The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 06-08-2015AGENDA REGULAR MEETING – MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 8th, 2015 – 7 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault and Glen Posusta 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Meeting Minutes  Special Meeting Minutes from May 26th, 2015  Regular Meeting Minutes from May 26th, 2015 C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda D. Citizen Comments E. Public Service Announcements/Updates  Walk ‘n Roll (6/13)  Grand Opening Bertram Beach & Playground (6/27) F. Council Liaison Updates  Brian Stumpf (BCOL, IEDC, FAB)  Charlotte Gabler (FAB, PC)  Lloyd Hilgart (IEDC, EDA, Hwy 25 Corridor Coalition)  Tom Perrault (EDA, Safety)  Glen Posusta (BCOL) G. Department Updates  Sheriff’s Office (Anselment)  City Administrator (O’Neill) 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills for June 8th B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures C. Consideration of appointing representatives to the Monticello Planning Commission to fill vacancies for terms to expire 12/31/15 and 12/31/16 D. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2015-042 accepting a contribution from Cargill Kitchen Solutions for flower plantings on Broadway West median E. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2015-043 accepting a contribution from the Monticello Lions to the Street Department for traffic control devices F. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2015-047 accepting a contribution from the Monticello Lions to the Parks Department for kiosk signage G. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2015-046 approving the Final Plat and Development Agreement for the Vine Street Place a two-lot subdivision in an R-2 (Single and Two Family Residence) District and approval of encroachment agreement. Applicant: Benoit, Patrick H. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2015-045 approving a Final Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Plat and Development Agreement for Hoglund Bus Park, a two lot commercial development in an existing Planned Unit Development District, and to approve a sidewalk easement associated with the plat. Applicant: WAG Partners, LLP I. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2015-036A approving an assessment agreement with Northern States Power, dba Xcel Energy for First Lake Substation J. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2015-044 approving a request for an Amendment to Development Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Final Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a single lot commercial development in a B-4 (Regional Business) District. Applicant: MF Monticello, LLC K. Consideration of adopting Ordinance No. 616 for Amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5, Section 3 – Accessory Use Standards and Chapter 8, Section 4 – Definitions, as related to regulations for Accessory Building - Major and Accessory Building – Minor. Applicant: City of Monticello L. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2015-048 approving an application for a Gambling Premises Permit to conduct gambling at the Monticello Country Club. Applicant: Monticello Youth Hockey Program M. Consideration of authorizing 50/50 cost share with the City of Windom for purchasing bandwidth for final implementation of 10 Gig Ring N. Consideration of authorizing sending a letter of interest to participate in cooperative cost saving ventures with City of Windom related to telephone switching equipment 2a. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings None 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2015-049 accepting bids and awarding contract for the School Boulevard/Fallon Avenue and 85th Street Improvements, City Project No. 14C003 B. Consideration of approving initial purchase and deployment of Calix GigaCenters for FiberNet Monticello residential customers C. Consideration of approving concept of FiberNet Monticello contracting with Yondoo for video hosted services D. Consideration of approving process and terms of sale for City-owned property located at 1022 W. River Street 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment SpecialCityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page1|4 MINUTES SPECIALMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL Tuesday,May26,2015–5p.m. NorthMississippiRoom,MonticelloCommunityCenter Present:BrianStumpf,CharlotteGabler,LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta Absent:None Others:JeffO’Neill,AngelaSchumann,ShibaniBisson,ChuckRickart(WSB),Bill Tapper(EDA/TAC) 1.CalltoOrder MayorBrianStumpfcalledthespecialmeetingtoorderat5p.m. 2.PurposeofWorkshop:DiscussionofthefollowingitemswasannouncedbyMayor Stumpf. A.AlignmentofSchoolBoulevardWestextensiontoCountyRoad39 B.OptionsforalignmentofFallonAvenueOverpass 3.ReviewofpotentialalignmentoptionsforSchoolBoulevardWestextensionto CountyRoad39 AngelaSchumannintroducedthisitemandindicatedthatthepresentationwillprovidean explanationtoCouncilabouttheproposedalignmentfortheextensionofSchool BoulevardWesttoCountyRoad39.Schumannindicatedtherearetwoconceptualroad alignmentsanddisplayedthoseonamap.SchumanntalkedabouttheBertramChainof LakesParkandthecoordinationbetweentheCityandCountytodeveloptheparkland. Thatdesigndoesnotincludearoadthroughthepark.TheCity’sTransportationPlan showstheSchoolBoulevardextensionasan“AreatobeStudied”anddoesnotspecifya particularalignmentforSchoolBoulevardtoCR39.Adecisionneedstobemade whethertoaligntheroadwaythroughtheparkforgrantwritingpurposes.Angela SchumannturnedthediscussionovertoShibaniBissonandChuckRickart. ShibaniBissonexplainedthatconceptroadwayalignmentswereconsideredin2006 whenKarlsburgerFoodswasproposingtolocateintheOtterCreekIndustrialPark,the HeritagedevelopmentwasproposedandtheYMCAwasconsideringsellingtheir property.TheCouncilapprovedaconceptalignmentofextendingSchoolBlvdthrough theYMCApropertyatthattime.However,thetransportationplanindicatedthatthearea wastobestudied.Sinceconditionshavechanged,staffhasreevaluatedthealignementof SchoolBlvdandtheassociatedimpactstothetransporationsystem.Twoconceptual alignmentsarebeingpresented,oneforSchoolBoulevardextendedthroughthe northeasternportionoftheYMCACampManitoupropertyandtheotheralignment connectingwiththeexistingDaltonAvenue. SpecialCityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page2|4 ChuckRickartexplainedthatthereisastudybeingdoneforpotentialsitesforafutureI- 94interchangeintheareaofCountyRoad39orOrchardRoad.Thiswouldlikelyimpact trafficonChelseaRoad,90th Street,andSchoolBoulevard.Chuckexplainedthe transportationimpactswiththealignmentoptions. BrianStumpfaskedwhetherAlternative2wouldadverselyimpacttheabilitytodevelop theSpikepropertythatwouldbeintersectedbytheproposedroadalignment.Shibani BissonexplainedthattheAlternative2alignmentwillbeguidedbydevelopmentandthe optionsevaluatedallowforadequatedevelopmentarea.TheXcelsubstationwasalso consideredwhenevaluatingthealignments.Theroadwayisshownextendingthroughthe narrowparcelthatintersectionswith90th Street,ownedbySpike. GlenPosustaaskedwhythisroadextensionisbeingdiscussedatthistime.Angela SchumannexplainedthattheCountyandCityareapplyingforagrantforanothersection ofBertramChainofLakesparklandandtheyneedtoknowifthefutureroadextension mightgothroughtheparkland.Ifaroadwouldbisecttheparkland,thatwouldhavetobe indicatedinthegrantapplication.GlenPosustaexpressedhisconcernaboutchoosingan alignmentatthistimewhenfuturedevelopmentisnotlikelytotakeplaceforquitesome time.JeffO’NeillstatedthattheCityhasbeensuccessfulindefiningcollectorroad alignmentsinadvanceandusingthoseplanstoguidedeveloperswhentheymake inquiries.Inthiscase,thefuturealignmentwasidentifiedtogothroughtheparklandand citystafffeltitwouldbebeneficialtochangethatidentificationnowratherthanlater. Theactualroadconstructionwouldnottakeplaceuntildrivenbydevelopment. ChuckRickartmentionedthatthereareavarietyofoptionstoalignSchoolBoulevardif thedecisionismadetoavoidroutingitthroughBertramparkland.AngelaSchumann notedthatCouncilcouldelecttonotmakeachoiceforanalternativerealignmentwith DaltonAvenue,butinsteadjustmakeadecisionnottoextendSchoolBoulevardthrough theparkanddetermineanewalignmentatalatertime. BillTapperfromtheEDAcommentedthatLukeDahlheimerofDahlheimerDistributing expressedconcernaboutanalignmentwithDaltonAveashefelttherewouldbenegative trafficimpactsforthebusinessesinthatarea. BrianStumpfindicatedthathewouldliketoseeafinaldecisionforalignmentdeferredto afuturetime.HewouldliketoseeSchoolBoulevardterminatedattheSpikeproperty andnotatDaltonAvenue.However,hedoesunderstandthatCouncilshouldprovide directionforthegrantapplication. BrianStumpfstatedthatCouncilwillbeaskedtotakeactionattheregularCouncil meeting. 4.ReviewofpreferredoptionforFallonAvenueOverpassalignment JeffO’NeillintroducedthisitemandindicatedthattheoptionsfortheFallonAvenue OverpassalignmenthavebeendiscussedindetailovermanymonthsbytheCity’s SpecialCityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page3|4 TransportationAdvisoryCommittee.ThemeetingwasturnedovertoChuckRickart fromWSBwhohasbeenworkingonthisproject.Rickartnotedthatlandacquisitions needtotakeplaceforrightofwayandeasementsprimarilyfromSt.Henry’sChurch beforefinaldesigncommences.ChuckRickarttalkedaboutalignmentoption3Awhich incorporatestworoundaboutsonthenorthsideofthefreeway.Hepointedouttheareas thatwillneedtobeacquiredforeachoftheroundabouts.Option3Amakesaconnection atWashingtonStreet,whichwouldbebeneficialiftherewouldeverbeasecondriver crossingatWashingtonStreet.ThisalternativewasapprovedbytheTransportation AdvisoryCommitteealthoughnotunanimously.Ifoption3Aisselected,theproject couldbedoneinphases. GlenPosustaaskediftherewasawaythattheprojectcouldbedonetokeeptheroadway opentotrafficduringconstruction.ChuckRickartexplainedthatitwouldhavetobe closedattimes.GlenPosustasuggestedthattheprojectbephasedoveronetimeframe, ratherthanpartnowandpartinanotheryear,soastolimitthelengthoftimethattraffic wouldbeimpactedbystreetclosures. ChuckRickartreviewedalignmentoption5whichutilizesoneroundaboutonthenorth sideofthefreeway.ThesmallsectionofFallonAvenueonthenorthsideofthefreeway wouldlinkWashingtonand7th Streetwitharoundaboutattheconfluenceoffourstreet segments.TheMalonepropertywouldbeaffectedandwouldneedtobeacquiredwith thisoption.TheBusch’s(RandMansion)andMalone’sarenotinfavorofthisoption. ChuckRickartnotedthatthisalternativewouldhaveaslightlyhighercostthanoption 3A. ChuckRickartcommentedonthetrafficinteractionsandhowtheycouldbeimpactedby eitherofthesetwoalternatives.Option5wouldhavemoretrafficinteractioncompared toOption3A,whichseparatestrafficattheintersectionsof7thStreetandWashington andtheproposedFallonAve.Also,eastboundtrafficfrom7th StreettoWashington wouldneedtogofurthereasttoenterandexittheroundaboutcomparedtoOption3A. BillTapper,memberoftheEDAandTransportationAdvisoryCommittee,explainedhis reasonsforpreferringOption5.Withoption3A,heisconcernedabouttheslopeof7th StreetasboundtrafficapproachestheroundaboutattheFallonAvenueoverpass.Tapper statedthathepersonallylikesroundaboutsandwouldprefertoseearoundaboutatthe intersectionofFallonAvenueandChelseaRoadwhentheoverpassisconstructed. BrianStumpfaskedChuckRickarttotalkabouttimingontheconstructionofthe overpassandstreetalignments.ChuckRickartstatedthatthereisnostatefunding availablesoitwouldneedtobefundedwithlocalfundsandpossiblysomestateaid money.ChuckRickartnotedthatthereisarequirementforthecitytoconstructthe FallonAvenueoverpassbeforeanyfurtherinterchangesareaddedwithincitylimits.It wassuggestedtodosometrafficcountsinthe7th Streetarea.ChuckRickartcommented thattheprojectcouldbestartedasearlyas2016,providedthatlandacquisitionsand alignmentdecisionsarecompletednow. SpecialCityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page4|4 BrianStumpfindicatedthatthistopicwillbeontheregularcouncilagendaforashort presentationanddecisionbyCouncilonthealignment. ChuckRickartalsonotedthat,onthesouthsideofthefreeway,theFallonAvenue overpasswillneedsometypeoftrafficcontrolattheintersectionwithChelseaRoad. GlenPosustaaskedwhichtypeofintersectionwouldmovetrafficthebest.Chuck Rickartindicatedthattrafficstudiesshowthatroundaboutswouldservetokeeptraffic movingateachofthedesignatedsitesinthedesignofbothoptions. JeffO’Neillcommentedthatthesingleroundaboutoption(#5)wastheoriginal preferenceoftheTransportationAdvisoryCommittee.However,oncetheyweighedthe optionsandcommentsfromlandowners,theychoseoption3A. 5.Adjournment TOMPERRAULTMOVEDTOADJOURNTHESPECIALMEETINGAT6:03P.M. CHARLOTTEGABLERSECONDEDTHEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED5-0. Recorder:CatherineM.Shuman____ Approved: Attest:____________________________ CityAdminstrator CityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page1|11 MINUTES REGULARMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL Tuesday,May26th,2015–7p.m. MississippiRoom,MonticelloCommunityCenter Present:BrianStumpf,CharlotteGabler,LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta Absent:None 1.GeneralBusiness A.CalltoOrder ThemeetingwascalledtoorderbyMayorStumpfat7p.m.withaquorum present. B.PledgeofAllegiance Thepledgeofallegiancewasrecited. C.ApprovalofMeetingMinutes •SpecialMeetingMinutesfromApril27th,2015 TOMPERRAULTNOTEDAFEWCORRECTIONSHEHAD REPORTEDANDMOVEDTOAPPROVETHEAPRIL27TH,2015 SPECIALMEETINGMINUTESASPRESENTED.LLOYDHILGART SECONDEDTHEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED5-0. •RegularMeetingMinutesfromMay11th,2015 TOMPERRAULTNOTEDAFEWCORRECTIONSHEHAD REPORTEDANDMOVEDTOAPPROVETHEMAY11TH,2015 REGULARMEETINGMINUTESASPRESENTED.LLOYD HILGARTSECONDEDTHEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED5-0. •CorrectionstoApril27th RegularMeetingMinutes LLOYDHILGARTMOVEDTOAPPROVETHECORRECTIONSTO THEAPRIL27TH,2015REGULARMEETINGMINUTESAS PRESENTED.CHARLOTTEGABLERSECONDEDTHEMOTION. MOTIONCARRIED5-0. D.ConsiderationofAddingItemstotheAgenda •#2L–SunsetPondsSecondAdditioneasementvacationresolution(staff) •Illegaldumping;recyclingcarts(CharlotteGabler) •GoodwilldropboxatEastview(BrianStumpf) •Wristbands(BrianStumpf) •FriendshipIsland(BrianStumpf) E.CitizenComments None CityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page2|11 F.PublicServiceAnnouncements/Updates •Cargillthankyou–RachelLeonardannouncedathankyoutoCargill KitchenSolutionemployeesforvolunteeringwithclean-upeffortsinthe City.TheydothisonanannualbasisanditisahugebenefittotheCity. G.CouncilLiaisonUpdates •BrianStumpf(MCC,FAB,TransportationAdvisoryCommittee,Personnel)– MCCAdvisoryBoard:visitsaredown;possiblemoveofFriendshipIsland; minimumwagereviewforpart-timeemployees;rateincreasesfor membershipswillberesearched.FAB:discussed10GBringandMetaswitch sharingwithWindomnet;videocontracts;hiringofBusinessMgrandupdate ofordinance.TransportationAdvisoryCommittee:allitemsonregular agendatonight. •CharlotteGabler(FAB,Personnel)–Personnel:volunteerappreciationdayin Julytorecognizecommissionmembers;employeeappreciationdayin August;applicationsreceivedforCityClerkandBuildingOfficialand interviewstobescheduled. •LloydHilgart(EDA,TransportationAdvisoryCommittee)–Transportation AdvisoryCommittee:workingonalignmentoptionsforFallonAvenue overpass.EDA–levydiscussion,whichisincludedinregularagenda. •TomPerrault(EDA,PAC)–PAC:meetinginJuly.TomPerraultattended WrightCountymeetingonsolargardensandSafetyCommitteemeeting. •GlenPosusta(BCOLRFP)–ParksCommissioncomingupthisweek. H.DepartmentUpdates •Workshop/SpecialMeetingReview–MayorStumpfnotedthattheworkshop actionsareincludedintheregularagenda. •CityAdministrator–JeffO’Neillreportedonthefollowing:LionsClub40th anniversaryonFriday,May29attheMCCparkinglotfrom6to11:30pm; freetothepublic.HelpCenterhasrescindedtheirletterofintenttomoveto theoldbowlingalley;payingrentonasitewouldimpacttheirabilityto receivecertaingrantsandassistance.JeffO’Neillmentionedpossibilityof collaboratingonconstructionofabuildingneartheJeffersonCommonswater towerthatcouldincludespacefortheHelpCenter. •MarketMatching–JohnUphoffwasnotabletoattendandwillreportat anothertime. 2.ConsentAgenda A.ConsiderationofapprovingthepaymentofbillsforMay26th.THISITEM WASREMOVEDFROMTHECONSENTAGENDA. B.Considerationofapprovingnewhires/departures.ActionTaken:Ratifythe newhiresandterminationsforMCC,CityHall,BuildingDepartment,and WaterDepartment. CityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page3|11 C.Considerationofapprovingthreeapplicationsfortemporaryon-saleliquor licensesfortheMonticelloLionsClubforRiverfestCommunityCelebration eventsonJuly11th-12th,2015.ActionTaken:Approvethreetemporaryon- saleliquorlicenseapplicationsfortheMonticelloLionsfortheRiverfest CommunityCelebrationonJuly11,2015forArtintheParkinEllisonPark, onJuly11,2015fortheRiverfestStreetDanceattheMonticelloCommunity Centerparkinglot,andfortheSundayeventsatEllisonParkonJuly12, 2015;contingentonprovidingthenecessaryliquorliabilityinsurance certificate. D.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-039acceptingquotesandawarding contractforthe2015SealcoatandFogSealProject.ActionTaken:Adopt Resolution#2015-039acceptingthebidsandawardingacontracttoCaldwell AsphaltCompany,Inc.ofHawickMN,basedontheirlowbidof $136,953.36;projecttobecompletedpercontractbyAugust21,2015. E.ConsiderationofapprovingthepurchaseofNeptuneradioreadingunitsforthe WaterDepartment.THISITEMWASREMOVEDFROMTHECONSENT AGENDA. F.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-040acceptingimprovementsand authorizingfinalpaymenttoWHServicesforthe2014StreetLighting Improvements(West7th betweenElmStreetandCR39),CityProjectNo. 14C001.THISITEMWASREMOVEDFROMTHECONSENTAGENDA. G.ConsiderationofratifyingthenegotiatedLaborAgreementbetweentheCityof MonticelloandtheInternationalUnionofOperatingEngineers,Local49for April1,2015toMarch31,2017.THISITEMWASREMOVEDFROMTHE CONSENTAGENDA. H.Considerationofapprovingfinalpaymentof$181,544.53toVeoliaWaterfor 2014wastewatertreatmentplantcontractservices.THISITEMWAS REMOVEDFROMTHECONSENTAGENDA. I.ConsiderationofratifyingtheEDAAnnualWorkPlan.THISITEMWAS REMOVEDFROMTHECONSENTAGENDA. J.Considerationofapprovinganamendmenttotheencroachmentagreementforthe CedarStreetAddition(GoodwillIndustriesStore).Applicant:Oppidan/Fourth StreetParkingPartnership,LLP.ActionTaken:Approveanamendmentto theencroachmentagreementfortheCedarStreetAdditionfor Oppidan/FourthStreetParkingPartnership,LLP,statedasfollows: ENCROACHMENTAUTHORIZATION.TheCityherebyapprovesencroachmentin itseasementareasfortheconstruction,use,andmaintenanceofdriveaisles,parking stalls,curbs,streetlighting,andlandscapinginthecross-hatchedareasdepictedon theattachedExhibit“B.” CityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page4|11 [PriorSection2andpriorExhibitBwillbedeletedandreplaced] K.ConsiderationofapprovingalettertotheMinnesotaPublicUtilitiesCommission andMinnesotaDepartmentofCommerceregardingcommunitysolargardens. ActionTaken:ApprovesubmissionofalettertotheMinnesotaPublic UtilitiesCommissionandMinnesotaDepartmentofCommerceregarding communitysolargardens. L.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-023Aapprovingarevisiontoa conditionintheoriginalresolutionforSunsetPonds2nd Additioneasement vacation.ActionTaken:AdoptResolution#2015-023Aapprovingthe vacationofeasementsforSunsetPondsSecondAddition,witharevisionto theconditionsasfollows: •ApprovaloftheSunsetPondsThirdAdditionfinalplatbytheCityCouncilofthe CityofMonticello. •ThefinalplatofrecordshallincludetheWrightCountyRecorder’sdocument numbersforthevacationeasementsdescribedherein. •ACertificateofApprovalforVacationofDrainageandUtilityEasementsbe recordedattheWrightCountyRecorder’sOffice. LLOYDHILGARTMOVEDTOAPPROVETHECONSENTAGENDAWITHTHE REMOVALOFITEMSA,E,F,G,H,ANDI.CHARLOTTEGABLERSECONDED THEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED5-0. 2A.Considerationofitemsremovedfromtheconsentagendafordiscussion 2A.ConsiderationofapprovingthepaymentofbillsforMay26th GlenPosustaaskedaboutthecarpetingintheRomp&Stompandwhetherthatwas budgeted.JeffO’Neillindicateditwas.GlenPosustaaskedwhylumberwaspurchased fromBigLakeLumberinsteadofHomeDepot.WayneObergreportedthatstaff indicatedtheycouldnotgetthesematerialsatHomeDepot.GlenPosustaaskedabout purchaseofasignforthefuturedogpark.CathyShumanexplainedthesignwas approvedinoriginalpresentationforadogpark;costtobereimbursedfromdonated funds. GLENPOSUSTAMOVEDTOAPPROVETHEPAYMENTOFBILLAND PURCHASECARDREGISTERSFORATOTALOF$676,371.61.CHARLOTTE GABLERSECONDEDTHEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED5-0. 2E.ConsiderationofapprovingthepurchaseofNeptuneradioreadingunitsforthe WaterDepartment CharlotteGablerwantedtoverifythatthesewerethesameunitsthatwerebroughtto CouncilforapprovalbackinNovember.WayneObergconfirmedthat. CityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page5|11 CHARLOTTEGABLERMOVEDTOAPPROVETHEPURCHASEOF650 NEPTUNERADIOREADUNITSATACOSTOF$69,641TOCOMEOUTOFTHE 2015WATERDEPARTMENTBUDGET.TOMPERRAULTSECONDEDTHE MOTION.MOTIONCARRIED5-0. 2F.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-040acceptingimprovementsand authorizingfinalpaymenttoWHServicesforthe2014StreetLightingImprovements (West7th betweenElmStreetandCR39),CityProjectNo.14C001 CharlotteGableraskedifthereductionthathadbeendiscussedpreviouslyhadbeen deductedfromthefinalpayment.JeffO’Neillconfirmedthatwasthecase. CHARLOTTEGABLERMOVEDTOADOPTRESOLUTION#2015-040 ACCEPTINGIMPROVEMENTSANDAUTHORIZINGFINALPAYMENTOF $10,579.87TOWHSERVICESANDENTERINTOAMAINTENANCE AGREEMENTWITHWHSERVICESFORWEST7TH STREETLIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS,CITYPROJECTNO.14C001.TOMPERRAULTSECONDED THEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED5-0. TomPerraultnotedthattheresolutionclauseaboutthecontractneedstostateMayorand CityAdministrator,ratherthanCityClerk. 2G.ConsiderationofratifyingthenegotiatedLaborAgreementbetweentheCityof MonticelloandtheInternationalUnionofOperatingEngineers,Local49forApril1, 2015toMarch31,2017 TomPerraultstatedthathehasanissuewiththelanguageinthelaboragreementfor Article10.01relatedtoovertimepaybeinggrantedinexcessof8hoursofworkwithina 24-hourperiodoftime.Hefeelsthatovertimepayshouldnotbegrantedonadailybasis, butwasokaywiththe40hourworkweekovertimeprovisions.GlenPosustaquestioned whetherCouncilisreallyabletopullindividualitemsoutoftheproposedcontract.Jeff O’NeillstatedthatCouncilcouldeitherdenyorapprovethecontractwitha recommendationforachangethatwouldhavetobenegotiatedandbroughtbackto Councilforapproval.Councilmembersindicatedthatsupervisorsshouldbemakingsure employeesdonotreceiveovertimepayinexcessof8hourswithina24-hourtimeframe unlessitisabsolutelynecessaryandapprovedinadvance. LLOYDHILGARTMOVEDTORATIFYTHE2015-2017LOCAL49UNION CONTRACTASNEGOTIATED,EFFECTIVEAPRIL1,2015.GLENPOSUSTA SECONDEDTHEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED4-1WITHTOMPERRAULT VOTINGINOPPOSITION.STAFFWASDIRECTEDTOKEEPTRACKOF OVERTIMEHOURSTOSEEIFTHEREAREANYISSUESWITHOVERTIMEPAY WITHINTHE24-HOURTIMEFRAME;IFSO,THISWOULDBEADDRESSEDIN NEXTCONTRACTRENEWALPERIOD. CityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page6|11 2H.Considerationofapprovingfinalpaymentof$181,544.53toVeoliaWaterfor 2014wastewatertreatmentplantcontractservices BrianStumpfaskedWayneObergtoaddresstheamountpayableontheVeoliaWater contract.WayneObergaskedthattherearetwopartstothewastewatertreatmentplant contract:oneisforreimbursableexpensesandoneisforpersonalservices.The2014 contractbudgetwassubmittedbyChuckKeyeswiththeamountsof$234,504for reimbursableexpensesand$585,096forpersonalservices.Thereareprovisionsinthe contractwhichincludesanannualfeeadjustmentformulafordeterminingthebase compensationifanamountisnotnegotiated.Thiscreatedanincreaseintheamountthat wasbudgeted.2015isthelastyearofthecontractwithVeolia.TheCitywillneedto takeintoconsiderationwhatoptionsareavailableforanewcontractortoutilizeinternal staffing. LloydHilgartcommentedonthechangesinthebudgetreconciliationandstatedthatit appearsthatVeolia’sactualexpendituresarenotpaidinregardtowhatisbudgeted. WayneObergindicatedthatthepaymentsarelinkedtotheformulasinthecontract, whichterminatesattheendof2015. LLOYDHILGARTMOVEDTOAPPROVEFINALPAYMENTOF$181,544.53TO VEOLIAWATERFOR2014WASTEWATERTREATMENTPLANTCONTRACT SERVICES.BRIANSTUMPFSECONDEDTHEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED4-1 WITHGLENPOSUSTAVOTINGINOPPOSITION. 2I.ConsiderationofratifyingtheEDAAnnualWorkPlan TomPerraultnotedthatthestaffreportindicatedthattheWorkPlanwasapproved unanimouslyattheEDAmeetingonMay13,2015,buthehadactuallyvotedagainstit. JeffO’Neillapologizedforreportingthatincorrectlyinhisnotes. LLOYDHILGARTMOVEDTORATIFYTHEEDAANNUALWORKPLAN, CONSISTENTWITHITSADOPTIONBYTHEMONTICELLOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY.CHARLOTTEGABLERSECONDEDTHE MOTION.MOTIONCARRIED4-1WITHTOMPERRAULTVOTINGIN OPPOSITION. 3.PublicHearings -None 4.RegularAgenda A.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-041authorizingaletterofsupport fortheMonarchDevelopmentGroupasrelatedtoanaffordableworkplace townhomedevelopmentontheformerRuffproperty(PID155-500-101418) AngelaSchumannpresentedtheproposalfromMonarchDevelopmentGroupfor developmentofanaffordableworkplacetownhomeproject.Inordertoproceed withtheirapplicationtotheMNHousingFinanceAgencyfortheaffordable CityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page7|11 housingtaxcreditprogram,theyneedCouncilapprovalofaletterofsupportfrom theCity.AngelaSchumanntalkedaboutthesite,whichispartoftheformerRuff Autosalvageyard.AngelaSchumannnotedthattheCityhasalreadyinvestedin thepropertywhentheyreceivedstategrantsforcontaminationclean-upofthe RuffAutosite.Thegoalofthegrantswastoremediatethecontaminationto facilitatefutureresidentialdevelopment,whichmatchesthegoaloftheMonarch Groupproposaltodeveloptownhomeunitsforcityresidents. MikeKearneyofMonarchDevelopmentGroupspokebrieflyabouttheirproposal andhandedoutplansanddrawingsabouttheprojecttocouncilmembers.Their firmisproposingadevelopmentcalledCygnetLanding.Mr.Kearneytalked abouthiscompanyandsomeoftheconsultingfirmsthattheyworkwith.He emphasizedthehighqualityoftheirproducts.CygnetLandingwouldconsistof 45unitsofaffordableworkplacehousing,withrentsrangingfrom$950fora2- bedroomunitto$1,100fora3-bedroom.Tenantswouldhavetomeetincome guidelines.MonarchGroupplanstoinvestabout$10millioninthedevelopment. TheyarelookingforaletterofsupportfromtheCityaspartoftheirapplication processfortheaffordablehousingtaxcredits. BrianStumpfaskedhimtocommentonthetimeline.MikeKearneydiscussed theprocess,whichisverycompetitive.Theywouldnotanticipateapprovalfrom MNHousingFinanceAgencyuntilOctoberattheearliest.Followingthat,they wouldgothroughthecityzoningprocess,withbuildingpermitsissuedand constructionbeginninginSpringof2016.LloydHilgartaskedwhetherthey wouldholdtheseunitsorsellthem.Kearneyexplainedtheywouldholdthe investmentandpartnerwithWellsFargoBankfortheaffordabletaxcredits. Theywouldalsoutilizeapropertymanagementcompanytomanagethe townhomecomplex.Thepropertywouldremainunderthisstatusforatleast15 years.LloydHilgartaskedwhetherthetaxcreditsareasubsidy,allowingthemto rentbelowmarketvalue.Kearneyconfirmedthatthetaxcreditswouldbearent subsidy.However,therentamountsbeingproposedareactuallyatmarketrent forthisarea. GlenPosustaquestionedthevalueoftheinvestmentashefelttheunitsdidn’t appeartobeofthequalitybasedontheamounttobeexpended.Kearney explainedthatthereareotherfactorsthatgointotheinvestmentbesidesthebrick andmortarconstruction.GlenPosustaalsoaskedaboutthetaxvaluationofthe property.ElizabethNesbittexplainedthatitwouldbecommercialproperty subjecttothetaxationrulesinMinnesota. CharlotteGableraskedthemtocommentonwhytheychoseMonticello,being thattheyarefromtheeastcoast.Kearneynotedreasonsincluding:locationon thefreeway,streetscapealong7th StreetWest,currentbusinessdevelopment,job opportunities,andrelativelocationtothemetroarea.CharlotteGableraskedwhy theybuildatownhomestyleratherthanapartmentbuildings.Kearneyexplained thattownhomestendtobebettersuitedforfamiliescomparedtoanapartment building,whichgivesasenseofhome.CharlotteGableraskedabouthowthe CityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page8|11 unitsaremarketed.ElizabethNesbittexplainedthatthetownhomeswouldbe advertisedatmarketrents,notasasubsidizedhousing.Kearneyexplainedthat theseunitsarenotSection8housing;rentsubsidiesarebasedonfamilyincome andfamilysize. KimBretheimofLHBtalkedabouttheCygnetprojectthattheyareplanningand designing.Theywouldplantoextend6½StreetWestintothepropertyandadd pondingfordrainage.Theunitswouldbearrangedtofaceeachotheralong interiorroads,wouldhave2-cargarages,andwouldhavebothfrontandback doors.Therewouldbeacentraloutsideplayareainthecomplex.Thecostofthe developmentwouldincludefundingofreservestosustainoperatingand maintenancecosts.Theyplantousematerialsthatexceedbuildingcode requirements.Hedisplayedpicturesoftwoprojectswhichhavebeenconstructed inAppleValleyandRosemount;thiswouldbesimilartowhattheyintendforthe Monticelloproject.Thoseprojectsweredonewiththesametypeoffinancing plannedforCygnetLanding.Squarefootageofunitsrangefrom1100fora2- bedroomto1500fora3-bedroom,plusa2-cargarage. GlenPosustaaskedaboutprojectsinMinnesota,anditwasconfirmedthatLHB hasmainofficesinDuluth,Minnesotaandisintheprocessofconstructinga numberofvariousprojectsacrossthestate.CharlotteGableraskedJeffO’Neill tocheckreferencesfromotherMinnesotaprojects. TomPerraultaskedif6½Streetiscurrentlyapublicstreet.Staffconfirmedthat andindicatedthatotherinternalstreetsofthedevelopmentwouldbeprivate.All streetdevelopmentcostswillbetheresponsibilityofthedeveloper. CHARLOTTEGABLERFORALTERNATIVE#1TOADOPTRESOLUTION #2015-041AUTHORIZINGALETTEROFSUPPORTFORTHEMONARCH DEVELOPMENTGROUPASRELATEDTOANAFFORDABLE WORKPLACETOWNHOMEDEVELOPMENTONTHEFORMERRUFF PROPERTY(PID155-500-101418).GLENPOSUSTASECONDEDTHE MOTION.MOTIONCARRIED4-1WITHTOMPERRAULTVOTINGIN OPPOSITION. B.Considerationofsupportinganalignmentoptionforthefutureextensionof SchoolBoulevardWesttoCountyRoad39 AngelaSchumannnotedthatCouncilisbeingaskedtoconsiderthealignmentof SchoolBoulevardwestextensionasrelatedtotheBertramChainofLakes parkland.BrianStumpfcommentedthathewouldliketoseeAlternate#1revised toendtheSchoolBoulevardextensionattheSpikeproperty.Thisrevisionwould stillresultindeflectingtheroadsothatitwouldnotberoutedthroughBertram ChainofLakesparkland.Othercouncilmembersindicatedtheiragreementwith thatchange. CityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page9|11 BRIANSTUMPFMOVEDFORALTERNATE#1TOSUPPORTANOPTION FORFUTUREWESTERNEXTENSIONOFSCHOOLBOULEVARDUPTO THESPIKEPROPERTYANDAVOIDAROUTETHROUGHTHE BERTRAMCHAINOFLAKESPARKLAND.GLENPOSUSTASECONDED THEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED4-1WITHTOMPERRAULTVOTING INOPPOSITION. C.ConsiderationofapprovinganoptionfortheFallonAvenueOverpassalignment JeffO’Neillsummarizedthisitemfromdiscussionthattookplaceataworkshop priortotheCouncilmeeting.HeaskedShibaniBissonandChuckRickartto reviewthealignmentoptionssothatCouncilcanselectapreferredoption. ChuckRickartreviewedthestudyprocesswhichstartedwitheightpossible optionsforalignmentoftheFallonAvoverpass.Theoriginaldrawingstarted withasimpledesignforanoverpassacrossI-94thatmetat7th Streetonthenorth andChelseaonthesouth.Discussionsovertimenarrowedtheoptionsto Alternate3AandAlternate5,withAlternate3Arecommendedbythe TransportationAdvisoryCommittee.Alternate3Aincorporatestworoundabouts onthenorthsideofthefreewayalong7th Streetattheintersectionoftheoverpass andattheintersectionofWashingtonStreet.Alternate5utilizesasingle roundaboutonthenorthsideofthefreeway;thisroundaboutformsa4-leg intersectionwith7th Streetontheeastandwestlegs,theoverpassonthesouth leg,andWashington/Fallononthenorthleg.Itisproposedtoincludea roundaboutonthesouthintersectionwithChelseaRoad,butthatisopento adjustment.GlenPosustanotedthathefavorsthesingleroundaboutdesign. BrianStumpfsummarizedafewconcernsthatwerereportedattheworkshop. TransportationAdvisoryCommitteefavorsAlternate3AratherthanAlternate5, althoughaconcernwasexpressedabouttrafficbeingdirectedthroughtwo roundaboutsandthepossibletrafficimpactintheeventthatasecondriver crossingisconstructedatWashingtonStreet.Therewasaconcernexpressed aboutthegradeat7th Streetwhereitapproachestheroundaboutlocatednearthe FallonAvenueoverpass.JeffO’Neillcommentedthatthegradeisactuallyof valuebecausedriversdonotneedtoseevehiclesapproachingfromtheother direction;driversattentionshouldbedirectedatvehiclesalreadyinthe roundabout. LloydHilgartcommentedthatheprefersAlternate3Afortheroundaboutsat7th StreetandtheoverpassandonthesouthsideatChelsea.However,heisnot convincedthataroundaboutisneededatthistimewhere7th Streetintersects WashingtonStreet.BrianStumpfnotedthattheadvantageofincludingthe secondroundaboutatWashingtonatthistimeistoreducetheimpactsof constructionnowandthenagaininthefuturewhenitwouldneedtobe constructed.CharlotteGableralsonotedthattheroundaboutsaresinglelane design. CityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page10|11 CHARLOTTEGABLERMOVEDFORALTERNATIVE#1SELECTING CONCEPTOPTION3AFORTHEFALLONAVENUEOVERPASS ALIGNMENT,CITYPROJECTNO.ZRCFOS.BRIANSTUMPFSECONDED THEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED3-2WITHTOMPERRAULTAND GLENPOSUSTAVOTINGINOPPOSITION. D.ConsiderationofapprovingthesubmissionofaletterofintentforanEDAand/or HRAlevy AngelaSchumanndiscussedtheEDAworkshopthatwasheldpriortothe CouncilmeetingandexplainedthatCouncilisbeingaskedtoauthorize submissionofaletterofintenttoWrightCountyforanon-bindingEDAand/or HRAlevy.Thiswouldnotindicateapprovalofanytypeofalevyatthistime; saidletterwouldsimplyindicateanintenttoproposeanEDAand/orHRAlevyas partofthe2016budgetprocess. CHARLOTTEGABLERMOVEDFORALTERNATIVE#1TOAPPROVE THESUBMISSIONOFALETTEROFINTENTTOWRIGHTCOUNTYFOR ANEDAAND/ORHRALEVYFOR2016.LLOYDHILGARTSECONDED THEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED4-1WITHTOMPERRAULTVOTING INOPPOSITION. 5.AddedItems •Donationdrop-offs:CharlotteGablerandBrianStumpfbothcommentedonthe problemwithpeopledumpingitemsoutsidetheGoodwilldrop-offboxlocatedin theEastviewparkinglot.Goodwillemptiesthecontainerwhenitisfull,butdoes notpickupanyitemsthatarenotacceptedintheirprogram.Theschoolis participatingwithGoodwillthisasafundraiser,andBrianStumpffeelsthatthis shouldbeaddressedwiththeschooldistrict.WayneObergindicatedthathehad heardfromtheschoolandtheyarenotgoingtocontinuethisifitcontinuesto createproblems. •RecyclingCarts:CharlotteGableraskediflargercartsareavailableforrecycling. WayneObergexplainedthatlargercartsarenotpartoftheprogramnow; howeverresidentscanpayanextrafeetohaveanothercart.CharlotteGabler askedifthecitycouldcheckonpossibilityoflargercarts. •Peddlers:CharlotteGableraskedifthepeddlerinformationcouldbepostedon citywebsitewhentheyregisterwiththeCity.CathyShumanexplainedthatis alreadybeingdone. •FriendshipIsland:BrianStumpfaskedcitystafftolookattheviabilityofadding asiteforFriendshipIslandintheformerRiversofHopeofficesuite.Charlotte Gablertalkedabouttheprogramandhowitfunctions;sheexplainedthatthisis notadaycarebutratheradaycampforpreteens.BrianStumpfindicatedthathe hasalreadyaskedcitystafftodoaspaceneedsstudyandwouldliketoinclude CityCouncilMinutes–May26,2015 Page11|11 FriendshipIslandinthatstudy.ConsensusistoreportbacktoCouncilbythefirst meetinginJuly. LloydHilgartaskedwhattheyaredoingrightnowforFriendshipIsland. CharlotteGablerexplainedthatMCCwasusingtheWarehouseRoombutthatis alsousedforalotofotherprograms.TheyhaveutilizedspaceattheSwanRiver School,butarerunningoutofroom. •MCCwristbandexpenditure:BrianStumpfnotedthatlettersofreprimandrelated towristbandpurchasingwereplacedinthefilesoftheMCCDirectorandFinance DirectorandshouldbeconsideredfortheCityAdministrator. MOTIONBYGLENPOSUSTATOPUTALETTEROFREPRIMANDIN THECITYADMINISTRATOR’SPERSONNELFILEREGARDINGTHE PURCHASEOFWRISTBANDSWITHOUTCOUNCILAPPROVALIN EXCESSOFTHEPURCHASINGPOLICYALLOWANCE.TOMPERRAULT SECONDEDTHEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED5-0. BrianStumpfreportedonthePersonnelCommitteerecommendationtoreview thecity’spurchasingpolicytomakesurethatitisclearastowhatisallowedand not.BrianStumpfpointedoutthattheyfoundexpendituresinexcessof$10,000 onregularly-budgeteditems,suchasforsandandsaltpurchases. 6.Adjournment GLENPOSUSTAMOVEDTOADJOURNTHEMEETINGAT8:41P.M.TOM PERRAULTSECONDEDTHEMOTION.MOTIONCARRIED5-0. Recorder:CatherineM.Shuman___ Approved: Attest:___________________________ CityAdministrator CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 1 2A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillregistersforJune8th (WO) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: Citystaffsubmitstheattachedbillregistersandpurchasingcardregistersforapprovalby Council.Thebillregisterscontainallinvoicesprocessedandthepurchasingcard registerscontainallcardpurchasesmadesincethelastCouncilmeeting.SubjecttoMN Statutes,mostinvoicesrequireCouncilapprovalpriortoreleasingchecksforpayment. ThedayfollowingCouncilapproval,paymentswillbereleasedunlessdirected otherwise.AcreditpurchasingagreementandpolicywasapprovedbyCouncilinitially andcardpurchasesmustcomplywiththepolicy. IfCouncilhasnoquestionsorcommentsonthebillandpurchasecardregisters,thesecan beapprovedwiththeconsentagenda.Ifrequested,thisitemcanberemovedfrom consentanddiscussedpriortomakingamotionforapproval. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Noadditionalworkrequired B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovethebillandpurchasecardregistersforatotalamountof $455,686.95. 2.MotiontoapprovetheregisterswithchangesdirectedbyCouncil. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1or#2,perdirectionofCouncil. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Billregisters PurchaseCardregisters User: Printed:06/01/2015 - 10:46AM Debbie.Davidson Computer Check Proof List by Vendor Accounts Payable Batch:00215.05.2015 - 215.05.2015 Xcel Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True 10128 Qrt1 2015 Office Facility 118 6th St W 76.06 05/31/2015 101-41941-438200 10250 Qrt1 2015 Head End Garage 3698 1/2 School Blvd 41.20 05/31/2015 656-49870-438200 5250 Qrt1 2015 Bridge Park West 107 River St W Rm 39.97 05/31/2015 101-45201-438200 7224 Qrt1 2015 WWTP 2,264.09 05/31/2015 602-49480-438200 7885 Qrt1 2015 Help Center 45.12 05/31/2015 217-41990-438200 8086 Qrt1 2015 4th Street Warming House 39.97 05/31/2015 101-45201-438200 8114 Qrt1 2015 Hi-Way Liquor 119.78 05/31/2015 609-49754-438200 8117 Qrt1 2015 MCCr 3,353.22 05/31/2015 226-45122-438200 8119 Qrt 1 2015 Fire Station 55.43 05/31/2015 101-42200-438200 8120 Qrt 1 2015 Bldg Inspection Garage 39.97 05/31/2015 101-41940-438200 8177 Qrt 1 2015 Library 268.61 05/31/2015 101-45501-438200 8631 Qrt 1 2015 203 Chelsea Rd- Animal Shelter 39.97 05/31/2015 101-42700-438200 8673 Qrt 1 2015 Head End Building 41.20 05/31/2015 656-49870-438200 8903 Qrt 1 2015 PW Shop/Clerical 163.72 05/31/2015 101-43127-438200 8904 Qrt 1 2015 PW Vehicle Storage 55.93 05/31/2015 101-43127-438200 8905 Qrt 1 2015 PW Office 39.97 05/31/2015 101-43127-438200 6,684.21Check Total: Vendor:1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 04/30/2015 51-6505915-2 1,115.83 04/30/2015 101-45201-438100 04/30/2015 51-6505915-2 92.62 04/30/2015 101-45203-438100 04/30/2015 51-6505915-2 36.89 04/30/2015 226-45203-438100 04/30/2015 51-6505915-2 300.44 04/30/2015 601-49440-438100 04/30/2015 51-6505906-1 1,216.29 04/30/2015 602-49490-438100 04/30/2015 51-6505914-1 1,142.15 04/30/2015 101-43127-438100 05/31/2015 utx - 51-9069641-8 1,878.95 05/31/2015 656-49877-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505910-7 1,495.77 05/31/2015 609-49754-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505905-0 5,301.93 05/31/2015 601-49440-438100 05/31/2015 51-0395766-0 782.95 05/31/2015 601-49440-438100 05/31/2015 ZCULPS - 51-0623082-8 17.09 05/31/2015 213-46522-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505909-4 145.13 05/31/2015 217-41990-438100 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2015 - 10:46 AM)Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 05/31/2015 51-6505911-8 - MCC 7,611.41 05/31/2015 226-45122-438100 05/31/2015 51-4271112-2 735.57 05/31/2015 101-45501-438100 05/31/2015 51-0371645-4 18.84 05/31/2015 101-45201-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505911-8 - National Guard 197.70 05/31/2015 101-42800-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505907-2 63.94 05/31/2015 101-43140-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505907-2 46.49 05/31/2015 101-43140-438100 05/31/2015 51-4400193-4 17.09 05/31/2015 101-43160-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505916-3 12,447.32 05/31/2015 101-43160-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505911-8 - Senior Center 395.40 05/31/2015 101-45175-438100 05/31/2015 51-9391437-3 188.10 05/31/2015 101-41941-438100 05/31/2015 51-7780310-4 46.84 05/31/2015 101-41940-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505911-8 - City Hall 1,680.44 05/31/2015 101-41940-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505908-3 17.49 05/31/2015 101-42500-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505912-9 76.79 05/31/2015 101-42700-438100 05/31/2015 51-6505912-9 463.73 05/31/2015 101-42200-438100 37,533.19Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 44,217.40 2 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2015 - 10:46 AM)Page 2 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/8/2015 Approved by: ______________________________________ Mayor Brian Stumpf User: Printed:06/03/2015 - 11:30AM Julie.Cheney Computer Check Proof List by Vendor Accounts Payable Batch:00202.06.2015 - 00202.06.2015 AP Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:1020 ALMCO HYDRAULICS INC Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False 16567 Preventative Mtc inspection/baler 139.00 06/09/2015 609-49754-431990 139.00Check Total: Vendor:1038 APPERTS FOOD SERVICE Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 505290709 Freight 5.00 06/09/2015 226-45122-433300 505290709 Pizzas for parties 62.97 06/09/2015 226-45127-421460 505290709 Concession - hot dogs, cookies, muffins, dessert bars, chips, 451.23 06/09/2015 226-45127-425410 519.20Check Total: Vendor:3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 3032091 resale - beer 32.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 3032696 resale - beer 320.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 352.00Check Total: Vendor:1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True 223774 Hoses & Fittings 105.59 06/09/2015 101-43120-422100 105.59Check Total: Vendor:1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True 48361000 resale - liquor 347.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 48361000 resale - wine 398.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 48361000 freight 17.60 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 48454900 resale - liquor 451.17 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 48454900 resale - wine 88.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 48454900 freight 15.41 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 48497500 resale - liquor credit inv. 44041900; 48050300 -57.36 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 1,259.82Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 3105 Resale - Coffee 131.04 06/09/2015 226-45127-425410 93310 Resale - soda pop 89.70 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 93310 Resale - juice 65.60 06/09/2015 609-49750-425500 93311 Resale - beer 1,680.60 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 94078 Resale - pop, water, tea 343.42 06/09/2015 226-45127-425410 96871 Resale - Milk, Pop, Water 331.40 06/09/2015 226-45127-425410 2,641.76Check Total: Vendor:4126 PERRY BONDHUS Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False 5/19/2015 Refund on membership child care 44.91 06/09/2015 226-45122-347900 5/19/2015 Refund on membership child care - sales tax 3.09 06/09/2015 226-00000-208100 48.00Check Total: Vendor:2535 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 909364514 1000 Coax 112.92 06/09/2015 656-49877-421990 909372389 (2) Cybershield 176.06 06/09/2015 656-49877-421990 909379186 (20) SCAPC-SCAPC 161.03 06/09/2015 656-49877-421990 909386316 (3) 810-LL7-030 77.45 06/09/2015 656-49877-421990 909408516 credit- Hi-Density QP Panel -51.17 06/09/2015 656-49877-421990 476.29Check Total: Vendor:3233 C.J.'S LINEN SERVICE Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 31548 Mississippi Room drapes cleaned (4) 90.00 06/09/2015 226-45127-431990 90.00Check Total: Vendor:1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True 2348-001G 92 General - Code Enforcement - April 2015 326.70 06/09/2015 101-42400-430400 326.70Check Total: Vendor:1801 CANNON RIVER WINERY Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True 7810 resale - wine 115.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 115.00Check Total: Vendor:1094 CAREFREE LAWN SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 14641 Lawn Maint- (2) Hillside; (2) Riverside;(2) Ltr/Debris- H.Side 1,420.00 06/09/2015 101-45501-431050 1,420.00Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:1095 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False 11283 resale - wine 576.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 576.00Check Total: Vendor:1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 00042806 Monthly Tank Rental 45.00 06/09/2015 226-45122-441500 00866360 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (450 lbs) 116.00 06/09/2015 226-45122-421600 161.00Check Total: Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False r72010610615128 Voice 5/1-8/2015 - monthly access charge- due date changed 140.00 06/09/2015 656-49879-430910 140.00Check Total: Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False r97006006015128 Voice 5/1-8/2015 - monthly access charge- due date changed 33.66 06/09/2015 656-49879-430910 33.66Check Total: Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False L04003703715128 Voice 5/1-8/2015 - monthly access charge- due date changed 27.51 06/09/2015 656-49879-430910 27.51Check Total: Vendor:2476 CSI DIGITAL INC Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 103054 1 Gbps monthly fiber feed - June 2015 2,700.00 06/09/2015 656-49879-430930 2,700.00Check Total: Vendor:1092 CSI SOFTWARE INC Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True 29174 Monthly Software Fee - July 2015 466.47 06/09/2015 226-45122-430910 466.47Check Total: Vendor:1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True 109161 resale - n/a beer 42.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 109161 resale - beer 19,939.70 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 109477 resale - beer 28,385.84 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 109477 resale - n/a beer 124.70 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 109592 resale - beer credit -102.60 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 109593 resale - beer 216.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 109843 resale - beer - softball fields 89.00 06/09/2015 226-45203-425200 109856 resale - beer - softball fields 238.00 06/09/2015 226-45203-425200 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1140937 resale - beer 254.60 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 1156468 resale - beer 403.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 1156495 resale - n/a beer 65.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 1156495 resale - beer 17,572.75 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 67,228.49Check Total: Vendor:1134 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True 802860 resale - beer 4,217.40 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 802860 resale - beer N/A 49.20 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 803863 resale - beer 1,206.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 803863 resale - N/A beer 21.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 804779 resale - beer 3,112.65 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 8,607.25Check Total: Vendor:1151 EARL F ANDERSEN INC Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False 0107780 Meeting tables - 30x96 (6) 3,911.92 06/09/2015 226-45122-424600 3,911.92Check Total: Vendor:1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: True 221085 PHN - PHN Monti Union Crossing - Ad# 395649 110.76 06/09/2015 101-41910-435100 221086 XSOLAR - PHN Zo Ord Ch 5 & 8 - Ad# 395650 110.76 06/09/2015 101-41910-435100 221087 PHN - Zo Ord Ch 5 & 8 Acc - Ad# 395653 110.76 06/09/2015 101-41910-435100 222244 Farmers Market Ad# 395855 65.00 06/09/2015 226-45127-434990 397.28Check Total: Vendor:3681 STERLING EGAN Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 5/19/2015 Referee Mens Hockey - 1 game - 5/18/15 35.00 06/09/2015 226-45127-430160 5/29/2015 Referee Mens Hockey - 2 games - 5/20/15 70.00 06/09/2015 226-45127-430160 105.00Check Total: Vendor:4132 GILLES ELANE Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 06022015 FNM-001-0502 acct. Refund 27.73 06/09/2015 656-00000-115025 27.73Check Total: Vendor:1167 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False 264-912 resale - rootbeer 104.70 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 104.70Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:4137 SARAH FRITSCH Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 6/2/2015 Friendship Island staff workship on child discipline & behavior 225.00 06/09/2015 226-45122-433200 225.00Check Total: Vendor:4090 GOLDEN WEST TECHNOLOGIES Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False 150510451 5/1-5/31/2015 - Video Support Usage- After Hours Tech Support 645.75 06/09/2015 656-49870-431990 645.75Check Total: Vendor:1206 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False 181604 resale - wine 300.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 181604 freight 15.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 315.00Check Total: Vendor:4140 H2O PRO LLC Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False 6/3/2015 Refund on permit issued in error 100.00 06/09/2015 101-42400-322110 100.00Check Total: Vendor:1241 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: True 010-032-2 Comp Plan Update w/2014 amendment 249.00 06/09/2015 101-41910-431990 249.00Check Total: Vendor:1242 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: True 05182015 Fire Dept. Fuel slips 4/24-5/17/2015 396.50 06/09/2015 101-42200-421200 396.50Check Total: Vendor:1244 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False 150430012 Pool chemicals 139.95 06/09/2015 226-45122-421600 139.95Check Total: Vendor:3356 INDIAN ISLAND WINERY Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: False 2570 resale - wine 481.92 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 481.92Check Total: Vendor:2208 INITIATIVE FOUNDATION Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: False 6/1/2015 VISTA intern for Farmers Market 400.00 06/09/2015 226-45127-421981 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 400.00Check Total: Vendor:3971 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGINEERS LOCAL 49 FRINGE BENE Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False July 2015 July Health Insurance 48,000.00 06/09/2015 101-00000-217061 July 2015 July Health Insurance 12,720.00 06/09/2015 101-00000-217061 60,720.00Check Total: Vendor:1256 J&W INSTRUMENT INC Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False 3008748 (10) Eurotherm-Chessell Charts 524.01 06/09/2015 601-49440-422700 524.01Check Total: Vendor:1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False 2368248 resale - beer 1,075.71 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 2368248 freight 3.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 1,078.71Check Total: Vendor:3855 JOANNE C JOHNSON Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False May1 BLANDN - Billing period May 2015 3,000.00 06/09/2015 656-00000-220250 3,000.00Check Total: Vendor:1263 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False 5161246 resale - liquor 148.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 5161246 freight 2.88 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 5161247 freight 50.39 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 5161247 resale - wine 2,213.75 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 5162500 resale - liquor 2,968.17 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 5162500 freight 31.92 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 5162501 freight 66.95 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 5162501 resale - wine 2,138.28 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 5162501 resale - N/A wine 118.70 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 5162502 resale - beer 87.96 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 5164022 freight 38.28 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 5164022 resale - liquor 3,208.01 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 5164023 resale - wine 2,143.85 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 5164023 resale - mix 28.49 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 5164023 freight 55.20 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 5164024 resale - beer 78.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 5166859 freight 1.44 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 5166859 resale - liquor 72.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 5169875 freight 20.14 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 5169875 resale - liquor 2,239.40 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 5169876 resale - mix 28.49 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 5169876 freight 1.44 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 5169877 freight 41.75 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 5169877 resale - liquor 3,074.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 5169878 freight 34.55 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 5169878 resale - wine 1,822.40 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 5169879 resale - beer 541.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 526213 freight -1.20 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 526213 resale - liquor credit -63.75 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 526214 resale - liquor credit -12.75 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 526215 resale - wine credit -13.15 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 526382 resale - liquor credit -2.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 526383 resale - winecredit -9.71 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 526384 resale - wine credit -26.30 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 21,127.08Check Total: Vendor:1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False MN190-00101 Apr General EDA Matters through 4/30/15 684.50 06/09/2015 213-46301-430400 MN190-00147 Apr BLK034 - TIF District through 4/30/15 280.25 06/09/2015 213-46301-430400 964.75Check Total: Vendor:4131 RUTH KIVIAHDE Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False 06022015 FNM-001-0368 acct. Refund 22.55 06/09/2015 656-00000-115025 22.55Check Total: Vendor:4092 JEROME KLEIS Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 5/19/2015 Referee Mens Hockey - 2 games 5/18/15 70.00 06/09/2015 226-45127-430160 70.00Check Total: Vendor:4076 NICHOLAS KLINKHAMMER Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 5/29/2015 Referee Mens Hockey Games - 5/20 (2) & 5/27 (1) 105.00 06/09/2015 226-45127-430160 105.00Check Total: Vendor:2626 HARRY LANTTO Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: True 5/29/2015 Planning Commission Meeting Recording - 5/5/15 60.00 06/09/2015 101-41910-431990 5/29/2015 EDA Meeting Recording - 5/13/15 60.00 06/09/2015 213-46301-431990 5/29/2015 City Council Meeting Recording - 5/11/15 & 5/26/15 130.00 06/09/2015 101-41110-431990 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 250.00Check Total: Vendor:2304 LEGACY MECHANICAL SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: True 4699 Labor install venting & gas piping for spa heaters 1,041.60 06/09/2015 226-45122-440440 4699 Materials for install venting & gas piping for spa heaters 186.00 06/09/2015 226-45122-440440 1,227.60Check Total: Vendor:1292 LEROY JOB TRUCKING INC Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 17361 Animal Charge (7) 81.90 06/09/2015 101-42700-431990 81.90Check Total: Vendor:4133 SHAWN LUCAS Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False 06022015 FNM-001-0075 acct Refund 31.10 06/09/2015 656-00000-115025 31.10Check Total: Vendor:4081 M & P SIGN CO Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False 8936 Metal signs 30x24 "For Sale for Development" (1/2) 59.00 06/09/2015 213-46301-431990 8936 Metal signs 30x24 "For Sale for Development" (1/2) 59.00 06/09/2015 101-41940-431990 118.00Check Total: Vendor:1303 M AMUNDSON LLP Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: True 195979 resale - soda pop; cork screws; can coolers; etc 393.36 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 195979 resale - cigarettes 536.76 06/09/2015 609-49750-425500 930.12Check Total: Vendor:1308 MARCO INC Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: True 278648191 5/10-6/10-15 Contract 4,923.39 06/09/2015 702-00000-441500 4,923.39Check Total: Vendor:2852 MIDWEST BUSINESS PROMOTIONS INC Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: True 11472 (1000) Executive Javalina Pens 524.65 06/09/2015 609-49754-421990 524.65Check Total: Vendor:2179 MINNESOTA 9-1-1 PROGRAM Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: True May-15 May 2015 - 911 Wright Co. 780.53 06/09/2015 656-00000-208170 780.53Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:1932 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT CO Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: False 762216 (6) DNO Spiralok - W. Bridge; Sunset Ponds; Groveland parks 383.63 06/09/2015 101-45201-440800 383.63Check Total: Vendor:1341 MMKR Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: True 37944 Progress Billing - services through 4/30/15 6,500.00 06/09/2015 101-41540-430100 6,500.00Check Total: Vendor:4138 MONTICELLO LIONS Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: False 6/2/2015 Return donation - for Fire Relief Association 100.00 06/09/2015 101-42200-362300 100.00Check Total: Vendor:1375 MONTICELLO PRINTING INC Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: True 5/21/2015 Self Inking Stamp 39.00 06/09/2015 101-42400-421990 39.00Check Total: Vendor:1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False 1012306 check valve kit 107.12 06/09/2015 101-45201-422100 1012896 check valve kit 110.16 06/09/2015 101-45201-422100 1012897 check valve kit - credit -95.42 06/09/2015 101-45201-422100 121.86Check Total: Vendor:1419 PAN O GOLD CO ST CLOUD Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: True 010004513610 Resale - buns (9 pkgs) 15.66 06/09/2015 226-45127-425410 010004513610 Resale - buns (9 pkgs) 15.66 06/09/2015 226-45203-425410 31.32Check Total: Vendor:1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 8498942 resale - wine 494.95 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 8498942 freight 10.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 8499879 resale - wine 1,414.44 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 8499879 freight 22.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 1,942.39Check Total: Vendor:1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: False 212890 resale - wine credit -5.83 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 2788078 resale - liquor 445.70 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 2788078 freight 8.64 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2788079 resale - wine 3,205.05 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 2788079 freight 71.99 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 2788859 freight 36.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 2788859 resale - liquor 2,763.35 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 2788860 resale - wine 4,468.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 2788860 freight 137.51 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 2789786 freight 38.35 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 2789786 resale - liquor 3,540.68 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 2789787 resale - wine 1,084.75 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 2789787 resale - wine n/a 112.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 2789787 freight 26.64 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 2791710 freight 80.65 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 2791710 resale - liquor 3,597.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 2793574 resale - liquor 6,103.74 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 2793574 freight 79.19 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 2793575 freight 27.36 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 2793575 resale - wine 670.25 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 26,492.02Check Total: Vendor:1443 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False 30470 Chestnut Lift Station - (4) KSB Profile gasket 280.00 06/09/2015 602-49490-422100 280.00Check Total: Vendor:3721 MICHAEL REASONER Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False 5/19/2015 Referee Mens Hockey 1 game 5/18/15 35.00 06/09/2015 226-45127-430160 35.00Check Total: Vendor:4129 MIKE ROGERS Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: True 05/28/2015 Boot Reimbursement - Mike R 90.00 06/09/2015 101-43120-420650 90.00Check Total: Vendor:1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: True 6/3/2015 Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 06/09/2015 101-42700-431200 1,593.75Check Total: Vendor:4130 MARLIEN SASS Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False 06022015 FNM-001-08223 acct refund 11.59 06/09/2015 656-00000-115025 11.59Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:4127 SCHILLEWAERT LANDSCAPING & TREE SERVICE, INC Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False 127727 Planting Maple Tree Hunters Crossing - AMCON BLOCK to pay 825.70 06/09/2015 101-43120-431990 825.70Check Total: Vendor:2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False W4796982 Security Officer - 5-1-15 Wine Tasting Event 119.70 06/09/2015 609-49754-425550 119.70Check Total: Vendor:1485 SENTRY SYSTEMS INC Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: True 05/21/2015 Security system cancellation fee 15.00 06/09/2015 101-43110-431900 15.00Check Total: Vendor:2497 SHERBURNE WRIGHT CABLE COMMISSION Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: True 6/2/2015 Cable Franchise Fees - FNM Qtr 2 2015 7,081.16 06/09/2015 656-00000-208300 7,081.16Check Total: Vendor:1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False 894131 May 2015 Cleaning Service 100.00 06/09/2015 101-42200-431990 100.00Check Total: Vendor:3309 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF MINNESOTA Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: False 1284920 resale - wine 4,214.88 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 1284920 freight 74.26 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 1287329 resale - liquor 2,947.42 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 1287329 freight 27.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 1287330 freight 27.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 1287330 resale - wine 1,633.55 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 1289601 resale - liquor 855.56 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 1289601 freight 8.10 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 1289602 freight 31.05 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 1289602 resale - wine 1,686.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 11,504.82Check Total: Vendor:1497 SPECTRUM SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: True 252604 (6) kitchen towels 12/210ct - PW 152.28 06/09/2015 101-43127-421100 252604 (20) Starlite Grey; (12)32oz spryrr; (12) 9.25" spryr; etc -Prk 174.08 06/09/2015 101-45201-421650 326.36Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:2564 SPORTS PRO LLC Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: True 358 Labor - Qtrly Preventative Maint (13) Treadmills (11) Elliptical 545.00 06/09/2015 226-45122-431900 545.00Check Total: Vendor:4136 PAUL & MARY STERBUCK Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: False 06022015 FNM-001-0271 acct Refund 113.24 06/09/2015 656-00000-115025 113.24Check Total: Vendor:3829 STEVE'O'SEPTIC Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: True May 2015 (12) Porta Toilet Rentals - full month 597.00 06/09/2015 101-45201-431990 597.00Check Total: Vendor:1516 TASC Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False IN547728 7/1/2015-7/31/2015 Admin Fees 66.56 06/09/2015 101-49240-413500 66.56Check Total: Vendor:3608 TELESPHERE SOFTWARE INC Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False 4941-DM The balance from May 2015- cust, pd. us rather than Telesphere 129.52 06/09/2015 656-49870-431990 129.52Check Total: Vendor:1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: True 00756428 resale - beer 20,910.18 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 893832 resale - beer 13,456.44 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 895361 resale - wine 25.10 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 895362 resale - N/A beer 115.65 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 895363 resale - beer 14,422.35 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 896436 resale - beer 444.85 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 896437 resale - beer N/A 62.80 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 896504 resale - beer 288.05 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 896504 resale - beer N/A 76.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 896521 resale - beer credit -69.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-425200 49,731.92Check Total: Vendor:3594 TRIMARK Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False 2426409 resale 34.74 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 2426409 (6) asst. bags; coffee filter, etc 201.35 06/09/2015 609-49754-421990 2426409 freight 7.80 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 243.89Check Total: Vendor:1534 TWIN CITIES FLAG SOURCE INC Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False 28057 (2) 5x8 USA nylon I flag 133.59 06/09/2015 609-49754-421990 133.59Check Total: Vendor:1537 UHL COMPANY INC Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: True 34929 Issues w/energy mgmt program: java & graphics 1,205.00 06/09/2015 226-45122-440440 1,205.00Check Total: Vendor:1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV LLC VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATIONS INC Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False 00048698 July 2015 WWTP Operation & Maintenance 79,823.00 06/09/2015 602-49480-430800 79,823.00Check Total: Vendor:1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: True 1570644 resale - soda pop 430.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 1570786 resale - soda pop 166.25 06/09/2015 609-49750-425400 596.25Check Total: Vendor:1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: True 0124881 freight 12.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 0124881 resale - wine 436.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 0125337 freight 7.50 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 0125337 resale - wine 336.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 792.50Check Total: Vendor:4135 KIM WALLIN Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False 06022015 FNM-001-0470 acct. Refund 50.02 06/09/2015 656-00000-115025 50.02Check Total: Vendor:3683 BRADLEY WEBER Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: True 5/29/2015 Referee Mens Hockey - 5/27/15 - 1 game 35.00 06/09/2015 226-45127-430160 35.00Check Total: Vendor:1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False 7195 Materials - Lift rental for light repairs in Mississippi room 75.00 06/09/2015 226-45122-440100 7195 Labor - Light repairs in Mississippi room 300.00 06/09/2015 226-45122-440100 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 7199 Materials- Repair on Gazebo Wiring- W. Bridge Park 115.94 06/09/2015 101-45201-443910 7199 Labor - Repair on Gazebo Wiring- W. Bridge Park 227.50 06/09/2015 101-45201-443910 7200 Materials - Freeze stat - special order 165.00 06/09/2015 226-45122-440440 7200 Labor - repair air handler unit; replace freeze stat 162.50 06/09/2015 226-45122-440440 7212 Labor - Instl. Pedestal Pioneer Park. Prep for future lines-West 650.00 06/09/2015 101-45201-431990 7212 Materials- Instl. Pedestal Pioneer Park. Prep for future line 609.20 06/09/2015 101-45201-431990 7212 Inspection- Instl. Pedestal Pioneer Park. Prep for future line 45.00 06/09/2015 101-45201-431990 2,350.14Check Total: Vendor:1756 WIGEN COMPANIES INC Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False 18757 Water softner repair and maintenance 1,406.95 06/09/2015 226-45122-440440 1,406.95Check Total: Vendor:2651 WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: True 23311 Acquistioin & Relocation Consultant Services - Dahlke Property 592.50 06/09/2015 213-46301-431990 592.50Check Total: Vendor:1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: True 393147 resale - wine 2,620.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 393147 freight 37.95 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 2,657.95Check Total: Vendor:1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: False 7030236 freight 23.04 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 7030236 resale - wine 1,204.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 7030477 resale - wine 1,200.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 7030477 freight 15.84 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 7031231 freight 41.76 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 7031231 resale - wine 1,440.25 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 7031765 freight 2.88 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 7031765 resale - wine 138.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 4,065.77Check Total: Vendor:1209 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE & SPIRITS Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: False 1080323834 reale - liquor 4,189.02 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 1080323834 reale - wine 1,508.78 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 1080323834 freight 90.91 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 1080326499 reale - liquor 4,947.06 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 1080326499 reale - wine 984.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 14 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1080326499 freight 74.13 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 1080329105 reale - liquor 4,631.65 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 1080329105 reale - wine 1,088.74 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 1080329105 freight 72.61 06/09/2015 609-49750-433300 2080088437 reale - liquor credit -186.09 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 2080088438 reale - liquor credit -40.75 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 2080088439 reale - liquor credit -27.51 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 2080088440 reale - liquor credit -199.49 06/09/2015 609-49750-425100 17,133.06Check Total: Vendor:4134 RICK & LONNA WOLFSTELLER Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: False 06022015 FNM-001-0028 acct. Refund 41.51 06/09/2015 656-00000-115025 41.51Check Total: Vendor:2573 WOODLAND HILL VINEYARDS LLC Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: False 1613 resale - wine 153.00 06/09/2015 609-49750-425300 153.00Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 411,469.55 95 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/03/2015 - 11:30 AM)Page 15 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/8/15 Approved by________________________________________ Mayor Brian Stumpf CityCouncilAgenda:06/08/15 1 2B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments (TE) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheCouncilisaskedtoratifythehiringanddeparturesofemployeesthathaveoccurred recentlyinthedepartmentslisted.ItisrecommendedthattheCouncilofficiallyratifythe hiring/departureofalllistedemployeesincludingpart-timeandseasonalworkers. A1.BudgetImpact:(positionsaregenerallyincludedinbudget) A2.StaffWorkLoadImpact:Ifnewpositions,theremaybesometraining involved.Ifterminatedpositions,existingstaffwouldpickupthosehours,as needed,untilreplaced. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoratifythehire/departuresoftheemployeesasidentifiedontheattached list. 2.Motiontodenytherecommendedhiresanddepartures. C.RECOMMENDATION: BystatutetheCityCouncilhastheauthoritytoapproveallhires/departures.Citystaff recommendsAlternative#1,fortheCounciltoapprovethehiresand/ordeparturesas listed. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Listofnew/terminatedemployees Name Title Department Hire Date Class Noelle Berg Guest Service 2 MCC 5/23/2015 PT Natalie Seyko Guest Service 2 MCC 5/24/2015 PT Sydney Cottrell Guest Service 2 MCC 5/26/2015 PT Amanda Campbell Slide Attendant MCC 5/26/2015 PT Aysia Romer Life Guard MCC 5/31/2015 PT Katie DeVries Slide Attendant MCC 5/31/15 PT Sarah Renslow Friendship Island MCC 6/1/2015 PT Joseph Schultz Friendship Island MCC 6/1/15 PT Name Reason Department Last Day Class Terae DeMarais Voluntary MCC 3/20/15 PT Jennifer Jungroth Involuntary MCC 5/7/15 PT Christian Sipe Voluntary MCC 5/8/15 PT Melanie Rasmussen Voluntary MCC 5/22/15 PT Michael Guyse Voluntary MCC 5/24/15 PT Noah Haaland Voluntary MCC 5/26/15 PT Anna Davidson Voluntary MCC 5/17/15 PT Sydney Cottrell Involuntary MCC 5/28/15 PT NEW EMPLOYEES TERMINATING EMPLOYEES New Hire and Terms City Council 2015: 6/3/2015 CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 1 2C.ConsiderationofappointingrepresentativestotheMonticelloPlanningCommission tofillavacanciesfortermstoexpire12/31/15and12/31/16 (AS/TE) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: CityCouncilisaskedtoappointJohnFalenschekandMarcSimpsontopositionsonthe MonticelloPlanningCommissiontofilltermstoexpire12/31/15and12/31/16 respectively.AlanHeidemannandAmberKramerpreviouslyheldthesepositions. Thevacantpositionswereadvertisedtothepublicandinterviewswereheldbythe PlanningCommissiononMay5,2015andonJune2,2015.Otherapplicantsforthe Commissionwillbenotifiedandtheirapplicationskeptonfileforfutureopeningsonthis orotherCityboards. CouncilwillnotethatMr.Falenschekisapart-timeemployeeoftheMonticello CommunityCenter.Mr.FalenschekteacheskarateclassesattheMCC. ThePlanningCommissionrecommendedFalenschek’sandSimpson’sappointmentsto theCommissioninaunanimous3-0vote. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: Decision1: 1.MotiontorecommendthattheCityCouncilapprovetheappointmentofJohn FalenschektotheMonticelloPlanningCommissionwithatermtoexpire 12/31/15. 2.Motiontodenytheappointment. Decision2: 1.MotiontorecommendthattheCityCouncilapprovetheappointmentofMarc SimpsontotheMonticelloPlanningCommissionwithatermtoexpire12/31/16. 2.Motiontodenytheappointment. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CityStaffandtheMonticelloPlanningCommissionrecommendAlternative#1for Decisions1and2. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Application–JohnFalenschek(redacted) Application–MarcSimpson(redacted) Application–SteveReishus(redacted) CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 2 CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 1 2D.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-042acceptingacontributionfrom CargillKitchenSolutionsforflowerplantingsonBroadwayWestmedian (TM) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: CargillKitchenSolutionswishestocontribute$500towardtheflowerplantingsonthe BroadwayWestmedian.TheflowerswereplantedonMay21st,2015. Themedianhasbeenlookingbeautifulforanumberofyearsthankstothefinancial contributionfromCargillKitchenSolutions,andtheplantingandmaintenancebyBarb BrionofMartiesFarmService.Citystaffhavereceivedmanycomplimentsonhow beautifulthisarealooksinthesummer. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffaccountsforandreconcilesdonationscontributed throughtheCity. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovethecontributionandauthorizeuseoffundsasspecified. 2.Motiontodenythecontributionandreturnthefundstothedonor. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsadoptingResolution#2015-042toacceptthedonationof$500 fromCargillKitchenSolutionsfortheflowerplantingsontheBroadwayWestmedian. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2015-042 Contributionform CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2015-042 ACCEPTINGCONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS,theCityofMonticelloisgenerallyauthorizedtoaccept contributionsofrealandpersonalpropertypursuanttoMinnesotaStatutesSections 465.03and465.04forthebenefitofitscitizensandisspecificallyauthorizedtomaintain suchpropertyforthebenefitofitscitizensinaccordancewiththetermsprescribedbythe donor.SaidgiftsmaybelimitedunderprovisionsofMNStatutesSection471.895. WHEREAS,thefollowingpersonsandorentitieshaveofferedtocontribute contributionsorgiftstotheCityaslisted: DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION VALUE CargillKitchenSolutions Cash $500 WHEREAS,allsaidcontributionsareintendedtoaidtheCityinestablishing facilities,operationsorprogramswithinthecity’sjurisdictioneitheraloneorin cooperationwithothers,asallowedbylaw;and WHEREAS,theCityCouncilherebyfindsthatitisappropriatetoacceptthe contributionsoffered. NOWTHEREFOREBEITRESOLVED bytheCityCouncilofMonticelloas follows: 1.ThecontributionsdescribedaboveareherebyacceptedbytheCityof Monticello. 2.Thecontributionsdescribedabovewillbeusedasdesignatedbythe donor.Thismayentailreimbursingorallocatingthemoneytoanother entitythatwillutilizethefundsforthefollowingstatedpurpose: DONOR/ENTITY RECIPIENT PURPOSE CargillKitchenSolutions CityofMonticello Flowers AdoptedbytheCityCouncilofMonticellothis8thdayofJune,2015. CITYOFMONTICELLO ______________________________ BrianStumpf,Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ KerryBurri,InterimCityClerk CityCouncilAgenda:06/08/15 1 2E.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-043acceptingacontributionfromthe MonticelloLionstotheStreetDepartmentfortrafficcontroldevices (TM) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheMonticelloLionswishtocontribute$490towardsthepurchaseoftrafficcontrol devices(barricades&cones)fortheMonticelloStreetDepartment. Throughouttheyearsatvariouscommunityevents,theStreetDepartmenthasassisted theMonticelloLionswithprovidingtrafficcontrol,barricades,cones,signs,etc.The LionshaveexpressedtheirgratitudetotheCityandwishtocontributeasawayofsaying thanksandgivingbacktotheCityfortheirassistance. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffaccountsforandreconcilesdonationscontributed throughtheCity. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovethecontributionandauthorizeuseoffundsasspecified. 2.Motiontodenythecontributionandreturnthefundstothedonor. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsadoptingResolution#2015-043toacceptthedonationof$490 fromtheMonticelloLionsforthepurchaseoftrafficcontroldevicesfortheMonticello StreetDepartment. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2015-043 ContributionForm CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-043 ACCEPTING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION VALUE Monticello Lions Cash $490 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city’s jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY RECIPIENT PURPOSE Monticello Lions City of Monticello Traffic Control Devices ADOPTED BY the City Council of Monticello this 8th day of June, 2015. CITY OF MONTICELLO ______________________________ Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Kerry Burri, Interim City Clerk CityCouncilAgenda:06/08/15 1 2F.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-047acceptingacontributionfromthe MonticelloLionstotheParksDepartmentforkiosksignage (TM) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheMonticelloLionswishtocontribute$1,575towardsthepurchaseofthreekiosksigns tobeinstalledatEllisonPark,WestBridgeParkandPioneerPark. ThroughouttheyearstheMonticelloLionshaveworkedwiththeMonticelloParks Departmentonvariousparkprojectsincluding,concessionstands,picnicshelters,etc. TheLionshostmanyeventsintheparksincludingtheirannualBrewfestinWestBridge ParkandvariousRiverfesteventsatEllisonPark,PioneerParkandWestBridgePark, justtonameafew.TheParksDepartmentassiststheLionsattheseeventsandtheLions wishtocontributeasawayofsayingthanksandgivingbacktotheCityfortheir assistance. A1.BudgetImpact:None. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffaccountsforandreconcilesdonationscontributed throughtheCity. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovethecontributionandauthorizeuseoffundsasspecified. 2.Motiontodenythecontributionandreturnthefundstothedonor. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsadoptingResolution#2015-047toacceptthedonationof$1,575 fromtheMonticelloLionsforthepurchaseofkiosksignagetobeusedinthreedifferent parklocations. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2015-047 ContributionForm Kiosksignspecifications CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-047 ACCEPTING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION VALUE Monticello Lions Cash $1,575 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city’s jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY RECIPIENT PURPOSE Monticello Lions City of Monticello Kiosk Signage for Parks Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 8th day of June, 2015. CITY OF MONTICELLO ______________________________ Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Kerry Burri, Interim City Clerk CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 1 2G.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-046approvingtheFinalPlatand DevelopmentAgreementfortheVineStreetPlaceatwo-lotsubdivisioninanR-2 (SingleandTwoFamilyResidence)Districtandapprovalofencroachmentagreement. Applicant:Benoit,Patrick(AS) Property:Legal:Seeplatdocuments PID:155010022010 Address:VicinityofVineStreet,5th Street PlanningCaseNumber:2014-031,ZZVINE A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND Request(s):FinalPlatapproval,includingdevelopmentagreement. Previousfinalplatapprovalvoidduetofailuretorecord within100days.Relatedencroachmentagreementalso includedforapproval. LandUseDesignation:PlacestoLive ZoningDesignation:R-2SingleandTwoFamilyResidenceDistrict ThepurposeoftheR-2SingleandTwoFamilyResidence Districtistoprovideforlowtomoderatedensityoneand twounitdwellingsanddirectlyrelatedcomplementary uses. CurrentSiteUse:Vacant/undeveloped SurroundingLandUses: North:SingleFamilyHomes/PlacestoLive(R-2) East:SingleFamilyHomes/PlacestoLive(R-2) South:RailroadTracks West:SingleFamily/TwoFamilyHomes/PlacestoLive(R-2) ProjectDescription:PatrickBenoitofBenoitProperties,LLCisseeking approvalofFinalPlat,basedonavariancefrom subdivisionstandardstocreatealotwithnostreetfrontage grantedbythePlanningCommissiononJuly1,2014.The purposeofthesubdivisionistoconstructaback-to-back duplexutilizingazerolotlinetodividetheproperties.The parcelontheeast(Lot2)hasnodirectstreetaccessand willaccesstheVineStreetcul-de-sacviaashareddriveway withthelotonthewest(Lot1). CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 2 ANALYSIS ThefinalplatforVineStreetPlaceispresentedforre-considerationbytheCityCouncil. Thepreviousfinalplatapprovalisconsideredvoid,asthefinalplatwasnotsubmittedfor recordingatWrightCountywithintherequired100daysfromthetimeofCouncil’s approvalofthefinalplat.ThisisarequirementoftheCity’ssubdivisionordinance.The applicanthadtheoptiontorequestanextensionwithinthe100daysandwasadvisedof theextensionopportunity,butdidnotchoosetoextendatthattime.Therefore,anew applicationforfinalplatconsiderationisrequired.Aspartofthatapplication,theCouncil isaskedtowaivetheapplicationfeeof$50andescrowof$1,200,asthisisa reconsiderationduetoexpirationofthepriorapproval. Subdivision.Thefinalplatdocumentcontinuestoillustratetheplattingofapproximately 0.36acres(15,682squarefeet)intotworesidentiallots.ThepropertyiszonedR-2 SingleandTwoFamilyResidenceDistrict.Thesiteiscurrentlyundevelopedandis adjacenttoexistingsinglefamilyhomestothenorthandeast,theVineStreetcul-de-sac onthewest,andrailroadtrackstothesouth.Theapprovedpreliminaryplatcreatestwo lotsforthepurposesofconstructingaback-to-backduplex.Thecombinedlotarea exceedsthebasedistrictminimumof12,000squarefeetincompliancewithZoning OrdinanceSection3.4(B)(1)(a). PublicStreetAccess.Thefinalplatre-dedicatesVineStreetaspublicrightofway.The portionofVineStreetfrontingLot1,Block1oftheproposedplatwaspreviously vacatedbytheCity.Theadjoiningneighboringownerstothewest,JamesandKaye Eisele,willjoinintheplatastheyowntheunderlyingpropertyforthededicationarea. Lot1willgainaccessdirectlyfromthispublicstreet.Lot2willgainaccesstothepublic streetperthevariancetozoningandsubdivisionrequirementsforlotfrontage,whichwas previouslyapprovedforLot2.ThatvarianceisvaliduntilJuly1,2015andwas contingentontheexecutionandrecordingofarequiredprivateeasementdocumentfor access. Easements.Drainageandutilityeasementshavebeenindicatedaroundtheperimeterof thelots,withtheexceptionofthezerolotlineparcelboundary.A12footdrainageand utilityeasementwillbededicatedalongthenorth(side)lotlineattherequestofthecity, asthereisnodrainageandutilityeasementalongtherearlotlinesoftheparcelstothe north.A6’easementisproposedalongthesouthlineoftheplat. Twoeasementencroachmentsaredepictedontheproposedsiteplanfortheduplex:a patioareaforLot2andthesouthernedgeofthecurbeddrivewayapproximately3feet fromthesouthproperty.Aneasementencroachmentagreementmustbefiledwiththe propertywhentheplatisrecorded. TheapplicanthasaddressedtheExhibitZconditionsforpreliminaryandfinalplatas approvedonAugust11th,2014asfollows: CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 3 1.Acrossaccesseasementagreementmustbeestablishedandfiledwiththecountyto provideaccessfromLot2acrossLot1totheVineStreetcul-de-sac.Thecross accesseasementshouldbewrittentoincludereferencetoutilityprovisioncrossing theprivatelotlines.Acrosseasementagreementdocumenthasbeenprovidedby theapplicantforaccess.Atthistime,thedocumentdoesnotincludethecrossing ofpropertylineswithutilitiesandrequiresrevisiontoinclude.Therevised documentissubjecttoreviewoftheCityAttorneyandproofofrecordingofthe easementwillberequiredpriortobuildingpermit. 2.Theapplicantshallspecifyhowlong-termmaintenanceandcapitalimprovements willbeprovidedforbetweenthetwoparcels.Aseparatedocumentfortheseitems hasbeendraftedandsubmittedtotheCity. 3.Thesharedwallfacingonthezerolotlinemustbeastructuralwallmeetingbuilding codeandpropertylinerequirements.Conditionapplicable;reviewedatbuilding permit. 4.Additionallandscaping,suchasashrubborder,shallbeinstalledalongthenorth propertylinetoprovideadditionalvisualbufferingforthesideyardoftheduplexand therearyardsoftheadjoiningresidentialparcels.Arborvitaeandspireaplantings havebeenaddedalongthenorthsideoftheunitsontherevisedrecordlandscaping plan. 5.ExteriorfinishmaterialsonthewestsideoftheduplexonLot1musthaveatleast20 percentofthefaçadeconsistingofbrick,stone,orculturedmasonrysimulatingthese materials.Theapplicanthasprovidedarecordplanillustratingtheadditionof brickorstoneonthewestsideoftheduplexonLot1.Thisrequirementwillalsobe verifiedatbuildingpermit. 6.Executionofanencroachmentagreementforimprovementsinthepubliceasements. AnencroachmentagreementisincludedforCouncilreviewandapproval. 7.Executionofadevelopmentagreementgoverningrequirementsandimprovementsin theplat.ThedevelopmentagreementisincludedforCouncilreviewandapproval andisdiscussedinmoredetailbelow. 8.RecommendationsoftheCityEngineerrelatingtograding,drainage,utilities,and stormwatermanagement.Itshouldbenotedthatinrecordpreliminaryplatplans submittedtotheCity,theapplicanthasrevisedthesiteandgradingplansto illustrateareduceddrivewaywidthandgradingplanwhicheliminatescurbing alongthedrivewayanddirectsdrainageacrossthedrivewaydirectlytotheexisting stormwatersysteminVineStreet.Theapplicanthasalsosubmittedarevised utilityplanwhichindicatesthattheywillnotremovetheadditionalthirdwater service.TheCityEngineerandWater&SewerSuperintendentrecommend abandoningthewaterservicebyclosingtheconnectionwheretheserviceintersects themaininthestreetandalsoremovingthestandpipeintheboulevard.TheWater CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 4 &SewerSuperintendenthasindicatedthathehashadissuesinthepastwhere unusedwaterservicesleak,creatingasinkholethatcouldimpactthestreet.By closingofftheconnectionatthemain,thisissuecanbeprevented.Also,ifthe standpipeintheboulevardishitwithalawnmowerforexample,thatcancreate leakingissuesaswell. Thedevelopmentagreementthereforerequiresanassumptionofallliabilityforthe extraserviceifnotabandonedpertheCityEngineerandWater&Sewer Superintendent’srecommendation. Therehasbeensomediscussionwiththeadjoiningpropertyownertothenorth regardingtheuseoftheextrasetofsewerandwaterservicesfordevelopmentof theirvacantlot.Iftheapplicantandadjoiningpropertyownercometoaseparate, privateagreementregardingutiltizingtheextrasetofservices,arevisedutilityplan illustratingthatconnectionandlineserviceswillberequired. Atthistime,theCityEngineerhasreviewedtherevisedrecordgradingandutility planscurrentlyonfileandhasminorcomments. 9.TheapplicantsmustaddasignaturelineontheFinalPlatfortheneighbortothewest orVineStreet,duetotitleinterestintheplattingoftheVineStreetrightofway.This signaturelineisincludedonthefinalplatpresentedforconsiderationatthistime. 10.Theapplicantmustprovidedetailsoftreeprotectiononthelandscapingplan, consistentwiththenotesincludedonthegradingplan.Thisitemhasbeenaddressed ontherecordpreliminaryplatplansonfilewiththeCity. DEVELOPMENTCONTRACT&FINANCEPLAN ThedevelopmentcontractforVineStreetPlaceincludesmanyofthestandardprovisions forplatdevelopment,includingzoninganddesignprovisions,andgradinganderosion managementrequirements.However,thecontractdoesreflectthenatureoftheprojectas asmallresidentialsubdivisiontoaccommodateaduplexdevelopment. Giventhesites’locationintheOriginalPlatofMonticello,aswellasthefactthatthe duplexisapresumedallowabledensityforthesite,notrunkchargeshavebeenassigned. ThisallowanceissubjecttoCouncilconsideration.Asanote,staffbelievesthat additionalstudyregardingapplicationoftrunkfeesintheOriginalPlatandLower Monticelloisnecessary-butthatresearchanddiscussioncanoccurwithCounciloutside ofthisreviewandapproval.Atthistime,Councilisonlyaskedtoconsiderapprovalof thisplatwithoutapplicationoftrunkfees.Approvalofthedevelopmentcontractas presentedintheSupportingDatadoesnotrequirepaymentoftrunkfees. Aspreviouslynoted,theapplicanthassubmittedarevisedutilityplanwhichindicates thattheywillnotabandontheadditional,unusedwaterservicewithintheplat.TheCity CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 5 EngineerandWater&SewerSuperintendentrecommendabandoningthewaterservice byclosingtheconnectionwheretheserviceintersectsthemaininthestreetandalso removingthestandpipeintheboulevard.Thedevelopmentagreementthereforerequires anassumptionofallliabilityfortheextraserviceifnotabandonedpertheCityEngineer andWater&SewerSuperintendent’srecommendation. Councilwillagainnotethattherehasbeensomediscussionwiththeadjoiningproperty ownertothenorthregardingtheuseoftheextrasetofsewerandwaterservicesfor developmentoftheirvacantlot.Iftheapplicantandadjoiningpropertyownercometoa separate,privateagreementregardingtheextrasetofservices,arevisedutilityplan illustratingthatconnectionandlineserviceswillberequired. Parkdedicationhasbeendeterminedtobeapplicableandhasbeenidentifiedinthe agreement.Theapplicantcanelecttoassessthischargeastheagreementiscurrently written.Theagreementalsorequiresthepaymentofexpensesof$2,377overtheoriginal depositassociatedwiththepreliminaryplatreview.Thisoverageisduetothe complexityassociatedwiththeVineStreetrightofwayandin-fillnatureofthesite. Theagreementreflectsasmallerthanstandarddepositforlegal,planningand engineeringadministrationoftheplat.Thisisduetothefactthatallutilitiesandstreet improvementsareinplace.Gradingandutilityinspectionandreviewwilloccurwithany necessaryrightofwaypermitsandbuildingpermitinspections.Nodepositfor mailboxes,streetlights,streetsignsorsweepingwasdeemedtobenecessary,subjectto Councilreview.Aminimaldepositof$500hasbeenthereforebeenprovidedinthe agreementandthatamountissubjecttoreconciliation. Councilisalsoaskedtoconsideraspartofthefinalplatanddevelopmentcontract approvalthereallocationofexpensesfromthisprojecttoengineeringandlegalbudgets. Thisreallocationisrequestedtomoreaccuratelyreflectthereviewassociatedwiththe plat.Reviewexpensesassociatedwiththerevisiontothedrivewaywidth(andresulting changestothegradingplan),treesizedeterminationandVinePlacerightofwayreview wouldbemovedfromthisprojecttotheplanningandengineeringbudgets.Thisamount is$3,361.11.ApprovalofthedevelopmentcontractaspresentedintheSupportingData willallowforthisre-allocation. Otherapplicabledepositsassociatedwiththeplatincludethoseforlandscapingand placementofironmonuments.Thesearereturnedinfulloncetherequireditemsare complete. ENCROACHMENTAGREEMENT Twoeasementencroachmentsaredepictedontheproposedsiteplanfortheduplex:a patioareaforLot2andthesoutherndriveway,whichliesapproximately3feetfromthe southproperty.AcopyoftheencroachmentagreementisattachedforCouncil consideration. CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 6 Theeasementencroachmentagreementmustbefiledwiththepropertywhentheplatis recorded. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS 1.MotiontoadoptCityCouncilResolution#2015-046approvingtheFinalPlatand DevelopmentAgreementfortheVineStreetPlaceatwo-lotsubdivisioninanR-2 (SingleandTwoFamilyResidence)District,andapprovalofencroachment agreementforVineStreetPlace,subjecttoconditionsoutlinedintheattached ResolutionNo.2014–046.Theapprovalincludesthewaiverofapplicationfeeand escrowfortheplatre-application. 2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2015-046basedonfindingsenumeratedby theCityCouncil. 3.Motionofother. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION Staffrecommendsalternative#1,withcommentsrelatedtoapplicablechargessubjectto Councilcomment. D.SUPPORTINGDATA A.Resolution2015-046 B.FinalPlat C.DevelopmentAgreement D.FinancePlan E.EncroachmentAgreement F.ProposedDraftCrossEasement G.ProposedDraftMaintenanceAgreement H.RevisedRecordPreliminaryPlatDocuments,including: a.TitleSheet b.SitePlan c.Grading&DrainagePlan d.UtilityPlan e.LandscapePlan f.DetailSheet g.DetailSheet h.PreliminaryPlat I.SubdivisionOrdinance J.BuildingElevations Z.ConditionsofApproval CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 7 EXHIBITZ:CONDITIONSOFAPPROVAL PlatofVineStreetPlace 1.VineStreetshallbededicatedperthefinalplatapprovedbytheCityCouncilonJune8th, 2015. 2.Theplatandplandocumentsshallcomplywiththerequirementsandrecommendationsof theCityEngineerandCountySurveyor. 3.TheCityapprovedaVariancetothezoningordinancefortheVineStreetPlace developmentonJuly1st,2014.Theplansarerequiredtocomplywithallconditionsas approvedaspartoftheVarianceconsideration. 4.Simultaneouswiththerecordingofthefinalplat,Developershallprovideandrecordan easementoverLot1infavorofLot2foraccesstoVineStreetthatalsoaddressesuseand maintenanceofthedriveway,providesutilitiestoLot2andeasementpremises,and providesforlong-termmaintenanceandcapitalimprovementsbetweenthetwoparcels. 5.Iftheapplicantandadjoiningpropertyownertothenorthcometoanagreement regardingtheextrasetofwaterandsewerservices,arevisedutilityplanillustratingthe connectionwillberequiredtobesubmitted. 6.Thesharedwallfacingonthezerolotlinemustbeastructuralwallmeetingbuilding codeandpropertylinerequirements. 7.Executionofanencroachmentagreementforimprovementsinthepubliceasements. 8.Executionofadevelopmentagreementgoverningrequirementsandimprovementsinthe plat. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-046 APPROVING A FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTAND APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR VINE STREET PLACE ADDDITION WHEREAS, Patrick Benoit of Benoit Properties, LLC has submitted an application for final plat approval and an encroachment agreement for the proposed development of Vine Street Place Addition; and WHEREAS, the final plat will meet design standards and other provisions outlined in Title XI, the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance subject to conditions enumerated below; and WHEREAS, Lot 2 of Vine Street Place Addition has no direct street access, and said Lot received approval of a variance on July 1st, 2014 from zoning and subdivision standards by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals; and WHEREAS, Lot 2 will access the Vine Street cul-de-sac via an access easement across a shared driveway with Lot 1, both of which encroach into the public drainage and utility easement; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 1st, 2014 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello adopted Resolution #2014- 066 stating the following Findings of Fact in their recommendation of approval: 1. The lot in question has sufficient area to accommodate a two-family home, 2. A duplex is a permitted use in the R-2 District, and the proposed site and building plan meets all required setbacks established by the district. 3. There are special circumstances affecting this lot which justify the granting of the variance in order to allow for reasonable use of the property and granting the variance will not be detrimental to the public health and welfare. 4. The site and building plans meet the performance standards in the ordinance for the development of a duplex in the R-2 District subject to the conditions outlined below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the final plat and encroachment agreement are hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Vine Street shall be dedicated per the final plat approved by the City Council on June 8th, 2015. 2. The plat and plan documents shall comply with the requirements and recommendations of the City Engineer and County Surveyor. 3. The City approved a Variance to the zoning ordinance for the Vine Street Place development on July 1st, 2014. The plans are required to comply with all conditions as approved as part of the Variance consideration. 4. Simultaneous with the recording of the final plat, Developer shall provide and record an easement over Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2 for access to Vine Street that also addresses use and maintenance of the driveway, provides utilities to Lot 2 and easement premises, and provide for long-term maintenance and capital improvements between the two parcels. 5. If the applicant and adjoining property owner to the north come to an agreement regarding the extra set of water and sewer services, a revised utility plan illustrating the connection will be required to be submitted. 6. The shared wall facing on the zero lot line must be a structural wall meeting building code and property line requirements. 7. Execution of an encroachment agreement for improvements in the public easements. 8. Execution of a development agreement governing requirements and improvements in the plat. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the Development Contract for Vine Street Place Addition is hereby approved, subject to the applicable conditions as stated above. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 8th day of June, 2015. CITY OF MONTICELLO _______________________________ Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator 1 123633 (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) VINE STREET PLACE AGREEMENT dated ____________________, 2015, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and BENOIT PROPERTIES, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Corporation (the “Developer”). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. On June 8th, 2015, the City approved a plat for VINE STREET PLACE (referred to in this Contract as the “plat” and the “Development”), consisting of two (2) residential lots to be developed as a duplex. The land is situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, and is legally described on the attached Exhibit “A”. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City approved the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 365 days of the date the plat is approved. The City Council approved the plat subject to the following additional conditions: a) Vine Street shall be dedicated per the final plat approved by the City Council on June 8th, 2015. 2 123633 b) The plat and plan documents shall comply with the requirements and recommendations of the City Engineer and County Surveyor. c) The City approved a Variance to the zoning ordinance for the Vine Street Place development on July 1st, 2014. The plans are required to comply with all conditions as approved as part of the Variance consideration. d) Simultaneous with the recording of the final plat, Developer shall provide and record an easement over Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2 for access to Vine Street that also addresses use and maintenance of the driveway, provides utilities to Lot 2 and easement premises, and provides for long-term maintenance and capital improvements between the two parcels. e) If the applicant and adjoining property owner to the north come to an agreement regarding the extra set of water and sewer services, a revised utility plan illustrating the connection will be required to be submitted. f) The shared wall facing on the zero lot line must be a structural wall meeting building code and property line requirements. g) Execution of an encroachment agreement for improvements in the public easements. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat and this contract have been submitted to the Wright County Recorder's Office, and 4) the City has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. The plat is not a part of a multi-phased preliminary plat. 5. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 3 123633 6. ZONING. Except as otherwise provided herein, the subject property shall be subject to the zoning regulations of the R-2 (Single and Two Family Residence) District for residential lot design. 7. CONDITION FOR SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS. No final plat for changes or amendments to this agreement shall be approved, nor shall construction commence for such additional land uses, until an amendment of the agreement is processed and approved, subject to the requirements of the Monticello Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. 8. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. With the exceptions of Plan A, the plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plans A and B, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A—Plat, dated Plan B— Preliminary Plat, dated Plan C – Site Plan, dated Plan D - Final Grading, Development, and Erosion Control Plan, dated Plan E—Utility Plan, dated Plan F - Landscape Plan, dated Plan G – Mailbox Location Plan 9. IMPROVEMENTS. Public utilities, including sanitary sewer, watermain and street have been installed in Vine Street and are accessible to the development. Developer shall pay for, be responsible for, and install the following according to City requirements: A. Plat B. Site Grading and Erosion Control C. Underground Utilities D. Setting of Iron Monuments 4 123633 E. Surveying and Staking F. Landscaping/Trees G. Mailboxes: All developers must meet with the City of Monticello Street Superintendent and USPS to determine the type of mail boxes installed and the location of all mail boxes. The City of Monticello requires that mail boxes be clustered in groups of six (6) or more and a minimum spacing of 200 feet between cluster locations, unless deemed not practical by the City Street Superintendent and/or the USPS. Initial costs of the mail boxes and their installation are the responsibility of the developer. Effective (date of ordinance change), all residential developments (other than standard single family homes) must install locking cluster mail boxes. The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction; and any other ordinances. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer's engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" plans, an electronic file of the "as constructed" plans in an auto CAD.DWG file or a .DXF file, and two complete sets of blue line "as constructed" plans, all prepared in accordance with City standards. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 10. DESIGN STANDARDS. The applicable Zoning District Regulations are equal to those set forth in the R-2 (Single and Two Family Residence) Zoning District Regulations. 5 123633 11. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to:  Wright County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights-of-Way  Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains  NPDES Permit for Stormwater Connections  MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal  DNR for Dewatering  City of Monticello for Building Permits  City of Monticello for Grading Permits  City of Monticello for Right of Way Permit 12. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will be the Developer’s and the Developer’s contractors and subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewa tering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 13. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements by November 1, 2015. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 14. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the platted property (including dedicated easements) to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 15. EROSION CONTROL, STORM WATER CONTROL AND STREET CLEANUP. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plan “D”, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control and storm water requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 48 hours after the completion of the work or in an area that is inactive for more than seven (7) days unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer. Seeding shall be in accordance with the City’s current seeding specification, except as 6 123633 otherwise provided in the erosion control plan. Seeding may include certified oat seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, home builders, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. The Developer shall pay a penalty of $100.00 a day for each calendar day that the streets are not cleaned in accordance with this paragraph. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, or repeatedly fails to clean and sweep streets, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate, including the performance of the necessary work by City staff or contracting to have it performed. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer’s and City’s rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may withdraw money from the escrow account or draw down the letter of credit to the extent necessary to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan and storm water control measures are in place. Upon request by Developer, the City will every six (6) months release the $500.00 per unit erosion control deposit for finished lots. 16. GRADING PLAN AND CERTIFICATION. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading plan, stormwater control measures and erosion control plan as set forth in Plan "D". The plan shall conform to City of Monticello specifications. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City approves individual building permits (except model homes as permitted by this agreement), the Developer shall provide the City with an "as-built" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. Additionally, the "as-built" grading plan will include a certification that the grading following construction activities has been undisturbed or has been returned to the state required in the grading plan. The "as-built" plan shall include field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas 7 123633 if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles, and installed "conservation area" posts; and c) lot corner elevations, and building pads. A development plan will be required to be submitted with the "as-built" grading plan as described in the City’s Plan Requirements and Design Guideline Manual. The City will withhold issuance of building permits until the approved "as-built" grading plan and development plan is on file with the City, conservation posts are installed, approved tree preservation plan and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. The Developer certifies to the City that all lots with building footings placed on fill have been monitored and constructed to meet or exceed FHA/HUD 79G specifications. 17. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. 18. CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD, PLANNING AND LEGAL EXPENSES, CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. An escrow for City staff administration relating to processing of the pla t and associated administration, planning, engineering and legal costs shall be required in the amount of $500.00. This is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. This amount covers the following: Street and utility plan review and project administration, monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and his e ngineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Also included in the deposit is the cost of construction observation performed by the City’s in-house engineering staff or consulting engineer. Construction observation will be billed on hourly rates. Upon completion of the project this amount shall be reconciled against actual City costs. This amount also covers Grading plan review and project administration, monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and his engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Upon completion of the project this amount shall be reconciled against the actual City costs. 8 123633 19. CLAIMS. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment from the City, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125 percent of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees pursuant to this Contract. 20. STORM SEWER AREA AND PONDING CHARGE. The Development is not subject to a storm sewer area charge. 21. SANITARY SEWER AREA CHARGE. The Development is not subject to a sanitary sewer area charge. 22. WATER MAIN AREA CHARGE. The Development is not subject to a water main area charge. 23. PARK DEDICATION. The Developer shall be assessed or shall pay a cash contribution of $2,750.00 in satisfaction of the City’s park dedication requirements. The share is calculated as follows: 11% x $25,000 = $2,750.00 The total spark dedication charge for the Development of $2,750.00 shall be assessed against the property if not paid by the Developer in cash at the time of final plat approval or shall be assessed per the terms of paragraph 27D herein. 24. EXISTING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. The property to be platted as Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 2, Block 1, Vine Street Place, PID 155-010-022010 is subject to special assessments for Vine Street per the agreement dated November 24th, 2003 “Assessment Agreement” between the City and the fee owners (“Assessment Agreement”). These amounts have been levied by Wright County beginning with taxes payable for 2014. In entering into this Development Agreement, the Developer assumes all responsibility for payment of these special assessments 9 123633 and there is no obligation for payment of any portion of the assessment per the Assessment Agreement for Lot 5, Block 23, Original Plat of Monticello. 25. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format in either an AutoCAD.DWG file or a .DXF file. All construction record drawings (e.g. grading, utilities, and streets) shall be in electronic format in accordance with standard City specifications. The Developer shall also submit one complete set of reproducible construction plans on Mylar. No signatures will be placed on the final plat until all conditions of approval have been met and the terms of this section have been met. B. The developer shall pay for City expenses over deposit for the review of the preliminary plat and variance in the amount of $2,377.49. C. Vine Street shall be dedicated per the final plat, approved by the City Council on June 8th, 2015. D. The plat and plan documents shall comply with the requirements and recommendations of the City Engineer and County Surveyor E. The City approved a Variance to the zoning ordinance for the Vine Street Place development on July 1st, 2014. The plans are required to comply with all conditions as approved as part of the Variance consideration. F. Simultaneous with the recording of the final plat, Developer shall provide and record an easement over Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2 for access to Vine Street that also addresses use and maintenance of the driveway, provides utilities to Lot 2 and easement premises, and provides for long-term maintenance and capital improvements between the two parcels. G. A third water service exists on the west side of the property, extending from the main at Vine Street. Should a private agreement for the use of that service not be executed with the adjacent property owner to the 10 123633 north, the developer and all successors, heirs and assigns of this agreement, including property owner of Lot 1, Block 1, Vine Street Place, hereby assumes all liability and cost associated with this service. 26. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this agreement, payment, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from a bank (“security”) for $1,550.00. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Sanitary Sewer $ NA Watermain $ NA Storm Sewer/Draintile/Infiltration Basin $ NA Internal Streets, Roads, Driveways, Sidewalks $ NA Landscaping $ 800.00 Lot Corners/Iron Monuments ($300.00 x 2 x 125%) $ 750.00 TOTAL SECURITIES: $ 1,550.00 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The security shall be for an automatically renewing term. Individual security instruments may be for shorter terms provided they are automatically renewed on an annual basis until expiration. The City may draw down the security, with fifteen (15) days written notice to Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until all improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, and the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 11 123633 27. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. A. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Contract which must be furnished to the City prior to the time of final plat approval: City Legal/Planning/Engineering $ 500.00 City Expenses over deposit (preliminary plat and variance review) $ 2,377.49 Storm Sewer $ NA Sanitary Sewer $ NA Water Main Area $ NA Park $ 2,750.00 TOTAL CASH REQUIREMENTS $5,627.49 B. If Developer chooses to have assessed the park dedication as identified in paragraphs 23 as noted above, the $2,750.00 shall be apportioned across the 2 units of the plat, with each unit being assigned an assessment of $1,375.99. This assessment shall be payable over a two (2) year period, in two (2) equal principal installments, plus interest per annum, paid at the prevailing rate plus 1.5% at the time of certificate of assessment, on the remaining principal balance each year. Interest will begin to accrue on the principal balance commencing on the date of final plat approval by the City of Monticello. C. Developer hereby waives unconditionally all procedural and substantive objections to the assessment including, but not limited to, any rights to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment constitutes a special benefit or that the amount of the assessment exceeds the special benefit to the Development property. The Developer further waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 429.081 or other laws. 28. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. The Developer shall pay all actual costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. The Developer shall deposit with the City the amount set forth in Section 28 to be used for the payment of these fees and 12 123633 enforcement fees. If the amount in the deposit account drops below 15% of the initial amount, the Developer will make additional deposits in amounts set by the City. At the completion of the project and following payment of all expenses related to the project, the City shall return the remaining deposit funds to the Developer. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this Contract. This is an obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells a part or parts of the platted land. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges (“WAC”), City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. 29. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission 13 123633 to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 30. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the plat ceases to comply with county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. E. Grading, curbing, approved erosion control and one lift of asphalt shall be installed on all private and public streets prior to issuance of any building permits, except model homes as permitted by this agreement or the Building Official. Individual lot as-built grading and development plans will be required for any model home permits. F. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. G. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer. 14 123633 H. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. I. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. J. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The Developer must provide a Certificate of Insurance which meets the following requirements: 1. The Description section of the Accord form needs to read “City of Monticello is named as Additional Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto Liability policies on a Primary and Non- Contributory Basis.” Each policy shall provide 30 days notice of cancellation to City of Monticello. 2. Certificate Holder must be City of Monticello. 3. Provide copy of policy endorsement showing City of Monticello named as Additional Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis. 15 123633 K. Each contract of a municipality must require the prime contractor to pay any subcontractor within ten days of the prime contractor's receipt of payment from the municipality for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The contract must require the prime contractor to pay interest of 1-1/2 percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. For an unpaid balance of less than $100, the prime contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from a prime contractor must b e awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. L. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. M. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells a part or parts of the platted land. N. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls the development plans, or special conditions referred to in this Contract required to be constructed shall be constructed before any other building permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. 31. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: _________________________________________. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be 16 123633 either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, Minnesota 55362. CITY: CITY OF MONTICELLO BY: ___________________________________________ Brian Stumpf, Mayor (SEAL) AND __________________________________________ Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 20 15, by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O’Neill, the Mayor and City Administrator, respectively, of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC BENOIT PROPERTIES, LLC: BY: ___________________________________________ Its President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2015 by __________________________________ the ____________________________________ of _____________________________. a Minnesota corporation, on its behalf. ______________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 17 123633 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 [SMM] EXHIBIT A TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Legal Description 18 123633 EXHIBIT B TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Plans 19 123633 MORTGAGE CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ________________________, ____________________, which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2015. _________________________, _________________________ By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________, 2005, by _____________________________________ the ________________________ of__________________, _________________________, on its behalf. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452-5000 20 123633 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2_____, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2007. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 500. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ 21 123633 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE PROJECT: CERTIFICATE HOLDER: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 INSURED: ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Monticello AGENT: WORKERS' COMPENSATION: Policy No. __________________ Effective Date: ______________ Expiration Date: _____________ Insurance Company: COVERAGE - Workers' Compensation, Statutory. GENERAL LIABILITY: Policy No. __________________ Effective Date: ______________ Expiration Date: _____________ Insurance Company: ( ) Claims Made ( ) Occurrence LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury and Death: $500,000 for one person $1,000,000 for each occurrence Property Damage: $200,000 for each occurrence -OR- Combination Single Limit Policy $1,000,000 or more 22 123633 COVERAGE PROVIDED: Operations of Contractor: YES Operations of Sub-Contractor (Contingent): YES Does Personal Injury Include Claims Related to Employment? YES Completed Operations/Products: YES Contractual Liability (Broad Form): YES Governmental Immunity is Waived: YES Property Damage Liability Includes: Damage Due to Blasting YES Damage Due to Collapse YES Damage Due to Underground Facilities YES Broad Form Property Damage YES AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY: Policy No. __________________ Effective Date: ______________ Expiration Date: _____________ Insurance Company: (X) Any Auto LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury: $500,000 each person $1,000,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $500,000 each occurrence -OR- Combined Single Limit Policy: $1,000,000 each occurrence ARE ANY DEDUCTIBLES APPLICABLE TO BODILY INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGE ON ANY OF THE ABOVE COVERAGES: If so, list: Amount: $________________ [Not to exceed $1,000.00] 23 123633 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL TEN (10) DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE PARTIES TO WHOM THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED. Dated at _____________________________ On __________________________________ BY: _________________________________ Authorized Insurance Representative SUMMARY OF EXPENSES/FINANCE PLAN Single Phase 6/2/2015 DRAFT Total Acres in Development 0.36 gross 0.36 net Total Acres in Phase 0.36 gross 0.36 net Total Units in Development 2 0 Single Family 2 Townhome 0 Mutli-Family Total Units in Phase 0 Single Family 2 Townhome 0 Multi-Family Trunk Area Charges & Park Dedication Acreage Acres or Credits Net Notes Charge Units Charge Park & Pathway Dedication Park Dedication Provided NA Park Dedication Required (11%)0.4 land dedication - not applicable per Parks Commission Park Dedication Deficiency NA Park Dedication Deficiency as a % of total NA Prevailing Park Dedication $2,750 cash in lieu; paid based on value of raw land at time of plat Total Park Dedication Required $2,750.00 applicable per Parks Commission Special Assessments Road Reconstruction NA Lift Station NA Booster Station NA San Sew, Water, Storm Sewer Trunk Fees*NA Total Amount $2,750.00 Per Lot Charge based on (#) units 2 $1,375.00 May be assessed per unit by agreement City Fees/Deposit Preliminary Plat/Variance Expenses over Deposit $2,377.49 City Fee (General Admin)$500.00 Actual; cost reconciled at project completion Legal incl above Actual; cost reconciled at project completion Planning incl above Actual; cost reconciled at project completion Engineering and Inspection incl above Inspector /Engineer cost reconciled at project completion Grading and Restoration Streets and Utilities GPS Locate $60 2 NA Existing Total City Fees $2,877.49 Improvement Construction Costs (Used to Calculate City Fees/Escrows/Securities) Notes Sanitary Sewer NA Watermain NA Storm Sewer NA Roads, Driveways and Sidewalks/Trails NA Lighting, Street Signage, Mailboxes NA Construction total (for purpose of calculating other fees)$0.00 Lot Corners/Iron Monuments $300 2 $600.00 Total Construction Cost for the purpose of calculating LOC $600.00 Letter of Credit Amount (Total cost X 125%)$750.00 Maximum allowable reduction prior to acceptance and bond 90.00%$675.00 ADDITIONAL REQUIRED LETTERS OF CREDIT/SECURITY Landscaping $200 2 2.00 $800.00 Prairie Restoration NA Tree Preservation NA Grading $3,000 payable with grading permit or included with bldg. permit Street Sweeping $500 2 Per DA, Sec.15 Total Additional LOC/Cash Security $800.00 * Trunk fee program intended to apply to lots located in community growth areas where downstream systems need oversizing in order to accommodate growth. this situation does not apply for infill - R1 or R2 development that occurs within the existing plat of the City. 1 (reserved for recording information) ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this _______ day of _____________, 2015, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and BENOIT PROPERTIES, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Owner"). 1. BACKGROUND. Owner is the fee owner of certain property located within the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, Vine Street Place, according to the recorded plat thereof. ("subject property"). The City owns easements for drainage and utility purposes over portions of the subject property as shown on the attached Exhibit “A”. Owner would like to construct a paved access drive aisle and patio area on the subject property which will encroach into the City's easement areas as depicted on the attached Exhibit “B”. 2. ENCROACHMENT AUTHORIZATION. The City hereby approves the encroachment in its easement areas for the construction, use, and maintenance of the proposed paved drive aisle and patio area as depicted on the attached Exhibit “B”. 2 3. MAINTENANCE. Owner shall be responsible for all costs relating to construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and repair, including snow removal, with respect to the paved drive aisle and patio area. This maintenance agreement is a personal obligation of Owner and shall be binding upon the executors, administrators, successors, heirs and assigns of Owner. 4. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY. In consideration of being allowed to encroach in the City's easement areas, Owner, its/their successors, heirs and assigns, hereby agree(s) to indemnify and hold the City harmless from all costs and expenses, claims and liability, including reasonable attorney's fees, relating to or arising out of this grant to Owner of permission to encroach in the City's easement areas for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, use, operation, and the like of the paved drive aisle and patio area. 5. TERMINATION. If the City reasonably determines that the drive aisle and/or patio unreasonably interferes with the use, maintenance or repair of the City’s utilities within the easement areas, Owner upon request by the City shall remove and replace the interference at its/their sole expense. If Owner fails to remove the interference in the timeframe required by the City, the City may remove the interference and shall have no obligation for damages to, or repair or replacement of the interference removed by the City. Further, the Owner consents to the City levying an assessment against the subject property for the City’s costs. If Owner fails to maintain the drive aisle and/or patio or fails to remove and replace any interference as provided in this paragraph, the City may, at its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement by giving the current owner of the subject property thirty (30) days advance written notice except that no notice period will be required in the case of an emergency condition as determined solely by the City and the Agreement may then be terminated immediately. 3 The City may unilaterally terminate this Agreement if the drive aisle interferes with any maintenance or improvements within the City’s easement areas as determined by the City. 6. RECORDING. This Agreement shall be recorded against the title to the subject property and shall be binding upon Owner, its/their assigns, heirs and successors in interest. CITY OF MONTICELLO BY: _________________________________ (SEAL) Brian Stumpf, Mayor AND ________________________________ Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of ______________, 2014, by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O’Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ____________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC 4 BENOIT PROPERTIES, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company _____________________________________ By: ______________________ Its: President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of ___________, 2014, by________________, the President of Benoit Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. ____________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 SRN:ms 5 EXHIBIT “A” SKETCH OF CITY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS 6 EXHIBIT “B” SKETCH DEPICTING ACCESS DRIVE AISLE AND PATIO ENCROACHMENTS 94+)*6%1706;/+00'516# BSBBSB BS B BS B BS B BS B BS B BSB BS B BS B BS B BS B BSB N BS B BSBBSB BS B BS B BS B BS B BS B BSB BS B BS B BS B BS B BSB N BSBBSB BS B BS B BS B BS B BS B BSB BS B BS B BS B BS B BSB N N 1 2 Bl o c k 1 ¾ ¾ BSB BS B BS B BS B BS B BS B BS B BS B BS B BS B BS B BS B BSB / SB L SB L 8S J H I U $ P V O U Z . J O O F T P U B 7* $ * / * 5 : . " 1 4F D T 5 X Q 3 H F MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TITLE XI/Chapt 3/Page 1 CHAPTER 3 PROCEDURE SECTION: 11-3-1:Procedure 11-3-2:Preliminary Plat 11-3-3:Final Plat 11-3-1:PROCEDURE: Prior to formal plat review by the Planning Commission, the applicant is encouraged to present a sketch plan to the Planning Commission for purposes of informally discussing, to present his intentions for development of the property, and be able to obtain the views and opinions of the City Planning Commission. 11-3-2:PRELIMINARY PLAT: (A)FILING: Fifteen (15) copies of the preliminary plat shall be filed with the City Clerk. The required filing fee as established in Chapter 10 shall be paid, and any necessary applications for variances from the provisions of this ordinance shall be filed with the required fee before the proposed plat shall be considered officially file. All plats shall be accompanied by an abstractor’s certificate, properly certified, identifying the owner of the property in question and the owners of all properties situated within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the boundary of the property in question. Applications for a Preliminary Plat shall be due no later than eight (8) weeks plus one (1) day prior to the Planning Commission meeting at which the item is to be considered. Applications that are deemed incomplete as of that date shall be returned to the applicant in accordance with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 15.99. Applications for Preliminary Plats that consist of nineteen (19) or fewer residential units or non- residential plats of five (5) or fewer acres may, at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator, be placed on an earlier Planning Commission agenda, but in no case shall said meeting be sooner than four (4) weeks and one (1) day from the date of a complete application. (#426, 7/11/05) (B)HEARING: Upon receipt of said application, the City Clerk shall set a public hearing for the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall conduct the hearing and report upon findings and make recommendations to the City Council. Notice of said hearing shall be published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, an d wri t t en notifi cat i o n of s ai d hear i n g shall b e mailed a t leas t ten (10) days prior to all owners of land identified on the above-mentioned abstractor's certificate. MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TITLE XI/Chapt 3/Page 2 (C)TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REPORTS: After the public hearing has been set, the City Administrator shall instruct the staff to prepare technical reports (where appropriate) and provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation on the action to the City Council. (D)REVIEW BY OTHER COMMISSIONS OR JURISDICTIONS: When appropriate, the City Administrator shall file copies of the preliminary plat with the Park and Recreation Commission and/or Wright County for their review and comment. (E)REPORT TO COUNCIL: The Planning Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council within sixty (60) days following the public hearing. (F)CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 1.The Council shall act upon the preliminary plat within one hundred twenty (120) days of the date on which it was officially filed. If the recommendation of the Planning Commission has not been received in time to meet the requirement, the Council may act on the preliminary plat without such recommendation. 2.If the preliminary plat is not approved by the City Council, the reasons for such action shall be recorded in the proceedings of the Council and transmitted to the applicant. If the preliminary plat is approved, such approval shall not constitute final acceptance of the layout. Subsequent approval will be required of the engineering proposals and other features and requirements as specified by this ordinance to be indicated on the final plat. The City Council may require such revisions in the preliminary plat and final plat as it deems necessary for the health, safety, general welfare, and convenience of the City of Monticello. 11-3-3:FINAL PLAT: After the preliminary plat has been approved, the final plat may be submitted for approval as follows: (A)APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Following approval of the Preliminary Plat by the City Council, a Final Plat may be submitted for approval. The Zoning Administrator shall place the proposed Final Plat on the agenda for the next City Council which is no less than three (3) weeks later than the date of submission. No Final Plat application shall be considered complete unless that applicant shall have also submitted a revised Preliminary Plat which as been revised to reflect all required conditions of approval, a signed copy of the Development Agreement for the area subject to the Final Plat, shall have paid all bills due for processing of the Preliminary Plat, and has provided evidence of adequate financial security for completion of the construction work in the proposed plat. If the City Council determines it is MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TITLE XI/Chapt 3/Page 3 necessary, the final plat shall be filed with the City Clerk and submitted to the Planning Commission at least twenty (20) days prior to a Commission meeting at which consideration is requested. During the said twenty (20) days, the City staff shall examine the final plat and prepare a recommendation to the Planning Commission. Approval, disapproval, or any delay in decision of the final plat will be conveyed to the subdivider within ten (10) days after the meeting of the City Planning Commission at which such plat was considered. In case the plat is disapproved, the subdivider shall be notified in writing of the reason for such action and what requirements shall be necessary to meet the approval of the Commission. If the plat is disapproved, a waiting period of one hundred eighty (180) days shall lapse before another application can be filed on that tract of land. In cases where the preliminary plat is approved, the final plat must be filed within one (1) year of the preliminary plat approval or the approval is not valid. (#426, 7/11/05) (B)APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL: After review of the final plat by the Planning Commission, if necessary, such final plat, together with the recommendations of the Planning Commission, shall be submitted to the City Council for approval. The City Council has the option of requesting a public hearing if it is determined necessary on the final plat. If accepted, the final plat shall be approved by resolution, which resolution shall provide for the acceptance of all agreements for basic improvements, public dedication, and other requirements as indicated by the City Council. If disapproved, the grounds for any refusal to approve a plat shall be set forth in the proceedings of the Council and reported to the person or persons applying for such approval. (#8, 2/23/76) (C)RECORDING FINAL PLAT: If the final plat is approved by the City Council, the subdivider shall record it with the County Recorder within one hundred (100) days after said approval. If the subdivider fails to so record the final plat, the approval shall be considered void, unless a request for time extension is submitted in writing and approved by the City Council prior to the expiration of the one hundred (100) day period. The subdivider shall, immediately upon recording, furnish the City Clerk with a print and reproducible tracing of the final plat showing evidence of recording. No building permits shall be let for construction of any structure on any lot said plat until the City has received evidence of the plat being recorded by the County. (#412, 8/23/04) (D)RECORDING OF MULTIPLE-PHASED PLATS: If a preliminary plat is final platted in stages, unless otherwise provided for in the development contract, all stages must be final platted into lots and blocks (not outlots) within three (3) years after the preliminary plat has been approved by the City Council. If the final plats are not approved and recorded in accordance with this time frame, the preliminary plat approval shall be considered void, unless a request for time extension is submitted in writing and approved by the City Council prior to the expiration of the three (3) year period. (#412, 8/23/04) MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TITLE XI/Chapt 3/Page 4 MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TITLE XI/Chapt 3/Page 5 MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TITLE XI/Chapt 3/Page 6 CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 1 2H.ConsiderationtoadoptResolution2015-045approvingaFinalStagePlanned UnitDevelopment(PUD),FinalPlatandDevelopmentAgreementforHoglund BusPark,atwolotcommercialdevelopmentinanexistingPlannedUnit DevelopmentDistrict,andtoapproveasidewalkeasementassociatedwiththe plat.Applicant:WAGPartners,LLP(AS/NAC) Property:Legal:Lengthy,seeplat Address:116EastOakwoodDrive PlanningCaseNumber:2014–043,ZHOGL-EFINAL A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND Request(s):AmendaPlannedUnitDevelopmentandplattingto allowforare-subdivisionofsixexistingparcelsinto twoplattedlotsaccommodatingdistinctbusinesses. DeadlineforDecision:Extendedperwrittenrequestofapplicant LandUseDesignation:PlacestoWork ZoningDesignation:PUD,PlannedUnitDevelopment ThepurposeofthePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD) zoningdistrictistoprovidegreaterflexibilityinthe developmentofneighborhoodsandnon-residential areasinordertomaximizepublicvaluesandachieve morecreativedevelopmentoutcomeswhileremaining economicallyviableandmarketable. CurrentSiteUse:BusandTruckGarage/Maintenance/Sales SurroundingLandUses: North:I-94,Commercial East:Business/LightIndustrial South:Commercial West:Commercial ProjectDescription:Theapplicantsseektorecombinetheseveralexisting parcelsintotwoplattedlots,dividedbyafence,to clarifyownershipandactivitiesbetweenthetwo principalbusinessesoccupyingthesubjectproperty. CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 2 ANALYSIS TheCityCouncilapprovedtheamendmenttodevelopmentstageplannedunit developmentandpreliminaryplatfortheproposedHoglundBusParkinMarchof thisyear. Thepropertyhasbeenutilizedforbusandtrucksales,storage,andmaintenancefor manyyears,evolvingoverthattimetothecurrentcondition.Thepropertywaszoned tothePUD,PlannedUnitDevelopmentDistrictin2001.ThePUDwasappliedtothe propertyprimarilytoallowthedevelopedusestocontinuegrowintheirtraditional manner. Theproposedplatisintendedtoclarifytheunderlyingtitleissuesandallowthe businessownerstoseparatetherealestateholdingsofthetwoprincipalbusinesses thatoccupytheproperty.Todoso,theplatrecombinesalloftheunderlyingparcels andcreatesasingledividingboundaryline,generallynorthtosouththroughthe property. Asnotedwiththepreliminaryplatanalysis,thenewpropertylinewillhavenew utilityanddrainageeasementsconsistentwiththeCity’splattingrequirements.The siteplanillustratesa“new”accesstoThomasParkDrive,howeverthereisan existingaccessfromThomasParkinplaceatpresent.Staff’sunderstandingisthat theapplicantmayintendtomodifytheaccess,creatingabetterdefinedentranceat thispoint.SuchworkwillrequirearightofwaypermitandreviewbytheCity Engineer. Theonly“improvement”beingproposedasapartofthePUDamendmentisthe constructionofachainlinkfencealongthenewpropertyline,alongwithgates throughthefencethatwillcontinuetoaccommodatecrossaccessbetweenthetwo businessproperties.Thechainlinkfenceisproposedat6’inheightandisshownon thesiteplantosurroundtheproposedLot2atthepropertyline.Theunderlying zoningdistrictforthislotisI-1,whichwouldallow6’tallfencesinside,rearand frontyards,providedthefenceis50%transparentinfrontyards.ThePUDzoning forthepropertywouldfurtheraccommodatetheproposedfence. Theplatincludesthecontinuationofseverallong-standingcrossaccesseasements andaddressesafewneweasements,discussedbelow. 1.Anextensionoftheexistingaccesseasementalongthesouthboundaryofthe propertythatextendsbetweenOakwoodDriveandThomasParkDrive.The platshowssomeofthateasementinacurrenteasementdocument,andother portionsappeartobenew. 2.Additionofasidewalkeasementinthesouthwestcorneroftheplatalong OakwoodDrive,reflectingtheadditionalsidewalkservingthearea.A CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 3 separateeasementdocumentisincludedforCouncilreviewandapprovalfor saideasement. 3.AportionofThomasParkDriveisbeingdedicatedasrightofway,rather thanitspreviousstatusasstreeteasement.Thefinalplatdrawingshowsthis dedication. Asnoted,theapplicantsaremakingnootherchangestothefunctionorusesofthe site.ThePUDisnecessaryonlytoaccommodatethere-subdivision. DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT&SIDEWALKEASEMENT ThedevelopmentagreementincludedforCouncilreviewandapprovalisamodified versionofstandardtemplateagreementsusedforotherfinalplatprojects.Inthis case,astheplatisessentiallyareplatofexistinglots,thedevelopmentagreement focusesprimarilyontheproposedconfigurationandmemorializingtheexisting conditionsonthesiteforPUDpurposes. Astheprojectdoesnotincludeanynewpublicimprovementssuchasstreetsor utilities,nodepositsfortheseitemsisrequired.Additionally,withnoadditionalsite development,nosecuritiesforlandscaping,erosioncontrolorotherdevelopment- relatedsecuritiesisrequired.However,theagreementdoesrequireasecurityforthe placementofironmonumentsonthenewlotcornersandalsorequiresasecurityfor platadministration. Thesidewalkeasementdocumentprovidesforthefutureconstructionofasidewalk onOakwoodDrive. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS 1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2015-045approvingaFinalStagePlannedUnit Development(PUD),FinalPlatandDevelopmentAgreementforHoglundBus Park,atwolotcommercialdevelopmentinanexistingPlannedUnitDevelopment District,andtoapproveasidewalkeasementassociatedwiththeplat,subjectto thoseconditionsoutlinedinExhibitZ. 2.Motiontodenyadoptionof#Resolution2015-045approvingaFinalPlatand DevelopmentAgreementforHoglundBusPark,atwolotcommercial developmentinanexistingPlannedUnitDevelopmentDistrict,andtodeny adoptionResolution2015-046approvingaFinalStagePlannedUnit Development(PUD)forHoglundBusPark,andtodenyapprovalofthesidewalk easement. CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 4 C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION StaffrecommendsapprovalofthePUDAmendment,FinalPlatandsidewalk easement.Thefinalplatisconsistentwiththeapprovedpreliminaryplatandwill servetoclarifyexistingandproposedeasements,aswellasprovidedefinitionrelated tothetwoseparatebusinessenterprisesoperatingundertheexistingPUD. D.SUPPORTINGDATA A.Resolution#2014-045 B.AerialImage C.ApplicantNarrative D.ApplicantExtensionLetter E.FinalPlat F.PUDSitePlan G.DevelopmentAgreement H.ConsenttoPlat I.SidewalkEasement J.ApprovedPreliminaryPlat K.MnDOTCommentLetter L.OfficialMonticelloZoningMap Z.ConditionsofApproval CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 5 EXHIBITZ FinalStagePUDAmendmentandFinalPlat 116EastOakwoodDrive ProposedLegalDescription:Lots1and2,Block1,HoglundBusPark 1.ExecutetheDevelopmentContractforthePUDandFinalPlat. 2.ExecuteasidewalkeasementadjacenttoOakwoodDriveperCityEngineer requirements. 3.RevisefinalanddevelopmentstagePUDplanstoillustrateproperstripingand signing,andatleasttwohandicappedparkingspacesforeachbuilding. 4.ModificationstoaccesspointsatOakwoodDriveorThomasParkrequirearightof waypermitandreviewbytheCityEngineer. 5.SubjecttodocumentationexhibitingresolutionofcommentsmadeduringMnDOT review. 6.ThefinalplatissubjecttothecommentandsuggestedrevisionsoftheWrightCounty Surveyor. 7.AnyothercommentsandrecommendationsoftheCityEngineer. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-045 APPROVING FINAL STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL PLAT OF HOGLUND BUS PARK AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR HOGLUND BUS PARK WHEREAS, WAG Partners LLC has submitted an application for approval of the replatting of a series of parcels of land; and WHEREAS, in addition to the request for re-subdivision, the applicant has requested a Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval to amend the existing PUD; and WHEREAS, the final plat and final stage PUD, as amended by the conditions in Exhibit Z of the staff report, will meet design standards and other provisions outlined in the development stage and preliminary plat approvals; and WHEREAS, the proposed project will continue to meet the goals and policies of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 3rd, 2015 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat at its meeting on March 23rd, 2015, approving said applications pursuant to conditions identified in the staff report; and WHEREAS, the applicant has supplied amended documents demonstrating compliance with the terms of the Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD approvals; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello hereby makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. Together with the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the staff report, the application meets the City’s intent for PUD projects as identified in the Zoning Ordinance and the joint Planning Commission/City Council review. 2. The areas of flexibility requested by the applicant are existing conditions and are considered reasonable and consistent with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The details of the Plat, along with the conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the staff report, are consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Monticello City Council hereby approves the proposed Final Plat and the Final Stage Planned Unit Development for Hoglund Bus Park, and the Development Agreement regulating development and completion of required plat improvements, subject to those conditions identified in Exhibit Z of the approval. ADOPTED this 8th day of June, 2015, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL _______________________________ Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator Amend Development Stage PUD & Preliminary Plat - Hoglund Bus Park 155-500-113412 (115 Oakwood Dr. E.), 155-500-113415 (117 Oakwood Dr. E.), 155-500-114302, 155-500-142105, 155-500-142106 Created By: City of Monticello Date Created: 2/19/2015 1 180562v2 (reserved for recording information) AMDENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (Developer Installed Improvements) HOGLUND BUS PARK This AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (“Amendment”) made the ____ day of _________________, 2015, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and WAG PARTNERS, L.L.C., a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). 1. BACKGROUND. The City Council previously approved a Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) as documented by Monticello City Council Minutes dated February 12, 2001. No other documentation of the PUD was prepared or recorded. The City and the Developer desire to establish the PUD zoning by this Amendment and to reflect approval of the plat for HOGLUND BUS PARK. The land is situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, and is legally described on the attached Exhibit A. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on the condition that the Developer enter into this Amendment, record the final plat with the County Recorder or 2 180562v2 Registrar of Titles within 100 days of the date the final plat is approved and provided the Developer abides by the specific conditions, requirements and PUD flexibility as set forth in City Resolution 2015-020, adopted by the Monticello City Council on March 23, 2015, and City Resolution 2015-046 adopted by the Monticello City Council on June 8th, 2015, attached hereto as Exhibit B. 3. ZONING. The PUD District for the property is hereby amended as shown on the Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit C. 4. PUD AGREEMENT AND CONDITIONS. As a condition to the plat approval and this Amendment to PUD, Developer agrees to continue to operate consistent with the approved site plan and further agrees to complete the proper striping and signing for each building, including at least two handicapped parking spaces for each building. 5. MODIFICATIONS. Any modifications or changes to the Site Plan will require an Amendment to the PUD, which amendment must be signed by all parties and recorded with the Wright County Recorder/Registrar of Titles. 6. LOT CORNERS. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this provision, the Developer shall furnish the City with a security in the amount of $750.00. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: Lot Corners/Iron Monuments ($300.00 x 2 x 125%) $ 750.00 7. CITY ADMINISTRATION, PLANNING AND LEGAL EXPENSES, CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. An escrow for City staff administration relating to processing of the plat and associated administration, planning, engineering and legal costs shall be required in the amount of $500.00. This is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. 3 180562v2 8. RECORDING. This Amendment to Development Contract and Planned Unit Development for Hoglund Bus Park shall be recorded with the Wright County Recorder/Registrar of Titles. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Amendment was executed by the parties the day and year first above written. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signatures contained on following pages.] 4 180562v2 CITY: CITY OF MONTICELLO BY: ___________________________________________ Brian Stumpf, Mayor (SEAL) AND __________________________________________ Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of _____________, 2015, by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O’Neill, the Mayor and City Administrator, respectively, of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC 5 180562v2 DEVELOPER: WAG PARTNERS, L.L.C. BY: ___________________________________________ Wayne Hoglund, Its Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _____________, 2015 by Wayne Hoglund the Manager of WAG Partners, L.L.C., a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. ______________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 [JJJ] 6 180562v2 EXHIBIT A TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PUD (Hoglund Bus Park) Legal Description Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Hoglund Bus Park, Wright County, Minnesota. 7 180562v2 EXHIBIT B TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PUD (Hoglund Bus Park) [Attach City Council Resolution] 8 180562v2 EXHIBIT C TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PUD (Hoglund Bus Park) [Attach Site Plan] 9 180562v2 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PUD (Hoglund Bus Park) PREMIER BANK MINNESOTA, a Minnesota Corporation, which holds a mortgage on all of the property more particularly described in the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and PUD, which mortgage is dated April 22, 2008 and recorded April 23, 2008 as Document No. 1086267 with the office of the Wright County Recorder, and which mortgage is subject to a Modification of Mortgage in favor of Premier Bank Minnesota, dated June 26, 2009 and recorded July 6, 2009 as Wright County Document No. 1122340; for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, consented to, and is subject to the foregoing Amendment to Development Contract and PUD.. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2015. PREMIER BANK MINNESOTA By ______________________________________ Casey O. Regan, President and CEO STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________, 2015, by Casey O. Regan, the President and CEO of Premier Bank Minnesota, a Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of said corporation. ________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, P.A. 1380 Corporate Center Curve, #317 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 180998 (Reserved for Recording Data) CONSENT TO PLAT BY MORTGAGEE THIS CONSENT TO PLAT, made as of this _____ day of ____________, 2015, is granted by PREMIER BANK MINNESOTA, a Minnesota Corporation (“Mortgagee”) in favor of WAG PARTNERS, L.L.C., a Minnesota limited liability company (“Developer”). For One Dollar and other good and sufficient consideration, in hand received, the Mortgagee hereby consents to the platting of land in Wright County, Minnesota, legally described on the attached Exhibit “A”, to be known as HOGLUND BUS PARK. PREMIER BANK MINNESOTA By ______________________________________ Casey O. Regan, President and CEO 180998 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________, 2015, by Casey O. Regan, President and CEO of Premier Bank Minnesota, a Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of said corporation. _____________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 180998 EXHIBIT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 181000 1 (Reserved for recording) GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT WAG PARTNERS, L.L.C., a Minnesota limited liability company, “Grantor”, in consideration of One and No/100 Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, its successors and assigns, a permanent easement for public sidewalk purposes over, on, across, under and through the land situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit “A”. INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the permanent easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public sidewalk over, across, on, under, and through the permanent easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain, and excavate the permanent easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public sidewalk. The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement 181000 2 premises; that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the easement premises; and that it will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this document this ____ day of _______________, 2015. GRANTOR: WAG PARTNERS, L.L.C. By: ______________________________________ Wayne Hoglund, Its Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _____________, 2015 by Wayne Hoglund the Manager of WAG Partners, L.L.C., a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. _________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 (JJJ) 181000 3 EXHIBIT “A” TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Legal Description A permanent easement for sidewalk purposes over, under, and across that part of Lot 1, Block 1, Point Minne, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota, said permanent easement is described as follows: Commencing at the westerly most corner of said Lot 1; thence North 33 degrees 27 minutes 59 seconds East, assumed bearing along the northwesterly line thereof, 11.07 feet to the point of beginning of said easement to be hereinafter described; thence South 52 degrees 16 minutes 46 seconds East, 20.20 feet; thence South 74 degrees 38 minutes 14 seconds East, 19.09 feet; thence South 35 degrees 53 minutes 37 seconds East, 7.98 feet; thence South 41 degrees 36 minutes 37 seconds West, perpendicular to the southwesterly line of said Lot 1, 19.05 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 1; thence North 48 degrees 23 minutes 23 seconds West, along said southwesterly line 43.49 feet to the point of beginning, and there terminating. 181000 4 EXHIBIT “A” TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Easement Sketch 181000 4 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO EASEMENT PREMIER BANK MINNESOTA, a Minnesota Corporation, which holds a mortgage on all of the property more particularly described in the foregoing Grant of Permanent Easement, which mortgage is dated April 22, 2008 and recorded April 23, 2008 as Document No. 1086267 with the office of the Wright County Recorder, and which mortgage is subject to a Modification of Mortgage in favor of Premier Bank Minnesota, dated June 26, 2009 and recorded July 6, 2009 as Wright County Document No. 1122340; for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does consent to, and is subject to the foregoing Grant of Permanent Easement. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2015. PREMIER BANK By _________________________________ Casey O. Regan, President and CEO STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________, 2015, by Casey O. Regan, the President and CEO of Premier Bank Minnesota, a Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of said corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, P.A. 1380 Corporate Center Curve, #317 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ County Hwy 75 Chelsea Rd State Hwy 25 85th St NE 9 0th St N E Linn St Pine St 7th St School Blvd Riverview Dr Cedar St W River St M a r v i n R d Jason Ave Dundas Rd W Broadway St Hart Blvd Country La Haug Ave NE Elm St W 4th St Fenning Ave NE Oakwook Dr Ma ll a r d L a 95th St NE Fallon Ave NE Edmonson Ave NE Mississippi Dr 5th St Country Club Rd Sandberg Rd P e l i c a n L a F a l c o n D r Fenning Ave Walnut St Oak Ridge Dr Oriole La Club View Rd Broadway St Hillcrest Rd E River St Headman La M i l l T r a i l L a Falcon Ave NE Wright StBenton St Elwood Rd Ramsey St 6th St River Mill Dr Wildwood Way Hilltop Dr Mill Run Rd O a k V i e w L a Farmstead Ave Martin Dr 4th St E 3rd St E Red Rock La Gillard Ave NE Maple St Fallon Dr Willow St View La E Grey Stone Ave Marvin Elwood Rd Fieldcrest Cir Fairway Dr Jason Ave NE Vine St M e a d o w L a Jerry Liefert Dr Praire Rd Starling Dr Palm St Un kn ow n o r N o S tree tn ame Fallon Ave Golf Course Rd Falcon Ave Kevin Longley Dr Craig La R e d O a k L a Front St 5th St W Thomas Park D r Locust St M o c k i n g b i r d L a W 3rd St Ea s two o d C i r Bri ar Oa ks Bl v d F a r m s t e a d D r Henipin St E i d e r L a Dayton St Oak La River Forest Dr Meadow Oak Ave Kampa Cir O a k R i d g e C i r M i l l C t R i v e r R i d ge L a Garrison Ave Oakview Ct Dundas Cir Kenneth La Otter Creek Rd Minnesota St Eagle Cir Crocus La Meadow Oak La Stone Ridge Dr Chestnut St 1 2 0 t h S t N E Darrow Ave NE Diamond Dr Pebble Brook Dr Widgeon La Washington St Bunker Cir Homestead Dr Thomas Cir E n d i c o t t T r Center Cir Oak View Cir Sandtrap Cir Countr y Cir Cheyen Ct Old Territoral Rd Tanager Cir Hillcrest Cir Os prey Ct Acorn Cir Balboul Cir S w allo w C ir R iv e r si d e C ir Meadow Oak Ct Matthew Cir E Oak Dr S t o n e R i d g e C ir Oakwood Dr Meadow Oak Ave NE County Hwy 75 Hart Blvd Marvin Rd Marvin Rd Wright St 90th St NE Cedar St Minnesota St 01 City of MonticelloOfficial Zoning Map 10-10-14 :Legend BASE ZONING DISTRICTS Residential Districts -- Low Residential Densities -- Medium Residential Densities -- High Residential De nsities Business Districts Industrial Districts OTHER Water A-O R-A R-1 T-N R-2 R-PUD R-3 R-4 B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 CCD IBC I-1 I-2 M-H Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District OVERLAY DISTRICTS Performance Based Overlay District ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !!!!! Shoreland District Special Use Overlay District ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !!!!! Freeway Bonus Sign District PUDs Swan River01 CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 1 2I.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-036Aapprovinganassessment agreementwithNorthernStatesPower,dbaXcelEnergyforFirstLakeSubstation (CS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: CouncilisaskedtoadoptResolution#2015-036Aapprovinganassessmentagreement betweenNorthernStatesPower,dbaXcelEnergyandtheCityofMonticello.This housekeepingactionwillformalizetheactiontakenbyCouncilonApril27,2015, approvingadeferredassessmentagreementwithXcelEnergy.Inorderforassessment agreementstobecertifiedandturnedovertotheWrightCountyAuditor’sOfficefor futureassessment,itisrequiredbyMNStateStatutestoadopttheseagreementsby resolution.Followingcouncilactiontoadopttheresolution,citystaffcanthenforward thenecessarydocumentstotheCountyAuditorforinclusionintheassessmentrollsasa deferredassessment. A1.BudgetImpact:NA A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:NA B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2015-036Aapprovinganassessmentagreementwith NorthernStatesPower,dbaXcelEnergyforFirstLakeSubstation. 2.Motionofother. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2015-036A Copyofapprovedassessmentagreement(recordedasof5/21/15) CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-036A APPROVING AGREEMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND WAIVER OF IRREGULARITY AND APPEAL FOR NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, DBA XCEL ENERGY FOR THE FIRST LAKE SUBSTATION PROPERTY, A 10-ACRE PORTION OF PID 213-100-103300 (TO BE PLATTED) WHEREAS, Northern States Power Company, DBA Xcel Energy wishes to enter into an assessment agreement for property legally defined as follows: The North 544.51 feet of the West 799.29 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 121 North, Range 25 West, Wright County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, an assessment agreement has been executed as shown in Attachment “A”; and WHEREAS, said assessment agreement contains an allowance for deferral of the assessment until such time as the Subject Property is provided with municipal services including road, sidewalk, street lighting, sanitary sewer, water, and utilities; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: that the City Council approves the Agreement of Assessment and Waiver of Irregularity and Appeal for said property under the terms stated in the agreement. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 8th day of June, 2015. CITY OF MONTICELLO ___________________________ Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ Kerry Burri, Interim City Clerk ATTACHMENT “A” AGREEMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND WAIVER OF IRREGULARITY AND APPEAL For First Lake Substation Property owned by Northern States Power DBA Excel Energy CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 1 2J.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution2015-044approvingarequestforan AmendmenttoDevelopmentStagePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)andFinal StagePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)forasinglelotcommercialdevelopmentin aB-4(RegionalBusiness)District.Applicant:MFMonticello,LLC(NAC) Property:Parcel#155205001030(noaddressassigned) Lot3,Block1,UnionCrossingsSecondAddition Thesubjectsiteislocatedinthenorthwestquadrantofthe Interstate94/CountyRoad18interchange,northof7th StreetEastandwestofFenningAvenueNortheast.The siteispresentlyvacant. PlanningCaseNumber:2015-020 A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND Request(s):PlannedUnitDevelopmentAmendment–Development andFinalStage DeadlineforDecision:July7,2015 LandUseDesignation:PlacestoShop ZoningDesignation:B-4,RegionalBusinessDistrict ThepurposeoftheB-4,RegionalBusinessDistrictisto providefortheestablishmentofcommercialandservice activitieswhichdrawfromandservecustomersfromthe entirecommunityorregion. CurrentSiteUse:VacantProperty/MattressFirmretailsalesstore(approved viaseparateamendmenttoCUPforPlannedUnit DevelopmentonMarch23,2015). SurroundingLandUses: North:Commercialretail,zonedB-4,RegionalBusiness South:Interstate94/vacantproperty,zoned,B-2,Limited Business Dr a f t O n l y CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 2 East:Interstate94interchange,zoned,A/O,AgriculturalOpen SpaceandI-2,HeavyIndustrial West:Commercialretail,zonedB-4,RegionalBusiness ProjectDescription:Therequestedamendmentinvolvestheadditionofa2,188 squarefootretailcellularsalesstoreuponthesubject 40,772squarefootsite.Thestoreisproposedtooccupy thenorthernone-thirdofthesite. OrdinanceRequirements:AConditionalUsePermitforPlannedUnitDevelopment (PUD)iscurrentlyinplaceforthesubjectsite.ThecurrentPUDprovideslandfor existingandfutureretailusers,withtheexpectationthatvariouspartsofthepropertywill bedevelopedovertime.TheoriginalPUDidentifiedconceptualsiteuse,requiringPUD amendmentstooccurasnewusersthatvaryfromtheinitialplanareidentified.This amendmentisproposedtoaccommodateasecondretailfacility,locatedinlinetothe proposedMattressFirm,approvedviaanamendmenttoCUPforPUDearlierin2015. TheCityCouncil’sreviewincludesboththedevelopmentandfinalstagePUDofthis expansionforthesecondtenant.Thedevelopmentparcelwaspreviouslyplattedandno plattingorsubdivisionreviewisrequired. LandUse.ThesubjectsiteiszonedB-4,RegionalBusiness,whichlists“commercial retailuses”asapermitteduse.Theproposedstoreisexpectedtodrawfromandserve customersfromtheentirecommunityorregion.Inthisregard,theproposedcellularsales storeisconsistentwiththeintentoftheB-4District. Off-StreetParking.Withtheadditionof2,188squarefeet,11additionalparkingspaces willbeneededforatotalof32spaceswhenconsideredincombinationwiththe previouslyapprovedMattressFirmstore.Asdrawn,theapplicanthasincluded45 parkingspacesinsonoadditionalparkingspaceswillberequired.Becausethesiteis servedwithanexcessparkingsupply,thestaffwouldencouragetheapplicanttoconsider removing9parkingspacesalongthenorthsideofthepropertyandreplacewithgreen space.Althoughthisiscondition,thelanguageiswrittenaspermissive.Theapplicant maywishtokeepthestallsfortenant’sowninternalparkingrequirements. BuildingMaterials.Asshownonthesubmittedbuildingelevations,thebuildingistobe finishedinacombinationofsplit-facedmasonry(atthebaseofthebaseofthestructure) andanexteriorinsulatingfinishingsystem(EIFS).Thebaseofthebuildingistobe “JaredTan”incolorwhiletheupperthree-quartersofthebuildingistobe“Jefferson House.”Fabricawnings(red)areproposedabovewindowsanddoorways. Dr a f t O n l y CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 3 Allproposedbuildingfinishmaterialsareconsistentwiththematerialrequirementsofthe OrdinanceandtheoriginalPUDapprovals. Signage.Therenderingshowsonewallsignlocatedontheandeastbuildingelevation overtheentrydoorfortheAT&Tstore.Thesignisnotdimensioned,butappearstobe approximately80squarefeetinarea,about10percentofthetenantbuildingwallarea. Theareaofsuchsignappearstofallwithinthemaximumarearequirementsallowedby Ordinance.AsaconditionofPUDamendmentapproval,thelocation,sizeanddesignof allsignsuponthesubjectpropertymustbeverifiedandfoundtobeconsistentwiththe previouslyapprovedmastersignplan. FreestandingsignageonthesitehasbeenapprovedundertheoriginalPlannedUnit DevelopmentapprovalforUnionCrossings,andisnotproposedtochangewiththis amendment. Grading,DrainageandUtilities.Asrequired,theapplicanthassubmittedagrading anddrainageplanandautilityplanforreview.AsaconditionofPUDamendment approval,theplansshouldbesubjecttoreviewandapprovalbytheCityEngineer.The Engineerhasprovidedthefollowingspecificcommentsrelatedtothisamendment: a.Sanitarysewerservicestobothbuildingsshouldhavewyeconnectionstothemain. Servicesarenotallowedtodirectlyconnecttoamanhole. b.Waterservicestobothbuildingsshouldincludeacurbstopandboxwhereitteesto themainwithintheeasement.ThiswillallowtheCitytoshutoffthewaterseparately ifnecessary. c.Moredetailshouldbeprovidedonthegradingplanforthenortherlyaccessdriveand parkingareatoensuredrainageisbeingaccommodated.Spotelevationswith drainagearrowsshallbeshownonthegradingplantoshowhowdrainagewilltie intotheexistingroadway. PUDAmendmentCriteria.InconsideringanamendmenttotheUnionCrossingsPUD, theCitymustconsiderwhethertheproposedamendmentaffectsthePUD’sabilityto continuetoachievePUDgoalsoutlinedbyCode.Specifically,adeterminationshouldbe madewhethertheamendmentsupportshigherstandardsofsiteandbuildingdesign, efficientuseofland,amoredesirableenvironmentthanpossiblethroughstrict applicationofthezoningregulations,andinnovativedevelopmentoptionsatalllevels. Inthisregard,itisnotanticipatedthatapprovaloftheamendmentwillnegatively impactsthehealthandsafetyoftheCity. Dr a f t O n l y CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 4 PLANNINGCOMMISSIONREVIEWANDRECOMMENDATION ThePlanningCommissionreviewedthedevelopmentstageapplicationduringtheir regularmeetingonJune2nd,2015.TheCommissionhadnoconcernswiththeproposed additionaltenantspaceandamendedPUD.TheCommissionheldahearingonthe request.Nopublicwaspresenttooffertestimony. TheCommissionunanimouslyrecommendedtheamendmentasproposedwiththose conditionslistedinExhibitZ. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS ThePlanningCommissionunanimouslyrecommendsalternative1below. 1.MotiontoapproveResolution2015-044approvingtheDevelopmentandFinal StagePlannedUnitDevelopmentAmendmentforLot3,Block1,Union CrossingsSecondAddition,contingentoncompliancewiththoseconditions specifiedinExhibitZ. 2.MotiontodenyResolution2015-044forapprovaloftheDevelopmentandFinal StagePlannedUnitDevelopmentAmendment,basedonfindingstobemadeby thePlanningCommission. 3.Motiontotableactionontherequest,pendingadditionalinformationasidentified bytheCityCouncil. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION StaffbelievesthattherequestedPUDamendmentisconsistentwiththeCity’soverall developmentobjectivesforthearea,aswellaswiththeanticipateddevelopmentofthe parcelwhentheoriginalprojectwasapprovedearlierthisyear.Withthisinmind,Staff recommendsapprovaloftheamendmentsubjecttotheconditionslistedinExhibitZ. D.SUPPORTINGDATA A.Resolution2015-044 B.ResolutionPC-2015-010 C.AerialImages D.ApplicantNarrative E.ZoningMap F.SiteVicinity G.SitePlan H.Grading,DrainageandErosionControlPlan Dr a f t O n l y CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 5 I.UtilityPlan J.LandscapePlan K.Details L.LightingPlans M.BuildingElevations N.SignPlans–UnionCrossings O.SignImageIllustration Z.ConditionsofApproval Dr a f t O n l y CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 6 ExhibitZ ConditionsofApproval AT&TRetailStore PlannedUnitDevelopmentAmendment 1.AllpreviousconditionsrelatedtotheMattressFirmapprovalremaininplace. 2.Theapplicantconsiderremoving9parkingstallsonthenorthsideofthepropertyand replacethemwithgreenspace. 3.SignagefortheAT&TfacilityisverifiedforcompliancewiththeCity’sSign Ordinance. 4.CommentsfromtheCityEngineer: a.Sanitarysewerservicestobothbuildingsshouldhavewyeconnectionstothe main.Servicesarenotallowedtodirectlyconnecttoamanhole. b.Waterservicestobothbuildingsshouldincludeacurbstopandboxwhereittees tothemainwithintheeasement.ThiswillallowtheCitytoshutoffthewaterif necessary. c.Moredetailshouldbeprovidedonthegradingplanforthenortherlyaccessdrive andparkingareatoensuredrainageisbeingaccommodated.Spotelevationswith drainagearrowsshallbeshownonthegradingplantoshowhowdrainagewilltie intotheexistingroadway. 5.CommentsofotherCityStaff.Dr a f t O n l y CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-044 APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT RELATING TO THE UNION CROSSINGS RETAIL PROJECT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN AT&T WIRELESS RETAIL STORE LOT 3, BLOCK 1, UNION CROSSINGS SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant has a property interest in Lot 3, Block 1, Union Crossings 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, the subject property is a part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) governing the uses and development of the parcel; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to amend the PUD to accommodate the development of a portion of said Lot 3, Block 1; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned B-4, Regional Business District, in which the proposed store is a permitted use; and WHEREAS, the proposed development amendment is consistent with the requirements and intent of the applicable zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed development amendment is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed development amendment is consistent with the general intent of the Union Crossings PUD approvals; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the matter at its regular meeting on June 2nd, 2015 and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed subdivision amendment is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed subdivision amendment creates lots that meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. Dr a f t O n l y 3. The proposed development amendment is consistent with the intent and approvals of the Union Crossings PUD. 4. The proposed development amendment will not create undue burdens on public systems, including streets and utilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the proposed subdivision amendment is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit Z of the staff report on the matter as follows. 1. All previous conditions related to the Mattress Firm approval remain in place. 2. The applicant consider removing 9 parking stalls on the north side of the property and replace them with green space. 3. Signage for the AT&T facility is verified for compliance with the City’s Sign Ordinance. 4. Comments from the City Engineer: a. Sanitary sewer services to both buildings should have wye connections to the main. Services are not allowed to directly connect to a manhole. b. Water services to both buildings should include a curb stop and box where it tees to the main within the easement. This will allow the City to shut off the water if necessary. c. More detail should be provided on the grading plan for the northerly access drive and parking area to ensure drainage is being accommodated. Spot elevations with drainage arrows shall be shown on the grading plan to show how drainage will tie into the existing roadway. 5. Comments of other City Staff. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 8th day of June, 2015. CITY OF MONTICELLO ___________________________ Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Kerry Burri, Interim City Clerk Dr a f t O n l y Dr a f t O n l y Dr a f t O n l y Draft Only Dr a f t O n l y County Hwy 75 Chelsea Rd State Hwy 25 85th St NE 9 0th St N E Linn St Pine St 7th St School Blvd Riverview Dr Cedar St W River St M a r v i n R d Jason Ave Dundas Rd W Broadway St Hart Blvd Country La Haug Ave NE Elm St W 4th St Fenning Ave NE Oakwook Dr Ma ll a r d L a 95th St NE Fallon Ave NE Edmonson Ave NE Mississippi Dr 5th St Country Club Rd Sandberg Rd P e l i c a n L a F a l c o n D r Fenning Ave Walnut St Oak Ridge Dr Oriole La Club View Rd Broadway St Hillcrest Rd E River St Headman La M i l l T r a i l L a Falcon Ave NE Wright StBenton St Elwood Rd Ramsey St 6th St River Mill Dr Wildwood Way Hilltop Dr Mill Run Rd O a k V i e w L a Farmstead Ave Martin Dr 4th St E 3rd St E Red Rock La Gillard Ave NE Maple St Fallon Dr Willow St View La E Grey Stone Ave Marvin Elwood Rd Fieldcrest Cir Fairway Dr Jason Ave NE Vine St M e a d o w L a Jerry Liefert Dr Praire Rd Starling Dr Palm St Un kn ow n o r N o S tree tn ame Fallon Ave Golf Course Rd Falcon Ave Kevin Longley Dr Craig La R e d O a k L a Front St 5th St W Thomas Park D r Locust St M o c k i n g b i r d L a W 3rd St Ea s t wo o d C i r Bri ar Oa ks Bl v d F a r m s t e a d D r Henipin St E i d e r L a Dayton St Oak La River Forest Dr Meadow Oak Ave Kampa Cir O a k R i d g e C i r M i l l C t R i v e r R i d ge L a Garrison Ave Oakview Ct Dundas Cir Kenneth La Otter Creek Rd Minnesota St Eagle Cir Crocus La Meadow Oak La Stone Ridge Dr Chestnut St 1 2 0 t h S t N E Darrow Ave NE Diamond Dr Pebble Brook Dr Widgeon La Washington St Bunker Cir Homestead Dr Thomas Cir E n d i c o t t T r Center Cir Oak View Cir Sandtrap Cir Countr y Cir Cheyen Ct Old Territoral Rd Tanager Cir Hillcrest Cir Os prey C t Acorn Cir Balboul Cir S w allo w C ir R iv e r si d e C ir Meadow Oak Ct Matthew Cir E Oak Dr S t o n e R i d g e C ir Oakwood Dr Meadow Oak Ave NE County Hwy 75 Hart Blvd Marvin Rd Marvin Rd Wright St 90th St NE Cedar St Minnesota St 01 City of MonticelloOfficial Zoning Map 10-10-14 :Legend BASE ZONING DISTRICTS Residential Districts -- Low Residential Densities -- Medium Residential Densities -- High Residential Densities Business Districts Industrial Districts OTHER Water A-O R-A R-1 T-N R-2 R-PUD R-3 R-4 B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 CCD IBC I-1 I-2 M-H Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District OVERLAY DISTRICTS Performance Based Overlay District ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !!!!! Shoreland District Special Use Overlay District ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !!!!! Freeway Bonus Sign District PUDs Swan River01 Dr a f t O n l y 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE1-888-937-5150 Dr a f t O n l y 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE1-888-937-5150 x x x x x x x x x x x x x Dr a f t O n l y 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE1-888-937-5150 Dr a f t O n l y 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE1-888-937-5150 Dr a f t O n l y 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE1-888-937-5150 Dr a f t O n l y 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE1-888-937-5150 Dr a f t O n l y 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE1-888-937-5150 Dr a f t O n l y Lu m i n a i r e S c h e d u l e Sy m b o l Qt y La b e l Ar r a n g e m e n t To t a l L a m p L u m e n s LL F De s c r i p t i o n Lu m . W a t t s 3 CC SI N G L E 30 0 0 0 0. 7 5 0 CO O P E R G S M - X X - 3 2 0 - M P - X X - 5 S - F G - B Z - L O N 2 0 ' P O L E W / 2 ' B A S E 35 0 4 BB SI N G L E 30 0 0 0 0. 7 5 0 CO O P E R G S M - A I S - 3 2 0 - M P - M T - S L - F G - B Z - L 2 0 ' P O L E W / 2 ' BA S E 35 0 21 AA SI N G L E N. A . 0. 9 0 0 CO O P E R X T O R 2 A @ 9 ' 21 . 4 1 EX I S T I N G P O L E BA C K - B A C K 40 0 0 0 0. 7 5 0 MA Y N O T B E E X A C T P E R W H A T I S I N S T A L L E D 45 2 Ca l c u l a t i o n S u m m a r y La b e l Ca l c T y p e Un i t s Av g Ma x Mi n Av g / M i n Ma x / M i n CA L C P O I N T S Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 0. 7 6 13 . 3 0. 0 N. A . N. A . PR O P E R T Y L I N E Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 0. 7 5 4. 1 0. 0 N. A . N. A . FR O N T E N T R A N C E Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 5. 6 0 5. 9 5. 4 1. 0 4 1. 0 9 NO R T H L O T Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 3. 2 0 5. 8 1. 0 3. 2 0 5. 8 0 PA R K I N G L O T Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 4. 6 1 6. 7 1. 5 3. 0 7 4. 4 7 pa r k i n g p e r i m e t e r Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 4. 1 1 6. 7 1. 3 3. 1 6 5. 1 5 4, 1 7 9 G R O S S S F 3, 8 6 5 N E T S F RE T A I L 1 RE T A I L 2 2, 1 8 8 G R O S S S F 1, 9 4 7 N E T S F 11 11 7 7 9 FR O N T E N T R A N C E Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 5 . 6 0 Ma x i m u m = 5 . 9 Mi n i m u m = 5 . 4 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 1 . 0 4 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 1 . 0 9 FR O N T E N T R A N C E Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 5 . 6 0 Ma x i m u m = 5 . 9 Mi n i m u m = 5 . 4 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 1 . 0 4 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 1 . 0 9 Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 3 . 2 0 NO R T H L O T Ma x i m u m = 5 . 8 Mi n i m u m = 1 . 0 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 3 . 2 0 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 5 . 8 0 Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 3 . 2 0 NO R T H L O T Ma x i m u m = 5 . 8 Mi n i m u m = 1 . 0 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 3 . 2 0 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 5 . 8 0 PA R K I N G L O T Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 4 . 6 1 Ma x i m u m = 6 . 7 Mi n i m u m = 1 . 5 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 3 . 0 7 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 4 . 4 7 PA R K I N G L O T Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 4 . 6 1 Ma x i m u m = 6 . 7 Mi n i m u m = 1 . 5 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 3 . 0 7 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 4 . 4 7 pa r k i n g p e r i m e t e r Av e r a g e = 4 . 1 1 Ma x i m u m = 6 . 7 Mi n i m u m = 1 . 3 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 3 . 1 6 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 5 . 1 5 Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) pa r k i n g p e r i m e t e r Av e r a g e = 4 . 1 1 Ma x i m u m = 6 . 7 Mi n i m u m = 1 . 3 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 3 . 1 6 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 5 . 1 5 Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 1 . 2 1. 4 2. 5 4. 4 5 . 1 3. 9 2 . 2 1. 4 0. 8 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 3 0 . 5 1. 5 2. 5 3 . 8 4. 7 5. 6 6 . 6 5 . 6 4 . 3 2 . 7 1. 4 0. 8 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 7 1. 1 4. 3 5 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 7 5 . 9 5 . 6 4. 4 4. 2 2 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 4 . 2 5 . 0 5 . 9 5 . 6 6 . 1 5 . 2 4 . 8 4. 4 3. 8 3 . 0 2 . 4 1. 7 1. 3 0 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 3 1. 5 4 . 5 5 . 7 5. 2 5. 1 5 . 1 4 . 4 4. 3 4 . 0 3 . 9 3 . 2 2 . 9 2 . 3 2 . 0 1. 1 0. 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 6 1. 4 3. 3 4. 5 4 . 1 4. 6 3 . 6 3 . 7 4 . 0 4 . 6 4 . 8 4 . 2 3 . 9 4 . 0 3 . 2 2 . 6 0 . 9 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 6 1 . 2 3 . 0 3 . 8 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 5 . 1 5 . 8 8 . 5 8 . 0 5 . 9 4 . 9 5 . 6 5. 5 5 . 4 2. 7 1 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 1 . 3 3 . 1 4. 5 5 . 5 5. 9 6 . 6 6 . 9 4 . 6 1 1 . 8 7 . 0 5 . 6 5. 7 6. 0 6 . 5 5 . 6 1 . 3 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 1 . 9 8 . 1 5. 5 9. 5 6 . 5 5 . 8 6 . 0 5 . 9 6 . 6 5 . 9 3 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 4 2 . 2 7 . 1 5. 8 6 . 2 5. 5 5. 8 5 . 6 5 . 8 5. 4 2. 9 1 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 3 1 . 7 6 . 0 6. 2 6 . 9 5 . 9 5. 4 5 . 7 5 . 5 5. 2 3 . 5 1 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 1 . 1 4 . 2 9. 9 7 . 0 5 . 2 5 . 3 5 . 2 5. 4 4 . 7 2. 7 1 . 1 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 6 2 . 6 10 . 1 7. 4 5. 2 5 . 0 5 . 2 5. 5 5 . 5 5. 2 2 . 3 0 . 6 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 2 9. 9 7 . 0 5. 4 5. 0 5 . 2 5 . 2 5. 7 5. 3 4 . 6 0 . 9 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 7. 5 7 . 4 5. 6 5 . 2 4 . 8 5 . 3 5. 4 5. 9 4. 4 0. 7 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 6 2 . 9 5. 8 1 0 . 6 6 . 2 4 . 8 4. 7 4. 8 5 . 0 5 . 1 2 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 9 3 . 7 5. 6 7 . 9 9 . 2 6 . 4 4 . 6 4 . 3 4 . 2 4 . 3 4 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 0 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 7 3 . 7 1 3 . 3 4 . 8 7. 4 5. 6 5 . 6 5 . 1 5 . 3 5 . 6 5 . 8 5 . 3 4 . 2 3 . 7 3 . 6 3 . 2 2 . 5 1 . 4 0 . 8 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0. 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 1 . 6 3 . 6 2 . 9 3 . 2 2 . 7 3 . 0 3 . 0 3 . 3 3 . 8 4 . 3 4 . 3 3 . 6 3 . 3 3 . 0 2 . 5 1 . 7 1 . 1 0 . 6 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 6 1 . 0 1 . 3 1 . 7 1 . 9 2 . 3 2 . 9 3 . 3 4 . 1 4 . 2 4 . 0 3 . 6 3 . 2 2 . 6 2 . 1 1 . 4 0 . 9 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 7 1 . 0 1 . 4 1 . 9 2 . 6 3 . 1 3 . 7 2 . 4 3 . 9 3 . 9 3 . 6 2 . 9 2 . 4 1 . 7 1 . 2 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 9 1 . 3 2 . 1 2 . 6 3 . 4 4 . 1 4. 7 5. 0 4. 5 3. 8 3 . 1 2 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 1 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 1 . 0 1 . 3 2 . 1 2 . 8 3 . 7 5 . 0 6 . 3 6 . 7 5 . 9 4 . 2 3 . 3 2 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 1 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 6 0 . 9 1 . 2 2 . 0 3 . 0 3 . 8 5 . 2 6 . 7 6 . 9 5 . 9 4 . 1 3 . 2 2 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 1 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 8 1 . 1 1 . 8 2 . 7 3 . 3 4 . 2 5 . 0 2 . 6 4 . 2 3 . 4 2 . 8 2 . 2 1 . 4 1 . 0 0 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 8 1 . 1 1 . 4 2 . 2 2 . 7 3 . 1 3 . 3 1 . 6 3 . 1 2 . 9 2 . 2 2 . 0 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 7 1 . 0 1 . 3 1 . 9 2 . 1 2 . 4 2 . 7 1 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 1 1 . 9 1 . 4 1 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 3 0. 4 0. 9 0. 9 0. 9 0. 9 0. 9 0. 8 0. 6 0. 5 0. 5 0. 4 0. 4 0. 2 0. 2 0. 2 0. 2 0. 2 0. 2 0. 3 0. 3 0. 2 0. 2 0. 2 0. 1 0. 1 0. 2 0. 3 0. 5 0. 9 1. 3 1. 9 2. 4 3. 1 3. 4 3. 8 4. 1 2. 5 4. 1 3. 7 3. 1 2. 4 1. 5 1. 1 0. 8 0. 5 0. 3 0. 3 0. 3 0. 4 0. 5 0. 5 0. 5 0. 3 0. 1 0. 2 0. 4 0. 5 0. 6 0. 6 0. 5 0. 4 0. 4 0. 3 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 3, 8 6 5 N E T S F RE T A I L 1 4, 1 7 9 G R O S S S F RE T A I L 2 2, 2 8 4 G R O S S S F 2, 0 3 3 N E T S F 11 9 11 7 7 SI T E PH O T O M E T R I C P L A N OP T I O N B E0 - 1 B Ha r r i s s A s s o c i a t e s , L L C 51 5 N W a s h i n g t o n A v e Su i t e 2 0 0 C Mi n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 0 1 HA RE T A I L BU I L D I N G MO N T I C E L L O , M N MO N T I C E L L O , M N CI T Y SU B M I T T A L DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . Draft Only Lu m i n a i r e S c h e d u l e Sy m b o l Qt y La b e l Ar r a n g e m e n t To t a l L a m p L u m e n s LL F De s c r i p t i o n Lu m . W a t t s 3 CC SI N G L E 30 0 0 0 0. 7 5 0 CO O P E R G S M - X X - 3 2 0 - M P - X X - 5 S - F G - B Z - L O N 2 0 ' P O L E W / 2 ' B A S E 35 0 4 BB SI N G L E 30 0 0 0 0. 7 5 0 CO O P E R G S M - A I S - 3 2 0 - M P - M T - S L - F G - B Z - L 2 0 ' P O L E W / 2 ' BA S E 35 0 21 AA SI N G L E N. A . 0. 9 0 0 CO O P E R X T O R 2 A @ 9 ' 21 . 4 Ca l c u l a t i o n S u m m a r y La b e l Ca l c T y p e Un i t s Av g Ma x Mi n Av g / M i n Ma x / M i n CA L C P O I N T S Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 1. 6 7 11 . 8 0. 0 N. A . N. A . PR O P E R T Y L I N E Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 0. 3 3 1. 0 0. 0 N. A . N. A . FR O N T E N T R A N C E Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 5. 5 0 5. 9 5. 2 1. 0 6 1. 1 3 NO R T H L O T Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 1. 8 7 4. 7 0. 1 18 . 7 0 47 . 0 0 PA R K I N G L O T Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 4. 5 2 6. 9 1. 4 3. 2 3 4. 9 3 pa r k i n g p e r i m e t e r Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 4. 0 2 6. 7 1. 2 3. 3 5 5. 5 8 4, 1 7 9 G R O S S S F 3, 8 6 5 N E T S F RE T A I L 1 RE T A I L 2 2, 1 8 8 G R O S S S F 1, 9 4 7 N E T S F 11 11 7 7 9 FR O N T E N T R A N C E Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 5 . 5 0 Ma x i m u m = 5 . 9 Mi n i m u m = 5 . 2 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 1 . 0 6 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 1 . 1 3 FR O N T E N T R A N C E Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 5 . 5 0 Ma x i m u m = 5 . 9 Mi n i m u m = 5 . 2 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 1 . 0 6 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 1 . 1 3 Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 1 . 8 7 NO R T H L O T Ma x i m u m = 4 . 7 Mi n i m u m = 0 . 1 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 1 8 . 7 0 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 4 7 . 0 0 Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 1 . 8 7 NO R T H L O T Ma x i m u m = 4 . 7 Mi n i m u m = 0 . 1 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 1 8 . 7 0 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 4 7 . 0 0 PA R K I N G L O T Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 4 . 5 2 Ma x i m u m = 6 . 9 Mi n i m u m = 1 . 4 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 3 . 2 3 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 4 . 9 3 PA R K I N G L O T Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 4 . 5 2 Ma x i m u m = 6 . 9 Mi n i m u m = 1 . 4 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 3 . 2 3 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 4 . 9 3 pa r k i n g p e r i m e t e r Av e r a g e = 4 . 0 2 Ma x i m u m = 6 . 7 Mi n i m u m = 1 . 2 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 3 . 3 5 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 5 . 5 8 Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) pa r k i n g p e r i m e t e r Av e r a g e = 4 . 0 2 Ma x i m u m = 6 . 7 Mi n i m u m = 1 . 2 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 3 . 3 5 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 5 . 5 8 Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0. 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 3 0. 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 1 . 3 1. 5 2. 6 4 . 6 5 . 0 3 . 9 2 . 2 1. 4 0. 8 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 3 0 . 5 1 . 6 2 . 5 3 . 9 4 . 8 5 . 6 6 . 6 5. 5 4. 2 2 . 6 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 7 1 . 2 4 . 3 5 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 7 5 . 9 5. 5 4 . 4 4. 2 2 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 3 0 . 5 4. 4 5. 0 5 . 9 5. 7 6. 1 5 . 2 4 . 8 4. 4 3. 8 3 . 0 2 . 3 1. 7 1. 3 0 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 3 1 . 6 4 . 6 5. 7 5. 2 5. 1 5. 0 4. 4 4. 3 4 . 0 3 . 8 3 . 2 2 . 9 2 . 3 1 . 9 1 . 0 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 6 1. 5 3. 4 4. 5 4 . 1 4. 6 3 . 6 3 . 8 4 . 0 4 . 6 4 . 8 4 . 2 3 . 9 4 . 0 3 . 1 2 . 5 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 6 1 . 3 3 . 1 3 . 8 3 . 9 4 . 0 4 . 0 5 . 2 5 . 8 8 . 5 7 . 9 5 . 8 4 . 9 5. 7 5. 6 5 . 3 2 . 5 1 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 1 . 3 3 . 2 4 . 6 5. 5 6. 1 6 . 4 7 . 2 4. 5 11 . 6 6 . 8 5 . 6 5 . 6 6 . 1 6 . 3 5. 5 1. 2 0 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 2 . 1 8 . 4 5. 4 9. 3 6 . 4 5 . 8 6 . 0 5 . 9 6 . 5 5 . 8 2 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 5 2 . 4 7 . 1 5. 9 6 . 1 5. 4 5. 9 5 . 6 5 . 8 5 . 3 2 . 7 1 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 4 1 . 8 6 . 3 6. 3 6 . 9 5 . 9 5. 4 5 . 7 5 . 5 5. 2 3 . 3 1 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 1 . 2 4. 4 11 . 1 9 . 7 6 . 9 5 . 1 5 . 3 5 . 2 5. 4 4. 6 2 . 6 1 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 6 2 . 7 9. 9 7 . 2 5 . 0 4 . 9 5 . 2 5. 5 5 . 5 5. 1 2 . 0 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 2 9. 5 6 . 7 5 . 1 4 . 8 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 . 6 5 . 1 4 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 7. 3 7 . 0 5 . 2 4 . 8 4. 4 5. 0 5 . 2 5. 5 4. 2 0 . 6 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 7 3 . 1 11 . 8 9 . 7 5. 5 4. 2 4 . 1 4. 4 4. 6 4. 7 2. 6 0 . 7 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 8 3 . 9 4. 5 6. 6 8 . 1 5. 4 3. 6 3 . 4 3 . 4 3 . 7 3 . 5 1 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 6 3 . 7 6 . 3 4 . 2 6 . 1 4. 7 4. 2 4 . 0 4 . 0 4. 4 4 . 7 4. 0 3 . 0 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 4 1 . 9 1 . 0 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 3 1 . 4 3 . 1 2 . 1 2 . 1 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 9 2 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 6 2. 1 2 . 0 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 0 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 1 . 2 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 7 1. 4 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 6 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 0 . 9 0. 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0. 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0. 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 3 0. 4 0. 9 0. 9 0. 9 0. 9 0. 9 0. 8 0. 6 0. 5 0. 5 0. 4 0. 3 0. 2 0. 1 0. 1 0. 2 0. 2 0. 2 0. 2 0. 2 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 0 0. 1 0. 1 0. 3 0. 4 0. 6 0. 8 1. 0 1. 0 0. 9 0. 8 0. 8 0. 7 0. 6 0. 6 0. 4 0. 2 0. 1 0. 1 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 1 0. 1 0. 3 0. 4 0. 4 0. 2 0. 1 0. 2 0. 4 0. 5 0. 6 0. 6 0. 5 0. 4 0. 4 0. 3 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 SI T E PH O T O M E T R I C P L A N OP T I O N A E0 - 1 A Ha r r i s s A s s o c i a t e s , L L C 51 5 N W a s h i n g t o n A v e Su i t e 2 0 0 C Mi n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 0 1 HA RE T A I L BU I L D I N G MO N T I C E L L O , M N MO N T I C E L L O , M N CI T Y SU B M I T T A L DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . Draft Only Draft Only Draft Only Draft Only Draft Only Draft Only Draft Only Draft Only Draft Only Draft Only Draft Only Draft Only Dr a f t O n l y Dr a f t O n l y Dr a f t O n l y CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 1 2K.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinanceNo.616forAmendmentstotheMonticello ZoningOrdinance,Chapter5,Section3–AccessoryUseStandardsandChapter8, Section4–Definitions,asrelatedtoregulationsforAccessoryBuilding-Majorand AccessoryBuilding–Minor.Applicant:CityofMonticello (AS) PlanningCaseNumber:2015-021 A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND Request(s):AmendmentstothetextoftheMonticelloZoning Ordinance DeadlineforDecision:NA LandUseDesignation:Varies ZoningDesignation:Varies ANALYSIS TheCityCouncilisaskedtoconsideramendmentstotheMonticelloZoningOrdinance relatedtothesizeof“AccessoryBuildings–Minor”. TheproposedamendmentsarearesultofarecentchangetotheMinnesotaStateBuilding Code,whichadjustedtherequirementforbuildingpermitondetachedaccessorystructure from120squarefeetto200squarefeet. Atpresent,theMonticelloZoningOrdinanceisconsistentwiththepriorbuildingcode, statingthat“AccessoryBuildings,Minor”are120squarefeetorless. Theproposedordinanceamendmentswouldthereforeadjusttheaccessoryusetableand definitionstoaddresstheincreaseinsizeallowanceforminoraccessorystructures. Inaddition,anamendmentisproposedtoaddresssetbackforsuchstructures,notingthat althoughthezoningsetbackis6’feet(20’forcornerlots),allstructuresarealsorequired tomeetbuildingcoderequirements.Thisamendmentisintendedtoaddresssituations whereadetachedaccessorystructuremaymeetthezoningsetback,butmayhaveaneave oroverhangwhichencroachesintothesetback.Whilethatconditionisallowableby zoningordinance,thebuildingitselfmayberequiredtomeetspecificfirecode requirementsintermsofconstructionmethods. CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 2 PLANNINGCOMMISSIONREVIEWANDRECOMMENDATION ThePlanningCommissionreviewedthisitemduringtheirregularmeetingonJune2nd, 2015.ThePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingontheproposedamendment.No publictestimonywasofferedontheitem.ThePlanningCommissionvotedunanimously torecommendtheproposedamendment. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS ThePlanningCommissionunanimouslyrecommendsalternative1below. 1.MotiontoadoptOrdinanceNo.616approvingAmendmentstotheMonticello ZoningOrdinance,Chapter5,Section3–AccessoryUseStandardsandChapter8, Section4–Definitions,asrelatedtoregulationsforAccessoryBuilding-Majorand AccessoryBuilding–Minor,basedonafindingbasedonafindingthattheordinance amendmentsasproposedcontinuetosupporttheComprehensivePlan,serveto clarifyexistingordinanceregulations,andsupportconsistencywithadoptedbuilding codes. 2.Motionofother. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION Staffsupportstheproposedamendments,astheywillprovideneededclarityand consistencyintheapplicationoftheordinanceinrelationshiptothebuildingcodefor accessoryusestructures. D.SUPPORTINGDATA A.OrdinanceNo.616 B.Chapter5,Section3–GeneralStandardsandLimitationsforAccessoryUsesand StructuresandUseTable,Table5-1,UsesbyDistrict,excerpt C.Chapter8,Section4–Definitions,excerpt D.MinnesotaStateBuildingCode,excerpt ORDINANCE NO. 616 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE FOR THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS: CHAPTER 5, SECTION 1 – USE TABLE (TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT) CHAPTER 8, SECTION 4 – DEFINITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 5.3(B) – General Standards and Limitations for Accessory Uses and Structures, Title 10 – Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows: (3) Location of Accessory Uses or Structures Except for fences and walls, the following standards shall apply to all accessory structures: (a) All accessory structures, except as may be specifically denoted, shall be located at least six (6) feet from all lot lines, and at least the minimum distance from public rights-of-way as denoted in the individual zoning district regulations. All such structures must meet applicable building codes related to fire separation distance. (i) A side yard setback of twenty (20) feet shall be maintained from property lines abutting public streets. Section 2. Section 5.3(C) – Table of Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures (Table 5-4 Accessory Uses by District), Title 10 – Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows: TABLE 5-4: ACCESSORY USES BY DISTRICT Use Types “P” = Permitted “C” = Conditionally Permitted “I” = Interim Permitted Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements A O R A R 1 R 2 T N R 3 R 4 M H B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 C C D I B C I 1 I 2 Accessory Dwelling Unit P P P P P 5.3(D)(1) Accessory Building – minor (≤ 120 square feet) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(2) Accessory Building – major (> 120 square feet) P P P P P P P C P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(3) Section 3. Section 8.4 – Definitions, Title 10 – Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 616 ACCESSORY BUILDING -- MAJOR: A building which is accessory to a principal structure and is required to be constructed with a building permit per MN Rule 1300.0120exceeds 120 square feet in size. ACCESSORY BUILDING -- MINOR: A building which is accessory to a principal structure and exempt from a building permit per MN Rule 1300.0120is equal to or less than 120 square feet in size. Section 11. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations and diagrams that result from such amendments, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 12. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 8th day of June, 2015. CITY OF MONTICELLO __________________________________ Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (B) General Standards and Limitations for Accessory Uses and Structures City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 361 (B) General Standards and Limitations for Accessory Uses and Structures (1) Compliance with Ordinance Requirements All accessory uses and accessory structures shall conform to all applicable requirements of this Ordinance. The provisions of this Section establish additional standards and restrictions for particular accessory uses and structures. (2) General Standards All accessory uses and accessory structures shall meet the following standards: (a) Directly serve the principal use or structure; (b) Be customarily accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to the principal use and structure; (c) Be subordinate in area, extent, and purpose to the principal use or structure; (d) Be owned or operated by the same person as the principal use or structure; (e) Be located on the same lot as the principal use or structure; (f) Not be constructed or established prior to the time the principal use or structure is constructed or established; (g) Together with the principal use or structure, not violate any standards of this Ordinance; (h) Not be located within platted or recorded easements or over underground public utilities; (i) An accessory building shall be considered an integral part of the principal building if it is connected to the principal building either directly or by an enclosed passageway. Such accessory buildings shall adhere to requirements for the principal building. (j) If a principal building is proposed to be removed with no immediate replacement, all accessory structures shall also be removed. (k) Not constitute a combination use, which is the combination of two principal uses (combination uses will not meet the above standards in terms of being subordinate or providing service to the principal use). CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (B) General Standards and Limitations for Accessory Uses and Structures Page 362 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (3) Location of Accessory Uses or Structures Except for fences and walls, the following standards shall apply to all accessory structures: (a) All accessory structures, except as may be specifically denoted, shall be located at least six (6) feet from all lot lines, and at least the minimum distance from public rights-of-way as denoted in the individual zoning district regulations. (i) A side yard setback of twenty (20) feet shall be maintained from property lines abutting public streets. (b) Detached accessory buildings shall be six (6) feet or more from any other building or structure on the same lot. (c) Accessory structures shall not be located beyond the front building line established by the principal structure. (4) Maximum Height (a) Detached accessory buildings shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height except in the I-1 and I-2 districts. (b) No accessory structure shall exceed the height of the principal structure unless specifically allowed by this ordinance. (5) Maximum Number of Accessory Structures In all residential zoning districts, the following limitations on accessory structures shall apply: (a) No more than one (1) private, detached major accessory building may be erected for each dwelling; (b) No more than one (1) private, detached minor accessory building may be erected for each dwelling; (c) Additional major or minor accessory buildings may be erected if approved via a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 2.4(D). Section 2.4(D): Conditional Use Permits CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 363 (C) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses (1) Listed Accessory Uses Table 5-4, lists the allowed types of accessory uses and structures within each zoning district. If a specific accessory use is allowed in a district, the column underneath the district is marked with a "P." If a specific accessory use is conditionally permitted in a district, the column underneath the district is marked with a "C." If the accessory use or structure is not allowed in a district, the column is shaded. If there is a reference contained in the column entitled "Additional Requirements", refer to the cited section(s) for additional standards that apply to the specific accessory use. (2) Interpretation of Unidentified Accessory Uses (a) The Community Development Department shall evaluate applications for accessory uses that are not identified in Table 5-4 on a case-by-case basis using the following standards: (i) The definition of “accessory use” (see Section 8.4 – Definitions) and the general accessory use standards and limitations established in Section 5.3(B); (ii) The additional regulations for specific accessory uses established in Section 5.3(D), Specific Standards for Certain Accessory uses; (iii) The purpose and intent of the base and overlay districts in which the accessory use or structure is located; (iv) Any potential adverse impacts the accessory use or structure may have on other lands in the area as compared to other accessory uses permitted in the district; and (v) The compatibility of the accessory use or structure, including the structure in which it is housed (if applicable), with other principal and accessory uses permitted in the district. (b) The decision of the Community Development Department to permit or deny an unlisted use or structure is final, but may be appealed pursuant to Section 2.4(H). Section 8.4: Definition of “accessory” Section 8.4: Definition of “use” Section 5.3(B): General Standards and Limitations for Accessory Uses and Structures Section 5.3(D): Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses Section 2.4(H): Appeal of Administrative Decisions CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses Page 364 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (3) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures TABLE 5-4: ACCESSORY USES BY DISTRICT Use Types “P” = Permitted “C” = Conditionally Permitted “I” = Interim Permitted Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements A O R A R 1 R 2 T N R 3 R 4 M H B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 C C D I B C I 1 I 2 Accessory Dwelling Unit P P P P P 5.3(D)(1) Accessory Building – minor (≤ 120 square feet) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(2) Accessory Building – major (> 120 square feet) P P P P P P P C P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(3) Adult Use – accessory C 5.3(D)(4) Agricultural Buildings P 5.3(D)(5) Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(6) Automobile Repair – Major C 5.3(D)(7) Automobile Repair – Minor C 5.3(D)(8) Boarder(s) P P P 5.3(D)(9) Co-located Wireless Telecommunications Antennae C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 4.13(E) Commercial Canopies P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(10) Commercial Transmission/ Reception Antennae/ Structures C C C C C C 4.13(D) Donation Drop-off Containers P P 5.3(D)(11) Drive-Through Services P P P C P P P 5.3(D)(12) Entertainment/Recreation – Outdoor Commercial C C C C 5.3(D)(13) Fences or Walls P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.3 Greenhouse/Conservatory (non-commercial) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(14) Heliports C C C C C 5.3(D)(15) Home Occupations P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(16) Indoor Food / Convenience Sales P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(17) Indoor Storage P P P P P P 5.3(D)(18) Incidental Light Manufacturing P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(19) Machinery/Trucking Repair & Sales C 5.3(D)(20) Office P P P P P P none Off-street Loading Space P P C P P P P P P P 4.9 CHAPTER 8: RULES & DEFINITIONS Section 8.4 Definitions Subsection (B) Lots City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 421 8.4 Definitions The following words and terms, wherever they occur in this ordinance, shall be interpreted as herein defined: ACCESSORY: A use, activity, structure, or part of a structure that is subordinate and incidental to the main activity or structure on the site. ACCESSORY BUILDING -- MAJOR: A building which is accessory to a principal structure and exceeds 120 square feet in size. ACCESSORY BUILDING -- MINOR: A building which is accessory to a principal structure and is equal to or less than 120 square feet in size. ADULT USES: Adult uses include adult bookstores, adult motion picture theatres, adult mini-motion picture theatres, adult massage parlors, adult steamroom/bathhouse/sauna facilities, adult companionship establishments, adult rap/conversation parlors, adult health/sport clubs, adult cabarets, adult novelty businesses, adult motion picture arcades, adult modeling studios, adult hotels/motels, adult body painting studios, and other premises, enterprises, establishments, businesses, or places open to some or all members of the public, at or in which there is an emphasis on the presentation, display, depiction, or description of "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas" which are capable of being seen by members of the public. Activities classified as obscene as defined by Minnesota Statute 5617.241 are not included. Specified Anatomical Areas: (A) Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic region, buttock, anus, or female breast(s) below a point immediately above the top of the areola; and (B) Human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered. Specified Sexual Activities: (A) Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, oral copulation, anal intercourse, oral-anal copulation, bestiality, direct physical stimulation of unclothed genitals, flagellation or torture in the context of a sexual relationship, or the use of excretory functions in the context of sexual relationship, and any of the following sexually-oriented acts or conduct: anilingus, buggery, coprophagy, coprophilia, cunnilingus, fellatio, necrophilia, pederasty, pedophilia, piquerism, sapphism, zooerasty. (B) Clearly depicted human genitals in the state of sexual stimulation, arousal, or tumescence. CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 1 2L.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-048approvinganapplicationfora GamblingPremisesPermittoconductgamblingattheMonticelloCountryClub. Applicant:MonticelloYouthHockeyProgram (CS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheMonticelloYouthHockeyProgramsubmittedaPremisesPermitApplicationto conductgamblingattheMonticelloCountryClubat1209GolfCourseRoad.Councilis askedtoadopttheresolutionsotheapplicationcanbesubmittedtotheStateforapproval. TonyLarson,MYHPGamblingManager,hascompletedthebackgroundcheckformand turnedinfinancialpaperworkasrequiredbycitycodeforlawfulgambling.Monticello YouthHockeyProgramisawareofthegamblingregulationsandthecity’stradeareaand reportingrequirements. TheStateGamblingControlBoardrequiresCounciltoadoptaresolutionapproving gamblingpremisespermitapplications.CitystaffdoesnotfindanyreasonthatCouncil wouldnotapprovethisapplication.Mr.Larsonhasbeenaskedtobepresentatthe meetingifCouncilwouldhaveanyquestions. A1.BudgetImpact:NA A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:NA B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2015-048approvinganapplicationforaGambling PremisesPermitattheMonticelloCountryClub,locatedat1209GolfCourse Road,fortheMonticelloYouthHockeyProgram,contingentuponsuccessful completionofthecity’sbackgroundcheckandsubmissionofallnecessary paperwork. 2.Motiontodenytheresolutionatthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2015-048 CopyofGamblingPremisesPermitapplication CopyofCityCoderelatedtoLawfulGamblingRegulations FinancialreportsfromMonticelloYouthHockeyProgram https://mwhco.sharefile.com/d-s8dd7600c1b14d4bb CopyofleaseforuseofspaceatMonticelloCountryClub(tobeprovided) CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-048 APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR A PREMISES PERMIT TO CONDUCT LAWFUL GAMBLING AT THE MONTICELLO COUNTRY CLUB WHEREAS, Monticello Youth Hockey Program Inc. has submitted an application to the City Council of Monticello for a Premises Permit to conduct lawful gambling activities at the Monticello Country Club located at 1209 Golf Course Road in Monticello, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Council is not opposed to a gambling permit being issued by the State Gambling Control Board; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that the application by the Monticello Youth Hockey Program Inc. for a Premises Permit to conduct lawful gambling activities at the Monticello Country Club is hereby approved, contingent on the following: 1. Successful completion of City background check. 2. Submission of all necessary paperwork, such as financial reports and lease. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 8th day of June, 2015. CITY OF MONTICELLO ________________________ Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Kerry Burri, Interim City Clerk CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution #2015-048 duly passed, adopted and approved by the Monticello City Council at their scheduled meeting on June 8, 2015, and recorded in minutes of said meeting. ____________________________________ Kerry Burri, Interim City Clerk Notary Public: _______________________________ Date: ___________________________ (STAMP) Organization Description 2011 Organization Description 2012 Organization Description 2013 Organization Description 2014 JANUARY - Silver Creek Township 500.00 Brent Stromme Video Camera for Boy's High School 469.42 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 20.00 Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 11,565.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 480.00 Woodbury Hockey Club Tournament Cancelled (900.00) Christian Social Service Meat Donation 540.00 FEBRUARY MN Revenue Unsold Ticket Refund (34,983.57) Gambling Control Board License Permit for the Station 150.00 Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 21,000.00 Woodbury Area Hockey Club Bantam AA Tournament Registration 900.00 MN Revenue Unsold Ticket Refund (29,625.27) Christian Social Services Meat Donation 40.00 Monticello Women of Today 300.00 MN Revenue Unsold Ticket Refund (25,210.97) Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 16,000.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 20.00 MARCH Christian Social Services Meat Donation 180.00 Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 20,430.00 Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 17,622.31 Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 17,000.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 260.00 Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 13,551.25 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 20.00 APRIL Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 17,499.40 Christian Social Services Meat Donations 220.00 City of Monticello 10,000.00 Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 12,928.99 Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 12,326.79 Christian Social Services Meat Donations 80.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 80.00 MAY - Christian Social Services Meat Donation 220.00 Silver Creek Township Playground Maintenance 3,000.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 80.00 Eric & Kristen Moen 2013 Exempt Raffle Donation 6,242.67 JUNE Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 14,043.75 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 40.00 Eden Prairie Hockey Association Bantam AA Tournament Registration 850.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 60.00 Monticello Youth Hockey Program 6,000.00 Mounds View Youth Hockey Bantam B1 Registration 1,150.00 Rogers Youth Hockey Tournament Registration 675.00 Bloomington Youth Hockey Squirt A Squirtacular 995.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 40.00 Anoka Area Hockey Bantam A & B Tournament Registration 1,350.00 JULY - Christian Social Services Meat Donation 260.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 260.00 AUGUST - Nate Johnson Benefit Bucket Raffle Proceeds Donated 3,650.00 Osseo/Maple Grove Youth Hockey Registration 1,225.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 200.00 Anoka Area Hockey Tournament Registration 625.00 Woodbury Area Hockey Club Bantam AA Tournament Registration 900.00 Spring Lake Park Youth Hockey Tournament Registration 600.00 Armstrong Cooper Youth Hockey Squirt C Tournament Registration 750.00 New Ulm/Sleepy Eye Youth Hockey Tournament Registration 1,000.00 St. Cloud Youth Hockey Peewee A Tournament Registration 1,100.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 520.00 Breezy Point Tournaments Bantam B & Power A Tournament Registration 1,590.00 SEPTEMBER AST Sports Youth Hockey Jerseys 2,100.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 200.00 Fargo Youth Hockey Squirt A Tournament Registration 975.00 Daves Sports Jerseys 8,000.00 Fargo Youth Hockey Squirt B Tournament 975.00 Mounds View Youth Hockey Peewee A Tournament 750.00 Dave Sports Bantam Jerseys 5,548.00 Fargo Youth Hockey Squirt B Tournament 995.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 80.00 Fargo Youth Hockey Squirt A Tournament 995.00 New Ulm/Sleepy Eye Youth Hockey Tournament Cancelled (1,000.00) OMGHA Peewee B Tournament 1,295.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 340.00 OMGHA Squirt A Tournament 1,225.00 OCTOBER - Christian Social Services Meat Donation 1,000.00 Rogers Youth Hockey Tournament Registration 1,000.00 AAHA Tournament Registration 1,025.00 NOVEMBER Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 7,740.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 320.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 120.00 Daves Sports Jerseys 10,180.00 DECEMBER Gambling Control Board 2012 Licensing Fee 1,050.00 Gambling Control Board 2013 Licensing Fee 1,050.00 Gambling Control Board 2014 Licensing Fee 1,050.00 Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 7,220.00 Christian Social Service Meat Donation 780.00 Moose Sherrit Ice Arena Youth Ice Time 12,000.00 State of Minnesota 2015 Annual Licensing Renewal 900.00 Christian Social Services Meat Donation 440.00 MN Gambling Control Board Gambling Manager's License Renewal 100.00 TOTAL:8,409.58 28,959.73 81,079.47 80,893.99 By Donation Category:2011 2012 2013 2014 Totals: Youth Ice Time:39,283.15 43,995.00 64,500.35 53,148.99 200,927.49 Tournament Registration:2,100.00 13,760.00 7,285.00 23,145.00 Meat Donation:960.00 3,240.00 1,720.00 980.00 6,900.00 Raffle Donation:3,650.00 6,242.67 - 9,892.67 Jerseys:5,548.00 18,180.00 23,728.00 Licensing:1,050.00 1,200.00 1,050.00 1,000.00 4,300.00 Other:6,500.00 13,469.42 300.00 20,269.42 Unsold Ticket Refund:(34,983.57) (29,625.27) (25,210.97) - (89,819.81) Total:8,409.58 28,959.73 81,079.47 80,893.99 199,342.77 MONTICELLO YOUTH HOCKEY PROGRAM LAWFUL PURPOSE EXPENDITURES RECAP FOR YEARS 2011, 2012, 2013, AND 2014 CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 1 2M.Considerationofauthorizing50/50costsharewiththeCityofWindomfor purchasingbandwidthforfinalimplementationof10GigRing(JO/RL) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheCityCouncilisaskedtoconsiderthefinalimplementationofthe10gigringby authorizinga50/50costshareplanbetweenFiberNetandtheCityofWindomfor bandwidthonthering.Theconceptforthe10gigringwasinitiatedbyBrianEstremand DanOlsenin2014;constructionisnearingcompletionandFiberNetwillsoonbeableto utilizethebandwidthonthering.Thetotalcostofthebandwidthis$12,000permonth. UnderthecostsharingagreementwithWindom,FiberNetwouldberesponsiblefor $6,000permonth. AccesstothiscircuitwillenableFiberNettosatisfygrowingbandwidthdemand,provide capacitytooffer1gigservice,andenableuserstogaintheoptimumexperienceofthe proposedGigaCenterdevice.Also,the10gigringprovidesaredundantcircuitenabling servicetocontinueiftheringisinterruptedorcut.SinceWindomandMonticellowillbe onthesamecircuit,thereisincreasedpotentialforcostsavingsassociatedwithsharing equipmentandapplications. Byworkingtogether,MonticelloandWindombenefitfromthebulkpurchaseof bandwidth.Aswithmanypurchasedgoods,buyingbandwidthinsmallerincrementsis morecostly.Thusitmakessenseforthetwosystemstopurchasebandwidthtogetherata lowerrate.Underthisarrangement,EnventiswillbechargingMonticello50%ofthecost andWindom50%.Althoughactualusageineachcommunitywilllikelyvarysomewhat fromdaytoday,itisrecommendedthattheplanbesimplifiedbyhavingeach communitypayaflat50%.However,thebandwidthusagewillbemonitoredsothat adjustmentscanbemadeintheeventonecommunityusessignificantlymorebandwidth thantheother. ThetimingoftheadditionalbandwidthisbeneficialbecauseFiberNetisexperiencing increaseddemandassociatedwithnewsubscribersaswellaspeakusagetimes.The systemiscurrentlyexceedingcapacityduringthesepeaktimes.Withoutincreasing capacity,duringperiodsofhighusage,customerspeedtestswillnotalignwithadvertised speeds.FiberNethasalreadyreceivedsomecomplaintsinthatregardandwecertainlydo notwanttoestablishareputationfornotdeliveringonadvertisedspeeds. AttachedisaspreadsheetthatshowsthecostforbandwidthpaidbyFiberNet.Pleasewill notethattheXOcontractcostishighincomparisontotheEnventiscircuit;XOcosts $7,100for1giguntilAugustof2016whereasthenewringwillhavemorebandwidthat acostof$6,000.Also,currently,additionalbandwidthisprovidedbyVaultusatacost of$4,400.TheVaultuscontractismonthtomonth,soFiberNetwoulddropthisservice whentheEnventiscircuitisestablished. Basedonthesechanges,thecostforbandwidthduringtheremainingperiodoftheXO agreementwouldincreaseby$1,600permonththroughAugust2016;however,the bandwidthcapacitywouldalsogreatlyincrease.InAugust2016,theXOcontractwould bediscontinueddroppingcostsby$7,100.ItshouldalsobenotedthatEnventisis CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 2 providingafreemonthofserviceduetothelengthoftimeithastakenforthemtomake thecircuitavailable. A1.BudgetImpact:Therewillbeanincreaseof$1,600inthemonthlycostof bandwidthduringtheremainderoftheagreementwithXO.Oncethecontract withXOiscomplete,themonthlycostwilldropto$6,000permonth.The increaseinbandwidthcapacitywouldbeginassoonasFiberNetbeginsusingthe 10gigring. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Thereshouldnotbeanimpacttostaffworkloads. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoauthorize50/50costshare($6,000/monthpercity)withtheCityof Windom,Minnesotaforpurchasingbandwidthtocompletefinalimplementation of10GigRingarrangement 2.MotiontodenythecostsharingarrangementwiththeCityofWindom,Minnesota forpurchasingbandwidth C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: TheFiberNetAdvisoryBoardandstaffrecommendAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Tableshowingabriefhistoryandprojectedcostofbandwidth Nov 2014 Dec 2014 Jan 2015 Notes:The Vaultas invoice would also be reduced under the yondoo video Monthly Pmt.$4,749.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 option- it would be reduced by $150.00 per month. Aug 2013 Dec 2013 Oct 2014 May 2015 Notes:The price for XO was reduced once during an agreement renegotiation and then reduced again Circuit 1 Pmt.$9,327.47 $4,991.26 $5,004.87 $5,230.12 when FiberNet began utilizing MICE in 2014. Incremental increases are due to increased Circuit 2 Pmt.$7,596.22 $1,819.44 $2,256.59 $1,918.42 bandwidth usage. Vendor Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 Dec 2015 Jan 2016 Feb 2016 Mar 2016 Apr 2016 May 2016 Jun 2016 Jul 2016 Aug 2016 XO (Comb.) (1 Gig)$7,148.00 $7,148.00 $7,148.00 $7,148.00 $7,148.00 $7,148.00 $7,148.00 $7,148.00 $7,148.00 $7,148.00 $7,148.00 $7,148.00 $7,148.00 $0.00 $0.00 Vaultas $4,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Windom (10 Gig)$0.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Total $11,548.00 $13,148.00 $13,148.00 $13,148.00 $13,148.00 $13,148.00 $13,148.00 $13,148.00 $13,148.00 $13,148.00 $13,148.00 $13,148.00 $13,148.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,600.00 $19,200.00 However, this includes significantly increased internet capacity to offset increased internet traffic with the expectation that costs will decrease significantly after the completion of the XO agreement in 2016. XO Price/M = $7.00 Additional Per Month: Additional for the Year: For Final Year of the XO Agreement: Windom Price/M = $1.20 $1,600.00 -$7,148.00 Vaultas History -$349.00 XO History CityCouncilAgenda:06/08/2015 1 2N.Considerationofauthorizingsendingaletterofinteresttoparticipateincooperative costsavingventureswiththeCityofWindomrelatedtotelephoneswitching equipment(JO) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: CityCouncilisaskedtoconsidersendingtheCityofWindomaletterofinterestin supportofexploringopportunitiestosharecostsorpurchaseservicesfromWindom relatingtotheoperationoftelephoneswitchingequipment.MonticelloandWindom bothoperateMetaswitchequipmentandeachpartypayscostsforupgradesand maintenanceseparately.Withthisletterofinterest,MonticellowouldsupportWindom’s effortstoexploreopportunitiestojoinforcestodrivedowncostsforbothentities.This letterisnotacommitmentbutasignalthatreviewingthispotentialisworthinvestigating. Thelevelofsavingsisstilltobedetermined;however,itisclearthatsignificantsavings couldbeaccruedbysharingequipmentandknowledge.Forinstance,oneofthelargest annualexpendituresisamaintenancecontracttotaling$30,000thatsupportsoperationof theMetaswitch.Theopportunitytocutthisexpenseinhalfisveryinviting.Also, equipmenteventuallyreachesendoflifeandneedstobeupgraded.Currently,Monticello isoperatingaSessionBorderControllerthatneedstobeupdatedsoon.Thecostofthis upgradewillbeincludedinthe2016budgetandwillbeasignificantcostitem.Thisis anotherexpensethatcouldbemitigatedthroughcostsharingorpurchaseofservicefrom Windom. A1.BudgetImpact:Nobudgetimpact A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Minoramountsofstafftimewillbeneededtodraftand sendtheletterofinterest. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoauthorizesendingaletterofinteresttoparticipateincooperativecost savingventureswiththeCityofWindomrelatedtotelephoneswitching equipment 2.Motiontodenyauthorizationofsendingaletterofinterest C.FIBERNETADVISORYBOARD/STAFFRECOMMENDATION: TheFiberNetAdvisoryBoardrecommendsAlternative#1.Thisinitiativeisinkeeping withoureffortstoreducecostsforeachcommunitythroughsharingequipmentand redundantservices,thusdroppingoverallcostsforeachentity.Thepresenceofthe10gig ringprovidesadirecthighspeedconnectionthatenablesaswitchtoresideinWindom andoperateasthoughitwereintheMonticelloheadendfacility. D.SUPPORTINGDATA:None CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 1 4A.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-049acceptingbidsandawarding contractfortheSchoolBoulevard/FallonAvenueand85th StreetImprovements, CityProjectNo.14C003 (SB) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: OnApril13,2015,theCityCouncilapprovedfinalplansandspecificationsand authorizedtheadvertisementofbidsforimprovementsSchoolBoulevard/FallonAvenue and85thStreetimprovementproject,whichincludesstreetandpathwayimprovements. Theprojectwasbidasfollows: BaseBid: •SchoolBoulevard:Includes2-inchfullwidthmillandoverlayfromFenningAvenue toEdmonsonAvenue.Includesdrivewaywideningforthehighschoolexit.Includes boulevardtreeplantinginselectareastoavoidtransmissionline,signsandstreetlight constraints. •SchoolBoulevardPathways:Includespathwayreconstructionalongthenorthsideof SchoolBoulevardfromEdmonsonAvenuetoFallonAvenue.Includespathway reconstructionalongthesouthsideofSchoolBoulevardfromFallonAvenueto CardinalHillsPark.Arootbarrierwillbeinstalledtomitigatetheimpactofexisting treerootsthathavedamagedthepathway. •FallonAvenue/85th Street:IncludesabituminousoverlayalongFallonAvenueand85th StreetadjacenttotheHuntersCrossingDevelopmentandincludesculvertreplacement. Alsoincludesacombinationofa bituminousoverlayandreclamationandpaving along 85thStreetbetweenTH25andEdmonsonAvenuewithintheCitylimits. •FallonAvenuepathwayextension:Includesextendingapathwayalongthewestsideof FallonAvenuefrom87th AvenuetoFarmsteadAvenue. Awetlanddelineationhasbeencompletedandtheprocessforpermittingforwetland mitigationisinprocess.TheCitywillneedtopurchasewetlandcreditsforthe mitigation.Afutureagendaitemwilladdressthis.Thisprocessshouldnotdelay constructionofthepathway. AlternateBids-PioneerParkPathway(FarmsteadDrivetoFallonAvenue): •Alternate1:Includesreconstructionofthe920-footpathwaytoa10-footwidth. •Alternate2:Includesabituminousoverlayofthe920-footpathwaytotheexisting8- footwidth.Includessubgradecorrectioninselectareas. CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 2 Bothalternativesincludeinstallinga40-footwideconcretesectionofthepathwaywhere vehiclescrossthepathwayatthecurbcutfromSchoolBoulevardduringevents.A concretesection,asopposedtoathickerbituminoussection,willprovidetheadded strengthtoaccommodatetruckloadingsandwilldelineatetheareawherevehiclesand truckscancross. BidsfortheprojectwerereceivedandopenedonThursday,May28,2015.TheCity received2bids,withKnifeRiverCorporationsubmittingthelowbidforthisprojectas determinedbytheBaseBidplusAlternative1or2.Thefollowingtablesummarizesthe bidresults. Contractor TotalBaseBid (SchoolBlvd/85th/Fallon) TotalAlt.1 (Reconstruct PioneerPark Path) TotalAlt.2 (Overlay PioneerPark Path) TotalBaseBid + Alt.1 TotalBaseBid + Alt.2 KnifeRiverCorp $863,559.10 $32,246.00$28,816.00$895,805.10$892,375.10 Hardrives,Inc.$899,735.86 $34,095.44 $24,079.05$933,831.30$923,814.91 Engineer’s Estimate $969,764.00 $38,440.00 $34,445.00$1,008,204.00$1,004,209.00 Asummaryandamoredetailedbreakdownofallthecontractorsbidforeachalternate bidisenclosed. ItisrecommendedtoawardtheAlternate1bidforthePioneerParkpathwayatthistime basedonthefollowingreasons:conditionofthepathway,needforimprovement comparedtootherpathwayneeds(seeenclosedpathwayconditionsmap),competitive bidprice,minimalbidpricedifferencebetweenAlternate1and2resultinginincreased pavementlifeandvaluewithAlternate1,completepathwayimprovementsinthisareaof theCityatthistimeratherthanalaterdatetominimizedisruptiontothearea. ConstructiononSchoolBoulevardwilloccurforaperiodbetweenJuly13andAugust 21,2015afterRiverfestandwhenschoolisnotinsession.ConstructiononFallon Avenueand85th StreetistobecompletedbyAugust28,2015. A1.BudgetImpact:Theestimatedprojectcostforconstructingtheimprovements withtheBaseBidplusAlternate1is$1,100,000.Thisincludes22%forindirect costs.Fundingsourcesfortheproposedimprovementsincludespecial assessmentstotheschooldistrict,MunicipalStateAid,andafuturebondissueto financetheproject. Theestimatedassessmenttotheschooldistrictis$200,000whichincludestheir frontageshareoftheSchoolBoulevardimprovementsandthecomplete constructionofthehighschooldrivewayexpansion. TheStateAideligibleamountfortheSchoolBoulevardimprovementsis approximately$680,000.TheCityhaspassedareimbursementresolutionforthis CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/15 3 project.Abondissueisplannedforlaterintheyear.Proceedsfromtheissuewill beusedtorecoverreimbursablecosts. Approximately$40,000wasincludedinthegeneralfundforpathway maintenancethatcouldbeusedtofundthePioneerParkpathwayimprovements. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Constructioninspectionoftheprojectwillbe completedbyacombinationofCitystaff(ifanewhireisonboardandtrainedby theprojectstartdate)andWSB.WSBwillbecompletingtheconstruction stakingandconstructionadministrationservices. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2015-049acceptingthebidsandawardingthe contracttothelowestresponsiblebidder,KnifeRiver,Corp.intheamountof $895,805.10fortheBaseBid-SchoolBoulevard/FallonAvenueand85th Street ImprovementsplusAlternate1(reconstructPioneerParkpathway)CityProject No.14C003 2.MotiontoadoptResolution#2015-049acceptingthebidsandawardingthe contracttothelowestresponsiblebidder,KnifeRiver,Corp.intheamountof $892,375.10fortheBaseBid-SchoolBoulevard/FallonAvenueand85th Street ImprovementsplusAlternate2(overlayPioneerParkpathway)CityProjectNo. 14C003 3.MotiontoadoptResolution#2015-049acceptingthebidsandawardingthe contracttothelowestresponsiblebidder,KnifeRiver,Corp.intheamountof $863,559.10fortheBaseBid-SchoolBoulevard/FallonAvenueand85th Street ImprovementsCityProjectNo.14C003 C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2015-049 LetterofRecommendation BidSummary&Tabulation PathwayConditionsMap CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-049 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE SCHOOL BOULEVARD/FALLON AVENUE AND 85TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 14C003 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the project which included a base bid and two alternate bids. The base bid consisting of street, pathway and other necessary appurtenant work to segments of School Boulevard, 85th Street and Fallon Avenue. The alternate bids consisting of: (1) reconstruction of Pioneer Park pathway, and (2) mill and overlay with subgrade correction of Pioneer Park pathway. Bids were received, opened, and tabulated, and the following bids were found to comply with the advertisement for bids: Contractor Total Base Bid (School Blvd/85th/Fallon) Total Alt. 1 (Reconstruct Pioneer Park Path) Total Alt. 2 (Overlay Pioneer Park Path) Total Base Bid + Alt. 1 Total Base Bid + Alt. 2 Knife River Corp $863,559.10 $32,246.00 $28,816.00 $895,805.10 $892,375.10 Hardrives, Inc. $899,735.86 $34,095.44 $24,079.05 $933,831.30 $923,814.91 Engineer’s Estimate $969,764.00 $38,440.00 $34,445.00 $1,008,204.00 $1,004,209.00 WHEREAS, the bid of Knife River Corporation of Sauk Rapids, MN in the amount of $895,805.10 for the total base bid plus alternate bid 1 for the construction of said improvements, in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and advertisement for bids, is the lowest responsible bidder and shall be and hereby is accepted. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for the construction of said improvements for and on behalf of the City of Monticello. 2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been executed. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-049 ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 8th day of June, 2015. CITY OF MONTICELLO ____________________________________ ATTEST: Brian Stumpf, Mayor _______________________________ Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator engineering planning environmental construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\01494-960\Admin\Construction Admin\1494-96&97 CST LTR RECMMDTN-hmcc-060215.docx June 2, 2015 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: School Boulevard/Fallon Avenue and 85th Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 14C003 S.A.P. 222-105-002 WSB Projects No. 1494-96 and 1494-97 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Bids were received for the above-referenced project on Thursday, May 28, 2015, and were opened and read aloud. Two bids were received. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy and tabulated. It should be noted that the project was bid with a Base Bid and two alternates, Pioneer Park Pathway Reconstruct (Alternate 1) and Pioneer Park Pathway Overlay (Alternate 2). The recommended basis of award is the Pioneer Trail Reconstruct (Base Bid plus Alternate 1). Please find enclosed the bid tabulation indicating the low bidder as Knife River Corporation – North Central, Sauk Rapids, Minnesota, with a total bid in the amount of $895,805.10 (Base Bid plus Alternate 1). The Engineer’s Estimate for the project was $1,008,204.00. We recommend that the City Council consider these bids and award a contract for the Base Bid plus Alternate 1 in the amount of $895,805.10 to Knife River Corporation – North Central based on the results of the bids received. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE Project Manager Enclosures cc: Jeff O’Neill, City of Monticello Eric Eckman, WSB & Associates, Inc. Honorable Mayor and City Council June 2, 2015 Page 2 K:\01494-960\Admin\Construction Admin\1494-96&97 CST LTR RECMMDTN-hmcc-060215.docx Mark Magnuson, Knife River Corporation srb !"b$ !"b$ State Highway 25 S River F orest D r N e C o u n t y R o a d 3 9 N e F e n n i n g A v e N e G o l f C o u r s e R d Matthew Cir Alpine Dr Willow St 8 7 t h S t N e Linn St C o u n t y Roa d 39 N e 6 1 /2 S t Chestnut St 8 3r d S t N e G o l d e n E agle L n 99th S t N e Gold e n P on d L nP e l i c a n L n B i s o n Ave S t o n e r i d g e Dr Elk A v e F o x S t ParkPlac e D r Mou n t C urveB l v d Spirit Hills Rd Gate w a t e r D r Oakridg e D r 89thStNe Eas t w o odLn N e Vine St C o u n try A v e Coun t r y L n Otter c r e ek R d M a r v i n E l w o o d R d OrchardCir Gateway C i r T r o y M a r q u e t t e D r R e dford L n Fi e l d c r e stCir 8 6 t h S t N e WashingtonSt E i d e r L n B akken S t 9 3 r d S t Ne Oak Ln G o o drich D r J a s o n Ave Ne Orc h a rdCi r E ChelseaRdW 4thStE M e a d o w O a k A v e N e O r i o l e L n Minnesota St 8 7 t h S t N e F a r m s t e a d D r D e e r S t R i v e r R i d g e L n N e O a k l e a f C t P r a iri e R d Harvest Ct Mill Tr ai l Ln N e D i a m o n d D r 3rd St E P a r k D r Prescott Dr Summ i t C t B a d g e r S t Walnut St Hart Blvd 7 t h S t W Apple Ln MinnesotaSt Sandberg R d 5thStW Cedar St Meado w O a k D r E Broadway St River St E W Broadway St Vine St 3rd St W Walnut St S Linn St Front St River St W 4th St W 5th St W Locust St S c h o o l B l v d C h e l s e a R d Palm St Hennepin St Elm St Ramsey St Wright St Maple St New St Palm St Elm St Du n d a s C i r 6th St W LocustSt Overlook Ln D u n d a s R d Brentwood Dr I n n s b r o o k D r GinghamCt 7 t h S t E T e rritorial R d G i l l a r d A v e N e V ineLn OakviewCt CraigLn KennethLn T r oy Marquette L n S a v a n n a h A v e B e a r A v e C o b b l e s t o n eCt SomersetLn Oakwood Dr E M e a d o w OakLn N e 8 5 t h S t N e P e b b l e b r o o k D r EbersoleA v e S t a r l i n g D r K amp a Cir B r i a r O a k e s B lvd Elm St G o odrichDrNe PrairiePineCt M a l l a r d L n G r a y s t o n e A v e 9 0 t h S t N e E a g l e C t H o m e s t e ad Dr Oak Ri d g e C i r Dalton W ay 97th St Ne Je r r y L i e f e r t D r OrchardLn St o nerid g e L n Oakwood Dr G arveyCt Kevin Longley Dr Ri v e r v i e w D r N e 85th S t N e S u mm i t P o i nteR d M e a d o w L n N e D a r lin gto n A v e N e Giff o r t A v e N e CedarSt D alton Ct G iff o r t C t E i s e l e A v e N e DaltonAve N e H il l to p D r Private Dr Fa i r w a y D r 8 4 t h St Ne Pine St State Highway 25 Ne E a s t w oodC i r N e Red O ak Ln N e Ha y w a r d C t S MarvinElwoodRd H ay w a r d Ct N Sandy Ln M o c k i n g b i r d LnFallonDr 8 8 t h St N e C r o c usLn E a g l e R i d g e Ln E d m o n s o n A v e N e PrairieCreekLn R e d R ock L n Farmstead Ave D a lt o n A v e N e River St W River Mill Dr N e R i v er S t W 8 7 t h S t N e Cl u b V i e w D r Woo d s i d e D r O a k v i e w L n Da v e rn A v e Ne Darrow Ave Ne Hig hland Way 9 4 t h S t Ne Wi l d w ood W ay H art Blvd Oa k r i d g e D r N W es ton Dr M a r t i n D r Fairhill L n M a r v i n R d HedmanLn Spru c e D r Fallo n A v e N e T h o m a s P a r k D r E a s t O a k D r F a l c o n A v e DeeganAve Hillcr e s t R d Gilbert Ave N e 9 5 t h S t N e WbI94ToPineStP ine S t T o Eb I94 D alton A v e N e I n t e r s t a t e 9 4 110 th St Ne EbI94ToFenning A v e Ne Eak e r nCi r Ne Fenning A v eNe T o WbI94 E Broadway St P i n e S t T o E b I 9 4 C h a m b e r l a i n A v e N e EbI94ToPineSt Mill R u n Rd Mississippi Dr Ne P i n e S t T o W b I94 F e n ning Ave Ne To E b I 9 4 ChelseaRd W b I 94 ToFenning Ave N e 8 5 t h S t N e Interstate 94 MISSISSIPPI RIVER SE39P SE54P NW06P S E 4 0 P S E 3 1 P NE05P NW05 SE12P SE09P SW10P SW15P N E 0 2 P S W 0 8 P SE37P SE06P SW08P N E 1 3 P S E 4 4 P S E 3 3 P NW07P S E 2 2 P NW08P SE 4 5 P NE 11P NE10P SE36P NW09 SW07P SW14P S E 3 2 P SE2 1 P NW03P NE01P S E 4 2 P NW04P SE15P NW06P S E 4 8 P SE07P SE43P S E 5 6 P S E 4 3 P SE26P SE25P S W 0 5 P NE07P SE55P SE16P SE29P S E 1 3 P SE09P NE01P NE06P SE47P S E2 8 P SE11P SE51P SW03P S E 5 3 P SE01P SE12P SE17P S E 2 0 P S E0 5 P S W 08P S E1 4 P SE10P SE49P SE03P S W 0 4 P SE4 1 P NW02P SW13P SE27P S E 3 8 P SE02P S W 1 1 P NE01P NE 12P SE50P NE 13P SW01P NE14P SW 1 4 P NE02P SE34P SW12P S E 3 5 P SE04P SE30P SW06P SE08P SE18P NE09P SE46P SW 02P NE08P SW10P NE04P SE24P NW01P City ofMONTICELLO2013 Pathway Conditions Map ! 0 1,200 2,400 Feet Legend NO RATING Pathway Inspection Rating 0 - 4: POOR 5 - 7: FAIR 8 - 10: GOOD J:\gis\city\MONT\Maps\Pathway Map.mxd Date: 4/9/2015 CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 1 4B.ConsiderationofapprovingtheinitialpurchaseanddeploymentofCalix GigaCentersforFiberNetMonticelloresidentialcustomers(JO/RL) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: CityCouncilisaskedtoconsiderapprovingtheinitialpurchaseandimplementation strategyofCalixGigaCentersservingFiberNetMonticelloresidentialcustomers. Currently,FiberNetrequires3piecesofequipmenttoprovideresidentialservice:An ONT,acyberpower,andarouter(forinternetcustomers).Asacost-savingmeasure FiberNetre-usesequipmentfromdisconnectedsubscribersatnewproperties;however, thecurrentstockofONTsisdepletedandtheolderequipmentneedstobereplacedover time.FiberNetwillneedtopurchasenewONTsin2015. StaffhasexaminedtheoptionsforpurchasingnewONTsandrecommendspurchasinga newCalixproductcalledaGigaCenter.FiberNetalreadyusesCalixONTs,but GigaCentersarelessexpensive,requirefewerpiecesofindividualequipment,and provideanenhancedexperienceforsubscribers.Inaddition,staffhaspreparedalong- termstrategyforrecoveringthecostoftheGigaCenters,somethingthathasnot previouslybeenusedforONTpurchases. Initially,theGigaCentersarelessexpensivetopurchase.CurrentlyFiberNetpays approximately$488.00totalfortheONT,cyberpower,androuter.Ifthecustomer provideshisorherownrouter,thetotalis$398.00.Incontrastthecostforthe GigaCenteris$320.00andnoadditionalequipmentisneeded.TheGigaCentershave greatlyimprovedwirelesscapabilityintermsofrangeandspeedwithouttheneedforan additionalrouter.ThismeansneitherFiberNetnorthesubscriberneedstosupplyoneand FiberNetwillbeabletotroubleshootmoreefficientlywithfewerpiecesofequipment, particularly3rd partyequipment. GigaCentersalsoofferanenhancedexperienceforsubscribersaswellasbenefitsto FiberNet’sstaffandbudget. ForSubscribers •Muchstrongerwirelesssignalthroughoutthewholehouseandproperty •Capacitytosupportmoredevicesatpeakperformance •Capabilityforhighersymmetricalspeeds(uptoagigonwireless)Current limitis100mbps. •EnablesFNMabilitytoprovide1gigspeeds. ForFiberNet •TakesadvantageofthenewE7platform •Moreefficienttroubleshooting •Fewertruckrollsmeansmoneysavedontechsupport •Lesswiringduringinstallsmeanstimeandmaterialsmoneysaved •Potentialtoaddfeatureslikewirelessset-topboxes •DeploymentoftheGigaCenterplaystoFiberNet’sstrength:Internetservice. Theenhancedcustomerexperienceandcapacityforhighendperformance makesitthepremierinternetserviceinMonticello. CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 2 Basedonthelowercost,needforlessequipment,andenhancedcustomerexperience, staffrequeststoimplementtheuseofGigaCentersinMonticellousingthefollowing strategy: a)FundstopurchasetobederivedfromcapitalequipmentportionoftheFiberNet budgetunderacostrecoveryprogram. b)AllnewsubscribersareinstalledwithaGigaCenter(approximately20-25per month). •AllnewsubscribershaveaGigaCenterGatewayfeeof$15.99ontheir account.Thishelpscoverthecostoftheequipmentandalsoentitlesthe customertofreeservicecallsontheFiberNetequipment. •AllnewsubscriberssignaninstallationformagreeingtopayanEarly TerminationFeeiftheycancelservicewithin2years.ThecostoftheETFis 15.99xnumberofmonthsremaininginthe2yearterm.Thisisjustafee-itis notaresidentialcontract. c)ExistingsubscriberswouldreceiveaGigaCenteruponrequest. •IftheyoptfortheGigaCenterforabetterexperience,theywouldagreetothe sametermsasnewsubscribers:theGigaCenterGatewayFeeandtheEarly TerminationFee.Or,thecustomercouldpurchasetheGigaCenterout-right for$320. d)ExistingsubscriberswithONTsthatfailwouldhaveachoice. •TheycouldhavetheiroldONTreplacedwithausedONTfornoadditional cost. •TheycouldhaveanewGigaCenterinstalledwiththesamefeesasanew subscriber. Basedonthisplan,fundsfromthebudgetwouldbeusedforaninitialcapitalexpenditure onthenewequipment.However,thecostoftheGigaCenterswouldberecoveredwithin 2yearswiththegatewayfeeorthroughtheearlyterminationfee.After2years,the gatewayfeebecomesrevenue.Mostimportantly,FiberNet’sinternetsubscribersget accesstohighqualityequipmentwithagreatuserexperience. FormoreinformationontheGigaCenteranditsperformance,visittheCalixwebsite. Oncethere,checkoutthevideolibraryforafirsthanddescriptionofperformanceina residentialsetting.Thisvideodemonstratesthecompactsize,rangeandpowerofthe GigaCenterinaresidentialsetting.http://www.calix.com/gigacenter/ Currently,therearesomecustomersthatneedtobuyathirdpartyrouterinordertoboost signalstothefarreachesoftheirproperty.TheGigaCenterrangeandpowerwill eliminatetheneedforacustomertospendmoneyonanddeployathirdpartyrouter. A1.BudgetImpact:Staffrequeststouseapproximately$8,750ofthe2015budgeted capitalexpensestopayforthefirst25GigaCenters.Staffrecommendsinstituting twonewsubscriberfeestooffsetthecostofpurchasingtheequipment.Thefirst isaGigaCenterGatewayFeewhichissimilartothecurrentrouterrentalfeeand thesecondisanearlyterminationfee.Thiswillensurethecostoftheequipment CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 3 isrecoveredwithin2years.Insomerespects,CapitalFundsarebeingusedtoset uparevolvingfundthatshouldreplenishitselfovertime. Pleasenote,iftheuseofGigaCentersissuccessful,FiberNetwillneedto continuetopurchaseenoughequipmenttocovernewinstalls.Aswiththecurrent system,FiberNetwouldrecycleanydisconnectedGigaCentersatnewresidences. However,enoughequipmentisneedtocovertheprojected25newinstallsper month.TheGigaCenterswouldbepurchasedonanas-neededbasisasstaff,the FiberNetAdvisoryBoard,andCityCouncilmonitorhowthecontinuedpurchase ofequipmentimpactsthe2015budgetandincludethecostofGigaCentersinthe 2016budget.Useofthisequipmentwillhaveashort-termeffectonthebudget sincethefundstocovertheinitialcostsarerecoveredovera2yearperiod.The totalfundsneededforpurchaseofGigaCentersin2015willbedependenton demand. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Therewillbeaninitialshort-termincreasein workloads,particularlyforinstallationtechnicians,asstafflearnstoimplement thenewequipment.Overtime,theGigaCentersshouldmakestaffmoreefficient withfewpiecesofequipmenttoinstallandimprovedtroubleshooting capabilities. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapprovetheinitialpurchaseandimplementationstrategyofCalix GigaCentersforFiberNetMonticello. 2.MotiontoapprovetheinitialpurchaseandimplementationstrategyoftheCalix GigaCenterswithchangesasdirectedbytheCityCouncil: 3.Motiontodenyapprovaloftheinitialpurchaseandimplementationstrategyof CalixGigaCentersforFiberNetMonticello. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: DavidRusselfromCalixprovidedinformationontheGigaCentertotheFiberAdvisory BoardandtheFiberAdvisoryBoarddiscussedoptionsfordeployingthedevice.The FiberAdvisoryBoardvotedunanimouslytorecommenddeploymentoftheGigaCenter asnotedunderAlternative#1basedonthelowercost,needforlessequipment,and enhancedcustomerexperience.Staffconcurswiththisrecommendation. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: http://www.calix.com/gigacenter/ FiberNetAdvisoryBoardHandout Calix GigaCenters Currently, FiberNet requires several pieces of equipment to provide residential service: A. ONT B. Cyber Power C. Router (internet customers) As a cost-saving measure FiberNet re-uses equipment from disconnected subscribers at new properties; however, the current stock of ONTs is depleted and the older equipment is beginning to fail. FiberNet will need to purchase new ONTs in 2015. Staff has examined the options for purchasing new ONTs and recommends purchasing a new Calix product called a GigaCenter. FiberNet already uses Calix ONTs, but GigaCenters are less expensive, require fewer pieces of equipment, and provide an enhanced experience for subscribers. In addition, staff has prepared a long-term strategy for recovering the cost of the GigaCenters, something that has not previously been used for ONT purchases. Cost ONT $350.00 GigaCenter $320.00 Cyber Power $48.00 Router $90.00 Total $488.00 Total $320.00 GigaCenters cost less than traditional ONTs. Staff requests to use money budgeted for capital expenses in 2015 to pay for the GigaCenters. These funds would be used to purchase ONTs regardless of whether the new or old model of ONT is approved. Staff also recommends instituting two new subscriber fees. The first is a GigaCenter Gateway Fee which is similar to the current router rental fee and the second is an early termination fee; both would offset the cost of purchasing the equipment. Equipment The GigaCenters are more efficient because they combine previously separate pieces of equipment into a single item. This is less expensive for FiberNet to provide and requires that customers have fewer pieces of equipment in their homes. Also, since GigaCenters are installed inside the homes, this equipment is not exposed to the weather conditions like traditional ONTs. This should help extend the life of the equipment. Features GigaCenters offer an enhanced experience for subscribers as well as benefits to FiberNet’s staff and budget. For Residential Subscribers  Stronger wireless signal throughout the whole house  Capability for more devices at peak performance  Capability for higher symmetrical speeds (up to a gig on wireless) For FiberNet  Takes advantage of the new E7 platform  More efficient troubleshooting  Fewer truck rolls means money saved on tech support  Less wiring during installs means time and materials money saved  Potential to add features like wireless set-top boxes Deployment Based on the lower cost, need for less equipment, and enhanced customer experience, the FiberNet Advisory Board is asked to consider recommending the following GigaCenter deployment plan to the Monticello City Council. 1. Funds are allocated from the capital equipment portion of the FiberNet budget to purchase GigaCenters. 2. All new subscribers are installed with a GigaCenter (approximately 20-25 per month). a. All new subscribers have a GigaCenter Gateway fee of $15.99 on their account. This helps cover the cost of the equipment and also entitles the customer to free service calls on the FiberNet equipment. b. All new subscribers sign an installation form agreeing to pay an Early Termination Fee if they cancel service within 2 years. The cost of the ETF is 15.99 x number of months remaining in the 2 year term. This is just a fee- it is not a residential contract. 3. Existing subscribers would receive a GigaCenter if they request it. a. They could retain their current equipment with no change to their bills. b. If they opt for the GigaCenter for a better experience, they would agree to the same terms as new subscribers: the GigaCenter Gateway Fee and the Early Termination Fee. 4. Existing subscribers with ONTs that fail would have a choice. a. They could have their old ONT replaced with a used ONT for no additional cost. b. They could have a new GigaCenter installed with the same fees as a new subscriber. Based on this plan, money from the budget would be used for an initial capital expenditure on the new equipment. However, the cost of the GigaCenters would be recovered within 2 years with the gateway fee or through the early termination fee. After 2 years, the gateway fee becomes revenue. Please note, if the use of GigaCenters is successful, FiberNet will need to continue to purchase enough equipment to cover new installs. As with the current system, FiberNet would recycle any disconnected GigaCenters at new residences. However, staff and the advisory board will need to continue to monitor how the continued purchase of equipment impacts the 2015 budget and include the cost of GigaCenters in the 2016 budget. Use of this equipment will have a short-term effect on the budget since the funds to cover the initial costs are recovered over a 2 year period. CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 1 4C.ConsiderationofapprovingtheconceptofFiberNetMonticellocontractingwith Yondooforhostedvideoservices(RL/BR/JO) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: CityCouncilisaskedtoconsiderapprovingtheconceptofFiberNetMonticello contractingwithYondooforhostedvideoservices.IfsodirectedbytheCityCouncil, staffwillnegotiateafinalagreementwithYondoothatwouldbebroughtforwardtoCity Councilforapprovalatalaterdate. FiberNet’sfeasibilityreportproposedatripleplayproviderofferingtelephone,internet, andvideoservices.Atthattime,thebestoptionforvideoservicewasatraditional businessmodel;FiberNetpurchasestheequipmenttoprovidetheservice,independently holdsprogrammingagreementswiththenetworks,upgradesandmaintainsitsown equipment,andcoversthecostswithrevenuefromtheservice. However,overtimeFiberNet’srelianceonthismodelhasbecomeanobstacletoits financialindependence.Videoisbyfarthemostexpensivetripleplayservicetoprovide, requiresfrequentupgradestoequipmenttoremainviable,andismostaffectedbythe competitiveenvironmentofMonticello.Inaddition,therearerecurringfixedcosts associatedwithdeliveringvideothatfortheforeseeablefuturesurpasstherevenue potentialforthesysteminthishighlycompetitivemarket. Atthesametimehowever,theavailabilityofvideo(tripleplay)remainsanimportant serviceformanycustomersandakeyfacetofthesystemfromamarketability standpoint.Infact,accordingtoFNMstaff,akeyfactoraffectingsubscriberratesisthe costandqualityofthevideoservice. Itisnolongerfeasibletocontinueoperatingatthestatusquo.ThusFiberNetneedsto findawaytocontinueprovidingtripleplayserviceswhiledecreasingthelossonvideo. Thereisarelativelyrecent,less-traditionalmodelusingathirdpartyhostedprovider calledYondoothatcouldofferFiberNetawaytoretainahighqualityvideoservicefor subscribers,thusallowingFiberNettoshedsignificantfixedcosts.Theirwebsitecanbe viewedat:http://www.yondoo.tv/ YondooisasubsidiaryofCSIDigital,acurrentvideovendorforFiberNet.Theelements oftheYondoobusinessmodelhaveexistedasseparatepartsformanyyears,butthey recentlyintegratedthemintoacompletehostedvideomodel.InthismodelFiberNet connectstoYondoo’ssuperheadendbyanexistingfiberfeed.FiberNetcontinuesto install,bill,andprovidetechsupportforvideosubscribers;however,Yondoois responsibleforthecontent,hardware,licensing,andsoftware.Theyspreadthosecosts outamongtheirvariousclientnetworkswhichallowsFiberNettocontinueofferingthe serviceoveritsnetworkatasignificantlyreducedcost.EachmonthYondoowouldbill FiberNetforthenumberofsubscribersandtheirvideopackages.Inreturnforaccessto thenetwork,YondoowouldalsopayFiberNet$3.00persubscriberinthetop2service packages($23,000/yearatcurrentcustomercount). ThereareseveralessentialoutcomesofanagreementwithYondoothatwouldhavea positiveimpactonFiberNet.Mostsignificantly,theagreementwithYondoowould reducethecostofprovidingvideoservice.ByutilizingYondoo,currentcostsforvideo CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 2 wouldbeeliminated.FiberNetwouldnolongerberesponsibleformonthlyprogramming costs,softwareandsupport,orequipmentupgradesandmaintenance.Insteaditwouldbe billedmonthlybyYondoopersubscriber,andthesemonthlyfeeswouldbecoveredby thesubscribers’monthlypaymentsforvideoservice.Thishasthepotentialtoeliminate themonthlylossfromprovidingvideo.Inaddition,FiberNetwouldseeareductionin budgetaryitemsliketheenergybill.ByusingtheYondooheadend,FiberNetcould removeequipmentfromtheheadendinMonticellowhichreducesenergyconsumption. Thereisalsothepossibilityforareturnontheresaleoftheremovedequipment. EnteringtheagreementwithYondoowouldalsoenhancethevideoserviceofferedto FiberNetsubscribers.Currently,thegreatestobstaclestogainingandretainingvideo subscribersareagingequipmentandalackoffeatures.Yondooiscompatiblewith FiberNet’scurrentequipment,buttheywillalsoprovideupdatedset-topboxesandDVRs whichallowFiberNetsubscriberstohaveanupdateduserinterface,extendedtimelinefor thechannelguide,andadditionalDVRstorage.Theupdatedequipmentwillberolledout tocurrentsubscribersovertimeandgiventoallnewsubscribersatinstall.Inadditionto theequipment,Yondooprovidesthefeaturesmostfrequentlyrequestedbysubscribers includingVideoonDemand,TVEverywhere,andWholeHomeDVR.These enhancementswillmakeFiberNetmorecompetitiveinthemarketwithouthavingto expendagreatdealofcapitaltoupdateitsexistingequipment.Lastly,theproposed introductionoftheGigaCenteralongwithYondooenablesthepotentialofextending Yondoototelevisionsinthehomewirelesslythusreducinginstallationtimeand improvingflexibilityforcustomertomoveoraddtelevisionswithinthehome. Finally,theagreementwithYondoowouldreduceFiberNet’srelianceonahighnumber ofsubscriberstocoverthenetwork,equipment,andmaintenancecosts.Thepastfive yearshaveshownthatwithoutconsistent,considerablereinvestmentinthesystem,the necessarynumberofsubscriberstofundvideoisnotplausible.UsingYondooreduces FiberNet’sindividualrelianceonthenumberofsubscriberstomakevideoprofitable. FiberNetpaysforthesubscriberswehave;Yondoointurntakestheresponsibilityfor highsubscribercountsandspreadsthemoutamongseveralclientnetworks. TheinitialtermfortheagreementwithYondooisaminimumof3years;thisisin responsetoprogrammingrightswhichoperatein3yearcycles.However,Yondoois willingtonegotiatethetermsofthecapitalstartupcostsestimatedat$65,000ifFiberNet agreestoa5yearterm.Iftheconceptforhostedvideoserviceisapprovedbythecity council,staffwillnegotiatewithYondooandbringthefinalizedagreementbacktothe councilforapproval. Itisalsoimportanttonotethattherearepotentialchallengestotheagreementwith Yondoo.InordertocoverthecostsofitsmonthlypaymenttoYondoo,FiberNetmust ensurecustomersarebilledatYondoo’sprices.Thismeanshigherpackagepricesand lowerequipmentcosts;somesubscriberbillswilldecreaseandsomewillincrease dependingonthespecificelementsofthesubscriber’sbill.Thisalsomeansmostexisting promotionsanddiscountswillbeeliminatedinfavorofYondoo’spricingstructure.It willbechallengingtoamendallsubscribers’billstoaccurateYondoopricing,butitis theonlywayFiberNetwillensurerevenuetocoveritsowncoststoYondoo.Finally, FiberNetwillneedtoimplementanyfuturechangestoYondoo’spricing.Iftheirrates increasein2016,FiberNetwouldfollowwithanincreasetovideosubscribers. CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 3 Duetothechangesincustomerbills,thereisthepotentialforashort-termlossofvideo subscribers.Staffanticipatesarecoveryofsubscriberratesovertimeduetothepremier productoffering,butthereisnowaytoguaranteethat.Thiscouldmakeitchallengingto reachthe1,000videosubscriberthresholdwithinthefirst18months.Itshouldbenoted thatthequalityoftheproductwillenableFNMtocompeteforservicetoapartments whichincreasesthelikelihoodofachievingthe1,000threshold.Lastly,thepresenceof enhancedvideoofferingisanothertoolfortheBusinessManagerinmarketingFiberNet services. Lastly,sincethecurrentequipmentprovidingvideoservicetodayisdatedandneeding replacementsoon,andbecausethecostofreplacingtheequipmentissohigh,itisnot likelythatFNMwillgobacktoprovidingvideoserviceonanindependentbasisiffor somereasontheYondooprogramdoesnotworkout. Overall,theYondoohostedvideooptionallowsFiberNettosignificantlyreducethecosts ofprovidingvideowhileenhancingtheserviceofferedtotheMonticellocommunity.The transitionwouldbeachallenge,andtherewouldlikelybeaninitialdeclineinvideo subscribers,butthereisastronglikelihoodthehostedoptionwouldmakeFiberNet strongeroverthelong-term. A1.BudgetImpact:SwitchingtoYondoowillresultinareductionofapproximately $102,554inreoccurringnetworkfeesassociatedwithdeliveringvideocontent underthecurrentplatform.SeeattachedFiberAdvisoryBoardhandoutfordetail. Thereisthepotentialforapproximately$65,000incapitalstartupcosts,but Yondoohasexpressedwillingnesstonegotiatethosecosts.Duringagreement negotiationsFiberNetcouldagreetoattempttoreach1,000subscribersinthefirst 18monthsinordertohavethefeeswaivedordeferthepaymentuntilafterthe first18monthswhenthecostcouldbebudgeted.Yondoohasalsoexpressed willingnessinanoptiontoletFiberNetwaivetheIRUpaymentof$3.00per customerinthetop2packagesuntilthesystemreaches1,000videosubscribersin Monticello. Inaddition,thereisapossibleshorttermcostofapproximately$2,000to integrateelementsofYondoowithFiberNet’sbillingsystem,SourceOne Solutions. Howevertherearepotentiallypositivelong-termbudgetimpacts.Withthe Yondooagreementthecurrentcostsforvideoareeliminated.Yondoowillassist FiberNetwithexitingcurrentagreementswithproviders,andtheonlyremaining costwillbetheYondoofeeforeachvideosubscriber.Thosefeeswillbecovered bytherevenuefromthesubscribers.ThiswillreduceFiberNet’sannualbudget shortfall. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Therewillbeatemporarystaffworkloadincrease duringthetransitionwithsupportfromYondoostaff.Oncethesystemisinplace, itisanticipatedthatworkloadswillreturntonormalwithonlyaslightlong-term increaseofworkintheofficeforrecordkeepingandbillingaccuracy. CityCouncilAgenda:6/08/2015 4 B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapprovetheconceptofFiberNetMonticellocontractingwithYondoo forhostedvideoservices 2.MotiontodenyapprovaloftheconceptofFiberNetMonticellocontractingwith Yondooforhostedvideoservices C.FIBERNETADVISORYBOARD/STAFFRECOMMENDATION: TheFiberNetAdvisoryBoardandstaffsupportAlternative#1.Althoughvideoservice demandisdiminishingnationwideandinternetserviceisincreasingasameansfor obtainingvideocontent,videoserviceremainsanimportantelementofamarketable serviceinMonticello.UtilizingservicewithYondoowillenableFiberNettogreatly enhanceitsvideoofferingwithoutacapitalinvestmentandatthesametimegreatly reduceexistingoverheadassociatedwithprovidingvideoservice.Thecosttothe subscribersmayincreaseslightlyundertheYondooplatform,butwiththatincrease comesimportantpremiumfeatures. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: FiberNetAdvisoryBoardHandoutsfrom6/3/2015specialmeeting YondooExecutiveSummary YondooChannelLine-Up FiberNet Monticello and Potential Agreement with Yondoo I. FiberNet Monticello Video Currently video is an obstacle to FiberNet’s financial independence because: a. It’s expensive to provide b. It requires frequent upgrades to equipment c. It requires significant staff time for operations and maintenance d. The local market is competitive e. It is undergoing shifts as consumers weigh the benefits of opting out of traditional television options in favor of streaming options. Because of these factors, FiberNet is facing diminishing subscriber numbers and escalating costs. In recent years revenues have not been enough to cover the cost of providing the service to the Monticello community. Monthly Annually Total Revenue $56,341.39 $676,096.68 Total Costs $60,995.33 $731,943.96 Total Loss -$4,653.94 -$55,847.28 It is no longer feasible to continue operating at the status quo. FiberNet’s budget cannot support the upgrades necessary to match the competition, but it would risk losing subscribers if video service were eliminated. However, there is a relatively recent, less-traditional model; a third party hosted provider called Yondoo that could offer FiberNet a way to retain video service for subscribers. II. Yondoo Video Services Yondoo is a subsidiary of CSI Digital, a current video vendor for FiberNet. The business model behind Yondoo has existed as various parts for many years, but they recently pulled everything together into a new hosted video model. In the hosted video option FiberNet connects to Yondoo’s super-headend by an existing fiber feed. FiberNet continues to install, bill, and provide tech support for FiberNet video subscribers; however, Yondoo is responsible for the content, hardware, licensing, and software. This allows FiberNet to continue offering the service at a significantly reduced cost. Yondoo FiberNet Equipment & Software Installations Maintenance Billing Programming Contracts Tech Support III. Impact on FiberNet There are several essential outcomes of a Yondoo agreement that would positively impact FiberNet. a. Reduced Costs: By utilizing the Yondoo hosted model many current costs for video would be eliminated, most would be eliminated immediately. For example, instead of paying CSI Digital each month for software and support, trouble tickets, etc., FiberNet would be billed per Yondoo subscriber. This cost would be covered by the subscribers’ monthly payments for video service. In addition to these costs, FiberNet would see a reduction in budgetary items like the energy bill. By using the Yondoo headend, FiberNet could remove equipment from the headend in Monticello which reduces energy consumption. There is also possibility for resale value of the sold equipment. MONTHLY NETWORK FEES Vendor Monthly Annually Notes Vubiquity $779.50 $9,354.00 PPV and VOD- out of service still in contract Vaultus $150.00 $1,800.00 Cross connect fees CSI Digital $2,700.00 $32,400.00 Fiber feed from Portland CSI Digital $2,500.00 $30,000.00 Software and Support CSI Digital $250.00 $3,000.00 Trouble Tickets (cost varies per month) Minerva $2,166.67 $26,000.00 Software and Support Total Network Costs $8,546.17 $102,554.00 Eliminated under Yondoo MONTHLY PROGRAMMING FEES (Based on billing information from May 2015) (Costs vary depending on the number of subscribers) Vendor Monthly Annually Notes Local Broadcast Channels $6,345.33 $76,143.96 NTTC $33,809.91 $405,718.92 Majority of the channels NBCU $4,596.97 $55,163.64 Approximately 20 channels Direct Pay Channels $6,194.07 $74,328.84 Includes Fox Sports FOX Retail $87.50 $1,050.00 Premium Channels $554.00 $6,648.00 Except Starz & Encore Bulk Premium $513.05 $6,156.60 Hotels Music Choice Digital Music $348.33 $4,179.96 Total Programming Costs $52,449.16 $629,389.92 Eliminated under Yondoo b. Enhanced Video Service: The greatest obstacles to gaining and retaining video subscribers is the lack of features and aging equipment. However, these complaints are addressed by the features offered by Yondoo. In addition, the pricing for Yondoo features and equipment matches current market rates. FiberNet’s is several years old which makes the sale of certain services, such as HD, more difficult in a competitive market. c. Updated Pricing Model: One of the most significant legacies of the past is the existence of promotional pricing on video subscriber accounts. It would very difficult to correct or update these promotional prices individually, but transitioning to Yondoo would update each bill and ensure that FiberNet is covering its costs. d. Economy of Scale FiberNet’s current video system is reliant on a high number of subscribers to cover the network, equipment, and maintenance costs. The past five years have shown that without consistent, considerable reinvestment in the system, this number of subscribers is not plausible. Using Yondoo reduces FiberNet’s individual reliance on the number of subscribers to make video profitable. FiberNet pays for the subscribers we have; Yondoo in turn takes the responsibility for high subscriber counts and spreads them out among several client networks. IV. Yondoo Agreement The specific elements of the Yondoo agreement include: a. A minimum term of 3 years (necessary for programming rights which operate in 3 year cycles). With the 3 year term capital startup costs apply immediately. b. Option for a 5 year term. Under the 5 year term FiberNet has 2 options to waive capital startup costs: 1. FiberNet would have 18 months to achieve 1,000 video subscribers. If that number is met, the fees are waived. If not, the startup costs would be due. SERVICE UPGRADES FiberNet Yondoo Notes Set-Top Boxes X X Updated version with Yondoo DVR X X Updated version with Yondoo Whole Home DVR X X HD X X TV Everywhere X Video on Demand X Pay Per View X Premium Channels X X 2. FiberNet could opt to waive the monthly IRU payment ($3 per subscriber) until 1,000 video subscribers are achieved. At that point the IRU payment would be reinstated. c. Within the agreement FiberNet agrees to provide Yondoo with access to the network. In return, Yondoo would provide FiberNet with an IRU payment of $3.00 per subscriber. d. FiberNet will continue to bill customers directly for their video service. Yondoo will submit a monthly bill to FiberNet based on the number of subscribers and their video packages. e. FiberNet will continue to collect and distribute Cable PEG fees as established in the franchise agreement. V. Challenges The long-term effect of an agreement with Yondoo has the potential to have a significant positive impact on FiberNet subscribers and the budget. However, there are challenges that should be acknowledged. a. In order to cover the costs of its monthly payment to Yondoo, FiberNet must ensure customers are billed at Yondoo’s prices. This means higher package prices and lower equipment costs; some subscriber bills will decrease and some will increase depending on the specific elements of the subscriber’s bill. This also means most existing promotions and discounts will be eliminated in favor of Yondoo’s pricing structure. It will be challenging to ensure all subscribers’ bills have accurate Yondoo pricing, but it is the only way FiberNet will ensure revenue to cover its own costs to Yondoo. b. Due to the changes in customer bills, there is the potential for a short-term loss of video subscribers. Staff anticipates a recovery of subscriber rates over time due to the improved product offering, but there is no way to guarantee that. VI. Summary The Yondoo hosted video option allows FiberNet to significantly reduce the costs of providing video while enhancing the service offered to the Monticello community. The transition would be a challenge, and there would likely be an initial decline in video subscribers, but there is a strong likelihood the hosted option would make FiberNet stronger over the long-term. VII. FiberNet Advisory Board Options a. Recommend signing the Yondoo agreement for hosted video services with the terms as presented in the original document. FiberNet would need to reach 1,000 video subscribers within the first 18 months to have the set-up costs waived or would have to budget for those costs in the 2016 budget. b. Recommend signing the Yondoo agreement for hosted video services with the option to waive the monthly IRU payment to cover the start-up costs. Once FiberNet reaches 1,000 video subscribers then the monthly IRU payment would be reinstated. c. Recommend rejecting the agreement with Yondoo for hosted video services. 20015 SW Pacific Hwy -Suite 100 -Sherwood, OR 97140 503.715.2525 1 3/26/15 Executive Overview Client/Grantor:Fibernet Monticello A high level overview of how CSI views the video world on both a technical and financial illustration can be explained by two models. Model 1, which is the traditional operator model, is much like the current Headend located at most smaller regional providers. In this model each independent operator has their own equipment which provides the content to their customers. Each independent operator is required to procure equipment, keep their own equipment up to date, provide service, and cover the costs to run the system. For smaller operators, this can become overwhelming due to the inability to spread out the capital costs over large amount of subscribers. Model 2, which is the hosted model. In this model, we have basically acquired all the separate components in which individual operators would implement for their own networks, and implemented them in a cloud environment. This environment and package has been named Yondoo.This model basically provides you, the network Grantor, the capability to provid e your Internet customers a top of the line video service without breaking both your return on investment and our mutual customers’bank accounts.The service Model 2 provides you the third “check” in the box for your offering, thereby stopping and then hopefully reversing the loss of customers to other triple play providers. Business Case Overview We purchase content, hardware, licensing,and software at a discounted wholesale level via long term strategic agreements we have setup with multiple prime vendors. We spread that Capital Expenditure cost over not just our estimated 800 mutual customers, but over all our Yondoo customers. This truly allows us to be able to provide customer’s top of the line video options at no cost to you. Additionally after careful review of your market area and subscriber counts we are ready to extend you the option to go with our Yondoo product for zero startup costs.The only requirement to this waiving of the installation fees is a commitment of 1,000 users within 18 months of the go live.Fibernet currently has 800 video customers. Business Process Overview We provide a data service to Fibernets 11th Avenue South Minneapolis MN handoff location, which Fibernet carries to its customer’s premise, at which point we pick it bac k up inside their location with our Set top boxes. We will work with you on a mutually agreeable process to complete installations, trouble calls, and other ongoing operational requirements. We implement state of the art process tracking and interface tools directly from our management and billing system to yours! We will tailor a process that both your staff and customers find easy to utilize and satisfying. We document the process so it is easily trainable and have included some information in the following pages to illustrate this process. Technical Overview CSI Digital provides all carrier grade handoff services within its Portland Datacenter location.Additionally we also have enabled POPs around the country and will work to find the most economical connection for your organization. In this case, we will hand off services in your 11th Avenue location.CSI recommends 2.5GBs of traffic to be set aside for Video. Once the video traffic is in your operations center, we will inject any local content, then hand it back off to your network engineers for distribution into customers’ locations. Think of yondoo as your video solution bundled together and delivered on one single piece of fiber optic cable. That is how we yondoo! How will your customers yondoo? The next steps are to execute the attached documents, at which time we will contact you to establish a roll out timeline. Page 1 of 5 DRAFT (1c) Channel Lineup At-‐A-‐Glance yon d o o 5 0 f o r $ 5 0 Sta r t e r Ba s i c Exp a n d e d Top 50 Popular Networks SD HD 50.00$ 29.90$ 74.90$ 99.90$ STB included STB included STB included Top 10 Popular Broadcast Channel Channel 1 ABC -‐ KATU 2 702 √√√√ 2 CBS -‐ KOIN 6 706 √√√√ 3 FOX -‐ KPTV 12 712 √√√√ 4 NBC -‐ KGW 8 708 √√√√ 5 PBS -‐ KOPB 10 710 √√√√ 6 CW -‐ KRCW 3 703 √√√√ 7 ION -‐ KPXG 5 705 √√√√ 8 MeTV -‐ KATU 4 √√√√ 9 MyTV -‐ KPDX 13 713 √√√√√√√ 10 This TV -‐ KRCW 7 √√√√ 11 Univision -‐ KUNP 16 716 √√√√ Top 40 Popular Pay TV Channel Channel 1 A&E Network 95 795 √√√ 2 ABC Family 113 813 √√√ 3 AMC 158 858 √√√ 4 Animal Planet 102 802 √√√ 5 BBC America 128 828 √√√ 6 Bravo 86 786 √√√ 7 Cartoon Network 54 √√√ 8 CNBC 53 753 √√√ 9 CNN 46 746 √√√ 10 CNN Headline News 47 747 √√√ 11 C-‐Span 24 √√√√ 12 C-‐Span 2 25 √√√√ 13 Discovery Channel 101 801 √√√ 14 Disney 60 760 √√√ 15 E! Entertainment 84 784 √√√ 16 ESPN 30 730 √√√ 17 ESPN2 34 734 √√√ 18 Food Network 81 781 √√√ 19 Fox News Channel 49 749 √√√ 20 FX 114 814 √√√ 21 Golf Channel 37 737 √√√ 22 Hallmark Channel 94 √√√ 23 HGTV 80 780 √√√ 24 History Channel 96 796 √√√ 25 Lifetime Television 77 777 √√√ 26 MLB √√ 27 MSNBC 52 752 √√√ 28 NBA TV 63 763 √√ 29 NBC Sports 38 738 √√√ 30 NFL Network √√ 31 NHL Network √√ 32 Oxygen 83 783 √√√ 33 SyFy 123 823 √√√ 34 TBS 120 820 √√√ 35 TLC 103 803 √√√ 36 TNT 121 821 √√√ 37 Travel Channel 92 792 √√√ 38 TruTV 59 √√√√ 39 USA Network 125 825 √√√ 40 WE TV 76 776 √√√ Page 2 of 5 DRAFT (1c) Channel Lineup At-‐A-‐Glance yon d o o 5 0 f o r $ 5 0 Sta r t e r Ba s i c Exp a n d e d Other Popular PAY TV 1 American Heroes √ 2 AWE √ 3 BBC World 58 √ 4 Bloomberg 51 √ 5 Boomerang 68 √ 6 Chiller 130 √ 7 Cloo 131 √ 8 CNBC World 53 753 √ 9 Cooking Channel 90 790 √ 10 Crime & Investigation 129 829 √ 11 C-‐Span 3 26 √√√ 12 Destination America 110 810 √ 13 Discovery Family 64 764 √√ 14 Discovery Life 108 √ 15 Disney Jr 62 √√√ 16 Disney XD 61 761 √√ 18 DIY 89 789 √ 19 ESPN Classic 31 √√ 20 ESPN U 33 733 √√ 21 ESPNEWS 32 732 √√ 22 Esquire 85 785 √√ 24 EWTN 21 √√√ 25 Fox Business Channel 50 750 √√ 26 Fox College Sports -‐ Atlantic 43 √ 27 Fox College Sports -‐ Central 44 √ 28 Fox College Sports -‐ Pacific 45 √ 29 Fox Movie Channel 850 √ 30 Fox Sports 1 36 736 √√ 31 Fox Sports 2 40 740 √ 32 Fusion 48 √√ 33 FXX 39 743 √ 34 FYI √√ 35 GAC 140 √ 37 Game Show Network 55 √ 38 H2 (History International)98 798 √√ 39 HSN 17 √√√ 40 IFC 859 √√√ 41 Investigation Discovery 109 809 √ 42 Ion Life 171 √√√ 43 Lifetime Movie Network 79 779 √√ 44 National Geographic 100 800 √√ 45 Outdoor Channel 41 741 √ 46 OWN 75 √√ 47 Palladia HD*600 √√ 48 Qubo 170 √√√ 49 QVC 14 714 √√√ 50 Science Channel 104 804 √√ 52 Sprout √ 53 Sundance 160 √√√ 54 TBN 20 √√√ 55 Weather Channel 23 √√√ Regional Sports ($12.95 w/50For50) 1 Comcast Sports -‐ NW Zone 1 11 711 √√ 2 PAC12 (Oregon)35 735 √√ 3 ROOT Sports √ Page 3 of 5 DRAFT (1c) Channel Lineup At-‐A-‐Glance yon d o o 5 0 f o r $ 5 0 Sta r t e r Ba s i c Exp a n d e d Expanded Music Channels (need to confirm channel numbers) 1 Adult Alternative 900 900 √√√ 2 Alternative Rock Classics 905 905 √√√ 3 Baroque 917 917 √√√ 4 Big Band 916 916 √√√ 5 Blue Grass 911 911 √√√ 6 Celtic 946 946 √√√ 7 Chamber Music 918 918 √√√ 8 Classic Masters 919 919 √√√ 9 Classic Rock 901 901 √√√ 10 Country Americana 908 908 √√√ 11 Country Classics 907 907 √√√ 12 Dance Clubbin 922 922 √√√ 13 Disco/Dance Classics 930 930 √√√ 14 Easy Listening 923 923 √√√ 15 Everything 80's 925 925 √√√ 16 Flashback 70's 924 924 √√√ 17 Folk Roots 912 912 √√√ 18 Gospel 938 938 √√√ 19 Hard Rock 904 904 √√√ 20 Hit List 928 928 √√√ 21 Holiday Hits 945 945 √√√ 22 Hot Country 909 909 √√√ 23 Jammin 937 937 √√√ 24 Jazz Masters 913 913 √√√ 25 Jazz Now 914 914 √√√ 26 Jukebox Oldies 929 929 √√√ 27 Kid's Stuff 949 949 √√√ 28 Latino Tejano 943 943 √√√ 29 Latino Tropical 939 939 √√√ 30 Latino Urbano 941 941 √√√ 31 Maximum Party 931 931 √√√ 32 No Fences 910 910 √√√ 33 Nothin but 90's 926 926 √√√ 34 Opera Plus 921 921 √√√ 35 Pop Adult 933 933 √√√ 36 Pop Classics 920 920 √√√ 37 Regional Mexican 944 944 √√√ 38 Retro Latino 942 942 √√√ 39 Retro R&B 934 934 √√√ 40 Rock 902 902 √√√ 41 Rock Alternative 903 903 √√√ 42 Smooth Jazz 915 915 √√√ 43 Soul Storm 932 932 √√√ 44 Standards 927 927 √√√ 45 The Blues 906 906 √√√ 46 The Chill Lounge 947 947 √√√ 47 The Light 935 935 √√√ 48 The Spa 948 948 √√√ 49 Today's Latin Pop 940 940 √√√ 50 Urban Beats 936 936 √√√ Page 4 of 5 DRAFT (1c) Channel Lineup At-‐A-‐Glance yon d o o 5 0 f o r $ 5 0 Sta r t e r Ba s i c Exp a n d e d Premium Channels (need to confirm channels) Cinemax ($14.90) 1 MAX (W) 2 ActionMAX (W) 3 MoreMAX (W) 4 Cinemax (W) HD*410 510 5 MoreMAX (W) HD*411 511 6 ActionMAX (W) HD*412 512 HBO ($15.90) 1 HBO (W)400 500 2 HBO 2 (W)401 501 3 HBO Family (W)402 502 4 HBO Signature (W)403 5 HBO Latino (W)404 6 HBO (W) HD* 7 HBO 2 (W) HD* 8 HBO Family (W) HD* Showtime/TMC/FLIX ($15.90) 1 Showtime (W)420 520 2 Sho 2 (W)421 521 3 Showtime Family (W)422 4 Sho Next (W)423 5 Showtime Showcase (W)424 6 The Movie Channel (W)430 530 7 The Movie Channel Extra (W)431 8 FLIX (W)432 9 Showtime (E) HD* 10 Sho 2 (E) HD* 11 Sho 2 (W) HD* 12 Showtime Showcase (W) HD* 13 The Movie Channel (E) HD* 14 The Movie Channel (W) HD* Starz/Encore ($13.90) 1 Starz (W)440 540 2 Starz Cinema (W)441 541 3 Starz Comedy (E)442 542 4 Starz Kids & Family (W)443 543 5 Encore (W)450 550 6 Encore Action (W)451 7 Encore Love (E)452 8 Encore Westerns (W)455 9 Starz (E) HD* 10 Starz Cinema HD* 11 Starz Comedy (E) HD* 12 Starz Kids & Family (E) HD* 13 Starz Edge (E) HD*544 14 Encore HD* (E) Page 5 of 5 DRAFT (1c) Channel Lineup At-‐A-‐Glance yon d o o 5 0 f o r $ 5 0 Sta r t e r Ba s i c Exp a n d e d Spanish Language (need to confirm channels and channel numbers) Network SD HD 1 Azteca America SD & HD 2 CNN en Espanol 3 Discovery Familia 4 Enlace 5 ESPN Desportes 6 Estrella TV 7 Fox Deportes SD& HD 8 LA TV 9 Mega TV 10 Mexicanal 11 Multimedios TV 12 Mun2 is now NBC Universo 13 Mundo Fox 14 Nat Geo Mundo 15 Telemundo 16 Unimas 17 Univision 18 Univision tinovelas 19 VME Kids 20 ZUUS Latino (music videos) CityCouncilAgenda:06/08/15 1 4D.ConsiderationofapprovingprocessandtermsofsaleforCity-ownedpropertylocated at1022W.RiverStreet (JO/AS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND TheCityCouncilisaskedtoconsidertheprocessandtermsforthesaleoftheCity-owned propertyonWestRiverStreet. TheEDArecentlyplaced“forsale”signsonthreeofitsproperties.Forefficiency,staffhas alsomovedforwardwiththedevelopmentofa“forsale”signfortheWestRiverStreet property.Thesignisinplaceontheproperty. Atthistime,Councilisaskedtoprovidestaffwithdirectionontheresponsedesiredtoany interestgeneratedinthesite. ThepropertyiszonedR-2(SingleandTwo-FamilyResidence)Districtandislocatedjust outsideoftheShorelandandMississippiWildScenicandRecreationalRiverDistricts.The propertyisapproximately16,850squarefeetinarea.Thepropertyissurroundedbysingle- familyusestothewest,eastandsouth. TherearetwobasicdirectionstheCouncilmaywishtotakeonthepropertysale,withsome variationsbasedondirection. 1.Saleofpropertyatasetprice(orpricerange)tobedeterminedpriortosale,withno distinctionastotheuseofthepropertyoutsideofarequirementtomeetbasecode standards. •Underthisoption,theCouncilwouldholdaseparatemeetingtodeterminetheasking pricerangefortheproperty.Subsequentmeeting(s)wouldbeheldtoreviewoffers. •Underthisoption,aduplexcouldbeconstructedonthepropertyasapermitteduse,as theparcelmeetsbasesquarefootagerequirementsforsuchdevelopment. 2.Saleofthepropertyfordevelopment. •IfCouncilwishestoproceedwiththisoption,staffhaspreparedadraftoutlineof termsforCouncilreviewbelow. o Single-familyhomedevelopment;noduplexormulti-familyuse. o Mustmeetbasezoningrequirementswiththefollowingadditional requirements: Mustexceedbasezoningrequirementsforsquarefootageofsingle- familyhomeconstructed–currently1050squarefootfoundationand 2000squarefeetfinishable. Mustconstructatwo-carattachedgarageexceedingbasezoning requirementof450squarefeet. Must meetaminimumof20%ofthefrontbuildingfaçadecovered withbrickorstone.Anyattachedormajordetachedaccessorybuilding thatcanbeseenfromthestreetshallmeetthissamestandard. CityCouncilAgenda:06/08/15 2 Structureswithfrontfacadescoveredbyatleast70%stuccoorreal woodmayreducethebrickorstonecoverageto5%. o Mustinstalllandscapeirrigationsystem. o Mustreceiveacertificateofoccupancywithin2yearsfromclosing. o StaffwillresearchtheCouncil’sabilitytoincludea“rightofreverter” provisionbywhichthepropertywillrevertbacktoCityownershipineventof default. •Underthisoption,theCouncilcouldelecttoopenaformalquoteorbidprocess(as required),withapre-determinedsetoftermssuchasthoseabove.TheCouncilwould requirethatthebuyerenterintoapurchaseanddevelopmentagreementspecifying terms,withthetermsofthedevelopmentagreementsurvivingagainstthesiteafterthe sale. •TheCouncilcouldalsochosetoidentifytermsforanybuyer,butnotruntheformal quoteprocess.Again,theCouncilwouldrequirethatthebuyerenterintoapurchase anddevelopmentagreementspecifyingterms,withthetermsofthedevelopment agreementsurvivingagainstthesiteafterthesale. A1.BudgetImpact:CityCouncilhasindicatedinpriormeetingsandworkshopsthatit wishestodisposeofdevelopableproperties.Thesaleofthispropertywouldhavea positiveimpacttotheCity’sgeneralfund. A2.StaffImpact:StafftimewouldbeconsumedinanyoptionselectedbyCounciland wouldbevariablebasedontheprocessselectedandthenumberofoffersreceived. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS 1.Motiontosellthesubjectpropertyataprice(orpricerange)tobedeterminedbythe Councilpriortosale,withnodistinctionastotheuseofthepropertyoutsideofa requirementtomeetbasecodestandards.Thismotioniscontingentonareviewof processandrequirementswiththeCityAttorney. 2.Motiontosellthepropertyfordevelopmentunderapurchaseanddevelopment agreement,withtheprocessandtermsasdirectedbyCouncil.Thismotioniscontingent onareviewofprocessandrequirementswiththeCityAttorney. 3.Motiontotableforadditionaldiscussionandresearch. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION StaffdeferstoCouncildirectiononthisitem. D.SUPPORTINGDATA WrightCountyParcelDataInformation MonticelloZoningOrdinance,R-2Zoning,excerpt Wright County, MN Date Created: 6/4/2015 Summary Parcel ID 155020005050 Property Address Sec/Twp/Rng 03-121-025 Brief Tax Description Sect-03 Twp-121 Range-025 RIVER TERRACE Lot-005 Block-005 (Note: Not to be used on legal documents) Deeded Acres 0.00 Class 958 - (NON-HSTD) MUNICIPAL PUB-OTHER District (1101) 1101 CITY OF MONTICELLO 882 H School District 0882 Creation Date 01/01/0001 Owner Primary Owner City Of Monticello 505 Walnut St Ste 1 Monticello, MN 55362 GIS Acreage Parcel: 155020005050 Acres: 0.39 Acres USAB: 0.39 Acres WATE: 0.00 Acres ROW: 0.00 Sq Ft: 16,850.52 Land Seq Code CER Dim 1 Dim 2 Dim 3 Units UT Unit Price Adj 1 Adj 2 Adj 3 Adj 4 Eff Rate Div %Value 1 RES I UNIMPROVED LOT 0 0 0 0 1.000 LT 30,000.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30,000.000 1.000 30,000 Total 1.000 30,000 Valuation (working) 2017 +Land Value $30,000 +Building Value $0 +Extra Features Value $0 =Total Value $30,000 % Change 0.00 % Taxation 2015 Payable 2014 Payable 2013 Payable 2012 Payable 2011 Payable Total Estimated Market Value $25,000 $20,000 $20,000 $32,000 $35,000 -Excluded Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -Homestead Exclusion $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 =Taxable Market Value $25,000 $20,000 $20,000 $32,000 $35,000 Net Taxes Due $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 +Special Assessments $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 =Total Taxes Due $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Tax Statements Click here to view the Tax Statements for this parcel. CRV Documents Click here to view the CRV document(s). Property Card Images Click here to view the Property Card image(s). Map No data available for the following modules: Land GA/RP, Buildings, Extra Features, Sales, Transfer History, Valuation, Taxes Paid, Photos, Sketches. Click here for help. DISCLAIMER: Maps and documents made available to the public by Wright County are not legally recorded maps nor surveys and are not intended to be used as such. The maps and documents are created as part of a Geographic Information System (GIS) that compiles records, information, and data from various city, county, state and federal sources. The source data may contain errors. Additionally, maps and documents prepared by the GIS from multiple sources, even if derived from data that is error free, may not be reliable due to differences in the databases or computer programs of the source materials. Wright County has attempted to include more specific clarifications or advisories on the specific documents or maps however, none of the maps or documents should be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact Wright County. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and Wright County shall not be liable for any damages or claims that arise out of the user's access to, or use of the maps, documents and data provided. Last Data Upload: 6/4/2015 9:47:23 AM CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.4 Residential Base Zoning Districts Subsection (E) R-1: Single Family Residence District Page 90 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance TABLE 3-5: R-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) Max Height (stories / feet) Minimum Floor Areas (sq ft) Minimum Building Width (ft) Minimum Roof Pitch & Soffit (vertical rise/ horizontal run) Front Interior Side [1] Street Side Rear [3] Single Family Building 30 10 [2] 20 30 2.5 stories 35 feet 1,050 foundation/ 2,000 finishable [4] 24 5” / 12” no minimum soffit [1]: For interior lots in R-1 and R-A districts, an attached accessory structure may be allowed to meet a 6’ setback, provided that the sum of both side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet.. [2]: Interior side yard setbacks for single family homes on lots of record with a lot width 66 feet or less in the Original Plat of Monticello and Lower Monticello shall be at least six (6) feet. [3]: The required rear yard shall consist of a space at least 30-feet in depth across the entire width of the lot that is exclusive of wetlands, ponds, or slopes greater than 12 percent. [4]: Finishable square footage is exclusive of attached accessory space. Accessory Structures  An attached garage shall be included with all principal residential structures in the R-1 district.  See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures.  The minimum floor area for all attached accessory structures shall be 550 sq. ft.  See footnote [1] above as related to setbacks for attached accessory structures on interior lots. Other Regulations to Consult (not all inclusive)  Section 3.3, Common District Requirements  Section 3.4(B), Standards Applicable to All Residential Base Zoning Districts  Section 4.11, Building Materials  Section 4.8, Off-Street Parking  Section 4.1, Landscaping and Screening Standards CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.4 Residential Base Zoning Districts Subsection (F) R-2: Single and Two Family Residence District City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 91 Typical R-2 Lot Configuration (F) R-2: Single and Two Family Residence District Section 3.4 (F) R-2 Single and Two-Family Residence District The purpose of the "R-2" single and two-family residential district is to provide for low to moderate density one and two unit dwellings and directly related complementary uses. Maximum Density through PUD or Performance Standards = 5,445 sq. ft. per unit (8.0 units per gross acre) Base Density Unit Type Minimum Lot Area/Unit Base Density Single Family 10,000 square feet 4.3 units/acre Duplex/Two-Family 7,000 square feet 6.2 units/acre Townhome * 7,000 square feet 6.2 units/acre Multi-Family (3-4 units) * 10,000 sq ft for 1st unit + 4,000 sq ft for each additional unit 5.9 – 6.7 units/acre * By Conditional Use Permit Only Minimum Lot Width R-2 District Original Plat Lot Width 80 feet 66 feet Typical R-2 Building Types