Planning Commission Agenda 05-03-2011
AGENDA
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, May 3rd, 2011
6:00 PM
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Commissioners: Rod Dragsten, Brad Fyle, Charlotte Gabler, William Spartz, and
Barry Voight
Council Liaison: Lloyd Hilgart
Staff: Angela Schumann, Ron Hackenmueller, Steve Grittman – NAC
1. Call to order.
2. Consideration to approve the Planning Commission minutes of April 5th, 2011.
3. Citizen Comments.
4. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
5. Public Hearing – Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for Veterinary Clinic
in a B-4 (Regional Business) and Amendment to Planned Unit Development for Quad
Development.
Applicant: Quad Development
6. Public Hearing – Consideration of a request for Rezoning from B-3(Highway Business) to
B-4 (Regional Business) and a request for Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned
Unit Development for the Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition.
Applicant: IRET Properties
7. Public Hearing - Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance,
Chapter 2, Section 4, Chapter 5, Section 3(D) and Chapter 5, Section 4. (AS)
Applicant: City of Monticello
8. Consideration to call for a public hearing on Amendment to the 2008 Monticello
Comprehensive Plan for the Adoption of the 2011 Monticello Parks & Trails Plan.
9. Consideration to call for a Public Hearing on Amendment of the Monticello Zoning Map.
10. Community Development Director’s Report
11. Adjourn.
Planning Commission Minutes – 04/05/11
1
MINUTES
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Commissioners Present: Rod Dragsten, Bill Spartz, Barry Voight, Charlotte Gabler,
Brad Fyle
Council Liaison Absent: Lloyd Hilgart
Staff: Angela Schumann, Ron Hackenmueller, Steve Grittman-NAC,
Andrea McDowell-Poehler
1. Call to order
Chairman Rod Dragsten called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Consideration to approve Planning Commission minutes of March 1st, 2011
BRAD FYLE MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MARCH 1ST, 2011.
MOTION WAS SECONDED BY BARRY VOIGHT. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
3. Citizen Comments
None
4. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
a) Wild and Scenic DNR ruling
5. Public Hearing - Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance relating to adult-oriented land uses, including amendments to Chapter
3.6 (Industrial Base Zoning Districts), 3.6 (D) I-1, Light Industrial District, 3.6 (E)
I-2, Heavy Industrial District; and including amendments to Chapter 3.7, Overlay
Zoning Districts; and including amendments to Chapter 5.1, Table 5-1; and
amendments to Chapter 5.6, Table 5-6; and including amendments to Chapter 5.6
(F), Regulations for Commercial Uses; and amendments to the official zoning map
of the City of Monticello. Applicant: City of Monticello
The City’s existing regulations limit adult-oriented uses to the I-2 District, and maintain
a 700 foot buffer from sensitive uses. This limitation has left the City with an
“opportunity area” in the range of just one percent of usable land area, and just a few
eligible parcels– a range that raises significant concerns over the legality of the
regulations. In the City Attorney’s analysis, it is noted that the 5% informal threshold has
virtually always served as adequate evidence of “reasonable opportunity” in providing
for adult-oriented uses.
Planning Commission Minutes – 04/05/11
2
The Planning Commission directed staff to examine opportunities to maximize the
separation distance from adult-oriented uses while also providing a defensible
regulation. Steve Grittman presented two options to address this request: recalculate the
zoning and buffer zone distance to increase percentage above 5% of City area or reset
zoning allowances to increase the number of available parcels making the percentage
less relevant.
The “Percentage Threshold” option would add I-1, Light Industrial District to the
permitted use land area, decrease the buffer zone to 275 feet from sensitive uses, create a
new base district (I-3) to avoid freeway exposure, and rezone freeway frontage parcels to
I-3. This option would yield about 236 acres and provide about 5.1% of the City’s net
usable land area for adult-oriented uses to locate. It is the most legally defensible option
and the preferred approach of the City Attorney’s office. Staff was concerned that the
creation of a new base zoning district, changes to the current base district, and rezoning
of several parcels would be confusing to the property owners, and cumbersome to
administer.
The “Number of Parcels” or “Overlay District” option would add I-I, Light Industrial
District to the permitted use land area, identify parcels that protect sensitive land uses,
identify parcels that avoid freeway frontage, create an overlay district to include eligible
parcels, and apply an overlay district to the subject parcels. This option provides for 43
individual parcels or approximately 3.5% of the City’s land area. Staff prefers the
“overlay district” approach because it avoids reconfiguring and rezoning base districts
for existing industrial properties, maintains a reasonable amount of opportunity for adult-
oriented uses, avoids freeway exposure, maintains a better separation overall from nearly
all existing sensitive use locations, and can be more easily manipulated in the future to
maintain reasonable opportunity and adjust for changing land use patterns.
Chairman Rod Dragsten opened the public hearing.
The Commissioners asked for clarification related to both options. Bill Spartz wondered
if anything could be done to protect the proximity en route to an elementary school near
Fallon. Rod Dragsten voiced a concern about vacancies within an office building. There
were a number of questions from the Commission as well as some discussion by the
Commission about making certain parcels ineligible and the option of increasing the
available area as the City grows.
Hearing no further public comment, the public hearing was closed.
BRAD FYLE MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ALTERNATIVE 2,
“NUMBER OF PARCELS” AND THE APPLICATION OF A “SPECIAL USE”
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT AS RECOMMENDED BY CITY STAFF AS AN
AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REVISING THE CITY’S ADULT-
ORIENTED ZONING RESTRICTIONS. MOTION WAS SECONDED BY BARRY
VOIGHT. MOTION CARRIED 4-1 WITH BILL SPARTZ OPPOSED.
Planning Commission Minutes – 04/05/11
3
Rod Dragsten also recommended the elimination of one parcel from consideration
involving an office building.
6. Consideration to call for a Public Hearing for the amendment of the Monticello
Zoning Ordinance: Chapter 2.4(B) for the initiation of Zoning Ordinance Text
and Map Amendments, Chapter 5.3(D) as related to the standards for Accessory
Structures in the M-H District, and Chapter 5.4 as related to the General and
Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
Staff requested that the Planning Commission call for a public hearing on May 3rd,
2011 for the purpose of consideration of additional code tracking amendments. The
amendments clarify existing components of the code, or are components of the
previous code that need to be incorporated into the new code. These
amendments are:
Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2.4(B)(2) for the initiation
of Zoning Ordinance Text and Map Amendments
This amendment would allow the Community Development Department to initiate
public hearing action consistent with the previous zoning ordinance.
Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5.3(D) as related to the
standards for Accessory Structures in the M-H District
This amendment would replace references to former R-4 district with “M-H” in all
locations.
Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5.4 as related to the
General and Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
1. This amendment would make placement of a construction dumpster outside of a
building permit an acceptable temporary use.
2. This amendment would define seasonal sales for fireworks or lawn displays as an
acceptable temporary use with an administrative permit.
Rod Dragsten noted that hoop type structures, generally utilized for seasonal
greenhouses, are subject to a 30-day limitation in the current code. Staff suggested that it
may be useful to consider making a language change to the code or an exemption for
wayside stands or farmer’s markets.
BILL SPARTZ MOVED TO CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 3, 2011
FOR CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING
ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 2.4, CHAPTER 5.3(d) AND CHAPTER 5.4. MOTION
WAS SECONDED BY CHARLOTTE GABLER. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
Planning Commission Minutes – 04/05/11
4
7. Consideration to appoint a Planning Commissioner to the Transportation Advisory
Committee
On March 14th, 2011, the City Council established a Transportation Advisory Committee
(TAC) to advise the Council and the Planning Commission on matters pertaining to the
planning, operation and improvement of our local transportation system consistent with
the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and for promoting a balanced, efficient and safe
transportation system for local residents, businesses and industry.
The TAC was approved with structure that provides a cross-section of stakeholders:
two City Council representatives, one Planning Commission representative, two IEDC
representatives, one EDA representative, and one resident at-large representative.
Chairman Rod Dragsten had previously served as Planning Commission liaison to the
BR&E Transportation Task Force.
CHARLOTTE GABLER MOVED TO APPOINT ROD DRAGSTEN AS PLANNING
COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO THE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY
COMMITTEE (TAC). MOTION WAS SECONDED BY BILL SPARTZ. MOTION
CARRIED 5-0.
8. Consideration to review progress on the Monticello Parks & Trails Plan
Staff provided a brief summary of the progress and participants involved in the review of
the Park and Trail Plan. The Parks Commission and MCC Advisory Council are kept
apprised of meetings, opportunities for input and action steps. Staff have met with school
district representatives and local athletic associations to obtain further input on the plan.
NAC will be working to coordinate downtown trail and park planning efforts as well as to
incorporate the concept sketch for the Bertram Chain of Lakes recreation area into the
draft plan. A community meeting regarding the draft plan will be scheduled for May.
Steve Grittman reported that survey results have been tabulated and will be provided to
the Planning Commission. The top parks noted in terms of usage were Bertram, MCC and
Ellison with East and West Bridge parks. The vast majority of respondents use the trail
system. The most noted requests were the extension of the trail system and water use
opportunities including improving access to and use of the river.
The City has authorized WSB to begin working on the GIS base park and trail layers, and
the development of a new online mapping interface to integrate, park, trail,
activity, history and point of interest information available to the public. Staff
demonstrated how the online component would function and be ready to use by June. The
website will be accessible by mobile phone as well.
Planning Commission Minutes – 04/05/11
5
9. 2011 Planning Commission Goals & Objectives
As part of continued efforts to accomplish the vision set out by the 2008 Comprehensive
Plan, the Planning Commission was asked to consider adoption of a set of Goals &
Objectives for 2011. Staff prepared a preliminary outline for Commission’s consideration
and offered the option of discussing these in a work session to ensure that all issues
included are understood and prioritized. The Commission agreed to conduct a work
session on Tuesday, May 17th at 6 p.m.
10. Community Development Director’s Report
There were a few questions related to the Citizen Service Desk. Staff noted that these
requests are routed to appropriate personnel and that all inquiries are responded to within
the goal of two working days. There were close to 400 inquiries in 2010. Building Official
Ron Hackenmueller responded to questions about the varied nature of the 65
blight/nuisance requests cited. He agreed to obtain a breakdown as to the percentage of
these which may be foreclosure related.
There have been three temporary sign permit applications since the int erim ordinance
was put in place in March.
11. Consideration of items added to the agenda
a) Wild & Scenic DNR Regulations
Staff reported that the City has separated and resubmitted the Shoreland and the Wild
& Scenic ordinances as directed by the regional DNR representative. The City has
incorporated initial DNR comments into the ordinances and is awaiting final comment
prior to preparing amendment language for the Planning Commission. Staff does not
expect a response from the DNR until June. Upon approval of these amendments, City
Emergency Management staff will meet with the DNR to consider flood plain
regulations.
12. Adjourn
BILL SPARTZ MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:53 PM. MOTION WAS
SECONDED BY BARRY VOIGHT. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
Recorder: Kerry T. Burri __
Approved: May 3, 2011
Attest: ___________________________________________
Planning Commission Minutes – 04/05/11
6
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
1
5. Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for Veterinary Facilities
(Neighborhood) and an amendment to Planned Unit Development for Monticello
Business Center 6th Addition/Quad Development. Applicant: Quad Development,
LLC (AS)
Property: Outlot A, Monticello Business Center 5th Addition
4300 School Boulevard
The subject site is located west of Walmart of east of the
Autumn Ridge Townhome development, on the south side
of School Boulevard.
Planning Case Number: 2011-010
REFERENCE & BACKGROUND
Request(s): Amendment to Planned Unit Development to allow the
construction of an approximately 7,680 square foot
commercial building and a Conditional Use Permit to
accommodate a Veterinary Facility.
Deadline for Decision: June 3rd, 2011 (60 days)
Land Use Designation: Places to Shop
Zoning Designation: B-4 (Regional Business)
The purpose of the B-4, regional business district, is to
provide for the establishment of commercial and service
activities which draw from and serve customers from the
entire community or region.
The proposed Phase II development for a Veterinary
Facility use requires a conditional use permit in the B-4
zoning district.
Current Site Use: The 4.5 acre site is currently platted into a single buildable
lot and a large outlot. Lot 1, Block 1 has been developed as
a two-story multi-tenant office building. The balance of the
property is vacant.
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
2
Surrounding Land Uses:
North: Vacant, zoned B-4
East: Residential, zoned R-3
Autumn Ridge development, Planned Unit Development
South: Commercial, zoned B-4
Walmart
West: Commercial, zoned B-4
Walmart
Project Description:
Quad Development is requesting an amendment to the approved Planned Unit
Development for Monticello Business Center 5th Addition to accommodate the
construction of an approximately 7,680 square foot commercial building as Phase II of
the approved Quad Development project. The amendment to PUD is required as the
applicant is seeking to change the footprint size of the building, the building design,
parking configuration, and landscaping treatments for the Phase II site.
The Phase II commercial building is intended for use as a veterinary facility, which
requires a Conditional Use Permit in the B-4 District.
The applicant also intends to re-plat a larger lot area than original illustrated on the
approved preliminary plat, which will be accomplished through the final plat process.
Planned Unit Development and Ordinance Requirements:
A Planned Unit Development allows for flexibility in performance standards with the
understanding that the development will be held to higher standards of site and building
design than would ordinarily be required. It is the applicant’s responsibility to design the
development with significant benefits and communicate those benefits to the City.
Parking. The original PUD approval required cross-easements for parking throughout
the site. The easements will be required to remain in place for the Phase II site
development and will be specifically addressed within a development contract for the
proposed re-plat.
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
3
In terms of parking requirements for the Phase II development, the proposed building
totals 7,680 square feet of gross floor area. The parking for the proposed uses is
calculated as follows.
Use Proposed Square
Footage
Code Requirement Required Spaces
Storage, Restrooms 938 sq. ft. 0 0 spaces
Kennel 844 sq. ft. 1 space per 400 sq ft 2 spaces
Clinic 5,897 sq. ft. 1 space per 250 sq ft 24 spaces
TOTAL REQUIRED SPACES 26 spaces
The provided site plan illustrates the limits of the parking to be constructed with Phase II.
The site plan includes12 existing spaces subject to the cross-easement, and the
construction of 22 additional spaces with the Phase II development. The City Engineer
has recommended that the applicant provide turning template information for larger
vehicles in order to ensure adequate circulation through the site when fully developed.
The parking configuration proposed is acceptable, subject to the cross-easement and
recommendation of the City Engineer.
Landscaping. The original landscaping plan for the Planned Unit Development exceeded
the requirements for commercial sites, providing 51 overstory trees and an intense
foundation planting plan for each building.
The overstory trees included a combination of four Emerald Lustre Maples, four Fallgold
Ash, five Sienna Glen Maples, four Skyline Honeylocusts, and five Swamp White Oaks.
The original PUD also included 7 Austrian Pines, 14 Black Hills Spruce, and 8 Colorado
Spruces. The majority of the overstory trees are proposed along the east property line, to
provide a buffer between the subject site and the townhome development to the east.
These trees have already been placed with the Phase I office building development.
The narrative provided by the veterinary clinic proposes a 3’ rock garden bed with a
mixture of low height coniferous and deciduous shrubs along with grasses and flowering
perennials. The suggested landscaping plan does not detail the exact species or quantity,
but will be required to meet or exceed the approved foundation landscaping plan. (See
page L2 of the approved PUD packet.)
The 32’ x 34’ dog exercise area on the south side of the property will be fully enclosed
and treated with masonry pillars of brick or cultured stone with a proposed 5’ fiberglass
privacy fence. This area will be further screened with dwarf spruce on the west and south
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
4
sides. The northern side yard will feature a synthetic turf area with additional landscape
plantings, but will not be enclosed.
In addition to the tree and shrub requirements, per the original PUD, sod is required
between the buildings and on the back side of each building. The applicant’s narrative
indicates that this requirement will be met.
As part of the original PUD, a plaza area is located at the entrance to the proposed
facility. Staff has verified that this area has been planted per the approved plan.
Lighting. A photometric plan was submitted for the original PUD. That plan indicates
that no glare exceeding one footcandle will spill over onto the adjacent right-of-way or
adjacent properties. The maximum footcandle reading along the east property line,
adjacent to Autumn Ridge, is 0.2. Any wall mounted lighting shall require a full cutoff
fixture. A photometric plan compliant with the original approval will be required at
building permit.
Signage. The front facades of the one story plus mezzanine buildings were proposed at
3,620 square feet each. Under the original PUD, each of these buildings was allowed 181
square feet of signage. The applicant is proposing approximately 105 square feet of wall
signage for the building. The applicant has indicated that sign placement will be on the
north side for the building, facing School Boulevard. Final building elevations will be
required to include placement and sizing of all wall signage.
In addition to wall signage, the original PUD approval included two monument signs, one
in the northeast corner of the site and one in the northwest corner of the site. These signs
will contain placards for up to six tenants. Said signs are each 96 square feet in area and
15.33 feet in height, for a total of 192 square feet of signage. The veterinary clinic has
indicated that they will be included within the existing pylon signage and no separate
free-standing signage is proposed for the site.
Building Design. The original Planned Unit Development illustrated an 8,400 square
foot building footprint. This application for amendment to PUD indicates instead a 7,680
square foot building. The smaller building is shifted slightly eastward to accommodate
changes in building design.
The original PUD proposed five buildings, including both one and half (mezzanine) and
two story structures, all similar in design and materials. The proposed PUD amendment
would vary from the approved design and materials.
The narrative and preliminary elevation states that a variety of materials, including
Hardie-board siding, stone, and pre-formed steel or aluminum will be used on the
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
5
building exterior. A draft building elevation drawing has also been provided. However,
the veterinary clinic has indicated that the final design will include additional façade
detail and window fenestration beyond what is shown on the draft. The applicant will
provide a colored elevation at the Commission meeting.
The applicant will be required to submit a final building elevation design illustrating final
materials and location placement consistent with the code requirements below and
compatibility with the original PUD.
1. No galvanized or unfinished steel, galvalum, or unfinished aluminum buildings,
except those specifically designed to have a corrosive designed finish such as
corten steel, shall be permitted in the districts listed herein.
2. Buildings in these zoning districts shall maintain a high standard of architectural
and aesthetic compatibility with conforming surrounding properties to ensure that
they will not adversely impact the property values of the abutting properties and
shall have a positive impact on the public health, safety, and general welfare,
insofar as practicable.
3. Exterior building finishes in the districts subject to this Section shall consist of
materials compatible in grade and quality to the following:
(a) Brick
(b) Natural Stone
(c) Decorative rock face or concrete block
(d) Cast-in-place concrete or pre-cast concrete panels
(e) Wood, provided that the surfaces are finished for exterior use and wood of
proven exterior durability is used, such as cedar, redwood, or cypress
(f) Glass
(g) Exterior Insulated Finish systems, where said system is manufactured to
(h) replicate the look of one of the approved building materials in this section
(i) Stucco
4. Metal exterior finishes shall be permitted only where coordinated into the overall
architectural design of the structure, such as in window and door frames, mansard
roofs or parapets, and other similar features, and in no case shall constitute more
than 15% of the total exterior finish of the building.
Access and Circulation. The overall Planned Unit Development site has one access
point extending south from School Boulevard. The access is 40 feet in width, excluding
the island, with adequate space for turn lanes. All internal drive lanes are proposed at 24
feet in width, wide enough to accommodate two-way traffic. A cross-access easement
document shall be provided to the City, verifying that the lot to be platted shall have
access to School Boulevard.
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
6
Pedestrian access will be accommodated by a concrete sidewalk running along the front
the building. A crosswalk, as originally approved, will connect the east side of the site to
the west side of the site.
Grading and Drainage. The Phase II development will proceed in accordance with
previously approved grading plans. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans in
relationship to the proposed site plan and has provided comments. Comments from the
City Engineer may be found attached as Exhibit H.
Utilities. The Phase II development will proceed in accordance with previously approved
utility plans. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans in relationship to the proposed
site plan and has provided comments. Comments from the City Engineer may be found
attached as Exhibit H.
Conditional Use Permit Requirements
Neighborhood Veterinary Facilities are permitted as conditional uses in the B-4 District.
To follow is an analysis of the request per the conditional use permit requirements.
1. Treatment shall be limited to small household pets unless the facility is
conditionally permitted as a rural veterinary facility.
The applicant has indicated that the veterinary facility will offer services to small
domestic animals only.
2. In the CCD district, animals shall only be housed overnight if they are
undergoing medical treatment or observation. Overnight boarding for
nonmedical reasons shall be prohibited.
Not applicable. It is noted that the narrative indicates that boarding facilities will
be provided to clients of the veterinary clinic.
3. The site shall be designed to prevent animal waste from being exposed to
stormwater or entering the stormwater system, streams, lakes, or conveyances.
The applicant’s narrative indicates that staff on-site will manage waste and will
dispose of in appropriate facilities. The City Engineer made specific comment
relative to the storm water system.
4. If an area is provided for animals walking, it shall not be exposed to stormwater
and the waste shall immediately be picked up and disposed of properly.
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
7
The applicant’s narrative indicates that staff on-site will manage waste and will
dispose of in appropriate facilities.
The applicant narrative indicates that two outdoor exercise areas will be provided.
The first exercise area is proposed for the south side of the principal building and
is approximately 32’ x 34’ in area.
The second outdoor area is proposed for the north side of the facility and will be
surfaced with artificial turf.
5. Animals shall not be kept outdoors or be allowed to remain outside unsupervised.
The applicant narrative indicates that two outdoor fenced exercise areas will be
constructed. Animals will be allowed in these areas during daytime hours and
will be leashed when outside of fully enclosed areas. Conditions listed in
Exhibit Z prohibit the overnight kenneling of animals outdoors.
6. All animals must be leashed.
The applicant narrative states that animals will be leashed when outside, with the
exception of the fully enclosed exercise area.
7. No outside storage of carcasses.
No mention of this condition was made in the applicant narrative, but is listed as a
condition of approval within Exhibit Z.
8. The facility shall be subject to an annual inspection by a City Health Officer at
owner's expense.
The City’s Animal Control officer will complete an annual inspection and submit
a report to be filed with Conditional Use permit.
Accessory Use Requirements
Trash Handling. The trash handling enclosure serving the site is subject to the
following code standards:
1. The location and configuration of screening for large trash handling and
recycling collection areas shall be depicted on all required landscaping plans.
The provided Suggested Landscape Plan illustrates the location of the enclosure
along the south side of the facility.
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
8
2. Large trash handling and recycling collection areas shall be fully screened from
adjacent properties.
The applicant has indicated that the trash handling will be fully enclosed with a
maintenance-free vinyl fence. The final elevation drawings for this area shall be a
requirement of the final site/building elevation plan.
3. In cases where access to large trash handling and recycling face a public right-
of-way, the access way shall be screened with an opaque gate. Chain link shall
not be used for such gates.
The trash enclosure will be serviced from the interior (east-facing) side and will
not face a right of way. The applicant has indicated that the gates will also be
constructed of maintenance-free vinyl.
4. Compactors that are attached to the principal structure shall be totally screened
from eye level view from public streets and adjacent nonindustrial properties by a
screening wall constructed of the same building material as the principal
structure.
Not applicable.
5. Large trash handling and recycling shall meet the required setbacks for
structures as required in the underlying zoning district.
The B-4 District has a 0’ lot line setback and as such, the proposed location meets
the required setback.
6. In all cases, large trash handling and recycling collection areas shall be at least
six feet from a side or rear lot line, and shall not be located within front yards or
corner side yards.
The proposed site plan illustrates compliance with this requirement.
7. If a wall or detached accessory structure is used to screen or define a large trash
handling and recycling collection area, the building materials used for the wall or
accessory structure shall be compatible with the principal structure and be
readily served through swinging doors.
The proposed material for the enclosure is a maintenance-free vinyl in a color
compatible with the principal building. Final elevations for the enclosure shall be
a requirement of the final building elevation plan.
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
9
8. Areas intended for large trash handling and recycling collection areas shall be
surfaced with concrete that meets or exceeds minimum City standards.
This shall be a requirement of the final building plan.
9. Eating establishments and other uses that produce significant amounts of liquid
waste shall configure areas intended for large trash handling and recycling
collection areas to drain to the sanitary sewer system through grease traps or
similar devices as required by the Community Development Department.
Not applicable.
Retail Sales. The applicant’s narrative indicates that a limited amount of retail sales will
occur on site. The zoning ordinance allows retail sales as a permitted accessory use for
office facilities in a B-4, subject to the following:
1. All sales are conducted indoors within a clearly defined area of the principal
building reserved exclusively for retail sales. Said sales area must be physically
segregated from other principal activities in the building.
2. The retail sales area must be located on the ground floor of the principal building.
3. Sales Area. The retail sales activity shall not occupy more than fifteen (15)
percent of the gross floor area of the building.
The applicant has indicated their intent to comply with these conditions.
Plat Standards
Final Plat. The subject site is currently platted as Outlot A of the Monticello Business
Center 5th Addition. The applicant is proposing to final plat a portion of the existing
outlot for the Phase II site as Lot 1, Monticello Business Center 6th Addition.
This replat will create a lot larger than that proposed under the preliminary plat. The
preliminary plat platted only the building footprint for each of the five buildings, with the
balance of the property platted as an outlot. The proposed verterinary clinic seeks to own
a larger area outside of the building footprint in order to accommodate their use needs on
the building perimeter. The development contract for Phase II will address the proposed
lot’s relationship to the balance of the site for maintenance purposes and cross-easement
documents will be required to accommodate parking and access configuration as
proposed.
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
10
Under City Ordinance, final plat review and approval occurs at City Council. The
applicant intends to submit their re-plat/final plat on or before May 3rd for the review and
approval of the proposed Monticello Business Center 6th Addition.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Decision 1: Resolution of Recommendation for Amendment to Conditional Use
Permit for Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit for Veterinary
Facility (Neighborhood)
1. Motion to approve Resolution 2011-36 recommending approval of the
amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for
Monticello Business Center 5th Addition and Conditional Use Permit for
Veterinary Facility for the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Business Center
6th Addition, contingent on compliance with those conditions specified in
Exhibit Z.
2. Motion to deny Resolution 2011-36 recommending approval of an amendment to
Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for Monticello Business
Center 5th Addition and the Conditional Use Permit for Veterinary Facility for the
proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Business Center 6th Addition, based on
findings to be made by the Planning Commission.
3. Motion to table action on the request for amendment to Conditional Use Permit
for Planned Unit Development for Monticello Business Center 5th Addition and
Conditional Use Permit for Veterinary Facility for the proposed Lot 1, Block 1,
Monticello Business Center 6th Addition
STAFF RECOMMNDATION
Subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z, staff recommends approval of the
Conditional Use Permit and amendment to Planned Unit Development. The proposed
use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with Zoning regulations for the
property, subject to compliance with the stated conditions.
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
11
SUPPORTING DATA
A. Aerial Image
B. Applicant Narrative
C. Landscape Description
D. Suggested Landscaping Plan
E. Exterior Finishes & Parking Description
F. Building Elevation Material Examples
G. Site Plan
H. Draft Elevations
I. Floor Plan
J. Approved Plans – Quad Development PUD (9/4/2007)
K. City Engineer’s Comment Letter, dated 4/26/11
L. Resolution 2011-36
Z. Conditions of Approval
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
12
Exhibit Z – Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit for Veterinary Facility and
Amendment to Planned Unit Development
Outlot A, Monticello Business Center 5th Addition – Proposed as Lot 1, Block 1,
Monticello Business Center 6th Addition
1. The area provided for animals shall not be exposed to stormwater and the waste shall
immediately be picked up and disposed of properly.
2. Animals shall not be kept outdoors overnight or be allowed to remain outside unsupervised.
3. All animals must be leashed.
4. No outside storage of carcasses shall be permitted.
5. The facility shall be subject to an annual inspection by a City Health Officer at owner's expense.
6. The applicant shall submitted final building elevations with specified materials consistent with
code requirements and compatible with the original PUD.
7. The applicant shall submit a site plan/building elevation plan illustrating the following:
a. The location and configuration of landscaping of screening for large trash handling and
recycling collection areas.
b. Large trash handling and recycling shall be at least six feet from a side or rear lot line,
and shall not be located within front yards or corner side yards.
c. If a wall or detached accessory structure is used to screen or define a large trash handling
and recycling collection area, the building materials used for the wall or accessory
structure shall be compatible with the principal structure and be readily served through
swinging doors.
d. Areas intended for large trash handling and recycling collection areas shall be surfaced
with concrete that meets or exceeds minimum City standards.
e. Final building design, materials and color consistent with the code requirements
below and compatibility with the original PUD.
f. Sign placement and size.
Planning Commission Agenda – 05/03/11
13
8. The applicant shall submit a detailed landscaping plan illustrating the following:
a. The number and species of plantings in order to verify compliance with the original PUD
and base landscaping code requirements.
b. The location, number, species and configuration of landscaping for large trash handling
and recycling collection areas.
9. A photometric plan compliant with the original approval will be required at building permit.
10. A cross-access easement document shall be provided to the City, verifying that Lot 1, Block 1 of
the proposed Monticello Business Center shall have direct access to School Boulevard and to
PUD parking facilities.
11. The applicant shall comply with the comments per City Engineer’s memo dated April 26th, 2011.
12. The approval is subject to the re-plat and execution of Development Agreement for Monticello
Business Center 6th Addition.
QUAD DEVELOPMENT
CONTRACTOR;
5GOTT BUILDERS
12 DIVISION 5TiREET
BUFFALO, MINNE50TA 55313
tel.: (163) b84-0000
Fax: 063) 684-0402
contact: Reck Scott
NEW BUILDINGS.
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
ARCHITECT:
H.T.6. Al2(HITEGT5
9300 14ENNEPIN TOWN ROAD
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNE50TA 55341
Led-- (152) 2"18-8850
Fax: M52).21&-15522
Contort: Tom Moor5e
DRAWING INDEX
T5 TIRE 5HEET, DRAWING INDEX, d PROJECT DATA
GI EA571W, 6ONDIT10% SURVEY
62 PRELIMINARY RAT
CIVIL ENGINEER:
ANDERSON ENGINEE-RIN6
f3bbO5 15T AVENUE NORTH, SUfTE 100
PLYMOUTH, 4NNE50TA 55441
tel,: (163) 383-1054
Fax: (Ib3) 383-1081
Gontoct: Mark Joster
LAN05CAPE ENGINEER:
MARKELL-LABERGE DE516N GROUP
t5 EIRENTWOOD AVE.
EXGEL510R, MN 55331
Lei.! 952-414-2260
Fax: 152-414-0155
Contact: Scott Morotz
VICINITY MAP
0
LEGEND: NORTH
(P XTIMUTE i8 STATE MMY O CMariGYM * fRaELT LXATY,N
MATERIAL 5YME01-5
Ki/ STRE
FINAL PIAT
G3
GRADING, DRAIWE 1 ER05ION PLAN
C4
511E UTILITY PLAN
G5
CAN5TRUGTIOR DETAILS
G6
GON5TRUGTON DETAIL5
LI
LAN05CAPE PLAN
1-2
LANOSGAPE PLAN
AIJ
517E PLAN
Al2
PHOTOMETRIC LIGHTING PLAN
A2.r
FLOOR PLANS - 15TORY R MEZZANINE
A2.2
FLOOR PLA16 - THO 5TORY
A3J
EXTERIOR ELEVATION5
A32
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A4J
516N PLAN
CIVIL ENGINEER:
ANDERSON ENGINEE-RIN6
f3bbO5 15T AVENUE NORTH, SUfTE 100
PLYMOUTH, 4NNE50TA 55441
tel,: (163) 383-1054
Fax: (Ib3) 383-1081
Gontoct: Mark Joster
LAN05CAPE ENGINEER:
MARKELL-LABERGE DE516N GROUP
t5 EIRENTWOOD AVE.
EXGEL510R, MN 55331
Lei.! 952-414-2260
Fax: 152-414-0155
Contact: Scott Morotz
VICINITY MAP
0
LEGEND: NORTH
(P XTIMUTE i8 STATE MMY O CMariGYM * fRaELT LXATY,N
MATERIAL 5YME01-5
Ki/ STRE
O LSD eLXKM
WIN 1i4TT.lE LATZ4
-�� FY.E ER"
O IMR)I. MY I= 6LOC,KM
® fJEAD II:sAA.k"
OP`1:RET6 61MK (F,FU]
/�% rw H=
Pi wxv
F�-1 ukl'.R MWfLMT
MIR EARTH
++
11 I I Accts m
O 6YPriH 6OM0 OR A,-6THt
rm SLAIV OR ORAVEL
-E
owm
.�� 6x7. DM. 4 F0e5F*Y5TEM
PATME WMv
/ 5TRd1. RRAL 51TH. OR VITAL 5TTA5
A��
,l R( HI TE(3 TS
w w w. h tg -a rc h I t e ots , e o m
9300 Hennepin Town Road
Eden Pralria, MN 55347
Tel: 952,278.8880 Fax; 952.278.8822
cOPYRi6NT 0 Za07 bI NT6 Arc88eas
PROJECT
QUAD
DEVELOPMENT
NEW BUILDINGS
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
ISSUED SET 09dd-07 PNEL"IllklYPLAT
8E11510NS
DATE 10.
HIM
BLOM R M
H DWEM SF=
BWA14 MN M3
FACIND 70,24-M
I HEREBY COMFY THAT TMS FLAX
SPEODUTIOB OR RPAOBr WAS PR£PAR£o BY
TAE DR UHOfR yr DIRfoT SUPfBI K41 No
THAr I Ay ADULY fKEBSfD ARQOT[CF
MR THE IA/ S V TBE STATE OF
MINNESCTw
..IAME� 6ROVER
121 , 09/Over
REG. RD. DATE
TITLE SHEET, DRAWING INDEX,
& PROJECT DATA
'SEP ~'4 200
DWIM AAT aromar. 78}1
TS4�
i^ 9i SIB]%
SURVEY FOR: SCOTT BUILDERS
/ / 1
PROPERTY ADDRESS: School Boulevard, Monticello, Minnesota.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Outlet A, MONTICELLO BUSINESS �; _JI • r
CENTER 3RD ADDITION
CERi1FICATTON: ��,� .�•' 1 _ J # .p/
hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stote of Minnesota. % / /' / _�\ \� \ '\_ # '{# L m •"a.
Doted: May 31, 2007 / /,� / /
JI I
Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC / <'!' i /' f / y
Jack Balks / / -I `I p' # °
Minnesota License No. 20281 L 1 I f I _ / /,# / K,
NOTES: /
-4,
1. The orientation of this bearing system d based on the / ,�,,,.,�
of
south No line of Outlot A which is assumed to have o bearing
of North 54 degrees 10 minutes 10 seconds West
1 / \. °0.+¢°'^s• •, ��^
2. The area of the property shown hereon Is 196,028 square
feet or 450D acres.
.
3. No title work was provided for the preparation of this
survey to verify the legal description or the existence of
any easements or encumbrances. 1
4. According the City of Monticello, the subject property / /! /
Is zoned B-- 4 Regional Business and has no setback '�- // �� `la t
requirements. It is recommended that the property owner / / F;,�,
obtain o zoning letter from the City to verify all
conditions that affect the property through the city
zoning ordinance. This survey does not purport to a ��� �`� \ # o / /�of /f M _�� °� (J•-> T \`\ \ \ € \ \ cc* ° h /s / /
describe all conditions contained in said ordinance.
5. The location and extent of underground utilities, if shown, / �� -�� -�,\� \\� r +) A' �j / ,r- %� \�� "�-v,\\. ` ?
are based upon existing drawings provided by the utility /`��\�\�, \ . ` 111 '/� �" J � \ d{
companies and by above ground evidence. There is no ` \ /I Jr/ ° / �`j 4'a
guarantee as to the accuracy or the completeness of this \ \ II / �I w /-.�_ �� --Z
information. The size and location should be considered -d / ! Its $ f \ ".o l\ g
approximate. Additional underground utilities may be , iJ ° ��S,T \ql, �_� (� e / ,•, _
present. Vershould
be t the existence and location of all
utilities should be obtained from the utility Mprior to 1 •� __ ��__ .—___\ �_-___- g \ le /
any planning or design. Iaccordance with Minnesota
u
Statute, the location of utilities shall be confirmed prior to / ::� ' 1 �\ �•�\1 i _��� '�,_- '+ r /
any demolition or construction.
6. The tree information shown hereon was collected during
field survey in non-forestry trained Anderson
En
Engineering of Minnesota survey personnel. Tree sizes are _
estimated; locations ore accurate to plus or minus three / %` - _ �- � oEp`
feet; and the tree count Is within opproximotely / / \ \ 1
ninety-five percent. O '�_ 'tel, t}5�7�- "�` - �'�"• L _.� J / / ;`r•I Q
7. BENCHMARK: Top nut elevation of fire hydrant at % r
northwest corner of Outlot A= 909.1 feet.
-jy.
13
TREE LEGEND LEGEND11 1
O FENCE 1
MANHOLE — \ % -
-FF1vl>t / � F
DENOTES 2" ASH 0 CATCH BASIN =--OVERHEAD VIRES
•° DENOTES 4' BASSWOOD a HYDRANT —-UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE e f 7!
1 DENOTES 4' BIRCH + SIGN--SANt7ARY SEWER / r
DENOTES 4- CEDAR
DENOTES 4` GATE VALVE —STORM SEWER / 1
ORNAMENTAL o GAS METER ---GAS MAIN
DENOTES 2' PINE A POWER POLE —*—WATER MAIN
DENOTES 2" SPRUCE a TELEPHONE BOX m ELECTRIC BOX
• DENOTE5 FOUND IRON fiONUMENTA7IDN
/ I 0 50 100
S I
I l SCALE IN FEET
I i
WAsT
I
It !
41
4-07 CITY APPROVAL RECORD SET/PERMIT SET DESIGNED-
•7-07 OWNER APPRAISAL RETNMtI Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC QUAD DEVELOPMENT NEW BUILDINGS GoMH. No. F
2-07 RENStD PER OWNERY PLAN
RENEW DRAWN: �I/'1 11854
2-07 REEIMI PAEIIMIN F PLAN FOR CITY SORFA7TAL NNIH CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING MON I II.ELL Oa MINNESOTA EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY DRAWING NO.
4-07 PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR CITY SUBMITTAL taeei 1.1 AVXN16 NORI31. ben& yap, PLYYp H TG ARCHITECTS, INC.
CHECKED BY: tmr, yet s56S3 C1
IA7E DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS DGA TM (]63) 4f2-4opo FAX (7831 41¢-splxt
I
MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 4TH ADDITION
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY BASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS!
I6 6I
Jb b�
BERG b FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING LOT
UNES UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND 12
FEET IN W91H AND All.1 M14G STREET
UNES AS SHOWN ON THE PIAT.
I I R In A/T
I �Civi��tz Jfl/n nn
i v ^ 41
U7t /VLAY
II
l D�
It
ZONED B4
M �
i / 3
lfIt
WAL
U A R T
ZONED B4
LL -u
lilt
`' BUILDING 0'v
;111
it
J ,� it our -.o' �],
! l(A F ; ! '77 6' - _ r
z J r J 1 Jalp
Lj
o TLor 1 'DAT ASE i\ d 1 jr7� '�"—� _ ,I Y r I�
T I! 1 i r P ��
� Q � � ' I � JJ� j j FUTURE PHASE
I �`- J3 -L' f-�"`4`-..--�,
fjJ1 T D P L1
LL
N-�-��
FL P14A __-.:
<. FUTU(TWIRE LOT UNES _ __ _ 'H'FY'b11 PA - _ - - _ - _ _ _ __ vY Div"'
F�iNc
BUILDING FOUR I LJ BUILDING FIVE — R22.II
\Y�J 111 I LOT 1
85005E — -- — —
�
_ I
N ------
451- - - - -- -— 696.35 ---- � �----—--- - -_ -/-
l
��1
ZONED PZ -M
TO'aT�W1Es
1�,
L_L,,,�_1 ;E,'i_�
/
m /
!/
, ZONED B4
_ u�l
c j rc^
o�
s
0
SCALE IN FEET
PROPERTY ADDRESS
SCHOOL BLVD, MONTICELLO, NR
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OUTLOTA, MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 3RD ADDITION.
%RIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
SITE DATA
P.I.D.: 155-169-ODJ010
E%ISIWG ZONING = B-4 REGIONAL BUSINESS
LOT AREA = 196,028 S (4.500 AC.)
HENONMARN: TIP NUT D-EVATION OF RNE HYDRANT
AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF OLFILOT A= 969.1 FEET.
SE SACKS
SAME AS DRAINAGE A: DTUTY EASEMENT UNES
OWNER
OCELLO LLC
4065 CHELSEA RD W.
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
APPLICANT
QUAD DEVELOPMENT
C/O SCOTT BUILDERS
12 DIVISION STREET
BUFFALO, MN 55313
RICK SCOTT
753.604.0000
ARCHITECTS
HTG ARCHITECTS, INC,
9300 HENNEPIN TOWN ROAD
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347
TOM MOORSE
957-278.SBBO
ENGINEER:
ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF
MINNESOTA, LLC
13605 IST AVE N SUITE 100
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441
MARK T. JASTER, R.E.
763.412.4000
SURVEYOR:
ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF
MINNESOTA, LLC
13605 1ST AVE N SUITE 100
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441
JACK BOLKE, LS.
763.412.4000
......
4 R -7-a71 OWNER APPRAISAL SET
-
IATJ
II Emtar axnrr THAT Tws w.v, SPEfFTCA1ICN. a+ repair wAs
I MLY�umt�pRq�ID CNpj p,Epj1EER UN T THE LAWS THE
Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC
QUAD DEVELOPMENT—NEW BUILDINGS
COMM. N0, PLOTTED:
11854
3
7-16-07 REV9Sm PER OWNER/ARCNITECT REVIEW
DRAWN'
STATE OF LIDT8 &
2
7-2-67 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR CIN SUBMITTAL
T14i
PRINT NAME. 14ARK T JASTER. PE
C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G A N D L A N D SURVEYING
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT
DRAINNG NO.
1
6-4-07 PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR CITY SUBMITTAL
CHECKED BY:
SIGNATURE:
lad" let AYCNNN NORTH, s ym lo0. PLYNoUTTI. RH 5seeT
HTG ARCHITECTS INC.
C2
NO.
OATS DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS
DATE UNE 4 2007 U�5E j 4GS34
TSL (T&9) u -Ao FAY (1431 412-4oao
MONTICELLO BUSINESS- CENTER 4TH ADDITION
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Scott Builders, a Minnesota Company, fee owner of the following described property situate In
the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit:
OuVot A 1ADNTICEIL0 BUSINESS CENTER 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plot thereof, Wright County: Minnesota
In witness whereof sold Scott Builders, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20D�
Signed: Scott Builders.
by its
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
The foregcing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
200— by , of Scott Builders, a Mlnresota Company, on behalf of the Company.
Notary Public, County,
My Commission Expires:
I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as MONTICELL BUSINESS CENTER 4TH ADDITION:
that this plot is a correct representation of sold survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plot In feet and hundredths of
a foot• that all monuments have been correctly placed In the ground as shown, or will be placed asrequired by the local government
unit, that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat; and that there are no wet lands os defined In MS 505.02
subd. 1, or public highways to be designated other than shown.
Jack Balks, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 20281
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF BRIGHT
The foregoing surveyors certiRcate was acknowledged before me this day of 200— by
Jack Bdke, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 20281
Notary Public, County, Minnesota,
My Commission Expires:
This plat of MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 4111 ADDITION was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello.
Minnesota at a meeting held this day of , 200,
By. Chairperson
This plat of MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 4TH ADDITION won approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello,
Minnesota at a meeting held this day of , 200—
By.
Mayor By.
, City Administrator
Examined and recommended for approval this day of 200._.
By.
Wright County Surveyor
Taxes paid for oil years through year and transfer entered this day of 200_,
By.
Wright County Auditor
1 hereby certify that taxes payable In the year on lands herein described are paid this day of
206—.
By.
Wright County Treasurer
I hereby certify that this Instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this day of
, 200_., at o clock M, and was duly recorded in Cabinet Sleeve
Sids _ , as Document Number
BY Wright County Recorder
A A /l A l 7— 1 /% T'
IVr t1 1 v 1 1 v L_
� a.Inn1'rr/�r-r i n
\ IVIlJ1V 11vL_L_L.L/
`� vL_! V 1 L_I l
8
A 1 7 T 1 1 A A o f
r1 U I U IVI 1 V
o DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT
SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 20281
• DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH 13Y 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT
N
A fti f -'11I -T- r n n I W
n U L/ I i I U 1 V 141,
S
0 50 100 150
SCALE IN FEET
1 INCH - 50 FEET
Anderson Engineering ofMinnesota, LLC
Cl VIL 811 G I N E R R I R G A R D LA ND . SURVEYING
I
A ry
r1 !1
11
.LJ
I
I
T
I
! rl
I U
1
n i
1 v% 1
I
l
\
N
A fti f -'11I -T- r n n I W
n U L/ I i I U 1 V 141,
S
0 50 100 150
SCALE IN FEET
1 INCH - 50 FEET
Anderson Engineering ofMinnesota, LLC
Cl VIL 811 G I N E R R I R G A R D LA ND . SURVEYING
I
A ry
r1 !1
11
.LJ
I
I
T
I
! rl
I U
1
n i
1 v% 1
I
l
N
A fti f -'11I -T- r n n I W
n U L/ I i I U 1 V 141,
S
0 50 100 150
SCALE IN FEET
1 INCH - 50 FEET
Anderson Engineering ofMinnesota, LLC
Cl VIL 811 G I N E R R I R G A R D LA ND . SURVEYING
NOTES:
1. TOPOGRAPHY @ SATE SURVEY BY ANDERSON ENG(mm NC OF MN. Um.
f I ; 2 ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY VATH RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOIL
ENGINEER UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. 2
7. ALL CONSTRUCTION SMALL COMPLY 4NTN CRY OF MOHR5iL0 IXCIHFfRC1C t• ��
STANDARDS NID T!ff 2005 FDInON OF MNDOT STANDARD CONS,RUCRON s
I ,, AjiI I 1 + 1 I \\_ , \� S'EdFlCAnQVS (INCLUDING SUPPLEMENTS) UNLVaS DIRECTED OTHERWISE, SCALE W FEET
' f I f II t \ �.\\ \\ ` 4. ALL CO1STItUCnON SHALL COAfPLY WTH APPILCABLE MU CZ
\ j WATERSHED D)STRICT, COUNTY, MPCA, DEPT. OF HEALTH, AND MNOOT
�` i ( ) '1i \ PERMITS.
A 5. ALL HANDICAPPED STALL NACCESS RAUPS SHALL COMPLY
CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. SEE ARCHITECTURAL ATH
PLANS FOR EXACT
WA L A l
LocanM ofFN
SWLOWC R2AHLES, IV/
_ 6 ARE FORkn0N AND 0ENFRAL INFORMAT7OI E or Em�D:iLTHE
YmTHEINEOROMAnON s H
-- - �- --' i
_ ; 1 v i I A ! a f r< WARRANTED TO BE AMMATE OR COMPLETE EHE COi{TRAOT IN
-\\
COOPER CN ATH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITYCATOI COMPANY 7H MU AUTY,
_ '(-' _ (' s �I )J _ IS RFSPONSELE FDR VEfMMRG THE LDCAnON AND DWRI OF �\\ - __ 60 '
a UNDERGROUND UTLOIE& ' \ ��-.,. \ , m V /
wM �, - �^ <-`'m°`.'6a � \mac \\\_ HB'• \�'�\\��\\�.. ,. /- _.___ �� +„ d i'l � A
1---'` -�I _----- - ___-( - ,Ai.p_ .y -Y • gyWe -----------
M.VD 8ir4Y,N '`9' -�j3 f 0
14
sz
Y " - Y W'►r`a �'�� Wv.9ss.a < cry .aaL•.a g _�` / / a
1 ` -_11
i-�+ �� SILT FENCE
�/I j a�
�E=ggY
Y
' 4BUIL
DINGN�CX. ORAINACF IND
' _ ,�' i +1 'x• `` `'J '\ �z, � ___ _ 5 EA NEN7�__�y� �.{ - �U� X.6,
n CC F{
`a
r
f 1IN,
FENCE _ _
(TYP.)'.1 <>__ - _F�-"� s O,.FUTURE
t / r _ Bas "� �•_ 0 1 PHASE 1 .l ! :-� R / m m /
965—
- B
----------- --- --- - - - - - - 0-
i fl-tj
I71
-I ST -N AI
' BI P N t+ J
1 �V
n ' i i u PER DETAIL (TYP. A 1
r �6
,bn i! f 1' \` FUTURE PHASE i E�HASE 1
rf J ,1
�
to
S ! p • Y ,� I I W I
7 .
---- ----------
--_---�FFfis--------- BUILDING FOUR--- ��t _ BUILDING
FIVE _
_
- -—__-______E —___— ___--
----- .0 1R
INSTALL & MAINTAIN
TEM ORARY ROCK
-
'
° --_ _ CONSTRUCTION
l l r
NSD
ENTRANCE
PER DETAIL __ _
-- ---
---`, _
SlLT FENCE - - g,, o'I
(TVP.)( 1
s t �I
T1,
I
_ T - \ n i- �' I ill ' - '_y - V \�-�_-� � $� � ``/♦9 I`� T / }
f 3$iAl� ' ,`J� , • ra -\ o E `T` ' \ Z_ .'I ; t a�; I v I I \ I I I - �, \ /T = _\/� 5 �9P P� p`;.f ''l I ' _ S�e 1
TOWNHOIAES / �\ "X •'/ \i l �L;
Al
m 1
9-4-071 CITY APPROVAL RECORD SET/PERMIT SET DESIGNED: I xwwr cFxmY THAr TIUS PUR 3+EaNCARa+ OR REPORT WAS
8-7-07 REM APPRAISAL SET MTJ AROULY� B OR I`E6sslo AL MY s w Un D,;, Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC QUAD DEVELOPMENT NEW BUILDINGSGRADING,
CONAM. NO. PLOTim:
7-16-07 REVISED PER OWNER/ARO4TECT REVTEW STATE W WvIflmTA. GRADING rR'�
°R""" DRAINAGE &7-2-07 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN FCR CITY 9JBAlITTAL PRINT NAME MARK T. JASTER C]YIL EN GIN£BRING AND T,AND SURVRYING ,6-4-07 PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR CITY SUBMITTAL C , MINNESOTAPSH CELLO WNG NO,
DAVE DESCRIPNON OF REVISONS CHECKED FLY: DATE E: 19806 Nei EL (7 s 41V- 000 FAX
loo, PLT5+0,13M. 101 5594[ EROSION CONTROL PLAN
DATE .UNE A 2007 LICENSE a 40931 SSL (Y&9T 912-4000 FA%(�6O) 912-1090 HTG ARCHITECTS, INC.
C3
f
NOTES;
1. TOPOGRAPHY & SITE SURVEY BY ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MN, LLC.
j '
1 r
L04PLY MSE. REC041UENOATIONS OF THE SpL
I 2 ALL CONSTRUCTION DIRECTED
ENGINEER UNLESS DIRECTED O NER NSE
3. ALL CONSTRUC71ON SHALL COMPLY WT1 CITY OF MONTICELLO ENGINEERING
STANDARDS AND TiE 2005 EDITION OF NNDOT STANDARD CONSTRUCTION
Z
4
SPECIFICATIONS (INCLUDING SUPPLEMENTS) UNLESS DIRECTED
m
T
OT{ERW15E.
4. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CCiLPLY N1Ti APPUCAgLE L1UNIpPAL,
SCALE IN FEET
.Y
v r h WATERSHED DISTRICT, COVNI . MPC& DEPT- OF HEALTH, AND LNDOT
i ! 1 A gpp PE7WI7S
'�
CURRALL ENT PADA ST NDARDSALLS '�SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANSD ACCESS RAMPS SMALL SFF COMPLY
EXACT WA
LDCAn0M OF BUILDING ENTRANCES. q
i 1 S. THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF 1ON OEXISTING UTILITIES DR"A ON THE \\ `- / /
f ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. THE RffCRNAnON 75 /
WARRANTED TO BE ACCURATE OR COMFLElE THE CONTRACT IN \� �\\\� {{{
CDOPERA11ON WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTWN COIJPANY OR IAU- AIJTY ���\�, J v / B°
J1 i IS RESPONSIBLE FCR YOU"
UNDERGROUND UTLOCATIONC THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF
\\\\\\\
II f » jII r Twos -SI �,\_ MAINEAIN 7.5' MINIMUM COVER OYERALL WAIF WAN. • \,.�` \\ . - I
COMM LIF I
v� � �� � J l��e ' '' `\1 � ` �t /� � � �r4 4 ) f � <c `�wv�p�UL I ( l s�•
r ' f INY<960.1 .STX
yA I S,MN 'BUNC
O
J1 ( ( RIbK.� INV/ 7W 1 ��
ujl n 1 ( 1( WV.959.64 'k\ �cg67.5 N V i/p
� �, `�•� .mac- �� A I � / vN
jI+N ¢ ;
Y
s J JJJ J I 1 &5ulL 1NG p �y N
r a 2 e 311 Nl' 6 NY l� - OR4/N4gf AND '
UTILITY
EA {�7�_ ---�� � iIl' (/ � c � � 1 •� • i
'� ' ' •.` �s � j v2 ' � 1 ; IN B6 7 SNR O }.00X � R. :A',tr. V / ' •�
' � __ r � {�L• INV=9`A7 �1j ' /
C9'D IWATEHN,IVi 2 ) NI { l I
g l n W1
LC ro I f i -5 Po 9 .3
_ Il' a INV�96i-B5 S I _9 .D7 1`�N-77'
i1�Y
O V=956. E -'l
i 06 .3
J I I rn a
HV837.3 47
1. PVC 'DOA ]I 9S
I Co WA
---�F MAIN
all �� 1g' 1`1 fj 3
PVC AN' y m 'SJYn O �7URE p�� PHASE 1
1 35 SAN
I I f ryZ O 1.�� ylFUTURE PHASE TIDP HAS'Ej N f I JJJ
PHASE 1 65 5yµ O D. T 9
Po4 64.7 N24 tf 75' NmHASE 7 ;m-.3.9 863.9
l ` wl3 174 LF IIr HOPE SIN SYS O ME= 51L <� NV -98418 STM a Q60X SII/
RIH
RIM -983.2 W 9 .72 I f /
r ' NV 95663 WV 95977 P D 7 f
,` 1 IF 4' DP
STA SRR a o.BOX FUTURE PHASE PHA'w.SEi'. 7 )
I—N—I �I--I 8" PVC C900 WATERM/JN N_ l I
I! 8� PVC C90D WATFRAIAIN
1 7 IT TYP. It i I N-1--I—I-1 I 985.0
Sn qq RIM= 77((
6 2 IF B' PVC SDR 35 SIN SWR O 0.40% ( I f 220 LF W pw STIR 35 SAN SWR O 11401( X Wif=9S4.d7(�� /
5 A ITTr
> I 0 /
GATE YALVE
6 I
TrH
IT64. / �E W TEE jl I I
1 1 I L W ` 37 NV- 55. CUR & HYDRANT (I W
)+ - NV. 54. N a N % ( - ff R (TYp.) III /
I 301E 6' PVC B0R 35 SAN SYR O 1.00X Al 55. CBM1 �
1 1p �'=SNE) /
BUILDINGFOURBUILDING F VE ; N�-P t ~Z 11 I I a➢`
- -- — — — — I
J1 ^ DRAINTRE em
1 V 5eg o y PH SE 1 fFE=966.5 3D tF B' Pvr PUMP , - J
1 + FFE-966.0 SDR 35 SAN 't s
I 1 I. 0� r SRR 0I.ODX > I c I
1/ �4 ri•Y Y � �, , / 1 / �i � � � � (
�2Pa 1 RlNagfi3.6 '
E r J t 32 LF 24' HDPE
S1)A SWH O 201E -s I W
{ 1 015' �Ilt00
------ -----------------—--—-- - - - - -- - _ / I
wv9saD 1 b malas --- -- A - - - - - - -------------------—--- - - - - -- - --- �'.as
- q A� - INET-93344:ux} COMNECT TD 7 �� 1 a /
c 1 1 '+;�`ipe YB� CONSTRUCT T9.,a �WATERSET� I SII
(- � T T � � �IT9DEDRDp
10 0
O TOWNHOMES
m
04-11854UTIL
5
9-4-07 CITY APPROVAL RECORD SET/PERMIT SET
➢E9p{ED: 1 HFJrf9Y CFRNNEI' nun THS P.»N, TEO17CAnCN. 111 PoPURT w+s
4
3
8-7-07 OWNER APPRAISAL SEC
7-16-07 RENSEDPIROWNER/ARCHITECT RENEW
MTJ WLY 65F1YaT�n p UNDER � � � Tyr¢ u
mm
An Anderson
QUAD DEVELOPMENT — NEW BUILDINGS
00110. NO. PLCITED,
17654
STATECiNPRR30TA
DRAVM.
CIVIL
2
1
7-2-07 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR CITY SUBM17TAL
6-4-07 PREULIINAITY PLAN FOR CITY SUBM17YAL
PRINT NAME MARK T. JASTER
Pte'
E N G I N E E R I N C AND LAND SURVEYING
MONTICELLO MINNESOTA
1
SITE UTILITY
PLAN DRAWWG "°.
CHECKED B1'; 9GNATURE:
13605 In 4y211Us RmiDt s NTs lDo, pLYyoure_ la 661u
HTG ARCHITECTS, INC.C
NO.
DATE DESCRIPnON OF REVISIONS
DATE JJNE 4. 2007 LICENSE F 40931
TCL. (959) 412-4000 TAY (763) 412-4M0
C4
I""Standi Morl for
- .L, IS, Storm Sewer
the -i City ?Aontll
MM -r___?-- —400-1
Til Guard for
Standard Plate rary for End Section
03-86 4003
1--i -AFER—M-1—
Ux Nal FOR �"Vos
>
L
cowIRAOE
&cree &Gutter
Ell i
E[&ra Catch smnaero Plate Lwory for
the (uy of MO.
Standard Frame
and Cover
1002
Typical Hydrant
St-ve
St -d.6 P'.i. LAry for r"Stallotian
the City W 11.1ii
a3 a9 2Wt
SLondard Plate Ubrgry for
the City of Monticello
_14
IFE
We
Blocking for
*AoStandord i iPor
Wotermain
C
a ky .1 Zkelo
mm
'. I. -
Gw�_ 2002
vs
SLondard Plate Ubrgry for
the City of Monticello
Catch Basin
Monhole
4007
T"loo'Water
Standord Plate M—Y for Service
the '�'l f iii Na
on'
E-
-w
.T
Ramp Pedestrian
.
R
MID .p
@e ply of MantiWbra
w o o
. —3-0
5009A
T
MEMO,
JW
a MIN MI S 2YF AMMO .... . -
maw -
all
Trical Connection
or
num
Vkitennnolinelnsulcitlon Standord Sanitary . PV Unitary Sewer
Standard Pmt¢ L-..ry f., and Lowering e Outside D4o&.S,Sctlon for P.
Monhol W Sal hole st-d.rd let. i I'll far lic"'Jol, .0h desrion
Sionderd Plate o LI, Curb Romp
12--oo 2006 Y kw na Ih4 City of tm.di
Il CR "i le— _U.
-as Mill 31 1. city f 1J 03 -BS Rare o
Di 3006 pill
5 8-4--07 CITY APPROVAL RECORD SET / PERMIT sEr DESIGNED: I KENER, crxnrY TRAT tws Pill SPOOD'i US REPORT WAS
4 11-7-07 Wi APPRAISAL SET MTJ Pi BY K Me VNIDER all �YSKN MD WT I M cmilil. no. PLOTTED:
3 _ A i U PAMESSIal MMEIR UNDER ENE i a IRE Anderson Engineering of LLC
— 7-110-D7 REVISED PER W_ CHIl ill DRAW SIAIEWNIW�T& QUAD DEVELOPMENT — NEW BUILDINGS 11854
2 7-2-07 REVISED PRELI)ANARY PLAN FOR CITY suEWTTAL PSH PRINT NAME- DARK T. JASIER CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SUEVEY.IKG MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA DRAWING NO.
1 15-4-o? PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR CITY SUBMITFAL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
NO. DATECHECKED BY-. StONATURE 18111015 3,1 Anwn woRTH, sum ISS, PLYMem, UK 66441
IDESCRIPnDR OF REVISIGNS DATE --AELI-2-007— i M CM) 41"DDD PAX (1-3) -M�M HTG ARCHITECTS, INC. C5
_14
We
Blocking for
*AoStandord i iPor
Wotermain
C
a ky .1 Zkelo
mm
'. I. -
Gw�_ 2002
Catch Basin
Monhole
4007
T"loo'Water
Standord Plate M—Y for Service
the '�'l f iii Na
on'
E-
-w
.T
Ramp Pedestrian
.
R
MID .p
@e ply of MantiWbra
w o o
. —3-0
5009A
T
MEMO,
JW
a MIN MI S 2YF AMMO .... . -
maw -
all
Trical Connection
or
num
Vkitennnolinelnsulcitlon Standord Sanitary . PV Unitary Sewer
Standard Pmt¢ L-..ry f., and Lowering e Outside D4o&.S,Sctlon for P.
Monhol W Sal hole st-d.rd let. i I'll far lic"'Jol, .0h desrion
Sionderd Plate o LI, Curb Romp
12--oo 2006 Y kw na Ih4 City of tm.di
Il CR "i le— _U.
-as Mill 31 1. city f 1J 03 -BS Rare o
Di 3006 pill
5 8-4--07 CITY APPROVAL RECORD SET / PERMIT sEr DESIGNED: I KENER, crxnrY TRAT tws Pill SPOOD'i US REPORT WAS
4 11-7-07 Wi APPRAISAL SET MTJ Pi BY K Me VNIDER all �YSKN MD WT I M cmilil. no. PLOTTED:
3 _ A i U PAMESSIal MMEIR UNDER ENE i a IRE Anderson Engineering of LLC
— 7-110-D7 REVISED PER W_ CHIl ill DRAW SIAIEWNIW�T& QUAD DEVELOPMENT — NEW BUILDINGS 11854
2 7-2-07 REVISED PRELI)ANARY PLAN FOR CITY suEWTTAL PSH PRINT NAME- DARK T. JASIER CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SUEVEY.IKG MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA DRAWING NO.
1 15-4-o? PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR CITY SUBMITFAL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
NO. DATECHECKED BY-. StONATURE 18111015 3,1 Anwn woRTH, sum ISS, PLYMem, UK 66441
IDESCRIPnDR OF REVISIGNS DATE --AELI-2-007— i M CM) 41"DDD PAX (1-3) -M�M HTG ARCHITECTS, INC. C5
GRAVEL
StnndDrd P101e L,brvry for CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
We Cty Oi LIrnllcello
--5015 03-05 5015
STORM WATER P01111PON PREVEN7.ON Tm NOTES
WQxD mr+aAciDP swL wuFY LDc+m�s Af:D oEYArras a fu
L�PED1nE YDUfv DaVAN6 PWIR TO Co16IIMTnos
Cp.TRQ ,KA9JR6 CNl6 fat at 8:E2 PLNb NID
SPETiICwIMK, wG uAY NEIN %i Edre. EEVDmrtAMf eAi'rs
DR 1WYnARY SIIOGNt M3PS swi ¢misTmRLtm Aw sMs+..r
L4 iNE CDILOMNG MOtle
Saaicnai fJIR✓TI[ES A VNW W R ]0 FEET.
� raASER¢
E srowi vA�g nn rRwx'�'sim°fn1uLA» vr:Euv TAnrtu
r. rAlDrov auvATm Axo E�wwTRr lauwlc )
Ii mom'-Bni. D,r�,mLxs a L°TesQn rxAvrn APPas
L DOEI AKD mn£T Rml6 seffpmT TQ 5[aSI SFYFA NnzA
a o+ADPm axmAcnrn sHAa PwmaE AVD uAIInur Au EN�m ae+ma. ucfs,Nu a AxwD,�
mT � ��tDffi PNASf F rmaArm�c IaanDJeTtTs As wE As wosrAt oafma loAan>a As
•w uuur'i�Ai uAv sE Ru m Yo �va`w9ura.�omA.Rr
N. 4A famat �laa rAalRs you � uwrAT+ID BY T�
WHmA4TM DllesiD ig9tACRtl M.6E NLR iNDY��CATkY15
sPLL � RFvOHa BY INE ED.VNG mvt]ALnai twTl DFfc® of Tti
�M DRID�IID <OttlilFCtCR svJ; Tx[N BStWE THE 4AXgR1rtV
NKA N ACxfmwN¢' IeRI THEY FYN6 Ara SFE�IU.i]NS
S Wn%A PICIX%AP. AEtPT� a415iY�L5 ll�LLTMP£�PoY9®��1K�
de®'D AW UgNED�grgFlpR OF'l� rAO.CCi.
0- PAWL BE PCR+[nm NM A VDb1iN� �TOP� �IDlsTw�emV �uiID Bi r. LA� E
Q YVI<NID AT INE PP66WID euTFS iDMM l3 NaltS CF PLNRt auDwG WAESS OMOYISE NOTEA
rmratme uoA/Aa¢ RAY
AWASVAtt A p�O�Pa�� �� Wvt�>� Oa�Da�a�[' WrW OPV It�K TJ3V5[D
• vE F0.TOYm+O TAg,A69..Oo6 u9 TVE PnfuES
- P✓� pledu0>, flee m am Cm row. qn .M1e. the ovR Y rrot
'MRN HIl IDI WK
], it AlnBe} �mrPLR Alo [anaq neVAttYa 31vw1 al 4H PWI xt> <TA�f {ppI A PINI
DRVttNc AI>o pfpyal CaitRO[. 6FPAlNNS SW1L iNi PIAtE MiHn M CCNEI%UCoat lmfi
'' no Wray sASAai os T'A°rr®nc TA°'inwnnl a mwxuzlw°�`cTawicO� BE acuan w.Er rRcu PAtsn
IB raoSnE fEvnrnRBx sEumATwl.AVls As aaElm m Tu oID,�L
AIL fdT[Rr.TVIXYs 61NE tDCll MAIOb!ID DOTUCf SN41 M SJ.ILSMD PFF TIE N'PRdhn PWS{.
iL ALL Olosal Q r♦I)wDa Datut ro-nwnfs siaRv m TwS PINI AID
'P�AOIECOXG ATFR QI411YBi LC2IN OA1CA4 �IDmv�ivarE�iLIT�ICA�ias�sTn�i wEAmOTY.
Il MOET4R P9L )LL DEOVI:R POOIIS 9 �.6E A�nEOuATd inortCun�rml—¢[ A
Wei u56 MPA615D BTRIY d59PATL1 MSKES
T
l ALL SOLA HASTE/ Ca151RUCtb1 IrBOE SY41 B[ Gsr@'D 6 u ACWR04tfE YETH uiu IRI`Cl� �5H Vuw3 wTSIW,s yBA1A D_ STDaLa/ Dla0A0 ff W Wug1l4CE RtH
oa-MActuT u91f6urrAD'�i WwsADRUAx�aR4Aial uETxms IIe�roT �irum�RE E + wE cars o-
wiwTlws ATCLswY ro RA»DLY sTAsv¢ SyRIL rmncN. Rxrs, m
ixEswlr oT ss snilanf umpx to mvPLV Nml Iwul: REo�Evons Tla Aaec wY sE
mruH:�im ai sfw: uaAs i ui¢iuT�« i xm �'sA>mmu�LL xm�»D=uRf�w.ww�s e�w�rc
w ��PIA>t°iTA n n¢ roliovRanl ,� uYrF+ac woorsTNmum stEcc�..xacTio: La*A:s swAx
TMeam i m �Rppmelvl�suar � N mi�vAAmlmm rm Txrs a•rxAl�ms Tfs� fD.nxns PAr a
uE010�01L ABLY tYPE 1 SNAALG M�'O rr�.ac xM�t'ME Slnauw[ SCC u'IASIIDV
IC'IHW R In'CROSPAb Sf 1FFllRlm[ A`U 6 rfroxNwlG Sit Siratm
m � PACE MIIIIXR�E uqF elm a�iP a�,Le51 N YAIX�i15[B�aT'A�PATYrCWY S
Ivi a D,mavTAt TO A2 uro3a< WMRa ha 1-W.
l6 � �4� fETyN1�aDLfNI Of1fA0ffR ELLS PoRnbL5516 n�4 P?a'[Ntt l0 YAwa5 HrtgA3)
OR <FYRRTtti VL6T SudlDf A 9.IYAfLvai RfaTSTSsixn bOVI T oRYs n-15s�Y6
Aunalµ CMra1 tF T� sIE. CwuEN6Ya 1q� Drl MOR FOTTYYI R' DE 9L . CR a nD: Lf:At
izwsTR Self OR ItOSNO VY llff HIIPotIY.
lT. LRivM1119F &nMHs 814.E DE N®.Y:SCaE EIW EBD49NYD ANT Alto Au NEtLSAD♦ FROSa!
CaR110. fKfS1AVs AS VAT $ I�IRBII li•7PExEp [ot5 suu TAN9Sr GF O3T NOI K ISDIW
6 SfANED II®t {W SAT 6AtA fP AIL LTsd iSfdi AT tlVlSlmX.ilcVlnmt EY uLLutLE
1 d.�N FM 5[L tl'ilidYSE1` �fiW�IXN4vUClg1 AV -A
RCIX CR."1161G110N OnNAV[e flaYufS T` rO Y T,vx BOaC DPm avTcmE TNwc
0. SSER CILfIID.'G AS vAV 8E DFtlATID stRAD vTNaE INAacPN: OCCVi
sl[ eJLLTAS l@ REOEasa TO vAwTA01 I4T5 UNfG SUtN 1rvE AE FiavDUq
Y4:O5/fii£tATNN ASE iSrARUSGD.
16 T�MY DA9�N 5W YDE If5o6URY 3nTmItAGSY aC[f� iat Cm5TMF1KKl ts� �'M U ".
GaICiER IAVOCE A5 N£uS^ VM.
19. Bui ��h}rtAnov anMQ R TD BE PROSILN➢ ro ALL 5]OTY •2YFA CATCH D.l 5 TIxdH.laf
uuc`�':`irvu a rwrs rTu�sE� A'P'Lms w s � I+.&'AzsT Ruacwwr minas tw uw:Lmu AVn
A) InslclaGon
Pon 1� ao�L kO ZnVIr M'e?OF
vVor roar
ttxA rss 7 Trow 4 „amu
� Tm . r.nYAlm soL
�W
I BEFEHY CEROK 1XAT TmS Pu.N, EPEYA1CAnR1, LYt —T -S
AE+�I.A WDpC
PTT o^
Bf N®nlAnonDe
ro]M �� wt aE r ♦ rml r M P+ta.
—� S
TIC
LTEI 17AB.3 H6
Slandord PlDte Lbrvey fcr FlTER FRIC
the City Of MDnNce4'O I�
o3 -w
1004
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PI AN
SCH D 1 OF INSTA ATION &MAIN NAN
aEa �xwrnr'L� SE31GYAl
PIYFEt 6 u1Qrt. Y
Stl fliitE TF CATTC,Vq P AATU6 Eo.�Ltm~si� AffA 6
1S RELtA�A. S
c�rAnsc PNDn�Tornamt� I�Ec�R�ai�x PRaD m vA� c.
w as R
��5YdNOf uTce �FeMC�D �rtG�uRC ®mL PE3V1l.TNi.
uiu"t' Q m ouuW Dale �T Iii:Aiwcuir �.auL.wc
50'NtE EDHST. AND AxD ArT[N NEAW
i DStNLAnaI. fWtY/L.RMii
A vAPnaa
LCTaInm PdD �itax e'�s�' vDn�'� rmrxon.
rNYa AS mIDfD.
4ID Q W l01 Nc QaT w VAaTAa Atl RdM/L
BaERI.MfK mRa RfvIACE WA9c-� ��n�♦.
/ETAS FIUEaAIO.Y.
odE*m02C�pu �nqn wl£T tGUSIx'JLIpV DID IS WAOW � I]HA t1aMRARY AaR4
ME nALY fEnvSo
HDv: my
IafIDPu v6 ui f�arcAsffi`i¢ orosa� a s�oeli mrrwu nws.
CALL 48 H. BEFORE DIGGING:
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
riAN CIN AREA (551)434-o0G2
MINNESOTA TOLL FREE J_ Joe
�KrA.ra I,I
O Batt �BRLE D11GN CxECA rn e
DILE (1(ECN
TG PAOTECi $TDA4 SEYEF 1HLETS
-A9L.
04E OEDI tAvw f
r�
HALE CHECK
Slondord P"" HA -,y far OETYVLS
the City o{ HA -,y
+• Pwu 1005
T
LE.,
A` VNCOT J139 a.A55
S AOCJtEOATi DAY luDt7
APPA0IID S1Bf6A0E
LIGHT DUTY PAVEMENT SEQ-00N
NDr m sunt -- -
W OAATTIDrt YCT CX OEAGN AHD
EAMriRADE R i�ID1T5 %t]N IYO1EtldDf�lL RTPdir
AND >FcvYLaaAnovs PBiaT ro corminfcTbN.
. hash for
StDntla(d Plole LOrory lar End S.U.U. tM
thR C{y of Mmtkdlo
Ram 03-08
4003
LEj:'7
TACH 2W L"
FAIUWRWSlfEN-Y3M (fEL7
eA` {MOOT ]ITO CLASS
S AGREOAY OILS (VDi.7
APPROtID 9D3LAADE
HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT SECTION
xar To scAlE
HOIf vRPT PASEVOR SEDnCN MENTI ANO
AN raDmwoD °1iADi-P�avrs vxl�w�To ranazr
was Po vva.rt,V w. unw•rr"eer_��wm
SlOndare PmtD IIDrOry for � SpHlway Secci�
the Ci{y of Monacello
o3 -os
4009
,R
o-rVR w. r nrrnvY xI / ruCfAl I x
DESIGNED_
I BEFEHY CEROK 1XAT TmS Pu.N, EPEYA1CAnR1, LYt —T -S
4
3
8-7-07 ON47ER APPRAISAL SET
7--16--07 RT15DPEROHNER/ARCHITECT REVIEW
MTJ
MLY�VE011Yf8�fD EDF; DHu IX „lam � E u O*
StAT68F10NHISOTA
Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC
QUAD DEVELOPMENT - NEW BUILDINGS
GWdM. N0. PLOTIm:
2
7-2-07REySED PREUA6NARY PLAN FOR CITY SUBMITTAL
PLAN FOR CRY SUBMITTAL
PSH
PRINT NAMENARK T. JASIER
CIVIL £NGINE£RINO AND LAND SURVEYING
MONTICELLOARY MINNESOTACONSTRUCTION
N0,
DATE
6Y:
URE:
19005 T,E A46NV6 ROItffi, slfRa PLYNDL4 > E6,.1HTG
,
ARCHITECTS, INC.
DETAILSCHECKED
tC
OES(3UPRON OF REMS(ONS
DATE
GATE _SNE 4 20074 2007 LICF1lSE } 40931
111 (489) S12-9008 FAX (483) i12yp90
X (
B
v
Site Plan NORTH
SCALE. 1" - 40'
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
The greater of one tree per 1,000 sq.ft, of gross building
floor area,or one tree per 50 lineal feet of site pedmeter.
SCI FF.
51.100 SCIAL11000=51.1=51 Irees required
LN.Fr.
19441n.ft.i54=38.88=39 trees required
Trees Required per code: 51 trees
Trees Provided perplan: 57 trees
PLANT SCHEDULE
IRI' DN CPVAIOkROTbIiIGpLtWJE eQE 0.00 eDAlrtlf..
ORNAMENTAL TREES
t✓E rMaE
.Iwa.l.„nJi,mr
tlS
eB
EVERGREEN TREES
xr
asN0l.E,l1A.IPlE
j
C
xr
s• ea
SHRUBS A PERENNIALS
gryH MRUBELIE HYOeJ.eGFA
da s<n. •J,wl,eii•
� m',L
27-
�cwoPut�oaGTwwo
.
x
iV
KPYJ TI K0.9LF9ERSTER
rsr -
aWNJPYrtInE O0.K
26"
LYNPw asf
NPs TY Krnwrus
'tkm Fla W
o,wusamer
611E SOB S(Ea.A OOBOpA111LY
ee
ORNAMENTAL TREES
PP:KSPIRESC
Pse s ue:iPaa ror
r ee
EVERGREEN TREES
nu Pi "
s
ISMI 14 Paa ,.ra Ew,we
C
cos B I
s• ea
SHRUBS A PERENNIALS
gryH MRUBELIE HYOeJ.eGFA
da s<n. •J,wl,eii•
� m',L
27-
�cwoPut�oaGTwwo
.
x
iV
KPYJ TI K0.9LF9ERSTER
rsr -
it
xair ler
!Pe OI 1BT1£PRnlre
LYNPw asf
NPs TY Krnwrus
'tkm Fla W
>z
611E SOB S(Ea.A OOBOpA111LY
Si moL
TAY IS TAIIr+IPY tt:IY
t5 mat
LANDSCAPE NOTES;
1. ALL "ONG BEDS 70 BE EDGED TAIN EACH GAifDID CR EWA BLACK fight EDGING AND
MULCHED IRTH I -M,12' RIVER ROCK MULCH It 3' DD'TH 054E A WL POLY NEED BARfAER.
2 IAIOSAaE (A1N1RAC10R SWl BE RFSPOfSBIE FOR CONTACTING RAPHER STATE dIC CRL.
FOR UNltiAOgR0UIL0 UIrK1Y IACADOHS PRIOR TO qC ,rl
3. PUNT TIES ES & MRS AFTER AHA GRADES ARE ESTABLISHED AND PRIOR TO PLAKDNG OF
LAWKS, WUSS OTtERWSE ACCEPTABLE To CENTRAL CO Hbt4JDR OR RVHM IF PLAITING OF
LA AT 80 U TO VOI MENHAU CE TO LA REI G�ERGY�PLLNEHRG OPAND �ERATIGRS REPAIRXY
4. F A�DOESCR�RttR OFAECUYAID�ETTIAIAT& NNOWY GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MU AKNG
5. IF MM IS A DISMCPACY BETKEN THE TAMER U' PLANTS SHORN ON THE PLAN AND THE
NUMBER SHOWN ON THE PLANT UST, BE TIMBER SHORN ON THE PLAN SHALL W011.
& VInHSCAPE CONDUCTOR 9W.L VARBAfFf i(5E5 &SHRUBS FOR A PRIOR OF Oti LEAN
AM DATE OF RNA ACCEPTANCE AC M'SYT D M=" INILUTARG BEATH, POOR CRDXIR, ANO
PWAIS ORIENTATION.
7. PROVIDE SOL AMfNDMFN35 AT ILL TM & SHRUB PLANIRKG ROLES CONSISTING Or EOKUL MLY
OF ORGANIC MATERIAL ELAAK ORT, AND SANG.
8 ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE RATEDTOR LI'MAATE TOIPU" AWRE ZONE AND SNAIL COMPLY
1RTH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AVEflCAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK AUERfCAT
A5SOCLATtON OF NHRSRD PX
9. AIL URN AAFAS TO RAPE IRRIGATION AOI 500 TO PROPERTY LINES At41/Ok TO RACK OF
CIMIff ALONG ROTI DF 1lfAY5.
IO SOO SAL BE CULTURED KENTUCKY H.ULQtASS, FREE OF NEEDS & CAULS. LANDSCAPE
CONTRACTOR `RLL WATER AT TWE OF l4STALATICIR ALAI ROLL ALL SOD AS HEM To ASZgE
SODSHALL111 TLIFF BEE RETI' A(f.D�BY THE LfNOS AIL S"ES CAPE � g�ORR.E SIAL BE SIAI(FD. AHr 5tIDIRG OF
11. ALL SOD IS TO BE IRRIGATED.
12 AL THOSPLANTED SHALL RECEIVE SUBJECTED WOOD MIAAI SAUCERS WIN A MDDUIM
DEPTH OF 4' AS SHOWN IN BETAS.i
td AL TREES SHALL BE STAKED IF OEE30 HECFSSARY AND MAPPED AT THE ENO OF THE
GROWNG SEASON.
14. LANDSCAPE OD TO WOLLIDE A CUIM£aE IAM IRItlGAROR 51SUR AS REO RED.
�Oe agIl�POrcmvmW iCanS
,m,emm.cy:l mmm,mm ms
,Darrwe mLKa nyl:t
mikd4rm"ms4.
•core me m ee w �a a e•ym myna a1 o aemee wa.
SNede Truele pleDtil Oq elaU
.eve
a .n,�ama�m, ertBrs-
�� ' • Yama ¢1t W DlMrgmSed
aON.E, loo:arcp;ei Mgapa m a �
5t -b Plan' Delal
Oomt al:w Eah/ armulf, mitamlm m,w iW cw,l�Wli
lttod meM daBia,apecMin,apiUL
'ROTE: T,aeb W adFen 69�OenaJJmis iSaotlNEuk.
SNede Tree Pfanlieg De�iH
SIOpeAladtlan •,.m
MARKELL — LABEREE
DESIGN GROUP
15 8RENTYHDO0 AVE.
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
PH; 651.222-9250
FAX; 852474.0155
I hereby certify that thus plan was prepare)
by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly rcgistercd LANDSCAPE
ARCWTECT under the laws of the State
`//y�`yy-!/f' ofMiunesota.
!_EE MARKELL
Date: 6131104
License No. 14313
L930
TG ARCHITECTS
4 Hennepin Town Rd.
n Prairie, MN 55344
REVISIONIISSUE DATE
RBwftd PAbaeig i 711ZO
Permit selJete'ser aSITN7
fwamiftw Pul grpQ p7
OFSISNED. SKM I SHEET,:
ORAWM aKr•, L I
CHECKED. LM
DATE; 5.04.2W7
Typical Z -story Office Landscape NORTx
SCALE: 1' = ID'
2 -STORY PLANT SCHEDULE
NEY OTY Q01/.MONlsOTAN1EK NAME GTE ROOT REMARKG
SHRUBS 8 PERENNIALS
.R 9
yyp roalari,PafUn„
95
maL
DWE 4
E yamsaAM'Comp �s
910
—L
IPS 6
SAa'Aaata= 1=
Primase
C2
rnAL
LW 18
JaniaeM rliloe�uk'Nonkp•
f,5
mnL
5TH is
L AYl1LY
rkvaem &—Skazdov
41
mnL
TAY 28
TAUNTON YEW
k5
TEA 2
TE EHNYUPAIGHTARnORNTAE
q
BB
TOG ' acfide4.
Ti
MULTI -TENANT PLANT SCHEDULE
10=Y QTV EOAWONMOTM4CAL RAue SuE ft REMN.s
SHRUBS & PERENNIALS
ANN 4
MH-EHYDRMN
93 mK
e erboresaw'Mnafxae•
DIQ 7
Sy�Gga maavN-NEN '
95 mnL
ME 2
E�mrparprs ahau'EipxM'
910 mnl
GALS 74
SpA�oai'GolOmmmtl'
m^L
Gl:t 18
LY
ilomomaar'Sle@addo'
�
TAY 7
TAUMDNYEW
95
MARKELL — LABEREE
DESIGN GROUP
15 BRENTWooD AVE
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
PH:952-07x2260
FAX: 952J74-0155
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared
by me or undermy direct supervision and
that I am a duly registered LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT under the laws of the State
ofMinnesoM
LEE 1AARl�
Date: 8/31M
License No. 19313
Lu CL
a
� O
U
O
Q -0 M
coz
O
g0
K
u
y
4
PREPARED FOR.
HTG ARCHITECTS
9300 Hennepin Town Rd,
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
ND. REWSIDNIISSUE DATE
1 Revrsed POasing 771ZD7
2 I-.-Itsevuidso aWiro7
3 l PmUmmary Plot 9/pgAyl
DESIGNED; SHA{ SHEET:
DRRSYN: SiUd
L2
CHECKED; UA
OA7E: 9,04.2007
Is-
5AW SRKGO RA OPAWL
EQLiaaJ -
P05T-ttP. i M:nT 51HL $ALL 18'GANE BOLT, G4S i
6X6 MAIM YLYD
5V RT OM
< PART
TD. FTG. I TEACH &ATE
P05T T IMAL
IV ammr, PAM
CCW.
�'J I/4'=4' -O'
IFTE.•5EE
5774 G1,
2x4 /4700 STW w
4'6 STL PIPE BCllARD -
3N'TRCATEDRr-------------
FELL _C.iklG.I PAJN7
VLWYER
Of OWER
i
7EiO JG. 1'TE5
b'R '
GATES
--- — ----
pE (WE B0.15
4
agyI%4
u
V FR F7. Q
m �
WOOD SLAT
3
— _____
• • l
,
�' �P.
ice
SRAVVEL
. B :
i �r amm
51. AS RFD%)
II
i
—WLEU RAEEVE5
II
FOR GAHE saT5
TYR
TRA5H PLAN
51TE PLAN
2x4 WE FRAIL
(PaIVJ km 1117O0
SLA75
TD. fRNa15
y' E1... b8'Q•
KYY ARpOTeG All T'
BARREL HRGE - 3 P£R—
SATE, Eal "= FRaE
TD RTEE RATE
4'0 5TL PIPE
EMLIJV
i FILL
FAW
6Y6 TREATED MIX
F05T IYPK.AL STD. FRAMING
'51B' BREADED RM
NEEDED TO STEEL EIY}•ET
RATES - SCR54 PLATES 70
14700 KRAIT:
TREATED P=
r -Typ.
bx6 TREATED WX P •--•---'J'=Vr r 14Eg,J LS7AT&EY i10f05TEEL R J
EQLiaaJ -
P05T-ttP. i M:nT 51HL $ALL 18'GANE BOLT, G4S i
FILL R/GGw'.
i iBEARDIS' SY,7VF1. A YcR BATE
< PART
TD. FTG. I TEACH &ATE
196,957 S.F. (4,52 ACRES)
'� `�F 5fldG7. J-`ti�RE7+F.
CCW.
�'J I/4'=4' -O'
IFTE.•5EE
5774 G1,
TRA5H ENC L05URE ELEVATION
1/4'4-0'
AUTUMN
wj
MOGE 2ND
AUUN
6x5 TREATED HL70D
POST TYPZAL
xE wva i
i'
32,000 S.F. (16%)
PAVED AREA
96,177S.F. (49%)
GREEN AREA
4 FT6.•SEE
ST"T,
ENOLOSURE ELEVATION
196,957 S.F. (4,52 ACRES)
_TRASH
�'J I/4'=4' -O'
T
AUTUMN
ZONED B4 REGIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING AREA 51,100 S.F.
OFFICE PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
3 SPACES PLUS 1 PER 200 S.F.
AREA USED FOR CALCULATIONS 90% OF ACTUAL AREA
51,100 x 90% = 46,990 S.F.
45,9901200 = 230 PARKING SPACES
230 + 3 = 233 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED
243 TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED
BUILDING AREA
FOOTPRINT
32,000 S.F. (16%)
PAVED AREA
96,177S.F. (49%)
GREEN AREA
68,780 S.F. (35%)
SITE AREA
196,957 S.F. (4,52 ACRES)
~1
TN .htg-architects,com
9300 Hennepin Town Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Tel; 952.278,88B0 Fax: 952.278,8822
WP-J61tf ®2OOf tai RFC, ArchEects
PROJECT
QUAD
DEVELOPMENT
NEW BUILDINGS
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
ISSUED SET 09-0447 PREUMINARYPLAT
REVISIONS
DATE NO,
Nq
BUiIDM fc
U MOM SIREBT
DUFFAIA, MN sm
J HEREBY LfR7JfY Ila? EMS PIA&
SPfCx7UnDN OR REPORT WA$ PRCPAREO DY
MC OR VRDFR ur DJRfCl A
SI/PFA',t.SKY;AO11Gl J ZPAER. LY U6CRSFD .fR,71tTfG1
UA9CR THE
LAYS
of
IN£ 3Td/F DF
.JNNESDTA
,.IAME�(, ERtJVER
4e9as 0410415]
REG AD. DATE
SITE PLAN
N
fRp'MBk AAT C7f{7QD8y. TRM
s
Al J
v w�
Quad Development
Monticello, MN
r! xreaur
DIAM er: AAT MED® R. TFN
,afL 0,, LeDN
L.rrop.rr.t
Lww�v Lv lffcHp+cn
s m�
] Y
31yRL
]t000 a]pp yryse CCcw C...cow III [N--Irr`wl-ai fWV Im rysr
SV eep.ented rsye fell •w•+t !i
J G]
2 ! 90 DL -H
]2[00 an Nc-1 Cd..n Gmcwsar 111 {q.Jpp-SW-33 1%. 1011>pr
V srpxnira El90 2x] Dde ]rt esv
E t!
]8Gr-84k
3p00p 0.>Or xcfsof Crrem cenrewf. llr Gx•lOs-lu•ss +wx w SYDr
V :fp.�.,.tro epu0 esrt Dale vt m,.
2 !]
]yIN
]200L DTpO Nev.h Cdfrn [oxpnif ]il CfL-JM i01•+S JDpy 101 IYp!
IV elD.mtea L —uA mrt ptl! art boc
]A
31E4L
]2tOL 0.500 )kb.i Ctlam Ca.cewar ]]I CQ-J00•IG-3S 4.. M SM
III fe4ntnlea frph p3ft pole Sri ]air
3tolhfk.t nrrp Swwry
LOMI ],q w. xn r..pnsn Ie,rxe, mfrrotpw
Adp ] O.rxfp pal 62 a! SD] 1e30 Norh re ee yfa. f. map 3 wxtp ..eo
%ag i]2 Poe4p 143 7A Ob ]23 12J3 IUrlx r{ .t yfrr ti map 1 prtl 2 parLiy .rrsf
qap +t3 DorL:p 393 8i 05 Se6 lj680 — r[ of year w IDap J .�d 5 rroesp sear
m
/
C
51TE PLAN
Note!
Wali mounted fixtures are
cut-off fixtures.
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
wYvty. htg-arc}l iLacts.com
9300 Hennepin Town Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Tel: 952.276.888D Fax: 952.278.8822
COAYi OM 0.2001 N HT5 Archttecis
PROJECT
QUAD
DEVELOPMENT
NEW BUILDINGS
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
ISSUED SET NOW PRELIMMARYPLAT
REVISIONS
DATE N0.
Buru�s.rvc.
12 Mum SmN
MAEq 547 So
fflcte
�o
LPULSE
nevor mflftay
61J0 PN Gtlr 4. kmNnrt.. a] 3#U
!n 9X21> -WD] r.c 95l•93Y164
trt 1.'.
Contort r..a. Rezf r.arnOxp
Dftr- J.Vp s 34 EO03
PHOTOMETRIC LIGHTING PLAN
DIAM er: AAT MED® R. TFN
Al
m2
s m�
t r2 \ I
a
I 1
MEZZANINE PLAN
nz.i iia•=r-o•
4 4
o ----
Q O_n n n n
www.htg-architectm- m
Itim
9300 Hennepin Town Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Tok 852,278.8880 Fax: 952.278,8622
C01" MGM 0 X0 by HT6 ktha cis
PROJECT
QUAD
-
DEVELOPMENT
NEW BUILDINGS
-
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
ISSUED SET DMi-07 PEL!!AWYPIAT
REYMONS
—
DATE N0,
BLJlLDMWC
-
22
SUFT'W. API =
MOND 7S-WM
r N£ROr cfentr Tzar ma Rwt
SP alxdO N OR REPORT ryes H pmo 8r
ME OR tMD£R MT OWa 5111fftld , AO
THAT I Abi d O'4, Lr£HSfD mcmr£b7
VNKR TN£ TAS/$ Of rNE STAT£ OF
MINN�SjOT.A'
.IAHL^5:�.-ORpyCR
(2999 ODIUM
PEb. 9O.OATE
l
FLOOR PLANS -
1 STORY+MEZZANINE
fI
f oAaslaisr AAT ae=n RM
s
All
Itim
H
am
F1
UPPER LEVEL - OFFICE DUIL®INO - TNO 5TORY
H
rd1
u
m
MAIN LEVEL - OFFICE BUILUINC - TWO STORY
A�22 I/ I-0
ww�,v. htg-arohltecfs,cprn
9300 Hennepin Town Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Tel; 952.278.8880 Fax: 952.278.0822
COM16HT ® 2007 Ij WC, Aralacls
PROJECT
QUAD
DEVELOPMENT
NEIN BUILDINGS
MiONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
ISSUED SET 00-04-07 PREUMNAAY PIAT
REY6SIONS
DATE N0.
S94f
BURDQtS W-
12 7XVEON ==
RUFFAM MN su
P730NET
T HERERr dfillY THAT 1l Pl1fZ
SPWfrA'.. R".';'AS PRCPAREO 8'
MOR !ND[R A+r DiffCT SWYRIK/Ai( ALT/
v7H471 ASS A IX2r LCfMSCP ANLM'TECT
HIDER 7lfi L1,y5OF TRE STAT£ OP
uuo+cmrn
w
-If+MfE�� .6ROVE12
1r1989 Dglp,,�
AEG Ip, DAJC
FLOOR PLANS -
I WO STORY
M" W. AT aeo�sr TI9A
A2v2
(Z) ELEVATION5 - 15TORY + MEZZANINE
A.I os IO
T Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
ELEVATION5 - ONE STORY + MEZZANINE
n ELEVATION5 - ONE 5TORY + MEZZANINE ELEVATIONS - ONE 5TORY + MEZZANINE
S'tY
SIGNAGE
SIGNAGE
SIGNAGE
SIGNAGE
SIGNAGE
SIGNAGE
MEIME
Y
m
11 . Fi1T
I4 Uq 1
TD, MIF"! -9 $
1 MONUMENT 516N ELEVATION
www. htg-aneh i facto. eom
9300 Hennepin Town Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Tel: 952278.8880 Fax: 952.278.8822
GOPMeM 6 2= tg Rr6 A.ra letis
PROJECT
QUAD
DEVELOPMENT
1'11
VONTLELLO, MINNESOTA
ISSUED SET 0990407 MELIKINARY PLAT
REVISIONS
DATE N0,
sq4u
BUI1DFR WC.
u MEW shut'
BU AUX Mh X93
FIKM 70 -0 -MM
1 N£R£8raR;GFY rRAr IHS ku..
SF£LPXOM OR RLFA47 Ou CR pmo Rr
N£ OR UAOFR tJY D!R£Lr lt AW
rWriRpp D/p.Y12£RS£D ARCR,7FLr
UNDER WMosOr DQ STAT£ Or
a.wxesorw
JAMP.f�,{',TS BRAVER
�R989
WNW
A G. Np GATE
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
Z MAHMGe AAT Ofmut.. Tai
All
07,
I I I I I I I I
ELEVATIONS - TWO STORY
I I I I I I I I
ELEVATIONS - TWO STORY
a3� pB _I o
0f, -__-_BD_ 50FFli
l
�t�`�t�rF
4y iA.!M}N LE L
C1 ELEVATIONS - TWO STORY
rt �4kt ^S
0
a'.S! 'kY �t � _t �`"„ i [$�J3 .t- 3a.Y7•i �if:'%¢`IUFFfv.
I
I I 1
I i
1:6i �Afi&'N
fit lF. .�.4 �....��'bl t..
$Ki"U'
g
NINE
0 1 ilml
s
ENORMOUS
I
I I 1
I i
1:6i �Afi&'N
fit lF. .�.4 �....��'bl t..
$Ki"U'
60 �FFI7
EE'121-0' `r
'I'M Lt�fl. Gg
TD�. WJIi LEVLi
EL:I:p-0' Y
ELEVATIONS - TWO STORY
�J va•=r-o�
ao. s�Frc
TD. H�AR71.{VLL s
Li. �1LV-0' `F
www. nta-arch Iteetes,corn
9300 Hennepin Town Road
Eden Pralde, MN 55347
Tel: 952.278,8880 Fax: 952.278.8822
00MIS4T 0.20n N Nre Arthrtects
PROJECT
QUAD
DEVELOPMENT
NEW BUILDINGS
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
ISSUED SET 090407 PR:UMI AYPtAT
REVISIONS
DATE ND.
Sa
BUILDMW—
t2 WARM FIRM
mom
/ HfAFBt 6fR ttms j��aM
SPEC117GTAN IN AfPpR11111 PAfpdRLD 11
784rME IAIYIfR NY IXAfCI SUPfRY15h17/, iVA
k{fAOLCYLKrNSCD ARCwI£Ct
uxLix iNE LAAS G" 78E SIFJF lU
MINNESOTA
_IAMESj 6ROVER
IRA. stir• oeir
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
a[LL1NMer. AAT OEmay. TEM
g
A3m2_
s
ENORMOUS
60 �FFI7
EE'121-0' `r
'I'M Lt�fl. Gg
TD�. WJIi LEVLi
EL:I:p-0' Y
ELEVATIONS - TWO STORY
�J va•=r-o�
ao. s�Frc
TD. H�AR71.{VLL s
Li. �1LV-0' `F
www. nta-arch Iteetes,corn
9300 Hennepin Town Road
Eden Pralde, MN 55347
Tel: 952.278,8880 Fax: 952.278.8822
00MIS4T 0.20n N Nre Arthrtects
PROJECT
QUAD
DEVELOPMENT
NEW BUILDINGS
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
ISSUED SET 090407 PR:UMI AYPtAT
REVISIONS
DATE ND.
Sa
BUILDMW—
t2 WARM FIRM
mom
/ HfAFBt 6fR ttms j��aM
SPEC117GTAN IN AfPpR11111 PAfpdRLD 11
784rME IAIYIfR NY IXAfCI SUPfRY15h17/, iVA
k{fAOLCYLKrNSCD ARCwI£Ct
uxLix iNE LAAS G" 78E SIFJF lU
MINNESOTA
_IAMESj 6ROVER
IRA. stir• oeir
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
a[LL1NMer. AAT OEmay. TEM
g
A3m2_
s
Q ELEVATIONS - ONE STORY 4 MEZZANINE
O
n ELEVATIONS - TWO 5TORY
A4J VS i-0
SIGNAGE
SIGNAGE
SIGNAGE
SIGNAGE
SIGNAGE
SIGNAGE
M
a1 MONUMENT 510N ELEVATION
A4J 1l4'=1'-0'
516N QATA
OW 5TORT I MEZZARRE W11.01%
181 5F. TOTAL
ALLOWABLE 516N AREA = 1151 5F
511.14DUETTE AREA 3,620 5F X 5% = 1815F
1815F t i TEMAWS = 258 5F
Al - Al - WALL 516H
7 -.25.b 5F
TM 5TORT BUILDIN5
217 5F. TOTAL
ALLOWABLE -96H AREA = 211 5F
4,36b 5F X 5% = 216 5F
218 5F / 7 TENANTS = 31.14 5F
Of - 6T - WALL 516N
7 - 31 5F
M ORNEHT 516H
9b SF, TOTAL
61 - 6ROfil ✓D 5151
96 5.1.
www. M1ig-arat9Kects_oom
9300 Hennepin Town Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Tel: 9$2,278.8880 Fax. 952.278.8822
GOPYRf6 02001 N HT6 Archllecis
PROJECT
QUAD gp p�
DEVELOPMENT
NEW BUILDINGS
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
ISSUED SET 048407 PRELNINARY PLAT
REVISIONS
DATE NO.
9Riff
BL41DMW-
12D
BUFFAIANNJW
I R£R£RY rZRIFr Tim ARS pug
SPZW'r170H OR REAWf S R%RARZO Rr
NZ OR 7dYOZR MY DMZS7 SWDOIM,, PID
TRAT I AR A Mr O!C£RSEO A9707£Or
WD£R W{AIk�!.S Or THE STAT£ Of
MINNESOTA r
--�6ROVE:R
— 09/69/07
SIGN PLAN
� 777
0 ONAIYae6 AT mu Br. TRM
51TE PLAN A4.1
A4.1 I -100 0 5
�; 0rca K+Ot�
MONTICELLO
Mr. Troy Gamble
Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC
13805 1St Avenue North, Suite 100
Plymouth, MN 55441
Re: Quad Development Plan Review Comments
Planning Project No. 2011-010
Dear Mr. Gamble:
April 26, 2011
The City of Monticello's Engineering and Public Works Department's reviewed your site
development plan for the above referenced project last revised on October 26, 2007, as well as
the proposed revisions for the development of "Building One", and respectfully offer the
following comments:
1. Construct the entire run of 8" PVC sanitary sewer between SMH-6 and SMH-7 to allow
for proper maintenance of the sewer line, and connect the sanitary sewer service for
Building One to the 8" PVC using an 8" x 6" wye as shown in the plans.
2. Construct 8" DIP watermain and the hydrant lead to the south side of Building Two as
shown in the plans to allow for flushing of the watermain.
3. Run vehicle turning templates around north entrance feature to ensure delivery and
emergency vehicles can safely navigate the site based on proposed parking lot revisions.
4. Delete proposed parallel parking stalls and replace with a minimum of six head -in stalls
on south end of row of parking stalls. Ensure drainage design still functions properly.
5. Animal droppings from pet exercise areas must be fully contained on site.
Please call me at 763-271-3236 with any questions on the comments above. When submitting
the revised plans, please provide a written response to each of the comments.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Bruce Westby, P.E.
City Engineer
cc: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
Bob Paschke, Public Works Director
Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 - 763-295-2711 • Fax 763-295-4404
Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Road, Monticello, MN 55362 - 763-295-3170 - Fax 763-271-3272
Department of Motor Vehicles, 119 3rd Street East, Monticello, MN 55362 • 763-295-2712 • Fax 763-271-3239
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2011 –36
Date: May 3rd, 2011 Resolution No. 2011-36
Motion By __________________ Seconded By _______________________
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER 5TH ADDITION
AND A REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR VETERINARY
FACILITIES (NEIGHBORHOOD).
WHEREAS, Quad Development, LLC has requested an Amendment to Planned Unit
Development for Monticello Business Center 5th Addition and a request for Conditional Use
Permit for Veterinary Facilities (neighborhood); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with this application, the Planning Commission has found it
appropriate to review the City’s previous approval of the Conditional Use Permit for Planned
Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for Conditional Use Permit
for Veterinary Facilities pursuant to the regulations of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 3rd, 2011 on the application
and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present
information to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report,
which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings
of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval:
1. The applications are consistent with the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan for Places
to Shop.
2. The applications are consistent with the Monticello Zoning Ordinances regulating
Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions as outlined.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota:
1. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.357, the application for Amendment to Conditional Use
Permit for Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit for Veterinary Facility
(Neighborhood) are hereby recommended to the City Council for approval.
2. The recommendation for approval is subject to those Conditions as follows:
ADOPTED this 3rd day of May 2011, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
By: _______________________________
Rod Dragsten, Chair
ATTEST:
______________________________
Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator
Planning Commission Agenda: 05/03/11
1
6. Public Hearing – Consideration of a request for Rezoning from B-3(Highway Business)
to B-4 (Regional Business) and a request for Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for
Planned Unit Development for the Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition.
Applicant: IRET Properties (AS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The applicant has withdrawn their application at this time.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
No further action is required at this time.
Planning Commission Agenda: 05/03/11
1
7. Public Hearing - Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance,
Chapter 2, Section 4, Chapter 5, Section 3(D) and Chapter 5, Section 4. (AS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The amended Monticello Zoning Code is in its 6-month code tracking period, which is
intended to identify minor code language adjustments. With adoption of the new code, it
was noted that such amendments may arise as a result of the new code’s daily use and
application.
Staff is requesting that Planning Commission consider amendments to various
components of the code as described below. The amendments presented by staff below
clarify existing components of the code, or are components of the previous code that need
to be incorporated into the new code. These amendments are:
1. Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section 4(B)(2) for
the initiation of Zoning Ordinance Text and Map Amendments
Amendment allows the Community Development Department to initiate Zoning
Ordinance Text and Map Amendments. A 2005 ordinance amendment had allowed
this; it was not transferred to new code. Staff needs the flexibility (especially given
the recently adopted comprehensive zoning ordinance amendment) to call for
hearings for expediency.
Text of amendment:
2.4(B)(2): (c) Recommendation of the Community Development Department; or
Then re-letter (d) Action of the City Council.
2. Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5, Section 3(D) as
related to the standards for Accessory Structures in the M-H District.
Amendment replaces references to former R-4 district with “M-H” in all locations.
Text of amendment:
5.3(D)(2)(b): In the R-4 M-H district, one minor accessory building for storage
of equipment and refuse is permitted for each manufactured home provided the
accessory building can meet all required setbacks, and is designed of weather
resistancet material that will enhance the general appearance of the lot.
5.3(D)(3)(a): In all residential districts except R-4 M-H, the following shall
apply:
Planning Commission Agenda: 05/03/11
2
5.3(D)(3)(b): In the R-4 M-H district, the following shall apply:
3. Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5, Section 4 as related
to the General and Specific Standards for Temporary Uses.
The new code does not have a specific provision allowing for the outdoor sales and
display of goods not related to the principal use (outside of agricultural/horticultural
sales). The need for this seasonal permit relates to those businesses seeking to sell
fireworks, etc. It was initially thought that the City’s Transient Merchant code could
cover these uses, but the Transient Merchant provision covers only the licensing and
not land use impacts related to these types of uses.
The proposed amendment allows for such seasonal uses and also changes provisions
for “Tents, Canopies, Tarp Garages and Hoop Buildings” for these uses.
There is also a need for an amendment to accommodate construction dumpsters
outside of a building permit. This is intended for those property owners making
interior renovations which do not require building permits.
Listed below are the suggested amendments:
Table 5-8: Temporary Structure
Amend text for Construction Dumpster (on private property).
o Allowable Duration: 30 days without building permit.
o Permit Required: No
o Additional Requirements: 5.4(E)(1)(b).
Table 5-8: Temporary Sale
Amend to add additional line item for Seasonal Sales.
o Allowable Duration: 60 days per permit/120 days per calendar year
maximum term
o Permit Required: Yes
o Additional Requirements: 5.4(E)(7)
Section 5.4(E)(1)(b: Construction Dumpster
Additional text:
(vi) Be secured with a cover to prevent litter and debris from escaping the
dumpster.
Section 5.4(E)(7)(d): Tents, Canopies, Tarp Garages and Hoop Buildings
Amended text:
Planning Commission Agenda: 05/03/11
3
o Not be erected for more than a total of 30 days in any calendar year; with
the exception of those uses with valid permits issued under 5.4(E)(12).
Section 5.4(E)(12) Seasonal Sales
Add a new subsection after “Special Events’. Text of amendment:
o Seasonal sales shall:
o Be authorized in writing by the property owner if conducted on
property not owned by the seasonal sale operator;.
o Not be located within any right-of-way;
o Not reduce available parking areas below that which is required
by code;
o Provide adequate ingress, egress and off-street parking areas; and
o Be subject to the sign standards in Sections 4.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to recommend approval of Ordinance #529, amendments to Monticello
Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section 4, Chapter 5, Section 3 and Chapter 5, Section
4, based on a finding that the proposed amendments are consistent with the intent of
the Purpose Statements of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 2 and Chapter
5ection 3 and 4.
2. Motion of other as directed by the Planning Commission.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative 1 above. Staff has found that the proposed amendments
are consistent with the intent of the Purpose Statements of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
Chapter 2 and Sections 5.3 and 5.4.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Excerpt, Chapter 2, Section 4 (B)
B. Excerpt, Chapter 5, Section 3(D)
C. Excerpt, Chapter 5, Section 4(D) & (E)
D. Ordinance #529
CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES
Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements
Subsection (B) Zoning Ordinance Text and Zoning Map Amendments
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 21
(b) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the guiding principles of
the Comprehensive Plan;
(c) The extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated
community need;
(d) Whether the proposed amendment will protect the health, safety, morals, and
general welfare of the public;
(e) The impacts on the natural and built environments, including air, water, noise,
stormwater management, wildlife habitat, water quality, vegetation, drainage,
streets, and other engineering design or environmental factors;
(f) Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed
uses surrounding the subject property; whether the proposed design and land
uses are appropriate for the land; and whether the proposed amendment will
maintain or improve compatibility among uses and ensure efficient
development within the City;
(g) Whether the proposed amendment will result in a logical, orderly and
predictable development pattern; and
(h) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the purpose of this
ordinance.
(B) Zoning Ordinance Text and Zoning Map Amendments
(1) Purpose and Scope
This section sets out the procedures to be followed in reviewing and
considering a text change to this ordinance or an amendment to the zoning map
with the exception of a map amendment to a planned unit development, which
shall be subject to the procedures in Section 2.4(P), Planned Unit
Development.
(2) Initiation of Proceedings
Proceedings for the amendment of the text of this ordinance or the zoning map
shall be initiated by one of the following:
(a) An owner of property or an authorized representative of an owner pursuant to
Section 2.3(B), Authority to File Applications;
(b) Recommendation of the Planning Commission; or
CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES
Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements
Subsection (B) Zoning Ordinance Text and Zoning Map Amendments
Page 22 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(c) Action of the City Council.
(3) Application
(a) All applications to amend the text of this ordinance or the zoning map shall be
in accordance with Section 2.3, Common Review Procedures &
Requirements.
(b) In addition to the common review requirements, applications for changes to
the text of this ordinance or the Zoning Map shall also include the following:
(i) The name of the applicant;
(ii) A narrative explaining the requested modification and the reasons why the
changes are supported by the Comprehensive Plan;
(iii) The legal description of all real property proposed for change, if
applicable;
(iv) The existing and proposed land use and zoning designations for all
properties proposed for change, if applicable;
(v) A map of the properties to be modified to a different zoning designation,
showing the addresses and zoning designations for the subject properties
and the adjacent properties, if applicable;
(vi) The location of the proposed text to be added, amended, or deleted in this
ordinance, if applicable.
(4) Review
(a) Planning Commission
Before any amendment is adopted, the Planning Commission shall hold at
least one public hearing after proper notice has been issued in accordance
with Section 2.3(I). Following the hearing, the Planning Commission shall
adopt findings and recommendations on the proposed amendment as soon as
practical. The Community Development Department may forward an
application to the City Council without a recommendation from the Planning
Commission only if it is deemed necessary to ensure compliance with state
mandated deadlines for application review.
Section 2.3:
Common Review
Requirements
Section 2.3(I):
Public Notification
CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES
Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements
Subsection (C) Variances
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 23
(b) City Council
The City Council may hold a public hearing on the amendment if deemed
necessary by the Community Development Department. After consideration
of the Planning Commission recommendation and/or hearing, if applicable,
the City Council may adopt the amendment or any part thereof in such form
as it deems advisable. The amendment requires the approval of four-fifths of
all the members of the City Council.
(5) Approval Criteria
Recommendations and decisions on zoning amendments shall be based on
consideration of the following criteria:
(a) Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error in the original text or
map; or
(b) Whether the proposed amendment addresses needs arising from a changing
condition, trend, or fact affecting the subject property and surrounding area.
(c) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with achieving the goals and
objectives outlined in the comprehensive plan.
(C) Variances
(1) Purpose and Scope
The Variance process is intended to provide limited relief from the strict
requirements of this ordinance in those cases where strict application of a
particular requirement will create an unnecessary hardship due to
circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. It is not
intended that Variances be granted to allow a use not permitted by the
underlying zoning district, nor to merely remove inconveniences or financial
burdens that the requirements of this ordinance may impose on property
owners in general. Variances are intended to address extraordinary,
exceptional, or unique situations that were not caused by the applicant’s act or
omission.
(2) Initiation of Proceedings
Variances shall be initiated by an owner of property or an authorized
representative of an owner pursuant to Section 2.3(B), Authority to File
Applications.
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards
Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses
Page 306 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(e) Accessory dwelling units shall be positioned in one of the following locations:
(i) Within the principal structure (e.g. a lower level apartment);
(ii) Attached to the principal building;
(iii) Detached and behind the principal structure as a freestanding building or
above a detached outbuilding.
(f) Attached accessory dwelling units shall adhere to the following:
(i) The accessory dwelling unit must be attached to the principal structure
and have an operative interconnecting door with the principal structure.
(ii) Access to the unit shall only be from the side or rear yard of the principal
structure.
(g) Detached accessory dwelling units shall adhere to the following:
(i) The detached accessory dwelling unit shall be a minimum of six (6) feet
from the principal structure.
(ii) The accessory dwelling unit must be located in the same base zoning
district as the principal structure.
(h) The use of manufactured homes, travel trailers, campers, tractor trailers, or
similar vehicles as an accessory dwelling unit shall be prohibited.
(i) An accessory dwelling unit shall have a floor area of at least 300 square feet
and shall not exceed 25 percent of the floor area in the principal structure.
(j) At least one, but no more than two, off-street parking spaces shall be provided
for an accessory dwelling unit (in addition to the required off-street parking
serving the principal use).
(k) Accessory dwelling units shall not be sold apart from the principal structure.
(l) Accessory dwelling units shall not include home occupations.
(2) Accessory Building – Minor
(a) Minor accessory buildings do not require a building permit, but shall comply
with all applicable zoning regulations.
(b) In the R-4 district, one minor accessory building for storage of equipment and
refuse is permitted for each manufactured home provided the accessory
building can meet all required setbacks, and is designed of weather resistance
material that will enhance the general appearance of the lot.
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards
Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 307
(3) Accessory Building – Major
(a) In all residential districts except R-4, the following shall apply:
(i) Size
1. Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section
5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed
ten percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located,
nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory
building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less:
a. 1,200 square feet; or
b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint.
2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section
5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a maximum square
footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use
permit when the following conditions are found to exist:
a. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of
residential personal property of the occupant of the principal
dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for
commercial purposes.
b. The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of
sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open
space on the lot.
c. The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse
effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use
of the surrounding property.
d. The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the
principal building in architectural style and building materials.
(ii) Private Garages
1. Private garages shall be used by the family or families residing upon
the premises, except as follows:
a. One-half of the private garage spaces on the premises can be
rented to non-residents of the property for private passenger
vehicles and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if
sufficient off-street parking in full compliance with this ordinance
is provided elsewhere on the property.
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards
Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses
Page 308 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
b. All of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to
non-residents of the property for private passenger vehicles
and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if the
available garage space does not exceed two spaces.
2. No business, service, or industry shall be carried on within a private
garage;
3. Private garages shall not be used for the storage of more than one (1)
commercial vehicle owned or operated by a resident per dwelling
unit.
(b) In the R-4 district, the following shall apply:
(i) Accessory storage buildings in manufactured home parks, if not reviewed
and approved as part of a PUD, shall be conditionally permitted subject to
the following additional requirements:
1. The storage building and any accompanying outdoor storage area
shall be for the sole use of the residents of the manufactured home
park and shall not be used by non-residents.
2. Accompanying outdoor storage areas shall be fully screened from
surrounding manufactured home units and adjacent properties.
(c) In all business and industrial districts, commercial or business buildings and
structures for a use accessory to the principal use is permitted provided that:
(i) In all districts except I-2, such use shall not exceed thirty (30) percent of
the gross floor space of the principal use.
(ii) In the I-2 district, such use shall not exceed forty (40) percent of the gross
floor space of the principal use.
(4) Adult Use/Accessory Activities provided that:
(a) Activities classified as obscene as defined by Minnesota Statute 617.241 are
not permitted and are prohibited.
(b) An adult use which does not qualify as an accessory use shall be classified as
an adult use/principal.
(c) Adult use/accessory activities shall be prohibited from locating in any
building which is also utilized for residential purposes.
MN Statute 617.241
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.4 Temporary Uses
Subsection (A) Purpose
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 323
2. In all cases, large trash handling and recycling collection areas shall
be at least six feet from a side or rear lot line, and shall not be located
within front yards or corner side yards.
(iv) Design Materials
If a wall or detached accessory structure is used to screen or define a large
trash handling and recycling collection area, the building materials used
for the wall or accessory structure shall be compatible with the principal
structure and be readily served through swinging doors.
(v) Ground Surface Requirements
Areas intended for large trash handling and recycling collection areas
shall be surfaced with concrete that meets or exceeds minimum City
standards.
(vi) Drainage
Eating establishments and other uses that produce significant amounts of
liquid waste shall configure areas intended for large trash handling and
recycling collection areas to drain to the sanitary sewer system through
grease traps or similar devices as required by the Community
Development Department.
(31) Wind Energy Conversion System – Commercial
All commercial WECS systems shall adhere to the requirements of Section 4.12
in this ordinance.
(32) Wind Energy Conversion System – Non-commercial
(a) Non-commercial WECS systems shall have a total height of less than 200
feet.
(b) All non-commercial WECS systems shall adhere to the requirements of
Section 4.12 in this ordinance.
5.4 Temporary Uses
(A) Purpose
This section allows for the establishment of certain temporary uses of limited duration
and special events, provided that such uses comply with the standards in this subsection
and are discontinued upon the expiration of a set time period. Temporary uses and
special events shall not involve the construction or alteration of any permanent building
or structure.
Section 4.12: Wind
Energy Conversion
Systems
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.4 Temporary Uses
Subsection (C) General Standards for Temporary Uses
Page 324 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(B) Permit Required
Temporary uses and structures that require a permit shall be reviewed in accordance
with the process outlined in Section 2.4(L), Temporary Use Permits; and if a building
permit is also necessary, in accordance with Section 2.4(I), Building Permits.
(C) General Standards for Temporary Uses
Temporary uses, structures, or events shall comply with the following:
(1) Obtain the appropriate permits (as required);
(2) Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the
public health, safety, or general welfare;
(3) Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site;
(4) Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential
neighborhoods;
(5) Not include permanent alterations to the site;
(6) Meet all the setbacks of the underlying base and overlay zoning districts, unless
expressly stated otherwise in this ordinance.
(7) Temporary signs permitted under the Code and associated with the use or
structure shall be removed when the temporary activity ceases.
(8) Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the
site;
(9) Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the
property; and
(10) Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event
to occur, as well as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic
movement associated with the temporary use, without disturbing environmentally
sensitive lands.
Section 2.4(L):
Temporary Use
Permits
Section 2.4(I):
Building Permits
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.4 Temporary Uses
Subsection (D) Table of Allowed Temporary Uses and Structures
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 325
(D) Table of Allowed Temporary Uses and Structures
Table 5-8 summarizes allowed temporary uses and structures and any general or
specific standards that apply. Temporary uses or structures not listed in the table are
prohibited.
TABLE 5-8: TEMPORARY USES & STRUCTURES
Temporary Use or
Structure
Allowable Duration
(per site) Permit(s) Required Additional Requirements
Temporary Structure
Construction Dumpster
(on public ROW/property) Until issuance of certificate
of occupancy or two days
following expiration or
finaling of a building permit
Yes Sec 5.4(E)(1)(a)
Construction Dumpster
(on private property) No Sec 5.4(E)(1)(b)
Construction Trailer Until issuance of certificate
of occupancy Yes Sec 5.4(E)(2)
Recreational Vehicle Use 1 month Yes Sec 5.4(E)(3)
Real Estate Office / Model
Sales Home
Until 85% occupancy of
the phase is reached Yes + Building Permit Sec 5.4(E)(4)
Temporary Mobile Cell
Site 30 days Yes + Building Permit Sec 5.4(E)(5)
Temporary Sign 40 days per year Yes Sec 4.5(I)
Temporary Storage in a
Portable Container 30 days per year Yes Sec 5.4(E)(6)
Tents, Canopies, Tarp
Garages, and Hoop
Buildings
30 days per year Yes Sec 5.4(E)(7)
Temporary Sale
Farmer’s Market
Continuous; up to 5
months per year on a
single site
Yes Sec 5.4(E)(8)
Garage/Yard Sale
4 days per event;
3 events total per calendar
year
No Sec 5.4(E)(9)
Temporary Merchant See Title 3, Chapter 10 of City Code
Wayside Stands 3 days per week No Sec 5.4(E)(10)
Special Events
Special Events
14 days per calendar year,
per parcel unless expressly
stated otherwise
Yes Sec 5.4(E)(11)
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.4 Temporary Uses
Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
Page 326 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
(1) Construction Dumpster
(a) The placement of a temporary construction dumpster or other trash receptacle
within a public right-of-way or other site owned by the City shall be subject to
standards in the Monticello City code as may be applicable.
(b) Temporary trash receptacles or dumpsters located outside public rights-of way
are not required to obtain a temporary use permit, but shall comply with the
following standards:
(i) Be located to the side or the rear of the site, to the maximum extent
practicable;
(ii) Be located as far as possible from lots containing existing development;
(iii) Not be located within a floodplain or otherwise obstruct drainage flow;
(iv) Not be placed within five feet of a fire hydrant or within a required
landscaping area; and
(v) Be located outside of any required tree protection fencing and the dripline
of existing trees.
(2) Construction Trailer
(a) Construction trailers may be permitted on a construction site provided that the
trailer is:
(i) Approved by the Community Development Department for location,
safety, and compatibility with adjacent properties;
(ii) Located on the same site or in the same development as the related
construction;
(iii) Not located within a required landscape area; and
(iv) Associated with development for which a valid Building Permit has been
or will be issued.
(b) The applicant shall be required to restore the trailer site to its previous
condition if the trailer is located off the construction site.
(3) Recreational Vehicle Use
(a) A recreational vehicle owned by a non-resident, guest, or visitor may be
parked or occupied by the guest or visitor on private property containing a
permanent dwelling unit for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days while
visiting the resident of the property.
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.4 Temporary Uses
Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 327
(b) The recreation vehicle shall have self-contained sanitary facilities or standard
on-site facilities as required by the Community Development Department.
(c) The parking location of a recreational vehicle shall adhere to the requirements
of Section 4.8, Off-Street Parking.
(4) Real Estate Sales Office/Model Sales Home
One temporary real estate sales office or model sales home per builder or
developer shall be permitted in a section or phase of a new residential or
nonresidential development provided the office or model home:
(a) Is aesthetically compatible with the character of surrounding development in
terms of exterior color, predominant exterior building materials, and
landscape;
(b) Complies with the applicable standards in the approved development plan (if
applicable);
(c) Is operated by a developer or builder active in the same phase or section
where the use is located; and
(d) Is removed or the model home is converted into a permanent residential use
once 85 percent occupancy in the section or phase of the development is
reached.
(5) Temporary Mobile Cell Site
(a) A temporary mobile cell site may be erected after issuance of a building
permit in the case of equipment failure or testing, or for an interim period
(limited to 30 days) after a conditional use permit for a permanent cell site is
approved.
(b) Temporary mobile cell sites shall be removed within 72 hours following
completion of testing, the installation of the permanent tower, or resolution of
equipment failure.
(6) Temporary Storage in a Portable Shipping Container
Temporary storage in a portable shipping container shall be permitted to serve an
existing use subject to the following standards. A portable shipping container
shall not be located:
(a) On a lot without prior approval from the Community Development
Department.
Section 4.8 Off Street
Parking Regulations
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.4 Temporary Uses
Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
Page 328 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(b) In a required front yard;
(c) Within ten feet of any lot line or structure;
(d) In a manner that impedes ingress, egress, or emergency access; and
(e) On an individual parcel or site for more than 30 total days over any one-year
period.
(7) Tents, Canopies, Tarp Garages, and Hoop Buildings
Tents, canopies, tarp garages, and hoop buildings or similar membrane structures
shall:
(a) Obtain a building permit from the Community Development Department;
(b) Maintain a minimum clearance of 20 feet from all other structures and tents;
(c) Not exceed more than two on a single parcel (the Community Development
Department may approve more than two as a part of a special event on a
single parcel of 20 or more acres in size);
(d) Not be erected for more than a total of 30 days in any calendar year;
(e) Be limited to a maximum of three occurrences per parcel per year;
(f) Not be placed within required landscape areas;
(g) Not obstruct emergency vehicle access to adjacent lots or disrupt pedestrian
circulation; and
(h) The lot or site shall be restored to its original condition within two days of
removal of the tent, canopy, tarp garage, or hoop building.
(8) Farmer’s Market
Farmer’s markets shall:
(a) Be limited to the retail sale of agriculture, horticulture, or floricultural
products;
(b) Provide adequate ingress, egress, and off-street parking areas;
(c) Not reduce minimum parking areas below the minimum required for the
property under the City Code;
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.4 Temporary Uses
Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 329
(d) Not be located with any right-of-way;
(e) Renew all applicable temporary use permits annually.
(f) Be subject to the sign standards in Section 4.5, Signs.
(9) Garage/Yard Sales
(a) Garage or yard sales shall:
(i) Be limited to a maximum of three per dwelling per year.
(ii) Not exceed a maximum duration of four consecutive days per sale;
(iii) Occur only between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M.;
(iv) Not place items for sale, signs or other advertising within the public right-
of-way, or impede the passage of traffic on streets in the area of the sale;
(v) Conduct vehicle parking in accordance with the standards in this
ordinance and any other applicable City requirements;
(vi) Not negatively affect neighboring properties in terms of noise, trash,
parking, or impede the flow of traffic on nearby streets;
(vii) Not permit loud or boisterous conduct on the premises; and
(viii) Not allow unsold items or other sale-related materials to remain in public
view following conclusion of the sale.
(ix) Remove all sale related signage immediately upon conclusion of the sale.
(b) The owner and/or tenant of the premises on which a sale is conducted, shall
be responsible for the maintenance of good order and decorum on the
premises during the hours of the sale.
(10) Wayside Stands
A wayside stand shall:
(a) Be limited to the retail sale of agriculture, horticulture, or floricultural
products;
(b) Not exceed 750 square feet in area;
(c) Not be located with any right-of-way;
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.4 Temporary Uses
Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
Page 330 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(d) Be authorized in writing by the landowner if conducted on property not
owned by the operator of the wayside stand;
(e) Not operate for more than three (3) days per site in any given week;
(f) Not reduce available parking areas below that which is required by code;
(g) Provide adequate ingress, egress, and off-street parking areas; and
(h) Be subject to the sign standards in Section 4.5, Signs.
(11) Special Events
(a) Applicability
The procedures and standards of this subsection shall apply to all special
events that are planned for or which reasonably may be expected to attract
more than 100 persons at any one time (including but not limited to cultural
events, musical events, celebrations, festivals, fairs, and carnivals) held on
private property within the City, unless expressly exempted.
(b) Permit Required
All special events subject to this subsection shall have a temporary use permit
for a special event reviewed and approved or approved with conditions by the
Community Development Department in accordance with Section 2.4(L),
Temporary Use Permit, before conducting the special event.
(c) Exemptions
The following events or activities are exempt from the standards of this
subsection (i.e., may occur without a Temporary Use Permit for a special
event). Such activities are subject to all other applicable procedures and
standards of this ordinance.
(i) On Grounds of Private Residence
Special events or activities occurring within, or on the grounds of, a
private residence or on the common areas of a single-family attached,
townhouse, two- to four-family, or multi-family residential development.
(ii) Event Sponsored by City or State
Any event sponsored in whole or in part by the City or state.
Section 4.5: Signs
Section 2.4(L):
Temporary Use
Permits
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.4 Temporary Uses
Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 331
(iii) Event or Activity at Site Intended for Such Event or Activity
Any organized activities conducted at sites or facilities typically intended
and used for such activities. Examples of such exempt activities include,
but are not limited to, sporting events such as golf, soccer, softball, and
baseball tournaments conducted on courses or fields intended and used for
such activities; fairs and carnivals at fairgrounds; wedding services
conducted at reception halls, or similar facilities; funeral services
conducted at funeral homes or cemeteries; religious services, wedding
services, and funeral services conducted at religious institutions.
(iv) Event Approved as Part of another Permit
Temporary special events that are expressly approved as part of another
permit shall not require separate review under this subsection.
(d) Standards
In addition to the general temporary use criteria to be reviewed with the
permit application, the following standards shall also apply:
(i) False or Material Misleading Information
The application shall be certified by the applicant as not containing
intentionally false or materially misleading information.
(ii) Unreasonable Risk
There is a finding that the special event would not create an unreasonable
risk of significant:
1. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear;
2. Injury to persons;
3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances;
4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or
pedestrian travel;
5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash
removal, maintenance, or other public services demands; and
6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare.
(iii) Location Cannot be Accommodated
The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the
particular location requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event.
(iv) Time Permitted or Reserved for Other Activities
The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at
the same location in a manner that will negatively impact the public
health, welfare, or safety.
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.4 Temporary Uses
Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
Page 332 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
(e) Conditions
In approving the Temporary Use Permit for the special event, the Community
Development Department is authorized to impose such conditions upon the
issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize any
potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the
condition relates to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed special
event. The Community Development Department is authorized, where
appropriate, to require:
(i) Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and
egress.
(ii) Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of
glare or direct illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations,
smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and heat.
(iii) Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including
placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces,
including buffer areas and other yards.
(iv) Provision of sanitary and medical facilities.
(v) Provision of solid waste collection and disposal.
(vi) Provision of security and safety measures.
(vii) Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event.
(viii) Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities.
(ix) Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the
duration of the special event to a shorter time period than that requested
or specified in this subsection.
(x) Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary
facilities or structures used for such proposed special event will be
removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and
that the property will be restored to its former condition.
(f) Duration of Permit
A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this
subsection shall be limited to a maximum duration of 14 days per site per
calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Community
Development Department.
ORDINANCE NO. 529
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 - ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE
MONTICELLO CITY CODE FOR SECTION 2.4 – ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT
AND MAP AMENDMENTS; FOR SECTION 5.3 – STANDARDS FOR
ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES; AND FOR SECTION 5.4 –
TEMPORARY USES AND STRUCTURES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 2.4(B) of Title 10 - Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to add (2)
(c) and renumber accordingly:
2.4(B) Zoning Ordinance Text and Zoning Map Amendments
(2) Initiation of Proceedings
(c) Recommendation of the Community Development
Department; or
(cd) Action of the City Council.
Section 2. Section 5.3 (D) of Title 10 – Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows:
5.3(D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses
(2) Accessory Building – Minor
(b) In the R-4 M-H district, one minor accessory building for storage
of equipment and refuse is permitted for each manufactured home
provided the accessory building can meet all required setbacks, and
is designed of weather resistancet material that will enhance the
general appearance of the lot.
(3) Accessory Building – Major
(a) In all residential districts except R-4 M-H, the following shall
apply:
(b) In the R-4 M-H district, the following shall apply:
ORDINANCE NO. 529
Section 3. Section 5.4(D) of Title 10 – Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows:
5.4(D) Table of Allowed Temporary Uses and Structures
Table 5-8: Temporary Uses & Structures – Temporary Structure
Amend text for: Construction Dumpster (on private property)
Allowable Duration: 30 days without building permit.
Permit Required: No.
Additional Requirements: 5.4(E)(1)(b).
Table 5-8: Temporary Uses & Structures – Temporary Sale
Amend text to add line item for: Seasonal Sales
Allowable Duration: 60 days per permit/120 days per calendar year
maximum term.
Permit Required: Yes.
Additional Requirements: 5.4(E)(7)
Section 4. Section 5.4(E) of Title 10 – Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows:
5.4(E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
(1) Construction Dumpster
Under (b), add this item and text:
(vi) Be secured with a cover to prevent litter and debris from
escaping the dumpster.
(7) Tents, Canopies, Tarp Garages, and Hoop Buildings
(d) Not to be erected for more than a total of 30 days in any
calendar year; with the exception of those uses with valid
permits issued under 5.4(E)(12).
Add this new subsection to Section 5.4(E):
(12) Seasonal Sales
Seasonal sales shall:
(a) Be authorized in writing by the property owner if conducted on
property not owned by the seasonal sale operator;
(b) Not be located within any right-of-way;
(c) Not reduce available parking areas below that which is required
by code;
(d) Provide adequate ingress, egress and off-street parking areas; and
(e) Be subject to the sign standards in Section 4.
ORDINANCE NO. 529
Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage
and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council.
ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 9th day of May, 2011.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
____________________________
Clint Herbst, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator
VOTING IN FAVOR:
VOTING IN OPPOSITION:
Planning Commission Agenda: 05/03/11
1
8. Consideration to call for a public hearing on Amendment to the 2008 Monticello
Comprehensive Plan for the Adoption of the 2011 Monticello Parks & Trails Plan. (AS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission is asked to call for a public hearing on Amendment to the
2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan for the Adoption of the 2011 Monticello Parks &
Trails Plan.
As the Commission is aware, the updating of the Park & Trail Plan has been made
possible through a grant by Live Wright, an initiative of the Minnesota Statewide Health
Improvement Plan (SHIP).
The Park & Trail Plan will be considered by the City for incorporation by reference as an
Appendix to the Comprehensive Plan, similar to the Transportation Plan. NAC will also
provide recommended amendments to the actual existing text of Chapter 5 of the
Comprehensive Plan. Both the adoption of the Plan document and the text amendments
to the Comprehensive Plan require a public hearing by the Planning Commission and a
super majority vote of the City Council.
Included with this staff report is a detailed timeline relating to the review and adoption of
the Park & Trail plan. Primary to the review are two important dates, May 17th and May
24th.
On May 17th, the Planning Commission will be asked to attend a community workshop
on the draft Park & Trail Plan. This is the public’s opportunity to see and comment on
concepts for Monticello’s future parks and trails, as well as provide feedback on needs
and desires for the existing and future system. The community workshop is scheduled
for 7:00-9:00 PM in the Mississippi Room. It will be held following the Special Meeting
previously called by the Commission at 6:00 PM, which is a workshop for the
formulation of 2011-2012 Planning Commission Goals & Objectives.
Then, on May 23rd, Planning Commission is asked to attend a joint session with the City
Council and Parks Commission. This special meeting of the Council will be a chance for
the three groups to review the plan in its entirety. The three groups will also see a
demonstration of the new interactive Park & Trail online map feature.
Both of these meetings will be posted for a quorum of the Commission.
Accompanying this staff report is Draft #2 of the Park & Trail Plan. The Planning
Commission is asked to review this document fully for the May 3rd regular meeting. The
comments and questions of the Commission will be addressed during the May 3rd
Planning Commission meeting. Feedback of the Commission will then be incorporated
for inclusion in the Draft #3 document, which will be provided in the packet for the June
3rd public hearing.
Planning Commission Agenda: 05/03/11
2
Planning Commission will note that NAC and staff have a full schedule of review and
recommendation meetings leading up to the May 17th workshop. These include meetings
with the Embracing Downtown consultant team, Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory
Council representatives, School District Athletic Director, and various meetings with the
Parks Commission and MCC Advisory Board. All of these will assist in the
development of a coordinated, well-rounded Park & Trail plan.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to call for a public hearing on June 7th, 2011 for Amendment to the 2008
Monticello Comprehensive Plan for the Adoption of the 2011 Monticello Parks &
Trails Plan.
2. Motion of other as directed by the Planning Commission.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative 1 above.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Draft #2 – Monticello Park & Trail Plan
B. NAC Memo – Park Survey Results
C. Park Survey Tabulation Results
D. Monticello Comprehensive Plan Chapter 5 – Parks
E. Park & Trail Plan Review and Adoption Timeline
1
2
Monticello
Parks and Pathways
System Plan
2011
Draft
Version 7
Print Date 4/28/2011
3
Monticello Parks Plan
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
a. Background
b. Summary of Existing System and Previous Planning
c. Coordination with LiveWright and SHIP Objectives
d. Coordination with Comprehensive Plan Goals and Directives
II. Existing Parks and Recreation Systems in Monticello
a. System Components
i. Regional Parks and Recreation Facilities
1. Bertram Lakes Regional Park
2. Monticello Community Center
3. Montissippi County Park
ii. Community Parks and Recreation Facilities
1. Xcel Energy Athletic Fields
2. Freeway Fields
3. Monticello School District Athletic Facilities
4. Ellison Park
5. East and West Bridge Parks
6. Pioneer (Lion’s) Park
7. Swan Park (?)
8. River Mill Park (?)
9. Otter Creek Park (?)
iii. Pathways, Trails, and Sidewalks
1. Broadway Pathway
2. Identify Other Primary Links
iv. Neighborhood Parks and Recreation Facilities
1. Identify and List Existing Developed Parks
2. Identify and List Existing, but Undeveloped, Parks
III. Park System Objectives
a. Park Survey Results Summary
b. Parks System Public Input Summary
c. Park System Policies
i. Proximity
ii. Walkability and Linkage
iii. Facilities, Contents, Elements
1. Types
2. Distribution
iv. Pathways as Transportation
4
v. Pathways as Recreation System Elements
d. Design Standards
i. Park Components and Elements, by Type and Location
ii. Pathway Design, by Type and Location
iii. Specialty Elements, where appropriate
e. Other Park System Objectives
IV. Parks and Trails System Analysis
a. Park System Gaps
b. Park System Overlaps
c. Park System Functional Issues
i. Park Type
ii. Park Conditions
iii. Park Elements
d. Pathway System Gaps
e. Pathway System Design Issues
i. Type of Trail
ii. Trail Condition
iii. Other Pathway Issues
V. Parks and Trails System Plan
a. Future Parks System Needs
i. Changes to Existing Parks
ii. Future Park Locations by Function and Type
b. Future Pathway System Needs
i. Changes to Existing Pathways
ii. Future Pathway Routes by Function and Type
1. Main Pathway Routes
2. Loop Pathway Routes
3. Sidewalk Connections
VI. Implementation Options
a. Prioritization
b. Funding Options
c. Capital Improvements Programming
VII. Parks and Trails System Brochure
VIII. Integration of Plan with City’s GIS System
5
I. Introduction
a. Background
b. Summary of Existing System and Previous Planning
c. Coordination with LiveWright and SHIP Objectives
d. Coordination with Comprehensive Plan Goals and Directives
Introduction (Section Title – bold 16pt.)
The City of Monticello maintains an extensive system of Parks and Trails, with much of
the system’s development paralleling the growth of the community. The City’s location
on the Mississippi River resulted in the early development of riverfront park locations,
including Ellison Park, East Bridge and West Bridge Park, and the County’s
development of Montissippi Park at the west end of the community.
As the City grew, focus on park facilities shifted away from the river, and a series of
smaller neighborhood park facilities were added as new neighborhoods developed.
Responding to a growing interest in trail development, the City undertook a major
pathway project, establishing the pathway along the full length of Broadway /County 75
from the Meadow Oaks area on the east end of the community, to the west edge, past
Otter Creek. This pathway has been enormously popular, even though it is primarily a
single spine at the current time.
More pathway development followed as new transportation routes sprang up, with the
goal of providing off-road pedestrian and bicycle options along those routes, especially
in the areas of the schools.
Augmenting the downtown recreation options, the City partnered with the Army National
Guard to establish the Monticello Community Center in (year), introducing both indoor
and outdoor recreation opportunities which were locally unavailable to the community
members, including an indoor pool and water park, climbing wall, and gymnasium,
track, and weight facility, among other elements. The City and the School District later
cooperated in the development of an indoor ice facility attached to the Monticello Middle
School.
In the middle 2000s, park development focus shifted again, as the YMCA organizati on
announced an interest in selling its Camp Manitou facility to the west of Monticello.
Operated as a private facility, the 1,200 acres included a series of lakes, wetlands, and
native woodlands that were unique to the region. The City, together with Wright County,
embarked on an effort to acquire this acreage, a venture that is still in process. The
addition of the Bertram Lakes Regional Park to the local park and open space inventory,
and the costs involved in this project, have necessarily changed th e way the City will
need to plan for park development in the coming years.
Many of these projects were anticipated by a Parks System Plan that was adopted in
the mid 1990s. However, significant growth and shifting priorities have made that Plan
6
long since obsolete. Over the past few years, the City has experienced, along with the
rest of the country, a significant slow-down in economic development activity. That
downturn left a number of expected development projects idle or abandoned, and left
several park locations undeveloped.
During this period, however, Monticello has adopted a new Comprehensive Plan, and is
currently undertaking an extensive study of its downtown. These projects have
positioned the City for the expected rebound in the general economy, and this Parks
and Trails System Plan is a part of the City’s infrastructure planning necessary to ready
Monticello for a new era of growth pressure.
This Parks Plan has been supported with funds from LiveWright, a program of Wright
County’s Public Health Department. LiveWright has allocated funds from the Statewide
Health Improvement Program (SHIP), with the intention of pursuing and promoting
healthier lifestyles. In this case, park and trail planning is being undertaken to improve
residents’ access to physical activity, and thus, overall community health.
The strategy of the Parks and Trails Plan is to utilize the City’s long-term planning,
coupled with the extensive existing inventory of parks and recreation facilities, to create
a system that is accessible, efficient, and provides a full range of recreation
opportunities, accounting for variations in age, interests, and activity levels. At the
same time, a significant component of this project is to build in flexibility to the City’s
Parks and Trails infrastructure, allowing the community to adapt its facilities to changing
needs over time.
Significant contributions have been made to the preparation of this Plan, including the
following groups, individuals, and organizations:
Monticello Parks Commission
Monticello Community Center Advisory Board
Monticello School District
Monticello Community Education
Etc.
Etc.
7
II. Existing Parks and Recreation Systems in Monticello
a. System Components
i. Regional Parks and Recreation Facilities
1. Bertram Lakes Regional Park
2. Monticello Community Center
3. Montissippi County Park
ii. Community Parks and Recreation Facilities
1. Xcel Energy Athletic Fields
2. Freeway Fields
3. Monticello School District Athletic Facilities
4. Ellison Park
5. East and West Bridge Parks
6. Pioneer (Lion’s) Park
7. Swan Park (?)
8. River Mill Park (?)
9. Otter Creek Park (?)
iii. Pathways, Trails, and Sidewalks
1. Broadway Pathway
2. Identify Other Primary Links
iv. Neighborhood Parks and Recreation Facilities
1. Identify and List Existing Developed Parks
2. Identify and List Existing, but Undeveloped, Parks
v. Special Facilities
1. Moose Sherritt Ice Arena
The Monticello Parks and Trails System consists of five layers of facility types. These
types are described below, with a mapped inventory of each existing park in this class.
The mapped inventory is superimposed on an aerial photograph of the park, and each
entry includes a written inventory of park elements, where practical.
Regional Parks and Recreation Facilities (Section Title – bold 16pt)
The largest parks fall into a classification labeled in this Plan as Regional Parks and
Recreation Facilities. These parks are those that attract users from a wide area beyond
Monticello’s boundaries. Regional facilities commonly are larger in size, and/or have
specific elements not found in more localized parks.
Regional Parks in Monticello include the developing Bertram Lakes Regional Park (a
joint venture between the City of Monticello and Wright County), and Montissippi Park (a
Wright County Park). The Monticello Community Center also serves, in many ways, as
a regional park facility, in both its scope of service area and its unique recreation
elements. The Community Center is included in this section due to its role in the City’s
recreation system.
8
A map of the Regional Park facilities in Monticello is displayed below.
Regional Parks are often operated by higher levels of government, such as counties,
metropolitan-wide organizations, or park districts. Montissippi Park is an example of
this operational model. However, Bertram Chain of Lakes is a unique regional facility in
that Monticello and Wright County will share in the operation of the park, with each
jurisdiction operating a specific set of park elements.
Although a locally devleoped facility, the Monticello Community Center (MCC) also
extends its reach as a regional recreation facility, due primarily to the fact that such
facilities are relatively rare in the region. As such, the MCC attracts regular users from
many areas of northern Wright County and southern Sherburn e County.
9
Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park (Subsection title – UL 12pt)
Figure___. Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park
Source: WSB 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
Bertram Regional Park 90th Street NE 1,200 acres
(370 ac- city/county
owned)
Canoe Launch
Hiking Trails
Natural Area
Parking
Scenic View
Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park is a developing facility of what will eventually be
approximately 1,200 acres of natural woodlands, wetlands, and prairie, co mbined with a
series of improved active park spaces. The property also includes nearly 100 acres of
farmland. Bertram is being acquired and developed jointly by the City of Monticello and
Wright County from the Greater Minneapolis YMCA, which has used much of the area
as a day camp for more than 50 years.
The property includes a chain of four lakes, including Bertram, Long, Mud, and First
Lakes, which also serve as the source of Otter Creek, flowing to the Mississippi River
through developed portions of the City.
Plans for the Regional Park are evolving, but are expected to include a full range of
active and passive elements. A system of trails will connect all sections of the park
10
property, and the most active elements are expected to be located toward the north,
centering on the site of the day camp areas. These areas include a swimming beach at
the north end of Bertram Lake, and a number of other informal camp structures. The
City is also considering inclusion of a field-sports complex on the land which is currently
been farmed.
To date, the City and County have acquired about one-third of the total acreage, and
are in the process of working through the park design options for the property as a
whole.
As a part of the city’s parks system survey, Bertram Lakes received broad support from
respondents, and was the single most commonly visited park location in terms of the
number of different visitors. Also of note, many respondents identified Bertram as a
potential location for proposed improvements and new elements to be added to the park
system, indicating that Bertram’s more remote location was not seen as a negative
factor in the location of new facilities.
Montissippi County Park (Subsection title - UL 12pt)
Figure___. Montissippi County Park
Source: WSB 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
Montissippi County
Park
170 acres Picnic Facilities
Rest Room Facilities
Playground
Equipment
Fishing Pier
Paved Hiking Trails
11
Boat Launch
Trail Connection
Montissippi County Park is a 170 acre county park facility wholly within the boundaries
of the City of Monticello. The Park has several hundred feet of frontage on the
Mississippi River, including a boat launch and picnic grounds, and provides a wide
variety of passive recreational activities, including two miles of hiking and skiing trails.
Montissippi is a heavily used park by Monticello residents, based on comments in the
parks survey. Resident responses indicated a number of desired improvements and
additions to the park, which are being forwarded to County parks staff. For the City, the
primary comments related to access to this park, including better pedestrian and bike
access from the “Broadway” Pathway which runs along the south side of County
Highway 75.
Monticello Community Center (Subsection title - UL 12pt)
Figure___. Monticello Community Center
Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
Monticello Community Center 505 Walnut Street 2.08 acres Friendship Island
Community Garden
Leagues
Indoor Play Area
Indoor Ice Arena
Drop In Childcare
Basketball Court
12
Climbing Wall
Community Room
Concessions
Fitness Center
Indoor Pool &
Waterslide
Parking
Restrooms
Volleyball Court
Walking Track
A major provider of recreation facilities in the City, the Monticello Community Center is
situated on about four acres of property in downtown Monticello. The building includes
an indoor pool and water park, fitness equipment, climbing wall, a gymnasium and
indoor walking track. Other community uses also occupy in the building, including the
Army National Guard, Senior Center, community and meeting rooms, and the Monticello
City Hall offices and Council Chambers.
The Community Center received significant support and atten tion from the parks system
survey respondents. The MCC comments were indicative of much of the survey with a
large focus on water-oriented recreation, including a solid majority who encouraged
expansion of pool and water-park style facilities, whether indoor or outdoor. Another
aspect of this showed us a support for a “spash pad” facility. Respondents to the
survey who don’t use the MCC facilities cited crowded conditions (including pool, gym,
walking track, and fitness areas) as one of the primary factors, supporting the idea that
some expansion would increase facility use.
Community Parks (Section Title - Bold 16pt)
Whereas regional parks serve a population that typically extends well beyond the
boundaries of the City, at the Community Park level, the size and park elements serve a
community-wide population, very often because of specific aspects of the park itself.
Ballfield complexes are one common example of these parks.
Community Parks also are characterized by one-of-a-kind elements and will commonly
include parking areas to permit their use by members of the community that do not live
near enough to walk or bike. These facilities often serve a dual role in that they will also
play the role of neighborhood park to those living or working n earby.
In Monticello, nine existing parks have a community-wide role. The first six are the most
common examples of Community Parks, and include Ellison, East Bridge, West Bridge,
Xcel/City Athletic Fields, Freeway Fields, and Pioneer (Lions) Park. These parks
include community facilities such as ballfields, reservable picnic shelters, and in a few
cases, access to the Mississippi River.
13
The line separating a park’s definition as community or neighborhood can be a narrow
one, and the role of a particular park may change over time as its facilities change, or as
the neighborhood in which it is located changes in demographic makeup, even (for
some parks) the season of the year. As such, these definitions should be taken with
some measure of flexibility.
Three other parks, although smaller than typical for this class, also play a Community
Park role due to their unique elements: Swan (Mississippi) Park, with an extensive and
popular location for viewing the area’s large Trumpeter Swan population; River Mill
Park, primarily due to the popularity of its winter sliding hill; and Otter Creek Park, an
intersection of Otter Creek and oak savanna/native prairie which serves as a shaded
rest area along the City’s Broadway Street Trail near its current western terminus.
A map of the Community Parks in Monticello is displayed on the next page.
*** NOTE: Add Groveland Park to this list of Community Park facilities along with map
on following page ****.
14
Add location maps for each Community Park photo
15
Ellison Park (Subsection Title – UL 12pt)
Figure___. Ellison Park
Source: WSB 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
Ellison Park 811 River Street E 4.2 acres Trail Connection
Barbecues
Baseball Fields
Boat Launch
Canoe Launch
Community Room
Fishing Pier
Gazebo
Handicapped Play
Area
Log Shelter
Mississippi River
View
Natural Area
Open Space
Parking
Picnic Area
Picnic Tables
Playground
Restrooms
Rollerblading
Scenic View
Shelter
Trumpeter Swan
Viewing
Ellison Park serves as one of the City’s most important community facilities due to its
riverfront location and (sometimes barely) enough room to support community-wide
events. Ellison Park provides the City’s primary point of contact with the Mississippi
River through its boat launch, fishing pier, and visual proximity. It is also a major trail
location terminus from both the west and a sidewalk access from Broadway through the
New River Hospital parking lot.
16
East Bridge and West Bridge Park (Subsection title – UL 12pt)
Figure___. East Bridge Park
Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
East Bridge Park 119 River Street E 2.5 acres Trail Connection
Arboretum
Community Room
Gardens
Gazebo
Mississippi River View
Natural Area
Parking
Scenic View
Sliding Hill
East and West Bridge Parks are perhaps the most visible parks in the community,
flanking the Trunk Highway 25 bridge that spans the Mississippi River at the north edge
of the community’s downtown area. Both parks provide a variety of facilities, but
despite their proximity, have significantly different environments.
East Bridge is more passive in setting and use, with the exception of its extensive use
as a sliding hill during the winter season. Apart from this, the park is used for its views
and its gardens.
17
West Bridge Park has a much more active nature, including a playground facility,
reservable shelter, and more direct access to the riverbank, including a fishing pier. A
pathway connects the two parks under the highway bridge at the river, however, this
connection is somewhat inconvenient and uninviting at the current time.
Figure___. West Bridge Park
Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
West Bridge Park 107 River Street W 3 acres Basketball Ball Court
Canoe Launch
Community Room
Fishing Pier
Ice Skating
Mississippi River
View
Natural Area
Parking
Picnic Area
Picnic Shelter
Picnic Tables
Playground
Restrooms
Rollerblading
Scenic View
Shelter
Trail Connection
18
City/Xcel Athletic Fields (Subsection title – UL 12pt)
Figure___. City/Xcel Athletic Fields
Source: WSB 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
City/Xcel Athletic
Fields
2171 River Street W 14 acres Baseball Field
Bleachers
Concessions
Parking
Picnic Area
Restrooms
Shelter
Trail Connection
The City/Xcel Athletic Fields are the primary location for softball and youth baseball
competition fields in the community, with fenced, lighted fields and other amenities
supporting this specific use. The property is provided to the City for this use by Xcel
Energy, and as such, is operated, but not owned by Monticello.
Because the fields are fenced for competition, they do not lend themselves to multiple
use for other field sports such as soccer or lacrosse.
19
Freeway Fields (Subsection title – UL 12pt)
Figure___. Freeway Fields
Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
Freeway Fields 2331 Meadow Oak Avenue 5.5 acres Baseball Field
Little League Ball Field
Parking
Picnic Area
Rollerblading
Snowshoeing
Soccer Field
Trail Connection
Text description for Freeway Fields
20
Pioneer (Lions) Park (Subsection title – UL 12pt)
Figure___. Pioneer Park (Lion’s Park)
Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
Pioneer Park
(Lion’s Park)
5010 Fallon Avenue 16.3 acres Community Room
Concessions
Kitchen Facilities
Natural Area
Parking
Picnic Area
Playground
Restrooms
Rollerblading
Shelter
Trail Connection
Volleyball Court
Text description for Pioneer Park
21
Mississippi (Swan) Park (Subsection title – UL 12pt)
Figure___. Mississippi Drive (Swan Park)
Source: WSB 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
Mississippi Drive
(Swan Park)
121 Mississippi Drive E 0.09 acres Trail Connection
Mississippi River View
Natural Area
Parking
Picnic Area
Scenic View
Insert revised photo showing river frontage
Text description for Swan Park
22
River Mill Park (Subsection title – UL 12pt)
Figure___. River Mill Park
Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
River Mill Park 6332 River Mill Drive 7 acres Baseball Field
Basketball Court
Lighted Sliding Hill
Natural Area
Picnic Area
Playground
Restrooms
Shelter
Trail Connection
Volleyball Court
Text description here for River Mill park
23
Otter Creek Park (Subsection title – UL 12pt)
Figure___. Otter Creek Park
Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph
Park Name Location Acreage Amenities
City/Xcel Athletic Fields 1350 Broadway W 8 acres Gazebo
Trail Connection
Community Room
Creek Side View
Natural Area
Picnic Area
Scenic View
Text description for Otter Creek Park Here - along with changes to boundaries
24
Groveland Park (Subsection title – UL 12pt)
Insert park data for Groveland Park
Revise Map for Groveland Park to address format, etc.
Text description of Groveland park here
Insert Summary Discussion of Community Park issues here
25
III. Park System Objectives
a. Park Survey Results Summary
2. Please identify the amenities you or your family members use in the City parks. Select an option that represents the frequ ency of those
amenities you use from "Rarely Used" to "Often Used".
Rarely
Used
Occasionally
Used
Often
Used Rating
Average
Response
Count
Playgrounds 19.0%
(32) 1.2% (2) 19.6% (33) 6.5%
(11)
53.6%
(90) 3.74 168
Restrooms 12.6%
(22) 8.0% (14) 30.3% (53) 16.6%
(29)
32.6%
(57) 3.49 175
Picnic Tables 10.9%
(19) 6.3% (11) 41.7% (73) 16.0%
(28)
25.1%
(44) 3.38 175
Picnic Shelters 21.2%
(33)
12.8%
(20) 37.2% (58) 11.5%
(18)
17.3%
(27) 2.91 156
Community Center 8.5% (14) 4.9% (8) 17.1% (28) 11.6%
(19)
57.9%
(95) 4.05 164
Winter activities (sledding, skating) 22.5%
(36)
10.6%
(17) 36.3% (58) 14.4%
(23)
16.3%
(26) 2.91 160
Play Equipment 22.6%
(36) 6.9% (11) 13.2% (21) 11.3%
(18)
45.9%
(73) 3.51 159
Walking/Bike Paths 2.8% (5) 1.7% (3) 12.2% (22) 18.9%
(34)
64.4%
(116) 4.41 180
Pet Exercise 49.4%
(76) 4.5% (7) 11.0% (17) 9.7%
(15)
25.3%
(39) 2.57 154
Disc Golf 77.3%
(109) 7.1% (10) 7.8% (11) 5.0%
(7)
2.8%
(4) 1.49 141
Basketball Courts 57.0%
(86)
14.6%
(22) 19.9% (30) 4.6%
(7)
4.0%
(6) 1.84 151
Ball Fields 46.7%
(70)
11.3%
(17) 17.3% (26) 9.3%
(14)
15.3%
(23) 2.35 150
Boat Launches 54.4%
(81)
11.4%
(17) 18.8% (28) 6.0%
(9)
9.4%
(14) 2.05 149
Events (Music, Movies, Festivals) 13.1%
(21)
18.1%
(29) 40.0% (64) 20.6%
(33)
8.1%
(13) 2.93 160
Indoor Ice Rink 59.2%
(90) 7.2% (11) 16.4% (25) 7.9%
(12)
9.2%
(14) 2.01 152
Fishing Docks 41.2%
(61)
16.9%
(25) 19.6% (29) 12.2%
(18)
10.1%
(15) 2.33 148
Other Amenity (specify below)
b. Parks System Public Input Summary
26
Insert text discussion – highlight association comments, other public input
c. Park System Policies
i. Proximity
The City’s objectives for park system proximity will transition under this plan from what
was a heavy emphasis on neighborhood park and totlot access to more reliance on
fewer, but larger park facilities, with the focus of the syste m on the Bertram Lakes
facility and a more extensive trail system.
This policy reflects a number of factors, not the least of which is the extensive
investment necessary to acquire and develop the Bertram Lakes facility. However,
other prominent factors support this policy, including the following:
Park variety. In larger facilities, the City is able to provide a broader range of
facilities and elements, helping each park to appeal to a wider range of age
groups and users.
Maintenance and efficiencies. By focusing system growth on fewer, but larger,
distinct facilities, the City’s maintenance costs can be reduced by minimizing
travel time and other similar efficiencies.
Park acquisition can be phased in over time when future park locations are sited
to accommodate dedication by several development interests, rather than relying
on each development to provide its own separate park facility.
Fewer, larger parks creates a greater reliance on effective trail and pathway
connections, a design preference strongly supported by respondents to the parks
survey.
As such, the City’s park and trail acquisition efforts will focus on supporting the
development of a pathway system that provides access to primary trail corridors within
less than one-half mile to most residences. Access to the primary system will be via a
sub-system of sidewalks, some minor trail development, and including some on-street
trail marking where low-volume roadways can safely support this design.
As an implementation technique, the City may negotiate waivers from the sidewalk
requirements (when appropriate) in exchange for trail corridor dedications or other
related improvements consistent with the parks system plans.
Insert graphics illustrating proximity/expansion
27
In this illustration, a series of park
dedications is made to create a
single larger park facility that serves
a broad area of development, rather
than a series of individual smaller
park installations. The key to this
approach will be
(1) Siting park dedication areas
to accommodate future expansions
by dedication or acquisition from
neighboring development, and
(2) Preserving corridors to the
City’s trail system so residents from
the general community can utilize
the park through safe and attractive
pedestrian and/or bicycle access.
Park System Policies
ii. Facilities, Contents, Elements
1. Types
2. Distribution
iii. Pathways as Transportation
iv. Pathways as Recreation System Elements
d. Design Standards
i. Park Components and Elements, by Type and Location
Graphic illustrating Community Park – location, elements, exposure, etc
.
COMMUNITY PARK
28
Use: Area of diverse environmental quality which may include areas
suited to intense recreational facilities such as athletic
complexes as well as passive type areas, depends largely upon
the site location, suitability, and community need
Service Area: Several neighborhoods, 1 to 4 mile radius
Population Served: All ages, toddler to retiree, entire community for cities up to
25,000
Desirable Size: 20 to 35+ acres
Acres/1,000 Population: 5.0 to 10.0
Site Characteristics: Provides for a combination of intensive and non-intensive
29
development ranging from play equipment to trails. May
include natural features, such as waterbodies or forested land,
must include support elements such as restrooms, drinking
water, parking, lighting. Uses should complement those found
in a community playfield and should provide diversity in facilities
or use areas.
Typical Elements: Ballfields, tennis courts, ice skating rinks, walking trails, picnic
areas, off-street parking
30
Graphic illustrating Neighborhood Park – location, elements, exposure, etc.
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
Use: Area for designated active and passive recreation areas
Service Area: ½ to 1 mile radius to serve a population of up to 5,000 persons
(a large neighborhood)
Population Served: Focus upon ages 5 through 39 with emphasis upon ages 5
through 18
Desirable Size: 5 to 10 acres
Acres/1,000 Population: 1.5 to 2.0
Site Characteristics: Suited for multi-use development, easily accessible to
neighborhood population, geographically centered with safe
walking and bike access, may include school facilities
Typical Elements: Play equipment, walking trails, picnic areas, limited fields
31
ii. Pathway Design, by Type and Location
Primary Pathway – cross section, construction, improvements, etc.
Secondary Pathway – cross section, construction, improvements, etc.
Sidewalk – cross section, construction, improvements, etc.
iii. Specialty Elements, where appropriate
32
e. Other Park System Objectives
33
IV. Parks and Trails System Analysis
a. Park System Gaps
b. Park System Overlaps
c. Park System Functional Issues
i. Park Type
ii. Park Conditions
iii. Park Elements
d. Pathway System Gaps
e. Pathway System Design Issues
i. Type of Trail
ii. Trail Condition
iii. Other Pathway Issues
34
V. Parks and Trails System Plan
a. Future Parks System Needs
i. Changes to Existing Parks
ii. Future Park Locations by Function and Type
b. Future Pathway System Needs
i. Changes to Existing Pathways
ii. Future Pathway Routes by Function and Type
1. Main Pathway Routes
2. Loop Pathway Routes
3. Sidewalk Connections
35
VI. Implementation Options
a. Prioritization
b. Funding Options
c. Capital Improvements Programming
36
VII. Parks and Trails System Brochure
VIII. Integration of Plan with City’s GIS System
MEMORANDUM
TO: Monticello Parks File
FROM: Stephen Grittman
DATE: April 19, 2011
RE: Monticello Parks Plan – Survey Summary
NAC FILE: 191.10
This memorandum summarizes the information in the electronic survey conducted for
the Monticello Parks and Trails Plan between January and March of 2011. The survey
questions and a summary of the answer data is attached to this memorandum.
A total of 261 responses were received. Because the survey was conducted as an on -
line, voluntary response survey, most respondents skipped various questions. The
average question response number was about 75% to 80% of the total respondents.
In general, the responses indicated a highly favorable opinion of the Monticello Parks
system, and broad support for continued park development. The Bertram Lakes facility
was strongly supported by the respondents, with no negative comments received, and
some respondents specifically suggesting a “transfer” of resources from other, smaller
park facilities to encourage continued acquisition and development of Bertram Lakes.
The Monticello Community Center was also well supported, with as many as 70% of the
respondents indicated some use of the facility. For the MCC, the primary indication of
need related to interest in additional classes of various types and age groups.
Respondents indicated a desire for expanded gymnasium, running track, and fitness
facilities, and racquetball was the most commonly mentioned facility not currently
available.
With regard to the overall system, there were two primary categories of interest. The
first is a general interest in increasing water-oriented facilities. This ranges from
additional outdoor swim opportunities (sometimes voiced as beach, sometimes as
outdoor pool and/or waterpark), several requests for a “splash park” or splash pad
2
facility, and related to this – extensive interest in increased access to, and use of, the
Mississippi River. These interests were wide-spread throughout the survey, and
appeared to cross most of the demographic categories.
The second category of support related to trails and natural open space development.
In the questions offering an opportunity to increase trail development, this answer was
consistently chosen in the top tier of responses. Spe cifically, in Question 8 (a question
asking respondents to identify the highest priorities for new facilities), the top “Very High
Priority” response related to “Natural Areas such as nature trails . . “, and the highest
“High Priority” response was “Passive Community Parks with walking trails, etc. . .”
In other open-ended questions, trails were also highly supported. When asked in
Question 3 to identify the one amenity most wanted to be added to the park most
visited, the top individual response was trails (these options were self-identified, rather
than asking to choose from a list). Further, in Question 2 where respondents were to
identify the most commonly-used park system amenities from a list fo 16 items,
Walking/Bike Paths received the most responses, with the MCC second (these were the
only two with received an average ranking of greater than 4.0 on a scoring scale from 0 -
5).
Apart from these two categories, there were two notable aspects to the various
questions. The most commonly mentioned self-generated new facility was for a dog
park, which was mentioned more often than any other new amenity other than trails.
The second observation (not related to the first) is a strong interest in improvements to
Groveland Park, which received the highest amount of attention from the respondents.
Inclusion of Groveland in the list of Community Parks is supported by this interest.
Supplementing the Parks Plan to give some attention to the design and elements in this
facility would be valuable in serving its long-term role in the system.
Apart from these observations, the survey supports many of the objectives already
identified by the City and by the Parks Commission, which include the following:
Concentration of resources on the Bertram Lakes facility.
Refocus park system prioritization on larger, broad -impact facilities, rather than
many smaller neighborhood parks.
Extensive increase in trail development, from closing existing gaps to expanding
the reach of the trail system.
Focus on increasing access and use of water-oriented facilities, both natural and
man-made.
Increasing attention on natural areas for park and trail access, including passive
park design and development.
1
City of Monticello
Park and Trail System Survey
We want to hear from you! Please take a few moments to complete this survey. The
information you provide will assist the City of Monticello in understanding the park and trail
system needs and desires of the Monticello community.
1. Referring to the enclosed Park Location Map on page 7, please identify the frequency of your
park use in the community. Please indicate with an “X” your frequency of use and how you
arrive there.
County/City Parks Daily Weekly Monthly Yearly Walk/Bike Drive
1. Bertram Lake Regional Park* 2 7 23 57 11 72
2. 4th Street Park 1 10 16 30 10 38
3. Balboul Park 0 0 3 11 2 10
4. Battle Rapids Park 0 2 5 10 4 8
5. Cardinal Hills Park 4 2 3 13 7 10
6. Cardinal Hills Tot Lot 2 1 3 9 2 9
7. City/Xcel Ball Fields 3 10 9 16 5 28
8. Country Club Park 1 1 4 11 3 8
9. East Bridge Park 4 16 43 48 42 66
910. Ellison Park 5 29 63 44 47 91
11. Fallon Park 1 2 3 7 4 7
12. Featherstone Park 2 0 4 7 4 7
13. Freeway Fields 5 16 10 12 19 22
14. Front Street 3 9 10 14 19 11
15. Groveland Park 8 15 8 10 22 12
16. Hillcrest Park 3 10 6 10 16 12
17. Hunter’s Crossing Park 1 0 2 6 1 4
18. Meadow Oak Park 8 9 10 8 24 8
19. Mississippi Drive (Swan Park) 2 4 16 46 10 48
20. Montissippi Park** 17 46 61 25 43 99
21. Otter Creek Park 7 18 17 16 35 16
22. Parkside Park 1 3 2 7 6 6
23. Par West Park 5 4 7 9 13 10
24. Pioneer Park (Lion’s Park) 7 28 30 40 33 65
25. River Mill Park 3 9 7 10 18 11
26. Rolling Woods Park 1 6 1 6 8 4
27. Sunset Ponds Park 8 6 5 9 16 8
28. Water Tower Park 0 2 6 9 6 7
29. West Bridge Park 8 35 50 43 49 79
*Bertram Lakes is a facility jointly developed and operated by Monticello and Wright County
**Montissippi Park is a Wright County Park within the city limits of Monticello
2
2. Please identify the amenities you or your family members use in the City parks. Select an
option that represents the frequency of those amenities you use from "Rarely Used" to "Often
Used".
Rarely
Used
Occasional
Use
Often
Used
Average
Walking/Bike Paths 5 3 23 35 116 4.40
Community Center 14 8 28 19 96 4.06
Playgrounds 32 2 24 11 91 3.75
Play Equipment 36 11 21 18 74 3.52
Restrooms 22 14 53 30 58 3.50
Picnic Tables 19 11 74 28 45 3.39
Events (Music, Movies, Festivals) 21 29 65 34 13 2.93
Picnic Shelters 33 20 59 19 27 2.92
Winter activities (sled, skate) 36 17 59 23 26 2.91
Pet Exercise 76 7 17 15 40 2.59
Ball Fields 71 18 26 14 23 2.34
Fishing Docks 62 25 30 18 15 2.33
Boat Launches 82 17 29 9 14 2.05
Indoor Ice Rink 91 12 25 12 14 2.00
Basketball Courts 87 22 30 8 6 1.85
Disc Golf 110 11 11 7 4 1.49
Other Amenity (specify below)
3
2. (Continued)
17 Other (please specify):
Wide variety of responses to “Other” – nothing that was unique or dominant
3. If you could have one amenity added to the park you most often visit, what would it be?
Dog
Park
Ice
Rink
Splsh
Park
Ten-
nis
Play-
grnd
Field
sport
More
Trails
Horse
Trail
Sled
Amen
Outd
Swim
Rest
rooms
Picnic
Shltr
Other
1. Bertram Lake 2 1 1 1 2 1 a,k,p
2. 4th Street Park i 1
3. Balboul Park 2
4. Battle Rapids
5. Cardinal Hills 1 2
6. Card Hills Tot
7. City/Xcel Ball 1
8. Country Club
9. East Bridge 1 e
10. Ellison
11. Fallon
12. Featherstone g
13. Freeway Fld 1 h,l
14. Front Street
15. Groveland 3 2 1 1,j 2 2
16. Hillcrest n
17. Hunter’s X’g
18. Meadow Oak 1 j 1 o
19. Miss’ippi Dr
20. Montissippi 2 1 1 1 1 b,d,f.k
21. Otter Creek
22. Parkside 1
23. Par West 3
24. Pioneer 2 4 2
25. River Mill 1 2
26. Rolling Wds
27. Sunset Pds 1 3 c
28. Water Twr
29. West Bridge i 3 1 e,q
Any Park OK 6 4 1 7 2 m
Dog
Park
Ice
Rink
Splsh
Park
Ten-
nis
Play-
grnd
Field
sport
More
Trails
Horse
Trail
Sled
Amen
Outd
Swim
Rest
rooms
Picnic
Shltr
Other
3. continued below
4
a. Dirt Bike/4-Wheeler Trails at Bertram
b. Garbage Cans at Montissippi
c. Basketball Court at Sunset Ponds
d. Drinking Fountain at Montissippi
e. More BBQ Grills at E/W Bridge
f. Rope Play Structure at Montissippi
g. Existence at Featherstone
h. Improve dugout and bleacher area at Freeway Fields
i. Add hours to warming house at 4th Street, W Bridge
j. Younger play equipment at Groveland, Meadow Oak
k. Add Cross-country skiing at Bertram, Montissippi
l. Add parking at Freeway Fields
m. Add a fitness course anywhere
n. Improve backstop/sunscreen at Hillcrest
o. Benches at Meadow Oak
p. Improved canoe launch at Bertram
q. Add tow rope at East Bridge
Also Noted (non-specific locations):
a. More maintenance of landscaping in street medians
b. Creation of a pleasure garden with fountains, statutes, etc.
c. Some restroom comments related to adding running water, or permanent restrooms instead of
port-a-potties.
d. Create a screened gazebo as a picnic shelter/gazebo
e. Some splash-park comments included desire to have benches at edge of fountain for adult
seating, etc.
4. In your opinion, is there a particular park that needs improvement? Please indicate the name of
the park and the improvement needed.
Name of Park: Answers varied, reflected answers to Question 3.
5. Is there a place that you would like to walk/run/bicycle/skate, but no trail or pathway currently
exists? Please indicate a beginning and ending location, such as an intersection, park, or
building.
Trail Beginning: See map
Trail Ending:
6. In your opinion, is there a particular trail or pathway segment that needs improvement? Please
indicate a beginning and ending location, such as an intersection, park, or building.
Beginning Point: Answers reflected Question 5.
End Point:
Type of Improvement: Primary comments related to completing segments to get beyond neighborhoods
5
7. Please indicate how you feel about the following statements (check appropriate box).
Statement Strongly
Agree
Agree No
Opinion
Disagree Strongly
Disagree
Parks are important / essential to our community
for a better quality of life..
155 32 2 0 3
The primary focus of our City should be to
maintain and improve the facilities that we have
rather than build new facilities or amenities.
47 58 36 44 4
It is important to continue to add to the City
walking and biking path system.
96 61 19 12 3
It is important to create safer pathway crossings. 74 72 28 11 2
It is important to continue to improve water and
waterfront access.
53 65 58 11 1
It is important to continue to improve
opportunities to use and enjoy the Mississippi
River.
62 77 43 6 0
The City should increase its emphasis on flowers,
plantings and landscaping in the parks.
28 49 59 49 2
The City should add additional picnic pavilions in
the parks where possible.
29 63 58 34 2
Non-residents should pay a higher fee when
renting or using City taxpayer supported parks
and facilities.
45 62 37 25 17
The City should improve handicap access to City
parks.
22 34 119 7 2
8. Which of the following types of parks & trails do you feel are currently needed to better serve
community residents (check appropriate box to indicate level of priority)?
Park Type Low
Priority
High
Priority
Very
High
Priority
No
Opinion
Tot lots (small 1 - 2 acre parks with limited playground
equipment, benches, etc.)
89 46 13 26
Neighborhood parks (3 - 10 acres with ball fields,
playgrounds, basketball, tennis court, ice skating, etc.)
50 75 40 12
Active community parks (10 acres+ with lighted fields,
concessions, swimming facilities, tennis courts, etc.)
56 66 46 10
Passive community parks (10 acres+ with walking
trails, picnicking, playgrounds, wading pool,
geocaching, etc.)
38 82 52 8
Natural areas such as nature trails, wildlife viewing,
interpretive nature centers focused on rivers, streams,
ponds, wetlands, woodlands, etc.
45 59 66 12
Bicycle and pedestrian trails which utilize existing
public right-of-ways
51 66 51 10
Bicycle and pedestrian trails which utilize off-road
corridors and more natural settings
45 61 66 9
Bicycle and pedestrian trails which include markers
indicating trail distances
63 48 60 11
6
9. How satisfied are you with the current park facilities provided by the community (check
appropriate box)?
Very Satisfied Somewhat
Satisfied
Somewhat
Dissatisfied
Very
Dissatisfied
72 104 14 0
The following questions (10 - 14) relate specifically to the Monticello Community Center (MCC).
10. How often do you or your family members presently use the Community Center facility
(check appropriate box)?
Never Daily Weekly Monthly Yearly
18 30 59 56 29
11. If you use the facility, how do you get to and from the Center (check appropriate box)?
Walk / Bike Drive
29 170
12. If you never or rarely use the MCC, please tell us why.
Answers clustered in three areas: (1) Cost. (2) Hours and convenience. (3) Crowds and conflicts between
adult/children activities.
13. If you or your family members use the Monticello Community Center, please indicate the
specific amenities which you utilize (check all that apply)
139 Pool / Indoor Water Park 61 Gymnasium 27 Birthday Party Room
121 Walk/Jog Track 59 Indoor Play Area 22 Fitness Classes
93 Fitness Center 47 Climbing Wall 19 Drop-in Daycare
62 Special Events 42 Food / Concessions 14 Senior Center
11 Other (please identify) 11 responses related to specific events at the MCC.
14. Are there any activities which are not currently provided at the Community Center which
you or your family members desire. For instance, some which have been discussed are
racquetball courts, additional gymnasium, expanded water park, splash park, expanded
fitness center, or other activities you believe would be beneficial.
Answers clustered in 3 primary areas: (1) Water facilities – including outdoor pool, splash park; (2)
Increased access to classes and class capacity; (3) Expanded gym and addition of racquetball courts,
including expanded walking/jogging track.
7
The following questions refer to events, activities, or programs that you or your family may participate
in throughout the community (not just the Community Center).
15. Of the activities, events and programs listed below, which do you or your family members
currently participate in (check all that apply)?
64 Aerobics / Fitness 1 Cheer America 8 Learn to Skate
13 Community Garden 72 Movies in the Park 1 Friendship Island
33 Pre-school Programs 56 Swimming Lessons 10 Softball Leagues
5 School of Self Defense 22 Teen Activities 48 Youth Programs
16. Of the activities, events and programs listed below, which do you or your family members have
an interest in participating in at a future time (check all that apply)?
87 Aerobics / Fitness 4 Cheer America 33 Learn to Skate
36 Community Garden 86 Movies in the Park 16 Friendship Island
40 Pre-school Programs 57 Swimming Lessons 26 Softball Leagues
31 School of Self Defense 48 Teen Activities 69 Youth Programs
17. Are there any classes, events and programs not listed above which you or your family members
would like to see provided by the Monticello Community Center or Parks Department?
Answers varied widely, strong interest in classes of all sorts – Community Education, etc.
18. How satisfied are you with the current recreation programs provided by the community (check
appropriate box)?
Very Satisfied Somewhat
Satisfied
Somewhat
Dissatisfied
Very
Dissatisfied
55
108
11
1
19. Do you currently use the Mississippi River for any type of recreation? If so, how?
More than 100 yes responses – primarily fishing, with a large number walking and viewing river/wildlife, etc.
8
20. What types of activities, programming, or improvements would you like to see developed for the
future use of the Mississippi River (check all that apply)?
85 Kayaking 95 Canoeing
55 Organized youth fishing programs 55 Interpretive markers and signs
83 Nature programs 105 Tubing/Float Trips
Others? (Please identify) 12 “Other” responses – primarily related to enhancing river use.
21. For the future acquisition and development of major park facilities and improvements, the
community may consider the option of a property tax levy. Please indicate how supportive would you
be of such a levy by indicating a yearly amount that would be added to your annual property tax bill.
20 $0 11 $1 - $5 17 $6 - $10 4 $11 - $15 25 $16 -$20
18 $21 - $25 14 $26- $30 8 $31-$40 27 $41-$50 30 more than $50
Median Response - $23.50 per year
22. How do you prefer to receive information related to recreational classes, events and programs
to community residents (check all appropriate boxes)?
19 Cable Television 69 Direct Mail 141 Email
47 Fliers 6 Network Television 72 Newspaper
41 Social Media (i.e. Facebook) 4 Radio 76 City Website
23. Do you have any additional comments or suggestions related to the City’s park and trail
system?
See answers attached.
9
These last few questions will help us with an understanding of your family’s demographics so we can
better develop a park system that meets the needs of the community.
24/25. Please indicate the number of people in your household in the following age groups:
Age: 0-5 yrs 6-12 13-18 19-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 65+
Female
55
41
29
10
58
64
24
17
6
Male
63
38
27
21
48
62
24
18
5
26. What is the zip code of your place of residence?
__________
27. Do you live or work in the area (check all that apply)?
City limits of
Monticello
Monticello
Township
Other
Live
146
12
32
Work
73
8
110
Thank you for helping us improve Monticello’s park and recreation facilities!
Please return your completed, printed survey by January 31st to City Hall, 505 Walnut Street,
Monticello, Minnesota 55362. You may also fill the survey out online at:
www.Surveymonkey.com/s/MonticelloParksPlanSurvey (a link to this site is also available on the
City’s website at www.ci.monticello.mn.us)
Parks | 5-12008 Comprehensive Plan
Th e term “parks” does not adequately describe the breadth of the this
chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Th ere are many facets to the park
system in Monticello:
Parks are public spaces developed as places to play and gather.
Parks include facilities for organized and unstructured outdoor rec-
reational activities.
Parks provide a means of preserving open space, natural resources
and wildlife habitat.
Trails allow access to parks and connect individual parks into a sys-
tem.
Th e primary focus of the Comprehensive Plan is on parks owned and main-
tained by the City of Monticello. Th e Monticello School District, Wright
County and the State of Minnesota are also important providers of park,
recreation and open space facilities for the residents of Monticello.
Th e park system is an essential part of the quality of life in Monticello.
Parks play an important role in making Monticello an active and healthy
place to live. Parks are integral parts of Monticello neighborhoods. A
direct link exists between parks, recreation facilities open space, and
trails and the community’s of life. Th e future of Monticello, to a degree,
will be determined by its ability to attract new residents. People will view
Monticello and assess what it has to off er compared to other area com-
munities. Maintaining and enhancing an already strong park system is
one measure that can be taken to ensure Monticello’s reputation as an
attractive place to live.
Th e process of preparing the Comprehensive Plan did not seek to duplicate
previous eff orts of the City in park planning. Rather, the Comprehensive
Plan builds a strong link between community development and the provi-
sion of parks and recreation facilities.
5Parks
Chapter Contents
Park Standards ............................5-2
Current Park System ...................5-2
Comprehensive Plan Initiatives 5-5
Neighborhood Parks ...............5-5
Community Parks ....................5-7
Community Greenway ............5-9
Trails ........................................5-11
Park Dedication.........................5-11
5-2 | Parks City of Monticello
Park Standards
Parks and trails are classifi ed according to their use
and function. Th e information below is a summary of
typical park characteristics: classifi cations, park sizes,
and service areas. Th is section is intended to act as a
general guide to park planning, acquisition and use.
Th e standards are designed to assure that Monticello
residents have convenient access to neighborhood
parks and that the community has a range of active
and passive recreation facilities to meet current and
future needs.
Mini-Park
Use : Specialized park that serves a concentrated
population (i.e. tots or seniors) or geographic area.
Used in areas where geographic barriers prevent
access to a neighborhood park.
Service Area : Less than ¼ mile radius
Size : 0.5 to 2 acres
Location : Typically near higher density housing
that does not have access to a neighborhood park
or as a supplement to a neighborhood park.
Neighborhood Park
Use : Basic unit of the park system, developed for
both active & passive activities. Design criteria
should anticipate the changing demographic pro-
fi les of the neighborhood served, as to provide
appropriate facilities. Focus on informal and un-
structured activities.
Service Area : 1/3 mile radius
Size : 4-10 acres
Location : Easily accessible to the neighborhood
population with safe walking and biking access uti-
lizing trail networks. Parking facilities limited to a
minimum. Site should have well-drained soils and
not include topography of excessively steep slops.
Community Park
Use : Area designed for community scale recreation
either active (athletic fi elds, etc),. passive (picnic
facilities, nature study, etc.) or a combination of
both.
Service Area : Community wide
Size : 20-65 acres
Location : Site should be suited for community use,
be easily accessible to the population it is intended
to serve. Located near high traffi c areas such as
schools and major thoroughfares.
School Park
Use : Depending on circumstances, combining parks
with school sites can fulfi ll the space requirements
of other classes of parks, such as neighborhood,
community, athletic complex and special use.
Service Area : Driven by the location of the school
property.
Size : Variable - depends on function.
Location : Land should typically be suited for ac-
tive recreation use, but may also include natural
areas.
Linear Park/Greenway
Use : Trails incorporating ROW widening and land
acquisition long rivers and natural areas.
Service Area : Community wide
Size : Varies
Location : Along major river corridors, sensitive
areas and exiting roadways. Incorporate multi-use
and multi-modal trails.
Current Park System
Planning for the future begins with an understanding
of the park system in 2007. Monticello’s park system
currently includes 23 parks totalling approximately 108
acres. Th e location of each park is shown in the map
in Figure 4-1. Th e section that follows summaries the
basic characteristics of each park.
4th Street Park
Shelter
Rest rooms
Ball diamond
Tot lot
Skating facilities (with lighting) - recreational
skating and 2 hockey rinks
Off -street parking
Balboul Park
Play facilities
Parks | 5-32008 Comprehensive Plan
10
10
2
5
14
11
43
50
68
5
81
94
25
75
18
37
117
39
1
3
1
10
6
00
.
5
1
0.
2
5
Mi
l
e
s
Ju
l
y
1
1
,
2
0
0
7
Da
t
a
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
M
n
D
N
R
,
S
h
e
r
b
u
r
n
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
W
r
i
g
h
t
Co
u
n
t
y
,
a
n
d
W
S
B
&
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
.
Figure 4-1 - Existing Park and Trail System
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
1
4
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
r
k
2
B
a
l
b
o
u
l
P
a
r
k
P
o
n
d
s
3
C
a
r
d
i
n
a
l
H
i
l
l
s
P
a
r
k
4
C
a
r
d
i
n
a
l
H
i
l
l
s
T
o
t
L
o
t
P
a
r
k
5
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
C
l
u
b
M
a
n
o
r
6
E
a
s
t
B
r
i
d
g
e
P
a
r
k
7
E
l
l
i
s
o
n
P
a
r
k
8
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
F
i
e
l
d
s
P
a
r
k
9
F
r
o
n
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
r
k
10
G
r
o
v
e
l
a
n
d
P
a
r
k
11
H
i
l
l
c
r
e
s
t
P
a
r
k
12
M
e
a
d
o
w
O
a
k
s
P
a
r
k
13
M
e
a
d
o
w
s
P
a
r
k
&
P
o
n
d
s
14
M
i
s
s
i
s
s
i
p
p
i
D
r
i
v
e
P
a
r
k
15
M
o
n
t
i
c
e
l
l
o
C
i
t
y
B
a
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
s
16
M
o
n
t
i
s
s
i
p
p
i
C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
r
k
17
O
a
k
R
i
d
g
e
P
a
r
k
18
O
t
t
e
r
C
r
e
e
k
P
a
r
k
19
P
a
r
W
e
s
t
P
a
r
k
20
P
a
r
k
s
i
d
e
P
a
r
k
21
P
i
o
n
e
e
r
P
a
r
k
22
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
W
e
s
t
P
a
r
k
23
R
i
v
e
r
M
i
l
l
P
a
r
k
24
R
o
l
l
i
n
g
W
o
o
d
s
P
a
r
k
25
W
e
s
t
B
r
i
d
g
e
P
a
r
k
26
E
a
s
t
v
i
e
w
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
27
L
i
t
t
l
e
M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
28
P
i
n
e
w
o
o
d
E
a
s
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
29
M
o
n
t
i
c
e
l
l
o
M
i
d
d
l
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
30
M
o
n
t
i
c
e
l
l
o
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
31
M
o
n
t
i
c
e
l
l
o
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
32
M
o
n
t
e
C
l
u
b
H
i
l
l
5-4 | Parks City of Monticello
Picnic facilities
Natural area/open space
Battle Rapids Park
Natural area/open space
Cardinal Hills Park
Volleyball courts
Picnic area
Cardinal Hills Park Tot Lot
Tot lot play area
City/Xcel Ballfi elds
Lighted softball fi elds (4)
Bleachers
Shelters
Restroom
Concession stand
Country Club Manor
Playground
Ball fi eld
Volleyball
Picnic tables
East/West Bridge Park
Play lot
Gazebo
Picnic facilities
Skating rink
Warming house with rest rooms
Sliding hill
Off -street parking
Ellison Park
Shelter
Rest room facilities
Creative play area
Tot recreational equipment
Swings for the handicapped
Parking
Boat launch
Fallon Park
Open space
Freeway Fields
Soccer/football fi eld
Basketball court
Little league ball fi eld
Softball fi eld
Groveland Park
Youth football fi elds
Softball diamond
Play area
Shelters
Parking
Hillcrest Park
Skating facilities
Play lot
Picnic facilities
Ball fi eld
Meadow Oak Park
Picnic tables
Nature trail
Basketball court
Meadows
Natural area/open space
Mississippi Drive
Natural area/open space
Scenic river overlook
Swan viewing
Oak Ridge Park
Open space
Gazebo
Flower park
Otter Creek Park
Gazebo
Natural area/open space
Par West Park
Playground
Disc golf area (3 hole)
Basketball court
Picnic tables
Pioneer Park (Lions Park)
Play area
Community building with rest rooms
Picnic area with shelters
Parks | 5-52008 Comprehensive Plan
Off -street parking
Nature trails
River Mill Park
Playground
Lighted sliding hill
Ball fi eld
Shelters
Basketball court
Volleyball court
Soccer fi eld
Rolling Woods
Playground area
Basketball court
Sunset Ponds Park
Ball fi eld
Soccer/football fi eld
Comprehensive Plan Initiatives
Th e process of preparing the Comprehensive Plan
identifi ed a variety of initiatives related to the future
park system in Monticello. Th ese initiatives should
be considered by the Park Commission in its planning
eff orts.
Neighborhood Parks
Th e map in Figure 4-2 illustrates the areas served by the
existing park system. Each circle on this map represents
an approximate one-third mile radius. Th is map sug-
gests that there are no critical gaps in the distribution
of city parks. All neighborhoods have reasonable access
to some form of park.
Th e Comprehensive Plan does not show individual
neighborhood parks in areas guided for new residential
development. Instead, it is assumed that neighborhood
parks will be added as property is platted.
Th e following policies will guide City actions in the de-
velopment and maintenance of neighborhood parks.
Neighborhood parks are essential elements of 1.
Monticello neighborhoods. Neighborhood parks
are intended to be two to six acres in size.
5-6 | Parks City of Monticello
Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks a service area of 2.
one mile or less for a neighborhood park. Th is
service area must account for barriers created by
natural and man-made features. Th e goal is to
have a neighborhood park within walking or biking
distance of every home.
Th ere is a clear nexus between development and 3.
the need for additional parks. Th e City will use
the park dedication powers convey by State Law
to acquire land (or cash) to implement this Plan.
Th e City will require the dedication of desirable
locations for parks in all new subdivisions, unless
the subdivision is adequately served by an existing
(or planned) neighborhood park. Land received
by the City through park dedication must have the
capacity for park use. Dedicated land should not
be encumbered by steep slopes, poor soils, utility
2 5
14
68
9
4
18
17
39
106
Figure 4-2: Existing Park Service Areas
Parks | 5-72008 Comprehensive Plan
easements and other impediments to intended
park uses.
Parks should be connected by trails and sidewalks 4.
to provide walking and biking access for both neigh-
borhoods and the broader community.
Th e development, improvement and maintenance 5.
of the park system requires careful financial
planning. With park dedication providing a key
resource, this planning must be tied to ongoing
projections of future growth. Th is planning should
work to ensure that funding plans for the acquisi-
tion and development of the regional park do not
deplete funding for the rest of the system.
Timely development of neighborhood parks is es-6.
sential. Funding of the park system should provide
for both acquisition and timely development of
neighborhood parks. Th is objective may require
new fi nancial strategies. Finance tools such as
special assessments and housing improvement
areas would allow a park to be built at the outset
of residential construction.
Planning for neighborhood parks should also con-7.
sider the needs of rural residential subdivisions. A
less dense development pattern does not remove
the need for neighborhood parks, but may alter the
service area and location.
Community Parks
Th e acquisition and development of YMCA Camp
Manitou is the sole new community park initiative pro-
posed in this update of the Comprehensive Plan. Th e
illustration in Figure 4-3 shows a preliminary concept
for the development of this regional park.
This initiative meets a wide range of community
needs.
Acquisition of this property protects and preserves
critical natural areas. As Monticello grows, it is
important to preserve these areas for future gen-
erations.
Th e recent and future growth of Monticello creates
the need for more community recreation facilities.
Th e regional park provides the space to meet these
needs.
Th e park provides a wide range of amenities that
will attract new development to Monticello. Th e
5-8 | Parks City of Monticello
Active Park Use (26 acres)
Environmental Learning Center
Horseback Riding Stable
Parking Lot
Passive Park Use (11 acres)
Dog Park
Parking Lot
Passive Park Use (32 acres)
Frisbee Golf Course
Archery Range
Passive Park Use (11 acres)
Primitive Camping
Passive Use (40 acres)
Nursery
Passive Use
(40 acres)
Arboretum
Picnic Grounds
BERTRAM
102 acres
LONG
88 acres
MUD
27 acres
FIRST
15 acres
1/
8
t
h
m
i
l
e
s
e
w
a
g
e
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
b
u
f
f
e
r
Pi
p
e
l
i
n
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
P
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
B
l
v
d
.
A
l
i
g
n
#
1
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
B
l
v
d
.
A
l
i
g
n
#
2
Active Park Use (65 acres)
Phase I:a) Parking lot for approximatly 100 vehicles
b) 4 Softball fields 300’ base pads
c) 5 International size soccer fields
100 - 120 yds x 70-80 yds
Phase II:a) Parking lot expansion
b) 4 Softball fields 300’ base pads
c) 3 International size soccer fields
100 - 120 yds x 70-80 yds
Active Park Use (53 acres)
Campground / R.V. Park
Boat / Canoe Launches
Swimming Beach
Picinic Grounds
Rental Chalet
Cabin Camping
Playground
Fishing Pier
Amphitheatre
ENTRANCE
EN
T
R
A
N
C
E
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
1
2
3
0.5 mile
loop
1.0 mile
loop
Long Lake
Overlook
Mud Lake
Overlook
4.5 mile loop
(all 4 lakes)
First Lake
Overlook
OTTER
C
R
E
E
K
Otter Creek
Overlook
Wetland
Overlook
WETLAND COMPLEX
Long Lake
Overlook #3
Long Lake
Overlook #2
4.5 mile loop
(all 4 lakes)
Ridgeline
Overlook
0.5 mile to
overlook
1/8th mile sewage treatment buffer
0.75 mile
loop
Canoe Routes
Canoe Route
Adjacent Use: Low Density
Residential and Golf Course
Adjacent Use:
Low Density
Residential
Adjacent Use:
Low Density
Residential
Adjacent
Use: Low
Density
Residential
Adjacent
Use: Low
Density
Residential
Adjacent Use:
Commercial
Nursery
April 10, 2006
Adjacent Use:
Industrial
Figure 4-3: Concept for Development of Regional Park
Parks | 5-92008 Comprehensive Plan
park brings community-scale assets that benefi ts
new development and enhances the quality of life
across the community. Th ese amenities create the
setting that should be a catalyst for the quality of
neighborhood and housing stock desired by the
City.
Th ese factors help to create the nexus between de-
velopment and this regional park initiative. Th e City
anticipates using a portion of monies received from
payments in lieu of park land dedication to pay for the
acquisition and improvement of the regional park. Th e
Park Plan identifi es two types of parks designed to meet
the needs of the broader community.
Th e Land Use chapter describes how the park will relate
to adjacent development and connected to the broader
community.
Community Greenway
Th e Parks chapter reinforces the concept of a greenway
introduced in Land Use. As Monticello continues to
grow to the west and south, it has the opportunity to
establish a community greenway. Monticello has a his-
tory of protecting natural features as growth occurs. A
greenway builds on this commitment to create a con-
nected system of natural areas that ring the community.
Th e intent of this initiative is:
Th e corridors are a tool for preserving important el-
ements of the natural environment in Monticello.
Th e corridors provide public access and use to
these areas.
Th e corridors connect community parks.
Greenway corridors become part of the defi ning
characteristics and identity of Monticello.
Th e corridors provide routes for the trail system
and a means of linking parks, community facilities
and neighborhoods.
Th ese areas provide habitat for wildlife.
Th e map in Figure 4-4 shows a potential layout of a
community greenway system. Th is illustration is not
intended to show a specifi c plan, but rather the critical
elements of a community greenway. Th ese elements
include:
5-10 | Parks City of Monticello
10
11144
11
44433
5550
666888
5
8881
999 444
75
3999
10
0
0.5
1
0.25
Miles
MaMM
rch
13,
2008
Datatt
Souruu
ce:
MnDNR,
Sherbr
uruu
ne
Countytt
,
WrWW
ighthh
Countytt
,
andnn
WSB
&
Associcc
ates.
Figure 4-4: Potential Elements of Community Greenway
06
1
3
1
2
5
333333333333333333333
777777
1117
7
18
2255
Le
g
e
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
K
e
y
p
a
r
k
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
Parks | 5-112008 Comprehensive Plan
Linking park and open space destinations such as
Montissippi County Park, Mississippi River, larger
City parks (Ellison, Pioneer and West/East Bridge),
Downtown, YMCA property, and Pelican Lake.
Preserving and providing public use of key areas of
trees, wetlands and other natural features as part
of future development.
Using powerline corridors, trails and bike lanes to
fi ll in gaps where it is not possible to have natural
areas in the greenway.
A key next step in this initiative is to conduct a Natural
Resources Inventory (NRI). A NRI determines the type,
quality and location of natural features in Monticello
and the orderly annexation area. Th e NRI can be used
to identify key property to acquire for the greenway. It
will also be useful in identifying potential gaps in the
greenway that must be bridged with some other form
of public space.
Trails
A system of trails is an essential part of the Compre-
hensive Plan. Trails build connections, allowing people
to move through the community without a car. Trails
provide the means for using area wide parks and other
natural areas. Trails off er recreational opportunities for
Monticello residents.
For the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, continued
planning and development of the trail system should
be guided by the following objectives:
Trails must be
viewed as a system. Individual seg-
ments must combine into a network that connects
places within the community. Th ese connections
facilitate the movement envisioned by the trail
plan.
Trail development should be incorporated with
street construction. Th e construction and im-
provement of streets provides an excellent oppor-
tunity to build new segments of the trail system.
Where possible, the trail should be detached and
separate from the roadway.
Integrate trails into new subdivisions. Focusing
on trails at the platting and site planning stage
of development allows for routes that serve the
neighborhood and link with other elements of the
trail system.
Park Dedication
Th e use of park dedication is essential to achieving the
City’s plans and goals for parks, trails and open space.
In fact, it would be diffi cult for the City to acquire and
create the park system envisioned by the Comprehen-
sive Plan without park dedication.
Th e experience of Monticello and other cities clearly
demonstrates a nexus between the development of
land and the need for the municipal park system. Th e
development of land for residential purposes increases
the demands for parks, trails and recreational facilities
in Monticello. Th e development of land also creates
opportunities to preserve open space and natural re-
sources.
Th e Comprehensive Plan establishes a system of neigh-
borhood and community oriented facilities. Monies
received from payments in lieu of dedication shall be
used pursuant to the park plan to meet the needs of the
park system. Th e demands on the park system from
new development are not tied to physical proximity of
a subdivision making dedication. New residents may
also be served by the development of parks and trails
and the preservation of open space in other parts of
Monticello.
Th e overall plan for the park system seeks to provide ev-
ery resident with reasonable access to the park system.
In implementing the Comprehensive Plan, the City will
work to distribute neighborhood parks throughout
the community. Community parks and recreational
facilities will be developed at locations appropriate for
the function of each park. Park dedication allows the
fl exibility to:
Acquire land suitable for parks in both location
and character.
Acquire land for trails that connect neighbor-
hoods with the park system and other community
destinations.
Acquire and preserve natural resources areas and to
connect these areas into a community greenway.
5-12 | Parks City of Monticello
Accept cash payments in lieu of dedication where
land from a subdivision does not meet the park
development needs and plans of the City.
Each proposed plat should be carefully reviewed to
determine if the subdivision contains land that should
be dedicated to implement the park plan. If the dedi-
cation of land does not satisfy the requirements of the
park dedication ordinance, then the City should receive
a cash payment in lieu of dedication.
State Law (Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.358, Sub-
division 2b) authorizes the City to require the dedica-
tion of land for the purposes of this plan as part of the
subdivision and platting of land. Th e City has adopted
an ordinance that establishes regulations for the use of
park dedication. Th is ordinance should be reviewed
from time-to-time to ensure consistency with State
Law and the Comprehensive Plan.
1
CITY OF MONTICELLO
PARK & TRAIL PLAN REVIEW & ADOPTION TIMELINE
April 20th
Parks Commission meeting
o Comments on 3/24/11 Parks & Trail Plan Draft 1
o Review of latest Park & Trail Plan concepts for comment
o Review of survey tabulation results
April 26th
Staff meeting (Tom Pawelk, Angela Schumann, Jeff O’Neill, Kitty Baltos)
o Park & Trail Plan Draft 2 due to staff, to include:
Policy Statements
Park Facilities Plan - Type, Location, Phasing
Trail & Pathway Plan
Greenways Plan
Phasing and Capital Improvement Plan
Appendix: Data
Distribute Draft 2 to Parks Commission
Distribute Draft 2 to MCC Advisory Board
Distribute Draft 2 to City staff
May 3rd
Meeting with Gary Revnick, Monticello School District Athletic Director
Meeting with Bertram Chain of Lakes team, (Chair, staff)
Meeting with Embracing Downtown Planning/Engineering Consultant
Planning Commission meeting
o Comments on Parks & Trail Plan Draft 2
o Review of survey tabulation results
May 17th
Park & Trail Plan Community Workshop
Staff comments due to NAC
May 23rd
Park & Trail Plan Draft 3 due to staff
This draft to incorporate input/comments from:
o Parks Commission
o Embracing Downtown team
2
o Bertram Chain of Lakes team
o Monticello School District
o MCC Advisory Board
o Community Workshop
o City staff
Distribute Draft 3 to Parks Commission
Distribute Draft 3 to MCC Advisory Board
Distribute Draft 3 to Planning Commission
Distribute Draft 3 to City Council
City Council Workshop – Park & Trail Plan
o Joint session with Planning, Parks Commission, MCC Advisory Board
May 26th
Parks Commission formal review and recommendation on Park & Trail Plan, Draft 3
Park Commission review of website applications
City staff comments/revisions due on park brochure to WSB
May 27th – June 2nd – NAC prepares FINAL DRAFT
May 31st
Staff meeting – final administrative revisions to Park & Trail Plan
June 2nd
Park & Trail Plan FINAL Draft due for inclusion in Planning Commission packet
June 7th
Public Hearing – Amendment to Comprehensive Plan for adoption of Park & Trail Plan
June 13th
City Council consideration of Parks & Trail Plan and Comp Plan Amendment
ADMINISTRATIVE TASKS DURING THIS TIME:
Parks Department to take pictures of all parks and all amenities
Creation of point of interest urls for website
Creation of content on individual park web pages
Grant follow-up
Planning Commission Agenda: 05/03/11
1
9. Consideration to call for a Public Hearing on Amendment of the Monticello Zoning
Map. (AS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
In the previous version of the Official Zoning Map, two annexed parcels were
inadvertently left of the map. The Planning Commission is asked to call for a public
hearing for the adoption of a revised map illustrating the inclusion of these two parcels.
In addition to the amendment for the excluded parcels, the map features a slightly re-
configured legend for ease-of-use.
The revised map will also illustrate the Special Use Overlay District (related to Adult-
Oriented Uses), as City Council adopted the overlay district amendments on April 24th,
2011.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to call for a public hearing on June 7th, 2011 for Amendment to the Official
Monticello Zoning Map.
2. Motion of other as directed by the Planning Commission.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative 1 above.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Official Zoning Map – Current 1/24/11
B. Proposed Official Zoning Map
County Hwy 75
Chelsea Rd
State Hwy 25
85th St NE
9 0th St N E
Linn St
Pine St
7th St
School Blvd
Riverview Dr
Cedar St
W River St
M
a
r
v
i
n
R
d
Jason Ave
Dundas Rd
W Broadway St
Hart Blvd
Country La
Haug Ave NE
Elm St
W 4th St
Fenning Ave NE
Oakwook Dr
Ma lla rd La
95th St NE
Fallon Ave NE
Edmonson Ave NE
Mississippi Dr
5th St
Country Club Rd
Sandberg Rd
P
e
l
i
c
a
n
L
a
F a l c o n D r
Fenning Ave
Walnut St
Oak Ridge Dr
Oriole La
Club View Rd
Broadway St
Hillcrest Rd
E River St
Headman La
M
i
l
l
T
r
a
i
l
L
a
Falcon Ave NE
Wright StBenton St
Elwood Rd
Ramsey St
6th St
River Mill Dr
Wildwood Way
Hilltop Dr
Mill Run Rd
O a k V i e w L a
Farmstead Ave
Martin Dr
4th St E
3rd St E
Red Rock La
Gillard Ave NE
Maple St
Fallon Dr
Willow St
View La E
Grey Stone Ave
Marvin Elwood Rd
Fieldcrest Cir
Fairway Dr
Jason Ave NE
Vine St
M e a d o w L a
Jerry Liefert Dr
Praire Rd
Starling Dr
Palm St
U
nkn
own
or
N
o
Streetn
ame
Fallon Ave
Golf Course Rd
Falcon Ave
Kevin Longley Dr
Craig La
R
e
d
O
a
k
L
a
Front St
5th St W
Thomas Park Dr
Locust St
M o c k i n g b i r d L a
W 3rd St
Eas
twood C
ir
Briar Oaks B lvd
F
a
r
m
s
t
e
a
d
D
r
Henipin St
E
i
d
e
r
L
a
Dayton St
Oak La
River Forest Dr
Meadow Oak Ave
Kampa Cir
O
a
k
R
i
d
g
e
C
i
r
M i l l C t
R i v e r R i d g e L a
Garrison Ave
Oakview Ct
Dundas Cir
Kenneth La
Otter Creek Rd
Minnesota St
Eagle Cir
Crocus La
Meadow Oak La
Stone Ridge Dr
Chestnut St
1 2 0 t h S t N E
Darrow Ave NE
Diamond Dr
Pebble Brook Dr
Widgeon La
Washington St
Bunker Cir
Homestead Dr
Thomas Cir
E
n
d
i
c
o
t
t
T
r
Center Cir
Oak View Cir
Sandtrap Cir
Country Cir
Cheyen Ct
Old Territoral Rd
Tanager Cir
Hillcrest Cir
Os p rey Ct
Acorn Cir
Balboul Cir
S
w
allo
w
C
ir
R iv e r si d e C ir
Meadow Oak Ct
Matthew Cir
E Oak Dr
S t o n e R i d g e C ir
Oakwood Dr
Meadow Oak Ave NE County Hwy 75
Hart Blvd
Marvin Rd
Marvin Rd
Wright St
Cedar St
Minnesota St
City of Monticello
Official Zoning Map
Zoning Districts
A-O
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-PUD
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
CCD
I-1
I-2
R-A (formerly R-1A)
T-N (formerly R-2A)
I-BC (formerly I1-A)
M-H (formerly R-4)
Other
Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District
Overlay Districts
CCD Residential Overlay District
Performance Based Overlay District
Water
1-24-11
County Hwy 75
Chelsea Rd
State Hwy 25
85th St NE
9 0th St N E
Linn St
Pine St
7th St
Sch ool Blvd
Riverview Dr
Cedar St
W River St
M
a
r
v
i
n
R
d
Jason Ave
Dun das Rd
W Broadway St
Hart Blvd
Country La
Haug Ave NE
Elm St
W 4th St
Fenning Ave NE
Oakwook Dr
Mal lar d La
95th St NE
Fallon Ave NE
Edmonson Ave NE
Mississippi Dr
5th St
Country Club Rd
Sandberg Rd
P
e
l
i
c
a
n
L
a
F a l c o n D r
Fenning Ave
Walnut St
Oak Rid
ge Dr
Oriole La
Club View Rd
Broadway St
Hillcrest Rd
E River St
Headman La
M
i
l
l
T
r
a
i
l
L
a
Falcon Ave NE
Wright StBenton St
Elwood R
d
Ramsey St
6th St
River Mill Dr
Wildwood Way
Hilltop Dr
Mill Run Rd
O a k V i e w L a
Farmstead
Ave
Martin Dr
4th St E
3rd St E
Red Rock La
Gillard Ave NE
Maple St
Fallon Dr
Willow St
View La E
Grey Stone Ave
Marvin Elwood Rd
Fieldcrest Cir
Fai
rw
ay Dr
Jason Ave NE
Vine St
M e a d o w L a
Jerry Liefert Dr
Praire Rd
Starling Dr
Palm St
Un
k
n
o
w
n o
r
N
o
S
tr
e
e
tn
am
e
Fallon Ave
Golf Course Rd
Falcon Ave
Kevin Longley Dr
Craig La
R
e
d
O
a
k
L
a
Front St
5th St W
Thoma s Pa rk Dr
Locust St
M o c k i n g b i r d L a
W 3rd St
East
wo
o
d C
ir
Bria r O ak s Blvd
F
a
r
m
s
t
e
a
d
D
r
Henipin St
E
i
d
e
r
L
a
Dayton St
Oak La
River Forest Dr
Meadow Oak Ave
Kampa Cir
O
a
k
R
i
d
g
e
C
i
r
M i l l C t
Ri v e r R i d g e L a
Garrison Ave
Oakview Ct
Dun
das Cir
Kenneth La
Otter Creek Rd
Minnesota St
Eagle Cir
Crocus La
Meadow Oak La
Stone Ridge Dr
Chestnut St
1 2 0 t h S t N E
Darrow Ave NE
Diamond Dr
Pebble Brook Dr
Wi
dgeon La
Washington St
Bunker Cir
Homestead Dr
Thomas Cir
E
n
d
i
c
o
t
t
T
r
Center Cir
Oak View Cir
Sandtrap Cir
Country Cir
Cheyen Ct
Old Territoral Rd
Tanager Cir
Hillcrest Cir
Os p re y C t
Acorn Cir
Balboul Cir
S
w
allo
w
C
ir
R iv e r si d e C ir
Meadow Oak Ct
Matthew Cir
E Oak Dr
S t o n e R i d g e C ir
Oakwood Dr
Meadow Oak Ave NE County Hwy 75
Hart Blvd
Marvin
Rd
Marvin Rd
Wright St
90th St NE
Cedar St
Minnesota St
City o f Monticell oOfficial Zoning Map
4-22-11
:
Mississippi Wild, Sce nic & Rec Overlay District
OVERL AY DISTRICTS
CCD Residential Overlay District
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!!!!!
Pe rformance Based Overlay District
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!!!!!
Shoreland District
OTHER
Water
Legend
A-O
R-1
R-2
R-3
M-H
BASE ZONING D ISTRICTS
Residential Districts
-- Low R esidential Densities
-- Med ium R esidential Densities
-- High R esidential D ensities
B-2
B-3
B-4
IBC
I-1
I-2
Business D istricts
Industrial Districts
R-A
B-1
T-N
R-PUD
CCD
Planning Commission Agenda: 05/03/11
1
10. Community Development Director’s Report. (AS)
Special Meeting – May 17th
At their last meeting, the Planning Commission called for a special meeting at 6:00 PM on May 17th
for a review and discussion of 2011-2012 Goals & Objectives. The Community Workshop for the
Park Plan has also been scheduled for that evening. As such, a special meeting notice and notice of
quorum will be posted for both the 6:00 Special Planning Commission meeting and the 7:00 Parks
Community Workshop, as Planning Commission is asked to attend that meeting, as well.
Interim Ordinance – Temporary Signage
To date, 19 temporary sign permits have been issued and staff has been monitoring their placement
and use.
There have been some minor issued with illegal placement in residential areas, which staff have
immediately addressed.
Adult Use Ordinance
The City Council unanimously approved the proposed ordinance amendments to the Adult-Oriented
use provisions on April 25th, 2011. As such, staff will be following up with required publication and
postings. The new ordinance should be available online by mid-May.
Census Info
The U.S. Census Bureau released the 5-year American Community Survey (ACS) estimates making
available social, economic, housing and demographic statistics for every community in the nation.
This release consisted of about 11.1 billion individual estimates and covered more than 670,000
distinct geographies. Prior to this data release, small geographic areas had to rely on outdated 2000
Census figures for detailed information about the characteristics of their communities. Commission
will be emailed a separate link to the data set for Monticello as the URL was too long to include here.
Detailed 2010 Census tract-level information for cities beyond these 5-year aggregates has not yet
been released.
Cargill Employees Support Bertram Lakes Restoration Project
Cargill Kitchen Solutions has made restoration of oak savannah at the Bertram Chain of Lakes their
employee contribution project for 2011.
Each year, the Cargill employees select a community project and contribute funds toward that project
during their annual employee event. This year’s event, to be held on April 30th, will support efforts to
restore an area of oak savannah on the park’s east side (in an area currently owned by the
City/County). Cargill Kitchen Solutions will also be able to apply for matching grant funds through
Cargill corporate.
This is a tremendous opportunity to work proactively on an area identified by Bertram Advisory
Council’s Technical Subcommittee for restoration. Council can expect additional updates on this
project as it takes shape. Many thanks to Cargill Kitchen Solutions for their support of this effort.
Planning Commission Agenda: 05/03/11
2
Embracing Downtown
The Embracing Downtown project continues to proceed in a positive manner. The consulting group
presented four concept plans to the Steering Committee, Downtown Stakeholders,
commissions/boards and residents. The concepts have generally been well received a nd continue to
create excitement about potential redevelopment in downtown. The next step will include selecting a
preferred alternative and beginning to work on the phasing and financing plan. A more specific
timeline will be established within the next few weeks.
TH 25 / CSAH 75 NE Quadrant Improvements
Construction has resumed on this project and is planned to be completed by the end of May. The
signal system at the intersection of TH 25 & River Street has been turned off and will remain off until
mid-May. The signal system at the intersection of TH 25 & CSAH 75 will remain operational
throughout the project, with the exception of a few hours while the old pole is disconnected prior to
removing it. Access to local businesses will be maintained at all times during construction.
TH 25 / CSAH 11 / CR 14 Intersection Improvements
Mn/DOT will begin construction on this project on June 6th. The plan is to complete the project by
September 2nd. Motorists will encounter intermittent lane closures on TH 25, and traffic on northbound
TH 25 will be channeled from two lanes to one lane south of Broadway for a period of 4 to 6 weeks
beginning after July 4th. This will likely cause significant traffic congestion, especially during the
evening rush hour. Access to local businesses will be maintained at all times. Mn/DOT provided an
article to the City for inclusion into our Newsletter, and they will be distributing letters to local
businesses before construction begins. More information on this project, including construction
updates and detour mapping, can be found on Mn/DOT’s District 3 web site at
www.dot.state.mn.us/d3.html.