Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 04-25-2016AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, April 25, 2016 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center SPECIAL MEETING Academy Room 5 p.m. City Council Quarterly Workshop - 95th Street Extension - Flashing Yellow Arrow's at Mayor Intersections ** *CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVING PHOTO TAKEN BEFORE MEETING Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Regular Meeting Minutes from April 11 C. Consideration of Adding Items to Agenda D. Citizen Comments E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • Recycling Day— April 30, 2016 • Update on TH 25 /CSAH 75 Construction Schedule F. Council Liaison Updates • FiberNet Advisory Board • EDA • MCC Advisory Board • Personnel Committee • MOAA • Safety Committee G. Department Updates • Street Department Update • City Administrator Update 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration to approve payment of bills B. Consideration to approve new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration to approve the sale /disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration to adopt Resolution 2016 -027 authorizing conveyance of City property to the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority by Quit Claim Deed for Outlot A, Otter Creek Crossings 1St Addition and Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossings 3rd Addition E. Consideration to approve applications for temporary on -sale liquor licenses for the Monticello Lions Club for Riverfest Community Celebration events on July 16 and 17, 2016 F. Consideration to approve changes and Ordinance amendments to certain City Board and Commissions G. Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 638 amending the Therapeutic Massage Enterprises and Massage Therapists ordinance by amending Section 3 -18 -2: Definitions H. Consideration to approve a Special Event Permit for a 5K Run/Walk on September 24, 2016, sponsored by Party for a Purpose to benefit the Monticello Cancer Center. Applicant: Party for a Purpose /Thurber, Tara I. Consideration to approve a request for an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Development and Final Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) and approval of development agreement for Jerry Hartung Addition for a single lot development in the B -4 (Regional Business) District. Applicant: Retail Partners Monticello, LLC J. Consideration to approve Resolution 2016 -022 authorizing the application for MnDOT Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program K. Consideration to approve Resolution 2016 -023 to Advance Municipal State Aid funds for the 2016 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 15C001 and TH 25/7th Street Project, City Project No. 15C004 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings A. Consideration to approve Resolution 2016 -024 accepting Part 2 of the City of Monticello Wellhead Protection Plan for submission to the Minnesota Departr of Health 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration to accept the Northwest Monticello Interchange Land Use Study for inclusion in the Northwest Interchange Study B. Consideration of a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a multiple family attached housing project in the Central Community District (CCD). Applicant: Masters Fifth Avenue 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, April 11, 2016 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, and Glen Posusta Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Brian Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. with a quorum present. The pledge of allegiance was recited. B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from March 28, 2016. Tom Perrault moved approval of the special meeting minutes with a minor change. Charlotte Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. • Regular Meeting Minutes from March 28, 2016. Charlotte Gabler moved approval of the minutes as amended. Tom Perrault seconded. Motion carried unanimously. C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda • Glen Posusta added discussion on trees /landscaping at the Wastewater Treatment Facility. D. Citizen Comments • None. E. Public Service Announcements • Mayor Stumpf read a Proclamation honoring Terry Tomann Day and presented it to Don Tomann. Evan Bauernschmitt, Ultra Machining Company (UMC), addressed the City Council and noted the tree planting to be completed by UMC. • Rachel Leonard, Communications Coordinator, provided a brief update on City staff's Community Engagement efforts and the results of the included events. • Rachel Leonard noted that there will be a tree planting event sponsored by Wright County at the Bertram Chain of Lakes on April 30. The event begins at 10 a.m. and the group will be planting approximately 6,000 seedlings. City Council Minutes —April 11, 2016 Page 1 1 4 • Rachel Leonard provided a construction update on the TH25 /CSAH 75 project. The start date of this project is scheduled for April 18. Brian Stumpf communicated that certain informational signs may need to be changed. Bret Weis, WSB Engineering, will look into the signs and adjust as appropriate. Brian Stumpf also questioned if the traffic signal at River Street was going to be turned off as requested. Bret Weis responded that he will notify the City Engineer of this request. F. Council Liaison Updates • BCOL — Brian Stumpf provided an update of the meeting that included discussion on the following items: land purchase; athletic fields; triathlon; Friends of Bertram's Phase II of the playground; clean -up day in May; and the summer program brochure. • Brian Stumpf noted that the Local Board of Appeals and Equalization hearing was held on April 7. • IEDC — Angela Schumann, Community Development Director, provided a brief update of the meeting. She noted that the group received a recap of a subcommittee meeting held in regard to land inventory. She also mentioned that the group adopted their work plan for the upcoming year. • Planning Commission — Charlotte Gabler noted that the Planning Commission discussed a Conditional Use Permit and certain land use. G. Department Updates • Tracy Ergen, Human Resources Director, gave a brief presentation on the HR Department and its current activity. 2. Consent Agenda Glen Posusta moved approval of the Consent Agenda excluding items B, E, and G. Charlotte Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,158,439.93. B. Consideration of approving new hires /departures. Recommendation: ITEM WAS PULLED OFF OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. C. Consideration of approving the sale /disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: Approved the sale /disposal of surplus property as identified in the included list. D. Consideration to approve a Temporary On -Sale Liquor License and a Charitable Gambling Permit for Church of St. Henry for an event to be held August 27 and 28, 2016. Recommendation: Approved the applications for a temporary 2- day liquor license pending receipt of certificate of insurance showing liquor City Council Minutes —April 11, 2016 Page 2 1 4 liability coverage and the charitable gambling permit for the Church of St. Henry's Fall Festival to be held on church grounds on August 27 -28, 2016. E. Consideration to approve Resolution 2016 -020 approving a donation from run sponsor Belde Chiropractic and movie sponsor FiberNet Monticello. Recommendation: ITEM WAS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. F. Consideration to waive statutory liability limits for City insurance renewals. Recommendation: Approved to deny waiving the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statute 466.014. G. Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 634 amending Section 6 to allow Beekeeping in the City of Monticello and to adopt Summary Ordinance 634A for publication and approve Ordinance No. 635 amending the Fee Schedule. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion. B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City Departments. Brian Stumpf pulled the item and thanked DJ Hennesey, Building Inspector, for his years of service. Mr. Hennesey is moving on from the City of Monticello. Charlotte Gabler moved approval of the new hires and departures. Lloyd Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -2; Tom Perrault and Glen Posusta voted against because they were not in favor of hiring an EDA Manager. E. Consideration to approve Resolution 2016 -020 approving a donation from Run Sponsor Belde Chiropractic and Movie Sponsor FiberNet Monticello. Brian Stumpf pulled the item to acknowledge the sponsors. Charlotte Gabler moved approval of the donations. Lloyd Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -1; Tom Perrault voted against because he did not support FiberNet Monticello making a donation for the movie. G. Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 634 amending Section 6 to allow Beekeeping in the City of Monticello and to adopt Summary Ordinance 634A for publication and approve Ordinance No. 635 amending the Fee Schedule. Tom Perrault pulled the item and brought forward a concern in regard to notification of neighbors. He thought that notification should be provided to a further distance than adjacent neighbors. It was suggested a notification of City Council Minutes —April 11, 2016 Page 3 1 4 property owners that lived within 200 ft. of the applicant. Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk, noted that this change could be made. Tom Perrault moved approval of the Ordinance amendment to allow Beekeeping in the City of Monticello as amended (notification to property owners within 200 feet of the applicant) and to adopt the Summary Ordinance and an Ordinance amending the Fee Schedule. Glen Posusta seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration to adopt a Highway 25 Coalition Joint Powers Agreement There was some discussion on which City Council member should serve on the Coalition. Both Mayor Stumpf and Tom Perrault noted their interest. Charlotte Gabler moved to appoint Brian Stumpf. Glen Posusta seconded the motion. Charlotte Gabler rescinded her motion. Charlotte Gabler moved approval of appointing Tom Perrault to the Coalition. Tom Perrault seconded the motion. Motion failed 2 -3; Lloyd Hilgart, Glen Posusta, and Brian Stumpf voted against. Charlotte Gabler moved approval of appointing Brian Stumpf to the Coalition. Glen Posusta seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -1; Tom Perrault voted against. Charlotte Gabler moved approval of the agreement. Tom Perrault seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. ADDED DISCUSSION • Glen Posusta discussed planting trees and/or implementing a landscaping plan at the Wastewater Treatment Facility. He mentioned that he thought there should be some type of natural screening along the building and, even further, along the road. There was a consensus of the City Council to direct staff to investigate the options for such a plan. By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 7:32 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes —April 11, 2016 Page 4 14 �1 ►11[M��[! D c C Plil I D Oak j h r!� Mission Statement The mission of the Monticello Street Department is to provide professional, timely and comprehensive support services responsive to the needs of our community by maintaining the streets, parking lots, street lights and storm water system in satisfactory condition so as not to affect the safety, health and welfare of the citizens. The Street Department employs 7 full -time and 3 seasonal workers. Staff maintains 70 miles of streets and boulevards, parking lots, street light systems, street signs, sidewalks, snow removal, multiple outlots throughout the City, and the storm water system including ponds, ditches, swales, catch basins, manholes, outf alts, and multiple culverts. The department is also responsible for buildings and/or grounds maintenance at 4 different locations. Finally, staff manages the maintenance shop and all repairs made on all vehicles and equipment in the Public Works Department. Mon�tif�Ae&o •Sign Replacement in the SW Quad of the City • (West of Highway 25 and South of I -94) • To comply with the new Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) retroreflectivity sign regulations. T �� I j 1;1 0� IEL �. rONE WAY i� • Well No. 5 Driveway Blacktop Blacktop Riverside Cemetery Driveway • Crack Sealing • Crack sealing is performed by staff prior to the annual chip sealing (sealcoating) project to prep the road surface for the chip sealing process. • Hot pour crack sealant is a waterproof, flexible blend of asphalts, oils, polymers, plasticizers, rubber and mineral content. • It is used to seal cracks in asphalt to keep water and debris from penetrating and deteriorating the pavement. • In 2015, staff used a total of 29,580 pounds of sealer on the following areas: • 7th Street West, 7th Street East, Chelsea Road East • Highland Way, Klein Farms North, Featherstone • In 2016, staff plans to use a total of 35,210 pounds of sealer. CITY OF MontieRo • Chip Sealing (or Sealcoating) • Chip sealing or sealcoating is a street maintenance program performed annually. • The road surface is sprayed with an emulsified hot asphalt and covered with a layer of crushed trap rock. • Streets are swept of excess rock within a week. • Streets are fog sealed with emulsified asphalt. • Following the chip sealing. • This process extends the life of the road surface by protecting it from wear and premature deterioration. • The 2015 chip seal project consisted of 102,204 square yards of city streets. • The 2016 Chi p Project Seal � PROPOSED 2016 04n. CHIP SEAL PROJECT �4 RIVER MILL EFi 7<1'IU _ Cl MRL'R.IJN Ila FIVER FCIREST E7R q I L co I RIVER `. CT PrrVEII FOREST }. CROSSING &1tE f T °� h uu s C � , • includes 109,708 square yards of City Streets �'-•F:`s,` �.: r �_. �, ,�:�. .w . _.....rte.. V y r 1 r ^ • 1 4bw ► lift- r } .y� Storm Water Maintenance The Street Department is responsible for maintaining storm water retention ponds, manholes, catch basins, culverts and ditches, allowing storm water to flow throughout the City at designed safe levels. D a POND 5 storm water maintenance 74 log v k � �i �.'ar L 6 f •� f �Y D ML) EF �j storm water pond •TIMBER RIDGE maintenance MEADOW OAK storm water issue Y •Cleaning up after the Beavers r a s i o aJ�,7y�1p. �.�. ..r F i' ru. r Parking Lc --v i� -A 0 L0 PARKING LOTS • River St W & Walnut St • Broadway - Downtown • Prairie Center • MCC • DMV • Commuter Parking Lot • FiberNet • Walnut St &3rdStW • Hi -Way Liquor • Senior Center • City Hall • Food Shelf • Public Works What We Maintain • Lights • Landscaping • Cu rb • Sweeping • Pavement • Snow Plowing U 0 404LIB � Cl I d Wr011eftille Ice and Snow The Street Department is responsible for the control of snow and ice on City streets, sidewalks and City owned parking lots. We will provide control in a safe and cost effective manner, keeping in mind safety, budget, personnel and environmental concerns. CITY OF 1' onti�e to •Snow Events in 2015 • The average snowfall for Monticello in one season is 54 inches. • A total of 40 inches of snow fell in 2015, in which there were 14 plow events (of 2" or more) with full crews dispatched. • A total of 534 tons of salt was used in 2015. • A total of 285 tons of sand was used in 2015. M • Snow Events in 2016 • A total of 26 inches of snow fell in 2016, in which there were 9 plow events (of 2" or more) with full crews dispatched. • A total of 300 tons of salt was used in 2016. • A total of 150 tons of sand was used in 2016. • Comparing snow events from 2015 to 2016, the city realized a cost savings in the Ice & Snow Budget as follows: • $18,500 saved in salt and sand. � - • $1,500 saved in fuel costs. • Totaling $20,000 in savings! ■ V� we Apo AbTAh a 0 griti rig :uffivalr. Street Lighting Maintenance The Street Department is City of Monticello p• Monitor all Street Lights • Notify Proper Authority responsible for monitoring • Assist Electrical Contractors on Repairs all street lights within the City and notifying the City of Street Monticello Light proper authority when 25% Ownership repairs are needed, and assist with repairs as Xcel Energy requested. 55% Wright Hennepin Electric 20% CM 0 F LM o ik Flo • Broadway Streetscape Lights • The City owns 245 Street Lights. • Some of the more notable lights are in the streetscape along the Broadway corridor. • When accidents occur, the City notifies the proper authorities and works to get the lights and/or poles repaired or replaced. FAi Aw, 49W a J�]l[ :u�ua�rur��� • Stoplight Maintenance We co- maintain 13 intersections in Monticello. This includes re- lamping as needed. And maintenance of the structure. �I I qr it M, a tip and Garagt. .s •4 � 1 ,J YY +o r Shop and Garage The Street Department is responsible for maintaining City vehicles and equipment for multiple departments including the Street, Parks, Water and Sewer Departments, and the DMV in a safe and efficient manner. Over 163 Vehicles & ieces J of Equipment ontl efl[� • In -House Body Work on Equipment f.t- Flo,9 Lj: i�iiiT�'i'�ii7r Taw I t 0 .0 Pt - —..i Street Sweeping J VOW r I� I �I ar 0% iC11�1F.117:i]iF "Wills, dp 4F" '4 APPO Awl kw aIrutK: B3!cm r ,rt 1 ZO 4 - -- ienair n M _ a i1F17:rd re7w, 0.111100kvAr. .? Ab dw Painting Crosswalks ti� lift 9 Fl 0 3itumfna t. iw .. wav Cc 0' OL 1 71 10- -law- BW ,.-Ora Aike, A Blacktopping and Patching Streets � ' 1 e 1 P'S rot aN1 1 � • z � '+ { � �';.f ' `�' it %} +, I.a5`,�;��,.'�r;� �ti� .„� ;a 4MGe�iil��.��.�yiirr ► °; �''�,, �� �;�,:�� yip 777777 d',h' ,��y }' ,1 i ` ; „r .� 1 • � �. � h �rr� � l.�''' � _ ' `�'"i '� _yam w~ `� .'�_ •t "�. ;�..� ��I ..t��µ�y� � " -+�,�i � °��'R �, v w. �-f� �- _ �-. '- .. * -t - .F , ,� yrt _ w-�� 'SN- �� -' '' � � ':'•• — a#9L�',v” ; {�. .i -. - y-i k�.�4 ... .$, "Cf r . �1 ���, y�i - Y��p� �.r,�, - . fir. \1F - - •� _ .. Flail owing h �f - 7711 v W, I a WXVIS-wom �! W i aintain k....umpusting r-6 i y y c A16 :1[t agog 'AMYAM %iN- 1 MM • Li UY 71� ■mr i r� . p f l bmbi cI I Y 0 x t� Monti6eno PUGLJ+C WORKS vr City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 2A. Consideration to approve the payment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $577,696.10. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Bill registers Purchase Card registers List of Commonly Coded AP Funds Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 04/20/2016 - 11:57AM Batch: 00203.04.2016 - 00203.04.2016 AP Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 3974 A+ TAXI OF MONTICELLO INC Check Sequence: 1 20130944 March 2016 - 900 rides 3,333.33 04/26/2016 10145178- 431990 Check Total: 3,333.33 Vendor: 1039 AQUA LOGIC INC Check Sequence: 2 44707 Square Flange 1 HP Motor (to be returned); Seal 570.78 04/26/2016 226 - 45122- 421610 44716 Pool Chemical Strainers (4) 101.12 04/26/2016 226- 45122- 421610 Check Total: 671.90 Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Check Sequence: 3 3091841 resale - beer 168.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 3093234 resale - beer 107.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 275.00 Vendor: 1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 4 372651 (30) gal Chev Delo Torgforce10; (10)gal chev m 640.30 04/26/2016 101 - 43127 - 421300 Check Total: 640.30 Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 5 53060500 resale - wine 328.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 53060500 freight 10.80 04/26/2016 609- 49750- 433300 Check Total: 338.80 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 6 108356 resale - soda pop 56.25 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 108356 resale juice 32.80 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 108357 resale -beer 1,533.70 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 108982 resale - pop, water, juice 598.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 111254 resale - soda pop 22.50 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 111254 resale -juice 16.40 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 111255 resale - beer 859.95 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 111880 resale - pop, juice, water 550.60 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 11866 Coffee 245.52 04/26/2016 101 - 41940 - 421990 11866 Resale- Coffee 43.68 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 83359 resale -beer credit -29.60 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 3,929.80 Vendor: 2535 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY Check Sequence: 7 911071282 PX1- 001 -CZD- CZD- 10- 100F;(2)7517;(7)5017; 623.03 04/26/2016 656- 49877 - 421990 Check Total: 623.03 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIF Check Sequence: 8 1080456207 resale - liquor 1,673.47 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1080456207 resale - wine 520.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 1080456207 resale - wine na 36.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1080456207 freight 43.04 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1080458962 resale - liquor 1,107.37 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1080458962 resale- wine 304.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 1080458962 resale - wine na 36.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1080458962 freight 19.40 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 3,739.28 Vendor: 2047 BRIDGE WATER TELEPHONE COMPANY Check Sequence: 9 0665FNMT -16104 Voice - Monthly Access Charge Interstate - 4/13- 520.23 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430910 Check Total: 520.23 Vendor: 1749 CALIX NETWORKS INC Check Sequence: 10 1152424 utx - (25) GigaCenter 7,518.94 04/26/2016 656- 49877 - 421800 Check Total: 7,518.94 Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Check Sequence: 11 2348 -000G 164 March 2016 - FiberNet Legal 1,500.00 04/26/2016 656- 49870 - 430400 2348 -000G 164 March 2016 - General Legal 1,936.97 04/26/2016 101 - 41610- 430400 2348 -000G 164 March 2016 - Planning & Zoning 300.00 04/26/2016 101 - 41910 - 430400 2348 -000G 164 March 2016 - EDA 75.00 04/26/2016 213 - 46301 - 430400 2348 -OOOG 164 March 2016 - Hi Way Liquor 300.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49754- 431990 2348 -OOIG 99 General - Code Enforcement - March 2016 225.00 04/26/2016 101 - 42400 - 430400 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 4,336.97 Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC Check Sequence: 12 375 -21 resale - beer 110.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 110.00 Vendor: 2213 CBS TV STATIONS Check Sequence: 13 033116 WCCO March 2016 1,282.05 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 1,282.05 Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 14 00931061 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (361 lbs) 98.20 04/26/2016 226 - 45122- 421600 Check Total: 98.20 Vendor: 2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 15 L04003703716099 4/8- 5/7/2016- Local Usage 95.33 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430910 R72010610616099 4/8- 5/7/2016 - Private Line Transport 600.00 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430910 R97006006016099 4/8- 5/7/2016 - Mo. Access Charge 144.84 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430910 Check Total: 840.17 Vendor: 1973 CLIMATE MAKERS INC Check Sequence: 16 52483 Innovent System Check - Pool Unit 916.15 04/26/2016 226 - 45122- 440440 Check Total: 916.15 Vendor: 4347 CONSOLIDATED TELECOMMUNICATIONS Check Sequence: 17 INV -3073 IRET Apartment Building Design 300.00 04/26/2016 656- 49870 - 431990 Check Total: 300.00 Vendor: 3831 RAELYNN COOK Check Sequence: 18 4/19/2016 Mileage to APA Chapter Meeting (64.6 miles) 34.88 04/26/2016 101 - 41520- 433100 Check Total: 34.88 Vendor: 4401 DUSTIN CRAIG Check Sequence: 19 03212016 Super8 - 3/18/2016; (184) miles Alexandria Tech 277.90 04/26/2016 101 - 42200- 433100 Check Total: 277.90 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 20 1196316 resale - beer 633.45 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1196316 resale - beer n/a 33.60 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 124627 resale - beer 670.80 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 124845 resale - beer 152.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1248571 resale - beer credit - 334.40 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 124885 resale - beer 13,207.92 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 124885 resale - beer n/a 101.65 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 124938 resale - beer - Inv 124885 correction 26.80 04/26/2016 609 - 49750 - 425200 124981 resale - beer credit -80.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 125260 resale - beer 162.40 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 14,574.22 Vendor: 4415 RONDA EATROS Check Sequence: 21 4/15/2016 Zumba Sub Instructor (3 Classes /1 hr ea) 4/7, 4/1 75.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430120 Check Total: 75.00 Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 22 533318 Wellhead Protection Plan Meeting PHN Ad #533 101.53 04/26/2016 601 - 49440 - 435100 Check Total: 101.53 Vendor: 3681 STERLING EGAN Check Sequence: 23 4/15/2016 Referee Mens Hockey - 4 Games - 4/10/16 160.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 4/18/2016 Referee Mens Hockey - 4 Games - 4/17/16 160.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 4/18/2016 Referee Mens Hockey - 2 Games - 4/14/16 80.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 Check Total: 400.00 Vendor: 1165 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE Check Sequence: 24 85132 Engine 1 - NFPA Pump Test; Full Serv. Inspec. 1,377.57 04/26/2016 101 - 42200 - 440500 85133 Engine 4 - Full Service/Emergency Inspection SE 1,250.27 04/26/2016 101 - 42200 - 440500 85134 Tender 3 - Full Service/Emergency Inspection 810.88 04/26/2016 101 - 42200 - 440500 85135 Ladder I - NFPA Pump Test; Full Serv. Inspec. 2,545.65 04/26/2016 101 - 42200 - 440500 86229 Tender T -7 - NFPA Pump Test; Full Serv. Inspec 1,207.26 04/26/2016 101 - 42200 - 440500 Check Total: 7,191.63 Vendor: 4239 ENVENTIS CORPORATION Check Sequence: 25 1219503- 04/2016 Consolidated Comm- April 2016 Gigabite Trans] 7,648.39 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430930 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 0184622 (650) R900 V4 Wall MIU Check Total Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH 4/1/2016 CIty Hall Phone April 2016 4/1/2016 MCC Phone April 2016 4/1/2016 Ballfields Phone April 2016 4/1/2016 DMV Phone April 2016 4/1/2016 Hi Way Liquor Phone April 2016 4/1/2016 Fire Hall Phone April 2016 4/1/2016 Public Works Phone April 2016 4/1/2016 Parks Phone April 2016 4/1/2016 Prairie Center Phone April 2016 4/1/2016 Sheriff Phone April 2016 4/1/2016 City Hall Internet April 2016 4/1/2016 MCC Internet April 2016 4/1/2016 Ballfields Internet April 2016 4/1/2016 DMV Internet April 2016 4/1/2016 Hi Way Liquor Internet April 2016 4/1/2016 Fire Hall Liquor Internet April 2016 4/1/2016 Animal Shelter Liquor Internet April 2016 4/1/2016 Public Works Internet April 2016 4/1/2016 Sheriff Internet April 2016 4/1/2016 City Hall Cable April 2016 4/1/2016 MCC Cable April 2016 4/1/2016 City Hall Data Hosting April 2016 4/1/2016 City Hall Service Contract April 2016 Check Total: Vendor: 1180 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES INC FL00145154 DOT Urine Drug Screen - M. Haaland Check Total: Vendor: 2222 FOX SPORTS NET INC K42735 FSN March 2016 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 7,648.39 Check Sequence: 26 69,641.00 04/26/2016 601 - 49440 - 422701 69,641.00 4,374.72 Check Sequence: 28 47.95 04/26/2016 101 - 43120 - 431990 47.95 Check Sequence: 29 4,678.97 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Sequence: 27 993.54 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 618.16 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 19.51 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 262.59 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 279.96 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 242.83 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 285.32 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 113.95 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 20.74 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 68.78 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 99.95 04/26/2016 702- 00000 - 432300 10.00 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 10.00 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 41.95 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 41.95 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 41.95 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 29.95 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 69.95 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 41.95 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 12.30 04/26/2016 101- 41310- 431990 319.39 04/26/2016 226 - 45122- 432500 500.00 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 431900 250.00 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 431900 4,374.72 Check Sequence: 28 47.95 04/26/2016 101 - 43120 - 431990 47.95 Check Sequence: 29 4,678.97 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Check Total: 4,678.97 Vendor: 2462 FOX TELEVISION STATIONS INC Check Sequence: 30 033116 WFTC March 2016 207.90 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 033116 -2 KMSP March 2016 1,178.10 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 1,386.00 Vendor: 4419 STEPHEN GEORGE Check Sequence: 31 4/7/2016 Refund 2016 Farmers Market Vendor Fee 83.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45122- 347560 Check Total: 83.00 Vendor: 4391 WIL GOETSCH Check Sequence: 32 4/15/2016 Referee Mens Hockey - 2 Games - 4/13/16 80.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 4/18/2016 Referee Mens Hockey - 2 Games - 4/14/16 80.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 Check Total: 160.00 Vendor: 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 33 6030571 March 2016 (86) locates -1/2 Water 62.35 04/26/2016 601 - 49440 - 432770 6030571 March 2016 (86) locates -1/2 FNM 62.35 04/26/2016 656- 49877 - 432770 Check Total: 124.70 Vendor: 1206 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Check Sequence: 34 3078 resale - wine 743.25 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 Check Total: 743.25 Vendor: 2895 GREATER MN PARKS AND TRAILS Check Sequence: 35 3/28/2016 Legislative Action Day Registration 3/23/16 AS 20.00 04/26/2016 101 - 41910- 433100 Check Total: 20.00 Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC Check Sequence: 36 819605 resale - beer 184.50 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 184.50 Vendor: 2305 HOME BOX OFFICE Check Sequence: 37 033116 HBO March 2016 114.52 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 033116 HBO Bulk March 2016 278.04 04/26/2016 656- 49879- 430920 033116 Max March 2016 45.36 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Check Total: 437.92 Vendor: 1244 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Check Sequence: 38 160324019 12' Straight Pool for Pool 77.80 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 421750 160328021 Pool Chemicals 1,006.62 04/26/2016 226 - 45122- 421600 Check Total: 1,084.42 Vendor: 2214 HUBBARD BROADCASTING INC Check Sequence: 39 03312016 KSTP March 2016 1,559.25 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 03312016 -2 KSTC March 2016 242.55 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 1,801.80 Vendor: 4332 INTERSTATE TELCOM CONSULTING, INC Check Sequence: 40 36223 Jan. 2016 - Tariff filing; usage Reporting; Teleco 1,605.46 04/26/2016 656- 49870 - 431970 Check Total: 1,605.46 Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING Check Sequence: 41 2491349 resale - beer 2,126.47 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 2491349 resale - beer na 61.40 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 Check Total: 2,187.87 Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Check Sequence: 42 5408224 resale - liquor 1,791.01 04/26/2016 609- 49750- 425100 5408224 freight 19.69 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5408225 resale - wine 1,143.25 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5408225 freight 28.80 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5409686 freight 36.53 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5409686 resale - liquor 3,428.11 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5409687 resale- wine 1,607.95 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5409687 resale - mix 36.35 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 5409687 freight 32.40 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5409688 resale - beer 246.00 04/26/2016 609- 49750- 425200 5412239 freight 39.12 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5412239 resale - liquor 3,720.98 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5412240 resale - wine 509.85 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5412240 freight 15.84 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5413504 freight 25.43 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5413504 resale - liquor 2,180.06 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5413505 resale- wine 1,759.10 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 5413505 resale- wine na 73.35 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 5413505 freight 57.60 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5413506 resale - beer 65.97 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 5414836 resale - liquor 1,120.46 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5414836 freight 11.99 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5414837 freight 24.48 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5414837 resale - wine 1,066.24 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5414837 resale - wine n/a 33.75 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 5417631 resale - liquor 1,139.71 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5417631 freight 14.40 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5417632 freight 20.16 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5417632 resale- wine 733.80 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 569234 resale - liquor credit inv #5393855 - 144.00 04/26/2016 609- 49750- 425100 569234 freight credit inv #5393855 -1.44 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 569235 freight credit inv # 5404139 -1.44 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 569235 resale - wine credit inv # 5404139 -47.90 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 569856 resale - wine credit inv # 5361417 -6.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 569857 resale - wine credit inv # 5376786 -10.25 04/26/2016 609 - 49750 - 425100 569858 resale - mix credit inv # 5378196 -3.52 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 569859 resale - wine credit inv # 5399024 -4.14 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 570157 resale- liquor credit inv. 5409686 -72.04 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 570357 freight credit inv. #5412239 -14.40 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 570357 resale - liquor credit inv. #5412239 - 1,719.90 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 570513 resale- wine credit inv. #5413505 -49.65 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 Check Total: 18,907.70 Vendor: 1741 KENNETH KAKO Check Sequence: 43 01/23/16 Big Lake Fire Training lunch 11.32 04/26/2016 101 - 42200 - 433100 Check Total: 11.32 Vendor: 1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED Check Sequence: 44 MN190 -00101 General Legal Matters Through 2/29/16 76.00 04/26/2016 101 - 41910 - 430400 MN 190-00101 General EDA Legal Matters Through 2/29/16 609.81 04/26/2016 213 - 46301 - 430400 MN190 -00101 General Legal Matters Through 3/31/16 57.00 04/26/2016 213 - 46301- 430400 MN190 -00101 TIF 1 -35 General Legal Matters Through 3/31/11 380.00 04/26/2016 213 - 46535- 430400 Check Total: 1,122.81 Vendor: 2626 HARRY LANTTO Check Sequence: 45 April 2016 Planning Commission Meeting Recording 4/5/1 60.00 04/26/2016 101 - 41910- 431990 April 2016 City Council Meeting Recording 4/11/16 60.00 04/26/2016 101 - 41110 - 431990 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Check Total: 120.00 Vendor: 3852 LASER MEMORIES Check Sequence: 46 960 Name Tags for Staff (9) 72.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45122- 421990 Check Total: 72.00 Vendor: 1300 DOUGLAS WILLIAM LYSENG Check Sequence: 47 1335 Replacement Computer for JH @ PW 1,231.80 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 424100 Check Total: 1,231.80 Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON LLP Check Sequence: 48 214526 resale - tobacco; soda pop; cork scrws; can coole 486.35 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 214526 resale - cigarettes; juice 870.88 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 Check Total: 1,357.23 Vendor: 1229 MARRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 49 1297 Business Cards - MR 54.25 04/26/2016 101 - 43115- 421990 Check Total: 54.25 Vendor: 1308 MARCO INC Check Sequence: 50 302506209 4/10/16 - 5110116 Contract 5,078.52 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 441500 Check Total: 5,078.52 Vendor: 2215 METRO GOLDWYN MAYER INC Check Sequence: 51 033116 MGM March 2016 91.16 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 91.16 Vendor: 1932 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT CO Check Sequence: 52 773235 swing sgl. leg 8'; Gen Swing Seat; post for thera 2,073.92 04/26/2016 101 - 45201- 440800 Check Total: 2,073.92 Vendor: 2217 MLB NETWORK LLC AFFILIATE SALE Check Sequence: 53 063479 MLB March 2016 261.45 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 261.45 Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 54 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number April 2016 Monthly Allocation - April 2016 4,730.00 04/26/2016 101 - 45175- 444310 Check Total: 4,730.00 Vendor: 1379 MONTICELLO UMPIRES ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 55 Apr -May Umpires Mens Softball Games 4/25 - 5/30/16 (47 1,316.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 Check Total: 1,316.00 Vendor: 2396 MICHAEL MOSSEY Check Sequence: 56 03212016 -2 Big Lake Fire Training lunch- 1/23/16 8.08 04/26/2016 101- 42200 - 433100 Check Total: 8.08 Vendor: 1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Check Sequence: 57 1056421 Toro 4100- (2) Tires; (4) bearing -ball 114.32 04/26/2016 101 - 45201- 422100 Check Total: 114.32 Vendor: 4390 MICHAEL MUELLER Check Sequence: 58 4/19/2016 Referee Mens Hockey - 1 Game - 4/18/16 40.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 4/8/2016 Referee Mens Hockey - 4 Games - 4/6/16 160.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 Check Total: 200.00 Vendor: 2218 MUSIC CHOICE Check Sequence: 59 033116 Music Choice March 2016 326.07 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 326.07 Vendor: 2072 NATIONAL TELCO TELEVISION CONSORT_ Check Sequence: 60 4158 March 2016 service 33,894.78 04/26/2016 656- 49879- 430920 Check Total: 33,894.78 Vendor: 2082 NEUSTAR INC Check Sequence: 61 M10835281 Acct;19894 Local # Portability 3/1 -31/16 345.00 04/26/2016 656- 49870 - 431990 Check Total: 345.00 Vendor: 2216 NHL NETWORK Check Sequence: 62 033116 NHL SD March 2016 209.16 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 209.16 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 1687 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC Check Sequence: 63 4449 EDA - Manufacturing Expansion Project 510.00 04/26/2016 213 - 46301- 431990 Check Total: 510.00 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 64 22285 ZSOLAR - March 2016 - Technical Assistance 3,340.10 04/26/2016 101 - 41910- 431990 22285 March 2016 - Technical Assistance - Sign Ordin, 236.70 04/26/2016 101 - 41910- 431990 22285 March 2016 - Technical Assistance - General 2,377.30 04/26/2016 101 - 41910 - 431990 22286 ZMSPUD - Tech Assist - March 2016 - Landmar 3,828.50 04/26/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 22286 ZVERIZ - Tech Assist - March 2016 - Verizon R 635.50 04/26/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 22286 Tech Assist - March 2016 - 7th Street Replat 263.50 04/26/2016 101 - 41910 - 431990 22286 ZASPEN - Tech Assist - March 2016 - Aspen Dt 1,347.00 04/26/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 22286 Tech Assist - March 2016 - Sports Training Corn 170.50 04/26/2016 101 - 41910 - 431990 22287 March 2016 - Technical Assistance - Meetings 300.00 04/26/2016 101 - 41910 - 431990 Check Total: 12,499.10 Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 65 53117 Labor - (4) hrs Streetscape pole by Walgreens 312.00 04/26/2016 101 - 43160 - 431990 53117 Material - Fuse- Streetscape pole by Walgreens 19.82 04/26/2016 101 - 43160 - 431990 Check Total: 331.82 Vendor: 2131 ONVOY LLC Check Sequence: 66 160402008669 April 2016 A- links; 800 Dips 1,248.07 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430910 160402009112 Fraud payment #6 of 9 2,072.47 04/26/2016 656- 00000 - 202010 160402009112 April 2016 Wholesale Switching 376.07 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430910 Check Total: 3,696.61 Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 67 8542901 resale - wine 2,325.65 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 8542901 freight 25.00 04/26/2016 609- 49750- 433300 Check Total: 2,350.65 Vendor: 2717 KEITH PETERSON Check Sequence: 68 0411201 (208) miles Nisswa training 112.32 04/26/2016 101- 42200 - 433100 Check Total: 112.32 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 69 234463 resale - wine credit inv # 2951138 -48.00 04/26/2016 609- 49750- 425300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 234463 freight - credit inv # 2951138 -1.44 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 234827 resale liquor- credit inv # 2770170 -35.99 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 234828 resale - winecredit inv # 2907718 -13.35 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 234829 resal - liquor credit inv # 2946681 -6.52 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 234830 resal - liquor credit inv # 2951137 -4.39 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 234831 resal - liquor credit inv # 2953097 -3.88 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2953907 resale - liquor 4,874.99 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2953907 frieght 93.60 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2953908 frieght 20.16 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2953908 resale- wine 812.45 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 2953908 resale - wine n/a 56.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 2954895 resale - liquor 3,793.13 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2954895 freight 50.87 04/26/2016 609- 49750- 433300 2954896 freight 24.59 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2954896 resale - wine 517.85 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 2954896 resale - liquor 194.15 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2954896 resale - mix 79.10 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 2956730 freight 2.88 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2956730 resale - liquor 393.95 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2957499 freight 66.24 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2957499 resale- liquor 5,173.91 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2958455 resale - liquor 898.71 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2958455 freight 11.52 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2958456 freight 15.84 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2958456 resale- wine 525.95 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 2958456 resale - wine n/a 53.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 2960423 freight 5.16 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2960423 resale - liquor 703.72 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 Check Total: 18,254.20 Vendor: 4060 POP MEDIA NETWORKS, LLC POP MEDIA ( Check Sequence: 70 164025 Pop March 2016 489.66 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 489.66 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 71 331109 Freight 7.99 04/26/2016 226 - 45122- 433300 331109 Parry Supplies - Pizzas & Juice 198.39 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 421460 331109 Resale - Concession Food 427.53 04/26/2016 226 - 45127 - 425410 Check Total: 633.91 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 2602 RFD TV Check Sequence: 72 2235 -1216 RFD -TV March 2016 17.55 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 17.55 Vendor: 1474 PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 73 April 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 04/26/2016 101 - 42700 - 431200 Check Total: 1,593.75 Vendor: 3935 SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE Check Sequence: 74 160321 -009 Innovent Unit Verification 984.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45122- 440440 Check Total: 984.00 Vendor: 4075 GARY W SELL, JR Check Sequence: 75 4/15/2016 Referee Mens Hockey - 4 Games - 4/10/16 160.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 4/18/2016 Referee Mens Hockey - 4 Games - 4/17/16 160.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 4/8/2016 Referee Mens Hockey - 4 Games - 4/6/16 160.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 Check Total: 480.00 Vendor: 3675 GARY SETRUM Check Sequence: 76 4/19/2016 Referee Mens Hockey - 3 games - 4/13 & 4/18 120.00 04/26/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 Check Total: 120.00 Vendor: 2301 SHOWTIME NETWORKS INC Check Sequence: 77 201603- 40843608 Showtime March 2016 97.02 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 97.02 Vendor: 2212 SINCLAIR TELEVISION GROUP INC Check Sequence: 78 033116 WUCW -TV March 2016 450.45 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 450.45 Vendor: 3688 SOURCEONE SOLUTIONS LLC Check Sequence: 79 1285 April 2016 Billing (11) inserts 2,000.17 04/26/2016 656- 49870 - 431800 1285 April 2016 Postage 559.14 04/26/2016 656- 49870 - 432200 Check Total: 2,559.31 Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF MINNESO' Check Sequence: 80 1394803 resale - liquor 1,354.26 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1394803 freight 19.60 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1394804 resale- wine 476.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 1394804 freight 8.40 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1397209 resale - liquor 1,539.13 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1397209 freight 21.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1397210 freight 15.40 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1397210 resale- wine 534.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 Check Total: 3,967.79 Vendor: 2603 SPECIALTY TURF & AG, INC Check Sequence: 81 I45118 (4) 50 lbRyegrass; (4) 16 oz Flower seeds; 7 -8 -7 503.00 04/26/2016 101 - 45201- 422500 Check Total: 503.00 Vendor: 3829 STEVE'O'SEPTIC Check Sequence: 82 Jan 2016 Jan 2016 (6) Porta toilet rental /winterization 388.50 04/26/2016 101 - 45201- 431990 March 2016 March 2016 (6) Porta toilet rental /winterization 388.50 04/26/2016 101 - 45201- 431990 Check Total: 777.00 Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 83 665- 837 -0005 Voice - Non Published Number Charges 28.00 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 665- 838 -0000 Voice - Non Published Number Charges 121.77 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 763 - 271 -3230 TDS 100.96 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 763 - 271 -3257 TDS 91.00 04/26/2016 702- 00000 - 432100 763- 295 -2005 TDS 18.13 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 763 - 295 -3714 TDS 330.76 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 763 - 295 -4054 TDS 46.84 04/26/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 Check Total: 737.46 Vendor: 2251 TEGNA/GANNETT CO INC Check Sequence: 84 1064 -1055 TEGNA (Kare -TV) March 2016 1,455.30 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 1,455.30 Vendor: 3608 TELESPHERE SOFTWARE INC Check Sequence: 85 174281 Apr2016 CABS April 2016 600.00 04/26/2016 656- 49870 - 431990 Check Total: 600.00 Vendor: 1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 86 1062807 resale - beer 9,013.21 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1065788 resale - beer 3,124.80 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1065790 resale - beer NA 109.50 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1066140 resale - beer 12,660.66 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1069134 resale - beer na 187.50 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1069135 resale - beer 204.15 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 992495 -3 resale - beer - Short paid inv. 992495 -2 1/29/16 0.50 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 25,300.32 Vendor: 2252 TOWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY Check Sequence: 87 506543 WGN March 2016 184.78 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 184.78 Vendor: 4423 TRAUT WELLS INC Check Sequence: 88 285649 Water Softner Maintenance 2,201.90 04/26/2016 226 - 45122- 440440 Check Total: 2,201.90 Vendor: 3594 TRIMARK Check Sequence: 89 2614196 Asst. brown bags; forks 327.93 04/26/2016 609 - 49754- 421990 Check Total: 327.93 Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 90 4/18/2016 PI 42 - UB Qtr 12016 (3,930 pcs) (1/2) 888.18 04/26/2016 601 - 49440- 432200 4/18/2016 PI 42 - UB Qtr 12016 (3,930 pcs) (1/2) 888.18 04/26/2016 602 - 49490 - 432200 Check Total: 1,776.36 Vendor: 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV L_ Check Sequence: 91 00056782 May 2016 WWTP Operations & Maintenance 60,645.00 04/26/2016 602 - 49480 - 430800 Check Total: 60,645.00 Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 92 1713926 resale - soda pop 141.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1718469 resale - soda pop 193.50 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 Check Total: 334.50 Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 93 0148924 resale- wine 761.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 0148924 resale - liquor 148.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 0148924 resale - beer na 24.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 0148924 freight 18.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 0149472 resale - wine 336.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 0149472 resale - liquor 90.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 0149472 resale - beer na 120.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 0149472 freight 16.50 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 1,513.50 Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC Check Sequence: 94 5477 March 2016 water testing 504.00 04/26/2016 601 - 49440- 422740 Check Total: 504.00 Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC Check Sequence: 95 7741 labor- Replace wall switch Break Rm 68.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49754- 440100 7741 parts- Replace wall switch Break Rm 0.89 04/26/2016 609 - 49754- 440100 7743 Labor- Install Start Button for Pool Pumps 392.00 04/26/2016 226- 45122- 421610 7743 Materials - Start Button Pool Pumps - Wire, Con 46.09 04/26/2016 226 - 45122- 421610 Check Total: 506.98 Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 96 707520 freight credit inv. #7076132 -1.44 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 707520 resale- wine credit inv. #7076132 -70.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 7076132 freight 11.52 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 7076132 resale- wine 790.00 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 7076397 freight 1.44 04/26/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 731.52 Vendor: 2219 WORLD FISHING NETWORK LTD Check Sequence: 97 617 -1013 World Fishing Network March 2016 20.71 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430920 Check Total: 20.71 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR -TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 98 4/13/2016 Court Fines & Fees for March 2016 3,212.38 04/26/2016 101 - 42100 - 430410 April April 2016 Deputies Contract 98,088.00 04/26/2016 101 - 42100 - 430500 Check Total: 101,300.38 Vendor: 4424 WRIGHT COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING Check Sequence: 99 4/18/2016 Land Alteration Permit Fee 350.00 04/26/2016 101 - 41910 - 443990 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 350.00 Vendor: 1907 XO COMMUNICATIONS LLC Check Sequence: 100 281653638 data & internet access- 4/1- 30/2016 2,010.75 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430930 281727784 data & intemet access- 4/1- 30/2016 5,491.63 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430930 Check Total: 7,502.38 Vendor: 2076 ZAYO BANDWIDTH LLC Check Sequence: 101 003293 04/16 4/1- 30/2016 Private Line; cost recovery surcharg 2,478.33 04/26/2016 656- 49879 - 430910 Check Total: 2,478.33 Total for Check Run: 478,764.32 Total of Number of Checks: 101 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 4/25/16 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/20/2016 - 11:57 AM) LIST OF COMMONLY CODED AP FUNDS 101 General 213 EDA 217 DMV 226 Community Center 229 Park/Pathway Dedication 601 Water 602 Sewer 609 Liquor 651 Riverside Cemetery 656 FiberNet 702 Central IT 703 Central Equipment 1 City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 04/14/2016 - 10:07AM Batch: 00201.04.2016 - 00201.04.2016 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4263 CAYAN March 2016 Msarch 2016 credit card machine rental Check Total: Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 4/1/2016 April 2016 Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 59.85 04/15/2016 60949754- 424100 59.85 Check Sequence: 2 1,477.48 Check Total: Vendor: 2439 DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT & ECON DEVELO 7975675 Quarter 1 Unemployment Benefits 7975675 Quarter 1 Unemployment Benefits 7975675 Quarter 1 Unemployment Benefits 7975675 Quarter 1 Unemployment Benefits Check Total: Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 4/1/2016 April 2016 Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 59.85 04/15/2016 60949754- 424100 59.85 Check Sequence: 2 1,477.48 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 414200 2,439.19 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 414200 769.00 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 414200 935.64 04/15/2016 101 - 43111- 414200 5,621.31 Check Sequence: 3 1,908.19 04/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 217066 Check Total: 1,908.19 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 4 4/6/2016 Runnings - (3) rakes; (3)lopper 89.45 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Runnings - tax pd credit -5.75 04/15/2016 101 - 45201 - 421650 4/6/2016 Home Depot - 32 oz spray bottle Zep Pro 4.04 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 421990 4/6/2016 Grady's - caulk 3oz. 5.99 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 422701 4/6/2016 Grady's -pins and sq. bits 8.87 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 421990 4/6/2016 Grady's - rule tape 11.99 04/15/2016 101 - 43110- 421990 4/6/2016 Moon Motors- Polaris Ranger (3) wheel studs /(4 14.43 04/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 422110 4/6/2016 Cub - resale - (40) limes 17.60 04/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 4/6/2016 Grady's - (2) 5pk bulbs 38.45 04/15/2016 609 - 49754- 421990 4/6/2016 Royal Tire - #130 repair parts 38.52 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 422100 4/6/2016 Home Depot - (2) 7/8x6 -12' Cedar; 240pl 9x3 -1/ 47.99 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421990 4/6/2016 Cub - (4) coffee; paper plates; tissue; etc 82.85 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 421990 4/6/2016 Cub - resale - (20) limes; (6) Lemons 14.14 04/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 4/6/2016 Monti Vacuum Center- PW 19.95 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 421990 4/6/2016 Monti Napa - turbine oil wells #2 & 4 45.40 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 421300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/14/2016 - 10:07 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 4/6/2016 Johns Auto Elec - Chestnut Lift Gen- voltage reg 92.50 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 422100 4/6/2016 Arctic Glacier - resale - inv. 1958605410 117.43 04/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 4/6/2016 Runnings -Vise All Terrain 6" traileribench 159.91 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422510 4/6/2016 Applied MSS- (2) 12pk blk gloss paint 204.76 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 421510 4/6/2016 PayPal- Otterbox for Druid Maxx 16.99 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 421990 4/6/2016 Amazon - Ink - Blue (2) 114.38 04/15/2016 101 - 41940 - 421990 4/6/2016 Tasc - 4/1/2016 - 4/30/2016 Admin Fees 76.50 04/15/2016 101 - 49240 - 413500 4/6/2016 Monticello Chamber of Commerce - 2016 Dues 165.00 04/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220150 4/6/2016 Randy's Sanitation - March 2016 Shredding DM 15.90 04/15/2016 217 - 41990 - 431990 4/6/2016 Randy's Sanitation - March 2016 Shredding CH 15.90 04/15/2016 101 - 41940 - 431990 4/6/2016 Verizon - Feb 4 - Mar 3 101.54 04/15/2016 101 - 42400 - 432100 4/6/2016 Verizon - Feb 4 - Mar 3 94.94 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 432100 4/6/2016 Verizon - Feb 4 - Mar 3 104.94 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 432100 4/6/2016 Verizon - Feb 4 - Mar 3 46.04 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 432100 4/6/2016 Verizon - Feb 4 - Mar 3 46.05 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 432100 4/6/2016 Verizon - Jan 21 - Feb 20 26.02 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 432100 4/6/2016 Verizon - Jan 21 - Feb 20 140.04 04/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 432100 4/6/2016 Verizon - Jan 11 - Feb 10 25.02 04/15/2016 101 - 43115- 432100 4/6/2016 Verizon - Jan 11 - Feb 10 8.34 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 432100 4/6/2016 Verizon. -Jan 11 -Feb 10 8.34 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 432100 4/6/2016 Verizon - Jan 11 - Feb 10 8.34 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 432100 4/6/2016 Nat'l Public Employers Labor - Online Group Tr. 99.00 04/15/2016 101 - 41800 - 431960 4/6/2016 Constant Contact - Phone App for Email Formati 79.00 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 430920 4/6/2016 Heater Rental Services (HRS) - Scissorlift Renta 550.00 04/15/2016 226- 45122- 441500 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Lockeroom Suppli 624.30 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421990 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Cleaning Supplies 421.95 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421100 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies 139.58 04/15/2016 226- 45127- 425410 4/6/2016 NBP - Montior Stand, Log Book, Mouse Pad, Sh 101.16 04/15/2016 101 - 41940 - 421990 4/6/2016 Domino's Pizza - Dinner for EDA Meeting 38.13 04/15/2016 213 - 46500- 443990 4/6/2016 Holiday - Batteries 5.99 04/15/2016 217 - 41990 - 421990 4/6/2016 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel - 10.096 gals @ $1.959 19.78 04/15/2016 217 - 41990 - 421200 4/6/2016 Grady's - Airline Ftngs (5) brass insert; (5) delrir 5.00 04/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 422300 4/6/2016 Grady's - Pioneer Pk sign- deck screws 9.49 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421990 4/6/2016 Grady's - Pioneer Pk sign- (2) lined cans; (2) pail 14.56 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Monti Chamber - March Chamber lunch 15.00 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 443990 4/6/2016 Auto Value - #404- (4) green masking tape 21.96 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 421990 4/6/2016 Auto Value -(6) Adhesive JB Kwick 38.94 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Fastenal - (4) brite mark; (5) thrdlcker; etc 51.04 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421990 4/6/2016 Streichers - (3) ylw survivor flashlight 165.00 04/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 421990 4/6/2016 G & K - inv 1043425598 Mat Service 60.13 04/15/2016 609 - 49754- 431990 4/6/2016 G & K - (7) polo shirts - inv 93777717 200.15 04/15/2016 609 - 49754- 421110 4/6/2016 Auto Value - #214, 229- (2) Combo Pintle 289.98 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422110 4/6/2016 Spirit - April 2016 658.32 04/15/2016 656- 49877 - 431990 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/14/2016 - 10:07 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 4/6/2016 Harbor Freight Tools- 11 drwr indust. box; (2) do 822.81 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 424100 4/6/2016 Streichers - LED Flashlights (3) 165.00 04/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 421990 4/6/2016 Recreation Supply - Whistles & Lanyards for Fri 87.12 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 421981 4/6/2016 Recreation Supply - Whistles, Lanyards, Water N 150.92 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 421750 4/6/2016 MN Erosion Control Assoc - MS4 Permit Works 68.00 04/15/2016 101 - 43115- 433100 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 37,400.06 04/15/2016 101 - 43230 - 431000 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 12,414.60 04/15/2016 101 - 43230 - 431010 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 74.63 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 431000 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 34.34 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 431010 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 35.80 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 431000 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 47.74 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 431000 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 36.74 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 431000 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 113.38 04/15/2016 602 - 49480 - 431000 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 208.87 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431000 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 11.93 04/15/2016 101 - 45501- 431990 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 23.87 04/15/2016 609 - 49754- 431000 4/6/2016 Advanced Disposal - February 2016 23.87 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 431000 4/6/2016 Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription 32.99 04/15/2016 101- 41520- 443300 4/6/2016 Vistaprint - Cards for Birthday Parties 128.23 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421990 4/6/2016 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.893 gals @ $1.919 18.98 04/15/2016 217 - 41990 - 421200 4/6/2016 Cub - Limes (20), Lemons (10) 17.70 04/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 4/6/2016 MN Erosion Control Assoc - MS4 Permit Works 17.00 04/15/2016 101 - 43111- 433100 4/6/2016 Delta Airlines - Flight to Washington DC for CG 308.20 04/15/2016 101 - 41110 - 433100 4/6/2016 St.Cloud Parking/River's Edge - MCFOA Parkin 5.00 04/15/2016 101 - 41940 - 433100 4/6/2016 St.Cloud Parking/River's Edge - MCFOA Parkin 5.00 04/15/2016 101 - 41940 - 433100 4/6/2016 Walmart - Staplers (2), Notebook 28.23 04/15/2016 217 - 41990 - 421990 4/6/2016 Walmart - Cleaning Supplies 3.96 04/15/2016 217- 41990 - 421990 4/6/2016 Walmart - Napkins, Paper Plates 9.92 04/15/2016 217 - 41990 - 421990 4/6/2016 Walmart - Bananas 0.89 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 4/6/2016 Walmart - Socks 4.93 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 422990 4/6/2016 Walmart - Cupcakes 20.64 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 421460 4/6/2016 Walmart - Cleaning Supply - Dish Soap 3.74 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421100 4/6/2016 Walmart - Concession Resale - Bananas, Zone B 10.46 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 4/6/2016 Walmart - Pitcher for Meetings (1) 9.97 04/15/2016 101 - 41940 - 443990 4/6/2016 NBP - Paper 49.19 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421990 4/6/2016 NBP - Folders, Pens 36.08 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421990 4/6/2016 Runnings - Steel Toe Boots - 1 pr - BR 79.99 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 421110 4/6/2016 Runnings - Steel Toe Boots - 1 pr - BR 80.00 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 421110 4/6/2016 Monticello Printing - Name Plate (RH) 23.30 04/15/2016 101 - 42400 - 443990 4/6/2016 Auto Value - Organic Vapor 37.18 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 420650 4/6/2016 US Postal Service - Certified First Class Letter ( 3.94 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 432200 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Cleaning Supplies 310.32 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421100 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker room Supp 166.84 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421990 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/14/2016 - 10:07 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies - Napkins 96.34 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 4/6/2016 Life Fitness - Crank Shaft for Spin Bike 81.92 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 421720 4/6/2016 Hobart - Repairs Caterer Kitchen Dishwasher: Pi 246.89 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 440440 4/6/2016 G & K - Uniform Rental - Jeans 21.60 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 441700 4/6/2016 G & K - Mops 46.30 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431110 4/6/2016 G & K - Towels 9.90 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 441710 4/6/2016 Target - CD Player for Pool Area - Water Aerobii 20.49 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 421720 4/6/2016 Monti Napa - Respirator 19.40 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 421990 4/6/2016 Monti Napa - Respirator 19.40 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 421990 4/6/2016 Runnings - Spray Gun - 1# Nozzle 99.99 04/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 422110 4/6/2016 Runnings - Rain Cap (2 1/2 ) for Sewer Jet 9.99 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 422100 4/6/2016 Monti Napa- Air Filter (sewer jet) 25.61 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 422100 4/6/2016 Monti Napa- Freon for A/C (4) 33.56 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 422100 4/6/2016 Monti Napa - disposable SAS 866192 (1/2 Watei 8.70 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 421990 4/6/2016 Monti Napa - disposable SAS 866192 (1/2 Sewe 8.69 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 421990 4/6/2016 Runnings - Fork Ext- (4) shaft set collar 1" 19.96 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 422100 4/6/2016 Monti Napa - (20) asst. bulbs- Shop 20.90 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 422990 4/6/2016 Home Depot - NC Staple 24.44 04/15/2016 101- 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Grady's -(4) 601b. concrete- Sign Posts 25.96 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 422600 4/6/2016 Auto Value -cup brush knotted; 2 1/2 crim 25.98 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422300 4/6/2016 Home Depot - Respirator (1/2) 14.99 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 421990 4/6/2016 Home Depot - Respirator (1/2) 14.98 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 421990 4/6/2016 MacQueen Equip- #108 (9) Nozzle 53.40 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 422100 4/6/2016 Monti Napa - #404 spot panel; gal lacquer 53.58 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 421510 4/6/2016 Auto Value - (3) organic vapor mask 55.77 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 420650 4/6/2016 Runnings - (4) Splash Guard (1/2) 29.91 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 422110 4/6/2016 Runnings - (4) Splash Guard (1/2) 29.90 04/15/2016 602- 49490 - 422110 4/6/2016 Martie's - (2) Preen- Ellison Park 59.98 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421600 4/6/2016 Auto Value - (4) organic vapor mask 74.36 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 420650 4/6/2016 WHCE - 2014 W 7th St -CR39 Feb 2016 contrac 110.50 04/15/2016 101 - 43160 - 431900 4/6/2016 Sherwin Williams - misc.paint and supplies for s 143.25 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421990 4/6/2016 Epic Sports - (6) Chain basketball nets 168.68 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 BigMouth.com- resale (4) super flask; (6) cooler 174.00 04/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 4/6/2016 BigMouth.com- freight 21.75 04/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 4/6/2016 Home Depot - (16) 2x10 -12' Cedar- tables 252.32 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Dyna - Shop- misc screws; washers; cable tic; et 300.40 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 421990 4/6/2016 Zep - (5) 43x60 blk bag 307.90 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Hirshfields - Westbridge- (2)gal Easy Clear; (2) 7 429.04 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422300 4/6/2016 WHCE - Sunset Ponds 2/1- 3/1/2016 948 kWh 125.14 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 438100 4/6/2016 WHCE -1645 & 1675 CR 39 27.34 04/15/2016 602 - 49490- 438100 4/6/2016 WHCE - DMV 19.95 04/15/2016 217- 41990 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -2171 W River St 106.40 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -Fire 27.95 04/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 431900 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/14/2016 - 10:07 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 4/6/2016 WHCE - 5980 Jason Ave NE 19.95 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE - MCC 27.95 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -207 Chelsea Rd - Water 32.95 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -209 Cedar St- Water 29.95 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -132 E Broadway 19.95 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -107 River St W 19.95 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -Hi -Way Liquor April 2016 21.32 04/15/2016 609 - 49754- 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -MCC April 2016 19.95 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE - 200 Dundas Rd- April 2016 29.95 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE - 909 Golf Crse Rd- April 2016 19.95 04/15/2016 101 - 43110- 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE - General Street Lighting 1,313.40 04/15/2016 101 - 43160 - 438100 4/6/2016 G & K - Mat Service 15.60 04/15/2016 217 - 41990 - 421990 4/6/2016 Oriental Trading - Prizes for Egg Scramble & Sp 323.42 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 421980 4/6/2016 Monti Chamber of Commerce - Chamber Lunch 15.00 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 443990 4/6/2016 SuperAmerica - Unleaded Fuel 8.991 gals @ $2. 18.87 04/15/2016 217- 41990 - 421200 4/6/2016 Barnes & Noble - Book for Supervisors (15) 100.68 04/15/2016 101 - 41800 - 421990 4/6/2016 Home Depot - return2x10x12 CT -15.77 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Home Depot - return white pegboard -12.25 04/15/2016 101- 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Home Depot - Pioneer Kitchen pail liners; (4) bn 8.29 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422300 4/6/2016 Grady's -West Bridge -(10) screws 14x2 8.50 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422300 4/6/2016 Runnings - ((4) turn button 11.16 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Grady's -(14) screw lag 15.40 04/15/2016 101 - 43120- 422600 4/6/2016 Grady's -W. Bridge & Pioneer- (2) vac. fltr bags 33.98 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421990 4/6/2016 Home Depot - (2) 330pk GRK R4 Scouts 39.10 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Monti Napa 4402 (10) Straight Tubing 57.70 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 422110 4/6/2016 General Rental - Tank refills Bucket Truck 77.70 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 421520 4/6/2016 St. Michael Napa - Eng#4 (2) Air Cond. Hoses v 97.71 04/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 422110 4/6/2016 Hirshfields - Pioneer Pk Kitch. gal Easy Clr; gal 196.96 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422300 4/6/2016 Runnings - 30' Ext. cord; (2) waste bskt; sprayer, 224.03 04/15/2016 101 - 42200- 421990 4/6/2016 Specialty Turf & Ag - (9) Complete Soil Anlys v 405.00 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 431990 4/6/2016 Marite's Farm Service - Chemicals 99.00 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421600 4/6/2016 Marite's Farm Service - Salt Pellets (63 bags) 365.40 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 422990 4/6/2016 MN Recreation & Park Assoc. - Risk Manageme 30.00 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 433100 4/6/2016 Vistaprint - Sales Tax Refund For Online Order 1 -8.24 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421990 4/6/2016 Walmart - Pizzas, Protein Bars, Bananas, Apples 112.85 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 4/6/2016 Walmart - Stool, Batteries, Tape 45.28 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421990 4/6/2016 Walmart - Duster Refills 13.97 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421100 4/6/2016 Recreation Supply - Skimmer Baskets (2) 23.01 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421610 4/6/2016 SCSU Continuing Ed - 2016 MMCI 5/2 - 5/6/16 110.00 04/15/2016 101 - 41310 - 433100 4/6/2016 Varidesk - Sit/Stand Workstation AS 495.00 04/15/2016 101 - 41910 - 443990 4/6/2016 Monti Chamber - Bfst & Politics 4/7/16 10.00 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 443990 4/6/2016 Sherwin Williams - Pioneer Pk kitchen(2) trim br 13.24 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422300 4/6/2016 Cub - Limes (30), Lemons (8) 20.32 04/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/14/2016 - 10:07 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 4/6/2016 NBP - Detector Pens; 8.5x11 paper 50.00 04/15/2016 609 - 49754- 421990 4/6/2016 Hoglund Bus Truck- Eng #4- Glass Signd202 50.08 04/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 422100 4/6/2016 Hirshfields - Westbridge- inside doors gal Bronz 60.66 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422300 4/6/2016 Monti Napa- (4) natural rub; (2) steel handle; (2) 97.94 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 421990 4/6/2016 Hirshfields - Pioneer Pk floor job supplies 133.15 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422300 4/6/2016 M & M Express- Sm. Engine - (2) chain; carb; 1 172.99 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422100 4/6/2016 Arctic Glacier -resale - inv. 1956606811 243.23 04/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 4/6/2016 Runnings -sales tax refund -13.99 04/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 421990 4/6/2016 Northern Tool - (4) Nozzle 7.80 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Big Lake Lumber - Otter Crk. Gazebo- (4) invoii 1,062.60 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 WHCE -Cedar St Dundas to Chelsea 124.65 04/15/2016 101 - 43160 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -W 7th St & Adj. Pathway 119.75 04/15/2016 101 - 43160 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE - Chelsea Rd East 180.00 04/15/2016 101 - 43160 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -(30) lights- 4018 Sc. Blvd 415.50 04/15/2016 101 - 43160 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -Sc. Blvd Fenning /CSAh 18 to Edmonso 372.00 04/15/2016 101 - 43160 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -(9) lights- 7th St & Highland Way 90.00 04/15/2016 101 - 43160 - 431900 4/6/2016 WHCE -(14) lights- 4489 Sc. Blvd 193.90 04/15/2016 101 - 43160 - 431900 4/6/2016 General Credit Forms - CC Machine Tape (100 r 95.40 04/15/2016 217 - 41990 - 421990 4/6/2016 GFOA - 2016 Budget Application 330.00 04/15/2016 101 - 41520- 443990 4/6/2016 Allianz - Travel Ins- CG 5/17 - 5/18/16 Trip to 21.00 04/15/2016 101 - 41110 - 433100 4/6/2016 Recreation Supply - Pool Rope (1), Rope Clamp, 309.22 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421610 4/6/2016 Fastenal - Cable Ties & Hardware for Bench Sea 8.00 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 422990 4/6/2016 Super America - Unleaded Fuel 8.570 gals @ $1 16.79 04/15/2016 217 - 41990 - 421200 4/6/2016 Constant Contact - Monthly Email Marketing Se 55.00 04/15/2016 226- 45122- 430910 4/6/2016 Jimmy Johns - Lunch for Arvig Negotiation Tear 80.95 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 443990 4/6/2016 Trusted Employees - Background Checks (1) 115.00 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431990 4/6/2016 Trusted Employees - Background Checks (1) 23.00 04/15/2016 101 - 41310- 431990 4/6/2016 MCC - Pop for Arvig Negotiation Team Meeting 7.50 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 443990 4/6/2016 G & K - Uniforms - Jeans 21.60 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 441700 4/6/2016 G & K - Mops 43.30 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431110 4/6/2016 G & K - Towels 9.90 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 441710 4/6/2016 APEC - Filters (25) 478.51 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 422990 4/6/2016 MN Dept Labor - Confirm #24494171109 Qtr 1 3,567.80 04/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 208110 4/6/2016 MN Dept Labor - Confirm #24494171109 Qtr 1 - 142.71 04/15/2016 101 - 42400 - 343000 4/6/2016 123 Signup - Northstar Chapter Meeting 4/14/16 45.00 04/15/2016 101 - 41520- 433100 4/6/2016 Domino's Pizza - Dinner for PC /CC Workshop 4. 53.59 04/15/2016 101 - 41910- 443990 4/6/2016 Walmart - Cupcakes 27.52 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 421460 4/6/2016 Walmart - Cleaning Supplies 7.62 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421100 4/6/2016 Walmart - Apples for Concession 4.24 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 4/6/2016 Walmart - Batteries 13.97 04/15/2016 226- 45122- 421990 4/6/2016 Walmart - Cleaning Supplies 60.77 04/15/2016 217- 41990 - 421990 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Cleaning Supplies 613.37 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421100 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker room Supp 248.32 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421990 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/14/2016 - 10:07 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Cleaner - Delimer Chemical 47.12 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421600 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies - Plates 37.69 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies - Plates, Fc 262.74 04/15/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Cleaning Supplies 767.11 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421100 4/6/2016 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 837.41 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421990 4/6/2016 Monti Napa 4144 return -5.46 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 422100 4/6/2016 Grady's -24 pk grommet refill 4.49 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 US Postal Service -return cable for sewer camera 6.45 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 432200 4/6/2016 Grady's -(3) paint brush 6.87 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 421990 4/6/2016 Grady's - P/S Fluid 6.94 04/15/2016 656- 49877 - 440500 4/6/2016 Grady's - (2) test plug slip 6.98 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Randy's Sanitation - April 2016 service Shreddii 16.06 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 431990 4/6/2016 General Rental -20 lbs propane for heater in Sew 17.78 04/15/2016 602- 49490 - 421990 4/6/2016 Home Depot - kneepads 19.97 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 420650 4/6/2016 Cub - (40) Limes 20.00 04/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 4/6/2016 Kwik Trip - #3 - (12.451) gal unleaded @ $1.955 24.39 04/15/2016 656- 49877 - 421200 4/6/2016 City of Monti - Row permit FNM 25.00 04/15/2016 656- 49877 - 421990 4/6/2016 Home Depot - ((5) 5 gal water w/ exchange 34.30 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 421990 4/6/2016 Runnings - (8) 24 pk water; (2) gal truck wash c 40.30 04/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 421990 4/6/2016 Kwik Trip - #2 - (28.911) gal unleaded @ $1.955 56.64 04/15/2016 656- 49877 - 421200 4/6/2016 DISH - April 2016 service 56.64 04/15/2016 609 - 49754- 432500 4/6/2016 Monti Napa - (2) face sheilds; air filter 61.96 04/15/2016 101 - 43120- 420650 4/6/2016 Monti Napa - #144- (2) fuel fltrs; Air Flit; Oil flt 63.72 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 422100 4/6/2016 Toolin' Around - (10) Ratcheting tie -down 70.00 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Nokomis Shoes - T.G. boots 90.00 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 420650 4/6/2016 Monticello Vacuum - Filter Set (1) 17.95 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 422990 4/6/2016 Monticello Vacuum - Vacuum Bags (2) 39.90 04/15/2016 226- 45122- 421100 4/6/2016 Life Fitness - Upright Belt & Pulley (1) for Spin 61.88 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 422105 4/6/2016 Grady's - (3) plug clean out 3.47 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421990 4/6/2016 Walmart - MAXX -34N; core battery 124.19 04/15/2016 656- 49877 - 421990 4/6/2016 NBP - suckers; (2) bx spenda; gloves; bx blade c 147.91 04/15/2016 609 - 49754- 421990 4/6/2016 Home Depot - 30x80 prehung 6 panel; shims 147.98 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Arctic Glacier - resale - inv. 1957607810; 19576 193.18 04/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 4/6/2016 Zarnoth Brush- V -belt blower 3 bands cogged 281.86 04/15/2016 101 - 43127- 422100 4/6/2016 G & K - (1)X polo shirts - inv93781509 26.24 04/15/2016 609 - 49754 - 421110 4/6/2016 G & K - (5) inv. Mat Service 302.15 04/15/2016 609 - 49754- 431990 4/6/2016 Big Lake Lumber -inv. #20051407 (16) brown tr 334.40 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Hotsy- Pressure Washer Repair 339.95 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 440100 4/6/2016 TurfWerks.com - Governor AY KO1B; Pwr Puml 944.72 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 422100 4/6/2016 Aramark - 2/11 - 3/24/16 Invoices - Parks 213.63 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 441700 4/6/2016 Aramark - 2/11- 3/24/16 Invoices - Sewer 109.48 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 441700 4/6/2016 Aramark - 2/11- 3/24/16 Invoices - Water 109.48 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 441700 4/6/2016 Aramark - 2/11 - 3/24/16 Invoices - Streets 289.65 04/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 441700 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/14/2016 - 10:07 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 4/6/2016 Aramark - 2/11- 3 /24/16 Invoices - Shop Towels 222.49 04/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 421990 4/6/2016 MINNCOR- Ellison Pk- Boarding Dock Kit; (4) 8,246.00 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421650 4/6/2016 Kwik Trip - #3 - (12.287) gal unleaded @ $1.955 24.07 04/15/2016 656- 49877 - 421200 4/6/2016 MN Parks & Sports Turf - 2016 membership ren 50.00 04/15/2016 101 - 45201- 443300 4/6/2016 Home Depot - (12) silicone clear; (3) elec. tape 57.36 04/15/2016 656- 49877 - 421990 4/6/2016 Starbucks - Fraudulant Purchase - Credit Receive 75.00 04/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 115030 4/6/2016 McMater -Carr- sewer camera- Micro Connector: 86.96 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 422100 Check Total: 91,237.23 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 5 4/1/2016 Vanco - Fitness Rewards - March 2016 45.00 04/15/2016 226 - 45122- 430700 4/1/2016 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - March 2016 40.10 04/15/2016 656- 49870 - 443980 4/1/2016 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - March 2016 10.05 04/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 443980 4/1/2016 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - March 2016 10.05 04/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 443980 Check Total: 105.20 Total for Check Run: 98,931.78 Total of Number of Checks: 5 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 4/25/16 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (04/14/2016 - 10:07 AM) City Council Agenda: 4/25/16 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring /departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire /departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires /departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new /terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Hannah Lavold Guest Service 2 MCC 4/8/2016 PT Emma Lefebvre Life Guard MCC 4/11/2016 PT Billy Vickers Streets Worker Streets 5/2/2016 Seasonal Scott Imdieke Streets Worker Streets 5/2/2016 Seasonal Charles DeGrio Parks Worker Parks 5/2/2016 Seasonal Tim Genung Parks Worker Parks 5/2/2016 Seasonal Chad Hadley Parks Worker Parks 5/2/2016 Seasonal Randy Blair Parks Worker Parks 5/2/2016 Seasonal Caitlin Lashbrook Fitness Instructor MCC 5/3/2016 PT Kramer Voll Parks Worker Parks 5/9/2016 Seasonal Alex Hoglund Parks Worker Parks 5/23/2016 Seasonal Andrew LaVallee Parks Worker Parks 5/23/16 Seasonal Jennifer Swanson Guest Service 2 MCC 5/22/2016 PT Trevor Bautch Parks Worker Parks 6/5/16 Seasonal TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day Class Scott Imdieke Voluntary Streets 4/1/16 Temporary Austin Johnson Voluntary Parks 4/1/16 Temporary New Hire and Terms City Council 2016: 4/21/2016 City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus city property (WO) There is no report this City Council cycle. City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 2D. Consideration of Adopting Resolution 2016 -027 Authorizing Conveyance of City Property to the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority by Quit Claim Deed For Outlot A, Otter Creek Crossings 11t Addition And Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossings Yd Addition (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of a quit claim deed for the transfer of two parcels of property at Otter Creek business park from the City of Monticello to the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority. The Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority, now EDA, purchased the properties at Otter Creek business park for economic development purposes. The City holds the parcels in ownership until such time as the EDA has the potential to convey /sell the property for economic development purposes. At this time, an existing property owner at Otter Creek (Dahlheimer Beverage /Clear Creek, LLC) is interested in purchase of the two parcels for the expansion of their existing business. It is anticipated that the EDA will consider an offer for purchase of the parcels and a corresponding purchase and development agreement at the May 11th, 2016 EDA regular meeting. The quit claim deed conveyance by the City to the EDA is contingent on the sale of the property by the EDA to the potential buyer, Clear Creek, LLC. Timing of the conveyance will occur in concert with that sale. Al. Budget Impact: The conveyance of the land to the EDA has no budget impact to the City. The EDA funded the original acquisition of the property and therefore the transfer of the property to the EDA does not include a monetary cost for the land transaction. At present, the parcels are tax exempt. There will be minor costs to the EDA in recording the deed at the time of closing, estimated at less than $200. A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff, including the consulting City Engineer, City Planner and the EDA's attorney have been working on this project consistent with the City's economic development goals for Otter Creek. Costs for this project will be billed to planning and zoning budget and to the EDA as applicable. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 -027 Authorizing Conveyance of City Property to the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority by Quit Claim Deed for Outlot A, Otter Creek Crossings 1St Addition and Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossings Yd Addition. City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 2. Motion to deny adopting Resolution 2016 -027 Authorizing Conveyance of City Property to the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority by Quit Claim Deed for Outlot A, Otter Creek Crossings 1St Addition and Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossings 3rd Addition. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 above. Conveyance of the property by the City to the EDA will facilitate the furthering of the City's economic development goals for business retention and expansion, as well as increase in tax base. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2016 -027 • Quit Claim Deed • Plat of Otter Creek 1 It Addition • Plat of Otter Creek 31 Addition • Aerial Image 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO. 2016-027 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF CITY PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ( "Council ") of the City of Monticello (the "City ") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Monticello Economic Development Authority ( "Authority") administers the Central Monticello Development Project (the "Project "), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1082, as amended, to promote economic and job opportunities and to promote the Development of land which is underutilized within the City. 1.02. Pursuant to the Act, the Authority is authorized to acquire real property, or interests therein, and to undertake certain activities to facilitate the development of real property by private enterprise. 1.03. The Authority is considering an offer to enter into a Purchase and Development Agreement (the "Contract ") between the Authority and Clear Creek Land Company, LLC (the "Developer "), under which among other things the Authority will convey certain property located within the Project and described as Outlot A, Otter Creek Crossings 1" Addition and Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossings 3rd Addition (the "Development Property") to Developer to facilitate the development of the Development Property. 1.04. The City currently owns the Development Property. 1.05. The City is authorized to convey real property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.035 to any governmental subdivision for a nominal consideration, or pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.64 to any other political subdivision of the State. 1.06. The Authority is a political subdivision of the State pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.091, Subdivision 2. 1.07. The City finds and determines that conveyance of the Development Property to the Authority is for a public purpose and is in the public interest because it will further the objectives of the Project. 478257v1 MINI MN325 -30 1.08. The City finds and determines that conveyance by the Authority of the Development Property to the Developer is for a public purpose and is in the public interest because it will further the objectives of the Project. Section 2. Authorization. 2.01. The Council approves the conveyance of the Development Property to the Authority by quit claim deed for reconveyance to the Developer, subject to approval by the Authority of the Contract and satisfaction of the conditions for closing provided therein, and authorizes and directs city staff and officials to execute the deed and related documents necessary to facilitate the transaction referenced herein and contemplated herein, with all such actions to be in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Resolution and in the Contract. 2.02. City staff and officials are authorized and directed to take any and all additional steps and actions necessary or convenient in order to accomplish the intent of this Resolution. Approved by the City Council of the City of Monticello this 25th day of April, 2016. Mayor ATTEST: Clerk 478257v1 MINI MN325 -30 Quit Claim Deed Deed Tax Due: $1.65 ECRV: NA Date: FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City of Monticello, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to City of Monticello Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota, Grantee, real property in Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Outlot A, Otter Creek Crossings 1" Addition; according to the recorded plat thereof, and Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossings 3rd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof. Check here if part or all of the land is Registered (Torrens) O together with all hereditaments and appurtenances, subject to easements of record. ❑ The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. ❑ A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document or has been electronically filed. (If electronically filed, insert WDC number: ). ❑ 1 am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. 478175v1 CBRNIN325 -30 City of Monticello By Brian Stumpf Its Mayor By Jeff O'Neill Its City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA M.p COUNTY OF WRIGHT The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Brian Stumpf and Jeff O'Neill, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of City of Monticello, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the municipal corporation, Grantor. NOTARY STAMP This instrument was drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337 -9300 478175v1 CBRMN325 -30 SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT Tax Statements should be sent to: City of Monticello Economic Development Authority 505 Walnut Avenue, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 -8822 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the City of Monticello, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota to wit: Lot 1, Block 2, Otter Creek Crossing, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as OTTER CREEK CROSSING 1 ST ADDITION and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the thoroughfare and the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof, said City of Monticello, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this -7th day ofd -2005. BY: rr,�11 BY: �'� � Clint Herbst, Mayor Rick Wolfstelle , City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA - COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 }�` day of Se.nVe -�bev 2005 by Clint Herbst, Mayor, and Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator, of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County, - • 4.% DAWN M. • NOTARY 1 ":'" D W on F ; /e. Or: L' ;ty F A49rltice //o OFFI'C I RL PLAT OTTER Cj PffffA CXOSS-NG - ISTfll)W ITION I hereby certify that I have surveyed and* platted the property described on this plat as OTTER CREEK CROSSING 1ST ADDITION, that this plat is a correct representation of said survey, that all distances are correctly shown in feet and hundredths of a foot, that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown or will be placed as required by the local governmental unit, that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on said plat and that there are no wet lands as defined by MS 505.02, Subd. 1 or public highways to be designated other than as shown. Steven V. Ische, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 22703 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF A n0ka The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this 2I•th day of LA!2 u S� , 2005 by Steven V. Ische, Land Surveyor, Minnesota Lice se No. 22703. M', Notary Public, 14nokct County, Minnesota My Commission Expires: %-,6nua r u X31, ?_U! O DIANNE NOVAK Notary Public - Minnesota My Comm lon Ezpns Jan 31, 2010 PLANNING COMMISSION This plat of OTTER CREEK CROSSING 1 ST ADDITION was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota at a regular meeting ��helld this i.Sy day of AVo ►r®.nl.�rX , 200 4 By:(.,,t� -� Chairman CITY COUNCIL This plat of OTTER CREEK CROSSING 1 ST ADDITION was approved and accepted in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd,2, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this day of &My -gl 2005. BY-.— BY-.(:: Clint Herbst, Mayor Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator COUNTY SURVEYOR L b. Examined and recommended for approval this 1-3 day of jS1,z , 2005. County Surveyor, Wright Cbunty, Min COUNTY AUDITOR Taxes paid for all years through year aoov and transfer entered thisl$TNday of Scef'c mber , 2005. By: 52,,E Q Wii.,..•D ,G., y►x P�dm�.�.i.i� County Auditor, Wright County, Minnesota COUNTY TREASURER I hereby certify that taxes payable in the year coos on lands herein described are paid this3kf�day of�t�, 2005. By: K od.P&:Q 7S/.,ay&A&, County Treasurer, Wright County, COUNTY HIGHWAY ENGINEER i This at was recommended for approval this day of Wright COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record this a ?"day ofSople►"be 2005, at ,2: oo o'clock P .M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet 6 , Sleeve /7602 ,as Document Number `179199 By: County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota 056.cl o Avoice- - - W J6 ,pp1 .0 A r ;P0 2, �•8 � o No��NPO�c O`��R G _ RP �N GR�E� _-r_• p�Ar OFFICIRL PLRT � \ OTT.�R C���1YCRO ,�S',�S'INGI,�S�'T�l>l>ITIDN c 200.53 S70'41'15 "E - R =1424 �4 \ L= 295.02 �� L_ 4 29.4 99 A 11'49'15" 744;27 _ 7',59, ..r I r,T 1- BLOCK 2 .,22 tip• _ 1 `A - So \ 00 ; \ \ F \ 0 2 \ S\� 12A \ \ ` -SO /y4 45127 ��N�� SSG oFzN�Ry /\ \\ \ \ \\ o r �� c� �k9 Ygc 1vt o / I r / / / NN y2 \ \ SS /NO LOT 1 OF BLOOk ^SON O N N 0) O' \ �Q�Vl fro O P') 80 v \\GORN�R21 �OOp�I j �� CO c. ZGPS / 1j o t R CRJ IERL Y CV MI U O .al m ZI I 3 % coA p• - / Y GRAPHIC SCALE Cu 100 0 50 100 �v O: U ti Q; Oti Oti - �O I I I — N 6 Imo— N 6 J -- - \ `CROSSING LOT 1, BLOCK 2 - - 200 s is f00 \ Ter s- e�rc \ °0 N° °serest \ 46g7g4) ` \ - - DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: BEING 6 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND 12' IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING PLAT AND RIGHT OF WAY. LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 10, T.121, R. 25 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N88'50'00 ^W DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 DENOTES 1/2 ^x 14' IRON MONUMENT TO BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF RECORDING OF THE PLAT. DENOTES FOUND WRIGHT COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT ilk WSB As�cicrtm. Inc. .ffffFFZ OF2AfffFEFAf r - 0.17 -c - - -- ^ n ,_ ;7 EEk CRDINE OF J \\ N ' : * ��' \ ss /NC LOT 1 M BLOCk �/ o N N /^I \ 2 L�41 10 \\` 471.92 4 52'1950p�.__ �2g�1i \ 27" ,,— R 5 i \ \ N5579'02 \ \ �INE'OF"w •— 107 09 \ \ == >16.06 BOO ER CREEK LY — \ - \ `CROSSING LOT 1, BLOCK 2 - - 200 s is f00 \ Ter s- e�rc \ °0 N° °serest \ 46g7g4) ` \ - - DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: BEING 6 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND 12' IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING PLAT AND RIGHT OF WAY. LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 10, T.121, R. 25 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N88'50'00 ^W DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 DENOTES 1/2 ^x 14' IRON MONUMENT TO BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF RECORDING OF THE PLAT. DENOTES FOUND WRIGHT COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT ilk WSB As�cicrtm. Inc. .ffffFFZ OF2AfffFEFAf r - OFFICIAL PLAT O T T E R CR S E X CR O. SS I N G.; R D A D D I TI O N KNOWALL MENBY 7HESEPRESENTS: That the City of Monticello, a Minnesota Munidpa/ Corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County ofWiight, State of Minnesota to wit.• All of OU77 0TB, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to said plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota. And also: That pad of OU77-OT E, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to said plat on file and offeaoni in the office of the County Recorder Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the most easterly comer ofLot 1, Block 1, OTTER CREEK CROSSING 1STADD /T /ON, according to said plat on file and ofrecvrd in the office of the County Recorder Wright County, Minnesota; thence South 41 degrees 02 minutes 17 seconds West, assumed bearing along the southeasterly line ofsaid Lot 1, 434.31 feet thence South 40 degrees 53 minutes 16 seconds East, 507.03 feet; thence North 41 degrees 02 minutes 17 seconds East, 434.31 feet to the nodheasterlyline ofsaid OUTL0TE,• thence North 40 degrees 53 minutes 16 seconds West, along said northeasterly line, 507.03 feet to the point of beginning. And also: That pad of OWL 0TE, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to said plat on file and ofrecord in the ol/rce of the County Recorder Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows Beginning at the most southerly comer ofOudotA, OTTER CREEKCROSS/NG 1STADD /T /ON, according to said p /at on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder Weight County, Minnesota, thence South 41 degrees 02 minutes 17 seconds West, assumed bearing along the southwesterly extension of the southeasterly line of said OudotA, 512.89 feet to d)e west line ofsaid OU77 0TE,• thence North 00 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds West, along said west fine, 686.83 feet to the southwestedy/ine of said OU77 0TA, thence South 49 degrees 07m1nutes 40 seconds East, along said southwesterly line, 458.31 feet to the point of beginning. And also: That pad ofOU77-OT C, OTTER CREEKCROSS/NG 2NDADD/T/ON, according to said p /at on file and ofrecord in the office of the County Recorder Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows Beginning at the most westerly comer ofsaid OUM0T C; thence North 38 degrees 32 minutes 17 seconds East assumed bearing along the northwesterly line ofsaid OU77- 0 T C, 24.47feet, thence South 42 degrees 30 minutes 10 seconds East 136.91 feet to the southwestedyline ofsaid OUTZOT C; thence North 52 degrees 47m/nutes 51 seconds West along said southwesterly line, 13528 feet to the point of beginning. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as OTTER CREEKCROSS/NG 3RDADD /T/ONand does hereby donate and dedicate to the pub //c forpub/ic use forever the thoroughfares, cu /de sacs and the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and uti/itypurposes only. In witness whereof, said City ofMontice / /o, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this I to % day of ck kY, 200 6 . BY, BY.• � Clint Herbst, Mayor Rick Wo/fsteller, Qk Administrator STATEOFM/NNESOTA COUNTY OF W r %91r a the foregoing instvment was acknow /edged before me this St� aayoL0&LrdTZ,201Z(s by Clint Herbst, Mayor, and Rick Wo/fste / %r 0ty Administrator of the City ofMondce//o, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation on beha/fofthe corporation. L )mxkr � 'M • —4ZN. W S3 w%W. NotaryPub/ic, lu �t � County, Minnesota DAWN R GROSSINGER M Commission Ex ires. JQ& 3 10 O NOTARY PUBLIC- MINNESOTA Y P 1 My Commission Exgres Jan 31. 2010 /hereby certifyMat /have surveyed andp/atted the property described on this plat as OTTER CREEK CROSSING 3RDADD /T /ON, that this plat is a correct representation ofsaid survey, that all distances are correctly shown in feet and hundredths of foot, that a/ /monuments have been coffecdy placed in the ground as shown or wi / /be placed as required by the ftelgovemmenta/ unit, that the outside boundary lines are conecdydes/gnated on said platand that there are no wet /ands as defined by MS 505 02, Subd. 1 orpub/ic highways to be designated other than as shown . s r. "Va . Steven V. lsche, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No 22703 STATEOFM/NNESOTA COUNTYOF S The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this 10 day of Oc f0lXr , 200(o by Steven V. /sche, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No 22703 Notary Pub /ic, Shuiur'V. County, Minnesota My Commission FD/res: Otlat(tD DEANNA MARIE LESEMAN ,. NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA a ycewwrnEgnubn 31,2010 PLANNING COMM /SS /ON This p /at of OTTER CREEKCROSS/NG 3RDADD /T /ON City of Monticello, Minnesota at regular meeting he /d this I S} day of N oytmber, 200U4. By Chairman C/TYCOUNCIL was appro ved by the Planning Commission of the This p /at of OTTER CREEKCROSS/NG 3RDADD /T /ON was app�ved and accepted by the City Council of Me City ofMontice//o, Minnesota at a r�sgu /armeeting held this t y* day of 11 L*q US 200 . BY BY Clint Herbst, Arayor RickWo/fste / %r QyAd inishator COUNTYSURVEYOR Examined and recommended forappmva/ this I E *day of ©Gm BEie , 200f.- By. Q .� County Surveyor Wright County, Minnesota COUNTYAUD/TOR Taxes paid fora / /years through year 0 S and bansferentered this L!�dayofkaug-^5eq , 200 &. By. -- gazdgy4— W'i4;� 1144 l T ccw%Ll�cq CountyAuditor, right County, Minne ta 17 r OO COUNTY7REASURER /hereby certify that taxes payable in the year ar74 L on /ands herein desdfbed are paid this i,r day of ,,,,Zm[iE•a200(.. By.• &dd LT4- County Treasurtir, Weight County, Mi nesot? COUNTYRECORDER l hereby certify drat this /nstvment was filed in the otirce of the County RecorderformwrI th/s !Ltday of�DVGmDex,200L, at . c t) o'clock P.M., and was du/yrecorded in Cabinet to , Sleeve 1481 ,as Document Number )031418' . By. ' County Recorder, PfthtCoun6VMnnesot9 AB S1 �ffFIOF2Sff�ffTS C:Ai b� 1`t OMA-►ccklo 4 66.00 d-_19 $105-1 Centerline of 200 foot Electric Tronsmissimn -- Easement (per Doc No 469184) '� I S89'53'44 "E `',1229 89 1494.44 -- - -- -- +J - -- ofFIC IAA PLAT V Abw CXE�1YCRO,KS,SIVCY",40- PVTIDN \ \ - -- -NORTH LINE OF NE 114 OF THE SW 114 SEC 10 T 721 R 25 OUTLOT 1 VICINITY MAP Not To Scale Section 10, Township 121, Range 25. / I -------------------- Drainage - ---------- X09 - -i Easement 4 3 1 / 9 1 �, 1 \ \I '/ °o \ 00(0 \ o \ 1 C, P 1 \\ M - -WEST LINE OF OUTLOT E, jt '� OR1F7! CIlDC O OTTER CREEK \CROSSING ADDN. Z \ 'o� \ 1 r -- -NORTH LINE OF SE !14 OF THE SW �14 SEC 10 L 721 R 25 \ \ ` 1331.02 ', I - -SE COR OUTLOT B OTTER \ I r - - - - -- / II CREEK CROSSING \ \ I \ i \ Ile / /'\ G \ C 'fir/ _%\ s����F \ \ / G Pp� OJ O� \ \ / �h� I w s z S8S �� F\ (��,• ivy �i . � � \\ OUTLOT C I oo / \ 4o IS,/, \ I ° O y� 6 1j 1 \\ \ Ozw I OUTLOT D o 0 °. S��c - -- / SOcS� w , -MOST SLY COR I 4K tK \ \ 41 IN .� OUTLOT A, OTTER I., a op \ \ CREEK CROSSING °s h� 6� •O�' 1ST ADDITION C) S °T 9T \ \ o\ <')- \\ o, \� k0• I 1 F \ 0° I -------------------- Drainage - ---------- , - -i Easement �F�,oT / 1 / 1 \ \I '/ °o \ 00(0 \ o \ 1 C, P 1 \\ M - -WEST LINE OF OUTLOT E, jt O OTTER CREEK \CROSSING ADDN. Z \ 'o� \ 1 r -- -NORTH LINE OF SE !14 OF THE SW �14 SEC 10 L 721 R 25 \ \ ` 1331.02 ', I - -SE COR OUTLOT B OTTER \ I r - - - - -- II CREEK CROSSING \ \ I \ i i GRAPHIC SCALE 120 0 60 120 6 Ilf Nl II 1N NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: BEING 6 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND 12' IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING PLAT AND RIGHT OF WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE WEST LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 SEC. 10 T. 121 R. 25 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR S01'17'56 "E 0 DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 DENOTES 1 /2*x 14' IRON MONUMENT TO BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF RECORDING OF THE PLAT. DENOTES FOUND WRIGHT COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT W18 S f I L� L F Z O F Z Sf I f L f' T S Subject Area April 21, 2o16 City Boundary CITY of Monticello 1 inch = 376 feet Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES /Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmappng, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, sWsstopo, and the GIS User Community Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 2E. Consideration to approve applications for temporary on -sale liquor licenses for the Monticello Lions Club for Riverfest Community Celebration events on July 16 and 17, 2016 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Monticello Lions Club is requesting approval of three 1 -day temporary on -sale liquor license applications for the following Riverfest Community Celebration events to be held on July 16 and 17, 2016. • Art in the Park Beer Garden: Concession/beer stand on Saturday, July 16 at Ellison Park located at 811 River Street East • Riverfest Street Dance: Concession/beer stand on Saturday, July 16 in the Monticello Community Center parking lot located at 505 Walnut Street • Chicken Dinner /Duck Drop Beer Garden: Concession/beer stand on Sunday, July 17 at Ellison Park located at 811 River Street East The Lions Club will provide a certificate of insurance for these events. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time to send applications to State Alcohol and Gambling Division for approval and signatures. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to approve three temporary on -sale liquor license applications submitted by the Monticello Lions for events related to the Riverfest Community Celebration: Art in the Park Beer Garden at Ellison Park on July 16, 2016, Riverfest Street Dance at the Monticello Community Center parking lot on July 16, 2016, and Chicken Dinner /Duck Drop at Ellison Park on July 17, 2016, contingent on providing the necessary liquor liability insurance certificate. 2. Do not approve the two temporary on -sale liquor license applications. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 for approval of the applications. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Applications for temporary on -sale liquor licenses — Monticello Lions Club Minnesota Department of Public Safety el:(D Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651 - 201 -7500 Fax 651 - 297 -5259 TTY 651 - 282 -6555 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number Monticello Lions Oct 1975 q -602 Address City State Zip Code PO Box 673 Monticello -1 Minnesota I 55362 Name of person making application Business phone Home phone Craig Walter 763- 238 -6938 I _ Date(s) of event Type of organization IJuly 16th, 2016 1 0 Club ❑ Charitable ❑ Religious Other non - profit Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Chad Vokaty Big Lake Minnesota 55309 Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Paul Brandjord Monticello Minnesota 55362 Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Dave OConnell Monticello Minnesota- 55362 Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Minnesota Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. Art in The Park Beer Garden Ellison Park 811 E River Rd, Monticello, Mn, 55362 p If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Christianson Group $1000000 APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Fee Amount Date Fee Paid Date Approved Permit Date City or County E -mail Address City or County Phone Number Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E -MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY /COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E -MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY /COUNTY TO AGE. TEMPORARYAPPLICATION @STATE.MN.US Minnesota Department of Public Safety ctno Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651- 201 -7500 Fax 651 - 297 -5259 M 651 - 282 -6555 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number Monticello Lions Oct 1975 q -602 Address City State Zip Code 1PO Box 673 Monticello Minnesota — 155362�� Name of person making application Business phone Home phone Craig Walter 763 - 238 -6938 �- Date(s) of event Type of organization IJuly 17th, 2016 ® Club F] Charitable 0 Religious Other non - profit Organization officer's name City State Zip Code_ IChad Vokaty Big Lake Minnesota 55309 Organization officer's name City State Zip Code IPaul Brandjord Monticello Minnesota I 55362 Organization officer's name City � State Zip Code Dave OConnell IMonticello Minnesota 155362 Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Minnesota Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. Sunday Dinner /Duck Drop Beer Garden Ellison Park 811 E River Rd, Monticello, Mn, 55362 p If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Christianson Group $1000000 APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Fee Amoun Date Fee Paid Date Approved Permit Date City or County E -mail Address City or County Phone Number Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E -MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY /COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E -MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY /COUNTY TO AGE. TEMPORARYAPPLICATION @STATE.MN.US Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division j CIMM 0 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651- 201 -7500 Fax 651- 297 -5259 TTY 651 - 282 -6555 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number Monticello Lions Oct 1975 !� q -602 I Address City State Zip Code PO Box 673 Monticello Minnesota _ 55362 Name of person making application Business phone Home phone Craig Walter 11763-238-6938 Date(s) of event Type of organization 1july 16th, 2016 � Club F� Charitable F] Religious Other non - profit Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Chad Vokaty Big Lake - -1 Minnesota T 155309 Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Paul Brandjord Monticello Minnesota 55362 Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Dave OConnell IMonticello Minnesota 55362 Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Minnesota Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. Riverfest Street Dance 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, Mn 55362 If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Christianson Group $1000000 APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Fee Amount Date Fee Paid Date Approved Permit Date City or County E -mail Address City or County Phone Number Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E -MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY /COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E -MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY /COUNTY TO AGE. TEMPORARYAPPLICATION @STATE.MN.US City Council Agenda: 4/25/16 2F. Consideration to changes and ordinance amendments to certain City Boards and Commission. (JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the January 25, 2016 City Council Special Meeting, City staff presented a matrix of City organizations (Boards /Commission) and discussed the possibility of adjustments to these organizations to allow the City to operate more efficiently and be more effective. Over the last few months changes have been made to various boards and commissions. The following is a summary of the changes: Police Advisory Commission. Direction was given to shift quarterly Sheriff's Department reports from the Police Commission and to the City Council. Public safety topics, issues or projects that arise from time to time to be addressed with citizen input. Current members of the Police Advisory commission to assist on such special projects. Formal presence of Police Commission to cease. In reviewing the matter with the Police Commission, it was a consensus of the members that they would like to stay involved as volunteers but agreed that a shift in the manner of involvement is appropriate and could improve effectivenss as volunteers. Going forward, the volunteers plan on attending the City Council meeting when quarterly reports are provided. It is at this time that they would have the opportunity to provide input to the City Council and discuss participating as interested citizens with follow -upon on topics that arise from the meeting,. 2. Industrial & Economic Development Committee. Council had requested that staff review with the IEDC the potential for shifting from participation in a standing committee to participation as citizens on economic development initiatives. The IEDC felt that the existing basic framework is preferred, however the City Council participation could shift from two members to one. 3. Safety Committee. This committee is an employee committee and, therefore, the City Council membership position has been removed. This does not preclude a member of Council from attending. Other changes /discussion that has occurred subsequent City Council input at the workshop. • Regular quarterly workshop for City Council established, • Transportation Advisory Committee formally ended. However, former committee members will be asked on an individual basis for input on transportation projects as the need arises. • Cautious approach being taken to potential merger of MCC and Parks Commission. Although subject areas have some commonalities, both groups believe that the variation in subject matter between the two commissions is significant. It's hard to be develop City Council Agenda: 4/25/16 sufficient knowledge to be effective in both subject areas. So it is probably best to preserve the status quo. • Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Fields Planning Committee - shifted to Parks Commission. • Highway 25 Coalition likely to be established with all 5 agencies approving the concept. Approval of final agreement by all set to occur within next few weeks. • Well Head Protection, Fire Truck Committee, Wastewater treatment plant facility ended. • FiberNet Monticello Advisory Board to remain with future pending culmination of assigning Contract Manager to operate FNM. Overall, there with the changes made, there will be a reduction of approximately 8 % involving City Council and Boards and Commissions established by ordinance. The number of meetings involving ad -hoc committees will be reduced by about 50 %. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the following: A. Approve Ordinance No. amending the Monticello City Code by eliminating Title II, Chapter 7 — Police Advisory Commission. B. Approve Ordinance No. amending Section 2 -10 -3, Industrial and Economic Development Committee: Membership. C. Approve the removal of representation from a City Council member on the City Safety Committee. 2. Motion to deny changes and ordinance amendment to certain City Boards and Commissions. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Draft Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE BY ELIMINATING TITLE II, CHAPTER 10, SECTION 3 — INDUSTRIAL & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE: MEMBERSHIP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0 HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Title II, Chapter 10 — Industrial and Economic Development Committee, shall be amended as follows: 2 -10 -3: MEMBERSHIP: The Monticello IEDC shall consist of sixteen (16) to eighteen (18) regular members to be appointed by the City Council of Monticello. Said Committee members shall consist of Monticello business representatives or residents of the City of Monticello. One T- e Council members shall be appointed annually to serve on the IEDC. The Director of the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Industry shall be an ex- officio member of the IEDC. Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 25th day of April, 2016. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: ABSENT: ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE BY ELIMINATING TITLE II, CHAPTER 7 — POLICE ADVISORY COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0 HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Title II, Chapter 7 - Police Advisory Commission, shall be deleted in its entirety from the Monticello City Code and reference to this title shall be removed from city code indexes. Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 25th day of April, 2016. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: AB SENT: City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 2G. Consideration to adopt Ordinance No. 638 amending the Therapeutic Massage Enterprises and Massage Therapists Ordinance by amending Section 3 -18 -2: Definitions (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Staff is requesting the City Council to adopt Ordinance 638 amending Title 3, Chapter 18 Therapeutic Massage Enterprises and Massage Therapists, Section 2 — Definitions - by amending the definition of `Accredited Institution'. After further research it was determined that the current ordinance does not allow for schools accredited by a State and/or national agency approved by the United States of America. We have received inquiries on this and it was determined that schools accredited by the Minnesota Office of Higher Education or another state or a regional accrediting agency approved by the US Department of Education, should also be acceptable on the application. Al. Budget Impact. None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 638 amending the Therapeutic Massage Enterprises and Massage Therapists Ordinance by amending Section 3 -18 -2: Definitions 2. Motion denying adoption of Ordinance No. 638 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Ordinance No. 638 ORDINANCE NO. 638 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE ENTERPRISES AND MASSAGE THERAPISTS ORDINANCE BY AMENDING SECTION 3 -18 -2: DEFINITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 3, Chapter 18 of the City Code of the City of Monticello is amended to add the following: 3 -18 -2 Accredited Institution — an educational institution holding accredited status with the United States Department of Education or which has been licensed or registered b the Minnesota Office of Higher Education or similar agency of another state or a regional accrediting agency approved by the US Department of Education. Section 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota on the 25th day of April, 2016. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: Brian Stumpf, Mayor City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 2H. Consideration to approve a Special Event Permit for a 5K Run/Walk on September 24th, 2016, sponsored by Party for a Purpose to benefit the Monticello Cancer Center; Applicant: Party for a Purpose /Thurber, Tara (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of a special event permit for the 5K Party for a Purpose Run/Walk, including several associated considerations: a) Approval for use of City equipment including cones, barricades, tables and trash receptacles b) Approval for city staff assistance for preparation and set -up C) Waiver of permit fee Special event permits are required in circumstances in which city resources (parks, labor, equipment, street closures, etc.) are utilized, as a means of obtaining Council authorization for the use of requested resources. This community event is proposed to occur Saturday, September 24th, 2016, from 3 PM to 10 PM, and is being hosted by the Party for a Purpose Committee. A narrative has been provided by the applicant. A site map illustrating the proposed configuration of the designated route is included in the supporting data. Similar to 2015, the route would begin and end on the north side of 7th Street, at the VFW Post. The organizers have been coordinating with the Street Superintendent related to construction activity in the area and are aware of potential route impacts. They will continue to coordinate as that project moves forward relative to the event. In addition to the use of City boulevards for the event, the Party for Purpose Committee is seeking City assistance for providing barricades, cones, trash receptacles, picnic tables, and the set -up of those items. All event parking will occur on VFW site, or on Cedar Street. No closure of City parking lots is required for this event. The applicant has also requested waiver of application fee. The Sheriff's Office has been notified of the event and has responded with comments, noting that Party for a Purpose will be hiring (at their cost) 2 deputies to provide security during the evening outdoor live band and that the Sheriff's Office will be provide staffing to cover any traffic needs during their 5K run. The applicant has provided a certificate of insurance for the event with the City named as additional insured. Al. Budget Impact: The permit application waiver of fee impact is $50.00. City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 A2. Staff Workload Impact: Party for a Purpose is requesting City assistance for delivery and pick -up of barricades and cones. These will be delivered to VFW Post and picked up during regular staff hours by the Parks Department (estimated 2 hours). The Street Superintendent will prepare a site plan for barricade and cone placement. The Streets Department will be responsible for placing and removing all street barricades and signage (estimated 2 hours). B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit for Party for a Purpose 5K on September 24th, 2016, allowing temporary use of City equipment, staff assistance and waiver of permit fee as described in the staff report of April 25th, 2016; contingent on: a. Continued site plan coordination with the Street Superintendent b. Continued coordination with the Wright County Sheriff's Office. 2. Motion to deny Special Event Permit for Party for a Purpose 5K event on September 24th, 2016. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Application & Narrative — Party for a Purpose 5K • Map Image showing proposed routing 2 marlticdo CITY OF MON'1 IC']EiLLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Special Events Pam k Monticello, MN 55362 (763)295-2711 . info(aki.monticello.mn.us Application ECheci Hst PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address Property Legal Description Property ID Number PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Owner Name T ,77 ff 7—T Owner Address PT C .E 411— _ Owner Phone Owner Email APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name Applicant Address , l V "� l� U ,� 17•L��t�� �. Applicant Phone Applicant Email Name of Event Location /Address of Event -71 : C,101- Dates & Times of Event 2 (G - Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the Community Development Department. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 14 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that special event permits are a zoning permit. Liquor licensing and permitting requires separate review. A special event permit DOES NOT grant or include any liquor license or permit for your event. Please contact the Monticello City Clerk's office regarding liquor licensing and regulations, Sign permits may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and /or City property (including rights of way) and /or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may also require review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. D [E C[E 07/24/15 1 _ 1 APPLICANT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CITY CHECK -IN CHECK A written narrative including: 1. A description of the proposed special event, how it will function on the property, hours and dates of operation, and any other information necessary to fully describe the request; and 2. An explanation of how the proposed special event will meet each of the review criteria specified by code (on reverse), as well as any additional criteria that may apply for the specific use. 3. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment and City property (including rights of way) and /or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council A site plan showing all information necessary to accurately depict how the proposed use will function on the site. Information required on the site plan shall include but not be limited to: 1. The location of all existing and proposed structures; 2. Driveways and parking areas; 3. Proposed storage spaces; 4. Natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, shorelines, etc; 5. Proposed number of parking spaces (if applicable). If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a survey may be required to be submitted with the application in addition to a site plan. Certificate of insurance /liability coverage. Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above. Application fee of $50.00. Special Event Review Process • The Community Development Department will review all Temporary Use Permit applications. • Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Monticello Zoning Code Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) and listed below shall be approved by the Community Development Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments. • Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) shall be denied by the Community Development Department. • A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria Approval of a Temporary Use Permit shall only be granted once the Community Development Department has determined the use shall: o Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety, or general welfare; o Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site; m Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods; 07/24/15 Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria, Cont. • Not include permanent alterations to the site; • Not maintain temporary signs associated with the use or structure after the activity ends; • Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the site; • Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property; and • Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event to occur, as well as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic movement associated with the temporary use, without disturbing environmentally sensitive lands. • Not create an unreasonable risk of significant: 1. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear; 2. Injury to persons; 3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances; 4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or pedestrian travel; 5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash removal, maintenance, or other public services demands; and 6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare. The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the particular location requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event. The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at the same location in a manner that will negatively impact the public health, welfare, or safety. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Conditions of Approval In approving the Temporary Use Permit for the special event, the Community Development Department is authorized to impose such conditions upon the issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize any potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the condition relates to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed special event. The Community Development Department is authorized, where appropriate, to require: 1. Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and egress. 2. Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of glare or direct illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and heat. 3. Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards. 4. Provision of sanitary and medical facilities. 5. Provision of solid waste collection and disposal. 6. Provision of security and safety measures. 7. Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event. 8. Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities. 9. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the special event to a shorter time period than that requested or specified in this subsection. 10. Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary facilities or structures used for such proposed special event will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former condition. Duration of Permit A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this subsection shall be limited to a maximum duration of 14 days per site per calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Community Development Department. 07/24/15 Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. 0- ! Applicant's Statement This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Date) 1 z< CITY APPROVAL (Zoning Administrator Signature) (Date) (Community Development Director Signature) (Date) Special Event Permit Approved ❑ Denied ❑ Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Admin Parks Streets Director Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room /Park Reservations Monticello Community Center Room /Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Post - Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room /Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete 07/24/15 4 Proposal for Special Event Permit 3/31/16 The Party For a Purpose committee is seeking a Special Event Permit for our 5" Annual 5k Run /Walk Event Proposal: Hosting a 5k Run /Walk that will start and end at VFW Post 8731 to fundraise money to be gifted to the local Cancer Center and local families who are currently in treatment hosted by Party for a Purpose. Date of the event: Saturday, Sept. 24th, 2016 3:00pm- 10:00pm We would like to have the 5k start and end at the front entrance of the VFW. Our proposed course is the same as years past with the start and end of the run on Cedar St in front of the VFW. Leaving the VFW on Cedar St, going down to 3'd St taking a right and heading down to Washington St taking a left up to Cty Rd 39 and heading to Highland Way (Target & Pet Smart Road), taking a right on 7th St (also directing runners to stay on side walk), then taking a left onto Cedar St back to the VFW. • Restrooms: The VFW Post 8731 (if more than 200 registrants will supply port -a- potty) • Parking: VFW Post 8731 parking lot and on street. • We would have 4 reserves from Wright County monitoring traffic for the runners • We will have 2 Deputies from Wright County on site during the Band from 5pm to 9pm. Our Event this year will include the local teacher band Outside Recess. They will be playing outdoors (weather permitting) from 6pm -10pm in the parking lot of the VFW next to the garage on site. We would also like to request from the City the following: • 20 picnic tables • 2 barriers • 6 large trash bins • 50 Cones Lastly we would like to request that our permit fee be waived by the city due to this event being a fundraiser for local cancer patients and the Monticello Cancer Center. IL 'L. N Cl) u c3 L v d w tt) O ti I U .ti O. 9 9 a m` �N aT a� 8i >E �N L F 2 d City Council Agenda — 04/25/2016 2I. Consideration to annrove a reauest for an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Development and Final Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) and approval of development agreement for Jerry Hartung Addition for a single lot development in the B -4 (Regional Business) District. Applicant: Retail Partners Monticello, LLC Applicant: Retail Partners Monticello, LLC C /AS) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 1, Jerry Hartung Addition. Address: 9281 Cedar Street Planning Case Number: 2016 -013 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): 1. Site plan review 2. Conditional use permit PUD — Development and Final Stage Deadline for Decision: May 6, 2016 Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: PUD, with B -4 Regional Business District Overlay The purpose of the `B -4" regional business district is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region Overlays /Environmental Planned Unit Development Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Vacant lot Surrounding Land Uses: North: B -4 Regional Business District East: B -4 Regional Business District South: B -4 Regional Business District West: B -4 Regional Business District Project Description: The applicant has proposed the construction of a new building on a vacant lot. The lot is approximately 49,350 square feet. The proposed building will be 3,520 square feet and will contain a dentist's office. The site will contain 41 parking spaces and two handicapped accessible parking spaces. City Council Agenda — 04/25/2016 The applicant is also applying for a conditional use permit to amend the existing planned unit development to allow the parking lot to connect to parking lots located to the north and south of the proposed development site. The planned unit development was last amended in 2011 with the platting of the Jerry Hartung Addition. ANALYSIS Planning Commission Action. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed CUP -PUD at a public hearing on April 5, 2016. There was nobody from the public appearing to speak to the proposal. The Commission discussed the recommendations of staff, and the applicants indicated that they are prepared to meet the conditions laid out in the staff report. The applicant provided additional information showing compliance with the staff comments. Specifically, an alternative site plan was provided that illustrated changes to the lighting design, parking layout, and trash enclosure location that met the proposed staff changes. Following the discussion, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit PUD, with the conditions in Exhibit Z. Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review. In the B -4, Regional Business District, Clinics / Medical Uses are listed as a permitted use in the B -4 District. The proposed dental clinic would be a reasonably expected use in a business district. The use is compatible with the surrounding area which includes multi - tenant commercial buildings to the south and north; and a Wal -Mart store to the east. General Description. The building is located on the south - central part of the property, in line with the commercial buildings to the north and south. The building will be one story tall which is consistent with the other buildings. The site will have 43 parking stalls. Site Landscaping. The applicant has proposed extensive landscaping around the building and parking lot. The plan consists of deciduous trees; coniferous trees; coniferous shrubs; sod; rock ground cover; and mulch. The materials are reflective of those in the other portions of the PUD. 2 City Council Agenda — 04/25/2016 The site is 1.14 acres in area, and the perimeter of the building measures 240 linear feet. The zoning ordinance requires 10 caliper inches of tree per acre, and 2 shrubs per 10 feet of building perimeter. This results in a quantity requirement of 11 caliper inches of tree planting, and 48 total shrubs. The plan proposes a total of 12.5 inches of tree planting (plus on evergreen tree), and 95 individual shrubs and perennial plants. The total number of shrubs and caliper inches of trees meets the requirements of the code. The applicant has noted that this site is part of a larger PUD and the landscaping plan is set to meet the requirements of the B -4 zoning district. The landscaping plan also notes that the PUD has an irrigation system. The irrigation system is intended to be expanded to this site. Building Height. The maximum height for structures in the B -4 District is 30 feet. The building plan shows the front fagade at a maximum height of 25 feet, 6 inches, and an average height of 22 feet, compliant with code. Signage. The site plan shows a wall sign on each of the four walls of the building. While the other businesses in the PUD have two wall signs per business use (typically one on the front of the building, and one of the back), the proposed sign plan is consistent with the sign ordinance requirements, and compatible with the wall signage displays in nearby buildings. The site plan also contains a pylon sign that measures 22 feet in height. The sign is 12 feet in width by five feet in height for a total of 60 square feet which is consistent with code maximums. However, the zoning ordinance requires that pylon signs wrap the pole in an approved material, and the other pylon signs in the PUD utilize a square metal framing. The proposed pylon sign for this site should be designed to be consistent with the design utilized in the PUD. Trash Enclosure. The development stage site plan provided for a trash enclosure on the southeast part of the property. The enclosure is made of materials that are consistent with those of the principal building. However, for recent development, the City has required trash enclosures to be attached to the principal building or interior to the building, particularly when facing a public street. As such, the trash handling equipment was recommended to be relocated to an enclosure attached to the building. The applicant has designed an alternative with the final stage application consistent with these requirements. It is noted that parking is more than adequate on the site (see below), and the loss of a few parking spaces to accommodate the relocated trash enclosure will still meet requirements. Parking. The site plan includes 41 parking spaces and two accessible spaces. By code, a building containing a clinic is required one parking space for 250 square feet of building. Therefore, a 3,520 square foot building would be required to provide 14 parking spaces. The parking plan exceeds the required code. The parking on this site is also designed to facilitate common access and parking with adjoining parcels. The 3 City Council Agenda — 04/25/2016 proposed parking plan would accommodate this cross use, and would also accommodate any future intensification of use on the property. Site access. The site does not have direct access onto Cedar Street. The access will be shared with the strip mall to the north of the site. The applicant has applied for a n amendment to conditional use permit for PUD to allow site access via the parking lot to the north; as well as connect to the parking lot to the south of this site. Since this plan is part of a larger PUD, staff believes that access to the site is consistent with the original PUD plans. Lighting Plan. The applicant intially submitted a lighting plan that included four light poles at 27 feet in height and lights on two sides. By code, the maximum height for lighting is 25 feet. The applicant has adjusted to meet the height requirement. The lighting fixtures shall match other lighting fixtures in the PUD. The plan also shows that the lighting will be present across the entire parking lot and drive aisles. The site plan shows lighting at the property line on all sides of the property, however, the site is adjacent to other commercial retail uses in the area and is not expected to be a concern. Other Site Improvements. The City Engineer's comments have been provided in a separate letter, dated March 30, 2016. Those comments include a requirement for verification of sanitary sewer, water, and stormwater control on and around the site. The comments are incorporated into this report by reference. The applicants have provided revised plans and a comment letter to address these items. Any substantive changes to the site plan resulting from engineering changes may require further processing. Final State PUDIDevelopment Contract The applicant has provided a comment letter detailing their intent to meet all required conditions of approval. As required with final stage PUD submittals, the applicant has also submitted revised plan sets and supplemental materials illustrating changes as required by conditions of the development stage PUD. These include the relocation of the trash handling area, the height reduction and style of the lighting fixtures and the notation to match sign design. The cross easement document for parking and access has also been provided and is referenced in the development contract. Any outstanding items referenced by the City Engineer in the March 30th comment letter are subject to compliance per conditions in Exhibit Z. Staff has prepared a development contract relating to the conditional use permit for PUD for the site. The development contract details the required conditions of approval, including the recognition of cross easement for parking and access (which are further detailed in a recorded private covenant and easement document). The development agreement also specifies for the financial development requirements associated with development, including trunk fees and landscaping security. In L, City Council Agenda — 04/25/2016 addition, a previously approved and recorded assessment agreement for the future extension of Cedar Street is described in the document. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2016 -025, approving the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit PUD and development contract for Lot 1, Block 1 Jerry Hartung Addition, based on findings in the resolution, and incorporating the conditions in Exhibit Z of this report. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2016 -025, approving the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit PUD and development contract for Lot 1, Block 1 Jerry Hartung Addition, based on findings to be identified during the Council's discussion. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the site plan, Conditional Use Permit for Development and Final Stage PUD amendment, and development contract for Lot 1, Block 1 Jerry Hartung Addition, subject to the conditions as identified in Exhibit Z. D. SUPPORTING DATA • Exhibit Z — Conditions of Approval • Resolution 2016 -025 • Development Contract — Lot 1, Block 1, Jerry Hartung Addition • Resolution PC- 2016 -007 • Aerial Image • Applicant Narrative and Supplemental Narrative • Applicant Response to Staff Comments • Site Survey • Cover Sheet • Site Plan • Grading Plan • Erosion Control Plan • Utility Plan • Civil Details • Landscape Plan • Building Elevations • Floor Plan • Sign Plan • Lighting Plan • City Engineer's Comments 5 City Council Agenda — 04/25/2016 EXHIBIT Z Amendment to Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development (Development Stage) Lot 1, Block 1, Jerry Hartung Addition. 9281 Cedar Street 1. The trash handling equipment shall be relocated to an area attached to, or within, the principal building, or in a reasonable location that is not in a yard adjoining a public street. 2. The parking lot light fixtures shall match the existing PUD in style and height. 3. Wrap the proposed freestanding sign pole to match the style of other freestanding signs in the PUD. 4. Applicant shall provide documentation of the easement and maintenance agreement for cross access and parking with the properties to the north and south. 5. Compliance with the requirements and comments of the City Engineer in the review letter dated March 30, 2016. G CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A CONDITIONAL UNIT PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PUD FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMERCIAL CLINIC BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED USES ON THE FOLLOWING PARCEL: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, JERRY HARTUNG ADDITION. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to construct a dental clinic on a vacant parcel, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Jerry Hartung Addition; and WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned B -4, Regional Business, in which dental clinics are allowed as a permitted use; and WHEREAS, the proposed parking area requires continuation of the cross - parking and access agreement approved as a part of the original Planned Unit Development for the shopping center located on either side of the subject parcel; and WHEREAS, the proposed clinic and site improvements, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z, are consistent with the Zoning Ordinance requirements and original PUD design; and WHEREAS, the site plan is consistent with, and accommodates the cross - circulation between commercial properties as initially envisioned; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the matter at its regular meeting on April 5s', 2016 and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello hereby makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment will meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed amendment will not create undue burdens on public systems, including streets and utilities. 4. The proposed amendment will not create substantial impacts, visual or otherwise, on neighboring land uses. 5. The proposed amendment is found to be consistent with the proposed and planned improvements in the PUD. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-025 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Monticello City Council hereby approves the Conditional Use PermiVPlanned Unit Development and Development Contract for construction of a commercial building as recommended by the Planning Commission, subject to compliance with related codes and regulations for such use, and the following conditions: The trash handling equipment shall be relocated to an area attached to, or within, the principal building, or in a reasonable location that is not in a yard adjoining a public street. 2. The parking lot light fixtures shall match the existing PUD in style and height. 3. Wrap the proposed freestanding sign pole to match the style of other freestanding signs in the PUD. 4. Applicant shall provide documentation of the easement and maintenance agreement for cross access and parking with the properties to the north and south. 5. Compliance with the requirements and comments of the City Engineer in the review letter dated March 30, 2016. ADOPTED this 25th day of April, 2016, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL 0 ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LOT 1, BLOCK I, JERRYHARTUNGADDmoN THIS AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ( "Agreement ") is made this day of 2016, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City") and KLEINBANK, a Minnesota banking corporation ( "Developer"). RECITALS A. The City and SB 22, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, the Developer's predecessor, previously entered into a Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development Contract dated April 29, 2008, and filed of record with the Wright County Recorder on July 24, 2008 as Document Number A1094023 ( "Development Contract') for the Jerry Hartung Addition Planned Unit Development (the "PUD "). B. The Developer is now the fee owner of the property within the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Jerry Hartung Addition (the "Property"). 186579A C. According to paragraph 2.G of the Development Contract, additional review is required prior to the development of the Property, and full conditional use permit review and approval is required to accommodate the shared access arrangement on the Property. D. The Developer has requested approval to construct a one -story building in the B4 Regional Business District consisting of approximately 3,520 square feet. The development of the Property will contain a dentist's office. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL. On April 25th, 2016, the City approved an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 1, JERRY HARTUNG ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota (the "Development 2. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. The City approved the amendment to conditional use permit for Planned Unit Development, based on the following conditions: A. The trash handling equipment shall be relocated to an area attached to, or within, the principal building, or in a reasonable location that is not in a yard adjoining a public street. B. The parking lot light fixtures shall match the existing light fixtures within the PUD in style and height. C. The proposed freestanding sign pole shall be wrapped to match the style of other freestanding signs within the PUD. D. Developer agrees to abide by the Declaration of Easements, Covenants and Restrictions dated April 28, 2008, and recorded April 30, 2008 as Wright County document number A1086928, which affects the Property. Developer shall maintain a cross access and parking easement and maintenance agreement for cross access and parking with the properties to the north and south for access to public right of way and parking. E. The development shall comply with the requirements and comments of the City Engineer in the review letter dated March 30, 2016. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Development shall be developed in accordance with the plans submitted for amendment of conditional use permit review and approved on April 25th, 2016 ( "Approved Development Plans "), except as modified by the approved conditions noted herein. The ]86579v4 Approved Development Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement but shall be kept in the Property file held by the City. 4. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the Development, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, street, utilities, public or private improvements or any buildings until this Agreement has been fully executed by both parties, filed with the City Clerk and recorded against the Property. Such recording shall be made in the office of the Wright County Recorder as promptly as possible after it has been executed by the City and an original thereof delivered to Developer. 5. CEDAR STREET ASSESSMENT. Developer agrees to abide by the Special Assessment Agreement dated April 14, 2008, and recorded February 10, 2009 as Wright County document number A1108643, which affects the Property. The assessment has an escalator clause intended to reflect the increase in construction cost over time. Said assessment is deferred until the construction/extension of Cedar Street is completed. 6. SANITARY SEWER ACCESS CHARGE. The sanitary sewer access charge in the amount of $3,316.00 shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. The total charge shall be adjusted to reflect the rate in effect at the time of the issuance of a building permit for the Property. 7. WATER MAIN ACCESS CHARGE. The water main access charges in the amount of $2,452.00 shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. The total charge shall be adjusted to reflect the rate in effect at the time of the issuance of a building permit for the Property. 8. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHARGE. The stormwater management system fee in the amount of $3,543.00 including an alternate ponding fee in the amount of $7,277.00, for a total of $10,820.00 shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. The total charge shall be adjusted to reflect the rate in effect at the time of the issuance of a building permit for the Property. 9. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional 186579v4 erosion control and storm water requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within five (5) days after the completion of the work, weather permitting, or in an area that is inactive for more than ten (10) days unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer. Seeding shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification, except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan. Seeding may include certified oat seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be maintained as necessary for seed retention. 10. GRADING PLAN AND CERTIFICATION. The Property shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading plan, stormwater control measures and erosion control plan. The plan shall conform to City of Monticello specifications. The Developer shall provide the City with the "as- built" grading plan and will include a certification that the grading following construction activities has been undisturbed or has been returned to the state required in the grading plan. 11. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement, the underground sanitary sewer and water main lying within public easements, except for private service lines, shall become City property without further notice or action. 12. SECURITY. A landscaping security shall be submitted by Developer with the building permit application. Such security guarantees that in exchange for the building permit, the owner will construct, install and maintain all items shown on the approved plan and that they will replace and/or correct any deficiencies or defaults that occur in the plan for a period of one complete year or two complete growing seasons subsequent to the complete installation according to the approved landscaping plan. 13. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. The Developer shall pay all actual costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the Property, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Agreement, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the Property. At the completion of the project and following payment of all 186579A expenses related to the project, the City shall return the remainder of any deposited funds for this purpose to the Developer. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attomeys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement, including engineering and attomeys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this Agreement. This is an obligation ofthe Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells the Property. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18 %) per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to building permit fees. 14. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 186579A 15. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Developer agrees to follow all recommendations provided in the City Engineer's letter dated March 30, 2016, which is incorporated herein. Any changes to the site plan resulting from the City Engineer's letter may require further processing and approval by the City. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. C. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. F. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the Property and /or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. The Parties to this Agreement acknowledge that the property is under contract to be sold by Developer, and upon closing of that sale the new owner will assume all rights and obligations of Developer and upon submission of proof and recording of that event the City will consider and may approve a release of the undersigned Developer from this Agreement. G. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage 1865790 insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000.00 for one person and $1,000,000.00 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000.00 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000.00 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 16. NOTICES. Required notice to either party shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered or mailed by certified mail at the following addresses: City: City of Monticello Attention: City Administrator 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Developer: Kleinbank 1550 Audubon Road, Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318 17. DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT. Except as specifically provided herein, the Development Contract remains unchanged and in full force and effect. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Development Contract. 186579v4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed this day of 2016. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank Signatures pages follow.] 186579A CITY: CITY OF MONTICELLO (SEAL) Brian Stumpf, Mayor And Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2016, by Brian Stumpf and Jeff O'Neill, the Mayor and City Administrator, respectively, of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 186579A DEVELOPER: KLEINBANK 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2016, by the of KLEINBANK a Minnesota Banking Corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 iii 186579v4 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -007 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to construct a dental clinic on a vacant parcel, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Jerry Hartung Addition; and WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned B4, Regional Business, in which dental clinics are allowed as a permitted use; and WHEREAS, the proposed parking area requires continuation of the cross - parking and access agreement approved as a part of the original Planned Unit Development for the shopping center located on either side of the subject parcel; and WHEREAS, the proposed clinic and site improvements, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z, are consistent with the Zoning Ordinance requirements and original PUD design; and WHEREAS, the site plan is consistent with, and accommodates the cross - circulation between commercial properties as initially envisioned; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the matter at its regular meeting on April 5`h, 2016 and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment will meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed amendment will not create undue burdens on public systems, including streets and utilities. 4. The proposed amendment will not create substantial impacts, visual or otherwise, on neighboring land uses. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -007 5. The proposed amendment is found to be consistent with the proposed and planned improvements in the PUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the proposed Conditional Use Permit amendment is hereby recommended for approval, with the following conditions: The trash handling equipment shall be relocated to an area attached to, or within, the principal building, or in a reasonable location that is not in a yard adjoining a public street. 2. The parking lot light fixtures shall match the existing PUD in style and height 3. Wrap the proposed freestanding sign pole to match the style of other freestanding signs in the PUD. 4. Applicant shall provide documentation of the easement and maintenance agreement for cross access and parking with the properties to the north and south. 5. Compliance with the requirements and comments of the City Engineer in the review letter dated March 30, 2016. ADOPTED this 5h day of April, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION M ATTEST: Brad Fyle, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 0 V C 0 O V a Y v M v V) v IH co N ol O e-I H r N LA N a•-I C O N a Q to C y7 L L H Y V 0 m r-i 0 � � i. � � Vii` • _ R � nec w. w � n � •6 , 4 s R ft op R a^ � Q _ ti -S �t. .f I�� �• •`4i ft. st. - "F^ _ 0 �?p A- Development Management Group, LLC Angela Schuman City of Monticello Development and Planning 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 271 -3224 RE: Project Narrative for Conditional Use and PUD Amendment Submittal Proposed Aspen Dental 9281 Cedar Street - Lot 1 Block 1 Jerry Hartung Addition Dear Angela, March 4, 2016 On behalf of the applicant, Retail Partners Development Monticello, LLC we are providing this narrative as a supplement to the drawings, exhibits and other materials being presented relating to our request for approval for a Conditional Use and PUD Amendment for our project. Based on the date of our submittal we would anticipate placement on the 04/05/16 Planning Commission and subsequent 04/25 City Council agendas. The subject property is an existing, undeveloped 1.14 acre tract otherwise known as Lot #1 Block #1 of the Jerry Hartung Addition and is further listed as PID #155210001010. Our project proposes to develop the site for the use of an Aspen Dental which will include a 3,520 SF single story building along with associated site improvements. The subject site is a part of the existing PUD and has a base zoning of B -4. The proposed development of the site does not include a request to amend the current zoning designation. What follows below is our formal response to the various considerations that are a part of the City's CU request process: The conditional use will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity of the subject property; The underlying zoning on this property is B -4 which allows the planned use by right. Additionally this property is a part of larger development that is made up of comparable commercial and retail uses. The conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or welfare of persons residing or working near the use; Aspen Dental is a nationally recognized retail- oriented company that provides affordable dental care to the communities they are a part of. The conduct of their day -to -day business does not include chemical processing, noxious odors, load noises, etc. The conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property for permitted uses predominant in the area; As stated above, Aspen Dental is a nationally recognized company and is a use that is compatible with all of the other retail uses already developed in this area. i 4209 Gallatin Pike I Nashville, TN 37216 1 (615) 227 -5863 1 www.devmgmt.com The conditional use will not pose an undue burden on public utilities or roads, and adequate sanitary facilities are provided; The roadway and utility infrastructure in this area was constructed in anticipation of this property being developed commercially. Further all public utilities, including sanitary sewer, are available to the property. Additionally this particular use is a low - volume traffic generator that sees an average of 40 customers per day (Monday thru Friday) and therefore will not contribute a great amount of traffic to the roadway systems on a given business day. The conditional use can provide adequate parking and loading spaces, and all storage on the site can be done in conformance with Coty code requirements. The City's minimum parking requirement for a clinic /medical service use is based on 4 spaces per 1,000 SF of floor area. With a 3,520 SF building planned for this project we will be required to provide a minimum of 14 spaces - our current site plan anticipates 43 spaces inclusive of any required for handicap accessibility. Any storage associated with this use will occur inside the building. There is a masonry trash enclosure proposed to be placed along the rear of the site and will be designed and constructed to match the architecture of the building as well as provide an effective and opaque screen of the trash receptacles. The conditional use will not result in any nuisance including but not limited to odor, noise, or sign pollution. As stated above this business will not produce any of these issues. The conditional use will not unnecessarily impact natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, and shorelines; and all erosion control will be properly controlled. This site is not affected by any woodlands, wetlands or shorelines; therefore the development as planned will have no impact on these matters. Additionally the developer will be required, by both local and national criteria, to both provide and maintain adequate erosion control onsite during the course of construction. The conditional use will adhere to any applicable additional criteria outlined in Chapter 5 of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance for the proposed use. Our proposed development and any requests associated with required plan approvals and permits do not include any requests for deviation or variance from any requirements noted in the zoning ordinance. Below is some additional information relating to Aspen Dental: Aspen Dental operates Monday thru Friday each week, and will occasionally see patients on Saturdays by appointment only. Typical hours of operation are: • Monday thru Wednesday 7:30 am to 5:30 pm • Thursday 10:00 am to 8:00 pm • Friday 8:00 am to 1:0o pm A typical Aspen Dental employees 7 -8 staff that include an office manager, receptionist, doctor, lab tech, hygienist and dental assistants. 2 4209 Gallatin Pike I Nashville, TN 37216 1 (615) 227 -5863 1 www.devmgmt.com Please review the information we have provided with this submittal and let me know if you have any questions or if additional information may be needed to facilitate your review and our placement on the 04/05 agenda. Thanks for all of your help! Sincerely, DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC Vice President cc: Mark Banks, RPD Charlie Vaughn, Cherry & Associates 3 4209 Gallatin Pike I Nashville, TN 37216 1 (615) 227 -5863 1 www.devmgmt.com Development Management Group, LLC Angela Schuman City of Monticello Development and Planning 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 271 -3224 RE: Supplemental Narrative for Conditional Use and PUD Amendment Submittal Proposed Aspen Dental 9281 Cedar Street - Lot 1 Block 1 Jerry Hartung Addition Dear Angela, March 17, 2016 As requested by Kerry Burri in her letter to Mr. Mark Banks, dated 03/15/16, this letter shall serve as a supplement to the information already submitted for this project relating to the Conditional Use and PUD Amendment requests. As per the prior applications and submittal materials, this letter is being submitted on behalf of the proposed developer and applicant Retail Partners Monticello, LLC. We are in receipt of the'Summary of Expenses /Finance Plan' form you forwarded to me (attached to this letter). This form provides a listing of the various costs and bonding that are typically required by an applicant as part of developing a given project While all categories listed will not specifically be applicable to this project, the applicant acknowledges that there are potential costs associated with: • Trunk Area Charges relating to parks, roadways, sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer systems. • City Fees pertaining to legal, planning, engineering & inspection, and permits • Additional Letters of Credit and bonding required for landscaping, restoration & preservation and grading work. As noted above not all of these costs will be applicable to this project, but it is acknowledged that during the final plan process these fees will be calculated by the city based on construction costs and other means, and that those fees and bonds must be posted as a condition to obtaining the necessary permits for development of this project, Please review the information we have provided with this submittal and let me know if you have any questions or if additional information may be needed to facilitate your review and our placement on the 04/05 agenda. Thanks for all of your help! Sincerely, DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC cc: Mark Banks, Retail Partners Monticello, LLC Charlie Vaughn, Retail Partners Monticello, LLC 1 4209 Gallatin Pike I Nashville, TN 37216 1 (615) 227 -5863 1 www.devmgmt.com MEMORANDUM TO: Angela Schumann, AICP - City of Monticello FROM: Clark D. Lohr CC: Shibani Bissan, PE - WSB & Associates DATE: 4/12/2016 PROJECT: 16033 —Aspen Dental Monticello SUBJECT: Response to staff report — Final PUD Application :. LOUCKS Following and enclosed, please find our response to items noted for revision or response within the staff report for planning commission consideration dated April 5, 2016: EXHIBIT Z 1. The development plan has been revised to comply with code requirements for trash handling facilities. Please see the enclosed plans for revised design. 2. The parking lot lighting has been revised to match existing fixtures adjacent to the subject parcel and the fixture height has been revised to meet code requirements. Please see the enclosed plans and fixture cut sheets for revised design. 3. The development plan has been revised to include a square architectural sheet metal surround on the freestanding sign pole. Please see the enclosed plans and for revised design. 4. Please find enclosed the PUD agreement noting the required maintenance agreement for cross access and parking with the properties to the north and south. 5. Please see below an itemized response denoting acceptance of the requirements and comments by the City Engineering ENGINEERING COMMENTS 1. Please find enclosed the letter approving the plat of Jerry Hartung Addition from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). 2. Noted - No work is planned within MnDOT right of ways. 3. Noted - Please find enclosed design calculations for the adjacent site accommodating drainage from the subject parcel. 4. Noted 5. Noted - plans have been revised to denote emergency overflow elevations (EOF) 6. Revised per comments. Please see enclosed plans 7. Noted - Irrigation plans will submitted with building permit documents 8. Revised per as -built documents 9. Revised per as -built documents 10. Revised per comments. Note added to cover sheet 11. Revised design to which eliminates water and sewer crossing 12. Noted - please reference C4 -1 Utility Plan note # 6 13. Noted - please reference C4 -1 Utility Plan note # 1 14. Revised to include applicable city details 15. Noted - the contractor is responsible for obtaining all required permits PLANNING I CIVIL ENGINEERING I LAND SURVEYING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I ENVIRONMENTAL w .louckslnc.com 1 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300, Maple Grove, MN 55369 1 763.424.5505 16. Noted - as built documents will be provided upon completion of construction 17. Noted - Plans will be signed with building permit application Page 2 It -/ ^ 5 \ \� ^�. � � � y <. . Ji h A'o ~ Z ` ^ ,\ ,7 JTrlccp Ill C. C61 CDVf45XFEi CSI 9IFPLW CN (FAp`IGRAN OLT FRJagrvCMIRIXMN ENT OVIL DEUN CELT [MI DUATS CELT EMLDSi E ` 11 -1 NNGICVEfl.W ALLAIMDSuit. I' 11D1OAfryIC511Eu FIOO . AollA4LHDMELEVTIONSILW AYp11 " HE'NLIEVAT10Ni MFESTANpNOY11QJACNF1EVAllgl GENERAL NOTES Eaiuirg mM'NOnsslvxey P^W'ee nl'INe 4legory GOUp, tnc D.RALIX5lnwys .HR)II C Im., 0$016 rdtla lwM—k - IN arantte MIM1eac[utaryaMcamplFeex IX wak EKINKi Try Mxvy Cams[IO Snal l lwliy Me PIM[[t ^IJ^Letwa� ei:<NPa�,I„M, nmeN. TIah CIY m wmi. i, w l< MHrexpnmink Mrarry aldObal-11 mcutN IM oazsw,landwitll Vaillims m 1M1euuw ax.lyiX lMdmNim pMhd b/IM c:." Mwimlh hz [vnraaaxnall eW milyall ekratimxantl n nihd .pmle[Tm6itlenNmYdic�qurFlef. PROJECT BENCHMARK Tep nN o(IOVkant Ircahy M IM no1M1LaH cpnn ri Xp prryN.ry. Ekwhn =965.M ASPEN DENTAL MONTICELLO, MN ZONING APPLICATION FOR: FINAL STAGE PUD AMENDMENT VICINITY MAP tZ R s aJ)L�l� SC.A�j,;A LEL PIK WARNING: IesmHHa s eEWMNNREfMC0THHC—wG 1NIAN Ell M110FS. THEY 4Wt[ -TE MIN nit UTILITY b IAm6M M4MA.n INDE1 I¢µ0 /HK V¢ 1,,, HTHNDL THE OO:@ CR.MµLCOMKrGLp11E0.5IMFMEGLLAT 651HSaoy3 AIpEASraelaulx .3m.waIDRTNE1KrnllDxs OrMLNNmmaND 5ry12IURfSEEIOµ gtFA Tk fdi TLN SHAAIL''lN OR RITNA TEMABI)N ITE�� IMWY'FO... rY 11 ILlCl¢M Al' NO DUST I4 THE ® Gophe r State One Call S. 1 �sr 8 r w r r 1 DESIGN CONSULTANTS OWNER /DEVELOPER RETAIL PARTNERS DE ELET MENT MARK BANKS Sm85TAN.D CWRT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 3ffli mbanksB¢Ia11pNm=Jer.[mm TEL 615A�KML2 DEVRDPMENTAUNAOER OE.I.ELFMMM1VAOEMENi KEN KNUCKLES 4=9 Gl LLC 4ID9 GLLATIN l4nucklnOtllvmgmLm m NASNNLLf.TENNE NE53Ff1R16 TEL 6153D -5863 CNIL ENGINEER LWOM, INC. TOODW. MCLOVTH, P.E. IMO HEMLOCK NNE M[IwN®TH,.' .xvn SUITE )W CNIIX D. LOHR MMLf ORf,MINN. 55369 a lTE uhsinc[an TN: 763-Ql�1505 NNWUxARCHETEa LOUCKS INC LOLTUM LOME, LA 7300 HENL NNE elcymOkµpM[ <om ITIET SW MVLf OROH,MINNES M 553 TEL: ]6]�29�5505 .EllR can ARCHITLCTS ST EVE COOFVt, AIA. ]SO OLD HKI(ORV BLVD Laru'BeandlarcF.am SUITE 350 RRENIWOO), TENNESSEE 37037 TEL: 615-37] -3111 on LOUCKS wNOSm�nq IMMENSE .WCo0.'ll& „',. Monon IMn u ci' ms?cMN. ys[A°fIN� ..k.;a.aro,.rs[.��,n n,xx,x « r� NW'lS'N'W JMe) �. mrmcwm�;cu,a • „xvamxwnnwsue . »ea a ,wa.[mow[n�M w�nu x ' v.wmmmmcw y r. v, anrsrorwwxrv,x.rmu..ouucarw,. w , a LOUCKs MI uj J _ enu 0 u,u - rt'u U ro;s..[au, .w19•.m�:ioW:,`"i`r ".,�e"`vwo. = ' i`wd°, ua— �., ... mx,u.wuuuncxrvxa,mxw[r,vm ' ' u. rwu „urwwncwow wxnrrn.mua mii remwr « x,o „sl,mn,rnuu'erwvrt,mmxc[aum a mme w.,xd w Wou..uro, '. w ,� au„w;;.,. wx,.,wevw°<omwuwro;wmnxrw[.o v. axv,nvw 111 ..._ _ r ®wgxvcewztcunon[aw°zgasrcm„a xW x¢,ortm xrvn[d.q, x ._.. _ .. E3,2mpmfwnrr,r,.acomrx [ mw.rgn,r. �n.nu.....ne��.... 'r pceec;°z r.ve;uxm.,nu:,..n v,e. oR� ;w<n,wus,ncwuxwwm[,w„ a w,ry _ =Zm i W'rwww+ Ar.. _ erirs w Fm ® Gopher State One Call GuDINCNOM awa.zE�'KwM 4 d ss �m . [awnunm. �o Ntu rro xJnr[n [w xa.,a - .. • c �. .. _ 9u.LL •ix N wa �.,a r„ o w,� R ■■ LOUCKS 3 - q '[4 r - eFNCxeuxe�� ub µt rou ^ OFNfMI NOTFW -� i wwwxinex, x. LM I t O � +a. '°." epw.! •� w�vw � ',. w:urwf. u.wraanruH. _ wcm .art (r fl°r' m � �� N6�1�1 NJI33 _ by dt _ uore .sur erne a m - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - _ -~ -- ® Gopher State One Call ' n s 3 2 14 ti y I C O � I ox ,nc mrr.,n rtws.w.x, ¢ ramo.wrx ixn.w w.sx 0 i� —.—ID Al • t s OfHEIMI NOIF —� � o,.o w�nmavnnna[x,oxd[muwv .,o. .x. ,or,xm.aa..,.i. .or.w.,xroxr xs+o °mme nuv¢wrcmm w.arrt.wusw,n x[wx�w,�nv[ryrw�it y ... . PEEMPIRFQUIRFMENTS f♦f_ .` "j OyiM�q OtlRMEf�aR �'�jj �iM�iW� Mat.�— ,1 . xpurt�iwrnvrp,K� nrurtgn,. 4[ n1x .e44piam[xR.romnouygvmexronnwrt. anunwrocd« rx LOUCKS n[.M9lN¢E�OR:V{„nE %i® xM C O � I ox ,nc mrr.,n rtws.w.x, ¢ ramo.wrx ixn.w w.sx 0 —.—ID Al .n... m Rm ERO COMROENORS ox ,nc mrr.,n rtws.w.x, ¢ ramo.wrx ixn.w w.sx w.nr.-�m`wwwr —.—ID Al OfHEIMI NOIF —� o,.o w�nmavnnna[x,oxd[muwv .,o. .x. ,or,xm.aa..,.i. .or.w.,xroxr nuv¢wrcmm w.arrt.wusw,n x[wx�w,�nv[ryrw�it y ... . PEEMPIRFQUIRFMENTS f♦f_ [axq. U ulyr xpurt�iwrnvrp,K� nrurtgn,. 4[ n1x .e44piam[xR.romnouygvmexronnwrt. anunwrocd« rx LOUCKS u,K ERmMIOµN sOnNIRIXV �mouMiYRGGRMI[ aurrwmsxxnnwrtnxwxm ,rruvrxmorrtxva[, wvre,aurxw nnuwin,ruo wnnvxxne ¢xneuwrxnrsruumo.vuavunrlwmnwmr '_.. SITED NIFLENO —sr® �mnxurrcron (_� [mxrvcwxwrxenWnxix� ® Gopher mState One Call ox ,nc mrr.,n rtws.w.x, ¢ ramo.wrx ixn.w w.sx w.nr.-�m`wwwr —.—ID Al OfHEIMI NOIF —� o,.o w�nmavnnna[x,oxd[muwv .,o. .x. ,or,xm.aa..,.i. .or.w.,xroxr ..x. w.noiarw¢x,,.orwwn�.wer :�. w.^. PEEMPIRFQUIRFMENTS f♦f_ [axq. U ulyr xpurt�iwrnvrp,K� nrurtgn,. 4[ n1x .e44piam[xR.romnouygvmexronnwrt. anunwrocd« rx �� u,K SITED NIFLENO —sr® �mnxurrcron (_� [mxrvcwxwrxenWnxix� ® Gopher mState One Call n 3 U 2 2 ti ti M U"Lm NOTES I wrn� xm nLOUCKS � ��I �� � �' n.mlxR °w.aw..mcx.m,°anus aaurwwu.luw•i°.nMns'am�. .. ,.,. h..._a._. ' 1MMrIM.Nxm�nvul6. V eM" KMMM� gun '. maa�u.. rpm.r.mur.erm�um.xrprsmrumssrvvx 6'T 1 111 I 1 111 I { 111 I m I 1111 I I III I I 1111 I I wwiu I III I I III I ' 1111 Fm.Ma O ji 1 T —Ll Ibw I y I m .Im j % 1 � maw I % I N�i'MOewp I g w,W�<Om.awx 1 � 1 nl uwm'nN�wra I I na iunsuh I ®_ Gopher State One Call ^ ^ Ar I on LoUCKS ifl, I BMW A= "=wr C TI AS- PRRCAST MALLOW CAC" OAOW . .. . r -nw . ._w�. JL -L--- on LoUCKS Ar o� �ao w I - � W; R m q W on .sffwo:o9ma f01LNL[w9�C0.� w [ f PER ENNUI PLANING LI L �iewrv�' �a magi rwnww9- vi+mnwvK. wun- room.mxmaaoa. ixawnrua.se.omaxc mmcrmmx.w»aoas� �-04VN95APPNRW ww�nnursaxi mxrxaorzoium rumu MuM� a QSHRUB PUKING DFIXL y m LOUCKS u NOTES MEwERAL � °w awwmmuom ..ruuww�:�umr,mamrsw,�xcm m�� Y0 .,,,wr���w,r�� �a..•a�n ' o w m woommommin IANOSCVE INSTALLATION: non xwuv .mu. mmionn9mw.mnwo-rxcmm — �-- - wniw¢ wrmwnaauna�maeawu® atv +wxnns.m..�...A..x.R.00.aon.„ww m.. �.,c�wwwromrn.�ruo�a,.o,ww.wm,�. CYCIYY`NLT� 90 iV ° u xrvm r u Ar o� �ao w I - � W; R m q W on .sffwo:o9ma f01LNL[w9�C0.� w [ f PER ENNUI PLANING LI L �iewrv�' �a magi rwnww9- vi+mnwvK. wun- room.mxmaaoa. ixawnrua.se.omaxc mmcrmmx.w»aoas� �-04VN95APPNRW ww�nnursaxi mxrxaorzoium rumu MuM� a QSHRUB PUKING DFIXL y m LOUCKS u NOTES MEwERAL � °w awwmmuom ..ruuww�:�umr,mamrsw,�xcm m�� .,,,wr���w,r�� �a..•a�n awnm��xwm�,m..�, m woommommin IANOSCVE INSTALLATION: non xwuv .mu. mmionn9mw.mnwo-rxcmm — �-- - wniw¢ wrmwnaauna�maeawu® atv +wxnns.m..�...A..x.R.00.aon.„ww m.. �.,c�wwwromrn.�ruo�a,.o,ww.wm,�. xrvm ® Gopher State One Call IX-0 AFF T, . ING NAWNE 1 FRONT ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE E ♦ P.C. PROPOSED TWO BRENTWOOD COMMONS _ 750 OLD NICKORY BLVD. 9DITE J5D ITS D nD� �O BRENTWOOD, TN JTOZJ S3 FAI5..J77.MSACem MONTICELLO, MN 9320 CEDAR ST. APRIL 5, 2016 WAG UNIT VENEER 'ELECTRIC BLUE' METAL COPING BY FIRESTONE UNA-=D PRODUCTS 10'-0'AFF _ tr T. O. COPNG 6 NVAC UNIT j 35d AFF T.O. COPING Sad AFF IF T.O. COPING 31 -]'AFF TO. HVAC UNIT (APPROXIMATE) I$T FF 04 6NG ad AFF B.O. AWNING -- aA STO T.O. STONE VENEER ad AFF FIN.ROOR iii F no• RIGHT ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE IRE t X ARCHITECTS P.C. T OSRENTWOOD COMMONS OLD HICKORY BLV0. BREX1tM000, TH 3iOZT id750 P.615.311.3111 .3111 F.815.3ii.OeiB .eRI1SNtrchcem HVACUNR SIGNAGE BYOTHERS )1'.13'X3 o) WO.TSSO.FT.) PROPOSED AsMnDentd MONTICELLO, MN 9320 CEDAR ST. APRIL 5, 2016 -. HVAC MIT W / SCORED BLE FINE FR ISFB __ 1a8 AF To COP W 0 8 H VAC UNIT (aPPROKi _- WM MKS V1 to EIFS VENEER 11 SCORED V4ROOVE JOINTS (WOMBLE FINE FNISN) -'KMO BRO BRICK ROWLOCK BY ACME /- 'MEDITERRANEAN SLUE asw CLOTH A METALCOPINO TO AWNING SYSTEM BY SUHSRELLA MATCH OPNDYKE - LIGHT FIXTURE — %110OFS' � %OKO BROW' RUNNING BOND BRICK VENEER M ACME CASTSTONE WATERTABLE - 'SIENNA' DRYSTACK STONE VENEER BY DUTCHOUALITYSTONE (2-10'X tg-0� inen (53.880. FT.) -gL2V T.O. COPING 18'A'AFF T.O.0 FNG 13b'AFF T.O.AWNING t0d'AFF B.O.AWNING 5' W AFF B.O. LIGHT FIXTURE T O STF TO STONE VENEER 0' -V AFF IIN. FFOOR REAR ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED AvenDantaO MONTICELLO, MN 9320 CEDAR ST. APRIL 5, 2016 lF a H P.G. Rm � DMENTWOOD BRENTWOOD COMMONS + 150OLD.3111 HICKORY 7500 KVD. SUITE 250 DMBNTWODD, TN 31027 P.013AT.0T11 FsTa377F.0e7e WPnVwMiMNeroRCOm PROPOSED AvenDantaO MONTICELLO, MN 9320 CEDAR ST. APRIL 5, 2016 Ltr I F'tKSNEGTIVE NOT TO SCALE IRE • X ARCHITECTS P. G. TWO TO COMMONS + T60OLO OLD HICKORY BLVD. 3UIYE 230 BRENTWOOO, TN 370U P.613.3n.a111 41111 Ps13.an.a3Te 'www.Be„lafmhwm PROPOSED AsMnDeMd MONTICELLO, MN 9320 CEDAR ST. APRIL 5, 2016 MUM 1 I- 'tKJNtC: I IVt NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED AsMnDentd MONTICELLO, MN 9320 CEDAR ST. APRIL 5, 2016 E♦XREC OED COP.0. TSOBRENTVOOD COMMONS .F BlV0. 9uiw 250 >S15.3". aRENTWODD,i 370V P.615.3".3111 111 P.sls.sn.os7a `//x'w.aavlM1SrcROOm PROPOSED AsMnDentd MONTICELLO, MN 9320 CEDAR ST. APRIL 5, 2016 REAR PERSPECTIVE 1-4 E HARCMITOO Rm TWOBRENTKOOB COMMONS .f ?SDOLD BLVD. BLVD, a01TEMO BRENTWOOD, TN 376P P.618.3TT.3111 r.615.3n.osT6 sanenarcRwm PROPOSED AsspenDWaO MONTICELLO, MN 9320 CEDAR ST. APRIL 5, 2016 "' LV 1 IV C NOT TO SCALE I—q E- E N a SP.C. .C. gm eRRCHITEC BRENTWOOD COMMONS + 250 OLD HICKORY elVO. ]URE280 ..ENYWOCO, YN 3'X12] P.815.3T.]iH .3ill F.815.]Y1.08Y8 www.ulMNarcB.wm PROPOSED AspwDDD0 MONTICELLO, MN 9320 CEDAR ST. APRIL 5, 2016 V �V V lo� REM m Q � I I =L w RADIUS CORNERS 0 FABRICATED ALUMINUM CABINET PAINTED TO MATCH SW 6965 HYPER BLUE (FILLERAND2 ^RETAINERS) WHITE LEKANFACES W/ IST SURFACE GRAPHICS: 3M# 3630.167 BRIGHT BLUE VINYL W/ SHOW THRU WHITE COPYAND BORDER 2 ". 2" ALUMINUM RETAINER PAINT TO MATCH I SW 6965 HYPER BLUE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED W/80 HIGH OUTPU DAYLIGHT "ME FLUORESCENT LAMPS 60 SQ.FT. 8.625. O.D..322 WALL STEEL PIPE SUPPORT PAINTED TO MATCH SW 6965 HYPER BLUE ANTS, SQUARE POLE I SHROUD REVISED PLAN TO BE TED UNDER SEPERATE UNDERGROUND PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SERVICE FURNISHED TO SIGN BY CUSTOMERS ELECTRICIAN -SIGN CONTRACTOR TO MAKE FINAL CONNECTION AS DETERMINED BY LUCAL SIGN ORDINANCES "" DUA. R T' -0" DEEP CONCRETE PIER FOUNDATION D/F PYLON - OPTION 4 SCALE. v.•= Vw (1) REQUIRED - MANUFACTURE t INSTALL END VIEW AspenDental AeFen WnLl M[nt ft MN O /FSIngb Poy Pylon ooi�,[pnno.nui Mmuwlm B6 V101.16 nnnRlrtl�.I - -� Cc u1IE RIIIN.yIRR' TMe Oo[um.ni reo.a.anle en WLS LIGHTING SYSTEMS SNTS - 2 -3/8" (60m m) O.D. x 4 -3/4" (121 mm) Tenon 14' -39' (4.3m - 11.9m) Hand -hole 12" (305mm) Optional Standard Base Cover Projection (4) Anchor Bolts Foundation By Other Bolt -0n Mount 2-Bolt Pattern No Mounting Holes Single Flood Square Pole Top Pole Preparation Approved By: Location: Project Name: Date: SQUARE NON- TAPERED STEEL SNTS11SERIE SPECIFICATIONS POLE SHAFT - Pole shaft is elctro-welded ASTM -A500 Grade C steel tubing with a minimum Yield strength of 50,000 psi. On Tenon Mount steel poles, tenon is 2-3/8'0.D. high- strength pipe. Tenon is 4 -3/4" in length. Straight poles are 4 ", 5" and 6" square. HAND HOLE - Standard hand -hole location is 12" above pole base. Poles 22' and above have a 3"x 6" reinforced hand -hole. Shorter poles have a 2"x 4" non - reinforced hand -hole. BASE- Pole base is ASTM -A36 hot - rolled steel plate with a minimum yield strength of 36,000 psi. Two -piece square base cover is optional. ANC HOR BOLTS - Poles are furnished with anchor bolts featuring zinc - plated double nuts and washers. Galvanized anchor bolts are optional. Anchor bolts conform to ASTM -A36 with a minimum yield strength of 36,000 psi. GROUND LUG - Ground lug is standard DUPLEX RECEPTACLE- Weatherproof duplex receptacle is optional. GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER- Ground fault circuit interrupter FINISH - Each pole is finished with WIS DuraGrip® polyester powder coat finishing process to give the pole an exceptionally attractive appearance. The process electrostatically applies and thermally fuses a polyester powder to the pole. This unique protection process provides an extremely smooth and uniform finish which withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling. DuraGrip• finish features a five -year limited warranty. Standard finish colors available for poles are bronze, black, platinum plus, buff, white, satin verde green, metallic silver, and graphite. Optional DuraGrip• Plus features added protection with a 3.0 to 5.0 mil thickness of polyester- powder coat finish plus an inner coating. This specially designed inner coating is a thermal plastic hydrocarbon resin applied to the inside of the pole to seal and protect against atmospheric and corrosive matter. DuraGrip• Plus finish features a seven -year limited warranty. DETERMINING THE LUMINAIRVPOLE COMBINATION FOR YOUR APPLICATION • Select luminaire from Luminaire Ordering Information. • Select bracket configuration. • Refer to luminaire EPA chart to determine EPA value. • Select height of pole. • Select MPH to match the wind speed in the application area. (Windspeed Map located in Appendix) • Confirm the pole EPA that is equal to or exceeds the luminaire /bracket EPA as was previously determined. WL.S LIGHTING SYSTEMS P.O. Box 100519 s Fort Worth, TX 76185 1 800.633.8711 r Fax:817.735.4824 • www.wislighting.com 0 Consider the Impact! SpeclfiWicins subiectto change without notice. 01 Bev.8M TS11 SQUARE SN NON - TAPERED STEEL SERIES (EXAMPLE ORDER) WLS - SNTS- 24 -5 -11 D900 Y `-l� x.qn ou�x. ORDER: WLS -S NTS- FOOTNOTES: 1 -Pole heights will have +/- I!1• tolerance. STM BRZ NO NA CATALOG SHAFT SHAFT BASE BOLT ANCHOR WT. 80 MPH 90 MPH 100 MPH NUMBER LENGTH SIZE PLATE CIRCLE BOLT SIZE EPA EPA EPA It INFORMATION SELECT "r" IATE CHOICE FROM r t FORMULATE ORDER CODE. CATALOG MOUNTING NUMBER' CONFIGURATION POLE TOP FINISH OPTIONS ACCESSORIES 10-1/8"X3/4" 8"- 11" 3/4" X 30" 105 16.7 12.2 WLS - SNTS - 144.11 S - Single /Parallel SBO- Square pole, bolt -on mount, BRZ - Bronze GA- Galvanized Anchor Bolts 4111C -4 "Square Base Cover WLS - SNTS - 164-11 0380°- Double 2bolt pattern BLK - Black SF - Single Flood 50C -S° Square ease Cover WLS - SNTS -16 -5.11 090 ° - Double SPT- Square pole, pole top mount PLT - Platinum Plus OF - Double Flood 611C- 6"Square Base Cover WLS- SNTS - 184-11 DN90 "- Double STM - Square pole, tenon mount BUF -Buff DGP - DuraGrip "Plus ER2- Weatherproof Duplex WLS - SNTS - 18.5.11 T90 "- Triple SNN- Square pole, no mounting holes WHT -White LAB - Less Anchor Bolts Receptacle WLS -SNTS- 204.11 TN120' -Tdple or pole top caps SVG- Satin Verde Green NO No Options GFI- Ground Fault Circuit WLS - SNTS- 20 -5 -11 O90' -Quad 19.7 GPT - Graphite 10.1 WLS - SNTS- 20 -4 -11 WLS- SNTS-22 -4.11 ON90" -Quad 10-1/8"X3/4" MSV - Meallic Silver 3/4" X 30" MHPI- Mounting Hole Plugs WLS - SNTS - 22.5 -11 PT -Pole Top 2.2 WLS - SNTS- 20 -5 -11 20' 9V0 -Vibration Damper -g WLS -SNTS- 24.4.11 N - Tenon Mount WLS - SNTS -24 -5.11 (Standard tenon 22' 4" 4 "Square Pale Squioe Pole WLS- SNTS -26 -5-11 size is 2- 3 /8 "O.D.) 5VD -4 r- 22' I -For use with 1 O-1 /8" X 3/4" 1 9" - 11" 3/4" X 30" S- Square Pole 13.8 Internal slip6tter 5.5 W LS- SNTS -24411 24' 6VO •Vibration Damper - 6' Square Pole WLS - SNTS- 24 -5 -11 24' 5" 1-10-1/8"X 3/4" 1 NA - No Accessorles (EXAMPLE ORDER) WLS - SNTS- 24 -5 -11 D900 Y `-l� x.qn ou�x. ORDER: WLS -S NTS- FOOTNOTES: 1 -Pole heights will have +/- I!1• tolerance. STM BRZ NO NA CATALOG SHAFT SHAFT BASE BOLT ANCHOR WT. 80 MPH 90 MPH 100 MPH NUMBER LENGTH SIZE PLATE CIRCLE BOLT SIZE EPA EPA EPA WLS -SNTS -14411 14' 4' 10-1/8"X3/4" 8"- 11" 3/4" X 30" 105 16.7 12.2 9.0 WLS - SNTS - 16-4 -1 l 16' 4" 10-1/8"X 3/4" 8"- 11" 3/4"X30" 120 13.1 9.3 6.5 WLS - SNTS- 16 -5 -11 16' 5" 10-1/8'X3/4' 9'- 11" 3/4" X 30" 144 25.0 18.5 13.8 WLS -SNTS -18411 18' 4" 10-1/8"X 3/4" 8"- 11" 3/4" T3 135 WLS - SNTS- 18 -5 -11 18' 5" 10-1/8"X 3/4" 9"- 11" 3/4" X 30" 162 19.7 14.1 10.1 WLS - SNTS- 20 -4 -11 20' 4" 10-1/8"X3/4" 8'- 11" 3/4" X 30" 150 7.0 4.2 2.2 WLS - SNTS- 20 -5 -11 20' 5" 101 WLS - SNTS- 22 -4 -11 22' 4" WLS - SNTS- 22 -5 -11 22' 5" 1 O-1 /8" X 3/4" 1 9" - 11" 3/4" X 30" 198 13.8 S.9 5.5 W LS- SNTS -24411 24' 4" WLS - SNTS- 24 -5 -11 24' 5" 1-10-1/8"X 3/4" 1 9 WLS - SNTS- 26 -5 -11 26' S" 10 -1 /8" X 3/4" 9" - 11" 3/4' X 30" 234 7.6 3.8 1.0 EPA INFORMATION: All WLS Lighting Systems' poles are guaranteed to meet the EPA requirements listed. WLS Lighting Systems is not responsible if a pole order has a lower EPA rating than the Indicated wind- loading zone where the pole is located. CAUTION: This guarantee does not apply If the pole/bracket/6xture combination is used to support any other items such as flags, pennants, or signs, which would add stress to the pole. WLS Lighting Systems cannot accept responsibility for harm or damage caused in these situations. Approved By: Project Name: ■ ■ Location: Date: WLS LIGNTING SYSTEMS P.O. Box 100519 r Fort Worth, TX 76185 r 800.633.8711 r Fax: 817.735.4824 r www.wlslighting.com ■ Consider the Impact! 01 Rex.vua p WLS LIGHTING SYSTEMS Li Flat - lensed fixtures meet IESNA full cutoff classification 1 Milli! ABMNAONT I A 111 Ln,JJB n°SmM A B Note: House Side Shield adds to fixture EPA. consult factory. 1 BOLTONAW © C UL oa t18T• wel loatlon fVM Arm Mount 21- 518 "549mm 12- 3/4 "324mm FVR Arm Mount 21- 5/8'(549mm) 16- 1/8 "(410mm) BIES cket fW11.315.2 4 z Approved By: Location: 1919 Windsor Place s Fort Worth,TX 76110 Project Name: Date: FV VERTICAL LAMP/ FLAT GLASS LENS SERIES SPECIFICATIONS HOUSING -The FV Series formed aluminum housing is finished to produce a clean, sharp appearance and ensures weather -tight construction. Available in 2 sizes: Medium (reduced envelope 400 Watt Lamp) and Reduced (reduced envelope 1000 Watt Lamp). LENS/GASKET - A flat tempered glass lens is sealed to the housing with an EPDM gasket, preventing entry of moisture, dust and insects. Combined with the vertical burn feature, the Flat glass lens provides high performance lighting. TOP ACCESS - Is secured by four captive stainless steel fasteners and provides ease of installation and servicing. FINISHES -Each fixture is finished with a baked-on polyester powder finishing process to give the fixture an exceptionally attractive appearance. Standard finish colors include bronze, black, platinum and white. The polyesterfinish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling. Consult factory for available custom colors and pinstripe decal options. REFLECTORS/DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS -The FV Series fixture is available in five reflector systems and distribution patterns, all with vertical burn lamps: Type II (2), Type III (3), Type V (S), Perimeter Forward Throw (FP) and Super Reflector (SR) for a minimum mounting height of 30 feet Reflectors are field - rotatable, enabling generous Flexibility in distribution patterns without fixture movement. LIGHT SOURCES - Designed to operate with Pulse -Start Metal Halide, Natural White, Super Metal Halide, Metal Halide, Metal Halide Reduce Envelope or High Pressure Sodium. SOCKETS - Porcelain mogul -base sockets with spring - reinforced contacts. BALLAST -Pulse Start Metal Halide, Metal Halide, Super Metal Halide, and High Presure Sodium feature ahigh -power factor CWA ballast, and are designed for -20° F operation. BRACKETS -Arm Mount: 5 1/2 "x 21/2" x 12" length shipped standard. (An 8' bracket is avaiable for single or D780 configurations, but must be ordered separately from Options column of the ordering chart.) A Round Pole Plate (RPP) is required for mounting to 3 "- 5" round poles. (See Options in Luminaire Ordering Information.) DECAL STRIPING - WLS offers optional color- coordinated decals in 9 standard colors to accent the fixture. Decal is guaranteed for five years against peeling, cracking, or fading. WLS LIGNTING SYSTEMS 800.633.8711 . Fax: 817.735.4824 t www.wlslighting.com • Consider the Impact! Specifications subject tochange without notice. 01 Rev.2/15 FV SERIES VERTICAL LAMP /FLAT GLASS LENS FV 5 (EXAMPLE ORDER) ORDER: WLS 1000 MH FG MT BRZ NO 1- Tri -Tap not available in 1000 Watt PSMH Voltage must be specified -120V, 277V m 347V. 2- For international voltages, consultfanory. 3- MT- Multi Tap is shipped standard unless otherwise specified. Multi Tap consists of 120V, 208p 2401,, and 277V. Multi Tap is pre wired for highest voltage. Alternate voltages wil I require field re- wiring. 4- Tri -Tap is shipped standard for Canadian applications. Tri -Tap consists of 720V 27N and 347V. Tri -Tap is pre-wired for highest voltage. Alternate voltages will require field re- wiring. 5- An 8" bracket can only be ordered with single and DI 80' configurations. 6 On FVR photoelectric control can only be used with 400 Wan PSMH In accordance with the 2007 Energy Independance and Security An (EISA), fixtures will no longer be avaiable in Probe Start Metal Halide With wattages from 150 watts through 500 watts for new installations. Replacement parts for exbitng fixtures are still available. Color Decals I'1 ERIN G INFORMATION APPROPRIATE .1 CHOICE COLUMN 1 FORM U LATE ORDER CODE. LAMP LIGHT LINE LUMINAIRE LUMINAIRE DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE SOURCE LENS VOLTAGE' FINISH OPTIONS FVM 2 -Type 11 250W PSMH - Pulse -Stan FG -Flat Glass 480V BRZ - Bronze LL 3 - Type III 320W Metal Halide MT - Multi Tap 3 BLK - Black -Less Lamp FP- Perimeter 35OW HPS- High Pressure Forward Sodium TT -Tri Tap ' ^ PLT - Platinum GS -Glare (PSMH only) Throw 40OW WHT - White Shield 5 - Type V MSV - Metallic 8BK - 8" Bracket s Silver RPP -Round CC - Custom 250W NW- Natural White Color Pole Plate 320W BKT -WM -Wall 35OW 40OW Mount Plate SF - Single FVR 2 -Type If 40OW MHR - Metal Halide 3 -Type 111 575W Reduced Fusing FP- Perimeter (PSMH only) Envelope DF - Double Forward 750W 1000 Watt Throw (PSMH only) PSMH -Pulse -Start Fusing 5 -Type V 87507 Metal Halide AS - Accent AF- Automotive (PSMH only) 1000W HPS High Pressure Striping Forward (not available Sodium PC - Photo Cell Throw in HPS)' NO - No Options AI- Automotive 775W NW - Natural White Interior SR - Super Reflector 575W FV 5 (EXAMPLE ORDER) ORDER: WLS 1000 MH FG MT BRZ NO 1- Tri -Tap not available in 1000 Watt PSMH Voltage must be specified -120V, 277V m 347V. 2- For international voltages, consultfanory. 3- MT- Multi Tap is shipped standard unless otherwise specified. Multi Tap consists of 120V, 208p 2401,, and 277V. Multi Tap is pre wired for highest voltage. Alternate voltages wil I require field re- wiring. 4- Tri -Tap is shipped standard for Canadian applications. Tri -Tap consists of 720V 27N and 347V. Tri -Tap is pre-wired for highest voltage. Alternate voltages will require field re- wiring. 5- An 8" bracket can only be ordered with single and DI 80' configurations. 6 On FVR photoelectric control can only be used with 400 Wan PSMH In accordance with the 2007 Energy Independance and Security An (EISA), fixtures will no longer be avaiable in Probe Start Metal Halide With wattages from 150 watts through 500 watts for new installations. Replacement parts for exbitng fixtures are still available. Color Decals 45- Light Gold Metallic 55 -Black 20- Charcoal Metallic 50 -White 94- Blue Metallic 51 - Dark Red 59 -Dark Green 700 - Aztec Silver Metallic 21 - Tomato Red ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION (Accessories are field installed) Description HOUSE SIDE SHIELD FVR/FVM 2 HSS - House Side Shield FVR/FVM 3 HSS - House Side Shield 4 -5/16' — 5 -3/8° FVR /FVM FP HSS- House Side Shield (11 orrim (137mm) 1.-2 -5/76' FVR/FVRPT FA/AFT HSS -House Side Shield 118 -7/B" (59mm) (225mm) TYPEII TYPE III AND FORWARD THROW IFA(FPIAM Approved By: Location: 1919 Windsor Place Fort Worth, TX 76110 Specifications subject to change without notice. Project Name: Date: 800.633.8711 Fax: 817.735.4824 WLS LIGHTING SYSTEMS www.wlslighting.com • Consider thelmpact! m Ree2715 REVISIONS BY: U b, 1, Act., I A& e La 2.$ 1.7 IT 5.2 V4 1.R 1,0 J.o 1.2 b 1.c I., T., x.e Ss 14 t, b� -At 'I 1., Fn 5, 4 t b b., J, I.e i b b.e 1., 1.. 1.2 1 .7 n Le TA 1: I., I., D. b, la 1. I A ts., 91 C�.IA 3 Orr- I., SAI ........... . . N .... . ...... ...... . ,MUMAZ .. 1­1 01111­0 Mll M1011 ­VNM 111- M M—TObl- A— MIMA-111 01 AlY 4t JrPPY NARTIIN(,' AT)n/T/nA/ Q� L lr Q) Z wo 0-1 za. za. 7: L (L .i I B I I I LO vi O O I o M Z 10 z 0 W J J INI W , ; w Z Ll W IL EO Z 0 13 Ilrnl A WSB a,asmc Infrastructure . Engineering . Planning a Construction March 30, 2016 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Aspen Dental — Preliminary Plan Review Lot 1, Block 1 Jerry Hartung Addition City Project No. ZASPEN WSB Project No. 02596 -210 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 We have reviewed the project preliminary civil plans received on March 7, 2016, as prepared by Loucks, Inc., and the Alta survey as prepared by Lot Surveys, and offer the following comments. 1. Confirm that conditions have been met per previous plat approval by MnDOT for the site. 2. Any work within MnDOT right of way will require obtaining a right of way permit from them. 3. It is assumed that the existing catch basins and storm sewer on the site and the adjacent site were designed to accommodate runoff from the site based on a 10 -year rainfall event. Provide proposed catch basin inlet capacity calculations. Catch basins should be designed with sufficient capacity to limit ponding to maximum depth of 0.3 feet for a 10- year rainfall event. 4. The storm sewer system along Cedar Street and TH 25 was designed to accommodate runoff from the site for a 10 -year event. The downstream regional ponding was designed to provide storm water management, including rate control, water quality and infiltration for the site. 5. Identify all emergency overflow routes and elevations for each catch basin on the grading plan. The EOF should be a minimum of 1.5' below the low building opening. 6. Provide the location of roof drain outlet locations or connections to the storm sewer. 7. Show the irrigation layout on the construction plans. K'O })pyllO.lAminibax�GlRa eMwnwrn -Aeyen /knmf W)0 /M1Jx Ms. Angela Schumann March 30, 2016 Page 2 8. There is an additional sanitary sewer service manhole south of what is shown on the plans that serves the Buffalo Wild Wings site- see attached utility as- built. The watermain service stub is located in close proximity to this manhole. 9. The existing water service stub is 8 -inch per City as- builts, not 6 -inch as noted on the plans. 10. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction. 11. Proposed invert elevations should be noted where the water and sewer services cross. 12. The proposed water service shall be installed with a minimum 7.5 feet of cover. 13. The plans should reference compliance with the City of Monticello General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction. 14. Applicable City standard detail plates should be included in the plans. 15. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. 16. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. 17. The plans need to be signed by a licensed professional engineer Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Final plans will need to be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to building permit approval. Please give me a call at 763 - 271 -3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb x: in:rw.rroueaw�.0 rxd „a„,„,,,,,.ey., ex�wr wranau City Council Agenda: 4/25/16 2J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -022 authorizing application for the MnDOT Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: MnDOT has developed a new program called the Greater Minnesota Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program for funding construction of noise walls for residential dwellings built prior to 1997. The program is designed for cities adjacent to limited access freeways, expressways or interstates where noise levels are greater than the state daytime noise standard as defined by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The program is specifically designed for locations outside of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area with 172 cities being eligible, of which 44 are located in Central Minnesota. MnDOT has committed $700,000 for the 2016 program. Staff reviewed potential locations along the I -94 corridor that would meet the program criteria. The Balboul neighborhood fronting the north side of I -94, south of Prairie Road between Hedman Lane, Balboul Circle and Marvin Elwood Road appears to be the only area within the City that meets the criteria for the program, given the development year, noise levels and cost/benefit threshold requirements of the program. The proposed noise wall location can be found in the enclosed map. It should be noted that the River Mill/Mill Run neighborhood was developed after 1997 and would not be eligible for the program. In 1997, there was a legislative directive for MnDOT to develop a noise abatement policy (Statute 161.125) and this was determined to be the effective date for the policy and for the subject program. Additional information on the Greater Minnesota Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program is included below. Overview • Total funding of $700,000 for the 2016 program • For projects in municipalities outside the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area • Program will run in future years with uncertain funding amounts • MnDOT pays 90% of cost if selected, City must match 10% of project cost • MnDOT completes noise analysis, design, contract administration and maintenance of the noise barrier Eligibility: • Must be within incorporated area • Location must be adjacent to limited access Freeway, Expressway or Interstate • Currently must exceed MN state noise daytime standard • Adjacent homes must be constructed prior to 1997 • Noise wall must be able to be built on existing right -of -way City Council Agenda: 4/25/16 • Must not be adjacent to a future project in 10 -year plan which would require noise analysis Selection: • MnDOT will conduct noise analysis and verify all eligibility requirements are met • Projects are ranked based on cost effectiveness to benefit location o Maximum value of $43,500/benefited location to qualify • Availability of funds will be used to select projects Schedule: • April 25, 2016 — City Council resolution authorizing application • May 9, 2016 — Application Due • June 2016 — MnDOT selects projects • 2016 — MnDOT starts design of project • 2017- 2019 — Begin Construction, depending on when design is complete Link: http: / /www.dot. state.mn.us /environment /noise /greater- mn- program.html Al. Budget impact: The proposed noise barrier would be approximately 1,650 feet long which would cost approximately $660,000 based on the cost estimate calculation provided in the application. The City's responsibility is anticipated to be approximately $66,000. If the application is selected and the Council approves to accept the award, funds could be budgeted in years 2017 -2019 for the project. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time was spent to complete the application. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 -022 authorizing submittal of a Greater Minnesota Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program grant application. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2016 -022 at this time. This option should be selected if Council prefers to take a wait and see approach in anticipation of a freeway noise barrier installation which would be funded completely by the State when and if six lanes are constructed west of Highway 25. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving Alternative #1. This program appears to be very competitive with 172 cities eligible for the funding. It is unknown how many applications MnDOT will receive, given this is the first year of the program, and how the City's application will compare. City Council Agenda: 4/25/16 The Balboul neighborhood appears to be the only area within the I -94 corridor that meets the program criteria. The program criteria identifies that the noise barrier must not be adjacent to a future project in 10 -year plan which would require noise analysis. The potential expansion of I- 94 from Albertville to St. Cloud is currently not in MnDOT's 10 -year plan, however the I -94 Coalition continues to lobby for this. If the expansion project moves forward, a noise analysis would be completed and if a noise barrier is constructed, it is assumed to be at no cost to the City. This process is similar to the wall construction adjacent to the Bluff's apartment complex completed in 2014. The City could wait until 1 -94 is expanded, however currently there is not a reasonable timeline established for when and if the expansion would occur. MnDOT has indicated that their traffic modeling does not support an expansion project from Monticello to St. Cloud in the near future so there is a chance that momentum for adding a lane from Monticello to St Cloud could get stalled. The application was very simple to complete and staff's thought was that if the project was awarded the grant funds, the City share of approximately $66,000 would be reasonable given the potential noise mitigation benefit to the neighborhood. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2016 -022 • MnDOT Greater MN Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program Overview • MnDOT Greater MN Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program Application and Map RESOLUTION 2016 -022 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FROM THE CITY OF MONTICELLO FOR AN APPLICATION FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREATER MN STAND -ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Greater MN Stand -Alone Noise barrier program was recommended by the Office of the Legislative Auditor for its ability to create a pathway for communities outside of the metropolitan area to become eligible for state - funded noise barrier projects; and WHEREAS, the program will be awarding roughly $700,000 in 2016 for building noise barriers; and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello supports the important public need to keep certain lands impacted by traffic noise quiet and preserved; and WHEREAS, if the City of Monticello is awarded funds for the program and accepts the award, the City of Monticello will commit the required local financial match of 10% of the project cost; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, City of Monticello hereby supports the submission of the application and for the MnDOT Greater MN Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 25th day of April, 2016. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the Monticello City Council at their scheduled meeting on April 25, 2016, and recorded in minutes of said meeting. Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Notary Public: Date: (STAMP) 2 MnDOT GREATER MN STAND -ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM �O��NNESp�g20 OF T 0 FtiT yQ R P� 8 March 2016 MINNESOTA'S EXPERIENCE WITH HIGHWAY NOISE MITIGATION The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has been constructing noise walls and barriers during roadway construction projects since the mid- 1970's. In 1974, the MN State Legislature directed the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to adopt state noise standards (M.S. 116.07, Subdivision 2). Federal noise standards specific to highway traffic noise are codified in 23 CFR 772. Both standards are used to determine noise impacts and mitigation in Minnesota. In 1995, the MN State Legislature directed MnDOT (MN Statute 161.125 Sound abatement along highways) to develop a statewide priority list to direct state resources to mitigate traffic noise for locations not adjacent to new roadway construction, when mitigation may be required by federal law. To date, only the Metro District has funded stand -alone noise "retrofit" barriers. In October 2013, the Office of the Legislative Auditor released the evaluation report: MnDOT Noise Barriers'. The report recommended that "MnDOT should create a pathway for communities outside of the metropolitan area to become eligible for state - funded noise barrier projects." This document outlines the MnDOT process for stand -alone noise barriers in greater Minnesota. NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) noise abatement criteria (NAC) differ by the type of land use, apply to all hours of the day and night, and identify where noise abatement should be considered. FHWA NAC for hourly L10 is used in MN. L10 is the level which may not be exceeded for more than 10 % of the time (6 min /hr). Minnesota state standards are maximum outdoor hourly noise levels for various land -use activities based on hourly L10 and L50 noise descriptors. E.g., L50 is the level that may not be exceeded more than 50 % of the time (30 min /hr). Minnesota's standards have different levels for daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and nighttime (10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.). 1 The full audit report is available at http: / /www.auditor.leg. state .mn.us /ped /2013 /mndotnoise.htm FHWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA Activity Activity Evaluation Category Criteria (1,2) Location Activity Description Land Use L10 dBA L10 1-50 L10 L50 Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance and serve and A 60 Exterior important public need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if 55 50 Commercial the area is to continue to serve its intended purpose. 13(3) 70 Exterior Residential Industrial NAC -3 80 Active sport areas, amphitheaters, auditoriums, campgrounds, cemeteries, day 80 75 Notes care centers, hospitals, libraries, medical facilities, parks, picnic areas, places of C(3) 70 Exterior worship, playgrounds, public meeting rooms, public or nonprofit institutional 4. From Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minn. Rules sec. 7030.0040 structures, radio studios, recording studios, recreation areas, Section 4(f) sites, schools, television studios, trails, and trail crossings Auditoriums, day care centers, hospitals, libraries, medical facilities, places of D 55 Interior worship, public meeting rooms, public or nonprofit institutional structures, radio studios, recording studios, schools, and television studios E(3) 75 Exterior Hotels, motels, offices, restaurants /bars, and other developed lands, properties or activities not included in A -D or F Agriculture, airports, bus yards, emergency services, industrial, logging, F -- - maintenance facilities, manufacturing, mining, rail yards, retail facilities, shipyards, utilities (water resources water treatment, electrical), and warehousing G - - Undeveloped lands that are not permitted 1 1-10 shall be used for impact assessment Z The 1-10 Activity Criteria values are for impact determination only, and are not design standards for noise abatement measures. 3 Includes undeveloped lands permitted for this activity category. MINNESOTA STATE NOISE STANDARDS FEASIBLE NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES Earthen berms and noise walls, or a combination of the two, are eligible to use as mitigation through this program. Earth berms can be very cost effective but are less common because sufficient land is not commonly available. Noise walls are normally the most cost effective and constructible form of noise mitigation. However, even noise walls are not effective in all cases because of limitations on controlled highway access and right -of -way. Exterior Hourly Noise Level Limit, dBA NAC: Noise Area Daytime 7:00 am to 10:00 pm Nighttime 10:00 pm to 7:00 am Land Use Classification L10 1-50 L10 L50 Residential NAC -1 65 60 55 50 Commercial NAC -2 70 65 70 65 Industrial NAC -3 80 75 80 75 Notes 1. NAC -1 includes household units, transient lodging and hotels, educational, religious, cultural entertainment, camping and picnicking land uses 2. NAC -2 includes retail and restaurants, transportation terminals, professional offices, parks, recreational and amusement land uses. 3. NAC -3 includes industrial, manufacturing, transportation facilities (except terminals), and utilities land uses 4. From Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minn. Rules sec. 7030.0040 FEASIBLE NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES Earthen berms and noise walls, or a combination of the two, are eligible to use as mitigation through this program. Earth berms can be very cost effective but are less common because sufficient land is not commonly available. Noise walls are normally the most cost effective and constructible form of noise mitigation. However, even noise walls are not effective in all cases because of limitations on controlled highway access and right -of -way. Application for Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Mitigation 1. Name of governmental authority making application and agreeing to 10% cost share: 2. Interstate /Freeway adjacent to area for which application is being made: 3. Limits of area of application: a map is required; aerial photo is preferred: Side of Freeways: (N, S, E, W, Both) Beginning Point: (Cross roads, etc.) Ending Point: Estimated length of proposed noise barrier (in feet) 4. Are the residential units located in an incorporated area? Note: Only incorporate areas are eligible. 5. Were the majority of the residential units constructed prior to 1997? Note: Only residential areas constructed prior to 1997 are eligible. 6. Number of residential units (homes and /or apartment buildings) adjacent to the highway /freeway: 7. Existing noise level (use IVInDOT's Flat Earth Noise Level Estimating Spreadsheet: available at: www. dot .state.mn.us /environment /noise/ 8. 1 certify that all the above information is correct. Print name and title of local official Yes /No Yes /No Date Signature and title of local official Date 3 INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING APPLICATION FOR STAND -ALONE NOISE BARRIER MITIGATION 1. Name of governmental authority making application and agreeing to 10% cost share: Name of the township, city, county, etc. applying for a noise mitigation project and accountable for 10 % of total cost of the project. For estimating noise wall costs, use $20/ ftz (MnDOT standard concrete post/ wooden plank noise wall). Example: length of barrier x 20 foot height x $20 2. Interstate /Freeway adjacent to area for which application is being made: Identification number for the Interstate or limited access freeway thought to be the source of the noise. Per Statute 161.125, stand -alone noise barrier mitigation is available only for limited access freeways or expressways. Note: gaps from driveways, etc., reduce the effectiveness of the noise barriers. 3. Limits of area of application on a map (required) or aerial photo (preferred): Side of Freeway: The side of the freeway along which the noise mitigation is desired. If there are eligible residents on both sides of the freeway, enter `Both." Beginning Point: A landmark or feature, such as a cross road, distinguishing the beginning point of the area to be mitigated by the potential noise barrier. Mile or reference point is preferred. Ending Point: See Beginning Point above. Estimated length of proposed noise barrier (in feet). The estimated length of the proposed noise barrier in feet. 4. Are the residential units in an incorporated area? Confirm that the residential units are within the official city limits with a governmental authority. Per MN Statute 161.125, stand -alone noise barrier mitigation is available in incorporated areas. 5. Were the majority of the residential units built prior to 1997? This is a confirmation of the number and location of the dwelling units which were constructed prior to 1997 as documented in County records. MnDOT requires dwelling units to be constructed prior to 1997 as MN Statue 161.125 was passed in 1997. 6. Number of residential units adjacent to the highway /freeway: This is the number of dwelling units immediately adjacent to the freeway; no intervening structures. 7. Existing noise levels: Existing noise levels must exceed MN State Daytime Standard of 65.0 dBA Lio Use MnDOT's Flat Earth Noise Level estimating spreadsheet available at www. dot .state.mn.us /environment /noise. 8. Signature and Title of local official and Date: Signature and title of the official validating that the included information is accurate and the funding resolution and the mandatory zoning and building regulations are approved. Include copies of official approval documents (city council resolution required). 5 Stand -alone Barrier Project Procedures and Rules 1. Applications will be accepted annually from October VY through December 31St 2. Applications not selected will need to resubmit to be considered again for future years. 3. The proposed area must not be adjacent to a future expansion /reconstruction project which would require a noise analysis identified in the 10 year work plan. 4. Existing noise levels must exceed Minnesota State Daytime Standard of 65.0 dBA L10 5. For screening, the applicant can compute this cost by taking the assumed barrier cost (length x 20 feet in height x $20/ sq. ft.) and then dividing that number by the number of homes and /or apartment buildings adjacent to the barrier. MnDOT uses a maximum cost effectiveness value of $43,500 /benefited location. 6. MnDOT will verify the area to decide the number of eligible dwelling units and ##e approximate the cost of noise abatement. MnDOT will release results of all noise surveys to the applicants. 7. MnDOT will create an eligibility list ranked using the formula below. The formula considers both the cost effectives of the barrier and the intensity of the noise. L10 noise level — 65 Cost effectiveness /(2 ^( )) 10 8. MnDOT will propose noise mitigation projects for the highest priority locations from the eligibility list, within the given funding limitation. Final eligibility will be confirmed upon MnDOT completion of a final noise analysis. 9. Projects would typically be constructed wears out from the time of selection. 10. All noise mitigation will be designed by MnDOT following MnDOT design specifications. 11. MnDOT will maintain the structural soundness of the noise mitigation structure and will be accountable for the aesthetic quality of the structure on the freeway facing side only. The local governmental authority is required to maintain the resident side of the barrier. 12. If the project meets MnDOrs Noise Policy standards for a stand -alone noise barrier, then local authorities must agree to administer 10% of the total cost of the construction (as noted in the agreement and council resolution). Failure to comply with all of the above specifications will make the noise mitigation project ineligible for MnDOT funding ( "unreasonable "). N Definitions The following definitions are set forth in MnDOT Noise Policy. (See www. dot. state.mn.us / environment / noise /pdf /guidance /noise- glossary.pdf) Benefited Receptor: The receptor of an abatement measure that receives a noise reduction at or above the minimum threshold of 5 dBA. Existing Noise Level: The worst noise hour resulting from the combination of natural and mechanical sources and human activity usually present in a particular area. Impacted Receptor: A receptor that has a traffic noise impact (see definition for traffic noise impacts). 1_10: The sound level that is exceeded 10 % of the time (the 90th %) for the period under consideration. 1-10 (h) is the hourly value of Lio• L50: The sound level that is exceeded 50 % of the time (the 50th %) for the period under consideration. L50 (h) is the hourly value of L50- Leq: The equivalent steady -state sound level which in a stated period of time contains the same acoustic energy as the time - varying sound level during the same time period, with Leq(h) being the hourly value of Leq. Multifamily Dwelling: A residential structure containing more than one residence. Each residence in a multifamily dwelling shall be counted as one receptor when determining impacted and benefited receptors. Noise Area Classification (State): The Noise Area Classification as identified in Section 4, Table 2, are groupings of land use activities established in the State Noise Rules. Noise Barrier: A physical obstruction that is constructed between the highway noise source and the noise sensitive receptor(s) that lowers the noise level, including stand -alone noise walls, noise berms (earth or other material), and combination berm /wall systems. Noise Level (A- weighted): The sound pressure level obtained through use of A- weighting characteristics. The unit of measure is the decibel (dB), commonly referred to as dBA when A- weighting is used. Noise Reduction Design Goal: The desired dBA noise reduction determined from calculating the difference between future build noise levels with abatement, to future build noise levels without abatement. The noise reduction design goal is 7 dBA (must be achieved at a minimum of one receptor for each proposed barrier to achieve reasonableness). Noise Sensitive Area: A geographic area containing a collection of noise sensitive receptors that might be protected behind a single noise barrier, such as a continuous neighborhood of homes abutting one side of the highway between two interchanges. Owner: An individual or entity that is named on the deed of a benefited receptor as an owner, or listed as the owner on tax rolls. Owner /Resident: An individual or entity that is named on the deed of a benefited receptor as an owner, and resides in that same benefitted receptor. Reasonableness: The combination of social, economic, and environmental factors considered in the evaluation of a noise abatement measure. MnDOT uses a maximum value of $43,500 /Benefited location. Receptor: An outdoor place where frequent human use occurs and a lowered noise level may be of benefit. Residence: The official location of a household or dwelling unit. Either a single family residence or each dwelling unit in a multifamily dwelling. Resident: An individual or entity that resides in or utilizes a benefited receptor via contract (i.e. a legal renter of a benefited residence). This includes a legal renter when a commercial establishment has been determined to be a benefited receptor. Traffic Noise Impacts Design year build condition noise levels that approach or exceed the FHWA, or exceed State Noise Standards for the design year build condition; or design year build condition noise levels that create a substantial noise increase over existing noise levels. Application for Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Mitigation 1. Name of governmental authority making application and agreeing to 10% cost share: City of Monticello 2. Interstate /Freeway adjacent to area for which application is being made: Interstate 94 3. Limits of area of application: a map is required; aerial photo is preferred: Side of Freeways (N, S, E, W, Both) Beginning Point: (Cross roads, etc.) Ending Point: North Near Nicholas Circle (approximately RP 191 +00.341) Near Marvin Elwood Road (approximately RP 191 +00.653) Estimated length of proposed noise barrier (in feet) 4. Are the residential units located in an incorporated area? Note: Only incorporate areas are eligible. 5. Were the majority of the residential units constructed prior to 1997? Note: Only residential areas constructed prior to 1997 are eligible. 1650 [ft] 6. Number of residential units (homes and /or apartment buildings) adjacent to the highway /freeway: 7. Existing noise level (use MnDOT's Flat Earth Noise Level Estimating Spreadsheet: available at: www. dot .state.mn.us /environment /noise/ 8. 1 certify that all the above information is correct. Print name and title of local official es No es No 17 Llo =73.2 Date Signature and title of local official Date Flat Earth Noise Level Estimate This describes the method used for determining average hourly volumes used in the flat earth noise level estimate. All hourly volume reports were calculated from dividing the AADT and HCAADT by 24 hours. The ratio of medium trucks and heavy tracks was assumed to be 90% medium trucks and 10% heavy trucks. This ratio was the ratio of medium to heavy trucks which is the default values in the spreadsheet. The hourly volumes used are shown below. All vehicle speeds were assumed to be at the posted speed limit. Flat Earth Noise Level Estimating Tool Roadway 1 Roadway 2 Enter hourly Cars 1513 Enter hour) Cars 0 Enter hourly Medium Trucks 300 Enter hourly Medium Trucks 0 Enterspeed of Heavy Trucks 35 Enterspeed of Heavy Trucks 0 Enterspeed of Cars MPH 70 Enterspeed of Cars MPH 70 Enterspeed of Medium Trucks 70 Enter speed of Medium Trucks 70 Enterspeed of Heavy Trucks 70 Enterspeed of Heavy Trucks 70 Enter distance to Roadway 1 160 Enter distance to Roadway 2 280 Code ground cover H for hard. S for soft S Result L10 73.2 L50 68.8 Cost of Project $660,000 17 locations _ $38,825. The cost of the sound barrier is estimated at $20. per square foot, with the wall estimated to be 1650[ft] long and 20 feet high the price would be $660,000. 1650 [f t] * 20[ft height] * $20./ft2 = $660,000. At 10% local match, City of Monticello would be responsible for $66,000. Cost effectiveness With 17 structures directly impacted by the noise wall, the cost per benefit location is below the MnDOT requirement of $43,500 per benefit location for each benefit location The cost of the sound barrier is estimated at $20. per square foot, with the wall estimated to be 1650[ft] long and 20 feet high the price would be $660,000. 1650 [f t] * 20[ft height] * $20./ft2 = $660,000. At 10% local match, City of Monticello would be responsible for $66,000. Cost effectiveness With 17 structures directly impacted by the noise wall, the cost per benefit location is below the MnDOT requirement of $43,500 per benefit location for each benefit location Figure 1: Proposed Noise Barrier AprR13,2ol6 CITY OF Monticello City Boundary 1 inch = 376 feet — Proposed Sound Barrier Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES /Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Bryan Pittman Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 2K. Consideration to adopt Resolution #2016 -023 to Advance Municipal State Aid funds for the 2016 Street Reconstruction Proiect, City Project No. 15CO01 and the TH 25/7th Street Proiect, City Proiect No. 15CO04 (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City has the option of requesting advance municipal state aid funding for the construction of the 2016 Street Reconstruction project and the TH 25/7th Street intersection project. Both of these projects are eligible for State Aid funding, however the eligible amount exceeds the City's current State Aid balance. Cities are able to advance or "borrow" funds and are allowed to advance up to five times their annual construction allotment from the City's state aid account. The City's current State Aid balance is $395,694.00. This is the also the same amount identified for the City's 2016 annual construction allotment. The estimated eligible state aid funding amount for the 2016 Street Reconstruction project is $825,000 and $1,050,000 for the TH 25/7th Street intersection project, totaling $1,875,000. Taking this amount less the current state aid balance of $395,694, leaves the requested advance amount of $1,479,306. After the projects are bid and awarded, the City can request up to 95% of the eligible state aid amount based on the bid amount. The funds are released from State Aid on a first- come- first- serve basis. MnDOT's finance department has indicated that they anticipate there will be funds available to accept the City's advance request, as has been the case in years past. The City is already on the initial list of projects to receive advance funds for 2016. This information was submitted to MnDOT in November of 2015 for the subject projects. The next step in the process is to approve the advance request resolution in order to keep the process moving forward. Al. Budget Impact: The 2016 Street Reconstruction project and the TH 25 /7th Street intersection project have been identified as being funded using street reconstruction and improvement bonds, capital improvement funds, utility enterprise funds, advancement of state aid funds and special assessments to benefitting properties. A2. Staff Workload Impact: WSB and the City's finance department will administer the pay request process. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 -023 to Advance Municipal State Aid funds for the 2016 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 15CO01 and the TH 25 /7th Street Project, City Project No. 15C004. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2016 -023 at this time. City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1 as the advancement of state aid funds has been the recommendation and plan throughout the project process. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2016 -023 2 RESOLUTION 2016 -023 RESOLUTION REQUESTING STATE OF MINNESOTA TO ADVANCE MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS FOR CITY OF MONTICELLO WHEREAS, the Municipality of Monticello is planning to implement Municipal State Aid Street Project(s) in 2016 which will require State Aid funds in excess of those available in its State Aid Construction Account, and WHEREAS, said municipality is prepared to proceed with the construction of said project(s) through the use of an advance from the Municipal State Aid Street Fund to supplement the available funds in their State Aid Construction Account, and WHEREAS, the advance is based on the following determination of estimated expenditures: Account Balance as of date 3/31/16 $395,694 Less estimated disbursements: Project # 222 - 010 -005, 222 - 101 -008 $1,050,000 Project # 222 - 113 - 002,222- 119 - 001,222- 120 -001 $825,000 Total Estimated Disbursements $1,875,000 Advance Amount (amount in excess of acct balance) $1,479,306 WHEREAS, repayment of the funds so advanced will be made in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 162.14, Subd. 6 and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8820.1500, Subp. 10b, and WHEREAS, the Municipality acknowledges advance funds are released on a first- come -first- serve basis and this resolution does not guarantee the availability of funds. NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved: That the Commissioner of Transportation be and is hereby requested to approve this advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid Street Project(s) of the Municipality of Monticello in an amount up to $1,479,306. I hereby authorize repayments from subsequent accruals to the Municipal State Aid Street Construction Account of said Municipality from future year allocations until fully repaid. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Municipality of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota, at a duly authorized Municipal Council Meeting held in the Municipality of Monticello, Minnesota on the 25th day of April, 2016, as disclosed by the records of said Municipality on file and of record in the office. City of Monticello City Clerk 3A. A. City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 Public Hearing- Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -024 accepting the Part 2 amendment to the Wellhead Protection Plan (WSB) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On July 13, 2015, the City Council authorized WSB & Associates to prepare the Monticello Wellhead Protection Plan (WHPP), Part 2 Amendment, as mandated by the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). The goal of the WHPP is to prevent human - caused contaminants from entering the water supply wells and to protect all who use the water supply from adverse health effects associated with groundwater contamination The Council had authorized the completion of Part 1 previously. A public meeting was held on April 27, 2015 to discuss the findings and Part 1 report. Part 1 consisted of the following: 1) Delineations of the Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPA). 2) Delineation of a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). 3) Assessments of well and aquifer vulnerability related to these areas for the primary water supply wells used by Monticello. Part 2 of a WHPP describes how the results of the Part 1 Plan can be applied to best protect a community's water supply. The Part 1 Plan defined the area needed to be protected, while Part 2 provides the action plan to do so. In general, Part 2 consists of the following: An inventory of the pertinent potential contaminant sources (including wells and tanks) within the approved Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). Matt Theisen, Water and Sewer Superintendent's historical knowledge of the City provided valuable information in order to complete this inventory. • Provides the City with a management plan to address potential contaminant sources and associated reporting requirements. Provides the City with Plan of Action that is feasible, and not merely the completion of a mandated task. The action plan includes tasks to be completed by the City for the following categories: a) Well Management b) Public Education c) Storage Tank Management d) Data Collection e) Water Conservation f) Land Use Management g) Planning and Zoning City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 h) Implementation i) Evaluation It should be noted that, Chapter 3, Section 3.7 Overlay Zoning Districts, Subsection (H) DW: Drinking Water Supply Management Area will be updated to reference the most current Wellhead Protection Plan when other zoning ordinance updates occur. This would be a housekeeping item and current the section has been left blank. Upon Council resolution to accept the plan, the final plan will be submitted to the MDH by May 31, 2016 and is anticipated to be approved by the MDHfollowing their 90 day review. After approval, the plan is valid for 10 years or 2026, at which point another amendment may be mandated by the MDH. Al. Budget Impact: Funds were budgeted in 2015 and 2016 to complete the plan. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Various staff will be involved with implementing the action plan tasks as identified in the Part 2 Plan over the next 10 years. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 -024 accepting Part 2 of the City of Monticello Wellhead Protection Plan for Submission to the Minnesota Department of Health 2. Motion to deny Resolution 2016 -024 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. The Part 2 amendment is mandated by the MDH and must be submitted to them by May 31, 2016. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Draft Resolution 2016 -024 • Draft Wellhead Protection Plan — Part II 2 RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PART 2 OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN FOR SUBMISSION TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has completed developing its Wellhead Protection Plans pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Rules 4720.5100 to 4720.5590; and WHEREAS, the goal of the Wellhead Protection Plan is to prevent human - caused contaminants from entering the water supply wells and to protect all who use the water supply from adverse health effects associated with groundwater contamination; and WHEREAS, Part 1 of the Wellhead Protection Plan is a technical exercise that uses groundwater modeling to delineate the wellhead protection area (WHPA), Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) and includes a well and aquifer vulnerability assessment; and WHEREAS, Part 1 was approved by the Minnesota Department of Health on March 9, 2015; and WHEREAS, a Public Information Meeting was held, as required by Minnesota Rules (part 4720.5330, subpart 7) on April 27, 2015, for the review of Part 1; and WHEREAS, Part 2 of the Wellhead Protection Plan describes how the results of the Part 1 can be applied to best protect a community's water supply, through the evaluation of several data elements, including physical environment, land use, public utilities, water quantity, water quality, an inventory of potential contaminants, and the preparation of a management portion of the plan; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held, as required by Minnesota Rules (part 4720.5350, subpart 4) on April 25, 2016 for review of Part 2 prior to submittal to the Minnesota Department of Health for approval. NOW THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello that Part 2 of the Wellhead Protection Plan is accepted for submittal to the Minnesota Department of Health for approval. This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello on the 25th day of April, 2016, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk (seal) CITY OF Monticello City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street • Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295 -2711 WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN ........................... Part 2 ............................ - 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 �+p Minneapolis, MN 55416 Wa70 Tel: (763) 541 -4800 • Fax: (763) 541 -1700 wsbeng.com Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review Wellhead Protection Plan Part 2 City of Monticello, Minnesota Table of Contents PublicWater Supply Profile ............................................................................................ ..............................3 PublicWater Supply Wells .............................................................................................. ..............................4 Potential Contaminant Source Inventory DocumentationList ......................................................................................................... ..............................5 Public Wells ExecutiveSummary ......................................................................................................... ..............................7 Private Wells in DWSMA ChapterOne .................................................................................................................... ..............................9 Sealed Wells in DWSMA Data Elements and Assessment (4720.5200) ........................................................... ............................... 9 ChapterTwo ................................................................................................................... .............................16 Remaining Unlocated Wells Impact of Changes on Public Water Supply Wells ( 4720. 5220) ............................... .............................16 Sanitary Sewer System ChapterThree ................................................................................................................ .............................19 Public Water Supply System Issues, Problems, and Opportunities (4720.5230) ................................................... .............................19 Potential Contaminant Source Inventory ChapterFour .................................................................................................................. .............................22 Wells Wellhead Protection Goals ( 4720. 5240) ................................................................... .............................22 ChapterFive ................................................................................................................... .............................23 Objectives and Plans of Action ( 4720. 5250) ........................................................... ............................... 23 ChapterSix ................................................................................................................... ............................... 35 Evaluation Program (4720.5270) ............................................................................ ............................... 35 ChapterSeven ................................................................................................................ .............................36 Alternative Water Supply Contingency Strategy ( 4720. 5280) ............................... ............................... 36 Appendix A — Tables Table 1: Potential Contaminant Source Inventory Table 2a: Public Wells Table 2b: Private Wells in DWSMA Table 3: Sealed Wells in DWSMA Table 4: Previously Unlocated Wells Table 5: Remaining Unlocated Wells Appendix B — Figures Figure 1: DWSMA Location and Vulnerability Figure 2: Floodplain Figure 3: Parcels Figure 4: Existing Land Use Figure 5: Current Zoning Map Figure 6: Storm Sewer System Figure 7: Sanitary Sewer System Figure 8: Public Water Supply System Figure 9: Potential Contaminant Source Inventory Figure 10: Wells City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 1 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 Appendix C- Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 Appendix D- Inner Wellhead Management Zone Surveys Appendix E- Consumer Confidence Report (2015) t. LGU Review City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 2 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY PROFILE PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 53362 Phone: 763 - 295 -2711 Fax: 763 - 295 -4404 WELLHEAD PROTECTION MANAGER Matt Theisen Water Superintendent City of Monticello 909 Golf Course Road Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: 763 - 271 -3274 E -Mail: Matt.Theisen @ci.monticello.rr CONSULTANT/TECHNICAL ASSISTAN Anneka Munsell, PE WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 Phone: 763 - 2270 -3478 E -Mail: amunsell @wsbeng.com Breanne Rothstein, Planner WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Ave. S, Suite 300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 Phone: 763 - 231 -4863 E -Mail: brothstein @wsbeng.com GENERAL INFORMATION Unique Well Number(s): 218032, 236578, 439866, 449182, and 694202 Size of Population Served by Municipal Water: 13,000 County: Wright LGU Review City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 3 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WELLS LGU Review Local Well Unique Casing Depth Date Name Number Aquifer (ft) Well Depth (ft) Constructed Quaternary Well No. 1 218032 240 260 1964 Buried Artesian Quaternary Well No. 2 236578 226 250 1970 Buried Artesian Well No. 3 439866 Mt. Simon 224 310 1988 Quaternary Well No. 4 449182 176 220 1988 Buried Artesian Quaternary Well No. 5 694202 100 150 2003 Buried Artesian City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 4 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 DOCUMENTATION LIST LGU Review Step Date Performed Part I Approval Notice Received from MDH March 9, 2015 Scoping 2 Meeting Held (4720.5349, subp. 1) April 29, 2015 Scoping Decision Notice Received (4720.5340, subp. 2) May 7, 2015 Remaining Portion of Plan Submitted to Local Government Units February 25, 2016 (LGUs) (4720.5350, subp. 1 & 2) Review Considered (4720.5350, subp. 3) February through April Public Hearing Conducted (4720.5350, subp. 4) TBD Remaining Portion WHP Plan Submitted (4720.5360, subp. 1) TBD Approved Review Notice Received t- TBD City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 5 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 ACRONYM LIST CCR CWI DNR DWSMA I STS IWMZ LG U MCL MDA MDH MGS MnDOT • PARS • PCA MRWA PCSI SWP WHP WHPA WIMN Consumer Confidence Report County Well Index Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Drinking Water Supply Management Area Individual Sewage Treatment System Inner Wellhead Management Zone Local Government UnitF Maximum Contaminant Level Minnesota Department of Agriculture Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Geological Survey Minnesota Department of Transportation DNR Permitting and Reporting System Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minnesota Rural Water Association Potential Contaminant Source Inventory Source Water Protection Wellhead Protection Wellhead Protection Area What's In My Neighborhood LGU Review City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 6 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Wellhead Protection (WHP) Plan for the City of Monticello (City) addresses the five municipal water supply wells used by the City (Wells No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and the associated source water aquifers (the Mt. Simon and Quaternary Buried Artesian — the aquifers from which the municipal wells pump water). The city's existing WHP Plan, dated August 2005, is being amended because ten years have passed since the approval of the last WHP Plan. Appendix C, Figure 15 compares the existing wellhead protection area (WHPA) to the amended WHPA. Part 1 of the Plan (Appendix C) was completed and approved in March of 2015 by Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. The Plan (Part 1) presented: the delineation of the Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPA); the drinking water supply management area (DWSMA); and the vulnerability assessments for the system's wells and aquifers within the DWSMA. The boundaries of the WHPA /DWSMA are shown in Figure 1, Appendix B. Water supply wells covered by this delineation and this Part 2 Plan Amendment are listed on page 4. The vulnerability assessment for the aquifers within the DWSMA was performed using available information and indicates that the vulnerability of the aquifers used by the system varies from low to moderate. The results of the aquifer vulnerability assessment determined for the City wells and tanks must be managed within the DWSMA as determined by the MDH: Low vulnerability areas — wells Moderate vulnerability areas — wells, tanks, spill /remediation sites, leaking underground tank sites. Primarily uses associated with petroleum products. This document includes the following information: • A review of data elements identified by the MDH as applicable to the DWSMA; • Results of an inventory of potential contaminant sources within the DWSMA; • Review of changes, issues, problems, and opportunities related to the public water supply and the identified potential contaminant sources; • A discussion of potential contaminant source management strategies and the goals, objectives, and action plans associated with these management strategies; and • A review of the wellhead and source water protection evaluation program and the City's alternative water supply contingency strategy. The goals and objectives of this Plan focus on: managing potential contaminant sources within the DWSMA; reducing the potential contaminant pathways to the source water aquifer that may be provided by private wells; and educating property owners and water supply users. The City's WHP team has identified the following goals for implementation of this Plan: Goal 1: The City will work to maintain or improve the current level of water quality so that the municipal water supply will continue to meet or exceed all applicable state and federal water quality standards. Goal 2: The City will work to continue to supply sufficient water quantity for system users and emergency needs. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 7 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review Goal3: The City will provide and promote activities that protect the source water aquifer which provides water to the municipal system. This will include increased public education of the Wellhead and Source Water Protection Program and groundwater - related issues, as well as management of the identified potential contaminant sources and conveyance mechanisms within the DWSMA. Goal4: The City will continue to collect data to support future wellhead and source water protection efforts. Implementation of these goals will be achieved through direct management efforts within the following areas to prevent future contamination of the aquifer and increase awareness of groundwater protection: A. Well Management B. Public Education C. Storage Tank Management D. Data Collection E. Water Conservation F. Land Use Management G. Planning and Zoning H. Implementation I. Evaluation The effectiveness of the Plan must be evaluated to determine whether the implementation activities are consistent with the Plan's intent. Monitoring will be on -going and a written evaluation of the Plan and associated activities will be conducted every two and one -half years that the Plan is in effect. 9 r, City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 8 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review CHAPTER ONE DATA ELEMENTS AND ASSESSMENT (4720.5200) 1. REQUIRED DATA ELEMENTS In accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 4720.5200, the following data elements are considered for evaluation in a wellhead protection (WHP) plan (the Plan). Those elements required for evaluation are determined by the MDH based on the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) vulnerability, which ranges from low to moderate for the city of Monticello (City). The Plan scope is described in the MDH Scoping 2 Decision Letter received by the City on April 4, 2014. A. Physical Data Elements Physical data elements to be considered include geology and water resources. 1. Precipitation This data element is not required for this WHP Plan, per the Scoping 2 Decision Letter. 2. Geology All geological analyses were conducted and are included in the Part 1 Plan (Appendix C). The geology in the vicinity of the City consists of Quaternary -age glacial and post - glacial deposits that are underlain by Cambrian -aged bedrock. Terrace deposits composed primarily of outwash sand and gravel are predominant throughout. These sand deposits overlie glacial till deposits. While the till does appear to be present over much of the area of the study, there does appear to be an area around City Wells No. 1 and 2 and extending to the north where the outwash is found from the surface to the bedrock. A narrow, buried bedrock valley is present in the area of the City Wells. The valley trends north to south and encompasses City Wells No. 1, 2, and 4 and is immediately west of Wells No. 3 and 5. This valley extends down to the Red Clastics Bedrock layer, below the Mt. Simon Sandstone. City Well No. 3 is completed in this layer as well as a small "island" of Mt. Simon Sandstone. Results of Part 1 indicate a low geological sensitivity for areas near Wells No. 1, 2, 3, and 4; while moderate geologic sensitivity for Well No. 5. In addition, the bedrock geology is provided in Appendix C. 3. Soil Conditions This data element is not required for this WHP Plan per the Scoping 2 Decision Letter. 4. Water Resources Information on the public waters of the City's DWSMA was considered in the analysis of this Plan. The dominant surface water resource in the City is the Mississippi River, which is located along the northeast border of the DWSMA. Floodplains within the DWSMA are another important component to contaminant transport. The 100 -year floodplain of the Mississippi River lies in the northeast border of the DWSMA (Figure 2, Appendix B). City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 9 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review B. Land Use Data Elements Land use and public utilities are required to be analyzed under the land use data elements. 1. Land Use Historical and current land use in the vicinity of the DWSMA is discussed in this section, as well as information on political and parcel boundaries. Figure 3, Appendix B indicates the parcels located within the DWSMA, which incorporates about half of the City's parcels. The portion of the DWSMA north of Interstate 94 is the location of the historic Monticello downtown, which is where the center of industry and trade started in the early 1900s. Approximately two thirds of the land in the City's DWSMA is developed. The remaining land is vacant or agricultural. Figure 4, Appendix B indicates the land uses that are found in the DWSMA. Such land uses include single family and multi - family residential, parks and open space, commercial property, institutional uses, and agricultural uses. The chart below details the number of acres for each land use type. The primary land uses in the DWSMA are single family residential, agricultural, and commercial. Almost 20 percent of the land in the DWSMA is vacant and slated for commercial or industrial development. Land Use - DWSMA No. of Parcels Acres Agricultural 22 673 Commercial 262 278 Golf Course 6 61 Industrial and Utility 43 139 Institutional and School 28 122 Parks and Public Land 69 160 Railroad 2 65 Manu Home Park 6 101 Multi - Family Residential 48 47 Right of Way 29 132 Single Family Residential 1126 688 Singe Family Attached 366 54 Undeveloped 40 724 Regulations for newly developed land is guided by the City's zoning map, which is illustrated by Figure 5, Appendix B. The predominant planned land use is commercial, which has been the historical land use pattern for the central part of the DWSMA and will continue into the future, given the proximity to Interstate 94. 2. Public Utility Services City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 10 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review Public utilities were evaluated to determine their potential influence and impact on the City's drinking water supply. Storm sewers, sanitary sewers, public drainage systems, public water supply, and gas and oil pipelines were considered and are included in the WHP Plan. a. Transportation Routes and Corridors Transportation routes and corridors were considered and are on file at the City. Of note are County Road 39, County Highway 75, Minnesota State Highway 25, and Interstate 94 (See Figure X, Appendix B). b. Storm Sewer System The storm sewer system is managed and maintained by the City. The existing storm sewer within the DWSMA is depicted in Figure 6, Appendix B. Storm sewer networks are located throughout the DWSMA. c. Wastewater Systems The City's sanitary sewer system is completely connected to all users within the DWSMA (Figure 7, Appendix B). d. Public Drainage Systems There are no public drainage systems located within the DWSMA. e. Public Water Systems Iff Currently, users within the DWSMA are connected to the municipal water supply (Figure 8, Appendix B). However, there are still users within the DWSMA that use private wells as their water supply. f. Gas and Oil Pipelines Gas pipelines exist within the DWSMA. A map that indicates the locations of major gas pipelines within the DWSMA is on file with the City but is not included in this Plan in consideration of public safety. To the City's knowledge, oil pipelines do not exist within the DWSMA. 3. Potential Contaminant Source Inventory (PCSI) Land use is closely related to the potential contaminant source inventory (PCSI) for the DWSMA, as these contamination sites are typically related to the type and intensity of use of the property. A PCSI was completed within the DWSMA boundary. Data was extracted from existing databases - including the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) What's in my Neighborhood (WIMN) Database, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) WIMN, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) Priorities List, and the County Well Index (CWI) - and was then verified. Data points collected from the MPCA WIMN database were first properly located through aerial photography and additional research. The list of sites was reduced by assigning the vulnerability of the City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 11 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review DWSMA to each data point and removing those sites that did not fit the criteria for the vulnerability setting. Next, potential contaminant and material codes were added to the sites, and a table and map (Table 1, Appendix A and Figure 9, Appendix B) were produced to display the locations and types of potential contaminants throughout the DWSMA. Data points were also collected from the CWI and MDH Well and Old Municipal Well databases. Wells retrieved were included in all vulnerability types. Figure 8, Appendix B includes the location of the water distribution system and municipal water supply wells. Figure 10, Appendix B includes public and private wells within the City. A table of wells, including unique numbers, use codes, and other pertinent information, is in Appendix A as Tables 2a and 2b. A table of sealed wells within the DWSMA is in Appendix A as Table 3. A list of unlocated wells and wells identified on the Old Municipal Well database were taken to the City. With local knowledge and information provided by the CWI, the location of each well on the list was verified. Data for unlocated wells near the DWSMA was also evaluated. The locations of all but four were located Tables 4 and 5, Appendix A show the previously unlocated wells and the remaining unlocated wells. In addition, the MDH completed and provided survey results for the Inner Wellhead Management Zone (IWMZ) that surrounds each municipal well at a 200 - foot - radius. Results of this survey remain as submitted by the MDH and are included in Appendix D. Provided below is a summary of PCSI results: • Public and Private Wells. There are five public and 46 known private wells currently active in the DWSMA according to the CWI. There is one inactive private well used as an emergency supply. In total, 46 unlocated wells from the CWI were considered. Of these 46 wells, 17 are sealed and were not considered further. The list of 29 remaining unlocated wells was evaluated by the City. It was determined that nine of the wells are outside of the DWSMA. The locations of an additional 14 were found and placed on the correct location in, Table 4, Appendix A and Figure 10, Appendix B. There remain six unlocated wells possibly in the DWSMA. The list of these wells is included in Appendix A, Table S. • Class V Wells. The MDH database includes one potential Class V well in the City. However, based on the geocoding address it is not located in the DWSMA and therefore was not included in the PCSI. • Leak Sites. There are currently four active and one inactive leaking underground storage tank sites in the DWSMA. • Spill Sites. PCSI results show that there are three active spill sites and four inactive spill sites in the DWSMA. • Storage Tanks. There are currently five underground storage tank (UST) sites and six aboveground storage tank (AST) sites in the DWSMA. One aboveground and one belowground tank are inactive. All of the tanks contain(ed) fuels, gases, or oils. • MDA Priorities List. There are no sites listed on the MDA priorities list that are located within the DWSMA. • IWMZ Results. Located within 200 -feet of the municipal wells are buried sanitary sewer pipes, operating wells, a monitoring well, a pollutant or contaminant that may drain into the soil, stormwater drain pipes, gravel pockets for clear water drainage, and a fire or flushing hydrant. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 12 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review The activities in Chapter 5 of this Plan outline management activities to address the results of the PCSI. C. Water Quantity Data Elements Water levels in lakes and streams can impact aquifers, particularly if the systems are closely connected hydraulically. Both surface water and groundwater data elements are required by the MDH to be considered. Surface Water Quantity While the City is located on the Mississippi River; there are no existing streams or lakes and limited wetlands within the City's DWSMA. To the City's knowledge, there is one known conflict within the DWSMA. Surface water bodies did influence the static levels in the City wells because of an apparent hydraulic connection between the Mississippi River and the source aquifers. During the dewatering of the Mississippi River for bridge construction an impact was shown to the city wells. 2. Groundwater Quantity An Appropriation Permit is required for any user that withdrawals more than 10,000 gallons of water per day or 1 million gallons per year. The permits are recorded within the DNR Permitting and Reporting System (MPARS). There are currently seventeen users with Appropriation Permits located within the DWSMA. The City currently operates five of these wells as active water supply wells (Well No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). As outlined in Part 1 of the Plan (Appendix Q and depicted on the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Use Database System under Permit No. 1964 -1059. The City pumped an average of 614 million gallons of water per year. No substantial changes in water use were observed between 2009 and 2013. Maximum pumping volumes over the five year timeframe occurred in 2009. In addition to the City's water supply wells, the twelve wells with appropriation permits within the DWSMA and are depicted on the DNR Use Database System under Permit No. 1990 -3396, 1993 -3050, and 1993 -3161 (See figure 7, Appendix B) Previously during the Highway 25 bridge construction, historical pumping data indicated that there was a drop in static water levels in the City well during dewatering. This may indicate a connection between groundwater levels and the Mississippi River. However, currently it appears that the source water aquifers used by the public water supply system is sufficient and adequate in quantity to provide water for the City's residents over the duration of the Plan. D. Water Quality Data Elements Groundwater quality was reviewed; however, it was not required to be submitted by the MDH. Included in the review was a summary of existing groundwater quality data along with groundwater chemistry, isotope data, and groundwater tracer studies. Existing analyses of groundwater contamination and properties containing contamination were also evaluated. The groundwater quality in the City meets regulatory standards. A more detailed summary of groundwater quality parameters within the DWSMA is on file at the City. 1. Surface Water Quality City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 13 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review Data collection will be conducted in the future to assess any connection with the surface water and the City's water supply wells to ensure the water quality is not affected from hydraulic connections. However, this data element is not required for this WHP Plan, per the Scoping 2 Decision Letter and will not be assessed within this Plan. 2. Groundwater Quality Groundwater bacteriological and chemical data have been reviewed as part of Part 1 of the WHP Plan. The City produces an annual report on the quality of its groundwater called the Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) which can be found in Appendix E. The CCR outlines the results of quality monitoring performed on the City's drinking water. The attached CCR indicates that the City is in compliance with maximum contaminant levels set by the State and Federal Safe Drinking Water Rules for the contaminants analyzed. Water supplied by the City meet all Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) by the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. To the City's knowledge there are currently no known tracer studies on file. 11. ASSESSMENT OF DATA ELEMENTS Based on the data available for the required data elements, present and future implications of the data elements are described below for the use of the wells, quality and quantity of water supplying the public water supply wells, and the land and groundwater uses in the DWSMA. A. Use of the Well The City currently operates five active water supply wells (Wells No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) (Figure 10, Appendix B). Additional information about the City's water supply system in general is present in the City's Comprehensive Plan —The Plan for Public Facilities and Services. Well construction details, well logs, and pumping rates are included in the WHP Plan Part 1 (Appendix Q document. B. Quality and Quantity of Water Supplying the Public Water Supply Well Part 1 of the Plan outlines the vulnerability of the public supply wells based on DNR geologic sensitivity, casing integrity, casing depth, pumping rate, isolation distance from contaminants, and chemical and isotopic information. City Wells No. 2, 3, 4, and 5 were determined to be vulnerable. In addition, tritium has been detected above 1 Tritium Unit in wells No. 2, 3, 4, and 5. While tritium itself is non - toxic, it does indicate a surface - groundwater connection. To fully understand this connection as well as the transfer of contaminants to the water source, more specific information is required. A better understanding of the connection between City's well water, surface water, and precipitation, can be achieved via stable isotope analysis. Localized hydraulic conductivity and observation well data can be used to better characterize the vertical hydraulic connection and gradient between the Quaternary Buried Artesian and Mt. Simon Aquifers. Opportunities and objectives to achieve these initiatives are outlined in Chapters Three and Five of this Plan. C. The Land and Groundwater Uses in the Drinking Water Supply Management Area City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 14 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review Land use and development practices have potential to impact groundwater in several ways. Use and storage of toxic materials, usually found in industrial and commercial uses, have the potential to spill and enter the groundwater. It is critical to locate and document where these potential contaminants exist in order to monitor those uses, provide opportunities to educate the businesses, and consider policies regarding stricter monitoring of potential new land uses. The existing land uses and zoning maps can be found in Figure 4 and Figure 5, Appendix B. Land patterns in the central part of the DWSMA are characterized by largely historical, older and newer commercial development. There is also a large amount of vacant land located in the moderately vulnerable portion of the DWSMA; therefore, it will be important to consider careful placement of new uses and new private or public wells in these locations. Population is expected to grow rapidly in the City. The Comprehensive Plan calls for a rate of growth of 60 units per year, which will cause the need of more water to households and businesses. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 15 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review CHAPTER TWO IMPACT OF CHANGES ON PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WELLS (4720.5220) In accordance with Minnesota Rules 4720.5220 a WHP Plan must identify and describe expected changes that may occur during the next ten years to: 1. The physical environment; 2. Land use; 3. Surface water; and 4. Groundwater 1. POTENTIAL CHANGES IDENTIFIED Considering a 10 -year life of the Plan, potential changes to the physical environment and land use were identified. A. Physical Environment The primary changes in the physical environment of the City of Monticello will be related to the land use and infrastructure related to growth. B. Land Use The City has experienced growth since 1970, when it had 1,636 people. Currently at a population of approximately 13,000 residents, The City plans for continued growth in residents, businesses, and industrial development. Much of commercial and residential development is planned for the DWSMA. Most of these households will be on single family lots. The majority of planned business will be retail and other similar type commercial. C. Surface Water This section was not to be completed, per the Scoping 2 Decision Letter. However, existing and planned transportation corridors (roadways and rail) located in the DWSMA are a potential source of contamination as it relates to the potential of leakage or spills from freight. D. Groundwater It is expected that the City will need additional wells to meet the projected increase in demand of water as it grows. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 16 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 11. IMPACT OF CHANGES LGU Review A. Changes Identified Above Influence of Existing Water and Land Government Programs and Regulations The primary impacts associated with changes in physical, land use, and groundwater supply is the need to add infrastructure to accommodate increasing commercial and residential demand. In Chapter Five, Plan of Action, a series of policies and programs are proposed to balance the growth increases with the infrastructure needs to mitigate the negative impacts of growth and minimize potential sources of contamination to the DWSMA. Federal and State Regulations All tank operators and owners must comply with both federal and state regulations for USTs. At the federal level, tank operators and owners for USTs must comply with 40 CFR Part 280 -282. At the state level, operators and owners must comply with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7150. Enforcement of state and federal regulations is the responsibility of the MPCA. The existing federal and state regulations provide adequate controls to manage USTs within the DWSMA. ASTs which store liquid substances that may pollute the waters of the state are regulated by Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7151, if the site capacity is less than one million gallons. AST regulations are also enforced by the MPCA. Existing regulations provide adequate controls to manage storage tanks within the DWSMA. In addition to the MPCA, the state and local fire marshal also regulate tanks. Wright County Regulations Wright County has floodplain and shoreland standards as well as stormwater management and erosion control adopted in their ordinances. All of these ordinances provide protection for surface water and ultimately groundwater. City of Monticello The City has shoreland and floodplain zoning districts that protect those areas from incompatible development that could negatively impact groundwater. Also, the City requires detailed review of surface water plans for new development, ensuring that state standards are met. The City also developed a Sourcewater Protection pamphlet that educates the public about ways to protect sourcewater. The City keeps up -to -date information regarding wellhead protection on their website. B. Administrative, Technical, and Financial Considerations With existing cost -share programs and grant opportunities, the City will have resources available to regulate the public water supply's source water and implement the management strategies found herein. Funds to support ongoing wellhead and source water protection efforts will come from the City's water utility fund and MDH grants. Wellhead and source water protection activities will be evaluated on an annual basis, and any changes in the focus of the tasks will also be evaluated to determine if additional funding will be necessary to accommodate the changes. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 17 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review The City intends to work in conjunction with Sherburne County and Wright County to protect the surface water and source water resources as much as possible when it is beneficial and logistically feasible. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 18 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review CHAPTER THREE ISSUES, PROBLEMS, AND OPPORTUNITIES (4720.5230) 1. WATER USE AND LAND USE ISSUES, PROBLEMS, AND OPPORTUNITIES Based on the assessment of the data available issues, problems, and opportunities can be defined for the source water aquifer, groundwater quality, and DWSMA. A. Source Water Aquifer Part 1 of the Plan (Appendix Q determined that the WHPA and corresponding DWSMA for the source aquifer range from low to moderate vulnerability, and therefore some locations are more likely to be affected by land use activities. The City has an opportunity to improve knowledge about the source water aquifer by assisting MDH in collecting data using observation wells. Specific objectives and related activities are included in Chapter 5 of this Plan. Land use and zoning regulations can protect the quality of the aquifers by discouraging types of construction or activity that may cause contamination, within the moderate vulnerability area. The City is expected to see large residential and commercial growth. Most is planned to occur within the DWSMA. The additional growth will likely require additional wells to meet the required demand. Additional wells are a problem as they increase the potential for contamination, however, there is an opportunity to work with the MDH and DNR to reduce these risks. The ongoing collection of data has been identified as an opportunity to support future wellhead protection efforts. B. Groundwater Quality Groundwater pumped from the Quaternary Buried Artesian and Mt. Simon aquifers by the municipal wells are currently free of pathogens and disease - causing organisms. In addition, the City's water supply currently meets or exceeds state and federal water quality requirements. The presence of tritium in the northeast area of the DWSMA is not a health risk but is an indication of the vulnerability of the aquifer. The City's Consumer Confidence Reports, describing water quality for 2015 can be found in Appendix E. Well water quality sampling will need to continue so that changes in water quality can be identified. There are numerous private wells within the DWSMA which increase the potential for contamination and have been identified as an issue. In a portion of the DWSMA there are transportation corridors which pose a risk of contamination to the groundwater and surface water in the case of a spill event. Coordination with other local governments units (LGUs) in the DWSMA along with the MDH and DNR to share and maintain information on wells and potential contaminants will be a challenge and an opportunity. The City of Monticello has an emergency response plan through the Fire Department to contain and respond to spills. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 19 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 C. Drinking Water Supply Management Area LGU Review Land uses found within the DWSMA include agricultural, commercial, industrial, institutional /school, parks /public lands, single and multi - family residential, single family attached, and undeveloped land. Potential contaminant sources identified are of concern and need to be monitored. A problem and issue for the City will be that it does not have legal capabilities to regulate activities within its DWSMA that are outside of the City's city limits. Some opportunities identified are: • Working with Wright and Sherburne County and other government entities to share information and create policies that protect the aquifers. • Tracking and updating the list of potential contaminant sources as new information become available. • Educating landowners on proper well management and spill prevention. • Routinely monitoring for land use and potential contaminant source changes within IWMZ (200- foot - radius around the wells) in consideration of State Well Code Requirements. • Utilizing local regulations related to storm water management to create resource protection within the DWSMA • Placing high priority on new and existing wells and potential contaminant sources identified in the IWMZ and one year time of travel area for the implementation of best management practices. H. ASSESSMENT OF WATER USE AND LAND USE ISSUES, PROBLEMS, AND OPPORTUNITIES Issues, problems, and opportunities disclosed by government agencies have been assessed through public meetings, written comments, and analysis of data elements. A. Issues, Problems, and Opportunities Disclosed at Public Meetings and in Written Comments At the beginning of the WHP amendment process, the City sent a notification to other LGUs of its intention to amend their wellhead and source water protection efforts. After approval by MDH, the City sent copies of the Part 1 report to the LGUs. The City was not informed of any issues, problems, or opportunities by the LGUs during that time. In addition, the WHP Plan will be sent out to all LGUs for a mandated 60 day review on February X, 2016. Following this review any comments that are received will be addressed by the City B. Issues, Problems, and Opportunities Related to the Data Elements Part 1 and Part 2 of the WHP Plan have utilized current local and regional information available for compiling and assessing data elements. At a minimum, this WHP Plan will be revised or updated every 10 years as required by Minnesota Rules and the most recent and accurate data will be utilized at that time. To support ongoing WHP efforts, the City will collect data on wells, water quality, and land use within its DWSMA. Due to limited resources to independently collect the full range of data and re- create City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 20 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review the necessary databases, the City will continue to mainly rely on databases maintained by the State and County agencies to obtain and verify data as needed. C. Issues, Problems, and Opportunities Related to Status & Adequacy of Official Controls, Plans, and Other Local, State, and Federal Programs Numerous controls, plans, and programs exist that may be used to achieve the goals identified in this Plan. State agencies and LGUs currently enforce land use ordinances, zoning laws, sewer ordinances, well permits, and groundwater use appropriation permits. It is anticipated that most local issues may be adequately addressed through these existing processes and adopting best management practices as well as land use policies that properly plan for new growth within the DWSMA. No additional regulations are recommended to be imposed at this time. However, it is recommended that overall regional coordination of WHP efforts be initiated where feasible. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 21 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review CHAPTER FOUR WELLHEAD PROTECTION GOALS (4720.5240) In accordance with Minnesota Rules 4720.5240 this section must address goals for present and future water use and land use to provide a framework for determining plan objectives and related actions. Goals were selected based on the information gathered and compiled from the data elements, delineations of the WHPA and DWSMA, results of the vulnerability assessments, results of the PCSI, expected changes in land and water uses, identified issues, problems, and opportunities, and evaluation of this information. The public water supply is considered to be low to moderately vulnerable. Therefore, the goals and objectives of this Plan will focus on managing potential contaminant sources within the DWSMA, reducing the potential contaminant pathways to the source water aquifer that may be provided by private wells, educating property owners and water supply users, and considering policies that control future siting of potential contaminants. The City's WHP team has identified the following goals for implementation of this Plan: Goal 1: The City will work to maintain or improve the current level of water quality so that the municipal water supply will continue to meet or exceed all applicable state and federal water quality standards. Goal 2: The City will work to continue to supply sufficient water quantity for system users and emergency needs. Goal 3: The City will provide and promote activities that protect the source water aquifer that provides water to the municipal system. This will include increased public awareness of the wellhead and source water protection program and groundwater - related issues, and management of the identified potential contaminant sources and conveyance mechanisms within the DWSMA. Goal 4: The City will continue to collect data to support future wellhead and source water protection efforts. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 22 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 CHAPTER FIVE OBJECTIVES AND PLANS OF ACTION (4720.5250) 1. OBJECTIVES LGU Review Given the issues, problems, and opportunities discussed in Chapter Three and the goals stated in Chapter Four, objectives have been developed to improve wellhead protection in the following areas: A. Well Management B. Public Education C. Storage Tank Management D. Data Collection E. Water Conservation F. Land Use Management G. Planning and Zoning H. Implementation 1. Evaluation 11. Plan of Action The Plan delegates direct management efforts to prevent future contamination of the aquifer and increase awareness of groundwater protection through defined objectives and action plans. A. Well Management Objective Al: Take measures to promote proper sealing of abandoned, unused, unmaintained, or damaged wells. Wft. A Action A1.1: Make property owners aware of potential technical and financial resources that are available to assist them in securing grant funding for properly sealing wells. Who: City Staff Cooperators: Wright and Sherburne County Time Frame: Annually, beginning Year 1 and ending Year 10 following the adoption of this plan Estimated Cost: $500 each time of notification Goal Achieved: Goal 3: Source water aquifer protection How: Use the City's website, newsletters, or direct mailings to make owners aware of well sealing cost -share programs. Provide information to realtors to pass along to property owners preparing to sell and during disclosure process. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 23 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review Action A1.2: Seek funds when available and feasible to locate and seal old municipal or privately owned wells located within the City's DWSMA. Who: City Staff Cooperators: Wright and Sherburne County, MDH, consultant Time Frame: Ongoing throughout Years 1 -10 of the WHPP, when grant funding is available or Estimated Cost: wells are located. Estimated Cost: $1,000 (grant application); additional cost for sealing TBD Goal Achieved: Goal 3: Source water aquifer protection How: If wells are discovered on City owned property, grant funding shall be sought to properly seal the well. Implementation and Competitive Grants are available by the MDH Source Water Protection (SWP) program. One can submit grant applications twice per year. Objective A2: Take measures to identify and inform properties with abandoned, unused, unmaintained, or damaged wells and potential cross connection between private wells and the City's water system. Action A2: Identify and inform properties with potential supply cross connections or wells that pose a hazard to the public water supply. Who: City Staff or consultant Cooperators: MDH, Wright and Sherburne County, City of Big Lake Time Frame: Annually, beginning Year 1 and ending Year 10 following the adoption of this plan Estimated Cost: $500 per mailing Goal Achieved: Goal 1: Maintain or improve current water quality, Goal 3: Source water aquifer protection How: Provide residents information on lost wells when changing water meters. Ask residents for permission to check basements for wells during this process. Objective A3: Educate the public about proper well management. Action A3: Using public events, City's website, newsletter, or other direct mailings provide information to the public on proper well management. Who: City Staff Cooperators: MDH, Minnesota Rural Water Association (MRWA), consultant Time Frame: Year 1 following the adoption of this plan, updating biannually Estimated Cost: $500 per publishing Goal Achieved: Goal 3: Promote activities to raise awareness How: Use the City's website, CCR, newsletter, or social media sites to provide education on proper well management by linking the MDH's Well Owner's Handbook. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 24 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 Objective A4: Identify new high- capacity wells within the DWSMA. LGU Review Action A4: The City will work with the DNR and MDH to address implications of high capacity well construction or appropriation permitting changes within the City's own drinking water supply or DWSMA boundary. Who: City Staff Cooperators: DNR, MDH, consultant Time Frame: Year 2 following the adoption of this plan or as needed Estimated Cost: Varies Goal Achieved: Goal 2: Continue to supply sufficient water quantity for system users How: The DNR is currently sending out notices to interested parties before new How: large capacity well construction. If the City receives a notice, it will work with DNR and MDH to determined implications for the DWSMA or the vulnerability of the aquifer. If the changes result in a required amendment to this Plan, the City will seek grant funding for assistance. Objective A5: Continue to monitor water quality and quantity from the City's wells and local surface water sources to ensure water quality standards are met. Action A5: Examine and review the annual water quantity and quality reports to identify changes in groundwater levels and concentrations of constituents. Who: City Staff Cooperators: Consultant, MDH Time Frame: Monthly — groundwater levels; when available — quality reports Estimated Cost: No additional cost —staff time Goal Achieved: Goal 1: Maintain or improve the current level of water quality; Goal 2: Continue to supply sufficient water quantity How: The City will continue to receive water quality reports, at which time the reports will be compared to previous years to evaluate trends or changes. Groundwater levels shall be recorded monthly within the City's water supply wells. Staff will review annual water quality reports and provide summaries about changes over time. If new contaminant sources are found, the City will ensure wells meet isolation distance requirements. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 25 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review Objective A6: Monitor the IWMZ areas for the addition of, or changes to, potential contaminant sources. Action A6: City staff will review and update IWMZ survey form for all wells in cooperation with MDH to determine if there have been additions or changes to potential contaminant sources. Who: City Staff Cooperators: MDH Time Frame: Year 5 and Year 10 following the adoption of this plan Estimated Cost: None, MDH cost and City Staff time Goal Achieved: Goal 1: Work to maintain or improve current water quality How: If changes are made to the items identified in the IWMZ, the City will update with the approval of MDH to survey the IWMZ every five years. The City will notify property owners if any well setback distances are violated. Seek grant funding to Cooperate with MDH to complete the next IWMZ survey. Objective A7: Management of Class V Injection Wells Action A7: If any Class V injection wells are identified in the future, add those wells to the well inventory and work with the MDH to provide information to the property owner on management and /or permitting options. Who: City Public Works Department Cooperators: Consultant, DNR, MDH, PCA Time Frame: Ongoing throughout years 1— 10 of this WHPP Estimated Cost: No additional cost Goal Achieved: Goal 1: Work to maintain or improve current water quality; Goal 3: Source water aquifer protection How: Add any new Class V injection wells to the PCSI inventory. v City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 26 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 B. Public Education LGU Review Objective B1: Develop a public support and understanding for the WHP planning through public events and the use of websites, newsletters, and handouts. Action B1.1: Include information about WHP and groundwater protection in the City newsletter. Who: City Staff Cooperators: MDH, MRWA Time Frame: Year 1 and Year 5 following the adoption of this plan Estimated Cost: $500 each mailing /posting Goal Achieved: Goal 3: Make information available to promote wellhead and source water protection How: Identify and obtain existing educational materials available from MDH and MRWA. Write newsletter articles describing WHP and include contact information and website addresses for existing educational resources. Action B1.2: Provide information about the WHP Plan and links to other WHP related resources on the City's website. Who: City Staff Cooperators: MRWA, MDH Time Frame: Year 1 following the adoption of this plan Estimated Cost: $500 each year of posting Goal Achieved: Goal 3: Make information available to promote wellhead and source water protection How: Provide a summary of WHP goals and implementation. Provide links to WHP related websites including MDH, MDA, and EPA. Objective 132: Educate private utility owners about the DWSMA location. Action 132: Send a DWSMA map to oil and gas pipeline owners. Who: City Staff Cooperators: MDH, utility owners Time Frame: Year 1 following the adoption of this plan Estimated Cost: $200 each mailing /posting Goal Achieved: Goal 3: Make information available to promote wellhead and source water protection How: Give the owners a map to inform them of the DWSMA boundary and emphasize the importance of spill clean -up and response. Potentially provide this information during the Northern Natural Gas Dinner event, if feasible. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 27 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review Objective B3: Educate emergency management officials of the importance of spills /clean -up within the DWSMA due to its sensitivity. Action B3: Send a summary memo to the Fire Department, County Emergency Manager, County Engineer, and MnDOT regarding the DWSMA location, sensitivity, and importance of spill cleanup within the management area. Who: City Staff Cooperators: MDH, MRWA, Fire Department, MnDOT, Wright and Sherburne County Time Frame: Year 2 following the adoption of this plan Estimated Cost: $500 Goal Achieved: Goal 3: Make information available to promote wellhead and source water protection How: Develop a spill response plan for transportation corridors with local emergency management officials on the DWSMA location and importance of spill cleanup within the management areas. Objective 134: Provide information on preventing leaks and proper tank maintenance to tank owners in WHP areas Action 134: Send reminder notices to new and old tank owners about tank regulations and the importance of early leak detection. Who: City Staff Cooperators: MDH, MRWA, Fire Department, MnDOT, Wright and Sherburne County Time Frame: Year 2 following the adoption of this plan Estimated Cost: $500 Goal Achieved: Goal 3: Make information available to promote wellhead and source water protection How: City can assist owners on methods to use to check for leaks and how to keep records by sending out information through mailings, City's website, social media, etc. The City could also require the use of certified contractors for installation and removal of unregulated underground tanks. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 28 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 C. STORAGE TANK MANAGEMENT LGU Review Objective Cl: Notify owners of storage tanks located within the DWSMA that the tank is in a source water protection area and educate owners of properties containing the storage tanks of the importance of spill prevention. Action Cl: Update list of storage tank owners, contact each property owner, and make them aware of their placement within the City's DWSMA. Who: City Staff Cooperators: MDH, MPCA, Consultant Time Frame: Year 1 following the adoption of this plan Estimated Cost: $1,500 Goal Achieved: Goal 1: Maintain or improve the current level of water quality; Goal 3: Increase awareness of wellhead and source water protection How: Send mailings to the property owners notifying them about the DWSMA delineation and the importance of spill prevention. Provide contact numbers for the appropriate government agencies to each property owner. Provide tank owners information and resources to acquire the appropriate spill clean -up materials (sorbent materials, etc.) and have these located on site. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 29 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 D. DATA COLLECTION LGU Review Objective D1: Continue to collect and maintain local geologic and hydrogeological data in order to improve and augment information and to provide additional data for future amendments to this Plan. Action D1: Monitor static and pumping levels in municipal wells. Who: City Staff Cooperators: DNR, consultant Time Frame: Annually following the adoption of this plan. Estimated Cost: Staff time Goal Achieved: Goal 4: Continue to collect data to support wellhead and source water How: protection How: Conduct routine collection of groundwater levels in the municipal wells, which will provide data for evaluation of groundwater elevation trends over time. This data can also be used to verify the groundwater flow field in the source water aquifer, while also evaluating if a cross connection between the Mississippi River and groundwater levels exist. Action D1.2: Obtain a more area - specific hydraulic conductivity data in the area of City Wells to reduce groundwater model uncertainty. Who: City Staff Cooperators: DNR, Minnesota Geologic Survey, Consultant Time Frame: Year 7 following the adoption of this Plan Estimated Cost: Varies depending on request Goal Achieved: Goal 4: Continue data collection to support future wellhead and source water protection How: Conduct pumping test on City wells and /or other existing high capacity wells, if determined to be needed by the MDH area hydrologist. r, City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 30 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review Objective D2: Continue to cooperate with and support future data collection efforts by other agencies. Action D2: Provide data from additional pumping tests on City wells or other high capacity wells if funding is available to the agencies listed below. The City will also assist in the data collection efforts by other agencies when feasible. Who: City Staff Cooperators: MPCA, MDH, DNR, USGS, Consultant Time Frame: On- going, when requested Estimated Cost: Varies depending on request Goal Achieved: Goal 4: Continue data collection to support future wellhead and source How: water protection How: Provide assistance to agencies as requested when feasible. If the City conducts pumping tests independently of this Plan, the results will be submitted to MDH. The City will allow regional and state agencies to access well water, surface water from the Mississippi River, and precipitation to conduct stable isotope analyses. Objective D3: Evaluate the water quality monitoring strategy and results to ensure that they are consistent with federal and state requirements yet also take into account local conditions. Action D3: Maintain water quality sampling requirements mandated by MDH and analyze trends in water chemistry, looking for any possible degradation of quality or changes in aquifer hydraulics. Who: City Staff Cooperators: MDH, Consultant Time Frame: Ongoing Estimated Cost: Staff time and $1,500 for each in -depth analysis Goal Achieved: Goal 4: Continue data collection to support future wellhead and source water protection How: Identify changes to trends in water chemistry by evaluating records of analysis results. This includes sharing data with the MDH and the option to sample for radiological testing. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 31 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review Objective D4: Maintain up -to -date information about wells and potential contaminant sources within the DWSMA. Action D4: In cooperation with existing state or local agencies and programs, maintain the database of wells, ISTSs, storage tanks, and shallow disposal wells within the DWSMA that was developed as part of this WHP Plan. Who: City Staff Cooperators: Property owners, MDH, Consultant Time Frame: Ongoing, as new information becomes available. Estimated Cost: Varies, Goal Achieved: Goal 4: Continue data collection to support future wellhead and source water protection How: An inventory of potential contaminant sources was performed as part of the development of this Plan. The database will be reviewed periodically and updated as information becomes available. E. WATER CONSERVATION Objective E.1: Improve existing community -wide water conservation program. Action E.1.1: Update conservation measures included in various plans within the City. Who: City Staff Cooperators: Consultant, MDH Time Frame: Year 3 or sooner Estimated Cost: $2,500 Goal Achieved: Goal 2: Continue to supply sufficient water quantities to consumers How: Educate the public to encourage users to voluntarily incorporate water saving habits and tools into their lifestyles; improve the existing water system's operation and maintenance procedures; incorporate costs associated with water conservation programs; and ensure that all customers are paying for the water they use through audits, leak detection, and meter replacement or calibration as they occur or as needed. This may include updating the city's DNR Water Supply Plan Water Conservation Section. Action E.1.2: Implement water conservation kits that may include the following literature on conservation, low -flow showerheads, dye tablets for toilet leak detection, and /or faucet aerators. Who: City Staff Cooperators: Consultant, MDH Time Frame: Year 7 Estimated Cost: $2,500 Goal Achieved: Goal 2: Continue to supply sufficient water quantities to consumers How: Encourage the public to conserve water through a variety of tools. Have information and kits available at Riverfest or another community event. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 32 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 F. LAND USE MANAGEMENT Objective F.1: Incorporate WHP initiatives into City Plans. LGU Review Action F.1.1: The City will use this Plan as a resource when updating its Comprehensive Plan, Water Supply Plan, normal zoning and planning review plans, and other relevant plans. Who: City Staff Cooperators: DNR, MDH, Consultant Time Frame: When other plans are revised Estimated Cost: Varies per plan Goal Achieved: Goal 3: Promote activities that protect the source water aquifer How: WHP initiatives will be addressed and incorporated into the City's various plan updates. Copies of the WHP Plan will be distributed to City planning staff. Action F.1.2: Collaborate with other jurisdictions within the DWSMA to identify land use changes outside the City limits. Who: City Staff Cooperators: County Time Frame: Year 1 Estimated Cost: $500 Goal Achieved: Goal 4: Continue to collect data to support wellhead and source water How: protection How: Set up conference a conference call as well as distribute copies of this Plan to other jurisdictions within the DWSMA. Review and comment on land use plans and activities outside city boundaries including Big Lake, Sherburne, and Wright County. G. Planning and Zoning Objective G.1: Consider the location and vulnerability of the DWSMA when reviewing land use types or proposed developments /redevelopments. Action G.1: Include a review of this Plan as part of the normal zoning and planning review process. Who: City Staff Cooperators: Consultant Time Frame: Ongoing, as needed Estimated Cost: $500 each review Goal Achieved: Goal 4: Continue to collect data to support wellhead and source water protection How: Copies of this Plan will be distributed to City planning staff. The DWSMA shall be considered during the review process, especially within the moderately vulnerable section of the DWSMA and with those uses involving potential City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 33 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 contaminants (industrial) H. IMPLEMENTATION Objective H.1: Track and report completed WHP activities. LGU Review Action H.1: Utilize the 3 -ring binder developed as part of this Plan to keep track of and organize WHP efforts. Who: City Cooperators: MDH, Consultant Time Frame: Every year Estimated Cost: No additional cost Goal Achieved: Goal 4: Continue to collect data to support wellhead and source water protection How: On a yearly basis, update the WHP binder to include those WHP items that have been completed. Share results of the binder update with City staff. 1. EVALUATION Objective 1.1: Evaluate Plan Action 1.1: Complete an evaluation report every two and one -half years. Who: City Staff Cooperators: Consultant Time Frame: Every two and one -half years Estimated Cost: $2,000 per evaluation Goal Achieved: Goal 1: Work to maintain or improve the current level of water quality; Goal 2: Work to continue to supply sufficient water quantity; Goal 3: Provide and promote activities that protect the source water aquifer How: Prepare a written evaluation using the MDH WHP Program Evaluation form or a format selected by the City. Provide report to the MDH Source Water Protection Unit. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 34 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 LGU Review CHAPTER SIX EVALUATION PROGRAM (4720.5270) The success of the Plan must be evaluated in order to determine whether the implementation activities are accomplishing the intent of the Plan. Monitoring will be ongoing and a written evaluation of the Plan and associated activities will be conducted every two and a half years that the Plan is in effect. The evaluation activities will include the following items: • Track the implementation of the goals, objectives, activities, and tasks discussed in Chapter Five of this Plan; • Determine the effectiveness of specific management strategies regarding the protection of City's municipal water supply; • Identify possible changes to these strategies which may improve their effectiveness; and • Determine the adequacy of financial resources and staff availability to carry out the management strategies planned for each year. The City will continue to coordinate with the MDH in the annual monitoring of the City's municipal water supply to determine if the management strategies presented in this Plan are having an impact on water quality. At the end of each evaluation period (every two and a half years) City Staff will make a written report regarding progress in implementing the Plan, as well as an evaluation of the costs and benefits of the Plan activities. This report may be completed using the MDH Wellhead Protection Program Evaluation form. A copy of the report will be sent to the MDH Source Water Protection Unit in St. Paul. The City will also keep a copy of the report in its records. The intent of the evaluation is to compile a complete and comprehensive study of the implementation of the source management strategies for use when the City updates or revises this Plan. As required by the Wellhead Protection Rules, this Plan will be amended every 10 years at a minimum. r, City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 35 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 CHAPTER SEVEN ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY CONTINGENCY STRATEGY (4720.5280) LGU Review A contingency plan is put into effect to establish, provide, and keep updated certain emergency response procedures and information for the public water supply, which may become vital in the event of a partial or total loss of public water supply services as a result of a natural disaster, chemical contamination, civil disorder, or human - caused disruption. In March of 2011, the City completed its Water Emergency and Conservation Plan. As required, the plan was submitted to the DNR Waters -Water Permit Programs for review and approval. The plan has been adopted by the City. Copies of the Water Emergency and Conservation Plan are available from the City. City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 Page 36 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 Appendix A - Tables City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 LGU Review Table 1- Potential Contaminant Source Inventory ID MPCA ID NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE 0 17297 Moon Motorsports 414 Highway 25 S Monticello 55362 1 18780 Fred's Auto Repair 349 Broadway St W Monticello 55362 2 8073 Riverside Oil 313 W 5th St Monticello 55362 3 12069 Cornerstone Chevrolet - Monticello 1005 Highway 25 S Monticello 55362 4 6308 West Metro Buick Pontiac GMC 1001 Highway 25 S Monticello 55362 5 8074 JM Oil Co Inc - Monticello 203 W 5th St Monticello 55362 6 16712 Former Ruffs Auto 701 Elm St Monticello 55362 7 3485 D & D Bus Service Inc 3887 Chelsea Rd W Monticello 55362 8 7310 Holiday Stationstore #196 123 W 7th St Monticello 55362 9 123251 Kwik Trip 345 9440 State Highway 25 Monticello 55362 10 11705 Total Q Midwest Inc 1200 Highway 25 S Monticello 55362 11 8526 Royal Tire of Monticello 1280 Cedar St Monticello 55362 12 12470 Monticello Community Center 5th St & Maple St Monticello 55362 13 14780 Cargill Kitchen Solutions 206 W 4th St Monticello 55362 14 8079 Monticello Fire Hall 303 6th St W Monticello 55362 15 1951 Cornerstone Chevrolet 3939 Chelsea Rd W Monticello 55362 16 12061 Cornerstone Chevrolet 3939 Chelsea Rd W Monticello 55362 17 16209 State Special Waste Facility 901 Golf Course Rd Monticello 55362 18 125870 Fred's Auto Repair 349 Broadway St W Monticello 55362 19 53292 Riverside Oil 313 W 5th St Monticello 55362 20 50382 JM Oil Co Inc - Monticello 203 W 5th St Monticello 55362 21 12081 Holiday Stationstore #196 123 W 7th St Monticello 55362 22 21056 Monticello Community Center 5th St & Maple St Monticello 55362 23 11247 Total Q Midwest Inc 1200 Highway 25 S Monticello 55362 ACTIVITY STATUS VULNERABILITY PARCEL ID NUMBER MATERIAL CODE FACILITY CODE Leak Site Active Moderate 155019016010 SPL 2100 Leak Site Active Moderate 155010050011 LUST 2110 -01 Leak Site Active Moderate 155010012060 SPL 3000 Tank Site Active Moderate 155217001020 AST -F000 2110 Leak Site Inactive Moderate 155217001010 SPL 2110 Leak Site Inactive Moderate 155010012060 SPL 3000 Leak Site Inactive Moderate 155500101418 SPL 2110 Petroleum Inactive Moderate 155225001010 PCS -BMS 4000 Brownfield Leak Site Active Moderate 155010005010 LUST 2116 Tank Site Inactive Moderate 155150001010 AST -F000 2116 Leak Site Active Moderate 155500142204 LUST 2100 Leak Site Active Moderate 155032001050 SPL 2110 -01 Leak Site Inactive Moderate 155010 LUST 5000 Tank Site Active Moderate 155010018080 AST -0000 3000 Leak Site Inactive Moderate 155010012020 SPL 6000 Leak Site Active Moderate 155184001010 LUST 2110 Tank Site Active Moderate 155184001010 UST F000 2110 Tank Site Active Moderate 155500101106 AST -F000 4346 Tank Site Active Moderate 155010050011 UST -F000 2110 -01 Tank Site Active Moderate 155010012060 AST -F000 3000 Tank Site Inactive Moderate 155010012060 AST -F000 3000 Tank Site Active Moderate 155010005010 UST -F000 2116 Tank Site Inactive Moderate 155010 UST -F000 5000 Tank Site Active Moderate 155500142204 UST -F000 2100 Table 2a - Public Wells UNIQUE NUMBER WELLNAME STATUS CODE USE CODE VULNERABILITY CITY ZIP CODE PARCEL ADDRESS PCSI ID FACILITY CODE TOTAL 00218032 MONTICELLO1 A PC Low MONTICELLO 55362 155010034101 1 6000 1 00236578 MONTICELLO 2 A PC Low MONTICELLO 55362 155010034040 119 3rd St East 2 6000 1 00439866 MONTICELLO 3 A PC Low MONTICELLO 55362 155018001050 203 Chelsea Rd 3 6000 1 00449182 MONTICELLO 4 A PC Low MONTICELLO 55362 155018003040 4 6000 1 00694202 MONTICELLO 5 A PC Moderate MONTICELLO 55362 155015037010 405 Ramsey St 5 6000 1 Table 2b - Private Wells in DWSMA UNIQUE NUMBER WELLNAME STATUSCODE USECODE VULNERABILITY PARCEL TPName CITY ZIPCODE PCS_Materi FACILITY CODE ADDRESS 00180716 MANKE A DO Low 10- 335 -1355 HANSEN, DENNY& CHERNEY, TRACY BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100 -01 20301 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00453072 HOLTHAUS, DANIEL A DO Low 213100223113 CAROL A ROSSINI MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 1000 350385TH ST NE 00415135 MONTICELLO TW -2 A TW Low 155018001020 CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 3000 00166962 GALNELIUS, BRUCE A DO Moderate 10- 335 -2160 EVERETT, WILLIAM L BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1000 20567187TH AVE NW 00416777 HANSON, DON A DO Low 10- 335 -1340 HANSON, SYLVIA K BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1000 20271 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00126659 ROADFELDT, CLARENCE A DO Low 10- 335 -1335 ROADFELDT, NORAMAE BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1000 20243 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00415134 MONTICELLO TH -1 A TW Low 155018001020 CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 3000 00149655 PEARSON, ANDREA A DO Moderate 10- 335 -1321 HANNULA, DAVID L & PATRICIA A BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1000 20169 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00178200 MONTICELLO A DO Moderate 155018001050 CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 3000 203 CHELSEA RD 00504022 CLARK, WILLARD A DO Moderate 30- 335 -2160 EVERETT, WILLIAM L BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100 -03 20567187TH AVE NW 00669968 CITY OF MONTICELLO A MW Moderate 155015037010 CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 1100 -03 405 RAMSEY ST 00214558 MOREY, WAYNE A IR Moderate WEL 00661586 A DO Low 155500152101 G & R SCHLUENDER PROP INC MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 9000 333190TH ST NE 00718907 HOGLUND, STUART A DO Low 155144001100 AUDREY A HOGLUND MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 1000 200 FRONT ST 00504086 CARDINAL, DAYRL A DO Moderate 213100154405 DARYLJ& MICHELEA CARDINAL MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 1100 -03 9187 STATE HWY 25 NE 00438140 MAUS, DON A DO Moderate 155010046090 DONALD MAUS MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 1100 -01 706 RIVER ST 00468201 GENUNG, TIM A DO Low 155500104100 TIMOTHY H & JOYCE C GENUNG MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 1000 907 ELM ST 00228762 LAND O'LAKES CREAMERY A CO Moderate 155010018080 WRIGHT CO PRODUCTS INC MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 3000 2064TH ST 00228761 GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY I CO Moderate 155010013010 CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 3000 505 WALNUT ST 00665716 THEIN, ROBERT A IR Moderate 155018003012 THEIN III INC MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 3000 102 DUNDAS RD 00676521 VEIT A EL Moderate 155029001041 SILVERCREST APARTMENTS LLC MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 1100 -02 3077TH ST 00184701 KJELLBERG, KENT A IR Low 155207001010 WAL -MART REAL EST BUSINESS TR MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 2000 9320 CEDAR ST 00472289 PAUMEN, RICHARD A DO Low 213100224203 DAVID E PETERSON MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 9000 36918TH ST NE 00594822 VECHES, DAYLE A DO Moderate 213100152207 FRANCIS W &JOYCE A DUBAY MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 1100 -01 307490TH ST NE 00456936 FULLER, RAY A IR Low 213100103300 DAVID D & MARY M SPIKE MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 9000 00602812 PFIEFFER, RAY A DO Low 213100224200 WILLIAM 1 & LISA A KEENAN MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 1000 8270 STATE HWY 25 NE 00421130 FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER A DO Low 155010067060 CITY OF MONTICELLO EDA MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 2000 249 BROADWAY 00724353 HUNTER, DAN A IR Moderate 10- 405 -0121 HUNTER, DONALD & IDONNA BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100 -01 20011 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00724373 ANDREWS, STEVE A DO Moderate 30 405 -0110 ANDREWS, STEVEN R & MARY S BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100 -01 20015 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00502570 STUMP, CLIFFORD A DO Moderate 10- 405 -0090 EXSTED, STEVEN T & MOLLY E BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100 -01 20079 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00724221 A DO Moderate 30- 405 -0050 PEMBERTON, DALE C & BECKY L BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100.01 20115 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00610539 ZIEBARTH A DO Moderate 30- 405 -0010 KRINKE, WADE H & ZIEBARTH, MAR BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100 -03 20131 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00580312 GRAHAM, LARRY A DO Moderate 30- 335 -1321 HANNULA, DAVID L & PATRICIAA BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100 -01 20169 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00574049 BRINK, JAY A DO Low 10- 335 -1325 NEUMAN, JAMES BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1000 20221 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00502988 KELLOR, MERLE A DO Low 10- 335 -1348 HERMES, RALPH A -TRUST BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1000 20329 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW 00635349 A DO Moderate 10- 498 -0402 FARNICK, JEFFREY W & SANDRA BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100 -01 20691187TH AVE NW 00627513 A DO Moderate 30 498 -0401 GREEN, MICHAEL & KARI R BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100 -01 20695187TH AVE NW 00743159 BROWN, DAVE A DO Moderate 30- 335 -2111 BROWN, DAVID A &ANNETTEI BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1300 -01 20725187TH AVE NW 00743128 ECKHART, RHONDA A DO Moderate 30- 335 -2215 ECKHART, DANIELT & RHONDAJ BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100.01 20745187TH AVE NW 00704128 SMALLWOOD, DWAYNE A DO Moderate 30- 335 -2008 HEDTKE - WEBER, BRIANA M BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100 -03 20761187TH AVE NW 00439857 MONTICELLO TW -3 A TW Low 155018001050 CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 3000 203 CHELSEA RD 00439858 MONTICELLO TW -4 A TW Low 155018003040 CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 3000 00642703 POIRIER, TONY A DO Moderate 10- 335 -2150 BIG LAKE 55309 WEL 1100 -03 20595187TH AVE NW 00548163 MW A MW Moderate 155010013090 MINNESOTA STATE ARM BLDG COMM MONTICELLO 55309 WEL 6000 00589304 MW -1 A MW Moderate 155010012020 CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 6000 3036TH ST 00772743 CITY OF MONTICELLO A OT Moderate 155500101100 CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 1100 -01 901 GOLF COURSE RD 00218034 WAYNE MOREY A IR Moderate 213100221100 CHESTER G& POLLY A AUGUSTSON MONTICELLO 55362 WEL 110D -01 8817 STATE HWY 25 NE Table 3 - Sealed Wells in DWSMA FID UNIQUE NUMBER WELLNAME STATUS CODE USE CODE VULNERABILITY PARCEL CITY ZIP CODE 3 00248357 GOULD BROTHERS CHEVROLET 1 SEALED H0201090 S AB Moderate 155184001010 MONTICELLO 55362 9 00244625 USGS H. SAYER S AB Moderate 213100152203 MONTICELLO 55362 17 00642970 MW -2 S AB Low 155010050100 MONTICELLO 55362 18 00642971 MW -3 5 AB Low 155010051130 MONTICELLO 55362 21 00482878 GROVE NURSERY CENTER 5 AB Moderate 155125000040 MONTICELLO 55362 24 00642969 MW -1 S AB Low 155010 MONTICELLO 55362 51 00548161 MW S AB Moderate 155010018010 MONTICELLO 55362 53 00273279 PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY S AB Moderate 155500101104 MONTICELLO 55362 Table 4- Previously Unlocated Wells UNIQUE ID WELLNAME STATUS CODE USE CODE VULNERABILITY PARCEL TPName CITY NAME POSTAL CODE COMMENT ADDRESS MATERIAL CODE FACILITY CODE TOTAL 00126690 SANDBERG, JOHN A DO Moderate 155224000130 MENTH PROPERTIES LLC MONTICELLO 55362 City believes well was sealed before 1993 1117 CEDAR ST STE 130 WEL 2000 1 00165991 STRAW, DARWIN A DO Moderate 155010010010 MITCHELL FAMILY TRUST MONTICELLO 55362 Needs to be sealed 5136TH ST WEL 1000. 1 00178725 KLINE, CHRISTOPHER A DO Moderate 155093000020 KLEIN FARMS ESTATES ASSOC MONTICELLO 55362 City said was sealed by Traut around 1994 4879 STONERIDGE LN WEL 1000 -01 1 00247602 KIELLBERG'S INC A UN Low 155500154402 KIELLBERG'S INC MONTICELLO 55362 pump has been pulled and well has been capped. 9127 STATE HWY 25 NE WEL 1000 1 00107208 BONDHUS, DICK A DO Low 213113001040 JOHN CHADWICK FARMS LLC MONTICELLO 55362 still active 10050 DARROW AVE NE WEL 1000 1 00186919 BONDHUS, DICK A DO Low 213113001080 JOHN CHADWICK FARMS LLC MONTICELLO 55362 still active 7134TH ST W WEL 6000 1 00192951 BRINK, WESLEY A IR Low 10- 335 -1347 HERMES, RALPH A -TRUST BIG LAKE 55309 In Sherburn County 20329 COUNTY ROAD 14 NW WEL 1000 1 00152384 HASKINS, DAVE A DO Moderate 155018002013 CHINOS EQUITIES LLC MONTICELLO 55362 well is inactive 1248 EDMONSON AVE NE WEL 2000 1 00197307 ROLLING WHEELS INC. A DO Low 155500104200 JOHN CHADWICK FARMS LLC MONTICELLO 55362 well is inactive 1101 ELM ST WEL 2000 1 00429329 TWIN CITY TESTING A DW Low 155010065031 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT MONTICELLO 55362 City believes they are sealed WEL 4000 1 00504412 BONDHUS, DICK & LINDA A DO Low 213113001050 LINDA & MARK BECKER MONTICELLO 55362 Still active 10068 DARROW AVE NE WEL 1000 1 00523234 NEU, KENNETH A DO Low 155500141300 PATRICK M GARVEY REV TRUST MONTICELLO 55362 Still Active 1148 EDMONSON AVE NE WEL 1000 1 00642723 MONTICELLO TW A MW Low 155018003040 210 DUNDAS LLC MONTICELLO 55362 City Test Well 210 DUNDAS RD WEL 6000 1 00796413 PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY A IR Moderate 155500101104 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 882 MONTICELLO 55362 Located by City WEL 6000 1 Table 5 - Remaining Unlocated Wells UNIQUE STATUS NUMBER WELLNAME CODE USE CODE COMMENT 00178953 VANERP, HANK A DO City could not locate 00237194 DYCON A DO MDH information does not match well address 00240111 A -232 A TW City could not locate 00548162 MW A MW City believes it was sealed and is under Community Center parking lot 00143668 THE GLASS HUT A DO Well not found, business hooked up w/ city water 00158625 KRENGEL, KENNETH A DO City can not locate Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 Appendix B - Figures City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 LGU Review QDWSMA — City Boundary Moderate Vulnerabiltiy Low Vulnerabilby City Wells CITY OF N�ontice o 39 V I k, v' I I ' I I J L_ _ 0 o Z N 3 g MONTICELLO 1 !J� MONTICELLO 2 7 r MONTICELLO 5 MONTICELLO 3 JIMINNESOU -- -- `��� • I' \ \ MONTICELLO 4 - - -� I ! l � I - - - - -- � - - - -- � ll ill I I ' I -------- - - - - -, a I I � 0 2,500 Feet Figure 1: DWSMA Location and Vulnerability AL Wellhead Protection Plan City of Monticello di Assocrulcs. Inc, DWSMA City Boundary 100 Year Floodplain 0 City Wells mil ` [ ITYOF Monticello) 94' if I I I � � i FA 000�`� -4,- _ o 0 0 MONTICELLO 1' MONTICELLO MONTICELLO 5 MONTICELLO 3 WXXFSOTA�1 ! • MONTICELLO 4 I I Figure 2: Floodplain Wellhead Protection Plan City of Monticello 0 N 3 is IF 39 �8 I �I --- ------ -- ---- -- - -- -- -- i- I - - - -- — J I � 0 2,500 Feet A 1A/CAD & Assocratrs. Lna 94 y � J. I I I r- I I 1 iI I � I 1 DWSMA - - - -- City Boundary I mil ` [ ITY OF Montice o C � I i i i — — I f `7� Figure 3: Parcels Wellhead Protection Plan City of Monticello 0 N -s 39 � n ®� 18 - -- I -------------- � I I I � 0 2,500 Feet & Assvciuws. Mr- DWSMA - - -- City Boundary Agricultural Commercial Golf Course Industrial and Utility Institutional and School Parks and Public Land L� Right of Way _ Railroad - Manufactured Housing Park Multi - Family Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Attached Undeveloped !r rriry OF Monticdo I I I I � :f -J I Figure 4: Existing Land Use Wellhead Protection Plan City of Monticello s. 39 JT �8 I I ------------ I I 0 2,500 Feet A W.V? & ZISSOca ws. inc. I -ROAD I I DWSMA I , City Boundary Agriculture - Open Space Single Family Residential Single Family and 2 Family Residential Residential Planned Unit Development Medium Density Residential Mobile Home District Neighborhood Business Limited Business Highway Business — Regional Business - Central Community District Industrial and Business Campus District _ Light Industrial — Heavy Industrial Planned Unit Development ROW - Special Use District C'1TY OF i� 1111 ► onti6eflo I I -_J OR \7 N I� 1 Figure 5: Current Zoning Map Wellhead Protection Plan City of Monticello i I� 39 - -- - - - 0 2,500 Feet J& WSB & rlssocinits, Inc. DWSMA City Boundary Storm Sewer CITY OF Mo4fAo Figure 6: Storm Sewer System Wellhead Protection Plan City of Monticello ZTJ7 c- 18 579 2- 2,500 A WSB & Associates. Ina 0 o 8 '3 6 T 39 M �- I I� L - -_ QDWSMA Sanitary Sewer City Boundary CITY OF Monticdo + i o° N I j I Figure 7: Sanitary Sewer System Wellhead Protection Plan City of Monticello 0 I I I I I � ' 0 2,500 Feet A � .�lssaci�xn °s, Ines. it 94 ` r ' I, • NTICELLO MONTICELLO 3 MONTICELLO 4 { YIXNESOiA i DWSMA I � _ City Wells 1 Water Mains City Boundary _ J t CITY OF Figure 8: Public Water Supply System i�oi7t1C�' o Wellhead Protection Plan City of Monticello � ss� � Ssi k a -- WIA A 0 o N 3 i & Assaetates. �+ �I PCSI Water Hazardous Waste A Tanks and Leaks Multiple Activities DWSMA City Boundary Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability = o / G ■� nn G ■ ■ ti A ■ - ■ - - -, o ■ ��- 16 ■ ' ■ <- rz_ a Q A I- - E A I 0 0 N 3 s � 071 � -w� 39 '` TrLo3 =5= 1 � 18 I ULY f1 // II II II i�1� J CITY OF Figure 9: Potential Contaminant Source Inventory Mon7t1CeRal Wellhead Protection Plan City of Monticello 0 2,500 Feet A, WSB DWSMA -- City Boundary Private Wells Public Wells CITY OF 0 I o \o Afth I I r- I I I ! � I 1 0 i mxxewie� O 0 0 '�. 0 I Figure 10: Wells Wellhead Protection Plan City of Monticello 0 N 3 ss� 72 1 u r I 18 I I --- -- -- I -- -- -- I � I � I 0 2,500 Feet A !A/CAD & Assvcrales. Inc, Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 Appendix C - Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 LGU Review Amendment to the Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 Delineation of Wellhead Protection Area, Drinking Water Supply Management Area, and Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability Assessment January 2015 Prepared for The City of Monticello U Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. Table of Contents Page Glossaryof Terms ..................................................................................................................... ............................... i Acronyms................................................................................................................................. ............................... ii 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... ............................... 1 2. Assessment of the Data Elements ........................................................................ ............................... 2 3. General Descriptions ........................................................................................... ............................... 4 7 3.1 Description of the Water Supply System .................................................... ............................... 4 3.2 Description of the Hydrogeologic Setting .................................................. ............................... 4 4. Delineation of the Wellhead Protection Area ...................................................... ............................... 6 4.1 Delineation Criteria .................................................................................... ............................... 6 4.2 Method Used to Delineate the Wellhead Protection Area .......................... ............................... 9 4.2.1. Porous Media Delineations ............................................................. ............................... 9 4.3 Results of Model Calibration and Sensitivity Analysis ............................ ............................... 10 4.3.1. Calibration .................................................................................... ............................... 11 4.3.2. Sensitivity Analysis ...................................................................... ............................... 11 4.4 Addressing Model Uncertainty ................................................................... .............................12 5. Delineation of the Drinking Water Supply Management Area ......................... ............................... 12 6. Vulnerability Assessments ................................................................................. ............................... 13 6.1 Assessment of Well Sensitivity .................................................................. .............................13 6.2 Assessment of Well Vulnerability .............................................................. .............................13 6.3 Assessment of the Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability ......................... 14 7. Comparing Original Part 1 to Amended Part 1 ................................................. ............................... 14 8. Recommendations ................................................................................................ .............................14 9. References ............................................................................................................ .............................15 List of Tables Table 1: Water Supply Well Information ........................................................................... ............................... 2 Table 2: Assessment of Data Elements ............................................................................... ............................... 2 Table 3: Description of the Hydrogeologic Setting at Wells No. 1, 2, 4 and 5 .................. ............................... 5 Table 4: Description of the Hydrogeologic Setting at Well No. 3 ...................................... ............................... 6 Table 5: Description of WHPA Delineation Criteria .......................................................... ............................... 7 Table 6: Annual Volume of Water Discharged from Water Supply Wells ........................ ............................... 8 Table of Contents - Continued List of Figures Figure 1: Site Location, High Capacity Wells, and Model Domain Figure 2: QBAA Groundwater Elevation Contours Figure 3: Bedrock Aquifer Groundwater Elevation Contours Figure 4: Hydrogeologic Cross Section Locations and Bedrock Geology Figure 5: Hydrogeologic Cross Section A -A' Figure 6: Hydrogeologic Cross Section B -B Figure 7: Model Domain, Calibration Locations, and Modification Areas Figure 8: Model Calibration Figure 9: Simulated Groundwater Equipotential Contours Figure 10: 1 -, 5 -, and 10 -Year Flowpaths for Calibrated Model Figure 11: Uncertainty Analysis Figure 12: Combined Wellhead Protection Area Boundaries and Drinking Water Supply Management Area Figure 13: Drinking Water Supply Management Area Geologic Sensitivity Assessment Figure 14: Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability Assessment Figure 15: Original and Amended Wellhead Protection Areas List of Appendices Appendix A: Other High Capacity Wells Included in Model 1 Glossary of Terms Data Element. A specific type of information required by the Minnesota Department of Health to prepare a Wellhead Protection Plan. Drinking Water Supply Management Area ( DWSMA). The area delineated using identifiable land marks that reflects the scientifically calculated wellhead protection area boundaries as closely as possible (Minnesota Rules, part 4720.5 100, subpart 13). Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability. An assessment of the likelihood that the aquifer within the DWSMA is subject to impact from land and water uses within the wellhead protection area. It is based upon criteria that are specified under Minnesota Rules, part 4720.52 10, subpart 3. Emergency Response Area (ERA). The part of the wellhead protection area that is defined by a one - year time of travel within the aquifer that is used by the public water supply well (Minnesota Rules, part 4720.5250, subpart 3). It is used to set priorities for managing potential contamination sources within the DWSMA. Inner Wellhead Management Zone (IWMZ). The land that is within 200 feet of a public water supply well (Minnesota Rules, part 4720.5 100, subpart 19). The public water supplier must manage the IWMZ to help protect it from sources of pathogen or chemical contamination that may cause an acute health effect. Wellhead Protection (WHP). A method of preventing well contamination by effectively managing potential contamination sources in all or a portion of the well's recharge area. Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA). The surface and subsurface area surrounding a well or well field that supplies a public water system, through which contaminants are likely to move toward and reach the well or well field (Minnesota Statutes, part 103I.005, subdivision 24). Well Vulnerability. An assessment of the likelihood that a well is at risk to human - caused contamination, either due to its construction or indicated by criteria that are specified under Minnesota Rules, part 4720.5550, subpart 2. 11 Acronyms ATP - Aquifer Test Plan CFR - Calculated Fixed Radius CWl - County Well Index DNR - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources EPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency FSA - Farm Security Administration MDA - Minnesota Department of Agriculture MDH - Minnesota Department of Health MGS - Minnesota Geological Survey MnDOT - Minnesota Department of Transportation MnGEO - Minnesota Geospatial Information Office MPCA - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency NRCS - Natural Resource Conservation Service SWCD - Soil and Water Conservation District SWUDS — State Water Use Database System UGE - Upgradient Extensions UMN - University of Minnesota USDA - United States Department of Agriculture USGS - United States Geological Survey 1. Introduction Leggette, Brashears and Graham, Inc. (LBG) has developed Part 1 of the Wellhead Protection (WHP) Plan for the City of Monticello (City) (public water supply identification number 1860012). The work was performed in accordance with the Minnesota Wellhead Protection Rule (MR), parts 4720.5100 to 4720.5590. The City's existing WHP Plan, dated January, 2004 is being amended now because ten years have expired since the approval of its last WHP Plan. The results of the development of this amended WHP Plan are presented in the text below, on Tables 1 through 6, Figures 1 through 15, and in Appendix A, which are listed in the Table of Contents. This report presents delineations of the wellhead protection area (WHPA) and drinking water supply management area (DWSMA), and the vulnerability assessments for the public water supply well and DWSMA. Figure 12 shows the boundaries of the WHPA and the DWSMA. These are based on a WHPA that is defined by a 10 -year time of travel. Figure 12 also shows the emergency response areas (ERAs), which are defined by a 1 -year time of travel. This report also lists the technical information that was used to prepare this portion of the WHP Plan in accordance with the MR. Information pertaining to the Aquifer Test Plan (ATP) and the well vulnerability sheets can be obtained from the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). The City Wells included in the WHP Plan are listed in Table 1. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. 2 Table 1 - Water Supply Well Information City of Monticello Local Present and Future Casing Casing Well Date Unique �. Data Source Data Element 1., Well �, Well (See Selected References for Type Diameter Depth Depth Constructed / Numbered Citations) Aquifer 3 Number Vulnerability Name Precipitation (inches) (feet) (feet) Reconstructed MN Climatology Working Group, City Geology Well 218032 Primary 16 240 260 1964 Vulnerable QBAA No. I Subsurface data H H H H MGS, 2000 and 2013, CWI Well 236578 Primary 20xl6 226 250 1970 Vulnerable QBAA No. 2 H None Available Maps and soil descriptions M H H H NRCS Well 439866 Primary 24x18 224 310 1988 Vulnerable Mt. Simon No. 3 L L DNR, National Hydrography Dataset Well 449182 Primary 24x18 176 220 1988 Vulnerable QBAA No. 4 Well 694202 Primary 24x18 100 150 2003 Vulnerable QBAA No. 5 2. Assessment of the Data Elements Table 2 presents the assessment of the data elements as outlined in the MDH's scoping letter relative to the present and future implications of planning items that are specified in MR, part 4720.5210. Table 2 - Assessment of Data Elements LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Present and Future Implications �. Data Source Data Element 1., � �, (See Selected References for b Numbered Citations) 3 Precipitation H H H H MN Climatology Working Group, City Geology Maps and geologic H H H H MGS, 2000 and 2013, CWI descriptions Subsurface data H H H H MGS, 2000 and 2013, CWI Borehole geophysics H H H H MGS Surface geophysics H H H H None Available Maps and soil descriptions M H H H NRCS Water Resources Watershed units L M L M National Hydrography Dataset (USGS) List of public waters L H L L DNR, National Hydrography Dataset USGS Land Use Parcel boundaries map L I L L I L Wright County GIS Data LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Definitions Used for Assessing Data Elements: High (H) — The element has a direct impact. Moderate (M) — The element has an indirect or marginal impact. Low (L) — The element has little if any impact. Shaded — The element was not required by MDH for preparing the WHP Part 1 Plan. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Present and Future Implications Data Source Data Element ° 4. (See Selected References for Numbered Citations) Political boundaries map L H L L ESRI Data PLS map L H L L ESRI Data Public Utility Services Transportation routes and L M M M ESRI corridors Storm/sanitary sewers and M L L City, County PWS system map Public drainage systems map L L ESRI Data or list Records of well construction, H H H H City, CWI, MDH Files maintenance, and use Surface Water Quantity Stream flow data M H M USGS, DNR, Metropolitan Council Ordinary high water mark L L FEMA, DNR data Permitted withdrawals L L DNR Protected levels /flows L L DNR Water use conflicts L L DNR Groundwater Quantity Permitted withdrawals H H H H DNR Groundwater use conflicts H H H H DNR Water levels H H H H DNR, MPCA, MDH, City Surface Water Quality Monitoring data summary L M I I I MDH, MPCA, MDA, DNR, City Groundwater Quality Monitoring data H H H H MPCA, MDH, USGS Isotopic data H H H H MPCA, MDH. USGS, UMN Tracer studies H H H H None Available Contamination site data H H H M City, MPCA and MDA MPCA and MDA H H H MPCA and MDA spills /release reports Definitions Used for Assessing Data Elements: High (H) — The element has a direct impact. Moderate (M) — The element has an indirect or marginal impact. Low (L) — The element has little if any impact. Shaded — The element was not required by MDH for preparing the WHP Part 1 Plan. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. rd 3. General Descriptions 3.1 Description of the Water Supply System The City, shown on Figure 1, obtains its drinking water supply from five primary wells, City Wells No. 1 through 5. The wells are shown on Figure 1 and Table 1 summarizes information regarding them. 3.2 Description of the Hydrogeologic Setting The hydrologic setting for the Mt. Simon Sandstone aquifer is described in the previous Part 1 WflP Plan. A summary of the hydrologic conditions at the City Wells is presented in Table 3. The geology in the vicinity of the City consists of Quaternary -age glacial and post - glacial deposits that are underlain by Cambrian -aged bedrock. Terrace deposits composed primarily of outwash sand and gravel are predominant throughout the study area as seen in cross - section on Figures 5 and 6. These sand deposits overlie glacial till deposits. While the till does appear to be present over much of the area of the study, there does appear to be an area around City Wells No. 1 and 2 and extending to the north where the outwash is found from the surface to the bedrock as shown on Figure 5. There is also a layer of outwash found beneath the till both southeast and northwest of the City Wells. This layer is absent south of the City where the unconsolidated material is primarily till from the surface to bedrock. A narrow, buried, bedrock valley is present in the area of the City Wells. The valley trends north to south and encompasses City Wells No. 1, 2 and 4 and is immediately west of Wells No. 3 and 5. This valley extends down to the Red Clastics Bedrock layer, below the Mt. Simon Sandstone. City Well No. 3 is completed in this layer as well as a small "island" of Mt. Simon Sandstone. Across a fault south of the City Wells the bedrock layers are off -set by approximately 50 ft (15 m) with the layers on the north side of the southwest - northeast trending fault being uplifted relative to the layers to the south. As a result, the Eau Claire confining unit is present south of the fault and largely absent north of it, as seen on Figure 5. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Table 3 - Description of the Hydrogeologic Setting at Wells No. 1, 2, 4 and 5 Aquifer Attribute Descriptor Data Source Aquifer Material Sand and Gravel City Well Logs Primary Porosity 0.25 Typical of aquifer material. Aquifer Thickness 53 -200ft City Well Logs Stratigraphic Top 729 -889 feet MSL City Well Logs Elevation Stratigraphic Bottom Elevation 666 -781 feet MSL City Well Logs Hydraulic Confinement Confined City Well Logs Unconsolidated The reference value for the (QBAA) Reference Vazue/Range transmissivity of the QBAA Transmissivity (T) 35,694 ft /day 2 (15,470 — 195,160 ft /day) Aquifer was determined from a pumping test conducted at City Well No. 5 (649202) in 2003. Hydraulic Reference Value /Range : See above. Range also based on 150 ft /day specific capacity data from local Conductivity (K) (65 — 820 ft/day) wells. Measured from model results. Groundwater Flow Flow to the east and north (slightly Flow generally to northeast Field variable) toward Mississippi River with Hydraulic Gradient: 1.3 x 10-' some trending southeast close to the river. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Aquifer Mt. Simon (CMTS) Table 4 - Description of the Hydrogeologic Setting at Well No. 3 Attribute Descriptor Data Source Aquifer Material Sandstone City Well Logs Primary Porosity 0.2 Recommended by MDH Aquifer Thickness 89 ft City Well No 3 Log Stratigraphic Top 734 feet MSL City Well No 3 Log Elevation Stratigraphic Bottom Elevation 645 feet MSL City Well No 3 Log Hydraulic Confinement Confined City Well No 3 Log The reference value for the transmissivity of the Mt. Simon Reference Value/Range Aquifer was estimated from a Transmissivity (T) 12,224 f12/day � pumping test conducted at City of (5,433 24,902 ft/day) Big Lake Wells in 1993 and 2001 as well as estimates from specific capacity data from local wells. See above. Range is slightly Reference Value /Range : higher than ATP values due to the Hydraulic 89 ft /day likely highly weathered Conductivity (K) (39 —180 ft/day) composition of the Mt. Simon containing City Well No. 3. Measured from model results. Groundwater Flow Flow to the east and north (slightly Flow generally to northeast Field variable) toward Mississippi River with Hydraulic Gradient: 1.3 x 10-3 some trending southeast close to the river. 4. Delineation of the Wellhead Protection Area 4.1 Delineation Criteria The boundaries of the WHPA for the City are shown in Figure 12. Table 4 provides descriptions of how the delineation criteria that are specified under MR, part 4720.5510 were included in the model. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Table 5 - Description of WHPA Delineation Criteria Criterion Descriptor How the Criterion was Addressed The rivers provide boundary conditions within the Flow Boundary Mississippi and Elk regional model north of the City. They are included Rivers in the local model and help set the local groundwater flow. The pumping amounts were determined based on Flow Boundary Other High - Capacity the averaged 2008 -2012 pumped volumes. The Wells (Appendix A) pumping amounts of these high - capacity wells were included in the methods used for the delineation. Pumping information was obtained from the Daily Volume of Water Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Pumped See Table 6 Appropriations Permit 1964 -1059. The annual pumped volumes were converted to a daily volume pumped by a well. The model calibration process addressed the Groundwater Flow Field See Figures 3 and 9 relationship between the calculated versus observed groundwater flow field. Reference Value/Range Aquifer Transmissivity 35,694 ft2 /day — QBAA See Tables 3 and 4. 12,224 ft2 /day - CMTS Time of Travel 10 years The public water supplier selected a 10 -year time of travel. Information provided by the City and from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) SWUDS database were used to identify the maximum volume of water pumped annually by each well over the previous five -year period. The volumes pumped from the wells over previous five years and the rates used in the delineation are summarized in Table 6. The total volume illustrated in Table 6 (754.5 MGY) is approximately 15% greater than the highest single -year demand over the period of record (659 MGY in 2009), indicating a conservative delineation volume. The daily volume of discharge used as an input parameter in the model was calculated by dividing the annual withdrawal volume by 365 days. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Table 6 - Annual Volume of Water Discharged from Water Supply Wells Well Name Unique Number Total Annual Withdrawal (million gallons /year[MGY]) Maximum Withdrawal Y) - 2013 (MGY) 5 -Year Projected Value (MGY)* Withdrawal used in Current WHP Plan (MGY) Withdrawal used in Current WHP Plan (Gal /Day) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Well No. 1 218032 142.1 130.1 148.6 130.8 149.3 149.3 168.3 168.3 461,095.9 Well No. 2 236578 146.7 150.3 127.5 151.8 113.9 151.8 165.7 165.7 453,972.6 Well No. 3 439866 60.3 63.4 70.3 57.8 67.7 70.3 77.3 77.3 211,780.8 Well No. 4 449182 143.0 123.3 70.3 129.0 68.7 143.0 131.7 143.0 391,780.8 Well No. 5 694202 167.4 126.1 151.6 188.5 192.2 192.2 200.2 200.2 548,493.2 Totals 659 1 593 1 568 1 658 592 706.6 743 754.5 2,067,123 - Source: The DNR State Water Use Database System (SWUDS) Permit Number 1964 -1059. *Individual 5- year well volume projections based on 5 -year average annual fraction of total multiplied by the 2019 projected total use. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. W 4.2 Method Used to Delineate the Wellhead Protection Area Figure 12 shows the WHPA delineated for the City Wells using the results of the porous media modeling delineations. The WHPA is a composite of all the areas identified using methods described in this report that potentially contribute recharge to the aquifers used by the City Wells within a 10- year time of travel. 4.2.1. Porous Media Delineations The porous media delineations of the WHPA for the City Wells were completed using an existing regional MODFLOW model, Metromodel 2.0, which was provided by the Metropolitan Council (Met Council, 2009). MODFLOW is a 31), cell - centered, finite difference, saturated flow model developed by the USGS (Harbaugh et al., 2005). The regional Metromodel consists of nine layers that represent the major aquifers and aquitards within the seven - county metropolitan area. These layers represent, from top to bottom, the following units: (1) surficial aquifer of glacial deposits; (2) St. Peter Sandstone or Quaternary Buried Artesian Aquifer; (3) Prairie du Chien Group; (4) Jordan Sandstone; (5) St. Lawrence Formation (aquitard); (6) Franconia Formation; (7) Ironton - Galesville Aquifer, (8) Eau Claire Formation ( aquitard); and (9) Mt. Simon Sandstone. The regional groundwater model was calibrated to steady -state water levels and river base flows. A local -scale model, limited to parts of Wright and Sherburne Counties, was extracted from the regional seven - county model and is shown on Figure 7. The local model and all of the modeling for this amendment was completed using GMS (Aquaveo, 2013), a pre- and post - processor for MODFLOW. The local model was created using the technique of local grid refinement where a smaller, more refined grid is used within the regional model. The heads computed from the regional model then provide some of the boundary conditions for the local model as specified heads. The size of the domain and the general flow -field characteristics of the model were based on the Metromodel and the results of the original delineation. The local model domain was divided into a three - dimensional, non - uniform grid. The model has 438 rows, 424 columns, and nine layers. The details of the Metromodel were then translated to the local - scale model using GMS. Finer grid spacing was applied in the local model with telescopic mesh refinement used in the area of the site where the City wells are located. This grid spacing ( -3 in in the area of the City Wells) provides better definition in the area of the flow field where simulating the influence of pumping from the wells was critical. The base of the model is variable at an elevation of approximately 200 meters (m) above mean sea level (amsl). There are nine layers in the model to represent the bedrock units and unconsolidated materials. These layers correspond to the approximate vertical extent of the various stratigraphic units observed in the vicinity of the City. The geology in the area of the City Wells can be seen on Figures 5 and 6 and all six cross - sections in the original Part 1 report. The size of the domain and the general flow -field characteristics of the model were based on the results of the original delineations, and a preliminary analysis using the regional model. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. 10 Changes were made to the original Metromodel defined characteristics in the area of interest around the City Wells. These changes were confined primarily to the layering in the area of the City. One of the changes was to import the bedrock geology shapefiles from the 2013 Geologic Atlas of Sherburne County (MGS, 2013) to better define areas of the Mt. Simon sandstone and use the interpolated bedrock surface map to define the bedrock valley that contains City Wells No. 1, 2 and 4. The resulting model is assumed to better reflect the actual conditions found in the area of interest. Also, the thicknesses of the aquifers had to be slightly changed to be thicker in some cases and thinner in others in order to better match the data from the well logs for the City Wells. In addition to the previously mentioned changes, the following modifications were incorporated in the refined model: • The pumping rates from Table 6 were assigned to the City Wells. • The pumping rates from Table 1 in Appendix A were assigned to the permitted high- capacity wells located within the local model boundary. A series of 20 particles were launched at each well. A porosity of 20 percent was used for the Mt. Simon aquifer. As part of the sensitivity analysis, groundwater pathline analyses were performed to delineate the 1 -, S- and 10 -year capture zones and ultimately the WHPA (Figure 10). The pathline analysis consisted of using MODPATH, a flowpath calculation program, to determine the capture zone for each of the City Wells. This was completed by tracing 20 flow paths from each well for a 10 -year travel time in each of the three layers of the model the wells were located in (Layers 6 -9). The resulting WHPA boundary (Figure 12) is a composite of the 10 -year capture zones calculated using this model for the base case parameters and the parameter values used in the sensitivity analysis and are discussed in the following section. The model input files are available upon request from the MDH. 4.3 Results of Model Calibration and Sensitivity Analysis The goal of numerical model calibration is to obtain a reasonable correlation between the simulated model results and observed field data. The calibration process is generally completed by running a series of steady -state simulations (simulations where the flow magnitude and direction are constant with time), comparing calculated heads to the measured heads at wells within the model domain while changing the model parameters until the best match between the two is achieved. After a model is reasonably calibrated a sensitivity analysis is used to determine the impact that changes to an input parameter have on the output of the model. In areas where there is a great deal of uncertainty in the physical parameters, either as a consequence of lack of data or based on the uncertainty associated with the interpretation of available data (i.e. pumping test analyses), a number of models are generally run to observe the effect on the model results over the range of potential values for each of the significant parameters. While none of the individual capture zones delineated as part of this analysis should be considered the "correct" one, it is assumed that the actual capture zone is encompassed by the resulting concatenation of analysis zones. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. 11 4.3. 1. Calibration The calibration plot, showing measured versus simulated hydraulic head values for the model is illustrated on Figure 8. The plot shows that the simulated values and measured head values generally compare quite favorably and have a normalized root mean squared (NRMS) error of approximately 14 percent. More extensive and current observation data collected within the same general time period and more accurate, site - specific transmissivity values throughout the model domain would improve calibration and model confidence. The groundwater flow field and hydraulic heads in the area of the City for the calibrated model are shown on Figure 9. The 1 -, 5 -, and 10 -year capture zones predicted using the calibrated model are shown on Figure 10. However, due to the potential variability associated with the physical characteristics of the aquifer; a sensitivity /uncertainty analysis was completed as part of the modeling effort, which is shown on Figure 11. 4.3.2. Analy Lis Sensitivity is the amount of change in model results caused by the variation of a particular input parameter. For example, changing the hydraulic conductivity of an area can change the calculated head values in and around the area of the modified model as compared to the heads in unmodified model. Because of the relative simplicity of the area of interest in this model, the size and orientation of the modeled capture zone may be sensitive to any of the input parameters: The pumping rate determines the volume of the aquifer that donates water to the well. Increasing the pumping rate will expand the capture zone, for a given thickness, and decreasing is will make the capture zone smaller. • Results — The pumping rate for each well was defined by MR and therefore is not a variable for consideration in this analysis. The direction of groundwater flow and gradient can vary significantly with changing conditions such as fluctuations in local surface water elevations or the pumping rates of local wells. • Results — The regional flow direction and gradient were determined through the modeling process and closely resemble the flow direction and gradient determined through mathematical analysis of the measured heads in the area. The models were calibrated to hydraulic heads, and the local refined model calibration mirrored the regional calibration. Based on the regional observation data, the characteristics of the flow field and the use of the aquifers of interest there is not likely to be a significant change to the flow field. The horizontal hydraulic conductivity influences the size and shape of the capture zone. • Results - Analysis of pumping test and specific capacity data for wells in the area indicate a hydraulic conductivity range of approximately 65 to 820 ft/d (20 to 250 m /d) in the unconsolidated material. There is less information available on the conductivity of the bedrock aquifers in the area, however local specific capacity data and information from tests at City of Big Lake Wells indicate that weathered, surficial bedrock conductivities likely range from LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. 12 approximately 39 to 180 ft/d (12 to 55 m/d). As a result of these potential conductivities, a range of potential values of hydraulic conductivity for both the bedrock and QBAA aquifers were examined during the uncertainty analysis described in Section 4.4. The aquifer thickness and porosity influence the size and shape of the capture zone by limiting the water - bearing volume within a given area of aquifer. Decreasing or increasing either thickness or porosity forces a proportional decrease or increase in the areal extent of the capture zone. • Results - The thickness of the aquifers around the wells in the model was adjusted to reflect the approximate thicknesses of the QBAA and the Mt. Simon Sandstone from the well logs. In addition, the conductivity at each well in the model was modified such that the modeled transmissivity would match the transmissivity calculated from the actual thickness and referenced conductivity from Tables 3 and 4. 4.4 Addressing Model Uncertainty Using computer models to simulate groundwater flow always requires that simplifying assumptions be made. Local geology can be highly variable and information from well logs and pumping tests indicates that this is likely the case near the City Wells. Unfortunately, existing information is not detailed enough to define this degree of variability and interpretation of log and test data is often inconsistent. For models of the scale used in this study, the information and computational ability does not exist to precisely delineate the WHPA. To account for this, a number of models are run to examine the various potential WHPAs for the wells, given the range of the input data mentioned previously. MODFLOW models were used to delineate the capture zones for the QBAA and Mt. Simon Aquifers that supply water to the City Wells. As described previously, the hydraulic conductivity was the single variable identified that could cause the greatest change in the WHPAs for the City Wells. The range of hydraulic conductivity determined from testing and analysis is summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Simulations were completed using the reference values for the conductivity as well as both the high and low values from the ranges to complete the uncertainty analysis. Capture areas were then delineated for the assessed range of aquifer conductivities for a time -of- travel period of 10 years and are shown on Figure 11. The WHPAs for the City wells consist of a composite of the three porous media aquifer delineations for the refererence and high and low conductivity values used in the uncertainty analysis, shown on Figure 11. 5. Delineation of the Drinking Water Supply Management Area The boundaries of the DWSMA were defined by LBG and the public water supplier using roads and Public Land Survey System coordinates (Figure 12). Because surface water is not hydraulically connected to the aquifers near the City wells, a conjunctive delineation was not necessary. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. 13 6. Vulnerability Assessments The Part 1 WHP Plan includes the vulnerability assessments for the public water supply well and DWSMA. These vulnerability assessments are used to help define potential contamination sources within the DWSMA and to select appropriate measures for reducing the risk that they present to the public water supply. 6.1 Assessment of Well Sensitivity Review of site - specific data from the CWI and data presented in the previous model report indicates that low to moderate amounts of low permeability material overlies the QBAA and Mt. Simon aquifers across the majority of the DWSMA. Areas closer to Wells No. 1 through 4 are characterized by low geologic sensitivity, while the area closer to Well No. 5 is considered moderate geologic sensitivity. The assessment of geologic sensitivity is a useful metric when estimating the relative vertical downward travel time of contaminants from grade level to the water table or source aquifer. A Level -3 DNR geologic sensitivity assessment was used for the City Wells. The Level -3 DNR geologic sensitivity rating is an empirical value determined by dividing the cumulative thickness of low permeability units above the aquifer by 10 (DNR, 1991). The resulting score is termed the "L- score ". A higher L -score indicates more low - permeability material above the aquifer, and therefore a lower vulnerability. A low L -score represents higher vulnerability. For example, a rating of L -1 has a higher vulnerability than L -9, because there is less low - permeability material present above the aquifer. A Level -3 assessment was conducted since the aquifers are overlain by varying thicknesses of clay. As mentioned above, points are also assigned to casing integrity and depth, pumping rate, isolation distance to contaminant sources, and chemical data, in addition to the geologic sensitivity. A Level -3 assessment was also conducted for all CWI wells located in the vicinity of the DWSMA delineation. The geologic sensitivity "L- scores" were calculated by MDH using a Geographic Information System tool that utilizes lithology information from the MN CWI. Figure 13 illustrates the geologic sensitivity for the DWSMA as determined by mapping L- scores from the 43 well logs across the DWSMA. Geologic sensitivity near the City Wells range from low near Wells No. 1 through 4 to moderate near Well No. 5. 6.2 Assessment of Well Vulnerability The well vulnerability assessment was conducted in accordance with the MDH guidance document, Assessing Well Vulnerability for Wellhead Protection (MDH, 1997). The vulnerability of a well is scored based on the following six categories: DNR geologic sensitivity rating, casing integrity, casing depth, pumping rate, isolation distance from contaminant sources, and chemical and isotopic information. Vulnerability assessment rating sheets and vulnerability scores for Wells No. 1 through 5 were obtained from the MDH and reviewed by LBG. The final vulnerability ratings for each City well were highly determined by the L- scores and Tritium values greater than 1 Tritium Unit (T.U.). The Tritium values greater than 1 T.U. automatically put Wells No. 2 through 5 into the vulnerable category. The exception is City well No. 1, which does not have Tritium data available. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. 14 6.3 Assessment of the Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability Once the geologic sensitivity was determined for wells in the DWSMA and vulnerability ratings were determined for the City Wells, the vulnerability ratings for the DWSMA could be determined. Since the moderate geologic sensitivity within the DWSMA can explain the presence of Tritium, the vulnerability ratings remains the same as the sensitivity rating (Figure 14). 7. Comparing Original Part 1 to Amended Part 1 The original Part 1 was completed using an analytic element model that represented the aquifer using a single thickness, a groundwater flow gradient and limited conductivity values. The amended model employs MODFLOW to represent the complex geology in the Monticello area and allows for variable thickness as well as the variable flow directions induced by a large buried valley and the Mississippi River. The additions and modifications in both boundary conditions and modeling method lead to some significant changes in the WHPA delineations as seen in Figure 15. The WHPAs for the City Wells are generally similar to the original as far as direction of flow, however, the WHPAs are much longer due to increased pumping rates and the effect of the uncertainty analysis. 8. Recommendations Upon completion of this Part 1 WHP Plan amendment, the following recommendations are provided for the City to consider for better understanding the hydrogeologic conditions of the source aquifers and refinement of future WHPA delineations. • Obtain more area - specific hydraulic conductivity data in the area of the City Wells to reduce model uncertainty and potentially the size of the capture zones and DWSMA. This can be completed by conducting additional pumping tests on the City Wells or other existing high capacity wells. • Collect samples of City Well water, local Mississippi River water and precipitation and conduct stable isotope analyses of these to determine if there is any contribution from surface water and, if there is, determine the magnitude and source of that contribution. • Continue collecting groundwater samples for analysis of regulated contaminants and provide the data to the MDH. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. 15 9. References Aquaveo, 2013. Groundwater Modeling System (GMS, version 9.0) [Computer Software], Provo, UT, Aquaveo, LLC. Geologic Sensitivity Project Workgroup, 1991. Criteria and guidelines for assessing geologic sensitivity of ground water resources in Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Waters, St. Paul, Minn., 122 p. Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C., and McDonald, M.G., 2000. MODFLOW -2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground -water model - -user guide to modularization concepts and the ground -water flow process, Open -File Report, 00 -92, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va., 121 p. Lusardi, Barbara A., 2013. C -32 Geologic Atlas of Sherburne County, Minnesota [Part A], Minnesota Geological Survey. Metromodel 2.0, 2009. (hqp: / /www.metrocouncil. org/ environment/ WaterSuPply/ metrogroundwatermodeldatasets .htm) Minnesota Department of Health, 2010. Minnesota public land survey system quarter - quarter sections (derived from section corners), computer file, St. Paul, Minn. Minnesota Department of Health, 1997. Assessing Well and Aquifer Vulnerability for Wellhead Protection. Draft document, February 1997, pp. 23. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1991. Criteria and Guidelines for Assessing Geologic Sensitivity of Ground Water Resources in Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Appropriation Permit Program Wehsite (www.dnr.state.n-m.us/waters/watermamt section/gppropriations/wateruse.html) Mossler, John H., 2013. Bedrock Geology of the Twin Cities Ten - County Metropolitan Area, Minnesota Map M -194. Minnesota Geologic Survey, Pollock, D.W., 1994, User's Guide for MODPATH /MODPATH -PLOT, Version 3: A particle tracking post - processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite- difference ground -water flow model: U.S. Geological Survey Open -File Report 94 -464, 6 ch. LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Figures LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. 51 Cal Wh VW-14 i f,' _ ; _ f 011 ® it MA e E PR K ' ® -(2180,32) ®� ® 0000 F too MONTICELLO 5 ® 3 3 MONTICELLO.2 �:. ,(694202) f (236578) �MONTICELLO 3 x(439866) y on MONTICELL',4 - - - - n 449182 () — ",- � - a4- _ of Q - {- Wi1S7LiFE -!M. .t79FTtt' •- V IV - 2 P /i= 1 t.. y 25 • a -- aki el ��-f'— Site ,� - o 2 t ike City Well (OBAA) Source: ESRI Online Ima e : Copyright: 2010 National Geographic Societ . CWI Online and CWI Wells Database. SWUDS Database. ® City Well (CMTS) ,� Prepared CITY OF MONTICELLO � v LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS RS &GRAHAM, INC. High Capacity Well Professional Groundwater and MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 5 ; Environmental Engineering Services 8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 SITE LOCATION, HIGH CAPACITY WELLS, AND MODEL DOMAIN 5 Model Domain St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 (651) 490 -1405 FILE: g3monticellowhp0la.MXD DATE: 10/2/2014 FIGURE: 1 92 o -• \ — .970 I co o � 9 . s• • • N 2S 900o, cn _ — _ BB W!I n ntt 0 otil spy Aer R o 930 COO �' • h O Ce p o4j 905 <0' ° MON�TjICELL•O 1 - �,,� 90.0 (2,18032) 905 900 9SS t ;�cc "iy ay 88S •• 0 895 irc �rF MOB TICELLO 2 ' a 3j, $go as h `so (236578) MONTICE 5 (694202 o py o gp° ono _ �.� �o �,, •ice - � _ _ � .) ��h �• � •, 9. c90 8 g6. 94o N MONTICELLO.3 °7 ', rn��• Sa�MONTICELLO.4� 439866`v • °° `�� •, ~915 of - 44971 82)- ( ) 910 rn 920 • �S sg60 s � 95 935 <� 930 p, o 5 0 0 2$ f Ul 9SS O (9 • ' rn o CD K O�� rn� r 945 C0°�g5 945 915,_ 945 4 gyJ �} vI - '% oo� Site 925 965 °m r • •'t ftk: ;^may — — Mils �s� oh° Source: ESRI Online Imagery: Copyright 2010 National Geographic Society. MN County Well Index. 935 , a Note: Wate level elevation contours created using ESRI's Natural Neighbor interpolation tool. • City Well QBAA Well Used in Groundwater Prepared By: CITY OF MONTICELLO • LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Elevation Contours L Professional Groundwater and MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA — Groundwater Elevation Contour (feet amsl) BG Environmental Engineering Services o F Groundwater Flow Direction s Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 QBAA GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS 2 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 j (651) 490 -1405 FILE: g3monticellowhp01i.MXD DATE: 10/2/2014 FIGURE: 2 —•` - -, -' _,yam' - �^ __ -- • �h • O - < moo ho \! _ P 0 I2 I '`. �• gg5 I . a � 920 Tower I � • ACra • o - _ MoWiCero MONTICELLO -13 " •� • 05 (2,180.32) s90 . • fg J.a ke MONTICELLO -2 � sso 88 s s e (2365 78) MQNTICELLO 5 ��`' -' _ tilted • - (694202) - 895 sg wt iS �`•I I , $ 95�� 0 co 88 � co o ' n ng k MONTITICEL MONTICELL0..4. 00, 900 A (449182) ( 439866 ) • � 905 ` — + •rn �C 0 o ort n .akel • P B 0), r ra y 1 '� Site . Miles 3; Source: ESRI Online Imagery: Copyright 2010 National Geographic Society. MN County Well Index. U Note: Wate level elevation contours created using ESRI's Natural Neighbor interpolation tool. • City Well ' v CEMS, CMTS, and CMRC Well Used in • Groundwater Elevation Contours L Prepared By: LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 3 - Professional Groundwater and — Groundwater Elevation Contour (feet amsl) ,B :.c+ Environtnental Engineering Services n F Groundwater Flow Direction G s Pine Tree Drive, sidle BEDROCK AQUIFER GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS � St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 12 (651) 490 -1405 1 FILE: g3monticellowhp01h.MXD DATE: 10/2/2014 FIGURE: 3 e -H079 Pgr A 421021 T 12 Pgr - � m �" i �\ I I Ce -- * 2i iTadic, 'I L 570556 Watson Tower !� �. Aero I Ce cm I Cm -7 \` I MONTICELLO 1 221172B' Mss cm'`' Ce _ (218032) - ` -- �it �— �/ MONTICELLO 2 cm 586149 Ce�Rl' ;Cw cw ��.'i�� 236578 cm i1 [1 ) cw.,tc ( ) MONTICELLO 5 cm ��"" �,� 3 y c (694202) Ce •c� a�— c !! �� �/ C Cm - 11 -_ F� % Lurus� MONTICELLO3 p MONTICELLO4 •i <_., I / (449182) (439866) n ; Mss- 163601 y r Ce Ctc n I, 214558 i cm ) + -.r. R 249021 �A n 2 -- i Ctc `e } I - 0 1 I i Miles + 119101 Ctc Tunnel City Group (CFIG) ��� cw A Wonewoc Sandstone (CFIG) . -` r cm Ce Ce Ce Eau Claire Formation (CECR) Site Note: Bedrock names vary slightly from cross sections A -A' and B -B' \ cm Mt. Simon Sandstone (CMTS) as the MGS bedrock files have been updated per MAP M -194. L Mss Hinckley Sandstone (PMFL) / Source: ESRI Online Imagery: Copyright 2010 National Geographic Society. MN County Fond du Lac Formation (PMHN) 9 Quartzofeldspathic Well Index. Bedrock Geology (S -20- 2000). - cm c Agn Orthogneiss Prepared By: Pgr Granite Intrusion CITY OF MONTICELLO LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. v [ MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA • City ell on Cross Section Professional Groundwater and y $ Environmental Engineering Services ED CWI Wells on Cross Section G s Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS AND 3 Cross Section Location St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 BEDROCK GEOLOGY 0 (651) 490 -1405 FILE: g3monticellowhp01c.MXD DATE: 9/17/2014 FIGURE: 4 Cross Section B-B' �� | �� | �& ��� n u�� '' �� U���w�&� ��` �� '- ��������� n�~.nunn ..', -' ��~..~�xn 1050 1050 102s 102s 1000 1000 nr� ero (Z 4D 1975 osn eoo Clay ous - e2» non eno _ � Clay aro `'~` - orn 000 ` oon m aus -.-� 000 E Sand E m 000 ` ' 000 m Sand r7� ][ ` 775 ron roo - - - - _ `�| . `� .���� W � � 7�s ,'- - � - - - - - ----=-7` -`- ruo m 700 . / roo , ? ' 675 -- --- ---------- pMno — 675 -��'`� - - - | ,' T ----------- --- ] , ss» ? -- _- _ _ - - -' - - - - ' ? . soo _- ? ' sus --^ , szs ___-- pMno - - ----------------------------------- 000 - - --- - _ _ _ soo 575 -----_ 575 ' -------_ | osm ------ | 000 52s 525 nno 000 475 475 450 450 � 42s 425 o 400 400 | 0 Till, Silt, Silty Clayey Sand C M T S.-'. � Mt. Simon Sandstone Source: Geologic information from Minnesota County Well Index. Sand and Gravel �-.tMk&: Mt. Simon Red Clastics Prepared By: CITY OF MONTICELLO L Professional Groundwater and MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Franconia Ironton Galesville B Envirommental Engineering Services k 8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 --::: Iron Galesville / Eau Claire St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 E I E --- (651) 490-1405 — rFILE: g3monticellowhpOld CO CIV 1965 --�- Clay 525 mm 475 Cross Section A-A' co 0 co 198�8, Sand IV) V2 1999 Clay Sand Clay o 1,000 2,000 ININININE�� Feet 1 inch =200O feet hnriznnta,| Screened O Completed as 1 inoh= 100 feet vertical | Interval " Open Hole Bo Northeast 1050 1025 1000 975 me orn 000 ° E 000 m rro ca ron � � 725 rnn oro 000 625 ono oro oon 525 ono 475 450 425 400 | E Till, Silt, Silty Clayey Sand Mt. Simon Sandstone Source: Geologic information from Minnesota County Well Index. :..CMFL Mt. Simon Fond du Lac Prepared By: Sand and Gravel CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA L Professional Groundwater and Hinckley Sandstone Iron Galesville Eau Claire B Environmental Engineering Services 8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 Eau Claire Mt Simon Red Clastics (651) 490-1405 FILE: g3monticellowhpOle xsect B-B.MXD I DATE: 10/2/2014 FIGURE: 6 aser - j T.,* J `1 �3 Ora a. �' C'p ` i � i ••v��/ / / /.f { � � _"�' � t J 1 eK7� cS7 rr I f I _ z 4Y f take \ Sr 7 _ ) o, ` AEI VE CR 1'K Q- t�= a . 31 7-1 O O , _ ���.' Fri \� t- �� ;�� -�j •l%O Y� Yji � I _ V r /r �L a.. I_f MONTICELLO 1 d - ' c (218032) #E —I 10 :�a 1 MONTICELLO 5 s ' - �, take rrnn_ MONTICELLO 2/ (694202)' L NTICELL `3 � 0(236578) MO "`O v > r.a 1,(439866) C ry '- �:-=a- _�. MONTICELLO 4 - - _ (4 4918 C ot ci F 7�r o �O 2 a I r 4 I 6 'AAAE ITAW _�� a 11r 25 - r Site v r L A K. - Miles � I Source: ESRI Online Imagery: Copyright: 2010 National Geographic Society. CWI Online and CWI Wells Database. • City Well Prepared By: O Calibration Points 2 LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. L CITY OF MONTICELLO Professional Groundwater and MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA D Modification Area Environmental Engineering Services G 8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 MODEL DOMAIN, CALIBRATION LOCATIONS, AND MODIFICATION AREAS Local Model Domain St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 � (651) 490 -1405 FILE: g3monticellowhp0lk.MXD DATE: 10/2/2014 FIGURE: 7 a rn 0 m 0 N V O N N O Computed as. Observed Values Hydraulic Head 295 290 ♦ zss �* ♦i � i ♦ice # ♦ + i40 F 280 ♦ +; +i � 275 ♦ � ,� M A ►i ♦ ♦ 270 � ♦ i 265 260 26G 265 270 275 28C 285 29C Observed Head (m) Prepared By: CITY OF MONTICELLO LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. L Professional Groundwater and MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA $ y.C, Environmental Engineering Services 8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 MODEL CALIBRATION St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 (651) 490 -1405 FILE: g3monticeIIowhp01J.MXD DATE: 10/2/2014 1 FIGURE: 8 945 ;: M • J �1 ®• 930 F 1 Q 1Ii VE C __CEt . - — 19 ® �� W' ,� —910 �• �' t18 ®••® ®® = Qr�lt Ts f ® r' 5 ro — — 21 . \ }M t � l� y L c sMA Yl: jj- ® ® •, ® ® ®(9 ° tc MONTICELL051 `(218032) ®'- ,.. crut: I� f MONTI�cELLO'5 ® ;- MONTICELLO 2x(694202) -. S Mo -- - _ , (23 578) .1 "MONTICELL'O'3�?- - _ � h t � c.. r P� y -I_ - "erg ,. • 'ti � - ,,� � � o MONTICELLO 4 n ti �' lti L r _ _. I� x(449182) t, - }O _ o _ . co Rn CD •O f W9i YlLffi irfA O 5 ., r -- _ D ID -j L r • ,- — K I S Mile r r!- / A z lo.. Site City Well 930 - -,. b 9 ` �0 • Well Calibration Location IRF zw High- Capacity Well Used in Groundwater Flow Model Source: ESRI Online Imagery: Copyright 2010 National Geographic Society. MN Count Well Index. MN DNR Appropriations Database SWUDS Simulated Potentiometric Surface Contour feet amsl LEGGETTE, Prepared By: BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. CITY OF MONTICELLO Professional Groundwater and MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 5 Groundwater Flow Direction B k _k Environmental vironental Engineering Services e Local Model Domain G 8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 SIMULATED GROUNDWATER EQUIPOTENTIAL CONTOURS (651) 490 -1405 FILE: g3monticellowhp01q.MXD DATE: 10/3/2014 FIGURE: 9 � Ns L tow MONTICELLO1 i v (218032) - T �, �• MONTICELLO 2' _ 236578) MONTICELLO 5 (694202) 3 I MONTICELLO 3 �, �,� I • 439866)- .' D 4L 1 ld r • _ MONTICELLO 4 (449182) ' a Site 0 " �iF 0.5 y Miles _ / ✓ '�-- M a • City Well Source: ESRI Online Imagery: Co ri ht 2010 National Geographic Societ . MN Count Well Index. Prepared By: 1 -Year Flowpaths Mt. Simon Aquifer CITY OF MONTICELLO LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS &GRAHAM, INC. 5 -Year Flowpaths Mt. Simon Aquifer Professional Groundwater and MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA D 10 -Year Flowpaths Mt. Simon Aquifer 8G Environtnental Engineering Services 8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 1, 5, AND 10 YEAR FLOWPATHS FOR CALIBRATED MODEL St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 (651) 490 -1405 FILE: g3monticellowhp011.MXD DATE: 10/2/2014 FIGURE: 10 4 r @ d :j 1 Aw i U _ MONTICELLO 3 (439866) MONTICELLO 4 (_449182) /� ' 0 ool BIVdd 'I ) - o c a� r � — r N No W ,r r V � r �o I _ �_ rrP • • 4 an 33 1� - ti i .Site 0 0.5 Miles U • City Well Source: ESRI Online Imagery: Co ri ht 2010 National Geo ra M hic Society. N Count Well Index. Prepared By: — 10 -Year Flowpaths Uncertainty Anaylysis T CITY OF MONTICELLO L LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. v Professional Groundwater and MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA _ Environmental vironental Engineering Services 8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS 9 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 (651) 490 -1405 FILE: g3monticellowhpOlr.MXD DATE: 10/3/2014 FIGURE: 11 I j V I , (218032) -. 0 11 i A` L) �- _ MONTICELLO (236578)" _ MONTICEL`LO 5, 4 r @ d :j 1 Aw i U _ MONTICELLO 3 (439866) MONTICELLO 4 (_449182) /� ' 0 ool BIVdd 'I ) - o c a� r � — r N No W ,r r V � r �o I _ �_ rrP • • 4 an 33 1� - ti i .Site 0 0.5 Miles U • City Well Source: ESRI Online Imagery: Co ri ht 2010 National Geo ra M hic Society. N Count Well Index. Prepared By: — 10 -Year Flowpaths Uncertainty Anaylysis T CITY OF MONTICELLO L LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. v Professional Groundwater and MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA _ Environmental vironental Engineering Services 8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS 9 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 (651) 490 -1405 FILE: g3monticellowhpOlr.MXD DATE: 10/3/2014 FIGURE: 11 •- I FIN �� o ( J ae MONTICELLO 1 ° ' " /] (218032) MONTICELLO 2 }} — D / (236578) MONTICELLO 5 4 Y j _ j Merck (694202)r -� PA ,.y �- i - MONTICELLO 3 d— 4 ! \ 1.0 'J f �NMAOO N T I C E L L 4 V ` ® (449182) ]o- z -ate 4 � d ��, / �✓ 0 __ p d S - - t . �� ` %- K O ro Mil Q` : v ® City Well —0 d 73 'r a Site � ® Insufficient Data 0 Domestic Well S3`� P — Combined Wellhead Protection Area /'� - • O, a Drinking Water Supply Management Area f Geologic Sensitivity Source: Co ri ht 2011 National Geographic Society, i- cubed. MN Cou tv Well Index. Very High Sensitivity ' Prepared P 0 High Sensitivity CITY OF MONTICELLO '- Moderate Sensitivity LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. 0 Low Sensitivity (L-Score: 1 -3 L Professional Groundwater and MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA g � Low Sensitivity (L- Score: 4 -7; D Very Low Sensitivity (L-Score: 8 -11) 8 _ C EnvirontnentalEngineering Services s Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENTAREA O Very Low Sensitivity (L- Score: >11) St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 GEOLOGIC SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT (651) 490 -1405 FILE: g3monticellowhpOlo.MXD DATE: 10/3/2014 FIGURE: 13 34 46 J - �'�° aer f 1 MONTICELLO 1 U i -' — 1.1 ' (218032)' MONTICELLO 2 I "6 (236578) - - MONTICELL•O'5, _ Lake _ (694202) _ r MONTICELLO J, Y !. , (439866) -, cra (o l� ©1 MONT�ICELLO 4 =, �:.�/ ( • (449182) - V rS — _ K ,yam 23 1' .ass Site \ ' Miles ® City Well U — Combined Wellhead Protection Area Source: ESRI Online Imagery: Copyright 2010 National Geographic Societ . MN County Well Index. Drinking Water Supply Management Area Prepared By: LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. CITY OF MONTICELLO v DWSMA Vulnerability L MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Very HI h Professional Groundwater and y g B Environmental Engineering Services OHigh G APineTreeDnve,Suie 250 DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA Moderate VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT LOW St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 (651) 490 -1405 FILE: g3monticellowhpOlp.MXD DATE: 1/27/2015 FIGURE: 14 0 N, 35 N N 30 9NTIG ELLO 1 I 24�80j2)-' M 0 TICELLU-2 T 0 a (236578) MONTICELL i Lake (694202) Pk MONTICELLO 3 j fa M' . �V ( — r— - -- - V 439866) -- N ICELLO 4 —(49182) s. '410 140 5 D ti 0 0 7 C UL 23 2 Site 0 as V 0 L Source: ESRI Online Imagery: Copyright 2010 National Geographic Society. MN County Well Index. City Well Prepared By: CITY OF MONTICELLO 2014 Amended Wellhead Protection Area LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. L MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 2004 Original Wellhead Protection Area Professional Groundwater and B Etivirontnental Engineering Services a G 8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250 ORIGINAL AND AMENDED WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS 6 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 (651) 490-1405 FILE: g3monticellowhpOl n.MXD DATE: 10/3/2014 FIGURE: Di Appendix A Other High Capacity Wells Included in Model LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Appendix A - Other Permitted High- Capacity Wells Within 5 Miles of Wellfield Unique Number Well Name Aquifer PerVmit Number Use Average Withdrawal (2007- 2011) MGY 523954 BIG LAKE 4 CMTS 1979 -3190 Waterworks 127.2 217948 BIG LAKE 2 CMFL 1979 -3190 Waterworks 98.1 659386 BIG LAKE 5 CMRC 1979 -3190 Waterworks 96.44 705488 BIG LAKE 6 CMFL 1979 -3190 Waterworks 78.92 220959 BIG LAKE 1 CMFL 1979 -3190 Waterworks 45.24 763778 BIG LAKE 7 CMSH 1979 -3190 Waterworks 44.5 455993 HOLTHAUS JOE QBUA 1989 -3388 Major Crop Irrigation 41.36 457845 EWING JIM NO.1 CMFL 1981 -3130 Major Crop Irrigation 38.54 126519 DECHENE JIM NO.1 QBAA 1977 -3381 Major Crop Irrigation 37.8 247948 DECHENE JAMES 1984 -3223 Major Crop Irrigation 37.24 247947 DECHENE JAMES 1984 -3222 Major Crop Irrigation 33.66 242347 OFFUTT FARMS INDT 1976 -3482 Major Crop Irrigation 32.56 126505 WILTS HARLAN NO.1 CMFL 1977 -3315 Major Crop Irrigation 32.08 490888 PETERSON ART QBAA 1974 -5108 Major Crop Irrigation 31.96 217961 PETERSON BROS. FARMS 1 CMRC 1964 -0985 Major Crop Irrigation 29.14 225862 DEL HAYES WELL NO.1 QBAA 1963 -0251 Major Crop Irrigation 28.58 244999 SANFORD JAMES INDT 1992 -3075 Major Crop Irrigation 28.18 528421 GRAND DOUG QBAA 1974 -5136 Major Crop Irrigation 27.1 217962 SANFORD TRUMAN NO. 1 MTPL 1989 -3395 Major Crop Irrigation 25.44 229488 DECHENE FARMS NO.1 CMFL 1977 -3382 Major Crop Irrigation 25.06 217949 URWIN HAROLD NO.1 CMTS 1966 -0319 Major Crop Irrigation 24.88 214549 BOHANON CHARLES CMRC 1964 -0152 Major Crop Irrigation 24.44 107243 BUCKLEY JERRY QBAA 1977 -3198 Major Crop Irrigation 23.8 221165 ZIMMERMAN LES CMFL 1992 -3078 Major Crop Irrigation 22.42 188786 BERNDT GARY QWTA 1984 -3016 Major Crop Irrigation 22.4 221161 SPRINGBROOK FARM NO.1 CMRC 1978 -3181 Major Crop Irrigation 21.94 163648 BIG LAKE 3 CMRC 1979 -3190 Waterworks 21 188756 ERICKSON VINCE QBAA 1997 -3194 Major Crop Irrigation 20.48 501461 URWIN LARRY NO.1 MTPL 1989 -3547 Major Crop Irrigation 19.62 221159 SANFORD TRUMAN CMTS 1961 -0234 Major Crop Irrigation 18.16 217956 SANFORD & SONS NO.2 CEMS 1992 -3077 Major Crop Irrigation 18.12 221172 SANFORD TRUMAN NO.2 PMSU 1989 -3396 Major Crop Irrigation 17.66 435967 MONTICELLO COUNTRY CLUB QWTA 1988 -3272 Non -Crop Irrigation 17.48 457024 SANFORD TRUMAN QBAA 1975 -3204 Major Crop Irrigation 17.26 232380 PANAYATOFF VEG. NO.1 QWTA 1981 -3252 Non -Crop Irrigation 17.2 LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Unique Number Well Name Aquifer PerVmit Number Use Average Withdrawal (2007- 2011) MGY 217955 ENWING GERALD NO.1 CMTS 1984 -3196 Major Crop Irrigation 16.54 456936 FULLER RAY CMFL 1990 -3396 Major Crop Irrigation 15.84 221155 HAYES DEL NO.1 CEMS 1958 -0229 Major Crop Irrigation 15.34 217953 SANFORD PETE NO.1 CMTS 1970 -0028 Major Crop Irrigation 15 217952 HAYES DEL NO.1 CMTS 1966 -0295 Major Crop Irrigation 14.78 126513 GRAMSEY BOB CMRC 1977 -3335 Major Crop Irrigation 13.74 225857 OLSON MALCOLM & STEVE QBAA 1971 -0423 Major Crop Irrigation 13.7 126508 GRAMSEY KATHERINE NO.1 PMSU 1977 -3206 Major Crop Irrigation 13.68 173034 GRAHAM BOB QBAA 1981 -3098 Major Crop Irrigation 13.28 217959 BOHANON HOWARD CMRC 1963 -0428 Major Crop Irrigation 12.92 481259 KLATT ROGER J. QBAA 1997 -3155 Major Crop Irrigation 12.2 225850 LAURENZ DAVE PMSU 1977 -3207 Major Crop Irrigation 11.64 225849 HILLER EARL PMSU 1970 -0490 Major Crop Irrigation 11.62 242210 MONTICELLO COUNTRY CLUB INDT 1988 -3272 Non -Crop Irrigation 11.06 182191 GRAMSEY BOB QWTA 1986 -3113 Major Crop Irrigation 10.58 229489 DECHENE FARMS CMFL 1977 -3383 Major Crop Irrigation 9.92 221160 DECHENE LEONARD NO.2 CMFL 1962 -0062 Major Crop Irrigation 9.54 181971 GRAMSEY BOB QWTA 1982 -3130 Major Crop Irrigation 8.98 229642 BAHANON CHARLES QWTA 1978 -3268 Major Crop Irrigation 8.96 458538 SANFORD JIM QWTA 1990 -3242 Major Crop Irrigation 8.04 236025 NSP MONTICELLO NO.1 CMTS 1967 -0083 Power Generation 7.3 458550 SANFORD &SONS QWTA 1990 -3242 Major Crop Irrigation 7.26 181955 URWIN LARRY CEMS 1982 -3234 Major Crop Irrigation 7.1 221157 PANAYOTOFF GEORGE NO.1 CMTS 1969 -0540 Major Crop Irrigation 6.88 598602 KJELLBERG'S EAST 4 QBAA 1993 -3050 Waterworks 6.46 247601 KJELLBERG'S WEST 2 INDT 1993 -3161 Waterworks 6.32 218039 NSP MONTICELLO NOA CMTS 1967 -0083 Power Generation 5.46 247598 KJELLBERG'S EAST 2 QUUU 1993 -3050 Waterworks 5.4 770430 EWING FARMS QBAA 2010 -0312 Major Crop Irrigation 5.34 633193 KJELLBERG'S WEST 4 QBAA 1993 -3161 Waterworks 5.28 247600 KJELLBERG'S WEST 1 INDT 1993 -3161 Waterworks 4.92 247616 SANFORD & SONS NO.1 INDT 1993 -3177 Major Crop Irrigation 4.04 774331 EWING FARMS QBAA 2010 -0313 Major Crop Irrigation 3.98 457856 ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH CMFL 1990 -3123 Air Conditioning 3.6 232440 RIVER TERRACE TRAILOR PARK 1 QBAA 1977 -3451 Waterworks 2 661057 EWING FARMS INC. CMTS 2003 -3106 Industrial Processing 1.4 247599 KJELLBERG'S PARK 2 QWTA 1993 -3050 Waterworks 1.18 LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 Appendix D - Inner Wellhead Management Zone Surveys City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 LGU Review • +;'� Environmental Health Division Drinking Water Protection Section INNER WELLHEAD MANAGEMENT ZONE (IWMZ) - IIH6 lanrxE iF St Pau L n Minnesota 55164 -0975 POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY (PCSI) REPORT PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION PWS ID NAME ADDRESS 1860012 COMMUNITY Monticello Monticello Water Superintendent, 909 Golf Course Road, Monticello, MN 55362 FACILITY (WELL) INFORMATION NAME FACILITY ID UNIQUE WELL NO. COUNTY Well #1 IS THERE A WELL LOG OR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION S01 INFORMATION AVAILABLE? 218032 0 YES (Please attach a copy) Wright 0 NO 0 UNDETERMINED PWS ID / FACILITY ID j 1860012 S01 UNIQUE WELL NO. 218032 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (�) Community Non - community Aqricultural Related *AC1 Agricultural chemical buried piping 50 50 N *AC2 Agricultural chemical multiple tanks or containers for residential retail sale or use, no single tank or container exceeding, but aggregate volume exceeding 56 gal. or 100 lbs. dry weight 50 50 N ACP Agricultural chemical tank or container with 25 gal. or more or 100 lbs. or more dry weight, or equipment filling or cleaning area without safeguards 150 150 N ACS Agricultural chemical storage or equipment filling or cleaning area with safeguards 100 100 N ACR Agricultural chemical storage or equipment filling or cleaning area with safeguards and roofed 50 50 N ADW Agricultural drainage well' (Class V well - illegal3) 50 50 N AAT Anhydrous ammonia tank (stationary tank) 50 50 N A131 Animal building, feedlot, confinement area, or kennel, 0.1 to 1.0 animal unit (stockyard) 50 20 100/40 N AB2 Animal building or poultry building, including a horse riding area, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 100 N ABS Animal burial area, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 N FWP Animal feeding or watering area within a pasture, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 100 N AF1 Animal feedlot, unroofed, 300 or more animal units (stockyard) 100 100 200 N AF2 Animal feedlot, more than 1.0, but less than 300 animal units (stockyard) 50 50 100 N AMA Animal manure application use discretion use discretion N REN Animal rendering plant 50 50 N MS1 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, unpermitted or noncertified 300 300 600 N MS2 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, approved earthen liner 150 150 300 N MS3 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, approved concrete or composite liner 100 100 200 N MS4 Manure (solid) storage area, not covered with a roof 100 100 200 N OSC Open storage for crops use discretion use discretion N SSTS Related AA1 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system, average flow greater than 10,000 gal. /day 300 300 600 N AA2 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system serving a facility handling infectious or pathological wastes, average flow 10,000 gal. /day or less 150 150 300 N AA3 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system, average flow 10,000 gal. /day or less 50 50 100 N AA4 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system serving multiple family residences or a non - residential facility and has the capacity to serve 20 or more persons per day (Class V well)' 50/300/1504 50/300/1504 100/600/3004 N CSP Cesspool 75 75 150 N AGG Dry well, leaching pit, seepage pit 75 75 150 N *FD1 Floor drain, grate, or trough connected to a buried sewer 50 50 N *FD2 Floor drain, grate, or trough if buried sewer is air - tested, approved materials, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 N *GW1 Gray -water dispersal area 50 50 100 N LC1 Large capacity cesspools (Class V well - illegal)' 75 75 150 N MVW Motor vehicle waste disposal (Class V well - illegal)' illegal illegal N 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S01 UNIQUE WELL NO. 11218032 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (?) Community Non - community PR1 ir- Privy, nonportable 50 50 100 N PR2 j Portable (privy) or toilet 50 20 N *SF1 Watertight sand filter; peat filter; or constructed wetland 50 50 N SET Septic tank 50 50 N HTK Sewage holding tank, watertight 50 50 N SS1 Sewage sump capacity 100 gal. or more 50 50 N SS2 Sewage sump capacity less than 100 gal., tested, conforming to rule 50 20 N *ST1 Sewage treatment device, watertight 50 50 N SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 175 Y SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 140 Y SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 155 Y SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 160 Y SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 140 Y SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 200 Y SB2 Sewer, buried, collector, municipal, serving a facility handling infectious or pathological wastes, open - jointed or unapproved materials 50 50 Y 145 N *WB1 Water treatment backwash holding basin, reclaim basin, or surge tank with a direct sewer connection 50 50 N *WB2 Water treatment backwash holding basin, reclaim basin, or surge tank with a backflow protected sewer connection 20 20 N Land Application SPT I Land spreading area for sewage, septage, or sludge 50 50 100 N Solid Waste Related COS Commercial compost site 50 50 N CD1 Construction or demolition debris disposal area 50 50 100 N *HW1 Household solid waste disposal area, single residence 50 50 100 N LF1 Landfill, permitted demolition debris, dump, or mixed municipal solid waste from multiple persons 300 300 600 N SVY Scrap yard 1 50 1 50 1 N SWT Solid waste transfer station 50 50 N Storm Water Related SDI Storm water drain pipe, 8 inches or greater in diameter 50 20 Y 200 Y SDI Storm water drain pipe, 8 inches or greater in diameter 50 20 Y 107 N SWI Storm water drainage well' (Class V well - illegal') 50 50 N SM1 Storm water pond greater than 5000 gal. 50 35 N Wells and Borinqs *EBI Elevator boring, not conforming to rule 50 50 N *EB2 Elevator boring, conforming to rule 20 20 N MON Monitoring well record dist. record dist. N WEL Operating well record dist. record dist. Y 157 UUW Unused, unsealed well or boring 50 50 N General *CR1 Cistern or reservoir, buried, nonpressurized water supply 20 20 N PLM Contaminant plume 50 50 N *CW1 Cooling water pond, industrial 50 50 100 N DC1 Deicing chemicals, bulk road 50 50 100 N *ET1 Electrical transformer storage area, oil- filled 50 50 N GRV Grave or mausoleum 50 50 N GP1 Gravel pocket or French drain for clear water drainage only 20 20 N *HS1 Hazardous substance buried piping 50 50 N HS2 Hazardous substance tank or container, above ground or underground, 56 gal. or more, or 100 lbs. or more dry weight, without safeguards 150 150 N HS3 Hazardous substance tank or container, above ground or underground, 56 gal. or more, or 100 lbs. or more dry weight with safeguards 100 100 N 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S01 UNIQUE WELL NO. 218032 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (?) Community Non - community HS4 Hazardous substance multiple storage tanks or containers for residential retail sale or use, no single tank or container exceeding 56 gal. or 100 lbs., but aggregate volume exceeding 50 50 N HWF Highest water or flood level 50 N/A N *HG1 Horizontal ground source closed loop heat exchanger buried piping 50 50 N *HG2 Horizontal ground source closed loop heat exchanger buried piping and horizontal piping, approved materials and heat transfer fluid 50 10 N IWD Industrial waste disposal well (Class V well)2 illegal' illegal' N IWS Interceptor, including a flammable waste or sediment 50 50 N OH1 Ordinary high water level of a stream, river, pond, lake, reservoir, or drainage ditch (holds water six months or more) 50 35 N *PP1 Petroleum buried piping 50 50 N *PP2 Petroleum or crude oil pipeline to a refinery or distribution center 100 100 N PT1 Petroleum tank or container, 1100 gal. or more, without safeguards 150 150 N PT2 Petroleum tank or container, 1100 gal. or more, with safeguards 100 100 N PT3 Petroleum tank or container, buried, between 56 and 1100 gal. 50 50 N PT4 Petroleum tank or container, not buried, between 56 and 1100 gal. 505 20 N Put Pit or unfilled space more than four feet in depth 20 20 N PC1 Pollutant or contaminant that may drain into the soil 50 50 100 N SP1 Swimming pool, in- ground 20 20 N *VH1 I Vertical heat exchanger, horizontal piping conforming to rule 50 10 N *VH2 Vertical heat exchanger (vertical) piping, conforming to rule 50 35 N *WR1 Wastewater rapid infiltration basin, municipal or industrial 300 300 600 N *WA1 Wastewater spray irrigation area, municipal or industrial 150 150 300 *WS1 Wastewater stabilization pond, industrial 150 150 300 *WS2 Wastewater stabilization pond, municipal, 500 or more gal. /acre /day of leakage 300 300 600 rN *WS3 Wastewater stabilization pond, municipal, less than 500 gal. /acre /day of leakage 150 150 300 *WT1 Wastewater treatment unit tanks, vessels and components (Package plant) 100 100 N *WT2 Water treatment backwash disposal area 50 50 100 N Additional Sources (If there is more than one source listed above, please indicate here). Potential Contamination Sources and Codes Based on Previous Versions of this Form SWD I Storm water drain pipe, 12 inches or greater 1 50 1 20 Y 107 N New potential contaminant source. I A sensitive well has less than 50 feet of watertight casing, and which is not cased below a confining layer or confining materials of at least 10' in thickness. z These sources, known as Class V underground injection wells, are regulated by the federal U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 3 These sources are classified as illegal by Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725. 4 Isolation distance is determined by average flow per day or if a facility handles infectious or pathological wastes. 5 A community public water - supply well must be a minimum of 50 feet from a petroleum tank or container, unless the tank or container is used for emergency pumping and is located in a room or building separate from the community well; and is of double -wall construction with leak detection between walls; or is protected with secondary containment. This form is based on the new isolation distances in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725, related to wells and borings adopted August 4, 2008, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4720, related to wellhead protection. 11/6/2015 IPWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S01 UNIQUE WELL NO. 218032 SETBACK DISTANCES All potential contaminant sources must be noted on sketch. Record the distance and approximate compass bearing of each potential contaminant source from the well, and identify the source using the "Source Code ". Unlabeled points on the map are unsealed wells. 0° SB 3150 S 1 450 � 1 SB1 SB � , n ` SWD 270° 90° ` D1 0 D1 135° 225 ° SB1 PC1 n 180° Y N N/A Were the isolation distances maintained for the new sources of contamination? Is the system monitoring existing nonconforming sources of contamination? Reminder Question: Were the wellhead protection measure(s) implemented? INSPECTOR I Hoerr, Robyn I DATE 1 5-15-2015 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S01 UNIQUE WELL NO, 218032 RECOMMENDED WELLHEAD PROTECTION (WHP) MEASURES WHP MEASURE IMPLEMENTED? Y or N DATE VERIFIED Any sewer lines that are observed to be leaking, cracked, or deteriorated, should be replaced. Best management practices should be employed for outdoor chemical use, to prevent stormwater from moving chemical contaminants to surface waters or where wells could be impacted. COMMENTS The well is located in a building. The well is in a commercial area that is surrounded by commercial /residential buildings, the closest being 55 feet away. There are no known large quantities of hazardous chemicals being stored, prepared, or used within the IWMZ area. For further information, please contact: Minnesota Department of Health Drinking Water Protection Section Source Water Protection Unit P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164 -0975 Section Receptionist: 651 - 201 -4700 Division TDD: 651 - 201 -5797 or MN Relay Service @ 1- 800 - 627 -3529 and ask for 651- 201 -5000 11/6/2015 • +;'� Environmental Health Division Drinking Water Protection Section INNER WELLHEAD MANAGEMENT ZONE (IWMZ) - IIH6 lanrxE iF St Pau L n Minnesota 55164 -0975 POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY (PCSI) REPORT PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION PWS ID NAME ADDRESS 1860012 COMMUNITY Monticello Monticello Water Superintendent, 909 Golf Course Road, Monticello, MN 55362 FACILITY (WELL) INFORMATION NAME FACILITY ID UNIQUE WELL NO. COUNTY Well #2 IS THERE A WELL LOG OR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION S02 INFORMATION AVAILABLE? 236578 0 YES (Please attach a copy) Wright 0 NO 0 UNDETERMINED PWS ID / FACILITY ID j 1860012 S02 UNIQUE WELL N0. 236578 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (�) Community Non - community Aqricultural Related *AC1 Agricultural chemical buried piping 50 50 N *AC2 Agricultural chemical multiple tanks or containers for residential retail sale or use, no single tank or container exceeding, but aggregate volume exceeding 56 gal. or 100 lbs. dry weight 50 50 N ACP Agricultural chemical tank or container with 25 gal. or more or 100 lbs. or more dry weight, or equipment filling or cleaning area without safeguards 150 150 N ACS Agricultural chemical storage or equipment filling or cleaning area with safeguards 100 100 N ACR Agricultural chemical storage or equipment filling or cleaning area with safeguards and roofed 50 50 N ADW Agricultural drainage well' (Class V well - illegal3) 50 50 N AAT Anhydrous ammonia tank (stationary tank) 50 50 N A131 Animal building, feedlot, confinement area, or kennel, 0.1 to 1.0 animal unit (stockyard) 50 20 100/40 N AB2 Animal building or poultry building, including a horse riding area, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 100 N ABS Animal burial area, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 N FWP Animal feeding or watering area within a pasture, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 100 N AF1 Animal feedlot, unroofed, 300 or more animal units (stockyard) 100 100 200 N AF2 Animal feedlot, more than 1.0, but less than 300 animal units (stockyard) 50 50 100 N AMA Animal manure application use discretion use discretion N REN Animal rendering plant 50 50 N MS1 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, unpermitted or noncertified 300 300 600 N MS2 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, approved earthen liner 150 150 300 N MS3 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, approved concrete or composite liner 100 100 200 N MS4 Manure (solid) storage area, not covered with a roof 100 100 200 N OSC Open storage for crops use discretion use discretion N SSTS Related AA1 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system, average flow greater than 10,000 gal. /day 300 300 600 N AA2 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system serving a facility handling infectious or pathological wastes, average flow 10,000 gal. /day or less 150 150 300 N AA3 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system, average flow 10,000 gal. /day or less 50 50 100 N AA4 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system serving multiple family residences or a non - residential facility and has the capacity to serve 20 or more persons per day (Class V well)' 50/300/1504 50/300/1504 100/600/3004 N CSP Cesspool 75 75 150 N AGG Dry well, leaching pit, seepage pit 75 75 150 N *FD1 Floor drain, grate, or trough connected to a buried sewer 50 50 N *FD2 Floor drain, grate, or trough if buried sewer is air - tested, approved materials, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 N *GW1 Gray -water dispersal area 50 50 100 N LC1 Large capacity cesspools (Class V well - illegal)' 75 75 150 N MVW Motor vehicle waste disposal (Class V well - illegal)' illegal illegal N 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S02 UNIQUE WELL NO. 236578 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (?) Community Non - community PR1 Privy, nonportable 50 50 100 N PR2 Portable (privy) or toilet 50 20 N *SF1 Watertight sand filter; peat filter; or constructed wetland 50 50 N SET Septic tank 50 50 N HTK Sewage holding tank, watertight 50 50 N SS1 Sewage sump capacity 100 gal. or more 50 50 N SS2 Sewage sump capacity less than 100 gal., tested, conforming to rule 50 20 N *ST1 Sewage treatment device, watertight 50 50 N SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 100 Y SB2 Sewer, buried, collector, municipal, serving a facility handling infectious or pathological wastes, open - jointed or unapproved materials 50 50 Y 145 N *WB1 Water treatment backwash holding basin, reclaim basin, or surge tank with a direct sewer connection 50 50 N *WB2 Water treatment backwash holding basin, reclaim basin, or surge tank with a backflow protected sewer connection 20 20 N Land Application SPT I Land spreading area for sewage, septage, or sludge 50 50 100 N Solid Waste Related COS Commercial compost site 50 50 N CD1 Construction or demolition debris disposal area 50 50 100 N *HW1 Household solid waste disposal area, single residence 50 50 100 N LF1 Landfill, permitted demolition debris, dump, or mixed municipal solid waste from multiple persons 300 300 600 N SVY Scrap yard 1 50 50 1 1 N SWT Solid waste transfer station 50 50 N Storm Water Related SD1 Storm water drain pipe, 8 inches or greater in diameter 50 20 Y 137 Y- SD1 Storm water drain pipe, 8 inches or greater in diameter 50 20 Y 57 N SWI Storm water drainage we112 (Class V well - illegal') 50 50 N SM1 Storm water pond greater than 5000 gal. 50 35 N Wells and Borings *EB1 Elevator boring, not conforming to rule 50 50 N *EB2 Elevator boring, conforming to rule 20 20 N MON Monitoring well record dist. record dist. N WEL Operating well record dist. record dist. Y 157 UUW Unused, unsealed well or boring 50 50 N General *CR1 Cistern or reservoir, buried, nonpressurized water supply 20 20 N PLM Contaminant plume 50 50 N *CW1 Cooling water pond, industrial 50 50 100 N DC1 Deicing chemicals, bulk road 50 50 100 N *ET1 Electrical transformer storage area, oil - filled 50 50 N GRV Grave or mausoleum 50 50 N GP1 Gravel pocket or French drain for clear water drainage only 20 20 N *HS1 Hazardous substance buried piping 50 50 N HS2 Hazardous substance tank or container, above ground or underground, 56 gal. or more, or 100 lbs. or more dry weight, without safeguards 150 150 N HS3 Hazardous substance tank or container, above ground or underground, 56 gal. or more, or 100 lbs. or more dry weight with safeguards 100 100 N HS4 Hazardous substance multiple storage tanks or containers for residential retail sale or use, no single tank or container exceeding 56 gal. or 100 lbs., but aggregate volume exceeding 50 50 N HWF Highest water or flood level 50 N/A N *HG1 Horizontal ground source closed loop heat exchanger buried piping 50 50 N *HG2 Horizontal ground source closed loop heat exchanger buried piping and horizontal piping, approved materials and heat transfer fluid 50 10 N IWD Industrial waste disposal well (Class V well)' illegal' illegal' N IWS Interceptor, including a flammable waste or sediment 50 50 N OH1 Ordinary high water level of a stream, river, pond, lake, reservoir, or drainage ditch (holds water six months or more) 50 35 N *PP1 Petroleum buried piping 50 50 N 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S02 UNIQUE WELL NO. 236578 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (?) Community Non - community *PP2 Petroleum or crude oil pipeline to a refinery or distribution center 100 100 N PT1 Petroleum tank or container, 1100 gal. or more, without safeguards 150 150 N PT2 Petroleum tank or container, 1100 gal. or more, with safeguards 100 100 N PT3 Petroleum tank or container, buried, between 56 and 1100 gal. 50 50 N PT4 Petroleum tank or container, not buried, between 56 and 1100 gal. 505 20 N Put Pit or unfilled space more than four feet in depth 20 20 N PC1 Pollutant or contaminant that may drain into the soil 50 50 100 Y 110 Y SP1 Swimming pool, in- ground 20 20 N *VH1 Vertical heat exchanger, horizontal piping conforming to rule 50 10 N *VH2 Vertical heat exchanger (vertical) piping, conforming to rule 50 35 N *WR1 Wastewater rapid infiltration basin, municipal or industrial 300 300 600 N *WA1 Wastewater spray irrigation area, municipal or industrial 150 150 300 N *WS1 Wastewater stabilization pond, industrial 150 150 300 N *WS2 Wastewater stabilization pond, municipal, 500 or more gal. /acre /day of leakage 300 300 600 N *WS3 Wastewater stabilization pond, municipal, less than 500 gal. /acre /day of leakage 150 150 300 N *WT1 Wastewater treatment unit tanks, vessels and components (Package plant) 100 100 N *WT2 Water treatment backwash disposal area 50 50 100 N Additional Sources (If there is more than one source listed above, please indicate here). Potential Contamination Sources and Codes Based on Previous Versions of this Form SWD I Storm water drain pipe, 12 inches or greater 1 50 1 20 Y 155 * New potential contaminant source. ** This number is the estimated distance that this potential source is from this well even though it was identified during an inventory for an adjacent well. A sensitive well has less than 50 feet of watertight casing, and which is not cased below a confining layer or confining materials of at least 10' in thickness. 2 These sources, known as Class V underground injection wells, are regulated by the federal U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. a These sources are classified as illegal by Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725. 4 Isolation distance is determined by average flow per day or if a facility handles infectious or pathological wastes. S A community public water - supply well must be a minimum of 50 feet from a petroleum tank or container, unless the tank or container is used for emergency pumping and is located in a room or building separate from the community well; and is of double -wall construction with leak detection between walls; or is protected with secondary containment. This form is based on the new isolation distances in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725, related to wells and borings adopted August 4, 2008, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4720, related to wellhead protection. 11/6/2015 IPWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S02 UNIQUE WELL NO. 236578 SETBACK DISTANCES All potential contaminant sources must be noted on sketch. Record the distance and approximate compass bearing of each potential contaminant source from the well, and identify the source using the "Source Code ". Unlabeled points on the map are unsealed wells. SB1 0° A SB1 A 3150 SWD 450 SD1 ` ` 1 , 50 100 150 20 270° 90° /SB1 \ PC1 225° 135° 180° Y N N/A Were the isolation distances maintained for the new sources of contamination? Is the system monitoring existing nonconforming sources of contamination? Reminder Question: Were the wellhead protection measure(s) implemented? INSPECTOR I Hoerr, Robyn I DATE 1 5-15-2015 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S02 UNIQUE WELL NO. 236578 RECOMMENDED WELLHEAD PROTECTION (WHP) MEASURES WHP MEASURE IMPLEMENTED? Y or N DATE VERIFIED COMMENTS 9/7/2003 - Location for PCSI Type SBA (bearing = 0, distance = 90 , inventory date: 1/27/1999) could not be determined. 9/7/2003 - Location for PCSI Type SWD (bearing = 0, distance = 65 , inventory date: 1/27/1999) could not be determined. 9/7/2003 - Location for PCSI Type GPR (bearing = 0, distance = 30 , inventory date: 1/27/1999) could not be determined. For further information, please contact: Minnesota Department of Health Drinking Water Protection Section Source Water Protection Unit P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164 -0975 Section Receptionist: 651 - 201 -4700 Division TDD: 651 - 201 -5797 or MN Relay Service @ 1- 800 - 627 -3529 and ask for 651- 201 -5000 11/6/2015 • +;'� Environmental Health Division Drinking Water Protection Section INNER WELLHEAD MANAGEMENT ZONE (IWMZ) - IIH6 lanrxE iF St Pau L n Minnesota 55164 -0975 POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY (PCSI) REPORT PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION PWS ID NAME ADDRESS 1860012 COMMUNITY Monticello Monticello Water Superintendent, 909 Golf Course Road, Monticello, MN 55362 FACILITY (WELL) INFORMATION NAME FACILITY ID UNIQUE WELL NO. COUNTY Well #3 IS THERE A WELL LOG OR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION S03 INFORMATION AVAILABLE? 439866 0 YES (Please attach a copy) Wright 0 NO 0 UNDETERMINED PWS ID / FACILITY ID j 1860012 S03 UNIQUE WELL N0. 439866 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (�) Community Non - community Aqricultural Related *AC1 Agricultural chemical buried piping 50 50 N *AC2 Agricultural chemical multiple tanks or containers for residential retail sale or use, no single tank or container exceeding, but aggregate volume exceeding 56 gal. or 100 lbs. dry weight 50 50 N ACP Agricultural chemical tank or container with 25 gal. or more or 100 lbs. or more dry weight, or equipment filling or cleaning area without safeguards 150 150 N ACS Agricultural chemical storage or equipment filling or cleaning area with safeguards 100 100 N ACR Agricultural chemical storage or equipment filling or cleaning area with safeguards and roofed 50 50 N ADW Agricultural drainage well' (Class V well - illegal3) 50 50 N AAT Anhydrous ammonia tank (stationary tank) 50 50 N A131 Animal building, feedlot, confinement area, or kennel, 0.1 to 1.0 animal unit (stockyard) 50 20 100/40 N AB2 Animal building or poultry building, including a horse riding area, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 100 N ABS Animal burial area, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 N FWP Animal feeding or watering area within a pasture, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 100 N AF1 Animal feedlot, unroofed, 300 or more animal units (stockyard) 100 100 200 N AF2 Animal feedlot, more than 1.0, but less than 300 animal units (stockyard) 50 50 100 N AMA Animal manure application use discretion use discretion N REN Animal rendering plant 50 50 N MS1 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, unpermitted or noncertified 300 300 600 N MS2 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, approved earthen liner 150 150 300 N MS3 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, approved concrete or composite liner 100 100 200 N MS4 Manure (solid) storage area, not covered with a roof 100 100 200 N OSC Open storage for crops use discretion use discretion N SSTS Related AA1 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system, average flow greater than 10,000 gal. /day 300 300 600 N AA2 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system serving a facility handling infectious or pathological wastes, average flow 10,000 gal. /day or less 150 150 300 N AA3 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system, average flow 10,000 gal. /day or less 50 50 100 N AA4 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system serving multiple family residences or a non - residential facility and has the capacity to serve 20 or more persons per day (Class V well)' 50/300/1504 50/300/1504 100/600/3004 N CSP Cesspool 75 75 150 N AGG Dry well, leaching pit, seepage pit 75 75 150 N *FD1 Floor drain, grate, or trough connected to a buried sewer 50 50 N *FD2 Floor drain, grate, or trough if buried sewer is air - tested, approved materials, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 N *GW1 Gray -water dispersal area 50 50 100 N LC1 Large capacity cesspools (Class V well - illegal)' 75 75 150 N MVW Motor vehicle waste disposal (Class V well - illegal)' illegal illegal N 11/6/2015 PWS ID /FACILITY ID 1860012 S03 UNIQUE WELL NO. 11439866 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. () Community Non - community PR1 ir- Privy, nonportable 50 50 100 N PR2 j Portable (privy) or toilet 50 20 N *SF1 Watertight sand filter; peat filter; or constructed wetland 50 50 N SET Septic tank 50 50 N HTK Sewage holding tank, watertight 50 50 N SS1 Sewage sump capacity 100 gal. or more 50 50 N SS2 Sewage sump capacity less than 100 gal., tested, conforming to rule 50 20 N *ST1 Sewage treatment device, watertight 50 50 N SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 90 Y SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 135 Y SB2 Sewer, buried, collector, municipal, serving a facility handling infectious or pathological wastes, open - jointed or unapproved materials 50 50 Y 90 Y *WB1 Water treatment backwash holding basin, reclaim basin, or surge tank with a direct sewer connection 50 50 N *WB2 Water treatment backwash holding basin, reclaim basin, or surge tank with a backflow protected sewer connection 20 20 N Land Application SPT I Land spreading area for sewage, septage, or sludge 50 50 100 N Solid Waste Related COS Commercial compost site 50 50 N CD1 Construction or demolition debris disposal area 50 50 100 N *HW1 Household solid waste disposal area, single residence 50 50 100 N LF1 Landfill, permitted demolition debris, dump, or mixed municipal solid waste from multiple persons 300 300 600 N SVY Scrap yard 1 50 50 1 N SWT Solid waste transfer station 50 50 N Storm Water Related SD1 Storm water drain pipe, 8 inches or greater in diameter 50 20 Y 120 Y SWI Storm water drainage well' (Class V well - illegal') 50 50 N SM1 Storm water pond greater than 5000 gal. 50 35 N Wells and Borings *EB1 Elevator boring, not conforming to rule 50 50 N *EB2 Elevator boring, conforming to rule 20 20 N MON Monitoring well record dist. record dist. Y 20 WEL Operating well record dist. record dist. N UUW Unused, unsealed well or boring 50 50 N General *CR1 Cistern or reservoir, buried, nonpressurized water supply 20 20 N PLM Contaminant plume 50 50 N *CW1 Cooling water pond, industrial 50 50 100 N DC1 Deicing chemicals, bulk road 50 50 100 N *ET1 Electrical transformer storage area, oil- filled 50 50 N GRV Grave or mausoleum 50 50 N GP1 Gravel pocket or French drain for clear water drainage only 20 20 N *HS1 Hazardous substance buried piping 50 50 N HS2 Hazardous substance tank or container, above ground or underground, 56 gal. or more, or 100 lbs. or more dry weight, without safeguards 150 150 N HS3 Hazardous substance tank or container, above ground or underground, 56 gal. or more, or 100 lbs. or more dry weight with safeguards 100 100 N HS4 Hazardous substance multiple storage tanks or containers for residential retail sale or use, no single tank or container exceeding 56 gal. or 100 lbs., but aggregate volume exceeding 50 50 N HWF Highest water or flood level 50 N/A N *HG1 Horizontal ground source closed loop heat exchanger buried piping 50 50 N *HG2 Horizontal ground source closed loop heat exchanger buried piping and horizontal piping, approved materials and heat transfer fluid 50 10 N IWD Industrial waste disposal well (Class V well)' illegal' illegal' N IWS Interceptor, including a flammable waste or sediment 50 50 N OH1 Ordinary high water level of a stream, river, pond, lake, reservoir, or drainage ditch (holds water six months or more) 50 35 N 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S03 UNIQUE WELL NO. 439866 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (?) Community Non - community *PP1 Petroleum buried piping 50 50 N *PP2 Petroleum or crude oil pipeline to a refinery or distribution center 100 100 N PT1 Petroleum tank or container, 1100 gal. or more, without safeguards 150 150 N PT2 Petroleum tank or container, 1100 gal. or more, with safeguards 100 100 N PT3 Petroleum tank or container, buried, between 56 and 1100 gal. 50 50 N PT4 Petroleum tank or container, not buried, between 56 and 1100 gal. 505 20 N PU1 Pit or unfilled space more than four feet in depth 20 20 N Pct Pollutant or contaminant that may drain into the soil 50 50 100 N SP1 Swimming pool, in- ground 20 20 N *VH1 Vertical heat exchanger, horizontal piping conforming to rule 50 10 N *VH2 Vertical heat exchanger (vertical) piping, conforming to rule 50 35 N *WR1 Wastewater rapid infiltration basin, municipal or industrial 300 300 600 N *WA1 Wastewater spray irrigation area, municipal or industrial 150 150 300 N *WS1 Wastewater stabilization pond, industrial 150 150 300 N *WS2 Wastewater stabilization pond, municipal, 500 or more gal. /acre /day of leakage 300 300 600 N *WS3 Wastewater stabilization pond, municipal, less than 500 gal. /acre /day of leakage 150 150 300 N *WT1 Wastewater treatment unit tanks, vessels and components (Package plant) 100 100 N *WT2 Water treatment backwash disposal area 50 50 100 N Additional Sources (If there is more than one source listed above, please indicate here). Potential Contamination Sources and Codes Based on Previous Versions of this Form GPR Gravel pocket receiving clear water drainage 30 N/A Y 45 N FFH Fire or flushing hydrant 10 N/A Y 55 1 N * New potential contaminant source. A sensitive well has less than 50 feet of watertight casing, and which is not cased below a confining layer or confining materials of at least 10' in thickness. z These sources, known as Class V underground injection wells, are regulated by the federal U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. s These sources are classified as illegal by Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725. 4 Isolation distance is determined by average flow per day or if a facility handles infectious or pathological wastes. S A community public water - supply well must be a minimum of 50 feet from a petroleum tank or container, unless the tank or container is used for emergency pumping and is located in a room or building separate from the community well; and is of double -wall construction with leak detection between walls; or is protected with secondary containment. This form is based on the new isolation distances in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725, related to wells and borings adopted August 4, 2008, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4720, related to wellhead protection. 11/6/2015 IPWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S03 UNIQUE WELL NO. 1 439866 SETBACK DISTANCES All potential contaminant sources must be noted on sketch. Record the distance and approximate compass bearing of each potential contaminant source from the well, and identify the source using the "Source Code ". Unlabeled points on the map are unsealed wells. 0° 315° 45° PR 2700 90° FFH S =61 SBI SB2 225° 135° 180° Y N N/A Were the isolation distances maintained for the new sources of contamination? Is the system monitoring existing nonconforming sources of contamination? Reminder Question: Were the wellhead protection measure(s) implemented? INSPECTOR I Hoerr, Robyn I DATE 1 5-15-2015 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S03 UNIQUE WELL NO. 439866 RECOMMENDED WELLHEAD PROTECTION (WHP) MEASURES WHP MEASURE IMPLEMENTED? Y or N DATE VERIFIED COMMENTS For further information, please contact: Minnesota Department of Health Drinking Water Protection Section Source Water Protection Unit P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164 -0975 Section Receptionist: 651 - 201 -4700 Division TDD: 651 - 201 -5797 or MN Relay Service @ 1- 800 - 627 -3529 and ask for 651- 201 -5000 11/6/2015 • +;'� Environmental Health Division Drinking Water Protection Section INNER WELLHEAD MANAGEMENT ZONE (IWMZ) - IIH6 lanrxE iF St Pau L n Minnesota 55164 -0975 POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY (PCSI) REPORT PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION PWS ID NAME ADDRESS 1860012 COMMUNITY Monticello Monticello Water Superintendent, 909 Golf Course Road, Monticello, MN 55362 FACILITY (WELL) INFORMATION NAME FACILITY ID UNIQUE WELL NO. COUNTY Well #4 IS THERE A WELL LOG OR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION SO4 INFORMATION AVAILABLE? 449182 0 YES (Please attach a copy) Wright 0 NO 0 UNDETERMINED PWS ID / FACILITY ID j 1860012 SO4 UNIQUE WELL N0. 1449182 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (�) Community Non - community Aqricultural Related *AC1 Agricultural chemical buried piping 50 50 N *AC2 Agricultural chemical multiple tanks or containers for residential retail sale or use, no single tank or container exceeding, but aggregate volume exceeding 56 gal. or 100 lbs. dry weight 50 50 N ACP Agricultural chemical tank or container with 25 gal. or more or 100 lbs. or more dry weight, or equipment filling or cleaning area without safeguards 150 150 N ACS Agricultural chemical storage or equipment filling or cleaning area with safeguards 100 100 N ACR Agricultural chemical storage or equipment filling or cleaning area with safeguards and roofed 50 50 N ADW Agricultural drainage well' (Class V well - illegal3) 50 50 N AAT Anhydrous ammonia tank (stationary tank) 50 50 N A131 Animal building, feedlot, confinement area, or kennel, 0.1 to 1.0 animal unit (stockyard) 50 20 100/40 N AB2 Animal building or poultry building, including a horse riding area, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 100 N ABS Animal burial area, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 N FWP Animal feeding or watering area within a pasture, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 100 N AF1 Animal feedlot, unroofed, 300 or more animal units (stockyard) 100 100 200 N AF2 Animal feedlot, more than 1.0, but less than 300 animal units (stockyard) 50 50 100 N AMA Animal manure application use discretion use discretion N REN Animal rendering plant 50 50 N MS1 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, unpermitted or noncertified 300 300 600 N MS2 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, approved earthen liner 150 150 300 N MS3 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, approved concrete or composite liner 100 100 200 N MS4 Manure (solid) storage area, not covered with a roof 100 100 200 N OSC Open storage for crops use discretion use discretion N SSTS Related AA1 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system, average flow greater than 10,000 gal. /day 300 300 600 N AA2 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system serving a facility handling infectious or pathological wastes, average flow 10,000 gal. /day or less 150 150 300 N AA3 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system, average flow 10,000 gal. /day or less 50 50 100 N AA4 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system serving multiple family residences or a non - residential facility and has the capacity to serve 20 or more persons per day (Class V well)' 50/300/1504 50/300/1504 100/600/3004 N CSP Cesspool 75 75 150 N AGG Dry well, leaching pit, seepage pit 75 75 150 N *FD1 Floor drain, grate, or trough connected to a buried sewer 50 50 N *FD2 Floor drain, grate, or trough if buried sewer is air - tested, approved materials, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 N *GW1 Gray -water dispersal area 50 50 100 N LC1 Large capacity cesspools (Class V well - illegal)' 75 75 150 N MVW Motor vehicle waste disposal (Class V well - illegal)' illegal illegal N 11/6/2015 PWS ID /FACILITY ID 1860012 SO4 UNIQUE WELL NO. 11449182 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. () Community Non - community PR1 ir- Privy, nonportable 50 50 100 N PR2 j Portable (privy) or toilet 50 20 N *SF1 Watertight sand filter; peat filter; or constructed wetland 50 50 N SET Septic tank 50 50 N HTK Sewage holding tank, watertight 50 50 N SS1 Sewage sump capacity 100 gal. or more 50 50 N SS2 Sewage sump capacity less than 100 gal., tested, conforming to rule 50 20 N *ST1 I Sewage treatment device, watertight 50 50 N SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 100 Y SB2 Sewer, buried, collector, municipal, serving a facility handling infectious or pathological wastes, open - jointed or unapproved materials 50 50 Y 73 N *WB1 Water treatment backwash holding basin, reclaim basin, or surge tank with a direct sewer connection 50 50 N *WB2 Water treatment backwash holding basin, reclaim basin, or surge tank with a backflow protected sewer connection 20 20 I N L Land Application SPT I Land spreading area for sewage, septage, or sludge 50 50 100 N Solid Waste Related COS Commercial compost site 50 50 N CD1 Construction or demolition debris disposal area 50 50 100 N *HW1 Household solid waste disposal area, single residence 50 50 100 N LF1 Landfill, permitted demolition debris, dump, or mixed municipal solid waste from multiple persons 300 300 600 N SVY Scrap yard 50 50 N SWT Solid waste transfer station 50 50 N Storm Water Related SDI Storm water drain pipe, 8 inches or greater in diameter 50 20 N SWI Storm water drainage well' (Class V well - illegal') 50 50 N SM1 Storm water pond greater than 5000 gal. 50 35 N Wells and Borinqs *EB1 Elevator boring, not conforming to rule 50 50 N *EB2 Elevator boring, conforming to rule 20 20 N MON Monitoring well record dist. record dist. N WEL Operating well record dist. record dist. Y 46 UUW Unused, unsealed well or boring 50 50 N General *CR1 Cistern or reservoir, buried, nonpressurized water supply 20 20 N PLM Contaminant plume 50 50 N *CW1 Cooling water pond, industrial 50 50 100 N DC1 Deicing chemicals, bulk road 50 50 100 N *ET1 Electrical transformer storage area, oil- filled 50 50 N GRV Grave or mausoleum 50 50 N GP1 Gravel pocket or French drain for clear water drainage only 20 20 N *HS1 Hazardous substance buried piping 50 50 N HS2 Hazardous substance tank or container, above ground or underground, 56 gal. or more, or 100 lbs. or more dry weight, without safeguards 150 150 N HS3 Hazardous substance tank or container, above ground or underground, 56 gal. or more, or 100 lbs. or more dry weight with safeguards 100 100 N HS4 Hazardous substance multiple storage tanks or containers for residential retail sale or use, no single tank or container exceeding 56 gal. or 100 lbs., but aggregate volume exceeding 50 50 N HWF Highest water or flood level 50 N/A N *HG1 Horizontal ground source closed loop heat exchanger buried piping 50 50 N *HG2 Horizontal ground source closed loop heat exchanger buried piping and horizontal piping, approved materials and heat transfer fluid 50 10 N IWD Industrial waste disposal well (Class V well)2 illegal' illegal' N IWS Interceptor, including a flammable waste or sediment 50 50 N OH1 Ordinary high water level of a stream, river, pond, lake, reservoir, or drainage ditch (holds water six months or more) 50 35 N *PP1 Petroleum buried piping 50 50 N *PP2 Petroleum or crude oil pipeline to a refinery or distribution center 100 100 N 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 SO4 UNIQUE WELL NO. 449182 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (?) Community Non - community PT1 Petroleum tank or container, 1100 gal. or more, without safeguards 150 150 N PT2 Petroleum tank or container, 1100 gal. or more, with safeguards 100 100 N PT3 Petroleum tank or container, buried, between 56 and 1100 gal. 50 50 N PT4 Petroleum tank or container, not buried, between 56 and 1100 gal. 505 20 N Put Pit or unfilled space more than four feet in depth 20 20 N PC1 Pollutant or contaminant that may drain into the soil 50 50 100 N SP1 Swimming pool, in- ground 20 20 N *VH1 Vertical heat exchanger, horizontal piping conforming to rule 50 10 N *VH2 Vertical heat exchanger (vertical) piping, conforming to rule 50 35 N *WR1 Wastewater rapid infiltration basin, municipal or industrial 300 300 600 N *WA1 Wastewater spray irrigation area, municipal or industrial 150 150 300 N *WS1 Wastewater stabilization pond, industrial 150 150 300 N *WS2 Wastewater stabilization pond, municipal, 500 or more gal. /acre /day of leakage 300 300 600 N *WS3 Wastewater stabilization pond, municipal, less than 500 gal. /acre /day of leakage 150 150 300 N *WT1 Wastewater treatment unit tanks, vessels and components (Package plant) 100 100 N *WT2 Water treatment backwash disposal area 50 50 100 N Additional Sources (If there is more than one source listed above, please indicate here). Potential Contamination Sources and Codes Based on Previous Versions of this Form none found within 200' of this well. * New potential contaminant source. A sensitive well has less than 50 feet of watertight casing, and which is not cased below a confining layer or confining materials of at least 10' in thickness. These sources, known as Class V underground injection wells, are regulated by the federal U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. a These sources are classified as illegal by Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725. 4 Isolation distance is determined by average flow per day or if a facility handles infectious or pathological wastes. 5 A community public water - supply well must be a minimum of 50 feet from a petroleum tank or container, unless the tank or container is used for emergency pumping and is located in a room or building separate from the community well; and is of double -wall construction with leak detection between walls; or is protected with secondary containment. This form is based on the new isolation distances in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725, related to wells and borings adopted August 4, 2008, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4720, related to wellhead protection. 11/6/2015 IPWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 SO4 UNIQUE WELL NO. 1 449182 SETBACK DISTANCES All potential contaminant sources must be noted on sketch. Record the distance and approximate compass bearing of each potential contaminant source from the well, and identify the source using the "Source Code ". Unlabeled points on the map are unsealed wells. 0° 315° 45° SB2 ' 50 100 150 200 270° 90° 225° 135° 180° Y N N/A Were the isolation distances maintained for the new sources of contamination? Is the system monitoring existing nonconforming sources of contamination? Reminder Question: Were the wellhead protection measure(s) implemented? INSPECTOR I Hoerr, Robyn I DATE 1 5-15-2015 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 SO4 UNIQUE WELL NO. 449182 RECOMMENDED WELLHEAD PROTECTION (WHP) MEASURES WHP MEASURE IMPLEMENTED? Y or N DATE VERIFIED COMMENTS 9/7/2003 - Location for PCSI Type SBA (bearing = 0, distance = 100 , inventory date: 1/27/1999 ) could not be determined. For further information, please contact: Minnesota Department of Health Drinking Water Protection Section Source Water Protection Unit P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164 -0975 Section Receptionist: 651 - 201 -4700 Division TDD: 651 - 201 -5797 or MN Relay Service @ 1- 800 - 627 -3529 and ask for 651- 201 -5000 11/6/2015 • +;'� Environmental Health Division Drinking Water Protection Section INNER WELLHEAD MANAGEMENT ZONE (IWMZ) - IIH6 lanrxE iF St Pau L n Minnesota 55164 -0975 POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY (PCSI) REPORT PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION PWS ID NAME ADDRESS 1860012 COMMUNITY Monticello Monticello Water Superintendent, 909 Golf Course Road, Monticello, MN 55362 FACILITY (WELL) INFORMATION NAME FACILITY ID UNIQUE WELL NO. COUNTY Well #5 IS THERE A WELL LOG OR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION S05 INFORMATION AVAILABLE? 694202 0 YES (Please attach a copy) Wright 0 NO 0 UNDETERMINED PWS ID / FACILITY ID j 1860012 S05 UNIQUE WELL NO. 694202 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (�) Community Non - community Aqricultural Related *AC1 Agricultural chemical buried piping 50 50 N *AC2 Agricultural chemical multiple tanks or containers for residential retail sale or use, no single tank or container exceeding, but aggregate volume exceeding 56 gal. or 100 lbs. dry weight 50 50 N ACP Agricultural chemical tank or container with 25 gal. or more or 100 lbs. or more dry weight, or equipment filling or cleaning area without safeguards 150 150 N ACS Agricultural chemical storage or equipment filling or cleaning area with safeguards 100 100 N ACR Agricultural chemical storage or equipment filling or cleaning area with safeguards and roofed 50 50 N ADW Agricultural drainage well' (Class V well - illegal3) 50 50 N AAT Anhydrous ammonia tank (stationary tank) 50 50 N A131 Animal building, feedlot, confinement area, or kennel, 0.1 to 1.0 animal unit (stockyard) 50 20 100/40 N AB2 Animal building or poultry building, including a horse riding area, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 100 N ABS Animal burial area, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 N FWP Animal feeding or watering area within a pasture, more than 1.0 animal unit 50 50 100 N AF1 Animal feedlot, unroofed, 300 or more animal units (stockyard) 100 100 200 N AF2 Animal feedlot, more than 1.0, but less than 300 animal units (stockyard) 50 50 100 N AMA Animal manure application use discretion use discretion N REN Animal rendering plant 50 50 N MS1 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, unpermitted or noncertified 300 300 600 N MS2 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, approved earthen liner 150 150 300 N MS3 Manure (liquid) storage basin or lagoon, approved concrete or composite liner 100 100 200 N MS4 Manure (solid) storage area, not covered with a roof 100 100 200 N OSC Open storage for crops use discretion use discretion N SSTS Related AA1 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system, average flow greater than 10,000 gal. /day 300 300 600 N AA2 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system serving a facility handling infectious or pathological wastes, average flow 10,000 gal. /day or less 150 150 300 N AA3 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system, average flow 10,000 gal. /day or less 50 50 100 N AA4 Absorption area of a soil dispersal system serving multiple family residences or a non - residential facility and has the capacity to serve 20 or more persons per day (Class V well)' 50/300/1504 50/300/1504 100/600/3004 N CSP Cesspool 75 75 150 N AGG Dry well, leaching pit, seepage pit 75 75 150 N *FD1 Floor drain, grate, or trough connected to a buried sewer 50 50 N *FD2 Floor drain, grate, or trough if buried sewer is air - tested, approved materials, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 N *GW1 Gray -water dispersal area 50 50 100 N LC1 Large capacity cesspools (Class V well - illegal)' 75 75 150 N MVW Motor vehicle waste disposal (Class V well - illegal)' illegal illegal N 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S05 UNIQUE WELL NO. 694202 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (?) Community Non - community PR1 Privy, nonportable 50 50 100 N PR2 Portable (privy) or toilet 50 20 N *SF1 Watertight sand filter; peat filter; or constructed wetland 50 50 N SET Septic tank 50 50 N HTK Sewage holding tank, watertight 50 50 N SS1 Sewage sump capacity 100 gal. or more 50 50 N SS2 Sewage sump capacity less than 100 gal., tested, conforming to rule 50 20 N *ST1 Sewage treatment device, watertight 50 50 N SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 140 Y SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 140 Y SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 145 Y SB1 Sewer, buried, approved materials, tested, serving one building, or two or less single - family residences 50 20 Y 115 Y SB2 Sewer, buried, collector, municipal, serving a facility handling infectious or pathological wastes, open - jointed or unapproved materials 50 50 Y 110 Y SB2 Sewer, buried, collector, municipal, serving a facility handling infectious or pathological wastes, open - jointed or unapproved materials 50 50 Y 125 N *WB1 Water treatment backwash holding basin, reclaim basin, or surge tank with a direct sewer connection 50 50 N *WB2 Water treatment backwash holding basin, reclaim basin, or surge tank with a backflow protected sewer connection 20 20 N Land Application SPT I Land spreading area for sewage, septage, or sludge 50 50 100 N Solid Waste Related COS Commercial compost site 50 50 N CD1 Construction or demolition debris disposal area 50 50 100 N *HW1 Household solid waste disposal area, single residence 50 50 100 N LF1 Landfill, permitted demolition debris, dump, or mixed municipal solid waste from multiple persons 300 300 600 N SVY Scrap yard 1 50 1 50 1 N SWT Solid waste transfer station 50 50 N Storm Water Related SD1 Storm water drain pipe, 8 inches or greater in diameter 50 20 Y 130 Y SWI Storm water drainage well' (Class V well - illegal') 50 50 N SM1 Storm water pond greater than 5000 gal. 50 35 N Wells and Borings *EB1 Elevator boring, not conforming to rule 50 50 N *EB2 Elevator boring, conforming to rule 20 20 N MON Monitoring well record dist. record dist. Y 55 WEL Operating well record dist. record dist. N UUW Unused, unsealed well or boring 50 50 N General *CR1 Cistern or reservoir, buried, nonpressurized water supply 20 20 N PLM Contaminant plume 50 50 N *CW1 Cooling water pond, industrial 50 50 100 N DC1 Deicing chemicals, bulk road 50 50 100 N *ET1 Electrical transformer storage area, oil - filled 50 50 N GRV Grave or mausoleum 50 50 N GP1 Gravel pocket or French drain for clear water drainage only 20 20 N *HS1 Hazardous substance buried piping 50 50 N HS2 Hazardous substance tank or container, above ground or underground, 56 gal. or more, or 100 lbs. or more dry weight, without safeguards 150 150 N HS3 Hazardous substance tank or container, above ground or underground, 56 gal. or more, or 100 lbs. or more dry weight with safeguards 100 100 N HS4 Hazardous substance multiple storage tanks or containers for residential retail sale or use, no single tank or container exceeding 56 gal. or 100 lbs., but aggregate volume exceeding 50 50 N HWF Highest water or flood level 50 N/A N *HG1 Horizontal ground source closed loop heat exchanger buried piping 50 50 N 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S05 UNIQUE WELL NO. 694202 PCSI CODE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION SOURCE ISOLATION DISTANCES (FEET) LOCATION Minimum Distances Sensitive Well' Within 200 Ft. Y / N / U Dist. from Well Est. (?) Community Non - community *HG2 Horizontal ground source closed loop heat exchanger buried piping and horizontal piping, approved materials and heat transfer fluid 50 10 N IWD Industrial waste disposal well (Class V well)2 illegal' illegal' N IWS Interceptor, including a flammable waste or sediment 50 50 N OH1 Ordinary high water level of a stream, river, pond, lake, reservoir, or drainage ditch (holds water six months or more) 50 35 N *PP1 Petroleum buried piping 50 50 N *PP2 Petroleum or crude oil pipeline to a refinery or distribution center 100 100 N PT1 Petroleum tank or container, 1100 gal. or more, without safeguards 150 150 N PT2 Petroleum tank or container, 1100 gal. or more, with safeguards 100 100 N PT3 Petroleum tank or container, buried, between 56 and 1100 gal. 50 50 N PT4 Petroleum tank or container, not buried, between 56 and 1100 gal. 505 20 N PU1 Pit or unfilled space more than four feet in depth 20 20 N PC1 Pollutant or contaminant that may drain into the soil 50 50 100 N SP1 Swimming pool, in- ground 20 20 N *VH1 Vertical heat exchanger, horizontal piping conforming to rule 50 10 N *VH2 Vertical heat exchanger (vertical) piping, conforming to rule 50 35 N *WR1 Wastewater rapid infiltration basin, municipal or industrial 300 300 600 N *WA1 Wastewater spray irrigation area, municipal or industrial 150 150 300 N *WS1 Wastewater stabilization pond, industrial 150 150 300 N *WS2 Wastewater stabilization pond, municipal, 500 or more gal. /acre /day of leakage 300 300 600 N *WS3 Wastewater stabilization pond, municipal, less than 500 gal. /acre /day of leakage 150 150 300 N *WT1 Wastewater treatment unit tanks, vessels and components (Package plant) 100 100 N 'WT2 Water treatment backwash disposal area 50 50 100 N Additional Sources (If there is more than one source listed above, please indicate here). Potential Contamination Sources and Codes Based on Previous Versions of this Form none found within 200' of this well. * New potential contaminant source. I A sensitive well has less than 50 feet of watertight casing, and which is not cased below a confining layer or confining materials of at least 10' in thickness. z These sources, known as Class V underground injection wells, are regulated by the federal U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 3 These sources are classified as illegal by Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725. 4 Isolation distance is determined by average flow per day or if a facility handles infectious or pathological wastes. 5 A community public water - supply well must be a minimum of 50 feet from a petroleum tank or container, unless the tank or container is used for emergency pumping and is located in a room or building separate from the community well; and is of double -wall construction with leak detection between walls; or is protected with secondary containment. This form is based on the new isolation distances in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725, related to wells and borings adopted August 4, 2008, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4720, related to wellhead protection. 11/6/2015 IPWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S05 UNIQUE WELL NO. 694202 SETBACK DISTANCES All potential contaminant sources must be noted on sketch. Record the distance and approximate compass bearing of each potential contaminant source from the well, and identify the source using the "Source Code ". Unlabeled points on the map are unsealed wells. 0° 315° 45° SB2 ` ASBI SD 50 100 15o 2no 270° 90° ' SB2 ` �S B 225° 135° 180° Y N N/A Were the isolation distances maintained for the new sources of contamination? Is the system monitoring existing nonconforming sources of contamination? Reminder Question: Were the wellhead protection measure(s) implemented? INSPECTOR I Hoerr, Robyn I DATE 1 5-15-2015 11/6/2015 PWS ID / FACILITY ID 1860012 S05 UNIQUE WELL NO. 694202 RECOMMENDED WELLHEAD PROTECTION (WHP) MEASURES WHP MEASURE IMPLEMENTED? Y or N DATE VERIFIED COMMENTS For further information, please contact: Minnesota Department of Health Drinking Water Protection Section Source Water Protection Unit P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164 -0975 Section Receptionist: 651 - 201 -4700 Division TDD: 651 - 201 -5797 or MN Relay Service @ 1- 800 - 627 -3529 and ask for 651- 201 -5000 11/6/2015 Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 Appendix E - Consumer Confidence Report (2015) City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494 -880 LGU Review Page 4 2015 CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT Monticello Water Department FACTS and FIGURES Winter water demand is low compared to increased water demands during the summer months, primarily from lawn watering. To ease water use demands, Monticello adopted a lawn watering ordinance, Section 7 -2 -17 Odd /Even • .� Watering Schedule. A home or business address ending in an odd number (1, 3, 5, etc.) may water their lawn on odd numbered calendar days, while Res '�iOnS addresses ending in an even number (0, 2, 4, etc.) may water their lawn on even numbered calendar days. The only deviations to the odd /even watering schedule are apartment complexes and home owner associations that have been assigned odd or even watering days because of the numerous addresses on one sprinkler system. In these cases, the billing address shall be used to determine odd or even. The odd /even schedule is in effect from June 1 through September 30 each year. Residents with newly planted sod, seed, trees or shrubs may apply for a 30 -day exemption permit at City Hall. This permit allows residents to water every day for 30 days. After 30 days, the odd/ Bob Mugaos of the MN Extension Service, even schedule shall resume and no extensions are offered. U of M suggests watering deeply and infrequently during the dry summer I conditions in July and August. Sandy soils hold less water. Applying 2 112" of water per week is the best sandy soil strategy. With an average size hose it takes 1 to 1 112 I hours of watering to apply 1/2" of water. Your watering schedule should be adjusted to account for rainfall. - - - I MONTH I WEEK I DESCRIPTION I Preventing POLLUTION . • • • • • • . . . • . • Many of our daily activities contribute to the pollution of Minnesota's surface water and groundwater. Following are some simple steps you can take to ensure that our water continues to be safe and healthy: JAN 1ST WEEK READ WATER METERS (WHOLE CITY - 4,000 ACCTS) 3,787 58% FEB - CLEAN & INSPECT 750,000 BELOW GROUND 45 3,724 65% 255 RESERVOIR 658 12,840 APRIL 1ST WEEK READ WATER METERS (1ST QTR BILLING, FOR 255 22% 568 12,759 RESIDENTIAL ACCTS. THE USE SETS THE SEWER 3,643 61% 258 24% RATES FOR THE YEAR OR FOR THE NEXT 3 QTRS) 12,759 2 APRIL 2ND WEEK CLEAN & INSPECT 800,000 GAL ABOVE GROUND TANK 23% 659 APRIL 3RD WEEK CLEAN & INSPECT 1 MG WATER TOWER 65% 259 APRIL 4TH WEEK FLUSHING WATER MAINS, STARTING at THE SE END OF 17 3,587 64% 253 TOWN WORKING WEST -TAKES 4 WKS TO COMPLETE 701 12,080 JULY 1ST WEEK READ WATER METERS (2ND QTR BILLING) 242 20% OCT 1ST WEEK READ WATER METERS (3RD QTR BILLING) 3,539 2014 OCT 2ND WEEK FLUSH WATER MAINS, STARTING AT THE 2013 293 3,392 SE END OF TOWN WORKING WEST - 220 23% 546 TAKES 4 WKS TO COMPLETE T 213 3,101 59% _ 2012 JAN 1STWEEK READ WATER METERS (4TH QTR BILLING) 2,988 62% 208 21% 2011 EVUTI, 238 2,699 57% 212 29% 2010 8,261 ®roig 2,561 �, This is especially true in sandy 214 22% 499 S soil. Over watering also results 2009 in the removal of plant nutrients 206 Any extra water applied beyond (some of which you may have 2008 the need of the grass and purchased in the form of moisture holding capacity of the fertilizer) from the zone where 2007 soil moves down and out of the the roots can use it. Excess 2006 root zone of the grass where it watering may also cause disease cannot be used by your lawn. problems in your lawn. 2005 •The most efficient • When h the Bight Time to Water ?� 2004 time to water your lower temperature and 2003 lawn is early in the sunlight. Also, wind morning hours from velocities are usually ' 2002 4 AM - 8 AM Less lower than later into . 2001 water is lost to the day so distribution evaporation due to the of water is improved. 9-000 �r r MONTICELLO STATS 511 12,993 68 3,787 58% 255 22% 592 12,801 45 3,724 65% 255 22% 658 12,840 20 3,660 65% 255 22% 568 12,759 6 3,643 61% 258 24% 593 12,759 2 3,644 63% 257 23% 659 12,530 9 3,639 65% 259 11% 640 12,309 17 3,587 64% 253 21% 701 12,080 44 3,551 67% 242 20% 665 11,527 120 3,539 63% 229 20% 572 10,958 293 3,392 60% 220 23% 546 10,437 213 3,101 59% 212 22% 570 9,403 181 2,988 62% 208 21% 449 8,880 238 2,699 57% 212 29% 513 8,261 247 2,561 58% 214 22% 499 7,868 168 2,259 57% 206 24% • Results of Monitoring • Source of Monticello's Water • Compliance With Natural Primary Drinking Water Regulations • Environmental Protection Agency Standards • Contaminants Which May Be Present In Source Water • Monticello Water Depart- ment Facts and Figures • Monticello Water Dept Calendar Dates • Monticello Stats CITY OF Monticello foot Wolof Qua /ity fo r Ui e ye a r 2014 AC61Y mo&v.,ello Wnter Custovvtrs: Our intention is to advance consumer understanding of drinking water and heighten awareness of the need to protect our precious water resources. Therefore, we submit to our consumers: The 17" Annual Report of Water Quality Testing and Analysis. The City of Monticello provides drinking water to its residents from a ground- water source; five wells ranging from 148' to 310' deep. These wells draw water from the Quaternary Buried Artesian and Mt. Simon - Fond Du Lac Aquifers. If consumers wish to obtain the entire source water assessment regarding the drinking water, please call 651 -201 -4700 or 1- 800 - 818 -9318 (then press 5) during normal business hours. You may also view this information online at: www.health. state .mn.us /divs /eh /water /swp /swa FA In reviewing test results, consumers can see that Monticello's water meets federal standards established by the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). It is important to remember that all drinking water, including bottled water, contains small amounts of minerals, trace elements and other contaminants that pose no health risk. Your comments and questions about the City of Monticello's drinking water are welcome. Furthermore, if you would like information about opportunities for public participation in decisions that may affect the quality of the water, please contact us at (763) 295 -3170. Thank You, Matt Theisen Monticello Water Superintendent Page 2 Based on Testing Results from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 Page 3 2015 CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT MuErin";L11" of moniolorl'ong No contaminants were detected at levels that violated federal drinking water standards; however, some contaminants were detected in trace amounts that were below legal limits. The tables that follow show the contaminants that were detected in trace amounts last year. Some contaminants are sampled less frequently than once per year and, as a result, not all contaminants were sampled in 2014. If any of these contaminants were detected the last time they were sampled for, they are included in the table with the date that the detection occurred. ,a . 1- IMPORTANT WATER INFORMATION 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- %* GALLONS DESCRIPTION ' A I LEVEL FOUND KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS CONTAMINANT 2014 AVG TYPICAL SOURCE OF ` 2 minutes before using water for Corrosion of household (UNITS) MCLG MCL RANGE RESULTS CONTAMINANT MCLG Maximum Contaminant Level Goal. I_ associated with service lines and * I deposits. P The level of a contaminant in drinking water ARSENIC (PPB) 0 to ND 7.44 Erosion of natural deposits; Runoff I Corrosion of household below which there is no known or expected risk * * stormwater runoff, and residential water but cannot control the from orchards; Runoff from glass and plumbing systems. to health. MCLG'S allow for a margin of safety. (06/26/2013) Erosion of natural plumbing components. When your P roduction wastes. MCL Maximum Contaminant Level. www.epa.gov /salewater /lead petroleum production, and can also 1m4 CONTAMINANTS The highest level of a contaminant that is BARIUM (PPM) 2 2 N/A .4 Discharge of drilling wastes; Which can be naturally occurring or allowed in drinking water. MCL's are set as (06/26/2013) tion and mining activities. Discharge from metal refineries; I -f close to the MCLG's as feasible using the best T fe Drinking Water Act available treatment technology. additional contaminants that do not : : have MCL's established for them Erosion of natural deposits. and are not required to be monitored under the Safe Drinking : Water Act. Results may be available by calling: MRDL Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level. during normal business hours. '•.. ........................• CITY OF Montice 0 FLUORIDE (PPM) 4 4 1.0- 1.2 1.18 State of MN requires all municipal I MRDLG Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal. water systems to add fluoride to the drinking water to promote strong AL Action Level. The concentration of a teeth; Erosion of natural deposits; I contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers Discharge from fertilizer and aluminum I treatment or other requirement which a water factories. system mustfollow. l� ETIC ACIDS 0 60 3.2 - 5.8 5.8 By- product of drinking water 90% This is the value obtained after disregarding (HAAS) (PPB) (HAAS) disinfection. I LEVEL 10% of the samples taken that had the p highest levels. NITRATE 10.4 10.4 ND -.98 .98 Runoff from fertilizer use; Leaching PPB Parts Per Billion. Which can be expressed as (as Nitrogen) (PPM) from septic tanks, sewage; Erosion of I micrograms per liter (ug /1). I— I natural deposits. I PPM Parts Per Million. Which can be expressed as TTHM (TOTAL 0 80 1 7.8- 11.3 11.3 By- product of drinking water I milligrams per liter (mg /1). TRI HALO METHANES) disinfection ND No Detection. (PPB) N/A Not Applicable. Does Not Apply. I I * This is the value used to determine compliance with federal standards. It sometimes is the highest value detected and sometimes it is an average of all the detected values. If it is an 0, INSTALL PUMP average, it may contain sampling results from the previous year. DATE DEPTH AQUIFER CAPACITY * * While your drinking water meets the EPA standards for arsenic, it does contain low levels # 1 1964 260 Glacial Deposits 1300 GPM of arsenic. EPA's standard balances the current understanding of arsenic's possible health effects against the costs of removing arsenic from drinking water. The EPA continues to # 2 1 970 250 Glacial Deposits 1 300 research the health effects of low levels of arsenic, which is a mineral known to cause , GPM cancer in humans at high concentrations and is linked to other health effects such as skin # 3 1988 310 Bedrock 640 GPM damage and circulatory problems. In all cases, the City of Monticello meets federal standards for water quality # 4 1 988 220 Glacial Deposits 1 800 GPM ` i � — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — � 5 u , .- r_i, ,i no., if. ,,,... ---- MONTICELLO waTll�IQ sTnIQa�IF Testing Results • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 15 5.3 0 OUT OF 30 1.3 1.3 0.41 0 OUT OF 30 TYPICAL SOURCE GALLONS DESCRIPTION 1,000,000 ABOVE GROUND TOWER 800,000 ABOVE GROUND TANK 750,000 BELOW GROUND RESERVOIR Testing Results • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 15 5.3 0 OUT OF 30 1.3 1.3 0.41 0 OUT OF 30 TYPICAL SOURCE If present, elevated levels of hours, you can minimize the OF lead can cause serious health potential for lead exposure by plants, septic systems, agricultural problems, especially for pregnant flushing your tap for 30 seconds to women and young children. 2 minutes before using water for Corrosion of household Lead in drinking water is primarily drinking or cooking. If you are plumbing systems. from materials and components concerned about lead in your Erosion of natural associated with service lines and water, you may wish to have your deposits. P home plumbing. The City of water tested. Information on Pesticides and Herbicides: Monticello is responsible for lead in drinking water, testing Corrosion of household providing high quality drinking methods, and steps you can take stormwater runoff, and residential water but cannot control the to minimize exposure is available plumbing systems. variety of materials used in from the Safe Drinking Water Erosion of natural plumbing components. When your Hotline or at deposits. water has been sitting for several www.epa.gov /salewater /lead petroleum production, and can also 1m4 CONTAMINANTS water runoff, and septic systems. CALORIAE 11 4 4 Water additive used to control microbes. 0.3-0.9 0.43 COMPUANCEwith Natural Primary Drinking water Regulation_ s The sources of drinking water (both tap and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs and wells. As water travels over the surface @ for of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material. Substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity may be present. JOIED Siq,�, E PA PROSE STANDARDS In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prescribes regulations which limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water which must provide the same protection for public health. Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1. 800. 426.4791. Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno- compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV /AIDS, or other immune system disorders. Someelderly and infants can particularly be at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. EPA /CDC guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium are available from the Sale Drinking Water Hotline at 1- 800. 426 -4791. Microbial Contaminants: Such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife. Inorganic Contaminants: Such as salts and metals, which can be naturally occurring or result from urban storm water runoff, industrial i..� or domestic wastewater discharges, a oil and gas production, mining or farming. Pesticides and Herbicides: Which may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban D stormwater runoff, and residential uses. r.l, Organic Chemical Contaminants: 1..1 Including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are by- VA products of industrial processes and petroleum production, and can also 1m4 come from gas stations, urban storm water runoff, and septic systems. Radioactive Contaminants: Which can be naturally occurring or be the result of oil and gas produc- tion and mining activities. -f T fe Drinking Water Act •�. - .- - -1 dL Monitoring may have been done for additional contaminants that do not : : have MCL's established for them and are not required to be monitored under the Safe Drinking : Water Act. Results may be available by calling: 651 -201 -4700 or 1- 800. 818 -9318 during normal business hours. '•.. ........................• CITY OF Montice 0 Wellhead Protection Plan Part II CITY OF Monticello City Council Meeting April 25, zol 6 Outline Background Part 1 Results —What did we learn? Part 2 Scope — What have we completed with this effort? Part 2 Plan of Action - What are we committing to? Next Steps Questions Background MN Rules 4720.51 to 4720.559 Consists of two parts: Part I - Approved by MDH in March 2015 • Completes well and aquifer vulnerability assessment determining that the DWSMA is of low to moderate vulnerability • Delineates the Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) and the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) Part 1 Results City :The DWSMA lies in the cities of Monticello and Big Lake Counties: Sherburne and Wright Part 2 Scope Evaluates Several Data Elements - Geology - Land Use - Public Utility Services - Groundwater Quantity & Quality Inventories Potential Contaminants - All land uses and potential contaminant sources (including wells and tanks) Prepares Management Portion of the Plan - Goals - Plan of Action - Evaluation Part 2 —Goals Goal 1- Maintain or improve current level of water quality Goal Z - Continue to supply sufficient water quantity Goal 3 - Promote activities that protect source water aquifer Goal 4 - Collect data to support future wellhead protection efforts Part 2 Plan of Action Categories • A - Well Management • B - Public Education • C - Storage Tank Management • D - Data Collection • E - Water Conservation • F - Land Use Management • G - Planning and Zoning • H - Implementation • I - Evaluation Example Activities • Newsletters • Website links • Educational brochures • Well maintenance Comment Period Draft Plan sent to local government units for 6o -day review on February Zz, 2oi6. • Wright County, Sherburne County, Big Lake Township, Wright and Sherburne County Soil and Water Conservation District, Department of Health, Metropolitan Council Required Public Hearing • April Z5, zoi6 Next Steps i. City Council Accepts Plan for Submitting to MDH Z. Submit Plan to MDH for Final Approval by May 30, 2o16 3. Formal Adoption of Plan by MDH 4. Implement the Plan of Action • MDH Evaluation every Z 1/2, years • WHPP Amendment every io years Monticello Wellhead Protection Plan Part II � ciry 0 � Monticello Questions? Previous DWSMA City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 4A. Consideration to accept the Northwest Monticello Interchange Land Use Study for inclusion in the Northwest Interchange Study. (NAC /AS) A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND The City Council is asked to accept the completed land use study for the area currently designated "Interchange Planning Area" within the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. As City Council may recall, the land use analysis of the "Interchange Planning Area" is driven by the Council's direction to complete an overall analysis of interchange potential in the Northwest Monticello area. The City's engineering firm, WSB & Associates, received Council approval to complete an interchange study, which will ultimately yield information on where a western interchange (or interchanges) may be located. To complete the interchange siting analysis, a conceptual understanding of land use in the area is required for MnDOT and Federal Highway Administration's review of the interchange locations. In short, land use concepts are needed to support developing the prime alternative for interchange location. The City therefore approved preparation of an analysis of conceptual land uses for the "Interchange Planning Area" in Northwest Monticello by City Planner Northwest Associated Consultants. To begin the study process, NAC met with representatives from the City Council, Planning Commission, IEDC and EDA in public meetings to better understand the issues and policy considerations underlying the interchange planning efforts. The resulting study therefore first outlines the issues and policy principals which were developed and discussed. Based on the identified issues and planning principles, the study document then analyzes four alternative interchange scenarios in terms of conceptual land use: 1. Interchange at Orchard Road 2. Interchange at County Road 39 3. Interchange at Orchard Road and County Road 39 4. No build The study focuses on how the construction of freeway interchanges in the noted scenarios would impact the City's growth and development potential for the Northwest Area. At this time, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is not part of the scope of this analysis. Rather, the study illustrates land use alternatives for the purpose of analyzing interchange locations. At the time an interchange location is identified, the study and concepts would serve as the basis for future comprehensive plan amendments to both the Land Use and Transportation sections of the plan when necessary. City Council Agenda: 04/25/16 The Planning Commission and Industrial and Economic Development Committee have reviewed the document. The Industrial and Economic Development Committee did not make a formal recommendation on the document, but did review and provide comment to NAC on the study. The Planning Commission recommended the acceptance of the study unanimously at its March regular meeting. Pending acceptance of the land use study by the Council, the analysis will then be incorporated into the full interchange study being prepared by WSB & Associates. The scope of the interchange study is included in the supporting documents. With completion of the land use study, the traffic modeling, analysis and agency meetings can commence for the interchange study. Staff had already met with FHWA to obtain their feedback on the purpose and scope of study. The interchange study is anticipated to be complete within 6 months. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to accept the Northwest Monticello Interchange Land Use Study for inclusion in the Northwest Interchange Study. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMNDATION Staff recommends acceptance of the study for incorporation into the larger interchange report. The land use study provides a conceptual understanding of land use patterns resulting from each interchange scenario. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Monticello Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 3 — Land Use, Excerpt B. Draft Northwest Monticello Interchange Land Use Study C. Interchange Study Scope 2 The following are the City's goals for the Greenway: 1. To provide (where possible) a continuous green corridor connecting large community parks and open spaces to neighborhoods, shopping areas, schools and places to work. 2. To connect people to significant places. 3. To protect the community's natural resources (trees, ponds, wetlands, slopes, etc). 4. To create environmentally sensitive development and design. 5. To provide opportunities for corridors for wildlife movement and ecological connections between natural areas. Focus Areas For certain parts of Monticello, the intentions of the Comprehensive Plan cannot be adequately described solely with the land use map and the related category descriptions. The following Focus Areas provide a more detailed examination of the plans and issues in key locations that will shape the future of Monticello. Northwest Monticello This focus area includes the entire northwest corner of the community. The land use objectives in this area include: 1. Encourage development in this part of the community to utilize infrastructure investments and to provide the capacity to develop in high amenity areas. 2. Provide for a variety of housing alternatives based on the natural features and the surrounding land uses. Areas with high natural amenities or proximity to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park should be reserved for move up housing. 3. Expansion of existing Places to Work in a manner that creates more "head of household" jobs. 4. Preserve and promote public use of natural areas, including the establishment of greenway corridors. 5. Identify and preserve key street corridors. Figure 3 -10: Land Use Plan -Northwest Monticello 6. Preserve areas for future Places to Shop and Places to Work around a future highway interchange, if such an interchange proves viable. The Comprehensive Plan envisions that growth will extend westward from existing development. The initial high amenity residential development is expected to occur along the eastern perimeter of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. No Places to Live are planned with the boundaries of this park. Future development will be influenced by the capacity of the street system, including plans for the construction of a highway interchange. The remainder of this section describes the land use issues and objectives for northwest Monticello in greater detail. West Interchange A new interchange with Interstate 94 is a critical variable in the future development of this area. While the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the potential for a future interchange, in 2008 it is only a concept. It 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3 -17 is not part of the State's plans for future highway improvements for this district. This interchange could be a valuable part of the long- term transportation plan for Monticello if it is part of a new river crossing that removes traffic from Highway 25. Without the bridge, the primary benefit is to provide access to this area and expand the development opportunities. The Land Use Plan assumes that the interchange is a future possibility. For this reason, property adjacent to the interstate has been placed into a combination of Places to Live, Work and Shop. The Plan seeks to prevent development from limiting the location of the interchange (or block it) and to preserve the area around the interchange for future commercial, industrial and residential development. Without the access provided by the interchange, commercial, industrial and residential development should not be anticipated in this area. Ideally, the City will pursue additional investigations following the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. These investigations should be designed to resolve some of the unanswered questions related to the interchange. These questions include: ► Where should the interchange be located? ► What is the potential for a new river bridge connection? ► How would the interchange be funded and what are the financial and land use implications for the City? ► What time frame should be used in planning for the improvements? The answers to these questions provide invaluable guidance to future land use and transportation in Monticello. The area included in future planning should not be limited to the property in the Interchange Planning Area land use category. An interchange and the supporting street system has future land use implications for a broader area. Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Another critical factor in the future of the Northwest Area is the former YMCA camp that is being converted into the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. The City and Wright County formed a partnership in 2005 to start purchasing portions of the 1,200 acre YMCA property. As of 2013, 495 acres have been purchased through state grants with another 300 planned for acquisition. The YMCA will lease land at the regional park to run their Camp Manitou Summer Camp. The area around this park is guided for future Places to Live. No residential development should be allowed within the park. The amenity of this land and the regional park provide an excellent setting (around the perimeter of the park) for some of the "upscale" neighborhoods and housing desired by the City. In planning for this park, it is important to look beyond the boundaries of the park and to its context in the broader community. The illustration in Figure 3 -11 highlights several key community development opportunities: ► The City must create connections between the park and other sections of Monticello. ► Building streets in a "parkway" design emphasizes the desired qualities of a regional park and of the surrounding Places to Live and Work. ► The park is a critical piece in creating a "greenway" system that links to the Mississippi River and may, over time, ring the community. Industrial Growth The Northwest area is a critical location for current and future industrial development. The Monticello Business Center, located south of Chelsea Road and west of 90th Street, has already started to be developed as a high amenity environment with protective covenants that address building materials, loading docks, outdoor storage, and landscaping. In order to provide sufficient land for Business Campus uses over the next 25 years, the Comprehensive Plan extends this land use south to the planned expansion of School Boulevard. It is important to recognize that activity generated by business development can create conflicts with residential development. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create both high quality business parks and residential neighborhoods in this area. Careful site 3 -18 1 Land Use City of Monticello Northwest 1 -94 Interchange Study March, 2016 W - y - Land Use Options City of Monticello Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Introduction This report is written in support of the land use plan component of the Northwest Monticello Interchange Study, an effort to document and analyze the potential for interchange locations with Interstate 94 serving the northwest portion of the community. The study includes two such potential locations (County 39 and Orchard Road), and examines whether one or the other of these locations, or both, or neither are justified, and how their addition to the area would impact the regional transportation system. The area is currently included in the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, but is designated for future study. The Plan does not direct any specific land use. LIU t - gaunly Ro JY Wv- M-7 tice o is I'f L'I ' L`:.'i Project Location Map The land use component addresses how alternative locations for an interchange would affect land use projections and assumptions, as well as how those growth expectations would be expected to impact interchange viability. As noted above, with two potential locations, there are four possible scenarios: Orchard Road or County 39 interchanges alone, both interchange locations, or neither location. Process The project commenced with a round of interviews and discussion with staff, and members of various city official groups, including the City Council, Planning Commission, Economic Development Agency, and the Industrial and Economic Development Committee. Meetings were held during mid - December of 201 S. These groups raised a number of potential issues and goals for the interchange study, including a wide ranging assortment of options and land - use related impacts. In addition to the interviews and focus group discussions, staff undertook an inventory of existing land uses and land use regulations in the study area. The study area includes land within the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area, as well as portions of the west side of the City of Monticello. Existing Land Use. Within the Orderly Annexation Area, the predominant land use pattern is agricultural, although limited areas have been developed with rural- residential neighborhoods. Such neighborhoods lie near both proposed interchange locations, and will be affected by either interchange construction, traffic, and /or connections to the local transportation network. Near the Orchard Road location is a scattered collection of rural commercial uses, including a landscape nursery. it Legend Places to Live �' ` -' • �- i Places to Shop I, i Places to Work C Places to Recreate `-� Places for Community iDowntown Muted use Interchange Planning Area Urban Reserve z � ' + b + 41 First L ! Lake Mud Lahti Monticello Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use Map The Bertram Chain of Lakes regional park, currently under planning and development, lies at the southwest edge of the study area. It is connected directly to the potential CSAH 39 overpass location along that County Highway. It is also expected to be connected to the Orchard Road overpass, pending long- term development of the area and needed collector road additions. Within the City limits, the Xcel nuclear generating plant lies at the northwest edge of the study area, near Orchard Road. The Orchard Road location also connects to a ballfield complex and other urban land uses on the west side of the community. The County 39 location includes the west terminus of Chelsea Road, which serves as a collector road south of the I -94 through much of the community. Land uses in this immediate area include business and industrial uses south of the freeway, and low to mid - density residential uses east of the freeway. At the northeast corner of County 39 and freeway lies the Monticello Country Club golf course, specifically its driving range and parking lot area. Project Area Aerial Photo - Google Land Cover. Within the study area, the land cover is comprised of the developed area mentioned above, including a large area of agricultural production area in the MOAA. The area also includes a number of wetland complexes, and a few larger areas of extensive tree cover. Otter Creek drains the Bertram Chain of Lakes park area near the County 39 overpass. Natural Resources Inventory - Minnesota Land Cover Classification System Source: WSB Most significantly, the City has identified (in its Natural Resources Inventory) a natural resource corridor that transects the study area from southeast to northwest. The City's Parks and Open Space Plan utilizes this resource as a major preservation and pathway corridor as a future development route for recreational purposes. LEGEND 1� Projed ;...& ,Y i ti.: III `: fi �T Roads y T.' : • a4 :. Laval 7 Land Covar Classification 4r - a � Developed j � 0 Planted or Maintapned - Forest +rlr + Woodland .. Shubland AS Herbaceous Sparse Vegetation F—=1 VAter l f Natural Resources Inventory - Minnesota Land Cover Classification System Source: WSB Most significantly, the City has identified (in its Natural Resources Inventory) a natural resource corridor that transects the study area from southeast to northwest. The City's Parks and Open Space Plan utilizes this resource as a major preservation and pathway corridor as a future development route for recreational purposes. Draft System Plan Potential Trail Routes *i*M# Primary Pathway Routes Secondary Pathway Routes �,► � r Gomrnunily Park Search Areas cryr r� + Parks • PaA fj Golf Courses Sotvool Pmporty � n �r W P: ' Slver Spm9fi Golloua9a �� 'City-Owned Property ■ OUpr rk I Bike Pathway �* �.na PGA G1 +,, T� j Sidewalk 406. _* Lakes �A. J r•:.i.r IL W I ryll� 'ri JI• City6oundary j= Pareas tL I4 _t r�,�a L Parks:archarea buffer Fal3 -n Park Annexahan Area 1 I m La Y 119E Little WLA Parks and Pathways System Plan Source: NAC Issue Identification. The purpose of identifying issues of the various alternatives is to ensure that the City's long -range planning for transportation and land use make adequate consideration for as many issues as possible. This phase of the study found the following issues to be considered in developing land use scenarios: Infrastructure Issues • Utility infrastructure investments currently in place • Utility infrastructure capacity, and limits of service area • Regional transportation network for connection to new roadways - what is in place, and what new needs would be • Potential river crossing options • Park and Pathway planning and corridors - preservation and enhancements • Options and impacts for farther or longer -range interchange locations and connections Land Use Issues • Existing rural residential areas north of CSAH 39 near 94 • Existing rural residential area south of Orchard Road along Cameron • Existing urban residential area east of 94 along Golf Course Rd • Proximity of Monti Golf Club to interchange at 39 • Proximity of Xcel plant to Orchard Road interchange • Proximity of Xcel ballfields to Orchard Road interchange • Land ownership patterns - Xcel, banks, bankrupts, few large owners with new development interests v. many small owners with existing development • Proximity and /or gateway to BCOL • Development/ redevelopment of Osowski /nursery area • Transitions to rural areas at perimeter • Balancing and /or impacts of added C/I on other existing C/I in other areas of City - pros and cons • Impacts of potential solar farm development • Possible impacts from Sherburne County RR development Environmental Issues • Otter Creek route and floodway impacts • BCOL buffering and impacts • Natural Resource corridor through former Silver Springs site • Protection of prime natural wetland area(s) • Drainage ways through Silver Springs area • Significant tree cover near Orchard Road interchange area • Potential impacts on Mississippi River? Public Policy Issues • Potential economic development aspects - new development v. traffic distribution impacts • Timing and impacts on development of other locations with future payments for other infrastructure (CSAH 18 interchange; Fallon Avenue; etc.) • Growth management policy impacts - pace and quality of development, etc. Policies and Principles Upon completion of the Issues Identification, NAC has worked with city officials and staff to establish plan priorities and goals for City growth, land use, and transportation in the Interchange Study Area. A Policy Plan that identifies these stated goals along with policy statements aimed at achieving these goals will be produced. The goals and policies will be formatted to complement the structure of the current Comprehensive Plan, however, formal Comprehensive Plan amendments would occur once final agency decision are made related to the development of new interchange locations as a separate project. The published policies will give the community a solid, defensible basis for approving or rejecting proposed development requests. Similarly, prioritizing the City's resources can best be accomplished when the goals are clear. The policies and principles guiding the land use analysis are as follows: • Maintain Comprehensive Plan preferences for high - quality development in all categories • Address transitions between land uses • Address traffic generation impacts on existing development • Address long -term impacts of no- interchange option • Plan for more extensive Comp Plan amendment process pending outcome of Interchange Study recommendations • Account for land use intensity impacts of Natural Resource conditions • Prep future plan for financial impacts, including collateral infrastructure demands Concept Planning With the establishment of the relevant land use policies, the study process undertakes an analysis to develop land use plans for the various alternative interchange locations. It should be noted that all configurations are for illustration purposes only, and do not represent final locations, actual interchange design options or other design aspects. The intention is merely to identify the impacts of an interchange in the general area shown on the concept plan. The land use quantities exempt rights of way, significant environmental features (including the natural resources corridor) and wetlands from the land supply calculations. There may be other factors that would affect the actual developable land supply. Concept Plan 1 This concept shows a proposed configuration of the Orchard Road interchange location. The land use pattern identifies a concentration of commercial land uses near the interchange on both sides of the interstate. An interchange in this location supports the potential for connection to a Mississippi River crossing providing access to and from Sherburne County. The river crossing option is purely conceptual at this point, and significant additional study would be necessary to determine the feasibility of such a plan. Medium density residential adjoins the commercial area to the west, and the bulk of the area is shown as low density residential. An area of industrial would lie adjacent to the freeway along a new collector road that parallels the interstate. It is anticipated that land use patterns south of County 39 would remain largely as they are currently planned. Net land use quantities total as follows: Low Density (Single Family) Residential: 1,040 acres Medium Density (Attached) Residential: 146 acres Commercial: Industrial: 193 acres 103 acres Concept 1 supports a gross development area of approximately 1,985 gross acres, with about 1,482 net developable acres. Areas excluded from the gross acreage include major existing or planned rights of way, wetlands and floodplains, areas of significant environmental value, and the natural resources corridor identified in the City's Natural Resources Inventory. The land use plan anticipates strong pressure for commercial development near the Orchard Road interchange, including an absorption of land for commercial purposes to the east /north of the interchange. With the opening of this area for commercial, industrial uses currently planned for the south Highway 25 area of the City would become the primary industrial growth location. Option 1 shows an area of industrial - likely "business park" types of uses, along the Interstate 94 frontage. Mid - density residential is shown in transition surrounding the commercial area at the interchange. Some of this may be comprised of higher- density development capitalizing on freeway access. Lower density residential development would occupy the remainder of the growth area. This plan anticipates a growth potential of approximately 2,300 single family homes and 1,150 attached residential units in the Concept 1 subject area. Concept Plan 2 This concept shows a proposed configuration at the County 39 interchange location. The land use pattern identifies a concentration of commercial land uses near the interchange on both sides of the interstate. The greatest change in current pattern would be an expectation that the rural residential area near the interchange location would see pressure to redevelop in a commercial pattern. Medium density residential adjoins the commercial area to the west along County 39, and the bulk of the area is shown as low density residential. An area of industrial would lie adjacent to the freeway along a new collector road that parallels the interstate. It is anticipated that land use patterns south of County 39 may see additional pressure to extend the current industrial pattern as well. Net land use quantities total as follows: Low Density (Single Family) Residential: 769 acres Medium Density (Attached) Residential: 115 acres Commercial: Industrial: 44 acres 155 acres Concept 2 supports a gross development area of approximately 1,370 gross acres, with about 1,083 net developable acres. Areas excluded from the gross acreage include major existing or planned rights of way, wetlands and floodplains, areas of significant environmental value, and the natural resources corridor identified in the City's Natural Resources Inventory. Commercial development would again be clustered around the interchange area. However, due to existing development patterns and environmental conditions, along with proximity to the Highway 25 commercial corridor, this plan assumes that a much lower level of pressure for commercial acreage would occur. A slightly expanded industrial corridor is foreseen between the County 39 interchange and the Orchard Road overpass, relying on the parallel collector pattern, but without pressure for commercial at Orchard Road, as in the pattern shown in Concept 1. The distances to the interchange location constrict the likely development area at least in the foreseeable future, thus, residential growth areas are less, and primarily driven by proximity to the Bertram Chain of Lakes park area, less so by interchange access. The land use patterns anticipate approximately 1,690 single family homes, and 900 attached units, a total of 2,590 units. Concept Plan 3 This concept shows a proposed configuration of both the Orchard Road and the County 39 location. The land use pattern identifies a concentration of commercial land uses near both interchange locations on both sides of the interstate. It is likely, with this scenario, that the Orchard Road location would also support a significant increase in industrial land uses, which in turn would support additional commercial not anticipated with either of the first two concepts. As with Concept 1, the Orchard Road interchange accommodates the potential for a connection to a river crossing location, in the event such a project were to occur. Medium density residential adjoins the commercial area to the west along County 39, and the remainder of the area is shown as low density residential. An area of industrial would lie adjacent to the freeway along a new collector road that parallels the interstate. Net land use quantities total as follows: Low Density (Single Family) Residential: 940 acres Medium Density (Attached) Residential: 126 acres Commercial: Industrial: 247 acres 303 acres Concept 3 supports a gross development area of approximately 2,246 gross acres, with about 1,616 net developable acres. Areas excluded from the gross acreage include major existing or planned rights of way, wetlands and floodplains, areas of significant environmental value, and the natural resources corridor identified in the City's Natural Resources Inventory. With both interchange locations in place, a greatly expanded service area is foreseen, extending farther west and northwest. The plan anticipates occupying much of the Orchard Road area with commercial, and an expanded industrial pattern to the north. Commercial uses are anticipated in the County 39 area, due to the nature of interchange land use pressure. This pattern would likely have a significant impact on other areas in the city currently set aside for these land uses. It is possible that some of the areas proposed for commercial might be suitable for industrial as well. These decisions would need to be examined at the time the City considers more formal Comprehensive Plan amendments and zoning patterns. This Concept anticipates a residential growth area accommodating approximately 2,070 single family units, and 980 attached units. Concept Plan 4 Concept 4 is a "no interchange" option, and examines the likely development scenario if access to the interstate remains as is, with the only interchanges at TH 25 and CSAH 18. This land use pattern would consist primarily of residential land uses. Due to restricted major access to the east, requiring the use of County 39 to any point in the City's commercial areas, commercial and /or industrial uses in the area would be highly limited. The primary draw to the area would be residential proximity to the Bertram Chain of Lakes park area. This land use feature would be attractive primarily to a residential development pattern. The land use pattern anticipates single family residential to be the dominant land use, with medium density along County 39, north of the park. Net land use quantities total as follows: Low Density (Single Family) Residential: 919 acres Medium Density (Attached) Residential: 73 acres The gross development area in this concept is similar to Concept 2, nearly 1,300 acres, but slightly less net developable acreage, at 992 net acres. Areas excluded from the gross acreage include major existing or planned rights of way, wetlands and floodplains, areas of significant environmental value, and the natural resources corridor identified in the City's Natural Resources Inventory. As noted, the land use pattern is exclusively residential. Total unit count would be approximately 2,020 single family units and 570 attached units. This pattern is dominated by single family residential due to the lack of support for either retail or job- related land uses in close proximity. The higher density development is, as with both commercial and industrial land uses, less attractive without convenient access to the interstate. Summary Four land use scenarios are included in this analysis of potential patterns of development in the northwest Monticello area. The analysis focuses on how the construction of freeway interchanges in either, or both, or two locations would impact the growth and development potential in the area. As noted in the text, there are likely to be impacts of any of these land use patterns on other planned development in the City. The eventual adoption of land use plans and controls will need to anticipate those impacts and make adjustments appropriate to each impacted area. The purpose of this study is to provide a basis for the development of transportation modeling as the City works toward federal and state consideration of new interchange development in Monticello. While a case can be made for alternative patterns to those shown in this study, it is believed that the Concept Plans provide a reasonable expectation on which transportation planning can occur. As the interchange decisions become clearer, more detailed land use planning will be necessary. The four scenarios studies result in the following aggregate land use projections: Concept 1 Concept 2 Concept 3 Concept 4 (Orchard (CSAH 39) (both (no Road) Orchard and interchange) CSAH 39 Gross Acres in 1,985 1,370 2,246 1,295 interchange reach Net Developable 1,482 1,083 1,616 992 Acres in reach Single Family Net 1,040 769 940 919 Acres Units 2,300 1,690 2,070 2020 Medium Density 146 115 126 73 Net Acres Units 1,150 900 980 570 Commercial 193 44 247 0 Retail/ Service Industrial/ 103 155 303 0 Business Park Unnamed Birch Bertram Lake Lpng Lake First Lake Mud Lake i '!I Interchange Map Option #1 Legend Proposed Land Uses Commercial Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,499 Ac. Medium Density Residential 223 Ac. Commercial 248 Ac. Industrial 116 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 1040 Ac. Medium Density Residential 146 Ac. Commercial 193 Ac. Industrial 103 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space i City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads OInterchange Area Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) CParcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 a RTN :1 0 Z 120TH IRIE E; ILL . •� F e o•,•��. to - � < FL�� � ` �' '�. 0 W `� Unnamed 110TH o First Lake o � u C I EST� 100TH Mud Lake Birch ✓ 99TH ♦ �� ELS A g Lake / z 90�� DU DA Bertram Lake J ! 0 0 Interchange Map Option #2 Legend Proposed Land Uses Commercial Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 940 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Commercial 123 Ac. Industrial 184 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 769 Ac. Medium Density Residential 115 Ac. Commercial 44 Ac. Industrial 155 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial O Interchange Area Industrial Parks and Open Space .. I City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads LConcept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) CParcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. PW 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.457.1109 Website www nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County Unnamed Bertram Lake i t IE First Lake; Mud Lake 99TH , fang Lake y ST -., %I Interchange Map Option #3 Legend Proposed Land Uses Commercial Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,235 Ac. Medium Density Residential 140 Ac. Commercial 405 Ac. Industrial 466 Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 941 Ac. Medium Density Residential 127 Ac. Commercial 249 Ac. Industrial 303 Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space i City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads OInterchange Area I Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) CParcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 el Tephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 Unnamed Birch Bertram Lake 110TH 2% \\ \�_ i First Lake j / Mud Lake 99TH i Interchange Map Option #4 No Build Legend Proposed Land Uses Medium Density Residential J Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,172 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 919 Ac. Medium Density Residential 73 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space r-- - - - - -- i City Boundary - - - - -■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels 0 0.25 0.5 1 N Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. FW 4150 Olson Memorial HiphwaV, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Wehsite: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County March 1, 2016 W. C. Birch •y'rYg.6 ' V ' PY-1 kz r i 'r 4:: ul 3 y �{1 oo a Ill a yF'. s� t- II N ", o� 1 ' ■ 1 First Lake i Mud Lak ng Lake Bertram Lake 1 O. Interchange Map Option #1 Legend Proposed Land Uses Commercial Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,499 Ac. Medium Density Residential 223 Ac. Commercial 248 Ac. Industrial 116 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 1040 Ac. Medium Density Residential 146 Ac. Commercial 193 Ac. Industrial 103 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial O Interchange Area Industrial Parks and Open Space i City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) CParcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.n— planning c om Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 i p r IT 0 named e �� w First Lake •�.;\ a Mud Lake Birch . : II • i - j s� I I g Lake Bertram Lake ;1 1 , 3Source. Esn DrgitalGlobe, GeoEye, Ea hstajr'Ge' raphics, E / b s ®,, ©,USG , AEy ,Get Aerogrzid; I�GN IGP, swisstopo, wand fihe GI - User ommu:nit Interchange Map Option #2 Legend Proposed Land Uses Commercial Industrial z Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 940 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Commercial 123 Ac. Industrial 184 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 769 Ac. Medium Density Residential 115 Ac. Commercial 44 Ac. Industrial 155 Ac. Existing Land Uses W//' Commercial O Interchange Area X///Z Industrial Parks and Open Space r--------- i City Boundary i. ....... • - - - - -■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4T60 Olson Memorial Hlghw'ay, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 napping, Telephone: 763957.1100 Website www nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County Interchange Map Option #3 Legend Proposed Land Uses Commercial Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,235 Ac. Medium Density Residential 140 Ac. Commercial 405 Ac. Industrial 466 Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 941 Ac. Medium Density Residential 127 Ac. Commercial 249 Ac. Industrial 303 Existing Land Uses M/ Commercial M// Industrial N/// Parks and Open Space i City Boundary i. ....... . - - - - -■ Proposed Roads OInterchange Area Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) = Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. FW 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 woo AS; + n OWN ,, o�;,v ♦rte, �� - - • ♦.� PRA I R R1E RIVE ` �� Cs ; erg � •`' I ,` IN a �r,.� �*t ✓r G to �y+f `' - s" - 9. Z . ♦, «-�` R /(.F Fes..... . ;named`' _ R R • �° P `�� ��, R0 ,1 39 0 4H ILI S First Lake, //, / /j,`� F9 ;�.,` • r i r .. ..•.. o- _ / r 7TH cc O Mud Lak ;.:100TH 100TH Birch �' �, -� / g Lake � , t. > I DAS Bertram Lake I 5 Interchange Map Option #4 No Build Legend Proposed Land Uses Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,172 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 919 Ac. Medium Density Residential 73 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space r -- - - -- i City Boundary - - - - -■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels 0 0.25 0.5 1 N Miles MIN NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS. INC. OW4150 Olson Memorial HighwaV, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Welosite: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County March 1, 2016 A WSB & Associates, Inc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction Memorandum To: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Angela Schumann, AICP, Community Development Director Shibani Bisson, P.E., City Engineer City of Monticello From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE, Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: January 21, 2015 Re: I -94 Interchange Planning Study Process and Timeline City of Monticello 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 As you requested I have put together a process and timeline to identify a location for additional interchange(s) on I -94 in the City of Monticello. When considering interchange access to the freeway system in or adjacent to the City of Monticello, MnDOT and FHWA are the two primary agencies that will provide direction and ultimate approval. FHWA Guidelines The FHWA guidelines are outlined in the "Interstate System Access Information Guide ". This document outlines eight policy points that need to be addressed in order for FHWA to consider access to the interstate system. Each of the requirements is outlined below. 1. The existing interchanges and/or local roads and streets in the corridor can neither provide the necessary access nor be improved to satisfactorily accommodate the design year (20 year) traffic demands while at the same time providing the access intended by the proposal. 2. All reasonable alternatives for design options, location and transportation system management type improvements (such as ramp metering, mass transit and HOV facilities) have been assessed and provided for if currently justified, or provisions are included for accommodating such facilities if a future need is identified. 3. The proposed access point does not have a significant adverse impact on the safety and operation of the Interstate facility based on an analysis of current and future traffic. The operational analysis for existing conditions shall, particularly in urbanized areas, include analysis of sections of Interstate to and including at least the first adjacent existing or proposed interchange on either side. Crossroads and other roads and streets shall be included in the analysis to the extent necessary to assure their ability to collect and distribute traffic to and from the interchange with new or revised access points. I -94 Interchange Study — Process and Timeline January 21, 2015 Page 2 of 5 4. The proposed access connects to a public road only and will provide for all traffic movements. Less than "full interchanges" for special purposes access for transit vehicles, for HOV's, or into park and ride lots may be considered on a case -by -case basis. The proposed access will be designed to meet or exceed current standards for Federal -aid projects on the Interstate System. 5. The proposal considers and is consistent with local and regional land use and transportation plans. Prior to final approval, all requests for new or revised access must be consistent with the metropolitan and /or statewide transportation plan, as appropriate, the applicable provisions of 23 CFR part 450 and the transportation conformity requirements of 40 CFR parts 51 and 93. 6. In areas where the potential exists for future multiple interchange additions, all requests for new or revised access are supported by a comprehensive Interstate network study with recommendations that address all proposed and desired access within the context of a long -term plan. 7. The request for a new or revised access generated by new or expanded development demonstrates appropriate coordination between the development and related or otherwise required transportation system improvements. 8. The request for new or revised access contains information relative to the planning requirements and the status of the environmental processing of the proposal. Interchange Access Approval Process The Interstate access approval process begins during the scoping phase of the proposed project, before an alternative for the new interchange is selected. The process cannot be completed until after an environmental decision (Categorical Exclusion determination, FONSI or ROD) has been completed. This process requires a report that contains sufficient information to allow MnDOT and FHWA to independently evaluate that all pertinent factors and alternatives have been appropriately considered. The report would at a minimum contain the following sections: I. Introduction and Purpose - The project description explains what is now in place and what changes are proposed. II. Regional Traffic Needs - This section must demonstrate that an access point is required for regional traffic needs and not only to solve local system needs or problems. A benefit /cost analysis may be helpful but is not required. III. Reasonable Alternative - This section is to assure that all reasonable alternatives, including improvements to existing local roads and streets in lieu of new access, have been fully considered. I -94 Interchange Study — Process and Timeline January 21, 2015 Page 3 of 5 IV. Operational Analysis - The purpose of this section is to assure that sufficient operational analyses are made to determine the impact of the added access on the Interstate operation. The analysis method should be agreed to during early coordination. At a minimum, the operational impact on the mainline Interstate between the proposed new access and the adjacent existing interchanges on either side should be analyzed. Preferably, the analysis should extend as far along the mainline and include as many existing interchanges as is necessary to establish the extent and scope of the impacts. Sufficient analysis of the crossroad and even some of the parallel facilities as appropriate must be made to assure that if the new access is approved, the local roads are adequate to handle the new traffic loads. A twenty year design period should be used. V. Access Connections and Design - Partial interchanges will not be allowed except in the most extreme circumstances. When initial construction of only part of an interchange is appropriate, commitments, possibly even purchase of necessary right -of -way during the initial project stage for future completion, must be made. Special purpose access for HOV's, for transit vehicles, or into park and ride lots should be treated as special cases and the movements to be provided decided on a case -by -case basis. Design criteria from AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (Green Book) are to be used. VI. Transportation Land Use Plans - This section should include a discussion of how the current proposal fits into the overall plans for the area, and if it is an addition to the current plans, how it fits and affects the current plans. Added access requests should be consistent with the local agencies' long -range plan and MnDOT's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). VII. Coordination - MnDOT must insure that the highway facilities are developed in an orderly and coordinated manner to serve the public. Generally, this early coordination should occur during the scoping phase of the proposed project, before an alternative for the new interchange is selected. Analysis methods, analysis boundaries and assumptions should be agreed upon. This early coordination should identify any operational problems in proposed alternatives and it should define the analysis necessary for FHWA Interstate Access Request approval. Figure I shows the typical interchange access request and approval process. I -94 Interchange Study — Process and Timeline January 21, 2015 Page 4 of 5 j Review And Comment I I I I I jOccurs In accordance with state policies Iand procedures I Review And Comment Provide Project Need FHWA Coordination / Is The Project No Reasonable? es Preliminary Interstate Access Request Review II `Is The Praject�►` Acceptable In Terms of Operations, Safety, Design and Environment? Yes State Approval Decision Skate. DOT Recommends Approval And Submits to FHWA Division Office Interstate Access Request Review and FHWA Decision On Engineering And Operational Acceptability Determination of Acceptability Subsequent Project Development Phases And FHWA Review Final Approval No End End - -� I I Request j Denied I I ------------- - - - - -- Request Denied Figure 1— FHWA Interstate Access Request and Approval Process I -94 Interchange Study — Process and Timeline January 21, 2015 Page 5 of 5 Recommendation (Determination if access locations are feasible) For the Monticello I -94 Interchange Planning Study it is proposed to bring the project through the initial process and determination by MnDOT and FHWA that the access location is "reasonable ". In order to precede to this point a portion, but not all, of the scoping study outlined above will need to be completed. These sections would include: • Introduction and Purpose • Regional Traffic Needs • Reasonable Alternative • Transportation and Land Use Plans • MnDOT and FHWA Coordination The timeline to complete the initial Study and receive concurrence from MnDOT and FHWA that the location(s) are reasonable would take 6 to 9 months depending on agency review time. The key milestones to complete the initial Interchange Planning Study would be as follows: 1. Meet with MnDOT to discuss plan and process 2. Prepare Introduction and Purpose section of Study 3. Meeting with Monticello TAC 4. Meeting with MnDOT and FHWA to review scope and process 5. Meeting with Xcel to discuss issues and concerns 6. Prepare remaining sections of Study 7. Meeting with Monticello TAC to review draft findings 8. Meeting with Wright County to review draft findings 9. Meeting with City Council at a Work Session to review draft findings 10. Submit Draft Study to MnDOT and FHWA for review 11. Meeting with MnDOT and FHWA to review Study findings and receive comments 12. Prepare final Study including conclusions and recommendations based on comments from MnDOT and FHWA 13. Meeting with Monticello TAC to review final conclusions and recommendations 14. Meeting with City Council to review final conclusions and recommendations and request approval to submit Final Study to MnDOT an FHWA. 15. Submit Final Study to MnDOT and FHWA 16. MnDOT and FHWA determination if interchange location(s) are reasonable Based on the determination from the initial Study, the next step would be to bring the interchange concepts to the public and complete the freeway operations analysis (modeling) for the final Interchange Access Request. Northwest Interchange DRAFT STUDY - LAND USE PATTERNS AND IMPACIS ► Identify Land Use Patterns likely to result from Interchange locations at: ► Orchard Road Area 0o. County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 39 lo. Both Locations ► Neither Location Legend Places to Live iPlaces to Shop I_ 1 `y + Places to Work Places to Recreate Places for Community Ii Ornmtown Mixed. Use Ik Interchange Plan ningArea 9! Urban Reserve r N. t First M ■ 4 Lake Mud J Lake t `t ► Utility infrastructure in place ► Utility infrastructure capacity ► Regional transportation network ► Potential river crossing options ► Park and Pathway planning and corridors ► Options and impacts for farther or longer -range interchange locations ► Existing rural residential areas ► Proximity of Monti Golf Club to interchange at 39 ► Proximity of Xcel plant and ballfields to Orchard Road interchange ► Land ownership patterns Proximity and /or gateway to BCOL ► Development /redevelopment of Osowski /nursery area ► Transitions to rural areas at perimeter ► Impacts of added C/I on other existing C/I ► Impacts of potential solar farm development ► Possible impacts from Sherburne County RR development ► Otter Creek route and floodway impacts ► BCOL buffering and impacts ► Natural Resource corridor ► Protection of prime natural wetlands ► Drainage ways through Silver Springs area ► Significant tree cover near Orchard Road interchange area ► Potential impacts on Mississippi River? ► Potential economic development aspects - new development v. traffic distribution impacts ► Timing and impacts on development of other locations with future payments for other infrastructure (CSAH 18 interchange; Fallon Avenue; etc ► Growth management policy impacts - pace and quality of development, etc. ► Maintain Comprehensive Plan preferences for high - quality development in all categories ► Address transitions between land uses ► Address traffic generation impacts on existing development ► Address long -term impacts of no- interchange option ► Plan for more extensive Comp Plan amendment process pending outcome of Interchange Study recommendations ► Account for land use intensity impacts of Natural Resource conditions ► Prep future plan for financial impacts, including collateral infrastructure demands Interchange Map Option #1 Legend Proposed Land Uses Canmerci� - kataaral m Density R sidentia.1 Single Family Residential GrGes Lary Use Acres: Slra]IE Famly liv_eldenttil 1,499Ar- 1 am D2mty Redden 131 M Ac. Conirnerclal 248 AC. IndmIrtal M Ac. HetLarWUBDAcrsa (exchndee wet areas, greenwap & Rcm, hut1recerpnM98 land where extetlng Mile may be removed): S1rgleFamty ResNen= 104OAc. [Muluum Deray Res EM[31 146 Ac. Cmmerclal 193M. IrPJLS rlal tO3AC. Existing Land Uses P Commercial Irlterchange.Anea I rr�rrsdta6 Parks and Open Space -- -'i My Boundary --- - - - -• Proposed Roads E)-sting Roads Conceopl &eenway (1 C100 FL Crrrkkw) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rhcers, VM[andsj Pares Cr 025 0.5 1 FAles 1�CTM.111 -�tIL S LI LT11T1 Ip:. Sour e: NAC, pr_. Wag &Aasc,'AMghtCold{ February 8, 2G15 1,482 Net Developable Acres ► Net land use quantities total as follows: Low Density (Single Family) Residential: Medium Density (Attached) Residential: Commercial: Industrial: 2,300 SF Homes 1,150 MF Homes 1,040 acres 146 acres 193 acres 103 acres Interchange flap Option #2 Legend Proposed Land User nraercial in rrdustnal Meffium DersityResidenGat Single Family Residevtial Gruae Land M9.Acree= singlefamlr Resklen=94AG. MElum DeraV Raslden 131123 Au. Cawr2rela1 123 Ac. IntlLbtrMl :84 Aa Het LWW U Be Acrea {exi;Ndee wel areas, greernray a RC4. but lm;urparates WW where exleting roada may be removed): Single Fa" Resr9enta "63 Ac WdlDim Gerrih° ResIdF14131 115Ac Grrmmar l31 4c Ac Industrt3l t5c.Ac. Existing Land User. G=rrve.,n—, l IrterchangeArea trviiersmal Parts and Open Space i City Boundary L- -..d --- Proposed Road= Existirg Raads Con" Greenwap f lGOg Ft, rrdwj SW Ar-e s ? Lakes, Rivers, Milarxisj I� Parc8s 11 0.25 0.5 1 M'IIea 8ourm: KAC, Inc, VM d.ASac, -AYMPI County 1,083 Net Developable Acres ► Net land use quantities total as follows: Low Density (Single Family) Residential: Medium Density (Attached) Residential: Commercial: Industrial: 1,690 SF Homes ► 900 MF Homes 769 acres 1 15 acres 44 acres 155 acres Interchange Map Option # Legend Prapased Land Uses Commercia I Mle ki. D..ity ResidentraD Single Family Residential Grace Land Une Acrea- Slrglefamfy RenFAenra11,235Ar- FAeSim Der*ly ReFAdeM131140AC. Cumnnefelal 4476 Ac. Irr]Lslrlal 466 NO Land U as Acres (exctudee wed areas, greenurey & RCM. but Incorporates land whore axlatlng roc #e may be removed): Orgle: FanAy r?esWentV 941 ft- Nledurn Derry ReaJdere1131 12? Ac. f*mff v4al 249 Ac. Intlrr.irlal W3 Existing Land 4Cse5 Commrerroia6 Interchange Area rr+jLrs-trial Parks and Opus Space i City Boundary Proposed Roads Exastrrg Raads Gancegl Greemray {1444 Ft CorriiwA YJW Areas (Latices. Rivers. V&- lands) ?amps I}25 0.5 1 Mlles RDlgt4WklP asraflillb tdhlUl W$il ear, ew.roe.: KA ,Inc.,WVaS& YSSiQh[OmmW FewuarYY 8. 2Ui6 0. 1,616 Net Developable Acres ► Net land use quantities total as follows: Low Density (Single Family) Residential: Medium Density (Attached) Residential: Commercial: Industrial: 2,070 SF Homes ► 980 MF Homes 940 acres 126 acres 247 acres 303 acres Interchange Flap Option #4 No Build Legend Proposed Larud Uses V=-_ _m Density Residential Single Family € esidentiae GraasLand Um Amu: Single Famlly Reskkntal 1,172 Ao. 6Wlum Denarly ResY]entlal 123 Ac. Wtl_and Use Acres 0.%cluiWe wet siren. greanwayr & ROW, butinDdPnratse land where existing furls maybe ramovatll: Single Famlly Resldenfl 91 DAD. rdimilm Densay ResUerread 73As. Existing Land Uses r. Comral I n4t9k3'd.� Parks and Open Space I City Boundary ------ Proposed Rams Existtag Raa.ds Can IC-f?— rviuV(ICCO R. Conidar) %1CMArea5 (Lakes. Rkiers. Vilbdands) FrarcNs ra 025 0.5 1 Plies RoIrTN W#IAT aYSai raTYP s�eNY ULrar.Tl. rwr 8ourcm NAC, Inc., ri!ES &..Amc., %%Mrd. County Warch 1. 2015 ► 992 Net Developable Acres ► Net land use quantities total as follows: ► Low Density (Single Family) Residential: 919 acres ► Medium Density (Attached) Residential: 73 acres ► 2,020 SF Homes ► 570 MF Homes Summary Concept 1 (Orchard Road) Gross Acres in interchange reach Net Developable Acres in reach Single Family Net Acres (Units) Medium Density Net Acres (Units) Commercial Retail /Service Industrial/ Business Park Concept 2 (CSAH 39) Concept 3 (both Orchard and CSAH 39) Concept 4 (no interchange) 4B. 0 City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 Consideration of a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a multiple family attached housing project in the Central Community District (CCD). Applicant: Masters Fifth Avenue (NAC) Property: Lots 1 -3, Block 36, Original Monticello Plat Planning Case Number: 2016-015 REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Rezoning to Planned Unit Development District and PUD Development Stage approval that would accommodate the development of a 23 -unit multiple family residential building in the CCD. Deadline for Decision: May 18th, 2016 Land Use Designation: Places to Work (Comprehensive Plan) Shopping (Embracing Downtown Monticello Plan) Zoning Designation: CCD — Central Community District, Sub-district F-1: West 25 Shopping Sub - District The purpose of the "CCD ", Central Community District, is to provide for a wide variety of land uses, transportation options, and public activities in the downtown Monticello area, and particularly to implement the goals, objectives, and specific directives of the Comprehensive Plan, and in particular, the Embracing Downtown Monticello report and its Design Guidelines uses. The Ordinance identifies the purpose of Planned Unit Development as follows: The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district is to provide greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and non - residential areas in order to maximize public values and achieve more creative development outcomes while remaining economically viable and marketable. This is achieved by undertaking a process that results in a development outcome exceeding that which is typically achievable through the conventional zoning district. The City reserves the right to deny the PUD City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 rezoning and direct the developer to re -apply under the standard applicable zoning district. Current Site Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Mixed Use — Commercial, upper floor residential East: Commercial Office South: Parking, Commercial Retail West: Residential, Low -Mid Density ANALYSIS: Introduction. This request is to rezone the subject property to Planned Unit Development from its current CCD designation. In most CCD areas, the predominant land use is intended to be commercial. An allowance is made for residential uses on upper floors of multi -story buildings. In this case, the applicant seeks to develop a 23 unit residential -only building on the subject property. The applicant suggests that commercial on this site is not viable, and reserving the ground floor for commercial uses cannot be successfully built. Planning Commission Action. The Planning Commission considered the request at a Public Hearing on April 5th, 2016. Previous to the consideration of the Development Stage review, the City Council and Planning Commission reviewed the project at a Concept Stage PUD workshop. At that meeting, the City officials found that residential uses on the ground floor were not an unreasonable request for the subject property, given its lack of frontage on major commercial streets, and changes to the downtown development pattern that have occurred since the Embracing Downtown plan was approved. The applicants made some changes to their site plan (most significant being the arrangement of the detached garages) in response to comments from the public made at the Concept Stage review. The only public comment related to a concern that this would represent a loss of potential commercial property in the downtown area, and that parking in the downtown raises potential conflicts between land uses. The Commission considered the request, examining the threshold questions identified by staff, including (1) whether the site should include ground floor residential, (2) whether the density should reflect more common residential density zoning, and (3) whether the project, if density were to be increased as requested under the PUD, met the intent of PUD both from a land use and site planning perspective. City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 The Commission reiterated the observations of the concept review, including that the site would not appear to be an attractive property for commercial purposes. Moreover, the Commission expressed satisfaction that the site includes adequate parking to avoid concerns over parking conflicts with neighboring property. Following the discussion, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed PUD zoning and Development Stage PUD and site plan, incorporating the conditions recommended by staff relating to changes to the garage design, and other conditions of approval. The establishment of a planned unit development is a rezoning action of the City. Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 2, Section (4)(0)(9)(b) requires that the ordinance for rezoning to PUD be drafted for review of the City Council with the development stage PUD consideration. However, consideration of adoption of the ordinance for rezoning occurs with the final stage PUD review by the Council. Therefore, the Planning Commission held the required public hearing on the rezoning action on April 5th (with their review of the development stage application) and an ordinance for rezoning has been prepared for City Council review as required. Again, consideration to adopt the ordinance for rezoning would occur in conjunction with the consideration of the final stage PUD. Project Description. The downtown planning done by the City emphasizes commercial activities, with a mixed -use component. The mixed uses include residential as noted, along with civic and institutional uses, public open space, and existing employment - based businesses such as Cargill. Entertainment and tourism -based business are included in this mix. The Embracing Downtown guide plan labels the subject site as "Shopping ", and the downtown design concept designates the site for support uses, including parking, for larger retailing areas on adjoining land. It is noted that recent projects on the adjacent blocks have lessened the viability of this concept plan. It should be noted that the City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan included the following statements in its incorporation of the 2008 Embracing Plan: "Downtown in intended to be an inter - connected and supportive collection of land uses ..." and "Housing in the Downtown can facilitate necessary redevelopment and bring potential customers directly into the area. Housing may be free - standing or in shared buildings with street level commercial uses ". Residential uses are encouraged throughout the downtown for many reasons. First, they contribute to building a primary market for the retail orientation of the downtown area. Second, residential use creates a "24 -7" activity level that is important to vibrant downtown retailing. Third, residential uses tend to be more stable than specific commercial uses over time. Finally, residential activity encourages full -time use of the entertainment and civic /public areas in the downtown, decreasing the seasonal issues that are faced by some of these facilities. 3 City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 Further, the zoning ordinance accommodates the potential for ground -floor residential uses within the CCD in certain areas through the technique of an overlay zoning district. That district is designed to be used on a case -by -case basis, when the City finds that a specific location is not suitable for commercial, or where a more intense residential use is compatible with the overall goals of the City's downtown land use goals. That overlay district approach was initially considered by the applicant on the subject property However, the limitations of density on this .76 acre parcel were judged inadequate to support the developer's financial requirements. As discussed in reviewing the initial concept residential request, it was noted that the zoning ordinance could not be read to accommodate more than about 18 units on the site, whereas the applicant was seeking 23 units on three floors, including both dwelling units and common areas on the ground floor. Although the proposed density exceeds the base limitations of the ordinance, most other zoning requirements can be met by the proposed three story building. With the density limitation as an obstacle, the applicant has chosen to pursue a parallel option for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District. Under a PUD, the City is free to consider departures from the standard zoning regulations where the overall project design can do a better job of achieving the City's land use development and redevelopment objectives in the area. Thus, the question for the City in the present case is whether the project design proposed by the developer meets that standard. The project now before the City is a three -story building at the corner of Locust and Yd Street, with a mix of common areas and residential units on the ground floor, residential units on the upper two floors, and a combination of open and covered parking along the north and east boundaries of the site. In reviewing the project, staff discussion has raised concern that the project, particularly with the detached garage structures, is inconsistent with the more urban downtown concept, and instead is more consistent with a "suburban" style of development. The preference would be for covered parking that is integrated into the principal structure. The gabled -roof design of the garage buildings contributes to this concern. Staff notes the developer's objections to this layout in which it is stated that the increased costs of integrated parking (whether underground or occupying the at -grade first level of the building) are not recoverable for a building of this size. Staff's response to this concern is to consider a larger project of more units to offset those additional costs. It is acknowledged that an increase in units would complicate the parking requirements on the site, as well as increase the building height, perhaps significantly. As noted above, the standard for PUD zoning is whether the departures from standard zoning leads to a project that does a better job of accomplishing the development goals on the property in question. Staff's suggestion in this case is that to utilize PUD zoning to convert the site from commercial to a residential -only project, the design should better al City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 reflect urban building design and site planning. How those goals are achieved form the core of the issue facing the City with this request. The decision facing the City in this can be illustrated as follows: Should Ground Floor Residential be built on this site? quir Residential t7verlay (18 Units] ar f't!D [rno th ra 1 Kl j u <3P Action, Deny PUa and retain Current Zoning Residential overlay Redesign to P {' D: maximum 18 units ConsFder current Project. OR, require changes to meet Embracing bowntown goals_ Current project (23 du) IL Identify architectural and site plan conditions for PUID approval. Allow PUD, but with significant changes more consistent with urban design (more units, attached parking, etc -) The City Council and Planning Commission met in a joint workshop to consider the concept of the 23 -unit project, including detached garages. At the concept level the design of the garages was not clear from the submitted plans. The discussion at the concept review workshop indicated that the City was interested in pursuing residential on the site as proposed, and a willingness to consider the site plan proposed by the applicant. As noted, there were a number of issues that were discussed at the concept level. At the workshop, the two primary site planning issues were noted - how the garage buildings may be moved to accommodate more visibility of the commercial buildings along 5 City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 Broadway, and parking supply. It was suggested that both architecture and building materials would be important in the ongoing review of the project. Parking requirements and proposed supply are discussed later in this report. Additionally, there were specific elements noted that suggest a residential project on this site would be appropriate, including the following: • Introduction of additional residential population to the downtown; • Design of the building floor plan emphasizing more public uses toward 3rd Street; • Adequate parking to avoid spillover to adjoining streets or private property; • Consistency with the direction of more recent downtown redevelopment patterns (notwithstanding the more specific details of the Embracing Downtown plan). • Positive transition between commercial downtown along Walnut Street on the east, to residential areas farther to the west. If the City Council believes that either the project should be more dense and urban in nature as discussed by staff, or ground floor uses should remain devoted to commercial use, the Commission would not want to recommend approval of the rezoning to PUD. If it is the intent of City officials to allow the PUD zoning for additional density on the site, an alternative has also been provided. This alternative incorporates the idea that the intent is to both (1) Accommodate ground floor residential on the property; and (2) Exceed the base density standards allowed by the CCD- Residential Overlay District. Presuming that the PUD zoning is the preferred result, a review of the site and building plans as proposed by the developer follows below. PUD Development Stage - Site Plan Review Lot Size. The Planned Unit Development District does not specify a minimum lot size. The subject property is .76 acres in area, a total of about 32,920 square feet. Densily. As noted in the policy discussion above, the proposal contains 23 dwelling units, a net density of about 30 units per acre, or 1,431 square feet of lot area per unit. Using density caps in other districts as a comparison, the maximum density would be up to 25 units per acre in the R -4 District, resulting in a maximum unit count on this site of 18 units if that district were applied here. The R -4 is designed, however, as a more "suburban" district, with extensive areas of green space. The proposed location in the CCD for this project is an urban site, governed by the goals and policies of the City's downtown planning. Unit Size. The PUD District does not have a specific standard for residential unit sizes. For reference, the recently adopted R -4 District utilizes a minimum of 900 square feet per unit as its baseline. The proposed building units average 870 square feet per unit, with 13 of the 23 units larger than this threshold. Con City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 Lot Coverage. The proposed building is about 8,600 square feet in size, just over 25% of the lot area. For comparison, the zoning ordinance requires a minimum lot coverage in the CCD of 20 %. The site plan shows about 6,000 square feet of green area, about 18% of the lot. The garage buildings cover about 12% of the parcel. The remaining 45% is sidewalk, parking, and driveway pavement. Off - Street Parking. Parking supply for the site is proposed at 35 parking spaces, 16 of which are covered in the detached garages. The plan provides for an additional 8 angle on- street spaces along 3rd Street, and the Locust Street frontage has capacity for an additional 4 parallel on- street spaces. (The on- street spaces are considered public parking.) This is a total of 47 spaces available directly on or adjacent to the site, more than 2 per unit. The standard requirement for multiple family residential in the CCD Residential Overlay District is 1.5 spaces per unit. The standard code requirement for multiple - family residential senior housing is 1.0 spaces per unit. In addition, the CCD District accommodates a reduction in this requirement when the parking area is open to public use. It is not anticipated that the proposed lot will be open to public use, however, the applicants indicate that they have designed the facility to serve a senior market, with an expectation that most residents will be more than 60 years in age. It is noted that a commercial project on this site of similar size (8,500 square feet of floor area), would create a parking demand of at least 34 spaces for a single story building, with restaurant use nearly doubling that requirement. Detached Garages. As notes, the applicant has provided 16 parking spaces in two detached garage buildings. The garage design in the plan shows a hipped roof design with horizontal lapped siding. Staff notes that the proposed design is characteristic of a suburban residential design, and is not consistent with the design of the principal building, which is flat roofed with cornice treatments at the parapet, and a mix of masonry and lapped siding. To meet the downtown design guidelines and be consistent with the urban location, staff suggests that the garage buildings should mimic the principal building in both design and materials. One of the items noted in early discussions was concern related to the long flat wall of the back side of the garage buildings. Staff believes that this wall should be broken up through the use of alternate materials and varying building fagade lines. One option may be to break the garage buildings into three or four smaller structures. Landscaping. A variety of planting have been proposed on the site, including plantings along the perimeter of the site, within off - street parking areas and around the perimeter of the building. In regard to site landscaping, the following comments are offered. 7 City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 Caliper Inch Requirements. According to the Ordinance, 16 caliper inches (ACI) of landscaping must be provided for each acre of site area, plus 2 shrubs per 10 feet of building perimeter. Thus, the landscaping requirement for the .76 acre site would be 12 caliper inches of trees, and a total of 84 shrubs for the 418 feet of building perimeter. The landscaping plan shows 13.5 caliper inches of trees, and 120 shrubs, more than the requirement. Staff notes that this planting includes two Honeylocust overstory trees in the public sidewalk along Locust Street. Staff and the Parks Commission would recommend two additional hardwood trees along 3rd Street where suitable planting locations can be found. Ground Cover. As noted, about 18% of the site is green space, including the planting areas and lawn grass. The applicants have noted that the landscaped areas will be irrigated. Buffer Yards. The City's zoning ordinance provides for a specific buffer yard treatment, but notes that uses in the CCD District are exempt. Nonetheless, the applicant's plan includes landscape plantings along the west boundary (Locust Street) where residential uses are most likely to be developed in the future. Building Finish Materials. The zoning ordinance provides that: In the downtown design guidelines from the Embracing Downtown plan, buildings are to be constructed with the first floor dominated by glass, and a minimum of 25% of all facades of the building covered with masonry or glass material. The building meets or exceeds these minimums at a minimum of 29% coverage. Also — the design guidelines state "Secondary materials such as decorative concrete block, precast panels, EIFS or standing seam metal shall be allowed on the remaining 75 % ". The applicants are seeking a departure from the limitations by incorporating lapped siding on a portion of each wall. The City Council may consider the use of lapped siding acceptable on a residential PUD building, but should be of a durable design. The applicants note that they intent to use "LP" siding, a suitable material that is much more durable than vinyl or aluminum. Each unit has access to a patio (ground floor) or deck (upper floors). The deck fencing appears to be iron railings, but is not specified on the plan. Materials shall be specified and be consistent with Embracing Downtown design guidelines. Site Amenities. As shown on the site plan, an interior courtyard area is proposed to provide an outdoor space to residents. As is typical in a downtown space, it is expected that use will be made of the accessible public spaces and buildings in the immediate area. N. City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 The plans identify public sidewalk paving intended to reflect the design and materials utilized in the Walnut Street streetscape, including stamped concrete paving, lighting, and other features. The staff report recommends extension of these improvements to connect to Walnut along Yd Street, and an extension along Locust Street to the public sidewalk in Landmark I (Beef O'Brady's). Transitional Features. In certain circumstances, the zoning ordinance imposes a transitional requirement on development that is substantively different in intensity that that of neighboring or facing land uses. The ordinance requires that similar features abut each other, including parking areas, building massing, building height, or conflicting land uses. For the subject site, parking lots abut the property to the east and north, and lie across Third Street to the south. The applicant has laid out the parking areas adjacent to those abutting parking areas (east and north), along with a portion of the garage space (also abutting to the north property line). With regard to building height, the building to the east is 2 stories, and to north, 3 stories. As noted, parking area dominates the property to the south. To the west, the area is zoning CCD (F3), in which a wide variety of commercial and residential uses are allowed, with residential uses dominated by requirements for Conditional Use Permit. The proposed site plan appears to be consistent with the Transitional Features described in the ordinance. Trash/Recycling. The applicant has proposed a detached trash handling enclosure in the northeast corner of the site which would be access from the alley to the north. The access to the residents should be designed to create a screened entrance, rather than the open passage now shown. Lighting. A separate site lighting plan is not included in the plan set. Building elevations indicate wall- mounted lighting outside the individual units. Sig_nage. A wall sign is proposed in the southeast corner of the building facing 3rd Street. The total square footage of the sign is 40 square feet. Residential zones are permitted 32 square feet for project identification signs. The sign should be reduced slightly to meet this standard. Grading and Utilities. The submitted grading and utility plans should be subject to review comment by the City Engineer. Other Notes. Staff had cited some preliminary site plan and architectural items for discussion during the concept review of the proposal with Planning Commission and City Council, in addition to the density issue. Those were as follows: 9 City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 1. Include the City's patterned pavement design in the sidewalks along both Yd Street and Locust, similar to the on- street parking areas along Walnut. 2. Extend pedestrian access sidewalk to Walnut to connect the residential to the commercial core. 3. Extend the on- street angled parking on Yd Street farther east (2 -3 more spaces ?) 4. Add street lighting to coordinate with Walnut Street theme. 5. Consider adjusting garage buildings along Dan Olsen's State Farm property to the east back from the existing curb by 2 feet or so. 6. Ensure that garage buildings are attractive amenities to the site — varied roof lines and enhanced materials — the code requirement for residential in the CCD says all walls up to 12 feet are to be brick, stone, or glass. Garage walls should not be designed as a blank flat wall. 7. Ensure that site is separated from Landmark I by curb and landscaped area. 8. Potentially other elements based on final design. The applicant has incorporated many of these into the Development Stage PUD proposal. However, the scale of the project, the garage buildings and some of the building design items continue to raise an issue for staff. These issues are reflected in the divergent options for PUD on this site. Staff's alternative option would require the covered parking to be incorporated into the building design. To acknowledge the applicant's concerns over cost, staff would encourage the accommodation of an even higher density. Following the applicant's option, the garages would remain detached, and the primary issue then becomes a site planning and design issue. These issues are addressed in the list of Exhibit Z conditions. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of a Development Stage PUD to accommodate the construction of a 23 -unit multiple family residential building and associated site improvements, parking and garage buildings. The Planning Commission recommends Alternative 1 below. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2016 -026 approving the Development Stage PUD based on the findings in said resolution, and contingent on compliance with the conditions as listed. 10 City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No.2016 -026, suggesting instead that the applicant instead pursue rezoning to CCD- Residential Overlay, based on findings identified by the City Council at the meeting. 3. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2016 -026, finding instead that the current zoning (CCD, F -1) is retained and that ground floor residential is not permitted on the subject property, based on findings identified by the City Council at the public hearing. 4. Motion to table action on Resolution No.2016 -026_, pending submission of additional material from the applicant, public, and /or staff. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The decision is a policy question for the City. The first issue for the City Council, as with the Planning Commission, will be to consider this question: 1. Is the proposed project, with the conditions considered and identified by staff and the Commission, consistent with the goals and objectives of the Embracing Downtown Monticello planning documents, as well as the purpose and requirements of Planned Unit Development zoning? If so, Alternative 1, with the conditions in Exhibit Z, is the appropriate option. Alternatives 2 and 3 provide considerations that result in a lower density (Alternative 2), or a continued requirement for commercial on the ground floor (Alternative 3). The applicants have stated that these alternatives are financially unfeasible, although the initial rezoning request as accommodated by Alternative 2 is still technically active. The applicants note that due to lack of exposure, commercial use of the subject property is highly unlikely. It is also noted that the Embracing Downtown project envisioned that this parcel was designated for "Shopping ", but was identified primarily as parking area in support of a larger commercial development that would occur on adjacent property. That project appears to be unlikely in the foreseeable future, based on other recent development. As such, the specific requirement for commercial use of this site may be less of an imperative that the land use concepts direct. The applicants have further stated that staff's interest in increasing density and requiring parking underneath the building (rather than in detached garages) is also impractical for reasons related to building code, as well as the fact that increased density also increases the parking requirements for the site, spiraling the parking supply problem further upward. As such, the applicants have pursued the current layout, using PUD zoning to address fiscal realities of the project. 11 City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 D. SUPPORTING DATA • Exhibit Z — Conditions of Approval • Resolution 2016 -026 • Ordinance No. 639 • Resolution PC- 2016 -006 • Aerial Parcel Image • Applicant Narrative • Site Plan • First Floor Plan • Second Floor Plan • Third Floor Plan • Building Section Plan • Exterior Building Elevations • Garage Elevations • Landscape Plan • Civil Plans, including: a. Details b. Grading Plan c. SWPPP d. Utility & Paving Plan • Survey • City Engineer's Comment Letter • Monticello Comprehensive Plan — Embracing Downtown Zoning Sub - Districts • Monticello Comprehensive Plan — Embracing Downtown Design Guidelines, Excerpt • Monticello Comprehensive Plan — Chapter 3, Land Use, Excerpt 12 City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 EXHIBIT Z Rezoning to Planned Unit Development and PUD Development Stage Site Plan Review Lots 1 -3, Block 36, Original Monticello Plat Conditions of Approval Redesign of the detached garage buildings to provide the following: a. Flat- roofed design b. Variable roof heights c. Materials reflective of those on the principal building d. Variable wall facades facing adjoining properties 2. Redesign of building entrance points to incorporate flat - roofed design. 3. Deck materials shall be consistent with Embracing Downtown Guidelines. 4. Provision of on- street parking along 3rd Street as noted on approved site plan. 5. Add tree planting to sidewalk along Yd Street similar to proposed planting on Locust Street. 6. Extend sidewalk from project to Walnut Street along Yd Street. 7. Extend sidewalk along Locust Street to meet existing sidewalk to north. 8. Utilize sidewalk materials consistent with Walnut Streetscape improvements. 9. Ensure lapped siding is "LP ", cement board, or better, with no wood, vinyl or aluminum. 10. Revise trash enclosure to provide a visual barrier at the access point from the parking lot. 11. Provide lighting plans that meet the zoning ordinance requirements, and utilize materials and elements consistent with Walnut Streetscape. 12. Reduce wall sign size to 32 square feet, consistent with ordinance allowances. 13. Provide a current topographic survey and prepare grading, drainage, and utility plans consistent with the requirements and comments from the City Engineer in the Engineer's letter dated March 30th, 2016. 13 City Council Agenda — 4/25/16 14. Other comments of the Planning Commission and Staff provided at the Public Hearing. 14 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING DEVELOPMENT STAGE PUD FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 23 UNIT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED USES ON THE FOLLOWING PARCEL: LOTS 1 -3, BLOCK 36, MONTICELLO WHEREAS, Masters 5th Avenue has submitted an application for approval of a rezoning and Development Stage PUD to construct a 23 -unit residential building on the subject property; and WHEREAS, the property in question is guided for commercial uses under the "Downtown" category in the Monticello Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the property in question is current zoned CCD, Sub - district F -1, Central Community District according to the official Monticello zoning map and ordinance; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning will accommodate flexibility from the otherwise applicable regulations to allow a development project consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed project will meet the goals and policies of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, including the Embracing Downtown chapter, as well as the Zoning Ordinance encouraging downtown development that supports a vibrant and growing mixed -use environment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 5, 2016 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello hereby makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed project complies with the intent of the use of Planned Unit Development in that the flexibility offered under PUD is utilized to further the objectives for the area within the City Comprehensive Plan. 2. With conditions, Development Stage PUD plans meet all applicable requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 3. Except as otherwise allowed per PUD flexibility, all applicable requirements performance standards of the City's Zoning Ordinance will be satisfied. 4. The addition of residential units to the downtown is consistent with the City's redevelopment objectives. 5. The residential project on the subject site contributes to a reasonable transition of land uses between the commercial core and residential neighborhoods to the west. 6. Building design, including common areas on the ground floor, complies with the general intent to limit ground floor residential uses in the area. 7. Building materials, including extensive glass and masonry, is consistent with the requirements of the zoning ordinance and downtown development objectives. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Monticello City Council hereby approves the development stage planned unit development (PUD)for construction of a 23 unit residential building as recommended by the Planning Commission, subject to compliance with related codes and regulations for such use, and the following conditions: Redesign of the detached garage buildings to provide the following: a. Flat- roofed design b. Variable roof heights c. Materials reflective of those on the principal building d. Variable wall facades facing adjoining properties 2. Provision of on- street parking along 3rd Street as noted on approved site plan. 3. Add tree planting to sidewalk along 3rd Street similar to proposed planting on Locust Street. 4. Extend sidewalk from project to Walnut Street along 3rd Street. 5. Extend sidewalk along Locust Street to meet existing sidewalk to north. 6. Utilize sidewalk materials consistent with Walnut Streetscape improvements. 7. Ensure lapped siding is "LP ", cement board, or better, with no wood, vinyl or aluminum. 8. Revise trash enclosure to provide a visual barrier at the access point from the parking lot. 9. Provide lighting plans that meet the zoning ordinance requirements, and utilize materials and elements consistent with Walnut Streetscape. 10. Reduce wall sign size to 32 square feet, consistent with ordinance allowances. 11. Provide a current topographic survey and prepare grading, drainage, and utility plans consistent with the requirements and comments from the City Engineer in the Engineer's letter dated March 30, 2016. 12. Submission of Final Stage Planned Unit Development application and documents to meet applicable zoning ordinance requirements, for subsequent City Council consideration. ADOPTED this 25th day of April, 2016, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL i ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 639 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE LANDMARK II PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM CCD, CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT, F -1 SUBDISTRICT TO LANDMARK II PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: LOTS 1 -3, BLOCK 36, MONTICELLO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2.4(P) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: (XX) Landmark II PUD District (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Landmark II PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for multiple family residential land uses. (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Landmark II PUD District shall be multiple family residential, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , 2016, as may be amended. (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to multiple family residential uses, and as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Landmark II PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the CCD, Central Community District shall apply. (e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 2.4 (P)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new ORDINANCE NO. 639 project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amendment to rezoned the following described parcels from CCD, Central Community District, F -1 Sub - District to Landmark II PUD, Planned Unit Development District: Lots 1 -3, Block 36, Monticello (Original Plat) Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2016. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Brian Stumpf, Mayor 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -006 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REZONING TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD) AND A PUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE SIGN PLAN APPROVAL RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT OF A 23 UNIT MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE WHEREAS, Masters Fifth Avenue has submitted an application for approval of the rezoning of a parcel of land from CCD District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District; and WHEREAS, in addition to the request for rezoning approval, the applicant has also requested approval of a Development Stage PUD site plan approve for a 23 unit, multi- family housing development; and WHEREAS, the proposed 23 unit multi - family apartment community with conditions meets applicable performance standards of the City's Zoning Ordinance and specifically those applicable provisions of the City's downtown development goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 5, 2016 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello made the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed project complies with the intent of the use of Planned Unit Development in that the flexibility offered under PUD is utilized to further the objectives for the area within the City Comprehensive Plan. 2. With conditions, Development Stage PUD plans meet all applicable requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 3. Except as otherwise allowed per PUD flexibility, all applicable requirements performance standards of the City's Zoning Ordinance will be satisfied. 4. The addition of residential units to the downtown is consistent with the City's redevelopment objectives. 5. The residential project on the subject site contributes to a reasonable transition of land uses between the commercial core and residential neighborhoods to the west. 6. Building design, including common areas on the ground floor, complies with the general intent to limit ground floor residential uses in the area. 7. Building materials, including extensive glass and masonry, is consistent with the requirements of the zoning ordinance and downtown development objectives. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -006 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the matter at its regular meeting on April 5th, 2016 and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the proposed rezoning and Development Stage PUD site plan is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions as outlined in Exhibit Z of the staff report of April 5th, 2016. ADOPTED this 5th day of April, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION IRA ATTEST: Brad Fyle, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 Lots 1 -3, Block 36, Original Plat Monticello, 155 - 010 - 036030 Created by: City of Monticello v �► ,� 75,E Al AO CO O A • y v. + C, Rp *A A CO tgr 1 d 6 �� i a Landmark II PUD Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc., and BG &J Properties, LLC, (the subsequent owner /developer) is applying for a change of use for the property at 213 3RD ST W. This will change the zoning from CCD District to a Planned Unit Development in the CCD District to accommodate plans for Landmark Square II, which will be developed as the West 3rd Building, a 23 unit apartment building that will lease to residents who are in the 55 year old and older category Background for the West 3rd Building Development: According to the stated policy of Monticello, a mix of uses in the Downtown is desirable. Currently there is big box retail, small space retail, office, single family housing, multi - family housing, and commercial entities. These functions all work together to support a healthy interactive economic system. The West 3rd Building Development is a 23 unit apartment three story building with 16 garages and adequate parking that is designed for 55 year old and older residents. These are residents who want to live within walking distance of shopping, restaurants, parks, employment, and community activities. Adding this group of people to the Downtown increases the diversity of our city, adds to the number of civic contributors, and provides instant consumers for downtown businesses. This project will be built on the edge of the CCD District, an ideal transition from single family homes to the West to the commercial /business to the East. The West 3rd Building Development contributes to an atmosphere that encourages people to move, work and stay in Monticello. Action by the City to support this project will send a clear signal that the market in Downtown Monticello is thriving and that it is a great place to live, work, and play. This project will comply with the conditions established by the city comprehensive plan. It is anticipated that it will increase property values, add to the safety of the area, create positive traffic, encourage other development, and be an aesthetically pleasing addition to this area. The main reason for the Planned Unit Development is to increase density in the project. All other codes and conditions are planned to remain the same. Having a larger number of consumers will increase the viability of the downtown area, an area that needs more traffic, not less. Included in the project is street parking along 3rd street which provides parking in addition to the already adequate site parking. This parking will be constructed to coordinate with similar areas in the downtown. Street lighting will coordinate with the theme designed by the city for the downtown. Garages have been placed to allow visibility to other businesses in the area and the exteriors of the garages will coordinate with the design standards established by the city. This project is a great use for this site. A mix of residential, business and retail in existing downtowns has been shown to be a concept that works well to provide a healthy economy. In general, redevelopment in Downtown Monticello has been tough, as it has in surrounding cities. The last building constructed in downtown in last 14 years was Walgreens- -that by a company that will acquire a site based on location alone, so price was not the primary consideration. Before that, Landmark Square I was built in 2002, Locust Commons strip center in 2000, and Monticello Mall /CUB Foods in 1998, all by Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc. Before that, the Ben Fran klin /Walgreens /Schlenner Wenner building was constructed in 1987. While several projects have been proposed on this site over the last eleven years, none has been able to be built, mainly because of economic reasons. This may be the last best chance for development on this site for the foreseeable future. After approval, Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc., and BG &J Properties, LLC, (the subsequent owner /developer) understands and is prepared to fund the project, the PUD process, the city specifications for street and utility improvements as agreed upon, and the guarantees therein involved. At this time, a previous survey has been submitted with an updated survey in process. Lighting location, style, mounting and light distribution have yet to be determined by the architect and will be available during the final PUD application process. There are no park areas proposed, but plans call for additional sidewalks on the property. L° CONC. SLAB W / #4'' 24'OC EACH WAY ON L' GRAN. FILL. LOCK S) 3/LI ►1. -A1"X t�,_ #ytaM�Ty��>► A►�AAAA� l TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE 1/4' - 1'-0' ROCK PACE PRE -CAST 3'-O' HEAVY DUTY BLOCK CONCRETE SLIDE SOLT W /LOCKING TO MATCH CAP SYSTEM AND PLATE APT. BLDG. HANGER. SEE Z DETAIL L /LI S' STEEL PIPE BOLLARD PAINT TO MATCH MAIN SLOG. STAINED CEDAR GATE PAINT TO MATCH MAIN BUILDING L--------- - - - - -- — P CONCRETE CURB 2 FRONT ELEVATION SCALE 1/4° 1-0' PRE -CAST CONCRCAP 8 CRS. e' COLORED CONCRETE ROCK PACE BLOCK TO MATCH BUILDING. V HIGH x S' WIDE CONCRETE CURB TO SET WALLS ON. L° CONC. SLAB W / #4's • 24'O.C. EACH WAY AND 1'-O' THICKENED EDGES ON L' GRAN. PILL - f TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION SCALE: 1/2° - I' -O° N U 0 U TREE PLAN' AREA TREE PLAN' AREA S' DIA. STEEL PIPE BOLLARD STAINED CEDAR GATE COLOR TO MATCH MAIN SLOG. S' COLORED CONCRETE BLOCK TO MATCH BUILDING CONTINUOUS HEAVY DUTY HINGE WELDED TO POLLARD AND DOOR PRAMS JAMB t'l GATE DOOR SCALE 11/2' - I' -O' TRASH 9NCLOBOW GAT9 DOOR SLIDE BOLT LOCKING SYSTEM V T.& i� C.L. THIRD STREET WEST LOT SIZE - 33.150 Sr 10.1L AC) IMPERVIOUS AREA = 2'1.524 Sr (83 %) CURRENT ZONING = CCD APARTMENT BUILDING 8,415 SP /FLOOR (3 FLOORS) GARAGE A 2,041 Sr GARAGE B = 1,943 SF PARKING STALLS PROVIDED = M GARAGES PROVIDED IL TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED - 35 ADDITIONAL STREET PARKING PROVIDED = 8 PARKING STALL SIZE - 'I'— O'x2O' —O' S PLAN SCALAL E: I /1L' P —O- 1E STREET LIGHTING LOCUST t THIRD STREET I'CH THE LIGHTING .NUT STREET 3TE WALK AND ARD PAVERS TINUE EAST TO THE :CTION OP 3RD ND WALNUT ST, S. WALK AND PAVERS NUT STREET. i m i i S' STEEL PIPE BOLLARD PAINT TO MATCH MAIN SLOG. STAINED CEDAR GATE PAINT TO MATCH MAIN BUILDING L--------- - - - - -- — P CONCRETE CURB 2 FRONT ELEVATION SCALE 1/4° 1-0' PRE -CAST CONCRCAP 8 CRS. e' COLORED CONCRETE ROCK PACE BLOCK TO MATCH BUILDING. V HIGH x S' WIDE CONCRETE CURB TO SET WALLS ON. L° CONC. SLAB W / #4's • 24'O.C. EACH WAY AND 1'-O' THICKENED EDGES ON L' GRAN. PILL - f TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION SCALE: 1/2° - I' -O° N U 0 U TREE PLAN' AREA TREE PLAN' AREA S' DIA. STEEL PIPE BOLLARD STAINED CEDAR GATE COLOR TO MATCH MAIN SLOG. S' COLORED CONCRETE BLOCK TO MATCH BUILDING CONTINUOUS HEAVY DUTY HINGE WELDED TO POLLARD AND DOOR PRAMS JAMB t'l GATE DOOR SCALE 11/2' - I' -O' TRASH 9NCLOBOW GAT9 DOOR SLIDE BOLT LOCKING SYSTEM V T.& i� C.L. THIRD STREET WEST LOT SIZE - 33.150 Sr 10.1L AC) IMPERVIOUS AREA = 2'1.524 Sr (83 %) CURRENT ZONING = CCD APARTMENT BUILDING 8,415 SP /FLOOR (3 FLOORS) GARAGE A 2,041 Sr GARAGE B = 1,943 SF PARKING STALLS PROVIDED = M GARAGES PROVIDED IL TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED - 35 ADDITIONAL STREET PARKING PROVIDED = 8 PARKING STALL SIZE - 'I'— O'x2O' —O' S PLAN SCALAL E: I /1L' P —O- 1E STREET LIGHTING LOCUST t THIRD STREET I'CH THE LIGHTING .NUT STREET 3TE WALK AND ARD PAVERS TINUE EAST TO THE :CTION OP 3RD ND WALNUT ST, S. WALK AND PAVERS NUT STREET. i m a .V o a h� aRt!a i I I I I I r, I W4 va I I � I I I I I I ko I dik 101._n° PLAN 1 HPD II °BATHI TH � a n ' t. Im (T) { * ` IrT T1 LR L ! QO 4,,. y OQ UK a DECK IC_ °, 26r_3. ~a MECH. ROOM ; Q [I I UMT am I BATH ° 20 n -m '21 2 MATH ' �o - - / — 2' -9° f\ o rll / �J4K7� I 2N® �!;TM r � A - _ - � i i I •' m� � - - OPEN ilo _L i TH i - ,7 , OE ° —O Q UNIT °P° 2 BED 2 BATH L20 UNIT °CJ° 2 BED 2 B- F2-M 2L -3° d v II 7' O° �, '_'= 'IG'�O° �, 18' -L° CK F�. -B° 13,-8` 9' -8° PLAN t II2' -O° T C)SICHIRD PL?OR PL 4N DECK sv —o' 2I' —O° ` 17 19' —O° 4eLO° UNIT °B' I BED 1 1 IATH UNIT 1 BED I I IATH CT Tq� QO J Lj OQ 0 I�+ i MECH. ROOM k� Q V DU [i UNIT °A I BED I BATH a n UNIT °E° m 2 BED 2 BATH t m ® n (r 2 9° 21". f t. UNIT 2 BEDi➢JkTH Evil r _ i UNIT 'C 2 BE; BATH 1O - O "I .. I t ' { DO `Y n ft" . ... '... °P° ` 4� UNIT 2 BED 2 BATH ® n "!LATH 2L' -C4i -8° -1' -O° JCL' O' K II2' -O° T C)SICHIRD PL?OR PL 4N - TREATED CANT RUN RUBBER MEMBRANE PROVIDE RIGID INSULATION UP PARAPET UNDER NDER `� AS REQ'D. TO SHED WATER METAL CAP A D D. TO GUTTER SYSTEM METAL CAP -ROCK BALLAST �� CV RUBBER MEMBRANE I/Y PIBER BOARD Y X [° WD. STUDS' +�' - �6 /S' T[G ROOF SHEATH IN ate- 1f I TREATED CANT PROVIDE RIGID INSULATION AS REQ'D. TO SHED WATER- S TOP CHORD OR TO GUTTER SYSTEM -NO. WOOD ROOP ISMS • 29° O.C. 8 SPACE TO BE PILLED ROCK BALLAST ISULA AVG.. 6 18' GYP. SHEATHING. -- r 1 e, 574R ANN "LxM LAP .9 MU.. VAPOR BARRIER A R 3 /oU NPW •C° GYPSUM BOARD { UNIT � OTF COMPLETELY SPRIN PER NPPA I" 24 5/ $TUDS • 16 O.C. Y_ ORRI 6/8' TYPE°' GYPSUM BOARD VY RC- CHANNEL CHANNEL 3 I/2' SOUND INSULATION - VOW IL p 2 LAYERS 6/8' TYPE°X' GYP. BD: .. m/OJOIBT HANGSRS•C• - - - - - ! LITY CHASE _.OUND INSULATION - - UNIT - NDED CEILING 8=8 • 1[° O.C. '..� lAYMR8 ' TYPE°' GYPSUM BOARD RRIDOR RC- CHANNEL CHANNEL �... /Y SOUND INSULA'T'ION - I� _ IgTg N N•ROp, li 6/8' TYPE'X' GYP. BD.� I'i T HA GB 8 2W WOOD STUDS IL° O.C. R -21 INSULATION 6 /8° GYP. BD. W/ .9 MU.. VAPOR BARRIER ANC14909OLT AS REQ'D. I/Y R -10 N CRS. L' C.M.U. J ' IF POURED N , SLAB ID CRS. 12' BOND BEAM SEE STRUCT. (3) CRS. 12, CONC. BLOCK JO MIL. VAPOR BARRIER L' NULAR PILL R -16 MN. NSUL � CO- gp�, gT PLC -e ACT G - L�•�`.- •FOR FOi�TINCs8'LANS j 13UI1 -DING *SON SCALE: I/2' = I' -O° STRUCT FLANS VAPOR BARRIER PEE 'C° GYPSUM BOARD RUN RUBBER MEMBRANE x t 6/8' GYP. SHEATHING' METAL CAP AS REQ'D. -U) CRS. 12' BOND SEAM #1TAL CAP STONE CAP ROCK PACED jj 2' X V WD. STUDS 1k i- WO` GYP. SHEATHING BLOCK VENEER k V2° ISOLATION JOINT W/ - 'R -16 MIN. INSUL. RIGID pD INSUI FOR FOOTINGS LANE ON Y AIR SPACE O° PROVIDE PLASHING t WEEP HOLES AS — REQ'D. 7 €GROUT PILL AS REQ'D. 2W WOOD STUDS IL° O.C. R -21 INSULATION 6 /8° GYP. BD. W/ .9 MU.. VAPOR BARRIER ANC14909OLT AS REQ'D. I/Y R -10 N CRS. L' C.M.U. J ' IF POURED N , SLAB ID CRS. 12' BOND BEAM SEE STRUCT. (3) CRS. 12, CONC. BLOCK JO MIL. VAPOR BARRIER L' NULAR PILL R -16 MN. NSUL � CO- gp�, gT PLC -e ACT G - L�•�`.- •FOR FOi�TINCs8'LANS j 13UI1 -DING *SON SCALE: I/2' = I' -O° STRUCT FLANS VAPOR BARRIER PEE 'C° GYPSUM BOARD RUN RUBBER MEMBRANE x -P PARAPET AND UNDER UNIT METAL CAP AS REQ'D. -U) CRS. 12' BOND SEAM #1TAL CAP t jj 2' X V WD. STUDS .. i- WO` GYP. SHEATHING low iANl7 o iii' G19ti1 BOARD- 4 Ba V✓IPOR, MARM9 q }{pR qg y} r 2 LCTREATfffkf-Tf ri E7J. SEh.6R' 3/9' GYP -CRETE UNDERLAYME -3/9' OSB SUBPLOOR -PROVIDE PLASHNG. AS REQUIr WOOD PLOOR TRUSSES - SEE T.OT.O. SH R -2I BATT INSULATION N RN JON TOP PLATE BUILDING WRAP TYPICAL THRU- 6/8° GYPSUM SHEATHING 2xt PRE -CUT STUDS • I[' O.C. R -2I BATT INSULATION PACE BRICK STONE CAP �- RVR &IZ %0RCK PACED 'T. O I ` GROUT PILL AS x EJPb. UNIT -U) CRS. 12' BOND SEAM L° RANUI.AR Pll.l. T.O. SHEATHINGJI COACTED BASE V2° ISOLATION JOINT W/ - 'R -16 MIN. INSUL. RIGID pD INSUI FOR FOOTINGS LANE ON M. low iANl7 o iii' G19ti1 BOARD- 4 Ba V✓IPOR, MARM9 q }{pR qg y} r 2 LCTREATfffkf-Tf ri E7J. SEh.6R' 3/9' GYP -CRETE UNDERLAYME -3/9' OSB SUBPLOOR -PROVIDE PLASHNG. AS REQUIr WOOD PLOOR TRUSSES - SEE T.OT.O. SH R -2I BATT INSULATION N RN JON TOP PLATE BUILDING WRAP TYPICAL THRU- 6/8° GYPSUM SHEATHING 2xt PRE -CUT STUDS • I[' O.C. R -2I BATT INSULATION PACE BRICK STONE CAP �- RVR &IZ %0RCK PACED 'T. O I ` GROUT PILL AS I F_ v I r I I 41 lui 1 2 .4 kl I -• I I ���_II IIl I II l 11 uiii I I o 0 C]i • i • • ELEV. TOO' 10 MIL. VAPOR BA -U) CRS. 12' BOND SEAM L° RANUI.AR Pll.l. (3) CRS. D° CONC. BLOCK COACTED BASE V2° ISOLATION JOINT W/ - 'R -16 MIN. INSUL. RIGID pD INSUI FOR FOOTINGS LANE ON .. ' t 961-a" ' ' `' -: L -8 O° I F_ v I r I I 41 lui 1 2 .4 kl I -• I I ���_II IIl I II l 11 uiii I I o 0 C]i • i • • "I 7Aw EST 3RD BUIL MONTICELLO, MN COLE GROO A R C H IT E C T S ■ ■ ff 276 Para a ue S,. Suite 102 - SA MN P m ti- N r r R Tor ir E f 1 116 I� M1 1 I 0 11' - - a r- - O'er 10- ,e - r F, i 0 r, a e . F A 1 1� lei I r� 1 AL- r r . ' N r r R Tor ir E f 1 116 I� M1 1 I 0 11' - - a r- - O'er 10- ,e - r F, i 0 r, a e . F A 1 1� lei I BRICK ASPHALT SHINGLES- BRICK COLUMN STONE BRICK SOLDIER L BRICK VENEER T/0- PARAPET AL 6" HORZ. LAP SIC VERTICAL SID 6 11 \- DOWNSPOUT NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" t-- L. t-- V. I C) u - - C) \-Pv SCALE: 1/8" = I'-C" If GIB 1 1 \ — f-It I- Id I L11 I IV .-; �) k_/ LA 11—f L— " L— Y /-� I I '-/ I X SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" CAL SIDING )RZ. LAP SIDING :'ROVIDE MAX. 3'-O"w x S'-O"h 5IGNAGEAREA )N BUILDING 4SONRY BAND =-V. 1101-10 5/8111 r ,SFHALT SHINGLES ABRIC AWNING RICK COLUMN :OMMERCIAL TOREFRONT )VERSIZED STONE ,LOCK VENEER F.F.E. - FIRSTAIf-� ELEV. 100'-0 TEL :2 0 C) LLJ 't 0 O Li 0 mmwa iiammmmmm momemmomm mommommomm ■■mmmomm■■ mommo■■■■■ HORZ. LAP SIDING VERTICAL SIDING OVERSIZED STONEN _BLOCK VENEER F.F.E. - FIRSTil MMEMEMM ON IS �Imi' E 0 . . . . . . . . . . LIN NJ E ------- 6" HORZ. LAP SIC VERTICAL SID 6 11 \- DOWNSPOUT NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" t-- L. t-- V. I C) u - - C) \-Pv SCALE: 1/8" = I'-C" If GIB 1 1 \ — f-It I- Id I L11 I IV .-; �) k_/ LA 11—f L— " L— Y /-� I I '-/ I X SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" CAL SIDING )RZ. LAP SIDING :'ROVIDE MAX. 3'-O"w x S'-O"h 5IGNAGEAREA )N BUILDING 4SONRY BAND =-V. 1101-10 5/8111 r ,SFHALT SHINGLES ABRIC AWNING RICK COLUMN :OMMERCIAL TOREFRONT )VERSIZED STONE ,LOCK VENEER F.F.E. - FIRSTAIf-� ELEV. 100'-0 TEL :2 0 C) LLJ 't 0 O Li 0 mmwa iiammmmmm momemmomm mommommomm ■■mmmomm■■ mommo■■■■■ ASPHALT SHINGLES L' CORNER �{TRRIIM� pp����pp % LAP 91DINGL TO MATCH APARTMENT END ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8' - I' -O' 2x4 STUDS • 14" O.C. S/8" TYPE 'X' GYPSUM BOARD >W ALL TYi'E EATING -1 HOUR APPLIES SCALE: 314' =P -O' S.T.C. -30 TO 34 1 VOID DESIGN -U 305 TEST -UL RI319 -4 I NO. -WP 3405 '1 /16' OXBOARD SHEATHNO 154 PELT ASPHALT SHINGLES TO MATCH APARTMENT — 2 PRE -ENG. ROOP WOOD TRUSSES �5 24' O.C. m/ STANDARD HEEL OVERHEAD DOOR HEADER (2) 2,d2'. 2x4 STUDS I4' O.C. I /2° SHEATHING I/2' PLYWOOD SHEATHING • END WALLS TREATED SILL PLATE m/ SILL SBALES - 5 /8' ANCHOR BOLTS • 48' O.C. —\ BITUMINOUS PAVING OR CONCRETE APRON 4° CONCRETE SLAB m/ A.A 10 /10 WAI.P. ON CRUSHED STONE PILL ON COMPACTED BASE — POURED CONCRETE FOOTING m/ (2) u6 BARS CONTINUOUS l LUALL SECTION 1/2' - 1-0° NOTE: EXTERIOR FINISH TO MATCH APARTMENT BUILDING. !REFER TO ARCH. DWGSa TRIM LAP 91DNG TRIM TO MATCH APARTMENT REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8' - I i i FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8° - P -O' * I n n C) PI d Al SCALE: 1/8' - 1' -0' I i I I I I I l I iv I a i i I i I I i SCALE: 1/8' - I' -O' 4 n n ,LES k T. s �vr ecx bWG 9 IAN I I aALL -------------------------------------------------------------- YCxI'C HA rrmr oxo. Yo'xl'C OHA rrmr o Yp`xro` OHA rrmr oxo. � Olt 9 oxo. tr ' ----- I -- -------- ---------- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- � - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - -- II' -O° 111-0. II' -O° V -84 * I n n C) PI d Al SCALE: 1/8' - 1' -0' I i I I I I I l I iv I a i i I i I I i SCALE: 1/8' - I' -O' 4 n n ,LES k T. s LANDSCAPE. PLAN NUMBER NOTES � E 2. TOPSOIL SPRCLOT" YERMTHE AND EDGING LAWN ARREEAS QUIRBD)THIb AREA SHOWN HATCHED. 3. EDGING TO BE 48° OUT FROM BUILDING, AND OTHER MARKED AREAS. 4. GENERAL NOTE: A) - B) ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. EQUIPMENT TO HAVE BACK FLOW PREVENTION DEVICE AND RAIN SENSOR DEVICE. VERIFY W/ G.C. C) ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS WITHOUT ROCK / CEDAR MULCH TO HAVE SOD OR SEED. VERIFY W/ G.C. D) IS AT FaSHED GRADE L MATERIALS SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE ROOT FLAIR E) - PLANTING SCHEDULE ItAaXO .was - IU OR13 AaOPCAIOrrI R13 mn SITE - 0.1 AC M - It AC OF CANOPY TREES MrIMMG AT LEAST 3 MtWnM PER ACRE ruNi z � m COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME HT. U K REMARKS 3 A O SPRING SNOW MMIAPPLE Mob'*q Std 638 SF I VY B t 6 STRAIGHT LEADER AND FULL CROWN 2 B • SIUDFMF IM Hm LOCLV Glo tw emaed . shode Mond I VT B t B A D FULL LEAD "C" (2 BED. "C" 3 926 SF 2 BATH) 11C.1" (2 BED, 5 DECIDUOUS 1,044 SF TREES PROVIDED • L5 ACI EACH - T5 Aa TOTAL "D" (2 BED, 3 3 C J' ' CpLORApO SPRUCE Ps W-- B t B STRAIGHT LEADER 1.060 SF 3 CONIFEROUS 2 BATH) TREES PROVIDED • 2 Aa EACH - t AU TOTAL "F" (2 BED, 2 1x24 SF 2 BATH) 21 D 0 ID Moumm > b-W. 'Gdd Maori' 24° 100% S GAL. CONTAINER 15 E O N)IEmm SUMMER WSSi PFpeompw galCom 24' S GAL. CONTAINER ee g L F MS9 KSt LA.AC gmo WA&'Mm Kd 24' - 5 GAL. CONTAINER 42 TOTAL DECIDUOUS SHRUBS PROVIDED ii$5F (L'124 LINEAR FEET / 10 X 4) / 2 G ' BLUE STAR am JaoW arymete Sloe SW 24' - S GAL. CONTAINER 1121 15 H 10 GLOBE ARBORVMAE TiV —&dl)o d&m 24• - 5 GAL. CONTAINER -121 TOTAL EVERGREEN SHRUBS PROVIDED 041 SHRUBS REQUIRED PER BUILDING PERIMETER -420 LF /10 FT- 424-0.1 TOTAL (50.Y. EVERGREEN) 18 D LD MOUND SFam *m bmm 'Grid Maori 24' - S GAL. CONTAINER 8 F ® nw o ULAC gentle W46 T. Kd 24' - S GAL. CONTAINER 26 TOTAL DECIDUOUS SHRUM PROVIDED 10 H G408E ARBORVITAE TO —d-6 /alien 24° - S GAL. CONTAINER P 10 TOTAL EVERGREEN SHRUBS PROVIDED 3L ADDITIONAL SHRUBS PROVIDED (BEYOND ZONING REQUIREMENTS) BUILDING UNIT MIX UNIT TYPE. TOTAL S.F. % 13Y TYPE "A" (1 BED, 3 638/648 SF 1 BATH) LANDSCAPE MULCH "AY' (1 BED. 1 638 SF 43% ® 1 BATH) "B" (1 BED. 6 - 742 sr BATH} "C" (2 BED. "C" 3 926 SF 2 BATH) 11C.1" (2 BED, 2 1,044 SF 2 BATH) "D" (2 BED, 3 896 SF 51% 2 BATH) "E" (2 BED, g 1.060 SF 2 BATH) "F" (2 BED, 2 1x24 SF 2 BATH) TOTAL- 23 100% A m Q m cv 1— in U_I 1X 1- U7 1- N U O -I U rr��� C.L. THIRD STRnE.T WE=ST KEY LANDSCAPE FLAN SCALE: I/lt' - Y -Oe M s PouRED CONCRETE CONCRETE PAVERS VERIFY STYLE AND PATTERx LANDSCAPE MULCH LAWN GRASS LANDSCAPE FLAN SCALE: I/lt' - Y -Oe M s STANDARDS AND REFERENCES Materials and construction methods specified in the plans reference the Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction. The Contractor shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and review the specification sections applicable to the plans. It is mandatory that the Contractor be knowledgable of the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with the applicable specification sections. Contractor shall refer to the geotechnical report for additional requirements and recommendations. EARTHWORK NOTES PROTECTION 1) The Contractor shall maintain all benchmarks, monuments and other reference points. If any are disturbed or destroyed, they shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. 2). The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any unknown functioning underground utilities are discovered during the course of the project, which may interfere with construction. The Contractor shall wait for instructions before proceeding. 3) The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to functioning underground or overhead utility lines. Damaged utilities shall be repaired immediately and service restored at no additional cost to the Owner. 4) The Contractor shall provide barricades, shoring and other safety measures required by OSHA. 5) The Contractor shall protect all adjacent existing facilities from damage, including, but not limited to settlement due to excavations, erosion, etc. The Contractor shall be responsible for the repair of such damages. PROJECT CONDITIONS 1) The Contractor shall become familiar with the project site, and compare actual conditions in the field with those shown on the project drawings. The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any inconsistencies are found between the existing conditions and the project drawings. 2) No extra compensation will be allowed due to unusual conditions which could have reasonably been determined or anticipated by examination of the project site and project drawings. PLAN GRADES 1) Elevations shown on the project drawings are finished grade elevations, unless noted otherwise. Elevations not specifically indicated shall be determined by interpolation of uniform slope between spot elevations and /or contours, or between such points and existing elevations. Adequate slope shall be constructed to provide positive drainage away from structures. 2) If inconsistencies exist on the plans between contours and spot elevations, the spot elevations shall govern. TOPSOIL 1) Adequate imported and /or stockpiled salvageable topsoil shall be utilized for this project. 2) Topsoil shall be free of clay lumps, roots, brush, large stones, and debris, and shall have a minimum organic content of 5 percent. 3) Remove topsoil to its entire depth from areas, which are to be disturbed by new construction work. Existing lawn areas, which are not in the proposed construction area (s) shall remain in place. The Contractor shall field verify topsoil depths between any soil borings, and remove to greater depths than indicated in the soils report if such conditions are encountered. Salvaged topsoil shall be maintained in stockpiles. 4) Stockpiled topsoil shall only be used for finish grading of new lawn areas. Excess topsoil shall be removed from the site by the Contractor. 5) Protect all existing lawn areas, plantings, and other landscaping to remain in place. Any damaged areas shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. UNFORESEEN OBSTACLES 1) The Engineer shall be contacted immediately if any unforeseen major obstacles are encountered during excavation, such as abandoned wells, abandoned or functioning utilities, subsurface streams or rock, etc., which would add significant expense to the Contractor. 2) The Contractor shall still be responsible for completing all work required for this project where encountered conditions may be reasonably determined from a soils /geotechnical report and review of the project site and contract documents. DEWATERING 1) Surface drainage shall be provided during construction in a manner so as not to create a nuisance to adjacent areas. 2) All excavations shall be free of water during construction within the excavations. Dewatering shall be accomplished by pumping or trenching, and shall be conducted regardless of the cause, source, or nature of the water. 3) Berms, cofferdams, or piling shall be provided as necessary to protect excavations. 4) Excavations shall be sloped to drain, and necessary pumps, hoses and other equipment shall be provided to keep excavation free of water. 5) All temporary equipment used for dewatering shall be removed from the site when no longer necessary. FILLING AND GRADING 1) Rough grading of all areas within the construction limits, including adjacent transition areas shall be reasonably smooth and compacted. The rough graded subgrade surface generally shall not be more than 6 inches above or below the established subgrade elevations. All ditches, swales, and gutters shall be graded to drain adequately. The subgrade shall be evenly sloped to provide drainage away from building walls in all directions at a minimum slope of 1 %. The Contractor shall provide rounded transitions at top and bottom of banks and other breaks in grade. 2) Fill and backfill materials shall be inorganic soils free of roots, rocks, boulders, and debris. 3) Bedding material or granular backfill larger than 2" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 2 feet of new underground pipes. Material larger than 3" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 1 foot of subgrade elevation. 4) Imported compacted fill material shall have a maximum of 12 percent passing the #200 sieve, by weight. The proposed fill material shall be tested by an independent testing lab for suitability as compacted fill for this project. The Contractor shall pay for the testing services and provide a copy of the test results to the Engineer. 5) The Contractor shall fill and grade as necessary to bring surface to required elevations, and provide all materials necessary, whether obtained on or off the project site. 6) The Contractor shall place compacted material in uniform horizontal lifts not exceeding 8" in depth for clay soils, and 12" in depth for sandy soils, and compact as required to achieve specified density. 7) Compaction shall be obtained with the use of vibratory rollers or rammers. During compaction, fill material shall contain moisture content, as necessary, for the required compaction as indicated by an independent testing laboratory. The moisture shall be uniform throughout each lift. If the material is too dry, water shall be added with approved equipment and methods, which will not wash out fine material. If the material is too wet, it shall be dried by harrowing, disking, blading, or other approved methods recommended by the independent testing laboratory. 8) Areas designated for pavement in excavated (cut) areas shall be scarified to a depth of 1 foot. The Contractor shall bring the subgrade material to optimum moisture content as indicated by the independent testing laboratory, and compact the subgrade to the specified density listed below for soils underneath pavements. 9) The Contractor shall not place fill material when either the fill material, or the material on which it is to be placed, is frozen. Any soft or yielding areas appearing in the fill resulting from frost, rain, or any other reason whatsoever shall be scarified, removed, recompacted and /or otherwise rectified to the satisfaction of the Engineer before any new fill is placed. COMPACTION TESTS 1) Utility Trench Backfill: The Contractor's independent soils technician and approved testing laboratory shall perform in -place density and moisture tests at random depths in trench backfill at 100 foot intervals, or fraction thereof. Compaction of trenches shall be a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density (as determined by the independent testing laboratory) in lawn areas, and at depths greater than 3 feet below areas designated for pavement. Compaction of trenches at depths within 3 feet of paved surfaces shall be a minimum of 100% of the maximum dry density. 2) Compacted Fill Under Pavements: Compaction tests shall not be required beneath new pavements. Adequate compaction of materials under pavements shall be determined by test rolling the subgrade, and checking for excessive rutting. Test rolling shall be performed as per MNDOT Spec. 2111. 3) Areas exhibiting a failed compaction test shall be re- compacted and re -m tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to acceptance of the project. 4) Copies of all compaction testing and test roll observation reports shall be provided to the Engineer. 5) Optimum moisture - density relationship will be determined by testing laboratory in accordance with ASTM D698 and maximum density determination made by Method D of ASTM D698 unless otherwise noted in these specifications. SUBGRADE PREPARATION 1) Finished subgrade elevations shall be as follows: a) Bituminous pavement (parking lot): 9" below finish grade. b) Bituminous pavement (public right -of -way): q' below finish grade. b) Concrete pavement /apron: 13" below finish grade. c) Concrete sidewalk: 4" below finish grade (plus thickened edge). d) Lawn areas: 4" below finish grade. e) Planting areas: See Landscaping Plans /Details 2) The tolerance for areas to be paved shall not exceed 0.15 feet above or below plan subgrade. 3) The Contractor shall protect newly graded areas from erosion. Settlement or washing that occurs prior to acceptance of the Work shall be repaired and grades re- established. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS WASTE MATERIALS 1) The Contractor shall remove excess excavated mate(al, debris, and waste materials, from the Owner's property and legally dispose of it in accordance with all governing codes. SPREADING TOPSOIL AND FINISH GRADING 1) Scarify subgrade to depth of 3" prior to placing topsoil. Spread topsoil evenly over complete subgrade as follows: a) Lawn Areas on Private Property: Spread 4" lightly compacted layer of topsoil. b) Lawn Areas in Public Right -of -way: Per City requirements c) Planting Areas: See Landscape Plan /Details 2) Finish grade accurately within 0. 15 feet of finish grades shown on the project drawings, less the thickness of any sod where it is to be installed. Slope all grades away from buildings to provide positive drainage. 3) Prepare topsoil suitable to receive seed and /or sod. Grading of areas designated for topsoil shall be reasonably smooth and even and in accordance with MNDOT Spec. 2105.3G and 2574.3A4. All debris and stones exceeding g 3" in diameter shall be removed from the soil surface of these areas prior to seeding. Areas compacted by vehicles or storage of materials shall be plowed, disked and harrowed to match texture of other finish graded areas. 4) Grass seed shall be in accordance with MnDOT Spec. 3876, seed mix No. 25 -131, applied at the rate of 220 pounds per acre or as indicated on the landscape plans. Mulch shall be applied and discanchored to all seeded areas and shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Spec. 3882, Type 3 or as otherwise indicated by the Engineer. UTILITY NOTES STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1) The following standard specifications shall apply to this project: a) Minnesota Plumbing Code - MN Rules Chapter 4714 (MN Dept. of Labor and Industry- MNDLI) b) Uniform Plumbing Code, latest edition (UPC) c) "What you need to know about utility service connections in the 2015 Minnesota Plumbing Code" http:// www .dii.mn.gov /CCLD /PDF /pe_usc.pdf d) City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Standard Specifications e) American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) f) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) g) American Water Works Association (AWWA) h) Minnesota Department of Transportation "Standard Specifications for Construction" (MN /DOT) 2) The Contractor shall comply with all local ordinances and codes 3) Certifications of all utility materials, as well as shop drawings, shall be submitted to the Engineer for review POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - SANITARY 1) Smooth walled polyvinyl chloride pipe and fittings shall consist of SDR 26 or SDR 35 pipe, unless noted otherwise, and meet the requirements of ASTM D3034 and Section 2621.2A5 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) All pipe and fittings shall be SDR 35 for depths of up to 20 feet, and SDR 26 for depths exceeding 20' 3) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications. DUCTILE IRON (DIP) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Ductile iron pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2A1 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.5 of the UPC, and Section 261 1.313 of the CEAM Standard Specifications. Stainless steel fasteners shall be prohibited. 3) 6" pipe shall be Class 52. 8" and larger pipe shall be Class 50. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (C900 PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Polyvinyl chloride pressure pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.4 of the UPC, and Section 261 1.313 of the CEAM Standard Specifications. GATE VALVES - WATER 1) Gate valves shall meet the requirements of Sections 2611.2C and 2611.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HYDRANTS - WATER 1) Hydrants shall meet the requirements of Sections 261 1.213 and 2611.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Hydrants shall be Waterous WB67, or approved equal BLOCKING AND ANCHORING - WATER 1) Water main blocking and anchoring shall meet the requirements of Section 2611.3A4 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Provide thrust reaction blocking consisting of concrete with a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 2000 psi. 3) Place between undisturbed ground and the fitting to be anchored. Place thrust blocking so that the pipe and fitting joints are accessible for repair. 4) Mega -Lugs may be used in lieu of thrust block if allowed by local utility. WATER SERVICE PIPE AND CURB STOPS 1) Copper tubing for water services shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 26111.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) HDPE pressure pipe for water services shall meet the requirements of ASTM D2239, ASTM D2737, ASTM D3035, AWWA C901, CSA 13137.1, and Section 2611.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Curb stops for water services Section 2611.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) HDPE pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM F2306, and Section 2621.2A8 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Minimum wall thickness shall be 0.035 inches for 12 and 15 inch diameter pipe, and shall be 0.05 inches for 18 and 24 inch diameter pipe. 4) HDPE storm sewer crossing above and within 10 -ft of existing or proposed water main or services shall meet the following standards per the MN plumbing code: 4"- 10" Diameter: AASHTO M252 12" - 60" Diameter: ASTM F2306 Fittings: ASTM D3212 REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWER PIPE (RCP) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) RCP pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM C76, and Section 2621.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) The ASTM strength class of pipe shall be Class III unless otherwise shown on the Plans. 4) The pipe shall be drawn together by some approved method of jacking or winching. This pressure must be maintained until sufficient backfill is placed to keep the joint from opening. END SECTIONS - STORM 1) End sections shall be provided at all pipe inlets and outlets. 2) The end sections shall consist of material matching the material of the pipe, which it is being connected to. Materials and joints shall be as per the specifications described above for the applicable pipe material. 3) The last 3 joints of RCP shall be tied, and the end section shall the be provided with an approved trash guard. MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS - SANITARY AND STORM 1) Unless otherwise noted, manhole and catch basin structures shall consist of precast concrete, and meet the requirements of Section 719.6 of the UPC (sanitary only), and Sections 2621.2C and 2621.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Catch basins shall be provided with the following castings: a) Along curbline: Neenah R -3246 per City of Monticello standards b) Isolated (in paved area): Neenah R -2553 c) Isolated (in vegetated area): Neenah R- 2560 -EA w/ type "C" grate 3) Manholes shall be provided with the following castings: a) Sanitary: Neenah R-1 642-A per City of Monticello standards b) Storm: Neenah R-1 642-A per City of Monticello standards INSTALLATION 1) Unless otherwise noted, installation of all water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtenances shall be as per the CEAM Standard Specifications. TESTING REQUIREMENTS 1) Water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtances shall be inspected and tested as per Sections 2611.3E-2611.3H and 2621,3F- 2621.3H of the CEAM Standard Specifications. 2) In the event of discrepancies between the testing requirements of the MN Plumbing Code and the CEAM Standard Specifications, the most stringent will govern. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTES STANDARDS 1) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, most recent edition. GRANULAR BASE COURSE 1) Compacted thickness of finished base course: 6' 2) Process material for aggregate base shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3138, Class 5.. 3) The subgrade shall be tested and observed to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to placement of aggregate base material. Install base material as required to accommodate new plan grades. 4) Wet base material to approximate optimum moisture content either prior to delivery to job site or as soon as practical after being placed on subgrade. 5) Place in layers not exceeding 4" thickness (loose). 6) Compact with pneumatic or vibrating steel drum rollers. 7) After base course has been graded and compacted, thoroughly wet and slush roll with roller until all aggregates are thoroughly embedded. 8) Allow base course to cure for a minimum of 72 hours prior to bituminous course application. BITUMINOUS BASE AND SURFACE COURSE 1 Mix Designation Numbers for the bituminous mixtures on this project are per MNDOT Spec. 2360 g p J p p 2) Pavement smoothness requirements will be waived for this project. 3) Density for the bituminous mixture on this project will be the ordinary compaction method ( MNDOT 2360.6C). 4) Parking Lot: Bituminous Base course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPNWB330B and shall be 1i inches thick after compaction. Bituminous Surface course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPWEB340B and shall be 1i inches thick after compaction. 5) Public Right -of -way: Bituminous Base course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPNWB330B and shall be 2 inches thick after compaction. Bituminous Surface course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPWEB340B and shall be 1J inches thick after compaction. 5) Place no asphaltic mixture when the atmospheric temperature is below 45 degrees and falling, nor should pavement be placed under wet conditions. 6) Mixing a) Paving mixture: Uniform mixture of course aggregate, fine aggregate, mineral filler and asphaltic material. b) Grading and mixing: Conform to applicable sections of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, Section 2360. CONSTRUCTION METHODS 1 Properly clean base course and deliver hot mix asphaltic concrete in clean tight vehicles with covers if necessary. 2) Lay to a smooth surface without segregation of material and attain compaction as early as possible. Commence rolling while the material is hot, (minimum spread temperature 250 degrees F.) as soon as it will support the roller without undue displacement or hairline cracking and continue until a minimum of 96% of maximum has been attained, no further compression can be attained and all roller marks are eliminated. 3) The completed surface: Smooth, free of pockets that will retain water and shall not vary more than 1/16" per foot nor more than 1/4" under a 16' straight edge. Entire surface must drain. No flat areas are permitted. 4) Perform all Work in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. PAINTED LINES 1) Special marking paint compound especially for striping bituminous paving in one coat. 2) Manufacturers: Pratt & Lambert, Inc.; Sherwin Williams Co. or DuPont Co. 3) Colors: Use white paint for concrete and asphalt. 4 All surfaces to be painted must be thoroughly clean and dry. 5) Lay out painted lines with chalk on pavement in accordance with Project Drawings. 6) Accurately apply paint to the chalk marks, using striping machines, 4" wide stripes. 7) Apply paint in strict accordance with the manufacturer's directions. 8) Protect all paint from damage by traffic until dry. 9) Apply handicap logo at handicap stall. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL 1) Aggregate Base Testing: a) The granular base course shall be test rolled and observed by the Contractor's independent soils technician as per MNDOT 2211.3C2 (Quality Compaction Method). Once the base course has been tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer, pavement may be placed. b) One mechanical analysis (ASTM D -422) per 500 cubic yards of base or fraction thereof. 2) Bituminous Testing: a) Test temperature of first truck. b) Ordinary compaction ( MNDOT 2360.6C) CONCRETE PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS 1) ACI 318, ACI 315, CRSI, ACI 301, latest adoptions. 2) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Construction, most recent edition GRANULAR BASE COURSE MATERIAL 1) Compacted thickness of finished base: 6' - Concrete Pavement /Aprons 4" - Concrete Sidewalk 2) Base material shall consist of MNDOT 3149.262 Select Granular Borrow. AGGREGATES 1) Coarse: MnDOT Spec. 3137. 2) Fine: MnDOT Spec. 3126. WATER 1) Clean, fresh and potable, MnDOT Spec. 3906. AIR ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES 1) ASTM C260. 2) Provide entrainment of 4 - 7 percent by volume. PORTLAND CEMENT 1) ASTM C150, Type I plus an approved air entraining agent, or Type IA air - entraining Portland cement. OTHER ADMIXTURES 1) MnDOT Spec. 3113. 2) Calcium Chloride or materials containing chlorides or nitrates shall not be allowed. PROPORTIONING AND DESIGN OF MIXES 1) MnDOT Spec. 2461.3 2) Concrete Classifications a) Curb and gutter, slip- formed concrete: 3A22 b) Sidewalk, aprons, incidental concrete, manual curb & gutter: 3A32 c) Concrete pavements or aprons: 3Y43 d) Repair concrete, fast strength concrete: 3Y43 3) Concrete Specifications: a) 3A22: 1 -2" slump, 3900 psi, 4 -7% air b) 3A32: 2 -3" slump, 3900 psi, 4 -7% air c) 3Y43: 34' slump, 4300 psi, 4 -7% air d) Temperatures of all concrete during placement shall be 50 -deg F to 90 -deg F CONCRETE PLACEMENT 1) Place concrete as soon as possible after mixing. Place before initial set has occurred, and in no event after it has contained its water content for more than one hour. 2) Avoid overworking concrete or allowing concrete to fall unrestricted for excessive vertical distances, and other situations which can cause segregation of the aggregates. 3) Concrete pavements shall be placed in accordance with applicable portions of MnDOT 2301. 4) Sidewalks shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2521. 5) Curb and gutter shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2531. PROTECTION 1) Provide adequate protection against rain, sleet and snow before and during placement and finishing of concrete. 2) Protect concrete from premature drying. Provide temporary covering as required. Keep concrete continuously moist for 7 days. 3) Treat concrete with membrane curing compound in accordance with MnDOT 2531.3G. COLD WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is below 40 degrees F., or when the concrete is likely to be subjected to freezing temperatures within 24 hours after it has been deposited unless adequate temporary heating is provided. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from freezing for the following 5 days. 3) No frozen materials may be used in the concrete. Chemicals may not be used to prevent freezing unless approved by the Engineer. 4) Perform all cold weather concreting in accord with ACI 306. HOT WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is above 100 degrees F. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from temperatures over 90 degrees for the following 5 days. 3) Thoroughly wet dry porous surfaces before concreting. 4) Water reducing admixtures with retarding properties are required for all concrete placed when the temperature exceeds 80 degrees F. 5) Perform all hot weather concreting in accord with ACI 305. FINISHING 1) Provide a broomed finish on exterior sidewalks and ramps unless noted otherwise. QUALITY CONTROL 1) The Contractor shall hire an independent testing firm to provide the following tests: a) The independent testing technician shall perform random field testing of the fresh concrete including slump, air content and temperature. ASTM C143 C173 C231 and C138 . One series of the aforementioned tests shall be performed on the first load of concrete. b) The independent testing technician shall cast a set of four compression test cylinders for the first load of concrete as well as 1 set for every 100 cubic yards, or fraction thereof, of concrete thereafter. Compression tests shall be performed on one test cylinder at 7 days and two test cylinders at 28 days. The fourth test cylinder shall be retained in the event of failing compression tests on the 28 -day test cylinders. GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS O T O N O M O i W U) U W _ U J_ U Q Z_ J W O IY U) U O LL O Z IY z_ 2 J W ■■■ ■■■ MEN MEN ■ - ■■■■■■■■■■ ■iIN■■ ■■ ■A wI!_- ■R1■ lN�� EN�h'� ■■ ice`+■■ EMENMENNIN W.4 i�ifN■■ ' E��ia 035M WAR ■'Rd■ ■11111, ■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■.■ ■ ■■I 1■■ ■ EM■■■■■M■R . ' • • • , • ' ■■ ■■ ■I ■I ■■ ■I ' iiiifl ■ ■ ■� i ■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■` ®`JJ■■ ■■ ■ ■1111 ■f:Af`r.1 �■ ■&kh _9 ■ ►. WON In. No ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■1 1■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■©■■■■■■■ No H ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■r ■r��ii■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■Ir��■rirllI■�{�■ ■ ■■ ■iii ■V�!'iI■C�l■ ■ ■ ■ ■� ■ill ■�■ ■ITyi1 ■ ■iai ■� ■�■ ■M1201'ME■■■■ QME■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ USE NEENAH R- 1642 —A FOR LOW PROFILE APPLICATIONS USE NEENAH R1755 —G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS LETTERING TO READ: SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER OR WATER MAIN WHICH EVER IS APPLICABLE. "'« "' "H R -1642 WITH 3 SOLID LID JE BEARING OR 25 3/4 " BEAR IN SURFACE TO BE MACHINED COVER CONCEALED PICKHOLES (2) EAT OPPOSITE SI EXCEPT FOR LETTERI 7 24' 281/2 " 36" Standard Plate Library City of Monticello FRAME Standard Frame and Cover 03 -05 Plate No. 03 -15 1002 STREET BUILDING INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND LINE I TRACER WIRE SPLICE CURB BOX STANDPIPE I I COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE I 2' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKETI POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE I TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CITY CONTRACT CONTRACT I � I _ 1" COPPER WATERMAIN COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT SANITARY SERVICE MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Tracer Wire (New Developments) Date: 03 -08 Plate No. Revised :03 —15 3005 J TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN /DOT 2105) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN /DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT U GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN /DOT 3149.21' GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 BELOW FINISHED GRADE VARIES 10' TO 20' 1/8 BEND PVC Title: Typical Trench Compaction and Class B Bedding Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 1007 TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS FINISHED GRADE 6" PVC RISER FOR NON- RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) r WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG - HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Sanitary Clean -Out Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 03-151 3 0 0 6 TEE AND BEND BEND NOTES. 1. THRUST BLOCKING TO BE USED FOR BEND 22 1/2' AND OVER. 2. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL ONLY BE USED WHERE WORKING PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 150 PSI. 3 THRUST BLOCKS BEARING AREA TO BE POURED r WRAP PLUG WITH 4 MIL. POLY PLUG PLUG PIPE SIZE BEARING AREA 6" 4.0 SQ FT 8" 6.0 SQ FT 10" - 12" 12.0 SQ FT 16" 20.0 SQ FT AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. 4. POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE USED FOR 12" OR LARGER DIAMETER WATERMAIN 4. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10 FT. OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTAINED USING TIE RODS Standard Plate Library Cit y of Monticello Title: Blocking for Watermain ate: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 2002 2 0 0 2 0-15 Q CASTING ADJUSTING RINGS 1 � 4" MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME & COVER -\ \y Q STRUCTURE 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O1 REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. O3 MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED O5 GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. © 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello MANHOLE MANHOLE.... OR PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH BASIN BASIN DIA DIA SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK MASONRY CONSTRUCTION Title: Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 4001 03-15 PROPOSED STORM SEWER 8'X 12' INSULATION AT PIPE CROSSING 8'X 20' INSULATION FOR BOX SEE PLATE 2006 45' BENDS FOR DETAILS (TYPICAL) 6" WATERMAIN \ � VARIES MEGA -LUG 20' (TYPICAL) NOTE: PROVIDE 2 TIE RODS FROM BEND TO BEND. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10' OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTRAINED USING TIE RODS. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello A CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R- 3067 -V 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ADJUSTING RINGS - 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR PLAN Title: Watermain Offset late: 03 -05 Plate No. 2005 Revised: 03 -15 A 35 1/4 " 43" ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) 6" NOTES: SECTION A —A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R- 3508 -A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Catch Basin Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 4002 STANDARD DETAILS O T O N O C0 O W (A Y W 2 U J_ U Q `z G J W O U D Z 0 OE 0 LL 0 Z I 01 z J W ■■■ MEN ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■ - ■ ■■■■■■■■■ ROADWAY SURFACE SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 EME■■■■■■■■ FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II ■EN■■ PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE ■■ ■A ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD z z 8" CAST -IN -PLACE ■■■■N PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP °-� © CONCRETE OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN -PLACE o = N 4` TO 10' CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION � (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED N BY ENGINEER 0 o N CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON o } OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE v z HIM AND PIPE CONNECTION = N a c� 0,1MIifN■■ ' f��i■ U m Mon. � 02 M K•AM■ Q STRUCTURE 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O1 REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. O3 MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED O5 GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. © 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello MANHOLE MANHOLE.... OR PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH BASIN BASIN DIA DIA SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK MASONRY CONSTRUCTION Title: Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 4001 03-15 PROPOSED STORM SEWER 8'X 12' INSULATION AT PIPE CROSSING 8'X 20' INSULATION FOR BOX SEE PLATE 2006 45' BENDS FOR DETAILS (TYPICAL) 6" WATERMAIN \ � VARIES MEGA -LUG 20' (TYPICAL) NOTE: PROVIDE 2 TIE RODS FROM BEND TO BEND. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10' OF A BEND SHALL BE RESTRAINED USING TIE RODS. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello A CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R- 3067 -V 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ADJUSTING RINGS - 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR PLAN Title: Watermain Offset late: 03 -05 Plate No. 2005 Revised: 03 -15 A 35 1/4 " 43" ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) 6" NOTES: SECTION A —A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R- 3508 -A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Catch Basin Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 4002 STANDARD DETAILS O T O N O C0 O W (A Y W 2 U J_ U Q `z G J W O U D Z 0 OE 0 LL 0 Z I 01 z J W ■■■ MEN ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■ - ■ ■■■■■■■■■ EME■■■■■■■■ ■EN■■ ■■ ■A �2_0�_ ■ ■■■■N smoisomma-lg. HIM 0,1MIifN■■ ' f��i■ nomm? Mon. 02 M K•AM■ ■� ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■1 1■■ ■ ■VI■■■■■M■R • • • • ■■ ■■1■■ • ■■ ■■1 ■1111 ■. • ■■■11010. • • • • • , • ■ ■ ■■1 ■■1 ■ ■■1. ■ ■VI■■■ ■ ■FUuG ■ ■���tc11�■ ■ ■1111 ■f:A� •'�■ Ebb, -9 ME, ■■ ■■ ■■ \fir ■■ � ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■1 1■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■©■■■■■■■ ■■n ■ ■��,� ■■ ■■1M■ ■MWR1M■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■` ■��JJ■ ■■ ■FTwwI■ ■iii ■� ■�■ ■� ■ ■1� ■Its ■�_ ■ ■ ■■ ■iii ■� ■1�1■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ I" PER FT SLOP CONCRETE- 6" 20 NOTES 1. FOR AREAS WHERE DRAINAGE IS DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE CURB, THE GUTTER SHALL BE TILTED TO DRAIN FROM THE CURB 2. CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A22 3. MNDOT B612 CURB AND GUTTER SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 7100 2" MIN. COMPACTED MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE BELOW CURB AND GUTTER APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE CURB & GUTTER (MNDOT B612) - PARKING LOT CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 2521.3C2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION NTS COr POUHLU IN I LGHALLY WITH CURB JOINTS) v 1 � - A JOINTS 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER a e a , 7" MIN. WIDTH VARIES SECTION B —B PLAN VAR/ABLE F1/4 pER� /4 „��, Ez a� 3 T7„ 5' MIN. 18" Standard Plate Library City of Monticello DCIKIC(1D!"CAACAIT- 4A D A DC SECTION A —A Title: Commercial Driveway Entrance Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 5008 NOTE: PLACE CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT AT THE MIDDLE OF THE PAVEMENT THICKNESS 7" CONCRETE ( MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3Y43) 6" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE APRON /PAVEMENT SECTION 4" CONCRETE ( MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) PARKING LOT 4" CONCRETE ( MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) 1" CHAMFER 4" MNDOT 3149.262 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 6" s 6'a = II —III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlllllII I IIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlllllII APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4" MNDOT 3149.2132 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. APPROVED COMPACTED 2521.3C2 SUBGRADE NTS THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK NTS NTS HNI EXPAND (TYPICP TRUE AS P PLA1 �__3' MIN. 7 SLOPE 3/4 " /FT. SECTION A —A Standard Plate Library City of Monticello B -618 — 3' WIDE B -624 — 4' WIDE Title: Typical Concrete Valley Gutter late` 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 5009 ADA RAMP NTS 12' BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE ( MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPWEB340B) TACK COAT BETWEEN BITUMINOUS COURSES 1z' BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE ( MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPNWB330B) 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (PARKING LOT T 0 N O co O I W U) Y W _ U J_ U Q z 2 J W ir NTS z O ■E ■E ■EN D ROVE ■E ■E z 1z' BITUMINOUS WEARING O COURSE ( MNDOT 2360 TYPE U SPWEB340B) O TACK COAT BETWEEN ■ BITUMINOUS COURSES I- O zonommoom 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE ( MNDOT 2360 TYPE } SPNWB330B) ■_me■■m Q z 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 ■m AGGREGATE BASE S0:E■1■ J W APPROVED COMPACTED EE SUBGRADE ■N BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (PUBLIC R /W) NTS TRUNCATED DOMES AS PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 7038A 0Q� 01 a ADA RAMP o C', ° ' ° °�o� o°(,) d a b PAVEMENT 6" CURB FACE STANDARD DETAILS 6" CURB FACE NTS ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ - ■■■ NONE■ N ■NEE ■ ■E■ ■E ■E ■EN ROVE ■E ■E ■EN ■iN■■ ■ ■ ■A zonommoom ■_me■■m ■ ■m S0:E■1■ EE ■N KNESEEM<I`+.EN ■II■NE■■ ■EEN EMENE Oman iaim■■ ' Em■ anaa■■mmom EN■%■ ■EE■ NOON■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■M■ MONOMER ' • ' • ' ' • . • • , . . ■■limm ■■NI ■N ■■oI ■d ■■NIE " MEMO" No moll i „ m Emil 11 ■■ ■■ ■E ■E ■E■■ ■ ■EME ': 1111E ■■ N ■PA■■INNEME NET_ ■����■ ■■NMEME ■■l■ ■■o■ ■E■ ■E■ ■■INAMM : ■EE■ ■&h, -9I r. SEEN ■E■ ■E ■E ■EN ■ ■ ■1 1■■ ■ ■ENE■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■E■■■Em7■■ ■■19■■ffzA■■ NEA■■ENi■■ NERMENEMEN ■NCq■■rEm■■ ■■ H ■ ■lush ■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■ ■E ■E ■E ■E■■ ■_■■LJE■_■ ■ ■E ■E ■E ■EN ■■■E■EEE■■ N ■ ■ ■ ■ ■�J ■ ■■ ■■■ ■1%MzME■ ■E■EME■IENE ■ ■ ■ ■m ■n■ ■■9■@■La■ ” ■■m■I.I ■■I■ ■ ■Eli ■�_ ■ ■■■■9Mft■■■ ■■■■■ ■AI■■■ ■■■■■■W■■■ ■■■■■■m■■■ ■ ■E ■ENE ■EN ■ ■ ■r 1■■ ■ .:®n■■■■■■ - a ■NOON■■■ 1 EMMEME■■ EE ■E■■■■ ■ ■E ■E ■E■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ 0-001 7■■ —■ ■ ■ ■■m NOON NOTE: CROSS -SLOPE OF SIDEWALK AND PAVER AREAS WITHIN CITY RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE 2.0% RIM = 928.61 INV = 922.10 � ss RIM = 927.28 _ INV. = 923.98 - 92 q INV -92 S MHl IM - 928.80 INV 922.47 28.54 30 LF EX / t *44�1 RIM = 62 INV. = 9 1.94 CONNECTTO ISTI G 15" RCP STUB INV = 922.33 (FIELD VERI ) RETAINING WALL 31.4 LENGTH = 38 -LF HEIGHT= 0 TO 1'- ti FIBER OPTIC O O R = 931.22 = 931.29 INV. = 923.4 5 INV. = 922.8 M = 931.28 5 5 5 INV. = 920.37 RIM = 931.14 \ / INV. 927.93 _/= RIM = 931.19 INV. = 927.32 S = 927.94 �Q2I.M f RIM = 9 7.80 INV. = 3.64 RIM = 9 7.28 T INV. = 23.0 y �T 142 LF 12" RCP- @ 0.45% �\ � 70 \_�S f H2 55 RIM - 65 INV = 922. OSED APART T BUILDING FFE = 1031.60 HOUSE II _& S DRI%t. I NOTE: CROSS -SLOPE OF SIDEWALK AND PAVER AREAS WITHIN CITY RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE 2.0% / / OPOSED DE HED GARAG E = 1029.. wr% � \ C d / / / �G ' HOUSE IDEWA ROSS -DR 3p•65 / / / / I / -J / / 0 RIM = 927.09 / INV. = 97_4.22 / / / GA� RIM = 927.55 INV. = 924.27/ / CB 1 RIM = 927.10 INV = 923.10 27.55 T/ PROPOSEDj0 DETACHED jo'.'l GARAGE // ` 2 •9S2,S0 FFE = 1028.00 ►r"lv, TFp /T PROPOSED 6S �� DETACHED 8 -S GARAGE �TFp FFE = 1028.67 ? 30 88`3 PROPOSED \TFp DETACHED ? ?95 GARAGE 9S 0 FF 029.33 ^o .rV~ PROPOSED �7 DETACHED GARAGE FFE = 1030.00 PROPOSED' DETACHED GARAGE FFE = 1030.67 BUILDING / / / / / / / / / / \ / 0 N ' NV. - 925.86 / 4 \ / \ STUMP \ / 0 / M =93.0 INV. = 917.74 \ 3o,,� cAs �O � VI RIM = 928.82 INV. = 924.15 GRADING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS, AND RIM AND INVERT ELEVATIONS, OF EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURES. LOCATION AND SIZE OF EXISTING SANITARY, WATER, AND STORM SEWER STUBS, AND EXISTING GRADES SHALL ALSO BE VERIFIED. 2. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY PROVIDED BY O'MALLEY & KRON LAND SURVEYORS, COLD SPRING, MN (320) 685 -5905. 3. BENCHMARK: CONTACT O'MALLEY & KRON LAND SURVEYORS 4. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY INCONSISTENCIES ARE DISCOVERED BETWEEN ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WHICH ARE SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO ALTER THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS. 5. IF REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY STORM SEWER UTILITIES. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER ONE CALL AT (800) 252-1166 FOR A UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFY LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 7. SEE SHEET C2 FOR STANDARD DETAILS. 8. HDPE STORM SEWER CROSSING ABOVE AND WITHIN 10 -FT OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER MAIN OR SERVICES SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS PER THE MN PLUMBING CODE: 4" - 10" DIAMETER: AASHTO M252 12" - 60" DIAMETER: ASTM F2306 FITTINGS: ASTM D3212 SEE SHEET C6 FOR LOCATIONS OF NEW WATER MAIN AND SERVICES. 9. ALL LENGTHS OF STORM SEWER OR CULVERT PIPE SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN INCLUDE THE LENGTHS OF ANY ASSOCIATED FLARED END SECTIONS. 10. TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL STORM SEWER END SECTIONS. 11. FINISHED ELEVATIONS OF LAWN /GREEN AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR OR TOP -OF -BLOCK ELEVATION. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL BE BASED ON EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR 13. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE FLOW LINE AND /OR FINISHED GRADES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ARE 6" ABOVE THE FLOW LINE SPOT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 14. "EX" DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS 15. ALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF PAVING OR GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS CATCH BASINS AND /OR OUTLETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ELEVATIONS, WHICH WILL PROMOTE POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. NOTE: CADD FILES FOR ESTIMATING EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTORS FOR PREPARING BIDS. IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE CADD FILES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO SIGN A HOLD - HARMLESS AGREEMENT PROVIDED BY SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, AND AGREE TO PAY A $50 PROCESSING FEE. THE CADD FILES WILL BE RELEASED UPON RECEIPT OF THE CHECK GRADING PLAN 0 20 40 80 O N O C7 0 w Y W _ J > U z 2 J W ir IZ 0 U ir U) O Ir 0 O z I z J W ■ NOON, ■ ■■■■� NONE NONE E ■■► ■■■■■■■■■■ Nis■■ ■■ ■n ■ENNEN ■ ■E ■N IN. MEN ■NNNN 0 w1111 1111H ■r ffloqw Bloom ON ■ENNEN ■■■■■■■■o■ ■ ■1 1■■ ■ .NOON ■e ■N • . • , ` • ■■liN� No , No N No w No.• , ■ ■E ■E ■EN ■ ■�■ ■ANN ■■ MENU= In. IRMO ■■dA ■N ®NN■ ■■oN■■ ■N •) ■ ■ ■rIm■ ■ ■ ■in■ ■ ■IEMEEEE�■ moommiN ■Nom ■N■IIN■ ■ ■IXI■EE ■MEN ■■ui■ ■N ■NN■ ■EE■EIINNE■ ■N . � _9 lip, WHEN ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■1 1 ■E ■ ■■■■■■■■■■ NEE■■■■■■■ ■ ■N■ ■NNE ■■ ■ ■�a■ ■ESE■■ ■■ .. ■ ■NNE ■■ ■ ■N■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ NOON ■ ■w ■ ■■ ■■■■■■m■■■ moommomono ■ ■ ■ ■� ■ICI ■L�■ ■19110-m ■ ■r 10 is ■lmseximm ■1 ma BEEF■■■ NI ■■ ■■■■■■■pi■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■■m ' NOON PROJECT INFORMATION Protect Description This project will consist of the construction of a new 21 -Unit Apartment Building, as well as detached garages, with footprints totalling approximately 12,600 SF. Bituminous parking lot and driveway areas, and sidewalk will also be included. Disturbed Area & Impervious Surface Tabulation Anticipated Disturbed Area 0.76 acres Existing Impervious Area 0.20 acres Proposed Impervious Area 0.60 acres Net Impervious Area Increase 0.40 acres Permanent Site Drainage Site drainage will be routed off site to public storm sewer located in the adjacent Locust Street right -of -way via new storm sewer and sheet flow. Since new impervious surface area totals less than 1 acre, storm water management related to water quality is not included in the project. Receiving Surface Waters The following surface waters could receive storm water runoff from this project, and are within 1 mile of the project site: Surface Water Type of Surface Water Impaired Water? Special Water? USEPA Approved TMDL for Impaired Water? Comments Project not subject to EMEMENEEME NPDES Permit SEDIMENT AND OTHER POLLUTANTS This SWPPP has been designed mainly to provide erosion and sediment control of naturally occurring soils at this site (ie: sands, looms, and clays). Although this SWPPP does address pollution prevention of other man -made materials, it is assumed that these materials will consist of debris from existing structures and pavements to be demolished, or debris and chemicals (ie: fuels, new paints, etc.) resulting from new construction. There are no known solid wastes or hazardous materials buried below grade at this site. If such wastes or hazard materials are discovered during construction, the SWPPP Coordinator (described below) will be responsible for notifying the Engineer. This SWPPP will then be revised to address he presence and disposal of these additional pollutants EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS Standards and References Materials and construction methods of all BMPs included in this SWPPP shall be as per the Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction, latest edition. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and familiarize themselves with the specification sections applicable to this SWPPP, as there are several BMPs that specifically reference these sections. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall be expected to be familiar with the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with these specification sections. Undisturbed Areas If shown on the plan, the Contractor shall delineate areas that are not to be disturbed on the site. This may be done with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc., and shall be completed prior to the start of any grading operations. Regardless of the delineation method the Contractor chooses to use, the Contractor must communicate to his /her personnel and subcontractors that these areas are not to be disturbed and construction equipment (including trucks and personal vehicles) shall not be allowed in these areas. The Contractor shall minimize compaction and preserve topsoil as much as possible at the site. In pervious ( "green ") areas that are not essential to the construction of the project, the Contractor shall avoid construction traffic and maintain the existing condition of these areas. Temoorary and Permanent Stabilization All exposed soil areas (including stockpiles) shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 14 days of construction activity temporarily or permanently ceasing in that portion of the site. Temporary or permanent drainage ditches or swales, which drain off -site or to a surface water, and are within 200 lineal feet of the property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 24 hours of construction. Placement of temporary or permanent cover shall be initiated immediately upon suspension or completion of excavation operations. Temporary Cover If the Contractor chooses to halt grading operations in a portion of the site (or the whole site) for a period exceeding 14 days, and grading operations (rough or finish grading) in the affected areas has not yet been completed, temporary cover shall be placed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary cover within 24 hours of connection. Depending on the Contractor's schedule, the temporary cover shall consist of one of the following BMPs: 1). Discanchored Mulch a). Discanchored mulch may be used in an area of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively short, but exceeds 14 days. b). The mulch shall be Type 3 per MNDOT Spec. 3882 c). An adequate quantity of mulch shall be evenly distributed to achieve 90% coverage of the exposed soils. d). Mulch shall be placed as per MNDOT 2575.3F. e). All mulch shall be disc anchored as per MNDOT 2575.3G. Prior to the placement and discanchoring of the mulch, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.361. f). Any areas that are exposed as a result of wind action after the initial mulch placement shall be covered with additional mulch to maintain 90% coverage. 2). Temporary Seeding with Mulch a). Temporary seeding with mulch may be used in areas of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively long. Although mulch still needs to be applied as described above, once the temporary seeding /turf is established, the mulch will no longer need to be maintained. The temporary seeding /turf will require very little maintenance. b). Prior to the sowing of temporary seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.361. c). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mixes 100, 110, or 130 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for temporary seeding. d). Temporary seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3D. e). Once temporary seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above. Permanent Cover: Upon completion of finish grading and /or placement of topsoil, initiation of the placement of permanent cover shall begin immediately over all exposed areas. This includes areas designated for impervious surfacing (ie: buildings, pavements /gravel bases, sidewalks, etc.). Where the construction schedule will not allow for the placement of the permanent impervious surfacing within 14 days of the completion of finish grading, temporary cover shall be provided in these areas, as described above, until the permanent impervious surfacing can be constructed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water, shall be provided with permanent cover within 24 hours of connection. Areas designated for permanent turf establishment shall be provided with one or more of the following BMPs (see plan): 1). Permanent Seeding with Mulch a). Unless otherwise noted on the plans, all areas designated for turf establishment shall be provided with permanent seeding. b). In addition to the plan included as part of this SWPPP, the Contractor shall verify if a Landscaping Plan has been included in the plans by the Architect. If a Landscape Architect has specified higher quality permanent cover (ie: sod, hydroseeding, etc.), the Contractor shall provide this permanent cover in lieu of the permanent seeding specified in this SWPPP. c). Prior to the sowing of permanent seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.361. d). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mix 260 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for permanent seeding. e). Permanent seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3D. f). Once permanent seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above (under Temporary Cover), unless noted otherwise. 2). Erosion Control Blanket a). Erosion control blanket shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. These areas shall still be provided with permanent seeding, as described above, beneath the erosion control blanket. b). Erosion control blanket shall meet the requirements indicated in MNDOT Spec. 3885. See plan for category(s) of erosion control blanket. c). Erosion control blanket shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3-12. d). Erosion control blanket specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading (including permanent seeding). 3). Riprap a). Riprap shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). All riprap shall be underlain with Type 4 geotextile fabric. The fabric shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511.362. c). Riprap materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3601, and shall be Class 3, unless noted otherwise on the plans. d). Riprap shall be considered "Random Riprap" and shall be placed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511. e). Although it is permitted for the riprap to be placed with machinery, it will be necessary for the Contractor to hand place some of the riprap in order to provide a dense, well -keyed layer of stones with the least practical quantity of void space. f). The minimum thickness of the riprap shall be 18 inches, unless otherwise noted on the plans. g). Riprap designated at the end of pipe outlets shall be placed within 24 hours of installation of the pipe outlet end section. h). Riprap specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading. Sediment Control The following sediment control BMPs shall be implemented as part of this project: 1). Silt Fence a). Silt fence shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Silt fence shall be machine sliced and materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). Silt fence shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3C1. d). Silt fence shall be installed prior to any upgradient grading operations, and shall remain in place and maintained adequately until upgradient areas achieve Final Stabilization (see below) e). Silt fence shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment on the upstream side of the fence reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. Repair or replacement of silt fence shall be completed within 24 hours of discove ry . f). Portions of silt fence may be removed to accommodate short-term activities, such as vehicle passage. Short -term activities shall be completed as quickly as possible, and new silt fence installed immediately after completion of the short -term activity. If rainfall is imminent or forecasted in the near future, new silt shall be installed regardless of if the short term activity has been completed or not. The Contractor is advised to schedule short term activities during d weather as much as p g rY practicable. No additional compensation will be paid due to additional silt fence associated with short -term activities. g). Temporary soil stockpiles shall be placed on the site in areas upgradient from silt fence. Where the Contractor chooses to place temporary soil stockpiles outside designated silt fenced areas, the stockpiles shall be surrounded by additional silt fence. Under no circumstances shall temporary soil stockpiles be placed over surface waters, curb and gutter, catch basins, culvert inlets or outlets, or ditches. 2). Catch Basin Protection a). WIMCO Road Drain protection devices, as manufactured by WIMCO, shall be used for catch basin protection on this project. WIMCO can be contacted at (952)- 233 -3055, and their web page is www.roaddrain.com. b). "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be installed at all catch basin locations immediately after placement of the catch basin structures. "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until permanent surfacing is constructed (ie: curb and gutter, pavements, and /or gravel surfacing). In areas designated for turf establishment, "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas is established. c). Upon construction of the permanent surfacing, the "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be replaced with the WIMCO product specified on the plans. The WIMCO devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). The contractor shall install and maintain the catch basin protection devices as per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. 3). Culvert Inlet Protection a). Culvert inlet protection shall be provided at all culvert inlet locations immediately after construction of the culvert. See plan included in this SWPPP for culvert inlet locations. b). Culvert inlet protection shall consist of geotextile fabric wrapped around, and completely covering the inlet end section. The geotextile fabric shall be the same fabric used in silt fence applications and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). The culvert inlet protection shall remain in place and adequately maintained until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). Culvert inlet protection shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment reaches 1/2 of the diameter of the culvert pipe. Repair or replacement of culvert inlet protection shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. 4). Temporary Rock Construction Entrance a). Temporary rock construction entrances shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. See detail for temporary rock entrance design. b). If the Contractor chooses to access the site from locations other than where temporary rock entrances are specified on the plans, additional temporary rock entrances shall be placed at these locations, as well. c). Temporary rock entrance shall be constructed prior to the start of grading operations, and shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until Final Stabilization has been established. d). Temporary rock entrances shall be maintained in such a manner that the entrances prevent sediment tracking onto adjacent streets. If a temporary rock entrance is found to be ineffective, it shall be replaced or improved within 24 hours of discovery. e). The Contractor has the option to place Type 4 geotextile fabric beneath the temporary rock entrance. The fabric may extend the life of the entrance as it will reduce rock "sinking" into the underlying soils. If the Contractor chooses to use fabric, it should meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511.3B2. f). If sediment tracking from the site is discovered on adjacent streets, the sediment shall be removed with a street sweeper or other approved method within 24 hours of discovery. This shall be done throughout construction of the project. This sediment may be returned and graded over exposed areas of the site, or disposed of off site per MPCA requirements. The City may order street sweeping to be performed at the Contractor's or Owner's expense if City staff find that construction activities are resulting in sediment or debris being tracked onto City streets. 5). Filter Logs a). Filter logs shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Filter logs shall consist of Type Wood Fiber biorolls and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3897. c). Filter logs shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3J. d). Filter logs shall be installed immediately after placement of erosion control blanket e). Filter logs shall remain in place for the life of the project, and shall be allowed to degrade naturally. Dewatering If dewatering of sandy subsoils is required for this project, the pump discharge shall be treated prior to discharge off -site or into a surface water. Treatment of discharge shall be achieved with the use of a "Dandy Dewatering Bag" (or approved equivalent), as manufactured by Dandy Products,lnc. Dandy Products, Inc. can be contacted at (877) 307 -0141, and their web page is www.dandyproducts.com. The "Dandy Dewatering Bag" shall be installed, utilized, and maintained per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. Once dewatering water has been treated, it may be discharged off -site or to a surface water. The discharge shall be visually checked to ensure that it is relatively clean and not visibly different from any receiving waters. If discharge is noticeably "dirty ", the Engineer shall be contacted as additional treatment methods may be necessary. Adequate erosion control shall be provided at the point of discharge if it is located in an area with exposed soils or established turf. This erosion control may consist of temporarily placed rip rap, or other approved energy dissipation measures. The type of erosion control measure shall be at the Contractor's discretion, depending on the location of the dewatering discharge and the unique site characteristics. The erosion control measures shall be effective and shall be maintained adequately such that no erosion occurs at the point of discharge. Pollution Prevention Management Solid waste accumulated during construction, including collected sediment, construction materials, floating debris, construction debris, paper, plastics, and other solid wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA disposal requirements: 1). Building products that have the potential to leach pollutants shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by a similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with storm water. 2). Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemicals, and landscape materials shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary ry roofs ) to prevent the discharge of P ollutants or protected by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. 3). Hazardous materials, toxic waste, (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum -based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids) shall be properly stored in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access storage areas shall be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous materials shall be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. 4). Solid waste shall be stored, collected and disposed of properly in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. 5). Portable toilets shall be positioned so that they are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over Sanitary waste must be disposed of properly in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. The Contractor shall take steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. The Contractor shall conduct fueling in a contained area unless infeasible. The Contractor shall ensure adequate supplies are available at all times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled materials. The Contractor shall report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. § 115.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. If the Contractor washes the exterior of vehicles or equipment on the project site, washing shall be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff from the washing area shall be contained in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and waste from the washing activity shall be properly disposed of. The Contractor shall properly use and store soaps, detergents, or solvents. No engine degreasing shall be allowed on site. The Contractor shall provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. The liquid and solid washout wastes shall not contact the ground, and the containment shall be designed so that it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes shall be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCA rules. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposal of concrete and other washout wastes. FINAL STABILIZATION Final Stabilization shall be considered established once the following requirements have been achieved: 1). All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils are stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of its expected final growth density over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions. 2). The permanent storm water management system is constructed, and is operating as designed. Temporary or permanent sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins have been cleaned of any accumulated sediment. All sediment has been removed from conveyance systems and ditches are stabilized with permanent cover. 3). All temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs have been removed from the project site. BMPs designed to decompose on site may be left in place. SWPPP - NOTES O T O N O C7 O i W CD Y W _ U J_ U Q Z_ 2 J W Ir iZ O z 0 Ir O LL O Z Ir Z_ J W Ir iZ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■ - ■■■■■■■■■■ EMEMENEEME MEN■■ ■ ■ ■A �i�ll4 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■N NNW WREMEMEEN S�:■@11 SEEN 11,00 Eliffiffl, 11111151MENNIN IN." BOREN Oman SMMO■ MERE ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ME ■ ■ ■1 1■■ ■ !E■■ ■ ■ ■t1 ■M:1 • • • • • ■■■1■M ■ ■■1 ■11 ■■■ 11 11" • ■■■ ■1 ■11 • • momminm ■■ ■ ■1 - ' • . • • , . ' ■■ ■■ ■1 ■1 ■■ ■1. ' iiiifl ■ ■ ■� �� i ■ ■1_1■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■ 111191MI SRN ■■ 111101MMENNE■ ■■1111_ EME •,N■ ■E©N■M;L "V■ MERMEMEMEM ■EWE ■MEN •' ■ ■ERM■■■EV■ MENMENEENE ■■0■EN■EV■ MENNEWEEME ■■3■■ IMINIA■ ■■o■■iN.■mm■ MRIVEMMEMEM ■bkh -9 ME, MEMO ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ 110111111 ■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■©■■■■■■■ MEMEEMENEM NOWNERNMEM 111121M■■ IMME ■ERNIMINNE■ ■■m■■omm■■ MENEERRAME MERMININEMEM ■■m■■n���:,m■■ ■ ■r ■-1 ■ ■ommo■ ■ ■INEE�:601■■ MENEENEMEM ■E NEMERME■ ■■E■■■EE■■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■EE■■ ■_■■LAME -■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■E ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■m■■■ ■ ■EEM■ - ■ ■■ ■■■■9�I1�19rI110■ ■■■■I�i■V!' mem {� MINNIZEMENE ■■■■■■n■m■ EMEEMERENE MEMEMEME ■WEEMEN_ ER■ ■v■ ■o■©■S■ ■■■■©■g ■o■ ■E ■■911ama■ MEENEENEEM ■■■■■EWEE■ ■■■■■■EEM■ ■ ■ ■r 1■■ ■ rMEME■ ■EE■■ MEMSEEMENE MEMBEEMEME MEEMENEEME QomE■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■- ■ ■1 -7 ■■ -■ ■■■MORE■■■ ■■■LEEJ■■■ ■■■ ■m = ■■■■ 3 PLASTIC ZIP TIES 5' MINIMUM LENGTH STEEL T -POST AT LEAST 1 "APART & MAXIMUM SPACING (50LB TENSILE) POST NIPPLES FACES AWAY FROM LOCATED IN TOP 8" GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OF STEEL POST Z GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 3' WIDE Cl)) TIRE COMPACTION ZONE FLOW MACHINE SLICE 8" - 12" DEPTH N 1. USE PROPER EQUIPMENT SUCH THAT THE SOIL IS SLICED, NOT TURNED OVER. 2. AFTER SILT FENCE INSTALLATION, COMPACT THE SOIL MATERIALS PER MNDOT 3886 IMMEDIATELY NEXT TO THE GEOTEXTILE BY DRIVING INSTALLATION PER MNDOT 2573.3CI OVER IT WITH A TRACTOR TIRE AT LEAST TWICE SILT FENCE (MACHINE SLICED NTS CONSTRUCT BERM STAPLE PLASTIC AROUND ENTIRE SHEETING WASHOUT AREA EVERY 5' (TYP) 1' ------------ - - - - - - - i 2, �. CONCRETE WASHOUT 10 MIL PLASTIC SHEETING LINER PLACED WITHIN WASHOUT AREA 1. BOTTOM OF CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE 10'X10' 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE WASH LIQUID FROM CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA AND DISPOSE OF PER MPCA REQUIREMENTS WHEN WASHOUT AREA BECOMES HALF FULL. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SELECT THE MOST OPTIMAL LOCATION FOR THE CONCRETE WASHOUT NTS SWPPP - DETAILS O T O N O C7 O ( W Y W U J_ U Q z_ 5 G J W Ir W O U m� L.L U) z O 0 Ir O IL O z L.L z G J W Ir LL ■■■ ■■■ ■■■■■ ■E ■EE -E - ■■■■■■■■■■ EMEMINEEMEM Gravel pads) MnDOT Class CA -15 WING NUT ■EN■■ or CA -25 Riprop Bedding OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD ■■ Ah ■A Geotextile fabric Original io grade ATTACHMENT HOOK 0 0 0 SI: ■�l■ • • • MOE■ SILT FABRIC SLEEVE • • 3.3 �26 SECTION B —B PER MnDOT SPECIAL ®; ■IN■f� _ 3.3' 1.6' ■ not to scale) :® ®® ® PROVISION 3886 BORNE UNIVIIIIIII11 0 ® ® ® ® e 3.3, • • 3.3' Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates 11113MII�J 0 0 ■ ■ "11111:1f SMMd■ Original ESE■ 0.7 STAPLES PER SQ. YD 1.15 STAPLES PER SO. YD. 3.75 STAPLES PER SO. YD. Geotextile fabric SECT ON A —A grade p A 4:1 SLOPES 3:1 SLOPES HIGH FLOW CHANNEL& SHORELINE (not to scale) MENEENEEMIN ° ° NOTES: ■ 1111101111111111 Channelize runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device ■ ° ■ ■ ■ ■■■1 trapping device ■n1 .. ■■■I■m ° moolon ::v.•.:.::•:: :::. ♦ ♦ ♦ I moolion p 3B .. 4 ,—, � I o • • ,z• I ■■■OI , O moll ■■ I Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates ■I I i �M 0 A A R B 0 ■ ■■1,. i O Q / o 0 / ■■NOME■■■ 0 0 0 E 0 o O 0 / o 0 O OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD 3- ■■®■■ •.mm■■ O Oo 0 o SILT FABRIC SLEEVE Irc / o o 0 0 ° 'w ■■n■■m�m�oo■ PER MnDOT SPECIAL Q ° ■■1111■f:Af`r.1 PROVISION 3886 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. p o o Q / o or�'ivCCl//�i(v_l ■■©m�oot 2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" (15cm) DEEP X 6" (15cm) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12"(30­) OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES /STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. "o■ BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12"(30m) CD -,� ■ PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES /STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. B C/-) o 24 min . ` ■ ■�i ., ■ 3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES /STAKES Slope a W a y from X ■E■ IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE, WHEN USING OPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM, STAPLES /STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. ■ ■I w highway j 4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2 "S" 12.5cm) OVERLAP DEPENDING ■■m■ j VVIS (5a ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE COLORED SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. ■■om■m■Ew■ 5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 50 min. 3" (7.5c m) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA. APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. ■■m■■n■mm■ NOTE. Match or Right of Way Existing 'IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" (15cm) MAYBE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. Grade PLAN 111b: '9 ME, MEMO Title: — Title: ,I Title: Commercial Gravel Inlet Protection Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance ■ Standard Plate Library Grate Inlet Cover ■ ■l Standard Plate Library Stapling Patterns &Installation City f Monticello y Date: Plate No. ■■■■■■■■■■ City f Monticello Date: Plate No. y City f Monticello y Date: Plate No. 06 -14 03 -07 03 -08 f Revised: 6002 Revised: 6005 __ Revised: 6011 MEMEEMENEM 03 -15 03-15 03 -15 NOWNERNMEN 3 PLASTIC ZIP TIES 5' MINIMUM LENGTH STEEL T -POST AT LEAST 1 "APART & MAXIMUM SPACING (50LB TENSILE) POST NIPPLES FACES AWAY FROM LOCATED IN TOP 8" GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OF STEEL POST Z GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 3' WIDE Cl)) TIRE COMPACTION ZONE FLOW MACHINE SLICE 8" - 12" DEPTH N 1. USE PROPER EQUIPMENT SUCH THAT THE SOIL IS SLICED, NOT TURNED OVER. 2. AFTER SILT FENCE INSTALLATION, COMPACT THE SOIL MATERIALS PER MNDOT 3886 IMMEDIATELY NEXT TO THE GEOTEXTILE BY DRIVING INSTALLATION PER MNDOT 2573.3CI OVER IT WITH A TRACTOR TIRE AT LEAST TWICE SILT FENCE (MACHINE SLICED NTS CONSTRUCT BERM STAPLE PLASTIC AROUND ENTIRE SHEETING WASHOUT AREA EVERY 5' (TYP) 1' ------------ - - - - - - - i 2, �. CONCRETE WASHOUT 10 MIL PLASTIC SHEETING LINER PLACED WITHIN WASHOUT AREA 1. BOTTOM OF CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE 10'X10' 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE WASH LIQUID FROM CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA AND DISPOSE OF PER MPCA REQUIREMENTS WHEN WASHOUT AREA BECOMES HALF FULL. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SELECT THE MOST OPTIMAL LOCATION FOR THE CONCRETE WASHOUT NTS SWPPP - DETAILS O T O N O C7 O ( W Y W U J_ U Q z_ 5 G J W Ir W O U m� L.L U) z O 0 Ir O IL O z L.L z G J W Ir LL ■■■ ■■■ ■■■■■ ■E ■EE -E - ■■■■■■■■■■ EMEMINEEMEM ■EN■■ ■■ ■A SI: ■�l■ MOE■ ■IN■f� ■ ■���■ BORNE UNIVIIIIIII11 11113MII�J ■ ■ "11111:1f SMMd■ ESE■ ■■■■■■■■■■ MENEENEEMIN ■ 1111101111111111 ■ ME ■ ■ ■ ■■■1 ■n1 .. ■■■I■m moolon I moolion • • ■■■OI , • • • • • 1 • • -11011101111111111 moll ■■ ■I • �M ■ ■ ■■1,. ■■NOME■■■ ■■®■■ •.mm■■ ■■g■■mmm■■ ■■n■■m�m�oo■ ■■1111■f:Af`r.1 •gym■ ■■©m�oot "o■ ■ ■fir ■ ■ ■�i ., ■ ■■am■■■ ■E■ ■ ■I Jf■■■■Ml■ ■■m■ ■E■ ■E■ ■■om■m■Ew■ ■■m■■n■mm■ 111b: '9 ME, MEMO ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■l 1■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■©■■■■■■■ MEMEEMENEM NOWNERNMEN ■■m■■■mm■■ ■■nommomom ■■m■■■i,■■■ ■■m■■mai■■ ■■s■■mum■■ ■ ■C M ■ ■�n�am ■■ ■■HIMERNM ■■ ■E N■EERIME■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■EE■ ■EE■■ ■_■■LAME -■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■Ir��■rirllI■E{�■ ■ ■■ ■iii ■V!'i ■C�l■ ■r ■ri.11■gym�■rnr•11■ ■o■©[�■XI■ ■■■■© ■I/1■^■ ■■■■u■a■e■ ■EE■�EZEMM■ ■ ■ ■ ■�li uu'jj ofto ■■ ■■■■■■m■■■ ■EME MELEE■ ■■■EE■EEM1■ ■ ■ ■r N■■ ■ rMEME ■ ■ ■EE■ MEMSEEMENE MEMBEEMENE MEEMEMINEEM BEEMENEENE ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■LEoE■■■ ■■■ ■M = ■■■■ / RIM = 928.61 INV = 922.10 5 s INSTALL CATCH NG BASIN PROTECTI RIM = 927.28 `� INV. = 923.98 �� INV. _ 923 3 9 / / RIM = 9 7.80 INV. = 3.64 RIM 9 8 INV. =23 0 rVb o: R = 927.94 - 21.0 TEMPORARY ROC CONSTRUCTION FENCE �� RIME ER SILT ENTRANCE RIM = .62 INV. = 9 1.9-1 I , INSTALL CAT BASIN PROT CTI N Q. UQ PERIMETER SILT FENCE (TYP) FIBER OPTIC O R = 931.22 = 931.29 INV. = 923.4 5 INV. = 922.8 M = 931.28 5 5 5 INV. = 920.37 FAS- BUILT) SOD OR CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL / BLANKET \ OSED APART T BUILDING FFE = 1031.60 HOUSE / Q' ��& SDRIy WA RIM = 931.14 - \ 11W-7 INV. = 927.93 J 101 RIM = 931.19 INV. = 927.32 PERT SILT \ FENCE (TY \ CAS TookTEMPORA CONSTRUCTIO ENTRANCE u E N ON HOUSE / / RIM = 927.55 / / INV. = 924.27 RIM = 927.09 / / INV. = 924.22 GAS PERIA4ETER SI FENCE (TYP) D \ / INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION OMPOS� •�� �-9, ( � PROPD�0 S �lDETACHED GARAGE // ` FFE = 1028.00 ►r"lv, �TFp / PROPOSED DETACHED 8 GARAGE s FFE = 1028.67 PROPOSED 8 DETACHED �TFp GARAGE FF 029.33 STFp 4 Q7 PROPOSED "• ^�,G7 DETACHED GARAGE FFE = 1030.00 / PROPOSED' / DETACHED GARAGE FFE = 1030.67 PERIMETER SILT FENCE (TYP) 'I - 58 BUILDING / / / / / �,\ ❑T NV. = 925.86 / Q� / STUMP \ / O � / M =93.0 INV. = 917.74 0 RIM = 928.82 S'TO INV. = 924.15 INSTA ATC BASIN PRO TIO SWPPP - PLAN 0 20 40 80 0 N O C7 I W Y W U U z J W _O F D z O Ir O LL O z I z J W ■ 7 ■ ■■■■■ ■■L ■■■■■■■■■■ 110■ ■ ■■■■■■ OENEM ■ ■ ■n ■■■■ ■O R. = go Oman, • ■ ffloqw offinom Bloom ■W■ ■ ■■■■ ■■■■■■■■M■ ■ ■1 1■■ ■ ■■ ■■ ■11■M .. . ' ■ ■ ■1 ■M No ■■ , ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■ ■■R■■ W. 11E■■ ■■rA■■INNE■■ ■■ AMEE r. �I ■■ ■■©H ■ILUME■ ■■MPR■M®ME■ ■■WMEN■W •' ■ ■■ram■■■ ■E■ ■■ISM■■■■011 ■■0 ■ ■IN"■■ RM ■ ■VAN ■WEEM■ ■ ■NEMIN■ �. E■ ■■1W■■N ■111■ MWEEMMENEM Ebb, "!1 ME, MEMO ■■,AWINF I ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ 110111111 ■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■©■■■■■■■ ■■LSEEMEN■■ ■■W■■RIDI■■ ■ ■2■ ■■RM■■ ■MIME■ ■S■■■ ■■19■■RRA■■ ■■N■ ■12201■■ 1111591M■NEM■■ ■■ .� ■ ■�msmm■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■- ■■1--j■■ -■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ ■■ ENIM ■■■■■■L■■■ ■■■■iff■ -moll ■ ■ ■ ■frr���■r�r--lII■M_ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I�i■z�IMlM■ ■ ■■ ■Z ■I ENE ■ME122 ■ 1111 M■ EEMMERENE MEEMEME • ■■■■oI�■w■ ' ' INNERESM ■a ■ [2■2 ■li■w ■b■ ■ ■■©■R■R■ ■■ ■ ■911f'> ll a■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■ZEN■ ■■■■9■ft■ ■■ ■■■■■■EEM ■■■■■■W■■■ ■■■■■■N■■■ ■■■■■■■■M■ 11-1101-11011-11 ■EMEME ■n■■ ■EMENEW11111 OmMu■■r 10 is ©■EM MILM ■1 ma BEEME■■ ■1 ■■ ■■■■■■m•n■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ IQM ■MME■■■■ 11-11011-11011-11 EMEMONUMME ■ ■■ONMEE■■ ■■■■m ' NOON RIM = 931.14 INV. = 927.93 / EXISTING RIM = 928.61 HYDRANT INV = 922.10 5 S RIM = 927.28 = 927.34 / INV. = 923.98 INV -923 RIM = 9 7.80 INV. = 3.64 RIM = 9 7.28 T INV. = 210 y O� � �T MATC EXIS NGCURB �� � ^�, G c��1VT / DV BETE DRI WA M�• �: j� , G / PAVERS (TYP) J ��/ (VERIFY W/ CITY) = 927.94 I - .21.0 CONNECT TO EXIST G S 8" SAN. STUB B618 UR k" INV = 921.45 & TTE (FIELD VERIFY) CO CRE E DRIVEW Y ENTRA CE / / 7' \ r 2 EAN RIM - 28.45 i INV = 92 . OPOSE � B61 CURB & DE HED / G TER (TYP) 6 ARAG CK ISTI a CLEAN E = 1029.40 ST AS N CES ARY .60 j INV = 1.68 GHQ a ADA RAMP -, (TYP) C NNE TO ISTI BITUMINO 81, PAVEMENT 8 "X6' DUC R a PARKING L ) 6" 5° B DS RIM = INV. = 9 RETAINING WALL v 922.33 LENGTH = 38 -LF Q� bOe Vin' a '`E S BUILT) HEIGHT = 0 TO ' -8" / a 6" P SAN. SERVICE 6612 C RB & / INV @ BL = 922.10 GUTTER YP) (2) '45 a a SIDEWALTE BITUMIN US ° BENDS PAVEME as (PARKING L T) 6" DIP WATER SERVICE \ / 6"X4" TEE (FIRE CONTROL) / 4 90 BEND 4" DIP WATER SERVICE PAVERS (TYP) W/ 4" GATE VALVE & BOX A RAMP TU P N� (VERIFY W/ CITY) r , r UC (DOMESTIC) NOTE: VERIFY SIZES, LOCATIONS, AND FIBER OPTIC / DEPTHS OF NEW UTILITY SERVICES W/ CONCRETE a c T ONE G L UMBING PLANS SIDEWALK O RIM = 931.19 INV. = 927.32 B618 CURB & GUTTER •' ■■■■■■■■■■ OSED r CONCRETE APAR T a SIDEWALK BUILDING ■EN■■ FFE = 1031.60 ■ CONCRETE , ozoo■■■■■■ ISTING HOUSE / TIO / a HYDRANT o O ■E ■e a 5IPIRM1@■ ADA R MPS ° MEE■ ENRE ■ ■MME■ smo � � i�, a THI ENED EDGE SIDEW K Q, nommoommom $ CONCRETE BRAME BITUMINO R = 931.22 1N ugDEWALK / PAVEMENT ■■■■■■■■■■ = INV. 923.4 D �U W (PARKING LOT) = 931.29 5 ■■■■■■■■.■ A � HOUSE INV. = 922.8 5 5 M = 931.28 5 INV. = 920.37 ■ ■ ■1 RIM = 931.19 INV. = 927.32 B618 CURB & GUTTER •' ■■■■■■■■■■ r to■■■■■■■■ ■EN■■ VALLE ER Be r, OAST G G� N AY CROSS -DRA},} B612 CU GUTTER CITY) / / h / / RIM = 927.55 / / INV. = 924.27 I / / RIM = 927.09 / INV. = 924.224.2 2 CONCRETE / PAVEMENT / / D / CONCRETE PAVEMENT OMPOST 9l, 8612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) PROPOSED'iOs��� DETACHED l) GARAGE // FFE = 1028.00 ►r"lv, �TFp / PROPOSED DETACHED 8„ GARAGE \TFp FFE = 1028.67 \ PROPOSED �TFO DETACHED GARAGE FF 029.33 / 8 STFp 4 .rV PROPOSED O �7 ^, DETACHED GARAGE FE = 1030.00 / PROPOSED' / DETACHED GARAGE FFE = 1030.67 CONCRETE SIDEWALK RI - 58 BUILDING / / / / r / / / / / � / ❑T ° NV. = 925.86 J O \ STUMP \ / O / NOTE: PU I SIDEWALK & ERS T CONSTRUCTED \ T STREET M =93.0 \ \ / INV. = 917.74 0 RIM = 928.82 INV. = 924.15 UTILITY AND SURFACING NOTES: WATER AND SANITARY SEWER UTILITIES 1. WATER MAIN AND ANY WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 2. IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED WHERE WATER MAIN CROSSES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, SERVICE LINES, OR STORM SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE RAISED OR LOWERED APPROPRIATELY WHILE STILL MAINTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 3. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE STORM SEWER CROSSES SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, OR ASSOCIATED SERVICES. INSULATION SHALL CONSIST OF AN 8 -FT X 8 -FT SQUARE OF 3" -THICK RIGID INSULATION. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE STORM SEWER AND PIPE CROSSING WITH THE EDGES OF THE INSULATION PARALLEL TO THE PIPING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 4. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE 5. SEE SHEET C3 FOR STORM SEWER GRADING, AND SHEET C2 FOR MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS RELATING TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE UTILITIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 7. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, AND ORDERING ASSOCIATED MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR'S PLUMBING DESIGNER SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEER WITH THE TOTAL DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS (DFUs) FOR THE INTERIOR PLUMBING TO VERIFY THE CORRECT SIZING AND SLOPE OF THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE OWNER /CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AFTER THE PLUMBING PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND ANY AND ALL PERTINENT COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED ON THE PLAN AND IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. SURFACING 1. SUBGRADES SHALL BE SCARIFIED AND /OR COMPACTED AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN THE REQUIRED COMPACTION DESCRIBED IN THE GENERAL NOTES (SHEET Cl). TEST ROLLING OF THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR TECHNICIAN. LOCATIONS EXHIBITING EXCESSIVE RUTTING (PER MNDOT SPEC. 21 1 1) SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE. COMPACTION TESTING IN UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM. 2. GRAVEL BASE COURSES SHALL BE ROLLED AND COMPACTED. TEST ROLLING OF THE GRAVEL BASE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A SOILS ENGINEER TO VERIFY STABILITY. 3. ALL EXISTING BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE EDGES, WHICH WILL ABUT NEW BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE SURFACING SHALL BE SAWCUT TO OBTAIN A VERTICAL EDGE. 4. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE NEW CONCRETE ABUTS EXISTING CONCRETE, AND AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE SEPARATE CONCRETE POURS ABUT EACH OTHER. 5. SEE SHEET Cl FOR SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS, AND CURB AND GUTTER. UTILITY & PAVING PLAN 0 20 40 80 T 0 N O 0 W CD Y W U J_ U z J W Ir IZ O U U) 0 Ir 0 O z z J W Ir a_ MEN MEN ■■■ NONE m ■■■■■ ■ - ■■■■■■■■■■ to■■■■■■■■ ■EN■■ ■ ■ ■A ozoo■■■■■■ ■g'e■■ ■E ■e 5IPIRM1@■ MEE■ ENRE ■ ■MME■ smo i�, BORNE nommoommom BRAME MERE ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■.■ ■ ■ ■1 1■■ ■ MEN MONOMER • • ' • • • • ■■, I■m ■ ■,I■n ■■■,I■n ■ ■ ■,I■ i M■■,I■" • ■■ ■,I■w WIN, MmMlllmm- moll moll . ' • • • , • moll ■ ■LA■■■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■■`®J■■ •. E■■ ■ ■■ ■lmmm ■■ ■ ■FUJG ■EE� E■■ ■ ■1111 ■f:Af`r.1 �r• �■ ■■mm■mmmin■ ■■or■■■w •' ■ ■■ramm■■■ ■ ■EI JMEEEE�I■ ■■L!q■■E■■ln■ ■■voi' min. EEIME ■ ■C+7 ■ ■in■ICE■ ■■iw■■lm.■mm■ ■mm■mIIoomm ■b. 9 IF, ■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ NOWNERNMEM ■■E■■■E+7■■ ■■n■■EEm■■ ■EMEENRIME■ ■■m■■nam■■ ■■A■■EEi■■ ■ ■L-J ■ ■mil, ■■ ■■ m■ ■�r;�ae� ■■ ■ ■r ■r--ll■ ■�i mmm momemom ■■ : ■■msm■■ ■■ m■■sam■■ ■■E■■■■■■■ ■ ■EE ■■EE■■ ■_■■LAME -■ ■ ■ ■E ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■m■■■ ■■■■■■m■■■ ■■■■ICE _■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■fr��■�l■ ■■ ■■ ■■■I ■mmem ■E ■ ■EE■IENE ■■ ■E■■■ • Em ■I.I ■a■ ■■■■■a■ ■SMINEWE ■[2 ■E, ■M■ ■NE© ■SM ■■■■©■g ■E■ ■ ■ ■ ■u■amem ■■■■■■a■u■ ■■■■moft■■■ MENEEMINEEM ■■■■■■w■■■ ■■■■■■m■■■ ■■■■■■■■o■ ■ ■ ■r 1■■ ■ MEMENEEMEN ■EME■■WMI■ 111119110-m■■►1►1 Is ©EE■ - -Mm ■I mJ 13EEE■■■ ■I ■■ ■■■■■■■pn■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ QEM ■EE■■■■ 0- 001 -7■■ -0 ■■■rur7■■■ ■■ ■L ■LE■■■ ■■■■m ' ■■■■ SURVEYORS NOTE- UNDERLYING EASEMENTS MAY EXIST AND ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. �• RIM = INV. _ , R = 927.94 INV. 21. �� RIM = 928.18 INV. = 924.20 12 RIM - 928.13 INV. - 919.35 \ R 7NA RIM - 928.50 INV. = 921.0 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY -9244 PREPARED FOR NELSON BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT S610 Tract of land lying and being in the County of Wright, State of / 4 O SS2 Minnesota, Described as follows, to -wit: 0 Lots 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 and the West 16.00 feet of Lot 8, all in Block Thirty -six in the TOWNSITE OF MONTICELLO as of public S) record, Wright County, Minnesota. / �UIL�lN / c / r2 / RIM = M. = 23.6.6 4 928 / /STO )V4 / Sp, Subject to easements of record. Containing 1.71 acres, more or less. RIM = 927/58 INV. =9 _.82 BvI�'01 / 930 " Y \ _ 0 / \ / RIM = 927.55 INV. 924.2 F : Z • ��``H � � = RIM = 928.2 RIM = 927.09 INV. = 921.4 jy / INV. = 924.22 G9 0 / PID #155010036011 30 0 15 30 60 TU P O / \ COMPOST �91� / / • / BUILDING SCALE IN FEET STONE G L/ 0 FIBER OPTIC ";\ �61 a ; ;Y �\ / /.^ 9 , �) �\ / / • INDICATES IRON MONUMENT FOUND INDICATES CATCH BASIN HOUSE / �� \ / © INDICATES MAN HOLE 93r PID #155010036010 4*� \ / INDICATES WATER VALVE a / �� " ? 931 9 / 7 INDICATES HYDRANT BUILDING � Za 93 w / / INDICATES TREE R = 931.22 BIT UMI]IO IN = 923.a ' F US D / ^O N / o INDICATES POWER POLE >� = 931.29 ^.,•.• ; PARKING & vEWAY HOUSE INV. = 922. INV. = 31.3i ~ 5 W� (JRB / �Q b �• o RIM = 931.1 a / m INDICATES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL INV. = 927.93 INDICATES LIGHT POLE RIM = 937.3 INV. = 927.32 /BUILDING 12 / RIM 929.58 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY - V.= 925.86 0WALLEY & BOE LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 328 SW THIRD STREET - 210 MAIN STREET STOP \ / WILLMAR, MN 56201 COLD SPRING, MN 56320 PH. 320 - 235 -4012 PH. 320-685-5905 FAX 320 - 2214 -9380 FAX 320 - 685 -3056 \ �` ■ RIM = 930.00 / INV. = 917.7 \ \ • \ \ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR \ / UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. \ RIM = 928.82 REG. NO. 42300 DATE: 8 -15 -05 \ INV. = 924.15 BENJAMIN C. O'MALLEY \ NOTE: THIS SURVEY IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE BENEFIT 92 OF THE PARTY TO WHOM IT WAS PREPARED FOR AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE WITHOUT FIRST \ CONTACITNG THE SURVEYOR WHO DEVELOPED AND RIM RIM - 929.75 MADE THIS DRAWING. INV. = 925.22 RIM - 929.73 INV. = 921.37 M. = 915.66 ti U ao O RIM = 928.61 / M. 922.10 RIM = 927.28 \ \IN% INV. = 923.98 �• RIM = INV. _ , R = 927.94 INV. 21. �� RIM = 928.18 INV. = 924.20 12 RIM - 928.13 INV. - 919.35 \ R 7NA RIM - 928.50 INV. = 921.0 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY -9244 PREPARED FOR NELSON BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT S610 Tract of land lying and being in the County of Wright, State of / 4 O SS2 Minnesota, Described as follows, to -wit: 0 Lots 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 and the West 16.00 feet of Lot 8, all in Block Thirty -six in the TOWNSITE OF MONTICELLO as of public S) record, Wright County, Minnesota. / �UIL�lN / c / r2 / RIM = M. = 23.6.6 4 928 / /STO )V4 / Sp, Subject to easements of record. Containing 1.71 acres, more or less. RIM = 927/58 INV. =9 _.82 BvI�'01 / 930 " Y \ _ 0 / \ / RIM = 927.55 INV. 924.2 F : Z • ��``H � � = RIM = 928.2 RIM = 927.09 INV. = 921.4 jy / INV. = 924.22 G9 0 / PID #155010036011 30 0 15 30 60 TU P O / \ COMPOST �91� / / • / BUILDING SCALE IN FEET STONE G L/ 0 FIBER OPTIC ";\ �61 a ; ;Y �\ / /.^ 9 , �) �\ / / • INDICATES IRON MONUMENT FOUND INDICATES CATCH BASIN HOUSE / �� \ / © INDICATES MAN HOLE 93r PID #155010036010 4*� \ / INDICATES WATER VALVE a / �� " ? 931 9 / 7 INDICATES HYDRANT BUILDING � Za 93 w / / INDICATES TREE R = 931.22 BIT UMI]IO IN = 923.a ' F US D / ^O N / o INDICATES POWER POLE >� = 931.29 ^.,•.• ; PARKING & vEWAY HOUSE INV. = 922. INV. = 31.3i ~ 5 W� (JRB / �Q b �• o RIM = 931.1 a / m INDICATES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL INV. = 927.93 INDICATES LIGHT POLE RIM = 937.3 INV. = 927.32 /BUILDING 12 / RIM 929.58 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY - V.= 925.86 0WALLEY & BOE LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 328 SW THIRD STREET - 210 MAIN STREET STOP \ / WILLMAR, MN 56201 COLD SPRING, MN 56320 PH. 320 - 235 -4012 PH. 320-685-5905 FAX 320 - 2214 -9380 FAX 320 - 685 -3056 \ �` ■ RIM = 930.00 / INV. = 917.7 \ \ • \ \ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR \ / UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. \ RIM = 928.82 REG. NO. 42300 DATE: 8 -15 -05 \ INV. = 924.15 BENJAMIN C. O'MALLEY \ NOTE: THIS SURVEY IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE BENEFIT 92 OF THE PARTY TO WHOM IT WAS PREPARED FOR AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE WITHOUT FIRST \ CONTACITNG THE SURVEYOR WHO DEVELOPED AND RIM RIM - 929.75 MADE THIS DRAWING. INV. = 925.22 RIM - 929.73 INV. = 921.37 M. = 915.66 ti U ao O I ;l ,4ssociaLes, /nc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction March 30, 2016 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Landmark IUThe West 3rd Building — Preliminary Plan Review City Project No. ZM5PUD WSB Project No. 02596 -200 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 We have reviewed the project preliminary civil plans received on March 7, 2016, as prepared by Cole Architects and Schultz Engineering, and offer the following comments. 1. A current topographic survey is required showing the following: a. surface features including drainage ways, wetlands, etc b. public utilities including pipe size, material type, depths c. private utilities 2. Dimension the on- street parking bays and driveway access widths. 3. The 3rd Street sidewalk extension to Walnut Street shall be 6 -feet wide. City staff will review the sidewalk alignment in the field with the applicant. 4. City staff will provide information on the existing decorative street lighting and brick pattern boulevard treatments that should extend along 3rd Street and Locust Street to match what exists along Walnut Street. 5. The storm sewer within Locust Street was designed to accommodate runoff from the site based on a 10 -year rainfall event. Provide proposed catch basin inlet capacity calculations. Catch basins should be designed with sufficient capacity to limit ponding to maximum depth of 0.3 feet for a 10 -year rainfall event. 6. It is encouraged to provide infiltration onsite if possible. 7. Consider adding catch basins at the driveway entrances to limit the volume of runoff being directed to the adjacent roadways. K: 102596- 2001AdminlDocsILTR -a Schumann- Landmark77033016.dac Ms. Angela Schumann March 30, 2016 Page 2 8. The elevation datum appears to be inconsistent on the grading plan when comparing the utility elevations with the building finished floor elevation. 9. Identify all emergency overflow routes and elevations for each catch basin on the grading plan. The EOF should be a minimum of 1.5' below the low building opening. 10. Show the existing contours on the grading plan with a dashed, not solid, line type. 11. Proposed elevations for the drainage swale along the east property line shall be provided. 12. Top and bottom retaining wall elevations shall be provided. The retaining wall type and color should also be provided. 13. The storm sewer elevations, pipe sizes and slopes should be shown on the utility plan. 14. Show any irrigation connections to the watermain service and show the irrigation layout on the plans. 15. Provide the location of roof drain outlet locations or connections to the storm sewer. 16. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction. 17. The 6 -inch water service should extend straight into the building from the stub off of Locust Street and not extend within the boulevard area. A tee connection should be provided inside the building with a riser for the sprinkler service. The applicant should verify whether a 2 -inch domestic service is adequate as opposed to a 4 -inch service with meter. 18. The proposed water service shall be installed with a minimum 7.5 feet of cover. 19. Sanitary sewer cleanouts are required at a maximum 70 -foot interval. The footage of the proposed sanitary sewer service shall be noted on the plans. 20. The plans should reference compliance with the City of Monticello General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction. 21. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. 22. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. 23. The plans need to be signed by a licensed professional engineer K. 102596- 2001AdminlDocsILTR -a Schumann- Landmark77033016.dac Ms. Angela Schumann March 30, 2016 Page 3 The civil plans are preliminary and it is my understanding that more detailed construction level plans will be provided after the Planning Commission meeting. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Final plans will need to be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to building permit approval. Please give me a call at 763 - 271 -3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. t. 46&'OPL- Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K. 102596- 2001AdminlDocsILTR -a Schumann- LandmarkII033016.dac I ri 55 F._3 _ PARK - — F -3 L -1 2 L -5 F50 F. 3 F 3 F 1 Lam? F� a F -2 1 � r3 1 .1 P-- F -1 F -1 F -2 F�03 sa F -3 " I =-- - - - - -- ---------- .20 4 - -3. �b L - "� F - FQ2 .F -3 F -1 e L -4 F1� , F -3 f F-1 PUBLIC O.S. L- F -3 Landmark Areas: Corridors: L -1 Public Parking Ramp 1 Broadway Street L -2 River Oriented Shopping 2 Walnut Street L -3 Cargill Site 3 Highway 25 /Pine Street L-4 Community Center Site L -5 Riverfront Park L-6 Future Public Open Space L -7 Permanent Public Open Space L-8 Freeway Retail (B-4 Zoning Standards) Flex Areas: F -1 Shopping Area West of Hwy 25 F -2 Convenience and Services F -3 Transition Figure 22 — Design Guidelines Use Areas 53 R Ut 11[i1DO0Wa F�Rar, P6 Building mass shall have a variety of scale that compliment the heights of anchor tenants and have a two -story appearance through the use of upper windows or taller tower features Storefront glass shall dominate the pedestrian oriented facades Varying rooflines shall be encouraged for skyline interest from highways Large areas of blank wall surface facing street frontages must be interrupted a minimum of 40' for large scale buildings and 20' for small scale buildings with undulations or design features such as pilasters, change in material, streetscape elements such as light fixtures, planter beds or other architectural details Building character shall be urban in nature with visual cues from Cargill "white house ", Community Center contemporary, traditional details from Historic Monticello Broadway Street buildings A variety of storefront designs are encouraged in order to enhance the pedestrian experience Individual buildings should take on unique detailing to be distinct from other neighboring buildings Masonry detailing such as soldier coursing, or patterning shall be encouraged Thematic brand identifications are limited to front entries or signage only - Dual front buildings, corner buildings, and facades that are visible from R.O.W.s should have the same high level of architecture as the main entry facades The use of cornices, decorative light fixtures, and other architectural details are encouraged Colorful and unique canopies, rooflines and accent details are encouraged Small tenant proportions 1,200 SF -5,999 SF � I N FOODS I � I .N 24 F'ODU 1' A,. I a= Large tenant proportions 6,000 SF- 100,000 SF -now MINES 'iPIR1t 4k-0 f � m I IGaii [ ° i ra, Materials shalselected for suitability to the type of buildings and the design in which they are used. Facades should be finished in aesthetically acceptable tones and colors that compliment and do not compete with neighboring buildings - Materials shall be of a durable quality Exterior wall treatments such as brick, natural stone, decorative concrete block, stucco and or architectural metal panels are encouraged - All wood treatment shall be painted or stained for weatherproofing - A minimum of 25% of the facades shall be treated with finished masonry building material or glass Secondary materials such as decorative concrete block, precast panels, EIFS, or standing seam metal shall be allowed on the remaining 75% Transparent glass shall be used at the majority of street level windows. Spandrel glass is acceptable for minor in -fill usage. Mirror glass is not allowed Masonry walls shall have decorative variation in color, texture, or pattern Rear of buildings not visible from public shall be consistent in color to the front facades The natural brick and copper tones of the community center should give visual cues to the appropriate color palette selec r Example of combination of acceptable materials z' Community Center j AV r During the planning process, the potential for allowing commercial activity to extend easterly out of the Downtown along Broadway was discussed. The Comprehensive Plan consciously defines Cedar Street as the eastern edge of Downtown for two basic reasons: (1) Downtown should be successful and sustainable before new areas of competition are created; and (2) The Comprehensive Plan seeks to maintain and enhance the integrity of residential neighborhoods east of Downtown. More than any other land use category, Downtown has strong connections to other parts of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore the City has adopted the Embracing Downtown Plan as its guiding planning document for the Downtown. The following parts of the Comprehensive Plan also address community desires and plans for the Downtown area: ► The Land Use chapter contains a specific focus area on Downtown. The focus area contains a more detailed discussion of the issues facing the Downtown and potential public actions needed to address these issues. ► The operation of the street system is a critical factor for the future of Downtown. The Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Transportation chapter of the Embracing Downtown Plan influence the ability of residents to travel to Downtown and the options for mitigating the impacts of traffic on Highway 25 and other Downtown streets. ► The Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan provides for parks in the Downtown and the trail systems that allow people to reach Downtown on foot or bicycle. ► The Economic Development chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Financial Implementation chapter of the Embracing Downtown Plan lay the foundation for public actions and investments that will be needed to achieve the desired outcomes. Policies /Guiding Principles - Downtown 1. Downtown is a special and unique part of Monticello. It merits particular attention in the Comprehensive Plan and in future efforts to achieve community plans and objectives. 2. Downtown is intended to be an inter - connected and supportive collection of land uses. The primary function of Downtown is as a commercial district. Other land uses should support and enhance the overall objectives for Downtown. 3. The City will build on core assets of greater Downtown Monticello as identified in the Embracing Downtown Plan. 4. A shared vision among property owners, business owners and the City is the foundation for effective team work and long term success. 5. A shared understanding of realistic market potential is the foundation for design and generation of a healthy business mix. 6. A safe, attractive human scale environment and entrepreneurial businesses that actively emphasize personal customer service will differentiate Downtown from other shopping districts. 7. Property values can be enhanced if property owners and the City share a vision for Downtown and actively seek to cultivate a safe, appealing environment and attractive business mix. 8. Housing in the Downtown can facilitate necessary redevelopment and bring potential customers directly into the area. Housing may be free- standing or in shared buildings with street level commercial uses. 9. Downtown is the civic center of Monticello. To the degree possible, unique public facilities (such as the Community Center, the Library and the Post Office) should be located in the Downtown area as a means to bring people into the Downtown. 10. Downtown should emphasize connections with the Mississippi River that are accessible by the public. 11. Downtown should be a pedestrian- oriented place in a manner that cannot be matched by other commercial districts. 12. Downtown should have an adequate supply of free parking for customers distributed throughout the area. 13. The City and business community must work actively with MnDOT to ensure safe local access to business districts. 3 -14 1 Land Use City of Monticello During the planning process, the potential for allowing commercial activity to extend easterly out of the Downtown along Broadway was discussed. The Comprehensive Plan consciously defines Cedar Street as the eastern edge of Downtown for two basic reasons: (1) Downtown should be successful and sustainable before new areas of competition are created; and (2) The Comprehensive Plan seeks to maintain and enhance the integrity of residential neighborhoods east of Downtown. More than any other land use category, Downtown has strong connections to other parts of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore the City has adopted the Embracing Downtown Plan as its guiding planning document for the Downtown. The following parts of the Comprehensive Plan also address community desires and plans for the Downtown area: ► The Land Use chapter contains a specific focus area on Downtown. The focus area contains a more detailed discussion of the issues facing the Downtown and potential public actions needed to address these issues. ► The operation of the street system is a critical factor for the future of Downtown. The Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Transportation chapter of the Embracing Downtown Plan influence the ability of residents to travel to Downtown and the options for mitigating the impacts of traffic on Highway 25 and other Downtown streets. ► The Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan provides for parks in the Downtown and the trail systems that allow people to reach Downtown on foot or bicycle. ► The Economic Development chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Financial Implementation chapter of the Embracing Downtown Plan lay the foundation for public actions and investments that will be needed to achieve the desired outcomes. Policies /Guiding Principles - Downtown 1. Downtown is a special and unique part of Monticello. It merits particular attention in the Comprehensive Plan and in future efforts to achieve community plans and objectives. 2. Downtown is intended to be an inter - connected and supportive collection of land uses. The primary function of Downtown is as a commercial district. Other land uses should support and enhance the overall objectives for Downtown. 3. The City will build on core assets of greater Downtown Monticello as identified in the Embracing Downtown Plan. 4. A shared vision among property owners, business owners and the City is the foundation for effective team work and long term success. 5. A shared understanding of realistic market potential is the foundation for design and generation of a healthy business mix. 6. A safe, attractive human scale environment and entrepreneurial businesses that actively emphasize personal customer service will differentiate Downtown from other shopping districts. 7. Property values can be enhanced if property owners and the City share a vision for Downtown and actively seek to cultivate a safe, appealing environment and attractive business mix. 8. Housing in the Downtown can facilitate necessary redevelopment and bring potential customers directly into the area. Housing may be free- standing or in shared buildings with street level commercial uses. 9. Downtown is the civic center of Monticello. To the degree possible, unique public facilities (such as the Community Center, the Library and the Post Office) should be located in the Downtown area as a means to bring people into the Downtown. 10. Downtown should emphasize connections with the Mississippi River that are accessible by the public. 11. Downtown should be a pedestrian- oriented place in a manner that cannot be matched by other commercial districts. 12. Downtown should have an adequate supply of free parking for customers distributed throughout the area. 13. The City and business community must work actively with MnDOT to ensure safe local access to business districts. 3 -14 1 Land Use City of Monticello ITEM 2.C. Masters5thAvenue: Landmark Square II Rezoning to Planned Unit Development District Monticello Planning Commission April 5, 2016 ti r 4 PLI SITE • • • � F- w W Ir F- V) z z m 09,91 • Puwlr;, Par" STH STREST WALHUT STREET Pomp Pica; 4 i CIA 1; NINO Ui 41 4U Ip CWyaniEnce SL PW,9 Q U: YSTREET 4TI4 STREET 1,14 SJIFLIEV :dmoracing downtown tt" dv Puwlr;, Par" STH STREST WALHUT STREET Pomp Pica; 4 i CIA 1; NINO Ui 41 4U Ip CWyaniEnce SL PW,9 Q U: YSTREET 4TI4 STREET 1,14 SJIFLIEV m - PARK F'3 L5 L- F- 1 llowntown F -3 F`3 Istrict. '.,.hoppi*ng Area West of Hwy 25 - -- L -4 F F.3 0 URLI t I-- En n C-L_ THIRD STREET WEST * I. fj +TIK L{iCUr t THIRD 5T§ME7 rf N THE UGHTINU' .NUT STREET LTI K AMC *4 TWE .CTION wND WAUIUT ST. S. WALK AND FAvardS NUT STiRLtT. South Elevation (Facing 3rd Street) West Elevation (Facing Locust Street North Elevation (Facing Landmark I and Alley) East Elevation (Facing Olson State Farm) Garage Elevation facing parking lot PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district is to provide greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and non - residential areas in order to maximize public values and achieve more creative development outcomes while remaining economically viable and marketable. This is achieved by undertaking a process that results in a development outcome exceeding that which is typically achievable through the conventional zoning district. The City reserves the right to deny the PUD rezoning and direct the developer to re -apply under the standard applicable zoning district. Current Baseline Zoning - CCD Subdistrict F -1 • Commercial on Ground Floor • Residential allowed on upper floors • Ground floor residential by CCD Residential Overlay • Maximum residential density under any zoning is 25 units per acre • On. 76 acre site, maximum unit count would be 18 units • Parking requirements in CCD Residential: 1.5 spaces per unit • Half of parking to be covered Development Proposal • 23 Residential Units v. 18 units under other zoning • 16 covered parking in detached garage buildings • 18 open parking stalls on site • 8 angled on- street parking stalls on 3rd Street • 3 -4 existing on- street parallel spaces on Locust Street • Approximately 35% brick, stone, and glass exterior on principal building • Unit size averaging 870 square feet per unit • 25% lot coverage; 18% green space Y 1= qlQP E ntl -al Overlay ItS) _Or CPU k than V8 du) 1 L11 PQDA C,On -5ider - 1Jrrerrt project. O.R,. require changes to meet Embrzc.ing Down town oals_ Allo%v Ixl. D, but with significant ch-a nges more consistent with- urban defijgn (rviop'v unit, attached par king;, em) N 0 Act =on: Deny PUD and reran Current Onnfl Residential OVeFlay Red esign to. mammurn 18 unit! Current project (23 du); Ide-mi arrbitectural and site plan conditions for I }U D approval_ Planned Unit Development • Staff has raised the issue of PUD design and density • Do detached garages fit in an urban setting? • Is the density high enough? • Should PUD be used only to support a more intensive development? • The Planning Commission should use PUD to achieve the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, not merely to flex zoning standards. Alternative Actions • Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2016 - 006 recommending approval of the Rezoning from CCD, F -1, to PUD District, and Development Stage PUD based on the findings in said resolution, and contingent on compliance with the conditions listed in Exhibit Z. • Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2016 - 006, recommending denial, recommending that the applicant instead pursue rezoning to CCD - Residential Overlay, based on findings identified at the public hearing. 0 • Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2016 - 006, recommending instead that the current zoning (CCD, F -1) is retained and that ground floor residential is not permitted on the subject property, based on findings identified at the public hearing. 0 • Motion to table action on Resolution No. 2016 - 006, pending submission of additional material from the applicant, public, and /or staff. Staff Recommendation • Is the proposed project, with the conditions considered and identified by staff and the Commission, consistent with the goals and objectives of the Embracing Downtown Monticello planning documents, as well as the purpose and requirements of Planned Unit Development zoning? • If so, Alternative 1 is appropriate: • (Approval as proposed, but with Exhibit Z Conditions). This Alternative is Resolution 2016- Exhibit Z (Conditions of Approval) 1. Redesign of the detached garage buildings to provide the following: a. Flat- roofed design b. Variable roof heights c. Materials reflective of those on the principal building d. Variable wall facades facing adjoining properties 2. Redesign of building entrance points to incorporate flat - roofed design. 3. Deck materials shall be consistent with Embracing Downtown Guidelines. 4. Provision of on- street parking along 3rd Street as noted on approved site plan. 5. Add tree planting to sidewalk along 3rd Street similar to proposed planting on Locust Street. 6. Extend sidewalk from project to Walnut Street along 3rd Street. 7. Extend sidewalk along Locust Street to meet existing sidewalk to north Exhibit Z (Conditions of Approval), cont'd 8. Utilize sidewalk materials consistent with Walnut Streetscape improvements. 9. Ensure lapped siding is "LP ", cement board, or better, with no wood, vinyl or aluminum. 10. Revise trash enclosure to provide a visual barrier at the access point from the parking lot. 11. Provide lighting plans that meet the zoning ordinance requirements, and utilize materials and elements consistent with Walnut Streetscape. 12. Reduce wall sign size to 32 square feet, consistent with ordinance allowances. 13. Provide a current topographic survey and prepare grading, drainage, and utility plans consistent with the requirements and comments from the City Engineer in the Engineer's letter dated March 30th, 2016. 14. Other comments of the Planning Commission and Staff provided at the Public Hearing CITY OF A COUNCIL CONNECTION MARCH, 2016 9]►V ` +I Transactions March 2016, the DMV processed 8,151 transactions 73 less than March 2015. DMV year - to date revenue is $144,068.35 a decrease of $4,482.66 or ( -3 %) over the same period last year. Please see the following schedules and graphs for more detail. DMV RECAP COMPARISON FOR 2011 -2016 MONTH/ YEAR Monthly Transaction Count Monthly TOTAL$ COLLECTED Monthly DMV Revenue Monthly Transaction Count Change over Prior Year Monthly DMV Revenue Change over Prior Year Jan -11 4,858 $ 1,055,111.55 $ 21,371.58 Year -to -date Accumlative Change Jan -12 5,522 $ 1,278,495.17 $ 37,534.44 664 $ 16,162.86 Jan -13 5,633 $ 1,320,990.85 $ 39,764.77 111 $ 2,230.33 Jan -14 5,866 $ 1,446,610.41 $ 40,164.33 233 $ 399.56 Jan -15 6,408 $ 1,638,758.42 $ 46,375.32 542 $ 6,210.99 Jan -16 6,661 $ 1,552,700.05 $ 44,032.68 253 $ (2,342.64) Feb -11 4,982 $ 1,032,897.31 $ 27,624.07 $ 6,210.99 15.5% Feb -12 5,652 $ 1,173,015.71 $ 42,748.36 670 $ 15,124.29 Feb -13 5,500 $ 1,186,703.62 $ 40,770.21 (152) $ (1,978.15) Feb -14 5,817 $ 1,248,557.39 $ 38,910.70 317 $ (1,859.51) Feb -15 6,103 $ 1,552,724.23 $ 44,029.96 286 $ 5,119.26 Feb -16 7,259 $ 1,581,346.40 $ 48,448.86 1,156 $ 4,418.90 Mar -11 6,097 $ 1,210,709.86 $ 33,573.49 -1.8% 11,683 Mar -12 6,802 $ 1,496,197.56 $ 50,458.91 705 $ 16,885.42 Mar -13 5,529 $ 1,287,220.07 $ 36,276.31 (1,273) $ (14,182.60) Mar -14 6,587 $ 1,508,292.16 $ 46,503.21 1,058 $ 10,226.90 Mar -16 8,224 $ 1,834,522.51 $ 58,145.73 1,637 $ 11,642.52 Mar -15 8,151 $ 1,950,443.29 $ 51,586.81 (73) $ (6,558.92) Apr -11 5,961 $ 1,118,188.94 $ 32,097.64 16,662 (1,314) Apr -12 5,528 $ 1,311,367.72 $ 44,250.68 (433) $ 12,153.04 Apr -13 6,207 $ 1,410,940.74 $ 44,208.19 679 $ (42.49) Apr -14 6,769 $ 1,545,140.80 $ 49,621.43 562 $ 5,413.24 Apr -15 7,138 $ 1,796,965.46 $ 50,202.02 369 $ 580.59 Apr -16 - $ - $ - - -- $ - May -11 4,851 $ 1,104,176.43 $ 33,919.73 1,606 7.3% May -12 5,9741 $ 1,177,228.70 $ 37,751.18 1,123 $ 3,831.45 May -13 6,378 $ 1,416,908.77 $ 48,814.48 404 $ 11,063.30 May -14 6,705 $ 1,570,491.19 $ 47,105.14 327 $ (1,709.34) May -15 5,789 $ 1,481,427.96 $ 45,042.09 (916) $ (2,063.05) May -16 - $ - $ - - -- $ - Jun -11 5,788 $ 1,324,978.77 $ 32,731.90 10.2% $ Jun -12 5,265 $ 1,234,600.93 $ 43,378.15 (523) $ 10,646.25 Jun -13 5,283 $ 1,265,153.04 $ 37,903.81 18 $ (5,474.34) Jun -14 5,720 $ 1,460,919.68 $ 43,703.24 437 $ 5,799.43 Jun -15 6,615 $ 1,888,007.57 $ 47,720.84 895 $ 4,017.60 Jun -16 - $ - $ - - -- $ - Jul -11 3,783 $ 1,024,904.55 $ 27,597.23 $ 247,737.77 Jul -12 5,169 $ 1,391,660.81 $ 38,589.10 1,386 $ 10,991.87 Jul -13 4,975 $ 1,590,494.35 $ 40,822.05 (194) $ 2,232.95 Jul -14 5,848 $ 1,949,275.49 $ 44,599.75 873 $ 3,777.70 Jul -15 5,972 $ 1,875,032.63 $ 46,171.09 124 $ 1,571.34 Jul -16 - $ - $ - - -- $ - Aug -11 5,415 $ 1,568,535.81 $ 38,376.01 288,559.82 $ (6,151.00) Aug -12 5,043 $ 1,742,588.88 $ 39,507.10 (372) $ 1,131.09 Aug -13 4,909 $ 1,594,192.26 $ 38,529.59 (134) $ (977.51) Aug -14 5,514 $ 1,744,064.13 $ 43,820.89 605 $ 5,291.30 Aug -15 5,663 $ 1,750,523.66 $ 42,361.98 149 $ (1,458.91) Aug -16 - $ - $ - - -- $ - Sep -11 4,733 $ 1,607,007.19 $ 33,657.59 $ (7,128.51) -2.1% Sep -12 3,862 $ 1,226,543.67 $ 31,889.50 (871) $ (1,768.09) Sep -13 4,962 $ 1,593,901.77 $ 36,622.06 1,100 $ 4,732.56 Sep -14 4,554 $ 1,521,340.40 $ 35,071.79 (408) $ (1,550.27) Sep -15 5,337 $ 1,926,111.81 $ 40,759.00 783 $ 5,687.21 Sep -16 - $ - $ - - -- $ - Oct -11 4,032 $ 1,045,550.78 $ 29,205.57 -0.7% 49,376 Oct -12 4,580 $ 1,217,258.98 $ 36,491.03 548 $ 7,285.46 Oct -13 4,375 $ 1,306,661.53 $ 32,969.10 (205) $ (3,521.93) Oct -14 4,879 $ 1,745,519.07 $ 38,839.96 504 $ 5,870.86 Oct -15 4,888 $ 1,615,667.44 $ 37,245.25 9 $ (1,594.71) Oct -16 - $ - $ - - -- $ - Nov -11 3,752 $ 1,182,584.63 $ 29,130.88 53,751 354 Nov -12 3,628 $ 1,100,487.25 $ 29,241.07 (124) $ 110.19 Nov -13 3,696 $ 1,062,780.01 $ 27,357.25 68 $ (1,883.82) Nov -14 4,205 $ 1,213,032.90 $ 33,506.13 509 $ 6,148.88 Nov -15 4,350 $ 1,373,939.02 $ 32,456.61 145 $ (1,049.52) Nov -16 - $ - $ - - -- $ - Dec -11 4,005 $ 1,093,117.04 $ 25,931.39 422 0.7% Dec -12 5,974 $ 1,026,924.27 $ 27,108.50 1,969 $ 1,177.11 Dec -13 4,973 $ 1,242,071.18 $ 32,139.83 (1,001) $ 5,031.33 Dec -14 4,998 $ 1,549,981.22 $ 35,646.77 25 $ 3,506.94 Dec -15 5,648 $ 1,541,329.76 $ 40,608.08 650 $ 4,961.31 Dec -16 - $ - $ - - -- $ - 2011TOTAL 58,257 $ 14,367,762.86 $ 365,217.08 -0.9% $ 2012TOTAL 62,999 $ 15,376,369.65 $ 458,948.02 41742 $ 93,730.94 2013 TOTAL 62,420 $ 16,278,018.19 $ 456,177.65 (579) $ (2,770.37) 2014 TOTAL 67,462 $ 18,503,224.84 $ 497,493.34 5,042 $ 41,315.69 2015 TOTAL 72,135 $ 20,275,010.47 $ 531,117.97 4,673 $ 33,624.63 2016 TOTAL 22,071 $ 5,084,489.74 $ 144,068.35 #VALUE! $ (4,482.66) March 125,998 4,742 124,840 (579) Transactions Transactions DMV Revenue DMV Revenue - Accumlative Transactions Accumlative Accumlative Year -to -date Accumlative Change Change % Year -to -date Change Change $ 21,371.58 4,858 $ 37,534.44 $ 16,162.86 75.6% 5,522 664 13.7% $ 39,764.77 $ 2,230.33 5.9% 5,633 111 2.0% $ 40,164.33 $ 399.56 1.0% 5,866 233 4.1% $ 46,375.32 $ 6,210.99 15.5% 6,408 542 9.2% $ 44,032.68 $ (2,342.64) -5.1% 6,661 253 3.9% $ 48,995.65 9,840 $ 80,282.80 $ 31,287.15 63.9% 11,174 1,334 13.6% $ 80,534.98 $ 252.18 0.3% 11,133 (41) -0.4% $ 79,075.03 $ (1,459.95) -1.8% 11,683 550 4.9% $ 90,405.28 $ 11,330.25 14.3% 12,511 828 7.1% $ 92,481.54 $ 2,076.26 2.3% 13,920 1,409 11.3% $ 82,569.14 15,937 $ 130,741.71 $ 48,172.57 58.3% 17,976 2,039 12.8% $ 116,811.29 $ (13,930.42) -10.7% 16,662 (1,314) -7.3% $ 125,578.24 $ 8,766.95 7.5% 18,270 1,608 9.7% $ 148,551.01 $ 12,967.25 18.3% 20,735 2,465 13.5% $ 144,068.35 $ (4,482.66) -3.0% 22,071 1,336 6.4% $ 114,666.78 21,898 $ 174,992.39 $ 60,325.61 52.6% 23,504 1,606 7.3% $ 161,019.48 $ (13,972.91) -8.0% 22,869 (635) -2.7% $ 175,199.67 $ 14,180.19 8.8% 25,039 2,170 9.5% $ 198,753.03 $ 13,336.25 13.4% 27,873 2,834 11.3% $ --- 148,586.51 --- --- --- 26,749 --- - -- $ 212,743.57 $ 64,157.06 43.2% 29,478 2,729 10.2% $ 209,833.96 $ (2,909.61) -1.4% 29,247 (231) -0.8% $ 222,304.81 $ 12,470.85 5.9% 31,744 2,497 8.5% $ 243,795.12 $ 21,490.31 9.7% 33,662 1,918 6.0% $ --- 181,318.41 -- --- -- 32,537 -- --- $ 256,121.72 $ 74,803.31 41.3% 34,743 2,206 6.8% $ 247,737.77 $ (8,383.95) -3.3% 34,530 (213) -0.6% $ 266,008.05 $ 18,270.28 7.4% 37,464 2,934 8.5% $ 291,515.96 $ 25,507.91 9.6% 40,277 2,813 7.5% $ -- 208,915.64 -- -- --- 36,320 --- -- $ 294,710.82 $ 85,795.18 41.1% 39,912 3,592 9.9% $ 288,559.82 $ (6,151.00) -2.1% 39,505 (407) -1.0% $ 310,607.80 $ 22,047.98 7.6% 43,312 3,807 9.6% $ 337,687.05 $ 27,079.25 8.7% 46,249 2,937 6.8% $ --- 247,291.65 --- --- --- 41,735 --- --- $ 334,217.92 $ 86,926.27 35.2% 44,955 3,220 7.7% $ 327,089.41 $ (7,128.51) -2.1% 44,414 (541) -1.2% $ 354,428.69 $ 27,339.28 8.4% 48,826 4,412 9.9% $ 380,049.03 $ 25,620.34 7.2% 51,912 3,086 6.3% $ 280,949.24 46,468 $ 366,107.42 $ 85,158.18 30.3% 48,817 2,349 5.1% $ 363,711.47 $ (2,395.95) -0.7% 49,376 559 1.1% $ 389,500.48 $ 25,789.01 7.1% 53,380 4,004 8.1% $ 420,808.03 $ 31,307.55 8.0% 57,249 3,869 7.2% $ --- 310,154.81 -- --- --- 50,500 --- --- $ 402,598.45 $ 92,443.64 29.8% 53,397 2,897 5.7% $ 396,680.57 $ (5,917.88) -1.5% 53,751 354 0.7% $ 428,340.44 $ 31,659.87 8.0% 58,259 4,508 8.4% $ 458,053.28 $ 29,712.84 6.9% 62,137 3,878 6.7% $ --- 339,285.69 --- --- --- 54,252 --- --- $ 431,839.52 $ 92,553.83 27.3% 57,025 2,773 5.1% $ 424,037.82 $ (7,801.70) -1.8% 57,447 422 0.7% $ 461,846.57 $ 37,808.75 8.9% 62,464 5,017 8.7% $ 490,509.89 $ 28,663.32 6.2% 66,487 4,023 6.4% $ --- 365,217.08 --- - -- --- 58,257 --- --- $ 458,948.02 $ 93,730.94 25.7% 62,999 4,742 8.1% $ 456,177.65 $ (2,770.37) -0.6% 62,420 (579) -0.9% $ 497,493.34 $ 41,315.69 9.1% 67,462 5,042 8.1% $ 531,117.97 --- $ 33,624.63 --- 6.8% --- 72,135 --- 4,673 -- 6.9% -- 125,998 4,742 124,840 (579) -0.5% 134,924 10,084 8.1% 144,270 9,346 6.9% #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! $160,000 $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison Mar 2011 Mar 2012 Mar 2013 Mar 2014 Mar 2015 Mar 2016 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 25,000 22,071 20,735 20,000 8,270 15,937 16,662 15,000 10,000 5,000 Mar 2011 Mar 2012 Mar 2013 Mar 2014 Mar 2015 Mar 2016 1 CITY OF r_ Monti�do COUNCIL CONNECTION APRIL 25, 2016 FIBERNET MONTICELLO FiberNet Statistics Attached are the statistics for residents, businesses, and total number of subscribers from the April billing cycle. There was a decline in April following a relatively slow month of installs in March 2016; however, the rate of installs has increased this month. By mid -April FiberNet had surpassed the total number of installs from the previous month. FiberNet staff are also utilizing inserts in the upcoming utility bills and information in the spring /summer city newsletter to spread the word to residents about the great service. This month staff has also included the latest financial data for council's review. Assistance to the Water Department Three FiberNet technicians were recently trained and have begun assisting the water department with the installation of the Neptune radio readers attached to the water meters. Public Works' administrative staff was given access to the FiberNet calendar so they can schedule water meter installs during times free of FiberNet installs. Residential & Business Subscribers Service Jan Feb Mar Apr May un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Phone Only 32 31 31 31 10 10 10 Internet Only 664 678 693 700 38 39 41 Television Only 74 72 72 70 1 1 1 Phone & Internet 164 163 161 158 70 66 64 Phone & Television 44 43 43 43 1 2 2 Internet & Television 318 309 298 292 3 3 3 Triple Play 278 277 271 268 14 14 14 Total Subscribers 1574 1573 1569 1562 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Phone 518 514 506 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internet 1424 1427 1423 1418 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Television 1 714 1 701 1 684 1 673 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Business Subscribers Jan Feb Service Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Phone Only 10 10 10 10 Internet Only 627 640 Internet Only 37 38 39 41 Television Only 73 71 Television Only 1 1 1 1 Phone & Internet 94 93 Phone & Internet 70 70 66 64 Phone & Television 43 42 Phone & Television 1 1 2 2 Internet & Television 315 306 Internet & Television 3 3 3 3 Triple Play 263 263 Triple Play 15 14 14 14 Total Subscribers 1437 1436 Total Subscribers 137 137 13S 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Phone 96 95 92 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internet 125 125 122 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Television 20 19 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential Subscribers Service Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Phone Only 22 21 21 21 Internet Only 627 640 654 659 Television Only 73 71 71 69 Phone & Internet 94 93 95 94 Phone & Television 43 42 41 41 Internet & Television 315 306 295 289 Triple Play 263 263 257 254 Total Subscribers 1437 1436 1434 1427 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Phone 422 419 414 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internet 1299 1302 1301 1296 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Television 694 682 664 653 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fiber Net 2016 Schedule of Revenue and Expenses (Modified Accrual Basis - No Depreciation) 3/31/2016 Account Number Description Original Amended Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTD Ytd% Comments Budget Budget REVENUE General & Administration 18,057 12,000 852 1,810 17,873 1,176 1,490 656 - 00000 - 341180 PEG Access Fee $ 7,435 $ 7,435 $ 592 $ 569 $ 558 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,719 23.1% 656 - 00000 - 341190 USF Fee 8,083 8,083 672 663 634 1,968 24.3% 656 - 00000 - 362920 Services - Misc 15,776 15,776 1,321 1,321 1,321 3,963 25.1% 656 - 00000 - 362990 Other Miscellaneous Revenue 2,001 2,001 15 1,535 5 1,554 77.7% 656 - 00000 - 380510 Television Services 619,082 619,082 45,996 48,729 47,450 142,175 23.0% 656 - 00000 - 380520 Internet Services 659,011 659,011 55,770 55,639 55,691 167,100 25.4% 656 - 00000 - 380522 Equipment Rental /Purchase 128,502 128,502 12,421 13,115 12,181 37,718 29.4% 656 - 00000 - 380530 Phone Services 267,617 267,617 24,424 24,177 23,491 72,093 26.9% 656 - 00000 - 380531 Long Distance - - 17 2,934 2,930 5,863 - -- 656- 00000 - 380540 CABS Revenue 6,000 6,000 - - 1,418 1,418 23.6% 656 - 00000 - 380542 Late Fees 16,260 16,260 1,390 1,505 1,265 4,160 25.6% 656 - 00000 - 380545 Discounts Offered - Taxable (26,213) (26,213) (2,113) (2,027) (1,949) (6,090) 23.2% 656 - 00000 - 380546 Discounts Offered -Non Taxable (42,107) (42,107) (3,252) (3,164) (3,059) (9,475) 22.5% 656 - 00000 - 380557 Miscellaneous Charges 27,520 27,520 1,709 1,349 1,174 4,232 15.4% 656 - 00000 - 380558 Misc Charges -Non Taxable 1,483 1,483 (3) 138 21 157 10.6% 656 - 49870 - 431970 OPERATING REVENUE Totals: 1,690,450 1,690,450 138,942 146,482 143,130 428,554 25.4% Dept 49870 General & Administration 18,057 12,000 852 1,810 17,873 1,176 1,490 656 - 49870 - 410100 Salaries Full -Time Reg 184,238 184,238 11,622 10,022 10,461 32,105 17.4% 656 - 49870 - 410200 Salaries Full -Time OT 600 600 36 18 26 81 13.5% 656 - 49870 - 410300 Salaries Part -Time Reg 18,000 18,000 1,238 1,316 1,430 3,985 22.1% 656 - 49870 - 410310 Salaries Part -Time. OT - - - - - - - -- 656- 49870 - 410400 Salaries Temporary -Reg - - - - - - - -- 656- 49870 - 412100 Pera Contributions 15,213 15,213 727 852 894 2,473 16.3% 656 - 49870 - 412200 Fica Contributions 15,517 15,517 710 828 869 2,408 15.5% 656 - 49870 - 413100 Health Insurance Contributions 56,421 56,421 3,663 3,663 3,788 11,115 19.7% 656 - 49870 - 413300 Life Insurance Contributions 300 300 17 25 25 68 22.5% 656 - 49870 - 413400 Disability Ins Contributions 600 600 24 35 35 95 15.8% 656 - 49870 - 415100 Workers Comp 644 644 - - - - 0.0% 656 - 49870 - 421990 Gen Operating Supplies 17,088 17,088 3,836 - 3,836 22.4% 656 - 49870 - 430400 Legal Fees 9,600 9,600 371 375 746 7.8% 656 - 49870 - 430700 Management Services (GM) - - - - - - -- 656- 49870 - 431800 Professional Services - Billings 26,400 26,400 2,059 2,000 2,000 6,060 23.0% 656 - 49870 - 431970 Regulatory Professional Svcs 9,600 9,600 - - 442 442 4.6% 656 - 49870 - 431990 Miscellaneous Prof Services 24,000 24,000 296 6,608 3,577 10,481 43.7% 656 - 49870 - 432100 Telephone /Internet 1,800 1,800 - - 8 8 0.5% 656 - 49870 - 432150 Internal IT Services 26,929 26,929 2,244 2,244 2,244 6,732 25.0% 656 - 49870 - 432200 Mail & Delivery Services 8,400 8,400 567 575 560 1,702 20.3% 656 - 49870 - 432500 Cable /Network Services 8,600 8,600 - - 1,835 1,835 21.3% 656 - 49870 - 433200 Training /Conferences 1,200 1,200 - - 0.0% 656 - 49870 - 434600 Marketing 1,800 1,800 - - 0.0% 656 - 49870 - 436100 LPV Insurance 9,165 9,165 5,346 - 5,346 58.3% 656 - 49870 - 440100 Repair and Maint - Buildings 2,400 2,400 - 190 - 190 7.9% 656 - 49870 - 441200 Building /Room Rental 16,980 16,980 1,415 1,415 1,415 4,245 25.0% 656 - 49870 - 443200 Write Offs 21,600 21,600 1,291 (186) 1,985 3,090 14.3% 656 - 49870 - 443300 Dues Membership and Subscrip 1,300 1,300 - 100 - 100 7.7% 656 - 49870 - 443700 Licenses And Permits 1,625 1,625 80 - 102 182 11.2% 656 - 49870 - 443980 Bank Charges 12,000 12,000 803 959 39 1,801 15.0% 656 - 49870 - 443990 Miscellaneous Other Exp 6,000 6,000 5 (3) 34 35 0.6% 656 -49870 EXPENSE Totals: 498,020 498,020 32,145 34,869 32,146 99,160 19.9% Dept 49870 656 - 49877 - 410100 656 - 49877 - 410200 656 - 49877 - 410300 656 - 49877 - 410310 656 - 49877 - 410400 656 - 49877 - 412100 Field Operations Salaries Full -Time Reg 226,313 Salaries Full -Time OT 12,000 Salaries Part -Time Reg - Salaries Part -Time OT Salaries Other -Reg - Pera Contributions 17,873 226,313 22,903 18,057 12,000 852 1,810 17,873 1,176 1,490 18,066 59,026 26.1% 1,466 4,127 34.4% 1,465 4,131 23.1% Dept 49879 Cost of Goods Sold Original Amended SUMMARY Description BuOdget Account Number Description 68,280 68,280 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTD Ytd% Comments 656 - 49879 - 430920 Video - Technical Services Budget Budget 48,865 49,394 48,382 146,641 22.2% 656 - 49877 - 412200 Fica Contributions 18,231 18,231 1,163 1,471 1,442 4,076 22.4% 656 - 49877 - 412300 Medicare Contributions - - - - - - - -- 656- 49877 - 413100 Health Insurance Contributions 66,539 66,539 5,440 5,440 5,590 16,470 24.8% 656 - 49877 - 413300 Life Insurance Contributions 600 600 23 37 37 98 16.3% 656 - 49877 - 413400 Disability Ins Contributions 1,200 1,200 36 57 57 150 12.5% 656 - 49877 - 414200 UC Benefit Payments - - - - - - - -- 656- 49877 - 415100 Work Comp Ins Premiums 5,896 5,896 4,384 4,384 74.4% 656 - 49877 - 421110 Clothing Supplies 1,800 1,800 - - - - 0.0% 656 - 49877 - 421200 Motor Fuels 3,600 3,600 25 89 80 195 5.4% 656 - 49877 - 421800 Fiber /Video /Phone Supplies 73,000 73,000 - 7,523 - 7,523 10.3% 656 - 49877 - 421990 Gen Operating Supplies 30,000 30,000 1,152 2,790 955 4,897 16.3% 656 - 49877 - 422500 Landscaping Materials - - - - - - - -- 656- 49877 - 422990 Misc Repair and Maint Supplies - - - -- 656- 49877 - 424100 Small Tools ($500 - $9999) 6,000 6,000 - - - - 0.0% 656 - 49877 - 431900 Maintenance & Support Services (1) 108,000 108,000 8,970 26,900 4,230 40,100 37.1% 656 - 49877 - 431990 Miscellaneous Prof Services 12,000 12,000 - 658 658 1,317 11.0% 656 - 49877 - 432770 Gopher State Locates 1,800 1,800 77 24 101 5.6% 656 - 49877 - 433100 Travel Expense - - - - - - -- 656- 49877 - 433200 Training /Conferences - - - - - - - -- 656- 49877 - 438100 Electric 24,000 24,000 1,866 1,578 2,028 5,471 22.8% 656 - 49877 - 438200 Water /Sewer 900 900 - - - - 0.0% 656 - 49877 - 438400 Refuse /Recycling Services 1,200 1,200 - 109 109 9.1% 656 - 49877 - 440100 R &M- Buildings /Systems 24,000 24,000 1,481 - 1,481 6.2% 656 - 49877 - 440440 R &M -Mach & Equip 4,000 4,000 - - 0.0% 656 - 49877 - 440500 R &M- Vehicles 4,000 4,000 0.0% 656 - 49877 - 443990 Miscellaneous Other Exp 6,000 6,000 0.0% 656 - 49877 - 458010 Other Equipment - - - -- 656 -49877 EXPENSE Totals: 648,952 648,952 47,990 69,460 36,207 153,657 23.7% Dept 49879 Cost of Goods Sold Amended SUMMARY Description BuOdget 656 - 49879 - 430910 Voice - Technical Services 68,280 68,280 5,512 4,994 6,030 16,536 24.2% 656 - 49879 - 430920 Video - Technical Services 661,260 661,260 48,865 49,394 48,382 146,641 22.2% 656 - 49879 - 430930 Data - Technical Services 159,300 159,300 17,819 17,870 17,870 53,559 33.6% 656 - 49879 - 443720 Video - Licenses and Permits - - - 67 - 67 350,000 29,167 656 -49879 EXPENSE Totals: 888,840 888,840 72,196 72,324 72,282 216,803 24.4% 31,663 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ OPERATING EXPENSE Totals: 2,035,812 2,035,812 152,331 176,653 140,635 469,619 23.1% OPERATING (LOSS) $ (345,362) $ (345,362) $ (13,390) $ (30,171) $ 2,496 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (41,065) 11.9% OPERATING - average monthly (loss) Notes: (1) Lump sum (i.e. annual, semi - annual, etc.) service payments will be re- distributed by months covered as the year progresses (about remaining $22,500/9 or $2,500 monthly). (13,688) - -- Months Year % 3 12 25.0% Amended SUMMARY Description BuOdget Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTD Ytd% OPERATING (LOSS) $ (345,362) $ (345,362) $ (13,390) $ (30,171) $ 2,496 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (41,065) 11.9% NONOPERATING (REV) /EXP: Investment Earnings 656- 00000 - 362400 Sale of City Property - - - - - - - -- 656- 00000 - 392000 Operating Transfer In 350,000 350,000 29,167 29,167 29,167 87,501 25.0% NET $ 4,638 $ 4,638 $ 15,777 $ (1,004) $ 31,663 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 46,436 l CITY of ~, Monticello COUNCIL CONNECTION APRIL 25, 2016 FINANCE DEPARTMENT: HI -WAY LIQUORS Hi -Way Liquors Sales through March 31, 2016 Please see the attached schedules and charts for total sales and for each major sales category. CYM — LYM: Current - year -month sales compared to last - year -month sales. For example, March sales for this year are up 3.4% compared to same month sales for last year. Again, lower fuel prices may be providing more discretionary income for items associated with entertainment or recreation. Y -T -D: Year -to -Date total sales over the same period last year. For example, Y -T -D sales for February are up 1.1% over the same period (January through March) last year. The spring wine tasting event will be on Friday, May 13th. Tickets are $25. The two - week spring wine sale will begin on May 14th. The sale provides a 30% discount on all wines. The installed EMV smart -chip card readers and software are now working as designed. The new Europay, MasterCard, and Visa (EMV) standards reflect a shift from magnetic- stripe credit cards to chip- and -pin cards. Considered safer and widely used across Europe and other nations, the chip -based cards remain in the card reading terminal throughout the entire transaction —no swipe. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 3/31/2017 Total Sales Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CYM -LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 249,670.43 $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 -4.1% -4.1% Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 4.3% -0.1% Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 3.4% 1.1% Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 - May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 Total $4,067,185.19 $4,351,038.78 $4,476,911.24 $4,652,921.53 $4,845,781.08 $5,045,614.65 $5,165,741.40 $5,492,060.85 $ 1,128,679.21 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $(4,363,381.64) Change % 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -79.4% $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Monthly Hi -Way Sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2016 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 3/31/2017 Beer Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CYM -LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 122,218.36 $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 -7.8°% -7.8% Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 6.4% -1.2% Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 3.2% 0.3% Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 May 201,232.14 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 Aug 226,653.65 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 Total $2,066,536.61 $2,187,948.04 $2,289,800.74 $2,328,734.96 $2,483,194.18 $2,539,167.70 $2,604,942.46 $2,763,477.59 $ 550,680.61 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ (2,212,796.98) Change % 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% -80.1% Monthly Beer Sales $350,000 ■ 2008 $300,000 ■ 2009 $250,000 ■ 2010 $200,000 ■ 2011 $150,000 ■ 2012 $100,000 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 $50,000 ■ 2015 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 02016 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 3/31/2017 Liquor Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CYM -LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 73,930.87 $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 -0.3% -0.3% Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 0.8% 0.2% Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 0.5% 0.3% Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 Jul 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 Total $1,129,350.74 $1,214,816.54 $1,251,447.54 $1,343,108.97 $1,396,520.80 $1,506,776.00 $1,546,117.83 $1,634,197.68 $ 350,111.58 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (1,284,086.10) Change % 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -78.6% Monthly Liquor Sales $250,000 ■ 2008 $200,000 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 $150,000 ■ 2011 $100,000 _ ■ 2012 u m2013 $50,000 ■ 2014 2015 $ Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 02016 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 3/31/2017 Wine Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CYM -LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 30,700.42 $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ 60,454.56 -1.1% -1.1% Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 64,797.38 3.5% 1.2% Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 71,840.82 7.0% 3.3% Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 Total $ 492,182.87 $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ 197,092.76 Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ (730,639.08) Change % 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% -78.8% Monthly Wine Sales $140,000 ■ 2008 $120,000 — ■ 2009 $100,000 — ■ 2010 $80,000 ■ 2011 $60,000 ■ 2012 $40,000 — 2013 2014 $20,000 — 2015 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2016 CITY OF Monticello COUNCIL CONNECTION APRIL 25, 2016 M1005F.11101IN 'A1IIJ& "I Paid Time Off (PTO) Follow -Up Item (April 11th Council Meeting) For the 1St quarter of 2016 paid time off usage is down 5.9% over the same time period last year. 1580 1560 1540 �a 1520 N 0 1500 x 1480 Cr 1460 1440 1420 PAID TIME OFF COMPARISON- Q1 1563 Hours 2015 Sick /Vacation 2016 PTO CITY OF Monticello COUNCIL CONNECTION APRIL 25, 2016 PARKS DEPARTMENT Staff is working on the following tasks listed below: • Chipping requests • Cemetery; selling and locating graves • Locating Riverside grave lot pins • Equipment /vehicle repairs • Park rental setups • Routine building maintenance • Park sign repairs • Park sign construction • Ballfield maintenance • Building spring startups Updates: West Bridge Park floor rehab: Staff completed the resurfacing of floors. Otter Creek Park: Staff hauled the new gazebo to Otter Creek Park and the roofing will be completed onsite, including staining. Meadow Oak Park: Staff removed the broken swing set and slide at Meadow Oak Park. The new equipment will go in around the first part of May when seasonal staff has been hired. Dog Park: The contractor is in the process of installing the fence around the dog park at Meadow Oak Park and the water line will be bored in as well. The Paws for Parks group is planning a grand opening ribbon cutting ceremony in mid -May. Pioneer Park: Staff plans to redo the floor in the kitchen at the Pioneer Park building after the work has been completed at West Bridge Park. Par -West Park: Staff will move the current problem baskets on the disc golf course to the interior of the park. The move will affect two holes, but should help address Council Connection — 04/25/16 resident concerns about the course. STREET DEPARTMENT Shop: The shop has been busy doing normal maintenance on equipment and vehicles with other repairs as listed: • Replaced cooling system piping for the transmission on unit #116 Mack truck. • Finished rebuilding unit #132 Tymco used for summer street sweeping. • Unit #404 repaired rust, body damage and repainted. • Replaced rear tires, repaired rear tank holders, repaired air conditioning wires and DOT unit #402. • Replaced hydraulic pump in unit #132 Streets: • Sign replacement in the Groveland area. • Sign repairs various areas. • Street light and stop light repairs. • Removed spring road restriction signs. • Started crack sealing the streets in the Hunters Crossing area. • Replaced three trees on E 7t11 St that were hit by vehicles this past winter. • Finished the spring sweeping of streets. Storm Water Pond • Placed rip -rap in River Forest pond area. • Started storm water outfall inspections. Snow Removal: • Removed snow plow equipment from vehicles and stored for the summer. WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT The Water & Sewer Department has been working on the following items: • Cleaned and inspected inside 800,000 gallon standpipe last week. • Cleaned and inspected inside 1MG tower this week, hope to have it online by Friday. • April 25t'l start flushing water mains. Expected to take two men 2.5 weeks to complete. • April 25th start cleaning and servicing lift station and generators. Expected to take two weeks to complete. • Installing radio readers in the Meadow Oaks area. • End of May wash the outside of the 800,000 gallon tower before core city projects starts. Q FLAHERTY � HODD P. A. MEMORANDUM TO: Coalition of Utility Cities FROM: Carolyn Jackson, Chris Henjum, Bradley Peterson DATE: April 21, 2016 RE: Summary of 2016 Changes to Energy Generation Facility Taxation Proposal, and Recommendation Summary Senator Rod Skoe (DFL- Clearbrook) has updated a bill (SF 1636) that adjusts his 2015 proposal to reform the way electric generation property is valued for purposes of local taxation. The Coalition of Utility Cities has analyzed the effect of the bill and recommends that member cities support the amended SF1636, with some conditions discussed below. SF 1636 Overview SF1636 eliminates the personal property tax on electric generation equipment, as well as the pollution control exemption from that tax and the sliding scale exclusion. In its place, the bill creates a new method of valuation: the "electric generation tax base." The bill sets the terms of this electric generation tax base to create a market value close to the current value of the personal property tax on electric generation equipment. In other words, the terms of the bill strive to hold local communities harmless as a result of the change in the law. Specifically, the legislation defines "electric generation machinery " — regardless of the energy source —in a new way. Under the proposal, the Department of Revenue would annually assess the tax base of electric generation machinery under a formula created in the bill. The new valuation is based on a combination of an individual facility's nameplate capacity, average energy production, and amount of nuclear waste storage (i.e. Red Wing and Monticello). Over the interim, Senator Skoe and Senate staff worked with utilities to include transmission and distribution into this tax reform. Also, Senate staff made adjustments to the administrability of the bill. Most importantly for host utility cities, there are adjustments to the inflation rate and to the transition aid (now named "Replacement Aid "). The formula which replaces the personal property tax on electric generation equipment works like this: (Nameplate capacity now in kilowatts x "generation capacity rate ") + (Average electric energy production x "generation rate ") + "Spent fuel base" = Electric Generation Machinery market value. Definitions for the above terms are: • "Generation capacity rate" = $5 for natural gas and nuclear, $10 for coal. • "GPnaratinn rata" = fin f15 ,)S fnr natiiral aat and mirlaar• fin (1;; fnr rnal • "Spent fuel base" = $150 million plus $100,000 per ton of spent nuclear fuel. Recent Changes Adjustment Factor The revised bill uses a new annual "adjustment factor" to increase the value of the factors that go into the formula. This new adjustment factor is the percentage increase, if any, in the "gross domestic product for nonresidential investment" for the current year as compared to the previous year, as reported by the United States Bureau of Economic Analysis. An annual "adjustment factor" changes the value of the factors that go into the formula. In the last five years, this yearly average percentage change was 5.74 %. This factor has ranged from - 15.60% to 10.8% since 1996. Senate staff has indicated this will likely be a five -year average; therefore, it is likely to be an increase from the previous adjustment factor. Replacement Aid The amended formula also makes a change to the aid available to cities who will see a decrease in electric generation tax base multiplied by their local tax rate from old to new law. The first year of the program, "replacement aid" makes cities whole that lose tax base as a result of the change in law. In subsequent years, this replacement aid decreases each year. The replacement aid will equal 95% of the prior year's aid, less other growth in the electric generation machinery tax base. New to this version, there is a "click on" feature to the replacement aid. If a utility makes a major change to its electric operations, such as closing a plant or converting from coal to natural gas, the replacement aid "clicks on." Then the replacement aid makes up the difference between the new tax revenue and the tax revenue from the previous year. Replacement aid continues until it is less than 5% of a city's current tax base multiplied by its tax rate plus the previous year's aid. (Something that makes sense when you run the financial model.) Impact of SF 1636 With the amendments, the legislation continues to do a number of positive things: • The bill resolves long standing tax concerns of host utility cities. • It decreases valuation volatility and adds stability over time. • It locks in the value of new, undepreciated improvements to a number of plants. • It provides transition aid so long as it is needed. • The adjustment factor increases valuation over time. In the analysis below, projections exclude substation, transmission and distribution systems, though the bill includes these systems in its new valuation. This may impact the figures shown, but not significantly. Q FLAHERTY � HOOD P. A. Electric Generation Tax Capacity Trends: The long term trend of electric generation machinery valuation continues to show that, with the yearly adjustment, cities can expect increased valuations over time (all things being equal). Becker: Elec Gen Tax Capacity (Hisbc ical and under 5F 1636, as amended) 3 .Da $25-W 522.39 Say 4. 1 121.1 67 s1a.g $15,00 $13_ $10,00 59.2�.2'r gg.BCi 18.33 39, 9(i #9{4,69 Cohasset: Elec den Fax Upacity (Historical and under 5F 1635, as amended) X7.1]0 $25.00 S24 $ 15-00 N 5.10.40 O.A"? €941 55.00 �1111�61 #Illl��������1� $0.00 g°° Old Rule Elec Gen Property Taxes (total) New Rule Elec Gen Property Taxes (total) Projected Aid in First Year of New Rule BECKER $3,061,900 $4,594,750 $0 COHASSET $1,264,695 $1,797,127 $0 GRANITE FALLS $91,614 $8,936 $82,678 HOYT LAKES $398,389 $346,249 $52,140 MONTICELLO $4,644,239 $2,832,139 $1,812,099 OAK PARK HEIGHTS $1,705,670 $1,572,097 $133,573 RED WING $8,258,094 $9,456,851 $0 Electric Generation Tax Capacity Trends: The long term trend of electric generation machinery valuation continues to show that, with the yearly adjustment, cities can expect increased valuations over time (all things being equal). Becker: Elec Gen Tax Capacity (Hisbc ical and under 5F 1636, as amended) 3 .Da $25-W 522.39 Say 4. 1 121.1 67 s1a.g $15,00 $13_ $10,00 59.2�.2'r gg.BCi 18.33 39, 9(i #9{4,69 Cohasset: Elec den Fax Upacity (Historical and under 5F 1635, as amended) X7.1]0 $25.00 S24 $ 15-00 N 5.10.40 O.A"? €941 55.00 �1111�61 #Illl��������1� $0.00 g°° Granite Falls: Elec Gin Tax Capacity (Hisbxkal and urKler SF 1636, as amended) 50130 90.25 1-24 00-M sO,15 $0-JjbLam.cq SCLIO SO.W. SOM W.C4b-o 50.05 sa.00.62 MM-02 SO-W-Cl2 50-00 R.Um 1.B.1 R R ry R R R Hoyt Lakes: Bec Gen Tax Capacity (HistNiEal and under SF 1636, as amended) SOAP-9� $0.20 Monticello: Elec Gen Ux Capacity (HisW6zal and under SF 1636, as amended) 57 $4.00 $19 315. DO ti3 3,41 $1 60 5 E 2W 36 S $10-oo 56jo.47 $.5.M IVAP34 0,�4 %3.fo,45 Vhklt M Lft 1 M W S Oak Park Heights: $14,+x!0 $12.00 $10.40 3$A4 —�� $600 $2.00 3 AKA15 S1M Red Wing: FL HERT ' HOOD P. A. Elec Gen Tax Capacity (Historical and under SE 1636, as amended) #5040 $45.00 $40.00 .00 $34.co UP 32s.a4 $24.04 $ $1S'C* $14.29 $10,00 j5.46 $5.44 Is5M;.77 i 54.44 _ Replacement Aid Model $:. '3 fs&1> 14027 - Elec Gen Tax Capacity (Historical and under SF 1636, as amended) .3s S �s.� SzS 3QJ�di sg.2� ssa I% 102 Over the long term, the Replacement Aid formula appears to adequately compensate a city for plant closures and transitions. Although there is a delay in the data from a plant closure to when it appears in a plant's valuation, decreases in valuation result in increased Replacement Aid. $ 9.00 "'00 7.00 SEGO LA $4. 5 =im $2,00 51.00 $D_m Becher Local Property Tax and Replacement Aid s 5 9' 7 s ■ Becker Local Pro p@ Taxesfrom Eiec Ge n Machinery ■ Becker Re- placement Ad (drily @lee ,Ben machinery} (includes planned closure) Cohasset Local Property Tax and Replacement Aid 54.00 3.50 S IOD LA $1.50 9 5 5 $10.50 5 6 $0.00 20117 2018 2010 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2125 2126 2027 2028 2029 2030 2(M w Cahasset Loral Property Taxes from Ele c Gen lMaehinery S ■ Becker Local Pro p@ Taxesfrom Eiec Ge n Machinery ■ Becker Re- placement Ad (drily @lee ,Ben machinery} (includes planned closure) Cohasset Local Property Tax and Replacement Aid 54.00 3.50 S IOD LA $1.50 9 5 5 $10.50 5 6 $0.00 20117 2018 2010 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2125 2126 2027 2028 2029 2030 2(M w Cahasset Loral Property Taxes from Ele c Gen lMaehinery Q FLAHERTY � HOOD P. A. Granite Fall, Local Property Tax and Replacement Arad $0.17 LA 517.0 $4.07 9 � � 0.47 ' 6 " 5 5 5 4 541.03 SO.01 1 1S 1 X 1 1 1 1 15 1 2 SJ2 2$ Z 50.�4U 2017 2018 2019 2020 2G21 2022 2023 . 2024 2025 2026 2027 . 2028 2029 2730 2031 *Garanite Falk. Re placement Aid {onlyelec gen mach rlerya * Granite Falls Local Property Taxestrorn Elec Geri iWlach.inery Hoyt Lakes Local Property Tax and Replacement Alid 50.7f1 s LA 5�. 5 3 g. 12 3 $13.34? 5. 7 $ 4 (3 S � � � $13 19 40.TO $0.04 2017 2018 2019 2020 21321 2032 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 . 2028 2029 2030 1031 * Hoyt Lakes Replae emenE Also jonly elec 8en machinery] * Hoyt Lakes Local Property Taxes from Elec Gen Machinery Monticello Local Property Tax and Replacement Aid 56.00 s $5.D3 54.00 6 S 4 S 3 2$ 0 Ln a,iJ7 S 4 5 6 4 3 3 4 $ 3 S 3 Lao 21317 20.18 2019 202G 202.1 21322 3023 20,24 2025 21336 2027 . 2028 2029 2030 2031 IN Monficello Replacernent Aid (only elec, gear machinery) ■ Monticell0Local Property Taxes from Ele{ Gen Machinery Oak Parr Heights Local Property Tax and Replacement Aid a 3.543 s s 0 C1 Ln r. a 51.50 7 2 21317 20.18 20119 2020 2021 21322 2023 20:24 21325 21326 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 • Oak PaA Heights 8eplaurnent Aid (onlyekec Fen machinery • Oak Sark Heights local Proge rry Taxes from Elec Gen Machinery Q FLAHERTY � HOOD P. A. Rod Wing Local Property Tax and Replacement Arid 575,00 mcio LA C S5_ x 5 S5 3$ 4S SS 3 50,00 2017 2018 70119 2M 7021 2027 7023 3024 7025 202-6 7027 7078 2029 2030 2031 0 Red Wpr�3 Replacement Aid (only let gen machinery) ■ Red Wing Local Property Taxes trorn Elec Gera Mactririery