Planning Commission Minutes 09-06-2016MINUTES
RF -GULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, September 6th, 2016
Mississippi Room, Monticeilo Community Center
Commissioners: Brad Fyle, Linda Buchmann, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson
Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler
Staff: Angela Schumann, Jacob Thunander, Chuck Rickart (WSB)
1. GeneraG Business
A. Call to Order
Chairman Fyle called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m.
B. Consideration of approving minutes
a. Regular Meeting Minutes — August 2nd, 2016
MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR
MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 2ND, 2016. MOTION
SECONDED BY LINDA BUCHMANN. MOTION CARRIED, 4 -0.
b. Recessed Regular Meeting Minutes — August 2" d, 2016
BRAD FYLE MOVED TO APPROVE THE RECESSED REGULAR
MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 2ND, 2016. MOTION
SECONDED BY SAM MURDOFF. MOTION CARRIED, 4 -0.
C. Citizen Comments
NONE.
D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
Council Member Gabler requested adding two items, including: Broadway
Market by Kwik Trip and a Potential Multi -Unit Housing Project on the East
Side of Monticello.
2. Public Hearings
A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a request for amendment to the
Monticello Zoning Ordinance for the Monticello High School Addition
Planned Unit Development, a request for Development and Final Stage
Planned Unit Development for the Monticello High School campus area.
Applicant: Wold Architects & Engineers
Angela Schumann introduced Wold Architects & Engineers as the applicant
on behalf of the Monticello School District. The proposal is for development
and final stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) for expansions to the
Monticello High School campus area. Schumann stated the existing and
proposed site is consistent with the language set forth in the Comprehensive
Plan under Places for Community.
Schumann reminded the Planning Commission that the series of parcels were
rezoned to PUD zoning district to maximize the public values and achieve
more creative development outcomes that could not be achieved under
standard zoning standards.
Schumann briefly discussed the history of improvements at the Monticello
High School campus. The school district previously received approval for
preliminary and final plat with the recording of the plat in progress. The
development and final stage PUD for Phase I was approved to construct a
gymnastics facility at the High School and is currently under construction.
The applicant noted in the PUD that subsequent phases of development would
occur, requiring no amendment to the PUD.
The Planning Commission and City Council held a joint meeting in June,
2016 to review Phases II -IV. Schumann also stated the applicant attended a
concept review meeting with City Staff. The applicant has designed the site to
be consistent with the City's feedback.
Schumann then explained the proposed improvements for Phase II -IV. Phase
II consists of an addition to Eastview School, which includes the addition of
13 classrooms and an alteration to the access point from School Boulevard to
a right out turning movement. Phase III consists of the addition of athletic
facilities, which will lie between Little Mountain and the High School. The
addition includes a football /soccer /lacrosse stadium, a track, a
ticket/restroom /concessions building, team room /storage building, three sets
of permanent bleachers. Phase IV includes a new canopy and sidewalk
entrance and enhanced security improvements to Little Mountain.
Schumann requested the applicant provide further details about the existing
uses at each school to better understand the site.
Schumann also mentioned that City Staff recommended providing EFIS or a
material consistent with institutional building materials requirements from the
City's zone ordinance in place of vinyl and steel on stadium buildings and
press boxes.
Schumann then covered site parking and pedestrian and vehicle circulation.
The site is bordered by collector routes including: School Boulevard, Chelsea
Road, Fallon Avenue, and Fenning Avenue. She noted "no parking"
conditions exist along School Boulevard, Chelsea Road, and Fenning Avenue.
Schumann stated the stadium seating capacity is 2,990 seats. According to
NAC, parking is calculated at a four people per one car ratio and should
provide adequate parking spaces during events. In addition, City Staff
recommended clarifying the bus parking locations for overflow; identifying
internal pedestrian routing (and improvements) to accommodate cross - parking
for peak periods of use, including a connection between the pathway and
ticketing area; submitting additional information on site circulation overall
and turning movement for Eastview; and providing parking access for the
baseball field in narrative or site plan detail.
Schumann also discussed site landscaping and noted it seemed consistent with
the overall campus. City Staff recommended providing evergreen tree
plantings along west and south side of the team room building and to provide
2
shrub line along School Boulevard to protect pedestrian routes from wind and
snowdrifts.
Schumann then spoke about signage and lighting. She noted that signage is
minimal on the site and the proposal is within the requirements. The applicant
is proposing four poles, two on each side of the football stadium, seventy feet
in height, and ten fixtures per pole. A photometric was submitted and
indicated that no light spread will illuminate surrounding property.
City Staff recommends compliance with the terms of the City Engineer's
letter which include stormwater management and circulation and construction
level design on utility and stormwater and access design.
Chairman Fyle asked for details about the elevated plaza. Eric Linner, Wold
Architects & Engineers, explained the area is a green space and could be used
for vendors or for children as a play area.
Council Member Charlotte questioned the right turning movement from
Eastview Elementary and asked if there would be traffic concerns along
School Boulevard. Chuck Rickart stated that it shouldn't be a cause of
concern. She also asked about parking at the existing ballfield along Chelsea
Road. Linner stated that hasn't been looked into, but would work with the
City in addressing this concern.
Chairman Fyle opened the public hearing.
Commissioner Murdoff asked for the amount of people that typically attend
an event. Bruce Hanson, Monticello Public Schools, stated the amount
fluctuates, but would estimate the maximum to be around 2,000 people.
Commissioner Murdoff disagreed with the four people per vehicle standard
and expressed concerns with inadequate parking spaces. Hanson stated the
parking lot to the east of the High School and additional school parking lots
would be available, if necessary.
Council Member Gabler asked if tailgating would occur on the site. Hanson
stated most of the tailgating would likely occur on the plaza.
Chairman Fyle asked the applicant if they were able to review Exhibit Z and
had any concerns. Linner stated they would consider using alternate materials
for the buildings, but had not seen many examples of having a press box
constructed without steel siding.
Linner also stated bus parking would be also available at Little Mountain to
allow for more vehicle parking. The school district has also considered having
a shuttle program to and from Eastview and Little Mountain during large
events.
Linner verified the trees along the west and south side of team room building
have been added to the bid package and was willing to work with the City on
a possible shrub line. Wold Architects & Engineers are also working on
addressing the City Engineer's report.
Council Member Gabler asked if the structures were graffiti proof. Hanson
stated that vandalism has not been a concern in the past and have been able to
3
take care of any damage at low costs. Schumann added the zoning ordinance
does not include graffiti proof building materials.
Kyle Walter, ICS Consulting, noted security concerns with planting a shrub
line along School Boulevard. Schumann would like to work with the school
district on what that could look like. She also noted the athletic improvements
should also help with a wind and snow block along the pathway.
Commissioner Simpson asked for the reason for constructing additional
classrooms at Eastview Elementary. Linner stated the purpose of the project is
to bring all kindergarteners in the district to one site, which will help to free
up space at Pinewood and Little Mountain.
Chairman Fyle asked City Staff if comments have been received from Mills
Fleet Farm as their property will be adjacent to the athletic field. Schumann
stated she has not received any comments. It was noted a large buffer would
be between the two proposed sites.
Hearing no additional comments, the public hearing was closed.
Decision 1. Resolution No. PC- 2016 -033,
LINDA BUCHMANN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2016-
033 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE MONTICELLO HIGH
SCHOOL ADDITION, INCLUDING AN ADDITION TO EASTVIEW
ELEMENTARY, ATHLETIC STADIUM COMPLEX ADJACENT TO THE
HIGH SCHOOL, AND ENTRY AND SECURITY CHANGES TO LITTLE
MOUNTAIN ELEMENTARY, BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID
RESOLUTION, AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF EXHIBIT Z.
MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION.
Discussion pursued by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Murdoff
questioned whether EFIS was necessary for the press boxes and asked if there
would be weight concerns for other buildings to apply EFIS. Jay Pomeroy,
Anderson - Johnson Associates Inc., noted they have installed several press
boxes, which have used metal seam roof product. It is typically made of steel,
comes in a variety of colors, and is low maintenance. There would be
additional costs to include EFIS.
Commissioner Buchmann amended her motion to remove including EFIS on
"press boxes" from Exhibit Z, 2.
Decision 1. Resolution No. PC- 2016 -033,
LINDA BUCHMANN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2016-
033 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE MONTICELLO HIGH
SCHOOL ADDITION, INCLUDING AN ADDITION TO EASTVIEW
ELEMENTARY, ATHLETIC STADIUM COMPLEX ADJACENT TO THE
4
HIGH SCHOOL, AND ENTRY AND SECURITY CHANGES TO LITTLE
MOUNTAIN ELEMENTARY, BASED ON FINDINGS IN SAID
RESOLUTION, AND SUBJECT TO THE REVISED CONDITIONS OF
EXHIBIT Z. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED, 4 -0.
EXHIBIT Z
Development Stage Planned Unit Development,
Monticello High School Addition
5225 School Boulevard
1. Provide additional information in their narrative regarding such uses in order to
document the uses occurring within the PUD as part of the approval.
2. Provide EFIS or a material consistent with institutional building materials
requirements in place of vinyl and steel on stadium buildings.
3. Clarify bus parking locations for the stadium.
4. Identify internal pedestrian routing (and improvements) to accommodate cross -
parking for peak periods of use, including a connection between the pathway and
ticketing area
5. Provide evergreen tree plantings along west and south side of team room building.
6. Provide shrub line along School Boulevard to protect pedestrian routes from wind.
7. Verify signage on the ticketing building.
8. Compliance with the terms of the City Engineer's letter dated August 25t', 2016.
9. Conditions recommended by other City staff.
Schumann stated this item will be brought to the City Council on the Consent Agenda on
Monday, September 121h
B. Public Hearing — Consideration to approve an Amendment to the
Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4, Section 1 - Landscaping &
Screening for adoption of regulations pertaining to native landscaping
requirements.
Applicant: City of Monticello
Angela Schumann explained this item was brought to the Planning
Commission primarily for discussion and information on next steps. The
Planning Commission previously reviewed proposed amendments to the
Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4, as it relates to Native Landscapes.
The zoning ordinance outlines landscaping requirements and includes a
section that allows for alternative landscaping, specifically native landscaping.
5
The current ordinance is very specific and applies only to properties with
unique conditions.
The Planning Commission reviewed this possible amendment in December
2012, January 2013, and December 2013. The Planning Commission decided
to table action to gather a better understanding of the demand for native
landscapes in the community and to solicit community feedback.
Schumann then discussed the language included in a typical native landscapes
ordinance. An ordinance would include a description of the types of native
plant landscapes, standards, and enforcement. An application process would
also be required for those interested in planting native landscapes on their
properties.
Schumann asked the Planning Commission if they were interested in pursuing
a discussion about native landscaping ordinance. She stated staff would be
willing to work with their Communications Manager to reach out to the public
to gauge their interest. This feedback would in -turn be provided to the
Planning Commission.
Chairman Fyle noted concern with the types of native plants that would be
allowed. Schumann stated there would be a section of the ordinance that
identified the allowable native plants.
Council Member Gabler asked if the City has received any feedback from
residents. Schumann stated she has received more requests in 2012, but
occasionally receives inquiries. Council Member Gabler also asked how
Minneapolis handles their native landscapes in their greenway and asked the
City to investigate further into this.
Chairman Fyle and Commissioner Bachmann mentioned their concerns for
allowing this on residential properties.
Chairman Fyle opened the public hearing.
Schumann stated if the proposed amendment would not move forward, she
would occasionally provide resources and information in the director's reports
regarding native landscapes.
Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed.
Chairman Fyle stated the Planning Commission would table any action.
3. Regular Agenda
A. Consideration of Recommendation for Appointment of Planning
Commissioner
Chairman Fyle noted that a special meeting was held prior to the regular
Planning Commission meeting to interview applicants for the vacant Planning
Commissioner position. Two individuals were interviewed.
MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPOINTMENT OF
LUCAS WYNNE TO COMPLETE THE REMAINDER OF A THREE
Co
YEAR TERM ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION. LINDA BUCHMANN
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4 -0.
This item will be brought to the City Council during their regular meeting on
Monday, September 12tH
B. Consideration of the Community Development Directors Report
Angela Schumann discussed the Community Development Department's
letter that was sent out on September 1St, 2016 to all property owners with
floodplain on their parcel. The City of Monticello received notice from the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) stating that preliminary
floodplain boundary maps have been prepared. FEMA posted notice of a 90-
day period to review the data and appeal those boundaries. The map indicates
240 parcels that have floodplain on their property, with very few parcels that
have structures located in this area. The City of Monticello will collect,
review, and consolidate all appeals and send to FEMA.
Schumann reiterated that floodplain maps are the responsibility of FEMA and
not the City of Monticello. A final letter of determination will be sent by
FEMA that states their intent on adopting floodplain boundaries. There are
another series of steps residents and the City of Monticello may take during
that time.
4. Added Items
Broadway Market by Kwik:
Angela Schumann explained that two parcels in this area are available for development.
Those areas were slated to be a retail center and a bank, but approvals have since lapsed.
Potential Multi -Unit Housing Proiect on the East Side of Monticello:
Angela Schumann stated no formal applications have been submitted to the City, but
inquiries have been received on the south side of the City.
Other:
Commissioner Simpson asked if any requests for the McDonald's site have been
received. Schumann stated that no inquires have been received for this property.
Commissioner Simpson also asked when Mills Fleet Farm would begin construction.
Schumann stated that the applicant has received all City approvals. It is currently in the
hands of the property owner and the developer.
5. Adjournment
SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:20 P.M. LINDA
BUCHMANN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4 -0.
7
Recorder: Jacob Thunander
Approved: October 4, 2016
% EZIM /5,9119,
Angela Scf*m�nt, Cpmmunity Development Director