Parks Commission Agenda Packet 12-16-1999
.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - PARKS COMMISSION
Thursday, December 16, 1999 - 4:30 p.m.
Members:
Larry Nolan, Earl Smith, Fran Fair, Rick Traver, Nancy McCaffrey
1. Call meeting to order.
2. Consideration of approving the minutes for the regular meeting November 18, 1999.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
4. Update on soccer field development
5. Goals for 2000.
A. West Bridge Park Improvements
6.
7.
. 8.
9.
to.
Entrance signs. v - M ""() - C nnc..P (YlO'"c9~ ')
Update on Community Center. - PI...., '~("I,.,.:IvVf
w ,,-.J... -
-
- :7.... elm./( -
Update on maintenance items.
Added items.
Adjourn
.-------
\
,
---
\
!
'\
'-.
/
~
\
1-..
. Ct;V!~~7:\\
1\ ~1)
.
.
.
.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - PARKS COMMISSION
Thursday, November 18, 1999 - 4:30 p.m.
Membcrs:
Council Liaison:
Staff Present:
Larry Nolan, Earl Smith, Fran Fair, Rick Traver, Nancy McCaffrey
Roger Carlson
Jeff O'Neill, Gregg Engle, Wanda Kraemcr
1. Call meeting to order.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Larry Nolan.
2. Consideration of approving the minutes for the regular meetinf!: October 21, 1999.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY EARL SMITH TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE
OCTOBER 21,1999 MEETING. Seconded by Fran Fair. Motion passed unanimously.
3.
Consideration of adding items to thc agenda.
There were three items added for discussion: Klein Farms 6th Development, entrance
signs to Monticello by the River Mill Development and improvements to West Bridge
Park.
4.
Update on soccer field development. - JefT O'Neill
Jeff O'Neill, Deputy City Administrator, informed the Commissioners that the school
was still researching the development of the soccer fields. A rough estimate of $54,000
was given for a project cost. After the school board meeting on November 17,1999 there
would be a more decisive decision on this project.
5. Discussion on the Park Dedication fees - Jeff O'Neill
JefIO'Neill, Deputy City Administrator, reported to the Commissioners on the current
park fees per their request at the October meeting. The current fees are $750 a lot for park
land and improvements and $200 per lot for pathway dedication. The Commissioners did
request a finance report each month on the amount in this account. It was discussed if the
fees should be increased in 2000. Mr. O'Neill did state that Steve Grittman, City Planner,
had recommended to not raise fees at this point because Monticello's park fees are high
compared to other cities in this area. The park fees were not the only increase on the
building permits this last year. Ifthere are too many increases in a short time it could
have a negative affect on development.
Page 1
.
.
.
6.
Parks Commission Minutes - 11/18/99
Update on maintenancc items. - Gregg Engle
Gregg Engle, Park Superintendent, reportcd on items completed by the parks department
ovcr the last month. They would be focusing on skating and hockey rinks as soon as thc
weather bccame coldcr. Mr. Engle would like the commission to discuss what goals had
been set and what had becn accomplished in 1999 at the next meeting. Mr. Engle did add
that the gazebo in Otter Creek Park had been built. Thc Monticello Rotary Club donated
money towards the purchase of the gazebo. The Rotary Club also had 13 peoplc help
with clean up on November 13.
7. Discussion on December mceting.
Wanda Kraemer, Administrative Assistant, reported to the Commissioners that it was not
known at this time if City Hall would be moved to the new location by the Deccmber
mecting and inquired if the Commissioners would like to meet in December or wait until
January. The Commissioners all agreed it would be important to meet in Deccmber and
they would watch the agenda for location.
8. Added items.
A.
Klein Farms 6th - Jeff O'Neill, Deputy City Administrator, reported that thc
Planning Report suggested the pathway between Lots 6 and Lots 7, Block 3, Klein
Farms 6th be deleted. The pathway was bctween two residential homes and can
create a privacy issuc. There were enough other ways to access the park that this
would not be a hardship for the neighborhood.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY EARL SMITH TO FOLLOW THE
SUGGESTION OF THE CITY PLANNER AND DELETE THE SECTION OF
PATHWAY BETWEEN LOTS 6 AND LOTS 7, BLOCK 3, OF KLEIN FARMS
6T11. Seconded by Nancy McCaffrey. Motion passed unanimously.
B.
The Commissioners discussed the possibilities of an entrance sign on the east side
of Monticello along County Road 75. RDI, the developers of River Mill, did have
a scction of their plat they wanted to dedicate to thc park. There was a possibility
of another small piece along County Road 75 for a sign. City StafT would
research this possibility. Thcre was further discussion on having an organization
adopt the sign and plant a Howcr garden around the sign.
C.
Bridge Park - Commissioner Smith requested the commission discuss
improvements for Bridge Park. Everyone agreed this should be a priority topic,
however, would like to wait until after the budget has bcen establishcd for 2000.
Page 2
.
.
.
Parks Commission Minutes - 11/18/99
Roger Carlson, council liaison, would discuss when the parking lot could be
removed and head-in parking constructed along Walnut St. with the Public Works
Director.
9.
Adiourn
A MOTION WAS MADE BY EARL SMITH AND SECONDED BY RICK TRAVER
TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Motion passed unanimously.
Wanda Kraemer/ Administrati ve Assistant
Page 3
.
.
.
Informational Item
by JefT O'Neill, Deputy City Administrator
December 13, 1999
This is an update on the status of the search for a site for a soccer field complex. Some months
ago the City Council reviewed a request by the Parks Commission to dedicate outlot A of
Country Club Manor for a soccer complex. The City Council acknowledged the need for field
space but directed staff to seek an alternative location.
During recent months, City staff has been exploring ideas for cooperating with NSP and Wright
County at a site near Montissippi Park as one option. We have also had discussions with the
School District Administration regarding developmcnt of field space in arcas at and adjacent to
the school campus.
Based on various factors reviewed by the Parks Commission, the focus has moved toward
working with the School District on developmcnt offield space. Factors pointing toward a
School/City cooperative effort include the following:
1.
Cost
An adequate amount of field spacc is avai1ablc already purchased and served with
utilities. Some parking is available. Field development will not require huge
investments in site grading or utility extensions.
2.
Dual use/Efficient use of Field Space
Cooperating with the School in development of additional soccer fields for use by
soccer in the summer will also yield addition socccr/football practice space for use
by the school in the fall.
3. Field proximity, centralization of fields.
The School District campus along with the East side frecway fields could support
up to 5 fields for soccer use in the summer time. There are also 4 softball/bascball
ficlds that could be used as soccer fields (2 fields) when needed for tournament
play.
The School District has acted to approve in concept an expenditure of $30,000+ for field
development contingent on the City kicking in its 1999 budget amount of $30,000.
-1-
y A
.
.
.
December 13, 1999
Page 2 of2
The Athletic Director is currently working with a surveyor in developing a precise inventory of
the school campus recreation areas. Once the survey is complete, City staff will be meeting with
the Athletic Director to determinc precise field locations and layout on the School campus. After
a preliminary plan has been prepared, it will be submitted to the School District and Parks
Commission/City Council for review. In addition to design issues, the plan will address thc
following via a cooperative agreement:
.I Maintenance/Joint Maintenance
.I Future field lighting
.I Expected seasonal shifts in field usage
.I Parking development and maintenance
.I Rcstroom/concession devclopment
This is written as an update to Council. Let us know if you think staff is not headed in the right
direction or if you have any reluctance to spend budgeted funds for this purpose, assuming that a
satisfaction cooperative agreement can be worked out.
Cc:
Parks Commission
Byron Olson
-2-