Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 12-12-2016
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, December 12, 2016 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING 5:45 p.m. Budget Academy Room Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault and Glen Posusta 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from November 28, 2016 (City Admin Review) • Special Meeting Minutes from November 28, 2016 (Utility Rate) • Regular Meeting Minutes from November 28, 2016 C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda D. Citizen Comments E. Public Service Announcements • City Holiday Hours • Christmas Tree Pick Up • Trailblazer Transit Public Meeting — December 21, 2016 F. Council Liaison Updates • Parks Commission • Planning Commission • BCOL • IEDC G. Department Updates • Update from Monticello Public Library 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires /departures C. Consideration of approving the sale /disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of approving setting a special City Council meeting for Tuesday, December 27, 2016 for approval of bills E. Consideration of approving the 2017 Schedule of Regular Council and Commission meetings F. Consideration of approving City Facility Business Hours for 2017 G. Consideration of approving a wine and 3.2 on -sale liquor licenses for the Asian Cafe' Sushi Grill, Inc. at 514 Pine Street H. Consideration of approving a contract with the Wright County Assessor's Office for 2018 -2019 assessing services I. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -090 accepting a cash donation from All Element Inc. of $5,120 for the purchase of Firemaxx Tools J. Consideration of approving the replacement of carpet /flooring in the Monticello Community Center childcare area, the gallery hallway, and the fitness are for a total cost of $44,054 K. Consideration of approving Resolution 2016 -091 calling for Redemption of outstanding General Obligation Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2008A for selected maturities L. Consideration of approving Resolution 2016 -067 approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT M. Consideration of approving a request for Conditional Use Permit for vehicle sales and rental, a request for Conditional Use Permit for auto repair minor, a request for Conditional Use Permit for open sales display, a request for Rezoning from B- 4 (Regional Business) to B -3 (Highway Business), and a request for variance for automobile repair minor beyond the front building line. Applicant: Larson Building Inc. N. Consideration of approving a request for amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5, Section 1 for amendment to regulations for Vehicle Sales and Rental in the B -4 (Regional Business) District and Chapter 5, Section 1 for regulations for Accessory Use Auto Repair — Minor in the B -4 (Regional Business District). Applicant: City of Monticello 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing — Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -092 establishing the final Tax Levy for 2017 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of adopting Ordinance No. 658 amending the City Fee Schedule for 2017 and adopting Summary Ordinance No. 658A for publication B. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -093 approving the 2017 City Budget C. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -094 accepting bids and awarding project for the TH 25/71h Street Intersection Improvements Project, City Project 15C004 D. Consideration of authorizing a Release and Settlement Agreement with the Church of St. Henry for $963,407 plus closing costs 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORSHOP MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, December 12, 2016 — 5:45 p.m. Academy Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Purpose of Workshop • Budget Review 3. Adj ournment 20JL7 FR 111 it :. , it [DD [BU[D [DECEMBER DDS, 7011 TiiisF.it' Action Special taxing districts (EDAs, HRAs, port authorities, etc.) must adopt any proposed property tax levy and certify the proposed levy to the county. (Regular meeting - September 12) At one meeting, the city council adopts the proposed property tax levy and announces the time and place of a future city council meeting at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed, prior to final budget and levy determination. This public input meeting must occur after Nov. 25 and must start at or after 6 p.m. The time and place of the public input meeting must be included in the minutes but newspaper publication of the minutes is not required. (Regular meeting - September 26) Cities must provide the county auditor with the following information: TThe time and place of the meeting at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed. (Again, meeting must occur after Nov. 24 and must not start before 6 p. m.) oA phone number that city tax payers may call if they have questions related to the auditor's property tax notice; this does not require listing a private phone number. TAn address where comments will be received by mail; this does not require listing a private address. County auditor prepares and sends parcels specific notices. City councils hold meeting to discuss the budget and property tax levy and, before a final determination, allows public input. (Regular meeting - December 12th) Cities must certify final property tax levy to the county auditor. 1:GKUTATIi16`3[• $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 Property Tax Leery History 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2017 ■ City Levy H RA Levy Schedule of Tax Capacity (Values and Rates) and Tax Tax Capacity Year Value 2001 $ 13, 641, 431 2002 $ 9,606,212 2003 $ 10, 344, 950 2004 $ 11,141, 052 2005 $ 11, 840, 000 2006 $ 13, 224,144 2007 $ 15, 257, 996 2008 $ 16,190, 597 2009 $ 16, 783, 843 2010 $ 16, 691, 266 2011 $ 16, 429, 431 2012 $ 15, 771, 688 2013 $ 18, 692, 762 2014 $ 18, 229, 025 2015 $ 23, 882, 689 2016 $ 25, 891, 898 2017 $ 27, 584, 038 Tax Capacity Rate 37.146 67.645 65.218 62.421 58.651 51.028 42.458 46.942 46.191 45.822 46.729 49.773 42.262 44.709 35.737 35.552 34.186 $ $ $ $ Tax TC Value TC Rate Levy Levy Change % Change % Change % 5,067,342 4.4% 2.4% 6.9% 6,498,079 -29.6% 82.1% 28.2% 6,782,018 7.7% -3.6% 4.4% 6,957,915 7.7% -4.3% 2.6% 6,957,915 6.3% -6.0% 0.0% 6,750,000 11.7% -13.0% -3.0% 6,500,000 15.4% -16.8% -3.7% 7,600,000 7,750,000 7,648,272 7,677,309 7,850,000 7,900,000 8,150, 000 8,535,000 9,205,000 9,430,000 6.1% 10.6% 3.7% -1.6% -0.6% -0.8% -1.6% 2.0% -4.0% 6.5% 18.5% -15.1% -2.5% 5.8% 31.0% -20.1% 8.4% -0.5% 6.5% „_ -3.8% 16.9% 2.0% -1.3% 0.4% 2.2% n r_ of $30 $25 $20 �+ c . o M $15 CL [a H $10 $5 Tax Capacity Values and Tax Capacity Rates $25.9M - 80.0 —*--Tax Capacity Value #Tax Capacity Rate 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 CL m 30.0 x H 20.0 10.0 0.0 R.vv Bv Ftj n c 2014 2015 2016 2017 Property Property Property Property % $$ Fund Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Change Change General Fund $ 5,497,000 $ 5,882,000 $ 6,177,000 $ 6,291,000 1.8% $ 114,000 MCC - Operating 350,000 358,000 364,000 372,000 2.2% 8,000 MCC - Debt 1,040,000 1,005,000 - - - -- - 2014 GO Judgment Bonds - - 544,000 536,929 -1.3% (7,071) 2015/16/17 Bonds* - - 550,000 660,288 20.1% 110,288 2005A/2011 A GO 1 B F 223,000 330,000 330,000 139,783 -57.6% (190, 217) 2007A GO I B F 540,000 420,000 420,000 610,000 45.2% 190,000 2008A GO Sewer Refund 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 0.0% - 2010A GO IBF - 40,000 40,000 40,000 0.0% - Total City Levy $8,150,000 $ 8, 535, 000 $8,925,000 $ 9,150, 000 2.5% $ 225,000 HRA Levy 280,000 280,000 0.0% $ - Total Levy $ 8,150,000 $ 8,535,000 $ 9,205,000 $ 9,430,000 2.4% $ 225,000 * Current and future debt Tax Base Changes 1. New construction valuation $10.7M 2. Xcel $34M 3. Residential market value adjustment 7.5% 4. I RET Apartments 1St collection year - 2018 5. Fleet Farm 1St collection year — 2019 6. Next TIF district decertification - 2017 Taxing District by % of Total Levy (Change over prior year) for 2017 School ( -4 %), 18% County (+3%),44% City ( +1 %), 38% :w 70.0 ra `0 60.0 s d 50.0 m W °y 40,0 C2 • 30.0 �v a �v 20.0 �v H 10.0 0,0 Kati 0o� '04 �a� � ©� ati© �,��. �ti� r- 'I Tax Capacity Rates by Taxing Authority tiA IV 160.0 140.0 120.0 rR M 100.0, •U —0— County so, o C —m— city V X Other 60.0 School Total Levy 40.0 rR M City Tax Rates City of South Haven City of Waverly City of Cokato City of Clearwater City of Howard.. City of Maple Lake City of Annandale City of Buffalo City of Rockford City of Montrose City of Dayton City of Delano City of Hanover City of Albertville City of Otsego City of St. Michael City of Monticello 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.D Becker Sherburne $ 5,852,701 $ 2015 $ City County City Net Levy LGA Levy + LGA Population Per Capita Becker Sherburne $ 5,852,701 $ - $ 5,852,701 4,707 $ Delano Wright $ 2,892,359 $ 208,621 $ 3,100,980 5,864 $ Albertville Wright $ 3,671,246 $ 901462 $ 3,761,708 7,317 $ Big Lake Sherburne $ 3,841,041 $ 538,948 $ 4,379,989 10,671 $ Rogers Hennepin $ 6,592,636 $ - $ 6,592,636 12,381 $ Monticello Wright $ 8,925,196 $ - $ 8,925,196 131311 $ Otsego Wright $ 5,020,143 $ 127,590 $ 5,147,733 15,472 $ Buffalo Wright $ 6,515,376 $ 724,949 $ 7,240,325 161033 $ Saint Michael Wright $ 5,563,696 $ 267,594 $ 5,831,290 17,081 $ Elk River Sherburne $ 10,171,831 $ 2651960 $ 10,437,791 231987 $ 1,243 529 514 410 532 671 333 452 341 435 C a.A•tWSliIliY.19f.Y6 Tax Levy, CPI and Population (2003-2017) $10 -1- $9 $8 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 p f,* o"' a 0' e e c$° lo"` If CPI Levy Actual Levy Population 11 �'10 lftip 15,000 12, 000 am . = m 0 R� x Year Actual Lev, 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 $ 6,782,018 $ 6,957,915 $ 6,957,915 $ 6,750,000 $6,500,000 $ 7,600,000 $ 7,750,000 $ 7,648,272 $ 7,667,309 $ 7,850,000 $ 7,900,000 $8,150,000 $8,535,000 $ 9,205,000 $ 9,430,000 Increase/ (uecrease) $ 283,939 $ 175,897 $ (207,915) $ (250,000) $ 1,100,000 $ 150,000 $ (101,728) $ 19,037 $ 182,691 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 385,000 $ 670,000 $ 225,000 Percent Change 4.4% 2.6% 0.0% -3.0% -3.7% 16.9% 2.0% -1.3% 0.2% 2.4% 0.6% 3.2% 4.7% 7.9% 2.4% Percent Levy with Per Capita CPI Diff CPI Levy Difference Tax 1.9% 2.5% $ 6,621,543 $ 160,475 $ 694 2.4% 0.2% $ 6,780,460 $ 177,455 $ 681 3.2% -3.2% $ 6,997,435 $ (39,520) $ 653 2.4% -5.4% $ 7,165,373 $ (415,373) $ 606 2.7% -6.4% $ 7,358,838 $ (858,838) $ 578 3.7% 13.2% $ 7,631,115 $ (31,115) $ 669 -0.6% 2.6% $ 7,585,329 $ 164,671 $ 675 2.0% -3.3% $ 7,737,035 $ (88,763) $ 665 3.2% -3.0% $ 7,984,620 $ (317,311) $ 601 2.0% 0.4% $ 8,144,313 $ (294,313) $ 611 1.4% -0.8% $ 8,258,333 $ (358,333) $ 612 1.5% 1.7% $ 8,382,208 $ (232,208) $ 627 -0.5% 5.2% $ 8,340,297 $ 194,703 $ 650 1.0% 6.9% $ 8,423,700 $ 781,300 $ 692 1.9% 0.5% $ 8,583,750 $ 846,250 $ 699 Power PIS Purer Pleat Estimated Market Value $800 $700 $600 $500 $x-00 $300 $200 $100 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Estimated Market Value $213,300,800 $377,028,900 $346,559,800 $597,753,900 $680,037,200 $714,047,000 $ 163, 728,100 $ (30, 469,100) $ 251,194,100 $ 82, 283, 300 $ 34, 009, 800 77% -8% 72% 14% 5% Wright County $ 1,853,668 $ 3,339,571 $ 3,011,952 $ 4,852,926 $ 5,436,218 $ 5,655,822 Change over prior year $ $ 1,485,903 $ (327,619) $ 1,840,974 $ 583,292 $ 219,604 Change over prior year % 80% -10% 61% 12% 4% City of Monticello Change over prior year $ Change over prior year % State General Change over prior year $ Change over prior year % Monticello ISD 882 Voter Approved Levy Other Local Levies Change over prior year $ Change over prior year % Monti HRA Special Taxing District $ 2,123,324 $ 3,186,799 $ 3,099,226 $ 4,272,386 $ 4,688,312 $ 4,737,273 Total $ $ 1,063,475 $ (87,573) $ 1,173,160 $ 415,926 $ 48,961 63,547 Change over prior year % 50% -6% -3% 11% 38% 10% 1% $ 46,851 $ 98,512 $ 96,501 $ 171,801 $ 90,961 $ 86,641 $ 51,662 $ (2,011) $ 75,300 $ (80, 840) $ (4,320) 110% -2% 78% -47% -5% $ 1,111,255 $ 1,833,117 $ 1,652,691 $ 487,289 $ 1,313,016 $ 1,839,885 $ 568,702 $ 936,387 $ 968,436 $ 3,242,456 $ 2,720,828 $ 1,995,333 $ 1,089,546 $ (148, 376) $ 1,108, 618 $ 304,099 $ (198, 626) 65% -5% 42% 8% -5% 147,024.00 144,952.00 $ 52,899 $ 45,847 $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $ 5,756,698 $ 9,440,232 $ 8,828,806 $ 13,026,858 $ 14,396,359 $ 14,459,906 Change over prior year $ $ 3,683,534 $ (611,426) $ 4,198,052 $ 1,369,501 $ 63,547 Change over prior year % 64% -6% 48% 11% 0% Power P $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 2012 Taxing Authority and Xcel 0— O--M onnoodo i dmv -.0+ 2013 2014 .' ;00" 0000 dooms 2015 — — — County —city Schoo 2016 2017 Kcal Pronertv te Authority city County Difference 2017 Property Tax $ 91430,000 $ 10, 924, 000 $ 134943000 Tax Diff. w/ Taxing Authority Rate County Wright County Rate 39.604 - City of Monticello 33.172 -6.432 City of St. Michael 37.484 -2.120 City of Otsego 37.973 -1.631 City of Hanover 51.928 12.324 City of Albertville 51.566 11.962 City of Delano 53.895 14.291 City of Montrose 55.141 15.537 City of Buffalo 59.604 20.000 City of Rockford 56.746 17.142 City of Dayton 39.604 0.000 City of Maple Lake 65.441 25.837 City of Annandale 63.884 24.280 City of Howard Lake 65.941 26.337 City of Clearwater 75.189 35.585 City of Cokato 80.740 41.136 City of Waverly 83.676 44.072 City of South Haven 148.770 109.166 Property Tara Levy (Proposed - 2017) Debt Service, 2,487,000, 26% HRA Levy, $280,000 , 3% MCC Operations, 372,000,4% General Fund, 6,291,000, 67% F)P.ht Service I P. $3,OOO,OOO $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 2013 2014 2010A Imp Debt Service Levy (2013 - 2027) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2011A Imp 2007A Imp. 2008 Sewer 2008A MCC ° 2014A AE 2015B SR &I 2016A SR &I Debt Service LP. $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 Debt Service levy (2013 - 2021) 2013 2014 2015 2016 ■ 2010A Imp 2011A Imp 0 2007A Imp, 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2008 Sewer 2008A MCC ■ 2014A AE 20156 SR &I 2016A SR &I 2017A Fallon 2018 Projects Ah1ATAh k_ y - r General Fund Revenues - 2017 r Property Taxes, 80% R Property Taxes ■ Franchise & Other Taxes ■ Licenses & Permits 0 Intergovernmental Revenues ■ Charges for Services All Other Ah1ATAh General Fund Expenditures - 2017 Capital Outlay 3% rsonnel Charges for Services Services 40% 48% P -.Supplies 9% Ah1ATAh General Fund Expenditures - 217 Recreation 14% Public Works 37% General Government 21% Public Safety 28% Ak1 �Al•Allllllk GENERAL FUND 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 % REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE Property Taxes $ 5,580,437 $ 5,507,285 $ 5,887,666 $ 6,177, 000 $ 6,177, 000 $ 6,291,000 1.8% Tax Increments - - - - - - - -- Franchise & Other Taxes 241,664 237,173 235,089 283,900 283,900 283,900 0.0% Licenses & Permits 331,136 378,809 460,834 338,900 338,900 379,400 12.0% Intergovernmental Revenues 373,482 321,891 355,729 301,177 301,177 306,440 1.7% Charges for Services 280,288 318,278 366,926 267,664 267,664 320,470 19.7% Fines & Forfeits 41,124 48,744 42,474 42,100 42,100 42,300 0.5% Special Assessments 22,351 22,808 1,330 300 300 300 0.0% Miscellaneous 117,863 330,858 318,071 184,959 184,959 178,190 -3.7% Operating Transfers - - - - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ 6,988,345 $ 7,165,846 $ 7,668,119 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,802,000 2.7% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Operating Transfers TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 2,589,353 $ 2,555,898 $ 2,624,076 $ 2,979,264 $ 2,979,264 $ 3,096,654 3.9% 520,346 534,655 502,030 662,900 662,900 730,225 10.2% 3,291,055 3,256,898 3,418,181 3,712,936 3,712,936 3,728,621 0.4% 59,535 108,900 171,082 240,900 240,900 246,500 2.3% 92,000 293,000 297,012 - - - - -- $ 6,552,289 $ 6,749,351 $ 7,012,381 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,802,000 2.7% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 3,478,507 $ 3,914,563 $ 4,331,058 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 436,056 416,495 655,738 - - - FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 3,914,563 $ 4,331,058 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 General Fund 1. Transit: - $35,000 2. Election: - $12,000 (offset by equipment) 3. Workers compensation increase: GF +$30,000; MCC +8,000 4. Wage Increase (step and market adjustment): GF +$1021000; MCC +$27,000 5. Health Insurance: GF +$12,000; MCC +$3,000 n u AlIk■ 'Alkr rAh COMMUNITY CENTER 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 % REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE Property Taxes $ 1,181, 335 $ 1,388,404 $ 1,363,000 $ 364,000 $ 364,000 $ 372,000 2.2% Licenses & Permits - - - - - - - -- Intergovernmental Revenues - - - - - - - -- ChargesforServices 1,279,363 1,312,825 1,395,963 1,387,110 1,387,110 1,470,400 6.0% Fines & Forfeits - - - - - - - -- Special Assessments - - - - - - - -- Miscellaneous 24,701 14,534 36,345 28,216 28,216 24,000 - 14.9% Operating Transfers 175,000 50,000 - - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ 2,660,399 $ 2,765,763 $ 2,795,308 $ 1,779,326 $ 1,779,326 $ 1,866,400 4.9% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Operating Transfers TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 969,868 $ 963,780 $ 1,007,862 $ 1,060,173 $ 1,060,173 $ 1,114, 844 5.2% 278,327 182,906 173,369 201,653 201,653 202,000 0.2% 368,035 409,453 396,411 447,500 447,500 502,556 12.3% 77,465 - - 70,000 70,000 47,000 -32.9% 875,000 1,040,000 1,029,046 - - - - -- $ 2,568,695 $ 2,596,139 $ 2,606,688 $ 1,779,326 $ 1,779,326 $ 1,866,400 4.9% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 179,500 $ 271,204 $ 440,828 $ 629,448 $ 629,448 $ 629,448 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 91,704 169,624 188,620 - - - FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 271,204 $ 440,828 $ 629,448 $ 629,448 $ 629,448 $ 629,448 CIP - Priority ➢ Priority I: Imperative (MUST -DO)- Projects that cannot reasonably be postponed in order to avoid harmful or otherwise undesirable consequences. ➢ Priority II: Essential (SHOULD -DO)- Projects that address clearly demonstrated needs or objectives. ➢ Priority III: Important (COULD -DO)- Projects that benefit the community but may be delayed without detrimental ects services. to basic Financial Management 1. Recurring expenditures should be offset by recurring revenues. 2. Conservatively estimate revenues and liberally estimate expenditures. 3. Always spend your most restrictive money first. ON I it I Market Value Est Net Tax Net Tax Difference ChangE $135,000 $391 $376 -$15 $145,125 $413 $22 5.6% $175,000 $546 $525 -$21 $188,125 $574 $28 5.1% $200,000 $643 $618 -$25 $215,000 $674 $31 4.8% $225,000 $740 $711 -$29 $241,875 $774 $34 4.6% $250,000 $836 $804 -$32 $268,750 $874 $38 4.5% $275,000 $933 $897 -$36 $295,625 $974 $41 4.4% $300,000 $1,030 $990 -$40 $322,500 $1,074 $44 4.3% Residential Estimated Market Value Homestead Exclusion Taxable Market Value Res. Homestead Class Rate Tax Capacity Tax Capcity Rate City Tax Owed 2016 2017 Tax Year Tax Year Change % $ 136,300 $ 154,800 $ 18,500 13.6% $ 25,000 $ 23,300 $ (1,700) -6.8% $ 111,300 $ 131,500 $ 20,200 18.1% 1.0% 1.0% $ 1,113 $ 1,315 $ 202.00 18.1% 34.471% 33.172% - 1.299% -3.8% $ 383.66 $ 436.21 $ 52.55 13.7% I n- i axat ion: -dent-al Resi 2016 2017 Residential Tax Year Tax Year Change % City $ 383.66 $ 436.21 $ 52.55 13.7% County 445.54 520.8 $ 75.26 16.9% School 472.08 542.17 $ 70.09 14.8% HRA 12.03 13.35 $ 1.32 11.0% Total Property Tax $ 1,313.31 $ 1,512.53 $ 199.22 15.2% 2016 2017 Commercial Tax Year Tax Year Change % Estimated Market Value $ 431,800 $ 431,800 $ - 0.0% Homestead Exclusion $ - $ - $ - 0.0% Taxable Market Value $ 431,800 $ 431,800 $ - 0.0% Commercial Class Rate: First $150,000 1.5% 1.5% Over $150,000 2.0% 2.0% Tax Capacity: First $150,000 $ 2,250 $ 2,250 $ - 0.0% Over $150,000 5,636 5,636 - 0.0% Total Tax Capacity $ 7,886 $ 7,886 $ - 0.0% Tax Capcity Rate 34.471% 33.172% - 1.299% -3.8% City Tax Owed $ 2,718.38 $ 2,615.94 $(102.44) -3.8% Commercial City County School State HRA Total Property Tax 2016 Tax Year $ 2,718.38 3,151.62 2,404.92 3,835.83 85.25 $12,196.00 • 2017 Tax Year Change % $ 2,615.94 $ (102.44) -3.8% 3,124.18 (27.44) -0.9% 2,197.42 (207.50) -8.6% 3,706.42 (129.41) -3.4% 80.04 (5.21) -6.1% $11,724.00 $(472.00) -3.9% Tax Change by Taxing Authority 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% oil III, 0.0% -5.01 047020 047050 001050 002150 002040 -10.0% -15.0% ■ City ■ County — School H RA ■ State Leadership Enabling is not Leading "The art of leadership is saying no, not saying yes. It is very easy to say yes." Tony Blair, former prime minister of United Kingdom Dijestions/Conce, Stop Tax Levy Comparison State wide: Cities = 5.2 %, Counties = 3.7% (Wrigh 4.7 %) Ab1 A TAh $10 $8 LA $6 g $4 $2 General Fund Revenues 2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ■ Property Taxes ■ Licenses & Permits All Other Preliminary City Levy Changes for CY 2017 November 17, 2016 CITY NAME COUNTY Pay 2016 Final Levy Pay 2017 Preliminary Levy $ Change % Change Levy Levy TOTALS 42, 755, 512 45, 772, 567 3,017,055 7.1% 3,779,235 107,995 2.9% ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY 3,671,240 ANNANDALE WRIGHT COUNTY 1,395,155 1,417,185 22,030 1.6% BUFFALO WRIGHT COUNTY 6,515,502 7,336,615 821,113 12.6% CLEARWATER WRIGHT COUNTY 956,060 999,852 43,792 4.6% COKATO WRIGHT COUNTY 1,204,962 1,309,049 104,087 8.6% DELANO WRIGHT COUNTY 2,892,368 3,099,254 206,886 7.2% HANOVER WRIGHT COUNTY 1,410,972 1,598,742 187,770 13.3% HOWARD LAKE WRIGHT COUNTY 771,511 830,000 58,489 7.6% MAPLE LAKE WRIGHT COUNTY 935,028 1,077,111 142,083 15.2% MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY 8,925,000 9,150,000 225,000 2.5% MONTROSE WRIGHT COUNTY 931,382 1,024,242 92,860 10.0% OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY 5,020,206 5,650,040 629,834 12.5% ROCKFORD WRIGHT COUNTY 1,588,107 1,617,253 29,146 1.8% SOUTH HAVEN WRIGHT COUNTY 119,984 141,581 21,597 18.0% ST MICHAEL WRIGHT COUNTY 5,563,694 5,845,350 281,656 5.1% WAVERLY WRIGHT COUNTY 854,341 897,058 42,717 5.0% Leadership Enabling is not Leading Unc+inln $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 0 City Property Tax on $175,,000 Home N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 O Q 0 0 0 0 0 F, Fs F3 F" F" Fs Fs N w � C n a) - 1 00 LD 0 F-I N LU -P Ul CTS SI NVI NIN $45,000 $40,000 $.35,000 $.30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 City Property Tax on 3M Commercial 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Fs F" F3 Fs F3 F3 � w 4:�- LM C) CO W 0 F- w 49 L r-1 �J Tax Supported Self Sustaining General Fund MCC Fund Self Sustaining Liclour Sewage Water DMV Other FiberNet Total As1 AIN WrAft Ster) Waae 2% 40,000 $ 8,000 7,000 3,000 3,000 4,000 14, 000 $ 79,000 $ Health 2% 391000 $ 97000 67000 47000 47000 31000 8,000 73,000 $ Total 71000 $ 861000 27000 191,000 11000 141000 17000 81000 17000 87000 1, 000 81 000 27000 243000 15,000 $ 167,000 Taxing District by Percentage of Levy 2015 School, 23.1% County, 40.9% City, 36.0% I. 9111116 Revenues 36,483 36,483 38,250 38,250 1,902 Animal Licenses $ 401 $ 585 $ 273 $ 440 $ 258 Animal Pemits - - 100 75 50 Boarding Fees 33,159 27,139 28,755 29,024 34,462 Impound Fines 205 85 145 225 400 1,076 1,246 1,084 1,060 836 274 Total 33,765 27,809 29,273 29,764 35,170 Expenditures Animal control services Operating supplies Miscellaneous Professional Internal Services Travel Expenses LPV Insurance Electric Water /Sewer Gas Repairs & Maintenance Total 36,483 36,483 36,483 38,250 38,250 1,902 2,876 3,795 3,363 3,273 1,010 1,000 900 220 488 1,242 1,218 500 356 659 1,110 1,452 1,254 1,339 1,982 1,244 1,056 1,076 1,246 1,084 1,060 836 274 379 625 556 498 947 1,004 713 1,038 1,153 518 170 4,240 44,561 45,829 49,595 47,426 48,195 Net $(10,796) $(18,020) $(20,322) $(17,662) $(13,025 I. 9111116 Animal Control Entity Boardings Charges Otsego 76 $ 10,260 Monticello* 60 $ 400 Albertville 34 $ 4,590 Dayton 33 $ 4,455 Rogers 30 $ 4,050 Big Lake Twp 28 $ 3,780 St. Michael 28 $ 3,780 Becker Twp 20 $ 2,742 Big Lake City 11 $ 1,485 Becker City 2 $ 270 Hanover 1 $ 135 Total 323 $ 35,947 Leadership Adopted it Recommended 4 Requested Firsts Revisited � Bond Default ($26.4m) and Settlement ($5.75m) 7 Combined Debt Service Fund (Transfers /Loans) 3. Interfund Loans ($6m) 4. Fund Types (Impact, DMV, Cemetery) 5. Investment Horizon (20 -30yrs - $1 m MVA) 6. Prior Period Adjustment ($590k and $3.2m) 7 Lack of Institutional Control (Regained) 8. Declined Insurance on Bonds (A2) By the Numbers 01. $51925)667 2. $5)8211220 3. 774)002 4. $436)056 5. 2 E 1 1. 1/3 8. 0 SECTION 5. OTHER BUDGET AUTHORIZING ACTIONS: a. Establishes a revenue recovery policy for the community center where customer charges shall provide for 85% of operating costs and on -going capital and non - capital items, such as equipment acquisitions and repairs and maintenance. Setting CIP Priorities o Priority I: Imperative (MUST -DO)- Projects that cannot reasonably be postponed in order to avoid harmful or otherwise undesirable consequences. o Priority II: Essential (SHOULD -DO)- Projects that address clearly demonstrated needs or objectives. Priority III: Important (COULD -DO)- Projects that benefit the community but may be delayed without drimental effects to basic services Priority 1: Imperative o Corrects a condition dangerous to public health or safety v Satisfies a legal obligation (law, regulation, court order, contract) o Alleviates an emergency service disruption or deficiency oo Prevents irreparable damage to a valuable public facility Priority 2: Essential o Rehabilitates or replaces an obsolete public facility or attachment thereto v Stimulates economic growth and private capital investment o Reduces future operating and maintenance COStS oo Leverages available State or Federal funding Priority 3: Important o Provides a new or expanded level of service v Promotes intergovernmental cooperation o Reduces energy consumption o Enhances cultural or natural resources Firsts Revisited 0�1. Bond Default — Settlement 2. Combined Debt Service Fund - Transfers /Loans s. Interfund Loans —None for last two years 4. Impact Funds —Water and sewage closed 5. Investment Horizon — Market value adjust E Prior Period Adjustment —Again in 2013 Great Organizations A Relentless Culture of Discipline: • Disciplined people engaged in • Disciplined thought who take no Disciplined action. Jim Collins, Good to Great and the Social Sectors Questions /Concerns? Capital Items Hunters Crossing Park = $85,000 Fallon Pathway = $85,000 Liquor checkout and shelves = $50,000 Liquor store parking lot replacement = $75,000 s. Rural outlying and intercity streets = $400,000 s. TH25 /CSAH 75 Intersection = $1,992,000 7. TH25/85th turn lanes and signal = $303,100 a. School Blvd &Trail = $550,000 Lack of Institutional Control No Budget for FiberNet Fund Credit Card Issues No Access to Billing System Vendor F)P.ht Service 2nd I F MCC Debt Service and Debt Levy $1,200,000 165,000 Added Levy $1,000,000 $800,000 $400,000 $200,000 ■ Debt Service Debt Levy 11, OL M AWN Levy Each House pay $1 E 0' 1 7*-AAM16, 1, , 4M 'WN Levy Each House pay $.83 E 0' 1 7*-AAM16, 1, 1- � r�� wj Levy 0 Each House pay $1.00 Budget is Policy @Policy is about Leadership and Stewardship. 67 Leadership o Leadership is a process of social .influence in which one person can enlist the aid and �11nvort the others in the accomplishment of a common task. Stewardship o Stewardship is carefully and responsibly managing the economic assets entrusted to our care. Capital Items 1. ThStreet = $1,544,800 2. Treatment Plant Improvements = $6,100,000 s. West -East Bridge Lighting = $70,000 a Liquor Checkout and Shelves = $50,000 5. Water /Wastewater SCADA = $150,000 o. Water /Wastewater System = $300,000 7. Bertram Land = $550,000 a. Pathway Maintenance = $50,000 Q Battery Backup Traffic Signal = $70,000 7th Street Extension Preliminary Opinion of Estimated Costs: Street and Pathway (1,400 LF) $549,000 Storm Sewer $154,000 Sanitary Sewer $ 89,200 Watermain $181,600 Street Lights $ 96,300 Trees $ 15,000 Stormwater Pond Grading $159,700 Site Grading (15.6 Acres) $300,000 TOTAL $1,544,800 Challenge - 2 2005A G.O. Bond has $1.7M special assessments that are not being paid (Bowers - Chadwick). • Assessments were levied in 2010. • Annual Amount: $240,722 04=100M Year Amount 2013 $363,500 2014 362,870 2015 361, 820 2016 361, 820 2017 50,600 2018 50,600 2019 502600 2020 502600 2021 502600 Tota 1 010 $1J033010 $1.1M Challenge - 4 Sanitary projected $677K. Sewer Access Fund is currently to have an 2013 ending balance of F)P.ht Service I P. $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 Debt Service Levy (2011- 2022) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2010A Imp. 2005A Imp 2007A Imp. 2008 Sewer 2008A MCC pr_ City of Monticello, Minnesota Schedule of Debt Levies Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2010A Imp. $ 52,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 2005A Imp $ 244,131 251,906 245,000 248,000 205,000 207,000 206,000 215,000 185,000 185,000 183,000 187,000 185,000 2007A Imp. $ 418,306 416,846 420,000 420,000 420,000 420,000 420,000 420,000 2008 Sewer $ 430,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2008A MCC $ 815,000 $ 890,000 875,000 1,037,000 1,001,000 Total 1,959,437 2,108,752 2,065,000 2,230,000 2,151,000 1,152,000 1,151,000 1,160,000 210,000 210,000 208,000 212,000 185,000 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, November 28, 2016 — 5 p.m. Academy Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta Absent: None Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Wayne Oberg and Matt Theisen Others: Tim Hennagir Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 5 p.m. 2. City Administrator Review Mayor Stumpf reviewed the purpose of the meeting is for Councilmembers to provide feedback the City Administrator to help him meet their expectations. Utilizing the review form provided, Mayor Stumpf asked each member of the City Council for comments and observations. Dialogue was generated in the areas of overall impressions of the City operation, leadership traits, professional skills and status, relations with the City Council, reporting, citizen and intergovernmental relations, staffing /City team, supervision and department management. Jeff O'Neill thanked members of Council for completing the worksheet and for offering additional feedback. 3. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes — November 28, 2016 Page 1 1 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, November 28, 2016 — 6 p.m. Academy Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta Absent: None Others: Jeff O'Neill, City department heads: Wayne Oberg, Angela Schumann, Rachel Leonard, Sarah Rathlisberger, and Matt Theisen 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 6 p.m. 2. Utility Rate Discussion Wayne Oberg gave a brief presentation outlining the Utility Rate structure which included information on a customer's base charge and a usage charge. This was described in terms of the new monthly billing system. Also discussed was moving from a usage measure of cubic feet to gallons. Following discussion on peak demand and Monticello's rate, Mr. Oberg also touched on payment methods. 3. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes — November 14, 2016 Page 1 REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, November 28, 2016 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, and Glen Posusta Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Brian Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. with a quorum present. The pledge of allegiance was recited. B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Regular Meeting Minutes from October 24, 2016 Charlotte Gabler moved approval of the October 24, 2016 regular meeting minutes. Lloyd Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. • Special Meeting Minutes from November 14, 2016 Tom Perrault moved approval of the November 14, 2016 special meeting minutes as amended. Charlotte Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. • Regular Meeting Minutes from November 14, 2016 Tom Perrault moved approval of the November 14, 2016 regular meeting minutes as amended. Glen Posusta seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda • None. D. Citizen Comments • None. E. Public Service Announcements • On December 3, 2016 there will be a visit with Santa & Around the World Holiday Celebration. City Council Minutes — November 28, 2016 Page 1 1 5 • Visit with Santa at the Monticello Public Library on December 10, 2016. F. Council Liaison Updates • WCAT — City Administrator Jeff O'Neill provided an update. WCAT has submitted a one -year notice to withdraw from the Trailblazer organization. There will be another organization set up to provide the service. • Highway 25 Coalition — Brian Stumpf noted that Becker Township has formally requested to join the coalition. • Tom Perrault noted that the Waste Water Treatment Facility improvements are being completed under budget. • Lloyd Hilgart mentioned a notification from the US Postal Service that they are looking at moving the post office. A public meeting has been planned. G. Department Updates • City Administrator Jeff O'Neill provided an update on the following items: 1. There will be an Open House on December 8 at 6:30 p.m. on the 95th Street improvements. 2. An orientation schedule for new City Council members to meet with City staff is being drafted. 3. On December 1 there will be a recognition party for Tom Perrault and Glen Posusta for their years of service. 2. Consent Agenda 1w, Lloyd Hilgart moved approval of the Consent Agenda excluding items D, F, G, I, and tabling Item E. Charlotte Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $918,166.95. B. Consideration of approving new hires /departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for MCC and parks. C. Consideration of approving the sale /disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: Approved the list as presented. D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -087 approving a contribution from TDS Telecom in the amount of $500 for the visit and pictures with Santa event. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. E. Consideration of approving replacement of carpet /flooring in the Monticello Community Center childcare area, the gallery hallway, and the fitness area for a City Council Minutes — November 28, 2016 Page 2 15 total cost of $44,054. Recommendation: Item was tabled to the December 12, 2016 City Council meeting. F. Consideration to approve a shut off policy for delinquent sprinkling meter accounts. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. G. Consideration to approve 2016 Operation Transfers. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. H. Consideration of approving the purchase of Neptune radio units for the Water Department. Recommendation: Approved the purchase of 650 Neptune reading units for a total cost of $69,641 with funding from the 2017 Water Department Meter and MXU budget. I. Consideration of approving a request for an amendment to the City of Monticello's Comprehensive Plan to re -guide subject parcel from "Urban Reserve" to "Places to Recreate ". Applicant: City of Monticello. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. Consideration of approving an assessment with Mosbart Properties LLC for the 2016 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 15CO01 and adopting Resolution. Recommendation: Approved the assessment agreement with Mosbart Properties, LLC for the 2016 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project 15CO01 and adopted Resolution 2016 -089 approving the assessment agreement. 2A. Consideration of items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -087 approving a contribution from TDS Telecom in the amount of $500 for the visit and pictures with Santa event. Brian Stumpf removed the item to recognize the contributor. Brian Stumpf moved approval of Resolution 2016 -087 approving a contribution from TDS Telecom in the amount of $500. Lloyd Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. F. Consideration of approving a shut off policy for delinquent sprinkling meter accounts. There was a question on the rate of the turn- on/turn-off fee. They are both $25. City Council Minutes — November 28, 2016 Page 3 1 5 Lloyd Hilgart moved approval of the shut off policy for delinquent sprinkling meter accounts. Charlotte Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. G. Consideration of approving the 2016 Operating Transfers. Tom Perrault removed the item because he does not support the items related to the Bertram Chain of Lakes (BCOL). Glen Posusta moved approval of the 2016 Operating Transfers. Lloyd Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -1; Tom Perrault voted against. I. Consideration of approving a request for an amendment to the City of Monticello's Comprehensive Plan to re -guide subject parcel from "Urban Reserve" to "Places to Recreate". Applicant: City of Monticello Tom Perrault removed the item because he does not support the use. He prefers that development take place in this area, perhaps development of homes. Charlotte Gabler moved to adopt Resolution 2016 -088 re- guiding the 27 -acre parcel as "Places to Recreate" consistent with the City's long term land use goals and objectives and based on finding in said resolution. Lloyd Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -1; Tom Perrault voted against. 4. Regular Business: A. Consideration of approving a letter of recommendation to the Wright CountX Board of Commissioners related to special assessments for tax - forfeit parcels 155- 163- 000010 and 155- 163 - 000020. Angela Schumann gave a brief overview and noted that these parcels went tax forfeit in 2016 due to unpaid utility bills. The Home Owners Association (HOA) has requested a waiver of interest and penalties on the delinquent amounts, which would reduce the amount owed. Staff's opinion is that the City recover all costs assigned to the parcels. Glen Posusta moved Alternative 1— to draft a letter to the Wright County Board of Commissioners requesting that parcels 155- 163 - 000010 and 155 -163- 000020 be removed from the list for general sale /auction and that as a condition of removal and sale to the Timber Ridge 3rd Addition Homeowner's Association, the HOA is allowed to pay the unpaid special assessments either in a three -year installment, including principal, processing, interest, and penalties and including a 6% interest rate on the new special assessment or as a lump sum, including principal, processing, interest, and penalties. Charlotte Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes — November 28, 2016 Page 4 1 5 B. Consideration to approve the Master Plan for the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park and accept the corresponding Feasibility Report. Angela Schumann introduced the item. Jason Amberg, WSB, reviewed the plan and the evolution of the design process. The master plan has been through a rigorous set of public and policy -maker reviews. The final concept was presented. Future plans include: adopt the master plan following the presentation; accumulate funds for design and implementation of Development Area 1; and accumulate funding for design and implementation of Development Area 2. Wayne Oberg added that buildout of the park would occur as funds become available. The Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council, Monticello Parks Commission, and Wright County Parks Commission have unanimously recommended the master plan's acceptance. A member of the public requested to speak. Joe Schneider, 10396 Baker Avenue NW, expressed his opposition to the development of the park. He questioned what had been done in regard to the study of environmental impact. Jason Amberg responded that all of the environmental impact studies have been completed. Lloyd Hilgart moved to approve the Master Plan for the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park and to accept the corresponding Feasibility Report dated November 9, 2019. Charlotte Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -1; Tom Perrault voted against. By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 7:21 p.m. Recorder: Approved: Jennifer Schreiber Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes — November 28, 2016 Page 5 1 5 City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 2A. Consideration of approving payment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $959,210.69. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 12/01/2016 - 12:06PM Batch: 00215.11.2016 - 215.11.2016 Xcel /CPE Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 4263 CAYAN Check Sequence: 1 227015 Equip non - return fee- to be refunded 500.00 11/30/2016 60949754- 424100 235500 (12,289) Transactions; (3) Genius Srv. Fee; $10C 1,950.08 11/30/2016 609 - 49754- 424100 Check Total: 2,450.08 Vendor: 1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 2 11/30/2016 5843395 -5 15.85 11/30/2016 217- 41990 - 438100 11/30/2016 5863599 -6 43.26 11/30/2016 101 - 42700 - 438100 11/30/2016 5806932 -5 15.85 11/30/2016 101 - 45201- 438100 11/30/2016 5821009 -5 30.87 11/30/2016 101 - 42200- 438100 11/30/2016 5799425 71.39 11/30/2016 101 - 43127 - 438100 11/30/2016 5799427 17.07 11/30/2016 101 - 43127 - 438100 11/30/2016 5820786 16.48 11/30/2016 101- 43127 - 438100 11/30/2016 5837384 66.70 11/30/2016 101 - 43127- 438100 11/30/2016 5864452 -7 184.21 11/30/2016 101 - 45501- 438100 11/30/2016 5788570 -9 42.59 11/30/2016 609 - 49754- 438100 11/30/2016 5804618 -6 15.85 11/30/2016 101 - 45201- 438100 11/30/2016 5768542 -2 130.37 11/30/2016 101 - 41940 - 438100 11/30/2016 5768542 -2 3,014.80 11/30/2016 226 - 45122- 438100 11/30/2016 5768542 -2 48.89 11/30/2016 101 - 45175- 438100 11/30/2016 5768542 -2 65.18 11/30/2016 101 - 42800 - 438100 11/30/2016 5828859 -8 15.85 11/30/2016 101 - 41940 - 438100 11/30/2016 8235331 -9 39.20 11/30/2016 101 - 41941- 438100 11/30/2016 8235333 -5 16.94 11/30/2016 101 - 41941 - 438100 11/30/2016 8000015233 -2 1,341.06 11/30/2016 602 - 49480 - 438100 Check Total: 5,192.41 Vendor: 4592 PETERSONS COMPANIES Check Sequence: 3 11/30/16 Refund Refund - this was paid twice: 10/17/16 & 11/3/11 105.00 11/30/2016 101- 43000 - 322320 Check Total: 105.00 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/01/2016 - 12:06 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 2405 WELLS FARGO - Monthly Charges /Returns Check Sequence: 4 November 2016 CC Return- FNM 485.00 11/30/2016 656- 00000 - 202099 November 2016 12/1 PR pd 11/30 269.64 11/30/2016 101 - 00000 - 155010 November 2016 Wells Fargo account interest earnings - 1,329.17 11/30/2016 101 - 00000 - 362110 November 2016 Wells Fargo account service charge 2,182.73 11/30/2016 101 - 41520- 443980 November 2016 MCC cc fees (WF- Front Desk) 1,042.75 11/30/2016 226 - 45122- 443980 November 2016 MCC cc fees (WF- Online) 10.36 11/30/2016 226 - 45122- 443980 November 2016 MCC cc fees (iAcess - Fmrs Mkt) 77.02 11/30/2016 226- 00000 - 220100 November 2016 Liquor Store CC Fees (WF) 5,959.49 11/30/2016 609 - 49754 - 443980 November 2016 City Hall CC Fees (WF) 128.99 11/30/2016 101 - 41520- 443980 November 2016 Utility CC Fees (Bluefin) 407.10 11/30/2016 601 - 49440 - 443980 November 2016 Utility CC Fees (Bluefin) 407.10 11/30/2016 602 - 49490 - 443980 November 2016 Utility CC Fees (AmEx) 2.42 11/30/2016 601 - 49440 - 443980 November 2016 Utility CC Fees (AmEx) 2.42 11/30/2016 602 - 49490 - 443980 November 2016 FiberNet CC Fees (WF) 938.62 11/30/2016 656- 49870 - 443980 November 2016 MCC Returns 11/15/16 44.00 11/30/2016 226 - 00000 - 115031 November 2016 MCC Returns 11/16/16 64.00 11/30/2016 226 - 00000 - 115031 November 2016 MCC Returns 11/16/16 165.00 11/30/2016 226- 00000 - 115031 Check Total: 10,857.47 Vendor: 1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 5 11/30/2016 51- 4400193 -4- 801 Broadway E 17.25 11/30/2016 101 - 43160 - 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6572904 -0 WWTP 12,457.55 11/30/2016 602 - 49480 - 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505906 -1 - Sewer 1,200.27 11/30/2016 602 - 49490 - 438100 11/30/2016 510395766 -0 - Pumphouse 405 Ramsey 2,679.56 11/30/2016 601 - 49440 - 438100 11/30/2016 51- 4271112 -2 - Library 869.77 11/30/2016 101 - 45501- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505907 -2- Parking Lot 91.52 11/30/2016 101 - 43120 - 438100 11/30/2016 ZZZNEP- IMPLEM - 51- 6505908 -3 -Civil Defer 17.55 11/30/2016 101 - 42500- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505909 -4 - DMV 314.77 11/30/2016 217 - 41990 - 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505910 -7 - Liquor Store 2,187.65 11/30/2016 609 - 49754- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505911 -8 - MCC 7,532.58 11/30/2016 226- 45122- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505911 -8 - City Hall 1,663.04 11/30/2016 101 - 41940- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505911 -8 - Senior Center 391.30 11/30/2016 101 - 45175- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505911 -8 - National Guard 195.65 11/30/2016 101 - 42800- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505912 -9 - Animal Shelter 86.20 11/30/2016 101 - 42700 - 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505913 -0 - Fire Station 450.35 11/30/2016 101 - 42200 - 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505914 -1 - Shop /Garage 1,501.25 11/30/2016 101 - 43127 - 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505915 -2 - Parks 517.00 11/30/2016 101 - 45201- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505915 -2 - Water - skating rink 27.18 11/30/2016 601 - 49440 - 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505915 -2 - NSP Ballfields Consc & Sec. Lil 89.43 11/30/2016 101 - 45203- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505915 -2 - NSP Ballfields Softball Assoc. 539.04 11/30/2016 101 - 45203- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505916 -3 - Street Llights 13,332.37 11/30/2016 101 - 43160 - 438100 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/01/2016 - 12:06 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 11/30/2016 51- 0371645 -4 - Swan Cam 19.11 11/30/2016 101 - 45201- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 7780310 -4 - Bldg Inspec Garage 32.35 11/30/2016 101 - 41940 - 438100 11/30/2016 51- 9069641 -8 - FNM Building 1,862.57 11/30/2016 656- 49877 - 438100 11/30/2016 51- 9391437 -3 - 118 W 6th ST Floors I & 2 198.86 11/30/2016 101 - 41941- 438100 11/30/2016 ZCULPS - EXPENS - 51- 0623082 -8 349 W Broa 18.49 11/30/2016 213 - 46522- 438100 11/30/2016 51- 6505907 -2 - Parking Lot- auto protective ligh 47.94 11/30/2016 101 - 43120 - 438100 Check Total: 48,340.60 Total for Check Run: 66,945.56 Total of Number of Checks: 5 The preceding list of bills payable was revie Date: 12/12/16 Approved by AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/01/2016 - 12:06 PM) Accounts Payable AUSCO DESIGN AND MARKETING Computer Check Proof List by Vendor Check Sequence: 4 2668 (11) shirts - Streets User: Debbie.Davidson 12/13/2016 101 - 43120 - 441700 Printed: 12/07/2016 - 1:45PM (7) jackets- Streets 63.00 Batch: 00202.12.2016 - 202.12.2016 AP 101 - 43120 - 441700 2668 (7) sweatshirts- Parks Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 2925 1ST LINE /LEEWES VENTURES LLC (5) Jackets - 1/2 Water 22.50 Check Sequence: 1 123310 Flavored Syrups for Concession 395.75 12/13/2016 22645127- 425410 Check Total: 395.75 12/13/2016 602- 49490 - 441700 Vendor: 1039 AQUA LOGIC INC (1) Jacket logo- M.R. 5.00 Check Sequence: 2 45645 Replaced Motor & Seal on Adult Spa Jet Pump 237.50 12/13/2016 226 - 45127- 441610 45646 Replace Wiper Board 721.07 12/13/2016 226- 45127- 441610 Check Total: 958.57 Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Check Sequence: 5 56429900 Check Sequence: 3 3142264 resale - beer 355.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 355.00 2.70 Vendor: 2886 AUSCO DESIGN AND MARKETING Check Sequence: 4 2668 (11) shirts - Streets 99.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43120 - 441700 2668 (7) jackets- Streets 63.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43120 - 441700 2668 (7) sweatshirts- Parks 54.00 12/13/2016 101 - 45201- 441700 2668 (5) Jackets - 1/2 Water 22.50 12/13/2016 601 - 49440 - 441700 2668 (5) Jackets - 1/2 Sewer 22.50 12/13/2016 602- 49490 - 441700 2668 (1) Jacket logo- M.R. 5.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43111- 443990 Check Total: 266.00 Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 5 56429900 resale - liquor 178.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 56429900 freight 2.70 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 56530800 freight 11.70 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 56530800 resale liquor 308.26 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 56530800 resale wine 128.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 95000800 resale - gift bags 90.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 95000800 freight 0.41 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 719.07 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 6 201467 resale - soda pop 103.20 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 201468 resale - beer 1,010.50 12/13/2016 609- 49750- 425200 204153 resale - soda pop 51.60 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 204153 resale -juice 32.80 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 204154 resale - beer 953.10 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 204748 resale - Pop, Gatorade, Water 353.30 12/13/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 Check Total: 2,504.50 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIF Check Sequence: 7 1080560025 resale - liquor 1,493.95 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1080560025 resale- wine 368.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 1080560025 resale - wine n/a 72.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1080560025 freight 27.37 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1080563206 resale - liquor 1,409.28 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1080563206 resale- wine 815.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 1080563206 freight 32.31 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 4,217.91 Vendor: 2890 BROTHERS FIRE PROTECTION CO Check Sequence: 8 18837 2016 Annual Sprinkler Inspection 325.00 12/13/2016 226- 45122- 431120 18838 2016 Annual Alarm Inspection- PW 175.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43127 - 431990 18860 2016 Annual Alarm Inspection 400.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 431120 Check Total: 900.00 Vendor: 3278 SHANNON BYE Check Sequence: 9 2016 Jut Plan Monticello Joint Planning Board- 2/10 - 8/10/2011 210.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41310 - 431990 Check Total: 210.00 Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Check Sequence: 10 2348 -000G 171 201645 - Camping World First Addition - Octobt 105.00 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 2348 -000G 171 ZZBCOL - BCOL Phase XI - October 2016 600.00 12/13/2016 229 - 45202- 431990 2348 -000G 171 Planning & Zoning - October 2016 75.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41910 - 430400 2348 -000G 171 General Legal - October 2016 1,200.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41610- 430400 2348 -IOOG 172 Planning & Zoning November 2016 75.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41910- 430400 2348 -10OG 172 201645 - Camping World - November 2016 150.00 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 2348 -IOOG 172 16DO02 - Mills Fleet Farm - November 2016 150.00 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2348 -100G 172 General Legal - November 2016 1,867.71 12/13/2016 101 - 41610- 430400 2348 -103G 111 FiberNet General - November 2016 150.00 12/13/2016 656- 49870 - 430400 2348 -125G 15 Church of St.Henry/Fallon Ave Improvements - ] 202.50 12/13/2016 101 - 41610 - 430400 2348 -141G 2 201645 - Camping World First Addition - Noven 998.00 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 Check Total: 5,573.21 Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC Check Sequence: 11 647691 resale - beer 176.50 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 176.50 Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 12 00077962 Monthly Tank Rental 45.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 431900 00980628 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (405 lbs) 107.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 421600 Check Total: 152.00 Vendor: 1973 CLIMATE MAKERS INC Check Sequence: 13 54234 Replace Heat Valve 879.88 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 440100 Check Total: 879.88 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 14 135751 resale - beer 24,163.10 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 135751 resale - beer n/a 41.90 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 135912 resale - beer 556.95 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 135912 resale - beer n/a 17.65 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 136116 resale - beer 20,256.02 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 136116 resale - beer n/a 158.40 12/13/2016 609- 49750- 425400 136259 resale - beer- correct inv. 136116 21.60 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 136271 resale - beer 134.80 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 136549 resale - beer credit -93.50 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 45,256.92 Vendor: 4233 DI -MAR CONSTRUCTION INC Check Sequence: 15 Voucher No 15 14C002 - PHOSPH - Voucher #15 173,429.26 12/13/2016 602 - 00000 - 165010 Voucher No 15 14C002 - DIGEST - Voucher #15 4,729.58 12/13/2016 602 - 00000 - 165010 Check Total: 178,158.84 Vendor: 2891 DISCOUNT POST & POLE Check Sequence: 16 51093 16C001- PRELIM- BCOL- (3) 5x6 -10' *Tax Ex( 63.00 12/13/2016 229 - 45202- 453011 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Check Total Vendor: 2273 Check Total: Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 433555 Stevens Hearing Ad# 622636 433556 City 133134 Amendment Hearing Ad# 622641 433557 Larson Building Hearing Ad# 622643 435658 Ad #619836 Great River- Home 4 Holiday 436109 Freds Auto Property PH Ad# 625774 12/1/2016 Check Total: Vendor: 2154 FEDERATED CO -OPS A -14712 Heating Fuel- Chls. Rd Gen.(116) gal; West Brid Check Total Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH 12/1/2016 City Hall Phone - December 2016 12/1/2016 MCC Phone - December 2016 12/1/2016 Ballfields Phone - December 2016 12/1/2016 DMV Phone - December 2016 12/1/2016 Hi Way Liquor Phone - December 2016 12/1/2016 Fire Hall Phone - December 2016 12/1/2016 Public Works Phone - December 2016 12/1/2016 Parks Phone - December 2016 12/1/2016 Prairie Center Phone - December 2016 12/1/2016 Sheriff Phone - December 2016 12/1/2016 City Hall Internet - December 2016 12/1/2016 MCC Internet - December 2016 12/1/2016 Ballfields Internet - December 2016 12/1/2016 DMV Internet - December 2016 12/1/2016 Hi Way Liquor Internet - December 2016 12/1/2016 Fire Hall Internet - December 2016 12/1/2016 Animal Shelter Internet - December 2016 12/1/2016 Public Works Internet - December 2016 12/1/2016 Sheriff Internet - December 2016 12/1/2016 City Hall Cable - December 2016 12/1/2016 MCC Cable - December 2016 12/1/2016 Data Hosting - December 2016 12/1/2016 Service Contract - December 2016 Check Total: AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 63.00 Check Sequence: 17 92.30 12/13/2016 101 - 41910 - 435100 110.76 12/13/2016 101 - 41910 - 435100 119.99 12/13/2016 101 - 41910 - 435100 20.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49754- 434990 73.84 12/13/2016 213 - 46301- 435100 416.89 Check Sequence: 18 491.25 12/13/2016 602 - 49490 - 421200 491.25 Check Sequence: 19 934.98 12/13/2016 702- 00000 - 432100 1,257.34 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 19.46 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 262.12 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 279.56 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 242.50 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 284.91 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 113.81 12/13/2016 702- 00000 - 432100 14.16 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 69.76 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 99.95 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 10.00 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 10.00 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 41.95 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 41.95 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 41.95 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 29.95 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 69.95 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 41.95 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 12.30 12/13/2016 101 - 41310- 431990 125.14 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 432500 500.00 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 431900 250.00 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 431900 4,753.69 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 1195 AL GAPINSKI Check Sequence: 20 12 -6 -16 reimburse boots 2016 Al.G. 90.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43127 - 420650 Check Total: 90.00 Vendor: 1859 GODFATHER'S EXTERMINATING INC Check Sequence: 21 116285 Pest Control - 11/21/16 - Mice 50.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41941 - 431990 116311 Pest Control - 11/21/16 - Spot Spray - Ants 80.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 431900 116312 Pest Control - 11/21/16 - Spot Spray - Ants 35.00 12/13/2016 217 - 41990 - 431990 116313 Pest Control - 11/21/16 - Spot Spray - Ants 50.00 12/13/2016 101 - 45501- 431990 Check Total: 215.00 Vendor: 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 22 6110576 (133) tickets Nov. 2016- 1/2 FNM 89.78 12/13/2016 656- 49877 - 432770 6110576 (133) tickets Nov. 2016- 1/2 Water 89.77 12/13/2016 601 - 49440 - 432770 Check Total: 179.55 Vendor: 1199 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSO( Check Sequence: 23 0124003 Membership Renewal 2 /1/17 - 1/31/18 WO #30( 190.00 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 155010 0124003 Membership Renewal 2 /1/17 - 1/31/18 SR #3001 150.00 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 155010 Check Total: 340.00 Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC Check Sequence: 24 3987759 (11) #150 cyl chlorine; (205) gal Hydro Acid; (8 10,675.54 12/13/2016 601- 49440 - 421600 3987960 Pool Chemicals 1,124.75 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 421600 Check Total: 11,800.29 Vendor: 1224 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD Check Sequence: 25 G474045 MJ 22 -1/2 Epoxy; Rstr F /DI pipe; (2) gasket; (1 228.53 12/13/2016 601 - 49440 - 422700 Check Total: 228.53 Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC Check Sequence: 26 863714 resale - beer 509.50 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 509.50 Vendor: 1242 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE Check Sequence: 27 11182016 10/23- 11/13/2016 Fire Acct 1400-017-223-399 177.63 12/13/2016 101 - 42200- 421200 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Check Total: 177.63 Vendor: 2008 BRETT HOLKER Check Sequence: 28 2016 Jut Plan Monticello Joint Planning Board- 2/10 - 8/10/2016 175.00 12/13/2016 101- 41310 - 431990 Check Total: 175.00 Vendor: 4599 BOB IDZIOREK Check Sequence: 29 2016 Jnt Plan Monticello Joint Planning Board- (1) meeting 3/1 35.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41310- 431990 Check Total: 35.00 Vendor: 3971 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGINEERS LOCAL Check Sequence: 30 Jan 2017 January Health Insurance - Union 14,430.00 12/13/2016 101- 00000 - 217061 Jan 2017 January Health Insurance 48,750.00 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 217061 Check Total: 63,180.00 Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING Check Sequence: 31 2605096 resale - beer 860.39 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 2605096 freight 3.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2605125 resale - beer 2,134.23 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 2605125 resale - beer n/a 21.50 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 2605125 resale - beer n/a 3.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 3,022.12 Vendor: 2018 JOHNS WELDING LLC Check Sequence: 32 2494 (24) 6ft Picnic Table Frame Galv. 12ga. 1.66 OD 2,763.00 12/13/2016 101 - 45203- 421990 Check Total: 2,763.00 Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Check Sequence: 33 5592860 freight 43.20 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5592860 resale - liquor 3,059.93 12/13/2016 609- 49750- 425100 5592861 resale - wine 3,592.93 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5592861 freight 92.89 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5592862 resale - beer 21.99 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 5594433 resale - liquor 605.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5594433 freight 7.20 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5596316 resale - liquor 2,617.46 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5596316 freight 30.24 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5596317 freight 125.30 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 5596317 resale- wine 3,296.50 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5596317 resale - mix 41.35 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 5596318 resale - beer 87.96 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 5597663 freight 108.83 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5597663 resale - liquor 9,343.91 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5597664 resale - wine 2,764.80 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5597664 resale - wine n/a 30.25 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 5597664 freight 76.32 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5600309 freight 92.60 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5600309 resale - liquor 6,323.76 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5600310 resale- wine 528.05 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5600310 resale - wine n/a 30.25 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 5600310 freight 7.20 12/13/2016 609- 49750- 433300 600979 resale - wine credit inv 5584404 -13.15 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 602518 freight -1.08 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 602518 resale wine credit -42.03 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 602709 resale liquor credit -84.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 602709 freight credit -1.44 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 602710 resale liquor credit - 251.70 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 602711 resale liquor credit - 226.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 602711 freight -3.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 32,305.52 Vendor: 2641 JOHNSON MATERIALS INC Check Sequence: 34 2671 (7.66) Tons - CL5 Base 42.90 12/13/2016 101 - 43120- 422400 Check Total: 42.90 Vendor: 1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED Check Sequence: 35 MN190 -00101 General EDA Matters - Through 10/31/16 304.00 12/13/2016 213 - 46301 - 430400 MN325 -00031 Conveyance of Fred's Auto Property - Through 1 760.50 12/13/2016 213 - 46301- 430400 MN325 -00032 Sale of 413 4th St W - Through 10/31/16 1,804.28 12/13/2016 213 - 46301 - 430400 Check Total: 2,868.78 Vendor: 2009 NANCY KOPFF Check Sequence: 36 2016 Jut Plan Monticello Joint Planning Board- Secretary (5) n 375.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41310- 431990 Check Total: 375.00 Vendor: 2626 HARRY LANTTO Check Sequence: 37 11/29/2016 Planning Commission Meeting Recording IVIA 120.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41910 - 431990 11/29/2016 EDA Meeting Recording 11 /9/16 60.00 12/13/2016 213 - 46301- 431990 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 11/29/2016 City Council Meeting Recording 11/14/16 & l l/: 120.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41110 - 431990 Check Total: 300.00 Vendor: 1291 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Check Sequence: 38 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10110115 - 10/10/16 6.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41110 - 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10110115 - 10/10/16 36.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41310 - 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10110115 - 10/10/16 47.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41520- 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10110115 - 10/10/16 12.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41800- 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10110115 - 10/10/16 17.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41910 - 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10110115 - 10/10/16 13.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41940 - 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 836.00 12/13/2016 101 - 42200 - 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 46.00 12/13/2016 101 - 42400- 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10110115 - 10/10/16 41.00 12/13/2016 101-43110- 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 637.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43120 - 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 199.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43125- 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 70.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43127 - 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 36.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43130 - 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 326.00 12/13/2016 101 - 45201- 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 26.00 12/13/2016 101 - 46102 - 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 42.00 12/13/2016 217 - 41990 - 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 588.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 202.00 12/13/2016 601- 49440 - 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 204.00 12/13/2016 602 - 49490- 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 265.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49754- 415100 33425 Work Comp Ins Final Audit 10/10/15 - 10/10/16 238.00 12/13/2016 656 - 49877 - 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 37.50 12/13/2016 101 - 41110- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 216.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41310- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 88.50 12/13/2016 101 - 41310 - 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 362.25 12/13/2016 101 - 41520- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 96.50 12/13/2016 101 - 41800 - 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 135.25 12/13/2016 101 - 41910- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 156.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41940- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 7,150.50 12/13/2016 101 - 42200 - 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 252.00 12/13/2016 101 - 42400 - 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 373.50 12/13/2016 101 - 43110- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 990.75 12/13/2016 101 - 43115- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 5,376.75 12/13/2016 101 - 43120 - 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 1,723.75 12/13/2016 101 - 43125- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 472.50 12/13/2016 101 - 43127 - 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 288.25 12/13/2016 101 - 43130- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 2,852.00 12/13/2016 101 - 45201- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 234.00 12/13/2016 101 - 46102 - 415100 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 62,418.00 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 155020 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 80.50 12/13/2016 213 - 46301- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 241.50 12/13/2016 213 - 00000 - 155020 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 961.50 12/13/2016 217 - 00000 - 155020 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 320.50 12/13/2016 217 - 41990 - 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 5,289.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 15,867.00 12/13/2016 226 - 00000 - 155020 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 1,766.00 12/13/2016 601 - 49440 - 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 5,298.00 12/13/2016 601 - 00000 - 155020 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 1,770.25 12/13/2016 602 - 49490 - 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 5,310.75 12/13/2016 602 - 00000 - 155020 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 2,333.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49754- 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 6,999.00 12/13/2016 609- 00000 - 155020 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 75.00 12/13/2016 656- 49870 - 415100 33451 Work Comp Ins Prem 10/10/16 - 10/10/17 225.00 12/13/2016 656- 00000 - 155020 Check Total: 133,648.00 Vendor: 3550 RACHEL LEONARD Check Sequence: 39 12/1/2016 Mileage Reimb - Cable Commission Meeting in 23.76 12/13/2016 101 - 41310- 433100 Check Total: 23.76 Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 40 189 resale - beer 168.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 168.00 Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP Check Sequence: 41 227575 resale - cigarettes; marg. salt; juice 676.22 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 227575 resale - tobacco; soda pop; flasks; wine bags 201.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 228346 resale - tobacco; soda pop; beer cup sleeve; flask 802.20 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 228346 resale - cigarettes; 176.95 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 Check Total: 1,856.37 Vendor: 1386 M -R SIGN CO INC Check Sequence: 42 193572 (4) speed limit signs 239.15 12/13/2016 101 - 43120 - 422600 Check Total: 239.15 Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 43 20137590 (500) gal Unleaded @ $1.78 889.81 12/13/2016 101 - 43120 - 421200 20137591 (765) gal Diesel @ $2.02 1,542.99 12/13/2016 101 - 43120 - 421200 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Check Total: 2,432.80 Vendor: 1743 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 44 12/01/2016 Parking @ Rural Water Convention (3 Days) 16.80 12/13/2016 601 - 49440 - 433100 12/01/2016 Document Frames 9.65 12/13/2016 101 - 45201- 434990 Check Total: 26.45 Vendor: 1716 MONTICELLO TOWNSHIP Check Sequence: 45 12/7/2016 Annexation Tax per Agreement 538.81 12/13/2016 101- 41940 - 437100 Check Total: 538.81 Vendor: 2518 NEOFUNDS BYNEOPOST Check Sequence: 46 12/4/2016 Postage for Pkgs to Dept Public Safety - Nov 20 101.57 12/13/2016 217 - 41990- 432200 Check Total: 101.57 Vendor: 4490 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY : Check Sequence: 47 Pay Voucher 6 15C001 - Pay Voucher #6 - 2016 Street Reconstr 114,596.45 12/13/2016 400 - 43300 - 459011 Check Total: 114,596.45 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 48 22666 Nov 2016 - Tech Assistance - City Projects 1,208.66 12/13/2016 101 - 41910 - 431990 22667 201647 - Moon Motors Exp - Tech Assist - Nov 1,407.50 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 22667 201645 - Camping World - Tech Assist - Nov 20 1,255.50 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 22667 Nov 2016 - Tech Assist - Stevens Setback Varian 93.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41910- 431990 22668 Nov 2016 - Tech Assistance - Meetings 450.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41910- 431990 Check Total: 4,414.66 Vendor: 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC Check Sequence: 49 12555 (3) AC Fines mix 196.50 12/13/2016 101- 43120 - 422400 12564 (1) AC Fines mix 65.50 12/13/2016 101- 43120 - 422400 Check Total: 262.00 Vendor: 4040 TRACEY OTTO Check Sequence: 50 12/7/2015 Taught Spin Class 12/5/15- re -issue lost ck 20.00 12/15/2015 226 - 45127- 430120 Check Total: 20.00 Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 51 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 8571304 resale - wine 1,508.14 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 8571304 freight 18.75 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 8571475 freight 7.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 8571475 resale- wine 380.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 8571518 resale - liquor 200.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 8571518 freight 2.25 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 2,116.14 Vendor: 1424 TOM PERRAULT Check Sequence: 52 2016 Jnt Plan Monticello Joint Planning Board- 2/10 - 8/10/2011 210.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41310 - 431990 Check Total: 210.00 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 53 2077170 resale- wine 144.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 2077170 freight 1.44 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2078218 freight 92.53 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2078218 resale - liquor 6,501.22 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2078219 resale - liquor 2,112.30 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2078219 freight 51.85 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2080450 resale - liquor 2,188.45 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2080450 freight 28.80 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2080451 freight 17.28 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2080451 resale - wine 632.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 2081378 freight 20.16 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2081378 resale - liquor 1,878.29 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2081379 resale- wine 1,121.90 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 2081379 resale - mix 64.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 2081379 freight 25.92 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2083139 freight 31.67 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2083139 resale - liquor 3,670.51 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 251155 resale - wine credit inv. 2069763 - 112.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 251155 freight credit -1.44 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 251517 freight- credit inv. 2078218 -1.44 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 251517 resale - liquor credit inv 2078218 -79.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 Check Total: 18,388.44 Vendor: 1450 RAILROAD MANAGEMENT CO III LLC Check Sequence: 54 336909 License #301483 3/9/17 - 3/8/18 18" Storm Watt 194.55 12/13/2016 263 - 49200 - 431990 336910 License #301484 3/9/17 - 3/8/18 12" Storm Watt 194.55 12/13/2016 263 - 49200 - 431990 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 389.10 Vendor: 1452 RCB ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 55 8519 DBA Audio Comm.- (19) check units; (3) microl 1,105.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43127 - 431990 Check Total: 1,105.00 Vendor: 2584 RECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES INC Check Sequence: 56 165174 Recycle Bulbs - Various Types (437) 202.95 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 431990 Check Total: 202.95 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 57 587193 Cheese Sauce, Chips, Hot Dogs, Muffins, Pizzas 629.90 12/13/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 592884 Cheese Sauce, Chips, Fruit Snacks, Muffins, Ice 338.26 12/13/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 Check Total: 968.16 Vendor: 3279 SEAN RILEY Check Sequence: 58 2016 Jut Plan Monticello Joint Planning Board- Admin- 2/104 600.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41310 - 431990 2016 Jnt Plan Monticello Joint Planning Board- Travel (6) @ : 102.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41310- 431990 Check Total: 702.00 Vendor: 4598 ALEXANDRA SAL DANA Check Sequence: 59 11/22/2016 Yoga Class Instructor 11/7/16 & 11/22/16 40.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45127- 430130 Check Total: 40.00 Vendor: 1474 PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 60 12/6/2016 Mileage Reimbursement Nov (260 miles) 140.40 12/13/2016 101 - 42700 - 433100 12/6/2016 Cleaning Supplies 190.34 12/13/2016 101 - 42700 - 421990 Dec 1st Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 12/13/2016 101 - 42700 - 431200 Check Total: 1,924.49 Vendor: 3827 SAMBATEK INC Check Sequence: 61 08848 Code Updates: Project Admin Services thru 11 /1 312.50 12/13/2016 101 - 41910- 431990 Check Total: 312.50 Vendor: 2568 PATRICK A SAWATZKE Check Sequence: 62 2016 Jnt Plan Monticello Joint Planning Board 2/10 - 8/10/2016 210.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41310 - 431990 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Check Total: 210.00 Vendor: 4194 JENNIFER SCHREIBER Check Sequence: 63 12/05/2016 Mileage Reimb - Elections 47.52 12/13/2016 101 - 41410- 433100 Check Total: 47.52 Vendor: 2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC Check Sequence: 64 W5439828 11/12/16 - Cassandra Anderson R2290 140.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 431992 W5447863 11/19/16 - Reynods Recept R2216 140.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 431992 Check Total: 280.00 Vendor: 1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON Check Sequence: 65 965201 November 2016 cleaning Fire Hall 100.00 12/13/2016 101 - 42200 - 431990 Check Total: 100.00 Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS, Check Sequence: 66 1478933 resale - liquor 2,107.73 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1478933 freight 21.23 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1478934 freight 42.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1478934 resale- wine 2,040.68 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 1481514 resale - liquor 1,361.24 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1481514 freight 20.89 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1481515 freight 26.60 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1481515 resale - wine 1,224.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 Check Total: 6,844.37 Vendor: 3594 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT, LLC Check Sequence: 67 2759570 asst bags; paper plates; tri-fold towels; canliner; 380.70 12/13/2016 609 - 49754- 421990 Check Total: 380.70 Vendor: 2007 BRIAN STUMPF Check Sequence: 68 2016 Jut Plan Monticello Joint Planning Board - 2/10 - 8/10/201 210.00 12/13/2016 101- 41310 - 431990 Check Total: 210.00 Vendor: 1516 TASC Check Sequence: 69 IN922839 1/1/17 - 1/31/17 Admin Fees 77.01 12/13/2016 101 - 41800 - 413500 IN922839 1/1/17 - 1/31/17 Renewal Fees 164.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41800 - 413500 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Check Total: 241.01 Vendor: 4593 THE SIGN MAN OF MN INC Check Sequence: 70 8142 16C001- PRELIM- BCOL- 4x8 cut into 2 signs 400.00 12/13/2016 229 - 45202- 453011 Check Total: 400.00 Vendor: 1520 MATT THEISEN Check Sequence: 71 12012016 Sewer Collections Cert. Class SC- MT 23.00 12/13/2016 602 - 49490- 443700 Check Total: 23.00 Vendor: 1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 72 1172751 resale - beer 15,167.46 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1178913 resale - beer credit - 1,526.40 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1178914 resale - beer 18,717.60 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1178920 resale - beern/a 42.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1180215 resale - beer 9,792.96 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1183041 resale - beer 156.26 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1183042 resale - beer n/a 68.90 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 156 -78 resale - beer credit -38.80 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 42,379.98 Vendor: 1543 US BANK TRUST SERVICES Check Sequence: 73 4471251 G.O. Bonds 2015B Paying Agent Fee 11/1/16 - 1 450.00 12/13/2016 319 - 47000 - 462010 Check Total: 450.00 Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 74 1847572 resale - soda pop 389.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1851483 resale - soda pop 228.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 Check Total: 617.00 Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 75 167137 resale - liquor 453.67 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 167137 resale - beer n/a 120.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 167137 freight 18.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 167718 resale - liquor 513.63 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 167718 resale- wine 112.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 167718 resale - n/a beer 120.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 167718 freight 16.50 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Check Total: 1,353.80 Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC Check Sequence: 76 8062 Materials - Ballasts (2) & Recycle Lights 53.60 12/13/2016 101 - 45501- 440100 8062 Materials - Fan Kit for Pool 108.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45127- 441610 8062 Materials - LED Replacement Lamps (8) & Rec; 672.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 440100 8062 Labor - Fan for Pool 200.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45127- 441610 8062 Labor- Lights 350.00 12/13/2016 226 - 45122- 440100 Check Total: 1,383.60 Vendor: 2041 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE & SUPPLY H Check Sequence: 77 779462 #215- (4) 12x16.5/10 Galaxy Muddy Buddy ; (4; 876.92 12/13/2016 101 - 45201- 422200 Check Total: 876.92 Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 78 21439 resale- wine 800.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 21439 freight 16.50 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 816.50 Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 79 7109009 resale - wine credit 609.56 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 7109009 freight 5.76 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 710980 freight credit inv 7108400 -1.44 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 710980 resale - wine credit inv #7108400 -72.00 12/13/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 Check Total: 541.88 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR -TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 80 December December 2016 Deputies Contract 98,088.00 12/13/2016 101 - 42100 - 430500 Check Total: 98,088.00 Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER Check Sequence: 81 201600000101 1 00009 - Easement A# 1328456 46.00 12/13/2016 400 - 43300 - 459010 201600000101 ZHOGSP - Agreement Misc A #1328457 46.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41910 - 431990 201600000101 ZHOGSP - Agreement Misc A #1328458 46.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41910- 431990 201600000101 ZHOGSP - Agreement Misc A #1328459 46.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41910- 431990 201600000101 100009 - Quit Claim Deed A #1330064 46.00 12/13/2016 400 - 43300 - 459010 201600000101 Record Easement - Sunset Ponds A #1330618 46.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41910 - 431990 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 276.00 Vendor: 1611 WRIGHT COUNTY MAYORS ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 82 2016 Membership 2016 Annual Membership Dues 200.00 12/13/2016 101 - 41110 - 443300 Check Total: 200.00 Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 83 01160 -381 56 Standard Specification & Design Guidelines - 0 93.75 12/13/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 01494 -480 51 ZRCFOS - Fallen Overpass Prelim Design Phase 869.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 01494 -800 34 100009 - CSAH 75/TH25 Intersection Imp - Oci 808.50 12/13/2016 400 - 43300 - 459010 01494 -950 26 14C002 PHOSPH - Phosphorus Construction Ad 6,366.25 12/13/2016 602 - 00000 - 165010 01494 -950 26 14C002 DIGEST - Digesterer Construction Adm 5,446.25 12/13/2016 602 - 00000 - 165010 01494 -960 22 14C003- School Blvd Overlay & Trail Improvem 176.50 12/13/2016 400 - 43300 - 453010 01494 -970 18 14C003 - Fallon Ave & 85th St Improvement Ph. 42.50 12/13/2016 400 - 43300 - 453010 01627 -680 14 16D002 - Mills Fleet Farm Plan Review - Oct 2C 1,176.00 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 0167-99013 15C002 - 95th St NE Extension - Oct 2016 3,011.00 12/13/2016 400 - 43300 - 459012 02596 -010 22 2016 General Engineering Services Phase 3 - Oc 2,583.33 12/13/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 02596 -010 22 2016 General Engineering Services Phase 3 - Oc 2,583.34 12/13/2016 601 - 49440 - 430300 02596 -010 22 2016 General Engineering Services Phase 3 - Oc 2,583.33 12/13/2016 602 - 49490 - 430300 02596 -010 22 2016 General Engineering Services Phase 4 - Oc 1,911.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 02596 -040 19 GIS Support Services - Oct 2016 218.00 12/13/2016 702 - 00000 - 431990 02596 -100 17 15C001 CONSTR - 2016 Street Reconstruction 1 43,476.25 12/13/2016 400 - 43300 - 459011 02596 -110 16 ZZBCOL MASTER - BCOL Athletic Complex T 4,097.75 12/13/2016 229 - 45202- 431990 02596 -140 11 15C003 - 7th Street Retaining Wall - Oct 2016 315.25 12/13/2016 400 - 43300 - 459013 02596 -160 10 15C004 - 7th St /TH25 Intersection Improve Pha: 367.50 12/13/2016 400 - 43300- 459014 02596-2205 MMS Expansion New Application Spring 2017 155.75 12/13/2016 101 - 43111 - 430300 02596-2505 ZMISHS - School District PUD Plan Review - ( 2,206.50 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 02596-2605 16C002 - Spirit Hills Trail Improvements - Oct'. 453.50 12/13/2016 229 - 45202- 453910 02596 -30 13 2016 Maps -Oct 2016 218.00 12/13/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 02596-3104 FEMA Mapping Assistance - Oct 2016 1,587.50 12/13/2016 101 - 43111 - 430300 02596-3302 201642 - Wamert/Sherbume State Bank Plan Re 955.50 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 02596-3401 2016 - 2017 Market Matching - Oct 2016 700.00 12/13/2016 213- 46301- 431990 02596-3502 2016 -45 - Camping World Plan Review - Oct 20 1,603.50 12/13/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 02596-3601 16C003 - 2017 Street Improvements - Oct 2016 2,795.50 12/13/2016 400 - 43300 - 459016 Check Total: 86,801.25 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Total for Check Run: 892,265.13 Total of Number of Checks: 83 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and a Date: 12/12/2016 Approved by AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/07/2016 - 1:45 PM) City Council Agenda 12/12/16 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring /departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire /departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires /departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new /terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Evan Kako Slide Attendant MCC 11/21/2016 PT Taylor Krause Climbing Wall MCC 11/23/2016 PT Nora Kowalke Lifeguard MCC 11/28/2016 PT Lassana Moore Fitness Instructor MCC 12/1/2016 PT Tyler Lambert Streets Worker Streets 12/5/2016 Temporary Lloyd VanVleet Jr. Custodian MCC 12/5/2016 PT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day Class Katie Devries Involuntary MCC 11/20/16 PT Lucy Fearing Involuntary MCC 11/20/16 PT Kristen Shaw Voluntary MCC 11/20/16 PT New Hire and Terms City Council 2016: 12/8/2016 City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 2C. Consideration of approving sale or disposal of surplus property (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to declare certain items as surplus property and authorize the sale or disposal of those items. The Monticello Community Center is looking to sell various items. Al. Budget Impact: Varies by the value of the property. A2. Staff Work Load Impact: Depends on the value of the property. Some items will be shopped as salvage; other items may go to auction or sold via formal bids or informal bids. State contracting laws will govern in absence of city policy. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the sale or disposal of surplus property as recommended. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends Option 1 to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Surplus Property List Equipment /Supplies Surplus List Department MCC, 1. $100,000 + A. B. 2. $50,000 - $100,000 A. B. 3. $25,000.00 - $50,000.00 A. B. 4. $10,000 - $25,000 A. B. C. 5. $2,500 - $10,000 A. B. C. 6. $1,000 - $2,500 A. Lx- Pv e%% mo4k vx L B. O C. 7. $100 - $1,000 A. Cwel SP^ StA- B. POOL, -Ca.otlL C. 2-\ Toddlo, C.ho4 fs 8. $0 -$100 A. B. C. Date M 1 5 116 I t r f# 1 -1-71, r lop- Yh 1 AIIIQ I� b r 3 I �✓ Lw� M~ O hwMY TwMF DOL 1 reMnrMr'M l i l I `b .✓ ■- v .,,R M- 4 � M Y • - • � .,.'_a ..iii Y City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 2D. Consideration to call for a special meeting on December 27 for approval of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Since the City Council only meets once in December, a Special Council meeting has been held in the past to approve one last check run for the year. This last check run is necessary to pay vendors in a timely manner and to avoid interest charges, late fees, and/or penalties on bills received after the December meeting and due prior to the first meeting in January. This special meeting could be held at the start of the day or at the end of the day. The staff is recommending Monday, December 27th at 7:30 A.M. for this meeting. Al. Budget Impact: By holding a special meeting, this would avoid the City having to pay some interest or late fees on bills that would be received after the December 12th Council meeting and due prior to the first Council meeting in January. A2. Staff Workload Impact: None. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to call for a Special Council Meeting on Monday, December 27, 2016 at 7:30 A.M. for the purpose of approving bills. 2. Motion for other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City staff supports Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • None City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 2E. Consideration to approve the 2017 Regularly Scheduled Council and Commission meetings (JO /JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to approve the enclosed schedule for 2017 Regular Council and Commission meetings. This includes meetings for commissions and boards that exist by city ordinance or state statute. The schedule includes adjustments for holidays or other dates restricted by law. If approved, these dates and times will become the official meeting dates and times and will be made available to the public. Al. Budget Impact: NA A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff will post the schedule on the city's website and bulletin board after approval. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the 2017 Regularly Scheduled Council and Commission meetings as presented. 2. Motion to not approve the 2017 meeting schedule at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. According to Minnesota Statutes, City Council shall keep a schedule of its regular meeting dates, and times on file at city hall and available to the public. Rather than publish each individual meeting as it occurs, it is recommended to adopt regular meeting dates and times for Council and Commissions which is done with this schedule. The schedule will then be added to the city's website and official bulletin board. If there are any changes or special meetings which come up during the year, those would be posted according to the open meeting law. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Proposed 2017 Regularly Scheduled Council and Commission meeting calendar Draft Regularly Scheduled Meetings of Council and Appointed Commissions - 2017 Holiday Citv Industrial/ Planning Bertram Economic Council Economic Commission Chain of Lakes Development Q F 6:30PM Development Authoritv CITY ** Quarterly Review Committee 7AM 6PM Advisory 8AM 6PM -� AOr�t���10 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 Fire Relief Library Board Meeting 5:30PM 7PM * April 2017 PA- IIkeA M I �lO L�1&1&�V. 011N �01� rl� l�11 OVA VU II K!L�VJVKKV�01 LR X01 I:1 012 �LIA Lei I �lE L�IAIL�w�011V �01� rll 1 2 MCC Personnel Parks Advisory Board Committee 7AM Commission 4:30PM 9 :15AM March 2017 Fire Relief Library Board Meeting 5:30PM 7PM * April 2017 PA- IIkeA M I �lO L�1&1&�V. 011N �01� rl� l�11 OVA VU II K!L�VJVKKV�01 LR X01 I:1 012 �LIA Lei I �lE L�IAIL�w�011V �01� rll May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat September 2017 Siu>Mnn Tiip._�pLpd— Tht� Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ..,16 .. 22 13 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 126 27 28 29 130 26 31 28 29 30 September 2017 Siu>Mnn Tiip._�pLpd— Tht� Fri Sat October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 MENEM 1 2 1 2 3 MEMEEME 5 6 7 8 9 10 EMENEEN 12 13 14 15 16 17 EMEMEEM 19 20 21 22 23 24 MENEEME 26 27 28 29 30 29 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 30 24•k 31 25 26 27 28 29 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ** 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 29 30 Regularly scheduled meetings are sometimes rescheduled. Notice of meeting changes are posted 72 hours in advance on the Official City Government bulletin board in compliance with open meeting law. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20,.._. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 Regularly scheduled meetings are sometimes rescheduled. Notice of meeting changes are posted 72 hours in advance on the Official City Government bulletin board in compliance with open meeting law. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 29 20 21 22 23 24 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 Regularly scheduled meetings are sometimes rescheduled. Notice of meeting changes are posted 72 hours in advance on the Official City Government bulletin board in compliance with open meeting law. City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 2F. Consideration to approve City Facility Business Hours for 2017 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to review the attached table that identifies hours of operation and holiday schedule for each city facility serving the public. This schedule is reviewed annually for changes to be approved by Council. Some of the highlights are as follows: • Fibemet hours were removed because Arvig sets their own business hours. A link has been included to the Fibernet website so that residents can easily check business hours. • The Public Works union hours column was removed because the information is set in the union contract and does not affect the Public Works office hours that are open to the public. Al. Budget Impact: NA A2. Staff Workload Impact: NA B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the City Facility Business Hours schedule for 2017 as presented. 2. Motion to modify the hours of operation in soiree other manner. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Proposed City Facility Business Hours schedule for 2017 1 CITY OF �� Monticello 2017 SCHEDULE OF CITY FACILITY BUSINESS HOURS 2017 Standard Hours City Hall Public Works Office DMV Liquor Store MCC Monday - Friday / Summer Hours 8am - 4:30pm 7:30am - 4pm 8am - 4:30pm 9am - 10pm 5am - 10pm / rn - 9pm Saturday Closed Closed 8am - 12pm 9am - 10pm 7am -9pm Sunday / Summer Hours Closed Closed Closed Closed 7am - 8pm 2017 Holiday Hours Holiday falls on: City Hall Public Works Office DMV Liquor Store MCC New Year's Eve Sat 12/31/2016 Closed Closed Standard Standard Standard New Year's Day Sun 1/1/2017 Closed Closed Closed Closed Standard Day After New Year's Day Mon 1/2/2017 Closed Closed Standard Standard Standard Martin Luther King Day Mon 1/16/2017 Closed Closed Standard Standard Standard Presidents Day Mon 2/20/2017 Closed Closed Standard Standard Standard Easter Sunday Sun 4/16/2017 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Memorial Day Mon 5/29/2017 Closed Closed Closed 9am - 6pm 9am - 6pm Closed Closed Independence Day Tues 7/4/2017 Closed Closed Cle ,ed C, )sed Labor Day Mon 9/4/2017 Closed G isea Stan,'ar,, 9am - 6pm Closed Columbus Day Mon 10/10/2017 Standard Standard Standard Standard Day Before Veterans Day Fri 11/10/2017 Closed Closed Standard Standard Standard Veterans Day Sat 11/11/2017 Closed Closed Standard Standard Standard Thanksgiving Thu 11/23/2017 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Day After Thanksgiving Fri 11/24/2017 Closed Closed Standard Standard Standard Christmas Eve Sun 12/24/2017 Closed Closed Closed Closed 7 am - 2 pm Christmas Day Mon 12/25/2017 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed New Year's Eve Sun 12/31/2017 Standard Standard Closed Standard Standard New Year's Day Mon 1/1/2018 Closed Closed Closed 9am - 6pm Standard Policy: Modifications require City Council approval. Decisions to close facilities due to inclement weather (or other reasons) to be made by the City Administrator after consultation with the Department Head and Mayor. FiberNet Monticello hours are available at www. ioe iecnioirtocello.coiri. City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 2G. Consideration of approving an application for an On -Sale 3.2 Beer /malt liquor license and wine license for Asian Cafe Sushi Grill, INc. located at 514 Pine Street (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Asian Cafe Sushi Grill, Inc. has submitted applications for an On -Sale 3.2 Beer/Malt Liquor license and a wine license for the restaurant located at 514 Pine Street. The fee for a combination wine /3.2 beer on -sale is $500. Following approval of the City Council, the application will be forwarded to the State for licensing. Al. Budget Impact: Annual license fees cover cost of processing licenses. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time involved in processing application B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the applications for an On -Sale 3.2 Beer/Malt Liquor license and a wine license for the Asian Caf6 Sushi Grill, Inc. at 514 Pine Street. 2. Motion to deny approval of the 3.2 Beer/Malt Liquor license and/or the wine license application application C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. Kwik Trip, Inc. has submitted a completed application and a certificate of liquor liability insurance. The applicant has already completed a successful background check, the application will be forwarded to the state for licensing D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. License applications B. Liability Insurance Certificate Print Form Minnesota Department of Public Safety - Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division �i 444 Cedar Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 r - 500 Fax 651- 297 -5259 TTY 6 2r 55 651 -201 _ 7 APPLICATION FOR COUNTY /CITY ON -S LE WINE ICENSE Aicohal & Gambling Enforce, (Not to exceed 14% of alcohol by vo EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED. If a corporation, an officer shall execute this application. If a partnership, LLC, a partner shall execute this application. To apply for MN sales Tax # call 651- 296 -6181 Workers compensation insurance company name Policy Number _icensee's MN sales and Use Tax ID # Licensee's Federal Tax ID # p,pplicants Name (Business, Partnerships, Corporation Trade Name or DBA Business Phone Applicant's Home Phone ,Business Address Mon pity County State Zip Code . this application If a transfer, give name of former owner License Period To ❑X From New or a E] Transfer If a corporation, give name, title, address and date of birth of each officer. If a partnership, LLC, give name, address and date of birth of each partner. Partner /Officer Name and title Address DOB SSN SNP GLYt%''1 Partner /Officer Name and title Address DOB Partner /Officer Name and title Address DOB SSN Address DOB SSN Partner/Officer Name and title CORPORA'T'IONS Date of incorporation State of incorporation Certificate Number Is corporation authorized to do business in � � d ,el_ /� Minnesota? ❑X Yes ❑ No If a subsidiary of another corporation, give name and address of parent corporation BUILDING AND RESTAURANT Name of building owner Owner's address I �� 2 alY1 S-"t�� e4, M In-i"1 C-t'. 110,-AA ll) Z ! m, e C.i, es ;Are taxes delinquent Has the building owner any connection, direct Restaurant seating capacity Hours food will be available property the a licant? Yes X No '6 I•�+ -r rti Yes ® No o Indirect with pp ❑ ❑ ,� Number of restaurant employees Number of months per year restaurant is open Will food service be the principal business? 1 ❑X Yes ❑ No Describe the premises to be licensed If the restaurant is in conjunction with another bu iness (resort etc.), describe business NO LICENSE WILL BE APPROVED OR RELEASED UNTIL THE $20 RETAILER ID CARD FEE IS RECEIVED BY AGED i 2 d/ " et -u of ❑ Yes X No Has the applicant or associates been granted an on -sale malt Ilquor 0. ) an or a s p license in conjunction with this wine license? 00MU ►Z' ❑ Yes >C No ❑ Yes X No Is the applicant or any of the associates in this application a member of the county board or the city council, which will issue this license? If yes, in what capacity? (if the applicant is the spouse of a member of the governing body, or another family relationship exists, the member shall not vote on this application. During the past license year, has a summons been issued under the liquor civil liability (Dram Shop)(M.S. 340A.802). If Yes, attach copy of the summons. Has applicant, partners, officers or employees ever had any liquor law violations in Minnesota or elsewhere. If so, give names, dates, violations and final outcome details. Page 1 of 2 ❑X Yes (rj No Does any person other than the applicants, have any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures or equipment in the licensed premises? If yes, give names and details. ❑ X Yes R No Have the applicants any interests, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota? If yes, give name and address of establishment. I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ THE ABOVE QUESTIONS AND THAT THE ANSWERS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY ;KNOWLEDGE. Signature of Applicant Date The licensee must have one of the following: Liquor liability insurance (Dram Shop) $50,000 per person; $100,000 more than one person; $10,000 property destruction; $50,000 and $100,000 for loss of means of support. Attach "CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE" to this form. C A surety bond from a surety company with minimum coverage as specified above in. A certificate from the state treasurer that the licensee has deposited with the state, trust funds having a market value of $100,000 or $100,000 in cash or securities. IF LICENSE IS ISSUED BY THE COUNTY BOARD, REPORT OF COUNTY ATTORNEY ❑X Yes ❑ No I certify that to the best of my knowledge the applicants named above are eligible to be licensed. If no, state reason. Signature County Attorney County Date REPORT BY POLICE OR SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT j This is to certify that the applicant and the associates, named herein have not been convicted within the past five years for any violation of laws of the State of Minnesota, Municipal or County ordinances relating to intoxicating liquor, except as follows: Signature Department and Title IMPORTANT NOTICE Date ALL RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSEES MUST REGISTER WITH THE ALCOHOL, TOBACCO TAX AND TRADE BUREAU. FOR INFORMATION CALL 513 -684 -2979 OR 1 -800- 937 -8864 A $30.00 service charge will be added to all dishonored checks You may also be subjected to a civil penalty of $100.00 or 100 % of the value of the check, whichever is greater, plus interest and attorney fees. Page 2of2 `r Alcohol & Gambling Enlorcemem Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division (AGED) 444 Cedar Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 -5133 Telephone 651 -201 -7507 Fax 651- 297 -5259 TTY 651- 282 -6555 Certification of an On Sale Liquor License, 3.2% Liquor license, or Sunday Liquor License Cities and Counties: You are required by law to complete and sign this form to certify the issuance of the following liquor license types: 1) City issued on sale intoxicating and Sunday liquor licenses 2) City and County issued 3.2% on and off sale malt liquor licenses Name of City or County Issuing Liquor License Circle One: New License License Transfer License Period From: To: (former licensee name) License type: (circle all that apply) On Sale Intoxicating Fee(s): On Sale License fee:$ Sunday License fee: $ Licensee Name: ,��,� .�y��i� ��� �' - DOB (corporation, partnership, LLC, or Individual) Suspension Revocation Cancel (Give dates) Sunday Liquor C3.2'%)/, On sale 3.2% Off Sale 3.2% On Sale fee: $ 3.2% Off Sale fee: $ Social Security # Business Trade Narne IUA -UkSk (o-Ak Business Address S-14 pi ne 5'- City MVn+ ;CfA(; Zip Code ' County � �' ° Business Phone 7635— 212 °- OS- 0q Home Phone `a 7 A� —$?5 Io Home Address 4iA S -I+k 1\1 E City I y4iceb Licensee's MN Tax ID # 440S 15 S- (To Apply call 651- 296 -6181) Licensee's Federal Tax ID # `61 " I o -27145 (To apply call IRS 800 - 829 -4933) If above named licensee is a corporation, partnership, or LLC, complete the following for each partner /officer: 7�k n Ckvr\ 1.2c,: g6 vs l ' 3'� 7 r4 C, fVMn � 1 MW Partner /Officer Name (First Middle Last) DOB Social Security # Home Address AS30, (Partner /Officer Name (First Middle Last) DOB Social Security # Partner /Officer Name (First Middle Last) DOB Social Security # Home Address Home Address - Intoxicating liquor licensees must attach a certificate of Liquor Liability Insurance to this form. The insurance certificate � must c� ont n all of the following: 1) Show the exact licensee name (corporation, partnership, LLC, etc) and business address as shown on the license. 2) Cover completely the license period set by the local city or county licensing authority as shown on the license. Circle One: (Yes V During the past year has a summons been issued to the licensee under the Civil Liquor Liability Law? Workers Compensation Insurance is also required by all licensees: Please complete the following: Workers Compensation Insurance Company Name: s'-� �-�► �� Policy # I Certify that this license(s) has been approved in an official meeting by the governing body of the city or county. City Clerk or County Auditor Signature Date (title) On Sale Intoxicating liquor licensees must also purchase a $20 Retailer Buyers Card. To obtain the application for the Buyers Card, please call 651- 201 -7504, or visit our website at www.dps.state.mn.us. (Form 9011- 12/09) llka. .-- '? "� CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM /DD/YYYY) 11/18/2016 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER, IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER PINE INSURANCE AGENCY 1300 NORTHRIDGE DR NW PINE CITY MN 55063 CONTACT NAME: MICHAEL ANDERSON - -- - -- PHONE — FAX - A/C No . Ext ): 320 - 629 -2515 A/C, No). 320 - 629 -2517 -- E -MAIL MIKE @PINEAGENCY.US ADDRESS: _ _ INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER A: SCOBIE GROUP _ 41297 INSURED ASIAN CAFE SUSHI GRILL, INC _ INSURER B: EACH OCCURRENCE INSURER C: 514 PINE STREET INSURERD: MONTICELLO MN 55361 $ INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 20161118083155019 REVISION NHMRFR- THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF— MM /DD/YYYY T- POLICY EXP MM /DD /YYYY LIMITS COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE El OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES Ea occurrence $ MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- ❑ JECT LOC GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRODUCTS - COMP /OP AGG — $ $ OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT Ea accident $ !BODILY INJURY (Per person) _ $ ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BODILY INJURY Per accident BOOD ( ) $ HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY PROPERTY DAMAGE Per accident $ UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE DED RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION PER OTH- AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANYPROPRIETOR /PARTNER /EXECUTIVE OFFICER /MEMBEREXCLUDED? N/A STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT - -- $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE - $ (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below A LIQUOR LIABILITY N N LLMN111516 11/15/2016 11/15/2017 Each Occurrence $1,000,000 General Aggregate $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT STREET MONTICELLO MN 55362 Email: INFO @CI.MONTICELLO.MN.US SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ©1988 -2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 2H. Consideration of approving a contract with the Wright County Assessor's Office for 2018 -2019 assessing services (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The city currently contracts with the Wright County Assessor's office to perform assessing work for the city. Attached is a proposed contract covering services for the 2018 and 2019 property tax values. As a point of reference, the assessor is currently working on the 2017 property tax values, which are used for 2018 tax collections. The first payment on the new agreement is in June 2018. Under the proposed contract agreement, the city would pay $11.50 /parcel in 2018 (currently $10.50) and $12 /parcel 2019 for assessment services. New construction for all property types with an estimated construction value of $499,999 or less will be charged at $50 /parcel (up from $25); all property types $500,000 and greater will be charged at $150 /parcel (up from $100). Beginning with the attached contract, the county will also start charging for exempt, mobile home and personal property, which now total 756. The rate for these properties is the same: 2018 at $11.50 and 2019 at $12.00. The other options for the city would be: to try and negotiate a more favorable contract with Wright County, contract this service out with a private assessor or company, or to hire a city assessor as a city employee. Al. Budget Impact: The City paid Wright County $49,664 in 2013; $49,831.50 in 2014; $50,465.50 in 2015; $49,871.50 in 2016. Charges have been the same for the last six years. The estimated impact of the various rate increases using the latest invoice is $14,502. A2. Staff Impact: There is no staff impact if this contract is approved as is. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve a contract for assessing services with the Wright County Assessor for 2018 and 2019 services at the rates as proposed. 2. Motion to not approve a contract at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. The city has contracted with Wright County for a number of years and rates have been the same for at least the last six years. The city's working relationship with the County Assessor's Office is very good. Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Proposed Wright County Assessment Services Contract & Letter B. Assessor Contract Schedules 00TY p* Anthony P. Rasmuson 4? Wright County Assessor Wright County Government Center 2nd Street NW, Room 100 0 Buffalo, MN 55313 -1183 Phone: (763) 682 -7367 / (800) 362 -3667 (763) 684 -4553 www.co.wright.mn.us November 18, 2016 City of Monticello 505 Walnut St, Ste #1 Monticello, MN 55362 RE: 2018 and 2019 Assessment Services Agreement Dear City of Monticello, We would like to thank you for your continued support of the Wright County Assessor's Office. Please find the enclosed contract for the 2018 and 2019 assessment services. Also enclosed is a memo regarding new contract rates determined by the County Board in May 2016. The latest jurisdiction parcel totals are calculated at the bottom of the memo to help with your 2018 budget. We look forward to continuing to provide the best services possible to the cities and townships, it is my goal to provide you with a constant in professional service. The Wright County Assessor's Office is dedicated to providing property owners, local government and our communities with fair, equitable and accurate property assessments. We appreciate the relationship we have with the City of Monticello and we look forward to fostering and improving that relationship in the years to come. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this contract, please contact me by e -mail at tony.rasmuson(a,co.wright.mn.us or by phone at (763) 682 -7372 / 1- 800 - 362 -3667 ext. 7372. Sinc Antlivuy r. tcasmuson Wright County Assessor TO: Wright County Cities and Townships with County Assessment Contracts FROM: Tony Rasmuson, Wright County Assessor DATE: November 18, 2016 RE: New Contract rates determined by the Wright County Board Memo In May of 2016, the Wright County Board reviewed the costs associated with performing the assessment and the revenue received by the jurisdictions that employ the services of the Wright County Assessor's Office. Findings by the Board included: • The current deficit for the Assessor's Office is in excess of one million dollars. • Wright County has not increased this rate in more than ten years, even though costs to run the office have continued to increase annually in that time frame. • Our office will be replacing Xerox software that is antiquated and will no longer be supported by the company that is providing it to us — cost to the county to replace is in excess of $125,000. • Local assessors have been retiring, districts that were under contract with local assessors haven't been able to find replacements, requiring the County hire appraisers to perform the assessment for those districts. • Legislation has mandated that assessor's will have to be accredited within four years of hire, resulting in higher up front expenses for training. There are also increased requirements for continuing education for existing assessors required by legislation. Items ratified by the County Board (changes to the previous contract): In an effort to more equitably share costs, our office will be adjusting our rate for the 2018 assessment to $11.50 per parcel, and the 2019 assessment to $12 per parcel. Historically we have not charged for any exempt or personal property parcels even though the contract states all parcels. We will follow the language of the contract beginning with the 2018 assessment and beyond. For districts that issue their own building permits — • The charge for the assessment of a new construction /addition residential property will be $50 per new home /addition. The charge for the assessment of a new construction /addition of a commercial /industrial /apartment /exempt with a permit value of $499,999 and under will be $50 per new building /addition. The charge for the assessment of a new construction /addition of a commercial /industrial /apartment /exempt with a permit value $500,000 and over will be $150. For Budgeting purposes for 2018 your city /township (Monticello) currently has: 4633 taxable parcels _348_ exempt parcels 398 mobile home parcels _10_ personal property parcels ASSESSMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the County of Wright, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the City of Monticello a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "City /Township "; WHEREAS, said City /Township lies either wholly or partially within the County and constitutes a separate assessment district; and WHEREAS, under such circumstances the provision of the Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.072 and 471.59 permit the County Assessor to provide for the assessment of property; and WHEREAS, said City /Township desires the County to perform certain assessments on behalf of said City /Township; and WHEREAS, the County is willing to cooperate with said City /Township by completing the assessment in a proper manner; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein it is agreed as follows: 1. The County shall perform the 2018 and 2019 property assessment for the City /Township in accordance with the property assessment procedures and practices established and observed by the County, the validity and reasonableness of which are hereby acknowledged and approved by the City /Township. The property assessment by the County shall be composed of those assessment services which are set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. 2. All information, records, data, reports, and the like that are necessary to allow the County to carry out its responsibilities under this Agreement shall be furnished to the County without charge by the City /Township and the City /Township agrees to cooperate in good faith with the County in carrying out the work under this Agreement. 3. The City /Township agrees to furnish, without charge, work space, if needed, for an appraiser to perform such tasks as document review, with such tasks to be performed during normal business hours for the City /Township. 4. The County agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City /Township and all of its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action arising out of or by reason of the performance of work provided for herein to be performed by the County. It is further agreed that any and all full time employees of the County engaged in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein shall be considered employees of the County only and not of the City /Township and that any and all claims that may arise under the Workman's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said County employees shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the County. 5. This Agreement shall commence on January 2, 2017 and shall terminate on June 30, 2019. Either party may initiate an extension of this Agreement for a term of two years by giving the other party written notice of its intent to extend no less than 120 days prior to the termination of this Agreement. If the party who receives said notice of intent to extend gives written notice to the other party of its desire not to extend the Agreement at least 60 days prior to the termination of this Agreement, this Agreement shall terminate on June 30, 2019. 6. In consideration of said assessment services, the City /Township agrees to pay the County a fee of $11.50 per parcel for the 2018 and $12.00 per parcel for the 2019 assessment. In addition, there will be an additional fee of $50.00 for each new construction residential or commercial /industrial building permit with an estimated construction cost of $499,999.00 or less. There will also be an additional fee of $150.00 per parcel for each new construction residential or commercial /industrial building permit with an estimated construction cost of $500,000.00 or more. These additional fees shall be only applicable in those cities or townships which issue their own building permits. 7. Any notice which may be given or made by a party hereto under the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent by United States Mail or personally delivered to the other party addressed as follows: To City: City of Monticello 505 Walnut St, Ste #1 Monticello, MN 55362 To County: Anthony P. Rasmuson, Wright County Assessor Wright County Government Center 10 2nd Street NW, Room 100 Buffalo, MN 55313 8. The Agreement may be amended or modified only by written agreement signed by authorized representatives of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers and delivered on its behalf, this _day ofA4m w 19& 2016. Dated: l lg �J By Dated: LIA Dated: By City of Monticello EXHIBIT A During the term of this Agreement, the County shall: 1. Physically inspect and revalue real property, as required by law. 2. Physically inspect and value all new construction, additions and renovation 3. Conduct valuation reviews prior to Board of Review or Open Book Meeting. 4. Attend Board of Review or Open Book Meeting. Per Board request, make all necessary review appraisals. 5. Keep updated field card file - current values, homestead and classification data. 6. Print, mail and post valuation notices. 7. Respond to taxpayers regarding assessment or appraisal problems or inquiries periodically. 8. Make divisions and combinations periodically. 9. Administer the abatement process pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 375.192. 10. Make appraisals for, testify or negotiate all District Court or Tax Court filings. 11. Post values from appraisal cards to assessment rolls. 12. Adjust estimated market values on those properties not physically inspected as needed and per sales analysis. Assessor Contract Schedules 11/29/2016 Rate Increase Impact Schedule of Parcel Counts by Year Parcel Type Taxable New construction New Commercial <$500,000 New Commercial >$500,000 Exempt Mobile home Personal property Schedule of Annual Charges $49,871.50 $64,373.50 Change $14,502.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 4669 4668 Current Proposed Current Proposed Parcel Type Count Rate Rate Costs Costs Taxable 4633 $ 10.50 $ 11.50 $48,646.50 $53,279.50 Exempt 348 - 11.50 - 4,002.00 Mobile home 398 - 11.50 - 4,577.00 Personal property 10 - 11.50 - 115.00 New construction 44 25.00 50.00 1,100.00 2,200.00 New Commercial <$500,000 1 25.00 50.00 25.00 50.00 New Commercial >$500,000 1 100.00 150.00 100.00 150.00 Schedule of Parcel Counts by Year Parcel Type Taxable New construction New Commercial <$500,000 New Commercial >$500,000 Exempt Mobile home Personal property Schedule of Annual Charges $49,871.50 $64,373.50 Change $14,502.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 4669 4668 4603 4611 4633 2 22 52 73 44 1 0 0 1 1 5 1 2 2 1 348 398 10 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Charge per year $49,599.50 $49,664.00 $49,831.50 $50,465.50 $49,871.50 City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 2I. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -090 approving a cash donation from All Element Inc. of $5,120 for the purchase of Firemaxx Tools A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: All Element Inc. donated $5,120 to the Monticello Fire Department. This cash donation is for the purchase of various Firemaxx tools. As required by state statute, if the City accepts the donation of funds, the City Council needs to adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. Al. Budget Impact: The donations will be used to pay for entertainment at the Farmer's Market and for the pictures with Santa at our holiday event. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff plans and implements the Home for the Holiday event where Santa will be at. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 -090 approving the contribution and authorize use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2016 -090 City of Monticello RESOLUTION NO. 2016-090 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION VALUE All Element Inc. Cash Contribution $5,120.00 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY PURPOSE /AMOUNT All Element Inc. Firemaxx Tools for Fire Department Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 12th day of December, 2016. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 2J. Consideration of approving the replacement of carpet /flooring in the Monticello Community Center in the childcare area, the gallery hallway, and the fitness area for a total cost of $44,054 (AM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The item was tabled at the last meeting to address an issue of a possible bid. The issue has been resolved and should proceed as originally submitted. City Council is asked to consider replacing the original and now worn flooring in various areas of the Community Center per the improvement plan provided to the City Council at the MCC budget presentation. Pictures of the existing carpet and flooring are attached for Council's reference. For quoting purposes, staff specified Shaw carpeting for the childcare center and main gallery hallway. In the fitness areas upstairs staff specified a recycled rubber fitness flooring by Ecore. This is the same flooring that was previously installed in the newer cardio equipment area. Quotes have been requested from four contractors and three have been received for both the carpeting and work out room flooring. The goal is to have the entire project finished before the end of the current year. These quotes were received as follows: Quotes for Carpeting CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION TOTAL QUOTE Ray's Abbey Carpet Sales Installation of carpet in the Childcare Center - childcare center and main $4,752.94 gallery hallway. Gallery Hallway - $9,584.00 CFS Interiors and Flooring Installation of carpet in the Childcare Center - childcare center and main $6,165.00 gallery hallway. Gallery Hallway - $8,040.00 Anderson's New Carpet Installation of carpet in the Childcare Center - Design childcare center and main $4,501.49 gallery hallway. Gallery Hallway - $7,574.54 City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 Quotes for Workout Flooring CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION TOTAL QUOTE A.E. Michaels Flooring Installation of fitness flooring $31,977.97 in the upstairs weight machine and free weight area. CFS Interiors and Flooring Installation of fitness flooring $37,787.00 in the upstairs weight machine and free weight area. Anderson's New Carpet Installation of fitness flooring $33,262.00 Design in the upstairs weight machine and free weight area. Al. Budget Impact: The 2016 budget includes $50,000 for improvements and $30,500 for building repairs and maintenance. Amounts expended above the budget are financed through the fund balance (prior year accumulation of revenues in excess of expenditures). A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include moving fitness equipment and furniture for the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve replacement of community center childcare carpet for $4,501.49, gallery hallway carpet for $7,574.54, and fitness flooring for $31,977.97 (total $44,054) by the lowest bidders as highlighted in yellow as identified in the previous tables. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Pictures B. Quotes 2 City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 w City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 I City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 Pictures of Childcare Center: 7AW City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 Pictures of Weight Equipment Area: r � 1►1 m in City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 I .e 10 Pictures of Free Weight Area: t * A. 1 b, • i .�& City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 r i OR FO) i T J 1 1 12 City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 10 t M • • F LwowOU-4 0 1 13 NN ". �1 N City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 r7:j Date: 11 U�8 �tZJ16 -Sales EstiIn atz� t 7:02 '0 — - -.J Time: '= � j A. E. M I CI IAELS 92:4 STATE HWY 25 NE MONTICELLO MN 55362 763-295-2200 Fax: 763---295-2200 SOLD TO rMONTICELLO COMMUNITY CTR WALNUT, STE #4 ICELLO MN 5536 r JOD /pO #: WORK OUT Reference . 4086'3 page r- jumher: 1 Acct- Number: 2159 SHIP TO [FREE WEIGHT AREA WORK OUT AREA UPSTAIRS AND FREE WE P h n l . ?-'71 -711 � Phn-2 ' JERRY Term:. Employee: .�. - -- — - -• - -- — _— - -- .— _ Qty Unit Cat-%.0 Product Code 13000.80 SOFT 14 -1 9.00 SST 14-1 2,`.,0.00 SOFT 14 -1 4,00 SOFT 14 -1 1.04 EACH 10-1 1.00 EACH 10 -1 1.00 EACH 10-1 W.N SOFT 14 -1 11280.90 SQFT 14 -1 4.00 SOFT 14-1 130,00 SOFT 14 -1 3.00 -01 14 -1 12.00 SOFT 14 -1 1.00 EACH 10-1 Product Description EVERIAST ECORE :TYLE A: EL36 PEANUT CRUNCH COLOR: gm RUBBER FLOOR SIZE: 15 ROLLS 4X50 CUTS: UPPER WORKOUT AREA ADHESIVE BLACK CO"E BASE 4IN VINYL 440 COVE BASE ADHESIVE 96TALL BASE PMVE OLD CARPET \GLUE INSTALL RUBBER FLOOR 318 T MOLD VINYL EVERLAST ECORE STYLE I- EL36 PEANUT CRUNCH COLOR: 8* RUBBER FLOOR SIZE: ' 6 - 4X50 FT ROLLS CUTS: FREE WIGHT ROOM E GRIP ADHESIVE 4 INCH BALCK VINYL BASE 440 C3VE BASE ADHEIVE TRANSITION PREP, INSTALLATION Custover Signature Suggested Selling Price Extension 111.99 $11,970.00 + $211.00 12, 43?. N + $1.00 12%.00 + $6.00 124.06 } 1256.00 1:50.06 14,299.00 14,299.80 13,750.00 13,`150.00 13.00 1180.00 + 13.99 $4,798-80 $271.80 11,094.86 } 11.03 11;0.00 $ 16.99 129.97 t 14.00 $48.0 + 12,745.08 $21745.80 + Sub-Total 131,377.97 S= -le Total 131,977.97 Balance Due $31,977.97 We appreciate your business' PAYMENT DUE: AT TIME OF PRODUCT PICKUP DR WHEN INSTALL 15 Ct)MF'1_ETED SY US. ANDERSON'S NEW CARPET DESIGN, INC. 7685 MAIN ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 763 - 571 -4846 Fax 763- 571 -9492 ancd @earthlink.net I NAME /ADDRESS I CITY MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST, SUITE 1 MONTICELLO MN 55362 ESTIMATE DATE PO# 11/7/2016 11438 SIGNATURE Page 1 REP PROJECT DESCRIPTION QTY COST TOTAL CURVED MAIN CORRIDOR OUTSIDE THE MINNESOTA ROOM SHAW CONTRACT CARPET SQUARES "SCULPT 181.22 29.95 5,427.54 TILE REWOVEN 5TO07 COLOR UNDERGROUND 83505 OPTION MILLIKEN HIDDEN PLAINS OR TECTONIC VS SHAW $5900.00 TAKE UP AND HAUL AWAY/ SCRAPE AWAY OLD 1 800.00 800.00 GLUES CARPET INSTALLATION 1 1,275.00 1,275.00 TRANSITIONS 24 3.00 72.00 SUBTOTAL========================= = = = = == 7,574.54 CUT CARPET OR LVT TO EXISTING BASE - POSSIBLE ADD BASE SHOE TO EXISTING $2.50 LNFT 2 ND FLOOR WEIGHT AREA RUBBER FLOOR ECORE 8MM COLOR T.B.D. - 4,200 4.63 19,446.00 EL90 IS DISCONTINUED - CROSS OVER TO "EL36A PEANUT CRUNCH 2" RUBBER INSTALLATION INCLUDES GLUES 4,200 2.50 10,500.00 NEW 4" VINYL BASE TOE 440 2.00 880.00 VINYL TRANSITIONS 60 TO EXISTING RUBBER 84 4.00 336.00 AND 18' TO TRACK AND OTHER AREAS TOTAL SIGNATURE Page 1 ANDERSON'S NEW CARPET DESIGN, INC. 7685 MAIN ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 763 -571 -4846 Fax 763- 571 -9492 ancd @earthlenk.net I NAME /ADDRESS I CITY MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST, SUITE 1 MONTICELLO MN 55362 ESTIMATE DATE PO# 11/7/2016 11438 SIGNATURE Page 2 REP PROJECT DESCRIPTION QTY COST TOTAL TAKE UP AND HAUL AWAY OLD CARPET AND 1 2,100.00 2,100.00 SCRAPE AWAY OLD GLUES/ FLOOR REPAIR RAMP TO WEIGHT ROOM MOVING OF WEIGHT EQUIP BY OTHERS SUBTOTAL========================= = = = = == 33,262.00 CARPET AT CHILD CARE SHAW CONTRACT 5T104 COLOR SECTOR 3585 117.26 25.85 3,031.17 TAKE UP AND HAUL AWAY AND SCRAPE AWAY 117 3.50 409.50 CARPET INSTALLATION 117.26 7.00 820.82 4" VINYL BASE 6' TRANSITIONS 120 2.00 240.00 SUBTOTAL========================= = = = = == 4,501.49 FOOD SERVICE CORRIDOR CUT OUT TERRAZZO AREA 47'X3.6 164 7.00 1,148.00 INSERT ZINC METALS 60 9.50 570.00 EPDXY MOVEMENT JOINT - POUR BACK SELF 164 9.50 1,558.00 LEVEL INSTALLATION IN FILL CARPET WALK OFF MATT BUDGET T.B.D. 24 40.00 960.00 CARPET INSTALLATION 24 8.00 192.00 SUBTOTAL========================= = = = = == 4,428.00 HIGH SHINE DIAMOND PLATE CUT TO 3'6" OR 42" 1 20.00 20.00 HIGH - PART # 3003-1-122.063 R/L - PRICE PER LNFT INSTALLED $80.00 PER PANEL OR $20.00 LNFT - PULL AND RESET FIXTURES BY OTHERS Sales Tax 7.125% 0.00 TOTAL $49,786.03 SIGNATURE Page 2 Ray's Abbey Carpet Sales, Inc. 17000 205th Ave NW P.O. Box 715 Big Lake, MN 55309 763 - 263 -2058 763 - 263 -2558 Fax tt Name / Address City of Monticello Community Center 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 Estimate Date Proposal # 11/4/2016 5428 Install Location Terms Due Date Rep Customer Phone 11/4/2016 RKS 763- 271 -3268 Item Description Qty Price Ea... Total CHILD CARE ROOM Carpet - All Carpet Style: Cut & Compose Construct ST104 -- Color: 03585 Sector Multi -Level Loop 918.75 2.56 2,352.00 Nylon Tearout Carpet G1... Tearout Carpet Glue Direct & Disposal 875 0.50 437.50 Installation Glue ... Install Carpet Glue Direct 918.75 0.85 780.94 Adhesive Shaw 5000 Adhesive 2 60.00 120.00 Embossing Levelor Embossing Levelor Material and Installation 875 1.10 962.50 Shipping and Han... Shipping and Handling 1 100.00 100.00 Lien Notice: "(a) ANY PERSON OR COMPANY SUPPLYING LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT TO YOUR PROPERTY MAY FILE A LIEN AGAINST YOUR PORPERTY IF THAT PERSON OR COMPANY IS NOT PAID FOR THE CONTRIBUTIONS." "(b) UNDER MINNESOTA LAW, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT DIRECTLY AND DEDUCT THIS AMOUNT FROM OUR CONTRACT PRICE, OR WITHHOLD THE AMOUNTS DUE FROM US UNTIL 120 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT UNLESS WE GIVE YOU A LIEN WAIVER SIGNED BY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED ANY LABOR OR MATERIAL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND WHO GAVE YOU TIMELY NOTICE." A SERVICE CHARGE OF 1.5% (18% ANNUALLY) WILL BE CHARGED PER MONTH ON ALL PAST DUE ACCOUNTS. IF CUSTOMER DEFAULTS THEY AGREE TO PAY ALL COST OF COLLECTION AGENCY FEES, COURT COST AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES. A NSF (RETURN CHECK AND ACCOUNT CLOSED A MAXIMUM FEE ALLOWED BY MINNESOTA LAW WILL BE ADDED. Subtotal $4,752.94 Sales Tax (6°875 %) $0.00 Total $4,752.94 Accepted By Date Ray's Abbey Carpet Sales, ffne. 17000 205th Ave NW P.O. BOX 715 Big Lake, MN 55309 763 - 263 -2058 763 - 263 -2558 Fax # Name /Address City of Monticello Community Center 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 'Estii���»te Date Proposal # 11/6/2016 5429 Install Location Terms Due Date Rep Customer Phone 11/6/2016 RKS 763 -271 -3268 Item Description Qty Price Ea... Total HALLWAY Carpet - All Carpet Style: Sculpt 5TO07 --- Color: 83505 Underground 1,800 2.63 4,734.00 Take Up Carpet A... Take Up Carpet And Disposal 1,800 0.50 900.00 Installation Glue ... Install Carpet Glue Direct 1,800 0.85 1,530.00 Adhesive Shaw 5000 Adhesive 4 60.00 240.00 Embossing Levelor Embossing Levelor Material and Installation 1,800 1.10 1,980.00 Shipping and Han... Shipping and Handling 1 200.00 200.00 Lien Notice: "(a) ANY PERSON OR COMPANY SUPPLYING LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT TO YOUR PROPERTY MAY FILE A LIEN AGAINST YOUR PORPERTY IF THAT PERSON OR COMPANY IS NOT PAID FOR THE CONTRIBUTIONS." "(b) UNDER MINNESOTA LAW, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT DIRECTLY AND DEDUCT THIS AMOUNT FROM OUR CONTRACT PRICE, OR WITHHOLD THE AMOUNTS DUE FROM US UNTIL 120 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT UNLESS WE GIVE YOU A LIEN WAIVER SIGNED BY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED ANY LABOR OR MATERIAL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND WHO GAVE YOU TIMELY NOTICE." A SERVICE CHARGE OF 1.5% (18% ANNUALLY) WILL BE CHARGED PER MONTH ON ALL PAST DUE ACCOUNTS. IF CUSTOMER DEFAULTS THEY AGREE TO PAY ALL COST OF COLLECTION AGENCY FEES, COURT COST AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES. A NSF (RETURN CHECK) AND ACCOUNT CLOSED A MAXIMUM FEE ALLOWED BY MINNESOTA LAW WILL BE ADDED. Subtotal $9,584.00 Sales Tax (6.875 %) $0.00 Total $9,584.00 Accepted By Date opufs INTERIORS FLOORING 940 Apollo Road, Suite 110 Eagan, NM 55121 Ph: (651) 681 -8100 Fax: (651) 681 -1385 To GENERAL CONTRACTORS - VL Phone: Attn: TBD Proposal From: Vicky J Langan Estimator. Rick Olsen Admin: VIOLINA BEROVA Revision #: Date. 11/10/2016 Bid Due Date: 11/8/2016 Plan Date: Addendum: Proiect MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER ATT: ANN 763- 271 -3268 505 WALNUT STREET MONTICELLO, MN 55362 FITNESS AREAIWEIGHT MACHINE SUPPL YAND INSTALL ECORE 8 MM 6'R UBBER SHEET GOOD IN WEIGHT AND FREE WEIGHT AREA. INCLUDES VINYL BASE TOTAL (APPLICABLE TAXINCLUDED) $ 37,787.00 CHILDCARE SUPPLYAND INSTALL SHAW CARPET TILE WITH JOHNSONITE BLUE VINYL BASE TOTAL (APPLICABLE TAXINCLUDED) $ 6,165.00 CONF ROOM CORRIDORSITHEA TER SUPPLYAND INSTALL MILLIKEN CARPET TILE TOTAL (APPLICABLE TAXINCLUDED) $ 8,040.00 NOTES: SUPPLY AND INSTALL CARPET AND ECORE 8MM 6' RUBBER FLOORING INCLUDES DEMO OF EXISTING CARPET AND RUBBER IF RUBBER FLOORING IS SOUND AND REMAINS INTACT DEDUCT $978.00 DOES NOT INCLUDE REMOVING AND REPLACMENT OF FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT INCLUDES RECLAIMATION AND DISPOSAL OF EXISTING CARPET IF USING SHAW CARPET TILE IN LIEU OF MILLIKEN IN COORIDOR ADD $2080.00 Commercial Flooring Services, LLC will furnish, deliver, and install the above material in accordance with all transmitted plans, specifications and general conditions for the listed price. The price includes all applicable freight and taxes, unless otherwise noted. Unless specifically included in this proposal: excludes all demolition, repair or take -up of existing flooring; excludes vacuuming, damp mopping, buffing, waxing or floor protection; excludes floor floating, leveling or repair; excludes sealing of floor, cleaning or removal of oil, grease, solvents, paints, plaster or other foreign substances; excludes asbestos control /abatement; includes no attic stock of material beyond installation coverage; includes work only during regular hours and for a single phase job; excludes any furniture movement; excludes any addenda beyond the base bid; Per CRI- 104 -96, 6.3 site conditions: The owner or general contractor must submit to the flooring contractor a written report on moisture and surface alkalinity of the slab to determine its suitability as a substrate for the material to be installed. Floor preparation will be billed on a time and material basis at the current rate per man -hour plus the cost of the materials. Client is subject to payment for stored materials. Commercial Flooring Services, LLC will not accept charge backs of damage or cleaning without the option to inspect claim(s) to repair or without the option to make arrangements for acceptable repairs at their expense. Commercial Flooring Services, LLC is not responsible for any claims that might result from product delivery date changes beyond their control. If a manufacturer requires a deposit to manufacture /ship certain items, client will pay that amount. This proposal is valid for thirty (30) days. Full payment is due ten (10) days from receipt of invoice unless otherwise specified. WARRANTY DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY MOISTURE RELATED SUBFLOOR FAILURES 11110/2016 03:21 PM Bid #: 30661 Page I of 2 MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER GENERAL CONTRACTORS - VL Page 2 of 2 CFS INTERIORS & FLOORING GENERAL CONTRACTORS - VL Signed: Signed: Vicky J Langan Proposed Installation Start Date: 11/1012016 03:21 PM Bid #: 30661 Page 2 of 2 City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 2K. Consideration of approving Resolution 2016 -091 calling for redemption of outstanding General Obligation Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2008A for selected maturities. (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The 2008A general obligation sewer revenue refunding bonds were issued to refund a Minnesota Public Facilities Authority loan. These bonds were privately placed and debt service is provided through an annual $500,000 tax levy and development impact fee collections. The MPFA loan financed wastewater treatment improvements. There are three remaining semi - annual principal and interest payments remaining. The total debt principal outstanding is $1,496,000. The final two debt service payments occur on August 1, 2017 and February 1, 2018. The principal amounts due on those dates are $499,000 and $507,000. The redemption feature became available February 1 of this year. The city redeemed the August 2018 $516,000 principal payment in September. The 2008A debt service fund has sufficient resources for redeeming the final principal payment. Additional impact fee collections for this year will support an early redemption of the February 1, 2018 debt service payment. Annual debt service fund revenues are sufficient for redeeming the August 2017 debt by six months. The interest rate on the redeemed bond is 3.4 %, which is much higher than the interest on investments with a similar time horizon. Al. Budget Impact: The financial impact: $1,006,000. The interest on the final two payments $25,721. The interest earnings on one -year investment is about 3/4 of a percent. The interest earnings on a six -month investment is about 6 /1 0th of a percent. Projected net difference between interest costs and investment earnings is about $20,000. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt resolution 2016 -091 calling for redemption of outstanding General Obligation Bonds, 2008A Series for selected maturities. 2. Motion to not adopt resolution 2016 -091. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #l. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Draft Resolution 2016 -091 B. Debt service levy graph. EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Held: December 12, 2016 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, was duly called to order on December 12, 2016, at 6:30 P.M. The following members were present: and the following members were absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2016 -091 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE REDEMPTION OF THE OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER REVENUE REFUNDING BOND, SERIES 2008A WHEREAS: A. The City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota issued $9,270,000 General Obligation Sewer Revenue Refunding Bond, Series 2008A, dated April 17, 2008; and B. All of said bonds maturing on August 1, 2017, and February 1, 2018, are subject to redemption, in whole or in part, and prepayment at the option of the City on February 1, 2016, and on any date thereafter at par plus accrued interest, all as provided in the resolution of the City authorizing the issuance of said bond; and C. The City deems it desirable and in the best interest of the City to call $499,000 of the outstanding bond maturing on August 1, 2017 and $507,000 of the outstanding bond maturing on February 1, 2018, for redemption on February 1, 2017, in accordance with said resolution authorizing the issuance of said bond, and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota as follows: 1. $499,000 of the General Obligation Sewer Revenue Refunding Bond, Series 2008A, dated April 17, 2008, of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, maturing on August 1, 2017 and $507,000 of the same issue maturing on February 1, 2018, shall be redeemed and prepaid on February 1, 2017, at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest for each such bond called. 2. The Finance Director, appointed as Paying Agent and Registrar, is hereby authorized and directed to give mailed notice of call to the holders of the bond as may be required by law. Said notice shall be in substantially the attached form. 3. The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to send full payment to the holder(s) on said call date to pay all principal and interest due on the bonds as of the call date. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon a vote taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT CITY OF MONTICELLO I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Finance Director of the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that I have carefully compared the preceding extract of minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held on the date therein indicated with the original minutes thereof on file in my office and that the same is a full, true and correct transcript thereof insofar as said minutes relate to the topic described in the title of the resolution set forth in the extract. WITNESS my hand officially and the official seal of the City on December 12, 2016. Finance Director (SEAL) NOTICE OF CALL FOR REDEMPTION GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER REVENUE REFUNDING BOND, SERIES 2008A DATED: APRIL 17, 2008 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that by order of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, there has been called for redemption and prepayment on FEBRUARY 1, 2017 $499,000 in principal amount of the outstanding bond of the City designated as General Obligation Sewer Revenue Refunding Bond, Series 2008A, dated April 17, 2008, having the stated maturity date of August 1, 2017 and $507,000 in principal amount of the same issue with the stated maturity date of February 1, 2018. The portion of the bond being called for redemption represents the sinking fund principal amounts due on August 1, 2017 and February 1, 2018, and will be called at a price of 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest to February 1, 2017, on which date all interest on said portion of the bond will cease to accrue. Dated: December 12, 2016 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Wayne Oberg Finance Director Important Notice: In compliance with the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, the paying agent is required to withhold a specified percentage of the principal amount of the redemption price payable to the holder of any bonds subject to redemption and prepayment on the redemption date, unless the paying agent is provided with the Social Security Number or Federal Employer Identification Number of the holder, properly certified. Submission of a fully executed Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification, Form W -9 (Rev. December 2011), will satisfy the requirements of this paragraph. Debt Service Levy (2013 - 2027) $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2010A Imp 2011A Imp 2007A Imp. 2008 Sewer 2008A MCC 2014A AE 20156 SR &I 2016A SR &I City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 2L. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2016 -067 approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: MnDOT is requesting the City enter into a Master Partnership Contract. This contract is pursuant to Minnesota Statue Sections 174.02 and 161.20 allowing MnDOT to enter into agreements with local governments for shared services. Consideration of this agreement was tabled previously for further review and is now ready for consideration. This agreement allows MnDOT to pay local governments to perform certain work related to design, construction, maintenance and improvements on trunk highways and vice versa. Under this resolution the City Administrator is authorized to enter into work order contracts with the City Engineer providing technical support. The primary purposes of this contract includes; allowing MnDOT to complete lab testing for materials, such as concrete and bituminous testing on State or Municipal State Aid roadway projects and allows for Cities and MnDOT to initiate Work Order Contracts as necessary and agreed upon by both parties for items such as snow removal, emergency services, sign knockdown repair, carcass removal, etc. More information on the program is provided in the enclosed memo from MnDOT. Currently there are no official agreements to complete these shared service items and it is not covered in typical MnDOT and City project agreements. The resolution stipulates that the City Administrator may execute work order contracts on behalf of the City within the confines of the City of Monticello Purchasing Policy. Even though the agreement covers only six months, it is needed to accommodate material testing that will be need in conjunction with the TH 25/71h Street intersection improvement. The agreement will expire on June 30, 2017. MnDOT plans to present another 5 year agreement to the City early next summer. A.1 Budget Impact: Anticipated to be minimal or status quo. A.2 Staff Impact: Minimal staff time or status quo. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 -067 approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT. 2. Motion to deny adoption of City Resolution 2016 -067. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. This is considered a housekeeping item to formalize policies and practices already in place. City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 A SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2016 -067 B. MnDOT Memo 11/20/12 C. Master Partnership Contract CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2016 -067 WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Transportation wishes to cooperate closely with local units of government to coordinate the delivery of transportation services and maximize the efficient delivery of such services at all levels of government; and WHEREAS, MnDOT and local governments are authorized by Minnesota Statutes sections 471.59, 174.02, and 161.20, to undertake collaborative efforts for the design, construction, maintenance and operation of state and local roads; and WHEREAS: the parties wish to able to respond quickly and efficiently to such opportunities for collaboration, and have determined that having the ability to write "work orders" against a master contract would provide the greatest speed and flexibility in responding to identified needs. THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED: 1. That the City of Monticello, Minnesota enter into a Master Partnership Contract with the Minnesota Department of Transportation, a copy of which was before the Monticello City Council. 2. That the proper City of Monticello, Minnesota officers are authorized to execute such contract, and any amendments thereto. 3. That the City of Monticello City Administrator is authorized to negotiate work order contracts pursuant to the Master Contract, which work order contracts may provide for payment to or from MnDOT, and that the City of Monticello City Administrator may execute such work order contracts on behalf of the City of Monticello within the confines of the City of Monticello's Purchasing Policy without further approval by the City Council. ATTEST: Approved this 12th day of December, 2016. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Date: '003 O1 Minnesota Department of Transportation b 1 District 3 - Administration ' °FTNp� 7594 Industrial Park Road Baxter, MN 55425 Memo TO: District 3 Local County /City Engineer FROM: Ken Larson 0— District 3 State Aid Assistant DATE: November 20, 2012 SUBJECT: Master Partnership Contract Renewals Office Tel: (218) 828 -5708 Fax: (218) 828 -5814 The current Master Partnership Contracts we have with you are expiring and need to be renewed, with some updating and language changes made in these new agreements. Once in place these new agreements will be good through June 30, 2017. Please review these agreements and present to your county board/city council for approval as soon as possible. Local signatures are required on page 14, and a support resolution from the board /council is also required (see attached sample). Also attached is the Master Contract Certification Form that delegates authority to the district to administer local agreements. When you have signatures and resolution done, please return the entire packet to Kelvin Howieson, District State Aid Engineer in Baxter. We will continue the MnDOT processing, and you will receive a final approved copy when it's completed. Some of the current Work Orders language is now covered in these new agreements. If we have other unique Work Orders with you that need renewing, revised versions of those will follow shortly. Many of the inplace agreements expire in mid - December, 2012, so we appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. Contact Kelvin or me if you have any questions. Thank you. Cc: Kelvin Howieson — LuAnn Cameron ,4`N "��°rgyo Minnesota Department of Transportation Baxter, District 3 Office Tel: 21M8-5707 7694 Industrial Park Rd. Fax: 218 - 828.5814 OpTPAa Baxter, MN 56425 Contract Routing/Approval Checklist TO: Routing/Task Checklist FROM: Kelvin Howieson District 3 State Aid Engineer DATE: Nov. 21, 2012 MnDOT Contract # 02636 Contract Is between MnDOT and: City of Monticello Project Description: Master Partnership Contract Please review, approve and forward. Thank you. Routing/Task Checklist Contact Name Contact Info Date I . Obtain vendor approval signatures Bruce Westby 763- 271 -3236 Monticello City Engineer 2. Attach resolution from vendor, if a public agency 3. MnDOT Approval Mike Barnes MS: 120 Division Director 4. Contract Management Susan Berndt MS: 130 5. Return to: Kelvin Howieson MS: 030 Minimum Originals: [3] [11 Contract Management [1] Originator [1] Vendor Additional Originals: [1] Bonnie Peetsch (Master Partnerships and WOs), MS 215. Additional Attachments: Original Contract Sample Resolution Master Contract Certification Form CM Contract Routing/Approval Checklist, 08/03/2012 An Equal Opportunity Employer WDUI' Agreement 11: Multiple T- Number: 4, A PROP ESSIONALI`I'ECHNICAL MASTER CONTRACT CERTIFICAT[ON FORM Instructions: 1) Complete this form for all Master Professional/Technical (P /T) Services Contract programs, 2) Submit this form to your Agency Contract Coordinator to obtain Depadment of Administration approval. 3) No work orders may be issued until at anaster contract program has been approved and master contracts are fully execute([. ne lartrnent: Tratmortation (MnDOT) State Aid Estimated Cost of the Master Contract Program: $5 million -Division: Source ofPunds: Trunlc Highway >:und (it is anticipated that individual master contracts will be capped , at $250,000. Master Contract Program Period: Master Contracts executed to start between.July 2012 and July 2013 and each Master Contract will be lot- a terin of five years. *The term of the original master contract program must not exceed two years unless the commissioner of Administration determines that a longer duration is iu the best interest of the state. The total contract term cannot exceed five. years. Minn. Stat. § 16C.08, subd, 3 (5). If the original contract length lodger than two years is re(luired, please write a justification below: This master contract program is for local government assistance with projects within the territorial jurisdiction of the local government. Since competitive solicitation procedures aren't feasible for such assistance, running a master contract for as long as possible will reduce the administrative burden for both the state and the local �overnments:4 13ACKG ROUND Nature of Master Contract Program - MnDOT will enter into "master" partnership agreements with local governments, pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sections 174,02, and 161,20 (copies attache(l). These agreements will allow MnDOT to pay local governments to perform certain work related to design, construction, maintenance, and improvement of trunk highways (and vice versa). M11.DOT anticipates Master Contracts with each county, and some cities - estimated total of 175 contracts, This is a renewal of a program MnDOT has had in place for several years. There are three major Factors are driving the need for this program. First, WDOT staff reductions, as well as flat gas tax revenues, require us to work cooperatively with local governments to most effectively utilize the expertise of both state and local staff, Second, in many cases, local government personnel are more readily available to work. oil protects, which translate into shorter turnaround times, and better overall service to the public. Third, MilDOT has certain expertise and equipment and earl help local governments complete some tasks they cannot perform with their own forces. This 1)"0,91.11111 will involve the following categories of work: 1) The local government provides professional /technical services. The local government will provide staffto perform professional and technical services, which could include (by way of example and without limitation) roadway design, public involvement processes, and Construction in`;peCtiOn and administration, `Phis work could also include project management, which may involve the local government hiring and managing sub consultants to perform such work. Often, local governments con combine trunk highway work with their local projects (e.g. including a section of a trunk highway in the Page 1 of 5 (Revisicl 411 1) ad- .7 4? &0 -( MOOT Agreement #: Multiple T- Number: design of county road mill and overlay design project), making such work much more coordinated and efticieut. MnDOT may also perform similar services for the local government on a reimbursable basis (sec number 5 below). 2) The local government provides maintenance services. The local government will provide staff resources to perform such work as repairing sign knockdowns, fixing damaged guardrails, Filling potholes, or removing animal carcasses. in many places, county and city forces have a greater presence on the roads, and are able to deal with these situations more quickly than having to dispatch a MnDOT crew From a distant truck station. This also frees ill) MnDOT staff to focus on needs to which the expertise and equipment of state forces is better - suited. MnDOT may also perform similar services for the local government on a reimbursable basis (See number 5 below). 3) The local government lets and manages construction contracts. The local government will provide more or less "turnkey" construction projects (subject to normal MnDOT reviews and approvals) on the trunk highway system, by combining state work with local work. For example, if a county has a mill and overlay project on a county road, MnDOT might request that it add a section of nearby trunk highway, so that the county will let a single coliftact including both the county and the state projects. This coordinates and delivers projects more efficiently and with less disruption to the traveling public.'This also helps allocate work to the party (local or state) with the expertise ])lost suited to the project. MnDOT may also perform similar services for the local government on it reimbursable basis (see number 5 below). 4) The parties will agree to cooperate and share equipment and personnel in the event of an emergency. Having this mutual- aid agreement in place will allow the parties to collect front the Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursement: for emergency response. 5) There will also be a "receivable" component to the contract, which will provide a mechanism for MnDOT to receive payment for performing similar services For local governments. Pi-oduct or Result of Work Ordeli• Contracts The product or result will depend on the `category of work, but includes (by way of example and without limitation) materials testing, bridge inspection, roadway design plans, management of the public involvement process and related administrative work, construction inspection and administration, repairing damaged signs and guardrails, and performing work such as seal - coating or ])till and overlay on tnink highways in conjunction with local projects. Other Methods Considered In !louse, Other Divisimis or Offices; Other- State Agencies) The primary alternatives are use of MnDOT staff and outside contractors. Other state agencies do not have the expertise or equipment to deliver transportation projects, but local governments do. As noted above, this effort is driven by the need to work more closely with local govemnients to ensure that that state and local resources are used most effectively to deliver a "seamless" transportation system to the public. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §16C.08, subdivisions 2 and 3, provide the following: 1) Describe how the proposed master contracts are necesspry and reasonable to advance the statutory rut ission of your agency; These contracts are related to the design and construction of projects on the trunk highway system, and maintenance of those highways. The Commissioner of Transportation is required by constitution and statute to construct, operate, and maintain the trunk highway system, and is authorized by statute to contract for those purposes. The Commissioner is further authorized to provide assistance to local governments for their local road systems. 2) Describe your plan to not. €fy firms or individuals who may be available to perform (lie services called for in the solicitation other than advertising in the State Register or on the MMD website; and . 'These contracts will be offered to local governments based on needs determined by individual Mn.DOT district: Page 2 of 5 (Revised 4/111 WDOT Agreement #- Multiple T- Number: in cooperation with the local governments in that district. Since each contract will be limited to the territorial jurisdiction of the applicable local government, a competitive solicitation cannot reasonably be performed, 3) Describe the perfoinnance measures or other tools that will be used to monitor and evaluate master contract performance and !tow the results of the work will be used. The work will be used to design, construct and maintain fate trunk highway system. MnDOT will use its standard performance review at the completion of each work order. In addition, this work will ultimately factor into the performance measures that are published at: htt ):I \ i' 1YWj1CCDLnitab111ty. Stflte. llllt. us/ ��artments/ `I'ransp�rtat101t /in[Icx.htlt3. MASTER CONTRACT PROGRAM INFORMATION The following information is required before the Master Contract Program will be approved. Attach additional sheets if necessary. The Department of Administration has final approval of all Master Contract Programs, 1. blow will the master contracts be structured to meet the agency's needs? Example: by region, by county, by successful contractor'? Contracts will be limited to the territorial jurisdiction of the local government. 2. Describe !tow file agency proposes to distribute: work fairly to the contractors that have master contracts'? Give specific details on how the agency will rotate work to the contractors. Examples: $045,000 - Agency Discretion, $5,000- $25,000 - receive 3 written proposals, $25,000-1- solicit to all on contract. OR create a list of all contractors, and then work is distributed evenly down tite list as work is needed. Since the contracts are limited to the territorial jurisdiction ofthe local government, there will be 11.0 rotation or solicitations used to award individual work orders. 3. What do you propose is the maximum state obligation under a work order contract? Example: No work order contract may exceed $100,000. No work order may exceed $175,000.00. 4. What do you propose are the required number of signatures for work order contracts? — 2 (contractor /agency) plus encumbrance —X 3 (continictorlagency /Administration) plus ertcurttbrance. Guidelines If the work specified in the master contract is very detailed and the work order requires very little additional information the work order will require only two signatures. Example a court reporter's product is defined by the master contract, the work order states the date, time, and place for the services. If a master contract gives vague descriptions of the work to be done, such as building construction designs, the work order contract will be required to have three signatures. Generally, all work orders exceeding $100,000 will require three signatures. 5. Will other state agencies be allowed to use these contracts? Yes —X No lfso, how will they report usage to the issuing agency? The issuing agency mist track work order contracts so that the total amount paid to a contractor does not exceed the master contract dollar total. CERTIFICATIONS Page 3 of 5 (Revised 4/11) • WI)O ' Agree ►Went 11: Multiple "r- Number: Agency Certifications Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 16C.08, I certify: I . No stale employee is (a) able and (b) available to perfrrr►n the services called for by the contract A. How did you re :yell this conclusion: As stated above, this is pall of all effort to utilize Mn /DOT staff in the most effective; planner, by working cooperatively with local govern ►rents. This arrangement will allow the parties to allocate work to the party with the resources {i.e. specialized training and equipment) most suited to performing the work, and to have "common° projects to be combined turd administered by one entity to increase the effectiveness of both entities (and minimizing disruptions, such as multiple detours, experienced by the public). For Professional/Technical services, this will generally be an "overflow" mechanism when State employees are frilly booked with work. B. List other methods considered for accomplishing title, worts. %Exmnple; fit-house, other tlivfsdorrs or offices, other slate agencies] The primary alternatives are use of MnDO`r staff and outside contractors. Other state agencies do not have the expertise or equipment to deliver transportation projects, but local governments do. As noted above, this effort is driven by tile need to work more closely with local governments to ensure that tilat state and local resources are used most effectively to deliver a "seamless" transportation system to the public. Given staff reductions from uncontrollable forces such as retirements, as well as the flattening of gas tax revenues, adding staff to perform this work is not practicable at this time. The normal competitive blrlding mechanisms (low bid) will not provide for adequale performance of the service. 3. Reasonahle efforts 011 be wade to publicize the availability of the contract to the public. MnDOT's State Aid office and District State Aid Engineers will be responsible for promoting this program to the local governments. Any local government will be allowed to participate if the MnDo'r district (working cooperatively with its local goverrunerlts) determines there is sufficient need. 4. The agency will develop and implemer7t a rwrillen plat? providing for the assignment of.specifrc agency personnel to manage the contract, Incluefin = a. monitoring and liaison frrrretion, the periodic review qf, interim reports or other indications of ixist pedbr finance, and the ullimette utilization of'the frt?al product oj fire .S'er'vices. The following person(s) has /have been assigned to manage the contract as well as nlontor and act as liaison for the contract Rick Kjonaas, 651 -366 -3802, ric Idonaas r st {rl�.rltn , M.nDOT, State Aid Office, 395 John Ireland Blvd, MS:500, St Paul, MN 55155. [MnDOT District State Aid Engineers will be responsible for the contracts with the local governments within their districts.] S. No one in or on beha f'oj'11te agency will authorize the contractor to begin work Before the contract is fully executed unless an escrrption has been granied by the Commissioner of Administration under Minn. Star. §160.05, s ubd 2a and funds are f tlly encumberecL 6. The contract will not establish an employer- employee relationship between the .state or the agency and ally person performing under the contract. 7. In the event the results of the contract work will be carried out or continued by state employees upon completion of the contract, the agency will require the conlractor to include stale employees in developmem and training to the extent necessary to erasure that after completion qf the conlraci, .stale employees can perform any ongoing work related to the .sarrle f trtelior?, 8. No current state employee will engage irr the peiflrmiance of the contract. Page 4 of S MR %rki -d 411 11 M DOT Agreement (1: Multiple 'r- Number; 9. Reasonable efforts will be made -to avoid conflicts of hrter est throughout the selection acrd petybrmance of this contract. All potential or actual conflicts of interest ivill be reported to MMD. 10. The agency will not contract ortt its previously elinrilyated jobs jor jour years Wthout first considering the same former employees who are on the seniority unit lCtytaff!l.5t who rlret't the !)rir9irnrrrlt crtali /rcations determined by the agency, Minnesota Office of Enterprise Technology review signature is required for contracts over $25,000 involving intormation and communications technology. Minnesota Office of Technology Reviewed (when applieaW Date: Not applicable. of Administration si Ma ri Is ana ement Di ion til �ofessional Technical Approval: I e: Page 5 of 5 (Revised 4/11) MMDCcrtll0I—t MnDOT Agreement # 02636 STATE OF Miff NNESOTA AND CIL'I Y OF MOM TffCEL LO MASTER FARTNERSH0 CONTRACT This master contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation hereinafter referred to as the "State" and "CITY OF MONTICELLO" acting through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "Local Government ". Recitals 1. The parties are authorized to enter into this agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §§ 15.061, 471.59 and 174.02. 2. Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system. 3. Each party to this Contract is a "road authority" as defined by Minnesota Statutes § 160.02 (subd. 25). 4. Minnesota Statutes Section 161.39, subdivision 1, authorizes a road authority to perform work for another road authority. Such work may include providing technical and engineering advice, assistance and supervision, surveying, preparing plans for the construction or reconstruction of roadways, and performing roadway maintenance. Minnesota Statues § 174.02 (subd. 6) authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to enter into agreements with other governmental entities for research and experimentation; for sharing facilities, equipment, staff, data, or other means of providing transportation- related services; or for other cooperative programs that promote efficiencies in providing governmental services, or that further development of innovation in transportation for the benefit of the citizens of Minnesota. 6. Each party wishes to occasionally procure services from the other party, which the parties agree will enhance the efficiency of delivering governmental services at all levels. This Master Partnership Contract provides a framework for the efficient handling of such requests. This Master Partnership Contract contains terms generally governing the relationship between the parties hereto. When specific services are requested, the parties will (unless otherwise specified herein) enter into a "Work Order" contracts. 7. Subsequent to the execution of this Master Partnership Contract, the parties may (but are not required to) enter into "Work Order" contracts. These Work Orders will specify the work to be done, timelines for completion, and compensation to be paid for the specific work. 3. The parties are entering into this Master Partnership Contract to establish terms that will govern all of the Work Orders subsequently issued under the authority of this Contract. Alaster Contract Term of Master Contract; Use of Work Order Contracts; Survival of Terms I.I. Effective Date: This contract will be effective on the date last signed by the Local Government, and all State officials as required under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 2. 1.2. A party must not accept work under this Contract until it is fully executed. 1.3. Expiration Date. This Contract will expire on June 30, 2017. Page 1 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 1.4. Work Order Contracts. A work order contract must be negotiated and executed (by both the State and the Local Government) for each particular engagement, except for Technical Services provided by the State to the Local Government as specified in Article 2. The work order contract must specify the detailed scope of work and deliverables for that engagement. A party must not begin work under a work order until such work order is fully executed. The terms of this Master Partnership Contract will apply to all work orders issued hereunder, unless specifically varied in the work order. The Local Government understands that this Master Contract is not a guarantee of any payments or work order assignments, and that payments will only be issued for work actually performed under fully- executed work orders. 1.5. Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this master contract and all work order contracts: 12. Liability; 13. State Audits; 14. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; 17. Publicity and Endorsement; 18. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 22. Data Disclosure. All terms of this Master Contract will survive with respect to any Work Order issued prior to the expiration date of the Master Contract. 1.6. Sample Work Order. A sample work order contract is available upon request from the State. 2. Technical Services 2.1. Technical Services include repetitive low -cost services routinely performed by the State for the Local Government. These services may be performed by the State for the Local Government without the execution of a work order, as these services are provided in accordance with standardized practices and processes and do not require a detailed scope of work. Technical services are limited to the following services: 2.1.1.Pavement Striping, Sign and Signal Repair, Bridge Load Ratings, Bridge and Structure Inspections, Minor Bridge Maintenance, Minor Road Maintenance (such as guard rail repair and sign knockdown repair), Pavement Condition Data, Materials Testing and Carcass Removal. 2.1.2. Every other service not falling under the services listed in 2.1.1 will require a Work Order contract (If you have questions regarding whether a service is covered under 2.1.1, please contact Contract Management). 2.2. The Local Government may request the State to perform Technical Services in an informal manner, such as by the use of email, a purchase order, or by delivering materials to a State lab and requesting testing. A request may be made via telephone, but will not be considered accepted unless acknowledged in writing by the State. 2.3. The State will promptly inform the Local Government if the State will be unable to perform the requested Technical Services. Otherwise, the State will perform the Technical Services in accordance with the State's normal processes and practices, including scheduling practices taking into account the availability of State staff and equipment. 2.4. Payment Basis. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties prior to performance of the services, the State will charge the Local Government the State's then - current rate for performing the Technical Services The then - current rate may include the State's normal and customary labor additives. The State will invoice the Local Government upon completion of the services, or at regular intervals not more than once monthly as agreed upon by the parties. The invoice will provide a summary of the Technical Services provided by the State during the invoice period. 3. Services Requiring A Work Order Contract 3.1. Work Order Contracts: A party may request the other party to perform any of the following services under individual work order contracts. Page 2 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 3.2. Professional and Technical Services. A party may provide professional and technical services upon the request of the other party. As defined by Minnesota Statutes § 16C.08 (subd. 1) professional /technical services "means services that are intellectual in character, including consultation, analysis, evaluation, prediction, planning, programming, or recommendation; and result in the production of a report or completion of a task ". Professional and technical services do not include providing supplies or materials except as incidental to performing such services. Professional and technical services include (by way of example and without limitation) engineering services, surveying, foundation recommendations and reports, environmental documentation, right -of -way assistance (such as performing appraisals or providing relocation assistance, but excluding the exercise of the power of eminent domain), geometric layouts, final construction plans, graphic presentations, public relations, and facilitating open houses. A party will normally provide such services with its own personnel; however, a party's professional /technical services may also include hiring and managing outside consultants to perform work provided that a party itself provides active project management for the use of such outside consultants. 3.3. Roadway Maintenance. A party may provide roadway maintenance upon the request of the other party. Roadway maintenance does not include roadway reconstruction. This work may include but is not limited to snow removal, ditch spraying, roadside mowing, CRS -2 road oil, bituminous mill and overlay (only small projects), seal coat, bridge hits, major retaining wall failures, major drainage failures, and message painting. All services must be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work, and work must be supervised by a qualified employee of the party performing the work. 3.4. Construction Administration. A party may administer roadway construction projects upon the request of the other party. Roadway construction includes (by way of example and without limitation) the construction, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of mainline, shoulder, median, pedestrian or bicycle pathway, lighting and signal systems, pavement mill and overlays, seal coating, guardrail installation, and channelization. These services may be performed by the Providing Party's own forces, or the Providing Party may administer outside contracts for such work. Construction administration may include letting and awarding construction contracts for such work (including state projects to be completed in conjunction with local projects). All contract administration services must be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work. 3.5. Emergency Services. A party may provide aid upon request of the other party in the event of a man-made disaster, natural disaster or other act of God. Emergency services includes all those services as the parties mutually agree are necessary to plan for, prepare for, deal with, and recover from emergency situations. These services include, without limitation, planning, engineering, construction, maintenance, and removal and disposal services related to things such as road closures, traffic control, debris removal, flood protection and mitigation, sign repair, sandbag activities and general cleanup. Work will be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work, and work must be supervised by a qualified employee of the party performing the work. If it is not feasible to have an executed work order prior to performance of the work, the parties will promptly confer to determine whether work may be commenced without a fully- executed work order in place. If work commences without a fully- executed work order, the parties will follow up with execution of a work order as soon as feasible. 3.6. When a need is identified, the State and the Local Government will discuss the proposed work and the resources needed to perform the work. If a party desires to perform such work, the parties will negotiate the specific and detailed work tasks and cost. The State will then prepare a work order contract. Generally, a work order contract will be limited to one specific Page 3 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 project/engagement, although "on call" work orders may be prepared for certain types of services, especially for "Technical Services" items as identified section 2.1.2. The work order will also identify specific deliverables required, and timeframes for completing work. A work order must be fully executed by the parties prior to work being commenced. The Local Government will not be paid for work performed prior to execution of a work order and authorization by the State. 4. Responsibilities of the Providing Party The party requesting the work will be referred to as the "Requesting Party" and the party performing the work will be referred to as the "Providing Party". Each work order will set forth particular requirements for that project/engagement. 4.1. Terms Applicable to ALL Work Orders The terms in this section 4.1 will apply to ALL work orders. 4.1.1. Each work order will identify an Authorized Representative for each party. Each party's authorized representative is responsible for administering the work order, and has the authority to make any decisions regarding the work, and to give and receive any notices required or permitted under this Master Contract or the work order. 4.1.2. The Providing Party will furnish and assign a publicly employed licensed engineer (Project Engineer), to be in responsible charge of the project(s) and to supervise and direct the work to be performed under each work order. For services not requiring an engineer, the Providing Party will furnish and assign another responsible employee to be in charge of the project. The services of the Providing Party under a work order may not be otherwise assigned, sublet, or transferred unless approved in writing by the Requesting Party's authorized representative. This written consent will in no way relieve the Providing Party from its primary responsibility for the work. 4.1.3. If the Local Government is the Providing Party, the Project Engineer may request in writing specific engineering and/or technical services from the State, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 161.39. The work order may require the Local Government to deposit payment in advance or may, at the State's option, permit payment in arrears. If the State furnishes the services requested, the Local Government will promptly pay the State to reimburse the. state trunk highway fund for the full cost and expense of furnishing such services. The costs and expenses will include the current State labor additives and overhead rates, subject to adjustment based on actual direct costs that have been verified by audit. 4.1.4. Only the receipt of a fully executed work order contract authorizes the Providing Party to begin work on a project. Any and all effort, expenses, or actions taken by the Providing Party before the work order contract is fully executed is considered unauthorized and undertaken at the risk of non - payment. 4.1.5. In connection with the performance of this contract and any work orders issued hereunder, the Providing Agency will comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations. When the Providing Party is authorized or permitted to award contracts in connection with any work order, the Providing Party will require and cause its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all Federal and State laws and regulations. 4.2. Additional Terms for Roadway Maintenance. The terms of section 4.1 and this section 4.2 will apply to all work orders for Roadway Maintenance. 4.2.1. Unless otherwise provided for by agreement or work order, the Providing Party must obtain all permits and sanctions that may be required for the proper and lawful performance of the work. Page 4 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 4.2.2. The Providing Party must perform maintenance in accordance with MnDOT maintenance manuals, policies and operations. 4.2.3. The Providing Party must use State - approved materials, including (by way of example and without limitation), sign posts, sign sheeting, and de -icing and anti -icing chemicals. 4.3. Additional Terms for Construction Administration. The terms of section 4.1 and this section 4.3 will apply to all work orders for construction administration. 4.3.1. Contract(s) must be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder or best value proposer in accordance with state law. 4.3.2. Contractor(s) must be required to post payment and performance bonds in an amount equal to the contract amount. The Providing Party will take all necessary action to make claims against such bonds in the event of any default by the contractor. 4.3.3. Contractor(s) must be required to perform work in accordance with the latest edition of the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction. 4.3.4. For work performed on State right -of -way, contractor(s) must be required to indemnify and hold the State harmless against any loss incurred with respect to the performance of the contracted work, and must be required to provide evidence of insurance coverage commensurate with project risk. 4.3.5. Contractor(s) must pay prevailing wages pursuant to applicable state and federal law. 4.3.6. Contractor(s) must comply with all applicable Federal, and State laws, ordinances and regulations, including but not limited to applicable human rights /anti - discrimination laws and laws concerning the participation of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in federally - assisted contracts 4.3.7. If the providing party is a Local Government, the Local Government will, without cost or expense to the State, obtain all rights of way, easements, construction permits and any other permits and sanctions that may be required in connection with the local and trunk highway portions of the contract construction. Before payment by the State, the Local Government will furnish the State with certified copies of the documents for rights of way and easements, construction permits and other permits and sanctions required for State cost participation construction covered under this Agreement. 4.3.8. The Providing Party may approve minor changes to the Requesting Party's portion of the project work if such changes do not increase the Requesting Party's cost obligation under the applicable work order. 4.3.9. The Providing Party will not approve any contractor claims for additional compensation without the Requesting Party's written approval, and the execution of a proper amendment to the applicable work order when necessary. The Local Government will tender the processing and defense of any such claims to the State upon the State's request. 4.3.10. The Local Government must coordinate all trunk highway work affecting any utilities with the State's Utilities Office. 4.3.11. The Providing Party must coordinate all necessary detours with the Requesting Party. 4.3.12. If the Local Government is the Providing Party, and there is work performed on the trunk highway right -of -way, the following will apply: 4.3.12.1 The Local Government will have a permit to perform the work on the trunk highway. The State may revoke this permit if the work is not being performed Page 5 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 in a safe, proper and skillful manner, or if the contractor is violating the terms of any law, regulation, or permit applicable to the work. The State will have no liability to the Local Government, or its contractor, if work is suspended or stopped due to any such condition or concern. 4.3.12.2 The Local Government will require its contractor to conduct all traffic control in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 4.3.12.3 The Local Government will require its contractor to comply with the terms of all permits issued for the project including, but not limited to, NPDES and other environmental permits. 4.3.12.4 All improvements constructed on the State's right -of -way will become the property of the State. 5. Responsibilities of the Requesting Party 5.1. After authorizing the Providing Party to begin work, the Requesting Party will furnish any data or material in its possession relating to the project that may be of use to the Providing Party in performing the work. 5.2. All such data furnished to the Providing Party will remain the property of the Requesting Party and will be promptly returned upon the Requesting Party's request or upon the expiration or termination of this contract (subject to data retention requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and other applicable law). 5.3. The Providing Party will analyze all such data furnished by the Requesting Party. If the Providing Party finds any such data to be incorrect or incomplete, the Providing Party will bring the facts to the attention of the Requesting Party before proceeding with the part of the project affected. The Providing Party will investigate the matter, and if it finds that such data is incorrect or incomplete, it will promptly determine a method for furnishing corrected data. Delay in furnishing data will not be considered justification for an adjustment in compensation. 5.4. The State will provide to the Local Government copies of any Trunk Highway fund clauses to be included in the bid solicitation and will provide any required Trunk Highway fund provisions to be included in the Proposal for Highway Construction, that are different from those required for State Aid construction. 5.5. The Requesting Party will perform final reviews and/or inspections of its portion of the project work. If the work is found to have been completed in accordance with the work order contract, the Requesting Party will promptly release any remaining funds due the Providing Party for the Project(s). 5.6. The work order contracts may include additional responsibilities to be completed by the Requesting Party. 6. Time In the performance of project work under a work order contract, time is of the essence. 7. Consideration and Payment 7.1. Consideration. The Requesting Party will pay the Providing Party as specified in the work order. The State's normal and customary labor additives will apply to work performed by the State, unless otherwise specified in the work order. The State's normal and customary labor additives will not apply if the parties agree to a "lump sum" or "unit rate" payment. Page 6 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 7.2. State's Maximum Obligation. The total compensation to be paid by the State to the Local Government under all work order contracts issued pursuant to this Master Contract will not exceed $100,000.00. 7.3. Travel Expenses. It is anticipated that all travel expenses will be included in the base cost of the Providing Party's services, and unless otherwise specifically set forth in an applicable work order, the Providing Party will not be separately reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred by the Providing Party in performing any work order contract. In those cases where the State agrees to reimburse travel expenses, such expenses will be reimbursed in the same manner and in no greater amount than provided in the current "MnDOT Travel Regulations" a copy of which is on file with and available from the MnDOT District Office. The Local Government will not be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred outside of Minnesota unless it has received the State's prior written approval for such travel. 7.4. Payment. 7.4.1. Generally. The Requesting Party will pay the Providing Party as specified in the applicable work order, and will make prompt payment in accordance with Minnesota law. 7.4.2. Payment by the Local Government. 7.4.2.1. The Local Government will make payment to the order of the Commissioner of Transportation. 7.4.2.2. IMPORTANT NOTE: PAYMENT MUST REFERENCE THE "MNDOT CONTRACT NUMBER" SHOWN ON THE FACE PAGE OF THIS CONTRACT AND THE "INVOICE NUMBER" ON THE INVOICE RECEIVED FROM MNDOT. 7.4.2.3. Remit payment to the address below: MnDOT Attn: Cash Accounting RE: MnDOT Contract Number 02636 and Invoice Number # # # # ## Mail Stop 215 395 John Ireland Blvd St. Paul, MN 55155 7.4.3. Payment by the State. 7.4.3.1. Generally. The State will promptly pay the Local Government after the Local Government presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be submitted as specified in the applicable work order, but no more frequently than monthly. 7.4.3.2. Retainage for Professional and Technical Services. For work orders for professional and technical services, as required by Minn. Stat. § 16C.08, subd.. 5(b), no more than 90 percent of the amount due under any work order contract may be paid until the final product of the work order contract has been reviewed by the State's authorized representative. The balance due will be paid when the State's authorized representative determines that the Local Government has satisfactorily fulfilled all the terms of the work order contract. Page 7 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11 /02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 8. Conditions of Payment 02636 All work performed by the Providing Party under a work order contract must be performed to the Requesting Party's satisfaction, as determined at the sole and reasonable discretion of the Requesting Party's Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws, rules, and regulations. The Providing Party will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal or state law. 9. Local Government's Authorized Representative and Project Manager; Authority to Execute Work Order Contracts 9.1. The Local Government's Authorized Representative for administering this master contract is the Local Government's Engineer, and the Engineer has the responsibility to monitor the Local Government's performance. The Local Government's Authorized Representative is also authorized to execute work order contracts on behalf of the Local Government without approval of each proposed work order contract by its governing body. 9.2. The Local Government's Project Manager will be identified in each work order contract. 10. State's Authorized Representative and Project Manager 10.1. The State's Authorized Representative for this master contract is the District State Aid Engineer, who has the responsibility to monitor the State's performance. 10.2. The State's Project Manager will be identified in each work order contract. 11. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Contract Complete 11.1. Assignment. Neither party may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Master Contract or any work order contract without the prior consent of the other and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this Master Contract, or their successors in office. 11.2. Amendments. Any amendment to this master contractor any work order contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original contract, or their successors in office. 11.3. Waiver. If a party fails to enforce any provision of this master contract or any work order contract, that failure does not waive the provision or the party's right to subsequently enforce it. 11.4. Contract Complete. This master contract and any work order contract contain all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Local Government. No other understanding regarding this master contract or any work order contract issued hereunder, whether written or oral may be used to bind either party. 12. Liability. Each party will be responsible for its own acts and omissions to the extent provided by law. The Local Government's liability is governed by Minnesota Statutes chapter 466 and other applicable law. The State's liability is governed by Minnesota Statutes section 3.736 and other applicable law. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies a party may have for the other party's failure to fulfill its obligations under this master contract or any work order contract. Neither party agrees to assume any environmental liability on behalf of the other party. A Providing Party under any work order is acting only as a "Contractor" to the Requesting Party, as the term "Contractor" is defined in Minnesota Statutes § 11513.03 (subd. 10), and is entitled to the protections afforded to a "Contractor" by the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act. The parties specifically intend that Minnesota Statutes §471.59 subdivision 1 a will apply to any work undertaken under this Master Contract and any work order issued hereunder. Page 8 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 13. State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the parry's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to any work order contract are subject to examination by the parties and by the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this Master Contract. 14. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property 14.1. Government Data Practices. The Local Government and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this Master Contract and any work order contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Local Government under this Master Contract and any work order contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Local Government or the State. 14.2. Intellectual Property Rights 14.2.1. Intellectual Property Rights. The Requesting Party will own all rights, title, and interest in all of the intellectual property rights, including copyrights, patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and service marks in the Works and Documents created and paid for under work order contracts. Works means all inventions, improvements, discoveries (whether or not patentable), databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, and disks conceived, reduced to practice, created or originated by the Providing Party, its employees, agents, and subcontractors, either individually or jointly with others in the performance of this master contract or any work order contract. Works includes "Documents." Documents are the originals of any databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, disks, or other materials, whether in tangible or electronic forms, prepared by the Providing Party, its employees, agents, or contractors, in the performance of a work order contract. The Documents will be the exclusive property of the Requesting Party and all such Documents must be immediately returned to the Requesting Party by the Providing Party upon completion or cancellation of the work order contract. To the extent possible, those Works eligible for copyright protection under the United States Copyright Act will be deemed to be "works made for hire." The Providing Party Government assigns all right, title, and interest it may have in the Works and the Documents to the Requesting Party. The Providing Party must, at the request of the Requesting Party, execute all papers and perform all other acts necessary to transfer or record the Requesting Party's ownership interest in the Works and Documents. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Requesting Party grants the Providing Party an irrevocable and royalty -free license to use such intellectual for its own non - commercial purposes, including dissemination to political subdivisions of the state of Minnesota and to transportation- related agencies such as the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 14.2.2. Obligations with Respect to Intellectual Property. 14.2.2.1. Notification. Whenever any invention, improvement, or discovery (whether or not patentable) is made or conceived for the first time or actually or constructively reduced to practice by the Providing Party, including its employees and subcontractors, in the performance of the work order contract, the Providing Party will immediately give the Requesting Party's Authorized Representative written notice thereof, and must promptly furnish the Page 9of14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 Authorized Representative with complete information and/or disclosure thereon. 14.2.2.2. Representation. The Providing Party must perform all acts, and take all steps necessary to ensure that all intellectual property rights in the Works and Documents are the sole property of the Requesting Party, and that neither Providing Party nor its employees, agents or contractors retain any interest in and to the Works and Documents. 15. Affirmative Action The State intends to carry out its responsibility for requiring affirmative action by its Contractors, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §363A.36. Pursuant to that Statute, the Local Government is encouraged to prepare and implement an affirmative action plan for the employment of minority persons, women, and the qualified disabled, and submit such plan to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. In addition, when the Local Government lets a contract for the performance of work under a work order issued pursuant to this Master Contract, it must include the following in the bid or proposal solicitation and any contracts awarded as a result thereof: 15.1. Covered Contracts and Contractors. If the Contract exceeds $100,000 and the Contractor employed more than 40 full -time employees on a single working day during the previous 12 months in Minnesota or in the state where it has its principle place of business, then the Contractor must comply with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 and Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400 - 5000.3600. A Contractor covered by Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 because it employed more than 40 full -time employees in another state and does not have a certificate of compliance, must certify that it is in compliance with federal affirmative action requirements. 15.2. Minn. Stat. § 363A.36. Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 requires the Contractor to have an affirmative action plan for the employment of minority persons, women, and qualified disabled individuals approved by the Minnesota Commissioner of Human Rights ( "Commissioner ") as indicated by a certificate of compliance. The law addresses suspension or revocation of a certificate of compliance and contract consequences in that event. A contract awarded without a certificate of compliance may be voided. 15.3. Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400 - 5000.3600. 15.3.1. General. Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400 - 5000.3600 implement Minn. Stat. § 363A.36. These rules include, but are not limited to, criteria for contents, approval, and implementation of affirmative action plans; procedures for issuing certificates of compliance and criteria for determining a contractor's compliance status; procedures for addressing deficiencies, sanctions, and notice and hearing; annual compliance reports; procedures for compliance review; and contract consequences for non - compliance. The specific criteria for approval or rejection of an affirmative action plan are contained in various provisions of Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400 - 5000.3600 including, but not limited to, parts 5000.3420 - 5000.3500 and 5000.3552 - 5000.3559. 15.3.2. Disabled Workers. The Contractor must comply with the following affirmative action requirements for disabled workers: 15.3.2.1. The Contractor must not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of physical or mental disability in regard to any position for which the employee or applicant for employment is qualified. The Contractor agrees to take affirmative action to employ, advance in employment, and otherwise treat qualified disabled persons without discrimination based upon their physical or mental disability in all employment Page 10 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 practices such as the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment, advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 15.3.2.2. The Contractor agrees to comply with the rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights issued pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act. 15.3.2.3. In the event of the Contractor's noncompliance with the requirements of this clause, actions for noncompliance may be taken in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 363A.36, and the rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights issued pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act. 15.3.2.4. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices in a form to be prescribed by the commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. Such notices must state the Contractor's obligation under the law to take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment qualified disabled employees and applicants for employment, and the rights of applicants and employees. 15.3.2.5. The Contractor must notify each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract understanding, that the Contractor is bound by the terms of Minnesota Statutes Section 363A.36, of the Minnesota Human Rights Act and is committed to take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment physically and mentally disabled persons. 15.3.3. Consequences. The consequences for the Contractor's failure to implement its affirmative action plan or make a good faith effort to do so include, but are not limited to, suspension or revocation of a certificate of compliance by the Commissioner, refusal by the Commissioner to approve subsequent plans, and termination of all or part of this contract by the Commissioner or the State. 15.3.4. Certification. The Contractor hereby certifies that it is in compliance with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 363.073 and Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400 - 5000.3600 and is aware of the consequences for noncompliance. 16. Workers' Compensation Each party will be responsible for its own employees for any workers compensation claims. This Master Contract, and any work orders issued hereunder, are not intended to constitute an interchange of government employees under Minnesota Statutes § 15.53. To the extent that this Master Contract, or any work order issued hereunder, is determined to be subject to Minnesota Statutes § 15.53, such statute will control to the extent of any conflict between the Contract and the statute. 17. Publicity 17.1. Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of a work order contract where the State is the Requesting Party must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State's Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Local Government individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from a work order contract. Page 11 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11 /02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 17.2. Data Practices Act. Section 17.1 is not intended to override the Local Government's responsibilities under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. 18. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice -of -law provisions, governs this master contract and all work order contracts. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this master contract or any work order contracts, or the breach of any such contracts, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 19. Prompt Payment; Payment to Subcontractors The parties must make prompt payment of their obligations in accordance with applicable law. As required by Minn. Stat. § 16A.1245, when the Local Government lets a contract for work pursuant to any work order, the Local Government must require its contractor to pay all subcontractors, less any retainage, within 10 calendar days of the prime contractor's receipt of payment from the Local Government for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor(s) and must pay interest at the rate of one and one -half percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor(s) on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor(s). 20. Minn. Stat. § 181.59. The Local Government will comply with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 181.59 which requires: Every contract for or on behalf of the state of Minnesota, or any county, city, town, township, school, school district, or any other district in the state, for materials, supplies, or construction shall contain provisions by which the Contractor agrees: (1) That, in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract, or any subcontract, no contractor, material supplier, or vendor, shall, by reason of race, creed, or color, discriminate against the person or persons who are citizens of the United States or resident aliens who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates; (2) That no contractor, material supplier, or vendor, shall, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in clause (1) of this section, or on being hired, prevent, or conspire to prevent, the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed, or color; (3) That a violation of this section is a misdemeanor; and (4) That this contract may be canceled or terminated by the state, county, city, town, school board, or any other person authorized to grant the contracts for employment, and all money due, or to become due under the contract, may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions of this contract. 21. Termination; Suspension 21.1. Termination by the State for Convenience. The State or commissioner of Administration may cancel this Master Contract and any work order contracts at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written notice to the Local Government. Upon termination, the Local Government and the State will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. 21.2. Termination by the Local Government for Convenience. The Local Government may cancel this Master Contract and any work order contracts at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written notice to the State. Upon termination, the Local Government and the State will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. 21.3. Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate or suspend this Master Contract and any work order contract if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota legislature or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination or suspension must be by written or fax notice to the Local Government. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination or suspension. However, the Local Page 12 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 Government will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the master contract or work order is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota legislature or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the Local Government notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State's receiving that notice. 22. Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. § 270.66, and other applicable law, the Local Government consents to disclosure of its federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Local Government to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. 23. Defense of Claims and Lawsuits If any lawsuit or claim is filed by a third party (including but not limited to the Local Government's contractors and subcontractors), arising out of trunk highway work performed pursuant to a valid work order issued under this Master Contract, the Local Government will, at the discretion of and upon the request of the State, tender the defense of such claims to the State or allow the State to participate in the defense of such claims. The Local Government will, however, be solely responsible for defending any lawsuit or claim, or any portion thereof, when the claim or cause of action asserted is based on its own acts or omissions in performing or supervising the work. The Local Government will not purport to represent the State in any litigation, settlement, or alternative dispute resolution process. The State will not be responsible for any judgment entered against the Local Government, and will not be bound by the terms of any settlement entered into by the Local Government except with the written approval of the Attorney General and the Commissioner of Transportation and pursuant to applicable law. 24. Additional Provisions [The balance of this page has intentionally been left blank — signature page follows] Page 13 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) LOCAL GOVERNMENT The Local Government certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the contract on behalf of the Local Government as required by applicable ordinance, resolution, or charter provision. By: Title: Date: By: Title Date: CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 11/02/2012) MnDOT Agreement # 02636 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION (with delegated authority) Title Division Director Date: Date: Page 14 of 14 COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION As delegated to Materials Management Division City Council Agenda — 12/12/2016 Consideration of a request for a Conditional Use Permit for vehicle sales and rental, a Conditional Use Permit for minor auto repair, a Conditional Use Permit for Open sales /display, a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Outdoor Commercial — Entertainment / Recreation and a request for Rezoning from B -4, Regional Business to B -3, Highway Business, Applicant: Larson Building /Moon Motors. (NAC) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 2, Otter Creek Crossing Addition. PID: 155- 177 - 001010 Address: 3613 Chelsea Rd Planning Case Number: 2016 -047 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): 1. Conditional Use Permit for Vehicle Sales and Rental 2. Conditional Use Permit for Minor Vehicle Repair 3. Conditional Use Permit for Open Sales/Display 4. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Outdoor Commercial — Entertainment / Recreation 5. Rezoning from B -4 to B -3 6. Variance to setback requirements for automobile repair in front of the front building line. (Approved by the Planning Commission on 1216116) Deadline for Decision: December 29th, 2016 (60 days) February 27th, 2017 (including 60 -day extension) Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: B -4, Regional Business District The purpose of the "B -4," Regional Business District is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. Overlays /Environmental Regulations Applicable: N/A Current Site Use: Retail — Sales and Service Surrounding Land Uses: North: B -3, Highway Business District (across I -94) City Council Agenda — 12/12/2016 East: B -3, Highway Business District South: Vacant I -2, Heavy Industrial District West: Vacant B -4, Regional Business District Project Description and Background: Moon Motorsports is a retailer and service center for motorsport vehicles and accessories that services the Monticello region. The business currently occupies the site at 3613 Chelsea Rd. The site has a 24,493 square -foot building which Moon Motorsports currently owns and occupies. The applicant seeks to build an expansion to the building of 8,230 square feet, as well as additional outdoor service area. The new building will total 32,723 square feet. The site is zoned B -4, Regional Business District. The purpose of the "B -4," Regional Business District is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. Moon Motorsports as a retail use is an allowed use in the B -4 District. However, under the changes to the zoning ordinance in the past several years, the vehicle service aspects of the use are no longer allowed in the B -4 District. Thus, the applicant is seeking an amendment to the B -3 District as a part of the project, and as discussed below. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission reviewed the application requests and held a public hearing on the same on December 6th, 2016. The Planning Commission inquired as to the zoning of the property relative to other recent rezonings in the area. Planner Steve Grittman explained that the B -3 zoning is consistent with the "Places to Shop" designation of the comprehensive plan and reflects the vehicle - oriented use specific to the site. The applicant was present to address the Commission. Joel Erickson, Moon Motorsports, clarified that the southern-most parking area would be primarily for employee parking and circulation, with the northern and eastern lots used for customer parking. No other members of the public were present to address the item. Council member Gabler requested that staff address the outdoor storage and outdoor sales uses. It was noted that while outdoor storage is not permitted within commercial zoning districts, outdoor sales and display is allowed by CUP in the B -3 district in which the site is located, thus the application request for consideration. The Planning Commission recommended the rezoning and conditional use permits unanimously. Acting in their capacity as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, the Planning Commission approved the request for a variance to permit automobile repair (and the accessory storage) beyond the front building line. 2 City Council Agenda — 12/12/2016 ANALYSIS The applicants are seeking to amend their conditional use permits to expand their existing building at 3613 Chelsea Rd. The site currently holds several CUPs for sales, service and testing. The applicants also propose to expand an outdoor service area for vehicle service and repair. Currently, the site contains a fenced in area on the south side of the building that's used for outdoor storage serving the vehicle service uses indoors. The area is screened on all sides. As noted above, the various applications necessary to accommodate the proposal are as follows: 1. Conditional Use Permit for vehicle sales and rental 2. Conditional Use Permit for Minor Vehicle Repair 3. Conditional Use Permit for Open sales /display 4. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Outdoor Commercial — Entertainment / Recreation 5. Rezoning from B -4 to B -3 6. Variance to setback requirements for automobile repair in front of the front building line. The variance was approved by the Planning Commission acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals on December 0, 2016. Rezon ing- — B -4 To B -3 District The site is currently zoned B -4, Regional Business District, and is 5.15 acres in lot area. The applicants are seeking to rezone the property to B -3, Highway Business District. The purpose of the rezone is to allow the expansion of the minor vehicle repair onsite. Currently, the applicants operate a minor vehicle repair service as a non - conforming use. It should be noted that this business came in under a different zoning ordinance. To expand the minor vehicle repair area on site, the applicants are requesting a rezoning. The new zoning will be consistent with zoning to the north and southeast of the site, as well as with the Comprehensive Plan. It should also be noted that staff is proposing to remove the CUP provision for vehicle sales and rental in the B -4 district, meaning that B -3 would be the only viable district for the existing facility. The purpose statement for the B -3 District is as follows: The purpose of the `B -3 " (highway business) district is to provide for limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. 3 City Council Agenda — 12/12/2016 Conditional Use Permit— Vehicle Sales And Rental The current zoning ordinance language allows vehicle sales and rentals in the B -4 District by conditional use with the following conditions: (a) The minimum building size (for parcels greater than 4 acres) for any vehicle sales or rental use shall be 40,000 square feet, or 15% of the lot area, which ever requires the larger building. Staff Comment: As noted, the lot area is 5.15 acres in area. The existing building is 24,493 square -feet, a lot coverage of about 11 percent. This building was approved and constructed under the City's previous zoning ordinance, and is legally non - conforming. After the expansion, the building will be a total of 32,723 square -feet, and stand at 14.6% lot coverage. This condition lessens the non - conformity and is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. (b) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened with an opaque buffer (Table 4 -2, Buffer Type "D ") in accordance with section 4.1(G) of this ordinance. Staff Comment: The site does not abut a residential use. (c) All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 4.4 of this ordinance. Staff Comment: The applicant has submitted a lighting photometric plan which shows a 0.0 foot - candle measurement along all lot lines, meeting the maximum of 1.0 foot - candles. (d) The outside sales and display area shall be hard surfaced. Staff Comment: The site has an existing outdoor sales and display area on the northeast side of the property. The applicant is not proposing any changes to this area. (e) The outside sales and display area does not utilize parking spaces which are required for conformance with this ordinance. Staff Comment: The site has an existing outdoor sales and display area on the northeast side of the property. The applicant is not proposing any changes to this area. (f) Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement and shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. 4 City Council Agenda — 12/12/2016 Staff Comment: The current site has one vehicular access point for all customers and deliveries. The applicants are proposing a new access for truck deliveries on the southwest part of the property. The access will be 24 feet wide. The City Engineer should comment on the location and acceptability of the proposed curb cut. (g) There is a minimum lot area of twenty -two thousand five hundred (22,500) square feet and minimum lot dimensions of one hundred fifty (15 0) feet by one hundred thirty (130) feet. Staff Comment: The site is 224,500 square -feet and is dimensioned at approximately 428 feet by 540 feet. The site meets the requirements for size, width and depth. (h) A drainage system subject to the approval of the Community Development Department shall be installed. Staff Comment: This is subject to further comment by the City Engineer. Conditional Use Perm it— Min orVehicle Repair In conjunction with the request to rezone the property, the applicants are seeking an amendment to their conditional use permit to expand this area. Currently, the area is 5,400 square feet, the applicants seek to add 5,050 square feet of additional space. Section 5.2(F)(3) of the zoning ordinance outlines the following criteria for minor vehicle repair: (a) The use shall be designed to ensure proper functioning of the site as related to vehicle stacking, circulation, and turning movements. Staff Comment: The site will be enclosed by a fence that will also act as screening. The applicants shall provide a narrative that describes how vehicles will enter and exit the service area. (b) Repair of all vehicles shall occur within an enclosed building. Temporary outdoor vehicle storage may be allowed in an outdoor storage area that is no larger than 25 percent of the buildable area of the lot, is located behind the front building line of the principal structure, and is screened with a wooden fence or masonry wall in accordance with Section 4.3, Fences & Walls. Staff Comment: The applicants are seeking a variance from this section of the code. The area will maintain a large setback from the street (over 100 feet), and will be buffered from the street with a parking lot and drainage area. The variance is examined below. 5 City Council Agenda — 12/12/2016 (c) If gasoline is sold on -site, the use shall also comply with the standards for Vehicle Fuel Sales as regulated by this ordinance. Staff Comment: The applicants have not proposed gasoline sales. (d) Vehicles not being repaired but used as a source of parts shall be prohibited unless full enclosed within a building. Staff Comment. The applicants are not proposing this type of storage, with the exception of a temporary holding area for waste parts that was approved as a part of the original permitting. No changes to this area are proposed. (e) Vehicles that are repaired and are awaiting removal shall not be stored or parked for more than 30 consecutive days. In cases where a vehicle is abandoned by its lawful owner before or during the repair process, the vehicle may remain on site as long as is necessary after the 30 day period, provided the owner or operator of the establishment demonstrates steps have been taken to remove the vehicle from the premises using the appropriate legal means. Staff Comment: The applicants are not proposing any storage options for vehicles, either for service or off season storage. Conditional Use Permit— Outdoor Commercial — Entertainment /Recreation The site contains a test track area that is oval and is made of crushed rock. The test track area was allowed in under a conditional use permit in 2006. The current regulations permit accessory outdoor commercial recreation by Conditional Use Permit under the following conditions: (a) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened with at least a semi - opaque buffer (Table 4 -2, Buffer Type "C ") in accordance with section 4.1(G) of this ordinance. (b) Adequate measures to contain the proposed activity on the subject site shall be provided. (c) Dust and noise are controlled consistent with City Ordinance. The applicant's current "test track" extended onto adjoining property. Under the new application, it will be contained on the applicant's property. No residential uses abut the property. The applicant should describe the measures to contain the track, and ensure that dust and erosion do not raise issues for the site or the adjoining road or properties. Variance Amendment — Vehicle Service As stated above, the applicants are seeking a variance that allows vehicle service in the front of the building. The new plan proposes to extend an existing open storage G City Council Agenda — 12/12/2016 area to the south, toward Chelsea Road, which is the front yard portion of the property. As such, the applicants need a variance to proceed with this part of their expansion plan. For variance consideration, the applicants must show that they are proposing a reasonable use under the code, but that there are unique conditions on the property that create practical difficulties in complying with the zoning regulation in question. In this case, the proposed area will constitute far less than the maximum size for such uses — less than 5% lot coverage (well within the maximum 25% under the applicable regulation). However, due to the layout of the property, with frontage on Chelsea Road, but with exposure to I -94, the location of the storage area fits more appropriately on the south side of the building. Moreover, the applicant's current site includes a screening fence, and a planting of evergreen trees that screen and buffer the area from view of Chelsea Road. By relocating the fence and these trees, the applicant could meet the intent of the code, which is to minimize the view of these areas, and still accommodate the expansion proposed. Staff believes that the test for variance is met in this case, with the unique condition being the configuration of the property in relation to surrounding roadways and existing building improvements, which pre- dated the current zoning restriction. Site Plan Review Parking and Circulation The applicants have provided a parking plan that shows 112 parking spaces proposed; 35 of which are new spaces. The applicants have indicated that they will have 8,230 square feet of new building space, of which 3,930 square feet will be warehouse and 3,975 square feet will be showroom. By code, the site should have 105 parking spaces. The plan is consistent with the requirements. Location and Design of Required Parking The applicants are proposing to add 35 parking spaces with this addition. The site plan does not detail the width or depth of the parking stalls. The applicants have confirmed via revised site plan that the new parking spaces are at a minimum of 9 feet wide and 20 feet deep. Curb Cuts and Access (i) Each property shall be allowed one (1) curb cut access per one hundred twenty -five (125) feet of street frontage. All property shall be entitled to at least one (1) curb cut. 7 City Council Agenda — 12/12/2016 StaffComment: The site currently has one curb cut. The proposed expansion will add a second curb cut to the west of the existing curb cut. Both curb cuts will access Chelsea Road. The curb cuts are over 125 feet away from each other, along a frontage of approximately 425 feet. (ii) The maximum driveway width between the public street and the property line shall not exceed twenty -four (24) feet. Staff Comment: The proposed new access will be 24 feet wide which is compliant with this provision. Loading The applicant is proposing a new location for receiving incoming shipments which faces Chelsea Road aligned with the new curb cut. The gate area is not configured as a loading dock, and will permit trucks to enter the fence receiving area. Landscaping The site is properly landscaped with shrubs around the new walls of the building. The site also includes maple trees to be planted along the parking lot closest to Chelsea Road. As noted in the variance discussion, staff recommends that the existing double row of evergreen trees be relocated to the front of the new screen fence location along the expanded open storage area. With this adjustment, staff believes the landscape plan meets the requirements of the City, accounting for existing and proposed plantings. Sign Regulations The applicants have not submitted a sign plan. The existing signs on site are expected to remain the same and any new signage shall be required to meet ordinance requirements. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The applicant is seeking a number of approvals to accommodate the proposed expansion. The approvals are as follows: 1. Rezoning from B -4 to B -3 2. Conditional Use Permit for vehicle sales and rental 3. Conditional Use Permit for Minor Vehicle Repair 4. Conditional Use Permit for Open sales /display 5. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Outdoor Commercial — Entertainment / Recreation 6. Variance to setback requirements for automobile repair in front of the front building line. City Council Agenda — 12/12/2016 Decision 1. Rezone from B -4, Regional Business District to B -3 Highway Business District The Planning Commission recommends alternative I below. 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 656 for rezoning from B -4 (Regional Business District) to B -3 (Highway Business District) for Lot 1, Block 2, Otter Creek Crossing based on the findings in Resolution No. PC- 2016 -041. 2. Motion to deny Ordinance No. 656 for rezoning from B -4, Regional Business District to B -3 Highway Business District for Lot 1, Block 2, Otter Creek Crossing based on the findings to be made by the City Council. Motion to table action on the request and continue the hearing, based on findings to be stated at the hearing. Decision 2. Conditional Use Permits for (A) Vehicle Sales and Rental, (B) Minor Vehicle Repair, (C) Open Sales and Display, and (D) Accessory Outdoor Commercial — Entertainment / Recreation. The Planning Commission recommends alternative I below. Motion to approve Conditional Use Permits for (A) Vehicle Sales and Rental, (B) Minor Vehicle Repair, (C) Open Sales and Display, and (D) Accessory Outdoor Commercial — Entertainment / Recreation. Based on the findings in Resolution No. PC- 2016 -042, and the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny the Conditional Use Permits for (A) Vehicle Sales and Rental, (B) Minor Vehicle Repair, (C) Open Sales and Display, and (D) Accessory Outdoor Commercial — Entertainment / Recreation. Based on the findings in Resolution No. PC- 2016 -042, and the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z. Motion to table action on the request and continue the hearing, based on findings to be stated by the City Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the site and building plans; conditional use permits, and based on findings in the related resolutions and subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z. The B -3 District is the most appropriate district for this principal and series of accessory uses, and other changes to the code may make the B -4 District impractical for vehicle - related business. L City Council Agenda — 12/12/2016 The Conditional Use Permits are each consistent with the expectations of the district and the location, with the conditions noted for full compliance. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Ordinance 656, draft B. Resolution No. PC- 2016 -041 (Request to Rezone) C. Resolution No. PC- 2016 -042 (Conditional Use Permit) D. Aerial Image, Subject Site E. Applicant Narrative F. Application Plan Sets, Including: 1. Title Page 2. General Notes and Specifications 3. Standard City Detail 4. Grading Plan 5. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 6. Paving Plan 7. Landscape Plan 8. Site Plan 9. Floor Plan 10. Building Elevations 11. Certificate of Survey 12. Revised Site Plan 13. Photometric Plan 14. Stormwater Calculations G. Site Circulation Images H. City Engineer's Letter, dated 11/29/16 I. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpts Z. Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Moon Motorsports 3360 Chelsea Road Lot 1, Block 2, Otter Creek Crossing PID: 155- 177 - 001010 1. The applicants shall provide a narrative that describes how vehicles will enter and exit the service area. 2. The landscaping plan shall be modified to move (or replant) the existing evergreen tree buffer along the outdoor storage fence line facing Chelsea Road. 10 City Council Agenda — 12/12/2016 3. The applicant shall provide a narrative detailing the efforts to control dust and drainage that may be generated by use of the "test track ". 4. The approvals granted under these resolutions do not factor future changes or additions, which shall separate review and approvals under the applicable regulations at the time of the change. 5. The applicant shall comply with the terms of the City Engineer's letter dated November 30th, 2016. 6. The applicant has identified a future building beyond the current improvements to the site. The future building addition and the current improvements will create more than 1 acre of new impervious surface, therefore if a future building addition does occur, the infiltration basins will likely need to be enlarged to meet City and the MN Stormwater Manual volume reduction standards at that time. 7. Comments and recommendations of other City staff. 11 ORDINANCE NO. 656 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B -4, GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO B -3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, OTTER CREEK CROSSING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0 HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from B -4, General Business to B -3, Highway Business: PID NUMBER: 155- 177 - 001010 (See attached Legal Description) Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 12th day of December, 2016. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 656 ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -041 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REZONING FROM B -4, GENERAL BUSINESS TO B -3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS TO ACCOMMODATE THE DEVELOPMENT AND EXPANSION OF A VEHICLE SALES AND RENTAL FACILITY AND RELATED USES WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to operate and expand a vehicle sales and rental facility with accessory minor vehicle service, open storage, and accessory outdoor commercial recreation for a test track; and WHEREAS, a portion of the subject property is currently zoned B -4, General Business, which does not allow vehicle sales and service uses as proposed; and WHEREAS, the subject property is proposed to be zoned B -3, Highway Business, in which vehicle sales and rental, as well as the proposed accessory uses are allowed by conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed construction is consistent with the relevant general and conditional zoning requirements of the B -3 District; and WHEREAS, the remaining site and building improvements on the subject property consistent with the B -3 District requirements; and WHEREAS, the subject property is guided for "Places to Shop" in the official Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the matter at its regular meeting on December 6th, 2016 and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed rezoning will meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed rezoning will not create undue burdens on public systems, including streets and utilities. 4. The proposed rezoning will not create substantial impacts, visual or otherwise, on neighboring land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the proposed rezoning is hereby recommended for approval. ADOPTED this 6fl' day of December, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Fyle, 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -042 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR (A) VEHICLE SALES AND RENTAL, (B) MINOR VEHICLE REPAIR, (C) OPEN SALES AND DISPLAY, AND (D) ACCESSORY OUTDOOR COMMERCIAL — ENTERTAINMENT / RECREATION LOT 1, BLOCK 2 OTTER CREEK CROSSING WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to improve property to expand an existing motorsports vehicle sales and rental facility, as well as accessory minor vehicle service, expand an outdoor storage area for service and delivery vehicles, and improve and relocate a test track related to the sales and service facility; and WHEREAS, the applicant, in a companion application, is seeking a rezoning of the property from the B -4, Regional Business District to the B -3, Highway Business District to accommodate these uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed use will require the approval of conditional use permits for the both the vehicle sales, service, storage, and testing of the vehicles in the B -3 District as proposed; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Places to Shop" for the area; and WHEREAS, the uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B -3. Highway Business zoning district; and WHEREAS, the uses will not create any unanticipated changes to the demand for public services on or around the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 6th, 2016 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B -3, Highway Business District. 2. The proposed uses are consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by commercial land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The vehicle sales and rental, along with the accessory minor vehicle service use and other related uses meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, pursuant to the conditions attached to the Conditional Use Permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Conditional Use Permits for Vehicle Sales and Rental, as well as for accessory minor vehicle service, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. The applicants shall provide a narrative that describes how vehicles will enter and exit the service area. 2. The landscaping plan shall be modified to move (or replant) the existing evergreen tree buffer along the outdoor storage fence line facing Chelsea Road. 3. The applicant shall provide a narrative detailing the efforts to control dust and drainage that may be generated by use of the "test track ". 4. The approvals granted under these resolutions do not factor future changes or additions, which shall separate review and approvals under the applicable regulations at the time of the change. 5. The applicant shall comply with the terms of the City Engineer's letter dated November 30a', 2016. 6. The applicant has identified a future building beyond the current improvements to the site. The future building addition and the current improvements will create more than 1 acre of new impervious surface, therefore if a future building addition does occur, the infiltration basins will likely need to be enlarged to meet City and the MN Stormwater Manual volume reduction standards at that time. 7. Comments and recommendations of other City staff. ADOPTED this e day of December, 2016 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -043 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO APPROVING A VARIANCE TO THE REQUIRED PROHIBITION OF ACCESSORY OUTDOOR STORAGE \IN THE FRONT YARD IN A B -3 DISTRICT WHEREAS, the applicant operates an existing Recreational Vehicle Sales and Rental Facility at 3360 Chelsea Road, legally described as Lot 1, Block 2, Otter Creek Crossing; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to expand an existing outdoor storage area for service and delivery of recreational vehicles between the building area and the public street; and WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned B -3, Highway Business District, in which recreational vehicle sales and rental facilities are allowed by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the zoning ordinance allows such use, but with a restriction that such uses are not located between the street and the front building line; and WHEREAS, both the existing storage area and the proposed expansion will result in a violation of a portion of the zoning ordinance requiring that such uses are not located in front of the building, requiring a variance; and WHEREAS, the expansion will otherwise be consistent with the improvements currently on the property; and WHEREAS, the proposed land use is a reasonable use of the subject property, consistent with the land uses in the area, including other commercial lodging establishments; and WHEREAS, the proposed expansion is a reasonable location on the property, within other zoning regulations, and would raise other zoning and site development issues is located in other portions of the property, such that there are practical difficulties in complying with the strict language of the zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the matter at its regular meeting on December 6ffi, 2016 and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed expansion is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is reasonable, given the conditions in the area, and on the subject property. 3. There are practical difficulties in using the lot as proposed without approval of the proposed variance. 4. The proposed expansion will otherwise meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance for consideration of the proposed yard location variance. 5. The proposed expansion will not create undue burdens on public systems, including streets and utilities. 6. The proposed use will not create substantial impacts on neighboring land uses that are not within the expectations of the current zoning allowances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, sitting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, Minnesota that the proposed variance is hereby approved. ADOPTED this 6d' day of December, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTIC1ElLILO PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Angela SchuroiTQi ` onlgnunity Development Director K Larson Building, Inc. - Request for Conditional Use Permits, Rezoning, and Variance Lot 1, Block 2 Otter Creek Crossing; PI D#155171001010; 3613 Chelsea Road West Created by: City of Monticello Ax 033900010 �T 1555d0101402f 1'555001 1418 ;6 651 f`. 6-1 1,r 155'600.104200 15500144100 �`_ 1552260UUU1� r r r .ti 2a 1 551 71 000 040 � r,�,Tr ,■! -• , r. � 155194i_ !U.00 213100104201�� l f.� f va /r t. 155226000020 E�+� 4 ^�`. -'ate • i Y- 11501 71 001 01- �~ r 1558 15511000050 ,+� f•,rr `rrr�_, +f% z , y' 1551-2800101.0 . 0 155185r�?��9�I � 155225001'010 213100109".24 , 155 4001010 i 155125000040 155171000060 1551250041 Arm Arm NOS motors P arts ' Moon Motorsports Conditional Use Permit Narrative Moon Motorsports is seeking approval to amend a Conditional Use Permit for Open and Outdoor Sales, Open and Outdoor Storage and Minor Auto Repair and a Conditional Use Permit for Vehicle Sales and Rental. A Conditional Use Permit was previously approved in 2007 for the current building and site. Moon Motorsports sells and services several lines of motorcycles, ATV's, UTV's and Snowmobiles. They employee an average of 30 people. Moon Motorsports hours of operation are as follows: Tuesday, 8:30AM -8PM, Wednesday, 8:30AM- 6PM, Thursday, 8:30AM -8PM, Friday, 8:30AM -6PM, Saturday, 8:30AM -4PM, Sunday and Monday the store is closed. The current proposal adds 8,230 square feet onto the existing building of 24,493 square feet to the northwest. This space is made up of 3,930 square feet additional showroom space and 3,975 square feet additional warehouse storage space. The new showroom space will expand the current product displays in the building and add an additional product line. The new warehouse space will provide much needed interior storage area for product. To the site, a new service drive is being proposed for separate circulation and a loading /delivery zone for large truck deliveries. This design is to solve congestion currently being created both on site and on Chelsea Road during semi truck product deliveries, where trucks often have to remain parked in the street to avoid on site congestion or in the main entry drive, which blocks regular customer traffic. Deliveries made throughout the day will enter the current entry drive, but circulate immediately into the service drive. There they will have adequate stacking space, keeping them from parking on Chelsea Road, and room to pull into a loading zone free of customer traffic. They will then exit the site from the new service drive instead of circulating back through the main entry drive. This will allow several trucks to arrive at once as sometimes happens throughout the week. Often as many as 3 to 4 semi truck deliveries can be made in a single day, sometimes overlapping. In addition 6 pickup /drop -off deliveries a day are often made by smaller truck delivery. Product will be unloaded into the current outdoor storage area and from there either move into the existing warehouse on the south of the building or move on a new paved drive to the warehouse portion of the new addition. To meet the parking requirements a new lot of 35 parking stalls is being proposed to the south, see the site plan for calculations. This lot will serve PO. Box 17B - 3613 Che lsea Road West, Manticella, MN 55362 www.moonmotorsports.com Finagh info@moonmotorsports.com Tuff L-Foo: 1- BBB -400 -4042 Phone: 753- 295 -2920 Fax: 763 - 295 -5254 employees, free up more parking in the main lot for customers and create greater visibility for circulation. A new sidewalk will connect this lot to the current building. Also, proposed is a new screen fence that will replace the current screen fence on the south of the building. This screen fence will enlarge an area that screens and secures vehicles that are in for service and keep these vehicles from overflowing into the customer parking lot. This does not alter the area of the existing fenced exterior storage area of 7,300 square feet where product is currently stored. Also, proposed is a new off road test trail. This will be made up of crushed rock to reduce dust and erosion. This trail is to provide a purposeful area to test drive off road vehicles as a way to reduce on site erosion created by random paths. Finally, the current drive connecting the north and east parking lots is being widened to create greater visibility to the north lot upon entry from the south, and draw customers into that lot. Most customers are currently parking in the east lot and the desire is to bring them closer to the main entrance of the building on the north side. No additional outdoor storage area is being proposed, it will function the same as it currently does. No additional outdoor sales area is being proposed. STANDARDS AND REFERENCES Materials and construction methods specified in the plans reference the Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction. The Contractor shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and review the specification sections applicable to the plans. It is mandatory that the Contractor be knowledgable of the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with the applicable specification sections. Contractor shall refer to the geotechnical report for additional requirements and recommendations. EARTHWORK NOTES PROTECTION 1) The Contractor shall maintain all benchmarks, monuments and other reference points. If any are disturbed or destroyed, they shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. 2). The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any unknown functioning underground utilities are discovered during the course of the project, which may interfere with construction. The Contractor shall wait for instructions before proceeding. 3) The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to functioning underground or overhead utility lines. Damaged utilities shall be repaired immediately and service restored at no additional cost to the Owner. 4) The Contractor shall provide barricades, shoring and other safety measures required by OSHA. 5) The Contractor shall protect all adjacent existing facilities from damage, including, but not limited to settlement due to excavations, erosion, etc. The Contractor shall be responsible for the repair of such damages. PROJECT CONDITIONS 1) The Contractor shall become familiar with the project site, and compare actual conditions in the field with those shown on the project drawings. The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any inconsistencies are found between the existing conditions and the project drawings. 2) No extra compensation will be allowed due to unusual conditions which could have reasonably been determined or anticipated by examination of the project site and project drawings. PLAN GRADES 1) Elevations shown on the project drawings are finished grade elevations, unless noted otherwise. Elevations not specifically indicated shall be determined by interpolation of uniform slope between spot elevations and /or contours, or between such points and existing elevations. Adequate slope shall be constructed to provide positive drainage away from structures. 2) If inconsistencies exist on the plans between contours and spot elevations, the spot elevations shall govern. TOPSOIL 1) Adequate imported and /or stockpiled salvageable topsoil shall be utilized for this project. 2) Topsoil shall be free of clay lumps, roots, brush, large stones, and debris, and shall have a minimum organic content of 5 percent. 3) Remove topsoil to its entire depth from areas, which are to be disturbed by new construction work. Existing lawn areas, which are not in the proposed construction area (s) shall remain in place. The Contractor shall field verify topsoil depths between any soil borings, and remove to greater depths than indicated in the soils report if such conditions are encountered. Salvaged topsoil shall be maintained in stockpiles. 4) Stockpiled topsoil shall only be used for finish grading of new lawn areas. Excess topsoil shall be removed from the site by the Contractor. 5) Protect all existing lawn areas, plantings, and other landscaping to remain in place. Any damaged areas shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. UNFORESEEN OBSTACLES 1) The Engineer shall be contacted immediately if any unforeseen major obstacles are encountered during excavation, such as abandoned wells, abandoned or functioning utilities, subsurface streams or rock, etc., which would add significant expense to the Contractor. 2) The Contractor shall still be responsible for completing all work required for this project where encountered conditions may be reasonably determined from a soils /geotechnical report and review of the project site and contract documents. DEWATERING 1) Surface drainage shall be provided during construction in a manner so as not to create a nuisance to adjacent areas. 2) All excavations shall be free of water during construction within the excavations. Dewatering shall be accomplished by pumping or trenching, and shall be conducted regardless of the cause, source, or nature of the water. 3) Berms, cofferdams, or piling shall be provided as necessary to protect excavations. 4) Excavations shall be sloped to drain, and necessary pumps, hoses and other equipment shall be provided to keep excavation free of water. 5) All temporary equipment used for dewatehng shall be removed from the site when no longer necessary. FILLING AND GRADING 1) Rough grading of all areas within the construction limits, including adjacent transition areas shall be reasonably smooth and compacted. The rough graded subgrade surface generally shall not be more than 6 inches above or below the established subgrade elevations. All ditches, swales, and gutters shall be graded to drain adequately. The subgrade shall be evenly sloped to provide drainage away from building walls in all directions at a minimum slope of 1 %. The Contractor shall provide rounded transitions at top and bottom of banks and other breaks in grade. 2) Fill and backfill materials shall be inorganic soils free of roots, rocks, boulders, and debris. 3) Bedding material or granular backfill larger than 2" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 2 feet of new underground pipes. Material larger than 3" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 1 foot of subgrade elevation. 4) Imported compacted fill material shall have a maximum of 12 percent passing the #200 sieve, by weight. The proposed fill material shall be tested by an independent testing lab for suitability as compacted fill for this project. The Contractor shall pay for the testing services and provide a copy of the test results to the Engineer. 5) The Contractor shall fill and grade as necessary to bring surface to required elevations, and provide all materials necessary, whether obtained on or off the project site. 6) The Contractor shall place compacted material in uniform horizontal lifts not exceeding 8" in depth for clay soils, and 12" in depth for sandy soils, and compact as required to achieve specified density. 7) Compaction shall be obtained with the use of vibratory rollers or rammers. During compaction, fill material shall contain moisture content, as necessary, for the required compaction as indicated by an independent testing laboratory. The moisture shall be uniform throughout each lift. If the material is too dry, water shall be added with approved equipment and methods, which will not wash out fine material. If the material is too wet, it shall be dried by harrowing, disking, blading, or other approved methods recommended by the independent testing laboratory. 8) Areas designated for pavement in excavated (cut) areas shall be scarified to a depth of 1 foot. The Contractor shall bring the subgrade material to optimum moisture content as indicated by the independent testing laboratory, and compact the subgrade to the specified density listed below for soils underneath pavements. 9) The Contractor shall not place fill material when either the fill material, or the material on which it is to be placed, is frozen. Any soft or yielding areas appearing in the fill resulting from frost, rain, or any other reason whatsoever shall be scarified, removed, recompacted and /or otherwise rectified to the satisfaction of the Engineer before any new fill is placed. COMPACTION TESTS 1) Utility Trench Backfill: The Contractor's independent soils technician and approved testing laboratory shall perform in -place density and moisture tests at random depths in trench backfill at 100 foot intervals, or fraction thereof. Compaction of trenches shall be a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density (as determined by the independent testing laboratory) in lawn areas, and at depths greater than 3 feet below areas designated for pavement. Compaction of trenches at depths within 3 feet of paved surfaces shall be a minimum of 100% of the maximum dry density. 2) Compacted Fill Under Pavements: Compaction tests shall not be required beneath new pavements. Adequate compaction of materials under pavements shall be determined by test rolling the subgrade, and checking for excessive rutting. Test rolling shall be performed as per MNDOT Spec. 2111. 3) Areas exhibiting a failed compaction test shall be re- compacted and re -m tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to acceptance of the project. 4) Copies of all compaction testing and test roll observation reports shall be provided to the Engineer. 5) Optimum moisture - density relationship will be determined by testing laboratory in accordance with ASTM D698 and maximum density determination made by Method D of ASTM D698 unless otherwise noted in these specifications. SUBGRADE PREPARATION 1) Finished subgrade elevations shall be as follows: a) Bituminous pavement: 11" below finish grade. b) Gravel surfacing: 4" below finish grade. c) Lawn areas: 4" below finish grade. d) Planting areas: See Landscaping Plans /Details 2) The tolerance for areas to be paved shall not exceed 0.15 feet above or below plan subgrade. 3) The Contractor shall protect newly graded areas from erosion. Settlement or washing that occurs prior to acceptance of the Work shall be repaired and grades re- established. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS WASTE MATERIALS 1) The Contractor shall remove excess excavated material, debris, and waste materials, from the Owner's property and legally dispose of it in accordance with all governing codes. SPREADING TOPSOIL AND FINISH GRADING 1) Scarify subgrade to depth of 3" prior to placing topsoil. Spread topsoil evenly over complete subgrade as follows: a) Lawn Areas on Private Property: Spread 4" lightly compacted layer of topsoil. b) Lawn Areas in Public Right -of -way: Per City requirements c) Planting Areas: See Landscape Plan /Details 2) Finish grade accurately within 0.15 feet of finish grades shown on the project drawings, less the thickness of any sod where it is to be installed. Slope all grades away from buildings to provide positive drainage. 3) Prepare topsoil suitable to receive seed and /or sod. Grading of areas designated for topsoil shall be reasonably smooth and even, and in accordance with MNDOT Spec. 2105.3G and 2574.3A4. All debris and stones exceeding 3" in diameter shall be removed from the soil surface of these areas prior to seeding. Areas compacted by vehicles or storage of materials shall be plowed, disked and harrowed to match texture of other finish graded areas. 4) Grass seed shall be in accordance with MnDOT Spec. 3876, seed mix No. 25 -131, applied at the rate of 220 pounds per acre or as indicated on the landscape plans. Mulch shall be applied and discanchored to all seeded areas and shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Spec. 3882, Type 3 or as otherwise indicated by the Engineer. UTILITY NOTES STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1) The following standard specifications shall apply to this project: a) Minnesota Plumbing Code - MN Rules Chapter 4714 (MN Dept. of Labor and Industry- MNDLI) b) Uniform Plumbing Code, latest edition (UPC) c) "What you need to know about utility service connections in the 2015 Minnesota Plumbing Code" http:// www .dli.mn.gov /CCLD /PDF /pe_usc.pdf d) City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Standard Specifications e) American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) f) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) g) American Water Works Association (AWWA) h) Minnesota Department of Transportation "Standard Specifications for Construction" (MN /DOT) 2) The Contractor shall comply with all local ordinances and codes 3) Certifications of all utility materials, as well as shop drawings, shall be submitted to the Engineer for review HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) HDPE pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM F2306, and Section 2621.2A8 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Minimum wall thickness shall be 0.035 inches for 12 and 15 inch diameter pipe, and shall be 0.05 inches for 18 and 24 inch diameter pipe. 4) HDPE storm sewer crossing above and within 10 -ft of existing or proposed water main or services shall meet the following standards per the MN plumbing code: 4"- 10" Diameter: AASHTO M252 12" - 60" Diameter: ASTM F2306 Fittings: ASTM D3212 REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWER PIPE (RCP) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) RCP pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Section 4715.0420 of the MN Plumbing Code, and Section 2621.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 4715.0780 of the MN Plumbing Code, and Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) The ASTM strength class of pipe shall be Class III unless otherwise shown on the Plans. 4) The pipe shall be drawn together by some approved method of jacking or winching. This pressure must be maintained until sufficient backfill is placed to keep the joint from opening. END SECTIONS - STORM 1) End sections shall be provided at all pipe inlets and outlets. 2) The end sections shall consist of material matching the material of the pipe, which it is being connected to. Materials and joints shall be as per the specifications described above for the applicable pipe material. 3) The last 3 joints shall be tied, and the end section shall the be provided with an approved trash guard. MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS - SANITARY AND STORM 1) Unless otherwise noted, manhole and catch basin structures shall consist of precast concrete, and meet the requirements of Sections 2621.2C and 2621.31D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Catch basins shall be provided with the following castings: a) Along curbline: Neenah R -3246 as per City of Monticello standards b) Isolated (in paved area): Neenah R -2553 w/ type "C" grate c) Isolated (in vegetated area): Neenah R -2560 w/ type "C" grate 3) Manholes shall be provided with the following castings: a) Sanitary: Neenah R- 1 642 -A per City of Monticello standards b) Storm: Neenah R-1 642-A per City of Monticello standards INSTALLATION 1) Unless otherwise noted, installation of all water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtenances shall be as per the CEAM Standard Specifications. TESTING REQUIREMENTS 1) Water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtances shall be inspected and tested as per Sections 4715.2800- 4715.2890 of the MN Plumbing Code, and Sections 2611.3E-2611.3H and 2621,3F- 2621.3H of the CEAM Standard Specifications. 2) In the event of discrepancies between the testing requirements of the MN Plumbing Code and the CEAM Standard Specifications, the most stringent will govern. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTES STANDARDS 1) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, most recent edition. GRANULAR BASE COURSE 1) Compacted thickness of finished base and surface courses: Bituminous pavement = 8" Gravel test track = 4" 2) Process material for aggregate base shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3138, Class 5. Process material for aggregate surface course shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3138, Class 2 (100% crushed). 3) The subgrade shall be tested and observed to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to placement of aggregate base material. Install base material as required to accommodate new plan grades. 4) Wet base material to approximate optimum moisture content either prior to delivery to job site or as soon as practical after being placed on subgrade. 5) Place in layers not exceeding 4" thickness (loose). 6) Compact with pneumatic or vibrating steel drum rollers. 7) After base course has been graded and compacted, thoroughly wet and slush roll with roller until all aggregates are thoroughly embedded. 8) Allow base course to cure for a minimum of 72 hours prior to bituminous course application. BITUMINOUS BASE AND SURFACE COURSE 1) Mix Designation Numbers for the bituminous mixtures on this project are per MNDOT Spec. 2360 2) Pavement smoothness requirements will be waived for this project. 3) Density for the bituminous mixture on this project will be the ordinary compaction method ( MNDOT 2360.6C). 4) Bituminous Base course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPNWB330B and shall be 1# inches thick after compaction. Bituminous Surface course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPWEB340B and shall be 1# inches thick after compaction. 5) Place no asphaltic mixture when the atmospheric temperature is below 45 degrees and falling, nor should pavement be placed under wet conditions. 6) Mixing a) Paving mixture: Uniform mixture of course aggregate, fine aggregate, mineral filler and asphaltic material. b) Grading and mixing: Conform to applicable sections of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, Section 2360. CONSTRUCTION METHODS 1) Properly clean base course and deliver hot mix asphaltic concrete in clean tight vehicles with covers if necessary. 2) Lay to a smooth surface without segregation of material and attain compaction as early as possible. Commence rolling while the material is hot, (minimum spread temperature 250 degrees F.) as soon as it will support the roller without undue displacement or hairline cracking and continue until a minimum of 96% of maximum has been attained, no further compression can be attained and all roller marks are eliminated. 3) The completed surface: Smooth, free of pockets that will retain water and shall not vary more than 1/16" per foot nor more than 1/4" under a 16' straight edge. Entire surface must drain. No flat areas are permitted. 4) Perform all Work in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. PAINTED LINES 1) Special marking paint compound especially for striping bituminous paving in one coat. 2) Manufacturers: Pratt & Lambert, Inc.; Sherwin Williams Co. or DuPont Co. 3) Colors: Use white paint for concrete and asphalt. 4) All surfaces to be painted must be thoroughly clean and dry. 5) Lay out painted lines with chalk on pavement in accordance with Project Drawings. 6) Accurately apply paint to the chalk marks, using striping machines, 4" wide stripes. 7) Apply paint in strict accordance with the manufacturer's directions. 8) Protect all paint from damage by traffic until dry. 9) Apply handicap logo at handicap stall. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL 1) Aggregate Base Testing: a) The granular base course shall be test rolled and observed by the Contractor's independent soils technician as per MNDOT 2211.3C2 (Quality Compaction Method). Once the base course has been tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer, pavement may be placed. b) One mechanical analysis (ASTM D -422) per 500 cubic yards of base or fraction thereof. 2) Bituminous Testing: a) Test temperature of first truck. b) Ordinary compaction ( MNDOT 2360.6C) CONCRETE PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS 1) ACI 318, ACI 315, CRSI, ACI 301, latest adoptions. 2) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Construction, most recent edition GRANULAR BASE COURSE MATERIAL 1) Compacted thickness of finished base: 6" - Concrete Pavement /Aprons 4" - Concrete Sidewalk 2) Base material shall consist of MNDOT 3149.262 Select Granular Borrow. AGGREGATES 1) Coarse: MnDOT Spec. 3137. 2) Fine: MnDOT Spec. 3126. WATER 1) Clean, fresh and potable, MnDOT Spec. 3906. AIR ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES 1) ASTM, C260. 2) Provide entrainment of 4 - 7 percent by volume. PORTLAND CEMENT 1) ASTM C150, Type I plus an approved air entraining agent, or Type IA air - entraining Portland cement. OTHER ADMIXTURES 1) MnDOT Spec. 3113. 2) Calcium Chloride or materials containing chlorides or nitrates shall not be allowed. PROPORTIONING AND DESIGN OF MIXES 1) MnDOT Spec. 2461.3 2) Concrete Classifications a) Curb and gutter, slip- formed concrete: 3A22 b) Sidewalk, aprons, incidental concrete, manual curb & gutter: 3A32 c) Concrete pavements or aprons: 3Y43 d) Repair concrete, fast strength concrete: 3Y43 3) Concrete Specifications: a) 3A22: 1 -2" slump, 3900 psi, 4 -7% air b) 3A32: 2 -3" slump, 3900 psi, 4 -7% air c) 3Y43: 34' slump, 4300 psi, 4 -7% air d) Temperatures of all concrete during placement shall be 50 -deg F to 90 -deg F CONCRETE PLACEMENT 1) Place concrete as soon as possible after mixing. Place before initial set has occurred, and in no event after it has contained its water content for more than one hour. 2) Avoid overworking concrete or allowing concrete to fall unrestricted for excessive vertical distances, and other situations which can cause segregation of the aggregates. 3) Concrete pavements shall be placed in accordance with applicable portions of MnDOT 2301. 4) Sidewalks shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2521. 5) Curb and gutter shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2531. PROTECTION 1) Provide adequate protection against rain, sleet and snow before and during placement and finishing of concrete. 2) Protect concrete from premature drying. Provide temporary covering as required. Keep concrete continuously moist for 7 days. 3) Treat concrete with membrane curing compound in accordance with MnDOT 2531.3G. COLD WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is below 40 degrees F., or when the concrete is likely to be subjected to freezing temperatures within 24 hours after it has been deposited unless adequate temporary heating is provided. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from freezing for the following 5 days. 3) No frozen materials may be used in the concrete. Chemicals may not be used to prevent freezing unless approved by the Engineer. 4) Perform all cold weather concreting in accord with ACI 306. HOT WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is above 100 degrees F. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from temperatures over 90 degrees for the following 5 days. 3) Thoroughly wet dry porous surfaces before concreting. 4) Water reducing admixtures with retarding properties are required for all concrete placed when the temperature exceeds 80 degrees F. 5) Perform all hot weather concreting in accord with ACI 305. FINISHING 1) Provide a broomed finish on exterior sidewalks and ramps unless noted otherwise. QUALITY CONTROL 1) The Contractor shall hire an independent testing firm to provide the following tests: a) The independent testing technician shall perform random field testing of the fresh concrete including slump, air content, and temperature. (ASTM C143, C173, C231 and C138). One series of the aforementioned tests shall be performed on the first load of concrete. b) The independent testing technician shall cast a set of four compression test cylinders for the first load of concrete as well as 1 set for every 100 cubic yards, or fraction thereof, of concrete thereafter. Compression tests shall be performed on one test cylinder at 7 days and two test cylinders at 28 days. The fourth test cylinder shall be retained in the event of failing compression tests on the 28 -day test cylinders. GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS (D T O N r O T T I W J G IM W U J > U 3 7 rn U N Q O U O s= Q 0 E 0 a) Q) (�-0 U } N _ DL N V) O N N Q E 0 N O - a a N N —0-0 -0 N D O U O O L :- 3 ;H N O O N C C a� 0- N N w w CL CD Z �Z W (D W U) Zw CD � Z Ww J D C45 2 U co ls�: Z O i= CL U Ln w a` CV d' O Z m C N U J .. 0 CV 0 Lr� F1 00 O 0 T U 07 co N co co 2! — co CO O( M 80 N LL U E O U O1 .N N 0 N 0) Q N co N (0 > L _ = O 4-1 CO :3 N = O U) N 00 L/) w Z O o V) U O Z Cam, �, v � r O In Cn O I 1 �i Z O Q C) Q V Z In PROJECT NUMBER: 16057 Cl of 7 Q O W Z O J J W U_ Z 0 2" 4" MIN. USE NEENAH R- 1642 -A FOR LOW PROFILE APPLICATIONS USE NEENAH R1755 -G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS LETTERING TO READ: SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER OR WATER MAIN WHICH EVER IS APPLICABLE. "I«MA,H R -1642 WITH B SOLID LID VE BEARING OR 25 3/4 " BEARIN3 SURFACE TO BE MACHINED LJ LILT �1�� COVER CONCEALED PICKHOLES (2) �. EAT OPPOSITE Q1 EXCEPT FOR LE17ERI 71 L 24" 28 1/2 ^ 36" Standard Plate Library City of Monticello A L CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R- 3067 -V 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR 34" PLAN FRAME Title: Standard Frame and Cover Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 10 0 2 A 35 1/4 43" ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) 6F__\7�6.. 24" FINISH GRADE 31" 3'- 6" 5" !71 4" CONCRETE COLLAR NOTES: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R- 3508 -A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Catch Basin Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 4002 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello A Title: Typical Trench Compaction and Class B Bedding Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 10 0 7 PLAN I_1 35 -1/4" 143" CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R- 3067 -V ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA COLLAR 6" TYPE II WITH 24 "x 36" OPENING *15" . 24" 9" w X *48 "(NP) *DIMENSION VARIES BASED ON STRUCTURE DIAMETER CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION RCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE - NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 433B OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT -OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn /DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R- 3508 -A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Catch Basin Manhole Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 03 -15 4003 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP. TOP TO BE 1/2 BELOW FINISHED GRADE VARIES 10' TO 20 Title: Trash Guard for End Section Date: 03 -05 Revised: 03-15 TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS FINISHED GRADE 6" PVC RISER FOR NON- RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL Plate No. 4007 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BEND CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET / OR CEMENTED PLUG PVC VV HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 46 BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Title: - - Standard Plate Librar y for Sanitary Clean -Out the City of Monticello Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: o3-07 3005 STANDARD CITY DETAILS CO U O 01 T1_ O 0 d N 0 0 E 0 a) (D 0 z O -0 U } INT m r Q N 'n i U N U I O N Q \ \\ U Q I U Ln Z J U N i3 w 10 O o_ N N CD G U_ N L O U M Ln O U a O N N C N � m � U PROJECT NUMBER: J �n V (0 c O 5 7 L 0 7 U U j 0 co Z co� w CD C ffo w _ co CO N � Z W li _c ' ^ Q v U O Z Ww .N N �— W = Q N U C) �� a) >_ L Fr z3: �o_� \ �► :3 N \\ O N W CO c>s r(n(n z O F- 0_ tY U V) LU 0 (/) w Z ~ 0 0 w O Z N � r 0 LU z 0 J J LU z d z 0 Q v) C) Q \ \\ 0 I Z O 0 0 1 5 L z m 0 00 � N PROJECT NUMBER: 0 16057 a� 0 0 co C2 of 7 0 LU z 0 J J LU z d 46 LF 12" HDPE- @ 1.09% 12" FLARED INFILTRATION BASIN #2 END SECTION/ IMP= 950.90 BOTTOM OF BASIN = 950.00 BASIN OUTLET = 951.50 ' TQP OF BASIN (EOF) = 954.00 ' TO BEM = 954. P °eda =, / q (EOF) "7 /A# / -Chan Link Fence //IV EXPOSED FOUNDATION WALL / (SEE STRUCTURAL) / / /'�i /�aE,ep / / N 95i.e `` `Etlge of Planter DT31NCLUSTER INV 951.] / / / / 963 J CT BIN 61N .•_12" HDPE ` �.� / ; concrere Cur` 10 CONNECT TO ROOF DRAIN INV @ BLDG = 957.50 �C 24 LF 8" PVC / @ 20.83% / CLEANOUT ' RIM = 95$.60 / INV = 9��� i / �'f06 LF 8" PVC �♦ / � //' / T.00 %a�o6 ,A �C CLEANOUT RIM = 957.45 / ' / Ed ep+cPncrete,' I INV = 951/60 100 LF 8" PVC OUTLOT�N @D / gob / f der ntl Gas/ OO Per cr On EX '686 a / N %CT 6IN / �$� 3B re, I 6 , I �"` SU a - sa g ea f °''gin \ 1 ID / °'R4s 01 I �N o,R4ge AUILDIyJ� / EdgeotPlante -- Sg ` / \ i I VV / / / �\ ADRffION FFE= 963.5-/' f \ -- -Edge of COncreta t E = 963.5,/ j ding Entrance Ovarha }+•'' unaer�a Elear�n - INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE DRIVEN ACROSS INFILTRATION BASIN AREAS. BASIN AREAS SHALL BE EXCAVATED WITH A BACKHOE STATIONED OUTSIDE OF THE AREA. 2. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE ADJACENT DRIVEWAYS AND BUILDINGS, THE INFILTRATION BASIN AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM TRAFFIC AND SEDIMENT WITH SILT FENCE. 3. THE BOTTOM OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 24 INCHES WITH THE USE OF APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT (TILLER, RIPPER, ETC.). AFTER SCARIFICATION, THE BASIN SHALL BE LINED WITH A MINIMUM OF 5- INCHES OF TOPSOIL, WHICH SHALL BE PLACED AS LOOSELY AS POSSIBLE. 4. ONCE THE INFILTRATION BASINS ARE COMPLETED AND THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE AND PAY FOR TESTING THE INFILTRATION RATES OF THE BOTTOMS OF THE BASINS. THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY AND THE ENGINEER. 5. FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL NOT BE COMPLETED UNTIL C/ THE UPSTREAM DRAINAGE AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. /rcti� I tleetled to the Stale of Minnesota Y o's. 242619. 266902, and 266001 / / \ G4hn,bbe / RIM= 960.11 67 \ INV = 956 fi 'Ilk - \ er Clean OUt - -•1 /�`o � re'S4e C \� Is--12 "HOPE SIOrm Sewer ` O,.a' O '\ •f --Moon Motors Sign 6 \ E / / `\\ cQ I \ ` 6p DT 3IN CLUSTER/ // '� % A• / and unt Eaaement IaF -�;' 4 6 6 Q/ / 9e Utility per p 6!1 J Ed9e of Planter FIa9POl.- - pb \ p {� L aP Q FIT 6IN ( ` -Tel hone Pedestal 1y pplans I _. .Storm Sewer Ma(cle 1 •- -Untla.P e El - -Slortn so-, Clean put a „PyC Slofm Sewer per ct Edge f/COncrete - -i f RIM =96061 b per G`pM1er� -_ 9 INV SW. 95651 ! �Gu tle/lVir N_I INV NW. 9564 L\ / / Ercisting BUiltling / / // 1 INV BE %63` #3fi13 Chelsea Reatl W. / .-- Underground El�ctrc / II / GT 6IN 6IN i per Gopher One\ Concrete Cu"_ CT 61N EX Bituminous Surface --.� c Qor�'e 1 ,O , .Concrete Curb 186,2) . g 1 EX I - PairA ' / ° ._ `• o /' .- `rStriPing (tYpicall / / ♦ / CT 6IN ( / / ° ncrete GIN / Q9a _T BIN/ d l FFE = 963.4-, ��' / �' / yap / Edge of Concrete,, 6O\ : -- .FFE =9G3 i, ..4 Cone7ate Column( typical) o -� EX 9 �o e,�/ cTbl Yc I 6encM1ma - / I crslN 41N2 e of Concrete 8 IV/ ! ( C T 41 \ `Need Fend, mr a tseeNOtaz7 11 / RIM)= 954.50 \\ m�° ,'' , `'Nr ``1I RT61N I pT81N °5.00 / I INV 950.50 �' _ d / / I h / I SL = 947.50 f `41N E - e \. � 11 / o J 2 \ 1 6 °j'wo° \� Ruiltlin9 - -� \ a�Q // / RIM = 958.58 � \, ♦ Q \ / CT 41 s \ Overnang J / INV NW. = 954.8 qv ^> > 9S ` " CBI \ Etlge of 5 �e 0 INV SW =9543 �'• / / / / / •g0 , 41N (9 RIM= 961.15 �. ee ! 4 ` INV = 957.15 Fj0 962 p 4j ' STM H L 1) 62 - -Concre cum stn m sewer ran o ` _ _ / / 3e a` RIM 1956.00 O i perchvPlana ryo / / / INV = 1.�9 f g 5 951.43 "b' 0 I f Z.01111-4 ;Q / CT Indicate. - / ♦/ / / V / rm 0.5 ° --ST TUR #1 \\ ` 41N T41N EX m �` / /'41 DT 41NI _ \ ' (SEE 3/C ) \ -.^� 1 6 "Watennaln per city plant -:' O TrET STRUCNk#,2' (�M- ManM1ela 60 rC 6p T (SEEj/ \) (/ ,.\ \ ` \ NW\G S RI = 595 �� 060 O / �// p �/ h 9S 1 V = 5 5 `1 \° / 13 u1 nnousSeNacaa 24" PE �y d' U - 9 2.35 �/ I \@ 0.55 X� DT , 5 J'IL 2 IINV XLSG \ +\ \ 0 9 LF CONNECTOO E TIN 3' e / ��♦ HDPE S7'WB \� \ �\ `\ \ \ _� 12" HDPE 41 - Concrete Curie-1 cnn<re,e cl„s - --` IN 48 68 5 � 5 0 32role ` \ \\ `\ O �� / ^HDPE -w Dr inage and Utility EasemiplaF/ st sewerManno 4 5 O � \ \ RI5361 V J` 16 / \ 28 LF Catch Basin RIM = 953.34 -� � ` 0- / \ \ ••�� DT41N\ 2 HDPE ` EX ,: / ♦ / O \ 0 4% % 0 f HAALA PS60 -72S POND SKIMMER �// \ 8•0�00 \ \FS� � /� G"a\m / D7 aIN �- P OF BERM \ °a \m e / / / �Q \ / / CASTING W/ WEDGE ANCHORS, OR f APPROVED EQUIVALENT (INSTALL PER = 955100 (TYP) 12' FLARED-/♦ // (EOF) �1 a "ary P ` D�41N ` \\ E'ND SE�LO J ,' j / MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS AND ,�__ -- �\ ?N\ X54.5 pedrgrooeetne /yE y/' //� SPECIFICATIONS i \ / //0 / / PRECAST CONCRETE COVERS, BARREL \ I 1 \ \ \ \ ._.relepnolm, Pedestal / m' c e / .°� , DT41N ELEV = 959.00 1 \ \ uno vamt ' / SECTIONS, AND BASES SHALL MEET THE 1 �\ \'� htg;, � REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT 1 \ INGSE. =952.0 INV =9d]5y/r ELEV = 958.70 INFILTRATION BASIN � 1 \ e INV-w. = �f / ' �6 © I ♦/ 4 0„ 1 PLATES 4011 AND 4020 BOTTOM OF BASIN = 954.50 II \\ \ \ Baain / 96zf FIT 41N �- \ /- RIM = 959.05 6" -WIDE WEIR d 1 `\ /' / 11N =9544 , 1 48" PRECAST CONCRETE BARREL(S) BASIN OUTLET = 956.50 ` L k- -- -p Base I WITH RUBBER GASKET(S) ASTM C443 -79 DT 161N J i_undo,grouna telephone J Dncree © ff TOP OF BASIN (EOF) = 959.00 1 \ pe,G °Phan°ne ; 10 ' ♦ Pedestal � � � � � � _ ,one M ° °nM °`nry6ign WATERSTOP GASKET, OR APPROVED ELEV = 957.80 I EQUIVALENT W/ NON - SHRINK PATCHING �\ �O \\ - - �'-� •�` \ �� ,� Fiber Optic c Hand H °I�. / / I °I COMPOUND, AT PIPE /STRUCTURE , CONNECTION O � a \\ \ •'�/ \\ �s�e> s� \ fib\ // OUTLOT G 6° \ M Otlhde \` / I FLOW 46 LF RI © DT 41-N , \ 4" DIA. ORIFICE d - -_ 12" HDPE @ 11.02% \ `` '•-- Lndnd Fiber Optic G,phe \/ \ per Gppner one BASIN SIDE 4" SAND/ COMPOST BOTTOM OF BASIN NATIVE SAND SOILS NOTES: 1. BASIN BOTTOM 2. SAND /COMPOST MIX SHALL BE SEEDED W/ SHALL CONSIST OF 70% NATIVE SEED MIX AND/ CLEAN SAND & 30% OR PLANTINGS COMPOST INFILTRATION BASIN #1 NTS BASIN SIDE 4" SAND/ COMPOST - - -- Overhead Utlfity Line (typical) BOTTOM OF BASIN 8 NATIVE SAND SOILS NOTES: 1. BASIN BOTTOM 2. SAND /COMPOST MIX SHALL BE SEEDED W/ SHALL CONSIST OF 70% NATIVE SEED MIX AND/ CLEAN SAND & 30% OR PLANTINGS COMPOST NFILTRATION BASIN #2 NTS ELEV = 956.50 ELEV = 956.50 14 d ELEV = 955.50 1 d ° O ° o d 1, 5' -4" 8" PRECAST CONCRETE BASE OVERFLOW GRATE 6" WEIR BASIN #1 OUTLET STRUCTURE TOP OF WEIR (AT GRATE) = 958.70 6" -WIDE WEIR OPENING BOTTOM OF WEIR = 957.80 . vNCRETE BARREL SECTION NTS GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS, AND RIM AND INVERT ELEVATIONS, OF EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURES. LOCATION AND SIZE OF EXISTING SANITARY, WATER, AND STORM SEWER STUBS, AND EXISTING GRADES SHALL ALSO BE VERIFIED. 2. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY PROVIDED BY WEBB SURVEYING, MAPLE LAKE, MN (763) 898 -9999. 3. BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED IN THE EASTERLY PARKING LOT OF BUILDING #3613 CHELSEA ROAD W. - ELEV= 963.61 FEET (NGVD 1988 DATUM) 4. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY INCONSISTENCIES ARE DISCOVERED BETWEEN ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WHICH ARE SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO ALTER THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS. 5. IF REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY STORM SEWER UTILITIES. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER ONE CALL AT (800) 252-1166 FOR A UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFY LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 7. SEE SHEET C2 FOR STANDARD DETAILS. 8. HDPE STORM SEWER CROSSING ABOVE AND WITHIN 10 -FT OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER MAIN OR SERVICES SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS PER THE MN PLUMBING CODE: 4"- 10" DIAMETER: AASHTO M252 12" - 60" DIAMETER: ASTM F2306 FITTINGS: ASTM D3212 SEE SHEET C6 FOR LOCATIONS OF NEW WATER MAIN AND SERVICES. 9. ALL LENGTHS OF STORM SEWER OR CULVERT PIPE SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN INCLUDE THE LENGTHS OF ANY ASSOCIATED FLARED END SECTIONS. 10. TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL STORM SEWER END SECTIONS. 11. FINISHED ELEVATIONS OF LAWN /GREEN AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR OR TOP -OF -BLOCK ELEVATION. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL BE BASED ON EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR 13. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE FLOW LINE AND /OR FINISHED GRADES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ARE 6" ABOVE THE FLOW LINE SPOT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 14. "EX" DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS 15. ALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF PAVING OR GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS CATCH BASINS AND /OR OUTLETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ELEVATIONS, WHICH WILL PROMOTE POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. NOTE: CADD FILES FOR ESTIMATING EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTORS FOR PREPARING BIDS. IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE CADD FILES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO SIGN A HOLD - HARMLESS AGREEMENT PROVIDED BY SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, AND AGREE TO PAY A $50 PROCESSING FEE. THE CADD FILES WILL BE RELEASED UPON RECEIPT OF THE CHECK HAALA PS60 -72S POND SKIMMER CASTING W/ WEDGE ANCHORS, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT (INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS ELEV = 959.00 PRECAST CONCRETE COVERS, BARREL SECTIONS, AND BASES SHALL MEET THE ° REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT ELEV = 958.70 PLATES 4011 AND 4020 1° 4' -0" 1 14 48" PRECAST CONCRETE BARREL(S) ° 1 WITH RUBBER GASKET(S) ASTM C443 -79 1 1 o WATERSTOP GASKET, OR APPROVED 1 EQUIVALENT W/ NON - SHRINK PATCHING 1 COMPOUND, AT PIPE /STRUCTURE 14 of CONNECTION 6" 1 FLOW 14 LF 4" DIA. ORIFICE ° 1 _` 12" HDPE o @ 0.50% ELEV = 951.50 ELEV = 951.50 a d ELEV = 950.50 I° d d o ° o d d 5-4" , 8" PRECAST CONCRETE BASE BASIN #2 OUTLET STRUCTURE NTS GRADING PLAN 0 40 80 160 CO U O 01 T1_ O 0 d N E 0 N N 0 0 Z O -0 v} m T r Q � � N V) i U N U I __j U � U Q J _� �- Lu CL 10 1E C Q 0 -0 O G M N V) U U U O U U) N c O Q Q U) C •I U � - >✓ rn W < m U J �n V (0 c O > 7 L (.0 7 U U j J Z C0 CY) co co Ua W `J � 11 C CO w - co CO N Z W LL J � LL ' ^ Q v U O Z W W U) .N N �-/� W W Q N U ' A CO U U N N (0 >- L If Z 3: O L \ 3 N \\ O N � � 0 00 Z O V) w 0 Z O o w O Z N r z O n v) n Q Q O ,^ o V v� C) W z z O <Z In G J O 5 � z J U_ p -o 0 z O O � N � PROJECT NUMBER: 16057 N SCALE: 0 1 " =40' 0 co C3 OF 7 PROJECT INFORMATION Protect Description This project will consist of the construction of an addition to an existing commercial building with a footprint of approximately P l g g p pp Y 8,200 SF, as well as parking lot and driveway areas. Storm water management for the project will consist of two infiltration basins for rate control purposes. Impervious Surface Tabulation (within proposed construction area) Existing Impervious Area 0.04 acres Proposed Impervious Area 0.70 acres Net Impervious Area Increase 0.66 acres Estimated Disturbed Area 1 1.9 acres Permanent Site Drainaae Site drainage will be routed to one of two infiltration basins located on either side of the proposed driveway entrance for the purposes of meeting City rate control requirements. The basins will outlet into the public storm sewer system located in the adjacent Chelsea Road. Since new and redeveloped impervious surface areas total less than 1 acre, storm water management related to water quality is not included in the project. Receiving Surface Waters The following surface waters could receive storm water runoff from this project, and are within 1 mile of the project site: Surface Water Type of Surface Water Impaired Water? Special Water? USEPA Approved TMDL for Impaired Water? Comments Mississippi River River Yes Yes N/A 1 5.5 Instructor Dates of Training Course Total Training Hours SEDIMENT AND OTHER POLLUTANTS This SWPPP has been designed mainly to provide erosion and sediment control of naturally occurring soils at this site (ie: sands, looms, and clays). Although this SWPPP does address pollution prevention of other man-made materials, it is assumed that these materials will consist of debris from existing tructures and pavements to be demolished or debris and chemicals ie: fuels new g p ( • paints, etc.) resulting from new construction. There are no known solid wastes or hazardous materials buried below grade at this site. If such wastes or hazard materials are discovered during construction, the SWPPP Coordinator (described below) will be responsible for notifying the Engineer. This SWPPP will then be revised to address he presence and disposal of these additional pollutants EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL RESPONSIBILITIES SWPPP Design Engineer and Qualifications Design Engineer Brian J. Schultz, PE Training Course Design of SWPPP Recert. Training Entity University of Minnesota Instructor John Chapman Dates of Training Course = =May 2014 Total Training Hours 1 5.5 SWPPP Coordinator and Qualifications * "Design of SWPPP" is a recertification course offered by the University of Minnesota. The Engineer's certification for "Design of SWPPP" is current, and will expire May 31, 2017. Certification documentation is on file at the Engineer's office and a copy can be provided upon request. The Contractor shall provide an individual who shall serve as the SWPPP Coordinator for this project. The SWPPP coordinator shall oversee the implementation of this SWPPP, as well as the necessary inspections (described below) of erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs. The SWPPP Coordinator shall also oversee the installation, maintenance, and repair of the BMP's to be completed in accordance with this SWPPP. The SWPPP Coordinator shall be responsible for the items listed above during the period from the start of the project to the establishment of final stabilization. During this period, the SWPPP Coordinator, or their assigned, qualified (see below) representative shall be available for an on -site inspection within 72 hours upon request by the MPCA. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to complete the table below, which will identify the SWPPP Coordinator and that person's qualifications. This person shall acknowledge that he /she has been assigned to serve as SWPPP Coordinator and will be overseeing the items listed in this section, by providing their signature in the space below. Please note that this SWPPP will not be considered complete if the table below is not filled in. * Typically, the identity of the SWPPP Coordinator is unknown until the project is awarded. The SWPPP Coordinator may be identified at the project's Preconstruction Conference. SWPPP Coordinator Company Name Office Phone # Cell Phone # Training Course Training Entity Instructor Dates of Training Course Total Training Hours I, , hereby (Printed Name) acknowledge that I will be serving as SWPPP Coordinator for this project and will be responsible for overseeing the items identified in this section. (Signature) (Date) The SWPPP Coordinator may assign other personnel to supervise or perform the duties listed above. However, in completing the duties listed above, at least one person shall be trained in erosion prevention and sediment control as related to that particular part of the SWPPP. If the SWPPP Coordinator chooses to delegate some of the duties and responsibilities listed above to other personnel, a list of the personnel, as well as their qualifications, shall be kept with and shall become part of this SWPPP. The qualifications shall be documented in a manner similar to the table shown above. A copy of this list shall be provided to the Engineer. Once the project has been completed and accepted by the Owner, and Final Stabilization has been established and "Notice of Termination" submittedto the MPCA, the Owner assumes responsibility for the long term maintenance of the storm water management system. The SWPPP Coordinator shall be responsible for ensuring that the Contractor properly disposes of the temporary erosion and sediments control measures within 30 days after site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary measures are no longer needed. Record Retention The SWPPP and associated records shall be stored and maintained by an employee or representative of the Owner for 3 years after the submission of the Notice of Termination (NOT) Responsibility for overseeing the records will be transferred to another employee or representative should the current personnel become uninvolved with the project or Owner. These records shall include the following: 1). The final SWPPP 2). Any other stormwater related permits required for the project 3). Records of all inspection and maintenance conducted during construction 4). All permanent operation and maintenance agreements that have been implemented, including all right -of -way, contracts, covenants and other binding requirements regarding perpetual maintenance 5). All required calculations for design of the temporary and permanent Stormwater Management Systems. BMP INSPECTIONS Inspection Frequency The SWPPP Coordinator shall inspect, or designate someone else who is qualified to inspect (see above), the construction site erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs per the following time frames: 1). Once every 7 days 2). Within 24 hours of a rain event (1 /2" or greater over 24 hours) Inspections shall be conducted per the time frames listed above with the following exceptions: 1). Where parts of the construction site have permanent cover, but work remains on other parts of the site, inspections of areas with permanent cover may be reduced to once per month 2). Where construction sites have permanent cover on all exposed soil areas and no construction activity is occurring anywhere on the site, the site must be inspected for a period of 12 months (inspections may be suspended during frozen ground conditions). Following the 12th month of permanent cover with no construction activity, inspections may be terminated until construction activity is once again initiated or sooner if notified in writing by the MPCA. 3). Where work has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions, the required inspections and maintenance schedule must begin within 24 hours after runoff occurs at the site or prior to resuming construction, whichever occurs first. Inspection Records The SWPPP Coordinator shall maintain inspection records during construction. These must be recorded in writing within 24 hours of the inspection and /or maintenance activity. The inspection records shall include the following: 1). Date and time of inspections 2). Name of person(s) conducting inspection 3). Findings of inspections, including recommendations for corrective actions 4). Corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities) 5). Date and amount of any rainfall events greater than 1/2" in 24 hours a). The Contractor shall install and maintain a rain au e at the construction site in order to verify rainfall amounts. g 9 Y 6). If any discharge is observed to be occurring during the inspection, a record of all points of the property from which there is a discharge must be made, and the discharge shall be described (i.e., color, odor, floating, settled, or suspended solids, foam, oil sheen, and other obvious indicators of pollutants) and photographed. 7). Documentation of any changes to the SWPPP made during construction a). If the SWPPP coordinator observes that a BMP fails on a regular basis and believes that it is ineffective, it shall be his /her responsibility to notify the Engineer of such deficiencies. The Engineer may then amend the SWPPP (see "Amending the SWPPP") Note: Copies of all inspection records shall be submitted to the Engineer. AMENDING THE SWPPP During he construction of this project it may become necessary to amend this SWPPP. Should the responsibility of installing, g p l Y rY p Y g• inspecting and maintaining the erosion and sediment control devices and techniques described in this SWPPP be transferred from the current Contractor to another Contractor, or from the current Contractor to the Owner, this SWPPP shall be updated accordingly. The Owner will also be required to complete an "Permit Modification Form ". Should it be determined, during construction, by the SWPPP Coordinator, Engineer, or Regulatory Officials that deficiencies in this SWPPP exist, or if significant changes are made to the design /scope of this project that impact erosion prevention and sediment control, the Engineer shall be notified immediately. The Engineer will then review potential deficiencies and /or significant changes to project design /scope, and make necessary changes to the SWPPP. After changes are made to the SWPPP, the Engineer will issue the necessary documentation, reflecting the changes, to the owner and to the SWPPP Coordinator. The SWPPP Coordinator shall be responsible to make sure that this documentation is added to the on -site SWPPP copy and that the changes described in the documentation is implemented on -site. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS Standards and References Materials and construction methods of all BMPs included in this SWPPP shall be as per the Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction, latest edition. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and familiarize themselves with the specification sections applicable to this SWPPP, as there are several BMPs that specifically reference these sections. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall be expected to be familiar with the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with these specification sections. Undisturbed Areas If shown on the plan, the Contractor shall delineate areas that are not to be disturbed on the site. This may be done with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc., and shall be completed prior to the start of any grading operations. Regardless of the delineation method the Contractor chooses to use, the Contractor must communicate to his /her personnel and subcontractors that these areas are not to be disturbed and construction equipment (including trucks and personal vehicles) shall not be allowed in these areas. The Contractor shall minimize compaction and preserve topsoil as much as possible at the site. In pervious ( "green ") areas that are not essential to the construction of the project, the Contractor shall avoid construction traffic and maintain the existing condition of these areas. Temoorary and Permanent Stabilization All exposed soil areas (including stockpiles) shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 7 days of construction activity temporarily or permanently ceasing in that portion of the site. Temporary or permanent drainage ditches or swales, which drain off -site or to a surface water, and are within 200 lineal feet of the property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 24 hours of construction. Placement of temporary or permanent cover shall be initiated immediately upon suspension or completion of excavation operations. Temporary Cover If the Contractor chooses to halt grading operations in a portion of the site (or the whole site) for a period exceeding 7 days, and grading operations (rough or finish grading) in the affected areas has not yet been completed, temporary cover shall be placed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary cover within 24 hours of connection. Depending on the Contractor's schedule, the temporary cover shall consist of one of the following BMPs: 1). Discanchored Mulch a). Discanchored mulch may be used in an area of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively short, but exceeds 7 days. b). The mulch shall be Type 3 per MNDOT Spec. 3882 c). An adequate quantity of mulch shall be evenly distributed to achieve 90% coverage of the exposed soils. d). Mulch shall be placed as per MNDOT 2575.3C. e). All mulch shall be disc anchored as per MNDOT 2575.3D. Prior to the placement and discanchoring of the mulch, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2574. f). Any areas that are exposed as a result of wind action after the initial mulch placement shall be covered with additional mulch to maintain 90% coverage. 2). Temporary Seeding with Mulch a). Temporary seeding with mulch may be used in areas of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively long. Although mulch still needs to be applied as described above, once the temporary seeding /turf is established, the mulch will no longer need to be maintained. The temporary seeding /turf will require very little maintenance. b). Prior to the sowing of temporary seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2574. c). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mixes 21 -1 1 1, 21-112, or 21-113 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for temporary seeding. d). Temporary seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.36. e). Once temporary seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above. Permanent Cover: Upon completion of finish grading and /or placement of topsoil, initiation of the placement of permanent cover shall begin immediately over all exposed areas. This includes areas designated for impervious surfacing (ie: buildings, pavements /gravel bases, sidewalks, etc.). Where the construction schedule will not allow for the placement of the permanent impervious surfacing within 7 days of the completion of finish grading, temporary cover shall be provided in these areas as described above until the Y p g g• p rY P permanent impervious surfacing can be constructed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water, shall be provided with permanent cover within 24 hours of connection. Areas designated for permanent turf establishment shall be provided with one or more of the following BMPs (see plan): 1). Permanent Seeding with Mulch a). Unless otherwise noted on the plans, all areas designated for turf establishment shall be provided with permanent seeding. b). In addition to the plan included as part of this SWPPP, the Contractor shall verify if a Landscaping Plan has been included in the plans by the Architect. If a Landscape Architect has specified higher quality p ermanent cover ( ie: sod h droseedin g• etc.), the Contractor shall provide this permanent cover in lieu of the permanent seeding specified in this SWPPP. c). Prior to the sowing of permanent seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2574. d). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mix 25 -131 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for permanent seeding. e). Permanent seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec.. 2575.36. f). Once permanent seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above (under Temporary Cover), unless noted otherwise. 2). Erosion Control Blanket a). Erosion control blanket shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. These areas shall still be provided with permanent seeding, as described above, beneath the erosion control blanket. b). Erosion control blanket shall meet the requirements indicated in MNDOT Spec. 3885. See plan for category(s) of erosion control blanket. c). Erosion control blanket shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3G2. d). Erosion control blanket specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading (including permanent seeding). 3). Riprap a). Riprap shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). All riprap shall be underlain with Type 4 geotextile fabric. The fabric shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511.362. c). Riprap materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3601, and shall be Class 3, unless noted otherwise on the plans. d). Riprap shall be considered "Random Riprap" and shall be laced as per MNDOT Spec. 251 1. P p p p p e). Although it is permitted for the riprap to be placed with machinery, it will be necessary for the Contractor to hand place some of the riprap in order to provide a dense, well -keyed layer of stones with the least practical quantity of void space. f). The minimum thickness of the riprap shall be 18 inches, unless otherwise noted on the plans. g). Riprap designated at the end of pipe outlets shall be placed within 24 hours of installation of the pipe outlet end section. h). Riprap specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading. Sediment Control The following sediment control BMPs shall be implemented as part of this project: 1). Silt Fence a). Silt fence shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Silt fence shall be machine sliced and materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). Silt fence shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.362. d). Silt fence shall be installed prior to any upgradient grading operations, and shall remain in place and maintained adequately until upgradient areas achieve Final Stabilization (see below) e). Silt fence shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment on the upstream side of the fence reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. Repair or replacement of silt fence shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. f). Portions of silt fence may be removed to accommodate short -term activities, such as vehicle passage. Short -term activities shall be completed as quickly as possible, and new silt fence installed immediately after completion of the short -term activity. If rainfall is imminent or forecasted in the near future, new silt shall be installed regardless of if the short term activity has been completed or not. The Contractor is advised to schedule short term activities during dry weather as much as practicable. No additional compensation will be paid due to additional silt fence associated with short -term activities. g). Temporary soil stockpiles shall be placed on the site in areas upgradient from silt fence. Where the Contractor chooses to place temporary soil stockpiles outside designated silt fenced areas, the stockpiles shall be surrounded by additional silt fence. Under no circumstances shall temporary soil stockpiles be placed over surface waters, curb and gutter, catch basins, culvert inlets or outlets, or ditches. 2). Catch Basin Protection a). WIMCO Road Drain protection devices, as manufactured by WIMCO, shall be used for catch basin protection on this project. WIMCO can be contacted at (952)- 233 -3055, and their web page is www.roaddrain.com. b). "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be installed at all catch basin locations immediately after placement of the catch basin structures. "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until permanent surfacing is constructed (ie: curb and gutter, pavements, and /or gravel surfacing). In areas designated for turf establishment, "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas is established. c). Upon construction of the permanent surfacing, the "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be replaced with the WIMCO product specified on the plans. The WIMCO devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). The contractor shall install and maintain the catch basin protection devices as per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. 3). Culvert Inlet Protection a). Culvert inlet protection shall be provided at all culvert inlet locations immediately after construction of the culvert. See plan included in this SWPPP for culvert inlet locations. b). Culvert inlet protection shall consist of geotextile fabric wrapped around, and completely covering the inlet end section. The geotextile fabric shall be the same fabric used in silt fence applications and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). The culvert inlet protection shall remain in place and adequately maintained until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). Culvert inlet protection shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment reaches 1/2 of the diameter of the culvert pipe. Repair or replacement of culvert inlet protection shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. 4). Temporary Rock Construction Entrance a). Temporary rock construction entrances shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. See detail for temporary rock entrance design. b). If the Contractor chooses to access the site from locations other than where temporary rock entrances are specified on the plans, additional temporary rock entrances shall be placed at these locations, as well. c). Temporary rock entrance shall be constructed prior to the start of grading operations, and shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until Final Stabilization has been established. q Y d). Temporary rock entrances shall be maintained in such a manner that the entrances prevent sediment tracking onto adjacent streets. If a temporary rock entrance is found to be ineffective, it shall be replaced or improved within 24 hours of discovery. e). The Contractor has the option to place Type 4 geotextile fabric beneath the temporary rock entrance. The fabric may extend the life of the entrance as it will reduce rock "sinking" into the underlying soils. If the Contractor chooses to use fabric, it should meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 251 1.362. f). If sediment tracking from the site is discovered on adjacent streets, the sediment shall be removed with a street sweeper or other approved method within 24 hours of discovery. This shall be done throughout construction of the project. This sediment may be returned and graded over exposed areas of the site, or disposed of off site per MPCA requirements. The City may order street sweeping to be performed at the Contractor's or Owner's expense if City staff find that construction activities are resulting in sediment or debris being tracked onto City streets. 5). Filter Logs a). Filter logs shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Filter logs shall consist of Type Wood Fiber biorolls and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3897. c). Filter logs shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3F. d). Filter logs shall be installed immediately after placement of erosion control blanket. e). Filter logs shall remain in place for the life of the project, and shall be allowed to degrade naturally. Dewatering If dewatering of sandy subsoils is required for this project, the pump discharge shall be treated prior to discharge off -site or into a surface water. Treatment of discharge shall be achieved with the use of a "Dandy Dewatering Bag" (or approved equivalent), as manufactured by Dandy Products,lnc. Dandy Products, Inc. can be contacted at (877) 307 -0141, and their web page is www.dandyproducts.com. The "Dandy Dewatering Bag" shall be installed, utilized, and maintained per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. Once dewatering water has been treated, it may be discharged off -site or to a surface water. The discharge shall be visually checked to ensure that it is relatively clean and not visibly different from any receiving waters. If discharge is noticeably "dirty ", the Engineer shall be contacted as additional treatment methods may be necessary. Adequate erosion control shall be provided at the point of discharge if it is located in an area with exposed soils or established turf. This erosion control may consist of temporarily P laced rip rap, or other approved energy dissipation measures. The type of erosion control measure shall be at the Contractor's discretion, depending on the location of the dewatering discharge and the unique site characteristics. The erosion control measures shall be effective and shall be maintained adequately such that no erosion occurs at the point of discharge. Pollution Prevention Management Solid waste accumulated during construction, including collected sediment, construction materials, floating debris, construction debris, paper, plastics, and other solid wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA disposal requirements: 1). Building products that have the potential to leach pollutants shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by a similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with storm water. 2). Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemicals, and landscape materials shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. 3). Hazardous materials, toxic waste, (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum -based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids) shall be properly stored in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access storage areas shall be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous materials shall be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. 4). Solid waste shall be stored, collected and disposed of properly in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. 5). Portable toilets shall be positioned so that they are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over. Sanitary waste must be disposed of properly in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. The Contractor shall take steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. The Contractor shall conduct fueling in a contained area unless infeasible. The Contractor shall ensure adequate supplies are available at all times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled materials. The Contractor shall report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. § 1 15.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. If the Contractor washes the exterior of vehicles or equipment on the project site, washing shall be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff from the washing area shall be contained in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and waste from the washing activity shall be properly disposed of. The Contractor shall properly use and store soaps, detergents, or solvents. No engine degreasing shall be allowed on site. The Contractor shall provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. The liquid and solid washout wastes shall not contact the ground, and the containment shall be designed so that it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes shall be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCA rules. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposal of concrete and other washout wastes. FINAL STABILIZATION Final Stabilization shall be considered established once the following requirements have been achieved: 1). All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils are stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of its expected final growth density over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions. 2). The permanent storm water management system is constructed, and is operating as designed. Temporary or permanent sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins have been cleaned of any accumulated sediment. All sediment has been removed from conveyance systems and ditches are stabilized with permanent cover. 3). All temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs have been removed from the project site. BMPs designed to decompose on site may be left in place. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (D T O N r- O T I- I W J G m D U) U J > U The Contractor is solely responsible for the cleanup of any wetlands, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, other waters of the State (as defined by the MPCA's General Storm Water Permit), ground or roadway surfaces or other property damaged by construction activity related to this project. Besides the NPDES permit (MPCA General Storm Water Permit), the Contractor shall also obtain all other necessary local government permits related to erosion and sediment control, if applicable (ie: Watershed District, County Soil and Water Conservation District, MNDOT, etc.). This SWPPP is intended to provide a plan for addressing the erosion prevention and storm water management issues associated with this project.. It is to be used in conjunction with the project plans, specifications, and the MPCA General Storm Water Permit. In addition to the SWPPP, the Owner, Contractor, and SWPPP Coordinator shall familiarize themselves with the actual requirements indicated in the MPCA General Storm Water Permit itself and are responsible for compliance with the permit's terms, requirements, and conditions. The Engineer can provide a copy of the permit upon request. 0) W 2 0 z I o- n co 0 co U O N C 70 a >, -a 0 ;_ QR -0 N N N . U } N C _ Q Z) � N V) O N C N 0- > E -0 1 -0 } _ C3 - t � a - �L } O_ N N 0-a-0 o C a - :-3;Z,00 a) It � c N O N .- C N 0- 0-0) C -r- Q) N w 12 w CL CD Z 0�Z W (D W � Z CD 0 Z Ww J D C45 2 U ls:� �V0000le Z O CL U Ln w 0 a` CV d' 0 Z Q) C V) N U J .. 0 " 0 L� I r a 00 O 0 T O i i N 6) co > co co - co (0 C( 0c) M 80 N Q_ ILL -c O E O U C 0) .F 4 N 0) C 0 O N :3 C N 0) Q N r- :3 co 0 N (0 >_ LO � If Z 3: =02 3: :3 N = O - O U) :t i 00:3(Z r(n(n V) w Z � O 0 wO N �� v � Z 0 Cn O H ►i Z 0 �___ n C) Q V Z n I 00 11-O M PROJECT NUMBER: 16057 C4 of 7 Q 0 V) W Z :E O I I W U Z a 59 cccc V) l2(O0 L� J p c r U 3 7-COW X¢U - MW WF OO rn Fa MOIL v r? 0.1 z�U Wa J' m a o W ¢ Ld r V) l2(O0 L� J p ym (nwa OF 7-COW X¢U U U L W CL LX OFNam WF to J UMWW Wow 002 v EMU)- z�U U 2 i= °O�ZU W ¢ 00 W zOD ¢a J LLJ o xEmD- ¢ Jp Om0 Z. Ua O¢m ¢ J Q��� MLpo sl 2 m W F o a v Z (3 00¢ UQL1 ap Aa) OWm WJ ZUL, Wm= mW0 J O¢ a OREL W wM2 HE U) 10 I a c a1 E C VQ ° ? m + m O •d ym m CL O Z) d Oo ELL L U U U L W N U J c U U W ry Q M 0_ w J_ Lw I- Z w 0 III (n Q LL_ O Z o_ U 0_ H In Z 0 U Z Q F_ Z w w U a_ LnzF� JD x� WD Z[r m N O ¢ a L W LL CL o� WJQ¢ a w z oJQ I'\ �I N • W ? W U W Z LOCI 00 W 3 O W w oo c 3 C Z O Lz J w J W oW Q Ua W ZO W -�°>� ED == Q D dCWJ O U1 VWj aNiplcj a OO~ FmZx rQQ-� Wa W wo IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS o J� a LUQ =� w ¢ M ¢o Jo rw m Of Ux W V) �¢ F- MW ¢� Lim F- mw LLJ J ?Z Zp L11�0~ O- OJ OQ � HW F Q a o�o� W J¢ Z WN Y J LLIa M W W Q� r- w tt -0 0 Fm Z o0za 00 W W z r pm ~W rd Uj< z o Wa ¢Q J UJ 0!J ¢ 0_W >>FX W0! WU r O) �~Fd mLn¢ UQN L,J(0 a'~ a} oW NX W¢ >¢ N~ W L'"l W LZ,� N¢ >_ 11 Lad ¢O� UN =w H= Y ?p max wo W wW Wz Z W W L� ¢�' Edv3 O Z w Uf2 J W zo JWx QO p0 Wm W �x w� Nm(n V). -0 MM J a w M W W O J ¢ W U m d c 3 Zm aO w J o �� W N w~ Z �� m N j �W CL WVI U�Z W¢ 0_¢ �¢ ?OU EcO H No l~iW J(00 ¢0:'?¢ F-m as p2 Wx a U ZF- 0) Ll ® !n J W O W J m W Q O d Ii U ll ii I`1 0) ? J a Ce Q M N ¢ M Z 0¢ U m 0� O X Wm Of w OF- Na O Qm 0w I 2W U Z m¢ !nx OJ T4) °; ' ' ~ W L, O W O O L, W W d 6 w r S Z N w c F- �O SLY =J 0� I.— W Z N �« w U m U, OjW o aw Of \.�. WMZ> Z L�j O! QJ �a N� N U J c U U W ry Q M 0_ w J_ Lw I- Z w 0 III (n Q LL_ O Z o_ U 0_ H In Z 0 U Z Q F_ Z w w U a_ Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 or CA -25 Riprap P- ,',,;r„ Title: Residential Building Erosion Control )ate: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 6006 03 -15 ( Pr)fPyFIP fr SECTION B —B (not to scale) Original grade ,l plates NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment trapping device 1 • H- Cn X W Match Existing Grade �\ JtI.IIVIV H -H (not to scale) Sediment Trapping Device Original grade 5U min. or Right of Way PLAN Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: 0 E E 0 0 .t -p 6 6 N 6 t Commercial Gravel Construction Entrance )ate: 06 -14 Plate No. Revised: 6002 03 -15 PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. * FOR THE NEW R- 3290 —VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. OVERFLOW Standard Plate Library City of Monticello OF 1EIGHT DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW IS %2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY z--CURB T FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" ON -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH -FLOW FABRIC Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert )ate: 03 -07 Plate No. Revised: 6004 03-15 OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD Standard Plate Library City of Monticello NG NUT TACHMENT HOOK .T FABRIC SLEEVE R MnDOT SPECIAL OVISION 3886 SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 Title: Inlet Protection Grate Inlet Cover )ate: 03 -07 Plate No. Revised: 03 -15 6005 (n w J 0 Q 0- U (n w z Q Cy w O w J m jo �O� 00 O m C( EL o t a_ d J m x CO Z � O O U 2 W ¢ U) W W � J X 0 O (WO N J Z U1 w �w V):5 00 J it D 0" Q z�a z c =w a lac N Z , 0 Z O ¢ ¢-J �0 LnzF� JD x� WD Z[r m N O ¢ a z Li cn Lf) ¢ LL CL o� WJQ¢ JrZ OFZW 2 r Ni M � LL I'\ �I N • W ? W U W Z LOCI Y W W Z W o W T ° Z O Lz J w J W oW Q UN JNm ° V) W D Q U ZL/)>_ J} 00 O) p Z F U D O c 0 d- ¢¢IoW (V d O H Z, a i SI A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454 -0002) ~ r U)MU)m IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS o W PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 or CA -25 Riprap P- ,',,;r„ Title: Residential Building Erosion Control )ate: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 6006 03 -15 ( Pr)fPyFIP fr SECTION B —B (not to scale) Original grade ,l plates NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment trapping device 1 • H- Cn X W Match Existing Grade �\ JtI.IIVIV H -H (not to scale) Sediment Trapping Device Original grade 5U min. or Right of Way PLAN Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: 0 E E 0 0 .t -p 6 6 N 6 t Commercial Gravel Construction Entrance )ate: 06 -14 Plate No. Revised: 6002 03 -15 PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. * FOR THE NEW R- 3290 —VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. OVERFLOW Standard Plate Library City of Monticello OF 1EIGHT DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW IS %2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY z--CURB T FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" ON -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH -FLOW FABRIC Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert )ate: 03 -07 Plate No. Revised: 6004 03-15 OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD Standard Plate Library City of Monticello NG NUT TACHMENT HOOK .T FABRIC SLEEVE R MnDOT SPECIAL OVISION 3886 SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 Title: Inlet Protection Grate Inlet Cover )ate: 03 -07 Plate No. Revised: 03 -15 6005 (n w J 0 Q 0- U (n w z Q Cy w O w J m jo �O� 00 O m C( EL o t a_ d J m x CO Z � O O U 2 W ¢ U) W W � J X 0 O (WO N J Z U1 w �w V):5 00 J it D 0" Q z�a z c =w a lac N Z , 0 Z O ¢ ¢-J �0 OW m N J00? DOOF m a z I w of O w 0 0 �og In o N g o� 0 a p °C z a U to Lr W x LLI LWn 0 L, ° N N� o w Standard Plate Library City of Monticello 07 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. 4:1 SLOPES N W Z Y U H Lal N N Z �5 as a? Ll 0 aW r Oz U W z 0 W w Mm W J LLJ i D: H O Z Title: Riprap Detail Date: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 4009 03 -15 1.15 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. 3:1 SLOPES 0° • �20 J • • is • • • 3.75 STAPLES PER SQ. YD. HIGH FLOW CHANNEL & SHORELINE 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED 2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" (15cm) DEEP X 6" (15cm) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES /STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" (30om) PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES /STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. 3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES /STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING OPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM, STAPLES /STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. 4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2 " -5" (5cm- 12.5m) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE, TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE COLORED SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. 5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3" (7.5cm) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. NOTE: "IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" (15cm) MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Erosion Control Blanket Stapling Patterns & Installation Date: 03 -08 Plate No. Revised: 03 -15 6011 SWPPP - DETAILS - U N Cfl O CY) O N �E 0 0 O Z O U -0 U T Q 2 N O T In 0 Q W� J — Q -~ Q O (D N } Q O O U O cn W � � .N N i L L 0 Q� C m D N w U J (0 � O 0O T U U co co �Z^•/ o co - 0) W c W N M 00 Z W 0_ LL -C E V 0 Z Ww .N v / L L. J a) Z) 0 Q N U) L U U� i J 01 U Cfl O N CY) O N �E 0 0 O Z O U -0 U T Q 2 i, ti T n 0 O U Link Fance I � � \ O � O fie ♦ // l �o —j 6 10 C: N C14 IE j O U O m / Go comb spain __ () 0 O U ♦ / / /� l/ RIM= 960.57 - -Edge of Plen11, /1L 0 /0<- .N W O s 0T 31NyCLUSTER VY'j INV? =95).) � Oft'or Vi ^` O T-i1 CT BIN 1• G o W Q Q Vr 'L ♦ /gyp /�� J/ * / / -C a)Dc m / /� / 963 CT BIN / -1T HDPE ` — L N W IN U / / ^ E / 1 1 no # / 0 ° \�SSa /a V (D 00 O i I 7 ry� go dU \ \ CT 6IN / �$ Z 0 T co co / I 3�? C7 0) r n 0 PERIMETER SILT / /� (t,ey4E e Y 3 �� / Aqe° \ Q` %sue � I' v_ co 00 O a 6 . - -Right of Access deeded I. the State of Minnesota /" FENCE (TYP) // d tl<yz)�O FNTROL% I oeprR S`aea _ esegea\ \rem'�c \ / ParD.c. —I N. s.z426)9.266p62,ana266991 w `... N BLA�I, KET YP)�' 4s �� �e p °"gr �� -C X � // PROPOSED —� / ^a A ; r ^ Q C AUILDING // EdgeotPlante Sg \ i V O Z/� ADDITION S / /I FFE963.5 -J/ f _ Edgeof Concrete -�r�r j't� }�� / /',% / Building Entrance 0—aoQ '' ' i \ , Umerg,, del—, v, Gopher ape -- /� RIM ss9.n `` w (n ♦ / ,/0/ / / 2° O e dCe \ 11•- -pp HDPE Storm Sewer �� CD / slerm Be— .,-an "eo,.�1, per dry Plans \ N ; / /// 6 °��♦ /� / / / //' /' / // / \ J N ,/ A Qy ♦ // / / / J / \ /�`- 'I `� - -Chan link Fencc J / ° -Moon Motors Sign / / / 06 [ •� V W c // /// / ♦♦ /'/ /// // /// Edge °, °° / y° o¢�e \ i / /// <� \�Q \ O Q N Gnnerete Surface I \ �1� o / Flagpole - -,, I DT BIN CLUSTER/ b/, /�\ / 01 1\ U W / ki GUtlr Easement tall - =r / agevan dY PerP -Cl CO r= - -Edge of Planter - C/ qr �' 6 11)IJ ♦ // rypans _I 1' W �4 / / •iii U / �`e DT 6IN _ ( V•-- Untlargmuntl EI - -Tel hone Pedestal L 1 -Storm Sewer Me hale 1�• N / 0¢ - -Slortn Sower Clean OUt/ 8•PVC Storm Sewer Per ct Edge (/Concrete - -i f 'I'm 960a b \er G`pM1er� //� -- 9 J \� LO --S (\ - Edge of Concrete% I, /\ \�C / INV NW. = 956 dl / iGu tle//Vir / Y / /' \ Ercisting BUiltling / I -I 1 ,NV SE. =9563` / l�� / �'s / ♦ / I #3fi 13 Chelsea R-d W. / / ` / �� / YT \J -C 0 C / ' / I 1 .-- Underground El�ctrc � / y CV) G GT 6IN 6IN par Gopher Dne \ 6 '/ / / }1 ��/ \ COnaeta Cc,11 Ip1, I \ J29� ^ � (\ — CT SIN / ' �\ / /♦ \ 0 Al INSTALL CATCH ♦ I \ / O V_/ BASIN PROTECTION / _ ♦ / 1 o0�cs 2 Bituminous Surface /� / Curb C,ZP / T U) U) O U TL O T�, D,' / �b � &h / / N I / Concrete C9rb (BS,2, . (360- / / o t / l / ♦ / ♦ / 0 Ping (yp-l� / / concrete sertace / CT 6IN / e ll'svi t CATEGORY 3 G dge of N // Qa`� r �/ BIN / FFE = 963.4, ��' °f / EROSION CONTROL \` � e c IsIN � ya41N / F� / - - -�/ \/ ♦ BLANKET (TYP) EdgeofCOncrat®l 0 T61N ♦ / PERIMETER SILT ♦ b \e cgnoletacowmnctyP <an G 0`\ FENCE (TYP) q° I / i9 CT61 / CT61N 9 I BencM1mark . / \ -D & � (see NOta zl I � I / wood Fenca\, b CLASS III RIP RAP /m /'/ 6 I / QT BIN OVERLYING TYPE 4 �✓ �a / / / QTBIN ♦/ GEOTEXTILE FABRIC CT41N \ / P Catch Basin I / / 6)imps \ Bu ltl'n9 I � a�Q // / RIM 958.58 IT 41 1 - S \ Overhang a INV NW. = 954.8 I (\ _$1"•,� dCa �r(�/ INV SW. = 95A.3 �'• CT41N \`- - -_ F� cancrate C' Oe / \ ♦ / SILT FENCE 962 962 CATEGORY 3 ♦ AROUND BASIN \ i pe.clyplans Stub L Hans f °` - _ j% f�. NOPE St ♦ / - -Concrete Curb EROSION CONTROL (TYP) I /� QO I ♦ //� / BLANKET (TYP) ° YCT 41N Post Valve Indcata— \ �• IT 41N1 CT 41N \\ 4�,^,y� Watennaln Per c ty Planc % \ %/ 9 `ST13C ^TIaIN CT41N to \ ( `� \ O 9s / %/ / ,/ ♦�� O s1 / Bdall o... sense- � \ ) CLAS� RIP RAP \ pT41N ` �.( O U bVERLYING TYPE-4 GEOTE�XTILE�RIC: / / / Concrete Curb -1 DoncreteCm9 -/ / \ '�. � � INSTALL CATC / � /� e� O / BASIN PROT TI / Dr inage and Uhllly =asem�iplaF� CLARIP RkP / fi tlargr °andrelapM1ena Z \ \ r J per GOPM1er iYIM e�3 s.l OVERLYING- tTYPE "4... '/ DT 1N\ OCK GEOTEXLLE FABRIC �. R <. ` / f /� ♦♦ / / IL TEMPORAR /E/ CONSTRUCTION �I " /F \� o�as000 �\ se 9 CLASS I III P /� / / // DT \ / / U ENTRANCE \ \� P �� s�. / v> \ I So (� � \ \ \`par � OVERLYING.TYP 4 / ( PERIMETER Si 1T f j ♦ , w GEOTEXTILE F B / FENCE (TYP) / ♦ / 0 `tS41N \ `.` �\ \ ..� // / / per, One \ O \ /© / ♦ / TelephtoobdIPedestal DT 41N / ♦ '!1 \ I Y_.UCatchBalSin / "M Manhole N w \ IM= 958.)4 / =95919 /, / C� 1 / F \ NGSE.= 952.9 / '/"IN = 94)5(/ / / �6 ♦ Q CATEGORY 3 II s6 �\ / O I �♦ EROSIONNTROL I-�� \ ' lDateh Basin / 962 DT 41N I / O BLANKET (TYP) \ �` r'r // IINIM =95 <a6 PERIME SILT'; LU (irn �Undsr nd rclel -.. J.- ^-Croat, Base DT , J grh, !T w O .--F Via.- � Per Gopher One � � 1 / ♦ N C'7 V \ FENCE (TYP P� ` �/ // �boTrepnePedeatal / Z I- -Moon Moto@ Sign � paps. I Fiber Opt, Hnnd H °I1, / OUTLO T G L- Sanitary ManM1°le \\ \ RIM = 959.33 �`` \� ©DT 41N '•-- LndG,pho nd Fiber Optic \ / Gopher One \v/ \ - - -- Overhead Utility Line (typical) O Y V) O ,O ' ^0— v / V) ' LU z z 5z O 0 L O J O Z � J 00 LU z U p 1= z O O N 0 E PROJECT SWPPP - PLAN VIEW 1 NUMBER: a_ 16057 N SCALE: 1't =40' Ln 0 0 40 80 160 C6 OF 7 Link Fencs It" und619mvnd Elepmc / / ♦ /� ' / // l' RIM = 9b0.57.- / / ♦ / / , /qq�� 0< INV yyy��� --- 95).8 ` /31N CLUSTER 9577 CT m Ofto ANT FMS T /,q TF 963 J CT SIN 1z^ NDPE 6IN Cenonce, Cur` < ge4du a d 61N ' 031\ / `\ BS's o Ege ofW / / I I I 9�� I / / 'aa33 9aeasS qfa /- - -R.,D Access tleededlotM1e66DO2 .Minnesota J/ � 6 Jve U — ,n/ per Document No's. 242679. 2fi6002, and 2fi6001 / d,\ •C e +RS`s � -- � BUILDING ,/ EdgeofPlanter -- a sa \ \ / ADDITION ryYW�/ /1 —_ -Edge ofCOncrele-- �E - 963.5V/ / FFE= 963.5— `�\ / Bmmm9 Enlranoa o ema % —catch eaain MATC H \ par GOyh aslecvic �• RIM =gfio.n �.. AT °�e per perap\ EXISTING nIN_ / e +a� _ ° le. \ - -1z NDPE S, „PAVEM T \ /term3ewer.leanD� des \ pereifyplan (TYP) \ 1oonmotorsSig, BIT MINOUS / �� ° THICKENED EDGE Edge d ,`` n � \ P EMENT / Q o SIDEWALK ncretes,f \ ( P) DT 3IN CLUSTER O \ CLASS 2 GRAVEL ♦ '/ i' �/ / , / geO pole s I °, b/ / P I age add Utility E ... m dtperpiaF 7J /\� / r•- Ed f Plenler — / SURFACING (TYP) / / / / / // BITUMINOUS DT 61N _ ( / p ��] 1 PAVEMENT ° ct Ions I ` �ee 1 •- -Dndergmund Eli a I / Tel M1one Pedestal .Storm Sewer Ma M1 I / /- -Slortn S =war C =eon OUt Storm Sewer par yP Edge ./Concrete - -:I f RIM 96061 b \ar GOpM1er On �_� 96 �utle,4vir NVNW Ed9e et cenerete % / °e (TYP) mss" P I wv sw - 9s6 -51 / / / gBuilding / ,/ / 1 1 =3` I / / #3fi 13 Ch Chelsea Road W. NVSE %6 \ I I .-- Underground E�etr GT 6I`N6N /b \ par Gopher Dne END CURB • / � \v- " Concretaar / �(5-FT TAPER) CT MIN OUTLOT# D// r / / 41 /f Edge of Woods- BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TYP) /brtn6ewerSW /� DT 41N 4�0 erpyplana MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT (TYP) END CURB / (5 FT TAPER) / c4 CT41N2 90\ _Y� �• �/ Wood Fc BITUMINOUS / PAVEMENT) (TYP) CT41N 4* B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) LOT 1 Bituminous Surface I _ —_- -� i C,Z / N I / / - Concrete Curb (B612) jj60- 1- P.,51ripin9(typ -l) /' ♦ / O CT SIR ar.on. 1I" MATCH FFE = 963.4 -, �Q" °f I �-i ya'a ' EXISTING \ e C 6IN ® _/T'� \` Edge of COncret.l C' 0 �F FA /� —JT61N / /9 G y\ / Conc9atecolumn(typical) (TY I as CT61r* I 6enchma / I CT IN // ( / O � (Se-12, r" °Dram I C 8,11N / / BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT I P Catch Basin �� pmn9 (TYP) MATCH a ` a9Q RIM = 958.59 -'\ /I / rCT 41N \ Wood Fv ESSw9. 11 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT / (TYP) Overhang J INV NW. = 95454 .8 EXISTING Edge 9 /'�a 0 INV SW =93 x '- PAVEMENT 4., (TYP) ^( s , / vane a / Concrete Curb CT 4IN pert. 8 / / CTa,N Post Valve Indicates - -+ / / * �T 41N CT 41N m THICKENED EDGE., \ C\ SIDEWALK (BOTH �41N cT41" ES OF SID / Bitfllnicnrs5rrta A / � /��� DT 41N a \ \ ( / THICKEN EI�'E © ` �O,Nph.,Oneep�r6 \` \\ s X35 �� / SIDEWALK 9txp` ` \ \\ \ \ �e4 / / Concrete Cur6-1 Concrete Cm9 B612 CURB & �\ \ \\ ` \\ GUTTER (TYP) TTC _ / \\ rypl '1 : Rl�uit 954.32 ' \ \\ \ \\ / ,/ N-+H /' / // Dr ina9e and Utility= asem�ipl,A� C NCRETE ~� s \ \ EXI TING / 1 CONCRETE / j /' i n / DRI WAY \t GewerManhole \ \ \ \ der dG \ \ / PAVEMENT li' SIDEWALK i� /� / RI 53.6) �•. ` \ `p \ \ ` / {TYP) i / /� \ \ \ dargroana Telephone 1-.. ENTRAN \ Per GOPM1er One / catch saein �\, \ RIM pT 41N� \ \ / \ DT 4IN I s/\ (� � ` \ � +,a \ \ \�/ , � � f j ♦ / 4" CONCRETE \\ \�\ �1 MATCH i ♦ / ( MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) rySg �4114 \ \ D ` \— / r`x'-/ EXISTING /� ' One 5 i ` J CURB (TYP) //0 \ \\ \ Phon€Pedeslal // DT41N Tele M�959.19bo1�/ INb�E�--952.0 INV= 94zsf// , / \ \5 © ♦ / 4 . 4" MNDOT 3149.262 SELECT II `\ \ \ ' lcatenBae 962r DT MIN ) / ° GRANULAR BORROW S 4 -CDncrele Base DT 161N 1 O LUndergrountl teleph / \a ` per Gopher One / © one / Pedestal t --Moo, Moto ,CSln 9 /'✓1 Pb " ♦ III — III — III — III — III — III — III — III — III — III —I I I / I— III — III —III -111 ; ,111 -III; III —III —I = III =11 Fiber Optic Hand Holl., III — III — III —� I I � I I— - -I APPROVED COMPACTED \ /�b �� �; \�\ Nero \v /� \J / II I II II �� II II I II SUBGRADE OUTLO G V \ L- Sanitary ManM1ole `'\ \ RIM = 959.33 \\ ©DT 4IN CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL \ \� ''.-- LG,phO,r4oU One ,0 berOpfic pe, BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. rz COQ FOuRGU IN i CURHLLT WITH CURB SURFACING NOTES: SUBGRADES SHALL BE SCARIFIED AND /OR COMPACTED AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN THE REQUIRED COMPACTION DESCRIBED IN THE GENERAL NOTES (SHEET Cl). TEST ROLLING OF THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR TECHNICIAN. LOCATIONS EXHIBITING EXCESSIVE RUTTING (PER MNDOT SPEC. 211 1) SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE. COMPACTION TESTING IN UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM. 2. GRAVEL BASE COURSES SHALL BE ROLLED AND COMPACTED. TEST ROLLING OF THE GRAVEL BASE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A SOILS ENGINEER TO VERIFY STABILITY. 3. ALL EXISTING BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE EDGES, WHICH WILL ABUT NEW BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE SURFACING SHALL BE SAWCUT TO OBTAIN A VERTICAL EDGE. 4. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE NEW CONCRETE ABUTS EXISTING CONCRETE, AND AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE SEPARATE CONCRETE POURS ABUT EACH OTHER. 5. SEE SHEET C1 FOR SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS, AND CURB AND GUTTER. JOINTS JOINTSJ'v" PLAN -B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 7 "MIN. VARIABLE 1/ P w /MIN 7 ER FT---, H 5 MIN. SECTION A —A SECTION B —B Standard Plate Library for j the City of Monticello Title: --- = - - - -- Commercial Driveway Entrance Dote: 03 -05 Plate No. Revised: 5007 IN U N (D O Q) — T � O N �E 0 0 O Z O U -0 U T Q N T "' 0 U U Q W Ln _j Q _ 10 IE 6- U O M (D O cn W � � Z) .N N O O N C N } Q Q C m 1(` — Co w U J (0 CY) 0O T U U � Z o-0) W0 W M 00 � Zw 0- U- -C rn Q U U E V O Z U W w IN U) J a) Z) W Q N U (D ^L, (D'^ N LO W W1^ / -C O 2 iQN = N � U) U) Z O IL V) w 0 Z F- 0 0 V) wO N CIO 't � Z \\ \ 2521.3C2 Z Utility Line (typical) O 3 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION NTS \ NOTES 4" MNDOT CLASS 2 (100% CRUSHED) PER FT SLOP 1. FOR AREAS WHERE DRAINAGE IS DIRECTED AWAY I II II III —I —I —I —I —_II II AGGREGATE SURFACING V) Q 4 FROM THE CURB, THE GUTTER SHALL BE TILTED TO —� —I —� II__ 12' BITUMINOUS WEARING CONCRETE DRAIN FROM THE CURB APPROVED COMPACTED Q < COURSE ( MNDOT 2360 TYPE SUBGRADE O O SPWEB340B) 2. CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF PARKING 6" MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A22 LOT 4" CONCRETE 0 � W TACK COAT BETWEEN ( MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) V) BITUMINOUS COURSES 3. MNDOT B612 CURB AND GUTTER SHALL MEET THE 1" CHAMFER Z Z REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 7100 O Z �3 Q —< 12" BITUMINOUS BASE �� ° ~ GRAVEL SURFACING TEST TRAIL) O J COURSE ( MNDOT 2360 TYPE ° ° a 6" ' O SPNWB330B) a� h NTS J I I —I I —I I— III —I I —I I —I I— III —I 1 1 =1 I 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 a ^ 6� I I— III — III — III — III — III — III —III —I I— III — III — III — III — III —III W 7 U 11 —I 11 =1 I I— III -111 -_III. =111 -1 I— III —I 11= —I AGGREGATE BASE = 11= 1= 1= 1= 1 =1 =1 =1 1= I= 1= 1= 1 =1 =1 =1 1= O III = III =1 1 =j 11 1 j -1 1 =1 1 =1 —I APPROVED COMPACTED CLASS 5 COMPACTED MNDOT 4" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT O Z H. I I— I' —III.. I I I =1 I I =1 11 =1 11 =1 11 =1 11 =1 I I 0 0 SUBGRADE — III —III -� I— III — I III BELOW CURB AND GUTTER GRANULAR BORROW VIII 11 1- I I 1 -I 11 =III CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL APPROVED COMPACTED APPROVED COMPACTED � SUBGRADE BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 2521.3C2 PAVING PLAN �, NUMBER: T SUBGRADE 16057 N a_ SCALE: BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION CURB & GUTTER (MNDOT B612) THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK � 1 " =40' 1 NTS % NTS O NTS 0 40 80 160 CID C7 of 7 EXISTING WOODED AREA TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED 0/>- / / W NV EXISTING WOODED AREA TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED W V' EXISTING WOODED AREA TO REMAIN — UNDISTURBED EXISTING BIRCH TREE (1) TO REMAIN T plansW_ o© � (1) AB v v \ N, I, 95 i• LOT NV NE Sev N (1) D ... DT 411N \\ (1) AB \ \� (1) DN \ \ INFILTR ON (1) AB Concrete Ga 9 \ \ BAS I N„ 5 \ W\ v W W W N, (2) DF \ \ \ �� Sgnitary Menhelc \ \ /> ` R17�<95\432 \ � \tYOyrl \ Catch Basin .�W � W W W y RIM = 953.3.1 `�•. % CT 41N wGRA�S /L N P w AaEA (TYP) N, W N, Y W W W N, ry P e \ DT 41N \ A G © W W\ W W W tlergrauntl leciric W GOPM1er .-- Telephone Pedestal \ .ulVliry Vault W ,y Man CM-Basin Ir W RlN xb 7,4 N, = 959.19 .\ V INb�SE =952.0 9475 \ \ 7` LUndergr TalepM1On` per Gophh er One � \ f o \ \ '9O L.S 959 Manhole \\ \ RIM = .33 / Under9�au�M ElecGic ' per Gopher One CatcM1 Basin _ RIM = 960.57 �.✓ INV SW. 95 =95].8 131N CLUSTER INV SE. =957.7 /EXISTING PINE TREE (1) ',. TO REMAIN C 8I0%l - -- Overhead Utility Line (typical) ANT F� \T q TF / / / / I '� lephone Pedestal / OUTI- G Underground ni> \ / per Gopher One , \v/ 8 ,aMinneaela �'f' -9 y a zsssm EXISTING BIRCH TREE (1) TO REMAIN © DT 61N f _ - Telephone Pedestal pla" _I -Storm Sewer Manhole --- Untlergmuntl Elecmc /1�� i• per CleanW Storm Sewer Per C1Y RIM =96061 per Gopher One \ Edge 1�Oncrete -� INV SW. 9566 g "pVC vl INV NW. 9% 4 , RV SE 9563 -Untl g ound El ectric. CT 61N C—N, Curb -• Biuminous Sudarz \ COnerefe Curd (8612) -` -Paint Striping (typical) / \ C .�9 61N/ EXISTINP/PINE TREES (5) TO REMAIN IS n,h,,I--,, y- Note z) i' 0 \l OT I r'I / Catch Basin _. ! INV NW58 994.8 ` \••. / a INV SW. =964.3 EXISTING MAPLE TREE (1) �\ x\ / TO REMAIN \ / / / � Prens ! � eµer Per q / O � / o b \ / J� 0 LANDSCAPING SCHEDULE DECIDUOUS TREES SYMBOL QTY. KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE REMARKS ('�' 3 AB AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE ACER FREMANII 'AUTUMN BLAZE' 2.5" B &B STRAIGHT TRUNK NO V- CROTCH O 0 0— (D \ 5 DN ADEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE ACER PLATANOIDES 2.5" B &B STRAIGHT TRUNK NO V- CROTCH O J L Z ::D O J � b CONIFEROUS TREES p 0 BH BLACK HILLS SPRUCE PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA 6' HT. FULL FORM TO GRADE N SHRUBS 26 NS NORMAN SPIREA SPIREA JAPONICA'NORMAN' 18" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. SPEC. 27 SS SHIBORI SPIREA SPIREA JAPONICA'SHIROBANA' 18" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. SPEC. 3 LE LITTLE ELFIE ARBORVITAE ARBORVITAE, AMERICAN (THUJA)'LITTLE ELFIE' 24" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. SPEC. NOTE: THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. FOR SPECIFIC LANDSCAPING METHODS, DETAILS, AND SPECIFICATIONS A LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONTACTED LANDSCAPE PLAN Q0 T- o N r- 0 T T LU J L D C0 U J U 0) Q 0 U c a J 0 co U O C E O U-0 U C — O V O N Q) Q E O }Q i D- U p 0O •N O 0 (D L O N .- N Q Q C W CL CD Z O� Z W � W U) Zw Z W w J 2 U z 0 D_ V) W 0 Cr CV c� O z (U U J rt 0 CV 0 Lr i N tocoo C7 r U M Co Co (0 5 6-0) M 00 N a u- U U E O U .N O O) C a� a) ( Q N �� ^L, ^(U / \W C Lo l r,0 :3 N = O U) N , � U) U) PROJECT NUMBER: 16057 N SCALE: 111 =40' CLl OF 1 z O z n O Q O 0 0— (D ,O v ) Lu C) z z O 5Z O J L Z ::D O J � b U Lu p -,o O z O N :2 PROJECT NUMBER: 16057 N SCALE: 111 =40' CLl OF 1 z O n ' ^ v ' Q O 0— (D ,O v ) Lu ' ^ V) ' z z O 5Z O J L Z ::D O J z m U Lu p -,o O z O N :2 PROJECT NUMBER: 16057 N SCALE: 111 =40' CLl OF 1 MOON MOTORSPORTS CITY SUBMISSION - NOVEMBER 4, 2016 �f 3613 CHELSEA ROAD MONTICELLO, MN 55362 Monticello Country Cluh "gay r k • rrhls�ry Moon Motarsports Fyrh � DRAWING INDEX T1 TITLE SHEET CIVIL $r R y. dr�y� oayWay�T� �F m' F e � 4� s A MAP C1 GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS C2 STANDARD DETAILS C3 GRADING PLAN C4 SWPPP - NOTES C5 W6r�$r C6 SWPPP - PLAN VIEW Fyrh � DRAWING INDEX T1 TITLE SHEET CIVIL $r R y. dr�y� oayWay�T� �F m' F e � 4� s A MAP C1 GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS C2 STANDARD DETAILS C3 GRADING PLAN C4 SWPPP - NOTES C5 SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C6 SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C7 PAVING PLAN CL1 LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL Al SITE PLAN A2 FLOOR PLAN A3 ELEVATIONS CONTACTS OWNER MOON MOTORSPORTS 3613 CHELSEA RD MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PH. 763.295.2920 CONTACT. JOEL ERICKSON GENERAL CONTRACTOR LARSON BUILDING, INC. 3 HIGHWAY 55 WEST BUFFALO, MN 55313 PH. 763.688.5430 CONTACT: ANDY LARSON ARCHITECT STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE 15001 140TH ST FORESTON, MN 56330 PH. 612.508.8099 CONTACT. ERIK JOHNSON CIVIL SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE SUITE 230 SARTELL, MN 56377 PH. 320.339.0669 CONTACT. BRIAN SCHULTZ STONETENT © 2016 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not I intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik @stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com LARSON BUILLIIIG No. I Date I Appr I Revision Notes No. I Date I Issue Notes I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Architect Erik P. Johnson Registration 50962 Date NOVEMBER 4, 2016 Project Title MOON MOTORSPORTS CITY SUBMISSION Project ID 1012 Sheet Title TITLE SHEET Sheet No. T1 SITE PLAN Scale: 1 " = 30 ft 7IONAL EXTERIOR STORAGE AREA (EXISTING 7,300 SQ FT) )ITIONAL EXTERIOR SALES AREA (EXISITING 7,300 SQ FT) ENDED SCREENED AREA FOR _ES IN FOR SERVICE (ALLOWED E AREA = 25% BUILDABLE AREA ON SITE FT (.25) = 51,116 SQ FT ALLOWED ,L PROPOSED = 10,450 SQ FT PARKING COUNT '7 EXISTING REQUIRED 80 EXISTING STALLS STALL LOST IN ADDING JEW HANDICAP STALL ) SF NEW SALES/ 200 = 20 75 SF NEW WAREHOUSE /500 = 8 STALLS NEW STALLS REQUIRED 35 PROVIDED �L 105 STALLS REQUIRED �L 114 STALLS PROVIDED / 1, STONETENT © 2016 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik @stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com L A F S O N BUILeDIIIG No. I Date I Appr I Revision Notes No. I Date I Issue Notes I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Architect Erik P. Johnson Registration 50962 Date NOVEMBER 4, 2016 Project Title MOON MOTORSPORTS CITY SUBMISSION Project ID 1012 Sheet Title SITE PLAN Sheet No. Al (D O O 0 O c0 CY) 0 0 19 m STONETENT © 2016 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik @stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com o� (D FLOOR PLAN Scale: 3/32" = 1' -0" O' o' O' o ' i O' o' No. I Date I Appr I Revision Notes No. I Date I Issue Notes I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Architect Erik P. Johnson Registration 50962 Date NOVEMBER 4, 2016 Project Title MOON MOTORSPORTS CITY SUBMISSION Project ID 1012 Sheet Title FLOOR PLAN Sheet No. A2 4 f -�; ]z I BAIRD ON o� (D FLOOR PLAN Scale: 3/32" = 1' -0" O' o' O' o ' i O' o' No. I Date I Appr I Revision Notes No. I Date I Issue Notes I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Architect Erik P. Johnson Registration 50962 Date NOVEMBER 4, 2016 Project Title MOON MOTORSPORTS CITY SUBMISSION Project ID 1012 Sheet Title FLOOR PLAN Sheet No. A2 All 1-1- -IA 1- rl rlr A� NORTHEAST ELEVATION Scale: 1/8" = 11 -011 VEL � 011 —� NORTHWEST ELEVATION Scale: 1/8" = 11 -011 &--� TOP OF EXISTING PARAPET NEW BEYOND SOUTHWEST ELEVATION Scale: 1/8" = 11 -011 EXISTING STONETENT © 2016 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik @stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com L F S N BUILL IN No. I Date I Appr I Revision Notes No. I Date I Issue Notes I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Architect Erik P. Johnson Registration 50962 Date NOVEMBER 4, 2016 Project Title MOON MOTORSPORTS CITY SUBMISSION Project ID 1012 Sheet Title ELEVATIONS Sheet No. A3 CER TIFICA TE OF SUR V Y ` \ 955.7 -- -Chain Link Fence LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED: X955.2 / 9563 Lot 1, Block 1, Otter Creek Crossing, Wright County, Minnesota. /� / / �'� / / `. A^i� 56.4. / O � +\ � (l\j `I•. NOTES: X 959 `/\ X.3 / _ 954.7 1 This survey performed erformed without the benefit of a title commitment. There may or may not be other easements encumbering or benefitting the 956.1 subject property. The legal description as shown hereon was obtained �+ from a Warranty Deed Document No. 940584 and 940585. / ,�% / // // //62.7 X962.a \`x96,.4 ®\ \ \+ X / / / 58� / Underground Electric J ` 2) Berlchmark: 953.7 / //955.7 / / 957.2/ / / / / / '361.3 `\ ; /' X / per Gopher One 962.4 Catch Basin - - - - -- x 963.3 RIM = 960.57 /' ` ..Edge of Planter \+ Top nut of fire hydrant located in the easterly parking lot of building #3613 / // / / / / / / /`'X2.6 { \ X INV sw. = 957.8 \ X961.2 \+ / ' / / X/ /DT 31N CLUSTER INV SE. - 957.7 Chelsea Road W. as shown hereon. / / / / /958. / I X961.6 60. + Elevation= 963.61 feet (NGVD 1988 datum) / /J62.9 /x \ 962.9 /,\ o / /uu'�' / /� / / / X/ 963.2 w` CT 81N / \` o1R \ +\ / co / , : "961.0 \�`� oc'rs X 3) Location of utilities existing on or serving the surveyed property as determined by / / 95 3,f� / /958 g / / / ,� / / , / 61.2 / 961.6 observed evidence and markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources x / / ,/� / X / / / / X963.2 / 961.1 (are shown hereon), subject to the following restrictions: 953.5 / / / / / s x963.0 CT 81N /� 12" HDPE \+ x 961.5 `\ , /�/ A. Utility operations do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher 9T 61N / / 963.0 \+ i;/ ,1 State One Call service for boundary purposes such as this. / / // r'r // / � / ' / /°� Q� Concrete Curb B. Those utility operators that do respond, often will not locate services from their main / / / / / / ' % /X951 �) \ 962.6 X9627 617 / 961.3 '\,\ <�4 \ + \+ line to the customers structure or facility - they consider those segments private / 1'•9/1955.6 / A8.2 x 961 Q x \+ ' / / ' / / X , 960.5 962.5 X961.6 \ ` 961.6 /4? \ installations that are outside their jurisdiction. If a private service to an adjoiner s side s 953.6 / /,/ Drainage and Utility Easement per plate / X Aj CT 61N crosses this site or a service to this site crosses an adjoiner, it may not be located x / /,/ / f�. / / " / 960.3 \� , \ X962.1 8 a �+ since most operators will not mark such "private" services. / /,' X / / / 960.7 9613 p p / / 957.6 / / / x _ I _ _ o .4 C. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES �'� / / / / / /- _X96,1-0- CT 61N �•9 � _'� - - - 961.4 \ \ \kt 003 \+ 961.0 PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW X953.4 %y ,'/ / / / / /060.1 / j s61�6 X 961.0 I 962.0 \ \ X961.5 �?p�s�+ TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALLAT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT / ,r'/ 5s.o // / // / / /sX 963.0 \ �\ 9612 xl / \ \zs o "0 +\ (651) 454 -0002. / ,/ / / x/ �`° / -�( x 961.9 ' - ' y 6\ JO, + 957.8 O / / \ 962.6 98 /'•, 962.4 962.6 dh X \+ / / 959.9 / 962.7 Gi 962.3 \ 961.0 • D. Lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, r / / l I / / \ X9617 / % 00,, °aA completely and reliably de depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is / / / / / X60.7 / X963.3 \ / °ter '9628 962.9 ���,6 \ \' a/ J \ p y y p ,/ / I / eS s \6 at + --Right of Access deeded to the State of Minnesota required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. g' / 963.2 I / / 4 a `\ ,' S ea \''' / / Edge of Woods f, 962.8 Oe r/ qr X961.5 + per Document No's. 242679, 266002, and 266001 / E. Per Gopher State One -Call Ticket No. 162772828 the following utilities and / ,/ / / x \ I \ \ x 63.3 qro 963.0 t61.9 / //, �rR�c �,6 - - - \amino` \ `e \\ p g / 961.0 r / / / 1 _ / X962.2 7rS - - S O / municipalities were notified: / r / 957.0`/ 958.4 I 96 9 1 \ \. 962.8 \ e 9X.7 /r / / J� // 962.2 X / / ' 963.1 \`\\ 963.2 n19 \ Ad \'960.9 °orR CITY OF MONTICELLO /FIBERNET (763) 314 -0113 / / , // / / / / / /X958.1 / / 959.9 \ \� - Z 6 / / 96 . /C' 28s ``,\ j>ah \X9sz.o 960.6 96 �s X961.5 \ + ,/ / \ 962.0 n J 963.3 `a'0d 963.1 \ , 7� CENTER POINT ENERGY (608) 223 -2014 �� / / 962.6 oS. >C \ \ \+ s \ / ,0c' X961.1 / Edge of Planter - - - - • ! % �` XCEL ENERGY (800) 848 -7558 // / / /X 958.2 / / /x960.2 \ \ \ AT &T TRANSMISSION (612) 344 -3327 953.7 / / / / / J 1 63 963.3��� d \ +\ X r / / / / / / / / /� ' 9 \ \960.2(Flow Line) \ +\ \� TDS TELECOM (763) 295 -2301 Xs52� £ ) / / / X59.6 / / / _ ;982 g; \ - - -- -Edge of Concrete \ \ �`� CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS (800) 778 -9140 FFE- 963.5 =' / �y X 962.5 / i `' \ \ 961.8 \ < / 6� X X S X953.2 !'/ / / / / / / / /X961.2 961.6 / x \ \ ` -04', Q " 960.3 r \ + NUSTAR PIPELINE OPERATING PART (316) 721 -7073 / 953.4 / / 954.9 / / / X ii 9 1.9 r / / / / Building Entrance Overhang - - -:- `\ \ 962.4 -,X g g ---- Catch6Basin \ + / / / / 982.9 6? IX Underground Electric ••• 6 \ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (651) 366 -5750 / / / / !%y �` \ per Gopher One / RIM = 960.11 \ +\ STATE OF MN OFFICE OF ET (320) 963 -2400 / / / / / / / / /x 960.2 / / 963.1 \ colic .a INV = 956.6 `\ 961.8 + TDS METROCOM (218) 821 -7672 / / �,/ / /��� / DT 111N ° / / �oQ r ,64eS4 a : \961.0 960.5 r / v 961.3 + X 0 961.9 x 963.0 -,� Oo Oe 962.9 0,6 \962.0 i 12" HDPE Storm Sewer 953.3 6/ / // / Vg/ / / X958.1 I l / / Storm Sewer Clean Out - - - -, �7 oor \ ` X ` \ 4) Area: 224607 SgFt 5.2 Acres /� . / / - _ J / %C 960.5 / 9 , / / / r gg2. per city plans ` \961.7 \ + � / / h� /' / / / / / 1 / x i t /S 62.7 �: " 961.2 \ I ` \ \ 961.6 \ +\ X952.. j , / / OU• f// / / / / / / _ / I / 962.3 963.1 286 \ \ 961.3 X96 X961.2 / 962.6 962.0 \ \ / / / /, 62.9 961.4 9X 6 960. v X961.7 \ `\.\ - - 61.7 + \+ 57.5 / / \ `\ 961.5 X / 6 963.0-, �% 961.5 61.6 / J / 862.0 861.2 \ 962 p `` \ +� - -Chain Link Fence 961.0 X / \ \ +� �/\ _ > x \ \ a I X---Moon Motors Sign / /- \ \\ / + / 963.2 F 963.1 962.0 \ 961.5 / �Pga:, ^� \ O X960.8 �+ 962.4 Q G , M \ I 962.0 \ 962.5 `e \ 1956 ,' / / / /' X / moo° _ ^ °; 962.9 \ X / / X� \ X 96\ + 961.7 / 964.3 \ - -- -Edge of Woods -7,9b / 963.4 X ti � \ � I / / x X \ \ X960.8 X X962.2 Oro ; O ; /(D i / ( 964.3 I 962.4\ O + \ 961.6 960.7 \ \ \ x / 961.8 963.2.7` ; Concrete Surface 961 1 i 961.8 / / / 963.2 \ /959.7/ / X i i 962.1 \ I x / 963.4 \ f " \ \ +. / x j i 09 982.9 / X963.1 \ a DT 31N CLUSTER / Q \ / 6'•: 62. 960.9 x ♦ 952.9 / / s�6 / / \ / i 963. 963.8 X 959.0 / / � � 961.9 I � I / / / � \ \ \ \\ I X 962.8 X� X ; (J / 964.8 Drainage and Utility Easement per plat- - - - - -' \� .� / ♦ ♦ / / / / \\ / 962.3 / 963.5 7C ; Flagpole - -- X 962.1 I > X / /X X 96 x 963.6 \\ / x / 962.0 l '---Edge of Planter / ° > - 961.4 / 3 3 / 963.6 / Q/ O� DT 61N r > I / X r 9 X 3 964.1 1 X 1 96X3.7 X g' \ "' Telephone Pedestal �♦ ,/ / / 959.8 / 966.4 / / / /'y ; 962.1 / 964.6 \ 95 9 %< / / / / \ / i o / ._- > 60.5 > ( X /- !1953.0 / / ,' i / / / `\ - i -9832 963.0 _� -> °� plans % t v - - - -- - -Storm Sewer Manhole •• -- Underground Electric / / / ` `\ / / ',G °� '' Storm Sewer Clean Out > -� C Storm $e`Ner Per aty P Edge of Concrete 1 N 60.4 RIM = 960.61 per Gopher One / 1 ,/ / \ ` ^ / / 659.8 / / / 963.5-, i > PV 962.5 \ / - - _/ ,r. / \ A � / // / 6 X / `, / . O� 1> 8„ g 2v � INV SW. = 956.5 � / X962.6 Guide Wire - -- \ / / Edge of Concrete `� / 1 -> °� / I INV NW. = 956.4 \ X ° / 961.8 / 960.1 \ 960.7/ / \ \ 963.3 / ° > / 962.2 1,1 � I 964.2 / / "�( , X \ Existin Buildin > _ 963.1 / ¢ m INV SE. = 956.3 X\ /- - - / 0/ 958.6 / X X 9 9 > >` / ® / 963.0 // X \ V / 960.3 / x \ 962.7 I x / i \ 52.0 962.0 / x / 962 7 \ #3613 Chelsea Road W. � 962.3 o I \ - � � / / / 961.1 - �r r 959.4 I f RT 61N C'1`61N 962.5 / "' Underground Electric - / X / // Wood Fence /. // 62.0 \ \ I X 962.1 / I per Gopher One ® / / / \ �_/ ,, / r / J / Y / �s : // Concrete Curb---,, X 961.7 � \ 961.3 / X960.3 / / / 963.0 X o> I 960.2 / X / 960.6 X ' / 963.0 / i % 2s 961.7 / m \ \ -96 / ,/ / / r / \ CT 61N _ X961.5 963.6 -,, - - o \ r 958 / / / x \ o' % / \ °�rO X960.7 X953.4 J / ,' / / / X/ O°'ro/ / // / 963.3 \ \\ / \ 961.8(Flow Line) 961.4 961.1/ ° I \ Q 9 X 2 /' x X / / / / `: �� 62.2 Z I 960.1 \ X961.3 _/ / r 72 x 958.2 / 959.6 / 0.0 �! 963.4 � / / , / / v / / 963.5 1 - - X960.7 ' X952.2 / r / / o' y X Bituminous Surface / / m I \ - - / ,/ /C;,5IN X96. w 10 v 962.0 / /960.0 ' ; / / / O / �o II 961.6 / / 960.2 i / Concrete Curb (8612) X960.6 / / /// /X959.9 / / / 62.1 / ,/ 958.2 / / r / G° 62.8 961.9 / 959.9 , / X959.2 / / % , / / / / / O Q 961.4 / 960.7 X X / 951.8 / / / ,/ / / / \ 962.4 / '-- -FFE =963.5 O 962.3 j / 1 -Paint Striping (typical) 959.7 / 959.2 / �CT 61NX � / / � Concrete Surface / x 962 8 CT 61N X\ 961.2 / �� i 959.9 r'r / �s� Underground Gas /% / ° d CT 61N 962.0 / / a t ; X960.3 / 958.0 / / Edge of , Q % •. � � per Gopher One / 963.4 62.6 ,/ / 963.0 X963.3 FFE = 963.5 - -, Concrete I ® eyaa\� X961.5 / o 1t. 959.7 X ,' / Jc 952.0 / / /, / / / / / 962.1 X \ CT 61N 962.5 g`a 951.0 \� / / 959.7 _ / / 62 8 .GAT 61 N \ / / 963.3 \ Ed e of Concrete t z - - / 959.4 963.0 ° 0 / 2 \ 53.7 / / 959.8 / \ \ w 963.4 \ g c° 961. / v _/ X / / 9,g / ,' / / / � / X/ \ `\ rn -963. e 961.7 "'959.0 / \ r / 1 x (r / / / / / / / ` `\ I / \ \ / , X962.8 962.5 c, `',r r / 950.5 / � \ / / / I / � \ �`�\ // :!�'• "Concrete Column (typical) 61.7' �� / l FFE =963.5 :` / / X \ / O CT 41N /X961.1 \ X \ / 63.4 J I / r 955.7 (n / / / \ ` %< / \ / 963.3 a ::.'.` �• %, / 52.2// r / \ X / / / / I _ A' \ \ 963.0 \ / aw;'963.2 963.1 62.4 { v '/ 959.3 / / 952.0 x r / / / X -,}NS �`\ \ i x C �� :963.1 / CT 61N� 960.3 / . ,' CT 61N X958.8 / X958.4 958.6 / / I \ 962.1 \ \ / 963.3 oncref p 963.4 9633 w I Benchmark --- 960.4 960.2 a v CT 41N `X ` \\ ��� Edge of Concrete e X \ I (See Note 2) �o •,959.8 , I 959.4 x C7 60.1 \ `� \ / 963.4 963.4 G° 962.7 v 959.3 957'9 \ \ CT 41N \ \ 962.9 Wood Fence / v / 1 X ' 950.9 / ,' /X954.3 / / / X / \\ \'' / 963.4 J� / 963.4 �: , j, /961.0 959.9 X / / / Edge of Woods-- =/ / / 1 960.5 \ X961.5 \\ x �y 63.3 7�0 63.4 �o / aQ5�0'i I ' / 960.5 959.1 / / ,' / v 962.7 ^� 0O / / 963.5 G / a� DT 81N 959.6 I r' 959.5 / X I / / 1 \ X `\ /' O`O i oc° / / .�a� CJ I / 960.5 I ,/ CT 81N X / / 0 \ r X963.0 59.4 I 959.0 ' , / 954.2 �(4 / / I \ 962.9 \�\ 953.0 /' \ \ / - \ Z rn r / / 61111 / )( \ - - 963.4 \ / / / / 952.5 / / ,' X 6/ / ' ( / / / 959.1 ' \ 961.7 \ CT 41N X963.0 \ ` / _ \ X 963.3 �\ /'A 963.2 / 963.0 eyyPe / II/ / 959.5 v �g5 /,, X959.1 953.5 / / / / \ \ \ 6 \ 963.3 Q �� GG / 1 59.4 i r X / / / / X960.2 \ \ / \\ A / 9 959. ,' Catch Basin \ X962.3 `\ \ 962.7 (Flow Line) o s 962.8 r GaQP / / / - 9-X 1 58.9 r' 5 / \ Building - -- ' �a� oa. / RIM = 958.58 '�C CT 41W Overhang ae �a / INV NW. = 954.8 X / O 958.9 \ CT 41N X /a0e Edge of 0` 1� INV SW. = 954.3 / ' / X / 962.7 \ - r / 959.4 / X \ � `\ � � ` Concrete ` °�° ,, / �c X961.7 � I'•' -•• „' / f 959.7 0;°/ r / 961.2 gs2\ \ CT 41N \ ` +\` t - \v 63.3 / 962.8 C� °cG 962.6 ' Q C/ /,, \ X � � ` \ . � � 959.2 / \ 963.2 \` \ 96 / \�`' f " C / , X Wood Fence - -_: \ +`\ 6�^ \ty puns rr / \ / / / / X \\\ (y 63.2 etc g / ,�r / / / / / X961.5 \ \ \ \ / J 962.6 �63.1� 962.6 J .T1 \ Ed e of Woods -= / / / / 961.9 \ X962.7 ;� / � / � eC p 959.0 \ / 9633 �� gej3 r / `\ 962.2 / i ttn r / / X963.a \ \� , -- Concrete Curb Storm Sewer Stub -•' / Concrete base for ;'� - % \/ (i NOP� ,r X / \ 95 / '/ / / / / 9591 / / \ �K per plans \Electric Transformer- / / ` g' �r 958.9 / �/ X961.1 I ; ` \ X CT41N \\ ` \ \\ P YP / v 62.4 `L 1 /X960.1 / " 962.5 \ d / 961.9 \a i / 959.6 / / I A x 963.3 \ / � � r x`\ / X / l/ ^ `�\\ , / \962.8 X S1 • \ \�Q `�.(. I x 950.8 / \ 952.8 ��`\ / / / / / / / / 961.7 X961.8 I I /�` �^ \ `\\ 962.4X !r X 62.3(Flow Line) ��/ etG C� �� ' r,r 9X2 ( ) / co ` \\ / / / / / // // // X961.1 / `` t` N \ X963.4 CT X96372\ `` \ +\ / / I Post Valve Indicator... \ 949.7 Flow Line \ /' / v / 0 i 954.4 / �/ / / / / /X961.2 i / ` / X962.7 \ \' \`• ° ° / I 962.3 62.2 L \ 13911 / \ qo' / / / / / i / r \ X %T41N \ �/- - L m / \� g0\Q �'(i / / / \ 951.8 1 `\ Storm Sewer Stub' \ \ X I \ / / 950.0 / 1 (X962.0 963.7 CT 41N \ \ / v 3 C 959.8 r X958.5 r / \ `�\ \ per city plans -..., ( / / 961.9 �( �/ / X962 2 \ \ 961.7 / - 6" Watermain per city plans - - -- / �� 1 �r / f / / DT 41N i r\ 660.0 \ \ X x Y \ % 963.0 / 962- 955.7 � "'961.3 ♦ / ,/ 962.0 X 1 \ `X959.1 \ 961.5 /� / /' X \ CT 41N { m �.. / r / \ r 1 ro ♦ 962.5 \ !i /959.0 / / CT 4IN / / / I x l _ 961. \ i X \ / / 962.1 , LOT 1 / 963.1 !y 6/ 951.2 \ \ 953.1 \ `\\ \ , ,•'j� - - - -j 'Storm Sewer Manhole 1 962.2 .,� � X X958.5 T41N / \'r\ r / g \ I \ \ 956.2 / �\ Sg57.7 C9 RIM = 956.39 \ 1 x / i L/ _ / �. I ,/ X INV SE.= 949.5 961.6 / e / � ! r\ 952.8 C\ \� �� r'' r X962.5 / 953.0 i (i G \ i 949.5 \ \ 954.1 INV NE. -SW. = 948.9 1 co r ^\ `� 959.7 \ M962.0 / O X' CT41N 62.2 / d C� I / /959.7 \ o \ r \ \ x \t \ \ L \ r \ \� X 1 \\ X 4°j / a 961.4 m / `� / r' roOX v / 1 ` \ r\ \ \ \ \ \X956.2 \ sg 1 \ X 962.6 / Underground Electric-, Q / (- 4 \ / I r °j / x \\ 961.6 / 962.5 / per Gopher One 962.6 / t Bituminous Surface \ r r 958.4 \ X 1i ( x / X / / 960.4 \ � r / DT 41N c`°n G \ / P. I \ \ \ X\ I Edge of Woods / 963.1 X / / a RIM Catch 961124' / L 961.7 �/ ' / / / / X958.4 \ I r\ r 954.1 X �` \ r 9 I 963.1 962.0 l X / 955.3 \ \ \ \ `960.7 S, 962.0 / X 2.7 / INV NW. = 954.2 962. L 961.3 Si o, \ \ r\ I \ \ L \ \\ r Underground Telephone \ ` _ 96 Qc 961.3 / X959.7 / INV NE. -S. = 953.5 / 5 r 953.0 / \ \ - -r _per Gopher One I / � \ \ I / \ �) ® r \ `S6, 62.6 / /�Q\a 961.8 - - -962 / 950.9 \ \ r\ r / / \ / ... Catch Basin \� `� \ r� \ \ \ \ / / X / / /,& / / Concrete Curb - - - -' RIM = 953.34 �`� \ \ %£96\ a L ° / \ 951.7 r\ L INV = 948.3® \ G ` \` �r\ \ � 962.1 / \ 962.8 / 963 1 / / 961.7 L�y�L 4 L / X961.8 �, / / X958.5 / \ Concrete Curb - - -- �� % 955.6 \ `\ X957.5 \ r \ ` \ \ X \ / / z S� / / r 950.0 / \ r L s� o d ` \ \ / 963.2 / X / / / g 61.2 961.7 i / , %E \ \ \ r\ I r L °` j \ \ \ \ \`\ \ \ r\ r\ \ \ X959.5 \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ _ / / ` J / Q / / °� L / X961.8 961.4 \ r I \ ' L /5� c�`' DT 41N \ `�\ \ r\ \ \ / / / / QQi / X \ r �l GQ Qua rotary Manhole ® \ `\ \g r \ \ \ X / X / ` ZO \ / / r / / X958.5 / \� RI = 954.32 ` S8 \ \ \ 962.6 962.6 18" HDPE - - -, / Drainage and Utility Easement per plat - - - -, rr / / L 954.5 C X `` \ r\ r \ \ \ \ X / a / / a 41 / / / 9b' \ \956.2 \ C \ r \ \ 963.2 / L 1 / X \ \ I \ 1 954.4 \ \ d `X\ X958.1 \\ \ \� \ \ / / ti / / I 961.6 \ r \ \ \ \ / / Q ro L \ / , - -- S bFrn Sewer Manhole / \ �` \` \ r\ r Underground Gas \ \ / / L/ X961.9 / ti X960.6 �'' 960.0 \ RIM X953.67 r / i �a \ \ 0� \\ \ t per Gopher One \ \ \ / ` 960.�61owr Line) / ,'', r\.\ / \;' r\ \ \ Underground Telephone--/---. / \ \ \ \ \ �`•� \ r\ \ \ \ 963.1 / / X961.3 X Qua S� per Gopher One \ Catch Basin 953.8 \ / G \ \ \ \� 5 r� \ \ \ \ \ X x / a Q 962.4 / / / L/ `G� \ RIM = 953.34••• =" \ DT 41N r 961.6 6 / / i \ r \957.0 oX \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ 963.0 / X / / i / L °`Qe X961.8 / % 950.7 60/,� x959.9 Q `_J` / X \ J /1 �` `�\ \� \ X \ \ 3� L .°�,/ / 958.6 / \ \ / ;' �dj6 \ G ` \\ N 78., \ \ \ 9ro / 961.2 / L/ / O� X46 40 �. �\ 'S'OA \ \ \ / / / X / / / O`�� / / i \ / 8� 0 dam\ r F \ \ \ L a 16 ..0 S \\ S4 \ \ \ / a L 0 / X DT 41N r / 956.2 \ 00 0 X� `\` �r \or7JS \ \ \ \ / Q /962.1 / '�,g6 L/ QJG 961.5 / ~ r' x959.7 / / 957.9\ G \ �`�\ \ r\ e�01- 967 `96? \ / / L/ / 960.6 (960.8 \ X958.9 r \ \ \ ♦`�C l 1 B�OIrC r GIi \\ \ `\\\ \ r \ci� \ \ \ \ .i / / ( X960.8 L/ /L X961.4 / X \ 960.3 \ \ 11 /lalyseh r Dl\41N \ \ G ` X960.5 D-\411\1 .5 \ \ \ \ �71� ' i2/ / J X960.6 // \ I e1p\ -\ Ge955.6 e/ X \ r \ Underground Electric �a X961.4 f �/ - \ 958.6 � \ a per Gopher One 5, , 61.0 / A L d \ X960.7 59 °y / )/� X960.0 r X 59.6 \ / 960.7 -'. / / \J� Ct ^/ DT 41N ,t � / ,r 959.2 / 1 N Telephone Pedestal X961.3 / XUtility Vault / / L / x960.6 ,r %/• / \ 1 r 957.5 '''� Catch Basin / X \ X \ r\ /Sntary Manhol / 961.3 957.6 \ 959.1 \ M = 958.74 / \ F , L = 959.19 \ \ 1 x r INV��E. = 952.0 INV = 947.5 960.7 / /� � \INV N. W. 951.7 - -, X / X j 1 1'X960.1 959.4 062.2 r \ \ ��.\ \ 959.5 \ . �`\ r r / ` / x961.5 DT41N x - - - -- Catch Basin 961.1 / ' \ `f / \ 957.1 f ; r /,1 \ \ � RIM = 959.05 960.4 `\ r INV = 954.4 / 961.2 / /' X960.2 LEGEND \ \ 958.3 X959.6 9589 \ r Concrete Base DT 161N 72 / \ -- Underground Telephone , per Gopher One \ / filer i O 960.1 �L/ x / r' 960",- / \ 1 aigp ` \\ X �l 961.5 961.1 0 20 • Found Iron Monument \ r }� / Tele hone Pedestal ® Gas Meter \ \ 1 \ el0ily 958.6 959 0 59.2 \�/ -Moon Motors Sign X / ,/ x960.4 ' X959 9 / m Water Gate Valve \ \ \ 1 r t� \ 960.0 / \� 961.2 Power Pole \ \ 958.0 \ 958.8 01,64 G/ \-X, x \ 960.0 / Co 961.4 ( r \ x \ r _ e ^`t \ \`�FiberOpticHandHole... 1X960.8 \ / © Electric Meter \ \ \ - - - - _ 6590 �"� \ x961.3`\ r \ / Traffic Sign \ \ \ 696 w 959. 95 . \ \96��/ \\` sXz /r''� °�e I X960-3 X 610 \ N / \ / O Guard Post ® Irrigation Cover \ \ \ 4 \ \ 958.6 � X :.��' i �_ :. i \ ,\ � /��/ \ 959.2 959.8 \ 49 3 G x \ \ ' \ --- Sanitary Manhole 959.8 ® 960.6 / 0 Light Pole \ \ RIM = 959.33 / { \ -b- Fire Hydrant \ \\ \ �\ 959.6 JDT41fX�` \ \ \\ ❑ Catch Basin \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 959 3 9598 1 11 `X960.1 \ \ \\\ Underground Fiber Optic \ / X Spot Elevation \ \ \ \ \GG O per Gopher One \/ \ 959.0 \ / ® Sanitary Clean Out \ \ \ ® Outdoor Light \ \ Conifer Tree and Size \ \ \ \ } Deciduous Tree and Size \ \ 9592 \ o Set Iron Monument #41226 \ \ \ \ \ O cO / \� 959.4 �Q A .... Overhead Utility Line (typical) X959.8 959.4 (Flow Line) O r CO r W Z U 3 !Y W W Z U 0 � a of Y U) U W a3 Q U U) Z 0 U) W 00 ILL! � o E o p Z cn a N M m J.; m 3: CW L a O 'O 0 0_.T o L L Q O ate+ o > 0 O Q a) N -6 c Cd i > (6 O U) " -, a) U) � -, C � (n _r_ a �O M i U O J N (O -0 N M W >a U fl (6 a) O W Z N rn N m u3 a)m_o ` Q U) O M C O L U Z _0 V O U Ld n0 0- Z W_ rJ V 7S 4- 0 LLI W U) bJJ ct � ° O U rn r� C O ��o 0 Q O bA a O l.-4 U M ~ M 7� O m tf) O � Cn ct I, M LU H V/ V) W ` 00 Ln W M W 1.17 LL U) � z V) z �„� O . � MYM 1-4 X J 1 ob 0 m W 00 J 1 OC;Q"D Nd2:l-, U r1i rn.a a W w� 1 -40 po- t MOON MOTORSPORTS SITE SUMMARY PARCEL SIZE 224,607 SQ FT / 5.2 ACRES GROSS FLOOR AREA TOTAL 32.723 SQ FT - EXISTING 24, 493 SQ FT -NEW 8,230 SQ FT IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 57% PROJECTED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 30+/- REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 28 STALLS PROVIDED PARKING SPACES 35 STALLS + 1 CONVERTED H.C. PARKING STALL /AISLE DIMENISONS 9'W X 20'D / 30' AISLE (SEMI Access) EXISTING ZONING B4 (to convert to 133) -NO ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR STORAGE AREA (EXISTING 7,300 SQ FT) -NO ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR SALES AREA (EXISITING 7,300 SQ FT) - EXPANDED SCREENED AREA FOR VEHICLES IN FOR SERVICE (ALLOWED SERVICE VEHICLE AREA = 25% BUILDABLE AREA ON SITE 2049465 SQ FT (.25) = 51,116 SQ FT ALLOWED TOTAL PROPOSED = 10,450 SQ FT STONETENT © 2016 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik @stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com LARSON B U I L D I N G No. I Date I Appr I Revision Notes PARKING COUNT 77 EXISTING REQUIRED No. Date Issue Notes 80 EXISTING STALLS I hereby certify that this plan, 1 STALL LOST IN ADDING specification, or report was prepared NEW HANDICAP STALL that by or under direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 3,930 SF NEW SALES/ 200 = 20 Signature 3,975 SF NEW WAREHOUSE /500 = 8 STALLS Architect 28 NEW STALLS REQUIRED Erik P. Johnson 35 PROVIDED Registration 50962 TOTAL 105 STALLS REQUIRED Date NOVEMBER 18, 2016 TOTAL 114 STALLS PROVIDED Project Title MOON MOTORSPORTS CITY SUBMISSION Project ID 1012 Sheet Title SITE PLAN SITE PLAN Sheet No. Scale. 1 — 30 ft _A1 IN C, Ll 11 Z�e �0-0 I 1 11 1 1 1 E E 111 _- ).0 .6 117 12.6 2.8 13.8 12.3 12.1 11.0 10.5 •, Aj 12.7 3.6 13.6 12.8 12.0 11.6 10.9 -m -��- ��j�® ,moo ,,•.,. �� 1 . 13.4 3.3 12. E E: 11.4 11.8 11.6 (DASHED) 1.2 13.1 14.2 4.3 12. 11.7 11.5 11.9 t.9 12.5 13.8 3.7 12. 11.8 11.8 12.4 12.5 6 o ewneua a smmne • 6 AA . b.4 2.8 12.8 X3.7 12.6 11.8 11.8 12.1 ± FU7 E E IRL® 1.6 13.1 14.5 13.7 12.0 11.5 11.4 11.8 11. 1.9 12.8 14.0 13.3 12.1 11.3 11.2 11.4 11. 1.4 12.0 12.3 12.4 12.2 11.3 10.9 10.7 10. -mom• LI b. 7 11.1 11.4 11.6 11.5 11.1 10.7 10.5 10. C ASMNO FEHC O D. 58AFrA A ARA.0 7, k 0 8 10.7 10.5 10. NEW RODLGWALK M27NG PEMCMD 5 10.6 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.7 10.5 10.4 a CURB AREA = 5,400 SQ F7 7 10.9 + +.2 11.2 11.0 10.8 10.7 10. VEHICLES IN FOR SEIIRVC F + • + .8 • + . 4 0. 0. 1.0 . 1.1 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.2 2.1 11.7 1.3 11.0 10.8 0.6 10.5 1 2.0 2.2_2.4 2.2 11 5 4 11.0 11.1 11.4 11.9 12.6NATC�GAU(n] CAL4 13.7 12.7 11.9 11.3 10.9 10.6 12.9 14.0 13.2 12.1 + 1 Tq E�SPVU VEA F..PR S V0G;VE�Gt ll + + + + + +2 0 5 1.2 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.8 4.0 R�0��5.� 5.1 4.0 2.8 1.9 1.4 1.0 0.9j 13.4 14.5 13.6 12.0 +1 9 BB ROCK + + + + 4. .8 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.5 3.8 5 5.3 t.3 5.1 4.5 3.8 2.5 1.7 1.2 1.0 2.7 2.9 3.8 2.5 12. .3 URAIL + 2 9 112.7 X1`'-.9 13.8 12.5 p � � + . .3 + + + + + t '"+` t + + t + 1. .0 1.6 .5 .9 2.7 3.8 4.3 5.2 8. 6.3 4.7 .4 .4 2.3 1.5 0.9 1. + 11.9 13.4 14.3 13.7 12.0 +. .8 t t t t t t t t t t +1. 0. .7 1.3 .3 .5 2.0 12.6 3.8 5.0 5. 5. 4.8 .5 .3 1.7 1.2 0.8 1 + 12.2 13.0 14.2 13.3 12. - .6 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t 1.++$ 1.2 1.2 1.5 2.0 2.7 3.7 4.8 5.5 5.3 4.6 3.4 2.5 1.7 1.1 0.9 .9 12.5 12.7 12 1 NIEW 65 SUALLS + + + + 3. A + t .7 + 1.4 1.3 1.3 1 1.9 2.7 6 +4.0 116 + + + 3.0 2.4 +1-.&- + + + _ 1.5 1.2 1.0 +0.9 11.2 11.0, T -,.11 .0 / / 11.8 11.9 12.1 11.7 11.3 11.5 11.9 12.4 12.4 12.1 11.7 11.4 11.7 12.0 11.7 �a� I N FEW +1. 11 8 1 .5 .4 3.3 15.2 15.4 14.2 14. 15. +54 +1.2 .3 2.3 11.6 GIERWE rlloo\\7 10. +09 11.3 .8 2.4 13.7 14.4 15.9 15. 14. +37 1 .4 .7 1.2 10.7 i 0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 " = 30' -019 00 U1 �p In CIMARRON Cat.# Symbol LED Job Min Type Avg /Min COURTYARD + 12.3 fc SPECIFICATIONS 0.5 fc Construction: • LED drivers have output power over- • Stylish vertically finned die -cast solid top voftage, over - current protection and short housing for maximum heat dissipation; circuit protection with auto recovery Stops collection of unsightly debris from 15.0:1 gathering on top of the housing • 1050 mA driver available with 90L con- figuration for increased lumen output •Rugged lower die -cast aluminum heat 2.3 fc sink accelerates thermal management and optimizes PCB and optical perfor- • LED electrical assembly, including PR devices, consumes no power in mance the 'off' state • Separate optical and electrical complaint- • Surge protection - 20KA; Turns fixture off In for optimum component operation at end of life; Includes LED for end of life 0.7 fc indication (see surge suppressor page 4) • One piece die cut silicone gasket ensures each PARKING LOT weather proof seal around Controls: individual LED for IP65 rating • Drivers are 0 -10V dimming standard. 11.6:1 Photocell, occupancy sensor and wireless • Backlight Control (BC) option available for controls available for complete on /off 85% spill light reduction, doesn't change and dimming control fixture appearance or EPA, recommended N/A for Type III and Type IV distributions Lumen maintenance: + • L90 at 60,000 hours (Projected per IESNA • Stamped bezel provides mechanical TM- 21 -11) compression to seal the optical assembly 1 2.3:1 Installation: • Complements the Hubbell Southwest Two die -cast aluminum arm designs: The series of outdoor fixtures decorative arm offers a sleek upswept look • Weight - 45.0 pounds, EPA -1.3 fill while the straight arm follows the housing's contoured litres for continuity of style • Suitable for applications requiring 3G • Fixture ships with arm installed for ease of testing prescribed by ANSI 0136.31 installation and mounts to #2 drill pattern Optics: • Wall bracket, mast arm fitter and pole • Choice of 72 high brightness LED configu- accessories are also available rations with individual acrylic lenses allowing easy mounting for virtually specially designed for IES Type II, III, IV and any application V distributions BC.IES Finish: • Auto optics designed for front row 1A and interior 2A distribution o TGIC thermoset polyester ppowder paint finish 2.5 thickness rows (see under ordering and page 2) applied at nominal mil 1 Warranty: • CCT: 3000K 80 CRI , 4000K (70 CRI), Five year limited warran (for more intor- 5000K (/O C I), an turtle friendly Amber LED options mation visit: / om/ resource arranty/ Electrical: Listings: • Universal input voltage 120 -277 VAC, • Listed to UL1598 and CSA C22.2 #250.0- 50/60 Hz 24 for wet locations • Integral step -down transformer for 347V • Models meet DesignLights Consor- & 480V tium (DEC) qualifications, consult DEC website for more details: • Ambient operating temperature - 40 °Cto40 °C htto: //www.desimnliohts.orc /QPL • Automatic thermal self- protection • IDA approved • IP65 • Drivers have greater than 90% power factor and less than 10% TH D •Optional continuous dimming to 10% or Spaulding dual circuitry available TYPE 2 LENS WITH BACK SHIELDS CERTIFICATIONS /LISTINGS sAa. Irghtmg 1 C us factsn N•9a .aoaol<s„c wsrmsr ccT, o,ny I G H �olN� L L G H T N G PRODUCT IMAGE(S) �l 90 LED 3/4 VIEW 30 LED 1P Loi 60 LED 90 LED DIMENSIONS Upswept Arm r G � I _L F Straight Arm r E A D L J C� A B c D E F G 61 .. 21 3/4" 16" 6 5/8" 6 5116" 55/81, 61/8" 171mm 552mm 406mm 168mm 160mm 143mm 155mm ORDERING INFORMATION SEE NEXT PAGE SFMRULOING Spaulding Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864 - 678 -1000 ® HUBBELL L I G H T I N G Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without Force. Ughting ®2016 SPAULDING UGHTING, All Rights Reserved -For more information visit am website: www winklingllghOng.com - Prirdedin USACLILED- SPECar16 cat.# HUBBELL ®HUBBELL LNC SERIES Job Type Outdoor Lighting Approvals L� SPECIFICATIONS PRODUCT IMAGE(S) Intended Use: Lenses: ;",°o The compact LED LNC is designed forentry/pe- Full cut -off distribution, Ambient diffuser included .. unnaler Illumination for safety, security and Identity. use for applications near entemnces or locations Typical mounting height is up to 12 feet with 40ft where reduced brightness is desired. fixhlre spacing (without acrylic diffuser) and 30ft spacing with acrylic diffuser installed. Phatocontral Installation: option is available to provide dusk -to -dawn control Quick mount adapter provides quick installation, LNC -5L LNC -7L for additional energy savings designed for recessed box 4" square junction box. Construction: Listings: Decorative die -cast aluminum housing and door. Listed and labeled to UL 1598 for wet locations, Rugged design protects internal components and 25 C amhient environments. Some models meet provides excellent thermal management for long DesignUghts Consortium (DLC)qualifications, life- 60,000 hours minimum LED life at LOG rating consult DLC website for more details. 0 per IESNATNI- 21 -11. Powder paint finishes provide htto) /www.designliahts.oroJOPL LNC -9L With diffuser lasting appearance in outdoor environments. •IES Progress Award Winner -2012 DIMENSIONS Optics /Electrical � LED: Warranty: A Drivers are 120 -277V 50 /60Hz Type II, III and Type IV Five year limited warranty (for more information lenses provide wide lateral spread visit: http:// www .hubbelloutdooi.conlhesources/ 0-10Udimming120- 277Vonly warran / D • WC5L -5 LEDs, Types 11, III or IV available d , see page 2 for electrical details • LNC7L- 7 LEDs ,Type 1I,IIIorIV available .. r see page 2 for electrical details A B C D • LNC9L -9 LEDs, Types II, III or IV available, q,gp' 1.55" 8.22" 5.25" see page 2 for electrical details • 2000K - 80 CRI, 4000K - 70 CRI, and 5000K - (122 mm) (39 mm) (209 mm) (133 mm) 70 CRI, CCT nominal • Minimum operating temperature is -40 C,140F SHIPPING INFORMATION • Drivers have greater than .90 power factor and less than 20% Total Harmonic Distortion CERTIFICATIONS/LISTINGS LNC -5LU 9 e r4ab 14 5137) 9 e z4 5, 6 8 17 51 2 lighting LNC -9LU 9.814.36 145137) 9.6245, 68 -175) 2 SA� facts 1btla LNC -gLU 9.814.36 45197) 9.8245, 6.8175) C us „,,,,,,, -a000l<��a wom,erccr onry ORDERING INFORMATION ORDERING EXAMPLE: LNC- 9LU- 5K- 3 -1 -PC1 C - - • l r a � r 1 r r LNC LNC 5U 5 LEDs U 120V -277V 3K 3000K nominal, 2 Type II 1 Bronze PC(Xy Button photocontrol, zero uplight 71a 7 LEDs 1 120V 70 CRI 2 Black replace X with voltage, 9U 9 LEDs 2 208V 4K 4000K nominal, 3o Type III specify 1 -1201 2 -208V, 3 Gray 3 -24OV, 4 -277V 3 2401 70 CRI a 4 Type IV 4 Whit 4 277V 5K1 5000K nominal 5 Platinum AM2 Amber (590 pm available for "Turtle Friendly " / observatory appli- rations.350 mA (consult factory) 1 Pdhen PC is ordered, input must match PC voltage 2 Arl LEDs only avallahle on 7LU and 9W configurations , MD mA only 3 DesignHghts Consordum (DLC) qualified , l7 /9 models SK only: LPIC- 9LU -5K -4, LNC- 9LU ,K -R. IJNIC -7LU 5K -4, WC 7LU 5K-3. LNC- 5LU -5K PPR"M' HUBBELL Hubbell Outdoor Lightiny • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864 - 678 -1000 Outdoor Lighting Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subjectto change without notice. so 2016 HUBBELL OUTDOOR UGHTING, All Rights Reserved-For mere information visit ourwebsite: www.hubbelloutdooccom - Pdntedin USA LAREDOLNC -SPEC a/16 STEIEN ENGINEERING INC. 763 -585 -6742 763 -585 -6757 fax Email: Steen@ steeneng -corn 5430 Douglas Drive North Crystal, MN 55429 CIMARRON b" Type pj sPnut -�INIC LED CL1 S Approvals SPECIFICATIONS PRODUCT IMAGE(S) Construction: Installation: • Stylish vertically finned die -cast solid top • Quick -mount plate included for easy housing for maximum heat dissipation; installation Stops collection of unsightly debris - • The decorative integral arm houses two KL:,� S� t• �t,,: • Rugged lower die -cast aluminum heat sink stage hinge mechanism optimizes thermal management and °+ : ^' f =• optical performance • Safety latch holds luminaire door to prevent • One piece die -cut silicone gasket with "free swing" mechanically compressed stainless steel • Quick- connect wiring for simplified, hassle - bezel ensures weather proof seal around free installation each individual LED for IP65 rating •Suitable for applications re wiring 3G • Backlight Control (BC) option available for testing prescribed by ANSI 136.31 ""' spill light reduction, doesn't chainge fixture ap earance or EPA, recommended -�. p \� for Type Wand Type IV distributions Finish: • TGIC thermoset polyester ppowder paint • Complements the Cimarron LED CL1 i finish applied at nominal 2.5 mil thickness 48 LED 3/4 VIEW • Weight -19 pounds, EPA - .45 ft' Warranty: Five year limited warranty, for more Ir Optics: information visit: httm•�///�w� o oor. • Choice of 126 high brightness LED cam /resources an� configurations with individual acrylic lenses specially designed for IES Type II, III, IV and Listings: V distributions •Listed to UL1598 and CSA C22.2 #250.0 -24 for wet locations • 3000K, 80 CRI; 400DIl 70 CRI; 5000K, 67 CRI, Turtle friendly Amber • 700mA models meet DesignLights Consortium (DLC) qualifications, consult Electrical: DEC website for more details: 16 LED • Universal input voltage 120 -277 VAC, 50/60 htto: //www.designliohts.oro /QPL Hz * + •Ambient operating temperature -40'C to • IDA approved 40° C • IP66 • Drivers have greater than 90% power factor • IES Progress Award Winner- 2013 Mr. and less than 10` %THD 32 LED • 700mA drive current standard, 350mA and 525mA options available with 32L and 48L LED models • LED drivers have output power over - voltage, over- current protection and short circuit protection with auto recovery 48 LED • Surge protection - 20KA; Turns fixture off at end of life; Includes LED for end of life indication (see surge suppressor page 3) DIMENSIONS r- A PA • Nional 0 -10VDC continuous dimming to • Automatic thermal self - protection B • LED electrical assembly, includingg PR devices, consumes no power in tha'off' state Controls: • Drivers are 0 -1 OV dimming standard. u F e 4 Photocell and occupancy sensors available for complete on /off and dimming control 8191..1 lgbs. L g G 8.62 kill. E CERTIFICATIONS /LISTINGS a A B c D E F G H 05mm 414mm 102mm 114mm 76mm 515mm 105mm 143m5m c us facts SFMRUL 31NG Spaulding Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864- 678 -1000 =® HUB13ELL L r G H T r N G Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are SL bject to change without notice. Lighting ®2016 SPAULDING LIGHTING, All Rights Reserved• For more information visit our website: www.spauldingllghang.com • Printed in USA CL/S -SPEC 8/16 Statistics Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg /Min COURTYARD + 12.3 fc 4.3 fc 0.5 fc 8.6:1 4.6:1 EXIST FENCED 7300 + 1.5 fc 4.5 fc 0.3 fc 15.0:1 5.0:1 NEW FENCED 5400 + 2.3 fc 6.3 fc 0.5 fc 12.6:1 4.6:1 NEW TRUCK BACKING + 2.6 fc 4.5 fc 0.7 fc 6.4:1 3.7:1 PARKING LOT + 2.7 fc 8.1 fc 0.7 fc 11.6:1 3.9:1 PROPERTY LINE + 0.0 fc 0.0 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A SIDEWALK + 1.4 fc 2.0 fc 0.6 fc 3.3:1 1 2.3:1 Schedule Symbol Label Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number Description Lamp Number Filename Lumens Per Light Loss Factor Wattage Mounting Lamps Lamp Height 1 Spaulding CL1- 90L- 4K -2 -BC CIMARRON CL1 90 LEDs - 4000K - 70 CRI 1 CL1- 90L -4K -2- 16253 0.9 205 22,5• AA BC.ies 2 Spaulding CL1- 90L- 4K -4 -BC CIMARRON CL1 90 LEDs - 4000K - 70 CRI 1 CL1- 90L -4K -4- 18195 0.9 205 22.5' AA1 BC.IES AA2 1 Spaulding CL1- 90L -4K -3 CIMARRON CL1 90 LEDs - 4000K - 70 CRI 1 CL1- 90L- 4K -3.IES 22028 0.9 410 22.5• LJ1 Spaulding CL1S- 16LU- 4K -2 -BC TYPE 2 LENS WITH BACK SHIELDS 1 CL1S- 16LU -4K -2- 2031 0.9 114.2 15' o BB BC.ies 4 Hubbell Outdoor LNC- 9LU-4K-4 LNC, 9 LED, 4000K, TYPE 4 9- NICHIA 4K LEDS 1 LNC - 9LU- 4K -4.ies 2056 0.9 22.2 12' EE STONE TENT © 2016 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik @stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com I 0=11 CARSON BUILF?ING No. I Date I Appr I Revision Notes I No. I Date I Issue Notes I I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Engineer Steven M. Youngs Registration 16544 Date NOVEMBER 17, 2016 Project Title MOON MOTORSPORTS CITY SUBMISSION Project ID STA201601 Sheet Title SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Sheet No. STORM WATER CALCULATIONS MOON MOTORSPORTS 2016 BUILDING ADDITION MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA PROJECT NUMBER: 16057 Ph: (320) 339 -0669 REVISIONS ( HULTZ ENGINEEPING Fx: (866) 633 -1830 SITE DESIGN NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 18 South Riverside Ave, Suite 230 schultzeng @live.com Sartell, MN 56377 www .schultzengineeringdesign.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Brian J. Schultz DATE: 11/14/2016 REG. NO.: 43129 STORM WATER SUMMARY The proposed site is designed so that the majority of the storm water run -off drains to one of two proposed infiltration basins via new storm sewer and surface drainage to be constructed on -site. The infiltration basins have been sized such that the post - developed runoff for the 2, 10, and 100 -year storm events do not exceed the pre - developed runoff rates, per direction from the City Engineer. It should be noted that the proposed new and redeveloped impervious surfacing associated with this project is less than 1 acre. While infiltration basins are proposed for this project, engineering design related to water quality has not been included in the basin designs. The infiltration basins are included in this project for the purposes of controlling the 2 -year post - developed runoff rate. The site drainage has been modeled for 2, 10, and 100 -year storm events. Our calculations assume that a typical 2 -year storm event in this area of Monticello would be approximately 2.84 inches, a typical 10 -year event would be 4.22 inches and a typical 100 -year event would be 6.87 inches, as per NOAA Atlas 14 Rainfall Data. We have utilized HydroCAD software to generate hydraulic calculations, as shown on the following pages. The storm sewer pipe has been sized to carry runoff from the 10 -year storm event, and calculations for this have been completed using the Rational Method. Calculations are shown on the following pages. Existing Soils Based on the NRCS Web Soil Survey, as well as previous experience in this area of Monticello, the surficial soils at the site consist predominantly of topsoil consisting of silty sands (SM) or poorly - graded sands with silt (SP -SM) (Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) "B "). It should be noted that soil borings have been ordered for this project to verify underlying soils conditions, but were unavailable at the time of design. Ground Water Based on the NRCS Web Soil Survey, as well as previous experience in this area of Monticello, ground water is expected to exist at elevations below at least 947.0. It should be noted that soil borings have been ordered for this project to verify ground water conditions, but were unavailable at the time of design. Existing Drainage The proposed construction area consists of one existing drainage area (EXIST), which comprises the portion of the site designated for construction. This drainage area drains directly off site to the south and west. This drainage area has the following calculated runoffs from 2, 10 and 100 -year storm events: EXISTING DRAINAGE Drainage Area 2 -Year Runoff (cfs) 10 -Year Runoff (cfs) 100 -Year Runoff (cfs) EXIST 0.88 2.77 7.52 Proposed Drainage The proposed site consists of three drainage areas (DA). DA1 and DA2 contain most of the proposed impervious surfacing and each drain to a proposed infiltration basin. DA3 consists mostly of proposed green area (with some impervious area), and drains directly off site to the south and west, as the existing site currently does. The proposed drainage areas have the following calculated runoffs from 2, 10 and 100 - year storm events: PROPOSED DRAINAGE Drainage Area 2 -Year Runoff cfs 10 -Year Runoff cfs 100 -Year Runoff cfs DA1 3.00 4.96 8.69 DA2 1.03 2.19 4.66 DA3 0.68 1.93 4.91 The proposed outlets for the infiltration basins consist of combination orifice /weir outlet structures, which have been sized to limit post - developed runoff to pre - developed runoff rates. Data relating to the performance of the basin during the 2, 10, and 100 -year storm event is shown in the table below: INFILTRATION BASIN #1 DATA Bottom of Basin 954.50 Basin Outlet 956.50 Top of Basin 959.00 2-year Peak Water Level 956.87 2-year Peak Ouff low cfs 0.19 10-year Peak Water Level 957.67 10- ear Peak Ouff low cfs 0.42 100- ear Peak Water Level 958.69 10 -year Peak Ouff low (cfs ) 1.56 INFILTRATION BASIN #2 DATA Bottom of Basin 950.00 Basin Outlet 951.50 Top of Basin 954.00 2 -year Peak Water Level 951.68 2-year Peak Ouff low cfs 0.08 10-year Peak Water Level 952.37 10- ear Peak Ouff low cfs 0.35 100- ear Peak Water Level 953.66 10 -year Peak Ouff low (cfs) 0.59 RUNOFF RATE COMPARISON (Discharge Off Site Storm Event Existing Runoff EXIST Proposed Runoff Basin #1 & #2 Discharges + DA3 2 -Year 0.88 0.95 10 -Year 2.77 2.70 100 -Year 7.52 7.06 PROPOSED DRAINAGE - STORM SEWER DESi�N STORM SEWER DESIGN PROJECT NAME:Moon Motorsports Bldg Addition NOTE: Pipe lengths are from center of YEAR STORM: 10 DATE: 11/14/2016 PROJECT LOCATION: Monticello, MN structure to center of structure I DESIGN BY: BJS MANNING'S "N" 0.013 CHECKED BY: BJS Structure Number From To Station Offset to Center Length Area Area Area Total Tc to Time " I " Runoff Slope Pipe Capacity Veloci Upper Invert Sump Elevation Lower Invert Upper Casting Lower Casting Build Upper Cover Lower Cover Structure Dimension PIPE CLASS NOTES Feet Acres "C" x "C" C x A Inlet in Pie in/hr (cfs) % Dia. In. Q (cfs) V (f s) CB1 CB2 98 0.25 98 0.25 0.25 10.00 0.27 5.8 1.42 1.84 12 4.83 6.15 957.15 955.35 961.15 959.35 4.00 3.00 3.00 48" V CB2 FES 28 0.51 91 0.46 0.71 10.00 0.06 5.8 4.11 3.04 12 6.21 7.91 955.35 95235 954.50 959.35 N/A 4.00 3.00 48" V RD CB3 200 0.19 98 0.19 0.19 10.00 0.96 5.8 1.08 1.00 8 1.21 3.46 952.50 950.50 N/A 954.50 N/A N/A 3.33 48" V 46 0.25 77 0.19 0.38 10.00 0.16 5.8 2.20 1.09 12 3.72 4.73 950.50 947.50 950.00 954.50 N/A 4.00 3.00 1 48" V PFES Printed: 9:43 AM, 11/14/2016 Page 1 of 1 M: \01272 -03 \Excel \Hoglund BE SS_20140818 EXISTING DRAINAGE PROPOSED DRAINAGE - INFILTRATION BASIN DESIGN EXIST Subcat Reach Pon Link 2 -Year Existing Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment- numbers) 1.560 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (EXIST) 0.300 98 Paved parking, HSG B (EXIST) 0.410 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B (EXIST) 2.270 66 TOTAL AREA 2 -Year Existing Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 2.270 HSG B EXIST 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 2.270 TOTAL AREA 2 -Year Existing Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Printed 11/14/2016 Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG -A HSG -B HSG -C HSG -D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 1.560 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.560 >75% Grass cover, Good EXIST 0.000 0.300 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.300 Paved parking EXIST 0.000 0.410 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.410 Woods, Fair EXIST 0.000 2.270 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.270 TOTAL AREA 2 -Year Existing MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span =5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt =0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment EXIST: Runoff Area =2.270 ac 13.22% Impervious Runoff Depth >0.43" Flow Length =230' Slope= 0.0440 T Tc =21.5 min CN =66 Runoff =0.88 cfs 0.082 of Total Runoff Area = 2.270 ac Runoff Volume = 0.082 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.43" 86.78% Pervious = 1.970 ac 13.22% Impervious = 0.300 ac 2 -Year Existing MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment EXIST: Runoff = 0.88 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 0.082 af, Depth> 0.43" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 2.84" Area (ac) CN Descri 0.300 98 Paved parking, HSG B 1.560 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.410 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B 2.270 66 Weighted Average 1.970 86.78% Pervious Area 0.300 13.22% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 21.5 230 0.0440 0.18 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.84" EXIST Subcat Reach Pon Link 10 -Year Existing Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment- numbers) 1.560 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (EXIST) 0.300 98 Paved parking, HSG B (EXIST) 0.410 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B (EXIST) 2.270 66 TOTAL AREA 10 -Year Existing Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 2.270 HSG B EXIST 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 2.270 TOTAL AREA 10 -Year Existing Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Printed 11/14/2016 Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG -A HSG -B HSG -C HSG -D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 1.560 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.560 >75% Grass cover, Good EXIST 0.000 0.300 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.300 Paved parking EXIST 0.000 0.410 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.410 Woods, Fair EXIST 0.000 2.270 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.270 TOTAL AREA 10 -Year Existing MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span =5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt =0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment EXIST: Runoff Area =2.270 ac 13.22% Impervious Runoff Depth >1.14" Flow Length =230' Slope= 0.0440 '/' Tc =21.5 min CN =66 Runoff =2.77 cfs 0.216 of Total Runoff Area = 2.270 ac Runoff Volume = 0.216 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.14" 86.78% Pervious = 1.970 ac 13.22% Impervious = 0.300 ac 10 -Year Existing MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment EXIST: Runoff = 2.77 cfs @ 12.34 hrs, Volume= 0.216 af, Depth> 1.14" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 4.22" Area (ac) CN Descri 0.300 98 Paved parking, HSG B 1.560 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.410 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B 2.270 66 Weighted Average 1.970 86.78% Pervious Area 0.300 13.22% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 21.5 230 0.0440 0.18 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.84" EXIST Subcat Reach Pon Link 100 -Year Existing Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment- numbers) 1.560 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (EXIST) 0.300 98 Paved parking, HSG B (EXIST) 0.410 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B (EXIST) 2.270 66 TOTAL AREA 100 -Year Existing Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 2.270 HSG B EXIST 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 2.270 TOTAL AREA 100 -Year Existing Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Printed 11/14/2016 Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG -A HSG -B HSG -C HSG -D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 1.560 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.560 >75% Grass cover, Good EXIST 0.000 0.300 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.300 Paved parking EXIST 0.000 0.410 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.410 Woods, Fair EXIST 0.000 2.270 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.270 TOTAL AREA 100 -Year Existing MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 6.87" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span =5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt =0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment EXIST: Runoff Area =2.270 ac 13.22% Impervious Runoff Depth >2.95" Flow Length =230' Slope= 0.0440 T Tc =21.5 min CN =66 Runoff =7.52 cfs 0.557 of Total Runoff Area = 2.270 ac Runoff Volume = 0.557 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.95" 86.78% Pervious = 1.970 ac 13.22% Impervious = 0.300 ac 100 -Year Existing MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 6.87" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment EXIST: Runoff = 7.52 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 0.557 af, Depth> 2.95" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 6.87" Area (ac) CN Descri 0.300 98 Paved parking, HSG B 1.560 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.410 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B 2.270 66 Weighted Average 1.970 86.78% Pervious Area 0.300 13.22% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 21.5 230 0.0440 0.18 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.84" DA3 DRAINS OFFSITE DA2 DA1 1B2 IB1 Subcat Reach Pon Link Routing Diagram for 2 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design, Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD ®10.00 -18 s/n 06266 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 2 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment- numbers) 1.170 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (DA1, DA2, DA3) 1.040 98 Paved parking, HSG B (DA1, DA2, DA3) 0.050 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B (DA3) 2.260 78 TOTAL AREA 2 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 2.260 HSG B DA1, DA2, DA3 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 2.260 TOTAL AREA 2 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG -A HSG -B HSG -C HSG -D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 1.170 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.170 >75% Grass cover, Good DA1, DA2, DA3 0.000 1.040 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.040 Paved parking DA1, DA2, DA3 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 Woods, Fair DA3 0.000 2.260 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.260 TOTAL AREA 2 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In- Invert Out - Invert Length Slope n Diam /Width Height Inside -Fill Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) 1 1131 956.50 951.43 46.0 0.1102 0.013 12.0 0.0 0.0 2 1132 951.50 951.43 14.0 0.0050 0.013 12.0 0.0 0.0 2 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span =5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt =0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment DA1: Runoff Area =0.860 ac 77.91% Impervious Runoff Depth >1.77" Flow Length =100' Tc =4.0 min CN =90 Runoff =3.00 cfs 0.127 of Subcatchment DA2: Runoff Area =0.550 ac 41.82% Impervious Runoff Depth >0.86" Flow Length =100' Slope= 0.0200 T Tc =0.8 min CN =76 Runoff =1.03 cfs 0.039 of Subcatchment DA3: DRAINS OFFSITE Runoff Area =0.850 ac 16.47% Impervious Runoff Depth >0.47" Flow Length =60' Slope= 0.0750 T Tc =5.9 min CN =67 Runoff =0.68 cfs 0.033 of Pond 11131: Peak Elev= 956.87' Storage =0.079 of Inflow =3.00 cfs 0.127 of Discarded =0.04 cfs 0.029 of Primary =0.19 cfs 0.038 of Outflow =0.23 cfs 0.068 of Pond 11132: Peak Elev= 951.68' Storage =0.021 of Inflow =1.03 cfs 0.039 of Discarded =0.02 cfs 0.011 of Primary =0.08 cfs 0.012 of Outflow =0.10 cfs 0.023 of Total Runoff Area = 2.260 ac Runoff Volume = 0.200 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.06" 53.98% Pervious = 1.220 ac 46.02% Impervious = 1.040 ac 2 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment DA1: Runoff = 3.00 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.127 af, Depth> 1.77" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 2.84" Area (ac) CN Description 0.670 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.190 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.860 90 Weighted Average 0.190 22.09% Pervious Area 0.670 77.91% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 2.8 15 0.0300 0.09 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.84" 1.2 85 0.0160 1.15 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.84" Runoff = 100 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA2: 1.03 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af, Depth> 0.86" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 2.84" Area (ac) CN Description 0.230 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.320 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.550 76 Weighted Average 0.320 58.18% Pervious Area 0.230 41.82% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 0.8 100 0.0200 2.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Summary for Subcatchment DA3: DRAINS OFFSITE Runoff = 0.68 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.033 af, Depth> 0.47" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 2.84" 2 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Area (ac) CN Description 0.140 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.660 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.050 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B 0.850 67 Weighted Average 0.710 83.53% Pervious Area 0.140 16.47% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 5.9 60 0.0750 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.84" Summary for Pond 111131: Inflow Area = 0.860 ac, 77.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.77" Inflow = 3.00 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.127 of Outflow = 0.23 cfs @ 12.86 hrs, Volume= 0.068 af, Atten= 92 %, Lag= 45.2 min Discarded = 0.04 cfs @ 12.86 hrs, Volume= 0.029 of Primary = 0.19 cfs @ 12.86 hrs, Volume= 0.038 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 956.87' @ 12.86 hrs Surf.Area= 0.055 ac Storage= 0.079 of Plug -Flow detention time= 163.8 min calculated for 0.068 of (53% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 103.6 min ( 874.5 - 770.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 954.50' 2.486 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre -feet) (acre -feet) 954.50 0.013 0.000 0.000 955.00 0.021 0.008 0.008 956.00 0.038 0.029 0.038 957.00 0.058 0.048 0.086 958.00 0.081 0.069 0.155 959.00 0.106 0.093 0.249 980.00 0.107 2.236 2.486 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 956.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 46.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 956.50'/951.43' S= 0.1102 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 956.50' 4.0" Vert. Orifice /Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 957.80' 0.5' long x 1.20' rise Sharp- Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) 1.2' Crest Height #4 Discarded 954.50' 0.800 in /hr Exfiltration over Surface area 2 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 2.84" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Discarded OutFlow Max =0.04 cfs @ 12.86 hrs HW= 956.87' (Free Discharge) L4= Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.04 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =0.19 cfs @ 12.86 hrs HW= 956.87' (Free Discharge) L1= Culvert (Passes 0.19 cfs of 0.56 cfs potential flow) �__3=S 2= O rifice /Grate (Orifice Controls 0.19 cfs @ 2.19 fps) harp- Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 111132: Inflow Area = 0.550 ac, 41.82% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.86" Inflow = 1.03 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.039 of Outflow = 0.10 cfs @ 12.78 hrs, Volume= 0.023 af, Atten= 91 %, Lag= 42.7 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.78 hrs, Volume= 0.011 of Primary = 0.08 cfs @ 12.78 hrs, Volume= 0.012 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 951.68' @ 12.78 hrs Surf.Area= 0.021 ac Storage= 0.021 of Plug -Flow detention time= 158.1 min calculated for 0.023 of (58% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 86.9 min ( 884.7 - 797.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 950.00' 1.062 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre -feet) (acre -feet) 950.00 0.005 0.000 0.000 951.00 0.013 0.009 0.009 952.00 0.025 0.019 0.028 953.00 0.040 0.032 0.061 954.00 0.059 0.050 0.110 970.00 0.060 0.952 1.062 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 951.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 14.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 951.50'/951.43' S=0.0050'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.013, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 951.50' 4.0" Vert. Orifice /Grate C= 0.600 #3 Discarded 950.00' 0.800 in /hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max =0.02 cfs @ 12.78 hrs HW= 951.68' (Free Discharge) L3= Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =0.07 cfs @ 12.78 hrs HW= 951.68' (Free Discharge) L1= Culvert (Passes 0.07 cfs of 0.10 cfs potential flow) L2= Orifice /Grate (Orifice Controls 0.07 cfs @ 1.46 fps) DA3 DRAINS OFFSITE DA2 DA1 1B2 IB1 Subcat Reach Pon Link Routing Diagram for 10 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design, Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD ®10.00 -18 s/n 06266 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment- numbers) 1.170 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (DA1, DA2, DA3) 1.040 98 Paved parking, HSG B (DA1, DA2, DA3) 0.050 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B (DA3) 2.260 78 TOTAL AREA 10 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 2.260 HSG B DA1, DA2, DA3 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 2.260 TOTAL AREA 10 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG -A HSG -B HSG -C HSG -D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 1.170 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.170 >75% Grass cover, Good DA1, DA2, DA3 0.000 1.040 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.040 Paved parking DA1, DA2, DA3 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 Woods, Fair DA3 0.000 2.260 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.260 TOTAL AREA 10 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In- Invert Out - Invert Length Slope n Diam /Width Height Inside -Fill Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) 1 1131 956.50 951.43 46.0 0.1102 0.013 12.0 0.0 0.0 2 1132 951.50 951.43 14.0 0.0050 0.013 12.0 0.0 0.0 10 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span =5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt =0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment DA1: Runoff Area =0.860 ac 77.91% Impervious Runoff Depth >3.02" Flow Length =100' Tc =4.0 min CN =90 Runoff =4.96 cfs 0.217 of Subcatchment DA2: Runoff Area =0.550 ac 41.82% Impervious Runoff Depth >1.82" Flow Length =100' Slope= 0.0200 T Tc =0.8 min CN =76 Runoff =2.19 cfs 0.084 of Subcatchment DA3: DRAINS OFFSITE Runoff Area =0.850 ac 16.47% Impervious Runoff Depth >1.21" Flow Length =60' Slope= 0.0750 T Tc =5.9 min CN =67 Runoff =1.93 cfs 0.086 of Pond 11131: Peak Elev= 957.67' Storage =0.130 of Inflow =4.96 cfs 0.217 of Discarded =0.06 cfs 0.035 of Primary =0.42 cfs 0.119 of Outflow =0.48 cfs 0.155 of Pond 11132: Peak Elev= 952.37' Storage =0.038 of Inflow =2.19 cfs 0.084 of Discarded =0.02 cfs 0.012 of Primary =0.35 cfs 0.054 of Outflow =0.38 cfs 0.066 of Total Runoff Area = 2.260 ac Runoff Volume = 0.386 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.05" 53.98% Pervious = 1.220 ac 46.02% Impervious = 1.040 ac 10 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment DA1: Runoff = 4.96 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.217 af, Depth> 3.02" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 4.22" Area (ac) CN Description 0.670 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.190 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.860 90 Weighted Average 0.190 22.09% Pervious Area 0.670 77.91% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 2.8 15 0.0300 0.09 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.84" 1.2 85 0.0160 1.15 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.84" Runoff = 100 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA2: 2.19 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.084 af, Depth> 1.82" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 4.22" Area (ac) CN Description 0.230 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.320 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.550 76 Weighted Average 0.320 58.18% Pervious Area 0.230 41.82% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 0.8 100 0.0200 2.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Summary for Subcatchment DA3: DRAINS OFFSITE Runoff = 1.93 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.086 af, Depth> 1.21" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 4.22" 10 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Area (ac) CN Description 0.140 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.660 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.050 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B 0.850 67 Weighted Average 0.710 83.53% Pervious Area 0.140 16.47% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 5.9 60 0.0750 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.84" Summary for Pond 111131: Inflow Area = 0.860 ac, 77.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.02" Inflow = 4.96 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.217 of Outflow = 0.48 cfs @ 12.59 hrs, Volume= 0.155 af, Atten= 90 %, Lag= 29.2 min Discarded = 0.06 cfs @ 12.59 hrs, Volume= 0.035 of Primary = 0.42 cfs @ 12.59 hrs, Volume= 0.119 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 957.67' @ 12.59 hrs Surf.Area= 0.073 ac Storage= 0.130 of Plug -Flow detention time= 151.8 min calculated for 0.154 of (71 % of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 101.5 min ( 863.2 - 761.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 954.50' 2.486 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre -feet) (acre -feet) 954.50 0.013 0.000 0.000 955.00 0.021 0.008 0.008 956.00 0.038 0.029 0.038 957.00 0.058 0.048 0.086 958.00 0.081 0.069 0.155 959.00 0.106 0.093 0.249 980.00 0.107 2.236 2.486 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 956.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 46.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 956.50'/951.43' S= 0.1102 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 956.50' 4.0" Vert. Orifice /Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 957.80' 0.5' long x 1.20' rise Sharp- Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) 1.2' Crest Height #4 Discarded 954.50' 0.800 in /hr Exfiltration over Surface area 10 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 4.22" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Discarded OutFlow Max =0.06 cfs @ 12.59 hrs HW= 957.67' (Free Discharge) L4= Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.06 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =0.42 cfs @ 12.59 hrs HW= 957.67' (Free Discharge) L1= Culvert (Passes 0.42 cfs of 3.10 cfs potential flow) �__3=S 2= O rifice /Grate (Orifice Controls 0.42 cfs @ 4.83 fps) harp- Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 111132: Inflow Area = 0.550 ac, 41.82% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.82" Inflow = 2.19 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.084 of Outflow = 0.38 cfs @ 12.37 hrs, Volume= 0.066 af, Atten= 83 %, Lag= 18.6 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.37 hrs, Volume= 0.012 of Primary = 0.35 cfs @ 12.37 hrs, Volume= 0.054 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 952.37' @ 12.37 hrs Surf.Area= 0.031 ac Storage= 0.038 of Plug -Flow detention time= 99.8 min calculated for 0.066 of (79% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 49.4 min ( 834.5 - 785.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 950.00' 1.062 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre -feet) (acre -feet) 950.00 0.005 0.000 0.000 951.00 0.013 0.009 0.009 952.00 0.025 0.019 0.028 953.00 0.040 0.032 0.061 954.00 0.059 0.050 0.110 970.00 0.060 0.952 1.062 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 951.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 14.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 951.50'/951.43' S=0.0050'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.013, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 951.50' 4.0" Vert. Orifice /Grate C= 0.600 #3 Discarded 950.00' 0.800 in /hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max =0.02 cfs @ 12.37 hrs HW= 952.37' (Free Discharge) L3= Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =0.35 cfs @ 12.37 hrs HW= 952.37' (Free Discharge) L1= Culvert (Passes 0.35 cfs of 1.70 cfs potential flow) L2= Orifice /Grate (Orifice Controls 0.35 cfs @ 4.03 fps) DA3 DRAINS OFFSITE DA2 DA1 1B2 IB1 Subcat Reach Pon Link Routing Diagram for 100 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design, Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD ®10.00 -18 s/n 06266 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 100 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment- numbers) 1.170 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (DA1, DA2, DA3) 1.040 98 Paved parking, HSG B (DA1, DA2, DA3) 0.050 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B (DA3) 2.260 78 TOTAL AREA 100 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 2.260 HSG B DA1, DA2, DA3 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 2.260 TOTAL AREA 100 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG -A HSG -B HSG -C HSG -D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 1.170 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.170 >75% Grass cover, Good DA1, DA2, DA3 0.000 1.040 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.040 Paved parking DA1, DA2, DA3 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 Woods, Fair DA3 0.000 2.260 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.260 TOTAL AREA 100 -Year Proposed Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In- Invert Out - Invert Length Slope n Diam /Width Height Inside -Fill Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) 1 1131 956.50 951.43 46.0 0.1102 0.013 12.0 0.0 0.0 2 1132 951.50 951.43 14.0 0.0050 0.013 12.0 0.0 0.0 100 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 6.87" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span =5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt =0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment DA1: Runoff Area =0.860 ac 77.91% Impervious Runoff Depth >5.52" Flow Length =100' Tc =4.0 min CN =90 Runoff =8.69 cfs 0.395 of Subcatchment DA2: Runoff Area =0.550 ac 41.82% Impervious Runoff Depth >3.98" Flow Length =100' Slope= 0.0200 T Tc =0.8 min CN =76 Runoff =4.66 cfs 0.183 of Subcatchment DA3: DRAINS OFFSITE Runoff Area =0.850 ac 16.47% Impervious Runoff Depth >3.06" Flow Length =60' Slope= 0.0750 T Tc =5.9 min CN =67 Runoff =4.91 cfs 0.217 of Pond 11131: Peak Elev= 958.69' Storage =0.218 of Inflow =8.69 cfs 0.395 of Discarded =0.08 cfs 0.045 of Primary =1.56 cfs 0.286 of Outflow =1.64 cfs 0.331 of Pond 11132: Peak Elev= 953.66' Storage =0.091 of Inflow =4.66 cfs 0.183 of Discarded =0.04 cfs 0.017 of Primary =0.59 cfs 0.147 of Outflow =0.63 cfs 0.164 of Total Runoff Area = 2.260 ac Runoff Volume = 0.795 of Average Runoff Depth = 4.22" 53.98% Pervious = 1.220 ac 46.02% Impervious = 1.040 ac 100 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 6.87" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment DA1: Runoff = 8.69 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.395 af, Depth> 5.52" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 6.87" Area (ac) CN Description 0.670 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.190 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.860 90 Weighted Average 0.190 22.09% Pervious Area 0.670 77.91% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 2.8 15 0.0300 0.09 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.84" 1.2 85 0.0160 1.15 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.84" Runoff = 100 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA2: 4.66 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.183 af, Depth> 3.98" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 6.87" Area (ac) CN Description 0.230 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.320 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.550 76 Weighted Average 0.320 58.18% Pervious Area 0.230 41.82% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 0.8 100 0.0200 2.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Summary for Subcatchment DA3: DRAINS OFFSITE Runoff = 4.91 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.217 af, Depth> 3.06" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 6.87" 100 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 6.87" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Area (ac) CN Description 0.140 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.660 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.050 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B 0.850 67 Weighted Average 0.710 83.53% Pervious Area 0.140 16.47% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 5.9 60 0.0750 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.84" Summary for Pond 111131: Inflow Area = 0.860 ac, 77.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.52" Inflow = 8.69 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.395 of Outflow = 1.64 cfs @ 12.37 hrs, Volume= 0.331 af, Atten= 81%, Lag= 16.1 min Discarded = 0.08 cfs @ 12.37 hrs, Volume= 0.045 of Primary = 1.56 cfs @ 12.37 hrs, Volume= 0.286 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 958.69' @ 12.37 hrs Surf.Area= 0.098 ac Storage= 0.218 of Plug -Flow detention time= 134.6 min calculated for 0.331 of (84% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 94.2 min ( 845.3 - 751.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 954.50' 2.486 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre -feet) (acre -feet) 954.50 0.013 0.000 0.000 955.00 0.021 0.008 0.008 956.00 0.038 0.029 0.038 957.00 0.058 0.048 0.086 958.00 0.081 0.069 0.155 959.00 0.106 0.093 0.249 980.00 0.107 2.236 2.486 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 956.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 46.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 956.50'/951.43' S= 0.1102 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 956.50' 4.0" Vert. Orifice /Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 957.80' 0.5' long x 1.20' rise Sharp- Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) 1.2' Crest Height #4 Discarded 954.50' 0.800 in /hr Exfiltration over Surface area 100 -Year Proposed MSE 24 -hr 3 Rainfall= 6.87" Prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design Printed 11/14/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00 -18 s/n 06266 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Discarded OutFlow Max =0.08 cfs @ 12.37 hrs HW= 958.69' (Free Discharge) L4= Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.08 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =1.56 cfs @ 12.37 hrs HW= 958.69' (Free Discharge) L1= Culvert (Passes 1.56 cfs of 4.92 cfs potential flow) �__3=S 2= O rifice /Grate (Orifice Controls 0.60 cfs @ 6.85 fps) harp- Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.97 cfs @ 3.37 fps) Summary for Pond 111132: Inflow Area = 0.550 ac, 41.82% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.98" Inflow = 4.66 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.183 of Outflow = 0.63 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 0.164 af, Atten= 86 %, Lag= 22.2 min Discarded = 0.04 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 0.017 of Primary = 0.59 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 0.147 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 953.66' @ 12.43 hrs Surf.Area= 0.052 ac Storage= 0.091 of Plug -Flow detention time= 94.6 min calculated for 0.163 of (89% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 63.1 min ( 835.3 - 772.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 950.00' 1.062 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre -feet) (acre -feet) 950.00 0.005 0.000 0.000 951.00 0.013 0.009 0.009 952.00 0.025 0.019 0.028 953.00 0.040 0.032 0.061 954.00 0.059 0.050 0.110 970.00 0.060 0.952 1.062 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 951.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 14.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 951.50'/951.43' S=0.0050'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.013, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 951.50' 4.0" Vert. Orifice /Grate C= 0.600 #3 Discarded 950.00' 0.800 in /hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max =0.04 cfs @ 12.43 hrs HW= 953.66' (Free Discharge) L3= Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.04 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =0.59 cfs @ 12.43 hrs HW= 953.66' (Free Discharge) L1= Culvert (Passes 0.59 cfs of 4.87 cfs potential flow) L2= Orifice /Grate (Orifice Controls 0.59 cfs @ 6.79 fps) I' 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763- 541 -4800 Fax: 763 - 541 -1700 November 30, 2016 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Moon Motors Site Plan Review City Project No. 2016 -047 WSB Project No. 02596 -370 Dear Ms. Schumann: We have reviewed the civil plans, dated November 7, 2016 and the stormwater report dated November 14, 2016, as prepared by Schultz Engineering and Site Design and offer the following comments. Site Plan 1. The applicant is proposing a new access approximately 240 -foot west of the existing access from Chelsea Road. This additional access is acceptable given access spacing requirements and traffic generated by the site. Details 2. City standard detail plates 6003 related to construction entrances shall be included. SWPPP Plan 3. The SWPPP plan sheets should be updated to correct the existing and proposed impervious areas and the disturbed area. 4. The applicant shall revise the SWPPP as needed to comply with the MPCA SWPPP checklist. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K: \02596- 370\ Admin \Docs \LTR -a- Schumann- MoonMotors 112916.doa November 30, 2016 Page 2 Stormwater Management Plan 5. The proposed infiltration basins on the site are providing additional rate control needed beyond what the downstream regional ponding along Chelsea Road was designed for. 6. The proposed site improvements create less than 1 acre or more of new impervious surface, thus volume reduction is not required at this time. The applicant has identified a future building beyond the current improvements to the site. The future building addition and the current improvements will create more than 1 acre of new impervious surface, therefore if a future building addition does occur, the infiltration basins will likely need to be enlarged to meet City and the MN Stormwater Manual standards at that time. 7. Enclosed is a stormwater plan review checklist that identifies comments the applicant shall address. 8. The applicant shall enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement with the City. A template agreement will be provided to the applicant for execution. 9. The NPDES /SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit shall be provided with the grading permit or prior to application for review. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763 - 271 -3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. A�"- t. essO$It- Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC Enclosure skb K:\ 02596 -370\ Admin \Docs \LTR -a- Schumann- MoonMotors 112916.doa CITY Of jktonliceff � City of Monticello — Stormwater Site flan Review Address: Moon Motorsports 3613 Chelsea Road Permit No: 11/07/16 PID: Schultz Engineering & Site Design Date Approved: Storm Water Calculations, Moon Motorsports 2016 Building Addition Date Received: 11/14/16 Signature: Site Size (acres): 2.27 Area of Disturbance(acres): 1.9 Existing Impervious (acres): 0.3 ac Proposed Impervious (acres): 1.16 ac A Stormwater Management Plan is required for: - Any land disturbing activity that may ultimately result in the addition of one acre or greater of impervious surfaces, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common plan of development that may be constructed at different times. - The construction of any new public or private road; or - Any land disturbance activity, regardless of size, that the City determines is likely to cause an adverse impact to an environmentally sensitive area or other property. Submittals Received Date Document Author 11/07/16 16057 Moon Civil City Submittal Schultz Engineering & Site Design 11/14/16 Storm Water Calculations, Moon Motorsports 2016 Building Addition Schultz Engineering & Site Design 11/16/16 Email from Brian Schultz regarding net increase impervious area following locations: • Each lot corner ® ❑ General Site Plan Yes No 1. Scale of Survey. Minimum scale 1" = 50'. Maximum size plan sheet 24" x 36" ® ❑ 2. Survey signed by a registered survey with elevations in NGVD -1929 datum for the following locations: • Each lot corner ® ❑ • Grade elevation at the foundation and elevation of top of foundation of structures on ® El lots • Grade elevation at the foundation, elevation of top of foundation and garage floor of ® El new construction • Lowest point of entry (i.e. door sill or top of window well) of proposed and existing ® 11 construction • Lowest floor of proposed and existing construction ® ❑ 3. Any proposed retaining wall must have a top and bottom elevation and bottom elevation F] El be finish grade. Also, no retaining wall is allowed to be built on private property October 2016 4. Retaining walls greater than 4.0 feet in height have been designed and certified by a ❑ ❑ licensed professional engineer and a building permit has been acquired 5. All drainage and utility easements are shown? ® ❑ 6. Easements are clear of any encroachments? ® ❑ 7. New curb cuts proposed? ® ❑ 8. If new curb cut is proposed, stamp all survey maps with the curb cut stamp. Also, write a note on the Residential Plan & Routing Approval form reminding the builder that a curb ❑ ❑ cut permit is required if the driveway is moved or a new driveway is added 9. Low floor a minimum of 4.25' (feet) above the sanitary sewer invert elevation ® ❑ Comments: Yes 4 No 4 1. 7 SWPPP notes provided on the plan ® El 2. Temporary stabilization measures provided ® ❑ 3. Erosion control blankets provided on all slopes greater than 3:1 ® ❑ 4. Perimeter Control i.e., Silt Fence, Filter Log, etc. ® ❑ 5. Phasing for sites that are >_ 1 acre ® ❑ 6. CB Inlet Protection ® ❑ 7. Dewatering ® ❑ 8. Sediment control ® ❑ 9. Waste control ® ❑ 10. Concrete washout ® ❑ 11. Rock entrance ® ❑ 12. Street sweeping schedule ® ❑ 13. Permanent restoration plan ® ❑ 14. Erosion protection at all outlet pipes ® ❑ 15. SWPPP includes an erosion and sediment control inspection schedule and person ® ❑ responsible for maintenance Comments: Please update the HydroCAD Model, Stormwater Report, Planset and SWPPP to reflect consistent impervious areas for existing and proposed conditions for the project area. Stormwater Management Plan Yes No � 1. Delineation maps for existing and proposed conditions ® ❑ 2. Modeling calculations for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 storm events with an MSE3 type distribution. • 2 year 24 hr. (2.84 "), 10 year 24 hr. (4.22 "), 100 (6.87 "), 10 -day snowmelt (7.2 ") ® ❑ • Modeled direct connected impervious separate ® ❑ 3. Off -site drainage included ❑ 4. Wetlands shown on plans and wetland permitting completed ❑ 5. Pretreatment ® ❑ 6. Skimmer structures provided on the outlets of all ponds. ® ❑ 7. Soil borings ❑ October 2016 8. Design Infiltration Rate Determination — Geotechnical Report or Infiltration Testing ❑ provided 9. Seasonal High Water Elevation ® ❑ 10. Open channel flow calculations ❑ N 11. Storm sewer calculations — 10 year event N ❑ 12. Narrative describing the following: a. Existing Conditions: Existing conditions includes a building and parking area. Proposed conditions includes a building addition and additional parking area. b. Proposed Conditions: Net impervious area increase is 0.3 acres. Two infiltration basins to provide rate control. Infiltration/volume reduction was determined to not be c. Stormwater Management for Proposed necessary because the new impervious surface is less than Site: 1 acre. Comments: The report indicates that soil borings will be provided at a later date. In addition to soil borings, infiltration tests are required in order to verify the design infiltration rate. The lowest infiltration rate within five feet of the bottom of the infiltration basin should be used for design purposes. Water Quality and Volume Reduction The City of :Monticello has adopted .WC4 :Minimal Impact Design Standards in Chapter 4 of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 4.70. MIDs In design criteria as described in the MPCA Stormwater Manual shall be followed for the proposed project. Yes No 1. Volume control provided as per the City's Engineering Design Standards and MIDS (1.1" ❑ over new impervious surface) 2. Impervious area equal to or greater than the net increase in impervious surface is routed through infiltration BMP ❑ 3. Sequencing provided for alternatives where infiltration is infeasible ❑ 4. Required Volume Reduction: NA 5. Provided Volume Reduction: NA 6. Separation to groundwater and/or bedrock is a minimum of 3 feet from bottom of El infiltration BMP 7. Drawdown time for infiltration BMP is within 48 hours ❑ N 8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria ❑ N 9. If infiltration of 1.1" is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site? ❑ N Comments: MIDs and NPDES infiltration requirements are not trigerred. Soil borings will be provided at a later date in order to verify adequate bedrock/groundwater separation. The modeled infiltration rate of 0.8 in/hr is typical for HSG "A" soils. HSG "B" soils typically have infiltration rates closer to 0.4 in/hr. The model needs to reflect the correct infiltration rate. The drawdown time and area for the BMP needs to be based on the correct and most accurate infiltration rate, once it is determined. 1. Peak Proposed Discharge Rates < Existing ❑ N 2. Existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 year storm? N ❑ October2016 3. Existing infrastructure and EOF for proposed 100 year peak discharge rate? © ❑ 4. Proposed flow patterns do not create flooding impacts for structures adjacent to the ❑ property? Comments: The HydroCAD modeling results and stormwater report summary are not consistent. Proposed peak rates slightly exceeded existing rates in the HydroCAD model. Freeboard Yes 4 do 4 1. Building Opening: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins ® ❑ • 2' above EOF of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins ® ❑ • 2' above the 100 -yr flow elevation of a swale or channel at the point where the swale ® ❑ channel is closest to the building 2. Low Floor Elevation: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of major basins ® ❑ • 2' above EOF of major basins ® ❑ • For landlocked basins: 2' above the HWL from back to back 100 -yr rainfalls or 2' above the HWL from the 100 -yr 10 -day snowmelt, whichever is higher. Starting elevation of the basin/waterbody prior to runoff is one of the following: o Existing Ordinary High Water level established by the Minnesota Department ❑ ❑ of Natural Resources o Annual water balance calculation approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Local observation well records, as approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Mottled soil ❑ ❑ October 2016 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S. I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure (c) Interim Permitted Uses = I An "I" indicates that a use may be permitted for a brief period of time provided certain conditions are met, and a specific event or date can be established for discontinuance of the use. Inability of the City ]o establish conditions to adequately control anticipated impacts is justification for denial of an interim permitted use. Interim Permitted Uses may also be subject to special regulations as referenced in the "Additional Requirements" column. (d) Prohibited Uses = Shaded Cells A shaded cell indicates that the listed use is prohibited in the respective base zoning district. (e) Unlisted Uses If an application is submitted for a use that is not listed in Table 5 -1, the Community Development Department is authorized to classify the new or unlisted use into an existing Use Type that most closely fits the new or unlisted use. If no similar use determination can be made, the use will be considered prohibited in which case an amendment to the ordinance text would need to be initiated to clarify if, where, and how a proposed use could be established. Page 318 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section S.I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT • Use Types Base Zoning Districts Conditionally Permitted • Additional Requirements "I" = Interim Permitted Residential Uses 5.2(C)(1) Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(Cl(2)(a) - Duplex p C 5.2(C)(2)(b) 5.2(C )(2)(c) 5.2(C)(2)(d) None 5 2(C)(3) - Townhouse C p - Multiple - Family C P C C Detached Dwelling p p p p p p Group Residential P Facility, Single Family Group Residential ji C C 5.2(C)(3) Facility, Multi - Family Mobile & Manufactured C C P C 5.2(C)(4) Home / Home Park Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P P P P p p p p p None (public) Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P 5.2(D)(1) (private) Assisted Living Facilities C p C 5.2(D)(2) Cemeteries C C C C C C C 5.2(D)(3) Clinics /Medical Services C P P C None Essential Services p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p None Hospitals C P P C 5.2(D)(4) Nursing /Convalescent C C C C C C C C C P P 5.2(D)(5) Home Passenger Terminal C C C C None Passive Parks and Open P P P P p P P P P P P P p p p None Space Place of Public Assembly C C C C C p C 5.2(D)(6) Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P 5.2(D)(7) Schools, K -12 C C C C C C I I 5.2(D)(8) Schools, Higher 11 None Education C Utilities (major) C C C 5.2(D)(9) Office Uses Offices P P C P P P P 5.2(E) City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 319 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S. I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure TABLE 5- 1: USES BY DISTRICT (cont.) Use Types Base Zoning Districts "P" = Permitted I C I Conditionally Permitted • "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Uses A.. Requirements Adult Uses P P C P 3.7(K) 5.2(F l(21 51 1.2 F"4 Auction House P Auto Repair — Minor C C Automotive Wash Facilities P C Bed & Breakfasts C C C C C 5.2 F 5 Boarding House C 5.2 F 6 Brew Pub I I P P 5.2 F 7 Business Support Services P P P P P None Commercial Lodging C P P 5.2(l(8) Communications /Broadcasting P P P P 5.2(F1(91 Convenience Retail C P P P 5.20(I O) Country Club C P C 5.20(1 I) 5.20(12) Day Care Centers C C P Entertainment/Recreation, Indoor Commercial I P P C C C 5.200 3) Entertainment /Recreation, Outdoor Commercial C C C C 5.2 F I4 Financial Institution P C P 5.20(15) Funeral Services P P 5.2 F I6 Kennels (commercial) C 5.20(17) Landscaping / Nursery Business P 5.2(F)(1 8) Personal Services C P P P P P 5.20(22) Production Brewery or Micro - Distillery without Taproom P P 5.2U(I0) Production Brewery or Micro - Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room C C C C C 5.2(F)(24) 5.2(U(! I) Recreational Vehicle Camp Site C C 5.20(25) Repair Establishment C P P 5.20(26) Restaurants C P P 5.20(27) Retail Commercial Uses (other) P P P 5.2(F)(28) Specialty Eating Establishments C P P P 5.2(F)(29) Page 320 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure TABLE 5 -IA: CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT (CCD) USES Use Types Sub - Districts "P" = Permitted Exceptions Additional "C" = Conditionally Permitted F -1 F -2 F -3 L TRequirements "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Day Care Commercial Lodging • City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 321 TABLE 5- 1: USES BY DISTRICT (cont.) Use Types Base Zoning Districts Conditionally Additio Permitted "I" = Interim Permitted Require Vehicle Fuel Sales C C C 5.2 F 30 Vehicle Sales and Rental C C 7 5.20(31) Veterinary Facilities C 5.2(F)(32) (Rural) Veterinary Facilities C C C 5.20(32) (Neighborhood) Wholesale Sales P P P None Industrial Uses Auto Repair — Major C P P 5.2(G l Bulk Fuel Sales and P P 5.2(G)f21 Storage Contractor's Yard, I I I 5.2(G)(3) Temporary Extraction of Materials I I I j.2 (G 4 General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(G1(51 Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(G l(61 Industrial Services C P None Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 1_2 G 7 Light Manufacturing P P P 5.2(G)(81 Machinery /Truck Repair P P 5.2(G)(9) & Sales Recycling and Salvage C C 5.2(G)(I 0) Center Self- Storage Facilities P C P 5.2 G I I Truck or Freight C P P 5.2(G)(� 2) Terminal C 5.20(13) Waste Disposal & Incineration I P 5.20(14) Wrecker Services C A TABLE 5 -IA: CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT (CCD) USES Use Types Sub - Districts "P" = Permitted Exceptions Additional "C" = Conditionally Permitted F -1 F -2 F -3 L TRequirements "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Day Care Commercial Lodging • City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 321 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S. I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Sub-Districts TABLE 5- 1 A: CENTRAL COMMUNITY Use Types Permitted Conditionally Permitted Commercial Offices — Principal C P P DISTRICT (CCD) USES Exceptions C L -2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors Additional Requirements 5.2(F)(20) Commercial Recreation: Indoor P P C C none 5.2(F)(13 Commercial Recreation: Outdoor C C none 5.2(F)(I 4) Convenience Retail C P* C C *F -2 Drive Through by CUP 5.24F I0) Funeral Services C C none 5.20(16) Medical /Clinical Services C P P P L -2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors 5.20(19) Personal Services P P P P L -3: CUP 5.2 F 22 Places of Public Assembly C C C C none 5.2(F)(23) Production Brewery or Micro - Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room C C C C none 5.2(U(24) Professional Office- Services Including Financial Institutions P P P C L -2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors 5.2(F)(I 5). 5.2(F�(21) Restaurants, Bars < 10,000 SF P P C C none 5.2 F 27 Restaurants, Bars > 10,000 SF P C C none 5.2 F 2 Retail Sales < 10,000 SF P P C C none 5.2(F)(28) Retail Sales > 10,000 SF P C C none 5.2(F)(28) Retail with Service P C C L -2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors 5.2(F)(28) Specialty Eating Establishments < 10,000 SF P* P* C* P* *Drive Through by CUP 5.2(F)(29) Vehicle Fuel Sales C C C* L -8 only 5.2 F 30 Veterinary Facilities C P C C none 5.2(F)(32) Residential —Upper Floors P P P P L -2: NA Residential — Street Level C C L -2: NA Residential — Multiple Family C C L -2: NA Residential — Townhouse C none Residential — Single Family C none Industrial PUD L -3: PUD Only Public Buildings or Uses C C C P none Page 322 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 2N. Consideration of a reauest for amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 1 for amendment to regulations for Vehicle Sales and Rental in the B -4 (Regional Business) District and Chapter 5, Section 1 for regulations for Accessory Use Auto Repair — Minor in the B -4 (Regional Business District). Applicant: City of Monticello (AS) Planning Case Number: 2016 -048 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Amend the Monticello Zoning Ordinance as related to allowable principal and accessory vehicle- related uses in the B -3 and B -4 Districts. Deadline for Decision: Not applicable; City request Land Use Designation: "Places to Shop " / Commercial - guided areas Zoning Designation: B -3 (Highway Business) and B -4 (Regional Business) districts The purpose of the `B -3" (Highway Business) district is to provide for limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. The purpose of the `B -4" (Regional Business) district is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. Overlays /Environmental Regulations Applicable: N/A Current Site Use: N/A Surrounding Land Uses: N/A Project Description /Analysis: The City is asked to consider adoption of a resolution recommending amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance as it relates to vehicle- oriented principal and accessory uses within the B -3 and B -4 zoning districts of the City. City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 Specifically, the City is asked to amend the code to remove "Vehicle Sales and Rental" as an allowable principal use within the B -4 District, and to add "Auto Repair- Minor" as an allowable conditional accessory use within the B -4 District. As Council is aware, the City re- codified its zoning ordinance in 2011. Prior to that re- codification, the code was arranged in a "cascading" or "umbrella" format, where the majority of uses allowed as principal uses in a B -1 District were then also allowed in a B- 2 District, then B -3 and B -4, and so on. The prior code sections for the B -3 and B -4 District are attached for reference. In the re- codification, this cascading of uses was incorporated to some extent, but was enhanced by the inclusion of the tables and the separation of use regulations. However, it appears that the cascading of language may have led to the inclusion of a listing for "Vehicle Sales and Rental" as a conditional principal use in the Use Table for the B -4 District. In reviewing the prior code language, it appears that this was in error, as the prior codification of the ordinance did not allow "Vehicle Sales and Rental" as a either permitted or conditional principal use within the B -4 District. The basis for why "Vehicle Sales and Rental" was not intended to be allowed within the B -4 District is two -fold. First, these uses are most appropriate to the B -3 District, where the specific purpose of the district is to provide for and limit automobile- oriented uses, leaving more traditional commercial and retail uses within the B -1, B -2 and B -4 Districts. The B -4 District is oriented toward "shopping center " - retail developments. Secondly, B- 3 zoning areas are clustered geographically at major intersections or interchanges of roads within the community to better support the vehicular - oriented land uses. In reviewing the above "Vehicle Sales and Rental" item for amendment, it was also noted that the prior codification of the ordinance allowed "Motor fuel station, auto repair - minor, and tire and battery stores and service" as conditional accessory uses in the B -4 District. In the code revision, these uses were not included as allowable conditional accessory uses in the B -4. Staff believes that was also in error. In example, there are many principal use retailers or convenience retail stores which include accessory use vehicle fuel sales and minor auto repair. These include retailers such as Walmart and the future Mills Fleet Farm. As a related side -note, the use listed as "tire and battery sales and service" is now incorporated within "Auto Repair- Minor ". "Auto Repair- Minor" is an allowable conditional principal use in the B -3 District and would become an allowable conditional accessory use in the B -4 District with the proposed amendment. It should be noted that the public hearing notice did not include a reference to consideration for "Vehicle Fuel Sales" as an accessory use in the B -4 District and as such, that item would be for future consideration. The Monticello Zoning Ordinance states that recommendations for amendments to the zoning ordinance should be based on the following criteria: (a) Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error in the original text or map; or 2 City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 (b) Whether the proposed amendment addresses needs arising from a changing condition, trend, or fact affecting the subject property and surrounding area. (c) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with achieving the goals and objectives outlined in the comprehensive plan. Based on a review of prior ordinances, the zoning map, and the history of related land use applications, staff believes that the ordinance allowing "Vehicle Sales & Rental" in the B -4 District is in error. Similarly, staff believe the omission of "Auto Repair- Minor" as a conditional accessory use in the B -4 District is also in error. City Council will also note for reference and comparison purposes the available land areas zoned for both B -3 and B -4 uses. There is a significant amount of land available in both districts. As such, correcting this error in the code is important for future land use guidance and land use compatibility. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission reviewed this item on December 6th, 2016 and held a public hearing on the proposed amendments. No members of the public were present to address the item. The Commission requested information on potential for non - conformities created by the amendment. Staff responded that the creation of non - conforming uses should be minimal; the proposed amendments, particularly to the B -4 text, will actually bring sites into compliance for minor auto repair uses. The Commission recommended the proposed amendments unanimously. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The Planning Commission recommends alternative I below. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 657 for amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance for regulations for Vehicle Sales and Rental in the B -4 (Regional Business) District and Chapter 5, Section 1 for regulations for Accessory Use Auto Repair — Minor in the B -4 (Regional Business District), based on findings in Resolution No. PC- 2016 -044. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Ordinance NO. 657 for amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance for regulations for Vehicle Sales and Rental in the B -4 (Regional Business) District and Chapter 5, Section 1 for regulations for Accessory Use Auto Repair — Minor in the B -4 (Regional Business District), based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table for additional information. City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 above. As noted, staff believe that the proposed amendments correct an error in the ordinance which occurred during the re- codification of the zoning ordinance in 2011. Staff believes the proposed amendments are appropriate to maintain consistency with current land uses within the B -3 and B -4 Districts and the intent for future land use within the City. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Ordinance No. 657, Draft B. Resolution No. PC- 2016 -044 C. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5, Section 1 and 3, and Chapter 8, Section 4 — Definitions, Excerpts D. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 13 and 14, prior codification E. Monticello Zoning Map 2 ORDINANCE NO. 657 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE, CHAPTER 5, SECTION 1 AND SECTION 3 FOR REGUALTIONS RELATING TO VEHICLE - ORIENTED USES IN THE B -3 AND B -4 ZONING DISTRICTS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0, MINNESOTA HEREBY ORDAINS. Section L _ Chapter 5, Section.1 — Table 5 -1: Uses by District is hereby amended as follows: MMMO "Vehicle Sale and Rental" shall be removed as a Conditional Use, "C ", in the B -4 District. Section 2. Chapter 5, Section 3(C) — Table 5 -4 Accessory Uses by District is hereby amended as follows: MR mm�% "Auto Repair- Minor" shall be shown as a Conditional Use, "C ", in the B -4 District. s Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations and diagrams that result from such amendments, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 12th day of December, 2016. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -044 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGULATING VEHICLE SALE & RENTAL AND REPAIR -MINOR IN THE B -3 AND B -4 ZONING DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is proposing to amend the zoning ordinance relating to the regulation of vehicle- oriented uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will correct an error or omission in the zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are consistent with the relevant general and conditional zoning requirements of the B -3, Highway Business and B -4, Regional Business zoning district purpose and intent; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the matter at its regular meeting on December 6th, 2016 and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed ordinance is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed ordinance amendment will meet the requirements and intent of other sections of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 3. The ordinance will not create undue burdens on public systems, including streets and utilities. 4. The proposed ordinance will not create substantial impacts, visual or otherwise, on neighboring land uses or public property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the proposed zoning ordinance amendment is hereby recommended for approval. ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 2016, by the Planning Conunission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MQ ATTEST: Angela'SeKuma ftn, 'Community Development Director 2 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S. I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure (c) Interim Permitted Uses = I An "I" indicates that a use may be permitted for a brief period of time provided certain conditions are met, and a specific event or date can be established for discontinuance of the use. Inability of the City ]o establish conditions to adequately control anticipated impacts is justification for denial of an interim permitted use. Interim Permitted Uses may also be subject to special regulations as referenced in the "Additional Requirements" column. (d) Prohibited Uses = Shaded Cells A shaded cell indicates that the listed use is prohibited in the respective base zoning district. (e) Unlisted Uses If an application is submitted for a use that is not listed in Table 5 -1, the Community Development Department is authorized to classify the new or unlisted use into an existing Use Type that most closely fits the new or unlisted use. If no similar use determination can be made, the use will be considered prohibited in which case an amendment to the ordinance text would need to be initiated to clarify if, where, and how a proposed use could be established. Page 318 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section S.I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT • Use Types Base Zoning Districts Conditionally Permitted • Additional Requirements "I" = Interim Permitted Residential Uses 5.2(C)(1) Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(Cl(2)(a) - Duplex p C 5.2(C)(2)(b) 5.2(C )(2)(c) 5.2(C)(2)(d) None 5 2(C)(3) - Townhouse C p - Multiple - Family C P C C Detached Dwelling p p p p p p Group Residential P Facility, Single Family Group Residential ji C C 5.2(C)(3) Facility, Multi - Family Mobile & Manufactured C C P C 5.2(C)(4) Home / Home Park Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P P P P p p p p p None (public) Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P 5.2(D)(1) (private) Assisted Living Facilities C p C 5.2(D)(2) Cemeteries C C C C C C C 5.2(D)(3) Clinics /Medical Services C P P C None Essential Services p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p None Hospitals C P P C 5.2(D)(4) Nursing /Convalescent C C C C C C C C C P P 5.2(D)(5) Home Passenger Terminal C C C C None Passive Parks and Open P P P P p P P P P P P P p p p None Space Place of Public Assembly C C C C C p C 5.2(D)(6) Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P 5.2(D)(7) Schools, K -12 C C C C C C I I 5.2(D)(8) Schools, Higher 11 None Education C Utilities (major) C C C 5.2(D)(9) Office Uses Offices P P C P P P P 5.2(E) City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 319 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S. I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure TABLE 5- 1: USES BY DISTRICT (cont.) Use Types Base Zoning Districts "P" = Permitted I C I Conditionally Permitted • "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Uses A.. Requirements Adult Uses P P C P 3.7(K) 5.2(F l(21 51 1.2 F"4 Auction House P Auto Repair — Minor C C Automotive Wash Facilities P C Bed & Breakfasts C C C C C 5.2 F 5 Boarding House C 5.2 F 6 Brew Pub I I P P 5.2 F 7 Business Support Services P P P P P None Commercial Lodging C P P 5.2(l(8) Communications /Broadcasting P P P P 5.2(F1(91 Convenience Retail C P P P 5.20(I O) Country Club C P C 5.20(1 I) 5.20(12) Day Care Centers C C P Entertainment/Recreation, Indoor Commercial I P P C C C 5.200 3) Entertainment /Recreation, Outdoor Commercial C C C C 5.2 F I4 Financial Institution P C P 5.20(15) Funeral Services P P 5.2 F I6 Kennels (commercial) C 5.20(17) Landscaping / Nursery Business P 5.2(F)(1 8) Personal Services C P P P P P 5.20(22) Production Brewery or Micro - Distillery without Taproom P P 5.2U(I0) Production Brewery or Micro - Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room C C C C C 5.2(F)(24) 5.2(U(! I) Recreational Vehicle Camp Site C C 5.20(25) Repair Establishment C P P 5.20(26) Restaurants C P P 5.20(27) Retail Commercial Uses (other) P P P 5.2(F)(28) Specialty Eating Establishments C P P P 5.2(F)(29) Page 320 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure TABLE 5 -IA: CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT (CCD) USES Use Types Sub - Districts "P" = Permitted Exceptions Additional "C" = Conditionally Permitted F -1 F -2 F -3 L TRequirements "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Day Care Commercial Lodging • City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 321 TABLE 5- 1: USES BY DISTRICT (cont.) Use Types Base Zoning Districts Conditionally Additio Permitted "I" = Interim Permitted Require Vehicle Fuel Sales C C C 5.2 F 30 Vehicle Sales and Rental C C 7 5.20(31) Veterinary Facilities C 5.2(F)(32) (Rural) Veterinary Facilities C C C 5.20(32) (Neighborhood) Wholesale Sales P P P None Industrial Uses Auto Repair — Major C P P 5.2(G l Bulk Fuel Sales and P P 5.2(G)f21 Storage Contractor's Yard, I I I 5.2(G)(3) Temporary Extraction of Materials I I I j.2 (G 4 General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(G1(51 Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(G l(61 Industrial Services C P None Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 1_2 G 7 Light Manufacturing P P P 5.2(G)(81 Machinery /Truck Repair P P 5.2(G)(9) & Sales Recycling and Salvage C C 5.2(G)(I 0) Center Self- Storage Facilities P C P 5.2 G I I Truck or Freight C P P 5.2(G)(� 2) Terminal C 5.20(13) Waste Disposal & Incineration I P 5.20(14) Wrecker Services C A TABLE 5 -IA: CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT (CCD) USES Use Types Sub - Districts "P" = Permitted Exceptions Additional "C" = Conditionally Permitted F -1 F -2 F -3 L TRequirements "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Day Care Commercial Lodging • City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 321 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S. I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Sub-Districts TABLE 5- 1 A: CENTRAL COMMUNITY Use Types Permitted Conditionally Permitted Commercial Offices — Principal C P P DISTRICT (CCD) USES Exceptions C L -2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors Additional Requirements 5.2(F)(20) Commercial Recreation: Indoor P P C C none 5.2(F)(13 Commercial Recreation: Outdoor C C none 5.2(F)(I 4) Convenience Retail C P* C C *F -2 Drive Through by CUP 5.24F I0) Funeral Services C C none 5.20(16) Medical /Clinical Services C P P P L -2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors 5.20(19) Personal Services P P P P L -3: CUP 5.2 F 22 Places of Public Assembly C C C C none 5.2(F)(23) Production Brewery or Micro - Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room C C C C none 5.2(U(24) Professional Office- Services Including Financial Institutions P P P C L -2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors 5.2(F)(I 5). 5.2(F�(21) Restaurants, Bars < 10,000 SF P P C C none 5.2 F 27 Restaurants, Bars > 10,000 SF P C C none 5.2 F 2 Retail Sales < 10,000 SF P P C C none 5.2(F)(28) Retail Sales > 10,000 SF P C C none 5.2(F)(28) Retail with Service P C C L -2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors 5.2(F)(28) Specialty Eating Establishments < 10,000 SF P* P* C* P* *Drive Through by CUP 5.2(F)(29) Vehicle Fuel Sales C C C* L -8 only 5.2 F 30 Veterinary Facilities C P C C none 5.2(F)(32) Residential —Upper Floors P P P P L -2: NA Residential — Street Level C C L -2: NA Residential — Multiple Family C C L -2: NA Residential — Townhouse C none Residential — Single Family C none Industrial PUD L -3: PUD Only Public Buildings or Uses C C C P none Page 322 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.2 Use - Specific Standards Subsection (F) Regulations for Commercial Uses (iii) Drive - through facilities shall be located to minimize their exposure to the street. (iv) Accessory structures, including canopies, menu boards, pay windows, and other structures supporting drive - through functions shall be constructed of materials to match those of the principal building. (v) Site planning shall be designed to emphasize connections to pedestrian facilities. (30) Vehicle Fuel Sales: (a) Regardless of whether the dispensing, sale, or offering for sale of motor fuels and /or oil is incidental to the conduct of the use or business, the standards and requirements imposed by this ordinance for motor fuel stations shall apply. These standards and requirements are, however, in addition to other requirements which are imposed for other uses of the property. (b) Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed. (c) All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be Section 4.5: Signs minimized and shall be in compliance with Section 4.5 of this ordinance. (d) Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. (e) If in the CCD District, the following standards shall also apply: (i) The design of the site promotes pedestrian access adjacent to and along the property. (ii) No more than two (2) curb cuts of twenty -four (24) feet in width or less shall be permitted. (iii) Site lighting shall utilize fixtures similar in style to that designated by the City for use in public areas of the "CCD" district. (iv) The building, site, and signage meet the standards for the "CCD" district and design review is conducted by the Planning Commission. (v) The proposed use demonstrates compatibility and consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown Revitalization Plan. (31) Vehicle Sales or Rental (a) The minimum building size for any vehicle sales or rental use shall comply with the standards in Table 5 -3. Page 352 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.2 Use - Specific Standards Subsection (F) Regulations for Commercial Uses TABLE 5 -3: MINIMUM BUILDING SIZE FOR VEHICLE SALES /RENTAL USES Parcel Size Lot Coverage Percent * Minimum Building Size 2,500 square feet 1' 10,000 square feet 40,000 square * Whichever requires the larger building Section 4.1(G): (b) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened with an opaque Standards for buffer (Table 4 -2, Buffer Type "D ") in accordance with section 4.1(G) of this Perimeter Buffers ordinance. (c) All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 4.4 of this ordinance. (d) The outside sales and display area shall be hard surfaced. (e) The outside sales and display area does not utilize parking spaces which are required for conformance with this ordinance. (f) Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement and shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. (g) There is a minimum lot area of twenty -two thousand five hundred (22,500) square feet and minimum lot dimensions of one hundred fifty (150) feet by one hundred thirty (13 0) feet. (h) A drainage system subject to the approval of the Community Development Department shall be installed. (32) Veterinary Facilities (a) Treatment shall be limited to small household pets unless the facility is conditionally permitted as a rural veterinary facility. (b) In the CCD district, animals shall only be housed overnight if they are undergoing medical treatment or observation. Overnight boarding for non- medical reasons shall be prohibited. (c) The site shall be designed to prevent animal waste from being exposed to stormwater or entering the stormwater system, streams, lakes, or conveyances. If an area is provided for animals walking, it shall not be exposed to stormwater and the waste shall immediately be picked up and disposed of properly. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 353 CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses (3) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 369 Use Types Base Zoning e Conditionally •.. Permitted Permitted • . 5.3 D I Accessory Dwelling Unit p p p p P Accessory Building — P P p P P P P P P P P P P P P P minor 5.3(D)(2) Accessory Building — P P P P P P P C P P P P P P P P major 5.31D1(31 Adult Use — accessory C 5.3(D1(41 Agricultural Buildings IF 5.3(Dl(51 Automated Teller P P P P P P P P Machines (ATMs) 5.3(Dl(61 Automobile Repair — C Major 5.3(Dl(7l Automobile Repair — C Minor 5.3(D)(8l Boarder(s) P P P 5.3 D 9 Bulk Fuel Sales /Storage P P p C C C 5.3 D 10 Cocktail Room (Retail Sales Accessory to Micro- C C C C C C Distillery) L3J D I I) Co- located Wireless Telecommunications C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Antennae 4.13(E) Commercial Canopies P P P P P P P P 5.3(U� 12) Commercial Transmission/ Reception Antennae/ C C C C C C Structures 4.13(D) Donation Drop -off P P Containers 5.3(D)( 13 Drive - Through Services P P P C P P P 5.3(D)(14) Entertainment/Recreation C C C C 5.3(D�( 15) — Outdoor Commercial Fences or Walls P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.3 Greenhouse /Conservatory P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(16) (non - commercial) Heliports W C C C C C 5.3 D 17 Home Occupations p p p p P P p p P P 5.30(18) Indoor Food / P P P P P P P P 5.3(D) 19 Convenience Sales City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 369 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses TABLE 5-4: ACCESSORY USES BY DISTRICT (cont.)— Use Types • Permitted Conditionally I Additional Permitted Interim Permitted • Requirements Indoor Storage P P P P P P 5.3(D)(2U) Incidental Light p p p p p p p P 5.3(D)(21) Manufacturing Machinery /Trucking C 5.3(D)(22) Repair & Sales Office P P P P P P none Off - street Loading Space P P C P P P P P P P 4.9 Off - street Parking P P P p p P P P p p P P p p P p 48 Open Sales P C C C 5.3(D 23) Operation and storage of agricultural vehicles, P 5.30(24) equipment, and machinery Outdoor Sidewalk Sales & p p p p p p p p 5.3(D)(25) Display (businesses) Residential 5.3(D)(25)(a) Outdoor Storage P P P P P P P P P P Industrial 5.3(�(25�(b) Park Facility Buildings & P P P P P P P P P P p p p p p p 5.30(26) Structures (public) Private Amateur Radio P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.13(B) Private Receiving Antennae and Antenna P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.13(C) Support Structures Retail Sales of Goods (as part of an office or P P P P P P C C 5.3(27) 0 industrial use) _ Shelters (Storm or P P P P P P P P P P p p p p p p 5.3(D)(28) Fallout) Sign(s) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(29) Solar Energy System P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P L3 (D 30 Swimming Pool p P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.30(3 I) Taproom (Retail Sales Accessory to Production C C C C C C 5.3(D)(33) Brewery) Large Trash Handling and P P P P P p p p p p p p 5.30(34) Recycling Collection Area Page 370 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses TABLE 5 -4: ACCESSORY USES BY DISTRICT (cont.) Use Types Base Zoning Districts "P" = Permitted "C" = Conditionally A R R R T R R M B B B B C B I I Additional Permitted O "I" = Interim Permitted A 1 2 N 3 4 H 1 2 3 4 D C 1 2 Requirements Wind Energy Conversion Rim I MENNEN s System, Commercial Wind Energy Conversion System, Non-commercial Wireless Telecommunications Support (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses (1) Accessory Dwelling (a) Accessory dwelling units are permitted only on lots with single - family detached dwellings. (b) No more than one accessory dwelling unit per lot is permitted. (c) Detached accessory dwellings shall be architecturally compatible with the principal dwelling. (d) Occupants of accessory dwelling units are limited to the following: (i) Family members of the person occupying the principal structure. Family members include parents, children, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins of an occupant of the primary structure. (ii) Employee of the occupant of the principal structure whose employment is directed to the principal structure and/or the associated land area of the principal structure. (iii) Employee who provides medical and/or personal care services to an occupant of the primary structure. (e) Accessory dwelling units shall be positioned in one of the following locations: (i) Within the principal structure (e.g. a lower level apartment); (ii) Attached to the principal building; (iii) Detached and behind the principal structure as a freestanding building or above a detached outbuilding. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 371 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses (d) Temporary outdoor vehicle storage may be allowed in an outdoor storage area that is no larger than 25 percent of the buildable area of the lot, is located behind the front building line of the principal structure, and is screened with a wooden fence or masonry wall in accordance with Section 4.3, Fences & Walls. (e) The entire site other than that taken up by a building, structure, or plantings shall be surfaced with a material to control dust and drainage which is subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. (f) No conditional use permit shall be granted for an auto repair shop -major located within 300 feet of a residential zone existing at the time the conditional use permit is granted. (8) Automobile Repair -- Minor (a) The use shall be designed to ensure proper functioning of the site as related to vehicle stacking, circulation, and turning movements. (b) Repair of all vehicles shall occur within an enclosed building. Temporary outdoor vehicle storage may be allowed in an outdoor storage area that is no larger than 25 percent of the buildable area of the lot, is located behind the front building line of the principal structure, and is screened with a wooden fence or masonry wall in accordance with Section 4.3, Fences & Walls. (c) Vehicles not being repaired but used as a source of parts shall be prohibited unless fully enclosed within a building or fully screened in accordance with (b) above. (d) Vehicles that are repaired and are awaiting removal shall not be stored or parked for more than 30 consecutive days. In cases where a vehicle is abandoned by its lawful owner before or during the repair process, the vehicle may remain on site as long as is necessary after the 30 day period, provided the owner or operator of the establishment demonstrates steps have been taken to remove the vehicle from the premises using the appropriate legal means. (9) Boarders (a) Within the A -O zoning district, the boarding or renting of rooms shall be limited to two (2) persons per dwelling unit. (b) Within the R -1 zoning district, the boarding or renting of rooms shall be limited to one (1) person per dwelling unit. Page 376 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 8: RULES & DEFINITIONS Section 8.2 Rules of Measurement Subsection (B) Lots The dashed Ines in frgure 8-4 represent the requir&d front yard setbacks. The width of a lot is determirted by a straight firm cannettiog the interwdion Points of the primory front yard setback and the- adjacent side lot lines. In the case of Ewampk "C° " {a corner iot with two front yard setbacks), the width will be measured from the naerawest street lot line, a —o— reWiredfixat yard io*ub (2) General Lot Requirements Figure 8 -5: MeatsuflngWidth Example "X' Example "W' (a) Erection of More Than One Principal Structure on a Platted Lot Whenever any land is subdivided, a building permit for the construction of a building or other principal structure (excluding buildings under common ownership or unified control) shall not be issued unless the land is subdivided in accordance with the procedures and standards of this Ordinance. (b) Lots Divided By Zoning District Lines Whenever a single lot is located within two or more different zoning districts, each portion of that lot shall be subject to all the regulations applicable to the district in which it is located. (3) Required Yards (a) Definitions /Measurement (i) Accessory Structure Yard The minimum yard requirement between a lot line and an allowable accessory structure. Accessory structures may not be placed within front yards or corner side yards. (ii) Building Line (see Figure 8 -3) A line formed by the face of a building which is used to establish the yards around a building or structure. (iii) Build -to Line Example "C A line with which the majority of an exterior wall of a building is required to coincide. (iv) Right -of -Way (ROW) Page 420 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: RULES & DEFINITIONS Section 8.4 Definitions Subsection (B) Lots VEHICLE FUEL SALES: Buildings and premises where gasoline, oils and greases, batteries, tires and automobile accessories may be supplied and dispensed at retail (or in connection with a private operation where the general public is excluded from use of facilities), and where in addition, the following services may be rendered and sales made, and no other: • "Automotive Repair – minor" as defined by this ordinance • Sales of cold drinks, packaged foods, tobacco, and similar convenience goods for filling station customers, as accessory and incidental to principal operation; • Provision of road maps and other informational material to customers; and • Provision of restroom facilities, but not including showers. Uses permissible at a vehicle fuel sales establishment do not include "Automobile Repair – major" as defined by this ordinance, major mechanical and body work, straightening of body parts, painting, welding, storage of automobiles not in operating condition, or other work involving noise, glare, fumes, smoke or other characteristics to an extent greater than normally found in filling stations. Vehicle fuel sales establishments are intended for the servicing and delivery of goods to passenger vehicles and small commercial vehicles. Facilities for sales to large trucks may be included, but shall not include activities that would constitute uses most commonly found at a truck stop, such as showers, truck washes, truck parking or truck storage for more than temporary periods necessary to purchase and pay for retail goods. VEHICLE SALES OR RENTAL: Establishments primarily engaged in the retail sale of new and used —in operating condition — automobiles, noncommercial trucks, motor homes, recreational vehicles or farm machinery; including incidental storage, maintenance, and servicing. VEHICULAR USE AREA LANDSCAPING, INTERIOR: Vegetative material, structures (walls or fences), berms, and associated ground cover located within the interior of a parking lot, or other vehicular use area for the purposes of providing visual relief and heat abatement. [See Section 4.1(F)] VEHICULAR USE AREA LANDSCAPING, PERIMETER: Vegetative material, structures (walls or fences), berms, and associated ground cover located around the perimeter of a parking lot, or other vehicular use area when such areas are adjacent to a street right -of -way or land in a residential district or residentially developed lands, used property for the purposes of screening the vehicular use area from off -site views. [See Section 4.1(F)] VETERINARY FACILITIES – RURAL: An establishment for licensed practitioners engaged in practicing veterinary medicine, dentistry, or surgery for all animals. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 471 CHAPTER 13 "B -3" HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT SECTION: 13 -1: Purpose 13 -2: Permitted Uses 13 -3: Permitted Accessory Uses 13 -4: Conditional Uses 13 -5: Interim Uses 13 -1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the "B -3," highway business, district is to provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. 13 -2: PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in a "B -3" district: [A] All permitted uses as allowed in a B -1 and B -2 district. [B] Auto accessory store. [C] Commercial recreational uses. [D] Motels, motor motels, and hotels provided that the lot area contains not less than five hundred (500) square feet of lot area per unit. [E] Restaurants, cafes, tea rooms, taverns, and off -sale liquor, provided that the use is not located within 300 ft of a residential zone. ( #258, 09/26/94) [F] Private clubs or lodges serving food and beverages with use being restricted to members and their guests. Adequate dining room, kitchen, and bar space must be provided according to standards imposed upon similar unrestricted customer operations. The serving of alcoholic beverages to members and their guests shall be allowed, providing that such service is in compliance with applicable federal, state, and municipal regulations. Offices of such use shall be limited to no more than twenty (20) percent of the gross floor area of the building. [G] Taxi terminals, stand, and offices. [H] Small printing or publishing business employing six (6) or less persons. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 14 "13-4" REGIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SECTION: 14 -1: Purpose 14 -2: Permitted Uses 14 -3: Permitted Accessory Uses 14 -4: Conditional Uses 14 -1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the "B -4," regional business, district is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. 14 -2: PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in a "B -4" district: [A] All permitted uses as allowed in a "B-1 ", "B -2 ", and "B -3" district. [B] Antique or gift shop. [C] Amusement places (such as dance halls or roller rinks). [D] Auto accessory stores. [E] Enclosed boat and marine sales. [F] Books, office supplies, or stationery stores. [G] Bowling alleys. [H] Carpet, rugs, and tile. [I] Coin and philatelic stores. [J] Copy service but not including press or newspaper. [K] Costume, clothes rental. [L] Department and discount stores. [M] Dry cleaning, including plant accessory thereto, pressing, and repairs. [N] Dry goods store. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE [O] Electrical appliance stores, including incidental repair and assembly but not fabricating or manufacturing. [P] Employment agencies. [Q] Finance companies. [R] Furniture stores. [U] Haberdasheries and ladies ready -to -wear. [V] Insurance sales, claims and branch offices. [W] Jewelry stores and watch repair. [X] Leather goods and luggage stores. [Y] Record - music shops. [Z] Restaurants, tea rooms, cafes, taverns, and off -sales liquor stores. [AA] Sewing machine sales and service. [BB] Shoe stores. [CC] Tailor shops. [DD] Theatres not of the outdoor drive -in type. [EE] Toy stores. [FF] Travel bureaus, transportation ticket offices. [GG] Variety stores, 5 & 10 stores, and stores of similar nature. [HH] Wearing apparel. [II] Government and public utility buildings. [JJ] Mortuaries [KK] Body Piercing Establishments [LL] Tattoo Parlors ( #286, 2/10/97)( #330,9/13/99) MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 14 -3: PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted accessory uses in a "B -4" district: [A] All permitted accessory uses in a "B -3" district. 14 -4: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in a "B -4" district: (Requires a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Chapter 22 of this ordinance.) [A] Open and outdoor storage as an accessory use provided that: 1. The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring residential uses or if abutting a residential district in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [G], of this ordinance. 2. Storage is screened from view from the public right -of -way in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [G], of this ordinance. Storage area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. 4. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right -of -way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [H], of this ordinance. 5. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. [B] Open or outdoor service, sale, and rental as a principal and accessory use and including sales in or from motorized vehicles, trailers, or wagons, provided that: 1. Outside service, sales, and equipment rental connected with the principal use is limited to thirty percent (30 %) of the gross floor area of the principal use. This percentage maybe increased as a condition of the conditional use permit. 2. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of the neighboring residential uses or an abutting residential district in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [G], of this ordinance. 3. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE shall not be visible from the public right -of -way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [H], of this ordinance. 4. Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. 5. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. [C] Custom manufacturing, restricted production and repair limited to the following: Art, needlework, jewelry from precious metals, watches, dentures, and optical lenses, provided that: 1. Such use is accessory as defined in Chapter 2, Section 2, of this ordinance to the principal use of the property. 2. Does not conflict with the character of development intended for this district. 3. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are considered satisfactorily met. [D] Motor fuel station, auto repair- minor, and tire and battery stores and service, provided that: 1. Regardless of whether the dispensing, sale, or offering for sale of motor fuels and /or oil is incidental to the conduct of the use or business, the standards and requirements imposed by this ordinance for motor fuel stations shall apply. These standards and requirements are, however, in addition to other requirements which are imposed for other uses of the property. 2. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. 3. The entire site other than that taken up by a building, structure, or plantings shall be surfaced with a material to control dust and drainage which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 4. A minimum lot area of twenty -two thousand five hundred (22,500) square feet and minimum lot dimensions of one hundred fifty (15 0) MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE feet by one hundred thirty (13 0) feet. 5. A drainage system subject to the approval of the City Engineer shall be installed. 6. A curb not less than six (6) inches above grade shall separate the public sidewalk from motor vehicle service areas. 7. The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from the public right -of -way and shall be in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [H], of this ordinance. 8. Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed. 9. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than five (5) feet shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [G], of this ordinance. 10. Each light standard landscaped. 11. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [G], of this ordinance. 12. Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement, shall comply with Chapter 3, Section 5, of this ordinance, and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 13. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be minimized and shall be in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 9, of this ordinance. 14. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. 15. No outside storage except as allowed in compliance with Chapter 13, Section 4, of this ordinance. 16. Sale of products other than those specifically mentioned in Chapter 13, Section 4, be subject to a conditional use permit and be in compliance with Chapter 13, Section 4 [F], of this ordinance. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 17. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served as well or better by modifying the conditions. 18. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. [E] Machinery sales. [F] Commercial planned unit development as regulated by Chapter 20 of this ordinance. [G] Boarding House, provided that: 1. The building /structure is found to be substandard and /or blighted or contributing to blight and in need of substantial rehabilitation. a. The applicant must provide an overall development concept plan. b. The applicant must demonstrate that said rehabilitation is the most feasible use alternative and that said rehabilitation is not remodeling or simple structural alterations to accommodate a change in use. 2. There shall be no less than ten (10) units nor more than 18 units, and each unit shall be of a design considered to be an efficiency apartment. 3. At least one unit shall be on the ground floor fully accessible to handicapped persons. 4. At least 50% of the floor area on the ground floor shall be developed as complete restaurant facilities with a minimum seating capacity of two seats per dwelling unit but in no case less than 25 seats. a. Restaurant shall not be eligible for licenses regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors, non - intoxicating malt liquors, wine, or the display and consumption of liquors. b. The restaurant shall be so equipped to provide food service to the dwelling units if required. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 5. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. 6. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served as well or better by modifying the conditions. ( #138, 7/23/84) MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE Legend N, \ I N, \ I \N, N, \ I Offici I Zoning M P � I \ \ I I \ I I \ \ o I I s I \ \ I \ I I \ � I \ I \ I I I \\ �Q d, I I N \ \ I L Oren `\ �® \\ I I —— — — — — — — — — — — I \ \ Praire Rd \ 3 I \ ®® Hil _ W E \ — I I� \ I \ I \ \ oe le r I 01 BASE ZONING DISTRICTS Residential Districts Business Districts ` \\ 6� Low Residential Densities g -1 Kama " °Sr m ��� �•� A -o g_2 R -A B -3 i R_1 B -4 CCD Medium Residential Densities T -N Industrial Districts R -2 IBC R -PUD 1 -1 1 -2 -- High Residential Densities R -3 --- - - - - -- 01 Swan River -- - - - - -- Monticello /VI_H 02 PUDs L-- - - - - -- High School ---- - - - - -- 03 Mills Fleet Farm OTHER Water 04 ;Red Rooster _ �---- - - - - -, OVERLAY DISTRICTS Performance Based Overlay District Special Use Overlay District Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District Shoreland District �_ - - -� Freeway Bonus Sign District ,�i• �•4 i �( y v _ PIN ��III�► .0 miss NINE m�m� �� X111 NONE No IN MIND oz � /ll► 1 \ ►���1� �C 111 ��I�i111■ ■1111111 I I I m ® ®® I I I � R;yerl ge rry erF t Q 11- 17 - -16 City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 3A. Public Hearing - Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -092 establishing the final tax levy for 2017 (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Council and staff have met several times to discuss the city's proposed 2017 budget and tax levy. As a result, the Council approved a 2017 preliminary city levy of $9,150,000 and an HRA levy of $280,000. Both levies were certified to Wright County for inclusion on the November truth -in- taxation notices. The notices were mailed on November 21st The proposed final city tax levy of $9,150,000 is $225,000 (2.5 %) higher than the 2016 final levy and the proposed final HRA tax levy of $280,000 is unchanged from the prior year. The below graph reflects the levy over the last ten years. Property Tax Levy History 56,eoa,000 7" A ,o $4,000,000 - 2,OC10,O170 2006 2006 201.{ 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2917 ■ city levy ■ HRA Levu The below graph compares the actual levy, a consumer price index (CPI) adjusted levy and population counts. Current year annualized inflation is 1 percent and 2017 inflation is estimated at 1.9 %, the average of the prior 14 years presented on the graph. Taw Levy, CPI and PolprAlat on (2003 -2017) $1i 1510M s 5� $6 1 9,COD $4, s� $2 ..._ 3,000 s - 0 —M—CRI LeYy —4— Actual Levy Povurlatlon City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 The following schedule displays the allocation of the levy over various funds: Current and future debt For initial budgeting purposes, staff used a base city tax levy target of $9,273,000. The base levy represented a $348,000 (3.9 %) increase over the 2016 final levy. The proposed preliminary city levy was pared by Council to $225,000 - $123,000 less than proposed. As a result, the proposed final levy reduces the General Fund portion of the city levy by $23,000 and the 2015/2016/2017 Bonds portion by $100,000 (See Capital Projects - Future Debt in the resolution). The tax capacity rate changes for 2013 -2017 for the three main taxing authorities is as follows: 2014 2015 2016 2017 Property Property Property Property % $$ Fund Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Change Change General Fund $ 5,497,000 $ 5,882,000 $ 6,177,000 $ 6,291,000 1.8% $ 114,000 MCC - Operating 350,000 358,000 364,000 372,000 2.2% 8,000 MCC - Debt 1,040,000 1,005,000 - - - -- - 2014 GO Judgment Bonds - - 544,000 536,929 -1.3% (7,071) 2015/16/17 Bonds" - - 550,000 660,288 20.1% 110,288 2005A/2011A GO IBF 223,000 330,000 330,000 139,783 -57.6% (190,217) 2007A GO IBF 540,000 420,000 420,000 610,000 45.2% 190,000 2008A GO Sewer Refund 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 0.0% - 2010A GO IBF - 40,000 40,000 40,000 0.0% - Total City Levy $ 8,150,000 $ 8,535,000 $ 8,925,000 $ 9,150,000 2.5% $ 225,000 HRA Levy - - 280,000 280,000 0.0% $ - Total Levy $ 8,150,000 $ 8,535,000 $ 9,205,000 $ 9,430,000 2.4 % $ 225,000 Current and future debt For initial budgeting purposes, staff used a base city tax levy target of $9,273,000. The base levy represented a $348,000 (3.9 %) increase over the 2016 final levy. The proposed preliminary city levy was pared by Council to $225,000 - $123,000 less than proposed. As a result, the proposed final levy reduces the General Fund portion of the city levy by $23,000 and the 2015/2016/2017 Bonds portion by $100,000 (See Capital Projects - Future Debt in the resolution). The tax capacity rate changes for 2013 -2017 for the three main taxing authorities is as follows: The nuclear power plant $34M increase in estimated market value along with increases in residential housing values (average 7.5 %) contributed to the drop in the tax capacity rate. In past years, power plant uprates absorbed all of the tax levy increase and some. However, the plant will only pay $49,000 of the $225,000 city levy increase in 2017. The school district levied taxes based on taxable market value and tax capacity. Only the taxes levied on tax capacity are represented by the chart above. iC Rate Change by - 2013 to 2017 x. -0.975 ...� Fl6 -6.5% 1p.[ -15.C% - O% -19.1% - 22.2% -25.0% The nuclear power plant $34M increase in estimated market value along with increases in residential housing values (average 7.5 %) contributed to the drop in the tax capacity rate. In past years, power plant uprates absorbed all of the tax levy increase and some. However, the plant will only pay $49,000 of the $225,000 city levy increase in 2017. The school district levied taxes based on taxable market value and tax capacity. Only the taxes levied on tax capacity are represented by the chart above. City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 Tax capacity values and rates will move in the opposite direction in a relatively stable levy environment. Tax capacity is calculated by multiplying the property's taxable market value by the class rate for a particular property type. For example, most residential property has a class rate of I% and most commercial has a class rate of 2 %. Xcel uprate improvements are responsible for much of the incline in tax market values since 2012. Recovering residential market values contributed to the 2017 tax capacity increase. Tax Cap ac tyrVakies and Tax Capacity Rates $30 $27AM sr."s $29.iAA S� z $20 JLI \Mel - 34.18b rL U � }4 35.552 H $ III $9.6h1 $5 — — Tax Capacity Value -0—Tax Capacity Rate The city of Monticello has the lowest tax capacity rate in Wright County. 80.0 7&0 540 40.0 30.4 x 1= 20.0 1010 0.0 City Tax Rates City of South Hayed C1b of VAMHY tatty 01 Comic City of Ckmirwaf r u City of Hawetd._ City of Mapla Lake C" of AnnanQafa City of fldfala C4 of Rocikford City of Mwit ao" City of Do "vin City of Delano City of Hanover City of Alhar"Ile - City 41 Owego City of 6t. Michael City of Monticalia 00 20.0 40.0 x(10.0 BQ:D 100.4 120.0 140.0 3 City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 Al. Budget Impact: The levy provides significant resources for operations and debt service. The impacts are the levy amounts of $9,150,000 and $280,000. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The budget should serve staff as a guide to expenditure limits for 2017, but has no workload impact. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 -092 establishing the city property tax levy for 2017 at $9,150,000 and the HRA levy for 2017 at $280,000. 2. Motion to adopt a Resolution to establish the property tax levy in the amount of $ , which cannot exceed $9,150,000 and an HRA levy of $ , which cannot exceed $280,000. 3. Motion to not adopt the 2017 tax levy at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #l, which sets the city property tax levy at $9,150,000 and the HRA levy at $280,000. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2016 -092 • PowerPoint presentation to be handed out at the meeting 4 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-092 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 2017 PROPERTY TAX LEVY AND AUTHORIZING CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN DEFERRED TAX LEVIES WHEREAS, the Finance Director has prepared and submitted to the City Council a budget setting forth therein his estimated needs of the City of Monticello for operations, capital improvements and debt service for the fiscal year commencing January 1, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the same and has made such changes therein as appear to be in the best interest of the City of Monticello; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello as follows: SECTION I. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Monticello a direct ad valorem tax collectible in 2017 for the following purposes and in the following amounts: REVENUE NET CERTIFIED LEVY General $ 6,291,000 Community Center $ 372,000 Capital Projects - Future Debt $ 50,000 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS G.O. Bonds, Series 2007A $ 610,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2008B $ 500,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010A $ 40,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2011A $ 139,783 G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A $ - G.O. Bonds, Series 2014A $ 536,929 G.O. Bonds, Series 2015B $ 195,288 G.O. Bonds, Series 2016A $ 415,000 TOTAL TAX LEVY $ 9,150,000 SECTION II. There is hereby levied $280,000 upon all taxable real property within the City of Monticello a special benefit tax, collectible in 2017, under Section 469.033, subd. 6, of the HRA Act (HRA levy): SECTION III. It is hereby determined that sufficient monies are now on hand, or will be when needed, for the payment of principal and interest to come due during the year 2017 for certain bond issues outstanding of the City of Monticello. SECTION III. The Auditor - Treasurer of Wright County is hereby authorized and directed, pursuant to the provisions of Section 475.61, Minnesota Statutes Annotated, to cancel or otherwise amend the levies for said indebtedness heretofore made to be levied in the year 2016 for collection in the year 2017 as follows: Debt Service Levies Bond Resolution 2017 Levy Levy Added Canceled G.O. Bonds, Series 2007A $ 299,456 $ 610,000 $ 310,544 G.O. Bonds, Series 2008B 1,049,265 500,000 549,265 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010A 215,135 40,000 175,135 G.O. Bonds, Series 201 lA 186,990 139,783 (47,207) G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A 68,513 - 68,513 G.O. Bonds, Series 2014A 605,662 536,929 68,733 G.O. Bonds, Series 2015B 195,288 195,288 - G.O. Bonds, Series 2016A 415,000 415,000 Total $ 2,620,309 $ 2,437,000 $ 183,309 SECTION IV. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the Auditor - Treasurer of Wright County, Minnesota. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 12th day of December, 2016. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The above resolution was introduced by Councilmember and was duly seconded by Councilmember The following voting in favor: The following voted in opposition: CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the Monticello City Council at their scheduled meeting on December 12, 2016, and recorded in minutes of said meeting. Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Notary Public: Date: (STAMP) Special City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 4A. Consideration to adopt Ordinance #658 amending the City Fee Schedule for 2017 and adopting Summary Ordinance #658A for publication (JS/WO /JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The fees for services performed by the city are established by ordinance and incorporated into the annual City Fee Schedule. Every year, staff reviews these fees to make sure the fees charged are in line with what the service costs or is necessary to provide the service. Attached is the proposed 2017 fee schedule based on Council and staff review of these fees. Recommended changes to the fees schedule are highlighted, with some including additional notes. Following are a few items with further explanation provided: Cemetery — Both residential and nonresidential plat prices were increased to reflect economic conditions. • Community Center — Community Center rates reflect a change in strategy with the elimination of some ancillary activity charges along with corresponding increases in membership rates. A 5% flat rate increase for legacy rates is proposed. However, staff believes the legacy rates should be eliminated by rolling the lowest tier up each year until everyone is on the same rate schedule. • Community Development /Building — Escrow Chart Escrow Chart - Development & Subdivision Project Review & Inspection fees is refined. • Animal Control — Changes eliminate the altered/unaltered distinction and raise the fee to higher unaltered rate. • Engineering -- Various trunk charges were adjusted upward to reflect the increase in the Engineering Cost Index. • Public Works — Various labor and equipment charges were adjusted to reflect changes in service delivery costs. Some equipment hourly costs were raised to assure the city was not undercutting private service providers. • Sanitary Sewer — Rates were adjusted to accommodate monthly rather than quarterly billing and gallons rather cubic feet. Percentage of increase are noted in the fee schedule. The 2016 rates are still in effect for the last quarterly billing occurring in January 2017. • Water — Rates were adjusted to accommodate monthly rather than quarterly billing and gallons rather cubic feet. Percentage of increase are noted in the fee schedule. The 2016 rates are still in effect for the last quarterly billing occurring in January 2017. Special City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 Al. Budget Impact: The proposed fees would increase budgeted revenues in their respective funds for 2017. There would be a minimal cost to publish a summary of the fee schedule. The full fee schedule will be available on the city's website or can be requested from city hall staff. A2. Staff Workload Impact: This item would have minimal staff workload impact. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Decision 1: 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance #658 approving the 2017 Fee Schedule as submitted, effective January 1, 2016 or as indicated in the Fee Schedule. 2. Motion to adopt Ordinance #658 approving the 2017 Fee Schedule with additional changes as directed by Council: 3. Motion to not adopt the 2017 fee schedule at this time. Decision 2- 1. Motion to adopt Summary Ordinance #658A providing for publication. It should be noted that summary publication requires a 4 /5th super majority vote by Council. 2. Motion to not adopt Summary Ordinance #658A for publication. If a summary ordinance is not adopted, the city is required to publish the full Fee Schedule in the newspaper. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 for each decision. If Council wishes to consider additional changes to the Fee Schedule, those changes would be incorporated into the ordinance accordingly per council direction. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Ordinance #658 Cover Page and Proposed 2017 Fee Schedule B. Summary Ordinance #658A 2 ORDINANCE NO. 658 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2016 TITLE 20 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Title 20 — Fee Schedule shall be amended as shown in the 2017 Fee Schedule in Attachment "A." Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 20 — Fee Schedule, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Monticello City Code as has been adopted. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 12th day of December, 2016. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: ABSENT: ORDINANCE NO. 658 ATTACHMENT "A" 2017 CITY OF MONTICELLO FEE SCHEDULE TITLE 20 - CHAPTER 1 2017 FEE SCHEDULE - CITY OF MONTICELLO Fee Schedule Rates supercede amounts shown in city ordinances or policies which are dated prior to the fee schedule. ANIMAL CONTROL Boarding Fee: Boarding Access Fee Dog License: Altered Pet Unaltered Pet Altered Pet Unaltered Pet Late Fee Replacement Tag Euthanization/Disposal Fee Fine: Running at Large: First offense Second offense Third offense If impounded Permit for Keeping Fowl on Premises Annual renewal for current permit Permit for Keeping Honeybees on Premises Annual Renewal of Permit CEMETERY $16 /per day + tax $75 $250 per entity $100 $15 - 2 years $175 Frost Charge: (excavations December through March) Eliminate Altered/Unaltered and charge $20 - 2 years $20 for all dogs (2 years). $8.00 - 1 year $400 Weekend Eliminate Altered/Unaltered and charge $10 - 1 year $10 for all dogs (1 year). $5 $125 $2+ tax $80 $40 per animal + tax $40 Licensed Unlicensed $25 $35 $35 $45 $50 $60 Add boarding fee (plus tax) $50 $25 $50 $25 Administrative Fee: $75 Cremation Disinterment $100 Flat Marker setting with 4" concrete border $175 Frost Charge: (excavations December through March) $100 Grave Excavation Fee: $325 Weekday $400 Weekend $450 Infant Grave Excavation - Weekday $100 Infant Grave Excavation - Weekend $125 Cremation Grave Excavation - Weekday $80 Cremation Grave Excavation - Weekend $105 Grave Purchasing Fee: Resident Full Grave (4'x12') Flush Marker Area $950 Full Grave (4'x12') Raised Marker Area $1,050 Infant Grave (2'x6') $300 Cremation Crave (4'x4') $525 Grave Staking Fee (monument or excavation): $55 Grave Transfer Fee: $15 Non - Resident Resident Non - Resident $1,150 $1,000 $1,200 $1,250 $1,100 $1,300 $325 $325 $350 $625 $550 $650 $60 Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 1 Memorial Plaque (Bronze) Stone: Cost + $10 + sales tax Opening and closing of Niche: $55 $60 Perpetual Care Fee: New Grave Sales Included in grave price (Maint. not taxable - Plant Care taxable) Grave Sold Pre -1960 $100 Plant stand $35 (includes tax) COMMUNITY CENTER Membership Fees: (for new members) Resident Rate Regular Rate Daily Pass Junior /Senior $5.50 $6.50 No Change Adult $6.50 $7.50 No Change Family $24 $27.50 Remove Rate *Climbing is ineluded Daily Pass. Remove wa4l fiet with 3 Month Membership Junior /Senior $76,$79 $93, $96 3% Increase Adult $104, $111 $127, $135 6% Increase Dual Senior $122, $130 $150, $159 6% Increase Family $177, $195 $200, $220 10% Increase Dual Adult $177 $200 New Rate Annual Membership (Paid in full Options) Junior /Senior $208, $215 $277, $286 3% Increase Adult $277, $294 $358, $380 6% Increase Dual Senior $335, $355 $446, $455 6% Increase Family $454, $499 $541, $595 10% Increase Dual Adult $454 $550 New Rate Continuous Membership (Monthly Payment Option ") Junior /Senior $20, $21 $26, $27 3% Increase Adult $29.5, $32 $35, $37 6% Increase Dual Senior $32.5, $35 $42, $45 6% Increase Family $46, $51 $50, $55 10% Increase Dual Adult $46 $50 New Rate * *Automatic Withdrawal Cancellation fee applies ifwithin 12 months ofjoining. $50.00 Cancellation Fee Childcare - option with Membership $8 /month for each child No Change c t ` Ma fi., Pe f .., fse Remove Rate All current MCC members, including charter members, will see an increase of 5% on their membership fees. Corporate Memberships (Quarterly Rate) JR/SR ADULT FAMILY Level 1 $ 51.00 $ 68.00 $ 111.25 No Change Level 2 $ 50.00 $ 66.50 $ 109.00 No Change Level 3 $ 49.00 $ 65.00 $ 106.75 No Change Level 4 $ 48.00 $ 63.50 $ 104.50 No Change Level 5 $ 47.00 $ 62.50 $ 102.25 No Change Special Passes: Resident Rate Regular Rate Climbing Pass (5 uses) — $-3 Remove Rate Splash Pass (10 uses) - Junior $46 $46 Remove Rate Splash Pass (10 uses) - Adult $46 $5238 Remove Rate Indoor Play Pass (10 uses) $24- $31.50 Remove Rate Court Pass - Gymnasium (10 uses) - Junior $33 $40 Remove Rate Court Pass - Gymnasium (10 uses) - Adult $40 $46 Remove Rate Group X Class Pass (10 uses) $55, $90 $75, $110 Daily Pass (10 visits) $60 $70 New Rate Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 2 Special Rates Climbing Wall Daily Fee Junior $5:50 Remove Rate Climbing Wall Daily Fee Adult — $630 Remove Rate Indoor Play Area $2.75, $3.50 $3.75, $4.75 Public Skate - Children 5 -17 -- $3 No Change Public Skate - Adult -- $4 No Change Twilight Swim Rates - Junior /Adult -- $4 Name Change to Rate Group Rates - Junior -- $5 No Change Group Rates - Adult -- $6 No Change Shower Only -- $3.50 No Change Group X Class Drop -In $6.5, $12 $9, $15 No Change Silver Sneakers Drop -In -- $4, $8 Piekle Ball Ire -- Remove Rate Contact Community Center for rates on Birthday Parties, Swim Lessons, and Corporate Memberships Regular Gymnasium Rental Rates: Gym - prime time $58/hour No Change Gym - non prime time $40/hour No Change Full Kitchen $91/hour No Change Energy Fee $83/hour No Change Early set up fee $57/hour No Change Damage Deposit 1/2 of rental fees No Change Hourly Room Rental Rates (2 hour minimum required): Resident Regular Non -Profit Boom Island Room $16 $18 $14 No Change Bridge Room (full) $24 $29 $21 No Change N. or S. Bridge Room $15 $17 $12 No Change River Room $12 $16 $10 No Change Warehouse Room - Weekday $28 $33 $21 No Change Warehouse Room - Weekend $33 $40 $28 No Change Mississippi Room: Private Resident Private Regular Business Resident Business Regular Half Room Rental $52 $63 $40 $57 Full Room Rental $73 $88 $61 $80 Rental event with alcohol (not weddings): Resident Regular Organization (2 hour minimum - reserve within 3 months of event) $152 per hour $166 per hour $140 per hour Hostess Fee: $25/hour Locker fees: $5a..,....h pet! locker $10 per month per locker COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING County Assessor Fees: Building Valuation $499,999 or less Building Valuation $500,000 or more Building Inspection (non - permit related): Building Permit Fees: Building Permit Surcharge: Contractor License Check Fee: Building Permit/Records - Duplicate Blight Processing Fee Demolition Permit: $25 $100 $55/hour $12.50 minimum charge for 15 minutes or less 106% of 1997 State recommended schedule use state - mandated fee $30 $55/hour $12.50 minimum charge for 15 minutes or less $55 (per parcel) 106% of 1997 State recommended schedule Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 3 Permit is issued under a bldg permit (follow same procedures as issuing a building permit). Prior to demolition permit issuance verify with Public Works. Contractor must arrange disconnection: 1) Sanitary sewer; 2) City water & retrieve water mater and 3) approve routing for trucks and heavy equipment, (if applicable). Excavation permit may also be required. Fire Alarm/Fire Sprinkler System 106% of 1997 State Recommended Schedule Master Plan Review: 25% of building permit fee Mechanical Permits: Residential $45 base + $9 /fixture + state surcharge Commercial 1.25% of valuation + state surcharge Mobile Home Permit $180 Moving Buildings: $150 + expense + demolition permit Plan Review: 65% of building permit fee Plumbing Permits: Residential $45 base + $9 /fixture ( "Fixture" includes such things as traps, toilets, floor drains, sinks, showers) Commercial 1.25% of valuation + state surcharge Plumbing Surcharge: Rental Housing License Fee: $45 /per building + $15 for each dwelling unit within the building Rental Housing License Application/Late Fee: Double the standard license fee Rental Housing License Transfer Fee: $35 Residential Building Escrow: $2,000 (Held for completion of as -built survey, individual lot landscaping. Also secures street sweeping, lot erosion control and any damage to public improvements) Sign Permits: Permanent $50 for first $1,000 of value (minimum fee $50) $10 each additional $1,000 of value Sign Permits: Temporary $50 State Surcharge on Building Permits: Valuation of Structure Addition or Alteration Surcharge Computation $1,000,000 or less .0005 x valuation $1,000,000 to $2,000,000 $500 +.0004 x (Value - $1,000,000) $2,000,000 to $3,000,000 $900 +.0003 x (Value - $2,000,000) $3,000,000 to $4,000,000 $1200 +.0002 x (Value - $3,000,000) $4,000,000 to $5,000,000 $1400 +.0001 x (Value - $4,000,000) Greater than $5,000,000 $1500 +.00005 x (Value - $5,000,000) Surveys: $12 Utility Locate Fee: Residential $45 Commercial/Industrial $60 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING /ZONING Administrative Home Occupation Permit Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Escrow Chart - Land Use Application Plan Review $50 $200 + escrow (per chart) $200 + Escrow (per chart) Commercial Residential 0 -3 acres $2,000 1 unit $500 (single family) 4 -10 acres $6,000 2+ units $1000 base+ $100 per unit 11+ acres $10,000 *reconciled to actual costs for staff /consulting time after decision Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 Escrow Chart - Development & Subdivision Project Review & Inspection Interim Use Permit: Labor (for Community Development/Projects): Planner Engineer Construction Inspector Landscaping Security Park Dedication (residential) Parking Fund (CCD District) Plat Subdivisions: Preliminary Plat Final Plat Planned Unit Developments (PUDs): Public ROW or Easement Vacation Rezoning Request: Simple Subdivision/Administrative Lot Combination/ Lot Line Adjustment Site nia Review Wetland Delineation Review Special Home Occupation Permits: Special Planning Commission Meeting Temporary Use Permit (waived for parades only) Planning Review & Adminiitration Legal Review & Adminsitration City Review & Administration Engineering Review & Inspection Grading Streets & Utilties Iron Monuments $300/lot $200 + Escrow (per chart) $155/hour $147/hour (maximum) $105/hour (maximum) $2% of estimated public improvement cost or $2,000 minimum, whichever is greater. $2% of estimated public improvement cost or $2,000 minimum, whichever is greater. $2% of estimated public improvement cost or $2,000 minimum, whichever is greater. $2% of estimated public improvement cost or $2,000 minimum, whichever is greater. $2% of estimated public improvement cost or $2,000 minimum, whichever is greater. $160 $152 $110 Letter of credit or cash based on statement of value of landscaping x 125 %. For new subdivisions, $200 per required blvd tree + individual lot planting security per above An amount of land equal to eleven percent (11 %) of the total gross land area of the plat shall be presumptively defined as "reasonably commensurate." In the event that the subdivider objects to the eleven percent (11 %) standard, the City shall, at the developer's request and expense, conduct a specific dedication study of the park system and the demand placed on the system by the proposed plat. Cash -in -Lieu: 11% of fair market value of the raw land to be platted at the time of final plat. The city may require an appraisal to determine market value of subject land being platted. $4,500 per stall $300 + escrow (per chart) $50 + escrow (per chart) Concept: $200 + escrow (per chart) Development: $200 + escrow (per chart) Final: $50 + escrow (per chart) $200 + Escrow (per chart) $200 + Escrow (per chart) $200 + Escrow (per chart) $50 application fee /$500 escrow $200 + Escrow (per chart) $350 $50 Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 Eliminate Add Variance: Single Family - Aplication Fee $200 - Deposit $500 All Other Applications - Application Fee $200 - Deposit $1,000 NOTE: When multiple land use applications are run concurrently, only one application fee and escrow deposit shall be required per meeting cycle, until escrow is depleted. New escrow required per escrow chart once depleted. ENGINEERING Driveway Permit GPS Locate Fee (New subdivisions) Grading Permit: Existing Single - Family Residential New Single- Family Residential Development, Multi- Dwelling, Commercial & Industrial Properties Land Reclamation/Mining Permit (requires subdivision development agreement or CUP) Public Improvement Security $30 $30 $60 /unit Add $75 per permit + $1,500 /acre restoration surety bond. No drainage calculation review required: $150 per permit plus restoration surety bond of $3000 /first acre; $1500 each additional acre. Drainage calculation review required: $350 per permit plus restoration surety bond of $3000 /first acre; $1500 each additional acre. Fee determined by City Council resolution + 100% of land restoration costs as determined by City Engineer Letter of credit or cash based on statement of construction cost of improvements x 125% Right -of -Way Permits Drops - no drawing required unless origination occurs more than 10 feet from property to be served: Fee w /out drawings $30/25 addresses (maximum) Fee with drawings $30/5 addresses with drawings (maximum) Permit Extension Fee: $20.00 Pavement Hole Fee: $55 Trunk Line Fee: Base Fee (first 100 feet) $45 Trenching (over 100 feet) $.10 /lineal foot Boring (over 100 feet) $.05 /lineal foot Obstruction Fee: $45 Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 FIRE DEPARTMENT Controlled/Prescribed Burns: Building Prairie or Wildland, less than 20 acres Prairie or Wildland, 20 acres or more Emergency Response - Incident Non - resident FalseAlarm Policy* - First Time Second Time Third Time or More * Per calendar year Fire Lock Box Fee: Home Fire Safety Inspections (i.e. daycare /foster care) LICENSES /PERMITS Burning Permit: (to cover expenses, if PW/Fire Dept are called to burn site) Cigarette License: Gambling License: Liquor Administrative Fines: First violation Second violation, within 2 years Third violation, within 2 years Liquor Licenses: 1 -Day Consumption & Display Temporary On -Sale (Beer) Wine, On -Sale Wine /Strong Beer Comb. On -Sale Wine /3.2 Beer Com. On -Sale 3.2 Beer, On -Sale 3.2 Beer, Off -Sale Liquor, On -Sale Liquor, Sunday Sales Liquor, Setups Liquor,Club (Veteran's Org). Membership 200 or less 201 -500 501 -1000 1001 -2000 2001 -4000 Over 4000 Brew Pub Off -Sale Brewer Taproom Microdistillery $2,500 $750/hour $1,000/hour Added verbaige, charge remains the same $500 plus reimbursable expenses at cost No charge $250 $350 Cost+ 10 %+ sales tax $50 $250 deposit Tobacco licenses are issued by Wright County Licensed through State of Minnesota; Requires Council approval $500 $1,000 $2,000 (no mandatory revocation of license) $25 $10 /day $275 /per year $1,200 /per year $500 /per year $275 /year $100 /per year $3,750 /per year $200 (Statutory limit) $250 /year $300 (Statutory limit) $500 (Statutory limit) $650 (Statutory limit) $800 (Statutory limit) $1,000 (Statutory limit) $2,000 (Statutory limit) $200 /per year $500 /per year $500 /per year Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 7 Pawn Shop: Annual license, initial Annual renewal of current license Transaction fee Peddler /Solicitor Permit: Peddler Merchant/Business Application Peddler Merchant Permit - per day /per person Therapeutic Massage License Massage Enterprise License Massage Therapist License Background Investigation Fee Transient Merchant: Annual permit, private premise Daily Fees, operating under annual permit Daily fees, independent merchant Daily fees, farm/garden fruits & vegetables Fireworks Sale Traveling Shows MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Assessment/Property Search - full Property Bill Search - limited Business List Brochures: City resident list: (Ex. Utility Billing List) City Labels Comprehensive Guide Plan - Entire Downtown Revitalization Plan Transportation Plan Copies: copy machine engineering copier emailed electronic media Delinquent Certification Processing Fee: Minimum Account Balance of $50 Processed once a year Delinquent List Deposits on City Repair Projects Maps: City map (24" X 36 ") City map (11" X 17 ") Zoning map (24" X 36 ") State maps Wright County maps $50 $25 $1.00 per transaction No eharge City residen"usiness (must register-) $25 $25 $100 /per year $50 /per year $25 $75 /year $10 /day (with annual permit) $50 /day No fee from 6/15 to 9/15 (state mandated) $350 /year $100 /first day; $50 /day for each day thereafter $30 Free Free Free $0.25 /page + sales tax $.50 /sheet + sales tax $32 plus tax $15 plus tax $50 plus tax $.25 per copy + sales tax $.50 /square foot + sales tax ($2 minimum) $35.00/hour + sales tax (minimum 1/4 hour) $10.00 + cost of media + sales tax $75 per parcel $10 + tax (each) $100 -$300 (depending on est. value of work) $3 + sales tax $1 + sales tax $3 + sales tax $.55 + sales tax $3 + sales tax Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 8 Notary: Signs Commerical, non -city initiated proclamations City Ordinances: Entire set of ordinances Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance City Code Sanitary Sewer Assessment Policy City Maps Meeting Agendas/Minutes PARKS Memorials: Bench Tree $3 each Current listed price + 10% handling charge + tax $50 Add To obtain paper copies, contact City Hall. Charges based on prices listed under "Copies." $1,500 (includes tax, delivery, installation) $300 (includes tax, delivery, installation) Facility Rental Fees: Baseball/Softball Field Rental* (no lights) Residents $25 per field per day Non - resident $35 per field per day Field Lighting* Residents $15 per hour per field Non - resident $20 per hour per field *these fees we for individuals /groups to use the city facility for practice or an infortnal game. Tournament Field Rental (includes lights as needed) up to 3 days $90 per field extended days $10 per field for each additional day Annual Park Event Photographer Permit TBD Discussed at a later date. Park Rental Rates: Resident Non - Resident Ellison Gazebo $100 $125 Ellison Log Shelter $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs West Bridge Park Shelter/Warming House $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs West Bridge Picnic Shelter $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs Pioneer Park $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs Groveland Park Picnic Shelter $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs Otter Creek $50 for 6 hrs $75 for 6 hrs East Bridge Wedding Gazebo $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs PUBLIC WORKS Disease Replacement Tree Chipping: if City is contracted for tree removal, the City will pay 1,2 the eest of feffieval tip to S225 pef tfee, with resident responsible for the balanee. $30 maximum eredit eaeh $50 per property $50 + tax per 1/2 hour or part thereof for the first 2 hours $80 + tax per 1/2 hour or part thereof for the next hour No more than 3 hours per year per property Cone Replacement: Cost + $10 + sales tax Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 $55 $85 9 Construction Inspection (City or Engineer) Labor (no equipment): Rodding: Sidewalk Snow & Ice Control Sweeping: $105/hour $110 $60.00/hour - regular business hours $65 Rate will be increased if response required outside of regular hours $230/hour for one operator & machine $115/hour or part thereof for 2 operators, machine and pickup $50.00 per lot - 1 st Offence $75.00 per lot - 2nd Offence $100.00 per lot - maximum after 2nd Offence $100.00 Mobilization Charge per Offence at Staff Discretion $125/hour - includes operator $150 Utility Excavation Permit Fee (water, wastewater, stormwater) $105 (Bonding and Insurance required) Vac /Sewer Jet: $287.50/hour for one operator & machine $290 $345/hour for two operators & machine $350 Other Equipment (including operator): $8.050 6.44 % Large Front End Loaders $150/hour $175 Mid Size Loaders $100/hour $125 Backhoe Loader $150/hour $150 Motor Grader $150/hour $175 Skid Steere $100/hour $125 Dump Truck $100/hour $125 Pickup or I -ton Truck $60/hour $75 SANITARY SEWER Sewer Rates: 1st 1,000 gallons Over 1,000 gallons Sewer Rates: Special Cases Industrial Sewer Rates: All Usage (effective July 1, 2017) BOD5: TSS: Testing Sewer Discharge Environmental Fee (all sewer customers): Sewer and Water Combination Permit: Sewer Access Charge: Residential - Single Family All others per unit equivalent Trunk Sanitary Sewer: Residential Unit Non - Residential Waste Water Discharge Permit: 10,000 to 15,000 GPD 15,001 to 25,000 GPD 25,001 to 50,000 GPD 50,001 to 100,000 GPD over 100,000 GPD $7.563 minimum $8.050 6.44 % $5.307/1,000 gallons $5.480 3.26% $28.28 X number of people in household $9.80 per month per person $3.1925/1,000 gallons + sales tax $3.298 3.30% $0.344/lb. + sales tax $0.355 3.20% $0.474/lb. + sales tax $0.489 3.16% Actual costs + 10% 2% of sewer bill $127 (residential) $127 plus tax (commercial) $4,190 /unit $4,190 /unit $1,323 /unit $1,376 4.0% $3,316 /acre $3,449 4.0% $50 annually $100 annually $150 annually $250 annually $300 annually Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 10 STORM SEWER Trunk Storm Sewer Fees: $3,543 (net acre) $3,685 4.0% Alternate Pending Area - Residential $3,630 per acre $3,775 4.0% Alternate Pending Area - Commercial $7,277 per acre $7,568 4.0% Alternate Pending Area - Industrial $8,503 per acre $8,843 4.0% WASTE ITEMS Garbage Service Fees - Apts: w/o dumpsters Pickup Disposal $30.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per quarter $10.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per monthly Disposal Surcharge $9.00 x # units (non- taxable) per quarter $3.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per monthly Garbage Service Fees - Commercial Residential & Non - Commercial Residential (and additional carts): 60 gallon: Pickup Disposal $24.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per quarter $8.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per monthly Disposal Surcharge $6.00 x # units (non - taxable) per quarter $2.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per monthly 90 gallon: Pickup Disposal $30.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per quarter $10.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per monthly Disposal Surcharge $9.00 x # units (non - taxable) per quarter $3.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per monthly Cart Transfer Fee Garbage Cart Replacement (if lost, stolen or destroyed): 38 gallon 60 gallon 90 gallon Recycle Cart Replacement (if lost, stolen or destroyed): 35 gallon 64 gallon 90 gallon Recycle Additional cart pickup Storage Bins (red, yellow, blue) WATER Hydrant Rates for Contractors: ( #1, #2 and #3 ARE ALL TAXABLE IF COMMERCIAL) $30 $59.06 + 9.75% tax Cost + tax + $10.00 $65.31 + 9.75% tax Cost + tax + $10.00 $70.75 + 9.75% tax Cost + tax + $10.00 $60 $65 No charge for now. Cost + tax + $10.00 Cost + tax + $10.00 Cost + tax + $10.00 $10 includes sales tax (until sold out) 1. All contractors must obtain a permit from the Water Superintendent. The permit fee is $500. This permit will define the hydrant to be used and provides a tally sheet for water usage. 2. The following rates shall apply: Up to 3,000 gallons Over 3,000 gallons $35 minimum $3.86/1,000 gallons 3. The following deposits shall be taken for use of City equipment (no exceptions): Hydrant Wrench $50.00 2 -1/2" fill hose $100.00 1 -1/2" fill hose with 2 -1/2" adapter $100.00 2 -1/2" hydrant meter $1,000.00 3/4" and small meter $100.00 Nozzle $50.00 *If equipment is returned within 10 days of permit expiration in good condition, the full amount for water use and equipment, less 10% per month on portion thereof for rent, shall be refunded. Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 11 Industrial Water Rate, Mtr 1 (effective July 1, 2017) All usage $1.9385/1,000 gallons + sales tax Irrigation Water Rate - Resid, Twnhms & Comm: 1.631016043 first 1,000 gallons $6.283 minimum + sales tax 1,001- 10,000 gallons $1.631/1,000 gallons + sales tax 10,001- 33,000 gallons $1.885/1,000 gallons + sales tax over 33,000 gallons $2.045/1,000 gallons + sales tax (if metered separately, no quarterly minimum base rate is applied to irrigation meters with zero usage) Final Bill Processing Fee $20 Manual meter reading (per month for customers refusing radio reading equipment) Delinquent sprinkling meter turn -off Delinquent sprinkling meter turn -on Res /Comm Water: 0 -1,000 gallons first 1,000 gallons 1,001- 10,000 gallons 10,001- 33,000 gallons over 33,000 gallons Minimum Bill for Malfunctioning Meter Trunk Water Charge: Water Access Charge: V line 1 -1/4" line 1 -1/2" line 2" line 3" line 4" line 6" line 8" line Water Availability Charge: (For those who have city water available but choose not to hook up) Water Main Tapping - New Services (1" only) Water Meters: 5/8" meter 3/4" meter 1" meter 1 1/2" meter 2" meter + up 1 "x3/4" meter valves 1 "x1" meter valves Water Shut Off, then Tinned On: Water Violations (sprinkling): 1st Violation 2nd Violation Each Subsequent Violation $20 Add $25 Add $25 Add $6.283 minimum $1.631/1,000 gallons $1.885/1,000 gallons $2.045/1,000 gallons $150 after 3rd contact attempt. $981 /residential unit $2,452 /acre non - residential $833 + materials $1,266 + materials $1,518 +materials $1,997 + materials $2,498 + materials $3,291 +materials $4,143 + materials $5,440 + materials $40.25 (billed in July) $250 each + materials $355 + sales tax $390 + sales tax $490 + sales tax $790 + sales tax Cost + $50 + sales tax $55 + sales tax $60 + sales tax $1.990 2.66% $6.450 2.66% 2.66% $1.660 $1.920 1.78% $1.920 2.15% 1.86% $2.090 $2,550 2.15% $6.450 2.66% $1.660 1.78% $1.920 1.86% $2.090 2.15% $1,020 4.0% $2,550 4.0% $50.00 ($25 on/$25off) + delinquency (taxable if non -res.) No Fee $50 $100 /per violation Proposed Fee Schedule 2017 12 SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 658A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2017 FEE SCHEDULE TITLE 20 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on December 12, 2016, Ordinance No. 658 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 658, the following Summary Ordinance No. 658A has been prepared for publication as authorized by state law. The ordinance adopted by the Council establishes the 2017 Fee Schedule for the City of Monticello, also known as Title 20 of the Monticello City Code. The general purpose of the ordinance is to adopt fees for services provided by the City of Monticello with changes in the following sections: Animal Control Cemetery Community Center Community Development — Planning/Zoning Engineering FiberNet Fire Department Licenses/Permits Miscellaneous Items Public Works Sanitary Sewer Water A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. The complete ordinance will be posted on the City's website following publication. APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, this 12th day of December, 2016. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: ABSENT: 4B. City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -093 approving 2017 Budget (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council and staff met several times to discuss the proposed 2017 budget and tax levy. As a result, the Council approved a 2017 preliminary city levy of $9,150,000, which was certified to Wright County for the tax notices mailed in November. The 2017 proposed final city levy is $225,000 (or 2.5 %) more than the 2016 adopted levy. The 2017 proposed final HRA levy is the same as the prior year at $280,000. For all budgeted funds, 2017 proposed expenditures and other uses total $35,027,394 and 2017 proposed revenues and other sources total $32,714,388. The difference between expenditures and other uses and revenues and other sources is either an addition to or subtraction from fund reserves. Fiscal Year 2017 Projected Beginning Projected Ending Fund Balance/ Estimated Fund Balance/ Working Capital Revenues Appropriations Working Capital General Fund $ 4,986,796 $ 7,802,000 $ 7,802,000 $ 4,986,796 Special Revenue Funds 3,877,184 1,283,499 1,246,254 3,914,429 Economic Development 6,804,362 1,050,814 805,865 7,049,311 Cemetery 33,651 27,325 27,325 33,651 Minnesota Investment 1,145,404 20,000 - 1,165,404 Monticello Community Center 629,448 1,866,400 1,866,400 629,448 Total Special Revenue Funds 8,612,865 2,964,539 2,699,590 8,877,814 Debt Service Funds 3,877,184 1,283,499 1,246,254 3,914,429 2007A G.O. Improvement Bond (176,207) 714,088 536,000 1,881 2008B G.O. Sewer Refunding 1,051,562 505,000 1,521,832 34,730 2010A G.O. Improvement Bond 1,015,837 219,005 305,117 929,725 2011A G.O. Refunding Bond 1,470,836 979,418 784,150 1,666,104 2014A G.O. Judgment Bonds 36,988 537,929 511,862 63,055 2015B G.O. Street/Improvement 61,197 222,288 208,000 75,485 2016A G.O. Street/Improvement - 555,000 530,000 25,000 Total Debt Service Funds 3,460,213 3,732,728 4,396,961 2,795,980 I Capital Project Funds 3,877,184 1,283,499 1,246,254 3,914,429 Capital Project 3,466,818 5,336,000 6,800,000 2,002,818 Closed Bond Fund 234,527 70,900 - 305,427 Park & Pathway Dedication 648,660 2,000 288,000 362,660 StormwaterAccess 735,106 65,000 268,376 531,730 Street Lighting Improvement 746,660 90,000 _ 75,000 761,660 Street Construction 1,755,335 25,000 45,693 1,734,642 Total Canital Project Funds 7.587.106 5.588.900 7.477.069 5.698.937 Enterprise Funds Water 3,877,184 1,283,499 1,246,254 3,914,429 Sewage 2,150,145 2,918,342 3,045,242 2,023,245 Liquor 1,151,487 5,440,194 5,208,603 1,383,078 Deputy Registrar 649,669 476,100 383,936 741,833 Fiber Optics 137,149 1,997,867 1,957,709 177,307 Total Enterprise Funds 7,965,634 12,116,002 11,841,744 8,239,892 Internal Service Funds IT Services 119,501 274,519 298,980 95,040 Central Equipment 500,141 215,700 511,050 204,791 Benefit Accrual 235,733 20,000 - 255,733 Total Internal Service Funds 855.375 510.219 810.030 555.564 City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 The council is not being asked to approve a capital improvement program, which is provided as a reference for future dialogue. Al. Budget Impact: Noted above. The city property tax levy is set at $9,150,000 and the HRA tax levy is set at $280,000 in this budget. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The budget should serve staff as a guide to expenditure limits for 2017, but has no workload impact. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 -093 approving the 2017 expenditure budget at $35,027,394. 2. Motion to adopt a Resolution to approve the 2017 expenditure budget with modification to funds: Fund for 3. Motion not to approve the 2017 expenditure budget and to call for a special meeting to approve the budget prior to December 31St C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1, to adopt the resolution approving the 2017 expenditure budget for all funds at $35,027,394. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution #2016 -093 B. Summary budget for each fund C. General Fund Summary D. Capital Improvement Plan E. FiberNet Budget F. PowerPoint presentation to be handed out at the meeting. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -093 ADOPTING THE 2017 BUDGET AND AUTHORIZING SPECIFIC FINANCE - RELATED ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, the budget is the fiscal blue print for the entire year where the City Council has considered and incorporated all foreseeable spending plans for 2017; and WHEREAS, the City, through sound fiscal policy, establishes that current revenues will be used to finance current expenditures and regularly- occurring capital expenditures; and WHEREAS, the City Council shall by this resolution set forth the total expenditures and uses, excluding depreciation, and the total revenues and other sources for each budgeted fund. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello the following is hereby approved: SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF ESTIMATED REVENUES FROM ALL SOURCES, APPROPRIATIONS, AND FUND BALANCE ADDED (EXPENDED): Revenues Expenditures Fund Balance Fund 2017 Budget 2017 Budget Added (Expended) General Fund $ 7,802,000 $ 7,802,000 $ - Special Revenue Funds Economic Development 1,050,814 805,865 244,949 Cemetery 27,325 27,325 - Minnesota Investment 20,000 - 20,000 Monticello Community Center 1,866,400 1,866,400 - Total Special Revenue Funds 2,964,539 2,699,590 264,949 Debt Service Funds 2007A G.O. Improvement Bond 714,088 536,000 178,088 2008A G.O. Sewer Refunding 505,000 1,521,832 (1,016,832) 2010A G. O. Improvement Bond 219,005 305,117 (86,112) 2011A G.O. Refunding Bond 979,418 784,150 195,268 2014A G.O. Judgment Bond 537,929 511,862 26,067 2015B G.O. Bonds 222,288 208,000 14,288 2016A G.O. Bonds 555,000 530,000 25,000 Total Debt Service Funds 3,732,728 4,396,961 (664,233) Capital Project Funds Capital Project 5,336,000 6,800,000 (1,464,000) Closed Bond Fund 70,900 - 70,900 Park & Pathway Dedication 2,000 288,000 (286,000) Stormwater Access 65,000 268,376 (203,376) Street Lighting Improvement 90,000 75,000 15,000 Street Construction 25,000 45,693 (20,693) Total Capital Project Funds 5,588,900 7,477,069 (1,888,169) Enterprise Funds Water 1,283,499 1,246,254 37,245 Sewage 2,918,342 3,045,242 (126,900) Liquor 5,440,194 5,208,603 231,591 Deputy Registrar 476,100 383,936 92,164 Fiber Optics 1,997,867 1,957,709 40,158 Total Enterprise Funds 12,116,002 11,841,744 274,258 Internal Service Funds IT Services 274,519 298,980 (24,461) Benefit Accrual 20,000 - 20,000 Central Equipment 215,700 511,050 (295,350) Total Internal Service Funds 510,219 810,030 (299,811) Total All Funds $ 32,714,388 $ 35,027,394 $ (2,313,006) SECTION 2. TRANSFERS: By resolution, the Council can amend or rescind this section as the year progresses. The following list does not include any transfers for projects that have not received formal council authorization. a. To 2011A GO Improvement Bond Fund from Storm Water Access Fund - $268,376 and EDA/TIF - $200,000 (Total - $468,376). b. To 2010A GO Improvement Bond Fund from Sewage Fund - $85,293 and Street Reconstruction Fund $45,693 (Total - $130,980). c. To FiberNet Fund from Liquor Fund - $230,000. SECTION 3. CAPITAL EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION: a. Appropriates resources for Central Equipment Fund purchases: Streets - speed trailer ($14,000), black -top roller ($30,000), street sweeper ($190,000), electronic sign reader ($12,000), V -box sander ($15,000); Parks — 72" Polar Trac ($50,000). b. No equipment or construction project purchase /acquisition is specifically approved by this section. SECTION 5. OTHER BUDGET AUTHORIZING ACTIONS: a. Removes prior commitments and assignments, except those required by GASB, from fund balance classifications. b. Approves Senior Center annual subsidy of $58,560. c. Approves a 2% wage adjustment to full -time, part -time (excluding MCC staff and volunteer fire personnel) and seasonal employees for the pay period commencing on first pay period beginning in January 2017 and an additional 1 % commencing on first pay period beginning in July 2017. d. Establishes the monthly standard health insurance benefits at $1,117.55 with an effective date of March 1. Premium contributions are required from family /dependent plan participants for the difference between the standard benefit and coverage costs. No contribution is required from single -plan and non -plan participants. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 12th day of December, 2016. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund GENERAL FUND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ 5,580,437 $ 5,507,285 $ 5,887,666 $ 6,177,000 $ 6,177,000 $ 6,291,000 1.8% Tax Increments - - - - -- Franchise & Other Taxes 241,664 237,173 235,089 283,900 283,900 283,900 0.0% Licenses & Permits 331,136 378,809 460,834 338,900 338,900 379,400 12.0% Intergovernmental Revenues 373,482 321,891 355,729 301,177 301,177 306,440 1.7% Charges for Services 280,288 318,278 366,926 267,664 267,664 320,470 19.7% Fines & Forfeits 41,124 48,744 42,474 42,100 42,100 42,300 0.5% Special Assessments 22,351 22,808 1,330 300 300 300 0.0% Miscellaneous 117,863 330,858 318,071 184,959 184,959 178,190 -3.7% Operating Transfers - - - - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ 6,988,345 $ 7,165,846 $ 7,668,119 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,802,000 2.7% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ 2,589,353 $ 2,555,898 $ 2,624,076 $ 2,979,264 $ 2,979,264 $ 3,096,654 3.9% Supplies 520,346 534,655 502,030 662,900 662,900 730,225 10.2% Other Services & Charges 3,291,055 3,256,898 3,418,181 3,712,936 3,712,936 3,728,621 0.4% Capital Outlay 59,535 108,900 171,082 240,900 240,900 246,500 2.3% Operating Transfers 92,000 293,000 297,012 - - - - -- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 6,552,289 $ 6,749,351 $ 7,012,381 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,802,000 2.7% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 3,478,507 $ 3,914,563 $ 4,331,058 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 436,056 416,495 655,738 - - - FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 3,914,563 $ 4,331,058 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 EDA FUND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ - $ $ $ 280,000 $ 280,000 653,564 - $ 280,000 653,564 - 0.0% Tax Increments 991,339 836,750 727,617 675,994 -3.3% Licenses & Permits - - - - Intergovernmental Revenues 11,875 Charges for Services - - Fines & Forfeits - - Special Assessments - - - - - Miscellaneous 114,821 330,833 197,745 140,716 140,066 117,250 -16.7% Operating Transfers 92,000 93,000 94,900 - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,198,160 $ 1,260,583 $ 1,032,137 $ 1,096,710 $ 12073,630 $ 1,0502814 -4.2% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ 3,116 $ 5,932 $ 10,545 $ 94,869 $ 94,869 $ 104,216 9.9% Supplies - 36 65 - - - - -- Other Services & Charges 114,183 752,594 364,429 409,120 380,409 363,330 -11.2% Capital Outlay 707,552 487,306 1,005,907 183,237 156,855 138,319 -24.5% Operating Transfers 779,804 218,353 - 200,000 200,000 200,000 0.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,604,655 $ 1,464,221 $ 1,380,946 $ 887,226 $ 832,133 $ 805,865 -9.2% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 7,521,807 $ 7,115,312 $ 6,911,674 $ 6,562,865 $ 6,562,865 $ 6,804,362 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures (406,495) (203,638) (348,809) 209,484 241,497 244,949 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 7,115,312 $ 6,911,674 $ 6,562,865 $ 6,772,349 $ 6,804,362 $ 7,049,311 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund RIVERSIDE CEMETERY 2013 2014 2015 REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ - $ $ $ $ $ __ Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services 12,913 37,465 26,394 26,000 26,000 26,325 1.3% Fines & Forfeits - - - - - - -- Special Assessments - - - - - - - -- Miscellaneous (314) 1,258 465 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.0 % Contributed Capital - - - - - - - - - -- Operating Transfers - - - - -- Debt Proceeds TOTAL REVENUES $ 12,599 $ 38,723 $ 26,859 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 $ 4,073 $ $ 27,325 4,072 1.2% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ 2,197 $ 3,089 $ 3,975 $ 4,073 0.0% Supplies 401 96 1,509 775 775 1,135 46.5% Other Services & Charges 13,645 19,200 19,771 22,152 22,152 22,118 -0.2 % Capital Outlay - - - Operating Transfers - - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 16,243 $ 22,385 $ 25,255 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 $ 27,325 1.2 % FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 19,353 $ 15,709 $ 32,047 $ 33,651 $ 33,651 $ 33,651 Excess (Deficiency) of - - - Revenues over Expenditures (3,644) 16,338 1,604 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 15,709 $ 32,047 $ 33,651 $ 33,651 $ 33,651 $ 33,651 MINN INVESTMENT FUND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ $ $ $ $ $ Licenses & Permits - - Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services - - - - 25,000 - 20,000 - Fines & Forfeits Special Assessments 25,000 Miscellaneous (14,840) 53,471 15,715 - 20.0% Operating Transfers TOTAL REVENUES $ (14,840) $ 53,471 $ 15,715 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 20,000 -20.0% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ $ $ $ $ $ - Supplies - - - - - Other Services & Charges - - - - - - -- Capital Outlay - - - - - - Operating Transfers - - - -- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ $ $ $ $ $ - FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 1,066,058 $ 1,051,218 $ 1,104,689 $ 1,120,404 $ 1,120,404 $ 1,145,404 Excess (Deficiency) of 15,715 Revenues over Expenditures (14,840) 53,471 25,000 25,000 20,000 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 1,051,218 $ 1,104,689 $ 1,120,404 $ 1,145,404 $ 1,145,404 $ 1,165,404 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE COMMUNITY CENTER 2013 2014 2015 REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL Property Taxes $ 1,181,335 $ 1,388,404 $ 1,363,000 $ 364,000 $ 364,000 $ 372,000 2.2% Licenses & Permits - - - - - - - -- Intergovernmental Revenues - - - - - - - -- Charges for Services 1,279,363 1,312,825 1,395,963 1,387,110 1,387,110 1,470,400 6.0% Fines & Forfeits - - - - -- Special Assessments - - - - - - - -- Miscellaneous 24,701 14,534 36,345 28,216 28,216 24,000 - 14.9% Operating Transfers 175,000 50,000 - - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ 2,660,399 $ 2,765,763 $ 2,795,308 $ 1,779,326 $ 1,779,326 $ 1,866,400 4.9% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ 969,868 $ 963,780 $ 1,007,862 $ 1,060,173 $ 1,060,173 $ 1,114,844 5.2% Supplies 278,327 182,906 173,369 201,653 201,653 202,000 0.2% Other Services & Charges 368,035 77,465 875,000 409,453 - 1,040,000 396,411 447,500 447,500 502,556 12.3% Capital Outlay Operating Transfers - 1,029,046 70,000 - 7_0,000 - 47,000 - - 32.9% - -- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 2,568,695 $ 2,596,139 $ 2,606,688 $ 1,779,326 $ 1,779,326 $ 1,866,400 4.9% $ 271,204 $ 629,448 FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 179,500 $ 440,828 $ 629,448 $ 629,448 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 91,704 169,624 188,620 - - - FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 271,204 $ 440,828 $ 629,448 $ 629,448 $ 629,448 $ 629,448 2014A GO JUDGMENT BONDS REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Revenues $ - $ $ - $ 544,000 $ 544,000 $ 536,929 -1.3% - - - Charges for Services - - Fines & Forfeits Special Assessments - - - - Miscellaneous 778 2,077 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.0% Operating Transfers - - - - - - -- Debt Proceeds 5,952,106 - - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ $ 5,952,884 $ 2,077 $ 545,000 $ 545,000 $ 537,929 -1.3% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Supplies - Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay - - - - Debt Service - 163,879 515,362 515,362 511,862 -0.7% Operating Transfers 5,783,732 - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ $ 5,783,732 $ 163,879 $ 515,362 $ 515,362 $ 511,862 -0.7% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ $ - 169,152 $ 169,152 (161,802) $ 7,350 $ 7,350 $ 36,988 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 29,638 29,638 26,067 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ $ 169,152 $ 7,350 $ 36,988 $ 36,988 $ 63,055 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE 2010A GO IMPROVEMENT BOND 2013 2014 2015 REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET Property Taxes $ 20,152 - $ $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 0.0% - -- Licenses & Permits - - - Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services Fines & Forfeits - - Special Assessments 118,480 61,310 70,257 52,299 113,900 48,019 -8.2 % Miscellaneous Operating Transfers Debt Proceeds (8,639) 308,195 - 26,613 5,775 - 235,134 - - 239,595 246,783 565,636 130,986 - 44.3% - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 438,188 $ 327,518 $ 362,815 $ 327,433 $ 657,935 $ 219,005 - 33.1% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Supplies - 288,350 - - 288,350 - - Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay - - - - Debt Service Operating Transfers 448,550 360,767 303,074 305,117 - 5.8% - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 448,550 $ 360,767 $ 303,074 $ 288,350 $ 288,350 $ 305,117 5.8% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 630,122 $ 646,252 $ 646,252 $ 1,015,837 $ 619,760 $ 586,511 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures (10,362) (33,249) 59,741 39,083 369,585 (86,112) FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 619,760 $ 586,511 $ 646,252 $ 685,335 $ 1,015,837 $ 929,725 2008 G.O. SEWER REFUNDING REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ 502,889 $ 499,697 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 0.0% Licenses & Permits - - - - - - - -- Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services - - - - Fines & Forfeits Special Assessments Miscellaneous (12,429) 21,686 7,709 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.0% Operating Transfers 450,000 857,337 1,089,754 340,000 685,000 - - 100.0% Debt Proceeds - - - - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ 940,460 $ 1,378,720 $ 1,597,463 $ 845,000 $ 1,190,000 $ 505,000 - 40.2% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Supplies - Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay - - - - - Debt Service 1,050,216 1,049,360 1,048,767 1,049,254 1,567,442 1,521,832 45.0% Operating Transfers - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,050,216 $ 1,049,360 $ 1,048,767 $ 1,049,254 $ 1,567,442 $ 1,521,832 45.0% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 660,704 $ 550,948 $ 880,308 $ 1,429,004 $ 1,429,004 $ 1,051,562 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures (109,756) 329,360 548,696 _ (204,254) (377,442) (1,016,832) FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 550,948 $ 880,308 $ 1,429,004 $ 1,224,750 $ 1,051,562 $ 34,730 I 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE 2011A G.O. BOND FUND (2005A) 2013 2014 2015 REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET Property Taxes $ 246,424 $ 222,865 - $ 330,000 - - $ 330,000 $ 330,000 $ 139,783 - 57.6% Licenses & Permits - - - - Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services - - Fines & Forfeits - - Special Assessments 753,058 1,049,370 2,042,331 517,124 330,628 162,359 - 68.6% Miscellaneous 224,246 251,357 220,210 208,900 208,900 208,900 0.0% Operating Transfers Debt Proceeds 2,658,286 - 1,769,953 964,508 700,000 200,000 - 468,376 - 33.1% - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ 3,882,014 $ 3,293,545 $ 3,557,049 $ 1,756,024 $ 1,069,528 $ 979,418 - 44.2% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Supplies - 2,424,450 - - Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay - 2,911,356 - - - - - Debt Service Operating Transfers 2,880,767 2,461,375 2,424,450 784,150 -67.7% - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 2,911,356 $ 2,880,767 $ 2,461,375 $ 2,424,450 $ 2,424,450 $ 784,150 - 67.7% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 346,648 $ 1,317,306 $ 2,825,758 $ 2,825,758 $ 1,470,836 $ 1,730,084 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 970,658 412,778 1,095,674 (668,426) (1,354,922) 195,268 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 1,317,306 $ 1,730,084 $ 2,825,758 $ 2,157,332 $ 1,470,836 $ 1,666,104 2015B G.O. Bonds REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ $ $ $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 195,288 - 21.9% Licenses & Permits - - - Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services - - - Fines & Forfeits Special Assessments 22,000 22,000 26,000 18.2% Miscellaneous 665 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.0% Operating Transfers - - - - - - -- Debt Proceeds - - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ $ $ 665 $ 273,000 $ 273,000 $ 222,288 - 18.6% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ Supplies - Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay - - - Debt Service 212,468 212,468 208,000 -2.1% Operating Transfers - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ $ $ $ 212,468 $ 212,468 $ 208,000 -2.1% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ $ $ 665 $ 665 60,532 $ 665 $ 61,197 14,288 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 60,532 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ $ $ 665 $ 61,197 $ 61,197 $ 75,485 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE 2016A G.O. Bonds 2013 2014 2015 REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET Property Taxes $ $ $ $ $ $ 415,000 Licenses & Permits - Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services Fines & Forfeits - Special Assessments 140,000 - -- Miscellaneous - Operating Transfers Debt Proceeds - - TOTAL REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ 555,000 - -- EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ $ $ $ $ $ Supplies - Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay - Debt Service 530,000 Operating Transfers - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ $ $ $ $ $ 530,000 - -- FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ $ $ $ $ $ Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures - - 25,000 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 2007A IMPROVEMENT BOND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANG Property Taxes $ 427,447 $ 539,672 $ 420,000 $ 420,000 $ 420,000 $ 610,000 45.2% Licenses & Permits - - - - - - - -- Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services - - - Fines & Forfeits Special Assessments 144,881 378,594 120,816 96,082 108,678 104,088 8.3% Miscellaneous (2,872) (4,309) 1,882 - - - - -- Operating Transfers - - - - -- Debt Proceeds - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 569,456 $ 913,957 $ 542,698 $ 516,082 $ 528,678 $ 714,088 38.4% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - -- Supplies - - - - Other Services & Charges 375 167 225 Capital Outlay - - - - - Debt Service 625,115 625,710 620,840 619,600 1,175,500 536,000 - 13.5% Operating Transfers - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 625,490 $ 625,877 $ 621,065 $ 619,600 $ 1,175,500 $ 536,000 - 13.5 % FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 316,936 $ 260,902 $ 548,982 $ 470,615 $ 470,615 $ (176,207) Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures (56,034) 288,080 (78,367) (103,518) (646,822) 178,088 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 260,902 $ 548,982 $ 470,615 $ 367,097 $ 176,207 $ 1,881 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund CAPITAL PROJECT FUND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL _ 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET CHANGE Property Taxes $ $ 228,854 $ 79,146 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 50,000 - 83.3 % Franchise & Other Taxes 53,933 36,865 - 36,000 36,000 - -- Intergovernmental Revenues 892,150 41,962 945,756 1,047,000 1,210,000 250,000 - 76.1% Charges for Services - - - - - - Fines & Forfeits - - - - - - -- Special Assessments - 159,038 276,023 - Miscellaneous (5,701) 21,523 8,176 - Operating Transfers 460,401 - 200,000 2,500,000 5,000,000 - 5,000,000 - - 100.0% Debt Proceeds - 2,651,898 5,000,000 0.0% TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,346,850 $ 705,310 $ 3,997,864 $ 8,847,000 $ 6,546,000 $ 5,336,000 - 39.7% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Supplies - 9,497 135 - - - Other Services & Charges 23,737 16,615 96,400 - 125,000 - Capital Outlay 1,627,483 893,015 1,268,277 9,177,000 5,677,000 6,800,000 - 25.9% Operating Transfers 187,500 - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,838,720 $ 919,127 $ 1,364,812 $ 9,177,000 $ 5,802,000 $ 6,800,000 - 25.9% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 795,453 $ 303,583 $ 89,766 $ 2,722,_818 $ 2,722,818 $ 3,466,818 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures (491,870) (213,817) 2,633,052 (330,000) 744,000 (1,464,000) FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 303,583 $ 89,766 $ 2,722,818 $ 2,392,818 $ 3,466,818 $ 2,002,818 CLOSED BOND FUND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ $ $ $ $ - $ - -- Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Revenues - - - Charges for Services Fines & Forfeits - - - - - Special Assessments 1,027,174 241,810 695,738 100,720 100,720 65,900 - 34.6% Miscellaneous (19,501) 67,631 16,933 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.0% Operating Transfers - 5,872 - - - - -- Debt Proceeds TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,007,673 $ 309,441 $ 718,543 $ 105,720 $ 105,720 $ 70,900 - 32.9% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ $ $ $ $ $ Supplies - - - Other Services & Charges - - - - Capital Outlay - Debt Service 664,500 753,500 Operating Transfers 750,000 855,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 750,000 $ 664,500 $ 855,000 $ $ 753,500 $ FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 1,116,150 $ 1,373,823 $ 1,018,764 $ 882,307 $ 882,307 $ 234,527 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 257,673 (355,059) (136,457) 105,720 (647,780)1 70,900 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 1,373,823 $ 1,018,764 $ 882,307 $ 988,027 $ 234,527 $ 305,427 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund PARK & PATHWAY DEDICATION 2013 2014 2015 REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ - $ 369,713 - $ $ $ $ -- Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Revenues 100,000 Charges for Services 107,929 Fines & Forfeits - - - - - -- Special Assessments - 112,408 Miscellaneous (7,851) 32,870 15,225 2,000 2,000 2,000 0.0 % Operating Transfers 750,000 664,500 855,000 - 753,500 - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ 742,149 $ 1,067,083 $ 1,190,562 $ 2,000 $ 755,500 $ 2,000 0.0% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - - -- Supplies - 8,765 7,000 823,000 - 1,343,500 - 288,000 - Other Services & Charges 6,000 38,539 48,707 Capital Outlay Operating Transfers 205,470 1,254,879 636,528 - 65.0% - - - - -- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 211,470 $ 1,302,183 $ 692,235 $ 823,000 $ 1,343,500 $ 288,000 - 65.0% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 442,754 $ 973,433 $ 738,333 $ 1,236,660 $ 1,236,660 $ 648,660 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 530,679 (235,100) (821,000) (588,000) 498,327 (286,000) FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 973,433 $ 738,333 $ 1,236,660 $ 415,660 $ 648,660 $ 362,660 STORMWATER ACCESS FUND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANG Property Taxes $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Licenses & Permits - - - - - -- Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services - 38,494 285,251 50,000 50,000 50,000 0.0% Fines & Forfeits - - - --- Special Assessments - - - - - - -- Miscellaneous (17,598) 39,638 15,399 20,000 15,000 15,000 - 25.0% Operating Transfers - - - - - Debt Proceeds - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 17,598) $ 78,132 $ 300,650 $ 70,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 -7.1% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Supplies - - Other Services & Charges 7,164 292 322 Capital Outlay - - - - - Operating Transfers 321,800 326,300 - 503,943 268,376 - -- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 328,964 $ 326,592 $ 322 $ - $ 503,943 $ 268,376 - -- FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 1,468,743 $ 1,122,181 $ 873,721 $ 1,174,049 $ 1,174,049 $ 735;106 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 70,000 (438,943) (346,562) (248,460) 300,328 (203,376) FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 1,122,181 $ 873,721 $ 1,174,049 $ 1,244,049 $ 735,106 $ 531,730 7 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS 2013 2014 2015 REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET Property Taxes $ - $ - 43,620 - - $ - $ - $ - 80,000 - $ - 80,000 - - -- Franchise & Other Taxes 86,003 80,119 80,000 0.0% Licenses & Permits - - -- Intergovernmental Revenues - - Charges for Services 10,000 10,000 10,000 Fines & Forfeits Special Assessments - - 12,220 Miscellaneous (10,106) 86,976 0.0% Operating Transfers Debt Proceeds TOTAL REVENUES $ 75,897 $ - $ 130,596 $ - - $ 92,339 $ - - 333,559 - - $ 90,000 $ - 335,000 - $ 90,000 $ - 25,000 - $ $ 90,000 - 75,000 - 0.0% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies - -- Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Operating Transfers - 77.6% - -- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ - $ 333,559 $ 335,000 $ 25,000 $ 75,000 - 77.6% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 681,660 $ 746,660 $ 716,387 $ 792,284 $ 922,880 $ 681,660 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 75,897 130,596 (241,220) (245,000) 65,000 15,000 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 792,284 $ 922,880 $ 681,660 $ 436,660 $ 746,660 $ 761,660 STREET RECONSTRUCTION REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ 2,346 $ 176 $ $ $ $ Licenses & Permits - - Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services - - - - Fines & Forfeits Special Assessments - Miscellaneous (24,620) 84,752 24,910 25,000 25,000 25,000 0.0% Operating Transfers - - - - - - -- Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ (22,274) $ 84,928 $ 24,910 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 0.0% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - -- Supplies - 1,500,000 - 45,608 - - 45,693 Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Operating Transfers 219,000 - 97.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 219,000 $ $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 45,608 $ 45,693 - 97.0% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 1,907,379 $ 1,666,105 $ 1,751,033 $ 1,775,943 $ 1,775,943 $ 1,755,335 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures (241,274) 84,928 24,910 (1,475,000) (20,608) (20,693) FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 1,666,105 $ 1,751,033 $ 1,775,943 $ 300,943 $ 1,755,335 $ 1,734,642 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund WATER FUND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL _ 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ - 1,920 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 200 - -- Licenses & Permits 2,735 4,635 3,700 3,700 -94.6% Intergovernmental Revenues - - -- Charges for Services 1,170,787 1,042,343 1,093,984 1,146,800 1,146,800 1,122,299 -2.1% Fines & Forfeits - - - - - - -- Special Assessments 44,339 40,440 12,998 30,000 30,000 30,000 0.0% Miscellaneous (36,171) 230,817 84,307 71,000 71,000 51,000 - 28.2% Contributed Capital 81,362 256,163 80,000 80,000 80,000 0.0% Operating Transfers - - - -- Debt Proceeds - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,180,875 $ 1,397,697 $ 1,452,087 $ 1,331,500 $ 1,331,500 $ 1,283,499 -3.6% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ 212,410 $ 188,151 $ 181,810 $ 304,153 $ 304,153 $ 327,954 7.8% Supplies 82,194 160,665 152,257 167,350 167,350 178,150 6.5% Other Services & Charges 195,257 221,750 256,740 311,305 311,305 314,150 0.9% Capital Outlay 318,708 11,656 35,916 358,000 1,258,000 426,000 19.0% Debt Service Operating Transfers 413,500 631,560 790,958 1,650,000 199,327 - - 100.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,222,069 $ 1,213,782 $ 1,417,681 $ 2,790,808 $ 2,240,135 $ 1,246,254 -55.3% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 4,608,692 $ 4,567,498 $ 4,751,413 $ 4,785,819 $ 4,785,819 $ 3,877,184 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures (41,194) 183,915 34,406 (1,459,308) (908,635) 37,245 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 4,567,498 $ 4,751,413 $ 4,785,819 $ 3,326,511 $ 3,877,184 $ 3,914,429 SEWAGE FUND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property taxes $ $ $ $ $ $ Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Revenues - - 2,050,500 - 2,095,892 Charges for Services 1,981,967 2,047,789 2,052,311 2,050,500 2.2% Fines & Forfeits - - - - -- Special Assessments - - - - - - - -- Miscellaneous (23,047) 195,867 61,340 62,000 62,000 62,000 0.0% Contributed Capital 885,132 1,179,707 60,450 760,450 60,450 0.0% Operating Transfers - - - - - 2,000,000 - - -- Debt Proceeds 3,003,224 2,000,000 700,000 -65.0% TOTAL REVENUES $ 4,962,144 $ 3,128,788 $ 3,293,358 $ 4,172,950 $ 4,872,950 $ 2,918,342 -30.1% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ 263,020 $ 242,621 $ 280,801 $ 307,175 $ 307,175 $ 332,762 8.3% Supplies 16,057 22,132 15,597 24,650 24,650 23,150 -6.1% Other Services & Charges 997,338 1,305,025 1,229,082 1,231,201 1,231,201 1,230,463 -0.1% Capital Outlay 2,935,299 127,857 401,069 2,333,000 2,333,000 1,000,000 -57.1% Debt Service 172,259 364,963 358,072 492,198 698,198 373,574 -24.1% Operating Transfers - 1,690,672 1,510,087 425,134 770,134 85,293 -79.9% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 4,383,973 $ 3,753,270 $ 3,794,708 $ 4,813,358 $ 5,364,358 $ 3,045,242 - 36.7% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 3,189,214 $ 3,767,385 $ 3,142,903 $ 2,641,553 $ 2,641,553 $ 2,150,145 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 578,171 (624,482) (501,350) (640,408) (491,408) (126,900) FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 3,767,385 $ 3,142,903 $ 2,641,553 $ 2,001,145 $ 2,150,145 $ 2,023,245 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE LIQUOR FUND 2013 2014 2015 REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET Sale of Goods $ 5,085,925 $ 5,165,737 $ 5,489,430 $ 5,367,710 $ 5,367,710 $ 5,435,194 1.3% Licenses & Permits - - - - - - - -- Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services Fines & Forfeits - Special Assessments Miscellaneous (7,596) 13,709 7,503 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.0% Contributed Capital - - - - - - -- Operating Transfers - Debt Proceeds TOTAL REVENUES $ 5,078,329 $ 441,640 $ 5,179,446 $ 455,647 $ 5,496,933 $ 506,042 $ 5,372,710 $ 5,372,710 $ 532,654 $ $ 5,440,194 570,584 1.3% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ 532,654 7.1% Supplies 3,759,667 3,865,883 4,043,820 4,045,798 4,045,798 4,094,774 1.2% Other Services & Charges 209,149 202,811 202,271 235,214 235,214 238,245 1.3% Capital Outlay - 650,000 - - 75,000 75,000 75,000 0.0% Debt Service Operating Transfers 600,000 450,000 350,000 350,000 230,000 -34.3% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 5,060,456 $ 5,124,341 $ 5,202,133 $ 5,238,666 $ 5,238,666 $ 5,208,603 -0.6% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 649,665 $ 667,538 $ 722,643 $ 1,017,443 $ 1,017,443 $ 1,151,487 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 17,873 55,105 294,800 134,044 134,044 $ 231,591 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 667,538 $ 722,643 $ 1,017,443 $ 1,151,487 $ 1,151,487 $ 1,383,078 DEPUTY REGISTRAR REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ $ $ $ - 400,100 $ 475,100 $ - 475,100 Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Revenues 497,709 - 531,408 - -- Charges for Services 456,285 18.7% Fines & Forfeits - - - - - - - -- Special Assessments - - - - - Miscellaneous (2,089) 10,825 11,201 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.0% Operating Transfers - - - - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ 454,196 $ 508,534 $ 542,609 $ 401,100 $ 476,100 $ 476,100 18.7% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ 269,045 $ 254,363 $ 293,179 $ 313,561 $ 313,561 $ 324,141 3.4% Supplies 8,601 10,572 4,294 16,250 16,250 16,550 1.8% Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Operating Transfers 38,212 - 75,000 34,589 33,263 41,605 41,605 43,245 3.9% - -- - -- - - 50,000 - - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 390,858 $ 349,524 $ 330,736 $ 371,416 $ 371,416 $ 383,936 3.4% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 110,764 $ 174,102 $ 333,112 $ 544,985 $ 544,985 $ 649,669 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 63,338 159,010 211,873 29,684 104,684 92,164 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 174,102 $ 333,112 $ 544,985 $ 574,669 $ 649,669 $ 741,833 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund FIBER OPTICS 2013 2014 2015 REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ - $ $ $ $ $ -- Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services 1,595,490 1,652,998 1,592,824 1,643,670 1,643,670 1,721,570 4.7% Fines & Forfeits - - - - - - -- Special Assessments - - - - - - - -- Miscellaneous 668,094 105,655 49,579 46,779 46,779 46,297 -1.0 %° Contributed Capital - - - - - - - -- Operating Transfers 860,000 6,383,732 450,000 350,000 350,000 230,000 - 34.3% Debt Proceeds - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 3,123,584 $ 8,142,385 $ 2,092,403 $ 2,040,449 $ 2,040,449 $ 1,997,867 -2.1% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ 445,423 $ 480,585 $ 568,321 $ 640,185 $ 640,185 $ - - 100.0% Supplies 166,060 145,304 104,165 131,488 131,488 101,506 - 22.8% Other Services & Charges 1,790,009 1,742,265 1,338,058 1,264,139 1,264,139 1,596,303 26.3% Capital Outlay 226,667 - 111,313 - - 259,900 - -- Debt Service 642,620 5,689,322 - - - Operating Transfers - - - - - - -- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 3,270,779 $ 8,057,476 $ 2,121,857 $ 2,035,812 $ 2,035,812 $ 1,957,709 -3.8% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 224,252 $ 77,057 $ 161,966 $ 132,512 $ 132,512 $ 137,149 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures (147,195) 84,909 (29,454) 4,637 4,637 40,158 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 77,057 $ 161,966 $ 132,512 $ 137,149 $ 137,149 $ 177,307 IT SERVICES REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE 2014 2015 2016 ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Property Taxes Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Revenues $ -- Charges for Services 125,000 252,708 278,100 298,981 298,981 274,366 -8.2 % Fines & Forfeits - - - - - - -- Special Assessments - - - - - - Miscellaneous (136) 2,864 - - 1,252 - - 153 - - 153 153 0.0 %° - -- - -- Operating Transfers 30,000 - - - Debt Proceeds TOTAL REVENUES $ 154,864 $ 255,572 $ 279,352 $ 299,134 $ 299,134 $ 274,519 -8.2 % EXPENDITURES $ - 32,200 $ 32,200 Personnel Services $ $ - $ - $ - Supplies 7,473 22,803 18,582 32,200 0.0% Other Services & Charges 108,416 195,917 196,834 256,780 256,780 256,780 0.0% Capital Outlay 17_,013 - - 3,403 - - 10,000 - - 10,000 - - 10,000 - - 0.0% Debt Service - - - -- Operating Transfers TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 132,902 $ 218,720 $ 218,819 $ 298,980 $ 298,980 $ 298,980 0.0% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ - $ 21,962 $ 58,814 $ 119,347 $ 119,347 $ 119,501 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 21,962 36,852 60,533 154 154 (24,461) FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 21,962 $ 58,814 $ 119 „347 $' 119,501 $ 119,501 $ 95,040 2017 Proposed Final Budget - Summary by Fund CENTRAL EQUIPMENT FUND 2013 2014 2015 REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANGE Property Taxes $ - $ $ $ $ $ __ Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services 62,535 111,900 142,800 204,600 204,600 210,700 3.0% Fines & Forfeits - - - - - - -- Special Assessments - - - - - - - -- Miscellaneous (5,726) 42,527 15,357 5,110 5,110 5,000 -2.2% Operating Transfers 500,663 - - - - - - - - Debt Proceeds 500,000 515,000 - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,057,472 $ 669,427 $ 158,157 $ 209,710 $ 209,710 $ 215,700 2.9% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - -- Supplies - - - Other Services & Charges 4,567 - - - - - Capital Outlay 95,000 589,853 239,463 451,000 332,000 376,000 - 16.6% Debt Service 59,297 66,992 76,193 131,260 - 131,260 135,050 2.9% Operating Transfers - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 158,864 $ 656,845 $ 315,656 $ 582,260 $ 463,260 $ 511,050 -12.2% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ - $ 898,608 $ 911,190 $ 753,691 $ 753,691 $ 500,141 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 898,608 12,582 (157,499) (372,550) (253,550) (295,350) FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 898,608 $ 911,190 $ 753,691 $ 381,141 $ 500,141 $ 204,791 BENEFIT ACCRUAL FUND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET i 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % CHANG Property Taxes $ $ $ $ $ $ Licenses & Permits - - - Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services - - - 6,575 6,575 17,000 158.6% Fines & Forfeits - - - -- Special Assessments - - - - - -- Miscellaneous - 3,000 3,000 - -- Operating Transfers - - 226,158 - - - -- Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ $ $ 226,158 $ 6,575 $ 9,575 $ 20,000 204.2% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Supplies - - - - Other Services & Charges - - - - - Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - Operating Transfers - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ $ $ $ 226,158 $ 226,158 $ 235,733 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures - 226,158 6,575 9,575 20,000 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ $ $ 226,158 $ 232,733 $ 235,733 $ 255,733 Proposed 2017 Budget Draft - 12 -12 GENERAL FUND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % (CHANGE Property Taxes Franchise & Other Taxes $ 5,580,437 $ 5,507,285 $ 5,887,666 $ 6,177,000 $ 6,177,000 $ 6,291,000 1.8% 0.0% 241,664 237,173 235,089 283,900 283,900 283,900 Licenses & Permits 331,136 378,809 460,834 338,900 338,900 379,400 12.0% Intergovernmental Revenues 373,482 321,891 355,729 301,177 301,177 306,440 1.7% Charges for Services 280,288 318,278 366,926 267,664 267,664 320,470 19.7% Fines & Forfiets 41,124 48,744 42,474 42,100 42,100 42,300 0.5% Special Assessments 22,351 22,808 1,330 300 184,959 300 300 178,190 0.0% -3.7% Miscellaneous 117,863 330,858 318,071 184,959 Operating Transfers - - - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUES $ 6,988,345 $ 7,165,846 $ 7,668,119 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,802,000 2.7% EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT GENERAL GOVERNMENT Mayor and Council City Administration Elections Finance $ 53,696 260,322 38,740 326,510 $ 52,182 $ 52,572 $ 53,925 $ 53,925 $ 57,350 6.4% 273,992 305,684 259,441 259,441 286,785 10.5% 75,594 29,658 104,162 104,162 115,092 10.5% 385,662 377,867 428,980 428,980 445,375 3.8% Audit 47,823 53,541 37,798 45,000 45,000 42,000 -6.7% City Assessing 49,664 49,832 50,466 52,115 52,115 52,115 0.0% Legal 46,905 29,303 36,946 37,000 37,000 38,000 2.7% Human Resources 93,067 90,565 117,249 118,688 118,688 124,288 4.7% Planning & Zoning 182,753 220,080 244,976 218,023 218,023 230,848 5.9% Information Technology Services 59,257 - - 10,900 10,900 - - 100.0% City Hall 216,693 193,874 193,032 209,723 209,723 219,287 4.6% Prairie Center Building 15,355 14,409 13,327 14,120 14,120 12,841 -9.1% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 1,390,785 $ 1,439,034 $ 1,459,575 $ 1,552,077 $ 1,552,077 $ 1,623,981 4.6% PUBLIC SAFETY Law Enforcement $ 1,190,441 $ 1,145,247 $ 1,174,439 $ 1,222,627 $ 1,222,627 $ 1,263,948 3.4% Fire & Rescue 222,141 306,779 309,970 333,823 333,823 355,810 6.6% Fire Relief 109,594 108,186 120,027 80,000 80,000 80,000 0.0% Building Inspections 251,007 266,545 304,858 369,663 369,663 384,627 4.0% Civil Defense 9,707 1,661 1,500 3,930 3,930 3,564 -9.3% Animal Control 47,426 49,439 48,754 51,348 51,348 51,520 0.3% National Guard 14,517 14,061 13,438 16,050 16,050 15,300 -4.7% TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $ 1,844,833 $ 1,891,918 $ 1,972,986 $ 2,077,441 $ 2,077,441 $ 2,154,769 3.7% General Fund Summary GENERAL FUND REVENUES 2013 ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015 ACTUAL 2016 BUDGET 2016 PROJECTED 2017 BUDGET % (CHANGE PUBLIC WORKS Public Works Administration $ 113,882 $ 122,151 $ 124,504 $ 194,771 $ 194,771 $ 147,431 -24.3% Engineering 224,028 195,841 110,555 160,058 160,058 174,900 9.3% Public Works Inspecitons 54,878 36,867 32,084 88,809 88,809 108,766 22.5% Streets & Alleys 692,011 739,443 739,866 976,962 976,962 994,001 1.7% Ice & Snow 210,552 308,387 263,020 284,280 284,280 290,156 2.1% Shop & Garage 186,741 177,644 185,837 204,101 204,101 206,353 1.1% Stormwater 12,064 16,842 26,712 73,121 73,121 72,048 -1.5% Street Lighting Refuse Collection 206,005 195,695 517,955 226,485 263,900 614,437 263,900 614,437 273,900 3.8% 505,996 563,477 616,237 0.3% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS TRANSIT $ 2,206,157 - $ 2,310,825 $ 2,272,540 $ 2,860,439 $ 2,860,439 $ 2,883,792 0.8% Bus 1U,uuu 40,000 4U,000 40,UUU b,000 -87.b% TOTAL TRANSIT - 10,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 5,000 -87.5% RECREATION AND CULTURE Senior Center 90,219 97,547 97,115 101,672 101,672 102,572 0.9% Ice Arena 75,000 - - - - - - -- Park Operations 572,985 570,639 706,934 824,997 824,997 891,848 8.1% Park Ballfields 25,517 18,149 16,971 27,300 27,300 27,300 0.0% Shade Tree 53,475 68,891 104,990 63,527 63,527 66,226 4.2% Library 35,395 36,764 36,176 40,526 40,526 38,000 -6.2% TOTAL RECREATION AND CULTURI $ 852,591 $ 791,990 $ 962,186 $ 1,058,022 $ 1,058,022 $ 1,125,946 6.4% UNALLOCATED Economic Development 0 - - - - - - -- Insurance 127,710 12,584 8,082 8,021 8,021 8,512 6.1% TOTAL UNALLOCATED $ 127,710 $ 12,584 $ 8,082 $ 8,021 $ 8,021 $ 8,512 6.1% OTHER USES - -- Operating Tranfers $ 130,213 $ 293,000 $ 297,012 $ - $ - $ - -- TOTAL OTHER USES $ 130,213 $ 293,000 $ 297,012 $ - $ - $ - - -- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 6,552,289 $ 6,749,351 $ 7,012,381 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,596,000 $ 7,802,000 2.7% FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 $ 3,914,563 $ 4,331,058 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 $ 3,478,507 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures 436,056 416,495 655,738 - - - FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 $ 3,914,563 $ 4,331,058 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 $ 4,986,796 General Fund Summary Capital Improvement Plan 2017 -2026 E Ref. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Public Works Stop Light Painting MNC -15 -004 40,000 40,000 40,000 120,000 Street Banners MNC -15 -005 16,000 16,000 Public Works Facility PWK -13 -001 11,000,000 3,000,000 14,000,000 PW Facility Land Acquisition PWK -13 -002 600,000 600,000 Generator STE -13 -011 7,000 7,000 Speed Trailer VEQ -13 -010 14,000 14,000 One -Ton Truck VEQ -13 -013 65,000 65,000 Truck - Pickup 4X4 VEQ -13 -014 35,000 35,000 Bucket Truck VEQ -13 -015 130,000 130,000 Blacktop Paver VEQ -13 -016 80,000 80,000 Blacktop Planer VEQ -13 -017 - Router /Cutter VEQ -13 -018 - Concrete Saw VEQ -13 -019 20,000 20,000 Backhoe VEQ -13 -021 95,000 95,000 Plow Truck VEQ -13 -022 230,000 255,000 485,000 One -Ton Truck and Plow VEQ -13 -023 65,000 65,000 Snow Go Snow Blower VEQ -13 -025 142,000 142,000 Skid Steere Loader VEQ -13 -026 65,000 65,000 Sign Lab System VEQ -13 -027 35,000 35,000 Paver Trailer VEQ -13 -028 20,000 20,000 Blacktop Roller VEQ -13 -030 30,000 30,000 Wheel Loader- 3 yd. VEQ -14 -001 230,000 235,000 465,000 Street Sweeper VEQ -14 -002 190,000 190,000 Blacktop Hot Box VEQ -14 -003 80,000 80,000 Snow Plow Skid Steere VEQ -16 -002 - Road Grader VEQ -16 -007 300,000 300,000 Electronic Sign Reader VEQ -16 -001 12,000 12,000 Median Size Loader VEQ -16 -006 70,000 70,000 Hot Rubber Melter Crack Sealer VEQ -16 -004 50,000 50,000 Mini Tank Tack Trailer VEQ -16 -005 20,000 20,000 V Box Sander VEQ -17 -003 15,000 15,000 Subtotal - Public Works 317,000 1,145,000 11,540,000 3,334,000 400,000 490,000 - - - - 17,226,000 Recreation & Culture Featherstone Park Development PAR -13 -002 80,000 80,000 Sunset Ponds Shelter PAR -13 -003 15,000 15,000 Pioneer Park - Band Shell PAR -13 -004 90,000 90,000 Monti Hill Park Development PAR -13 -006 10,000 5,000 15,000 Bertram Lakes Land Acquisition PAR -13 -008 510,000 510,000 Dugout Roofs - Xcel Ball Fields PAR -13 -011 - BCOL Ball Fields PAR -13 -012 2,500,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 8,100,000 Ellison Park Log Shelter PAR -13 -013 250,000 250,000 CSAH 75 Pathway Lighting (W & E Bridge) PAR -13 -014 60,000 60,000 Dog Park Meadow Oaks Park PAR -15 -001 - Spirt Hills Pathway Connection PAR -15 -003 - Fenning Avenue Pathway Connection PAR -15 -004 250,000 250,000 West Bridge Splash Pad /East Bridge Band Shell PAR -15 -005 800,000 800,000 Park Shop Addition 20x36 PAR -15 -006 50,000 50,000 Ellison Park Memorial project PAR -16 -001 6,000 6,000 Ellison Open Air Shelter PAR -17 -001 58,000 58,000 Rolling Woods Playground PAR -17 -003 65,000 65,000 Rolling Woods Sidewalk PAR -17 -005 40,000 40,000 Riverside Columbarium PAR -17 -006 40,000 40,000 E Capital Improvement Plan 2017 -2026 Ref. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Front Street Pier PAR -17 -007 5,000 5,000 4,355,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,400,000 25,000 25,000 Tot Lot Play Equipment (Cardinal Hills) PAR -17 -010 15,000 15,000 City -view Mountain Bike Trail PAR -17 -011 10,000 - DMV Vehicle VEQ -13 -047 20,000 10,000 Park Mowers VEQ -13 -031 60,000 Subtotal - Deputy Registrar 60,000 Trucks VEQ -13 -032 - 20,000 26,000 65,000 70,000 161,000 MT Trackless Sidewalk Machine VEQ -13 -033 140,000 Parking Lot Improvements LIQ -13 -002 140,000 Cushman Truckster VEQ -13 -037 Point of Sale Software 25,000 20,000 25,000 JD Tractor VEQ -13 -038 1,500,000 40,000 Liquor Store Coolers VEQ -13 -046 25,000 40,000 Skid Loader VEQ -13 -039 65,000 70,000 135,000 Toro Infield Pro 5040 VEQ -13 -041 - 1,625,000 20,000 20,000 Utility Mule - Replace Kawaski #202 VEQ -15 -001 15,000 15,000 Trac Vac Sweeper VEQ -17 -001 - 32,000 32,000 Toro Polar Trac (72 ") replaces at CC VEQ -17 -002 50,000 50,000 Sod Cutter STE -13 -012 5,000 5,000 Tables and benches STE -16 -001 - WB wee notes package (Musical Instruments) STE -16 -003 - Buggy Hauler STE -17 -001 6,000 6,000 Bagger for Zero Turn Mower STE -17 -002 3,600 3,600 Fertilizer Spreader STE -17 -003 6,000 6,000 Pathway Improvemnents (reclassify) MNC -13 -007 40,000 41,200 41,200 41,200 41,200 41,200 41,200 41,200 41,200 41,200 410,800 Ballfield Fencing MNC -16 -001 - Gazebos MNC -16 -002 10,000 10,000 Boarding Dock for Ellison MNC -16 -003 - Planters MNC -17 -001 3,500 3,500 Bike Racks MNC -17 -002 2,000 2,000 Financed by Park and Pathway Fund in bold Subtotal - Recreation 834,100 3,330,200 946,200 926,200 741,200 741,200 741,200 811,200 741,200 1,791,200 11,603,900 323,000 Fire & Rescue Fire Station Addition FRD -13 -001 250,000 250,000 New Fire Station FRD -13 -002 3,000,000 3,000,000 SCBA Packs STE -13 -006 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 50,000 Fire Ladder Truck VEQ -13 -006 1,100,000 1,100,000 Generator MNC -16 -005 - Turnout Gear STE -16 -005 - Subtotal - Fire & Rescue 5,000 5,000 4,355,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,400,000 Deputy Registrar Security Cameras STE -13 -018 - DMV Vehicle VEQ -13 -047 20,000 20,000 Subtotal - Deputy Registrar - 20,000 - - - 20,000 Liquor Store Parking Lot Improvements LIQ -13 -002 75,000 75,000 Point of Sale Software VEQ -17 -001 20,000 Liquor Store LIQ -13 -003 - 1,500,000 1,500,000 Liquor Store Coolers VEQ -13 -046 25,000 25,000 50,000 Subtotal - Liquor Store 120,000 - 1,525,000 - 1,625,000 2 Capital Improvement Plan 2017 -2026 Subtotal - Streets Ref. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total IT Services - Stormwater Pond Restoration SWD -13 -001 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 400,000 Stormwater Liftstation (TH 25 Pond) SWD -13 -002 1,000,000 1,000,000 Expand Fallon Avenue Pond Personal Computers STE -13 -001 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 156,000 Ledger Size Color Scanner STE -13 -002 120,000 Liftstation - Marvin Road - 275,600 275,600 WWTP Phosphorus Reduction Improvements UTS -13 -003 - Multi- Server Component Upgrade STE -13 -003 - - UTS -13 -004 1,365,000 1,365,000 WWTP Phase 2 Improvements - Laptops STE -13 -005 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 30,000 GIS Hardware and Software STE -13 -007 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 80,000 Pavement Management Software STE -13 -008 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 4,600 4,600 4,600 40,400 Subtotal - IT Services 29,800 30,000 30,200 30,400 30,600 30,800 31,000 31,200 31,200 31,200 306,400 Streets City Street Signs MNC -13 -001 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 400,000 Annual Chip Seal MNC -14 -001 176,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 1,796,000 School Blvd /Cedar Street Signal STR -13 -001 50,000 450,000 500,000 Parking Lot Reconstruction STR -13 -002 90,000 90,000 Overlay Rural Outlying Streets STR -13 -004 800,000 600,000 1,400,000 E 7th Street/Hwy 25 Intersection STR -13 -005 1,650,000 - - Fallon Avenue Overpass STR -13 -006 2,000,000 5,250,000 550,000 7,800,000 Street Reconstruction - Area 5 STR -13 -007 300,000 300,000 Street Reconstruction - Area 6 STR -13 -008 50,000 1,300,000 150,000 1,500,000 Street Reconstruction - Area 7B STR -13 -009 50,000 1,100,000 125,000 1,275,000 Street Light Improvements STR -13 -010 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 750,000 TH 25 /CSAH 75 Intersection Improvements STR -13 -014 - Elm Street Sidewalk and 3rd St ped blinker STR -15 -003 150,000 150,000 Sidewalk Gap Improvement Project (TBD) STR -15 -004 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 1,000,000 95th Street Extension w/o noise wall STR -16 -001 1,000,000 100,000 1,100,000 Flashing Yellow Arrow - Signal Improvements STR -16 -002 60,000 60,000 CR 39 /Gillard Ave Intersection Improvements STR -17 -001 250,000 250,000 Fallon Avenue Street and Trail Improvements- Chelsf STR -17 -002 1,350,000 150,000 1,500,000 Chelsea Road Reconstruction - Fallon to Edmonson STR -17 -003 1,000,000 100,000 1,100,000 7th St Mill and Overlay and Cedar St Improvements STR -17 -004 500,000 500,000 Collector Road Mill and Overlay /Recon Improvement; STR -17 -005 400,000 500,000 900,000 Residential Street Mill and Overlay Improvements STR -17 -006 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 4,000,000 Residential Street Reconstruction Improvements STR -17 -007 400,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 4,400,000 Subtotal - Streets 7,541,000 8,745,000 5,495,000 2,270,000 1,395,000 1,395,000 1,395,000 1,395,000 1,395,000 1,395,000 30,771,000 590,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 2,400,000 Stormwater /Drainage - Stormwater Pond Restoration SWD -13 -001 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 400,000 Stormwater Liftstation (TH 25 Pond) SWD -13 -002 1,000,000 1,000,000 Expand Fallon Avenue Pond SWD -17 -001 110,000 500,000 500,000 Boulevard Drainage Tile SWD -13 -004 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 500,000 Subtotal- Stormwater /Drainage 90,000 90,000 1,090,000 590,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 2,400,000 Utility - Sewage WWTP Demo Obsolete WWTP Equipment MNC -17 -001 110,000 110,000 Annual Sewage Trunk Improvements UTS -13 -001 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,500,000 Core Street Sewage Improvements UTS -13 -001 120,000 120,000 Liftstation - Marvin Road UTS -13 -002 275,600 275,600 WWTP Phosphorus Reduction Improvements UTS -13 -003 - WWTP Solids Handling Improvements UTS -13 -004 1,365,000 1,365,000 WWTP Phase 2 Improvements UTS -13 -005 1,800,000 1,800,000 Digester Covers UTS -15 -001 - WWTP Repair and Maintenance UTS -16 -001 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 1,250,000 WWTP Headworks Improvements UTS -17 -001 2,100,000 2,100,000 Fallon Avenue Trunk Line Improvements UTS -17 -002 2,500,000 2,500,000 3 Capital Improvement Plan 2017 -2026 Subtotal - Water Ref. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Sewer Jetter VEQ -13 -001 400,000 400,000 SCADA System - Sewage VEQ -13 -004 700,000 700,000 Truck - Regular Cab 4X4 VEQ -13 -002 25,000 - Public Works Cartegraph VEQ -15 -005 1,000,000 - Subtotal - Sewage MCC -13 -005 1,095,000 4,575,000 2,040,000 2,760,600 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 12,120,600 Utility - Water MCC -13 -006 65,000 65,000 Annual Water System Improvements UTW -13 -001 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,500,000 Core Street Water Improvements UTW -13 -001 20,000 - Water Treatment Facility UTW -13 -002 100,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 Well #6 UTW -13 -003 30,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Watermain - 90th Street to Chelsea UTW -13 -004 45,000 10,000 10,000 - Booster Station Upgrade UTW -13 -005 130,000 12,000 130,000 Meter MXUs UTW -15 -001 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 260,000 Hart Boulevard water main upsize UTW -17 -001 100,000 100,000 Truck - Regular Cab 4X4 VEQ -13 -002 60,000 90,000 150,000 SCADA System - Water VEQ -13 -003 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 - Public Works Cartegraph VEQ -15 -005 30,000 - Subtotal - Water 445,000 215,000 1,415,000 215,000 4,650,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 7,690,000 Monticello Community Center Movable Walls MCC -13 -001 25,000 25,000 Splash Park MCC -13 -002 1,000,000 1,000,000 New Roofs MCC -13 -005 100,000 100,000 200,000 Parking Lot Improvements MCC -13 -006 65,000 65,000 Romp n Stomp Addition MCC -14 -001 50,000 50,000 Fitness Center Bathroom MCC -17 -001 20,000 20,000 New Play Feature in Pool MCC -17 -002 100,000 100,000 East/West Door Handicap Doors MCC -17 -003 30,000 30,000 Carpet MNC -13 -006 45,000 10,000 10,000 65,000 Wood Floor- Mississippi Room MNC -13 -007 12,000 12,000 Vanity and Partition Replacement MNC -13 -010 10,000 10,000 Diamond Brite Pool /Spa Resurface MNC -13 -013 40,000 40,000 Mechanical Improvements MNC -13 -014 60,000 90,000 150,000 Facility Door Replacement MNC -13 -011 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 12,500 Walk Track MNC -16 -001 30,000 30,000 Mississippi Room Dias Top MNC -13 -003 20,000 20,000 Recreation Equipment STE -13 -013 7,500 36,000 10,000 7,500 61,000 Table Covers STE -13 -014 4,000 4,000 Tables STE -13 -015 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 Patio Furniture STE -13 -016 4,000 4,000 Security Camera Update STE -15 -001 12,000 12,000 Dishwasher VEQ -13 -045 6,000 15,000 21,000 Pool Toy VEQ -13 -060 100,000 120,000 220,000 Friendship Isl, to Prairie Center - Subtotal - MCC 132,000 1,721,000 236,500 22,500 34,500 5,000 12,500 5,000 2,500 5,000 2,176,500 Grand Total 10,742,400 19,856,200 27,127,900 10,153,700 9,146,300 3,182,000 2,699,700 2,762,400 2,689,900 3,742,400 90,271,400 4 FIBERNET Income Statement For the Month Ending December 31, 2017 Revenue PEG Access Fee USF Fee Services - Misc Other Misc Rev Television Services Internet Services Equipment Rental /Purchase Phone Services CABS Revenue - Inter CABS Revenue - Intra Late Fees Discounts Offered - Taxable Discounts Offered - Non Taxable Miscellaneous Charges Misc Charges - Non Taxable Uncollectible Expense Total Revenue Costs of Goods Voice - Technical Services Video - Technical Services - Legacy Video - Technical Services - MMR Data - Technical Services Subscriber Billing costs Video - Licenses and Permits Total Costs of Goods Sold Gross Profit Percent Current Year Budget Year to Budget to Date Date Variance $ - $ 7,534 - 100.0% 100.0% - 9,757 - 100.0% 100.0% - 15,623 - 100.0% 100.0% - 1,430 - 100.0% 100.0% - 614,296 - 100.0% 100.0% - 701,895 - 100.0% 100.0% - 143,494 - 100.0% 100.0% - 288,473 - 100.0% - 100.0 °% - 9,852 - 100.0% - 857 - 100 -0% - 16,240 - 100.0% - (26,808) - 100.0% - (44,020) - 100.0% - 27,389 - 100.0% - 1,855 - 100.0% - (19,882) - 100.0% $ - $ 1,747,985 - 100.0% $ - $ 89,648 100.0% - 613,062 100.0% - 4,941 100.0% - 96,362 100.0% - 9,000 100.0% - 138 100.0% $ - $ 813,151 100.0% $ - $ 934,834 - 100.0 °% Income Statement- Fibernet REVISED FOR 2017 11/22/20161:12 PM Percent Current Year Budget Year to Budget to Date Date Variance Field Expense Labor - Field - 150,505 100.0% Benefits - Field - 64,717 100.0% Clothing Supplies - 1,759 100.0% Motor Fuels - 2,723 100.0% Fiber /Video /Phone Supplies - 53,666 100.0% Gen Operating Supplies - 28,323 100.0% Landscaping Materials - 38 100.0% Misc Repair and Maint Supplies - 130 100.0% Maintenance & Support Services - 60,541 100.0% Miscellaneous Prof Services - 9,083 100.0% Gopher State Locates - 1,512 100.0% Repair & Maint - Mach & Equip - 1,069 100.0% Repair & Maint - Vehicles - 1,106 100.0% Total Field Expense $ - $ 401,742 100.0% G & A Expense Labor - Support $ - $ 96,017 100.0% Benefits - Support - 41,288 100.0% Gen Operating Supplies - 14,867 100.0% Legal Fees - 8,213 100.0% Professional Services - Billing - 8,578 100.0% Regulatory Professional Services - 6,019 100.0% Miscellaneous Prof Services - 23,390 100.0% Telephone /Internet - 3,907 100.0% Internal IT Services - 12,476 100.0% Mail & Delivery - 6,663 100.0% Cable /Network Services - 6,416 100.0% Training /Conferences - 251 100.0% Marketing - 1,300 100.0% LPV Insurance - 11,191 100.0% Office Lease - 6,000 100.0% Dues Membership & Subscrip - 1,374 100.0% Licenses and Permits - 1,847 100.0% Bank Charges - 12,893 100.0% Annual Management Fee - 154,500 100.0% Miscellaneous Other Exp - 785 100.0% Total G & A Expense $ - $ 417,975 100.0% Total Operating Expense $ $ 1,632,868 - 100.0% Income (Loss) Before Taxes $ - $ 115,117 Net Income (Loss) $ - $ 115,117 - 100.0% Management Performance Fee $ - $ 45,059 - 100.0% Adj EBITDA including Performance Fee $ Income Statement - Fibernet_REVISED FOR 2017 11/22/2016 1:12 PM $ 70,059 - 100.0% 4J;cc c c2xv�x- 61 wolbr�Sew2r- �ct;y �a`� 19139.701:111>i 2017 CAPITAL BUDGET Equipment Type Budgeted Amount HE /CO Equipment 27,650 Drops - Plowing 44,750 CPE Equipment 55,000 Microsoft Mediaroom Transition 37,500 Mapcom - Plant Records 95,000 Annual Total $ 259,900 Without Mapcom $ 164,900 m 0 a 0 C E a c m a a L w n mn py O, w t0 W N N C�OIO Ni { N T n V M -T N }F WVr O Do m O m N C r H m N �I O N V 00 N N N m nl cr '.j L7 ur N N W N ti O vNi C Q1 n-1 rl %L N H O Op W �.. h m N Ql V 111 UI Qi Q1 c- 0 pQ 0yp � oo a m � 9D O O V N d N a o > C V - d d x d x a VI LL I1 � C O C + O U . L d o_ of a d a. E LL < LL LL w a d w y n (D C w N N W M U d L G 7 C d LL o, w u v Q V U C O a `a C N a M i N d N Y _a c � n uain H n VOi N O O lT N OI C C O 'G 6 Wt H N N N a tNt� "� n eb v� O yy° L 9 a 'O �n F w 1 It: $ d C VNf V c t ° x N ` c a u y y o. 0 c n m .� m32 �m " mv2 LL Co-2 ia ° cD � yr E O 10 O N O O O Op o0 W a p n N N tD O r _C. lD W DJ O H N N N M g M M LL! a' m W N V01 C N N W O M 3 y f N 6 6 6 L N co O 8 cc N v0� �D N N S N pm CO tb GD YZ 00 N an N 9 M n �{ N H N i N d N Y _a c � n uain O OI C Ni 4 'G 6 G 0 N d 6 �X4 E a a o.n%o n Ln °° c "� n eb v� yy° L 9 a 'O �n F w 1 It: $ d C a c t ° x ` c a u y y o. 0 c n m .� m32 �m " mv2 LL Co-2 ia ° cD � r. f°t d V C d •t' C C H C « Q •O L J L Q o f a voi in U d= w n c A 0 -' 17 n N v a per!� o g 5�i u� N 3 Nl u m y p a a •�; �i �. ° FQ- `o o a p w m e �0 7° w d 'c Y c cd, ,a > >� I- i2 6 W ❑�� a f .� � � ( Dp d a o v '° o City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 4C. Consideration of adopint! Resolution 2016 -094 accepting bids and awarding contract for the TH 25/7' intersection improvements, City Project No. 15C004 (WSB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider awarding a contract for the TH 25/7th Street Improvements, City Project No. 15C004. This is a re -bid of the project from August 4, 2016. The Council rejected the bids and authorized re- bidding of the project at the August 8, 2016 meeting. New bids for the project were received and opened on Tuesday December 6, 2016 at 2:00 PM. The City received six bids, with the lowest bid being submitted by Valley Paving, Inc. in the amount of $1,211,764.87. The following table lists all bids received for the project. December 6, 2016 Bid Summary Contractor Grand Total Bid Valley Paving, Inc $1,200,588.07 Landwehr Construction, Inc $1,265,454.49 New Look Contracting, Inc. $1,270,897.42 Meyer Contracting, Inc. $1,434,719.32 Park Construction Company $1,463,365.10 Veit & Company, Inc $1,480,621.00 Engineers Estimate $1,279,493.97 A summary and tabulation of the bids is attached. As a comparison, the original project bid on August 4, 2016 and included two bids as follows: August 4, 2016 Bid Summary Contractor Grand Total Bid Landwehr Construction Inc. $1,398,670.10 New Look Contracting, Inc. $1,779,374.00 Engineers Estimate $1,174,193.40 The new low bid resulted in a bid reduction of approximately $198,082 from the original low bid amount. The reduced bid price was primarily due to a reduction in general items such as mobilization costs, concrete work, aggregate base, signal work, traffic control, pavement striping, irrigation, modular block wall and restoration. The engineers estimate was increased with re- bidding to better align with the original bids received given the complexity of the project. The new low bid is approximately $79,000 under the current engineer's estimate. City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 MnDOT is reviewing the bids and is expected to provide a letter concurring with the bids by the Council meeting date. The project specifications stipulate that work is to start by May 15, 2017 at the latest and be complete by July 10, 2017. The project will be constructed in stages with a staging plan and schedule submitted by the contractor for City and MnDOT review and approval. Lane closures on TH 25 will not be allowed during the hours of 5:30 am to 7:00 pm Saturday thru Thursday and between 5:30 am and midnight on Friday. This means that likely a majority of the project will be constructed at night. Lane closures along 7th Street will be allowed during the daytime as long as one lane of traffic in each direction is maintained and access to adjacent businesses is maintained. 7th Street may be closed at night between 5:30 am and 7:00 pm with a detour route on Cedar Street 6th Street. An open house will be scheduled next spring for the general public. Meetings with adjacent businesses will be held in groups or individually. A business liaison will be provided for project if needed. Staff will assist in coordinating project information and notices via social media. Al. Budget Impact: With the current low bid amount from Valley Paving, Inc, the total estimated project cost for the TH 25 and 7th Street intersection improvements totals $1,550,000. This cost includes construction costs, contingency and indirect costs. This project is proposed to be funded using street reconstruction and improvement bonds, advancement of state aid funds, MnDOT local initiative funds and special assessments to benefitting properties. MnDOT's local initiative share is estimated at $350,000. It is anticipated that approximately $38,000 will be levied in special assessments to Perkins, Taco Bell and the Americinn hotel for street reconstruction and new sidewalk construction along 7th Street. Approximately $960,000 of the project costs is eligible for State Aid funding. The City will need to advance these funds as the City currently has a negative balance. A resolution to advance funds was adopted by the Council on April 25, 2016 and subsequently approved by MnDOT. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Construction inspection, construction staking and construction administration services will be completed by WSB. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 -094 accepting the bids and awarding the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Valley Paving, Inc. in the amount of $1,200,588.07 for the TH 25/7 1h intersection improvements, City Project No. 15CO04 2 City Council Agenda: 12/12/16 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2016 -094. B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending Alternate 1. The bids were competitive with Valley Paving, Inc. being the lowest responsible bidder. Valley Paving, Inc. was the same contractor that constructed the TH 25 /CSAH 75 intersection improvement project in 2016 and performed satisfactorily. C. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2016 -094 B. Bid Summary & Tabulation C. Letter of Recommendation CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-094 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR TH 25/7TH STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 15CO04 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the project. The bid consisting of improvements for the TH 25/7th Street Intersection project. Bids were received, opened, and tabulated, and the following bids were found to comply with the advertisement for bids: Contractor Bid Valley Paving, Inc. $1,200,588.07 Landwehr Construction, Inc. $1,265,454.49 New Look Contracting, Inc. $1,270,897.42 Meyer Contracting, Inc. $1,434,719.32 Park Construction Company $1,463,365.10 WHEREAS, the bid of Valley Paving, Inc. in the amount of $1,200,588.07 for the total bid for the construction of said improvements for the TH 25 /7th Street Intersection Improvements, in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and advertisement for bids, is the lowest responsible bidder and shall be and hereby is accepted. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREB Y RESOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO: The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for the construction of said improvements for and on behalf of the City of Monticello. 2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been executed. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 12th day of December, 2016. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor BID TABULATION SUMMARY PROJECT: TH 25 & 7th Street Intersection Improvements C.P.15CO04 S.P. 8605 -53 / S.A.P. 222 - 010 -005 / S.A.P. 222 - 101 -008 OWNER: City of Monticello, MN WSB PROJECT NO.: 2596 -160 Bids Opened: December 6, 2016, 2:00 p.m K: 102596- 16014d— IC —t—ti- Ad.M2596 -15 CST Bid Tab Summary Contractor Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 3 Bid Security (5 %) Grand Total Bid 1 Valley Paving, Inc. X X X X $1,200,588.07 2 Landwehr Construction, Inc. X X X X $1,265,454.49 3 New Look Contracting, Inc. X X X X $1,270,897.42 4 Meyer Contracting, Inc. X X X X $1,434,719.32 5 Park Construction Company X X X X $1,463,365.10 6 Veit & Company, Inc. X X X X $1,480,621.00 Engineer's Opinion of Cost $1,279,493.97 1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on December 6, 2016. d Mike Shomion, PE Project Manager Denotes corrected figure K: 102596- 16014d— IC —t—ti- Ad.M2596 -15 CST Bid Tab Summary r��/f//A WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541 -4800 December 7, 2016 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: TH 25 & 7th Street Intersection Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO04 WSB Project No. 2596 -160 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Bids were received for the above - referenced project on Tuesday, December 6, 2016, and were opened and read aloud. A total of 6 bids were received. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy and tabulated. The Engineer's Estimate was $1,279,493.97. The bid tabulation indicates the low bidder as Valley Paving, Inc., Shakopee, Minnesota, in the amount of $1,200,588.07. We recommend that the City consider these bids and award a contract to Valley Paving, Inc., based on the results of the bids received. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. • a Mike Shomion, PE Project Manager Enclosure cc: Brent Carron, Valley Paving, Inc. Jeff O'Neill, City of Monticello Shibani Bisson, WSB & Associates, Inc. rh Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com KM2596- 16MAdmWConstmction Admin \2596 -16 COM -LOR 20161207.docx TH 25 and 7t'' Street Intersection Improvements City Project No. 15C004 Consideration to Accept Bids and Award Project August 8, 2016 Project Improvements i n f� & stn oueei aEOMEnwc UY.YRUT a y ir Ir — J -,.at �^ q! ' ,' y4 •; `— ,..: + -} JV d _ - 1 ! Es IWO fl r fJJ qk6r f -10 lip 9 0 TH 25 \7t1' Streetscape �: MSe la mS • TH25 & 7th Gateway Design Uasterplan 1 � a�ceHi�n NA�IR4'pAY a•h+Y �''�. rmewtrmiiMr Ii,�Knn rrlJ I I i TO F��fY :e d .v �yv (:Monticello Original Bid Results- August 4, 2016: 1 Landwehr Construction Inc 1398 670.10 mi 2 New Look Contracting, Inc. $ 1,779,374.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 11174,193.40 (:Monticello Re -Bid Results- December 6, 2016: 1 Valley Paving, Inc 2 Landwehr Construction, Inc. 3 New Look Contracting, Inc. 4 Meyer Contracting, Inc. 5 Park Construction Company 6 Veit & Company, Inc ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE * $ 11200,588.07 $ 112651454.49 $ 1,270,897.42 $114341719.32 $ 114635365.10 $114801621.00 ** $ 192799493.97 * Reflects a $198, 000 reduction from original low bid amount ** Engineer's estimate increased from original bid to align with original bids given project complexities • (, Monticello OIL Funding Summary: MnDOT Trunk Highway Funds Assessments City Funds State Aid Funds $ 350,000 $ 38,000 $202,000 $ 960,000 TOTAL FUNDING $1,550,000 onti I ceflo Draft Project Schedule: Construction Preconstruction Meeting Public Open House Begin Construction Final Required Project Completion Traffic Control February- March, 2017 March /April 2017 by May 15, 2017 July 10, 2017 No lane closures on TH 25 from 5:30 am to 7:00 pm Saturday thru Thursday and 5:30 am to midnight Friday • Lane closures on 7t" Street allowed during the day to keep 2 lanes and driveways open • 7 tn Street full closure at night with detour on Cedar Street and 6t" Street. Project Improvements i n f� & stn oueei aEOMEnwc UY.YRUT a y ir Ir — J -,.at �^ q! ' ,' y4 •; `— ,..: + -} JV d _ - 1 ! Es IWO fl r fJJ qk6r f -10 lip 9 0 r -� Monticello Communication Plan: Individual Business Meetings Open House- March, 2017 Brochure Business Liaison During Construction Social Media Updates: • City Facebook Page • Website Scroller • E News • Link from MnDOT Website • Press Release • Channel 12 • Monticello Times • Chamber Meeting Update /Website • Board at City Hall W. Council Updates _, Monticello -.dad Council Action: 1. Motion to adopt City Resolution #2016 - xxaccepting bids and awarding contract for the TH 25/7th Street Improvements, City Project No. 15CO04 to the lowest responsible bidder, Valley Paving, Inc. in the amount of $1,200,588.07 2. Motion to deny award. TH 25 \7t1' Streetscape TH S ,9 7th Gateway Design wasterMan Enta F- � a+>rrNn Y.pm 1 r�rra�en r Ar _ v'asr -y �7iRa.lw �w1 p+urY � NlI�RlYf1ti '� tir:,.na.4rr.M.Inn l 1n• R 1�9mlulll .fled 1n1R•L e LacwM Iaw 7Faare esf Tr'. c.v u� ■erA in 5'• -ta!t iie .F[� rw Fi>• 9F'A9. k- Mfet .-1 • -1 TH 25 \7t1' Streetscape Trm: Shrubs M'mvtrtsm.m ra. vrrnlrm r:�ih sy�3 ra�H?;I,I�� Q91r4iR1enG1 GFa559S: I iy, I QFl R I.,nW i— w %.d- ,M .n^I (rle • TH 5 & 7th Gateway Design _ 1�r"Itialflo ,.�I ,. °oxirusult� Vr..nmae PUSCACIM r :I *aaraarlt�,. F&.%A O[W.V mmx MR.1 h,sn mokoDu4 J.UnM X" City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 4D. Consideration of Approval of A Release and Settlement Agreement with the Church of St Henry for $963,407 plus closing costs (JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving the attached release and settlement agreement that stipulates all conditions and terms associated with City purchase land necessary to make the connection from the Fallon Avenue overpass to Seventh Street. Resolved with this agreement are unresolved terms associated with a related agreement between the Church of St Henry and the City established in 1998. The settlement agreement presented to Council today represents the culmination of negotiation efforts between members of the Church of St Henry and the appointed City negotiation team comprised of Mayor Stumpf, Joel Jamnik, Bret Weiss, Jeff O'Neill and Wayne Oberg. Land purchased under these terms includes 1.69 acres on the north side of Seventh Street which is intended to become right of way serving a 7 (approx.) acres land area that is currently isolated from a public right of way. The timing and financing of this road will be development driven. The overall land price is quite near the values established by each party's appraiser. The alignment of the rights of way and associated severance of land necessitated purchase of an area that is greater than the area encompassed by the area needed for the right of way. A portion of the surplus area could be sold for development by the City in the future. Joel Jamnik and Bret Weiss will be present at the meeting to assist with the review the agreement and answer questions. The Church of St Henry and its parent organization have approved this agreement making City Council approval the final step. Al. Budget Impact: The total cost of the purchase is $963,407 plus closing costs which are estimated at $4,000. Funds for this purchase will be drawn from the Capital Projects fund which will be reimbursed via a future bond sale. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve attached release and settlement agreement which includes land acquisition costs in the amount of $963,407 plus closing costs. 2. Motion to deny or other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. City Council Agenda: 12/12/2016 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Proposed Release and Settlement Agreement between the City of Monticello and the Church of St Henry B. Graphic showing general area, road alignments and land areas purchased (Shiboni). RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is entered into the day of , 2016, by and between THE CHURCH OF ST. HENRY OF MONTICELLO, MINN., a Minnesota non - profit corporation ("Church"), and CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") (individually a "Party" or collectively the "Parties "). WHEREAS, City and Church, as developer, entered into an Agreement dated July 30, 1998, related to the construction of the Church and the future development of the 7th Street Roadway project; and WHEREAS, since that time, the Church and property have been developed and 7'h Street constructed; and WHEREAS, in an effort to settle all past and outstanding issues, the Parties have agreed to the terms of this Agreement and on an amount to be paid by the City to the Church in settlement of any and all issues relating to the future Fallon Avenue Bridge Right of Way Acquisition and Construction Project. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of the mutual agreements contained herein, the Parties, expressly intending to be bound, agree as follows: A. SETTLEMENT 1. The Church will convey to the City 4.01 acres of land legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto, and an additional 1.691 acres of land which is legally described on Exhibits B -1 and B -2 attached hereto, subject to the Use Restrictions attached as Exhibit C. 2. The City will pay to the Church the total sum of Nine Hundred Sixty -Three Thousand Four Hundred Seven and no /100ths ($963,407.00) Dollars ( "Settlement Amount ") for the parcels. Payment shall be made at closing occurring sixty (60) days after the date of this Agreement. 3. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement and the payment of the Settlement Amount are the result of a compromise and shall not be, nor shall there ever be deemed or construed to be, an admission by any party of any liability, wrongdoing, or responsibility on its part or on the part of its predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, employees, representatives, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, or shareholders. The Parties expressly deny any such liability, wrongdoing, or responsibility. 4. The City represents to Church that the current zoning classification of the 1.691 acres is a single family residential use and that the City does not foresee any commercial use permitted on the adjacent parcels. 189444v1 1894441 5. It is expressly understood and agreed by and between the City and Church that the Church shall not be specially assessed for any part of the Fallon Avenue bridge and 7th Street intersection construction project, nor the future Fallon Avenue road extension and utility proj ect. 6. The City agrees that the new northerly Fallon Avenue road extension will be constructed entirely within the 1.691 acres conveyed by Church to the City. 7. The City agrees that no retaining walls will be constructed for the road construction project and the side slope required will be no greater than 3:1 to 4:1. 8. The City agrees to allow the Church the opportunity to review the preliminary Fallon Avenue extension construction plans and landscaping plans and to provide comment and input on the final design plans. 9. Any sidewalk built by the City may be constructed on either side of the new Fallon Avenue extension at the discretion of the City. 10. The City agrees to construct a curb cut /access driveway apron to the Fallon Avenue extension in the northwest corner of the Church remainder parcel at an acceptable distance north of the new roundabout. 11. The City agrees that if at any time within ten (10) years following the Effective Date of this Agreement, the City rezones or otherwise permits any commercial use on the adjacent Malone, Bush or Jameson parcels, the City shall pay to the Church the difference between the per square foot purchase price and the fair market value for the commercial or mixed commercial use as of the date the property is rezoned to commercial use or permitted as commercial use by the City. 12. The City shall forever waive all claims against the Church for any and all increased costs of the Fallon Avenue bridge construction and retaining walls, additional right of way acquisition costs, park dedication fees and private utility relocation, pursuant to the purported 1998 Agreement. B. MUTUAL RELEASES The Parties agree that in consideration hereof, the Parties and their respective predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, employees, representatives, partners, principals, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, officers, directors, or shareholders hereby mutually release each other and each other's respective predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, employees, representatives, partners, principals, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, officers, directors, or shareholders from any and all claims, counterclaims, debts, demands, actions, causes of action, liabilities, or controversies whatsoever, whether at law or in equity, whether in contract, in tort, or under statute, arising out of or related to any issues that were or could have been brought before any state, local, or federal court, or state or federal 189444v1 189444v1 agency, or in any arbitration proceeding, whether now known or unknown, liquidated or unliquidated, up to and as of the Effective Date. C. LEGAL COUNSEL Each of the Parties represents that they have executed the Agreement voluntarily and that in the execution of this Agreement, and the negotiations leading thereto, it had the opportunity to consult legal counsel of its own selection. Prior to the execution of this Agreement by each Party, the Party's attorney, if any, reviewed this Agreement and advised the Party with respect to making the settlement and release provided herein and of executing this Agreement. The Parties affirm that the terms of this Agreement have been completely read, understood, and voluntarily accepted; and that the Parties have executed this Agreement as a free and voluntary act of their own free will and without any threat, force, fraud, duress or coercion of any kind. D. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT In the event that either Party is in breach of any material obligation hereunder, the other Party, at its option, may commence an action against such breaching Party in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the terms and obligations identified in this Agreement. If any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to all of its costs in prosecuting or defending said action, including a reasonable amount of its attorneys' fees, which may be set by the court in which the action for enforcement is brought, or in a separate action for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which the prevailing Party may be entitled. E. APPLICABLE LAW This Agreement and the provisions herein shall be deemed to have been executed under the laws of the State of Minnesota and Minnesota law governs all substantive matters pertaining to the interpretation and enforcement of the terms of this Agreement, except such matters as are governed by federal law. F. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the Parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes any and all prior agreements and understandings. There are no representations, promises, or agreements pertaining to the terms or subject matter of this Agreement, whether express or implied, that are not set forth in this Agreement. 2. Failure of either Party to enforce any right or remedy available to it under this Agreement will not be construed as a waiver of the right or remedy with respect to any other breach or failure by the other Party. 3. This Agreement does not provide and is not intended to provide third parties with any remedy, claim, liability, reimbursement, cause of action, or other privilege. 189444v1 189444v1 4. This Agreement is binding on the Parties' predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, employees, representatives, partners, principals, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, officers, directors, or shareholders. The person executing this Agreement on behalf of the Party represents and warrant that he /she has the authority to bind such party to the terms of this Agreement. 5. Titles to sections and the like are used merely for convenience and will not be taken as an interpretation of the contents of those provisions or as an attempt to enlarge, limit, or define terms covered by this Agreement. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, all other provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect. 6. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by written agreement executed by authorized representatives of both City and Church. Both Parties acknowledge that, in some cases, such modifications or amendments would require Parish Corporate Board approval according to Archdiocesan guidelines. 7. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, which together will constitute the original Agreement. Facsimile and scanned (PDF) copies of signature pages shall be as effective as originals. 8. In construing the terms of this Agreement, or in determining the rights of the Parties hereto, no party shall be deemed to have solely drafted or created this Agreement. 9. The individuals who execute this Agreement expressly state that they are authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of their respective Party. Both Parties acknowledge that the Parish Corporate Board, which normally includes the Archbishop and Vicar General of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, must approve this Agreement prior to its execution. G. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the Parties relating to any claims between the Parties, and no change in this Agreement will be permitted without the mutual agreement of both Parties in writing. H. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be effective upon execution of the Parties and approved by the Parish Corporate Board and the Archdiocese. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement through their authorized representatives. [Remainder ofpage intentionally left blank. Signatures on following pages.] 189444v1 189444v1 Dated: , 2016 CITY OF MONTICELLO an STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) 4 Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator This foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of 2016, by Brian Stumpf and Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator, for the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 189444v1 189444vl Dated: , 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) : ss COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) THE CHURCH OF ST. HENRY OF MONTICELLO, MINN. By Rev. Anthony G. VanderLoop Vice - President . .. %- This foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this i day of 2016, by Rev. Anthony G. VanderLoop and Janet Zaruba, respectively the Vice - President and Secretary of The Church of St. Henry of Monticello, Minn., a Minnesota non- profit corporation, on behalf of the Church. DANIEL STEVEN DUPAY :.�.? NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA 1 t. My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2019 Drafted By: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone (651) 452 -5000 [JJJ] 189444v1 189444v1 F � N EXHIBIT A Total Take Descriptions Lot 1, Block 2, CHURCH OF ST. HENRY, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Lot 2, Block 2, CHURCH OF ST. HENRY, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Outlot A, CHURCH OF ST. HENRY, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Fallon Avenue, as dedicated on the plat of CHURCH OF ST. HENRY, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. 189444v1 1894440 EXHIBIT B -1 Option Number 3B Fee Taking Description That part of Lot 1, Block 1, CHURCH OF ST. HENRY, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, thence on an assumed bearing of south 69 degrees 22 minutes 36 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 110.93 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 06 degrees 04 minutes 52 seconds West a distance of 105.10 feet; thence South 07 degrees 19 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 225.34 feet; thence South 01 degrees 14 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of94.63 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot land said line there terminating. 189444v1 189444v1 I Co M= Ay cm OF !OT t (POINT OF COMMMEMENl) 't LOT 1 LOT 2 i .. 0 100 200 S69 *22'36wE 110.93' PONT OF i,-- S6'04'52'W 105.10' .,,,,,_S 7"19'51" E 225.34' LOT 1 ok BLOCK 1 S1'14'S0" E '4 94,63' &0 LOT 1 BLOCK 1 �C ` OT CHURCH OF ST. HENRY �- QL A , �- 1ST ADDITION 80 t ['5( ")('1 OPTION NUMBER 38 FEE TAKING: 73,677 SQ. FT OR 1.691 ACRES Preparedby: 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 w 1 s Minneapolis, MN 55416 wwwsbeng.com JEF!FF!h <!' Associates_ Inc. INFRA SIRUCIIIRI! :WiJ ::' ?_:: 1894441 189444v1 Option Number 3B Fee Taking Description That part of Lot 1, Block 1, CHURCH OF ST. HENRY, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 1,thence on an assumed bearing of South 69 degrees 22 minutes 36 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 110.93 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 06 degrees 04 minutes 52 seconds West a distance of 105.10 feet; thence South 07 degrees 19 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 225.34 feet; thence South 01 degrees 14 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 94.63 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot land said line there terminating. Parcel Sketch Option Number 38 City of Monticello, Minnesota WSB Project No. 01494 -480 Date: 6/14/16 nq CITY of Mo 66efl EXHIBIT C Use Restrictions a. That the property may not be used as a facility, place of business or other place in which human abortion, sterilization, euthanasia or other acts which are contrary to the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services promulgated by the USCCB are performed, or promoted though public advocacy of for which counseling is given which promotes and/or encourages individuals to obtain such services. Prohibited facilities or places of business shall include, but are not limited to, abortion clinics, fertility clinics and surrogacy clinics. b. That the property may not be used as a facility, place of business or other place in which pornographic or soft pornographic books, pictures, discs, or other media or materials, including any electronic forms of media, are directed to an adult rather than a general audience or clientele are displayed, sold, rented or otherwise made available for viewing. C. That the property may not be used as a facility, place of business or other place in which a tavern, bar, night club, dance hall or dance club is operated, or in which is operated a restaurant or other retail business where alcoholic beverages are sold unless the restaurant or other retail business where alcoholic beverages are sold: (1) has a seating capacity for at least 50 guests in its formal dining area; (2) has a full- service menu available with meals prepared on site within a Minnesota Department of Health licensed commercial kitchen each day the establishment is open for business; and (3) all meals are regularly served at tables to the general public and shall employ an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable services to its guests, or which has been approved in writing by the Church of St. Henry. d. That the property may not be used as a facility, place of business or other place in which live performances directed to an adult audience rather than the general public are operated or conducted. 189444v1 189444v1 ate_ i it 4tr 41b Parcel Information City of Monticello, Minnesota CHURCH OF ST. HENRY #i M i• � ' • ' 4 + i s nth\ treet R � City of Monticello to Acquire a R e Railro d v a 4* °40' l tt d�'P 4, s Church Property September 13, 2016 r s'. f � I r t 1 \1 + 0 100 ft 200 ft Church of St. Henry Agreement for the Fallon Avenue Overpass December 12, 2016 (: ticeflo Fallon Avenue Overpass History: • 1998 Agreement with Church of St. Henry o 7th Street Extension- Cedar Street to Church of St. Henry's • 7th Street Extension to CSAH 18 in 2005 • Union Crossings Development • I- 94 /CSAH 18 Interchange • FHWA requirement for this overpass prior to any future interchange • Access for future development, schools and retail r 2003 Aerial Map: I Nkp of Moil W-1 Monticello a r 1 Montice City Council Approved Layout - 5/26/15: 1 y L - f NkinticiA i 4;&n 3A J -� 1'f t � ;5 k Big Monticeflo Property Acquisition Area: CHIACIH CT ST. HENRY -pit Affw map mm Ao*W CNrch Propaq Org;,a Chura. Pmp" CKY of mmoaft, mkwgsDba DW&MW A me I (, Monticello Agreement Terms: • Church conveys 4.01 acres between 7th Street and I -94 • Church conveys 1.691 acres north of 7th Street • Settlement amount $963,407.00 11 r] M onticello City Council Approved Layout 5/26/15 r h * F} It W54 Ak f b s i v v (, Monticello Questions? CITY OF M 1 2 � O 6 O COUNCIL CONNECTION DECEMBER 12, 2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park On December 1St, 2016, the City of Monticello and Wright County closed on the final 40.89 acres of property associated with the planned regional park. The purchase included Parcel 2 and remainder of Parcel 1, which both represent land area planned as the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park. As noted to the Council on November 281h, this land area includes a deed restriction for park purposes. A map illustrating phased acquisition is included for reference. Post Development Survey The Council will find attached a copy of the post- development survey the Community Development Department will be sending in December to all 2016 land use applicants. The survey provides an opportunity for a qualitative assessment of the department's work with land use applicants over the past year. The department will also be looking to schedule one -on -one post - development interviews with projects representative of the 2016 development spectrum for additional feedback. The goal of both process to better department processes and service. ii wa N W*B May 2008 BERTRAM 5 C H A I N O F Feet LAKES 0 400 800 1,600 REGIONAL PARK CITY O F ,Monticello Wright County Parks —� g Y CITY OF Monticeflo CITY OF MONTICELLO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: (763) 295 -2711 Fax: (753) 295 -4404 Email: commdev @ci.monticello.mn.us POST DEVELOPMENT SURVEY The City of Monticello strives to provide excellent service to citizen customers and the development community. Please help us reach this goal by taking a few minutes to tell us about your experience with the planning and development process in Monticello. This information will be used by the Community Development Department to help us serve you better. 1. Please circle the occupation that best describes your role in the development process in Monticello: Land Developer Commercial Building Contractor or Project Manager Home Builder Realtor Developer's Engineer Architect Local Business /Property Owner Other: 2. At the beginning of the development process in Monticello, did our staff provide you with adequate information about the design standards and review process? Circle One: YES /NO 3. Throughout the development process, did you receive the assistance and communication you needed to keep your project or required to move forward to completion? Circle One: YES /NO 4. Help us define service enhancement areas that will help you the most. Please check the box that best reflects your experience with the service areas. For areas rated Improvement Requested, please explain, make suggestions, cite examples, etc. Excellent Satisfactory Improvement Requested Clarity of Application Materials Helpfulness & Cooperation Staff Availability for Assistance Staff Professionalism Timeliness of Planning Review Timeliness of Engineering Review Timeliness of Building Review Staff Response Time Creative Problem Solving 5. What are your overall views of Monticello based on the following statements: a) Monticello staff worked proactively with me as a partner to define and overcome development problems or issues. Circle One: YES /NO b) The plan review and /or construction process I experienced encourages me to invest in future projects in Monticello. Circle One: YES /NO c) I would recommend Monticello to other builders /developers. Circle One: YES /NO 6. If Monticello could improve one or two aspects of its planning/development review process, what would you recommend? 7. Would you be willing to provide additional feedback as part of this survey? Circle One: YES /NO If yes, please provide your contact information: 8. Please share any other comments or suggestions in the space below. Please return completed survey to: Tacob .thunder @ci.monticello.mn.us THANK YOU FOR COMPLETING THIS SURVEY. Your feedback will help us improve our service. Excellent Satisfactory Improvement Requested Thoroughness of Review Clarity of Process Requirements & Timelines Consistent Application of Regulations Use of Technology — Availability of online resources and information for your application submittal 5. What are your overall views of Monticello based on the following statements: a) Monticello staff worked proactively with me as a partner to define and overcome development problems or issues. Circle One: YES /NO b) The plan review and /or construction process I experienced encourages me to invest in future projects in Monticello. Circle One: YES /NO c) I would recommend Monticello to other builders /developers. Circle One: YES /NO 6. If Monticello could improve one or two aspects of its planning/development review process, what would you recommend? 7. Would you be willing to provide additional feedback as part of this survey? Circle One: YES /NO If yes, please provide your contact information: 8. Please share any other comments or suggestions in the space below. Please return completed survey to: Tacob .thunder @ci.monticello.mn.us THANK YOU FOR COMPLETING THIS SURVEY. Your feedback will help us improve our service. CITY OF Montkeflo COUNCIL CONNECTION NOVEMBER, 2016 9]►V ` +I Transactions November 2016, the DMV processed 4,962 transactions, 612 more than November 2015. DMV year -to date revenue is $516,556.71 an increase of $26,046.82 or 5.3% more than the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison November November November November November November 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 80,000 70,202 70,000 66,487 60,000 57,025 57,447 _ 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 November November November November November November 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 izmCITY OF 11 i -4�O�CO COUNCIL CONNECTION DECEMBER 12, 2016 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT November & December Meeting Summary November 3, 2016 - Meeting with Groebner Meeting with Joe Groebner to discuss possible adjustments of expansion project parameters; place outdoor storage under roof and review potential financial assistance resources. November 4, 2016 - Meeting with Wayne Elam, Commercial Realty Solutions Finalize City owned property listing agreements November 4, 2016 - Community Developers Meeting Attended lunch meeting with neighboring community development staff; best practices and project sharing November 8, 2016 — Meeting with business prospect Meeting with business prospect to review available lots in Otter Creek Park and discuss financial assistance resources November 9, 2016 — Mills Fleet Farm Groundbreaking Event Attended groundbreaking and photo op event November 9, 2016 — Meeting with Kevin Steffensmeir, Riverwood Bank Introductory meeting, review of financial resource programs November 15, 2016 —Chamber of Commerce Luncheon November 15, 2016 — Greater MSP Annual Meeting Event in Minneapolis November 16, 2016 — CentraCare - Monticello Community Breakfast Event November 21, 2016 Meeting with April Studer, Studer Chiropractic Clinic Review of proposed project and remodeling concepts for 349 West Broadway November 21, 2016 — Meeting with local property owner Council Connection — 12/12/16 November 21, 2016 — Arrangements made with Preferred Title for closing of 1022 West River Street November 29, 2016 — Special EDA meeting - Small Area Study interviews December 1, 2016 — MN -DEED Redevelopment Grant Workshop Attended workshop regarding grant application eligibility and process, Willmar, MN December 2, 2016 — Meeting with Groebner Continue discussing possible site location options and financial assistance package December 7, 2016 — Follow up meeting with prospect Discuss possible sites in Otter Creek Business Park and outline process steps Pv CITY C7 F O 1� M .� O COUNCIL CONNECTION DECEMBER 12, 2016 FIBERNET 2017 Operating and Capital Budgets Per the management agreement between the City of Monticello and Arvig, Arvig will prepare an annual budget of operating revenues and expenses and capital expenditures for FiberNet. In late November staff from Arvig and the City met to review the proposed budgets for 2017. Arvig plans to continue to operate off of the 2017 operating and capital budgets approved by the City Council as Exhibit A of the management agreement. These budgets are attached here as a reference. Subscriber Projections: List of Expenses in Fixed Fee: Labor - Support Benefits - Support Gen Operating Supplies Professional Services - Audit Legal Fees Management Services (GM) Professional Services - Billing Regulatory Professional Services Miscellaneous Prof Services Telephone /Internet Internal IT Services Mail & Delivery Cable /Network Services Training /Conferences Marketing LPV Insurance Office Lease Repair & Maint - Buildings Building /Room Rental Write Offs Dues Membership & Subscrip Licenses and Permits Bank Charges Labor - Field Benefits - Field Clothing Supplies Motor Fuels Fiber /Video /Phone Supplies Gen Operating Supplies Landscaping Materials Misc Repair and Maint Supplies Small Tools Maintenance & Support Services Miscellaneous Prof Services Gopher State Locates Travel Expense Training /Conferences Electric Water /Sewer Refuse /Recycling Services Repair & Maint - Buildings /Systems Repair & Maint - Mach & Equip Repair & Maint - Vehicles Vehicle lease expense Miscellaneous Other Exp 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Voice Subscribers 620 632 677 690 690 Video Subscribers 745 820 860 886 913 Internet Subscribers 1,542 1,619 1,781 1,870 1,964 Total Customer Count 1,725 1,811 1,938 2,035 2,137 Five Year List of Capital Expenses: PICO Head End Unit - Analog 29,500 Equip for Arvig HE - Add'I Channels 40,000 27,650 Drops - Plowing 1,790 44,750 35,800 44,750 44,750 STBs 1,400 26,250 14,000 9,100 9,450 GigCenters 1,000 19,250 40,500 22,250 23,500 Accedian NIDs 1,310 9,500 5,425 8,600 10,000 Mapcom - Plant Records 95,000 Microsoft Mediaroom Transition 37,500 37,500 55,038 55,821 TOTAL - Yearly $ 75,000 $ 259,899 $ 133,224 $ 139,738 $ 143,521 List of Expenses in Fixed Fee: Labor - Support Benefits - Support Gen Operating Supplies Professional Services - Audit Legal Fees Management Services (GM) Professional Services - Billing Regulatory Professional Services Miscellaneous Prof Services Telephone /Internet Internal IT Services Mail & Delivery Cable /Network Services Training /Conferences Marketing LPV Insurance Office Lease Repair & Maint - Buildings Building /Room Rental Write Offs Dues Membership & Subscrip Licenses and Permits Bank Charges Labor - Field Benefits - Field Clothing Supplies Motor Fuels Fiber /Video /Phone Supplies Gen Operating Supplies Landscaping Materials Misc Repair and Maint Supplies Small Tools Maintenance & Support Services Miscellaneous Prof Services Gopher State Locates Travel Expense Training /Conferences Electric Water /Sewer Refuse /Recycling Services Repair & Maint - Buildings /Systems Repair & Maint - Mach & Equip Repair & Maint - Vehicles Vehicle lease expense Miscellaneous Other Exp Pv CITY C7 F O 1� M .� O COUNCIL CONNECTION DECEMBER 12, 2016 HI -WAY LIQUORS Holiday Show Update This year's traditional Hi -Way Liquors Fall Wine Tasting was renamed Hi -Way Liquors Holiday Show. It was reformatted slightly to feature both wines and seasonal liqueurs, and also showcased a table of available gift sets and entertaining ideas for the holiday season. Our event was catered by Von Hanson s, and the food was raved about all night. The day of the tasting we had blizzard conditions; however, travel cleared up before the 7pm start time. Out of 108 tickets sold, 100 people attended the event that evening. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 11/30/2016 Total Sales Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 ■ 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Aug Sep CYM -LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 249,670.43 $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 -4.1% -4.1% Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 4.3% -0.1% Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 3.4% 1.1% Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 1.8% 1.3% May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 -7.7% -1.0% Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 -0.8% -1.0% Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 -2.8% -1.3% Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 -1.7% -1.3% Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 2.0% -1.0% Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 -1.2% -1.0% Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 -6.3% -1.5% Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 - Total $4,067,185.19 $4,351,038.78 $4,476,911.24 $4,652,921.53 $4,845,781.08 $5,045,614.65 $5,165,741.40 $5,492,060.85 $ 4,848,295.06 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (643,765.79) Change % 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -11.7% $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Jan Feb Mar Monthly Hi -Way Sales Apr May Jun Jul ■ 2008 ■ 2009 E2010 ■ 2011 m 201 ■ 2013 _ 2014 2015 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec m 2016 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 11/30/2016 Beer Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CYM -LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 122,218.36 $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 -7.8% -7.8% Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 6.4% -1.2% Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 3.2% 0.3% Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 3.8% 1.3% May 201,232.14 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 -3.4% 0.1% Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 -0.1% 0.1% Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 -1.8% -0.3% Aug 226,653.65 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 -1.1% -0.4% Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 2.2% -0.1% Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 -4.5% -0.5% Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 3.0% -0.3% Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 Total $2,066,536.61 $2,187,948.04 $2,289,800.74 $2,328,734.96 $2,483,194.18 $2,539,167.70 $2,604,942.46 $2,763,477.59 $ 2,515,170.77 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ (248,306.82) Change % 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% -9.0% Monthly Beer Sales $350,000 ■ 2008 $300,000 ■ 2009 $250,000 ■ 2010 $200,000 - ■ 2011 $150,000 ■ 2012 $100,000 ! ■ 2013 ■ 2014 $50,000 ■ 2015 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 02016 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 11/30/2016 Liquor Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CYM -LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 73,930.87 $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 -0.3% -0.3% Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 0.8% 0.2% Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 0.5% 0.3% Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 1.8% 0.7% May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 -7.9% -1.3% Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 -0.7% -1.2% Jul 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 150,173.35 -3.4% -1.5% Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 -0.4% -1.4% Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 0.7% -1.2% Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 -8.5% -2.0% Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 1.5% -1.6% Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 Total $1,129,350.74 $1,214,816.54 $1,251,447.54 $1,343,108.97 $1,396,520.80 $1,506,776.00 $1,546,117.83 $1,634,197.68 $ 1,419,572.21 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (214,625.47) Change % 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -13.1% Monthly Liquor Sales $250,000 ■ 2008 $200,000 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 $150,000 ` ■ 2011 $100,000 r ■ 2012 w2013 $50,000 — m 2014 2015 $- kilt — I I I - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 02016 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 11/30/2016 Wine Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CYM -LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 30,700.42 $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ 60,454.56 -1.1% -1.1% Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 64,797.38 3.5% 1.2% Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 71,840.82 7.0% 3.3% Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 61,268.24 -3.2% 1.7% May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 87,333.35 -20.3% -4.9% Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 54,889.39 -7.0% -5.2% Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 60,750.62 -8.0% -5.6% Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 60,015.78 -5.6% -5.6% Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 65,294.31 5.0% -4.5% Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 89,005.29 27.1% -1.3% Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 83,896.45 -31.8% -5.9% Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 Total $ 492,182.87 $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ 759,546.19 Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ (168,185.65) Change % 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% -18.1% $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 Monthly Wine Sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 2013 2014 2015 ■ 2016 ACITY OF MW4 mm O 1� O COUNCIL CONNECTION DECEMBER 12, 2016 MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER Upstairs Fitness Area Improvements The upstairs fitness area is currently getting a new look! Public Works employees are busy painting and installing new wainscoting to the walls. The wainscoting is made up of eight foot long, durable plastic sheets, which will provide wall protection against weights and heavy use. Please see the pictures below. Council Connection — dd/mm/yy CITY OF M 1 2 � O 6 O COUNCIL CONNECTION DECEMBER 12, 2016 PARKS DEPARTMENT Staff is working on the following tasks: • Chipping requests. • Cemetery; selling and locating graves. • Locating Riverside grave lot pins. • Equipment /vehicle repairs. • Park rental setups. • Routine building maintenance. • Soil samples. • Snow equipment changeover. • Plowing. Updates: Rink Flooding: Staff began flooding the outdoor ice skating rinks at 4t'' Street Park and West Bridge Park on Tuesday, December 6th. If temperatures remain consistently below freezing for the next week, ice should be ready for skating prior to schools letting out for Christmas vacation. MCC Repairs: Parks Staff has been making repairs at the Community Center, including the weight room, the warehouse and the walking track area. Staff has also been communicating general preventive maintenance needs at the MCC. STREET DEPARTMENT Shop: The shop has been busy doing normal maintenance on equipment and vehicles with other repairs as listed: • Replaced rear springs and DOT unit #116. • Replaced ignition coils on unit #128. Council Connection — 12/12/2016 • Replaced hydraulic hoses on unit #107. • Winterized unit #108 Elgin Sweeper, unit #132 Tymco sweeper, unit #128 asphalt. roller, unit #136 asphalt tack tanker, unit #115 water truck, and unit #137 crack seal tanker. • Replaced hydraulic hose for plow on unit #109. • DOT unit #107. Streets: • Sign repairs in various areas. • Street light and stop light repairs. Stormwater: • Stormwater outfall inspections Snow Removal: • Hauled snow from parking lots. • The high temp for November was 70 degrees and the low was 20 degrees, with a total of 12 inches of snow for the month. Full plow crews were out twice. SEWER & WATER DEPARTMENT The Sewer & Water Department has been working on the following items. • Lift station cleaning is completed. • Lift station maintenance on pumps and generators is halfway done. • Installing Neptune radio readers in the River Mill area (60 accounts left out of 264 total accounts). • Letters to go out the week of Dec. 19 in the Klein Farm area. A total of 403 accounts to install radio reading units on water meters. That is the last route to be complete and then the entire town can be read with a drive -by Sensus or Neptune unit. • Water samples. • Locates. • Changing out fluoride tanks and tubing for Wells 3, 4 and 5. • Building, equipment, and truck maintenance. • Fire truck maintenance on ladder 1, engine 4 and utility 1. • Working on Monticello Water Supply Plan for the DNR. • On Dec. 13t" staff will be reading all the water meters in the city for a test run. • Will begin reading water meters for billing on Jan 3, 2017. Page 1 of 13 Subscribe Share ° Past Issues Translate RSS View this email in your browser cedp /C (jT Wright County Economic 0evOopment Partnership December 2o16 Newsletter In This Issue From the Director 2016 Annual Meeting WCEDP Award Nominations Holiday Social • Deck the Halls @ Sturgis Park in Buffalo CMJTS - Transportation Career Expo & Hiring Event • UMC Article Mills Fleet Farm Hosts Groundbreaking Albertville Approves first step for "Mall of Enterainment" • Industrial Louvers Expanding • Business Fills Vacancy in Annandale's Downtown • Fountain & Finds offers customers a flimpse into the past • Ceremony gets construction started on new Allina Health Clinic in Buffalo • Grindstone Construction Services picdked for County Job City of Buffalo recognized for road safety improvements • Mission Statement • Member Investor Info • Advertise in our newsletter • Contact /Social Media Info From the Executive Director Monthly, the Wright County Economic Development Partnership distributes the newsletter, PARTNER NEWS. Wright County businesses and communities have a lot to be proud of and the WCEDP would like to use this newsletter to promote the positive things that happen in Wright County, tools to assist you and facts that make Wright County a special place to live, work and play. Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services ( CMJTS) recently hired Jenn Russell as their Economic Development Coordinator. She will be working on developing the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) for the Central Minnesota Quad Counties. The counties served will be: Benton, Sherburne, Stearns and Wright Counties. The CEDS is designed to bring together the public and private sectors in the creation of an economic roadmap to diversify and strengthen regional economies. The CEDS is an active planning tool and thus includes an important monitoring and implementation component. Cities and counties will provide CMJTS with their priority project lists to become eligible for EDA funds. CMJTS will collaborate with all cities and counties to create one document to serve the region. A CEDS is required in order to apply for federal funding under EDA's Public Works or Economic Adjustment Assistance Programs. Ms. Russell will be meeting with local community and Economic Development professionals within the region to identify, review, and discuss Page 1 of 13 12/8/2016 Page 2 of 13 issues and opportunities within each community. These meetings will help seek stakeholder input to make sure the local CEDS is a document useful for regional staff and the communities served. Again, PARTNER NEWS, is for you. Help us spread the word that Wright County is a special and progressive county. Duane Northagen WCEDP Executive Director Upcoming Events /rc e- c p 2016 Annual Meeting WrighrC:ounrg & Awards Ceremony Economic Development Partnership January 20, 2016 — 7t30om at St. Michael Community Center Sponsored by - 7 XceiEnergy Guest spy Ratt Uirtz, Eederaf Reserve Bankof 91fuumpaoCts Ran Wirtz is a regional outreach director at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Ron's primary responsibilities involve trucking construcAan and real estate markets, along with trends in employment, wages and prices in the Ninth District —an area that covers Minnesota, North and South Dakota, Montana and portions of Wisconsin and Michigan. Prior to that Ron was long -time editor of the fedgatette, the Bank's regional business and econarnks publication, where he conducted research on such topics as employment trends, health care pricing and consolidation, housing, entrepreneurship, public pensions, income mability, the Bakken oil boom and Other topics. Ron has degrees from Marquette University and University of Wisconsin- Stevens paint. Awards to be presented Outstanding Start -up Entrepreneur of the Year High Economic Vitality Business of the Year Outstanding Member Investor of the Year Outstanding Citizen of the Year For more information or to register, please visit www.wrightaartnership.org or call leanene at (763) 477 -3035 Cost - Member Investors — FREE / Non — Member Investors $25 Page 2 of 13 12/8/2016 Page 3 of 13 Request for Nominations join your cc'rleagues in -he N ght Coumy Ecr o do �e.aloynent Farinerstup n subn. d rr norm ^ations for "a Nrigt t County Rwa ds I he cee:,ratrn c•r exoel once wig be in Janjaq at t•.e Arm& Veetin4. M, -ead ycur help to dentify the ini:Mduals most dese-Ang of reccgn tc^ - the wider we cast `he -et t-e better the oaf-- nor, atr h 1^ sc' "C1 lit @1nnCIS. PA, rle ; n tr, that sill - -arn nations arc both a"^r^ T(a::o arui O.Wum Igloo. Outstanding Member Investor of the Year Award R( jC -Jz`,s a pee, rt Lit in, xt rt'r.5 ip -)1 }lei.' - o_.s>ta.".ti j Con - t .liens, lease ship & ashir v: rt nts. T ne nom rtes Must be a rm nb or of ft Parinersha, F:irtary avrhm wit De p :'s' to b..sir>ess anC p'M�, {rr,t r- -r`;. ` nn- tothePa ^,e^shi�ot�rthz:�l5ve�s itciud4g;mrmil -n -mr ri7rrii ow4if rvd-mTigrr ar-, sh r,. Outstanding Start -Up Entrepreneur of the Year Award Re,.op^izn' t .,ll �u; ,e r,. c ..,,. •;rcaAu v in'Nr,11I ':: n' :,'ha ce,nor>strate their ab ..•y L. tme i r*F, overrome c , lenges and :ttaw their Cusoess rile making an econor,c intpa;t and iusterara iou, wr s: , :ti .y in Ary,., Co..nty. `ho entiop�eneur cars tIOT heed to be a r�erroe• ;'ti, Far:r�r:r p, outstanding Ciften of the Year Award Recogn zes an o_lstandiN oitaen 'n Wright ; ounty for their corrdb_tions, taadership a -d v sign a^d the.rr vot.nteer servsa to the cor mun ry. Mgh Economic: Vital business of the Yaar Award Recogn zes bAt*sres I- 'Wright County wbr, have -nwe a, econorrlc rnpact t "PCargh Invastmems to nrr venom, jot craa- o' arw reten'lon, lob tram r:3 & retarrk.,. saes grcwth pv..It abi y & reinvestrrents, dernonstrafng 1`e r abii:ty to taka srs, overocrne cha tenges. and grow !heir b.sinem while n -akimg an economie opact and `ttstedtmg eoonnxvitaliy n Wright Canty. Nomination farm deadline - December 14, 2016 for more Wormation or %pllcation tams & instratlm, pease cordact deanene at 753.477.3035 or jsirurrowrightpartnership org }P wr+pry Counrg EC( b— D—I.P cnt Orrt - -hip Page 3 of 13 12/8/2016 Page 4 of 13 Halls A Day of Fun for Everyone .. . Buffalo's Sturges Park Saturday, December 3'l ENJOY THE SIGHTS AND SOUNDS OF CHRISTMAS AT THE RETAIL STORES, where holiday gifts, tteats and nuisic will he on display. Wide carolers strolling the streers, it hrill be sitre to get you in the holiday spirit. 9 FREE HOLIDAY MOVIE AT BUFFALO CINEMA 9 :00 AM: New this year! Buffido Cinema is sponsoring a free family Friendly holiday inovic, ELF." Lhjwed uda y B CHRISTMAS AT STURGES PARK 3:00 -5 :00 PM.- 8 Sama arriving lry firetruck Horse drawn wagon rides Warm fire 4� l lot chocolate and rrutts TOYS FOR TOTS & I3LTFALO FOOT) SHF,LFr Rc:xes will br a%ailablr for donations. hleasr bring a non- txrishable. 16(xi firm or tov! Desk the Halls Sixtnsors: B(TFAI-o AMFRt( AN I_F.61 N, BuFFAi c) l_ oNs 01 kTTRIc 13l'r[ uo Lt 'D FOODS AND Bt irmw WALmi -mr Page 4 of 13 12/8/2016 .. �� ..W You are invited .. . December 8, 2016 % 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. The WCEDP would like to invite you to ... . A Holiday Networking Event and Social! This event is open to all Wright Counlu Development Partnership Businessesi Place: St. Michael Cinema (4300 O'Day Ave. NE, St. Michael) COST: $25.00 /per person Includes appetizers! Cash Bar. (The 1st one is on us!) Please RSVP by Dec. 1st: .1strum @W rightpartnership.org 763.477.3035 Www. W rightPartnership.org Sponsored by: � crs COMMERCIAL REALTY SOLUTIONS .. ..Winrc911=e. =inns,xc-n Around the County Page 5 of 13 Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services (w",w.cmits.org) and our partner organizations including Minnesota's Department of Employment and Economic Development (httl2s://inn.gov/deed/) are facilitating a large -scale public hiring event targeting entry -level and career positions in Transportation and related occupations. On Wednesday, December 14, from 1:00 — 4:oo, at the state of Minnesota Workforce Center in Monticello, this event is your opportunity to promote the many varied career options, training and opportunities for advancement within the Transportation sector and at your business. This event is intended to assist with your staffing needs. Additionally, we hope to help job seekers and career changers learn more about career pathways in the Transportation sector and to gain insight on the skills needed to successfully fill business needs. Page 5 of 13 12/8/2016 Page 6 of 13 The Transportation Career Expo and Hiring Event will be your opportunity to recruit and promote your j obs: Local, Regional and Over the Road Drivers Delivery and Couriers School, Charter and Coach Bus Public and Medical Transportation Mechanics and Diesel Engine Specialists Storage and Distribution /Shipping and Receiving /Supply Chain • Logistics, Dispatch and Fleet Management, Safety Operations Sales, Customer Service, Account Management Information Technology, Administrative Support and more This event might well be just the tool you're looking for to reach active job seekers in our area. This large scale event is expected to draw many job seekers, perhaps just the right person for your team! We are actively and extensively promoting the event to all segments of the labor market including commuters, unemployed, under employed, veterans, younger workers, experienced workers, career changers and professionals. Our outreach includes newspaper, radio, television, Workforce Center promotion, roadway signage, social media, targeted email and more. I have included event information, the fee is only $1oo.00. We hope that you consider participating in this innovative outreach session, it's a great way to get face time with your next prospective employee. The sooner we know that you plan to participate, the more exposure you get! Please provide your corporate logo/brand /image as early as possible for advance promotion purposes. Payment can be made by check for $ioo.00 payable to Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services or using the "donate" option at $ioo.00 level at our website here: https:/ /www.givemn.orgL¢anization /Cmits Much thanks for your interest in our event, we're working hard to produce a quality experience for both business and job seekers. Page 6 of 13 12/8/2016 Page 7 of 13 Wednesday, December U. 2016 « 1 pm.-4 p.m.. 490ntilX 10 WorkForCC CtntCr 406 List 7 "' Sife, et, hlfrrtLIC0110, MN 55362 TRANSPORTATION CAREER EXPID AND HIRING EVENT LarKc-smalc hiring crent targctinK coup evcl and carer pasitions i a trartsportrrtiora and rciated att virtvas &-% oprAcolo- U, to pmmate the many varied carev oct ois,and oppamnit,*s for advaoca Treat in the transportation sectaraad your twsinfts ■ (01 r. CrE i�' J • ' z e* >✓6Yrn E+ iir .tiff '410 a i:�,.r° 96* a'-d t,44 rr :.3c#x4 #t . unt' thn taxtivws aC_w7Yimrzrjer-,r ' tY . *,ucwc t sd:1icL: ,^ai • xaw.4y vu; CUW �q • S -WOE s1 ",H 6VI'MIM iWiaii R • �_rKrir. :fix' :e•, And SCr!R trn s YiGaNi •...: re:c"wit mL'L Uaiai�i •r. i. ! iiClNy it' tt • :de "wig iri t te iabxeeken t octa" 7ew5 }•Fer"aoc, and Wamfcrx te+rer ya. :aen • ?t6C= �i.. -•AU "64'6 c lop T, wi� iM - ■ � ■i •x s.: cmw:..aAr amenrantobcenter' .UJOC ULTRA MACHINING COMPANY MONTICELLO — Aerospace and medical device companies have a vested interest in Central Minnesota's manufacturing scene. Companies like Pratt & Whitney, General Electric, Medtronic and Stryker have been flocking to area manufacturers for years to help secure innovative and necessary parts for their operations. And among those precision manufacturers, Monticello -based Ultra Machining Co. is near the top of the list. Read more...... Page 7 of 13 12/8/2016 Page 8 of 13 CITY OF Monticello CITY OF MONTICELLO PRESS RELEASE DATE: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 For immediate distribution CONTACT: Jinn Thares Economic Development Manager (763) 271 -3254 Jim Thares@ci.monticello.mnus Mills Fleet Farm Hosts Groundbreaking for New Monticello Store Monticello MN — Mills Fleet Farm hosted a groundbreaking ceremony on Wednesday, November 90, at 9am to celebrate the start of construction on their new store at 320 Chelsea Road in Monticello. Representatives from the Monticello City Council, the Chamber of Commerce, and the City of Monticello were in attendance to mark the occasion with Mills Fleet Farm Senior Vice President of Store Operations Nick Widi, Regional Manager Brad Hoff, and Widesth Smith Nolting staff, project engineers for the new store. Before ceremoniously raising his shovel with the others, Mayor Brian Stumpf noted local excitement about the project and predicted the new store would be "awesome for Mills Fleet Farm and awesome for Monticello." The new store is projected to open in the fall of 2017. Albertville approves first steps for `Mall of Entertainment' The Albertville City Council approved the first steps that could lead to construction of the proposed Mall of Entertainment — setting in motion the project's environmental review. On the agenda was a resolution authorizing preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), as well as a traffic study related to the AUAR, and a cost reimbursement agreement with developer Darkenwald Holdings to cover city costs associated with the AUAR. According to the developer, Black Forest LLC (moemn.com), the Mall of Entertainment will feature "a world -class entertainment venue in Albertville that will feature an interactive indoor waterpark, an exploration -based out of home adventure, a Sony Pictures Entertainment Back -Lot edutainment experience and a 275 room Marriot Hotel and convention center." Page 8 of 13 12/8/2016 Page 9 of 13 Black Forest said the project will be "a special place where parents and children go to spend time together while they play, jump, climb, explore, and learn about our world through the incredible and often breathtaking experiences." Black Forest LLC is partnership between Casey Darkenwald, Robert Kelly, Kevin Hanson, and iP2 Entertainment, "leaders in Minnesota real estate development, construction, finance, and entertainment experiences respectively," the partnership said. The Sony Pictures center is proposed to feature movie - making and game -based activities, and there could be a National Geographic - branded center called "Ultimate Explorer." Area development company, Darkenwald Family, has owned land for years near the mall and had indicated to the city interest in building a huge complex at the site. Although he characterized preparation of the AUAR as "house keeping," Albertville City Administrator Adam Nafstad said the city was excited to get the project started. "We're hoping for construction to commence in late summer /early fall 2017," he said. "Construction would be for about a year. The current schedule is showing the mall to be completed sometime in fall 2oi8." Nafstad said the developers can do a lot of work simultaneously with the AUAR, such as preliminary pat and zoning. "But nothing is approved until the AUAR is complete," he said, noting that the AUAR should be completed by late spring /early summer. "Their schedule also includes beginning the planned unit development concept plan and preliminary plat in late this year and working towards summer 2017 approval of preliminary and final plat. Page 9 of 13 12/8/2016 Herald Journal Industrial Louvers to expand GAGE UCHI Ednw A longtime Jelarat -bAwd indus- trial husim; ss will soon he expand - intia. Industrial Issuers has an- naoneed plans fur a S7-4; milli.m. 40A00-syuare -fao addition u, it, facility at ill SevcnUt St. S. '7h! first Phase of our espan. .ion is putting in a now paint fine;' Director of Sala and Market 4 Lira Wilson said. She explained that the comp sty will be shifting from using a dip Link process loam enclosed spray system. "Were doing that. in pan. hc- cruse our cmtlwny is extrelnety, Incased on sustainabilit %- Brfl- ton said. "Weis Camcning all our Processes to signifiartly more en- xirommcm:dh- friendly processes. Our paint line lies to change. We've teamed with Valslur to do that.Our new Palm line will ediminatc acme of the chemicals we cafm.11y use in our facility that we don't want to have anymore to he able m operate in this sustainable spaoc;' The paint lincexpamimit will add more than 350)(1 square fccl onto the western Portion Of the briklitg. IlInd expansion will contribute to eta need tow more oftice Penntual "Ley being able to base this ex- pansion, it allows us to have more People in-house" Brithm add. Fmthat memon.iltroomptny will add abou 3.700sgture lectof4flice r hdustrial louvers has announced plans to expand.. nat)!G$YGNa Lllalr .pace stretchi ng moth toward High. way 12. That expansion is estimated at $2 million. and will taccmtmodute future staff growth. including the, addition of Il empkoyecs in the nCutwq Years. "lie com tarty cxparcion into the office is adding more people in the officc and making it niver," Britwn said. A portion of the coast of that expansion will be covered by a $172.802 grant from the Minnesota Department of Employment and F.cowomic D cvcdopment Job Cm atitn Pend. Industrial IAovcri pilot iv to have the expansion Mme by the end of 2117. "141: wish it were htppcning today" Rritton said. "11 will be Industrial Louvers to expand, add jobs from EXPANSION, to Industrial Lotretn, which was fowled in Dchnoin 1971. manufactures :achitoctural kuvcrs, eyuiptnent wrests. dccvrmuivc g.rilk., sunshades. column cover., and other Find - nets (or desigrom, contractors. and subcontractor% throughout the United States. The company is kinking tar- ward to expanding ding in Delano. '*We arc very excited about Herald „gee a journal our evpansimt project, awl the support fnmt the Delano community has been tremen. doses" CEO and President Jo Reinhardt said. "our compcoy. core vane. are about ettstamer scnice. imegrity, being good cnviroI rental .rewaak, and getting the jab done. 1 believe those values arc aIsri reflected in how Delano serves its com- mm04 and tm %incase!. We am proud to he a pan of that cam- nminity Business fills vacancy in Annandale's downtown A hug - vacant storefront on Main Street in downtown Annandale was recetaly filled by a new screen printing busi- ness. the Anmadak AAvocak reported. owners Maul, Wutzhtrger and Kathy KktimKuechlc put - chaxd Krisi Screen Print and tesign from Kris Nelson in July. Wurihuger and Klein- Kuechle put significant effort into wmpletety remodeling a suite ill the Mega Mall building, awl opened American Prink Screen Printing Sept_ 7. Nelson never had a storefront, bra W'vr7burger said the.Uve will give cus- tomwr a place to look at items such as clothing. blmkcts, hats. and jackets. phased. Well be starting the facto- ry portion first. We hoer this starts in the -spring, and the oftic-c will Ix the secure! rmv. We don't know V11 haw it will all fail into place. but we wish that it wadi happen all next year" Industrial louvers employs about 70 penplc, with about half tit those cmpkoy'ees working in the factan, . and the oiler half working in the office. "Overall pay averages S21AS;' Brehm said. "Ue don't pay anyone less than SIS ifthey wok for us for store than their pmknion period, We pay a living wage and have a policy that soaks we loop n lining wage.' see EXPANSION, SA Page 10 of 13 Page 10 of 13 12/8/2016 Page 11 of 13 Herald 3 _Journal Fountain & Finds offers customers a glimpse into the past W ANA ALCXANMR See Small SutewdMr Stelgmrg into Ibuntain & Business ,loch in Howard take n Ithe Saturday ads seppirng back in time - firm dts• 1, �i� MOM 1417 display rabitnns to the ice cream, fsunlad,, the slw +�p I et - on page 15A. offers an array of treasures frown �. the pao. L C A Hours ev Ara,rding to oxt ,,aril }n v Ringnhl, vsunrem. often walk F- '--. —_ —... -_ • Thursday - Friday: into the stote and rant to knmw, Fountain & Finds is sellitng a range of antiques, such as hems 10 a.m. - b p.m, if it's a museum. b=ee of the used in the original pharmacy and Coca- Colamemorabilia. pietiful anrlrty ufamigpx.s. wCr;y U+u:AUUC,, •Saturday: "T)is k+ a place when 4' \w mminisce and bring out Horse Hineiscr said. "That happens a the only connection the shop has 9a.m.- J2 p.m. mrnauies:' Ping old said. lot - grandpa brings the dad and to its fink as a pharmacy. Fountain & rind, is stilt sell. "nu have changed. but this the grandsons :' "Some of the things that arc iogAbdaitahrrndic .nwlissell. spot mall} hasn't Out much In addition to the kuntain, da, for sale out hem Aare actually ing two Jew• greeting card lies, n\rr the yam:' siury: is +aging antique -s. used in lhc phrmnnry and ill the Go Girl! And Gina, R.. in ad di- %Imy Howard Lake ray Wn s 'The antiques ate really a big business:' Hiaelicrsaid. tion to hallmark. and visitor am familiar will, tic• addition - dust they've fur sale. Fountain & Finds is 1 - lle shop who offers laah nostalgic amunphenc Fountain wbiand to Mek at.- Ringold.AaW. ing a grand opening &rwtday, ptducts, such as homenuJc & Finds often through is kc - Wehaveagnat deal ofamhques No" 26'Frmn9n.m.tn 1pest.• soaps fmmTheSciemim and His cream fountain, The fountain and Coca-Cola memorabilia:' shoppers may tnjoy face coffee. Alad %Vifr Srxypx. and jewchy still scares nta,ts, shakes. raniRa According to Ringold, the eookics, and a neat and cheese np:,Jr by N:unyeumamn. ice cream cones. mot beer fldtras. slwp's variety of Coca -Cola uuy as they expire the shop. -Come and shop! we to and of sour c, the fatmws rmra) upceoarabitiaa tics into the .hop`s Jason Miter will be performing hem - Riaeold said. "You're go• hall amdac. 'lbc shop has m- hi Taut' a a kpmer pharmacy. musk during the earn. a% well. big to find thin really interesting ecntN added a cozy sitting area -Ow of the mason, my Ives- Featured sales during the item at Fountain and binds:' and Free wiFi. band wa� s. interested in Cora- grand opening inctmk 75 per- For nwrc information and to "am of the things I re- Coda was Ieeww a pharmacist can off t?ncicws lslnmrns, V stay opd.tcd on da, shop. like ally enjoy about the fmmtain caw up with the recipe for pmen uff Jim Sh om cool Fount- Fountain & Finds on Facrh+mk. is when we get face genera- Cokc:' Ringold said. dations hgumtcs.:n d seleeeth toms in hem:' onpk ycr Kathy The Coca-Cola items am not Clui tnws items will be on sale, Fountain &Finds in Howard Lake offers a wide varletyof an. tiques, including glassware and a'maetlques'section. ft MOW ANA ItXI.\OUi right &M A new Allina Health Clinic - Buffalo will be located at Crossroads Campus Drive, one block north of the corner of Highways 55 and 35, behind Wells Fargo Bank. The new clinic will provide space for primary care providers to serve the needs of the Buffalo community, according to Allina Health. A groundbreaking ceremony took place on Wednesday, Nov. 9 and was followed by a short reception. Those attending included Allina Health Clinic - Buffalo staff members, Allina Health executives and Buffalo Hospital leaders and staff. Speakers were: Elizabeth Smith, MD, vice president, Allina Health Group; Jennifer Myster, Buffalo Hospital president; Mayor Brad Nauman, and Andrew Burgdorf, MD, lead physician. "We want to help make it possible for every resident of Wright County to receive health care in a comfortable and convenient setting, close to home," said Dr. Smith. "We are expanding the number of family medicine providers available to meet the need for primary care in Buffalo and the surrounding communities." The new clinic is expected to open in mid -2017. The new facility will be a i5,000- square400t primary care clinic. It is being developed by MedCraft, a Minneapolis health care real estate development firm, with core and shell construction by RJM Construction and design by BWBR Architects, Inc. Allina Health will keep its current primary and specialty care clinic on the campus of Buffalo Hospital. right o " 4 - ml - *rro Grindstone remodeling Public Works Building By Ed DuBois A construction firm has been selected for the remodeling project of Wright County's Public Works Building. During the Tuesday, Nov. 15 county board meeting, bids were opened from five different construction firms. The bid amounts ranged from $144,000 to $232,380, and the low bid was offered by Grindstone Construction Services of Buffalo. Page 11 of 13 12/8/2016 Page 12 of 13 The County Board accepted the low bid. Grindstone plans to begin work on Dec. 5, and the expected completion date is Jan. 12. The other bids were from: Boser Construction of Sauk Rapids ($146,500), Kue Contractors of Watkins ($166,651), Ebert Construction of Corcoran ($179,800), and Versacon, Inc. of Brooklyn Park ($232,38o). Staff at the Public Works Building will be able to remain in the facility during the remodeling project. The facility includes the Parks and Recreation Department and the County Surveyor's Office. The Highway Department recently moved from the Public Works Building to the newly constructed Highway Department Building. The Minnesota Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA) recognized the City of Buffalo at the annual conference. The City received honorable mention for the work done to create a safe multimodal corridor for vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists with the Highway 25 /Downtown Corridor improvement project! Highway 25 carries over 13,000 vehicles per day and was plagued with many accidents and underserved pedestrians. The roundabout, continuous 2 -way left turn lanes, and two traffic signals will help make the area safer to travel. m.iurPa Wt W ruM.to.,-0Y4q} wuoowtm«w lanak:. Y*.w, •aGrt K g •rt•Iiaa"lud p.,...ee ewr lero dBa}i•1•] 1'a!t'1['d WlRvlx .a.ow«Tp IAeAm•pM•e WIrr Wr%vAr:.,k 4..�uarraWmm..n Yn IZ YMVnavrivr, d,1F1FAi City or Buffalo recognised for road safety improvements 14e Msn:a Yo61w . a4.� r - FWpibmtYitir�al`1iAr 711n �,.•, uw. .- �rMCa w.. a uw v, i.� a. sm•mw w w eaJ! >. s e�vrrN9w-,w„ rm.��.� �ms,rt+ 1Oi°nn'.'. ,r.,....,. . •arrA 55•t Yfliuf;il• 1 - >m1 f . t%r p[✓rW t9•IFYIIW brm NW. Pr 71M Aa•i NW {edar INbWI Ma IVA 3 �mla6mtt PI9M t J P 1 Wry SAraa1nn10x(d+P %r gnatr m 'hypi +[erwer Tt1v 6 . blv+ auPa•Ph�M Pdjx: K F - -b M (br 4M+ KLlm�s U4 r 1 r•prra%rf • PaVnn d the rt ad rNuw ..a P-fs m - n am t.m: aaa m a �. a. rw. War sMwra% xs.l:a+ Wep w as rf ar. vTu r.C�lr tae wp�:loe w EIg�L+al M ltl aW'kbf;J[ Wa'aair %IKO Npicin PMF'4.aar Aerp top• Y•.p •Fx.+al Y31k- �f6.ewNna •dv NWf, •,vdalraeM. PI`{i -+f 44li gMaN rtWAa, 4s'sHr Wid4fL.MmSW fir w Ick� prMlrla'. nn...r•n p � .Mr.... r.! m:rery Member Investor Information �X% Member Investor Information 4VCEDP fulfills its mission by providing technical and financial assistance to businesses in Wright County and those looking to locate in Wright County. OJA The Partnership also provides economic development assistance to the 16 communities. WCEDP is a non- profit corporation financially supported by local community governments, the county, and area businesses dedicated to supporting and creating a sustainable economic profile in Wright County. We maintain a powerful and resourceful website at www.wrightpartnershin.ore. Wright County, its communities, and businesses are prepared for growth —we invite you to explore the opportunity of working together with us to further our impact! Mission Statement Page 12 of 13 12/8/2016 Page 13 of 13 The Wright County Economic Development Partnership's mission is to create a healthy and diverse environmentfor existing, expanding, and new businesses- which in turn creates employment opportunities and enhances the overall economic vitality of the region thereby benefiting the businesses, communities, and citizens of Wright County. The value member's gain from the Partnership is both direct and indirect. Member's directly gain from the f unction listed below. The indirect benefit is through supporting a County- wide effort to increase the vitality of our region. Your support enables the Partnership to directly aid our local businesses and community which directly supports your entity. Attention Partnership Member Investors advertise your news here! Contact Jeanenefor more irtformation 763-477 -3035 Attention Partnership Member Investors Attention Partnership Member Investors advertise your news here! advertise your news here! Contact Jeanne for more irlformration 763-477.3o35 Contact Jeanenefor more igformation 763 - 477-3035 in c* Copyright © zot 6 Wright County Economic Development Partnership, All rights reserved. Our inaiting address is: 680o Electric Drive ; PO BOX 625 ; Rockford MN 55373 Contacts - Executive Director - Duane Northagen, 763.4773086 Executive Assistant - Jeanne Strum 763.477.3035 This email was sent to ieff .oneill(o7ci.monticello.mn.us why did l oet this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences Wright County Economic Development Partnership 6800 Electric Drive, PO Box 525 Rockford, MN 55373 USA Page 13 of 13 12/8/2016 Press Release: WCAT Initiates Withdrawal from Transit Partnership Date: December 5, 2016 The partnership that forms the governing board for Trailblazer Transit will be changing within the next 12 months. The entity representing Wright County has decided to withdraw from the current governing board and to explore other options for governing transit operations in the area. However, there is a difference between governance of a transit system and the operation of a transit system. No significant changes regarding the operation of Trailblazer Transit are planned at the present time, and the transit system continues serving the same areas as before this announcement. Understanding the history and structure of the transit system helps put this recent development into proper context and reassures our customers, employees, and the general public that Trailblazer Transit is successful and will continue to grow due to increasing demand and strong support from stakeholders who know that public transit has become an essential service in rural communities across the entire state. Trailblazer Transit is a general public transit system that operates primarily in Sibley, McLeod, and Wright Counties. The transit system is administered by a government entity called Trailblazer Joint Powers Board (TJPB) which is a legal partnership between Sibley County, McLeod County, and Wright County Area Transportation Joint Powers Board (WCAT). WCAT itself is a government entity created by a legal partnership between 14 cities in Wright County including Albertville, Annandale, Buffalo, Cokato, Delano, Hanover, Howard Lake, Maple Lake, Monticello, Montrose, Otsego, Rockford, St. Michael, and Waverly. The transit system is primarily funded with state and federal dollars that are distributed by the MnDOT Office of Transit. Subsequently, operating a public transit system like Trailblazer Transit requires extensive collaboration between many different layers of government entities from the local to the national level. TJPB started in June 1999 as a partnership between Sibley County and McLeod County to provide transit service in both counties. TJPB chose to expand its service area into Wright County in May 2014 because the transit system operated jointly by Wright County and Sherburne County dissolved, thus threatening the availability of public transit in Wright County. After Trailblazer Transit started operations in Wright County, Sibley County and McLeod County later agreed to formally partner with WCAT which joined in January 2015. In short, TJPB expanded its public transit service area and added a partner to its governing board in order to gain the economies of scale necessary to justify the expense required to properly administer and operate a public transit system. In fact, nearly all of the transit systems in the state started merging several years ago to form larger regional systems due to concerns about future funding, increasing government regulations and oversight, and the need for more employees with higher -level skill sets to become compliant with all the government regulations and administrative rules related to funding. The benefits of larger regional transit systems include increasing the service area and improving operational efficiency through better coordination of resources including buses, facilities, and staff. As a result, the amount of taxpayer subsidies needed to fund the transit systems is lowered, including the local share required from each partner. In essence, Trailblazer Transit needed to expand into Wright County in order to create and sustain a feasible economic model and to simply remain in existence without being required to merge into another neighboring transit system. Sibley County and McLeod County wanted to protect the quality and level of service that Trailblazer Transit customers have come to expect rather than partner with another system. Unfortunately, Trailblazer's expansion into Wright County has been difficult. The WCAT organization was created only in response to an unsuccessful attempt by Sibley County and McLeod County to partner with the Wright County Board. After WCAT established itself as the partner to represent Wright County, there were disagreements between Sibley County, McLeod County, and WCAT about board representation and the division of local share before the modified TJPB agreement was even signed. After initially working well together on the Trailblazer Board, the relationships between board members deteriorated and have become contentious over the past year. Referencing different values from Sibley County and McLeod County, WCAT voted unanimously on November 15, 2016, to withdraw from the partnership effective on or before December 31, 2017. In a letter dated November 21, 2016, WCAT provided the written notice necessary to legally initiate the process to withdraw from the partnership. The Trailblazer Joint Powers Agreement requires a minimum notice of 12 months for a member entity to withdraw, but WCAT's financial obligations and participation on the governing board could end sooner if all parties negotiate an agreement. The long -term impact of WCAT's decision to withdraw from the transit partnership is unknown at this time. In the short -term, the transit service will operate as usual. Sibley County, McLeod County, and WCAT will need to evaluate the options for the governance and operation of public transit in each of the counties. MnDOT stated that it would prefer to see all three counties continue to be served by one provider and that it will fund the organization best suited to operate the transit service in the area. Separate from the political challenges, Trailblazer Transit is doing well and improving from an operational standpoint. Employees are being hired, new bus service is being put on the road, ridership is at an all -time high, and the financial model of the three - county transit system has eliminated the need to pay local share. Based on ridership, efficiency, and finances, MnDOT believes the operation of the three - county transit system has been successful. It should be clearly stated that Trailblazer Transit will continue to operate in all three counties for the foreseeable future. A highly - qualified team of dedicated transit professionals is committed to the mission of providing as many rides as safely and efficiently as possible. The focus of the organization will continue to be on the customers of all three counties, the current and future employees, and the taxpayers throughout the transition into the next chapter of public transit in these counties. Although there will be changes in the governance of Trailblazer Transit, the increasing demand and widespread support at multiple levels of government signifies that public transit service will continue well into the future. If you have any questions, please contact TJPB Executive Director Gary Ludwig at toll -free 1 -888- 743 -3828 or at gludwig @trailblazertransit.com. Submitted by: TJPB Executive Director, Gary Ludwig Reviewed by: TJPB Chairperson, Ron Shimanski TJPB Vice - chairperson, Jack Russek