Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Planning Commission Agenda 06-07-2011
AGENDA MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, June 7th, 2011 6:00 PM Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners: Rod Dragsten, Brad Fyle, Charlotte Gabler, William Spartz, and Barry Voight Council Liaison: Lloyd Hilgart Staff: Angela Schumann, Ron Hackenmueller, Steve Grittman – NAC 1. Call to order. 2. Consideration to approve the Planning Commission minutes of May 3rd, 2011. 3. Citizen Comments. 4. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. 5. Public Hearing – Consideration of a request for Rezoning from I-1 (Light Industrial) to B-2 (Limited Business) for Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Oak wood Industrial Park (101 Chelsea Road). Applicant: Quarry Community Church/City of Monticello 6. Public Hearing - Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4, Section 13 - Telecommunications Towers and Antennas, Chapter 5, Section 1- Use Table, Chapter 5, Section 2 – Use Specific Standards and Chapter 5, Section 3 - Accessory Uses Applicant: City of Monticello 7. Public Hearing – Consideration of an Amendment to the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan for the Adoption of the 2011 Monticello Parks & Trails Plan. Applicant: City of Monticello 8. Public Hearing - Consideration of an Amendment to the Official Monticello Zoning Map. Applicant: City of Monticello 9. Consideration to review a Final Stage PUD for Landmark Center. Applicant: Mielke Bros., LLC. 10. Community Development Director’s Report 11. Adjourn. Planning Commission Minutes — 05/03/11 BRAD FYLE MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:47 PM. MOTION WAS SECONDED BY BARRY VOIGHT. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. Recorder: Kerry T. Burri _ Approved: June 7, 2011 Attest: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Special Planning Commission Minutes — 05/17/11 MINUTES MONTICIELLO PLANNING COMMISSION — SPECIAL, 1MEETING Tuesday, May 17, 2011 6:00 PM Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Rod Dragsten, Brad Fyle, Charlotte Gabler, Barry Voight, and William Spartz Council Liaison Absent: Lloyd Hilgart Staff: Angela Schumann, Ron Hackenmueller, Steve Grittman-NAC 1. Call to order Commissioner Rod Dragsten called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. noting the full complement of the Planning Commission and the absence of the Council Liaison. The order of the items for consideration was reversed. 2. Citizen Comments None 3. 4 Consideration of adding items to the agenda None Consideration of Final Stage PUD for Amendment to Planned Unit Development for Quad Development The Planning Commission had recommended approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Veterinary Facility and an amendment to Planned Unit Development for Quad Development during its regular May meeting, contingent on a final stage review of this plan. The applicant provided the final building elevation plan for the proposed Monticello -Big Lake Pet Hospital for Commission review. Applicant Linda Jacobson provided color drawings of all faces of the building, a materials listing and materials samples. Staff noted that the materials are compatible with code requirements. Chairman Rod Dragsten opened the public hearing. The applicant answered questions about the color scheme, materials and signage on the existing freestanding monument. Hearing no public comment, the public hearing was closed. Special Planning Commission Minutes — 05/17/11 BILL SPARTZ MOVED TO APPROVE THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS AS PART OF A FINAL STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR QUAD DEVELOPMENT. MOTION WAS SECONDED BY BRAD FYLE. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 5. Consideration to adopt 2011-2012 Planning Commission Goals & Obiectives Workplan Staff asked that the Commission provide feedback, prioritization and estimate timeframe involved for the Goals & Objectives for 2011-2012 previously presented. The 2010 Census data reported Monticello population is roughly 12,800. The largest segment of the population is in the 0-5 years of age range. This information will guide the Planning Commission in determining the need for move up housing for growing families. Further Census details will be provided to the Commission next month and the Housing Report will be updated. Staff briefly described the various goals within the workplan. The Planning Commission identified several top priorities as part of Land Use Planning: a PUD Workshop, the Subdivision Ordinance, and the Transportation Plan. Planned United Development (PUD) Workshop Staff plan to complete a joint Planning Commission and City Council workshop aimed at developing a full understanding of the practical application of the new PUD Ordinance focusing on the collaborative components of the new code. Subdivision Ordinance The Planning Commission will complete a review and amendment of the Subdivision Ordinance in partnership with Engineering Department. Staff recommended tackling the Subdivision Ordinance in August of this year. This will allow time for the Commission to take a look at the Census data. The Planning Commission will provide input to the City Plans & Specs engineering update for 2012. Transportation Interchange Planning Staff pointed to the importance of defining a process for study and recommendations related to the Interchange Planning Area. The Commission was asked to consider it a priority to go through the review process as land uses and development options at Silver Springs have likely changed. Much of this planning will depend upon the priorities arising within the recently approved Transportation Plan. Staff expect a planning process to be determined by late summer and will provide reference documents related to an interchange planning area over next 4-6 months. Staff indicated that the Fallon Avenue overpass must to be completed before city gets approval for a new western interchange. The Federal Highway Administration prefers the 2 Special Planning Commission Minutes — 05/17/11 spacing of one mile or greater intervals for establishing an interchange Rod Dragsten represents the Planning Commission on the Transportation Advisory Council (TAC). Staff will attach TAC minutes to Community Development Report to keep the Commission up to date. TAC studies will be brought before the Commission as available. Staff pointed out that a number of the goals cited can't necessarily be prioritized but will be brought forward as appropriate. These goals were also outlined. Zoning Ordinance Interim Ordinances The Planning Commission will continue to monitor the impacts of the adopted Interim Ordinance for Temporary Signage and complete a year-end analysis for the purpose of provide final Sign Ordinance amendment recommendations. Zoning Ordinance Workshops In addition to the high priority PUD Workshop, the Commission will work with Performance Zone Overlay scenarios. DNR Overlay Amendments Staff noted that the City Engineer will be reviewing the Wild & Scenic and Shoreland Overlay District amendments prior to final review by the DNR. In addition, the Commission will adopt an amendment to the Floodplain Overlay District that provides consistency with State regulations and provides ordinances for future lakeshore development. The State collapsed three flood districts into two. Staff will get a first look at the revised maps soon. The DNR has requested a joint meeting with Community Development, Engineering and Emergency Management staff to review a draft ordinance. Code Tracking The Planning Commission will continue to monitor issues resulting from the adoption of the comprehensive amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and propose amendments as necessary. Already identified are Original Plat/Lower Monticello Standards and M-H/R-4 Revisions. There was also discussion about locating telecom towers and wind turbines 3 Special Planning Commission Minutes — 05/17/11 Embracing Downtown The Planning Commission will be asked to provide zoning code and TIF District input to the Embracing Downtown Plan. The consultants are in the process of revising the concept plans. Park & Trail Plan Staff noted that the Planning Commission will be kept apprised of the Park & Trail Plan and review draft plan documentation as it is available. The Commission will actively support and provide formal recommendations regarding implementation of Park & Trail Plan goals as part of land use initiatives. Public input will be included through workshops and hearings. Bertram Chain of Lakes The Planning Commission will be kept apprised of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Master Planning effort and review documents as they become available. The final concept plan for the Park may be impacted by the potential on-site involvement of the MN Youth Soccer Association. The concept plan for the passive area of the park will be available for public viewing at Family Fun Day at the park on June l ltn BARRY VOIGHT MOVED TO APPROVE THE 2011-2012 PLANNING COMMISSION GOALS & OBJECTIVES WORKPLAN AS DISCUSSED. MOTION WAS SECONDED BY BILL SPARTZ. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. Staff agreed to reorder the priorities of the 2011-2012 Workplan based on Commission discussion. There were also some questions about extending utilities to serve different portions of the City. Staff agreed to obtain information about the City's sewer capacity and suggested that it might be useful to ask both the Water and Street Departments to provide reports to the Commission in the future. 6) Adiournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:57 pm. Recorder: Kerry T. Burri Approved: June 7, 2011 Attest: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 11 1 Planning Commission Agenda – 06/07/11 5.. Public Hearing — Consideration of a request for Rezoning from I-I (Light Industrial) to B-2 (Limited Business) for Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park (101 Chelsea Road). Applicant: Quarry Community Church/City of Monticello (AS) Property: Lots 1 and 2, Oakwood Industrial Park The subject site is located east of Thomas Park Drive on the north side of Chelsea Road. Planning Case Number: 2011-013 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Map for rezoning from I-1 (Light Industrial) to B-2 (Limited Business) Deadline for Decision: July 8th, 2011 (60 days) Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: I-1 (Light Industrial) The purpose of the I-1, regional business district, is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: The approximately 5 acre site is currently platted as two lots. Lot 1, Block 1 was developed as a single story metal shell building that was used previously as a bowling alley. Lot 2, Block 1 was developed as parking to serve the bowling alley facility. North: 1-1 zoning - currently The Rink, an athletic and entertainment complex East: I-1 zoning - currently SMA, a light industrial use South: 1-2 zoning — former Simonson Lumber site, commercial West: B-2 and B-4 zoning — currently vacant parcels and Best Western Chelsea Inn 2 Planning Commission Agenda – 06/07/11 ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting a rezoning from I-1 to B-2 to accommodate the relocation of Quarry Church. Such use is defined as a "Place of Public Assembly" under the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. The City of Monticello is the current property owner of the site. According to City ordinance, recommendations and decisions on amendment to the Official Zoning Map of Monticello shall be based on consideration of the following criteria: Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error in the original text or map; or Whether the proposed amendment addresses needs arising from a changing condition, trend, or fact affecting the subject property and surrounding area; or Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with achieving the goals and objectives outlined in the comprehensive plan. This application request for rezoning meets both the second and third consideration for amendment as detailed below. Comprehensive Plan The subject site is guided (by the Comprehensive Plan) as a "Place to Shop". As the reference implies, such designation is intended to accommodate uses which are primarily places of commerce rather than places of work/employment. The rezoning of the site from an industrial designation to a commercial designation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use direction and resolves an existing inconsistency with the plan for that site. The subject site is bordered on the west by properties currently guided as "Places to Shop". Such properties ar e zoned as B-4 or B-3 districts. In contrast, properties to the east of the subject site are guided as "Places to work" and hold I-I and I-2 zoning designations. All of the parcels directly abutting the site to the north and east are guided for long term use as "Places to Shop". In this regard, the rezoning request continues the pattern of transition from industrial to commercial land uses as guided by the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning In terms of desired zoning designation, the Monticello Zoning Ordinance states that "the purpose of the B-2 (Limited Business District) is to provide for low intensity retail or service outlets which deal directly with the customer for whom the goods or services are furnished. The uses allowed in this district are to provide goods and services on a limited community market scale and located in areas which are well served by collector or arterial street facilities at the edge of residential districts." Given the purpose statement, the district allows such low intensity commercial uses as offices, financial institutions, and personal services (salons, spas, etc.) as permitted uses and then allows including restaurants, child care and vehicle fuel sales by conditional use. 3 Planning Commission Agenda – 06/07/11 In addition, the B-2 District allows an array of civic and institutional uses, including Places of Public Assembly. Given the types of uses allowed in the district, the rezoning to B-2 further supports the site as a transitional piece between higher intensity commercial uses on the west and the industrial sites to the east. Although traditionally the B-2 would serve most appropriately as a transition between residential and commercial zones, many of the types of uses allowed in the B-2 district can act as a buffer between the two uses in this area as well. Another factor for consideration is the need to prov ide zoning opportunities under the 2000 Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). As the Planning Commission will recall, during the updating of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Attorney recommended that the City make adjustments within some of the commercial districts to allow Places of Public Assembly as allowable uses. This recommendation was based on the passage of RLUIPA, which essentially compelled cities to accommodate religious institutions in districts where similar uses are allowed. The B -2 district was viewed as the most appropriate zoning district in which to permit Places of Public Assembly uses, as many no longer fit the context of residential neighborhoods, and likewise were not similar enough in character to the classic retail businesses found in higher-intensity commercial districts. It is noted that either the B-3 or B-4 designations would also meet the "Places to Shop" designation set by the Comprehensive Plan. However, given the City's strengthening of the B -3 as an exclusively auto -oriented district and the site's location well off of Highway 25, staff does not believe a B-3 designation is appropriate for the site. Rezoning the property to B-4 would not allow the Places of Public Assembly as either a conditional or principal use and was thus not requested by the applicant. Based on the preceding analysis, it is the opinion of staff that the B-2 (Limited Business) zoning designation is appropriate for the subject property. However , as a potential owner and user of a commercially zoned site, Quarry Church should be aware of the potential for conversion of other surrounding industrial properties to commercial uses. In addition to the existing athletic facility (The Rink), these could include higher intensity land uses such as restaurants, hotels, and retail uses, which generate larger volumes of traffic and other land use impacts. If the rezoning is granted, Quarry Church's intended use of the site as a religious institution is a permitted use and would require no other land use review through the Planning Commission. However, the site is currently being replatted into a single lot for sale purposes and to retain the required amount of right-of-way needed for the future reconstruction of Chelsea Road to an urban section. A trail easement for the continuation of the Chelsea Road pathway will also be required. 4 Planning Commission Agenda – 06/07/11 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt resolution 2011-46, recommending rezoning of Oakwood Industrial Park, Lot 1 & 2, Block 1 from I-1 (Light Industrial) to B-2 (Limited Business). 2. Motion to deny adoption of resolution 2011-46, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends rezoning of the property as requested. The rezoning request from 1-1 to B-2 is consistent with the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which guides the subject property, as "Places to Shop". In addition, as the Comprehensive Plan guides properties directly adjacent to the site on the north and east as "Places to Shop", a B-2 zoning designation is consistent with the conversion of the area from industrial to commercial uses. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2011-46 B. Aerial Site Image C. Site Zoning Map D. Site Long Range Land Use Map (2008 Comprehensive Plan) E. I -1 Purpose & Zoning Regulations F. B -2 Purpose & Zoning Regulations G. Monti cello Zoning Ordinance Use Tabl e CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011 –46 Date: June 7th, 2011 Resolution No. 2011-46 Motion By: _____________________ Seconded By: ________________________ A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE REZONING FROM I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO B-2 (LIMITED BUSINESS) FOR LOT 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, OAK WOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK. WHEREAS, Quarry Church has requested an Amendment to the Monticello Official Zoning Map for the rezoning of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for rezoning pursuant to the regulations of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 7th, 2011 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The application is consistent with the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan for Places to Shop. 2. The proposed amendment addresses needs arising from a changing condition, trend, or fact affecting the subject property and surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: 1. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.357, the application for Amendment to the City of Monticello Official Zoning Map for the Rezoning from I-1 (Light Industrial) to B-2 (Limited Business) for Lot 1 And 2, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park is hereby recommended to the City Council for approval. ADOPTED this 7th day of June 2011, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: _______________________________ Rod Dragsten, Chair ATTEST: ______________________________ Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator r. 0 y U) IT >� al O- c � O Lo c E L O N `f- (� Oa U 0� 0 y UOsU'owp3 1 L O- ®� O S�0 N `f- (� Oa UOsU'owp3 1 IR U L O. (B L 0) O a) ON anal UOSUOuap;3 U 0 ON anal UOSUOuap;3 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) I-1: Light Industrial District City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 117 (D) I-1: Light Industrial District Section 3.6 (D) I-1 Light Industrial District The purpose of the "I-1," light industrial, district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. Base Lot Area Minimum = 20,000 square feet Base Lot Width Minimum = 100 feet Typical I-1 Building Types Typical I-1 Lot Configuration CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) I-1: Light Industrial District Page 118 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance TABLE 3-16: I-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) [1] Max Height (stories / feet) Max Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Max Impervious (% of gross lot area) Front Interior Side Street Side Rear All Uses 30 15 30 15 2 stories 30 feet [2] (Reserved) (Reserved) [1]: When any yard abuts a zoning district other than I-1 or I-2, the setbacks for the abutting yard must be 50 feet. [2]: Multi-story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.4(D) contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in Title 4, Chapter 1 of the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Other Regulations to Consult (not all inclusive) Section 3.3, Common District Requirements Section 3.6(B), Standards Applicable to All Industrial Base Zoning Districts Section 4.1, Landscaping and Screening Standards Section 4.5, Signs Section 4.8, Off-Street Parking Section 4.9, Off-Street Loading Section 4.11, Building Materials CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.5 Business Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) B-2: Limited Business District City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 105 (D) B-2: Limited Business District Section 3.5 (D) B-2 Limited Business District The purpose of the ―B-2‖ limited business district is to provide for low intensity retail or service outlets which deal directly with the customer for whom the goods or services are furnished. The uses allowed in this district are to provide goods and services on a limited community market scale and located in areas which are well served by collector or arterial street facilities at the edge of residential districts. Maximum Residential Density = Ten (10) dwelling units per gross acre. Base Lot Area No minimum Base Lot Width Minimum = 100 ft. Typical B-2 Building Types Typical B-2 Lot Configuration CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.5 Business Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) B-2: Limited Business District Page 106 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance TABLE 3-11: B-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) Max Height (stories / feet) Max Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Max Impervious (% of gross lot area) Front Interior Side Street Side Rear All Uses 30 10 20 20 2 stories 30 feet [1] (Reserved) (Reserved) [1]: Multi-story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.4(D) contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in Title 4, Chapter 1 of the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Other Regulations to Consult (not all inclusive) Section 3.3, Common District Requirements Section 3.5(B), Standards Applicable to All Business Base Zoning Districts Section 4.1, Landscaping and Screening Standards Section 4.5, Signs Section 4.8, Off-Street Parking Section 4.9, Off-Street Loading Section 4.11, Building Materials CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 259 TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types “P” = Permitted “C” = Conditionally Permitted “I” = Interim Permitted Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements A O R A R 1 R 2 T N R 3 M H B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 C C D I B C I 1 I 2 Agricultural Uses Agriculture P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.2(B)(1) Agricultural Sales P 5.2(B)(2) Community Gardens P P P P P P P P P 5.2(B)(3) Stables C 5.2(B)(4) Residential Uses 5.2(C)(1) Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(C)(2)(a) - Duplex P 5.2(C)(2)(b) - Townhouse C P 5.2(C)(2)(c) - Multiple-Family C P C P 5.2(C)(2)(d) Detached Dwelling P P P P P P None Group Residential Facility, Single Family P P P P P 5.2(C)(3) Group Residential Facility, Multi-family P P 5.2(C)(3) Mobile & Manufactured Home / Home Park C C P C C 5.2(C)(4) Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities (public) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P None Active Park Facilities (private) P P P P P P P 5.2(D)(1) Assisted Living Facilities C P C P C 5.2(D)(2) Cemeteries C C C C C C 5.2(D)(3) Clinics C P P P C None Essential Services P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P None Hospitals C P P P C 5.2(D)(4) Nursing/Convalescent Home C C C C C C C C P P P 5.2(D)(5) Passenger Terminal C C C C C None Passive Parks and Open Space P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P None Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C P C C P P P C P P 5.2(D)(6) Schools, K-12 C C C C P C I I 5.2(D)(7) Schools, Higher Education C C None Place of Public Assembly C C C C P C 5.2(D)(8) Utilities (major) C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(D)(9) CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Page 260 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types “P” = Permitted “C” = Conditionally Permitted “I” = Interim Permitted Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements A O R A R 1 R 2 T N R 3 M H B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 C C D I B C I 1 I 2 Office Uses Offices P P P P P P P 5.2(E) Commercial Uses Adult Uses P 5.2(F)(1) Auction House C 5.2(F)(2) Auto Repair – Minor C C C P P 5.2(F)(3) Automotive Wash Facilities P C C 5.2(F)(4) Bed & Breakfasts C C C C C 5.2(F)(5) Boarding House C 5.2(F)(6) Business Support Services P P P P P none Communications/Broadcasting P P P P 5.2(F)(7) Convenience Stores C P P P 5.2(F)(8) Country Club C 5.2(F)(9) Day Care Centers C C P P P C 5.2(F)(10) Entertainment/Recreation, Indoor Commercial P P C C none Entertainment/Recreation, Outdoor Commercial C C C C 5.2(F)(11) Financial Institution P P P 5.2(F)(12) Funeral Homes P P P 5.2(F)(13) Hotels or Motels C P C P 5.2(F)(14) Kennels (commercial) C 5.2(F)(15) Landscaping / Nursery Business P 5.2(F)(16) Personal Services C P P P 5.2(F)(17) Recreational Vehicle Camp Site C 5.2(F)(18) Repair Establishment C P P P P P 5.2(F)(19) Restaurants C P P C 5.2(F)(20) Retail Commercial Uses (other) P P P 5.2(F)(21) Specialty Eating Establishments C P P P none Vehicle Fuel Sales C C C C 5.2(F)(22) Vehicle Sales and Rental C C 5.2(F)(23) Veterinary Facilities (Rural) C 5.2(F)(24) Veterinary Facilities (Neighborhood) C C C C 5.2(F)(24) Wholesale Sales P P P none CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.2 Use-Specific Standards Subsection (A) General Regulations Applicable to All Uses City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 261 TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types “P” = Permitted “C” = Conditionally Permitted “I” = Interim Permitted Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements A O R A R 1 R 2 T N R 3 M H B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 C C D I B C I 1 I 2 Industrial Uses Auto Repair – Major C P P 5.2(G)(1) Bulk Fuel Sales and Storage P P 5.2(G)(2) Extraction of Materials I I I 5.2(G)(3) General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(G)(4) Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(G)(5) Industrial Services C P 5.2(G)(9) Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(G)(6) Light Manufacturing C P P P 5.2(G)(7) Machinery/Truck Repair & Sales P P 5.2(G)(9) Recycling and Salvage Center C C 5.2(G)(10) Self Storage Facilities P C P 5.2(G)(11) Truck or Freight Terminal C P P 5.2(G)(12) Waste Disposal & Incineration C 5.2(G)(13) Wrecker Services C P 5.2(G)(14) 5.2 Use-Specific Standards (A) General Regulations Applicable to All Uses (1) Combination Uses In commercial and industrial base zoning districts, combination uses may be allowed within the principal building with each use subject to all regulations in this ordinance. Table 3-1: Base Zoning Districts CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011-46 Date: June 7th, 2011 Resolution No. 2011-46 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE REZONING FROM I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO B-2 (LIMITED BUSINESS) FOR LOT 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, OAK WOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK. WHEREAS, Quarry Church has requested an Amendment to the Monticello Official Zoning Map for the rezoning of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for rezoning pursuant to the regulations of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 7th, 2011 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The application is consistent with the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan for Places to Shop. 2. The proposed amendment addresses needs arising from a changing condition, trend, or fact affecting the subject property and surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: 1. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.357, the application for Amendment to the City of Monticello Official Zoning Map for the Rezoning from I-1 (Light Industrial) to B-2 (Limited Business) for Lot 1 And 2, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park is hereby recommended to the City Council for approval. ADOPTED this 7th day of June 2011, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Rod Dragsten, Chair ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 1 6. Public Hearing - Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4, Section 13 - Telecommunications Towers and Antennas, Chapter 5, Section 1- Use Table, Chapter 5, Section 2 – Use Specific Standards and Chapter 5, Section 3 - Accessory Uses Applicant: City of Monticello (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission is asked to review Chapter 4, Section 13 - Telecommunications Towers and Antennas, Chapter 5, Section 1- Use Table, Chapter 5, Section 2 – Use Specific Standards and Chapter 5, and Section 3 - Accessory Uses for the purpose of providing direction to staff for the preparation of potential ordinance amendments. In a review of the newly adopted zoning ordinances relative to these types of uses, it was discovered that telecommunication towers and antennas were not listed as an allowable principal use within the Chapter 5 use table, which then prohibits them completely by code as principal uses. This generated a larger discussion at the staff level about these types of structures as principal and accessory uses, permitted or conditional, in any zoning district, During the ordinance revision process, the text of ordinance section 4.13 was carefully reviewed by the City Engineer, FiberNet General Manager and the Public Works Director as pertaining to design and specific site standards. However, no specific recommendations were made regarding the most appropriate districts for tower and antenna location. As such, staff thought it important for the Planning Commission and Council to complete a secondary review this area of code and provide addition direction. To this point, staff offers the following items for consideration: 1. City Planner Steve Grittman has suggested that further differentiation within the code between antennas and towers may better serve the City’s interests, as the two are often quite different in terms of structure and placement. Separating towers, antennas and even perhaps the types of towers (radio/broadcast versus personal wireless) within the use tables themselves can help eliminate confusion during the review process. Standards for each would then de encapsulated separately within section 4.13. 2. The City may want to consider whether allowing antenna and/or tower structures as principal uses is appropriate in any district. As a principal use, the tower would be the only use on the property. It may not be the intent of the City to completely prohibit such towers as principal uses in the new code. 3. The City should consider whether tower and antenna status as a permitted accessory use in all zoning districts is acceptable. More likely, in some cases the City would want to allow such tower uses only as conditional uses. Planning Commission will note that radio/television broadcast towers and telecommunication towers already require CUPs (4.13(E) and (F), but there is an opportunity to further clarify the requirements in the use tables to eliminate any confusion about where such uses are permitted versus conditional. Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 2 Staff will provide additional information on the code and recommended clarifications during the meeting. In order to more closely examine these uses and the issues above, the Council did put in place an interim ordinance prohibiting tower and antenna placement until such time as adequate analysis can be completed. Planning Commission is therefore asked to review ordinance and provide recommendations on June 7th. From that point, staff will develop ordinance language for consideration at the July 5th meeting. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to continue the public hearing on an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4, Section 13 - Telecommunications Towers and Antennas, Chapter 5, Section 1- Use Table, Chapter 5, Section 2 – Use Specific Standards and Chapter 5, Section 3 - Accessory Uses to July 5th, 2011 and to direct staff to develop ordinance based on recommendations to be made by the Planning Commission. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No recommendation at this time. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4, Section 13 - Telecommunications B. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5, Section 1- Use Table C. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5, Section 3 - Accessory Uses D. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5, Section 3– Additional Specific Standards for Accessory Uses E. Interim Ordinance #530 CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas Subsection (A) Purpose Page 246 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (iii) Identify problem areas where shadow flicker will interfere with existing or future residences and roadways and describe proposed mitigation measures, including, but not limited to, a change in siting of the WECS, a change in the operation of the WECS, or grading or landscaping mitigation measures. (i) Decommissioning Plan; and (j) Description of potential impacts on nearby WECS and wind resources on adjacent properties. 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas (A) Purpose The City of Monticello acknowledges the legal right of telecommunication providers to locate within the City, and the need to accommodate the communication needs of residents and businesses. However, the City wishes to implement its legal authority to adopt zoning requirements which are nondiscriminatory, not intended to prohibit telecommunications service, and not based on health effects of radio frequency emissions. In order to establish uniform, nondiscriminatory regulations that protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the City, these regulations are intended to: (1) Minimize adverse visual effects of towers through careful design, landscaping, and siting standards. (2) Avoid potential damage to adjacent properties from tower failure and weather related occurrences through structural standards and setback requirements; (3) Maximize the use of existing and approved towers and buildings to accommodate new telecommunication antennas in order to reduce the number of towers needed to serve the community; (4) Utilize business, industrial and public land, buildings and structures for telecommunications whenever possible and/or appropriate; (5) Provide for the appropriate location and development of towers and antennas to accommodate the communication needs of the residents and businesses within the City of Monticello; CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas Subsection (B) New Tower Requirements City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 247 (B) New Tower Requirements (1) Prerequisite A proposal for a new telecommunications tower shall not be approved unless it can be documented by the applicant to the satisfaction of the City that the telecommunications equipment planned for the proposed tower cannot be accommodated on an existing or approved tower or structure within a one (1) mile radius of the proposed tower—transcending all municipal boundaries—due to one or more of the following reasons: (a) The planned equipment would exceed the structural capacity of an existing or approved tower or building, as documented by a licensed professional engineer, and any existing or approved tower or structure cannot be reinforced, modified, or replaced to accommodate planned or equivalent equipment at a reasonable cost. (b) The planned equipment would cause interference with other existing or planned equipment at the tower or structure. (c) Existing or approved towers and structures within a one (1) mile radius cannot accommodate the planned equipment at a height necessary for reasonable function. (d) The applicant has demonstrated that location of the antennas, as proposed is necessary to provide adequate coverage and capacity to areas which cannot be adequately served by locating the antennas in a less restrictive district or an existing structure. Information provided as part of the capacity analysis, that is a trade secret, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13.37, shall be classified as non-public data. (e) Other unforeseen reasons that make it unfeasible to locate the telecommunications equipment upon an existing or approved tower or building. (2) Future Co-location sites required New antenna support structures shall be designed so as to accommodate other users including but not limited to other personal wireless communications service companies. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City that opportunities will be made available for co-locating other antennas on the antenna support structure. CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas Subsection (C) General Requirements Page 248 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (C) General Requirements The following general requirements shall apply to all telecommunication towers: (1) Siting Provisions (a) Antennas shall be located on existing buildings and structures, if possible. (b) No part of any tower or antenna, nor any lines, cables, equipment, wires or braces shall at any time extend across or over any part of the right-of-way of a public street or a property line unless approved by the City in conjunction with a conditional use permit. (c) No tower shall be located within any utility or drainage easement. (d) If a tower is proposed to be within a park or golf course, the tower must be deemed compatible with the nature of the park or course. (e) If a tower is proposed to be located within a parking lot, the required monopole must replicate or substantially blend with the overall lighting standards of the parking lot. (2) Setbacks (a) In all zoning districts, the setback of any tower or antenna shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the district in which the tower is to be located, or the distance determined as the fall zone of the tower by a licensed professional engineer, whichever is greater. (b) In all Zoning Districts, no monopole shall be located within two hundred fifty (250) feet of an existing residence, or the proposed home location on an approved Preliminary Plat. No other type of tower shall be located within five hundred (500) feet of an existing residence, or the proposed home location of an approved preliminary plat. (c) Guy wires and anchors need not meet the required setbacks, but such wires shall be located on the principal property (property on which tower is located) unless otherwise authorized by a conditional use permit per the siting provisions in Section 4.13(C)(1)(b) above. CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas Subsection (C) General Requirements City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 249 (d) All towers shall be located in the side or rear yard of a principal structure of a property, whenever applicable. (3) Height Related Requirements (a) Towers located on existing buildings and structures (i) Antenna Height: Antennas shall not extend more than ten (10) feet above the highest part of the building or structure to which they are attached nor more than ten (10) feet above the highest roof elevation. (ii) Antenna Support Structure Heights: Except as permitted by conditional use permit, antenna support structures shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height above the maximum allowable building height for the zoning district in which the antenna support structure is located. (b) Freestanding Towers (i) Within a non-residence zoning district, no tower shall exceed two hundred (200) feet in height, including the extension of any antenna or apparatus. Within a residence zoning district, no tower shall exceed one hundred fifty (150) feet in height including the extension of any antenna or apparatus. (ii) Proposed towers up to one hundred twenty-five (125) feet tall shall be designed structurally, and in all other respects, to accommodate both the applicant’s antenna and compatible antennas for at least one (1) other wireless provider. Towers in excess of one hundred twenty-five (125) feet shall provide for a minimum of three (3) wireless users. Towers must be designed to allow for future arrangement of antennas upon the tower, to accept antennas mounted at suitable heights, and to locate all ground equipment of each provider within a single enclosed structure. (4) Design (a) Telecommunication towers shall be of a monopole design. This provision does not apply to amateur (short wave) radio towers or commercial and public radio or television towers. (b) No advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by federal, state, or local authorities. CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas Subsection (C) General Requirements Page 250 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (c) All towers, antennas, and accessory structures shall be in compliance with all City and State Building Codes, as applicable, and shall obtain all necessary permits. (d) Structure design, mounting and installation of the tower and/or antenna(s) shall be in compliance with the manufacture’s specifications, and installation plans shall be approved and certified by a licensed professional engineer. (e) Tower and antennas shall be grounded for protection against a direct strike by lightning and shall comply, as to electrical wiring and connections, with all applicable provisions of all State codes. (f) All towers shall be constructed of corrosive-resistant steel or other corrosive- resistant, non-combustible materials. (g) All towers, tower anchors and tower accessory buildings, shall be surrounded by security fences six (6) feet in height with a locked gate unless waived by the City Council. The City Council may require that a monopole be fenced. (h) All transmitting, receiving and switching equipment shall be housed within a structure or cabinet whenever possible, and shall adhere to the following: (i) If a new tower accessory building is necessary to house such equipment, it shall be architecturally designed to blend in with the surrounding environment, and shall be screened from view by landscaping as deemed necessary by the City Council. (ii) Accessory equipment associated with a rooftop antenna, satellite dishes, or wall antenna shall be located within the building, cabinet, or within a roof or ground enclosure which is constructed of materials and color scheme compatible with the principal building. (iii) All transmitting, receiving and switching equipment located on City property shall be housed within a structure or cabinet. It shall be architecturally designed to blend in with the surrounding environment, and shall be screened from view by landscaping consistent with (insert applicable screening section here). (iv) Towers located within 1000’ feet of the FiberNet Monticello Co-Location Building shall be required to locate all transmitting, receiving and switching equipment within the FiberNet Monticello Co-Location Building. CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas Subsection (C) General Requirements City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 251 (i) The tower shall have an exterior galvanized finish of lighter blue, gray or other color which minimizes visibility off-site, unless otherwise required by FAA regulations. (j) Lights and Attachments (i) No tower or antenna shall have lights, reflectors, flashers, daytime strobe lights, night-time red lights, or other illuminating devices affixed or attached, unless required by the FAA or FCC. (ii) Towers shall not be illuminated by artificial means. (iii) No tower shall have constructed thereon, or attached thereto, in any way, any platform, catwalk, crow’s nest, or like structure, except during periods of construction or repair. (iv) When incorporated into the approved design of the tower, light fixtures used to illuminate ball fields, parking lots, or similar areas may be attached to the tower. (k) Any tower, antenna and related equipment shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations. (5) Site Landscaping (a) Existing vegetation on the site shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible. (b) Gravel or other durable surface, or other weed prevention measures, shall be applied within the fenced area surrounding the tower and anchors to prevent the growth of weeds, if required by the City Council. (6) Non-Interference (a) No provider shall interfere with the operation of radios, televisions, telephones, facsimile machines, computer modems, telephone answering machines, and other electronic devices. Any such interference shall be corrected as soon as possible by the provider. (b) No new or existing telecommunications service shall interfere with public safety telecommunications. Before the introduction of new service or changes in existing service, telecommunication providers shall notify the City at least ten (10) calendar days in advance of such changes and allow the City to monitor interference levels during the testing process. All costs incurred by the City to monitor interference levels during the testing process shall be paid to the City by the applicant. CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas Subsection (D) Specific Antenna Provisions Page 252 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (7) Agreements (a) All communication towers, antennas, accessory structures, and associated equipment shall be insured against injury or property damage caused by structural failure of the tower or associated equipment. The applicant shall provide proof of such insurance prior to receiving a permit. (b) A signed lease, memorandum of lease, or document requiring the removal of towers and antennas shall be provided to the City. (c) When applicable, written authorization for tower and antenna erection shall be provided by the property owner. (8) Outside Review The Community Development Department is authorized to employ, on behalf of the City, an independent technical expert to review technical materials submitted by the applicant, or to determine if additional information is necessary. The applicant shall pay the cost of such review and/or independent analysis. (D) Specific Antenna Provisions (1) Existing Antenna Changes The adjustment, placement, or replacement of the elements of an antenna array affixed to an approved tower or antenna is permitted provided a building permit is issued and proper licensing is secured. (2) Co-Locations Antenna Co-Locations are a permitted use upon issuance of a building permit for the following locations: (a) Water towers over 250,000 gallon capacity; (b) Co-location on existing telecommunications towers; (c) Sides or roofs of structures over two stories; (d) Church steeples; (e) Existing power or phone pole structures (expansion of pole height shall not exceed 1/10th of the existing pole height); (f) Existing towers supporting amateur radio antennas in the agricultural district. CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas Subsection (G) Specific Personal Wireless Communications Service Antenna Provisions City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 253 (E) Specific Amateur Short Wave Antenna Provisions All amateur short wave antennas shall require authorization through a conditional use permit following the provisions of Section 2.4(D) of this ordinance and shall meet the following additional requirement: (1) Antenna support structures used in the federally licensed amateur radio service shall not exceed a maximum of seventy (70) feet above grade. (F) Specific Radio/Television Broadcast Transmission Antenna Provisions All radio/television broadcast transmission antennas shall require authorization through a conditional use permit following the provisions of Section 2.4(D) of this ordinance and shall meet the following additional requirements: (1) Antenna support structures for radio and television broadcast transmission antennas shall only be located in the I-1 and I-2 zoning districts; (2) Antenna support structures for radio and television broadcast transmission antennas shall not exceed one hundred sixty-five (165) feet in height. (G) Specific Personal Wireless Communications Service Antenna Provisions Antenna support structures for personal wireless communication systems shall be allowed as conditional uses provided: (1) Minimum spacing between personal wireless communications service antenna support structures shall be 1/4 mile. (2) Based upon information provided by the applicant, the City Council may grant exceptions if the City Council determines that any one of the following reasons makes it impractical to locate the planned personal wireless communications service equipment upon an existing antenna support structure within 1/4 mile of the proposed site: (a) No existing building, structure, or antenna support structure meets the structural or height requirements; or (b) No existing building, structure, or antenna support structure meets the frequency reuse and spacing needs of the personal wireless communication syste; or CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas Subsection (I) Submittal Requirements Page 254 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (c) The location of the proposed new antenna support structure is necessary as demonstrated by the applicant, who shall provide to the City Council evidence demonstrating that the planned equipment would cause interference, materially impacting the usability of other existing or planned equipment at the antenna support structure, and the interference cannot be prevented at a reasonable cost. (3) All new antenna support structures for personal wireless communication system antennas shall be a single ground mounted metal, concrete, or plastic composite (i.e., fiberglass, graphite fiber, etc.) pole. Such antenna support structures shall not exceed seventy-five (75) feet in height in Residential and Business zoning districts (see table 3-1), and shall not exceed one hundred sixty-five (165) feet in height in Industrial zoning districts (see table 3-1). (H) Required Permits No person, firm or corporation shall erect, construct in place, re-erect, replace or make structural repairs to any tower without making application for and receiving an approved conditional use permit if applicable and a building permit. In all cases, review by the Community Development Department for all required permits will be necessary. (I) Submittal Requirements Applications for either a building permit or conditional use permit shall include the following: (1) The legal description of the property on which the tower is to be located; (2) A certified survey of the property showing the tower location and related facilities, along with any other information deemed necessary by the Community Development Department; (3) One or more color computer generated photographs depicting the proposed tower located on the site; (4) If a co-locator, information on non-interference; (5) Information on non-interference with public safety telecommunications; (6) Proof of insurance against injury and property damage; (7) Written authorization by the owner of the land for the tower construction; Section 2.4(D): Conditional Use Permits Section 2.4(I): Building Permits CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas Subsection (I) Submittal Requirements City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 255 (8) A recordable agreement, lease or other instrument imposing liability and responsibility upon the owner of the property and the owner of the tower for the removal of the tower upon cessation of use; (9) Documentation that the telecommunications equipment planned for the proposed tower cannot be accommodated on an existing or approved tower or structure within one (1) mile radius; (10) A plan illustrating all known future location sites for telecommunication towers and/or antennas; (11) Information to indicate that construction, installation, and maintenance of the tower will not create a safety hazard or damage to adjacent properties; (12) Copies of all required federal, state and local licenses; (13) A capacity analysis and coverage analysis, as required, prepared by a qualified radio frequency analyst, showing alternate sites considered and the proposed tower site is necessary to meet the needs of the system, and that the tower cannot be located in a less restrictive district, or be accommodated by co-location on an existing tower or structure; (14) A landscape and/or screening plan (if necessary); and (15) A Decommissioning plan outlining the anticipated means and cost of removing the tower and antennas at the end of their serviceable life or upon becoming a discontinued use. The cost estimates shall be made by a competent party; such as a Professional Engineer, a contractor capable of decommissioning or a person with suitable expertise or experience with decommissioning. (16) A security or bond in an amount sufficient to cover complete decommissioning process outlined in the decommissioning plan. (17) Any additional information as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.13 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas Subsection (J) Removal of Abandoned or Unused Towers or Portions of Towers Page 256 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (J) Removal of Abandoned or Unused Towers or Portions of Towers Any tower and/or antenna which is not used for six (6) successive months shall be deemed abandoned and may be required to be removed from the property. All abandoned or unused towers and associated facilities shall be removed within twelve (12) months of the cessation of operations at the site unless a time extension is approved by the City Council. After the facilities are removed, the site shall be restored to its original or an improved state. If a tower is not removed within twelve (12) months after the cessation of operations at a site, the tower and associated facilities may be removed by the City and the costs of removal assessed against the property. The owner of the tower and the owner of the property are both responsible for removal of the tower as required by this section. CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 259 TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types “P” = Permitted “C” = Conditionally Permitted “I” = Interim Permitted Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements A O R A R 1 R 2 T N R 3 M H B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 C C D I B C I 1 I 2 Agricultural Uses Agriculture P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.2(B)(1) Agricultural Sales P 5.2(B)(2) Community Gardens P P P P P P P P P 5.2(B)(3) Stables C 5.2(B)(4) Residential Uses 5.2(C)(1) Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(C)(2)(a) - Duplex P 5.2(C)(2)(b) - Townhouse C P 5.2(C)(2)(c) - Multiple-Family C P C P 5.2(C)(2)(d) Detached Dwelling P P P P P P None Group Residential Facility, Single Family P P P P P 5.2(C)(3) Group Residential Facility, Multi-family P P 5.2(C)(3) Mobile & Manufactured Home / Home Park C C P C C 5.2(C)(4) Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities (public) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P None Active Park Facilities (private) P P P P P P P 5.2(D)(1) Assisted Living Facilities C P C P C 5.2(D)(2) Cemeteries C C C C C C 5.2(D)(3) Clinics C P P P C None Essential Services P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P None Hospitals C P P P C 5.2(D)(4) Nursing/Convalescent Home C C C C C C C C P P P 5.2(D)(5) Passenger Terminal C C C C C None Passive Parks and Open Space P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P None Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C P C C P P P C P P 5.2(D)(6) Schools, K-12 C C C C P C I I 5.2(D)(7) Schools, Higher Education C C None Place of Public Assembly C C C C P C 5.2(D)(8) Utilities (major) C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(D)(9) CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Page 260 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types “P” = Permitted “C” = Conditionally Permitted “I” = Interim Permitted Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements A O R A R 1 R 2 T N R 3 M H B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 C C D I B C I 1 I 2 Office Uses Offices P P P P P P P 5.2(E) Commercial Uses Adult Uses P 5.2(F)(1) Auction House C 5.2(F)(2) Auto Repair – Minor C C C P P 5.2(F)(3) Automotive Wash Facilities P C C 5.2(F)(4) Bed & Breakfasts C C C C C 5.2(F)(5) Boarding House C 5.2(F)(6) Business Support Services P P P P P none Communications/Broadcasting P P P P 5.2(F)(7) Convenience Stores C P P P 5.2(F)(8) Country Club C 5.2(F)(9) Day Care Centers C C P P P C 5.2(F)(10) Entertainment/Recreation, Indoor Commercial P P C C none Entertainment/Recreation, Outdoor Commercial C C C C 5.2(F)(11) Financial Institution P P P 5.2(F)(12) Funeral Homes P P P 5.2(F)(13) Hotels or Motels C P C P 5.2(F)(14) Kennels (commercial) C 5.2(F)(15) Landscaping / Nursery Business P 5.2(F)(16) Personal Services C P P P 5.2(F)(17) Recreational Vehicle Camp Site C 5.2(F)(18) Repair Establishment C P P P P P 5.2(F)(19) Restaurants C P P C 5.2(F)(20) Retail Commercial Uses (other) P P P 5.2(F)(21) Specialty Eating Establishments C P P P none Vehicle Fuel Sales C C C C 5.2(F)(22) Vehicle Sales and Rental C C 5.2(F)(23) Veterinary Facilities (Rural) C 5.2(F)(24) Veterinary Facilities (Neighborhood) C C C C 5.2(F)(24) Wholesale Sales P P P none CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.2 Use-Specific Standards Subsection (A) General Regulations Applicable to All Uses City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 261 TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types “P” = Permitted “C” = Conditionally Permitted “I” = Interim Permitted Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements A O R A R 1 R 2 T N R 3 M H B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 C C D I B C I 1 I 2 Industrial Uses Auto Repair – Major C P P 5.2(G)(1) Bulk Fuel Sales and Storage P P 5.2(G)(2) Extraction of Materials I I I 5.2(G)(3) General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(G)(4) Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(G)(5) Industrial Services C P 5.2(G)(9) Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(G)(6) Light Manufacturing C P P P 5.2(G)(7) Machinery/Truck Repair & Sales P P 5.2(G)(9) Recycling and Salvage Center C C 5.2(G)(10) Self Storage Facilities P C P 5.2(G)(11) Truck or Freight Terminal C P P 5.2(G)(12) Waste Disposal & Incineration C 5.2(G)(13) Wrecker Services C P 5.2(G)(14) 5.2 Use-Specific Standards (A) General Regulations Applicable to All Uses (1) Combination Uses In commercial and industrial base zoning districts, combination uses may be allowed within the principal building with each use subject to all regulations in this ordinance. Table 3-1: Base Zoning Districts CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table of Permitted Accessory Us_s (3) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory Building – minor (5 120 square feet) P P P P P P P P -T p p P P P P P 5.3 D 2 _( 1( ) Accessory Building – major (> 120 square feet) P P P P P P C P P PP P �) Adult Use – accessory I C 5.3(D Agricultural Buildings P 5.3 Q (5) Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) P P P PP P P P 5.3(D)(6) Boarder(s) P P P 5.3(D)f7) Commercial Canopies P P P P P P 5.3 (D) (8) Communication Antennas and Antenna Support Structures P P P P P P P +PP P P P P P P ( ) 5( ) Donation Drop-off Containers P P 5.3 D 10 Drive -Through Services P P P C P P P 5.3 D I I Fences or Walls P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(1 2) Greenhouse/Conservatory (non-commercial) p P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3 D 13 —� )( ). Heliports C C C C C 5.3(D)1=4 Home Occupations P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(15) Indoor Food/Convenience Sales P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(16) Incidental Light Manufacturing P P P P P P P P 5.3_(DXI7) Off-street Loading Space p C p p P P P p p 5.3 D I$ Off-street Parking P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(18) Open Sales P P P P P P C C C 5.3 D 19 Operation and storage of 5.3 Q 20 agricultural vehicles, equipment, P and machinery Outdoor Sidewalk Sales & Display (businesses) p P P P P P P P 5.3 D 21 Outdoor Storage P P P P P P P P P C C C P P 5.3(D)(22) Park Facility Buildings & Structures (public) P p P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(23) Retail Sales of Goods (as part of an office or industrial use) I P P P P P P C C 5.3(D)(24) Page 304 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses TABLE• • ' XSES : ' ' Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Permitted ConditionallyC: I Requirements . R T R M B B FB B C B _,•ATI mml Satellite Dish Antenna P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3 D 25 Shelters (Storm or Fallout) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(26) Sign(s) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3 D 27 Solar Energy System P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3 28 D Swimming Pool P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3 D 29 Large Trash Handling and P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3 D 30 Recycling Collection Area Wind Energy Conversion C C C C C 5.3(D)(3 1 System, Commercial Wind Energy Conversion C C C CC C C C C C C C C C C 5.3(D)(32 System, Non-commercial (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses (1) Accessory Dwelling (a) Accessory dwelling units are permitted only on lots with single-family detached dwellings. (b) No more than one accessory dwelling unit per lot is permitted. (c) Detached accessory dwellings shall be architecturally compatible with the principal dwelling. (d) Occupants of accessory dwelling units are limited to the following: (i) Family members of the person occupying the principal structure. Family members include parents, children, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins of an occupant of the primary structure. (ii) Employee of the occupant of the principal structure whose employment is directed to the principal structure and/or the associated land area of the principal structure. (iii) Employee who provides medical and/or personal care services to an occupant of the primary structure. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 305 CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses Page 310 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance (b) Within the R-1 zoning district, the boarding or renting of rooms shall be limited to one (1) person per dwelling unit. (8) Commercial Canopies (a) Canopies shall not be internally illuminated. (b) Lighting shall be recessed and down directional. (9) Communication Antennas and Antenna Support Structures All communication antenna and antenna support structures shall adhere to the requirements of Section 4.13 in this ordinance. (10) Donation Drop-off Containers (a) No more than one (1) container shall be located on a parcel. (b) Be limited to one sign no more than four (4) feet high and sixteen (16) square feet in area that displays the name and telephone number of the party responsible for the donation container. (c) The container shall not block access to required parking spaces or parking lot aisles. (d) The container shall not be located within fifty (50) feet of a dwelling. (11) Drive-Through Service (a) In general, all drive through service lanes shall adhere to the following: (i) Service provided by the drive through facility is accessory to an interior on-site service within the same building. (ii) Drive-through facilities shall be located at least 200 feet from all residential zoning districts except R-3 and R-4. (iii) Drive-through lanes shall be designed to avoid disruption of pedestrian and vehicular traffic flow, both on- and off-site. (iv) Drive-through lanes shall not be located between the restaurant entrance and customer parking spaces whenever possible. (v) Landscaping and other site improvements are included which screen automobile stacking space from the public street. (vi) Voice amplifiers used in conjunction with drive-thru services shall not be audible to adjoining residential areas. Section 4.13: Telecommunication Towers & Antennas ORDINANCE NO. 530 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN INTERIM ORDINANCE TEMPORARILY PROHIBITING THE SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS FOR, OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF, TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS & ANTENNAS AS PRINCIPAL AND ACCESSORY USE IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City of Monticello will adopt this ordinance to allow the City of Monticello time to study and adopt appropriate land use controls regulating telecommunications towers and antennas in all zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has authorized the analysis of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 13 - Telecommunications Towers and Antennas, Chapter 5, Section 1- Use Table, Chapter 5, Section 2 — Use Specific Standards and Chapter 5, Section 3 - Accessory Uses; and WHEREAS, the City Council has called for a Public Hearing to be held by the Monticello Planning Commission on June 7, 2011 as related to Chapter 4, Section 13 and Chapter 5, Sections 1-3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462.355, et seq., the City hereby adopts and approves the order for interim ordinance temporarily prohibiting submission of applications for, or the construction of, or approval of, telecommunication towers and antennas as an accessory use in all zoning districts within the City of Monticello 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. It shall remain in effect until the adoption of the official controls contemplated herein or for one year, whichever first occurs. 3. This ordinance shall not apply to properties which have filed a valid application for a conditional use permit or have been issued a valid conditional use permit for telecommunication towers and antennas prior to adoption of this ordinance by the City Council. 4. Pending the adoption of appropriate official controls, no application for telecommunications towers and antennas as a principal or accessory use in industrial and commercial districts within the City of Monticello shall be accepted, processed, or approved. ORDiNANCE NO. 530 ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 9th day of June, 2011. CITY OF MONTICELLO Clint Herbst, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: Planning Commission: 06/07/11 1 7. Public Hearing – Consideration of an Amendment to the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan for the Adoption of the 2011 Monticello Parks & Pathway Systems Plan. (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission is asked to review the 2011 Park and Pathway Systems Plan for recommendation, as well as companion amendments to Chapter 5 of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. The updating of the Park and Pathway Systems Plan is tied directly to accomplishing the goals of the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan cited “An unequaled system of parks, trails and recreation facilities including the unique assets of the Monticello Community Center, the Mississippi River and continued focus on the potential conversion of YMCA Camp Manitou into a regional park” as a key factor in achieving the community’s vision for move-up housing and employment. An updated park plan facilitates that focus and acts as a guiding document alongside other planning tools such as the Transportation Plan, the Natural Resource Inventory & Assessment, and the revised Zoning Ordinance. While Monticello has a strong existing park and pathway system and continues to physically expand that system, the community currently lacks a coordinated vision connecting current and future park resources and actively promoting their use. Monticello last updated its Park & Trails Plan in 1996. Since that time, the community has grown by over 50%. Throughout this growth, the community has added to its existing inventory of parks and trails by acquiring new open space and paths through park dedication and easement requirements, but has not put these pieces together within the context of a larger, long-term framework. In addition to past growth, the City of Monticello and Monticello Township have agreed to an Orderly Annexation process allowing the City to plan for future growth within a 10,000 acre boundary. Additionally, the City of Monticello and Wright County have partnered to develop a 1,200 acre regional park at the Bertram Chain of Lakes, just outside the current city limits. With these factors in place, Monticello has a tremendous opportunity to foster community access to a first-class park and trail system through the adoption of an updated plan. The draft Park & Pathway Systems Plan document presented is the result of the work and planning completed over the last eight months. The plan encompasses a coordinated park and pathway system which: Builds on existing assets Incorporates needed infrastructure Provides recommendations for future development Integrates area-wide facilities and resources Planning Commission: 06/07/11 2 Details opportunities to provide residents with more/better information on park and trail facilities The Planning Commission will note that the draft plan is a guide document and implementation tool. It does not provide a detailed capital improvement plan for each of the system parks and trails. Instead, the plan provides an overall vision with accompanying policy statements. The plan then details specific objective that supports the stated vision. The plan gives entities such as the Parks Commission the ability to formulate detailed park planning in response to change and needs. To develop a plan that truly served the community’s long-range interests, input from a variety of stakeholders was critical to the process and has been a founding component of the plan’s development. The depth of the plan also required consultation with citizen-led advisory groups such as the Parks Commission and the MCC Advisory Board. The intent to provide regional connectivity further required direct involvement from the Monticello Public School District and the Wright County Parks Department. Finally, and most importantly, the project involved the input and feedback of the community at-large, including various park user-groups and local recreational associations. Public involvement has been integrated through the following means: On-line user survey Phone and/or email interviews with local athletic association leaders Regular meetings with Parks Commission Meetings with the Monticello Community Center Board Discussions with School District personnel Meeting with Bertram Lakes park design group Coordination with the Wright County Parks Department (the Department is currently completing an update of their County-wide trail plan) Meeting with the Embracing Downtown consultants Public workshop To further supplement existing park system information, planning consultant NAC relied on the following resources and references: The Comprehensive Plan The Natural Resource Inventory & Assessment Wright County parks staff and Wright County’s trail planning consultants U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pelican Lake Restoration Project documents Minnesota DNR resources A variety of resources on opportunities and trends in park planning, both statewide and nationally. The public input and reference documents noted above have created a firm foundation for the draft provided. Planning Commission: 06/07/11 3 The Parks Commission has reviewed the Park & Pathway Systems Plan for recommendation and has requested additional changes as related to parks names and corrections to the detailed park inventory information. They delayed a formal recommendation to June 22nd, in anticipation of a revised plan which addresses those comments. The plan included for the Planning Commission’s consideration includes those revisions requested by the Parks Commission. Pending Planning Commission’s recommendation, the final Park & Pathway Systems Plan will be considered by the City Council for incorporation by reference as an Appendix to the Comprehensive Plan, similar to the Transportation Plan. Both the adoption of the Plan document and the text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan require a super majority vote of approval by the City Council. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt resolution 2011-44, recommending approval of the 2011 Monticello Park and Pathway Systems Plan and related amendments to Chapter 5 of the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. Motion to adopt resolution 2011-44, recommending approval of the 2011 Monticello Park and Pathway Systems Plan and related amendments to Chapter 5 of the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan, subject to recommendations to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to deny adoption of resolution 2011-44, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the 2011 Park and Pathway Systems Plan. The plan provides a needed guide to the future development of the City’s park and pathway system. The Park & Pathway Plan represents completion of a clear policy direction for Monticello’s park planning efforts in both the short and long term. The plan will allow Monticello to better utilize existing resources and more effectively plan for future needs. The plan provides a balance between broad policy statements and specific objectives designed to assist in accomplishing the goals of the plan. The plan also offers the City flexibility in how best to achieve the goals of the plan. As park service areas and needs change, the City will be able to adapt the plan to better serve users, while maintaining the overall system vision. Planning Commission: 06/07/11 4 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2011-44 B. Park & Pathway Systems Plan – Draft 6/3/11 C. Monticello Comprehensive Plan Chapter 1 – Vision Statement D. Monticello Comprehensive Plan Chapter 5 – Parks E. Amendments to Comprehensive Plan Chapter 5 – Parks CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011 – 44 Date: June 7th, 2011 Resolution No. 2011-44 Motion By __________________ Seconded By _______________________ A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE PARKS AND PATHWAYS SYSTEM PLAN AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OF SAID AMENDMENT. WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has, in 2008, adopted a Comprehensive Plan guiding the growth, development, land use, and infrastructure planning for the City; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has provided for the ability of the City to plan for parks, pathways, and open spaces, and specifically makes provision for the protection of open spaces and natural environment; and WHEREAS, said Comprehensive Plan provides for the development of parks and pathways as a part of such guidance; and WHEREAS, the City has received funds from LiveWright, a program of Wright County for the purpose of developing a more comprehensive parks planning document that will increase access to healthy lifestyles; and WHEREAS, the City last undertook a specific planning effort for its parks system in 1996; and WHEREAS, fundamental changes to the size, demographics, and land uses in the City have occurred since the previous parks system plan; and WHEREAS, the City has recently undertaken an extensive study of the natural resources in the community and in its orderly annexation growth area surrounding the current City boundaries; and WHEREAS, the City has conducted an inventory of its existing parks system along with a survey of community residents regarding the City’s operation and development of its parks system; and WHEREAS, the City has found that more detailed plan for its parks and pathways would be consistent with both City objectives and the purposes of the LiveWright program; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following additional Findings of Fact in relation to the need for adoption of an updated parks and pathways system plan: A. Parks and Pathways are a fundamental component of the City’s services and infrastructure, and require planning and management to ensure effective levels of service and efficient service delivery. B. Parks and Pathways are, as observed in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, an integral amenity necessary to support the high quality growth and development envisioned by the City. C. A comprehensive organization plan for this aspect of the City’s infrastructure is critical to help ensure that the City is meeting resident, worker, and visitor needs without duplicating costs. D. The adoption of a plan for parks and pathways helps the City coordinate its recreation objectives with other recreation providers, such as schools, sports associations, and others, to achieve the objectives laid out in the plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.355, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello recommends that the Monticello City Council adopt the amendment to Chapter 5 of the Comprehensive Plan, including the following: 1. The document entitled “Parks and Pathways System Plan”, dated June 3, 2011, along with recommendation specified, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A”. 2. The document entitled “Chapter 5, Parks” as replacement text for the existing Comprehensive Plan Chapter 5, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”. ADOPTED this ___ day of ____, 2011, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. CITY OF MONTICELLO By: _______________________________ Rodney Dragsten, Chair ATTEST: __________________________________________ Angela Schumann, Community Development Director EXHIBIT “A” Attach Final Park & Pathway Systems Plan EXHIBIT “B” Attach Final Comprehensive Plan Amendment Text NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Angela Schumann FROM: Stephen Grittman DATE: June 3, 2011 RE: Monticello — Parks and Pathways System Plan NAC FILE: 191.06 This memorandum forwards a draft of the proposed Parks and Pathways System Plan for the City of Monticello. This Plan would constitute an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan, supplementing and essentially replacing the material in Chapter 5 of the 2008 Plan. We would envision that this document, once formally adopted in final form, would stand as a component of the Comprehensive Plan along with the Transportation Plan and other documents adopted as appendices to the original 2008 document. The Plan was initiated by the City upon receiving a grant from LiveWright, a program of Wright County's Public Health Department. LiveWright has had the opportunity to distribute grant funds from the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) for the purpose of creating an environment that promotes and improves access to healthy lifestyles. The objective of the preparation of this Plan would be consistent with LiveWright goals by conceiving a Parks and Pathways system that will build on existing recreation opportunities in the community, and promote the use of that system throughout the Monticello area. The Parks and Pathways Plan is organized as follows: 1. Introduction, lays out the history, background, and planning framework of the City's parks and pathways system. 2. Existing Parks and Recreation System, identifies and inventories the existing park improvements, establishes an organizational structure for analyzing the system, identifies specific issues, and reports on other efforts to gather information about the City's parks system. 3. Park System Objectives, sets up a series of objectives, and policy concepts that the City will use to create its updated Plan, and to evaluate alternative concepts as opportunities change over time. 4. Parks and Pathways System Plan, integrates information from the inventory (the "where we are") and the objectives (the "where we want to go"), and establishes a physical planning concept which is the graphic illustration of how the City proposes to accomplish the objectives. 5. Implementation, sets up a series of options and more specific steps that the City may consider to effect the Plan and its objectives. The implementation chapter is both specific and general, in that the City may choose to direct resources to certain tools more than others. As time goes by, various implementation options present themselves more prominently while others recede. The follow-up for any planning effort is the development of a strategic plan which would examine current City resources, both financial and staff, and create a program for pursuing development of the Plan goals. Since the inception of this project, As a draft, this document is ready for review by the public at a public hearing, but still has some areas requiring technical completion or adjustment. These items, along with any specific direction arising from comments at the hearing, would be incorporated into a final document for presentation to, and consideration by, the City Council at a subsequent date. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011— 44 Date: June 7th, 2011 Resolution No. 2011-44 Motion By Seconded By A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE PARKS AND PATHWAYS SYSTEM PLAN AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OF SAID AMENDMENT. WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has, in 2008, adopted a Comprehensive Plan guiding the growth, development, land use, and infrastructure planning for the City; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has provided for the ability of the City to plan for parks, pathways, and open spaces, and specifically makes provision for the protection of open spaces and natural environment; and WHEREAS, said Comprehensive Plan provides for the development of parks and pathways as a part of such guidance; and WHEREAS, the City has received funds from LiveWright, a program of Wright County for the purpose of developing a more comprehensive parks planning document that will increase access to healthy lifestyles; and WHEREAS, the City last undertook a specific planning effort for its parks system in 1996; and WHEREAS, fundamental changes to the size, demographics, and land uses in the City have occurred since the previous parks system plan; and WHEREAS, the City has recently undertaken an extensive study of the natural resources in the community and in its orderly annexation growth area surrounding the current City boundaries; and WHEREAS, the City has conducted an inventory of its existing parks system along with a survey of community residents regarding the City's operation and development of its parks system; and WHEREAS, the City has found that more detailed plan for its parks and pathways would be consistent with both City objectives and the purposes of the LiveWright program; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following additional Findings of Fact in relation to the need for adoption of an updated parks and pathways system plan: A. Parks and Pathways are a fundamental component of the City's services and infrastructure, and require planning and management to ensure effective levels of service and efficient service delivery. B. Parks and Pathways are, as observed in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, an integral amenity necessary to support the high quality growth and development envisioned by the City. C. A comprehensive organization plan for this aspect of the City's infrastructure is critical to help ensure that the City is meeting resident, worker, and visitor needs without duplicating costs. D. The adoption of a plan for parks and pathways helps the City coordinate its recreation objectives with other recreation providers, such as schools, sports associations, and others, to achieve the objectives laid out in the plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.355, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello recommends that the Monticello City Council adopt the amendment to Chapter 5 of the Comprehensive Plan, including the following: 1. The document entitled "Parks and Pathways System Plan", dated June 3, 2011, along with recommendation specified, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A". 2. The document entitled "Chapter 5, Parks" as replacement text for the existing Comprehensive Plan Chapter 5, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit `B". ADOPTED this _ day of , 2011, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. CITY OF MONTICELLO Rodney Dragsten, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director EXHIBIT "A" Attach Final Park & Pathway Systems Plan EXHIBIT "B" Attach Final Comprehensive Plan Amendment Text ,Y�y - .. Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan L y (o) � � TiV\1 (: o) �a t � c (0) '9YO17'M J�r 1�21a Julne 39 2M I Public Ecaring Draft Project funded by a Qrantfrom Live Wright, a program of Wright County Public Health MINNFsO,rA S ISION SHIP 5itratc't6'4I{' f1wjI`h I1f3ptbd Cl✓lc7ll Pt1ogTrllllIF I VA Ba•ttcv State of `lleahl, Prepared by: Northwest Ass oclated Consu tants, Inca Table of Contents Page No. Chapter 1. Introduction 1-1 History 1-1 Recent Planning Efforts 1-2 Current Planning Process 1-3 Chapter 2, Existing Parks and Recreation Systems 2-1 Background 2-1 Inventory and Classification 2-1 Existing Parks and Pathways Map 2-2 Regional Parks and Recreation Facilities 2-3 Regional Park Facilities Location Map, Figure 2-1 2-3 Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, Figure 2-2 2-4 Montissippi County Park, Figure 2-3 2-6 Monticello Community Center, Figure 2-4 2-7 Summary of Regional Parks Issues 2-8 Community Parks 2-9 Community Parks Facilities Location Map, Figure 2-5 2-10 East Bridge and West Bridge Parks, Figures 2-6, 2-7 2-11 Ellison Park, Figure 2-8 2-13 Swan Park, Figure 2-9 2-14 River Mill Park, Figure 2-10 2-15 Freeway Fields, Figure 2-11 2-16 Pioneer (Lion's) Park, Figure 2-12 2-17 Groveland Park, Figure 2-13 2-18 Otter Creek Park, Figure 2-14 2-19 City/Xcel Athletic Fields, Figure 2-15 2-20 Summary of Community Parks Issues 2-21 Neighborhood Parks 2-22 Neighborhood Parks Inventory, Figure 2-16 2-22 Existing Park coverage Areas Map 2-25 Pathways 2-26 Summary of Pathway Issues 2-27 Special Use Facilities 2-28 Special Use Facilities Map 2-29 Park Survey and Public Process 2-30 Chapter 3, Parks System Objectives 3-1 Parks and Pathways Role in Community Development 3-1 Changing Park Proximity 3-1 Seven Principles for Parks Development 3-2 Vision and Policy 3-3 Park Development and Design Policies 3-5 Park Acquisition Model, Figure 3-1 3-5 Community Park Model, Figure 3-2 3-6 Neighborhood Park Model, Figure 3-3 3-7 Pathways 3-8 3-8 Sidewalks and Minor Pathways 4-8 Sidewalk/Minor Pathway Cross Section, Figure 3-4 3-9 Secondary Pathways 3-9 Secondary Pathways Cross Section, Figure 3-5 3-10 Primary Pathways 3-10 3-11 Primary Pathways Cross Section, Figure 3-6 4-13 Chapter 4, Parks and Pathways System Plan 4-1 Future Park System Service Area Map 4-3 Park and Trail Draft System Plan Map 4-5 Specific Park Recommendations 4-6 Hamlin Marsh Community Park Search Area 4-6 Hamlin Marsh Community Park Map 4-7 Pelican Lake Community Park Search Area 4-8 Pelican lake Community Park Map 4-9 Edmonson Greenway Community Park Search Area 4-10 Edmonson Greenway Community Park Map 4-11 Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park 4-12 Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Concept Map 4-13 Chapter 5, Implementation Options 5-1 Implementation Strategies 5-1 Funding Mechanisms 5-2 Park Dedication 5-3 Chapter 1 - Introduction Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 1-1 Introduction History. The City of Monticello maintains an extensive system of Parks and Pathways, with much of the system’s development paralleling the growth of the community. The City’s location on the Mississippi River resulted in the early development of riverfront park locations, including Ellison Park, East Bridge and West Bridge Park, and the County’s development of Montissippi Park at the west end of the community. As the City grew, focus on park facilities shifted away from the river, and a series of smaller neighborhood park facilities were added as new neighborhoods developed. Responding to a growing interest in pedestrian and bikeway development, the City undertook a major pathway project, establishing the pathway along the full length of Broadway/County 75 from the Meadow Oaks area on the east end of the community, to the west edge, past Otter Creek. Through the core of the downtown area, the route follows the existing sidewalk for several blocks. This pathway has been enormously popular, even though it is primarily a single spine at the current time. More pathway development followed as new transportation routes sprang up, with the goal of providing off-road pedestrian and bicycle options along those routes, especially in the areas of the schools. Augmenting the downtown recreation options, the City partnered with the Army National Guard to establish the Monticello Community Center in 1990, introducing both indoor and outdoor recreation opportunities which were locally unavailable to the community members, including an indoor pool and water park, climbing wall, gymnasium, track, and fitness training facility, among other elements. The City and the School District later cooperated in the development of an indoor ice facility attached to the Monticello Middle School. Chapter 1 - Introduction Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 1-2 In the middle 2000s, park development focus shifted again, as the YMCA organization announced an interest in selling its Camp Manitou facility to the west of Monticello. Operated as a private facility, the 1,200 acres includes a series of lakes, wetlands, and native woodlands that are unique to the region. The City, together with Wright County, embarked on an effort to acquire this acreage, a venture that is still in process. The addition of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park to the local park and open space inventory, and the costs involved in this project, have necessarily changed the way the City will need to plan for park development in the coming years. Many of these projects were anticipated by a Parks System Plan that was adopted in the mid 1990s. However, significant growth and shifting priorities have made that Plan long since obsolete. Over the past few years, the City has experienced, along with the rest of the country, a significant slow-down in economic development activity. That downturn left a number of expected development projects idle or abandoned, and left several park locations undeveloped. Recent Planning Efforts. During the period of slower growth, however, Monticello has adopted a new Comprehensive Plan, and is currently undertaking an extensive study of its downtown. These projects have positioned the City for the expected rebound in the general economy, and this Parks and Pathways System Plan is a part of the City’s infrastructure planning necessary to ready Monticello for a new era of growth pressure. The City’s Comprehensive Plan cites the community’s system of parks and open spaces as a major factor in the continuing effort to attract and retain new residents. The Comprehensive Plan identifies several components in this system, including the Monticello Community Center, the Mississippi River, and the efforts to acquire and develop the Bertram Chain of Lakes land from the YMCA as key to the quality of the parks system. The Parks planning component of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan addresses the Parks System is a general way, building on the Plan’s long-range growth projections and the existing parks and open space system. Chapter 1 - Introduction Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 1-3 The bulk of the Comprehensive Plan discussion focuses on the existing parks, noting that additional park development will be addressed as the community grows. The new planning effort is designed to build on the Comprehensive Plan’s general discussion, add specificity, and provide guidance on process, clarify park system objectives, and create a series of implementation tools that are tailored to parks and pathways system development. Current Planning Process. This Parks Plan has been supported with funds from LiveWright, a program of Wright County’s Public Health Department. LiveWright has allocated funds from the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP), with the intention of pursuing and promoting healthier lifestyles. In this case, park and pathway planning is being undertaken to improve residents’ access to physical activity, and thus, overall community health. The approach of the Parks and Pathways Plan is to utilize the City’s long-term planning, coupled with the extensive existing inventory of parks and recreation facilities, to create a system that is accessible, efficient, and provides a full range of recreation opportunities, accounting for variations in age, interests, and activity levels. At the same time, a major component of this project is to build in flexibility to the City’s Parks and Pathways infrastructure, allowing the community to adapt its facilities to changing needs over time. It is envisioned that this document will be incorporated as a separate chapter supplementing the existing Parks chapter of the official Monticello Comprehensive Plan. The collection of baseline data for this plan has involved several parallel efforts. Fieldwork has included individual visits to each of the City’s existing park and recreation facility locations, and direct use of much of the community’s pathway and sidewalk inventory. City staff, from Administration and Engineering to Public Works and Community Center representatives, have all provided important direction, review, and guidance. Invaluable input and background has been provided especially by Community Development and Parks Department staff members. Citizen input was received through a detailed survey of park use and assessment, as well as public meetings including workshops and open houses. A summary of the survey results is reported in Chapter 2 of this document, and the survey itself is included as an appendix. Significant contributions have also been made through more formal means, including members and representatives of the following groups, individuals, and organizations: Monticello Parks Commission Monticello Community Center Advisory Board Monticello Planning Commission Monticello School District Monticello Community Education Volunteer Athletic and Sports Associations Chapter 1 - Introduction Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 1-4 The Parks and Pathways Plan relies on the existing system as the starting point for park planning, then establishes a set of objectives and policies to guide future system growth. These objectives are intended to create a framework of the system that the City is planning and building. As a part of this exercise, analysis of the existing system is provided that guides the design of the future parks network. Out of the objectives and policies, the Parks and Pathways System Plan is built both to resolve issues identified in the existing system, and take advantage of the opportunities provided by the natural resources in the area. The System Plan is essentially a graphic representation of the Objectives, overlain on the existing parks and pathways infrastructure. Finally, the plan sets out an Implementation chapter which provides a strategic set of steps for the City to use in realizing the plan objectives over the long term. As this Plan is a document with a planning horizon of 20 years or more, this chapter includes detailed, practical steps for city officials to use as development decisions are made, as well as alternative strategies that may be considered as options arise over time. Like any plan, this document relies on a snapshot of the existing community as its starting point, following a presumed set of growth assumptions for future system development. Therefore, regular review and updating is important to ensure that the Parks and Pathways System Plan remains fresh and relevant to Monticello’s growth and development decision- making. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-1 Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Background. As noted in the previous section, the starting point for developing the plan is the existing network of facilities. In the material below, the existing parks and pathways are inventoried and described. Along with the inventory, a summary of issues is included that identifies potential gaps or changes that may be addressed by plans and policies that follow. Following the facilities inventory, the second half of this chapter consists of an analysis of existing park locations and the “coverage” of park proximity to the City’s neighborhoods. This section helps suggest any future park locations for both existing and future residents. Finally, the chapter concludes with a description of the process employed during this project to gather public input. One of the major efforts made was an online survey, for which a summary of responses and major themes is discussed. When taken together with the inventory, the public input helps create a complete picture of the existing parks and pathways, and how the system is used and perceived by the community. In summary, the analysis shows extensive coverage of the community under the existing parks network, and high degree of satisfaction with the existing parks. Along with these positive aspects, there are few primary issues. These are: A general lack of connectivity between various park locations, or between existing neighborhoods and desired destinations in or near the City; Underutilization of the Mississippi River and other water resources; Conflicts with schedule an inadequate number of active sports and athletic fields; and Lack of continuity on the pathway system, limiting pathway use and choice. Inventory and Classification. The Monticello Parks and Pathways System consists of five layers of facility types. These types are described below, with a mapped inventory of each existing park in this class. The mapped inventory of the higher classification facilities is superimposed on an aerial photograph of the park, and each entry includes a written inventory of park elements, where practical. The five classes are: (1) Regional Parks; (2) Community Parks; (3) Neighborhood Parks; (4) Pathways; and (5) Special Use Facilities. With the list of facilities in each class, a summary of issues is included. A map of the entire existing system is provided on the following page. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-3 Regional Parks and Recreation Facilities The largest parks fall into a classification labeled in this Plan as Regional Parks and Recreation Facilities. These parks are those that attract users from a wide area beyond Monticello’s boundaries. Regional facilities commonly are larger in size, and/or have specific elements not found in more localized parks. Regional Parks in Monticello include the developing Bertram Lakes Regional Park (a joint venture between the City of Monticello and Wright County), and Montissippi Park (a Wright County Park). The Monticello Community Center also serves, in many ways, as a regional park facility, in both its scope of service area and its unique recreation elements. The Community Center is included in this section due to its role in the City’s recreation system. A map showing locations of the Regional Park Facilities in Monticello is displayed below. Regional Park Facilities Location Map Figure 2-1 Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-4 Regional Parks are often operated by higher levels of government, such as counties, metropolitan-wide organizations, or park districts. Montissippi Park is an example of this operational model. However, Bertram Chain of Lakes is a unique regional facility in that Monticello and Wright County will share in the operation of the park, with each jurisdiction operating a specific set of park elements. Although a locally developed facility, the Monticello Community Center (MCC) also extends its reach as a regional recreation facility, due primarily to the fact that such facilities are relatively rare in the region. As such, the MCC attracts regular users from many areas of northern Wright County and southern Sherburne County. In addition to these regional facilities, Lake Maria State Park is located six miles west of Monticello. This park is a 1,580 acre property just north of County Highway 39, almost all of which is preserved as natural open space. The primary access to this park is marked from I-94 through the community. Monticello would also be the primary provider of commercial services to those visiting this State of Minnesota facility. Information regarding Lake Maria can be found at www.dnr.state.mn.us/state_parks/lake_maria/index.html. Bertram Chain of Lakes. Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Source: WSB 2008 Aerial Photograph Figure 2-2 Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-5 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities Bertram Regional Park 90th Street NE 1,200 acres (370 ac- city/county owned) Canoe Launch Hiking Paths Natural Area Parking Scenic View Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park is a developing facility of what will eventually be approximately 1,200 acres of natural woodlands, wetlands, and prairie, combined with a series of improved active park spaces. The property also includes nearly 100 acres of farmland. Bertram is being acquired and developed jointly by the City of Monticello and Wright County from the Greater Minneapolis YMCA, which has used much of the area as a day camp for more than 50 years. The property is currently outside of the boundaries of the City in Monticello Township, although most of the park area lies within the City’s Orderly Annexation Area. The park area includes a chain of four lakes, including Bertram, Long, Mud, and First Lakes, which also serve as the source of Otter Creek, flowing to the Mississippi River through developed portions of the City. Plans for the Regional Park are evolving, but are expected to include a full range of active and passive elements. A system of pathways will connect all sections of the park property, and the most active elements are expected to be located toward the north, centering on the site of the day camp areas. These areas include a swimming beach at the north end of Bertram Lake, and a number of other informal camp structures. The City is also considering inclusion of a field-sports complex on the land which is currently been farmed. More detail regarding the long-range development of the park is provided in the System Plan section of this document, Chapter 4. To date, the City and County have acquired about one-third of the total acreage, and are in the process of working through the park design options for the property as a whole. As a part of the city’s parks system survey, Bertram Lakes received broad support from respondents, and was the single most commonly visited park location in terms of the number of different visitors. Also of note, many respondents identified Bertram as a potential location for proposed improvements and new elements to be added to the park system, indicating that Bertram’s more remote location was not seen as a negative factor in the location of new facilities. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-6 Montissippi County Park. Montissippi County Park Source: WSB 2008 Aerial Photograph Figure 2-3 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities Montissippi County Park 170 acres Picnic Facilities Rest Room Facilities Playground Equipment Fishing Pier Paved Hiking Paths Boat Launch Pathway Connection Montissippi County Park is a 170 acre county park facility wholly within the boundaries of the City of Monticello. The Park has several hundred feet of frontage on the Mississippi River, including a boat launch and picnic grounds, and provides a wide variety of passive recreational activities, including two miles of hiking and skiing trails. Montissippi is a heavily used park by Monticello residents, based on comments in the parks survey. Resident responses indicated a number of desired improvements and additions to the park, which have been forwarded to County parks staff. For the City, the primary comments related to access to this park, including better pedestrian and bike access from the “Broadway” Pathway which runs along the south side of County Highway 75. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-7 Monticello Community Center. Monticello Community Center Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph Figure 2-4 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities Monticello Community Center 505 Walnut Street 4 acres Friendship Island Community Garden Leagues Indoor Play Area Indoor Ice Arena Drop In Childcare Basketball Court Climbing Wall Community Room Concessions Fitness Center Indoor Pool & Waterslide Parking Restrooms Volleyball Court Walking Track A major provider of recreation facilities in the City, the Monticello Community Center is situated on approximately four acres of property in downtown Monticello. The building includes an indoor pool and water park, fitness equipment, climbing wall, a gymnasium and indoor walking track. Other community uses also occupy in the building, including the Army National Guard, Senior Center, community and meeting rooms, and the Monticello City Hall offices and Council Chambers. The Community Center received significant support and attention from the parks system survey respondents. The MCC comments were indicative of much of the survey with a Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-8 large focus on water-oriented recreation, including a solid majority who encouraged expansion of pool and water-park style facilities, whether indoor or outdoor. Another aspect of this showed us a support for a “splash pad” facility. Respondents to the survey who don’t use the MCC facilities cited crowded conditions (including pool, gym, walking track, and fitness areas) as one of the primary factors, supporting the idea that some expansion would increase facility use. Summary of Regional Parks Issues As noted above, whereas Regional Parks are often provided or operated by higher governmental units, Monticello has a large number of such facilities, including two (the MCC and Bertram Lakes) that are under full or partial local management. For the MCC itself, the issues relate primarily to limited space to respond to requests for expansion or additional elements. A number of survey respondents indicated concerns related to the popularity of the provided activities . They noted conflicts with crowded conditions, particularly during times of peak use, as reasons for not utilizing the facility. Also at issue for the MCC will be how it will continue to fit into the fabric of a changing downtown Monticello. At the time of its development, the MCC was seen as an anchor to planning for a revitalized, but more traditional, downtown environment. While still an anchor, the City’s downtown planning efforts (still in progress at the time of this project) envision a more sweeping redevelopment of the downtown area. As such, pedestrian or bicycle connections to the MCC will likely become a more important planning issue for the community. For Bertram Chain of Lakes, the City has committed a significant portion of its parks budget to the acquisition and development of this facility. Because it is at the edge of the community’s growth boundary, the predominant issue will be how Bertram can absorb most of the park development and still provide effective levels of recreation services to Monticello residents. Part of this will need to be addressed through access, both vehicular and non- vehicular, and part will be an issue for park design – ensuring that Bertram’s role as a provider of both “neighborhood” and “community” park services is built into the layout of the park itself. A related issue for Bertram Lakes will be its role in providing athletic facilities in the community. Often considered to be a function of community parks, Bertram Lakes is programmed, at least preliminarily, to fill this role as well. While this approach raises issues of access and proximity, an advantage that can present itself is that the concentration of athletic fields can help facilitate and attract tournament play, a major source of funding for local athletic associations, and often, an opportunity to leverage economic development benefits from the park system. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-9 Community Parks Whereas regional parks serve a population that typically extends well beyond the boundaries of the City, at the Community Park level, the size and park elements serve a community-wide population, very often because of specific aspects of the park itself. Ballfield complexes are one common example of these parks. Community Parks also are characterized by one-of-a-kind elements and will commonly include parking areas to permit their use by members of the community that do not live near enough to walk or bike. These facilities often serve a dual role in that they will also play the role of neighborhood park to those living or working nearby. In Monticello, nine existing parks have a community-wide role. The first six are the most common examples of Community Parks, and include Ellison, East Bridge, West Bridge, Xcel/City Athletic Fields, Freeway Fields, Groveland Park, and Pioneer (Lions) Park. These parks include community facilities such as ballfields, reservable picnic shelters, and in a few cases, access to the Mississippi River. The line separating a park’s definition as community or neighborhood can be a narrow one, and the role of a particular park may change over time as its facilities change, or as the neighborhood in which it is located changes in demographic makeup, even (for some parks) the season of the year. As such, these definitions should be taken with some measure of flexibility. Three other parks, although smaller than typical for this class, also play a Community Park role due to their unique elements: Swan (Mississippi) Park, with an extensive and popular location for viewing the area’s large Trumpeter Swan population; River Mill Park, primarily due to the popularity of its winter sliding hill; and Otter Creek Park, an intersection of Otter Creek and oak savanna/native prairie which serves as a shaded rest area along the City’s Broadway Street Pathway near its current western terminus. A map of the Community Parks in Monticello is displayed on the next page. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-10 Community Park Facilities Location Map Figure 2-5 Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-11 East Bridge and West Bridge Park East Bridge Park Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph Figure 2-6 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities East Bridge Park 119 River Street E 2.5 acres Pathway Connection Arboretum Community Room Gardens Gazebo Mississippi River View Natural Area Parking Scenic View Sliding Hill East and West Bridge Parks are perhaps the most visible parks in the community, flanking the Trunk Highway 25 bridge that spans the Mississippi River at the north edge of the community’s downtown area. Both parks provide a variety of facilities, but despite their proximity, have significantly different environments. East Bridge is more passive in setting and use, with the exception of its extensive use as a sliding hill during the winter season. Apart from this, the park is used for its views and its gardens. West Bridge Park has a much more active nature, including a playground facility, reservable shelter, and more direct access to the riverbank, including a fishing pier. A underpass connects the two parks under the highway bridge at the river. This pathway provides an Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-12 excellent opportunity for both connection and access, as well as providing views of the Mississippi River and potentially, access to the islands in the river adjacent to East Bridge Park. Both East and West Bridge Parks abut the river, and provide direct access to any river pathway that may develop over time. West Bridge itself provides raft, kayak, and canoe access to the water. Both parks are within one block of the Broadway Pathway, and provide connection to Walnut Street, programmed as the primary downtown retailing street. West Bridge Park Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph Figure 2-7 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities West Bridge Park 107 River Street W 3 acres Basketball Ball Court Canoe Launch Community Room Fishing Pier Ice Skating Mississippi River View Natural Area Shelter Parking Picnic Area Picnic Shelter Picnic Tables Playground Permanent Restrooms Rollerblading Scenic ViewPathway Connection Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-13 Ellison Park . Ellison Park Source: WSB 2008 Aerial Photograph Figure 2-8 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities Ellison Park 811 River Street E 4.2 acres Pathway Connection Barbecues Boat Launch Canoe Launch Community Room Fishing Pier Gazebo Handicapped Play Area Log Shelter Mississippi River View Veteran’s Memorial Natural Area Open Space Parking Picnic Area Picnic Tables Playground Permanent Restrooms Scenic View Shelter Trumpeter Swan Viewing Ellison Park serves as one of the City’s most important community facilities due to its riverfront location and (sometimes barely) enough room to support community-wide events. Ellison Park provides the City’s primary point of contact with the Mississippi River through its boat launch, fishing pier, and visual proximity. It is also a major pathway location terminus from both the west and a sidewalk access from Broadway through the New River Hospital parking lot. Ellison Park is located one block north of the Broadway Pathway. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-14 Swan Park. Swan Park Source: 2008 Beacon Aerial Photography Figure 2-9 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities Mississippi Drive (Swan Park) 121 Mississippi Drive E 0.09 acres Pathway Connection Mississippi River View Natural Area Parking Picnic Area Scenic View Swan Park (originally known as “Mississippi Drive Park” is a specialty facility that meets very few of the common community park criteria, with the noted exception that it serves a large tourism role for visitors viewing the trumpeter swans on the Mississippi River. The park is served by a parking area along Mississippi Drive. Otherwise, this park will continue to maintain limited park facilities beyond those already in place. Adjoining the south bank of the Mississippi River, the park is approximately one quarter mile to County 39 and a major County trail, and an addition 0.3 miles to the City’s Broadway Pathway. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-15 River Mill Park. River Mill Park Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph Figure 2-10 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities River Mill Park 6332 River Mill Drive 7 acres Baseball Field Basketball Court Lighted Sliding Hill Natural Area Picnic Area Playground Restrooms Shelter Pathway Connection Volleyball Court River Mill Park has been classified as a community park for one primary reason – its lighting sliding hill which is the primary such location in the community during the winter season. Apart from winter visits, River Mill functions as a neighborhood park with elements common to most, and access to the neighborhood via River Mill Drive and a pathway extension to Mill Trail. River Mill abuts the Broadway Path on its south border, and as such, has good connectivity to the rest of the City’s parks and pathways existing system. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-16 Freeway Fields. Freeway Fields Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph Figure 2-11 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities Freeway Fields 2331 Meadow Oak Avenue 5.5 acres Multiple Use Fields Parking Picnic Area Portable Restroom Rollerblading Soccer Field Pathway Connection Freeway Fields is an athletic facility consisting of two fields suitable for multiple uses, and one regulation soccer field. Proximity to Meadow Oak Avenue raises some issues for soccer use. The facility has a parking lot of approximately 50 spaces. The site is tightly developed with the existing fields and has no room for further expansion of additional elements at this time. Due to a general shortage of athletic field space in the community, Freeway Fields is heavily used. The Broadway Pathway is directly accessible from this facility at the east end of the park. In addition, the County 18/Fenning Avenue Pathway is accessible to west, approximately 0.3 miles away. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-17 Pioneer (Lions) Park. Pioneer Park (Lion’s Park) Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph Figure 2-12 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities Pioneer Park (Lion’s Park) 5010 Fallon Avenue 16.3 acres Community Room Concessions Kitchen Facilities Natural Area Parking Picnic Area Playground Permanent Restrooms Portable Restrooms Shelter Pathway Connection Volleyball Court Pioneer Park is one of the most heavily visited parks south of the freeway. It is located on parcel with a remnant stand of open mature oak trees, and a large wetland on the south half of the property. The property is also near the Monticello Schools campus (northeast of the park). The School Boulevard Pathway provides access to the property, as does Fallon Avenue. With the planned constructed on an overpass for Fallon Avenue over I-94, Fallon is likely to become a much more heavily travelled roadway, leading to an expectation that Pioneer Park will continue to see an increase in use over time. The City holds its “Movies in the Park” events at Pioneer Park during the summer. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-18 Groveland Park. Groveland Park Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photography Figure 2-13 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities Groveland Park Insert address 5.2 acres Open Multi-use Field Basketball Court Natural Area Picnic Area Playground Portable Restrooms Shelter Volleyball Court Parking Area Groveland Park was developed as a facility primarily to serve the Groveland neighborhood, but due to its location and size, has grown into a role as a Community Park. The site has a number of improvements that appeal to a wider range of users, including a parking area that serves visitors from beyond the neighborhood. One of its primary attractions is its large undefined open field area that can be used for an unlimited number of organized athletics or unstructured play. Groveland Park is approximately 0.4 miles from a pathway along Chelsea Road, and three-quarters of a mile from the pathway along Highway 25. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-19 Otter Creek Park. Otter Creek Park Source: Wright County Beacon 2008 Aerial Photograph Figure 2-14 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities City/Xcel Athletic Fields 1350 Broadway W 0.8 acres+ Gazebo Pathway Connection Creek Side View Natural Area Picnic Area Scenic View Otter Creek Park is a specialty park that has been placed in the community park classification due to its location along the Broadway Path, a heavily travelled pathway that spans much of the breadth of the community from near Montissippi County park on the west to the Meadow Oak neighborhood on the east. Where the pathway crosses Otter Creek, a wayside with a gazebo and picnic area has been provided, and is one of the most picturesque locations on the Broadway Path. The property itself is City parkland and shared use area between the County Highway Department and the Burlington Northern Railway. From the west boundary of Otter Creek, the path winds through a stand of oaks, and then through a prairie restoration area with remnants of pristine tall-grass prairie on the route. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-20 City/Xcel Athletic Fields. City/Xcel Athletic Fields Source: WSB 2008 Aerial Photograph Figure 2-15 Park Name Location Acreage Amenities City/Xcel Athletic Fields 2171 River Street W 14 acres Baseball Fields Softball Fields Bleachers Concessions Parking Picnic Area Permanent Restrooms Shelter Pathway Connection The City/Xcel Athletic Fields are the primary location for softball and youth baseball competition fields in the community, with fenced, lighted fields and other amenities supporting this specific use. The property is provided to the City for this use by Xcel Energy, and as such, is operated, but not owned by Monticello. The City’s permission to use this facility is subject to Xcel’s needs, and as such, can be terminated with limited notice. Because the fields are fenced for competition, they do not lend themselves to multiple use for other field sports such as soccer or lacrosse. The City/Xcel Athletic Fields are about one-third of a mile from the Broadway Pathway along River Street. In addition, a new crossing of the Burlington Northern Railway is being considered that would provide more direct access between this area and Montissippi Park. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-21 Summary of Community Park Issues Overall, community park space in Monticello is underdeveloped due to the small spaces devoted to community park use. The largest in gross area is Pioneer Park, however, much of that property is covered by wetland or other site constraints. The Xcel/City ballfields provides four baseball and softball fields, however, the facility is on land provided by Xcel Energy. While no indication has been given that this use is in jeopardy, there is a potential issue of space availability if this property had to be abandoned as athletic facility space. Freeway Fields is the only other park with more than a single ball field. The Monticello School District owns and manages all of the remaining concentration of athletic field space. In discussions with school district staff and sports association volunteers, there is a shortage of field space, particularly for soccer and baseball. While there are some efficiencies in sharing school district facilities with the City or private groups, the schools, naturally, claim priority on their fields during their season, leaving other groups with difficult scheduling, especially during fall and spring when daylight is short. One of the potential solutions to this issue may present itself with the City’s acquisition of the Bertram Chain of Lakes property, a portion of which includes previously farmed land that would be suitable for athletic field development. The City is exploring this option as a part of the Bertram Lakes Advisory Council work. The Council has established a subcommittee working specifically on the potential for an athletic complex, informed by local school and association groups. At the time of preparation of this Plan, planning work has risen to a conceptual level, however, those considerations have not been finalized. More detail as to the present status of this effort is included in the Plan section of this document (Chapter 4). The tightness of facilities on undersized community park sites has tended to eliminate natural areas as a component of the City’s park inventory. Even in areas adjacent to significant natural resources, such as the riverfront, very little natural space is available for use. Many of the respondents to the City’s parks survey (see later discussion) expressed an interest in more natural open space experiences in the City’s park system. This interest is reflected in a desire for more natural views, more open space and less crowding on park sites, and wildlife viewing. The preservation of natural open space requires a commitment to acquiring adequate property so active recreation does not crowd out the natural space areas. Community parks will often serve this role, in addition to providing more locally-oriented facilities for the immediate neighborhood. So, for community park acquisition and development, it will be important to identify spaces of adequate acreage to meet the needs of park users, and which provide a combination of active recreation and passive open space, including space to provide reasonable buffering between the two. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-22 Neighborhood Parks Neighborhood Parks are those which are located and equipped to serve specific local populations, most commonly neighborhoods within a one-half mile walking distance from the park. This distance is often considered the outside distance that residents will be willing to walk with small children for park visits. Monticello has eighteen parks that serve this neighborhood role exclusively. In addition to these, regional and community parks commonly serve as neighborhood level facilities when they are in close proximity to residential areas. This is definitely the case for most of Monticello’s community park facilities. In the table below, a summary of the City’s Neighborhood Parks is provided, with general location and a list of amenities current at the time of the preparation of this Plan. It is common that amenities will change over time as the Parks Commission and City staff evaluates and updates equipment commensurate with changing neighborhood demographics. Neighborhood Parks Inventory Figure 2-16 Park Name Location Amenities Balboul Park Hedman Lane Natural Area Battle Rapids Park County Rd 39 & Gillard Avenue NE Scenic View Mississippi River Frontage Natural Area Cardinal Hills Park School Boulevard & Martin Drive Picnic Area Cardinal Hills Tot Lot Mockingbird Lane Picnic Area Playground Shelter Country Club Park Fairway Drive Baseball Field Picnic Area Playground Volleyball Court Fallon Park Fallon Avenue & 7th Street E. Natural Area Featherstone Park Ebersole Avenue & 87th Street NE Undeveloped Fourth Street Park 405 Ramsey Street Baseball Field Basketball Court Hockey Ice Skating Parking Picnic Area Playground Restrooms Shelter Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-23 Park Name Location Amenities Hillcrest Park River Street W & Broadway Baseball Field Parking Picnic Area Playground Hunters Crossing Fallon Avenue NE & 85th Street NE Natural Area Meadow Oak Park Meadow Oak Drive Basketball Court Natural Area Picnic Area Playground Waterslide Par West Park Prairie Road & Kevin Longley Drive Basketball Court Disc Golf Natural Area Parking Picnic Area Playground Parkside Park Oakridge Drive Flower Park Gazebo Natural Area Open Space Parking Prairie West Park NA Playground Rolling Woods Park Bakken Street & Deer Street Basketball Court Natural Area Picnic Area Playground Sunset Ponds Park Goodrich Drive & 94th Street NE Natural Area Parking Picnic Area Playground Soccer Field Water Tower City View County Hwy 18 & Fenning Avenue City Overlook Natural Area Parking Picnic Area Scenic View Wildwoods Wildwood Way Natural Area The primary concern for Neighborhood Parks in a System Plan is to ensure that there is adequate coverage, providing reasonable proximity to residential areas. The map below provides a view of the coverage area for neighborhood park locations, including a few of the community parks that provide neighborhood service levels. This map utilizes a one-half mile radius around each park location as a tool to help understand where there might be gaps in access to park facilities. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-24 Very few locations show more than one-half mile distance to an existing park location, and some of those areas have nearby access to school facilities and/or the future Bertram Chain of Lakes parkland. For some parks, coverage area is less than shown due to access barriers such as the freeway and railroad. However, alterations to coverage are not likely to be affected much since in most cases, these areas overlap with coverage from other park sites. Be r t r a m C h a i n o f L a k e s R e g i o n a l P a r k Mo n t i s s i p p i C o u n t y P a r k Li t t l e M o u n t a i n , M o n t i c e ll o , a n d E a s t v i e w S c h o o l s Wa t e r T o w e r P a r k Mo n t i c e l l o M i d d l e S c h o o l Pi o n e e r P a r k ( L i o n s P a r k ) Pi n e w o o d E a s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Ri v e r M i l l P a r k El l i s o n P a r k Su n s e t P o n d s P a r k Fr e e w a y F i e l d s Me a d o w O a k s P a r k Ci t y / X c e l B a l l f i e l d s Pa r W e s t P a r k Hu n t e r ' s C r o s s i n g Gr o v e l a n d P a r k 4t h S t P a r k Fe a t h e r s t o n e Hi l l c r e s t P a r k We s t B r i d g e P a r k Ca r d i n a l H i l l s P a r k Ba l b o u l P a r k Ea s t B r i d g e P a r k Fa l l o n P a r k Co u n t r y C l u b P a r k Ba t t l e C r e e k P a r k Pa r k s i d e P a r k Ro l l i n g W o o d s P a r k Fr o n t S t P a r k Ca r d i n a l H i l l s T o t L o t P a r k Ot t e r C r e e k P a r k Mi s s i s s i p p i D r i v e ( S w a n P a r k ) Si l v e r S p r i n g s G o l f C o u r s e Mo n t i c e l l o C o u n t r y C l u b Ce d a r L a k e Pe l i c a n L a k e No r t h L a k e Lo n g L a k e Be r t r a m L a k e Un n a m e d Mu d L a k e Sl o u g h Fi r s t L a k e St a l o c h P o n d Ho l k e r s S l o u g h Park and Trail Plan Existing Park Coverage Areas Neighborhood Parks (1/2 Mile)Parks Golf Courses School Property City-Owned Property Bike Pathway Sidewalk Lakes CityBoundary Parcels STATE HIGHWAY 25 NE FENNING AVE NE FALLON AVE CHELSEA RD EDMUNSON AVE SCHOOL BLVD 9 0 T H S T S E C H E L S E A R D W RIVER ST 7 T H ST E Co m m u n i t y C e n t e r §¨¦94 COUNTY ROAD 18 State Highway 25 County Road 75 C OUNTY ROAD 39 Sources: City of Monticello, Wright County, WSB, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Map Date: 05/19/2011. Co u n t y R o a d 3 9 N E M ississ i p pi R i v e r SH E R B U R N E C O U N T Y WR I G H T C O U N T Y 04,5009,0002,250 Feet¯ Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-26 Pathways The fourth element of the City’s parks system is its pathways. Pathways fill two roles, both as alternative transportation mode, and more and more, as recreation facilities themselves. The City has developed, over time, an extensive system of pathways and other pedestrian/bicycle routes throughout the community. In the early development of Monticello, sidewalks were commonly constructed along most City streets – this is the typical condition in the original platted areas of the City around the downtown area. Eventually, the requirement for sidewalks ended, and for several years through the 1950s to the 1990s, new neighborhoods were constructed without separate pedestrian or bicycle routes, other than on-street options. In the 1990s, the residents began to raise concerns over the lack of safe pedestrian routes, and the City initiated two efforts – one being a requirement for sidewalks in new residential development, and the second being a program of pathway development. Beginning most prominently with the Broadway Pathway, an off-street pedestrian and bicycle system was begun. The initial projects in this regard follow major street routing, with the general objective being the connection of the City’s major recreation and educational facilities. When built as sidewalks, the most common construction method requires a five or six foot wide path, typically with a concrete surface. Where there is adequate right of way, the sidewalk is built with an area of planted boulevard space between the street and the sidewalk. In most cases, it is considered the property owner’s responsibility to maintain the sidewalk as if it were a private improvement, although it is on public right of way. When constructed as a grade-separated pathway, the most common method requires an eight or ten foot wide path, typically with an asphalt/bituminous surface. As with sidewalks, it is common to separate the path from the road with a planted boulevard when space permits. In some cases, on-road designations for pathways have been given where off- street pathways are not practical. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-27 As the City grew, the decision as to whether a particular pathway should be constructed as local sidewalk or pathway became less clear. As a result, there are a number of areas where pathways are incomplete, or where they change construction style. These inconsistencies can lead to safety concerns as pedestrian traffic is forced onto the street, or as bicycle and pedestrian traffic suddenly are confronted with sharing narrower paths. Maintenance can also be confusing when the status of the pathway changes between wide and narrow, asphalt and concrete. The map at the beginning of this Chapter on page 2-2 shows the existing Parks and Pathways. The Pathways themselves are differentiated graphically between sidewalk and pathway construction. Summary of Pathway Issues As noted above, there is a need to move toward greater continuity in the pathway system, with the goal of resolving differences in construction style, maintenance responsibilities, and to help with individual navigation on the system. A second issue is routing and destinations. The pathway system functions primarily as an alternative transportation system at the current time, following roadways almost exclusively. As a result, the environment for many pathways is compromised as being highly exposed to sun and wind, and often a relatively barren landscape due to the need to meet engineering standards for the adjacent roadways. Finding alternative routing for future pathways would enhance the recreational value of the pathway system, with the objective being that the pathway finds a route to an important destination, doing so with sensitivity to the environment favored by pathway users, rather than automobiles. Finally, the pathway system suffers from a lack of organization, related to the continuity issue raised previously. Improving organization will allow users of the system to navigate more easily, similar to the way in which drivers progress from local street to collector street to arterial roadway as they make their trips. A more organized hierarchy of pathways will resolve a number of functional issues for future pathway development and use. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-28 Special Use Facilities Special Use Facilities are those local recreational facilities that complement the public system, but which are not provided, operated or managed by the City. In most cases, special use facilities are provided for a purpose that is specific to a certain population or interest group, or are privately provided to the general public as a business venture. The Monticello area is home to a number of such facilities that include private golf, bowling, and fitness providers, and the Monticello School District as a public provider of athletic facilities for its own use, but which are often available to the general public when not needed by the school. The following listing summarizes the special use facilities in the Monticello are: Monticello Schools – Monticello High School/Little Mountain Elementary School/ Eastview School campus. This combined campus is home to a concentration of court sports, competition and practice athletic fields, and other outdoor play. Monticello Schools – Monticello Middle School. This facility includes outdoor court and athletic fields, including a lighted stadium used for fall and spring sports. Monticello Schools – Pinewood Elementary School. This facility includes outdoor athletic fields, and until recently, a large playground facility. Replacement of the “Magic Kingdom” playground has been discussed by community groups. Gold’s Gym. This is a private fitness facility providing swimming, racquetball, and fitness equipment. Snap Fitness. This is a private fitness facility providing fitness machines. Monticello Country Club. This is an 18-hole privately owned daily fee golf course that is open to public play, including a driving range. River City Extreme. This is a private entertainment facility that provides bowling and outdoor volleyball leagues. Hawk’s Sports Bar and Grill. This bar/restaurant provides outdoor volleyball leagues. Monticello Sportsmen’s Club. In Monticello Township south of the City, this facility provides target firearms shooting ranges, trap shooting leagues, and an archery range. Monticello Rod & Gun Club. This facility provides firearms shooting ranges and trap shooting leagues. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-30 Park Survey and Public Process As a part of the planning process, the City conducted an online survey for voluntary respondents, asking for impressions of the City’s existing parks system, what kinds of improvements were most of interest, and how the City should prioritize parks and pathway development. From the survey, three dominant themes emerged. (1) Emphasize the growth and extension of pathway planning and development. In a number of questions, pathway development consistently ranked as the single most commonly supported objective, often receiving support from more than three quarters of respondents, and finishing first in the priority listing. (2) Improve access to, and development of, water-oriented facilities. This cluster of response reflected a wide variety of water experiences, both natural and man-made. Included under this umbrella were interest in expanding access and use of the Mississippi River, and the development of water-park or splash-pad types of facilities, among other related responses. (3) Increase access to natural open space experiences. When exploring the types of recreation opportunities most often requested, the respondents identified strong support for access to natural areas. Some of this interest crossed over into other areas, including access to water (Mississippi River and the Bertram Chain of Lakes, etc.), or pathway development preferences. The survey respondents were uniformly complimentary of the Monticello’s park system as it exists, with certain issues raised over the supply of athletic fields, and occasionally, issues raised over the lack of facilities or pathway links. The survey asked a series of questions with regard to the Monticello Community Center. A strong majority of respondents used the MCC regularly. For those that did not, two primary objections were raised. The most prominent one related to crowded conditions and conflicts between the number or amount of facility space – these responses implied that an expansion of space would increase usage of the center. The second area of concern related to the cost of use, either for membership or daily fee usage. Finally, the Bertram Chain of Lakes project received a significant amount of attention from respondents. It was the most commonly visited facility among all parks in the community, even though only a portion of the park is open to public use. When asked to identify and locate their highest priority addition to the park system, Bertram Lakes was a commonly cited location for the added element. This held true for a wide variety of park elements, from water park facilities to athletic fields, to natural spaces. This set of responses indicated a strong support for the City’s efforts to continue acquisition and development of the Bertram project. Chapter 2 - Existing Parks and Recreation Systems Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 2-31 Other input into the planning effort has included a series of discussions with the MCC Board, coordination with the City’s consultants working on the downtown revitalization planning, city staff members, and a variety of official City boards and commissions, including Planning Commission, the Monticello Economic and Industrial Development Committee, and regular guidance from the Monticello Parks Commission and Parks staff. City Council members have participated in most of the public meetings and have provided input and direction as to existing conditions, policy, and other aspects of community. The development of this plan included discussions with the Monticello School District in an effort to understand School District facilities issues, and how the City and School District might be able to work together to share and improve facilities. Input and review was received from the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council to understand the opportunities for access to that park. Although design work is taking place under that group, it has been valuable to understand how access to the park will be gained so it can be coordinated with other pathway planning begin done with this project. A public open house was held near the end of the planning period to present the draft findings and direction of the plan proposals, and to gather feedback and comments before the project was ready for formal public review. All of the aspects of this process have been important in understanding the resources which the City has in place, and in formulating its direction for the next several years. That direction begins with the next section, “Park System Objectives”. Chapter 3 - Parks System Objectives Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 3-1 Park System Objectives Parks and Pathways Role in Community Development. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan laid out a generalized Parks element which introduced the need for park development and more specific planning. Among the several recommendations made in the Comprehensive Plan, one of the key elements was a notation made with regard to the Bertram Chain of Lakes park development. In that section, the Plan observes that the amenities programmed into the park will play a major role in attracting new development to Monticello. This sentiment was reflected in the survey results as well, with a large majority of respondents citing park development as an integral component of quality of life in the community. In the past, this policy was implemented through the City’s efforts to provide parks in close proximity to all residential areas, as shown on the park coverage map in the previous chapter. The City’s objectives for park system proximity will transition under this plan from what was a heavy emphasis on neighborhood park and tot lot access to more reliance on fewer, but larger park facilities, with the focus of the system on the Bertram Chain of Lakes facility and a more extensive pathway system. The overall objective is not lost, however, only the plan for realizing the objective is changing. In the following material, a set of common objectives for parks and pathway development is laid out that is designed to integrate past park development with future park planning, acquisition, and growth. The fundamental goal from the Comprehensive Plan is reinforced with the policies in this document – providing amenities that promote the growth of high quality, move-up housing and high value jobs. Changing Park Proximity. The change from several smaller parks to fewer larger facilities reflects a number of factors, not the least of which is the extensive investment necessary to acquire and develop the Bertram Chain of Lakes. However, other prominent factors support this policy, including the following: Park Variety. In larger facilities, the City is able to provide a broader range of amenities and elements, helping each park to appeal to a wider range of age groups and users. Maintenance and Efficiencies. By focusing system growth on fewer, but larger, distinct facilities, the City’s maintenance costs can be reduced by minimizing travel time and other similar efficiencies. Park acquisition can be phased in over time when future park locations are sited to accommodate dedication by several development interests, rather than relying on each development to provide its own separate park location. Fewer, larger parks creates a greater reliance on effective pathway connections, a design preference strongly supported by respondents to the parks survey. Chapter 3 - Parks System Objectives Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 3-2 As such, the City’s park and pathway acquisition efforts will focus on supporting the development of a pathway system that provides access to primary pathway corridors less than one-half mile to most residences. Access to the primary system will be via a sub- system of sidewalks, some minor pathway development, and including some on-street pathway marking where low-volume roadways can safely support this design. As an implementation technique, the City may negotiate waivers from the sidewalk requirements (when appropriate) in exchange for pathway corridor dedications or other related improvements consistent with the parks system plans. As a final comment, although the Plan reorients the City toward more widely spaced, larger parks, proximity will still be a factor to consider as land develops. The provision of some smaller park locations may be considered appropriate where higher densities, limited access to pathway corridors, barriers to access, or other factors intervene. Thus, some small park development may still be seen as conditions warrant – the City will need to evaluate each growth area individually to ensure that park and pathway access continues to support high quality development. Seven Principles for Park Development. Reflecting these ideas, seven principles are identified as a part of this Plan that guide the City’s park and recreation planning and development. These principles are intended to serve as guiding concepts for the more specific decisions the City makes as it determines park dedication requirements for development, allocates resources for park development, and evaluates its ongoing provision of park facilities and programming for the foreseeable future. It is important to remember that Principles, or Policies, are not strategies or plans. Strategies and Plans must be tested against these principles to evaluate their effectiveness and consistency with the goals laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. As such, the comments in this section can sometimes feel overly general standing by themselves. Of course, they do not stand alone – these statements are merely the underpinnings for the more specific development choices made by City officials as the Parks and Pathways system is developed. It is also true that there are likely to be different strategies the City may follow to realize these objectives. Each decision will depend on available resources, the options presenting themselves at the time, and the nature of the community. Therefore, while specific plans and strategies may change over time – and almost certainly will – the principles stated below are more likely to remain constant. If the City finds itself disagreeing with the principles, it is past time for a update to the Plan. Accompanying each general principle below are additional explanatory statements that add depth and dimension to the principles. Chapter 3 - Parks System Objectives Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 3-3 Monticello Parks and Pathways Plan Vision and Policy Providing continuity and linkages between public parks, open spaces, residences, and businesses. o The City is expecting that the entirety of the community be interconnected through the park system and pathway plan. o The park and pathway system must continually be examined to ensure continuity as the community grows. o The pathways in the community serve as both transportation system and recreation system. Pathways must connect to desired destinations. Pathways must provide alternative routing options. Pathways must provide safe design alternatives for pedestrians and bicyclists. o Parks must be accessible by all types of transportation. Improving and increasing views to, access to, and utilization of th e Mississippi River. o The City will seek more and easier connections to areas where views of the river are available to the public. o Direct access to river use will be sought wherever public spaces permit, including those in use now, as well as those (such as existing, undeveloped right of way) that have been overlooked. o Extended frontage along the River will be protected wherever it may be available, while respecting the rights of private landowners. Providing for facilities that will serve the community in both short and long terms. o The City expects to prioritize recreational needs of the community in concert with all providers of recreation users, facilities, and programs. o Coordination among recreation providers will be critical to maximize efficiency and level of service. Allowing reasonable flexibility on final pathway routes, park locations, and plan implementation strategies. o Options change over time, and plan implementation will require regular monitoring as new options present themselves. o This plan is specific in terms of objectives, but conceptual in terms of design – design should change to reflect new alternatives that achieve the same objective. o Consideration of alternatives should begin with the specific objective and the most important components. Chapter 3 - Parks System Objectives Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 3-4 Providing a range of choices for system users. o The Plan is intended to serve all potential system users. o Advancement of healthier lifestyles implies the need to appeal to underserved users through convenience, innovation, or other methods that will increase use of the parks and pathways in Monticello. o The City will strive to provide superior recreational opportunities for all residents. Utilizing the system to assist in preserving the natural and historic nature of the community. o In creating the system, priority will be on including areas that are found to be of significance to the community. o Preferences cite interest in natural open space experiences and improved pathway continuity, choice, and alternatives. o Expand the scope of the park and pathway system to include a wider variety of recreation experience. Prioritizing the acquisition and development of Bertram Lakes Regional Park. o The unique opportunities provided by the Bertram Lakes facility will dominate Monticello’s park and pathway planning for the foreseeable future. o Focus on Bertram Lakes for many of the community park facilities that might have otherwise been originally planned throughout the community. o Identify and supplement community park facilities with opportunities for neighborhood park experiences. o Ensure extensive pathway connections to both Bertram Lakes and the community parks to mitigate for the lack of true neighborhood park proximity. o Adapt community park facilities over time to ensure a variety of park and recreation experiences for the users of the facilities as they evolve over time due to access, growth, and demographic change. Chapter 3 - Parks System Objectives Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 3-5 Park Development and Design Policies In this material, a series of models are set forth to help guide specific decisions of the City with regard to the location, acquisition, design, and development of parks and pathways. These models are generalized since the conditions encountered as a part of any particular development proposal will vary from these models. However, it is important to consider the principles presented by the models to help ensure that long-term objectives of the Parks and Pathways system are realized. Park Acquisition. As an underlying assumption, it is understood that the City will focus its acquisition efforts on the Bertram Chain of Lakes property, in concert with Wright County, and as funds become available. Acquisition of Bertram Lakes is accomplished only by the application of cash, rather than park dedication which is used when development interests are subdividing property. Future parks and primary pathways in other parts of the community will be obtained most commonly through direct land dedication as a part of the development/subdivision process, or through purchase utilizing cash collected from park dedication fees. In this regard, it is critical that park dedication (or cash acquisitions) are accomplished to accommodate the long-range plan. It is also nearly certain that these facilities will be acquired from multiple property owners to create a single facility. Acquisition, then, will require case-by-case decision making, in keeping with the plans Figure 3-1 adopted as part of this document, and Park Acquisition Model consistent with the long-term open space and recreation needs of the property. In the accompanying illustration, a series of dedications is made to create a single larger park facility that serves a broad area of development, rather than a series of individual smaller park installations. The key to this approach will be: (1) Siting park dedication areas to accommodate future expansions by dedication or acquisition from neighboring development, and (2) Preserving corridors of adequate width for access to the City’s pathway system so residents from the general community can utilize the park through safe and attractive pedestrian and/or bicycle access. Chapter 3 - Parks System Objectives Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 3-6 Community Park. This drawing illustrates a common community park configuration, based on active recreation and programming. Where the City has existing community parks with active recreation, it is important to examine the facilities needs and balance those with the assets of the park in question. There are many models for parks that serve as community-wide facilities. Some of these can be smaller but because of location or special elements will end up serving a wider audience than their size might normally suggest. Many community parks will also serve the neighborhood as its primary local park. In addition, a common community park model would be an area of unique natural environmental features that cannot be replicated Figure 3-2 in other locations. As noted in the existing Community Park Model systems discussion previously, a strong interest in access to such areas was expressed in the responses to the survey. For such parks, the types of elements and activities can vary widely, depending on the location and assets of the property. It would be common to seek a community park that includes natural spaces, as well as more active recreation in appropriate locations. An essential component of any Community Park is its provision for Primary or Secondary Pathway access. Use: Area of diverse environmental quality which may include areas suited to intense recreational facilities such as athletic complexes as well as passive type areas, depends largely upon the site location, suitability, and community need Service Area: Several neighborhoods, 1 to 4 mile radius Population Served: All ages, toddler to retiree, entire community for cities up to 25,000 Desirable Size: 20 to 35+ acres Site Characteristics: Provides for a combination of intensive and non-intensive development ranging from play equipment to pathways. May include natural features, such as waterbodies or forested land, must include support elements such as restrooms, drinking water, parking, lighting. Uses should complement those found in a community playfield and should provide diversity in facilities or use areas. Typical Elements: Ballfields, tennis courts, skating rinks, pedestrian and bicycle pathways, picnic areas, off-street parking Chapter 3 - Parks System Objectives Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 3-7 Neighborhood Park.This graphic illustrates a common layout for a neighborhood park embedded within a residential neighborhood, and with the role of providing open space and informal recreation. In some cases, the informal recreation space provides practice field locations for organized sports that would use competition fields elsewhere in the community. Neighborhood parks are most often located in such a way that Primary or Secondary Pathways do not provide direct access, and as such, rely on local sidewalks or minor neighborhood pathways for residents to utilize them. Parking space for vehicles is, as a result, not a common element in these parks. As has been discussed previously, this Plan around the expectation that few neighborhood parks will be created as the community grows. Rather, new park development, and the facilities traditionally provided by new neighborhood parks, will occur Figure 3-3 primarily within Bertram Chain of Lakes, or at Neighborhood Park Model larger community park locations – either existing or future. Critical to the success of this approach is proper community park location, and most importantly, extensive pathway development that will serve as park and open space of itself. Use: Area for designated active and passive recreation areas Service Area: ½ to 1 mile radius to serve a population of up to 5,000 persons (a large neighborhood) Population Served: Focus upon ages 5 through 39 with emphasis upon ages 5 through 18 Desirable Size: 5 to 10 acres Site Characteristics: Suited for multi-use development, easily accessible to neighborhood population, geographically centered with safe walking and bike access, may include school facilities Typical Elements: Play equipment, walking paths, picnic areas, limited fields Chapter 3 - Parks System Objectives Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 3-8 Pathways. As has been mentioned previously, the City has developed a wide variety of pathway models. It is the intention of this Plan to categorize Pathway planning and development according to three styles of Pathway – Primary Pathways, Secondary Pathways, and Sidewalks/Minor Pathways. Primary Pathways are characterized by a greenway style of design with an exceptionally wide corridor in which the pathway is the primary mode of transportation. Secondary Pathways are also commonly found in wide corridors, but will typically share that corridor with a major roadway. Sidewalks and Minor Pathways almost always follow a local or collector street, providing access to local properties. Each category has its exceptions to design and routing, but these three models can help distinguish between future design and construction, as well as near term maintenance responsibilities and role in the system. In the following sections, each model is described as to its standard application, as well as the most common exceptions. Sidewalks and Minor Pathways. In developing Monticello’s pathway system, there are three essential types of pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities to be considered. The first is serving neighborhood access as a purely local route, whether that is for a short walk, or providing a transportation route to a specific location. Locations might include a neighborhood park, a nearby business, school, or other land use, or a route to the larger “trunk” pathway route. Neighborhood pedestrian improvements may take many forms, the most dominant of which would be a local sidewalk. Such improvements are commonly of concrete construction, five to six feet in width, and set within the public street right of way at or near the boundary line between the private property and the area of public use. The City’s Engineering Design Standards and Specifications should be consulted for the most current design requirements. In some cases, these improvements (again, serving local neighborhood needs specifically) have been constructed as asphalt surfaces of usually eight feet in width. These minor pathways serve essentially the same purpose as sidewalks, and should be considered the same for maintenance purposes, differing only in design and materials, but not in function. Occasionally, neighborhoods will rely on on-street pedestrian/bicycle routes where sidewalk construction in not practical for some reason, or where traffic volumes are so low as to make grade-separation clearly unneeded. Short cul-de-sac streets would be one example of these conditions. An alternative in this vein would be striping of on-street ped/bike lanes where justified, but where street vehicular traffic levels suggest a safer design. Where these options are permitted, a developer should expect to provide compensatory contribution to park dedication (land or cash as directed by the City) in lieu of normal sidewalk. Figure 3-4 below illustrates a typical cross-section of a local street with an accompanying sidewalk providing local pedestrian and (sometimes) bicycle use. Chapter 3 - Parks System Objectives Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 3-9 Figure 3-4 Sidewalk/Minor Pathway Cross Section View Secondary Pathways. Whereas sidewalks serve local neighborhoods, pathways serve the broader community as both transportation routes and as linear park and recreation resources. This Plan recognizes two tiers of pathway development. In urbanized areas where the pathway follows or adjoins a major roadway, most pathways will serve as “secondary” pathways for their entire length. The main condition separating most secondary pathways from primary pathway routes would be the potential for barrier interruption, particularly due to the need for freeway or railroad crossings. Secondary pathways may have these issues – Primary routes should be designed to avoid them. These routes will primarily consist of eight to ten foot wide asphalt paths constructed within the right of way, but in most cases, separated from the traffic by a boulevard strip of varying width. Within the boulevard, there should be room set aside for tree planting, street and pathway lighting, and other amenities. There are a few significant existing exception to this standard, found where Trunk Highway 25 and County Highway 39 cross Interstate 94. Due to the width and construction of these bridges, this Secondary Pathway is a raised concrete sidewalk immediately adjacent to the traffic lanes. The cross section view below in Figure 3-5 illustrates a common Secondary Pathway arrangement. Chapter 3 - Parks System Objectives Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 3-10 Figure 3-5 Secondary Pathway Cross Section View Where adequate right of way exists, the pathway itself should be separated from the travelled roadway a distance of ten feet or more to permit minimum interference from plowed snow. In some cases, a sidewalk on the side opposite the pathway will also be considered appropriate, depending on the land uses in the area and the opportunities for crossing the roadway. As a design element for urban pathways, planting on the “outside” of the pathway, creating a landscaped buffer between the path and private property is also a positive element. This buffer is not intended to be opaque, but rather, a intermittent line of small trees and shrubs that enhance the visual impact of the pathway and help to provide shade from that direction of sun. Primary Pathway. Where the pathway route will be located on undeveloped or newly developing property, or in otherwise rural locations, the recommendation is for primary pathway construction as a natural greenway. In urban locations where the pathway route has been designated as primary, a design similar to that of the secondary pathway is more practical. Where greenway is being developed, a corridor width of between 100 and 200 feet is recommended. This corridor should be adequate to accomplish several objectives of the greenway concept, including: Preservation of valuable natural landscape features. Protection of existing water resources. Provision of new water resources, such as pond locations (that can serve to facilitate area stormwater management needs, as well as off-set park dedication credits). Chapter 3 - Parks System Objectives Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 3-11 Creation of natural environment that buffers pathway users from developing urban neighborhoods. Provides adequate width for park facilities improvements within the corridor, avoiding further park acquisition. Provides adequate width for multiple use pathway development, including pedestrian, bicycle, cross-country ski, and similar use. The primary pathway system would be comprised of routes that are least likely to have barrier interruptions so they can be assured of continuity. As noted above, freeway and railroad crossings should be minimized, and connections between the most visible and heavily used recreation facilities should be expected along primary routes. Figure 3-6 Primary Pathway Cross Section View Chapter 4 - Parks and Pathways System Plan Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 4-1 Parks and Pathways System Plan The Parks and Pathways System Plan sets forth the plans and strategies that guide specific actions of the City in ongoing operation, new acquisition, development and planning. The system plan builds on the existing conditions and system objectives by identifying gaps between current reality and vision, then going on to establish a set of physical plans for the long-range organization and development of Monticello’s recreation system. To this point, the following summary of findings, issues, and principles guide the creation of the Plan: The investment in the Bertram Chain of Lakes park facility will dominate the community’s park acquisition and development for the foreseeable future. This investment drives Monticello to look toward the creation of fewer new park facilities during the planning period. The community has expressed a desire to continue parkland development but with a focus on specific aspects of recreation, including; More emphasis on pathway development, including continuity, increased options and loops, and connections to parks, business areas, and schools. Increased emphasis on water-oriented access and recreation, both natural and man-made, including Bertram Lakes, the Mississippi River, and other areas. Expanded opportunities for natural open space experiences. Support for Monticello Community Center facilities, expanding access, choice, and hours where possible. The new facilities that are to be considered will be concentrated in fewer, larger park locations, especially Bertram Chain of Lakes, and a few new locations that maximize opportunity for natural open space. Occasional smaller facilities may be developed when densities, barriers, or other conditions call for additional park locations to ensure adequate proximity and coverage. Focus on increased athletic field development, particularly youth baseball and soccer. Concentrate athletic fields in a few locations, particularly the opportunities at Bertram Lakes, to facilitate the attraction of tournament play, and to minimize common infrastructure such as maintenance needs, concession buildings, lights, and other similar elements. Chapter 4 - Parks and Pathways System Plan Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 4-2 Organize the pathway system to create a more predictable chain of community-wide pathway routes, in concert with neighborhood pedestrian and bicycle access to the community-wide system. Establish a primary system of pathways that minimize interruptions and conflicts, capitalizing on both existing infrastructure and opportunities for continuous routes. Follow up the primary system with secondary pathway loop connections, creating a system of inter-connected loops that maximize choice in trip length, route variety, and destination. Pathway loops should range between three and seven miles, depending on the web of local connections available. For local connections, encourage subdivision design that creates safe – as well as efficient - neighborhood sidewalk development, utilizing on-street options where appropriate. Make local pedestrian and bicycle transportation a fundamental part of subdivision design, rather than an after-thought once a development plan is finished. Be r t r a m C h a i n o f L a k e s R e g i o n a l P a r k Mo n t i s s i p p i C o u n t y P a r k Li t t l e M o u n t a i n , M o n t i c e ll o , a n d E a s t v i e w S c h o o l s Wa t e r T o w e r P a r k Mo n t i c e l l o M i d d l e S c h o o l Pi o n e e r P a r k ( L i o n s P a r k ) Pi n e w o o d E a s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Ri v e r M i l l P a r k El l i s o n P a r k Su n s e t P o n d s P a r k Fr e e w a y F i e l d s Me a d o w O a k s P a r k Ci t y / X c e l B a l l f i e l d s Pa r W e s t P a r k Hu n t e r ' s C r o s s i n g Gr o v e l a n d P a r k 4t h S t P a r k Fe a t h e r s t o n e Hi l l c r e s t P a r k We s t B r i d g e P a r k Ca r d i n a l H i l l s P a r k Ba l b o u l P a r k Ea s t B r i d g e P a r k Fa l l o n P a r k Co u n t r y C l u b P a r k Ba t t l e C r e e k P a r k Pa r k s i d e P a r k Ro l l i n g W o o d s P a r k Fr o n t S t P a r k Ca r d i n a l H i l l s T o t L o t P a r k Ot t e r C r e e k P a r k Mi s s i s s i p p i D r i v e ( S w a n P a r k ) Si l v e r S p r i n g s G o l f C o u r s e Mo n t i c e l l o C o u n t r y C l u b Ce d a r L a k e Pe l i c a n L a k e No r t h L a k e Lo n g L a k e Be r t r a m L a k e Un n a m e d Mu d L a k e Sl o u g h Fi r s t L a k e St a l o c h P o n d Ho l k e r s S l o u g h Park and Trail Plan Future park System Service Area Existing & Future Community Parks (1 mile)Neighborhood Parks (1/2 Mile)Community Park Search Areas Parks Golf Courses School Property City-Owned Property Bike Pathway Sidewalk Lakes CityBoundary Parcels STATE HIGHWAY 25 NE FENNING AVE NE FALLON AVE CHELSEA RD EDMUNSON AVE SCHOOL BLVD 9 0 T H S T S E C H E L S E A R D W RIVER ST 7 T H ST E Co m m u n i t y C e n t e r §¨¦94 COUNTY ROAD 18 State Highway 25 County Road 75 C OUNTY ROAD 39 Sources: City of Monticello, Wright County, WSB, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Map Date: 05/19/2011. Co u n t y R o a d 3 9 N E M ississ i p pi R i v e r SH E R B U R N E C O U N T Y WR I G H T C O U N T Y 04,5009,0002,250 Feet¯ Chapter 4 - Parks and Pathways System Plan Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 4-4 The previous map builds on the existing park coverage map by adding three potential community park locations to the analysis. The map illustrates that the identified community park search areas would, utilizing just a one-mile radius, accomplish a number of objectives identified above. These locations were selected from the City’s Natural Resources Inventory, which analyzed the City’s long-range growth area. These three sites were identified as being characterized by significant and unique environmental qualities. The advantages of these community park search area locations are as follows: Rural areas provide the opportunity to acquire adequate land area to accomplish the community park purposes identified previously. The areas qualify as locations which will satisfy the interest in natural open space experiences, varying from water access, extensive natural views, wildlife quality and diversity, topographic interest, and vegetative cover. The three search areas provide attractive park nodes along a greenway path that respond to recommendations from the Natural Resources Inventory and Assesment. The greenway connections will facilitate pathway access to these sites. Each of the three locations is on or near an existing major transportation routes that will accommodate connections to secondary pathway routes. In applying these search areas, the recommendations of the NRI/A, and the inter- connected looping of primary and secondary pathways, a schematic park and pathways system plan can be assembled, shown on the following page. ")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")") ")")")")")")")")")")")") ") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")") ") ") ") ")")")")")")")")")")")")") ") " ) ")") ") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")")")")")")")")")")")")") ") ") ") ")")")")") ")")")")") ") ") ") ")")")") ") ") ") ") " ) ")")")")")")") ") ")")") ") ")")")")") ") ")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")")")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")") ") ")")")")") ")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")")") ")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")") ")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")") ")")")")") ")")")")")")")")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")") ") ")")")")")")")")")")")")") ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) ) ) ) ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) ))) ))))))) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )))) ) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))))))))))) )) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ))))))))))) ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) ) ) ) ) )))))))))))")")")") ") ") ") )))) )))))))))))))))))))))))) )))))))))))))) Ed m o n s o n C o m m u n i t y P a r k S e a r c h A r e a Pe l i c a n L a k e C o m m u n i t y P a r k S e a r c h A r e a Di t c h 3 3 C o m m u n i t y Park Search Area Be r t r a m C h a i n o f L a k e s R e g i o n a l P a r k Mo n t i s s i p p i C o u n t y P a r k Li t t l e M o u n t a i n , M o n t i c e ll o , a n d E a s t v i e w S c h o o l s Wa t e r T o w e r P a r k Mo n t i c e l l o M i d d l e S c h o o l Pi o n e e r P a r k ( L i o n s P a r k ) Pi n e w o o d E a s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Ri v e r M i l l P a r k El l i s o n P a r k Su n s e t P o n d s P a r k Fr e e w a y F i e l d s Me a d o w O a k s P a r k Ci t y / X c e l B a l l f i e l d s Pa r W e s t P a r k Hu n t e r ' s C r o s s i n g Gr o v e l a n d P a r k 4t h S t P a r k Fe a t h e r s t o n e Hi l l c r e s t P a r k We s t B r i d g e P a r k Ca r d i n a l H i l l s P a r k Ba l b o u l P a r k Ea s t B r i d g e P a r k Fa l l o n P a r k Co u n t r y C l u b P a r k Ba t t l e C r e e k P a r k Pa r k s i d e P a r k Ro l l i n g W o o d s P a r k Fr o n t S t P a r k Ca r d i n a l H i l l s T o t L o t P a r k Ot t e r C r e e k P a r k Mi s s i s s i p p i D r i v e ( S w a n P a r k ) Si l v e r S p r i n g s G o l f C o u r s e Mo n t i c e l l o C o u n t r y C l u b Pe l i c a n L a k e Ce d a r L a k e No r t h L a k e Lo n g L a k e Be r t r a m L a k e Un n a m e d Mu d L a k e Sl o u g h Fi r s t L a k e St a l o c h P o n d Ho l k e r s S l o u g h Pa r a d i s e Park and Trail Plan Draft System Plan Potential Trail Routes ")")")")Primary Pathway Routes ))))))Secondary Pathway Routes Community Park Search Areas Parks Golf Courses School Property City-Owned Property Bike Pathway Sidewalk Lakes CityBoundary Parcels STATE HIGHWAY 25 NE FENNING AVE NE FALLON AVE CHELSEA RD EDMUNSON AVE SCHOOL BLVD 9 0 T H S T S E C H E L S E A R D W RIVER ST 7 T H ST E Co m m u n i t y C e n t e r §¨¦94 COUNTY ROAD 18 State Highway 25 County Road 75 C O U NTY ROAD 39 Sources: City of Monticello, Wright County, WSB, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Map Date: 05/06/2011. Co u n t y R o a d 3 9 N E M ississ i p pi R i v e r SH E R B U R N E C O U N T Y WR I G H T C O U N T Y 04,5009,0002,250 Feet¯ Chapter 4 - Parks and Pathways System Plan Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 4-6 The system plan on the previous page is generalized in that it illustrates a potential series of pathways and park locations based on the summary discussion at the top of this chapter. It is important to apply the recommendations of this document generally, rather than specifically. To do this, it is necessary to identify the objectives of each component of the plan as it is being implemented. For instance, each pathway segment connects two points, and will travel through certain territory. When acquiring pathway routes, finding the route option that best meets the objectives of this Plan. Specific Park Recommendations As discussed above, the schematic system plan proposes three potential community park locations that will serve recreation needs in newly developing areas, and accomplish the objectives identified in this document. In this section, each of these three locations is discussed as to their assets and potential. As also discussed, these locations are intended to be general search areas, with the expectation that park layout and acquisition will occur as a component of new subdivision design. For each map included in this plan, the boundary lines indicate current property ownership patterns, only for the purpose of understanding options. Park dimensions will ultimately reflect the design and layout of the subdivisions that facilitate dedication and other acquisition efforts. Hamlin Marsh (Ditch 33) Community Park Search Area This search area comprises the eastern-most extent of Monticello’s growth district, encompassing a portion of the County Ditch 33 drainage area. Ditch 33 has a history of flooding, and has created an extensive wetland marsh in this area, even backing up into areas south of I-94. The Natural Resource Inventory identified this area as a high-value environment. In the past few years, properties containing or abutting the flood plain and marsh were subject to development proposals and park dedication options were investigated at that time. One of the features of this park location would be the opportunity to create a trailhead location at the entry point to the greenway along County Highway 39. This trailhead would provide an opportunity for visitors to the system to park vehicles and view information about Monticello’s park and pathway system as they plan their travel. As a component of this project, the City is also cataloguing historic sites and information, and the trailhead provides a location for information about local businesses and other points of interest. This park search area has been referred to as “Hamlin Marsh” in this document due to its general alignment with the County’s street naming convention. Hamlin Marsh Community Park Search Area & Trailhead Chapter 4 - Parks and Pathways System Plan Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 4-8 Pelican Lake Community Park Search Area Moving along the greenway, the pathway encounters the freeway at the south end of the marsh. This Plan anticipates a freeway crossing as a long-range component of the greenway. There are options for either an overpass due to a high point to the east, or an underpass along the alignment of Haug Avenue on the west. The underpass option may have some issues with water, and would be more dependent on coordination with freeway construction. Without a freeway crossing, pathway continuity will depend on traveling to the west to cross at County Highway 18, then following that route south toward the north shore of Pelican Lake. A secondary pathway is anticipated to generally follow Fenning Avenue, veering to the east as the path nears the lake to take advantage of a woodland area north of County Highway 37. Pelican Lake is a large, shallow water resource that provides waterfowl and fish habitat, and is being managed for increased waterfowl production in the future. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has acquired a large property on the north shore of the lake, as well as other acquisitions along the shore to the south. The state is working toward a project that will reduce water levels to enhance the lake’s waterfowl production. Hunting will be a major activity in this area during migration periods. Access to the land adjacent to the shore provides a tremendous opportunity to establish a facility that capitalizes on views of thousands of acres of natural resource area, along with areas that could eventually serve more active recreation. Prairie restoration in portions of this park area, particularly on the higher knobs, could create an extensive environment reflecting pre-settlement land cover that is rarely found. The proposed park concept on the following page illustrates some of the assets of the area, and how the greenway and related pathway access could utilize the area. Pe l i c a n L a k e C o m m u n i t y P a r k S e a r c h A r e a Chapter 4 - Parks and Pathways System Plan Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 4-10 Edmonson Greenway Community Park Search Area Passing north of County Highway 39 to the west, the greenway encounters a wetland and pond system flanking Edmonson Avenue (County 117). This area is characterized by a wide variety of environments, from woodlands, to shoreline, to open land, to an area of hillside cedar trees. The greenway path is programmed to wind its way through this area, crossing Edmonson where it splits the extensive linked ponds east and west. The variety of land cover and topography around this location provides a wide range of recreation opportunities, including picnic locations, wildlife viewing, and more active athletic recreational opportunities on land outside of the more natural areas. The location of this site is also accessible from the rest of the community. Edmonson follows a route to the north that runs between residential, commercial, and industrial areas until its northern terminus at Chelsea Road, a major east-west street that parallels the freeway. From this point, the greenway continues to the west and turns northwest as it crosses Trunk Highway 25, eventually reaching the southeast boundary of the Bertram Chain of Lakes property north of County 106. As discussed previously, pathway loops in this area are designed to be a maximum of about seven miles for a complete transit, although several options between primary and secondary pathway routes would exist. Following the greenway route through the Bertram Lakes property, it would extend to the northwest and a freeway crossing at the current overpass location on County 75. After crossing the freeway, the greenway connects with the Broadway Path, and also reaches Wright County’s Montissippi Park along the river. A trailhead at the Broadway Path crossing would be a valuable addition to the greenway at this western end of the system. Ed m o n s o n G r e e n w a y C o m m u n i t y P a r k S e a r c h A r e a Chapter 4 - Parks and Pathways System Plan Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 4-12 Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. As the primary focus of the City’s current park acquisition and development activities, is it appropriate to provide additional clarity to the role that this major facility will play in the City’s parks system. As often mentioned in this document, Bertram Lakes will quickly become the City’s most heavily used facility due to its natural beauty, its diversity of land forms, and its access to water – especially with the provision of an outdoor swimming beach – an amenity not currently available to the community. Bertram is already among the most often visited of Monticello parks, even though its facilities are largely undeveloped and only partially available to the general public. As the acquisition goes forward, the City and County, guided by a joint organization known as the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council, has been working on planning for the development of the park. Planning is preliminary at this stage, but has taken advantage of the park’s broad array of unique spaces and opportunities. The greatest level of activity is located in the northern portion of the 1,200 acre property. Park elements include potential for camping, active recreation on the lake, including swimming, fishing piers, and non-motorized boating. A significant portion of this area for the City would be the opportunity to develop a major multi-use athletic complex on what is currently farmed land. As noted in other sections of this document, numerous groups have cited a need to increase the number of sports fields for competition, practice, and tournament play. The bulk of the property has been programmed at this conceptual stage as more passive recreational pursuits, including an extensive system of unsurfaced trails. As the Parks and Pathways plan notes, Bertram Lakes will provide a significant percentage of the City’s park development, and access is critical to its ability to serve in this role. Moreover, the Chain of Lakes is a part of the identified greenway route. As such, it is important that design development for Bertram Chain of Lakes accommodates the City’s pathway system, including paved routes that will provide continuity with the remainder of the City’s Primary Pathway routes. Working these improvements into the Bertram design should be a priority of the City’s representation on the Advisory Council. On the following page, a preliminary sketch of the possible improvements for the north side of the Bertram Chain of Lakes facility is provided for illustration purposes. Because of the early stage of design, changes to this plan are likely before development proceeds. Instead, the intent of the inclusion of this sketch plan is to show possibilities rather than identify outcomes for the park. Chapter 5 - Implementation Options Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 5-1 Implementation Options This section of the Park and Pathways System Plan identifies the tools and processes to implement the Plan. Because Park Dedication is the primary method for obtaining park land and funds, outside of the grants that have facilitated the acquisition of Bertram Lakes, the last portion of this chapter addresses the park dedication process more specifically, based on the City’s land use and growth projections. It is the intent of this section to provide a framework for park dedication requirements, however, since the City’s growth and development change routinely, along with land prices and other relevant factors, it is anticipated that the City will conduct a more routine analysis of its park dedication requirements on a regular basis. Implementation Strategies The following implementation strategies are suggested: 1. The Parks Commission will review and update neighborhood park needs and service areas as development occurs so that new barriers and changing recreational needs are acknowledged and accommodated. 2. The Parks Commission will review and evaluate each development project to ensure it provides appropriate park land dedication, open space preservation and pathway connections to the planned city wide park, pathway, greenway, schools, and commercial/industrial developments as well as the town center. 3. The Parks Commission will review and prioritize pathway needs and recommend a schedule and funding framework to the City Council. 4. The Parks Commission will investigate the use of grants, donations, partnerships, and opportunities for joint powers agreements for the development of park, pathway and recreation facilities. 6. The park dedication fee should be reviewed on an annual basis and updated pursuant to any changes to the Parks and Pathways System Plan and adjusted for cost of living indexes. 7. The Parks Commission recommends that the City Council consider incorporating park redevelopment infrastructure planning as part of the five year Capital Improvements Plan. Minnesota Statutes specify that park dedication fees may not be used for maintenance purposes and therefore it is important for the City to continue to provide a separate budget fund for maintenance. As the park system ages, there will be an increased need to retrofit existing facilities, as they will have aged beyond their useful life in the older parks. Park dedication fees can be used to replace some facilities and Chapter 5 - Implementation Options Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 5-2 infrastructure however, the City will need to establish other sources to pay for replacement of the park system facilities in fully development neighborhoods or park service areas. 8. The Parks Commission recommendations for future land dedication will be based on the park land need defined by the Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan. Active park areas shall be exclusive of wetlands, slopes exceeding 12 percent, ponding areas, or other features unsuitable for active park development. The City may accept natural open space as part of the parkland dedication. Selection of parkland for dedication shall be at the discretion of the City Council, based upon the policies and recommendations of the Parks Commission and Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan. 9. The Parks Commission will act as the steering committee to further investigate options and agency participation for development of natural resource corridors and the City’s pathway system outside of the current planning area. 10. The Parks Commission will work closely with the Planning Commission in reviewing proposed subdivisions for park and pathway dedication requirements, including whether or not to recommend the dedication of land, or cash in lieu of land. 11. For recreation programming, the City could choose to take a more active role in coordinating recreation activities – in most cases, working with existing associations, schools, and community education representatives to facilitate and schedule programming. To date, Monticello has not participated in this aspect of park and recreation planning, providing facilities but not programs (with the notable exception of the Monticello Community Center). Further study would be necessary to determine the value and impacts of the City’s participation in this kind of effort. Funding Mechanisms Financing the park and pathway improvements will be a challenge for the City. The acquisition and development of the park and pathway system will not occur without adequate funding and taking advantage of opportunities as they present themselves. Fortunately, in the short term, the City owns a significant portion of the land needed to meet the community park facilities identified in this plan. The financing of the park and pathway system will occur one of two ways, either by raising revenue or incurring debt. Revenues provide the means to make investments in the park system and can be saved to finance improvements. Borrowing money provides upfront funding and pledges to repay the dept. A brief description of potential funding sources is provided as follows: Park Dedication. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes, the City requires the dedication of either land or cash, or combination thereof at the time that residential Chapter 5 - Implementation Options Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 5-3 property is subdivided. Dollars collected from park dedication fees represent the primary source of park and pathway revenue. Property Taxes. The City has the ability to raise property taxes to help to pay for the park and pathway system. As this Plan indicates, the current population has paid for more than their proportionate share of park and pathway improvements. However, this may not continue to the case. In the event that future changes to the Parks and Pathways System Plan, growth projections, land areas subject to the dedication analysis or other changes occur, the park dedication will need to be reviewed and adjusted accordingly. Property taxes are a means to raise revenue for the part of the parks and pathways system that should be borne by existing residents. The use of property tax may be limited by overall financial management of the City or by State imposed levy limitations. Special Assessments. The ability of a city to levy assessments for park improvements is governed by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This statute defines eligible park improvements as “acquire, improve and equip parks, open space areas, playgrounds, and recreational facilities within or without the corporate limits.” This definition would cover the vast majority of projects anticipated by this Plan. A special assessment represents the portion of a park improvement costs levied against benefiting properties. The special assessment tool must be reviewed carefully to identify whether historic park dedication fees have been collected and applied to the benefiting properties to ensure that owners are not charged twice for park and pathway improvements. Moreover, an analysis would need to be done to identify which properties receive benefit from the park and pathway improvement as there must be a rational nexus between the charge and benefit received. The typical method would be to levy an equal assessment on each benefiting parcel. The assessment could be for all or any portion of the improvements. At least 20% of the costs of the improvement must be assessed to gain the authority to issue bonds. If less than 100% of the costs are assessed, then park dedication fees, property taxes, or other available revenues would be needed to pay back the dept. Referendum – Voter Approved Bonds. The City may place a referendum on voter ballets for consideration by the public to support park and pathway improvements. Voter approved debt service levies are spread on the market value of property. This funding mechanism is typically utilized for major improvements such as a community center, athletic complex or to acquire high amenity park and recreation areas. Cooperative Funding. Opportunities may exist for joint funding and facilities sharing between the City and Monticello School District. These options can increase the scope of those participating in the funding choice. With coordination, the prospect of duplicating capital improvements is minimized. Chapter 5 - Implementation Options Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 5-4 Grants. The City should continue to apply for available grants for development of its Parks and Pathways Plan through agencies such as but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Transportation, and any other agency. Private Donations. The City should establish a list of facilities that can be provided to the public, charitable institutions, on the City Website etc., identifying Park and Pathway needs and the process the public can use to donate revenue or equipment. Additionally, the Parks Commission could proactively contact private foundations such as The Trust for Public Land, 1,000 Friends of Minnesota, McKnight Foundation, Metro Greenways and others to identify potential funding sources for the community Park and Pathway System. Park Dedication The City sets a park dedication requirement in its subdivision ordinance. Under state law, the City may require a subdivider to dedicate a reasonable portion of land for public park purposes, or the City may acquire an amount of cash in lieu of the required land, provided that the amount is based on the value of the land that would have been dedicated. The statute provides that this amount is to be no greater than the value of the land “no later than at the time of final plat”. In other words, the value is essentially that value of platted lots, but without the value of public infrastructure. Because the cost of developing a park system includes the cost of building improvements, cash donated for parks can be used for improvements, but the amount of the dedication may not be included in the dedication calculation. Therefore, a deficit between the cost of the built-up park system and the value of land dedication is inevitable. As such, it is important that while the City may require dedication, additional funds are necessary to develop the park system as planned. For the dedication amount itself, there are two methods to consider when setting a dedication amount. One is to measure the amount of acreage required as a percentage of the City’s overall acreage. The second is to measure the amount of acreage required as a percentage of the City’s projected population. Percentage of Gross Acreage Method. For the first method, the City would calculate the amount of current park and pathway acreage, along with the acreage of the City overall, and establish the percentage of total parkland that is provided. As the City grows in acreage, the City would establish a dedication requirement that maintains a similar percentage for park land. In projecting this to a finite growth area, the City can calculate the size of the growth area, then apply the percentage to obtain an acreage that would be expected to be dedicated as parkland over the planning period. Since the City only requires park dedication from Chapter 5 - Implementation Options Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 5-5 residential subdivisions, the amount of acreage to obtain would be pro-rated over the number of acres of future residential land. As an example, assume that the City currently provides approximately 9% of its gross area as public parkland. If the future growth area comprises 1,000 acres of gross land area, then the City would expect to require dedication of an additional 90 acres of parkland during the planning period required to see this area fully developed. However, assume further that the 1,000 acre growth area will be comprised of 70% residential land, and 30% for other uses, such as commercial, industrial, water surfaces, public rights of way, and other uses. In this case, then, 700 acres of residential land would need to dedicate 90 acres of land for park purposes. In this calculation, the park dedication requirement would then need to be set at 12.9% to reach the required park acreage (90 acres divided by 700 acres = 12.9%). Since the City will want land from some subdividers, but cash from others where land is not projected for parks or pathways, the cash-in-lieu requirement must be calculated. Taking the same 90 acres required from 1,000 gross acres or 700 acres of residential land, the cash requirement must be equivalent to the value of 90 acres of platted, undeveloped land. This value will change regularly, especially in today’s unpredictable real estate environment. However, assume an appraiser states that the value of such property is $30,000 per acre. A developer of 100 acres of residential land would normally be required to dedicate 12.9% of the land, or 12.9 acres in our example, for parkland purposes. If the City chooses to require cash, rather than land, the cash requirement would then be a simple factor of 12.9 times $30,000, or $387,000. The City may choose to split the dedication by requiring some land and some cash. In such a case, the City would simply pro-rate the amounts based on the relatively percentage of land being required versus cash-in-lieu of land. This calculation is complicated somewhat when the City decides to defer collection of the cash payment until building permit, as often happens. In this case, then, bulk cash payment must be assigned to individual lots on a pro rata basis. The issue that arises is that the per lot cash payment will vary based on the density of the subdivision, and thus, the cash payment requirement would vary with each subdivision – a difficult, if not impossible, administrative tracking function. To resolve this, most communities will make a representative estimate of overall residential density and assign a flat-rate cash requirement per lot. This creates a disparity between the fee charged and the demand created by the subdivision. However, it is easier to track the fee requirement if a consistent per-lot fee is established. Percentage of Population Method. The second model is different from the first only in that the City makes an estimate of the population of a given subdivision based on standard expectations for housing density and household size (persons per household). In this model, the City would establish a requirement for park dedication that is expressed as a number of acres per 100 or 1,000 population. The City would use census data to project the population Chapter 5 - Implementation Options Monticello Parks and Pathways System Plan Page 5-6 of a given subdivision, then apply the park dedication formula on that basis to establish the amount of acreage required for dedication. The same conversion to a cash equivalent would apply as in the first method. By applying either of these formulas to the City’s growth area and its land use plan, a representative requirement for park dedication can be established. Planning Framework | 1-12008 Comprehensive Plan 1 Monticello is fortunate to possess many assets, including a beautiful setting, an excellent location, and a rich heritage. Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks to use, preserve and enhance these assets in building a great place to live, work, shop and play. Monticello off ers housing choices that fi t all stages of a person’s life. Exist- ing neighborhoods are the foundation of the community. Th e Plan seeks to promote pride in property that results in maintenance and reinvestment to sustain these great places to live. Looking to 2030, Monticello seeks to expand the supply of “move up” housing that allows people to upgrade their home without leaving the community. As the population ages, the elderly will be drawn to Monticello because of the housing and health care options. Monticello provides the types and quality of services and amenities required to attract and keep people in Monticello. Key among these factors are: An excellent public education system. Access to a wide range of quality health care services. An unequaled system of parks, trails and recreation facilities including the unique assets of the Monticello Community Center, the Mississippi River and continued focus on the potential conversion of YMCA Camp Manitou into a regional park. A downtown area that combines a successful commercial district, com- munity identity and heritage with connection to the Mississippi River. A thriving place of commerce that provides needed goods and services through businesses that are engaged in the civic life of Monticello. Monticello seeks a wide range of employment opportunities with a growing emphasis on jobs at higher wage levels that allow more people to live and work in Monticello. Th rough a combination of location and community characteristics, Monti- cello has the opportunity to become an important regional center for jobs, shopping and health care between the Twin Cities and St. Cloud. Monticello seeks to seize this opportunity in a manner that benefi ts the community. te to possess many assets, including a beautiful setting, l d b f l , and a rich heritage. Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks enhance these assets in building a great place to live, Planning Framework Chapter Contents Overview of the Plan ..................1-2 Role of the Plan .........................1-2 Th e 2008 Update ......................1-2 Organization of the Plan .........1-3 Authority to Plan ........................1-4 Using the Plan ...........................1-4 Adopting the Plan ....................1-4 Amending the Plan ..................1-4 Annual Updates ........................1-5 Modifying Land Use Controls 1-5 Nonconforming Uses ..............1-6 Subdivision Regulations .........1-6 Project Evaluation ......................1-6 What is a Project? ....................1-6 Next Steps ....................................1-7 Zoning Ordinance....................1-7 Subdivision Regulations .........1-7 Park Dedication Ordinance ...1-7 Natural Resources Inventory .1-7 Transportation Plan .................1-8 Downtown .................................1-8 Financial Management Plan ..1-8 Parks | 5-12008 Comprehensive Plan Th e term “parks” does not adequately describe the breadth of the this chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Th ere are many facets to the park system in Monticello: Parks are public spaces developed as places to play and gather. Parks include facilities for organized and unstructured outdoor rec- reational activities. Parks provide a means of preserving open space, natural resources and wildlife habitat. Trails allow access to parks and connect individual parks into a sys- tem. Th e primary focus of the Comprehensive Plan is on parks owned and main- tained by the City of Monticello. Th e Monticello School District, Wright County and the State of Minnesota are also important providers of park, recreation and open space facilities for the residents of Monticello. Th e park system is an essential part of the quality of life in Monticello. Parks play an important role in making Monticello an active and healthy place to live. Parks are integral parts of Monticello neighborhoods. A direct link exists between parks, recreation facilities open space, and trails and the community’s of life. Th e future of Monticello, to a degree, will be determined by its ability to attract new residents. People will view Monticello and assess what it has to off er compared to other area com- munities. Maintaining and enhancing an already strong park system is one measure that can be taken to ensure Monticello’s reputation as an attractive place to live. Th e process of preparing the Comprehensive Plan did not seek to duplicate previous eff orts of the City in park planning. Rather, the Comprehensive Plan builds a strong link between community development and the provi- sion of parks and recreation facilities. 5Parks Chapter Contents Park Standards ............................5-2 Current Park System ...................5-2 Comprehensive Plan Initiatives 5-5 Neighborhood Parks ...............5-5 Community Parks ....................5-7 Community Greenway ............5-9 Trails ........................................5-11 Park Dedication.........................5-11 5-2 | Parks City of Monticello Park Standards Parks and trails are classifi ed according to their use and function. Th e information below is a summary of typical park characteristics: classifi cations, park sizes, and service areas. Th is section is intended to act as a general guide to park planning, acquisition and use. Th e standards are designed to assure that Monticello residents have convenient access to neighborhood parks and that the community has a range of active and passive recreation facilities to meet current and future needs. Mini-Park Use : Specialized park that serves a concentrated population (i.e. tots or seniors) or geographic area. Used in areas where geographic barriers prevent access to a neighborhood park. Service Area : Less than ¼ mile radius Size : 0.5 to 2 acres Location : Typically near higher density housing that does not have access to a neighborhood park or as a supplement to a neighborhood park. Neighborhood Park Use : Basic unit of the park system, developed for both active & passive activities. Design criteria should anticipate the changing demographic pro- fi les of the neighborhood served, as to provide appropriate facilities. Focus on informal and un- structured activities. Service Area : 1/3 mile radius Size : 4-10 acres Location : Easily accessible to the neighborhood population with safe walking and biking access uti- lizing trail networks. Parking facilities limited to a minimum. Site should have well-drained soils and not include topography of excessively steep slops. Community Park Use : Area designed for community scale recreation either active (athletic fi elds, etc),. passive (picnic facilities, nature study, etc.) or a combination of both. Service Area : Community wide Size : 20-65 acres Location : Site should be suited for community use, be easily accessible to the population it is intended to serve. Located near high traffi c areas such as schools and major thoroughfares. School Park Use : Depending on circumstances, combining parks with school sites can fulfi ll the space requirements of other classes of parks, such as neighborhood, community, athletic complex and special use. Service Area : Driven by the location of the school property. Size : Variable - depends on function. Location : Land should typically be suited for ac- tive recreation use, but may also include natural areas. Linear Park/Greenway Use : Trails incorporating ROW widening and land acquisition long rivers and natural areas. Service Area : Community wide Size : Varies Location : Along major river corridors, sensitive areas and exiting roadways. Incorporate multi-use and multi-modal trails. Current Park System Planning for the future begins with an understanding of the park system in 2007. Monticello’s park system currently includes 23 parks totalling approximately 108 acres. Th e location of each park is shown in the map in Figure 4-1. Th e section that follows summaries the basic characteristics of each park. 4th Street Park Shelter Rest rooms Ball diamond Tot lot Skating facilities (with lighting) - recreational skating and 2 hockey rinks Off -street parking Balboul Park Play facilities Parks | 5-32008 Comprehensive Plan 10 10 2 5 14 11 43 50 68 5 81 94 25 75 18 37 117 39 1 3 1 10 6 00 . 5 1 0. 2 5 Mi l e s Ju l y 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 Da t a S o u r c e : M n D N R , S h e r b u r n e C o u n t y , W r i g h t Co u n t y , a n d W S B & A s s o c i a t e s . Figure 4-1 - Existing Park and Trail System Ex i s t i n g P a r k a n d Re c r e a t i o n S y s t e m 1 4 t h S t r e e t P a r k 2 B a l b o u l P a r k P o n d s 3 C a r d i n a l H i l l s P a r k 4 C a r d i n a l H i l l s T o t L o t P a r k 5 C o u n t r y C l u b M a n o r 6 E a s t B r i d g e P a r k 7 E l l i s o n P a r k 8 F r e e w a y F i e l d s P a r k 9 F r o n t S t r e e t P a r k 10 G r o v e l a n d P a r k 11 H i l l c r e s t P a r k 12 M e a d o w O a k s P a r k 13 M e a d o w s P a r k & P o n d s 14 M i s s i s s i p p i D r i v e P a r k 15 M o n t i c e l l o C i t y B a l l f i e l d s 16 M o n t i s s i p p i C o u n t y P a r k 17 O a k R i d g e P a r k 18 O t t e r C r e e k P a r k 19 P a r W e s t P a r k 20 P a r k s i d e P a r k 21 P i o n e e r P a r k 22 P r a i r i e W e s t P a r k 23 R i v e r M i l l P a r k 24 R o l l i n g W o o d s P a r k 25 W e s t B r i d g e P a r k 26 E a s t v i e w E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 27 L i t t l e M o u n t a i n E l e m e n t a r y 28 P i n e w o o d E a s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 29 M o n t i c e l l o M i d d l e S c h o o l 30 M o n t i c e l l o H i g h S c h o o l 31 M o n t i c e l l o C o m m u n i t y C e n t e r & C i t y H a l l 32 M o n t e C l u b H i l l 5-4 | Parks City of Monticello Picnic facilities Natural area/open space Battle Rapids Park Natural area/open space Cardinal Hills Park Volleyball courts Picnic area Cardinal Hills Park Tot Lot Tot lot play area City/Xcel Ballfi elds Lighted softball fi elds (4) Bleachers Shelters Restroom Concession stand Country Club Manor Playground Ball fi eld Volleyball Picnic tables East/West Bridge Park Play lot Gazebo Picnic facilities Skating rink Warming house with rest rooms Sliding hill Off -street parking Ellison Park Shelter Rest room facilities Creative play area Tot recreational equipment Swings for the handicapped Parking Boat launch Fallon Park Open space Freeway Fields Soccer/football fi eld Basketball court Little league ball fi eld Softball fi eld Groveland Park Youth football fi elds Softball diamond Play area Shelters Parking Hillcrest Park Skating facilities Play lot Picnic facilities Ball fi eld Meadow Oak Park Picnic tables Nature trail Basketball court Meadows Natural area/open space Mississippi Drive Natural area/open space Scenic river overlook Swan viewing Oak Ridge Park Open space Gazebo Flower park Otter Creek Park Gazebo Natural area/open space Par West Park Playground Disc golf area (3 hole) Basketball court Picnic tables Pioneer Park (Lions Park) Play area Community building with rest rooms Picnic area with shelters Parks | 5-52008 Comprehensive Plan Off -street parking Nature trails River Mill Park Playground Lighted sliding hill Ball fi eld Shelters Basketball court Volleyball court Soccer fi eld Rolling Woods Playground area Basketball court Sunset Ponds Park Ball fi eld Soccer/football fi eld Comprehensive Plan Initiatives Th e process of preparing the Comprehensive Plan identifi ed a variety of initiatives related to the future park system in Monticello. Th ese initiatives should be considered by the Park Commission in its planning eff orts. Neighborhood Parks Th e map in Figure 4-2 illustrates the areas served by the existing park system. Each circle on this map represents an approximate one-third mile radius. Th is map sug- gests that there are no critical gaps in the distribution of city parks. All neighborhoods have reasonable access to some form of park. Th e Comprehensive Plan does not show individual neighborhood parks in areas guided for new residential development. Instead, it is assumed that neighborhood parks will be added as property is platted. Th e following policies will guide City actions in the de- velopment and maintenance of neighborhood parks. Neighborhood parks are essential elements of 1. Monticello neighborhoods. Neighborhood parks are intended to be two to six acres in size. 5-6 | Parks City of Monticello Th e Comprehensive Plan seeks a service area of 2. one mile or less for a neighborhood park. Th is service area must account for barriers created by natural and man-made features. Th e goal is to have a neighborhood park within walking or biking distance of every home. Th ere is a clear nexus between development and 3. the need for additional parks. Th e City will use the park dedication powers convey by State Law to acquire land (or cash) to implement this Plan. Th e City will require the dedication of desirable locations for parks in all new subdivisions, unless the subdivision is adequately served by an existing (or planned) neighborhood park. Land received by the City through park dedication must have the capacity for park use. Dedicated land should not be encumbered by steep slopes, poor soils, utility 2 5 14 68 9 4 18 17 39 106 Figure 4-2: Existing Park Service Areas Parks | 5-72008 Comprehensive Plan easements and other impediments to intended park uses. Parks should be connected by trails and sidewalks 4. to provide walking and biking access for both neigh- borhoods and the broader community. Th e development, improvement and maintenance 5. of the park system requires careful financial planning. With park dedication providing a key resource, this planning must be tied to ongoing projections of future growth. Th is planning should work to ensure that funding plans for the acquisi- tion and development of the regional park do not deplete funding for the rest of the system. Timely development of neighborhood parks is es-6. sential. Funding of the park system should provide for both acquisition and timely development of neighborhood parks. Th is objective may require new fi nancial strategies. Finance tools such as special assessments and housing improvement areas would allow a park to be built at the outset of residential construction. Planning for neighborhood parks should also con-7. sider the needs of rural residential subdivisions. A less dense development pattern does not remove the need for neighborhood parks, but may alter the service area and location. Community Parks Th e acquisition and development of YMCA Camp Manitou is the sole new community park initiative pro- posed in this update of the Comprehensive Plan. Th e illustration in Figure 4-3 shows a preliminary concept for the development of this regional park. This initiative meets a wide range of community needs. Acquisition of this property protects and preserves critical natural areas. As Monticello grows, it is important to preserve these areas for future gen- erations. Th e recent and future growth of Monticello creates the need for more community recreation facilities. Th e regional park provides the space to meet these needs. Th e park provides a wide range of amenities that will attract new development to Monticello. Th e 5-8 | Parks City of Monticello Active Park Use (26 acres) Environmental Learning Center Horseback Riding Stable Parking Lot Passive Park Use (11 acres) Dog Park Parking Lot Passive Park Use (32 acres) Frisbee Golf Course Archery Range Passive Park Use (11 acres) Primitive Camping Passive Use (40 acres) Nursery Passive Use (40 acres) Arboretum Picnic Grounds BERTRAM 102 acres LONG 88 acres MUD 27 acres FIRST 15 acres 1/ 8 t h m i l e s e w a g e t r e a t m e n t b u f f e r Pi p e l i n e E a s e m e n t P o s s i b l e S c h o o l B l v d . A l i g n # 1 Po s s i b l e S c h o o l B l v d . A l i g n # 2 Active Park Use (65 acres) Phase I:a) Parking lot for approximatly 100 vehicles b) 4 Softball fields 300’ base pads c) 5 International size soccer fields 100 - 120 yds x 70-80 yds Phase II:a) Parking lot expansion b) 4 Softball fields 300’ base pads c) 3 International size soccer fields 100 - 120 yds x 70-80 yds Active Park Use (53 acres) Campground / R.V. Park Boat / Canoe Launches Swimming Beach Picinic Grounds Rental Chalet Cabin Camping Playground Fishing Pier Amphitheatre ENTRANCE EN T R A N C E E N T R A N C E 1 2 3 0.5 mile loop 1.0 mile loop Long Lake Overlook Mud Lake Overlook 4.5 mile loop (all 4 lakes) First Lake Overlook OTTER C R E E K Otter Creek Overlook Wetland Overlook WETLAND COMPLEX Long Lake Overlook #3 Long Lake Overlook #2 4.5 mile loop (all 4 lakes) Ridgeline Overlook 0.5 mile to overlook 1/8th mile sewage treatment buffer 0.75 mile loop Canoe Routes Canoe Route Adjacent Use: Low Density Residential and Golf Course Adjacent Use: Low Density Residential Adjacent Use: Low Density Residential Adjacent Use: Low Density Residential Adjacent Use: Low Density Residential Adjacent Use: Commercial Nursery April 10, 2006 Adjacent Use: Industrial Figure 4-3: Concept for Development of Regional Park Parks | 5-92008 Comprehensive Plan park brings community-scale assets that benefi ts new development and enhances the quality of life across the community. Th ese amenities create the setting that should be a catalyst for the quality of neighborhood and housing stock desired by the City. Th ese factors help to create the nexus between de- velopment and this regional park initiative. Th e City anticipates using a portion of monies received from payments in lieu of park land dedication to pay for the acquisition and improvement of the regional park. Th e Park Plan identifi es two types of parks designed to meet the needs of the broader community. Th e Land Use chapter describes how the park will relate to adjacent development and connected to the broader community. Community Greenway Th e Parks chapter reinforces the concept of a greenway introduced in Land Use. As Monticello continues to grow to the west and south, it has the opportunity to establish a community greenway. Monticello has a his- tory of protecting natural features as growth occurs. A greenway builds on this commitment to create a con- nected system of natural areas that ring the community. Th e intent of this initiative is: Th e corridors are a tool for preserving important el- ements of the natural environment in Monticello. Th e corridors provide public access and use to these areas. Th e corridors connect community parks. Greenway corridors become part of the defi ning characteristics and identity of Monticello. Th e corridors provide routes for the trail system and a means of linking parks, community facilities and neighborhoods. Th ese areas provide habitat for wildlife. Th e map in Figure 4-4 shows a potential layout of a community greenway system. Th is illustration is not intended to show a specifi c plan, but rather the critical elements of a community greenway. Th ese elements include: 5-10 | Parks City of Monticello 10 11144 11 44433 5550 666888 5 8881 999 444 75 3999 10 0 0.5 1 0.25 Miles MaMM rch 13, 2008 Datatt Souruu ce: MnDNR, Sherbr uruu ne Countytt , WrWW ighthh Countytt , andnn WSB & Associcc ates. Figure 4-4: Potential Elements of Community Greenway 06 1 3 1 2 5 333333333333333333333 777777 1117 7 18 2255 Le g e n d P o t e n t i a l g r e e n w a y c o r r i d o r K e y p a r k c o n n e c t i o n s Parks | 5-112008 Comprehensive Plan Linking park and open space destinations such as Montissippi County Park, Mississippi River, larger City parks (Ellison, Pioneer and West/East Bridge), Downtown, YMCA property, and Pelican Lake. Preserving and providing public use of key areas of trees, wetlands and other natural features as part of future development. Using powerline corridors, trails and bike lanes to fi ll in gaps where it is not possible to have natural areas in the greenway. A key next step in this initiative is to conduct a Natural Resources Inventory (NRI). A NRI determines the type, quality and location of natural features in Monticello and the orderly annexation area. Th e NRI can be used to identify key property to acquire for the greenway. It will also be useful in identifying potential gaps in the greenway that must be bridged with some other form of public space. Trails A system of trails is an essential part of the Compre- hensive Plan. Trails build connections, allowing people to move through the community without a car. Trails provide the means for using area wide parks and other natural areas. Trails off er recreational opportunities for Monticello residents. For the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, continued planning and development of the trail system should be guided by the following objectives: Trails must be viewed as a system. Individual seg- ments must combine into a network that connects places within the community. Th ese connections facilitate the movement envisioned by the trail plan. Trail development should be incorporated with street construction. Th e construction and im- provement of streets provides an excellent oppor- tunity to build new segments of the trail system. Where possible, the trail should be detached and separate from the roadway. Integrate trails into new subdivisions. Focusing on trails at the platting and site planning stage of development allows for routes that serve the neighborhood and link with other elements of the trail system. Park Dedication Th e use of park dedication is essential to achieving the City’s plans and goals for parks, trails and open space. In fact, it would be diffi cult for the City to acquire and create the park system envisioned by the Comprehen- sive Plan without park dedication. Th e experience of Monticello and other cities clearly demonstrates a nexus between the development of land and the need for the municipal park system. Th e development of land for residential purposes increases the demands for parks, trails and recreational facilities in Monticello. Th e development of land also creates opportunities to preserve open space and natural re- sources. Th e Comprehensive Plan establishes a system of neigh- borhood and community oriented facilities. Monies received from payments in lieu of dedication shall be used pursuant to the park plan to meet the needs of the park system. Th e demands on the park system from new development are not tied to physical proximity of a subdivision making dedication. New residents may also be served by the development of parks and trails and the preservation of open space in other parts of Monticello. Th e overall plan for the park system seeks to provide ev- ery resident with reasonable access to the park system. In implementing the Comprehensive Plan, the City will work to distribute neighborhood parks throughout the community. Community parks and recreational facilities will be developed at locations appropriate for the function of each park. Park dedication allows the fl exibility to: Acquire land suitable for parks in both location and character. Acquire land for trails that connect neighbor- hoods with the park system and other community destinations. Acquire and preserve natural resources areas and to connect these areas into a community greenway. 5-12 | Parks City of Monticello Accept cash payments in lieu of dedication where land from a subdivision does not meet the park development needs and plans of the City. Each proposed plat should be carefully reviewed to determine if the subdivision contains land that should be dedicated to implement the park plan. If the dedi- cation of land does not satisfy the requirements of the park dedication ordinance, then the City should receive a cash payment in lieu of dedication. State Law (Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.358, Sub- division 2b) authorizes the City to require the dedica- tion of land for the purposes of this plan as part of the subdivision and platting of land. Th e City has adopted an ordinance that establishes regulations for the use of park dedication. Th is ordinance should be reviewed from time-to-time to ensure consistency with State Law and the Comprehensive Plan. Exhibit 7E MONTICELLO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Proposed Amendment Language Chapter 5, Parks The Monticello Parks and Pathways Plan identifies the City’s objectives for Parks and Pathways planning and development, building on the existing parks infrastructure, and in the context of the City’s participation in the acquisition and development of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park on former YMCA property with Wright County. The intent of the Plan is to ensure that the continued development of the parks system will provide convenient and quality recreation facilities, ease of access to the parks and pathways system, and promote continuity internally as well as outward to other providers of recreation facilities and programs. The Plan and its recommendations can be found as an appendix to this Comprehensive Plan, and consists of the following components: Introduction and background material Inventory of existing parks facilities, and summary of public comment and input Organized system of objectives and policies for park development Plan concepts and layouts for conversion of existing facilities as well as the location and development of future parks and pathways. Recommendations for implementation of the system, including operational policies, funding sources, and park dedication approaches. The 2011 Parks and Pathways System Plan is an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and is incorporated as a separate document. Resolution No. 2011-__, adopted _______, 2011. Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 1 8. Public Hearing - Consideration of an Amendment to the Official Monticello Zoning Map Applicant: City of Monticello (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission is asked to recommend adoption of an amended 2011 City of Monticello Zoning Map. Since City approval of the 2011 Official Zoning Map, which coincided with the adoption of the new Zoning Ordinance in January, staff has found that amendments to the map are necessary for a variety reasons. First, there are two annexed properties which need to be illustrated on the map. These two parcels are on the east side of the community and were previously associated with the plats of Hidden Forest and Niagara Falls. Phase 1 of Hidden Forest was never rezoned beyond A-O (although it was preliminarily platted with R-1 lot configurations) and Phase II of Hidden Forest was rezoned by Council action on 6/12/06. Niagara Falls was rezoned by Council action on 5/22/06. Both properties’ plat approvals have since lapsed. As they are part of the municipal boundary and had related official actions of rezoning, both need to be reflected properly on the Official Zoning Map. Secondly, there is one location within the CCD where the zoning designation is incorrectly shown. This parcel, located at the northeast corner of Locust and Third Street, is shown on the current zoning map as CCD with a CCD-R overlay. Although the City adopted a CCD-R overlay ordinance in 2010, it denied the rezoning of this parcel to include a CCD-R overlay. The proposed map illustrates the removal of the overlay. In addition to the needed amendments noted above, the proposed zoning map illustrates the final configuration of the Special Use Overlay district, which relates to the Adult Use Ordinance amendments. When the ordinance text amendments were made, the map amendments were also approved. The map included with this report now illustrates the overlay as approved. The amended map also includes a re-organized legend, which provides greater ease-of-use. Staff did work with consultant MFRA to try to further differentiate colors for the zoning districts. In particular, the residential districts can be somewhat difficult to discern. However, the scale of color gradient for the given shades (yellow for residential, red for commercial, purple for industrial) did not lend itself well to additional colors. Instead, outlines are used to define separate residential districts. On a final note, should Planning Commission recommend approval of the Quarry Church’s request for rezoning, Planning Commission may then wish to recommend approval of the proposed amended map subject to inclusion of that rezoning, pending final Council approval. Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 2 Planning Commission should note that Monticello’s zoning code indicates that the Official Zoning Map controls the actual zoning designation of a property, and as such, the City Attorney recommends adopting an updated map consistent with previous official action. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to recommend Ordinance #531, an Amendment to the Official Monticello Zoning Map, subject to illustration of the rezoning of Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 to B-2, and pending final Council approval. 2. Motion to recommend Ordinance #531, an Amendment to the Official Monticello Zoning Map as presented. 2. Motion to deny an Amendment to the Official Monticello Zoning Map. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1, pending recommendation for approval of the Quarry Church rezoning request by the Planning Commission and final action by the City Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Ordinance #531 B. Monticello Official Zoning Map, current C. Monticello Official Zoning Map, proposed ORDINANCE NO. 531 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The zoning map attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A” is adopted as the Official Zoning Map under Title 10, Section 3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit “A” for the City of Monticello. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED by the Monticello City Council this ___ day of ____________, 20__. CITY OF MONTICELLO By: Clint Herbst, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator EXHIBIT “A” (Attach Final Zoning Map) Cou nty Hwy 75 Chelsea Rd State Hwy 25 85th St NE 9 0 t h S t N E Linn St Pine St 7th St Sc h o o l B l v d Riverview Dr Cedar St W River St M a r v i n R d Jason Ave Dundas Rd W Broadway St Hart Blvd Country La Haug Ave NE Elm St W 4th St Fenning Ave NE Oakwook Dr Mall a rd La 95th St NE Fallon Ave NE Edmonson Ave NE Mississippi Dr 5th St C o u ntry C lu b R d Sandberg Rd P e l i c a n L a Fa lc o n D r Fenning Ave Walnut St Oak Ridge Dr Oriole La Club View Rd Broad way St Hillcrest Rd E River St Headman La M i l l Tr a i l L a Falcon Ave NE Wright St Benton St Elwood Rd Ramsey St 6th St River Mill Dr Wildwood Way Hilltop Dr Mi l l R u n R d Oak View La Farmstead Ave Ma r t i n D r 4th St E3rd St E Red Rock La Gillard Ave NE Maple St Fallon Dr Willow St View La E Grey Stone Ave Marvin Elwood Rd Fieldcrest Cir Fairway Dr Jason Ave NE Vine St Meadow La Jerry Liefert Dr Praire Rd Starling Dr Palm St Unknown or No Streetname Fallon Ave Golf Course Rd Falcon Ave Ke v i n L o n g l e y D r Craig La R e d O a k L a Front St 5th St W Thomas Park Dr Locust St M o c k i n g b i r d L a W 3rd St Eastwood Cir Briar Oaks Blvd F a r m s t e a d D r Henipin St E i d e r L a Dayton St Oak La River Forest Dr Meadow Oak Ave Kampa Cir O a k R i d g e C i r M i l l Ct River Ridge La Garrison AveOakview Ct Dundas Cir Kenneth La Otter Creek Rd Minnesota St Eagle Cir Crocus La M eado w O ak La Stone Ridge Dr Chestnut St 1 2 0 t h S t N E D arro w Ave N E Diamond Dr Pebble Brook Dr Widgeon La Washington St Bunker Cir H o m estead D r Thomas Cir E n d i c o t t T r Center Cir Oak View Cir Sandtrap Cir Country Cir Cheyen Ct O ld T e rrit o ral R d Tanager Cir Hillcrest Cir Osprey Ct A corn Cir Balboul Cir S w a ll o w C i r R i v e r s i d e C i r Meadow Oak Ct Matthew Cir E Oak Dr S t o n e R i d g e C i r Oakwood Dr Meadow Oak Ave NECounty H w y 75 Hart Blvd Marvin Rd Marvin Rd Wright St 90th St NE Cedar St Minnesota St $J U Z P G . P O U J D F M M P 0G G J D J B M ; P O J O H . B Q .J T T J T T J Q Q J 8 J M E 4 D F O J D 3 F D 0 W F S M B Z % J T U S J D U 07 & 3 - " : % * 4 5 3 * $ 5 4 1F S G P S N B O D F # B T F E 0 W F S M B Z % J T U S J D U !!! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! 4I P S F M B O E % J T U S J D U 05 ) & 3 8B U F S -F H F O E " 0 3 " 3 5 / 3 3 1 6 % 3 . ) BA S E Z O N I N G D I S T R I C T S Re s i d e n t i a l D i s t r i c t s -- L o w R e s i d e n t i a l D e n s i t i e s -- M e d i u m R e s i d e n t i a l D e n s i t i e s -- H i g h R e s i d e n t i a l D e n s i t i e s # # # # $$ % *# $ * * Bu s i n e s s D i s t r i c t s In d u s t r i a l D i s t r i c t s 4Q F D J B M 6 T F 0 W F S M B Z % J T U S J D U !!! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 9. Consideration of a Final State PUD for Landmark Center (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On June 11 `i', 2007, the City Council approved an amendment to conditional use permit for development stage Planned Unit Development for Landmark Center, a retail complex within the Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition. The CUP for PUD has been extended each year since the original approval. At this time, the developer, Mielke Bros. LLC, is preparing to move forward with development of the site. In working with tenants for the building, the developer has indicated that there is a need for adjustments to the originally approved site plan and building elevation plan. As the project has not yet been constructed, the applicant brought forward final stage site and architectural drawings for review by the Community Development Department, consistent with the Final Stage PUD ordinance. Staff believed that the changes were of significance and requested that the applicant appear before the Planning Commission for Final Stage PUD review. If in reviewing the proposed plans, the Commission believes that such changes warrant a hearing for amendment to the CUP for development stage PUD, a motion has been provided for such process. Site Plan The proposed site plan would accommodate the removal of the drive through along the east side of the building, as well as a slightly larger building. The site plan provided illustrates both revisions. A detailed analysis of other site plan impacts is provided below. The applicant has indicated that any changes to the site's storm water pollution prevention plan, grading and drainage, or utility plans are to accommodate the larger building footprint. Therefore, any conditions assigned to those plans under the original approval are still applicable and may be subject to additional comment by the City Engineer. The applicant is proposing no changes to the lighting, landscaping or overall signage plan, therefore any originally assigned conditions related to those plans are applicable. Parking The original approval was for a building totaling 9.590 square feet in area. The total square footage of the building as proposed is now 10,300 square feet, as addition of 710 square feet. Under the previous PUD approval, 59 parking stalls were provided. The PUD included a cross -easement agreement requirement for both parking and access to accommodate shared parking throughout the PUD. Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 The revised plan now illustrates 56 spaces, a net loss of 3 spaces to the PUD. However, despite the additional square footage, the parking required for this specific site actually comes closer to meeting code requirements as opposed to the shortage under the original plan. This is due to the users proposed under this final stage plan, The retail automotive user has a large area devoted to warehouse space, which reduces the parking requirement for the site. However, the cross -easement for parking and access must remain in place to accommodate potential future changes in use for the tenants within the buildings. Access & Circulation/Off Street -Loading As noted above, a cross -easement for access was required as a condition of the previous PUD approval and continues forward as a requirement under the Final Stage PUD. Access to the site continues to be provided through two existing curb cuts at Cedar Street. However, in the revised site plan, one of the two previously approved drive-throughs has been removed. Previously, a 16.24' one-way drive aisle was shown directly adjacent to a 12' drive-thru lane on the east side of the property, paralleling Cedar Street. The new site plan, accommodating the slightly larger building, now includes a dedicated off-street loading area for semi -trailer traffic and accommodates a drive aisle for the parking located along the east side of the property. The off-street loading and drive -aisle is 27.45' in width at the north entrance to the one-way aisle, narrowing to 17.71 at the south. The drive-through shown along the north side of the property remains unchanged in width, at 12'. With the revised plan, the applicant is requested to provide turning templates for truck traffic entering and exiting this area, as well as a pavement striping/painting plan for the one-way areas. It should be noted that there are additional screening requirements for off-street loading areas in commercial districts beyond the previously approved landscaping plan. However, off- street loading was not specifically addressed in the previous report and no mention of screening beyond the approved landscaping plan was required with the original PUD. The off-street loading area parallels Cedar Street and under the approved landscaping plan is proposed to include a mix of ornamental trees and shrubs. The applicant will be required to clarify the duration and volume of expected semi -trailer traffic utilizing this loading area. As a condition of approval, no semi -trailers will be allowed to remain on-site for longer than a 24 hour period, consistent with regulations for the temporary nature off-street loading.. With the addition of clarification on the intensity of off-street loading activities, staff believes that the elimination of the drive-through on the east side of the property is an improvement to the original PUD. Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 Building Elevations The applicant is proposing revisions to the previously approved building elevations. The changes include a curved roofline on the south and east facades of the building. Material finishes for the building remain consistent with the original approval. The building will be constructed mainly of EIFS block with masonry wall base and pre -finished metal coping. The revised plans do represent color variation from the original approval. Lighting The applicant has proposed the addition of an architectural light bar along the tenant space located on the south and east facades of the building. The code does make an allowance for architectural lighting elements, but requires that they be low-level illumination, not exceeding 60 watts or 100 lumens. A specific fixture detail will be required for this change at building permit and any change to the approved photometric plan will also require revision. As an additional note, all commercial properties are required to shut off lighting within one hour of business close. If approved, this item will be placed on the consent agenda of the City Council. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to approve the Final Stage PUD for Landmark Center, a portion of Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition, subject to all original conditions of the 6/11/07 approval, and those conditions listed in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to require the applicant to apply for an amendment to CUP for development stage PUD for Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 above. With comments as noted, staff believes the changes presented are generally consistent with the nature and scope of the original PUD. Staff recommends approval of the Final Stage PUD subject to the conditions noted and those directed by the Planning Commission. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 A. Revised Site Plan a. Site Plan/Certificate of Survey b. Grading, Drainage & Erosion c. Utilities d. SWWPP e. Detail B. Revised Building Elevations a. Colored Elevations, East & North b. Colored Elevations, South & West c. Building Materials, Signage C. Approved Plans 6/11/07 a. Site Plan b. Building Elevations c. Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control d. Utility Plan e. SWPPP f. Lighting g. Landscaping h. Signage D. Staff Report, City Council Agenda, 6/11/07 E. City Council Minutes, 6/11/07 F. Development and Final Stage PUD Ordinance Z. Conditions of Approval 4 Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Final Stage PUD Landmark Center — Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition The applicant clarify the intensity of off-street loading activities to the satisfaction of the City. 2. No semi -trailers will be allowed to remain on-site for longer than a 24 hour period, consistent with regulations for the temporary nature off-street loading. 3. The applicant is to provide turning templates for truck traffic entering and exiting the site with building permit. 4. The applicant is to supply a pavement striping/painting plan for the one-way areas with building permit. 5. A cross -easement for parking and access must remain in place to accommodate potential future changes in use for the tenants within the buildings. 6. Specific lighting fixture detail will be required for all architectural lighting elements, which must not exceeding 60 watts or 100 lumens. 7. Compliance with the comments by the City Engineer on the Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control, Utility and SWPPP Plans. 8. All conditions assigned under the June 1 lth, 2007 approval shall be applicable. N:\Land Projects\11103 - Landmark Center\dwg\Site Plan\11103-Cl-COS & Site Plan.dwg, 5/27/2011 1:52:11 PM EXISTING CONCRETE / ' CURB & GUTTER -- / / O Q 1 d m� 10 4.,6, N ;'00po p" O #' UT RTF I 1 1 PROPOSED ; MONUMENT SIGN - d ° d a "X" ON / ---CONCRETE AT LOT a COR. ` P a STOP SIGN TO BE RE -LOCATED �a (5' SOUTHWEST) % DRAINAGE & ---~�~-- UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) Ad ` q i t 0 20 40 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 IRON MONUMENT SET • IRON MONUMENT FOUND X CHISELED X IN CONCRETE A P. K. NAIL SET EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE EEL= PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACE EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACE Legal Description: Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center Second Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. Notes: —Existing and proposed topography, utilities, and features can be found on Sheets C1.2—C1.4. Proposed Impervious Area: Lot Area = 42,268 s.f. Impervious Area = 39,087 s.f. (92.57.) Zoning: B-3 (Highway Business) Parkina: Required parking: Jimmy Johns (approx): 28 spaces Office space: (1500 sq. ft.) = 3 spaces + 1 per 300 sq. ft. = 8 spaces NAPA: Warehouse/storage (4000 sq. ft) 1 per 500 sq. ft. = 8 spaces Retail (2500 sq. ft.) 1 per 200 sq. ft. = 13 spaces Total Required: 57 spaces Total Proposed: 56 spaces (including 3 Handicap Accessible) ARCHITECH: ENGINEER: Studio 22 Design Group, LLC 5030 Pennine Pass Columbia Heights, MN 55421 (612) 869 0467 USAQUATICS 124 BRIDGE AVE. E. P.O. BOX 86 DELANO, MN 55328 763-972-5897 I hereby cert' y that this survey, plan, or repo wa prepared by me or under m ec pervision and that I am a t&ta L Surveyor under the laws a of Minnesota. Trace C. McCoy License No. 44531 LAND SURVEYOR: '\ LANA SERVICES 1111 Highway 25 North �'��l Buffalo, MN 55313 Ph. 763.682.1781 www.meyerrohlin.com MRLS PROJECT NO. 11103 PREPARED FOR Pointmark Construction 2560 Byrd Ave N Golden Valley, MN 763 843 5651 ISSUE RECORD: 05/27/11: REVIEW SET PROJECT NUMBER DATE 05/27/11 PROJECT MANAGER E. MUNT DRAWN BY AAN CHECKED BY TCM *This document may not be used or copied without prior written consent * Errors may occur in the transmission of electronic files. Studio22 is not responsible for any claims, damages or expenses arising out of unauthorized use of information contained in electronic files. * Electronic files may not accurately reflect the final as built conditions. It is the responsibility of the user to verify layouts, dimensions and related information. PROJECT NAME LANDMARK CENTER LOCATION MONTICELLO, MN SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN / CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY SHEET NUMBER C1.1 I LEGEND polo 1000 0 i x BC 51.8 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES STORM SEWER (PROPOSED) STORM MANHOLE (PROPOSED) CATCH BASIN (PROPOSED) STORM SEWER (EXISTING) CATCH BASIN (EXISTING) PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE LOT LINE SPOT ELEVATION (PROPOSED) BC - BACK OF CURB G - GROUND ELEV. FOS - FACE OF SIDEWALK BIT - BITUMINOUS CONC - CONCRETE PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACE PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACE EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE BG 12 CONCRETE CURB * GUTTER SEE PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS TO BACK OF CURB 3"R 1/2"R 6" SLOPE 3/4" PER FOOT 8. 3R 13 112" a. 1) CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES, PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLANS. 2) CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITY LOCATION 454-0002 OR 1-800-25 1-1 1 GG WITHIN 24 HR. PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 3) ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" 4) CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR AND OBTAIN THE GENERAL STORM WATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FROM THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. 5) CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL NPDES AND LOCAL WATERSHED REQUIREMENTS. G) GRADING WORK AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT TRESPASS ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO ANY CLAIMS RESULTING FROM SUCH ACTIONS. 7) IF ANY CLEARING, GRUBBING, OR TRASH REMOVAL IS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, IT SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT BID AMOUNT. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THE REMOVAL OF TREES, STUMPS, FENCING, VEGETATION, CULVERTS, AND ALL MISCELLANEOUS DEBRIS FOUND WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OFF SITE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF ALL MATERIAL PER LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. 8) ALL MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK SHALL BE NEW MATERIAL CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS, KIND, GRADE, SIZE, QUALITY, AND OTHER DETAILS SPECIFIED HEREIN ORAS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. DO NOT USE RECYCLED OR SALVAGED AGGREGATE, ASPHALTIC PAVEMENT, CRUSHED CONCRETE, OR SCRAP SHINGLES. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL REQUIRED MATERIALS. 9) RESTORE THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. REPLACE ANY CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, OR VEGETATIVE COVER DAMAGED BY THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. RESTORE DAMAGED TURF WITH SOD WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE WORK AREA SHOWN IS GENERAL AND MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED IN THE FIELD. 10) ALL STREET RESTORATION SHALL BE COMPLETED PER CITY STANDARDS. 1 1) STRAIGHT LINE SAW -CUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE SURFACING AT THE PERIMETER OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL AREAS. USE SAWS THAT PROVIDE WATER TO THE BLADE. TACK, AND MATCH ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL EARTHWORK OPERATIONS TO MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, ORDINANCES, OSHA, AND/OR STATE SAFETY GUIDELINES. EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL GRADING, SOIL CORRECTION AND BUILDING PAD PREPARATION TO SUBGRADE. EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL FOUNDATION EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL, CURB BACKFILL, SAND CUSHION, VAPOR BARRIER BELOW SAND CUSHION. EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BLACK DIRT AT LEAST G" DEEP IN ALL PLANTING AREAS, FREE OF LARGE LUMPS, STONES AND STICKS, GRADED AND READY FOR PLANTING. BLACK DIRT MAY BE TAKEN FROM ORGANIC ON SITE SOURCES, IF AVAILABLE. EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOIL TEST REPORT FOR ALL EARTHWORK. MATERIALS IMPORTED TO THE SITE SHALL MEET WITH SOIL ENGINEER'S APPROVAL AND SHALL BE CERTIFIED AS NON -CONTAMINATED. THE REQUIRED COMPACTION OF ALL PAVEMENT GRADING AND BUILDING SUBGRADE SHALL BE 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. ALL TRENCHES WITHIN PAVEMENT AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED IN MAXIMUM G" LIFTS AT 90% MODIFIED PROCTOR. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN FOR EACH 2' OF FILL FOR EVERY 2,500 S.F. OF FLOOR AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY THE OWNER WITH DOCUMENTED TEST RESULTS BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY ON UTILITY, STREET, AND FILL COMPACTION TESTS. CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES FOR EARTHWORK SHALL BE PLUS OR MINUS I /10 OF A FOOT. BITUMINOUS PAVING FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL BITUMINOUS PAVING AS CALLED FOR ON THE PLANS. FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. PRIOR TO FINE GRADING OF THE SITE, PAVING CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE PROPERTY AND VERIFY THAT THE SUBGRADE IS WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 1/10 OF A FOOT, AND THAT THE SUBGRADE CONDITION IS SUITABLE TO ACCEPT THE BASE MATERIAL RELATIVE TO SOIL COMPACTION AND MOISTURE. IF THESE CONDITIONS ARE NOT PRESENT, PAVING CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR AND NOT PROCEED UNTIL ACCEPTABLE CORRECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN. PAVING CONTRACTOR SHALL ROLL THE PARKING LOT SUBGRADE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BASE MATERIALS WITH AT LEAST THREE PASSES OF A VIBRATORY ROLLER, OR AS ADDITIONALLY NEEDED TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED SUBGRADE DENSITY. PAVING CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN GRADE OF BASE MATERIALS TO ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF ALL POINTS ON THE LOT WITHOUT FLAT SPOTS, BIRDBATHS, ETC. PRIOR TO CURBING, AGGREGATE PLACEMENT, AND BITUMINOUS PAVING, PARKING AREAS SHALL BE PROOF ROLLED WITH HEAVY RUBBER TIRED FULLY LOADED TANDEM AXLE DUMP TRUCK IN THE PRESENCE OF THE GEOTECHNICAL SCIENTIST TO ISOLATE AND CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF SOFT, LOOSE YIELDING SOILS. BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE: MNDOT 233 1, TYPE 3 1 B BITUMEN TACK COAT: CONFORM TO MNDOT 2357 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE: MNDOT 233 1, TYPE 4 1 A BITUMINOUS PAVING: G" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE (MNDOT CLASS V 100% CRUSHED ROCK OR RECYCLED CONCRETE), 1 -1 /2" BASE COURSE, 1-1 /2" WEAR COURSE. PARKING LOT STRIPING: WHITE WITH BLUE FIELD/WHITE HANDICAP MARKINGS. FINAL ROLLING SHALL BE DONE WITH A STEEL -WHEELED ROLLER CONTINUOUSLY UNTIL ALL ROLLER MARKS ARE ELIMINATED. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PROTECT ADJACENT CONCRETE FINISHES FROM DAMAGE OR SMEARING. ERECT BARRICADES TO PROTECT PAVING FROM TRAFFIC UNTIL MIXTURE HAS COOLED AND ATTAINED SUFFICIENT HARDNESS TO WITHSTAND TRAFFIC. N:\Land Projects\11103 -Landmark Center\dwg\Site Plan\11103-C2-Grading.dwg, 5/27/2011 1:53:59 PM SURMOUNTABLE CURB GUTTER C �� aG \ N 00 o 0 20 40 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SIDEWALK CURBING DETAIL 4" THICK REINFORCED CONC. SIDEWALK - SEE FOS = FACE OF SIDEWALK ARCHITECTURAL SPECS GxG W.W.F. N #5 KEBAB O �ti r G" COMPACTED GRAN. FILL NOTE: ALL C*G AND PAVING AS OCCURS SIDEWALK CURBING - SEE 51TE PLAN FOR SURROUNDING BUILDING COMPOSITION SHALL BE TIPPED -OUT ---------------- REMOVE EXISTING (-/'P,13/ X 958.48 —_ GUTTER TAPER ANIS MATCH IN TO EXISTING CORD GUTTER =_ —= ---- X 959.13\ 59' BC 58.55 \59 30 g CURB TAPER DETAIL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER BG 18 DESIGN °a a. . .a e C�Rg 3, CURB TAPER TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT ENDS OF ALL CURB AND GUTTER THAT DO NOT CONNECT TO IN PLACE CURBS. COST OF TAPER TO BE INCIDENTAL TO BG 12 DESIGN CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SAWCUT AS NEEDED BC 58.65 C g9 6 ON WEST PROPERTY / 12 i I\ 9C .62 59 -2 BC 60 C 601 -- LINE FOR INSTALLATION -------- ` Oyt — a i � BC 58.91 � ----------- OF CONCRETE ISLAND. a 5 / BC 59.96 IX 958.02 BC 59.94 6028 \\ 165) �CO E / BC 58.: / X958.19 s. PROVIDE CURB CUT FOR DRAINAGE FROM BOTH PROPERTIES. (SEE DETAIL ----X 958.26 SHEET C 1.5) BC 58.94 \ BC 58.89 BC 58.93 BC 9, X MATCH INTO NOTES: EXISTING GRADE O BG 12 CURB AND GUTTER (SEE DETAIL) 2O SURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER. (SEE DETAIL) 0 TRANSITION FROM BG 12 CURB AND GUTTER TO SURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER ® SIDEWALK CURB (SEE DETAIL) O TIP -OUT CURB © HANDICAP STALLS AND ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE AT MAX 2% SLOPE. O7 BITUMINOUS PAVING (SEE DETAIL) ® CONCRETE SIDEWALK AREAS O9 HANDICAP SIGN (SEE DETAIL) I 0 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP WITH 2'X 8' TRUNCATED DOME PANEL (PARALLEL RAMP DESIGN - SEE DETAIL) 0. . RAMP CONCRETE DOWN FLUSH WITH BITUMINOUS (SEE DETAIL) 12 WOOD BARRICADE (SEE DETAIL) 8/ rUMINo RE/WO \ OUTn SIDE C PRB T/ RpP�R�E 1 1/2" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 1 1/2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE G" CLA55 5, AGGREGATE BASE COURSE (MNDOT APPROVED CLA55 V 100% 5UBGKADE CRUSHED ROCK OR RECYCLED CONCRETE) ARCHITECH: ENGINEER: Studio 22 Design Group, LLC 5030 Pennine Pass Columbia Heights, MN 55421 (612) 869 0467 USAQUATICS 124 BRIDGE AVE. E. P.O. BOX 86 DELANO, MN 55328 763-972-5897 the y that this plan, ci tion, r report was prepared by m nd my direct supervision and th m a duly Licensed Professional gineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date Nicholas R. Nowacki License No. 45785 LAND SURVEYOR: LANG SERVI01111I a 1111 Highway 25 North Buffalo, MN 55313 Ph. 763.682.1781 www.meyerrohlin.com MRLS PROJECT NO. 11103 PREPARED FOR Pointmark Construction 2560 Byrd Ave N Golden Valley, MN 763 843 5651 ISSUE RECORD: 05/27/11: REVIEW SET PROJECT NUMBER DATE 05/27/11 PROJECT MANAGER E. MUNT DRAWN BY AAN CHECKED BY NRN *This document may not be used or copied without prior written consent * Errors may occur in the transmission of electronic files. Studio22 is not responsible for any claims, damages or expenses arising out of unauthorized use of information contained in electronic files. * Electronic files may not accurately reflect the final as built conditions. It is the responsibility of the user to verify layouts, dimensions and related information. PROJECT NAME LANDMARK CENTER LOCATION MONTICELLO, MN SHEET TITLE GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEET NUMBER C1.2 . e X. A �e: .� a,� ,n �, .. 0 A o a, a.. e e. a - GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES STORM SEWER (PROPOSED) STORM MANHOLE (PROPOSED) CATCH BASIN (PROPOSED) STORM SEWER (EXISTING) CATCH BASIN (EXISTING) PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE LOT LINE SPOT ELEVATION (PROPOSED) BC - BACK OF CURB G - GROUND ELEV. FOS - FACE OF SIDEWALK BIT - BITUMINOUS CONC - CONCRETE PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACE PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACE EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE BG 12 CONCRETE CURB * GUTTER SEE PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS TO BACK OF CURB 3"R 1/2"R 6" SLOPE 3/4" PER FOOT 8. 3R 13 112" a. 1) CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES, PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLANS. 2) CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITY LOCATION 454-0002 OR 1-800-25 1-1 1 GG WITHIN 24 HR. PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 3) ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" 4) CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR AND OBTAIN THE GENERAL STORM WATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FROM THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. 5) CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL NPDES AND LOCAL WATERSHED REQUIREMENTS. G) GRADING WORK AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT TRESPASS ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO ANY CLAIMS RESULTING FROM SUCH ACTIONS. 7) IF ANY CLEARING, GRUBBING, OR TRASH REMOVAL IS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, IT SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT BID AMOUNT. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THE REMOVAL OF TREES, STUMPS, FENCING, VEGETATION, CULVERTS, AND ALL MISCELLANEOUS DEBRIS FOUND WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OFF SITE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF ALL MATERIAL PER LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. 8) ALL MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK SHALL BE NEW MATERIAL CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS, KIND, GRADE, SIZE, QUALITY, AND OTHER DETAILS SPECIFIED HEREIN ORAS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. DO NOT USE RECYCLED OR SALVAGED AGGREGATE, ASPHALTIC PAVEMENT, CRUSHED CONCRETE, OR SCRAP SHINGLES. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL REQUIRED MATERIALS. 9) RESTORE THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. REPLACE ANY CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, OR VEGETATIVE COVER DAMAGED BY THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. RESTORE DAMAGED TURF WITH SOD WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE WORK AREA SHOWN IS GENERAL AND MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED IN THE FIELD. 10) ALL STREET RESTORATION SHALL BE COMPLETED PER CITY STANDARDS. 1 1) STRAIGHT LINE SAW -CUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE SURFACING AT THE PERIMETER OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL AREAS. USE SAWS THAT PROVIDE WATER TO THE BLADE. TACK, AND MATCH ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL EARTHWORK OPERATIONS TO MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, ORDINANCES, OSHA, AND/OR STATE SAFETY GUIDELINES. EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL GRADING, SOIL CORRECTION AND BUILDING PAD PREPARATION TO SUBGRADE. EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL FOUNDATION EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL, CURB BACKFILL, SAND CUSHION, VAPOR BARRIER BELOW SAND CUSHION. EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BLACK DIRT AT LEAST G" DEEP IN ALL PLANTING AREAS, FREE OF LARGE LUMPS, STONES AND STICKS, GRADED AND READY FOR PLANTING. BLACK DIRT MAY BE TAKEN FROM ORGANIC ON SITE SOURCES, IF AVAILABLE. EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOIL TEST REPORT FOR ALL EARTHWORK. MATERIALS IMPORTED TO THE SITE SHALL MEET WITH SOIL ENGINEER'S APPROVAL AND SHALL BE CERTIFIED AS NON -CONTAMINATED. THE REQUIRED COMPACTION OF ALL PAVEMENT GRADING AND BUILDING SUBGRADE SHALL BE 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. ALL TRENCHES WITHIN PAVEMENT AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED IN MAXIMUM G" LIFTS AT 90% MODIFIED PROCTOR. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN FOR EACH 2' OF FILL FOR EVERY 2,500 S.F. OF FLOOR AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY THE OWNER WITH DOCUMENTED TEST RESULTS BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY ON UTILITY, STREET, AND FILL COMPACTION TESTS. CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES FOR EARTHWORK SHALL BE PLUS OR MINUS I /10 OF A FOOT. BITUMINOUS PAVING FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL BITUMINOUS PAVING AS CALLED FOR ON THE PLANS. FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. PRIOR TO FINE GRADING OF THE SITE, PAVING CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE PROPERTY AND VERIFY THAT THE SUBGRADE IS WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 1/10 OF A FOOT, AND THAT THE SUBGRADE CONDITION IS SUITABLE TO ACCEPT THE BASE MATERIAL RELATIVE TO SOIL COMPACTION AND MOISTURE. IF THESE CONDITIONS ARE NOT PRESENT, PAVING CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR AND NOT PROCEED UNTIL ACCEPTABLE CORRECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN. PAVING CONTRACTOR SHALL ROLL THE PARKING LOT SUBGRADE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BASE MATERIALS WITH AT LEAST THREE PASSES OF A VIBRATORY ROLLER, OR AS ADDITIONALLY NEEDED TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED SUBGRADE DENSITY. PAVING CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN GRADE OF BASE MATERIALS TO ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF ALL POINTS ON THE LOT WITHOUT FLAT SPOTS, BIRDBATHS, ETC. PRIOR TO CURBING, AGGREGATE PLACEMENT, AND BITUMINOUS PAVING, PARKING AREAS SHALL BE PROOF ROLLED WITH HEAVY RUBBER TIRED FULLY LOADED TANDEM AXLE DUMP TRUCK IN THE PRESENCE OF THE GEOTECHNICAL SCIENTIST TO ISOLATE AND CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF SOFT, LOOSE YIELDING SOILS. BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE: MNDOT 233 1, TYPE 3 1 B BITUMEN TACK COAT: CONFORM TO MNDOT 2357 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE: MNDOT 233 1, TYPE 4 1 A BITUMINOUS PAVING: G" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE (MNDOT CLASS V 100% CRUSHED ROCK OR RECYCLED CONCRETE), 1 -1 /2" BASE COURSE, 1-1 /2" WEAR COURSE. PARKING LOT STRIPING: WHITE WITH BLUE FIELD/WHITE HANDICAP MARKINGS. FINAL ROLLING SHALL BE DONE WITH A STEEL -WHEELED ROLLER CONTINUOUSLY UNTIL ALL ROLLER MARKS ARE ELIMINATED. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PROTECT ADJACENT CONCRETE FINISHES FROM DAMAGE OR SMEARING. ERECT BARRICADES TO PROTECT PAVING FROM TRAFFIC UNTIL MIXTURE HAS COOLED AND ATTAINED SUFFICIENT HARDNESS TO WITHSTAND TRAFFIC. N:\Land Projects\11103 -Landmark Center\dwg\Site Plan\11103-C2-Grading.dwg, 5/27/2011 1:53:59 PM SURMOUNTABLE CURB GUTTER C �� aG \ N 00 o 0 20 40 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SIDEWALK CURBING DETAIL 4" THICK REINFORCED CONC. SIDEWALK - SEE FOS = FACE OF SIDEWALK ARCHITECTURAL SPECS GxG W.W.F. N #5 KEBAB O �ti r G" COMPACTED GRAN. FILL NOTE: ALL C*G AND PAVING AS OCCURS SIDEWALK CURBING - SEE 51TE PLAN FOR SURROUNDING BUILDING COMPOSITION SHALL BE TIPPED -OUT ---------------- REMOVE EXISTING (-/'P,13/ X 958.48 —_ GUTTER TAPER ANIS MATCH IN TO EXISTING CORD GUTTER =_ —= ---- X 959.13\ 59' BC 58.55 \59 30 g CURB TAPER DETAIL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER BG 18 DESIGN °a a. . .a e C�Rg 3, CURB TAPER TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT ENDS OF ALL CURB AND GUTTER THAT DO NOT CONNECT TO IN PLACE CURBS. COST OF TAPER TO BE INCIDENTAL TO BG 12 DESIGN CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SAWCUT AS NEEDED BC 58.65 C g9 6 ON WEST PROPERTY / 12 i I\ 9C .62 59 -2 BC 60 C 601 -- LINE FOR INSTALLATION -------- ` Oyt — a i � BC 58.91 � ----------- OF CONCRETE ISLAND. a 5 / BC 59.96 IX 958.02 BC 59.94 6028 \\ 165) �CO E / BC 58.: / X958.19 s. PROVIDE CURB CUT FOR DRAINAGE FROM BOTH PROPERTIES. (SEE DETAIL ----X 958.26 SHEET C 1.5) BC 58.94 \ BC 58.89 BC 58.93 BC 9, X MATCH INTO NOTES: EXISTING GRADE O BG 12 CURB AND GUTTER (SEE DETAIL) 2O SURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER. (SEE DETAIL) 0 TRANSITION FROM BG 12 CURB AND GUTTER TO SURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER ® SIDEWALK CURB (SEE DETAIL) O TIP -OUT CURB © HANDICAP STALLS AND ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE AT MAX 2% SLOPE. O7 BITUMINOUS PAVING (SEE DETAIL) ® CONCRETE SIDEWALK AREAS O9 HANDICAP SIGN (SEE DETAIL) I 0 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP WITH 2'X 8' TRUNCATED DOME PANEL (PARALLEL RAMP DESIGN - SEE DETAIL) 0. . RAMP CONCRETE DOWN FLUSH WITH BITUMINOUS (SEE DETAIL) 12 WOOD BARRICADE (SEE DETAIL) 8/ rUMINo RE/WO \ OUTn SIDE C PRB T/ RpP�R�E 1 1/2" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 1 1/2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE G" CLA55 5, AGGREGATE BASE COURSE (MNDOT APPROVED CLA55 V 100% 5UBGKADE CRUSHED ROCK OR RECYCLED CONCRETE) ARCHITECH: ENGINEER: Studio 22 Design Group, LLC 5030 Pennine Pass Columbia Heights, MN 55421 (612) 869 0467 USAQUATICS 124 BRIDGE AVE. E. P.O. BOX 86 DELANO, MN 55328 763-972-5897 the y that this plan, ci tion, r report was prepared by m nd my direct supervision and th m a duly Licensed Professional gineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date Nicholas R. Nowacki License No. 45785 LAND SURVEYOR: LANG SERVI01111I a 1111 Highway 25 North Buffalo, MN 55313 Ph. 763.682.1781 www.meyerrohlin.com MRLS PROJECT NO. 11103 PREPARED FOR Pointmark Construction 2560 Byrd Ave N Golden Valley, MN 763 843 5651 ISSUE RECORD: 05/27/11: REVIEW SET PROJECT NUMBER DATE 05/27/11 PROJECT MANAGER E. MUNT DRAWN BY AAN CHECKED BY NRN *This document may not be used or copied without prior written consent * Errors may occur in the transmission of electronic files. Studio22 is not responsible for any claims, damages or expenses arising out of unauthorized use of information contained in electronic files. * Electronic files may not accurately reflect the final as built conditions. It is the responsibility of the user to verify layouts, dimensions and related information. PROJECT NAME LANDMARK CENTER LOCATION MONTICELLO, MN SHEET TITLE GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEET NUMBER C1.2 LEGEND (PROPOSED) 10 � 10 SANITARY SEWER 1010 1010 STORM SEWER 1 WATERMAIN CLEANOUT ® CATCH BASIN GATE VALVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE ° a oo a CONCRETE SURFACE o a GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES j 0 0 (EXISTING) P SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER I WATERMAIN OHE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE TELEPHONE RISER ELECTRIC METER UNDERGROUND GAS SIGN LOT LINE BITUMINOUS SURFACE e CONCRETE SURFACE 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITY LOCATION G 12-454-0002 OR 1-800-25 1-1 1 GG WITHIN 24 HR. PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 2.POTHOLE TO VERIFY THE POSITIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AT A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF LOCATIONS IN ORDER TO ASSURE THAT NO CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED WORK EXISTS AND THAT SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 15 AVAILABLE. 3.ADJU5T ALL CURB STOPS, VALVE BOXES, MAINTENANCE HOLE CASTINGS, CATCH BASIN CASTINGS, CLEANOUT COVERS, AND SIMILAR ITEMS TO FINISHED GRADE. 4.I1\15TALL ALL PIPE WITH THE ASTM IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS ON THE TOP FOR INSPECTION. COMMENCE PIPE LAYING AT THE LOWEST POINT IN THE PROPOSED SEWER LINE. LAY THE PIPE WITH THE BELL END OR RECEIVING GROOVE END OF THE PIPE POINTING UPGRADE. WHEN CONNECTING TO AN EXISTING PIPE, UNCOVER THE EXISTING PIPE IN ORDER TO ALLOW ANY ADJUSTMENTS IN THE PROPOSED LINE AND GRADE BEFORE LAYING ANY PIPE. 5.CON5TRUCT SANITARY SEWER, WATEKMAIN, AND STORM SEWER UTILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS 2600, 2G 1 1, AND 2G21 DATED 1999, OR THE LATEST REVISED EDITION. WATER, DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 1. SEPARATION OF WATER AND SEWER: CONSTRUCT SEWER AND WATER SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 471 5. 1710, SUBPART 2. PROVIDE A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 16 INCHES AT ALL WATER LINE AND SEWER LINE CK0551NG5. 2. WATEKMAIN DEPTH: MAINTAIN 8 FEET OF COVER, OVER THE TOP OF THE WATER LINES TO THE FINISHED GRADE. VERIFY ELEVATION OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER LINES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. INSTALL THE WATER LINES AT GREATER DEPTHS IN ORDER TO CLEAR STORM SEWERS, SANITARY SEWERS, OR OTHER UTILITIES A5 REQUIRED. INCLUDE C05T5 TO LOWER WATER LINES IN THE BA5E BID. 3.Dl51NFECTION: DISINFECT ALL COMPLETED WATEKMAIN5 IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA STANDARD CG5 1. IF THE TABLET OK CONTINUOUS FEED METHODS ARE USED, DISINFECT U51NG WATER THAT CONTAINS AT LEAST 50 PPM OF AVAILABLE CHLORINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA KULE5, PART 4715.2250. RETAIN THE TREATED WATER IN THE PIPELINE FOR AT LEAST 24 HOUR5. MEASURE THE CHLORINE RESIDUAL AT THE END OF THE 24 HOUR PERIOD. THE FREE CHLORINE RESIDUAL MUST BE AT LEAST 10 MG/L MEASURED AT ANY POINT IN THE LINE. MEASUREMENT OF THE CHLORINE CONCENTRATION AT REGULAR INTERVALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD METHODS, AWWA M-1 2, OR U51NG APPROPRIATE CHLORINE TEST KITS. 4.TE5TING: PRESSURE TEST AND PERFORM BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS ON ALL WATER LINES UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. NOTIFY THE CITY AT LEAST 24 WORKING HOUR5 PRIOR TO ANY TESTING. PRESSURIZE THE WATERLINE TO 1034-Kpa (I 50-p5i) GAUGE PRESSURE (MEASURED AT THE POINT OF LOWEST ELEVATION) BY MEANS OF A PUMP CONNECTED TO THE PIPE IN A SATISFACTORY MANNER. MAINTAIN THE TEST PRESSURE FOR A MINIMUM OF 2 HOURS. DO NOT ADD WATER, TO THE WATEKMAIN IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE REQUIRED PRESSURE DURING THE WATER MAIN PRESSURE TESTING. THE TEST SECTION OF PIPE 15 ACCEPTABLE WITH A PRESSURE DROP OF 14 kPa (2 Psi) OR LE55. 5.U5E CLA55 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) WITH PUSH -ON JOINTS FOR ALL DIP WATEKMAIN. G.U5E ONLY STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS AND NUTS ON ALL WATEKMAIN FITTINGS, VALVES, AND HYDKANT5. 7.U5E MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINT DEVICES FOR JOINT RESTRAINT ON ALL WATEKMAIN BEND5 HAVING A VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL DEFLECTION OF 22-1/2 DEGREES OR GREATEN, ALL VALVES, STUBS, EXTENSIONS, TEES, CROSSES, PLUGS, ALL HYDRANT VALVES, AND ALL HYDRANTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. U5E "SERIES 1100 MEGALUG" MANUFACTURED BY EBAA IRON INC., EA5TLAND, TEXAS, OR APPROVED EQUAL, INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RESTRAINT ON DUCTILE IRON PIPE. &AT ALL VALVE LOCATIONS WHICH KEQUIKE4 A 12" OR SMALLER VALVE, INSTALL GATE VALVES WHICH ARE OF THE COMPRESSION PIE51LIENT SEATED (CRS) TYPE. U5E AMERICAN FLOW CONTROL'S SERIES 2500 DUCTILE IRON RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE, A5T A46 OR APPROVED EQUAL. GATE VALVES SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C509. INSTALL CAST IRON VALVE BOXES CONFORMING TO G8GO-G WITH NO. G BA5E, OR EQUIVALENT. VALVE BOXES SHALL HAVE AT LEAST G" OF ADJUSTMENT ABOVE AND BELOW FINISHED GRADE. DROP COVERS ON VALVE BOXES SHALL BE ROUND AND BEAR THE WORD "WATER" CAST ON THE TOP. U5E TYLER G8GO-G "5TAPUT" COVERS WITH EXTENDED SKIRT, OR EQUIVALENT. 9.1`IRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY. DO NOT CONNECT HYDRANT DRAINS TO SANITARY SEWERS OR STORM SEWERS. DO NOT LOCATE HYDKANT5 WITHIN 10 FEET OF SANITARY SEWERS OR, STORM SEWERS. WHEN PLACING FIRE HYDRANTS IN LOCATIONS WHERE THE GROUNDWATER TABLE 15 LE55 THAN 8 FEET BELOW THE GROUND SURFACE, PLUG THE HYDRANT DRAIN HOLES AND EQUIP THE HYDKANT5 WITH A TAG STATING THE NEED FOR PUMPING AFTER USE. SANITARY SEWER 1. PIPE: U5E SOLID -CORE, SCHEDULE 40, ASTM D2GG5 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PLASTIC PIPE FOR DESIGNATED PVC SANITARY SEWERS G INCHES IN DIAMETER OR, LESS. USE SOLID -CORE, ASTM D3034 PSM (POLY VINYL CHLORIDE) (PVC) PIPE FOR, DESIGNATED PVC SANITARY SEWERS 8 INCHES TO 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER. JOINTS FOR ALL SANITARY SEWER MAINS SHALL HAVE PUSH -ON JOINTS WITH ELA5TOMEKIC GASKETS. USE OF SOLVENT CEMENT JOINTS 15 ALLOWED FOR BUILDING SERVICES. SOLVENT CEMENT JOINTS IN PVC PIPE MUST INCLUDE USE OF A PRIMER WHICH 15 OF CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 471 5.0810, SUBPART 2. PIPE WITH SOLVENT CEMENT JOINTS SHALL BE JOINED WITH PVC CEMENT CONFORMING TO ASTM D25G4. INSTALL PVC PIPE ON A GRANULAR BED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D232 1. 2.CLEANOUT5: INSTALL CLEANOUT5 ON ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES PART 4715. 1010. THE DISTANCE BETWEEN CLEANOUT5 IN HORIZONTAL PIPING SHALL NOT EXCEED 150 FEET FOR PIPES 4 -INCH AND OVER IN SIZE. CLEANOUT5 SHALL BE OF THE SAME NOMINAL SIZE A5 THE PIPE5 THEY SERVE. INSTALL A METER BOX FRAME AND SOLID LID (NEENAH R- 19 14-A, OR APPROVED EQUAL) OVER ALL CLEANOUT5. 3.TE5TING: PRESSURE TEST ALL SANITARY SEWER LINES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA RULES PART 4715.2620. TEST ALL FLEXIBLE SANITARY SEWER LINES FOR DEFLECTION AFTER THE SEWER LINE HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND BACKFILL HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR AT LEAST 30 DAYS. NO PIPE SHALL EXCEED A DEFLECTION OF 5%. IF THE TEST FAILS, MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS AND RE -TEST. 4.UNLE55 OTHERWISE INDICATED, USE REINFORCED, PRECAST, CONCRETE MANHOLES CONFORMING TO ASTM C478, FURNISHED WITH PRECAST BASES. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE SUPPLIED WITH PRE -FORMED INVERTS AND FLEXIBLE NEOPRENE SLEEVE CONNECTIONS FOR ALL LATERAL LINES 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER OK LE55, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. JOINTS FOR ALL PRECAST MANHOLES SECTIONS SHALL HAVE CONFINED, RUBBER "0" -RING GASKETS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C923. THE INSIDE BARREL DIAMETER SHALL NOT BE LE55 THAN 48 INCHES. 5.U5E NEENAH FOUNDRY CO. R- I G42 CASTING WITH SELF-SEALING, SOLID, TYPE B LID, OR APPROVED EQUAL, ON ALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES. COVERS SHALL BEAR THE "SANITARY SEWER" LABEL. N:\Land Projects\11103 - Landmark Center\dwg\Site Plan\11103-0-UtilitiesAwg, 5/27/2011 1:55:02 PM PVC � HDPE PIPE BEDDING DETAIL �I 12" MIN 12" MIN 12" COMPACTED GRANULAR ENCASEMENT MATERIAL (MNDOT SPEC 3 1 49) UNDISTURBED SOIL DIP * RCP PIPE BEDDING DETAIL . \ I Do I / 6" O COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL AS PER SPECS `*'�UNDISTURBED SOIL THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH SHALL BE SHAPED TO FIT THE PIPE BARREL FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE OUTSIDE PIPE DIAMETER INSTALL CURB CUT SO WATER CAN DRAIN FROM BOTH PROPERTIES (SEE DETAIL/SHEET C1.5) --N CB -2 I RIM=958.03 INV. OUT=954.85 • EXISTING MANHOLE-,- INV.=946.75 CATCH BASIN SCHEDULE CB -1 , 48" PRECAST, NEENAH R-3007 CASTING C15-2, 2'x3' PRECAST, NEENAH K -3007-C CASTING 0 20 40 60 GRAPHIC SCALE /N FEET ------------- J*` NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXISTING INVERT ELEVATIONS. IF ANY MAJOR DISCREPANCIES EXIST, ENGINEER SHALL BE CONTACTED IMMEDIATELY 2. MAINTAIN MINIMUM 8' OF COVER OVER WATERMAIN UNLESS SPECIFIED 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR BRINGING UTILITY STUBS INTO BUILDING A DISTANCE OF 3 FEET PAST INTERIOR FACE OF WALL (COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH MECHANICAL) CONNECT TO EXISTING SAN. SEWER SERVICE W/SAMPLING MANHOLE (SEE DETAIL/SHEET C1.5) RIM=959.00 INV. I N= 952.69 INV. OUT= FIELD VERIFY & CONSTRUCT �- MANHOLE AS NECESSARY (APPROX. INV.=945.9). IF DROP IS GREATER THAN 24", USE OUTSIDE DROP. 7 r� EX. 52'-6" CIP SAN. ---- SEWER SERVICE .`' °•' (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) \ I \ a d � CLEANOUT r • '�� . . -- RIM=959.40 `. • ':A i INV=953.63 �\ \, SAN. SEWER SERVICE 8'_4" PVC--- q �• Q�G f'' STUBINV.=953.80 / �� ( ) ® 2.08% ,.;• b , �AC /,EXIST/NG I / (COORDINATE EXACT -- f�:, ;`': �5 � %/ 8' , ... DlP ...:' �/ LOCATION W/MECH.)--------------- T EPHON RISER / .' :, ►�1 , REMOVE EXISTING _U ERGR N CA L--_ PROPOSED 6"-45° STORM STUB TO CB TO BER -L;�. BUILDING ,,,-' ; -DIP BEND / LOCATION / F.F.E.=960.20 / A�: \� ., / --14 -6 DIP v APPROX INV.=955.68 ,: \\\ / l / it 1��, I ;•: \ EXTEND WATEKMAIN 1.0' PAST ! ,� /%� ,--�X. 30'-12" iv •' �� \\ INTERIOR WALL OF BUILDING. ;' -' ; i /// RCP @ 0.50% 4.: \\\ INSTALL 90° BEND & BRING ,-,, r ' ©0 HOPE \ - •' \ WATERMAIN STRAIGHT UP TO 2. \\ 1.0' ABOVE F.F.E. (961.20) i 089'%ft //,'�8-EX m \ I / o „,APPROX T T ,...;f : r r T_ r r r r r r -T-1 T INV.=955.58 T T T I / q STORM STUB IN =956.77 CB F\F RIM=958 (COORDINATE EXACT .2 a 3 _ .�� • '.:; ; INV. IN=955.73,- ,/; �:: • LOCATION W/MECH.) INV. OUT -099 A8 °ti"' -----UTILITY POLE/RISERS .i . VC G E\. EXISTING MANHOLE 0 /07 (5� INV.=946.01 STORM/SANITARY CROSSING / SANITARY TOP OF PIPE -------- =947.1 ---- =947.1 APPROX. STORM BOTTOM OF PIPE - =954.27 (APPROX.) (SEE DETAIL »A») i / / / ' G ° CONNECT TO EXISTING CB--\� / / PVC-.';`� �F d CB -EX (CORE DRILL) `�, ------ l EX/ST/ 619 f�-\ / APPROX INV. OUT(EX.)=953.22 i �/ INV. IN(PROP.)=954.47 I i INSTALL A CONCRETE / a INSTALL A CONCRETE BULKHEAD (WATER d . BULKHEAD (WATER TIGHT) AT END OF TIGHT) AT END OF UNUSED STUB OR / UNUSED STUB OR REMOVE EXISTING LINE ° REMOVE EXISTING LINE - d ` H'lF TO BE RE -LOCATED °, // / oy /// 4 // 4, EXISTING M HOLE INV.=944.9, ARCHITECH: ENGINEER: Studio 22 Design Group, LLC 5030 Pennine Pass Columbia Heights, MN 55421 (612) 869 0467 USAQUATICS 124 BRIDGE AVE. E. P.O. BOX 86 DELANO, MN 55328 763-972-5897 I hereby c ify that this plan, specifi io or report was prepared by r u r my direct supervision and h I am duly Licensed Professional r under the laws of the State of nesota. Date Nicholas R. Nowacki License No. 45785 LAND SURVEYOR: O •''�LANV SERVICES 1' /l 1111 Highway 2North Buffalo, MN 55313 Ph. 763.682.1781 www.meyerrohlin.com MRLS PROJECT NO. 11103 PREPARED FOR Pointmark Construction 2560 Byrd Ave N Golden Valley, MN 763 843 5651 ISSUE RECORD: 05/27/11: REVIEW SET PROJECT NUMBER DATE 05/27/11 PROJECT MANAGER E. MUNT DRAWN BY AAN CHECKED BY NRN *This document may not be used or copied without prior written consent * Errors may occur in the transmission of electronic files. Studio22 is not responsible for any claims, damages or expenses arising out of unauthorized use of information contained in electronic files. * Electronic files may not accurately reflect the final as built conditions. It is the responsibility of the user to verify layouts, dimensions and related information. PROJECT NAME LANDMARK CENTER LOCATION MONTICELLO, MN SHEET TITLE UTILITY PLAN SHEET NUMBER C1.3 LEGEND LOT LINE SILT FENCE STORM SEWER i CATCH BASIN 0 STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACE PROPOSED ° CONCRETE SURFACE EXISTING BITUMINOUS 5 U RFACE . o EXI5TI NG CONCRETE e p ° SURFACE G ° GENERAL NOTES: 0 20 40 60 GRAPHIC SCALE /N FEET I . A COPY OF THE 5WPPP, INCLUDING COPIES OF ALL INSPECTION REPORTS, PLAN REVISIONS AND OTHER A550CIATED DOCUMENTS, MUST BE RETAINED AT THE PROJECT 51TE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR MUST IDENTIFY AN EK0510N CONTROL SUPERVISOR WHO SHALL BE KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 13E5T MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. 3. THE EK0510N CONTROL SUPERVISOR WILL WORK WITH THE PROJECT ENGINEER TO OVERSEE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 5WPPP, AND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EK0510N PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 13MP5 BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. EK0510N PREVENTION PRACTICES: 4. ALL EXP05ED 501L AREAS (INCLUDING STORM WATER POND 51DE SLOPES OR EXP05ED SOILS WITH A P051TIVE SLOPE TO A STORM WATER CONVEYANCE) WITH A CONTINUOUS P051TIVE SLOPE WITH 200 LINEAL FEET OF A SURFACE WATER MUST HAVE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT COVER FOR THE EXP05ED 501L AREAS YEAR ROUND, ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING TABLE OF SLOPE AND TIME FRAMES: SLOPES TIME MAXIMUM TIME AN AREA STEEPER THAN 3:1 7 DAYS CAN REMAIN OPEN WHEN FROM 10: 1 TO 3:1 14 DAYS THE AREA 15 NOT ACTIVELY FLATTER THAN 10: 1 21 DAY5 BEING WORKED. 5. THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES WILL BE 5TABLIZED WITHIN 200 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR POINT OF DISCHARGE. STABILIZATION SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION. G. PIPE OUTLETS MU5T BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY D1551PATION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: 7. ROCK ENTRANCES/EXITS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO MINIMIZE VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE USED IF THE ROCK ENTRANCES/EXITS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET 8. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND D15TUR13ING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. 9. TEMPORARY 501L STOCKPILES WITH HAVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND WILL NOT BE PLACED IN STORM WATER CONVEYANCES OR SURFACE WATERS. 10. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMP5 DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR D15CHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. 1 1. IF 10 ACRES OR MORE OF DISTURBED 501L 15 DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION, A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN 15 REQUIRED. IF THERE 15 A SPECIAL WATER OR IMPAIRED WATER WITHIN Y2 MILE AND IT 15 RECEIVING RUNOFF THEN 5 ACRES OR MORE OF DISTURBED 501L 15 DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION REQUIRES A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN. EK0510N t SEDIMENT CONTROL SEQUENCING: 12. 51LT FENCE, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, AND/OK OTHER SUITABLE PERIMETER EK0510N CONTROL MEA5UKE5 SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY GRADING OR LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. 13. TOP501L STOCKPILES WILL BE STORED ON 51TE AND AVAILABLE FOR THE HOMEBUILDEK. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BY SEED AND MULCH, AND EK0510N CONTROL BLANKET A5 SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN SHEETS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF THE MPCA PERMIT TRAN5FER/MODIFICATION FORM SUBMITTAL. 14. THE BUILDER SHALL INSTALL A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND ADEQUATE PERIMETER EK0510N CONTROL ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT SLOPES PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY A5 INDICATED ON PLANS. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING: 15. DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING ACTIVITIES OF TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN WATER SHALL BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT 5EDIMENTAION BA51N OR TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER. ENERGY D1551PATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL DISCHARGE POINT. DEWATERING OR BA51N DRAINING ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS, EK0510N IN RECEIVING CHANNELS OR ON DOWNSLOPE PROPERTIES, OR ADVERSELY IMPACT WETLANDS. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES: I G. 50LID WA5TE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, A5PHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTES SHALL BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. 17. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES SHALL BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCE55 TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOU5 WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. 18. EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES NEEDS TO BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE 51TF. RUNOFF NEEDS TO BE CONTAINED AND WASTE D15P05ED OF PROPERLY. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE:- 19. AINTENANCE: 19. INSPECTIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVEN GREATER THAN Y2 INCH IN 24 HOURS. 20. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS SHALL BE RETAINED ON 51TE WITH THE 5WPPP. 2 1 . ALL INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE THAT NO SEDIMENT FROM ONGOING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 15 REACHING THE INFILTRATION AREA AND THESE AREAS ARE PROTECTED FROM COMPACTION DUE TO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT DRIVING ACK055 THE INFILTRATION AREA. 22. STABILIZED AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED ONCE PEP, MONTH. WHERE WORK HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND ------ CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS AND MAINENANCE WILL TAKE PLACE A5 SOON A5 RUNOFF OCCURS AT THE 51TE OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 23. ALL 51LT FENCE MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THE BECOME NONFUCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHE5Y3 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR A5 SOON A5 / x 959. 1- FIELD CONSTRUCTION ALLOWS ACCESS. 24. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION 5A51N5 MUST BE DRAINED AND THE SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN THE DEPTH OF THE SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES Y2 THE STORAGE VOLUME. DRAINAGE AND REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR A5 SOON A5 FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. 25. CONSTRUCTION 51TE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS 5HALL BE INSPECTED FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF-SITE SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO PAVED SURFACES. TRACKED SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED FROM ALL OFF-SITE PAVED SURFACES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. N:\Land Projects\11103 -Landmark Center\dwg\Site Plan\11103-C4-SWPPP.dwg, 5/27/2011 1:56:16 PM EK05ION CONTROL SILT -FENCE EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC NEEDED WITHOUT WARMI5H SUPPORT STEEL OR WOOD P05T ft, OVERLAP GEOTEXTILE FABRIC G" AND FASTEN AT 2' I NTERVAL5 _T zT) LU �:�i Q ',u/ DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOW LU ( o EXTEND WIRE 0 O� m MESH INTO N ji TRENCH ' LU SILT FENCE - HEAVY DUTY TRENCH WITH GRAVEL STEEL T STUDDED P05T 5' MIN. LENGTH AT 8' MAX. SPACING _WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT -GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FABRIC ANCHORAGE -TRENCH BACKFILL WITH TAMPED NATURAL 501L 51LT FENCE NOTES: 1. 51LT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY EXCAVATING. 2. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN NECESSARY. 3. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEP051TED TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE SEDIMENT OFF-SITE AND CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 4. 51LT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON 5LOPE CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY. z_ O DIRECTION OF m RUNOFF FLOW 2"x2" WOOD P05T 4' MIN. LENGTH AT 4' MAX. SPACING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL WITH TAMPED NATURAL 501L " MIN. SILT FENCE - PREA55EMBLED WIMCO INLET PROTECTION Z EXISTING CURB WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. * FOR THE NEW R -3290-V15 STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE -ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY EARTHWORK. THESE ENTRANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FINAL GRADING IS COMPLETE. SEEDING -ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH MIXTURE NUMBER 50D PER MNDOT 3876 OR SODDED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET -EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER. BOCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL 1 "-2" WASHED ROCK GEOTEXTILE FABRIC - HARD SURFACE D-7 C ROAD ROCKX 9; CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE GEOTEXTILE BAG INLET PROTECTION INLET SPECIFICATIONS A5 PER THE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH AND WIDTH TO MATCH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE WOVEN MONOFILAMENT CONFORMING TO SPEC. 3886, TABLE 3884- I MACHINE SLICE FKONT, BACK AND BOTTOM TO BE MADE FROM SINGLE PIECE OF FABRIC X 959.36 USE KEBAK OK STEEL �0 ROD FOP, REMOVAL FOR INLETS WITH CAST CURB BOX USE WOOD 2x4, EXTEND 10" BEYOND GRATE WIDTH ON BOTH N SIDES, LENGTH VARIES, SECURE TO GRATE WITH WIRE OF, PLASTIC TIES 4"xG" OVAL HOLE SHALL BE HEAT CUT INTO ALL FOUR 51DE PANELS MINIMUM DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS ALL AROUND 51DE PIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETS NOTES: INLET PROTECTION DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED OR KPLACE5 AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. MANUFACTURED ALTERNATIVES APPROVED AND L15TED ON THE DEPARTMENTS ER0510N CONTROL PRODUCT ACCEPTABILITY L15T MAY BE SUBSTITUTED. WHEN REMOVING OR MAINTAINING INLET PROTECTION, CAKE SHALL BE TAKEN 50 THAT THE SEDIMENT TRAPPED ON THE GEOTECTILE FABRIC DOE5 NOT FALL IN THE INLET. ANY MATERIAL FALLING O INTO THE INLET SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 2 FINISHED SIZE, INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED, 5HALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10" O ARPUND THE PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OR REMOVCAL. FLAP POCKETS SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT WOOD 2x4. INSTALLATION NOTES: DO NOT INSTALL PROTECTION IN INLETS 5HALLOWER THAN 30", MEASURED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP OF THE GRATE. TRIM EXCE55 FABKID IN THE FLOW LINE TO WITHIN 3" OF THE GRATE. THE INSTALLED BAG 5HALL HAVE A MINIMUM 51DE CLEARANCE, BETWEEN THE INLET AND THE BAG MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW HOLES, OF 3". WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG, U51NG PLASTIC ZIP TIES, TO ACHIEVE THE 3" CLEARANCE. THE TIE5 SHALL BE PLACED AT A MAXIMUM OF 4" FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE BAG. X 958.44 Z° ARCHITECH: ENGINEER: Studio 22 Design Group, LLC 5030 Pennine Pass Columbia Heights, MN 55421 (612) 869 0467 USAQUATICS 124 BRIDGE AVE. E. P.O. BOX 86 DELANO, MN 55328 763-972-5897 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date Nicholas R. Nowacki License No. 45785 LAND SURVEYOR: '''�LAN0 SERVICES 1' 55313 ///770 111Buffa o, MIN North Ph. 763.682.1781 www.meyerrohlin.com MRLS PROJECT NO. 11103 PREPARED FOR Pointmark Construction 2560 Byrd Ave N Golden Valley, MN 763 843 5651 ISSUE RECORD: 05/27/11: REVIEW SET PROJECT NUMBER DATE 05/27/11 PROJECT MANAGER E. MUNT DRAWN BY AAN CHECKED BY NRN *This document may not be used or copied without prior written consent * Errors may occur in the transmission of electronic files. Studio22 is not responsible for any claims, damages or expenses arising out of unauthorized use of information contained in electronic files. * Electronic files may not accurately reflect the final as built conditions. It is the responsibility of the user to verify layouts, dimensions and related information. PROJECT NAME LANDMARK CENTER LOCATION MONTICELLO, MN SHEET TITLE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHEET NUMBER C1.4 I / X 958.4b OVERFLOW 15 %2 OF _ - - ------ _ THE CURB BOX HEIGHT --�� / x 959. 1- DEFLECTOR PLATE / ' 1(958.02 _ OVERFLOW 15 %2 OF / THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER A55EM13LY / CURB 00 46 FILTER A55EM13LY DIAMETER, G" ON -GRADE / �� 0 10" AT LOW POI NT - HIGH-FLOW FABRIC \ °� 1 0) X 958.19 BOCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL 1 "-2" WASHED ROCK GEOTEXTILE FABRIC - HARD SURFACE D-7 C ROAD ROCKX 9; CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE GEOTEXTILE BAG INLET PROTECTION INLET SPECIFICATIONS A5 PER THE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH AND WIDTH TO MATCH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE WOVEN MONOFILAMENT CONFORMING TO SPEC. 3886, TABLE 3884- I MACHINE SLICE FKONT, BACK AND BOTTOM TO BE MADE FROM SINGLE PIECE OF FABRIC X 959.36 USE KEBAK OK STEEL �0 ROD FOP, REMOVAL FOR INLETS WITH CAST CURB BOX USE WOOD 2x4, EXTEND 10" BEYOND GRATE WIDTH ON BOTH N SIDES, LENGTH VARIES, SECURE TO GRATE WITH WIRE OF, PLASTIC TIES 4"xG" OVAL HOLE SHALL BE HEAT CUT INTO ALL FOUR 51DE PANELS MINIMUM DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS ALL AROUND 51DE PIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETS NOTES: INLET PROTECTION DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED OR KPLACE5 AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. MANUFACTURED ALTERNATIVES APPROVED AND L15TED ON THE DEPARTMENTS ER0510N CONTROL PRODUCT ACCEPTABILITY L15T MAY BE SUBSTITUTED. WHEN REMOVING OR MAINTAINING INLET PROTECTION, CAKE SHALL BE TAKEN 50 THAT THE SEDIMENT TRAPPED ON THE GEOTECTILE FABRIC DOE5 NOT FALL IN THE INLET. ANY MATERIAL FALLING O INTO THE INLET SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 2 FINISHED SIZE, INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED, 5HALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10" O ARPUND THE PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OR REMOVCAL. FLAP POCKETS SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT WOOD 2x4. INSTALLATION NOTES: DO NOT INSTALL PROTECTION IN INLETS 5HALLOWER THAN 30", MEASURED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP OF THE GRATE. TRIM EXCE55 FABKID IN THE FLOW LINE TO WITHIN 3" OF THE GRATE. THE INSTALLED BAG 5HALL HAVE A MINIMUM 51DE CLEARANCE, BETWEEN THE INLET AND THE BAG MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW HOLES, OF 3". WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG, U51NG PLASTIC ZIP TIES, TO ACHIEVE THE 3" CLEARANCE. THE TIE5 SHALL BE PLACED AT A MAXIMUM OF 4" FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE BAG. X 958.44 Z° ARCHITECH: ENGINEER: Studio 22 Design Group, LLC 5030 Pennine Pass Columbia Heights, MN 55421 (612) 869 0467 USAQUATICS 124 BRIDGE AVE. E. P.O. BOX 86 DELANO, MN 55328 763-972-5897 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date Nicholas R. Nowacki License No. 45785 LAND SURVEYOR: '''�LAN0 SERVICES 1' 55313 ///770 111Buffa o, MIN North Ph. 763.682.1781 www.meyerrohlin.com MRLS PROJECT NO. 11103 PREPARED FOR Pointmark Construction 2560 Byrd Ave N Golden Valley, MN 763 843 5651 ISSUE RECORD: 05/27/11: REVIEW SET PROJECT NUMBER DATE 05/27/11 PROJECT MANAGER E. MUNT DRAWN BY AAN CHECKED BY NRN *This document may not be used or copied without prior written consent * Errors may occur in the transmission of electronic files. Studio22 is not responsible for any claims, damages or expenses arising out of unauthorized use of information contained in electronic files. * Electronic files may not accurately reflect the final as built conditions. It is the responsibility of the user to verify layouts, dimensions and related information. PROJECT NAME LANDMARK CENTER LOCATION MONTICELLO, MN SHEET TITLE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHEET NUMBER C1.4 I CONCRETE BOLLARD ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PIANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0. 10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION BACK OF CURB NOTES: SECTION A -A REINFORCING TO CON515T OF #4 BARS AT 8" OC BOTH WAYS POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION DOME �ONCKETE N PIPE 4M ETER "EEL PIPE .LED WITH )NCRETE PAINT COLOR TO BE YELLOW OR COVER WITH PLASTIC MAINTENANCE FREE YELLOW PLASTIC SLEEVE PLACE STEEL PIPE IN CONCRETE STANDARD 4b" CATCH BASIN CASTING TO BE SET O. 101 BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 1 2" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE COLLAR PLAN ACCE551BLE 51GN DETAIL 12"X 18" .080 STANDARD UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN WITH 2-3/8"0 CADMIUM BOLTS, NUTS AND LOCKS. THIS SIGN TYPICAL AT EACH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. STANDARD "VAN - ACCESSIBLE" SIGN REQUIRED AT VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING o STALLS ONLY. Ln 2" DIA. GALVANIZED STEEL POST N FINISHED GRADE 77777777 Q 3000 PSI CONCRETE NOTE: ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN SHALL CONFORM WITH J-4 CURRENT STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS. 35 1/4 " 1 43" 1 CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R-3246 WITH TYPE "L" GRATE MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA CRETEX TYPE 11 WITH 24N 30 6" OPENING MANHOLE STEPS I G" O.C. ALUMINUM OR COPOLYMER POLY PLASTIC. 2'' 24' ALL JOINTS IN MH WILL HAVE RUBBER GASKETS CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE w g AND PIPE CONNECTION Q� >� 0 RCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 4338 OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. N:\Land Projects\11103 -Landmark Center\dwg\Site Plan\11103-C5-Details.dwg, 5/27/2011 1:57:46 PM HYDRANT WITH VALVE INSTALLATION MEGALUG PRECAST CONCRETE J MEGALUG BLOCK (2'x2' BEARING SURFACE) PRECAST CONCRETE BASE AS SPECIFIED (I 5"x 15"X 4") CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE OR SOLID MAY BE OMITTED WHEN USING CONCRETE BLOCKS' MEGALUGS AND ZINC COATED RODS. " MAY BE OMITTED WHEN USING HYDRANT BLOCKING. FINISHED GRADE OR 5' IN BACK OF CURB cz If CONCRETE WALK OR BITUMINOUS PATH ARE 00 PRESENT HYDRAFINDER MEGALUG FLAG WATEROUS PACER 2 LAYERS OF HYDRANT > YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG TO BE POLY (4 m)I INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. AFTER BACK -FILL w I CONCRETE z 0 WALK MIN I CU YD BREAKOFF FLANGE " TO 2" MAXIMUM ABOVE OF GRAVEL FINISHED GRADE IL I O VALVE BOX AS SPECIFIED I " TO 2" MEGALUG PRECAST CONCRETE J MEGALUG BLOCK (2'x2' BEARING SURFACE) PRECAST CONCRETE BASE AS SPECIFIED (I 5"x 15"X 4") CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE OR SOLID MAY BE OMITTED WHEN USING CONCRETE BLOCKS' MEGALUGS AND ZINC COATED RODS. " MAY BE OMITTED WHEN USING HYDRANT BLOCKING. FINISHED GRADE 114 " STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR cz WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. 00 OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG Ly- (n 2 LAYERS OF > w 21- 6" POLY (4 m)I CONCRETE CONCRETE WALK CONCRETE zz 0 WALK MIN I CU YD o WALK OF GRAVEL Jc0 MEGALUG PRECAST CONCRETE J MEGALUG BLOCK (2'x2' BEARING SURFACE) PRECAST CONCRETE BASE AS SPECIFIED (I 5"x 15"X 4") CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE OR SOLID MAY BE OMITTED WHEN USING CONCRETE BLOCKS' MEGALUGS AND ZINC COATED RODS. " MAY BE OMITTED WHEN USING HYDRANT BLOCKING. FINISHED GRADE PROVIDE 2 ZINC COATED TIE RODS AND GALVANIZED ACCESSORIES FROM TEE ON WATERMAIN TO VALVE PROVIDE 2 ZINC COATED TIE RODS AND GALVANIZED ACCESSORIES FROM VALVE TO HYDRANT " WOOD BARRICADE DETAIL TOP VIEW G"XG" TREATED WOOD ° P05T5 @ 4'0.C. COUNTER51NK 1 " G"XG" 0 TREATED ° WOOD P05T I I 0 I � o I 2"X 1211 rl TREATED 0 I LUMBER m T ° 1211 1 3/8" GALVANIZED TREATED LUMBER CARRIAGE BOLT W/ I I III I WASHER � NUT (2 PER 1-05T - EACH BOARD) III I FIN15HED-_______ I I i, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII GRADE I III—III—III —�— I11- w—I—IT1= MEW I I I I III I I I I I I I I I —III— NO .Le1 -1� IIIII—II �I� �-IIIII—j 0 I I IIIllllllllIII �IIIIIIIII' LU 0 11 I II E I TI II -- Fit- —IT fl] — —I = I I=1 T T —IIIII 1=1 —III - m 1� :EW "=I�1II1 I�I - 1' LU :III_ , m '-1 I I—III—I 11=1 I I—I 11=1 11=1' I' I-IIII1�I I I1. I I I —I I I I I—IIIIII—I I I I I—IIII 11=1 I I- '' gI T II I I II I II I I SAMPLING MANHOLE DETAIL GROUTING BTWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT ALL MANHOLES WITH INSIDE DROP SECTION SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CLASS II CIRCULAR KEINE LATEST REVISION USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS BARREL TO CONFORM TO ASTM C-478 LATEST REVISION CHIMNEY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) "CKETEX OR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE O FRAME AND COVER ADJUSTING RINGS MIN 4" -MAX 12" 27" DIA I WITH EXTERNAL OR INTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL O I 8° v J m Q 48" DIA STEPS AT I G" OC 7 �l b J m � V O2 VARIABLE PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION +,-;'i+�!'; ti *%• WITH INVERT #5 AT 12" OC EACH WAY NOTES: 0 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED I G" OC. O IF DROP IS GREATER THAN 24" INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DROP. 0 MANHOLE FRAME t- COVER NEENAH R- I G42 LETTERED "SANITARY SEWER' WITH 2 CONCEALED PICKHOLES t- SELF SEALING LID. MIN. SLAB THICKNESS OF G" FOR 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS I " FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 1 4' REINFORCED W/ G"I I C/ 10 MESH G" MIN 0 0 0 0 VA IN LINE CLEANOUT USE 4" C15P PLUG AND CA� FINISHED GRADE NOTE: CLEANOUT CAP SHALL BE MINNEAPOL15 STANDARD. RI E5 C15P CLEANOUT R15ER — WITH THREADED BRASS PLUG USP 422 OR EQUAL. 4" PVC K15EK 4" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) I/8 BEND 2000 P51 CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET FOR CEMENTED PLUG PVC '-HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 114 " STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG L DESIRED MINIMUM GATE VALVE PROVIDE 2 ZINC COATED TIE RODS AND GALVANIZED ACCESSORIES FROM TEE ON WATERMAIN TO VALVE PROVIDE 2 ZINC COATED TIE RODS AND GALVANIZED ACCESSORIES FROM VALVE TO HYDRANT " WOOD BARRICADE DETAIL TOP VIEW G"XG" TREATED WOOD ° P05T5 @ 4'0.C. COUNTER51NK 1 " G"XG" 0 TREATED ° WOOD P05T I I 0 I � o I 2"X 1211 rl TREATED 0 I LUMBER m T ° 1211 1 3/8" GALVANIZED TREATED LUMBER CARRIAGE BOLT W/ I I III I WASHER � NUT (2 PER 1-05T - EACH BOARD) III I FIN15HED-_______ I I i, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII GRADE I III—III—III —�— I11- w—I—IT1= MEW I I I I III I I I I I I I I I —III— NO .Le1 -1� IIIII—II �I� �-IIIII—j 0 I I IIIllllllllIII �IIIIIIIII' LU 0 11 I II E I TI II -- Fit- —IT fl] — —I = I I=1 T T —IIIII 1=1 —III - m 1� :EW "=I�1II1 I�I - 1' LU :III_ , m '-1 I I—III—I 11=1 I I—I 11=1 11=1' I' I-IIII1�I I I1. I I I —I I I I I—IIIIII—I I I I I—IIII 11=1 I I- '' gI T II I I II I II I I SAMPLING MANHOLE DETAIL GROUTING BTWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT ALL MANHOLES WITH INSIDE DROP SECTION SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CLASS II CIRCULAR KEINE LATEST REVISION USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS BARREL TO CONFORM TO ASTM C-478 LATEST REVISION CHIMNEY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) "CKETEX OR APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE O FRAME AND COVER ADJUSTING RINGS MIN 4" -MAX 12" 27" DIA I WITH EXTERNAL OR INTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL O I 8° v J m Q 48" DIA STEPS AT I G" OC 7 �l b J m � V O2 VARIABLE PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION +,-;'i+�!'; ti *%• WITH INVERT #5 AT 12" OC EACH WAY NOTES: 0 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED I G" OC. O IF DROP IS GREATER THAN 24" INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DROP. 0 MANHOLE FRAME t- COVER NEENAH R- I G42 LETTERED "SANITARY SEWER' WITH 2 CONCEALED PICKHOLES t- SELF SEALING LID. MIN. SLAB THICKNESS OF G" FOR 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS I " FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 1 4' REINFORCED W/ G"I I C/ 10 MESH G" MIN 0 0 0 0 VA IN LINE CLEANOUT USE 4" C15P PLUG AND CA� FINISHED GRADE NOTE: CLEANOUT CAP SHALL BE MINNEAPOL15 STANDARD. RI E5 C15P CLEANOUT R15ER — WITH THREADED BRASS PLUG USP 422 OR EQUAL. 4" PVC K15EK 4" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) I/8 BEND 2000 P51 CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET FOR CEMENTED PLUG PVC '-HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP NOTES: 5'-4" (G" CURB) 4'-0" DESIRABLE 3'-4" (4" CURB) 0.08 ft/ft 0.02 ft/ft MAX Q2 CONCRETE 03 WALK OR FLATTER SECTION A -A 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE OF FLARED SIDE, (IF EXISTING CONDITIONS DO NOT PERMIT, MAY USE 0. 10 ft/ft - 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE) GATE VALVE DETAIL "WATER" PRINTED ON COVER. ARCHITECH: Studio 22 Design Group, LLC 5030 Pennine Pass Columbia Heights, MN 55421 (612) 869 0467 C.I. ADJUSTABLE ENGINEER: VALVE BOX 3 PIECES. MIN 8.0' COVER USAQUATICS 1/2" RUBBER GASKET (UNLESS OTHERWISE 124 BRIDGE AVE. E. INSTALLED BETWEEN NOTED) THE GATE VALVE AND P.O. BOX 86 GATE VALVE ADAPTOR 1/4" STEEL VALVE DELANO, MN BOX ADAPTOR WITH 55328 1/2 CU. PROTECTIVE COATING YD. GRAVEL AS MANUFACTURED 763-972-5897 BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL I hereby certify that this plan, spe ification, or report was prepared by m r under my direct supervision and WATERMAIN WATERMAIN a duly Licensed Professional GATE VALVE ngine r under the laws of the State of innesota. NOTE: If GATE VALVE BOXES ARE EXTENDED, THERE to SHALL BE A GATE VALVE NUT EXTENSION TO WITHIN 7.5' OF FINISHED GRADE. Nicholas R. Nowacki License No. 45785 LAND SURVEYOR: LANA SERVICE i 1111 Highway 25 North Buffalo, MN 55313 Ph. 763.682.1781 www. meyerrohlin.com MRLS PROJECT NO. 11103 PREPARED FOR Pointmark Construction 2560 Byrd Ave N Golden Valley, MN 763 843 5651 B� BACK OF CURB (USE THIS DESIGN WHEN SIDEWALK WIDTH DOES NOT ALLOW FOR A 4' LANDING) ' 4'-2" (4" CURB) ' 4'-0" MIIN. ' 4'-2" (4" CURB) 6 B PLAN VIEW OF "PARALLEL" RAMP ROUND ALL SLIPED INTERSECTIONS 0-3" (G" CURB t, 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE) 4'_O © (G" CURB 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE) 4'-2" T T 4 -2 (4" CURB 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE) (4" CURB 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE) I . %2 INCH PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL, AA5HTO M 2 13. 2.WHEN POSSIBLE, PROVIDE A PATH OF TRAVEL 4'-0" WIDE BEHIND PEDE5TKIAN RAMP. A RELATIVELY FLAT 4'x4' LANDING WILL ALLOW WHEELCHAIRS TO NAVIGATE AROUND THE PEDE5TRIAN RAMP. 3. WHEN A MEDIAN 15 NOT WIDE ENOUGH FOR TWO PEDE5TKIAN RAMPS AND A 48" LANDING BETWEEN THEM. THE PEDESTRIAN CK055ING SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE MEDIAN AT STREET LEVEL. 4. G" TO 8" 15 THE REQUIRED OFFSET OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING5/TRUNCATED DOME AREA FROM THE FRONT FACE OF CURB, OR PLACE THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE BACK OF CURB. 5. ADA REQUIRED TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE 2'-0" MIN. IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH (3'-0" OR 4'-0" TYP.) OF THE CURB RAMP. THIS 2'-0" BY 3'-0" OR 4'-0" WIDTH (TYP.) TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A LIGHT COLOR (LIGHT GRAY, WHITE, OR YELLOW) WHEN THE ADJACENT 51DEWALK 15 A DARK COLOR. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A DARK COLOR (RED, BLACK, DARK GRAY, OF, BRIGHT YELLOW) WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK 15 A "WHITE" OR LIGHT GRAY CEMENT COLOR. COLORING AGENT MAY BE ADDED IN THE FIELD. G. 4'-0" FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. 3'-0" ALLOWED FOR RETROFITS OR PRESERVATION PROJECTS. 7. COLOR OF THE TRUNCATED DOME AREA AND SURROUNDING 51DEWALK SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SIDEWALK WIDTH T CONCRETE MAX. CROSS POSSIBLE CURB TO WALK SLOPE 0.02 ft/ft HOLD ADJACENT GROUND SECTION B -B 50% to G5% OF BASE DIAMETER DOME SECTION 1 %8' - 23/8' I (G" (TYP ) DOME 00 00 0. 0 0 0 0 0000000000 15/8'- 23/8' 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V6,(nP) 00000 0000 } %8' MIN. 'MIN. DOME SPACING ISSUE RECORD: 05/27/11: REVIEW SET PROJECT NUMBER DATE 05/27/11 PROJECT MANAGER E. MUNT DRAWN BY AAN CHECKED BY NRN *This document may not be used or copied without prior written consent * Errors may occur in the transmission of electronic files. Studio22 is not responsible for any claims, damages or expenses arising out of unauthorized use of information contained in electronic files. * Electronic files may not accurately reflect the final as built conditions. It is the responsibility of the user to verify layouts, dimensions and related information. PROJECT NAME LANDMARK CENTER LOCATION MONTICELLO, MN SHEET TITLE DETAILS SHEET NUMBER C1.5 I A � A DESIRED MINIMUM hI~� OUTER LIMITS OF CONCRETE CONCRETE WALK CONCRETE 0 WALK o WALK 4'-0" 4'-0" 5'-8" 5 5'-8" �m vm �m vm v m y 5 BACK OF CURB v Ln m y 5 FRONT FACE OF CURB Ln O FRONT FACE o °o 0 0 0 0 a o e OF CURB N ���oe o ° ° 6' 3" (6 6 Cv�61 t0 eoeo 183) 4 2" (4„ Co B) X32` `A„ CV�01 4 G O 4'-2" (4" CURB) 4' 0" 6 4'-2" (4" CURB) A� A—J PLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP PLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMP NOTES: 5'-4" (G" CURB) 4'-0" DESIRABLE 3'-4" (4" CURB) 0.08 ft/ft 0.02 ft/ft MAX Q2 CONCRETE 03 WALK OR FLATTER SECTION A -A 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE OF FLARED SIDE, (IF EXISTING CONDITIONS DO NOT PERMIT, MAY USE 0. 10 ft/ft - 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE) GATE VALVE DETAIL "WATER" PRINTED ON COVER. ARCHITECH: Studio 22 Design Group, LLC 5030 Pennine Pass Columbia Heights, MN 55421 (612) 869 0467 C.I. ADJUSTABLE ENGINEER: VALVE BOX 3 PIECES. MIN 8.0' COVER USAQUATICS 1/2" RUBBER GASKET (UNLESS OTHERWISE 124 BRIDGE AVE. E. INSTALLED BETWEEN NOTED) THE GATE VALVE AND P.O. BOX 86 GATE VALVE ADAPTOR 1/4" STEEL VALVE DELANO, MN BOX ADAPTOR WITH 55328 1/2 CU. PROTECTIVE COATING YD. GRAVEL AS MANUFACTURED 763-972-5897 BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL I hereby certify that this plan, spe ification, or report was prepared by m r under my direct supervision and WATERMAIN WATERMAIN a duly Licensed Professional GATE VALVE ngine r under the laws of the State of innesota. NOTE: If GATE VALVE BOXES ARE EXTENDED, THERE to SHALL BE A GATE VALVE NUT EXTENSION TO WITHIN 7.5' OF FINISHED GRADE. Nicholas R. Nowacki License No. 45785 LAND SURVEYOR: LANA SERVICE i 1111 Highway 25 North Buffalo, MN 55313 Ph. 763.682.1781 www. meyerrohlin.com MRLS PROJECT NO. 11103 PREPARED FOR Pointmark Construction 2560 Byrd Ave N Golden Valley, MN 763 843 5651 B� BACK OF CURB (USE THIS DESIGN WHEN SIDEWALK WIDTH DOES NOT ALLOW FOR A 4' LANDING) ' 4'-2" (4" CURB) ' 4'-0" MIIN. ' 4'-2" (4" CURB) 6 B PLAN VIEW OF "PARALLEL" RAMP ROUND ALL SLIPED INTERSECTIONS 0-3" (G" CURB t, 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE) 4'_O © (G" CURB 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE) 4'-2" T T 4 -2 (4" CURB 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE) (4" CURB 0.08 ft/ft SLOPE) I . %2 INCH PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL, AA5HTO M 2 13. 2.WHEN POSSIBLE, PROVIDE A PATH OF TRAVEL 4'-0" WIDE BEHIND PEDE5TKIAN RAMP. A RELATIVELY FLAT 4'x4' LANDING WILL ALLOW WHEELCHAIRS TO NAVIGATE AROUND THE PEDE5TRIAN RAMP. 3. WHEN A MEDIAN 15 NOT WIDE ENOUGH FOR TWO PEDE5TKIAN RAMPS AND A 48" LANDING BETWEEN THEM. THE PEDESTRIAN CK055ING SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE MEDIAN AT STREET LEVEL. 4. G" TO 8" 15 THE REQUIRED OFFSET OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING5/TRUNCATED DOME AREA FROM THE FRONT FACE OF CURB, OR PLACE THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE BACK OF CURB. 5. ADA REQUIRED TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE 2'-0" MIN. IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH (3'-0" OR 4'-0" TYP.) OF THE CURB RAMP. THIS 2'-0" BY 3'-0" OR 4'-0" WIDTH (TYP.) TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A LIGHT COLOR (LIGHT GRAY, WHITE, OR YELLOW) WHEN THE ADJACENT 51DEWALK 15 A DARK COLOR. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A DARK COLOR (RED, BLACK, DARK GRAY, OF, BRIGHT YELLOW) WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK 15 A "WHITE" OR LIGHT GRAY CEMENT COLOR. COLORING AGENT MAY BE ADDED IN THE FIELD. G. 4'-0" FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. 3'-0" ALLOWED FOR RETROFITS OR PRESERVATION PROJECTS. 7. COLOR OF THE TRUNCATED DOME AREA AND SURROUNDING 51DEWALK SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SIDEWALK WIDTH T CONCRETE MAX. CROSS POSSIBLE CURB TO WALK SLOPE 0.02 ft/ft HOLD ADJACENT GROUND SECTION B -B 50% to G5% OF BASE DIAMETER DOME SECTION 1 %8' - 23/8' I (G" (TYP ) DOME 00 00 0. 0 0 0 0 0000000000 15/8'- 23/8' 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V6,(nP) 00000 0000 } %8' MIN. 'MIN. DOME SPACING ISSUE RECORD: 05/27/11: REVIEW SET PROJECT NUMBER DATE 05/27/11 PROJECT MANAGER E. MUNT DRAWN BY AAN CHECKED BY NRN *This document may not be used or copied without prior written consent * Errors may occur in the transmission of electronic files. Studio22 is not responsible for any claims, damages or expenses arising out of unauthorized use of information contained in electronic files. * Electronic files may not accurately reflect the final as built conditions. It is the responsibility of the user to verify layouts, dimensions and related information. PROJECT NAME LANDMARK CENTER LOCATION MONTICELLO, MN SHEET TITLE DETAILS SHEET NUMBER C1.5 I ;a Fab OM 0 Ann sto, Men 4 6; Pre - FTfI 6"It- Met, C EIFS Falt)rTc on Alu Amod. storel Mae. W 5aeo East Elova tion 1/80 a P -V" South Elova tion 1/80 - P -W Pro - FTM Mess_ CC F: IFS HDPE I Enal- West Elova tion 1*0 m P-0" it, 19 ('7North Elevation K!f� 1/8" a P-0" ra I hereby cwrtffy tout thio plan, apecimcattom or report wAs Pre. pared by me or under my direct owpervistom and Wet I if" a duly IAwb of the *tat* of Mwwoota. sisnaturaz &aw*dn m »k 'rola 22"Al TKO docawd 16 by NwIsm Budding 4 Development. kr— (N50) and contains pnvqmsd and wmirldwLIA1 Piromistion Winded for we by Nw pereomel only. Any d7scI~e or d1strIbutIon of this document or IntarmAtron C.0ruh-4d Meta, without prior written consent oF N50, is prohibited CALL RIGHTS RESERVED LN" 6wmJ c o� d� AwmTme L Frm- z Tenant Sign 26 &f. Tenant Sign 26s.f ® U REVISIOW own"= 5 South Elova tion 1/80 - P -W Pro - FTM Mess_ CC F: IFS HDPE I Enal- West Elova tion 1*0 m P-0" it, 19 ('7North Elevation K!f� 1/8" a P-0" ra I hereby cwrtffy tout thio plan, apecimcattom or report wAs Pre. pared by me or under my direct owpervistom and Wet I if" a duly IAwb of the *tat* of Mwwoota. sisnaturaz &aw*dn m »k 'rola 22"Al TKO docawd 16 by NwIsm Budding 4 Development. kr— (N50) and contains pnvqmsd and wmirldwLIA1 Piromistion Winded for we by Nw pereomel only. Any d7scI~e or d1strIbutIon of this document or IntarmAtron C.0ruh-4d Meta, without prior written consent oF N50, is prohibited CALL RIGHTS RESERVED LN" 6wmJ c o� d� � z ® U REVISIOW 5 L P-4 P4 IHEEI N0,A3.11 AS jrM Alk long !IM I sit & . 9 East Elevation South Elevation North Elevation 2 Division Street E. -Suite 201 Buffalo, MN 55313 763-632-1818 LEGEND (PROP05ED) (EXOTING) 1�----� 5TORM 5wm q wDP) 51DEWALK CURBING Df7AIL LAT UNE Q STORM NIMMOLI! (Mr) HE 'CHE OVERHEAD eLECfRIC W.W.. Iqy CATCH BASIN Mr) f TlrouToUP0 wom a (ag 1711 NAiV ARROW c4m. ALL CATCH BA51N M i. i ALL G MTD PAVWG AS OCl' 0 51UMAL& - SR: SRC nm FOR I9il D II SIGN MW5FACING a 0 ® N RI R LOW TD ksATCH R O1V IjUe of CURS # Gumx Gii1 m r -0- FCWEK POLE ::;•, ; is = :.ra P'ROP�D3® z Ta;I:EPFIOHE ltl9J`R 0 DITUMINOU5 5URPACC _�: �. ; F�.• �.: '-,_� ,'.:' PwDt'OBED g UNDERGROUND GAS SIGN .s :s=i''.,•'�. .` ;.-�,' CONCP=SUWACE BUuNOIa x 5PT ELCVATION(FIMPS5nNG SUN .SI. IDC - /'/K Or CURB »G - GROUND tiit'_V. of va CONCRIEfI` 0 BUILDING a . a :• . . - SURFACE FOS - rAGE OF51DLWAUC SIT - BITUMINOUS CONC - CONCiil:Ilt` 0 20 40 60 GIRAPW SGUE IN FEET GOIEiAI• CON5TKt)CiiON NOTI5 1) COMRAaCH, SMALL FIELD VMPYTHE IDCAT>tONS AND NATIONS OF EM STING UMITIEB AND TOPOGRAMIC MATURES, PRIOR TO STAKr OP 51i>E GRADING• THE CONTKACI'OK SHALL IMMMIATCLY NOTIFYIHE PLS] XT ENGINrM Of ANY D13Ck&ANC1t5 OR VAKIATIO" MWm I'L.A,N5. 2) CONTRACTOR SNAIL CONTACT %OPHM STAT r OW CALL' FOR UTfLfTy LOCATiON 454-OOW OR i -8M25 I A I Gs VM IN 2-4HR. PRIOKTO ECAVATiON. 3) ALL 0ONSTJRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO MINNE5C ITA. DE PAWMEW OF TRANSPOKTATiON "5TANDARi3 5rMFICATION5 FOR CONSTRUCTiON'. 4) CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY f'ok AND OBTAIN THE GM4MAL 5TOKM WATM PERMIT' FOR CON3TKl C710N ACTTVf1Y FRRDM Tnt W14NE50TA POLI113LON GONTRQL A.GfWcY PRIOR To GON5rRUC[1QN AGTTVtTY. 5) CONTRACTOR SHAD. COMPLY W1rH ALL NPDc5 AND LLCM WATMMEID RFQUI RRAENTS. 6) GRADING WOK AND CONSTRUCTION MDIPMCNT 5"ALl. NOTTRE5PA55 ON ADJACMI PRIVATE PRCWPl nES. TM 1: CONiRAeT'OR 5HALL BI~ 1RMP0NSIEU TO ANY CLAW imur w MOM 5" ACnOhl5. 7) IF ANY CLJEAFJNG, GRUBMNG. OR TRASH RMVAL IS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OP TH15 PROJECT. IT SHALL DE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT ISTD AMOUNT. THIS SMALL INCLUDE THE R&AOVAL Or TRIZ9. 5TUMP5, FINaNG, VMffAPON, CULVMM, AND ALL MLd4=UAP WL)5 DPF3RI3 FOUND WITHIN THE M O.ILCT BOUNDARIm. 171F- CONTRACTOR 5HALL BE MPON31131.P i`OR Of? SiT1E MiOVAL AND D15PO5AL OF ALL MATERIAL PL=R LOCAL STATE. AND FfDERAI REWIJi2IsMENTS. S) All MATERIAL5 R62UIRED FOR THIS WDRK 5HALL BE NEW MATMAL CONFORMI NG TO THE REQUIU ME9+f m FOR CLA55.10N0. GRADE. 5f7E. QUALITY, AND OTHER DLTA115 5PfCIFIED I1MN OXA5 5HOM ON THE PLANS_ DO NOT U5E RF -CMM OR SALVAGED AC-GREGATE, A5niALTIC PAVEMENT, CRUSHEDCQNCPZTE. OR SCRAP 511ING Z. UNLIZ5 OTHE:F,LIVI5E INDICATED. THE CX TXALTOK 5MI PUKNI5H AIL IRL'QUIRI:D MAWR AL5. 9) FJ5TORIE THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. REPLACE ANY CONCREM CURS AND GUTT R, 5MMINOUS PA% AGENT. 51DLWALi� OR VEGETATIVE COVER DAMAGro 13Y THE OON53RUC ION ACTIVITY. 1z3TCiM DAMAGM TURF W TH 5013 WI Ti-IIN THE PU3LIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE WORK AREA SHOWN 15 GENERAL AND MAY NEED TO BE ADJL MM IN TH E° nE D, 10) ALL STRFEf IRFSTORATiON 5MAU. BE CAMPLIrTW FEK CITY STAN DAKuS. 1 1) SfRAIGHir UNE SAW -velli EXISTiNG MWINOU3 OR COXCRM 5URFACiNG AT THE FVUM=OF PAVEMENT REMOVALARFA5. U3£ SAW5 TUAT F VIDE WATI RTO THP. BLADE. TAM AND MATGN ALL CQNN=oN5 TQ w5-nNG BiTUMINOU5 PAVE.t I2g. PAKRiNDWG EAKtHWO RK CORTKA=F, 5tVU PERFORM ALL EA,E KWiDRK OPERATIONS TO MEET ALL AFFUCABLE LAWS. ORDINM#CES. 05HA. ANDIOIL 51'ATE 5AMrY GUIVM Nt5. EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR 15 RMPONSIBLE fOR ALL GRADING. 501L CORK=0N AND BUILDING PAD PREPARATION TO 5Ul3GRADF: EA1MWORK CONiTt -CTOR SHALL TSE R45PON51BLE FOR ALL FOUNDATION EXCAVATiON AND OACAFILL, GLJK13 BACWLI, SAND CUSHION, VAPOR BARRIER BdJO iP SAND CUSHION, EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR S(I)LL INiSTAIL BLANC VIRT AT LEAST 0 DEEP IN ALL PLANTING AREAS, FREE OF LARGE LUMPS. STONC5 AND 5TICO. GRADEDAND RI`►W FOR RMING. BLACK DIRT MAY BETAgN FROM ORGANIC ON 51M 5(>URM, IF AVALLABLIE. FAKI11WORK CONTRACTOR 5MALL• rOUJOW7HE R )CIMMENDAT10N5 OF THE SOIL TEST t EP0KT FOR ALL EARTHWOM MATERMAL5 IMPORTED TO THE SITE SHALL MEET WUH sols_ MGINU R5 AP FAL AND SHALL Dt CER rizD A5 NoN-CONTAMItIATED. T me kmuitjD comi'ACTioN OP ALL PAVEMMr GRAVING AND BUILDING 9UBGRADE SHALL BE 100% Of THI! STANDARD I'FR=OR DEN5IIY. ALL TRENCMI5 *MIN FAVI=MMM ARVa SHALL BE CAMPACTW TO I W% Or STANuAw MoCfOR VEN50Y. FOUNIDATiON WALL BAML L 511ALL 13E PLACED IN MAMMUM G' LIFT5 AT 90% MODIFIED PROCTOR, FIELD DEN51TY TUTS SHALL BE TAKEN FOR EACM Z OF PILL POP. EVERY 2,500 S.F. OF r=K AVXA CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY TH OWJriE K Wmi DOCLlMMW TEST W 5MTO SY AN I NWM DW TE,TiNG LADDRATOKY ON UTILITY. 5TREE7. AND FiLL COMPACTION TE 575. CaNSTRUCnON 70LERANM POR EMUhW=5tiALL BE P1115 OR MINUS 111 O OF A FOOT. 131NMiNOL15 PAVING FURN1511 AND IN5TALL ALL DUUMINOLIIS PAVING AS CAU31 FUDR ON THE PLANS. FOLLt7W RECOMMENOATIONS Of Tri1: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, MUORTO Y NE GRADING OFTHE 5TM, PAVING CONTRACTOK5HALL INS? Cr THE PKOMKIYAND VJEJFYThAT TiiE 5Ut3GMI! 15 WITHIN PLUB OR MINUS 1/10 OF A POOL AND THAT THE 5UBGRADE CONDITION 15 SUITABLE TO ACCEPT THE BAM MATERJAL RI`LATIVI<TO BOIL• COMPACTION AND M015WRE. Ir1AE sE GDNDfnM ARe NOT P0E5ENT. PAVING 0ONTRACFOR 5HALL NOTIFY THE COW ACTOR AND Nor PROCEW UNTIL ACCWTABLE CORK=VE MEA5URE3 HAVE DEET! TALI. PAVING GO TRAGTORSHALL RCU 171C PARJKINO LDr 5UHGRADt: PRIoxTO INSTAI.IATION OF BA5E MATERIAI5 MM AT LEW TPi= I A55E5 OF A VIBRATORY PZUJR. OK AS ADDITIONALLY MMED To ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED 9UBGRADE DIINSfEY. PAYING CONTRACTOR 511ALL MAKE MINOR ADJU57MEH75 IN CAME OF ME MATERIALS TO ASSUK E P MVJE DRAINAGE OP ALL POINTS oN Ti1E Lar WrTNOUF CTAT SPOTS, INRODATHS, E7rc. PRIOR TO CURBING. AGGREGATE PLACEIA +Ir, AND BITUMINOUS PAVING, PARKING AREAS SMALL E It PROOF ROILED WITH HEAVY KUBBERTIRED M1LY LOADED TANDEM AXIL DUMP TRUCK IN THE PRME.NCE OF7HE GF:OMH NICAL SCIE "5T TO 1 0iATE AND CAV5I=THE RIWOVAL OF SDFr, L00.5EMEWING 50115• BITUMIJKOUS BASE COUR5Z. MNDOFr 233 L, Tft 3 iB fi WM :N TACK COAT.- CONFORM TO MNDOIT 2357 ZMTUMINOU5 WEAR COURSE.- MNDOT 2331. TYPE 41 A BITUMINOUS PAVING3 G' CLASH 5. iOra'16 CRUSHED I IIAESTONE� 14121 MASE COURSE, I -112' WEAR C0UR5F- PAK NNG LOT STMFING: WHiTE W r1i BWt:RMZ M11T1=WUICAP MAKKINGS. FINAL- R0iUNG SHALL BE DONE WiM A STE2,WHM ROLLER CON17INUOU5LY UNTIL ALL RUC UM MAI Z ARE 19JMINATS?_ CARR 5HQUID B1' TAKEN TO FRCn= ADJACJEW CONC = FINISMS FROM DAMIUC'E OK SMEAR1N9. ERECT BARRICADC5 TO PFOTECT PAVING NWM TRAF177C UNTIL h+iOMIRe HA5 ODDLEi7 ANE) ATTAINED SUMCIDU HARDN= TO MTH5TAND 7RAftTC• CURB TAPER DETAIL CDNCXM cam ANR GurFm D616 DC5101 J•' CURB TAnRTO BE O01457RUCI'M AT RADS Or ALL CM AND WTMtMT DO HOT OONNWT TL} IN P1AM QJKW. C05r 0r TVMM BE INCIDJ4!'TAL TO BG 12 DENGN CDWt 1= CUK5 AND C01M WNCft-M EIOUA" P CQNCF= Oil Am XWUMISTM rlum Wrm royyy��{c��xyo`'R TO Be vr" LASM T1900m rm Yudo nc amw 9= Fn IN wm i Be ga P14W DE CURB CUT rok PRAINAGI: PROM FRDPIMTIM. = VETAIL SHf.ET C:I.sj = w 5870 gc BG 12 CONCRETE CURB 4: GUTTER SCE nm rOK 01MV BIONS TO I3l X DF CM I/2'R �•= "�• •..ter „. . a BrFUMINDU5 PAWMENT 5ECnON .�, im Iamumous WEAK CMM ( >I)w Buu mm Cage all S QJI:i3 b. 100% CRB5HM MEET= 5UBGMZ pp bIC ;ifJt�B ��;0 MATIN INTIM bd"G Gtr OM CCNCREL€ X-GUTTEK RAMP BiT JMINQU3 UP 51DEWALK CURBING Df7AIL TO mwr 70P OP CURB WITHIN HANDICAP 5TALL5 rt>e : ]FAM OF AND AC=5 AISLE. , TAPIR 81TUMINOIi� BACK , AWtUM i IRALL 5f'lSL,S 81Dt'JNAlK DOWN WI ;N ADJACWr W.W.. Iqy .97ANDARD STALLS. t f TlrouToUP0 c4m. ALL i. i ALL G MTD PAVWG AS OCl' 0 51UMAL& - SR: SRC nm FOR i Be ga P14W DE CURB CUT rok PRAINAGI: PROM FRDPIMTIM. = VETAIL SHf.ET C:I.sj = w 5870 gc BG 12 CONCRETE CURB 4: GUTTER SCE nm rOK 01MV BIONS TO I3l X DF CM I/2'R �•= "�• •..ter „. . a BrFUMINDU5 PAWMENT 5ECnON .�, im Iamumous WEAK CMM ( >I)w Buu mm Cage all S QJI:i3 b. 100% CRB5HM MEET= 5UBGMZ pp bIC ;ifJt�B ��;0 MATIN INTIM bd"G Gtr OM CCNCREL€ X-GUTTEK VAMMSM RM 5= rtm rOR cm 1< GUrnR "U5 VARIM ' f TlrouToUP0 I9il D � PRf?SHDLI COiiWIL7tOlV ,il7Jlf13 MW5FACING a 0 515MDN Aro 1110 TO MATCH PitM OiF LOW TD ksATCH R O1V IjUe of CURS # Gumx Gii1 m r BRUl�iN01JS C uk a # Wnw GRAN laAT " PEii 9iRl�T 3ELiH1FQ \�rAm= mumNaw I. ii0A17'f =VAarYGUMAW 71>;q4t1LA =m0R5 Wii'i sw 0614!l.m We IKt9H. E. C N RACTiON JDM 511011 BE US me D5'fH Cr SLAM MATCH IN TO ao51ING CURB 4 GUTTPR RAMP t3ri MINIOU5 UP TO MEET TOP OF CURB WI HIN HANDICAP STARS AND ACS A15I E. TAPER INTUMINOU5 BAC) DOWN W IN ADJAG'tM 5TANDARD STALLS. TAPS BIPAIIW" Sm" - 7.51 CDNCRM Gi13 m 6`X6' #G 16n= WING >s m l DRIVEWAY ENTRANCe * x -GUTTER TACE of Gt1m - 8612 G11R1`! 0 pRrJ!�AG7 .• GUniSt 15' XADU5 inFi •• 17 -our CURB •if ,s• d i U61 FACE Or wrri t / I WXSFAQNG a D' SECTION A -A 1114H TO MATCH rFMr OF Low 30 MATCH now L IE IX WW MS AAAI (+<5 »e CURS GUiTQt GRADE �� CUR81 GUTt�i%ltl�D� FBTR8rSEC.Tipm I& I 8' TAFW= BdillbUt+t M TAJ'1rRrD 1a11iL1A61 M0� 15 APpROti/� B=OH 5 IDI1 mm DRIVEWAY 110T15i 7.5' COtiCRJ•TG c4itim I . RUNFO= VALID' GUM AN D TRIAAIdIAAR Ll 4' CIASS 5 OAM 5iiGrKM UVI1iI GW #C WMM VAPI W%H. W 1(6' /6 *UVW MX MMH 2- CONIVACtM JQINO 5kWL W 113 TTM DEPTH Or" AD. DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE 4 COmCP w x•c1unvR (SM DETAIL) MATCH INTO "k 15TING GRADIS V Z lit I her ovbfy UTA Hun FL-"• '4%wAc$bm a report sw rmpamd ty wa or trAw fty drx>* owcmeam Ord #vt I am c1hy t.naiDW Prokwanal rhigrar wndw tha Ire of the 5tota of M TJl,ol,e JP. Data 50 4)17 It". No. 6218 Tho draeww"t is by loam Dlniirq 417walormant, Ina MBO) ■rd �roZndMcd mM I reomutim mtauw for um by mw "=Lmd only. Awddcwm cr dstniwgon of ties doammt or mkrrwbm carbw-Ad harem, Ir,1 nA pncr wnttm ocriw t of NM a G ALL RIGHT'S RESERVED p4 z 0 C192 LEGEND (PIROP05ED) BACK Or CURB (EXISTING) 10 10 5mrrw5I= OTIM 1,`-,�,p� �{C Qty `- "�� '• f '` `T lYifllMAL AS ■ Ll\ SPECS urr UNE: 1010 op - STORM 5Eilym IP tim V 5AN(TARY_-CM:R (� 1-1-1- WATommmm" -I • 'mt BPTrDM CF THE TRENCH 5TO)wSrm= # CLEMOUP IPEzn 6' VIA. MH 3' BEHIND BACK OF CURB WATMNWR (E)O CATCH aA504 (MM - SANITARY MANffM2 (DQ GATE VALVE (PRM f .4 - � d -; CATC,1 OPSIN [OO PRE -CAST CONCREIE SL45. A. HYDRANT = I C}R COPOLYMEK POSY PLASTIC. GATZ VJhLW = ALL MINT$ IN MH WI IL HAVi~ RLUi3 M d TELEMiONE R15M ■ �' 7YF. ', ELECrRic Mm ; ALL DOG HOU51!5 5HALL BE GRourm UNDED:1. MUND GA5 5IGN \D-'[i!i"l.i4J.'/. :./'`. •.: ';;-.-• I ISL/, V./.j/ '.~• z:�Z: nYv .r.?. -.•-•tet :.. ;.�4::�i BITUM,NOL 5 5URFACE Lf�.;; ;y ;.:;4 :- A:r �.';s�=: CONCRE SURfAa MSTING MWMINOU5 9UVXA(;t . - EXISTING GONCRM Q 20 40 60 °:, SURFACE GRAPHIC SCALE IN GENERAL CONSTRLJCTIOhl NOTES I - FOTi1OLE TO Vt7 fy THE POSMON5 OF =STING UNDERGROUND PACIUM-5 AT A 9LIMCIE:NT NUMUM Of LOCATEONl5 IN OR= TO A59URE THAT NO CONFLICT W" THE PROPMED WORK MOM AND THAT SUMCIEN ' CLEARANCE 15 AVAI I.Mr. 2.ADIUST ALL CURB 510M, VALVE_ BOXE5, MMNTCNMCE HOLE CA5TINIGS. CATCH UkM CABTIMG9, CLEANOLtr COVM5, AND 51MI AK ITIM5 TO PINME D GRADE. 3.1N5TALL All PIPE WITH THF ASTM IDEN'flr icKnON NUM13CM ON THE TOE' FOR W5r=ON. COMMENCE PIPE LAYING AT THE. LCrM5T PONT IN THTC PIOIOOED 5EWE K I INE. LAYTHI_ PIPE WTTTi THF_ BELL. END Ott M71VING GPOOVE EWD QFTtlt FIPT'_ POINTING UPGRADE. WHEN CONNECTING To AN E CSTING PFPe. UNCOVERT"f! fM5TENG PIPE IN ORDER TO ALLOW ANYADALr5TME=NIS IN THIS PROP05M UNE AND GRADE BEFORE IA1'9N S ANY PIPE. 4.CON5TRuCT SANITARY 5WE>z,. WA7El JyiAIn. AND STORM SEWER UTIUTIES IN ACCORQANCI= WITH THE CrTY E NGINlL` 5 A5_cKX ATrvN OF MINNESOTA STANDARID 5PECJRCATIONS 55MONS 2600E 2611. AND 2621 DATED 1999, OR TYLE LATEST W45M MMON. WATER DrMMLIiEON SYBTfM I.57ARA7ION OP WATER AND 5 CONSTRUCT 5VMAND WA'TE K 5ERVICE5 IN ACCORDANCE* W ITI MINNt� MA RULE9. PART 4715.17 10. SU13FAKr 2. PROVIDE A MINIMUM SEPARAVOR OF 18 INCHM AT ALL MATER LINE AND 5EWE K LINE CRO55ING5. R- WATfRMAIN DEPTH: MAINTAIN 6 fief OF COVER OVETZTHE TOP Or THE WATER LINES TO THE FIN15HED GRATE. VERIFY ELEVA110N OP PWPOSE D AND EXISTING WATER UNE5 AT ALL UTWY CRO551NG5. I95TALLTEIE WATER TINES AT GRrATE K DEPTHS IN ORDERTO SEAR STORM SE WER% WrTARY 5T51 .OROTTiIR UTIUTIIS A5 REQUIRED. INrCL UDE COST5 TO L04tir>:R WATER LIMES IN TNI° BABE BID. S.DISINFECT'ION: D151NFECT AIL COMPLEFM WATE.RMAINS IN ACMRUANCF. WITH AWWA 5TANDARD 0651. IF THE TABLET OR HTINU L FEM MrITIODS ARE USED, lDIS[NffCT USING WATER THAT 0011TAINS AT LEMT 50 PPM aF AMLABIL CtROFANE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNE50TA RULES, FART 4715, 2250, RETAIN THE TREATED WATE K IN THE PIPMNE FOR AT LEAST 2411OUR5. MMURe W CHIORINI' P251DUAL AT THE FND Or TiiT'_ 24 HOUk PERIOD, THF FREE CliLDRINE' FMIDUAL MUST BE AT UMST 10 M GSL MEASURED AT ANY POINT IN THE: LINE. Ir MUKWENr OF THE CHL.OWNlE CONCUMT1014 AT REGULAR INTERVALS 5HALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WTI Ti STANDARD MMOM. AWWA M-12.OR U51NG APPROPRIATE= GEIL OR "TE5T KIT5. 4.Tf5TING. PR93U liE TEST AND P!`MftM BACTERIOLOGICAL TE979 ON All WAM LINES E?NO E 5U PLR i11 PilRRVisION aI=TLi>s ��� CITY PUBLIC G Y1fVlStlE)Er KT I9f�. Mwra wyTii THE CITY AT LEAST 24 W01rKING 11Di1EC5 E'R1Q TZ TO ANY 715TING. nx PRF -5.5U wn THE WATERLJNI: TO 1 034-rfO i I50•"d GAUGE PRESSURE'_ (MEASURED AT THE POINT QF LOWEST ItfVATION) BY M,EPIIB OF A PUMF CONNF= TO THE PIE IH A SATISFACTORY MANNER. EUEA1trITAIN THE TEST f'RE55LJRE FOR a M1N1MU M of 2 HOURS. DQ NOT ADD wATExTo THE WAIDWAIN IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE REQUIRCD PM5uRE DURING THE V/ATFL MAIN PREa33i7RE° T TING. TH E TEF5T 5LOnDN OF PIPE 15 ACCEPTAME WITH A PRESSURE DROP OF 14 kPa (2 psi) OR LF55. 5. USE CLA55 52 DUCTILE IRON Pllt (DIP) WITII MM -ON JOINT3 PQR ALL Q IF WATfKMAIN. G. USE ONLYSTAMLE;.55 53tfL DOLTS AND NUTS ON ALL WATERMAIN ffMNG5, VALVES. AND HYDRAW5. 7. USE MPCHMI[CAL JOINT gffrMNT OE1Rt M FGR JOINT MTRA W ON ALL WATE omm BEND5 HAVING A VE"CAL OR HORIZONTAL WLECIIION OF 22-112 DEGRIS OROMWI:R, ALL VALVES, STUBS. aIMUON55. TM% CROSSES. I'LLICS, ALL HYDMNT VALVES, AND ALL hYDitAKI;3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY RDQUIREMEM. USE SMIES 1100 M551ALLIV MANUFACTURM BY MAA IRON INC.. CA5TIAND. TOM, OR APPROVED E5UAL, INSTAI.U1`D IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURM5 R OMM DATIONS POttMTRAINT ON DUCTILE IRON PIPE. B -AT ALL VALVE LOCAMONS WH1CIi RMIRf4 A 12'09 5MAUZR VALVE, IN5T'ALL GATE VALVES WHICH ARE Or'Mf COM"X55(DN RE51 INT 5f.ATE:D M) TYPE. USE AMERICAN FLOW CONTROLS 517RIM 2500 DULiaLE =N RE°SAI 24T WEDGE GAIT° VAL-VE:, A5T At18 OR AFMOVED EQUAL GATE VALVES SHALL CONrO M TO AWWA 0503. IN5TALL CAST [RIDN VAI -VE BONM CQNIF+ORMING TO WGO-G WITH NO. G Mr, OR C•QUIVALE NT. VALVE BOM 5T1AU. HAVE AT T EA5T W OF ADJUSTMENT ABOVE AND BELOW 11 N15ME D GRADE. DROF COVE= 3 ON VALVE Bo= 511ALL M XOUHD AND MR TIiF WOOD WATER` CAST ON THE TOP, USE T&M G5QD� �51AnW COVERS WITH MENDED 5FJRT. OREQUIVALENT: S.FJRE t•IYDRANNT3 SKRU-5E IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RMUIMLEMENT9 OFTHE LOCAL MUNICIPALRY DD NOT C0NNf! THY€ RMr I)RAIN5 70 3AN17FARY 515 ER.5 OR STORM 5!R5. DO NOT LOCATE HYDRAM 5 WRTiI N 10 FEErr OF 5ANITARY 51 WEBS OR STORM SES • WHEN F'IACING FIRE HYDRANT 5 IN WC.A110145 WHW THE GROUNDWATER TAM 15 L55 THAN b FEET BELOW THE GROUND 5URFICE, PLUG 7HE MURANT DRAIN HOLIES AND EQUIP THE HVDF.4M WYM A TAG STATING THE NEM FOR PULER PING AFTER U5E. CATCH DA51N 5CHEOU1f 035-1, 48' PRFCA:5T. NEENAH R• -30G7 CA5TJNG C5-2. 4& PRJ'CAST, NfENAH R 3067-C CA5TING 5TANDARD 451 CATCH BA51N t4' VARIES DIP t RCP PIPE 13EDDING DETAIL DO BACK Or CURB rel = i COMPACTED PTEI a�Ti 1,`-,�,p� �{C Qty `- "�� '• f '` `T lYifllMAL AS ■ Ll\ SPECS 1 MMEt+ MON FROM C&M OF STIWCTURJ` WROVED EQUAL) CtVM ALL CLEANC}UT9. TO BACK OF CURE, UND15TURDW 5UL }3 ' 4' DIA. MH 9' IN M DNT BACK Of CURD -I • 'mt BPTrDM CF THE TRENCH 5' DIA. Mi a' IN rWNT Wr,OF CURD 12 Do 5HAM 13E 5HAPED To FIT TriE 6' VIA. MH 3' BEHIND BACK OF CURB PIPIT BARREL FOR AT L.EA57 5091. 7' ID[A. MH s' Sf IND BACK Of CURS, - 61SEE MOMABOVJ= DIAMI=TER 5i1A1L NOT bf E 538 THAN 48 IKCtiES. 5 f .4 - � d -; -ME N&LION FOUNDRY CO. W 1 C42 CASTING W M 513P -•SEALING, SOLID, TYPE B IlD, OR APPROVT3D MUAL, ON ALL 9At MAKY SISYM MANHOL115. CDVEKSStIArLL S K Ttil<'SAMTARY 5C1r M LAaF_. I PRE -CAST CONCREIE SL45. A. - MANHOLE STT• 5 161 O.C. ALUMINUM I C}R COPOLYMEK POSY PLASTIC. 4 ALL MINT$ IN MH WI IL HAVi~ RLUi3 M t{; �.' GA5KEF'5 ■ �' 7YF. ', r ; ALL DOG HOU51!5 5HALL BE GRourm IN51DE AND OUf5ID= DIP t RCP PIPE 13EDDING DETAIL DO - rel = i COMPACTED PTEI a�Ti 1,`-,�,p� �{C Qty `- "�� '• f '` `T lYifllMAL AS ■ Ll\ SPECS (N LINE CLEMOUT WROVED EQUAL) CtVM ALL CLEANC}UT9. ti UND15TURDW 5UL }3 k -I • 'mt BPTrDM CF THE TRENCH PRINTED 12 Do 5HAM 13E 5HAPED To FIT TriE 4'.Tm " PIPIT BARREL FOR AT L.EA57 5091. FiN19HE5) GEiADi: OF THE OLIMaE >r'1PP DIAMEUR PWC * HDPE PAPE SF-DDING DETAIL. / Y 12-0 MIN:� r f. : .J IV MIN F f r, �rr•.i COMPACTED GRAN1ULAK F.AEGA5nlIENT MATERIAL (MNDOT SPEC 51+45) 46m CATCH BA51N 1N CURB CUT 77. SANITARY SE11i M FAt;.E CSI= ; + :: � * : , - : =: t EACK OF Cu '. '• a CURB . E'IPE USE 50Lfl I-C]L?RZ. 3GiWuLr- 40, A57'M 02665 F+O1.WtM ct'TE:c7wDE tPYc.? MA571C PIPE- FOR nEx3[GNiATIrD PVC SANITARY 5wR5 6 INCK15 IN DIAMM OR LE59. U-91` 50LID-LORE, A5TM V3034 PSM {POLY VIN1'E_ CHLOADq (FVC} FIFE FOR DMGNA•iED PVC ' .Z. 9ANMARY 51:MMS 5 INGHF5 70 15 INCKM IN DIAMEns JOINTS FOR, ALL 5ANITARY 5EWER MAINS 511ALL HAVE PUSH -0H JOINTS WTTH r MA5T0MMUC GA 5XM. USF- OF SOLVENT CWE NT JOINT515 A11J7W>r:F7 MR BUILDING 5MVIC.ES. 5OLVENT C.'U&ENT JOTNTS IN PVC FIFE MIDST INCLUDE USE= OP A PRIMErR WHICH 13 OF CONI ,45TING COLORTO ME FIFE AND CEMDM IN ACCORDANCEMM MINNEOTA FACE OFr e�4CK OJs RUL>:�9. FART 4715.08 10, SUIWART 2. PTFE WFiTL SDL.VEt,17 { I�+IENr JOINTS 5f TALI BE JOiNI VrrTli WC CE NICHT CONFORM NG To CURS ASTM V256+F IM%TALL Pve- PETE ON A GTiANULAW P r -n IN ,&Lw --F WTrIi ASTM D2 CURB • 23 I . 2. CLEAENOUTS• • INSTALL CLEANOU'E'3 ON ALL SAHTrAKY 9BV'K 9LsRVICTS IN ACCORDANCE iNCTFi MINNf=50TA RULP3 PART 4715.1010. Tlii: ppim =95Xu` ,, :;, �• ;',; INSTALL NEW STORM PIPE .Ar IDLE. -954,47 TQ .. / f =-$• " fF? ;` . RI9TAHCI= BEFW= C LEAWAR5 IN E'fC)MONTAL PIPING SHALL NOT gt= r50 FEET FOR MME 55 44NCH AND OVE K IN SCID=. CLFAHOUT3 � , b SHALL BE OF THF SAME NOMINAL ME AS THE PiFE5 THEY 5ERVL'. IN5TAlL A MEr'tR ISM FRAME AND SOUD UD (NE19M R 19 I4 & OR (N LINE CLEMOUT WROVED EQUAL) CtVM ALL CLEANC}UT9. - 3.75TING. PRE55URf TEST ALL 5ANITARY 515M UNE~5 IN ACCORQANCE WITH -RIE MI UM!50rA KULr5 PART x#715.2820. TEST ALL PLEXI EFSAUTARY510M UNF5 FOR QEfleECTtON AFTER. THE SEWER UNE HAS 13= IN5TAUM AND BACMIL HAS &ESN IN MAa FOIA k AT LPA5T SO DAYS. NO FLPE 51if4[L EX= A DFJFIF=0N OF 5%. IF TM TE5T FAILS, W.KtNI5Cff0SAWWAJKr3 AND RJrTI-5T, PRINTED 4-UNLIM3 OTHERWISt INDICATED. USE RITINFORf•,ED, PRECAST. CONCRETE MANKOLE 5 CORPORMING To ASTM Cf478, FURNISKM WITH PKW ST BASM. 5ANMARY 5t'= MANHOLES 5HALL DE 5UFMED WTE71 FRE: FC*AEU INVERT5 AND FLEMERE N I50MNF_ 5LEEVE 4'.Tm " CONNECTION5 MR ALL LATERAL- LINES 15 INCHES IN DIAMETEK OR LE55, UNl E55 UPtiFI€VASt! [NE7IEvATE D. JOINTS POR ALL PRP -CAST FiN19HE5) GEiADi: MMIIOl15 SECTIONS 5HALL HAVE CONFINED, RU 'fr-RING GASKE IM IN ACCOF.DANCZ Wei ASTM M23, Ti IN510E WM DIAMI=TER 5i1A1L NOT bf E 538 THAN 48 IKCtiES. 5 f .4 - � d -; -ME N&LION FOUNDRY CO. W 1 C42 CASTING W M 513P -•SEALING, SOLID, TYPE B IlD, OR APPROVT3D MUAL, ON ALL 9At MAKY SISYM MANHOL115. CDVEKSStIArLL S K Ttil<'SAMTARY 5C1r M LAaF_. I • - ' ' I e. - INS UE+fTAJ.L CURB GUY .$0 _ 'UNDIST11RDd`D L WATER CMN' DRAW FR'Q11F ,3. CBL -Z:... 4061-957.53 _ J •. WV �W%•9 .85 �� r0ffx Wit, i Y• - r I /r i ti 1 / f % j'ff O�L PAll I• +'J/��r ' •�+,+ :r�: , . l �. J'f 'kr ! •«INK.Irl. t� -STs -we - lip 4 , aiia tt ,� ,, ��- "'`?�,:c�- fir-��•-. ' /, / PRE -CAST CONCRETE= SLAB. ppim =95Xu` ,, :;, �• ;',; INSTALL NEW STORM PIPE .Ar IDLE. -954,47 TQ .. / f =-$• " fF? ;` . MANHOLE 5TEP3 Igo O.O. ATJ,IMINUM OR COPOLYMER -'•�'�t 1' I i AvnIE� 1c7pS7tNG SRJB � POLY PLAgiIC. (N LINE CLEMOUT GATE VALUE DETAIL DOG HOUsl SHALL BE GGROUTED. [N_ 117E C� 7D USE V COPAVIATM PRINTED J;.r. My+4�N�[�T�AtN MINIMUM =' "` FiN19HE5) GEiADi: ON zx f�:.::• PLUG AND CAP v-_ir g�_�•j• -: is j�-'.ate t{; �.' OCG NOTE: CLEANO[!r CISP cillImOUT RISER CAP 5NALLai= WMi THEEM) BRA58 MINNEAP0115 PLUG U5P 422 OR fOUAL ��.,':'.-':.::<a::'. :•••' STANDARD. p�� )fin �` ! •C FW I... •- NJJ��IfYB ' ',"fY •'.} It - "_'~.+' !►J VARIE5 .la VALVE! I30x 3 Pl�rs, MIH 6.0 COVER 112' RU130M GASKET' NNIE98 OTHERW= 4' VfWCAL. WYE (FVC) IN5TAU D BETvvE:>rN NESTED) THE GATE VALVEc AND 115 BEND GATE VALVE ADAPTOR 2000 P31 OaNCr�TE E1VCA9�+EFNT tIV gam• VALVE 12' ALL AR[?UND QI+lCEDLNTALj 8(3X ADAPTOR W'ITIi wATaz1161iT GA51cL�T 1/2 CU. W. GRAVEL PI�7TECTiVC C'OATI[�G A5 MANUFACTURM • ;' OKCfMEN1= PLUG l3'f' ADAPTOR INC. QR APPKD= EQUAL l'vC: iIOREZOWAL Mr WVC) N 7tiltU5T BLiDmNG roR MEANING mulpmwr INS UE+fTAJ.L CURB GUY .$0 _ 'UNDIST11RDd`D L WATER CMN' DRAW FR'Q11F ,3. CBL -Z:... 4061-957.53 _ J •. WV �W%•9 .85 �� r0ffx Wit, i Y• - r I /r i ti 1 / f % j'ff O�L PAll I• +'J/��r ' •�+,+ :r�: , . l �. J'f 'kr ! •«INK.Irl. t� -STs -we - lip 4 , aiia tt ,� ,, ��- "'`?�,:c�- fir-��•-. ' /, / PRE -CAST CONCRETE= SLAB. ppim =95Xu` ,, :;, �• ;',; INSTALL NEW STORM PIPE .Ar IDLE. -954,47 TQ .. / f =-$• " fF? ;` . MANHOLE 5TEP3 Igo O.O. ATJ,IMINUM OR COPOLYMER -'•�'�t 1' I i AvnIE� 1c7pS7tNG SRJB � POLY PLAgiIC. � =' ' ,,,��`-�,_ �' - � 8'* ALL JO1NT5 IN MH WILL HAVE FJMER GAStCeT's ALL .`'tet L>�; { TqQ DOG HOUsl SHALL BE GGROUTED. [N_ 117E C� 7D AN fir£ ' J;.r. My+4�N�[�T�AtN MINIMUM O COVE S M WA'rfRAb4 - UNLESS TKATH•---� � WATERIA4IN GA7r VALVA Nom: IF GATE VALVE BOXES ARE MENDED. THM 5 MALL BE A GATE VALVE NUT b(TENS(ON TO MMIN 7,5'0? FINISHED GRADE 1 herd certly th•t t#>ss ptruti spea?s�' orrarod yea pWaire d by ma or under rry WM' CONTRACTOR SHALL i � �,� rm E'S's}ISGtl Ui1�Ct ft Ln" of tha INVERT ELEVAMNS, IF A".a1tote , "OR DISCREFANCIES EXIST, ENGIMEER SHMAD RF There P. t7,�e at14A7 Reg. Ido. �2 t 8 The ADo m nt a by "abm BW&ig 4 Poodopmaro, rrr. (N50) mi MANHCLF c0nt:jm2lm_" oonf denh•l RIM -959.12 aftsied t r m by Tw 1W. $N=95354 personnel oWy. A, f• dr cka re a IHV. OUr- FIELD VMFY dmotnbubon or a,+•s docwnwt or �rTonr,.bm oorii m d t&ft% womit , ■ print wrrttem �rt of N w, 0 EX. 52 -6 Cif SUV. prohr tem. S iliCE $ o ALL RIGHTS R.95ERVP.0 �.., (APPRQ)W'1E: LOC.AT7 :it ,ti •� • ••r Y.' x .4(k '_ �'- _G: �4� •a;�•` .•_\Y -tip: � ' , 4n•/� t �`� C1=' '}.:�•�;.�y�;�.'�:n,,�, tet• •�e'r - _ � � � firm.r' ;3- � • ,tom Com. tib• _ .,r:j.r•`- ti. ;fir,, �t STORES MUD -.NY-To- Co Sr' dh x �ip . EX67ING MANHOLE 1� j IW. -944.94 Clo3 GENERAL. NO -W5; i . A COPY OF THE 8WF", INCLUDING COPlk5 Of ALL INSPEC.`CO7N RZF0Z5, MM WISiON3 AND OT HIXA550CIATi-D ROCUMENT5. MU5T BE RETAINED ATT1111 FIRAIECT $ITE AT AILTIME;5 IDURJNG ODiV5TRucTION. 2. THE CONfRACrOl; MUST IDOMN AN ERDSTON CONTROL 5UpMV15UR WNO 5HALL 5t' ICNCIMj:DGEASI.E AND OMM= IN 111E APPLICATION OF M31ON PREVENTION MP 5>:1DIMtWT CONTROL U5T MANAGEMOIT PRACTICES. S. THE EROSION CONTROL SUPMVISOR WiLL WORK WITH THE PROJECT ENGINEER TO OYF BEE THE IMPLEMENTATION Or THE SWMT, AND THE I1415TAUAMON. MMTiON, AND MAINTi`MANCE Or THE ERDSION PREVMMON AND 5MMENT GOVT WL mrs wc1e AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. I!!RO5fON PREVENTION PRACTTC5: 4. ALL DOUSED SOIL AREA5 (IMC WDING STORM WATER POND SIDE 5LOPfS 0k EXP+03'ED 571Lc3WITH A Y0911VE SLOFE TO A STORM WATfk CONVr'_1'ANN) WrTh A CONTINUO1.15 Ft7BMVE 51.017E WTM ZW LINFAL FEET OF A 5URFACE WATER w57 HAVE TEMPO?JW AND PERMANCM' COVER FOR THE' EMOWD 501L ARfA9 YEAR, ROUND, ACCORDING TO THE TfOLL.OWING TABU; OF 5LOPE AND TIME IVAMf 5: 5LDFC5 71ME MAXIMUM! TIMID AN AREA 9FffftRTHAN 3.1 7 DAY5 CAN REMAIN OPEN WHEN rROM 10: I TO 3: i 14 DAYS TME AREA M NOT A nVAY nATRR THAN 10:1 21 DAYS A3ONGWOFAM. 5. THE NORMAL WETTED FMIMETER OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANfWT DRAINAGE DiTCHES WILL BE 5TA8LM WITHIN zw rT. FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE. OR POINT OF D15Cd1AR,GE. 5TABIL17ATION SHALL TSE t)DMftEl =D WiMIN 24 HOUX5 Of CONNECTION. G. PIPE OUTLET5 MUST BE PROVIDED MH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY 131551PATION W MIN 24 HOURS Or CONNSCTiON TO A 5URFACE WATM 5PDIrw W CONTROL PRACTICE5:. 7. KOCK E4TRIINCE510M 5HALL DE INDTALLEa TO MINIM1ze vEtIICLE TRACKING or SEL31MENr rKlo +1 THE CON5TRUCTION SITE=. 57kftT 5WWING SHALL BE USED IF THE ROCK ENTMCEWOM ARE NOT ADMUATETO PRUNE 5EDIMM FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO MT 5TRELT 8. 5ED1MMr CONML MtACTICE5 SHALL Uf! ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN 61tAflJ W FMIA TFFS BEFORE ANY UP GRADIRIr LANIT DI97Uit131NG ACM"155 13MR. 9. TEMPORARY 5CELST0CKPIU5 WMi HAVE 5ft)IMW CON I.S. AND MLL NOT BE PLACM 1N STORM WATER CONVEYANCES OR SURFACE WATMS. 10. ALL SIORMI DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE PROTE= BYAFMOPRMATE MPS DURING CONSTRUCTION ION UNTIL ALL SOURCM WITH POTENTIAL POR DISCHIARGING TO THE INLET HAVE OMI 5TABILIZED. 11. IF 14 ACKES OR MOKE OfDISTURBED 501L.15 DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCAMON, A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT MUN 15 RE-QUIRIED. IF Til W R A 5PeGTAf.. WATER OR IMPAIRED WATER WITHIN Jj MJ LE AND iT 15 REGUVA NG KUKOFF TiiEN 5 AGRE5 OR MORE OF EN51VWW SOIL 15 DKNNING TO A COMMON LOCATION REQUME5 A TEMFORAKY BEDIMI=NT WIN. =5I0N 4 5MIMENT' C( NIML 5MUD+1C3lNG: 12. 5ILT FENCE, GON5TRUCT]Oi,E ENTRANCE. ANDIIOR OTHER 5UITABLE I MMUM F.#W510H CONTROL MFA5URP5 5hAU. i3E IN55TA .ED PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY GRADING OR LAND DISTURBING ACi1VITY. 13. TOPSOIL STOCKPILED WALL ISE STD= ON 9iTE AND AVAILAW FORTAie HOMfBBLUILDfX TEMPORARY 5TAI31112ATIC?N SHALL BE 125TA51.15HED BY51W AND MULCI I. AND ER05ION CONTROL 131ANXET AS SP15CIMED IN THE PLAN 911EEM PRIOR TO 51,15MITTAL OF THE MPCA PEKMTFTRAN5FFRl "iFIG4i OR FORM SUBMITTAL 14. THE 5UIL= 511AIL IN51AUL A C0145TRUCTION fWRANCE AND ADEQUATE PMMrfn5t 5=10N CONTROL ON ALL DOWNGRADIW SLOP» PRIOR3O LANiD DISTURBING ACTIVITY AS INOICATED ON PL.AN5. DEWATMNG AND SIN! DIMMING: 15. PRWATERIUG 09 D 51N DRAINING ACfi ni 5 or T1AwID OR sMMW LADEW WATER SHALL BE D15C'KWZED TO A TrMPORARY Olt PERJti ANW 5EDIM1W AION BASIN OR TREATED WTrH T11E APPROPRIATE BMF F'RJORTO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATEIL a iERV D1551PATION 51IALI- BE PROVIDED AT ALL D15CHWE POINT. DEWATMNG OR BASIN DRAINING ACTTVI'TiIES SHALL NOT CAW E NUISANCE CONDITIONS. EROSION IN RCEIULN+tG CHANNELS OK ON DOW16LOM PROP13ME5, OR ADVIMEL.Y IMPACT WETLAND5. POLLUTION FRE=VfWON MANAGEMENT' MEA5URF5: I G. SOLID WASTE COLLECTM 5EDIMEW. A5PHALTAND CCWC 9nT M]LUNG5. F10ATING DEM9. PAPER PLASTIC, FABPdC. CON5TRUCTIOR AND DEMOLITION DIMM AND O?HER WA5T1E3 511ALL BE D15P05ID OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY MTJi MPGA DMF05AL REGUIREiAEN T5. 17. HAZA VOl13 MATERIAIs: Olt, GA90LM, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS 505TAI,ECES 5HALL BE F'ROPMY 3TOM, INCLUDING 56MNDAKY CONTaRRENT, TO PKEVENT SPILLS. I.IrAK.5 OR OTHER DI5CHARG1 Rf5TRICTED ACCESS TO STORAa ARIAS MUST 131^ PRO°VIDW TO PR VFW VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF MAiAK OLIS WA5TE MUST BE IN COMPUANcr WITH M?CA RI=GLILATIOW. 18. SAL WA5HJNEG OF TRUCK5 AND OTHER CONSTRLICTrON VA:rAICUS NEMS TO BE LIMITED TO A DEFlN D AREA LSP THE BUT. RUNOfT N=5 TO BE CONT'AINM AND WASTE POP05M OF MXTRL.Y. iN5FrcnON AND MAINTENANCE.- IS- AINT NANCE:IS- 1N5A'=ON5 5KAW BE CONDUCTS ONCE EVERY S&EN DAYS DLIJUNG ACTIVE C:+ON5TRU TION AND MUM 24 HOUR5 ARIBA MNFAIL EVIN GMTERTHMr A INCH 1N 24 MOM, 20. (N5P=ON5 AMD MAINTEMMICE PICORDS SHALL BE KEYAINED ON SrM WITH THE SWEEP. 21. ALL INI9LTRATION AKKA5 5HALL BE 1N5Pi3 110 TO ENSURE THAT NO 5H)IMENT FKOM ONGOING CrON5TRJ.JCIAON AC1iVME515 KWHiNG THE IMMI.TRAMON ARA AND THME AREAS ARE PRa3ECTE'D FROM COMPACTION DUE TO rrON5TRUCTION EQUIPMW DMING AC RO= TETE INPiLTRATIO N AREA. 22. STAIMUM AKFAS SHALL If INSPECT) ONCE PM MOWN. ftM WORK HA5 5= 5U5FZ!NDPD DUE= TO STI GROUND CONDIi ION5. IN5J'ECTiONS AND MAIN E31 MCE WILL TAKE PLACE AS SOON A5 RU NOFr 000URS AT THE SIR Olt Molt 10 REDUMING CON5TRUCTiON. WHIC#ii: M COMES MR5T. 23. ALL. 5ILT FUNGI! MUST BE iiE?AI1;M RR'I.A,CEDD, OR3UPMJ!MENTW WHEN THE BECOME NDNRICT10iZAt OKI -HE 9FAIMMT RiEACHESA OF Til£ H=hT OF TME FENCE. TiiE5E RfPAIR;5 MUST BE MADE WTTHIN 24 HOURS OF V5DOYtRY. OR AS SOON AS nELD CaON97RUCrON AUJ765 ACCE59. 24. TEMPORAIKYAND PERMANENTSURMENTATION DA:51145 MUST TSE DRAINtV ANDT11E SEDIMtNf FiMOVFD WHEN THE DEPTH OF THE 5EDIMENi COU -EC= IN THE BA51N REACHES Jz THE STORAGE VOLUME. VM WE AND RMADVAL MUST 8E COMPLETED MFtiIN 72 HOURS OF 0ZWVEkY, MAS SOON AS naD C ON ITION5 M WAC=5. 25. CONSTRUCTION SITE VMICLE EXIT L,OCAIPON5 SMALL BE I1451*15= rM EVIDI OF OFF -5M 5MMfNT IRACKI NG ONTO FAVW 8URFIA . TRAM OWIMENr MOT 09 NNOM MM AL, QFMITr PAVW DAMAM DAM!WiMI N F4 MUM QF 0I800M. EROSION CONTROL 5ILT FACE RIZOMM ENDED CM 5TRFNGTH F1LTEIR STOF.#4r HT. FABRJC N=ED MKOUr WAKM15H 5UPPW PONDING FIT. STEEL OR WOOD P05T I N + f0 FT MAX SPACING MM GRAVEL W9IE SUFFOi�T PR�iCC G FT M" SPACING WITHOUT ALTERNATE DETAIL WIRE 5UPPM I=f?= TRENCH WTTH GRAVEL OVERLAP GEoTwnLE FABRIC 0 AND F=ASTEN AT Z'WTERVAI.5 zT7' L! DIRECTION OF iiUNOrr 1` IDW z_ ? EJtiEIV D WIPE b ME51"! INTO ai TRENCH SILT FENCE - HEAVY DUTY 5TP.EL. T 57VOM POST 5' MiN. LENGTii AT 13' MAX. SPACING _ WIRE 11 I=H RONFOri Mt:NT' -GMTFXTILE FABRIC PABRJC ANCHORAGE -TIUNCH BACKMtL %VM IN. Lt.RD91ON CONTROL NOTES: R= ColisndxIt" EMFAlI Z -PZKX C0N5TWJL1M Ati WN =i 5 L BE ItR3MUM PRIOR TO ANY &M MAOM 7Tit9t t't[LRAg= WALL BEMAN?'AINB} UM MAI GRADiNd 15 CCAMMZM 5mim 7U %IUFW ARDS SKAU BE BMW w" N"in HUMPM 5M f'�G hdl�i' 3A76 OR SppQSp _wc)qLU0N @CAJNNTFIX 5"L PC PLt+CW CH ALL SUITS a: f Ok CrMTW. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL IiAltD 5URFACE r PUBUC ROAD f� 5I1T FfXCE N(M: 1. SILT ft -N= SHALL Br INSTAL w Ilam ANY M&VATING. 2, IN5PI= AND REPAIR FENCE AFFER EACH. STORM dill AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN Nccc5.sw. 3. PJMOVED 5>DIMENT SHALL BE DPWC)E3= TO AN ARBA THAT YA LL NOT CORMBUTE SED1MEW Of -SITE AND CAN M pl:FiMADIUIil.Y 5TAI3NLIIED. #. SNIT r&CC SHALL BE PLACED 0" 5LOM CONTOUK5 TO MAX)MIZ PONDING EFFICIENCY. 2512' MOD K*T #' HILA. LENGTH AT #' MAX. SPACING GOOTD(TILE FAMC FAMC AtiCKCRAGA DItU:CT CN OF TMCH BACKFILL %" RUNO" TAMPW NA'Ti.JRAL "L �n MEN. i� SILT FENCE - PREA55EM15LF-0 LEGEND LOT LINT! SILT nwcz 5TORM Sfl fk - fT CATCH BASIN 0 STORM MANKOIE ITUMINOW 5URPACr- a •. FROPMED { _ , r- j ,: CONCRM SUWACE 11505TING NWMINOU5A) 5URFACE �davlti • -;• ,- 1X15TING CONCRETESURFALZ 0 20 60 At GRAP#11C Sar kE IN FEET GENERAL. NO -W5; i . A COPY OF THE 8WF", INCLUDING COPlk5 Of ALL INSPEC.`CO7N RZF0Z5, MM WISiON3 AND OT HIXA550CIATi-D ROCUMENT5. MU5T BE RETAINED ATT1111 FIRAIECT $ITE AT AILTIME;5 IDURJNG ODiV5TRucTION. 2. THE CONfRACrOl; MUST IDOMN AN ERDSTON CONTROL 5UpMV15UR WNO 5HALL 5t' ICNCIMj:DGEASI.E AND OMM= IN 111E APPLICATION OF M31ON PREVENTION MP 5>:1DIMtWT CONTROL U5T MANAGEMOIT PRACTICES. S. THE EROSION CONTROL SUPMVISOR WiLL WORK WITH THE PROJECT ENGINEER TO OYF BEE THE IMPLEMENTATION Or THE SWMT, AND THE I1415TAUAMON. MMTiON, AND MAINTi`MANCE Or THE ERDSION PREVMMON AND 5MMENT GOVT WL mrs wc1e AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. I!!RO5fON PREVENTION PRACTTC5: 4. ALL DOUSED SOIL AREA5 (IMC WDING STORM WATER POND SIDE 5LOPfS 0k EXP+03'ED 571Lc3WITH A Y0911VE SLOFE TO A STORM WATfk CONVr'_1'ANN) WrTh A CONTINUO1.15 Ft7BMVE 51.017E WTM ZW LINFAL FEET OF A 5URFACE WATER w57 HAVE TEMPO?JW AND PERMANCM' COVER FOR THE' EMOWD 501L ARfA9 YEAR, ROUND, ACCORDING TO THE TfOLL.OWING TABU; OF 5LOPE AND TIME IVAMf 5: 5LDFC5 71ME MAXIMUM! TIMID AN AREA 9FffftRTHAN 3.1 7 DAY5 CAN REMAIN OPEN WHEN rROM 10: I TO 3: i 14 DAYS TME AREA M NOT A nVAY nATRR THAN 10:1 21 DAYS A3ONGWOFAM. 5. THE NORMAL WETTED FMIMETER OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANfWT DRAINAGE DiTCHES WILL BE 5TA8LM WITHIN zw rT. FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE. OR POINT OF D15Cd1AR,GE. 5TABIL17ATION SHALL TSE t)DMftEl =D WiMIN 24 HOUX5 Of CONNECTION. G. PIPE OUTLET5 MUST BE PROVIDED MH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY 131551PATION W MIN 24 HOURS Or CONNSCTiON TO A 5URFACE WATM 5PDIrw W CONTROL PRACTICE5:. 7. KOCK E4TRIINCE510M 5HALL DE INDTALLEa TO MINIM1ze vEtIICLE TRACKING or SEL31MENr rKlo +1 THE CON5TRUCTION SITE=. 57kftT 5WWING SHALL BE USED IF THE ROCK ENTMCEWOM ARE NOT ADMUATETO PRUNE 5EDIMM FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO MT 5TRELT 8. 5ED1MMr CONML MtACTICE5 SHALL Uf! ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN 61tAflJ W FMIA TFFS BEFORE ANY UP GRADIRIr LANIT DI97Uit131NG ACM"155 13MR. 9. TEMPORARY 5CELST0CKPIU5 WMi HAVE 5ft)IMW CON I.S. AND MLL NOT BE PLACM 1N STORM WATER CONVEYANCES OR SURFACE WATMS. 10. ALL SIORMI DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE PROTE= BYAFMOPRMATE MPS DURING CONSTRUCTION ION UNTIL ALL SOURCM WITH POTENTIAL POR DISCHIARGING TO THE INLET HAVE OMI 5TABILIZED. 11. IF 14 ACKES OR MOKE OfDISTURBED 501L.15 DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCAMON, A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT MUN 15 RE-QUIRIED. IF Til W R A 5PeGTAf.. WATER OR IMPAIRED WATER WITHIN Jj MJ LE AND iT 15 REGUVA NG KUKOFF TiiEN 5 AGRE5 OR MORE OF EN51VWW SOIL 15 DKNNING TO A COMMON LOCATION REQUME5 A TEMFORAKY BEDIMI=NT WIN. =5I0N 4 5MIMENT' C( NIML 5MUD+1C3lNG: 12. 5ILT FENCE, GON5TRUCT]Oi,E ENTRANCE. ANDIIOR OTHER 5UITABLE I MMUM F.#W510H CONTROL MFA5URP5 5hAU. i3E IN55TA .ED PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY GRADING OR LAND DISTURBING ACi1VITY. 13. TOPSOIL STOCKPILED WALL ISE STD= ON 9iTE AND AVAILAW FORTAie HOMfBBLUILDfX TEMPORARY 5TAI31112ATIC?N SHALL BE 125TA51.15HED BY51W AND MULCI I. AND ER05ION CONTROL 131ANXET AS SP15CIMED IN THE PLAN 911EEM PRIOR TO 51,15MITTAL OF THE MPCA PEKMTFTRAN5FFRl "iFIG4i OR FORM SUBMITTAL 14. THE 5UIL= 511AIL IN51AUL A C0145TRUCTION fWRANCE AND ADEQUATE PMMrfn5t 5=10N CONTROL ON ALL DOWNGRADIW SLOP» PRIOR3O LANiD DISTURBING ACTIVITY AS INOICATED ON PL.AN5. DEWATMNG AND SIN! DIMMING: 15. PRWATERIUG 09 D 51N DRAINING ACfi ni 5 or T1AwID OR sMMW LADEW WATER SHALL BE D15C'KWZED TO A TrMPORARY Olt PERJti ANW 5EDIM1W AION BASIN OR TREATED WTrH T11E APPROPRIATE BMF F'RJORTO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATEIL a iERV D1551PATION 51IALI- BE PROVIDED AT ALL D15CHWE POINT. DEWATMNG OR BASIN DRAINING ACTTVI'TiIES SHALL NOT CAW E NUISANCE CONDITIONS. EROSION IN RCEIULN+tG CHANNELS OK ON DOW16LOM PROP13ME5, OR ADVIMEL.Y IMPACT WETLAND5. POLLUTION FRE=VfWON MANAGEMENT' MEA5URF5: I G. SOLID WASTE COLLECTM 5EDIMEW. A5PHALTAND CCWC 9nT M]LUNG5. F10ATING DEM9. PAPER PLASTIC, FABPdC. CON5TRUCTIOR AND DEMOLITION DIMM AND O?HER WA5T1E3 511ALL BE D15P05ID OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY MTJi MPGA DMF05AL REGUIREiAEN T5. 17. HAZA VOl13 MATERIAIs: Olt, GA90LM, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS 505TAI,ECES 5HALL BE F'ROPMY 3TOM, INCLUDING 56MNDAKY CONTaRRENT, TO PKEVENT SPILLS. I.IrAK.5 OR OTHER DI5CHARG1 Rf5TRICTED ACCESS TO STORAa ARIAS MUST 131^ PRO°VIDW TO PR VFW VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF MAiAK OLIS WA5TE MUST BE IN COMPUANcr WITH M?CA RI=GLILATIOW. 18. SAL WA5HJNEG OF TRUCK5 AND OTHER CONSTRLICTrON VA:rAICUS NEMS TO BE LIMITED TO A DEFlN D AREA LSP THE BUT. RUNOfT N=5 TO BE CONT'AINM AND WASTE POP05M OF MXTRL.Y. iN5FrcnON AND MAINTENANCE.- IS- AINT NANCE:IS- 1N5A'=ON5 5KAW BE CONDUCTS ONCE EVERY S&EN DAYS DLIJUNG ACTIVE C:+ON5TRU TION AND MUM 24 HOUR5 ARIBA MNFAIL EVIN GMTERTHMr A INCH 1N 24 MOM, 20. (N5P=ON5 AMD MAINTEMMICE PICORDS SHALL BE KEYAINED ON SrM WITH THE SWEEP. 21. ALL INI9LTRATION AKKA5 5HALL BE 1N5Pi3 110 TO ENSURE THAT NO 5H)IMENT FKOM ONGOING CrON5TRJ.JCIAON AC1iVME515 KWHiNG THE IMMI.TRAMON ARA AND THME AREAS ARE PRa3ECTE'D FROM COMPACTION DUE TO rrON5TRUCTION EQUIPMW DMING AC RO= TETE INPiLTRATIO N AREA. 22. STAIMUM AKFAS SHALL If INSPECT) ONCE PM MOWN. ftM WORK HA5 5= 5U5FZ!NDPD DUE= TO STI GROUND CONDIi ION5. IN5J'ECTiONS AND MAIN E31 MCE WILL TAKE PLACE AS SOON A5 RU NOFr 000URS AT THE SIR Olt Molt 10 REDUMING CON5TRUCTiON. WHIC#ii: M COMES MR5T. 23. ALL. 5ILT FUNGI! MUST BE iiE?AI1;M RR'I.A,CEDD, OR3UPMJ!MENTW WHEN THE BECOME NDNRICT10iZAt OKI -HE 9FAIMMT RiEACHESA OF Til£ H=hT OF TME FENCE. TiiE5E RfPAIR;5 MUST BE MADE WTTHIN 24 HOURS OF V5DOYtRY. OR AS SOON AS nELD CaON97RUCrON AUJ765 ACCE59. 24. TEMPORAIKYAND PERMANENTSURMENTATION DA:51145 MUST TSE DRAINtV ANDT11E SEDIMtNf FiMOVFD WHEN THE DEPTH OF THE 5EDIMENi COU -EC= IN THE BA51N REACHES Jz THE STORAGE VOLUME. VM WE AND RMADVAL MUST 8E COMPLETED MFtiIN 72 HOURS OF 0ZWVEkY, MAS SOON AS naD C ON ITION5 M WAC=5. 25. CONSTRUCTION SITE VMICLE EXIT L,OCAIPON5 SMALL BE I1451*15= rM EVIDI OF OFF -5M 5MMfNT IRACKI NG ONTO FAVW 8URFIA . TRAM OWIMENr MOT 09 NNOM MM AL, QFMITr PAVW DAMAM DAM!WiMI N F4 MUM QF 0I800M. EROSION CONTROL 5ILT FACE RIZOMM ENDED CM 5TRFNGTH F1LTEIR STOF.#4r HT. FABRJC N=ED MKOUr WAKM15H 5UPPW PONDING FIT. STEEL OR WOOD P05T I N + f0 FT MAX SPACING MM GRAVEL W9IE SUFFOi�T PR�iCC G FT M" SPACING WITHOUT ALTERNATE DETAIL WIRE 5UPPM I=f?= TRENCH WTTH GRAVEL OVERLAP GEoTwnLE FABRIC 0 AND F=ASTEN AT Z'WTERVAI.5 zT7' L! DIRECTION OF iiUNOrr 1` IDW z_ ? EJtiEIV D WIPE b ME51"! INTO ai TRENCH SILT FENCE - HEAVY DUTY 5TP.EL. T 57VOM POST 5' MiN. LENGTii AT 13' MAX. SPACING _ WIRE 11 I=H RONFOri Mt:NT' -GMTFXTILE FABRIC PABRJC ANCHORAGE -TIUNCH BACKMtL %VM IN. Lt.RD91ON CONTROL NOTES: R= ColisndxIt" EMFAlI Z -PZKX C0N5TWJL1M Ati WN =i 5 L BE ItR3MUM PRIOR TO ANY &M MAOM 7Tit9t t't[LRAg= WALL BEMAN?'AINB} UM MAI GRADiNd 15 CCAMMZM 5mim 7U %IUFW ARDS SKAU BE BMW w" N"in HUMPM 5M f'�G hdl�i' 3A76 OR SppQSp _wc)qLU0N @CAJNNTFIX 5"L PC PLt+CW CH ALL SUITS a: f Ok CrMTW. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL IiAltD 5URFACE r PUBUC ROAD f� 5I1T FfXCE N(M: 1. SILT ft -N= SHALL Br INSTAL w Ilam ANY M&VATING. 2, IN5PI= AND REPAIR FENCE AFFER EACH. STORM dill AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN Nccc5.sw. 3. PJMOVED 5>DIMENT SHALL BE DPWC)E3= TO AN ARBA THAT YA LL NOT CORMBUTE SED1MEW Of -SITE AND CAN M pl:FiMADIUIil.Y 5TAI3NLIIED. #. SNIT r&CC SHALL BE PLACED 0" 5LOM CONTOUK5 TO MAX)MIZ PONDING EFFICIENCY. 2512' MOD K*T #' HILA. LENGTH AT #' MAX. SPACING GOOTD(TILE FAMC FAMC AtiCKCRAGA DItU:CT CN OF TMCH BACKFILL %" RUNO" TAMPW NA'Ti.JRAL "L �n MEN. i� SILT FENCE - PREA55EM15LF-0 /ROCA: CDN5i'R1iCT1ON .- �. I�1TiiANC�•� �. Th %<- A5 RMUIRED GFOTWILE 13AG INLET' PROTECTION INLET 5PEOAFIcAT10N5 A5 PER THE PLAN DIMENSION MGM AND WI MI5\ MATCH GEOTI5C 11! FADRIC, TYPE 1CVEN MONOFILAMENT CONFORMING TO 5PEC. SWG. TAE U W6 -I MACHINE 5LIC E -- MORr, SACK AND BOTTOM TO BE MADE FROM SINGLE P1ECE OF FAMC FOR INLETS V4n1 CAST CUR13 BOX LL91_ VMD ,2x4. DMO ICY DEYOND GRATE YAM ON 50TH SIDED. UNGTH VAR1F5. 5ECURE TO GRATE WITH 1MRE ORPLA9TIC TIES 4,xG' OVAL #TOLE SPALL BE MEAT CUT INTO ALL i'OUR SiDE PANE 15 MINIMUM DOU1Nf! 5TT(21ZD SLAMS ALL AROUND 51 DE F15CF9 AND ON fW POCKETS NOT125: INU!r PRD1ECT10N DDACE5 SHALL W MAINTAINED OR MACES A3 THE DEii=ON Or THE ENGINML MANUFACTURED ALTERNAT VE5 APPRpy® AND 1.15TED ON THE DEPAWME M ERMION CONTROL MODUGT ACCEPTA51LI Y L 15T MAY BE 5UB5Tm1W, WHEN REMOVING OK MMIITATNING INLET PROTECTiON, CARE SHAD. Be TAI4J;l,E SO THAT THE 5EpIMEM' TR71PJT) ON Ift GEOTTEGTILE FABRIC WES NOT FALL IN THE INLET. ANY MATERIAL PALLING INTO ThE INLET SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. FINISHED 517r, INCLUDING FOC9= MWZ REQUiRM. SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF` 10" "JIJND THE PERIMCTER TO FACILITATE MAINTi_i MCE OR RWQVCNL.. n Ar POCKM SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ALCM WOOD 294. IN5TAIJATION NOTE5: DO NOT IN5TAI1 PROTECTION IN INLETS 511ALLOWEKTI-IAN W. h+SMURED FROM THF_ NEON OJ* Tme INLET To THE TOP Or THE GRATE~ TRIM DZM517ABRID IN THF; FLAW UNE TO WITHIN 3'0F THE GRATE, THE IN3TAUM BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 51DE CLEAWCE, Wry&E 1 TtiE JNLEf AND -THE DAG MEASURLD AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW "OLE5. OF 3'. Y filf NECE55AKY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE: DAG, U51NG PL OTIC 71F TIES, TO ACHIEVET11E.S' C LEA ANCI'. THE TIES SHALL BE F A= AT A MAXIMUM Or 4' FROM THE BOTTOM OI' THE BAG_ K 1 I brei y► Mvy that ifas P6". mV frimpC e�derti�a die 5tita of M TbOM P. Date 5J1'1I07 Rng. No. G218 The dapynort a by Nn sw 1l,r" * PovckWma6. Icy. rHBdy and a XURS end WW a ffWtMU8T mfom.Aon Q,t+aded W Lem by Wo po wnv*_ Any do -b&" or ddbelbom of Uvs d*uwLMt Or MkrM&b n oo,ta..ed Werer, Noxxb Fnor % ntten coromtk of NOD. b 0 ALL RLGHM RESERVED - fT Lig 1. -� • � - ���"; aMumma �0'_ ' At /ROCA: CDN5i'R1iCT1ON .- �. I�1TiiANC�•� �. Th %<- A5 RMUIRED GFOTWILE 13AG INLET' PROTECTION INLET 5PEOAFIcAT10N5 A5 PER THE PLAN DIMENSION MGM AND WI MI5\ MATCH GEOTI5C 11! FADRIC, TYPE 1CVEN MONOFILAMENT CONFORMING TO 5PEC. SWG. TAE U W6 -I MACHINE 5LIC E -- MORr, SACK AND BOTTOM TO BE MADE FROM SINGLE P1ECE OF FAMC FOR INLETS V4n1 CAST CUR13 BOX LL91_ VMD ,2x4. DMO ICY DEYOND GRATE YAM ON 50TH SIDED. UNGTH VAR1F5. 5ECURE TO GRATE WITH 1MRE ORPLA9TIC TIES 4,xG' OVAL #TOLE SPALL BE MEAT CUT INTO ALL i'OUR SiDE PANE 15 MINIMUM DOU1Nf! 5TT(21ZD SLAMS ALL AROUND 51 DE F15CF9 AND ON fW POCKETS NOT125: INU!r PRD1ECT10N DDACE5 SHALL W MAINTAINED OR MACES A3 THE DEii=ON Or THE ENGINML MANUFACTURED ALTERNAT VE5 APPRpy® AND 1.15TED ON THE DEPAWME M ERMION CONTROL MODUGT ACCEPTA51LI Y L 15T MAY BE 5UB5Tm1W, WHEN REMOVING OK MMIITATNING INLET PROTECTiON, CARE SHAD. Be TAI4J;l,E SO THAT THE 5EpIMEM' TR71PJT) ON Ift GEOTTEGTILE FABRIC WES NOT FALL IN THE INLET. ANY MATERIAL PALLING INTO ThE INLET SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. FINISHED 517r, INCLUDING FOC9= MWZ REQUiRM. SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF` 10" "JIJND THE PERIMCTER TO FACILITATE MAINTi_i MCE OR RWQVCNL.. n Ar POCKM SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ALCM WOOD 294. IN5TAIJATION NOTE5: DO NOT IN5TAI1 PROTECTION IN INLETS 511ALLOWEKTI-IAN W. h+SMURED FROM THF_ NEON OJ* Tme INLET To THE TOP Or THE GRATE~ TRIM DZM517ABRID IN THF; FLAW UNE TO WITHIN 3'0F THE GRATE, THE IN3TAUM BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 51DE CLEAWCE, Wry&E 1 TtiE JNLEf AND -THE DAG MEASURLD AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW "OLE5. OF 3'. Y filf NECE55AKY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE: DAG, U51NG PL OTIC 71F TIES, TO ACHIEVET11E.S' C LEA ANCI'. THE TIES SHALL BE F A= AT A MAXIMUM Or 4' FROM THE BOTTOM OI' THE BAG_ K 1 I brei y► Mvy that ifas P6". mV frimpC e�derti�a die 5tita of M TbOM P. Date 5J1'1I07 Rng. No. G218 The dapynort a by Nn sw 1l,r" * PovckWma6. Icy. rHBdy and a XURS end WW a ffWtMU8T mfom.Aon Q,t+aded W Lem by Wo po wnv*_ Any do -b&" or ddbelbom of Uvs d*uwLMt Or MkrM&b n oo,ta..ed Werer, Noxxb Fnor % ntten coromtk of NOD. b 0 ALL RLGHM RESERVED Lig aMumma At a � Boo i M 04 U Nx C1*4 i LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Q,, Lmel GD' C wm H -b. Geegbu f.rip Fb L— I1F wNb ❑ AM I NAD40a W0 AREA LIGHT Wim HIGH PERFORMANCE WM ONE 408 WATT AFAR EI nMETAL HA euTebe 31ID00 O.n 486 GFFKA CLEAR RAT mAm HOR20NTALFO& M❑ T NAD4MOM ARFALIGW TiHHM PERFORMNiCESRS ONE4"ATTCLEAR EDMAMTALKALVE, N4/76J• S7V�00 On 486 ' OFTLCB. CLEAR RAT GIAm HCRMDNTALPOB CCG 2 AREA IIGHf WTmI" 141WATTCLE1R g KW4MMBW ORS ED -26 METAL FN -M WTI].. 12DW 0.72 030 CLEAR TUT 110RRONTA4mB, TW'R/e1TbNTe GENERAL PLOICISE DNE MWATT CLEAR FPF 6 BIMifGMO1WED m17V.ETAL HALIDE LR11�� two on MQ LLART wKu HDRZW)L P08. CInwF.176W Mm wt CLEAR LAMP. STATISTICS D"olp f eymbN Avp Np A41 M4nAw A19AW Cd.z—#1 + 1Bb N.Ob QDb NPA NIA NOTES 1. bnb iAeeodFbe, h¢doe.na..nsrtgwmbb+xer hfrPee4eTwea190e WglMry a cceeFbms blculer ebb 6pW8 mieeandadhreni 2 AamrdFpbefgAe6cne w elgem 6Vr1e. S 9SMp enmtrd ee4rhelvddm w rmeltl ®17e'. 4. PabmtuYd tde hMk2dWmwmon —3'0'cm01A Lw rtlA• 7QRple bt en nerM nlmmbp teipef N�0'AFF. 0.4idbp hOW yftn2b 7b2VPmughrsmgwbbm Nola. 6. N4n4YlctlnrhWdedhmb146ont6ufA. Q�pH Salrtltneat VFaw euerr Mom Mn NM LIME: 11MINAKY TTD BE USED FOR STRUCTION PURPOSES 0"-2007 ePeemmtt� a eq>oH ree vea- patl b7 mn a under m7 dYaN up Vftm and flat I rn o M7 r.od..d Ardttfwt undr Ne ."( tba etob of LOMYOIq mvmv{ie hle to ea by A® w—.d -4 M7 dbdmurs a 0e00uDm N Lhb downml a Mrmdbl cadditl tnlei'I HMut n1r Tdtt. r¢uml st mID, b uohiblled. 0 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED MIX 12 0 c`3 Z CL EP1 EXISTMG SUBWAY SIGN TO REMAIN I / / I / I I I I I / J EXISTING 30' JIFFY LUBE SIGN TO REMAIN EXISTING 30' DO SIGN TO REMAIN (MULTIPLE BUSINESSES) a ..'' a�~ �� Freeetendlg �.'. Mew Board— ' \_. PROPOSED BUILDING Well Mvd, Mau Board e � e VGNACxE PLAN AppROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED ST' PYLON HOLIDAY y WENDY$ 5KaN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED 51' TWIN POLE 61,0NFOR DO APPROVED WITH PREVIOUS PLAN Landmark -- O Center —r z�ra enan anent 1jJ ,,,,�.%' MOrYA'tENT MS NUt9ENT 8K3J (9X10) / DIRECTIONAL 51GN / I I M.by -11v tw W plan, •p.olK Uon. d'wp Wpr.• .a uem. dw.et •py<fsvi•lon Md W t I Iiye a duly •egl•us.Cl NdUI.cL vdm lM1. Iew. ar w •m. or rndwou. Slgneture. el.prl P. Gert Rwa. Nos 17881 D—.W p—.I—(NBpI w+..p �,w rmlb.am Wd»U.n Hades! fd ur by ps•dn.l only. My dl•ebw- d dt•tnbuUan of W tlOd.N'4 a adrn.Um day/4•d ISM, .Mout pld wrist.+ ran.�l of NBD, Y poFron.d. ®ALL RIGHTS RESERVED �4 z 0 r� O AZ a � O -•ns s F ti QI �A1.3 I o y_ v CL. ca CUl CL En 0 j V? T �c L �- I o v CL. col, 13c) L A Al 0 /41 Y+ P, C'r ,P YZ OA11 -J--/ FF Y 7 RECEIVED it MAY 15 2007 Q NW "Ol1aD!4LUOW \ �-1-7 '-WOu4dOlOAaQ 2>112.1W .JO- ut?ld o�!g jrnda--)uo� J?4-u?-2 )JDLUPUE)-7 a 3 At 20/1MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 20 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SECTION: 20-1:Purpose 20-2:General Requirements and Standards 20-3:Submission Requirements 20-4:Procedure for Processing a Planned Unit Development 20-1:PURPOSE: This chapter is established to provide comprehensive procedures and standards designed to allow the development of neighborhoods or portions thereof incorporating a variety of residential types and non-residential uses, recognizing that traditional density, bulk, setbacks, use, and subdivision regulations which may be useful in protecting the character of substantially developed areas may be inappropriate to control development in less developed areas. Specifically, it is intended to encourage: [A]Innovations in residential development to the end that the growing demands for housing at all economic levels may be met by greater variety in tenure, type, design, and siting of dwellings and by conservation and more efficient use of land in such development; [B]Higher standards of site and building design through the use of trained and experienced land planners, architects, and landscape architects; [C]More convenience in location of accessory commercial and service areas; [D]The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion; [E]A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of land from rural to urban uses; [F]An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering housing costs and public investments; [G]A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan; [H]A more desirable environment than would be possible through the strict app lic ati on o f zo nin g and sub div isi on r egul ati ons of t he C ity; [I]To give the landowner and developer reasonable assurance of ultimate approval before expending complete design monies while providing City officials with assurances that the project will retain the character envisioned at the time of concurrence; 20/2MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE [J]Flexibility for variation from the provisions of this ordinance including setbacks, height, lot area, width and depth, yards, etc. 20-2:GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS: [A]OWNERSHIP: Application for PUD approval must be filed by the landowner or jointly by all landowners of the property included in a project. The application and all submissions must be directed to the development of the property as a unified whole, i.e., a planned unit. In the case of multiple ownership, the approved final plan shall be binding on all owners. [B]COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY: The proposed PUD shall be consistent with the City comprehensive plan. [C]SANITARY SEWER PLAN CONSISTENCY: The proposed PUD shall be consistent with the City capital improvement program and comprehensive utility plan. [D]COMMON OPEN SPACE: Common open space at least sufficient to meet the minimum requirement established in this ordinance and such complementary structures and improvements as are necessary and appropriate for the benefit and enjoyment of the residents of the PUD shall be provided within the area of the PUD. [E]OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUD COMMON OPEN SPACE/FACILITIES: Whenever common open space or service facilities are provided within the PUD, the PUD plan shall contain provisions to assure the continued operation and maintenance of such open space and service facilities to a predetermined reasonable standard. Common open space and service facilities within a PUD may be placed under the ownership of one or more of the following as approved by the City Council: 1.Dedicated to public where a community-wide use is anticipated and the City Council agrees to accept the dedication. 2.Landlord control where only use by tenants is anticipated. 3.Property (homeowners) association, provided all of the following conditions are met: (a)Prior to the use or occupancy or sale or the execution of contracts for sale of an individual building unit, parcel, tract, townhouse, apartment, or common area, a declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions or an equivalent document or a document such as specified laws 1963, Chapter 457, Section 13, shall be filed with the City of Monticello, said filing with the City to be made prior to the filings of said declaration or document or floor plans with the recording officers of Wright County, Minnesota. 20/3MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE (b)The declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions or equivalent document shall specify that deeds, leases, or document or conveyance affecting buildings, units, parcels, tracts, townhouses, or apartments shall bind said properties to the terms of said declaration. (c)The declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall provide that an owners' association or corporation shall be formed and that all owners shall be members of said association or corporation which shall maintain all properties and common areas in good repair and which shall assess individual property owners proportionate shares of joint or common costs. This declaration shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. The intent of this requirement is to protect the property values of the individual owner through establishing effective private control. (d)The declaration shall additionally, amongst other things, provide that in the event the association or corporation fails to maintain properties in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the City of Monticello or fails to pay taxes or assessments on properties as they become due and in the event the said City of Monticello incurs any expenses in enforcing its rules and regulations, which said expenses are not immediately reimbursed by the association or corporation, then the City of Monticello shall have the right to assess each property its pro rata share of said expenses. Such assessments, together with interest thereon and costs of collection, shall be a lien on each property against which each such assessment is made. (e)Membership must be mandatory for each owner and any successive buyer. (f)The open space restrictions must be permanent and not for a given period or years. (g)The association must be responsible for liability insurance, local taxes, and the maintenance of the open space facilities to be deeded to it. (h)Property owners (homeowners) must pay their pro rata share of the cost of the association by means of an assessment to be levied by the association which meets the requirements for becoming a lien on the property in accordance with Minnesota Statutes. (i)The association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changed needs. 20/4MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE (j)The bylaws and rules of the association and all covenants and restrictions to be recorded must be approved by the City Council prior to the approval of the final PUD plan. [F]STAGING OF PUBLIC AND COMMON OPEN SPACE: When a PUD provides for common or public open space, the total area of common or public open space or land escrow security in any stage or development shall at a minimum bear the same relationship to the total open space to be provided in the entire PUD as the stages or units completed or under development bear to the entire PUD. [G]DENSITY: The maximum allowable density in a PUD shall be determined by reference to the comprehensive plan. Within that limit, the exact density allowable shall be determined by standards agreed upon between the applicant and the City. Whenever any PUD is to be developed in stages, no such stage shall, when averaged with all previously completed stages, have a residential density that exceeds twenty-five (25) percent of the proposed residential density of the entire PUD. [H]UTILITIES: In any PUD, all utilities, including telephone, electricity, gas, and telecable shall be installed underground. [I]UTILITIES CONNECTIONS: 1.WATER CONNECTIONS: Where more than one (1) property is served from the same service line, a shut-off valve must be located in such a way that each unit's service may be shut off by the City in addition to the normally supplied shut-off at the street. 2.SEWER CONNECTIONS: Where more than one (1) unit is served by a sanitary sewer lateral which exceeds three hundred (300) feet in length, provision must be made for a manhole to allow adequate cleaning and maintenance of the lateral. All maintenance and cleaning shall be the responsibility of the property owners' association or owner. [J]ROADWAYS: 1.Private roadways within the project shall have approved curb and gutter and an improved surface of twenty (20) feet or more in width and shall be so designed as to permit the City fire trucks to provide protectio n to each bui lding. 2.No portion of the required twenty (20) foot road system may be used in calculat ing required off-street parking spac e or be used fo r parking. [K]LANDSCAPING: In any PUD, landscaping shall be provided according to a plan approved by the City Council, which shall include a detailed planting list with sizes and species indicated as part of the final plan. In assessing the 20/5MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE landscapin g plan, the City Council shall consider the natural features of the particular site, the architectural characteristics of the proposed structures, the overall scheme of the PUD plan, and the general landscaping provisions of this ordinance. [L]URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICE: Residential development will be carefully phased so as to ensure that all developable land will be accorded a present vested right to develop at such time as services and facilities are available. Residential lands which have the necessary available municipal facilities and services will be granted approval in accordance with existing ordinance and development techniques. Residential lands which lack the available facilities and services will be granted approval for development at such times as the facilities and services have been made available by the continuing public improvement program or at such time when the residential developer agrees to furnish such facilities or imp rov eme nts put for th b y the Cit y or o the r pu bli c age ncy. If it can be demonstrated by the petitioner that divergence from the points above will not cause an unreasonable burden upon the City of Monticello in providing services and utilities or cause a deleterious impact upon the natural environment, then the City Council may consider granting a variance to this policy in reviewing a proposed development. No major PUD will be permitted in areas not having city water and sanitary sewer available within a reasonable length of time from the date of PUD approval. [M]TOWNHOUSE: 1.No single townhouse structure shall contain more than eight (8) dwelling units. 2.Minimum unit lot frontage for townhouses shall be not less than twenty (20) feet. 3.Townhouses, cooperatives, and condominiums will be subdivided on an individual unit bases according to the provisions of Section 20-2 [F] 3. [N]SETBACKS: 1.The front and side yard restrictions at the periphery of the Planned Unit Development site at a minimum shall be the same as imposed in the respective districts. 2.Front yard setbacks shall be established so as to meet the general design criteria within standard areas (zones) regulating the particular use or structure. 20/6MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 3.Building height(s) shall be established so as to meet the general design criteria within standard areas (zones) regulating the particular use or structure.(#237, 4/12/93) 20-3:SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Twenty (20) copies of the following exhibits, analyses, and plans shall be submitted to the Planning Commission and Council during the PUD process at the times specified in Section 20-4 of this chapter. [A]GENERAL CONCEPT STAGE: 1.General Information (a)The landowner's name and address and his interest in the sub jec t pr ope rty. (b)The applicant's name and address if different from the landowner. (c)The names and addresses of all professional consultants who have contributed to the development of the PUD plan being submitted, including attorney, land planner, engineer, and surveyor. (d)Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the subject pr operty to effect uate the pro posed PUD, including a statement of all legal, beneficial, tenancy, and contractual interests held in or affecting the subject property and including an up-to-date certified abstract of title or registered property report and such other evidence as the City Attorney may require to show the status of the title or control of the subject pro pert y. 2.Present Status: (a)The add res s an d le gal d escr ipt ion of t he s ubj ect pro pert y. (b)The existing zoning classification and present use of the subject property and all lands within one thousand (1,000) feet of t he s ubj ect pro pert y. (c)A map depicting the existing development of the subject property and all land within one thousand (1,000) feet thereof and showing the precise location of existing streets, property lines, easements, water mains, and storm and sanitary sewers, with invert elevations on and within one hundred (100) feet of the sub jec t pr ope rty. 3.A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD and the market which it is intended to serve, showing its relationship to the 20/7MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE City's comprehensive plan and how the proposed PUD is to be designed, arranged, and operated in order to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the Cit y. 4.Site Conditions: Graphic reproductions of the existing site conditions at a scale of one hundred (100) feet. All of the graphics would be the same scale as the final plan to allow easy cross reference. The use of overlays is recommended for clear reference. The following shall be included: (a)Contours - minimum two (2) foot intervals. (b)Location, type, and extent of tree cover. (c)Slope analysis. (d)Location and extent of water bodies, wetlands, and streams and flood plains within three hundred (300) feet of the subject pro pert y. (e)Significant rock outcroppings. (f)Existing drainage patterns. (g)Vistas and significant views. (h)Soil conditions as they affect development. 5.Schematic drawing of the proposed development concept, including but not limited to the general location of major circulation elements, public and common open space, residential, and other land uses. 6.A statement of the estimated total number of dwelling units proposed for the PUD and a tabulation of the proposed approximate allocations of land use expressed in acres and as a percent of the total project area, which s hall inclu de at least t he followi ng: (a)Area devoted to residential uses. (b)Area devoted to residential use by building type. (c)Area devoted to common open space. (d)Area devoted to public open space. (e)Approximate area devoted to streets. 20/8MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE (f)Approximate area devoted to and number of off-street parking and loading spaces and related access. (g)Approximate area and floor area devoted to commercial uses. (h)Approximate area and floor area devoted to industrial or office uses. 7.When the PUD is to be constructed in stages during a period of time extending beyond a single construction season, a schedule for the development of such stages or units shall be submitted stating the approximate beginning and completion date for each such stage or unit and the proportion of the total PUD public or common open space and dwelling units to be provided or constructed during each such stage and the overall chronology of development to be followed from stage to stage. 8.When the proposed PUD includes provisions for public or common open space or service facilities, a statement describing the provision that is to be made for the care and maintenance of such open space or service facilities. If it is proposed that such open space is owned and /or mai nta ine d by a ny en tit y oth er t han a gov ernm ent al a uth ori ty, copies of the proposed articles of incorporation and bylaws of such entity shall be submitted. 9.General intents of any restrictive covenants that are to be recorded with respect to property included in the proposed PUD. 10.Schematic utilities plans indicating placement of water, sanitary and storm sewers. [B]DEVELOPMENT STAGE: Development stage submissions should depict and outline the proposed implementation of the general concept stage for the PUD. Information from the general concept stage may be included for background and to provide a basis for the submitted plan. The development stage submissions shall include but not be limited to: 1.Zoning classification required for development stage submission and any other public decisions necessary for implementation of the proposed plan. 2.Twenty (20) sets of preliminary plans drawn to a scale of not less than one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) feet (or scale requested by the administrator) containing at least the following information: (a)Proposed name of the development (which shall not duplicate nor be similar in pronunciation to the name of any plat theretofore recorded in the county wherein the subject property is situated). 20/9MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE (b)Property boundary lines and dimensions of the property and any significant topographical or physical features of the pro pert y. (c)The location, size, use, and arrangement, including height in stories, a nd feet and t otal squar e feet of groun d area coverage and floor area, or proposed buildings, including mobile homes, and exi sti ng bu ild ings whi ch w ill rem ain , if any. (d)Location, dimensions, and number of all driveways, entrances, curb cuts, parking stalls, loading spaces, and access aisles, and all other circulation elements including bike and pedestrian, and the total site coverage of all circulation elements. (e)Location, designation, and total area of all common open space. (f)Location, designation, and total area proposed to be conveyed or dedicated for public open space, including parks, playgrounds, school sites, and recreational facilities. (g)Proposed lots and blocks, if any, and numbering system. (h)The location, use, and size of structures and other land uses on adjacent properties. (i)Prelimin ary sketches of p roposed lan dscaping. (j)General grading and drainage plans for the developed PUD. (k)Any other information that may have been required by the Planning Commission or Council in conjunction with the approval of the general concept plan. 3.An accurate legal description of the entire area within the PUD for which final development plan approval is sought. 4.A tabulation indicating the number of residential dwelling units by number of bedrooms and expected population/housing profile. 5.A tabulation indicating the gross square footage, if any, of commercial and industrial floor space by type of activity (e.g., drug store, dry cleaning, supermarket). 6.Preliminary architectural plans indicating use, floor plan, elevations, and exterior wall finishes of proposed buildings, including mobile homes. 7.A detailed site plan, suitable for recording, showing the physical 20/10MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE layout, design, and purpose of all streets, easements, right-of-ways, utility lines and facilities, lots, block, public and common open space, general landscaping plan, structures, including mobile homes, and uses. 8.Preliminary grading and site alteration plan illustration changes to existing topography and natural site vegetation. The plan should clearly reflect the site treatment and its conformance with the approved concept plan. 9.A final plat prepared by a land surveyor, duly registered in the state of Minnesota, in accordance with Chapter 505 of the Statutes of Minnesota which shall contain a notarized certification by such surveyor that the plat represents a survey made by him and that the monuments shown therein exist as located and that all dimensions are correct, as required by Section 505.03, Subdivision 1, M.S.A., and a notarized certificat ion by owner or o wners and by any mort gage holder of record of the adoption of the plat and the dedication of streets and other public areas as required by Section 505.03, Subdivision 1, M.S.A. 10.A soil erosion control plan acceptable to watershed districts, Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation Service, or any other agency with review authority clearly illustrating erosion control measures to be used during construction and as permanent measures. 11.A statement summarizing all changes which have been made in any document, plan data, or information previously submitted, together with revised copies of any such document, plan, or data. 12.Such other and further information as the Planning Commission, Administrator, or Council shall find necessary to give full consideration of the entire proposed PUD or any stage thereof. 13.The Planning Commission may, by a written order, excuse any applicant from submitting any specific item of information or document required by Section 20-3 [B] of this ordinance which it finds to be unnecessary to the consideration of the specific proposal for PUD approval. 14.The Planning Commission may, by written order, require the submission of any additional information or documentation which it may find necessary or appropriate to give full consideration of the proposed PUD or any aspect or stage thereof. [C]FINAL PLAN STAGE: After approval of a general concept plan for the PUD and approval of a development stage plan for a section of the proposed PUD, the applicant will submit the following material for review by the City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 20/11MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 1.A detailed landscaping plan. 2.Proof of recording any easements and restrictive covenants prior to the sale of any land or dwelling unit within the PUD and of the establishment and activation of any entity that it to be responsible for the management and maintenance of any public or common open spa ce or ser vic e fac ili ty. 3.All certificates, seals, and signatures required for the dedication of land and recording of documents. 4.Final architectural working drawings of all structures (floor plan, elevations, etc.; detailed plans and specs not required.) 5.Final engineering plans and specifications for streets, utilities, and other public improvements, together with a community/developer agreement for the installation of such improvements and financial guarantees for the completion of such improvements. 6.Any other plan, agreements, or specifications necessary for the City staff to review the proposed construction. All work must be in conformance with the Minnesota State Uniform Building Code. 20-4:PROCEDURE FOR PROCESSING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: [A]APPLICATION CONFERENCE: Upon filing of an application for PUD, the applicant of the proposed PUD shall arrange for and attend a conference with the City Planner and/or City staff. At such conference, the applicant shall be prepared to generally describe his proposal for a PUD. The primary purpose of the conference shall be to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance as to the general suitability of this proposal for the area for which it is proposed and its conformity to the provisions of City ordinances before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys, and other data. [B]GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN: 1.PURPOSE: The general concept plan provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan at the City showing his basic intent and the general nature of the entire development as the basis for the public hearing so that the proposal may be publicly considered at an early stage. The following elements of the proposed general concept plan represent the immediate significant elements which the City shall review and for which a decision shall be rendered: (a)Overall maximum PUD density range. (b)General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. 20/12MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE (c)General location and extent of public and common open space. (d)General location of residential and non-residential land uses with approximate type and intensities of development. (e)Staging and time schedule of development. (f)Other special criteria for development. 2.SCHEDULE: The length of time to accomplish the following sequence of events may vary due to publication deadlines, agenda limitations, and/or the pre-established meeting dates of the Planning Commission and/or City Council. (a)Developer files application for conditional use permit and rezoning (where applicable) concurrently with the submission of the general concept plan (at least fifteen (15) days prior to the Planning Commission meeting). (b)Developer meets with the City Planner and/or City staff to discuss the proposed development. (c)Planning Commission formally acknowledges filing of the application(s) for PUD, sets a public hearing, and refers the application(s) back to City staff and appropriate commissions for their official review. (d)Planning C ommissio n holds a pu blic hearin g. (e)Planning Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council on the general concept plan. (f)City Council reviews all recommendations and approves/denies application(s). 3.OPTIONAL SUBMISSION OF DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN: In cases of single stage PUDs or where the applicant wishes to begin the first stage of a multiple stage PUD immediately, he may at his option, submit development stage plans for the proposed PUD simu ltane ously w ith t he sub miss ion of the ge neral conce pt pl an. In such case, the applicant shall comply with all the provisions of the ordinance applicable to submission of the development stage plan. The Planning Commission and Council shall consider such plans simultaneously and shall grant or deny development stage plan approval in accordance with the provisions of Section 20-3 hereof. 4.EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL: Unless the applicant shall fail to meet time schedules for filing development stage and final 20/13MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE plans, or shall fail to proceed with development in accordance with the plans as approved, or shall in any other manner fail to comply with any condition of this ordinance or of any approval granted pursuant to it, a general concept plan which has been approved and a PUD agreement signed by the applicant shall not be modified, revoked, or otherwise impaired pending the application for approval of development stage and final plans by any action of the City of Monticello without the consent of the applicant. 5.LIMITATION ON GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL: Unless a development stage plan covering at least ten (10) dwelling units or the area designated in the general concept plan as the first stage of the PUD, whichever is greater, has been filed within nine (9) months from the date Council grants general concept plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file development stage and final plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance and of an approved general concept plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action. In such case, the Council shall forthwith adopt a resolution repealing the general concept plan approval for that portion of the PUD that has not received final approval would otherwise be applicable. Upon application by the applicant, the Council at its discretion may extend for additional periods, not in excess of nine (9) months each, the filing deadline for any development stage plan, when, for good cause sho wn, suc h ex ten sio n is nece ssa ry. [C]DEVELOPMENT STAGE: 1.PURPOSE: The purpose of the development stage plan is to provide a specific and particular plan upon which the Planning Commission will base its recommendation to the Council and with which substantial compliance is necessary for the preparation of the final plan. 2.SUBMISSION OF DEVELOPMENT STAGE: Upon approval of the general concept plan and within the time established by Section 20-4 [B] 3 of this chapter, the applicant shall file with the Administrator a development stage plan consisting of the information and submissions required by Section 20-3 of this chapter for the entire PUD or for one or more stages thereof in accordance with a staging plan approved as part of the general concept plan. The development stage plan shall refine, implement, and be in substantial conformance with the approved general concept plan. A detailed plan shall be deemed not to be in substantial conformance with an approved general concept plan if it: (a)Departs by more than five (5) percent from the maximum density approved for the PUD or exceeds the implied 20/14MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE maximum density established by the comprehensive plan for the area in which the PUD will be located. (b)Decreases by more than five (5) percent the area approved for public and common open space or changes the general location of such areas. (c)Relocates approved circulation elements to any extent that would decrease their function, adversely affect their relation to surrounding lands and circulation elements, or reduce their effectiveness as buffers or amenities. (d)Significantly alters the arrangement of land uses within the PUD. (e)Delays by more than one (1) year stage of an approved staging plan. (f)Departs from the general concept plan in any other manner which the Planning Commission shall, based on stated findings and conclusions, conclude materially alters the plan or concept for the proposed PUD. 3.REVIEW AND ACTION BY CITY STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION: Immediately upon receipt of a completed development stage plan, the Administrator shall refer such plan to the following City staff and/or official bodies for the indicated action: (a)The City Attorney for legal review of all documents. (b)The City Engineer for review of all engineering data for compliance with the requirements of City ordinances and review of the City/developer agreement. (c)The City Building Inspector for review of all building plans for compliance with the requirements of this chapter, the State of Minnesota Uniform Building Code, and any other applicable federal, state, or local codes. (d)The City Planner for review of all plans for compliance with the intent, purpose, and requirements of this chapter and conformity with the general concept plan and comprehensive plan. (e)The City Planning Commission for review and recommendation to the Council. (f)When appropriate, as determined by the Administrator, to the Park and Recreation Commission for review and 20/15MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE recommendations. (g)When appropriate, as determined by the Administrator, to other special review agencies such as the Watershed Districts, Soil Conservation Services, Highway Department, or other affected agencies. All staff designated in paragraphs (a) through (d) hereof shall submit their reports in writing to the Planning Commission and applicant. 4.SCHEDULE: The following sequence of events may vary due to publication deadlines, agenda limitations, and/or the pre-established meeting dates of the Planning Commission and/or City Council. (a)Developer makes application for subdivision (first phase of PUD) at least fifteen (15) days prior to Planning Commission meeting. (b)Developer meets with the City Planner and/or City staff to discuss specific development plans. (c)Planning Commission formally acknowledges filing and receipt of application, sets a public hearing, and refers application back to City staff and appropriate commissions for official review. (d)Planning C ommissio n holds a pu blic hearin g. (e)Within sixty (60) days of the public hearing, or such further time as may be agreed to by the applicant, the Planning Commission shall itself review said reports and plans and submit its written report and recommendations to the Council and applicant. Such report shall contain the findings of the Planning Commission with respect to the conformity of the development stage plan to the approved general concept plan, with respect to the merit or lack of merit of any departure of the development stage plan from substantial conformity with the concept plan, and with respect to the compliance of the development stage plan with the provisions of this chapter and all other applicable federal, state, and local codes and ordinances. If the Planning Commission shall find substantial conformity between such plans or that any lack of substantial conformity merits approval and shall further find the development stage plan to be in all other respects complete and in compliance with this chapter and other applicable federal, state, and local codes and ordinances, it shall recommend approval of the plan. Otherwise, it shall recommend denial. If the Planning Commission fails to act 20/16MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE within the time specified herein, it shall be deemed to have recommended the plan for approval. (f)Within thirty (30) days of receipt of the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Council shall grant approval, resubmit the plan to the Planning Commission for further consideration of specified items, or deny approval of the plan. (g)The Administrator shall instruct the City Attorney to draw up a PUD agreement which stipulates the specific terms and conditions approved by the City Council and accepted by the applicant. This agreement shall be signed by the Mayor of the City of Monticello, City Administrator, and the applicant within thirty (30) days of Council approval of the development stage plan. Where the development shall be by written report setting forth the reasons for its action. In all cases, a certified copy of the document evidencing Council action shall be promptly delivered to the applicant by the Administrator. 5.LIMITATION ON DETAILED PLAN APPROVAL: Unless a final plan covering the area designated in the development stage plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within six (6) months from the date Council grants development stage plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file final plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance and/or an approved development stage plan, the approval shall expire. Upon application by the applicant, the Council, at its discretion, may extend for not more than six (6) months the filing deadline for any final plan when, for good cause shown, such extension is necessary. In any case where development plan approval expires, the Council shall forthwith adopt a resolution repealing the general concept plan approval and the development stage plan approval for that portion of the PUD that has not received final plan approval and re-establishing the zoning and other ordinance provisions that would otherwise be applicable. 6.SITE IMPROVEMENTS: At any time following the approval of a development stage plan by the Council, the applicant may, pursuant to the applicable ordinances of the City, apply for and the Administrator may issue grading permits for the area within the PUD for which development stage plan approval has been given. If in approving the development stage plan the Council expressly authorizes it, the applicant may, pursuant to the applicable ordinances of the City, apply for and the Administrator may issue building permits for model homes to be constructed within the area of the PUD 20/17MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE provided, however, that no such permit shall be issued unless the Administrator shall first determine that the plans for any structure meet all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, State of Minnesota Uniform Building Code, and/or any other applicable federal, state, and local codes. [D]FINAL PLAN: 1.PURPOSE: The final plan is to serve as a complete, thorough, and permanent public record of the PUD and the manner in which it is to be developed. It shall incorporate all prior approved plans and all appro ved mo dific ation s ther eof re sult ing fr om th e PUD p roces s. It shall serve in conjunction with other City ordinances as the land use regulation applicable to the PUD. 2.SUBMISSION OF FINAL PLAN: Upon approval of the development stage plan and within the time established by Section 20- 4 [C] 5 of this chapter, the applicant shall file with the Administrator a final plan consisting of the information and submissions required by Section 20- 3 of this Chapter for the entire PUD or for one or more stages. The final plan is intended only to add detail to and to put in final form the information contained in the general concept plan and the developmen t stage plan and shall co nform to th e developme nt stage plan in all respects. 3.RECORDING OF FINAL PLAN: Within ten (10) days of its approval, the Administrator shall cause the final plan, or such portions thereof as are appropriate, to be recorded with the County Recorder, Register of Deeds, or Register of Titles. 4.BUILDING AND OTHER PERMITS: Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, upon receiving notice from the Administrator that the approved final plan has been recorded and upon application by the applicant pursuant to the applicable ordinances of the City, all appropriate officials of the City may issue building and other permits to the applicant for development, construction, and other work in the area encompassed by the approved final plan provided that no such permit shall be issued unless the appropriate official is first satisfied that the requirements of all codes and ordinances which are applicable to the permit sought have been satisfied. 5.LIMITATION ON FINAL PLAN APPROVAL: Within one (1) year after the approval of a final plan for PUD or such shorter time as may be established by the approved development schedule, construction shall commence in accordance with such approved plan. Failure to commence construction within such period shall, unless an extension shall have been granted as hereinafter provided, automatically render void the PUD permit and all approvals of the PUD plan, and the area 20/18MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE encompassed within the PUD shall thereafter be subject to those provisions of the zoning ordinances and other ordinances applicable in the district in which it is located. In such case, the Council shall forthwith adopt an ordinance amendment repealing the PUD permit and all PUD approvals and re-establishing the zoning and other ordinance provisions that would otherwise be applicable. The time limit established by this paragraph may, at the discretion of the Council, be extended for not more than one (1) year by ordinance or resolution duly adopted. 6.INSPECTIONS DURING DEVELOPMENT: (a)COMPLIANCE WITH OVERALL PLAN: Following final plan approval of a PUD or a stage thereof, the Building Inspector shall, at least annually until the completion of development, review all permits issued and construction undertaken and compare actual development with the approved plans for development and with the approved development schedule. If the Building Inspector finds that development is not proceeding in accordance with the approved schedule or that it fails in any other respect to comply with the PUD plans as finally approved, he shall immediately notify the Council. Within thirty (30) days of such notice, the Council shall either: i.revoke the PUD permit by ordinance amendment, and the land shall thereafter be governed by the regulations applicable in the district in which it is located; or ii.shall take such steps as it deems necessary to compel compliance with the final plans as approved; or iii.shall require the landowner or applicant to seek an amendment of the final plan. b.COMPLIANCE WITH CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND DRAWINGS: All improvements to be constructed or erected shall be subject to inspection by the City Building Inspector. The cost attributable to all inspections required by this subparagraph shall be charged to and paid by the owner or applicant. Before any required inspections take place, the owner or applicant may be required to post a deposit to cover the cost of such inspections. The owner or applicant shall give at least twenty-four (24) hours written notification to the City Building Inspector prior to the performance of any of the following work: 20/19MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE i.The surfacing of any roadway or street; ii.The installation of any curbing or gutters; iii.The grading or backfilling of any open trench or excavation in which any utility facilities, including but not limited to, water line, sewer lines, gas lines, and electrical cables, shall have been installed. If upon inspection, in the opinion of the City Building Inspector, any work does not comply with the approved construction plans and drawings of the approved final plan, the City Building Inspector shall have authority to order that all such work shall be terminated until such time as necessary steps are taken to correct any defects or deficiencies. The owner or applicant shall notify the City Building Inspector and request a reinspection. Upon completion of all required improvements within the area covered by the approved final plan, the owner or applicant shall notify the City Building Inspector who shall thereupon conduct a final inspection of all improvements as installed from the approved construction plan and drawings or approved final plan. If said final inspection reveals defects which will, in the opi nio n of the Cit y Building Inspector, adversely affect the performance, suitability, or desirability of said improvements, the Building Inspector shall notify the applicant in writing of such defects, deficiencies, or deviations, and the owner or applicant shall, at his sole cost and expense, correct such defects or deviations within six (6) months of the date of notifications. When such defects, deficiencies, or deviations have been corrected, the owner or applicant shall notify the City Building Inspector that the improvements are again ready for final inspection. If a final inspection indicates that all improvements as installed contain no defects, deficiencies, or deviations, then within ten (10) days from the completion of such inspection, the City Building Inspector shall certify to the Council that all improvements have been installed in conform ity with the co nstructio n plans and drawings and the final plan. The Council shall thereupon by resolution formally accept such improvements at which time they shall become the property of the City of Monticello. 20/20MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 1 10. Community Development Director’s Report. (AS) Bertram Chain of Lakes Over the next three months, the Acquisition Team for the Bertram Chain of Lakes will be meeting to discuss a 2011 acquisition at the park. To-date, the County and City have been successful in encumbering over $1.2 million in grant funding through various state programs, including Legacy grants. The City Council will be asked to fund its share of the acquisition match sometime this summer. The next purchase will more than likely encompass much of parcel 7, shown on the attached map. To complete the acquisition, a new Memorandum of Understanding between the YMCA, City and County will need to be developed, and a use agreement for park facilities (including the beach) will be developed. Please remember that the Bertram Chain of Lakes Family Fun Day is coming up – Saturday, June 11th from 11 AM – 4 PM. Information is attached. A concept plan for the park will be available for comment. Grass & Weeds Parks Department staff were out the last two weeks of May completing thistle spraying on all City properties that have been identified for thistle problems. In regard to stormwater areas, they spot-treated thistle problems where identified. The Parks Superintendent has indicated that the grasses established in these stormwater areas should not be harmed by the chemical being used. The Building Dept. will be completing private property inspections for thistle, beginning on May 27th. They will be inspecting all private properties that received prior notice to spray thistle. (The City had previously mapped these areas and sent notification letters to owners.) Formal citations will be issued to those private property owners who have not treated. As the Bldg. inspectors are out, they will also issue citations for long grass and weed problems of note, too. Citations for developing neighborhoods including Carlisle Village, Sunset Ponds and Hillside Farms have already been issued. After the citation, the property owned has 7 days to complete the spraying/cutting. Upon re-inspection, any unsprayed or uncut properties will be sprayed/cut and then assessed for the action. Hoop Buildings The Building Department will be canvassing the community for temporary “hoop” storage structures as they complete their grass and weed inspections this summer. More information on that inventory can be expected in July or August. Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 2 Census Data On May 12th, 2011, the US Census Bureau released the first detailed demographic information for the City of Monticello as part of the broader Minnesota data release. Attached is a summary file for basic General Population & Housing characteristics of the City. Highlights from the summary: Monticello’s 2010 population is 12,759. That is a marked difference over those estimates provided through the Census’ American Community Survey (2005-2009), which indicated an estimated population of 11,521, and the Minnesota State Demographer’s estimate, which showed an estimated 2009 population of 11,501. The Census tracks age in 5-year intervals. Monticello’s largest interval population for 2010 was in the 0-5 range, representing over 10% of the city’s total population. The next highest age ranges were in the 5-9 and 30-34 intervals. The median age for the city is now 31.4 years old. This data points to a youthful community and further supports the Comprehensive Plan’s vision for the community – which is provide housing, employment and recreational opportunities that encourage families to stay and grow in Monticello. It also speaks to the need to continue strengthen communication and collaboration with the Monticello School District. For historical reference, Monticello’s population at the time of the 2000 census was 8,034. In ten years, Monticello grew by over 4,700 persons, effectively increasing from its 2000 population by 50%. The largest age interval by population in 2000 was the 25-34 interval, representing 20% of the population at that time. There are now 4,693 households in Monticello. According to the Census, 67.4% of these households are “Family Households”. The average household size is 2.68, while the average family size is 3.23. The household makeup as a “Family” has shifted downward slightly, as in 2000 family households made up over 70% of the total households. Average household and family size has increased just slightly, as those numbers in 2000 were 2.64 and 3.13, respectively. Single-family household percentages have not shifted upward markedly. Between 2000 and 2010 the City increased the total number of housing units by 64% from 3,030 to 4,973 housing units. The City has also maintained a high housing occupancy rate, at over 94%, although this is a slight move downward from 97% in 2000. In terms of diversity, Monticello remains overwhelmingly homogenous, with Caucasians representing over 92% of the population. Hispanics represent the next largest demographic, with 5.4% of the population, up from 2% of the population in 2000. Staff will continue to analyze the data and provide the Commission l with other trends and comparisons over the coming year. Detailed economic, housing and social summary files will Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 3 also be released later this year and will be provided to the Commission as they become available. Silver Springs A large-scale residential development concept has been presented to city staff for the Silver Springs area. The concept is highly complex in nature and would require an intensive and expensive planning process. The entity proposing the concept has been provided with detailed information on that planning process by City staff. Before proceeding to the first step in the formal planning process, he has requested the opportunity to speak with the full City Council regarding his ideas, due to their scope and scale. Council will hold a short special workshop at the June 13th City Council meeting for the purpose of introducing the concept. Planning Commission is encouraged to attend. In addition to the concept presentation by the proposer, staff will provide with the same general planning process information that was provided to the proposer. Monticello Community Food Shelf Garden The garden at the Monticello Food Shelf was planted on Saturday, May 14th. With the help of a group of committed 4-H’ers and Girl Scouts, the sheet mulch garden was placed and planted within 2 hours. From this point, the Girl Scouts and 4-H volunteers will be maintaining the garden weekly, based on a schedule maintained by master gardener Andrea Holker. You can watch the progress of the garden on Facebook. The link to their page can be found on the City’s Facebook page. Variance Law HF 52 a bill related to variance statutes for Minnesota cities and counties, and as amended in the Minnesota Senate, passed both bodies unanimously and was signed into law by Governor Dayton on May 5th. A copy of the bill is attached to this report. The Session law text is expected to be posted during the summer. The new law amends the standards for granting a variance and applies to counties, cities, and towns with zoning controls. The change applies similar standards to the individual county and municipal planning and zoning statutes. This is a change from the previous statutes, which set different standards for cities and counties in the granting of variances. Additionally, the term "hardship" is now eliminated for cities and allows a zoning authority to issue a variance to a zoning control if there are "practical difficulties". "Practical difficulties" are described as follows: The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an official control; The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 4 Finally, a variance may be issued only if it is "in harmony with the general purposes and intent" of the ordinance and consistent with the comprehensive plan. In Monticello, the Planning Commission acts as the Board of Adjustment for the review of variances. This change in statute now gives the Board, and the City, more latitude in granting variances. The City will need to amend its current ordinances pertaining to variances as a result of the law. However, the amendments are minor in scope as the majority of the new code language is consistent with the law. These amendments will move forward to hearing at the July Planning Commission meeting. Commission will recall that the legislation was initiated by the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) in response to the June 2010, Minnesota Supreme Court decision Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka, 783 N.W.2d. In this case, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that the city did not have authority to grant the variance if the property owner could put the property to a reasonable use without a variance and noted that the legislature would be required to provide a more flexible variance standard than provided for in existing municipal law. TH 25 / CSAH 11 / CR 14 Intersection Improvements (Mn/DOT) Construction is anticipated to occur between June 6th and September 2nd. These improvements will increase the capacity of this intersection b y adding dual turn lanes between TH 25 and CSAH 11. This work will include the reconstruction of TH 25 from the Mississippi River bridge to north of CSAH 17, as well as the reconstruction of a portion of CSAH 11 (limits still undetermined). Mn/DOT’s plans show all NB TH 25 traffic shifting to one lane south of Broadway. This will result in a significant number of traffic control measures (barrels, signs, etc) being installed for several blocks south of CSAH 75, which tend to make it hard for drivers to locate local business accesses. City staff is working with Mn/DOT to try to minimize impacts to businesses. The lane shifts are expected to be in place for 4 to 6 weeks. It should be noted that the City is working with Mn/DOT to try to move the single lane shift onto the bridge to minimize traffic issues within the downtown area. CSAH 75 Realignment/Reconstruction (Wright County) Wright County will reconstruct CSAH 75 from West River Street to the westerly City limits. This will include the realignment of this section of CSAH 75 to allow Wright County to remove the existing bridge over the BNSF railroad tracks and to construct an at-grade railroad crossing instead. The realignment of CSAH 75 will re-route the highway through an existing low area west of West River Street where the elevation difference between the new road surface and the existing ground is over 10 feet. This may allow the City to install a box culvert under CSAH 75 at minimal cost for use as a pedestrian underpass. City staff is working with Wright County and Xcel Energy to develop plans for the purpose of bidding the underpass and one or more sections of connecting pathway with Wright County’s project this spring. The City is also considering the installation of a pedestrian underpass in conjunction with the County’s project, but this work has not yet been authorized by the City Council. However, Council did approve the preparation of plans and specifications for this work, which were completed and are out for bids at this time. Bids are due on June 7th, and the bid results will be presented to the City Council on June 13th for consideration of approving construction of Planning Commission Agenda: 06/07/11 5 the underpass. TH 25 / CSAH 75 NE Quadrant Improvements (Monticello) This project includes the construction of dual right turn lanes from WB Broadway to NB TH 25, as well as a right turn lane to East River Street from NB TH 25. Hardrives, the City’s contractor for this project, resumed construction in mid-April and plans to complete their work in early June. During construction Hardrives has coordinated their work with Walgreen’s and Mn/DOT’s contractors to ensure that all work is well-coordinated to minimize impacts to traffic and local businesses. Alignment Studies for Fallon Avenue Overpass / Second River Crossing (Monticello) The City Council recently authorized several studies to assist in determining the preferred alignments for both the proposed Fallon Avenue Overpass and a second Mississippi River Crossing. This is being accomplished by completing an origin and destination study which involves capturing vehicle counts and license plate numbers of vehicles entering the City on TH 25 and also on the other legs of the intersection to see where they are coming from and going to as they travel through the City. This data will also be augmented by 2010 census tract information. The resultant data will then be used, along with other information, to determine the preferred alignments for the proposed Fallon Avenue Overpass and second Mississippi River Crossing. 2011 Street Reconstruction (Monticello) If approved by Council, this next street reconstruction project will include the reconstruction of East River Street from Cedar Street to approximately 1,100 feet east of Washington Avenue, including the adjacent side streets to West Broadway, as well as the reconstruction of West River Street from CSAH 75 to the ball field’s entrance. Improvements to the intersection of Walnut Street & West 7th Street are also being proposed with this project, which will help to reduce congestion and increase safety for drivers and pedestrians navigating through this busy intersection. Improvements will include the addition of dedicated left turn lanes and additional pedestrian facilities, which will require widening 7th Street west of Walnut Street. Construction is proposed to occur from mid-June through October. 2011 Street Lighting Improvements (Monticello) If approved by Council, this proposed improvement project will include the installation of LED street and pathway lighting assemblies along East 7th Street between Cedar Street and Saint Henry’s Church. This work would occur between July and October. DP-1 Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics: 2010 2010 Demographic Profile Data NOTE: For more information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/profiletd.pdf. GEO: Monticello city, Minnesota Subject Number Percent SEX AND AGE Total population 12,759 100.0 Under 5 years 1,292 10.1 5 to 9 years 1,101 8.6 10 to 14 years 969 7.6 15 to 19 years 823 6.5 20 to 24 years 731 5.7 25 to 29 years 1,097 8.6 30 to 34 years 1,158 9.1 35 to 39 years 1,046 8.2 40 to 44 years 945 7.4 45 to 49 years 846 6.6 50 to 54 years 659 5.2 55 to 59 years 490 3.8 60 to 64 years 395 3.1 65 to 69 years 331 2.6 70 to 74 years 253 2.0 75 to 79 years 204 1.6 80 to 84 years 190 1.5 85 years and over 229 1.8 Median age (years)31.4 ( X ) 16 years and over 9,209 72.2 18 years and over 8,835 69.2 21 years and over 8,441 66.2 62 years and over 1,440 11.3 65 years and over 1,207 9.5 Male population 6,280 49.2 Under 5 years 689 5.4 5 to 9 years 596 4.7 10 to 14 years 471 3.7 15 to 19 years 402 3.2 20 to 24 years 354 2.8 25 to 29 years 550 4.3 30 to 34 years 568 4.5 35 to 39 years 543 4.3 40 to 44 years 491 3.8 45 to 49 years 438 3.4 50 to 54 years 326 2.6 55 to 59 years 217 1.7 60 to 64 years 193 1.5 65 to 69 years 129 1.0 70 to 74 years 121 0.9 75 to 79 years 81 0.6 80 to 84 years 59 0.5 85 years and over 52 0.4 1 of 4 05/18/2011 Subject Number Percent Median age (years)30.6 ( X ) 16 years and over 4,432 34.7 18 years and over 4,249 33.3 21 years and over 4,065 31.9 62 years and over 556 4.4 65 years and over 442 3.5 Female population 6,479 50.8 Under 5 years 603 4.7 5 to 9 years 505 4.0 10 to 14 years 498 3.9 15 to 19 years 421 3.3 20 to 24 years 377 3.0 25 to 29 years 547 4.3 30 to 34 years 590 4.6 35 to 39 years 503 3.9 40 to 44 years 454 3.6 45 to 49 years 408 3.2 50 to 54 years 333 2.6 55 to 59 years 273 2.1 60 to 64 years 202 1.6 65 to 69 years 202 1.6 70 to 74 years 132 1.0 75 to 79 years 123 1.0 80 to 84 years 131 1.0 85 years and over 177 1.4 Median age (years)32.4 ( X ) 16 years and over 4,777 37.4 18 years and over 4,586 35.9 21 years and over 4,376 34.3 62 years and over 884 6.9 65 years and over 765 6.0 RACE Total population 12,759 100.0 One Race 12,496 97.9 White 11,812 92.6 Black or African American 195 1.5 American Indian and Alaska Native 64 0.5 Asian 130 1.0 Asian Indian 32 0.3 Chinese 16 0.1 Filipino 12 0.1 Japanese 2 0.0 Korean 31 0.2 Vietnamese 7 0.1 Other Asian [1]30 0.2 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 4 0.0 Native Hawaiian 0 0.0 Guamanian or Chamorro 3 0.0 Samoan 0 0.0 Other Pacific Islander [2]1 0.0 Some Other Race 291 2.3 Two or More Races 263 2.1 White; American Indian and Alaska Native [3]49 0.4 White; Asian [3]57 0.4 White; Black or African American [3]100 0.8 White; Some Other Race [3]31 0.2 Race alone or in combination with one or more other races: [4] White 12,065 94.6 Black or African American 309 2.4 American Indian and Alaska Native 124 1.0 2 of 4 05/18/2011 Subject Number Percent Asian 197 1.5 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 14 0.1 Some Other Race 327 2.6 HISPANIC OR LATINO Total population 12,759 100.0 Hispanic or Latino (of any race)686 5.4 Mexican 420 3.3 Puerto Rican 29 0.2 Cuban 23 0.2 Other Hispanic or Latino [5]214 1.7 Not Hispanic or Latino 12,073 94.6 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 12,759 100.0 Hispanic or Latino 686 5.4 White alone 360 2.8 Black or African American alone 3 0.0 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 3 0.0 Asian alone 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 0 0.0 Some Other Race alone 281 2.2 Two or More Races 39 0.3 Not Hispanic or Latino 12,073 94.6 White alone 11,452 89.8 Black or African American alone 192 1.5 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 61 0.5 Asian alone 130 1.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 4 0.0 Some Other Race alone 10 0.1 Two or More Races 224 1.8 RELATIONSHIP Total population 12,759 100.0 In households 12,580 98.6 Householder 4,693 36.8 Spouse [6]2,311 18.1 Child 4,344 34.0 Own child under 18 years 3,650 28.6 Other relatives 409 3.2 Under 18 years 166 1.3 65 years and over 37 0.3 Nonrelatives 823 6.5 Under 18 years 91 0.7 65 years and over 20 0.2 Unmarried partner 447 3.5 In group quarters 179 1.4 Institutionalized population 131 1.0 Male 31 0.2 Female 100 0.8 Noninstitutionalized population 48 0.4 Male 22 0.2 Female 26 0.2 HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE Total households 4,693 100.0 Family households (families) [7]3,164 67.4 With own children under 18 years 1,898 40.4 Husband-wife family 2,311 49.2 With own children under 18 years 1,318 28.1 Male householder, no wife present 282 6.0 With own children under 18 years 180 3.8 Female householder, no husband present 571 12.2 With own children under 18 years 400 8.5 3 of 4 05/18/2011 Subject Number Percent Nonfamily households [7]1,529 32.6 Householder living alone 1,197 25.5 Male 505 10.8 65 years and over 89 1.9 Female 692 14.7 65 years and over 356 7.6 Households with individuals under 18 years 2,024 43.1 Households with individuals 65 years and over 852 18.2 Average household size 2.68 ( X ) Average family size [7]3.23 ( X ) HOUSING OCCUPANCY Total housing units 4,973 100.0 Occupied housing units 4,693 94.4 Vacant housing units 280 5.6 For rent 87 1.7 Rented, not occupied 1 0.0 For sale only 117 2.4 Sold, not occupied 15 0.3 For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 26 0.5 All other vacants 34 0.7 Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) [8]3.3 ( X ) Rental vacancy rate (percent) [9]6.3 ( X ) HOUSING TENURE Occupied housing units 4,693 100.0 Owner-occupied housing units 3,391 72.3 Population in owner-occupied housing units 9,657 ( X ) Average household size of owner-occupied units 2.85 ( X ) Renter-occupied housing units 1,302 27.7 Population in renter-occupied housing units 2,923 ( X ) Average household size of renter-occupied units 2.25 ( X ) X Not applicable. [1] Other Asian alone, or two or more Asian categories. [2] Other Pacific Islander alone, or two or more Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander categories. [3] One of the four most commonly reported multiple-race combinations nationwide in Census 2000. [4] In combination with one or more of the other races listed. The six numbers may add to more than the total population, and the six percentages may add to more than 100 percent because individuals may report more than one race. [5] This category is composed of people whose origins are from the Dominican Republic, Spain, and Spanish-speaking Central or South American countries. It also includes general origin responses such as "Latino" or "Hispanic." [6] "Spouse" represents spouse of the householder. It does not reflect all spouses in a household. Responses of "same-sex spouse" were edited during processing to "unmarried partner." [7] "Family households" consist of a householder and one or more other people related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. They do not include same-sex married couples even if the marriage was performed in a state issuing marriage certificates for same-sex couples. Same-sex couple households are included in the family households category if there is at least one additional person related to the householder by birth or adoption. Same-sex couple households with no relatives of the householder present are tabulated in nonfamily households. "Nonfamily households" consist of people living alone and households which do not have any members related to the householder. [8] The homeowner vacancy rate is the proportion of the homeowner inventory that is vacant "for sale." It is computed by dividing the total number of vacant units "for sale only" by the sum of owner-occupied units, vacant units that are "for sale only," and vacant units that have been sold but not yet occupied; and then multiplying by 100. [9] The rental vacancy rate is the proportion of the rental inventory that is vacant "for rent." It is computed by dividing the total number of vacant units "for rent" by the sum of the renter-occupied units, vacant units that are "for rent," and vacant units that have been rented but not yet occupied; and then multiplying by 100. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census. 4 of 4 05/18/2011 A. CE'RTCAN! Faeffinder DP -1 I Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1) 100 -Percent Data NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, definitions, and count corrections see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expsfl u.htm. Subject Monticello city, Minnesota Number Percent ,Total population 7,8681. 100.0; SEX AND AGE Male 3,7931 48.2 Female 4,075 51.8 Under 5 years 799; 10.2; 5 to 9 years 725 9.21 10 to 14 years 610; 7.8 15 to 19 years 511 6.5 20 to 24 years 5471 7.0, 25 to 34 years 1,571 20.01 35 to 44 years 1,215; 15.4 45 to 54 years 719 91 55 to 59 years 271' 3.4 60 to 64 years 202 2.6 to 74 years 316' 4.0 to 84 years 260 3.3 85 years and over 122 1.6 Median age (years) 29.8 (X) 18 years and over 5,394, 68.6; Male 2,556 32.5 Female 2,838; 36.1 21 years and over 5,117 65.0 62 years and over 812' 10.3 65 years and over 698 &9: Male 260;3.3 Female 438 5.6; RACE One race 7,765 98.7 White 7,629E 97.0 Black or African American 26 0.31 American Indian and Alaska Native 16 0.2 Asian 43 0.5 Asian Indian 5' 0.1 Chinese 1 0.01 Filipino 6 0.11 Japanese 1 0.0 Korean 18, 0.2' Vietnamese 5 0.1 Other Asian [1] T 0.1 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1 0.0 Native Hawaiian 0 0.0` 3uamanian or Chamorro 0 0.0' Samoan 0, 0.0' Other Pacific Islander [2] 1 0.01 1 of 3 05/18/2011 Subject Monticello city, Minnesota Number Percent Some other race ! 50 0.6 Two or more races 103 1.31 ' Race alone or in combination with one or more other races[31 White 7,728 98.2' Black or African American 57 0.71 American Indian and Alaska Native 50 0.6, Asian 69 0.9' Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 4 0.1 i Some other race 66; 0.8 'HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE I Total population 7,8681 100.0 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 160 2.01 Mexican 121 j 1.5 Puerto Rican 4 0.1 Cuban 0 0.0 Other Hispanic or Latino 35 0.4 Not Hispanic or Latino 7,708] 98.0 White alone 7,535 95.8 1RELATIONSHIP Total population 7,8681 100.0 In households 7,7751 98.8 Householder 2,944 37.4 Spouse { 1,550; 19.7 Child 2,6831 34.1 Own child under 18 years I 2,3931 30.4 Other relatives 166 2.1 Under 18 years 42 0.5 Nonrelatives 433 5.5 j Unmarried partner 2003 2.5 In group quarters 93� 1.2 1 Institutionalized population 1 92 1.2 Noninstitutionalized population 11 0.0 HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE Total households 2,9441 100.0 Family households (families) E 2,066; 70.2 With own children under 18 years 1,285 43.6 Married -couple family 1,5501 52.6 With own children under 18 years 876 29.8 Female householder, no husband present 3801 12.9 With own children under 18 years 3071 10.4 s Nonfamily households 8781 29.8 Householder living alone 698 23.7 Householder 65 years and over , 2341 7.9 Households with individuals under 18 years 1,316 44.7 Households with individuals 65 years and over 4621 15.7 Average household size 2.64 (X) Average family size 3.13 (X) :HOUSING OCCUPANCY Total housing units 3,030 100.0 Occupied housing units 2,944 97.2 Vacant housing units ; 861 2.8 For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 101 0.3, Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) 1.41 (X)! Rental vacancy rate (percent) 2.8 Ni I TENURE l Occupied housing units 2,944 100.01 Owner -occupied housing units 2,1221 72.1 Renter -occupied housing units 822 27.91, Average household size of owner -occupied unit 2.90; (X) 2 of 3 05/18/2011 Subject Monticello city, Minnesota Number Percent Average household size of renter -occupied unit 1.97 (X) (X) Not applicable. [1] Other Asian alone, or two or more Asian categories. [2] Other Pacific Islander alone, or two or more Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander categories. [3] In combination with one or more other races listed. The six numbers may add to more than the total population and the six percentages may add to more than 100 percent because individuals may report more than one race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 1, Matrices P1, P3, P4, P8, P9, P12, P13, P,17, P18, P19, P20, P23, P27, P28, P33, PCT5, PCT8, PCT11, PCT15, H1, H3, H4, H5, H11, and H12. 3 of 3 05/18/2011 Ail BETRAM C H A I N 0 F LAKES REGIONAL PARK FREE ACTIVITIES & EVENTS kGuided Wagon Rides *Hiking Face Painting *Canoeing 'Kayaking *Amphitheater Events *Child Fishing *Open Swimming with Life Guards on Duty *Bring a picnic lunch or purchase concessions. EVENT SPONSORS lam fhevVet cel En era .7 Monticello Cargill Kitchen Solutions 7/ CLEAR ' Ciirfill Y 'CLEAR it Clearwater, NM Wrigh iver Viv 320-469-1590 • MEDICAL CEN TER VEOLIA clearwatersoutfittingco.com ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES WAGON RIDES 11am-3:30pm Guided horse-drawn wagon rides will be running past Bertram and Long Lakes throughout the day! Don't miss your chance to hitch a ride so you can sit back and enjoy the beautiful scenery! 1 I AMPHITHEATER EVENTS I The Wildlife Science Center will be presenting: 11:30 am - Animals Nobody Loves, with a live skunk, - y iR orcu me and snakes! 1:00p Pm - Raptors of Minnesota, with 3 Birds of Prey! CANOEING SWIMMING FISHING 11 am - 3:30 � f � � �, � *`�`�' ; 11 am - 3:30 m p 11 am 3:30 p , Enjoy an afternoon of / J y �°��� � �, Open swimming at Child fishing canoeing or ; `' beautiful Bertram Lake near the beach. kayaking on Long beach. Lifeguards will Poles and bait �� `R., '� be on duty. �, , �s will be Lake. Canoes and a f provided. - C kayaks provided t, Children are courtesy of Clear r j not required to Waters Outfitters. Life have licenses. - 4 h. jackets also provided. l; 1 rdf , l i i ? f r ✓.' t r � FAGEPAINTING HIDING FREE TREES I. I 11 am-4pm 11 am -3:30 pm 11 am-4pm Monticello Royalty r.r Y Y .There will be two TREE SEEDLING, and the candidates It different routes of DISTRIBUTION ;^ . will be showing off g g varying lengths Bring some green m Y their artistic talentsTree seedlings d o n' X_ = and difficulty for r} a with nature- by Wright H e n n e pi ' a �you to enjoy. All Electric will be ..` themed face r routes marked. , distributed through painting! > , the day I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — PICNIC AT THE BEACH Amphibians & Reptiles Bringour own picnic or the Lion's Club will have some s —,�_ Meet and pet amphibians & Y � � concession items for purchase. All profits from the sale will go ,.�� reptiles sponsored by the, to the Friends of Bertram for their activities and events. Herpetological Society 11am to 4 pm