City Council Agenda Packet 04-12-2004 Special
MEMORANDUM
.
April 7, 2004
To:
Mayor Thielen and City Council
From:
Fred Patch, Building Official
Subject:
CODE ENFORCEMENT.
. The first duty of the Building Inspections Department is to protect public health, safety
and welfare through the enforcement of Minnesota State Building and Fire Codes.
. Secondary duties, though not less important, assigned to the Building Inspections
Department include public nuisance and zoning code enforcement. Because the
Building Inspections Department is heavily involved with on-site development, we are
most capable of coordinating public nuisance and zoning code enforcement.
Our enforcement process is coordinated with and assisted by the Public Works Department, County
Sheriff, County Attorney, and as necessary with the City Attorney and City Council. Our inspection
methods are even handed and based on common sense. Our enforcement approach is as cooperative
and as friendly as possible.
. City code enforcement efforts are both proactive and reactive.
./ Our proactive efforts include neighborhood inspection "sweeps" twice each year,
. Spring inspection sweeps in anticipation of Junk Amnesty Day;
. Fall inspection sweeps to address long grass, weeds and obtrusive violations in
anticipation of winter.
./ Our reactive efforts include:
. Complaint response inspections.
. Inspections based on observations of obtrusive or obnoxious conditions sucjh
as junk vehicles, junk, refuse, long grass and weeds, and construction debris.
Most recently, City staff have observed violations city ordinances in commercial and industrial areas of
the City. Observed violations include:
.
Use of the public right of way for routine loading, unloading and temporary storage of goods.
Junk, refuse and debris.
Junk vehicles.
Unlawful open and outdoor storage.
Unlawful permanent and temporary signs, both on private right of way and on private property.
Glare from lights.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Staff is concerned that regardless of how common sense and even handed our enforcement efforts may
be, the environment within which we are to carry out our enforcement duties has been plagued by
. politics, presenting two dilemmas:
. Enforcement staff is being politically influenced toward selective enforcement.
. The ability of staff to perform enforcement duties as prescribed by city ordinances is
being disabled.
It seems that we are damned if we do and damned if we don't enforce our codes and ordinances ofthe
City. Staff is requesting direction and relief from the Council.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
..
.....
April 6, 2004
To:
Mayor Thielen and City Council
From:
Fred Patch, Building Official
Subject:
Timber Ridge HI ~ Trunl{ Fee Assessments
Background:
Terms of sale, assessments and a platting requirement for the remaining four lots in The
Meadows plat were established by the Development Agreement for Timber Ridge 1. Under
the terms of that agreement, The Meadows lots were to be platted as part of Timber Ridge II.
Schneider subsequently chose to develop The Meadows lots along with The Brothers Plat as
the Timber Ridge JlI plat.
.
.
Next, Schneider chose to separate The Meadows lots from Timber Ridge III and develop
those four lots under a conditional use permit in advance of Timber Ridge Ill. Council acted to
allow a conditional use permit for those lots, to permit Schnieder to construct two, four unit
townhomes on The Meadows lots subject to nine conditions (see ({t{ached Council Minutes
1/12/04).
On April 2nd M1'. Schnieder signed the Development Agreement for Timber Ridge III - Phase 1,
provided required sureties (letters of credit) and has to date abided by the terms of the
Conditional Use Permit and Development Agreement.
Schneider considers the city trunk fee policies to be excessive. He feels that the platted lots of The
Brothers Plat and the four lots of The Meadows plat should be fully credited for trunk fees.
Staff has determined that trunk fees are applicable according to the City of Monticello Trunk Fcc
Policies. Precedents for Schneider's development of existing platted lots include Emerald Estates and
several non-residential developments.
Staff recommends that Council reaffirm the City of Monticello Trunk Fee Policies and direct
staff to apply those policies to the Timber Ridge lJ I development by Mr. Schneider.
.
~-
.
.
Ie
5.
\<,~.::' \' \ \\ \ f'C.. \ l
\ ,.~. \ '."
;} C C "'" ',\ C '
(\llIIICil Milllllc;.1 11 :U()4
LO}l!i!'n!. ~!1', ('11(1)1,
I\. (\lIIsider,llioJl ol'ralif~yinj' nc\vhire~; I'm the MC('. l\lIks and ('ity 11,i11.
H.eeommendation: ^pprove lhe new hin's ;l~; idenlirled.
B. Comidcraiiol1 of,t1lthori;jng cmnp1ciion ora speci,iI henefit ,Il1iilysis of the rutllle
J-()4/C 'S^l j ) g in1crehungc. Recommcnda1ion: ^uihori;,c tile cnrnp]ctioll or u ~;peei;li
henel!( umilysis orihe future J-94/('S^11 ] g Jnkrchcmge d~; propo~;cd hy ]l,llchin Messner
and Dodd ,It ,J cost wnge of $24.(J()() to s~n.()()()
C. Consideralion of adopting increases to the development lee structure. Recommendation:
Adopt the proposed increases to the developmeni fees as recommended.
D.
Consideration of a request f()r conditional use permits allmving two 4 unit townhouse
buildings in an R-2 District and associated request for a repJat of Lots 5.6.7 and g of the
Meadows subdivision. Applicant Homestead Multi-Family Development Corp.
Recommendation: Approve the conditional use permit allowing two 4 unit townhouse
buildings in an P,-2 District, based on a finding tha1 the zoning supports the use. and the
proposal meets the density requirements for the area. subject to the following conditions:
r
,
1. Submission of a fina 1 plat and execution of a deve lopment contract prior to issuance of ~iccup<lIlCV
perm its.
') Establishment of an association 'to maintain common areas. including the cul-de-sac island
landscaping
3. Separation of combined driveways to meet City curb'Cli1 width ma:\imums.
4. Increase number ofboukvard trees per City standards and this report.
S. Provide landscaping plans for foundation plantings.
6. 'provide sidewalk along Prnirie Road to connect 10 Timber Ridge.
7. Provide landscaped buffer 'along the nol"1h boundan' of lhe projec1 consistent with Timber Ridge
and this report
8 Compliance with City Engineer's recommendations on grnding. dri1inage. utilities. and sneel
conslruct ion.
9. Compli<lnce with City Public Works direction for mailbo:\ locations, g3l'bJgc colke-tinll jnc<ltions.
Slreel light i ng ,1I1d 01 her requ i rcmcnlS.
(Jlen POSllstJ requested that hem #5B be removed for discussion.
BRlAN STtlMPF MOVED TO APPROVl:: THE CONSENT AC;END^ WlTl.l Tl-lE
IZEMOV AL OF ITEM #51:3 FOR DISCUSSION ROC;FR C^Rl.SON Sl-.C(iNDFD TIll:
MOTlON. MOTlON CARRlED UNANJMOUSLY.
().
Consideration of items rel11o\'('(\ from !hc ('Ol1Sen1 a~('n(\a for discussion.
(iJcn )lOSUSt:l qUl'stj()ned wl1)' ilK' City did not pursue gel1ing more th:111 one q1lo1e J()j' ll1e slud, or
the speci,il benel!t analysis. .lcrrO-Nl:iJl respoJ\lkd lhal1his is vn\' spcci,lii;n1 wmk ;llId the
lJrm proposing 10 duthe study is highh Lllwlif!l'lL I k dlkkd lh<ltllll' sLillw(lIild sl'ck ,lddili(\11il1
ljul)ks i r so dileckd by tlK' Council. l~ubl)il' Smith l]lll'stionl'd i r ~I ]own ljllUll' \\'<lS l'Cl'l'ived
wutlld the Cily l,c obligakd to go wilh that one. Ii nil' l' Thielen Sl:11l'd lh:llthc 1!IIllS ml' IlH)\idillg
a service and 1h:11tl1l' Cnllnci I can select ,I sl'nicc l)dscd Oil nther !:leh)rS bl'silJcS price.
')
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
April 6, 2004
To:
Mayor Thielen and City Council
Fred Patch, Building Official ~
From:
Subject:
PLAN REVIEW FEES FOR SIMILAR PLANS.
This memorandum is to answer questions regarding application of Minnesota State Building Code,
Rules 1300.0160 relating to plan review fees for similar plans. The basis for building permit plan
review fees is the 1997 Uniform Building Code rUBC] as adopted by City Council (S'ee Monticello Fee
Schedule Attached). The] 997 UBe building permit fee schedule has been in effect since 1998. As of
March 23, 2003, the State modified and superceded the City fee schedule by Rule to allow for reduced
plan review fees for similar plans.
Council Member Posusta has contacted townhome developers and asserted that the City has been
charging plan review fees that it was not entitled to. I contacted Matt Brokl, City Attorney to have him
provide an opinion with regard to how the law should be applied. Mr. Brokl reaffirmed my
understanding and application of the law. My application of the Rule (see below) has consistently been
that a builder must request and submit a "Master Plan" in application for building permit in order to take
advantage of plan review fee reductions. This has not occurred in the City to date.
As defined by Subp. 15. Master Plan, a "Master plan" is a plan that has been reviewed for code
compliance by the building official and stamped "Reviewed for Code Compliance." Building code
deficiencies found during plan review of the first building must be corrected prior to submittal of a
Master Plan in application for multiple building permits. A Master Plan is valid for a ] 2 month period
unless a substantive code change occurs that impacts the design of the Master Plan (as determined by
the Building OHicial). Additional specific limitations of the use of a Master Plan are contained within
the Subdivisions of the Rule:
Minnesota Stute Building Code, Rule] 30(J.O] 60:
Subp. 5.
Plan review fees for similar plans.
When submittal documents for similar plans are approved under subpart 6, plan
review fees shall not exceed 25 percent of the normal building permitfee established
and charged by thejurisdiction for the same structure.
Plan review C!fsimilar plans
A. Any numher o.fsimilar huildings may be huil/Fom a master plan it:
(1) plan revinvfees have been paid/or the master plan;
(2) a code change has not occurred that impacts the design (~f a master plan;
(3) the similar building has the same physical dimensions and structural design as
the master plan;
Exception: Thefi)llowing modifications to the master plan are not considered
10 he significant modifications, according to Minnesota ,',tatules, section
Subp. 6.
.
.
.
168.61, suhdivision 1, and are permittedfor "U" occupancies, and dwelling
units huilt to the International Residential Code, and residential occupancies
built to the International Building Code that are three stories and less in
height:
(a) foundation types to include walkout, lookout, andjitll hasement;
(b) foundation materials to include poured concrete, masonry units, and
wood;
(c) garage dimensions;
(d) roofdesign changed hy a revised truss plan approved by the building
(i[ficial;
(e) hays or cantilevered floor areas;
(I) decks and porches, and
(g) other modificalions approved by the building (ifficial;
(4) occupancy groups other than those identified in the exceptions listed in part
1300. () I60.suhpart 6, item A, suhitem (3). must be the same type of
construction and occupancy classification and must have the same exit system;
Exception: Minor changes to the exit access; and
(5) the similar plan is hased on a master plan for which the municipality has issued
a permit within the last 12 Inonths.
B. Plan review fees for similar building plans must he based on the costs commensurate
with the direct and indirect cost of the service, hut must not exceed 25 percent of the
normal building permitfee established and charged by the municipality for the same
structure.
C. The plan reviewfee chargedfor similar huilding plans applies to all huildings
regulated hy the code regardless (if occupancy class(lication including
industrialized/modular huildings constructed under a program specified in Minnesota
Slatutes, section 168. 75.
D. The applicant must submit a new plan set and other information as required hy the
building cd/balfc)r each building reviewed as a similar huilding
No plan review fees have been charged in violation of the Minnesota State Building Code. Any builder
may take advantage of this new law at any time by complying with the requirements ofthe Rule.
The Council may consider as to whether or not to adopt a city policy to actively encourage
builders of repetitive buildings (i.e. townhomes, storage buildings, single family homes, etc.) to
take advantage of the new rule allowing for reduced plan review fees.
I do not recommend such a policy. It would be highly unusual amongst Minnesota Cities, and would
significantly impact development revenue, resulting in an increased tax burden on city residents.
.
.
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
FEE SCHEDULE
ANIMAL CONTROL
Barking: First offense
Repeat offense
Written/oral warning
$25
Boarding Fee:
$12/per day
Commercial Kennel Permit:
$95/year
Dog License: Altered Pet
Unaltered Pet
Altered Pet
Unaltered Pet
Late Fee
Replacement Tag
$10-2years
$] 5 - 2 years
$5.00 - I year
$7 .50 - I year
$5
$1
Euthanization/Disposal Fee
$32 per animal
Feces Pickup: First offense
. Repeat offense
Written/oral warning
$10
$25
Running at Large: First offense
Second offense
Third offense
If impounded
Licensed
$25
$35
$50
Add boarding fee
lJnlicensed
$35
$45
$60
BllILDING
Assessment Fees: Building Valuation $499,999 or less
Building Valuation $500,000 or more
$25.00
$100.00
Building Inspection (non-permit related):
$47/hour
Building Permit Fees:
100% of 1997 State recommended
schedule attached
Building Permit Surcharge:
.0005 of building value (State mandated)
Contractor License Check Fee:
$25
Demolition Permit: 100% of] 997 State recommended schedule (attached)
Permit is issued under a building permit (follow same procedures as issuing a building permit). Prior to
demolition permil issuance verify with Public Works. Contractor must arrange disconnection:
]) Sanitary sewer; 2) City water & retrieve water mater and 3) approve routing for trllcks and heavy
equipment, (if applicable).
Grading Permit & Restoration Bond
$] 50 per permit + an escrow of $] 50 for
City Engineer cost (if any)
DA WN/XC!-:\../FORMS: FEE SCHEDLJLE:2/2/2004
Grading Permit/Development
(Pre- Development Agreement) deposit
Mechanical Permits: Residential
Commercial
Mechanical Surcharge
Moving Buildings:
Plan Review:
Plumbing Permits: Residential
Commercial
Plumbing Surcharge:
Sign Permits: Permanent
(minimum fee $25)
Sign Permits: Temporary
State Surcharge on Building Pel'mits:
Val uation of Structure
$] ,000,000 or less
$] ,000,000 to $2,000,000
$2,000,000 to $3,000,000
$3,000,000 to $4,000,000
$4,000,000 to $5,000,000
Greater than $5,000,000
Uti I ity Locate Fee: Residential
Commercial/I nd ustrial
CITY OF MONTICELLO
FEE SCHEDULE
$150 per permit and escrow of $2,000 for City
City Engineer cost and $] ,SOO/acre restorati on
$30 base + $7/fixture
$50 base + $7/fixture
$.SO (State mandated)
$100 + expense + demolition permit
6S% of building permit fee
$30 + $7/fixture. "Fixture includes such things as traps,
$SO + $7/fixture toilets, floor drains, sinks and showers
$.50 (State mandated)
$25 for first $1,000 of value; $ J 0 each
$1,000 of value
$20
Addition or Alteration Surcharge Computation
.0005 x valuation
$500 + ,0004 x (Value - $1,000,000)
$900 + .0003 x (Value - $2,000,000)
$] 200 + .0002 x (Value - $3,000,000)
$1400 + .0001 x (Value - $4,000,000)
$] SOO + .005 x (Value - $5,000,000)
$35
$50
.
.
CEMETERY FEES
Grave Fee: (Effective] ]/1102)
Full Grave (4'xI2') Flush Marker Area
Full Grave (4'x 12') Raised Marker Area
Infant Grave (2'x6')
Cremation Grave (4'x4')
Grave TI'ansfCJ' Fee
Excavation Fee:
Weekday
Weekend
Infant Grave Excavation
Cremation Grave Excavation
Grave Stal,jug Fee:
DA WNIXCI'1.I1-0RMS FEE SCHEDULJ:::2/2/2004
Resident
$650.00
$700,00
$200.00
$300.00
Non-Resident
$8S0.00
$900.00
$200.00
$400.00
$15.00
$400.00
$430.00
$]00.00
$80.00
$25.00
.
2
.
.
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
FEE SCHEDULE
Perpetual Care Fec:
New Grave Sales
Grave Sold Pre-1960
Included in grave price
$100.00
Administrative Fec:
$30.00
LlCENSES/MISC PERMITS
Burning Permit:
$250 deposit to cover expenses ifPW/Fire Dept
are called to burn site.
Cigarette License:
Tobacco licenses are issued by Wright County
Excavation Permit
$25.00
Gambling License:
Licensed through State of Minnesota
Liquor: I Day Consumption & Display
Temporary On-Sale (Beer)
Wine, On-Sale
Wine/Strong Beer Comb. On-Sale
Wine/3.2 Beer Com. On-Sale
3/2 Beer, On-Sale
3.2 Beer, Off-Sale
Liquor, On-Sale
Liquor, Sunday Sales
Liquor, Setups
Liquor,Club (Veteran's Org).
Membership
200 or less
20] -500
501-1000
1001-2000
2001-4000
Over 4000
$25.00
$] O/day
$275/per year
$1 ,200/per year
$500/per year
$275/year
$75/per year
$3,750/per year
$200 (Statutory limit)
$250/year
$300 (Statutory limit)
$500 (Statutory limit)
$650 (Statutory limit)
$800 (Statutory limit)
$1,000 (Statutory limit)
$2,000 (Statutory limit)
Pawn Shop:
$25 annual license + $1.50 per
billable transaction
Transient Merchant:
Daily fees, independent merchant:
Daily fees, farm/garden fruits & vegetables
(from 7/15 to 10/15)
Annual fees, private premise
$50/day + $3.50 application fee
No fee
$75/year + $3.50 application fee
Transient Merchant: Daily fees operating
under annual permit
$IO/day + $3.50 application fee
Traveling Shows
$1 OO/first day; $50/day for each day thereafter
-'
OA WN/XCELlFORMS FEF SCHEOULE:2/212004
CITY OF MONTICELLO
FEE SCHEDULE
.
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
Annexation Study:
$22.50
Assessment Search (Written)
Bus Punch Cards
Single Ride
] 0 rides/] card
40 rides/4 cards
Business List
Brochures:
City resident list:
City resident list (customized)
City resident labels:
Comprehensive Guide Plan - Entire
Downtown Revitalization Plan
Parks Comprehensive Plan
Copies on copy machine
Copies on engineering copier
Garbage Cars-Residential: 95 gallon
65 gallon
38 gallon
Garbage Service Fees - Apts: w/o dumpsters
Disposal
Disposal Surcharge
Garbage Service Fees - Mobile Homes:
65 gallon: Disposal
Disposal Surcharge
Garbage Cart
95 gallon: Disposal
Disposal Surcharge
Garbage Cart
Garbage Cart Replacement (If lost)
38 - gallon
65 - gallon
95 - gallon
[JA WN/XCELlFORMS fEE SCHEDULE;2/2/2004
$25
$1 (Cash)
$]0
$25
$5
Free
$.IO/page
$25/hr + $.1 O/page ($.42/per min - $2 minimum)
$25/hr + label cost ($.003 each) - no tax
$32 plus tax
$]5 plus tax
$15 plus tax
$.25 per copy
$] .OO/small sheet; $3 .OO/Iarge sheet
.
$4.12 per quarter (inc!. 9.75% tax)
$3.29 per quarter (inc!. 9.75% tax)
$2.96 per quarter (incI.9.75% tax)
$] .90 x # units + 9.75% tax/per quarter
$3.48 x # units (non-taxable) per quarter
$] 5.93 x # units + 9.75% tax/per quarter
$2.3] x # units (non-taxable) per quarter
$3.29 x # units (ine!. 9.75% tax) per quarter
$] 8.90 x # units + 9.75% tax/per quarter
$3.48+D87 x # units (non-taxable) per quarter
$4.]2 x # units (inc!. 9.75% tax) per quarter
$47.25 + 9.75% tax
$52.25 + 9.75% tax
$57.25 + 9.75% tax
.
4
.
.
.
Maps: City map (large)
City map (small)
Zoning map
State maps
Wright County maps
Monticello Pins:
Minutes: Faxed
Mailed
Notary:
Recycling Bins: (Non-Taxable)
Residential, set of3 (tote)
Price per bin
Set of 3
New house
Apt - Large hlue container (RC2000)
Price per bin
Set of wheels
Lid
Apt - Roll-around cart
Signs: Fire cxit sign
Handicap post (5 ft)
Handicap post (7 ft)
Handicap sign - large
Handicap sign - small
Van accessibility sign
CITY OF MONTICELLO
FEE SCHEDULE
$3 (includes tax)
$1 (includes tax)
$3 (includes tax)
$.55 (includes tax)
$3 (includes tax)
$3.20 (price includes tax)
$5.00/set
$7.00/set
$1
$4.50
$13.50
$13 .50 (price includes bin, stamping & freight)
$8.15 (price includes bin, stamping & frcight)
$2.00
$2.65
$30
$5 plus tax
$8.50 plus tax
$12 plus tax
$14 plus tax
$10 plus tax
$10 plus tax
ORDINANCE BOOKS
Entire set of ordinances
Individual Ordinance Sections:
Zoning Ordinance
Subdivision Ordinance
City Code
Sanitary Sewer
Assessment Policy
$40 plus tax
$20 plus tax
$8 plus tax
$20 plus tax
$5 plus tax
$2.50 plus tax
PLANNING/ZONING
Administrative Permits - (Seasonal Sales/
home occupations)
Conditional Use Permit
DA WN/XCELlFORMS: FEE SCIIEDULE:2/2/2004
$10
$125 + expenses
CITY OF MONTICELLO
FEE SCHEDULE
.
Home Occupation Permits:
Administrative Permit
Special Permit (similar to conditional use permit)
$10
$ I 25 + expenses
Interim Use Permit:
$ I 25 + expenses
Park Dedication (residential)
Dedication of I 0% of land area or $ I ,200
per residential lot or $1,200 per unit for
multiple dwellings
Parking Fund (CCD District)
$1,601 per stall
Plat Subdivisions & PUD's:
$300 base + $1 OO/acre up to 10 acres;
$25 per acre after 10 acres + expenses if it exceeds
what is collected. Ifunder, City will refund the excess of the
per acre deposit.
Rezoning Request:
$250 + expenses (all necessary consulting expense)
Season Outdoor Sales License:
$150 per 60 day license
Simple Subdivision
$] 25 + expenses
Street Vacation:
$] 50 + expenses
.
Trail Fund:
$238/per unit
Variance: Setback Variance
All Other Variances
$50 + expenses
$ 125 -+ expenses
PtlBLlC WORKS
Chipping:
$25 per] /2 hour or part thereof for the first
2 hours; $50 per] /2 hour or part thereof for the next hour
No more than 3 hours per year per property
Construction Inspection (City or Engineer)
$60/hour
Dutch Elm Diseased Tree Removal
$225/each
Dutch Elm Replacement Tree at 1/2 cost
$30 maximum each
Mowing & Snow Removal
$28/hour for one operator and machine.
Does not include use of heavy equipment.
Snow Removal Private Sidewalk
$75/hour with a ] hour minimum
Rodding:
$30/hour for one operator & machine;
$85/hour or part thereof for two operators
machine and pickup.
.
D^ WN/XCELlFORMS FEE SCIIEDULE:2/2/2(104
6
.
.
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
FEE SCHEDULE
Street Sweeper Rental:
$50 for first hour or any part thereof;
$40/hour for additional hours.
Sweeping:
$60 for first hour; $50/hour pro-rated thereafter
(one operator and machine)
SANITARY SEWER
Sewer Rates: 0-500 cu. ft.
Over 500 cu. ft.
$10
$1. 73 per 100 cu. ft.
Sewer Connection Permit:
$60
Sewer and Water Combination Permit:
$100
Sewer Access Charge:
Residential - Single Family
All others per unit equivalent
$3,515
$3,5] 5 per unit
Trunk Sanitary Sewer
$2,142 per acre
STORM SEWER
Trunk Storm Sewer Fees:
Commercial
]ndustrial
Residential
$6,869 per acre
$6,497 per acre
$5,902 per acre
WATER
Hydrant Rates for Contractors:
1 _ All contractors must obtain a permit no charge from the Water Superintendent. This
permit will define the hydrant to be used and provides a tally sheet for water usage.
2. The following rates shall apply:
A. $ 1 0 minimum billing for up to 500 cu. ft. or 3,750 gallons.
B. After the 3,750 gallons, the rate shall be $1 .49 per] 00 cu. ft. or $1.99 per
] ,000 gallons.
3. The following deposits shall be taken for use of City equipment (no exceptions):
A. Hydrant Wrench
B. 2-1/2" fill hose
C. 1-1/2" fill hose with 2-1/2" adapter
D. 2- ]/2" hydrant meter
E. 3/4" and small meter
$15.00
$50.00
$50.00
$250.00
$75.00
If equipment is returned on time in good condition, the full deposit (less] 0% per month
on portion thereorfor rent) shall be refunded. (THIS IS ALL TAXABLE IF COMMERCIAL)
DA WN/XCELlFORMS FEE SClIEDULE:21212004
Trunk Water Charge:
Water Rates: 0-500 cU.ft..
Over 500 cu. ft.
Water with Booster Station: 0-500 cu. ft.
Over 500 cu.ft..
Water Shut Off, then Turned On:
Water Connection Permit:
Water Access Charge: ]" line
] -] 14 tI line
]-1/2" line
2" line
3" line
4" line
6" line
8" line
Water Main Tapping - New Services (l" only)
Water Meters: 5/8" meter
3/4" meter
] " meter
] I /2" meter
2" meter
Valves
Water Availability Charge
(For those who have city water available but
choose not to hook up)
[JA WN/XCELlFORMS: FEE SCHEDUL.E:2/2/2004
CITY OF MONTICELLO
FEE SCHEDULE
.
$] ,685 per acre
$8.25
$.50 per 100 cu. ft.
$]] .50
$ 1.25/10 cU.fl..
$20 +- delinquency
$50
$712 + materials
$1,082 + materials
$] ,298 + materials
$ 1 ,659 +- materials
$2,137 + materials
$2,8] 2 + matcrials
$3,542 +- materials
$4,651 + materials
$200 each +- materials
$230.00 +- sales tax
$270.00 +- sales tax
$290.00 +- sales tax
$490.00 +- sales tax
$560.00 +- sales tax
$2] .00 +- sales tax
.
$24/year
(Billed in July)
.
8
Total Permit
Fee
BUILDING PERMIT FEES - BASED ON 1997 U.B.C.
.
.
500 '15.28; 23.50 ' 38.78
":,l~t~,~'I-t~IE-:t'~IU~" 'l....::~:f4~,:~
800 I 21.22 : 32.65 ! 53.87
"'-'~-19!~=~~-'==F'~.Ii._L:.~'.~.:~'}''-l:~-~JIE-..
1~' 27.17 41.80.. 68.97'
____~20'Q, -~,:. 29'~~___c~=:~.4e,5 --, !~,Q.(j'~-
130Q3114 :4790 ,79.04-
1400 . 3'3.12 : 50:95---" 84.07
..__.__, --, -------------.1"..------. .----..----.,.
.1500 .. __,L_l~-,'!'Q_' ~~,.QQ... ",,?9.10
J~~~::-- ... :_..l~~ ~~_::,'~"='~H~___ , _~~: ~ ~--,.
1800 : 41 .05 : 63.1 5 ' 1 04.20'
1900---'--1'--4303 166:20-- 109:23
.._-!~I!~[ffi~ : t;m-
7000 . 90.51 139.25" 229.76
""""".n~"'-':':-:--~,6711. +~~-i~'" ~;H~...
1DQ,DP,_ _ 117.81 18125 299,0.6
..",,~1,DDD..1~~~ 19525 322:16'
120.0.0 136.0.'-' 209.25 34-5.26
13000 . 145.11 ,:i23.25 36Ii.3(f
'14000 1 1542'i"- , 237.25 391'.46
150.0.0. - "1-'-1633'1 25125 414.56
160.0.0.'1'-'1'7241 '265::;5 437.66'
'};~~t i ,~,;~.~) ~~i~g::~l~
190.0.0 199.71 30725 506.96
2000()- 208.81 321.25 530:06
21gl)l) '2,'7.-91' 33525 553.16
220.0.0. 227.01 349.25 576:26'
23QPD 23~.11 363.25 ~99,36
240.0.0 245.21 377.25 622.46
250.0.0 254 31 39{25 645.56
26000 26<:>.'88 401.35 I 662:23
271:10.0 ?~744 411.45 '678.89
280.0.0. 2740.1 421.55 695.56
, -2~Q.oD,___, .'280:57 431.65 712,~?
30.0.0.0. : 28714 441.75 728.89
-S1006 :--293:70- 451.85 '745.55
32000 i 30027 461. 95762:'i2-
, ,. . 3~iQPQ -i'3~~~t,i 472C>5 778.88
340.0.0 ,31340 I 482.15 795:55
35DDO-~319.96 . 492:25 812.21--
.'. ~6000 _, ",_~~~:s3- ~O}~~ li28.8~_
370.0.0. 333.09 512.45 845.54'
311D(j~ .E,~~~ j-522.'55 : ..~6i'2;;-'
,~9DDO,__,_,~,~22 i 5}?f!..~ 878'-8!,
40.0.0.0 352. 7~.. I ...5~27~ 89,~,~~.
41l).l:lI:l_, 35~}5 552.85912.20.
420.0.0. 365.92 562.95 928.87
4'jOOOj7:;i'.48' 573.05 '945.53
440.0.0. 3790ii' "'583.15 962:20'
-45000'- .. 385~61 59325 . 978.86
_ . _,~~D-DO ,. ~~? 18 ~63:3'5 995.5j-
47(lOO___, 398.74 ~,1~45 1D12,1~"
480.0.0. 405.31 623.55 10.28.86
__.._n".. ... _.____. .. . . n.
490.0.0 411.87 633.65 10.45.52
_... ___... - .. _....._. ._...n
50.D_Dg, 41,~~j 643.75 1D~2.19
510.0.0. .~2?:99 650.75, 10.73:7'4
520.0.0. 427.54 657.75' 10.85.29
.n_ n.".__.. . -. .. ...- .. -- --.
53(lOD, __ 43.?D_9 ~64 75 1096,84
5,40.0.0. i"j~f:l.~j. 671.75 110.8.39
550.0.0. 441.19" 678.75 1119.94
. n.n_.."'. ..._.. . -.,.-
560.0.0. 445.74 685.75 1131.49
570.0.0. 450.29 692.75 1143'.64
.." ,. -.-
580.0.0 454.84 699.75 1154.59
.. ' ".
590.0.0. 459.39 706.75 1166.14
6D(l,(lD 463.94 713.75 1171,69
610.0.0. 468.49 720.75 1189.24
.
Total Permit
Fee
620.0.0. . 473.04 727.75 120.0..79
--"63000.-'--'1. 477.59 73475--;-"1'212:34'
"~:-~~~~- '-:~F1[~.~~ m--~fr~ ... L~;~I2=
"-'-660.0.0.-'-1'49124 ~'155 75--'-'-1'246.99
-- 670.00. --, !495:79 i 76275-':1"258.54
- ~.!lDOo~_':-!~,]:Q9:E'tfff75_,:-'127O:09'-
690.0.0 504.89 776.75' 1281.64
--70000-'--~'50944"r"783:_i5:'-- 129'3:19"
,,-, 7100.0--- '-5'13:99' 790'75-"130.4.74-
-, 7z'00051S:S479'7. 75'-;---"1316:2g
---::::'731).Q,O-' ____~~~,09 n @{~tr==1i~:7.8'L
---.Zj.ll_DO 5.2?~L__ ~11.7~,+,J;3,39,~L
750.0.0. ,532.19 i 818.75 : 1350..94
76000" '-'-53S:74 1 82K75-': '1362.49
77000" .. "'S4'1:2'9 j- - 8'32-15-': 1374.0.4'"
--78000 r--545'.-84c---B39."75'-;;3'S5.'59
'--'-79-00.0. 550'39" I 846.is--~--'1397.14"
lioooo' I 554'-94 -- 853 75'm~ 1408.69
'-""8100.0 "559491' 860.75"-1420:24--
82000--'564.04" 86'F7S'-' 1431:79
---_~_~~o--..~'~~'59'... . ~lj 75-";::',~ ~_f34'
8400.0 573.14 881.75' 1454.89
850.00-- 57'7:69 8887'5-- 1466.44:'
___,n.,s-sooo .--.... 582.24 895.75 :-".""1477.99
,":']!'Q.Qo. .n~8679 ~0275 '::--_'1~89:54'
8,!!.QDO I 59134, 909.75".,_150.1.0.9,
89000. 595.89 916.75 1512.64
..._......_..... ".. ".._ ..__n___
90.0.0.0. 600.44 923.75 1524.19
.. u....__ ,,_ no. ' '"'''' ".. .", _.."-,,,.
910.00 604.99 930.75 1535.74
-.-. -.. .."..-
920.0.0. 609.54 937.75 1547.29
..--.-....."".. ..... ."...... "..........
930.0.0 614.09 944.75 1558.84
9iO,I)O ~~864 95175 1~?~j9'
950.0.0. 62319 958.75 1581.94
. ...-.-." .....-...""...
960.0.0 627.74 965.75 1593.49
.... ......... "...... . _..m_ _....
970.0.0. 632.29 97275 160.5.0.4
."-"'--,,.. ..-...... ..."_."...,,.. -.......-..
980.00 636.84 979.75 1616.59
990.0.0 641.39 98675 1628.14
10.0.00.0 i645.94 993.751639.69
1010.0.1) 64958 999.35 1648~9i
_._... "..... .' ......... ". _..n.... "....
10200.0. 653.?2 1004.9~,,_,165~,~7
10.30.00. 656.86 1010.55, 1667.41
,__ ,~Q:'lDOD ___Lj60:S0 1016 i5'1~76.65__
10.50.00. '664.14 1021.75 1685.89
_,,_,'1.0~DOO --.. i' 667781027.35n1~9S'.1~_,
10.700.0. ! 67142 1032.95' 170.4.37
___.tOBaOO' t'675.06 1 038:~L_ji1~:,~1""
10.90.0.0. 678.70 1044.15, 1722.85
flooo-o "682.34--1049:75' '173'2.0.9--
-'1IiQl)_Q" ,~,1!~:98105?35' j?~,1j3--
___'1.:11QDO 689.62 ,-1Q6g9?__, 1.150..57_
113DQP__, 6~3.?~ 1 066.~~, 17~~,,~,1__
1140.00. . 696.90 107215 1769.05
1150-00 "700.54 -'107'1:75'-1778.29
-"11'6000 ~'704.18 1083.35 --:;787.53
'-"'--';;'170.0.0 . 'I 707.82 1088.95 1796.:77'
......... I ..".."......." on - .... -.... "... ...-....
, ,_.1_!IlPDO +,-,,11.46 ..1D945~ _,180.6.0.:1..
11901)0 71510 1100.15 1815.25
120.000"--. 718:74 1105:'15 1824:49
---1"2-10'00' "72238 ... 1111.351833,73"
122000'-' : 7260211'16 95 1'842'-97
.__._..".._..n..._ ....... -..
1230.0.0. 72966 1122.55 1852.21
. 124000n 733.30 11281S 1li'6;;:45
-..-...-.-......-....... .... .,,_.. .... ...... ..".... .. . ----
1250.0.0. 736.94 1133.75 1870..69
-'126000 740.58 1139351879jjj--
. ..."....-.. .. ..--.-.
12700.0 744.22 1144.95 1889.17
.-.---- .....-...,,--
12800.0. 747.86 1150.55 1898.41
.......-......". .. "......,,-....-
1290.00. 751.50 115615 190.7.65
1300.0.0 755.14 1161.75 1916.89
1310.0.0 758.78 1167.35 1926.13
..... . - .. ....... ". ..."..
1320.0.0 76242 1172.95 1935.37
.. .... ..."....
___1_~~DDO 76606 1178.55.,1,944,61
13400.0. 769.70 1184.15 1953.85
.. ".... ""...-..".........
",1~50DD 773.34 118975n1963.D9
1360.0.0. 776.98 119535 1972.33
1370.0.0
'-,::~~1'38'Oor..J":"_,
1390.00
- 140.0.00 ! 791.54
--14'100.0--:'-795 18
~~~2DOQ"L)J,H2.'
_,__,14~QQL 1,_80246_
,.,_ '144DQO__L,,~g610
1450.0.0 809.74
':;4600.0' 813:38
..-...--.--..- .-.....--.--...
1470.00 . 817.02
--~:::j~48~Cfcl--~:_.!l~[66.
1490.00 : 824.30
..,--1500.00""-'--:-' 827.94'
1~100.Q:-- ,,_LI~,n~
152D_l:l.Q . ,J,,~~~,?,2
.",_1,5}DDQ,_,_,:, 838.86
15400.0 I 842.50
.-':-~I~~oo-'-:_L_,~~~,i4...
156DQL, i 8"-~,l~
1570.00 I 85342
'..'-.1..~~,Q.Q~-"'--.~...~,1!~Z:g,6
1590.0.0 860.70
.---.".. ...
160.0.0.0 864.34
...----. .........".....
1610.0.0 867.98
.1~~l),OO '!. !l!1.62
1630.0.0 875.26
1640.0.0 878.90
..... ."..--...,,-. -... .....
1li~Q,QQ .. _I__~e,:z, 54
1660.00 886.18
......-.-.. .. .--..
1670.0.0 889.82
.-.... --..-.."....
1680.0.0. 893.46
1690.0.0 .. 'r 89710
1700"(j"Q.'. i". 9cib,74
ml:lDO ! ~g438
17?,Ql)0 :__~p~02
1730.0.0 911.66
1740.0.0 915.30
1750'0.0 "--918.94
1760.00 92258
.--.-.... . .-.--
1770.00 926.22
178()00' 92986
..... ".""-..-....-..... . -....
1790.0.0. 933.50
...."..-."....' .. -...
180.0.0.0. 937.14
""';;8100'0'- 940.78
1'S2DDD . ."--'9"44 42
... ..__...._..n "_......_,,....
1830.00. 948.06
....-...-. . ....-...-...........
1840.0.0. . 951.70
...._---".."... ..-.-..-........""--
1850.00 955.34
1860.0.0. 958.98
.--.-..... ... ......-....-.-.-....-,,-
18700.0. 962.62
. ---..-.-.. ....-..--..-.-....
1880.0.0. 966.26
"-":;~~~~OO : .,~~~O
. ,~_~l)!lOO . . ,9?3. 54
1910.0.0 I 977.18
'f~)"2006 .........1. 980.8-2
-- .."...". .-.--"....
.. 1~}DDD .. ,j !:l.e.~46
19400.0. 988.10
'1~5,il,oo .. ..__~?T74
1960.0.0 995 38
.. "..on..___._"'n. _"._.._..,,__...
1970.00 999.02
.._.."...._. .. ...____n.....
1980.00. 100266
1990.00 1006.30
.--.-. . .... . -....-..-.--.
20.0.0.00. 1009.94
20.0.,0.01 65.00%
to of
50.0.,0.00. Building
Permit
65 00%
of
Building
Permit
65.00%
of
Building
Permit
50.0.,0.01
to
1,0.0.0,00.0.
1,0.0.0.,00.1
and
Up
Total Permit
Fee
1200.95 1981.57
.. .. ....--....
1206 55 !,l~~_O-,-l:!.L
1212.15 L_~ODO_:Q~,
",'2W75 I 200.9.29
.... -- - -".- ....-.---..---.----
1223.35 20.18.53
!jjT~-'T,~O'2il~C
1234.55 I 2037.0.1
1240 15 ---'-2046:-25
....--....-.....".- ...----.
1245.75 2055.49
_. m..._______._.. ._.._
1251.35 2064.73
-....---"... ....-...--...--...-
. _, !??6.~J:i____ ?:l!.?~.9?
1262.55 : 20.83.21
.'-..1-268:.1' 5 l' 2092.45-
. "127375 r-2101.ifg'
1279j5-Tn2110~93--'
... ..---."-...-'.".....i. . ... .-.,,-.---.-.
1284_~?_,: 21 ;zQ,JZ__
1290.55 2129.41
. _..m_...... . .. . . ..._.___.____......
. 1296.15 2138.65
ij~p1t 5--'if~t~~~
. 1307.35 2157.13
,i~,1295 . ;'~:?,1:S~.,~?
131~,~?! 217!i"li.1.
1324.15 2184.85
n.... . ......___._...."....
1329.75 2194.0.9
.....-....--- ........----."..".
1335.35 220.3.33
-......-. ..........-........"....
1340 95 2212.57
.".-.-...... ......-....
1346.55 2221.81
. -.... ."..-........-. ..
1352.15 2231.0.5
1357.75 2240..29
1363.35 2249.53
.........."'. .......".n......
1368.95 2258.77
1374.55 2268.0.1
.... ... . .. .."......-... --..
1380.15 2277.25
1385.75 2286.49
1391.35 2295.73
1396.9!'; ,', 23D4.9?
1402.55 . 2314.21
1408.15 ; 2323:45
.". .... ..,.. -
1413.75 2332.69
. n....__......".....
1419.35 2341.93
1424.95 2351.17
1430.55 2360.41
1436.15 2369.65
...... ..... . ".
1441.75 2378.89
1447.35 2388.13
..........m...... ... ...._....
1452.95 2397.37
14~.!l!i,5 . ;z40li,~1_,
1464.15 i 2415.85
....n __ .._._
1469.75 2425.0.9
.....-........ ..--.--..-....
1475.35 2434.33
---". ......-..
1480.95 2443.57
...m.._..... ...._.. .. ...........
1486.55 2452.81
149215 2462.0.5
1497.75 2471.29
.,,_._...u... .....__.._...
1503.35 2480..53
........" ... ...-...".............
1508.95 2489.17
1514.55 2499.0.1
1520.15 250.8.25
. ...-"....--.-.".
1525.75 2517.49
1531.35 2526.73
1536 95 2535.97
1542.55 2545.21
1548.15 2554.45
1553.75 2563.69
993.75 for the 1 st
,100,000 plus 5.60
for ea add'l 1,000
or fraction thereof.
'3,233.75 for the 1 st
500,000 plus 4.75
for sa add'l 1,000
or fraction thereof
5,60875 for the 1 sl
1,000,000 plus 3.15
for ea add'l 1,000
or fraction thereof.
City of Monticello Trunk Fee Policies:
.
I. UNPLATTED PARCELS:
This policy is established to provide a method for determination of equitable trunk fee charges against unplatted
lots in the City. Development of unplatted (metes & bounds) land shall be charged full trunk fees at the time of
development Such parcels must be platted prior to development in the City and are subject to a development
agreement
II. RESIDENTIAL PLATTED LOTS:
This policy is established to provide a method for determination of equitable trunk fee charges against existing
platted residential lots in the City that are being developed to a density exceeding single family.
Every platted residential lot of record in the City of Monticello shall be deemed to have trunk charges and
credits applied as follows:
When platted, each buildable lot is considered 1/3rd developed. Additional residential units, beyond the
first are charged trunk fees as they expend additional trunk capacity. For example:
Four (4) platted, buildable lots redeveloped or undeveloped -- Approved by conditional use permit or PUD for
eight (8) townhomes would pay .28 X Trunk Fee X 4 Added Residential Units--
Original
Total Buildable
. New Platted Acreage
TRUNK FEE CHARGES Units Lots Equiv. Fee/Acre
Sanitary Sewer Trunk: 8 -4 X 0.28 X $ 2,142.00 = $ 2,399.04
Water Trunk: 8 -4 X 0.28 X $ 1,685.00 = $ 1,887.20
Storm Sewer Trunk' 8 -4 X 0.28 X $ 5,902.00 = $ 6,610.24
TOTAL NEW TRUNK FEE CHARGES $ 10,896.48
III MULTIFAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PLATTED LOTS:
This poliCY is established to provide a method for determination of equitable trunk fee charges against all
existing platted commercial and industrial lots in the City, including those parcels that are being re-developed or
developed to a greater intensity.
Every platted multifamily, commercial and industrial lot of record in the City of Monticello shall be deemed to
have trunk charges and credits applied as follows:
Platted lots of record shall be charged trunk fees to the acreage extent of development. The extent of
development is to include all impervious surface area and all setback areas. Trunk fee credits shall be
carried forward on partially developed parcels until 75% of the developable area is developed, at which
time the parcel shall be deemed 100% developed and charged in full for trunk fees based on the total
acreage of the parcel.
.