City Council Agenda Packet 05-27-2014AGENDA
REGULARMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL
TUESDAY,May27,2014–7p.m.
MississippiRoom,MonticelloCommunityCenter
Mayor:ClintHerbst
CouncilMembers:LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta,BrianStumpf
1.CalltoOrderandPledgeofAllegiance
2A.ApprovalofMinutes–May12,2014RegularMeeting
3.Considerationofaddingitemstotheagenda
4.Citizencomments,publicserviceannouncements,andupdates
a.CitizenComments:
b.PublicServiceAnnouncements:
1)Walk‘nRoll(6/14)
c.Updates:
1)MarketMatching
2)I-94ConstructionProject
3)DepartmentofBuildingSafetyreport
5.ConsentAgenda:
A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillsforMay27th
B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments
C.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-053toacceptacontributionfrom
UptownEyecarefortheCommunityCenterFarmer’sMarket
D.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-054toacceptacontributionfrom
TDSTelecomfortheCommunityCenter’sVisitwithSantaprogram
E.Considerationofrejectingallbidsforthepurchaseofanewfiretender
F.Considerationofapprovingadditionalworkforaudit/conversionofFiberNet’s
SourceOnebillingsystem
G.ConsiderationofapprovingaLetterofAgreementbetweentheCityofMonticello
andNorthernStatesPowerCompany-Minnesotaforprovisionofemergency
services
H.ConsiderationofadoptingResolutions#2014-055acceptingquotesandawarding
contractforthe2014SealcoatandFogSealProject
I.Considerationofapprovinganinvestmentupto$2,500inanapplicationfor
$10,000inmatchingfundsforaBlandinInnovationGrant
6.Considerationofitemsremovedfromtheconsentagendafordiscussion
7.RegularAgenda:
A.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-057approvingtheconditionaluse
permitforcross-access,preliminaryandfinalPlat,anddevelopmentcontract,and
approvingtheDundasRoadeasementagreementandencroachmentagreementfor
theCedarStreetAddition (Goodwill),acommercialsubdivisioninaB-3
(HighwayBusiness)andB-4(RegionalBusiness)District.Applicant:Oppidan
Holdings,LLC
B.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#596amendingTitle10oftheMonticello
ZoningOrdinance,Chapter2.4(P)–SpecificReviewRequirements,PlannedUnit
DevelopmentsandSection2.3(I)relatingtowrittennotificationforPlannedUnit
Developmentapplications;andadoptingSummaryOrdinance#596Afor
publication
C.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-056approvingaPUDadjustmentfor
theSwanRiverPUDandamendmenttoDevelopmentContractfortheSwan
RiverPUD.Applicant.Miller,Eric/SRCSBuildingCompany,o/b/oSwanRiver
Montessori
D.ConsiderationofapprovingtheconceptofenteringintoaJointPowers
AgreementforpublictransitserviceinMonticelloandotherWrightCountycities
8.Addeditems
9.Adjournment
City Council Minutes – May 12, 2014 Page 1
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING – MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, May 12, 2014 – 7 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Present: Clint Herbst, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta, Brian Stumpf
Absent: None
1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Herbst called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. and declared a quorum present. The
Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
2A. Approval of Minutes – April 28, 2014 Regular Meeting
TOM PERRAULT MOVED TO ACCEPT THE APRIL 28, 2014 MEETING MINUTES
AS CORRECTED. LLOYD HILGART SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED 5-0.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
None
4. Citizen comments, public service announcements, and updates
A. Citizen Comments: None
B. Public Service Announcements:
1) Farmer’s Market (5/15) – Kitty Baltos announced the opening of the
summer Farmer’s Market on Thursday, May 15 from 3:30 to 7 p.m. in the
Library parking lot. The Farmer’s Market has been approved for accepting
SNAP cards and other credit/debit cards. Kitty noted that this is the 8th
year of operation and there are approximately 20 vendors offering a
variety of produce, plants, canned goods, baked goods, meat, eggs, honey,
maple syrup, hand-crafted items, and more.
2) Sound system in Mississippi Room – Kitty Baltos updated Council on
changes that Bill Bruce made to accommodate better sound on the
microphones. He adjusted the mixers and some settings and checked the
microphones and found the main one was bad, which he replaced. Bill
Bruce is also looking into some speakers for the dais and would like to
have someone come in and look at the acoustics in the room before he
makes other updates. He is hoping this cost would be covered by the
Cable Commission. Bill Bruce will keep Kitty Baltos updated. Kitty
Baltos also mentioned she placed papers on the dais with tips for using the
lapel mikes.
City Council Minutes – May 12, 2014 Page 2
C. Updates:
1) Flashing Yellow Arrows (FYA)/I-94 MnDOT Construction – Shibani
Bisson indicated the update will include two topics, one to discuss
implementation of FYA’s on TH 25 that the Council requested MnDOT to
consider. The other topic is the signal adjustments staff has discussed with
MnDOT related to the ramp closures with the I-94 reconstruction project.
At the Council work session on March 24, it was discussed how FYA
could improve operations at the signalized intersections with the intent to
keep traffic moving. Another consideration is safety at these intersections.
Tom Dumont from MnDOT analyzed the safety aspect at these
intersections and provided a summary. Most of the left turns on Hwy 25
are now protected left turns. If they are changed to a permissive signal
(FYA), it may increase the number of crashes. MnDOT safety engineers
look at how much time is needed for a safe left turn and whether the sight
line allows a safe left turn.
Glen Posusta pointed out an issue with the signal at Hwy 25 for
southbound vehicles turning left onto Chelsea Road. Tom Dumont talked
about some of the considerations for installing FYA. Tom Dumont doesn’t
think that FYA during daytime hours would be practical on Hwy 25 as
there is a significant amount of traffic between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m.
However, it might make sense to program them for overnight hours, when
there is less traffic. Tom Dumont indicated that he would not recommend
including FYA’s at the signals along TH 25 at this time.
Clint Herbst suggested it might help to cycle some of the left turn signals
twice in a sequence to keep the left-turning traffic moving better at some
of the intersections on Hwy 25. Tom Dumont mentioned that they are
experimenting with longer cycles in some places and double cycles in
others. Double left turn cycles were implemented at the intersections of
Broadway and Chelsea Road and TH 25 prior to the closure of the
eastbound I-94 on ramps from TH 25 this morning May 12. Glen Posusta
commented on the traffic issues with turning traffic at 7th Street and Hwy
25. Lloyd Hilgart asked why they don’t have FYA on the intersection at
7th and Hwy 25. Tom Dumont explained that the entire intersection must
have separated lanes. He did mention that there are some other options for
traffic movements. He thought it would be good to look at that when the
city does some upgrades at that intersection. Tom Dumont noted that
some cameras have been mounted at various intersections so that MnDOT
can observe the traffic movements and make necessary adjustments.
It was discussed to not pursue implementation of FYA’s at this time.
3) Xcel Plant cask storage campaign – Tim O’Connor introduced himself and
Site Vice President Karen Fili. Karen provided an overview of Xcel’s
extended power uprate. The plant has been operating at approximately
89% power for about 100 days, following an outage that ended in January.
City Council Minutes – May 12, 2014 Page 3
The extended power uprate lasted over a period of three refueling outages.
In 2011 they replaced a steam dryer, which was designed for the
remaining life of the plant and for the power uprate of 671 megawatts.
Karen explained the process of monitoring the steam dryer during the
power uprate and some issues reported to the NRC. The plant is re-
evaluating some of the data at this time so they can bring the plant to full
power.
Tim O’Connor mentioned that one of the discussion points at the recent
public meeting was the dry cask storage. He noted they will be meeting
with the NRC this coming week to discuss an amendment to their license
to accommodate a vendor deficiency in the course of welding the canisters
and one inspection of the weld that cannot be certified. O’Connor went
through some slides explaining the dry fuel storage and canisters that are
used for the storage. One of the inspections that was supposed to be
performed was completed but cannot be certified as it was not done
exactly as required for conformity. There are three possible solutions that
they will be presenting to the NRC. The 1st and 2nd options are not
recommended because it may create a safety issue. They are
recommending a license change request, which is the 3rd option. This
would be in line with what has been tested already and is the least risky
option in terms of safety. Tim O’Connor reviewed all of the steps that are
part of the canister weld process. Clint Herbst asked if there were any
similar situations with dry cask storage in other plants that would be
comparable. O’Connor said there have been some similar experiences that
were used to compare to this situation and they will be using this
information in their presentation. Clint Herbst thanked the representatives
from Xcel for providing this presentation.
4) LMC Annual Conference – Jeff O’Neill noted that the LMC Annual
Conference is being held in St Cloud this year and invited council
members to attend. A flyer was provided to them.
5) FiberNet Monticello – Brian Estrem talked about a purchase for a
replacement switch (router) at the Head-end building and at the 511
building, which will improve the performance of the network. The
funding came from money previously budgeted as part of 2.0
enhancements. Brian Estrem also invited council members to contact him
for a tour of the head-end building so they can see some of the updates
that are being made. Brian Estrem also noted that they have completed
their second billing with SourceOne and it is going very smoothly. Tom
Perrault asked when the budgeting process will start for 2015. Brian
Estrem stated that he is already working with Wayne Oberg on budget
planning for next year. Brian Estrem talked briefly about the need to keep
up with technology upgrades.
City Council Minutes – May 12, 2014 Page 4
6) West County Road 39 Chip Seal Project request from Wright County –
Tom Moores noted that Wright County is in the process of doing some
chip sealing on West CR 39. The contractor on the project is looking for a
flat area to store their product for about one week and has approached the
city to utilize an area in the vicinity of the AME Redi-Mix plant. Tom
Moores said he feels this is appropriate and would make sure they provide
an insurance certificate to waive liability for the city.
Glen Posusta asked Tom Moores about the fading of the yellow lines on
Meadow Oak Avenue where the chip sealing was done. Tom Moores
stated that is due to the epoxy paint that was used with the fog sealing.
They will be revising the type of paint in the future, according to new
industry standards.
7) River Rider Transition – Clint Herbst noted that the city continues to look
at options for another transit provider.
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Consideration of approving payment of bills for May 12th. Recommendation:
B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments.
Recommendation: Ratify new hires and terminations for
C. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-050 to accept a contribution from
Cargill Kitchen Solutions for flower planting on Broadway West.
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution #2014-050 accepting a contribution of
$500 from Cargill Kitchen Solutions for flower plantings.
D. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-051 to accept a contribution from
CenterPoint Energy for gas monitors for the Fire Department and AED equipment
for the Community Center. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution #2014-051
accepting a contribution of $2500 from CenterPoint Energy for gas monitors for
the Fire Department and AED equipment for the Community Center.
E. Consideration of approving an application for an excluded charitable gambling
permit for Riverfest bingo to be conducted by the Monticello Senior Center.
Recommendation: Approve an application for an excluded charitable gambling
permit for the Monticello Senior Center to conduct bingo at Ellison Park during
Riverfest on July 13th.
F. Consideration of approving applications for temporary on-sale liquor licenses for
the Monticello Lions Club for Riverfest Community Celebration on July 12-13,
2014. Recommendation: Approve applications for temporary on-sale liquor
licenses for the Monticello Lions Club for July 12-13, 2014 at Ellison Park and
the Monticello Community Center parking lot.
City Council Minutes – May 12, 2014 Page 5
G. Consideration of approving annual liquor license renewals for 2014-2015,
contingent upon payment of fees and completion of required forms.
Recommendation: Approve annual liquor license renewals for 2014-2015 for
the following license holders, contingent upon payment of fees and submission of
required forms.
Liquor - On-Sale (fee $3,750)
1. Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill & Bar (Apple Minnesota LLC)
2. Beef O’Bradys (TMC & J Taylor Corp.)
3. Buffalo Wild Wings #210 (Blazin Wings Inc.)
4. Capitan Pancho Villa (IC Enterprises LLC)
5. Chatters Restaurant & Bar (West River Restaurants Inc.)
6. Cornerstone Café & Catering (Cornerstone Café & Catering Co.)
7. Hawk’s Sports Bar & Grill (Hawk’s Sports Bar & Grill Inc.)
8. Monticello Country Club (Monticello Country Club Inc.)
9. Rancho Grande (Rancho Grande Mex. Rest. Inc. #2)
10. River City Extreme (River City Lanes Acquisition Group Inc.)
11. The Station Bar & Grill (TDDC LLC)
Liquor – On-Sale, Sunday (fee $200)
1. Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill & Bar (Apple Minnesota LLC)
2. Beef O’Bradys (TMC & J Taylor Corp.)
3. Buffalo Wild Wings #210 (Blazin Wings Inc.)
4. Capitan Pancho Villa (IC Enterprises LLC)
5. Chatters Restaurant & Bar (West River Restaurants Inc.)
6. Cornerstone Café & Catering (Cornerstone Café & Catering Co.)
7. Hawk’s Sports Bar & Grill (Hawk’s Sports Bar & Grill Inc.)
8. Monticello Country Club (Monticello Country Club Inc.)
9. Rancho Grande (Rancho Grande Mex. Rest. Inc. #2)
10. River City Extreme (River City Lanes Acquisition Group Inc)
11. The Station Bar & Grill (TDDC LLC)
12. American Legion Club 260
13. Club Dorchester (VFW 8731)
14. Bluestone Grill (Pauly Companies Inc.)
Liquor - Club (fee-set by statute based on membership)
1. American Legion 260 - $500
2. Club Dorchester (VFW 8731) - $500
Liquor - Wine/Strong Beer Combination ($1,200)
1. Bluestone Grill (Pauly Companies Inc.)
3.2% Beer - On-Sale (fee $275)
1. Bluestone Grill (Pauly Companies Inc.)
2. China Buffet (Lin, Chuan)
3. Monticello Community Center Concessions at Ballfields (City of
Monticello)
3.2% Beer - Off-Sale (fee $100)
1. Cub Foods (Monticello 1998 LLC)
2. Kwik Trip #345 (Kwik Trip Inc.)
City Council Minutes – May 12, 2014 Page 6
3. SuperAmerica #4479 (Northern Tier Retail LLC)
4. Target Store T-2180 (Target Corporation)
5. Wal-Mart Supercenter #3624 (Wal-Mart Stores Inc.)
H. Consideration of appointing a representative to the Monticello Police Advisory
Commission to fill a vacancy for a term to expire on 12/31/2014.
Recommendation: Appoint Elizabeth Cooper to the Monticello Police Advisory
Commission to fill a vacancy for a term to expire December 31, 2014.
I. Consideration of adopting Ordinance #597 amending City Code, Title 2, Chapter
7 – Police Advisory Commission, to amend Council representation.
Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance #597 amending City Code Title 2, Chapter
7 – Police Advisory Commission, as follows:
2-7-2: MEMBERSHIP:
(A) Composition - The Commission shall consist of four general
members and one member of the City Council. The
representative of the City Council shall be a full voting member
of the Commission.
J. Consideration of accepting quotes and approving proposal from Miracle
Recreation Equipment Company for the replacement of River Mill Park
playground equipment. Recommendation: Accept quotes and approve purchase
of playground equipment from Miracle Recreation Equipment Company in the
amount of $43,513.85 plus miscellaneous other costs for a total of $48,013.85,
with a supervised install assisted by Public Works staff.
K. Consideration of adopting Summary Ordinance #592A (Swan River PUD) and
#594A (R-4 zoning districts) to approve condensed ordinances for publication.
Recommendation: Adopt Summary Ordinances #592A and #594A for
publication.
L. Consideration of adopting Ordinance #595 approving the official zoning map for
2014. Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance #595 approving the 2014 City of
Monticello Official Zoning Map, including Shoreland/Floodplain companion
map.
M. Consideration of establishing the Communications Coordinator as a full-time
position. Recommendation: Approve establishment of the Communications
Coordinator as a full-time position.
N. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2014-052 approving Lot 1, Block 1 of
Hillside Farm 3rd Addition, a tax forfeit parcel, to be released to Wright County
for public auction. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution #2014-052 approving
Lot 1, Block 1, Hillside Farm 3rd Addition to be released to Wright County for
public auction.
City Council Minutes – May 12, 2014 Page 7
O. Consideration of adopting Ordinance #598 establishing the Bertram Chain of
Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council in city code and adopting Resolution
#2014-046 approving bylaws for the Advisory Council. Recommendation:
Adopt Ordinance #598 establishing the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park
Advisory Council in City Code as Title 2, Chapter 11 and adopt Resolution
#2014-046 approving bylaws for the Advisory Council.
P. Consideration of approving a letter of recommendation to the Wright County
Board of Commissioners supporting amendments to the Wright County Water
Surface Use Ordinance and the Wright County Park Ordinance as related to
Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM
THE CONSENT AGENDA.
Q. Consideration of approving an agreement between the City of Monticello, Wright
County, and the Minnesota Off-Road Cyclists (MORC) for development and
maintenance of a single-track mountain bike trail at the Bertram Chain of Lakes
Regional Park. Recommendation: Approve an Agreement between the City of
Monticello, Wright County, and Minnesota Off-Road Cyclists (MORC) for
development and maintenance of a single-track mountain bike trail at Bertram
Chain of Lakes Regional Park.
R. Consideration of approving clarification and extension from September 15th to
October 1st in the License Agreement for Shafer Contracting Company, Inc., in
conjunction with MnDOT’s I-94 Reconstruction Project. Recommendation:
Approve a clarification and extension from September 15th to October 1st in the
License Agreement for Shafer Contracting Company, Inc.
S. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for River City Extreme to
allow a helicopter landing in their parking lot at night. THIS ITEM WAS
TABLED INDEFINITELY.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH ITEMS
5S AND 7B TABLED INDEFINITELY TO A FUTURE MEETING AND REMOVAL
OF ITEM 5P. GLEN POSUSTA SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5-
0.
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion
5P. Consideration of approving a letter of recommendation to the Wright County
Board of Commissioners supporting amendments to the Wright County Water Surface
Use Ordinance and the Wright County Park Ordinance as related to Bertram Chain of
Lakes Regional Park
Tom Perrault asked about some of the activities that would be prohibited under these
amendments such as motor boats and jet skis. He also inquired about prohibiting alcohol,
and wondered how that would affect the ballfields. Clint Herbst noted that this subject
had been discussed on the Advisory Council. Alcohol would be prohibited in most areas
City Council Minutes – May 12, 2014 Page 8
of the park according to county standards, but alcohol would be allowed for events at the
athletic fields. Tom Perrault questioned why motors would not be allowed on the lakes.
Clint Herbst explained that the lakes are very small and it was decided not to allow
motorized watercraft. It was noted that electric motors will be allowed.
Lloyd Hilgart asked if power augers and 4-wheelers would be allowed. Power ice augers
would be allowed for the most part, but not 4-wheelers except for special event purposes.
GLEN POSUSTA MOVED TO APPROVE A LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION TO
THE WRIGHT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS IN SUPPORT OF THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE WRIGHT COUNTY WATER SURFACE USE
ORDINANCE AND THE WRIGHT COUNTY PARK ORDINANCE AS RELATED
TO BERTRAM CHAIN OF LAKES REGIONAL PARK. BRIAN STUMPF
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 4-1 WITH TOM PERRAULT
VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
7. Regular Agenda:
A. Consideration of approving the purchase of Phases V and VI of the Bertram
Chain of Lakes Regional Park, including shifted Phase V acreage, and approve
corresponding purchase documents: Phase V Purchase Agreement; Phase VI
Purchase Agreement; Fifth Addendum to the Memorandum of Understanding
between the City of Monticello, Wright County, and the YMCA; Amended and
Restated Shared Use Agreement; Ground Lease; Operating Agreement; and First
Addendum to the Operating Agreement
Angela Schumann explained that she would be reviewing all of the documents to
be approved as part of the purchase of Phase V and VI acquisitions. Angela
Schumann gave a presentation listing all of the agreements that are part of these
acquisitions: Fifth Addendum to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for
the project, Amended and Shared Use Agreement, Phase V purchase agreement,
Phase VI purchase agreement, Phase VI Ground Lease, Phase VI Operating
Agreement, and Phase VI First Addendum to Operating Agreement.
The Phase V purchase agreement is for 40.17 acres which includes a portion of
Parcels 1 and 8. This acquisition utilizes $369,713 awarded with 2012 Outdoor
Recreation grant funds, which is a 50/50 match with the state. The state will
reimburse the city after the purchase is completed. Council approved the match
funding request in August of 2012.
The Phase VI purchase includes 124 land acres which is the balance of Parcels 5,
7, and 8. This acquisition utilizes $1.8 million in grant funds with a portion at an
80/20 match and a portion at a 60/40 match. This purchase includes the beach at
Bertram Lake and completion of shoreland acquisitions at Bertram and Long
Lakes, including the YCMA Camp Manitou lease area. Council approved the
funding request in June of 2013.
City Council Minutes – May 12, 2014 Page 9
Angela Schumann talked about the Fifth Addendum to the MOU. The original
MOU was approved in November of 2008, which outlined the phased purchase of
property and set a final purchase price for approximate 1200 acres of land at
$20.5 million. The Fifth Addendum memorializes the record of the current and
past transactions and includes an extension of the City/County’s ability to
purchase land incrementally through 2015.
Angela Schumann reviewed the Amended and Restated Shared Use Agreement
which provides for shared use of facilities on land owned by both the YMCA and
by the City/County with the majority of ownership shifting to the City/County
now.
The Ground Lease document sets the terms by which the City/County will lease
12.42 acres to the YMCA. The State granting agencies have been advised of this
document and language has been added to satisfy requirements of the State and
YMCA, with a notation that one granting agency’s review may result in
additional minor modifications.
Angela Schumann next discussed the Operating Agreement and First Addendum
which provides day-to-day management structure between the three parties and
outlines a decision-making framework for programs and improvements beyond
those in the Ground Lease.
The recommendation to Council is to approve the agreements as presented and
approve the acquisition of Phases V and VI to create a regional park of almost
1000 land and water acres. This includes ownership of shoreland around Bertram
and Long Lakes, including the Bertram beach plus the area which the YMCA will
lease for its summer youth day camp facility. The Wright County Board will
review this same recommendation tomorrow and make their decision.
Lloyd Hilgart asked about the phases that are left to acquire. Angela Schumann
noted that would depend on grant awards. Angela explained which areas have
been funded by grants, areas that have grant applications in process, and areas that
may be eligible for grants which the city and county will be studying. Clint
Herbst added some comments about the process to acquire the parkland and the
desire to make this into a park that can be enjoyed by families for years to come.
Lloyd Hilgart asked if developments like ALDI’s and Goodwill would generate
park dedication fees. Angela Schumann explained that commercial uses are not
charged for park dedication fees. Lloyd Hilgart stated that it is probably not too
long before there are some new residential developments that will be started and
would generate park dedication fees. Lloyd Hilgart asked if those new park
dedication fees could be put back into the funds which were used to pay for
purchases at Bertram Chain of Lakes Park. Clint Herbst stated that he feels that
was always the intent. Angela Schumann noted that there would be a transfer
authorized as part of this purchase which was identified by the Finance Director.
Angela Schumann also explained how park dedications fees are calculated.
City Council Minutes – May 12, 2014 Page 10
Wayne Oberg commented that MORC (Minnesota Off-Road Cyclists) did a nice
job on the bike trails that are out there.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 TO APPROVE THE
PURCHASE OF PHASES V AND VI OF THE BERTRAM CHAIN OF LAKES
REGIONAL PARK, INCLUDING FUNDING OF AN ESTIMATED
$1,159,353.00 PURCHASE AT CLOSING, INCLUDING SHIFTED PHASE V
ACREAGE, AND TO APPROVE CORRESPONDING PURCHASE
DOCUMENTS: PHASE V PURCHASE AGREEMENT; PHASE VI
PURCHASE AGREEMENT; FIFTH ADDENDUM TO THE MEMORANDUM
OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT
COUNTY, AND THE YMCA; AMENDED AND RESTATED SHARED USE
AGREEMENT; GROUND LEASE; OPERATING AGREEMENT; AND FIRST
ADDENDUM TO THE OPERATING AGREEMENT, AND TO APPROVE A
TRANSFER OF $494,500 TO THE PARK AND PATHWAY FUND FROM
THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND. GLEN POSUSTA SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 4-1 WITH TOM PERRAULT VOTING IN
OPPOSITION.
B. Consideration of accepting bids and awarding contract for a fire tender truck
THIS ITEM WAS TABLED INDEFINITELY.
8. Added items
I-94 Construction – Shibani Bisson noted that the westbound I-94 entrance to the
freeway from CSAH 18 and the westbound off ramp to TH 25 will be closed
starting May 21st.
9. Adjournment
TOM PERRAULT MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:35 P.M. BRIAN
STUMPF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
Recorder: Catherine M. Shuman ____
Approved:
Attest: _________________________
City Administrator
CityCouncilAgenda:5/27/14
1
5A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillregistersforMay27th (WO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
Citystaffsubmitstheattachedbillregistersandpurchasingcardregistersforapprovalby
Council.Thebillregisterscontainallinvoicesprocessedandthepurchasingcard
registerscontainallcardpurchasesmadesincethelastCouncilmeeting.SubjecttoMN
Statutes,mostinvoicesrequireCouncilapprovalpriortoreleasingchecksforpayment.
ThedayfollowingCouncilapproval,paymentswillbereleasedunlessdirected
otherwise.AcreditpurchasingagreementandpolicywasapprovedbyCouncilinitially
andcardpurchasesmustcomplywiththepolicy.
IfCouncilhasnoquestionsorcommentsonthebillandpurchasecardregisters,thesecan
beapprovedwiththeconsentagenda.Ifrequested,thisitemcanberemovedfrom
consentanddiscussedpriortomakingamotionforapproval.
A1.BudgetImpact:None
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Noadditionalworkrequired
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovethebillandpurchasecardregistersforatotalamountof
$610,865.94.
2.MotiontoapprovetheregisterswithchangesdirectedbyCouncil.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1or#2,perdirectionofCouncil.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Billregisters
PurchaseCardregisters
User:
Printed:05/21/2014 - 11:27AM
Ann.Zimmerman
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch:00201.05.2014 - 201.05.2014 May US Bank
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:2439 DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT & ECON DEVELOPMNT Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True
07975675 Quarter 1 2014 Unemployment Benefits 2,136.80 05/15/2014 101-45201-414200
07975675 Quarter 1 2014 Unemployment Benefits 1,730.00 05/15/2014 101-43120-414200
07975675 Quarter 1 2014 Unemployment Benefits 178.56 05/15/2014 609-49754-414200
07975675 Quarter 1 2014 Unemployment Benefits 4,352.00 05/15/2014 101-43111-414200
07975675 Quarter 1 2014 Unemployment Benefits 729.00 05/15/2014 655-49870-414200
9,126.36Check Total:
Vendor:1604 HEALTH PARTNERS Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True
47612787 June 2014 55,686.71 05/15/2014 101-00000-217060
47612787 June 2014 1,119.02 05/15/2014 101-00000-217062
56,805.73Check Total:
Vendor:3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True
5/1/14 May 2014 1,765.68 05/15/2014 101-00000-217066
1,765.68Check Total:
Vendor:1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True
10128 Qtr1 2014 118 6th W Prairie Center 39.23 05/15/2014 101-41941-438200
10250 Qtr1 2014 3698 1/2 School Blvd H.E. Garage 39.23 05/15/2014 655-49870-438200
5250 Qtr 1 2014 Bridge Pk West 107 River St W Rm 38.06 05/15/2014 101-45201-438200
7224 Qtr 1 2014 WWTP 1,984.20 05/15/2014 602-49480-438200
7256 Qtr 1 2014 utx - MGFARM - 100 Broadway E 48.64 05/15/2014 213-46522-438200
7256 Qtr 1 2014 MGFARM - 100 Broadway E 126.72 05/15/2014 213-46522-438200
7885 Qtr 1 2014 Help Center 42.96 05/15/2014 217-41990-438200
8086 Qtr 1 2014 4th St Warming House 38.06 05/15/2014 101-45201-438200
8114 Qtr 1 2014 HiWay Liquor 94.02 05/15/2014 609-49754-438200
8117 Qtr 1 2014 MCC 3,027.68 05/15/2014 226-45122-438200
8119 Qtr 1 2014 Fire Station 52.77 05/15/2014 101-42200-438200
8120 Qtr 1 2014 Bldg Inspection Garage 38.06 05/15/2014 101-41940-438200
8177 Qtr 1 2014 Library 185.17 05/15/2014 101-45501-438200
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 11:27 AM)Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
8631 Qtr 1 2014 203 Chelsea Rd Animal Shelter 121.43 05/15/2014 101-42700-438200
8673 Qtr 1 2014 utx - Head End Building 17.00 05/15/2014 655-49870-438200
8673 Qtr 1 2014 Head End Building 21.06 05/15/2014 655-49870-438200
8903 Qtr 1 2014 PW Shop/Clerical 101.81 05/15/2014 101-43127-438200
8904 Qtr 1 2014 PW Vehicle Storage 389.93 05/15/2014 101-43127-438200
8905 Qtr 1 2014 PW Office 38.06 05/15/2014 101-43127-438200
6,444.09Check Total:
Vendor:3337 SECURE PAYMENT SYSTEMS INC Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True
5/9/14 April access fee 25.00 05/15/2014 655-49870-443980
25.00Check Total:
Vendor:2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True
5/6/14 Cub - re-sale 36.98 05/15/2014 609-49750-425500
5/6/14 Cub - re-sale 35.28 05/15/2014 609-49750-425500
5/6/14 Cub - re-sale 61.45 05/15/2014 609-49750-425500
5/6/14 Cub - rehab-water; Gatorade; Powerade 56.25 05/15/2014 101-42200-443990
5/6/14 Gradys - (1) lockpin assy 2 1/4"; (4) 10x14 "No Parking" sign 13.15 05/15/2014 101-42200-421990
5/6/14 Gradys - (1) 175W high int Disch bulb 17.99 05/15/2014 101-42200-422300
5/6/14 Gradys - #555-(3) ignition keys 8.97 05/15/2014 101-42400-421990
5/6/14 Radioshack - Gigaware-(2) 6' cable; (1) changer; (1) gender chan 70.49 05/15/2014 655-49870-421990
5/6/14 ORyans - (29.545) gallons unit #2 - D.S. 102.20 05/15/2014 655-49870-421200
5/6/14 Arctic Glacier - re-sale 64.18 05/15/2014 609-49750-425500
5/6/14 G & K Services - inv #1043680558 floor mat cleaning 64.06 05/15/2014 609-49754-431990
5/6/14 Royal Tire - Tender 3 right rear dual-valve stem leak repair 35.50 05/15/2014 101-42200-440500
5/6/14 CPE Link - materials-"Auditing Developments" 99.00 05/15/2014 101-41520-421990
5/6/14 MN Dept of Labor & Ind - license renewal - D.J.H. 110.00 05/15/2014 101-42400-443700
5/6/14 Streichers -(7)pr boots ATAC shield w/side zip (Cargill to reimb 2,160.00 05/15/2014 101-42200-115030
5/6/14 Spirit Comm - C.A.L.E.A. 4/1-4/30/14 656.37 05/15/2014 655-49870-431970
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - March 2014 31,504.27 05/15/2014 101-43230-431000
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - March 2014 10,522.74 05/15/2014 101-43230-431010
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - March 2014 102.81 05/15/2014 655-49870-431000
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - March 2014 34.34 05/15/2014 655-49870-431010
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - March 2014 35.80 05/15/2014 101-43127-431000
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - March 2014 83.16 05/15/2014 101-45201-431000
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - March 2014 113.39 05/15/2014 602-49480-431000
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - March 2014 208.87 05/15/2014 226-45122-431000
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - March 2014 11.93 05/15/2014 101-45501-431990
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - March 2014 23.86 05/15/2014 609-49754-431000
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - March 2014 10.55 05/15/2014 213-46522-431000
5/6/14 Allina Health System - medical directorship 1,013.65 05/15/2014 101-42200-431990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 11:27 AM)Page 2
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - (4) addresses - rebill 190.00 05/15/2014 101-43230-431000
5/6/14 Advanced Disposal - (4) addresses - rebill 202.65 05/15/2014 101-43230-431000
5/6/14 NBP - inv 609724-0 (10) pk 250 sheets 8-1/2x11 white cover stock 86.80 05/15/2014 655-49870-420300
5/6/14 NBP - inv # 702089-0 (1) bx Purell sanitizing hand wipes 6.42 05/15/2014 101-41940-421990
5/6/14 NBP - inv 702089-0 (1) bx red waste bag;(1) bx 5.5 envelope; ect 52.91 05/15/2014 101-41940-420990
5/6/14 NBP - inv 699592-0 (1) ct each-teaspoons; ppr towel; plate; ect 166.13 05/15/2014 101-41940-421990
5/6/14 NBP - inv 699592-0 (2) dz assorted highlighters; (1) bx folders 25.17 05/15/2014 101-41940-420990
5/6/14 NBP - inv 704071-0 (80) rm copy paper 268.00 05/15/2014 101-41940-420300
5/6/14 NBP - inv 704071-0 (4) 25/pk 11x17 pouch; (1) dz lgl pad; ect. 108.96 05/15/2014 101-41940-420990
5/6/14 NBP - inv 705483-0 (1) digtl auto recorder; (25) rpt cover 152.24 05/15/2014 101-41940-420990
5/6/14 Auto Value Monticello - (1) color grade meduim 1 22.99 05/15/2014 101-43127-421510
5/6/14 Fastenal - (10) 1/2"x5" ZincHex Lag; (8) 1/2x5 LDT 15.18 05/15/2014 101-43120-422600
5/6/14 Fastenal - (2) 1G open stock lube can 56.81 05/15/2014 101-45201-422100
5/6/14 Fastenal - (200) disp foam ear plugs 37.10 05/15/2014 101-43127-420650
5/6/14 O Reilly - (1) W/M nozzle; (1) vac connect (1/2) 10.24 05/15/2014 601-49440-421990
5/6/14 O Reilly - (1) W/M nozzle; (1) vac connect (1/2) 10.24 05/15/2014 602-49490-421990
5/6/14 Walmart - (2) 4cp meas cup; (2) pail 6.31 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 Walmart - (3) cupcake 18.00 05/15/2014 226-45127-421460
5/6/14 Walmart - (5) batteries 29.23 05/15/2014 226-45122-421990
5/6/14 Walmart - re-sale 33.05 05/15/2014 226-45127-425410
5/6/14 SuperAmerica - (6.769) gallons G.D. 24.09 05/15/2014 217-41990-421200
5/6/14 Cub - (1) pk Energizr batteries 6.40 05/15/2014 601-49440-422990
5/6/14 Zep - locker rooms-(1) hydro sprayer 512 108.82 05/15/2014 226-45122-421990
5/6/14 NCH Corp dba Dyna -(300) washers; (10)cap screw six shooter; ect 111.76 05/15/2014 101-43127-421990
5/6/14 Home Depot - Womens restroom-(2) 4pk mirror mount clips; ect. 32.01 05/15/2014 226-45122-422300
5/6/14 Home Depot - Womens restroom-sink repair supplies 31.37 05/15/2014 226-45122-422300
5/6/14 Gradys - generator-(1) g distilled water 3.98 05/15/2014 101-42200-421990
5/6/14 utx - Gradys - 6ft table & spray gun play feature-repair parts 19.63 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 Gradys - projector project-repair parts 2.92 05/15/2014 101-45201-422300
5/6/14 utx - Gradys - table-repair parts 5.54 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 Monticello NAPA - #119 oil seal 6.55 05/15/2014 101-43120-422110
5/6/14 Monticello NAPA - (1) hyd hose fitting 9.36 05/15/2014 101-43125-422100
5/6/14 Monticello NAPA - (2) gear 8 121.78 05/15/2014 101-43127-421990
5/6/14 Monticello NAPA - #112-(18) hydraulic hose; (2) hyd hose fitting 95.32 05/15/2014 101-43127-422110
5/6/14 Monticello NAPA - (6) oil dry 49.25 05/15/2014 101-43127-421990
5/6/14 Home Depot - (1) 6V 4AH emergency exit sign battery 21.86 05/15/2014 101-42200-422990
5/6/14 Home Depot - (1) 128oz Simple Green Pro; (1) 24oz Clorox Gel 17.50 05/15/2014 101-42200-421100
5/6/14 OfficeMax - (1) pk 25 fldr hang ltr 1/3-tabs 10.79 05/15/2014 101-42200-420990
5/6/14 Wall Street Journal - monthly subscription 26.99 05/15/2014 101-41520-443300
5/6/14 Home Depot - projector project-repair parts 25.94 05/15/2014 101-45201-422300
5/6/14 Verizon - (1) Case Nite Ize Cargo pouch - P.F. 24.04 05/15/2014 226-45122-420990
5/6/14 utx - Old Time Wooden Nickel Co - Farmers Mkt (1000) tokens 201.64 05/15/2014 226-45127-421780
5/6/14 Monticello Tire & Auto - mow trailer-(2) tires; mount/bal; ect. 226.42 05/15/2014 101-45201-422200
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 11:27 AM)Page 3
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
5/6/14 H & L Mesabi - (4) 1"x1"x8" Kencast wing wear bar 283.32 05/15/2014 101-43125-422460
5/6/14 Walmart - (1) Showoff tool box 5.31 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 Walmart - assorted cleaning supplies 23.89 05/15/2014 226-45203-421990
5/6/14 Walmart - re-sale 43.54 05/15/2014 226-45127-425410
5/6/14 Walmart - assorted cleaning supplies 23.77 05/15/2014 226-45122-421100
5/6/14 USPS - (1) 100 roll stamps 49.00 05/15/2014 101-43110-432200
5/6/14 Home Depot - Womens restroom-repair parts; ect. 125.85 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 AmeriPride - inv(s) 2200496565 &2200499286 uniform rental 36.50 05/15/2014 226-45122-441700
5/6/14 AmeriPride - inv(s) 2200496565 &2200499286 laundry services 139.25 05/15/2014 226-45122-431110
5/6/14 AmeriPride - inv(s) 2200496565 &2200499286 towel rental 40.76 05/15/2014 226-45122-441710
5/6/14 utx - Spectrum Supply - (1) cs 1000c teaspoon; (1) bx 500c straw 22.39 05/15/2014 226-45127-425410
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply - concession sale supplies 101.50 05/15/2014 226-45127-425410
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply - HipVac (1) exhaust cable; (1) belt buckle 49.16 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply - foam wash; wipes; tissue; ect. 770.55 05/15/2014 226-45122-421990
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply - assorted cleaning supplies 366.88 05/15/2014 226-45122-421100
5/6/14 G & K Services - inv 1043691184 floor mat cleaning 142.62 05/15/2014 609-49754-431990
5/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - (14) lights 4489 School Blvd 193.90 05/15/2014 101-43160-431900
5/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - 3/16-4/15/14 (30) lights School Blvd 415.50 05/15/2014 101-43160-431900
5/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - 3/16-4/15/14 (9) lights 7th St & Highland 90.00 05/15/2014 101-43160-431900
5/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - 3/16-4/15/14 Cedar St Dundas to Chelsea 124.65 05/15/2014 101-43160-431900
5/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - 3/16-4/15/14 Chelsea Rd E 180.00 05/15/2014 101-43160-431900
5/6/14 Wright Henn Elec - 3/16-4/15/14 School Bblvd Fenning/18/Edmon 372.00 05/15/2014 101-43160-431900
5/6/14 Central McGowan - bulk C2o 68.93 05/15/2014 226-45122-421600
5/6/14 utx - Central McGowan - bulk C2o freight 21.50 05/15/2014 226-45122-421600
5/6/14 Central McGowan - monthly rental fee 48.09 05/15/2014 226-45122-441500
5/6/14 United Laboratories - (12) ten strikes 302.49 05/15/2014 101-45201-420650
5/6/14 MN Dept of Health - permit #575993 & #575994 909 Golf Course Rd 100.00 05/15/2014 602-49490-443700
5/6/14 MN Dept of Health - permit #589304 Fire Station 50.00 05/15/2014 101-42200-443700
5/6/14 Aramark - uniform rental 100.19 05/15/2014 101-45201-441700
5/6/14 Aramark - uniform rental 45.37 05/15/2014 602-49490-441700
5/6/14 Aramark - uniform rental 45.37 05/15/2014 601-49440-441700
5/6/14 Aramark - uniform rental 141.43 05/15/2014 101-43120-441700
5/6/14 Aramark - towel rental 106.50 05/15/2014 101-43127-421990
5/6/14 Hawkins - chemical product 7,341.88 05/15/2014 601-49440-421600
5/6/14 Unique Paving - 1.90 ton #2 winter cold mix 717.50 05/15/2014 101-43120-422400
5/6/14 (1) conveyor chain 1,278.10 05/15/2014 101-43125-422100
5/6/14 Flexible Pipe - (1) penetrating nozzle 75.40 05/15/2014 602-49490-421990
5/6/14 Flexible Pipe - (1) coupling adaptor, (2) rd adaptors, ect 1,006.15 05/15/2014 602-49490-422100
5/6/14 Corporate Connection - (40) safety vests 240.00 05/15/2014 101-43120-420650
5/6/14 Corporate Connection - (3) safety vests 18.00 05/15/2014 601-49440-420650
5/6/14 Corporate Connection - (3) safety vests 18.00 05/15/2014 602-49490-420650
5/6/14 Corporate Connection - (25) safety vests 150.00 05/15/2014 101-45201-420650
5/6/14 Audio Communications - #145 & #229 - radio units 1,316.00 05/15/2014 703-00000-165010
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 11:27 AM)Page 4
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
5/6/14 utx - Rivers Edge Conv Center - parking (Food Expo) 5.00 05/15/2014 226-45122-433100
5/6/14 Home Depot - (1) SDS rotary hammer; (1) carbide bit; (1) chisel 243.08 05/15/2014 656-49877-421990
5/6/14 Home Depot - (11) 10' SCH40; (1) anchor kit; (1) hole saw; ect. 97.61 05/15/2014 656-49877-421990
5/6/14 SurveyMonkey - 4/23/14-15 204.00 05/15/2014 101-41940-421990
5/6/14 DISH - 5/2-6/1/14 digital music 56.64 05/15/2014 609-49754-432500
5/6/14 Arctic Glacier - inv(s) 425410410 & 425411108 197.44 05/15/2014 609-49750-425500
5/6/14 Monticello City of - ROW permit 25.00 05/15/2014 656-49877-443700
5/6/14 Radioshack - (1) Gigaware DB9M-DB9M gender chan 10.41 05/15/2014 655-49870-421990
5/6/14 Dell - (6) Dell 16 GB replacement memory module 1,731.31 05/15/2014 655-49870-421990
5/6/14 GFOA - 2014 budget app 330.00 05/15/2014 101-41520-443990
5/6/14 Beacon Athletics - 1 Relase Base;1 Mat Drag; 20 tarp stakes 610.97 05/15/2014 101-45203-421990
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply -2 dozen ea #163 Cowhide Driver XL & LG 264.96 05/15/2014 101-43120-420650
5/6/14 MacQueen Equipment - #108 - (1) Hydraulic Motor M.B. 933.84 05/15/2014 101-43120-422100
5/6/14 Red's Service - #225 fuel 42.73 05/15/2014 101-43120-421200
5/6/14 Holiday - #621 Snowplow 2238.4 hrs (31.574) gallons 125.00 05/15/2014 101-43120-421200
5/6/14 NAPA - shop supplies: air, oil, & fuel filters 368.35 05/15/2014 101-43127-422120
5/6/14 Grady's Hardware - #116 tanker hose -1 nipple; 1 coupling 13.48 05/15/2014 101-43120-422100
5/6/14 H & L Mesabi - (2) loader blade; (2) curb runner 977.02 05/15/2014 101-43125-422460
5/6/14 Enviro Equip - 132B; clamp/shim -leaf bleeder; cable 108"; screw 108.96 05/15/2014 101-43120-422100
5/6/14 Martie's - 50# Blvd. Seed - Prem. Sunny 101.00 05/15/2014 101-43120-422500
5/6/14 Grady's - (1)Torpedo magnetic level; (1)1"x25' rule tape 24.98 05/15/2014 101-43120-421990
5/6/14 Holiday Stationstore 196 - DMV fuel; 8.89 gallons 32.00 05/15/2014 217-41990-421200
5/6/14 Home Depot - MCC storage shelf in warehouse 191.31 05/15/2014 226-45127-421720
5/6/14 Home Depot - MCC garden 50.88 05/15/2014 226-45127-421980
5/6/14 Home Depot - MCC F. Market 5.63 05/15/2014 226-45127-421780
5/6/14 Home Depot - MCC maintenance supplies 50.56 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 AmeriPride - Uniform Rental 18.25 05/15/2014 226-45122-441700
5/6/14 AmeriPride - Laudry Services 69.94 05/15/2014 226-45122-431110
5/6/14 AmeriPride - Towel Rental 20.38 05/15/2014 226-45122-441710
5/6/14 Walmart - Return of 5 gal jug -24.45 05/15/2014 226-45127-421980
5/6/14 Fastenal - (3) orange flagging tape 2.55 05/15/2014 101-45201-421990
5/6/14 Fastenal - (400) pair eag plugs 74.20 05/15/2014 101-43127-420650
5/6/14 Napa - (2) hose fittings, (11) hydraulic ho (compactor) 110.51 05/15/2014 101-43127-422100
5/6/14 Napa - brake fluid 20.39 05/15/2014 101-43127-421300
5/6/14 (20) meters 2,200.00 05/15/2014 601-49440-422710
5/6/14 Biffs - 3/5/14 thru 4/1/14 public works & 3 parks 147.08 05/15/2014 101-45201-443990
5/6/14 Water Laboratories - water testing March 2014 150.00 05/15/2014 601-49440-422740
5/6/14 NBP - (7) calc ribbons 13.93 05/15/2014 217-41990-420990
5/6/14 MacQueen - (1) chain kit (augers, chain, ect) 2,502.10 05/15/2014 101-43125-422100
5/6/14 Horizon Pool - pool chemical product 1,023.65 05/15/2014 226-45122-421600
5/6/14 All-Ways Heating - labor park/rec shed heater 180.00 05/15/2014 101-45201-440440
5/6/14 Holiday - motor fuel (#215 bobcat) 80.00 05/15/2014 101-45201-421200
5/6/14 Reds - motor fuel #117 60.00 05/15/2014 101-45201-421200
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 11:27 AM)Page 5
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
5/6/14 Gradys - (8) 24oz bowl cleaner 23.92 05/15/2014 601-49440-421990
5/6/14 Gradys - screws, screwdriver 5.69 05/15/2014 101-43120-421990
5/6/14 Home Depot - cedar, pine, nails, ect 169.13 05/15/2014 101-43120-422500
5/6/14 Napa - (6) chain cables 35.34 05/15/2014 101-43127-421500
5/6/14 Zarnoth - (2) broom refills (toro & JD brooms) 761.20 05/15/2014 101-45201-422100
5/6/14 Zarnoth - cable wrap broom refill 448.00 05/15/2014 101-43120-422100
5/6/14 utx -Flagship Merch Serv-Fmr's Mkt-wireless terminal (DHS reimb) 604.00 05/15/2014 226-45127-421780
5/6/14 Holiday Stationstore 196 - DMV fuel; 8.152 gallons 28.52 05/15/2014 217-41990-421200
5/6/14 M & M Express - #226 & #228 - (7) blades; (2) whip head 191.15 05/15/2014 101-45201-422100
5/6/14 RM Cotton Co - K & N air filter for high efficiency boiler 121.41 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 utx - Home Depot - plywd; scrws; hngers;studs;fitness-closet WH 65.93 05/15/2014 226-45122-440100
5/6/14 Home Depot - electrical plugs for vac's etc. equipment 35.08 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 utx - Gradys - paint supplies for gym & warehouse 16.48 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 Home Depot - (1) mail box; 4x4-8ft cedar: (1) Painters Touch 37.18 05/15/2014 101-43120-421990
5/6/14 Walmart - Concession Food 43.24 05/15/2014 226-45203-425410
5/6/14 Walmart - Concession Bug Spray 15.94 05/15/2014 226-45203-421450
5/6/14 Walmart - Concession Food 6.88 05/15/2014 226-45127-425410
5/6/14 Walmart - Operating supplies 13.85 05/15/2014 226-45122-421990
5/6/14 Gradys - mail boxes; numbers - 33 pc 2" blk & wht 3.99 05/15/2014 101-43120-421990
5/6/14 Cub - re-sale 37.87 05/15/2014 609-49750-425500
5/6/14 Gradys - (1) anchor #8 wallbd; (1) rib anchor 8-10-12WSCCD6 5.00 05/15/2014 656-49877-421990
5/6/14 SuperAm - (29.765) gallons unit 1 - B.N. 103.25 05/15/2014 655-49870-421200
5/6/14 SLUC - Shakopee on the Move! 4/30/14 Bloomington-A.S.; R.L. 76.00 05/15/2014 213-46301-433200
5/6/14 Nextel - 3/13-4/12/14 29.04 05/15/2014 101-43111-432100
5/6/14 Nextel - 3/13-4/12/14 29.04 05/15/2014 601-49440-432100
5/6/14 Nextel - 3/13-4/12/14 29.04 05/15/2014 602-49490-432100
5/6/14 Nextel - 3/13-4/12/14 17.29 05/15/2014 655-49870-432100
5/6/14 utx - Nextel - 3/13-4/12/14 11.76 05/15/2014 655-49870-432100
5/6/14 Monticello NAPA - #115 (3) adapters 2.49 05/15/2014 101-43120-422110
5/6/14 Gradys - mail boxes - 3 bolts 5/16'x3'; link chain 3/16" 4.74 05/15/2014 101-43120-422990
5/6/14 Monticello NAPA - #115 brake line 3.24 05/15/2014 101-43120-422100
5/6/14 Monticello NAPA - (2) Wheel cyc re 5.98 05/15/2014 101-43120-422110
5/6/14 Monticello NAPA - (2) Napagold air filter 21.84 05/15/2014 101-43127-422120
5/6/14 Monticello NAPA - #115 (1) front wheel seal 15.50 05/15/2014 101-43120-422110
5/6/14 Monti NAPA - #115 net return (1) oil seal; purchase (1) oil bath 19.32 05/15/2014 101-43120-422110
5/6/14 Cub - forks, bowls, plates, tissue, bags 25.79 05/15/2014 101-43127-421990
5/6/14 Fastenal - (17) 1/2x5 LDT; crosswalks on School Blvd 20.10 05/15/2014 101-43120-422600
5/6/14 Fastenal - (1) rubber gloves - washing sidewalks 6.36 05/15/2014 101-43120-420650
5/6/14 Titan Machinery - #103 & #104 - (2) seal kit, gland, freight in 271.09 05/15/2014 101-43120-422100
5/6/14 Monticello NAPA - #115 - oil bath, oil seal, whl cylinder, needl 259.69 05/15/2014 101-43120-422110
5/6/14 AH Hermel - misc food items for concession 394.68 05/15/2014 226-45203-425410
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply - (2)mops;1-wall block; 2-bow brush; 2-liners; 158.28 05/15/2014 101-45201-421990
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply - misc; soap, cups, towel,detergent;bags, gloves 340.27 05/15/2014 101-45201-421650
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 11:27 AM)Page 6
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply -1dz #163 LG cowhide drvr;1dz XL cowhide drvr 132.48 05/15/2014 101-45201-420650
5/6/14 Wigen - water softener repair; misc parts/labor 2,192.71 05/15/2014 226-45122-440440
5/6/14 Genereux Fine Wood Prod - new sink counter in MCC womens bathrm 2,628.75 05/15/2014 226-45122-440100
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply - misc MCC user hygiene products 260.62 05/15/2014 226-45122-421990
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply - vac. motor 185.71 05/15/2014 226-45122-422100
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply - cleaning supplies 357.29 05/15/2014 226-45122-421100
5/6/14 Spectrum Supply - Ballfields; 1000 .10/ cup 16 oz 97.16 05/15/2014 226-45203-425410
5/6/14 Echostar Satellite - DISH Network - MCC Pmnt 4/24 cc 80.16 05/15/2014 226-45122-432500
5/6/14 JH Larson Co - MCC light bulbs; 12-26w fluorescent lamps 84.69 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 utx - Gradys - misc keys 11.94 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 utx - Gradys - cleaners; brush 12.07 05/15/2014 226-45122-421100
5/6/14 Specialty Turf & AG - (120) Mound Master red clay bricks 4,353.75 05/15/2014 101-45203-421990
5/6/14 US Postal Service - postage; DMV stamps 5.80 05/15/2014 217-41990-432200
5/6/14 G & K Services - floor mats 60.00 05/15/2014 217-41990-431990
5/6/14 Pier ZZBCOL- Midway Iron - (12) 20' steel 385.08 05/15/2014 229-45202-453010
5/6/14 Midway Iron - (2) 20' round bar hot roll 287.30 05/15/2014 101-43127-421520
5/6/14 J H Larson - vac & appliance cords 112.27 05/15/2014 226-45122-422100
5/6/14 Monticello Napa - #115 - (1) brake lin (850) 3.24 05/15/2014 101-43120-422100
5/6/14 Napa - (2) qt gear lub (unit #222) 13.72 05/15/2014 101-45201-422100
5/6/14 Menards - (2) reach tools (grabbers) 6.42 05/15/2014 101-45201-421990
5/6/14 utx - Monticello Vacuum - (4) vac bags 71.80 05/15/2014 226-45122-421100
5/6/14 Target - electronics-(4) ENR premium 55.16 05/15/2014 101-41940-421990
5/6/14 Northstar Chapter APA - membership thru 1/1/15 - R.C. 50.00 05/15/2014 101-41520-443300
5/6/14 OfficeMax - (1) BRTH LT blc on ylw 1/2"; (1) BRTH LT 1/2" 2P 66.98 05/15/2014 101-42200-420990
5/6/14 Home Depot - (10) X-Factor eyewear yellow SF4 99.70 05/15/2014 101-42200-421990
5/6/14 Cub - re-sale 15.38 05/15/2014 609-49750-425500
5/6/14 Cub - re-sale 56.93 05/15/2014 609-49750-425500
5/6/14 GFOA - refund for 2 pre-conference classes - A.M.-240.00 05/15/2014 101-41520-433200
5/6/14 Best Buy - ZZZNEP - (1) laptop; (1) micro HDMI cable; 489.98 05/15/2014 101-42500-421990
5/6/14 Amazon.com - (2) books 57.54 05/15/2014 101-41520-421990
5/6/14 Amazon.com - (1) 30 pk MagicFiber microfiber cleaning cloths 25.47 05/15/2014 101-41940-420990
5/6/14 NBP - inv 707298-1 (2) ct roll thermal 3 1/8" x 230' 116.50 05/15/2014 609-49754-421990
5/6/14 NBP - inv 707298-0 (2) ct roll thermal 3 1/8" x 230' 116.49 05/15/2014 609-49754-421990
5/6/14 USPS -(1) Ffirst class mail letter certified return rcpt 6.49 05/15/2014 101-41310-432200
5/6/14 Fire Safety USA - (2) G-Force replacemt nozzles - E4 & L1 1,058.06 05/15/2014 101-42200-422110
5/6/14 utx - Google apps - calendar app 70.00 05/15/2014 655-49870-421990
5/6/14 NBP - inv 700787-0 (40) rm copy paper 134.00 05/15/2014 217-41990-420300
5/6/14 NBP - inv700787-0 (2)pk add mach ppr; (1) ink stamp refill; ect. 52.16 05/15/2014 217-41990-420990
5/6/14 NBP - inv 708913-0 (1) ct plastic knife 40.98 05/15/2014 101-41940-421990
5/6/14 NBP - inv 708913-0 (2) monitor stand 54.98 05/15/2014 101-41940-420990
5/6/14 utx - Gradys - (1) lock entry; (2) keyblank 19.97 05/15/2014 101-45172-443990
5/6/14 Kiwk Trip - (12.58) gallons unit 3 B.W. 44.65 05/15/2014 655-49870-421200
5/6/14 Home Depot - (4) 8 pk D batteries 42.62 05/15/2014 656-49877-421990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 11:27 AM)Page 7
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
5/6/14 Holiday - (30.191) gallons unit 2 D.S. 108.66 05/15/2014 655-49870-421200
5/6/14 utx - Home Depot - (9) brass door stops 53.73 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 Home Depot - reimb (advanced disp) mail box 42.72 05/15/2014 226-45122-349990
5/6/14 Home Depot - wire brush, scrub brush, ect 146.67 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
5/6/14 My Tarp - (2) 6'x50' fence screen, (1) 10' round tarp 320.83 05/15/2014 101-45203-421990
5/6/14 Home Depot - caulk, cut brush, siding (welcome signs) 36.64 05/15/2014 101-45201-421990
5/6/14 Home Depot - siding return -22.72 05/15/2014 101-45201-421990
5/6/14 Home Depot - drywall screw gun 99.00 05/15/2014 101-45201-421990
5/6/14 Home Depot - ladder, steel, ect 474.71 05/15/2014 101-43127-424100
5/6/14 Home Depot - supplies (warehouse project MCC) 105.98 05/15/2014 226-45122-422300
5/6/14 utx - Home Depot -drywall, hammer bits, ect (warehouse proj MCC) 100.41 05/15/2014 226-45122-422300
5/6/14 Ferguson - (38) water meters 4,513.98 05/15/2014 601-49440-422701
5/6/14 Ferguson - (1) wm crgr 850 (split) 61.12 05/15/2014 601-49440-422100
5/6/14 Ferguson - (1) wm crgr 850 (split) 61.12 05/15/2014 602-49490-422100
5/6/14 Auto Value - (1) 8" stikit pad (welcome signs) 44.99 05/15/2014 101-45201-421990
5/6/14 Cub - (4) Folgers coffee 41.54 05/15/2014 101-43127-443990
5/6/14 utx - Verizon Wireless - 320-241-3917; 763-688-5387 2/21-3/20/14 61.03 05/15/2014 655-49870-432100
5/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 763-954-1070 2/21-3/20/14 26.02 05/15/2014 101-43120-432100
5/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 763-688-5936 2/21-3/20/14 34.38 05/15/2014 101-43115-432100
5/6/14 Hi-way Liquor - Spring Wine Tasting gift card prizes 200.00 05/15/2014 609-49750-425550
5/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 3/4-4/3/14 99.28 05/15/2014 101-42400-432100
5/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 3/4-4/3/14 31.05 05/15/2014 101-43115-432100
5/6/14 utx - Verizon Wireless - 3/4-4/3/14 198.40 05/15/2014 655-49870-432100
5/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 3/4-4/3/14 3.36 05/15/2014 655-49870-432100
5/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 3/4-4/3/14 2.52 05/15/2014 226-45122-432100
5/6/14 utx - Verizon Wireless - 3/4-4/3/14 123.01 05/15/2014 226-45122-432100
5/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 3/4-4/3/14 41.05 05/15/2014 101-45201-432100
5/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 3/4-4/3/14 104.48 05/15/2014 101-43120-432100
5/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 3/4-4/3/14 (1/2) 76.80 05/15/2014 601-49440-432100
5/6/14 Verizon Wireless - 3/4-4/3/14 (1/2) 76.79 05/15/2014 602-49490-432100
5/6/14 Titan - #117 - (5) strobe bulbs 343.77 05/15/2014 101-43120-422100
5/6/14 Titan - #117 - (sales tx adjust from 4/30 invoice)-22.12 05/15/2014 101-43120-422100
5/6/14 MAC Tools - air tools (shop) 99.99 05/15/2014 101-45201-421990
5/6/14 MAC Tools - 5pc filter socket set 55.99 05/15/2014 101-43127-421990
5/6/14 utx - NBP - note paper, security box, lam pouch, ect 67.85 05/15/2014 226-45122-420990
5/6/14 utx - NBP - security safe 47.60 05/15/2014 226-45127-421780
5/6/14 utx - NBP - (2) rm copy paper 9.18 05/15/2014 226-45122-420990
5/6/14 NBP - (2) rm copy paper 14.94 05/15/2014 226-45122-420990
5/6/14 NBP - (1) chair mat 40.61 05/15/2014 226-45122-420990
5/6/14 NBP - (1) wall calendar, (1) dz gel pens 34.21 05/15/2014 226-45122-420990
5/6/14 General Rental - 20lb propane fill 23.00 05/15/2014 101-43127-421990
5/6/14 Gradys - (1) refillable lighter, (1) butane fuel 10.78 05/15/2014 101-43120-421990
5/6/14 Gradys - 3oz household oil, plastic anchors (fitness equip) 9.39 05/15/2014 226-45122-422990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 11:27 AM)Page 8
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
5/6/14 Titan - #163 - (2) cs flexible hose 162.20 05/15/2014 101-43120-422100
5/6/14 utx - General Rental - co2 for bar & keg mister 31.50 05/15/2014 226-45127-420750
5/6/14 Constant Contact - monthly email program use fee 50.00 05/15/2014 226-45122-430920
5/6/14 Walmart - zone bars, bananas 63.09 05/15/2014 226-45127-425410
5/6/14 Walmart - cupcakes, sandwiches 26.89 05/15/2014 226-45127-421460
5/6/14 Walmart - swim pants 49.85 05/15/2014 226-45127-425490
5/6/14 RecSupply - splash/slam rim, 6 balls 126.00 05/15/2014 226-45127-421750
5/6/14 RecSupply - (24) whistles & lanyards 85.77 05/15/2014 226-45122-421990
5/6/14 Zep -(5) gal degreaser, (1) dz zep 40 321.96 05/15/2014 101-43127-421100
5/6/14 Morries Buffalo Ford-seat covers 2 rows; under seat storage; ect 378.00 05/15/2014 101-43120-421990
5/6/14 Weebly.com - website hosting 99.00 05/15/2014 226-45122-430920
5/6/14 NBP - (10) rm copy paper 33.50 05/15/2014 226-45122-420990
5/6/14 MN DVS - (credit card test machines down) 1.00 05/15/2014 217-41990-443990
5/6/14 MN DVS - (credit card test machines down) 0.02 05/15/2014 217-41990-443990
5/6/14 Pier - ZZBCOL - (2) dock floats, (1) dock anchor 1,373.00 05/15/2014 229-45202-453010
5/6/14 Best Vacuum - (1) cansiter vac, (1) backpack vac 762.14 05/15/2014 226-45122-424600
5/6/14 NIHCA - fitness training conference 99.00 05/15/2014 226-45122-433200
5/6/14 River Bend Industries - shop supplies 47.84 05/15/2014 101-43127-421990
5/6/14 Walmart-fraudulent transaction to be credited on 6/6/14 statemt 127.49 05/15/2014 101-41520-443990
110,314.14Check Total:
Vendor:2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True
00006050521 Vanco Fitness Rewards April 2014 95.50 05/15/2014 226-45122-430700
00006052329 Gateway transaction/program fees April 2014 735.30 05/15/2014 655-49870-443980
00006052329 Gateway transaction/program fees April 2014 14.70 05/15/2014 601-49440-443980
00006052329 Gateway transaction/program fees April 2014 14.70 05/15/2014 602-49490-443980
860.20Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
185,341.20
7
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 11:27 AM)Page 9
The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment.
Date: 5/27/14 Approved by: _____________________________________
Mayor Clint Herbst
User:
Printed:05/21/2014 - 12:28PM
Ann.Zimmerman
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch:00205.05.2014 - 00205052014 AP
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1835 A H HERMEL COMPANY Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False
432281 re-sale 42.82 05/28/2014 226-45203-425410
42.82Check Total:
Vendor:1008 ACOUSTICS ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False
139555 utx - Materials - repair Miss & Bridge partition walls 418.00 05/28/2014 226-45122-440440
139555 Labor - repair Miss & Bridge partition walls 1,033.50 05/28/2014 226-45122-440440
1,451.50Check Total:
Vendor:3737 ACTIVE911 INC Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False
2202 (28) 12 month subscription - fire responders app 308.00 05/28/2014 101-42200-421990
308.00Check Total:
Vendor:2840 AGER INC Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 001-0574 99.07 05/28/2014 655-00000-115025
99.07Check Total:
Vendor:1020 ALMCO HYDRAULICS INC Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False
16375 Preventative mtc inspection/baler 139.00 05/28/2014 609-49754-431990
16376 (1) 2 spool bx - bale twine 122.91 05/28/2014 609-49754-421990
261.91Check Total:
Vendor:1038 APPERTS FOOD SERVICE Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False
405020621 freight 5.00 05/28/2014 226-45122-433300
405020621 party room 65.54 05/28/2014 226-45127-421460
405020621 re-sale 335.69 05/28/2014 226-45127-425410
405030107 party room 125.58 05/28/2014 226-45127-421460
405030107 re-sale 102.68 05/28/2014 226-45127-425410
405090663 re-sale 263.36 05/28/2014 226-45203-425410
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
405090664 freight 5.00 05/28/2014 226-45122-433300
405090664 re-sale 513.57 05/28/2014 226-45127-425410
405160760 freight 5.00 05/28/2014 226-45122-433300
405160760 re-sale 902.74 05/28/2014 226-45127-425410
405160760 party room - pizzas 79.07 05/28/2014 226-45127-421460
2,403.23Check Total:
Vendor:3723 DOUG AND SHARON BACKSTROM Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 763-295-2176 24.88 05/28/2014 655-00000-115025
24.88Check Total:
Vendor:1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True
42938000 re sale 304.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
42938000 re sale 1,673.61 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
42938000 freight 25.65 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
43036000 re sale 318.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
43036000 re sale 1,196.76 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
43036000 freight 22.19 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
90142700 re sale 176.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
90142700 freight 1.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
90142700 (2) 500 bag 43.30 05/28/2014 609-49754-421990
90177100 freight 0.55 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
90177100 re sale 120.85 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
3,881.91Check Total:
Vendor:1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False
100983 re-sale 517.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-425410
100983 party room 6.40 05/28/2014 226-45127-421460
103258 re sale 16.40 05/28/2014 609-49750-425500
103258 re sale 82.50 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
103259 re sale 397.90 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
22049 party room 12.80 05/28/2014 226-45127-421460
22049 re-sale 243.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-425410
22068 re-sale 326.00 05/28/2014 226-45203-425410
24380 re sale 49.20 05/28/2014 609-49750-425500
24380 re sale 49.80 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
24381 re sale 952.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
25060 re-sale 587.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-425410
3,240.00Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 2
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:2221 BIG TEN NETWORK LLC Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True
G93895 Big 10 April 2014 1,400.82 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
1,400.82Check Total:
Vendor:3724 CASSIE BLANCHARD Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 001-0890 14.48 05/28/2014 655-00000-115025
14.48Check Total:
Vendor:2535 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True
907307993 Splitter - (25) 3 way; (25) 4 way 93.66 05/28/2014 656-49877-421990
93.66Check Total:
Vendor:2047 BRIDGE WATER TELEPHONE COMPANY Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True
665FNMT-S-14133 Voice - monthly access charges interstate 5/13-6/12/14 415.14 05/28/2014 655-49860-430910
415.14Check Total:
Vendor:1089 SARA CAHILL Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True
5/5/14 Reimb (Sam's Club) (1) canopy; (1) 5' table (Reimb from grant $) 257.31 05/28/2014 226-45127-421780
257.31Check Total:
Vendor:1749 CALIX NETWORKS INC Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: True
1064627 utx - (4) 762GX ONT 8 POTS 8GE 4 RF 1 RFX 5,543.87 05/28/2014 656-49877-421800
5,543.87Check Total:
Vendor:1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: True
2348-001G80 Code Enforcement 202.52 05/28/2014 101-42400-430400
2348-103G82 Fiber/Broadband project 1,260.00 05/28/2014 655-49870-430400
2348-126G1 ZGOODW - 493.00 05/28/2014 101-00000-220110
1,955.52Check Total:
Vendor:1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False
5/12/14 5863599-6 80.17 05/28/2014 101-42700-438300
5/12/14 5804618-6 12.59 05/28/2014 101-45201-438300
92.76Check Total:
Vendor:1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False
00019551 Monthly facility fee 48.09 05/28/2014 226-45122-441500
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 3
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
00786194 99.93 05/28/2014 226-45122-421600
00786194 utx - delivery charge 21.50 05/28/2014 226-45122-421600
169.52Check Total:
Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False
L04003703714121 Voice - usage billing cycle 4/1-4/30/14 136.59 05/28/2014 655-49860-430910
R72010610614121 Voice - 5/1-5/31/14 monthly access charges - intrastate 600.00 05/28/2014 655-49860-430910
R97006006014121 Voice - 5/1-5/31/14 monthly access charges - interstate; ect 143.25 05/28/2014 655-49860-430910
879.84Check Total:
Vendor:1092 CSI SOFTWARE INC Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True
22289 utx - 6/1/14-5/31/15 (20%) Annual support 692.12 05/28/2014 226-45122-430910
22289 6/1/14-5/31/15 (80%) Annual support 2,768.48 05/28/2014 226-45122-430910
22289 6/1/14-5/31/15 Credit card processing service 780.00 05/28/2014 226-45122-430910
22289 5/1/14 Credit card compliance flat fee 424.06 05/28/2014 226-45122-430910
4,664.66Check Total:
Vendor:1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True
1077532 re sale 1,221.55 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
1094417 Bal Balance owed 2.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
1103110 re sale 22,318.55 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
1103110 re sale 47.40 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
1103142 re sale 996.60 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
1103150 re sale 18,935.70 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
1103150 re sale 346.30 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
18155 Refer to inv 1094483 -44.80 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
19883 re-sale 297.00 05/28/2014 226-45203-425200
19989 re sale 246.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
19989 re sale 84.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
24143 re sale 300.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
24949 re sale 216.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
44,966.30Check Total:
Vendor:1134 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: True
105128 re sale 1,276.25 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
750683 re sale 3,143.35 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
750683 re sale 24.60 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
4,444.20Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 4
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:3306 DC GROUP INC Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: True
FS14-11642 utx -2/1/14-1/31/15-Parts/labor mtc contract for UPS & battery 1,020.00 05/28/2014 655-49870-431900
1,020.00Check Total:
Vendor:3677 CHARLES DEGRIO Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: True
5/13/14 Referee Men's Hockey - (2) games 5/7/14; (2) games 5/11/14 140.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
5/14/14 Referee Men's Hockey - (2) games 5/14/14 70.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
5/8/14 Referee Men's Hockey - (2) games 5/4/14; (3) games 5/5/14 175.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
385.00Check Total:
Vendor:1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: True
97954 ZZSEAL - Bids - 2014 Sealcoat Project 5/24/14 - 5/1/14 206.12 05/28/2014 101-43120-435100
206.12Check Total:
Vendor:1165 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE INC Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: True
73512 Eng 1 (1162) - NFPA Pump Test; Full Service Safety Inspect; ect. 929.64 05/28/2014 101-42200-440500
73513 Lad 1 (1164) - NFPA Pump Test; Full Service Safety Inspect; ect. 930.51 05/28/2014 101-42200-440500
73514 Eng 4 - NFPA Pump Test; Full Service Safety Inspect; ect. 998.74 05/28/2014 101-42200-440500
73515 Tender 1 - Full Service Safety Inspection - misc parts/labor 624.38 05/28/2014 101-42200-440500
3,483.27Check Total:
Vendor:1680 EPIC PRODUCTS INC Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False
0445766-IN re-sale 123.60 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
0445766-IN freight 28.16 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
0445766-IN re-sale - wine bags 239.40 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
391.16Check Total:
Vendor:1166 ESRI Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False
92812366 9/1/13-8/31/14 ArcGIS for Desktop/Server Workgroup/ArcPad 2,200.00 05/28/2014 101-43111-430910
2,200.00Check Total:
Vendor:1167 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False
958637 re sale 268.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
268.00Check Total:
Vendor:2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False
0078344 (2) 3/4 T10 ECDR usg 328.73 05/28/2014 601-49440-422710
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 5
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
328.73Check Total:
Vendor:3318 FIBERNET MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False
5/9/14 Bullseye 5/9/14 147.79 05/28/2014 655-49870-443980
5/9/14 Bullseye 5/9/14 interest -14.13 05/28/2014 655-00000-362990
133.66Check Total:
Vendor:2222 FOX SPORTS NET INC Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: True
G90047 Fox Sports North April 2014 4,770.17 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
4,770.17Check Total:
Vendor:2539 RICHARD FRUTH Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False
5/6/14 Lot 171 Graves 1 & 2 - purchased 1/3/11 transfer back to city 1,400.00 05/28/2014 651-49010-349410
5/6/14 Lot 171 Graves 1 & 2 - purchased 1/3/11 transfer back to city 200.00 05/28/2014 651-49010-349400
1,600.00Check Total:
Vendor:1859 GODFATHER'S EXTERMINATING INC Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: False
75780 utx - Quarterly extermination - Prairie Center 50.00 05/28/2014 101-41941-431990
75848 utx - Quarterly extermination - MCC 80.00 05/28/2014 226-45122-431990
75849 Quarterly extermination - DMV 35.00 05/28/2014 217-41990-431990
75850 Quarterly extermination - Library 50.00 05/28/2014 101-45501-431990
75851 General pest control - Liquor 58.78 05/28/2014 609-49754-431990
273.78Check Total:
Vendor:1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: True
93771 February 2014 locates (1/2) (second Feb billing) 7.35 05/28/2014 601-49440-422770
93771 February 2014 locates (1/2) (second Feb billing) 7.35 05/28/2014 656-49877-422770
14.70Check Total:
Vendor:1206 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False
166801 RE SALE 554.65 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
166801 freight 6.75 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
561.40Check Total:
Vendor:1244 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False
14040701 (1) 25lb pail filter ceaner/stain remover 138.88 05/28/2014 226-45122-421100
14050545 903.41 05/28/2014 226-45122-421600
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 6
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1,042.29Check Total:
Vendor:3356 INDIAN ISLAND WINERY Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False
1988 re-sale 275.52 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
275.52Check Total:
Vendor:1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False
2213360 re sale 1,102.80 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
1,102.80Check Total:
Vendor:1263 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False
1842100 freight 94.52 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1842100 re-sale 6,306.19 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
1842101 re sale 108.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
1842101 freight 4.17 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1842720 freight 19.57 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1842720 re sale 2,783.59 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
1842721 re sale 96.75 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
1842721 re sale 3,041.85 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
1842721 freight 88.98 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1845462 freight 66.71 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1845462 re sale 4,988.55 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
1845463 re sale 1,870.85 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
1845463 freight 44.49 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1847318 freight 15.75 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1847318 re-sale 1,042.50 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
1847319 re-sale 1,831.50 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
1847319 freight 56.99 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1848063 freight 38.22 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1848063 re sale 3,310.99 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
1848064 re sale 4,536.55 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
1848064 re sale 95.85 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
1848064 freight 115.82 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1848065 re sale 93.98 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
1850669 re sale 186.49 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
1850669 freight 1.39 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1850670 freight 23.63 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1850670 re sale 776.25 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
618681 Ref inv# 1842721 -10.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
618891 Ref inv# 1799919 -3.65 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 7
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
31,626.48Check Total:
Vendor:2251 KARE GANNETT CO INC Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False
277-1017 KARE April 2014 911.90 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
911.90Check Total:
Vendor:2626 HARRY LANTTO Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: True
5/15/14 5/14/14 EDA meeting recording 50.00 05/28/2014 213-46301-431990
5/15/14 5/6/14 Planning Comm meeting recording 50.00 05/28/2014 101-41910-431990
100.00Check Total:
Vendor:1291 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False
5/1/14 LMCIT Claim #C0027812 date of injury 12/20/13 574.36 05/28/2014 101-49240-436990
5/1/14 LMCIT Claim #C0029178 date of injury 2/6/14 420.02 05/28/2014 101-49240-436990
5/1/14 LMCIT Claim #C0029180 date of injury 2/10/14 134.00 05/28/2014 101-49240-436990
1,128.38Check Total:
Vendor:1292 LEROY JOB TRUCKING INC Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: True
16606 (9) animal charge 90.00 05/28/2014 101-42700-431990
90.00Check Total:
Vendor:3725 JIM AND CHARLOTTE LIEN Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 001-0166 5.23 05/28/2014 655-00000-115025
5.23Check Total:
Vendor:1297 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False
0223291-IN (2) 2000 each 32" Aervoe marking stick 52.88 05/28/2014 656-49877-421990
52.88Check Total:
Vendor:1303 M AMUNDSON LLP Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True
173622 re-sale 601.77 05/28/2014 609-49750-425500
173622 re-sale 223.30 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
825.07Check Total:
Vendor:1229 MAJIRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: True
1060 (2.75) hr Creative Fee - MCC Facility Brochures 233.75 05/28/2014 226-45122-435600
1060 utx - (2500) MCC Facility Brochures 467.46 05/28/2014 226-45122-435600
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 8
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
701.21Check Total:
Vendor:1314 MCDOWALL COMPANY Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False
218883 4/18/14 Cooler repair labor 490.00 05/28/2014 609-49754-440440
218946 4/21-4/24/14 Cooler repair labor & materials - new compressor 3,450.06 05/28/2014 609-49754-440440
3,940.06Check Total:
Vendor:2452 ANGIE MCINTIRE Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: True
5/8/14 Mileage/Parking reimb - 5/8/14 St Cloud Sales & Use Tax class 32.99 05/28/2014 101-41520-433100
32.99Check Total:
Vendor:1318 JONATHAN CALEB MELLBERG Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: True
4/28/14 4/28/14 City Council meeting recording 80.00 05/28/2014 101-41110-431990
5/12/14 5/14/14 City Council meeting recording 80.00 05/28/2014 101-41110-431990
160.00Check Total:
Vendor:1330 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: True
400413004976 (197) transactions - April 2014 177.30 05/28/2014 101-42100-431990
177.30Check Total:
Vendor:2217 MLB NETWORK LLC AFFILIATE SALE Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: False
039249 MLB April 2014 288.40 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
288.40Check Total:
Vendor:1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: True
May 2014 Monthly appropriation 4,375.00 05/28/2014 101-45175-444310
4,375.00Check Total:
Vendor:1378 MONTICELLO TIRE AND AUTO SERVICE Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False
81930 #401 - (4) LT235/85R16 E Wrglr SR-A tire & valve stem (1/2) 305.10 05/28/2014 601-49440-422200
81930 #401 - (4) LT235/85R16 E Wrglr SR-A tire & valve stem (1/2) 305.10 05/28/2014 602-49490-422200
610.20Check Total:
Vendor:1379 MONTICELLO UMPIRES ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: True
2014-2 June 2014 Men's League - (60) Monday games; (32) Tuesday games 2,576.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
2,576.00Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 9
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:3726 MARTIN AND PEGGY MORAN Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 763-295-0403 48.87 05/28/2014 655-00000-115025
48.87Check Total:
Vendor:1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False
955721-00 (1) spring tine replacement set of 38 123.58 05/28/2014 101-45201-422100
123.58Check Total:
Vendor:3422 MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False
Voucher 11 12C003 - Voucher 11 - WWTF Sludge Dewatering Facility 1,910.90 05/28/2014 602-00000-165010
1,910.90Check Total:
Vendor:2072 NATIONAL TELCO TELEVISION CONSORTIUM Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: True
2244 NTTC - April 2014 27,640.08 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
27,640.08Check Total:
Vendor:1098 NATIONWIDE CLEC LLC Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: True
1128 April 2014 - (3.5) hr 637.00 05/28/2014 655-49870-431990
637.00Check Total:
Vendor:3138 NBC UNIVERSAL Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: True
761842 Bravo April 2014 302.82 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761844 Chiller April 2014 29.07 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761845 CLOO April 2014 29.07 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761846 CNBC April 2014 540.75 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761848 CNBC World April 2014 25.00 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761849 E! April 2014 292.01 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761851 Esquire April 2014 209.09 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761853 G4 April 2014 140.60 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761857 MSNBC April 2014 418.18 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761858 MUN2 April 2014 38.06 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761859 Olympics April 2014 129.78 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761860 Oxygen April 2014 277.59 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761862 PBS Kids Sprout April 2014 25.00 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761863 SYFY April 2014 349.69 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761864 Golf Channel April 2014 346.08 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761865 Telemundo April 2014 51.90 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761866 Universal HD April 2014 83.52 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
761868 USA Network April 2014 1,063.48 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 10
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
761869 NBC Sports Network April 2014 266.77 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
4,618.46Check Total:
Vendor:2082 NEUSTAR INC Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: True
Account: 19894 Invoice M-10711461 LNP charges 4/1-4/30/14 90.00 05/28/2014 655-49870-431990
Account: 20313 Invoice M-10711575 SOW charges 4/1-4/30/14 2.58 05/28/2014 655-49870-431990
Account: 20313 Invoice M-10711576 LNP charges 4/1-4/30/14 126.89 05/28/2014 655-49870-431990
219.47Check Total:
Vendor:1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: True
21287 Meetings - 4/1/14 Planning Comm; 4/28/14 CC meeting 300.00 05/28/2014 101-41910-431990
300.00Check Total:
Vendor:1405 OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: False
736431 (2) 12 pk megnets; (1) dz pens 35.32 05/28/2014 101-43110-420990
736431 (1) ctn 10-ream 34.79 05/28/2014 101-43110-420300
738028 (1) bx 19 hole binder cover clear 55.99 05/28/2014 101-43110-420990
738175 (1) pvc zip-around 3-ring 21.11 05/28/2014 101-43110-420990
147.21Check Total:
Vendor:3738 DANIEL D OLSEN Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False
Mon01 February 2014 1,865.00 05/28/2014 655-49870-430700
Mon01 March 2014 3,876.25 05/28/2014 655-49870-430700
Mon02 April 2014 5,640.00 05/28/2014 655-49870-430700
11,381.25Check Total:
Vendor:1417 OSC OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False
07777402 (1) CGA nipple 11.03 05/28/2014 101-43127-421520
11.03Check Total:
Vendor:1419 PAN O GOLD CO ST CLOUD Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: True
010004411906 re-sale 31.32 05/28/2014 226-45127-425410
31.32Check Total:
Vendor:1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: False
8447929 re sale 775.48 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
8447929 freight 10.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
8448289 re sale 151.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 11
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
8448289 freight 2.25 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
8448854 re sale 971.21 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
8448854 freighgt 15.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1,924.94Check Total:
Vendor:1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False
2599210 re sale 339.50 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
2599210 freight 4.17 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
2599211 re sale 409.60 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
2599211 re sale 2,121.70 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
2599211 freight 68.82 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
2601143 re sale 5,258.81 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
2601143 freight 59.78 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
2601144 freight 4.17 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
2601144 re sale 164.65 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
2602365 freight 65.33 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
2602365 re-sale 5,082.35 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
2602366 re sale 2,775.70 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
2602366 freight 59.08 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
2602896 re sale 2,170.77 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
2602896 freight 37.53 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
2602897 freight 25.02 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
2602897 re sale 890.90 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
2604769 re sale 261.30 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
2604769 freight 6.95 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
3526117 Ref inv# 2595567 -128.50 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
3526117 Ref inv# 2595567 -1.39 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
3526545 Ref inv# 2599211 -45.50 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
3526545 Ref inv# 2599211 -1.39 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
3526821 Ref inv# 2601143 -43.64 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
3526822 Ref inv# 2601144 -24.84 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
3526905 Ref inv# 2599211 -14.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
3526906 Ref inv# 2602366 -720.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
3526906 Ref inv# 2602366 -7.64 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
18,819.23Check Total:
Vendor:3721 MICHAEL REASONER Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False
5/13/14 Referee Men's Hockey - (2) games 5/7/14 70.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
5/8/14 Referee Men's Hockey - (2) games 5/4/14 70.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
140.00Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 12
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1455 RED'S MARATHON Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: False
4/30/14 38.00 05/28/2014 101-42200-421200
4/30/14 gas cans 18.92 05/28/2014 101-42200-421200
4/30/14 # 116 212.03 05/28/2014 101-43120-421200
4/30/14 (3) battery 375.00 05/28/2014 101-43120-422100
4/30/14 # 302 90.00 05/28/2014 601-49440-421200
4/30/14 # 105 232.18 05/28/2014 101-43120-421200
4/30/14 # 145 116.96 05/28/2014 101-43120-421200
4/30/14 # 103 135.20 05/28/2014 101-43120-421200
4/30/14 # 104 164.31 05/28/2014 101-43120-421200
4/30/14 Focus - Parts/Labor - oil change; front rotors & brakes 291.40 05/28/2014 217-41990-443990
1,674.00Check Total:
Vendor:2602 RFD TV Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False
2010-1242 RFD TV April 2014 27.19 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
27.19Check Total:
Vendor:1470 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: True
A23363 Electronic digital entry keypad - labor and parts 476.25 05/28/2014 101-42200-440100
A23431 Service/Labor-repair exit trim of back door by recruiter office 98.75 05/28/2014 226-45122-440100
575.00Check Total:
Vendor:1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: True
4/1-4/29/14 Mileage reimbrusement 4/1-4/29/14 201.60 05/28/2014 101-42700-433100
4/7-4/14/14 Reimb 4/11/14 Runnings - rake; pale; syringe lock disp; ect. 65.96 05/28/2014 101-42700-421990
4/7-4/14/14 Reimb 4/14/14 Animal Care Equipmt - disinfectant; leads 162.84 05/28/2014 101-42700-421990
4/7-4/14/14 Reimb 4/7/14 PetEdge -clipper blades; dryer; meds; ect. 367.03 05/28/2014 101-42700-421990
5/31/14 Contract 1,593.75 05/28/2014 101-42700-431200
2,391.18Check Total:
Vendor:3727 TED AND DENISE SCHNABEL Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 001-0592 5.18 05/28/2014 655-00000-115025
5.18Check Total:
Vendor:3735 LORI J SCHOENBORN Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False
5/14/14 SilverSneakers Classic 5/14/14 25.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430120
25.00Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 13
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False
W4364294 4/26/14 Cargill 179.56 05/28/2014 226-45122-431992
179.56Check Total:
Vendor:3675 GARY SETRUM Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False
5/13/14 Referee Men's Hockey - (2) games 5/11/14 70.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
5/8/14 Referee Men's Hockey - (2) games 5/4/14 70.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
140.00Check Total:
Vendor:3678 MORGAN SHEPHERD Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False
5/13/14 Referee Men's Hockey - (4) games 5/7/14 140.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
5/14/14 Referee Men's Hockey - (2) games 5/14/14 70.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
5/8/14 Referee Men's Hockey - (3) games 5/5/14 105.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
315.00Check Total:
Vendor:2301 SHOWTIME NETWORKS INC Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False
201404-40843608 Showtime April 2014 144.56 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
144.56Check Total:
Vendor:1487 CATHY SHUMAN Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: True
5/1/14 Mileage reimb - 5/1/14 Mple Lake C.H. Cable Comm mtg 14.67 05/28/2014 101-41310-433100
14.67Check Total:
Vendor:3728 STEVEN AND JENNIFER SMITH Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 001-0461 79.84 05/28/2014 655-00000-115025
79.84Check Total:
Vendor:3729 HUGO AND GAIL SONBUCHNER Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 001-0149 60.17 05/28/2014 655-00000-115025
60.17Check Total:
Vendor:3688 SOURCEONE SOLUTIONS LLC Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: True
4090 May billing - postage 546.62 05/28/2014 655-49870-431800
4090 May billing 2,000.24 05/28/2014 655-49870-431800
2,546.86Check Total:
Vendor:3309 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF MINNESOTA Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 14
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1159239 freight 11.25 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1159239 re sale 775.07 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
1159240 re sale 2,470.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
1159240 freight 33.75 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1161702 freight 25.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1161702 re sale 2,192.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
11671701 re sale 547.85 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
11671701 freight 6.25 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
6,061.17Check Total:
Vendor:1497 SPECTRUM SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: True
241443 (1) cs 2ply tissue; (2) cs 12/210ct kitchen towel 106.31 05/28/2014 101-42200-421990
106.31Check Total:
Vendor:2564 SPORTS PRO LLC Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: True
151 Labor - Fitness equipment repair 205.00 05/28/2014 226-45122-440800
151 Parts - Fitness equipment repair 636.76 05/28/2014 226-45122-440800
154 Labor - Fitness equipment repair 105.00 05/28/2014 226-45122-440800
154 Parts - Fitness equipment repair 123.86 05/28/2014 226-45122-440800
1,070.62Check Total:
Vendor:1710 ST CLOUD OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False
0138090-IN Service began 11/19/13 completed 1/7/14 - parts & labor 1,464.87 05/28/2014 101-43127-440100
0141362-IN Labor - 5/12/14 repair chain on opener 187.10 05/28/2014 655-49870-440100
1,651.97Check Total:
Vendor:2381 JIM AND ROBIN STEVENSON Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: True
FNM Refund 763-314-0604 27.40 05/28/2014 655-00000-115025
27.40Check Total:
Vendor:1506 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False
2208623 (1) cs toilet tissue; (1) cs 12/210 towel roll; ect. 128.10 05/28/2014 609-49754-421990
2208623 (1) cs 6/33.9 oz coffee 60.14 05/28/2014 609-49754-443990
188.24Check Total:
Vendor:1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: True
665-837-0005 Voice - nonpublished number charges 84.00 05/28/2014 655-49860-430910
665-838-0000 Voice - nonpublished number charges 262.00 05/28/2014 655-49860-430910
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 15
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
763-271-3230 100.86 05/28/2014 702-00000-432100
763-271-3257 90.37 05/28/2014 702-00000-432100
763-295-2005 17.95 05/28/2014 702-00000-432100
763-295-3714 329.86 05/28/2014 702-00000-432100
763-295-4054 46.83 05/28/2014 702-00000-432100
931.87Check Total:
Vendor:1521 CHARLENE THELEN Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: True
5/14-5/16/14 Water Works 5/14/14 & 5/16/14 50.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430120
5/5/14 (1) Water Works 5/5/14 25.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430120
75.00Check Total:
Vendor:1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: True
756191 re sale -72.12 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
821658 re sale 181.60 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
821659 re sale 64.50 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
821660 re sale 15,555.30 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
823213 re sale 52.25 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
823214 re sale 8,925.51 05/28/2014 609-49750-425200
24,707.04Check Total:
Vendor:1524 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: False
3001077146 5/1-7/31/14 710.70 05/28/2014 226-45122-431900
710.70Check Total:
Vendor:2165 TV GUIDE NETWORKS LLC TV GUIDE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: True
138145 TV Guide Network April 2014 444.14 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
444.14Check Total:
Vendor:2534 VAULTAS ALEXANDRIA LLC Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: True
1797 Data - June 2014 Gigabit Transport; Cross Connect; Rack Space 2,849.00 05/28/2014 655-49860-430930
2,849.00Check Total:
Vendor:1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV LLC VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATIONS INC Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: False
00036676 May 2014 68,300.00 05/28/2014 602-49480-430800
00036843 12C003 - Progress Inv #16 WWTP - Upgrades Ph 1 Design 151.31 05/28/2014 602-00000-165010
00037606 12C003 - Progress Inv #17 WWTP - Upgrades Ph 1 Design 300.00 05/28/2014 602-00000-165010
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 16
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
68,751.31Check Total:
Vendor:1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: True
1391068 re sale 439.20 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
1395411 re sale 75.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
514.20Check Total:
Vendor:1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: True
95669 freight 10.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
95669 wine 80.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
95669 re sale 381.25 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
98118 freight 10.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
98118 re sale 192.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
98118 re sale 250.50 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
923.75Check Total:
Vendor:3357 VUBIQUITY Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: True
Apr - 14 PPV and VOD April 2014 940.72 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
940.72Check Total:
Vendor:1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: False
4237 April 2014 water testing 285.00 05/28/2014 601-49440-422740
285.00Check Total:
Vendor:3683 BRADLEY WEBER Check Sequence: 103 ACH Enabled: True
5/8/14 Referee Men's Hockey - (2) games 5/4/14 70.00 05/28/2014 226-45127-430160
70.00Check Total:
Vendor:1564 BRIAN WELDON Check Sequence: 104 ACH Enabled: True
4/22/14 Mileage reimb - 4/22/14 Minnetonka pick up spin bikes 38.55 05/28/2014 226-45122-433100
4/9/14 Reimb 4/9/14 Home Depot purchase - (96) light bulbs-Seniorr Ctr 509.92 05/28/2014 101-45175-421990
548.47Check Total:
Vendor:1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC Check Sequence: 105 ACH Enabled: False
6584 Labor - Well #2 162.50 05/28/2014 601-49440-440440
6584 Parts - Well #2 - (3) 400AMP 250V time delay fuse 441.00 05/28/2014 601-49440-440440
6584 Parts - Well #1 - (3) 400AMP 250V time delay fuse 441.00 05/28/2014 601-49440-440440
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 17
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1,044.50Check Total:
Vendor:2651 WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 106 ACH Enabled: True
22913 MGFARM - Acquisition & Relocation Serv - Montgomery Frms-expense 7.39 05/28/2014 213-46522-431990
22913 MGFARM - Acquisition & Relocation Serv - Montgomery Frms-service 919.75 05/28/2014 213-46522-431990
927.14Check Total:
Vendor:2728 WINDSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS Check Sequence: 107 ACH Enabled: False
14129-74677 5/10-6/9/14 Usage charges - Intrastate 2.01 05/28/2014 655-49860-430910
2.01Check Total:
Vendor:1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 108 ACH Enabled: True
271923-00 active credit -6.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
360067 re sale 360.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
360067 freight 8.25 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
362.25Check Total:
Vendor:1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 109 ACH Enabled: False
502366 re sale 583.50 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
502366 freight 8.34 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
502888 re sale 337.91 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
502888 freight 5.56 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
935.31Check Total:
Vendor:1209 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE & SPIRITS Check Sequence: 110 ACH Enabled: False
1080162712 re-sale 5,460.45 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
1080162712 re-sale 974.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
1080162712 freight 77.42 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1080177098 re sale 798.50 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
1080177098 re sale 1,473.78 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
1080177098 freight 31.08 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1080180102 re sale 1,707.75 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
1080180102 re sale 3,474.26 05/28/2014 609-49750-425100
1080180102 FREIGHT 86.50 05/28/2014 609-49750-433300
1080180102 re sale 84.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425400
1080180103 re sale 56.00 05/28/2014 609-49750-425300
14,223.74Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 18
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:2219 WORLD FISHING NETWORK LTD Check Sequence: 111 ACH Enabled: True
547-1013 World Fishing April 2014 30.78 05/28/2014 655-49860-430920
30.78Check Total:
Vendor:1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 112 ACH Enabled: True
5/9/14 Fines and Fees April 2014 3,582.60 05/28/2014 101-00000-208020
3,582.60Check Total:
Vendor:1583 WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 113 ACH Enabled: True
10710177100 4/1-5/1/14 101.77 05/28/2014 602-49490-438100
10710177100 July 2014 service 19.95 05/28/2014 217-41990-431900
10710177100 July 2014 service 36.45 05/28/2014 101-45201-431900
10710177100 July 2014 service 27.95 05/28/2014 101-42200-431900
10710177100 July 2014 service 19.95 05/28/2014 601-49440-431900
10710177100 utx - July 2014 service 27.95 05/28/2014 226-45122-431900
10710177100 July 2014 service 32.95 05/28/2014 601-49440-431900
10710177100 July 2014 service 29.95 05/28/2014 601-49440-431900
10710177100 July 2014 service 19.95 05/28/2014 601-49440-431900
10710177100 utx - July 2014 service 27.95 05/28/2014 101-41940-431900
10710177100 July 2014 service 19.95 05/28/2014 101-45201-431900
10710177100 utx - June 2014 service 19.95 05/28/2014 609-49754-431900
10710177100 utx - June 2014 service 19.95 05/28/2014 226-45122-431900
10710177100 May 2014 service 58.91 05/28/2014 601-49440-431900
10710177100 June 2014 service 29.95 05/28/2014 601-49440-431900
10710177100 12C009 - Well #4 security install - labor & materials 434.95 05/28/2014 601-00000-165010
10710177100 1,314.32 05/28/2014 101-43160-438100
2,242.80Check Total:
Vendor:1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 114 ACH Enabled: True
025960002 ArcGIS Upgrade 3,724.50 05/28/2014 101-43111-430300
1010000197 General Ph 5 2014 (5th of 12) 7,500.00 05/28/2014 101-43111-430300
1010000197 General Ph 6 2014 ZSUNPD - Sunset Ponds sign review 69.00 05/28/2014 101-00000-220110
1010000197 General Ph 6 2014 TAC prep; meeting 514.50 05/28/2014 101-43111-430300
1010000197 General Ph 6 2014 - IRET 113.00 05/28/2014 101-00000-220110
101009087 State Aid Network Ph 8 226.00 05/28/2014 101-43111-430300
10102701156 Monticello Maps 124.50 05/28/2014 101-41910-430300
116061167 10C009 - Traffic Eng Services 3,115.50 05/28/2014 400-43300-459010
149447017 ZRCFOS - Second River Crossing Study 2,278.50 05/28/2014 101-43111-430300
149448029 ZRCFOS - Fallon Overpass 1,323.00 05/28/2014 101-43111-430300
149465018 12C003 - WWTP Sludge dewater Facility & Blower Ph 4 Const 1,276.75 05/28/2014 602-00000-165010
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 19
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
149470012 General WWTP 2,653.50 05/28/2014 602-49480-430300
14947209 Economic Development & Market Matching 4,000.00 05/28/2014 213-46301-430300
14947308 ZZPHOS - WWTF Facility Plan 944.00 05/28/2014 602-49480-430300
14947608 ZTOWER - Comm Tower - proj mgmt/coord 3,903.00 05/28/2014 101-41910-430300
14947708 ZZALDI - Aldi Plan Review 69.00 05/28/2014 101-00000-220110
14948003 10C009 - DSAH 75/TH25 Intersection Improvements0Ph 1 Feasibility 588.00 05/28/2014 400-43300-459010
14948102 Z12PMP - 2013 Pavement Mgmt Program 1,456.50 05/28/2014 101-43111-430300
14948303 ZBATCH - Shafer IUP 2,070.00 05/28/2014 101-00000-220110
14948502 ZZSRCS - Swan River School Expansion 69.00 05/28/2014 101-00000-220110
14948703 12C008 - Hillside Farms 3rd & 4th Public Impr 5,217.25 05/28/2014 400-43300-459010
14948802 Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment 3,921.84 05/28/2014 101-43111-430300
162751028 12C002 - 7th St (Elm to Minn) Ext 597.78 05/28/2014 101-43111-430300
162776014 2007-10C Fenning Ave Pathway - proj mgmt; design 979.00 05/28/2014 101-43111-430300
46,734.12Check Total:
Vendor:3730 WILLIAM AND RIKKI WYSOCKI Check Sequence: 115 ACH Enabled: False
FNM Refund 763-314-0919 24.23 05/28/2014 655-00000-115025
24.23Check Total:
Vendor:1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 116 ACH Enabled: False
5/12/14 utx - MGFARM 51-0517365-5 71.22 05/28/2014 213-46522-438100
5/5/14 51-6505906-1 1,162.27 05/28/2014 602-49490-438100
5/5/14 51-6505914-1 1,069.29 05/28/2014 101-43127-438100
5/5/14 51-6505915-2 907.91 05/28/2014 101-45201-438100
5/5/14 51-6505915-2 237.22 05/28/2014 601-49440-438100
5/5/14 utx - 51-6505915-2 41.72 05/28/2014 226-45203-438100
5/5/14 utx - 51-6505915-2 61.09 05/28/2014 101-45203-438100
5/8/14 51-7780310-4 49.31 05/28/2014 101-41940-438100
5/8/14 ZCULPS - 51-0623082-8 17.10 05/28/2014 213-46522-438100
5/8/14 51-6505907-2 66.77 05/28/2014 101-43140-438100
5/8/14 51-6505912-9 56.79 05/28/2014 101-42700-438100
5/8/14 51-6505913-0 423.44 05/28/2014 101-42200-438100
5/9/14 51-4271112-2 826.24 05/28/2014 101-45501-438100
5/9/14 51-6505909-4 141.82 05/28/2014 217-41990-438100
5/9/14 51-6505910-7 1,752.38 05/28/2014 609-49754-438100
5/9/14 51-6505911-8 1,702.19 05/28/2014 101-41940-438100
5/9/14 utx - 51-6505911-8 7,392.38 05/28/2014 226-45122-438100
5/9/14 51-6505911-8 437.70 05/28/2014 101-45175-438100
5/9/14 51-6505911-8 194.54 05/28/2014 101-42800-438100
5/9/14 51-0371645-4 17.10 05/28/2014 101-45201-438100
5/9/14 MGFARM - 51-0517384-8 11.51 05/28/2014 213-46522-438100
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 20
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
16,639.99Check Total:
Vendor:1907 XO COMMUNICATIONS LLC Check Sequence: 117 ACH Enabled: True
0267272014 Data - Internet access 5/1-5/31/14 5,004.87 05/28/2014 655-49860-430930
0267351734 Data - Internet access 5/1-5/31/14 2,275.48 05/28/2014 655-49860-430930
7,280.35Check Total:
Vendor:2076 ZAYO BANDWIDTH LLC Check Sequence: 118 ACH Enabled: True
003293 5/14 5/1-5/31/14 Private Line; Cost Recovery Surcharges 2,237.36 05/28/2014 655-49860-430910
2,237.36Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
425,524.74
118
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/21/2014 - 12:28 PM)Page 21
The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment.
Date 5/27/14 Approved by: _____________________________________
Mayor Clint Herbst
CityCouncilAgenda:5/27/2014
1
5B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments (TE)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCouncilisaskedtoratifythehiringanddeparturesofemployeesthathaveoccurred
recentlyinthedepartmentslisted.ItisrecommendedthattheCouncilofficiallyratifythe
hiring/departureofalllistedemployeesincludingpart-timeandseasonalworkers.
A1.BudgetImpact:(positionsaregenerallyincludedinbudget)
A2.StaffWorkLoadImpact:Ifnewpositions,theremaybesometraining
involved.Ifterminatedpositions,existingstaffwouldpickupthosehours,as
needed,untilreplaced.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoratifythehire/departuresoftheemployeesasidentifiedontheattached
list.
2.Motiontodenytherecommendedhiresanddepartures.
C.RECOMMENDATION:
BystatutetheCityCouncilhastheauthoritytoapproveallhires/departures.Citystaff
recommendsAlternative#1,fortheCounciltoapprovethehiresand/ordeparturesas
listed.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Listofnew/terminatedemployees
Name Title Department Hire Date Class
Jaymon DeMarais Seasonal Water/Sewer Worker Water Dept.5/9 Seasonal
Carolyn Granger DMV Manager DMV 5/19 FT
Hanna Kaufman Seasonal Parks Worker Parks 6/9 Seasonal
Name Reason Department Last Day Class
Tia Balsimo Voluntary MCC 3/1 PT
Cheryl Vergara Voluntary MCC 4/30 PT
Anna Eckman Voluntary DMV 5/14 FT
Scott Imdieke Voluntary Streets 5/19 Seasonal
Tamara Morrison Voluntary MCC 5/23 PT
NEW EMPLOYEES
TERMINATING EMPLOYEES
New Hire and Terms City Council 2014: 5/21/2014
CityCouncilAgenda:5/27/14
1
5C.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-053toacceptcontributionfrom
UptownEyecarefortheCommunityCenterFarmer’sMarket (KB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
UptownEyecareiscontributing$400asasponsoroftheFarmer’sMarkettogotothe
CommunityCenter.
TheCommunityCenterisalwayslookingtoprovideentertainmentfortheoutdoor
Farmer’sMarketheldonThursdaysintheLibraryParkingLot.Thisdonationfrom
UptownEyecarewillprovidetheabilitytohirelocaltalenttoentertainthemarketgoers.
Asrequiredbystatestatute,iftheCityacceptsthedonationoffunds,theCityCouncil
needstoadoptaresolutionspecifyingtheamountofthedonationanditsuse.
A1.BudgetImpact:Themoneywillbeusedtooffsetthecostofentertainmentfor
theFarmer’sMarket.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffaccountsforandreconcilesdonationscontributed
throughtheCity.Theyalsosearchforandreservetheentertainmentthatthe
sponsorshippaysfor.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovethecontributionandauthorizeuseoffundsasspecified.
2.Motiontonotapprovethecontributionandreturnthefundstothedonors.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommendationistoadopttheresolutionacceptingthecontributions.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Resolution#2014-053
Contributionform
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-053
RESOLUTIONAPPROVINGCONTRIBUTIONS
WHEREAS,theCityofMonticelloisgenerallyauthorizedtoaccept
contributionsofrealandpersonalpropertypursuanttoMinnesotaStatutesSections
465.03and465.04forthebenefitofitscitizensandisspecificallyauthorizedtomaintain
suchpropertyforthebenefitofitscitizensinaccordancewiththetermsprescribedbythe
donor.SaidgiftsmaybelimitedunderprovisionsofMNStatutesSection471.895.
WHEREAS,thefollowingpersonsandorentitieshaveofferedtocontribute
contributionsorgiftstotheCityaslisted:
DONOR/ENTITYDESCRIPTIONVALUE
UptownEyeCareCash$400
WHEREAS,allsaidcontributionsareintendedtoaidtheCityinestablishing
facilities,operationsorprogramswithinthecity’sjurisdictioneitheraloneorin
cooperationwithothers,asallowedbylaw;and
WHEREAS,theCityCouncilherebyfindsthatitisappropriatetoacceptthe
contributionsoffered.
NOWTHEREFOREBEITRESOLVED bytheCityCouncilofMonticelloas
follows:
1.ThecontributionsdescribedaboveareherebyacceptedbytheCityof
Monticello.
2.Thecontributionsdescribedabovewillbeusedasdesignatedbythe
donor.Thismayentailreimbursingorallocatingthemoneytoanother
entitythatwillutilizethefundsforthefollowingstatedpurpose:
DONOR/ENTITYRECIPIENTPURPOSE
UptownEyeCareCommunityCenterEntertainmentat
Farmer’sMarket
AdoptedbytheCityCouncilofMonticellothis27thdayofMay,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
______________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
CityCouncilAgenda:5/27/14
1
5D.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-054toacceptcontributionfromTDS
TelecomfortheCommunityCenter’sVisitwithSantaprogram (KB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TDSTelecomisdonating$400totheCommunityCenter’sVisitwithSantaeventheldin
December2014.
Oneofthemainattractions,asidefromSanta,isgettingapicturewithSantaasa
keepsake.ThedonationfromTDSTelecomwillbeusedtopayforthephotoandframe
oftheSantavisitors.
Asrequiredbystatestatute,iftheCityacceptsthedonationoffunds,theCityCouncil
needstoadoptaresolutionspecifyingtheamountofthedonationanditsuse.
A1.BudgetImpact:Themoneywillbeusedtooffsetthecostofthephotographer
andsuppliesatVisitwithSanta.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffaccountsforandreconcilesdonationscontributed
throughtheCity.TheSantaphotoisapartofalargereventputonbythe
CommunityCenter.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovethecontributionandauthorizeuseoffundsasspecified.
2.Motiontonotapprovethecontributionandreturnthefundstothedonors.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommendationistoadopttheresolutionacceptingthecontributions.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
Resolution#2014-054
Contributionform
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-054
RESOLUTIONAPPROVINGCONTRIBUTIONS
WHEREAS,theCityofMonticelloisgenerallyauthorizedtoaccept
contributionsofrealandpersonalpropertypursuanttoMinnesotaStatutesSections
465.03and465.04forthebenefitofitscitizensandisspecificallyauthorizedtomaintain
suchpropertyforthebenefitofitscitizensinaccordancewiththetermsprescribedbythe
donor.SaidgiftsmaybelimitedunderprovisionsofMNStatutesSection471.895.
WHEREAS,thefollowingpersonsandorentitieshaveofferedtocontribute
contributionsorgiftstotheCityaslisted:
DONOR/ENTITYDESCRIPTIONVALUE
TDSTelecomCash$400
WHEREAS,allsaidcontributionsareintendedtoaidtheCityinestablishing
facilities,operationsorprogramswithinthecity’sjurisdictioneitheraloneorin
cooperationwithothers,asallowedbylaw;and
WHEREAS,theCityCouncilherebyfindsthatitisappropriatetoacceptthe
contributionsoffered.
NOWTHEREFOREBEITRESOLVED bytheCityCouncilofMonticelloas
follows:
1.ThecontributionsdescribedaboveareherebyacceptedbytheCityof
Monticello.
2.Thecontributionsdescribedabovewillbeusedasdesignatedbythe
donor.Thismayentailreimbursingorallocatingthemoneytoanother
entitythatwillutilizethefundsforthefollowingstatedpurpose:
DONOR/ENTITYRECIPIENTPURPOSE
TDSTelecomCommunityCenterPhotosatVisitwithSanta
AdoptedbytheCityCouncilofMonticellothis27thdayofMay,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
______________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
1
5E.Considerationofrejectingallbidsforthepurchaseofanewfiretender (WO,SJ)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
OnApril14,2014,theCityCouncilauthorizedtheadvertisementofbidsforanewfire
tender.Sealedbidsforafiretenderwerereceivedupto10A.M.onThursday,May8th
andthebidopeningtookplaceimmediatelyafterward.Thebidresultswerepresentedto
CouncilattheMay12th councilmeeting.Thecounciltabledtheitemforfurther
investigationattherequestofthefinancedirectorandfirechief.
Twobidswerereceived.Onebidvariedsignificantlyfromspecificationsandwasabove
budgetat$335,000.Theotherbidwasnotsignedanddidnotmeettheminimum5%bid
bond.StaffisresearchingpurchasingthefiretenderthroughHGACBuy,whichhasa
cooperativepurchasingarrangementsimilartothestatecontracts.Earlyresearch
indicatesthecitycanpurchaseatenderatapproximately$15,000lessthanbudget
throughHGACBuy.Oddly,theHGACBuyvendor,CustomFire,withthetenderfor
whichwearecurrentlylooking,wastheonlyqualifyingbidder.CustomFirehassold
trucksto13MinnesotacitiesthroughHGACBuy.ThecitiesincludeSt.Michael,
Wayzata,Jordan,Eveleth,Virginia,andMontrose.
StaffwillpresentaproposalforpurchasingatenderatthefirstregularmeetinginJune.
A1.BudgetImpact:InitialpurchaseandannualGeneralFundleasepaymentsas
referencedabove.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Minimal-requiresstafftocompletepurchase
documents.
A3.LegalReview:Notapplicable.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoremovefromthetableandrejectallthebidsforthefiretender.
2.Motionofother.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
Citystaffrecommendsalternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
None
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
1
5F.Considerationofapprovingadditionalworkforaudit/conversionofFiberNet’s
SourceOnebillingsystem (BE)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilisaskedtogiveauthorizationtocompletethesuccessfulbillingconversion
witha$5,000expendituretocoverthecostofsoftwaremodifications.These
modificationsarenecessarytoassureaccuracyofbillingandincludethedesignofcertain
reportsnecessaryforregulatoryreportingandaccountingpurposes.Belowisasummary
ofthetasks.
SwitchAudit,makingsuretherightnumbersareonthecorrectaccountsandright
servicesareonthecorrectaccounts.($2500)
911,audit,setup,MSAGcleanup($750)
Onvoyprocesses-cleanupCARE,CallingNameandDA($250)
Directory-neededtohelpgetrightlistingsin($500)
CensusTractSetup-makesureaddressesandservicesarecorrectlyreported
($500)
A1.BudgetImpact:None,asthefixesareoffsetbybillingsystemcostsavings.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:FiberNetCSR’swillneedtoassistinsomeofthe
changeswithinSourceOneonceidentified.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoapproveseveralprogrammingupdatesfortheSourceOnebillingsystem
atacostnottoexceed$5,000.
2.MotiontodenyupdatestotheSourceOnebillingsystematthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffandtheFiberNetAdvisoryBoardrecommendAlternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
None
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
1
5G.ConsiderationofapprovingaLetterofAgreementbetweentheCityofMonticello
andNorthernStatesPowerCompany-Minnesotaforprovisionofemergency
services (RH)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
LettersofAgreement(LOA)areaFederalEmergencyManagementAgency(FEMA)
andNuclearRegulatoryCommission(NRC)requirementtohaveinplacebetweenall
nuclearfacilitiesandtheiroffsiteresponseorganizationsasidentifiedinthefederal
requirementofNUREG-0654,Rev1.Thesehavetobeupdatedonabiennialbasisto
accountforanynewrequirements.Thisyearthenewfederalrequirementistoalsolist
theHostileActionBased(HAB)responseintotheLOA.
FireChiefSteveJoergisawareofthisandunderstandstheexpectationsoftheagreement.
A1.BudgetImpact:Thetimespentonthisitemwillbereimbursedthroughthe
RadiologicalEmergencyProgram(REP)budget.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Minimal.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoapprovetheproposedLetterofAgreementbetweentheCityof
MonticelloandNorthernStatesPowerCompany-Minnesotafortheprovisionof
emergencyservicestotheMonticelloNuclearGeneratingPlant.
2.Motiontodenytheproposedagreementatthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
LetterofAgreementbetweentheCityofMonticelloandNorthernStatesPower
Company-Minnesota(proposed)
Page1of3
LETTEROFAGREEMENTBETWEENTHECITYOFMONTICELLO,MINNESOTA
ANDNORTHERNSTATESPOWERCOMPANY-MINNESOTAFORTHEPROVISION
OFEMERGENCYSERVICESTOTHEMONTICELLONUCLEARGENERATING
PLANT
PursuanttothetermsofthisLetterofAgreement(Agreement),theCityofMonticello,
Minnesota(City)andNorthernStatesPowerCompanyMinnesota(NSPM)(together,
Parties),agreetoprovideemergencyresponseservicestotheMonticelloNuclear
GeneratingPlant(MNGP)asfollows:
1.ThePartieswillrespondtoanincidentatMNGPconsistentwithrequirements
outlinedintheXcelEnergyOffsiteNuclearEmergencyPlan,DocumentNo.FP-
EP-PLAN-1,Rev.4(July26,2013)(OffsitePlan)andtheMNGPEmergency
Plan,Rev.41(MNGPPlan)(together,Plans)andanyrevisionstothePlans,
providedthatNSPMprovidesacopyoftherevisedPlantotheCityandFire
Departmentwithin30daysofthedateoftherevisedPlan.
2.EachPartyunderstandsitsresponsibilitiespursuanttothePlans.TheParties
havemutuallyadoptedandagreetousetheEmergencyActionLevelsas
specifiedintheMNGPPlan.
3.TheMinnesotaDepartmentofHomelandSecurityEmergencyManagement
(HSEM)isdraftingaMNGPRadiologicalEmergencyPreparednessHostile
ActionBasedEventsPlanSupplement.ThePartiesagreethattheywillrespond
toaHABeventconsistentwiththetermsofthedraftMNGPRadiological
EmergencyPreparednessHostileActionBasedEventsPlanSupplement
(“Supplement”)adoptedbytheHSEM.ThePartiesagreetoupdatethisLOAto
reflectagreementtoanychangestotheSupplement.
4.TheMonticelloFireDepartmentwillprovidefireandrescueservicetoMNGP.
TheFireDepartmentwillcoordinatewithotherlocalfiredepartmentstotheextent
necessaryandconsistentwiththePlans.IftheMonticelloFireDepartment
requiresassistancetorespondtoaneventatMNGP,includinganHABevent,the
FireDepartmentwillbesupplementedbyresourcesavailabletotheFire
DepartmentpursuanttotheNorthSuburbanMutualAidAgreementandthe
MinnesotaFireandRescueMutualAidPlan.ThePartieswillensurethatthe
agenciescalledupontoassistparticipateinthetraining,exercisesanddrills
requiredunderthePlansfortheseagencies.TheMonticelloFireDepartmentwill
betheleadfireagencyforallemergenciesintheCityofMonticello.ForaHostile
ActionBased(HAB)event,theMonticelloFireDepartmentwilldeploya
representativetotheIncidentCommandPostdependentupontype,location,and
scopeoftheincident,oncescenesafetyisestablished.
5.TheMNGPFireBrigadeLeaderwillworkwiththeMonticelloFireDepartment
Leadertoprovidelocalcoordinationoffirefightingandnon-firefightingactivities.
Non-firefightingtasksmayincludeactionssuchassprayingwatertocontain
radiologicalreleasesordirectingwatertoplantlocationsforrefilling/cooling
Page2of3
purposes.Inallcases,suchoperationsmaybeginonlywhentheradiological
andsecuritythreatsaremitigatedtoinsurethesafetyofbothplantpersonneland
firefighters.
6.TheMonticelloPublicWorksDepartment,incoordinationwiththeWrightCounty
SheriffandCountyEngineeringDepartment,willcontroltrafficoutofandinto
effectedareastotheextentfeasibleandconsistentwiththeMNGPPlan.
7.TheCityhasagreementsinplacetocalluponresourcesofotheragenciesto
assistintheresponsetoaHABevent.
8.TheMonticelloMayor,MembersoftheMonticelloCityCouncilortheMonticello
BuildingOfficial/NuclearEmergencyManagershallbetheonlyofficials
authorizedtoserveasPublicInformationOfficerfortheCityofMonticello.
9.NSPMwillrespondtoanemergencyatMNGPasoutlinedintheMNGPPlan.
NSPMwillsupportemergencyresponseservicesprovidedbytheCityanditsFire
Department,andallotherlawenforcementandemergencyservicesproviders,
includingprovidingtraining,exercisesanddrills.TheCityandFireDepartment
agreetoparticipateinthetraining,exercisesanddrills.
10.NSPMshallensurepromptaccesstotheMNGPinaccordancewithplant
procedures.
11.Withdrawal.ThisAgreementshallbecomeeffectiveonthedateofthelast
signaturebytheauthorizedrepresentativesoftheParties.TheAgreementmay
beamendedwithmutualconsentofallParties.Anypartymaywithdrawfromthe
Agreementbyprovidingonehundredtwentydays’writtennoticeofintentto
withdrawfromtheAgreementtoallotherparties.TheAgreementshallcontinue
infullforceandeffectforallotherPartiesthathavenotsubmittedanoticeof
intenttowithdrawfromtheAgreement.
Page3of3
FORCITYOFMONTICELLO,MINNESOTA
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministratorDate
CityofMonticello
ClintHerbst,MayorDate
CityofMonticello
SteveJoerg,FireChiefDate
CityofMonticello
RonHackenmuellerDate
BuildingOfficial/EmergencyManager
CityofMonticello
FORNORTHERNSTATESPOWERCOMPANY-MINNESOTA
KarenFiliDate
SiteVicePresident
MonticelloNuclearGeneratingPlant
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
1
5H.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-055acceptingbidsandawardinga
contractforthe2014SealcoatandFogSealProject (TM/SB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
Councilisrequestedtoconsideracceptingbidsandawardingacontractforthe2014
StreetBituminousSealcoatandFogSealingProject.The2014projecttotals
approximately82,429squareyardsorapproximately4.5milesofcitystreetsinthe
northwestareaofthecityasshownontheattachedmap.Theareastobesealcoated
havebeenpatchedandcracksealedbycityworkersinpreparationforthisproject.
In2013,theCouncilapprovedafogsealtestareaonMeadowOakAvenue.Theresults
ofthattestprovedtobeveryfavorable.Theindustryisleaningtowardthisapplicationas
ameanstoextendthelifeoftheroadwayforlowvolumeroadwaysatalowercost.Fog
sealingisanapplicationofasphaltemulsionsprayedontothepavementsurfacewithouta
cover.Theemulsionisdilutedtotheproperconsistencytoobtaincompletecoverageof
theroadway.Fogsealingperformsbetteronacoarseaggregatesurfacewhereasphalt
emulsionhasroomtobondbetweenaggregateparticles.Fogsealingisahighly
satisfactorycomplementtoanewchipsealsurfacetoaidchipretention;itcanalsoadd
uptotwotothreeyearsoflifetoachipseal.Theroadsurfaceheatsupeasierinthe
wintermonthswhichaidsinsnowremoval.Thefogsealalsoprovidesanaesthetically
pleasingblacksurfacethatgivestheappearanceofanewstreetoverlay.
Standardstodayinroadmaintenancearetosealcoatnewroadsfiveyearsaftertheyhave
beenconstructedandeverysevenyearsafterthat.Followingthisguide,thegoalweare
tryingtoachieveisforourresidentialstreetsurfacestolast40to45years.Wehavehad
severalconstructionprojectsonourroadwaysysteminpastyearsspendingmillionsof
dollars.Itisveryimportantthatwefollowuptheseprojectswithagoodmaintenance
programinwhichwetrytoadhereannuallywithrespecttotheinitialsubmittedbudgets.
BidswereopenedonMay19,2014,withtwobidoptions:oneforsealcoatingand
anotherbidoptionforsealcoatingandfogsealing.Atotaloffourbidswerereceived,
rangingfrom$103,860.54to$140,953.30.AlliedBlacktopCompanyofMapleGroveis
thelowestresponsiblebidder.Theirbidforthesealcoatonlywas$103,860.54.With
thechipsealandfogsealprojectcombined,theirbidwas$113,752.02.Acopyofthe
completebidtabulationsummaryisincludedassupportingdata.PublicWorkshasset
asideappropriatefundsinthe2014budgetforthisproject.Thelistofstreetstobechip
sealedandfogsealedareasfollows:
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
2
STREETNAME AREA STREETBY
WIDTH
STREET
SEG
LENGTH
TOTAL
SQYDS
WESTOFCHESTNUT –NORTHOFBROADWAY
CRAIGLANEWESTRIVERST–CULDESAC284402,060
HILLCRESTCIRWESTBROADWAY–CULDESAC281261,052
HILLCRESTRDWESTRIVERST–WESTRIVERST241,3093,491
HILLTOPDRWSTRIVERST–CULDESAC248752,368
KENNETHLNWESTRIVERST–CULDESAC304482,169
MATTHEWCIRWESTRIVERST–CULDESAC301051,188
OAKLNWILLOWST–DEADEND27286858
OAKVIEWCIRWESTBROADWAY-CULDESAC282891,544
RIVERSTWSANDYLN–OAKLN27234702
RIVERSTWWILLOWST–OTTERCREEKRD271,0153,045
RIVERSTWWESTRIVERST–RIVERSIDECIR28236734
RIVERSTWRIVERSIDECIR–KENNETHLN281,7745,519
RIVERSTWKENNETHLN–CRAIGLN283301,027
RIVERSTWCRAIGLN–MATTHEWCIR281,0103,142
RIVERSTWMATTHEWCIR–HILLCRESTRD28249775
RIVERSTWPRAIRIERDN–HILLRESTRD283401,058
RIVERSTWFRONTAGERD–HILLCRESTRD288052,504
RIVERSTWHILLCRESTRD–WESTBROADWAY282,0596,406
RIVERSTWCHESTNUTST–WILLOWST319463,258
RIVERSIDECIRWESTRIVERST–CULDESAC301141,238
SANDYLNOTTERCREEKRD–WILLOWST268872,562
SANDYLNWESTBROADWAY–OTTERCREEKRD271,0773,231
WILLOWSTWESTBROADWAY–WESTRIVERST274171,251
PARWESTDEVELOPMENT
JERRYLIEFERTDRWESTBROADWAY–KEVINLONGLEYDR346422,425
JERRYLIEFERTDRKEVINLONGLEYDR–KEVINLONGLEYDR341,2354,666
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
3
STREETNAME AREA STREETBY
WIDTH
STREET
SEG
LENGTH
TOTAL
SQYDS
KEVINLONGLEYDRJERRYLIEFERTDR–JERRYLIEFERTDR341,0003,778
KEVINLONGLEYDRJERRYLIERFERTDR–PRAIRIERD346322,388
PRAIRIEROAD&NICHOLASCIRCLE
PRAIRIERDWESTBROADWAY–KEVINLONGLEYDR293611,163
PRAIRIERDKEVINLONGLEYDR–MARVINELWOODRD293711,195
PRAIRIERDMARVINELWOODRD–MARVINELWOODRD294831,556
PRAIRIERDMARVINELWOODRD–HEDMANLN293771,215
PRAIRIERDHEDMANLN–NICHOLASCIR293261,050
PRAIRIERDNICHOLASCIR–CULDESAC303441,951
NICHOLASCIRPRAIRIERD–CULDESAC282331,563
PRAIRIERDNWESTBROADWAY–WESTRIVERST25119331
WESTRIVERSTREET(BROADWAYTOBALLFIELDPARKINGLOT)
RIVERSTWMARVINELWOODRD–END(GRAVELNEARFIELDS)341,1444,322
RIVERSTWMARVINELWOODRD–WESTBROADWAY(CR75)343261,232
PRAIRIEPINECOURT
PRAIRIEPINECTWESTBROADWAY–CULDESAC285172,412
TOTALSQUAREYARDS 82,429
AcompletesetofplansandspecificationsareonfileatCityHallandavailable
uponrequest.ThisprojectistobecompletedpercontractbyAugust22,2014.
A1.BudgetImpact:Inpreparationforthisproject,$160,000wasincludedinthe
2014StreetDepartmentBudgetforsealcoatingandfogsealing.Thelowbidfor
sealcoatingandfogsealingallofthestreetslistedaboveis$113,752.02.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Aprojectofthissizenormallytakestwodaysforthe
chipsealingandtwodaysforthefogsealing.WewillhaveaCityinspectoron
thejobsiteforthosedays.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
4
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2014-055acceptingbidsandawardingcontractto
AlliedBlacktopCompanyofMapleGrove,basedupontheirlowbidof
$113,752.02forthecombinedsealcoatingandfogsealingproject.
2.MotiontoadoptResolution#2014-055acceptingbidsandawardingcontractto
AlliedBlacktopCompanyofMapleGrove,basedupontheirlowbidof
$103,860.54forthesealcoatingprojectonly.
3.Motiontodenythebidsandnotawardthecontractfortheproject.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendstheCityCouncilapproveAlternative#1,acceptingbidsand
awardingthecontracttoAlliedBlacktopofMapleGroveintheamountof$113,752.02,
forthecombinedchipsealingandfogsealingproject..ThePublicWorksDepartment
andEngineeringDepartmentwillbeinspectingtheprojecttoseethatthecontractor
adherestotheplansandspecifications.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.Resolution#2014-055
B.2014SealcoatingProjectBidTabulation
C.2014SealcoatingProjectMap
D.ChipSealingandFogSealingInformation
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-055
ACCEPTINGBIDSANDAWARDINGCONTRACTFORTHE2014STREETSEALCOAT
ANDFOGSEALPROJECT
WHEREAS,theCityhassolicitedbidsforthe2014StreetSealcoatandFogSealProjectaccordingto
theplansandspecificationsprovidedtothepublic.Bidswerereceived,opened,andtabulated,and
werefoundtocomplywithsaidplansandspecifications:
BID BIDA BIDB-CHIPSEALANDFOGSEAL
SECU
RITY
CITY
STREETS
UNIT
PRICE
SQYD
CITY
STREETS
TOTALSUM
CHIP
SEAL
UNTIL
PRICE
SQYD
CHIPSEAL
TOTALSUM
FOG
SEAL
UNIT
PRICE
SQYD
FOGSEAL
TOTAL
SUM
TOTAL
FOGSEAL
&CHIP
SEALCONTRACTOR(X)
AlliedBlacktop
X10503-89thAveN $1.26 $103,860.54 $1.18 $97,266.22 $0.27 $16,485.80 $113,752.02
MapleGrove,MN
CaldwellAsphaltCo.
X24060-175thStNE $1.32 $108,806.28 $1.28 $105,509.12 $0.23 $18,958.67 $124,467.79
Hawick,MN
PearsonBrothers
X11079LamontAve
NE $1.36 $112,103.44 $1.27 $104,684.83 $0.36 $24,728.70 $129,413.53
Hanover,MN
AstechCorp
XP.O.Box1025 $1.47 $121,170.63 $1.43 $117,873.47 $0.28 $23,080.12 $140,953.59
St.Cloud,MN
WHEREAS,thebidsubmittedbyAlliedBlacktopCo.,ofMapleGrove,Minnesota,intheamountof
$113,752.02,forthecombinedtotalchipsealandfogsealforthe2014StreetBituminousSealcoatand
FogSealProject,inaccordancewiththeplansandspecifications,wasthelowestresponsiblebidand
shallbeherebyaccepted.
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1.Suchplansandspecifications,acopyofwhichisonfileintheofficeoftheCityClerk,arehereby
approved.
2.Bidssubmittedfortheprojectaccordingtotheplansandspecificationsareherebyaccepted.
3.TheCityAdministratorandMayorareherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoenterintoacontractwith
saidcompanyfortheconstructionofsaidimprovementsforandonbehalfoftheCityofMonticello.
4.ThePublicWorksDepartmentandEngineeringDepartmentshalldirectandinspecttheproject.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis27th dayofMay,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
_________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
BIDS RECEIVED: 4
BIDS OPENED: MONDAY, MAY 19 AT 2:00 P.M.
BID
SECURITY
CONTRACTOR (X)
1.Allied Blacktop
10503 - 89th Ave N $1.26 $103,860.54 $1.18 $97,266.22 $0.27 $16,485.80 $113,752.02
Maple Grove, MN 55369
2.Caldwell Asphalt Co.
24060 - 175th St NE $1.32 $108,806.28 $1.28 $105,509.12 $0.23 $18,958.67 $124,467.79
Hawick, MN 56273
3.Pearson Brothers
11079 Lamont Ave NE $1.36 $112,103.44 $1.27 $104,684.83 $0.36 $24,728.70 $129,413.53
Hanover, MN 55341
4.Astech Corp
P.O. Box 1025 $1.47 $121,170.63 $1.43 $117,873.47 $0.28 $23,080.12 $140,953.59
St. Cloud, MN 56302
BID B - CHIP SEAL AND FOG SEAL
BID TABULATION SUMMARY
2014 STREET BITUMINOUS SEALCOAT
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
CHIP SEAL
UNTIL PRICE
SQ YD
BID A
X
CITY STREETS
UNIT PRICE SQ
YD
CITY STREETS
TOTAL SUM
Tom Moores, Street Superintendent
_______________________________________________________________________________
CHIP SEAL
TOTAL SUM
FOG SEAL
UNIT PRICE
SQ YD
FOG SEAL
TOTAL SUM
TOTAL BID B
CHIP SEAL &
FOG SEAL
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the BIDs as received on May 19, 2014.
X
X
X
F:\TomMoores\CHIP SEAL PROJECTS\2014\QUOTE TAB - 2014 SEALCOATING PROJECT - 051914.xlsx: 5/21/2014 - PAGE 1 OF 1 -
CHIPSEAL
STOCKPILE
909GOLF
COURSERD
BROAD
W
AYE
5
CITYOFMONTICELLO
2014
SEALCOATINGPROJECT
DUMPSITE
CITYCOMPOST
FACILITY
RIVERSTW
PRAIRIEPINECT
RIVERSTW
RIVERSTW
RIVERSTW
PRAIRIERD
SANDYLN
SANDY LN
WILLOWST
RIVERSTW
OAKLN
RIVERSIDECR
HILLTOPDR
123
45
6
7
HILLCRESTRD
JERRYLIEFERTDR
KEVIN
LO
N
GLEY
DR
1—KENNETHLN
2—CRAIGLN
3–OAKVIEWCIR
4—MATTHEWCIR
5—FRONTAGERD
6—HILLCRESTCIR
7—NICHOLASCIR
Chip Sealing
Chip sealing is a type of preventative maintenance in which an asphalt emulsion and rock
chips are applied to the roadway to protect the roadway surface from environmental aging,
moisture damage, and oxidation. This places a protective coating over the pavement which
can slow the destructive effects of the environment.
The Minnesota Chip Seal Handbook identifies that the primary benefit to chip sealing an
asphalt pavement is to protect the pavement from the deteriorating effects of sun and
water. When an asphalt pavement is exposed to sun, wind, and water, the asphalt hardens
or oxidizes. This causes the pavement to become more brittle. As a result, the pavement
will crack because it is unable to bend and flex when exposed to traffic and temperature
changes. A chip seal combats this situation by providing a waterproof membrane which,
not only slows down the oxidation process, but also helps the pavement to shed water
preventing it from entering the base material.
A secondary benefit of chip sealing is an increase in the surface friction it provides. This is
accomplished by the additional texture the cover aggregate adds to the pavement. With
time, traffic begins to wear the fine material from an asphalt pavement surface. This
results in a condition referred to as raveling. When enough of the fine material is worn off
the pavement surface, traffic is driving mostly on the course aggregate. As these aggregate
particles begin to become smooth and polished, the roadway may become slippery, making
it difficult to stop quickly. A chip seal increases the pavement texture and increases the
surface friction properties.
Another benefit to chip sealing is that traffic can be on the road once the chips are placed
so there is no delay in waiting for a chemical break or a cure time. With a fog seal, traffic
cannot be placed on the road until the fog seal material has cured. Typically this cure time
can take 15 to 45 minutes depending on weather conditions; such as cloudiness, air
temperature, humidity, and wind conditions.
Chip sealing is typically completed after crack sealing. Typically a good chip seal placed
on a newer road can last eight to 14 years. This assumes the chip seal is protected during
placement to allow the proper time to cure. Other factors which affect a chip seals
performance include the type of binder that is used, the condition of the underlying road,
and external factors such as plow damage. It is the responsibility of the owner to insure
that these external factors do not contribute to premature failure of a chip seal.
Fog Sealing
Fog sealing is another type of preventative maintenance in which only the asphalt emulsion
is applied to the roadway to protect the roadway surface from environmental aging,
moisture damage, and oxidation. This preventative maintenance technique will not add
any strength to the pavement. Communities typically complete fog seals on cul-de-sacs
until recently. Some communities are evaluating completing fog seals on low- volume
roads or completing a test section.
The Minnesota Chip seal Handbook identifies several benefits resulting from a fog seal
application as follows:
The traveling public thinks it is driving on a new hot mix asphalt surface rather than a chip
seal.
1. The emulsion is diluted, which yields a very low viscosity that allows most, if not all,
of the additional asphalt binder to fill the chip voids increasing embedment by up to 15
percent, with no bleeding.
2. The fog seal re-seals any chips that may have partially broken loose during sweeping
operations.
3. Darkening the pavement surface with a light application of asphalt emulsion allows the
pavement surface temperature to rise. The subsequent softening of the binder allows
the chips to orient to their least dimension more quickly. This factor is very important
in Minnesota where late season chip seal projects are more susceptible to failure, due to
colder weather conditions.
4. Fog sealing can provide a designer with a chance to give the appearance of a re-
application of a chip seal application. If, after traffic has driven on the surface, it
appears that embedment is low, an engineer can add additional binder to the chip seal
by increasing the fog seal amount. In some cases, the amount of fog seal emulsion
applied increased to over 0.20 gallon per square yard.
5. When a fog seal is applied, a reduced amount of paint is necessary to make pavement
markings visible on the surface.
Fog sealing is typically completed after crack sealing and chip sealing. Typically a fog
seal will last three to five years. Fog sealing can also be used on top of a chip seal and can
act as a bond, both from the bottom up and the top down. It is important to note that while
the color of a fog seal may fade as early as a year after its application, a fog seal remains
effective for as many as two to four years. The industry is currently doing research on
developing new applications including faster curing times of fog seals.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
1
5I.Considerationofapprovinganinvestmentupto$2,500inanapplicationfor$10,000
inmatchingfundsforaBlandinInnovationGrant (BE)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilisaskedtoconsiderauthorizationtoinvest$2,500inanapplicationfor
$10,000inmatchingfundsviatheBlandingInnovationGrantprogram.Thefundswould
gotowardpreparationofastudyidentifyingmeasuresneededtoformallyestablishan
alliancechargedwithcoordinationoftelecommunicationrelatedresourcesamongits
memberswiththeintentofimprovingefficienciesandloweringcostof
telecommunicationservices.
Minnesota’smunicipalentitiesthatowncommunicationsnetworksofallsizeshave
similarissuestocontendwiththatincludemaximizingtheuseoftheirnetworks,
minimizingmiddlemilecosts,expandingtheeffectivenessfortheirpublic,facing
legislativethreatstotheirflexibilityandothers.Upuntilnow,therehasbeenno
concertedefforttohaveacollectiveapproachtoencourageandfacilitateeffectiveuseof
thesenetworksandadvocateagainstpotentialthreats.
Inordertocreatesuchanentityitisourintentiontocreateanonprofitassociationthat
willprovideanallianceneededbythisgroup,withaboardofdirectorsfrommember
communities,bylawstoguideactivitiesandaparttimeexecutivedirectortomanageday
todayoperations.Thisallianceofcities,countiesandregionalentitieswillhavethe
abilitytoforgenewpartnerships,assistmemberstofindnewparticipantstonegotiate
multi-providermiddlemileroutes,helpnegotiatefavorabletermsfromvendors,get
assistanceandtraininginregulatory,marketingandfinancialexpertiseandhaveaunited
voiceatthelegislature.
Inordertoacquirelegaladviceontheproperformationofthegroupandundertake
operationsfor2014,weareapplyingforagrantthatwillrequireamatchamount
providedbyinitialMunicipalBroadbandServiceOperators.
Wehavetalkedtosixotherpotentialparticipantsandtwowillmostlikelybecommitting
fundsforthisgrant($2,000each)priortotheapplicationdeadlinewhichisJune13th.
Thisrequestfor$2,500istheminimummatchforthis$10,000grant.Ifotherfundsare
committed,Monticellowillonlycontribute$2,000justliketheothermunicipaltelco
participants.BythetimethegrantisawardedinJulyIbelievewewillhavefivetosix
participantsintheMunicipalAllianceproject.Wewouldprefertohave$20,000between
participantfundingandthe$10,000grant.Thegrantislimitedto$10,000regardlessof
thetotalmatchingfundsraised.Thehigherthematchthebetterourchancesareof
receivingthisgrantaward.Wehopetohave$6,000committedatthetimeofthe
application.
A1.BudgetImpact:Upto$2,500ifthegrantisapproved.Longtermsavingswill
wellsurpassthisinvestment.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
2
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:GeneralManagerwillactasFiberNetrepresentative.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovematchingfundsnottoexceed$2,500foranapplicationfora
BlandinInnovationGrant.
2.MotiontodenymatchingfundsforBlandinGrant.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
MunicipalAllianceconcepthasbeendiscussedandwellreceivedbytheFiberNet
AdvisoryBoardandMarketMatching.TheBlandinFoundationislookingforinnovative
waystoreducecostsandfurtherdeploymentofbroadbandservices.Staffbelievesthat
theproposedapplicationformatchingfundsfitsgrantcriteriaquitewell.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
DougDawson’sopinionoftheMunicipalAllianceconcepttooneofhisclientcities.
“BrianEstrem,thenewGMatMonticelloisapplyingforagranttodoafeasibilitystudy
toestablishanorganizationthatwouldjointogethermunicipalandotherfibernetworks
intheregiontocreateoperationalefficiencies.Iamveryfamiliarwiththismodeland
havehelpedtocreatethesekindofgroupsforthesmalltelcos.Thegroupwoulddo
thingslikebuyInternetaccessasagrouptogetcheaperprices.
YououghttogiveBrianacall.Ihavecopiedhimonthisemail.Atthispointyourcityis
noteveninthebusinessandyoustillhaveawaystogotomakethatdecision,butIthink
Brianmightbenefitfromaletterofsupportsayingthatthissoundslikeagoodideaand
issomethingyourgroupwouldconsidershouldyoumoveforwardintothefiberbusiness.
Icantellyouthateveryoneofthesegroupssavesmoneyforitsmembers,soit’s
basicallyano-brainertojoinintheseeffortsoncetheyareestablished.It’salways
bettertodocertainthingsasagroup.”
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
1
7A.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-057approvingtheconditionalusepermit
forcross-access,preliminaryandfinalPlat,anddevelopmentcontract,andapproving
theDundasRoadeasementagreementandencroachmentagreementfortheCedar
StreetAddition (Goodwill),acommercialsubdivisioninaB-3(HighwayBusiness)and
B-4(RegionalBusiness)District.Applicant:Oppidan (NAC)
A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND:
Property:Legal:PID155500142400
Address:Unassigned
PlanningCaseNumber:2014-017
Request(s):PreliminaryandFinalPlatApproval
ConditionalUsePermitforCrossAccess
DeadlineforDecision:June6th,2014–ConditionalUsePermit
August5th,2014–PreliminaryPlatandFinalPlat
LandUseDesignation:PlacestoShop
ZoningDesignation:DevelopmentsiteiszonedB-3,HighwayBusiness
District
Thepurposeofthe“B-3”(HighwayBusiness)Districtisto
provideforlimitedcommercialandserviceactivitiesand
provideforandlimittheestablishmentofmotorvehicle
orientedordependentcommercialandserviceactivities.
Overlays/Environmental
RegulationsApplicable:None
CurrentSiteUse:Vacant/undeveloped
SurroundingLandUses:
North:Vacant/undevelopedcommercialland
East:Vacant/undevelopedcommercialland
South:Commercial/retail
West:Highway25;Commercial/retailwestofHwy25
ProjectDescription:OppidanInc.hassubmittedplanstocreatea2.64acrelotto
provideforconstructionofa17,636squarefootretail
facilitywithadrive-throughdrop-off/donationcentertobe
leasedtoGoodwillEasterSealsofMinnesota.Theparcel
willlietothewestofCedarStreet,withtheremaining
portionofthepropertytobeplattedasanoutlotfor
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
2
developmentatsomefutureundetermineddate.Twocurb
cutaccessdrivesareproposedonCedarStreettofacilitate
vehicularcirculationthroughthesiteanddrop-offarea.
Theaccessdriveatthenorthernendoftheparcelis
anticipatedtobesharedwithfuturecommercial
developmentontheadjoiningparceltothenorth.
ANALYSIS
Concurrentwiththepreliminaryandfinalplatandconditionalusepermitreview,staff
havecompletedasiteplanreviewforthisapplicationandcommentsrelatedtothat
reviewareincorporatedinboththeplatandCUPreview.
PreliminaryandFinalPlat.
Lots.Thepreliminaryplatinvolvesthecombinationoftworemnantparcelswithan
existing38.11acreparcelandsubsequentsubdivisiontocreateone2.64acreparcelfor
thepurposesofdevelopmentofaGoodwillretailfacilitywiththeremainder(35.64acres)
plattedasanoutlot.
PID1555001423020.05Acres
PID1555001423140.33Acres
PID15550014240038.11Acres
ThereisnominimumlotareaforparcelsintheB-3HighwayBusinessDistrict.The
proposedlotexceedsthe100footminimumlotwidthstandard(TitleXI,Chapter5,Sec.
11-5-2).
ItshouldbenotedthatportionsoftheremainingoutlotarecurrentlyzonedbothB-3and
B-4,howevernodevelopmentisplannedforthoseareasatthistime.
Zoning.ThemajorityofthesiteiszonedB-3,HighwayBusinessDistrictexceptforan
approximately15acreareasouthofDundasRoadandwestofEdmonsonAvenueNE.
Underlyingzoningwillremain;norequestsforrezoninghavebeensubmitted.Thearea
wherethe2.64acrelotisbeingsubdividedfortheGoodwillretailfacilityiszonedB-3
HighwayBusinessDistrictandCommercialRetailisapermitteduse.
Streets.CedarStreetcurrentlyrunsalonganeasementthroughthe38.11acreparcel.
ThecityisrequestingthattheapplicantplatthefullCedarStreetright-of-wayforfinal
platapproval(TitleXI,Chapter5,Sec.11-5-3).DundasRoadwillbeprovidedasan
easementthroughOutlotA.Right-of-waydedicationwillberequiredforDundasRoad
andEdmonsonAvenueNEwhenOutlotAisdeveloped.
Easements.Thepreliminaryplatshowsanexistingdrainageandutilityeasementonthe
southandsouthwestportionsoftheproperty.Anexisting150footwideoverhead
electricalutilityeasementalsocrossesthenorthernthirdoftheparcel.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
3
Thepreliminaryplatandfinalplatsshowdrainageandutilityeasementsaroundtheentire
perimeteroftheLot1,Block1developmentparcel.Theplanshavebeenrevisedtoshow
therequired6and12footwidedrainageandutilityeasementsalongplatperimeter.
Thesiteplanindicatesdrivewayareasencroachingondrainageandutilityeasements
alongthewestandsouthboundaries;anencroachmentagreementwiththecitywillbe
needed.
ErosionControlandDrainage.Theapplicanthassubmittedsitegrading,erosion
control,andstormwaterdrainageplans.Saidplansaresubjecttoreviewandapprovalby
thecityengineer.
Utilities.Theapplicanthassubmittedsiteutilityplans.Saidplansaresubjecttoreview
andapprovalbythecityengineer.
AdditionalSiteDevelopmentFeatures.Submittedlandscaping,lighting,andbuilding
plansgenerallymeettheperformancestandardsasoutlinedinthezoningordinance
subjecttocommentsandconditionsnotedbelow.
ThetenantwillberequiredtoobtainasignpermitforsitesignageperTitleX,Chapter4,
Section4-5.Sitesignagemustincludedirectionalsignsforthedrop-offfacility.The
applicantsareproposingwallsignageonlyforthefacility,withtheexceptionthatsome
directionalsignagewillprovidetrafficcontrolontheproperty,inaccordancewithsign
ordinancerequirements.
ParkDedication.Noparkdedicationisrequiredfromcommercialproperty.
AdditionalReview.Thepreliminaryandfinalplatsaresubjecttoreviewandcomment
bytheMinnesotaDepartmentofTransportationduetoHighway25adjacencyand
WrightCountyinitsplatandrecordingrole.
ConditionalUsePermit.
Theapplicantisseekingapprovalofaconditionalusepermittoallowforfuturecross
accessbetweenthesiteandtheparceltothenorth.Permittingcrossaccessbetweenthe
propertieswillreducethenumberofcurbcutsonthewestsideofCedarStreetand
enhancesafetyandtrafficcirculationinthearea.
ConditionalUsePermitEvaluationCriteria.
Approvalofaconditionalusepermitapplicationrequiresthatthecityfindthatconditions
canbeestablishedtoensurethatallofthefollowingcriteriawillalwaysbemet(Section
2.4(D)(4)(a)):
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
4
(i)Theconditionalusewillnotsubstantiallydiminishorimpairpropertyvalueswithin
theimmediatevicinityofthesubjectproperty;
Comment:Theproposedcrossaccesswillprovideenhancedsitecirculationandreduce
thenumberofcurbcutsalongthewestsideofCedarStreet,improvingsafetyalongthis
commercialarterial.Thisconditionismet.
(ii)Theconditionalusewillnotbedetrimentaltothehealth,safety,morals,orwelfareof
personsresidingorworkingneartheuse;
Comment:Theproposeduseisconsistentwithothercrossaccessarrangementsinthe
adjacentcommercialareasandisnotanticipatedtohaveadetrimentalaffectonpersons
inthesurroundingarea.Thisconditionismet.
(iii)Theconditionalusewillnotimpedethenormalandorderlydevelopmentof
surroundingpropertyforpermittedusespredominantinthearea;
Comment:Theproposedcrossaccesswillrequireasharedaccessandmaintenance
agreementbetweenpropertyowners.Theinstallationoftheaccessdrivepriortothe
developmentoftheparceltothenorthmayfacilitatefuturedevelopmentofthatparcel.
Inthealternative,theapplicantsmayprovideforanacceptableagreementthatdefers
accessconstructionuntiltheparceltothenorthisdeveloped.Accessdrivesontheeast
sideofCedarStreetaretypicallyrequiredtobealignedwiththeproposedaccessdrives
onthewestsideofCedarStreet.Asidewalkconnectiontothenorthmustbeinstalled
betweenthenortheastdriveaccessandnorthpropertylineinanticipationofafuture
connectionwhentheadjoiningparcelisdeveloped.
Thisconditionismet.
(iv)Theconditionalusewillnotposeanundueburdenonpublicutilitiesorroads,and
adequatesanitaryfacilitiesareprovided;
Comment:ThecrossaccesswillreducethenumberofcurbcutsalongCedarStreet
enhancingvehicularcirculationandsafety.Boththeparcelinquestionandtheparcelto
thenortharecurrentlyservedbywater,stormsewerandsanitaryserviceswithsufficient
capacityinanticipationofcommercialdevelopment.Utilityplansaresubjecttoreview
andapprovalbythecityengineer.Thisconditionismet.
(v)Theconditionalusecanprovideadequateparkingandloadingspaces,andallstorage
onthesitecanbedoneinconformancewithCitycoderequirements;
Comment:Theparcelinquestionprovidessufficientparkingandloadingpercitycode
requirements.Futuredevelopmentoftheparceltothenorthservedbythecrossaccess
willbesubjecttoperformancestandardsrelatedtoparking,loading,andstorage.
SiteParkingRequirements:
Use:Ratio:SquareFeet:
Retail1:20017,636sf
Totalrequired:89spaces
Totalprovided:90spaces
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
5
Thesiteprovidesparkinginexcessofordinancerequirements.Thesitehascompliant
off-streetloadingfacilitiesandallstoragewillbeprovidedwithintheretailbuilding.A
connectiontothetrailalongHighway25mustbeprovidedforbicycleandpedestrian
accesstothesitefromthewest.Thisconditionismet.
(vi)Theconditionalusewillnotresultinanynuisanceincludingbutnotlimitedtoodor,
noise,orsightpollution;
Comment:Theproposeduseisnotanticipatedtogenerateanynuisance.Thedrop-off
structureisscreenedtoreducevisualimpacts;additionalscreeningoftheloadingarea
inthesoutheastcornerofthepropertywillberequired.Theareadesignatedas“snow
storage”mustbeutilizedtoincorporateadditionaltreeandshrubplantingsforamore
robustlandscapebuffer.
Sitelightingexceedsordinancestandardsintwomeasurementsatthesoutheastentrance
tothesite.Photometricreadingsslightlyexceed1.0footcandlesinacoupleoflocations
alongthesouthandeastpropertylines.Itistheopinionofstaffthatthisconditionis
acceptablegiventheminordegreeofdiscrepancyandthelocationatthedriveentrance
andalongsidewalkswhereadditionalvisibilityispreferred.Thisconditionismet.
(vii)Theconditionalusewillnotunnecessarilyimpactnaturalfeaturessuchas
woodlands,wetlands,andshorelines;andallerosionwillbeproperlycontrolled;
Comment:Theproposedusewillnotimpactanynaturalfeatures;thereareno
significantexistingnaturalfeaturesonthesite.Submittederosioncontrolandsite
landscapeplansshowrequiredcontrolstoreduceerosionduringandafterconstruction.
Thisconditionismet.
(viii)Theconditionalusewilladheretoanyapplicableadditionalcriteriaoutlinedin
Chapter5fortheproposeduse.
Comment:TheproposedretaildevelopmentisapermitteduseintheB-3Highway
BusinessDistrict;noadditionalcriteriaapply.Thisconditionismet.
AdditionalCrossAccessConditions.
Chapter4,Section4.8,SubsectionG.(2)(iv.)providesforcrossaccess/parkingbetween
adjoiningbusinesspropertiessubjecttothefollowingconditions:
1.TherequiredislandandlandscapingrequirementsinSection4.1aremet.
Comment:SubmittedlandscapeplansmeettherequirementsofSection4.1;all
landscapedareasmustbeirrigated.Theapplicantmustobtainapprovalfromthe
easementholderforalltreesandshrubsplantedwithindrainageandutilityeasements.
Thisconditionismet.
2.Thevehicularuseareameetstherequiredsetbackattheperimeteroftheparcelsin
question.
Comment:Theparkingandvehicularcirculationareasmeettherequiredsetbackonthe
parcelproposedfordevelopment.Itisrecommendedthattheeasterlydriveaislealong
CedarStreetberealignedtorunparallelwiththestreet.Ifafewparkingstallsarelost
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
6
tothisre-design,theapplicantmayidentify“proofofparking”locationstomitigateany
loss.Vehicularuseareasonthenorthernparcelmustmeetsetbackrequirementsatsuch
timedevelopmentisproposed.Thisconditionismet.
3.Thecurbcutaccesslocationstotheparkinglot(s)areapprovedbytheCity.
Comment:Thecurbcutaccesstotheparcelinquestionissubjecttocommentand
approvalbythecityengineer;ifrealignmentofdriveaislesorcurbcutaccesslocations
resultintheeliminationofparking,thecitymayacceptsuchchangesifaproof-of-
parkingareaisdesignatedonthesite.
Theapplicantmustagreetopermitcurbcutaccessfromtheproposedparkinglottothe
parceltothenorthatsuchtimeasthenorthernparcelisdeveloped.Futureparkinglot
accessandcirculationbetweentheparcelinquestionandthenorthernparcelshallbe
subjecttoreviewandapprovalbythecityengineer.Thisconditionismet.
4.Asharedparking/accessandmaintenanceagreementisprovidedbytheparking
ownersandrecordedagainstallsubjectproperties.
Comment:Saidparking/accessandmaintenanceagreementshallbeprovidedbythe
adjoiningpropertyownersatsuchtimeasthenorthernparcelisdeveloped.This
conditionismet.
DevelopmentContract,EasementAgreementandEncroachmentAgreement
StaffandtheCityAttorneyrecommendapprovalofthedevelopmentcontract,easement
agreementandencroachmentagreement.
Thedevelopmentcontractincludescustomarylanguagefordevelopmentprojects,aswell
aslanguagespecifictothisdevelopmentrelatingtotheconditionsofCUPapproval,the
requiredtrunkareacharges,aswellasreferencetothepaymentofdeferredspecial
assessments.Theagreementalsoincludesprovisionsforrequiredlettersofcreditforsite
andpublicimprovementsandawarrantyrequirementforthesidewalkpublic
improvement.ThecontractalsoincludesaFeeOwnerConsenttothedevelopment
contract.
Theencroachmentagreementisfortheapplicant’sproposeddriveaisleatthesouthern
portionofLot1,Block1andincludestheCity’scustomarylanguageforprotectionofthe
City’sinterestsasrelatedtotheeasementarea.
Theeasementagreementprovidesthenecessary80’easementforDundasRoadasthe
ALTA/preliminaryplat.Asnotedearlierinthereport,atthetimeofdevelopmentofthe
outlot,plattingofassociatedrightsofway,includingDundasRoad,willberequired.
PlanningCommissionActionandRecommendation
ThePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingatitsregularmeetingonMay6,2014on
boththePreliminaryPlatandConditionalUsePermit.Theapplicantsstatedatthe
hearingthattheyhadreviewedandagreedwitheachoftheproposedconditionsin
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
7
ExhibitZofthestaffreport.Therewerenomembersofthepublicspeakingatthe
hearing.ThePlanningCommissionunanimouslypassedaresolutionrecommending
approvalofboththePlatandtheConditionalUsePermitwiththeconditionsproposedby
staff.
SincethetimeofthePlanningCommissionaction,theapplicanthassubmittedupdated
plansaddressingmanyoftheconditionsintheoriginalExhibitZ.Thosechangesinclude
thefollowing(usingtheitemsasdesignatedintheoriginalExhibit):
PlatConditions
1.Thefinalplatmustshowrequireddrainageandutilityeasementsaroundthe
perimeteroftheparcelandsucheasementsshallbededicatedtothecity.This
itemhasbeenupdatedwiththerevisedplans.
2.Thefinalplatshallincludetheplattingofthefullright-of-wayforCedarStreet.
Thisitemhasbeenupdatedwiththerevisedplans.
3.ThefinalplatshallincludeaneasementthroughOutlotAforDundasRoad.
Aseparateeasementagreementhasbeendraftedforsignature.
4.Theproposedutility,grading,drainage,anderosioncontrolplansaresubjectto
reviewandcommentbytheCityEngineer.Theapplicantshallcomplywithall
recommendationsoftheCityEngineerasprovidedinthecommentletterdated
May1st,2014.Stillapplicable.
5.Theapplicantshallexecuteadevelopmentagreementcoveringthetermsofthe
City’sPlatandCUPapproval.Adevelopmentagreementhasbeenpreparedand
reviewedbyallparties.TheagreementincludedforCouncil’sreviewand
approvalisreflectiveandinclusiveofcommentsbytheapplicant,seller,staff
andCityattorney.
ConditionalUsePermitConditions
1.Developershallenterintoasharedaccessandmaintenanceagreementwiththe
adjoiningpropertyownertothenorthtoberecordedagainstbothparcelsifatsuch
timetheparceltothenorthisdevelopedandrequirestwoaccesspointsfromCedar
Street,unlessalternativeaccessplansareotherwiseapprovedbytheCity.Still
applicable.
2.Asidewalkconnectionmustbeinstalledbetweenthenortheastdriveaccessand
northpropertyline.Thisconnectionisshownontheupdatedsiteplans.
3.Atrailconnectionmustbeprovidedfromtheparkinglottothetrailalong
Highway25.Thisconnectionisshownontheupdatedsiteplans.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
8
4.Additionallandscapingmustbeprovidedatthesoutheastcornerofthepropertyto
ensuresufficientscreeningoftheloadingarea.Stillapplicable.
5.Alllandscapedareasmustbeirrigated.Planshavebeenprovidedshowing
irrigation.
6.Theapplicantmustobtainapprovalfromeasementholdersforallproposedtree
andshrubplantingsineasementareas.Stillapplicable.
7.Thenortheastdrivewaymustberealignedperengineer’srequirements;ifparking
spacesareremovedasaresult,aproofofparkingareashouldbedesignatedonthe
site.Updatedplansshowtheparkinganddriveaislesrealignedasnoted.
8.Encroachmentagreementsmustbefiledwiththecityforallareaswheredrive
aislesencroachondrainageandutilityeasements.
Aseparateencroachmentagreementhasbeendraftedforsignature.
9.Futurecurbcutaccesslocationsbetweentheparcelinquestionandtheadjoining
propertytothenorthshallbesubjecttoreviewandapprovalbythecity.The
developmentagreementincludedforapprovalforthedevelopmentincludesa
slightlymodifiedcondition.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
ThePlanningCommissionunanimouslyrecommendsAlternative1below.
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2014-057approvingtheconditionalusepermitfor
cross-access,preliminaryandfinalPlat,anddevelopmentcontract;andapprovingthe
DundasRoadeasementagreementandencroachmentagreementfortheCedarStreet
Addition,acommercialsubdivisioninaB-3(HighwayBusiness)andB-4(Regional
Business)District,basedonfindingsinsaidresolution.
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution2014-057andtodenytheDundasRoad
easementagreementandencroachmentagreementfortheCedarStreetRetail
Addition,basedonfindingstobemadebytheCityCouncil.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsAlternative#1forapprovalofthepreliminaryandfinalplat,the
correspondingdevelopmentagreement,encroachmentagreementandDundasRoad
easementagreement,aswellastheconditionalusepermitforcrossaccessbetweenthe
subjectpropertyandtheadjoiningparceltothenorth.Thisrecommendationisbasedon
therecommendationandfindingsofthePlanningCommission,andisconditionedonthe
requirementsofExhibitZ.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
9
D.SUPPORTINGDATA
ExhibitZ-ConditionsofApproval
A.Resolution#2014-057
B.PlanningCommissionResolution2014-048
C.ApplicantNarrative
D.SiteDevelopmentPlans,including:
a.TitlePage
b.ExistingConditions
c.SitePlan
d.GradingPlan
e.ErosionControlPlan
f.UtilityPlan
g.LightingPlanandDetail
h.LandscapingPlanandDetail
i.IrrigationPlan
j.TruckTurnPlan
k.FloorPlan
l.Elevations
m.ColoredElevationPerspective
n.ColoredElevations
E.PreliminaryPlat
F.FinalPlat
G.Engineer’sCommentLetter,dated05/01/14
H.Applicant’sEngineerResponseLetter
I.DevelopmentContract
J.DundasRoadEasementAgreement
K.EncroachmentAgreement
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
10
EXHIBITZ
ConditionsforApproval-CedarStreetAddition
ConditionalUsePermitforCrossParking/Access&PreliminaryandFinalPlat
1.Thefinalplatmustshowrequireddrainageandutilityeasementsaroundtheperimeterof
theparcelandsucheasementsshallbededicatedtothecity.
2.Thefinalplatshallincludetheplattingofthefullright-of-wayforCedarStreet.
3.ThefinalplatshallincludeaneasementthroughOutlotAforDundasRoad.
4.Theproposedutility,grading,drainage,anderosioncontrolplansaresubjecttoreview
andcommentbytheCityEngineer.Theapplicantshallcomplywithall
recommendationsoftheCityEngineerasprovidedinthecommentletterdatedMay1st,
2014.
5.TheapplicantshallexecuteadevelopmentagreementcoveringthetermsoftheCity’s
PlatandCUPapproval.
6.Asidewalkconnectionmustbeinstalledbetweenthenortheastdriveaccessandnorth
propertyline.
7.AtrailconnectionmustbeprovidedfromtheparkinglottothetrailalongTH25.
8.Additionallandscapingmustbeprovidedatthesoutheastcornerofthepropertytoensure
sufficientscreeningoftheloadingarea.
9.Alllandscapedareasmustbeirrigated.
10.Theapplicantmustobtainapprovalfromeasementholdersforallproposedtreeand
shrubplantingsineasementareas.
11.Thenortheastdrivewaymustberealignedperengineer’srequirements;ifparkingspaces
areremovedasaresult,aproofofparkingareashouldbedesignatedonthesite.
12.Encroachmentagreementsmustbefiledwiththecityforallareaswheredriveaisles
encroachondrainageandutilityeasements.
13.Futurecurbcutaccesslocationsbetweentheparcelinquestionandtheadjoining
propertytothenorthshallbesubjecttoreviewandapprovalbythecity.
14.Developershallenterintoasharedaccessandmaintenanceagreementwiththeadjoining
propertyownertothenorthtoberecordedagainstbothparcelsifatsuchtimetheparcel
tothenorthisdevelopedandrequirestwoaccesspointsfromCedarStreet,unless
alternativeaccessplansareotherwiseapprovedbytheCity.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-057
APPROVINGAPRELIMINARYANDFINALPLATANDDEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENTFORCEDARSTREETADDITION,ACOMMERCIAL
SUBDIVISIONINAB-3(HIGHWAYBUSINESS)ANDB-4(REGIONALBUSINESS)
DISTRICTANDAPPROVINGACONDITIONALUSEPERMITFORCROSS
ACCESSBETWEENTWOADJOININGBUSINESSPARCELSINAB-3HIGHWAY
BUSINESSDISTRICT
WHEREAS,OppidanInc.,onbehalfofGoodwillEasterSealsofMinnesota,hassubmitted
anapplicationforpreliminaryandfinalplatapprovalandaconditionalusepermitforcross
access/parkingbetweenadjoiningbusinessproperties;and
WHEREAS,thepreliminaryandfinalplatwillmeetdesignstandardsandotherprovisions
outlinedinTitleXI,theMonticelloSubdivisionOrdinancesubjecttoconditionsenumerated
below;and
WHEREAS,RetailCommercialUsesarepermittedintheB-3HighwayBusinessDistrict,
theunderlyingzoningoftheparcel;and
WHEREAS,Chapter4,Section4.8,SubsectionG.(2)(iv.)providesforcrossaccess/parking
betweenadjoiningbusinesspropertiesandtheproposalmeetsthecriteriaoutlinedinthecity
codetoprovideforsuchusesubjecttotheconditionsenumeratedbelow;and
WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingonMay6th,2014onthe
applicationandtheapplicantandmembersofthepublicwereprovidedtheopportunityto
presentinformationtothePlanningCommission;and
WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionhasconsideredallofthecommentsandthestaff
report,whichareincorporatedbyreferenceintotheresolution;and
WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionoftheCityofMonticellomakesthefollowing
FindingsofFactinrelationtotherecommendationofapprovalofthepreliminaryandfinal
platandconditionalusepermit:
1.Thepreliminaryandfinalplatcreatesaparcelsuitableforcommercialdevelopment
inaB-3HighwayBusinessdistrictinaccordancewithTitleIX,Monticello
SubdivisionOrdinance.
2.TheproposeduseofthesiteforRetailCommercialUsesisapermitteduseintheB-3
HighwayBusinessZoningDistrict.
3.Thezoningordinanceprovidesforcrossaccess/parkingbetweenadjoiningbusiness
propertiesandsuchanarrangementinthislocationwillreducethenumberofaccess
drivesonCedarStreetenhancingtrafficsafetyandfacilitatevehicularcirculationon
thecommercialproperties.
4.Crossaccess/parkingatthislocationmeetsallrequiredconditionalusepermit
evaluationcriteriaasoutlinedinSection2.4(D)(4)(a)suchthat:
a.Theproposeduseisconsistentwiththeexistingandfuturelandusesinthe
areaandwillnotdiminishpropertyvaluesorbedetrimentaltothehealth,
safetyandwelfareofpersonsinthearea.
b.Theproposeduseisconsistentwiththeimprovementsandrequirementsfor
suchusesintheapplicablezoningdistrictandsufficientinfrastructureexists
orisproposedtoaccommodatetheusesuchasutilitiesandparkingand
loadingfacilities.
c.Theproposedusecanreasonablyoccupythesubjectpropertywithout
negativeimpactsonsurroundpropertiesorpublicfacilities.
5.Thecrossaccess/parkingproposalissubjecttoadditionalconditionsasoutlinedin
Chapter4,Section4.8,SubsectionG.(2)(iv.)andshallmeetthoseconditionsas
enumeratedbelow.
WHEREAS,aftertakingpubliccomment,thePlanningCommissionrecommendedapproval
oftheconditionalusepermitandpreliminaryandfinalplatoftheCedarStreetAdditionto
theCityCouncilperResolution2014-048;and
WHEREAS,theMonticelloCityCouncilreviewedtherecommendationofthePlanning
CommissiononMay27th,2014;
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA,thepreliminaryandfinalplatoftheCedarStreetAddition,withdrainageand
utilityeasementsasrequired,isherebyapprovedcontingentuponmeetingallconditionsof
thesubdivisionordinance;andthefollowingconditions:
1.Thefinalplatmustshowrequireddrainageandutilityeasementsaroundtheperimeter
oftheparcelandsucheasementsshallbededicatedtothecity.
2.Thefinalplatshallincludetheplattingofthefullright-of-wayforCedarStreet.
3.ThefinalplatshallincludeaneasementthroughOutlotAforDundasRoad.
4.Theproposedutility,grading,drainage,anderosioncontrolplansaresubjectto
reviewandcommentbytheCityEngineer.Theapplicantshallcomplywithall
recommendationsoftheCityEngineerasprovidedinthecommentletterdatedMay
1st,2014.
5.TheapplicantshallexecuteadevelopmentagreementcoveringthetermsoftheCity’s
PlatandCUPapproval.
6.Asidewalkconnectionmustbeinstalledbetweenthenortheastdriveaccessandnorth
propertyline.
7.AtrailconnectionmustbeprovidedfromtheparkinglottothetrailalongTH25.
8.Additionallandscapingmustbeprovidedatthesoutheastcornerofthepropertyto
ensuresufficientscreeningoftheloadingarea.
9.Alllandscapedareasmustbeirrigated.
10.Theapplicantmustobtainapprovalfromeasementholdersforallproposedtreeand
shrubplantingsineasementareas.
11.Thenortheastdrivewaymustberealignedperengineer’srequirements;ifparking
spacesareremovedasaresult,aproofofparkingareashouldbedesignatedonthe
site.
12.Encroachmentagreementsmustbefiledwiththecityforallareaswheredriveaisles
encroachondrainageandutilityeasements.
13.Futurecurbcutaccesslocationsbetweentheparcelinquestionandtheadjoining
propertytothenorthshallbesubjecttoreviewandapprovalbythecity.
14.Developershallenterintoasharedaccessandmaintenanceagreementwiththe
adjoiningpropertyownertothenorthtoberecordedagainstbothparcelsifatsuch
timetheparceltothenorthisdevelopedandrequirestwoaccesspointsfromCedar
Street,unlessalternativeaccessplansareotherwiseapprovedbytheCity.
NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA,theConditionalUsePermitforCrossAccess/Parkingisherebyapproved
contingentuponmeetingallconditionsofthesubdivisionordinance;andthefollowing
conditions:
1.Asidewalkconnectionmustbeinstalledbetweenthenortheastdriveaccessandnorth
propertyline.
2.AtrailconnectionmustbeprovidedfromtheparkinglottothetrailalongTH25.
3.Additionallandscapingmustbeprovidedatthesoutheastcornerofthepropertyto
ensuresufficientscreeningoftheloadingarea.
4.Alllandscapedareasmustbeirrigated.
5.Theapplicantmustobtainapprovalfromeasementholdersforallproposedtreeand
shrubplantingsineasementareas.
6.Thenortheastdrivewaymustberealignedperengineer’srequirements;ifparking
spacesareremovedasaresult,aproofofparkingareashouldbedesignatedonthe
site.
7.Encroachmentagreementsmustbefiledwiththecityforallareaswheredriveaisles
encroachondrainageandutilityeasements.
8.Futurecurbcutaccesslocationsbetweentheparcelinquestionandtheadjoining
propertytothenorthshallbesubjecttoreviewandapprovalbythecity.
9.Developershallenterintoasharedaccessandmaintenanceagreementwiththe
adjoiningpropertyownertothenorthtoberecordedagainstbothparcelsifatsuch
timetheparceltothenorthisdevelopedandrequirestwoaccesspointsfromCedar
Street,unlessalternativeaccessplansareotherwiseapprovedbytheCity.
BEITFURTHERRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFMONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA,thatthedocumenttitled“DevelopmentContractandConditionalUse
Permit,”withassignmentofthespecifictermsandconditionsforpublicimprovementsand
thespecifictermsandconditionsforplatdevelopment,isherebyapproved.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis27thdayofMay,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
_______________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
Project Narrative Goodwill, Monticello, MN April 4, 2014
Page 1 of 4
Project Narrative
Goodwill
2.64 Acre Site
Monticello, Minnesota
Land Use Application, Conditional Use Permit, Preliminary and Final Plat
April 4, 2014
____________
Introduction
On behalf of Goodwill Easter Seals of Minnesota, Oppidan, Inc. is submitting a Land Use
Application, Conditional Use Permit, Preliminary and Final Platfor the proposed project.
Goodwill has 30 locations around the Twin Cities such as, Woodbury, Maple Grove, Champlin,
Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, Rogers, Lakeville, and Eagan to name a few. Goodwill has elected
to pursue a location within the City of Monticello.
Goodwill / Easter Seals Minnesota have been a strong contributor to the development of
Minnesota’s workforce for more than 90 years. Goodwill / Easter Seals assist people with barriers
to education, employment and independence in achieving their goals.
Our comprehensive workforce development model helps clients:
-Prepare for work -Maintain employment
-Train for Employment -Advance in careers
-Obtain Jobs -Connect to other community resources
From 30 locations, Goodwill / Easter Seals 880 employees provide statewide services to
Minnesotans with disabilities and disadvantages. We provide paid work experience in our retail
stores and corporate headquarters. In addition to our career workforce development model, we
Project Narrative Goodwill, Monticello, MN April 4, 2014
Page 2 of 4
offer English Language Learning, mathematics, parenting and life skills classes. We also host
discussion groups devoted to the specific needs of the individuals we serve.
Goodwill / Easter Seals industry skills training programs, developed in partnership with
Minnesota businesses, provide curriculum-based, hands-on training. Current programs serve the
automotive, banking / finance, call center, construction and retail industries. Participants acquire
soft and technical skills to get jobs and advance in their careers.
Goodwill / Easter Seals long-term follow-up and support services help both participants and
employers. Our community resources staff provides housing resources, retail vouchers for
clothing, medical equipment loans and one-on-one assistance.
In 2013, Goodwill / Easter Seals served 22,165 individuals, provided 35,891 services, made 880
job placements with 113 individuals advancing in their careers and generated over 17 million in
taxable income by participants who gained employment.
Use
The tenant will utilize the facility for retailing purposes typically within the hours of operation
being Monday-Friday from 7:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Saturday from 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and
Sunday from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. These are standard hours of operation and do not take into
account various holiday hours which most retailers adjust slightly to better serve the community.
The proposed tenant would employ up to 30 employees along with 8-12 participants which are
engaging in career training programs. In addition this use works in conjunction with the retailers
that exist in the area. Each user will compliment each others product thus assisting in the success
of each others interest.
The donation Center will allow patrons to donate goods to the store by entering an enclosed are
on the west side of the building. Adequate staking for the vehicles is provided along the west
side of the building for waiting customers, along with a reliever route in case someone needs to
exit prior to making a donation. The donation process is handled within the structure, and in the
event any articles are left on the premises after hours they will be removed in the morning.
Site
The proposed project consists of constructing a 17,636 square foot retail facility on a 2.64 acre
site that is being platted. The property is currently zoned Commercial. The property is bordered
by Hwy 25 on the west and commercial parcels exist on the north and south sides. The site will
have parking on the north and east side of the store. A donation drop off will area located along
the west side of the building that will be fully enclosed with garage doors and be part of the main
structure.. A loading dock and trash compactor are located in the rear of the building.
Project Narrative Goodwill, Monticello, MN April 4, 2014
Page 3 of 4
Parking requirements for this facility are within the City Code. Parking is provided in the front,
rear and to the east of the store and consists of 89 stalls.
Stormwater is collected and sent to two different storm sewer lines in the street and the rear of the
store. Both of these lines collect the stormwater from the area and convey it to the west to a
regional treatment pond.
Water is looped through around the building from two existing stubs from Cedar Ave. The main
line is an 8 inch line with a 6 inch service to the building for fire and domestic service. A stub
was extended to the north for the future property to connect to for a looped connection. While
Sanitary will be connected to the existing stub to the property from Cedar.
Landscaping
Chapter 4.1 of the city code describes the landscaping requirements for the project. The
landscape plan provides 10 deciduous trees, 4evergreen trees, and 116 shrubs to meet the planting
requirements. This meets or exceeds the city requirement of 14 trees and 116 shrubs. The drop
off area is screened from Hwy 25 with a berm and shrubs as required by code, and the loading
dock is screened with evergreen trees in the SE corner of the site from Cedar.
Lighting
Site lighting is in accordance with Chapter 4.4 of the City Code. LED fixtures are proposed on
the building and metal haloid fixtures in the parking lot. All pole mounted lights are on 22 ft.
pole with three foot bases to for a maximum height of 25 ft., and all fixtures are full cutoff in
accordance with the lighting code. The photometric plan shows the public row does not have
more than 0.5 ft. candle in accordance with the lighting ordinance.
Architecture
The proposed design for the Goodwill Store incorporates architectural elements and finishes from
the typical Goodwill prototype building. The new building’s exterior is proposed to be a
combination of a face brick, EIFS (Exterior Insulation Finish System), and colored single score
CMU fields and accent elements. Columns with decorative EIFS cornices are used to define the
main entry to the facility. The proposed finishes are believed to meet the Standards Applicable to
All Commercial / Business Districts within the City of Monticello.
All HVAC units on the facility are proposed to be screened from the structures parapets. They are
designed high enough to screen all equipment.
Signage
Project Narrative Goodwill, Monticello, MN April 4, 2014
Page 4 of 4
Under the current terms of the proposed lease, signage is the responsibility of the Tenant. With
that said, typically the Tenant will locate signage over the front entry to the facility and on any
face of the building facing major roadways allowed by code. In addition, various directional
signage will be proposed around the development as found on most retail projects.
The Tenant is aware that a separate signage permit must be applied for and they are prepared to
do so per the requirements of the City of Monticello.
Closure
The applicant respectfully requests the City of Monticello to support the request for the proposed
Goodwill Project. We look forward to joining your community with a Goodwill store and
assisting residents with our mission.
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at MFRA, Inc.,
Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:MM/DD/YYYY42661
Michael C. Brandt
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
GEOTECHNICAL
BRAUN INTERTEC
11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE. S
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438
TEL 952-995-2000
FAX 952-995-2020
CONTACT: JOSH VAN ABEL
DEVELOPER/OWNER
OPPIDAN
5125 COUNTY ROAD 101, SUITE 100
MINNETONKA, MN 55345
TEL 952-294-0353
FAX 952-294-0151
CONTACT: PAT BARRETT
ARCHITECT
DJR ARCHITECTURE INC.
333 WASHINGTON AVE. N SUITE 210
UNION PLAZA, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
TEL 612-676-2736
FAX 612-676-2796
CONTACT: SCOTT NELSON
CIVIL ENGINEER
MFRA INC.
14800 28TH AVENUE, SUITE 140
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
TEL 763-476-6010
FAX 763-476-8532
CONTACT: MICHAEL C. BRANDT
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
MFRA INC.
14800 28TH AVENUE, SUITE 140
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
TEL 763-476-6010
FAX 763-476-8532
CONTACT: JIM KALKES
SURVEYOR
MFRA INC.
14800 28TH AVENUE, SUITE 140
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
TEL 763-476-6010
FAX 763-476-8532
CONTACT: MARCUS HAMPTON
SHEET INDEX
SHEET DESCRIPTION
C1.01 TITLE SHEET
C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C3.01 SITE PLAN
C4.01 GRADING PLAN
C5.01 EROSION CONTROL PHASE I
C5.02 EROSION CONTROL PHASE II
C5.03 EROSION CONTROL DETAIL
C6.01 UTILITY PLAN
C8.01 LIGHTING PLAN
C8.02 LIGHTING PLAN
C8.03 LIGHTING DETAILS
C9.01 DETAIL SHEET
C9.02 DETAIL SHEET
L1.01 LANDSCAPE PLAN
L1.02 SITE LANDSCAPE DETAILS
PRELIMINARY PLAT
for
Site Development Plans
Goodwill
Oppidan Investment Company, LLC.
Monticello, Minnesota
Presented by:
NO SCALE
VICINITY MAP
CONSULTANT CONTACT LIST:
May 16, 2014 - 2:13pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-C1-TITLE.dwg
C1.01
TITLE SHEETSITE
ST
R
E
E
T
P A R C E L A
PA
R
C
E
L
B
C
E
D
A
R
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Oppidan
Goodwill
Monticello
Monticello, MN
JRH
MFH 1201/19-21
4/3/14
OPP19940
FOUND MONUMENT
SET MONUMENT
MARKED LS 47481
ELECTRIC METER
LIGHT
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
WATERMAIN
FLARED END SECTION
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
AIR CONDITIONER
GUY ANCHOR
HANDICAP STALL
UTILITY POLE
POST
SIGN
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
GAS METER
EASEMENT LINE
SETBACK LINE
RESTRICTED ACCESS
BUILDING LINE
BUILDING CANOPY
CONCRETE CURB
BITUMINOUS SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE
LANDSCAPE SURFACE
DECIDUOUS TREE
CONIFEROUS TREE
OVERHEAD WIRE
CHAIN LINK FENCE
IRON FENCE
WIRE FENCE
WOOD FENCE
0
SCALE IN FEET
40 80
1. Subject property's address is unassigned, and the subject property is a portion of property with
property identification number 155500142400.
2. The gross area of the subject property is 2.64 Acres or 115,136 Square Feet.
3. The subject property is zoned B-3 Business District, per City of Monticello zoning map dated 3/1/13.
4. There are no buildings on the subject property.
PROPERTY SUMMARY
1.The property boundary and easements shown on this survey are per the "Certificate of Survey For
John Lundsten", prepared by Meyer-Rohlin, Inc., as file no. 06168 and dated 5/9/06.
2.Field work was completed on 3/20/2014.
SURVEY NOTES
LEGEND
VICINITY MAP
ED
M
O
N
S
O
N
A
V
E
DUNDAS RD
SCHOOL BLVD
CHELSEA RD
CE
D
A
R
S
T
SITE*
94
25
May 16, 2014 - 2:13pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Survey\19940-EX COND.dwg
C2.01
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
SCALE IN FEET
0 6030
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at MFRA, Inc.,
Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:MM/DD/YYYY42661
Michael C. Brandt
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 16, 2014 - 2:13pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-C3-SITE.dwg
C3.01
SITE PLAN
AREA
GROSS SITE AREA
BUILDING AREA
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA
PROPOSED PERCENT IMPERVIOUS
SETBACKS
FRONT YARD
REAR YARD
SIDE YARD
PARKING
ZONING
EXISTING ZONING
PROPOSED ZONING
PARKING SUMMARY
PARKING REQUIRED (1/200SF)
PARKING PROVIDED
PARKING STALL LENGTH
PARKING STALL WIDTH
PARKING ISLE WIDTH MINIMUM
EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY
PROJECTED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
ADDITIONAL CAREER TRAINING PARTICIPANTS
A.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.
B.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BACK OF CURB IS
SHOWN GRAPHICALLY ONLY.
C.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.
D.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
E.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE
LOCATIONS.
F.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PYLON SIGN DETAILS
G.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAIL AND FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF LIGHT
POLE.
H.REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, LOT NUMBERS, LOT AREAS, AND LOT DIMENSIONS.
I.ALL GRADIENTS ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE
OF 5% (1:20), EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:12), AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2.08% (1:48). THE
MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS ISLE SHALL BE 2.08% (1:48).
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES
PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER
IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD VERSUS THE DESIGN
GRADIENT.
J."NO PARKING" SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ALONG ALL DRIVEWAYS AS REQUIRED BY CITY.
K.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY.
L.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO THE HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL
PONDS.
I.CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH CITY OF MONTICELLO SPECIFICATIONS.
LEGEND
EASEMENT
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
SAWCUT LINE
NUMBER OF PARKING
STALLS PER ROW
SIGN
PIPE BOLLARD
HEAVY DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
CONCRETE PAVING
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
KEY NOTE
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
DEVELOPMENT NOTES
KEY NOTES
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
A.BUILDING, STOOPS, STAIRS - SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
B.B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER.
C.INTEGRAL SIDEWALK AND CURB.
D.TAPER CURB TO MATCH EXISTING.
E.CONCRETE APRON.
F.TAPERED CURB TRANSITION.
G.FLAT CURB SECTION.
H.POURED DOCK WALL - SEE ARCHITECTS PLANS.
I.ACCESSIBLE RAMP.
J.PIPE BOLLARD.
K."ONE WAY, DO NOT ENTER" SIGN
L."STOP" SIGN
M."ACCESSIBLE PARKING" SIGN
N.LOADING DOCK - SEE ARCHITECTS PLANS
O."ONE WAY" AND DONATION DROP-OFF SIGN.
P.SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NEEDED FOR PROPOSED
DRIVE. MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH NEW BITUMINOUS PAVING.
115,077 SF 2.64 AC
17,665 SF 0.41 AC
82,405 SF 1.89 AC
32,672 SF 0.75 AC
72%
30 FEET
30 FEET
20 FEET
6 FEET
B-3
B-3
89 STALLS
90 STALLS
18 FEET
9 FEET
26 FEET
30
8-12
SCALE IN FEET
0 6030
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at MFRA, Inc.,
Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:MM/DD/YYYY42661
Michael C. Brandt
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
STORM SEWER
902
SOIL BORINGS
1042.56
ST 5
GRADING NOTES
DRAINTILE
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL XX. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED
ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING
SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY
HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,
INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
D
A.PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PROPOSED CURB DENOTE
GUTTER GRADE.
B.KEdZdKZ^,>>Z s/ tWs D Ed'Z/ EdEKE^dZhd͞'hdd ZKhd͟t, Z td ZZ/E^tz&ZKD
hZ͘>>Kd, ZZ ^^,>> KE^dZhd ^͞'hdd Z/E͟hZ͘
C.ALL GRADIENTS ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5% (1:20),
EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:12), AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2.08% (1:48). THE MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY
DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS ISLE SHALL BE 2.08% (1:48). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND
VERIFY THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE
FIELD VERSUS THE DESIGN GRADIENT.
D.d, KEdZdKZ/^hd/KE d,d͞d, ^h^hZ& hd/>/dz/E&KZDd/KE^,KtEKEd, ^ W>E^/^hd/>/dz
QUALITY LEVEL ____________. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02
d/d> ͞^dEZ'h/ >/E ^&KZd, K>> d/KEE W/d/KEK& y/^d/E'^h^hZ& hd/>/dzd͘͟d,
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE
COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA AT
1-800-252-1166). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL
DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL
UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
E.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.
F.SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE
CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF
ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY
AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT
CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE
ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
G.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS
ENGINEER.
H.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND PARKING AREA
SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE
TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY
THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE
UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE SOILS ENGINEER.
I.REPLACE ALL SUBGRADE SOIL DISTURBED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION THAT HAVE BECOME UNSUITABLE AND WILL NOT
PASS A TEST ROLL. REMOVE UNSUITABLE SOIL FROM THE SITE AND IMPORT SUITABLE SOIL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO
THE OWNER.
J.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE
MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MN/DOT) STANDARDS.
I.CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH CITY OF MONTICELLO SPECIFICATIONS.
962.5
X
962.5
X
902
SPOT ELEVATION
CONTOUR
RIP RAP
OVERFLOW ELEV.
CURB & GUTTER
May 16, 2014 - 2:13pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-C4-GRDE.dwg
C4.01
GRADING PLAN
LEGEND
SCALE IN FEET
0 6030
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at MFRA, Inc.,
Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:MM/DD/YYYY42661
Michael C. Brandt
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 16, 2014 - 2:14pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-C5-EROS.dwg
C5.01
EROSION
CONTROL
PHASE I
* REFER TO SHEET C5.03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE
NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS
TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES
(SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS
OUTLINED IN THE SWPPP)
TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREA
DIRECTION OF
OVERLAND FLOW
TEMPORARY DIVERSION
DITCH
LIMITS OF DRAINAGE
SUB-BASIN
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 1
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 2
TEMPORARY STONE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
OVERFLOW ELEV.
902902CONTOUR
RIP RAP
CHECK DAM
PA-10
SILT FENCE
SOIL BORINGS ST-9
EXISTINGPROPOSED
STORM SEWER
CURB & GUTTER
DRAINTILE
PHASE I:
1.INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES.
2.PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA.
3.CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCES ON THE SITE.
4. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENTATION AND SEDIMENT TRAP BASINS.
5. HALT ALL ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT TO PERFORM
INSPECTION OF BMPs. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT STORM WATER
PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH ENGINEER AND ALL GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS
BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION.
6. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE.
7. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE.
8. START CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES.
PHASE II:
1.TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS.
2.INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS.
3.INSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES.
4.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.
5.PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING.
6.PAVE SITE.
7.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES.
8.COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING.
9.REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE IS
STABILIZED), IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT
SOIL EROSION / SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES
STRIP & STOCKPILE TOPSOIL
ROUGH GRADE / SEDIMENT CONTROL
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS
FOUNDATION / BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
SITE CONSTRUCTION
PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES
FINISH GRADING
LANDSCAPING / SEED / FINAL STABILIZATION
STORM FACILITIES
NOTE: CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE
THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL
THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP,
INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS,
SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE
NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL
REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE.
TSM
TS
SB
EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS
QUANTITIES
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
SILT FENCE LINEAR FEET 1,300
SILT DIKE LINEAR FEET X
BIO-ROLL LINEAR FEET X
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT 1
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-1)UNIT X
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-2)UNIT 1
SILT DIKE
BIO-ROLL
LEGEND
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
NOTE TO CONTRACTOR
D
AREA SUMMARY IN ACRES
PAVEMENT AREA ϭ͘ϰϬц
BUILDING AREA Ϭ͘ϰϭц
SEEDED AREA yy͘yyц
TOTAL DISTURBED Ϯ͘ϯϱц
PRE - CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS Ϭ͘ϬϬц
POST - CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS ϭ͘ϴϭц
SCALE IN FEET
0 6030
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at MFRA, Inc.,
Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:MM/DD/YYYY42661
Michael C. Brandt
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 16, 2014 - 2:14pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-C5-EROS.dwg
C5.02
EROSION
CONTROL
PHASE II
* REFER TO SHEET C5.03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE
NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS
TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES
(SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS
OUTLINED IN THE SWPPP)
TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREA
DIRECTION OF
OVERLAND FLOW
TEMPORARY DIVERSION
DITCH
LIMITS OF DRAINAGE
SUB-BASIN
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 1
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 2
TEMPORARY STONE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
OVERFLOW ELEV.
902902CONTOUR
RIP RAP
CHECK DAM
PA-10
SILT FENCE
SOIL BORINGS ST-9
EXISTINGPROPOSED
STORM SEWER
CURB & GUTTER
DRAINTILE
PHASE I:
1.INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES.
2.PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA.
3.CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCES ON THE SITE.
4. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENTATION AND SEDIMENT TRAP BASINS.
5. HALT ALL ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT TO PERFORM
INSPECTION OF BMPs. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT STORM WATER
PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH ENGINEER AND ALL GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS
BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION.
6. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE.
7. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE.
8. START CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES.
PHASE II:
1.TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS.
2.INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS.
3.INSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES.
4.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.
5.PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING.
6.PAVE SITE.
7.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES.
8.COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING.
9.REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE IS
STABILIZED), IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT
SOIL EROSION / SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES
STRIP & STOCKPILE TOPSOIL
ROUGH GRADE / SEDIMENT CONTROL
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS
FOUNDATION / BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
SITE CONSTRUCTION
PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES
FINISH GRADING
LANDSCAPING / SEED / FINAL STABILIZATION
STORM FACILITIES
NOTE: CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE
THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL
THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP,
INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS,
SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE
NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL
REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE.
TSM
TS
SB
EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS
QUANTITIES
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
SILT FENCE LINEAR FEET 1,260
SILT DIKE LINEAR FEET X
BIO-ROLL LINEAR FEET X
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT 1
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-1)UNIT X
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-2)UNIT 5
SILT DIKE
AREA SUMMARY IN ACRES
PAVEMENT AREA ϭ͘ϰϬц
BUILDING AREA Ϭ͘ϰϭц
SEEDED AREA yy͘yyц
TOTAL DISTURBED Ϯ͘ϯϱц
PRE - CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS Ϭ͘ϬϬц
POST - CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS ϭ͘ϴϭц
BIO-ROLL
LEGEND
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
NOTE TO CONTRACTOR
D
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at MFRA, Inc.,
Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:MM/DD/YYYY42661
Michael C. Brandt
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 16, 2014 - 2:14pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-C5-EROS.dwg
C5.03
EROSION
CONTROL
DETAIL
ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL
CONDITION UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. THE DESIGNATED CONTACT PERSON NOTED ON THIS PLAN MUST
ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION ON SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5
INCHES IN 24 HOURS. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
1.ALL SILT FENCES MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE.
THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS.
2.TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS MUST BE DRAINED AND THE SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES
1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME. DRAINAGE AND REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS (SEE PART
IV.D. OF THE GENERAL PERMIT).
3.SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, MUST BE INSPECTED FOR EVIDENCE OF SEDIMENT BEING DEPOSITED BY EROSION. THE
CONTRACTOR MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, AND
RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. THE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF DISCOVERY
UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED,
REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL,
REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK.
4.CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS MUST BE INSPECTED FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF-SITE SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO PAVED SURFACES. TRACKED SEDIMENT MUST BE
REMOVED FROM ALL OFF-SITE PAVED SURFACES, WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO COMPLY WITH PART IV.C.6 OF THE GENERAL
PERMIT.
5.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMPS, AS WELL AS ALL EROSION
PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS, FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORK AT THE SITE. THE PERMITTEE(S) ARE RESPONSIBLE UNTIL ANOTHER PERMITTEE
HAS ASSUMED CONTROL ACCORDING TO PART II.B.5 OVER ALL AREAS OF THE SITE THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FINALLY STABILIZED OR THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION,
AND A NOT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.
6.IF SEDIMENT ESCAPES THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, OFF-SITE ACCUMULATIONS OF SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED IN A MANNER AND AT A FREQUENCY SUFFICIENT TO MINIMIZE
OFF-SITE IMPACTS (E.G., FUGITIVE SEDIMENT IN STREETS COULD BE WASHED INTO STORM SEWERS BY THE NEXT RAIN AND/OR POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC
STREETS).
7.ALL INFILTRATION AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE THAT NO SEDIMENT FROM ONGOING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS REACHING THE INFILTRATION AREA AND THESE
AREAS ARE PROTECTED FROM COMPACTION DUE TO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT DRIVING ACROSS THE INFILTRATION AREA.
1.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. WHERE A CONFLICT EXISTS BETWEEN LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND MFRA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, THE MORE STRINGENT SPECIFICATION SHALL APPLY.
2.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATIONS AND/OR ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE
VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY
QUALITY LEVEL X. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND
DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL THE
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE
OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING MINNESOTA GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002
3.THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED UPON THE ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED UPON AN
ALTA OR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PREPARED BY ____ DATED XX-XX-XXXX. IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WITHOUT
EXCEPTION, THEY SHALL HAVE MADE, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. SEE ATTACHED
SURVEY SHEETS.
4.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS
PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES OCCURRING TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS
PROJECT.
5.THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) IS COMPRISED OF THIS DRAWING (EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN-ESC PLAN), THE STANDARD DETAILS,
THE PLAN NARRATIVE, AND ITS APPENDICES, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS.
6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETING & SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE MPCA GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ALL
CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. THE SWPPP AND ALL OTHER RELATED
DOCUMENTS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. (NOTE TO THE PREPARER: EDIT APPLICATION PROCESS PER PROJECT REQUIREMENTS)
7.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AS REQUIRED BY THE SWPPP & PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OVERSEE THE INSPECTION &
MAINTENANCE OF THE BMP'S AND EROSION PREVENTION FROM BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, IS APPROVED BY ALL AUTHORITIES,
THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE MPCA BY EITHER THE OWNER OR OPERATOR AS APPROVED ON PERMIT. ADDITIONAL BMP'S SHALL BE
IMPLEMENTED AS DICTATED BY CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. (NOTE TO THE PREPARER: REVISE INSPECTION
RESPONSIBILITY PER OPTIONS IN SWPPP NARRATIVE (SECTION 02370))
8.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH TRAINING REQUIREMENTS IN PART III.A.2 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT.
9.BMP'S AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL
CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER.
10.ESC PLAN MUST CLEARLY DELINEATE ALL STATE WATERS. PERMITS FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IMPACTING STATE WATERS OR REGULATED WETLANDS MUST BE
MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.
11.CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN
ON THE ESC PLANS SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED (E.G. WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.) ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS. GROUND DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES MUST NOT OCCUR OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
12.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING
AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES.
13.ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE AND SHALL BE CONTAINED AND
PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE.
14.ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK-PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER. A
COMPACTED CLAY LINER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW WASHOUT LIQUIDS TO ENTER GROUND WATER IS CONSIDERED AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. THE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST
NOT CONTACT THE GROUND, AND THERE MUST NOT BE RUNOFF FROM THE CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF
PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY TO INFORM CONCRETE EQUIPMENT OPERATORS
TO UTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES.
15.SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR
CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS.
16.DUST ON THE SITE SHALL BE CONTROLLED. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED.
17.SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT & CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION DEBRIS & OTHER WASTES
MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY & MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS.
18.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT & ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS
OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE & DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN
COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS.
19.ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THIS PLAN, AND IN THE SWPPP, SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AND PRIOR TO SOIL
DISTURBING ACTIVITIES UPSLOPE.
20.DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS STOPPED SHALL BE TEMPORARILY SEEDED, WITHIN 14 DAYS OF INACTIVITY. SEEDING SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SEED MIXTURE NUMBER 100 OR 110 DEPENDING ON THE SEASON OF PLANTING ( SEE MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3) SEEDING METHOD
AND APPLICATION RATE SHALL CONFORM TO MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3. TEMPORARY MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION
SECTION 2575.3F1 AND 2575.3G. ALTERNATIVELY, HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZER IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3H MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF
TEMPORARY MULCH.
21.DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TIME TABLE DESCRIBED ABOVE. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN AND/OR LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR VEGETATIVE COVER. (NOTE TO THE PREPARER: WHERE
PERMANENT SEEDING IS NOT CALLED OUT IN THE GRADING AND/ OR LANDSCAPE PLAN, REPLACE THE LAST SENTENCE IN THIS ITEM WITH THE FOLLOWING: SEED WET PONDS
WITH MN/DOT SEED MIXTURE 310 "NATIVE WET TALL" BELOW THE HWL. SEED ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SEED MIXTURE 260 "COMMERCIAL TURF". SEEDING METHOD AND
APPLICATION RATE SHALL CONFORM TO MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2573.3.)
22.CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES & FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE
USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BASINS. SEDIMENT MUST BE STABILIZED TO PREVENT IT FROM BEING WASHED BACK INTO THE BASIN, CONVEYANCES, OR
DRAINAGEWAYS DISCHARGING OFF-SITE OR TO SURFACE WATERS. THE CLEANOUT OF PERMANENT BASINS MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN THE BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY.
23.ON-SITE & OFF-SITE SOIL STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF BMP'S. STOCKPILE AND
BORROW AREA LOCATIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SITE MAP AND PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
24.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS & CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER
CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB & GUTTER SYSTEMS OR CONDUITS & DITCHES.
25.SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION DURING THE GRADING PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSION.
26.DUE TO THE GRADE CHANGES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (SILT
FENCES, CHECK DAMS, INLET PROTECTION DEVICES, ETC.) TO PREVENT EROSION.
27.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY, THIS INCLUDES BACKFILLING OF TRENCHES FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND PLACEMENT OF
GRAVEL OR BITUMINOUS PAVING FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION.
DEVELOPER/OWNER:
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXX-XXX-XXXX
SITE OPERATOR / GENERAL CONTRACTOR
SUPERINTENDENT:
CROSS BRACE
MI
N
.
15
"
18
"
MA
X
.
2" X 4" STAKE
3'
M
I
N
.
DROP INLET
WITH GRATE
2" X 4" WOOD FRAME
(TYP.)
5' MIN.
SECURELY FASTEN OVERLAPPING
ENDS OF SILT FENCE MATERIAL
TO ADJACENT STAKES WITH
THREE WIRE TIES OR OTHER
FASTENERS
ATTACH THE WOVEN WIRE
FENCE TO EACH POST WITH
THREE WIRE TIES OR OTHER
FASTENERS (SEE NOTE 1)
1. ATTACH THE WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO EACH POST AND THE GEOTEXTILE TO THE WOVEN WIRE FENCE
(SPACED EVERY 30") WITH THREE WIRE TIES OR OTHER FASTENERS, ALL SPACED WITHIN THE TOP 8" OF
THE FABRIC. ATTACH EACH TIE DIAGONALLY 45 DEGREES THROUGH THE FABRIC, WITH EACH PUNCTURE
AT LEAST 1" VERTICALLY APART.
2. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF SILT FENCE MATERIAL ADJOIN EACH OTHER, THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED
ACROSS TWO POSTS.
3. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NOTED IN THE SWPPP. DEPTH OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTS
MAY NOT EXCEED ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE FABRIC. MAINTENANCE CLEANOUT MUST BE
CONDUCTED REGULARLY TO PREVENT ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTS FROM REACHING ONE-HALF THE
HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE MATERIAL ABOVE GRADE.
4. ALL SILT FENCE INLETS SHALL INCLUDE WIRE SUPPORT.
OVERLAP
5' MIN.
SILT FENCE MATERIAL TO BE
FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN
WIRE FENCE WITH THREE TIES
SPACED AT 30" ON CENTER (SEE
NOTE 1)
DEFLECTOR PLATE
OVERFLOW 2 - TOP OF CURB BOX
OVERFLOW 1 - CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY
10" FILTER ASSEMBLY
CURB
CG 3067
HIGH-FLOW FABRIC
MIRAFI FF101
ROAD DRAIN CASTING APPLICABILTY
x NEENAH R-3067
x NEENAH R-3512
NOT TO SCALE
CONSTRUCT 2' HIGH BERM WITH
MAXIMUM SIDE SLOPE OF 4:1
2" TO 3" GRAVEL
NOTE: THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED
PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY SITE WORK THE ROCK
ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSPECTED FOLLOWING EACH
RAINFALL. MAINTENANCE OF THE ROCK ENTRANCES
SHALL INCLUDE A TOP DRESSING OF NEW GRAVEL, OR
REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF THE GRAVEL AS
NEEDED, TO KEEP THE ENTRANCE FREE FROM
COLLECTED MUD.
AS
REQU
I
R
E
D
UNDISTURBED SOIL
BACKFILL 6" X 6"
TRENCH
WOVEN MONOFILAMENT
GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL
DIRECTION OF
DRAINAGE
2" X 2" WOOD OR
STEEL T-POSTS
12
"
M
I
N
.
8' X 8' MIN OR AS
REQUIRED TO
CONTAIN WASTE
CONCRETE
SIGN TO INDICATE THE
LOCATION OF THE CONCRETE
WASHOUT AREA
2'-0" MIN
BERM AROUND PERIMETER
GROUND SURFACE
12" MIN
12" MIN
COMPACTED EMBANKMENT
MATERIAL (TYP.)3:1 OR FLATTER
SIDE SLOPES
NOTES:
1.CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY CONCRETE PLACEMENT
ON SITE.
2.CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE LINED WITH MINIMUM 10 MIL THICK PLASTIC
LINER.
3.VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL IS REQUIRED IF ACCESS TO CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA IS
OFF PAVEMENT.
4.SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED AT THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, AT THE WASHOUT AREA,
AND ELSEWHERE AS NECESSARY TO CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE
CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA TO OPERATORS OF CONCRETE TRUCKS AND PUMP RIGS.
5.THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE REPAIRED AND ENLARGED OR CLEANED OUT
AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN CAPACITY FOR WASTED CONCRETE.
6.AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE
AND DISPOSED OF AT AN ACCEPTED WASTE SITE.
7.WHEN THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA IS REMOVED, THE DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE
SEEDED AND MULCHED OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED IN A MANNER ACCEPTED BY THE
CITY.
WOVEN WIRE
FENCE WITH SILT
FENCE MATERIAL
COVER
EXTEND WIRE FENCE
A MIN. OF 3" INTO
GROUND
EXTEND SILT FENCE
MATERIAL A MIN. OF
1'-0" INTO GROUND
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS / "SITE MAP"
SITE LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
USGS MAP
GENERAL EROSION NOTES:
MAINTENANCE NOTES:
NOT TO SCALE
ROCK ENTRANCE DRIVE
NOT TO SCALE
SILT FENCE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA
ROAD DRAIN INLET PROTECTION (IP-2)SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION (IP-1)
NOT TO SCALE
POSTS: 2 X 4 WOODEN STAKE FENCE:
WOVEN WIRE, 14-1/2 GA., 6" MAX. MESH
OPENING FABRIC: IN ACCORDANCE WITH
ASTM D 6461 LATEST EDITION.
NOT TO SCALE
SITE
SITE
SCALE IN FEET
0 6030
A.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
VESTIBULE, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT
BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.
B.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING
UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES
AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED
ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY
AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT
SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH
CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL
UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT
(651)454-0002.
C.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO
ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL
BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.
D.SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION
PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON
THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE
WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING
HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE
CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE
CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
E.ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED
BENEATH THE SOD.
F.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO
CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL
CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS.
G.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND
PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A
GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER
AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL
DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE
SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS
ENGINEER.
H.THE CONTRACTOR AND THEIR SUPPLIER SHALL DETERMINE THE MINIMUM DIAMETER REQUIRED FOR
EACH STORM SEWER STRUCTURE.
I.CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH CITY OF MONTICELLO SPECIFICATIONS.
J.WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM 7.5 FEET OF COVER.
TELEPHONE
ELECTRIC
GAS LINE
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
EASEMENT
WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER
EXISTINGPROPOSED
STORM SEWER
CURB & GUTTER
DRAINTILE
D
S S
SLS
LEGEND
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES
STORM SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE
NUMBER TYPE CASTING*
*INDICATES NEENAH FOUNDRY CASTING NO., OR APPROVED EQUAL
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR AND THEIR SUPPLIER SHALL DETERMINE THE MINIMUM DIAMETER
REQUIRED FOR EACH STORM SEWER STRUCTURE.
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL XX. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED
ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING
SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY
HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,
INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at MFRA, Inc.,
Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:MM/DD/YYYY42661
Michael C. Brandt
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 16, 2014 - 2:14pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-C6-UTIL.dwg
C6.01
UTILITY PLAN
SCALE IN FEET
0 6030
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 16, 2014 - 2:14pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-C8-LGT.dwg
C8.01
LIGHTING PLAN
Calculation Summary
Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min
ALL AREA Illuminance Fc 1.25 6.2 0.0 N.A.N.A.
FRONT PARKING ONLY Illuminance Fc 2.23 4.7 0.9 2.48 5.22
SIDE PARKING ONLY Illuminance Fc 2.63 6.2 1.4 1.88 4.43
FIXTURES MUST BE THE FOLLOWING:
Qty Symbol Label Description Arrangement LLF Lum. Lumens Lum. Watts BUG Rating
4 A LEOTEK AR18-30M-MV-NW-5-DB-700-MODALD/22' HAPCO POLE SINGLE 0.850 23061 246.25 B4-U0-G2
2 B LEOTEK AR18-30M-MV-NW-3-DB-700-MODALD/22' HAPCO POLE SINGLE 0.850 22283 245.58 B3-U0-G3
16 W LEOTEK LWS1-090-MV-NW-3M-DB-MODALD (WALL MTD)SINGLE 0.850 5473 73 B2-U0-G2
MOUNT HEIGHT
Lum No Label Z
1 A 25
2 A 25
3 A 25
4 A 25
5 B 25
6 B 25
7 W 13.5
8 W 13.5
9 W 13.5
10 W 13.5
11 W 13.5
12 W 13.5
13 W 13.5
14 W 13.5
15 W 13.5
16 W 13.5
17 W 13.5
18 W 13.5
19 W 13.5
20 W 13.5
21 W 13.5
22 W 13.5
ALD,Inc.
ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING DESIGNS,INC.
2920 ANTHONY LANE
ST. ANTHONY, MN 55418
612-252-4100, 612-252-4141 fax
CONTACT: SCOTT HARMES
sharmes@aldmpls.com
Date:4/5/2014
DISCLAIMER:
THIS LIGHTING PLAN SPECIFIES LUMINAIRES SUPPLIED BY ALD. ANY DEVIATION FROM THIS
PLAN OR USE OF LUMINAIRES OTHER THAN SPECIFIED ALD PRODUCTS WILL REQUIRE FULL
SUBMITTAL OF FIXTURE SAMPLE, DRAWINGS, AND LIGHTING PLAN TO CITY, ENGINEER AND
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR PRIOR APPROVAL.
THESE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT VALID FOR OWNER OR CITY APPROVAL USING ANY "NON-ALD
REPRESENTED PRODUCT" OR FIXTURES NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. FIXTURES MUST BE
PROVIDED BY ALD.
CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN PERFORMED WITH OUR BEST INTERPRETATION OF THE DETAILS
GIVEN TO US. SOME DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEASURED AND CALCULATED RESULTS MAY
OCCUR DUE TO INTOLERANCE'S IN CALCULATION METHODS, TESTING PROCEDURES,
COMPONENT PERFORMANCE, MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES AND FIELD CONDITIONS SUCH
AS VOLTAGE, TEMPERATURE VARIATIONS, LAMP MANUFACTURER VARIATIONS, AND OTHER
VARIABLES. CALCULATIONS DO NOT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION OBJECTS SUCH AS, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, TREES, BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, OR CARS. CALCULATION VALUES
REPRESENT HORIZONTAL (I.E. LIGHT METER FACING STRAIGHT UP) LUMINANCE FC LEVELS
(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED). IF THE REAL ENVIRONMENT CONDITIONS DO NOT MATCH THE
INPUT DATA, DIFFERENCES WILL OCCUR BETWEEN MEASURED VALUES AND CALCULATED
VALUES. ALD IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ACQUIRING OR INTERPRETING ANY LOCAL LIGHTING
CODES.
TYPE W
FULL CUTOFF FIXTURES COORDINATE
MOUNT HEIGHT w/ARCHITECT. 5 YEAR
WARRANTY.
TYPES A,B
FULL CUTOFF FIXTURES 22' TALL POLE,
3' TALL CONCRETE BASE. 10 YEAR
WARRANTY.
MAINTAINED LIGHT LEVELS AT 0' HIGH USING FULL LED
CUTOFF FIXTURES SHOWN ON SCHEDULE. 22' TALL
HAPCO POLE, 3' TALL CONCRETE BASE.
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at MFRA, Inc.,
Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:MM/DD/YYYY42661
Michael C. Brandt
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 16, 2014 - 2:14pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-C9-DETL.dwg
C9.01
DETAIL SHEET
N.T.S.
SLOPE 3/4" PER FT.
1
3
13
-
1
/
2
"
6"
6"
6"8"12"
3" R
7"
2"2"
2"
1/2" R
1/2" R
2 - #4 REINFORCING RODS AT CATCH BASINS
20 FEET IN LENGTH, CENTERED ON THE STRUCTURE
01 B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
PAVEMENT EDGE
CONTRACTION JOINT
2'-0"
3'-0"
M
I
N
N.T.S.
08 END SECTION CURB & GUTTER
A
PLAN VIEW OF RAMP
A
ELEVATION OF RAMP
SECTION A-A
0.08 FT. PER FT. S
L
O
P
E
O
R
F
L
A
T
T
E
R
2
CONCRETE WALK
DOME (TYP)
2'
-
0
"
5/8" MIN5/8" MIN
1-5/8" - 2-3/8"1-5/8" - 2-3/8"
7/8" - 1-7/16"
1/
5
"
50% - 65% OF
BASE DIAMETER
CONCRETE WALK
5'-4"CURB OR CURB
AND GUTTER
16'-6"
6'-3"4'6'-3"2 6 2
BACK OF CURB
FRONT FACE OF CURB
6'-3"4'-0"6'-3"
6 22
6"
5'
-
4
"
2
4'
-
0
"
4'-0"
4'
-
0
"
M
I
N
4'-0
"
M
I
N
5'-8"5'-8"
3'-8"3'-8"
C
U
R
B
R
A
D
I
U
S
N.T.S.
03 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP
8"
16
"
ϰϱ
Σ
Ζ
*6
"
2"VARIES
SLOPE @ 2.00%
4"
4"
N.T.S.
02 INTEGRAL SIDEWALK CURB
STANDARD
STALL ADA STALL
ACCESS
ISLE ADA STALL
STANDARD
STALL
6"
2'
PLAN VIEW OF ADA PARKING
SECTION A-A
SECTION B-B
B
B
AA
N.T.S.
06
C L
6" SCH. 40 STEEL PIPE
FILLED W/ CONC. WITH
TOP ROUNDED.
PAVEMENT OR
FINISHED GRADE
4'
-
0
"
3" COVER
OVER FOOTING
FILL POST w/
CONCRETE
3500 PSI P.C. CONCRETE
MINIMUM (TYP.)
2'-0"
3"
M
I
N
.
ALL PIPES SHALL BE
PAINTED TRAFFIC
YELLOW
1'-6"
SY
M
.
A
B
O
U
T
C L
WH
E
N
I
N
G
R
O
U
P
S
8'
-
0
"
N.T.S.
07
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at MFRA, Inc.,
Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:MM/DD/YYYY42661
Michael C. Brandt
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 16, 2014 - 2:15pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-C9-DETL.dwg
C9.02
DETAIL SHEET
6" GATE VALVE-
RESILIENT WEDGE TYPE
OR APPROVED EQUAL.
MEGALUG
UNDISTURBED
SOIL CONCRETE BLOCK
CONCRETE
BLOCK
MEGALUG
1 CUBIC YARD
GRAVEL OR CRUSHED
ROCK WITH 2 LAYERS
4 MIL.
POLYETHYLENE.
FINISHED BOULEVARD GRADE
2-1/2" HOSE CONNECTION
(NATIONAL STANDARD THREAD)
CAPS TO BE CHAINED (PENTAGON
NUT ON CAPS)
4-1/2" PUMPER CONNECTION
(NATIONAL STANDARD THREAD)
NATIONAL STANDARD OPERATING NUT
"HYDRAFINDER"
PROPERTY
LINE
N.T.S.
01 TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT AND
GATE VALVE INSTALLATION
CONCRETE BLOCKING CONCRETE BLOCKING
MJ TEE
CONCRETE
BLOCKING AS
PER SPECS.
UNDISTURBED
SOIL
UNDISTURBED SOIL
CONCRETE BLOCKING
MJ BEND
N.T.S.
03 TYPICAL WATERMAIN BLOCKING N.T.S.
02 GATE VALVE & BOX INSTALLATION
XX" (DIP OR PVC)
WYE
ϰϱΣ>KE'Z/h^
BEND
CONCRETE
6" D.I.P. CLEANOUT STACK
FEMALE ADAPTOR
DUCTILE IRON
THREADED PLUG
PLACE CASTING R-1976 OR
APPROVED EQUAL ON CLEANOUTS
IN PAVED AREAS
FINISHED GRADE
N.T.S.
06 TYPICAL CLEANOUT
SLOPE TRENCH
SIDES PER OSHA
REQUIREMENTS
SLOPE TRENCH
SIDES PER OSHA
REQUIREMENTS
N.T.S.
BASE: PRECAST CONCRETE
FLOW
STEPS 16" O.C. ON
DOWNSTREAM SIDE
27"
*
N.T.S.
07 STORM SEWER MANHOLE
4' DIA. M.H.-9" IN FROM BACK OF CURB
6' DIA. M.H.-3" BEHIND BACK OF CURB
8' DIA. M.H.-15" BEHIND BACK OF CURB
DIMENSION FROM BACK OF CURB
TO CENTER OF PIPE. FOR A 24"
GRATE OPENING.
24"X 36" SLAB OPENING
PROVIDE 27" DIAMETER OPENING IF ROUND
CASTING TO BE PROVIDED. SEE STORM
SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR
DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB TO
CENTER OF STRUCTURE.
NOTE: SEE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE
SCHEDULE FOR CASTING TYPE.
ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAVE
"O" RING RUBBER GASKETS.
DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON
BOTH THE OUTSIDE AND THE INSIDE.
PIPE
D
I
A
M
E
T
E
R
VA
R
I
A
B
L
E
6"
6"
VARIABLE
5"
1'
-
4
"
9"
N.T.S.
04 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE
2.0"-MNDOT 2360 MVNW35035B*
6"-CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED
2.0"-MNDOT 2360 MVWE35035B*
TACK COAT - 2357
5" CONCRETE, 4000 PSI 28 DAY STRENGTH
7"-CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED
2.0"-MNDOT 2360 MVNW35035B*
5"-CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED
1.5"-MNDOT 2360 MVWE35035B*
Tack Coat - 2357
N.T.S.
04
05 SANITARY SEWER BEDDING
CONCRETE
GRANULAR BASE
PAVING
ONE WRAP OF #30
ROOFING FELT
ϲΗT^,͘ϰϬ^d >
PIPE-FILL WITH CONC.
4" x 4" STEEL TUBE
(SEE SIGN DETAILS
THIS SHEET)
STANDARD MNDOT
SIGN NO. R7.8A
1.5'
PROVIDE VAN
ACCESSIBLE SIGN AT
RIGHT HAND
DISCHARGE PARKING
SPACES
N.T.S.
05
SCALE IN FEET
0 6030
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
This certification is not valid unless wet signed in blue
ink. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of
this survey which is available upon request at MFRA,
Inc., Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:2014/04/0245071
James A. Kalkes
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 16, 2014 - 2:15pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-L1-LAND.dwg
L1.01
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
QUANTITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE.
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
x OVERSTORY TREES
xx 10.0 ACI OF CANOPY TREES (INCLUDING 1 EVERGREEN TREE) PER ACRE
xxx 2.64 ACRES X 10 =26.4 (/2.0aci) = 13.2 OVERSTORY TREES
x UNDERSTORY SHRUBS
xx 2 SHRUBS FOR EVERY 10FT OF BUILDING PERIMITER
xxx ((580LF / 10)*2)=116 UNDERSTORY SHRUBS
=116 UNDERSTORY SHRUBS
CITY LANDSCAPE CODE
BOTANICAL NAME
DECIDUOUS TREES
KEY COMMON NAME
2"BB 3
SIZE ROOT QTY.
Gleditsia triacanthos
SHADEMASTER HONEYLOCUST
2"BB 2Celtis occidentalis HACKBERRY
var. inermis 'Shademaster'HL
HB
ORNAMENTAL TREES
SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE 1.5"BB 2Malus x 'Spring Snow'SS
EVERGREEN TREES
BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6'BB 3Picea glauca var. DensataBH
FU
L
L
F
O
R
M
TO
G
R
A
D
E
1COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 6'BBPicea pungensCB
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
ST
R
A
I
T
L
E
A
D
E
R
N
O
"
V
"
C
R
O
T
C
H
2"BB 3Acer saccharum SUGAR MAPLESM
INSTALL
HEIGHT
MATURE
HEIGHT
10'50'
15'50'
14'50'
6'40'
6'55'
8'25'
COMMERCIAL TURF - SOD HIGHLAND SOD
COMMERCIAL TURF - SEED MN SEED MIX 25-131 (OLD MNDOT 260)
W/ "NO MOW FESCUE MIX"
HARDWOOD MULCH (NATURAL COLOR)
SHREADED HARDWOOD MULCH
1/2" CRUSHED GRANITE CRUSHED QUARRY GRANITE
MNDOT 260 MNDOT 260 &
ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY W/ "NO MOW FESCUE MIX
CONSTRUCTION NOT INTENDED (USE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
SODDED, OR RETENTION BASINS FOR SLOPES OVER 3:1)
** NO MOW SEED FORMULA FROM SPECIALTY TURF & AG INC, FREEDOM MIX, AT 200LB/ACRE OR
APPROVED EQUAL. - WWW.SPECIALTYTURFAG.COM - 188-685-4521
SEED MIX LEGEND
(FOR ALL SHEETS)
SEED MIXTYPESYM.
HB
2
964
DONATION
CENTER
96
5
9
6
5
BH
9
6
5
96
5
96
6
9
6
7
9
6
8
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
This certification is not valid unless wet signed in blue
ink. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of
this survey which is available upon request at MFRA,
Inc., Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:2014/04/0245071
James A. Kalkes
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 16, 2014 - 2:15pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-L1-LAND.dwg
L1.02
SITE
LANDSCAPE
DETAILS
Euonymus alatus 'Compactus'DWARF BURNING BUSH #5 CONT.DBB 26
SHRUBS
BOTANICAL NAMEKEY COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT QTY.REMARKS
Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low'GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT.GLS 17
#5 CONT.SVJ 8
#5 CONT.SMS 3
Spiraea x bumalda 'Anthony Waterer'ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA #5 CONT.16AWS
Juniperious Horizoantalis 'Savin'SAVIN JUNIPER
Spiraea nipponica 'Snowmound'SNOWMOUND SPIREA
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
Syringa x "Bailsugar'SUGAR PLUM LILAC #5 CONT.SPF 13
#5 CONT.12GOLD FLAME SPIREASpiraea x bumalda 'Gold Flame'
1.5'4'x4'
INSTALL
HEIGHT
MATURE
HEIGHT
1'3'x4'
1'2.5'x5'
1.5'3'x4'
1.5'3'x4'
1.5'3'x4'
1.5'4'x4'
GFS
4
NE PARKING ISLAND1
L1.02
NORTHSCALE 1" = 10'
QUANTITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE.
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
#5 CONT.ALPINE CURRANTRibes alpinum 1.5'3'x4'ALP
NW PARKING ISLAND2
L1.02
NORTHSCALE 1" = 10'
SE PARKING ISLAND3
L1.02
NORTHSCALE 1" = 10'
SW PARKING ISLAND4
L1.02
NORTHSCALE 1" = 10'
NW BUILDING CORNER6
L1.02
NORTHSCALE 1" = 10'
NE BUILDING CORNER7
L1.02
NORTHSCALE 1" = 10'
EAST OF BUILDING8
L1.02
NORTHSCALE 1" = 10'
W OF BUILDING5
L1.02 SCALE 1" = 10'
FRONT BERM9
L1.02
NORTHSCALE 1" = 10'
#5 CONT.9 1'3'x4'MYS Spiraea thunbergii 'Ogon'MELLOW YELLOW SPIREA
Lonicera x xylosteoides 'Miniglobe'MINIGLOBE HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT.MGH 1.5'4'x4'9
SCALE IN FEET
0 6030
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
C
OPP19940
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
This certification is not valid unless wet signed in blue
ink. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of
this survey which is available upon request at MFRA,
Inc., Plymouth, MN office.
Registration No.Date:2014/04/0245071
James A. Kalkes
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
C 05/16/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 16, 2014 - 2:15pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-L1-LAND.dwg
l2.01
SITE
IRRIGATION
PLAN
MAXIMUM LATERAL LENGTH (FEET)
MAXIMUM FLOW PER ZONEGRID PRECIPITATION RATES (IN/HR)
END FEED EXAMPLE
LATERAL FLOW PER 100 FT (GPM)
CENTER FEED EXAMPLE
SCALE IN FEET
0 6030
Client
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
GOODWILL
MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
MCB JTA
MCB
04/07/2014
B
OPP19940
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at MFRA, Inc.,
Plymouth, MN office.
MM/DD/YYYY42661
Michael C. Brandt
A 04/09/14 EAV ADDITIONAL INFO
B 05/02/14 EAV CITY COMMENTS
May 02, 2014 - 1:51pm - User:549 L:\PROJECTS\OPP19940\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\19940-C3-SITE.dwg
C3.02
TRUCK TURN
PLAN
LEGEND
GO
O
D
W
I
L
L
Mo
n
t
i
c
e
l
l
o
,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
Exterior Perspective
4-
1
-
2
0
1
4
114-0021
GO
O
D
W
I
L
L
Mo
n
t
i
c
e
l
l
o
,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
Exterior Elevations
4-
1
-
2
0
1
4
EIFS COLOR 2 EIFS COLOR 1 UTILITY FACE BRICK COLOR 2 114-0021PREFINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING
PR
E
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
F
L
U
S
H
S
E
A
M
ME
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
C
A
N
O
P
Y
SI
G
N
A
G
E
B
Y
T
E
N
A
N
T
SI
G
N
A
G
E
B
Y
T
E
N
A
N
T
SI
G
N
A
G
E
B
Y
T
E
N
A
N
T
EIFS COLOR 1 PREFINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING EIFS COLOR 1 UTILITY FACE BRICK COLOR 2 SINGLE SCORED BURNISHED BLOCK COLOR 1 SINGLE SCORED BURNISHED BLOCK COLOR 1 SINGLE SCORED BURNISHED BLOCK COLOR 1 SINGLE SCORED BURNISHED BLOCK COLOR 1 UTILITY FACE BRICK COLOR 2 UTILITY FACE BRICK COLOR 2 PREFINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING EIFS COLOR 1 PREFINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING OVERHEAD DOORS
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
B
A
S
E
OV
E
R
H
E
A
D
D
O
O
R
1” INSULATED ALUMINUM GLAZING 1” INSULATED ALUMINUM GLAZING EIFS COLOR 2 EIFS COLOR 2
F:\CityClerk\agendas\CouncilAgendas\2014CouncilAgendas\05-27-14\7Ag-WSBLTR-aschumann-Goodwill050114.doc
Infrastructure Engineering Planning Construction701XeniaAvenueSouth
Suite300
Minneapolis,MN55416
Tel:763541-4800
Fax:763541-1700
May1,2014
Ms.AngelaSchumann
CommunityDevelopmentDirector
CityofMonticello
505WalnutStreet,Suite1
Monticello,MN55362
Re:Oppidan(Goodwill-PlanReview
WSBProjectNo.1494-890
DearMs.Schumann:
Wehavereviewedthesitedevelopmentplans,datedApril9,2014,aspreparedbyMFRA,Inc,
andofferthefollowingcomments.
ExistingConditions
1.Theexistingstormsewerpipelocatedinthesouthwestcornerofthesiteshouldbeshown
ontheplans.
SitePlan
1.Thenortheastdriveaisleshouldbeshiftedtothewesttoprovidealongerentrance
approachtoCedarStreetforcirculationpurposes.Theapproachlengthshouldmatchthe
southerlydrivewayentrance.
2.Sidewalkshouldextendtothenortherlypropertyline.ADApedestrianrampsshouldbe
installedwherethesidewalkintersectsbothdrivewayentrances.
3.TheCity’ssidewalkdetailplateshallbeincludedintheplans.
4.Provideestimatedtrafficprojectionsofvehicleandtrucktripsanticipatedtoaccessthe
site.
GradingPlan
1.Labeltheproposedstormsewerpipesizesandcatchbasintopandinvertelevationson
thegradingplan.
2.Identifyallemergencyoverflowroutesandelevationsforeachcatchbasinonthegrading
plan.TheEOFshouldbeaminimumof1.5’belowthelowbuildingopening.
Ms.AngelaSchumann
April30,2014
Page2
F:\CityClerk\agendas\CouncilAgendas\2014CouncilAgendas\05-27-14\7Ag-WSBLTR-aschumann-Goodwill050114.doc
3.IdentifyboulevardgradesbetweentheproposedsidewalkandexistingCedarStreet
curbline.
4.Labelthe%gradeswithdrainagearrowsatthetwoaccesspointsfromCedarStreet.
UtilityPlan
1.EliminateconstructingMH01overtheexistingstormsewerandextendstormsewer
fromCB02toCB06instead.
2.Labeltheproposedinvertelevationwherethestormsewerconnectstotheexisting
manholeatthesouthwestcornerofthesite.Theas-builtinvertelevationis947.25.
3.Loopingofthewatermainwithinthesiteisnotneededaslongastheapplicant
determinesthatexistingwaterpressuresandfireflowsarenotadequatetoservethesite.
4.Thewatermainstubtothepropertytothenorthisnotrequired.
5.Labeltheexistinggatevalvelocationontheexistingwatermainstub.Verifyitwillbe
containedwithinthedrainageandutilityeasement.
6.Thereisnotanexistingwatermainstubasidentifiedontheplansadjacenttothe
proposednortherlydrivewayaccess.
7.Showtheirrigationconnectiontothewatermainandirrigationlayoutontheplans.
8.Theproposedwaterserviceshallbeinstalledwithaminimum7.5feetofcover.
9.Sanitarysewercleanoutsarerequiredatamaximum70-footinterval,thereforean
additionalcleanoutshouldbeaddedalongtheserviceline.
10.AutilityexcavationpermitmustbeobtainedfromthePublicWorksdepartmentpriorto
commencementofutilityconnections.
11.Provideanas-builtutilityplanonceconstructioniscomplete.
StormwaterCalculations
1.Provideproposedcatchbasininletcapacitycalculations.Catchbasinsshouldbe
designedwithsufficientcapacitytolimitpondingtomaximumdepthof0.3feetfora10-
yearrainfallevent.
2.Provideadrainageareamap.
Ms.AngelaSchumann
April30,2014
Page3
F:\CityClerk\agendas\CouncilAgendas\2014CouncilAgendas\05-27-14\7Ag-WSBLTR-aschumann-Goodwill050114.doc
PreliminaryPlat
1.Providean80-footwideroadway,drainageandutilityeasementforDundasRoadwithin
OutlotA.
2.ProviderequiredperimeterdrainageandutilityeasementsforLot1,Block1.
3.ItshouldbenotedthatafuturesidewalkextensionalongtheeastsideofCedarStreetis
plannedwiththedevelopmentofOutlotA.Theapplicantcanopttoprovideadditional
rightofwaytoaccommodatethisfuturesidewalknoworprovideitinthefutureasright
ofwayoreasementwiththedevelopmentofOutlotA.
Pleasehavetheapplicantprovideawrittenresponseaddressingthecommentsabove.Final
constructionplanswillneedtobesubmitted,reviewed,andapprovedpriortobuildingpermit
approval.Pleasegivemeacallat763-271-3236ifyouhaveanyquestionsorcomments
regardingthisletter.Thankyou.
Sincerely,
WSB&Associates,Inc.
ShibaniK.Bisson,PE
CityEngineer
cc:SteveGrittman,NAC
skb
May 16, 2014
Ms. Angela Schumann
Community Development Director
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Oppidan (Goodwill - Plan Review)
The following are responses to each of the requested site plan and preliminary plat changes.
Existing Conditions
1. The existing storm sewer pipe located in the southwest corner of the site should be shown
on the plans.
The existing pipe has been added.
Site Plan
1. The northeast drive aisle should be shifted to the west to provide a longer entrance
approach to Cedar Street for circulation purposes. The approach length should match the
southerly driveway entrance.
The drive isle has been shifted. The length is now equal to or greater than the south
approach.
2. Sidewalk should extend to the northerly property line. ADA pedestrian ramps should be
installed where the sidewalk intersects both driveway entrances.
Sidewalk now extends to the northerly property line. ADA ramps are now indicated at
each crossing of the entrances.
3. The City’s sidewalk detail plate shall be included in the plans.
The City’s sidewalk detail plate is now included in the plans.
4. Provide estimated traffic projections of vehicle and truck trips anticipated to access the
site.
Estimated traffic projections are as follows:
Based on trip generation estimates of average count data from two existing nearby
Goodwill locations, the following traffic trip generation estimates were found.
Land Use
Type (ITE
Code)
P.M. In-Store P.M. Donation
Drop Off
Total P.M. Trips Daily
Trips
In Out In Out In Out
Observation
Existing
Maple
Grove
Goodwill
53
47 17 17 70 64 -
Existing
Hopkins
Goodwill
40 54 24 24 64 78 -
ITE Trip Estimate
Average 47 51 20 20 67 71 -
Proposed
Goodwill*
- - - - 51 51 1,179
*The ITE trip generation estimate is based off a “Free Standing Discount Store”
Grading Plan
1. Label the proposed storm sewer pipe sizes and catch basin top and invert elevations on
the grading plan.
The top and invert elevations have been included in the grading plan.
2. Identify all emergency overflow routes and elevations for each catch basin on the grading
plan. The EOF should be a minimum of 1.5’ below the low building opening.
All of the EOFs have been added to the grading plan.
3. Identify boulevard grades between the proposed sidewalk and existing Cedar Street
curbline.
The percent grades have been added between the sidewalk and the existing Cedar Street
curbline.
4. Label the % grades with drainage arrows at the two access points from Cedar Street.
The grades at the entrance drives have been labeled.
Utility Plan
1. Eliminate constructing MH 01 over the existing storm sewer and extend storm sewer
from CB 02 to CB 06 instead.
Storm sewer has been revised.
2. Label the proposed invert elevation where the storm sewer connects to the existing
manhole at the southwest corner of the site. The as-built invert elevation is 947.25.
Invert elevation has been added.
3. Looping of the watermain within the site is not needed as long as the applicant
determines that existing water pressures and fire flows are not adequate to serve the site.
Watermain is no longer looped.
4. The watermain stub to the property to the north is not required.
Watermain stub to the north has been removed.
5. Label the existing gate valve location on the existing watermain stub. Verify it will be
contained within the drainage and utility easement.
Existing gate valve location has been labeled on the utility plan.
6. There is not an existing watermain stub as identified on the plans adjacent to the
proposed northerly driveway access.
Stub has been removed.
7. Show the irrigation connection to the watermain and irrigation layout on the plans.
Irrigation plans have now been included.
8. The proposed water service shall be installed with a minimum 7.5 feet of cover.
Note was added to Utility plan.
9. Sanitary sewer cleanouts are required at a maximum 70-foot interval, therefore an
additional cleanout should be added along the service line.
Cleanouts were added to the sanitary line.
10. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to
commencement of utility connections.
Permit will be obtained from public works prior to commencement of utility connections.
11. Provide an as-built utility plan once construction is complete.
As-built plans will be provided once construction is complete.
Stormwater Calculations
1. Provide proposed catch basin inlet capacity calculations. Catch basins should be
designed with sufficient capacity to limit ponding to maximum depth of 0.3 feet for a 10-
year rainfall event.
Ponding depth calculations have been added to the stormwater management report.
2. Provide a drainage area map.
A drainage area map has been added to the stormwater management report.
Preliminary Plat
1. Provide an 80-foot wide roadway, drainage and utility easement for Dundas Road within
Outlot A.
This has been added to the preliminary plat.
2. Provide required perimeter drainage and utility easements for Lot 1, Block 1.
These have been provided.
3. It should be noted that a future sidewalk extension along the east side of Cedar Street is
planned with the development of Outlot A. The applicant can opt to provide additional
right of way to accommodate this future sidewalk now or provide it in the future as right
of way or easement with the development of Outlot A.
This has been addressed.
If you have any further comments or questions, please do not hesitate to let us know.
Thank you,
MFRA, Inc
Eric Vogel, EIT
1
(reservedforrecordinginformation)
DEVELOPMENTCONTRACT
ANDCONDITIONALUSEPERMIT
(DeveloperInstalledImprovements)
CEDAR STREET ADDITION
AGREEMENT dated____________________,2014,byandbetweenthe CITYOFMONTICELLO,a
Minnesotamunicipalcorporation(“City”),and KTJ235,LLC,aMinnesotalimitedliabilitycompany(the
“Developer”).
1.REQUESTFORPLATAPPROVAL.TheDeveloperhasaskedtheCitytoapproveaplatfor
CEDAR STREET ADDITION (referredtointhisContractasthe"plat"andthe“Development”)consistingof38.28acres
toequalone(1)2.64acrecommerciallottobedevelopedbytheDeveloperandone(1)outlotforfuturedevelopment
bytheFeeOwnersdescribedonpage18ofthiscontract,ortheirsuccessorsand/orassigns.Thelandissituatedinthe
CountyofWright,StateofMinnesota,andislegallydescribedontheattachedExhibit“A”.
2.CONDITIONSOFPLATAPPROVAL.TheCityherebyapprovestheplatonconditionthatthe
DeveloperenterintothisContract,furnishthesecurityrequiredbyit,andrecordtheplatwiththeCountyRecorderor
RegistrarofTitleswithin365daysaftertheCityCouncilapprovesthefinalplatortheexecutionofthisContract,
whicheveroccurslater.
2
3.CONDITIONSOFCONDITIONALUSEPERMITAPPROVAL.TheCity‘sapprovalofthe
Developerconditionalusepermit(“CUP”)forcrossaccessisbasedontheconditionsthat:
1.EncroachmentagreementsmustbeapprovedbytheCityandfiledwithCountyforallareaswheredrive
aislesencroachondrainageandutilityeasementssimultaneouswiththerecordingofthefinalplat.
2.Additionallandscapingmustbeprovidedatthesoutheastcornerofthepropertytoensuresufficient
screeningoftheloadingarea.
3.Alllandscapedareasmustbeirrigated.
4.Theapplicantmustobtainwrittenapprovalfromeasementholdersforallproposedtreeandshrubplantings
ineasementareaspriortocityexecutionofthefinalplat.
5.Theproposedutility,grading,drainage,anderosioncontrolplansaresubjecttoreviewandcommentbythe
CityEngineer.TheapplicantshallcomplywithallrecommendationsoftheCityEngineerasprovidedin
thecommentletterdatedMay1st,2014.
6.Developershallenterintoasharedaccessandmaintenanceagreementwiththeadjoiningpropertyownerto
thenorthtoberecordedagainstbothparcelsifatsuchtimetheparceltothenorthisdevelopedand
requirestwoaccesspointsfromCedarStreet,unlessalternativeaccessplansareotherwiseapprovedbythe
City.
4.RIGHTTOPROCEED.Withintheplatorlandtobeplatted,theDevelopermaynotgradeor
otherwisedisturbtheearth,removetrees,constructsewerlines,waterlines,streets,utilities,publicorprivate
improvements,oranybuildingsuntilallthefollowingconditionshavebeensatisfied:1)thisContracthasbeenfully
executedbybothpartiesandfiledwiththeCityClerk,2)thenecessarysecurityhasbeenreceivedbytheCity,3)the
plathasbeensubmittedtotheWrightCountyRecorder'sOffice,and4)theCityhasissuedaletterthatallconditions
havebeensatisfiedandthattheDevelopermayproceed.
5.PHASEDDEVELOPMENT.Theplatwillcreateonelotforinitialdevelopmentandanoutlotfor
futurepossibledevelopment.TheOutlotresultingfromthisplatiscurrentlydesignatedas"GreenAcres"property
underMNStat.Sec.273.111 bytheWrightCountyAssessorsOffice.NoactionbytheCityofMonticelloorthe
Developerinplattingthedescribedpropertyisintendedtoimpactthe"GreenAcres"designation.
.6.PRELIMINARYPLATSTATUS.Thisplatisnotpartofaphaseddevelopment.
7.CHANGESINOFFICIALCONTROLS.Fortwo(2)yearsfromthedateofthisContract,no
amendmentstotheCity'sComprehensivePlan,orofficialcontrolsshallapplytooraffecttheuse,development
density,lotsize,lotlayoutordedicationsoftheapprovedplatunlessrequiredbystateorfederallaworagreedtoin
3
writingbytheCityandtheDeveloper.Thereafter,notwithstandinganythinginthisContracttothecontrary,tothefull
extentpermittedbystatelaw,theCitymayrequirecompliancewithanyamendmentstotheCity'sComprehensive
Plan.
8.ZONING.Exceptasotherwiseprovidedherein,thesubjectproperty,theone(1)2.64acre
commerciallottobedevelopedbytheDeveloper,shallbesubjecttothezoningregulationsfortheB-3(Highway
Business)CommercialZoningDistrict,ineffectatthetimethefinalplatisapproved.
9.CONDITIONFORSUBSEQUENTAPPROVALS.Nofinalplatorchangesoramendmentstothis
Agreementshallbeapproved,norshallconstructioncommenceforsuchadditionallanduses,untilanamendmentof
theAgreementisprocessedandapproved,subjecttotherequirementsoftheMonticelloZoningandSubdivision
Ordinances,includingthesubmissionofsiteplans,finalgradinganddrainageplans,finalutilityplans,andfinal
landscapingplans.FuturedevelopmentapplicationsandapprovalsfortheOutlotdonotrequiretheconsentorco-
applicationbytheOwnerofLot1,Block1.
10.DEVELOPMENTPLANS.Theplatshallbedevelopedinaccordancewiththefollowingplans.
TheplansshallbeattachedtothisContract.WiththeexceptionofPlansAandB,theplansmaybeprepared,subject
toCityapproval,afterenteringtheContract,butbeforecommencementofanyworkintheplat.Iftheplansvaryfrom
thewrittentermsofthisContract,thewrittentermsshallcontrol.Theplansare:
PlanA–Plat,dated5/20/14
PlanB-FinalGrading,StormWaterPollutionPreventionandErosionControlPlans,dated
5/16/14
PlanC-PlansandSpecificationsforPublicImprovements,dated5/16/14
PlanD–UtilityPlan,dated5/16/14
PlanE–SitePlan,dated5/16/14
PlanF–LightingPlan,dated5/16/14
PlanG-LandscapePlan,dated(tobeinserted)
PlanH-FloorPlan,dated5/16/14
PlanI-BuildingPlans,façadeelevations,dated5/16/14
4
PlanJ-ParkingandSidewalkDetailPlan,dated5/16/14
11.IMPROVEMENTS.TheDevelopershallinstallandpayforthefollowing:
A.PrivateSanitarySewerSystem
B.PrivateWaterSystem
C.PrivateStormSewerSystem
D.PublicSidewalk,CedarStreet
E.SiteGrading,Ponding,andErosionControl
F.UndergroundUtilities
G.SettingofIronMonuments
H.SurveyingandStaking
TheimprovementsshallbeinstalledinaccordancewiththeCitysubdivisionordinance;Citystandardspecifications
forutilitiesandstreetconstruction;andanyotherordinances.TheDevelopershallsubmitplansandspecifications
whichhavebeenpreparedbyaregisteredprofessionalengineertotheCityforapprovalbytheCityEngineer.The
Citymay,attheCity'sdiscretionandattheDeveloper'sexpense,haveoneormoreCityinspectorsandasoilengineer
inspecttheworkonafullorpart-timebasis.TheDeveloper,itscontractorsandsubcontractors,shallfollowallwritten
instructionsreceivedfromtheCity'sinspectorssubjecttoDeveloper’splansandspecifications.TheDeveloperorhis
engineershallscheduleapre-constructionmeetingatamutuallyagreeabletimeattheCityCouncilchamberswithall
partiesconcerned,includingtheCitystaff,toreviewtheprogramfortheconstructionwork.Withinthirty(30)days
afterthecompletionoftheimprovementsandbeforethesecurityisreleased,theDevelopershallsupplytheCitywith
acompletesetofreproducible"asconstructed"plans,anelectronicfileofthe"asconstructed"plansinanauto
CAD.DWGfileora.DXFfile,andtwocompletesetsofblueline"asconstructed"plans,allpreparedinaccordance
withCitystandards.
InaccordancewithMinnesotaStatutes505.02,thefinalplacementofironmonumentsforalllotcornersmust
becompletedbeforetheapplicablesecurityisreleased.TheDeveloper'ssurveyorshallalsosubmitawrittennoticeto
theCitycertifyingthatthemonumentshavebeeninstalled.
5
12.DESIGNSTANDARDS.TheapplicableZoningDistrictRegulationsareequaltothosesetforthin
theB-3(HighwayBusiness)CommercialDistrictRegulationandPlansE-Jasnotedherein.
13.PERMITS.TheDevelopershallobtainorrequireitscontractorsandsubcontractorstoobtainall
necessarypermits,includingbutnotlimitedto:
MnDotforStateHighwayAccess
MinnesotaDepartmentofHealthforWatermains
NPDESPermitforStormwaterConnections
CityofMonticelloforBuildingPermits
CityofMonticelloforGradingPermits
14.DEWATERING.Duetothevariablenatureofgroundwaterlevelsandstormwaterflows,itwill
betheDeveloper’sandtheDeveloper’scontractorsandsubcontractorsresponsibilitytosatisfythemselveswith
regardtotheelevationofgroundwaterintheareaandthelevelofeffortneededtoperformdewateringandstorm
flowroutingoperations.Alldewateringshallbeinaccordancewithallapplicablecounty,state,andfederalrules
andregulations.DNRregulationsregardingappropriationspermitsshallalsobestrictlyfollowed.
15.TIMEOFPERFORMANCE.TheDevelopershallinstallallrequiredpublicimprovementsby
August30th,oftheyearfollowingtheyearofrecordingofthefinalplat.
16.LICENSE.TheDeveloperherebygrantstheCity,itsagents,employees,officersandcontractorsa
licensetoentertheplattedpropertytoperformallworkandinspectionsdeemedappropriatebytheCityinconjunction
withplatdevelopment.
17.EROSIONCONTROLANDSTORMWATERCONTROL.Priortoinitiatingsitegrading,the
erosioncontrolplanandSWPPP,PlanB,shallbeimplementedbytheDeveloperandinspectedandapprovedbythe
CityorWrightCountySoilandWaterConservationDistrict.TheCitymayimposeadditionalerosioncontroland
stormwaterrequirementsiftheywouldbebeneficial.Allareasdisturbedbytheexcavationandbackfillingoperations
shallbereseededwithin48hoursafterthecompletionoftheworkorinanareathatisinactiveformorethanseven(7)
daysunlessauthorizedandapprovedbytheCityEngineer.Exceptasotherwiseprovidedintheerosioncontrolplan,
seedshallbeinaccordancewiththeCity'scurrentseedingspecificationwhichmayincludecertifiedoatseedto
provideatemporarygroundcoverasrapidlyaspossible.Allseededareasshallbefertilized,mulched,anddisc
anchoredasnecessaryforseedretention.Thepartiesrecognizethattimeisoftheessenceincontrollingerosion.Ifthe
6
Developerdoesnotcomplywiththeerosioncontrolplanandscheduleorsupplementaryinstructionsreceivedfrom
theCity,theCitymaytakesuchactionasitdeemsappropriatetocontrolerosion.TheCitywillendeavortonotifythe
Developerinadvanceofanyproposedaction,butfailureoftheCitytodosowillnotaffecttheDeveloper'sandCity's
rightsorobligationshereunder.IftheDeveloperdoesnotreimbursetheCityforanycosttheCityincurredforsuch
workwithinten(10)days,theCitymaydrawdowntheletterofcredittopayanycosts.Nodevelopment,utilityor
streetconstructionwillbeallowedandnobuildingpermitswillbeissuedunlesstheplatisinfullcompliancewiththe
approvederosioncontrolplanandstormwatercontrolmeasuresareinplace.
18.GRADINGPLANANDCERTIFICATION.Theplatshallbegradedinaccordancewiththe
approvedgradingplan,SWPPP,anderosioncontrolplanassetforthinPlan"B".TheplanshallconformtoCityof
Monticellospecifications.Withinthirty(30)daysaftercompletionofthegradingandbeforetheCityapproves
individualbuildingpermits(exceptaspermittedbythisagreementortheBuildingOfficial),theDevelopershall
providetheCitywithan"asconstructed"gradingplancertifiedbyaregisteredlandsurveyororengineerthatall
ponds,swales,andditcheshavebeenconstructedonpubliceasementsorlandownedbytheCity.Additionally,the"as
constructed"gradingplanwillincludeacertificationthatthegradingfollowingconstructionactivitieshasbeen
undisturbedorhasbeenreturnedtothestaterequiredinthegradingplan.The"asconstructed"planshallincludefield
verifiedelevationsofthefollowing:a)lotcornerelevations,andbuildingpads.TheCitywillwithholdissuanceof
buildingpermitsuntiltheapprovedcertifiedgradingplanisonfilewiththeCityandallerosioncontrolmeasuresare
inplaceasdeterminedbytheCityEngineer.TheDevelopercertifiestotheCitythatalllotswithbuildingfootings
placedonfillhavebeenmonitoredandconstructedtomeetorexceedapplicablespecifications.
19.CLEANUP.TheDevelopershallcleandirtanddebrisfromstreetsthathasresultedfrom
constructionworkbytheDeveloper,homebuilders,subcontractors,theiragentsorassigns.Priortoanyconstruction
intheplat,theDevelopershallidentifyinwritingaresponsiblepartyandscheduleforerosioncontrol,streetcleaning,
andstreetsweeping.TheDevelopershallpayapenaltyof$100.00adayforeachcalendardaythatthestreetsarenot
cleanedinaccordancewiththisparagraph.IftheDeveloperrepeatedlyfailstocleanstreetsinaccordancewiththis
paragraph,theCitymay,initsdiscretion,performtheworkorcontracttohavetheworkcompletedandbillthecoststo
theDeveloper.TheCitywillendeavortonotifytheDeveloperinadvanceofanyproposedaction,butfailureofthe
7
CitytodosowillnotaffecttheDeveloper'sandCity'srightsorobligationshereunder.IftheDeveloperdoesnot
reimbursetheCityforanycosttheCityincurredforsuchworkwithinten(10)daysfromthedatenoticeoftheamount
owedtotheCityismailed,theCitymaydrawdowntheIrrevocableLetterofCredittopayanycosts.Nodevelopment,
utilityorstreetconstructionwillbeallowedandnobuildingpermitswillbeissuedunlessthePlatisinfullcompliance
withtherequirementsofthisParagraph.
20.PUBLICIMPROVEMENTS.TheCedarStreetpublicsidewalkshallbedevelopedinaccordance
withtheapprovedplansandspecificationsfortheDevelopment,requiredCityspecifications,andPlan“E”andPlan
“J”,asidentifiedinParagraph9ofthisagreement.AsrequiredperCityCodeTitle8,Chapter1andTitle8,Chapter
5,theadjacentpropertyowner,areresponsibleformaintenanceofallsidewalkandboulevardareas.
21.OWNERSHIPOFIMPROVEMENTS.Uponcompletionoftheworkandconstructionrequired
bythisContract,theimprovementslyingwithinpubliceasementsshallbecomeCitypropertywithoutfurthernoticeor
action.
22.CITYENGINEERINGADMINISTRATIONANDCONSTRUCTIONOBSERVATION.
TheDevelopershallpayafeefortheCity’sengineeringadministration.Cityengineeringadministrationwillinclude
monitoringofconstructionobservation,consultationwithDeveloperandhisengineeronstatusorproblemsregarding
theproject,coordinationforfinalinspectionandacceptance,projectmonitoringduringthewarrantyperiod,and
processingofrequestsforreductioninsecurity.Feesforthisservicewillbebilledathourlyratesestimatedtobetwo
percent(2.0%)oftheestimatedconstructioncostofthepublicimprovements(publicsidewalk),or$2,000,whichever
isgreater,assumingnormalconstructionandprojectscheduling.TheDevelopershallpayforconstruction
observationperformedbytheCity'sconsultingengineer.Constructionobservationshallincludepartorfulltime
inspectionofproposedpublicutilitiesandstreetconstructionandwillbebilledonhourlyrates.
23.CLAIMS.IntheeventthattheCityreceivesclaimsfromlabor,materialmen,orothersthatwork
requiredbythisContracthasbeenperformed,thesumsduethemhavenotbeenpaid,andthelaborers,materialmen,
orothersareseekingpaymentfromtheCity,theDeveloperherebyauthorizestheCitytocommenceanInterpleader
actionpursuanttoRule22,MinnesotaRulesofCivilProcedurefortheDistrictCourts,todrawuponthelettersof
creditinanamountupto125percentoftheclaim(s)anddepositthefundsincompliancewiththeRule,andupon
8
suchdeposit,theDevelopershallrelease,discharge,anddismisstheCityfromanyfurtherproceedingsasitpertainsto
thelettersofcreditdepositedwiththeDistrictCourt,exceptthattheCourtshallretainjurisdictiontodetermine
attorneys'feespursuanttothisContract.
24.STORMSEWERAREACHARGE.TheDevelopmentissubjecttoastormsewerareachargeof
$27,039.00.Theareachargeisbasedonthegrossareaofthefinalplatlessanyareacreditforpondarea,andis
calculatedasfollows:
2.64netacres–x$10,242.00($3,245basestormwaterareacharge+$6,997alternatepondingarea
commercialrate)=$27,039.00
ThetotalstormsewerareachargefortheDevelopmentof$27,039.00 shallbepaidbytheDeveloperincashatthe
timeoffinalplatapproval.
25.SANITARYSEWERAREACHARGE.TheDevelopmentissubjecttoasanitarysewerarea
chargeof $8,902.00.Theareachargeisbasedonthegrossareaofthefinalplatandiscalculatedasfollows:
2.64acresx$3,065.00/acre=$8,902.00
TheDevelopershallpaythesanitarysewerareachargeincashatthetimeoffinalplat.
26.WATERMAINAREACHARGE.TheDevelopmentissubjecttoawatermainareachargeof
$5,985.00.Theareachargeisbasedonthegrossareaofthefinalplatandiscalculatedasfollows:
2.64acresx$2,267.00/acre=$5,985.00
TheDevelopershallpaythesanitarysewerareachargeincashatthetimeoffinalplat.
27.PARKDEDICATION.Notapplicable.
28.SPECIALPROVISIONS.Thefollowingspecialprovisionsshallapplytoplatdevelopment:
A.PriortoCityCouncilapprovalofthefinalplat,theDevelopershallfurnishaboundary
surveyoftheproposedpropertytobeplattedwithallpropertycornermonumentationinplaceandmarkedwithlath
andaflag.Anyencroachmentsonoradjacenttothepropertyshallbenotedonthesurvey.TheDevelopershallpost
a$1,800.00securityforthefinalplacementofinteriorsubdivisionironmonumentsatpropertycorners.Thesecurity
wascalculatedasfollows:6unitsat$300.00perunit.ThesecuritywillbeheldbytheCityuntiltheDeveloper'sland
surveyorcertifiesthatallironshavebeensetfollowingsitegradingandutilityandstreetconstruction.Inaddition,the
9
certificateofsurveymustalsoincludeacertificationthatallironsforaspecificlothaveeitherbeenfoundorsetprior
totheissuanceofabuildingpermitforthatlot.
B.TheDeveloperisrequiredtosubmitthefinalplatinelectronicformat.Theelectronicformat
shallbeeitherAutoCAD.DWGfileora.DXFfile.Allconstructionrecorddrawings(e.g.,grading,utilities,and
streets)shallbeinelectronicformatinaccordancewithstandardCityspecifications.TheDevelopershallalsosubmit
onecompletesetofreproducibleconstructionplansonMylar.
C.TheapplicantshallcomplywithallrecommendationsoftheCityEngineerasprovidedin
thecommentletterdatedMay1st,2014.
D.Priortoexecutionofthefinalplat,theDevelopershallobtainaneasementforroadway,
drainageandutilitypurposesthroughOutlotAforDundasRoadtobegrantedtotheCity.
29.TRAFFICSIGNALS.Developershallberesponsibleforaportionofthecostoffuturetraffic
signalsforintersectionofCedarStreetandSchoolBoulevardinanamounttobedeterminedbytheCitythroughthe
statutoryassessmentprocessasdefinedbyMNStatute429.
30.DEFERREDASSESSMENTS.ThepropertytobeplattedasLot1,Block1,CedarStreet
AdditionissubjecttoadeferredspecialassessmentagreementforstreetlightingimprovementsonCedarStreet
betweentheCityandthefeeownersdatedJune17,2003(“AssessmentAgreement”).TheleviedamountsonLot1,
Block1totals $21,971.97,whichshallbepaidat orbeforerecordingoftheplatoftheCedarStreetAddition,orby
November30,2014,whicheveroccursfirst,pursuanttoaseparatecontractbetweentheDeveloperandthefeeowner
oftheareaplattedasLot1,Block1.IfthedeferredassessmentisnotpaidbyNovember30,2014,theassessment
shallpaidpursuanttothetermsoftheAssessmentAgreementandwillbeplacedonthispropertyintheassessment
rollforthe2015payabletaxyear,subjecttotermsofthedeferredassessmentagreement,includinganinterestrateof
5.25%foratermupto15years.
OutlotAoftheCedarStreetAdditionisalsosubjecttoexistingdeferredspecialassessmentsforDundasRoad
(2006-02CCedarStreet/DundasRoadImprovements)andEdmonsonAvenue(12C001-RuralRoad
Improvements).ThoseassessmentsarenotapplicabletoLot1,Block1,CedarStreetAdditionandaresubjecttothe
10
termsandconditionsoftheagreementsrelatingtothoseassessmentsastheypertaintothefuturedevelopmentof
OutlotA.
31.SUMMARYOFSECURITYREQUIREMENTS.Toguaranteecompliancewiththetermsof
thisagreement,paymentofrealestatetaxesincludinginterestandpenalties,paymentofspecialassessments,payment
ofthecostsofallpublicimprovements,andconstructionofallpublicimprovements,theDevelopershallfurnishthe
Citywithcashoraletterofcredit,intheformattachedhereto,fromabank("security")for$47,650.00,plusacashfee
of$2,000.00forCityengineering,expensesandadministration.Theamountofthesecuritywascalculatedasfollows:
CONSTRUCTIONCOSTS:
ErosionControl/GradingCertification$7,920.00
Landscaping$20,000.00
PublicSidewalk$8,400.00
CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL (ESTIMATED)$36,320.00
OTHERCOSTS:
LotCorners/IronMonuments$1,800.00
TOTALCOSTS$38,120.00
TOTALSECURITIES:TotalCostsX125%$47,650.00
Thisbreakdownisforhistoricalreference;itisnotarestrictionontheuseofthesecurity.Thebankshallbesubjectto
theapprovaloftheCityAdministrator.Thesecurityshallbeforatermendingwhenmaintenancebondisposted.
Individualsecurityinstrumentsmaybeforshortertermsprovidedtheyareautomaticallyrenewedonanannualbasis
untilexpiration.TheCitymaydrawdownthesecuritywiththirty(30)dayswrittennoticetoDeveloper,forany
violationofthetermsofthisContractorifthesecurityisallowedtolapsepriortotheendoftherequiredterm.Ifthe
requiredpublicimprovementsarenotcompletedatleastthirty(30)dayspriortotherenewalofthesecurity,theCity
mayalsodrawitdown.Ifthesecurityisdrawndown,theproceedsshallbeusedtocurethedefault.Uponreceiptof
proofsatisfactorytotheCitythatworkhasbeencompletedandfinancialobligationstotheCityhavebeensatisfied,
withCityapprovalthesecuritymaybereducedfromtimetotimebyninetypercent(90%)ofthefinancialobligations
thathavebeensatisfied.Tenpercent(10%)oftheamountscertifiedbytheDeveloper'sengineershallberetainedas
securityuntilallimprovementshavebeencompleted,allfinancialobligationstotheCitysatisfied,therequired"as
11
constructed"planshavebeenreceivedbytheCity,awarrantysecurityisprovided,andthepublicimprovementsare
acceptedbytheCityCouncil.TheCitystandardspecificationsforutilitiesandstreetconstructionoutlineprocedures
forsecurityreductions.
32.SUMMARYOFCASHREQUIREMENTS.Thefollowingisasummaryofthecash
requirementsunderthisContractwhichmustbefurnishedtotheCitypriortothetimeoffinalplatapproval:
LegalandPlanning$2000.00
EngineeringandInspection(2%ofprojectcosts)$2000.00
StormSewerTrunkAreaCharge$27,039.00
SanitarySewerTrunkAreaCharge$8,902.00
WatermainTrunkAreaCharge$5,985.00
TotalCashRequirements$45,926.00
33.WARRANTY.TheDeveloperwarrantsallpublicimprovementsrequiredtobeconstructedbyit
pursuanttothisContractagainstpoormaterialandfaultyworkmanship.Thewarrantyperiodforthepublicsidewalk
istwoyearsandshallcommencefollowingtheissuanceofthecertificateofoccupancybytheCity’sBuilding
Department.TheDeveloperoritsContractorsshallpostawarrantybondintheamountofonehundredpercent
(100%)offinalcertifiedconstructioncoststosecurethewarranties.MaintenanceBondsoftheprimecontractormay
beacceptedsubjecttoCityapproval.TheCityshallretaintenpercent(10%)ofthesecuritypostedbytheDeveloper
untilthewarrantybondsarefurnishedtheCityoruntilthewarrantyperiodbegins,whicheverfirstoccurs.The
retainagemaybeusedtopayforwarrantywork.
34.RESPONSIBILITYFORCOSTS.
A.Exceptasotherwisespecifiedherein,theDevelopershallpayallactualcostsincurredbyitor
theCityinconjunctionwiththedevelopmentoftheplat,includingbutnotlimitedtoSoilandWaterConservation
Districtcharges,legal,planning,engineeringandinspectionexpensesincurredinconnectionwithapprovaland
acceptanceoftheplat,thepreparationofthisContract,reviewofconstructionplansanddocuments,andallcostsand
expensesincurredbytheCityinmonitoringandinspectingdevelopmentoftheplat.TheDevelopershalldepositwith
theCitytheamountsetforthinSection28tobeusedforthepaymentofthesefeesandenforcementfees.Ifthe
amountinthedepositaccountdropsbelow15%oftheinitialamount,theDeveloperwillmakeadditionaldepositsin
12
amountssetbytheCity.Atthecompletionoftheprojectandfollowingpaymentofallexpensesrelatedtotheproject,
theCityshallreturntheremainingdepositfundstotheDeveloper.
B.TheDevelopershallholdtheCityanditsofficers,employees,andagentsharmlessfrom
claimsmadebyitandthirdpartiesfordamagessustainedorcostsincurredresultingfromplatapprovaland
development.TheDevelopershallindemnifytheCityanditsofficers,employees,andagentsforallcosts,damages,or
expenseswhichtheCitymaypayorincurinconsequenceofsuchclaims,includingreasonableattorneys'feesand
costs.
C.TheDevelopershallreimbursetheCityforcostsincurredintheenforcementofthis
Contract,includingengineeringandattorneys'fees.
D.TheDevelopershallpay,orcausetobepaidwhendue,andinanyeventbeforeanypenalty
isattached,allspecialassessmentsreferredtointhisContract.TheDeveloperherebywaivesallassessmentnoticeand
hearingrequirements.IftheDeveloperelectstohavethechargessetforthinthiscontractassessedtotheproperties
herein,theassessmentshallbepayableoveratenyearperiod,intenequalprincipalinstallments,plusinterestat___%
perannumontheremainingprincipalbalanceeachyear.Interestwillbegintoaccrueontheprincipalbalance
commencingonthedateoffinalplatapprovalbytheCityofMonticelloorthedateofthiscontract,whicheverislater.
E.TheDevelopershallpayinfullallbillssubmittedtoitbytheCityforobligationsincurred
underthisContractwithinthirty(30)daysafterreceipt.Ifthebillsarenotpaidontime,theCitymayhaltplat
developmentandconstructionuntilthebillsarepaidinfull.Billsnotpaidwithinthirty(30)daysshallaccrueinterest
attherateofeighteenpercent(18%)peryear.
F.Inadditiontothechargesandspecialassessmentsreferredtoherein,otherchargesand
specialassessmentsmaybeimposedsuchasbutnotlimitedtoseweravailabilitycharges("SAC"),Citywater
connectioncharges,Citysewerconnectioncharges,andbuildingpermitfees.
G.IftheDeveloperisdedicatingpropertytotheCitytosatisfyParkDedicationrequirements,
separatelegaldescriptionsshallbedevelopedforthesepropertiesandquitclaimdeedsshallbeexecutedforeachof
thetransactions.TheDeveloperagreestopayallrealestatetaxesdueorpayableonoutlotstransferredtotheCityfor
theperioduptothetimetheoutlotsbecometaxexempt.
13
35.DEVELOPER’SDEFAULT.IntheeventofdefaultbytheDeveloperastoanyoftheworktobe
performedbyithereunder,theCitymay,atitsoption,performtheworkandtheDevelopershallpromptlyreimburse
theCityforanyexpenseincurredbytheCity,providedtheDeveloper,exceptinanemergencyasdeterminedbythe
City,isfirstgivennoticeoftheworkindefault,notlessthanforty-eight(48)hoursinadvance.ThisContractisa
licensefortheCitytoact,anditshallnotbenecessaryfortheCitytoseekaCourtorderforpermissiontoenterthe
land.WhentheCitydoesanysuchwork,theCitymay,inadditiontoitsotherremedies,assessthecostinwholeorin
part.
36.MISCELLANEOUS.
A.TheDeveloperrepresentstotheCitythattheplatcomplieswithallcity,county,
metropolitan,state,andfederallawsandregulations,includingbutnotlimitedto:subdivisionordinances,zoning
ordinances,andenvironmentalregulations.Iftheplatceasestocomplywithcounty,metropolitan,stateandfederal
lawsandregulations,theCitymay,atitsoption,refusetoallowconstructionordevelopmentworkintheplatuntilthe
Developerdoescomply.UpontheCity'sdemand,theDevelopershallceaseworkuntilthereiscompliance.
B.ThirdpartiesshallhavenorecourseagainsttheCityunderthisContract.
C.BreachofthetermsofthisContractbytheDevelopershallbegroundsfordenialofbuilding
permits,includinglotssoldtothirdparties.
D.Ifanyportion,section,subsection,sentence,clause,paragraph,orphraseofthisContractis
foranyreasonheldinvalid,suchdecisionshallnotaffectthevalidityoftheremainingportionofthisContract.
E.Ifbuildingpermitsareissuedpriortotheacceptanceofpublicimprovements,theDeveloper
assumesallliabilityandcostsresultingindelaysincompletionofpublicimprovementsanddamagetopublic
improvementscausedbytheCity,Developer,itscontractors,subcontractors,materialmen,employees,agents,or
thirdparties.Nosewerandwaterconnectionpermitsmaybeissuedandnoonemayoccupyabuildingforwhicha
buildingpermitisissuedoneitheratemporaryorpermanentbasisuntilthestreetsneededforaccesshavebeenpaved
withabituminoussurfaceandtheutilitiesareacceptedbytheCityEngineer.
F.TheactionorinactionoftheCityshallnotconstituteawaiveroramendmenttothe
provisionsofthisContract.Tobebinding,amendmentsorwaiversshallbeinwriting,signedbythepartiesand
14
approvedbywrittenresolutionoftheCityCouncil.TheCity'sfailuretopromptlytakelegalactiontoenforcethis
Contractshallnotbeawaiverorrelease.
G.ThisContractshallrunwiththelandandmayberecordedagainstthetitletotheproperty.
TheDevelopercovenantswiththeCity,itssuccessorsandassigns,thattheDeveloperiswellseizedinfeetitleofthe
propertybeingfinalplattedand/orhasobtainedconsentstothisContract,intheformattachedhereto,fromallparties
whohaveaninterestintheproperty;thattherearenounrecordedinterestsinthepropertybeingfinalplatted;andthat
theDeveloperwillindemnifyandholdtheCityharmlessforanybreachoftheforegoingcovenants.Intheeventthis
contractisfiledofrecord,uponcomplianceofalltermshereinbyDeveloper,theCityshallfileaterminationof
record.
H.Developershalltakeoutandmaintainorcausetobetakenoutandmaintaineduntilsix(6)
monthsaftertheCityhasacceptedthepublicimprovements,publicliabilityandpropertydamageinsurancecovering
personalinjury,includingdeath,andclaimsforpropertydamagewhichmayariseoutofDeveloper'sworkorthework
ofitssubcontractorsorbyonedirectlyorindirectlyemployedbyanyofthem.Limitsforbodilyinjuryanddeathshall
benotlessthan$500,000foronepersonand$1,000,000foreachoccurrence;limitsforpropertydamageshallbenot
lessthan$200,000foreachoccurrence;oracombinationsinglelimitpolicyof$1,000,000ormore.TheCityshallbe
namedasanadditionalinsuredonthepolicy,andtheDevelopershallfilewiththeCityacertificateevidencing
coveragepriortotheCitysigningtheplat.ThecertificateshallprovidethattheCitymustbegiventen(10)days
advancewrittennoticeofthecancellationoftheinsurance.TheDevelopermustprovideaCertificateofInsurance
whichmeetsthefollowingrequirements:
1.TheDescriptionsectionoftheAccordformneedstoread“CityofMonticelloisnamedasAdditional
InsuredwithrespecttotheGeneralLiabilityandAutoLiabilitypoliciesonaPrimaryandNon-
ContributoryBasis.”Eachpolicyshallprovide30daysnoticeofcancellationtoCityofMonticello.
2.CertificateHoldermustbeCityofMonticello.
3.ProvidecopyofpolicyendorsementshowingCityofMonticellonamedasAdditionalInsuredona
PrimaryandNon-ContributoryBasis.
15
I.Eachcontractofamunicipalitymustrequiretheprimecontractortopayanysubcontractor
withintendaysoftheprimecontractor'sreceiptofpaymentfromthemunicipalityforundisputedservicesprovided
bythesubcontractor.Thecontractmustrequiretheprimecontractortopayinterestof1-1/2percentpermonthor
anypartofamonthtothesubcontractoronanyundisputedamountnotpaidontimetothesubcontractor.The
minimummonthlyinterestpenaltypaymentforanunpaidbalanceof$100ormoreis$10.Foranunpaidbalanceof
lessthan$100,theprimecontractorshallpaytheactualpenaltyduetothesubcontractor.Asubcontractorwho
prevailsinacivilactiontocollectinterestpenaltiesfromaprimecontractormustbeawardeditscostsand
disbursements,includingattorney'sfees,incurredinbringingtheaction.
J.Eachright,powerorremedyhereinconferredupontheCityiscumulativeandinadditionto
everyotherright,powerorremedy,expressorimplied,noworhereafterarising,availabletoCity,atlaworinequity,
orunderanyotheragreement,andeachandeveryright,powerandremedyhereinsetforthorotherwisesoexisting
maybeexercisedfromtimetotimeasoftenandinsuchorderasmaybedeemedexpedientbytheCityandshallnot
beawaiveroftherighttoexerciseatanytimethereafteranyotherright,powerorremedy.
K.TheDevelopermaynotassignthisContractwithoutthewrittenpermissionoftheCity
Council,unlesssuchassignmentistoaprincipalofDeveloperoranotherentityinwhichtheDeveloperisaprincipal.
TheDeveloper'sobligationhereundershallcontinueinfullforceandeffecteveniftheDevelopersellspartorpartsof
theplattedland,untilallconditionsofassignmentaremet.
L.Retainingwallsthatrequireabuildingpermitshallbeconstructedinaccordancewithplans
andspecificationspreparedbyastructuralorgeotechnicalengineerlicensedbytheStateofMinnesota.Following
construction,acertificationsignedbythedesignengineershallbefiledwiththeCityEngineerevidencingthatthe
retainingwallwasconstructedinaccordancewiththeapprovedplansandspecifications.Allretainingwalls,the
developmentplans,orspecialconditionsreferredtointhisContractrequiredtobeconstructedshallbeconstructed
beforeanyotherbuildingpermitisissuedforalotonwhicharetainingwallisrequiredtobebuilt.
37.NOTICES.RequirednoticestotheDevelopershallbeinwriting,andshallbeeitherhanddelivered
totheDeveloper,itsemployeesoragents,ormailedtotheDeveloperbycertifiedmailatthefollowingaddress:5125
CountyRoad101,Suite100,Minnetonka,Minnesota55345.
16
NoticestotheCityshallbeinwritingandshallbeeitherhanddeliveredtotheCityAdministrator,ormailed
totheCitybycertifiedmailincareoftheCityAdministratoratthefollowingaddress:MonticelloCityHall,505
WalnutStreet,Monticello,Minnesota55362,withacopytotheCityAttorneybyregularmailat:CampbellKnutson,
P.A.,317EagandaleOfficeCenter,1380CorporateCenterCurve,Eagan,Minnesota55121.
DEVELOPER:KTJ235,LLC
By______________________________________
______________________________
Its:ChiefManager
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOFHENNEPIN)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis________dayof______________,2014,by
___________________,theChiefManagerof KTJ235,LLC,aMinnesotalimitedliabilitycompany,onits
behalf.
______________________________________________
NotaryPublic
17
CITYOFMONTICELLO
By___________________________________________
___________________________,ItsMayor
(SEAL)
And__________________________________________
_________________________,ItsCityAdministrator
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOFWRIGHT)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis________dayof______________,2014,by
_______________________and___________________,respectivelytheMayorandCityAdministratorofthe
CityofMonticello,aMinnesotamunicipalcorporation,onbehalfofthecorporationandpursuanttotheauthority
grantedbyitsCityCouncil.
______________________________________________
NotaryPublic
DRAFTEDBY:
CAMPBELL,KNUTSON
ProfessionalAssociation
317EagandaleOfficeCenter
1380CorporateCenterCurve
Eagan,MN55121
Telephone:(651)452-5000
JJJ/jmo
18
FEEOWNERCONSENT
TODEVELOPMENTCONTRACT
THISCONSENTTODEVELOPMENTCONTRACT,madethis_______dayof
_____________,2014,isgrantedby JohnM.LundstenandMaryEllenLundsten,husbandandwife in
favorof KTJ235,LLC,aMinnesotaLimitedLiabilityCorporation.
ForOneDollarandothergoodandsufficientconsideration,inhandreceived,JohnM.Lundsten
andMaryEllenLundsten,husbandandwife herebyconsenttothedevelopmentoflandinWright
County,Minnesotaandagreetocooperatewith KTJ235,LLC inthesigningandfilingofanyandall
documentswhichmaybenecessaryforthefilingoftheDevelopmentContractwithrespecttothisproperty
andaffirmandconsenttotheprovisionsthereofandagreetobeboundbytheprovisionsasthesamemay
applytothatportionofthesubjectpropertyownedbythem,ifhowever,OwnershavenofeeinterestinLot
1,Block1CedarStreetAddition,OwnersshallnotbeliableforanyactsoromissionsofKTJ235,LLC.,
it'ssubcontractors,successorsand/orassignsincompliancewithanytermofsaidDevelopmentContract.
astoLot1,Block1,CedarStreetAddition.
Dated:_________________,2014.__________________________________
By:
Its:
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOF___________)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis_______dayof____________________,2014,by
________________________,the________________________of____________________________aMinnesotacorporation,
onbehalfofsaidcorporation.
_______________________________________
NOTARYPUBLIC
DRAFTEDBY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
ProfessionalAssociation
1380CorporateCenterCurve,Suite#317
Eagan,Minnesota55121
Telephone:(651)452-5000
19
EXHIBIT"A"
LegalDescriptionofPropertyBeingFinalPlattedAs
20
IRREVOCABLELETTEROFCREDIT
No.___________________
Date:_________________
TO:CityofMonticello
505WalnutStreet
Monticello,Minnesota55362
DearSirorMadam:
Weherebyissue,fortheaccountof(NameofDeveloper)andinyourfavor,ourIrrevocableLetterofCreditin
theamountof$____________,availabletoyoubyyourdraftdrawnonsightontheundersignedbank.
Thedraftmust:
a)Beartheclause,"DrawnunderLetterofCreditNo.__________,dated________________,2_____,of(Nameof
Bank)";
b)BesignedbytheMayororCityAdministratoroftheCityofMonticello.
c)Bepresentedforpaymentat(AddressofBank),onorbefore4:00p.m.onNovember30,2007.
ThisLetterofCreditshallautomaticallyrenewforsuccessiveone-yeartermsunless,atleastforty-five(45)dayspriorto
thenextannualrenewaldate(whichshallbeNovember30ofeachyear),theBankdeliverswrittennoticetotheMonticelloCity
Administratorthatitintendstomodifythetermsof,orcancel,thisLetterofCredit.Writtennoticeiseffectiveifsentbycertified
mail,postageprepaid,anddepositedintheU.S.Mail,atleastforty-five(45)dayspriortothenextannualrenewaldateaddressed
asfollows:MonticelloCityAdministrator,MonticelloCityHall,505WalnutStreet,Monticello,MN55362,andisactually
receivedbytheCityAdministratoratleastthirty(30)dayspriortotherenewaldate.
ThisLetterofCreditsetsforthinfullourunderstandingwhichshallnotinanywaybemodified,amended,amplified,or
limitedbyreferencetoanydocument,instrument,oragreement,whetherornotreferredtoherein.
ThisLetterofCreditisnotassignable.ThisisnotaNotationLetterofCredit.Morethanonedrawmaybemadeunder
thisLetterofCredit.
ThisLetterofCreditshallbegovernedbythemostrecentrevisionoftheUniformCustomsandPracticefor
DocumentaryCredits,InternationalChamberofCommercePublicationNo.500.
WeherebyagreethatadraftdrawnunderandincompliancewiththisLetterofCreditshallbedulyhonoredupon
presentation.
BY:____________________________________
Its______________________________
21
CERTIFICATEOFINSURANCE
PROJECT:
CERTIFICATEHOLDER:CityofMonticello
505WalnutStreet
Monticello,Minnesota55362
INSURED:
ADDITIONALINSURED:CityofMonticello
AGENT:
WORKERS'COMPENSATION:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
COVERAGE-Workers'Compensation,Statutory.
GENERALLIABILITY:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
()ClaimsMade ()Occurrence
LIMITS:[Minimum]
BodilyInjuryandDeath:
$500,000foroneperson$1,000,000foreachoccurrence
PropertyDamage:
$200,000foreachoccurrence
-OR-
CombinationSingleLimitPolicy$1,000,000ormore
COVERAGEPROVIDED:
OperationsofContractor:YES
OperationsofSub-Contractor(Contingent):YES
DoesPersonalInjuryIncludeClaimsRelatedtoEmployment?YES
22
CompletedOperations/Products:YES
ContractualLiability(BroadForm):YES
GovernmentalImmunityisWaived:YES
PropertyDamageLiabilityIncludes:
DamageDuetoBlastingYES
DamageDuetoCollapseYES
DamageDuetoUndergroundFacilitiesYES
BroadFormPropertyDamageYES
AUTOMOBILELIABILITY:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
(X)AnyAuto
LIMITS:[Minimum]
BodilyInjury:
$500,000eachperson$1,000,000eachoccurrence
PropertyDamage:
$500,000eachoccurrence
-OR-
CombinedSingleLimitPolicy:$1,000,000eachoccurrence
AREANYDEDUCTIBLESAPPLICABLETOBODILYINJURYORPROPERTYDAMAGEONANYOFTHE
ABOVECOVERAGES:
Ifso,list:Amount:$________________
[Nottoexceed$1,000.00]
SHOULDANYOFTHEABOVEDESCRIBEDPOLICIESBECANCELLEDBEFORETHEEXPIRATIONDATE
THEREOF,THEISSUINGCOMPANYWILLMAILTEN(10)DAYSWRITTENNOTICETOTHEPARTIESTO
WHOMTHISCERTIFICATEISISSUED.
Datedat_____________________________On__________________________________
BY:_________________________________
AuthorizedInsuranceRepresentative
1
176311v1
(reservedforrecordinginformation)
__________________________________________________________________________________
GRANTOFPERMANENTEASEMENT
JohnM.LundstenandMaryEllenLundsten,husbandandwife.hereinafterreferredtoas
"Grantors",inconsiderationofOneDollar($1.00)andothergoodandvaluableconsideration,the
receiptandsufficiencyofwhichisherebyacknowledged,doherebygrantuntothe CITYOF
MONTICELLO,amunicipalcorporationorganizedunderthelawsoftheStateofMinnesota,the
Grantee,hereinafterreferredtoasthe"City",itssuccessorsandassigns,forever,apermanent
easementforpublicroadway,drainageandutilitypurposesover,across,on,under,andthroughland
situatedwithintheCountyofWright,StateofMinnesota,asdescribedontheattachedExhibit"A"
anddepictedontheattachedsketch.
INCLUDINGtherightsoftheCity,itscontractors,agents,servants,andassigns,toenter
upontheeasementpremisesatallreasonabletimestoconstruct,reconstruct,inspect,repair,and
maintainsaidpublicroadway,drainageandutilitysystemsover,across,on,under,andthroughthe
easementpremises,togetherwiththerighttograde,level,fill,drain,andexcavatetheeasement
premises,andthefurtherrighttoremovetrees,bushes,undergrowth,andotherobstructions
interferingwiththelocation,construction,andmaintenanceofsaidpublicroadway,drainageand
utilitysystems.
2
176311v1
TheabovenamedGrantors,forthemselves,theirsuccessors,heirs,andassignsdocovenant
withtheCity,itssuccessorsandassigns,thattheyarewellseizedinfeetitleoftheabovedescribed
easementpremises;thattheyhavethesolerighttograntandconveytheeasementtotheCity;that
therearenounrecordedinterestsintheeasementpremises;andthattheywillindemnifyandhold
theCityharmlessforanybreachoftheforegoingcovenants.
INTESTIMONYWHEREOF,theGrantorsheretohavesignedthiseasementthis
_______dayof_______________,2014.
GRANTORS:
___________________________________
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTYOFWRIGHT)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis____dayof
_______________,2014,byJohnM.LundstenandMaryEllenLundsten,husbandandwife.
___________________________________
NotaryPublic
INSTRUMENTWASDRAFTEDBY:
CAMPBELLKNUTSON
ProfessionalAssociation
317EagandaleOfficeCenter
1380CorporateCenterCurve
Eagan,Minnesota55121
Telephone:612452-5000
AMP/cjh
3
176311v1
EXHIBIT"A"
TO
GRANTOFPERMANENTEASEMENT
TheNorth80.00feetoftheSouth712.00feetofOutlotA,CEDARSTREETADDITION,accordingtothe
recordedplatthereof,WrightCounty,Minnesota.
4
176311v1
MORTGAGEHOLDER
CONSENTTOEASEMENT
______________________________________________________________,whichholds
amortgageonallorpartofthepropertymoreparticularlydescribedintheforegoingGrantof
PermanentEasement,whichmortgageisdated_________________________,andrecorded
_________________________asDocumentNo._________________withtheofficeofthe
CountyRecorder/RegistrarofTitlesforWrightCounty,Minnesota,forgoodandvaluable
consideration,thereceiptandsufficiencyofwhichisherebyacknowledged,doesherebyjoinin,
consentstoandsubjectsitsinterestinthepropertysubjecttotheforegoingGrantofPermanent
Easement.
By:
Its:
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTYOF____________)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis______dayof____________,
2014,by_________________________________the______________________________of
______________________________________________________,_______________________,
onitsbehalf.
_____________________________________
NOTARYPUBLIC
THISINSTRUMENTWASDRAFTEDBY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
ProfessionalAssociation
317EagandaleOfficeCenter
1380CorporateCenterCurve
Eagan,MN55121
Telephone:651-452-5000
AMP/cjh
(Abstract/TorrensProperty)1
(reservedforrecordinginformation)
ENCROACHMENTAGREEMENT
AGREEMENT madethis_______dayof_____________,2014,byandbetweenthe CITY
OFMONTICELLO,aMinnesotamunicipalcorporation("City"),and KTJ235,LLC,aMinnesota
limitedliabilitycompany ("Owner").
1.BACKGROUND.OwneristhefeeownerofcertainpropertylocatedwithintheCityof
Monticello,CountyofWright,StateofMinnesotalegallydescribedasfollows:
Lot1,Block1,CedarStreetAddition,accordingtotherecordedplatthereof.
havingastreetaddressof_________________________________,Monticello,MN55362("subject
property").TheCityownseasementsfordrainageandutilitypurposesoverportionsofthesubject
propertyasshownontheattachedExhibit“A”.Ownerwouldliketoconstructapavedaccessdriveaisle
onthesubjectpropertywhichwillencroachintotheCity'seasementareasasdepictedontheattached
Exhibit“B”.
2.ENCROACHMENTAUTHORIZATION.TheCityherebyapprovestheencroachment
initseasementareasfortheconstruction,use,andmaintenanceoftheproposedpaveddriveaisleas
depictedontheattachedExhibit“B”.
(Abstract/TorrensProperty)2
3.MAINTENANCE.Ownershallberesponsibleforallcostsrelatingtoconstruction,
reconstruction,maintenance,andrepair,includingsnowremoval,withrespecttothepaveddriveaisle.
ThismaintenanceagreementisapersonalobligationofOwnerandshallbebindingupontheexecutors,
administrators,successors,heirsandassignsofOwner.
4.HOLDHARMLESSANDINDEMNITY.Inconsiderationofbeingallowedto
encroachintheCity'seasementareas,Owner,its/theirsuccessors,heirsandassigns,herebyagree(s)to
indemnifyandholdtheCityharmlessfromallcostsandexpenses,claimsandliability,including
reasonableattorney'sfees,relatingtoorarisingoutofthisgranttoOwnerofpermissiontoencroachinthe
City'seasementareasfortheconstruction,reconstruction,maintenance,use,operation,andthelikeofthe
paveddriveaisle.
5.TERMINATION.IftheCityreasonablydeterminesthatthedriveaisleunreasonably
interfereswiththeuse,maintenanceorrepairoftheCity’sutilitieswithintheeasementareas,Ownerupon
requestbytheCityshallremoveandreplacetheinterferenceatits/theirsoleexpense.IfOwnerfailsto
removetheinterferenceinthetimeframerequiredbytheCity,theCitymayremovetheinterferenceand
shallhavenoobligationfordamagesto,orrepairorreplacementoftheinterferenceremovedbytheCity.
Further,theOwnerconsentstotheCitylevyinganassessmentagainstthesubjectpropertyfortheCity’s
costs.
IfOwnerfailstomaintainthedriveaisleorfailstoremoveandreplaceanyinterferenceas
providedinthisparagraph,theCitymay,atitssolediscretion,terminatethisAgreementbygivingthe
currentownerofthesubjectpropertythirty(30)daysadvancewrittennoticeexceptthatnonoticeperiod
willberequiredinthecaseofanemergencyconditionasdeterminedsolelybytheCityandthe
Agreementmaythenbeterminatedimmediately.
(Abstract/TorrensProperty)3
TheCitymayunilaterallyterminatethisAgreementifthedriveaisleinterfereswithany
maintenanceorimprovementswithintheCity’seasementareasasdeterminedbytheCity.
6.RECORDING.ThisAgreementshallberecordedagainstthetitletothesubjectproperty
andshallbebindinguponOwner,its/theirassigns,heirsandsuccessorsininterest.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
BY:_________________________________
(SEAL)ClintHerbst,Mayor
AND________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOFWRIGHT)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis_______dayof______________,
2014,byClintHerbstandbyJeffO’Neill,respectivelytheMayorandCityAdministratoroftheCityof
Monticello,aMinnesotamunicipalcorporation,onbehalfofthecorporationandpursuanttotheauthority
grantedbyitsCityCouncil.
____________________________________
NOTARYPUBLIC
(Abstract/TorrensProperty)4
KTJ235,LLC
aMinnesotalimitedliabilitycompany
_____________________________________
By:JosephH.Ryan
Its:President
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOFHENNEPIN)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis_______dayofMay,2014,by
JosephH.Ryan,thePresidentofKTJ235,LLC,aMinnesotalimitedliabilitycompany,onbehalfofthe
limitedliabilitycompany.
____________________________________
NOTARYPUBLIC
THISINSTRUMENTDRAFTEDBY:
CAMPBELLKNUTSON
ProfessionalAssociation
317EagandaleOfficeCenter
1380CorporateCenterCurve
Eagan,Minnesota55121
Telephone:(651)452-5000
SRN:ms
(Abstract/TorrensProperty)5
EXHIBIT“A”
SKETCHOF CITY DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTS
(Abstract/TorrensProperty)6
EXHIBIT“B”
SKETCH DEPICTING
PARKING LOTAND ACCESS DRIVE AISLE ENCROACHMENTS
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/2014
1
7B.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinanceNo.596amendingTitle10,MonticelloZoning
Ordinance,Chapter2.4(P)–SpecificReviewRequirements,PlannedUnit
DevelopmentsandSection2.3(I)relatingtowrittennotificationforPlannedUnit
Developmentapplications;andadoptingSummaryOrdinanceNo.596Afor
publication (NAC)
A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND:
PlanningCaseNumber:2014-023
Request(s):Amendmentstotheregulationsgoverningthereview
andapprovalofPlannedUnitDevelopment
applications.
DeadlineforDecision:NA
LandUseDesignation:NA
ZoningDesignation:NA
ANALYSIS
ThematerialattachedtothisreportproposeschangestotheCity’sPlannedUnit
Developmentregulationstohelpstreamlineandclarifytheapplicationandreview
processforsuchPUDprojectproposals.Thegeneralstructurewouldremainthe
same,butsomeadjustmentsareproposedbasedonrecentprojectexperienceanda
reviewofthecurrentordinancelanguage.Thechangesarealsoinconcertwiththe
CityAttorney’srecommendationsasrelatedtocompliancewithMNStatues15.99,
whichsetsthetimelinesforanagency’sreviewofapplications.
AppropriaterenumerationoftheordinancewillbeaddressedbytheDeputyCity
Clerkintheordinancedocument.
Theproposedchangesaresummarized(moreorlessinorderofamendment)as
follows:
Table2-2
ApplicationType:WrittenNoticeProvidedTo:
PlannedUnitDevelopmentAllpropertyownerswithin350feet
TheabovechangetoSection2.3–CommonReviewProcedures&Requirementsof
theZoningCodeisprovidedforconsistencywithstatutorynotificationrequirements
andasalsoconsistentwithallotherCitylanduseapplicationnotification
requirements.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/2014
2
Otherproposedamendmentstothetextof2.4(P)–PlannedUnitDevelopmentsare
listedbelow.
P(1)ThecollaborativeprocessisreplacedasmovedtotheConcept
ProposalReview–moreaboutthischangebelow.
P(3)NotationrelatedtoexistingPUDs
P(4)ClarifythatPUDmaybeusedinanyzoningdistrict.
P(7)Rewordthepublicvaluesdiscussionasamoregeneralizedexample,
andrestatethepurposeofPUDdesign.
P(7)(e)/(g)/(j)Clearerwording
P(7)(i)AddeditemtospecifythatPUDdevelopmentintensityisintendedto
reflectthecapacityofthelandandservices–possiblymore,possibly
less.
P8(a)Changestopermissive“may”consideration.
P8(d)Changestopermissive“may”consideration.
P(8)(b)DeletesthereferencetoroadwidthasaspecificPUDflexibilityoption
–theCityhasstandardroadwidthrequirementsbasedonpublic
safety.Roadwidthmaybecomeanelementqualifyingforflexibility,
buttheapplicantshouldproveitinthedesign.
P(8)(b)(New)AddssomeexamplesofflexibilitybyPUD,andmakesthe
considerationofflexibilitydiscretionary(“may”),ratherthan
mandatory(“shall”).
P(9)(a)EliminatesthissectiononCollaborativeprocess,movingtheprocess
andrequirementstotheConceptStage(andpartiallyintothe
DevelopmentStage).Therationalewiththechangeistoassistin
streamliningthePUDprocess,whileachievingthesamecollaborative
approachandtomaintaincompliancewithMS15.99rulesforformal
applicationreviewtimelines.
P(9)(b)PUDConceptProposal.Thistextincorporatesajointmeetingofthe
CityCouncilandPlanningCommissionfromtheCollaborativeStage
here.TheCityAttorneyhasalsorecommendedthatconceptproposals
beoptional,andthatthisprocessprovidepreliminaryfeedbackwithout
decision.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/2014
3
P(9)(b)(i)-(iii)Revisionstoreflectthechangefromanapplicationplansubmittaltoa
proposalreview.
P(9)(b)(iii)4.Addsarequirementthattheapplicantidentifydevelopment
objectives(formerlyapartofthecollaborativeprocess).
P(9)(b)(iii)9.Addsarequirementthattheapplicantidentifytheareasinwhich
he/sheproposestovaryfromthestandardzoningrequirementsasa
partoftheapplicationsubmission.
P(9)(b)(iv)RevisestheConceptPlanProposalprocesstoincorporatethejoint
publicmeetingofthePlanningCommissionandCityCounciland
providesthatcommentsofthesebodiesareexplicitlynotadecision.
Anoticeofthemeetingisstillprovidedtothepublic,andthemeeting
ispublic,butisnotapublichearing.
P(9)(c)RenamesthePreliminaryPlatstageasPUDDevelopmentStage,
PreliminaryPlat,andRezoning.Thesearethreeapplicationsbeing
consideredafterConceptreviewhasoccurred,andestablishthe
workingdevelopmentrightsfortheproject.Staffhadconsidered
removingtheplatlanguagefromthecode,butinsteaditislefthere,
essentiallynotingthatPUDprojectsoccuronplattedland.The
DevelopmentStagePUDplans,thePreliminaryPlat,andtheRezoning
toPUDwouldoccurconcurrentlyatthisstage,withplattingas
applicable.
P(9)(c)(ii)Notesthatplattingmaybeapplicable.
P(9)(c)(iii)Changesreflectiveofnamingandapplicationtypesfordevelopment
stageapprovals.
P(9)(c)(iv)3.RemovesthePublicValuesStatement.Aproject’srelatednessto
PUDvalueswouldinsteadberequiredperordinanceandincorporated
aspartoftheanalysis.
P(9)(c)(iv)5.Rewordsthefindingscriteriaforinternalconsistency.
P(9)(c)(iv)6.Addsnotetothisprocesssectionthatdirectsthestafftopreparea
rezoningordinanceforreview,butspecifiesthatrezoningadoption
wouldbesubsequenttoFinalStagePUDapproval.
P(9)(d)FinalStagePUDandFinalPlat–requiresconformancewiththe
DevelopmentStagePUDandPreliminaryPlatapprovals,anddeletes
therepealerprovisiononthezoning(sincethezoningwillnothave
happenedunlessallotherapprovalsaregranted).NotesMS15.99
timelinefordecision.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/2014
4
P(9)(d)(iii)Variousclarificationsonconsistencyandrequirements.
P(9)(d)(iv)AddsclarificationthattheFinalStagePUDandFinalPlatwillbe
reviewedandapprovedbytheCityCouncil,ratherthantheimplied
staffreviewonly.ProvidesthattheCouncilmayrefertheFinalStage
backtothePlanningCommissionifappropriate.
P(10)(a)ProvidesforclarificationonformalizationofPUDAdministrative
Amendments.
P(10)(b)Specifiesthata“PUDAdjustment”shallbetreatedasachangetothe
FinalPUDandwillfollowthatprocess.
P(11)Cancellationwouldoccuruponspecificfindings,includingthose
identifiedinthisnewlanguage.
Asnotedabove,thesechangesareintendedtorefinethePUDzoningprocessandtie
upafewexistinglooseends,basedontheCity’sexperienceswiththenewordinance.
PlanningCommissionActionandRecommendation
ThePlanningCommissionreviewedthisitemduringitsregularmeetingonMay6th,
2014andheldapublichearingontheproposedamendments.Duringhispresentation
totheCommission,PlannerSteveGrittmannotedthatthelanguagewasstillsubject
tofinalrevisionsbasedontheattorney’srecommendationsforreviewanddecision
timelines.Thosechangeswouldrelatespecificallytotheconceptlevelsubmittals
andthereviewtimelinefordevelopmentandfinalstages.Thechangesnotedabove
andintheamendmentarereflectiveoftheCityAttorney’srecommendations.
Nopublicwaspresenttocommentontheordinanceitemduringthehearing.
ThePlanningCommissionrecommendedtheproposedamendmentsunanimously,4-
0.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS
ThePlanningCommissionrecommendsalternative1below.
1.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#596fortheamendmentstoSection2.3and2.4,
revisingtheprocessandrequirementsforPUDintheMonticelloZoning
Ordinance,basedonfindinginPlanningCommissionResolution#2014-049;
andtoadoptSummaryOrdinanceNo.596Aforpublication.
Itshouldbenotedthatadoptionofsummaryordinancesrequiresa4/5th
majorityvoteofapproval.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/2014
5
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofOrdinanceNo.596,basedonfindingstobemade
bytheCityCouncil.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
Staff,includingtheCityAttorney,recommendsAlternative#1foradoptionofthe
amendments.Theprocessascurrentlywrittendoesnotprovideforpublic,Council
andPlanningCommissioninputuntilthedeveloperhasexpendedconsiderablesums
ontheproject.Theproposedprocessprovidesanopportunityforthispublic
commentwhileallowingtheCitytomaintaincompliancewithstatutoryreviewand
decisiontimelines.
Finally,therearesomeinconsistenciesinthelanguageastohowthezoningand
plattingrequirementsinteract–theintentofthesechangesistorequireplattingwhere
needed,butspecifythattherearebothPUDzoningandsubdivisionprocesseswhich
maybeoccurringconcurrently.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.OrdinanceNo.596andSummaryOrdinanceNo.596A
B.DraftOrdinancelanguage(Exhibit“A”toOrdinance596)
C.ProposedOrdinancewithrevisions
D.PlanningCommissionResolution2014-049
E.MonticelloZoningOrdinance,Chapter2.3,excerpt
ORDINANCENO.596
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
ANORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE10OFTHEMONTICELLOZONINGCODE
FORSECTION2.4(P)-PLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENTS
THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFMONTICELLO,MINNESOTA,HEREBY
ORDAINS:
Section1.Title10oftheMonticelloZoningCodeoftheCityofMonticello,Section2.4–
SpecificReviewProceduresandRequirementsisherebyamendedforPlanned
UnitDevelopmentsasshowninExhibit“A.”
Section2.TheCityClerkisherebydirectedtomakethechangesrequiredbythisOrdinance
aspartoftheOfficialMonticelloCityCode,Title10,ZoningOrdinance,andto
renumberthetablesandchaptersaccordinglyasnecessarytoprovidetheintended
effectofthisOrdinance.TheCityClerkisfurtherdirectedtomakenecessary
correctionstoanyinternalcitationsanddiagramsthatresultfromsuch
amendments,providedthatsuchchangesretainthepurposeandintentofthe
ZoningOrdinanceashasbeenadopted.
Section3.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafteritspassageand
publication.RevisionswillbemadeonlineafteradoptionbyCouncil.Copiesof
thecompleteZoningOrdinanceareavailableonlineandatMonticelloCityHall.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis27thdayofMay,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
__________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
VOTINGINFAVOR:
VOTINGINOPPOSITION:
ORDINANCENO.596
EXHIBIT“A”
Attach:Title10MonticelloZoningCode,Section2.4(P)–PlannedUnitDevelopments
SUMMARYORDINANCENO.596A
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
ASUMMARYORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE10,SECTION2.4(P)OFTHE
MONTICELLOZONINGCODERELATINGTOPLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENTS
NOTICEISHEREBYGIVEN that,onMay27,2014,OrdinanceNo.596wasadopted
bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota.Duetothelengthynatureof
OrdinanceNo.596,thefollowingSummaryOrdinanceNo.596Ahasbeenpreparedfor
publicationasauthorizedbystatelaw.
TheordinanceadoptedbytheCouncilamendsTitle10,Section2.4(P)oftheMonticello
ZoningCode.ThegeneralpurposeoftheordinanceamendmentistoupdateSpecificReview
ProceduresandRequirementsrelatedtoPlannedUnitDevelopments(PUD)withchangesinthe
followingsections:
2.4(P)(1):PurposeandIntent
2.4(P)(3):ReflectionontheOfficialZoningMap
2.4(P)(4):PermittedLocationsforPUDRezoning
2.4(P)(7):ExpectationsofaDevelopmentSeekingaRezoningtoPUD
2.4(P)(8):AreasofFlexibility
2.4(P)(9):PUDProcedure
2.4(P)(10):PUDAmendments
2.4(P)(11):PUDCancellation
Aprintedcopyofthewholeordinanceisavailableforinspectionbyanypersonduring
theCity’sregularofficehours.ThecompleteordinancewillbepostedontheCity’swebsite
followingpublication.
APPROVEDFORPUBLICATION bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,
Minnesota,this27th dayofMay,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
JeffO’NeillCityAdministrator
VOTINGINFAVOR:
VOTINGINOPPOSITION:
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page1
(P)PlannedUnitDevelopments
(1)PurposeandIntent
ThepurposeofthePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)zoningdistrictistoprovide
greaterflexibilityinthedevelopmentofneighborhoodsandnon-residentialareas
inordertomaximizepublicvaluesandachievemorecreativedevelopment
outcomeswhileremainingeconomicallyviableandmarketable.Thisisachieved
byundertakinga collaborative processthatresultsinadevelopmentoutcome
exceedingthatwhichistypicallyachievablethroughtheconventionalzoning
district.TheCityreservestherighttodenythePUDrezoninganddirectthe
developertore-applyunderthestandardapplicablezoningdistrict.
(2)InitiationofProceedings
ApplicationsforaPUDshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthepropertyowneror
otherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B),
AuthoritytoFileApplications.
(3)ReflectionontheOfficialZoningMap
(a)PUDprovisionsprovideanoptionalmethodofregulatinglandusewhich
permitsflexibilityinallowedusesandotherregulatingprovisions.Insome
circumstances,however,rulesandregulationsgoverningtheoriginalzoning
district,orotherzoningregulationsfoundelsewhereintheCity’sordinances,
maybeappropriatetoapplywithinthePUD.Assuch,approvalofaPlanned
UnitDevelopmentandexecutionofaPUDagreementshallrequirethe
propertyinquestionberezonedtoPUD.ForeachPUDDistrict,aspecific
ordinanceshallbeadopted,alongwithatrackingdesignationforuseonthe
officialzoningmaptodistinguishitfromotherPUDdistrictsandidentifythe
adoptedordinanceintheCityCode.OnceaPUDhasbeengrantedandisin
effectforaparcel,nobuildingpermitshallbeissuedforthatparcelwhichis
notinconformancewiththeapprovedPUDPlan,thecurrentMinnesotaState
BuildingCodeandallassociateddocuments,andwithallotherapplicable
CityCodeprovisions.
(b)AllPUDrezoningsapprovedpriortotheeffectivedateofthisordinanceshall
retaintheirzoningclassificationsofR-PUD,andshallcontinuetobe
governedbytheordinanceandresolutionswhichcreatedtheseareas.
(b)(c)AllPUDspreviouslygrantedbyConditionalUsePermitshall
continuetoberegulatedunderthetermsoftheCUP.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
PUDFinalStage,
FinalPlat&
RezoningREVIEW
(Staff,applicable
Commissions&
Council)
PUD Final Stage
and Final Plat
APPLICATION
PUD Development
Stage,Preliminary
Plat &Rezoning
REVIEW
(Staff,applicable
Commissions &
Council)
PUD Development
Stage,Preliminary
Plat and Rezoning
APPLICATION
PUD Concept
Proposal REVIEW
(Commissions &
Council -No Decision)
PUD Concept Plan
Proposal (Optional)
Page2 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
(4)PermittedLocationsforPUDrezoning
ArezoningtoPUDmayberequestedforany residential,commercial,or
industrialzoned area,regardlessofcurrentzoning.
(5)PUDQualifications
RezoningstoPUDwillbeconsideredonlyforareasoflandinsingleownershipor
control,exceptinthefollowingcircumstances:
(a)Naturalfeaturesofthelandaresuchthatdevelopmentunderstandardzoning
regulationswouldnotbeappropriateinordertoconservesuchfeatures;
(b)ThelandisintendedtobedevelopedinaccordancewithapriorPUDadjacent
tooracrossthestreetfromthesubjectproperty;
(c)ThePUDprocessisdesirabletoensurecompatibilityandcareful
considerationoftheeffectofadevelopmentonsurroundinglanduses.
(d)Multiplepartyownershipisadequatelysecuredthroughacorporation,
partnership,orotherlegalentitythatwillensuretheabilitytofulfillallofthe
obligationsofthePUDprocess,includingapprovals,development,and
securities.
(6)PermittedUsesWithinPUDs
UseswithinaPUDshallbegovernedbytheordinanceestablishingthePUDand
bytheconditions,ifany,imposedbytheCityintheapprovalprocessandPUD
documents.
(7)ExpectationsofaDevelopmentSeekingaRezoningtoPUD
Theprovisionsofthissectionareintendedtoachievethefollowingpublicvalues
withinaPUDzoningdistrictandassociatedsubdivisionPlannedUnit
Developmentisdesignedtoallowflexibilityfromtheapplicationofstandard
zoningregulationstoachieveavarietyofpublicvaluesthatwillbeidentifiedfor
eachspecificPUDproject.Thefollowinglistrepresentsexamplesofpublic
valuesthatmaybeapplicabletoanyindividualPUDproject,butisnotnecessarily
inclusive,norareallexamplesapplicabletoallprojects:
(a)Ensurehighqualityconstructionstandardsandtheuseofhighquality
constructionmaterials;
(b)Promoteavarietyofhousingstyleswhichincludefeaturessuchassideorrear
loadedgarages,frontporches,varyingroofpitches,andfoursided
architecture/articulation;
Formatted:Tabstops:0.75",Listtab+Notat1"
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page3
(c)Eliminaterepetitionofsimilarhousingtypesbyencouragingahousing
mixturethatdiversifiesthearchitecturalqualitiesofaneighborhood;
(d)Promoteaesthetically-pleasingdesignwithintheneighborhoodandappears
attractiveandinvitingfromsurroundingparcels;
(e)Incorporateextensivelandscaping andsiteamenities inexcessofwhatis
requiredbycode;
(f)Providehigh-qualitypark,openspace,andtrailopportunitiesthatexceedthe
expectationsestablishedintheComprehensivePlan;
(g)Provide accessto aconvenientandefficientmulti-modaltransportation
systemtoservicethedailyneedsofresidentsatpeakandnon-peakuselevels,
withhighconnectivitytothelargercommunity.
(h)Promotedevelopmentthatisdesignedtoreduceinitialinfrastructurecostsand
long-termmaintenanceandoperationalcosts;
(i)Whereapplicable,maximizetheuseofecologically-basedapproachesto
stormwatermanagement,restoreorenhanceon-siteecologicalsystems,and
protectoff-siteecologicalsystemsincludingtheapplicationofLowImpact
Development(LID)practices;
(j)FosterininclusivecommunitybyprovidingFacilitate acomplementarymixof
lifecyclehousing;
(k)PreserveandprotectimportantecologicalareasidentifiedontheCity’s
naturalresourceinventory(NRI);
(k)(l)Accommodatehigherdevelopmentintensityinareaswhere
infrastructureandothersystemsarecapableofprovidingappropriatelevelsof
publicservices,andrequirelowerintensityinareaswheresuchservicesare
inadequate,orwherenaturalfeaturesrequireprotectionand/orpreservation.
(8)AreasofFlexibility
(a)TheCity mayshall consideranincreaseinthedensityorintensityofthe
project,alongwithrelatedreductionsinlotwidthandsizeifthePUD
providessubstantiallymoresiteamenitiesandpublicvalues,asoutlinedin
Section2.4(P)(7),thancouldbeachievedinaconventionaldevelopmentfor
theapplicablelandusezone.
(b)TheCitymayconsideradecreaseintheamountofroadwidthrequiredor
right-of-wayrequirementsifthePUDprovidessubstantiallymoresite
Page4 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
amenities,asoutlinedinSection2.4(P)(7)—andparticularlythoseamenities
thatwouldmitigatetrafficconcerns—thanarefoundinaconventional
developmentfortheapplicablezoningdistrict.Specificationsandstandards
forstreets,utilities,andotherpublicfacilitiesshallbeatthediscretionofCity
Councilandmustprotectthehealth,safety,comfort,aesthetics,economic
viability,andgeneralwelfareofthecity.
(c)(b)TheCity shallmay considerflexibilitywithregardto landuses,
setbacks,lotsize,width,anddepth,amongotherzoningstandards when
reviewingaPUDrezoningrequest.Specificationsandstandardsforlotsshall
beatthediscretionofCityCouncil,andshallencourageadesirableliving or
working environmentwhichassistsinachievingthegoalssetoutforPUDs.
(d)(c)TheCity mayshall considerflexibilityinthephasingofaPUD
development.ChangestotheproposedstagingortimingofaPUDmaybe
approvedbytheCityCouncilwhennecessaryorontheshowingofgood
causebythedeveloper.
(9)PUDProcedure
AllrequestsforrezoningtoPlannedUnitDevelopmentshallfollowthesteps
outlinedbelow.
(a)Collaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsetting
Thecollaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsettingstepisintendedtoallowthe
applicanttomeetwithmembersoftheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment
andappointedandelectedofficialstogainanunderstandingofthepublic
valuesrelatedtodevelopmentofthesubjectsite.Thefeedbackreceived
duringthisstepwillprovideguidancetotheapplicantonelementsand
objectivestoincorporateintoafutureconceptplan.
(i)InitiationofProceedings
ArequestforaPUDConceptPlanReviewshallbeinitiatedby
applicationofthepropertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofile
anapplicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications.
(ii)Application
1.AllapplicationsforaPUDCollaborativeprocessandprojectgoal
settingsessionshallbeinaccordancewithSection2.3,Common
ReviewRequirements.
2.Inadditiontocommonreviewrequirements,asiteanalysisshallbe
submittedinanticipationofthepre-applicationactivitieswhich
includesthefollowinginformation:
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page5
a.Locationofwoodedareasorsignificantfeatures(environmental,
historical,cultural)oftheparcel;
b.Indicatethebasefloodelevationlevel(ifapplicable)andshow
thegenerallocationoffloodwaysand/orfloodfringeareas;
c.Delineationoftheordinaryhighwaterlevelsofallwaterbodies;
d.Delineationoftheshorelanddistrictboundary(ifapplicable);
e.Generallocationsofwetlands(ifapplicable);
f.Calculationofgrossacresonthesiteproposedfordevelopment;
g.Calculationofnetacresonthesiteproposedfordevelopment,
includingacalculationof,anddeductionfromthegrossacreage
of,allwetlands,floodplains,slopesofmorethan18%,significant
woodlands,areasidentifiedintheCity’sNaturalResources
Inventory,andanyotherunbuildableareasoftheprojectsite.
h.Indicationofneighboringlandusessurroundingtheproposed
developmentsite.
(iii)CollaborativeProcessandProjectGoalSettingProcess
1.Theapplicantshallmeetwiththecitystaffforapre-application
conferencepriortosubmittalofaconceptplanapplicationtothecity.
Theprimarypurposeoftheconferenceistoallowtheapplicantand
staffanopportunitytoreviewthecomprehensiveplanandtomakea
preliminarydeterminationiftheproposalisconducivetoaPUD
rezoning.
2.Citystaffandtheapplicantshallworktogethertoschedulea
concurrentworksessionwithpolicymakersofthecity(applicable
commissionsandCityCouncil)todiscussthepublicvaluesonthe
siteusingtheestablishedpublicvaluesinSection2.4(P)(7)asa
guideline.Theresultofthismeetingwillbeapublicvalues
statement.
3.Aspartofthecollaborativeworksession,thePlanningCommission
andCityCouncilwilldirectwhethertheapplicantshallholda
neighborhoodmeeting.Thecityandallownersofpropertywithin
1,000feetoftheproposedPUD(oralargerareaasdeterminedbythe
CommunityDevelopmentDepartment)shallbegivennoticeofthe
meeting.Thepurposeofthemeetingistoinformtheneighborhood
oftheproposedPUD,discusstheconceptsandbasisfortheplan
beingdevelopedandtoobtaininformationandsuggestionsfromthe
neighborhood.
4.Theapplicantshallberesponsibleforthecostsincurredbythecity
forattorney,engineering,planning,orotherCity-incurredcosts
duringthesepre-conceptplanactivities.
Page6 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
(b)(a)PUDConcept PlanProposal
Priortosubmittingformal developmentstagePUD,preliminaryplat (as
applicable)andrezoningapplicationsfortheproposeddevelopment,the
applicant may,atitsoption,shall prepareaninformalconceptplanandpresent
ittothe appropriatePlanningcCommissions andCityCouncilataconcurrent
worksession,asscheduledbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment.The
applicantmaydecidetoholdoneormoreneighborhoodmeetings,butsuch
meeting(s)shallnotbearequirementofaPUDapplication.Thepurposeof
thismeetingtheConceptProposalan isto:determineifallpartiesareona
commontrackandifthedevelopmentreflectsthestatedpublicvalues.
Providepreliminaryfeedbackontheconcept planproposal Developa
listofpublicvalues,incollaborationbetweentheapplicant,general
public,PlanningCommission,andCityCouncil;
ProvideanopportunitytoidentifyelementsofaPublicValues
Statementthatwillgovernanddirectthedesignandelementsofthe
succeedingPUDplanstages(tobereviewedandadoptedasa
prerequisiteofDevelopmentStagePUDapproval;
ProvideaforumforpubliccommentonthePUDpriortoa
requirementforextensiveengineeringandotherplans;
Provideaforumtoidentifypotentialissuesandbenefitsofthe
proposaledPUD whichcanbeaddressedatsucceedingstagesofPUD
designandreview.;
TheapplicantmayrequestthattheConceptandDevelopmentStagePUD
applicationsbeconsideredconcurrently.Allowanceforconcurrentreview
shallbeatthesolediscretionoftheCity,andtheapplicantassumesanyrisk,
financialorotherwise,ofproceedingwithplandevelopmentbeyondthestage
atwhichtheCityhasidentifiedPUDreviewisofficiallyunderconsideration.
WithoutspecificwrittenauthorizationfromtheCommunityDevelopment
Department,noapplicationforDevelopmentStagePUDshallbeconsidered
completepriortoCityCouncilactionontheConceptStagePUD.
(i)InitiationofProceedings
ArequestforaPUDConcept PlanProposal Reviewshallbeinitiatedby
applicationof thepropertyowner andor otherperson orparty having an
interestinConceptProposal.authoritytofileanapplicationpursuantto
Section2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications.
Formatted:Indent:Left:0"
Formatted:Don'taddspacebetweenparagraphsofthe
samestyle,Bulleted+Level:1+Alignedat:1.25"+Indent
at:1.5"
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page7
(ii)ProposalSubmittalApplication
1.All proposalsapplications foraPUDConcept PlanProposal Review
shallbeinaccordancewithSection2.3,CommonReview
Requirements.
2.Inadditiontocommonreviewrequirements,proposalsapplications
foraPUDConceptPlanReviewshallalsoincludeatleastthe
informationinSection2.4(P)(9)(b)(iii)belowtobeconsidered
complete(exceptasexemptedbytheCommunityDevelopment
Department).
(iii)SpecificPUDConcept PlanProposal SubmittalRequirements
AnapplicantshallprovideTthefollowinginformation shallbeprovided
unlesswaivedbystaff:
1.Alistingofcontactinformationincludingname(s),address(es)and
phonenumber(s)of:theownerofrecord,authorizedagentsor
representatives,engineer,surveyor,andanyotherrelevantassociates;
2.Alistingofthefollowingsitedata:Address,currentzoning,parcel
sizeinacresandsquarefeetandcurrentlegaldescription(s);
3.Anupdatedsiteanalysisincorporatinganyadditionalfeaturesor
requestedchangesidentifiedduringthecollaborativeprocessand
projectgoalsettingsession;
4.3.Anarrativeexplaining theapplicant’s proposedobjectivesforthe
PUD,andpublicvaluesthat theapplicantbelieves maybeachieved
bytheproject;howtheidentifiedpublicvaluesforthesiteare
addressedbytheconceptplan;
5.4.Alistingofgeneralinformationincludingthenumberofproposed
residentialunits,commercialandindustriallandusesbycategoryof
use,publicuseareasincludingadescriptionofproposeduse,andany
otherlanduseproposedaspartofthePUD;
6.5.Calculationoftheproposeddensityoftheprojectandthepotential
densityunderstandardzoningregulations,includingbothgross
densityandnetdensity,accountingfordevelopableand
undevelopableland.Undevelopablelandshallincludeallwetlands,
floodplains,sensitiveecologicalareasidentifiedintheNatural
ResourceInventory,slopesgreaterthan18%,poorsoilsandareasof
concentratedwoodlands.
7.6.Outlinea conceptual developmentscheduleindicatingthe
approximatedatewhenconstructionoftheproject,orstagesofthe
same,canbeexpectedtobeginandbecompleted(includingthe
proposedphasingofconstructionofpublicimprovementsand
recreationalandcommonspaceareas).
Page8 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
8.7.AConceptPUDProposallan illustratingthenatureandtypeof
proposeddevelopment.Ataminimum,theplanshouldshow
a.Areacalculationsforgrosslandarea
b.Existingzoningdistrict(s)
c.Layoutofproposedlotsandproposeduses.Denoteoutlots
plannedforpublicdedicationand/oropenspace(schools,parks,
etc.)
d.Areacalculationsforeachparcel
e.Generallocationofwetlandsand/orwatercoursesoverthe
propertyandwithin200feetoftheperimeterofthesubdivision
parcel
f.Locationofexistingandproposedstreetswithinandimmediately
adjacenttothesubdivisionparcel
g.Proposedsidewalksandtrails
h.Proposedparkingareas
i.Proposedparks,commonareas,andpreservationeasements
(indicatepublicvs.privateifapplicable)
j.Generallocationofwoodedareasorsignificantfeatures
(environmental,historical,cultural)oftheparcel
k.Locationofutilitysystemsthatwillservetheproperty
l.Other:Anapplicantmaysubmitanyadditionalinformationthat
mayexplaintheproposedPUD.
9.8.Alistingoftheareasofflexibilityfromthestandardzoning
soughtthattheapplicantisseeking throughtheuseofPUDdesign.
(iv)PUDConceptPlan Proposal Review
1.Uponreceivinga complete PUDconceptplan
proposalapplication,theCommunityDevelopment
Department,alongwithotherdesignatedstaff,shall
reviewtheproposalandgenerateastaffreportanalyzing
theproposalagainsttheexpectationsforPUDs.Thereport
shallbeforwardedtotheappropriatecommissions—as
determinedbytheCommunityDevelopmentDirector.
2.CommissionsreceivingthereportshallreviewthePUDrezoningrequest,
andmakearecommendationtotheCityCouncilwithregardtotheplat
layout,design,density,uses,deviations,andachievedpublicvaluesofthe
conceptplan.ThePlanningCommissionshallberesponsiblefortheformal
commentstotheCityCouncil.Otherstaffandcommissionreportsshallbe
providedtothePlanningCommissionandmadeapartofthePlanning
Commission’sreport.
Formatted:Font:TimesNewRoman,11pt
Formatted:ListParagraph,Don'taddspacebetween
paragraphsofthesamestyle,Linespacing:Exactly15pt,No
widow/orphancontrol,Tabstops:1.75",Listtab
Formatted:Font:TimesNewRoman,11pt
Formatted:Indent:Left:2",Numbered+Level:5+
NumberingStyle:a,b,c,…+Startat:1+Alignment:Left+
Alignedat:2.25"+Indentat:2.5",Tabstops:Notat2.5"
Formatted:Indent:Left:1",Tabstops:1",Listtab+Not
at1.5"+2.5"
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page9
1.scheduleajointmeetingoftThe Planning Commission andCity
Councilandshallprovidenoticeofthemeetingtoallproperty
ownerswithin350’ofthepropertyboundaryoftheproposal.shall
holdapublichearingandconsidertheapplication’sconsistency
withtheintentandpurposeofthePUDandcomprehensiveplan
goals.Theplanningcommissionshallmakerecommendationsto
theCityCouncilonDuringtheconcurrentmeeting,thePlanning
CommissionandCityCouncilmaymakecommenton themerit,
neededchanges,,and potentialpublicvalues,aswellas suggested
conditions whichmayassisttheproposerinfutureapplicationof
thefor proposedrezoningandPUDdevelopmentplan.
a.ThePlanningCommissionandCityCouncilmayalsotake
commentfromthepublicaspartofthejointmeeting.
3.b.TheCouncil andPlanningCommission shall makeno
formaldecisionaspartofthe considerationerthe
recommendationsofthecommissionsthathaveconducted
areview,andprovidefeedbacktotheapplicantonthe
proposedpublicvalues,proposeddeviations,andany
otheraspectoftheapplication.TheCouncilshalleither
makeamotionthattheapplicant—iftheychooseto
proceed—moveforwardwiththePUDpreliminaryplat
andrezoningrequests,ordirecttheapplicanttosubmita
developmentapplicationusingconventionalzoning
districtstandards.TheCouncilshallmakeitsfinding
withinthetimeallottedbyMinn.Stat.Section15.99,and
maytakeuptheapplicationwithoutPlanningCommission
actionifthePlanningCommissionhasnotactedwithin
sixty(60)daysofitsoriginalpublichearingdate.TheCity
Council andPlanningCommission’s commentsfindings
areexplicitlynotanapproval ordecisiononof theproject,
andareintendedtorepresent preliminaryfeedbackrelated
tothisPUDordinance,thecomplianceoftheproposed
projectwiththePublicValuesStatement,theapplicable
zoningregulations,andtheComprehensivePlan.
4.AftertheCitypolicymakershavereviewedandcommentedontheConcept
PUDplan,citystaffshallmeetwithanyotherresponsibleagencies,as
applicable,toexploreopportunitiesofpartnershiptoenhancethestated
publicvalues.
(c)(b)PUD DevelopmentStage,PreliminaryPlat,andRezoning–
DevelopmentStagePUD
(i)InitiationofProceedings
Formatted:Indent:Left:1.5",Numbered+Level:4+
NumberingStyle:1,2,3,…+Startat:1+Alignment:Left+
Alignedat:1.75"+Indentat:2",Tabstops:Notat2.5"
Formatted:Font:NotBold
Formatted:Font:NotBold
Formatted:Font:NotBold
Formatted:Font:NotBold
Formatted:Font:NotBold
Formatted:Font:NotBold
Formatted:Font:NotBold
Formatted:Font:NotBold
Formatted:Indent:Left:2",Numbered+Level:5+
NumberingStyle:a,b,c,…+Startat:1+Alignment:Left+
Alignedat:2.25"+Indentat:2.5",Tabstops:Notat2.5"
Formatted:Indent:Left:1",Tabstops:1",Listtab+Not
at1.5"+2.5"
Page10 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
1.ConcurrentapplicationsforPUDDevelopmentStage,rezoningto
PUD,andaPreliminaryPlatshallbesubmittedtotheCitywithinone
yearoftheCityCouncil’sfindingsonthePUDConceptPlan.Failure
tosubmitapplicationsforPUDDevelopmentStage,rezoningtoPUD
andaPreliminaryPlatwithinoneyearoftheCityCouncil’sfindings
willrequiretheapplicanttobegintheprocesswithanewConcept
StageapplicationwiththeCollaborativePUDmeeting.
2.1.RTherequestsfor PUDDevelopmentStage,rezoningtoPUDand
PreliminaryPlatshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationoftheproperty
ownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuant
toSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications.TheDevelopment
StagePUDrequest constitutesaseparateapplicationand shallbe
subjectto new timelines setbyforthepurposesof Minn.Stat.Section
15.99.
(ii)Application
1.AllapplicationsforrezoningtoPUDandPreliminaryPlatshallbein
accordancewithSection2.3,CommonReviewRequirements.
2.TheapplicationforrezoningtoPUDshallbeinaccordancewith
Section2.4(B),ZoningOrdinanceTextandZoningMap
Amendments.
3.TheapplicationforPreliminaryPlat (asapplicable)shallbein
accordancewithCityCodeTitle11,Chapter4,DataRequiredfor
PreliminaryandFinalPlats;andshallincludetheadditional
informationrequirementslistedinSection2.4(P)(9)(c)(iii)belowto
beconsideredcomplete(exceptasexemptedbytheCommunity
DevelopmentDepartment).
4.IfthePUDisproposedtodevelopoveratimeframeexceedingtwo
years,aPUDPhasingPlanfortheentireproject(tobecompletedin
phases)maybesubmitted.SubsequentPUDFinalPlanapplications
wouldonlygrantapprovalforanindividualphase.
(iii)SpecificPUD DevelopmentStage,/PreliminaryPlat andRezoning
SubmittalRequirements
AnapplicantshallprovideaseparatePUDDevelopment Stage Plan
clearlydelineatingtheproposeddevelopmentandallfeaturesnot
consistentwithunderlyingzoningregulations(e.g.setbackdeviations).
Ataminimum,theplanshouldshow:
1.AllrequiredinformationperSection2.4(P)(9)(b)(iii)ofthis
ordinance.
1.2.Administrativeinformation(includingidentificationofthedrawingas
a“Preliminary PUDDevelopment Stage Plan,”theproposednameof
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page11
the subdivisionproject,contactinformationforthedeveloperand
individualpreparingtheplan,signatureofthesurveyor andcivil
engineer certifyingthedocument,dateofplanpreparationorrevision,
andagraphicscaleandtruenortharrow);
2.3.Areacalculationsforgrosslandarea,wetlandareas,wetlandbuffers,
right-of-waydedications,conservationareas,andproposedpublicand
privateparks;
3.4.Existingzoningdistrict(s);
4.5.Layoutofproposedlotswithfuturelotandblocknumbers.The
perimeterboundarylineofthesubdivisionshouldbedistinguishable
fromtheotherpropertylines.Denoteoutlotsplannedforpublic
dedicationand/oropenspace(schools,parks,etc.);
5.6.Areacalculationsforeachparcel;
6.7.Proposedsetbacksoneachlot(formingthebuildingpad)and
calculatedbuildablearea;
7.8.Proposedgrosshardcoverallowanceperlot(ifapplicable);
8.9.Existingcontoursatintervalsoftwofeet.Contoursmustextenda
minimumof200feetbeyondtheboundaryoftheparcel(s)in
question;
9.10.Delineationofwetlandsand/orwatercoursesoverthe
propertyandwithin200feetoftheperimeterofthesubdivision
parcel;
10.11.Delineationoftheordinaryhighwaterlevelsofallwater
bodies;
11.12.Gradingdrainageanderosioncontrolplanpreparedbya
registeredprofessionalengineer,providingallinformationoutlinedin
MonticelloZoningCode,Chapter4,Section10(C);
12.13.Location,width,andnamesofexistingandproposedstreets
withinandimmediatelyadjacenttothesubdivisionparcel;
13.14.Easementsandrights-of-waywithinoradjacenttothe
subdivisionparcel(s);
14.15.Thelocationandorientationofproposedbuildings;
15.16.Coloredbuildingelevationswhichdetailthematerialsbeing
used;
16.17.Proposedsidewalksandtrails;
17.18.Vehicularcirculationsystemshowinglocationanddimension
foralldriveways,parkingspaces,parkinglotaisles,serviceroads,
loadingareas,firelanes,emergencyaccess,ifnecessary,publicand
privatestreets,alleys,sidewalks,bikepaths,directionoftrafficflow
andtrafficcontroldevices;
Page12 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
18.19.Lightinglocation,styleandmountingandlightdistribution
plan.
19.20.Proposedparks,commonareas,andpreservationeasements
(indicatepublicvs.privateifapplicable);
20.21.Landscapeplanpreparedbyaqualifiedprofessional
providingallinformationoutlinedinMonticelloZoningOrdinance
Section4.1(D)includingplantingcounts,sizesandspecies;
21.22.Locationanddetailofsignageprovidingallpertinent
informationoutlinedinMonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection
2.4(K)(3)(b).
22.23.Location,accessandscreeningdetailoflargetrashhandling
andrecyclingcollectionareasincompliancewiththerequirementsof
MonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection5.3(D)(30).
23.24.AnyotherinformationasdirectedbytheCommunity
DevelopmentDepartment.
(iv)PUD DevelopmentStage,PreliminaryPlatandRezoningtoPUD
Review
1.TheapplicationforrezoningtoPUDshallbereviewedinaccordance
withSection2.4(B),ZoningOrdinanceTextandZoningMap
Amendments.
2.TheapplicationforPreliminaryPlatshallbereviewedinaccordance
withCityCodeTitle11,Chapter3,Section2,PreliminaryPlat
Procedure.
3.Aspartofthereviewprocessforbothapplications,theCommunity
DevelopmentDepartmentshallgenerate aPublicValuesStatement
basedonconsiderationraisedattheConceptPUDreviews,an
analysisoftheproposalagainsttheexpectationsforPUDs andthis
ordinanceandthepreviouslyestablisheddraftpublicvaluesstatement
toformulatearecommendationregardingtherezoningtothe
pPlanning cCommissionandCityCouncil.
4.The Pplanning Ccommissionshallholdapublichearingandconsider
theapplication’sconsistencywiththeintentandpurposeofthePUD
andcomprehensiveplangoals.The pPlanning cCommissionshall
makerecommendationstotheCityCouncilonthemerit,needed
changes,andsuggestedconditionsoftheproposedrezoning,
preliminaryplatandPUDdevelopmentplan.
5.Inapprovingordenyingthe PUDDevelopmentStageapplicationand
ordinancetorezonethesubjectpropertytoPUD,theCityCouncil
shallmakefindingsonthefollowing:
Formatted:Indent:Left:0"
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page13
a.WhethertheThe PUDplanisconsistentwiththecity’s
comprehensiveplan;
b.TheWhetherthe PUDplanistailoredtothespecific
characteristicsofthesiteandachievesahigherqualityofsite
planningandgreaterpublicbenefitsthanwouldbeachieved
underconventionalprovisionsoftheordinance;
c.HowWhetherthe thePUDplanaddressesthepurposeandintent
ofthePUDrezoninglaidoutinSection2.4(P)(1),andthepublic
valuesstatementestablishedatthebeginningoftheprocess;
d.TheWhetherthe PUDplanaddressestheexpectationsofaPUD
laidoutinSection2.4(P)(7);
e.TheWhetherthe PUDplanmaintainsorimprovestheefficiency
ofpublicstreets,utilities,andotherpublicservices;
f.TheWhetherthe PUDplanresultsindevelopmentcompatible
withexistingadjacentandfutureguidedlanduses;
g.WhetherthePUDcanbeaccommodatedbyexistingpublic
services,suchasparks,police,fire,administration,andutilities,
orthedeveloperhasprovidedforthegrowthandextensionof
suchservicesasacomponentofthePUD.
h.WhetherthePUDisdesignedtotakeadvantageof,andpreserve,
thenaturalfeaturesofthesubjectproperty,includingwaterways,
forestedareas,naturalprairie,topography,views,etc.
6.Anordinancerezoningthepropertyshallbe preparedbytheCity
adopted,forreviewattheDevelopmentStagePUD,butadoptionof
suchordinanceshalloccuronlyuponapprovaloftheFinalStage
PUD.thatincludesaneffectivedatethatcoincideswiththeapproval
andrecordingoftheFinalPlatfortheproperty.
(d)(c)PUD FinalStageand FinalPlat
(i)InitiationofProceedings
1.A FinalStagePUDplanand finalplatthatconformswiththe
approvedDevelopmentStagePUDand preliminaryplatand
associatedPUDrezoningordinanceshallbesubmitted andreviewed
awithin thetimeallottedbyMinn.Stat.Section15.99.180daysof
approvalofthepreliminaryplatapproval,unlessotherwiseextended
bytheCityCouncil.Iftheapplicantfailstosubmitafinalplat
applicationorextensionrequestwithinthistimeperiod,thePUD
applicationshallbeconsideredvoidandtheapplicantshallbe
requiredtobegintheprocesswiththeCollaborativePUDmeeting.
2.TherequestforPUD FinalStageand FinalPlatshallbeinitiatedby
applicationofthepropertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthorityto
Page14 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
fileanapplicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFile
Applications.
(ii)Application
1.AllapplicationsforPUD FinalStageand FinalPlatshallbein
accordancewithSection2.3,CommonReviewRequirements.
2.TheapplicationforPUDFinalPlatshallbeinaccordancewithCity
CodeTitle11,Chapter4,DataRequiredforPreliminaryandFinal
Plats.
3.Inadditiontogeneralcitycoderequirements,applicationsforaPUD
FinalStageand FinalPlatshallalsoincludeatleasttheinformationin
Section2.4(P)(9)(d)(iii)belowtobeconsideredcomplete(exceptas
exemptedbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment).
(iii)SpecificPUD FinalStageand FinalPlatSubmittalRequirements
1.IfaPUDMasterPlanfortheentireprojectwassubmittedand
approvedaspartofthe PUDDevelopmentStagepreliminaryplat
review,anupdatedMasterPlanshallbesubmittedincorporatingall
changesrequiredbythe PUDDevelopmentStagepreliminaryplat
approval.
2.ThePUDDevelopment Stage Planshallbeupdatedtoincorporateall
changesrequiredbythe PUD,preliminaryplatandrezoning
approvals.Thisdocumentmustclearlyshowalldeviationsfrom
standardzoningbeingapprovedaspartofthePUD.
3.TheCityshallprepare,andtheapplicantshallexecute,adeveloper’s
agreementwhichreferencesallPUDplans,developmentphasing,
requiredimprovements,completiondatesforimprovements,the
requiredletterofcredit,allrequireddevelopmentfees,escrows,and
warranties,andanyotherinformationdeemednecessarybytheCity.
4.TheCityshall,upon approvalofthePUDFinalStage,recordingof
theFinalPlat,andexecutionofthePUDdeveloper’s
agreement,recordingoftheFinalPlat,publishthePUDOrdinance
specifyinglanduse,densities,performancestandards,andongoing
generalobligationsofoccupantsofthePUD.Suchordinanceshall
createazoningdistrictthatisspecifictothepropertyforwhichthe
PUDwasapplied,andshallbedesignatedinsuchawayastobeable
tomarktheofficialzoningmaptoidentifythePUDordinance.The
PUDordinanceshallalsodesignatethatsuchpropertyisthereby
rezonedtothePUDdistrictasadopted.
5.Up-to-datetitleevidenceforthesubjectpropertyinaformacceptable
totheCityshallbeprovidedaspartoftheapplicationforthePUD
FinalPlat.
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page15
6.DevelopershallprovidewarrantydeedsforPropertybeingdedicated
totheCityforallparks,outlots,etc.,freefromallliensand
encumbrancesexceptasotherwisewaivedbytheCityCouncil.
7.Developershallprovidealleasementdedicationdocumentsfor
easementsnotshownonthefinalplatincludingthosefortrails,
ingress/egress,etc.,togetherwithallnecessaryconsentstothe
easementbyexistingencumbrancersoftheproperty.
(iv)PUD FinalStageand FinalPlatReview
TheapplicationforPUD FinalStageand FinalPlatshallbe consideredby
theCityCouncilatapublicmeeting,followingareviewandreportbythe
CommunityDevelopmentDepartment.TheCityCouncilmayreferthe
FinalStagePUDandFinalPlattothePlanningCommission,orother
applicablecommissions,ifdesired.ApprovalofthePUDFinalStageand
FinalPlatshallbebysimplemajorityvoteoftheCityCouncil,except
whereStatelawmayspecificallyrequireasupermajority.reviewedin
accordancewithCityCodeTitle11,Chapter3,Section3,FinalPlat
Procedure..
(10)PUDAmendments
ApprovedPUD’smaybeamendedfromtimetotimeasaresultofunforeseen
circumstances,overlookedopportunities,orrequestsfromadeveloper.Atsucha
time,theapplicantshallmakeanapplicationtothecityforaPUDamendment.
Allsuchamendmentswillbeprocessedasoneofthefollowing:
(a)AdministrativeAmendment–TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentmay
approveminorchangesinthelocation,placement,andheightofbuildingsif
suchchangesarerequiredbyengineeringorothercircumstances,providedthe
conformtothereviewcriteriaappliedbythePlanningCommissionandCity
Council,andareconsistentwithallrequirementsofthePUDordinance.
Undernocircumstancesshallanadministrativeamendmentallowadditional
storiestobuildings,additionallots,orchangestodesignatedusesestablished
aspartofthePUD.AnAdministrativeAmendmentshallbememorializedvia
lettersignedbytheCommunityDevelopmentDirectorandrecordedagainst
thePUDproperty.
(b)PUDAdjustment–anadjustmenttoaPUDmaybemadethroughreviewand
approvalbyasimplemajorityvoteoftheCityCouncilwithorwithout
referraltothePlanningCommission.ForaPUDAdjustment,theapplicant
shallfollowtheproceduresandrequirementsofthePUDFinalStageas
identifiedinthisChapter.APUDAdjustmentshallbememorializedwithan
amendmenttothePUDDevelopmentAgreement,executedbytheCityand
Page16 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
applicant,andrecordedagainstthePUDproperty.Toqualifyforthisreview,
theminoradjustmentshallnot:
(i)Eliminate,diminishorbedisruptivetothepreservationandprotectionof
sensitivesitefeatures.
(ii)Eliminate,diminishorcompromisethehighqualityofsiteplanning,
design,landscapingorbuildingmaterials.
(iii)Altersignificantlythelocationofbuildings,parkingareasorroads.
(iv)Increaseordecreasethenumberofresidentialdwellingunitsbymore
thanfivepercent.
(v)Increasethegrossfloorareaofnon-residentialbuildingsbymorethan
threepercentorincreasethegrossfloorareaofanyindividualbuildingby
morethanfivepercent(residentiallotsnotguidedforspecificstructure
sizesareexcludedfromthisrequirement).
(vi)Increasethenumberofstoriesofanybuilding.
(vii)Decreasetheamountofopenspaceoralteritinsuchawayastochange
itsoriginaldesignorintendedfunctionoruse.
(viii)Createnon-compliancewithanyconditionattachedtotheapprovalofthe
FinalPUDPlan.
(c)PUDAmendment–anychangenotqualifyingforanadministrative
amendmentoraPUDadjustmentshallrequireaPUDamendment.An
applicationtoamendaPUDshallbeadministeredinthesamemannerasthat
requiredforaninitialPUDbeginningatPUD DevelopmentStageand
PreliminaryPlat.
(11)PUDCancellation
APUDshallonlybecancelledandrevokedupontheCityCounciladoptingan
ordinancerescindingtheordinanceapprovingthePUD.CancellationofaPUD
shallincludefindingsthatdemonstratethatthePUDisinconsistentwiththe
ComprehensivePlanorotherapplicationlanduseregulations,threatenspublic
safety,health,orwelfare,orotherapplicablefindingsinaccordancewithlaw.In
anyevent,itshallnotbenecessaryforthecounciltofindthecreationofaPUD
districtwasinerror.TheordinancerevokingthePUDshallincludeasection
rezoningthepropertytoagriculturaluse,ortheCityCouncilmaydeterminethata
moreappropriatebasezoningdistrictshouldbechosentofurthertheintentand
objectivesoftheComprehensivePlan.
(12)Administration
Ingeneral,thefollowingrulesshallapplytoallPUDs:
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page17
(a)Rulesandregulations:NorequirementoutlinedinthePUDprocessshall
restricttheCityCouncilfromtakingactiononanapplicationifnecessaryto
meetstatemandatedtimedeadlines;
(b)Preconstruction:Nobuildingpermitshallbegrantedforanybuildingonland
forwhichaPUDplanisintheprocessofreview,unlesstheproposed
buildingisallowedundertheexistingzoningandwillnotimpact,influence,
orinterferewiththeproposedPUDplan.
(c)EffectonConveyedProperty.Intheeventanyrealpropertyintheapproved
PUDAgreementisconveyedintotal,orinpart,thebuyersthereofshallbe
boundbytheprovisionsoftheapprovedFinalPUDPlanconstitutingapart
thereofaswellasthePUDzoningordinance;provided,however,thatnothing
hereinshallbeconstruedtocreatenon-conforminglots,buildingsites,
buildingsorusesbyvirtueofanysuchconveyanceofalot,buildingsite,
buildingorpartofthedevelopmentcreatedpursuanttoandinconformance
withtheapprovedPUD.
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page1
(P)PlannedUnitDevelopments
(1)PurposeandIntent
ThepurposeofthePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)zoningdistrictistoprovide
greaterflexibilityinthedevelopmentofneighborhoodsandnon-residentialareas
inordertomaximizepublicvaluesandachievemorecreativedevelopment
outcomeswhileremainingeconomicallyviableandmarketable.Thisisachieved
byundertakingaprocessthatresultsinadevelopmentoutcomeexceedingthat
whichistypicallyachievablethroughtheconventionalzoningdistrict.TheCity
reservestherighttodenythePUDrezoninganddirectthedevelopertore-apply
underthestandardapplicablezoningdistrict.
(2)InitiationofProceedings
ApplicationsforaPUDshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthepropertyowneror
otherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B),
AuthoritytoFileApplications.
(3)ReflectionontheOfficialZoningMap
(a)PUDprovisionsprovideanoptionalmethodofregulatinglandusewhich
permitsflexibilityinallowedusesandotherregulatingprovisions.Insome
circumstances,however,rulesandregulationsgoverningtheoriginalzoning
district,orotherzoningregulationsfoundelsewhereintheCity’sordinances,
maybeappropriatetoapplywithinthePUD.Assuch,approvalofaPlanned
UnitDevelopmentandexecutionofaPUDagreementshallrequirethe
propertyinquestionberezonedtoPUD.ForeachPUDDistrict,aspecific
ordinanceshallbeadopted,alongwithatrackingdesignationforuseonthe
officialzoningmaptodistinguishitfromotherPUDdistrictsandidentifythe
adoptedordinanceintheCityCode.OnceaPUDhasbeengrantedandisin
effectforaparcel,nobuildingpermitshallbeissuedforthatparcelwhichis
notinconformancewiththeapprovedPUDPlan,thecurrentMinnesotaState
BuildingCodeandallassociateddocuments,andwithallotherapplicable
CityCodeprovisions.
(b)AllPUDrezoningsapprovedpriortotheeffectivedateofthisordinanceshall
retaintheirzoningclassificationsofR-PUD,andshallcontinuetobe
governedbytheordinanceandresolutionswhichcreatedtheseareas.
(c)AllPUDspreviouslygrantedbyConditionalUsePermitshallcontinuetobe
regulatedunderthetermsoftheCUP.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
PUDFinalStage
Plat&Rezoning
REVIEW
(Staff,applicable
Commissions&
Council)
PUD Final Stage
and Final Plat
APPLICATION
PUD Development
Stage,Preliminary
Plat &Rezoning
REVIEW
(Staff,applicable
Commissions &
Council)
PUD Development
Stage,Preliminary
Plat and Rezoning
APPLICATION
PUD Concept
Proposal REVIEW
(Commissions &
Council -No Decision)
PUD Concept Plan
Proposal (Optional)
Page2 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
(4)PermittedLocationsforPUDrezoning
ArezoningtoPUDmayberequestedforanyarea,regardlessofcurrentzoning.
(5)PUDQualifications
RezoningstoPUDwillbeconsideredonlyforareasoflandinsingleownershipor
control,exceptinthefollowingcircumstances:
(a)Naturalfeaturesofthelandaresuchthatdevelopmentunderstandardzoning
regulationswouldnotbeappropriateinordertoconservesuchfeatures;
(b)ThelandisintendedtobedevelopedinaccordancewithapriorPUDadjacent
tooracrossthestreetfromthesubjectproperty;
(c)ThePUDprocessisdesirabletoensurecompatibilityandcareful
considerationoftheeffectofadevelopmentonsurroundinglanduses.
(d)Multiplepartyownershipisadequatelysecuredthroughacorporation,
partnership,orotherlegalentitythatwillensuretheabilitytofulfillallofthe
obligationsofthePUDprocess,includingapprovals,development,and
securities.
(6)PermittedUsesWithinPUDs
UseswithinaPUDshallbegovernedbytheordinanceestablishingthePUDand
bytheconditions,ifany,imposedbytheCityintheapprovalprocessandPUD
documents.
(7)ExpectationsofaDevelopmentSeekingaRezoningtoPUD
PlannedUnitDevelopmentisdesignedtoallowflexibilityfromtheapplicationof
standardzoningregulationstoachieveavarietyofpublicvaluesthatwillbe
identifiedforeachspecificPUDproject.Thefollowinglistrepresentsexamples
ofpublicvaluesthatmaybeapplicabletoanyindividualPUDproject,butisnot
necessarilyinclusive,norareallexamplesapplicabletoallprojects:
(a)Ensurehighqualityconstructionstandardsandtheuseofhighquality
constructionmaterials;
(b)Promoteavarietyofhousingstyleswhichincludefeaturessuchassideorrear
loadedgarages,frontporches,varyingroofpitches,andfoursided
architecture/articulation;
(c)Eliminaterepetitionofsimilarhousingtypesbyencouragingahousing
mixturethatdiversifiesthearchitecturalqualitiesofaneighborhood;
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page3
(d)Promoteaesthetically-pleasingdesignwithintheneighborhoodandappears
attractiveandinvitingfromsurroundingparcels;
(e)Incorporateextensivelandscapingandsiteamenitiesinexcessofwhatis
requiredbycode;
(f)Providehigh-qualitypark,openspace,andtrailopportunitiesthatexceedthe
expectationsestablishedintheComprehensivePlan;
(g)Provideaccesstoaconvenientandefficientmulti-modaltransportation
systemtoservicethedailyneedsofresidentsatpeakandnon-peakuselevels,
withhighconnectivitytothelargercommunity.
(h)Promotedevelopmentthatisdesignedtoreduceinitialinfrastructurecostsand
long-termmaintenanceandoperationalcosts;
(i)Whereapplicable,maximizetheuseofecologically-basedapproachesto
stormwatermanagement,restoreorenhanceon-siteecologicalsystems,and
protectoff-siteecologicalsystemsincludingtheapplicationofLowImpact
Development(LID)practices;
(j)Facilitateacomplementarymixoflifecyclehousing;
(k)PreserveandprotectimportantecologicalareasidentifiedontheCity’s
naturalresourceinventory(NRI);
(l)Accommodatehigherdevelopmentintensityinareaswhereinfrastructureand
othersystemsarecapableofprovidingappropriatelevelsofpublicservices,
andrequirelowerintensityinareaswheresuchservicesareinadequate,or
wherenaturalfeaturesrequireprotectionand/orpreservation.
(8)AreasofFlexibility
(a)TheCitymayconsideranincreaseinthedensityorintensityoftheproject,
alongwithrelatedreductionsinlotwidthandsizeifthePUDprovides
substantiallymoresiteamenitiesandpublicvalues,asoutlinedinSection
2.4(P)(7),thancouldbeachievedinaconventionaldevelopmentforthe
applicablelandusezone.
(b)TheCitymayconsiderflexibilitywithregardtolanduses,setbacks,lotsize,
width,anddepth,amongotherzoningstandardswhenreviewingaPUD
rezoningrequest.Specificationsandstandardsforlotsshallbeatthe
discretionofCityCouncil,andshallencourageadesirablelivingorworking
environmentwhichassistsinachievingthegoalssetoutforPUDs.
Page4 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
(c)TheCitymayconsiderflexibilityinthephasingofaPUDdevelopment.
ChangestotheproposedstagingortimingofaPUDmaybeapprovedbythe
CityCouncilwhennecessaryorontheshowingofgoodcausebythe
developer.
(9)PUDProcedure
AllrequestsforrezoningtoPlannedUnitDevelopmentshallfollowthesteps
outlinedbelow.
(a)PUDConceptProposal
PriortosubmittingformaldevelopmentstagePUD,preliminaryplat(as
applicable)andrezoningapplicationsfortheproposeddevelopment,the
applicantmay,atitsoption,prepareaninformalconceptplanandpresentitto
thePlanningCommissionandCityCouncilataconcurrentworksession,as
scheduledbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment.Thepurposeofthe
ConceptProposalisto:
Providepreliminaryfeedbackontheconceptproposalin
collaborationbetweentheapplicant,generalpublic,Planning
Commission,andCityCouncil;
ProvideaforumforpubliccommentonthePUDpriortoa
requirementforextensiveengineeringandotherplans;
Provideaforumtoidentifypotentialissuesandbenefitsofthe
proposalwhichcanbeaddressedatsucceedingstagesofPUDdesign
andreview.
(i)InitiationofProceedings
ArequestforaPUDConceptProposalReviewshallbeinitiatedbythe
propertyownerandotherpersonorpartyhavinganinterestinConcept
Proposal..
(ii)ProposalSubmittal
1.AllproposalsforaPUDConceptProposalReviewshallbein
accordancewithSection2.3,CommonReviewRequirements.
2.Inadditiontocommonreviewrequirements,proposalsforaPUD
ConceptPlanReviewshallalsoincludeatleasttheinformationin
Section2.4(P)(9)(b)(iii)belowtobeconsideredcomplete(exceptas
exemptedbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment).
(iii)SpecificPUDConceptProposalSubmittalRequirements
Thefollowinginformationshallbeprovidedunlesswaivedbystaff:
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page5
1.Alistingofcontactinformationincludingname(s),address(es)and
phonenumber(s)of:theownerofrecord,authorizedagentsor
representatives,engineer,surveyor,andanyotherrelevantassociates;
2.Alistingofthefollowingsitedata:Address,currentzoning,parcel
sizeinacresandsquarefeetandcurrentlegaldescription(s);
3.AnarrativeexplainingproposedobjectivesforthePUD,andpublic
valuesthatmaybeachievedbytheproject;;
4.Alistingofgeneralinformationincludingthenumberofproposed
residentialunits,commercialandindustriallandusesbycategoryof
use,publicuseareasincludingadescriptionofproposeduse,andany
otherlanduseproposedaspartofthePUD;
5.Calculationoftheproposeddensityoftheprojectandthepotential
densityunderstandardzoningregulations,includingbothgross
densityandnetdensity,accountingfordevelopableand
undevelopableland.Undevelopablelandshallincludeallwetlands,
floodplains,sensitiveecologicalareasidentifiedintheNatural
ResourceInventory,slopesgreaterthan18%,poorsoilsandareasof
concentratedwoodlands.
6.Outlineaconceptualdevelopmentscheduleindicatingthe
approximatedatewhenconstructionoftheproject,orstagesofthe
same,canbeexpectedtobeginandbecompleted(includingthe
proposedphasingofconstructionofpublicimprovementsand
recreationalandcommonspaceareas).
7.AConceptPUDProposalillustratingthenatureandtypeofproposed
development.Ataminimum,theplanshouldshow
a.Areacalculationsforgrosslandarea
b.Existingzoningdistrict(s)
c.Layoutofproposedlotsandproposeduses.Denoteoutlots
plannedforpublicdedicationand/oropenspace(schools,parks,
etc.)
d.Areacalculationsforeachparcel
e.Generallocationofwetlandsand/orwatercoursesoverthe
propertyandwithin200feetoftheperimeterofthesubdivision
parcel
f.Locationofexistingandproposedstreetswithinandimmediately
adjacenttothesubdivisionparcel
g.Proposedsidewalksandtrails
h.Proposedparkingareas
i.Proposedparks,commonareas,andpreservationeasements
(indicatepublicvs.privateifapplicable)
Page6 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
j.Generallocationofwoodedareasorsignificantfeatures
(environmental,historical,cultural)oftheparcel
k.Locationofutilitysystemsthatwillservetheproperty
l.Other:Anapplicantmaysubmitanyadditionalinformationthat
mayexplaintheproposedPUD.
8.Alistingoftheareasofflexibilityfromthestandardzoningsought
throughtheuseofPUDdesign.
(iv)PUDConceptPlanProposalReview
1.UponreceivingaPUDconceptplanproposal,theCommunity
DevelopmentDepartmentshallscheduleajointmeetingofthe
PlanningCommissionandCityCouncilandshallprovidenoticeof
themeetingtoallpropertyownerswithin350’oftheproperty
boundaryoftheproposal.Duringtheconcurrentmeeting,the
PlanningCommissionandCityCouncilmaymakecommentonthe
merit,neededchanges,andsuggestedconditionswhichmayassist
theproposerinfutureapplicationforproposedrezoningandPUD
developmentplan.
a.ThePlanningCommissionandCityCouncilmayalsotake
commentfromthepublicaspartofthejointmeeting.
b.TheCouncilandPlanningCommissionshallmakeno
formaldecisionaspartoftheconsiderationTheCity
CouncilandPlanningCommission’scommentsare
explicitlynotanapprovalordecisionontheproject,and
areintendedtorepresentpreliminaryfeedbackrelatedto
thisPUDordinance,theapplicablezoningregulations,and
theComprehensivePlan.
(b)PUDDevelopmentStage,PreliminaryPlat,andRezoning–
(i)InitiationofProceedings
1.RequestsforPUDDevelopmentStage,rezoningtoPUDand
PreliminaryPlatshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationoftheproperty
ownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuant
toSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications.TheDevelopment
StagePUDrequestshallbesubjecttotimelinessetbyMinn.Stat.
Section15.99.
(ii)Application
1.AllapplicationsforrezoningtoPUDandPreliminaryPlatshallbein
accordancewithSection2.3,CommonReviewRequirements.
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page7
2.TheapplicationforrezoningtoPUDshallbeinaccordancewith
Section2.4(B),ZoningOrdinanceTextandZoningMap
Amendments.
3.TheapplicationforPreliminaryPlat(asapplicable)shallbein
accordancewithCityCodeTitle11,Chapter4,DataRequiredfor
PreliminaryandFinalPlats;andshallincludetheadditional
informationrequirementslistedinSection2.4(P)(9)(c)(iii)belowto
beconsideredcomplete(exceptasexemptedbytheCommunity
DevelopmentDepartment).
4.IfthePUDisproposedtodevelopoveratimeframeexceedingtwo
years,aPUDPhasingPlanfortheentireproject(tobecompletedin
phases)maybesubmitted.SubsequentPUDFinalPlanapplications
wouldonlygrantapprovalforanindividualphase.
(iii)SpecificPUDDevelopmentStage,PreliminaryPlatandRezoning
SubmittalRequirements
AnapplicantshallprovideaseparatePUDDevelopmentStagePlan
clearlydelineatingtheproposeddevelopmentandallfeaturesnot
consistentwithunderlyingzoningregulations(e.g.setbackdeviations).
Ataminimum,theplanshouldshow:
1.AllrequiredinformationperSection2.4(P)(9)(b)(iii)ofthis
ordinance.
2.Administrativeinformation(includingidentificationofthedrawingas
a“PUDDevelopmentStagePlan,”theproposednameoftheproject,
contactinformationforthedeveloperandindividualpreparingthe
plan,signatureofthesurveyorandcivilengineercertifyingthe
document,dateofplanpreparationorrevision,andagraphicscale
andtruenortharrow);
3.Areacalculationsforgrosslandarea,wetlandareas,wetlandbuffers,
right-of-waydedications,conservationareas,andproposedpublicand
privateparks;
4.Existingzoningdistrict(s);
5.Layoutofproposedlotswithfuturelotandblocknumbers.The
perimeterboundarylineofthesubdivisionshouldbedistinguishable
fromtheotherpropertylines.Denoteoutlotsplannedforpublic
dedicationand/oropenspace(schools,parks,etc.);
6.Areacalculationsforeachparcel;
7.Proposedsetbacksoneachlot(formingthebuildingpad)and
calculatedbuildablearea;
8.Proposedgrosshardcoverallowanceperlot(ifapplicable);
Page8 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
9.Existingcontoursatintervalsoftwofeet.Contoursmustextenda
minimumof200feetbeyondtheboundaryoftheparcel(s)in
question;
10.Delineationofwetlandsand/orwatercoursesoverthepropertyand
within200feetoftheperimeterofthesubdivisionparcel;
11.Delineationoftheordinaryhighwaterlevelsofallwaterbodies;
12.Gradingdrainageanderosioncontrolplanpreparedbyaregistered
professionalengineer,providingallinformationoutlinedin
MonticelloZoningCode,Chapter4,Section10(C);
13.Location,width,andnamesofexistingandproposedstreetswithin
andimmediatelyadjacenttothesubdivisionparcel;
14.Easementsandrights-of-waywithinoradjacenttothesubdivision
parcel(s);
15.Thelocationandorientationofproposedbuildings;
16.Coloredbuildingelevationswhichdetailthematerialsbeingused;
17.Proposedsidewalksandtrails;
18.Vehicularcirculationsystemshowinglocationanddimensionforall
driveways,parkingspaces,parkinglotaisles,serviceroads,loading
areas,firelanes,emergencyaccess,ifnecessary,publicandprivate
streets,alleys,sidewalks,bikepaths,directionoftrafficflowand
trafficcontroldevices;
19.Lightinglocation,styleandmountingandlightdistributionplan.
20.Proposedparks,commonareas,andpreservationeasements(indicate
publicvs.privateifapplicable);
21.Landscapeplanpreparedbyaqualifiedprofessionalprovidingall
informationoutlinedinMonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection4.1(D)
includingplantingcounts,sizesandspecies;
22.Locationanddetailofsignageprovidingallpertinentinformation
outlinedinMonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection2.4(K)(3)(b).
23.Location,accessandscreeningdetailoflargetrashhandlingand
recyclingcollectionareasincompliancewiththerequirementsof
MonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection5.3(D)(30).
24.AnyotherinformationasdirectedbytheCommunityDevelopment
Department.
(iv)PUDDevelopmentStage,PreliminaryPlatandRezoningtoPUD
Review
1.TheapplicationforrezoningtoPUDshallbereviewedinaccordance
withSection2.4(B),ZoningOrdinanceTextandZoningMap
Amendments.
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page9
2.TheapplicationforPreliminaryPlatshallbereviewedinaccordance
withCityCodeTitle11,Chapter3,Section2,PreliminaryPlat
Procedure.
3.Aspartofthereviewprocessforbothapplications,theCommunity
DevelopmentDepartmentshallgenerateananalysisoftheproposal
againsttheexpectationsforPUDsandthisordinancetoformulatea
recommendationregardingtherezoningtothePlanningCommission
andCityCouncil.
4.ThePlanningCommissionshallholdapublichearingandconsider
theapplication’sconsistencywiththeintentandpurposeofthePUD
andcomprehensiveplangoals.ThePlanningCommissionshallmake
recommendationstotheCityCouncilonthemerit,neededchanges,
andsuggestedconditionsoftheproposedrezoning,preliminaryplat
andPUDdevelopmentplan.
5.InapprovingordenyingthePUDDevelopmentStageapplicationand
ordinancetorezonethesubjectpropertytoPUD,theCityCouncil
shallmakefindingsonthefollowing:
a.WhetherthePUDplanisconsistentwiththecity’s
comprehensiveplan;
b.WhetherthePUDplanistailoredtothespecificcharacteristicsof
thesiteandachievesahigherqualityofsiteplanningandgreater
publicbenefitsthanwouldbeachievedunderconventional
provisionsoftheordinance;
c.WhetherthethePUDplanaddressesthepurposeandintentofthe
PUDrezoninglaidoutinSection2.4(P)(1),andthepublicvalues
statementestablishedatthebeginningoftheprocess;
d.WhetherthePUDplanaddressestheexpectationsofaPUDlaid
outinSection2.4(P)(7);
e.WhetherthePUDplanmaintainsorimprovestheefficiencyof
publicstreets,utilities,andotherpublicservices;
f.WhetherthePUDplanresultsindevelopmentcompatiblewith
existingadjacentandfutureguidedlanduses;
g.WhetherthePUDcanbeaccommodatedbyexistingpublic
services,suchasparks,police,fire,administration,andutilities,
orthedeveloperhasprovidedforthegrowthandextensionof
suchservicesasacomponentofthePUD.
h.WhetherthePUDisdesignedtotakeadvantageof,andpreserve,
thenaturalfeaturesofthesubjectproperty,includingwaterways,
forestedareas,naturalprairie,topography,views,etc.
Page10 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
6.AnordinancerezoningthepropertyshallbepreparedbytheCity,for
reviewattheDevelopmentStagePUD,butadoptionofsuch
ordinanceshalloccuronlyuponapprovaloftheFinalStagePUD.
(c)PUDFinalStageandFinalPlat
(i)InitiationofProceedings
1.AFinalStagePUDplanandfinalplatthatconformswiththe
approvedDevelopmentStagePUDandpreliminaryplatand
associatedPUDrezoningordinanceshallbesubmittedandreviewed
withinthetimeallottedbyMinn.Stat.Section15.99.
2.TherequestforPUDFinalStageandFinalPlatshallbeinitiatedby
applicationofthepropertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthorityto
fileanapplicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFile
Applications.
(ii)Application
1.AllapplicationsforPUDFinalStageandFinalPlatshallbein
accordancewithSection2.3,CommonReviewRequirements.
2.TheapplicationforPUDFinalPlatshallbeinaccordancewithCity
CodeTitle11,Chapter4,DataRequiredforPreliminaryandFinal
Plats.
3.Inadditiontogeneralcitycoderequirements,applicationsforaPUD
FinalStageandFinalPlatshallalsoincludeatleasttheinformationin
Section2.4(P)(9)(d)(iii)belowtobeconsideredcomplete(exceptas
exemptedbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment).
(iii)SpecificPUD FinalStageandFinalPlatSubmittalRequirements
1.IfaPUDMasterPlanfortheentireprojectwassubmittedand
approvedaspartofthePUDDevelopmentStage,anupdatedMaster
Planshallbesubmittedincorporatingallchangesrequiredbythe
PUDDevelopmentStageapproval.
2.ThePUDDevelopmentStagePlanshallbeupdatedtoincorporateall
changesrequiredbythePUD,preliminaryplatandrezoning
approvals.Thisdocumentmustclearlyshowalldeviationsfrom
standardzoningbeingapprovedaspartofthePUD.
3.TheCityshallprepare,andtheapplicantshallexecute,adeveloper’s
agreementwhichreferencesallPUDplans,developmentphasing,
requiredimprovements,completiondatesforimprovements,the
requiredletterofcredit,allrequireddevelopmentfees,escrows,and
warranties,andanyotherinformationdeemednecessarybytheCity.
4.TheCityshall,uponapprovalofthePUDFinalStage,recordingof
theFinalPlat,andexecutionofthePUDdeveloper’sagreement,,
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page11
publishthePUDOrdinancespecifyinglanduse,densities,
performancestandards,andongoinggeneralobligationsofoccupants
ofthePUD.Suchordinanceshallcreateazoningdistrictthatis
specifictothepropertyforwhichthePUDwasapplied,andshallbe
designatedinsuchawayastobeabletomarktheofficialzoningmap
toidentifythePUDordinance.ThePUDordinanceshallalso
designatethatsuchpropertyistherebyrezonedtothePUDdistrictas
adopted.
5.Up-to-datetitleevidenceforthesubjectpropertyinaformacceptable
totheCityshallbeprovidedaspartoftheapplicationforthePUD
FinalPlat.
6.DevelopershallprovidewarrantydeedsforPropertybeingdedicated
totheCityforallparks,outlots,etc.,freefromallliensand
encumbrancesexceptasotherwisewaivedbytheCityCouncil.
7.Developershallprovidealleasementdedicationdocumentsfor
easementsnotshownonthefinalplatincludingthosefortrails,
ingress/egress,etc.,togetherwithallnecessaryconsentstothe
easementbyexistingencumbrancesoftheproperty.
(iv)PUDFinalStageandFinalPlatReview
TheapplicationforPUDFinalStageandFinalPlatshallbeconsideredby
theCityCouncilatapublicmeeting,followingareviewandreportbythe
CommunityDevelopmentDepartment.ApprovalofthePUDFinal
StageandFinalPlatshallbebysimplemajorityvoteoftheCityCouncil,
exceptwhereStatelawmayspecificallyrequireasupermajority..
(10)PUDAmendments
ApprovedPUD’smaybeamendedfromtimetotimeasaresultofunforeseen
circumstances,overlookedopportunities,orrequestsfromadeveloper.Atsucha
time,theapplicantshallmakeanapplicationtothecityforaPUDamendment.
Allsuchamendmentswillbeprocessedasoneofthefollowing:
(a)AdministrativeAmendment–TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentmay
approveminorchangesinthelocation,placement,andheightofbuildingsif
suchchangesarerequiredbyengineeringorothercircumstances,providedthe
conformtothereviewcriteriaappliedbythePlanningCommissionandCity
Council,andareconsistentwithallrequirementsofthePUDordinance.
Undernocircumstancesshallanadministrativeamendmentallowadditional
storiestobuildings,additionallots,orchangestodesignatedusesestablished
aspartofthePUD.AnAdministrativeAmendmentshallbememorializedvia
lettersignedbytheCommunityDevelopmentDirectorandrecordedagainst
thePUDproperty.
Page12 CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance
(b)PUDAdjustment–anadjustmenttoaPUDmaybemadethroughreviewand
approvalbyasimplemajorityvoteoftheCityCouncilwithorwithout
referraltothePlanningCommission.ForaPUDAdjustment,theapplicant
shallfollowtheproceduresandrequirementsofthePUDFinalStageas
identifiedinthisChapter.APUDAdjustmentshallbememorializedwithan
amendmenttothePUDDevelopmentAgreement,executedbytheCityand
applicant,andrecordedagainstthePUDproperty.Toqualifyforthisreview,
theminoradjustmentshallnot:
(i)Eliminate,diminishorbedisruptivetothepreservationandprotectionof
sensitivesitefeatures.
(ii)Eliminate,diminishorcompromisethehighqualityofsiteplanning,
design,landscapingorbuildingmaterials.
(iii)Altersignificantlythelocationofbuildings,parkingareasorroads.
(iv)Increaseordecreasethenumberofresidentialdwellingunitsbymore
thanfivepercent.
(v)Increasethegrossfloorareaofnon-residentialbuildingsbymorethan
threepercentorincreasethegrossfloorareaofanyindividualbuildingby
morethanfivepercent(residentiallotsnotguidedforspecificstructure
sizesareexcludedfromthisrequirement).
(vi)Increasethenumberofstoriesofanybuilding.
(vii)Decreasetheamountofopenspaceoralteritinsuchawayastochange
itsoriginaldesignorintendedfunctionoruse.
(viii)Createnon-compliancewithanyconditionattachedtotheapprovalofthe
FinalPUDPlan.
(c)PUDAmendment–anychangenotqualifyingforanadministrative
amendmentoraPUDadjustmentshallrequireaPUDamendment.An
applicationtoamendaPUDshallbeadministeredinthesamemannerasthat
requiredforaninitialPUDbeginningatPUDDevelopmentStageand
PreliminaryPlat.
(11)PUDCancellation
APUDshallonlybecancelledandrevokedupontheCityCounciladoptingan
ordinancerescindingtheordinanceapprovingthePUD.CancellationofaPUD
shallincludefindingsthatdemonstratethatthePUDisinconsistentwiththe
ComprehensivePlanorotherapplicationlanduseregulations,threatenspublic
safety,health,orwelfare,orotherapplicablefindingsinaccordancewithlaw.
(12)Administration
Ingeneral,thefollowingrulesshallapplytoallPUDs:
CityofMonticelloZoningOrdinance Page13
(a)Rulesandregulations:NorequirementoutlinedinthePUDprocessshall
restricttheCityCouncilfromtakingactiononanapplicationifnecessaryto
meetstatemandatedtimedeadlines;
(b)Preconstruction:Nobuildingpermitshallbegrantedforanybuildingonland
forwhichaPUDplanisintheprocessofreview,unlesstheproposed
buildingisallowedundertheexistingzoningandwillnotimpact,influence,
orinterferewiththeproposedPUDplan.
(c)EffectonConveyedProperty.Intheeventanyrealpropertyintheapproved
PUDAgreementisconveyedintotal,orinpart,thebuyersthereofshallbe
boundbytheprovisionsoftheapprovedFinalPUDPlanconstitutingapart
thereofaswellasthePUDzoningordinance;provided,however,thatnothing
hereinshallbeconstruedtocreatenon-conforminglots,buildingsites,
buildingsorusesbyvirtueofanysuchconveyanceofalot,buildingsite,
buildingorpartofthedevelopmentcreatedpursuanttoandinconformance
withtheapprovedPUD.
CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES
Section 2.3 Common Review Procedures & Requirements
Subsection (I) Public Notification
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 17
(3) Responsibilities
(a) Published notice
When the provisions of this ordinance require that notice be published, the
Community Development Department shall be responsible for preparing the
content of the notice and publishing the notice in the City’s official
newspaper. The content and form of the published notice shall be consistent
with the requirements of Section 2.3(I)(1) and state law.
(b) Written (mailed) notice.
When the provisions of this ordinance require that written or mailed notice be
provided, the Community Development Department shall be responsible for
preparing and mailing the written notice per the requirements outlined in
Table 2-2.
TABLE 2-2: WRITTEN NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
Application Type: Written Notice Provided to:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment All property owners within 350 feet
Zoning Map Amendment All property owners within 350 feet
Variance All property owners within 350 feet
Conditional Use Permit All property owners within 350 feet
Interim Use Permit (new and renewal) All property owners within 350 feet
CUP/IUP Revocation Permittee/Landowner Only
Planned Unit Developments All property owners within 500 feet
(4) Notice Construction
(a) The Community Development Department may use property tax records to
determine the names and addresses of affected property owners. A copy of
the notice and a list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent
must be attested to by the Community Development Department and must be
made a part of the records of the proceedings.
(b) Minor defects in any notice shall not impair the notice or invalidate
proceedings pursuant to the notice if a good faith attempt has been made to
comply with applicable notice requirements. Minor defects in notice are
errors that do not affect the substance of the notice (e.g., errors in a legal
description, typographical or grammatical errors, errors of actual acreage,
etc). Failure of a party to receive written notice shall not invalidate
subsequent action. In all cases, however, the notification requirements and
information specifying the time, date, and place of a hearing shall be strictly
construed.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
1
7C.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2014-056approvingaPUDadjustmentfor
theSwanRiverPUDandamendmenttoDevelopmentContractfortheSwanRiver
PUD.Applicant.Miller,Eric/SRCSBuildingCompany,o/b/oSwanRiver
Montessori (AS/SB)
A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND:
SRCSBuildingCompanyisrequestingthattheCityCouncilapproveaPUDAdjustment
totheSwanRiverPUDforproposedchangestotheprojectsiteplanasfollows.
1.Eliminationoftheparking“bump-out”onthewestsideofMapleStreetandremoval
ofcorrespondingloading/parkingsignageinthisbump-out.Asthecrosswalkhas
beenmovedtoMapleand5½StreetsasaconditionoftheFinalStagePUDapproval,
theapplicantbelievesthisbump-outisnowunnecessary.Therefore,aspartofthe
PUDadjustment,theapplicantisrequestingthatCouncilapprovethebump-out
removalasachangetotheapprovedsiteplanandthatthefollowingsignage
requirementsalsobeeliminated:
a.Signageisaddedtonoteloading/unloadingonlyintheexisting“bump-in”
aisleeastofMaple.
b.Signageisaddedtolimitparkingintheproposed“bump-in”westofMaple
foramaximumof15minutes.
ThedevelopmentcontractforthePUD,whichhasnotyetbeenexecuted,willbe
amendedtoreflectchangesapprovedbytheCityCouncilaspartoftheadjustment.
AllotherconditionsofapprovalfortheoriginalPUDapprovalwillstillberequiredand
areprovidedintheattachedExhibitZ.Condition1isreflectiveoftheproposedPUD
adjustmentrequest.Statusofcompliancewithapprovedconditionsisalsonoted.
1.Theapplicantsprovidearevisedsiteplanillustratingremovalofthecurbbump-
outsalongMapleStreetandcorrespondingsignage.
2.Removenativelandscapingfromfrontlineofbuildingtostreetinfavoroftraditional
turfplanting.Arevisedlandscapingplanaddressingthisconditionisrequired.
3.Theadditionofdormersordecorativefeatures(e.g.cupolasandskylight,etc.)tothe
roofofthenewschoolbuildingtoaddinteresttotheupperportionofthebuilding.
Increasepitchofroof,ormirrorfeaturesfromexistingbuilding.Theapplicantshave
addedcupolafeaturestotheroofline,withglassandlighting,consistentwiththe
condition.FinalStagePUDapprovalconditionsrequiredthatthepitchoftheroof
overtheentrybeincreasedtomirrorthepitchontheexistingschoolbuilding
façade.Afinalplanreflectingcomplianceofthisconditionandfinaldesignof
cupolaswillberequired.
4.TheschoolshouldconsiderhowthePUDdesignmightcatertobicycleorpedestrian
accessfromatrailtothenorth(alongtherailROW),andgiventheaccessibilityof
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
2
bicyclestothesite,howbicycleparkingfacilitiescanbeprovided.Thesitehas
accesstoapublicsidewalk,whichconnectstoapathwaynorthoftheadjacent
railroad.Inaddition,acrosswalkisbeingproposedacrossMapleStreetwhich
wouldprovidepedestrianaccessfromthesitetotheCommunityCenter.Student
arrivals(whetherbicycle,pedestrian,orautomobile)willcontinuetobehandledat
theexistingbuilding.
5.Proposeddogwoodshrubsshouldbecoupledwithadditionalshrubsorsmalltrees
throughoutthePUDsite.Alongtherailroadadditionalshrubs/smalltreesshouldbe
usedtocreateamoreopaquescreeningaffect,andalongthesouthandwestproperty
linesadditionalshrubs/smalltreesshouldbeaddedtocreateamorecontinuousbuffer
throughwintermonths.Recommendedspeciesincludeviburnums,ninebarks,
Americanelder,tallAmericanarborvitaevarieties(orotherevergreensadaptedtothe
region),etc.Theapplicantshaverevisedthelandscapeplantoaccommodatethis
condition.
6.Theapplicantsshouldconsiderimplementingadditionalareasofshrubsorsmalltrees
inassociationwithwoodland/shadetolerantseedmixesalongnorthandeastportions
ofthesite.Therearenumerouslowmaintenancenativeornon-nativecultivarsthat
canservethesefunctions(e.g.compactviburnumspecies,ninebarks,dwarfbush
honeysuckles,chokeberries,whitecedars,serviceberriesorothersmallfruitingtrees,
fragrantsumac,etc.).Theapplicantshaverevisedthelandscapeplanto
accommodatethiscondition.
7.TheapplicantshalladheretotreeprotectionsstandardsprovidedinChapter4Section
4.2oftheZoningOrdinance(notreeprotectioncurrentlyprovided).Treeprotection
isaconditionappliedduringtheconstructionandgradingprocess.Replacement
oftreesrequiredbytheordinanceismetwiththeproposedplan.
8.Provideamaintenanceplanforofseedmixes&shrub/treeplantings(removalof
invasivesorweeds,andreplacementofanydeadspecimens).Thisconditionhasnot
yetbeenmet.Amaintenanceplanisnecessarytoensurethatthenativelandscape
willproperlythrive,andthatannualmaintenance(whichcanincludemowingor
burning)isaddressedinanappropriatewaythatisacceptabletotheCity,including
thefiredepartmentifapplicable.
9.Theapplicantsshallprovidealightingplanforreview,andaddressanydeviation
fromstandards.Theplanhasbeensubmitted,showinglightingmeetingtheCity’s
requirements(lightedareasonlyundertheentrycanopyanddecorativelightingin
theglasscupolas).
10.Theapplicantsshallprovideasignageplan(ifany),andshouldaddressanydeviation
fromstandards.Asignplanshowingasmallwallidentificationsignmeetingthe
City’sstandardsisincludedwiththecurrentplanset.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
3
11.Implementationof(coloredstamped)perviouspaversinthelandscapingdesign,as
opposedtoaplainconcretewalk.Theapplicantshaveindicatedtheiragreement
withthecondition,andwillneedtomarkthefinalplansetwithanotation
reflectingthisdesignrequirement.
12.Theproposedgrading,drainage,anderosioncontrolmeasuresaresubjecttoreview
andapprovalbytheCityEngineer.Theapplicantsarerequiredtoadheretoany
recommendationsfromtheCityEngineerasaconditionofPUDapproval.The
applicantshavebeenworkingwiththeengineeronmeetingtheserequirements.
13.Theapplicantswillberesponsibleforinstallationofpedestriancrossing
improvementsforthecrosswalkatMapleand5½St,includingsignage,asapproved
bytheCityCouncilaspartofthefinalstagePUDadjustmenton5/27/14.
a.Cross-walksshallbemarkedwithground-inpolypre-formmarkings.
b.Crosswalkshallbemarkedwithablinkingpush-buttonsignvisibletoboth
directionsofMapleStreettrafficandadvancedcrosswalksignageisplaced
thatmeetstherequirementsoftheCityEngineer.
c.Alternate:Crosswalkshallbemarkedwithstandardpedestriansign
meetingCityspecificationvisibletobothdirectionsofMapleStreet.
14.Providedetailsoftheproposedgazebo,includingmaterialsanddimensions.Upon
installation,accessorystructuresmaynotexceed15feet.Thisconditionhasbeen
met.
15.CompleteandsubmitFinalStagePUDdocumentsconsistentwiththerequired
conditionsofapprovalforinclusioninthefinalPUDordinanceanddevelopment
contract.Theplans,withmodificationsnotedherein,wouldsatisfythiscondition.
16.Executionofadevelopmentcontractsecuringtherequiredimprovements.A
developmentcontractdrafthasbeenpreparedandwillberequiredasapartofthe
rezoningapproval.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2014-056approvingthePUDadjustmentand
amendmenttoDevelopmentContractfortheSwanRiverPUDtoremovethe
proposedbumpoutforMapleStreetandcorrespondingloading/parkingsignage.
2.MotiontonotadoptResolution#2014-056foraPUDadjustmentfortheSwan
RiverPUDandamendmenttoDevelopmentContract.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsAlternative#1.
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
4
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.Resolution#2014-056
B.SitePlan
C.DevelopmentContract
CITYOFMONTICELLO
WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIONNO.2014-056
APPROVINGAFINALSTAGEPLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENTADJUSTMENT
FORSWANRIVERANDAMENDMENTTODEVELOPMENTCONTRACTFOR
SWANRIVERCHARTERSCHOOLPLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS,theCityofMonticellohasadoptedazoningordinanceprovidingforthe
regulationofplannedunitdevelopment;and
WHEREAS,theapplicanthasrequestedanadjustmenttoplannedunitdevelopmenttoallowfor
removaloftheproposedstreetparkingbump-outforMapleStreetandcorresponding
loading/parkingsignage,and
WHEREAS,theCityCounciloftheCityofMonticellofindsthattheadjustmenttoPUDis
consistentwiththeCity’sgoalsforplannedunitdevelopmentgoalsfortheSwanRiver
CharterSchool;
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCityCounciloftheCityof
Monticello,MinnesotaherebyapprovestheadjustmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopmentfor
SunsetPonds,subjecttothefollowingconditions:
1.Theapplicantsprovidearevisedsiteplanillustratingremovalofthecurbbump-outs
alongMapleStreetandcorrespondingsignage.
2.AllotherpreviouslyassignedandapprovedconditionsfortheSwanRiverCharterSchool
shallapply.
3.Theapplicantenterintoadevelopmentcontractfortheplannedunitdevelopment,which
shallreflecttheapprovedPUDAdjustment.
ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncil this27th dayofMay,2014.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
123767 1
(reservedforrecordinginformation)
PLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENT
ANDDEVELOPMENTCONTRACT
SWANRIVERCHARTERSCHOOL
AGREEMENT dated____________________,2014,byandbetweenthe CITYOFMONTICELLO,a
Minnesotamunicipalcorporation(“City”),and SRCSBUILDINGCOMPANY,aMinnesota
______________________(the“Developer”).
1.REQUESTFORPLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENTAPPROVAL.OnApril28th,2014,the
CityapprovedOrdinance#592,approvingaPlannedUnitDevelopmentfor SWANRIVERCHARTERSCHOOL
(referredtointhisContractasthe“Development”).OnMay27th,theCityCouncilapprovedaPUDAdjustmentfor
SWANRIVERCHARTERSCHOOL.ThelandissituatedintheCountyofWright,StateofMinnesota,andislegally
describedinExhibit“A”,attachedhereto.
2.CONDITIONSOFAPPROVAL.TheCityapprovedtheOrdinanceforPlannedUnitDevelopment
for SWANRIVERCHARTERSCHOOLandthesubsequentPUDAdjustment basedontheconditionsthat:
a)Theapplicantsprovidearevisedsiteplanillustratingremovalofthecurbbump-outalong
MapleStreetandcorrespondingsignage.
b)Removenativelandscapingfromfrontlineofbuildingforwardtostreetinfavoroftraditional
turfplanting.
c)Thepitchoftheroofoverthenewentryshouldbeincreasedtomirrorthepitchontheexistingschool
buildingfaçade.
d)TheapplicantshalladheretotreeprotectionsstandardsprovidedinChapter4Section4.2oftheZoning
Ordinance(notreeprotectioncurrentlyprovided).
e)Theapplicantprovideamaintenanceplanforofseedmixes&shrub/treeplantings(removalof
invasivesorweeds,andreplacementofanydeadspecimens).
123767 2
f)Theapplicantswillneedtomarkthefinalplansetwithanotationreflectingthisdesignrequirement.
g)Implementationof(coloredstamped)perviouspaversinthelandscapingdesign,asopposedto
aplainconcretewalk.
h)Theproposedgrading,drainage,anderosioncontrolmeasuresaresubjecttoreviewandapprovalby
theCityEngineer.TheapplicantsarerequiredtoadheretoanyrecommendationsfromtheCity
EngineerasaconditionofPUDapproval.
i)Theapplicantswillberesponsibleforinstallationofpedestriancrossingimprovementsforthe
crosswalkatMapleand5½St,includingsignage,asapprovedbytheCityCouncilaspartof
thefinalstagePUDadjustmenton5/27/14.
i.Cross-walksaremarkedwithground-inpolypre-formmarkings.
ii.Crosswalkismarkedwithablinkingpush-buttonsignvisibletobothdirectionsofMaple
Streettrafficandadvancedcrosswalksignageisplacedthatmeetstherequirementsofthe
CityEngineer.
Alt:CrosswalkshallbemarkedwithstandardpedestriansignmeetingCity
specificationvisibletobothdirectionsofMapleStreet.
j)CompleteandsubmitFinalStagePUDdocumentsconsistentwiththerequiredconditionsofapproval
forinclusioninthefinalPUDordinanceanddevelopmentcontract.
k)Executionofadevelopmentcontractsecuringtherequiredimprovements.
l)Theexistingsanitarysewerserviceservingthesitemayneedtobelinedasdeterminedinthefield.The
associatedcostforliningwillbetheapplicant’sresponsibility.
m)DrainageandutilityeasementsshallbeprovidedasrequiredbytheCityEngineertoaccommodate
offsitedrainageandassociatedon-sitestormsewer.
3.RIGHTTOPROCEED.Withinthedevelopment,theDevelopermaynotgradeorotherwisedisturb
theearth,removetrees,constructsewerlines,waterlines,streets,utilities,publicorprivateimprovements,orany
buildingsuntilallthefollowingconditionshavebeensatisfied:1)thisagreementhasbeenfullyexecutedbybothparties
andfiledwiththeCityClerk,and2)thenecessarysecurityhasbeenreceivedbytheCity.
4.DEVELOPMENTPLANS.Thesiteshallbedevelopedinaccordancewiththeplanssubmittedfor
PlannedUnitDevelopmentandapprovedonApril28th,2014,exceptasmodifiedbytheapprovedconditionsnoted
herein.TheplansshallbeattachedtothisContract.
A.ExistingConditionsPlan
B.SitePlan
123767 3
C.LandscapePlan
D.ExteriorElevationsPlan
E.PreliminaryPUDPlan
F.GradingandErosionPlan
5.PHASEDDEVELOPMENT.FuturephasesofdevelopmentaresubjecttotheCity’sordinancesand
regulations,includingthosepertainingtoamendmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopment.
6.LICENSE.TheDeveloperherebygrantstheCity,itsagents,employees,officersandcontractorsa
licensetoenterthepropertytoperformallworkandinspectionsdeemedappropriatebytheCityinconjunctionwith
development.
7.EROSIONCONTROL,STORMWATERCONTROLANDSTREETCLEANUP.OnApril
28th,2014,theCityapprovedaGrading&ErosionControlPlan.Priortoinitiatingsitegrading,theerosioncontrol
planshallbeimplementedbytheDeveloperandinspectedandapprovedbytheCity.TheDevelopershallcleandirt
anddebrisfromstreetsthathasresultedfromsiteandconstructionworkintheplatbytheDeveloperoranyother
personorentity.Thepartiesrecognizethattimeisoftheessenceincontrollingerosion.IftheDeveloperdoesnot
complywiththeerosioncontrolplanandscheduleorsupplementaryinstructionsreceivedfromtheCity,orrepeatedly
failstocleanandsweepstreets,theCitymaytakesuchactionasitdeemsappropriate,includingtheperformanceof
thenecessaryworkbyCitystafforcontractingtohaveitperformed.Chargesincurredwiththeenforcementoferosion
controlaretheresponsibilityofthedeveloper.TheCitywillendeavortonotifytheDeveloperinadvanceofany
proposedaction,butfailureoftheCitytodosowillnotaffecttheDeveloper'sandCity'srightsorobligations
hereunder.Nositeandconstructionworkwillbeallowedandnobuildingpermitswillbeissuedunlessthe
developmentisinfullcompliancewiththeapprovederosioncontrolplanandstormwatercontrolmeasuresarein
place.
8.PERMITS.TheDevelopershallobtainorrequireitscontractorsandsubcontractorsto
obtainallnecessarypermits,includingbutnotlimitedto:
MinnesotaDepartmentofHealthforWatermains
NPDESPermitforStormwaterConnections
MPCAforSanitarySewerandHazardousMaterialRemovalandDisposal
DNRforDewatering
123767 4
CityofMonticelloforGradingPermits
CityofMonticelloforUtilityConnections,RightofWayandExcavationPermits
9.OWNERSHIPOFIMPROVEMENTS.Uponcompletionoftheworkandconstructionrequiredby
thisContract,theimprovementslyingwithinpubliceasementsshallbecomeCitypropertywithoutfurthernoticeor
action.Regardingthecrosswalkat5½thStreetandMapleStreet,thefollowingcontrolsshallapply.
a)Signageisaddedtonoteloading/unloadingonlyintheexisting“bump-in”aisleeastof
Maple.
b)Signageisaddedtolimitparkingintheproposed“bump-in”westofMaplefora
maximumof15minutes.
c)Cross-walksaremarkedwithground-inpolypre-formmarkings.
d)Crosswalkismarkedwithablinkingpush-buttonsignvisibletobothdirectionsof
MapleStreettrafficandadvancedcrosswalksignageisplacedthatmeetsthe
requirementsoftheCityEngineer.
10.STORMSEWERAREACHARGE.Nostormsewerareaandpondingchargesareapplicable
duetothepreviouslydevelopednatureofthesubjectparcels.
11.SANITARYSEWERAREACHARGE.Nosanitarysewerareachargesareapplicabledue
tothepreviouslydevelopednatureofthesubjectparcels.
12.WATERMAINAREA CHARGE.Nowatermainareachargesareapplicableduetothe
previouslydevelopednatureofthesubjectparcels.
13.SUMMARYOFCASHREQUIREMENTS.Thefollowingisasummaryofthecash
requirementsunderthisContractwhichhasbeenfurnishedtotheCitypriortothetimeoffinalstageplan
approval:
PlanReview/Inspection$3000.00
Concept/Development/FinalStagePUD
_______
TotalCashRequirements$3000.00
*Feesreconciledtoactualexpensesatcloseofproject.
14.SUMMARYOFSECURITYREQUIREMENTS.Toguaranteecompliancewiththe
termsofthisContract,includingtheconstructionoftheDeveloperInstalledPublicImprovements,the
123767 5
DevelopershallfurnishtheCitywithacashescroworaletterofcredit,intheformattachedhereto,froma
bank("security")for $47,500.00.Theamountofthesecurityiscalculatedasfollows:
SiteGradingandRestoration($3000/acre)$3000.00
Landscaping(equivalenttocostofimprovements)10,000.00
CrosswalkandSignageInstallation(equivalenttocostofimprovements)10,000.00
StreetandSidewalkConstruction(equivalenttocostofimprovements)15,000.00
TOTALCOSTS $38,000.00
TOTALSECURITIES:TotalCostsX125%$47,500.00
Thisbreakdownisforhistoricalreference;itisnotarestrictionontheuseofthesecurity.Thebankshallbesubjectto
theapprovaloftheCityAdministrator.Thesecurityshallbeforanautomaticallyrenewingterm.TheCitymaydraw
downthesecurity,with30dayswrittennoticetoDeveloper,foranyviolationofthetermsofthisContractorifthe
securityisallowedtolapsepriortotheendoftherequiredterm.Ifthesecurityisdrawndown,theproceedsshallbe
usedtocurethedefault.Exceptforthelandscapingsecurity,uponreceiptofproofsatisfactorytotheCitythatworkhas
beencompletedandfinancialobligationstotheCityhavebeensatisfied,withCityapprovalthesecuritymaybereduced
fromtimetotimebyninetypercent(90%)ofthefinancialobligationsthathavebeensatisfied.Tenpercent(10%)of
theamountscertifiedbytheDeveloper'sengineershallberetainedassecurityuntilallimprovementshavebeen
completed,allfinancialobligationstotheCitysatisfied,anyrequired"asconstructed"planshavebeenreceivedbythe
City.TheCitystandardspecificationsforutilitiesandstreetconstructionoutlineproceduresforsecurityreductions.The
landscapingsecurityshallberetaineduntilallimprovementsarecompletedandtreesandothervegetationhavebeen
showntosurvivefortwogrowingseasons.
15.CROSSEASEMENT.ThePlannedUnitDevelopmentissubjecttotheexistingcross-parking
conditionbetweenSwanRiverCharterSchoolandtheCityofMonticello,whichshallremainineffectwiththe
approvalofthisPlannedUnitDevelopment.
16.RESPONSIBILITYFORCOSTS.
123767 6
A.TheDeveloperhasprovidedadepositforthereviewoftheproject.TheDevelopershallpay
allactualcostsinexcessofthedepositincurredbyitortheCityinconjunctionwiththedevelopmentforCity
administration,legal,engineeringandplanningexpensesincurredinconnectionwithapprovalandacceptanceofthe
developmentandpreparationofthisContract.Allexpenseswillbebilledatprojectcompletion.
B.TheDevelopershallholdtheCityanditsofficers,employees,andagentsharmlessfromclaims
madebyitandthirdpartiesfordamagessustainedorcostsincurredresultingfromdevelopment.TheDevelopershall
indemnifytheCityanditsofficers,employees,andagentsforallcosts,damages,orexpenseswhichtheCitymaypay
orincurinconsequenceofsuchclaims,includingattorneys'fees.
C.TheDevelopershallreimbursetheCityforcostsincurredintheenforcementofthisContract,
includingengineeringandattorneys'fees.
D.TheDevelopershallpayinfullallbillssubmittedtoitbytheCityforobligationsincurred
underthisContractwithinthirty(30)daysafterreceipt.Ifthebillsarenotpaidontime,theCitymayhaltdevelopment
andconstructionuntilthebillsarepaidinfull.Billsnotpaidwithinthirty(30)daysshallaccrueinterestattherateof
eighteenpercent(18%)peryear.
E.Inadditiontothechargesreferredtoherein,otherchargesandspecialassessmentsmaybe
imposedsuchasbutnotlimitedtoseweravailabilitycharges("SAC"),Citywaterconnectioncharges,Citysewer
connectioncharges,andbuildingpermitfees.
17.DEVELOPER’SDEFAULT.IntheeventofdefaultbytheDeveloperastoanyoftheworktobe
performedbyithereunder,theCitymay,atitsoption,performtheworkandtheDevelopershallpromptlyreimburse
theCityforanyexpenseincurredbytheCity,providedtheDeveloper,exceptinanemergencyasdeterminedbythe
City,isfirstgivennoticeoftheworkindefault,notlessthanforty-eight(48)hoursinadvance.ThisContractisa
licensefortheCitytoact,anditshallnotbenecessaryfortheCitytoseekaCourtorderforpermissiontoentertheland.
WhentheCitydoesanysuchwork,theCitymay,inadditiontoitsotherremedies,assessthecostinwholeorinpart.
18.MISCELLANEOUS.
A.TheDeveloperrepresentstotheCitythatthedevelopmentcomplieswithallcity,county,
metropolitan,state,andfederallawsandregulations,includingbutnotlimitedto:subdivisionordinances,zoning
123767 7
ordinances,andenvironmentalregulations.Iftheplatceasestocomplywithcounty,metropolitan,state,andfederal
lawsandregulations,theCitymay,atitsoption,refusetoallowconstructionordevelopmentworkuntiltheDeveloper
doescomply.UpontheCity'sdemand,theDevelopershallceaseworkuntilthereiscompliance.
B.ThirdpartiesshallhavenorecourseagainsttheCityunderthisContract.
C.BreachofthetermsofthisContractbytheDevelopershallbegroundsfordenialofbuilding
permits,includinglotssoldtothirdparties.
D.Ifanyportion,section,subsection,sentence,clause,paragraph,orphraseofthisContractisfor
anyreasonheldinvalid,suchdecisionshallnotaffectthevalidityoftheremainingportionofthisContract.
E.TheactionorinactionoftheCityshallnotconstituteawaiveroramendmenttotheprovisions
ofthisContract.Tobebinding,amendmentsorwaiversshallbeinwriting,signedbythepartiesandapprovedby
writtenresolutionoftheCityCouncil.TheCity'sfailuretopromptlytakelegalactiontoenforcethisContractshallnot
beawaiverorrelease.
F.ThisContractshallrunwiththelandandmayberecordedagainstthetitletotheproperty.The
DevelopercovenantswiththeCity,itssuccessorsandassigns,thattheDeveloperiswellseizedinfeetitleoftheproperty
beingdevelopedand/orhasobtainedconsentstothisContract,intheformattachedhereto,fromallpartieswhohavean
interestintheproperty;thattherearenounrecordedinterestsinthepropertybeingfinalplatted;andthattheDeveloper
willindemnifyandholdtheCityharmlessforanybreachoftheforegoingcovenants.
G.Developershalltakeoutandmaintainorcausetobetakenoutandmaintaineduntilsix(6)
monthsaftertheCityhasacceptedthepublicimprovements,publicliabilityandpropertydamageinsurancecovering
personalinjury,includingdeath,andclaimsforpropertydamagewhichmayariseoutofDeveloper'sworkorthework
ofitssubcontractorsorbyonedirectlyorindirectlyemployedbyanyofthem.Limitsforbodilyinjuryanddeathshall
benotlessthan$500,000.00foronepersonand$1,000,000.00foreachoccurrence;limitsforpropertydamageshallbe
notlessthan$200,000.00foreachoccurrence;oracombinationsinglelimitpolicyof$1,000,000.00ormore.TheCity
shallbenamedasanadditionalinsuredonthepolicy,andtheDevelopershallfilewiththeCityacertificateevidencing
coveragepriortotheCitysigningtheplat.ThecertificateshallprovidethattheCitymustbegiventen(10)daysadvance
writtennoticeofthecancellationoftheinsurance.
123767 8
H.Eachright,powerorremedyhereinconferredupontheCityiscumulativeandinadditionto
everyotherright,powerorremedy,expressorimplied,noworhereafterarising,availabletoCity,atlaworinequity,
orunderanyotheragreement,andeachandeveryright,powerandremedyhereinsetforthorotherwisesoexistingmay
beexercisedfromtimetotimeasoftenandinsuchorderasmaybedeemedexpedientbytheCityandshallnotbea
waiveroftherighttoexerciseatanytimethereafteranyotherright,powerorremedy.
I.TheDevelopermaynotassignthisContractwithoutthewrittenpermissionoftheCity.The
Developer'sobligationhereundershallcontinueinfullforceandeffecteveniftheDevelopersellsapartorpartsofthe
plattedland.
19.NOTICES.RequirednoticestotheDevelopershallbeinwriting,andshallbeeitherhanddelivered
totheDeveloper,itsemployeesoragents,ormailedtotheDeveloperbycertifiedmailatthefollowingaddress:
__________________________________________________________________.NoticestotheCityshallbein
writingandshallbeeitherhanddeliveredtotheCityAdministrator,ormailedtotheCitybycertifiedmailincareofthe
CityAdministratoratthefollowingaddress:MonticelloCityHall,505WalnutStreet,Monticello,Minnesota55362.
CITYOFMONTICELLO
BY:___________________________________________
ClintHerbst,Mayor
(SEAL)
AND__________________________________________
JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOFWRIGHT)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis________dayof______________,2006,by
ClintHerbstandbyJeffO’Neill,theMayorandCityAdministratoroftheCityofMonticello,aMinnesotamunicipal
corporation,onbehalfofthecorporationandpursuanttotheauthoritygrantedbyitsCityCouncil.
______________________________________________
NOTARYPUBLIC
123767 9
DEVELOPER:
SWANRIVERBUILDINGCOMPANY
BY:______________________________________
Its:
123767 10
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
(ss.
COUNTYOFWRIGHT)
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis________dayof______________,2006,by
__________________________________the___________________of________________________
___________________________,aMinnesota_______________,onitsbehalf.
______________________________________________
NOTARYPUBLIC
DRAFTEDBY:
CAMPBELL,KNUTSON
ProfessionalAssociation
317EagandaleOfficeCenter
1380CorporateCenterCurve
Eagan,MN55121
Telephone:651-452-5000
TMS
123767 11
IRREVOCABLELETTEROFCREDIT
No.___________________
Date:_________________
TO:CityofMonticello
505WalnutStreet
Monticello,Minnesota55362
DearSirorMadam:
Weherebyissue,fortheaccountof(NameofDeveloper)andinyourfavor,ourIrrevocableLetterof
Creditintheamountof$____________,availabletoyoubyyourdraftdrawnonsightontheundersignedbank.
Thedraftmust:
a)Beartheclause,"DrawnunderLetterofCreditNo.__________,dated________________,2_____,
of(NameofBank)";
b)BesignedbytheMayororCityAdministratoroftheCityofMonticello.
c)Bepresentedforpaymentat(AddressofBank),onorbefore4:00p.m.onNovember30,2015.
ThisLetterofCreditshallautomaticallyrenewforsuccessiveone-yeartermsunless,atleastforty-five(45)
dayspriortothenextannualrenewaldate(whichshallbeNovember30ofeachyear),theBankdeliverswrittennotice
totheMonticelloCityAdministratorthatitintendstomodifythetermsof,orcancel,thisLetterofCredit.Writtennotice
iseffectiveifsentbycertifiedmail,postageprepaid,anddepositedintheU.S.Mail,atleastforty-five(45)daysprior
tothenextannualrenewaldateaddressedasfollows:MonticelloCityAdministrator,MonticelloCityHall,505Walnut
Street,Monticello,MN55362,andisactuallyreceivedbytheCityAdministratoratleastthirty(30)dayspriortothe
renewaldate.
ThisLetterofCreditsetsforthinfullourunderstandingwhichshallnotinanywaybemodified,amended,
amplified,orlimitedbyreferencetoanydocument,instrument,oragreement,whetherornotreferredtoherein.
ThisLetterofCreditisnotassignable.ThisisnotaNotationLetterofCredit.Morethanonedrawmaybemade
underthisLetterofCredit.
ThisLetterofCreditshallbegovernedbythemostrecentrevisionoftheUniformCustomsandPracticefor
DocumentaryCredits,InternationalChamberofCommercePublicationNo.500.
WeherebyagreethatadraftdrawnunderandincompliancewiththisLetterofCreditshallbedulyhonored
uponpresentation.
BY:____________________________________
Its______________________________
123767 12
CERTIFICATEOFINSURANCE
PROJECT:
CERTIFICATEHOLDER:CityofMonticello
505WalnutStreet
Monticello,Minnesota55362
INSURED:
ADDITIONALINSURED:CityofMonticello
AGENT:
WORKERS'COMPENSATION:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
COVERAGE-Workers'Compensation,Statutory.
GENERALLIABILITY:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
()ClaimsMade ()Occurrence
LIMITS:[Minimum]
BodilyInjuryandDeath:
$500,000foroneperson$1,000,000foreachoccurrence
PropertyDamage:
$200,000foreachoccurrence
-OR-
CombinationSingleLimitPolicy$1,000,000ormore
123767 13
COVERAGEPROVIDED:
OperationsofContractor:YES
OperationsofSub-Contractor(Contingent):YES
DoesPersonalInjuryIncludeClaimsRelatedtoEmployment?YES
CompletedOperations/Products:YES
ContractualLiability(BroadForm):YES
GovernmentalImmunityisWaived:YES
PropertyDamageLiabilityIncludes:
DamageDuetoBlastingYES
DamageDuetoCollapseYES
DamageDuetoUndergroundFacilitiesYES
BroadFormPropertyDamageYES
AUTOMOBILELIABILITY:
PolicyNo.__________________
EffectiveDate:______________ExpirationDate:_____________
InsuranceCompany:
(X)AnyAuto
LIMITS:[Minimum]
BodilyInjury:
$500,000eachperson$1,000,000eachoccurrence
PropertyDamage:
$500,000eachoccurrence
-OR-
CombinedSingleLimitPolicy:$1,000,000eachoccurrence
AREANYDEDUCTIBLESAPPLICABLETOBODILYINJURYORPROPERTYDAMAGEONANYOF
THEABOVECOVERAGES:
Ifso,list:Amount:$________________
[Nottoexceed$1,000.00]
123767 14
SHOULDANYOFTHEABOVEDESCRIBEDPOLICIESBECANCELLEDBEFORETHEEXPIRATION
DATETHEREOF,THEISSUINGCOMPANYWILLMAILTEN(10)DAYSWRITTENNOTICETOTHE
PARTIESTOWHOMTHISCERTIFICATEISISSUED.
Datedat_____________________________On__________________________________
BY:_________________________________
AuthorizedInsuranceRepresentative
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
1
7D.ConsiderationofapprovingtheconceptofenteringintoaJointPowersAgreement
forpublictransitserviceinMonticelloandotherWrightCountycities (JO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilisaskedtoconsidergrantingconceptualapprovalofenteringajointpowers
agreementwithWrightCountycitiesforcontinuingtransitserviceinMonticello.Since
theearly1990’s,CityofMonticelloresidents,throughtheHeartlandExpressandlater
RiverRider,havebenefittedfromMnDOTtransitprogramswith85%oftransitexpense
fundedbystatedollarsandthebalancefundedbyfarerevenueandapropertytax
contribution.Asaresultofthestatecontributionandassociatedregulationsgoverning
accessibility,arelativelyinexpensiveoptionforlocaltransportationhasbeenavailableto
cityresidents.Accordingtothecurrentdriver,thereareonaverageabout35rides
providedperdaywithanumberofcustomersthatrelygreatlyonbus.Itisestimatedthat
over200,000rideshavebeenprovidedsinceinception.
WhenHeartlandExpresswasoperating,theannualcitycontributionwasinthe
neighborhoodof$16,000peryear.DuringtheRiverRidertenure,theCitybudgeted
$3,000peryeartowardpurchaseofabus.
Asyouhavelikelyheardsomemonthsago,theRiverRiderpartnershipbetween
SherburneandWrightCountyisendingoperationsonJune30th.Inrecentmonths,an
effortsupportedbyMnDOThasbeenmadetohaveWrightCountyjoinwithTrailblazer
Transit,currentlyoperatedunderapartnershipbetweenSibleyandMcLeodCounties.
TherelationshipbetweenWrightCountyandSibley/McLeoddidnotcoalesce,and
MnDOTwasnotsupportiveofalternativeideaspresentedbyWrightCountyfor
providingservice.
OnWednesday,May21st,theTrailblazerBoardreaffirmedapreviousannouncementthat
servicewouldbeprovidedtoWrightCountystartingJuly1st.Foran18monthperiod,
therewouldbenolocalsharerequirementforlocalgovernmentsduringthisperiod.
FollowingareafewofthefactorsthatmayhaveaffectedtheTrailblazerdecisionto
provideservicetoWrightCountyunderthetermsabove.
Trailblazerhasobtaineda$500KcommitmentfromtheStateofMNtoassistwith
theWrightCountyservicetransition.
TrailblazerBoardlearnedthattheCitiesofAnnandale,Buffalo,Delano,Howard
LakeandMontrosehadalreadyformallyapprovedenteringajointpowers
agreementthusformingthebeginningsofanentityrepresentingWrightCounty
residentsgoingforward.Inadditionthereareprospectsforothercitiesjoiningas
well.
FunctionalIndustrieshasenteredintoacontractwithTrailblazerforproviding
transitforapopulationthatishighlydependentonaffordablepublic
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
2
transportationinWrightCounty.Thisresultsinavailabilityofbusestoservethe
generalpopulationinWrightCountyduringtheday.
WrightCountyBoardofCommissionershad,onthepreviousTuesday,passeda
motionstatingthatWrightCountypreferstheprocurementmethodforproviding
servicetoWrightCountybutwouldnotgetinthewayofTrailblazerserving
WrightCounty.
OtherWrightCountycities,suchasMonticello,havenotformallyaddressedthetopicor
havedonesoandtabledthematterformoreinformation.
WithTrailblazerbecomingtheMnDOT-backedprovideroftransitinWrightCounty,
Monticelloneedstodetermineifitwishestojointhiscoalitionthroughajointpowers
agreementandthushavevoiceinthedesign,delivery,andcostoftransitservicesfor
2015andforward.Thedraftoftheagreementisattachedforyourreview.
Itshouldbenotedthat,throughoutthediscussion,ithasbeenrecognizedbyallinvolved
thatcountygovernmentisbestsuitedforprovidingcounty-wideservicefroman
efficiencyandcostdistributionstandpoint.Ihavebeentoldbythosepresentattherecent
TrailblazermeetingthattheTrailblazerleftthedooropentotheWrightCountyBoardfor
takingoverforthecitycoalitionatsomepointinthefuture.
A1.BudgetImpact:Nonefor2014and2015.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Stafftimeinvolvedintransitsystemdevelopmentand
operationswillbeincreasedunderajointpowersarrangement.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotionsupportingparticipationinaJointPowersAgreementonaconceptbasis.
2.MotiontodenyconceptapprovalofparticipationinaJointPowersAgreement.
3.MotiontotableactiononaJointPowersAgreement.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
Itisfortunatethatthetransitprogramstartedintheearly1990’swillbeavailablevia
TrailblazeronJuly1stthrough2015withnolocalgovernmentsharerequired.
Itmakessensetohaveaseatatthetableandavoiceinthedesignofthetransitsystem
operation.However,sinceadecisionhasnowbeenmadebyMNDOTandservicewillbe
providedonJuly1,animmediatedecisionisnotquiteasurgent.Thereforeitwouldbe
myrecommendationtohaveCounciltabletheitemtoprovidetimefortheCity
AdministratorandCityAttorneytofullyreviewthedraftJointPowersAgreementandto
CityCouncilAgenda:05/27/14
3
allowtimetoidentifyassociatedcostconsiderationsfortheCityofMonticellopriorto
approval.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
A.ProposedJointPowersAgreementforprovisionoftransitserviceforWrightCounty
cities
B.CopyofemailfromGaryLudwig,ExecutiveDirectorofTrailblazerTransit
WRIGHTCOUNTYAREATRANSPORTATION
JOINTPOWERSAGREEMENT
ThepartiestothisAgreementaregovernmentalcorporationsunderthelawsoftheStateofMinnesota
andlocatedinWrightCounty,Minnesota.
RECITALS
WHEREAS,MinnesotaStatute§471.59authorizesthejointandcooperativeexerciseofpowerscommon
tothecontractingparties.
WHEREAS,theundersignedpartiesdesiretoprovideforanagreementbetweenandamongthemto
establishajointpowersboardforTransportationforpurposedofprovidingacoordinatedservice
deliveryandfundingsourceforpublictransportation;and
WHEREAS,itistheresolutionofthepoliticalsubdivisionforeachundersignedpartythatitisinthebest
interestsofthecitizensofeachpoliticalsubdivisiontoenterintothisAgreement.
NOWTHEREFORE,ITISMUTUALLYAGREEDANDUNDERSTOODASFOLLOWS:
1.GeneralPurpose.PursuanttotheauthorityoftheJointPowersAct,thePartiesdesireand
intendtoprovideaffordablePublicTransportationtotheircommunities.ThegoalofthePartiesisto
providepeopleintheircommunitieswithmobilityandaccesstoemployment,communityresources,
medicalcareandrecreationalopportunities;whilereducingtheimpactofroadcongestion,traveltimes,
airpollutionandthecostofroadmaintenanceandrepair,energyandoilconsumptionfortheir
communities.
2.JoinderofWrightCountyPoliticalSubdivisions.TheundersignedWrightCountyPolitical
Subdivisionsherebyagreetojointogetherforthepurposeofcoordinatingthedeliveryofpublic
transportationservicesandestablishingajointfundingsourceforsaidservicesthroughestablishmentof
aWrightCountyAreaTransportationJointPowersBoard(“WCATBoard”).Thisagreementshallbecome
effectiveuponadoptionofaresolutionbythegoverningbodyofnolessthanthreepolitical
subdivisions,andshallbebindingonallPartieswhohavejoinedthroughadoptionofaresolutionby
theirrespectivegoverningbodiesthroughDecember31st,2019,unlessotherwiseextendedoramended
bythePartiestothisAgreement.
3.BoardComposition.EachmembershallappointannuallyarepresentativetotheWCATBoard.
Membercitiescanappointanalternaterepresentativewhomayactintheplaceandsteadofanabsent
representativefromthatgovernmentalunit.
4.FundingServices.TheWCATBoardisauthorizedtoprocuresuchStateandFederalfundingasis
availablefortheprovisionofpublictransportationservices.Eachmemberunitagreestopaya
proportionateshareoftheremainingunfundedexpensesandcapitalexpensesbaseduponthe
proportionoftheirunit’srideshareattributabletothegovernmentalunitfortheprioryearusingorigin
ofrideindeterminingrideshare).Thereshallbeaninitial$1,000feefromeachmemberunittocover
initialadministrativeservices.Thisfeewillbeanannualfee,adjustedasnecessarybytheWCATBoard,
whendeemedappropriatetoprovidefortheproperoperationsoftheBoard.Forthe2015fiscalyear
onlyoperatingandcapitalexpensesshallbebaseduponprojectedridesharefor2015asdeterminedby
theWCATBoardpriortoJanuary1,2015andexpensesshallbeallocatedproportionatelyamongthe
memberentities.Atendofthe2015fiscalyear,theWCATBoardshallperformareconciliationof
operatingexpensesandcapitalexpensesbaseduponactualridership,andfundsshallbepayablefrom
orreimbursedtomembercitiesbaseduponthedifferencebetweeninitialpaymentsandreconciled
amounts.
5.Meetings.TheWCATBoardshallmeetatleastannuallyonascheduledeterminedbytheWCAT
Board.AllmeetingsoftheWCATBoardshallbeconductedinamannerconsistentwiththeMinnesota
OpenMeetingLaw,Minn.Stat.§13D.01,et.seq.,asamended.Specialmeetingsmaybecalledbythe
Chairoruponwrittenrequestofthree(3)ormoreboardmembers.Writtennoticeofanyspecial
meetingsshallbesenttoallboardmembersandtothecityclerkofeachmembercitytocomplywith
postingrequirements.
6.PowersandDuties.ThepowersanddutiesoftheWCATBoardinclude,butarenotlimitedto,
expendingfundsforthepurposeofestablishing,funding,coordinating,administeringandoperatinga
publictransportationserviceincluding:
a.Applyfor,receiveandexpendStateandFederalfundsavailableforsaidpurpose,aswell
asfundsfromotherlawfulsources,includingfares,donationsorgiftsforthepurposeofprovidingpublic
transportationservicesandsuchsupplementalservicesdeemedadvisablebytheWCATBoard.
b.Approveanannualbudget.
c.AdoptandimplementamanagementplantocarryouttheWCATBoard’spurpose.
d.EnterintocontractswithpublicorprivateentitiesastheBoarddeemsnecessaryto
accomplishthepurposeforwhichtheBoardisorganized,including,butnotlimitedto,thehiringofany
consultants.
e.ObtainsuchinsuranceastheBoarddeemsnecessaryfortheprotectionoftheWCAT
Board,membersoftheWCATBoard,membercities,anditsproperty.
f.Exerciseallotherlawfulpowersnecessaryandincidentaltotheimplementationof
publictransportationservicesandthepurposesandpowerssetforthherein.
h.TheWCATBoardhasnoauthoritytoobtainoroperateanindependenttransitservice
withouttheexpressapprovalofamajorityofthememberpoliticalsubdivisions.
i.TheWCATBoardhasnoauthoritytolevytaxesorissuedebtforoperatingcapitalor
debtservicepurposesunlessapprovedbyallpoliticalsubdivisions.
j.TheWCATBoardhasnoauthoritytoissuedebtthatexceedsthetermofthis
agreement.
7.Voting.PriortoJanuary1,2015,eachmembershallhaveonevote.BeginningJanuary1,2015,
eachmember’svotingauthorityshallbedeterminedbythejurisdiction’srideshareofthepreviousyear.
EveryGovernmentalUnitshallbeentitledtoonevoteplusonevoteper3,000rides.Priortothefirst
meetinginMarchtheSecretaryoftheBoardshalldeterminethenumberofvotesforeachMemberin
accordancewiththissectionandcertifytheresultstotheChair.Aquorumshallconsistofasimple
majority(51%)ofrepresentativesfromthememberentities.Asimplemajorityvoteoftheboard
memberspresentatthemeetingwithavalidquorumshallberequiredbytheWCATBoardtotake
actionunlessotherwiseprovidedinthisAgreementorbylaw.
8.Officers.Thereshallbeachair,avicechair,andasecretaryelectedfromthemembersatthe
initialmeetingofeachyear.Theofficersshallbeelectedfromdifferentmembercities.TheWCAT
Boardmayelectorappointsuchotherofficersasitdeemsnecessarytoconductitsmeetingsandaffairs.
9.EffectiveDate/Termination.Thisagreementshallbecomeeffectiveuponadoptionofa
resolutionbytheGoverningBodyofeachmemberunitandbeeffectiveforFiveYearsafteradoption.
ThisAgreementshallremainineffectuntilapartyheretogivesnoticetotheWCATBoardofitsintention
towithdraw.NoticeofwithdrawalmustbegivenbyApril1ofagivenyear.Terminationwillbeeffective
attheconclusionofthefiscalyear.
10.NoWaiver.Nothinghereinshallbeconstruedtowaiveorlimitanyimmunityfrom,orlimitation
on,liabilityavailabletoanyparty,whethersetforthinMinnesotaStatutes,Chapter466orotherwise.
11.Severability.Ifanysection,subdivisionorprovisionofthisAgreementshallbeheldinvalidor
unenforceableforanyreason,theinvalidityorunenforceabilityofsuchsection,subdivisionorprovision
shallnotinvalidateorrenderunenforceableanyoftheremainingprovisions.
12.Amendment.AnyamendmentstothisAgreementmustbeinwriting,signedbytheparties,
followingapprovaloftheirrespectiveGoverningBodies.
13.GoverningLaw.ThisAgreementshallbeinterpretedinaccordancewiththelawsoftheStateof
Minnesota.
14.LiabilityandInsurance.Eachpartyshallbeliableforitstortsandthetortsofitsemployees,
agentsandconsultantsinundertakingitsrespectiveindividualresponsibilitiesasdescribedinthisJoint
PowersAgreement.Notwithstandinganylanguagetothecontrary,thePartiesagreethatliabilityarising
outoftheactivitiesoftheJointPowersAssociation,JointPowersBoardandthePartiestothis
AgreementshallbesubjecttotherequirementsofMinnesotaStatutes§471.59,subdivision1(b),asit
maybeamended.ThePartiesintendthattheJointPowersAuthoritybeinsuredforitstortliabilityand
generalliabilityasaJointPowersBoard.Nothinghereinshallbeconstruedtowaiveorlimitany
immunityfrom,orlimitationon,liabilityavailabletoanyparty,whethersetforthinMinnesotaStatutes,
Chapter466orotherwise.
15.Disputes.ThepartiesagreethattheywillsubmitanydisputesunderthisAgreementto
mediationpriortoresortingtoanactioninCourt.
BysigningthisAgreement,thepartiesheretocertifythatthesamehasbeenapprovedbytheir
respectiveGoverningBodies.
By_____________________________________By____________________________________
MayorMayor
ATTEST:ATTEST:
______________________________________________________________________________
CityAdministratorCityAdministrator
By_____________________________________By____________________________________
MayorMayor
ATTEST:ATTEST:
______________________________________________________________________________
CityAdministratorCityAdministrator
By______________________________________
WrightCountyBoardChair
ATTEST:
_________________________________________
WrightCountyOfficial