Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Resolution 1969-01
".~: _f ,. ~.., RESC?LU~'IC3N NO. 89 RESOLUTION SUPPORTT~tG AI30~'TION t~F HOUSE FILE 80 RELATIVE TO INTOXICATING LIQUOR,: FL~tMTTTING "QN-~AI,.~E" PRIVATE LICENSES TN CITIES, VILLAGES, 4R BOR©UC3HS L~FIRATTNG MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORES: ANtENDiNQ A~N1~ESfSTA STATUTES 196?, CHAPTER 34a r rrr..wr rr err rrr •r rrrrr..r rrr rtrrr r~r rrr rr rrr rr~rrrrr rrr rr rrrrrrrr r..rr WHEREAa, the brand owners, end Minnesota liquor wholesalers through their lobby ha~*e marshalled intense opposition and successfully prevented legislation which would permit i+~suance of on-preanise consumption of intoxicating liquors white retaining municipal olf and on sale facilittee;from being presented upon the floor of the Mtnn:s~ota House and Senate, thereby apparently protecting certain private interests at the expense of the public .interest; and WHEREAS, eirice the 1967 seesioa of the Lsgialature, citisen demand fora "split liquor" option has continually increa,~ed and broadened; and WHEREAS, the economics of a "split liquor" feature would enhancQ the revenue squseae being increasingly. experienced by local government, while not adversely affecting the control iactt-r of liquor consumption nvr the interests, of the liquor lobby: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Vili~g~r Council of the Village of Monticello as follows: 1. The Village Council endorses and +~upports legislatior- presented in the 1969 session of the Minnee~ota Legislature, specifically `House File 60, which would permit municipalities that now or in the future may operate municipal liquor diepensartes t© issue private licenses-for the onrsale consumption of into~ctcating liquors whtle retaining .municipal off and on facilities. ~. The representatives of the ctitxens of the Village.af Monticello, both in the Senate and House of Repreasentatives, ors herea-ith urged to support such legislation. ;' ~~~ ~ q ~~ ~ o ,~ ~, Dated: lC~-~~~ ~~~C~' / ~,~' --5-' ,. -~ ?..} ~ ay~r ,, i ~.~-- ' `r ATTEST. ~ -~..... ~i` ~' ~'F" .~ . ` Clerk ... ,.F`, The motion fAr the m~dAptEQn of the foregoing resolution was duly, seconded by councilman ~, .'~,~~~~ a-nd upon vote being taken thereon, ih~ following voted to fa~ior thereof: and the following voted against the same:. whereupon sold resolution was declared duly paesed`an~ adopted.