City Council Agenda Packet 04-28-2014AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING – MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, April 28, 2014 – 7 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Mayor: Clint Herbst
Council Members: Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta, Brian Stumpf
1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
2A. Approval of Minutes – April 14, 2014 Regular Meeting
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
4. Citizen comments, public service announcements
A. Citizen Comments:
B. Public Service Announcements:
1) Monticello Recycling Day (5/3)
2) Bertram Clean Up Day (5/3)
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Consideration of approving payment of bills for April 28th
B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments
C. Consideration of approving an application for temporary on-sale liquor license for
the Monticello Lions Club for their Brewfest event on August 16, 2014
D. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing exclusive use of
West Bridge Park and related assistance in conjunction with the Brewfest event
on August 16, 2014. Applicant: Monticello Lions Club
E. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-040 accepting improvements and
authorizing final payment to Gertken Brothers, Inc. for the Great River Trailways
and Trailhead Improvements, City Project No. 10C010
F. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-039 approving a Final Stage Planned
Unit Development adjustment for Sunset Ponds Townhomes entrance
monuments. Applicant: Sunset Ponds I Townhome Association
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion
7. Regular Agenda:
A. Public Hearing – Hillside 3rd & 4th Public Improvements and Assessment Roll:
1) Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-041 ordering the improvements
for Hillside Farm 3rd & 4th Additions Public Improvements, City Project No.
12C008
2) Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-042 approving an assessment roll
for Hillside Farm 3rd & 4th Addition Public Improvements, City Project No.
12C008 and certifying the assessment roll to the County Auditor for
placement on the tax forfeit parcels
B. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-043 accepting bids and awarding the
contract for Hillside Farm 3rd & 4th Additions Public Improvements, City Project
No. 12C008
C. Consideration of approving Final State Planned Unit Development for a K-12
Educational Institution in an R-3 (Medium Density Residence) District and CCD
(Central Community District), adopting Ordinance #592 for rezoning to Planned
Unit Development, and adopting Resolution #2014-044 approving PUD and
Development Agreement. Applicant: Miller, Eric/SRCS Building Company,
o/b/o Swan River Montessori
D. Consideration of authorizing staff to pursue options for providing a loan and
extending term of existing financing to Swan River Building Committee for Swan
River Montessori school expansion
E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2014-045 amending the Monticello
Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 3 – Land Use as related to guiding principles and
locations for future high density housing. Applicant: City of Monticello
F. Consideration of adopting Ordinance No. 594 amending the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance, Chapter 3, Section 4(I) as related to guiding principles and locations
for future R-4 (Medium-High Density Residence) zoning districts. Applicant:
City of Monticello
8. Added Items
9. Adjournment
City Council Minutes – April 14, 2014 Page 1
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING – MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, April 14, 2014 – 7 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Present: Clint Herbst, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta, Brian Stumpf
Absent: None
1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Herbst called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. and declared a quorum present. The
Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
2A. Approval of Minutes – March 24, 2014 Special Meeting (lease)
TOM PERRAULT MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MARCH 24, 2014 SPECIAL
MEETING MINUTES ON THE OLD BOWLING ALLEY LEASE AS PRESENTED.
GLEN POSUSTA SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 3-0 WITH
CLINT HERBST, GLEN POSUSTA, AND TOM PERRAULT VOTING IN FAVOR.
(Lloyd Hilgart and Brian Stumpf did not vote.)
2B. Approval of Minutes – March 24, 2014 Special Meeting (flashing yellow arrows)
GLEN POSUSTA MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MARCH 24, 2014 SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES ON THE FLASHING YELLOW ARROWS ON SIGNALS AS
PRESENTED. TOM PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
3-0 WITH CLINT HERBST, GLEN POSUSTA, AND TOM PERRAULT VOTING IN
FAVOR. (Lloyd Hilgart and Brian Stumpf did not vote.)
2C. Approval of Minutes – March 24, 2014 Regular Meeting
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MARCH 24, 2014 REGULAR
MEETING MINUTES AS PRESENTED. TOM PERRAULT SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 4-0 WITH CLINT HERBST, GLEN POSUSTA,
BRIAN STUMPR, AND TOM PERRAULT VOTING IN FAVOR. (Lloyd Hilgart did
not vote.)
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
FiberNet Update (Jeff O’Neill)
4. Citizen comments, public service announcements, and updates
A. Citizen Comments: LeeAnn Hess, owner of Bliss Salon at 109 Walnut St,
talked about parking issues in front of her salon. The Lucille Murray Dance
Studio clients park in front of the existing Walnut Street businesses instead of
City Council Minutes – April 14, 2014 Page 2
parking in the public parking area at the north side of the Walnut Street parking
lot. The businesses in that block, including the owners of the dance studio, have
tried to work with the dance studio customers, but they continue to park in front
of the other businesses. She understands that all of the street parking is public
parking. She compared their situation to the restrictions on public parking in the
area of the community center and would like to know why they can’t have some
restrictions for their businesses. Clint Herbst suggested that some of the
businesses should meet with city representatives to see what they could work out.
Glen Posusta stated he feels that those businesses should have some ability to
control parking in front of their businesses. Ms. Hess also noted that there is no
designated handicapped parking either. Glen Posusta suggested that they may
also want to look at placement of handicapped parking signs. Brian Stumpf felt
handicapped parks signs may be helpful but may have to consider the best place
to locate them to not tie up other parking spots.
Council directed city staff to look into this situation and contact Ms. Hess for a
meeting with staff and businesses in that area of Walnut Street.
B. Public Service Announcements:
1) Tree Order Pickup (4/23-4/25) – Tom Pawelk reminded citizens that next
week is the time to pick up the trees that they ordered earlier this year.
Come to Public Works between hours of 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. on April 23, 24
or 25 to pick them up. Any trees that are not picked up will be planted on
city property by Public Works employees.
2) Monticello Recycling Day (5/3) – Tom Moores mentioned that Recycling
Day is scheduled for Saturday, May 3rd from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. contingent
upon approval of the special event permit by Council. This will be held in
the commuter parking lot along Hwy 25 south.
3) Friends of Bertram Clean Up (5/3) – Angela Schumann invited
community members to join Friends of Bertram on Saturday, May 3rd to
help with clean-up at Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park from 10 a.m.
to noon. Come to the park entrance by 10 a.m. and bring work gloves and
boots.
4) Leaf Pickup Day (5/10) – Tom Moores reminded residents to have their
bagged leaves at curbside by 7 a.m. on Saturday, May 10th for pickup.
5) Steve Joerg reported that two fire trucks have been moved south of I-94 at
Jay Morrell’s building for duration of the I-94 construction project. Tom
Perrault asked if there are any insurance concerns; Steve Joerg said no.
C. Updates:
City Council Minutes – April 14, 2014 Page 3
1) I-94 Reconstruction Project (WSB) – Shibani Bisson reviewed the I-94
construction work that starts tonight with building the crossovers. Traffic
will be reduced to one lane during night hours for this portion of the
project. More information can be found on the city and MnDOT websites
and announcements will continue to be posted on Facebook. Shibani
Bisson noted that four lanes of traffic will be open during daytime hours.
Brian Stumpf asked if eastbound ramps would be closed at the same time.
Shibani Bisson assured him that they would not.
Shibani Bisson noted that MnDOT has been providing updates to local
businesses on a weekly basis. The local group is working with MnDOT
for appropriate signage and their concerns about the detour route from CR
18 to CSAH 75 (Broadway).
Brian Finley, supervisor for Papa Murphy’s, spoke on behalf of business
owners along Hwy 25 and some ideas that they are working on to keep
travelers informed of business destinations on Hwy 25 during the
construction project. They would like to have temporary signs located at
7th Street and Chelsea Road to help direct traffic to businesses on Hwy 25.
Brian Stumpf felt that would be a fair request rather than have each
business try to place miscellaneous signs around town. Council felt that is
something the city could support.
2) FiberNet Monticello Update – Brian Estrem gave an update to Council
about the new SourceOne billing system. The migration process was quite
successful and bills were sent out close to the normal schedule. Rachel
Leonard was a big help in designing the bill layout and instructions to help
reduce the questions that customers might have. There were very few
calls from customers and the CSRs were able to help work through the
concerns. At first the CSRs were tentative about making the change to a
new system, but have found the new system easier to work with and
customers prefer the new bill format.
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Consideration of approving payment of bills for April 14th. Recommendation:
Approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $933,185.02.
B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments.
Recommendation: Ratify new hires and terminations for MCC and Parks.
C. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of city streets
and related assistance in conjunction with the Memorial Day parade on May 26,
2014. Applicant: Monticello American Legion. Recommendation: Approve
the Special Event Permit allowing use of city streets and related assistance in
City Council Minutes – April 14, 2014 Page 4
conjunction with the Memorial Day parade to be run by the Monticello Legion
and VFW on May 26, 2014.
D. Consideration of accepting quotes and authorizing purchase of a Bandit Brush
chipper by the Parks Department. Recommendation: Accept quotes and
authorize purchase of a 2014 Brush Bandit 990XP from Tri-State Bobcat at a cost
of $27,727.94, which includes the trade-in of the existing equipment.
E. Consideration of amending the City’s tobacco policy to treat e-cigarettes the same
as other tobacco products. THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT AGENDA.
F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of the city
commuter lot and related assistance in conjunction with Monticello Recycling
Day on May 3, 2014. Applicant: Jason Warhime/Metro Appliance Recycling.
THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.
G. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-032 accepting work and approving
final payment to WH Services for the West 7th Street Lighting Improvements,
City Project No. 12C002-LLIGHT. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution
#2014-032 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment of $4,520.00
to WH Services for West 7th Street Lighting Improvements, City Project No.
12C002-LLIGHT, subject to submission of all documents listed in the resolution.
H. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-037 approving Final Plat and
Developer’s Agreement for Pine View 2nd Addition. Applicant: Kjellberg, Kent.
THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.
I. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-038 approving an amendment to
Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for Union Crossings 6th
Addition and approving the Final Plat and Development Agreement for Union
Crossings 6th Addition. Applicant: Ryan Companies (Marshall’s).
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution #2014-038, approving the PUD
amendment to subdivide Lot 2, Block 1 of Union Crossings 5th Addition and
approving the Final Plat and amended Developer’s Contract and Planned Unit
Development Agreement for Union Crossings 6th Addition, based on findings in
said resolution and subject to the following conditions.
The applicant shall revise the plans to comply with all recommendations of the
City Engineer regarding grading, drainage, and utilities, if any.
The applicant shall provide documentation of updated easements for public and
private sewer, water, and access to the new parcels in the plat.
Execute a development agreement covering the terms of the City’s Plat and PUD
approval.
J. Consideration of approving a Conditional Use Permit for a K-12 School in an R-1
(Single Family Residence) District. Applicant: Holy Spirit Academy/St. Henry’s
City Council Minutes – April 14, 2014 Page 5
Church. Recommendation: Approve the Conditional Use Permit for Holy Spirit
Academy, based on findings in Planning Commission Resolution #2014-034 and
contingent on compliance with the following conditions.
A detailed sign plan shall be submitted subject to review by City Staff and sign
permit.
Future site and/or modifications related to an intensification of the school or
church use shall require approval of conditional use permit amendment.
Internal building modifications shall be subject to building permit as deemed
appropriate by the City Building Official.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE
REMOVAL OF ITEMS E, F AND H. LLOYD HILGART SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion
5E. Consideration of amending the City’s tobacco policy to treat e-cigarettes the same
as other tobacco products
Glen Posusta asked Kitty Baltos to talk about the reasons for bringing this policy
forward. Kitty Baltos pointed out that they have run into several incidents where
Monticello Community Center clients were using e-cigarettes inside the building. The
Monticello Community Center is a family-oriented facility and it does not seem
appropriate to allow any smoking in the building, including e-cigarettes. Clint Herbst
stated that the Community Center Advisory Board concurs with this.
Glen Posusta feels that this is an unnecessary restriction on peoples’ rights and read a
quote from Winston Churchill.
Kitty Baltos replied that this policy change is about restricting smoking activities inside
the building and there is a designated outside area where people can still smoke.
GLEN POSUSTA MOVED TO DENY AMENDING THE CITY’S TOBACCO
POLICY. BRIAN STUMPF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 3-2
WITH CLINT HERBST AND LLOYD HILGART VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
5F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of the city
commuter lot and related assistance in conjunction with Monticello Recycling Day on
May 3, 2014. Applicant: Jason Warhime/Metro Appliance Recycling
Tom Perrault noted that the agenda item included use of the old bowling alley parking lot
for overflow parking, if needed. He asked if the overflow parking at the old bowling
alley would interfere with use of the facility by the soccer association. Clint Herbst
explained that the Monticello Soccer Club is not pursuing use of the old bowling alley at
this time. Tom Perrault also asked about traffic concerns related to the I-94 construction
project and it appeared there are no concerns.
City Council Minutes – April 14, 2014 Page 6
GLEN POSUSTA MOVED TO APPROVE A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT, WITH FEE
WAIVED, FOR JASON WARHIME/METRO APPLIANCE RECYCLING TO USE
THE CITY COMMUTER LOT AND CITY RESOURCES IN CONJUNCTION WITH
MONTICELLO RECYCLING DAY ON MAY 3, 2014, SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. BRIAN STUMPF SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
Submission of a site plan for event operations, subject to review of the Street
Superintendent.
Submission of written permission of Muller Theatres property owner to utilize the gravel
area of the Muller Theater parking lot for the day of the event.
Submission of certificate of liability coverage with City named as additional insured for
event.
5H. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-037 approving Final Plat and
Developer’s Agreement for Pine View 2nd Addition. Applicant: Kjellberg, Kent
Tom Perrault had a question on the date of the irrevocable letter of credit. Angela
Schumann noted that this is a template for the developer to follow and they would need to
fill in a new date, depending on the option they elect for a letter of credit or cash security.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION #2014-037 APPROVING THE
FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPER’S AGREEMENT WITH KENT KJELLBERG FOR
PINE VIEW SECOND ADDITION BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN THE
RESOLUTION AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. TOM
PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
The final plat shall be revised to include proper documentation of the vacation of Otter
Creek right of way and drainage and utility easements.
The applicant shall provide drainage, erosion control, and stormwater management
plans for review and approval by the City Engineer, and will need to address any
recommendations the engineer makes in this regards. Further, development of the
proposed lots will need to adhere to erosion control and drainage requirements provided
in Sec. 11-5-5 and 11-5-6 of the Subdivision Ordinance, in addition to meeting related
standards provided in Zoning Ordinance Section 4.10.
The applicant shall comply with all recommendations of the City Engineer as provided in
the comment letter dated February 26th, 2014.
Future dwellings on subdivided parcels are required to meet the minimum width, depth,
and floor area standards provided in Chapter 5, Section 5.2(C) of the Zoning Ordinance,
and the minimum garage area standards for accessory garages in the R-1 District.
No building permits for lots shall be issued until the City has received satisfaction that
the plat has been recorded at the Wright County Recorder’s Office.
The applicant shall execute a development agreement covering the terms of the City’s
Plat and PUD approval.
City Council Minutes – April 14, 2014 Page 7
7. Regular Agenda:
A. Consideration of approving specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids
for replacement of a fire tender truck for the Monticello Fire Department
Jeff O’Neill reviewed this request and explained that this has been in the annual
Capital Improvement Plan for a number of years and it is budgeted to replace a
fire tender truck that has been removed from service. Jeff O’Neill noted that
Engine 1 will serve as a backup after some minor repairs. Fire Chief Steve Joerg
explained that the new tender will replace a 1982 model that is no longer in
service.
Clint Herbst asked about the complex specifications and wondered if there were
any concerns about missing anything during the bidding process. Steve Joerg
stated that he has been involved in bidding on two trucks and the specs are
generic but meant to cover all the needs for a particular vehicle.
Brian Stumpf asked about the general fund lease payments and how that would
work. Wayne Oberg explained a central equipment fund that has been set up for
capital equipment and the repayment process is similar to a lease where the
departments are charged annually to offset the costs of equipment purchases.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE SPECIFICATIONS AND
AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR A NEW FIRE TENDER
TRUCK (MFD #7). LLOYD HILGART SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
B. Consideration of approving the use of a portion of the former biosolids property
for the Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Complex
Jeff O’Neill and staff provided handouts and a presentation for Council
explaining the request to utilize a portion of the biosolids property to reconfigure
the Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Complex. Jeff O’Neill noted that the
original plan is a good plan and this change would enhance the plan. Tom Pawelk
discussed considerations of the reconfiguration and the portion of the biosolids
property that would be impacted. The Athletic Complex sub-committee felt that
it was important to explore possible benefits to reconfiguration prior to finalizing
grant applications.
Tom Pawelk spoke briefly about the biosolids property and its use for application
of biosolids. With the recent upgrades to the Wastewater Treatment Facility, the
land applications on the biosolids farm will no longer take place. The full 157
acres of this land will be eligible for other uses in October 2014.
Angela Schumann talking about the conceptual reconfiguration plan which would
utilize a strip of land along the southern portion of the biosolids property for
City Council Minutes – April 14, 2014 Page 8
regulation athletic play fields and would use approximately 26 acres of the
biosolids land. With this shift, approximately 11.5 acres of property within
Bertram Chain of Lakes would be converted from active fields to natural resource
programs. The total number of soccer fields would remain at ten fields while the
total number of softball/baseball fields would increase by two, pending the final
configuration of the southeastern-most field.
Jeff O’Neill reviewed the proposed reconfiguration concept drawings showing the
realignment of some of the athletic fields. Jeff O’Neill pointed out the benefits of
improved parking and traffic flow as well as pedestrian flow with the proposed
layout. With more spacing between fields, it improves the drainage of fields.
This may also allow better alignment of the drive access to the County’s camping
area in the park.
Glen Posusta asked about the timeline for phasing in the athletic fields once they
receive grant funding. Jeff O’Neill noted that they would like to wait as long as
possible before they would use the biosolids property so that it can continue to be
farmed for a few more years. Glen Posusta wanted to make sure this would not
interfere with the farm agreement as much as possible.
Angela Schumann briefly spoke on the revenue and cost analysis that has been
done. The value of the 26 acres of biosolids land at current county market value
is $6,018 per acre, or an impact of $156,468 if sold at today’s value. If those 26
acres are incorporated into the athletic complex, this could result in a loss of
future land rent each year. At the current lease rate of $225 per acre, the use of 26
acres would amount to a loss of $5,850 per year at current rates. However, there
should be no impact on revenue over the term of the current farm lease. The city
and county will have the opportunity to save approximately $75,000 each in local
match grant funding by reconfiguring this property from the current park
boundary to the biosolids land, depending on state match percentages.
Glen Posusta noted that the farm land is owned by the City and wanted to know if
the Bertram Chain of Lakes would purchase that from the City. Angela
Schumann explained that she is waiting to hear back from the State to find out if
they could apply for a grant to buy back that land and reimburse the sewer fund.
Jeff O’Neill discussed the recommendation that staff is suggesting to set aside 26
acres for use in the future for athletic field development. He noted the biosolids
land will continue to be used for farm land at this time. If this is approved by
Council, the next step will be to refine the concept plan. When development
begins, an amendment will be needed to the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Lloyd Hilgart asked why the Comp Plan would not be changed at this time. Jeff
O’Neill explained that it takes a super majority vote to do that, and the need for
the change has not been affirmed yet. Clint Herbst suggested that this 26 acres be
City Council Minutes – April 14, 2014 Page 9
the last portion to be developed for the athletic complex so that the land can
continue to be farmed for as long as possible.
Roger Pribyl, Monticello resident, spoke in favor of allowing 26 acres of the
biosolids property to be incorporated into the future athletic complex. Roger
Pribyl has been a youth sports promoter for many years and stated that there is a
shortage of fields in town. He would like to see the building of fields given a
priority. Jeff O’Neill noted that the order of which fields would be constructed
first has not been determined.
Lloyd Hilgart asked about the total acreage in the build-out of the fields. Jeff
O’Neill said, under the new concept, it would amount to around 120 acres for the
athletic complex. Lloyd Hilgart asked whether the county would consider paying
for half of the biosolids acreage. That is not known at this time, but Clint Herbst
stated that the county is contributing 50% of the athletic complex which will
largely benefit the Monticello community. Lloyd Hilgart asked if it would be
advantageous to shift the entire athletic complex to the biosolids property, which
would be less expensive to purchase. Jeff O’Neill explained that was discussed
but it may have an adverse effect on Legacy Grant funds. Glen Posusta also noted
that the biosolids farm land will become more valuable as the park develops.
Angela Schumann suggested that if the Council is inclined to approve the
reconfiguration, a contingency be added that the reconfiguration would be subject
to granting agency review as related to current grant awards and applications.
GLEN POSUSTA MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 APPROVING FUTURE
USE OF A PORTION OF THE BIOSOLIDS PROPERTY FOR BERTRAM
CHAIN OF LAKES ATHLETIC COMPLEX AS DESCRIBED IN THE
RECONFIGURATION ANALYSIS, SUBJECT TO CONTINGENCY OF
GRANTING AGENCY REVIEW AS RELATED TO CURRENT GRANT
AWARDS AND APPLICATIONS; AND THAT THE BIOSOLIDS PROPERTY
BE PHASED INTO THE LATTER PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
ATHLETIC COMPLEX. BRIAN STUMPF SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED 4-1 WITH TOM PERRAULT VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
Clint Herbst asked Tom Pawelk if there are any plans in mind for development of
the athletic complex. Tom Pawelk explained there is a requirement to develop up
to 40 acres within three years of receiving grant funds. Clint Herbst feels that it is
important to get something going before too long to show the public some of the
amenities that will be available at Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park.
C. Consideration of authorizing negotiation of terms of sale of City-owned property
at Otter Creek Business Park to Xcel Energy
Angela Schumann reported that Xcel Energy is interested in acquiring some
property in the Otter Creek Business Park for development of a substation along
City Council Minutes – April 14, 2014 Page 10
their transmission line route. Council is asked to authorize staff and the Land
Sale Team to negotiate with Excel Energy for a potential sale of land.
Angela Schumann pointed out the possible realignment of the Otter Creek
Crossings parcel that would be subdivided if a portion is sold to Xcel Energy.
BRIAN STUMPF FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 AUTHORIZING THE CITY
NEGOTIATIONS TEAM TO CONDUCT PRELIMINARY NEGOTIATIONS
AND REVIEW FEASIBILITY OF POTENTIAL SALE OF PROPERTY AT
OTTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK TO XCEL ENERGY FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF AN ELECTRIC SUBSTATION. GLEN POSUSTA
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
8. Added items
Clint Herbst mentioned that he has received quite a few emails regarding the sex
offender that has moved into the city of Monticello. He explained that the city
has little or no control over this, as this person has completed the terms of their
sentence. This is regulated by the state and the courts.
9. Adjournment
TOM PERRAULT MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:36 P.M. LLOYD
HILGART SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
Recorder: Catherine M. Shuman ____
Approved:
Attest: _______________________________
City Administrator
CityCouncilAgenda:4/28/14
1
5A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillregistersforApril28th (WO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
Citystaffsubmitstheattachedbillregistersandpurchasingcardregistersforapprovalby
Council.Thebillregisterscontainallinvoicesprocessedandthepurchasingcard
registerscontainallcardpurchasesmadesincethelastCouncilmeeting.SubjecttoMN
Statutes,mostinvoicesrequireCouncilapprovalpriortoreleasingchecksforpayment.
ThedayfollowingCouncilapproval,paymentswillbereleasedunlessdirected
otherwise.AcreditpurchasingagreementandpolicywasapprovedbyCouncilinitially
andcardpurchasesmustcomplywiththepolicy.
IfCouncilhasnoquestionsorcommentsonthebillandpurchasecardregisters,thesecan
beapprovedwiththeconsentagenda.Ifrequested,thisitemcanberemovedfrom
consentanddiscussedpriortomakingamotionforapproval.
A1.BudgetImpact:None
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Noadditionalworkrequired
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovethebillandpurchasecardregistersforatotalamountof
$542,105.43
2.MotiontoapprovetheregisterswithchangesdirectedbyCouncil.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1or#2,perdirectionofCouncil.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Billregisters
PurchaseCardregisters
User:
Printed:04/23/2014 - 11:59AM
Ann.Zimmerman
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch:00201.04.2014 - 201.04.2014 AP
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1604 HEALTH PARTNERS Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True
46818685 May 2014 51,196.58 04/06/2014 101-00000-217060
46818685 May 2014 5,609.15 04/06/2014 101-00000-217062
56,805.73Check Total:
Vendor:3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True
4/1/14 April 2014 1,839.48 04/06/2014 101-00000-217066
1,839.48Check Total:
Vendor:3337 SECURE PAYMENT SYSTEMS INC Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True
01385043 (187) verficiation inquiries 93.50 04/06/2014 655-49870-443980
93.50Check Total:
Vendor:2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True
4/6/14 MN Pollution Control Agency - annual haz waste fee 514.00 04/06/2014 101-43127-443700
4/6/14 Water Laboratories - Feb 2014 water testing 150.00 04/06/2014 601-49440-422740
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - hair & body wash, 9" tissue 272.80 04/06/2014 226-45122-421990
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - detergent, can liners, lysol 453.25 04/06/2014 226-45122-421100
4/6/14 utx - Spectrum Supply - (1) cs kleenex 49.81 04/06/2014 226-45122-421990
4/6/14 General Rental - 20lb propane 23.00 04/06/2014 101-43120-421990
4/6/14 Securitas - 2/14 & 2/15 - Knights of Columbus R1624 179.56 04/06/2014 226-45122-431992
4/6/14 Gradys - light bulbs 13.74 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - (1) rd strap 135.27 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Auto Value - (2) mini lamps, (1) bx 3"x30' veh rec strp 44.77 04/06/2014 101-45201-422100
4/6/14 H & L Mesabi - (11) blades, (2) curb runners 3,240.77 04/06/2014 101-43125-422460
4/6/14 Fastenal - misc nuts/bolts ect (dock & shop supp) 167.83 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 MAC Tools - filter cleaner, pin tow maint kit, ect 115.00 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Hirsfields - (1) gal brown paint, (1) green paint 84.98 04/06/2014 101-45201-421510
4/6/14 Napa - #108 & stock - (4) hose fittings, 9.8 hose, ect 85.45 04/06/2014 101-43120-422100
4/6/14 Central McGowan - C02 tank rental 48.09 04/06/2014 226-45122-441500
4/6/14 Quality Flow - pump safe monitoring module (Chestnut lift) 649.29 04/06/2014 602-49490-440440
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:59 AM)Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
4/6/14 Henry's Waterworks - (25) p-pll 1-1/4" plug only for pl-lid 158.76 04/06/2014 601-49440-422100
4/6/14 AmeriPride - inv #2200486667 uniform rental 18.25 04/06/2014 226-45122-441700
4/6/14 AmeriPride - invoice #2200486667 laundry services 69.31 04/06/2014 226-45122-431110
4/6/14 AmeriPride - invoice #2200486667 towel rental 20.38 04/06/2014 226-45122-441710
4/6/14 Fastenal - (2) cords 53.42 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Walmart - duct tape, screwdrivers, scotch tape 20.74 04/06/2014 226-45122-420990
4/6/14 Walmart - re-sale 77.90 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 utx - Gradys - tubing chains coil, snap hooks 157.74 04/06/2014 226-45122-421610
4/6/14 utx - Gradys - clip wire rope, link chain 5.96 04/06/2014 226-45122-422990
4/6/14 SuperAmerica - fuel for new F550 101.89 04/06/2014 101-43120-421200
4/6/14 SuperAmerica - #229 motor fuel 15.00 04/06/2014 101-45201-421200
4/6/14 SuperAmerica - #229 motor fuel 30.00 04/06/2014 101-45201-421200
4/6/14 Gradys - (1) bushing 2.99 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Gradys - 3/4" valve ball, nipples, ect 24.06 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Home Depot - laundry detergent, tray liners (split) 7.97 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Home Depot - laundry detergent, tray liners (split) 7.97 04/06/2014 602-49490-421990
4/6/14 Safety Kleen - w/prm solvent 189.62 04/06/2014 101-43127-431990
4/6/14 Napa - (2) air filters, (6) fuel filters, (15) oil filters, ect 256.19 04/06/2014 101-43127-422120
4/6/14 Napa - #108 - (1) air filter 19.01 04/06/2014 101-43120-422110
4/6/14 Home Depot - (3) tap sdle valves 23.55 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - (10) bx/100 disp gloves, (1) cs 9" paper plate 101.50 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - handwash, hair & body wsh, paper towels, ect 1,217.01 04/06/2014 226-45122-421990
4/6/14 utx - Spectrum Supply - (1) cs kleenex 49.81 04/06/2014 226-45122-421990
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - wipes, can liners, scrim wipers 459.29 04/06/2014 226-45122-421100
4/6/14 MacQueen Equip - #108 - (6) dirt shoe runners, (9) fl noz 194.33 04/06/2014 101-43120-422100
4/6/14 AmeriPride - invoice #2200489121 uniform rental 67.88 04/06/2014 226-45122-441700
4/6/14 AmeriPride - invoice #2200489121 laundry services 68.25 04/06/2014 226-45122-431110
4/6/14 AmeriPride - invoive #2200489121 towel rental 20.04 04/06/2014 226-45122-441710
4/6/14 utx - NBP - (13) rm copy paper 47.27 04/06/2014 226-45122-420990
4/6/14 Napa - #108 & stock - (4) lights 19.96 04/06/2014 101-43120-422100
4/6/14 Fastenal - screws (light pole access panel 7th St) 4.68 04/06/2014 101-43120-421990
4/6/14 Titan Machinery - #112 - (10) cs retainers, (5) cs tooth 104.45 04/06/2014 101-43120-422100
4/6/14 Napa - (2) oil filters (stock) 18.48 04/06/2014 101-43127-422120
4/6/14 Hillyard - (24) 15oz stainless steel cleaner, 8gal mariner, ect 511.67 04/06/2014 226-45122-421100
4/6/14 Batteries Plus - batteries (split) 32.01 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Batteries Plus - batteries (split) 32.01 04/06/2014 602-49490-421990
4/6/14 Holiday - motor fuel 35.32 04/06/2014 217-41990-421200
4/6/14 Hoglund Bus - #107 - (12) pins 29.70 04/06/2014 101-43120-422110
4/6/14 Wall Street Journal - monthly subscription 26.99 04/06/2014 101-41520-443300
4/6/14 Cub - re-sale 35.39 04/06/2014 609-49750-425500
4/6/14 Cub - re-sale 40.40 04/06/2014 609-49750-425500
4/6/14 G & K Services - inv# 1043648757 floor mat cleaning 142.62 04/06/2014 609-49754-431990
4/6/14 MN State Fire Chiefs Assoc - ((4) 2014 mmbrships 345.00 04/06/2014 101-42200-443300
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:59 AM)Page 2
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
4/6/14 Grady's (2) 64oz Liq Blue Carwash; (1) 4oz spray lube Triflow 20.47 04/06/2014 101-42200-422990
4/6/14 $5 Pizza - (5) pizzas - 3/10/14 special CC meeting 26.70 04/06/2014 101-41310-443990
4/6/14 NeoPost Great Plains - 12/18/13 service - billed for sealing kit 66.26 04/06/2014 101-41940-440440
4/6/14 RCB Assoc dba Audio Comm - ZZZNEP- repair radio battery/labor 125.00 04/06/2014 101-42500-440440
4/6/14 RCB Assoc dba Audio Comm - Reset system - labor/DTP software kit 427.78 04/06/2014 655-49870-440440
4/6/14 Streichers - inv I1077159 - (3) black gear bag 63.00 04/06/2014 101-42200-421990
4/6/14 Duluth Trading Co - (1) XLG black 50019 MN NEOS overshoes 84.95 04/06/2014 101-42400-421110
4/6/14 Advanced Disposal - February 2014 31,910.69 04/06/2014 101-43230-431000
4/6/14 Advanced Disposal - February 2014 10,520.25 04/06/2014 101-43230-431010
4/6/14 Advanced Disposal - February 2014 102.81 04/06/2014 655-49870-431000
4/6/14 Advanced Disposal - February 2014 34.34 04/06/2014 655-49870-431010
4/6/14 Advanced Disposal - February 2014 35.80 04/06/2014 101-43127-431000
4/6/14 Advanced Disposal - February 2014 83.16 04/06/2014 101-45201-431000
4/6/14 Advanced Disposal - February 2014 113.39 04/06/2014 602-49480-431000
4/6/14 Advanced Disposal - February 2014 208.87 04/06/2014 226-45122-431000
4/6/14 Advanced Disposal - February 2014 11.93 04/06/2014 101-45501-431990
4/6/14 Advanced Disposal - February 2014 23.87 04/06/2014 609-49754-431000
4/6/14 Advanced Disposal - MGFARM - 100 Broadway E - February 2014 10.55 04/06/2014 213-46522-431000
4/6/14 NFPA - NFPA Book 17A - Standard for Wet Chemical Ext Systems 32.85 04/06/2014 101-42200-443500
4/6/14 Allina Health - (1) Hepatitis B vaccination - S.W. 92.00 04/06/2014 602-49490-420650
4/6/14 Auto Value Monticello - (1) Viking 2 1/2 ton jack 150.00 04/06/2014 101-42200-421990
4/6/14 Auto Value Monticello - (1) 1/2" dr. round head 14.99 04/06/2014 101-42200-421990
4/6/14 Monticello Printing - (1) 2:x8" name plate - S.B. 14.50 04/06/2014 101-43111-421990
4/6/14 Walmart - (1) 3pk 4GB flash drive 14.93 04/06/2014 101-41520-421990
4/6/14 Walmart - (3) face tussue 18.82 04/06/2014 655-49870-421990
4/6/14 Walmart - copy paper; sheet protctr; tele message 38.85 04/06/2014 655-49870-420990
4/6/14 Walmart - (2) Trac phone 193.54 04/06/2014 655-49870-421990
4/6/14 OfficeMax - (1) HP 60 clr/60XL blk ink CVP 56.99 04/06/2014 101-42200-420990
4/6/14 NBP - inv 691163-0 (2) ct multi-fld ppr towel 94.95 04/06/2014 101-42200-421990
4/6/14 NBP - inv 690281-0 (1) ct creamer packs 29.99 04/06/2014 101-41940-443990
4/6/14 NBP - inv 690281-0 (1) coat hook 8.49 04/06/2014 101-41940-421990
4/6/14 NBP - inv 690281-0 Paper(1) ct 20# brite white;(1) rm 20# multi 63.57 04/06/2014 101-41940-420300
4/6/14 NBP - inv 690281-0 (3) pk 3/8" thumbtack; (4) rl tape Post-it 11.97 04/06/2014 101-41940-420990
4/6/14 Amazon.com - (2) books 31.71 04/06/2014 101-41800-421990
4/6/14 Crysteel Truck Equip - Streets - F550 dump body 13,294.94 04/06/2014 703-00000-165010
4/6/14 Crysteel Truck Equip - Parks - F550 dump body 23,683.63 04/06/2014 703-00000-165010
4/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - (14) lights 4489 School Blvd 193.90 04/06/2014 101-43160-431900
4/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - 2/16-3/15/14 (30) lights School Blvd 415.50 04/06/2014 101-43160-431900
4/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - 2/16-3/15/14 (9) lights 7th St & Highland 90.00 04/06/2014 101-43160-431900
4/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - 2/16-3/15/14 Cedar St Dundas to Chelsea 124.65 04/06/2014 101-43160-431900
4/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - 2/16-3/15/14 Chelsea Rd E 180.00 04/06/2014 101-43160-431900
4/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - 2/16-3/15/14 School Blvd Fenning/18/Edmon 372.00 04/06/2014 101-43160-431900
4/6/14 Spirit Comm - C.A.L.E.A. 3/1-3/31/14 656.37 04/06/2014 655-49870-431970
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:59 AM)Page 3
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
4/6/14 Ancom Comm - (3) belt clip for speaker mic 60.81 04/06/2014 101-42200-421990
4/6/14 Arctic Glacier - re-sale 105.66 04/06/2014 609-49750-425500
4/6/14 G & K Services - inv 1043659355 floor mat cleaning 64.06 04/06/2014 609-49754-431990
4/6/14 Cub - re-sale 20.53 04/06/2014 609-49750-425500
4/6/14 Cub - re-sale 24.00 04/06/2014 609-49750-425500
4/6/14 Cub - re-sale 40.50 04/06/2014 609-49750-425500
4/6/14 Cub - re-sale 21.83 04/06/2014 609-49750-425500
4/6/14 SuperAmerica - (28.253) gallons unit #1 B.N. 98.01 04/06/2014 655-49870-421200
4/6/14 SuperAmerica - (30.435) gallons unit #1 B.N. 108.62 04/06/2014 655-49870-421200
4/6/14 O Ryans - (29.224) gallons unit #2 D.S. 105.18 04/06/2014 655-49870-421200
4/6/14 Home Depot - (1) weather station - deluxe wireless 89.92 04/06/2014 101-42200-421990
4/6/14 Home Depot - (2) 2pk electronic watch size 2032 11.94 04/06/2014 101-42200-421990
4/6/14 Home Depot - 2lt LED white emergency light 43.94 04/06/2014 101-42200-422990
4/6/14 Home Depot - (1) 32oz Windex; (1) 200ct Rags in a Box 12.75 04/06/2014 101-42200-421100
4/6/14 Home Depot - (1) Rayovac AA 60 alkaline pro pack 19.21 04/06/2014 655-49870-422990
4/6/14 Home Depot - (1) 50 pk anchor 14.92 04/06/2014 656-49877-421990
4/6/14 Home Depot - (1) 48" wood lath bundle-mark crossings I-94 proj 15.57 04/06/2014 656-49877-421990
4/6/14 Streichers - inv I1078571 (1) belt 25.99 04/06/2014 101-42200-421120
4/6/14 Streichers - inv I1080536 (1) pr 11.5M shoes 74.99 04/06/2014 101-42200-421120
4/6/14 Streichers - inv I1078815 (2) shirt; (1) pant 160.97 04/06/2014 101-42200-421120
4/6/14 Monticello NAPA - (1) valve cover gas '97 Dodge Caravan 18.29 04/06/2014 101-42400-421990
4/6/14 Monti NAPA - Generator (2) 301 battery; (1) deposit (refunded) 247.44 04/06/2014 655-49870-422990
4/6/14 Monti NAPA - (1) core deposit refund (refer to 3/18/14 charge)-16.03 04/06/2014 655-49870-422990
4/6/14 Arctic Glacier - inv #425408506 re-sale 68.86 04/06/2014 609-49750-425500
4/6/14 G & K Serv - inv 1043669935 floor mat cleaning 142.62 04/06/2014 609-49754-431990
4/6/14 DISH - 4/2-5/1/14 digital music 56.64 04/06/2014 609-49754-432500
4/6/14 Bluestone Grille - Safety Bingo prize - (1) gift card 35.00 04/06/2014 101-41800-443990
4/6/14 Wright Henn ELec - Mar HADCO lights @ East 7th St 357.75 04/06/2014 101-43160-431900
4/6/14 O Reillys - (1) jumpstart 79.99 04/06/2014 101-42200-421990
4/6/14 Walmart - Wine Tasting - (1) coffee maker; (12) tablecloth; ect. 56.62 04/06/2014 609-49750-425550
4/6/14 Walmart - (1) 3 pk duster 12.79 04/06/2014 655-49870-421100
4/6/14 USPS - (1) .7 oz1st class mail letter - Return recpt/certified 12.98 04/06/2014 213-46301-432200
4/6/14 $5 Pizza - pizza for 3/24/14 special CC meeting 6.41 04/06/2014 101-41310-443990
4/6/14 Spring Aquatics - (120) goggles 598.20 04/06/2014 226-45127-425490
4/6/14 utx - Spring Aquatics - training fins 15.30 04/06/2014 226-45127-421980
4/6/14 Holiday - motor fuel 40.18 04/06/2014 217-41990-421200
4/6/14 Gradys - (1) elbow, (1) bushing, (1) paint brush, ect 58.25 04/06/2014 601-49440-422300
4/6/14 G & K Services - floor mats 76.53 04/06/2014 217-41990-431990
4/6/14 Horizon Pool - pool chemicals 38.08 04/06/2014 226-45122-421600
4/6/14 1st Line Leewes - slushie machine supplies 395.75 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 Cub - juice boxes 4.02 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 Cub - juice boxes 4.02 04/06/2014 226-45127-421460
4/6/14 Home Depot - refrigeration coil 7.67 04/06/2014 601-49440-422300
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:59 AM)Page 4
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
4/6/14 Home Depot - (1) comp valve, (2) 2pk wheel cutter 21.68 04/06/2014 601-49440-422300
4/6/14 Home Depot - returned wheel cutter -5.98 04/06/2014 601-49440-422300
4/6/14 Walmart - tennis balls (sign room) 9.52 04/06/2014 101-43127-422300
4/6/14 Best Western - 3/18/14 St Cloud - K.B. & C.S. 95.52 04/06/2014 101-41310-433100
4/6/14 West Metro - Sq 5 - '02 Chev Blazer - replace rear brakes; ect. 1,109.04 04/06/2014 101-42200-440500
4/6/14 West Metro - Sq 5 - '02 Chev Blazer - replace ignition sw; ect. 419.50 04/06/2014 101-42200-440500
4/6/14 Office Max - (2) 2500 sheets/case bright 64.10 04/06/2014 655-49870-420300
4/6/14 NBP - (1) 96x48 dry erase board w/aluminum frame 271.43 04/06/2014 655-49870-420990
4/6/14 NBP - (1) 4/set dry erase markers; (1) 25/bx hanging folder; ect 43.20 04/06/2014 655-49870-420990
4/6/14 NBP - inv 697625-0 (1) dz Expo blue marker 16.79 04/06/2014 101-41940-420990
4/6/14 NBP - inv 697625-1 (3) dz assort Expo marker; (1) pk 11x8 filler 53.50 04/06/2014 101-41940-420990
4/6/14 NBP - inv 697625-1 (2) chairmat rec clr 173.39 04/06/2014 101-41940-421990
4/6/14 utx - Nix - 3/19/14 Becker - Fiber meeting - J.O. 11.32 04/06/2014 655-49870-443990
4/6/14 Nix - 3/19/14 Becker - Fiber meeting - J.O. 1.70 04/06/2014 655-49870-443990
4/6/14 SCSU Cont Ed - 2014 MN Municipal Clerks Inst 4/28-5/2/14-K.B. 210.00 04/06/2014 101-41310-433200
4/6/14 Roar Postal Supplies - (1) Neopost ink cartridge 90.50 04/06/2014 101-41940-420990
4/6/14 CPE Link - GAAP 2014 Update - W.O. 119.00 04/06/2014 101-41520-433200
4/6/14 MN Telecom Alliance - Full Convention - B.E.; Day Event - B.R. 515.00 04/06/2014 655-49870-433200
4/6/14 Rapit Printing - (34) t-shirts 3-posi imprint (Cargill to reimb) 584.95 04/06/2014 101-42200-115030
4/6/14 utx - Amazon.com - (1) Expo 7 pc dry erase organizer kit 14.99 04/06/2014 655-49870-420990
4/6/14 Amazon.com - (1) 72x48 dry erase board 179.98 04/06/2014 655-49870-420990
4/6/14 Amazon.com - (3) 12 bx of 125 facial tissue 53.97 04/06/2014 101-41940-420990
4/6/14 Amazon.com - (3) mounting tape 25.97 04/06/2014 101-41940-420990
4/6/14 NBP - inv 698312-0 (2) brush/plngr caddy; bowl clnr; wipes; ect. 162.60 04/06/2014 609-49754-421100
4/6/14 Cub - re-sale 29.14 04/06/2014 609-49750-425500
4/6/14 NBP - inv 693111-0 (3) 3x3 pad note; (2) pencill holder; ect. 56.50 04/06/2014 101-41940-420990
4/6/14 utx - Great Garage Products Inc - gate repair 238.10 04/06/2014 655-49870-440990
4/6/14 Nextel - 2/13-3/12/14 29.03 04/06/2014 101-43111-432100
4/6/14 Nextel - 2/13-3/12/14 29.03 04/06/2014 601-49440-432100
4/6/14 Nextel - 2/13-3/12/14 29.03 04/06/2014 602-49490-432100
4/6/14 Nextel - 2/13-3/12/14 17.31 04/06/2014 655-49870-432100
4/6/14 utx - Nextel - 2/13-3/12/14 11.71 04/06/2014 655-49870-432100
4/6/14 Home Depot - (2) 2pk sanding belts, (3) dowel pins, ect 37.82 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 OfficeMax - (3) rolls laminate, tape disp, audio cable 37.48 04/06/2014 226-45122-420990
4/6/14 Gradys - (1) drill bit, (1) tap wrench, ect (fam lock rm) 20.27 04/06/2014 226-45122-422990
4/6/14 Batteries Plus - #2 batteries for meter readers 43.48 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Specialty Turf - (4) 50lb bag white striping 896.00 04/06/2014 101-45203-421990
4/6/14 North Central Services - back hoe bucket (split) 655.40 04/06/2014 601-49440-424100
4/6/14 North Central Services - back hoe bucket (split) 655.40 04/06/2014 602-49490-422100
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - (2) belt buckles for UV964 35.27 04/06/2014 226-45122-422990
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - (1) cs popcorn bags, (1) cs 8oz cups, ect 218.18 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - hair & body wash, hand wash, 9" tissue, ect 323.23 04/06/2014 226-45122-421990
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - detergent, scoruing sponges, can liners, ect 277.19 04/06/2014 226-45122-421100
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:59 AM)Page 5
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - (2) wet tool blades 48.46 04/06/2014 226-45122-422990
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - paper plates, 16oz cups, ect 229.81 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 utx - Spectrum Supply - (1) cs coffee filters, (1) cs kleenex 63.74 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - hair & body wash 97.15 04/06/2014 226-45122-421990
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - wipes, can liners, disp gloves, ect 439.71 04/06/2014 226-45122-421100
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - (1) cs 8oz cups, (1) cs forks, (1) cs plates 63.29 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - hair & body wash, (2) wood handles 97.15 04/06/2014 226-45122-421990
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - wipes, can liners 309.94 04/06/2014 226-45122-421100
4/6/14 BLI Lighting - (24) lu250/clear/mog lights 513.67 04/06/2014 101-43160-421530
4/6/14 Biffs - 2/4/14 thru 3/4/14 public works & 3 parks 179.16 04/06/2014 101-45201-443990
4/6/14 ZZBCOL - Menards - (15) 2x6-20' treated wood 275.30 04/06/2014 101-45201-422990
4/6/14 Cub - kleenex, paper plates, forks, spoons, ect 29.46 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Cub - 409, bleach, scouring pads, ect 20.54 04/06/2014 101-43127-421100
4/6/14 Cub - coffee filters, coffee 55.74 04/06/2014 101-43127-443990
4/6/14 Napa - (1) scraper, (1) lng barre 95.16 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Home Depot - (4) bolt hangers, 4x8 sanded pine, ect 24.22 04/06/2014 601-49440-422300
4/6/14 Science Museum - Advanced Database Design 6/25/14 (J.H) 37.50 04/06/2014 601-49440-433200
4/6/14 Walmart - movie "Frozen" 15.99 04/06/2014 226-45127-421980
4/6/14 Walmart - (1) cozy coupe 40.61 04/06/2014 226-45127-421740
4/6/14 Walmart - pudding, nutri grain bars, applesauce, ect 51.02 04/06/2014 226-45127-421981
4/6/14 Walmart - zone bars, special K bars, apples, ect 51.26 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 Walmart - batteries 32.00 04/06/2014 226-45122-421990
4/6/14 Dish - sirius music ect (monthly charge) 80.16 04/06/2014 226-45122-432500
4/6/14 Vista Print - 1,000 post cards (membership renewal) 80.67 04/06/2014 226-45122-420300
4/6/14 Walmart - bananas, zone bars, ect 21.82 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 Walmart - cupcakes 12.00 04/06/2014 226-45127-421460
4/6/14 Walmart - sugar, creamer, ect 13.56 04/06/2014 226-45127-420750
4/6/14 Walmart - clorox wipes, ect 7.69 04/06/2014 226-45122-421100
4/6/14 Walmart - pliers, ect 30.02 04/06/2014 226-45122-421990
4/6/14 Walmart - (2) basket ball nets 8.49 04/06/2014 226-45127-421730
4/6/14 Walmart - batteries (tv remotes) 9.34 04/06/2014 226-45122-420990
4/6/14 Walmart - (2) cue assesory, billboard chalk 5.22 04/06/2014 226-45127-420750
4/6/14 Gradys - (15) philips screws, (100) sheet metal screws 2.14 04/06/2014 226-45122-422990
4/6/14 Walmart - 16ct swif, soft scrub, Mr Clean pads 26.52 04/06/2014 226-45122-421100
4/6/14 Walmart - cupcakes 12.00 04/06/2014 226-45127-421460
4/6/14 Walmart - bananas, apples, ect 28.16 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 Home Depot - (1) shelf (fitness equip) 59.71 04/06/2014 226-45122-421990
4/6/14 Home Depot - (1) chime (childcare door) 28.85 04/06/2014 226-45127-421740
4/6/14 ZZBCOL - (1) gal w&g remover (dock prep) 21.99 04/06/2014 101-45201-422990
4/6/14 1st Lines Leewes - slushie machine supplies 395.75 04/06/2014 226-45127-425410
4/6/14 General Rental - 20lb propane fill 23.00 04/06/2014 101-45201-421650
4/6/14 General Rental - tx portion reimb (20lb propane fill)-1.48 04/06/2014 101-45201-421650
4/6/14 AmeriPride - #2200494245 - uniform rental credit -27.75 04/06/2014 226-45122-441700
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:59 AM)Page 6
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
4/6/14 AmeriPride - #2200494245 - laundry services 69.31 04/06/2014 226-45122-431110
4/6/14 AmeriPride - #2200494245 - towel rental 20.38 04/06/2014 226-45122-441710
4/6/14 Anderson Crane - (4) v-belts 43.06 04/06/2014 226-45122-422990
4/6/14 Science Museum - Advanced Database Design 6/25/14 (J.H) 37.50 04/06/2014 602-49490-433200
4/6/14 RecSupply - (2) 2" flow meters 211.29 04/06/2014 226-45122-421610
4/6/14 Two Footloose Soles - (1) pr safety boots (M.R.) 90.00 04/06/2014 101-43120-420650
4/6/14 Park Supply - (6) symmons escutcheons (men's shower) 231.17 04/06/2014 226-45122-422300
4/6/14 Park Supply - (6) stretch hoses (showers) 82.88 04/06/2014 226-45122-422990
4/6/14 Boyer - #107 & #109 - (2) clamps, (1) air kit, (2) asy pipe 1,391.71 04/06/2014 101-43120-422110
4/6/14 Schluender Const - (5) hr backhoe w/hammer @ 6th Street 1,125.00 04/06/2014 601-49440-431990
4/6/14 American Leak Detection - leak detections @ 6th & Locust 350.00 04/06/2014 601-49440-431990
4/6/14 utx - NBP - (14) rm copy paper, (2) pk tape, ect 98.29 04/06/2014 226-45122-420990
4/6/14 utx - NBP - 2 ct thermal roll 109.00 04/06/2014 226-45122-420990
4/6/14 General Rental - 3/18-3/20/14 100' sewer tape rental 10.82 04/06/2014 101-41941-422990
4/6/14 General Rental - 3/17-3/20/14 100' sewer tape rental 9.57 04/06/2014 101-41941-422990
4/6/14 Moon Motors - Unit 1163 generator - (5) assorted gaskets; ect. 26.44 04/06/2014 101-42200-422990
4/6/14 Gradys - (2) keyblank; rack tag-key 8 tag 12.97 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - (2) Carbon brush sets 24.44 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - (2) tork security bits 3.44 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - (100) conical 14-16x1 3/8 2.63 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - (100) CB 5/16-18 x 1 z 7.48 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - (6) $2.49 ea 4-1/2x.04x7/8 A60TZ 14.94 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - (90) 10-24 x 1/2 SSS CP 6.18 04/06/2014 101-43120-422600
4/6/14 Fastenal - (12) 6 - MB1 3/4x10 Ga. Reg. & 6 - MB1 3/4x1 Ga. Reg 6.69 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - (4) 5/8-11Nylock Z 1.27 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Gradys - (2) Screw Lath; Barb Nylon 1/2MPTx1/2 BARB 11.78 04/06/2014 101-43127-422300
4/6/14 Gradys - (1) Glue Plastic Welder 1 oz 6.49 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Gradys - (2) Bit Drill Cobalt 3/16" 10.98 04/06/2014 101-45201-422300
4/6/14 MAC Tools - (1) 6/12V Circuit Tester 29.99 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Gradys - (2) bit drill 1/4" cobalt & washer SS Flat #10 8.83 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Home Depot - (2) 3/4" EMT Conduit x 10' 6.24 04/06/2014 101-43120-422600
4/6/14 Z-Tech Waggoner - #145 - rust protection 840.98 04/06/2014 703-00000-165010
4/6/14 Z-Tech Waggoner - #229 - rust protection 806.97 04/06/2014 703-00000-165010
4/6/14 Home Depot - (8) 300w bulbs (sign room) 34.96 04/06/2014 101-43127-421530
4/6/14 Constant Contact - monthly fee - over 2500 emails 50.00 04/06/2014 226-45122-430920
4/6/14 Ace Hardware - cork board (hallway bulletin board) 52.33 04/06/2014 226-45122-420990
4/6/14 utx - NBP - (1) pk thrm rl paper 17.99 04/06/2014 226-45122-420990
4/6/14 Gradys - bushings, nipples, ect (flag pole parts) 9.77 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 utx - Gradys - hardware (mounting supp for cork board) 19.06 04/06/2014 226-45122-422990
4/6/14 utx - Gradys - 4pk bubls, (2) key blanks 15.96 04/06/2014 226-45122-422990
4/6/14 Auto Value - (1) starter handle 3.49 04/06/2014 101-45201-422100
4/6/14 Postal Service - flouride sample to state 3.22 04/06/2014 601-49440-432200
4/6/14 Spectrum Supply - (2) cs can liners, (3) cs tissue 281.13 04/06/2014 101-43120-421990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:59 AM)Page 7
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
4/6/14 Environmental Equip - (1) single valve assy remcor (sweeper) 119.89 04/06/2014 101-43120-422100
4/6/14 Horizon Pool - pool chemicals 1,367.96 04/06/2014 226-45122-421600
4/6/14 Holiday - motor fuel 34.98 04/06/2014 217-41990-421200
4/6/14 Home Depot - doorbell chime (front door) 49.12 04/06/2014 226-45122-422990
4/6/14 IMBA - (2) bks - Trail Solutions & Manag Mnt Biking 87.40 04/06/2014 101-45201-433200
4/6/14 Monticello NAPA - (3) couplings 8.31 04/06/2014 101-43120-422110
4/6/14 Monticello NAPA - (1) all well & booster turbine oil 48.00 04/06/2014 601-49440-421300
4/6/14 Monticello NAPA - (2) S (523,539,530); (1) mud flaps 43.85 04/06/2014 101-43120-422100
4/6/14 Monticello NAPA - (1) Battery 7535 87.97 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Monticello NAPA - (2) shop supplies; PTEX THRD 37.98 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Monticello NAPA -(1) drain plug;(12) plugs LIT 50-94993-3 &94902 24.47 04/06/2014 101-43120-422100
4/6/14 Gradys - (1) nipple 3/4xclose glv; (1) hex bushing 1x3/4 glv 5.38 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Gradys - (4) shop supplies 2-bit drills & 2-plastic garden scps 17.48 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - (3) 5/16-18x1 HWSLTCS F;(5)5/16-18X1 1/4 HWSLTC 4.00 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - (1) hinge;8-1/2-20x3/4S/S HCS;8-S/S FW1/2x5/8od;tap 9.11 04/06/2014 601-49440-422300
4/6/14 Fastenal - (1) new bench vise for shop 139.99 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - bolts for str light replacement; repl bad shop cord 42.00 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - sign room project; (36) Trubolt 3/8 x 3 Z 13.88 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - sign room project; SDS 3/8 x 12" OAL 15.14 04/06/2014 101-43127-422300
4/6/14 MAC Tools - (1) 5 pc straight extractor set 39.99 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Home Depot - 5 gal Homer Leakproof & 5 gal Homer bucket 11.55 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Pipeline Supply - sign room; 8" x 14' SDR 35 Gasketed SW pipe 256.80 04/06/2014 101-43127-422300
4/6/14 Pipeline Supply - sign room; 8" x 14' SDR 35 Gasketed SW pipe 128.40 04/06/2014 101-43127-422300
4/6/14 Home Depot - (2) 3/4" corner brace zinc 4pk 3.94 04/06/2014 601-49440-422300
4/6/14 Home Depot - (3) hanger bolt plain 5/16"-18x3" 3.54 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Home Depot - (15) 3/4" EMT conduit x 10' 46.80 04/06/2014 101-43120-422600
4/6/14 Home Depot - Welcome Signs caulking and foam fill 59.90 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Home Depot - 2" Scotch Blue Painters; 3/4"x10' blk pipe 27.91 04/06/2014 101-45201-422990
4/6/14 Hirshfields - Welcome to Monti. Sign; 1 gal heavy duty deep base 40.99 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Fastenal - hardware for docks; 5/16-18x2 .25 TRX FLOR 42.66 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 General Rental - (1) 20# propane fill 23.00 04/06/2014 101-43120-421990
4/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 77.37 04/06/2014 101-42400-432100
4/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 23.21 04/06/2014 101-43115-432100
4/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 3.36 04/06/2014 655-49870-432100
4/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 2.52 04/06/2014 226-45122-432100
4/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 15.60 04/06/2014 101-45201-432100
4/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 79.02 04/06/2014 101-43120-432100
4/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 (1/2) 59.15 04/06/2014 601-49440-432100
4/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 (1/2) 59.15 04/06/2014 602-49490-432100
4/6/14 utx - Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 198.32 04/06/2014 655-49870-432100
4/6/14 utx - Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 122.96 04/06/2014 226-45122-432100
4/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 -31.30 04/06/2014 226-45122-432100
4/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 2/4-3/3/14 -46.95 04/06/2014 655-49870-432100
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:59 AM)Page 8
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
4/6/14 Target - (1) fruit bowl 14.42 04/06/2014 226-45127-421450
4/6/14 Crysteel Truck - #206 - (2) fender; hitch; ect. 360.15 04/06/2014 101-45201-422110
4/6/14 Pipeline Supply - (100) ft 1/4" blue ro tubing from filter to fc 51.60 04/06/2014 601-49440-421990
4/6/14 Gradys - flag pole parts - (3) snap rd eye; (4) galv hook snap 38.08 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Titan Machinery - #104 & stock - (3) rod assy; (3) seal kit; ect 1,211.47 04/06/2014 101-43120-422100
4/6/14 Z-Tech - Parks truck - exterior protection 1,094.00 04/06/2014 703-00000-165010
4/6/14 Barco Products - (6) 10-roll (2000) bags case - pet waste bags 430.42 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 AmeriPride - inv 2200491305 - uniform rental 18.25 04/06/2014 226-45122-441700
4/6/14 AmeriPride - inv 2200491305 - laundry services 69.31 04/06/2014 226-45122-431110
4/6/14 AmeriPride - inv 2200491305 - towel rental 20.38 04/06/2014 226-45122-441710
4/6/14 Rhomar Ind - (1) cs 12 bottles Tagster Graffiti Emulsifier 226.82 04/06/2014 101-45201-421600
4/6/14 RBA & Assoc - (100) rocker plastic tip 7/8" OD 3/4 ID 35.93 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 NCH Corp dba Dyna - drill screws; taps; flats; ect. 207.82 04/06/2014 101-43127-421990
4/6/14 NCH Corp dba Dyna - (20) bolt GR8 dome head plow 75.85 04/06/2014 101-43125-422450
4/6/14 General Rental - Bertha torch - 20lbs propane fill 21.52 04/06/2014 101-43120-421990
4/6/14 NBP - (2) ct copy paper 85.98 04/06/2014 217-41990-420300
4/6/14 NBP - (3) box envelope; (2) pk pen refl; (4) moistener; ect. 102.00 04/06/2014 217-41990-420990
4/6/14 Olson & Sons Elec - (1) lamp MH 250W MOG clr sm/BT28/ED2 26.56 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Vans Flags - flag pole parts-(130) 5/16 wirecore rope; ect. 356.70 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Auto Value Monticello - docks-primer/paint 158.97 04/06/2014 101-45201-421510
4/6/14 Auto Value Monticello - respirators-(2) P95/organic vapor 35.98 04/06/2014 101-45201-420650
4/6/14 Auto Value Monticello - (2) 1 1/4" T.T. valve 453; (1) dome cap 5.97 04/06/2014 101-45201-422990
4/6/14 Central McGowan - inv 00774850 (225) lb bulk caron dioxide 59.32 04/06/2014 226-45122-421600
4/6/14 utx - Central McGowan - inv 00774850 shipping 21.50 04/06/2014 226-45122-421600
4/6/14 Far From Normal - (10) 30" grip sandblast mas 207.18 04/06/2014 101-45201-421990
4/6/14 Olson & Sons - (1) midget fuse, (1) fuse holder 58.50 04/06/2014 101-43120-421990
4/6/14 NWPE - lot service work for solenoid control valve 1,250.00 04/06/2014 601-49440-440440
4/6/14 utx - MayFlower - paper plates, napkins 238.65 04/06/2014 226-45127-421460
4/6/14 Global Industries - boot ice tractions per OSHA 25.11 04/06/2014 601-49440-420650
4/6/14 Global Industries - boot ice tractions per OSHA 25.11 04/06/2014 602-49490-420650
4/6/14 Global Industries - boot ice tractions per OSHA 25.11 04/06/2014 602-49490-420650
4/6/14 Global Industries - boot ice tractions per OSHA 25.12 04/06/2014 601-49440-420650
4/6/14 Warning Lites - 3/6/14 Work Zone Seminar (2 employees) 69.90 04/06/2014 101-45201-433200
4/6/14 Warning Lites - 3/6/14 Work Zone Seminar (4 employees) 139.80 04/06/2014 101-43120-433200
4/6/14 Commercial Pool - pool seminar March 2014 (MG) 259.00 04/06/2014 226-45122-433200
4/6/14 Dept of Labor - boiler's lic (BW) 45.00 04/06/2014 226-45122-443700
126,466.99Check Total:
Vendor:2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True
00006003717 Gateway transaction/program fees March 2014 37.20 04/06/2014 655-49870-443980
00006003717 Gateway transaction/program fees March 2014 10.25 04/06/2014 601-49440-443980
00006003717 Gateway transaction/program fees March 2014 10.25 04/06/2014 602-49490-443980
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:59 AM)Page 9
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
00006046717 Vanco Fitness Rewards March 2014 132.00 04/06/2014 226-45122-430700
189.70Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
185,395.40
5
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:59 AM)Page 10
The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment.
Date: 4/28/14 Approved by: ____________________________________
Mayor Clint Herbst
User:
Printed:04/23/2014 - 11:30AM
Ann.Zimmerman
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch:00206.04.2014 - 206.04.2014 AP
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1934 ALERT ALL CORP Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False
214030185 Fire prevention material - fire hats; badges; stickers; ect. 2,415.00 04/29/2014 101-42200-443990
2,415.00Check Total:
Vendor:3697 BEATRICE ANDERSON Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 763-295-2329 27.29 04/29/2014 655-00000-115025
27.29Check Total:
Vendor:1038 APPERTS FOOD SERVICE Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False
2099675 5.75 04/29/2014 226-45122-433300
2099675 pizzas 46.51 04/29/2014 226-45127-421460
2099675 re-sale 396.34 04/29/2014 226-45127-425410
448.60Check Total:
Vendor:1039 AQUA LOGIC INC Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True
42001 labor/supp - service chlorine pump 379.83 04/29/2014 226-45122-440800
42011 (1) 3/8" OD tubing 68.78 04/29/2014 226-45122-421610
448.61Check Total:
Vendor:3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False
43701 Credit -15.40 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
47348 re-sale 41.25 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
25.85Check Total:
Vendor:2808 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False
27556 12C003 - SCADA system upgrades for screw press 3,776.00 04/29/2014 602-00000-165010
27569 labor - well #3 signal weak, well #4 replac ed 3vdc battery ect 569.20 04/29/2014 601-49440-431990
4,345.20Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True
42532800 re sale 692.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
42532800 re sale 3,000.27 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
42532800 freight 42.59 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
42634800 re sale 986.40 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
42634800 freight 14.99 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
90006900 re-sale 236.03 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
90006900 (1) 400 #76 sack 1/6 barrel 36.65 04/29/2014 609-49754-421990
90006900 freight 1.25 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
5,010.18Check Total:
Vendor:1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False
91963 re sale 65.60 04/29/2014 609-49750-425500
91963 re sale 183.60 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
91964 re sale 783.60 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
92612 (2) 12pk drinking water 12.80 04/29/2014 226-45127-421460
92612 re-sale 282.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-425410
94844 re sale 110.50 04/29/2014 609-49750-425500
94845 re sale 435.50 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
95408 re-sale 220.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-425410
2,093.60Check Total:
Vendor:3698 NICK BLONIGEN Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund FNM-001-0935 31.46 04/29/2014 655-00000-115025
31.46Check Total:
Vendor:2535 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True
907165848 (120) flour ornage marking paint inverted 397.58 04/29/2014 656-49877-421990
907180788 (20) SLA1079 12V 7.2AH battery 474.31 04/29/2014 655-49870-421990
871.89Check Total:
Vendor:2047 BRIDGE WATER TELEPHONE COMPANY Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True
665FNMT-S-14103 Voice - monthly access charges interstate 4/13-5/12/14 415.14 04/29/2014 655-49860-430910
415.14Check Total:
Vendor:2242 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False
Lic Renewal Callsign: WRB478 - Business Radio Licensing renewal 95.00 04/29/2014 101-43127-443700
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 2
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
95.00Check Total:
Vendor:1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True
2348-103G81 Fiber/Boradband project 3,430.00 04/29/2014 655-49870-430400
2348-124G2 ZSOCCR - Monticello Soccer Club Lease 602.00 04/29/2014 101-41610-430400
2348-125G1 ZRCFOS - Church of St. Henry - Fallon Ave Improvement 35.50 04/29/2014 101-41610-430400
4,067.50Check Total:
Vendor:1801 CANNON RIVER WINERY Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True
6554 re sale 381.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
381.00Check Total:
Vendor:1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False
4/10/14 5804618-6 12.59 04/29/2014 101-45201-438300
4/10/14 5863599-6 172.24 04/29/2014 101-42700-438300
184.83Check Total:
Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False
L04003703714091 Voice - usage billing cycle 3/1-3/31/14 129.96 04/29/2014 655-49860-430910
129.96Check Total:
Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False
R72010610614091 Voice - 4/1-4/30/14 monthly access charges - intrastate 600.00 04/29/2014 655-49860-430910
600.00Check Total:
Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False
R97006006014091 Voice - 4/1-4/30/14 monthly access charges - interstate; ect. 143.25 04/29/2014 655-49860-430910
143.25Check Total:
Vendor:2476 CSI DIGITAL INC Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True
102275 utx - shipping corresponding to invoices 101955 and 101956 471.98 04/29/2014 656-00000-165010
471.98Check Total:
Vendor:1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True
1098548 re sale 9,777.19 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
1098548 re sale 104.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
1098564 re sale 1,007.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 3
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1098592 re sale 21,920.15 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
1098592 re sale 319.80 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
1103019 re sale 289.50 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
1103034 re sale 18,351.26 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
1103034 re sale 129.50 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
19358 re sale 664.60 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
19502 re sale 169.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
41814 re sale 84.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
52,816.00Check Total:
Vendor:1134 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True
746584 re sale 1,616.85 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
747604 re sale 1,369.15 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
747604 re sale 55.20 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
748703 re sale 1,544.53 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
748703 re sale 24.60 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
4,610.33Check Total:
Vendor:3677 CHARLES DEGRIO Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: True
4/13/14 refereed 4 games 4/13/14 140.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
4/16/14 refereed two games 4/16/14 70.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
4/6/14 refereed two games 4/6/14 70.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
4/9/14 refereed two games 4/9/14 70.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
350.00Check Total:
Vendor:2761 SCOTT DEMARS Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund FNM-001-0815 15.74 04/29/2014 655-00000-115025
15.74Check Total:
Vendor:1262 ANNA ECKMAN Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: True
4/10/14 mileage & meal reimb 4/4/14thru 4/9/14 (dealer runs & seminar) 54.89 04/29/2014 217-41990-433100
54.89Check Total:
Vendor:1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: True
88785 Ordinance No 591 4/3 239.98 04/29/2014 101-41310-435100
90825 12C008 - PHN - Assessment Notice 4/10 276.90 04/29/2014 400-43300-459010
516.88Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 4
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:3681 STERLING EGAN Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False
4/14/14 refereed 2 games 4/14/14 70.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
4/9/14 refereed 2 games 4/9/14 70.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
140.00Check Total:
Vendor:1167 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False
261-395 re sale 268.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
268.00Check Total:
Vendor:2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: True
4/20/14 City Hall Telephone April 2014 809.86 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 City Hall Internet April 2014 99.95 04/29/2014 702-00000-432300
4/20/14 City Hall Data Hosting Service April 2014 500.00 04/29/2014 702-00000-431990
4/20/14 City Hall TV April 2014 13.60 04/29/2014 101-41310-431990
4/20/14 City Hall Repair/Maint April 2014 250.00 04/29/2014 702-00000-440440
4/20/14 utx - MCC Telephone April 2014 657.60 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 MCC Telephone April 2014 20.01 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 MCC Cable April 2014 294.10 04/29/2014 226-45122-432500
4/20/14 MCC Internet April 2014 10.00 04/29/2014 702-00000-432300
4/20/14 utx - Ballfields Telephone April 2014 36.87 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 Ballfields Telephone April 2014 0.87 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 Ballfields Internet April 2014 69.95 04/29/2014 702-00000-432300
4/20/14 DMV Telephone April 2014 287.79 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 DMV Internet April 2014 41.95 04/29/2014 702-00000-432300
4/20/14 utx - Hi-Way Liquor Telephone April 2014 236.16 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 Hi-Way Liquor Telephone April 2014 20.17 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 Hi-Way Liquor Internet April 2014 41.95 04/29/2014 702-00000-432300
4/20/14 Fire Dept Telephone April 2014 272.11 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 Fire Dept Internet April 2014 41.95 04/29/2014 702-00000-432300
4/20/14 Animal Shelter Internet April 2014 29.95 04/29/2014 702-00000-432300
4/20/14 Public Works Telephone April 2014 370.68 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 Public Works Internet April 2014 69.95 04/29/2014 702-00000-432300
4/20/14 Parks Dept Telephone April 2014 113.21 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 Prairie Center Telephone April 2014 20.49 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 Sheriff Dept Telephone April 2014 68.53 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
4/20/14 Sheriff Dept Internet April 2014 41.95 04/29/2014 702-00000-432300
4,419.65Check Total:
Vendor:2174 FINANCE AND COMMERCE Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False
741507914 12C008 - Hillside Fm 3rd & 4th Addns - bids 231.08 04/29/2014 400-43300-459010
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 5
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
231.08Check Total:
Vendor:3476 FS2 Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: True
G78782 Bal FS2 March 2014 balance ($50 minimum) 1.00 04/29/2014 655-49860-430920
1.00Check Total:
Vendor:3699 ERIK AND NANCY GOHL Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund FNM-001-0225 13.16 04/29/2014 655-00000-115025
13.16Check Total:
Vendor:1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: True
99461 March 2014 locates 75.38 04/29/2014 656-49877-422770
99461 March 2014 locates 75.37 04/29/2014 601-49440-422770
150.75Check Total:
Vendor:1206 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False
165519 re sale 724.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
165519 freight 13.50 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
165642 re-sale 180.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
165642 freight 2.25 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
919.75Check Total:
Vendor:1242 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: True
3/18/14 motor fuel 2/19/14 - 3/18/14 528.09 04/29/2014 101-42200-421200
528.09Check Total:
Vendor:1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: False
2173500 -49.92 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
2201563 re sale 1,029.15 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
2201563 freight 3.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
982.23Check Total:
Vendor:1260 JME OF MONTICELLO INC Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: True
SYS46682 F350/Util 1 - utility box supports - remove old/weld in 2 new 287.04 04/29/2014 101-42200-440500
SYS46707 Monti Fire 03 - repair water leak on front of engine 116.08 04/29/2014 101-42200-440500
403.12Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 6
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1263 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False
1820300 re sale 793.20 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
1820300 freight 26.41 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1820301 re sale 123.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
1820952 freight 43.38 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1820952 re sale 4,118.33 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
1820953 freight 83.40 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1820953 re sale 3,029.20 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
1820953 re sale 32.25 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
1820954 re sale 62.97 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
1824030 re sale 123.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
1824031 re sale 1,165.87 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
1824031 freight 13.90 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1824032 re sale 32.25 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
1824032 re sale 1,373.90 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
1824032 freight 45.87 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1826248 re sale 1,868.75 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
1826248 freight 27.80 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1826249 freight 12.51 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1826249 re sale 364.95 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
1826912 re sale 2,821.23 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
1826912 freight 31.84 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1826913 re sale 3,099.25 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
1826913 re sale 135.68 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
1826913 freight 74.01 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1826914 re sale 20.99 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
1829554 freight 81.33 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1829554 re sale 6,650.10 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
1829555 re sale 256.95 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
1829555 freight 8.34 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
26,520.66Check Total:
Vendor:2251 KARE GANNETT CO INC Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False
275-1017 KARE March 2014 917.40 04/29/2014 655-49860-430920
917.40Check Total:
Vendor:1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False
119643 Legal Services through 3/31/14 1,071.25 04/29/2014 213-46522-430400
1,071.25Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 7
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:3700 WILLIAM AND KRISTYN KUHN Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund FNM-001-0932 10.63 04/29/2014 655-00000-115025
10.63Check Total:
Vendor:2626 HARRY LANTTO Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: True
4/1/14 4/1/14 Planning Commission mtg recording 50.00 04/29/2014 101-41910-431990
4/1/14 4/9/14 EDA mtg recording 50.00 04/29/2014 213-46301-431990
100.00Check Total:
Vendor:2304 LEGACY MECHANICAL SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False
3641 labor - plumbing service (women's bathroom toilet) 150.00 04/29/2014 226-45122-440100
150.00Check Total:
Vendor:1296 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False
00053517 (2) pivot bolts, (2) castle nuts, (2) plow bolts, ect 533.37 04/29/2014 101-43125-422100
533.37Check Total:
Vendor:1303 M AMUNDSON LLP Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: True
171916 442.98 04/29/2014 609-49750-425500
171916 re sale 561.20 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
1,004.18Check Total:
Vendor:1229 MAJIRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: True
1046 (500) business cards - B.E. 82.38 04/29/2014 655-49870-421990
1046 (.25) creative fee - FNM & city logos for facebook 21.25 04/29/2014 655-49870-431990
1046 (500) #10 envelope 157.21 04/29/2014 217-41990-420990
1046 (5000) payroll forms; (5000) a/r forms 512.30 04/29/2014 101-41520-420300
773.14Check Total:
Vendor:1308 MARCO INC Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: True
251467700 utx - LIQ portion 7.14% 4/10-5/10/14 contract 343.14 04/29/2014 702-00000-441500
251467700 utx - FNM portion 14.29% 4/10-5/10/14 contract 686.76 04/29/2014 702-00000-441500
251467700 utx - MCC portion 14.29% 4/10-5/10/14 contract 686.76 04/29/2014 702-00000-441500
251467700 4/10-5/10/14 contract 3,089.19 04/29/2014 702-00000-441500
4,805.85Check Total:
Vendor:1309 MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: False
363537 (6) ton dog food; (1) live trap; (2) pans; ect. 377.23 04/29/2014 101-42700-421990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 8
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
377.23Check Total:
Vendor:3669 MEDIA MAGNATE Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False
1194 website re-design (2/2 payments) 1,250.00 04/29/2014 226-45122-430910
1195 addtl work requested (addl pictures, text, ect) 500.00 04/29/2014 226-45122-430910
1,750.00Check Total:
Vendor:1318 JONATHAN CALEB MELLBERG Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: True
4/14/14 4/14/14 City Council mtg recording 80.00 04/29/2014 101-41110-431990
80.00Check Total:
Vendor:1330 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: True
400413004907 (137) transactions - March 2014 123.30 04/29/2014 101-42100-431990
123.30Check Total:
Vendor:2217 MLB NETWORK LLC AFFILIATE SALE Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: False
038254 MLB March 2014 291.60 04/29/2014 655-49860-430920
291.60Check Total:
Vendor:1341 MMKR Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: True
35092 Progress billing - services completed through 3/31/14 4,500.00 04/29/2014 101-41540-430100
4,500.00Check Total:
Vendor:1375 MONTICELLO PRINTING INC Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: True
3/14/14 (10) laminate weather watch instruction sheets 7.50 04/29/2014 101-42200-431990
3/3/14 utx - (200) wine tasting tickets numbered with stub 70.05 04/29/2014 609-49750-425550
77.55Check Total:
Vendor:1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: True
April 2014 Monthly appropriation 4,375.00 04/29/2014 101-45175-444310
4,375.00Check Total:
Vendor:1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False
946493-00 #226 & #227 - (2) tire & wheel asm, (2) 6-ply tires 497.63 04/29/2014 101-45201-422110
497.63Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 9
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:3422 MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: False
Voucher 10 12C003 - Voucher 10 - WWTF Sludge Dewatering Facility 5,126.73 04/29/2014 602-00000-165010
5,126.73Check Total:
Vendor:1649 NATOA NATIONAL ASSOC OF TELECOM OFFICERS AND ADVISORS Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False
2014 Mmbrship NATOA Profile ID #14214 City of Monticello 870.00 04/29/2014 655-49870-443300
870.00Check Total:
Vendor:1098 NATIONWIDE CLEC LLC Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: True
1097 March 2014 - (1.5) hr; fixed billing 2,401.50 04/29/2014 655-49870-431990
2,401.50Check Total:
Vendor:2082 NEUSTAR INC Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: True
Account: 19894 Invoice M-10706339 LNP charges 3/1-3/31/14 120.00 04/29/2014 655-49870-431990
Account: 20313 Invoice M-10706452 LNP charges 3/1-3/31/14 145.22 04/29/2014 655-49870-431990
Account: 20313 Invoice M-10706451 SOW charges 3/1-3/31/14 2.59 04/29/2014 655-49870-431990
267.81Check Total:
Vendor:1913 NEW FRANCE WINE Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False
89809 re sale 912.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
89809 freight 15.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
927.00Check Total:
Vendor:2134 NFL NETWORK Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: True
117929 NFL March 2014 699.84 04/29/2014 655-49860-430920
699.84Check Total:
Vendor:3701 ELLEN NORDBY Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 763-295-3805 79.61 04/29/2014 655-00000-115025
79.61Check Total:
Vendor:1687 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False
3642 March 2014 - TIF 1-39 400.00 04/29/2014 213-46539-431990
3643 March 2014 - TIF 1-22 480.00 04/29/2014 213-46522-431990
880.00Check Total:
Vendor:1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: True
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 10
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
48986 labor/supp - Cheleas Rd & CR 18 240v & 120v issues 275.41 04/29/2014 101-43160-431990
275.41Check Total:
Vendor:1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: False
8445128 re sale 709.66 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
8445128 freight 11.25 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
720.91Check Total:
Vendor:1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False
2584706 re sale 7,264.38 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
2584706 freight 83.86 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
2585109 freight 11.82 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
2585109 re sale 908.55 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
2585110 re sale 808.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
2585110 freight 20.85 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
2586892 re sale 437.50 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
2586892 freight 9.73 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
2588335 re sale 3,673.95 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
2588335 freight 34.75 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
2588336 freight 12.51 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
2588336 re sale 446.85 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
2588748 re sale 1,253.03 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
2588748 freight 16.21 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
2588749 re sale 2,370.45 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
2588749 freight 43.78 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
2590535 freight 60.48 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
2590535 liquor 4,770.41 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
2590536 re sale 1,443.50 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
2590536 freight 25.02 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
3524659 -242.16 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
3524737 -160.25 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
3524737 -1.39 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
23,291.83Check Total:
Vendor:1455 RED'S MARATHON Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False
03/13/14 kerosene 28.35 04/29/2014 101-43127-421300
2/27/14 motor fuel - off-road veh 809.00 04/29/2014 101-45201-421200
837.35Check Total:
Vendor:2602 RFD TV Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 11
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1991-1241 RFD TV March 2014 27.83 04/29/2014 655-49860-430920
27.83Check Total:
Vendor:1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: True
3/3-3/31/14 Mileage reimbursement 3/3-3/31/14 212.80 04/29/2014 101-42700-433100
3/3-3/31/14 Reimb 4/5/14 Target - (2) Airwick - air freshners 17.08 04/29/2014 101-42700-421990
3/3-3/31/14 Reimb 3/18/14 Petsmart - dog food; (1) kennel; (1) crate pad 238.51 04/29/2014 101-42700-421990
4/30/14 Contract 1,593.75 04/29/2014 101-42700-431200
2,062.14Check Total:
Vendor:3710 LAURIE SCHULTE Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False
4/11/14 refund continuous membership (now silver sneaker member) 93.57 04/29/2014 226-45122-347910
4/11/14 refund continuous membership (now silver sneaker member) 6.43 04/29/2014 226-00000-208100
100.00Check Total:
Vendor:3709 SELMER HOMES Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False
Refund Permit 2014-00053 issued 2/18/14 1,338.50 04/29/2014 101-42400-322110
Refund Permit 2014-00053 issued 2/18/14 4,030.00 04/29/2014 262-43180-341100
Refund Permit 2014-00053 issued 2/18/14 801.00 04/29/2014 265-43190-341100
Refund Permit 2014-00053 issued 2/18/14 127.00 04/29/2014 601-49440-371550
Refund Permit 2014-00053 issued 2/18/14 50.00 04/29/2014 101-43000-322320
Refund Permit 2014-00053 issued 2/18/14 25.00 04/29/2014 101-42400-342050
Refund Permit 2014-00053 issued 2/18/14 25.00 04/29/2014 101-41000-341070
Refund Permit 2014-00053 issued 2/18/14 35.00 04/29/2014 601-49440-322160
Refund Permit 2014-00053 issued 2/18/14 325.00 04/29/2014 601-00000-362410
Refund Permit 2014-00053 issued 2/18/14 22.34 04/29/2014 601-00000-208100
6,778.84Check Total:
Vendor:1485 SENTRY SYSTEMS INC Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: False
688810 (1) one button fob 75.00 04/29/2014 101-41940-421990
75.00Check Total:
Vendor:3675 GARY SETRUM Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False
4/13/14 refereed 2 games 4/13/14 70.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
4/6/14 refereed 2 games 4/6/14 70.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
140.00Check Total:
Vendor:3678 MORGAN SHEPHERD Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 12
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
4/10/14 refereed 4 games 4/10/14 140.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
4/13/14 refereed 4 games 4/13/14 140.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
4/6/14 refereed 4 games 4/6/14 140.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
4/9/14 refereed 4 games 4/9/14 140.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430160
560.00Check Total:
Vendor:2001 STEPHEN DAVID SORENSEN Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: False
4/17/14 structed 6 "Learn to Skate" program 3/9/14 - 4/23/14 90.00 04/29/2014 226-45127-430130
90.00Check Total:
Vendor:3688 SOURCEONE SOLUTIONS LLC Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False
4015 April billing; two (1414) insert; travel reimb thru 4/7/14 2,455.62 04/29/2014 655-49870-431990
4015 Print fold - (1) H2RYB qty 1500; (1) April coupon qty 1500 368.72 04/29/2014 655-49870-431990
4015 Postage - April billing 547.92 04/29/2014 655-49870-432200
3,372.26Check Total:
Vendor:3309 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF MINNESOTA Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False
1131083 freight 1.25 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1131083 re-sale 42.52 04/29/2014 609-49750-425500
1131084 re-sale 904.25 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
1131084 freight 14.06 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1149778 re sale 322.95 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
1149778 freight 3.75 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1152081 re sale 994.07 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
1152081 freight 9.37 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1152082 freight 27.91 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1152082 re sale 1,781.24 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
4,101.37Check Total:
Vendor:3702 MARK STORRY Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 763-314-0250 59.39 04/29/2014 655-00000-115025
59.39Check Total:
Vendor:1507 STREICHERS INC Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False
I1083293 (1) badge - Asst Chief 79.99 04/29/2014 101-42200-421990
I1083297 (1) name tag - T.F. 14.99 04/29/2014 101-42200-421990
94.98Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 13
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:3703 KENNY AND SHERYL SWANSON Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund FNM-001-0905 43.54 04/29/2014 655-00000-115025
43.54Check Total:
Vendor:1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: True
665-837-0005 Voice - nonpublished number charges 84.00 04/29/2014 655-49860-430910
84.00Check Total:
Vendor:1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: True
665-838-0000 Voice - nonpublished number charges 262.00 04/29/2014 655-49860-430910
665-838-0000 Voice - long distance charges 1.40 04/29/2014 655-49860-430910
263.40Check Total:
Vendor:1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: True
763-295-2005 17.95 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
17.95Check Total:
Vendor:1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: True
763-271-3230 100.86 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
100.86Check Total:
Vendor:1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: True
763-295-4054 46.97 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
46.97Check Total:
Vendor:1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: True
763-295-3714 329.86 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
329.86Check Total:
Vendor:1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: True
763-271-3257 90.37 04/29/2014 702-00000-432100
90.37Check Total:
Vendor:3704 JEREMY AND SANDRA TEICHER Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund FNM-001-0926 84.36 04/29/2014 655-00000-115025
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 14
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
84.36Check Total:
Vendor:1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: True
816079 re sale 35.70 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
816080 re sale 161.25 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
816081 re sale 16,147.83 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
816524 re sale 62.40 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
817407 re sale 95.90 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
817408 re sale 13,265.52 04/29/2014 609-49750-425200
29,768.60Check Total:
Vendor:1532 TRUEMAN-WELTERS INC Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: False
EB12684 106 hrs - tractor rental 1,060.00 04/29/2014 101-43125-441500
1,060.00Check Total:
Vendor:3625 ULTEIG ENGINEERS INC Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False
44325 ZTOWER - Services from 1/27-3/28/14 9,380.50 04/29/2014 101-41910-430300
9,380.50Check Total:
Vendor:1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: True
1377650 re sale 205.60 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
176124 re sale 138.20 04/29/2014 609-49750-425400
343.80Check Total:
Vendor:1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: True
96327 re sale 840.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
96327 freight 12.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
96870 re sale 106.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
96870 re sale 1,464.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
96870 freight 25.50 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
2,447.50Check Total:
Vendor:3714 RYAN WELLE Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: False
Tree Reimb (2) diseased tree reimbursement 35.00 04/29/2014 101-45201-443910
35.00Check Total:
Vendor:1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: False
6541 labor - slide pump service call 65.00 04/29/2014 226-45122-440800
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 15
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
6541 supplies - (3) contact blocks (slide pump) 123.27 04/29/2014 226-45122-440800
6547 labor - trouble shoot comm rm blinking lights 4/1 & 4/3 (8hrs) 480.00 04/29/2014 226-45122-440100
6558 labor - trouble with auto sink wiring 97.50 04/29/2014 226-45122-440440
765.77Check Total:
Vendor:1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: True
357808 re sale 944.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
357808 freight 18.15 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
58233 re sale 432.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
1,394.15Check Total:
Vendor:1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: False
498993 re sale 336.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
498993 freight 4.86 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
499085 re sale 634.50 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
499085 freight 8.34 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
983.70Check Total:
Vendor:1209 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE & SPIRITS Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: False
1080165496 re sale 1,503.13 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
1080165496 re sale 361.75 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
1080165496 freight 30.52 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
1080168177 re sale 2,026.27 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
1080168177 re sale 272.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
1080168177 freight 40.43 04/29/2014 609-49750-433300
2080033289 re sale -104.00 04/29/2014 609-49750-425300
2080035053 re sale -35.31 04/29/2014 609-49750-425100
4,094.79Check Total:
Vendor:2219 WORLD FISHING NETWORK LTD Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: True
541-1013 World Fishing Network March 2014 31.50 04/29/2014 655-49860-430920
31.50Check Total:
Vendor:2645 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: False
20501 2205 R155-010-005090 first 1/2 tax 2,014.00 04/29/2014 101-41941-437100
20656 22935 R155-010-034102 first 1/2 tax 3,321.00 04/29/2014 213-46522-443990
20658 248203 MGFARM - R155-010-034130 first 1/2 tax 2,145.00 04/29/2014 213-46522-443990
20659 248203 MGFARM - R155-010-034150 first 1/2 tax 803.00 04/29/2014 213-46522-443990
20660 248203 MGFARM - R155-010-034150 first 1/2 tax 9,920.00 04/29/2014 213-46522-443990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 16
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
20899 248203 R155-010-067010 first 1/2 tax 599.33 04/29/2014 213-46522-443990
22192 2205 R155-066-000010 first 1/2 tax 840.85 04/29/2014 101-41940-437100
22193 2205 R155-066-000020 first 1/2 tax 640.38 04/29/2014 101-41940-437100
36308 2205 R213-100-081400 first 1/2 tax 4,060.00 04/29/2014 602-49480-437100
66105 2205 R155-176-002010 first 1/2 tax (1/2) 80.88 04/29/2014 601-49440-443990
66105 2205 R155-176-002010 first 1/2 tax (1/2) 80.89 04/29/2014 655-49870-443990
67753 248203 R155-171-000060 first 1/2 tax 756.00 04/29/2014 213-46301-437100
71298 3475 P155-600-000010 first 1/2 tax 6,574.00 04/29/2014 101-41940-437100
31,835.33Check Total:
Vendor:1583 WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: True
10710177100 3/1-4/3/14 116.98 04/29/2014 602-49490-438100
10710177100 June 2014 service 19.95 04/29/2014 217-41990-431900
10710177100 June 2014 service 36.45 04/29/2014 101-45201-431900
10710177100 June 2014 service 27.95 04/29/2014 101-42200-431900
10710177100 June 2014 service 19.95 04/29/2014 601-49440-431900
10710177100 utx - June 2014 service 27.95 04/29/2014 226-45122-431900
10710177100 June 2014 service 32.95 04/29/2014 601-49440-431900
10710177100 June 2014 service 29.95 04/29/2014 601-49440-431900
10710177100 May 2014 service 48.33 04/29/2014 601-49440-431900
10710177100 12C009 - Well #4 security install - labor & equipment/parts 369.95 04/29/2014 601-00000-165010
10710177100 June 2014 service 19.95 04/29/2014 601-49440-431900
10710177100 utx - June 2014 service 27.95 04/29/2014 101-41940-431900
10710177100 June 2014 service 19.95 04/29/2014 101-45201-431900
10710177100 utx - June 2014 service 19.95 04/29/2014 609-49754-431900
10710177100 April 2014 service 85.29 04/29/2014 226-45122-431900
10710177100 utx - May 2014 service 19.95 04/29/2014 226-45122-431900
10710177100 utx - front counter equipment/parts 99.95 04/29/2014 226-45122-422100
10710177100 1,314.32 04/29/2014 101-43160-438100
2,337.72Check Total:
Vendor:1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: True
025960001 ArcGIS Upgrade 481.00 04/29/2014 101-43111-430300
1010000196 General Ph 5 2014 (2nd of 12) 7,500.00 04/29/2014 101-43111-430300
1010000196 General Ph 6 2014 - Hourly 1,381.00 04/29/2014 101-43111-430300
1010000196 General Ph 6 2014 - Frozen water services 570.00 04/29/2014 601-49440-430300
1010000196 General Ph 6 2014 - ZELMTS - Fallon Ave - All Elements 138.00 04/29/2014 101-00000-220110
101009086 State Aid Network Ph 8 72.00 04/29/2014 101-43111-430300
10102701155 Monticello Maps 1,103.00 04/29/2014 101-41910-430300
116061166 10C009 -Traffic Eng Services 2,419.50 04/29/2014 400-43300-459010
149447016 ZRCFOS - Second river Crossing Study 1,029.00 04/29/2014 101-43111-430300
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 17
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
149448028 ZRCFOS - Fallon Overpass 2,493.00 04/29/2014 101-43111-430300
149465017 12C003 - WWTF Sludge Dewater Facility & Blower Ph 4 Const 2,402.00 04/29/2014 602-00000-165010
14947208 Economic Development & Market Matching 4,000.00 04/29/2014 213-46301-430300
14947307 ZZPHOS - WWTF Facility Plan 14,580.00 04/29/2014 602-49480-430300
14947307 ZZPHOS - WWTF Facility Plan - Advanced Eng & Environ S inv 37720 940.50 04/29/2014 602-49480-430300
14947607 ZTOWER - Comm Tower - proj mgmt/coord 2,208.00 04/29/2014 101-41910-430300
14947707 ZZALDI - Aldi Plan Review 138.00 04/29/2014 101-00000-220110
14947804 ZSWPPP - MS4/SWPPP Services - Ph 02 2014 624.00 04/29/2014 101-43111-430300
14948002 10C009 - SCAH75/TH25 Intersection Improvements-Ph1 Feasibility 295.00 04/29/2014 400-43300-459010
14948302 ZBATCH - Shafer IUP 690.00 04/29/2014 101-00000-220110
14948401 ZPINE2 - Pineview 2nd Addn Plan Review 690.00 04/29/2014 101-00000-220110
14948501 ZZSRCS - Swan River School Expansion 1,349.00 04/29/2014 101-00000-220110
14948702 12C008 - Hillside Farms 3rd & 4th Public Impr 2,555.50 04/29/2014 400-43300-459010
14948801 Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment 90.75 04/29/2014 101-43111-430300
162751027 12C002 - 7th St (Elm to Minn) Ext - Precise Abstract inv 3173 600.00 04/29/2014 101-43111-430300
162751027 12C002 - 7th St (Elm to Minn) Ext 2,662.00 04/29/2014 101-43111-430300
162776013 Fenning Ave Pathway 521.00 04/29/2014 101-43111-430300
51,532.25Check Total:
Vendor:1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 103 ACH Enabled: False
4/10/14 51-0371645-4 17.45 04/29/2014 101-45201-438100
4/10/14 51-0010167229-0 12.20 04/29/2014 101-43160-438100
4/10/14 utx - 51-9348896-7 250.73 04/29/2014 101-41940-438100
4/10/14 MGFARM - 51-0517384-8 10.53 04/29/2014 213-46522-438100
4/10/14 51-4400193-4 17.20 04/29/2014 101-43160-438100
4/10/14 51-4271112-2 864.29 04/29/2014 101-45501-438100
4/10/14 51-6505909-4 155.86 04/29/2014 217-41990-438100
4/10/14 51-6505910-7 1,796.83 04/29/2014 609-49754-438100
4/10/14 51-6505911-8 1,642.72 04/29/2014 101-41940-438100
4/10/14 utx - 51-6505911-8 7,134.09 04/29/2014 226-45122-438100
4/10/14 51-6505911-8 422.41 04/29/2014 101-45175-438100
4/10/14 51-6505911-8 187.74 04/29/2014 101-42800-438100
4/11/14 utx - MGFARM - 51-0517365-5 84.91 04/29/2014 213-46522-438100
4/11/14 utx - 51-9069641-8 2,381.04 04/29/2014 655-49870-438100
4/11/14 MGFARM - 51-0592578-0 16.10 04/29/2014 213-46522-438100
4/9/14 51-7780310-4 55.72 04/29/2014 101-41940-438100
4/9/14 51-0238874-9 71.69 04/29/2014 101-43160-438100
4/9/14 51-0238890-9 78.95 04/29/2014 101-43160-438100
4/9/14 ZCULPS - 51-0623082-8 16.10 04/29/2014 213-46522-438100
4/9/14 51-6505912-9 63.85 04/29/2014 101-42700-438100
4/9/14 51-6505913-0 470.20 04/29/2014 101-42200-438100
4/9/14 51-6505907-2 72.96 04/29/2014 101-43140-438100
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 18
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
15,823.57Check Total:
Vendor:1907 XO COMMUNICATIONS LLC Check Sequence: 104 ACH Enabled: True
0266737942 Date - Internet access 4/1-4/30/14 2,197.39 04/29/2014 655-49860-430930
2,197.39Check Total:
Vendor:1907 XO COMMUNICATIONS LLC Check Sequence: 105 ACH Enabled: True
0266678736 Date - Internet access 4/1-4/30/14 5,004.87 04/29/2014 655-49860-430930
5,004.87Check Total:
Vendor:3654 YOCUM OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 106 ACH Enabled: True
624207 960.7 gallons unleaded fuel 3,836.76 04/29/2014 101-43120-421200
3,836.76Check Total:
Vendor:3705 TIM AND STACY ZAHLER Check Sequence: 107 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund FNM-001-0786 99.91 04/29/2014 655-00000-115025
99.91Check Total:
Vendor:2076 ZAYO BANDWIDTH LLC Check Sequence: 108 ACH Enabled: True
003293 4/14 4/1-4/30/14 Private Line: Cost Recovery Surcharges 2,250.01 04/29/2014 655-49860-430910
2,250.01Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
356,710.03
108
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/23/2014 - 11:30 AM)Page 19
The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment.
Date: 4/28/14 Approved by: _____________________________________
Mayor Clint Herbst
CityCouncilAgenda:4/28/2014
1
5B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments (TE)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCouncilisaskedtoratifythehiringanddeparturesofemployeesthathaveoccurred
recentlyinthedepartmentslisted.ItisrecommendedthattheCouncilofficiallyratifythe
hiring/departureofalllistedemployeesincludingpart-timeandseasonalworkers.
A1.BudgetImpact:(positionsaregenerallyincludedinbudget)
A2.StaffWorkLoadImpact:Ifnewpositions,theremaybesometraining
involved.Ifterminatedpositions,existingstaffwouldpickupthosehours,as
needed,untilreplaced.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoratifythehire/departuresoftheemployeesasidentifiedontheattached
list.
2.Motiontodenytherecommendedhiresanddepartures.
C.RECOMMENDATION:
BystatutetheCityCouncilhastheauthoritytoapproveallhires/departures.Citystaff
recommendsAlternative#1,fortheCounciltoapprovethehiresand/ordeparturesas
listed.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Listofnew/terminatedemployees
Name Title Department Hire Date Class
David Farnick Seasonal Streets Worker Streets 4/21 Seasonal
Leo Mazer Seasonal Locator FNM 4/28 Seasonal
RaeLynn Cook Finance Clerk- Payroll Finance 4/30 PT
Doug Nieters Seasonal Water and Sewer Water 5/1 Seasonal
Tim Genung Seasonal Parks Worker Parks 5/5 Seasonal
Herb Schoenborn Seasonal Parks Worker Parks 5/5 Seasonal
Jesse Niebolte Seasonal Parks Worker Parks 5/5 Seasonal
Austin Johnson Seasonal Parks Worker Parks 5/19 Seasonal
Robert Olson Seasonal Parks Worker Parks 6/9 Seasonal
Name Reason Department Last Day Class
Kristi Clouthier Voluntary MCC 3/27 PT
NEW EMPLOYEES
TERMINATING EMPLOYEES
New Hire and Terms City Council 2014: 4/22/2014
CityCouncilAgenda:4/28/14
1
5C.Considerationofapprovinganapplicationfortemporaryon-saleliquorlicensefor
theMonticelloLionsClubfortheirBrewfesteventonAugust16,2014 (CS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheMonticelloLionsClubisrequestingapprovalofanapplicationfora1-daytemporary
on-saleliquorlicenseonAugust16,2014fortheirannualBrewfestevent.TheLions
ClubwillbesettinguptheeventinWestBridgePark,locatedat107WestRiverStreet.
TheLionsClubhasprovidedacertificateofinsuranceforthisevent.TheLionsClubhas
alsosubmittedanapplicationforaspecialeventpermitforuseofWestBridgePark.
CityCouncilisrequiredtoapprovetemporaryliquorapplicationspriortosendingthem
totheStateAlcoholandGamblingDivisionforapproval.
A1.BudgetImpact:None
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:MinimalstafftimetosendapplicationtoStateAlcohol
andGamblingDivisionforapproval.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovetheapplicationforatemporaryliquorlicenseforthe
MonticelloLionsonAugust16,2014atWestBridgePark,contingenton
receivingacertificateofliquorliabilityinsurance.
2.Donotapprovetheapplicationforatemporaryliquorlicense.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1forapprovaloftheapplication.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Applicationfortemporaryliquorlicense
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
1
5D.ConsiderationofapprovingaSpecialEventPermitallowingexclusiveuseofWest
BridgeParkandrelatedassistanceinconjunctionwiththeBrewfesteventon
August16,2014.Applicant:MonticelloLionsClub (PW/AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityCouncilisaskedtoconsiderapprovalofaspecialeventpermitfortheBrewfest
event,acraftbeer-tastingfundraiserorganizedbytheMonticelloLionsClub.Therequest
hasseveralassociatedconsiderations:
a)ApprovalforuseofWestBridgeParkfrom7:00AM–10:00PM
b)Approvaloftheuseofcityparkinglotsinthedowntownarea
c)Approvalforcitystaffassistanceforpreparationandset-up
d)ClosureofportionsofW.RiverStandWalnutSt.
Thisadult-orientedcommunityeventisproposedtooccurSaturday,August16th,2014,
from3to7p.m.,andisbeingpromotedandheldincooperationwitheligibleMinnesota
craftbrewvendorsandlocalfoodvendors.Brewfestorganizersareexpecting120brew
typesat45tables,7localrestaurantvendors,andanattendanceof1500persons.
Asitemapfrom2013illustratingtheproposedconfigurationofdisplayspacesis
includedinthesupportingdata.Brewfestrepresentativeshaveindicatedthattheset-up
fortheparkwillbeverysimilartolastyear’sevent.Asaconditionofapproval,afinal
siteplanisrequested.TheParksSuperintendenthasalsorequestedthattheBrewfest
Committeeprovideadvancenotificationforrequestedparkingareaclosures.Asa
conditionofapproval,theBrewfestCommitteewillbeaskedtocoordinatewiththeParks
SuperintendentandStreetsSuperintendentforsiteplanningandparkingcoordination.
Asillustratedinthesiteplan,theeventisproposedtobelocatedinWestBridgePark.
EventattendeeswouldaccesstheParkfromdifferentlocationsnearby,withrestricted
pointsofentryintotheeventareaitself.TheBrewfestCommitteeindicatesinthe
attachedapplicationnarrativethattheeventareawithintheparkwillbesectionedoff
withtemporaryfencinginordertorestrictthepointofentrytothoseover21yearsofage,
asthiseventwillbelimitedtoonlythosepersonsover21holdinganeventticket.The
LionsClubwillberesponsibleforplacementoffencingaroundtheparkperimeterand
forsignageattheparkinglots,withsnowfenceandpostsprovidedbytheCityasis
available.Uponapprovalofthepermit,theStreetsDepartmentwillplaceasignatWest
BridgeParkindicatingthattheentireparkwillbeclosedforprivateuseonAugust16th
andtherewouldbenoaccesstotheparkplaygroundonAugust16th.TheParks
Commissiondidnothaveanopportunitytoreviewthispermitapplicationfor2014
recommendation,buthassupportedthepermitinpastyears.
TheBrewfestCommitteeisseekingCityassistanceforprovidingbarricades,cones,
picnictables,andset-upofthoseitems.TheCommitteehasarrangedfordumpster
serviceandgarbagecartsandisalsoarrangingforportablebathroomstobebroughtinto
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
2
theParkfortheevent.TheCommitteehasrequesteduseoftheparkfrom7:00AM–
10:00PMtoaccommodateset-up,clean-upandtear-downbyLionsClubmembers.
Aswiththe2013event,PublicWorksstaffhasproposedaplantoblockoffsomestreets
intheareaofWestBridgeParkinordertocontroltrafficflowintoandoutofthepark
vicinity.AnyapprovaliscontingentoncoordinationwiththeStreetsDepartmentand
WrightCountySherriff’sOfficeforfinaltrafficcontrolandstreetclosures.Amapofthe
proposedclosureshasbeenpreparedbytheStreetSuperintendentandisattachedfor
reference.
TheBrewfesteventwillincludeabandwithbluegrasstypeofmusicforbackground
listening.Itisnotanticipatedthatthiswouldcreateanyconcernsaboutsoundorvolume.
However,theLionsClubisbeingaskedtoprovideadvancenoticeoftheeventto
surroundinghomesandbusinesseswithina2-blockradius.
TheMonticelloLionsClubisrequiredtoobtaininsurancetocovertheeventandits
activities,includingliquorliabilitycoverage,withtheCitynamedassecondinsured.The
LionsClubisresponsibleforverifyingthatindividualfoodandbeveragevendorshave
theappropriateinsurancecoverageandstatepermits.TheLionsClubisexpectedto
providesecurityfortheeventthroughtheWrightCountySheriff’sDepartment.
TheMonticelloLionsClubhassubmittedanapplicationforatemporaryliquorlicense
whichisneededtohostthisevent.Approvalforthisapplicationisincludedasaseparate
agendaitemforthecouncilmeeting.
Brewfestisdesignedtobeafundraiserforthisnon-profitorganization.Thegrouphas
indicatedthattheLionswereabletogivebackapproximately$30,000tothecommunity
asadirectresultoflastyear’sBrewfestevent.
A1.BudgetImpact:None.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:TheLionsClubisrequestingCityassistancefor
deliveryandpick-upofbarricades,cones,andpicnictables.Thesewillbe
deliveredtothesiteandpickedupduringregularstaffhoursbytheParks
Department(estimated16hours).TheStreetSuperintendentwillalsoprepareand
provideasiteplanforbarricadeandconeplacement.TheStreetsDepartmentwill
beresponsibleforplacingandremovingallstreetbarricadesandsignage
(estimated12hours).
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoapprovetheSpecialEventPermitallowingtemporaryuseofWest
BridgeParkfortheMonticelloLionsBrewfesteventfrom7a.m.to10p.m.on
Saturday,August16th,2014,includingCityassistance,useofmunicipalparking
lotsandstreetclosuresasdescribedinthestaffreportofApril28th,2014;
contingenton:
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
3
a.Finalsiteplansubmittalandcontinuedsiteplanandparkinguse
coordinationwiththeStreetSuperintendentandParkSuperintendent.
b.AppropriatesignageandfencingincoordinationwiththeStreetandPark
Superintendents.
c.Verificationofnotificationofaffectedlocalbusinessesandresidents
withina2-blockradiusoftheParkbypermitholder,nolaterthantwo
weekspriortoevent.
d.NotificationandeventcoordinationwithWrightCountySheriff’sOffice.
e.ProvideaCertificateofInsurancefortheevent,includingliquorand
generalliability,withtheCitynamedasasecondinsured.
2.MotiontodenySpecialEventPermitforBrewfesteventonAugust16th,2014.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffsupportsAlternative#1above.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.Application&Narrative–LionsClub
B.WestBridgeParksitedrawing,2013
C.AerialSiteImageshowingproposedstreetandparkinglotclosures,2014
3RDSTW.
ONE
WAY
PATHWAY
CLOSED
A-FRAME
BARRICADEROADCLOSED
AHEAD
ROAD
CLOSED
ONE
WAY
ROADCLOSED
AHEAD
ROADCLOSED
AHEAD
A
-
F
R
A
M
E
B
A
R
R
I
C
A
D
E
A-FRAMEBARRICADE
A-FRAMEBARRICADEA-FRAMEBARRICADE
ROADCLOSEDTOTHRU
TRAFFIC
ROADCLOSED
AHEAD
ROADCLOSEDAHEAD BREW-FESTPARKING
2014MONTICELLO
BREW-FEST
RIVERSTW.
RIVERSTE.
CEDARST
BROADWAYSTE.
BROADWAYSTW.
WALNUTST
FRONTST
LINNST
LINNST
WALNUTST
HWY25
HWY25
WESTBRIDGEPARK
EASTBRIDGEPARK
RIVERSTW.
BROADWAYSTW.
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
1
5E.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-040acceptingimprovementsand
authorizingfinalpaymenttoGertkenBrothers,Inc.fortheGreatRiverTrailways
andTrailheadImprovements,CityProjectNo.10C010 (SB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheGreatRiverTrailwaysandTrailheadImprovementwassubstantiallycompletein
2013,withtheprojectfinaldocumentationrecentlysubmitted.Finalacceptanceand
retainagehadbeenwithhelduntilGertkenBrothershadsubmittedthesedocuments.
Theprojectconsistedofconstructingatrailheadandthreetrailsegmentsthatconnectto
theexistingpedestrianunderpassatCSAH75asshownontheenclosedmap.Several
pedestriansandbicyclistshavebeenusingthetrailsystemandtrailheadsince
constructionwascompletelastsummerandtheCityhasreceivedpositivefeedbackfrom
trailusers.
Trailsegment3,whichwasproposedtocrosstheBNSFrailroadwasnotconstructed,as
BNSFdeniedtherequesttoallowthistrailcrossing.Thistrailsegmentwouldconnectthe
underpasstotheXcel/CityballfieldcomplexandprovideconnectionsbetweenXcel’s
trainingfacilityandthepowerplantsitefortheiremployees.XcellobbiedBNSFto
allowthecrossing;however,wasunsuccessfulatthistime.Asaresult,theCitywillnot
beabletousethe$20,016inDNRgrantfundsthatwouldhavepartiallyfundedthistrail
segment.StaffandXcelwillcontinuetofindalternatesolutionstoprovidethis
connectioninthefuture.
TheCouncilisbeingrequestedtoaccepttheprojectascompleteandapprovefinal
paymenttoGertkenBrother’sintheamountof$20,099.37.
Thefinalpaymentrequestrepresentsthefinalquantitiescompletedonthecontractand
thereleaseoftheretainageonthecontract.Thefinalconstructioncosttotaled
$277,537.43.Theoriginalcontractamountwas$271,074.22.Theincreasein
constructioncostwasduetoadditionalexcavationinthepondareasthatwascompleted
togenerategranularfillmaterialforthetrailconstruction.Excesstopsoilwasgenerated
withtheprojectgradingoperationsthatwasnotsuitablematerialfortrailfill.Thepond
areaswereminedtogeneratesuitabletrailfillmaterialandthenfilledbackinwiththe
topsoilmaterial.Thealternatemethodtothiswouldhavebeentohaulingranularborrow
fromanoff-sitesourcewhichwouldhavebeenmorecostly.Theadditionalexcavation
waswithinthescopeoftheproject,sodidnotrequireachangeorder.
Allpunchlistitemsassembledforthisprojecthavebeencompleted,andWSB&
Associates,Inc.,theCityParkSuperintendentandtheWrightCountyParks
Administratorareindicatingtheprojectiscompleteandreadyforfinalpaymentin
accordancewiththecontractandCityofMonticelloEngineeringandConstruction
Standards.
Thefollowingpaperworkhasbeensubmittedforfinalpaymenttobereleased:
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
2
1.Alldocumentationrequiredforfederallyfundedprojects.
2.Satisfactoryshowingthatthecontractorhascompliedwiththeprovisionsof
MinnesotaStatutes290.92requiringwithholdingstateincometax(IC134
forms).
3.Evidenceintheformofanaffidavitthatallclaimsagainstthecontractorby
reasonsofthecontracthavebeenfullypaidorsatisfactorilysecured(lien
waivers).
4.ConsentofSuretytoFinalPaymentcertificationfromthecontractor’ssurety.
5.Two-yearmaintenancebond.Itshouldbenotedthatthemaintenancebond
willstartandextendtwoyearfromthedateoffinalacceptanceoftheproject
bytheCityCouncil.
A1.BudgetImpact:Theconstructioncostfortheprojecttotals$277,537.43andis
fundedthroughdonationsfromXcelEnergy,DNRtraillocalandregionaltrail
connectiongrants,FederaltransportationenhancementgrantsandtheCity’s
CapitalProjectsFundassummarizedbelow:
Federalfunds:$157,700.00
DNRfunds:$103,111.00
XcelEnergy(forsignmonument):$700.00
CapitalProjectsFund:$16,026.43
ItshouldbenotedthatXcelEnergy,AdvancedDisposalandLandofLakesChoir
Boyspreviouslyprovideddonationstofundtheunderpassthatwasconstructedin
2011withtherealignmentofCSAH75.Formalrecognitionofthesedonationsis
identifiedatthesignageprovidedatthetrail-headfacility.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Impactstostaffworkloadareminimalandroutinefor
theproject.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2014-040acceptingimprovementsandauthorizing
finalpaymentof$20,099.37toGertkenBrothersforGreatRiverTrailwaysand
TrailheadImprovements,CityProjectNo.10C010.
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2014-040atthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsselectingAlternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Resolution#2014-040
ProjectMap
WSBLetterofRecommendation&ConstructionPayVoucherNo.4(Final)
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-040
ACCEPTINGIMPROVEMENTSANDAPPROVINGFINALPAYMENTON
GREATRIVERTRAILWAYSANDTRAILHEADIMPROVEMENTS
CITYPROJECT10C010
WHEREAS,pursuanttoawrittencontractwhichtheCityofMonticelloawardedtoGertken
Brothers,Inc.ofRichmond,Minnesota,thecontractorhassatisfactorilycompletedtheworkforthe
GreatRiverTrailwaysandTrailheadimprovementsandappurtenantworkinaccordancewiththe
contract;
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYOFMONTICELLO,MINNESOTA that
theworkcompletedundersaidcontractisherebyacceptedandapprovedandthattheMayorandCity
Clerkareherebydirectedtoissueaproperorderforthefinalpaymentonsuchcontractsubjectto
receiptofthefollowing:
1)Alldocumentationrequiredforfederally-fundedprojects;
2)SatisfactoryshowingthatthecontractorhascompliedwiththeprovisionsofMinnesotaStatutes
290.92requiringwithholdingstateincometax(IC134forms);
3)Evidenceintheformofanaffidavitthatallclaimsagainstthecontractorbyreasonsofthe
contracthavebeenfullypaidorsatisfactorilysecured(lienwaivers);
4)ConsentofSuretytoFinalPaymentcertificationfromthecontractor’ssurety;and
5)Twoyearmaintenancebond,whichshallstartandextendtwoyearsfromthedateofacceptance
oftheprojectbytheCityCouncil.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncil,this28th dayofApril,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
___________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
1
5F.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-039approvingaFinalStagePlanned
UnitDevelopmentadjustmentforSunsetPondsTownhomesentrancemonuments.
Applicant:SunsetPondsITownhomeAssociation (AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheSunsetPondsITownhomeAssociationhasrequestedaFinalStagePUDAdjustment
toallowtheplacementoftwoareaidentificationsignsatthenorthandsouthentrance
pointstoitstownhomeareaatSunsetPonds.
TheMonticelloZoningOrdinanceallowsforPUDadjustmentstobeapprovedbya
simplemajorityofCouncilinsuchcircumstanceswhentheadjustmentdoesnot
“eliminate,diminishorcompromisethehighqualityofsiteplanning”.Inthiscase,the
applicantisseekingtoenhanceandidentifytheentrancelocationofthetownhome
portionoftheSunsetPondsdevelopmentthroughlandscapedareaidentificationsignage.
TheMonticelloZoningOrdinance,Section4.5(J)allowsforonesuchareaidentification
sign,nottoexceed42squarefeetinareaand8feetinheight.Theapplicanthasproposed
twosignsat42squarefeeteachandsixfeetinheight.AsSunsetPondsisaplannedunit
development,twosignscanbeaccommodatedviatheflexibilityallowedforplannedunit
developments.
Theproposedlocationsfortheareaidentificationsignareatthesoutheastcornerof93rd
StreetandGoodrichDriveandthenorthwestcornerof91st StreetNEandHaugAvenue.
Sign#1onthesoutheastcornerofGoodrichand93rdlieswithinaUnitedPowerutility
lineeasementandassuch,theapplicantwasrequiredtogainwrittenpermissionfrom
thateasementholdertoplacetheproposedsign.UPA’slineisnowGreatRiverEnergy
andGREhasprovidedpermissionforsigninstallationasproposed.
Inaddition,bothsignsareproposedtobelocatedonlotswhich,whileownedand
maintainedbytheSunsetPonds1TownhomeAssociation,arecoveredbyCitydrainage
andutilityeasements.Therefore,theapplicantwillalsoberequiredtoenterintoa
encroachmentagreementwiththeCity.Adraftoftheencroachmentagreementis
attachedforreference.Theapplicanthasprovidedasurveyofthesignlocationareas,
includingutilities,forreview.ThePublicWorksDepartmentandCityEngineerhave
reviewedtheproposedsignplacementrelativetothesurveydrawingsandfindnoissue
withtheproposedplacementrelativetodrainageandutilitypurposesandutilitiesinthe
area.
Theapplicant’ssketchesdetailtheproposedsetbacksforthesignsat16’0fromthe
propertyline.Byordinance,thesignsmustbesetback15’fromtheallpropertylines.
Theapplicantthereforecomplieswiththe15’setbackregulation.
Theapplicant’snarrativeindicatesthattheareaaroundeachsignwillbeplantedwith
coniferoustreesorshrubs,alongwithavarietyofsmallerperennialshrubs.
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
2
Theapplicanthasprovideddocumentationfromtherecordedprivatehomeowner’s
agreementwhichincludesreferencestothe“CommonElements”fortheproperty.The
proposedlocationofthesignsisincludedwithintheCommonElementareasofthe
associationandarethereforerequiredtobemaintainedpertheassociationdocuments.
Theapplicanthasfurtherclarifiedvianarrativethatmaintenance,includingregular
painting,willbeincludedinbudgetedCommonExpensecapitalcosts.Inaddition,the
landscapingforthesignswillbeincludedinthegroundscaremaintenancecontractfor
theassociation.
ItshouldbenotedthattherearetwoassociationsforthetownhomeareaatSunsetPonds,
eachrepresentingdistinctlandareas.Theproposedsignsaretobelocatedonlandowned
andgovernedundertheSunsetPondsITownhomeAssociation.Itisfeasiblethatthe
secondassociationcouldsubmitafuture,similarrequestfortheentranceat93rd Street
andGoldenPondLane.SuchrequestwouldbeconsideredunderthesameCityprocess.
A1.BudgetImpact:None.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Limitedtoreviewoftheapplicationandpreparationof
licenseagreement,whicharecoveredbythesubmittedescrowfortheapplication.
Signpermitwillbereviewedunderseparateapplication.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution2014-039approvinganamendmentforFinalStage
PlannedUnitDevelopmentAdjustmentforSunsetPondsTownhomesentrance
monumentsandassociatedencroachmentagreement,subjecttotheConditionsin
ExhibitZ.
2.Motionofother.
3.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1.Theadditionoflandscapedareaidentification
signsfortheSunsetPondstownhomearearepresentsanenhancementofthedevelopment
promotingaesthetically-pleasingdesignwithintheneighborhoodwhichwillappear
attractiveandinvitingfromsurroundingparcels.Theapplicationisthereforeconsistent
withtheCity’sgoalsforplannedunitdevelopment.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
ExhibitZ–ConditionsofApproval
A.Resolution#2014-039
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
3
B.ApplicantNarrative
C.TownhomeAssociationDocuments
D.LocationSurvey
E.SiteLocationSitePlan
F.SignIllustration
G.EncroachmentAgreement(draft)
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
4
EXHIBITZ
ConditionsofApproval
FinalStagePUDAdjustment–SunsetPonds
1.ApplicantprovidedocumentationfromUnitedPower(orsuccessor)thatproposedsign
placementwithinitspowerlineeasementispermitted.
2.ApplicantenterintoalicenseagreementwiththeCityofMonticelloforencroachment
intotheCity’sdrainageandutilityeasements.
3.Signplansshallbesubmittedforpermitsinaccordancewithsignordinanceallowances
andprocessing,withtheallowancefortwoareaidentificationsigns.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-039
APPROVINGAFINALSTAGEPLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENTADJUSTMENT
FORSUNSETPONDSITOWNHOMESENTRANCEMONUMENTS
WHEREAS,theCityofMonticellohasadoptedazoningordinanceprovidingforthe
regulationofplannedunitdevelopment;and
WHEREAS,theparcel(s)subjecttothisrequestareincludedwithintheapprovedplannedunit
developmentforSunsetPonds;and
WHEREAS,theapplicanthasrequestedanadjustmenttoplannedunitdevelopmenttoallow
theplacementoftwoareaidentificationsignswithintheplannedunitdevelopment;and
WHEREAS,theCityCounciloftheCityofMonticellofindsthattheadjustmenttoPUD
representsanenhancementofthedevelopmentpromotingaesthetically-pleasingdesignwithin
theneighborhoodwhichwillappearattractiveandinvitingfromsurroundingparcels;and
WHEREAS,theCityCounciloftheCityofMonticellofindsthattheadjustmenttoPUDis
consistentwiththeCity’sgoalsforplannedunitdevelopmentforSunsetPonds;
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCityCounciloftheCityof
Monticello,MinnesotaherebyapprovestheadjustmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopmentfor
SunsetPonds,subjecttothefollowingconditions:
1.ThatApplicantenterintoalicenseagreementwiththeCityofMonticellofor
encroachmentintotheCity’sdrainageandutilityeasements.
2.Signplansshallbesubmittedforpermitsinaccordancewithsignordinanceallowances
andprocessing,withtheallowancefortwoareaidentificationsigns.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncil this28th dayofApril,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
1
(reservedforrecordinginformation)
ENCROACHMENTAGREEMENT
AGREEMENT madethis_______dayof_____________,20___,byandbetweenthe CITY
OFMONTICELLO,aMinnesotamunicipalcorporation("City"),and
______________________________________________________________("Owner").
1.BACKGROUND.OwneristhefeeownerofcertainpropertylocatedwithintheCityof
Monticello,CountyofWright,StateofMinnesotalegallydescribedasfollows:
155-0159-009060
Lot6,Block9,SunsetPonds,accordingtotherecordedplatthereof
And
155-159-008270
Lot27,Block8,SunsetPonds,accordingtotheplatthereof
whichshallbeknownforthepurposesofthisagreementasthe"subjectproperties".TheCityowns
easementsfordrainageandutilitypurposesoverportionsofthesubjectpropertiesasshownonthe
attachedExhibit“A”.Theapplicantproposestoplaceoneareaidentificationsignstructureandassociated
landscapingoneachofthesubjectpropertieswhichencroachesintotheCity'seasementareasasdepicted
ontheattachedExhibit“B”.
2
2.ENCROACHMENTAUTHORIZATION.TheCityherebyapprovestheencroachment
initseasementareasfortheconstruction,use,andmaintenanceoftheareaidentificationsignstructure
andassociatedlandscapingasdepictedontheattachedExhibit“B”.
3.MAINTENANCE.Ownershallberesponsibleforallcostsrelatingtoconstruction,
reconstruction,maintenance,andrepair,includingsnowremoval,withrespecttotheareaidentification
signstructuresandassociatedlandscaping.Thismaintenanceagreementisapersonalobligationof
Ownerandshallbebindingupontheexecutors,administrators,successors,heirsandassignsofOwner.
4.HOLDHARMLESSANDINDEMNITY.Inconsiderationofbeingallowedto
encroachintheCity'seasementareas,Owner,its/theirsuccessors,heirsandassigns,herebyagree(s)to
indemnifyandholdtheCityharmlessfromallcostsandexpenses,claimsandliability,including
reasonableattorney'sfees,relatingtoorarisingoutofthisgranttoOwnerofpermissiontoencroachinthe
City'seasementareasfortheconstruction,reconstruction,maintenance,use,operation,andthelikeofthe
areaidentificationsignstructuresandassociatedlandscaping.
5.TERMINATION.IftheCitydeterminesthattheareaidentificationsignstructuresor
associatedlandscapinginterfereswiththeuse,maintenanceorrepairoftheCity’sutilitieswithinthe
easementareas,OwneruponrequestbytheCityshallremoveandreplacetheinterferenceatits/theirsole
expense.IfOwnerfailstoremovetheinterferenceinthetimeframerequiredbytheCity,theCitymay
removetheareaidentificationsignstructuresandassociatedlandscapingandshallhavenoobligationfor
damagesto,orrepairorreplacementoftheareaidentificationsignsorlandscapingremovedbytheCity.
Further,theOwnerconsentstotheCitylevyinganassessmentagainstthesubjectpropertiesfortheCity’s
costs.
IfOwnerfailstomaintaintheareaidentificationsignstructuresorassociatedlandscapingorfails
toremoveandreplaceanyinterferenceasprovidedinthisparagraph,theCitymay,atitssolediscretion,
3
terminatethisAgreementbygivingthecurrentownerofthesubjectpropertythirty(30)daysadvance
writtennotice,exceptthatnonoticeperiodwillberequiredinthecaseofanemergencyconditionas
determinedsolelybytheCityandtheAgreementmaythenbeterminatedimmediately.
TheCitymayunilaterallyterminatethisAgreementiftheareaidentificationsignstructuresor
associatedlandscapingwithanymaintenanceorimprovementswithintheCity’seasementareasas
determinedbytheCity.
6.RECORDING.ThisAgreementshallberecordedagainstthetitletothesubjectproperty
andshallbebindinguponOwner,its/theirassigns,heirsandsuccessorsininterest.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
BY:_________________________________
(SEAL)ClintHerbst,Mayor
AND________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOFWRIGHT)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis_______dayof______________,
20___,byClintHerbstandbyJeffO’Neill,respectivelytheMayorandCityAdministratoroftheCityof
Monticello,aMinnesotamunicipalcorporation,onbehalfofthecorporationandpursuanttotheauthority
grantedbyitsCityCouncil.
____________________________________
4
NOTARYPUBLIC
5
PROPERTYOWNER:
_____________________________________
_____________________________________
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOF_________)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis_______dayof
____________________,20___,by_______________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________.
____________________________________
NOTARYPUBLIC
THISINSTRUMENTDRAFTEDBY:
CityofMonticello
505WalnutSt.Suite1
Monticello,MN55362
(763)271-3224
AMS
6
EXHIBIT“A”
SKETCHOF CITY DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTS
7
EXHIBIT“B”
SKETCH DEPICTING
AREAIDENTIFICATIONSIGNSTRUCTURESORASSOCIATEDLANDSCAPING
CityCouncilAgenda:4/28/14
1
7A.PublicHearing-ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-041ordering
improvementsandconsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-042approvingan
assessmentrollforHillsideFarm3rd and4th AdditionPublicImprovements,City
ProjectNo.12C008 (SB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
OnMarch24,2014,theCouncilacceptedplansandspecifications,authorized
advertisementforbids,calledfortheImprovementandAssessmenthearingsandordered
preparationoftheassessmentrollfortheHillsideFarm3rd and4th AdditionsPublic
Improvements.Thepublicimprovementswereoriginallyintendedtobecompletedby
theprojectdeveloper,TrisonDevelopment.However,thedeveloperhasdefaultedonthe
propertiesandthe47vacantlotsarecurrentlyintaxforfeitureandintheStateof
Minnesota’sname.TheWrightCountyAuditor’sOfficehasrecentlyindicatedthatit
intendstoauctionthepropertiesinmidtolatesummerof2014.
Theremainingpublicimprovementsincludethefinalliftofpavementonthe
development’sinternalstreets,sidewalkconstructionalongDeerStreetandBison
Avenue,utilityadjustments,clustermailboxplacement,trailconstructionalongFenning
Avenueadjacenttothedevelopment,internaltrailextensionnorthofDeerStreetonthe
eastsideofthedevelopment,installationofconservationeasementposts,siltfence
removal,cleanup,andotherassociatedappurtenantwork.
TheprojectwasbidonApril7,2014withASTECHCorporationofSt.Cloud,MN
submittingthelowbidforthisprojectintheamountof$154,568.25.Moredetailonthe
bidresultsisincludedwithagendaitem#7B.
Theintentoftheprojectprocessistoconductthepublichearings,adoptanassessment
rolltobecertifiedtotheCounty,andawardacontractforconstructionpriortothe
Countyauctioningofthelots.Procedurally,perMNStateStatuesChapter429relating
tospecialassessments,theCitycantakeaction,inthefollowingorder,tomoveforward
withcompletingtheproject:
1.ConductanImprovementandAssessmentHearing
2.Ordertheproject
3.AdopttheAssessmentRoll
4.Awardtheconstructioncontract(seeagendaitem#7B)
Thetotalprojectcostasestimatedinthefeasibilityreportwas$226,780.Thetotal
estimatedprojectcostbasedonthebidsreceivedis$208,000.Thesecostsincludean
approximate10%contingencyand22%indirectcosts.
Theprojectisproposedtobefundedthroughspecialassessmentsto47vacantlotswhich
benefitfromtheimprovements.Publicationoftheimprovementandassessmenthearing
andmailednoticestotheaffectedpropertyowners(StateofMinnesota,c/oWright
CountyAuditor)hasbeencompletedtosatisfytherequirementsforpublicimprovement
projectsinaccordancewithMinnesotaStatutesChapter429.Affectedpropertyowners
CityCouncilAgenda:4/28/14
2
willhaveanopportunitytoobjecttotheirassessmentpriortoorattheassessment
hearing.Objectionsmustbemadeinwriting.WrightCountyhasindicatedthatdonot
objecttoincludingtheseassessmentsinthetaxforfeitparcelvalues.
Proposedassessmentsforthisimprovementprojectareestimatedat$4,425foreachlot,
andareproposedtobecertifiedtotheCountypriortotheauctioningofthelotslaterthis
summer.FollowingadoptionofthenewassessmentrollbyCouncil,theCitywillcertify
thespecialassessmentstotheCountyAuditorinearlyMay.TheCountyisrequiredto
addthevalueofthenewspecialassessmentstothevalueofthelotthatisestablishedfor
thepublicauction.Thisisthestartingbidpriceattheauction.Allproceedsfromthe
auctionarepooled;however,thespecialassessmentsonpurchasedlotsaretakenoutand
paiddirectlytothejurisdictionwhichcertifiedtheassessments.
Whenaparcelbecomestaxforfeit,previously-certifiedspecialassessmentsarecancelled
bytheCounty.HillsideFarm3rd and4th Additionshadunpaidbalancesremainingonthe
specialassessmentswhentheywerecancelledfortaxforfeiture.LotsinHillside3rd have
anunpaidbalanceof$8,960.99andlotsinHillside4th haveanunpaidbalanceof
$12,072.26.Thesepastdueamountsarenotspecificallyincludedinthestartingvalueof
thelotsupforpublicauction,andtheCitymaynotreceivepaymentfromtheauction
proceedsontheseassessments.However,theCityhastheabilitytoreassessthe
cancelledassessmentbalancesoncethelotshavebeensoldandarereturnedtothetax
rolls.AtthetimetheCountysetsavaluationhearingfortheparcels,theCitywill
communicatethisintentinwritingforhearingpurposes.TheCountyisobligatedto
informbuyersofthepotentialforreassessmentofunpaidassessmentsandbuyerswillbe
encouragedtocontacttheCityinthisregard.
Typically,assessmentsarecertifiedafterconstructionissubstantiallycompleteandfinal
projectcostsareidentified.Inthiscase,theCitywillcertifytheassessmentspriorto
constructionandtheauctioningofthelotstoensuretheywillbepaidwiththelotsaleat
auction.Thisprojectisnotcomplexandwewouldnotanticipatetheprojectcoststobe
abovetheassessmentamountcertified.Ifthefinalprojectcostsarebelowthecertified
assessmentamount,anewassessmenthearingcanbeheldadjustingtheassessment
amounttoaloweramountforthebenefittingproperties.Thisamountcouldreducethe
startingvalueifcertifiedpriortothecountyauction,orcouldbeusedasacreditagainst
theamountthatwouldbereassessedforpreviousunpaidassessments,orcouldbe
refundedtothebuyer(s).
ConstructionisplannedtobecompletebyAugust,2014.
A1.BudgetImpact:Theestimatedprojectscostis$208,000basedonthebids
received,whichincludesconstructioncosts,10%contingencyand22%indirect
costs.Thisisanunbudgetedimprovementproject.Thisestimateresultsin
approximately$4,425innewspecialassessmentstoeachundevelopedlot.
StaffrecommendsusingtheCapitalProjectFundtofundtheprojectupfront,
withthatsourcebeingpaidbackvialotsalerevenue.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Minimaltimeisanticipatedtocertifytheassessments.
CityCouncilAgenda:4/28/14
3
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
Decision#1:OrdertheProject
1.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-041orderingtheimprovementsfor
HillsideFarm3rd &4th AdditionsPublicImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C008.
Itshouldbenotedthatthisactionrequiresasupermajorityvote,which
correspondstoatleastfourcouncilvotes.
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2014-041atthistime.
Decision#2:AdoptAssessmentRoll
1.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-042approvinganassessmentrollfor
HillsideFarm3rd &4th AdditionPublicImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C008
andcertifyingtheassessmentrolltotheCountyAuditorforplacementonthetax
forfeitparcels.
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2014-042atthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1.Itiscriticaltothebuild-outofthese
lotsandthecompletionoftheHillsideFarmdevelopmentthatthepublicimprovements
becompletedfortheseparcels.TheCityAttorneyhasrecommendedcompletionofthe
improvementswhilethereisoneownerandwehavetheabilitytocompletetheproject
priortodemandforbuild-out.
ItshouldbenotedthattheCityhadpreviouslyfiledanAffidavitofDefaultagainstthe
Hillside3rd and4th Additionasrelatedtotheseimprovements,puttingthedeveloperand
anyfuturepurchaseroflotsonnoticethatthedeveloperhadnotmettherequiredtermsof
thedevelopmentagreementforHillsideFarm3rd and4th Additions.Thisdefault,andthe
incompletenatureofthedevelopment,rendersthelotsinthetwoadditionsunbuildable
untilsuchtimeastherequiredimprovementsarecompleted.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Resolution#2014-041–OrdertheImprovements
Resolution#2014-042–AdoptAssessmentRoll
ProposedAssessmentRoll
AssessmentAreaMap
ExcerptfromStateofMinnesotaTaxForfeitGuide
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-0041
ORDERINGIMPROVEMENTSFORHILLSIDEFARMTHIRDANDFOURTH
ADDITIONPUBLICIMPROVEMENTS
CITYPROJECTNO.12C008
WHEREAS,pursuanttoaresolutionoftheCounciladoptedonFebruary10,2014,aFeasibility
ReporthasbeenpreparedbytheCity’sConsultingEngineerswithreferencetoproposedpublic
improvementsforHillsideFarm3rd and4th Additions,includingthefinalliftofpavementonthe
development’sinternalstreets,sidewalkconstructionalongDeerStreetandBisonAvenue,
utilityadjustments,clustermailboxplacement,trailconstructionalongFenningAvenueadjacent
tothedevelopment,internaltrailextensionnorthofDeerStreetontheeastsideofthe
development,installationofconservationeasementposts,siltfenceremoval,cleanup,andother
associatedappurtenantwork;and
WHEREAS,pursuanttoaresolutionoftheCityCounciladoptedonMarch10,2014,the
FeasibilityReportwasreceivedforreviewandapproved,andtheCityCouncilauthorized
preparationofplansandspecificationforsaidpublicimprovements;and
WHEREAS,pursuanttoaresolutionoftheCityCounciladoptedonMarch24,2014,theplans
andspecificationswereapproved,advertisementforbidswasauthorized,andaPublicHearing
wascalledforApril28,2014at7p.m.,wheretheCouncilwillconsidertheproposed
improvementsforsaidpublicimprovementsinaccordancewiththeFeasibilityReportsandthe
assessmentofbenefittingpropertiesforthecostoftheimprovementspursuanttoMinnesota
Statutes,Chapter429;and
WHEREAS,onApril10andApril17,2014,theClerkgavepublishednoticeofsuchhearing
andimprovementsasrequiredbylawandonApril14,2014,theClerkgavemailednoticeto
affectedpropertyownersasrequiredbylaw.
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1.Suchimprovementisnecessary,cost-effectiveandfeasibleasdetailedinthefeasibility
report.Thetotalcostoftheimprovementsfortheproposedpublicimprovementsfor
HillsideFarm3rd and4th Additionsisestimatedat$226,780.
2.WSB&Associates,Inc.isherebydesignatedastheengineerforthisimprovement.The
engineerhaspreparedplansandspecificationsforthemakingofsuchimprovements.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis28th dayofApril,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
_____________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-042
ADOPTINGASSESSMENTROLLANDCERTIFYINGASSESSMENTSTOTHE
TAXFORFEITPARCELSBENEFITTINGFROMHILLSIDEFARMTHIRDAND
FOURTHADDITIONPUBLICIMPROVEMENTS
CITYPROJECTNO.12C008
WHEREAS,pursuanttopropernoticedulygivenasrequiredbylaw,theCouncilhasmetand
heardandpasseduponallobjectionstotheproposedassessmentsfortheproposedpublic
improvementsforHillsideFarm3rd and4th Additions,includingthefinalliftofpavementonthe
development’sinternalstreets,sidewalkconstructionalongDeerStreetandBisonAvenue,
utilityadjustments,clustermailboxplacement,trailconstructionalongFenningAvenueadjacent
tothedevelopment,internaltrailextensionnorthofDeerStreetontheeastsideofthe
development,installationofconservationeasementposts,siltfenceremoval,cleanup,andother
associatedappurtenantwork;and
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1.Suchproposedassessment,copiesofwhichareattachedheretoandmadeaparthereof,is
herebyacceptedandshallconstitutethespecialassessmentagainstthelandsnamedtherein,
andeachtractoflandthereinincludedisherebyfoundtobebenefittedbytheproposed
improvementintheamountoftheassessmentleviedagainstit.
2.Eachassessment,intheamountadoptedintheassessmentroll,shallbecertifiedtothe47tax
forfeitparcelsinHillsideFarm3rd and4th Additions.TheWrightCountyAuditorhasbeen
authorizedtoaddtheseassessmentamountstothestartingvalueofthetaxforfeitparcelsand
placetheseparcelsonauctionforsaletothepublic.Suchassessmentsshallbecollectedand
paidovertotheCityfollowingsaleoftheparcelsatauction.
3.TheCitystatestheirintentiontoreassessunpaidassessmentsthathavebeencancelledonthe
47taxforfeitparcels,providedthatsufficientrevenueisnotgeneratedfromsaleofthese
parcelsatpublicauction.Unpaidassessmentsprincipalbalancesintheamountof$8,960.99
forHillsideFarm3rd Additionand$12,072.26forHillsideFarm4th Additioncouldbe
assessedovera10yearperiodat5.5%(percent)interest,pendingapprovaloftheMonticello
CityCouncilandsubjecttoMinnesotaStatutes429.071,435.23,and444.076.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis28thdayofApril,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
______________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
Project: Hillside Farm 3rd and 4th Additions Improvements Proposed Project Cost:
Project Location:City of Monticello, MN Proposed Vacant Unit Assessment: $4,425.53
City Project No:12C008
WSB Project No:01494-870
1 155201001070 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 8739 BISON AVE 1 $4,425.53
2 155201001060 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 8725 BISON AVE 1 $4,425.53
3 155201001050 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 8707 BISON AVE 1 $4,425.53
4 155201001040 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 8689 BISON AVE 1 $4,425.53
5 155201001030 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 8683 BISON AVE 1 $4,425.53
6 155201001020 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 8657 BISON AVE 1 $4,425.53
7 155201001010 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 8637 BISON AVE 1 $4,425.53
8 155201002100 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 1 $4,425.53
9 155201002090 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5835 BISON CIR 1 $4,425.53
10 155201002080 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5841 BISON CIR 1 $4,425.53
11 155201002070 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5836 BISON CIR 1 $4,425.53
12 155201002060 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5824 BISON CIR 1 $4,425.53
13 155201002050 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 1 $4,425.53
14 155201002040 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 8674 BISON AVE 1 $4,425.53
15 155201002030 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 8658 BISON AVE 1 $4,425.53
16 155201002020 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 8644 BISON AVE 1 $4,425.53
17 155201002010 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5787 BADGER AVE 1 $4,425.53
18 155199001010 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5991 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
19 155199001020 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5975 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
20 155199001030 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5954 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
21 155199001040 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5943 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
22 155199001050 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5929 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
23 155199001060 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5917 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
24 155199001070 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5905 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
25 155199001080 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5893 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
26 155199001090 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5885 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
27 155199001100 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5881 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
28 155199001110 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5875 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
29 155199001120 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5869 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
30 155199001130 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5863 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
31 155199001140 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5857 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
32 155199001150 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5851 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
33 155199001160 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 1 $4,425.53
34 155199002010 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 1 $4,425.53
35 155199002020 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5934 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
Final Assessment Roll
$208,000.00
MAP
ID PID FEE OWNER FEE OWNER ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP PROPERTY
ADDRESS UNITS PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT
MAP
ID PID FEE OWNER FEE OWNER ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP PROPERTY
ADDRESS UNITS PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT
36 155199002030 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5912 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
37 155199002040 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5886 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
38 155199002050 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5882 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
39 155199002060 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5876 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
40 155199002070 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 1 $4,425.53
41 155199002080 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5909 DEER CIR 1 $4,425.53
42 155199002100 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5908 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
43 155199002110 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5898 DEER CIR 1 $4,425.53
44 155199002120 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 1 $4,425.53
45 155199002130 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5854 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
46 155199002140 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 5846 DEER ST 1 $4,425.53
47 155199002150 STATE OF MN TAX FORFEITURE (WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR)10 2ND ST NW ROOM 230 BUFFALO, MN 55313 1 $4,425.53
98
10
1
42
7
17
2
3
4
14
11
23
5
6
24
41
15
33 43
38
13
18
16
22
47
25
12
44
37
40
32
46
36
21
31
34
26
29
27
30
28
20 19
35
45
39
DEER ST
ELK AVE
FENNING AVE NE
BADGER ST
BISON AVE
BAKKEN ST
86TH ST NE DEER CIR
BISON CIR
Document Path: K:\01494-870\GIS\Maps\Assessment.mxd Date Saved: 2/21/2014 4:25:03 PM
Hillside Farm 3rd and 4th Additions ImprovementsAssessed ParcelsCity of Monticello, MN 1 in = 200 ftFebruary 2014 ±
Legend
Street & Utility Improvement Project Area
Assessed Parcels
CityCouncilAgenda:4/28/14
1
7B.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-043acceptingbidsandawardingthe
contractforHillsideFarm3rd and4th AdditionPublicImprovements,CityProject
No.12C008 (SB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
OnMarch24,2014,theCouncilauthorizedadvertisementforbidsfortheHillsideFarm
3rd and4th AdditionsPublicImprovements.Thepublicimprovementswereoriginally
intendedtobecompletedbytheprojectdeveloper,TrisonDevelopment.However,the
developer hasdefaultedonthepropertiesandthe47vacantlotsarecurrentlyintax
forfeitureandintheStateofMinnesota’sname.
Theremainingpublicimprovementsincludeplacingthefinalliftofpavementonthe
development’sinternalstreets,sidewalkconstructionalongDeerStreetandBison
Avenue,utilityadjustments,clustermailboxplacement,trailconstructionalongFenning
Avenueadjacenttothedevelopment,internaltrailextensionnorthofDeerStreetonthe
eastsideofthedevelopment,installationofconservationeasementposts,siltfence
removal,cleanup,andotherassociatedappurtenantwork.
BidsfortheprojectwerereceivedandopenedonMonday,April7,2014.TheCity
receivedeightbids,whichwereverycompetitive,withASTECHCorporationofSt.
Cloud,MNsubmittingthelowbidforthisprojectintheamountof$154,568.25.The
followingisasummaryofthebidresults:
ContractorTotalBaseBid
ASTECHCorp.$154,568.25
OmannBrothersPaving,Inc.$161,381.50
ConcreteIdea,Inc.$163,113.50
KnifeRiverCorporation$193,956.50
Mid-MNHotMix,Inc.$195,749.00
SunramConstruction,Inc.$218,330.00
Hardrives,Inc.$252,512.30
BarberConstruction,Inc.$335,241.00
Engineer'sOpinionofProbableCost$187,052.74
Thetotalestimatedprojectcostasestimatedinthefeasibilityreportwas$226,780.The
totalestimatedprojectcostbasedonthebidsreceivedis$208,000.Thesecostsinclude
anapproximate10%contingencyand22%indirectcosts.
CityCouncilAgenda:4/28/14
2
ReferencesforASTECHhavebeencheckedandwearerecommendingawardinga
contracttothem.
ConstructionisplannedtobecompleteinAugust,2014.
A1.BudgetImpact:Theestimatedprojectscostis$208,000basedonthebids
received,whichincludesconstructioncosts,10%contingencyand22%indirect
costs.Thisisanunbudgetedimprovementproject.Thisestimateresultsin
approximately$4,425innewspecialassessmentstoeachundevelopedlot.
StaffrecommendsusingtheCapitalProjectFundtofundtheprojectupfront,
withthatsourcebeingpaidbackvialotsalerevenue.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Constructioninspectionoftheprojectwillbe
completedbyCitystaffwithWSBcompletingtheadministrationservices.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2014-043acceptingthebidsandawardingthe
contracttothelowestresponsiblebidder,ASTECH,Corp.intheamountof
$154,568.25forHillsideFarms3rd &4th AdditionsPublicImprovements,City
ProjectNo.12C008.
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2014-043atthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Resolution#2014-043
WSBLetterofRecommendation
BidSummary
BidTabulation
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTYMINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-043
ACCEPTINGBIDSANDAWARDINGCONTRACTFORHILLSIDEFARMTHIRD
ANDFOURTHADDITIONPUBLICIMPROVEMENTS
CITYPROJECTNO.12C008
WHEREAS,pursuanttoanadvertisementforbidsonMarch27,2014,forthemakingofpublic
improvementsforHillsideFarm3rd and4th Additions,includingthefinalliftofpavementonthe
development’sinternalstreets,sidewalkconstructionalongDeerStreetandBisonAvenue,
utilityadjustments,clustermailboxplacement,trailconstructionalongFenningAvenueadjacent
tothedevelopment,internaltrailextensionnorthofDeerStreetontheeastsideofthe
development,installationofconservationeasementposts,siltfenceremoval,cleanup,andother
associatedappurtenantwork,bidswerereceived,opened,andtabulated,andthefollowingbids
werefoundtocomplywiththeadvertisementforbids:
CONTRACTORTOTALBASEBID
ASTECHCorporation$154,568.25
OmannBrothersPaving,Inc.161,381.50
ConcreteIdea,Inc.163,113.50
KnifeRiverCorporation193,956.50
Mid-MNHotMix,Inc.195,749.00
SunramConstruction,Inc.218,330.00
Hardrives,Inc.252,512.30
BarberConstruction,Inc.335,241.00
Engineer’sOpinionofProbableCost$187,052.74
WHEREAS,thebidofASTECHCorporationofSt.Cloud,MNintheamountof$154,568.25
forthetotalbasebidfortheconstructionofsaidimprovements,inaccordancewiththeplansand
specificationsandadvertisementforbids,isthelowestresponsiblebidderandshallbeand
herebyisaccepted;
NOWTHEREFOREBEITHEREBYRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITY
OFMONTICELLO:
1.TheMayorandCityAdministratorareherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoenterintoa
contractwithsaidbidderfortheconstructionofsaidimprovementsforandonbehalfof
theCityofMonticello.
2.TheCityAdministratorisherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoreturnforthwithtoall
biddersthedepositsmadewiththeirbids,exceptthatthedepositofthesuccessfulbidder
andthenextlowestbiddershallberetaineduntilacontracthasbeenexecuted.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis28th dayofApril,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
engineering planning environmental construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
St. Cloud Minneapolis St. Paul
Equal Opportunity Employer
wsbeng.com
K:\01494-870\Admin\Construction Admin\LTR RECMMDTN-hmcc-040814.docx
April 23, 2014
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Hillside Farm 3rd and 4th Additions Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 12C008
WSB Project No. 1494-870
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Bids were received for the above-referenced project on Monday, April 7, 2014, and were opened
and read aloud. Eight bids were received. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy
and tabulated. Please find enclosed the bid tabulation indicating the low bidder as ASTECH
Corp., St. Cloud, Minnesota, with a total base bid in the amount of $154,568.25. The Engineer’s
Estimate for the project was $187,052.74.
We recommend that the City Council consider these bids and award a contract to ASTECH
Corp. based on the results of the bids received.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Shibani K. Bisson, PE
City Engineer
Enclosures
cc: Jeff O’Neill, City of Monticello
Bruce Batzer, ASTECH Corp.
srb
PROJECT:
Hillside Farm 3rd and 4th Additions Improvements
City Project No. 12C008
OWNER:
City of Monticello, MN
WSB PROJECT NO.:
1494-870
BIDS OPENED: Monday, April 7, 2014, at 10:30 a.m.
Contractor
Bid Bond
(5%)
Addendum
Received Total Base Bid
1ASTECH Corp.XN/A$154,568.25
2Omann Brothers Paving, Inc.XN/A$161,381.50
3Concrete Idea, Inc.XN/A$163,113.50
4Knife River CorporationXN/A$193,956.50
5Mid-MN Hot Mix, Inc.XN/A$195,749.00
6Sunram Construction, Inc.XN/A$218,330.00
7Hardrives, Inc.XN/A$252,512.30
8Barber Construction, Inc.XN/A$335,241.00
Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost$187,052.74
Denotes corrected figure
Shibani K. Bisson, PE, Project Manager
BID TABULATION SUMMARY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on April 7, 2014.
K:\01494-870\Admin\Construction Admin\1494-87 Bid Tab Summary-040714-signed
4/8/2014
WS
B
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
i
d
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
:
MO
N
T
- H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
F
a
r
m
s
3
r
d
a
n
d
4t
h
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
N
o
.
:
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
C
i
t
y o
f
M
o
n
t
i
c
e
l
l
o
Pr
o
jec
t
N
o
.
:
0
1
4
9
4-87
Bi
d
O
p
e
n
i
n
g
:
4
/
7/
2
0
1
4
1
0
:
0
0
A
M
Ow
n
e
r
:
M
i
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
8
7
-
M
O
N
T
-
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
F
a
rm
s
3
r
d
a
n
d
4
t
h
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
As
t
e
c
h
C
o
r
p
.
Om
a
n
n
B
r
o
t
h
e
r
s
,
I
n
c
.
Concrete Idea, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total PriceUnit PriceTotal Price
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
1
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$5
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$5,200.00$3,500.00$3,500.00
2
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
C
U
R
B
A
N
D
G
U
T
T
E
R
LI
N
F
T
16
0
$4
.
0
0
$6
4
0
.
0
0
$4
.
2
5
$6
8
0
.
0
0
$6
.
0
0
$960.00$5.00$800.00
3
21
0
4
.
5
0
3
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
65
$3
.
0
0
$1
9
5
.
0
0
$4
.
2
5
$2
7
6
.
2
5
$3
.
0
0
$195.00$1.00$65.00
4
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
35
$2
0
.
0
0
$7
0
0
.
0
0
$2
5
.
0
0
$8
7
5
.
0
0
$2
6
.
0
0
$910.00$15.00$525.00
5
22
3
2
.
5
0
1
MI
L
L
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
(
1
.
5
"
)
SQ
Y
D
90
$3
0
.
0
0
$2
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$4
.
0
0
$3
6
0
.
0
0
$5
.
0
0
$450.00$5.40$486.00
6
23
3
1
.
6
0
4
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
T
R
A
I
L
SQ
Y
D
90
0
$1
8
.
9
0
$1
7
,
0
1
0
.
0
0
$1
6
.
0
0
$1
4
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$1
6
.
1
0
$14,490.00$19.00$17,100.00
7
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
81
5
$3
.
5
0
$2
,
8
5
2
.
5
0
$3
.
0
0
$2
,
4
4
5
.
0
0
$3
.
5
0
$2,852.50$4.50$3,667.50
8
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
76
0
$7
0
.
0
0
$5
3
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$7
2
.
0
0
$5
4
,
7
2
0
.
0
0
$6
4
.
4
0
$48,944.00$80.00$60,800.00
9
25
0
3
.
6
0
1
CL
E
A
N
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1,000.00$4,000.00$4,000.00
10
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
AD
J
U
S
T
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
5
$2
2
5
.
0
0
$1
,
1
2
5
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$6
0
.
0
0
$300.00$250.00$1,250.00
11
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
RE
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
V
A
L
V
E
B
O
X
EA
C
H
1
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$500.00$450.00$450.00
12
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
)
EA
C
H
13
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$5
,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$1
8
0
.
0
0
$2,340.00$250.00$3,250.00
13
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
EA
C
H
7
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$1
8
0
.
0
0
$1,260.00$250.00$1,750.00
14
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
CH
I
M
N
E
Y
S
E
A
L
(
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
L
)
EA
C
H
14
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$4,200.00$400.00$5,600.00
15
25
2
1
.
5
0
1
6"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
11
9
0
0
$7
.
0
0
$8
3
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$4
.
0
0
$4
7
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$4
.
8
0
$57,120.00$3.75$44,625.00
16
25
3
1
.
5
0
1
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
C
U
R
B
&
G
U
T
T
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
D
4
1
2
(
M
O
D
I
F
I
E
D
)
LI
N
F
T
16
0
$1
5
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$2
1
.
5
0
$3
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$1
8
.
0
0
$2,880.00$20.00$3,200.00
17
25
3
1
.
6
1
8
TR
U
N
C
A
T
E
D
D
O
M
E
S
SQ
F
T
46
$6
5
.
4
4
$3
,
0
1
0
.
2
4
$3
7
.
0
0
$1
,
7
0
2
.
0
0
$3
6
.
0
0
$1,656.00$30.00$1,380.00
18
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
IN
S
T
A
L
L
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
S
U
P
P
O
R
T
(
C
L
U
S
T
E
R
)
EA
C
H
13
$9
0
.
0
0
$1
,
1
7
0
.
0
0
$1
5
0
.
0
0
$1
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$7,800.00$545.00$7,085.00
19
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
MA
I
L
B
O
X
EA
C
H
48
$5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$7
5
.
0
0
$3
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$4
0
.
0
0
$1,920.00$35.00$1,680.00
20
25
6
4
.
5
3
7
IN
S
T
A
L
L
S
I
G
N
T
Y
P
E
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
EA
C
H
8
$7
5
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$2
1
5
.
0
0
$1
,
7
2
0
.
0
0
$1
8
8
.
0
0
$1,504.00$225.00$1,800.00
21
25
7
5
.
6
0
1
ER
O
S
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$4,900.00$100.00$100.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
8
7
,
0
5
2
.
7
4
$1
5
4
,
5
6
8
.
2
5
$161,381.50 $163,113.50
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
8
7
,
0
5
2
.
7
4
$1
5
4
,
5
6
8
.
2
5
$161,381.50 $163,113.50 Page 1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
8
7
-
M
O
N
T
-
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
F
a
rm
s
3
r
d
a
n
d
4
t
h
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
As
t
e
c
h
C
o
r
p
.
Om
a
n
n
B
r
o
t
h
e
r
s
,
I
n
c
.
Concrete Idea, Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total PriceUnit PriceTotal Price
To
t
a
l
s
f
o
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
0
1
4
9
4
-
8
7
$1
8
7
,
0
5
2
.
7
4
$1
5
4
,
5
6
8
.
2
5
$161,381.50 $163,113.50
%
o
f
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
f
o
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
0
1
4
9
4
-
8
7
-1
7
.
3
7
%
-13.72% -12.80%Page 2
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
8
7
-
M
O
N
T
-
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
F
a
rm
s
3
r
d
a
n
d
4
t
h
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Kn
i
f
e
R
i
v
e
r
Mi
d
-
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
H
o
t
M
i
x
,
In
c
.
Sunram Construction
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Total PriceUnit PriceTotal Price
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
1
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$8
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$8,500.00$10,700.70$10,700.70
2
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
C
U
R
B
A
N
D
G
U
T
T
E
R
LI
N
F
T
16
0
$4
.
0
0
$6
4
0
.
0
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$1
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$1,600.00$13.60$2,176.00
3
21
0
4
.
5
0
3
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
65
$3
.
0
0
$1
9
5
.
0
0
$5
.
0
0
$3
2
5
.
0
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$650.00$5.00$325.00
4
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
35
$2
0
.
0
0
$7
0
0
.
0
0
$3
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
5
0
.
0
0
$4
0
.
0
0
$1,400.00$76.00$2,660.00
5
22
3
2
.
5
0
1
MI
L
L
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
(
1
.
5
"
)
SQ
Y
D
90
$3
0
.
0
0
$2
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$8
.
0
0
$7
2
0
.
0
0
$1
0
.
0
0
$900.00$20.25$1,822.50
6
23
3
1
.
6
0
4
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
T
R
A
I
L
SQ
Y
D
90
0
$1
8
.
9
0
$1
7
,
0
1
0
.
0
0
$1
9
.
0
0
$1
7
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$2
1
.
0
0
$18,900.00$21.35$19,215.00
7
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
81
5
$3
.
5
0
$2
,
8
5
2
.
5
0
$2
.
5
0
$2
,
0
3
7
.
5
0
$3
.
0
0
$2,445.00$4.20$3,423.00
8
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
76
0
$7
0
.
0
0
$5
3
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$6
7
.
0
0
$5
0
,
9
2
0
.
0
0
$7
5
.
7
5
$57,570.00$68.25$51,870.00
9
25
0
3
.
6
0
1
CL
E
A
N
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$4,000.00$4,500.00$4,500.00
10
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
AD
J
U
S
T
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
5
$2
2
5
.
0
0
$1
,
1
2
5
.
0
0
$4
5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$2,000.00$725.00$3,625.00
11
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
RE
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
V
A
L
V
E
B
O
X
EA
C
H
1
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$6
5
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$600.00$1,075.00$1,075.00
12
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
)
EA
C
H
13
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$5
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$7,800.00$795.00$10,335.00
13
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
EA
C
H
7
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$4,200.00$865.00$6,055.00
14
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
CH
I
M
N
E
Y
S
E
A
L
(
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
L
)
EA
C
H
14
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$2
2
5
.
0
0
$3
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$5,600.00$965.00$13,510.00
15
25
2
1
.
5
0
1
6"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
11
9
0
0
$7
.
0
0
$8
3
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$4
.
9
5
$5
8
,
9
0
5
.
0
0
$3
.
5
0
$41,650.00$5.40$64,260.00
16
25
3
1
.
5
0
1
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
C
U
R
B
&
G
U
T
T
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
D
4
1
2
(
M
O
D
I
F
I
E
D
)
LI
N
F
T
16
0
$1
5
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$1
4
.
5
0
$2
,
3
2
0
.
0
0
$1
6
.
5
0
$2,640.00$18.25$2,920.00
17
25
3
1
.
6
1
8
TR
U
N
C
A
T
E
D
D
O
M
E
S
SQ
F
T
46
$6
5
.
4
4
$3
,
0
1
0
.
2
4
$3
4
.
0
0
$1
,
5
6
4
.
0
0
$3
6
.
5
0
$1,679.00$37.80$1,738.80
18
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
IN
S
T
A
L
L
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
S
U
P
P
O
R
T
(
C
L
U
S
T
E
R
)
EA
C
H
13
$9
0
.
0
0
$1
,
1
7
0
.
0
0
$5
4
5
.
0
0
$7
,
0
8
5
.
0
0
$6
3
5
.
0
0
$8,255.00$575.00$7,475.00
19
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
MA
I
L
B
O
X
EA
C
H
48
$5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$3
5
.
0
0
$1
,
6
8
0
.
0
0
$4
5
.
0
0
$2,160.00$36.75$1,764.00
20
25
6
4
.
5
3
7
IN
S
T
A
L
L
S
I
G
N
T
Y
P
E
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
EA
C
H
8
$7
5
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$3,200.00$210.00$1,680.00
21
25
7
5
.
6
0
1
ER
O
S
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$20,000.00$7,200.00$7,200.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
8
7
,
0
5
2
.
7
4
$1
9
3
,
9
5
6
.
5
0
$195,749.00 $218,330.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
8
7
,
0
5
2
.
7
4
$1
9
3
,
9
5
6
.
5
0
$195,749.00 $218,330.00
To
t
a
l
s
f
o
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
0
1
4
9
4
-
8
7
$1
8
7
,
0
5
2
.
7
4
$1
9
3
,
9
5
6
.
5
0
$195,749.00 $218,330.00
%
o
f
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
f
o
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
0
1
4
9
4
-
8
7
3.
6
9
%
4.65% 16.72%Page 3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
0
1
4
9
4
-
8
7
-
M
O
N
T
-
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
F
a
rm
s
3
r
d
a
n
d
4
t
h
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Ha
r
d
r
i
v
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
(
R
o
g
e
r
s
)
Barber Construction Co., Inc.
It
e
m
N
o
.
It
e
m
Un
i
t
s
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
i
c
e
Unit PriceTotal Price
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
1
20
2
1
.
5
0
1
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$12,000.00$12,000.00
2
21
0
4
.
5
0
1
RE
M
O
V
E
C
U
R
B
A
N
D
G
U
T
T
E
R
LI
N
F
T
16
0
$4
.
0
0
$6
4
0
.
0
0
$1
2
.
0
0
$1
,
9
2
0
.
0
0
$15.00$2,400.00
3
21
0
4
.
5
0
3
RE
M
O
V
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
65
$3
.
0
0
$1
9
5
.
0
0
$6
.
0
0
$390.00$3.00$195.00
4
22
1
1
.
5
0
1
AG
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
B
A
S
E
C
L
A
S
S
5
M
O
D
TO
N
35
$2
0
.
0
0
$7
0
0
.
0
0
$3
2
.
0
0
$1
,
1
2
0
.
0
0
$100.00$3,500.00
5
22
3
2
.
5
0
1
MI
L
L
B
I
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
(
1
.
5
"
)
SQ
Y
D
90
$3
0
.
0
0
$2
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$1
9
.
2
5
$1
,
7
3
2
.
5
0
$50.00$4,500.00
6
23
3
1
.
6
0
4
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
T
R
A
I
L
SQ
Y
D
90
0
$1
8
.
9
0
$1
7
,
0
1
0
.
0
0
$2
0
.
3
7
$1
8
,
3
3
3
.
0
0
$33.00$29,700.00
7
23
5
7
.
5
0
2
BI
T
U
M
I
N
O
U
S
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
F
O
R
T
A
C
K
C
O
A
T
GA
L
L
O
N
81
5
$3
.
5
0
$2
,
8
5
2
.
5
0
$4
.
0
2
$3
,
2
7
6
.
3
0
$5.00$4,075.00
8
23
6
0
.
5
0
1
TY
P
E
S
P
9
.
5
W
E
A
R
I
N
G
C
O
U
R
S
E
M
I
X
T
U
R
E
(
2
,
B
)
TO
N
76
0
$7
0
.
0
0
$5
3
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$6
4
.
0
0
$4
8
,
6
4
0
.
0
0
$100.00$76,000.00
9
25
0
3
.
6
0
1
CL
E
A
N
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
9
0
6
.
0
0
$4
,
9
0
6
.
0
0
$5,800.00$5,800.00
10
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
AD
J
U
S
T
G
A
T
E
V
A
L
V
E
A
N
D
B
O
X
EA
C
H
5
$2
2
5
.
0
0
$1
,
1
2
5
.
0
0
$1
0
0
.
0
0
$500.00$650.00$3,250.00
11
25
0
4
.
6
0
2
RE
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
V
A
L
V
E
B
O
X
EA
C
H
1
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$7
5
1
.
0
0
$751.00$4,250.00$4,250.00
12
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
)
EA
C
H
13
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$4
0
0
.
0
0
$5
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$2,000.00$26,000.00
13
25
0
6
.
5
2
2
AD
J
U
S
T
F
R
A
M
E
&
R
I
N
G
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
(
S
T
O
R
M
)
EA
C
H
7
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$3
5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
4
5
0
.
0
0
$2,000.00$14,000.00
14
25
0
6
.
6
0
2
CH
I
M
N
E
Y
S
E
A
L
(
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
L
)
EA
C
H
14
$2
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$3
6
5
.
0
0
$5
,
1
1
0
.
0
0
$1,900.00$26,600.00
15
25
2
1
.
5
0
1
6"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
SQ
F
T
11
9
0
0
$7
.
0
0
$8
3
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$7
.
6
0
$9
0
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$8.00$95,200.00
16
25
3
1
.
5
0
1
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
C
U
R
B
&
G
U
T
T
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
D
4
1
2
(
M
O
D
I
F
I
E
D
)
LI
N
F
T
16
0
$1
5
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$4
0
.
7
1
$6
,
5
1
3
.
6
0
$34.00$5,440.00
17
25
3
1
.
6
1
8
TR
U
N
C
A
T
E
D
D
O
M
E
S
SQ
F
T
46
$6
5
.
4
4
$3
,
0
1
0
.
2
4
$4
1
.
0
0
$1
,
8
8
6
.
0
0
$54.00$2,484.00
18
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
IN
S
T
A
L
L
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
S
U
P
P
O
R
T
(
C
L
U
S
T
E
R
)
EA
C
H
13
$9
0
.
0
0
$1
,
1
7
0
.
0
0
$6
1
2
.
0
0
$7
,
9
5
6
.
0
0
$659.00$8,567.00
19
25
4
0
.
6
0
2
MA
I
L
B
O
X
EA
C
H
48
$5
0
.
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$3
9
.
2
5
$1
,
8
8
4
.
0
0
$60.00$2,880.00
20
25
6
4
.
5
3
7
IN
S
T
A
L
L
S
I
G
N
T
Y
P
E
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
EA
C
H
8
$7
5
.
0
0
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$4
4
8
.
9
6
$3
,
5
9
1
.
6
8
$750.00$6,000.00
21
25
7
5
.
6
0
1
ER
O
S
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
LU
M
P
S
U
M
1
$4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
8
,
9
1
2
.
2
2
$3
8
,
9
1
2
.
2
2
$2,400.00$2,400.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
8
7
,
0
5
2
.
7
4
$2
5
2
,
5
1
2
.
3
0
$335,241.00
To
t
a
l
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
-
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
$1
8
7
,
0
5
2
.
7
4
$2
5
2
,
5
1
2
.
3
0
$335,241.00
To
t
a
l
s
f
o
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
0
1
4
9
4
-
8
7
$1
8
7
,
0
5
2
.
7
4
$2
5
2
,
5
1
2
.
3
0
$335,241.00
%
o
f
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
f
o
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
0
1
4
9
4
-
8
7
35.00% 79.22%
I
h
e
r
e
b
y
c
e
r
t
i
f
y
t
h
a
t
t
h
i
s
i
s
a
n
e
xa
c
t
r
e
p
rod
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
b
i
d
s
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
.
Ce
r
t
i
f
i
e
d
B
y
:
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
N
o
.
4
1
8
6
0
Da
t
e
:
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
1
4
Page 4
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
1
7C.ConsiderationofapprovingFinalStatePlannedUnitDevelopmentforaK-12
EducationalInstitutioninanR-3(MediumDensityResidence)DistrictandCCD
(CentralCommunityDistrict),adoptingOrdinance#592forrezoningtoPlanned
UnitDevelopment,andadoptingResolution#2014-044approvingPUDand
DevelopmentAgreement.Applicant:Miller,Eric/SRCSBuildingCompany,o/b/o
SwanRiverMontessori (NAC)
A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND:
Property:Lot6&7,Block10,TownsiteofMonticello(503Maple
Street)
Lots8,9&10EXSWLY45FTTHOF,Block11(500
MapleStreet)
TwoadjacentandinterrelatedPUDpropertiesare
proposed,at503MapleStreet(PID155-010-010060)and
500MapleStreet(PID155-010-011080),between4th St.
W.and5th St.W.inthedowntownMonticelloarea.
PlanningCaseNumber:2014-012
Request(s):FinalStagePlannedUnitDevelopmentApprovaland
RezoningtoPUDDistrict.
DeadlineforDecision:June6th,2014
LandUseDesignation:DowntownLandUses&PlacestoLive
ZoningDesignation:R-3,MediumDensityResidential(503MapleSt.)
Thepurposeofthe“R-3”mediumdensityresidential
districtistoprovideformediumdensityhousingin
multiplefamilystructuresranginguptoandincluding
twelve(12)unitsanddirectlyrelated,complementaryuses.
CCD,CentralCommunityDistrict(500MapleSt.)
Thepurposeofthe“CCD”,CentralCommunityDistrict,is
toprovideforawidevarietyoflanduses,transportation
options,andpublicactivitiesinthedowntownMonticello
area,andparticularlytoimplementthegoals,objectives,
andspecificdirectivesoftheComprehensivePlan,andin
particular,theEmbracingDowntownMonticelloreportand
itsDesignGuidelines.
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
2
ProposedZoning:ThepurposeofthePUDzoningdistrictistoprovide
greaterflexibilityinthedevelopmentofneighborhoodsand
non-residentialareasinordertomaximizepublicvalues
andachievemorecreativedevelopmentoutcomeswhile
remainingeconomicallyviableandmarketable.
CurrentSiteUse:The500MapleSt.parceliscurrentlyoccupiedbytheSwan
RiverMontessoriSchool,whichsharesparkingwiththe
CityofMonticellototheeast.The503MapleSt.parcel
currentlycontainsasinglefamilyhome,andisthesitefora
newschoolbuildingassociatedwiththeexistingschool
buildingat500MapleSt.
SurroundingLandUses:
North:RailroadROW
East:(IncludedinPUD)CCD,MonticelloCommunityCenter
South:R-3,MediumDensityResidentialDistrict
West:R-3,MediumDensityResidentialDistrict
ProjectDescription:TheapplicantisproposingtorezonetheCCDandR-3
Districtparcelslocatedat500MapleSt.and503MapleSt.
toPlannedUnitDevelopmentDistrict.Inadditionthe
applicantisrequestingCityapprovalofFinalStagePUD
plansforanewschoolbuildinglocatedat503MapleSt.,
whichwillbeassociatedwithanexistingMontessori
schoolbuildinglocatedat500MapleSt.,resultingina
campustypearrangementfortheeducationalinstitution.
ThePUDdesignationisdesiredtofacilitateinteractions
andimprovementsbetweenthetwoschoolsitesby
providingflexibilitywithregardstoaccess,parkingsupply,
buildingarchitecture,setbacks,andlandscaping.
OrdinanceRequirements:ThefirststepinthePUDapprovalprocessistoconducta
collaborativePlanningCommission/CityCouncilworkshop
meetingwiththedeveloperatwhichaPublicValues
Statementisdeveloped.Thismeetingwasheldon
December18,2014,fromwhichaPublicValuesStatement
waswrittenandforwardedtotheapplicantandpublic
officials.ThePublicValuesStatementformsthe
parametersforconsiderationofdevelopmentproposalson
thepropertyandfortheelementsconstitutingthenewPUD
Districtthatwillapplytothesubjectarea.
WiththeadoptionofthePublicValuesStatement,the
applicantthenreceivedconditionalapprovalofpreliminary
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
3
PUDplansfortheproject,proceedingfromConceptStage
toDevelopmentStageapprovals,combiningthetwoplan
reviews.
FinalStagePUDinvolvesreviewoftheDevelopment
Stageapprovalconditionstoensurethattheconditions
havebeenmetinthefinalplanset.WithFinalStagePUD
approval,theCityCouncilcanthenrezonethesitetothe
PUDDistrict,utilizingthedevelopmentplansand
conditionsastheordinancefortheproperty.
ANALYSIS
PUDREZONING
Asnoted,theCityCounciltakesactionontherezoningofthesitetoPUDwhenthefinal
stagePUDapplicationissubmitted.Atthattime,boththeOrdinanceforPUDrezoning
andthefinalstagePUDrequestsareconsideredforCouncildecision.ThePlanning
Commissionheldahearingontheconcept,developmentandrezoningrequestsonMarch
4th,2014.Planningstaff’sanalysisofthedevelopmentstagePUDplansisprovidedfor
reference.
FinalStagePUDproceedsdirectlytotheCityCouncilforconsiderationoftheordinance.
TheparcelswillbesubjecttotherequirementsofPUDapproval,includingthefollowing
applicableexpectationsforadevelopmentseekingarezoningtoPUD:
(a)Ensurehighqualityconstructionstandardsandtheuseofhighqualityconstruction
materials;
Comment:Thedesignofthenewschoolbuildingshouldreflectthematerialsanddesign
oftheexistingMontessorischoolbuilding,withexteriorconstructionmaterialsvery
similartothatoftheexistingbuilding.Thenewschoolbuildingwillintegratefiber
reinforcedcementlapsiding,amanufacturedstonebasewithwatertable,andasteel
roofingpanelthatwillresembletraditionalshinglesbuthaveanextendedlife.
(d)Promoteaesthetically-pleasingdesignwithintheneighborhoodandappearsattractive
andinvitingfromsurroundingparcels;
Comment:Thenewschoolbuildingissimilarindesignandfinishtotheexistingschool
building,sowillmaintainanaestheticappearancealreadyfamiliartotheneighborhood.
Inaddition,theapplicantswishtoinstallvegetativescreeningintheformofshrubs
aroundtheperimeterofthePUDsite,tohelpfilterviewsbetweenresidentialusesand
theschool,andwillimplementattractive,nativegroundcoverplantingsconsistingofa
combinationofgrassesandflowerstofurtherbeautifythesite.
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
4
Thoughlooselybasedonthearchitectureoftheexistingschoolbuilding,theproposed
schoolbuildingissimplerindesign.Theroofhasalowpitch(4/12),whichin
combinationwithflatwindowsandminimalroofvariationresultsinamutedbuilding
appearance.Theroofontheexistingschoolbuildinghasmoredramaticroof
architectureandglasspresentationtothestreetwhichaddscharactertothebuilding.
Theadditionofdormersordecorativefeatures(e.g.skylight,etc.)totheroofofthenew
schoolbuildingwouldaddinteresttotheupperportionofthebuilding.Specifically,
matchingthecupoladesignoftheexistingbuildingwouldtiethetwostructurestogether
architecturally.
(e)Incorporateextensivelandscapinginexcessofwhatisrequiredbycode;
Comment:Thisrequirementisgenerallymet.Seelandscapingdiscussionbelow.
(f)Providehigh-qualitypark,openspace,andtrailopportunitiesthatexceedthe
expectationsestablishedintheComprehensivePlan;
Comment:Theschoolwillprovideanoutdoorclassroomexperience,including
constructingagazebosheltertobeintegratedwithsitelandscaping.Theparkshelter
willbedesignedwithfinishmaterialsconformingtotheprincipalschoolbuilding.
AspartofthePublicValuesStatement,theCityindicatedthattheapplicantshouldmake
anefforttodesignthenorthpartofthePUDcognizantofthefactthattrailfacilitiesmay
beimplementedalongtherailright-of-wayinthefuture.Theschoolshouldconsider
howthePUDdesignmightcatertobicycleorpedestrianaccessfromatrailtothenorth,
andgiventheaccessibilityofbicyclestothesite,howbicycleparkingfacilitiescanbe
provided.
(g)Provideaconvenientandefficientmulti-modaltransportationsystemtoservicethe
dailyneedsofresidentsatpeakandnon-peakuselevels,withhighconnectivitytothe
largercommunity.
Comment:ThesitecanalreadybeaccessedbyexistingCitysidewalks.Thesidewalks
willbeimpactedwithimplementationofabump-inatthefrontoftheproposedschool
building.Theapplicantintendstorestoreimpactedwalkspostconstruction.Sidewalks
alongthePUDsiteconnectnorthandsouthalongMapleStreet,andwestalong6th St.,
butdonotconnecteastalong5th or6th St.Theseadditionalsidewalkconnectionsarenot
indicatedintheCity’sTransportationorPark&TrailPlan.Inaddition,asdescribed
above,PUDapprovalmaybeanopportunitytorequestthattheschooladdressbicycle
accessandfacilitiesforteachersandchildren.Thesiteisnototherwiseaccessedby
publictransportation.
(h)Promotedevelopmentthatisdesignedtoreduceinitialinfrastructurecostsandlong-
termmaintenanceandoperationalcosts;
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
5
Comment:NonewinfrastructurecostswillbeincurredbytheCity.Inaddition,the
applicantshavechosenbuildingmaterialsfordurability,andareproposinglandscaping
thatwhenestablishedmayrequirelessmaintenancethentypicallawn.
(i)Whereapplicable,maximizetheuseofecologically-basedapproachestostormwater
management,restoreorenhanceon-siteecologicalsystems,andprotectoff-site
ecologicalsystemsincludingtheapplicationofLowImpactDevelopment(LID)
practices;
Comment:Theapplicantswillinstallnativeplantsmixesthroughoutthesite.Native
plantshavedeeprootsystemsthataidintheinfiltrationandfiltrationofstormwater
runoff.Proposednativeplantingswillalsoprovidehabitattobirds,insectsandsmall
mammals,whileservingasaneducationaltoolforschoolchildren.Additionaldetailwill
benecessaryforapprovalofstormwatermanagementproposalsbyCityEngineering
staff.
PUDREVIEW–FINALSTAGE
Asnoted,theFinalStagePUDreviewisintendedtoensurethatconditionsofpriorstage
approvalsareincorporatedintofinalplansandrezoningordinance,withaparticular
emphasisontheobjectiveslaidoutinthePublicValuesStatement.AcopyofthePublic
ValuesStatementadoptedfortheSwanRiverProjectisattachedasanexhibittothis
report.Below,theconditionsattachedtotheDevelopmentStageApprovalarereiterated,
withacommentastothelatestplansubmissions’statusofcompliance.
1.Theadditionofdormersordecorativefeatures(e.g.cupolasandskylight,etc.)to
theroofofthenewschoolbuildingtoaddinteresttotheupperportionofthe
building.Increasepitchofroof,ormirrorfeaturesfromexistingbuilding.The
applicantshaveaddedcupolafeaturestotheroofline,withglassandlighting,
consistentwiththecondition.Staffcontinuestorecommendthatthepitchof
theroofovertheentrybeincreasedtomirrorthepitchontheexistingschool
buildingfaçade.Afinalplanreflectingcomplianceofthisconditionandfinal
designofcupolaswillberequired.
2.TheschoolshouldconsiderhowthePUDdesignmightcatertobicycleor
pedestrianaccessfromatrailtothenorth(alongtherailROW),andgiventhe
accessibilityofbicyclestothesite,howbicycleparkingfacilitiescanbeprovided.
Thesitehasaccesstoapublicsidewalk,whichconnectstoapathwaynorthof
theadjacentrailroad.Inaddition,acrosswalkisbeingproposedacrossMaple
StreetwhichwouldprovidepedestrianaccessfromthesitetotheCommunity
Center.Studentarrivals(whetherbicycle,pedestrian,orautomobile)will
continuetobehandledattheexistingbuilding.
3.Proposeddogwoodshrubsshouldbecoupledwithadditionalshrubsorsmalltrees
throughoutthePUDsite.Alongtherailroadadditionalshrubs/smalltreesshould
beusedtocreateamoreopaquescreeningaffect,andalongthesouthandwest
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
6
propertylinesadditionalshrubs/smalltreesshouldbeaddedtocreateamore
continuousbufferthroughwintermonths.Recommendedspeciesinclude
viburnums,ninebarks,Americanelder,tallAmericanarborvitaevarieties(orother
evergreensadaptedtotheregion),etc.Theapplicantshaverevisedthe
landscapeplantoaccommodatethiscondition.
4.Theapplicantsshouldconsiderimplementingadditionalareasofshrubsorsmall
treesinassociationwithwoodland/shadetolerantseedmixesalongnorthandeast
portionsofthesite.Therearenumerouslowmaintenancenativeornon-native
cultivarsthatcanservethesefunctions(e.g.compactviburnumspecies,
ninebarks,dwarfbushhoneysuckles,chokeberries,whitecedars,serviceberriesor
othersmallfruitingtrees,fragrantsumac,etc.).Theapplicantshaverevisedthe
landscapeplantoaccommodatethiscondition.
5.TheapplicantshalladheretotreeprotectionsstandardsprovidedinChapter4
Section4.2oftheZoningOrdinance(notreeprotectioncurrentlyprovided).Tree
protectionisaconditionappliedduringtheconstructionandgradingprocess.
Replacementoftreesrequiredbytheordinanceismetwiththeproposedplan.
6.Provideamaintenanceplanforofseedmixes&shrub/treeplantings(removalof
invasivesorweeds,andreplacementofanydeadspecimens).Thisconditionhas
notyetbeenmet.Amaintenanceplanisnecessarytoensurethatthenative
landscapewillproperlythrive,andthatannualmaintenance(whichcan
includemowingorburning)isaddressedinanappropriatewaythatis
acceptabletotheCity,includingthefiredepartmentifapplicable.
7.Theapplicantsshallprovidealightingplanforreview,andaddressanydeviation
fromstandards.Theplanhasbeensubmitted,showinglightingmeetingthe
City’srequirements(lightedareasonlyundertheentrycanopyanddecorative
lightingintheglasscupolas).
8.Theapplicantsshallprovideasignageplan(ifany),andshouldaddressany
deviationfromstandards.Asignplanshowingasmallwallidentificationsign
meetingtheCity’sstandardsisincludedwiththecurrentplanset.
9.Implementationof(coloredstamped)perviouspaversinthelandscapingdesign,
asopposedtoaplainconcretewalk.Theapplicantshaveindicatedtheir
agreementwiththecondition,andwillneedtomarkthefinalplansetwitha
notationreflectingthisdesignrequirement.
10.Theproposedgrading,drainage,anderosioncontrolmeasuresaresubjectto
reviewandapprovalbytheCityEngineer.Theapplicantsarerequiredtoadhere
toanyrecommendationsfromtheCityEngineerasaconditionofPUDapproval.
Theapplicantshavebeenworkingwiththeengineeronmeetingthese
requirements.Astormwaterplanshowingtherequiredcalculationsisstill
forthcomingasapartofthisreview.
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
7
11.Theapplicantswillberesponsibleforpedestriancrossingimprovements,
includingsignage,andlong-termmaintenance.Thisconditionhaschanged
somewhatfromtheoriginalplan.TheCityEngineerisrecommendingthatthe
crossingbemovedfromitsoriginalmid-blocklocationtothecornerof5th
Streetsouthoftheexistingbuilding.Staffisrecommendingthefollowing
conditionsapplytothecrosswalk,regardlessoflocation:
a.Signageisaddedtonoteloading/unloadingonlyintheexisting“bump-
in”aisleeastofMaple.
b.Signageisaddedtolimitparkingintheproposed“bump-in”westof
Mapleforamaximumof15minutes.
c.Cross-walksaremarkedwithground-inpolypre-formmarkings.
d.Crosswalkismarkedwithablinkingpush-buttonsignvisibletoboth
directionsofMapleStreettrafficandadvancedcrosswalksignageis
placedthatmeetstherequirementsoftheCityEngineer.
IfthecrossingisapprovedbytheCityCouncilatthemid-blocklocationas
requestedandshownbytheapplicant,staffalsorecommendsthatearly
warningsignageisrequirednotifyingtrafficastheyapproachthecrosswalk
location,andthataschoolspeedzoneisdesignatedbytheCityCouncilbetween
4th Streetand6th Street,withappropriatesignage.Inaddition,theapplicants
wouldresponsibleformaintenanceofthecrosswalkandsignageatthemid-
blocklocation.
IftheCityCouncilrequiresthecornerlocationat5th Street,theCitywouldbe
responsibleformaintenancesinceitwouldbemorelikelytoservethebroader
community.Speedzoneswouldnotbenecessarywiththecornerlocation,and
signagewoulddiffersomewhat(althoughtheblinkingsignisstill
recommended).
12.Providedetailsoftheproposedgazebo,includingmaterialsanddimensions.
Uponinstallation,accessorystructuresmaynotexceed15feet.Thiscondition
hasbeenmet.
13.CompleteandsubmitFinalStagePUDdocumentsconsistentwiththerequired
conditionsofapprovalforinclusioninthefinalPUDordinanceanddevelopment
contract.Theplans,withmodificationsnotedherein,wouldsatisfythis
condition.
14.Executionofadevelopmentcontractsecuringtherequiredimprovements.A
developmentcontractdrafthasbeenpreparedandwillberequiredasapartof
therezoningapproval.
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
8
PUDDevelopmentContract
APUDDevelopmentContractreflectingtheapprovedplansandconditionsassociated
withthefinalstagePUDandrezoninghasbeenpreparedandisattachedforreviewand
approval.
Thecontractincludessecuritiesfortheproposedlandscaping,crosswalkimprovements
(pendingCouncildecisiononlocationanddesign)andsidewalkreconstruction
improvements.Theagreementalsorecognizesthecurrentsharedparkingarrangement
betweentheschoolandtheCityofMonticello’sCommunityCenterfacility.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
ThePlanningCommissionrecommendedrezoningofthepropertyaspartoftheir
considerationoftheconceptanddevelopmentstagerequests,perPCResolution
2014-016.
Decision1:FinalStagePlannedUnitDevelopmentforSwanRiverMontessori
Schoolat500and503MapleStreet.
1.MotiontoapprovetheFinalStagePUDsubjecttoconditionsidentifiedinExhibit
Z,withapedestriancrossingatthecornerof5th StreetandMapleStreet.
2.MotiontoapprovetheFinalStagePUDsubjecttoconditionsidentifiedinExhibit
Z,withapedestriancrossingmid-blockacrossMapleStreet.
3.MotiontodenytheFinalStagePUDatthistime.
Decision2:OrdinanceNo.592forrezoningtoPUD
1.MotiontoadoptOrdinanceNo.592forrezoning,basedonthefindingsaslisted
intheordinance.
2.MotiontodenyOrdinanceNo.592forrezoning,basedonfindingsestablishedby
Council.
Decision3:PlannedUnitDevelopmentandDevelopmentContract
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2014-044,approvingaPlannedUnitDevelopment
andDevelopmentContractforSwanRiverCharterSchool.Suchcontractshallbe
reflectiveoftheCityCouncil’sdecisionregardingcrosswalklocationanddesign.
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2014-044atthistime.
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
9
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsAlternative#1ineachofthese:approvaloftheFinalStagePUDin
Decision1,withtheconditionslistedinExhibitZ;approvalofrezoningtoPUDDistrict
inDecision2,withfindingsandconditionsidentifiedinOrdinance#592;andapprovalof
correspondingPlannedUnitDevelopmentandContractinDecision3viaResolution
#2014-044.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
ExhibitZ–ConditionsofApprovalforrezoningtoPUD
A.OrdinanceNo.592
B.Resolution#2014-044–PUDandDevelopmentContract
C.PublicValuesStatement
D.PlanningCommissionResolution2014-016
E.ProjectNarrative
F.TitlePagePlan
G.ExistingConditions/DemolitionPlan
H.SitePlan,Engineering
I.SitePlan,Architectural
J.LandscapePlan
K.ExteriorElevationsPlan
L.PreliminaryPUDPlan
M.GradingandErosionPlan
N.Engineer'sCommentLetter,April22nd,2014&informationonSchoolSpeed
Zones
O.PlannedUnitDevelopmentandDevelopmentContract
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
10
ExhibitZ–ConditionsofApproval
SwanRiverMontessoriSchoolFinalStagePUD
500and503MapleStreet
1.Thepitchoftheroofoverthenewentryshouldbeincreasedtomirrorthepitchonthe
existingschoolbuildingfaçade.
2.TheapplicantshalladheretotreeprotectionsstandardsprovidedinChapter4Section4.2of
theZoningOrdinance(notreeprotectioncurrentlyprovided).
3.Theapplicantprovideamaintenanceplanforofseedmixes&shrub/treeplantings(removal
ofinvasivesorweeds,andreplacementofanydeadspecimens).
4.Theapplicantswillneedtomarkthefinalplansetwithanotationreflectingthisdesign
requirement.
5.Theproposedgrading,drainage,anderosioncontrolmeasuresaresubjecttoreviewand
approvalbytheCityEngineer.Theapplicantsarerequiredtoadheretoany
recommendationsfromtheCityEngineerasaconditionofPUDapproval.Theapplicants
havebeenworkingwiththeengineeronmeetingtheserequirements.Astormwaterplan
showingtherequiredcalculationsisstillforthcomingasapartofthisreview.
6.Staffisrecommendingthefollowingconditionsapplytothecrosswalk,regardlessof
location:
a.Signageisaddedtonoteloading/unloadingonlyintheexisting“bump-in”aisleeastof
Maple.
b.Signageisaddedtolimitparkingintheproposed“bump-in”westofMaplefora
maximumof15minutes.
c.Cross-walksaremarkedwithgrind-inpolypre-formconstruction.
d.Crosswalkismarkedwithablinkingpush-buttonsignvisibletobothdirectionsofMaple
StreettrafficthatmeetstherequirementsoftheCityEngineer.
IfthecrossingisapprovedbytheCityCouncilatthemid-blocklocation(Alternative2),staff
alsorecommendsthatearlywarningsignageisrequirednotifyingtrafficastheyapproachthe
crosswalklocation,andthataschoolspeedzoneisdesignatedbytheCityCouncilbetween
4thStreetand6thStreet,withappropriatesignage.Inaddition,theapplicantswould
responsibleformaintenanceofthecrosswalkandsignageatthemid-blocklocation.
IftheCityCouncilrequiresthecornerlocationat5thStreet(Alternative1),theCitywould
beresponsibleformaintenancesinceitwouldbemorelikelytoservethebroader
community.Speedzoneswouldnotbenecessarywiththecornerlocation,andsignage
woulddiffersomewhat(althoughtheblinkingsignisstillrecommended).
7.CompleteandsubmitFinalStagePUDdocumentsconsistentwiththerequiredconditionsof
approvalforinclusioninthefinalPUDordinanceanddevelopmentcontract.
8.Executionofadevelopmentcontractsecuringtherequiredimprovements.
ORDINANCENO.592
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
ANORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE10OFTHEMONTICELLOCITYCODE,
KNOWNASTHEZONINGORDINANCE,BYESTABLISHINGTHESWANRIVER
PUDASAZONINGDISTRICTINTHECITYOFMONTICELLO,ANDREZONING
CERTAINLANDSTOTHISDISTRICT
THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFMONTICELLOHEREBYORDAINS:
Section1.Section2.4(P)–PlannedUnitDevelopments,Title10–ZoningOrdinanceis
herebyamendedbyaddingthefollowing:
(13)SwanRiverPUDDistrict
(a)Purpose.ThepurposeoftheSwanRiverPUDDistrictistoprovidefor
thedevelopmentofcertainpropertiesforelementaryandsecondary
schoolactivitiesanduses.Thepurposeofthedistrictshallincorporate
thePublicValuesStatementofrecord,asmaybeamended,adopted
jointlybythePlanningCommissionandCityCouncilasofJanuary27,
2014.
(b)PermittedUses.PermittedprincipalusesintheSwanRiverPUD
DistrictshallbeElementaryandSecondarySchool,subjecttothe
approvedFinalStageDevelopmentPlansanddevelopmentagreement,
asmaybeamended.
(c)AccessoryUses.Accessoryusesshallbethosecommonlyaccessoryand
incidentaltoelementaryandsecondaryschools,andasidentifiedbythe
approvedfinalstagePUD.
(d)DistrictPerformanceStandards.Performancestandardsforthe
developmentofanylotintheSwanRiverPUDDistrictshalladhereto
theapprovedfinalstagePUDplansanddevelopmentagreement.Only
whereanyproposedimprovementisnotaddressedbythefinalstage
PUD,theregulationsoftheCCD,CentralCommunityDistrictshall
apply.
(e)WherechangestothePUDareproposedinthemannerofuse,density,
siteplan,developmentlayout,orbuildingsize,massorcoverage,orany
otherchange,theproposershallapplyforanamendmenttoPUDunder
thetermsoftheMonticelloZoningOrdinance,Section2.4(P)(10).The
CitymayrequirethatsubstantialchangesinoveralluseofthePUD
propertybeprocessedasanewproject,includingazoningdistrict
amendment.
ORDINANCENO.592
Section2.ThezoningmapoftheCityofMonticelloisherebyamendedtorezonethe
followingdescribedparcelsfromCCDandR-3,respectively,toSwanRiver
PUDDistrict:
{insertlegals}
Section3.TheCityClerkisherebyinstructedtomarktheofficialzoningmaptoreflectthis
ordinance.Themapshallnotberepublishedatthistime.
Section4.TheCityClerkisherebydirectedtomakethechangesrequiredbythisOrdinance
aspartoftheOfficialMonticelloCityCode,Title10,ZoningOrdinance,andto
renumberthetablesandchaptersaccordinglyasnecessarytoprovidetheintended
effectofthisOrdinance.TheCityClerkisfurtherdirectedtomakenecessary
correctionstoanyinternalcitationsthatresultfromsaidrenumberingprocess,
providedthatsuchchangesretainthepurposeandintentoftheZoningOrdinance
ashasbeenadopted.
Section4.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafteritspassageand
publication.RevisionswillbemadeonlineafteradoptionbyCouncil.Copiesof
thecompleteZoningOrdinanceareavailableonlineandatMonticelloCityHall.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis28thdayofApril,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
__________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
VOTINGINFAVOR:
VOTINGINOPPOSITION:
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-044
APPROVINGPLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENTANDDEVELOPMENTCONTRACT
FORSWANRIVERCHARTERSCHOOL
WHEREAS,theMonticelloPlanningCommissionheldapublichearingonApril4,2014,for
theconsiderationofConceptandDevelopmentStagePlannedUnitDevelopmentforaK-12
EducationalInstitutioninanR-3(MediumDensityResidence)DistrictandCCD(Central
CommunityDistrict)forSwanRiverMontessori;and
WHEREAS,aftertakingpubliccomment,thePlanningCommissionrecommendedapprovalof
theConceptandDevelopmentStagePlannedUnitDevelopmentandPUDrezoningtotheCity
Council;and
WHEREAS,arequestwasmadebySwanRiverBuildingCommitteeforapprovalofFinalState
PlannedUnitDevelopmentandanagreementpreparedforPlannedUnitDevelopmentand
DevelopmentContractforSwanRiverCharterSchool;
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA,thatthePlannedUnitDevelopmentandDevelopmentContractforSwanRiver
CharterSchoolisherebyapproved,subjecttoconditionsofapprovalforPUDdevelopmentas
statedinthedevelopmentagreement.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis28thdayofApril,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
_______________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
Public Values Statement
Swan River Montessori
Planned Unit Development at:
Lots 6 & 7 of Block 10, Original Plat of Monticello, and
Lots 8, 9 & 10 of Block 11, Original Plat of Monticello
This document establishes the “Public Values Statement” for the proposed Planned Unit
Development District to be created on the properties located at 503 and 500 Maple
Street, between 4th St. W. and 5th St. W. in the downtown Monticello area. The
document is the product of collaborative work between the applicant and the City,
including a joint Developer - City Council – Planning Commission meeting. The Public
Values Statement is intended to lay out the goals and policy standards that the
developer will utilize in the design of their project, and the City will uti lize in evaluating
the various staged applications for PUD approvals.
1. The applicants and the City would like the architecture of the proposed school
building to conform to the architecture on the existing Swan River Montessori
school building. Continuity of architectural materials between the two related
school buildings is more important than architectural style. In addition, the
applicants would like the buildings to feature green options (i.e. steel roof
shingles, native landscaping, and geothermal heating and cooling), some of
which may vary from traditional visible forms in Monticello. The City supports this
approach in general, pending details in the specific plans.
2. The proposed PUD site includes a Central Community District parcel, guided for
downtown land uses, and an R-3 Medium Density Residential District parcel,
guided as a “Place to Live.” The PUD will encompass two Swan River
Montessori school buildings, which are an institutional use compatible with both
districts. However, because a new school building will be developed on a
previously residential parcel adjacent to other residential parcels, the City would
like to see the development emphasize screening and landscaping, in order to
make the institutional site less intrusive from adjacent residential parcels.
Methods for doing so may include the creation of a continuous landscaping
hedge buffer around the school site.
3. The developer would like to implement native landscaping around the new school
site, to serve school activities, beautify the site, and treat stormwater movement
across the site. Native plantings need to adhere to City objectives for
landscaping requirements as pertains to size and location, and shall be managed
over time to preserve the quality of plantings and prevent invasion from invasive
species and weeds.
4. The City and developer will work together to manage traffic patterns around the
PUD site, and promote safe pedestrian movement between the adjacent school
buildings. The proposed building is not intended to serve an increase in
enrollment, but rather will provide improved schoo l spaces for existing enrollees.
As there will be no increase in density on the site, the developer is not proposing
additional parking or drives. Rather, the developer would like to explore traffic
design intended to prevent traffic congestion on the public right of way and
increase traffic control for pedestrian safety. Methods for doing so may include
the implementation of crosswalks on Maple Street and the creation of bump ins
on the road for parking or deliveries outside of the new school building.
5. The City confirms that the proposed development and its proposed land use is
consistent with the intent and direction of the City’s future land use plans for the
area.
6. Benefits of the use of PUD on this property include allowing the expansion and
improvement of a valued educational institution in the downtown area . As
described, the new school building does not coincide with an increase in the
student population, but instead is intended to supplement the existing curriculum.
New parking and driveway facilities are required, but a PUD designation is
applicable to facilitate the interaction of the two related school sites. Other
benefits include attractive, environmentally sensitive architecture, and managed
traffic access and circulation patterns that will fit within the context of the
downtown area.
7. The City expresses its intent to permit flexibility in site access, parking supply,
architecture, and landscaping which may not be otherwise available to the
development of individual parcels.
Pursuant to these values and declarations, the applicant has expressed an interest in
seeking development of the subject property under the regulations of the City’s Planned
Unit Development ordinance, and has received encouragement from City officials to
proceed with formal applications and the required public process. The adoption of this
Public Values Statement does not bind the applicant to a specific design, nor does it
bind the City to a general approval of a PUD request. However, this statement
expresses the good will of both applicant and City in pursuing the current course, in
general anticipation of successful project approvals based on current information.
Project Narrative
Swan River Montessori School
Proposed Expansion
10 February 2014
Rev. 29 March 2014
This narrative is for the proposed Planned Unit Development District to be created on the
properties located at 503 and 500 Maple Street, between 4th St. W. and 5th St. W. in the
downtown Monticello area. This narrative will look at the design of the proposed Project as it
relates to the Public Values Statement adopted by the City Council at its meeting 27 January
2014.
At the time of its original programming, design, and construction it could have not be anticipated
that the school would be called upon to serve a special population of students. As school
programs have evolved to handle these special groups it has attempted to satisfy new
programming within the limits of a building not designed to accommodate them. This school
expansion will not increase the population of students and staff but will provide a more
appropriate environment in which to realize the success for all students served.
The Project building design has been patterned directly from the design of the existing building
located across the street at 500 Maple Street. In some cases exterior building materials will be
upgraded from those in previous construction. It is proposed that the new construction employ
fiber reinforced cement lap siding, a manufactured stone base with watertable, and a steel
roofing panel that will resemble traditional shingles. All materials will provide factory finishes for
permanence and low maintenance.
The similarity of materials and the building orientation is intended to create a sort of campus feel
to the school as a whole and provide continuity for the students. Materials and their use reflect a
traditional residential style that will blend with the character of the existing neighborhood.
In additional to the building design and finish materials, there is a desire to be sensitive to the
adjacent residential uses in the use of landscaping materials. The Project proposes the use of a dense,
screening buffer along the north, south, and west property lines for screening and as a physical barrier
for students. The Project is designed to retain establish, mature growth trees in order to preserve the
overstory canopy.
The school proposes to provide the bulk of groundcover plantings in Minnesota traditional prairie
species. This approach will be beneficial, providing educational opportunities as well as enhancing the
school property. Incorporation of native species provides plant species that are appropriately
acclimatized for our geographical area. These species will naturally provide a dense planting reducing
the ability for weeds to grow, much as with healthy lawn plantings. Native species are appropriate for
our normal water issues, tolerant to our water cycles and provide for means of natural stormwater
management. The mix of prairie grasses and flowering species provides for season long interest and
habitat.
As a part of the educational programming, the school desires to provide an outdoor classroom
experience. This program element is proposed to be accommodated by a park shelter or gazebo
structure to the southwest portion of the site. This structure will be provided with finish materials as
for the principal building, feature open sides, and be integrated within the landscaping to enhance
classroom activities. There will be one concrete sidewalk from the south building entrance to the
gazebo for accessibility, the remainder of the paths on site will be via wood mulch.
We have been in contact with the City Planner and Engineer to discuss methods for safe pedestrian
movement and, of course, it is the schools desire to assure safe movement between the two buildings
for students and staff. While it is thought that the possibility exists for lighting and call controls, that
the best approach would be to provide basic pedestrian controls at this time and observe how
pedestrian movements integrates with street traffic.
The Project will provide a striped pedestrian crosswalk with both signage at the crosswalk and
advanced signage as shown on the plans. Additionally, the new building is sited in a manner to
provide the entrance in direct orientation to the entrance of the existing school building. This will
provide an obvious and direct path for students transitioning between buildings as well as enhancing
the campus feel of the overall school. It should also be noted that students moving between buildings
are supervised and movement occurs at scheduled times during the day.
As a part of the building orientation, we are proposing as a part of the Planned Unit Development, a
reduction in the yard requirements from the R-3 zoning classification. The setback from the railroad
right-of-way to the north is proposed to be reduced from the 25’-0” required for R-3 uses to 15’-0”.
This reduction allows the building entrances to be more closely oriented as well as providing for a
larger yard to the south of the building to enhance educational programs.
The design program for the Project considers movement of students and staff between buildings and is
providing for a covered walk extending from the vestibule entry of the new structure to the public
walk along Maple Street. This provides enhanced protection from the weather and provides for
additional visual continuity between the two buildings, further reinforcing the campus intent. As a
result, we propose a front yard reduction from the 30’-0” proscribed for the R-3 district to a zero lot
line setback as for the CCD district in which the present school facility is located. This will allow the
vestibule and canopied walk to reach closer to the public walk as well as providing a larger yard to the
west of the building enhancing school programs and preserving the mature overstory trees there.
Because there is no increase in student or staff population because of the school expansion, existing
parking is considered to be adequate to serve the new building. The existing building remains first and
last destination for students and staff for each day’s activity so the existing parking facility will
continue to serve the needs. As such, no new off-street parking is being provided on the new site as
outlined in the Public Values statement. In the rare event that a special drop-off or pick-up is
necessary, we propose a drop-off “bump-in” along the west side of Maple Street, approximately
mirroring that presently provided for the existing building.
The Conditions of Approval suggest consideration for access from a trail to the north and for
pedestrian and bicycle access. We will be maintaining the public sidewalk from the north which
provides access for both bicycles and pedestrians. Providing bicycle parking, however, would be
counter to the purpose of the facility. Student’s first and last destination of the day is to the existing
facility. Students accessing the proposed facility will do so under the supervision of staff and will not
be permitted to use their bicycles.
The school intends to utilize the existing refuse facilities of the existing school to fill the needs for the
expansion. This will require no new trash enclosure or off-street loading for this Project.
Because there is no anticipated increase in population, that present parking facilities will serve the
entire campus, and existing student and staff drop-off/pick-up movements will remain, we anticipate
no change to the traffic patterns no additional pressure to the streets surrounding the Project from
their present levels.
At the present time, pending approvals and bidding, we anticipate beginning construction during April
of this years with the proposed completion and occupancy for the beginning of the 2014/1015 school
year.
It is the desire of the school to continue to be valued part of the Monticello community and so we are
attempting to work within the guidelines of the R-3 district. We believe that we can accommodate the
program needs of the proposed facility while seeking adjustments, primarily, to the yard requirements
of the R-3 discussed.
School Zone Speed LimitsSchool Zone Speed Limits
SCHOOL ZONE SPEED LIMITS THE TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
Ensuring the safety of children on public streets near schools is Mn/DOT developed the booklet “A Guide to Establishing Speed
the responsibility of parents, school officials and road Limits in School Zones” that is a comprehensive safety outlook
authorities. Parents must provide basic training and and is the prescribed method as required by MS 169.14. Three
supervision in order to develop safe behavior and serve as role distinct components are addressed-
models. School officials must support and encourage ! The School Route Plan
educational safety programs and methods for walking or ! Hazard Identification
biking students. Road authorities must provide a safe ! Education.
environment on the street by using proven traffic control
methodologies that will minimize the crash probability. The main objective of the School Route Plan is to establish
walking routes that minimize the number of streets crossed and to
THE LAW maximize the safety of approved crossings used by children on
Each road authority may establish school zone speed limits on the entire trip to school.
roads under their jurisdiction. In order to provide an objective, Hazard Identification addresses nine issues using the school
uniform and safe environment for walking and biking students, route plan and evaluates each street for what is present as well as
Minnesota law requires a traffic investigation as prescribed by what can be changed to enhance the safety of the planned routes.
the Commissioner of Transportation prior to establishing a
school zone speed limit. A quick summary:
1) Roadway geometry- crossing narrower roads in straight
The school zone is legally defined as that section of road sections with good sight distance increases the safety to
which abuts the school grounds, or where there is an pedestrians.
established school crossing with advance school signs that 2) Traffic volume- low volume roads are safer to cross. High
define the area. If a reduced school speed limit is warranted:volume roads will require adult crossing guards for maximum
- It shall not be more than 30 MPH below the establish speed safety.
limit 3) Pedestrian volumes- number of pedestrians can determine
- The school speed limit shall not be lower than 15 MPH signal timing or necessitate additional traffic control.
- All signs erected must be in conformance to the Minnesota 4) Parking- parking should be banned in the immediate area of
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Any speeding any school crossing.
violations of a school zone speed limit are subject to a double 5) Traffic Control Devices- these should be reviewed to verify
fine. they are operating correctly and signs are not hidden by
vegetation.
SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIAN CRASHES 6) Sidewalks - children walking in the street is dangerous.
While safety is emphasized near schools, pedestrian crash Continuous sidewalks that do not intermittently disappear and
experience requires a broader look. A Minnesota study force children into the road are the best.
revealed that 88 percent of school age pedestrian crashes 7) Fencing-strategically placed fencing can change walking
occurred more than one block from school. Similar studies in patterns and prevent dangerous mid-block crossing. At
Idaho showed only 13 percent of school age pedestrian crashes playgrounds, it prevents errant kick-balls from rolling into the
occurred in a school zone but 31 percent occurred on the trip to street and causing children to chase them from between parked
school. Other states have confirmed similar results. The cars.
statistics point out that location is NOT the predominant factor, 8) Crash History - crash investigation can reveal locations
suggesting that safety education for pedestrians has the where remedial measures may not be working and pedestrians
greatest potential for improvement since they can use it at all should be routed away from these areas.
locations. 9) Speed zones- if all other measures have been addressed and a
reduced speed is still required to safely navigate the school zone,
Further insights can be gathered from analysis of then a school zone speed limit should be considered. Trained
circumstances contributing to school age crashes. engineering personnel should design speed limits based on the
- Most crashes occurred when the child dashed from behind limiting criteria and arbitrary blanket values should be avoided.
parked cars
- Many crashes occur at mid-block locations As noted before, education is the most important. All the best
- Kindergarten through third grade pedestrians had efforts of engineering and planning will be lost if the pedestrian is
considerable difficulty understanding traffic control devices. unaware of the safe routes and safe practices. Children are rarely
involved in crashes while crossing properly. Education is not the
In realization of these facts it is apparent that school age child singular responsibility of one group or person, it requires a
safety is not a singular issue of speed limits. Real partnership and commitment from all.
improvements in safety require a comprehensive study of the
school trip and each environment must be specifically
addressed.
Shall be greater than 200 feet
Not more than 700 feet
from School grounds
Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
Signing for School Area Traffic Control
Prepared by the Office of Traffic Engineering and ITS
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/speed
SCH
O
O
L PR
O
PER
T
Y LI
N
E
SCH
O
O
L PR
O
PER
T
Y LI
N
E
SCHOOL
OR
OR
SCHOOL
WHEN
ARE PRESENTCHILDREN
END
ZONE
SCHOOL
END
ZON E
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
WHEN
AREPRESENTCHILDREN
20
SPEED
LIMIT
XX
SPEED
LIMIT
XX
SPEED
LIMIT
20
SPEED
LIMIT
OR XXX
FEETAHEAD
ORXXX
FEET AHEAD
F:\CityClerk\agendas\CouncilAgendas\2014CouncilAgendas\04-28-14\7Cn-WSBLTR-SwanRiver042314.doc
Infrastructure Engineering Planning Construction701XeniaAvenueSouth
Suite300
Minneapolis,MN55416
Tel:763541-4800
Fax:763541-1700
April23,2014
Ms.AngelaSchumann
CommunityDevelopmentDirector
CityofMonticello
505WalnutStreet,Suite1
Monticello,MN55362
Re:SwanRiverMontessoriSchool
Mid-blockCrossingReview
WSBProjectNo.1494-850
DearMs.Schumann:
Wehavereviewedthefinalstageplannedunitdevelopmentdocumentsrelatedtotheproposed
mid-blockcrossingproposedbySwanRivertobelocateddirectlyacrossfromtheirexisting
schoolandproposednewschoolbuilding.Asdiscussedwiththeapplicantandstaff,weofferthe
followingcommentsrelatedtotheproposedmid-blockcrossing.
Mid-blockcrossingsarenotstandardengineeringpractice,particularlyifanexisting
controlledintersectionisincloseproximitywhereyouwouldtypicallyexpectpedestrians
tocross.TheintersectionofMapleStreetand5th Streetisincloseproximitytothe
proposedmid-blockcrossingandtheexistingschoolbuildingislocatedatthiscorner
withsidewalkfrontingalongthebuildingallowingforpedestrianaccesstothe
intersection.Mid-blockcrossingsaretypicallynotwhereyouexpecttofindpedestrians
crossingastreetsincetheseareasdonothave“stopped”conditionsasisthecasewitha
typicalintersection.
Itisnotrecommendedthatcrossingbeplacedinanareawherecars,deliveryvehicles,
staff,childrenandthegeneralpublicarelikelytobeinconflict.Thelocationofthe
proposedmid-blockcrossingmayrequirestaffandchildrentostepbetween,oroutfrom
behindvehiclesfromanobstructedpositiontocrossthestreetmid-block.Thisisnot
somethingadriveronMapleStreetor5th Streetmayexpecttoencounter,increasingthe
opportunityforconflict.ProvidingacrosswalkattheintersectionofMapleStreetand5th
Streetcanprovideclearervisibilitybymotoristofthepedestrians,andpedestriansaclear
viewofthemotoristsinalldirections.
Toexpandonthis,vehiclesmakingarightturnfrom5th StreettonorthboundMaple
Street,mayhaveanobstructedviewofthepedestriancrossingatamid-blocklocationif
avehicleisinadeliveryordropoff/pickupzone.Likewisethepedestriansmaybe
obstructedbytheparkedvehiclefromseeingtherightturningvehicleoranyvehicleson
Ms.AngelaSchumann
April23,2014
Page2
F:\CityClerk\agendas\CouncilAgendas\2014CouncilAgendas\04-28-14\7Cn-WSBLTR-SwanRiver042314.doc
MapleStreet.Thisconditionismadeworsebytheturningvehiclestendencytolookleft
asyouturnrighttocheckforoncomingtrafficthatisnorthboundonMapleStreet.This
maynotgiveadequatereactiontimetoavoidconflictsatthemid-blockcrossing.
Theproposedmid-blockcrossingcreatesalongerwalkingpathwiththeinclusionofthe
proposedbumpout,asopposedtohavingthecrossingattheintersectionwhichisa
shorterpathandmayresultinlesschanceforconflicts.Typicallyamid-blockcrossingis
locatedwherethestreetisnarrowedatthatpointwith“bump-ins”,asisthecaseatthe
mid-blockcrossingonSchoolBoulevardacrossfromtheHighSchool.
Ithasbeenindicatedbytheapplicantthatwhenstudentsarecrossing,acrossingguard
andastaffmemberwillbepresent.However,theCityshouldconsiderthattheproposed
mid-blockcrossingcouldbeusedbythegeneralpublicandnotjusttheschoolstudents
andstaff,sinceitiswithinapublicstreet.Thismayposeanincreasedliabilitytothe
City.
TheCityshouldconsiderdesignatingMapleStreetbetween4th Streetand6th Streetasa
schoolzonewithareducedspeedlimitto20mphwhileschoolisinsession.Applicable
signageshouldbeinstalledwiththisdesignation.Thesigningwouldbesimilartothe
schoolspeedzoneonSchoolBoulevard.Enclosedareguidelinesfortheseschoolzones.
Basedontheabovecomments,whicharefromanengineeringperspective,wewould
recommendthecrossingbeplacedatthenearestintersectionof5th StreetandMaple
Streetandincludethefollowing:
ProvideamarkedcrosswalkacrossMapleStreetonthenorthsideof5th
Street.
ConstructADApedestrianrampandconnectiontoexistingsidewalkin
thenorthwestquadrantoftheintersection.
Includeappropriatesignageinadvanceandattheproposedcrosswalk.
ShouldtheCouncildecidestoapprovethemid-blockcrossingasproposedbythe
applicant,thefollowingmeasuresarerecommended:
“Busloadingandun-loadingonly”signsshouldbeplacedontheexisting
bump-outontheeastsideofMapleStreet.Thiswouldimplythatcarsare
notallowedtoparkinthisarea,whichwouldlessenthechanceofthe
obstructedconflictsasdescribedabove.
“15minuteparkingonly”signsshouldbeplacedalongtheproposed
bump-outonthewestsideofMapleStreettolimitthetimeforacarto
park,whichwouldlessenthechangeoftheobstructedconflictsas
describedabove.
Ms.AngelaSchumann
April23,2014
Page3
F:\CityClerk\agendas\CouncilAgendas\2014CouncilAgendas\04-28-14\7Cn-WSBLTR-SwanRiver042314.doc
Ablinkingpushbuttonpedestriansigncouldbeplacedatthemid-block
crossingtoprovideawarenesstodriversonMapleStreetthatmaynot
expectthecrossing.Thissignwouldbesimilartothesignatthe
intersectionof7th StreetandWalnutStreet.
Pleasecontactmeat763-271-3236ifyouhaveanyquestionsorcommentsregardingthisletter.
Thankyou.
Sincerely,
WSB&Associates,Inc.
ShibaniK.Bisson,PE
CityEngineer
cc:SteveGrittman,NAC
EricMiller,SwanRiverMontessoriSchool
enclosure
skb
123767 1
(reservedforrecordinginformation)
PLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENT
ANDDEVELOPMENTCONTRACT
SWANRIVERCHARTERSCHOOL
AGREEMENT dated____________________,2014,byandbetweenthe CITYOFMONTICELLO,a
Minnesotamunicipalcorporation(“City”),and SRCSBUILDINGCOMPANY,aMinnesota
______________________(the“Developer”).
1.REQUESTFORPLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENTAPPROVAL.On___________,2014,
theCityapprovedOrdinance#592,approvingaPlannedUnitDevelopmentfor SWANRIVERCHARTER
SCHOOL (referredtointhisContractasthe“Development”).ThelandissituatedintheCountyofWright,Stateof
Minnesota,andislegallydescribedinExhibit“A”,attachedhereto.
2.CONDITIONSOFAPPROVAL.TheCityapprovedtheOrdinanceforPlannedUnit
Developmentfor SWANRIVERCHARTERSCHOOL basedontheconditionsthat:
a)Thepitchoftheroofoverthenewentryshouldbeincreasedtomirrorthepitchontheexisting
schoolbuildingfaçade.
b)TheapplicantshalladheretotreeprotectionsstandardsprovidedinChapter4Section4.2of
theZoningOrdinance(notreeprotectioncurrentlyprovided).
c)Theapplicantprovideamaintenanceplanforofseedmixes&shrub/treeplantings(removalof
invasivesorweeds,andreplacementofanydeadspecimens).
d)Theapplicantswillneedtomarkthefinalplansetwithanotationreflectingthisdesign
requirement.
e)Theproposedgrading,drainage,anderosioncontrolmeasuresaresubjecttoreviewand
approvalbytheCityEngineer.Theapplicantsarerequiredtoadheretoanyrecommendations
fromtheCityEngineerasaconditionofPUDapproval.Theapplicantshavebeenworking
123767 2
withtheengineeronmeetingtheserequirements.Astormwaterplanshowingtherequired
calculationsisstillforthcomingasapartofthisreview.
f)Regardingschoolcrosswalk:
i.Signageisaddedtonoteloading/unloadingonlyintheexisting“bump-in”aisle
eastofMaple.
ii.Signageisaddedtolimitparkingintheproposed“bump-in”westofMaplefora
maximumof15minutes.
iii.Cross-walksaremarkedwithground-inpolypre-formmarkings.
iv.Crosswalkismarkedwithablinkingpush-buttonsignvisibletobothdirectionsof
MapleStreettrafficandadvancedcrosswalksignageisplacedthatmeetsthe
requirementsoftheCityEngineer.
1.IfthecrossingisapprovedbytheCityCouncilatthemid-blocklocation
(Alternative2):
Earlywarningsignageisrequirednotifyingtrafficastheyapproach
thecrosswalklocation
AschoolspeedzoneisdesignatedbytheCityCouncilbetween4th
Streetand6thStreet,withappropriatesignage.
Applicantsareresponsibleformaintenanceofthecrosswalkand
signageatthemid-blocklocation.
g)CompleteandsubmitFinalStagePUDdocumentsconsistentwiththerequiredconditionsof
approvalforinclusioninthefinalPUDordinanceanddevelopmentcontract.
h)Executionofadevelopmentcontractsecuringtherequiredimprovements.
i)Theexistingsanitarysewerserviceservingthesitemayneedtobelinedasdeterminedinthe
field.Theassociatedcostforliningwillbetheapplicant’sresponsibility.
j)DrainageandutilityeasementsshallbeprovidedasrequiredbytheCityEngineerto
accommodateoffsitedrainageandassociatedon-sitestormsewer.
3.RIGHTTOPROCEED.Withinthedevelopment,theDevelopermaynotgradeorotherwise
disturbtheearth,removetrees,constructsewerlines,waterlines,streets,utilities,publicorprivateimprovements,or
anybuildingsuntilallthefollowingconditionshavebeensatisfied:1)thisagreementhasbeenfullyexecutedbyboth
partiesandfiledwiththeCityClerk,and2)thenecessarysecurityhasbeenreceivedbytheCity.
4.DEVELOPMENTPLANS.Thesiteshallbedevelopedinaccordancewiththeplanssubmittedfor
PlannedUnitDevelopmentandapprovedon_________________,2014,exceptasmodifiedbytheapproved
conditionsnotedherein.TheplansshallbeattachedtothisContract.
123767 3
A.ExistingConditionsPlan
B.SitePlan
C.LandscapePlan
D.ExteriorElevationsPlan
E.PreliminaryPUDPlan
F.GradingandErosionPlan
5.PHASEDDEVELOPMENT.FuturephasesofdevelopmentaresubjecttotheCity’sordinances
andregulations,includingthosepertainingtoamendmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopment.
6.LICENSE.TheDeveloperherebygrantstheCity,itsagents,employees,officersandcontractorsa
licensetoenterthepropertytoperformallworkandinspectionsdeemedappropriatebytheCityinconjunctionwith
development.
7.EROSIONCONTROL,STORMWATERCONTROLANDSTREETCLEANUP.OnMay
___,2014,theCityapprovedaGrading&ErosionControlPlan.Priortoinitiatingsitegrading,theerosioncontrol
planshallbeimplementedbytheDeveloperandinspectedandapprovedbytheCity.TheDevelopershallclean
dirtanddebrisfromstreetsthathasresultedfromsiteandconstructionworkintheplatbytheDeveloperorany
otherpersonorentity.Thepartiesrecognizethattimeisoftheessenceincontrollingerosion.IftheDeveloperdoes
notcomplywiththeerosioncontrolplanandscheduleorsupplementaryinstructionsreceivedfromtheCity,or
repeatedlyfailstocleanandsweepstreets,theCitymaytakesuchactionasitdeemsappropriate,includingthe
performanceofthenecessaryworkbyCitystafforcontractingtohaveitperformed.Chargesincurredwiththe
enforcementoferosioncontrolaretheresponsibilityofthedeveloper.TheCitywillendeavortonotifythe
Developerinadvanceofanyproposedaction,butfailureoftheCitytodosowillnotaffecttheDeveloper'sand
City'srightsorobligationshereunder.Nositeandconstructionworkwillbeallowedandnobuildingpermitswill
beissuedunlessthedevelopmentisinfullcompliancewiththeapprovederosioncontrolplanandstormwater
controlmeasuresareinplace.
8.PERMITS.TheDevelopershallobtainorrequireitscontractorsandsubcontractorsto
obtainallnecessarypermits,includingbutnotlimitedto:
MinnesotaDepartmentofHealthforWatermains
NPDESPermitforStormwaterConnections
123767 4
MPCAforSanitarySewerandHazardousMaterialRemovalandDisposal
DNRforDewatering
CityofMonticelloforGradingPermits
CityofMonticelloforUtilityConnections,RightofWayandExcavationPermits
9.OWNERSHIPOFIMPROVEMENTS.Uponcompletionoftheworkandconstructionrequired
bythisContract,theimprovementslyingwithinpubliceasementsshallbecomeCitypropertywithoutfurthernoticeor
action.Regardingthemid-blockcrossing,thefollowingcontrolsshallapply.
SUBJECTTOCOUNCILAPPROVALREGARDINGMID-BLOCKCROSSWALK:
Busloadingandun-loadingonly”signsshouldbeplacedontheexistingbump-out
ontheeastsideofMapleStreet.Thiswouldimplythatcarsarenotallowedtopark
inthisarea,whichwouldlessenthechanceoftheobstructedconflictsasdescribed
above.
“15minuteparkingonly”signsshouldbeplacedalongtheproposedbump-outon
thewestsideofMapleStreettolimitthetimeforacartopark,whichwouldlessen
thechangeoftheobstructedconflictsasdescribedabove.
Ablinkingpushbuttonpedestriansigncouldbeplacedatthemid-blockcrossingto
provideawarenesstodriversonMapleStreetthatmaynotexpectthecrossing.
Thissignwouldbesimilartothesignattheintersectionof7th StreetandWalnut
Street.
TheCityhasdesignatedMapleStreetbetween4th Streetand6th Streetasaschool
zonewithareducedspeedlimitto20mphwhileschoolisinsession.Applicable
signageshallbeinstalledbytheDeveloperconsistentwiththisdesignation.
TheDevelopershallberesponsibleforallmaintenanceandrepairsassociatedwith
themid-blockcrossingandassociatedcrosswalksignage.
10.STORMSEWERAREACHARGE.Nostormsewerareaandpondingchargesare
applicableduetothepreviouslydevelopednatureofthesubjectparcels.
11.SANITARYSEWERAREACHARGE.Nosanitarysewerareachargesareapplicabledue
tothepreviouslydevelopednatureofthesubjectparcels.
12.WATERMAINAREA CHARGE.Nowatermainareachargesareapplicableduetothe
previouslydevelopednatureofthesubjectparcels.
123767 5
13.SUMMARYOFCASHREQUIREMENTS.Thefollowingisasummaryofthecash
requirementsunderthisContractwhichmustbefurnishedtotheCitypriortothetimeoffinalplatapproval:
PlanReview/Inspection$3000.00
Concept/Development/FinalStagePUD
_______
TotalCashRequirements$3000.00
*Feesreconciledtoactualexpensesatcloseofproject.
14.SUMMARYOFSECURITYREQUIREMENTS.Toguaranteecompliancewiththe
termsofthisContract,includingtheconstructionoftheDeveloperInstalledPublicImprovements,the
DevelopershallfurnishtheCitywithacashescroworaletterofcredit,intheformattachedhereto,froma
bank("security")for $47,500.00.Theamountofthesecurityiscalculatedasfollows:
SiteGradingandRestoration($3000/acre)$3000.00
Landscaping(equivalenttocostofimprovements)10,000.00
CrosswalkandSignageInstallation(equivalenttocostofimprovements)10,000.00
StreetandSidewalkConstruction(equivalenttocostofimprovements)15,000.00
TOTALCOSTS $38,000.00
TOTALSECURITIES:TotalCostsX125%$47,500.00
Thisbreakdownisforhistoricalreference;itisnotarestrictionontheuseofthesecurity.Thebankshallbesubjectto
theapprovaloftheCityAdministrator.Thesecurityshallbeforanautomaticallyrenewingterm.TheCitymaydraw
downthesecurity,with30dayswrittennoticetoDeveloper,foranyviolationofthetermsofthisContractorifthe
securityisallowedtolapsepriortotheendoftherequiredterm.Ifthesecurityisdrawndown,theproceedsshallbe
usedtocurethedefault.Exceptforthelandscapingsecurity,uponreceiptofproofsatisfactorytotheCitythatwork
hasbeencompletedandfinancialobligationstotheCityhavebeensatisfied,withCityapprovalthesecuritymaybe
reducedfromtimetotimebyninetypercent(90%)ofthefinancialobligationsthathavebeensatisfied.Tenpercent
(10%)oftheamountscertifiedbytheDeveloper'sengineershallberetainedassecurityuntilallimprovementshave
beencompleted,allfinancialobligationstotheCitysatisfied,anyrequired"asconstructed"planshavebeenreceived
123767 6
bytheCity.TheCitystandardspecificationsforutilitiesandstreetconstructionoutlineproceduresforsecurity
reductions.Thelandscapingsecurityshallberetaineduntilallimprovementsarecompletedandtreesandother
vegetationhavebeenshowntosurvivefortwogrowingseasons.
15.CROSSEASEMENT.ThePlannedUnitDevelopmentissubjecttotheexistingcross-parking
conditionbetweenSwanRiverCharterSchoolandtheCityofMonticello,whichshallremainineffectwiththe
approvalofthisPlannedUnitDevelopment.
16.RESPONSIBILITYFORCOSTS.
A.TheDeveloperhasprovidedadepositforthereviewoftheproject.TheDevelopershallpay
allactualcostsinexcessofthedepositincurredbyitortheCityinconjunctionwiththedevelopmentforCity
administration,legal,engineeringandplanningexpensesincurredinconnectionwithapprovalandacceptanceofthe
developmentandpreparationofthisContract.Allexpenseswillbebilledatprojectcompletion.
B.TheDevelopershallholdtheCityanditsofficers,employees,andagentsharmlessfrom
claimsmadebyitandthirdpartiesfordamagessustainedorcostsincurredresultingfromdevelopment.The
DevelopershallindemnifytheCityanditsofficers,employees,andagentsforallcosts,damages,orexpenseswhich
theCitymaypayorincurinconsequenceofsuchclaims,includingattorneys'fees.
C.TheDevelopershallreimbursetheCityforcostsincurredintheenforcementofthis
Contract,includingengineeringandattorneys'fees.
D.TheDevelopershallpayinfullallbillssubmittedtoitbytheCityforobligationsincurred
underthisContractwithinthirty(30)daysafterreceipt.Ifthebillsarenotpaidontime,theCitymayhalt
developmentandconstructionuntilthebillsarepaidinfull.Billsnotpaidwithinthirty(30)daysshallaccrueinterest
attherateofeighteenpercent(18%)peryear.
E.Inadditiontothechargesreferredtoherein,otherchargesandspecialassessmentsmaybe
imposedsuchasbutnotlimitedtoseweravailabilitycharges("SAC"),Citywaterconnectioncharges,Citysewer
connectioncharges,andbuildingpermitfees.
17.DEVELOPER’SDEFAULT.IntheeventofdefaultbytheDeveloperastoanyoftheworktobe
performedbyithereunder,theCitymay,atitsoption,performtheworkandtheDevelopershallpromptlyreimburse
123767 7
theCityforanyexpenseincurredbytheCity,providedtheDeveloper,exceptinanemergencyasdeterminedbythe
City,isfirstgivennoticeoftheworkindefault,notlessthanforty-eight(48)hoursinadvance.ThisContractisa
licensefortheCitytoact,anditshallnotbenecessaryfortheCitytoseekaCourtorderforpermissiontoenterthe
land.WhentheCitydoesanysuchwork,theCitymay,inadditiontoitsotherremedies,assessthecostinwholeorin
part.
18.MISCELLANEOUS.
A.TheDeveloperrepresentstotheCitythatthedevelopmentcomplieswithallcity,county,
metropolitan,state,andfederallawsandregulations,includingbutnotlimitedto:subdivisionordinances,zoning
ordinances,andenvironmentalregulations.Iftheplatceasestocomplywithcounty,metropolitan,state,andfederal
lawsandregulations,theCitymay,atitsoption,refusetoallowconstructionordevelopmentworkuntiltheDeveloper
doescomply.UpontheCity'sdemand,theDevelopershallceaseworkuntilthereiscompliance.
B.ThirdpartiesshallhavenorecourseagainsttheCityunderthisContract.
C.BreachofthetermsofthisContractbytheDevelopershallbegroundsfordenialofbuilding
permits,includinglotssoldtothirdparties.
D.Ifanyportion,section,subsection,sentence,clause,paragraph,orphraseofthisContractis
foranyreasonheldinvalid,suchdecisionshallnotaffectthevalidityoftheremainingportionofthisContract.
E.TheactionorinactionoftheCityshallnotconstituteawaiveroramendmenttothe
provisionsofthisContract.Tobebinding,amendmentsorwaiversshallbeinwriting,signedbythepartiesand
approvedbywrittenresolutionoftheCityCouncil.TheCity'sfailuretopromptlytakelegalactiontoenforcethis
Contractshallnotbeawaiverorrelease.
F.ThisContractshallrunwiththelandandmayberecordedagainstthetitletotheproperty.
TheDevelopercovenantswiththeCity,itssuccessorsandassigns,thattheDeveloperiswellseizedinfeetitleofthe
propertybeingdevelopedand/orhasobtainedconsentstothisContract,intheformattachedhereto,fromallparties
whohaveaninterestintheproperty;thattherearenounrecordedinterestsinthepropertybeingfinalplatted;andthat
theDeveloperwillindemnifyandholdtheCityharmlessforanybreachoftheforegoingcovenants.
123767 8
G.Developershalltakeoutandmaintainorcausetobetakenoutandmaintaineduntilsix(6)
monthsaftertheCityhasacceptedthepublicimprovements,publicliabilityandpropertydamageinsurancecovering
personalinjury,includingdeath,andclaimsforpropertydamagewhichmayariseoutofDeveloper'sworkorthework
ofitssubcontractorsorbyonedirectlyorindirectlyemployedbyanyofthem.Limitsforbodilyinjuryanddeathshall
benotlessthan$500,000.00foronepersonand$1,000,000.00foreachoccurrence;limitsforpropertydamageshall
benotlessthan$200,000.00foreachoccurrence;oracombinationsinglelimitpolicyof$1,000,000.00ormore.The
Cityshallbenamedasanadditionalinsuredonthepolicy,andtheDevelopershallfilewiththeCityacertificate
evidencingcoveragepriortotheCitysigningtheplat.ThecertificateshallprovidethattheCitymustbegiventen
(10)daysadvancewrittennoticeofthecancellationoftheinsurance.
H.Eachright,powerorremedyhereinconferredupontheCityiscumulativeandinadditionto
everyotherright,powerorremedy,expressorimplied,noworhereafterarising,availabletoCity,atlaworinequity,
orunderanyotheragreement,andeachandeveryright,powerandremedyhereinsetforthorotherwisesoexisting
maybeexercisedfromtimetotimeasoftenandinsuchorderasmaybedeemedexpedientbytheCityandshallnot
beawaiveroftherighttoexerciseatanytimethereafteranyotherright,powerorremedy.
I.TheDevelopermaynotassignthisContractwithoutthewrittenpermissionoftheCity.The
Developer'sobligationhereundershallcontinueinfullforceandeffecteveniftheDevelopersellsapartorpartsofthe
plattedland.
19.NOTICES.RequirednoticestotheDevelopershallbeinwriting,andshallbeeitherhanddelivered
totheDeveloper,itsemployeesoragents,ormailedtotheDeveloperbycertifiedmailatthefollowingaddress:
__________________________________________________________________.NoticestotheCityshallbein
writingandshallbeeitherhanddeliveredtotheCityAdministrator,ormailedtotheCitybycertifiedmailincareof
theCityAdministratoratthefollowingaddress:MonticelloCityHall,505WalnutStreet,Monticello,Minnesota
55362.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
BY:___________________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
123767 9
(SEAL)
AND__________________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOFWRIGHT)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis________dayof______________,2006,by
ClintHerbstandbyJeffO’Neill,theMayorandCityAdministratoroftheCityofMonticello,aMinnesota
municipalcorporation,onbehalfofthecorporationandpursuanttotheauthoritygrantedbyitsCityCouncil.
______________________________________________
NOTARYPUBLIC
DEVELOPER:
SWANRIVERBUILDINGCOMPANY
BY:______________________________________
Its:
123767 10
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOFWRIGHT)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis________dayof______________,2006,by
__________________________________the___________________of________________________
___________________________,aMinnesota_______________,onitsbehalf.
______________________________________________
NOTARYPUBLIC
DRAFTEDBY:
CAMPBELL,KNUTSON
ProfessionalAssociation
317EagandaleOfficeCenter
1380CorporateCenterCurve
Eagan,MN55121
Telephone:651-452-5000
TMS
123767 11
IRREVOCABLELETTEROFCREDIT
No.___________________
Date:_________________
TO:CityofMonticello
505WalnutStreet
Monticello,Minnesota55362
DearSirorMadam:
Weherebyissue,fortheaccountof(NameofDeveloper)andinyourfavor,ourIrrevocableLetter
ofCreditintheamountof$____________,availabletoyoubyyourdraftdrawnonsightontheundersignedbank.
Thedraftmust:
a)Beartheclause,"DrawnunderLetterofCreditNo.__________,dated________________,2_____,
of(NameofBank)";
b)BesignedbytheMayororCityAdministratoroftheCityofMonticello.
c)Bepresentedforpaymentat(AddressofBank),onorbefore4:00p.m.onNovember30,
2015.
ThisLetterofCreditshallautomaticallyrenewforsuccessiveone-yeartermsunless,atleastforty-five(45)
dayspriortothenextannualrenewaldate(whichshallbeNovember30ofeachyear),theBankdeliverswritten
noticetotheMonticelloCityAdministratorthatitintendstomodifythetermsof,orcancel,thisLetterofCredit.
Writtennoticeiseffectiveifsentbycertifiedmail,postageprepaid,anddepositedintheU.S.Mail,atleastforty-five
(45)dayspriortothenextannualrenewaldateaddressedasfollows:MonticelloCityAdministrator,MonticelloCity
Hall,505WalnutStreet,Monticello,MN55362,andisactuallyreceivedbytheCityAdministratoratleastthirty(30)
dayspriortotherenewaldate.
ThisLetterofCreditsetsforthinfullourunderstandingwhichshallnotinanywaybemodified,amended,
amplified,orlimitedbyreferencetoanydocument,instrument,oragreement,whetherornotreferredtoherein.
ThisLetterofCreditisnotassignable.ThisisnotaNotationLetterofCredit.Morethanonedrawmaybe
madeunderthisLetterofCredit.
ThisLetterofCreditshallbegovernedbythemostrecentrevisionoftheUniformCustomsandPracticefor
DocumentaryCredits,InternationalChamberofCommercePublicationNo.500.
WeherebyagreethatadraftdrawnunderandincompliancewiththisLetterofCreditshallbedulyhonored
uponpresentation.
BY:____________________________________
Its______________________________
123767 12
CERTIFICATEOFINSURANCE
PROJECT:
CERTIFICATEHOLDER:CityofMonticello
505WalnutStreet
Monticello,Minnesota55362
INSURED:
ADDITIONALINSURED:CityofMonticello
AGENT:
WORKERS'COMPENSATION:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
COVERAGE-Workers'Compensation,Statutory.
GENERALLIABILITY:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
()ClaimsMade ()Occurrence
LIMITS:[Minimum]
BodilyInjuryandDeath:
$500,000foroneperson$1,000,000foreachoccurrence
PropertyDamage:
$200,000foreachoccurrence
-OR-
CombinationSingleLimitPolicy$1,000,000ormore
123767 13
COVERAGEPROVIDED:
OperationsofContractor:YES
OperationsofSub-Contractor(Contingent):YES
DoesPersonalInjuryIncludeClaimsRelatedtoEmployment?YES
CompletedOperations/Products:YES
ContractualLiability(BroadForm):YES
GovernmentalImmunityisWaived:YES
PropertyDamageLiabilityIncludes:
DamageDuetoBlastingYES
DamageDuetoCollapseYES
DamageDuetoUndergroundFacilitiesYES
BroadFormPropertyDamageYES
AUTOMOBILELIABILITY:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
(X)AnyAuto
LIMITS:[Minimum]
BodilyInjury:
$500,000eachperson$1,000,000eachoccurrence
PropertyDamage:
$500,000eachoccurrence
-OR-
CombinedSingleLimitPolicy:$1,000,000eachoccurrence
AREANYDEDUCTIBLESAPPLICABLETOBODILYINJURYORPROPERTYDAMAGEONANYOF
THEABOVECOVERAGES:
Ifso,list:Amount:$________________
[Nottoexceed$1,000.00]
123767 14
SHOULDANYOFTHEABOVEDESCRIBEDPOLICIESBECANCELLEDBEFORETHEEXPIRATION
DATETHEREOF,THEISSUINGCOMPANYWILLMAILTEN(10)DAYSWRITTENNOTICETOTHE
PARTIESTOWHOMTHISCERTIFICATEISISSUED.
Datedat_____________________________On__________________________________
BY:_________________________________
AuthorizedInsuranceRepresentative
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
1
7D.Considerationofauthorizingstafftopursueoptionsforprovidingaloanand
extendingtermofexistingfinancingtoSwanRiverBuildingCommitteeforSwan
RiverMontessorischoolexpansion (JO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilisaskedtoauthorizestafftopursuetheconceptofrefinancingtheexisting
contractfordeed($130,000balance)andthenadd$100,000ofadditionaldebtsupporting
developmentofthenewbuilding.IfCouncilapprovestheconcept,thenstaffandthe
CityAttorneywillresearchlegalmechanismsavailableforsupportingthisconceptand
willdeveloptheagreementsanddocumentsaccordingly.
GeneralProposal:TheSwanRiverBuildingCommitteeisrequestingthattheCityof
Monticelloextendthetermoftheinitialcontractfordeedprovidedin2004by10years
whileloaninganadditional$100,000toassistwiththefinancingofthenewaddition.
Thecontractfordeedcurrentlyinplaceisbasedona20yearterm.Paymentshave
alwaysbeenpaidontimewithacurrentbalanceofapproximately$130,000.Theinterest
rateforthenewloanis6%.Thenewloanbalancewouldamountto$230,000underthis
concept.
TheFinanceDirectorhasnotedthattheCityhassufficientfundsinreservetoborrowand
theinterestrateishigherthantheCitycanobtainfromotherrevenuesources.He
thereforesupportstheproposalfromacashflowstandpoint.
Inexchangefortheloan,theCommunityCenterwillhavefreesummermonthaccessto
bothalargemeetingspaceandanartsandcraftsarea.Thismeetingroomiswellsuited
forFriendshipIslandactivitiesorsimilarprogramming.SwanRiveriswillingtocommit
toutilizingthegymspaceforthetermoftheloanwhichadds10yearstotheoriginal
commitment.
TherelationshipbetweentheSwanRiverSchoolandtheCommunityCenterhasbeen
goodoverthepasttenyears.Basedonfeescurrentlypaid,overthenexttwentyyearsthe
feesderivedbytheCommunityCenterthroughpaymentoftheusagefeesareestimated
atover$1.2milliondollars.Inaddition,useoftheMCCgymbySwanRiverchildren
helpstomaximizethefacilityasthegymisonlylightlyusedbythepublicduringtheday
whenSwanRiverchildrenarepresent.Thereisagymdividerthatisusedtoseparate
SwanRiveractivitiesfromothersusingthegym.
Theelementsoftheprojectsupportingapublicpurposefindingtodayaresimilartothose
thattheCityCouncilcouldsitetoday,exceptthattheoriginal“loan”wasintheformofa
contractfordeedfortheland.TheCityhadthestatutoryauthoritytoenterintoa
contractfordeedandthelandprovidedsecurityincaseofdefault.Inthiscase,itisnot
completelycleariftheCityhasthedirectauthoritytoissuealoan,andadequatesecurity
ontheloanwouldneedtobeestablished.Presumingtheseissuescanbeworkedout,
thereareanumberofaspectsorelementsoftheprojectthatwouldbeincorporatedintoa
resolutionrecognizingthepresenceofapublicpurposeassociatedwiththeloan.
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
2
Enables10yearcontinuationofuseoftheoriginalfacilityplusadditionalfree
publicuseoflargemeetingspace(40X30)andrestroomfacilitiesforthesummer
months(3)for20years.MCCfeaturesa“FriendshipIsland”programforkids
thatisperfectlysuitedforthisroom.
Freeuseofartsandcraftsareaforthesummermonths–adjacenttothemeeting
space.
Cityhaskeytothefacilityduringthesetimes.
Opportunitytoschedulepublicuseofthemeetingspaceduringweeknights.This
isnotviewedasasignificantbenefitaschairsandtablesneedtobehauledover
everytimetheroomwouldbeusedbythepublic.
Interestrateonloanisgreaterthancurrentmarketrates.
SwanRivercommitstouseofMCCGymforanadditional20years.Thevalue
ofthiscommitmentisapproximately$25,000ormoreperyear.Thestudentsuse
thegymaroundnoonwhengymisotherwiseveryquiet.
Cityhasfirstrightofrefusalonpurchaseoffacilityintheeventofdefaultorsale.
IncreaserevenuegeneratedbytheCommunityCenterthroughthefacilitylease
andmembershipagreementwiththeSchool.
StimulateeconomicactivityintheCity’sdowntownarea.
A1.BudgetImpact:Thecostofattorneytimenecessarytosupportthistransaction.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:TimenecessarytoresearchandimplementCouncil
direction.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotionauthorizingstafftoworkwiththeSwanRiverBuildingCommitteein
researchingoptionsforfinancingofexistingdebtonacontractfordeedwithan
additional$100,000loan.
Underthisoption,staffwillworkwiththeCityAttorneyindevelopingoptions,if
any,forimplementingtheconceptdetailedinthisreport.
2.MotiondenyingauthorizationnotedunderAlternative#1.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendssupportofAlternative#1.ThesynergybetweentheMonticello
CommunityCenterandSwanRiverSchoolthatwashopedforin2004hasbeenachieved
andalongwiththat,thepublicpurpose.TheCommunityhasbenefittedfinanciallyand
fromaservicestandpointthroughthesharingofresourcesashoped.
Althoughtheconceptforprovidinganewloanhasmerit,thelegalmechanismfor
implementingthetransactionisyettobedetermined.Inaddition,supportingagreements
anddocumentsneedtobedevelopedandpreparedforfinalapproval.IfCouncilsupports
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
3
Alternative#1,thenstaffandtheSwanRiverBuildingCommitteewillstrivetocometo
thenextmeetingwithoptionsformakingtheloanalongwithrefinedagreementsand
documentssupportingthetransaction.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
CopyofContractforDeedandagreementsfrompreviousactionin2005
Copyofbuildingplanshowingmeetingroomandarts/craftspace
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
1
7E.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution2014-045amendingtheMonticello
ComprehensivePlan,Chapter3–LandUseasrelatedtoguidingprinciplesand
locationsforfuturehighdensityhousing.Applicant:CityofMonticello (NAC)
A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND:
Legal:NA
PlanningCaseNumber:2014-016
Request(s):Considerincorporatingspecificguidingprinciplesintothe
textofthehousingandlanduseportionsofthe
ComprehensivePlanrelatingtoappropriatelocationsfor
highdensityhousing.
DeadlineforDecision:NA
LandUseDesignation:PlacestoLive
ZoningDesignation:NA
Overlays/Environmental
RegulationsApplicable:NA
CurrentSiteUse:NA
SurroundingLandUses:NA
ANALYSIS
ThePlanningCommissionandCityCouncilmetinjointsessiontodiscussoptionsfor
implementingtheR-4ZoningDistrictinfuturedevelopmentproposals.WhentheR-4
districtwasestablished,itwasdesignedtobequiteprescriptiveinitsrequirements,with
thegeneralintentbeingthathighstandardsfordevelopmentquality(anotherwise
ambiguousphrase)wouldbeestablishedup-front.Thetradeforsignificantlyhigher
standardswasthewillingnesstoincreasedensity,andsometimesbuildingsize,to
accommodatethecostsandphysicalrequirementsimposedbythenewstandards.
LeftundeterminedatthetimeofadoptionofthedistrictwerepotentiallocationsforR-4
zoning.Itwasgenerallyunderstoodthattherewereawidevarietyofcriteriathatmay
contributetoanappropriate,orinappropriatelocationforhighdensitydevelopment.The
ComprehensivePlandoesnotdirecthigherdensitybylandusecategories–thegeneral
categoryof“PlacestoLive”isusedforallresidentialdevelopment.
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
2
Toaddressthisissuemoredirectly,theCityisconsideringtwoamendmentstohelp
identifypotentialhighdensityresidentiallanduses.Thoseamendmentsinclude
additionallanguageintheComprehensivePlanandtheR-4ZoningDistrictthatspecify
conditionsunderwhichtheCitywillconsiderpotentialrezoningsfromcurrent
designationstotheR-4District.
Factorsandprincipleswerediscussedatthejointworkshopreferredtoabove.There
wereseveralsuchconsiderationsthatcameoutoftheworkshop,withvaryingpriority
andcombinations.Alongwithageneralcommentthatfactorsworkincombination,and
nosinglefactorisdeterminative.Wehavesummarizedthosefactorsasfollows:
1.ReplacementLandUse.Thisfactorincorporatesanideathatinrezoningproperty
toR-4,someotherzoningcategorywillbelostonthesubjectsite.Theconsensus
ofthejointworkshopwasthatR-4zoningcouldfitthefollowingzoning
categoriesandcircumstances,withappropriateclarificationsspecifictoany
individualsite:
A.LandalreadyzonedR-3wouldlikelybeappropriatefortheR-4district:
B.Landcurrentlyzonedforcommercialuses,butwhichwouldnotbeconsidered
“prime”commercial,wouldlikelybeappropriateforR-4.
C.Landcurrentlyzonedforcommercialuses,butwhichwouldbeconsidered
“prime”,wouldnotlikelybeappropriateforrezoningtoaresidential
category,inanefforttoprotectthoseareasthatshowthemostpromisefor
commercialuseinthefuture.
2.Localtransportationnetwork.Accesstomajorstreets,orattheveryminimum,
avoidanceoftrafficgenerationthatwouldutilizelocalstreetsforlowerdensity
residentialareas,isarequirementofanR-4rezoningconsideration.
3.ArchitecturalCompatibilityandBuildingMassing.Thejointmeetingparticipants
generallyagreedthatwhenlocatedverynearlowerdensityresidentialareas,the
sizeandmassingofthebuildingorbuildingsintheR-4projectwouldbea
considerationfordenyinganR-4proposal.R-4projectswouldneedtobelower
profile,orscreenedandbufferedbydistanceandnaturalfeatures(suchasmature
treesandtopography)whennearlowdensityresidential.
4.Adequatepublicfacilities.Abaselinefactorformulti-familyresidentiallocation
wouldbearequirementforessentialpublicservicessuchasutilitiesandopen
space.HighqualityR-4propertywouldhavepositiverelationshipstopublic
parksand/orpathwayswithoutoverlyburdeningthem.Thiscanincludea
requirementtoprovideadditionalfacilitiestomeettheCity’sopenspaceplanning
policies.
5.ProximitytoLowerDensityResidentialNeighborhoods.Proximitytolower
densitywasnotconsideredtobeanautomaticdisqualifierforR-4zoning
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
3
consideration.Instead,amore“performance-based”combinationofthefactors
abovewouldprevailinsuchsituations.
6.ProximitytootherHighDensityResidentialNeighborhoods.Itwasnotedinthe
jointmeetingthatanover-concentrationofhighdensityresidentialcanbeafactor
thatleadstothenegativestereotypethathigh-densityhousingcarries.Assuch,
proximitytoothermulti-familyareasmaybeseenasanegative,dependingonthe
natureandconcentrationoftheexistinghousing.
Intheattachedresolutionandtext,anadditiontothelanduseandhousingmaterialst
reflectingtheseprinciplesisproposed,languagethatwouldalsobereflectedintheR-4
DistrictoftheZoningOrdinance.Withtheseamendments,theCitywouldbeableto
directfuturedevelopmentintereststoareasthatareconsideredtobeappropriatesitesfor
higher-densityhousing,whileretainingextensivediscretionoverLandUsePlanand
relatedrezoningactionsbasedonlocalizedconcernsonaparcel-by-parcelbasis.
PlanningCommissionRecommendation
ThePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingontheordinanceandtheattached
companionamendmenttotheComprehensivePlan,onApril1,2014.Noonefromthe
publicspoketotheproposedordinanceoramendmentatthehearing.ThePlanning
CommissionfoundthattheproposedamendmentsproperlyreflectedtheCity’sintentfor
multiplefamilyresidentialdevelopmentandR-4districtlocations,andvotedto
recommendadoptionoftheamendmentstoboththeR-4districtandthehousingtextin
theComprehensivePlan.TheprimaryconsiderationoftheCommissionwaswhetherthe
ComprehensivePlanlanguageshouldbemorespecific;however,itwasnotedthatthe
zoningordinanceisbettersuitedtospecificity,withtheComprehensivePlanretaininga
moregeneralpolicyperspective.ThePlanningCommissiondidrequestamodificationto
theresolutionindictingthatthecriteriaareneitherall-inclusivenorexclusive.That
languageisincludedintheCouncil’sresolution.ThePlanningCommissiondidnot
recommendre-designationofanyspecificparcelsatthetime,althoughtherewas
discussionastowhethersuchanactionshouldbeconsidered.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2014-045amendingtheMonticelloComprehensive
Plan,Chapter3–LandUsetoincorporatefactorsandprinciplesintothecodeto
manageanddirectthelocationsforfuturehighdensityhousingareas,asstatedin
theresolution.
2.MotiontodenyResolution#2014-045atthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffsupportstheamendmentstobothzoningandComprehensivePlan.Itisbelieved
thatbothareappropriatetoreinforcetheCity’scommitmenttohighdensityhousingthat
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
4
willbeconsideredtobeapositiveadditiontothecommunity’shousingstock,orthe
highestqualityandwelllocatedtobesuccessfulwithoutcompromisingexisting
neighborhoodareas.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.Resolution#2014-045
B.PlanningCommissionResolution2014-036
C.JointCityCouncilandPlanningCommissionMinutes,November25,2013
D.MonticelloComprehensivePlan,LandUseMap
E.MonticelloComprehensivePlan,Chapter3,LandUse
F.OfficialMonticelloZoningMap
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-045
ADOPTINGANAMENDMENTTOTHEMONTICELLOCOMPREHENSIVEPLAN
CHAPTER3–LANDUSEBYINCORPORATINGLANGUAGEIDENTIFYING
FACTORSFORCONSIDERINGHIGHDENSITYRESIDENTIALLANDUSES
WHEREAS,theMonticelloComprehensivePlanidentifiesareasofthecommunityas“Placesto
Live”,indicatingappropriatelocationsforresidentialareas;and
WHEREAS,theComprehensivePlanprovidesforavarietyofpotentialresidentialdensities,but
doesnotdistinguishPlacestoLiveareasbydensity;and
WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionfindsthatfactorsforconsideringpotentialhigh-density
housinglocationswillassistintheCity’slandusedecisionsandplanning;and
WHEREAS,thehigh-densityzoningdistrictincorporatessuchfactors;and
WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingonApril1st,2014onthe
applicationandmembersofthepublicwereprovidedtheopportunitytopresentinformationto
thePlanningCommission;and
WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionhasconsideredallofthecommentsandthestaffreport,
whichareincorporatedbyreferenceintotheresolution;
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello
herebyadoptsthefindingsofthePlanningCommission,andamendstheComprehensivePlanto
incorporatetheunderlinedtextasfollows:
“Acompletehousingstockincludeshigherdensityresidentialareasthatconsistofmulti-
familyhousingtypessuchasapartmentsandcondominiums.Inthenearterm,the
ComprehensivePlandoesnotanticipateexpandingtheexistingsupplyofhigherdensity
housing.ItislikelythatMonticellowillneedadditionalhigherdensityhousingto:
Providehousingsuitedtotheneedsofanagingpopulation.
FacilitateredevelopmentintheDowntownorinotherappropriatelocationsofthe
community.
Providehousingneededtoattracttheworkforcerequiredtoachieveeconomic
developmentgoalsoftheCity
Higherdensityresidentiallandusesshouldbelocatedanddesignedtobecompatiblewith
nearbyresidentialormixeduses,onlotsabletoaccommodatelargerbuildingsandadded
trafficgeneration.Inaddition,sitingfactorsforhighdensityresidentialuseswill
prioritizeaccesstoservicesandamenitiesincludingpublicutilities,parks,trailsandopen
space,andcommercialand/ormedicalservices.Itwillbeimportant,whenconsidering
potentialdesignationofhighdensityhousingdevelopment,thattheparcelsmeetthe
specificstandardsofthezoningdistrict,andsuchdevelopmentcanbeaccommodatedin
accordancewiththepoliciesinthisPlan.”
Whilethesecommentsandthecommentsinthezoningordinanceareintendedtobe
instructivetheyarenotnecessarilytheonlyfactorsthatmightcomeintoplayonspecific
properties.
ADOPTEDBY theCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesotathis28thdayofApril,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
PLANNINGCOMMISSION
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-036
MotionBy:BurveeSecondedBy:Heidemann
AMENDMENTOFTHEMONTICELLOCOMPREHENSIVEPLANBY
INCORPORATINGLANGUAGEIDENTIFYINGFACTORSFORCONSIDERING
HIGHDENSITYRESIDENTIALLANDUSES
WHEREAS,theMonticelloComprehensivePlanidentifiesareasofthecommunityas
“PlacestoLive”,indicatingappropriatelocationsforresidentialareas;and
WHEREAS,theComprehensivePlanprovidesforavarietyofpotentialresidentialdensities,
butdoesnotdistinguishPlacestoLiveareasbydensity;and
WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionfindsthatfactorsforconsideringpotentialhigh-
densityhousinglocationswillassistintheCity’slandusedecisionsandplanning;and
WHEREAS,thehigh-densityzoningdistrictincorporatessuchfactors;and
WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingonApril1st,2014onthe
applicationandmembersofthepublicwereprovidedtheopportunitytopresentinformation
tothePlanningCommission;and
WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionhasconsideredallofthecommentsandthestaff
report,whichareincorporatedbyreferenceintotheresolution;
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thatthePlanningCommissionoftheCityof
Monticello,MinnesotarecommendsthattheComprehensivePlanbeamendedtoincorporate
thefollowinglanguage:
“Acompletehousingstockincludeshigherdensityresidentialareasthatconsistofmulti-family
housingtypessuchasapartmentsandcondominiums.Inthenearterm,theComprehensive
Plandoesnotanticipateexpandingtheexistingsupplyofhigherdensityhousing.Itislikelythat
Monticellowillneedadditionalhigherdensityhousingto:
Providehousingsuitedtotheneedsofanagingpopulation.
FacilitateredevelopmentintheDowntownorinotherappropriatelocationsofthe
community.
Providehousingneededtoattracttheworkforcerequiredtoachieveeconomic
developmentgoalsoftheCity
Higherdensityresidentiallandusesshouldbelocatedanddesignedtobecompatiblewith
nearbyresidentialormixeduses,onlotsabletoaccommodatelargerbuildingsandadded
trafficgeneration.Inaddition,sitingfactorsforhighdensityresidentialuseswillprioritize
accesstoservicesandamenitiesincludingpublicutilities,parks,trailsandopenspace,and
commercialand/ormedicalservices.Itwillbeimportant,whenconsideringpotential
designationofhighdensityhousingdevelopment,thattheparcelsmeetthespecific
standardsofthezoningdistrict,andsuchdevelopmentcanbeaccommodatedin
accordancewiththepoliciesinthisPlan.
Whilethesecommentsandthecommentsinthezoningordinanceareintendedtobe
instructivetheyarenotnecessarilytheonlyfactorsthatmightcomeintoplayonspecific
properties.
ADOPTED this1stdayofApril,2014,bythePlanningCommissionoftheCityof
Monticello,Minnesota.
MONTICELLOPLANNINGCOMMISSION
By:_______________________________
BradFyle,Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________________________
AngelaSchumann,CommunityDevelopmentDirector
£¤10 £¤10
Æÿ25
!(14
!(11
!(43
!(50
!(68
!(5!(81
§¨¦
94
Æÿ25
!(75
!(18
!(117
!(3 9
!(106
!(37!(1 3 1
0 0.5 10.25
Miles-
November 1, 2011Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright County, and WSB & Associates. Land Use Plan
Legend
Places to Live
Places to Shop
Places to Work
Places to Recreate
Places for Community
Downtown
Mixed Use
Interchange Planning Area
Urban Reserve
Infrastructure
Rivers and Streams
Public Waters Inventory
Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories)
Potential Greenway
Potential Interchange
Future Bridge
Existing Arterial or Collector Road
Proposed Arterial or Collector Road
Powerline
Monticello City Boundary
Orderly Annexation Area
Amended by City Council Resolution 2011-92, September 26, 2011
Land Use | 3-12008 Comprehensive Plan
3Land Use
The future vision for Monticello provides the foundation for the
Comprehensive Plan (the vision statement appears in Chapter 1). The
Land Use Plan, in turn, provides the framework for how land will be used
to help achieve the future vision for Monticello. The Land Use Plan seeks
to reinforce desirable land use patterns, identify places where change is
needed and guide the form and location of future growth.
The Land Use Plan for Monticello was shaped by a variety of factors,
including:
f Community input gathered through public workshops and Task Force
discussions.
f The existing built and natural environment in Monticello.
f The vision for Monticello’s future.
f Factors described in the Community Context chapter of the Plan.
f Systems plans for transportation, sanitary sewer and water supply.
This represents a departure in form from the 1996 Comprehensive Plan.
The 1996 Plan included the land use plan as part of a broader Development
Framework section. The 1996 Plan described Monticello’s land use
plan by general district of the community as a means of attending to the
unique issues in each district. The 2008 Update of the Comprehensive
Plan establishes a separate land use chapter consisting of the following
components:
f A section on Future Growth describes the implications of future
resident growth and the amount of growth anticipated by the Plan.
f The Land Use Plan Map (see Figure 3-2) shows the land uses assigned
to each parcel of land.
f Land Use Categories further explain the Land Use Plan by describing
the land uses depicted in the Map. This section includes land use
policies describe the objectives that Monticello seeks to achieve
through the implementation of the Land Use Plan and the supporting
elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
f Focus Areas provide a more detailed discussion of characteristics,
goals and policies for key areas of the community.
Chapter Contents
Future Growth ............................3-2
Growth Policies ........................3-2
Land Use Plan Map ....................3-3
Land Use Categories .................3-3
Places to Live .............................3-5
Places to Work .......................3-10
Places to Shop ........................3-13
Downtown ..............................3-13
Mixed Use ...............................3-15
Places to Recreate .................3-15
Places for Community ..........3-15
Urban Reserve .......................3-16
Interchange Planning Area .3-16
Private Infrastructure ...........3-16
Greenway ...............................3-16
Focus Areas ..............................3-17
Northwest Monticello ..........3-17
Downtown Focus Area ........3-19
South Central Focus Area ...3-22
East Focus Area .....................3-23
The Embracing Downtown Plan
was adopted by City Council
resolution 2012-011 on January 9,
2012 and is incorporated herein as
an appendix of the Comprehensive
Plan.
3-2 | Land Use City of Monticello
Future Growth
In looking to the future, Monticello must not just
consider the qualities of the future community, but also
the nature of growth. Assumptions about the amount
and pace of future growth are important parts of the
foundation for the Comprehensive Plan. Growth has
several important implications for the Comprehensive
Plan:
f Growth projections are used to plan for the capacity
of municipal utility systems.
f Growth projections are used to create and manage
finance plans for capital improvements.
f The school system uses growth projections to
forecast enrollments and to plan for programs and
facilities.
f Market studies use growth projections to analyze
the potential for locating or expanding businesses
in Monticello.
f The characteristics of growth influence the amount
of land needed to support this development.
f Growth adds trips to the local street system.
f Assumptions about growth influence the
policies and actions needed to implement the
Comprehensive Plan.
For these reasons, it is essential that the Comprehensive
Plan state assumptions of the nature of future growth. A
challenge in forecasting future residential development
is that the Comprehensive Plan influences, but does not
control, the factors that determine where people live.
These factors include:
f Quality of life.
f Access to employment.
f Availability of desired housing and neighborhood
options.
f Affordability.
f Competition from other places in the region.
Given these uncertainties, the Comprehensive Plan
seeks a balance between optimism and prudence.
For many reasons, the Plan should not significantly
understate the growth potential of Monticello. The
balancing force lies with the implications of assuming
more growth than is reasonable. The chart in Figure
3-1 shows the projection of future residential growth
assumed in the Comprehensive Plan.
The projections assumes that the rate of growth slowly
rises over the next five years and continues at a level
of 150 units per year from 2012 to 2020. This amount
falls below the 229 units/year average for 2001 through
2005. This rate of growth is intended to reflect several
factors. Monticello will remain a desirable place to
live, attracting both builders and residents. Housing
market conditions will improve from the weaknesses
experienced in 2006 and 2007. A combination
of market conditions, local policy objectives, and
changing demographics may reduce the potential for
achieving and sustaining higher rates of residential
growth. Slower future growth reflects the belief that
achieving the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, in
particular seeking more move up housing, will result
in less development than in previous years.
Growth Policies
1. The City will consistently review recent development
trends and update growth projections to serve as a
basis for public and private planning.
2. Over the life of this Comprehensive Plan, growth
will occur within the boundaries of the current
municipal boundaries and the Orderly Annexation
Area.
3. Future development should be guided to locations
that utilize existing infrastructure and locations
242
223
208
229
256
30 30
50
70
90
110
130
150150150150150150150167
77
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
Actual
Projected
Figure 3-1: Growth Trends and Projections
Land Use | 3-32008 Comprehensive Plan ~ Updated 2013
that facilitate the construction of street and
utility systems that meet the objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. The Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate
action by Monticello to annex or extend utility
systems to property immediately north of the
Mississippi River. Development in this area will
place additional traffic on STH 25 (particularly
in the Downtown area) and channel investment
away from other parts of the City, especially the
Downtown.
Land Use Plan Map
The Land Use Plan Map (shown in Figure 3-2) shows the
desired land use for all property in Monticello and the
Orderly Annexation Area The land use plan depicted
in this map builds on the previous community planning
in Monticello.
The Comprehensive Plan uses the Land Use Plan to
define the broad land use patterns in Monticello. The
Land Use Plan seeks to:
f Organize the community in a sustainable
manner.
f Make efficient use of municipal utility systems
and facilitate the orderly and financially feasible
expansion of these systems.
f Provide the capacity for the type of growth desired
by the community.
The Land Use Plan Map is only one piece of the land
use plan for Monticello. The other parts of the Land
Use chapter of the Comprehensive Plan work with this
map to explain the intent and objectives for future land
use. Further, this map lays the foundation for land use
controls that are used by the City to implement the
Comprehensive Plan.
Land Use Categories
The Land Use Plan Map uses a set of specific categories
to guide land use in Monticello. One element missing
from the 1996 Comprehensive Plan was a description
of the land use categories shown in the Land Use
Plan. The ability to use the Comprehensive Plan as
an effective land use management tool requires a
definition of each land use. These definitions provide
a common understanding of the basic characteristics
of each category used in the Land Use Plan.
The 1996 Plan relies on three basic categories of private
land use: residential, commercial and industrial.
Each of these categories is further divided into
subcategories that distinguish between the character,
type and intensity of development desired in different
locations.
The 2008 update of the Comprehensive Plan uses a
different approach to achieve similar land use patterns.
The Land Use Plan map depicts series of “places” for
private development: Places to Live, Places to Shop,
Places to Work, and Downtown. This approach is based
on the following rationale:
f These broad categories more clearly illustrate the
pattern of development and the plan for future
growth.
f Although residential land uses vary by type and
density, they share many public objectives.
f This approach makes a more enduring
comprehensive plan. The Plan can guide an area
for the appropriate land use without the need
to predict future community needs and market
forces.
f The Plan relies on policies, land use regulations,
performance standards and public actions to
provide a more detailed guide for land use and
development. This approach conveys more
flexibility and control to the City Council and the
Planning Commission.
Role of Zoning Regulations
Zoning regulations play a critical role in implementing land use plans in
Monticello. State Law gives zoning regulations priority over the Comprehensive
Plan. If land uses are different, zoning regulations control the use of land.
Zoning regulations are particularly important in the application of the land
use categories in the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. The “places to” land
use categories set forth a broad and flexible land use pattern for Monticello.
Zoning regulations (and other land use controls) will be used to determine the
appropriate location for each form of development and other regulations on
the use of land, consistent with policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
3-4 | Land Use City of Monticello
Figure 3-2: Land Use Plan Map
£¤10
£¤10
Æÿ2
5
!(14
!(11
!(43
!(50
!(68
!(5
!(81
§¨¦94
Æÿ25
!(75
!(18
!(117
!(39
!(106
!(37
!(
1
3
1
0
0.5
1
0.25
Miles
-
November 1, 2011
Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright
County, and WSB & Associates.
Land Use Plan
Legend
Places to Live
Places to Shop
Places to Work
Places to Recreate
Places for Community
Downtown
Mixed Use
Interchange Planning Area
Urban Reserve
Infrastructure
Rivers and Streams
Public Waters Inventory
Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories)
Potential Greenway
Potential Interchange
Future Bridge
Existing Arterial or Collector Road
Proposed Arterial or Collector Road
Powerline
Monticello City Boundary
Orderly Annexation Area
Amended by City Council Resolution 2011-92, September 26, 2011
£¤10
£¤10
Æÿ2
5
!(14
!(11
!(43
!(50
!(68
!(5
!(81
§¨¦94
Æÿ25
!(75
!(18
!(117
!(39
!(106
!(37
!(
1
3
1
0
0.5
1
0.25
Miles
-
November 1, 2011
Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright
County, and WSB & Associates.
Land Use Plan
Legend
Places to Live
Places to Shop
Places to Work
Places to Recreate
Places for Community
Downtown
Mixed Use
Interchange Planning Area
Urban Reserve
Infrastructure
Rivers and Streams
Public Waters Inventory
Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories)
Potential Greenway
Potential Interchange
Future Bridge
Existing Arterial or Collector Road
Proposed Arterial or Collector Road
Powerline
Monticello City Boundary
Orderly Annexation Area
Amended by City Council Resolution 2011-92, September 26, 2011
£¤10
£¤10
Æÿ2
5
!(14
!(11
!(43
!(50
!(68
!(5
!(81
§¨¦94
Æÿ25
!(75
!(18
!(117
!(39
!(106
!(37
!(
1
3
1
0
0.5
1
0.25
Miles
-
November 1, 2011
Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright
County, and WSB & Associates.
Land Use Plan
Legend
Places to Live
Places to Shop
Places to Work
Places to Recreate
Places for Community
Downtown
Mixed Use
Interchange Planning Area
Urban Reserve
Infrastructure
Rivers and Stream
s
Public Waters Inventory
Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories)
Potential Greenway
Potential Interchange
Future Bridge
Existing Arterial or Collector Road
Proposed Arterial or Collector Road
Powerline
Monticello City Boundary
Orderly A
nnexation Area
Amended by City Council Resolution 2011-92, September 26, 2011
Land Use | 3-52008 Comprehensive Plan ~ Updated 2013
The remainder of this section describes the categories
used in the Comprehensive Plan in greater detail.
Places to Live
The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create and sustain
quality places for people to live in Monticello (see Figure
3-3). This category designates areas where housing is
the primary use of land. The emphasis behind Places to
Live is to help ensure that Monticello offers a full range
of housing choices, while preserving and enhancing the
quality of neighborhoods. Although a single land use
category, Places to Live does not suggest housing is a
homogenous commodity or that any type of housing is
desirable or allowed in any location.
When someone says “house” the most common image
is a single family detached dwelling. This housing style
is characterized by several features. There is a one-to-
one relationship between house and parcel of land - the
housing unit is located on a single parcel. The house is
not physically attached to another housing unit. The
housing is designed for occupancy by a single family
unit. The typical neighborhood in Monticello is made
up exclusively of single family detached homes.
The primary variables become the design of the
subdivision, the size of the lot and the size and style of
the dwelling. Many older neighborhoods in Monticello
(north of Interstate 94) were built on a traditional grid
street system. Over the past thirty years, development
patterns have moved to a new suburban curvilinear
Figure 3-3: Land Use Plan - Places to Live
3-6 | Land Use City of Monticello
pattern, characterized by curvilinear street layout with
the use of cul-de-sacs.
A variety of factors, including consumer preference
and housing cost, have increased the construction
of attached housing in recent years. Duplexes, twin
homes, quads and townhomes are common examples
of this housing style. Although the specific form
changes, there are several common characteristics.
Each housing unit is designed for occupancy by a single
family. The housing units are physically attached to
each other in a horizontal orientation.
Places to Live will include some neighborhoods
designed to offer a mixture of housing types and
densities. Mixed residential neighborhoods create a
pattern that combines single-family detached housing
with a mixture of attached housing types. Using
good design and planning, these mixed residential
neighborhoods can achieve a higher density without
compromising the overall integrity of the low-density
residential pattern.
This integration strengthens neighborhoods by
increasing housing choice and affordability beyond what
is possible by today’s rules and regulations. It also avoids
large and separate concentrations of attached housing.
It enhances opportunities to organize development in
a manner that preserves natural features.
A complete housing stock includes higher density
residential areas that consist of multi-family housing
types such as apartments and condominiums. In the
near term, the Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate
expanding the existing supply of higher density housing.
It is likely that Monticello will need additional higher
density housing to:
f Provide housing suited to the needs of an aging
population.
f Facilitate redevelopment in the Downtown or in
other appropriate locations of the community.
f Provide housing needed to attract the work force
required to achieve economic development goals
of the City.
Higher density residential land uses should be located
where the setting can accommodate the taller buildings
and additional traffic.
Policies – Places to Live
The Comprehensive Plan seeks to achieve the following
objectives for residential land use in Monticello:
1. Provide a range of housing choices that fit all stages
of a person’s life-cycle (see below).
2. Support development in areas that best matches the
overall objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Develop quality neighborhoods that create a
sense of connection to the community and inspire
sustained investment. The Comprehensive
Plan seeks to maintain the quality and integrity
of existing neighborhoods by encouraging the
maintenance of property and reinvestment into
the existing housing stock. Changes in housing
type should be allowed only to facilitate necessary
redevelopment.
4. Create neighborhoods that allow residents to
maintain a connection to the natural environment
and open spaces.
5. Seek quality over quantity in residential growth.
Achieving the objectives for quality housing and
neighborhoods may reduce the overall rate of
growth.
6. Reserve areas with high amenities for “move up”
housing as desired in the vision statement. These
amenities may include forested areas, wetland
complexes, adjacency to parks and greenways.
Some of the City’s policy objectives require further
explanation.
Life Cycle Housing
Housing is not a simple “one size fits all” commodity.
Monticello’s housing stock varies by type, age, style
and price. The Community Context chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan describes the characteristics of
the housing stock based on the 2000 Census and recent
building permit trends.
The concept of life cycle housing recognizes that
housing needs change over the course of a person’s
life (see Figure 3-4). Young adults may not have the
Land Use | 3-72008 Comprehensive Plan ~ Updated 2013
income capacity to own the typical single family
home. This segment of the population often seeks
rental housing. Families move through different sizes,
styles and prices of housing as family size and income
changes over time. With aging, people may desire
smaller homes with less maintenance. Eventually, the
elderly transition to housing associated with options
for direct care. As noted in the Vision Statement,
Monticello’s population will continue to become more
diverse. This diversity will be seen in age, race, culture
and wealth. These factors will influence the housing
needs of Monticello.
The Comprehensive Plan recognizes these differences
and seeks to create a balanced housing supply that
encourages people to move to and stay in Monticello.
This balance may not be achieved solely by market
forces guided by this Land Use Plan. Actions by the
City may be needed to promote the creation of housing
in underserved segments of the market.
Neighborhood Design
A priority for the community is diversification of the
housing stock by providing more “move up” housing.
In this context, the term “move up” housing refers to
larger homes with more amenities in structure and
setting. This type of housing may not be exclusively
single-family detached or low density. Attached forms
of housing with medium or high densities may meet
the objectives for move up housing in the appropriate
locations. In this way, the objectives for move up
housing and life cycle housing are compatible and
supportive.
While every community wants a high quality housing
stock, this issue has particular importance in Monticello.
It is a key to retaining population. Without a broader
variety of housing options, families may encouraged to
leave Monticello to meet their need for a larger home.
It is a factor in economic development. One facet of
attracting and retaining professional jobs is to provide
desirable housing alternatives.
It must be recognized that creating move up housing
requires more than policies in the Comprehensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan provides a guide for achieving
the desired results. The desired outcomes require
Figure 3-4: Life Cycle of Housing Supply
3-8 | Land Use City of Monticello
private investment. This investment occurs when
demand exists or the City can provide an incentive to
attract investment.
Part of attracting move up housing comes from
creating great neighborhoods – places that will attract
and sustain the housing options sought by the City.
Neighborhoods are the building block of Places to Live
in Monticello. The goal of the Comprehensive Plan is
to create and maintain attractive, safe and functional
neighborhoods. The following policies help to achieve
this objective:
1. Neighborhoods should incorporate the natural
characteristics of the setting. Trees, terrain,
drainageways, and other natural features provide
character to neighborhoods.
2. Housing should be oriented to the local street,
minimizing access and noise conflicts with collector
streets.
3. The City will use public improvements to enhance
the appearance and character of a neighborhood.
Some examples of improvements that define an
area include streets with curb and gutter, trees in
the public boulevard, street lighting systems, and
storm water ponding.
4. Sidewalks, trails, and bikeways will connect the
neighborhood to other parts of the community.
5. Every neighborhood should have reasonable access
to a public park as a place for residents to gather
and play.
All of these elements work together to create a desirable
and sustainable place to live.
Balancing the Built and Natural Environments
The natural amenities of the growth areas (west and
south) in Monticello should serve as a catalyst for
residential development. The Bertram Chain of Lakes
Regional Park offers the dual assets of natural features
and recreational opportunities. Lakes, wetlands and
other natural amenities exist throughout the orderly
annexation area.
Studies have shown that parks and open space have a
positive economic effect on adjacent development. An
article published by the National Park and Recreation
Association states that “recent analyses suggest that
open spaces may have substantial positive impacts
on surrounding property values and hence, the
property tax base, providing open space advocates
with convincing arguments in favor of open space
designation and preservation.” Balancing the built and
natural environments should provide a catalyst to the
types of development desired by the City and in the
expansion of the property tax base.
In attempting to meet residential development
objectives, the City should not lose sight of long-term
public benefit from access to these same natural areas.
The original development of Monticello provides an
excellent illustration. The majority of the riverfront
in Monticello is controlled by private property. Public
Figure 3-5: Relationship Between Development and
Natural Features - Parkway
Figure 3-6: Relationship Between Development and
Natural Features - Trail Corridor
Land Use | 3-92008 Comprehensive Plan ~ Updated 2013
access to the River comes at points provided by public
parks.
A well known example of balancing public use with
private development is the Minneapolis chain of lakes
and Minnehaha Creek. Public streets (parkways)
and trails separate neighborhoods from the natural
features, preserving public use and access. These
neighborhoods are some of the most desirable in the
region, demonstrating that public use and private
benefit are not mutually exclusive.
The figures on the previous page show two options for
integrating housing, natural features and public use.
Figure 3-5 is the parkway concept. An attractive street
forms the edge between the park (or natural area) and
the housing. A multi-use trail follows the street while
homes face the street and draw on the attractiveness of
both the parkway and the natural amenities.
The alternative is to use a trail corridor to provide public
access to these areas (see Figure 3-6). The trail follows
the edge of the natural area. Access to the trail between
lots should come at reasonable intervals.
There are a variety of real world examples of how
Minnesota cities have used conservation design
strategies to promote high quality development and
preserve the natural environment. The illustrations in
Figure 3-7 shows elements of the Chevalle development
in Chaska. Using open space design and rural
residential cluster development techniques, HKGi’s
concept plan provides for a variety of housing options
while preserving a majority of the area as permanent
open space, including public and common open
spaces. Amenities would include access to protected
open spaces (lakeshore, woods, meadows, pastures,
wetlands), walking/biking trails, equestrian trails
and facilities, common outdoor structures and an
environmental learning center. The experience of other
Figure 3-7: Example of Conservation Design Development
OPEN SPACE DESIGN
-Pastures
-Equestrian Facility
-Wetlands Enhancements
-Conservation Easements
-Central Park
-27 Acre Park South of Lake
NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD
Total Housing Units:66
Custom, Luxury Twin Homes
Lot Width:45’x 90’Twinhome
Lot Size:4,050 Sq. Ft.
House Sq. Ft.:2,800 to 3,800 Sq. Ft.
Price Point Packages:$475,000 to
$750,000
NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD
Total Housing Units:98
Semi-Custom, Single-Family Homes
Lot Width:82’Minimum
Lot Size:9,900 to 16,000 Sq. Ft.
House Sq. Ft.:2,400 to 4,800 Sq. Ft.
Price Point Packages:$450,000 to
$650,000
NEIGHBORHOOD FEATURES
-Central Park
-Northeast Neighborhood Green
-South Neighborhood Green
-Association Dock and Park
3-10 | Land Use City of Monticello
cities and developments can guide future planning and
decision making in Monticello.
Attractive Places
Attractive physical appearance is one of the most
common attributes of Places to Live in Monticello.
Attractiveness is a combination of design, construction
and maintenance. These characteristics apply to
buildings and sites. Attractiveness is relevant for both
private and public property. Attractiveness reflects
individual pride in property as well as an overall sense
of community quality.
The City may use a variety of regulatory tools to
influence the potential for attractive neighborhoods:
f Building codes and additional regulations to
promote quality construction.
f Subdivision regulations control the initial
configuration of lots.
f Zoning regulations establish limitations on the size
of lots, placement of the house on a lot, relationship
of structure size to lot area, and building height.
f Nuisance ordinances enable the City to prevent and
correct undesirable uses of property.
f Other City regulations control other ancillary uses
of residential property.
Maintenance of property is a factor in sustaining
quality neighborhoods. The tenure (form of ownership)
influences the responsibility for housing maintenance.
The owner-occupant of a single family detached home
is solely responsible for the maintenance of building
and grounds. If this same home is rented, maintenance
responsibilities are often shared between tenant and
owner. This relationship may include a third party
property manager retained by the owner to perform
maintenance duties. Owners of attached housing may
act collectively through a homeowner’s association.
In multiple family rental housing, the tenants have no
direct responsibility for property maintenance. This
discussion does not imply a preference, but is intended
solely to highlight the differences. This understanding
becomes relevant when public action is needed to
address a failure of the private maintenance approach.
Nuisance ordinances are one tool used by the City
to address failures in private maintenance and use of
property.
Economics also influences property maintenance. The
greater the portion of income devoted to basic housing
costs (mortgage/rent, taxes, utilities), the less money
available for maintenance activities. Maintenance
can be deferred, but not avoided. If left unchecked,
this cycle of avoided maintenance produces negative
effects.
Safe Places
Safety is frequently identified as the most desired
characteristic of Places to Live. Several aspects of the
Comprehensive Plan and city government influence
safe neighborhoods.
1. The City will encourage existing neighborhoods
and develop new neighborhoods where people
are involved in the community, interact with their
neighbors and support each other.
2. The City will design, build and maintain a system
of streets that collects traffic from neighborhoods,
allows movement within Monticello to jobs,
shopping and other destinations and minimizes
traffic that “cuts through” neighborhoods on local
streets seeking other destinations.
3. The City will provide, directly or by contract,
services needed to protect people and property.
4. The City will support the Land Use Plan with a
water supply that provides clean water at pressures
needed to support fire suppression.
5. The City will protect the natural environment
by requiring new development to connect to the
sanitary sewer system and by adequately treating
all municipal wastewater.
6. The City will provide water that is safe to drink by
protecting water supply sources.
Places to Work
This land use is primarily intended for industrial
development. Places to Work seeks to provide
locations for the retention, expansion and creation of
businesses that provide jobs for Monticello residents
and expansion and diversification of the property tax
base. In order to be a center of employment with a wide
Land Use | 3-112008 Comprehensive Plan ~ Updated 2013
range of job opportunities, it is critical that Monticello
preserve sufficient land for Places to Work over the
next twenty-five years. These land uses can be one of
the most challenging to locate because of its need for
convenient transportation access and influence on
surrounding land uses. In planning for future Places to
Work, the Comprehensive Plan considers the goals of
the community; what type of industrial development
is sought; and what factors should be considered when
locating an industrial land use.
In planning for sustaining existing businesses and
attracting new development, it is necessary to
understand why Places to Work are important to
Monticello. The objectives for this land use include:
f Expanding and diversifying the property tax base.
f Providing jobs with an increasing opportunity for
people to work and live in Monticello.
f Promoting wage levels that provide incomes
needed to purchase decent housing, support
local businesses and support local government
services.
f Take advantage of opportunities to attract
companies that have a synergy with existing
companies in the community, including suppliers,
customers and collaborative partners.
f Encouraging the retention and expansion of
existing businesses in Monticello.
Figure 3-8: Land Use Plan - Places to Work
£¤10 £¤10
Æÿ25
!(14
!(11
!(43
!(50
!(68
!(5!(81
§¨¦
9
4
Æÿ25
!(75
!(18
!(117
!(39
!(106
!(37!(1 3 1
0 0.5 10.25
Miles-
November 1, 2011
Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright
County, and WSB & Associates. Land Use Plan
Legend
Public Waters Inventory
Rivers and Streams
Potential Interchange
Potential Bridge
Powerline
Monticello City Boundary
Orderly Annexation Area
Jobs
Amended by City Council Resolution 2011-92, September 26, 2011
3-12 | Land Use City of Monticello
Policies – Places to Work
1. The City will use the Comprehensive Plan to
designate and preserve a supply of land for Places
to Work that meets current and future needs.
2. Consistent with the vision for the future of
Monticello, the Land Use Plan promotes the
establishment of business campus settings that
provide a high level of amenities, including
architectural controls, landscaping, preservation of
natural features, storage enclosed within buildings,
and other features. The zoning ordinance,
subdivision regulations and other land use controls
will also be used to create and maintain the desired
business campus settings.
3. Places to Work supports the City’s desire to attract
businesses that complement existing businesses
or benefit from the community’s infrastructure,
including power and telecommunications.
4. The Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that
Places to Work should provide locations for
other general industrial development in the areas
of manufacturing, processing, warehousing,
distribution and related businesses.
5. Places to Work may include non-industrial
businesses that provide necessary support to the
underlying development objectives of this land use.
Examples of supporting land uses include lodging,
office supplies and repair services.
Additional public objectives and strategies for Places
to Work can be found in the Economic Development
chapter.
Figure 3-9: Land Use Plan - Places to Shop
£¤10 £¤10
Æÿ25
!(14
!(11
!(43
!(50
!(68
!(5!(81
§¨¦
94
Æÿ25
!(75
!(18
!(117
!(39
!(106
!(37!(1 3 1
0 0.5 10.25
Miles-
November 1, 2011
Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright
County, and WSB & Associates. Land Use Plan
Legend
Public Waters Inventory
Rivers and Streams
Potential Interchange
Potential Bridge
Powerline
Monticello City Boundary
Orderly Annexation Area
Commerce
Amended by City Council Resolution 2011-92, September 26, 2011
Land Use | 3-132008 Comprehensive Plan ~ Updated 2013
Places to Shop
Places to Shop designate locations that are or can be
developed with businesses involved with the sale of
goods and services. Places to Shop may include offices
for service businesses. Places to Shop guides land uses
that are both local and regional in nature.
Policies - Places to Shop
In guiding land uses for Places to Shop, the
Comprehensive Plan seeks to:
1. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to attract and retain
businesses that provide goods and services needed
by Monticello residents.
2. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to capture the
opportunity for commercial development that
serves a broader region. Places to Shop with a
regional orientation should be located where
the traffic does not disadvantage travel within
Monticello.
3. Commercial development will be used to expand
and diversify the local property tax base and as an
element of a diverse supply of local jobs.
4. Places to Shop will be located on property with
access to the street capacity needed to support
traffic from these businesses.
5. Each parcel should supply an adequate supply of
parking that makes it convenient to obtain the
goods and services.
6. Building materials, facades and signage should
combine with public improvements to create an
attractive setting.
7. Site design must give consideration to defining edges
and providing buffering or separation between the
commercial parcel and adjacent residential uses.
These policies help to create sustainable locations for
Places to Shop in a manner that enhances Monticello.
Downtown
The Embracing Downtown Plan was adopted by City
Council resolution 2012-011 on January 9, 2012
and is herein incorporated as an appendix of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Downtown is a unique commercial district that is part
of Monticello’s heritage and identity. It is, however,
no longer possible for Downtown to be Monticello’s
central business district. The mass of current and
future commercial development south of Interstate 94
along TH 25 and in east Monticello along interstate 94
have replaced the downtown area as primary shopping
districts. The future success of downtown requires it
to be a place unlike any other in Monticello.
The Comprehensive Plan seeks to achieve the Vision,
Guiding Principles and Goals described in the
Embracing Downtown Plan. Downtown is intended to
be a mix of inter-related and mutually supportive land
uses. Businesses involved with the sale of goods and
services should be the focus of Downtown land use.
Residential development facilitates reinvestment and
places potential customers in the Downtown area. Civic
uses draw in people from across the community.
During the planning process, the potential for
allowing commercial activity to extend easterly out of
the Downtown along Broadway was discussed. The
Comprehensive Plan consciously defines Cedar Street
as the eastern edge of Downtown for two basic reasons:
(1) Downtown should be successful and sustainable
before new areas of competition are created; and
(2) The Comprehensive Plan seeks to maintain and
enhance the integrity of residential neighborhoods
east of Downtown.
More than any other land use category, Downtown has
strong connections to other parts of the Comprehensive
The Comprehensive Plan describes issues, plans and policies related to the Downtown in several sections
of the Plan.
3-14 | Land Use City of Monticello
Plan. Therefore the City has adopted the Embracing
Downtown Plan as its guiding planning document
for the Downtown. The following parts of the
Comprehensive Plan also address community desires
and plans for the Downtown area:
f The Land Use chapter contains a specific focus
area on Downtown. The focus area contains a
more detailed discussion of the issues facing the
Downtown and potential public actions needed to
address these issues.
f The operation of the street system is a critical
factor for the future of Downtown. The
Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
and the Transportation chapter of the Embracing
Downtown Plan influence the ability of residents to
travel to Downtown and the options for mitigating
the impacts of traffic on Highway 25 and other
Downtown streets.
f The Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
provides for parks in the Downtown and the trail
systems that allow people to reach Downtown on
foot or bicycle.
f The Economic Development chapter of
the Comprehensive Plan and the Financial
Implementation chapter of the Embracing
Downtown Plan lay the foundation for public
actions and investments that will be needed to
achieve the desired outcomes.
Policies/Guiding Principles – Downtown
1. Downtown is a special and unique part of
Monticello. It merits particular attention in the
Comprehensive Plan and in future efforts to achieve
community plans and objectives.
2. Downtown is intended to be an inter-connected
and supportive collection of land uses. The primary
function of Downtown is as a commercial district.
Other land uses should support and enhance the
overall objectives for Downtown.
3. The City will build on core assets of greater
Downtown Monticello as identified in the
Embracing Downtown Plan.
4. A shared vision among property owners, business
owners and the City is the foundation for effective
team work and long term success.
5. A shared understanding of realistic market potential
is the foundation for design and generation of a
healthy business mix.
6. A safe, attractive human scale environment and
entrepreneurial businesses that actively emphasize
personal customer service will differentiate
Downtown from other shopping districts.
7. Property values can be enhanced if property
owners and the City share a vision for Downtown
and actively seek to cultivate a safe, appealing
environment and attractive business mix.
8. Housing in the Downtown can facilitate necessary
redevelopment and bring potential customers
directly into the area. Housing may be free-
standing or in shared buildings with street level
commercial uses.
9. Downtown is the civic center of Monticello. To
the degree possible, unique public facilities (such
as the Community Center, the Library and the Post
Office) should be located in the Downtown area as
a means to bring people into the Downtown.
10. Downtown should emphasize connections with
the Mississippi River that are accessible by the
public.
11. Downtown should be a pedestrian-oriented place
in a manner that cannot be matched by other
commercial districts.
12. Downtown should have an adequate supply of free
parking for customers distributed throughout the
area.
13. The City and business community must work
actively with MnDOT to ensure safe local access
to business districts.
All of these policies work together to attract people to
Downtown and to enhance the potential for a successful
business environment.
Amendment to Comprehensive Plan/1997 Downtown
Revitalization Plan
Resolution 2010-049, adopted 7/12/10:
At the intersection of Broadway and Pine Streets,
parking lots may be constructed only when all of the
following conditions exist:
Land Use | 3-152008 Comprehensive Plan ~ Updated 2013
f Applicable traffic safety and access requirements
limit the ability to comply with building location
standards of this Plan.
f At least fifty (50) percent of either the Broadway
or Pine Street frontage is occupied by a building
(non-parking area).
f An alternative vertical element is located at the
street corner. This element must be determined
by City Officials to establish an architecturally
compatible corner presence. Such elements
may include, but not be limited to public art,
interpretive signage, architectural business signs,
and architecturally appropriate lighting.
Mixed Use
The Mixed Use is a transition area between the
Downtown and the hospital campus. It has been
created in recognition of the unique nature of this area.
The area serves two functions. It is the edge between
long-term residential neighborhoods and a major
transportation corridor (Broadway Street). It is also a
link between the Downtown, the hospital campus and
the east interchange retail area.
The primary goal of this land use is to preserve and
enhance housing in this part of Monticello. Any
non-residential development should be designed to
minimize the impacts on and conflicts with adjacent
neighborhoods.
Policies - Mixed Use
1. Development should not have direct access to
Broadway street. Access should come from side
street.
2. Non-residential development should be limited to
small retail, service and office businesses. The scale,
character and site design should be compatible with
the adjacent residential neighborhoods.
3. All non-residential development will be oriented
to Broadway Street and not to 3rd Street or River
Street.
4. Commercial development compatible with the
Downtown should be encouraged to locate there.
5. More intense housing and commercial uses may be
allowed if directly related to the hospital.
Places to Recreate
Places to Recreate consist of public parks and private
recreation facilities. The land uses are essential
elements of the quality of life in Monticello. The Parks
and Trails chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes
the current park and trail system and the future plan
to maintain and enhance this system.
The Comprehensive Plan is only one aspect of managing
the land use for public parks and private recreation
facilities. The City’s zoning regulations place these
locations into a zoning district. Often, the purpose
of the zoning district is to guide private development,
such as housing. Under current State Law, zoning
regulations “trump” the Land Use Plan and govern the
use of land. With the potential for the redevelopment
of golf courses, it is important the Comprehensive Plan
and other land use controls work in concert to achieve
the desired outcomes.
The City’s plans and policies for parks, trails and
open space can be found in the Parks chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan
Places for Community
Places for Community consist of public and semi-
public land uses. Public uses include all governmental
facilities (city, county, state and federal) and schools.
This category also applies to churches, cemeteries,
hospitals, and other institutional uses.
It is important to note that these land uses relate only
to existing land uses. The Comprehensive Plan does
not guide the location of new churches, schools, public
buildings and other institutional land uses. Places for
Community will be needed in the Northwest area as
it develops.
These uses are typically allowed in residential areas and
governed by zoning regulations. These institutional
uses (such as schools and churches) are important parts
of the fabric of the community, but require guidance
to ensure a proper fit with its residential surroundings.
New institutional use should be allowed in residential
areas under certain conditions. These conditions
should address the aspects of the use that conflict with
3-16 | Land Use City of Monticello
desired characteristics of residential neighborhood.
Criteria for locating an institutional use in a residential
land use area include:
1. Size. Large buildings and site areas can disrupt
neighborhood cohesiveness. Use in lower density
residential areas should not be more than [to be
determined] square feet in lot area.
2. Parking. Parking may spill on to neighborhood
streets without adequate on-site facilities. The
parking needs will vary with the use of the facility.
Each facility should provide adequate on-site or
reasonable off-site shared parking based on the use
of the facility.
3. Traffic. Institutional uses should be oriented to
designated collector or arterial streets.
4. Lighting and signage. Site lighting and signage
needs may resemble commercial uses. These site
factors should be managed to fit the character of
the surrounding residential development.
Urban Reserve
The Urban Reserve contains all property in the Orderly
Annexation Area that it not shown for development
in the near term in this Plan. The objective is to
encourage rural and agricultural uses, preventing
barriers to future development opportunities. It is
anticipated that the City will grow into portions of the
Urban Reserve as planned land use areas become fully
developed and capacity for future growth in needed.
The Urban Reserve is not simply a holding area for
future development. Parts of the Urban Reserve are
likely to be preserved as natural resource areas or for
agricultural purposes. Future planning will consider
the locations in the Urban Reserve best suited for
development.
Interchange Planning Area
The Interchange Planning Area encompasses
undeveloped land in the northwest part of Monticello
around the site of a potential west interchange with
Interstate 94. The purpose of this land use is to
preserve the area for future development and prevent
the creation of development barriers.
If built, the area should be planned to support a mixture
of commercial, employment and residential land uses.
The interchange location and the routes of future
connecting roads are solely for illustration. Future land
use issues in this area are discussed in the Focus Area
for Northwest Monticello.
Private Infrastructure
This category applies to Xcel Energy’s power plant and
railroad right-of-way. This category recognizes the
unique role of the power plant in Monticello.
Greenway
The Land Use Plan Map shows a “potential greenway”
ringing the western and southern edges of Monticello.
The Greenway is intended to provide an environmental
corridor that connects large community parks and open
spaces to neighborhoods, schools, shopping areas and
places to work. They serve to protect environmentally
sensitive areas such as natural habitat, wetlands,
tree canopy, and drainage ways. Land within this
corridor could be comprised of a combination of
public and private open space. Development would
not be prohibited within the greenway but would be
reasonably restricted to ensure that development is
carefully integrated with the natural environment.
The Greenway is intended to shape development
patterns in a manner that is sensitive to the existing
environment and harmonious with the landscape. The
Greenway creates opportunities for a continuous trail
corridor connecting neighborhoods with large parks
and open spaces. A trail within this corridor is intended
to be fully accessible to the general public.
The following are the City’s goals for the Greenway:
1. To provide (where possible) a continuous green
corridor connecting large community parks and
open spaces to neighborhoods, shopping areas,
schools and places to work.
2. To connect people to significant places.
3. To protect the community’s natural resources
(trees, ponds, wetlands, slopes, etc).
4. To create environmentally sensitive development
and design.
Land Use | 3-172008 Comprehensive Plan ~ Updated 2013
5. To provide opportunities for corridors for wildlife
movement and ecological connections between
natural areas.
Focus Areas
For certain parts of Monticello, the intentions of the
Comprehensive Plan cannot be adequately described
solely with the land use map and the related category
descriptions. The following Focus Areas provide a more
detailed examination of the plans and issues in key
locations that will shape the future of Monticello.
Northwest Monticello
This focus area includes the entire northwest corner
of the community. The land use objectives in this area
include:
1. Encourage development in this part of the
community to utilize infrastructure investments
and to provide the capacity to develop in high
amenity areas.
2. Provide for a variety of housing alternatives based
on the natural features and the surrounding
land uses. Areas with high natural amenities or
proximity to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional
Park should be reserved for move up housing.
3. Expansion of existing Places to Work in a manner
that creates more “head of household” jobs.
4. Preserve and promote public use of natural
areas, including the establishment of greenway
corridors.
5. Identify and preserve key street corridors.
6. Preserve areas for future Places to Shop and Places
to Work around a future highway interchange, if
such an interchange proves viable.
The Comprehensive Plan envisions that growth will
extend westward from existing development. The
initial high amenity residential development is expected
to occur along the eastern perimeter of the Bertram
Chain of Lakes Regional Park. No Places to Live are
planned with the boundaries of this park. Future
development will be influenced by the capacity of the
street system, including plans for the construction of
a highway interchange.
The remainder of this section describes the land use
issues and objectives for northwest Monticello in
greater detail.
West Interchange
A new interchange with Interstate 94 is a critical
variable in the future development of this area. While
the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the potential for
a future interchange, in 2008 it is only a concept. It
is not part of the State’s plans for future highway
improvements for this district.
This interchange could be a valuable part of the long-
term transportation plan for Monticello if it is part of
a new river crossing that removes traffic from Highway
25. Without the bridge, the primary benefit is to
provide access to this area and expand the development
opportunities.
The Land Use Plan assumes that the interchange is a
future possibility. For this reason, property adjacent
to the interstate has been placed into a combination
of Places to Live, Work and Shop. The Plan seeks
to prevent development from limiting the location
£¤10 £¤10
Æÿ25
!(14
!(11
!(43
!(50
!(68
!(5!(81
§¨¦
9
4
Æÿ25
!(75
!(18
!(117
!(39
!(106
!(37!(1 3 1
0 0.5 10.25
Miles-
November 1, 2011
Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright
County, and WSB & Associates. Land Use Plan
Legend
Places to Live
Places to Shop
Places to Work
Places to Recreate
Places for Community
Downtown
Mixed Use
Interchange Planning Area
Urban Reserve
Infrastructure
Rivers and Streams
Public Waters Inventory
Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories)
Potential Greenway
Potential Interchange
Future Bridge
Existing Arterial or Collector Road
Proposed Arterial or Collector Road
Powerline
Monticello City Boundary
Orderly Annexation Area
Amended by City Council Resolution 2011-92, September 26, 2011
Figure 3-10: Land Use Plan - Northwest Monticello
3-18 | Land Use City of Monticello
of the interchange (or block it) and to preserve the
area around the interchange for future commercial,
industrial and residential development. Without
the access provided by the interchange, commercial,
industrial and residential development should not be
anticipated in this area.
Ideally, the City will pursue additional investigations
following the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan.
These investigations should be designed to resolve some
of the unanswered questions related to the interchange.
These questions include:
f Where should the interchange be located?
f What is the potential for a new river bridge
connection?
f How would the interchange be funded and what
are the financial and land use implications for the
City?
f What time frame should be used in planning for
the improvements?
The answers to these questions provide invaluable
guidance to future land use and transportation in
Monticello. The area included in future planning
should not be limited to the property in the Interchange
Planning Area land use category. An interchange
and the supporting street system has future land use
implications for a broader area.
Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park
Another critical factor in the future of the Northwest
Area is the former YMCA camp that is being converted
into the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. The
City and Wright County formed a partnership in 2005
to start purchasing portions of the 1,200 acre YMCA
property. As of 2013, 495 acres have been purchased
through state grants with another 300 planned for
acquisition. The YMCA will lease land at the regional
park to run their Camp Manitou Summer Camp.
The area around this park is guided for future Places to
Live. No residential development should be allowed
within the park. The amenity of this land and the
regional park provide an excellent setting (around
the perimeter of the park) for some of the “upscale”
neighborhoods and housing desired by the City.
In planning for this park, it is important to look
beyond the boundaries of the park and to its context
in the broader community. The illustration in Figure
3-11 highlights several key community development
opportunities:
f The City must create connections between the park
and other sections of Monticello.
f Building streets in a “parkway” design emphasizes
the desired qualities of a regional park and of the
surrounding Places to Live and Work.
f The park is a critical piece in creating a “greenway”
system that links to the Mississippi River and may,
over time, ring the community.
Industrial Growth
The Northwest area is a critical location for current and
future industrial development. The Monticello Business
Center, located south of Chelsea Road and west of 90th
Street, has already started to be developed as a high
amenity environment with protective covenants that
address building materials, loading docks, outdoor
storage, and landscaping. In order to provide sufficient
land for Business Campus uses over the next 25 years,
the Comprehensive Plan extends this land use south to
the planned expansion of School Boulevard.
It is important to recognize that activity generated
by business development can create conflicts with
residential development. The Comprehensive Plan
seeks to create both high quality business parks and
residential neighborhoods in this area. Careful site
planning and development management will be needed
to meet these objectives.
School Boulevard Extension
The Northwest Area serves as a good example of the
need to coordination land use and transportation
planning. An extension of School Boulevard is
needed to provide access to the area and to connect
development to the rest of the community. The route
of this roadway should be identified and preserved as
development occurs.
School Boulevard has several other Comprehensive
Plan implications:
Land Use | 3-192008 Comprehensive Plan ~ Updated 2013
f This major collector street will influence the nature
of adjacent land use.
f Streetscape improvements would help to define
the high quality character desired by the City as a
gateway to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional
Park and to new neighborhoods.
f The street is a means for bringing trail connections
to the park.
Golf Course
In 2006, the Silver Springs Golf Course was part of a
development proposal (Jefferson at Monticello) that
would have redeveloped this property mixing golf and
housing. The development did not proceed beyond the
environmental review.
The Comprehensive Plan shows the area as Places to
Recreate based on the continued use as a golf course.
This designation does not preclude a future proposal
and Comprehensive Plan amendment for residential
development. It is likely, however, that this scale of new
development will require the access provided by a new
highway interchange. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to
fill in other development areas and make effective use
of other infrastructure investments before extending
utilities for redevelopment of the golf course.
Downtown Focus Area
The Embracing Downtown Plan was adopted by City
Council resolution 2012-011 on January 9, 2012
and is herein incorporated as an appendix of the
Comprehensive Plan.
YMCA
Regional
Park
Existing
Natural
Land
Existing
Natural
Land
Potential Parkways
Potential
Greenway
Corridor
Potential
Greenway
Corridor
Existing
Green
Corridor
To Mississippi River
To Mississippi River
25
39
Z35W
Z394
Z94
Figure 3-11: Community Connections to Regional Park
3-20 | Land Use City of Monticello
Downtown Monticello needs special attention
in the Comprehensive Plan. Following the 2008
Comprehensive Plan update, the community undertook
a separate downtown planning process. This process
resulted in the Embracing Downtown Plan. This Plan
emphasizes the importance that the community places
on Downtown. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
relies on the Embracing Downtown Plan as a guide for
public and private actions in the Downtown area.
Revitalizing and sustaining Downtown Monticello
requires a collaborative effort of the City, businesses,
property owners and other stakeholders. Planning
for the future of the Downtown must recognize the
practical realities facing commercial development in
Downtown:
f The configuration and traffic volumes of Highway
25 significantly reduce opportunities for direct
access from the Highway to adjacent properties.
f Traffic volumes on Highway 25 will continue to
increase. Greater volumes and congestion act as an
impediment for people living south of I-94 coming
to Downtown.
f There is no controlled intersection on Highway
25 between Broadway and 7th Street. The lack
of a controlled intersection combined with traffic
volumes make pedestrian connections between
Downtown and residential areas to the east very
difficult.
f “Big box” and retail development continue to occur
in other parts of Monticello. These businesses
directly compete with the Downtown and attract
smaller businesses (that might otherwise consider
a Downtown location) to adjacent parcels.
Downtown Goals
Given current plans and conditions, the Embracing
Downtown Plan and the Comprehensive Plan
recommends the following goals for Downtown.
Concepts for Downtown redevelopment should
provide solutions to problems and issues identified
in the research and analysis of Downtown conditions
that are directed by the stated goals for Land Use,
Transportation and Design and Image. The preferred
solutions should be those that best meet these goals.
Land Use
f Diversify land use in the Downtown; supplement
retail and service uses with other activities that
generate traffic.
f Encourage redevelopment of old and obsolete
structures; encourage consolidation of small
parcels with multiple ownerships.
f Balance parking and land use to ensure availability
of adequate parking at all times.
f Encourage mixed use but do not make it a
requirement or prerequisite for development or
redevelopment.
f Discourage residential as a free-standing land use
within the core downtown area.
f Establish physical connections between the core
Downtown area and the riverfront and park.
f Encourage land uses that serve as evening and
weekend attractions to the Downtown area.
f Expand facilities and parking adjacent to West
Bridge Park to help create an anchor attraction at
the north end of Walnut Street.
Transportation
f Acknowledge that Highway 25 will be limited in
terms of providing direct property access.
f Develop circulation patterns that utilize local
streets for individual site access.
f Recognize Highway 25 as a barrier between the
east and west parts of the historic Downtown core
areas extending to either side of the Highway 25
corridor.
f Consider developing in districts to reduce the need
or desire to cross Highway 25 between 7th street
and the river crossing.
f Strengthen pedestrian ties throughout Downtown
including connections to other parts of the City to
the south, west, and east. Downplay Highway 25
as a corridor for pedestrian movement.
f Improve pedestrian connections between Broadway
Street and the riverfront Park area to allow the park
to serve as an attraction that brings people into the
downtown area.
f Improve access to the Mississippi River to expand
on recreational opportunities.
Land Use | 3-212008 Comprehensive Plan ~ Updated 2013
51
Chapter 3 - Downtown Framework Plan and Design Guidelines Framework for Downtown Development
The alternative downtown redevelopment concepts, including the preferred alternative illustrated in
Refined Scheme A (Figure 20) represent and illustrate possibilities for ways that market demand that
exists in the Monticello Trade Area can fit within the northern half of the CD where the greatest
potential for redevelopment exists. The
plans show specific uses and parking
relationships that may, or may not
accurately depict how opportunities are
captured over time within the CCD.
However, what is specific about the
preferred alternative is the general
organization of uses, and the location
of types of uses within the CCD. Figure
21, the Redevelopment Framework
Plan, illustrates the recommended use
districts consistent with the
preferences illustrated in Refined
Scheme A.
Proposed use areas, or districts, in the
Framework Plan are based on access,
location within the CCD, and
surrounding land use relationships. The
Framework Plan represents the
flexibility needed to capture all
potential development and
redevelopment opportunities for the
CCD. As opportunities present
themselves and are evaluated,
locations for uses should fit the
purpose and capabilities of the districts
illustrated in the Framework Plan. The
use districts are defined in greater
detail as part of the proposed Design
Guidelines for the CCD.
Structure for Design Guidelines
The Design Guidelines are intended to correspond to the limits of the CCD Zoning District, and to
establish development controls within the CCD. With the recent modifications to the Monticello Zoning
Code, the development standards for the CCD District were revised to refer to the CCD Design
Guidelines as the controlling legislation for land use, site development standards, and building design
Figure 21 – Framework Plan
Figure 3-12: Framework Plan from the Embracing Downtown Plan
3-22 | Land Use City of Monticello
f Explore creation of a fourth signalized intersection
on Highway 25 between 7th Street and Broadway
Street to improve access to areas with development
and redevelopment potential on either side of the
Highway 25 corridor.
Downtown Design and Image
f Encourage design standards that elevate the quality
of Downtown development without creating undue
hardships for property and building owners.
f Acknowledge that the historic “Main Street”
buildings and developments along Broadway
Street are functionally obsolete for many tenants
and users in today’s automobile and convenience-
driven marketplace.
f The public realm of streets, boulevards and
sidewalks represents the best opportunity to create
an interim image for downtown as it redevelops.
f The Highway 25 and Broadway corridors should be
softened with streetscape and landscape features to
offset the effects of high traffic volumes, and to help
establish an identity for the Central Community
District (CCD).
f Development should orient toward the intersection
of Highway 25 with Broadway to take advantage of
high traffic volumes in the Highway 25 corridor.
f New development in the Highway 25 corridor
should be scaled to allow visibility to development
up to a block or more away from Highway 25.
f New buildings in the Highway 25 and Broadway
corridors should be located to allow for eventual
widening of the corridor right-of-way and
roadway.
f To the extent possible, buildings should occupy
street frontages and should front on public
sidewalks with connections to a continuous
“Downtown” sidewalk pedestrian system.
f Proposed uses should have adequate parking
(private or public) within easy and convenient
walking distance.
f The Downtown plan should provide strategically
located public gathering spaces to bring people
together to experience a sense of community that
is associated with downtown.
South Central Focus Area
Continued residential growth to the south is an
important element of the Comprehensive Plan. This
growth achieves several objectives:
f It helps to facilitate the expansion of the sanitary
sewer system in conjunction with the reconstruction
of Fallon Avenue. This sanitary sewer capacity is
The Comprehensive Plan seeks to enhance the existing commercial core along Broadway by building
strong connections with the riverfront and the civic/retail district on the south end of Walnut Street.
The current end of Walnut Street is a barrier to improving connections between Downtown and the
riverfront.
Land Use | 3-232008 Comprehensive Plan ~ Updated 2013
needed to support future industrial growth area
along Highway 25.
f These areas encourage growth in areas that could
use the new eastern interchange with I-94 rather
than Highway 25.
f These areas provide appropriate locations for
continued growth in entry-level single family homes
and medium density housing types. These Places
to Live are important elements of maintaining an
adequately diverse housing stock.
f Orderly expansion to the south moves development
towards area of higher natural amenity. Areas along
the southern edge of the Orderly Annexation Area
provide another location for potential “move up”
housing.
A key to development in this focus area is the
construction of the Fallon Avenue bridge. The bridge
leads to the reconstruction of Fallon Avenue and the
related expansion of municipal sanitary sewer and
water systems. Future development will be limited
without additional utility capacity.
East Focus Area
The Comprehensive Plan places greater priority on
growth to the west and south. Development should
be directed to areas that most effectively achieve the
objectives of this Plan.
Several factors could cause the City to encourage future
residential development in the East Focus Area:
Figure 3-14: Land Use Plan - East Focus Area
£¤10 £¤10
Æÿ25
!(14
!(11
!(43
!(50
!(68
!(5!(81
§¨¦
9
4
Æÿ25
!(75
!(18
!(117
!(39
!(106
!(37!(1 3 1
0 0.5 10.25
Miles-
November 1, 2011
Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright
County, and WSB & Associates. Land Use Plan
Legend
Places to Live
Places to Shop
Places to Work
Places to Recreate
Places for Community
Downtown
Mixed Use
Interchange Planning Area
Urban Reserve
Infrastructure
Rivers and Streams
Public Waters Inventory
Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories)
Potential Greenway
Potential Interchange
Future Bridge
Existing Arterial or Collector Road
Proposed Arterial or Collector Road
Powerline
Monticello City Boundary
Orderly Annexation Area
Amended by City Council Resolution 2011-92, September 26, 2011
£¤10 £¤10
Æÿ25
!(14
!(11
!(43
!(50
!(68
!(5!(81
§¨¦
9
4
Æÿ25
!(75
!(18
!(117
!(39
!(106
!(37!(1 3 1
00.510.25
Miles-
November 1, 2011
Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright
County, and WSB & Associates. Land Use Plan
Legend
Places to Live
Places to Shop
Places to Work
Places to Recreate
Places for Community
Downtown
Mixed Use
Interchange Planning Area
Urban Reserve
Infrastructure
Rivers and Streams
Public Waters Inventory
Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories)
Potential Greenway
Potential Interchange
Future Bridge
Existing Arterial or Collector Road
Proposed Arterial or Collector Road
Powerline
Monticello City Boundary
Orderly Annexation Area
Amended by City Council Resolution 2011-92, September 26, 2011
Figure 3-13: Land Use Plan - South Central
f Increased overall housing demand that exceeds the
capacity to support growth in other areas.
f Traffic congestion on Highway 25 that increases the
need to channel use to the east interchange.
f The need to solve stormwater and drainage
management issues (Ditch 33) in this area. Solving
drainage issues allows eastward expansion along
County Road 18.
Future growth in the east should continue to fill in the
development area within the Orderly Annexation Area
on the east side of Monticello. The natural features in
these areas allow for higher amenity neighborhoods.
This growth can occur with new collector/arterial
street corridors.
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
1
7F.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinanceNo.594amendingtheMonticelloZoning
Ordinance,Chapter3,Section4(I)asrelatedtoguidingprinciplesandlocations
forfutureR-4(Medium-HighDensityResidence)zoningdistricts.Applicant:
CityofMonticello (NAC)
A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND:
Legal:NA
PlanningCaseNumber:2014-016
Request(s):Considerincorporatingspecificguidingprinciplesinto
thetextoftheR-4ZoningDistrictrelatingto
appropriatelocationsforhousingallowedbythe
district.
DeadlineforDecision:NA
LandUseDesignation:NA
ZoningDesignation:Thepurposeofthe“R-4”highdensityresidential
districtistoprovideforhighdensityhousingin
multiplefamilystructuresovertwelve(12)unitsfor
conditionaluseorplannedunitdevelopmentprojects,
anddirectlyrelated,complementaryuses.
Overlays/Environmental
RegulationsApplicable:NA
CurrentSiteUse:NA
SurroundingLandUses:NA
ANALYSIS
ThePlanningCommissionandCityCouncilmetinjointsessiontodiscussoptions
forimplementingtheR-4ZoningDistrictinfuturedevelopmentproposals.Whenthe
R-4districtwasestablished,itwasdesignedtobequiteprescriptiveinits
requirements,withthegeneralintentbeingthathighstandardsfordevelopment
quality(anotherwiseambiguousphrase)wouldbeestablishedup-front.Thetradefor
significantlyhigherstandardswasthewillingnesstoincreasedensity,andsometimes
buildingsize,toaccommodatethecostsandphysicalrequirementsimposedbythe
newstandards.
Leftundeterminedatthetimeofadoptionofthedistrictwerepotentiallocationsfor
R-4zoning.Itwasgenerallyunderstoodthattherewereawidevarietyofcriteriathat
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
2
maycontributetoanappropriate,orinappropriatelocationforhighdensity
development.TheComprehensivePlandoesnotdirecthigherdensitybylanduse
categories–thegeneralcategoryof“PlacestoLive”isusedforallresidential
development.
Toaddressthisissuemoredirectly,theCityisconsideringtwoamendmentstohelp
identifypotentialhighdensityresidentiallanduses.Thoseamendmentsinclude
additionallanguageintheComprehensivePlanandtheR-4ZoningDistrictthat
specifyconditionsunderwhichtheCitywillconsiderpotentialrezoningsfrom
currentdesignationstotheR-4District.
Factorsandprincipleswerediscussedatthejointworkshopreferredtoabove.There
wereseveralsuchconsiderationsthatcameoutoftheworkshop,withvaryingpriority
andcombinations.Alongwithageneralcommentthatfactorsworkincombination,
andnosinglefactorisdeterminative.Wehavesummarizedthosefactorsasfollows:
1.ReplacementLandUse.Thisfactorincorporatesanideathatin
rezoningpropertytoR-4,someotherzoningcategorywillbelostonthe
subjectsite.TheconsensusofthejointworkshopwasthatR-4zoningcould
fitthefollowingzoningcategoriesandcircumstances,withappropriate
clarificationsspecifictoanyindividualsite:
A.LandalreadyzonedR-3wouldlikelybeappropriatefortheR-
4district:
B.Landcurrentlyzonedforcommercialuses,butwhichwould
notbeconsidered“prime”commercial,wouldlikelybeappropriatefor
R-4.
C.Landcurrentlyzonedforcommercialuses,butwhichwouldbe
considered“prime”,wouldnotlikelybeappropriateforrezoningtoa
residentialcategory,inanefforttoprotectthoseareasthatshowthe
mostpromiseforcommercialuseinthefuture.
2.Localtransportationnetwork.Accesstomajorstreets,oratthevery
minimum,avoidanceoftrafficgenerationthatwouldutilizelocalstreetsfor
lowerdensityresidentialareas,isarequirementofanR-4rezoning
consideration.
3.ArchitecturalCompatibilityandBuildingMassing.Thejointmeeting
participantsgenerallyagreedthatwhenlocatedverynearlowerdensity
residentialareas,thesizeandmassingofthebuildingorbuildingsintheR-4
projectwouldbeaconsiderationfordenyinganR-4proposal.R-4projects
wouldneedtobelowerprofile,orscreenedandbufferedbydistanceand
naturalfeatures(suchasmaturetreesandtopography)whennearlowdensity
residential.
4.Adequatepublicfacilities.Abaselinefactorformulti-family
residentiallocationwouldbearequirementforessentialpublicservicessuch
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
3
asutilitiesandopenspace.HighqualityR-4propertywouldhavepositive
relationshipstopublicparksand/orpathwayswithoutoverlyburdeningthem.
Thiscanincludearequirementtoprovideadditionalfacilitiestomeetthe
City’sopenspaceplanningpolicies.
5.ProximitytoLowerDensityResidentialNeighborhoods.Proximityto
lowerdensitywasnotconsideredtobeanautomaticdisqualifierforR-4
zoningconsideration.Instead,amore“performance-based”combinationof
thefactorsabovewouldprevailinsuchsituations.
6.ProximitytootherHighDensityResidentialNeighborhoods.Itwas
notedinthejointmeetingthatanover-concentrationofhighdensity
residentialcanbeafactorthatleadstothenegativestereotypethathigh-
densityhousingcarries.Assuch,proximitytoothermulti-familyareasmay
beseenasanegative,dependingonthenatureandconcentrationofthe
existinghousing.
Intheattachedordinance,anextensiverevisiontothepurposestatementoftheR-4
Districtreflectingtheseprinciplesisproposed,languagethatwouldalsobereflected
intheComprehensivePlanrelatingtohousingandlanduse.Withtheseamendments,
theCitywouldbeabletodirectfuturedevelopmentintereststoareasthatare
consideredtobeappropriatesitesforhigher-densityhousing,whileretaining
extensivediscretionoverrezoningactionsbasedonlocalizedconcernsonaparcel-
by-parcelbasis.
PlanningCommissionRecommendation
ThePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingonthisordinance,andthe
companionamendmenttotheComprehensivePlan,onApril1,2014.Noonefrom
thepublicspoketotheproposedordinanceoramendmentatthehearing.The
PlanningCommissionfoundthattheproposedamendmentsproperlyreflectedthe
City’sintentformultiplefamilyresidentialdevelopmentandR-4districtlocations,
andvotedtorecommendadoptionoftheamendmentstoboththeR-4districtandthe
housingtextintheComprehensivePlan.ThePlanningCommissiondidnot
recommendre-designationofanyspecificparcelsatthetime,althoughtherewas
discussionastowhethersuchanactionshouldbeconsidered.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS
ThePlanningCommissionrecommendsAlternative1below.
1.MotiontoadoptOrdinanceNo.594amendingtheR-4ZoningDistrictto
incorporatefactorsandprinciplesintothecodetomanageanddirectthelocations
forfutureR-4areas.
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofOrdinanceNo.594atthistime.
CityCouncilAgenda:04/28/14
4
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION
StaffsupportstheamendmentstobothzoningandComprehensivePlan.Itis
believedthatbothareappropriatetoreinforcetheCity’scommitmenttohigh-density
housingthatwillbeconsideredtobeapositiveadditiontothecommunity’shousing
stock,ofthehighestqualityandwelllocatedtobesuccessfulwithoutcompromising
existingneighborhoodareas.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA
A.OrdinanceNo.594
B.R-4DistrictRegulations
C.JointCityCouncilandPlanningCommissionMinutes,November25,2013
(providedwithpreviousitem)
D.MonticelloComprehensivePlan,LandUseMap (providedwithpreviousitem)
E.MonticelloComprehensivePlan,Chapter3,LandUse (providedwithprevious
item)
F.OfficialMonticelloZoningMap (providedwithpreviousitem)
ORDINANCENO.594
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
ANORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE10OFTHEMONTICELLOCITYCODE,
KNOWNASTHEZONINGORDINANCE,BYAMENDINGCHAPTER3.4(I),R-4,
MEDIUM-HIGHDENSITYRESIDENCEDISTRICT,PROVIDINGFORDEFINITION
OFSTANDARDSANDLOCATIONSFORTHEPROVISIONOFHIGHDENSITY
RESIDENTIALHOUSING
THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFMONTICELLOHEREBYORDAINS:
Section1.Section3.4(I)–Medium-HighDensityResidenceDistrict,Title10–Zoning
Ordinanceisherebyamendedbychangingthefollowingonthetitlepage:
Thepurposeofthe“R-4”,medium-highdensityresidentialdistrictistoprovide
formediumtohighdensityhousinginmultiplefamilystructuresof13ormore
unitsperbuilding,andatdensitiesofbetween10and25unitsperacre.The
districtisintendedtoestablishhigherdensityresidentialopportunitiesinareas
appropriateforsuchhousing,tobedeterminedbytheCityonacasebycase
basis.TheCityofMonticelloshallzonelandtotheR-4Districtonlywhen,inits
solediscretion,allaspectsofthepropertysupportthepotentialusesoftheR-4
district,includinglocation,privateandpublicservices,andcompatibilitywith
existingandfuturelandusesinthearea.Inmakingadeterminationastothe
suitabilityofasiteforR-4rezoning,theCitywillprioritizethefollowingsiteand
areafactors:
ReplacementLandUses.R-4zoningfitsthefollowingzoningcategoriesand
circumstances:
LandalreadyzonedforR-3.
Landcurrentlyzonedforcommercialuses,butwhichwouldnotbe
considered“prime”commercial(theCitywouldliketoprotect
“prime”commercialareasthatshowthemostpromiseforthatusein
thefuture).
ProximitytoOtherResidentialNeighborhoods.
R-4zoningmaybeallowedinproximitytoothermediumtohighdensity
residentialareas,howeverthenatureandconcentrationofexistingmulti-
familystructuresshallbecarefullyconsideredtoavoidanover
concentrationoftheseuses.
R-4zoningmaybeallowedinproximitytolowerresidentialuses,ifitis
determinedthatthehighdensitysitecanaddressthesiteandareafactors
providedhere.
ORDINANCENO.594
ArchitecturalCompatibilityandBuildingMassing.
Inthevicinityoflowerdensityresidentialareas,R-4Districtbuildings
needtobelowerprofilewithregardstosizeandmass,orneedtobe
screenedorbufferedbydistanceandnaturalfeatures.
RequirementforAdequatePublicFacilities.Highdensityresidential
developmentshallbelocatedtoprovideforthefollowingessentialservicesand
amenities:
Accesstopublicparks,pathways,andopenspace,without
overburdeningthem.R-4developmentmayberequiredtoprovide
additionalfacilitiestomeettheCity’sopenspaceplanningpolicies.
Connectiontopublicutilities.
Accesstomajorstreets,orattheveryminimum,avoidanceoftraffic
generationthatwouldutilizelocalstreetsinlowerdensityresidential
areas.
Proximitytocommercialand/ormedicalservices.
Thisdistrictisintendedtoprovideexclusivelymultiplefamilyhousingasdefined
inthisordinance,asopposedtolowerdensityhousingtypessuchastownhouses,
two-familyhomes,orsinglefamilyhomes.
Section2.TheCityClerkisherebyinstructedtomarktheofficialzoningmaptoreflectthis
ordinance.Themapshallnotberepublishedatthistime.
Section3.TheCityClerkisherebydirectedtomakethechangesrequiredbythisOrdinance
aspartoftheOfficialMonticelloCityCode,Title10,ZoningOrdinance,andto
renumberthetablesandchaptersaccordinglyasnecessarytoprovidetheintended
effectofthisOrdinance.TheCityClerkisfurtherdirectedtomakenecessary
correctionstoanyinternalcitationsthatresultfromsaidrenumberingprocess,
providedthatsuchchangesretainthepurposeandintentoftheZoningOrdinance
ashasbeenadopted.
Section4.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafteritspassageand
publication.RevisionswillbemadeonlineafteradoptionbyCouncil.Copiesof
thecompleteZoningOrdinanceareavailableonlineandatMonticelloCityHall.
ORDINANCENO.594
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis28thdayofApril,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
__________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
VOTINGINFAVOR:
VOTINGINOPPOSITION:
CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS
Section 3.4 Residential Base Zoning Districts
Subsection (I) R-4: Medium-High Density Residence District
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 103
(I) R-4: Medium-High Density Residence District
Section 3.4 (I)
R-4 Medium-High Density Residence District
The purpose of the “R-4”, medium-high density residential district is to provide for medium to high
density housing in multiple family structures of 13 or more units per building, and at densities of between
10 and 25 units per acre. The district is intended to establish higher density residential opportunities in
areas appropriate for such housing, including those areas with access to commercial and/or medical
services, higher capacity transportation facilities, and other adequate public services including park and
pathway access. The City of Monticello shall zone land to the R-4 District only when, in its sole
discretion, all aspects of the property support the potential uses of the R-4 district, including location,
private and public services, and compatibility with existing and future land uses in the area. This district
is intended to provide exclusively multiple family housing as defined in this ordinance, as opposed to
lower density housing types such as townhouses, two-family homes, or single family homes.
Minimum and Maximum Density:
10 – 25 dwelling units per acre
Maximum Base Density:
1,750 sq. ft. per unit (25 units per acre)
Maximum Density through Planned Unit
Development:
1,750 sq. ft. per unit (25 units per acre)
Base Lot Area
Minimum = 30,000 square feet
CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS
Section 3.4 Residential Base Zoning Districts
Subsection (I) R-4: Medium-High Density Residence District
Page 104 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
TABLE 3-9: R-4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
R-4 District
Multi-Family (13+ units / building)
Base Lot size 30,000 sf
Gross Density 10-25 du/acre
Max Density w/o PUD NA
Net lot area per du Max 1,750 sf/du
Front setback 100 feet
Corner side setback 40 feet
Interior side setback 30 feet
Rear setback to building 40 feet
Clear open space setback from
ROW
60 feet
Clear open space setback from
Property Line
40 feet – no more than 50% of any yard facing a street covered with parking/drive aisles
Buffer Req. to Single Family C buffer
Common open space per du 500 sf/du
Landscaping 2 ACI/ 2,500 sf open space + 4 shrubs /10 feet bldg. perimeter
Parking requirements 2.25 spaces/du, with max 1.1 space/du uncovered
Architecture 20% street min frontage covered with enhanced materials, horizontal siding of steel or
cement-board only (no vinyl or aluminum)
Roofs 5:12 pitch, plus roof ridge line articulation of 3 feet min.
Unit square feet 900 sf finished floor area per unit, minimum
Garages Attached or Underground
Detached accessory garages allowed only after base requirements are met
Garage Setback May not access street directly – must be served by interior driveway
Garage Doors Must include glass and decorative panels if visible from public street or adjoining
residentially zoned property
CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS
Section 3.4 Residential Base Zoning Districts
Subsection (I) R-4: Medium-High Density Residence District
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 105
Table 3-9 (continued)
PUD Options for
Multi-Family Buildings Multi-Family (6 – 12 units / building)
Landscaping Increased landscape quantities and/or sizes beyond code minimums; Special landscape
features including water features, recreational structures, patios, etc.
Open Space Increased open space areas per unit beyond code minimums of 10% or more
Parking All required garage parking underground
Building Materials Increased use of stone, brick beyond front, or on other exterior walls
Architecture Extensive use of ornamental features, building and/or roofline articulation, fenestration
and building wall undulation atypical of other buildings in similar zoning districts
Site Work Use of decorative paving materials in parking, sidewalks, etc.;
Extensive use of ornamental site lighting or similar features.
Housing for Seniors restricted
to 55 years of age or more
Accommodations to design and density through PUD process only