Parks Commission Agenda Packet 06-24-1999
.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
. 8.
9.
10.
.
AGENDA ------------
REGULAR MEETING - PARKS COMMISSION
Thursday, June 24, 1999 - 4:30 p.m.
Memhers:
Larry Nolan, Earl Smith, Fran Fair, Rick Traver, Nancy McCaffrey
Call meeting to order.
Approval of the minutes for the regular meeting on May 20, 1999.
Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
Discussion on selection of a meeting time for the annual tour.
Review the park and trail plan for the Groveland preliminary plat. - Jeff O'Neill
Discussion on development of park area adjacent to Klein Farms park - Pioneer Park.
North Anchor report. - Earl Smith, Rick Traver
Park Maintenance report. - Gregg Engle
Update on Riverfest Committee - Wanda Kraemer
Adjourn.
.
.
.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - PARKS COMMISSION
Thursday, May 20, 1999 - 4:30 p.m.
Mcm bers Present:
New Member:
Members Absent:
Staff Present:
Fran Fair, Earl Smith, Rick Traver
Nancy McCaffrey
Larry Nolml
Gregg Engle, John Simola, Wanda Kraemer
I. Call to order.
The meeting was called to order by acting Chairman Earl Smith.
2. Approval of the minutes for the regular meeting on February 18, I 999.(.Jeff O'Neill)
Minutes for the Fehruary meeting were not available at this meeting.
Approval of the minutes for the regular meetinQ on April 15, 1999.
FRAN FAIR MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 15,
1999 PARKS MEETING. SECONDED BY RICK TRAVER. Motion passed
unanimous I y.
3.
Consideration of addinl-! items to the agenda.
Gregg Engle, Park Superintendent, added a discussion with Mark Mattice, Wright County
Parks Department.
4. Discussion on selection of Parks Commission member.
After a short discussion A RECOMMENDA nON WAS MADE BY FRAN FAIR TO
APPOIN'r NANCY MCCAFFREY TO TI-lE PARKS COMMISSION TO COMPLETE
JENNIFER FEARING'S TERM. SECONDED BY RICK TRAVER. Motion passed
unanimously.
5. Citizens requests.
Todd Banek had requested to be on the Park agenda to discuss coordination with the
township on playing field development. He was not able to make the May meeting but
would reschedule for another meeting.
.
.
.
6.
Discussion on the North Anchor meeting.
Rick Traver reported on the meeting of the North Anchor committee. He explained the
short term district which included blocks 62, 63, 64, 55, 54, 50, 51, and 52. In this
district there will be an cmphasis on acquiring land for future development. Ifthcrc is a
time whcn thcre is more property for sale than the budgct allows, the property closest to
the park and/or river will be chosen. The North Anchor Committee will be sending a
recommendation to the City Council that will also request an annual dollar amount to be
included in the budgct for land purchases in this area.
The Commissioners discussed improvements for Bridge Park with John Simola, Public
Works Director. Mr. Simola explained the lift station would be relocated to the the south
west side of the park at the end of Walnut next to the diagonal parking area. The lift
station would be the size of a signal box. There would also be a generator in this
location. The sanitary sewer line would also be replaced at this time. After this projcct
was done the park improvements could be started. This could be started yet this ycar.
The Commissioners discussed maintaining the area next to the park that is owned and
being developed by John Komerek. Greg Engle, Park Superintendent, was willing to
work with Mr. Komerek. Nancy McCaf1I'ey volunteered to call Mr. Komerek and discLlss
the maintenrn1ce of this area.
9.
Added items.
Wright County Parks Superintendent, Mark Mattice, informed the Commissioners on
improvements being completed in Montissippi Park. This year there would be road and
pedestrian trails paved. The Commissioners discussed ways to connect the city trails to
the county trails at Montissippi park. Mr. Mattice added that future plans include a play
structure, sand volleyball court, restroom, picnic structure, and cross county skiing trails.
The Commissioners stated they were very interested in working with Wright County for
better pathway access into the park and grants for futurc projects.
9. Adjourn.
EARL SMITH MADE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. SECONDED BY
RICK TRAVER. Motion passed unanimously.
Wanda Kraemer
Administrative Assistant
.
.
.
Parks Commission 6/24/99
Item #5. Review the park and trail Dlan for the Groveland {lreliminarv {llat.
See attached 3 pages for reference.
:~~
...Ue
1
~
J
u_J
I
~~ #5
Monticello. Paired with the community center
facility should be a search area for a
neighborhood park location. The west side of
the traditional downtown does not have a
neighborhood facility serving the area's
residential development.
Due to the increased activity in this area, as well
as. the Monticello Revitalization Plan's emphasis
on pedestrian activity, this area includes a
number of key pedestrian crossing locations.
Broadway and m 25 (Pine Street) have several
pedestrian crossings which will require continued
monitoring.
I IfsOUlbWost Area
! This sub-region consists primarily of land which
is in the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area.
A. As future development, the key for park location
U will be adherence to the policies listed in the
Policy Plan section of this document. Of
particular note is a proposed search area for a
major community park providing active play field
recreation west of m 25.
j
-'J
..j
ill
lD
Also important to this area will be utilization of
the large ponds in the central portion of the sub-
region. More passive open space can be
designed to benefit adjacent residential and
commercial land uses in this area. The City
should work with land owners and developers to
strike an appropriate balance between public use
and private view.
Northwest Area
m
The northwest portion of the community is
centered around a major county facility -
~. Montissippi County Park. In addition, this area
is the western terminus to the Broadway off-road
pathway, and a ballfield complex on leased NSP
;~
1M
Park System Plan: Page 32
land. However, the area suffers from a lack of
usable neighborhood park space. Most of the
neighborhood facilities south of West Broadway
(County 75) are not usable park spaces. The
Plan recommends that this area be the subject of
an intensive search for smaller neighborhood
spaces to provide informal play areas to existing
development.
West Area
Sharing many attributes of the Northwest Area,
this sub-region borders the Broadway pathway
and is short of neighborhood park area.
However, it has more open space amenities,
including the Monticello Country Club Golf
Course, the Magic Kingdom play facility at
Pinewood Elementary, and a planned
neighborhood park area in the area of Elm Street
and West 7th Street. One of the primary issues
in this area is pedestrian access across Interstate
94. The Plan contemplates a pedestrian crossing
at some point to facilitate movement between
Pinewood, Montissippi Park, and the future
growth in the Southwest Area.
Monticello Comprehensive Parks Plan
Park System Plan
5A
1
it'
(VI ,)1"'7
.:.\ . 0
I'
.}
)
(,
v_
I ~
f' ./ ' ",- '1 ,
A-~, .vl) r
';'C,/' r:lr / (I
Jj" .Iv j,
~j,}J /,/..F ...j -I'f" -if
\J/ II' ,I"" ~
"I
"
, -1}>
"1'l
~. ;}J'
'" t,.l l.\
i \ I
\ ').A
'If /
,l
~b
lit
~
()
\'
1\,
'}'
l..
r^1t1v
~) \0
e
~ (,~
~
.
.
::;l:;~J~::r--~,~l -- -- __ __
_~~.. 45 __ --.::_______j: _
'" --.,
~ -- ---~~- I I
..,. ~::- --- --- ~ ""--....... -
'" -- -- >.-
, ..."'<:-- - -- '" .~,
~ ,~-'; I ."^____.- ,~
~ ~~~~-_l_-E--\ II
~'-:::::--- Ii! L . \ '1_,1'1 '\--
I "---~
O\.::y.N\~
:\u--
I ,
I I i
'I i
), 1
f87'4Q 5
\ &MIl
\ - "'.
\:. ::
\~i.:
'\ ,
-"-t-
,
" "'"
" ...........
-, , 1
DEVELOPMENT NOTES.......... '\-
..... '
:-... '!63.?1 AC
,too.at! AC
, 18.53 AC
<./
----
-
----
i"" .A,
655.51
-,
,
z
pas~~
~ ,.~ ....--'
------..-
~,
~ "" '-
~.....<'
'< ~'-::::-,
'< ~........"
'< ~,
'~
COMPOSITE SIT!
OUTUlT AREA
OUTLOTS A-C
COUKERlCAL
OllnOTS E-F
MULTI-FAMILY
OUTUlTS D,G-M
OPEN SPACE
TRAILS/PAR)(
OUTLOT N
SINGLE-FAMILY
LOT AREA
TOTAL S/F LOTS
S/F DENSITY
TOTAL OPEN SPACE
MAX S/F LOT AREA
MIN S/F LOT AREA
AVG S/F LOT AREA
558.07
~,
,
,
~'
---f--
" \
1
I 9.89 AC
51.M AC
,2G.28 AC
107.28 AC
I
_~ LOTS
:If.8 U/AC
L 20X
38,Jpll SQ.FT
1I,9PO SQ.FT
14,2!Kl SQ.FT
r
o eo 100
~it>g . PIann;"g . Sur.-...,ng
~
- .IIFRA
, ",',',,-', Fila RDaI
AIsocIIIII, IIIL
-=-~-=-=
,f-'" ~_
CIIIII
DeWID, LLC.
11131"- --. 1M
eo. IIIpID, 11II'"
(112) .....
PnjIct
Groveland
........ WI
... ...
PI8Dmlwy Plat
NorItI Half
:..~~,~~=.,
:':..:'~~..:'~ ~
_ 4.. './ ""- t1-L
Da:II II.I'UJIiI
- - ,MI,
1looignoI- -
- - -
- 'JItVII
.......
... .......
~D
5U
_RLEIIll.: 11m
......... -...- ---..
.
.
,to
j
J
",
f'
i'
l
\.,
., ..
f'1...
.
,/"
"j'''!.''''~ '01','"
.,..+
t
,'~
.
.
t~
..,.,."t.I'.....'4;",.~'
/"
~'
f
.... \
. ""..
.
:c:~%l. 7
Council Agenda - 5/26/98
13. Consideration of acceptina: the feasibility study and authorizine preparation of '
plans and soecification for improvements to lift station. Walnut Street. and
East/West Bridee Park. (1.0./1.5.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Parks Commission has prepared a concept plan for improvements to East/West
Bridge Park. The plans are a result of considerable time and effort by the Parks
Commission, members of the MCP, and City staff toward development of a park plan that
accentuates the benefits of the river setting and coincides with the downtown development
plan. The plan also shows the reconnection of Walnut Street to the park and also
replacement and relocation of an aging lift station.
As you know, Walnut Street currently ends at a parking lot. In accordance with the MCP
plan, Walnut Street will be connected through to the park. In addition, as the roadway
runs adjacent to the park, it will be modified for head-in parking. The parking area now in
the middle of the park will be eliminated and replaced with playground equipment. The
City Council has budgeted funds for these improvements for the past two years and has
made this item a priority for the City.
.
Cost estimates were prepared by the City Engineer for each item in the plan. There seems
to be a natural sequence to completing the park plan; however, the utility improvements
will need to be completed first because this will cause the most impact on the use of the
park. It will be important to finish all of the utility items in one season instead of
disrupting the park for two to three years in a row. After the utility improvements are
completed, the other items can be phased as the budget allows.
The total estimated cost of the entire project, including improvements to Walnut Street
and the lift station, is $734,90; total cost of the proposed first phase of this project is
$356,000. The $356,000 will be distributed between three areas: sanitary sewer fund,
street fund, and the park fund. The sanitary sewer lift station ($150,000) was due for
replacement and arguably is not a park expense. The park budget for 1998 was $60,000.
the total park-related costs in 1998 are estimated at $140,000, which leaves a deficit of
$80,000. Please note that the parks Commission capital improvement program had
earmarked $100,000 for park improvements over five years. The City will need to use
reserves to pay for the balance of what has been budgeted, and as the years proceed, we
will need to budget additional funds to pay back the City for the additional costs beyond
what the budget called for.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
.
1.
Motion to approve the feasibility study and authorize preparation of plans and
specifications.
2. Motion to deny approval of the feasibility study as proposed.
21
'fA
..
.
Council Agenda - 5/26/98
3.
Motion to modify and approve plans as proposed.
If Council feels that the cost of the project is too high or too great at this time to
complete, restoration of the park will need to be delayed until the amount can be
budgeted for in 1999.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDA nON:
The City Administrator recommends that the first phase of the project be completed in its
entirety. The extension of Walnut Street along with the improvements to the park are
items that have been placed in the budget and are priorities for completion by the City
Council. It is our view that it makes sense to do the entire utility and observation deck
portion of the project at one time to make the greatest impact in the most efficient manner.
The other park improvement items in the cost estimates will be included in the park budget
for 1999 and beyond. According to City Council priorities identified in the comprehensive
plan as prepared by the MCP and Planning Commission, development of the river parks is
very important; therefore, it is our view that in keeping with these priorities, this project
should proceed.
.
D.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Concept Plan; Budget; City Engineer's memo; Time schedule.
.
22
1-0 ..
zte
'0
.~ ?Oz
~ 1-1 ~
~ u ~
C1 n
~ tTJ
"
o ~
o >
?:'
~
v
n
o
Z
(j
tTj
~
~
----~---C--
11>
l1I~
~l .
-cU
-m
~ '
- (/'J
-~
~
~O
~ "
Z
0~,
,. 0 1
~
o
z
~
~
n
m
r
r
o
~
z
., .:" ~
.,. ~y
. "0 ," <;.,>".",
. .
, -
. ~.;.':... ?:/.;.~,l.
.
.
.
Bridge Park Budget - 1998
Sanitary Total
Project Items Sewer Street Park Amount
Lift Station/ $150,000 $150,000
Sanitary Sewer
Walnut Street $39,500 $39,500 $79,000
Terrace Wall
- East Bridge $26,000 $26,000
- West Bridge $26,000 $26,000
Observation Deck $75,000 $75,000
Total $176,000 $39,500 $140,500 $356,000
)"t.l'i ,.f,n
... t?tW"'~)A
\ ~
"\
~~~f
C:\SANDY\WOR.D\PAR.Ks.BUDGET .PM
1D
Apr-09-9a ~2:~3P
.
.
.
.
WSB
ItA. Min:e1steadl. P.E.
nrtl A. WciSll. P.E.
r~er R. WiJlenhrinl\. P. F..
lJnn,,1d W. Srern;. P. r.. .
Rnn;ld 1\. Bf~Y, P.r..
350 Westwood Lake Office
8441 wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55426
612-541-4800
FAX 541-1700
Ci Associates, Inc.
Memorandum
To:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Monticello
From:
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
City Engineer
Date:
April 9, 1998
Re:
Bridge Park Improvements Cost Estimate
WSB Project No. 2014.00
This cost estimate addn:sses the recently completed Bridge Park lmprovetnem Study lhat wac; intended
to beautify and enhance a major entry point into the City. Located at the Trunk Highway (TH) 2S
intersection with East River Street, the park provides an opportunity to create a gateway into the Cily
that demonstrates the pride and character of Monticello.
The cost estimates address the various items included wilh the Iiridge Park lmprovement Study
completed by Northwest Associated Consultants. The items arc sepamted into West side and East side
improvements. All cost.'\ are project costs and include a 10% contingency and 28% indirect cosLo; added
to th~ construction cost estimates. A summary is included iltthe end of this memo for each phase.
The following items pertain to the West Bridge Park area:
1. Sanitary Sewer Relocation S31,400
This item includes replacement oftha ex.isting to" vep sanitary sewer from its current loc~tion
across the park with a 12" PVC sewer on a perimeter alignment along Walnut Street and E.lst
River Street to a new lift station. The project cost includes a 4" service line to the existing
Brick Park shelter building. No information regarding the current elevation and grade or this
sewer wa.'i available in completing this item.
2.
Sanitary Lift Station S84,500
This item includes the removal and disposal of the existing wet well and pump house and
construction of 1.\ submersible pump station. The submersible pump stations are low profile
and will be minimally visible to the public. Given this, our recommendation is to construct the
1'.\WI'WI/'lIJOI4. -pol
InfTllstructure Engincen Planne,-s
F.QU^L o.,IIORrUNITY EMI'I.OYI:!t
7E.
Apr-09-9S 12:13P
.
.
.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Monticello
April 9, 1998
Page 2
station near the existing site to minimize cost. The City has an opportunity to examine the
desired capacity of this station during design.
3. 8' Wide Sidewalk" and Patios $29,500
This item includes all sidewalks. paths and patios in the West Iiridge Park area except for the
Ice Rink, street sidewalk, and the Under-Bridge lookout arca. The typical section is assumed
aL 4" concrete on a sand subgrddc.
4. Ice Rink $51.000
This item includes the concrete ice rink pad south of the existing brick building. The rink is
proposed to be S" concrete with a minimal slope the center of the rink. The inverted rink. will
facilitaLe the freezing ofLhe skating surface in the winter while the storm drain at the low point
will keep the walk free of bird baths during the warmer months. TIle storm sewer drain is
included in the eost estimate.
5.
8' Sidewalk Alone Walnut Street and East River Street 520.000
This item ineludes the sidewalks and inlersection 1ill areas on WalnuL and East River SLreets
with a color patterning at the TH 25 intersection. This sidewalk is assumed with an 8' width
because of the likelihood of high pedestrian traffic associated with the park.
6. Fence S40.000
This item includes the uMonticello Rail" fence. This priee is tor the west side of the
intersection only. The cost is based on the quote received from the Chowell Welding Company.
7. Walnut Street Improvement North of East River Street 539,500
This item includes removl\l or the exisling pavement and curb and guuer. paving wiLh 4"
asphalt/6" granular sectiop 48' wide with 60 degree perpendicular parkins on both sides of the
street. segmental block retaining wall on the west side;and the conver~ioll nfWalnut Street to
one way (north).
8.
Walnut Street Improvement South of East River Street $39..,';00
This item includes the paving, demolition, and storm sewer required for the connection of[ :a...t
River Street and Walnut Street to the south. The existing condition hao; Walnut Street
approximately 5' above East River Street. The reconstnlclion of a large ponion of Wulnul
SLreet (1 SO linear feel) and the parking lot cast of Walnut Street will be required. The removal
of a concrete stair and two catch basins. ~ well as the construction of sidewalk, curb and gutter
and site grading, are also included in the cost estimate.
\'.
1f
Apr-09-9S 12:13P
.
.
.
Honorabl4! Mayor and City Council
City of Monticello
Ap,iI9,1998
Pag4! 3
9. D<<:molition of Existing Structure., $8.500
This item includes removal and disposal of the existing shelter, playground equipment and
gravel parking lot.
10. PlaY2round Equipment $35,000
This itcm includes miscellaneous playground equipment. handicappeu accessihle equipment
and surface, and edging to keep sand in playground area. Thc cstimateu amount can valY
depending on the type and quantity of equipmcnt desired by the City.
11.
Sand .
This item includes granular material. 12" thick around the playground equipment.
$2,500
12.
Sod $12,(jOO
This item includes the sod for all disturbed areas in the West Bridge Park area. If desircd, seed
can be used instead of sod with the obvious drawback ofa longer gruwth period before Lise of
the facility can begin. Seed would be less expensive.
13. Gazebo Improvcm<<:ntJ S8.500
This item includes raising the roof 3', adding decorative railing, adding a weather vane to lhe
lOp, painting the structure white and re-shingling thc rool:
14. Terrace Wall $26.000
This item includes the segmental block retaining walls along TH 25 and East River Street. The
wall is assumed to average 4' high with a maximum height of5'.
15. Lighting S3S,000
This item includes decorative single globe lighting posts along the paths and sidewalks.
16. Irri2ation System SlS,SOO
The irrigation system is included to facilitate thc centering ofplanlS anti grass. The sY!ltem will
include automatic timers, pop.up sprinkler heads, and spray nozzles.
17. Planting! 517.500
This Itcm includes 2" caliper trees and low cover shrubbery and hcdgcrow along TH 25 ami
Ei.lSl River Street.
J:\WPWlN'.10'. 0CIIlU09
ryG
Apr-09-9a ~2:~4P
.
.
.
Honorable Mayo, and City Council
City of Monticell(J
Ap,il9,1998
Page 4
18. Electrical Bury
No cost has been estimated for item as NSP has not had the opportunity 10 review tht: phm. Tht:
cost figures will be forwarded as soon a... they become available.
19. FishillK Pier
We have nu cust available for this item. We have noted iL as a pussibility with this project and
will estimate a cust if it becomes a desired option.
The lbllowing items are included for the East Bridge Park only
1. 8' Wide sidewalks. $6,000
This item includes the path along the Mississippi Rivcr exclusivc of the under~bridse walkout
and the sidewalk/vehicle aceess from Walnut Street to the brick building.
2.
8' Sidewalk AloDI East River Street $17,000
This item includes the sidewalks and intersection fill areas on East River Street with a color
panerning at the TH 2S intersection. This sidewalk is a.<lsumed with an g' widlh bect\use ur the
likelihoud of high pedestrian traffic associated with the park.
3. 8' Aaaregate Path 51.800
This item includes the 8' aggregate path that winds through the East Bridge Park. The aggregate
section is assumed at 6" thick.
4. Ramp to East River Stre<<:t 52.400
This item includes an 8' wide eoncrete ramp from Ea..t River Street tu East Bridge Park.. Uk!::
the other ~idewalk items. this is assumed at 4" thick.
s. Terra<<:e Wall S26,000
This item includes the segmental block retaining wall!'l along TH 2S and East River Strcet. The
wall is assumed to average 4' high with ~\ maximum height ofS'o
6. Sod $12,600
This item includes the sod for all disturbed areas in the East Bridge Park area. If desired. seed
can be used instead of sod with the obvious drawback of a longer growth period before use of
the facility can begin. Seed would be lcss cxpensive.
P:\WfoWINUOI_ 0Cl'0409.I.h_.wp!
. .111... .....oII_........"..v
'114
.
~~-09_9B 1Z,ZSP
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Monticello
April 9, 1998
Page 5
7. Fence 540,000
This item includes the "Monticello Rail" fence. This price is forthe eust side of the intersection
only. The cost is based on the quote received from the Chowen Welding Company.
8. Lighting $32,000
This item includes decorative single globe lighting posts along the paths and sidc:walks.
9. IrrigatioD $15.500
The irrigation system is included to tacilita.te the centering of plants and grass. The system will
include automa.tic timers, pop-up sprinkler heads, and spray no7.7.les.
10. Plantings 58,500
This Item includes 2" caliper trees. low cover shrubbery and hedgerow along TH 25 and East
River Street.
.
11.
Under Bridge Walkway $75,600
This item includes the widened walkway WlderTH 25, with relaining wall, railing and com;rete
!\urface. Because work will lake place in the Mississippi River flood plain and in Mn/DOT
right-of~way. the permit process will be very involved. This additional process cost is included
above.
Sumnlary of ":stimated Project Costs
Walnut Street south of East River Street
Walnut Street north of East River Street
Sanitary Sewer Relocation incl. Lift Station
West Bridge Park Improvement.Ii
East Park. Improvements
Under Bridge Walkway
Total
$39,500
$39,500
$116.90Q
$301.600
$161,800
$75,600
1734,900
Please contact me at 541-4800 with any questions or comments.
.
jb/nm
J;'\WPWIt.'\201-l.
fI:I.
.
.
.
Bridge Park Time Schedule
Sanitary Sewer Walnut Street
Lift Station Improvements Terrace Wall'"
Pipe Relocation N&S (Both Sides)
Feasibility Report May 26 May 26 May 26
Acceptance
Order Plans &
Specs
Accept Plans & June 22 June 22 June 22
Specs, Authorize Ad
for Bid
Receive Bids July 17 July 17 July 17
Award Contract July 27 July 27 July 27
Begin Construction August 3 August 3 August 3
Substantial September 3 - pipe September 3 October 1
Complete November 1 - L.S.
'" This item will need to be staggered with sanitary sewer work.
C:\SANDY\WORIN'ARKS\TIME-SCH.FM
'1J
.
M inll ~~
C\OA
Council Minutes - 5/26/98 r
13. Consideration of plan for staging West Bridge Park/Walnut Street improvements.
Assistant Administrator Jeff O'Neill reported that the Parks Commission prepared a
concept plan for improvements to East/West Bridge Park, which included the
reconnection of Walnut Street to River Street and replacement and relocation of a lift
station. In addition, the plan calls for building a terraced wall on each side of
Highway 25 to set the framework for future development of the park itself. The Parks
Commission elected to delete the observation deck from the first phase. The estimated
cost of the entire project, including improvements to Walnut Street and the lift station, is
$734,900; total cost of the proposed first phase is $281,000 after removal of the
observation deck from the project.
Mr. Scott Douglas noted that Walnut Street was connected to River Street in the past and
created problems for some of the businesses along Walnut. Public Works Director John
Simola added that the City should hold a meeting with property owners regarding the
extension of Walnut Street to discuss the effects of the project.
.
Mr. Pat Sawatzke, one of the property owners along Walnut Street, agreed that
improvements were needed to the park but noted his concern about the impact to his
property if Walnut Street is extended. He noted that properties were assessed for filling
in the area when Walnut Street was disconnected from River Street and felt that property
values would suffer if the grade was returned to its original status. Mr. Sawatzke
requested that City staff meet with property owners to review the impacts the project will
have on parcels along Walnut Street prior to approval of the feasibility study.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BILL FAIR AND SECONDED BY
BRUCE THIELEN TO AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICA nONS
ON THE LIFT STATION/SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AND TERRACED
WALLS; DELAY THE OBSER V A TION DECK AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PARKS
COMMISSION; AUTHORIZE REMOVAL OF THE CONCESSION STAND IN BRIDGE
PARK AS REQUESTED BY THE PARKS COMMISSION; TABLE IMPROVEMENTS TO
WALNUT STREET PENDING FURTHER RESEARCH. Motion carried unanimously.
.
r"J ~ tp
.
.
': "--"
.
\
Council Agenda - 7/27/98
10. Consideration of approvine concept plans and authorizine preparation of plans and
specifications for parking improvements to Bridge Park at Walnut Street. and
consider approving plans for realignment of sanitary sewer and replacement of
aging lift station at Bridge Park. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the previous meeting ofthe City Council on this topic, Council directed staff to review
the Bridge Park plan with the Parks Commission. The cost and project element phasing
were concerns of the Council at that time, which were to be addressed by the Parks
Commission. Subsequently, the Parks Commission reviewed the plans and now requests
that the Council proceed with authorization to complete the relocation of the lift station
and installation of the sanitary sewer line and also complete the head-in parking
improvements along Walnut adjacent to the park. It,is the view of the Parks Commission
that the parking and sanitary sewer work must be completed under any scenerio and that
time is wasting; therefore, we should get this portion of the project started immediately.
Please note that the parking improvements as proposed by the Parks Commission would
be simply an extension of the existing road surface, and there would be no major
reconstruction of Walnut Street; therefore, no assessment to adjoining property owners
would be necessitated by this simple project.
With regard to the park improvements, including the retaining wall, sidewalk, and railing,
the Park Superintendent is working with the Public Works Director and the City Engineer
on design alternatives for the retaining wall and railing, which will be reviewed at the
upcoming special meeting of the Parks Commission. A recommendation from the Parks
Commission should follow for review by Council at the regular Council meeting on
August 10.
The plans for the sanitary sewer improvements call for realignment of the sanitary sewer
line along the perimeter of the site, thereby leaving the middle of the park open for future
development. It also calls for placing the lift station at the northerly end of the new
parking bays, which will allow the parking bays to provide a dual purpose for parking and
for staging area for maintenance, thus reducing the amount of paving needed in the area.
On Friday, July 24, Brad Johnson met with City staff and the Mayor to discuss
redevelopment plans for the Front StreetIBridge Park area. Johnson noted that his
concepts, if followed, would not be consistent with the current parking, sanitary sewer,
and park design concepts. Investments made today in Walnut Street parking/sanitary
sewer relocation, etc., could be lost if Johnson's concepts are followed. This information
was not available to the Parks Commission when it made its recommendation.
10
'1L
i
"-
Council Agenda - 7/27/98
.
'<
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve sanitary sewer/lift station plans and head-in parking plan and
authorize advertisement for bids.
Please note that under this alternative, the fire hall driveway plans and the
Walnut/Bridge Park parking plans will be combined into one project.
2. Motion to deny approval of the sanitary sewer/lift station plans and head-in
parking plan.
3. Motion to table action on the sanitary sewer/lift station plans and head-in parking
plan.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
.
\,.--
The City Administrator recommends alternative #3. Given the uncertainty with regard to
development design in the area, it may make sense to stall park development until a
City/developer design is developed. However, the down side is that it could be some
time before such plans are implemented. How long does the Council wish to stall? If we
wait for a redevelopment plan to take shape, it could be some time before the park is
developed. Such issues could be reviewed by the Parks Commission at the special
meeting scheduled for next Thursday.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
See previous meeting's agenda item regarding design of the head-in parking.
.
l~.
11
rJrr1
.
.
.
Co
Council Minutes - 7~sY
9.
Consideration of ordering plans and specifications for extending Walnut Street (Proiect
98-13C) and for development of portions of West and East Bridge Park.
Deputy City Administrator Jeff O'Neill reported that staff met with property owners
regarding the Walnut Street extension and Bridge Park improvements. Most in
attendance did not support the extension of Walnut Street, as they felt there would be no
benefit to the local businesses. In addition, a major concern for adjoining property
owners was the potential for assessments, especially since an assessment associated with
the cost of developing the parking lot and closing the road had recently been paid.
O'Neill also noted that the project would result in the loss of 31 spaces; however, 21 new
spaces would be developed on Walnut Street along the park.
Most property owners in the area were supportive of the park improvements, and it was
noted that Walnut Street would remain a two-way street rather than being converted to a
one-way as originally planned.
The estimated cost to build the road and sidewalk relating to Walnut Street was estimated
at $124,700, which would be funded by the general fund unless Council opted to assess
adjoining property owners for benefits resulting from adding to the life of the street. Park
improvements were proposed for two phases, with the first consisting of excavation,
retaining wall construction, and sidewalk, estimated at $147,700. Adding decorative
fencing to the project would be an additional $80,000.
Council discussed the proposed extension of Walnut Street, and it was noted that it may
be needed if the park area is converted to commercial; however, if it remained as a city
park, it was suggested that the money proposed for Walnut Street be used for amenities in
the park. Councilmember Bruce Thielen stated that he would like to review the retaining
wall area of the proposal, as many of the city parks need additional funding.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED
BY CLINT HERBST TO SEP ARA TE THE IMPROVEMENTS INTO TWO PROJECTS,
BRIDGE PARK IMPROVEMENTS AND WALNUT STREET EXTENSION; TO DELAY
ACTION ON THE WALNUT STREET EXTENSION PROJECT; AND SEND THE
PROPOSED BRIDGE PARK IMPROVEMENTS BACK FOR PARKS COMMISSION
REVIEW AND RETURN TO COUNCIL ON JULY 27. Motion carried unanimously.
Council then discussed whether benefiting property owners should be assessed for the
Walnut Street improvements. Mayor Fair suggested that staff prepare alternatives and
recommendations to be discussed at the next Council meeting.
,.,rJ
-P'
.
.
.
co~
Council Minutes - 7/27/98 Y
10.
Consideration of approving concept plans and authorizing preparation of plans and
specifications for parking improvements to Bridge Park at Walnut Street. and consider
approving plans for realignment of sanitary sewer and replacement of aging lift station at
Bridge Park.
City Administrator Rick W o If steller reported that staff recommended tabling action on
this item pending additional discussion regarding redevelopment of property along the
river near Bridge Park. The developer will present a proposal to the Parks Commission
on Thursday, July 30.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO
TABLE ACTION ON BRIDGE PARK IMPROVEMENTS FOR TWO WEEKS PENDING THE
DEVELOPER'S PRESENTATION TO THE PARKS COMMISSION AND DIRECTED STAFF
TO REPORT BACK TO CITY COUNCIL. Motion carried unanimously.
'10
..
.
.
~
Council Agenda - 11/9/98
9.
Consideration of proceeding with West Bridz:e Park and lift station improvements.
(J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you recall, in July the City Council was asked to consider making major
improvements to West Bridge Park along with reconstruction of the lift station. Council
tabled action on this matter on July 27, 1998, pending input from the Parks Commission
on redevelopment plan concepts that could potentially impact the park improvements
under consideration. The Parks Commission met with Brad Johnson in conjunction with
development planning for the Black Woods Restaurant. The Commission was generally
supportive of Jolmson's efforts but gave October as the deadline for establishment of a
plan. Brad Johnson was not able to produce the redevelopment plan ideas for review by
the Parks Commission in October and, in turn, the Parks Commission recommended to
the City Council that the City move forward with the plans for the park along with
development of the lift station. Specifically, the Parks Commission requests that the
original improvement plan for East and West Bridge" Park should resume by continuing
the schedule for relocating the lift station and sewer system, adding diagonal parking
along Walnut Street, construction of the retaining walls from the bridge along East and
West River Street, and adding an irrigation system. Subsequent to this action by the
Parks Commission, the developer has been able to prepare some concept plans for the
area, which he plans on reviewing with the HRA and the City Council at the meeting on
November 9. The City Council is asked to review the plans and consider whether or not
to proceed with park improvements or to delay improvements to the park area indefinitely
until redevelopment of the general area occurs.
John Simola indicated that the current lift station was built in 1960 and will need to be
replaced fairly soon. He noted that a delay of a few years will probably not create any
major problems; however, he is uncomfortable with the idea of delaying reconstruction of
the lift station indefinitely.
.
As you know, in discussion of the Black Woods project, there was some talk of the
developer purchasing land west of the park along the river and creating it for a portion of
West Bridge Park, which would become the site ofthe proposed restaurant. Obviously, it
would not make a lot of sense to make big investments in West Bridge Park if a portion
of the park might be used for the restaurant site.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1.
Authorize City staff to proceed with planning for the development of the lift
station and park improvements, which consists of the original improvement plan
for East and West Bridge Park of relocating the lift station and sewer systel)1,
adding diagonal parking along Walnut Street, construction of the retaining walls
from the bridge along East and West River Street, and adding an irrigation
system.
If Council gives this direction, staff will prepare a revised cost estimate for
improvements listed.
'1P
6
Council Agenda - 11/9/98
.
2.
Authorize staff to proceed with planning for the installation of the lift station but
hold furthcr development of the West Bridge Park area pending establishment of a
specific rcdevelopment site plan.
Under this alternative, we would go ahead with installation of the lift station. The
danger in this option is that even the lift station and the utility lines connecting the
station to existing lines could possibly interfere with future building locations.
3. Motion to table further action on investments in West Bridge Park and lift station
until redevelopment site planning is complete for the general area. Motion
includes directing Johnson back to the Parks Commission now that a sketch plan
has been prepared.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
.~
The Parks Commission recommends that the City move forward with development ofthe
park as proposed sometime ago. It is the view of the' City Administrator, however, to
delay further major investments in this area for a period of time pending HRAldeveloper
development of specific site plans and finance plans supporting redevelopment of the
general area. It would be regrettable to make significant investments in West Bridge Park
only to find out that we made a mistake in the location of retaining walls, buildings, lift
stations, etc. Perhaps it makes more sense to take the funds that were earmarked for this
park and apply them toward other parks that are also in need.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of previous meeting minutes.
.
~-
7
f]G
~}
,e
,
S
l
"
I',
'.
,~'
Council Minutes - 11/9/98
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS RECOMMENDED. Motion carried unanimously.
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion.
None.
7.
Public Hearing --Consideration of vacation of utility and drainage easements around
interior perimeter of Outlot A. Sandberg East subdivision.
Deputy City Administrator Jeff O'Neill reported that in order for the River Forest
subdivision to be recorded, the existing easements around the interior perimeter of
Outlot A, Sandberg East, must be vacated. The new River Forest plat will contain the
necessary replacement easements.
Mayor Fair opened the public hearing.
There being no comment from the public, the public hearing was closed.
i; A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO
APPROVE V ACA TION OF THE INTERIOR PERIMETER EASEMENTS AROUND
OUTLOT A, SANDBERG EAST. Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of a request for a conditional use permit for a commercial use in the PZM
district. and consideration of a conditional use permit for mixed use in the PZM district.
Applicant. Pat and Susie Townsend.
This item was added to the consent agenda as item sc.
Consideration of proceedinli with West Bridlie Park and lift station improvements.
Deputy City Administrator Jeff O'Neill reported that Council tabled consideration of
West Bridge Park and lift station improvements in July pending input from the Parks
Commission on redevelopment plan concepts that could potentially impact the proposed
park improvements. The Parks Commission was generally supportive of the concept for
the Black Woods Restaurant presented by Mr. Brad Johnson; however, they requested
that a plan be established by their October meeting date. Because a plan was not
produced by the October deadline, the Parks Commission recommended that the City
Council move forward with the improvements to East and West Bridge Park, including
relocation of the lift station and sewer system, diagonal parking along Walnut Street,
construction of retaining walls from the bridge along East and West River Street, and
installation of an irrigation system.
Subsequent to the recommendation by the Parks Commission, the developer was able to
prepare a concept plan for the area and requested that Council review the plans and
consider whether to proceed with park improvements or delay the improvements
Page 3
1R
..~.
i
I
..~.
,
.~ 10.
.f:
;!
Council Minutes - 11/9/98
indefinitely until redevelopment of the general area occurs. Jeff O'Neill also noted that
the Public Works Director indicated concern about delaying reconstruction of the lift
station indefinitely due to the age of the system.
Mr. Ron Erickson of KKE Architects, representing Mr. Brad Johnson of Lotus
Development, reviewed the concept plan for the West Bridge Park area, which would
include a 4.5 park with a trail along the river, 60-unit and 70-unit housing developments,
a restaurant. and ampitheater.
Mayor Fair questioned whether it was too late for reconstruction of the lift station this
year. City Engineer Bret Weiss responded that planning could take place during the
winter with construction in the spring; however, he suggested that the Council set a
deadline for March or early April in order to get an early start on the project in 1999.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO
TABLE ACTION ON WEST BRIDGE PARK IMPROVEMENTS AND RETURN THE ITEM
TO THE PARKS COMMISSION FOR REVIEW OF THE REDEVELOPMENT CONCEPT.
Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of a resolution awarding the sale of $515.000 in 0.0. Water System
Refunding Bonds. Series 1998B.
City Administrator Rick W olfsteller and Rusty Fifield of Ehlers & Associates reported
that a 6% interest rate was anticipated for the sale of the $515,000 0.0. Water System
Refunding Bonds. Five bids were received, with Norwest Investment Services, Inc.,
submitting the low bid at an interest rate of 3.9982%, which will save the City $34,358 in
reduced debt service. It was also reported that Moody's Investors Service assigned a
favorable rating of A3 to the refunding bonds.
Mr. Fifield also recommended that the $3 million 0.0. Improvement Bond sale be
postponed until the December 14 Council meeting since the total debt for the refunding
bonds, the $3 million G.O. improvement bonds, and the community center bonds would
exceed $10 million and would not be bank qualified, which would result in the City
paying 10-35 basis points in higher interest cost.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO
ADOPT A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF $515,000 IN G.O. WATER SYSTEM
REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1998B, TO NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 98-52.
Consideration of a resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of a ground lease
and a lease-purchase agreement. and approving and authorizing issuance of public proiect
revenue bonds and execution of related documents.
Mayor Bill Fair suggested that the Council table action on the ground lease and lease-
purchase agreement for the community center due to the HRA's action to reject the bids
Page 4
'15