EDA Agenda 04-13-2016AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA)
Wednesday, April 131h, 2016 — 6:00 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
SPECIAL MEETING
5:00 p.m. Academy Room
WSB — Environmental Study Updates
Commissioners: President Bill Demeules, Vice President Bill Tapper, Treasurer Steve
Johnson, Tracy Hinz, James Davidson, and Council members Tom Perrault and Lloyd Hilgart
Staff: Executive Director Jeff O'Neill, Angela Schumann, Wayne Oberg
Guest: Jim Gromberg — WSB & Associates
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approve Meeting Minutes:
a. Special Meeting — March 9th, 2016 (to be provided)
b. Regular Meeting — March 9th, 2016 (to be provided)
4. Consideration of additional agenda items
5. Consideration of approving payment of bills
6. Consideration of marketing partnership with Monticello Times for 2016 Manufacturing
Magazine
7. Consideration to adopt Resolution EDA- 2016 -002 approving an Assignment and
Assumption of Contract for Private Development between Masters 5th Avenue and the
Monticello EDA for Tax Increment Financing District 1 -22 as related to the Landmark I
proj ect
8. Consideration to direct preparation of an Amendment to the Contract for Private
Development between Masters 5th Avenue and the Monticello EDA and modification of
Tan Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District 1 -35
9. Consideration of contract notice for Market Matching services
10. Consideration of Director's Report
11. Adjourn
EDA Agenda: 4/13/16
5. Consideration of approving payment of bills (WO)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Accounts Payable summary statements listing bills submitted during the previous
month are included for review.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve payment of bills through March 2016.
2. Motion to approve payment of bills through March 2016 with changes as
directed by the EDA.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 91.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Accounts Payable Summary Statements
Accounts Payable
CITY OF
Transactions by Account 0
User: Debbie.Davidson Monti effo
Printed: 03/09/2016 - 2:12PM
Batch: 00203.03.2016
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No
213 - 46301 - 430400 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHAR] General EDA Matters through 1/31/16 03/15/2016 115522 398.90
Vendor Subtotal for Dept:46301 398.90
213-46301-431990 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC BLK034 - Fred's Auto ARM Survey - . 03/15/2016 0 294.00
213-46301-431990 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Economic Development & Market Ma 03/15/2016 0 4,000.00
Vendor Subtotal for Dept:46301 4,294.00
213-46301-431990 HARRY LANTTO EDA Meeting Recording 2/10/16 03/15/2016 0 60.00
Vendor Subtotal for Dept:46301 60.00
213 - 46301 - 443990 ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA C Job Posting on Website - EDA Mgr 03/15/2016 115493 50.00
Vendor Subtotal for Dept:46301 50.00
213 - 46535 - 430400 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHAR] TIE 1 -35 -General EDA Matters throu 03/15/2016 115522 1,235.00
Vendor Subtotal for Dept:46535 1,235.00
Subtotal for Fund: 213 6,037.90
AP- Transactions by Account (03/09/2016 - 2:12 PM) Page 1
Account Number
Vendor
Description
The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment.
Date: 4/13/2016 Approved by
Steve Johnson - Treasurer
GL Date Check No
Report Total:
Amount PO No
6,037.90
AP- Transactions by Account (03/09/2016 - 2:12 PM) Page 2
Accounts Payable
CITY OF
Transactions by Account 0
User: Julie.Cheney Monti effo
Printed: 03/23/2016 - 1:39PM
Batch: 00206.03.2016
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No
213-46301-431990 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC EDA - Manufacturing Expansion Projc 03/29/2016 115593 850.00
Vendor Subtotal for Dept:46301 850.00
213 - 46301 - 433100 KERRY BURRI Mileage (2.1 miles) EDA Agenda Pack 03/29/2016 0 1.13
Vendor Subtotal for Dept:46301 1.13
213 - 46301 - 437100 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR -TREAS R155- 171 - 000060 1st & 2nd Half Pay 03/29/2016 115615 1,318.00
Vendor Subtotal for Dept:46301 1,318.00
213 - 46522 - 443990 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR -TREAS R155- 010 - 067010 1st & 2nd Half Pay 03/29/2016 115615 1,126.02
Vendor Subtotal for Dept:46522 1,126.02
Subtotal for Fund: 213 3,295.15
The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment.
Report Total: 3,295.15
Date: 4/13/16 Approved by
Steve Johnson - Treasurer
AP- Transactions by Account (03/23/2016 - 1:39 PM) Page 1
Accounts Payable
Transactions by Account
User: Debbie.Davidson
Printed: 04/01/2016 - 9:15AM
Batch: 00215.03.2016
Account Number
Vendor Description
Monticello
GL Date Check No Amount PO No
213 - 46522 - 438100 XCEL ENERGY ZCULPS 510623082 -8 03/31/2016 0 17.95
Vendor Subtotal for Dept:46522 17.95
The preceding list of bills payable was reveiwed and approved for payment.
Date: 4/13/16 Approved by
Steve Johnson - Treasurer
Subtotal for Fund: 213 17.95
Report Total: 17.95
AP- Transactions by Account (04/01/2016 - 9:15 AM) Page 1
EDA Agenda: 04/13/16
6. Consideration of marketing partnership with Monticello Times for 2016 Manufacturing
Magazine (AS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
In February and March, the EDA heard from the Monticello Times regarding a proposed
publication focusing on Monticello's manufacturing sector. The Times presented an initial
outline on the piece. The item was tabled for additional review and information.
The Times intends the approximately 20 -page publication to provide community information
pertinent to attracting and retaining manufacturing and to highlight numerous industries within
the community.
Staff have had the opportunity to meet with representatives from the Times regarding cost,
distribution and the ability to use the piece as a cross - purpose marketing tool for the city. The
Times has indicated that City staff would have a great deal of creative control, assisting in
development of the piece's layout and content. The product would be owned by the City of
Monticello and can be updated and printed on an as- needed basis after the initial run of copies.
The initial run will include pockets on front and back cover, into which the City can place
customized financial package information, sales sheets and other community information
produced through Market Matching efforts. The piece will also be produced in digital format,
with interactive links and video. The product will be launched on the migrated EDA website.
The Monticello Times has provided a revised outline for the project and will be present at the
meeting to provide additional information and answer questions.
Al. Budget Impact: The Times has requested the commitment of $3,000 from the EDA for a
run of 1,000 pieces (with folder pockets on front and back), as well as a fully interactive
digital piece. The EDA's 2016 marketing budget is $5,000.
A2. Staff Impact: If the EDA elects to move forward, staff will work with the Monticello
Times, as well as local brokers and manufacturers to develop content and focus.
B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this expense. Staff believes a piece can be developed, distributed
and utilized in a manner supportive of the cost investment. In working with a number of
business leads over the past several months, this type of product would be a valuable tool in
representing a professional look and in telling the community's story to potential businesses.
C. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve development of a 2016 Monticello Times manufacturing publication
and to authorize an expenditure of $3,000 toward the publication.
2. Motion to table action for further research and discussion.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Monticello Times Proposal
Monticello Industry /Manufacturing Magazine
Format
This magazine can go strictly digital with the ability to print copies as needed.
The City and EDA would determine the content and would have say over the layout /design /looks.
Participating industries would have their websites linked to this magazine. We also have the ability to produce
business videos. We currently have a full staff of videographers who are schooled and experienced and who can
help you create your own "commercial." Industries can use the video in this magazine but also anywhere else they
would like. It's theirs to keep, including Facebook, the background of a booth at a trade show or convention, or
motivating workers or honoring them for special accomplishments.
Goal
The purpose of this piece is to be a recruiting tool for potential commercial manufacturing /industrial businesses as
well as a tool to encourage and recruit skilled workers. This will be a "Must See" link for anyone thinking of starting
a business in Monticello.
We would like to have this piece completed and printed in time to hand out at the Annual Industrial Breakfast in
October. We need to have this ready for print by Sept. 2 and we would ask for 4 months to create and sell the
product which means ideally we need to know this month if the city is able to provide financial support.
Distribution
To be determined by City /EDA. Ideas include all digital, part digital or part print. We feel this would be a great
marketing piece for the city's new economic development manager. The digital file is yours to keep and use as
much or as little as you choose. The Monticello Times would like to be considered for handling future
updates /changes /deletes for a fee.
How do we make this happen?
We would work closely with the City and EDA for content. We are asking the EDA for $3,000 which would include a
digital version and 1,000 print copies (20 pages full color, with pockets in front and back covers). Monticello Times
would ask local manufacturers to support this piece by purchasing a full page spot (at a reduced rate) highlighting
their business and why they like Monticello. The Monticello Times will compile all of the information, do design
and layout and format for online and print use. The City will ultimately have the final say in its design.
We believe that this piece can have the potential of bringing in area manufacturers generating additional tax
revenue. New industry also may mean new residents as workers look to move into a Star City community such as
Monticello to be closer to their work, shortening their commute time. We also believe that Monticello and the
county have excellent opportunities for unskilled workers to learn machining and other trades and give them a job
opportunity with above average wages. All of these things benefit the industries, the housing market, our school
system and local businesses. I can't estimate what that all means in dollars and cents but I do know that it far
outweighs the $3,000 investment we are asking of the EDA.
If for any reason the Monticello Times determines that cost are higher than projected, that we have the right to
cancel this project. This includes cancelling sales, editorial and layout.
I appreciate your time and willingness to consider this joint project. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Respectfully,
Terri Sweet
EDA Agenda: 04/13/16
7. Consideration to adopt Resolution EDA- 2016 -002 approving an Assignment and
Assumption of Contract for Private Development Between Master's Fifth Avenue,
Inc. and Laxmi Hotel, Inc., as related to Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -22,
Landmark Square L (AS)
Masters Fifth Avenue, developer of the Landmark Square I project, has requested that the
EDA adopt a resolution consenting to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement
relating to the tax increment for the project, which is within TIF District 1 -22.
In 2001, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and Masters Fifth Avenue. entered
into a Contract for Private Development for the Landmark Square I development project.
Under the Contract, the HRA agreed to reimburse Masters Fifth Avenue for a portion of
the costs of acquisition of the development site and site improvements through tax
increment generated in the district.
Masters Fifth Avenue has requested that the contract now be assigned to Laxmi Hotel, Inc.
Upon approval and execution of the assignment and assumption, Laxmi Hotel, Inc. will
receive the available tax increment and will assume the continuing rights and obligations
of the contract. The TIF note is set to terminate in 2023.
Staff has verified that a certificate of completion for required development improvements
is on file. The assignment and assumption is not an amendment of any of the other terms
of the contract. Under the contract, the developer is not required to obtain the EDA's
approval of any assignment after completion of the required improvements. However,
since the developer is requesting execution by the EDA of a consent to the assignment, it
is recommended that the EDA approve the assignment and execution of the consent by
resolution.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt Resolution EDA- 2016 -002 approving an Assignment and
Assumption Agreement Between Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc. and Laxmi Hotel,
Inc.
2. Motion of other.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the resolution and the corresponding execution of the
assignment and assumption agreement consent.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Resolution EDA- 2016 -002
B. Assignment and Assumption Agreement and Consent
C. Excerpt, TIF Management Plan
1
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION NO. EDA- 2015 -002
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION
AGREEMENT BETWEEN MASTER'S FIFTH AVENUE, INC.
AND LAXMI HOTEL, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Commissioners ('Board ") of the City of Monticello
Economic Development Authority ( "Authority ") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello (the
"HRA and Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc. (the "Assignor ") entered into a Contract for Private
Development dated as of September 18, 2001, as amended (the "Contract ").
1.02. Pursuant to the Contract, the HRA agreed to reimburse Assignor for a portion of
Assignor's costs of acquisition, demolition, and parking improvements on the Development
Property through Available Tax Increment.
1.03. In 2007, the HRA and the Authority consolidated operations, and the Contract was
assigned by the HRA to the Authority.
1.04. The Assignor completed construction of the required improvements on the
Development Property and received a Certificate of Completion on June 19, 2003.
1.05. Assignor now wishes to assign its rights and obligations under the Contract to
Laxmi Hotel, Inc. (the "Assignee "), and to assign the right to receive Available Tax Increment to
Assignee, and Assignee wishes to assume such rights and obligations under the Contract and
accept the assignment of the Available Tan Increment, and to that end the Assignor and Assignee
have proposed to enter into an Assignment and Assumption Agreement (the "Assignment ").
1.06. The Board has reviewed the Assignment and finds that the approval and execution of
the Authority's consent thereto are in the best interest of the City and its residents.
Section 2. AuthoritApproval, Other Proceedings.
2.01. The Assignment, including the attached Consent of the Authority related thereto, as
presented to the Board is hereby in all respects approved.
2.02. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of
the Authority the Consent attached to the Assignment and any other documents requiring execution
by the Authority in order to carry out the transaction described in the Assignment.
2.03. Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry
out the intent of this resolution.
477887vI MNIMN190 -95
Approved by the Board of Commissioners of the City of Monticello Economic
Development Authority this 13th day of April, 2016.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
477887vI MNIMN190 -95
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is
executed as of the day of April, 2016, by and between Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation ( "Assignor ") and Laxmi Hotel, Inc., an Iowa corporation. ( "Assignee ")
RECITALS:
1. Assignor has on the date hereof sold to Assignee ( "Sale ") all of its right, title and
interest in and to real property described as Lots 13, 14 and 15, Block 36, Monticello, Wright
County, Minnesota ( "Premises ").
2. Assignor and the Premises are subject and party to that certain Contract for
Private Development with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Monticello dated the 18' day of September, 2001, and amended by the First Amendment to
Contract for Private Development dated the 6' day of February, 2002 (collectively
"Development Agreement "),
3. Assignor desires to assign all of its interest in the Development Agreement to
Assignee in connection with the Sale.
4. Assignee desires to acquire Assignor's interest in the Development Agreement
and to assume, perform and undertake all of the remaining obligations and covenants of Assignor
thereunder from and after the date hereof.
5. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello has
been dissolved and has transferred all of its rights and obligations under existing development
agreements, including the Development Agreement to the City of Monticello Economic
Development Authority ( "EDA ") pursuant to Resolution 2007 -86 adopted by the Monticello City
Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Assignor hereby warrants and represents that it has performed all obligations of
under the Development Agreement through the date hereof, and that it has received no notice
from the EDA of the existence of any default thereunder, and hereby grants, assigns, transfers
and sets over to Assignee all right, title and interest which it has as Developer. Assignor shall
indemnify and hold Assignee harmless of any and all obligations under the Development
Agreement accruing prior to the date hereof.
2. Assignee hereby accepts the foregoing Assignment of Development Agreement
and hereby assumes and agrees to perform all obligations of Developer in regard to the
Development Agreement described therein from and after the date hereof, and agrees to
indemnify and hold Assignor harmless of any and all liabilities, obligations, claims and debts
which may arise or be asserted against Assignor under the Development Agreement, whenever
arising or asserted that accrue after the date hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Assignor has caused this instrument to be executed this
day of April, 2016
Page 1 of 2
ASSIGNOR: ASSIGNEE:
Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc. Laxmi Hotel, Inc.
By: By:
Its: Its:
Consent of EDA
Upon due deliberation and consideration, and in accordance with the authorization of the
City of Monticello Economic Development Authority ( "EDA ") by resolution duly adopted on the
13th day of April, 2016, the undersigned does hereby consent to and accept the assignment of the
Contract for Private Development, dated the 18' day of September, 2001, as amended by the
First Amendment to Contract for Private Development dated the 6' day of February, 2002
(collectively "Development Agreement "), described in the foregoing Assignment and
Assumption of Contract for Private Development by Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc., as Assignor, to
Laxmi Hotel, Inc., as Assignee, and the assumption of all obligations of the Developer
thereunder by said Assignee. Further the EDA hereby releases Assignor under the Development
Agreement from any and all obligations, liabilities and responsibilities for the performance of the
obligations and duties of the developer thereunder from and after the date hereof,
City of Monticello Economic Development
Authority
By:
Its:
Page 2 of 2
A
L
E
EP
N
u
H
'A
®®
cc
D
N rq V C D\ m m ON O C) N 00 O Ln
+'O V\1 O O O _ M 00 N
N M M M M IQ^ 00
CL Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
_O 00
M ^
O d' ^ O O0 O
C O O O O
O O ui Vl O O NO O OLn
N to t0 N M t0 O O O M OO
OM MO
0 M OM
O O 9 O O O O O
o 0 0 0 0 o o o M o M o:$ o o o 0
30 m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 7 o 7 o 7 o 0
Ln LA in U, LA LA L� A L� L� vi vi ui UA Ui 0 Lm 0 Ui
Ln in vi Ln Ln in Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln in in Ln Ln Ln Ln in in
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M \D N 10 V1 M O 10 O M O l0 N 10 to V W
O O O O O OO M O 10 O _O O _O O O_
�D 1l, N V O 00 �D
M E/1 O Ln Ln O O N O M O M O M O M
4 O O 9 O O O O O O O 4 O O O O O O O
O O
Cc? O O O O I O n O n O O O O
N 4 O O O O 4 O O O 7 O M Q 7O O7 O
'V Ln V1 Ln Ln Ln In U1 Ln to U1 In Ln to U1 UI Ln Ln Ln In
ra
In ll1 In lf1 In lI1 V1 V1 L!1 In In In Ln Ln In V1 U1 111 ll1
i m
v C % ra X
of N o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O
ON O
6 i 3C •UN u NO M I� 00 M o 00 O N O M M N 10
C%
O — O O O O o -t O n o O O
N Ln N O N OO) X l trOOD O N O v 10
N 0 O M O M M O M O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
i C C Y O u O O O O O O O O MO M O m O V'� O O
3 O ` Ql N fxp rxp rO O O 4 O O O o O 7 O O O 7 O 7 O 7
E z i s O
U. r H m a � Ln Ln m Lh Ln Ln Ln Ln Ji v� LA vi LA U vi Ui
7 >. Y +• N i6 +-' a+ vi �n Ln to v2 v2 v1
z " OJ O C C C C r
O r rw- �, O '" O O 41 `n O tt
� a, �" r- ems+ O W 7� y O U O N ¢ Lo C
D ^O C3 v7 2� c+n " .O Z ��—+ 00 � O ffl - .2
l�"+� �+" bA O .moi ter Q" � "D t 4 � w
v V +� t� C V +, T3 �n " aJ ice , m � . � 4 ° cn
V N a, bA N N N N T� ij cV +�+ O Ef? V N
NO
w �
N o N w N O w0 CC O N m Q N
du a, .w oA a, oA p a, o ,s, oA v .5
t1. 9 v �+bo N v O sN `� N O N V V
.., �1, O O aX, U U) C A. O a M y r-4C� aJ s pip 0°
Q V waj
ca v
v
0 0 Q. V x 9 x g V
N
District 1 -20 is a redevelopment TIF district established
for the construction of 10 single - family housing units.
The tax increment from the District is used to support
two obligations. The first obligation is a $65,000 in-
ternal fund loan. Fifty -four percent (54 %) of the tax
increment is used to repay this loan from the EDA.
The balance outstanding on the loan as of 12/31/2011 is
$10,957. The second obligation is a note to reimburse
the developer for land acquisition expense. The note is
currently held by Riverwood Bank. The $65,000 note
is paid with 36% of the annual tax increment ending
no later than 8/1/2018. The balance outstanding on the
note as of 12/31/2011 is $76,723 (including interest ac-
crual). The District will be decertified no later than
December 31, 2024.
Actions Taken Since 2009
Annual payments on the outstanding interfund loan
and note have continued.
Administrative Tasks
The TIF plan estimates on file with the Office of the
State Auditor (OSA) for this district needs review to
confirm the OSA has the correct authorized expendi-
tures amounts.
Management Strategy
Option 1- Discharge Obligations
The focus of this District will be the repayment of the
loan and note. Under the assumptions used in this
report, the District has sufficient tax increment fund
balance to pay both the loan and the note. The EDA
could act to discharge the loan and the note with exist-
ing fund balance.
Projections suggest that future years tax increment col-
lections will not be sufficient to fully pay the developer
CityNumber ...................................................................... ...........................1 -20
CountyNumber ................................
............................... ............................620
Name.................................................................
............................... Prairie West
Type..........................................................
............................... Redevelopment
Established..............................................................
............................... 6/24/96
Certification Requested ..................................
............................... 12/20/96
Certified................................................................
............................... 12/23/96
Year of First Increment ...................
............................... ...........................1999
4 -Year Knockdown ............................................
............................... 12/23/00
5 -Year Rule ...........................................................
............................... 12/23/01
Decertification ....................................................
............................... 12/31/24
Original Tax Rate .......................... ...............................
.....................110.581%
Original Tax Capacity Value ..........
............................... ..........................3,000
Current Base Tax Capacity Value
............................... ..........................1,672
Current (Pay 2012) Tax Capacity ..............................
.........................18,323
Parcels....................................................................................
.............................12
155-104-001010
155-104-001020
155-104-001030
155-104-001040
155-104-001130
155-104-001140
155-104-001150
155-104-001160
155-104-001170
155-104-001180
155-104-001190
155-104-001200
note prior to its ending date of 8/1/2018. Rather than
discharge the note with existing fund balance, the EDA
could decide to increase the share of annual increment
applied to the note after the loan is paid in 2012.
The District can be decertified once the loan and note
are fully paid. The timing of decertification will de-
pend on decisions made about use of fund balance for
payments. Under either of these scenarios, use of fund
balance or no use of fund balance for payments, the
District Summary
District 1 -20 (Prairie
West)
Redevelopment
1.20
24
EDA Agenda: 04/13/16
8. Consideration to direct preparation of an Amendment to the Contract for Private
Development between Masters Fifth Avenue and the Monticello EDA and
modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District
1 -35. (AS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Masters Fifth Avenue has requested that the EDA consider amendment of the Contract for
Private Development between Masters Fifth Avenue and the Monticello EDA, and
modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for TIF District 1 -35.
At this time, the developer is not requesting additional tax increment, but rather a
modification to allow for language revisions accommodating an "11,000 square foot of
more commercial, residential or multi -use building ". At present, the TIF Plan and contract
for development specify development of an "11,000 square foot retail center" in the TIF
District.
TIF District 1 -35 was certified in 2006, and was created to fund $170,000 in costs
associated with the development of a proposed 11,000 square foot retail commercial
project known as "Landmark Square II ". The project area is a single parcel located at the
northeast corner of Yd and Locust Streets. The tax increment generated in the district was
intended to reimburse the developer for land acquisition through "pay -as- you -go" TIF
assistance.
The EDA approved an extension of the contract between the EDA and the developer in
October of 2015 as related to TIF District 1 -35. At that time, the developer indicated there
was the potential for an exclusively residential project on the TIF district parcel. As the
EDA is aware, the developer has submitted a land use application (CCD Residential
Overlay rezoning request), as well as a Development Stage Planned Unit Development
application through the City's Community Development Department. The applications
submitted illustrate a 23 -unit residential project on the parcel.
If the EDA is willing to consider the amendment and modification of the district as
proposed, staff will have the EDA's attorney prepare the required documents for EDA
decision in May. The City Council must also approve the TIF Plan Modification.
However, no public hearing or other public notifications are required for this type of
modification.
Al. Budget Impact: Per the contract with the developer, the developer will be required
to cover all costs associated with the modification.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: An estimated 4 hours of staff and consulting time has
been spent to -date in reviewing and responding to this most recent request.
1
EDA Agenda: 03/09/16
B. STAFF RECOMMWNDATION:
As noted, the amendment of the contract and modification of the TIF District is a policy
question for the EDA. When the TIF district was created, it was intended to spur and
support private commercial redevelopment. If the EDA supports the proposed amendment
and modification, Alternative 91 is recommended. If the EDA wishes to proceed under the
original TIF Plan and contract as recently amended, Alternative 92 is appropriate.
C. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to direct preparation of an Amendment to the Contract for Private
Development between Masters 5t' Avenue and the Monticello EDA and modification
of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District 1 -35.
2. Motion of no action.
Motion to table this item for additional information.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Developer Request, March 18th, 2016
B. TIF Plan 1 -35, excerpt
C. TIF Management Plan, excerpt for TIF 1 -35
D. Third Amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment
Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc.
19 577 180th Ave NW
Big Lake, MN 55309
763 - 390 -0393
March 18, 2016
TO:
Monticello Economic Development Authority
505 Walnut Street
Monticello, MN 55362
March 18, 2016
Attention: Angela Schumann
We request consideration at your meeting of April 13th to consider an
administrative change to the TIF District 1 -35 by amending the contract and TIF
plan with Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc. to add the words "11,000 square foot or
more commercial, residential or multi -use building" in place of the words "11,000
square foot retail center" in both documents.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc.
Barry D. Fluth, president
Ehlers & Associates, Inc.
Talc Increment Financing District Overview
City of Monticello
Tax Increment Financing District No, 1 -35
The following summary contains an overview of the basic elements of the Tax increment Financing PIan
for TIF District No. 1 -35. More detailed information on each of these topics can be found in the complete
TIF Plan.
Proposed action: Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -35 (District)
and the adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan).
Adoption of a Redevelopment Plan Modification for the Central
Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1. (The Modification is to
include the project activities anticipated in the District.)
Type of TIF District: A redevelopment district
Parcel Numbers *: 155- 010 - 036011 **
155- 010 -036010 **
155 -010- 036030 **
*These parcels will be combined via an administrative lot combination
by the City of Monticello
**These parcels are "Knocked Down" parcels that are being removed
from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -22 to be included in Tax
Increment Financing District No. 1 -35.
Proposed Development: The District is being created to facilitate construction of 11,000 s.£ of
commercial space consisting of a restaurant, office and other uses in the
City of Monticello. This project is being proposed by a local
developer. The value of the new development is estimated to be $70
per s.f. plus land costs of approximately $230,000 for an esimated
value of $1,000,000. The building will be completed in 2006 and the
assistance of land acquisition, public improvements, site preparation,
streets and sidewalks and utility costs will be funded on a pay- as -you-
go basis at a rate of 6.5%
TIF District Overview
Maximum duration: The duration of the District will be 25 years from the date of receipt of
the first increment (26 years of increment). The date of receipt of the
first tax increment will be approximately 2008. Thus, it is estimated
that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for
subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2033, or
when the TIF Plan is satisfied.
Estimated annual tax Up to $17,014
increment:
Proposed uses: The TIF Plan contains a budget that authorizes the maximum amount
that may be expended:
Land/Building Acquisition ............................................... $ 100,000
Site Improvements /Preparation ................... $35,000
.......................
Public Utilities .................................... ............................... $35,000
Parking Facilities ........... :................................................... $35,000
Streets and Sidewalks ......................... ............................... $10,000
Interest.............................................. ............................... $190,000
Administrative Costs (up to 10 %) .............. ........................ $45,000
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS ............... .............................45
See Subsection 2 -10, page 2 -6 of the TIF Plan for the full budget
authorization. Additional uses of funds are authorized which include
inter -fund loans and transfers and bonded indebtedness.
Form of financing: Financing will be primarily by a pay -as- you -go (PAYG) note.
Administrative fee: Up to 10% of annual increment, if costs are justified.
Interfund Loan Requirement: If the City wants to pay for administrative expenditures from a tax
increment fund, it is recommended that a resolution authorizing a loan
from another fund must be passed PRIOR to the issuance of the check.
4 Year Activity Rule After four years from the date of certification of the District one of the
(§ 469.176 Subd b) following activities must have been commenced on each parcel in the
District:
• Demolition
Rehabilitation
• Renovation
• Other site preparation (not including utility services such as
sewer and water)
• If the activity has not been started by the approximately
September, 2009, no additional tax increment may be taken
from that parcel until the commencement of a qualifying
activity.
Page 2
TIF District Overview
5 Year Rule Within 5 years of certification revenues derived from tax increments
ff 469.1763 Sub 3) must be expended or obligated to be expended. Tax increments are
considered to have been expended on an activity within the District if
one of the following occurs:
• The revenues are actually paid to a third party with respect to
the activity
• Bonds, the proceeds of which must be used to finance the
activity, are issued and sold to a third party, the revenues are
spent to repay the bonds, and the proceeds of the bonds either
are reasonably expected to be spent before the end of the later
of (i) the five year period, or (ii) a reasonable temporary period
within the meaning of the use of that term under §. 148(c)(1) of
the Internal Revenue Code, or are deposited in a reasonably
required reserve or replacement fund
• Binding contracts with a third party are entered into for
performance of the activity and the revenues are spent under
the contractual obligation
• Costs with respect to the activity are paid and the revenues are
spent to reimburse for payment of the costs, including interest
on unreimbursed costs.
Any obligations in the Tax Increment District made after
approximately September, 2010, will not be eligible for repayment
from tax increments.
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the TIF Plan for the District, as
required pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd 3, are included in Exhibit A of the City Council
Adopting Resolution.
Page 3
TiF District Overview
MAPS OF CENTRAL MONTICELLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. I
AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-35
Page 4
.Mt-M A.
Proposed Tax Incren...c Financing District No
Central Monticello Redevelopment Project N
City of Monticello
Wright County, Minnesota
Proposed Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1 -35
District 1 -35 is a redevelopment TIF district. The Dis-
trict was established to assist with the construction of
11,000 square foot commercial building. The District
was created from parcels removed from District 1 -22.
This approach established new time limits that con-
strain use of increments in District 1 -22. The tax incre-
ment from District 1 -35 is obligated to repay a $170,000
developer note at an interest rate of 6 %. The note will
end at a date no later than 2/1/2023. Ninety percent
(90 %) of annual tax increment is used to make pay-
ment on the note. The District will be decertified no
later than December 31, 2033.
The development planned for District 1 -35 has not
happened.
Actions Taken Since 2009
Funds have been transferred into TIF District 1 -35
from TIF District 1 -22 to cover administrative expenses
incurred for TIF 1 -35.
Administrative Steps
There are no outstanding administrative items
Management Strategy
The strategy for District 1 -35 focuses on using the ex-
isting district to undertake redevelopment on this par-
cel. The factors that allow the creation of a new re-
development district have been removed. A new TIF
district is not an option.
Clearance of the site satisfied the criteria of the 4 -year
knock down requirements.
Management of this District benefits from 2009 amend-
ments to the TTF Act. The limitations of the five -year
rule are extended to ten years for the District. Obli-
gations for the use of tax increments must now be in
CityNumber .......... ............................... ............ ........................................... 1 -35
CountyNumber ............................................... ............... ........................... 635
Name ........................... ............................... .......................Landmark Square 11
Type.......................................................... ............................... Redevelopment
Established......................................
............................... ........................9 /12/05
Certification Requested
.................................... .............................12 /29/05
Certified..................................................................... ............................... 8/1/06
Year of First Increment ................... ............................... ...........................2008
4-Year Knockdown
8/1/12
5-Year Rule ................................................................. ..............................8 /1/16
Decertification .......................... ............................... ..........................12 /31 /33
Original Tax Rate ....................... ............................... ........................110.297%
Original Tax Capacity Value .......... ............................... ..........................3,409
Current Base Tax Capacity Value ............................... ..........................6,068
Current (Pay 2012) Tax Capacity . ............................... ..........................2,962
Parcels.................................................................................... ............................... l
155- 010 - 036030
place by August 1, 2016.
The financial implications and options for this District
cannot be fully analyzed until development occurs.
District Summary
District 1 -35 (Landmark
Square II)
Redevelopment
43
THIRD AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
This agreement is made as of December _9, 2015, by and between the CITY OF
MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body politic and
corporate (the "EDA ") and MASTERS FIFTH AVENUE, INC., a Minnesota corporation (the
"Developer ").
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello
( "HRA ") and Developer entered into that certain Contract for Private Development dated
September 7, 2005, as amended by an Amendment thereto dated as of June 7, 2006 and a Second
Amendment thereto dated as of December 18, 2007 (as so amended, the "Contract ") providing,
among other things, for the construction of an approximately 11,000 square foot retail center, with
associated parking, known as Landmark Square II (the "Minimum Improvements ") on the property
legally described within the Contract (the "Development Property ") within the City of Monticello
(the "City "); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City has taken the necessary steps to allocate all
powers and projects of the HRA to the EDA, and the HRA, by its Resolution No. 2007 -085, dated
October 22nd, 2008, has transferred and assigned to the EDA all outstanding contracts to which the
HRA_ is a party, including the Contract; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested and the EDA has determined to extend the dates
of commencement and completion of construction of the Minimum Improvements described in the
Contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the
parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows:
Section 3.4(a) of the Contract is amended as follows:
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement, the Land Acquisition Costs will
be reimbursed to the Developer with simple interest thereon 6.50% per annum, interest commencing
to accrue on the date that the Developer complies with the cost certification requirement described
in paragraph (f) of this Section. The Land Acquisition Costs will be reimbursed by the Authority to
the Developer in semi - annual installments payable on each February 1 and August 1 ( "Payment
Dates ") commencing August 1, 2022 and concluding no later than the Termination Date. These
payments will be made from Available Tax Increment as defined in this Section 3.4 and from no
other source.
2. Section 4.3 of the Contract is amended as follows:
(c) Commencement and Completion of Construction. Subject to Unavoidable Delays, the
Developer shall commence construction of the Minimum Improvements by November 1, 2020.
Subject to Unavoidable Delays, the Developer shall complete the construction of the Minimum
Improvements by December 31, 2021. All work with respect to the Minimum Improvements to be
constructed or provided by the Developer on the Development Property shall be in conformity with
the Construction Plans as submitted by the Developer and approved by the Authority.
471894A MNIMN190 -115
3. Miscellaneous. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Contract shall remain in
full force and effect. Upon execution, the Developer shall reimburse the EDA for all out -of pocket -
costs incurred by the EDA in connection with negotiating, drafting and approval of this
Amendment.
(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)
4718941 MNI MN 190 -115
Dated this 9th day of December, 2015.
Masters Fifth Avenue, Inc. City of Monticello Economic Development
Authority
By: B. 3 0 .
Its Its President
By:
Its E Director
4718940 MNI MN 190-115
EDA Agenda: 04/13/16
9. Consideration of contract notice for Market Matching Services. (AS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
The EDA is asked to provide a 30 -day notice to WSB & Associates stating its intent to
terminate the current contract for Market Matching services effective May 13th, 2016.
The EDA approved a month -to -month contract extension for Market Matching in June of
2016. The contract for month -to -month services will expire in July, 2016. WSB has
indicated that 30 -day notice to end services is required.
Over the last several months, the EDA has been asked to consider a variety of marketing tools
and options, including broker services, print pieces, and other marketing partnerships. The
City /EDA will also soon have the benefit of a dedicated Economic Development Manager,
and as such, staff capabilities should become a larger part of the evaluation for marketing
workload.
Further, it was noted by the EDA that prior to additional decisions on marketing initiatives, a
more defined marketing plan is needed. In short, the EDA must understand its product,
market, message, best methods for outreach, and measurement of results.
To establish this strategic marketing plan, staff would propose that the EDA and City hold a
strategic planning meeting to establish marketing goals, initiatives and resources for the
City /EDA. The meeting will incorporate the objectives set within the EDA's 2016 Work
Plan, as well as the recent discussion of the EDA marketing sub - committee.
Over the next month, staff and WSB's Market Matching team will work to prepare for the
strategic planning meeting with EDA and City Council. WSB & Associates will also be
completing the following tasks:
1. Update of all current collateral materials (included with this packet)
2. Update of Monticello information on MNDEED
The above services are included within the $4,000 /month rate.
After the strategic planning session for marketing, the EDA will be able to more clearly
define any continuation of services with WSB & Associates for Market Matching.
Al. Budget Impact: The EDA's budget for Market Matching services in 2016 is $12,000.
Information on costs for a modified contract for services will be provided with a future
recommendation on staffing and marketing services.
A2. Staff Impact: Staff will prepare for the upcoming strategic planning meeting with
WSB support.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Motion to direct staff to send a letter to WSB & Associates terminating the current
contract for Market Matching services, effective May 13, 2016.
2. Motion of other.
EDA Agenda: 04/13/16
C. STAFF RECOMMWNDATION
At this time, staff recommends sending the letter of notice and continuing strategic marketing
discussions to determine establishment of a new scope of services with WSB & Associates.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
A. 2015 -2016 Market Matching Contract
B. Market Matching Marketing Materials, sample
2
W B
& Aawwlates. Inc. engineering • planning • environmental • construction
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel; 763 -6414800
Fax 763 -541 -1700
July 1, 2015
Mr. Jeff O'Neill
City Administrator
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Avenue, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 56069
Re: Economic Development Services for the City of Monticello
Dear Mr. O'Neill:
Thank you for providing WSB R-- Associates the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide Economic
Development Services for the City of Monticello. Provided below is a summary of the proposed Scope of
Services and Fee:
SCONE OF SERVICES:
Task 1: Deliverable Development & Data Collection
• Deliverable 1: Market Data
Revision /completion of the original contract's remaining tangible deliverables within
the first 45 days of the new contract. To include the following:
c Housing market demand analysis report
Deployment of completed market matching materials
Update site maps every two months
Deliverable 2: Data Deployment
Dedicated focus on news release and development of economic
development/business features for City communication outlets.
• WSB will coordinate press releases as needed
• WSB will ensure consistent integration of USP throughout all marketing
efforts
• WSB will provide content and copy for the City's economic development
website
• Deliverable 3: Data Management
Manage and report on SalesForce CRM Community Partner Portal
o WSB will include the CRM report at July EDA meeting.
Business Retention & Expansion
Deliverable 4: Economic Development Opportunities
WSB will identify and assist in identifying potential economic development
opportunities: including the following:
• Land Acquisition
• Financial Incentive Opportunities
Equal Opportunity Employer
wsbeng,com
F:lC. —Wty Devdopmeat D1re to Ecoo &DeMel p.,.IUkaeds\EDAlEDAAGEND\ 201 S3dy 20Mhem &Mevket MattWng12015 Er000dc
Page 2 -
Task 2: Market Engagement
• Deliverable 5: Profile of Targeted Prospects
EDA/staff discussion regarding targeted industries and potential market entrants as it
relates to City -held properties
o Coordinate EDAJCity Negotiations Team work on City -held properties to
determine sale disposition and representation; produce sale pieces; develop
and present recommended sales strategy
• Produce sales pieces
• Develop and present sales strategy
- Coordination of Tour for Prospective Leads
c WSB will coordinate tours for prospective leads as necessary.
Deliverable 6: Deliver Leads /Assist in Closing
- Act as a conduit for information and resource for market entrant and the City staff
(on- going)
o WSB will take a lead role in providing detailed development related
information to all qualified leads including:
• Assistance with financial package preparation in consultation with
City staff, policy makers, and financial consultant
• Attendance at pre - design meetings associated with Market Matching
leads.
Deliverable 7:
Active networking with potential market entrants (on- going)
• External Organization and level of participation (on- going)
• Greater MSP — WSB retains membership and acts as representative
• DEED — City retains memberships and WSB acts as representative
• EDAM — WSB retains membership and WSB acts as representative
• Central Minnesota Initiative Foundation — City retains membership and WSB
acts as representative
• Minnesota Chamber of Commerce — WSB retains membership and acts as
representative
• Broadband Properties — City retains membership and WSB acts as
representative
• Wright County Economic Development Partnership — membership by both
City and WSB and WSB acts as primary representative with City support
• Minnesota High Tech Association — WSB acts as representative
• Central Minnesota Industrial Partnership — WSB acts as representative
• Central MN Manufacturer's Association — WSB acts as representative
• Conference and Association Trade Shows — TBD
• Sensible Land Use Coalition — WSB acts as representative
• League of Minnesota Cities — WSB acts as representative
• NAIOP — WSB acts as representative
• CoreNet Global — WSB acts as representative
• Urban Land Use Institute — WSB acts as representative
Maintain current understanding of existing Grant programs for potential use in
conjunction with Market Matching efforts.
o Monthly report to staff on opportunities and corresponding project fit
Task 3: Project Management
Deliverable 8:
Provide consistent and effective communication with City Staff, EDA, and City
Council. (see communications plan)
o WSB will provide Weekly Email Updates to City Staff
o WSB will attend Bi- Weekly Staff Update Meetings
o WSB will provide Written Monthly Memo to City Staff of Market Matching
efforts, including ED e- newsletter
P;Ifvmmnnily Dwdcgnnail Du'(durE.L ,ie Deer]rgment\Be dFlEDA \EDAAGENDN2015UJWy2015VJim&Muka MaldringM15 Economic Dedt
Page 3 -
o WSB will provide Monthly Presentation to the EDA meetings on a monthly
basis.
o WSB will prepare website information
o WSB will deploy the City Economic Development Flyer
o WSB will prepare Property Site Flyers on an as needed basis
o WSB will coordinate with the Chamber of Commerce in conjunction with
Market Matching efforts and property map updates.
FEE FOR SERVICES
As outlined in the Economic Development Services contract, the City has the option to retain WSB &
Associates on a month to month basis for an additional 12 months at the fee of $4,000 per month, starting
July 1, 2015.
Travel expenses incurred by WSB within the State of MN as part of the Economic Development Services
offering are still included in the monthly fee stated above. Travel expenses incurred by WSB for travel
outside of the State of MN that is directed by the City of Monticello shall be paid for according to a
negotiated price.
Additionally, fees for services outside of the above described scope that may be required from time to
time shall be completed at an additional hourly rate. Types of services could include the following:
Grant/Funding Support
FiberNet Monticello Marketing Support
Website Management
The above described services will be provided in accordance with WSB's in -place Professional Services
Agreement. If you are in agreement with the proposed project Scope of Services and FEE, please sign
below and return one copy to our office.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the above information, please contact either one of us
at {763} 541 -4800.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates
John Uphoff Brian J. Bourassa, PE
Economic Development Specialist Principal
Approval Signature
By:
Title: e L4Y Muni h ii 6' y-ot v rJ Exec ti r .
Date: *7- 1 `T - ids
FAConunu my Dwdoluuml Divaa Pmnomk DevdopmwABwdi EDA%DAAGEND120 Maly 20 Mi m B.Markd Muldnng=] 5 Economic DwOc
CITY OF
IiN Monticello
o� r, Cpl, -t"
WELCOMES
��
Destination for Innoyti�
0
TMon
Community Snapshot
Destination for Innovation
1 of the Few Cities in U.S.
1217 5 9 fififf
With Multiple Fiber O tic Providers 32 years
to Home and Business Monticello !!!!!'
Population Median Age
------------------------------- - - - - -; ---------------------------- ------------------------------------- ----------------------------
$192,500
10,370 A 29 City Parks
4,693 Households Median Home Value Acres of Regional Parkland
$69,647 17
Median Household Miles of Tra'ii
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online ; Income Mississippi River Access
Taxes: The Cost of Doing Business in...
*Based on 1 Million Dollar Industrial Property Valuation
$40,000 000 00000
$39,000
$38,000
$37,000
$36,000
$35,000
$34,000
$33,000
$32,000
$31,000
$30,000
How to Get Here
S %.
Air: Located 51 miles north west of the
Minneapolis /St. Paul International Airport or
23 miles from the St. Cloud Regional Airport.
Passenger Rail /Light Rail: Connected to the
North Star passenger rail line that runs to
the Twin Cities and connecting LRT lines.
=� Interstate /Highway: Monticello is located
-ETA off of Interstate Highway 94 and Highway
25, and 2 miles from Highway 10.
Rail: The BNSF rail line is a class 1 freight
railroad that connects north to St. Cloud and
South to the Twin Cities.
Education
■ Associates degree
Some College
■ High school graduate
■ Bachelor's degree
Post graduate degree
2040
Source: American Community Survey (2007 -2011)
Population Growth Projections for
Wright County
Total Population
Percent Change
2010
2020
2030
2040
2010 -2020
2010 -2040
124,700
147,422
171,416
193,679
18.2%
55.3%
Wright County had the fastest growing labor force in Minnesota from
2002 to 2012 at +22.6 %. Neighboring Sherburne County was the 4th
fastest labor force growth at + 18.5%
Source: Positively Minnesota
To St. Cloud - 30 Miles
To Minneapolis - 38 Miles
Destination for Innovation
Wright County
Employment Profile
Percent of
Population
Employed
Civilian Employed Population (16+ yrs)
64,309
employed
Construction
19%
Manufacturing
17%
Wholesale Trade
13%
Retail Trade
9.2%
Transportation Warehousing
9%
Information
7.6 %
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate
6%
Professional, Scientific, Management
4.5 %
Educational Services, Health Care, Social Services
4.4%
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation
4%
Public Administration
1.5 %
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, Mining
1.4%
Other
1.5%
Source: American Community Survey
(2007-20115 yr Estimates)
vie
( -4 CITY OF
�.� Monticello
Certified Shovel R
Development Site
Monticello Destination for Innovation
,�j
Assistance may include:
• Acquisition of land
• Preparation of sites for development
• Construction or reconstruction of public improvements
• Removal of polluted lands as needed
• Tax increment financing, tax abatement, or other financial
tools available to the city
• Fiber subsidy available
• Site preparation (platting)
• Revolving loan
Mims
r I'
11 �Mr.
Helpful Links:
Local Assistance Programs
Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
Assistance for land write -down and or site improvements for
qualified businesses.
Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund
Below Prime Interest Rate Loan.
Regional Assistance Programs
Wright County Enterprise Fund
A county funding course to assist industrial businesses with
financing real property acquisition and development,
machinery and equipment or working capital.
Minnesota Investment Fund
Low interest loans to industrial, manufacturing and
technology businesses.
Small Business Development Loan Program
This loan is through the Minnesota Agricultural and
Economic Development Board who issues industrial
development bonds.
Small Business Administration (SBA)
Assistance with SBA loans.
Building Business in Monticello -
http: / /www. buildingbusinessinmonticello. com
Greater MSP-
http: / /www.youtube.com /watch ?feature= player embedded &v= JDH5il6FFiM
The City of Monticello's Economic Development Authority provides comprehensive
services to prospective and existing businesses by assisting with site and building
information, financial assistance, and guidance through the regulatory and development
process.
1111 ��
monticello
Data Note: Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. Census 2000 medians are computed from reported data distributions. The "1990 -2000 Annual Rate" is an annual compund rate.
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2000 Census Population and Housing.
Page 1 of 5
1990
Census 2000
1990 -2000
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Annual Rate
Total Population
5,137
-
7,868
-
4.36%
Total Households
1,858
100.0%
2,944
100.0%
4.71%
Average Household Size
2.72
-
2.64
-
-0.30%
Total Families
1,419
76.4%
2,066
70.2%
3.83%
Average Family Size
3.14
-
3.13
-
-0.03%
Per Capita Income
$12,189
-
$19,229
-
4.66%
Total Housing Units
1,990
-
3,030
-
4.29%
Population by Sex
Male
2,487
48.4%
3,793
48.2%
4.31%
Female
2,649
51.6%
4,075
51.8%
4.40%
Population by Age
Total
5,136
100.0%
7,868
100.0%
4.36%
Age 0 - 4
521
10.1%
799
10.2%
4.37%
Age 5- 9
525
10.2%
725
9.2%
3.28%
Age 10- 14
458
8.9%
610
7.8%
2.91%
Age 15 - 19
399
7.8%
511
6.5%
2.50%
Age 20 - 24
392
7.6%
547
7.0%
3.39%
Age 25 - 29
527
10.3%
779
9.9%
3.99%
Age 30 - 34
452
8.8%
792
10.1%
5.77%
Age 35 - 39
390
7.6%
694
8.8%
5.93%
Age 40 - 44
319
6.2%
521
6.6%
5.03%
Age 45 - 49
273
5.3%
411
5.2%
4.18%
Age 50 - 54
172
3.3%
308
3.9%
6.00%
Age 55 - 59
142
2.8%
271
3.4%
6.68%
Age 60 - 64
121
2.4%
202
2.6%
5.26%
Age 65 - 69
112
2.2%
176
2.2%
4.62%
Age 70 - 74
107
2.1%
140
1.8%
2.72%
Age 75 - 79
100
1.9%
155
2.0%
4.48%
Age 80 - 84
59
1.1%
105
1.3%
5.93%
Age 85+
67
1.3%
122
1.6%
6.18%
Median Age
27.6
29.8
0.77%
Age 18+
3,374
65.7%
5,394
68.6%
4.80%
Age 65+
445
8.7%
698
8.9%
4.60%
Households by Household Income
Household Income Base
1,865
100.0%
2,977
100.0%
4.79%
< $15,000
438
23.5%
283
9.5%
-4.27%
$15,000 - $24,999
252
13.5%
317
10.6%
2.32%
$25,000 - $34,999
350
18.8%
449
15.1%
2.52%
$35,000 - $49,999
437
23.4%
592
19.9%
3.08%
$50,000 - $74,999
280
15.0%
739
24.8%
10.19%
$75,000 - $99,999
73
3.9%
382
12.8%
18.00%
$100,000 - $149,999
20
1.1%
195
6.6%
25.57%
$150,000+
15
0.8%
20
0.7%
2.92%
Median Household Income
$31,908
$45,465
3.60%
Average Household Income
$35,385
$50,889
3.70%
Data Note: Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. Census 2000 medians are computed from reported data distributions. The "1990 -2000 Annual Rate" is an annual compund rate.
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2000 Census Population and Housing.
Page 1 of 5
1111 ��
monticello
Households by Poverty Status and Household
Total
1990
100.0%
Census 2000
100.0%
1990 -2000
Families by Family Income
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Annual Rate
Family Income Base
1,447
100.0%
2,122
100.0%
3.90%
< $15,000
236
16.3%
104
4.9%
-7.87%
$15,000 - $24,999
210
14.5%
187
8.8%
-1.15%
$25,000 - $34,999
282
19.5%
299
14.1%
0.59%
$35,000 - $49,999
353
24.4%
356
16.8%
0.08%
$50,000 - $74,999
258
17.8%
635
29.9%
9.42%
$75,000 - $99,999
73
5.0%
353
16.6%
17.07%
$100,000 - $149,999
20
1.4%
168
7.9%
23.72%
$150,000+
15
1.0%
20
0.9%
2.92%
Median Family Income
$34,844
$53,315
4.35%
Average Family Income
$38,444
$57,009
4.02%
Households by Poverty Status and Household
Total
1,865
100.0%
2,977
100.0%
4.79%
Below Poverty Level
175
9.4%
154
5.2%
-1.27%
Married - Couple Family
39
2.1%
46
1.5%
1.66%
Other Family - Male householder, No Wife
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0.00%
Other Family - Female householder, No Husband
83
4.5%
43
1.4%
-6.36%
Nonfamily Households
53
2.8%
65
2.2%
2.06%
At or Above Poverty Level
1,690
90.6%
2,823
94.8%
5.26%
Married - Couple Family
1,132
60.7%
1,584
53.2%
3.42%
Other Family - Male householder, No Wife
49
2.6%
164
5.5%
12.84%
Other Family - Female householder, No Husband
117
6.3%
285
9.6%
9.31%
Nonfamily Households
392
21.0%
790
26.5%
7.26%
Households by Type
Total
1,858
100.0%
2,944
100.0%
4.71%
Family Households
1,419
76.4%
2,066
70.2%
3.83%
Married - couple Families
1,138
61.2%
1,550
52.6%
3.14%
With Related Children
702
37.8%
883
30.0%
2.32%
Other Family (No Spouse Present)
281
15.1%
516
17.5%
6.27%
With Related Children
225
12.1%
420
14.3%
6.44%
Nonfamily Households
438
23.6%
878
29.8%
7.20%
Householder Living Alone
346
18.6%
698
23.7%
7.27%
Householder not Living Alone
92
5.0%
180
6.1%
6.94%
Households with Related Children
927
49.9%
1,303
44.3%
3.46%
Households by Vehicles Available
Total
1,859
100%
2,927
100%
4.64%
None
87
4.7%
172
5.9%
7.05%
1
566
30.4%
902
30.8%
4.77%
2
791
42.5%
1,430
48.9%
6.10%
3
246
13.2%
338
11.5%
3.23%
4
115
6.2%
85
2.9%
-2.98%
5+
54
2.9%
0
0.0%
- 100.00%
Average Number of Vehicles Available
2.0
1.7
-1.61%
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2000 Census Population and Housing.
Page 2 of 5
1111 ��
Monticello
Housing Units by Units in Structure
Total
1990
100.0%
Census 2000
100.0%
1990 -2000
Housing Units by Occupancy
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Annual Rate
Total
1,992
100.0%
3,030
100.0%
4.28%
Occupied Housing Units
1,858
93.3%
2,944
97.2%
4.71%
Owner Occupied Housing Units
1,264
63.5%
2,122
70.0%
5.32%
Renter Occupied Housing Units
594
29.8%
822
27.1%
3.30%
Vacant Housing Units
134
6.7%
86
2.8%
-4.34%
For Rent
77
3.9%
24
0.8%
- 11.00%
For Sale Only
19
1.0%
30
1.0%
4.67%
Rented or Sold, Not Occupied
18
0.9%
8
0.3%
-7.79%
For Seasonal /Recreational /Occasional Use
5
0.3%
10
0.3%
7.18%
For Migrant Workers
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0.00%
Other Vacant
15
0.8%
14
0.5%
-0.69%
Housing Units by Units in Structure
Total
1,989
100.0%
3,005
100.0%
4.21%
1, Detached
1,050
52.8%
1,771
58.9%
5.37%
1, Attached
110
5.5%
347
11.5%
12.17%
2
44
2.2%
33
1.1%
-2.84%
3 or 4
60
3.0%
112
3.7%
6.44%
5 to 9
74
3.7%
53
1.8%
-3.28%
10 to 19
141
7.1%
185
6.2%
2.75%
20+
218
11.0%
294
9.8%
3.04%
Mobile Home
275
13.8%
210
7.0%
-2.66%
Other
17
0.9%
0
0.0%
- 100.00%
Specified Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value
Total
918
100.0%
1,810
100.0%
7.02%
< $50,000
52
5.7%
6
0.3%
- 19.42%
$50,000 - $99,999
728
79.3%
262
14.5%
-9.71%
$100,000 - $149,999
119
13.0%
1,026
56.7%
24.04%
$150,000 - $199,999
17
1.9%
370
20.4%
36.07%
$200,000 - $299,999
2
0.2%
121
6.7%
50.72%
$300,000 - $499,999
0
0.0%
16
0.9%
0.00%
$500,000 +
0
0.0%
9
0.5%
0.00%
Median Home Value
$79,047
$130,234
5.12%
Average Home Value
$82,194
$143,265
5.71%
Specified Renter Occupied Housing Units by Rent
Total
581
100.0%
821
100.0%
3.52%
With Cash Rent
566
97.4%
802
97.7%
3.55%
< $200
92
15.8%
83
10.1%
-1.02%
$200 -$499
441
75.9%
240
29.2%
-5.90%
$500 -$749
33
5.7%
441
53.7%
29.60%
$750 -$999
0
0.0%
14
1.7%
0.00%
$1000 +
0
0.0%
24
2.9%
0.00%
No Cash Rent
15
2.6%
19
2.3%
2.39%
Median Rent
$386
$527
3.16%
Average Rent
$352
$502
3.61%
Data Note: Specified owner occupied Housing Units include only single family units on less than 10 acres, with no business or medical office on site. Specified renter occupied HUs exclude
single family units on 10+ acres. Average Rent excludes units paying no cash rent. Rent, Home Value and Units in Structure data are complete counts in 1990 and sample counts in 2000, so
changes in enumeration can affect comparability.
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2000 Census Population and Housing.
Page 3 of 5
1111 ��
Monticello
Workers 16+ by Place of Work
Total
1990
100.0%
Census 2000
100.0%
1990 -2000
Population 16+ by Employment Status
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Annual Rate
Total
3,600
100.0%
5,727
100.0%
4.75%
In Labor Force
2,631
73.1%
4,498
78.5%
5.51%
Civilian Employed
2,498
69.4%
4,359
76.1%
5.73%
Civilian Unemployed
133
3.7%
139
2.4%
0.44%
In Armed Forces
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0.00%
Not in Labor Force
969
26.9%
1,229
21.5%
2.41%
Workers 16+ by Place of Work
Total
2,414
100.0%
4,262
100.0%
5.85%
Worked in State of Residence
2,401
99.5%
4,262
100.0%
5.91%
Worked in County of Residence
1,275
52.8%
1,944
45.6%
4.31%
Worked outside County of Residence
1,126
46.6%
2,318
54.4%
7.49%
Worked outside State of Residence
13
0.5%
0
0.0%
- 100.00%
Workers 16+ by Transportation to Work
137
5.7%
287
6.7%
7.68%
Total
2,414
100.0%
4,262
100.0%
5.85%
Drove Alone - Car, Truck or Van
1,961
81.2%
3,521
82.6%
6.03%
Carpooled - Car, Truck or Van
313
13.0%
524
12.3%
5.29%
Public Transportation
13
0.5%
13
0.3%
0.00%
Walked
78
3.2%
48
1.1%
-4.74%
Other Means
20
0.8%
28
0.7%
3.42%
Worked at Home
29
1.2%
128
3.0%
16.01%
Workers 16+ by Travel Time to Work
Total
2,413
100.0%
4,262
100.0%
5.85%
Did not Work at Home
2,384
98.8%
4,134
97.0%
5.66%
Less than 5 minutes
149
6.2%
238
5.6%
4.79%
5 to 9 minutes
536
22.2%
656
15.4%
2.04%
10 to 19 minutes
521
21.6%
907
21.3%
5.70%
20 to 24 minutes
137
5.7%
287
6.7%
7.68%
25 to 34 minutes
338
14.0%
620
14.5%
6.25%
35 to 44 minutes
287
11.9%
512
12.0%
5.96%
45 to 59 minutes
271
11.2%
653
15.3%
9.19%
60 to 89 minutes
102
4.2%
192
4.5%
6.53%
90 or more minutes
43
1.8%
69
1.6%
4.84%
Worked at Home
29
1.2%
128
3.0%
16.01%
Average Travel Time to Work (in minutes)
23.6
0.9%
26.0
0.5%
0.97%
Population 15+ by Sex and Marital Status
Total
3,631
100.0%
5,776
100.0%
4.75%
Females
1,905
52.5%
3,027
52.4%
4.74%
Never Married
429
11.8%
615
10.6%
3.67%
Married, not Separated
1,086
29.9%
1,693
29.3%
4.54%
Married, Separated
37
1.0%
59
1.0%
4.78%
Widowed
181
5.0%
312
5.4%
5.60%
Divorced
172
4.7%
348
6.0%
7.30%
Males
1,726
47.5%
2,749
47.6%
4.76%
Never Married
448
12.3%
764
13.2%
5.48%
Married, not Separated
1,102
30.3%
1,680
29.1%
4.31%
Married, Separated
19
0.5%
42
0.7%
8.26%
Widowed
33
0.9%
27
0.5%
-1.99%
Divorced
124
3.4%
236
4.1%
6.65%
Data Note: Marital status data are complete counts in 1990 and sample counts in 2000, so changes in enumeration
can affect comparability.
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2000 Census Population and Housing.
Page 4 of 5
1111 ��
Monticello
Diversity Index 6.2 9.7 4.58%
Hispanic Population by Race
Total
1990
100.0%
Census 2000
100.0%
1990 -2000
Population by Race
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Annual Rate
Total
5,137
100.0%
7,868
100.0%
4.36%
White Alone
5,008
97.5%
7,629
97.0%
4.30%
Black or African American Alone
13
0.3%
26
0.3%
7.18%
American Indian or Alaskan Native Alone
14
0.3%
16
0.2%
1.34%
Asian Alone
26
0.5%
43
0.5%
5.16%
Pacific Islander Alone
0
0.0%
1
0.0%
0.00%
Some Other Race Alone
11
0.2%
50
0.6%
16.35%
Two or More Races
64
1.2%
103
1.3%
4.87%
Diversity Index 6.2 9.7 4.58%
Hispanic Population by Race
Total
34
100.0%
160
100.0%
16.75%
White Alone
25
73.5%
94
58.8%
14.16%
Black or African American Alone
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0.00%
American Indian or Alaskan Native Alone
0
0.0%
1
0.6%
0.00%
Asian or Pacific Islander Alone
1
2.9%
2
1.3%
7.18%
Some Other Race Alone
8
23.5%
47
29.4%
19.37%
Two or More Races
0
0.0%
16
10.0%
0.00%
Population 3+ by School Enrollment
Total
4,905
100.0%
7,497
100.0%
4.33%
Enrolled in Public Preschool /Kindergarten
141
2.9%
310
4.1%
8.20%
Enrolled in Private Preschool /Kindergarten
33
0.7%
23
0.3%
-3.55%
Enrolled in Public Elementary /High School
1,136
23.2%
1,506
20.1%
2.86%
Enrolled in Private Elementary /High School
39
0.8%
37
0.5%
-0.53%
Enrolled in Public College
179
3.6%
206
2.7%
1.41%
Enrolled in Private College
51
1.0%
20
0.3%
-8.94%
Not Enrolled in School
3,326
67.8%
5,395
72.0%
4.96%
Population 25+ by Educational Attainment
Total
2,894
100.0%
4,771
100.0%
5.13%
Less than 9th Grade
237
8.2%
222
4.7%
-0.65%
9th to 12th Grade, No Diploma
303
10.5%
534
11.2%
5.83%
High School Graduate
1,243
43.0%
1,381
28.9%
1.06%
Some College, No Degree
442
15.3%
1,124
23.6%
9.78%
Associate Degree
196
6.8%
498
10.4%
9.77%
Bachelor's Degree
350
12.1%
746
15.6%
7.86%
Master's /Professional /Doctorate Degree
123
4.3%
266
5.6%
8.02%
Data Note: The 1990 Census reported population by single races only. Esri estimates the multiracial population from 1990 Census data for the total population. In the 1990 Census, "Asian"
and "Pacific Islander" were not reported separately for the Hispanic Origin population. To compare the data, "Asian" and "Pacific Islander" are combined in 2000. The Diversity Index
summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that 2 persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups.
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2000 Census Population and Housing.
Page 5 of 5
CITY ( )I
Monticello Destination for Innovation
Updated: 8/2015
I f n
' Legend
> f Public Parking Facilities
f Privatey Owned Parcels - Guided Downtown
' > EDA Owned Properties - Guided Downtown
City Owned Properties - Guided Downtown
PID
Owner
Size (Acres)
2013 Taxes
Zoning
1. 155- 010 - 017011
City of Monticello
0.47
$0.00
B -3
2. 155- 010 - 050011
Monticello EDA
0.19
$0.00
B -3
3, 155- 010 - 054011
Monticello EDA
0.25
$0.00
B -3
4. 155- 010 - 052071
Monticello EDA
0.22
$0.00
B -3
5. 155- 010 - 035061
Monticello EDA
0.06
$0.00
B -3
6. 155- 010 - 034130
Monticello EDA
0.36
$0.00
B -3
7. 155- 010 - 034020
City of Monticello
1.34
$0.00
B -3
8. 155- 010 - 067010
Monticello EDA
1.11
$0.00
B -3
9. 155- 010 - 036030
BBE Properties
0.76
$2,814.00
B -3
Public Parking Facilities
PID
Owner
Size (Acres)
2013 Taxes
Zoning
10. 155- 010 - 052140
City of Monticello
0.18
$0.00
B -3
11. 155-010-052132
City of Monticello
0.10
$0.00
B-3
12. 155-010-035011
City of Monticello
0.70
$0.00
B -3
13. 155-010-035011
City of Monticello
0.70
$0.00
B -3
j Monticello Destination for Innovation
ti
Updated 8/2015
PID
Owner
Size (Acres)
2013 Taxes
Zoning
1.
155-171-000030
_ J X Bowers LLC
19.09
$841.00
B-4
2.
155-171-000040
John Chadwick Farms LLC
19.09
$878.00
B-4
3.
155-125-000040
Ocello LLC
11.85
$6,452.00
B-3
4.
155-125-004110
Wells Fargo Bank NA
6.28
$6,042.00
B-3
5.
155-125-000070
Ocello LLC
12.96
$7,055.00
B-3
6.
155-500-142210
City of Monticello
4.11
$0.00
B-3
7.
155-151-003010
Bradley & Sharon Larson
1.78
$2,950.00_
B-4
8.
155-157-001010
Chana Properties Family LP
1.55
$6,368.00
B-4
9.
155-157-001020
Arma Property LLC
1.67
$9,424.00
B-4
10.
155-171-001021
4134 Deegan Avenue NE LLC
1.16
$6,304.00
B-4
11.
155-174-001010
Ohana Properties Family LP
0.90
$4,482.00
B-4
12.
155-151-004010
Ohana Properties Family LP
0.57
$2,476.00
B-4
1
13.
155-193-001020
Highland Bank
7.02
$7,984.00_
B-4
1
4'
14.
155-164-000030
City of Monticello
7.20
$0.00
B-4
15.
155-164-000050
City of Monticello
2.14
$0.00
B-4
' 2
\
» 3''
16.
155-164-000040
City of Monticello
6.14
$0.00
B-4
'� •�
3=
17.
155-176-002011
City of Monticello
1.29
$0.00
B-4
37
3 +2.
18.
155-176-001020
City of Monticello
2.70
$0.00
B-4
r' 38•
'. 3. 31.
19.
155-164-000020
_
City of Monticello
2.83
$0.00
B-4
3.
3
20.
155-210-001010
Klembank
1.80
$6,160.00
B-3
4.
21.
155-221-000010
Quad Development LLC
3.80
$6,474.00
B-4
39.
29
22.
155-227-000010
Ocello LLC
43.15
$0.00
B-4
5.
40..E 46.
23.
155-500-142400
John & Mary Lundsten
38.87
$1,628.00
B-3
_
28 "TM` = " 42.
43.
24.
155-213-001010
Glen & Lois Posusta
1.79
$9,800.00
B-3
6.
27
25.
155-500-142303
City of Monticello
3.07
$0.00
B-3
26.
155-500-142300
City of Monticello
3.20
$0.00
B-3
25.
27.
155-500-142104
Premier Bank Minnesota
18.31
$29,934.00
B-4
28.
155-018-001020
City of Monticello
5.11
$0.00
B-2
29.
155- 037- 001010
Kean of Monticello, Inc
1.92
$4,938.00
B -2
13
49
30.
155-050-000020
Joseph Lofromboise Trust
3.13
$3,340.00
IBC
15 14. 1 22.
31.
155-029-002130
G &E Properties LLC
4.18
$5,302.00
IBC
32.
155-029-002120
G &E Properties LLC
2.03
$2,940.00
IBC
17 19'
33.
155-029-002110
G &E Properties LLC
2.11
$3,054.00
IBC
21.
+_
34.
155-029-002100
ernes LL„
G &E Prop, C
2.20
$3,186.00
IBC
35.
155-029-002090
G &E Properties LLC
2.28
$3,300.00
I,BC
36.
155-029-002050
Kenneth Maus
5.40
$3,230.00
IBC
37.
155-068-001010
Riverwood Bank
19.35
$30,286.00
B-3
38.
155-185-001010
State of Minnesota
1.58
$0.00
B-3
39.
155-202-001060
IRET Properties
0.51
$0.00
B-3
�d
40.
155-079-001010
Jyoti R Patel
0.79
$0.00
B-3
°
41.
155- 011 - 000171
Monticello Industrial Park
40.83
$0.00
B2 /IBC
42.
155-212-001010
Ryan Companies US INC
1.54
$0.00
B-4
Legend
43.
155-212-001030
Kean of Monticello, Inc
1.09
$0.00
B-4
44.
155-178-002030
Ryan Companies US INC
1.27
$0.00
B-4
Privately Owned Properties - Guided Commercial
45.
155-205-001020
Ryan Companies US INC
1.87
$0.00
B-4
City Owned Properties - Guided Commercial
46.
155-117-002010
MMC Land Company LLC
5.04
$0.00
B-4
_,, k
47.
155-117-001030
MMC Land Company LLC _
2.24
$0.00
B-4
48.
155-086-000010
SPO LLC
0.95
$0.00
B-2
49.
155-196-000020
Monticello Industrial Park, Inc
1.43
$263.00
R PUD
j Monticello Destination for Innovation
Updated: 8/2015
Legend
Privately Owned Properties - Guided Industrial
- City Owned Properties - Guided Industrial
PID
Owner
Size (Acres)
2013 Taxes
Zoning
1. 155- 194 - 000 -010
City of Monticello
10.87
$0.00
I -1
2. 155- 191 - 000020
City of Monticello
1.83
$0.00
I -1
3. 155- 223 - 000010
City of Monticello
5.28
$0.00
I -1
4. 155- 194 - 000010
City of Monticello
4.99
$0.00
I -1
5. 155- 194 - 000020
City of Monticello
6.67
$0.00
I -1
6. 155- 171- 000050
City of Monticello
16.1 Dev
$0.00
I -1
7• 155- 194 - 000040
City of Monticello
5.01
$0.00
I -1
8• 155 -185- 000010
City of Monticello
2.32
$0.00
I -1
9. 155- 171- 000060
City of Monticello
13.67
$0.00
A -0
10. 155- 018 - 003020
Kenneth & Teresa Spaeth
4.39
$4,452.00
I -2
11. 155- 143 - 001020
Monticello Industrial Park Inc
7.25
$4,164.00
IBC
12. 155- 038 - 001060
Schultz & Schupp LLC
1.18
$3,302.00
I -1
EDA Agenda: 04/13/16
10. Consideration of Director's Report (JO /AS)
Economic Development Manager Position
Mr. Jim Thares has been offered and has accepted the position of Monticello Economic
Development Manager. Mr. Thares has a significant amount of experience in economic
development and will bring a great deal of knowledge and expertise to the position. He will
begin with the City on April 20a', 2016.
Landmark Square II — Planning Commission Update
On April 5t', 2016 the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the
Development Stage Planned Unit Development application submitted by Masters 5t' Avenue.
The item will go forward to the City Council for consideration on April 25t', 2016.
FNM Management Services
Arvig and CTC have submitted proposals for FNM management services. The two firms have
each met with a City sub - committee including Council members Glen Posusta and Lloyd
Hilgart as well as City Administrator Jeff O'Neill and Finance Director Wayne Oberg
regarding their initial proposals. These proposals are now being refined for presentation to
the full City Council for consideration.
IEDC Action Statement
The IEDC has adopted their 2016 action statement, which is attached for EDA's reference.
1
INDUSTRIAL & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
2016 ACTION STATEMENT WORKSHEET
Mission Statement: The Monticello IEDC will advocate industrial and economic growth within
the City of Monticello by promoting awareness and communication efforts on behalf of the
business community.
Goal:
The IEDC is dedicated to being pro- active in following the objectives and policies established in
the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. It is the intention of the IEDC to work within the areas
identified below as supporting objectives and actions.
Objective: Retaining Jobs
1. Encourage business retention within Monticello.
a. Business retention visits by IEDC members to long standing business in the
community to help grow stronger relationships between our businesses and City
Hall.
b. Discuss the needs of businesses for development of a Retention Action Plan.
c. Market and present various programs available via the city and EDA.
2. Recognize the contributions of Monticello manufacturers through organization of
and participation in industry - related events.
a. Continue Industry of the Year Breakfast.
b. Assist in development and promotion of a tour of Monticello Industrial
Businesses.
c. Focus on Manufacturing week 2016 and tour.
3. Enhance Workforce Development through partnerships with local educators,
businesses, organizations and agencies.
a. Stronger participation with the Monticello School District in growing their
initiative to bring businesses into the classrooms.
b. Based on the need of the businesses, partner with key leaders of our local businesses,
educators and others to develop and execute a Workforce Development Plan.
c. Explore ways business can bring relevance to educational classes & programs.
4. Promote communications & engagement with Monticello businesses and prospects
a. Create and host a Monticello business round table event which will offer businesses
a platform for discussion.
b. Facilitate "Industrial Round Tables ".
Objective: Creating Jobs & Expanding the Tax Base
1. Support the recruitment of business which further the goals and objectives for the
community as guided by the Comprehensive Plan.
a. Assess the current marketing materials and plan.
b. Assist in execution or development of a new Marketing Plan.
c. Respond in a timely manner to inbound communications.
2. Continue to lead the City in moving forward key transportation projects which
support economic development.
a. Participate in the Transportation Day through the Minnesota Chamber and lobby
on behalf of the Monticello community to help city staff bring attention to our
local transportation needs.
b. Develop a needs based transportation priority statement for lobbying/support
purposes.
c. Encourage key transportation projects which improve product delivery for
businesses, such as interchange, freeway, and bridge crossing projects.
d. Identify specific benefits of a 3rd interchange to businesses and/or community.
3. Evaluate and provide recommendations to the City regarding industrial land supply
and availability.
a. More frequently evaluate current property inventory and uses for these properties
as a group with the objective to better market these properties.
b. Assess Industrial Land availability for jobs with income levels to support families;
1. Total acreage with developed infrastructure, zoned, and available to purchase
and the maximum acreage of a contiguous, buildable lot.
2. Total acreage with undeveloped infrastructure, zoned, and available to purchase.
Owner contact information.
3. Total acreage preserved in Land Use Plan for future development.
c. Assess accessibility to Interstate 94 and State Highway 25 and utility capabilities
4. Support community quality of life initiatives which enhance Monticello's objectives
for high quality development across the land use spectrum, including residential,
commercial, industrial and civic uses.
a. Support and encourage the development of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional
Park and recommend the development of a pathway connection to Monticello
Businesses.
b. Promote CentraCare Health Monticello to industrial businesses.
c. Develop a visioning worksheet to get IEDC members views on residential,
commercial and industrial needs and challenges to bring to light needed future
planning and ordinance changes.
d. Identify needed priorities such as hotels and restaurants.
e. Review and coordinate public and private actions with parks and trails.
5. Continue to provide recommendations in an advisory capacity on land use matters
relating to industrial and economic development.
a. Provide comments on the NW Monticello Interchange Land Use Study.
b. Keep informed on the status of the Monticello Nuclear Plant as it relates to the NW
Interchange Land Use Study.
c. Think outside the box on current plan.
d. Sponsor networking individually and in small groups for input.
6. Facilitate regional development initiatives.
CITY OF
L Monticello
FRED'S AUTO BODY
349 BROADWAY WEST I MONTICELLO, MN 55362
FEBRUARY 12, 2016
Prepared for
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street I Monticello, MN 55109
WSB PROJECT NO. 02596 -170
A
WCB
Limited Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection
Fred's Auto Body
349 Broadway West
Monticello, MN 55362
Prepared for:
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Prepared by:
WSB & Associates, Inc.
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55362
February 12, 2016
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .............................................................................................. ............................... 1
2. Inspection .................................................................................................. ............................... 1
2.1 Overview ........................................................................................................ ..............................1
2.2 Asbestos Sampling and Results ............................................................. ..............................1
2.3 Lead -Based Paint Sampling and Results .......................................... ............................... 2
2.4 Regulated Materials Assessment ......................................................... ............................... 3
3. Methodology ............................................................................................. ............................... 3
3.1 Asbestos Sampling and Analysis ......................................................... ............................... 3
3.2 Lead -Based Paint Sampling and Analysis ......................................... ..............................4
4. Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................... ............................... 4
4.1 Asbestos Concerns ..................................................................................... ..............................4
4.2 Other Concerns ............................................................................................ ..............................5
4.3 Future Considerations .............................................................................. ..............................6
5. Standard Care and Qualifications ......................................................... ............................... 6
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 - Property Aerial
Figure 2 - Asbestos Sample Locations
Figure 3 - Lead -Based Paint Sample Locations
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1- Asbestos Sample Results
Table 2 - Lead -Based Paint Sample Results
Table 3 - Regulated Materials Inventory
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A - Asbestos Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix B - Lead -Based Paint Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix C - Certifications
1. Introduction
WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) was retained by the City of Monticello (the City) to
conduct a limited asbestos and regulated materials inspection for Fred's Auto Body,
a former auto repair shop located at 349 Broadway West in Monticello, Minnesota
(the Property). The City recently acquired the building and plans to resell the facility
for commercial reuse or development. No mechanical plans, as -built drawings or
other construction related documents were available for review by WSB as part of
this inspection.
This inspection was completed to identify asbestos containing materials (ACM) and
hazardous and /or regulated materials. Due to the buildings status, WSB used non-
destructive sampling techniques to identify suspect building materials. Additional
sampling may be necessary to identify materials located inside wall cavities, under
floors, above ceilings or in other areas where destructive techniques are required to
visually assess construction materials. Further, WSB did not assess below grade
materials, which may include water - proofing materials, utilities, and service lines or
fill materials. Any materials not identified in this report should be assumed to
contain asbestos unless proven otherwise by sampling.
2. Inspection
2.1 Overview
The Property consists of a vacant one - story, slab -on -grade former auto body repair
shop. The building is constructed of concrete block, contains a rolled asphalt shingle
roof, and is heated by both baseboard and hanging radiant heaters. The building was
not occupied at the time of the inspection. A Property location map is included as
Figure 1.
On February 9, 2015, WSB inspected the building for ACM, lead -based paint (LBP),
and other regulated materials. WSB was provided full access to the building with
the exception of a sub -grade catch -basin that was not accessible.
2.2 Asbestos Sampling and Results
Per current state and federal regulations, an asbestos - containing material (ACM) is
defined as any material containing greater than one percent asbestos by volume.
The inspection identified 18 homogeneous materials at the Property. A total of 22
samples were collected during the inspection and analyzed for asbestos content.
The following materials were identified as ACM:
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
Page 1
• Interior 12 "x12" tan floor tile. The material is category I non - friable and in
good condition (Sample 7).
• Exterior gray putty. The material is category I non - friable and in good
condition (Sample 19).
• Exterior black and silver roof tar. The material is category I non - friable and
in good condition (Sample 22).
Asbestos sample locations are depicted on Figure 2. Sample results and estimated
material quantities are summarized in Table 1, and laboratory analytical results are
included as Appendix A.
2.3 Lead -Based Paint Sampling and Results
A limited assessment was conducted to determine lead content for predominant
painted and coated surfaces at the Property. Untested, painted concrete from
structures built before 1978 may not be used as fill or recycled for use as aggregate
without a case - specific beneficial use determination from the MPCA.
The scope for this project was not to sample all paint types at the facility or to
satisfy Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) assessment
requirements or Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines.
Based on current regulatory definitions, LBP is defined as paint, shellac, or other
coating containing lead concentrations equal to or greater than 1.0 mg /cm2 when
using a X -ray fluorescence (XRF) instrument, or 0.5 percent (0.5 %) lead by weight
using accepted laboratory analytical methods.
Six paint chip samples were collected and analyzed for lead content. It was
determined that one sample (P -1) was lead -based paint; however, a detectable
concentration of lead was identified in three of the five remaining samples. The
following paint samples were collected:
• White /green wall paint on the lower six feet of the garage walls (Sample P-
1). The sample was determined to be lead -based and had a lead
concentration of 1.0 %.
• White /gray wall paint on the upper six feet of the garage walls (Sample P -2).
The sample was determined to contain a lead concentration of 0.079 %.
• Gray /light green paint on plaster walls and ceilings (Sample P -3). The sample
was determined to contain a lead concentration of 0.17 %.
• Black exterior paint on wood and metal surfaces (Sample P -4). The sample
was not detected above the reporting limit of 0.0016 %.
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
Page 2
• White exterior paint on wood and metal surfaces (Sample P -5). The sample
was not detected above the reporting limit of 0.0029 %.
• White exterior paint on concrete surfaces (Sample P -6). The sample was
determined to contain a lead concentration of 0.16 %.
Paint sample locations are identified on Figure 3. Sample results are summarized in
Table 2, and a copy of the laboratory analytical report is included as Appendix B.
2.4 Regulated Materials Assessment
A walk - through reconnaissance of the Property was conducted to identify and
inventory regulated materials or materials with special handling or disposal
requirements that should be removed prior to renovation and /or demolition
activities. These materials include, but are not limited to, hazardous substances,
petroleum products, PCB - containing light ballasts, mercury- containing lights and
switches, and refrigerants.
Regulated materials and other potential environmental concerns identified at the
Property are included in Table 3.
3. Methodology
3.1 Asbestos Sampling and Analysis
Sample collection and building materials assessment was conducted by a Minnesota
Department of Health (MDH) certified asbestos inspector, who has completed the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved training courses
and subsequent yearly refresher courses for the inspection of asbestos. Copies of
the certifications are included in Appendix C.
A visual assessment was conducted to identify building materials suspected of
containing asbestos. The suspect ACM was then categorized into homogeneous -
material types. A homogeneous - material type is defined as a suspect ACM that has
the same visual appearance (same color, texture, and pattern) and appears to have
been applied or constructed during the same general period of time. Materials were
also categorized as friable or non - friable, where friable materials are those that
when dry can be crushed, pulverized, or reduced to a powder by hand pressure.
Samples of homogeneous - material types were collected at random locations and
sealed in polyethylene bags. Materials were wetted prior to sampling to minimize
fiber /dust release to the environment. Samples from each homogeneous material
type were analyzed until positive. That is, once a sample in a set was found to meet
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
Page 3
the EPA definition for ACM of greater than one percent asbestos, the homogeneous -
material type is assumed to contain asbestos and other samples in the set are not
analyzed.
Asbestos samples were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) in
accordance with the EPA analytical protocol Method (EPA 600/R -93 -116, July 1993)
by Reservoirs Environmental Services, Inc. (Reservoirs), Denver, Colorado.
Reservoirs is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NVLAP), Laboratory Code 101896 -0 and participates in the American
Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Bulk Asbestos Quality Assurance Program,
Laboratory ID 101533. Additional details regarding the laboratory methodologies
are provided in the laboratory report in Appendix A.
3.2 Lead -Based Paint Sampling and Analysis
A visual assessment and sampling of painted surfaces was conducted at the
Property. Samples were collected using hand -held tools to scrape bulk paint
material from its substrate into airtight polyethylene bags. The bags were labeled
with a sample identification number and the sample information (sample ID,
location, color, sample time and date) was recorded on a chain -of- custody document
that accompanied the samples to the testing laboratory.
Samples were analyzed using flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry by
Reservoirs in Denver, Colorado. Reservoirs is accredited for the analysis of
environmental lead by the AIHA (LAB ID No. 101533) and participates in the
Environmental Lead Laboratory Analytical Program (ELLAP). Paint chip samples
collected were analyzed utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency Method SW-
846 3005A /Flame AA (7420
4. Conclusions and Recommendations
4.1 Asbestos Concerns
The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and state
regulatory agencies require the proper removal and disposal of all friable ACM and
all non - friable ACM, which could become friable, prior to renovation and/ or
demolition. Friable ACM is defined as any material that can be crumbled, pulverized
or reduced to powder using hand pressure. The NESHAP has subdivided non - friable
ACM into two categories, Category I non - friable and Category II non - friable.
Category I materials include asbestos - containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor
covering, and asphalt roofing products containing greater than one percent
asbestos. Category I non - friable materials can remain in place during normal
demolition activities under most circumstances. However, if the Category I non -
friable material will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, abrading,
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
Page 4
or other acts that may render it friable, proper removal prior to demolition will be
required. Also, Category I non - friable materials must be removed prior to
demolition if the ACM is in poor condition, becomes friable or if the building will be
demolished by burning.
Category II non - friable materials include any material that is not a friable ACM or
Category I non - friable ACM and according to the EPA, have a high probability of
becoming crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder during demolition activities.
The EPA requires that Category II materials are removed from a facility prior to
demolition, unless they have a low probability of becoming friable.
WSB identified the following ACM at the Property:
Friable ACM
• None
Category I Non - Friable ACM
• 36 square feet of interior 12 "x12" tan floor tile (Sample 7)
• 2 square feet of exterior gray putty (Sample 19)
• 170 square feet of exterior black and silver roof tar (Sample 22)
Category II Non - Friable ACM
• None
*The above listed quantities are approximate.
Material quantities estimates were obtained through visual observations of
accessible materials at the time of the survey. The demolition /renovation contractor
and all other personnel conducting work at the Property should be notified as to the
presence of ACM and other potentially hazardous materials identified in this report.
Any materials suspected of containing asbestos that are not identified in this report
should be assumed to contain asbestos unless proven otherwise by sampling.
4.2 Other Concerns
OSHA regulates the demolition, salvage, removal, encapsulation and other activities
which can potentially expose workers to lead paint or lead - containing coatings (29
CFR 1910.1025 and 29 CFR 1926.62). The OSHA standards apply to all paint and
other coatings containing lead in any detectable concentration. These standards,
including exposure monitoring, will apply to any employees conducting work
activities in the facility that will impact any paint that contains lead. In general, it is
the owner's and /or managing contractor's responsibility to communicate the
presence of lead in paint to any person or contractor who may impact it.
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
Page 5
Handling, recycling and /or disposal of special wastes /hazardous materials should
be conducted according to the requirements specific to each waste material.
4.3 Future Considerations
Destructive sampling methods to identify suspect ACMs were not used in the scope
of this this inspection. If the building is to be demolished, WSB recommends that
destructive sampling be conducted at the Property prior to the building's
demolition.
If additional suspect materials are identified during construction activities,
additional sampling will need to be performed to determine asbestos content.
Untested painted concrete from structures built before 1978 may not be used as fill
or recycled for use as aggregate without a case - specific beneficial use determination
from the MPCA.
Two oil water separators /waste traps were observed in the Property building
garage, but WSB could not access them to determine their contents due to a City
vehicle being parked on top of them. These items should be further investigated to
determine their contents for future development.
5. Standard Care and Qualifications
Services performed by WSB have been conducted in accordance with generally
recognized industry standards and current MPCA and MDH guidelines, where
applicable. The services performed by WSB have been conducted with the level of
care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession,
practicing in the same locality under similar budget and time constraints. No other
warranty is made or intended.
This report was prepared by WSB and Associates, Inc., and the results and opinions
presented are for the benefit of the City of Monticello. We appreciate the
opportunity to provide services for this project.
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
Dan Rangitsch
Environmental Scientist
MDH Asbestos Inspector No. AI11414
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
Ryan Spencer
Senior Environmental Scientist
MDH Asbestos Inspector No. AI10800
MDH Lead Risk Assessor No. LR3148
Page 6
FIGURES
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection Figures
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
■
WSB
& Associates. Inc.
[i1r o�
� Monticello
Fred's Auto Body
349 Broadway West, Monticello, MN
Figure 1- Property Location
fi
VI
11,
12
Note: Not to scale
Restroom
Must be printed in color
■
WSB
& Associates. Inc.
[i1r o�
� Monticello
14, 15, 16
Fred's Auto Body
349 Broadway West, Monticello, MN
N
20, 21 (ROOF)
Figure 2- Asbestos Sample Locations
O - Non -ACM Sample Location ( <1% Asbestos)
0 -ACM Sample Location ( >1% Asbestos)
P -3
Note: Not to scale
P -6
\ P -2
Must be printed in color
■
WSB
& Associates. Inc.
[i1r o�
� Monticello
P -4, P -5
Fred's Auto Body
349 Broadway West, Monticello, MN
Figure 3- Lead Sample Locations
P -1
A- Non -Lead Based Paint Sample Location ( <O.S% Lead)
A- Lead-Based Paint Sample Location ( >O.S %Lead)
TABLES
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection Tables
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
A
WSB
do Associates, Inc.
Table #1
Asbestos Summary Table
Fred's Auto Body
349 Broadway West
Monticello, MN 55362
Sample Identification
1
Description
White caulk
Location
Exterior restroom wall,
around door
Result
ND
- --
N/A
219,17
White plaster
Restroom, storage, and
entrance ceiling and walls
ND
- --
N/A
3
Brown plaster felt
Restroom ceiling
ND
- --
N/A
4111,12
White /gray plaster coating
Restroom and entrance
ceiling
ND
- --
N/A
5
Brown vinyl flooring with
yellow adhesive
Restroom floor
ND
ND
- --
N/A
6
White caulk
Restroom sink
ND
- --
N/A
7
12 "x12" tan floor tile
With black adhesive
Storage /water heater
room
18% Chrysotile
ND
36 SF
Cat. I non - friable
8
Red /brown caulk
Storage room wall
ND
- --
N/A
10
Yellow panel adhesive
Restroom walls
ND
- --
N/A
13
2'x4' pinhole ceiling tile
Entrance ceiling
ND
- --
N/A
14
White vinyl flooring
Entrance floor
ND
- --
N/A
15
Tan and yellow vinyl
Entrance floor
ND
- --
N/A
16
Black mastic
Entrance floor
ND
- --
N/A
18
Gray caulk
Exterior metal seams
ND
- --
N/A
19
Gray putty
Exterior
10% Chrysotile
2 SF
Cat. I non - friable
20
Black rolled shingle
Roof
ND
- --
N/A
21
Black seam tar
Roof
ND
- --
N/A
22
Black and silver roof tar
Perimeter of roof
25% Chrysotile
170 SF
Cat. I non - friable
Samples in Bold were determined to be asbestos - containing by laboratory analysis.
ND = None Detected
NA = Not Applicable
LF = Linear Feet
SF = Square Feet
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection Tables
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
A
WSB
& Associates, Inc.
Table #2
Lead -Based Paint Summary Table
Fred's Auto Body
349 Broadway West
Monticello, MN 55362
Sample
Pa ►•
Result
Quantity
Notes
Identification
P -1
White /green paint
Bottom 6' of garage
1.0%
750 SF
N/A
on concrete
P -2
White /gray paint
Top 6' of garage and
0.079%
- --
N/A
storage
P -3
Gray /light green paint
Plaster wall and
0.17%
- --
N/A
ceiling
P -4
Black paint
Exterior on wood
<0.0016%
- --
N/A
and metal
P -5
White paint
Exterior on wood
<0.0029%
- --
N/A
P -6
White paint
Exterior on concrete
0.16%
- --
N/A
Samples in Bold were determined to be lead -based by laboratory analysis.
NA = Not Applicable
LF = Linear Feet
SF = Square Feet
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection Tables
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
■ Table #3
Regulated Materials Inventory
WSB
Fred's Auto Body
349 Broadway West
��5so�la,es,lnc. Monticello, MN 55362
Restroom
• None
Entrance
• 4', 4 -bulb fluorescent light fixture - 4 each
• 4', 2 -bulb fluorescent light fixture - 6 each
• Hydraulic door arm- 1 each
Storage
• 4', 2 -bulb fluorescent light fixture - 2 each
• 8', 2 -bulb fluorescent light fixture - 1 each
• Water heater - 1 each
• Water meter - 1 each
• Circuit board - 1 each
• Motor for heater - 1 each
Garage
• 4', 2 -bulb fluorescent light fixture - 5 each
• 8', 2 -bulb fluorescent light fixture - 5 each
• Garage door opener - 2 each
• Garage heater - 2 each
• Hydraulic door arm - 1 each
• Mercury thermostat - 1 each
• Oil water separator/ waste trap (unknown contents) - 2 each
Exterior
• Gas meter - 1 each
• Electric meter - 1 each
• 8', 2 -bulb fluorescent light fixture - 12 each
Note: All quantities are approximate.
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection Tables
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
APPENDIX A
Asbestos Laboratory Analytical Report
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection Appendices
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Effective January 1, 2015
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual T: \QAQC \Lab \Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
REI LAB Reservainq Environmental, Inc_
T
February 11, 2016 Subcontract Number: NA
Laboratory Report: RES 342451 -1
Project # / P.O. # 2596 -170
Project Description: Fred's Auto Body
WSB & Associates, Inc.
701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300
Minneapolis MN 55416
Dear Customer,
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Industrial Hygiene and
Environmental matrices by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program ( NVLAP), Lab Code 101896 -0
for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis and the American
Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), Lab ID 101533 - Accreditation Certificate #480 for Phase Contrast
Microscopy (PCM) analysis. This laboratory is currently proficient in both Proficiency Testing and PAT programs
respectively.
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. has analyzed the following samples for asbestos content as per your request. The
analysis has been completed in general accordance with the appropriate methodology as stated in the attached
analysis table. The results have been submitted to your office.
RES 342451 -1 is the job number assigned to this study. This report is considered highly confidential
and the sole property of the customer. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. will not discuss any part of this study with
personnel other than those of the client. The results described in this report only apply to the samples analyzed.
This report must not be used to claim endorsement of products or analytical results by NVLAP or any agency of the
U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval from Reservoirs
Environmental, Inc. Samples will be disposed of after sixty days unless longer storage is requested. If you have any
questions about this report, please feel free to call 303 - 964 -1986.
Sincerely,
Nicole Castillo for
Jeanne Spencer
President
P: 303 - 964 -1986 5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216 1- 866 -RESI -ENV
F: 303 - 477 -4275 www.reilab.com
Page 1 of 1
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
TABLE: PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Method:
Turnaround:
Date Samples Analyzed:
RES 342451 -1
WSB & Associates, Inc.
2596 -170
Fred's Auto Body
February 10, 2016
EPA 600 /R- 93/116 - Short Report, Bulk
3 -5 Day
February 11, 2016
Effective January 1, 2016
Q: \QAQC \LAB \Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
ND =None Detected
TR= Trace, <1% Visual Estimate
Tre m/Act=Trem ol ite/Acti no lite
Client
Sample
Number
Lab
ID Number
L
A Sub
Y Physical Part
E Description
R ( %)
Asbestos Content
Mineral Visual
Estimate
Non
Asbestos
Fibrous
Components
Non -
Fibrous
Components
#1
EM 1569598
A White caulk 100
ND
6
94
#2
EM 1569599
A White plaster 100
ND
0
100
#3
EM 1569600
A Brown felt 100
ND
98
2
#4
EM 1569601
A White granular plaster w/ off white paint 100
ND
0
100
#5
EM 1569602
A Yellow mastic 10
ND
0
100
B Gray /multi - colored sheet vinyl w/ tan fibrous backing 90
ND
15
85
material
#6
EM 1569603
A White caulk 100
ND
2
98
#7
EM 1569604
A Black/orange mastic 20
ND
0
100
B Tan floor tile 80
Chrysotile 18
0
82
#8
EM 1569605
A Red /brown caulk 100
ND
0
100
#9
EM 1569606
A White granular plaster 100
ND
0
100
#10
EM 1569607
A Yellow adhesive 100
ND
0
100
#11
EM 1569608
1 A White granular plaster w/ green paint 100
ND
0
100
TEM Analysis recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1 %.
P: 303 - 964 -1986 5801 Logan Street, Suite 100, Denver, CO 80216 1- 866 -RESI -ENV
F: 303 - 477 -4275 vwwv. rei lab. com
Page 1 of 2
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
TABLE: PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Method:
Turnaround:
Date Samples Analyzed:
RES 342451 -1
WSB & Associates, Inc.
2596 -170
Fred's Auto Body
February 10, 2016
EPA 600 /R- 93/116 - Short Report, Bulk
3 -5 Day
February 11, 2016
Effective January 1, 2016
Q: \QAQC \LAB \Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
ND =None Detected 7
TR= Trace, <1% Visual Estimate
Tre m/Act=Trem ol ite/Acti no lite
Client
Sample
Number
Lab
ID Number
L
A Sub
Y Physical Part
E Description
R ( %)
Asbestos Content
Mineral Visual
Estimate
Non
Asbestos
Fibrous
Components
Non -
Fibrous
Components
#12
EM 1569609
A White granular plaster w/ brown paint 100
ND
0
100
#13
EM 1569610
A Tan /white perlitic ceiling tile 100
ND
60
40
#14
EM 1569611
A White /off white sheet vinyl w/ tan fibrous backing material 100
ND
20
80
#15
EM 1569612
A Tan /yellow sheet vinyl w/ tan fibrous backing material 100
ND
10
90
#16
EM 1569613
A Black mastic 100
ND
0
100
#17
EM 1569614
A White granular plaster 100
ND
0
100
#18
EM 1569615
A Gray caulk 100
ND
0
100
#19
EM 1569616
A Gray resinous material 100
Chrysotile 10
0
90
#20
EM 1569617
A Black shingle 100
ND
40
60
#21
EM 1569618
A Black tar 100
ND
0
100
#22
EM 1569619
1 A Black granular fibrous tar 100
Chrysotile 25
0
75
TEM Analysis recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1 %.
O� SPaige Terry
Analyst / Data QA
P: 303 - 964 -1986 5801 Logan Street, Suite 100, Denver, CO 80216 1- 866 -RESI -ENV
F: 303 - 477 -4275 vwwv. rei lab. com
Page 2 of 2
Due Date: ` 7 t
Due Time: W Z
RES -^as ff?d>- 5@r1L/oirs Env %ro17me17ta►, Inc.
5601 Logan St Denver, C 802145 - Ph 363 964 -1986 • Fax 303-47 7-4275 • Toll Free .886 RES[ -ENV
After Hours Cell Phone: 720.339 -9228
SUBMITTED BY* INVOICE TO: (IF DIFFERENT ) CONTACT
INFORMATION:
RES 342451
Page
1 of
com4wny WSB & Associates, Inc. 'ny:
Fed Ex Tikkng #: 7756 1145 0522
DateMme:
-
Sample Condition-
Temp. (F°
contact
Jeff Rice
Laboratory Use Only _ f Hand 1 fedEx I UPS I LISPS I
Received By OatelTime: 3 t �= Lf �t Carrier: D Sax I Courier
Data Entry Contact
ne Email Fax Date Time
Initials
Contact.
Phone Email Fax Date
Adds..:- 7p1 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 6s:
Initials
Contact
Phone Email Fax Date Time
Initials
Phone-
783- 5414800
Time
Initials
Phone
Minneapolis MN 55418 - - - —
rte;
F °`:
-
-- - -- - - — -�
ceillpagar
CeWpager
PrgedNemeerand•or P.°. t 25595.170 �
Final Data Deliverable Email Address:
ProiaciarscripeonlLO ftW FredrsAuto Body -
-rice. rs enter. dran itsch & dmuller ben .com
ASBESTOS LABORATORY HOURS: Weekdays: lam - 7pm & Sat Barn - 5pm
REQUESTED ANALYSIS
VALID MATRIX CODES
LAB NOTES:
PLM 1 PCM I TEM —RUSH (Same Day) _ PRIORITY (Next Day) l[ STANDARD (3 -$ Day)
`
Air = A_ Bulk = B
(Rush PCM = 2hr, TEM w 6hr.)
g
a
o
ti
o s
g ts
i
b
�
@
�
a
Dust = ❑ Paint = P
Soil = S Wipe = W
Swab = SW F =Food
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY HOURS: Weekdays: Sam - Spm
Metal(s) I Dust' _ RUSH, 24 hr. _3.5 Day
"Prior notification is
RCRA 8 1 Metals & Welding
' Y w z
a 3 n a ; �¢ m
Drinking Water =DWI Waste Water WW
RUSH (3 Day )_5 Day _10 Day required for RUSH
Fume Scan 1 TCLP'" —
m
a
❑
c
m
!
a
D Other
___
turnarounds."
24 hr. 3 day 5 Da
Organics _ y y
:➢
_
w y
w
e
`a
+
y
= m
?
S
c
,
W
m
c
m
i
"
„ u,
+
r
••ASTM E1792 roved wi media onl
pe Y°
MICROBIOLOGY LABORATORY HOURS: Weekdays, gam - 5pm
E.coli andlor Collforms' _ 24.48 Hour Other:
Pathogens' 24 -48 Hour
c�
$
_
V
+
w
_
'TAT dependent on speed of
y
Microbial Growth' _ 5 -10 Day microbial growth.*
=
w
❑
Y
p' ¢
o
¢
Legionella _ 10 Day
as
m
o
Mold _ RUSH _24 Hr _48 Hr 3 Day _5 Day
$
C
W
a
?
d
d: _s. w
a
¢
n
U
o --
# I
!z
a –
Q)
w `
"Turnaround times establish a laboratory priority, subject to laboratory volume and are not
EM Number
guaranteed. Additional fees apply for afterhours. weekends and holidays."
z w m 8 s c a m ff
�' `� z L m 3 c
m 1% Date Time
Special Instructions:
2
m
'
o f m o
4 �
MICRBIDLOGY
*
b
a
U Collected Collected
hfumm a P
(I W"atbry Use On ly)
Client sample ID number (Sample ID's must be une)
7
#1
X
-�
I
#3 —
x
3
_.....
X
- - - - - --- - - - - -- - -- - - — - --
cl L
5
#5
#6
X
-
6
#7
X
(e, +
— -
7
8
- - -_
#8
_
x
- - - --
- - - --
- - - - - - - –
tv
#s
9
90 #10 x I c
Number of samples received: 22 (Additional samples shall be listed on attached long form.)
NOTE: RD will analyze ww4rNrlg samples based opm lydorrnatlon received and will not bo responsible for @Roes or omissions in caludalions rasJhng ffom the haocuracy of orlginal data. By signing Clienvcom pany representative agrees that submrs sion of the foltomng samples for requested analysis
- _ ._ � _ __ � __ .�._ w�__ v n. _._�. ___i• _�_......_ __ __�.a:... ....:�. �.,.- .... -. ...N. ..s�..w• wn.• N AlCT 'H1 Aw.a frYw !n �r -..N� u.rlh nwmMl fem�c mss ras.ih in a 7 54f. rnoNhl� inl.ros! cwcharoe
Relinquished By:
Fed Ex Tikkng #: 7756 1145 0522
DateMme:
-
Sample Condition-
Temp. (F°
On Ice
Yes 1 No
Sealed ct
Yes/No (Yes /,No
Laboratory Use Only _ f Hand 1 fedEx I UPS I LISPS I
Received By OatelTime: 3 t �= Lf �t Carrier: D Sax I Courier
Data Entry Contact
ne Email Fax Date Time
Initials
Contact
Phone Email Fax Date
Time
Initials
Contact
Phone Email Fax Date Time
Initials
Contact
Phone Email Fax Date
Time
Initials
4-2014-version 1
Rol L-AL ReHorvainff En vlrw7mi n tal Inc-
T $901 Logan SI Demmer• CO 90296 - Ph: 30.3 964 -19&6 • Fax 303477 -4275 • Tall Free 856 RESI -ENV
RES Job # `t Page 2 of r
Submitted by: WS6 81 Associates, Inc.
REQUESTED ANALYSIS
VALID MATRIX CODES
LAS NOTES:
CQ
c
y
'L
w
d
�y
1• m 4
m
¢
a) a
a
o
ui
o
m
w a m
_
1n ~ V
A s a
f it
F m
°ot
s � j 3
C p
•- Q m o
u u} s
MICROBIOLOGY
_
5
c
`o
5
o
m
s
M
f
mj
❑
J
x
W
d
Air = A Bulk = 8
Dust = D 1 Paint = P
Soil S Wipe = W
Swab SW F = Food
Drirtkinp Water = pW waste Water = WW
D k other
"ASTM E1792 approved wipe media only-
E
Cate Time
m Collected Collected
a¢ u �c I mrvddyy nn.n,n, ua
1z 01
A V M
EM Number
ILaboratory Use Only)
Client sample ID number (Sample ID's must be unique)
11
#11
-
12 .._ ...... .. . . .. .......... ...........
.
#13
#14
#15
x
-- --
x
......
x
x
x
x
- - - - -- - -- - ------
- - - -
-
- - - -
- - - - - - --
-
-
- --
I %. _... ..
1 c r'
- --
1
12
13
14
15
16
i�
#16
I
17
#17
x
19
20
x
x
#19
({j
#20
t
21
-
#21
x
x
1
I
--
-
- - - - -- - --
Y_ . - - - - - -- • - -- -- --------------------------------
i
- - - -- --
-
-
-- - - -•
--
-
- -
- - - - --
- -- - -- - _
22
#22
23
25
25
-
-
27
28
- - ----- .. - ....
- - - -- -----
-- -- -- - - - ------ •--- - - - - -•
- -
29
-
30
31
- --
_ ............. ...... °__,_ _.. ....r ---- - -- - .......
I
- -- _
-
-
— - - -- - -.. _
32
- - - -... - - -- ............. r__. ..�.......__...........__......
- -- - - - --- - - - - --
34
35
36
3T
38
39
40
41
4-2014-version 1
WSB and Associates, Inc. (WSB)
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
Phone (763) 541 -4800
Fax (763) 541 -1700
Asbestos Sample Chain of Custody form
WSB Project Number. 2.5% -17
Project Name: Fn I AVI& -%4,, —
Date Sampled: ALIT l�
Number of Samples:•
Samplers Signatures:_
Laboratory Instructions: Analyze for percent asbestos by PLM. Test samples until Mater than
I% asbestos o ressive ty layer.
Please e-mail results t , rspencer @wsbeng.com, and
drangitsch@wsbeng.com.
Laboratory Turnaround Time: 6to S Da
Samples Shipped By: Fed -Ex
Relinquished _S Date: a Time: p."
Received By: _fir --�' Date: Time:
Relinquished By: Date: Time:
Received By: Date: Time:
St. Cloud • Mlnneapolk ■ St. Paul • Rochester •Northfield *Bismarck
Equal Oppxpnlly Employer
wsbeng.ow
■
WSB
vt7S ..:�14 -�,qS�
Project Number �)M1` -170
Address 3x19 Zcmduah_ w
DateZigl G
Page I of
Sample
Number
Code
Material Description
Sample Location
Friable
YIN YIN *
Condition
Potential
Damage
1
;M _
�t F
w
N D SD
N b SD
2
1
wier`.ie re'C r i �&
Q Cenn
N
N SD
N D SD
3
�
❑ SD
N 13 SD
M�
� r
4
Q �
./
SD
N D SD
w
c'
C
r
m• _
xti
�.
N
SD
N b 5D
6
�1i L-
ll
WT` 5' trA�l S 4.fr
Fit
D" SID
N D SE)
7
I� F1sxk w bLu Tk
(; " :7
N
t
D SD
N D SD
LN"
D 5D
N D SD
9
-3
N
r
N(�p SD
N D SD
t
I0
Mt
N
D SD
N D SD
11
e.+is
Y
N 5 SD
N ❑ SD
12
L
A,
N
Y*
N SD
N D SD
13
M, c
�.x�` �
�/
SD
N D SD
14
r
i t!
r vn-
+ti
D SD
N D SD
15
7
D SD
N D SD
16
D SD
N D SD
17
FA
N
N SD
N D SD
w
18
w w1civi
e_ _lc f�
N D SD
N D SD
J J
FT = Floor tile G B = Gypsum Board CTM = Ceiling Tile Mastic CA = Carpet Adhesive
P = Plaster TP = Troweled Plaster SVF =Sheet Vinyl Flooring AS = Acoustical Spray
ST = Stucco CL = Caulking RFL = Roof Flashing RFF = Roofing Felt
BC = Base Cove TSI = Thermal Systems Insulation G13JT&JC = GB wj tape and joint compound * = Friable during demolition
f
. Project Number 7 996 _ y7 G
WS8 `[ 2 , f I Address �..
T `t I Date p
&�■� Page _� of — —_
Sample
Code
Material Description
Sample Location
Friable
Condition
Potential
Number
YIN YIN *
Damage
19
N S❑
N D SD
&emtt Air-
CATrwr
zo
j - S
bw r i
f Q
DSO
N ❑SD
21
f'^ c -4i
bsp* f.,
D SD
D
N SD
Z2
t 4W [1�t�f s tl
D SD
N D 5D
23
N D SD
N ❑ SD
24
N D SD
N ❑ S❑
25
N D SD
N D SD
26
N D SD
N D SD
27
N ❑ SD
N D SD
28
N D SD
N D SD
29
- -N D SD
N D SD
30
N D SD
N D SD
31
N D SD
N D S❑
32
N D SD
N D SD
33
N D SD
N D SD
34
N ❑ SD
N D SD
35
N D SD
N D SD
35
N D SO
N D SD
FT = Floor the GB = Gypsum Board CTM = Ceiling Tile Mastic CA = Carpet Adhesive
P = Plaster TP = Troweled Plaster SVF = Sheet Vinyl Flooring AS = Acoustical Spray
ST = Stucco CL = Caulking RFL = hoof Flashing RFF = Roofing Felt
BC = Base Cove TSl = Thermal Systems Insulation GB/T8&JC = GB w/ tape and joint compound * = Friable during demolition
/.
W
R.
a
P.
i
a.
x
GE 547 � ry p F 8B16 BA RA SEAjFL]
61S A M8NEi37
30 tNVU SOUTH, SUE 300
NUN+iEFWOLIS "N 55416 BILL THIRD PARTY .
UNTE4 STATES US
To
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
5801 LOGAN STREET #100
DENVER CO 80216
[303] 984.1988 r�F
DEPT
III IIIIlIIil91N1iElll Ililllll 11 111 lll111111111lIII f IIl1111l11111lIIlIIII II! Ill
't FecFE,-s.
nE�
1
y
WED -10 FEB 3:OOP
STANDARD OVERNIGHT
1756 1145 0522
84215
�0�5 DEN
NA DENA
a
� e
poll
€F
a�
fr
•
APPENDIX B
Lead -Based Paint Laboratory Analytical Report
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection Appendices
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Effective January 1, 2015
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual T: \QAQC \Lab \Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
REI LAB RE3sE3rvo►rs Envjrorlmental, 117C_
February 11, 2016
Ryan Spencer
WSB & Associates, Inc.
701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300
Minneapolis MN 55416
Dear Customer,
Laboratory Code:
Subcontract Number:
Laboratory Report:
Project # / PO #:
Project Description:
RES
NA
RES 342460 -1
02596 -170
Fred's Auto Body 349
Broadway W
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Industrial Hygiene and
Environmental matrices by the American Industrial Hygiene Association, Lab ID 101533 - Accreditation Certificate #480.
The laboratory is currently proficient in both IHPAT & ELPAT programs respectively.
Reservoirs has analyzed the following sample(s) using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) / Atomic Emission
Spectroscopy - Inductively Coupled Plasma (AES -ICP) per your request. Reported sample results were not blank
corrected. The analysis has been completed in general accordance with the appropriate methodology as stated in the
analysis table. Results have been sent to your office.
RES 342460 -1 is the job number assigned to this study. This report is considered highly confidential and the sole
property of the customer. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. will not discuss any part of this study with personnel other than
those authorized by the client. The results described in this report only apply to the samples analyzed. This report shall
not be reproduced except in full, without written approval from Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Samples will be disposed
of after sixty days unless longer storage is requested. If you should have any questions about this report, please feel
free to call me at 303 - 964 -1986.
Sincerely,
Jeanne Spencer
President
P:303- 964 -1986
F:303- 477 -4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 1 of 2
1- 866 - RESI -EN V
vmw.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
TABLE
Effective January 1, 2015
T: \QAQC \Lab \Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
5801 Logan St., Suite 100
Denver CO 80216
ANALYSIS:
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Analysis Type:
Turnaround:
Date Samples Analyzed:
LEAD IN PAINT
RES 342460 -1
WSB & Associates, Inc.
02596 -170
Fred's Auto Body 349 Broadway W
February 10, 2016
USEPA SW846 3050B / AA (7420)
3 -5 Day
February 11, 2016
Client
ID Number
Lab
ID Number
Reporting
Limit
( %)
LEAD
CONCENTRATION
( %)
P -1
EM 1569579
0.0027
1.0
P -2
EM 1569580
0.0017
0.079
P -3
EM 1569581
0.0017
0.17
P -4
EM 1569582
0.0016
BRL
P -5
EM 1569583
0.0029
BRL
P -6
EM 1569584
0.0039
0.16
* Unless otherwise noted all quality control samples performed within specifications
established by the laboratory.
BRL = Below Reporting Limit
P:303- 964 -1986
1 =:303- 477 -4275
Analyst / Data QA:
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 2 of 2
Renee A. Cortez
1- 866 -RESI -ENV
www.reilab.com
Due Date.
Due Time'. �
SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY;
�ay. WSB & Associat_es, his.
�^ 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapdis, MN 55416
a—,- -, N—ib " andlor P.Q. ■! r -.�, e K t _ 17l-,
Reservoirs E nvi r Urns I Inc. � RES 342466
2059 Bryant St. Denver, CO 80211 Page ai
(303} 954 -1986 Fax(303)477-4275 Tolt Free (866) RESI -ENV —
INVOICE TO: (IF DIFFERENT) CONTACT INFORMATION:
- - -- - — - - - -- Phow„
E�honc:
Fax 763.541.17017 Fa -
PCMIPLmrrEM _ RUSH _ 24 hr. ,L3.5 day (Rush PGWPLM = 2hr, TEAL • 6hr.)
CHEMISTRY
l tkQFY'�HE3l]RS:
I-4 -
Metal(s) RUSH
24 hr. -&3-5 Day
RCRA 8A10als Scan RUSH
10 day "PriorwMfication IS
5 day Y
f
required iar RUSH
TCLPI Welding Fume Scan
turnarounds."
RUSH
24 hr. 5 Day
Dust _
�3
'Organics 24 hr.
3 day `S flay
- ...YuuwllE
I - ssc i.ii..
de
y�am^•-� yy�� }.,,. �j.�g�_ __,„may.•
_ F
"Ail &IyB�G'Eu MAfCUyr}!4 �y$'�ils!4'-�•�' ,y��,R'(1 ` +'R���}}S �y, .. : s
tYPerc :t
-_tt lfir'
fWldysaidikloiralTf{yTpEr1f�
fl(Ir!4rl�rl"�9ls
specie! Instructions:
-1D rnmun
fill nt :sample
IL
-
4d
t!
�a
r N
N
C7
�`
v;
N
W
F
1
Numberof samples received:
NOTE:. REI VAN ana" incaming
a fees 0,et subm65sion of the Oak
Relinqu €shed BY:
LaSoratory Use Only
Received By:
Results: Contact
Nl v t Contact
—1 Final
t .
Air = A Bulk = B
Duet = D Faint = P
50�
-S I wipe W
Drinking Water = DW
Waste Water = WW
Other -0
"ASTM 617962 approved wipe media only'•
m In
d 0 Date *me
x Collected Collected 5,%
wY g n^^�ll Cs^
!i55 y. T '� 'y:7 'C `' •4} .fix. s s.s lil
. 5 s�•..�i s• � s. $ "c-�. 's s• iii .t:. -: .�,. r-
w I
(Addititonal samples shall be 111 sled on attached long form •] representative
sed upa inforrnatlon received a,)d roil not toe responsible lar errors or omissions in ca�ulatfons reaulti from the lrteecursaY of orl Inal data. By slgnirtg cient'cornPar 5 P
is For re and •s as indlcamd an this Chain 01 u shell Cpns ULl an 8rra iCal 5$NICe" a 1 e e en<tefT5 Ot NET da
pateJTims
pate/Time: �.� € `z Vim` `� ~ Carrier S
Phone Email Fax Date T1me Initials Con ant Pa
Phone Emall Fax Date itme Intgais Contact Page
arr. Sample Condl ion: On Ice
Temp. (F° YIN
Phone Email Fax Date
Phone Email Fax Date
Sealed
YIN
Time
Time
intact
V
Initials
Initials
O
IL
-
4d
t!
�a
r N
N
C7
�`
v;
N
W
F
IL
1,-w
C
t .
Air = A Bulk = B
Duet = D Faint = P
50�
-S I wipe W
Drinking Water = DW
Waste Water = WW
Other -0
"ASTM 617962 approved wipe media only'•
m In
d 0 Date *me
x Collected Collected 5,%
wY g n^^�ll Cs^
!i55 y. T '� 'y:7 'C `' •4} .fix. s s.s lil
. 5 s�•..�i s• � s. $ "c-�. 's s• iii .t:. -: .�,. r-
w I
(Addititonal samples shall be 111 sled on attached long form •] representative
sed upa inforrnatlon received a,)d roil not toe responsible lar errors or omissions in ca�ulatfons reaulti from the lrteecursaY of orl Inal data. By slgnirtg cient'cornPar 5 P
is For re and •s as indlcamd an this Chain 01 u shell Cpns ULl an 8rra iCal 5$NICe" a 1 e e en<tefT5 Ot NET da
pateJTims
pate/Time: �.� € `z Vim` `� ~ Carrier S
Phone Email Fax Date T1me Initials Con ant Pa
Phone Emall Fax Date itme Intgais Contact Page
arr. Sample Condl ion: On Ice
Temp. (F° YIN
Phone Email Fax Date
Phone Email Fax Date
Sealed
YIN
Time
Time
intact
V
Initials
Initials
APPENDIX C
Certifications
Asbestos and Regulated Materials Inspection Appendices
Fred's Auto Body
WSB Project No. 02596 -170
Certificate No: 5LM11101505IR
Expiration Date: November 10, 2016
This is to certify that
Daniel Rangitsch
has attended and successfully completed an
ASBESTOS INSPECTOR
REFRESHER TRAINING COURSE
permitted by
the State of Minnesota under Minnesota Rules 4620.3702 to 4620.3722
and meets the requirements of
Section 206 of Title II of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
conducted by
Lake States Environmental, Ltd.
in
Hudson, Wl on November 90, 2095
Examination Date: November 10, 2095
Lake States Environmental, Ltd
P. O. Box 645, Rice Lake, WI 54868
(800) 254 -9811 Training ns uctor
o w. v m 0500
� p y3
a
a
2 Q-Z:
gam:
m M
s y..
CD
N � fA
N0:...;
M O
0
4 O
Certificate No: 5LM06081502SR Expiration Date: June 8, 2016
This is to certify that
Ryan Spencer
has attended and successfully completed an
ASBESTOS SUPER VISOR
REFRESHER TRAINING COURSE
permitted by
the State of Minnesota under Minnesota Rules 4620.3702 to 4620.3722
and meets the requirements of
Section 206 of Title II of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
conducted by
Lake States Environmental, Ltd.
in
White Bear Lake, MN on June S, 2015
Examination Date: June S, 20 15
t - -2- - P4 -r - - - - - - -- - - - °']- . l .. .
ASBESTOS
.d...E.,,...,. SITE
Certifiers by: SUPERVISOR
Stat�ot Minnesota
De pdmento# Flealth
Explres:-*01,08f 07.6 a
Ryan G Spencer
180: Pennsylvania Ave S
St Louis Park, MN 55436
No. A810800 Issued: 06 /15/2015
�,, �
Training Ins ctor
Certificate No: 5LM02031508IR Expiration Date: February 3, 2016
This is to certify that
Ryan G. Spencer
has attended and successfully completed an
ASBESTOS INSPECTOR
REFRESHER TRAINING COURSE
permitted by
the State of Minnesota under Minnesota Rules 4620.3702 to 4620.3722
and meets the requirements of
Section 206 of Title II of the Toxic Substances Control. Act (TSCA)
conducted by
Lake States Environmental, Ltd.
in
White Bear Lake, MN on February 3, 2095
Examination Date: February 3, 2015
Lake States Environmental, Ltd
P. O. Box 645, Rir
(800) 254 -9811
ASBESTOS
Certified by`.
State of Minnesota
Department of Health r%
Expires: 02103/201&:=.
F�fan G Spencer
1NI Pennsylvania Ave S Y
Sttouis Park, MN 55436
Na. A1108OG Issued: 02/10/2015
Training Inst ctor
Certificate No: 5LM05211509PbRAR
LEAD
Risk A
Issue Date: May 21, 2015
This diploma is awarded to
Ryan G. Spencer
1801 Pennsylvania Ave S St Louis Park MN 55426
for successfully completing and passing the examination for the
LEAD (Pb) RISK ASSESSOR
REFRESHER TRAINING COURSE
This training course is Approved by the State of Minnesota
under Minnesota Rules, parts 4761.2000 to 4761.2700
and meets the requirements of 40 CFR 745.225,
and Title X of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
conducted by
Lake States Environmental, Ltd.
in
White Bear Lake, MN on May 21, 2015
,Examination Date: May 21, 2015
ssessor
168
v
Licensed by:
!gal
state of Minnesota
Bob a -
Train' nurse Manager
Department of Health
License No. 1-113`148
Expires 05121!2016
Ryan G Spencer
Ave S
• .. ,; :
ro�jr��:i'r �; ;��C:��`�: :.,
�� :.. :.
f•� ''r4i� „i��'ia`a:�.;
: ;. ; _1 _`
'J� ►��i i §; «i �i��ia ,':;
-` `- .�,,;,..,,a`a.a,.
. ,, , .. :..
' ' %•i'•i�i�: �d�a�ii +ia�': "s�ii'i.S: 't�'i
;' ,•:::::,.,,,r:::•• �` '-.:;y.•r,,y
1801 Pennsylvania
,'`.•=�:'' %:..,::::��' ;:; % %..;�:• %'�':;�?�::`�,
:;�::'s's
St Louis Park, MN 65436
' %::'t'_:< ';;.::.'�;:,
%s`: t::?d;; ►.�''
''.;.L.'s� %:;;::::3:•,
•; %::�s��;,::'i.�:::�;�:'
�' ' i:::':'.: ?�
,,,\ItI ut,%4
AIHA
�'
�
�ratory Accreditation
Programs, LLC
' ti i l n1a
AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC
acknowledges that
LEGEND Technical Services, Inc.
88 Empire Drive, St. Paul, MN 55103
Laboratory ID: 101095
along with all premises from which key activities are performed, as listed above, has fulfilled the requirements of the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation
Programs (AIHA -LAP), LLC accreditation to the ISO/IEC 17025:2005 international standard, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing
and Calibration Laboratories in the following:
LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS
✓ INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Accreditation Expires: 07/01/2017
✓ ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD Accreditation Expires: 07/01/2017
❑ ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Accreditation Expires:
❑ FOOD Accreditation Expires:
❑ UNIQUE SCOPES Accreditation Expires:
Specific Field(s) of Testing (FoT)/Method(s) within each Accreditation Program for which the above named laboratory maintains accreditation is
outlined on the attached Scope of Accreditation. Continued accreditation is contingent upon successful on -going compliance with ISO/IEC
17025:2005 and AIHA -LAP, LLC requirements. This certificate is not valid without the attached Scope of Accreditation. Please review the AIHA -
LAP, LLC website (www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org) for the most current Scope.
Gerald Schultz, CIH
Chairperson, Analytical Accreditation Board
U, a�4�
Cheryl O. Morton
Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC
Revision 14: 03/26/2014 Date Issued: 06/30/2015
T Of
Ck
�47ES OF
July 01st, 2015
Jeanne Spencer
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100
Denver, CO 80216
Dear Ms. Spencer,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
NVLAP Lab Code: 101896 -0
Thank you for continuing your accreditation for Asbestos Fiber Analysis under the National
Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). This accreditation is effective until June
30, 2016, provided that your laboratory continues to comply with the accreditation requirements
contained in the NVLAP Procedures.
Your updated accreditation documents are enclosed. You may reproduce these documents in
their entirety and use the NVLAP symbol and /or term to reference your accredited status in
accordance with the requirements published in NIST Handbook 150, 1.8. Accreditation does not
relieve your laboratory from observing and complying with any applicable existing laws and /or
regulations.
We are pleased to have you participate in NVLAP and look forward to your continued
association with this program. If you have any questions concerning your NVLAP accreditation,
please direct them to Hazel Richmond, Program Manager, Laboratory Accreditation Program,
National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Dr. Stop 2140, Gaithersburg, MD
20899 -2140; (301) 975 -3024.
Sincerely,
Warren R. Merkel, Chief
National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
KIST /NVLAP • 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 2140 • Gaithersburg, MD 20899 -2140
KWda
http://www.nist.gov/nvlap
OF Cp1-41cc
National Voluntary Q 9m
Laboratory Accreditation Program y "°
SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISOJEC 17025:2005
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100
Denver, CO 80216
Ms. Jeanne Spencer
Phone: 303-964-1986 Fax: 303-477-4275
Email: jeanne@reilab.com
http://www.reilab.com
ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS NVLAP LAB CODE 101896 -0
Bulk Asbestos Analysis
Code Description
181A01 EPA 600/M4 -82 -020: Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples
181A03 EPA 6001R- 931116: Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials
Airborne Asbestos Analysis
Code Description
18/A02 U.S. EPA's "Interim Transmission Electron Microscopy Analytical Methods - Mandatory and
Nonmandatory -and Mandatory Section to Determine Completion of Response Actions" as found in
40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix A.
1�/aw—
y the Natrona Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
Effective 2015 -06 -29 through 2016 -06 -30 Page I of 1
United States Department of Commerce
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Nv�Q�
Certificate of Accreditation to ISO /IEC 17025:2005
NVLAP LAB CODE: 101896 -0
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Denver, CO
is accredited by the National Voluntary ,Laboratory Accreditation Program for specific services,
listed on the Scope of Accreditation, for.
Asbestos Fiber Analysis
This laboratory is accredited in accordance with the recognized Intemational Standard IS011EC 97025:2005.
This accreditation demonstrates technical competence for a defined scope and the operation of a laboratory quality
management system (refer to joint ISO - ILAC -IAF Communique dated January 2009).
2015 -06 -29 through 2016 -06 -30
Effective Dates
sw OF cogs
For the Natio al Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
p`�4TE'S Of pt!