HRA Agenda 10-04-2000
.
AGENDA
MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, October 4, 2000.7:00 p.m.
505 Walnut Street - Bridge Room
MEMBERS: Chair Damn Lahr, Vice Chair Dan Frie, Brad Barger, Steve Andrews, and Bob
Murray.
OFFICERS: Treasurer Rick Wolfsteller, Executive Director Ollie Koropchak, and Recorder
Lori Kraemer.
GUESTS: Scott Rolfe, Skipper's Pools & Spas
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
. 6.
7.
.
Call to Order.
Consideration to approve the HRA minutes of September 6, 2000.
Consent Agenda.
Consideration of adding or removing consent agenda items.
Consideration of items added or removed from the consent agenda for discussion.
Public Hearing and consideration to adopt a resolution amending the lIRA Business
Subsidy Criteria.
Consideration to discuss renewal of the Lease Agreement between the BRA and SPS
Services, Inc. (Skipper's Pool)
8. Continuation - Consideration to hear progress relative to research of purpose/objective
and funding for a scattered housing program and a motion of action/direction if so
necessary .
9. Continuation - Consideration to finalize 1999 Authority Cashtlows and prioritize
Authority goals and expenditures.
10. Consideration to authorize payment of the monthly BRA bills.
11. Consideration of Executive Director's Report.
12. Committee reports: Marketing, Community Center, and MCP
13. Other Business.
14.
Adjournment.
.
.
.
HRA Minutes - 09/06/00
MINUTES
MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, September 6, 2000 - 7:00 p.m.
City Hall- 505 Walnut Street - Bridge Room
Commissioners Present:
Chair Darrin Lahr, Vice Chair Dan Frie, Brad Barger, Steve
Andrews, Bob Murray and Council Liaison Brian Stumpf
Officers Present:
Treasurer Rick Wolfsteller, Executive Director Ollie Koropchak,
Deputy City Administrator Jeff O'Neill and Recorder Lori Kraemer.
1. Call to Order.
Chair Darrin Lahr called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Consideration to approve the HRA minutes of August 2.2000. DF/BB
A MOTION WAS MADE BY DAN FRIE AND SECONDED BY BRAD BARGER TO
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE HRA MEETING OF AUGUST 2, 2000. Motion
carried unanimously.
3.
Consent Agenda.. None
4. Consideration of adding or removing agenda items.
Consideration to hear a proposal from Ed Kauffmann. This item was placed as 5A.
Discussion regarding the HRA Walnut Street House. This item was placed on the Executive
Director's report.
5.
Consideration of items added or removed from the consent agenda for discussion. N/ A
SA.
Proposal by Ed Kauffmann regarding a proposed development located between 3rd Street and
Minnesota Street.
Ed Kauffmann addressed the members regarding the 5 lots between 5th and 6th Streets along
Minnesota Street, several of which are considered to be substandard. Kauffmann is
proposing to purchase them with TIF assistance to build 20 condominiums, two story with
10 units top and bottom, detached garages in the back with an alleyway to keep cars from
parking on the street, low to moderate income and owner occupied. Kauffmann noted that
this is a great location, would be desirable for seniors with minimum maintenance.
Kauffmann reminded the HRA that he proposed this approximately a year ago. but at that
time there were approximately two owners that were not willing to sell at that time. He does
state however. that they arc now willing to sell. He has also provided purchase agreements
for Jeff O'Neill to review.
- 1-
.
.
.
HRA Minutes - 09/06/00
There was discussion on the possibility of condemning any of the homes and O'Neill stated
one of the properties would probably qualify. Kauffmann states he has purchase agreements
on three of the properties and that he owns the vacant lot.
Ollie Koropchak, Executive Director, indicated that approximately a year ago she ran some
figures for Mr. Kauffmann but she would need to update them again, as well as check with
the consultant. Koropchak reminded the HRA that previously the members were interested
in Mr. Kauffmann's proposal.
Koropchak did state the project didn't seem to qualify as a redevelopment district. Seventy
percent of the parcels must consist of 15% improvements and only two of those lots meet the
criteria. Koropchak also mentioned the option of a housing district where the developer
would need to secure a private redevelopment contract with the HRA and would need to
comply with the criteria for a housing district.
The size of the lots were also discussed, indicating that they are quite smalL but 0 'Neill
stated they would be re-platted with zero lot lines. Another concern was the proposal of
single car garages, but Mr. Kauffmann stated he was not aware that per the City code there
needed to be 2 car garages or something to offset the lack of. O'Neill did state however, that
the code states 2 car garages for single and two family homes, but not for this type of
project.
Lahr advised that the HRA would need to review this concept further as to what would fit
on this property and the kind of financing the l-IRA could do. It was also stated to Mr.
Kauffmann that he should go out and secure the properties and then bring the numbers back
to the HRA for staff to work. Bob Miller, Mr. Kautfmann's attorney, stated his concern
regarding the garages and also that one of the properties has a renter and there could be
relocation costs involved. O'Neill stated he would get Mr. Kauffmann an answer that
evening regarding the garages. It was suggested that it would be better to reduce the density
and add 2-car garages, after Mr. O'Neill returned from checking into the criteria on garages.
6.
Continued - Consideration to hear prOl!ress relative to research ofpurpose/obiective and
funding for a scattered housinl! prol!ram and a motion of action/direction if so necessarv.
Dan Frie stated that there had not been any further progress on this item. He noted a
meeting was held prior to the August HRA meeting. It was noted that this would be a good
project for the 6th Street and Minnesota Street area. Frie states that the process is slow and
the liRA is probably looking at approximately 2 houses per year. They need to identify the
houses that are eligible for this type of program, stating they are targeting the homes with a
value of $65,000 or less.
Frie stated that the process would be to draft a letter and send to potential owners. If they
would get interest from an owner, it \vould be at that time that the HRA would apply for a
grant to fund the purchase of the home. It was decided that Koropchak and O'Neill \vould
get together and work on the targeting of homes prior to Frie and O'Neill speaking with any
-2-
.
.
.
HRA Minutes - 09/06/00
owners of the properties.
7.
Consideration to review rccommended cham~es to the BRA Business Subsidv Criteria and
call for a public hearing.
Koropchak provided the stafIreport stating that previously the HRA commissioners directed
the HRA Attorney to draft changes to the HRA Business Subsidy Criteria increasing the
wage level to at least $9.00 per hour, exclusive of benefits and other changes, for compliance
of the most recent adopted legislative changes.
A copy of the criteria with the proposed changes was submitted. Attorney Bubul's
suggestion is to insert ..... wage of the higher of 59. 00 per hOllr, or at least 160% of the
federal minimum wage ....... The language of the higher allows for future changes should
thc federal minimum wage. Koropchak stated that 160% of the federal minimum wage is
part of the TIF Green Acres Law.
The members were not clear on the language proposed by Bubul and would like to see the
language be more defined. The members requested that Koropchak ask Attorney Bubul for
the criteria. The action needed by the HRA, if satisfied by the recommendation, was to call
for a public hearing to amend the criteria.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STEVE ANDREWS AND SECONDED BY DAN FRIE TO
CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE OCTOBER 4,2000 HRA MEETING. FOR
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE BUSINESS SUBSIDY CRITERIA
FOR 'l'HE I-lOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY
OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA. SUBJECT TO CLARIFICATION BY ATTORt"JEY
BUBUL. Motion carried unanimously.
8.
Consideration to review 1999 Authoritv Summarv Report and consideration to prioritize
HRA goals and expenditures.
Koropchak provided the staff report and informed the members that the attempt of this item
is two fold: One, to identify dollars available to the HRA for development or redevelopment
and the other to define and prioritize HRA goals and expenditures. HRA objectives:
Industrial land acquisition, do\vntown redevelopment and scattered housing. The members
inquired if the HRA could use this money for the scattering housing program and Koropchak
advised that would look into this. Koropchak also statcd that excess tax increment needs to
be earmarked soon.
Koropchak then went through and eXplained these reports. Authority Report Summary
identities difference bet\veen Authority reports to State Auditor and finance reports.
projections. and balances by districts.
Summary of tax increment available for development and redevelopment projects. This
identi ties revenue from districts decertified. excess revenue from older redevelopment
-3-
\-IRA Minutes - 09/06/00
.
districts which have no pooling restriction, and suggests districts for decertification in 2001.
Although the Authority report and Finance report have some discrepancies, these differences
will not impact the excess revenues suggested for expenditures. The suggestions were
reviewed with the HRA Attorney.
It is important for the HRA to earmark the tax increment from District No. 1-5 as the bonds
are paid and to assure the HRA of the use of the dollars and to avoid return of dollars to the
County or to decertify. Perhaps its time for the HRA to prioritize its goals and expenditures
within the downtown district given the need to expend funds by June 2002. The HRA has
treated each project within the downtown district on its own merit. Eligible expenditures are
acquisition, demolition, relocation costs, site improvements, public improvements and
public utilities.
To date and within the dovvntown district, the HRA authorized expenditures for demolition,
relocation, and site improvement costs associated with south anchor, 750A) of sidewalk cost
along Walnut Street between 4th Street and community center. and pathway development
along railroad track from Locust or Linn Street to Walnut Street associated with Sunny
Fresh expansion, acquisition of homes within north anchor. and $1 1,250 annually toward
community center.
.
Koropchak advised that the decisions of the HRA were to define their goals and earmark
excess TIF revenues. They discussed the priorities as being the Amoco site and the North
Anchor. AmoCO is in the works so the next step would be to possibly acquire the three or
four parcels they had targeted on the map. being in the north half of Block 54. and Blocks
64.63 and 62, and in that order. It was also noted that the HRA could do a pay as you go
with a developer to meet the June 2002 deadline.
9.
Consideration to hear an u date on hinh-s
residents and its im ortance as a marketin
Steve gave a brief summary regarding this item noting it is not available at an affordable
price at this time. He explained a DSL circuit and the benefits of the high speed internet.
The advantage is that they \'.ould not have to install any new wire but it is a high investment
for the phone company. Steve has been in contact with TDS as well. The HRA felt this
could be a good marketing tool and Koropchak suggested that Steve keep in contact with the
phone company as to this possibility. Another suggestion was to invite someone from the
TDS, Bresnan Cable and an installation company to an IDC meeting to discuss this idea.
Koropchak was directed to check-out the new technology Grant through DTED.
10.
Consideration to authorize pavment of the monthlv HRA bills.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY DAN FRIE AND SECONDED BY STEVE ANDREWS TO
AUTHORIZE PAYMENT OF THE AUGUST BRA BILLS. Motion carried unanimously.
.
-4-
.
.
.
HRA Minutes - 09/06/00
A MOTION WAS MADE BY DAN FRIE AND SECONDED BY BOB MURRAY TO
AUTIIORIZE PA YMENT OF THE SEPTEMBER HRA BILLS. Motion carried unanimously.
11.
Executive Director's Rcport.
Executive Director Koropchak updated the members on a meeting held with Hans Hagen Homes
to introduce Hans to Monticello's revitalization plan and particular the redevelopment area of the
north anchor (Block 54); the Amoco+ site advising that the preliminary Agreement was executed
and the $5,000 deposit received from Barry Fluth;
Farrell Gas site in that Silver Creek Development withdrew from the project and the city is
contacting other developers and continues conversation with Silver Creek; the EDA approved
two facade improvements for the Preferred Title building and Sweetest 'fhings (previous
Companion Pets building) on West Broadway; IDC Banquet is Tuesday, September 26, Vintage
Grill; Rotary presentation regarding wage, job creation, HRA return of investment. and other
Monticello demographics to the Rotary Club on August 14; Koropchak's meeting with previous
MCP Director and other neighbor representative on September 5; the 200 I City Budget - Budget
time is in process and the Council and staff has met once; Profile - Copy of letter and
reimbursement check; Industrial inquiries slow this month; 25-30 brochures mailed; HRA House
on Walnut St regarding a leak that is dripping on the new carpeting that the renter installed. The
members suggested that the renter fix it and deduct it from the rent. Koropchak suggested Gary
Anderson check on this as well. HRA was comfortable in otfering up to $100 off the rent to
repair: H Windovv put a sign up that their building was for sale, but relayed to Koropehak that
they are not moving but are looking for an investor to buy them out and then re-lease to them in
order for them to free up their cash to develop new product lines.
There was further discussion among staff and HRA members regarding Kauffmann's proposal
and that the developer should design with lesser units and double garages in order for the HRA to
be interested in this project. Rick WoIfsteIler also stated the Mr. Kauffmann had told him that he
would not be willing to pay the $5,000 application fee.
12. Consideration of committee reports:
There were no updates.
13. Other Business. None
4. Adjournment.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOB MURRAY AND SECONDED BY BRAD BARGER TO
ADJOURN 'fHE MEETING AT 9:45 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
lIRA Chair
Recording Secretary
-5-
.
.
.
BRA Agcnda - 10/4/00
6.
Puhlic Hcarin _ Consideration to ado t a rcsolution amcndin the HRA Business
Suhsidy Criteria.
A. Reference and Backl!round:
At the HRA meeting in September, the commissioners called for a public hearing date of
October 4, 2000, for consideration to amend the HRA Business Subsidy Criteria based on
the recommendations ofthe HRA Attorney. The public hearing notice appeared in the
local newspaper per the notice requirement.
Please open the public hearing for public comment and close the hearing prior to HRA
discussion.
Attached is a copy of the criteria with the proposed amendments as drafted by Attorney
Bubul and a copy of the public hearing notice. The proposed amendments address an
increase of the wage level and other criteria to meet the requirements set by the
Minnesota I "egislators.
B. Alternative Action:
1.
A motion to adopt a resolution amending the HRA.. Business Subsidy Criteria.
2.
A motion to deny adoption of the resolution amending the HRA Business Subsidy
Criteria.
3. ^ motion to table any action.
C. Recommendation:
The proposed amendments for redevelopment costs are more or less policy criteria and
allow for maximum flexibility. Recommendation is Alternative No.1.
D. Supporting Data:
Proposed amendments and resolution for adoption.
.
.
.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE BUSINESS SUBSIDY CRITERIA
OF THE .'
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUmORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELW, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City ofMontice1lo,
Minnesota, held a public hearing on September 8, 1999 and approved the Business Subsidy
Criteria for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello,
Minnesota, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.993 through 116J.994; and
WHEREAS, the 2000 Minnesota Legislators acted amendments to the Business Subsidies,
Minnesota Statutes, Section 116.1993 through 116.J995; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City ofMonticeno,
Minnesota, bas performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to approval and
adoption the proposed amendments to the business subsidies, including the holding of a public
hearing upon published notice as required by Law. Public Hearing Date October 4, 2000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in
and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the business subsidy criteria, contained in Exhibit
A of this resolution are hereby approved and adopted and shall be placed on file at the Office of
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, Minnesota.
,.'
Dated:
ATTEST:
It's Chair
It's Executive Director
.
II
9 for
Josi.
.re
~im.
l.
)1
S
;ion
~ indi.
j
Area Public
Notices
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
X HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
. IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE I~ HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in
and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, will hold a public heariny on Wednesday
Oct. 4, 2000, a~ approximately 7 p.m., at City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello:
Minnesota, relatlng to amending the Business Subsidy Criteria pursuant to Minnesota
S~tutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.994. The proposed amendments to the cri-
tena t~ be adopted are available for inspection at City Hall.
A!llnterested persons may appear at the hearing and present their views orally or
~wd~ .
BY ORDER OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
-Ollie Koropchak, Executive Director
(Sept. 28, 2000)
MINNESOTA SECRETARY OF STATE
CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMED NAME
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 333
The filing of an assumed name does
not provide a user with exclusive rights to
that name. The filing is required for con-
sumer protection in order to enable con-
sumers to be able to identify the true
owner of a business.
1. State the exact assumed' name
under which the business is or will be
con~uc~ed (one business name per
applicatIOn): Johnson's Vending Service
2. State the address of the prinCipal
place of business. (A complete street
address or rural route and rural route box
number is required; the address cannot
be a P.O. Box.) 1857 85th St. NE
Monticello, Minn. 55362-3108 '
3. List the name and complete street
address of all persons conducting busi-
ness under the above Assumed Name.
Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary. If
the business owner is a corporation or
other business entity, list the legal name
and registered office address. Betty J.
Johnson, 1857 85th St. NE, Monticello,
Minn. 55326 and Myron C. Johnson,
1857 85th St. NE, Monticello, Minn.
55326.
4. I certify that I am authorized to sign
this certificate and I further certify that I
understand that by signing this certifi-
cate, I am subject to the penalties of per-
jury as set forth in Minnesota Statues
section 609.48 as if I had signed this cer-
tificate under oath. .
Date: August 22, 2000
-Betty J. Johnson, Owner
(Sept. 21, 28, 2000)
CITY OF MONTlCELLO
ORDINANCe NO. 353
AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 8 TO TITLE II ESTAB
MONTICEllO COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY
The City Council of the City of Monticello does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. The City Code is hereby amended to add the followir
CHAPTER 8
MONTICEllO COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY
SECTION:
2-8-1 :
2-8-2:
2-8-3:
2-8-4:
2-8-5:
2-8-6:
2-8-7:
2-8-8:
2-8-9:
2-8-10:
Name of the Commission
Authorization
Membership
Term of Office
Vacancy
Officers
Meetings
Quorum
Duties of the Commission
Amendments
2-8-1: NAME OF THE COMMISSION
.The name of the organization shall be the Community Cen'
2-8-2: AUTHORIZATION:
The authorization for the establishment of this adviSOry boo
MN Statutes, Section 412.111. Duties are delegated to the
AdviSOry Board by the City Council of Monticello by this or
11, 2000, and power pursuantto MN Statutes, Section 412
2-8-3: MEMBERSHIP:
The Community Center Advisory Board shall consist of five
to be appointed by the City Council of Monticello. One mem
ed from the Monticello Senior Center. Either the Mayor or ,
ber shall act as a voting member on the board. All membe,
of the City of Monticello and shall have equal rights and
school student shall be appointed on an annual baSIS to
member of the board.
2-8-4: TERM OF OFFICE:
The term of the regular members shall be for three (3) yea
gered so that no more than two members' terms expire
member may be subject to replacement by the City Counc:
the advisory board will be extended to ensure subsequen
calendar basis, one (1) member's term will expire in 15 m
ber's terms will expire in 27 months and two (2) member':
39 months.
2-8-5: VACANCY:
Any vacancy in the regular or at large membership shall
Council, and such appointee shall serve for the unexpired
2-8-6: OFFICERS:
(A) Elections: The Community Center Advisory Board sh,
meeting from its membership a chair, vice chair and secr
for a term of one year and shall have such powers as ma'
rules of said commission.
(B) Duties of the Chair: The chair shall preside at all meet!
Center Advisory Board and shall have the dUties normally
mentary usage of such officers.
(C) Duties of Vice Chair: The vice chair shall act for the c
(D) Duties of Secretary: A secretary may be appointed w
the Community Center Advisory Board but can be empl
City staff. The secretary shall keep the minutes and reco.
and with the assistance of staff as is available shall prej:
regular and special meetings for commission member:
legal notice of hearings when necessary, attend to corre'
mission, and other duties as are normally carried out by
2-8-7: MEETINGS:
(A) Regular meeting shall be held monthly on a date es
munity Center Advisory Board. In the event of a conflict \'
events, a majority at any meeting may change the date a,
Ing. The meeting shall be open JO the general publiC.
2-8-8: QUORUM:
A majority of the total Community Center Advisory Boar'
tute a quorum for the transaction of business.
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO, 354
CITY OF MONTlCELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY MINNESOTA
THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF MONTICEllO, MINNESOTA HEREBY
ORDAINS AS FOllOWS:
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended by rezoning
the property shown on the map below (the proposed 90th Street plat) from AO
(Agricultural) to B-3 (Business).
B~J
.
V'l
....
i
..J
>-
---------== . ~ -.,
..
This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
Adopted this 11 th day of Sept. 2000.
-Roger Belsaas, Mayor
ATTEST:
Rick Wolfstellerc City Administrator
2-8-9: DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION:
Establishment of an adviSOry board to work with the Co.
to make recommendations and lor changes in Com.
review complaints unresolvable through normal channel
and to make recommendations on non-budqet pUrchae
._...-+ ;."",~ Th.a.,' W'l"'IIlllti ::al"',am in An a.dvisorvicao@1
.
.
.
HRA Agenda - 10/4/00
7.
Consideration to discuss renewal of the Lease A reement between the BRA and SP
Services, Inc. (Skipper's Pool)
A. Reference and Back2found:
The HRA entered into a Lease Agreement with Scott Rolfe, SPS Services, lnc_, for lease
ofthe back portion or the HRA lot along West Broadway for placement and display of
swimming pools, some of which may be filled with water efl'ective upon the BRA named
as an additional insured. The duration ofthe lease began April 5,2000 ending September
1,2000. By no later than August 31, 2000, the lessee shall cause the drainage and
removal of all pools and spas from the Premises...... Lessee also shall be charged and
hereby agrees to pay $25 for each day additional 24-hour period, or any part of 24 hours,
that Lessee occupies the premises after the expiration or proper termination of this
agreement... _... Lease was subject to approval of the conditional use permit allowing for
outdoor display and sales_
I telephoned Scott the week of September 18 to see if indeed he had removed the pools
and spas from the premises. He had not and requested to extend the lease. It is my
understanding, Scott prefers to leave the display up over the winter. He was invited to
the HRA meeting for your consideration to extend and to discuss collection of the
additional fee of $25 per day- The Certificate of Liability Insurance is effective from
5/1/2000 to 51112001.
In viewing the Planning and City Council minutes the conditional use permit was approved
as seasonai from April through August 31, 2000. Therefore, the BRA/Skipper's need to
apply for a new conditional use permit
B. Alternative Action:
Part One
1. A motion to extend the Lease Agreement from September 1, 2000, to May 1,
200 I or by no later than Aprii 30, 200 I subject to approval of a conditional use
permit
2. A motion to deny extension of the Lease Agreement.
3. A motion to table any action.
1
.
BRA Agenda - 10/4/00
Part Two
I . A motion to collect $25 per day beginning September 1 through .--.-'
2. A motion to waive the $25 per day additional fee.
3. A motion to table any action.
C. Recommendation:
Recommendation is alternative no. 1, Part One in order to encourage business retention.
The recommended May 1,2001 date for termination of the lease agreement coincides with
the certill.cate of insurance date~ however, this date may not meet the need of the lessee.
Also, note the existing lease agreement clearly states the need to remove the pools and
spas, this would need modification.
Recommendation is alternative no. 1, Part Two. This provision was inserted to encourage
the lessee to comply with the agreement as in the previous year the HRA noticed the
lessee three times before debris, etc. was removed from the lot.
.
D. Supportin~ Data:
Copy of existing Lease and Planning/Council minutes.
.
2
,
<..
.
LEASE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made this ~ day of Junp. 2000, by and between TIIE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR CITY OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA ("the Lessor"), a public body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota, and
SPS SERVICES, INC. (the "Lessee"), a Minnesota corporation.
I. SUMMARY OF AGREEMENT
A. The following provisions are an integral part of this Agreement. They are referred to
in other sections of this Agreement and are provided for the convenience of the parties. Each
reference to a provision in this Agreement shall be construed to incorporate all terms provided in
this section. Where appropriate, terms used in this Agreement include the plural, and any reference
to Lessee also refers to Lessee's agents, customers, guests, and invitees.
1. LESSEE: SPS Services, Inc.
2. LESSOR: Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Monticello, Minnesota
3.
COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF LEASED PREMISES ("Premises"):
Property located in Wright County, Minnesota, and described as:
The easterly 40 feet of the northerly 48 feet of the parcel described
as: Lots 7 and 8, Block 52 except the southeasterly 16.5 feet of the
southwesterly 90 feet of Lot 8.
.
4. DURATION OF LEASE: September 1, 2000
5. STARTING DATE OF LEASE: April 5,2000
6. NOTICE PERIOD: 60 days
7.
LEASE COST: $
this Agreement.]
[equal to costs associated with preparation of
8. DESIGNATED USE OF PREMISES: For the placement and display of
swimming pools, some of which may be 11lled with water, in connection
with Lessee's business known as Skippers Pool and Spas located at 101 W.
Broadway adjacent to the Premises..
.
.
ll. USE OF PREMISES
A. Lessee agrees to pay Lessor $ , which is the Lessor's out of pocket cost
associated with the preparation and approval of this Agreement, for the use and enjoyment of the
Premises during the te11l1 of this Agreement.
B. Lessee may use the Premises only for the purpose designated above. Lessee further
agrees to apply, by no later than one hour after close of business, proper coverings on all pools that
are filled with water, sufficient to prevent anyone or anything from entering the pool. Such
coverings may be removed from the pools no earlier than one hour before start of business.
C. Lessee may locate and display the pools on the leased PremiseS during the term of
this Agreement or until either party elects to terminate this Agreement as set forth herein.
D. Lessee promises at all times (I) to comply with all laws, rules, and regulations
pertaining to the use of the Premises including without limitation all terms and conditions of the
conditional use permit for the adjacent property at 101 W. Broadway, approved by the City Council
on March 13, 2000; (2) not to use the Premises in an illegal or dangerous manner or that would
cause a cancellation, restriction, or increase in premium for any insurance carried by Lessor on the
Premises; and (3) not to interfere in the maintenance, management, or operation of the Premises.
E. Lessee further promises at all times (I) to direct away from the public right-of-way
any and all lighting either placed on or focused towards the Premises; (2) to clearly stripe and mark
all parking stalls on the Premises; (3) to place a continuOus barrier surrounding each swimming pool
and spa that is located on the Premises sufficient to prevent anyone or anything from entering sucb
pools or spas; and (4) not to construct or erect any temporary or permanent sign, billboard, or other
advertising structure on the Premises.
F. During the term of this Agreement, either Lessor or Lessee shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement in their respective sole discretion by serving on the other party at least 60
days written notice. Lessor is not required to refund to Lessee all or any portion of the Lease Costs
in the event either party terminates this Agreement- Lessor also has the right to terminate this
Agreement immediately if in its discretion the use of the Preurises constitutes a hazard to the public
health, safety, and general welfare of the community.
G. Either upon expiration or termination of this Agreement, but by no later than Augnst
31, 2000, Lessee shall cause the drainage and retuOval of all pools and spas from the Premises.
Such drainage and removal may not damage the PremiseS in any way. All liquid contents of such
pools and spas shall be disposed of in accordance with applicable federal or state laws, regulations,
or guidelines and, if none, then in accordance with applicable manufacturer's suggested gnidelines.
H. If Lessee fails to remove the pools and spas and otherwise fully vacate the Premises
upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, in either event by no later than August 31, 2000,
Lessee shall be liable to Lessor for any damages or costs resulting therefrom, including reasonable
attorney fees and court costs. Lessee also shall be charged and hereby agrees to pay $25 for each
.
.
2
PJC_177768v2
MN190-85
. additional 24-hour period, or any part of 24 hours, that Lessee occupies the Premises after the
expiration or proper termination of this Agreement.
ID. CONDITION OF PREMISES
A. Lessee promises (1) not to damage or misuse the Premises; (2) not to make any
surface or subsurface changes to the Premises without the prior written consent of Lessor; (3) to
immediately notify Lessor of any conditions on or about the Premises that are dangerous to human
health or safety, or that may damage or pose the threat of damage to the Premises; (4) to leave the
Premises, upon expiration or proper termination of this Agreement, in substantially the same
condition as when it entered the Premises; and (5) to keep the Premises in a neat and orderly
condition, with special reference to fire hazards, and to permit no rubbish of any kind to accumulate
on or about the Premises.
B. If the Lessor approves and consents to Lessee attaching improvements to the
Premises, not including the pools or related accessories, all such improvements are the property of
Lessor regardless of who installed and who paid for the improvements. All nonpermanent
improvements installed and paid for by Lessee shall be the property of the Lessee provided Lessee
leaves the Premises in the same or substantially the same condition it was in prior to such
installati on.
.
c. Lessee shall not permit any liens to encumber the Premises for any purpose
including but not limited to labor or material furnished to, or for the account of, Lessee, or claimed
to have been so furnished in connection with any work performed or claimed to have been
performed on or about the Premises.
IV. RIGHTSOFLESSOR
A. If Lessee violates any material term of this Agreement, Lessee may be evicted
immediately, provided that Lessor gives Lessee written notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure
such breach. If Lessee is evicted but does not vacate the Premises voluntarily, then Lessor may file
an eviction action against Lessee and Lessee agrees to pay for all costs associated with such action,
including reasonable attorney fees and court costs. Lessor's election not to sue or evict Lessee does
not prevent Lessor from suing or evicting Lessee for any other violation of any term of this
Agreement.
B. Authorized agents and representatives of Lessor may enter the Premises at any
reasonable time, or at any time in the event of an emergency, to inspect, improve, maintain, or repair
the Premises, provided that their entry shall avoid unreasonably interfering or endangering the
occupants of the Premises. There shall be no allowance to Lessee, or liability on the part of Lessor,
by reason of inconvenience, annoyance, or injury to business, resulting from Lessor's performance
of this provision or any other provision of this Agreement.
C. Lessee shall lawfully, peaceably, and quietly have, hold, occupy, and enjoy the
Premises during the term of this Agreement, without hindrance or objection by any persons lawfully
.
PJC-177768v2
MN190-85
3
. claiming under Lessor; provided, however, Lessee ohserves, keeps, and performs all terms and
provisions of this Agreement.
v. LIABILITY OF LESSEE AND LESSOR
A. Lessor, and its agents, employees, and representatives are not responsihle for any
damage or injury caused hy and to Lessee, or to its property, agents, customers, guests, or invitees.
LessOr, and its agents. employees, and representatives also are not responsible for the actions of, or
any damages, injury, or harm caused by, third parties who are not under LeSSor's control.
B. Notice. A notice, demand, or other communication by either party to the other party
under this Agreement shall be sufficiently given or delivered if dispatched by registered or certified
mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally as follows:
1. for Lessor, mail notice to:
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Monticello, Minnesota
Attn: Executive Director
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362-8831
2.
for Lessee, mail notice to:
C. Eminent Domain. In the event that all or part of the Premises are acquired or taken
uuder the power of eminent domain for public use, Lessor may, at its sole option, terminate this
Agreement as of the date on which the acquiring authority becOmes entitled to possession of the
Premises. In the event of such termination, Lessee shall have no further right to any possession of
the Premises, uor to any compensation or award of damages for any past or future leasehold interest
or at such other address that either party from time to time may designate in writing
and may forward to the other party as provided in this section.
SPS Services, Inc.
Attn: Scott and Amy Rolfe
101 West Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
.
D. Lessee shall not cause or permit to be caused any act or practice, by negligence,
omission, or otherwise, that would affect the environment in any way, and shall not do anything or
permit anything to be done that would be in violation of any federal or state law, regulation, or
guideline. This includes but is not limited to the improper or illegal nse or disposal of any
flammable, combustible, hazardous, or explosive fluid, material, pollutant, chemical, or substance.
A violation of this clause will be considered a material breach of this Agreement.
.
4
PJC-177768v2
MN190-85
,
VI. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICA nON
A. Insurance. Lessee shall procure and carry the following insurance at all times that
Lessee occupies the Premises:
1. Lessee, at its sole cost and expense, shall maintain in full force and effect
during the term of the Lease and any renewal thereof:
a. General Liability insurance in the following minimum amounts:
1. $1,000,000 bodily injury, including death, per person;
$1,000,000 bodily injury, including death, per occurrence;
$500,000 property damage, per occurrence; or
11. $1,000,000 per occurrence, combined single limits;
$1,000,000 aggregate.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, shall be named as an Additional Insured.
The general liability policy shall contain a stipulation that Lessee's
insurer will provide to Lessor written notice at least 30 days prior to
cancellation of such insurance. All language limiting this
requirement on the Certificate shall be stricken. The insurance shall
be carried by solvent and responsible insurance companies licensed
to do business in the state of Minnesota.
b. Property Insurance on Lessee's personal property m an amount
necessary to replace such property if necessary.
c. Workers' Compensation as required by law.
2. Evidence of all required insurance shall be in the form of a Certificate of
Insurance (ACCORD Type) and shall be sent to the Lessor immediately
upon acceptance of this Agreement.
B. Indemnification. Lessee shall indemnify and protect, defend, and hold Lessor and
the City of Monticello and their agents, employees, and representatives harmless against all
expenses, liabilities, and claims of any kind, including but not limited to reasonable attorney fees, by
and behalf of any person or entity arising out of either (1) a failure by Lessee to perform any of the
terms or conditions of this Agreement; (2) any injury or damage happening on or about the
Premises; or (3) failure to comply with any federal, state, or local law. This provision shall survive
the expiration or termination of this Agreement as to claims for incidents that occurred either during
the term of the Agreement or occupancy by Lessee, whichever is longer.
PJC-177768v2
MN190-85
5
,
,
C. Reimbursement. Lessee shall reimburse Lessor, and its agents, employees, officers,
and representatives for (1) any loss, property damage, or costs of repair or service caused by the
negligence on or improper use of the Premises by Lessee; (2) all costs incurred by Lessor arising
from Lessee's abandonment of the Premises or other violations of this Agreement by Lessee; and
(3) all costs incurred by Lessor resulting from any action or suit for eviction, unpaid rent, or any
other debt or charge, induding but not limited to reasonable attorney fees and court costs.
VII. GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Force Majeure. If the performance of any part of this Agreement by either party
is prevented, hindered, delayed, or otherwise made impracticable by reason of any flood, riot,
fire, judicial or government action, act of God, or any other causes beyond the control of either
party, that party shall be excused from such to the extent that it is prevented, hindered, or delayed
by such causes.
B. Waiver. The performance or observance of any promise or condition set forth in
this Agreement may be waived only in writing. No delay in the exercise of any power, right, or
remedy operates as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any other power,
right, or remedy. Lessor may use its legal rights and remedies in any combination and, by using
one or more of these rights or.remedies, Lessor does not waive any other rights or remedies it may
have available. .
C. Severability. If any provision or application of this Agreement is held invalid,
unlawful, or otherwise unenforceable in any respect, it is to that extent to be deemed omitted.
The remainder of the Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the maximum extent possible.
D. Assignment. Lessee may not, but Lessor may, assign or sublease its rights, duties,
or obligations under this Agreement to any person or entity, in whole or in part. The covenants
and agreements in this Agreement shall bind and benefit the heirs, executors, administrators,
successors, and assigns of the parties to this Agreement.
E. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive
statement of all mutual understandings between the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof, and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous proposals, communications, and
understandings, whether oral or written. Any amendment or modification of this Agreement
must be in writing and signed by both parties.
F. Goyerning Law; Consent to Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota, without regard to its
conflict of laws provisions.
G. Read and Understand. Each party acknowledges that it has read and understands
this Agreement and agrees to be bound by its terms.
PJC.I77768v2
MN190.85
6
,
Date: '1- 5-CO
SPS, INe.
By4duU
President
DATE: lo-~{o -[0
\
PJC-177768v2
MN190-85
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTIfORITY IN AND FOR TIlE CITY OF
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
Ber-7 LL-
Its hair
BY~ ~C.hO \(y~
Its Executive Director
7
., ..,.........'...'.'...'...'.....'.................
ACORD",
.,. .',:.:.;.'.'.'.".. .....:~".:::::;;;:
620
MN 55720
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
Ext:
..................."_......................,,................".....
COMPANY We s t f; e 1 d Com pan i e s
A
INSUREi)'
. . - . - . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . , , . .
Skippers Pools & Spas
SPS Services Inc.
101 West Broadway
P.O. Box 1234
Monticello, MN 55362
COMPANY
B
COMPANY
C
COMPANY
o
tHIS IS Tot~:R+I~:~~~l;(tA~::~~~~i~:I~~~:;b~::~:~:~:~:~~;~T;~~~~:~:;;~;~t~~::~!~J~:~~:~~;~:~:;:~~~~b:;:+~::~~;~~~;J:~G:~~~;~~1~~8~:~~g0EF6R 'THE' Pb32V~~g~I~~;<;:;::;:;:::............,.
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES, LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO
LTR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE (MMlDDIYY) DATE (MMlDDIYY)
LIMITS
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
X ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS
NON.OWNED AUTOS
P3802932
GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000
PRODUCTS. COMP/OP AGG $ 2 00 000
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000
05/01/2000 05/0l,!2001
EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1 000
FIRE DAMAGE (Anyone fire) $ 50,000
MED EXP (Anyone person) 5,0 0
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $
1,000,000
BODILY INJURY $
(Per person)
05/01/2000 05/01/2001
BODILY INJURY $
(Per accident)
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
AUTO QNL Y . EA ACCIDENT
OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY:
EACH ACCIDENT
AGGREGATE $
EACH OCCURRENCE
AGGREGATE $
$
5 100,000
05/01/2000 05/01/2001
5 0,000
EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE 100,000
GENERAL LIABILITY
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ;
CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR;
A CWP3802932
OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT ;
A
GARAGE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
EXCESS LIABILITY
UMBRELLA FORM
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
A
THE PROPRIETOR!
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS ARE:
OTHER
INCL
EXCL
CP5413179
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSlLOCATIONSNEHIClESlSPECIAL ITEMS
utdoor di splay
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Executive Director
505 Walnut Street
Monticello, MN 55362-8831
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAil
-3..ll.- DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,
BUT FAILURE TO MAlL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR liABiliTY
,ffl99J~R~~~:.m~~~.:'r):t::;;;;
:.:.:.;.'.
" ,
:::: ~. :::.::::: ::::::::::;: .'.'
.....::;W."9R'lt?:9g,~~]!9~:f~~"W
"..".
....:.";:;';...:....... ....'............
....;;:."-,..:.:.; :::::::::::.:::::.:.:.:::.:.:.:.:..;,:.:. '.....................:..'.'...':.:,.....
j~~~~~};;l~mm~r~~
\
SPS SERVICES, INC.
101 W. BROADWAY PH. 612-295.5779
P.O. BOX 1234
MONTICEllO, MN 55362
75-235/919 4 12 3
7800182
DATE 1.2_-=...L~ -00 .~
I'AYTOTHf: I/\A ._ I, A ^ - N 0 j\
k ORDol! OF r V \(', \.^-J-I ~ _ F-. rl_.
.. : A -t. t'7/
ii'~~~~\Q .\lL.'--. Q-.J . flDp
.
o
Q'/j
._J $ In /{j '~-
...__ DOLLARS m 8:$~:::'
FIRST
MINNESOTA
BANK N...
P.Q. 84,1( 760 . MOllli,cUIl, MN S.B61 . ~11-1l00
.. ~-iitHkn
~ * 2 3 O---~
M'
MEMO__._~....._...__...__
1:09 *90 23531: 78 00 *B 2111
........
'"' \(...1 ~ (I \ f'q '-I, \t... .)Cj(.)\.) --Cj '-,.
Council Minutes - 3/13/00
There was some discussion on fees based on the complexity of the project and it was felt there needed to
be some clarification on the engineering fees and how they were determined.
Bruce Thielen noted that the grant application process is very competitive and it would be unlikely, if
the City would drop out that they would be funded again at some future date. The consensus of the
Council was that the project was important. However, they were looking to see if the City funded the
City's share of the project from reserves what impact it would have. Bruce Thielen also suggested that
the Mayor and/or Councilmembers go to the school district and discuss funding participation by the
district.
Clint Herbst questioned whether it was feasible to have a second engineering firm look at this project.
John Simola, Public Works Director, responded that the time frame on this project being limited would
not work well for involving a second engineering firm. Clint Herbst asked what the estimated
engineering costs would be for the plans and specifications. Bret Weiss replied the cost would be
approximately $62,000.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE ENGINEER TO PREP ARE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BRIDGE AND PATIIWA Y PROJECT AS OUTLINED IN THEIR
SCOPE OF SERVICES UNDER THE FEE ARRANGEMENT AS REQUESTED CONTINGEN"r
UPON THE STAFF DETERMINING OPTIONS FOR FINANCING OF THE CITY'S SHARE OF
THE PROJECT COSTS AND BRINGING THESE FINANCING OP"nONS BACK TO THE
COUNCIL FOR DISCUSSION AT A FUTURE MEETING. ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
G
Consideration of a request for a conditional use oermit to allow open sales as an accessory
use in the B-4, Rel!ional Business District. Applicant: Skipper Pools and Spas.
Jeff O'Neill summarized the Planning Commission's consideration of this item and reviewed the
conditions proposed as part of the conditional use penuit. The Planning Commission also addressed the
complaints about the property owner's storage of materials outside. It was noted that the site is not ideal
for its current use so it is extremely dif1icult to arrive at a permanent solution on the issue of outside
display and storage. There was discussion on whether it was better to allow the display and storage on
the site or on the property owned by the HRA and leased to the tenant.
\
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING
OUTDOOR DISPLA Y AND SALES FOR SKIPPER POOLS AND SPAS LOCATED AT 101 WEST
BROADW A Y (Lots 9 & 10, Block 52, Original Plat) SUBJECT TO TIlE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
I. Entering into a satisf'-l<:tory lease arrangcment Ilith the IIR.\ that in<:ludes '-l hold hannless .md indemnitleation elause proteeting
the City against hmsuirs associ,lted Ilith display of pools IlIkd with \later.
2. All lighting must br: directed allay Ii-om the publit: right-of-way.
3. Parking sttllls must br: clearly striped and marked.
4. No permanent or temporary signs shall be ereeted on the outdoor display.
5. An)' swimming pool or spa displayed outdoors must be provided with a eontinuous surrounding barrier to prevcnt entry.
6. Outdoor swimming pool or spa displays may eontain lIat.:r for structural reasons. but must be securcly covered during night
time or non-business hours.
4
(!)
FILE COpy
Planning Commission Minutes - 03/07/00
Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for a conditional use permit allowing open
sales as an accessory use in the B-4, Regional Business District. Applicant: Scott Rolfe,
Skippers Pools & Spas.
Jeff O'Neill presented the report noting that Scott Rolfe, Skippers Pools and Spas, and
the HRA are requesting a renewal of the conditional use permit allowing outside sales at
101 W. Broadway. Jeff stated that new this year is the request to till the pools which
goes against one of the previous conditions of approval, and also that Scott Rolfe is aware
of the concerns regarding outside storage and has indicated the he will comply with the
terms of the permit in the future. The HRA has also indicated that they will monitor the
use of their property.
\
Acting Chair Richard Carlson opened the Public Hearing. Scott Rolfe, Skippers Pools,
addressed the members stating that the storage concern has been cleared up with the HRA
-1-
BRA Agenda - 10/4/00
8. Continuation - Consideration to hear pro2ress relative to research of
purpose/obiective and funding for a scattered bousine proeram and a motion of
action/direction if so necessary.
Commissioner Frie will update the HRA on the progress he and O'Neill made in
identifying potential homes tor a scattered housing program and the next step.
,
BRA Agenda - 10/4/00
9. Continuation - Consideration to finalize 1999 Authority Cashtlow and prioritize
BRA eoals and expenditures.
A. Reference and Backe:round:
At the September meeting, a recap of available tax increment by district was presented
and the HRA agreed to proceed with the Amoco site redevelopment and begin the process
for acquisition of the north lots of Block 54 and Block 64,63, and most northeasterly lot
of Block 62. Since that time, Wolfsteller and Koropchak met with Mark Ruff, Ehlers &
Associates, to review suggested use of excess tax increment and to confirm 4 year knock-
down and 5 year knock-out rules and recording oflocal contributions from non.restrictive
funds.
\
Mark concurred excess tax increment from decertified economic districts be transferred to
the decertified economic districts with shortfalls. Excess tax increment from the River
Mills District excluding final debt payment be returned to the County. Tax increment
revenues from Construction Five District can be committed as temporary bond debt
payments for the Downtown District with the intent to reimburse the Construction Five
District in the future (This gives flexibility and maximizes the use of non-restrictive tax
increment dollars while preserving the dollars for future industrial use.)
Damn, Dan, Jeff, and Koropchak met with Hans Hagen Homes relative to his interest for
residential redevelopment within the North Anchor area. We held a second meeting and
preliminary concepts were presented. All Council and HRA members were informed of
the concept. At the second meeting, the larger scope of the North Anchor meaning the
retaiVcommercial component was addressed and the firm ofKKE was suggested and
makes good sense to look at the area in total (the bigger picture.) This past Thursday,
Darrin, Dan, Jeff, and Koropchak met with KKE who will test the market and interested
developers for ideas or concepts which best attract a draw to the North Anchor area. Of
the three sites: Amoco, River StreetlBroadway commercial, and Front Street housing and
given the time constrains; the River StreetlBroadway commercial development would
generate the greater amount of tax increment; however, now competes with the
retail/commercial market for the Farrell Gas site. The housing development creates the
density to support retail/commercial development. Office space for professionals such as
attorneys, accountants, real estate agents would generate a draw for employment and
potential housing, restaurant, and other retail/commercial development.
The HRA Chair did request a recap of tax increment available for redevelopment of the
North Anchor and estimated revenues and expenditures. Additionally, he request the
HRA begin to draft a list the economical benefits associated with the redevelopment of the
North Anchor project.
I
BRA Agenda -10/4/00
Darrin and Koropchak have met with O'Connor and Bostic and have a meeting scheduled
with the Carlson's for October 11. The purpose of these meetings is to inform the
property owner of the HRA's interest to acquire their property, the need for the HRA to
update or obtain an appraisal, and that a relocation advisor will be contacting them to
advise them of their relocation rights and benefits. It is for that reason, the lIRA is asked
to consider the following action authorize the hiring of an appraiser and a relocation
advisor. The BRA was advised to obtain or update the appraisals prior to making aw:>ffer
to acquire.
At the lIRA meeting Koropchak will recap numbers, group discussion on concepts for
redevelopment, review appraiser list for selection, and review relocation advisor list for
selection.
B. Alternative Actions:
Appraiser
1. A motion authorizing appraiser to update or obtain an
appraisal for the O'Connor, Bostic, and Carlson properties for submission to the
lIRA by November 1, 2000.
2. A motion of other authorization.
3. A motion to deny authorization to hire an appraiser for the O'Connor, Bostic, and
Carlson properties.
3. A motion to table any action.
Relocation Advisor
\
1. A motion authorizing relocation advisor to advisor
O'Connor, Bostic, and Carlson of their relocation rights and benefits.
2. A motion of other authorization.
3. A motion to deny authorization to hire a relocation advisor.
4. A motion to table any action.
2
BRA Agenda -10/4/00
C. Recommendation:
The recommendation is to authorize hiring an appraiser and relocation advisor. This
recommendation allows the HRA to proceed on a timely fashion for potential acquisition
and demolition prior to June 1, 2001. This follows the BRA direction of September.
D. Supportine Data:
Hans Hagen Homes preliminary concepts. List of appraisers, relocation advisors, and
estimated project revenues and expenditure presented at meeting.
,
3
.':1
,.":n
........."'-.H...
Uu
.'J1
,,:,]
The districts connect along the streets and public spaces of downtown. How
they come together determines the real character of Monticello's downtown.
Design directions have been established to guide the patterns of built elements
to fit the underlying use of each site; to capture the opportunities offered by a
downtown on a river; and to develop ways of making the activities of people
the highlight of the downtown and riverfront.
\
"'-1"
U"~l
..'c.",'.:..,',....
-------
.~
--......
"...-.....~.....r:I.
u
'.~u
"n
A.
'10-
."
.-f'
]
-.11
'~J~
,J
~1
I.J
,",:.~
\
10
<"
i 111
10
(J)
-;
10
111
m
--l
r
1
G\
J>.
~
m
::t:
2
ffi
u.'
LOC05T 5TRE:E:T
H~
M'II"
U1
WALLNUT 5TREE:T
1
~,
i'l
11;:"
: '11
I Iii'
!" '
t:~j
II. i
.1"1 I
~ ",',
.' 'If
.I'
-n
/(}
2
-I
(f> ."
:f Ii
my
me
-1\
"
i: I:'
I '
I,'i/ "
;i
'iF
114
I'
I;'
I~'ll
':I/f
1:.1
j
,
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
in and for the City of Monticello, Minnnesota
September 29,2000
APPRAISERS
John Farrell- appraisal was high
Terry Nagoski ~ Big Lake
Clarence Eull -
Rod Dragstad ~ Monticello
RELOCATION ADVISOR
Stuart "Bud" Storm
Evergreen Land Services
Minnetonka, Mn
952~930-31 00
Rates - Manager, $65 per hour, consultant $55 per hour, does not include mileage or expenditures
(Recommended by Corrine Thomson)
Ken Heisey
Conworth, Inc.
St. Louis Park, MN
952-929-0044
Rates - $70 per hour, includes mileage, copies, secretary services.
(Recommended by Corrine Thomson)
Dan Wilson
Wilson Development Services
Chaska, MN
Rates - Residental $65 per hour. Does not mileage, etc. Commercial $75 per hour. (Look at
settlements) Used by City for Highway 25 South.
~q
218 Front Street - Mike O'Connor 295-3453
Appraisal 3-22-1997 $89,300 John Farrell
Appraisal 7-20-1998 $81,000 Terry Nagoski
HRA offer $84,000 3-year option accepted 11-4-1998
HRA withdrew offer lack-or-funds
EMV Payable 2000 $73,800
225 Front Street - Richard and Marian Carlson 2954462
Appraisal 6-1-1993 $163,000 Clarence Eull
Appraisal 10-27-1997 $165,000 Rod Dragstad
Carlson counter-o iTer of $179,500 8-5-1998
HRA withdrew lack-of-funds
EMV Payable 2000 $141,900
8 Locust Street - Sandy Bostic 295-5931 - w 241-9856
EMV Payable 2000 $57,100
N oranchlist. 2000
,
Monday, September 25,5:30 p.m.
City Hall
Wednesday, October 11,7:00 p.m.
City Hall
Tuesday, October 3,5:00 p.m.
City Hall
,
Estimated TI Revenues and Project Costs
District No. 1-22
Project TI Revenues Land Sale Project Costs
(Acquistion,
Reloc. Demo)
SECTION A
BBF $660,000
City Budget $ 35,000
GriIMarq/1MN 5670,760
Farrell Gas $465.600
Total A $1,831,360 ($915,000 NPV)
SECTION B & C
Block 36 (Amoco) $450,000 ($225,000 NPV) $375,000
Block 54 $275,000 ($137,500 NPV) $100,000 $378,000
Block 64 Carlson $220,000
Block 52 (retail) $772.200 ($386.000 NPV) $140.000 $1.400.000
Total B & C $1,497,200 ($748,500 NPV) $240,000( C) $2,373,000
TOTALS $1,903,250 NPV (A,B,&C) $2,373,000
GAP $470,000
\
Other sources Office adds another $233,000 NPV
Construction V $360,000 NPV
HRA General Fund
Block 36 (Amoco)
PID# EMV2000 EMV1997 Ie 1997 Est. Purchase Price
Amoco 036130 $20,100 $19,100 $879
036140 $60,000 $86,400 $2,592 $175,000
Olson 036010 $52,400 $48,700 $1,120 $ 80,000
Bergquist 036011 $66,100 $60,000 $604 $100,000 (w
relocation)
TOTALS $198,600 $214,200 $5,195 $355,000
Assumptions: 5,700 sq ft office (second floor housing)
,
Office 5,700 sq ft @ $65 per sq ft = $370,500 EMV = $11,097 TC
House (rental) 7 units @ 800 sq ft per unit X $50 per sq ft = $40,000 per unit X 7 =
$280,000 + garage $35,000 (7 stalls) == $315,000 = $7,560 Te
New TC $18,657 - OTC $3,471 = $14,568 X 1.12 == $16,316 annually x 18 = $293,690
($46,845 NPV) Phase I
Assumptions: 8 townhouse units @ $50,000 each = $400,000 + $60,000 garages == $460,000
X 2.40 = NTC $11,040 . $1,724"'" $9,316 X 1.12 = $10,433 X 15 years == $156,508 ($78,200
NPV) Phase II
Acquisition/relocation Costs $355,000
TI Revenues $225,000 NPV
Gap $130,000
Demo/clean site $20,000
Block 54 Northerly One--Half
\
Parcel
Schlief
Reed
Bostic
O'Connor
OTC
$598
$442
$529
$687
Purchase Price
$83,000
$30,000
$77,000
$95.000
TOTAL
Less
REMAINING
$2,256
$285,000
$ 50,000
$235,000
Demo $20,000 Relocation $60,000 Closing $3,000
Total $93,000 + $285,000 = $378,000.
Contingency $10,000
Area: 1.25 acres or 54,450 sq ft. 10 single family-zero lot line, 2 stall garage, 2~story (2,000 sq
ft).
Selling price $150,000 to $200,000. Brick front.
EMV $118,000
$760 + $693 = $1,453 X 10 = 14,530 - $2,256 = $12,274
$12,274 x 1.12 = $13,746 x 20 = $274,937. $137,500 NPy.
Construction $101.75 X 1,000 sq ft = $101,750 X ]0 = $1,017,500 + $150,000 land
= $1,167,500 + 18% return of investment $210,150 = $1,377,650 or $138,000.
HRA Costs - $378,000
Revenues- TI $13 7,000 NPV
Land Sale $150,000 ($15,000 per
lot)
Total $287,000
GAP $91,000
Plus Carlson $220,000 = $311,000
Carlson $185,000 + $35,000 Other = $220,000
Block 52
PID# EMVZOOO EMV1997 TC1997 Est. Purchase
Price
Johnson 155-010-052070 $16,900 $15,600 $718
w052090 $69,600 $64,800 $2,981
BRA -052071 $4,256 $50,000
Vacant City w052010 $600 $0
Froslie =052102 $3,200 $ 3,000 $138
-052111 $223,100 $210,600 $8,088
-052112 $11,800 $ 11,200 $515
Kjellberg =052113 $47,100 $44,300 $1,329
Springborg w052131 $26,800 $23,900 $1,099
City w052132 $8,000 0
-052114 $17,600 0
w052015 $23,500 0
TOTAL $398,500 $19,124 $1,050,000
Proiect Costs
Raw Land $7.25 per sq ft x 76,230 sq ft = $552,667
Buildings = $398,500
Dem/relocation = $400,000
Total Projected Costs = $1,400,000
Projected TI Revenues
$386,000 NPV Retail/Housing
$609,000 NPV Office/Housing
? Land Sale
,
ASSUMPTIONS: 76,230 sq ft land 28,000 sq ft print building(bousing, retail, and
underground parking)
Housing 28,000 sq ft (14 units 2,000 sq ft each @ $55 per sq ft I;:: $110,000 EMV each X 14
units = $1,540,000 EMV annually
Retail 28,000 sq ft @ $35 per sq ft = $980,000 EMV annually
Parking 28,000 sq ft @ $15 per sq ft = $420,000 EMV annually
Tax Capacity Housing $18,494 (14 units) annually
Tax Capacity Retail $31,820 annually
Tax capacity Parking $12,780 annually
TOTAL NEW TAX CAPACITY $63,094
Less Original TC $19,124
New TC $45,970 X 1.12 tax rate = $51,486 tax increment annually
x 15 years = $772,296 ($386,000 NPV)
Office 28,000 sq ft @ $65 per sq ft = $1,820,000 EMV annually
Tax Capacity Housing $18,949 annually
Tax Capacity Office $60,380 annually
Tax Capacity Parking $12,780 annually
TOTAL NEW TAX CAPACITY $91,654
Less Original TC $19,124
New TC $72,530 X 1.12 tax rate = $81,233 tax increment
annually X 15 years = $1,218,504 ($609,251 NPV)
\
BRA Agenda -10/ .4/00
10. Consideration to authorize oavment of the monthly BRA bills.
Recommend a motion authorizing payment of the monthly HRA bill.
,
1
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
September 13, 2000
Statement No. 34406
City of Monticello
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
\
Through August 31, 2000
MN190-00041 Redevelopment - General
Expenses
134.10
4.20
Total Current Billing:
138.30
I declare, under penalty of law, that this
, account, claim or demand is just and carre
and that no p fit h aid.
O~TO PAY? oL
C 11. ~ \\ ~1-LA.c0- ~Cl-
ode:
Initial ~
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
41-1225694
September 13, 2000
Invoice # 34406
City of Monticello
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
MN190-00041
Redevelopment - General
Through August 31,2000
For All Legal Services As Follows:
8/24/2000 SJB Telephone conference with 0 Koropchak regarding Fay
Mar local matter.
8/31/2000
Hours
0.30
SJB Telephone conference with 0 Koropchak regarding 0.60
business subsidies, various TIF matters; review and revise
subsidy criteria.
Total Services:
For All Disbursements As Follows:
Photocopies
Fax
Total Disbursements:
$
Total Services and Disbursements: $
Amount
44.70
89.40
134.10
$
1.20
3.00
4.20
\
138.30
BRA Agenda - 10/4/00
11. Consideration of Executive Director's Report.
a) Kauffinann - Based on the discussion at the HRA meeting, Mr. Kauffinann will be
working with the City Planner Consultant for development of the site relative to density
and suggested double garages. Until an acceptable plan is developed will the HRA
consider the use ofTIF. Mark Ruff does agree the project best fits the requirements for a
Housing District ifthe developer is agreeable and requests the use of TIF.
b) HRA House - My understanding, the tenant feels they do not have the expertise to
repair the leak; however, Gary Anderson volunteered to help them out. When
appropriate, the HRA will need to notifY the tenant of vacating.
c) High-speed access - In the Director's report to the IDC, the HRA's recommendation
for the IDC to host a meeting among the cable company, local telephone, and Intemet
provider(s), was included. Unfortunately, due to a funeral, I was not at the IDC meeting.
Follow-up next time.
d) Amoco site - Brad Johnson and Barry Fluth inform me that they will be ordering
appraisals on the three properties (9/29). It is their intent to obtain appraisals before
contacting owners for negotiations. The HRA approved an 120-day exclusive right
preliminary agreement with Fluth.
e) 300,000 sq ft headquarter/production facility - Projection description attached. The
RFP does not identifY acreage needs and I talked with Pfeffer if he has received any
inquiries for big users. It appears the company assumes if we respond to the RFP the City
has adequate property or they looking for incentive packages for use against the City of
St. Cloud. Monticello will respond. I did request a list of the job types.
f) 100,000 sq ft 3-story headquarter - Monticello remains in the running along with St.
Cloud. When decision is made will move fast. No further contact with City.
g) IDC Banquet - Thanks for attending. About 125 in attendance. It was fun, good food,
and entertaining speaker.
\
h) Chadwick/City Negotiations - Chadwick Group has hired a real estate development
consultant to prepare options for the City and Chadwick to consider. Upon recognizing of
the amount of gravel for mining and the grading level acceptable to the City, the Chadwick
Group has changed the terms of the initial intent of the land swap. The consultant met
with Wolfsteller, O'Neill and Koropchak last week to discuss other options. Attached is
the copy of the June 1999 HRA resolution requesting the City to actively pursue
acquisition of the property.
1
\\ej
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
"""'~';,'::":,~')"'~':'.!~:<')r.>N,'k"I~~II-%)tl~n~.9'Ii~~,,,,,,,,.."..~~,.~. .
p--.,_....~
._~..M.~~-:II1J'!{~:~1t:1J.\,~I:~.~~',r;~:~\:':;!.','~,~ ;,~ '. .',
;1:N$1:;:~~f~~L_. .". __.
__J._~1!tfl\V~)!:0:1}i"""""'"
Julien J. Studley, Inc. has been retained by Wolters Kluwer US Corporation, on behalf of its subsidiary,
Bankers Systems Incorporated ("BSI"), a financial services documentation and software company, to
conduct a regional site search to identify opportunities for the location of its St. Cloud headquarters. The
project represents an estimated $40 to $50 million capital investment in land, building and equipment,
including the construction of an approximate 300,000 square foot headquarters/production facility.
Given Wolters Kluwer/BSI's stability, financial strength, the plans for future expansion, we are engaging
in a strategic comprehensive analysis focused on the following: land opportunities, labor availability,
transportation infrastructure, parking ease and expenses, taxation associated with employment, a
supportive community foundation and economic development incentive opportunities.
BSI currently employs approximately 800 people; BSI's growth plans will create an additional 200 jobs
over the next five years. It is imperative that the location of this project provides them the labor,
infrastructure and cost efficiencies needed to thrive as their business continues to grow into an electronic
environment. The successful community will be the one that most values the benefits of having
approximately 1,000 high-quality jobs and approximately $40 to $50 million in income tax revenue and its
purchasing power located in or nearby its community. A breakdown of job types is available by request.
A strong transportation infrastructure also critically impacts BSI's ability to do business. Proximity and
access to interstate highways, airports and rail lines will allow BSI to operate efficiently and decrease the
time and expense associated with employees commuting, seeing customers and suppliers and shipping
products. Availability of amenities such as retail, food choices, hotels, day care, health care and recreation
will be important, as well.
In addition to the direct capital investment and employee inlpact of the company's operations, there are
several indirect benefits associated with this project. BSI works in conjunction with many local businesses
and is considered an integral part of its current community. BSI also seeks to sponsor local events and
activities and patronize local businesses for its service needs. Given BSI's size, the company provides a
tremendous opportunity for local business-to-business and business-to-consumer enterprises.
....... ~.rtc:.
.. .I111ip.n .1. StmJl P. v.. Inr:.
1IIIiIl....."..".1 .
I
I
I
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
=-
!:II
=-
.'
=-
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
'."':":':.':':":""'-"';i'='~~-~~~'~"- - - -- _'~~"~"~''''':''''''''>'':N''''''''''''''''
i");iixt~f~l~ _ . . -. r~~~!~I;*)::;::Y:'"
Based on the information available to you, please provide a response to the following questions. Please do
not provide your community's standard information packet, but instead respond to the specific
questions included in this proposal. Feel free to include, however, supporting documentation for your
responses. For financial incentive related questions, please detail the type of financial incentives for which
a project of this nature would qualify and quantify your answers when possible, I.e. tax credits :::
$1 ,SOO/per job @ 2,000 jobs::: $3,000 credit.
1. Does this project, as described, meet an SIC code or "industry cluster" that is targeted for
attraction by your state or municipality?
2. Please address your community's ability to provide the needed labor pool for this project. Please
provide a demographic analysis of the labor pool, labor draw area, skilled and unskilled labor,
union activity, and significant employers in your area, including number of people employed.
Please include information regarding ALL taxes associated with employment that our client will
incur and any incentive opportunities to offset this area of taxation.
3. Please detail the transportation infrastructure available in your area, including retail, water, air and
vehicular traffic. Identify interstate and US highways, as well as local routes. Note the location of
ports of entry and include approximate distances. Please address public transportation, as well,
indicating any incentive opportunities geared toward these programs.
4. Please provide an example of a recent project for which the state or municipality awarded
economic development financial incentives. Please state the industry type; total amount of new
jobs; total capital investment; and total financial incentive package, with a breakdown of the award
per incentive type. Would you recommend the beneficiary company be used as a testimonial for
your municipality and state?
... ....__'-;.....~....u-
.. Julien J. Studley, Inc.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:II
.
.
:II
=-
:II
:II
:II
:II
:II
=-
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
":",,,>\,I(,,'!'r':~:J,,..'~:~I'\li'.'~{i!'~~~"'7:"~"".~, ~,,.....,,~~ .."~ ~.u~~.__ _"_ _." .,~,,~, 1Iloo","" ,.i'"VII'~'\'~'~~~~"'::''''''~'~~';{ ":;; ..,::', "."
iHW;i!qf1:jfJ~"_",__ .__............,.~,_1!I1\!*(!\!~:;'!'i!"iiii".
5. Please describe the financial incentive programs for which this project is eligible. For each, please
indicate whether the program is administered at the local or state level; the time line associated from
application submission to incentive acknowledgement; application fees; and the existing tax rate or
mill levy per category and tax formula, Le. sales 4%. Include quantifiable numbers where possible
and program policy documents.
a. Real Property Tax Abatement;
b. Personal Property Tax Abatement;
c. Sales Tax Exemptions or Rebates
d. Inventory Tax Exemptions;
e. Machinery and Equipment Tax Exemptions;
f. Research & Development Tax Credits;
g. Daycare Tax Credits;
h. Job Tax Credits;
1. Capital Investment Tax Credits;
j. Grants (Infrastructure, etc.);
k. Forgivable Loans;
1. Job Training Programs;
m. Permit/Fee Waivers.
\
6. Please describe "clawback" provisions or company commitments or obligations upon receiving
economic development financial incentives.
Please respond to Fred Schuler or John Musgjerd at Julien J. Studley, Inc. by Friday, October 13,2000. If
you have any questions, please call (312) 595-2900.
.............111I::.
~
.. Julien J. Studley, Inc.
,
HOUSING AND REDEVELOP:MENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 99-4
Resolution recommending the City Council actively pursue the acquisition of the
Goeman/Chadwick properties for industrial development
and authorize city staff to begin preparation thereof.
WHEREAS, the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority ("Authority")
endorses the City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan and the Community Vision and Governing
Policies; and
WHEREAS, the Authority endorses the economic development efforts of the City of
Monticello through the administration of the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. I
Plan and the Marketing Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Authority previously committed a total of$150,000 toward the
acquisition or development of industrial land; and
WHEREAS, the Authority previously requested the City Council match the Authority's
$150,000 for acquisition or development of industrial land; and
WHEREAS, the City Council previously committed a total of$150,000 toward the
acquisition or development of industrial land; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the
Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority as follows:
1. Acquisition of said properties will control land prices.
2. Acquisition of said properties will control and simplify development schedules.
3. Acquisition of said properties will diversifY ownership of industrial lands.
4. Acquisition of said properties will provide for a competitive market.
5. Acquisition of said properties will allow for flexibility in deal structuring.
6. Preparation for acquisition of said properties places the City of Monticello first in-
line to acquire.
\\ ~J
~-
.,
,
HRA Resolution No. 99-4
Page 2
Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment
Authority this 9th day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
u~<O)~ /
Executive Director
HRA Chair
,
,
~
,.i4TY
;f . '1'1 VE
/"OCT. 3. 2000 11: 20AM
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES
All Countiell
~/09/00
Mi......50t. II_in; Finance AgeneV
INcQME LIMITS ~O MAXIMUM RENTS
COUNTY 0085 wiNONA
30" ~J
351 ~l
401 ~I
451 AMI
5~AMl
551 AMI
60% AMI
801 AMI
1201 AMI
,'OX Nfl
30l AMI
351 Nfl
40XNtJ
451 AlII
SOl AMI
551 MI'
601 Nfl
. Nn
~...lt NU
, "OX Ntl
EFFECTIVE 03/09/00 MEDIAN INCOME (AMI) 49. BOO
_.._0._...__.0. INCOME LIMITS BY HOUSEHOLD SIZE .--.-.-......--
1 2 '3 I, 5 6 7 8
10,320 11,820 13,290 14,760 15,930 17,'30 18,300 19,470
12,040 13,790 15,505 17,220 18,585 19,985 21,150 22,715
13,760 15,760 17,720 19,680 21,240 22.&'0 24.400 25,960
",480 11,730 19,935 22,140 23,695 25,695 21,450 29,205
17,200 19,700 22,150 24,600 26,550 28,550 30,500 32,450
18,920 21.670 24,365 27,060 29,205 31,405 33,550 35,695
20,640 23,640 26,!iSO 29,520 31,860 34,260 36,600 38,940
27,550 31.500 35,400 39.350 42,500 45,650 48,800 51,950
41,280 47,280 53,160 59,040 6l,nO 6&,520 73,200 n,aeO
48.160 5!i,16O 62,020 68,180 74,340 79,940 85,400 90,860
.._... RAXI~ GROSS RENTS BY HOUSEHOLD siZE (PRE 1990) ..-...-
1 Z 3 I, 567 B
258 295 332 369 391 628 457 486
301 344 381 430 464 499 533 567
344 394 .It] 492 531 571 610 649
387 "3 498 553 597 642 686 730
430 49~ 553 615 663 711 762 al I
473 541 609 676 730 785 838 892
516 591 664 738 196 156 91' 973
68S 781 885 913 1,062 1,141 1,220 1,298
1.032 1,182 1.329 1,476 1,593 1.113 1,830 1.941
1,204 1,379 1.550 1,722 1,858 1.998 2,135 2,271
CQUNTY 0086 ~IGMT
NO. 3681
P. 2/2
PAGE 11 43
REPORT ., COR830
DATi RUN 03/10/00
_~ MlXI~ GROSS RENTS ., aEORQQM SIZE (POST 1989) --
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
258 276 332 311 428 412 486
301 322 3&7 4/.7 4" SSO 567
344 369 44:$ 511 571 629 649
381 415 498 515 642 708 730
430 461 553 639 713 786 811
471 507 609 703 785 865 892
S16 553 664 767 856 944 973
688 738 885 1,023 1, 14' 1 ,259 1,298
1,032 1,107 1,329 1,53~ 1.713 1.888 ',947
1,204 1,291 1,550 1.790 1,998 2,203 2,271
EFFECTIVE 03/09/0D "SOIAH INCOME (~J) 68,600
i .~...__._.._.._ INCOME LIMITS 8Y "OUSEHOLD siZE _._.~..-..-_._-
'ti 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 8
,l
,I! ,.30% A!41 13.800 15,760 17,730 19.710 21,300 22,660 24,450 26,010
,\,
" J5% AMI 16,100 18,4'0 20,685 22,995 24,8~O 26,670 28,525 30,345
;~
i~ 40%~1 18,400 21,040 23,640 26,280 28,400 30,480 32,600 34,610
45,," AMI 20,700 23,670 26,S9S 29 ,565 31,950 34,290 36,675 39,015
SOll: AMI 23,000 26,300 29L550 32,850; 35.500 :sa, 100 40.750 43,:S50 ~
551 AMI 25,300 28,930 32,505 36,135 39,050 41,910 44,825 47,685
60); ~I ~ ,~35,460 39,420 42,600 45,720 48,900 5Z,0~0 -t
80X AMI 35,150 40,150 45,200 50,200 54.200 58,250 6Z,250 66.250
20X NIl 55,200 63,120 70,920 71,840 115,200 91,440 91.800 104,040
(,01 AMI 64,400 13,640 82,740 91,980 99,400 106,680 114,100 121,380
_..._. NAXI"uM GROSS RENTS BY HOUSEHOLD SIzE (pRE 1990> -...... ._ MAXIMUM GROSS RENTS BY aEDRoaH SiZE (POST 1999) .-
1 2 3 4 5 " 7 a 0 1 Z 3 4 5 f
301 AMI 345 394 443 492 532 571 6" 650 345 369 443 512 571 630 65C
35% AMI 40Z 460 5 574 621 666 713 758 40Z 431 517 598 666 735 7S~
'OX A/III 460 6 91 657 0 815 867 460 493 '" 683 762- 841 86;
.;,5X "'1 517 59 664 739 19 916 975 517 554 D64 768 857 946 97!
SOIAKI 575 738 821 88 1,018 1,083 575 616 .rn 854 952 1,051 1,oa
-
55" AMI 632 12 903 " 1,120 1,192 632 677 B12 939 1,047 1,156 1,19
60X Aiel 69 985 1,22Z 1.300 690 739 , 1,025 1,1'3 1,261 1,30
-
60X AMI 1,ZS5 ,556 1,656 &78 941 1,130 1,305 1,456 1 ,606 1,65
120% Nt) ,9 . ' 2, 5 Z,601 1,JIJO 1,479 1,713, 2,050 2,286 2,523 2,6(
'4:J~ Nn 2, 99 2,852 3,034 1,610 1,7Z5 2,068 2,392 2,667 2,943 3,O~
\ \ f\.\
S
'i
u
\l:
'jjj
III
1lI
U
.0
Uw
.Ew
->0
~.ao
as III 0
.. .~ N
"'U-
Ji' '':: ~
Ill_
- - c:I)
!:'! ell ..
.: &0
$ _Ill /II
'l
~i:1
i~
'~ ~
i
1:1
H
o
~i
!~
-
;
II
~~
li
t
~
CD N 8 r') N In .,. lnco
N'" 'lJ''ltCD......
,.....00,...,.......
ancn,,:o;ciNo)
r')r')t')NNIn......
....
r')
~
I
j
~8 g~8~""
.....co ..,.IonO-
uian<lt,aiMri":
NNZ Nt')~
-
.
s
i
i
'"
"'''''Ln''''(')QCD~
......N,........,....cnLn'"'
C'\l...cno:t-&nCD
,.: ,.: ....... vi M ~ ri
NNN N('Il......
CD
i
.;
.!
l
GlOSN-8..,.N.....
1I)C'\l In.... IonN
r')"" M.... Ion
":ailtirri":":cO
&n.......,...-mll)
"!.
....
...
(') N llCl co 0 co II) CD....
Ocn.....MQMC
C")CDlncntn..&n
oaitii";OrD-i
(')NC")C'\lN..,.1I)
~
...
cnoglOgll)C")8
MN 0 8....
Q)(I)O!t)1O 0'1-
,.: ..: .n 0 ....... <<J ~
,...,...-IOC')coli>
~'II"""'" ,....,.r-.
,.:
11
~
u
1
~
o
MCClOOOgQ~
o - 8 II' III 0 ...
Oeo MCtJO,......
CO,.:~.-.ONCO
NN r')........:;
..;
00 _lftocnN
~~ 8~8:
MM<.cO.,;t<i,.:
MM_..N....CD
z
""
IQMNCOllQCQr')!2
OCN,...M-CQ'"
OGl(')OC'l,lMN
":C'i..ttii-iri.n
MNC")N-....O
"":.
....
E E
c ::l ::l
S ,!! Q) & E.j; ~
.1""8 i:e ~ ~...
\
..
g
'jjj
III
.~
~
III
-g
~
g
III
G)
o
c
ri
~
"2
III
1lI
a:l
-0
::I
Q
o
~
>
c:
o
,
\ \ P.
OCT-03-2000 TUE 10:32 AM WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC FAX NO. P. 02/05
iJ'~~ ~/~. .
~ \ "'---0 ...).B... {f\ (\, I Y
(.7 ).tJ vJ.'f~ '0l' v V ~
ECONOMTC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A NoN-PROFIT PRlvATEiPUi\L1C PAR1'NllIl.SHIP
\ _...__' .__..,...--' BUSIN ESS-l;EAJ)-==-Turkey' Prucessing-Facility
~.."--_.,,
_I!f..,"......
Return to tile Dep=-rtolent of Trade and Ecollomic De\lelopmellt by end of business day
Wednesday, October 4, via fax at 651-296-5287 and please copy me on your proposal.
Sony for the short notice - I have jusl returned to the office today from maternity leave and this
lead was on my desk from DTED,
If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 763-477-3086. Thank you.
___111_______...._---------------..-------------..----------------
Project Information
Cargill, an agricullure company, under its North American Turkey Operations business unit is
working with the Minnesota Independent Turkey Growers Association to form a 50/50 joint
venture to establish a bag bird processing facility. The plant will process 150 milJion live pounds
or between 6 _ 8 million live turkeys per year. Total plant investment will be between $25-35
million. Total employment is expected to reach 350 people. Marketing of the prodUt.1 will be
managed by Cargill under their private label "Honeysuckle White" or under contract with other
brands,
Exi~tin~ Building Requirements
125,000 to 150,000 square feet on 25~30 acres and suitable parking, Minimum of20 foot clear
ceilings. At least one dock and one drive-in.
.Jobs
275-350 permanent jobs in two years.
Utilities Requirement
. Electricity: 20 million kilowatt hours per year
. Gas: 700,000 ccs annually, peak demand 80.000
. Telephone: T1 line or greater
. Acres: between 25-30 acre parcel
. Transportation: 40-50 truck trips in and out or plant per day - access to rail is desired bllt
not a must
. Water: 800.000 gallons per day or 208 million gallons per year with capacity to expand to
250 million gallons per year \ \ ','
~~ ~_ ....'" <ann r..~~.,.. nu";,,, 'Rnr'''l'ClRD. MN 55373 (612) 477~30B6; FAX (6J2) 477-3054 ~ I
OCT-03-2000 TUE 10:32 AM WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC
FAX NO,
p, 03/05
. Sewer: waste water discharge is equal gallon to gallon of intake.
B.O.n. loadings: untreated = 1,200 mglliter; pretreated - 300 mglliter
Oil/grease: nla
Suspended solids: 275 mg/liter
Additional Information
Description ofthe available location, including prior use, total acres, available services and
utilities, access to interstate, proximity to your location and asking price.
,
OCT-03-2000 TUE 10:32 AM WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC
FAX NO,
p, 04/05
.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A NON~PRom PRlvATElPUOL.lC PARlN~RSHIP
BUSINESS I.EAD - Industrial Louver Manufacturer
........
".,......-
_1."_
..... ...
...,."..,."
!{eturn to me by October 17 via fax at 763-477-3054 or
mail to PO Box 525, Rockford, MN 55373.
.If you have any questions or comments. please call me at 763-477-3086. lhank you.
~_________~__~_______________________~___________~________________~___________._~_----a--_---.-------*---.-~~-~
Project Information
industrial Louvers has been manufacturing louvers for 20 years in the city of Delano. They a.re in
need of expanding and have no room for expansion where they are currently located. Industrial
Louvers has notified the City of Delano of their search for a new site.
Land/8uilding Requirements
They cun'ently have a 5&,000 square foot building on seven acres. Their new facility will be
100.000 square feet so would need approximately 14-16 acres, depending on your eity
ordinances. and allowing for futllre expansion.
.Jobs
, Have 70 employees currently and would add about 30 more. Average wages arc $12/hour. plus
benefits.
Pll~9se respond with available land, description of laud and location and askill2 price
(estimate or range is fine).
__ ~ _ ___ __ ___~ .....~...~ n~~v~~"" Ul'J 1;1;.\7\ (1)12\ 417.3086: FAA (612) 477.3054
OCT-03-2000 rUE 01:55 PM WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC
FAX NO.
P. 01/01
i
.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A NON-PRom PRlvATE!PU8LlC PARTNEll.."lHIP
MEMORANDUM:
DATE:
O(..1oher 3,2000
TO:
Wright County Cities
Linda Goeb Mary DeGiovanni
Debbie Millner Don Levens
Sue Vergin Doug Borglund
Ollie Koropchak Barb Swanson
Nancy Evers Bob Derus
Merlon Auger
City of Delano
Sharon Leintz.
Debbie Ryks
Carol Banken
\
FROM:
I Jeidi Peper. Executive Director
RE:
Business Lead... what a busy first day back!!!!
,-"'---
"'I~ ,.. '"
Please respond to the lead below, include informalion on local incentives and any other
allachments you deem appl'opriate. J will include the Wright County marketing piece, labor force
statistics and demographic information.
Return to me by Monday, October 9, via fax at 763-477-3054 or
mail to PO Box 525, Rockford, 55373.
If you have any questions or comments. please call me at 163411-3086. Thank you.
Company Information
This is a six-ycar.old company that specializes in in-store advertising and displays. In 2000. they
will supply ovcr 15,000 supermarkets and mass merchants with parls and programs and ship lo
more than 40 states and Canada. They are in need of expanding and will make a location
decision as soon as feasible.
LandfBuilding Requirements
Looking for either existing building Or new construction. Need approximately 5,000 sq. ft. -
combination of ofl1ce1wareh{)use space (30% ofiice). 15' ceilings and at least onc dock needed if
existing building. Acreage needed would be dependent on your city's codes/ordinances.
JobslWa~es
Currently have six employees. anticipates adding an additional four-six with this expansion.
Average wages are $30,000-40,000 per year, indudes benefits.
i
OCT-03-2000 TUE 11:31 AM WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC FAX NO.
P. 01/01
.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A NON-PRom PRlVATH/PUBLlC PARTNE~I1l"
MEMORANDUM
DA TE:
October 3, 2000
\
Wright County Cities
Linda Gocb Mary DcGiovanni
Debbie Millner Don Levens
Sue Vergin Doug Borglund
Ollie Koropchak Barb Swanson
Nancy Evers Bob Derus
Merton Auger
Kathleen Miller
Sharon Leinlz
Debbie Ryks
Carol Banken
TO:
1i\I~OM:
Heidi Peper, Executive Director
RIG:
Business Lead
...,.'\.......,... -~'""'!'f"""'-
.' . "... ,.
,..., ..,..... ,J.,.~/.r'
Please respond to the lead below, include information on local incentives and any other
attachments you deem appropriate (financial incentive not critical issue to client). I will include
the Wright County marketing piece, labor force statistics and demographic information.
Return to me by Monday, October 9, via fax at 763-477~3054 or
mail to PO Box 525, "Rockford, 55373.
If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 7G3-477~3086. Thank you.
...------
--------------..------...------------
Company Information
This is a manufacturing and distribution company that is currently located in Dassel. They intend
10 move their distribution departments (sales and marketing) to another location. They have been
in business for 30 years
Building Requirements
They are looking for an existing building (buy or lease, prefer lease) that is 6,000 - 7,000 square
feet ~~ all office space. Want to be in by January 2001.
.Jobs/Wages
28 jobs with additional 5-10 in !lix. months. The wages average $9 per hour hut they are willing
to increase to be competitive.
~ ," ~ ~__~_ .~_.... ~_ .......,..,1 .... ~. """"11\ A1"'~ ..,ni:"t
OCT-03-2000 TUE 10:33 AM WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC
FAX NO.
P. 05/05
@
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A NON-PRo!'rr PRlVATElPUBLIC PAR.ThISR~HIP
.. ...----...,.
".,,-B-HSlNESS-bEAD - Residential
. . ~~~
".""",,",
~.,~-"
.".~
.-.,~
Return proposal to me by October 10, via fax at 763-477-3054 or
mail to PO Box 525, Rockford, 55373.
Jfyou have any questions or comments, please call me at 763~477-3086. Thank you.
_______._______.._..____----........,.a--
-....-----
------------..----
Project Information
Anchor Properties is a multi-residential builder. They are currently developing 176 apartments
on 8.8 acres ofland in Chaska. They arc looking to build a similar project in Wright County.
Information Needed
I.and
_ How much land does your ciLy have available - if any - for this type of residential
development'? What stipulations arc associated with such a projecL?
- What is the price of the land?
_ Contact informaLion. if ditTerent from the city.
_ Li$t all ordinances that would affect such a project.
_ Is land ready for development? If not. what needs to be done?
\
~... .. ___ ..,,'" ~ ,,"" 1:'. ~~....,... T'l~,,,,, 12fV'1(~n"n. MN 55373 (612) 477-3086; PAX (612.) 477-3054