The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 02-13-2017AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, February 13, 2017 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Academy Room 5 p.m. Downtown Art Park Grant Application Workshop Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting/Workshop Minutes from January 23, 2017 • Regular Meeting Minutes from January 23, 2017 C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda D. Citizen Comments E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • Presidents Day Hours • Spring Tree Sale • Small Area Study Engagement Activity F. Council Liaison Updates • Hwy 25 Coalition • Parks Commission • BCOL • IEDC • Planning Commission • EDA • 1-94 Coalition G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update • Liquor Store • DMV 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of approving a Therapeutic Massage Enterprise License for Lily's Massage located at 141 E. Broadway, Suite 2 E. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for the March Madness 5K to take place on March 18, 2017, sponsored by the Monticello High School Track/CC Booster Club F. Consideration of approving an application for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be conducted by the Wright County Ducks Unlimited Chapter 39, in conjunction with their annual banquet on May 1, 2017 G. Consideration of appointing Michael Mossey as Monticello Fire Chief as recommended by Fire Department personnel and appointing him as a representative to the Fire Relief Board of Trustees H. Consideration of authorizing City staff to explore the transition of City Council Agendas and other items to a Paperless Solution I. Consideration of appointing a representative to the Industrial/Economic Development Committee (IEDC) J. Consideration of approving purchase of Fibernet video equipment for a total cost of $41,353.20 K. Consideration of approving the 2017 Wright County Annual Highway Maintenance Agreement L. Consideration of authorizing the purchase of a 2017 Tymco 600 street sweeper with a 2017 Navistar 4300 International Chasses through the Capital Equipment Fund at $165,615 state contract price per the noted specifications M. Consideration of approving Ordinance No. 660 adopting the 2017 City of Monticello Official Zoning Map N. Consideration of approving a request for Simple Subdivision resulting in two buildable parcels in the R-1 (Single -Family Residence) District to facilitate right of way for 7th Street Fallon Avenue, per City Ordinance Title 11, Chapter 1, Section 7. Applicant: City of Monticello (NAC) O. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-04 of calling for a public hearing for vacation of 1201h Street right-of-way remnant parcels P. Consideration of approving Ordinance 661 amending City Code of Ordinances - Title 8, Chapter 3 — Trees and Shrubs Q. Consideration of authorizing an appraisal on the former municipal bio -solids property for the purpose of decisions regarding future sale 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-05 accepting the Feasibility Report, setting a public hearing for February 27, 2017, and the residential reconstruction rate for the 2017 Street and Utility Improvements Project, City Project 16C003 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, January 23, 2017 — 4:30 p.m. North Mississippi Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta Absent: None Others: City staff: Wayne Oberg, Angela Schumann, Shibani Bisson, Rachel Leonard, Tom Moores, Sarah Rathlisberger, Jim Thares, and Mark Redinger 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. 2. 4:30 p.m. Gillard Avenue Improvements Shibani Bisson, WSB/City Engineer, presented a review of future Gillard Avenue Improvements. The project goals included addressing speeds, safety, and street design. The presentation included recommendations for proposed street design and safety improvements; drainage improvements; and estimated costs and funding. Mr. Bisson recommended to widen roadway to 32 -feet on the east side with curb and gutter with parking allowed on one side. She proceeded to present a short term solution and a long term solution for the County Road 39/Gillard Avenue Intersection. The following members of the public spoke: Mark Stanslaski, 9821 Gillard Avenue. Mr. Stanslaski expressed support for a 95th Street extension. He commented that there is a high level of traffic on Gillard and this would be reduced if 95th was constructed. In his opinion, because of new development, there is a need for another outlet to the freeway. Mr. Stanslaski questioned how a roundabout would be affordable when extending 95th street has a high cost. Kevin Fair, 9681 Gillard Avenue. Mr. Fair expressed frustration with the City because they allowed development to increase with only the one roadway. (Gillard Avenue). Greg Skindelien, 9834 Gillard Avenue. Mr. Skindelien expressed concern that widening the road would increase the traffic. Ed Davis, 9804 Gillard Avenue. Mr. Davis disagrees with the speed data and feels that drivers travel at much higher speeds than reported. He invited Councilmembers to position themselves on his property and watch the traffic. Mr. Davis is in support of extending 95th Street to Broadway. City Council Special Meeting Minutes—January 23, 2017 13 John Gurney, 9691 Gillard Avenue. Mr. Gurney is concerned that the speed data is flawed. He believes problems would be solved with another outlet. Mr. Gurney commented that the individuals driving the high speeds are not those living on Gillard Avenue. Kevin Knop, 9741 Gillard Avenue. Mr. Knop commented that as more development takes place, like Sunset Ponds, the greater need of another outlet. William Pitts, 9714 Gillard Avenue. Mr. Pitts expressed support of extending 95th Street. He also commented that widening Gillard Avenue will only encourage the drivers to increase their speed. Martin Hackenmueller, 9651 Gillard Avenue. Mr. Hackenmuller disagrees with the policy that only those living on Gillard Avenue are being assessed. He feels that the road has deteriorated from traffic going to Sunset Ponds. He would like to see speed bumps installed every 100 feet. Mike Ludwig, 9750 Gillard Avenue. Mr. Ludwig requested that stop signs be put in at the intersection of Gillard Avenue and 97th Street. He also commented that a flashing yellow arrow is needed at the transition zone between 45 to 55 mph on CR 39. In his opinion Gillard Avenue residents are not the primary benefactors of the project. Mr. Ludwig also expressed concern about culverts on the east side of the roadway. Discussion ensued among the City Council. Mayor Stumpf stated that he is not in favor of widening Gillard Avenue to a 32 foot roadway, curb/gutter, or on -street parking. There was continued discussion on the widening of the road. A majority of the councilmembers were open to different widths of roadway from 28 — 32 feet. Most didn't support on -street parking. Tom Moores, Street Superintendent, recommended the width of 32 feet for reasons that included safety and increased visibility. Councilmember Fair is in favor of widening to 32 feet with lighting, signage, etc. He stated that this should be treated as an urban street. Councilmember Davidson spoke in support of curb/gutter, striping, and placing a stop sign at 97th Street. Councilmember Hilgart is fine with a 32 foot road and curb/gutter but doesn't support on -street parking. Councilmember Gabler expressed concern about the speed drivers are driving and that there should be zero tolerance for speeding on all of Monticello roadways. Councilmember Hilgart questioned moving the 45 mph sign east and Mayor Stumpf questioned lowering the speed on County Road 39. Ms. Bisson responded that MnDOT did a speed study of the area but more detail can be provided to them for further review. Councilmember Fair moved approval of widening Gillard Avenue to a 32 foot roadway with curb & gutter, dynamic signage, and to look into a stop sign at 97' Street and lowering the hill. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1; Mayor Stumpf voted against for reasons listed above. City Council Special Meeting Minutes—January 23, 2017 13 3. 5:50 p.m. Review of Remaining 2017 Road Reconstruction Projects Shibani Bisson reviewed the remaining street projects which include 95th Street, Haug Avenue, 90th Street, Mississippi Drive, Hart Boulevard West, Hart Boulevard East, and Sandberg Road. She presented estimated project costs and funding. The total project costs, with Gillard, is estimated at $1,988,542. 4. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes—January 23, 2017 1 3 REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, January 23 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. with a quorum present. The pledge of allegiance was recited. B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Regular Meeting Minutes from January 9. 2017: Councilmember Fair moved approval of the January 9, 2017, City Council minutes. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda • Animal Control Ordinance (Councilmember Gabler) • Stop Sign on Gillard Avenue and 97th Street (Mayor Stumpf) D. Citizen Comments • None. E. Public Service Announcements • None. F. Council Liaison Updates • EDA — Councilmember Hilgart commented that the EDA members discussed existing and future industrial property. • MOAA — Mayor Stumpf noted that the group discussed solar farms and voted to deny allowing solar in the MOAA area. • I-94 Coalition — Councilmember Gabler stated that the coalition was provided a Legislative preview. There was discussion on attending Transportation Day at the Capitol on February 16, 2017. • WCAT — Councilmember Hilgart commented that WCAT continues to add buses. • MCC Advisory Board — Mayor Stumpf stated that the board discussed having a mobile friendly website and the age requirement of 11 years old for children being allowed in the facility unsupervised. City Council Minutes —January 23, 2017 Page 1 14 • Mayor Stumpf also updated the public on the Special Meeting held prior to the City Council meeting in regard to 2017 road improvements which include Gillard Avenue. G. Department Updates Jeff O'Neill gave updates on the following items: 1) National Guard Deployment Ceremony scheduled for January 28, 2017 at the high school. 2) The MN Public Broadband Alliance met in Scott County. Scott County is acting as the fiscal agent for the group. The Alliance amended their fee structure to account for the size of counties and cities. 3) There will be two sessions of a City Council workshop related to goal setting. Mr. O'Neill encouraged the City Council to look at their schedule to review possible dates for the workshop. Carolyn Jackson, Flaherty and Hood, gave a presentation on the Coalition of Utility Cities. The coalition has seven member cities and is currently meeting with new Representatives and Senators and educating them on the issues facing the CUC. There was a brief discussion on the Sherco plant in Becker and future plans. Ms. Jackson mentioned that the Coalition is reviewing the current Electric Generation Tax, tax reform and plans for 2017 and beyond. Sean Deringer, Wright County Sheriff's Office, presented the office's quarterly report. Mr. Deringer compared 2016 final quarter activity to 2015. This activity included data from Patrol, Criminal Investigations, Major Crimes Investigation Unit, School Resources Officers, and Special Investigations Unit. Mark Berkholz, Arvig, gave a review of the 4th quarter. Mr. Berkholz commented on the following: number of subscribers; capital budget; future projects; video content; and rates. Discussion ensued in regard to the purchasing policy of the City. Since Arvig receives funds from the City to purchase equipment, they need to follow the City's Purchasing Policy. 2. Consent Agenda Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the consent agenda excluding A and H. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires and departures for the MCC. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: No report this cycle. City Council Minutes —January 23, 2017 Page 2 14 D. Consideration of approving an application for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be conducted by the Wright County Pheasants Forever in conjunction with their Annual Membership Banquet on March 4, 2017. Recommendation: Approved the charitable gambling permit for the Wright County Pheasants Forever for event on March 4, 2017. E. Consideration of amending the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapters and Subsections as follows. Applicant: City of Monticello • Chapter 2, Section 4(F) — Site Plan Applications • Chapter 4, Section 1(H) — Standards for Site Landscaping • Chapter 4, Section 1(J) — Zoning District Specific Landscaping Standards • Chapter 4, Section 5(J) — District Regulations • Chapter 4, Section 8(E) — Standards Applicable to All Uses • Chapter 5, Section 2(D) — Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses • Chapter 5, Section 2(F) — Regulations for Commercial Uses • Chapter 5, Section 3(B) — General Standards and Limitations for Accessory Uses and Structures • Chapter 5, Section 4(E) — Specific Standards for Temporary Uses • Chapter 8, Section 2(B) — Lots • Chapter 8, Section 4(B) - Definitions Recommendation: Adopted Ordinance No. 659 approving amendments to the zoning ordinance based on a finding that such amendments are consistent with the City's long-term land use goals and other stated findings in Planning Commission Resolution PC -2017-002 and adopted Summary Ordinance 659A for publication. F. Consideration of approving Biosolids Farm Lease Agreement. Recommendation: Approved the lease agreement with Mark Holker. G. Consideration of approving submission of the 2017 Pay Equity Report. Recommendation: Approved submission of the 2017 Pay Equity Report. H. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-02 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment for the TH 25/CSAH 75 Improvements, City Project No. 100009. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. I. Consideration of renewing membership in the I-94 West Corridor Coalition for 2017 in the amount of $6,568. Recommendation: Approved a contribution of $6,568 to the I-94 West Corridor Coalition to renew the City's membership for 2017. 2A. Consideration of items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills. City Council Minutes —January 23, 2017 Page 3 14 Mayor Stumpf moved approval of the bills excluding the payment of $41,353.20 to Arvig. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. H. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-02 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment for the TH 25/CSAH 75 Improvements, City Project No. 100009. Councilmember Gabler questioned whether the cost of traffic control was addressed for the upcoming TH 25/7th St. project. Shibani Bisson concurred that this was considered with the project. Councilmember Gabler moved to adopt Resolution 2017-02 accepting the improvements and authorizing final payment to Valley Paving for the TH 25/CSAH 75 Improvements, City Project No. 100009. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Regular Business: A. Consideration of adopting an undated Socia"edia Policv. Rachel Leonard, Communications Coordinator, provided a brief review of the updated Social Media Policy. There was minimal discussion. Councilmember Fair moved to adopt the updated Social Media Policy. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Additional Items: • Councilmember Gabler requested that staff work with the Animal Control Officer to update the Animal Control ordinance. City Clerk Jennifer Schreiber will bring an updated Ordinance to a future meeting for review. • Considering the Special Meeting held prior to the City Council meeting, Mayor Stumpf commented that he considers it a necessity to install a stop sign at Gillard Ave. and 97th St. for safety reasons. Mayor Stumpf moved to install stop sign (3 -way stop), and related signage, at Gillard Avenue and 97th Street. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 7:58 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes —January 23, 2017 Page 4 14 2016 Report Deputy Registrar (DMV) Mission Statement The Monticello Department of Motor Vehicles provides a vital connection between the state and the city. Our well-trained staff administers a variety of Minnesota's licensing and titling laws with integrity while serving our community with enthusiasm and respect. On behalf of our customers, we contribute to the prosperity of the City of Monticello, and we commit to being yaLa. public advocate to the State of Minnesota. 2 L7Ld�t�.r +Iti+dr.e. p My CLAXT � 7 e6u T �Af 0u+n� �.a��r4► � # +r+ �a kin►., i�r. �4. � ��o� n� �y�tS� j �arr�++� � 1 2, nff� rNk'j l+1Ai�,1{llLtrl. p4ltl of L r1 fil l ovi .4a ,y t -kil +wrr , Product/Unit Classification Market Growth Low High Cash Cow - Strategies • Maintain aggressive marketing • Improve efficiencies • Sell more to existing customers • Reach out to new customer groups 5 k r :, • � I] iTA LTA f-f At_` r ,a 00 � I] iy� LTA F 7 � I] iy� LTA Numbers Matter DMV TRANSACTIONS 55, 51,508' 53,592' 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 MM10462 72,135 75,89 M58j257 67, 62,999' 62,42 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 DMV Revenue I I SMV I ransact-ion I VDE DIV Transaction Types G/F O.S DL DNR 1.91 8.3% Motor Vehicle 89.0% I 2016 DMV NUMBER COUNT Motor Month DNR G/F DL Vehicle TOTAL Jan 802 23 84 5,752 6,661 Feb 533 11 98 61P617 7,259 Mar 508 43 124 7,476 8,151 Apr 659 119 85 6,163 7,026 May 810 164 104 6,128 7,206 Jun 567 69 124 5,333 6,093 Jul 425 46 137 51429 6,037 Aug 282 26 155 5,914 6,377 Sep 193 35 135 4,798 5,161 Oct 215 17 143 41935 5,310 Nov 272 21 157 4,512 4,962 Dec 1052 26 119 4,451 5,648 TOTALS 6,318 I 600 I 1,465 I 67,508 75,891 Revenue $2-$7 $1 $8 $6-10 DMV (in thousands) 2012 Revenues $455 Expenditures (282) Net Change -Ops $173 2013 $456 (289) $167 Estimate 2014 2015 2016 $498 $536 $562 (300) (316) (327) X100 lctoo/l cz0Qr- SMV transaction D2 2015 Aft MW 725135 DMV 2012 2013 2014 Transactions 62,999 62,420 67,462 Revenue $ 7.23 $ 7.31 $ 7.38 $ Cost $ 4.48 $ 4.63 $ 4.44 $ Net Revenue $ 2.75 $ 2.68 $ 2.94 $ Hours worked 107736 10,491 117606 Transactions FTE 12,205 12,376 12,090 Transactions PHr 5.87 5.95 5.81 2015 2016 725135 75,891 7.43 1$ 7.40 4.37 $ 4.30 3.06 $ 3.10 10,834 13, 849 6.66 4innesota Population 4onticello Population ivlonticello population % of state Monticello DMV % of state-wide transactions Ratio of transaction to population 5,519,952 13,299 0.24% 1.25% 5.2 DMV Operations Earned high ratings on survey, including the communication, courtesy and knowledge categories (62 dealers and customers responded). Continue with quarterly employee recognition. This has helped many areas such as team building and customer service. Increased promotion through liquor store flyers and utility bill inserts. 17 Mission Deliver excellent customer service = Make ,,oney! ip Questions/Comments 19 Cash Cow - Budgeting Because a cash cow can be so important to a company's overall financial health, it is essential to budget for its continued success. Invest in equipment and infrastructure that enables you to meet demand for high -profit items, and devote resources to monitoring demand and feedback in order to make necessary adjustments. 20 Cash Cow - Budgeting Although a cash cow can be an ongoing source of high -margin revenue, few products and services are entirely self-sustaining. Because a cash cow can be so important to a company's overall financial health, it is essential to budget for its continued success. Invest in equipment and infrastructure that enables you to meet demand for high -profit items, and devote resources to monitoring demand and feedback in order to make necessary adjustments. 21 Cash Cow - Marketing Cash cow products tend to be exceptionally profitable, so marketing resources dedicated to raising awareness about them tend to be money well spent. Unless your cash cow is an established product that markets itself and demonstrates consistent sales, make an ongoing commitment to supporting it through sales and promotion. Provide free samples to opinion leaders and experiment to find the most -effective advertising channels. Target and track your marketing investments and results. It is often wort�utting extra money into marketing a cash flow product, because its high mas will provide more revenue than sales of lower-marqid' Cash Cow - Marketing Make an ongoing commitment to supporting it through sales and promotion. Provide free samples to opinion leaders and experiment to find the most -effective advertising channels. Target and track your marketing investments and results. It is often worth putting extra money into marketing a cash flow product, because its high margins will provide more revenue than sales of lower -margin items. 23 2016 Report Hi -Way Liquors G Hi -Way Liquors Our mission is to promote the safe, responsible sale of alcohol in the greater Monticello area. We are committed to providing our customers with a clean, professional, and fun atmosphere so they can enjoy a memorable shopping experience. We believe,,in-co-mmunity engagement and investing in the future of Monticello. 2 Numbers Matter Hi -Way Liquors El Hi -Way Liquors Estimate' (in thousands) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Revenues $4,855 $5,087 $5,166 $5,490 $5,449 Cost of Sales (3,640) (3,768) (3,877) (3,970) (4,070) Gross Profit 11215 11319 11289 11520 11378 Expenditures (611) (643) (648) (802) (779) Net Change - Ops. $604 $676 $642 $719 $600 Transfers Out/(I n) $3)500 $650 $600 $450 $350 H i -Way Sa I e s by Categor - 20 1 Wine Liquor 16 30% Misc. Beer 3% 51% 2016 Monthly Sales by Category $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 100 $150,000 .00 $100,000 $50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Beer Liquor Wine Sales Sales Category 5 yr cia nge Beer 19% Liquor 21% Wine 19% Tota 1 19 2016 Keystroke software (sales) upgrade Counter and display improvements 9 onstruction NOT TO May -7'.'7% j of ov } -0.8% Jul -2.8% Aug -.1.70/a 10 .1 im were ffirs mace to the finit I 'En-%rlirf. alrleralral»l•d• lov AW. Irge4nsIN, Hardin Fain I��.�e�1�1..•. I6re!g Gagner A Jim Urnnzerll. P �rord Seising PeYriorenamare s b. e►fist Single Uny Sulehs 971.192 412/23/171 'Desi Mougle Ever S695.509 J+S3.-P.892 +G%f Wait until next year! Big Beginning .T [meat River Shopper Header's Choice Awards ,�, 01 OPW *Best Liquor Store 'Rest wine Selection *next Beer Selection ITV4- hemp wars lledi Lialuer Store 7 494si r.i 8 year@4 12 POURING ALL OF OUR PROFITS 7-mr, Y•# .• BACK NTO THE COMMUNITY! j M4CIfY C}F �1d HI -WAY LIQUORS 545 Hwy 25 N., Monticello 763-295-5322 Vk Questions/Comments C 14 Cash Cow - Marketing Make an ongoing commitment to supporting it through sales and promotion. Provide free samples to opinion leaders and experiment to find the most -effective advertising channels. Target and track your marketing investments and results. It is often worth putting extra money into marketing a cash flow product, because its high margins will provide more revenue than sales of lower -margin items. 15 Mission ➢To Make Moneyl -G 16 Cash Cow - Budgeting Because a cash cow can be so important to a company's overall financial health, it is essential to budget for its continued success. Invest in equipment and infrastructure that enables you to meet demand for high -profit items, and devote resources to monitoring demand and feedback in order to make necessary adjustments. 17 Cash Cow - Budgeting Although a cash cow can be an ongoing source of high -margin revenue, few products and services are entirely self-sustaining. Because a cash cow can be so important to a company's overall financial health, it is essential to budget for its continued success. Invest in equipment and infrastructure that enables you to meet demand for high -profit items, and devote resources to monitoring demand and feedback in order to make necessary adjustments. Cash Cow - Marketing Cash cow products tend to be exceptionally profitable, so marketing resources dedicated to raising awareness about them tend to be money well spent. Unless your cash cow is an established product that markets itself and demonstrates consistent sales, make an ongoing commitment to supporting it through sales and promotion. Provide free samples to opinion leaders and experiment to find the most -effective advertising channels. Target and track your marketing investments and results. It is often worth utting extra money into arkeing a cash flow product, because its high mas will provide more revenue than sales of lower-marqid' y.,TR' aye`/5�y\fl 06'1 7'I[ L7Ld�t�.r +Iti+dr.e. D M� CLAXT � 7 e6u T �Af 0u+n� �.a��r4► � # +r+ �a kin►., i�r. �4. � ��o� n� �y�tS� j �arr�++� Ah 2, nff� CA'fNk'j p4ltl of L r1 fil l ovi .4a ,y t -kil +wrr , 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 SMV Transact-ion TVDe DMV Monthly Transaction Count Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Annual I ransactfon I vne. Measurement Motor vehicle transactions DNR transactions Game & Fish transactions Driver's license transactions Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 89.0% 88.1% 89.5% 89.2% 88.6% 88.4 9.7% 10.3% 9.3% 8.7% 9.2% 8.8 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6 0.8% 1.0% 0.5% 1.3% 1.5% 2.2 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 c� c� 30,000 �— 20,000 10,000 �R: Transactions vs Revenues 2009 2010 Transaction Count 2011 2012 DMV Revenue $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 2013 City Council Agenda: 2/13/17 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 vavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $991,688.62. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson T Printed: 02/01/2017 - 9:O1AM Batch: 00215.01.2017 - 215.01.2017 Xcel/CPE Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 1 01/31/2017 5843395-5 10.38 01/31/2017 217-41990-438100 01/31/2017 5863599-6 175.21 01/31/2017 101-42700-438100 01/31/2017 5806932-5 34.67 01/31/2017 101-45201-438100 01/31/2017 5821009-5 181.85 01/31/2017 101-42200-438100 01/31/2017 5799425 374.13 01/31/2017 101-43127-438100 01/31/2017 5799427 86.10 01/31/2017 101-43127-438100 01/31/2017 5820786 171.42 01/31/2017 101-43127-438100 01/31/2017 5837384 1,112.25 01/31/2017 101-43127-438100 01/31/2017 5864452-7 563.45 01/31/2017 101-45501-438100 01/31/2017 5788570-9 389.43 01/31/2017 609-49754-438100 01/31/2017 5804618-6 15.00 01/31/2017 101-45201-438100 01/31/2017 5768542-2 316.92 01/31/2017 101-41940-438100 01/31/2017 5768542-2 7,328.68 01/31/2017 226-45122-438100 01/31/2017 5768542-2 118.84 01/31/2017 101-45175-438100 01/31/2017 5768542-2 158.46 01/31/2017 101-42800-438100 01/31/2017 5828859-8 67.70 01/31/2017 101-41940-438100 01/31/2017 8235333-5 112.29 01/31/2017 101-41941-438100 01/31/2017 8000015233-2 2,295.31 01/31/2017 602-49480-438100 Check Total: 13,512.09 Vendor: 2405 WELLS FARGO - Monthly Charges/Returns Check Sequence: 2 January 2017 Wells Fargo account interest earnings -1,958.07 01/31/2017 101-00000-362110 January 2017 Wells Fargo account service charge 2,801.78 01/31/2017 101-41520-443980 January 2017 MCC CC Fees (WF- Front Desk) 1,644.13 01/31/2017 226-45122-443980 January 2017 MCC CC Fees (WF- Online) 68.97 01/31/2017 226-45122-443980 January 2017 MCC CC Fees (iAccess - Fmrs Mkt) 83.90 01/31/2017 226-00000-220100 January 2017 Liquor Store cc Fees (WF) 7,118.32 01/31/2017 609-49754-443980 January 2017 Liquor Store cc Fees (WF) 15.00 01/31/2017 609-49754-443980 January 2017 City Hall cc Fees (WF) 127.70 01/31/2017 101-41520-443980 January 2017 Utility cc Fees (Bluefin) 175.55 01/31/2017 601-49440-443980 January 2017 Utility cc Fees (Bluefin) 175.56 01/31/2017 602-49490-443980 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/01/2017 - 9:01 AM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number January 2017 Utility cc Fees (AmEx) 10.82 01/31/2017 601-49440-443980 January 2017 Utility cc Fees (AmEx) 10.83 01/31/2017 602-49490-443980 January 2017 FiberNet cc Fees (WF) 78.00 01/31/2017 656-49870-443980 January 2017 MCC Returns 1/11/17 63.00 01/31/2017 226-00000-115031 January 2017 MCC Returns 1/11/17 90.50 01/31/2017 226-00000-115031 January 2017 MCC Returns 1/12/17 120.00 01/31/2017 226-00000-115031 January 2017 FNM Vanco Return 1/18/17 91.84 01/31/2017 656-00000-202099 Check Total: 10,717.83 Vendor: 1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 3 1/31/2017 51-4400193-4 - 801 Broadway E 17.25 01/31/2017 101-43160-438100 1/31/2017 51-6572904-0 - WWTP 13,088.58 01/31/2017 602-49480-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505905-0 - Water 6,167.92 01/31/2017 601-49440-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505906-1 - Sewer 1,271.64 01/31/2017 602-49490-438100 1/31/2017 51-0395766-0- Pumphouse 405 Ramsey 113.40 01/31/2017 601-49440-438100 1/31/2017 51-4271112-2- Library 933.95 01/31/2017 101-45501-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505907-2 - Parking Lots 10/31-12/1/2016 163.95 01/31/2017 101-43120-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505907-2 - Parking Lots auto protec. light 1 49.59 01/31/2017 101-43120-438100 1/31/2017 ZZZNEP-IMPLEM - 51-6505908-3 - Civil Defe 17.55 01/31/2017 101-42500-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505909-4 - DMV/ Food Shelf 224.21 01/31/2017 217-41990-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505910-7 -Hi-Way Liquor 1,807.54 01/31/2017 609-49754-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505911-8 -City Hall 1,623.97 01/31/2017 101-41940-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505911-8 -MCC 7,355.64 01/31/2017 226-45122-438100 1/31/2017 51 -6505911 -8 -Senior Center 382.11 01/31/2017 101-45175-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505911-8 -National Guard 191.06 01/31/2017 101-42800-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505912-9 -Animal Shelter 74.96 01/31/2017 101-42700-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505913-0 -Fire Station 437.67 01/31/2017 101-42200-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505914-1 - Shop/Garage 895.03 01/31/2017 101-43127-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505915-2 Parks 269.87 01/31/2017 101-45201-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505915-2 - Water I 132.92 01/31/2017 601-49440-438100 1/31/2017 51-6505916-3 - Street Lights 14,014.27 01/31/2017 101-43160-438100 1/31/2017 51-0371645-4 - Parks Swan Cam 19.29 01/31/2017 101-45201-438100 1/31/2017 51-7780310-4 - Building Inspec. Garage 46.90 01/31/2017 101-41940-438100 1/31/2017 51-9391437-3 - 6th St.Floor 1 & 2 173.14 01/31/2017 101-41941-438100 1/31/2017 ZCULPS-EXPENS 51-0623082-8 - 349 W Broa 18.05 01/31/2017 213-46522-438100 Check Total: 49,490.46 Reference ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/01/2017 - 9:01 AM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Total for Check Run: 73,720.38 Total of Number of Checks: The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 02/13/2017 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/01/2017 - 9:01 Alva) Page 3 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 02/02/2017 - 10:11AM Batch: 00203.02.2017 - 203.02.2017 Liquor Invoice No Description Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3152557 resale - beer 157.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 57144000 resale - liquor 57144000 resale - wine 57144000 freight 57238900 resale - liquor 57238900 resale - wine 57238900 freight 95221500 resale - condiments 95221500 resale -juice 95221500 freight 95230800 resale - shotglasses 95254000 freight 95254000 resale - olives 02/02/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S 221934 resale - soda pop 221934 resale -juice 221935 resale - beer 224451 resale - soda pop 224451 resale juice 224452 resale -beer 227016 resale - soda pop 227016 resale -juice 227017 resale - beer 227018 resale - beer Amount Payment Date Acct Number Moiiii6effo Y Reference 1,101.82 Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False 157.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 157.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425500 1,641.25 02/02/2017 Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 608.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 96.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 17.60 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 52.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 214.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 8.10 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 52.99 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 16.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425500 0.32 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 15.06 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 0.10 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 21.65 02/02/2017 609-49750-425500 1,101.82 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/02/2017 - 10:11 AM) Page 1 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 103.20 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 49.20 02/02/2017 609-49750-425500 1,641.25 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 91.95 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 32.80 02/02/2017 609-49750-425500 825.10 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 96.25 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 49.20 02/02/2017 609-49750-425500 1,436.60 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 36.85 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/02/2017 - 10:11 AM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Page 2 Check Total: 4,362.40 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPII Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 1080581753 resale - ligiuor 4,334.48 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 1080581753 resale- wine 1,384.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 1080581753 freight 50.47 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 1080581864 resale - wine 56.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 1080584843 resale - wine 1,356.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 1080584843 resale - liquor 1,640.51 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 1080584843 freight 47.86 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 1080584934 resale - beer 246.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 1080587714 resale - ligiuor 3,610.25 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 1080587714 resale - wine 128.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 1080587714 freight 47.04 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 12,900.61 Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True 669113 resale - beer 97.50 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 97.50 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 1232214 resale - beer 1,254.50 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 1232317 resale - beer 902.35 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 1232317 resale - beer n/a 25.10 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 138600 resale - beer 22,723.60 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 138600 resale - beer n/a 144.90 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 138690 resale - beer credit -176.80 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 139019 resale - beer 17,630.54 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 139195 resale - beer 1,166.28 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 139195 resale - beer n/a 33.60 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 139383 resale - beer 360.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 139546 resale - beer 444.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 139564 resale - beer 9,142.90 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 139564 resale - beer n/a 242.40 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 139678 resale - beer 264.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 139846 resale - beer credit -212.20 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 53,945.17 Vendor: 1680 EPIC PRODUCTS INC Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False 0504841 resale - gift bags; corkscrews; flasks, etc 467.10 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/02/2017 - 10:11 AMI) Page 2 Invoice No Description Check Total Vendor: 1259 Check Total: Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 227662 (650) R900 V4 Wall MIU meters CM021329 (110) R900 Radios V4 Wall MIU credit 2624316 Check Total: Vendor: 1206 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 16330 resale - wine 16330 freight 5630204 Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 872281 resale - beer 873625 resale - beer Check Total Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2607114 resale - beer 2609746 resale - beer credit inv. #2607114 2624316 resale - beer 2624316 resale - beer n/a 2624316 freight 69,641.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 5630204 resle - liquor 5630204 freight 5632468 freight 5632468 resale - liquor 5633841 resale - liquor 5633841 freight 5633842 freight 5633842 resale - wine 5635003 resale - liquor 5635003 freight 5635004 freight 5635004 resale- wine 5635004 resale- wine n/a Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 467.10 Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False 69,641.00 01/24/2017 601-49440-422701 -11,785.40 01/24/2017 601-49440-422701 57,855.60 Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 852.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 15.75 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 867.75 Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 150.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 255.50 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 405.50 Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 860.45 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 -10.95 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 4,023.40 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 112.36 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 3.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 4,988.26 Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 7,734.17 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 53.88 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 20.16 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 1,300.96 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 5,068.25 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 51.84 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 129.60 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5,554.30 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 7,420.44 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 81.11 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 24.95 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 983.90 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 33.35 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/02/2017 - 10:11 AM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 5637419 resale- liquor 4,643.88 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 5637419 freight 59.05 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5637420 freight 21.60 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5637420 resale- wine 679.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 5638675 freight 20.16 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5638675 resale- liquor 1,910.70 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 5638676 resale- wine 1,776.05 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 5638676 resale- mix 108.85 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 5638676 freight 54.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5638677 resale -beer 21.99 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 5639950 resle - liquor 8,557.07 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 5639950 freight 108.47 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5639951 freight 53.77 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5639951 resale - wine 1,690.20 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 5639951 resale - mix 32.99 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 5639952 resale -beer 98.40 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 5642280 resle - liquor 1,285.43 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 5642280 freight 15.84 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5642281 freight 12.96 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5642281 resale- wine 472.40 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 5643584 resale - liquor 2,359.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 5643584 freight 38.88 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5643585 resale - wine 3,482.65 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 5643585 freight 133.91 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5644993 freight 54.48 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5644993 resale- liquor 4,631.24 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 5644994 resale- wine 1,278.25 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 5644994 freight 25.92 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 5644995 resale - beer 25.60 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 610724 resle - wine credit inv #5618583 -12.41 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 610725 resle - wine credit inv #5624814 -14.32 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 610726 resle - liquor credit inv #5628997 -252.60 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 610726 freight credit inv #5628997 -2.88 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 611040 resale- wine credit inv. #5617208 -9.71 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 611041 resale - wine credit inv # 5633842 -9.71 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 611255 freight credit inv #5630204 -1.44 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 611255 resale - liquor credit inv #5630204 -228.75 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 611256 resale - wine credit inv #5630205 -7.58 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 611256 freight credit inv #5630205 -0.12 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 611885 resle - wine credit inv. #5638676 -38.85 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 611885 freight credit inv.#5638676 -1.44 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/02/2017 - 10:11 AM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/02/2017 - 10:11 AM) Page 5 Check Total: 61,529.84 Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP Check Sequence: 13 230598 resale - cigarettes; juice 646.14 02/02/2017 609-49750-425500 230598 resale - tobacco; can coolers; flasks; etc 343.60 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 231363 resale - cigarettes; juice 1,010.83 02/02/2017 609-49750-425500 231363 resale - tobacco; soda pop; stoppers 263.90 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 2,264.47 Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 14 8576449 resale - wine 3,139.84 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 8576449 freight 41.25 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 8577897 resale- wine 996.99 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 8577897 freight 11.25 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 4,189.33 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 15 2105561 resale - liquor 5,001.03 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 2105561 freight 90.83 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 2106392 freight 66.95 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 2106392 resale - liquor 5,050.14 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 2106393 resale - wine 1,202.45 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 2106393 freight 27.36 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 2108130 freight 50.39 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 2108130 resale - liquor 3,518.40 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 2108919 resale - liquor 3,687.35 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 2108919 freight 49.20 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 2109851 resale - liquor 4,856.60 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 2109851 freight 50.40 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 2109852 freight 24.48 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 2109852 resale - wine 817.90 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 2109852 resale - wine n/a 22.75 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 2109852 resale -juice 50.28 02/02/2017 609-49750-425500 2111464 freight 7.20 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 2111464 resale -liquor 700.50 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 2112295 resale - liquor 1,374.15 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 2112295 freight 15.84 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 2113204 freight 48.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 2113204 resale - liquor 4,639.20 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 2113205 resale - wine 1,424.10 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/02/2017 - 10:11 AM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2113205 freight 32.16 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 256010 resale - wine credit inv. #2102189 -316.50 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 256010 freight credit inv. #2102189 -8.64 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 256193 resale - liquor credit inv. #2078219 -53.40 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 256194 resale - wine credit inv. #2081379 -30.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 256195 resale - liquor credit inv. #2098135 -20.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 256196 resale - beer credit inv. #2101465 -3.64 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 256718 resale - liquor credit inv #2054774 -6.79 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 256719 resale - liquor credit inv #2108130 -156.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 256719 freight credit inv #2108130 -1.44 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 32,211.25 Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS, Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 1499929 resale - liquor 4,002.10 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 1499929 freight 44.63 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 1499930 freight 58.10 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 1499930 resale - wine 2,902.51 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 1502400 resale - liquor 1,549.32 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 1502400 freight 14.70 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 1502401 freight 19.60 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 1502401 resale - wine 810.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 9,400.96 Vendor: 1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: True 1200784 resale - beer 5,652.67 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 1203791 resale - beer 80.25 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 1203792 resale - tonic 14.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 1204154 resale - beer 13,511.30 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 1207174 resale - beer n/a 20.45 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 1207175 resale - beer 33.95 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 1207525 resale - beer credit -818.05 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 1210620 resale - beer 12,432.07 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 1210622 resale - mix 64.00 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 156-139 resale - beer 123.33 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 156-144 resale - beer credit -29.35 02/02/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 31,084.62 Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 1880433 resale - soda pop 234.50 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 1880559 resale - soda pop 210.75 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/02/2017 - 10:11 AM) Page 6 Invoice No 1885896 Vendor: 1684 0171572 0171572 0171572 0172073 0172073 0172073 0172073 Vendor: 1573 7117015 7117015 7117855 7117855 Description resale - soda pop Check Total: VINOCOPIA resale - wine resale - liquor freight resale - wine resale - liquor resale - n/a beer freight Check Total: WINE MERCHANTS INC resale - wine freight resale - wine freight Check Total Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: Amount 274.00 719.25 224.00 224.00 12.50 96.00 500.51 120.00 16.50 1,193.51 932.74 10.55 682.00 7.20 1,632.49 281,374.43 20 Payment Date Acct Number 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Sequence: 19 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 02/02/2017 609-49750-425100 02/02/2017 609-49750-425400 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Sequence: 20 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 02/02/2017 609-49750-425300 02/02/2017 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 2/13/2017 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/02/2017 - 10:11 AM) Page 7 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 02/08/2017 - 3:28PM Batch: 00204.02.2017 - 204.02.2017 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 2925 1 ST LINE/LEEWES VENTURES LLC 123971 395.75 Flavored Syrups for Concession Check Total: Vendor: 1002 A E MICHAELS DECORATING CENTER INC 40869 Rubber Flooring in Free Weight & Workout Are, 226-45127-453010 31,977.97 Check Total: Vendor: 3974 A+ TAXI OF MONTICELLO INC 20131130 December 2016 - 910 Rides 3,333.33 Check Total: Vendor: 2589 ALL ELEMENTS INC 4312 Materials- (5) leaks @ 909 Golf Crs Rd- reflashc 4312 Labor - 5.5 hrs -(5) leaks @ 909 Golf Crs Rd- re 60.76 Check Total: Vendor: 1020 ALMCO HYDRAULICS INC 16890 101-43127-440100 Preventative Mute. InpectionBaler Check Total: Vendor: 1039 AQUA LOGIC INC 45780 139.00 Service ETS U.V - Check Bulbs, Replace Fitting 12/31/2016 609-49754-431990 Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3156123 resale - beer Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 395.75 02/14/2017 226-45125-425410 395.75 Check Sequence: 2 31,977.97 02/14/2017 226-45127-453010 31,977.97 Check Sequence: 3 3,333.33 12/31/2016 101-45178-431990 3,333.33 Check Sequence: 4 60.76 02/14/2017 101-43127-440100 412.50 02/14/2017 101-43127-440100 473.26 Check Sequence: 5 139.00 12/31/2016 609-49754-431990 139.00 Check Sequence: 6 768.16 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 768.16 Check Sequence: 7 61.70 02/14/2017 609-49750-425200 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 1065 Check Total: 61.70 Check Sequence: 10 Vendor: 4502 ARVIG 5.40 02/14/2017 Check Sequence: 8 259994 Border States; Calix Jan 2017 7,118.24 02/14/2017 656-49877-421800 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -646.02 12/31/2016 656-00000-362900 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings 116.23 12/31/2016 656-00000-362900 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -514.01 12/31/2016 656-00000-341190 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -1,404.93 12/31/2016 656-00000-362920 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -44,491.05 12/31/2016 656-00000-380510 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -60,311.49 12/31/2016 656-00000-380520 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -16,747.84 12/31/2016 656-00000-380522 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -22,319.77 12/31/2016 656-00000-380530 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -351.75 12/31/2016 656-00000-380531 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -357.64 12/31/2016 656-00000-380532 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -7.80 12/31/2016 656-00000-380533 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -1,805.00 12/31/2016 656-00000-380542 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -4,326.00 12/31/2016 656-00000-380557 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -197.28 12/31/2016 656-00000-380558 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings 1,816.96 12/31/2016 656-00000-380545 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings 2,879.91 12/31/2016 656-00000-380546 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Fees 70,926.69 12/31/2016 656-49870-430600 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Management Fees 12,500.00 12/31/2016 656-49870-430700 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Fixed Fees 77,756.39 12/31/2016 656-49870-430800 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Credit Card Deposits 169.24 12/31/2016 656-00000-202099 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Vanco Deposits 13,813.94 12/31/2016 656-00000-202099 Dec 2016 Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings 42.44 12/31/2016 656-49870-443200 Check Total: Vendor: 4046 AST SPORTS INC 17799 Polo Shirt TE 33,659.46 Check Sequence: 9 26.98 02/14/2017 101-41800-443990 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 2 Check Total: 26.98 Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 10 57440500 freight 5.40 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 57440500 resale - wine 136.00 02/14/2017 609-49750-425300 57440500 resale - liquor 72.00 02/14/2017 609-49750-425100 95315500 resale - mix 31.49 02/14/2017 609-49750-425500 95315500 freight 0.15 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 245.04 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S 222494 Resale - pop, water, juice 225054 Resale - pop, water, juice, milk 00992330 Check Total: Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC 57719 UB Qtr 4 2016 (3835) Print, Fold, Inserts, Enve 57719 UB Qtr 4 2016 (3835) Print, Fold, Inserts, Enve 2016 SRU -2 Check Total: Vendor: 3632 BRIAN BRAMLEY 7901 dba Emergency Response Sol. - (1) Hlemet 7941 dba ERS. - (5) Fire Dex Gloves Check Total: Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPII 1080590857 resale - liquor 1080590857 resale - wine 1080590857 freight ACH Check Total: Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC 674585 resale - beer Amount Check Total: Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC 00081725 Monthly Tank Rental 00992330 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (156 lbs) 00993677 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (118 lbs) False Check Total: Vendor: 2804 CLEARWATER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2016 SRU -2 SRU Training 2016 correction (6) missed hrs Ca Check Total: Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC 140221 resale- beer Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 779.30 02/14/2017 226-45125-425410 539.50 02/14/2017 226-45125-425410 1,318.80 Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 789.75 02/14/2017 601-49440-431800 789.74 02/14/2017 602-49490-431800 1,579.49 Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True 287.97 02/14/2017 101-42200-421120 429.67 02/14/2017 101-42200-421120 717.64 Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 2,607.61 02/14/2017 609-49750-425100 112.00 02/14/2017 609-49750-425300 27.65 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 2,747.26 Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: True 191.00 02/14/2017 609-49750-425200 191.00 Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 45.00 02/14/2017 226-45126-431900 58.20 02/14/2017 226-45124-421600 50.60 02/14/2017 226-45124-421600 153.80 Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 60.00 12/31/2016 101-42200-433100 60.00 Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 300.00 02/14/2017 609-49750-425200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 300.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4628 DAIKIN APPLIED 3125620 Boiler - Actuator, Temp Controller, Switch ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 2440 DESIGN ELECTRIC INC 4455 Material -Sch. Blvd- bowl alley W. light; 7th St.1 4455 Labor- Sch. Blvd- bowl alley W. light; 7th St. li€ Check Total: Vendor: 1140 DEX MEDIA EAST INC Acct 110130145 Enabled: White & Yellow Pages ad 2017 24.30 02/14/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 4620 DON STEVENS LLC 3125621 02/14/2017 Repaired Heating Valve & Replaced Exhaust Fat Check Total: Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 451023 Health & Wellness Ad# 637672 452535 BDH & Young PH Ad# 645747 452536 Enabled: 201706 - PH for 2017 Offical Zoning Map Ad# 682.50 02/14/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1170 FASTENAL COMPANY MNMON99159 (400) asst. sign bolts NINMON99207 Disposable Ear Plugs (400) Check Total: Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 0229319 12/31/2016 (60) meters - R900 V4 Wall MIU 0229656 (2) 3/4 T10 MTR USG 671.33 Check Total: Vendor: 1179 FIRE SAFETY USA INC 96690 (3) 50' 8D Fire Hose, coupled NH Male x Femal, Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 300.00 Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False 2,328.27 12/31/2016 226-45126-431990 2,328.27 Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: False 24.30 02/14/2017 101-43127-440100 284.00 02/14/2017 101-43127-440100 308.30 Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: False 682.50 02/14/2017 609-49754-434990 682.50 Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False 671.33 12/31/2016 101-41940-440100 671.33 Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: True 290.00 02/14/2017 226-45122-434990 101.53 02/14/2017 101-41910-435100 92.30 02/14/2017 101-41910-435100 483.83 Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 47.46 02/14/2017 101-43120-422600 74.20 02/14/2017 226-45126-421990 121.66 Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 6,428.40 02/14/2017 601-49440-422701 349.49 02/14/2017 601-49440-422701 6,777.89 Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False 425.00 02/14/2017 101-45201-421650 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 425.00 50.00 50.00 29.70 29.70 159.40 82.69 82.69 449.96 94.20 94.20 1,074.73 1,713.09 1,536.03 1,536.03 254.69 29.68 284.37 15,210.00 51,675.00 66,885.00 1,273.05 50.40 Check Sequence: 27 02/14/2017 601-49440-432770 02/14/2017 656-49877-432770 02/14/2017 601-49440-432770 02/14/2017 656-49877-432770 Check Sequence: 28 02/14/2017 601-49440-422700 Check Sequence: 29 02/14/2017 226-45126-421990 02/14/2017 226-45124-421600 02/14/2017 226-45124-421600 02/14/2017 226-45124-421600 Check Sequence: 30 02/14/2017 101-42200-440500 Check Sequence: 31 02/14/2017 101-42200-421200 02/14/2017 226-45126-421200 Check Sequence: 32 02/14/2017 101-00000-217061 02/14/2017 101-00000-217061 Check Sequence: 33 02/14/2017 609-49750-425200 02/14/2017 609-49750-425400 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 5 Check Total: Vendor: 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC 7000576 2017 Annual Facility Operator Fee - 1/2 Water 7000576 2017 Annual Facility Operator Fee - 1/2 FNM 7010575 (44) tickets Jan. 2017 - 1/2 Water 7010575 (44) tickets Jan. 2017 - 1/2 FNM Check Total: Vendor: 1218 HACH COMPANY 10263975 (2) Test Kit, 5 -EP Hardness 0-30GPG- Water Check Total: Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC 4015516 Pool Chemicals 4018201 Pool Chemicals 4019184 Pool Chemicals 4019568 Pool Chemicals Check Total: Vendor: 1239 HOGLUND BUS COMPANY INC 125101 Engine 1- Left rear brakes- Pads; Kit; etc Check Total: Vendor: 1242 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE 01182017 12/24-1/15/2017 Fire Acct 1400-017-223-399 01182017-2 MCC Broom fuel slips- acct 1400-003-767-337 Check Total: Vendor: 3971 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGINEERS LOCAL March 2017 March Health Insurance - Union March 2017 March Health Insurance Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2624380 resale - beer 2624380 resale - beer n/a Amount Payment Date Acct Number 425.00 50.00 50.00 29.70 29.70 159.40 82.69 82.69 449.96 94.20 94.20 1,074.73 1,713.09 1,536.03 1,536.03 254.69 29.68 284.37 15,210.00 51,675.00 66,885.00 1,273.05 50.40 Check Sequence: 27 02/14/2017 601-49440-432770 02/14/2017 656-49877-432770 02/14/2017 601-49440-432770 02/14/2017 656-49877-432770 Check Sequence: 28 02/14/2017 601-49440-422700 Check Sequence: 29 02/14/2017 226-45126-421990 02/14/2017 226-45124-421600 02/14/2017 226-45124-421600 02/14/2017 226-45124-421600 Check Sequence: 30 02/14/2017 101-42200-440500 Check Sequence: 31 02/14/2017 101-42200-421200 02/14/2017 226-45126-421200 Check Sequence: 32 02/14/2017 101-00000-217061 02/14/2017 101-00000-217061 Check Sequence: 33 02/14/2017 609-49750-425200 02/14/2017 609-49750-425400 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,323.45 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 5647588 freight 5647588 609-49750-425100 resale- liquor 5647589 02/14/2017 resale- wine 5647589 15.84 freight 5647590 resale - beer 612901 609-49750-425200 freight credit inv #5643584 -1.44 02/14/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED MN190-00101 General EDA Matters Through 12/31/16 MN325-00031 Conveyance of Fred's Auto Property Through 12 Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 3829 STEVE LANGANKI 1040 12/31/2016 Porta Toilets (6) Nov. & Dec.2016 service; (1) 4 513.00 Check Total: Vendor: 2626 HARRY LANTTO Jan 2017 Check Sequence: 36 EDA Meeting Recording 1/11/17 Jan 2017 12/31/2016 City Council Meeting Recording 1/9/17 830.36 Check Total: Vendor: 1290 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 249336 Check Sequence: 37 2017 Leadership ConfNew Councilman 1/27 & 60.00 02/14/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1291 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 1846 LMCIT Claim #C0031502 Deduct Date of Loss Check Total: Vendor: 1292 LEROY JOB TRUCKING INC 18536 650.00 Animal Charge (5) Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,323.45 Reference Page 6 Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: False 41.76 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 3,296.71 02/14/2017 609-49750-425100 528.35 02/14/2017 609-49750-425300 15.84 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 80.00 02/14/2017 609-49750-425200 -1.44 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 3,961.22 Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: False 152.00 12/31/2016 213-46301-430400 361.00 12/31/2016 213-46301-430400 513.00 Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: True 830.36 12/31/2016 101-45201-431990 830.36 Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: True 60.00 02/14/2017 213-46301-431990 60.00 02/14/2017 101-41110-431990 120.00 Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False 650.00 02/14/2017 101-41110-433100 650.00 Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False 1,000.00 12/31/2016 101-42100-430410 1,000.00 Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: True 58.50 02/14/2017 101-42700-431990 58.50 Page 6 Invoice No Description Vendor: 3896 M & M CARPET & UPHOLSTERY CLEANIN 1296 Carpet Cleaning @ Library Check Sequence: 41 Check Total: Vendor: 1229 MARRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC 1392 101-45501-443990 Business Cards - Council - WF, JJ 1392 Business Cards - Council - MM Check Total: Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 20160319 Check Sequence: 42 (285) gal unleaded @ $2.09 20160320 True (989) gal diesel @ $2.24 02/14/2017 101-41110-443990 Check Total: Vendor: 1314 MCDOWALL COMPANY 232757 101-42200-421990 Maintenance Agreement Contract - C0520 - Qtrl Check Total: Vendor: 2996 METRO APPLIANCE RECYCLING 5829932 (116) used auto tires Check Sequence: 43 Check Total: Vendor: 1327 MIDSTATES EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 217037 101-43120-421200 (30,232) polyskin packaging sealant- Maxwell N Check Total: Vendor: 3437 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES SOI -055028 cs Alive Bacteria; (2) glass clean; cs Bowl Clean 2,808.83 Check Total: Vendor: 1330 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 400451000729 (220) Transactions - December 2016 Check Sequence: 44 ACH Check Total: Vendor: 4174 MN PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY 1/3/2017 14C002 - MPFA-Semi Annual Loan Repayment Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False 550.00 02/14/2017 101-45501-443990 550.00 Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: True 131.00 02/14/2017 101-41110-443990 65.50 02/14/2017 101-42200-421990 196.50 Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: True 596.13 02/14/2017 101-43120-421200 2,212.70 02/14/2017 101-43120-421200 2,808.83 Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 457.00 12/31/2016 226-45126-431900 457.00 Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False 986.00 02/14/2017 101-43127-421990 986.00 Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False 16,174.12 02/14/2017 101-43120-422400 16,174.12 Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: False 282.93 02/14/2017 101-45201-421600 282.93 Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: True 198.00 12/31/2016 101-42100-431990 198.00 Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False 8,878.95 02/14/2017 602-00000-165010 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 8,878.95 Check Total: Vendor: 1360 MN SAFETY COUNCIL 002964 2017 2017 Membership Dues 525.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1375 MONTICELLO PRINTING INC 1/17/2017 (20) Vehicle Mntc. Books - Streets 1/20/2017 (30) Training Rep; (20) Ledger Sht; (3) Blueprin 1/4/2017 Impound Reports (1,000) 02/14/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1097501-00 Triple Bagger Hopper Kit; Blower Kit; Wt. Brck 02/14/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 2518 NEOFUNDS BYNEOPOST 2/3/2017 Postage Purchased 2/3/17 2/3/2017 Postage for Pkgs to Dept Public Safety - Jan 201 2/3/2017 Pkg to Kennedy Graven 1/26/17 101-45201-424100 Check Total: Vendor: 4616 NORTHSTAR MACHINING LLC 101490 dba Beckius Repair- 20017 Sterling Dump plug i Check Sequence: 53 Check Total: Vendor: 4368 OFFICE DEPOT INC 897306447001 Rm. Astro Brite Pap; doz pens; (3) 2" binders 897306573001 2pk Gorilla super glue 02/14/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC 54281 Labor- trblsht pole- GFI replaced 54281 Material -GFI self -test; Cover hvy dty metal 54410 Replace 4 Ballasts 54411 Labor- 150 W Brdwy- selct. switch; cont. blk; bz 54411 Materials; selector switch; cont. block; ballast; si 54436 Contract to retro -fit cobra Head pole to LED Amount Payment Date Acct Number 8,878.95 12/31/2016 101-43160-431990 61.52 12/31/2016 Check Sequence: 50 525.00 02/14/2017 101-41800-443300 525.00 12/31/2016 101-43160-431990 237.44 12/31/2016 Check Sequence: 51 287.44 02/14/2017 101-43120-421990 72.35 02/14/2017 101-42200-421990 423.00 02/14/2017 101-42700-421990 782.79 Check Sequence: 52 3,653.53 12/31/2016 101-45201-424100 3,653.53 Check Sequence: 53 1,000.00 02/14/2017 101-00000-155010 131.80 02/14/2017 217-41990-432200 5.95 02/14/2017 213-46301-432200 1,137.75 Check Sequence: 54 82.00 02/14/2017 101-43120-422100 82.00 Check Sequence: 55 46.99 02/14/2017 101-43110-421990 4.74 02/14/2017 101-43110-421990 51.73 Check Sequence: 56 156.00 12/31/2016 101-43160-431990 61.52 12/31/2016 101-43160-431990 142.92 12/31/2016 226-45122-431990 528.00 12/31/2016 101-43160-431990 237.44 12/31/2016 101-43160-431990 999.50 12/31/2016 101-45201-440100 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description 54486 Material- socket- 150W Brdwy ballast replacema 54486 Laborsocket- 150W Brdwy ballast replacement 176.00 Check Total: Vendor: 3372 ON CALL SERVICES 2767 Indoor Play Structure Maintenance 02/14/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 4345 OPG -3 INC 1635 Laserfiche Software Assurance Plan (LSAP) - 3/ 02/14/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 2114964 resale - liquor 2114964 freight 2114965 freight 2114965 resale - wine 2114965 resale - n/a beer 257246 resale - credit wine 609-49750-425400 Check Total: Vendor: 1455 RED'S MARATHON 1/12/17 Parks #230 Diesel fuel 1/4/17 Parks #206 Ford battery Jan 2017 Diesel Truck # 116- problem w/ pump at shop- P` Check Total: Vendor: 4411 MARK REDINGER 01/25/2017 Mileage Reimb - MNDOT Certification Classes Check Total: Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC 653260 Food for Concession Resale 653260 Freight 661063 Freight 661063 Food for Concession Resale 668572 Food for Concession Resale 668572 Freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number 10.71 02/14/2017 101-43160-431990 176.00 02/14/2017 101-43160-431990 2,312.09 02/14/2017 Check Sequence: 57 200.00 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 200.00 02/14/2017 101-45201-422110 171.55 02/14/2017 Check Sequence: 58 3,122.00 02/14/2017 702-00000-431900 3,122.00 Check Sequence: 61 241.82 02/14/2017 Check Sequence: 59 1,041.85 02/14/2017 609-49750-425100 10.08 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 10.08 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 315.25 02/14/2017 609-49750-425300 108.75 02/14/2017 609-49750-425400 -53.40 02/14/2017 609-49750-425300 1,432.61 02/14/2017 226-45125-425410 Check Sequence: 60 30.93 02/14/2017 101-45201-421300 126.00 02/14/2017 101-45201-422110 171.55 02/14/2017 101-43120-421200 328.48 Check Sequence: 61 241.82 02/14/2017 101-43115-433100 241.82 Check Sequence: 62 684.82 02/14/2017 226-45125-425410 7.99 02/14/2017 226-45122-433300 7.99 02/14/2017 226-45122-433300 512.60 02/14/2017 226-45125-425410 376.90 02/14/2017 226-45125-425410 7.99 02/14/2017 226-45122-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,598.29 494.76 494.76 360.00 360.00 1,593.75 1,593.75 187.50 187.50 2,740.50 2,740.50 1,872.20 9,681.44 11,553.64 100.00 100.00 12.60 1,416.05 38.87 1.40 1,354.72 Check Sequence: 63 02/14/2017 609-49754-421990 Check Sequence: 64 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Sequence: 65 02/14/2017 101-42700-431200 Check Sequence: 66 12/31/2016 101-41910-431990 Check Sequence: 67 12/31/2016 656-00000-220250 Check Sequence: 68 02/14/2017 101-00000-208020 02/14/2017 101-00000-208020 Check Sequence: 69 02/14/2017 101-42200-431990 Check Sequence: 70 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 02/14/2017 609-49750-425100 02/14/2017 609-49750-425500 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 02/14/2017 609-49750-425300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 10 Check Total: Vendor: 2987 RETAIL RESOURCE LLC 222203132 utx- (66) 100pk bottleneck sign Check Total: Vendor: 1470 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC A29235 Installed New Lock; Repair Panic Bar on Doors; Check Total: Vendor: 1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL Feb 1st Semi Monthly Contract Payment Check Total: Vendor: 3827 SAMBATEK INC 09143 Code Updates: Project Admin Services thru 12/3 Check Total: Vendor: 4627 SCOTT COUNTY 2016 Bal BLANDN - Project Balance Payment - Scott Coi Check Total: Vendor: 2497 SHERBURNE WRIGHT CABLE COMMISSIC 01/30/2017 Cable PEG Fees - TDS/Bridge Water Q4 2016 01/30/2017 Cable Franchise Fees - TDS/Bridge Water Q4 2C Check Total: Vendor: 1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON 965203 Jan. 2017 cleaning service - Fire Hall Check Total: Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. 1504971 freight 1504971 resale - liquor 1504972 resale - mix 1504972 freight 1504973 resale - wine Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,598.29 494.76 494.76 360.00 360.00 1,593.75 1,593.75 187.50 187.50 2,740.50 2,740.50 1,872.20 9,681.44 11,553.64 100.00 100.00 12.60 1,416.05 38.87 1.40 1,354.72 Check Sequence: 63 02/14/2017 609-49754-421990 Check Sequence: 64 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Sequence: 65 02/14/2017 101-42700-431200 Check Sequence: 66 12/31/2016 101-41910-431990 Check Sequence: 67 12/31/2016 656-00000-220250 Check Sequence: 68 02/14/2017 101-00000-208020 02/14/2017 101-00000-208020 Check Sequence: 69 02/14/2017 101-42200-431990 Check Sequence: 70 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 02/14/2017 609-49750-425100 02/14/2017 609-49750-425500 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 02/14/2017 609-49750-425300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1504973 freight 29.40 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 2,853.04 Vendor: 2564 SPORTS PRO LLC Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: True 210 Parts - Work Order #612 -Stair Master, Treadmi 498.75 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 210 Labor - Work Order #612 -Stair Master, Treadm 190.00 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 219 Labor - Elliptical #C8, C9 Treadmill C37 150.00 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 219 Parts - Elliptical #C8, C9 Treadmill C37 569.90 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 220 Labor - Treadmill C28, C21, C24, C27, C93 Par 220.00 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 220 Parts - Treadmill C28, C21, C24, C27, C93 Part 516.85 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 236 Labor - Qtrly Prevent Maint: Ellipticals (11) Tre; 545.00 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 2,690.50 Vendor: 1937 CITY OF ST MICHAEL Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: False 01182017-1 SRU Training 2016 (27.75) hours- Reimb. by Ca 745.20 12/31/2016 101-42200-433100 Check Total: 745.20 Vendor: 3594 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT, LLC Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False 2793545 TriMark- asst. bags; pap.cs.-towels; cs.-santz. wi 309.18 02/14/2017 609-49754-421990 Check Total: 309.18 Vendor: 1516 TASC Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False IN963583 3/1/17 - 3/31/17 Admin Fees 95.13 02/14/2017 101-41800-413500 Check Total: 95.13 Vendor: 1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: True 1210623 resale - wine 25.10 02/14/2017 609-49750-425300 1210921 resale - beer 20,028.15 02/14/2017 609-49750-425200 1213957 resale - beer n/a 58.15 02/14/2017 609-49750-425400 156-151 resale - beer credit -64.15 02/14/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 20,047.25 Vendor: 4536 JACOB THUNANDER Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: True 1/19/2017 Mileage Reimbursement (20.2 miles) 10.81 02/14/2017 101-41910-433100 Check Total: 10.81 Vendor: 2614 TITAN MACHINERY Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False 177954 Milling Machine 16" 16,927.00 02/14/2017 703-00000-165010 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 16,927.00 Check Total: Vendor: 2054 TRI STATE SURPLUS COMPANY, INC 28748 CH Copy Rm- (4) New upright; (4) used beam;(i ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 1538 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS CORP 260702 (5.67) Cold Mix Tons #2 Winter 360.20 Check Total: Vendor: 4441 VALLEY PAVING INC Pay Voucher 5 l 00009 - Final Pay Vouch #5 - CSAH 75/TH 25 ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV L: 00064909 Oct - Dec 2016 Cargill Lab Testing 00065260 March 2017 WWTP Operations & Maintenance Check Total: Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA 0172600 Enabled: resale- wine 0172600 12/31/2016 resale- liquor 0172600 freight 114,073.25 Check Total: Vendor: 1568 WEST SHERBURNE TRIBUNE 076363 Health Ad- 1/28/17 ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 2062 WILSON HVAC CO 7658 Service - Freon Leak Air Handler in Locker Roo 61,548.00 02/14/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC 7119264 resale - wine 7119264 freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 16,927.00 Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False 360.20 02/14/2017 101-41310-424100 360.20 Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False 708.75 02/14/2017 101-43120-422400 708.75 Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False 114,073.25 12/31/2016 400-43300-459010 114,073.25 Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False 4,650.42 12/31/2016 602-49480-430800 61,548.00 02/14/2017 602-49480-430800 66,198.42 Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: True 96.00 02/14/2017 609-49750-425300 740.75 02/14/2017 609-49750-425100 20.00 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 856.75 Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False 148.25 02/14/2017 226-45122-433300 148.25 Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False 2,017.00 02/14/2017 226-45126-431990 2,017.00 Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: False 1,245.00 02/14/2017 609-49750-425300 18.72 02/14/2017 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Total for Check Run: 636,593.81 Total of Number of Checks: 88 Date: 2/14/17 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 13 Check Total: 1,263.72 Vendor: 2645 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False 1/26/2017 16C001 -Deed Tax 1.65 02/14/2017 229-45202-453011 Check Total: 1.65 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: True 25 2016 Electio 2016 Election Costs - Primary & General 668.61 12/31/2016 101-41410-431990 February February 2017 Deputies Contract 101,470.00 02/14/2017 101-42100-430500 Check Total: 102,138.61 Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: True 01494-480 53 ZRCFOS - Fallen Overpass Prelim Design Phase 6,012.50 12/31/2016 101-43111-430300 01494-700 42 General WWTP - Dec 2016 252.00 12/31/2016 602-49480-430300 01494-800 36 100009 - CSAH 75/TH 25 Intersection Imp - De 14,728.50 12/31/2016 400-43300-459010 01494-950 28 14C002 PHOSPH - Phosphorus Construction Ad 2,587.00 12/31/2016 602-00000-165010 01494-950 28 14C002 DIGEST - Digester Construction Admin 1,358.50 12/31/2016 602-00000-165010 01627-990 15 15C002 - 95th St NE Extension - Dec 2016 1,659.00 12/31/2016 400-43300-459012 02596-010 24 2016 General Engineering Services Phase 3 - De 2,583.34 12/31/2016 101-43111-430300 02596-010 24 2016 General Engineering Services Phase 3 - De 2,583.33 12/31/2016 601-49440-430300 02596-010 24 2016 General Engineering Services Phase 3 - De 2,583.33 12/31/2016 602-49490-430300 02596-0208 State Aid Network - Dec 2016 130.00 12/31/2016 101-43111-430300 02596-030 15 Maps - Dec 2016 218.00 12/31/2016 101-43111-430300 02596-040 21 GIS Support Services - Dec 2016 454.00 12/31/2016 702-00000-431990 02596-110 18 ZZBCOL MASTER - BCOL Athletic Complex 1,256.00 12/31/2016 229-45202-431990 02596-160 12 15C004 - 7th St/Th 25 Intersection Improve Pha: 4,674.25 12/31/2016 400-43300-459014 02596-3403 2016 - 2017 Market Matching - Dec 2016 700.00 12/31/2016 213-46301-431990 02596-3504 201645 - Camping World Plan Review 73.50 12/31/2016 101-00000-220110 02596-3603 16C003 - 2017 Street Improvements - Dec 2016 31,200.75 12/31/2016 400-43300-459016 Check Total: 73,054.00 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Total for Check Run: 636,593.81 Total of Number of Checks: 88 Date: 2/14/17 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (02/08/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 13 City Council Agenda 2/13/17 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: I . Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #I, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Trent Teicher Climbing Wall MCC 1/20/2017 PT Patrick Doperalski Slide Attendant MCC 1/23/2017 PT Amanda Matthies Facility Lead MCC 1/26/2017 PT Danielle Kinler Childcare MCC 2/6/2017 PT Christy Mariette Childcare MCC 2/9/2017 PT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day Class Sarah Renslow Voluntary MCC 1/3/17 PT Amanda Prodoehl Voluntary MCC 1/3/17 PT Melissa Scales Voluntary Liquor Store 1/14/17 PT Brenda Westphal Voluntary MCC 1/30/17 PT Lloyd VanVleet Involuntary MCC 1/31/17 PT Brian Weldon Voluntary MCC 3/1/17 FT New Hire and Terms City Council 2017: 2/7/2017 City Council Agenda: 2/13/17 2C. Consideration of approving sale or disposal of surplus vroverty (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to declare certain items as surplus property and authorize the sale or disposal of those items. There are various items for review (detailed lists attached). They are the following: 1. Parks Department — Old Otter Creek Park Gazebo and 23 old picnic tables 2. Monticello Community Center — Rubber Flooring, Cattle Mats 3. Public Works — 1999 Dodge Caravan, Honda generator, Diesel generator,Steal Cutting Band Saw and Rubber Tracks from a 430 Case Skid Steere 4. City Hall — Office Cabinets Al. Budget Impact: Varies by the value of the property. A2. Staff Work Load Impact: Depends on the value of the property. Some items will be shopped as salvage; other items may go to auction or sold via formal bids or informal bids. State contracting laws will govern in absence of city policy. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified on the attached lists. 2. Motion to deny the sale or disposal of surplus property as recommended. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends Option 1 to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Parks Surplus Property List B. Parks Photos C. MCC Surplus Property List D. MCC — Photos E. PW Property List F. PW Photos G. City Hall Surplus List H. City Hall Photos 1 City Council Agenda: 2/13/17 Equipment/Supplies Surplus List Department _Parks Date 2-8-17 1. $100,000 + A. B. 2. $50,000 - $100,000 A. B. 3. $25,000.00 - $50,000.00 A. B. 4. $10,000 - $25,000 A. B. C. 5. $2,500 - $10,000 A. B. C. 6. $1,000 - $2,500 A. B. C. 7. $100 - $1,000 A. Old Otter Creek Park Gazebo B. C. 8. $0-$100 A. 23 Old picnic tables B. C. f'. IV-s411e i r� 1 1 Po _ � !. 1 AZ an � WN W rt�l.�e r f 1 - p . �d�uxutsu _.soh r 9 ��in�rna t 41r 'Elul ow 6 i a rtr� W'r Eurl -- En, y z —lit M r two ti �+ WOOMMA c IOmk mr - ■V w Awl , er *� PAW, pawl La b � 1 Equipment/Supplies Surplus List Department 1 v 1ck:� Date 1. $100,000+ A. B. 2. $50,000 - $100,000 A. B. 3. $25,000.00-$50,000.00 A. B. 4. $10,000 - $25,000 A. B. C. 5. $2,500 - $10,000 A. B. C. 6. $1,000-$2,500 A. R�k6t:);e+r -k�lObgZ V\ — co�AAAe Mr,-1� B. O C. 7. $100-$1,000 A. B. C. 8. $0-$100 A. B. C. 1(2311-I a 4 i Equipment/Supplies Surplus List Department _Streets 1. $100,000 + A. B. 2. $50,000 - $100,000 A. B. 3. $25,000.00 - $50,000.00 A. B. 4. $10,000 - $25,000 A. B. C. 5. $2,500 - $10,000 A. B. C. 6. $1,000 - $2,500 A. 1999 Dodge Caravan B. Honda generator C. Diesel generator 7. $100 - $1,000 A. Steal cutting band saw B. Rubber tracks from a 430 Case skid steere C. 8. $0-$100 A. B. C. Date 1-24-17 A40 8 t bps r Wil L c.• 9 wi t r 1 c !. i,4 Equipment/Supplies Surplus List Department: Water and Sewer Utilities 1. $100,000 + A. B. 2. $50,000 - $100,000 A. B. 3. $25,000.00 - $50,000.00 A. B. 4. $10,000 - $25,000 A. B. C. 5. $2,500 - $10,000 A. B. C. 6. $1,000 - $2,500 A. B. C. 7. $100 - $1,000 A. B. C. 8. $0-$100 A. 2 wooden office cabinets (2 tier) B. 1 office cabinet with countertop C. Date: 2/13/2017 City Council Agenda: 02/13/17 2D. Consideration to approve a Therapeutic Massage Enterprise license for Lilv's Massage located at 141 E. Broadwav, Suite 2 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider Therapeutic Massage Enterprise Licenses for Lily's Massage. The license, if approved, will be in effect immediately. Information required for approval consisted of. Application completed by the individual applicant, partnership, or corporation; License fee of $100; completed Background Information and Release Form and fee of $25; a completed Data Practices Advisory Form (Tennessen Warning) and a Certificate of Workers Compensation Insurance and/or Liability Insurance. The application was received and reviewed. All information was received and verified and staff recommends approval pending receiving the names of three references, certificate of workers' compensation insurance and a favorable site inspection based on City Ordinance. If the City Council denies a license they will need to provide findings of fact on the denial. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time was necessary to review the request and prepare this report. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Therapeutic Massage Enterprise License for Lily's Massage located at 141 E. Broadway, Suite 2 pending receipt of references, certificate of worker's compensation, and a favorable inspection. 2. Motion to deny the Therapeutic Massage Enterprise License based on findings of fact to be stated by the City Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Application B. Certificate of Liability Insurance ��T CITY - `� L�Q11�1'r�P _aV, APPLICATION FOR 2016 THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE ENTERPRISE LICENSE Date: / / / q / t r �+ Application is hereby submitted for a Therapeutic Massage Establishment License within the City of Monticello, in accordance with the Ordinance of said City regulating the same. Enclose with the application: • The license fee of $100 + $50 per Massage Therapist (a separate application must be submitted for each therapist) • A completed and signed "background check authorization" form and copy of driver's license • A certificate of workers' comp. insurance or company name & policy # (if applicable) • A certificate of liability insurance L) i 1. FULL Name of Business: L1 L `/ 5 n.5�c��r��, I � 2. Check: Individual Corporation Partnershin Other 3. Address of the Business to be Licensed: M nA+i <P1tr7 A ill f'�'y 4. Legal Description of Premises and Description of the Premises to be Licensed (plan of the area showing dimensions, location of buildings, street access, and parking) and facilities and floor number, street number, and rooms where the massage services are to be conducted. �— SeCfi-�r 'Cwt _ t2 I (ZG,►,�r�v, -n,q D -Io wv'al plG,�- VY1tnM Lce(to Pj1 uoi-- Oc:�, Lt -1 t N..C. w 5. Business Phone Number(s): 6. Minnesota Tax Identification No.: 'IA -/V t � 7. Federal Tax Identification No. lf"b )-5-0 it x-�5- 8. Manager or Owner's FULL Name: V1I %Tog (�i q Last First MI 9. Manager or Owner's Date of Birth: 10. Manager of Owner's Place of Birth: if applicant is different from .Manager/Proprietor. please fill out O 's 10 through 15 11. Applicant's IFull Name: Last First MI 12. Applicant's Phone Number: Cell_ _Home 13. Applicant's Email Address: _ 14. Applicant's Home Address: , -ZVVV�3i9 I M�PTAAV Ifof( 15. Applicant's Date of Birth: / -t 16. Applicant's Place of B rth: 17. Is Applicant, or has Applicant been (known by a name other than the current true legal name, and iff so, what name(s), when, and in what capacity or place was such a name used. Ilc':l" 18. Are ,you a U.S. Citizen or resident alien or has the legal nutharity to work in the United Mates? 19. The name and street address of the business if it is to be conducted under a designation, name, or style other than the name of the applicant, and a certified copy of certificate as required by Minnesota Statues, Section 333.02. 20. Applicant's Position with Company- 21. List the type, name, and location of every business or occupation Applicant his been engaged in diming the preceding five years. 22. Does Applicant have any training or experience in performing massage services, including any certification, degrees, diplomas, or educational coursework. viC. 23. Full blame of Owner of (Premises: �ei,I 24. Address of Owner of (Premises: (If different from applicant): r 25. Owners (Phone Number (➢f different from applicant): 26. Amount of Investment (buildings, fixtures, furniture, etc): 27. If partnership, state names and addresses of all partners. Include a copy of the (Partnership Agreement. 28. if corporation, state names, addresses and birthdates of all officers and directors. Include a copy of the Articles of Incorporation and Secretary' of State's Certificate of Good Standing. Ordinance doesn't require this: No other persons than those named in this application have any interest in the management and control of such business. 29. Description of services to be provided annd of goods, if any, to be sold: NAa s S " , 30. If goods are sold, source of supply: 31. Business Hours of Operation: 0. - U a-wi — �-VyL 32. Other communities where licenses are or have been held: (V V-8, IM-k� VK NJ 33. Has Applicant previously been denied a license to perform massage services, or had a license revoked or suspended, and, if so, the circumstances of such denial, revocation, or suspension. 34. List below as to whether, within the preceding five (5) years, the applicant, and/or owner of the business has been convicted of any crime relating to theft, damage or trespass to property, sale of a controlled substance, or the operation of business; the nature of any such offense and the penalty assessed. 35. The names, residences and/or business addresses of three (3) persons, residents of the State of Minnesota of good moral character, not related to the Applicant or financially interested in the licensee's premises who may be referred as to the Applicant's character, or in the case where information is required of a manager, the manager's character. -ro b e. f%6uet,,� 36. Do you reside in Monticello and have your home as a base for your business: Yes No Y DATA PRACTICESAD VISORY.• The data supplied in this application will be used to assess the qualifications for a license. This data is not legally required but the City will not be able to grant the license without it. If a license is granted, the data will constitute a public record. Seven ISP "ToPeTtea, �'p Zeal, and Ave, MH 5531-6 January 3, 2017 Xuline ®in 2 Dear Ms. Qin- Enclosed herewith please find a copy of the Lease Agreement for Unit Two Broadway Plaza in Monticello Minnesota. I believe everything is self explanatory in the lease. I will be out of town until Thursday evening January 5th My plan is to clear out the unit on Saturday January 7th. Upon a receipt seat of the check for $3000 and a signed copy of the lease you may tale possession and begin your remodeling and improvements. Work is already begun in the hallway behind your unit regarding geeing a new door and painting the hall in the bathroom. r �• .� •' 1.. r i % f 1 a ��ti•`r - •a. r ._ `�> � � . _'M• •_•fes •I .� , s ? x � s+ To verify information, contact ABMP. Tel: 303-674-8478 Fax: 303-674-0859 This Policy is issued by your risk retention group. Your risk retention group may not be subject to all of the insurance laws and regulations of your State. State insurance insolvency guaranty funds are not available for your risk retention group. Coverage is afforded to person(s) named herein as Named Insureds according to the terms and conditions of the Policy to which this Certificate refers. No other rights or conditions, except as specifically stated herein, are granted or inferred. COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICY OF INSURANCE LISTED ABOVE HAS BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED BELOW. THE INSURED ACTIVE DATE LISTED BELOW APPLIES ONLY TO ELEMENTS OF COVERAGE CONTINUOUSLY IN PLACE SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE NAMED INSURED's POLICY. CHANGES TO COVERAGE ARE EFFECTIVE RETROACTIVELY ONLY TO THE DATE THE CHANGE WAS MADE. REPORT IN WRITING WITHIN 48 HOURS ANY & ALL CLAIMS, OR INCIDENTS THAT YOU BELIEVE MAY RESULT IN A CLAIM, EVEN IF GROUNDLESS. This Certificate, along with the Policy to which it refers, is valid evidence of coverage extended to the Certificate Holder listed below. CERTIFICATE HOLDER (Active Registered Members are on file with the ABMP Membership Director) Member/Named Insured: Xuling Qin Membership I.D. #: 770564 Member/Policy Term Active: Feb -15-2017 Member/Policy Term Expires: Feb -14-2018 Total Member Cost: $ 199 (ABMP Membership, including Member Liability Coverage) P� Authorized Representative CANCELLATION: Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will endeavor to mail 10 days written notice for non-payment or 90 days written notice for any other reason to the certificate holder named above, but failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company, its agents or representatives. ADDITIONAL INSURED: (with inception date) Coverage is extended subject to all terns and conditions of the Policy. Certificate of Insurance �abmp OCCURRENCE COVERAGE ABMP In -Dues Liability Program ABMP MAILING ADDRESS: MASTER POLICY HOLDER Associated Bodywork & Massage Professionals Allied Professionals Insurance RPG 25188 Genesee Trail Road Suite 200 AGENT/BROKER Golden, CO 80401 Allied Professionals Insurance Services ISSUED BY: POLICY #: API-ABMP-17 Alled Professionals Insurance Company, A Risk Retention Group, Inc. LIABILITY MMITS (per member) ANNUAL AGGREGATE ............................................... $6,000,000 PER OCCURRENCE LIMIT ........................................... $2,000,000 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMP/OP.................................................. Included PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ........................................ Included GENERAL LIABILITY ............................................... Included FIRE LIABILITY LIMIT ............................................. $100,000 To verify information, contact ABMP. Tel: 303-674-8478 Fax: 303-674-0859 This Policy is issued by your risk retention group. Your risk retention group may not be subject to all of the insurance laws and regulations of your State. State insurance insolvency guaranty funds are not available for your risk retention group. Coverage is afforded to person(s) named herein as Named Insureds according to the terms and conditions of the Policy to which this Certificate refers. No other rights or conditions, except as specifically stated herein, are granted or inferred. COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICY OF INSURANCE LISTED ABOVE HAS BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED BELOW. THE INSURED ACTIVE DATE LISTED BELOW APPLIES ONLY TO ELEMENTS OF COVERAGE CONTINUOUSLY IN PLACE SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE NAMED INSURED's POLICY. CHANGES TO COVERAGE ARE EFFECTIVE RETROACTIVELY ONLY TO THE DATE THE CHANGE WAS MADE. REPORT IN WRITING WITHIN 48 HOURS ANY & ALL CLAIMS, OR INCIDENTS THAT YOU BELIEVE MAY RESULT IN A CLAIM, EVEN IF GROUNDLESS. This Certificate, along with the Policy to which it refers, is valid evidence of coverage extended to the Certificate Holder listed below. CERTIFICATE HOLDER (Active Registered Members are on file with the ABMP Membership Director) Member/Named Insured: Xuling Qin Membership I.D. #: 770564 Member/Policy Term Active: Feb -15-2017 Member/Policy Term Expires: Feb -14-2018 Total Member Cost: $ 199 (ABMP Membership, including Member Liability Coverage) P� Authorized Representative CANCELLATION: Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will endeavor to mail 10 days written notice for non-payment or 90 days written notice for any other reason to the certificate holder named above, but failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company, its agents or representatives. ADDITIONAL INSURED: (with inception date) Coverage is extended subject to all terns and conditions of the Policy. City Council Agenda: 02/13/17 2E. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for the March Madness 5K being held on March 18, 2017, sponsored by Monticello High School Track/CC Booster Club QS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approving the Special Event Permit for the March Madness 5k, including waiving of the $50 permit fee and the use of the Community Center in exchange for sponsorship. A narrative has been provided by the applicant. This event has existed for a few years with the Community Center acting as an organizing partner. This year Community Center staff is not involved in the planning of the event, however, they are willing to allow the use of the Community Center as a sponsor. A site map illustrating the proposed configuration of the designated route is included in the supporting data. The organizers have been in contact with Public Works and are using cones provided by the department. The Sheriff's Office has been notified of the event. In addition, the applicant has provided a certificate of insurance for the event with the City named as additional insured. Al. Budget Impact: The permit application waiver of fee impact is $50.00. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve waiving the fee for the Special Event Permit. 2. Motion to deny waiving the fee for the Special Event Permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 above. It has been the Council's practice to waive this fee for non -profits or for charity events. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Application & Narrative B. Map Image showing proposed routing C. Certificate of Liability Insurance CITY OF MONTICELLO --~� - Community Development -� Special Event Permit 505 Walnut Street, shite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 monticelto (763) 295-2711 . info(Uci.monticello.mn.us Application Checklist PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address I Property Legal Description I Property ID Number PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION I Owner Name I Owner Address I Owner Phone I Owner Email APPLIC T INFORMATION I Applicant Name c, tre 144' Applicant Address - Applicant Phone Applicant Email _ ,,,, I J , C,l) �+ Name of Event M Lc Location/Address of Event 11'► �,, f ,`L f f/� 1,a,—/1, v». 1�✓ •-r7�C� Dates & Times of Event /L►c,tc 4 /i� 2-a17 723® to: Yz)I A✓ Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 1 Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) (Date) Applicant's Statement This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. 7 (Signature) p�/�,�'a' (Date) f�' ✓ C� CITY APPROVAL (City Clerk Signature) (Date) (Community Development Director Signature) (Date) Special Event Permit Approved ❑ Denied ❑ Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Admin I Parks I Streets Director 07/25/16 4 Event description for March Madness 5K Saturday March 18, 2017 This event has been an ongoing event that is 5+ yrs. in the running. In the past, the Community Center has been a partner which has negated the need for a permit. This year, the HS Track/CC Booster Club will be taking over the event exclusively but no other changes will be made to the event or its operations from what has occurred in past years. The event will still use the Community Center (Mississippi Room) for registration and post race gathering in exchange for "sponsorship" recognition. This has already been discussed with Community Center staff. Community Center parking lot is more than adequate for anticipated participants and will not interfere with any other Community Center business. The run occurs at 9:30 AM and participants will typically be on site in the hr. preceding the event and also approx. 1 hr after the event (8:30-10:30). The map details the course route. It is run on the side/shoulders of the street/road. We will have a lead bike to help alert any vehicle traffic to coming runners. Cones will also be used to mark the course and separate runners from vehicles where possible. Approx. 12 traffic cones will be reserved from Public Works like has been done in the past. We will have a person at the intersection of Elm and Golf Course Rd. to also assist with traffic at that intersection. There will also be temporary signs along the course, "Caution Runners On The Road", to alert vehicle traffic. I would request that the application fee be waived as this is a fundraiser for the High School track team. Please contact me if additional information is needed. Dave Wik djjpwik@gmail.com 295-4053 (h) 763-244-6678 (c) Malawi,_ Sri •; '1� � � �, . • '1 r t *94 t MinnP'al�st� r ` �A/P 41 F4°fast EV,S,St A/P St i 1 40 ALCOR" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCEI D1/17/2o17Y) THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the J certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). J PRODUCER CONTACT (NAME: Debbie Bledsoe l Apollo Insurance Agency I PHONE Ext): (763) 314-0400 I FAX A/C. No): (855)927-6655 611 Walnut Street IAADDRESS:debbieb@apolloinsurance.com Suite 1 I INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIL# Monticello MN 55362 INSURERA:Continental Western Group 10804 INSURED INSURER 8 Dakota Truck Underwriters Monticello Public Schools IINSURERC: 302 Washington Street I INSURER D : Ij INSURER E: Monticello MN 55362 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:Master 16/17 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSRTYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP I LTR INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYYI (MM/DD/YYYYfl LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 1,000,000 EACH OCCURRENCE $ ACLAIMS-MADE Fx� OCCUR DAMAGE TO RENTED 300,000 PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ SCP298607023 7/1/2016 7/1/2017 I M ED EXP (Any one person) $ 15,000 PERSONAL &ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000 000 , 000 POLICY ❑PRO- ❑LOC li I PRODUCTS -COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,' , 000 , JECT OTHER: Employee Benefits $ 1,000,000 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COaaBINEDtSINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 A X ANY AUTO I BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNEDSCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS scP298/607023 7 1/2016 7/1/2017 BODILY INJURY Per accident) $ _ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE AUTOS (Per accident) $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/ LOCATIONS /VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) 5K Run event CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Monticello THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 505 Walnut St ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Monticello, MN 55362 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE T Velishek, CIC/APOJP ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INS025 (901401) $ UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE 1 $ 2,000,000 A X EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE I AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 DED I X IRETENTION$ 0 SCP298607023 7/1/2016 7/1/2017 $ WORKERS COMPENSATION PR OH X I STATUTE I I AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ER ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE I E. L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 500,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N7 N / A B (Mandatoryin NH) WC01000073792015A 7/1/2016 7/1/2017 I If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 500,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/ LOCATIONS /VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) 5K Run event CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Monticello THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 505 Walnut St ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Monticello, MN 55362 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE T Velishek, CIC/APOJP ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INS025 (901401) City Council Agenda: 02/13/17 2F. Consideration of approving an application for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be conducted by the Wright Countv Ducks Unlimited, Chapter 39, in conjunction with their Annual Banquet on Mav 1, 2017 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Wright County Ducks Unlimited has applied for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be held on May 1, 2017 in conjunction with their 32nd Annual Membership Banquet. The event is being held at the River City Extreme. To receive a permit from the State, the City must approve the application. In the past the City has not opposed these exempt gambling license applications for charitable events. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the application for a charitable gambling permit for a raffle conducted by the Wright County Ducks Unlimited Chapter 39 on May 1, 2017 for their annual membership banquet at River City Extreme, 3875 School Blvd. 2. Motion to not approve the application for a charitable gambling permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports Alternative #1 and requests Council to approve the application which will be submitted to the State Gambling Control Board. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Copy of Application for Exempt Gambling Permit MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING LG220 Application for Exempt Permit An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that: conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be $1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to your county by calling 651-539-1900. ORGANIZATION INFORMATION 5/15 Page 1 of 2 Application Fee (non-refundable) Applications are processed in the order received. If the application is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite service, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted. Organization1 % LG220 Application for Exempt Permit 5/15 Page 2 of 2 LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT (required before submitting application to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board) CITY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located within city limits The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30 -day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days (60 days for a 1st class city). The application is denied. Print City Name: Signature of City Personnel: Title: Date: The city or county must sign before submitting application to the Gambling Control Board. COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located in a township The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30 -day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days. The application is denied. Print County Name: Signature of County Personnel: Title: Date: TOWNSHIP (if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.213.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE (required) The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to tbe l3oard within 30 da the event date. (� - 7 Chief Executive Officer's Signature: �� Date: ;)1 / ((Signature/.must be CEO's signature; designee may not sign) Print Name: 1• 1 d l �� 1 K l 13 t1 -e C REQUIREMENTS Complete a separate application for: • all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days, or • all gambling conducted on one day. Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are conducted on the same day. Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the gambling activity is done: A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control Board. Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for 3-1/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). Data privacy notice: The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your organization's qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. Your organization has the right to refuse to supply the information; however, if your organization refuses to supply this information, the Board may not be able to determine your organization's qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. If your organization supplies the information requested, the Board will be able to process the MAIL APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS Mail application with: a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and application fee (non-refundable). If the application is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. Make check payable to State of Minnesota. To: Gambling Control Board 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South Roseville, MN 55113 Questions? Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 651-539-1900. application. Your organization's name and address will be public information when received by the Board. All other information provided will be private data about your organization until the Board issues the permit. When the Board issues the permit, all information provided will become public. If the Board does not issue a permit, all information provided remains private, with the exception of your organization's name and address which will remain public. Private data about your organization are available to Board members, Board staff whose work requires access to the information; Minnesota's Depart- ment of Public Safety; Attorney General; Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota Management & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative Auditor, national and international gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other individuals and agencies specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this notice was given; and anyone with your written consent. This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request. City Council Agenda: 2/13/17 2G. Consideration of appointing Michael Mossev as Monticello Fire Chief as recommended by fire department personnel and appointing him as a representative to the Fire Relief Board of Trustees. (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the Fire Department's Annual Meeting and Election held in January fire department personnel voted and selected Michael Mossey to serve as Monticello's Fire Chief for a term of two years. Mossey has been with the Monticello Fire Department since August 2008. During his time with the fire department Mossey has served as Lieutenant (2014) and most recently as Captain (2015-2016). Mossey is self-employed and currently resides in Monticello. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve appointing Michael Mossey as Monticello Fire Chief as recommended by fire department personnel and appointing him as a representative to the Fire Relief Board of Trustees. 2. Motion consider alternate candidates for the position of Monticello Fire Chief. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • Staff recommends Alternative #1. City Council Agenda: 02/13/17 2H. Consideration of authorizing Citv Staff to explore the transition of Citv Council Agendas and other items to a Paperless Solution QS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider authorizing City staff to explore the transition of City Council agendas and other items to a paperless solution. As technology advances, a paperless agenda is becoming a reality. In an effort to improve efficiency and communication we would like to explore the costs and issues involved in a paperless agenda. It is thought that the transition would allow for some cost savings of printing/copying, but the efficiencies most significant are the need for less staff time and less paper used. If authorized, staff will bring back information on devices, costs, training, uses, etc. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Research time. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize City Staff to explore the transition of City Council agendas and other items to a paperless solution. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • None. City Council Agenda — 02/13/17 2I. Consideration to approve appointment to the Industrial/Economic Development Committee (IEDC) (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Per the IEDC's Organizational and Membership Guidelines, members approved for appointment to the IEDC are to be ratified by the City Council. Recently, Mari Lou McCormic, RiverWood Bank, indicated that she wanted to step away from the IEDC to devote more of her time to be involved on a Chamber of Commerce Committee. She also suggested a replacement person for her IEDC position as well. That person is Kevin Steffensmeier, the new President at RiverWood Bank. At the February 7, 2017 meeting, the IEDC passed a motion recommending that Council accept Mari Lou's resignation and appoint Kevin Steffensmeier as a new member of the IEDC. Al. STAFF IMPACT: There is minimal staff impact in considering approving the appointment of Mr. Steffensmeier as a replacement member on the IEDC in the spot formerly held by Ms. McCormic. The staff time consists of researching the IEDC Organizational and Membership Guidelines and preparing the reports for the IEDC review and action as well as City Council ratification. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: There is no budgetary impact from the consideration of appointing Kevin Steffensmeier to the IEDC. The membership will remain at its active level of 14 participants with his appointment. The IEDC members do not receive a meeting stipend at this time. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the appointment of Kevin Steffensmeier, RiverWood Bank, to the IEDC. 2. Motion to table or deny approving the appointment of Kevin Steffensmeier, RiverWood Bank, to the IEDC C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the appointment of Kevin Steffensmeier, RiverWood Bank, to the IEDC maintaining the membership roster at 14. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. IEDC Organizational and Membership Guidelines (see Section VII) B. Email from Mari Lou McCormic suggesting Kevin Steffensmeier, RiverWood Bank, be appointed to IEDC C. Email from Kevin Steffensmeier, RiverWood Bank, expressing interest in IEDC MON'TICELLO INDUSTRIAL & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (IEDC) ORGANIZATIONAL AND MEMBERSHIP GUIDELINES L Meetim4 Time and Place: Regular meetings are held the first Tuesday of each month at 7:00 a.m. at the Monticello Community Center. Special meetings may be called by the Chair. II. Mission Statement and Obiectives: As written and adopted by the Monticello IEDC in the Annual Action Statement. III. Committee Size: While there is no set or definite size established, it is generally understood that the committee will not exceed 16-18 members. IV. Make-up of the Committee:, Committee members must either work or reside in the community of greater Monticello. Individuals who are involved in an occupation or profession that provides services to the community of Monticello but is not headquartered within the community may also serve as members of the committee. Standing Committee Members: The City Council shall appoint the Mayor and a Council Member to the IEDC as non-voting members. The Board of Directors of the Monticello Chamber of Commerce & Industry shall appoint a voting member to the IEDC. These members shall be considered in committee size. Citv Staff Members: Non-voting Administrator of the City of Monticello Economic Development Manager of the City of Monticello (serves as the EDA Executive Director) Community Development Director of the City of Monticello (in the absence of the Economic Development Manager) V. Officers: The Chair, the Vice Chair, and the Secretary shall be appointed annually at the January meeting. Length of office term shall not exceed three consecutive years. Minutes of each meeting are the responsibility of the Secretary. Committee correspondence is the responsibility of the Economic Development Manager. VI. Length of Membership Terre: Members shall serve for three year teras on a tluee year rotating basis so that approximately one-third of the membership expires each year. Individuals wishing to continue serving on the committee may so indicate prior to the expiration of their term. Any member wishing to relinquish his/her position on the IEDC may do so by submitting a letter of resignation. 2016IEDCORG&GUIDELINES IEDC ORGANIZATIONAL/MEMBERSHIP GUIDELINES PAGE 2 VII. Fillin4 a Vacant Position: A list of potential committee members shall be kept by the Executive Director. The IEDC must recommend approval of new members by a majority vote. The City Council must ratify the appointment of new members to the IEDC. VIII. Membership Attendance: In order to make a positive contribution to the committee, each member is expected to attend at least 75% of the meetings in any given year. A year is defined as beginning on the 1 st of January and ending the 31 th of December. Amended: 01/05/16 20161EDCORG&GUDELINES Jim Thares From: Mari Lou McCormic , Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 2:52 PM To: Cc: Jim Thares Subject: IEDC opportunity Hello Steve, Thank you for the personal visit this week to discuss with me the possibility of serving on the IEDC as Vice -Chair. As you may have observed, I do have a habit of raising my hand to volunteer when opportunities are presented, and my first instinct was to accept. However, after careful consideration I am replying back with an alternative to consider. Perhaps it will serve the committee better by replacing my membership in the IEDC with our President, Kevin Steffensmeier. He is a commercial lender and therefore better equipped professionally to offer more value, tools and insights to the group. I have a meeting on Monday afternoon, and suspect my role with the Chamber Ambassador team will likely take on a greater capacity again this year. So stepping back from IEDC will allow me to focus more time/attention again to Chamber matters, but will also create an opportunity for Kevin to become immersed in the business community at a level where he can truly contribute. Please know how much I appreciate your confidence in me, and am humbled that you felt me worthy of such a position. But it is far more important to me to see the right people doing the right jobs, the ones they are best suited for so that we can all contribute to the best of our abilities for the business community. I welcome your feedback, Mari Lou McCormic Wmxwom &11rr,Bankjr� " Aral solution, This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Jim Thares From: Kevin Steffensmeier Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 10:45 AM To: Thares Cc: Mari Lou McCormic Subject: IEDC Good morning everyone, Mari Lou discussed the IEDC with me last week and the opportunity to become a member. I am very interested in becoming an IEDC member and I believe my experience in banking and commercial lending would be an asset to the group. Thank you for your consideration and have a nice day. Sincerely, Kevin Steffensmeier President RiverWood Bank This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. City Council Agenda: 2/13/17 2J. Consideration to approve purchase of FiberNet video equipment for a total cost of $41,353.20 (Arvig) City Council is asked to approve the capital purchase of video equipment from Inca Networks for a total cost of $41,353.20. The equipment cost was included in the capital budget submitted to City Council, although the budgeted amount was $40,000. Per the City's purchasing policy, City Council must provide final approval for the purchase. The equipment is needed for the headend in order to provide video service. In preparation for the purchase Arvig solicited quotes from two vendors. I apologize the Inca invoice is above my $40,000 estimate. The quote from Harmonic Inc. was substantially higher for this equipment. In Arvig's opinion Inca is a more desirable vendor for service after the sale also. A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Al. Budget Impact: The cost of the purchase is $41, 353.20. The expenditure was included in the capital budget approved by City Council at $40,000. A2. Staff Workload Impact: There is no workload impact. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve purchase of video equipment for a total cost of $41,353.20. 2. Motion to deny purchase of video equipment for a total cost of $41,353.20. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Capital Budget Subscriber Projections: List of Expenses in Fixed Fee: Labor - Support Benefits - Support Gen Operating Supplies Professional Services - Audit Legal Fees Management Services (GM) Professional Services - Billing Regulatory Professional Services Miscellaneous Prof Services Telephone/Internet Internal IT Services Mail & Delivery Cable/Network Services Training/Conferences Marketing LPV Insurance Office Lease Repair & Maint - Buildings Building/Room Rental Write Offs Dues Membership & Subscrip Licenses and Permits Bank Charges Labor - Field Benefits - Field Clothing Supplies Motor Fuels Fiber/Video/Phone Supplies Gen Operating Supplies Landscaping Materials Misc Repair and Maint Supplies Small Tools Maintenance & Support Services Miscellaneous Prof Services Gopher State Locates Travel Expense Training/Conferences Electric Water/Sewer Refuse/Recycling Services Repair & Maint - Buildings/Systems Repair & Maint - Mach & Equip Repair & Maint - Vehicles Vehicle lease expense Miscellaneous Other Exp 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Voice Subscribers 620 632 677 690 690 Video Subscribers 745 820 860 886 913 Internet Subscribers 1,542 1,619 1,781 1,870 1,964 Total Customer Count 1,725 1,811 1,938 2,035 2,137 Five Year List of Capital Expenses: PICO Head End Unit - Analog 29,500 Equip for Arvig HE - Add'I Channels 40,000 27,650 Drops - Plowing 1,790 44,750 35,800 44,750 44,750 STBs 1,400 26,250 14,000 9,100 9,450 GigCenters 1,000 19,250 40,500 22,250 23,500 Accedian NIDs 1,310 9,500 5,425 8,600 10,000 Mapcom - Plant Records 95,000 Microsoft Mediaroom Transition 37,500 37,500 55,038 55,821 TOTAL - Yearly $ 75,000 $ 259,899 $ 133,224 $ 139,738 $ 143,521 List of Expenses in Fixed Fee: Labor - Support Benefits - Support Gen Operating Supplies Professional Services - Audit Legal Fees Management Services (GM) Professional Services - Billing Regulatory Professional Services Miscellaneous Prof Services Telephone/Internet Internal IT Services Mail & Delivery Cable/Network Services Training/Conferences Marketing LPV Insurance Office Lease Repair & Maint - Buildings Building/Room Rental Write Offs Dues Membership & Subscrip Licenses and Permits Bank Charges Labor - Field Benefits - Field Clothing Supplies Motor Fuels Fiber/Video/Phone Supplies Gen Operating Supplies Landscaping Materials Misc Repair and Maint Supplies Small Tools Maintenance & Support Services Miscellaneous Prof Services Gopher State Locates Travel Expense Training/Conferences Electric Water/Sewer Refuse/Recycling Services Repair & Maint - Buildings/Systems Repair & Maint - Mach & Equip Repair & Maint - Vehicles Vehicle lease expense Miscellaneous Other Exp City Council Agenda: 2/13/2017 2K. Consideration of approving the 2017 Wright Countv Annual Highwav Maintenance Agreement (TM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The annual maintenance agreement with Wright County for snow and ice control and first time spring sweeping is up for renewal. Areas for this maintenance agreement are unchanged from last year precluding compensation. This snow and ice control agreement covers expenses at 100% for portions of CSAH 75 running from Willow Street east to the intersection of CSAH 18, and a short section of CR 117, approximately two-tenths of a mile long running north from 85th Avenue. Snow and ice control on a portion of CSAH 39 West from the City Public Works Facility to the junction of CSAH 75 (Broadway) is estimated at 25% of the maintenance and the sweeping is a one-time fee for spring sweeping. The agreement rates are based on average annual costs for the years 2013 to 2015, plus $500/mile for four -lane portions. The increase from the 2016 to the 2017 maintenance contract is $1,406.74. Al. Budget Impact: The total payment from Wright County this year for the Annual Highway Maintenance Agreement amounts to $29,778.46. This payment is made to the City in December of the contracted year. Additional expenses are budgeted in "Snow and Ice". A2. Staff Workload Impact: There is little impact on staff workload due to no changes in this contract. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the 2017 Maintenance Agreement with Wright County as enclosed with total compensation payable to the City in December 2017, in the amount of $29,778.46. 2. Motion to deny the new agreement with the County for annual maintenance of snow and ice removal and sweeping. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends the City Council approve the 2017 Maintenance Agreement with Wright County as outlined in Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: 0 Copy of the 2017 Wright County Highway Maintenance Agreement. JNT Y OA UO�Z � Z = m O X866 January 12, 2017 WRIGHT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite #1 Monticello, MN 55362 Wright County Public Works Building 3600 Braddock Avenue NE Bt4ffalo, MN 55313 One-Hajf'Mile North of C.R. 138 Telephone: (763) 682-7383 FAR: (763) 682-7313 Re: 2017 Maintenance Agreement Dear Mr. O'Neill: VIRGHL, HAWKINS, P.E. Highway Engineer CHAD HAUSMANN, P.E. Assistant Highway Engineer STEVE MEYER Maintenance Superintendent JEREMY CARLSON Right -of -Way Agent It is once again time to renew our annual municipal agreement for the maintenance activities on the road(s) listed on the enclosed agreement. Wright County will continue to use the same method for computing the reimbursement for these maintenance agreements with Wright County cities. Beginning with the 2001 agreements, we based the reimbursement on the average municipal maintenance costs for the previous three years. Before that, we had based the reimbursement on cost history for only one year. This change minimizes the variability in costs from year to year which can occur, particularly for snow/ice control. The estimated total cost on the attached agreement is based on the average of the years 2013, 2014, and 2015 (since 2016 costs are not compiled yet). Please note that the actual payment for this 2017 agreement will be based on the average costs for the years 2014, 2015, and 2016. I have enclosed two copies of the 2017 agreement for your review and approval by the City Council. Please return both copies of the executed aareement.. After approval by the County Board, one of the copies will be returned to you for your files. A check reimbursing your city for the maintenance activities covered under our 2016 agreement will be sent out soon. If you have any questions concerning this, or if you note any discrepancies, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, Virgil Hawkins County Highway Engineer Enclosed: (2) Two 2017 Maintenance Contracts (Revised) MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - 2017 THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the City of Monticello hereinafter referred to as the "City" and the County of Wright hereinafter referred to as the "County". WHEREAS, Chapter 162, Minnesota Statutes, permits the County to designate certain roads and streets within the City as County State Aid Highways, and WHEREAS, the City has concurred in the designation of the County State Aid Highway within its limits as identified in County Board's resolutions of August 28, October 8, November 5, December 3, December 27,1957 and January 7, 1958, and WHEREAS, it is deemed to the best interest of all parties that the duties and responsibilities of both the City and the County as to maintenance on said County State Aid Highways to be clearly defined, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED with regard to said County State Aid Highway maintenance: That the City will be responsible for routine maintenance on the following highways. TOC" PLAN ROAD SEGMENT MILES COST/MI.* TOTAL COST* E. ALL (See CSAH 75, 39, CR 117) 5.75 mi Lump Sum $ 2,369.91 C. CSAH 75 Willow St. to CSAH 39 5.25 4,985.29 26,172.77 (Includes four lane portion plus tumlanes.) D. CSAH 39 From City Public Works Bldg. to 0.32 1,338.84 428.43 W. Jct. of CSAH 75 C. CR 117 From a point 930 feet north of 851 NE 0.18 4,485.29 807.35 To 85's Street NE ESTIMATED TOTAL = 5.75 $ 29,778.46 That routine maintenance shall consist of the following: (Maint. Plan) C. Snow and ice control. D. 25% snow and ice control. E. Sweeping *Based on average annual costs of years 2013, 2014, and 2015, plus $500/mile for four -lane portion (snow/ice control only). That when the City deems it desirable to remove snow by hauling, it shall do so as its own expense. The City shall also be responsible for all snow and ice removal on sidewalks and other boulevard related maintenance outside the curb or street area. That the County will be responsible for all other maintenance. That the City shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the County and all of its agents and employees of any form against any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of whatever nature or character arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the work provided for herein to be performed by the City. It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of the City and all other employees of the City engaged in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall be considered employees of the City only and not of the County; and that any and all claims that may or might arise under Workmen's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said City employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be (Sheet 1 of 2) rendered herein shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the City e That the County shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the City and all of its agents and employees of any form against any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of actions of whatever nature or character, whether at law or equity, arising out of or by reason of the execution, omission or performance of the work provided for herein to be performed by the County including, but not limited to, claims made arising out of maintenance obligations of County, engineering, design, taking or inverse condemnation proceedings. It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of the County and all other employees of the County engaged in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall be considered employees of the County only and not of the City; and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workmen's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said County employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the County. That in December of 2017 , the City shall receive payment from the County for their work. This amount shall be based on the average annual cost per mile for the years 2014, 2015, and 2016 for routine maintenance on Municipal County State Aid Highways. The average annual cost per mile will reflect only those costs associated with the areas of routine maintenance for which the City is responsible. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this _ day of .20 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council of said City on .20—. City Clerk APPROVED AND ACCEPTED: COUNTY OF WRIGHT Name of City Chairman of the Board Date ATTEST: County Coordinator Date (Sheet 2 of 2) City Council Agenda: 02/13/2017 2L. Consideration of authorizing Purchase of a 2017 Tvmco 600 street sweeper with a 2017 Navistar 4300 International Chasses through the Capital Equipment Fund at the $165,615 state contract price Per the noted specifications. (TM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Council is asked to consider authorizing the replacement of a 2008 Tymco 600 sweeper/ International truck with a 2017 Tymco 600 street sweeper mounted on a 2017 Navistar 4300 International chassis from Environmental Equipment and Services of Elko, MN. This company is listed on the Minnesota State contract purchasing agreement. In the best interest of the residents of the City of Monticello, the Public Works Department assumes the basic responsibility for sweeping public streets, which is a total of approximately 68 miles. Reasonable sweeping is necessary for vehicle and pedestrian safety, water quality and environmental concerns. The City is mandated by the State of Minnesota to complete two rounds of street sweeping of the entire city per year to stay in compliance with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program. Our sweeping operations begin in the spring as soon as the streets are clear of snow and ice. Spring sweeping is designed to pick up the bulk of aggregate left behind from winter sanding operations. It normally this takes six to eight weeks to make a complete round of the City. Once spring sweeping has been completed, the next phase is the general maintenance sweeping program which consists of prioritizing sensitive areas of the City based on the street function, traffic volume, impact on water quality and environment, and the welfare of the citizens in the community. Also, taken into consideration is the City's Storm Water Management Plan. The third and final phase of the sweeping program is fall clean up. This typically begins in October and continues through November. The most sensitive areas of the community are the ones established prior to 1975. Most of the storm water from these portions of the City runs directly from the catch basins in the street to the Mississippi River. It is very important to contain any contaminates such as grass clippings, leaves, dirt, glass, aluminum, paper, salt, and sand, just to name a few of the many things a sweeper will pick up. Since the mid 1970's, the new subdivisions have been constructed with storm water runoff ponding systems. The infrastructure of these systems includes approximately 15 mitigated wetlands, 34 dry detention basins, 50 infiltration basins, 4 storm water treatment devices, 25 sump manholes, 16 water quality basins, 36 wet retention basins and hundreds of street catch basins. If the streets are not properly swept, all of the debris mentioned above will end up in the water basins and potentially the Mississippi River, which is the eventual destination of Monticello's storm water. In 2008, the Street Department purchased a Tymco 600 regenerative air system sweeper. This sweeper uses a high -efficiency multi -pass, cylindrical, centrifugal dust separator to clean the air before it passes to the blower coupled with a controlled jet of air directed 1 City Council Agenda: 02/13/2017 through a blast orifice to dislodge debris from the paved surface of the road. The concentrated high velocity air is blasted into cracks and crevices removing all different sizes of debris from the fine dust particles to large debris such as trash, leaves, rocks and dirt. All debris removed from the paved surface is directed up the heavy-duty suction hose into the large hopper. In layman terms, it is basically a large vacuum cleaner mounted on a truck. When the department purchased this sweeper, the intention was to sweep streets, gutter lines, catch basins, and to also use it for picking up asphalt chips from milling operations in street repairs. The sweeper worked great for picking up asphalt chips but after doing this for seven years, it became apparent that it took a big toll on the sweeper and wore the metal vacuum portion to the point of replacement. The main fan blade has been replaced twice. In 2016, the department purchased a pick-up broom for the front of the skid loader to pick up the larger millings and to use the sweeper just for the final sweeping but, unfortunately, the vacuum portion of this unit needs to be replaced. The sweeper/vacuum portion on a new sweeper will now be made out of stainless steel which is a much harder steel and, therefore, will extend the life of the sweeper. With proper operation, the sweeper should last at least 15 years. We received a bid from Environmental Equipment of Elko, MN for replacing the Tymco 600 sweeper on the existing 2008 International truck at a cost of $180,615. We also received a bid from the same company for a complete package, including the Tymco 600 sweeper mounted on a new 2017 Navistar 4300 at a cost of $240,615. This sweeper is on the state contract purchasing agreement. Environmental Equipment has offered the City $75,000 for a trade-in on our current sweeper, reducing the price to $165,615 for the complete package. Included in the purchase of a new sweeper is the opportunity to send four employees to the factory in Waco Texas for four days of training, which will include operation training, maintenance training and how the sweepers are built. While in Texas, the employees will receive eight hours of pay per day, otherwise all other cost will be paid by Tymco, Inc. Al. Budget Impact: The street sweeper is $165,615 with trade-in. The purchase will be financed by the Central Equipment Fund. The Central Equipment Fund is an internal service fund that provides financing for governmental fund (General Fund) capital equipment purchases of $10,000 or more. The Central Equipment Fund recovers equipment costs with annual lease payments from the benefitting department. The annual recovery for this purchase is $20,500. The sweeper was budgeted for 2017 at $190,000. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff workload impact of this new unit will be very positive due to improved efficiencies and less down time with a sweeper well suited for Public Works. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve sweeper specifications and authorize the purchase of a 2017 2 City Council Agenda: 02/13/2017 Tymco 600 mounted on a 2017 Navistar 4300 International truck from Environmental Equipment and Services Inc. of Elko, MN for $240,615, less $75,000, for the trade-in value of the 2008 Tymco 600, for a total cost of $165,615. This includes the opportunity for four Public Works employees to attend the Tymco plant and training center in Waco, Texas. 2. Motion to have a new Tymco 600 vacuum sweeper mounted on the existing sweeper at a price of $180,615.00. 3. Motion to deny the sweeper replacement at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends the City Council approve the replacement of the 2008 Tymco sweeper with a new 2017 Tymco 600 mounted on a 2017 Navistar 4300 International truck and authorize sending four employees to the Tymco training facility in Waco, Texas as outlined in Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Copy of state contract pricing for the new Tymco 600/Navistar International B. Photo of the 2008 sweeper and the new 2017 sweeper A%Lnvimnmental uipment ari jervices, Inc - 27365 Zachary Avenue • Elko, MN 55020 Toll Free 1-877461-3650.Office 952461-3650 • Fax 952461-3689 January 23, 2017 Tom Moores City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Tom, Thank you for the opportunity to quote a new Tymco 600 mounted on an International Chassis. The Minnesota State contract number is S-843(5), 6103152. Base Price $198,750.00 Air Horn $250.00 Electric Heated West Coast Mirrors Standard 12" Parabolic Mirrors Standard 2 Cameras, Color Monitor $2,450.00 Cloth High Back Air Ride Seats Standard AM/FM/CD Standard Abrasion Protection Package Standard Automatic Sweep Interrupt (ASI) $1,700.00 Auxiliary Hand Hose $1,500.00 Auxiliary Hydraulic System $1.400.00 Gutter Broom Tilt Adjuster (Left & Right) $2,800.00 Reverse Pick -Up Head System $550.00 Stainless Steel Hopper $19,500.00 Stainless Steel Blower Housing $2,150.00 Gutter Broom Override (Left & Right) $2,800.00 Left & Right Inspection Door (No Steps Needed) Standard Hydraulic Curtain Lifter System $1,400.00 Air Dryer Brakes $900.00 LED Light Bar $1,050.00 Arrow Board LED $1,050.00 Hopper Deluge System $850.00 Hopper Drain System $650.00 High Output Water System $865.00 Base Price includes Factory Training for 4 people at Tymco in Waco, TX Standard $240,615.00 Less Trade-in of Tymco 600: -75.000.00 Price: $165,615.00 Broom Assist Pick-up Head (Optional) $4,500.00 The City of Monticello is responsible for 6.5 % Motor Vehicle Sales Tax, Titling, Transit, & Registration Fees. SincWWalford, Alan Vice President JjLnvironmentai uipment a �erv,ces- Inc. 27365 Zachary Avenue • Elko, MN 55020 Toll Free 1-877-461-3650.Office 952461-3650 • Fax 952461-3689 January 23, 2017 Tom Moores City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Tom, Thank you for the opportunity to quote a new Tymco 600 mounted on your current chassis. The Minnesota State contract number is S-843(5), 4103152. Base Price $198,750.00 Air Horn $250.00 Electric Heated West Coast Mirrors Standard 12" Parabolic Mirrors Standard 2 Cameras, Color Monitor $2,450.00 Cloth High Back Air Ride Seats Standard AM/FM/CD Standard Abrasion Protection Package Standard Automatic Sweep Interrupt (ASI) $1,700.00 Auxiliary Hand Hose $1,500.00 Auxiliary Hydraulic System $1.400.00 Gutter Broom Tilt Adjuster (Left & Right) $2,800.00 Reverse Pick -Up Head System $550.00 Stainless Steel Hopper $19,500.00 Stainless Steel Blower Housing $2,150.00 Gutter Broom Override (Left & Right) $2,800.00 Left & Right Inspection Door (No Steps Needed) Standard Hydraulic Curtain Lifter System $1,400.00 Air Dryer Brakes $900.00 LED Light Bar $1,050.00 Arrow Board LED $1,050.00 Hopper Deluge System $850.00 Hopper Drain System $650.00 High Output Water System $865.00 Base Price includes Factory Training for 4 people at Tymco in Waco, TX Standard $240,615.00 Less Trade-in of Tymco 600: -60.000.00 Price: $180,615.00 Broom Assist Pick-up Head (Optional) $4,500.00 The City of Monticello is responsible for 6.5 % Motor Vehicle Sales Tax, Titling, Transit, & Registration Fees, Sincerely, Alan D. WaRVIcesident L + _ •a y t + -L, -LL. 600 I AdippL 1 INS .ter. ♦ N amu. City Council Agenda - 02/13/17 2M. Consideration of approving Ordinance No. 660 adopting the 2017 Citv of Monticello Official Zoning Map. (AS) A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND The City Council is asked to adopt the proposed City of Monticello 2017 Official Zoning Map and authorize publication. The City Attorney has advised that the City adopt an official zoning map each year. The map included for review reflects rezoning actions which have occurred since the adoption of the last official map in January, 2016. The map proposed includes those rezoning amendments adopted in 2016, as follows: • Ordinance No. 644 - Rezoning the Monticello Middle School plat from A -O to R-1 • Ordinance No. 645 - Rezoning the Pinewood Elementary parcels from A -O to R-1 • Ordinance No. 649 - Rezoning the Monticello High School to Planned Unit Development • Ordinance No. 650 - Rezoning the Mills Fleet Farm plat from B-4 to Planned Unit Development • Ordinance No. 651 - Rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park (Red Rooster) • Ordinance No. 655 - Rezoning to from B-4 to B-3 for Camping World plat parcel • Ordinance No. 656 - Rezoning from B-4 to B-3 for Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street Addition (Moon Motors) In recommending adoption of the Official Zoning Map, the Planning Commission will also recommend adoption of the Shoreland Overlay District, the boundaries for which are in accordance with requirements of both State statute and the Zoning Ordinance. There are no changes to the Shoreland Overlay District proposed and therefore staff is recommending adoption of the current map with no amendments proposed. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed 2017 Official Zoning Map on January 3rd, 2017 and held a public hearing on the proposed map. The Commission also held a follow-up public hearing on February 7th, 2017 to review a revision to the proposed official zoning map to illustrate the Special Use Overlay District boundaries. The map is now consistent with the Special Use Overlay District boundary as reviewed by the Planning Commission in January. No comments from City Council Agenda — 02/13/17 the public were offered during either public hearing. The Planning Commission unanimously recommends the adoption of the map as presented. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission recommends Alternative I below. 1. Motion to Ordinance No. 660 for the 2017 City of Monticello Official Zoning Map, including Shoreland/Floodplain companion map, based on the findings in Planning Commission resolution #PC -2017-001 and #PC -2017-004. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the City of Monticello Official Zoning Map as proposed. This draft represents an accurate picture of Monticello's zoning based on a review of available records and ordinances. The City Attorney has advised that the City adopt an official zoning map each year. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Ordinance No. 660, Draft B. Resolution No. PC -2017-001 C. Resolution No. PC -2017-004 D. 2017 Official Zoning Map, Proposed (dated 1/23/17) E. Shoreland and Floodplain Boundary, City of Monticello (dated 2/12/14) 0 ORDINANCE NO. 660 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND ADOPTING THE 2017 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The zoning map amendments attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" are adopted as the Official Zoning Map under Title 10, Section 3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Monticello. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall upon request. ADOPTED AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION BY the Monticello City Council this 13th day of February, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: ORDINANCE NO. 660 EXHIBIT "A" Following are the approved amendments to the Official Zoning Map • Ordinance No. 644 — Rezoning the Monticello Middle School plat from A -O to R-1 • Ordinance No. 645 — Rezoning the Pinewood Elementary parcels from A -O to R-1 • Ordinance No. 649 — Rezoning the Monticello High School to Planned Unit Development • Ordinance No. 650 — Rezoning the Mills Fleet Farm plat from B-4 to Planned Unit Development • Ordinance No. 651 — Rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park (Red Rooster) • Ordinance No. 655 — Rezoning to from B-4 to B-3 for Camping World • Ordinance No. 656 — Rezoning from B-4 to B-3 for Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street Addition (Moon Motors) CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-001 RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP IN ITS ENTIRETY WHEREAS, the Zoning Map of the City of Monticello requires amendment; and WHEREAS, the proposed map would accommodate and further the intentions and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning would be consistent with the City's land use plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello finds that the proposed zoning map will be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive land use plan and proposed zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on January 3rd, 2017 to review the requests and receive public comment on the zoning map amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed zoning map has met the requirements for adoption as found in the zoning ordinance and state law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the zoning map amendment to be identified as Ordinance No. 660. ADOPTED this Yd day of January, 2017 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. AT ST: Angela Schty LIM PLANNING Brad HM. Chair Development Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-004 RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP IN ITS ENTIRETY WHEREAS, the Zoning Map of the City of Monticello requires amendment; and WHEREAS, the proposed map would accommodate and further the intentions and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning would be consistent with the City's land use plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello finds that the proposed zoning map will be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive land use plan and proposed zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on January 3rd, 2017 and February 7th, 2017 to review the requests and receive public comment on the zoning map amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed zoning map, including Shoreland/Floodplain map, has met the requirements for adoption as found in the zoning ordinance and state law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the zoning map amendment to be identified as Ordinance No. 6 . ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2017 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Brad Fyle, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Legend I — — I ICit of Monticello I i Off ici I Zoning M P � � I \ 1 I \ \ I \ \ I \� I \ I \ \ I \ o I \\ 3 \ � I \ \ I � I I ---------— c --- ----_ I — — — — — — — — — — — —I \ Praire Rd Hi W E I \ I � I e�, I BASE ZONING DISTRICTS d Residential DistrictsBusiness Districts i -- Low Residential Densities- \ (k Kama w3 d i i AO R -A R-1 -- Medium Residential Densities T -N R-2 C R -PUD -- High Residential Densities 8-2 8-3 . 8-4 CCD Industrial Districts ] pec 1-1 R-3 ----------, 01 Swan River --------- ; Monticello M -H' PUDs L-------- High School OTHER Water OVERLAY DISTRICTS ----------1 03 il Mills Fleet Farm ----------1 04 1 Red Rooster Performance Based Overlay District Special Use Overlay District Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District Shoreland District I Freeway Bonus Sign District • • \\�� ` I � c Sys ; h ., � � — \ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — jfJ/yI►.J[ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — i I[IIiijm MAN ►■ �■ IIIII �C U � !i ■S = 1111■ ■ 11111111 } -------- City Council Agenda — 02/13/2017 2N. Consideration of approving a request for simple subdivision resulting in two buildable parcels in the R-1 (Single-Familv Residence) District to facilitate right of wav for 7th Street/Fallon Avenue, per Citv Ordinance Title 11, Chapter 1, Section 7 Applicant: Citv of Monticello (NAC) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 1, Church of St. Henry PID: 155115001010 Planning Case Number: 2017-004 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Subdivision of a parcel to accommodate the City's acquisition of right of way for the 7th Street/Fallon Avenue roundabout. Deadline for Decision: March 18th, 2017 Land Use Designation: Places to Live/Places for Community Zoning Designation: R-1, Single Residence District The purpose of the "R-1" single family district is to provide for low density, single family, detached residential dwelling units and directly related complementary uses. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District Current Site Use: Vacant/Open Space Surrounding Land Uses: North: Single Family Residential East: Church of St. Henry South: Interstate 94 - Industrial West: Multiple Family Residential Project Description: The parcel in question is the northwesterly most of several parcels that comprise the Church of St. Henry campus. The parcel fronts on a portion of 7th Street, and is situated at the location where the Fallon Avenue overpass with intersect with 7th Street at a planned roundabout. The City proposes to acquire a portion of the subject parcel to accommodate right of way for the City Council Agenda — 02/13/2017 roundabout project. The Church would retain the residual parcel adjacent to the remainder of the campus. ANALYSIS As noted above, the City is seeking to acquire a portion of an existing parcel, part of the Church of St. Henry plat. The parcel is question is 6.8 acres in area, and the City would acquire approximately 1.7 acres of that parcel for right of way purposes, with the remaining 5.1 acres remaining with the church. The Subdivision Ordinance, in Section 11-1-7, provides for simple subdivision of lots that are currently platted and do not create more than one new building lot. The Ordinance allows for such "simple subdivisions" to proceed without requiring a full plat or the normal public hearing requirements that larger subdivisions entail. Such subdivisions result in a "metes and bounds" description, essentially describing parts of the underlying platted lots. Occasionally, the County Recorder determines that the new descriptions are not recordable. While staff does not anticipate that likelihood in this case, in that were to occur, a plat would be required, and the applicants would need to reapply for a platted subdivision. The Subdivision Ordinance permits non -platted subdivisions under this exception to the general platting requirement: (A) In the case of a request to divide a lot which is part of an existing lot of record where the division is to permit the adding of a parcel of land to an abutting lot or to create two lots and the newly created property line will not cause the other remaining portion of the lot to be in violation with this ordinance or the zoning ordinance, except that no such division of a lot or parcel shall be permitted when said division shall create a lot or parcel that is in violation of Chapter 8, Subdivision 11-8-2, of this ordinance. For reference, Section 11-8-2 prohibits non -platted subdivisions creating more than 2 new parcels, and requires compliance with zoning standards as a qualification for the platting exception. The proposed subdivision is consistent with these principals, in that the newly created parcel will be utilized for right of way on the west (only public improvements would be made on this portion of the subdivision). For the remaining 5.1 acre parcel being retained by the church, the property would remain in its existing condition. Future Oil City Council Agenda — 02/13/2017 uses by the church, if proposed, would be subject to the normal zoning process, and would not be affected the subdivision. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the simple subdivision after review during their meeting of February 7th, 2017. The Commissioners inquired as to the alignment of 7th and Fallon with the inclusion of the roundabout and were provided with information on the proposed subdivision relative to the conceptual alignment. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Planning Commission recommends alternative I below. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2017- 04 recommending approval of the simple subdivision for the City of Monticello and the Church of St. Henry, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2017-04, based on findings to be cited at the City Council meeting. 3. Motion to table action on the resolution, subject to additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the subdivision, based on findings that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, as well as compliance with the conditions identified in Exhibit Z. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Z — Conditions of Approval B. Resolution 2017-04 C. Resolution PC -2017-005 D. Aerial Image, Subject Site E. Subdivision Illustration and Legal Description 3 City Council Agenda — 02/13/2017 EXHIBIT Z Simple Subdivision Lot 1, Block 1, Church of St. Henry Addition Conditions of approval for the proposed Simple Subdivision: 1. Conveyance of the 1.7 acre parcel from the current owner to the City of Monticello. 2. In the event the County rejects the descriptions of the metes and bounds subdivision, the applicant will need to re -apply and utilize a formal plat process. 3. Compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer regarding easements, grading, drainage, and utilities. L! CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03 APPROVING A SIMPLE SUBDIVISION RESULTING IN CONFORMING BUILDABLE PARCELS IN THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT TO PROVIDE RIGHT OF WAY FOR CITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to resubdivide a platted lot in the R-1 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the resultant parcels will meet or exceed the requirements of the R-1 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the property is designated as "Places to Live" and "Places for Community" on the Comprehensive Plan land use map; and WHEREAS, the subdivision will be consistent with the existing and future land uses of the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision meets the qualifying requirements for non - platted subdivisions according to the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the item at an open meeting on February 7th, 2017 and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello has made the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The resubdivision is consistent with the requirements of the zoning and subdivision ordinances. 2. The resubdivision will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area. 3. The subdivision, together with the conditions of approval recommended in the staff report on the item, will accommodate expected land uses for the neighborhood. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03 The subdivision as legally described on the attached Exhibit A is approved based on the findings as made by the Monticello Planning Commission and subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Conveyance of the 1.7 acre parcel from the current owner to the City of Monticello. 2. In the event the County rejects the descriptions of the metes and bounds subdivision, the applicant will need to re -apply and utilize a formal plat process. 3. Compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer regarding easements, grading, drainage, and utilities. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 13th day of February, 2017. ATTEST: Monticello , City Clerk 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03 EXHIBIT A That part of Lot 1, Block 1, CHURCH OF ST. HENRY, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, thence on an assumed bearing of South 69 degrees 22 minutes 36 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 110.93 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 06 degrees 04 minutes 52 seconds West a distance of 105.10 feet; thence South 07 degrees 19 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 225.34 feet; thence South 01 degrees 14 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 94.63 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating. 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-005 Motion By: Seconded By: RECOMENDING APPROVAL OF A SIMPLE SUBDIVISION RESULTING IN CONFORMING BUILDABLE PARCELS IN THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT TO PROVIDE RIGHT OF WAY FOR CITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to resubdivide a platted lot in the R-1 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the resultant parcels will meet or exceed the requirements of the R-1 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the property is designated as "Places to Live" and "Places for Community" on the Comprehensive Plan land use map; and WHEREAS, the subdivision will be consistent with the existing and future land uses of the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision meets the qualifying requirements for non - platted subdivisions according to the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the item at an open meeting on February 7th, 2017 and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The resubdivision is consistent with the requirements of the zoning and subdivision ordinances. 2. The resubdivision will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area. 3. The subdivision, together with the conditions of approval recommended in the staff report on the item, will accommodate expected land uses for the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the subdivision subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-005 1. Conveyance of the 1.7 acre parcel from the current owner to the City of Monticello. 2. In the event the County rejects the descriptions of the metes and bounds subdivision, the applicant will need to re -apply and utilize a formal plat process. 3. Compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer regarding easements, grading, drainage, and utilities. ADOPTED this 7th day of November, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Brad Fyle, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director K City of Monticello -Request for Simple Subdivision Created by: City of Monticello Lot 1, Block 1, Church of St. Henry 1st Addition I PID 155-115-001010 City Council Agenda: 2/13/17 20. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-04 calling for a Public Hearing for vacation of 120" Street right of wav remnant parcels (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: When Wright County realigned CSAH 75 in the northwest area of the City in 2010, a portion of 120th Street NE between I-94 and CSAH 75 was vacated with a new roadway easement conveyed to the City by Xcel Energy. The City Council approved an agreement with Xcel Energy for this conveyance on April 9, 2012 (see attached supporting documentation for background information). Wright County was in the process of cleaning up their files and submitted a letter to the City indicating that there were two small remnant parcels along 120th Street NE that still need to be vacated by the City as part of CSAH 75 realignment project. The portions of right of way to be vacated are parcels 4 and 4A of Wright County Right of Way Plat No. 66. Parcel 4 encompasses 310 square feet and parcel 4A encompasses 1,547 square feet for a total of 1,857 square feet to be vacated. Once vacated, the parcels will automatically be turned back to Xcel Energy, who is the underlying fee owner. Xcel has been contacted and has no issue with the vacation. Al. Budget impact: Costs for publication of the public hearing notice in the Monticello Times. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time as this is a housekeeping item. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution #2017-04 calling for public hearing on March 13, 2017 to consider vacating 1201h Street right of way remnant parcels. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #2017-04 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution #2017-04 B. Letter from Wright County C. Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 66 D. 04/09/12 Council agenda item CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-04 CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 120TH STREET REMNANT PARCELS WHEREAS, Wright County is requesting to vacate 120th Street right of way remnant parcels; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council will consider the vacation of 120th Street right of way remnant parcels described as: parcels 4 and 4A of Wright County Right of Way Plat No. 66 where parcel 4 encompasses 310 square feet and parcel 4A encompasses 1,547 square feet for a total of 1,857 square feet to be vacated; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREB Y RESOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Council will consider the vacation of right of way at a public hearing to be held on March 13, 2017 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at the Monticello Community Center. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give published, posted and mailed notice of such hearing as required by law. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this 13th day of February, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Jeff O'Neill WRIGHT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS City Administrator Monticello City Hall 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Wright County Public Works Building 1901 Highway 25 North Buffalo, MN 55313 Jct. T.H. 25 and C.R. 138 Telephone: (763) 682-7383 FAX. (763) 682-7313 Re: Wright County CSAH 75 at 120th Street Mr. O'Neill: VIRGIL G. HAWKINS, P.E. Highway Engineer (763) 682-7388 CHAD D. HAUSMANN, P.E. Assistant Highway Engineer (763) 682-7387 MARK A. JOHNSON Right -of -Way Agent (763) 682-7386 STEVE P. MEYER Hwy Mntnc Superintendent 763-682-7374 It has come to my attention that one last detail of our CSAH 75 project which eliminated the BNSF overpass near the nuclear plant is left. Last we heard, the former City Engineer was to pursue vacation of two slivers of old city R/W, which in effect would return this land to NSP. It appears this was never completed. I am about to retire as Wright County Right of Way Agent, and am working to clean up some details. The County is not involved beyond this point, and we would ask you coordinate with Xcel, as it is in their interest this is completed. This would eliminate any cloud or flaw which could turn up should this land be transferred in the future. Attached is a sample vacation resolution for your use. Also enclosed is a copy of the plat with the area in question highlighted. Future contacts should be with Mr. Chad Peterson, Senior Land Rights Agent for Xcel. He can be reached at 612-330-7825 and email of chad.t.peterson(@xcelenerEv.com. Sincerely, Mark Johnson, Agent Wright County ighway Department a ( " 1 a e B IF—m Al I '1 c h yi �/� �^ ®g�k� AG.[lA0 �►/ a� $ 6 s k} r/la 3u 9'ii rttis r . ......sy., ._ 4 Mill Big �' Ean /,..AR an •W / , IOW I^ Lo 6'g ly Rr �Fb I y� I I a ., 9?$Iz ' 11 .'T •' t ��'Zo i [ 6z �y3 4 /d �r}�4 a 11 1•� 4� 1 / �� l.t- IN — ¢ xiol'i ,R wuan �/ ^fit / R Zo i m� �� •� p /JI 0.� a �I / 1 / Cb (l I]iN6 ]is1 4 M N]lM `` City Council Agenda: 04/09/12 5E. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2012-434 acceptins Easement Agreement with Northern States Power ComuanvlXcel EnerQv for the realignment of 120th Street north of Interstate 94 (BW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: During the Wright County State Aid Highway 75 bridge removal and roadway realignment project at the west end of the City, the County realigned the portion of 120`h Street NE between Interstate Highway 94 and CSAH 75 as illustrated in the highlighted area of the attached Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 66_ The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), formerly the Minnesota Highway Department, originally conveyed the roadway easement for 120Th Street NE to the County by way of Quit Claim Deed. This roadway easement was then revoked to the City by the County in 1985. See Resolution No. 85-18 attached. This roadway conveyance is shown on the plat. The section of 120t11 Street NE lying west of I-94 was revoked to Monticello Township at the same time. Xcel Energy (dba NSP) owned the land under 120th Street NE and previously granted the City a Roadway Right -of -Way Easement for the old alignment of 120th Street NE. This old roadway right-of-way easement was vacated when the City Council approved the Cooperative Agreement between Xcel Energy and the City on July 11, 2011, which is attached as supporting data. This agreement assured both parties the exchange of real estate interests required for the realignment of 120`'' Street NE was acceptable to each. The new roadway right of way easement for 120"' Street NE now needs to be conveyed. Attached is Figure A showing the old easement area highlighted in purple, and Figure B which shows the new easement area highlighted in yellow. The original Roadway Right -of -Way Easement for 120th Street NE as vacated by the City per the Cooperative Agreement contained approximately 44,576 square feet, or 1.023 Acre ("City to NSP Conveyance") It is estimated the new Roadway Right -of - Way Easement area to be granted to the City by NSP ("NSP to City Conveyance") is approximately 57,514 square feet, or 1.32 Acres, This NSP to City Conveyance is conveyed as a grant of easement. NSP was responsible for its document preparation, title work and closing costs. Wright County was responsible for all such costs on behalf of the City. The City shall be responsible for all future maintenance of the realigned section of 120th Street NE. Al. Budget Impact: The City is required to pay $1 for this easement. As per the previously approved Cooperative Agreement, Wright County agreed to bear all costs on behalf of the City for all required document preparation, title work and closing costs related to the realignment of 120 Street NE. City Council Agenda: 04/09/12 A2. Staff Workload Impart: Impacts to staff will be minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to adopt Resolution #2012-034 accepting Easement Agreement with Northern States Power Company/Xcel Energy for the realignment of 120th Street north of Interstate 94. Motion denying adoption of Resolution #2012-034 at this time, C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA.- City ATA: City Resolution #2012-034 Easement Agreement - 120th Street NE Roadway Right -of -Way Easement Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 66 Wright County Resolution No. 55-18 Cooperative Agreement - 1201h Street NE Roadway Right -of -Way Easement Figure A - Existing roadway right-of-way easement Figure B - New roadway right-of-way easement 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2012-034 APPROVING EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH XCEL ENERGY FOR ROADWAY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT FOR 120' STREET NE WHEREAS, 120th Street NE was realigned as part of Wright County's County State Aid Highway (CSAR) 75 realignment project, SAP 086-675-013; and WHEREAS, Xcel Energy (dba NSP) owns the property occupied by 120`h Street NE between Interstate Highway 94 and CSAH 75; and WHEREAS, Xcel Energy formerly granted the City of Monticello a roadway right-of-way easement for the previous alignment of this section of 120th Street NE; and WHEREAS, Xcel Energy and the City of Monticello agreed to vacate the previous roadway right-of-way easement and establish a new roadway right-of-way easement to accommodate the realignment of 120th Street NE as defined in the Cooperative Agreement between Xcel Energy and the City of Monticello as executed on July 11, 2011. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, said Easement Agreement outlining the conveyance of a perpetual roadway right-of- way easement for the realignment of 120 Street NE with Wright County's CSAH 75 project is hereby approved. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 9th day of April, 2012. CITY OF MONTICELLO Clint Herbst, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator 140911111114YrI163,1 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the Monticello City Council at their scheduled meeting on April 9, 2012, and recorded in minutes of said meeting. Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Notary Public: Date: (STAMP) ROADWAY EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, Made this day of , 2012, by and between NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Xcel Energy ("NSP"), and THE CITY OF MONTICEI.LO, Wright County, Minnesota, a statutory city under the laws of the State of Minnesota ("Grantee"), WITNESSETH, That in consideration of the sure of one Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by said Grantee, NSP does hereby give and grant unto said Grantee, a perpetual easement for public use as a public roadway, over, under and across the following described parcel of land located in Wright County, Minnesota, to -wit: ParceIs 4 and 4A of Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 66. (Said parcels being located in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 122, Range 25, and the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section a, Township 121, Range 25.) GRANTEE AGREES, that upon completion of the construction of the roadway located on the herein described easement that Grantee will perform any and all future maintenance on said roadway. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this easement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. NORTH/E�R�N STATES POWER COMPANY By Greg P. Chamberlain, Director Portfolio Delivery & Integration Xcel Energy Services Inc. Authorized Agent for Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Xcel Energy STATE OF MUgNE' SOTA ) )8S. COUNTY OF 18ENNEP11N) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this A l jf day of 1*'1 arah 2012, by Greg P. Chamberlain, Director, Portfolio Delivery & Integration, Xcel Energy Services Inc., as Authorized Agent for Northern States Power Company, a sota corporation, d/b/a Xeel Energy on behalf of the corporation. /r GiipD;. PETERSON Not ublic NOTARY PUBLIO -- - miNNESOTA MyCaMmhaton FMp�raJmn. al. 20,4 i'HE CITY OF MONTICELLO By STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY Or, ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2012, by ,on behalf of the City of Monticello, a statutory city under the laws of the State of Minnesota. This instrument was drafted by: CTP Northern States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Abstract 2011.322 'n rr I of _ y 'pi g ggY 1 ou: R_ _ �- d ap ' lit gig E e ' x x •�F ; �" n e3 .15 1p1 r� ° f w Eg r�Re t•I f TJp #g Rq Sp Z � �A > s� ra ra u sa � •� r� i« >� x33 : f ! f�� • � � ��! . � fid. �ii � %9 ■� _ ,� r� � �� Y r� . t+ � = y j ,� rJ a ik9 '�' �, $iB��`$$� aid $ �;• �;t, I �� ;Rl� A' �, � r -" yam} � •I 1� � `. �. a�1 2+� � wY�1 J I gij� I � • �"% �, •; :•'� r� �.p� f r rid ;� �'� ��h1'�� I t�f �If I •� , rVt It $ ' V I I � ' ' ! l • � � � 1 u� f � � ly T 9! Mir f� 3 J !• r1 � / � ` � 1 •.+� ' � . � ,• fin; . C 0 [• �! �— N.ii�'ayir ih!'Hi _• _tom f:,-,,�:• �'� �,// r �= .jl �� '�:.'- i>,:�,. / r u "SRI ty St a $ Oki 95• !l f f r y + j x. f ! k I r n ur. ud tr= -Apr i1 3U, 1985 � s. ,7ution No._.�85-18 ion by COTT.nr Ssi oner...Nelson _ _Seca-ideci by Coi-wnissioner 5chillewaert fes•-`-+-�' �.-c �f � � �'. ^ 1 � J' RESOLUTION WHEFIZEAS, it appears to the Wright County Board of Commissioners that the below described porton of County Highway should be revoked, and WHEREAS, the hearing required by Minn. Stat.9 163.11, subd. 5a (1982) has been held, NOW THIiER.EFQRE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Wright County Board of Commissioners that pursuant to Minn. Stat. 9 163.11, Subd. 5 (1582) the county highway located in the City of Monticello in the County of Wright, Sta-Ee of Minnesota, described as follows, to -wit: -SEE ATTACHED - is hereby revoked. YES NO McAlpine x McAlp±ne Bogenrief x Bogenrief Engstrom x Engstrom Nelson x Nelson Schillewaert x Schillewaert a STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. County of Wright ) 1, Richard W. Norman, duly appointed, qualified, and acting Cle]r"k to the Cosanty Board for the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy •of a resolution or motion with the original minutes of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners, Wright County, Minnesota, at their session held on the 'An day of At,ri 1 0119 85 1. now on file in my office, and have found the same to be true and correct copy thereof. _ aitne_ss rny hand and official seal at Buffalo, Minnesota, this 3.0 day of 19 $ 5_ir�?rx— Clerk to the County Board �fy RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it appears to the Wright County Board of Commissioners that the below described portion of County Highway should be revoked, and WHEREAS, the hearing required by Minn, Stat. 1 163.11., subd. 5a (1982) has been „ * held, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Wright County Board of Commissioners that pursuant to Minn. Stat, 9 163,11, Subd. 5 (1982) the county highway located in the City of Montipello in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, described as follows, to -wit: -SEE ATTACHED - '0. 12 is hereby revoked. Passed by majority vote of the Wright County Board of Commissioners this day of X/I . 19 Chairman, County Board of Cormniss'ioners ATTEST: Executive Secretary to W,,,ght County hoard of Commissioners 1 `� - -r . 9 - 3 P 3~� ♦- d. ,y'tk''"�'��y� a� + -_ -� a' 'S "'F F6a'_'• `Ct ate♦�,yy,,� - - a - -- _ ' c Manticell I. That part of Tract A anS of Tract B_dcscribed beooi - 'bract A. The Southwest quarter 6E.th,e 5authweae'. � r of Section 33, Townafiip l27 North. Range 25- West; Wright' Cuurity, Manne o" a, _ excepting therekkCM , the:' rail- way right of way; _ i z S 4-e- : •... .. V. Tract I3 The Northwest Quarter• of the Northwest �u2GXS"ectaa>a.�Towasliip T21, North, Range 25 West, Wright County, Miriiies4ihal .wTucii. 3 iea: wtth%rr. a distance _ of 75 -feet northwesterly and 50 feet aouthaaste=ly of Line 3'dese'ribed belo4 and northeasterly of a Line run parallel with'and"d.i.stant 100 feet northeast- erly of Lane 2 described below and which lies within a distance of 75 feet southwesterly of Line 1 described below: Line 1. Beginning at a point on the crest line of said Section 33, distant 683.9 feet north of the southwest corner thereof; thence runt southeasterly at an angle of 43 degrees 40 minutes QC seconds from said west section line (measured from south to east)' -for 203-&4 feet;. thence deflect to the left on a 5 degree 0 minute `bQ seeand curve elta,angl .` 6 degrees og Iu-Lndtea.0[t seccinds fir ' l0 2Q(le,feat.". tFxeince on CaFtgeift to sac# curveb50_feet' aa� there terMMnsting; ',iA' - - Line 2. Beginning at a point ori the west line' of the.Northeast Quarter of the South- east Quarter of Section- 4,,, Township 121AWiarth', Range 25 West, distant 738 feet south of the northwest corner' of said quarter; 1_:thance rust northwesterly at an angle of 48 degrees 03 minutes 00 ,seconds from the west line of said quarter (measured from north to west) for 327.6 feet•, thence- deflect to the right ori a- 0 degree 30 minute 00 second curve (delta angle 9 degrees 29 minutes 04 seconds) er- for 1896.7 feet; thence on tangent to said curve for 4200 feet and there ter- mi.nating. minating. Line 3. Beginning at a point on Lane 2 described above, distant 1283 feet southeasterly of its point of termination; thence run northeasterly at an angle of 63 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds from said Line 2 (measured from southeast to northeast) for 274.8 feet; thence deflect to'theleft on a 29 degree 00 minute 00 second curve (delta angle 64 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds) for 222.4 feet and there terminating; also together with that part of Tract A hereinbefore described adjoining and southerly of a line 75 feet southwesterly of Line 1 described above, northwesterly of the last above described strip, which lies northeast- erly of the' following described line: Beginning at a point on, Line 3 described above, distant 222.4 feet southwesterly of its point of termination; thence run northwesterly at right angles to said Line 3 for 200 feet and there ter- minating; also together with that part of 'tract A and. of Tract B hereinbefore described adjoining and southeasterly of the last above described strip, which lies northeasterly of a line run parallel with and distant 100 feet northeast- erly pf Line 2 described above and northwesterly of a line run parallel with and distant 75 feet southeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at the point of beginning of Line 3 described above; thence run northeasterly on said Line 3 for 272.3 feet and there terminating; 4? 459959 r N/C RETURN TO: Marian, Cou&y" Coordinators Office COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CITY OF MONTICELLO ROADWAY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT This Cooperative Agreement dated _S-("- , 2011, is by and between City of Monticello, hereinafter referred to as "the City", and NarAhern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Xcel Energy, hereinafter referred to as "NSP". BACKGROUND Wright County is proposing to realign a section of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 75 within the westerly City Limits of Monticello, Minnesota, as illustrated on the attached Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 66. The Highway Right of Way Plat No. 66 (the "Plat") depicts the new Permanent Highway Right of Way for the new alignment of CSAR 75, the Temporary Construction Easements required to accommodate construction of the new alignment, and the original alignment of CSAH 75. As part of this realignment, the County will rearrange a portion of the City of Monticello's roadway called 120" Street NE, which lies easterly of Interstate Highway 94 and westerly of CSAH 75. This new alignment is depicted on the Plat. The Minnesota Department of Transportation, Mn DOT, formerly known as the Minnesota Highway Department, by way of quit Claim Deed conveyed a Roadway Easement to the County. This Roadway Easement was Revoked to the City of Monticello by the County in 1985 (Resolution No. 85-18). This roadway conveyance is shown on the Plat. UNDERSTANDING Purpose The purpose of this Agreement is to assure both parties hereto that the exchanges of real estate interests required for this Wright County project are acceptable. Estimated Exchanee of Real Property It is estimated the original Roadway Right of Way Easement for 120`h Street NF to he vacated (released) by the City ("City to NSP Conveyance") contains approximately 44,575 square feet (3..023 Acre). The City Council will vacate (release) this easement following signature by all involved parties to this Agreement. It is further estimated the new Roadway Right of Way Easement area to be granted to the City by NSP ("NSP to City Conveyance") is approximately 57,514 square feet (1.32 Acres). This NSP to City Conveyance is conveyed as a grant of easement Documentation NSP and the City will prepare and submit to the other the proposed documents far the appropriate conveyances. NSP will be responsible for its document preparation, title work and closing costs, and Wright County will be responsible for all such costs on behalf of the City. Maintenance The City shall be responsible for all future maintenance within their roadway easement. Effective This Agreement shall become effective upon signature of all parties to the Agreement. Miscellaneous I. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota, and any disputes hereunder shall be venued in the State of Minnesota. 2. This Agreement shall not be amended except in a writing executed and delivered by all of the Parties hereto. 3. This Agreement is the sole agreement between and/or among the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof. 4. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, including their respective employees, agents, representatives, consultants, subcontractors, successors and assigns. S. Each of the parties represents, warrants, and states, that all legal and corporate actions necessary for the proper effectuation and execution of this Agreement has been validly taken. Further, the individuals whose signatures appear below individually represent and warrant that he/she is duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of his/her respective party. 5. The parties acknowledge that the terms of this Agreement are contractual and not a mere recital. Anaroved by the Citv of Monticello: Clint Herbst, Mayor Date JefO Nity Administrator Date Aouroved by Northern States Power Comoanv: Greg P. Chamberlain, Director Bate Portfolio Delivery & Integration Xcel Energy Services Inc. Authorized Agent for Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Xcel Energy 2 0 M � � r l Council Meeting - 2/13/2017 2P. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 661 amending the Citv Code of Ordinances Title 8, Chapter 3, Trees and Shrubs and adopting Summary Ordinance 661A for Publication (TP) A. REFERANCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to adopt an ordinance amending Section 8, Chapter 3, Trees and Shrubs. The amendment is prompted by recent changes to the 2017 City Fee Schedule. Currently, the Trees and Shrubs section of the ordinance stipulates that the City will reimburse residents for half of the cost of removal up to $225 per tree if they contract with the City for removal. Putting the City as the middle man for tree removal is very time consuming and cumbersome with requesting quotes, contacting the property owner, following up on the removal process and finally for the reimbursement. The amendment being made to this section will eliminate the City reimbursement for contract removal of the tree in order to take the City out as the middle man and require the property owner to contract for their diseased tree removal. Further, the city will share in the replacement cost of new trees up to $50 per property. Tree diseases, other than Dutch Elm or Oak Wilt are also reflected in amendments to the ordinance. The amendments being presented are those considered to be more "housekeeping" in nature by correcting existing conflicts, errors or omissions, and the changes are unanimously recommended by the Monticello Parks Commission. Al. Budget Impact: Shade Tree Fund should have a reduction for tree reimbursement in 2017. However, tree replacement funds will be used to reinvest in the City's urban reforestation program. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Administration of Shade Tree Program and staff time to inspect for diseased trees. Less time will be involved by the City not acting as the middle man or subcontractor for tree removal on private property. This gives the property owner the responsibility to choose their own contractor for tree removal. B. ALTERNATIVES ACTIONS: Motion to adopt Ordinance 661 amending City Ordinance Section 8, Chapter 3, Tree and Shrubs and adopting Ordinance 661A for publication. 2. The second alternative is to deny changes to the City Ordinance as presented. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff and the Monticello Parks Commission support amending the City Ordinance to reflect the changes as presented and outlined in Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Draft Ordinance 661 amending City Ordinance Section 8, Chapter 3, Trees and Shrubs. B. Draft Summary Ordinance 661A ORDINANCE 660 AMENDING CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES — TITLE 8, CHAPTER 3 TITLED TREE AND SHRUBS CHAPTER 3 TREES AND SHRUBS SECTION: 8-3-1: Purpose 8-3-2: Prohibited Trees 8-3-3: Order to Treat or Remove 8-3-4: Regulations for Planting in Public Places 8-3-5: Requirements Applicable to Trees in New Subdivisions 8-3-6: Shade Tree Disease and Insect Control 8-3-7: Abuse or Mutilation 8-3-1: PURPOSE: It is the purpose of this chapter to protect and promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the city by regulating the planting and maintenance of trees in order to protect trees and to prevent and abate hazardous and nuisance conditions within the city. 8-3-2: PROHIBITED TREES: It is lawful to plant only the n d speies of elm highly disease resistant elm species within the city limits with the approval of the City Forester. The EJ.rn i?. a Dutoh Di&ease resistant tree. (#29, 5/9/77) (#495, 1/26/09) 8-3-3: ORDER TO TREAT OR REMOVE: The City may order the trimming, treatment, or removal of trees or plants upon public or private property when they shall determine that such action is necessary to the public safety or necessary to prevent the spread of disease or of insects harmful to trees and shrubs. 8-3-4: REGULATIONS FOR PLANTING IN PUBLIC PLACES: (A) No tree shall be planted or placed on public property or right-of-way without the approval of the City €ngineefForester. (B) Permits: No person shall plant or remove trees or shrubs in public places without first filling out an application and obtaining a permit from the City. 2. The following provisions apply to the issuance of permits where required for planting in public places: (a) Application Data: The application required herein shall state the number of trees or plants to be planted or set out, the location, and specific name of each tree or plant. (b) Standards for Issuance: A permit shall be issued if it is found that the proposed plantings will be in the best interest of the community. 8-3-5: REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO TREES IN NEW SUBDIVISIONS: (A) In new subdivisions, on lots with frontage on a single right-of-way, it is required that two (2) trees be planted per platted lot if no trees are in existence. For lots with frontage on more than one right-of-way, it is required that four (4) trees be planted per platted lot if no trees are in existence. Two (2) trees must be planted in the boulevard adjoining each yard having street frontage. (#287, 3/24/97) (#267, 3/27/95) (B) In subdivision plantings, not less than two (2) or more than three (3) species of trees shall be planted in any block, and neither less than twenty percent (20%) nor more than fifty percent (50%) of the total trees planted in a block may be of the same species. Only trees listed in Section 8-3-2 of this chapter shall be planted (C) Required trees shall be planted in the boulevard at a location ranging from 4 ft. to 10 ft from the curb. Precise location within this range to be determined by the City. (#287, 3/24/97) (#267, 3/27/95) (D) Required subdivision trees must have a trunk diameter of at least two inches (2") at one foot (1') above the ground. (E) Required subdivision trees must be protected and supported by tree guards of approved type. (F) No required subdivision tree shall be planted in soil too poor to ensure the growth of such tree unless twenty-seven (27) cubic feet (3'x3'x3') of soil is removed and replaced with suitable loam. 8-3-6: SHADE TREE DISEASE AND INSECT CONTROL: (A) Forester Duties: The powers and duties of the City Forester as set forth in this code are hereby conferred upon the Park Inspector. It is the duty of the Forester to coordinate, under the direction and control of the Council, all activities of the municipality relating to the control and prevention of Shade Tree disease. 14e The City Forester shall recommend to the Council the details of a program for the control of Shade Tree disease and perform the duties incident to such a program adopted by the Council. (#495, 1/26/09) (B) Program: It is the intention of the Council of Monticello to conduct a program of plant pest control pursuant to the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes 1961, Section 18.022. This program is directed specifically at the control and elimination of Dutch Elm disease fungus, elm bark beetles, oak wilt, Emerald Ash Borer and other tree diseases; and is undertaken at the recommendation of the Commissioner of Agriculture and the Council in the conduct of this program. (#495, 1/26/09) (C) Nuisance Declared: The prevention, control and abatement of Dutch Elm disease, affd Oak Wilt disease, effd Emerald Ash Borer and other inseet tree diseases is necessary for the protection, preservation and conservation of public and private lands and the investment and benefit therein, and to protect and promote the general welfare of the public and this community Therefore, the following conditions are hereby found and declared to be a public nuisance wherever they exist in the City of Monticello. 1. Any living or dead Elm tree or part thereof infected to any degree with the Dutch Elm disease fungus Certatocystits ulmi (Buisman) Moreau or which harbors any of the elm bark beetles Scolytus Multistriatus (Eichhh) or Hylugropinus rufipes (Marsh). 2. Any dead Elm tree or part thereof, including logs, branches, stumps, firewood, or other Elm material from which the bark has not been removed or burned. 3. Any living or dead oak tree or part thereof infected to any degree with the oak wilt fungus (ceratocytis fagacearum). 4. Any living or dead Fraxinus spp tree or part thereof infected to any degree with the insect Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus Planipennix) or any other tree species infected with a disease. (#495, 1/26/09) (D) Prohibition. It is unlawful for any person to permit any public nuisance as defined in (C) 1, 2, 3 and 4 to remain on any premises owned or controlled by such person within the City of Monticello. Such nuisances may be abated in the manner prescribed by this Chapter. (#495, 1/26/09) (E) Inspection and Investigation: The Forester shall inspect all premises and places within the city as often as practicable to determine whether any condition declared in (C) to be a public nuisance exists thereon. All reported incidents of infestation of Dutch Elm fungus, the presence of elm bark beetles, of infection by the oak wilt fungus or the presence of Emerald Ash borer or other tree infestations shall be promptly investigated. (#495, 1/26/09) (F) Entry on Private Premises: The Forester or his/her duly authorized agents may enter upon private premises at any reasonable time for the purpose of carrying out any of the duties assigned l under this chapter. (G) Diagnosis: The Forester shall, upon finding conditions indicating Dutch Elm disease or other infestation, immediately send appropriate specimens or samples to the Commissioner of Agriculture for analysis or take such other steps for diagnosis as may be recommended by the Commissioner. Except as provided in (J), no action to remove infected trees or wood shall be taken until positive diagnosis of the disease has been made. (#495, 1/26/09) (H) Abatement Generally: No action to remove, destroy and dispose or require the removal, destruction and disposal of elm trees, wood infected with Dutch Elm fungus, oak trees infected by oak wilt fungus or Fraxinus spp (ash) trees or Fraxinus spp (ash) wood harboring Emerald Ash Borer shall be taken until a reasonably certain diagnosis of the disease has been made. When such reasonably certain diagnosis has been made, the infected tree or wood shall be removed, destroyed and disposed of in a manner which will effectively destroy and prevent as fully as possible the spread of the Dutch Elm or oak wilt disease fungus, or the spread of Emerald Ash Borer populations or other tree diseases will be handled by the recommendations of the Commissioner of Agriculture. 1. Presence of Elm Bark Beetles or Emerald Ash Borer: When the presence of elm bark beetles has been discovered in or upon any living elm tree but the presence of Dutch Elm disease fungus is not then or thereafter diagnosed, the tree shall be treated in a manner which will effectively destroy and prevent as full as possible the spread of the elm bark beetle. When the presence of Emerald Ash Borer has been discovered in or upon a living Fraxinus (ash) tree, the tree shall be treated in a manner which will effectively destroy and prevent as full as possible the spread of the Emerald Ash Borer. If such treatment is not or, because of the extent of infestation, cannot be effective, the tree shall be removed, destroyed and disposed of. 2. Dead Elm or Fraxinus (ash) Trees, Logs, Stumps, etc.: Standing dead elm trees, elm logs, branches, stumps, firewood or other raw material from which the bark has not been removed and which are not infected with Dutch Elm disease fungus, shall have the bark removed, destroyed and disposed of or shall be treated in a manner which will effectively destroy and prevent as fully as possible the spread of the elm bark beetle, erre Emerald Ash Borer or other diagnosed tree diseases. If such treatment is not effective, or, because of the extent of infestation, cannot be effective, the trees, logs, branches, stumps, firewood or other raw elm material shall be removed, destroyed and disposed of. 3. Specifications and Procedures: The City Forester shall establish specifications and procedures for the removal, destruction and disposal of trees and wood infected with Dutch Elm disease fungus, Oak Wilt fungus or Emerald Ash Borer for treating live elm or Fraxinus (ash) tree infested with elm bark beetles or Emerald Ash Borers, and for removing, destroying and disposing of elm or Fraxinus (ash) trees, logs, branches, stumps, firewood and other raw elm material. Such specifications and procedures shall be consistent with current specifications and procedures designated or approved by the Commissioner of Agriculture. (#495, 1/26/09) (I) Abatement on Private or Government Property: Whenever a nuisance as defined in (C) is found to exist on private property outside any public way in the city, or upon property owned and controlled by a governmental unit other than the city, the owner or person in control of such property shall be notified in writing by r-eg d mail or by personal delivery, that such condition exists. Once the letter is received by the property owner, it is their responsibility to contact the Public Works Department and arrange actions for removal. The notice -,'a11 a'raa states that if such nuisance is not abated by the owner or person in control of such property within twenty (20) days after receipt of such notice, in the manner prescribed by the City Forester, the city by and through its City Council may enter upon the premises and abate the nuisance. If the owner or person in control of any private premises upon which such a nuisance exists does not abate or eliminate the same within twenty -thirty (-20 30) days after receipt of notification, the City Council, its officers, employees and agents shall proceed to have such nuisance properly abated or eliminated. (#495, 1/26/09) (J) Abatement on City Property: Nuisances as defined in (C) which exist upon property owned or controlled by the city, including public street right of way, shall be abated or eliminated by the City Council forthwith in accordance with established specifications and procedures. (#495, 1/26/09) (K) Cost of Abatement: If, pursuant to section (I), the City Council orders the removal or abatement of such nuisance, the City Forester shall report the cost of the removal or abatement to the Council and the expense thereof plus an amount determined by the City Council to reimburse the City for its cost of inspection and eradication shall be assessed by the Council upon the lot or lots on which the nuisance was located, notice being first given by publication in the official paper of the time and place that such assessment shall be made. The assessment procedure shall be as prescribed by Minnesota Statutes Section 429.101 and said assessment shall be a lien on the lot or lots and shall be returned and collected in the same manner as other city taxes. (#492, 1/26/09) (L) Procedures for Removal of Infected Trees and Wood: 1. Whenever the forester finds with reasonable certainty that infestation defined in (C) exists in any tree or wood in any public or private place in the city, he shall proceed as follows: (a) If the forester finds that the danger of infestation of other elm trees is not imminent because of elm dormancy, he shall make a written report of his findings to the Council which shall proceed by (1) abating the nuisance as a public improvement under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, or (2) abating the nuisance as provided in 2 of this section. (b) If the forester finds that danger of infestation of other elm trees is imminent, he the forester shall notify the property owner by eet4ified mail and/or by leaving notice at the property and that the nuisance will be abated within a specified time, not less than 5 days from the date of mailing of such notice. The forester shall immediately report such action to the Council; and after the expiration of the time limited by the notice, he the forester may abate the nuisance. 2. Upon receipt of the forester's report required by 1, part (a), the Council shall by resolution order the nuisance abated. Before action is taken on such resolution, the Council shall publish notice of its intention to meet to consider taking action to abate the nuisance. This notice shall be mailed to affected property owners and published once not less than one week prior to such meeting. The notice shall state the time and place of the meeting, the streets affected, action proposed, the estimated cost of the abatement, and the proposed basis of assessment, if any, of costs. At such hearing or adjournment thereof, the Council shall hear property owners with reference to the scope and desirability of the proposed project. The Council shall thereafter adopt a resolution confirming the original resolution with such modifications as it considers desirable and provide for the doing of the work by day labor or by contract. 3. The forester shall keep a record of the costs of abatements done under this section and shall report monthly to the City Clerk all work done for which assessments are to be made stating and certifying the description of the land, lots, and parcels involved and the amount chargeable to each. 4. On or before September 1 of each year, the Clerk shall list the total unpaid charges for each abatement against each separate lot or parcel to which they are attributable under this ordinance. The Council may then spread the charges or any portion thereof against the property involved as a special assessment under Minnesota Statutes Section 420.101, and other pertinent statutes for certification to the County Auditor and collection the following year along with current taxes. The City Council of Monticello has determined that the health of the trees within the municipal limits is threatened by a fatal disease known as Dutch Elm disease, oak wilt, of Emerald Ash Borer or other fatal tree disease. It has further determined that the loss of these trees growing upon public and private property would substantially depreciate the value of property within the city and impair the safety, good order, general welfare, and convenience of the public. It is declared to be the intention of the Council to control and prevent the spread of this disease, and this ordinance is being enacted for that purpose. It is declared to be the intention of the Council to establish a policy for sharing in the cost of replacement tree(s) in the amount of up to $50.00 per property shafing the st of'abatement of shade tFee dicowo :suioaxse with the r pei4y own . 94he City ; .,traete for- the tree removal, a ,-edit of half ( f',- X2) the eest eom..y l up t $225 ,.or tree will be;11 o ;�t, �1,� p�;p�,t— o s;L.lo for- the ro st of r-em&val plu"ales ax. (#495, 1/26/09) (M) Spraying Elm Trees: Whenever the forester determines that any elm tree or elm wood within the city is infected with Dutch Elm fungus, he the forester may s}r-ay treat all nearby high value elm trees with an effective elm bark beetle destroying concentrate. gpfayin Treating activities authorized by this section shall be conducted in accordance with technical and expert opinions and plans of the Commissioner of Agriculture and under the supervision of the Commissioner and his agents whenever possible. (N) Transporting Elm Wood Prohibited: It is unlawful for any person to transport within the city any bark -bearing elm wood without having obtained a permit from the forester. The forester shall grant permits only when the purposes of the chapter will be served thereby. (0) Interference Prohibited: No person shall prevent, delay, or interfere with the forester or leis the foresters agents while they are engaged in the performance of duties imposed by this chapter. 8-3-7: ABUSE OR MUTILIATION: No person shall (A) damage, cut, carve, kill, or injure the bark of any tree or plant on any public property; (B) attach any rope, wire, or other contrivance to any tree or plant on public property; (C) dig in or otherwise disturb public grass areas, or in any other way injure or impair the natural beauty or usefulness of any area or public property; (D) cause or permit any wire charged with electricity or any gaseous, liquid, or solid substance harmful to trees or plants to come in contact with them. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, this 13th day of February, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: ABSENT: SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 661A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 8 — CHAPTER 3 — TREES AND SHRUBS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on February 13, 2017 Ordinance No. 661 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 661, the following Summary Ordinance No. 661A has been prepared for publication as authorized by state law. The ordinance adopted by the Council amends Title 8, Chapter 3 of the Monticello Zoning Code. The general purpose of the ordinance amendments are to clarify various chapters and sections with changes to the following: 8-3-2: Prohibited Trees 8-3-4: Regulations for Planting in Public Places 8-3-6: Shade Tree Disease and Insect Control 8.4: Definitions A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. The complete ordinance will be posted on the City's website following publication. APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, this 13th day of February, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: City Council Agenda 02/13/2017 2Q. Consideration of authorizing an appraisal on the former municipal bio -solids property for the purpose of decisions regarding future sale. A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider directing staff to coordinate selection of an appraiser for the purpose of establishing the current value of the former municipal bio -solids site with the intent to place the property for sale soon thereafter. The bio -solids site consists of approximately 130 net acres of agricultural land featuring a pump and irrigation well. The property is located within the Monticello Orderly Annexation area. A number of factors that have delayed this action have been resolved which now puts the City Council in position to conduct a sale. These items include: • Establishment of solar array on this site yielding a generous selling price is not likely due to its location outside of Xcel service area and current MOAA regulations which do not allow for principal use solar gardens. • The process of subdividing the 27 acres from the original bio -solid site to enable full development of the Bertram Athletic Complex and associated conversion of the existing Xcel ball fields. These processes are now complete in the majority. • Public Works staff have noted that the equipment currently stored in the sheds on site does not require inside storage and can be moved to other locations and stored outside. In the alternative, an option for a use agreement for one or both buildings with the buyer could be explored. • Staff has reviewed the site for potential need for utility and roadway easements and believe that it is prudent to consider establishment of the following easements across the site prior to sale. An appraisal process could include an analysis of the impact of such easements on the value. 0 60' roadway and utility easement along the easterly north/south property line providing for a roadway to the Bertram Park camping site and athletic fields. 0 30' easement along the southerly line bordering the athletic fields to enable potential installation of sewer and water without disturbing athletic complex. 0 15' roadway easement on the Briarwood side to preserve space for future widening if needed. o A 75' easement on the County Road 39 side for future 30 -foot deep sanitary sewer extension to serve northwest area. Depending on how the bio -solids site and the properties on the north side of CR 39 develop, there could be alternative sewer alignments and shallower depths, where this easement is not necessary. City Council Agenda 02/13/2017 o In the event the property is sold for development with roadway and utility corridors addressed by the development pattern, then at that time the easements noted above could be vacated. The original funds used to purchase the site were derived from the water and sewer fund. It has been the intent of the Council to sell the property if not needed for bio -solids. This intent predated the purchase of the YMCA property and development of plans to create an attractive premier park amenity for current and future residents. Although the land is directly adjacent to Bertram and would therefore be a great location for residential development, the bio -solids site is not likely to be ripe for development in the foreseeable future. Therefore, it could be sold today for agricultural use without undue fear of being shortsighted by not holding on to it for the opportunity to team with a developer. The cost of utilities to "leap" to the site from the current location would be very high. It is more likely that the bio -solids site will be served in the very long term via a sewer and water system extended incrementally over time as the intervening property west of County Road 39 develops. Al. Budget Impact: Unless Council desires that quotes received are brought back to Council prior to award, staff will process quotes and direct the work accordingly based on cost and conformance to request requirements. Generally speaking, appraisal expenses for this type of work can vary from a few thousand to $7,000. The Sewer Access Fund would be used to fund this expense. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Nominal, including development of appraisal request and cost/service comparison and coordination with appraiser on project analysis. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to authorize staff to obtain an appraisal on the former bio -solids property for the purpose of establishing a value for future decision-making and sale. 2. Motion to deny authorization to obtain an appraisal on the former bio -solids property for the purpose of establishing a value for future decision-making and sale. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Obtaining an appraisal which evaluates the site in terms of current market conditions and location will support future Council decision-making related to proceeding with sale of the site, establishing the sale price, possible use of a real estate service, and ultimately in land negotiations. City Council Agenda 02/13/2017 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Aerial Site Image B. Certificate of Survey C. Annexation Boundary Map (excerpt from Annexation Agreement) 1 Legend Orderly Annexation Area City of Monticello Monticello Township Boundary A WSB & Associates, /nc. City Council Agenda: 02/13/17 4A. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2017-05 accepting the Feasibilitv Report, setting a public hearing for February 27, 2017 and set the residential reconstruction rate for the 2017 Street and Utilitv Improvement Proiect , City Proiect No. 16CO03 (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council authorized preparation of a Feasibility Report addressing street and utility improvements for the following roadways: • Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue and 901h Street (within City limits) • Mississippi Drive • Hart Boulevard • Sandberg Road, south of Chelsea Road Other improvements include: Fog seal or microsurfacing of the existing pathway along Gillard Avenue New pathway along the north side of CSAH 75 from Highland Way to the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) administrative office building access Watermain replacement along Hart Boulevard between CSAH 75 and the hospital parking area to improve maintenance of the system Property owner meetings were held for Gillard Avenue on December 8, 2016 and January 23, 2017. Property owner meetings for Mississippi Drive, Hart Boulevard and Sandberg Road were held on February 1, 2017. A Council work session was held on January 23, 2017 to discuss the Gillard Avenue street design and provide an overview of the entire project improvements, costs and assessments. Below is a description of each street improvement highlighting items that need further clarification based on comments from the January 23, 2017 Council workshop: Gillard Avenue At the January 23, 2017 Council meeting, it was decided to widen Gillard Avenue to 32 - feet wide and add curb and gutter to address safety concerns and meet City residential street design standards. It is proposed to widen Gillard Avenue on the east side of the roadway from 24 -feet wide to 32 -feet wide with curb and gutter. Driveway culverts will be replaced as needed and relocated and minor ditch grading will occur to accommodate the widening. The segment of Gillard Avenue north of River Forest Drive has an approximate 7.5% vertical downslope toward CSAH 39. Stopping sight distances were evaluated where this City Council Agenda: 02/13/17 steep grade exists given the concern related to vehicles exiting driveways and River Forest Drive onto Gillard Avenue. It is our engineering judgement that there is ample sight distance based upon MnDOT and AASHTO guidance. The two criterion used were: 1. Stopping Sight Distance — This is what is required on all roadways to ensure vehicles have enough time to make an evasive maneuver to avoid a crash. This sight distance is considered the absolute minimum, as it is not desirable to have motorists make an abrupt stop to avoid a conflict. The stopping sight distance (SSD) for 30 mph is 220 feet. 2. Intersection Sight Distance — This distance is based on the driver on the minor street being able to make a comfortable decision before pulling out into traffic on the major roadway. This is usually used for a major road and minor road, not particularly for a minor road and a driveway. For the purposes of this memo, it was used as a greater than needed expectation. The intersection sight distance (ISD) for 30 mph is 370 feet. Lowering the existing hill would create significant impacts including: approximately 500 feet of watermain and pathway replacement, reconstruction of 8 driveways along Gillard Avenue and significant grading and restoration costs. In addition, approximately 150 feet of street and utilities would need to the replaced on River Forest Drive. These additional costs total approximately $200,000 to $300,000 and the benefit may not justify the cost. More detail and graphics illustrating this is included in the Feasibility Report. It should be noted that the roadway will be lowered approximately 6 inches to accommodate curb construction, which will provide some benefit to the sight lines. Because of these impacts, it is not recommended to lower the hill any further. It is recommended to encourage residents to construct driveway turnarounds/hammer heads to eliminate the need to back out of their driveway as a safety measure. The fact that Gillard Avenue carries local traffic, where drivers should be familiar with the site conditions and slow down when vehicles are accessing driveways, is another factor to consider. Speed control can assist in improving the sight lines as well and the resident's concerns for high speeds. To address this, it is proposed to install 2 dynamic speed signs along the roadway, one in each direction. Wright County sheriff's department has been made aware of the speed concerns and are monitoring the area. It is anticipated to present data from them at the public hearing. To address the question of double fine zones, the State sets the fine amounts, not Wright County or the City and it would be unlikely that this could be revised if requested. Roadway striping and boulevard trees are also proposed to promote traffic calming. Improvements to the intersection of Gillard Avenue and CSAH 39 are being addressed under a separate report. 2 City Council Agenda: 02/13/17 95" Street, Haug Avenue, 901h Street, Mississippi Drive, Hart Boulevard, Sandberg Road In general, it is proposed to reclaim the existing pavement and underlying aggregate base and repave the remaining streets. Deteriorated curb, where applicable, will be replaced as needed. Drainage improvements are proposed along Mississippi Drive to replace existing draintile that is not functioning and add catch basins to facilitate improved drainage for the area. Al. Budget Impact: The improvements were included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. The estimated costs for the improvements total $2,272,860, which include a 10% contingency and 22% for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing costs. Assessments Sandberg Road $118,368 Hart Boulevard West $5,280 Hart Boulevard Watermain - Hart Boulevard East $159,648 Hart Boulevard Trail - Mississippi Drive $161,000 Gillard Avenue $87,400 95th Street - Haug Avenue $92,610 90t' Street $63,700 TOTAL $688,006 City Funds TOTAL - $118,368 $146,171 $151,452 $164,489 $164,489 $34,675 $194,323 $20,063 $20,063 $239,997 $400,997 $610,805 $698,205 $162,963 $162,963 $141,557 $234,167 $64,123 $127,823 $1,584,844 $2,272,850 I Assessments for the project are proposed to be based on the City's assessment policy for residential and non-residential properties as described below: 1. Increase the standard residential street reconstruction assessment rate to $4,600 per unit for 2017. 2. The Council could consider an additional $1,280 per lot assessment for the 19 City properties along Gillard Avenue for the inclusion of curb and gutter. The total assessment for each lot would be $5,880. This would increase the assessment total identified above by $24,320 for a total of $111,720 or 16% of 3 City Council Agenda: 02/13/17 the project being assessed. If the Council did not opt for this increase and maintained the $4,600 assessment per unit, $87,400 or 12.5% of the project cost would be assessed. 3. Assess non-residential properties at the actual front -foot street reconstruction rate. Funding for the proposed improvements will likely include a mix of funding sources including; special assessments to the benefitting properties and future street reconstruction and improvement bonds repaid by a debt service tax levy. The Finance Director will likely recommend during 2018 budget discussions that the debt/capital projects levy be held at levels consistent with prior years and used to provide upfront financing for the street reconstruction projects, other improvement projects and future debt service needs. A bonding reimbursement resolution will be presented for consideration as these projects will likely be included in the 2017 bond issue. A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff will prepare the necessary documents for the public hearing in accordance with state statutes. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution #2017-04 accepting the Feasibility Report, set a public hearing for February 27, 2017 and set the residential street reconstruction assessment rate at $4,600 per unit for the 2017 Street and Utility Improvement Project, City Project No. 16C003. 2. Motion to adopt Resolution #2017-04 accepting the Feasibility Report, set the public hearing for February 27, 2017 and set the residential street reconstruction assessment rate at $4,600 per unit, except for Gillard Avenue where the assessment rate would be set at $5,880 per unit for the 2017 Street and Utility Improvement Project, City Project No. 16C003 3. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #2017-04 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends moving forward with the project as noted under alternative 1 or 2. The subject roadways have deteriorated over time and are in need of repair and were included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. Regarding special assessments, by state statute, the amount of a special assessment cannot exceed the special benefit to the property as measured by increase in market value due to the improvement. The properties along Gillard Avenue may receive an increased benefit compared to other residential streets that already meet the City standard of being M City Council Agenda: 02/13/17 32 -feet wide with curb and gutter. Since the added curb represents an added benefit above simple reconstruction, the Finance Director believes that Council should consider increasing the assessment to $5,880 per alternative 2. It should be noted that similar road reconstruction projects, where the roadway is being widened with curb and gutter, such as Prairie Road and West River Street, were not assessed more than the City residential street reconstruction rate at the time in 2010. A good case can be made for selecting alternative 1 or 2. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution #2017-05 B. Feasibility Report 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-05 ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT, CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE 2017 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 16CO03 WHEREAS, approval was granted by the City Council authorizing the preparation of a feasibility report addressing street and utility improvements and other appurtenance work for: • Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue and 90th Street (within City limits) • Mississippi Drive • Hart Boulevard • Sandberg Road, south of Chelsea Road Other improvements include: • Fog seal or microsurfacing of the existing pathway along Gillard Avenue • New pathway along the north side of CSAH 75 from Highland Way to the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) administrative office building access • Watermain replacement along Hart Boulevard between CSAH 75 and the hospital parking area to improvement maintenance of the system NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBYRESOLPED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvements are necessary, cost-effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on February 27, 2017 in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 6:30 p.m. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this 13`h day of February, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Monti"ce-o IMPROVEMENT PROJECT City of Monticello Wright County, Minnesota City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello. MN 55362 FEASIBILITY REPORT 2017 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF MONTICELLO PROJECT NO. 16CO03 FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA February 13, 2017 Prepared By: WSB Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 ■ Aw 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541-4800 February 13, 2017 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Transmitted herewith is a feasibility report for the proposed 2017 Street Improvement Project. This report examines street and pathway improvements along Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, 90th Street, Mississippi Drive, Hart Boulevard, and Sandberg Road south of Chelsea Road. I would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please feel free to contact me at (763) 271-3236 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. IA�- - t&ssOpt- Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer Enclosure cc: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, City of Monticello Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, City of Monticello Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Eric M. Eckman, PE Date: February 13, 2017 License No. 49954 Quality Control Review Completed By: "" , Shibani K. Bison, PE Date: February 13, 2017 License No. 41860 Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16C003 WSB Project No. 2596-360 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE SHEET LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Authorization................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Scope.............................................................................................................................3 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS.....................................................................................................4 3.1 Streets............................................................................................................................4 3.1.1 Project Overview.............................................................................................. 4 3.1.2 Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 90th Street .............................. 6 3.1.3 Mississippi Drive............................................................................................10 3.1.4 Hart Boulevard...............................................................................................10 3.1.5 Sandberg Road................................................................................................12 3.2 Storm Sewer/Drainage................................................................................................12 3.2.1 Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 90th Street ............................12 3.2.2 Mississippi Drive, Hart Boulevard, and Sandberg Road................................13 3.3 Watermain...................................................................................................................13 3.4 Sanitary Sewer............................................................................................................13 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.........................................................................................15 4.1 Gillard Avenue............................................................................................................15 4.2 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 90th Street...................................................................19 4.3 Mississippi Drive........................................................................................................19 4.4 Hart Boulevard............................................................................................................ 20 4.5 Sandberg Road............................................................................................................21 4.6 Watermain Improvements...........................................................................................21 4.7 Stormwater Treatment................................................................................................ 22 4.8 CSAH 75 Pathway Improvements.............................................................................. 23 4.9 Private Utilities........................................................................................................... 23 4.10 Permits........................................................................................................................ 23 4.11 Rights-of-Way/Easements.......................................................................................... 23 5. FINANCING ..........................................................................................................................24 5.1 Opinion of Cost........................................................................................................... 24 5.2 Funding....................................................................................................................... 25 5.2.1 Assessments....................................................................................................25 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE.......................................................................................................29 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................30 Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Appendix A Figure 1 — Project Location Figures 2-3 — Gillard Avenue Improvements Figure 4 — Sandberg Road Improvements Figure 5 — 95th Street, Haug Avenue, & 90th Street Improvements Figure 6 — Hart Boulevard Improvements Figure 7 — Mississippi Drive Improvements Figures 8-10 — Typical Sections Appendix B Opinions of Probable Cost Appendix C Assessment Maps Assessment Rolls Appendix D Pavement Core Memo Appendix E Environmental Contamination Review — Area 1 Environmental Contamination Review — Area 2 Environmental Contamination Review — Area 3 Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Project No. 16CO03 consists of roadway improvements to the following roadways: • Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 90th Street (within City limits) • Mississippi Drive • Hart Boulevard • Sandberg Road south of Chelsea Road Other improvements include: • Fog seal or microsurface the existing pathway along Gillard Avenue • New pathway along the north side of CSAH 75 from Highland Way to the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) administrative office building • Watermain replacement along Hart Boulevard between CSAH 75 and the hospital parking area A project location map is included in Appendix A. The pavement sections along each of the roadways within the project area have varying levels of pavement distresses (i.e. cracking, potholes) and are in need of repair in order to extend their useful life. The streets were inspected and rated between 2011 and 2013 in accordance with the City's Pavement Management Program. Other considerations including previous repair history (i.e. patching, crack filling), roadway age, traffic volumes, roadway classification (i.e. local vs. collector), use, etc. were factors in determining the most cost-effective method to extend the life of the roadways. Based on the above considerations and the analysis of the pavement cores taken in November 2016, it is recommended to complete a full -depth pavement reclamation with new bituminous pavement placed on Sandberg Road, Mississippi Drive, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 90th Street, maintaining their current widths. Due to varying pavement conditions, segments of Hart Boulevard are proposed to receive a full - width mill and bituminous overlay or a full -depth pavement reclamation with new bituminous pavement placed. At the January 23, 2017, Council meeting, it was decided to widen Gillard Avenue to 32 feet wide and add curb and gutter to address safety concerns and meet City residential street design standards. Improvements to the intersection of Gillard Avenue and CSAH 39 are being addressed under a separate report. Informal meetings were held with property owners in the project areas of Gillard Avenue, Mississippi Drive, Hart Boulevard, and Sandberg Road to obtain feedback related to the proposed improvements and assessments. This report addresses the comments received. The total estimated project cost for the recommended improvements is $2,272,850. This cost includes a 10% contingency and 22% for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing costs. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16C003 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 1 Funding sources for the proposed improvements include special assessments to the adjacent property owners in order to reimburse a future bond issue to finance the project. This project is necessary, feasible, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint and can be constructed as proposed herein. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 2 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Authorization The preparation of this report was authorized by the City Council on October 24, 2016. This project is identified in the City's five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). This project has been designated as City Project No. 16C003. 2.2 Scope The scope of this feasibility report includes street improvements along the following roadways: • Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 90th Street (within City limits) • Mississippi Drive • Hart Boulevard • Sandberg Road south of Chelsea Road Other improvements include: • Fog seal or microsurface the existing pathway along Gillard Avenue • New pathway along the north side of CSAH 75 from Highland Way to the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) administrative office building • Watermain replacement along Hart Boulevard between CSAH 75 and the hospital parking area A map showing the project location can be found on Figure I in Appendix A. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 3 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Streets The existing streets within the proposed project area vary in width, length, and section type as identified below. Street Name Gillard Avenue 95th Street Haug Avenue 90th Street Mississippi Drive Hart Boulevard (West) Hart Boulevard (East) Sandberg Drive Table 1: Existing Roadway Information Length :Width (Edge of Bit) Section ROW Width 1,970' 24' Rural 100' 1,700' 22' Rural 73'-83' 2,600' _ 22' Rural _ 73' 1,300' 22' Rural 66' 2,010' 28' Urban 66' 1,025' = 33' Urban = 66' 11600 29'-32' Urban/Rural 66' 450' 42' Urban 60' 3. LI Project Overview Pavement Condition Public Works has continued to crack fill, fill potholes, and patch the roadways within the project area over the past several years. Public Works staff inspected all of the roadways in the project area between 2011 and 2013 and assigned a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to each segment of roadway using the City's Pavement Management Program (PMP) software. PCIs are a numerical index between 0 and 100 that indicate the condition of a pavement based on the various pavement distresses recorded during visual observations. A PCI value of 100 represents a pavement in brand new condition, while a PCI value of 0 to 30 represents a pavement section that has fallen into total disrepair requiring a complete reconstruction. The PMP evaluation process involves dividing the pavement surface into sections. The type, extent, and severity of the various pavement distresses noted within each section are then recorded. Numerous types of pavement distresses may exist within a pavement section including, but not limited to, alligator cracking, block cracking, longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking, rutting, raveling, shoving, potholes, and patches. Each type of distress observed receives a rating of low, medium, or high severity based on the extent of the distress noted. Once the field data is gathered, it is then processed using CarteGraph PMP software, which calculates an average PCI rating for each segment analyzed. This PCI value is used to determine the most cost-effective pavement rehabilitation method for each road segment. The resulting ratings are summarized in Table 2 on the following page. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 4 Table 2: Pavement Condition Index Ratings Street Name PCI Rating Year Rated Gillard Avenue 57.75-63.38 2011 95"' Street 37.39 ................................................. 2011 Haug Avenue 20.82-58.25 2011 90"' Street 58.24 2011 Mississippi Drive 48.74 2013 Hart Boulevard West 73.21 2013 Hart Boulevard East - Urban Section 37.82013 Hart Boulevard (E) Hart Boulevard East - Rural Section 23.452013 ............... Sandburg Drive 16.05 2013 These ratings are based on inspections completed between 2011 and 2013; since then, the roadways have deteriorated significantly. Inspection ratings are one factor in determining the pavement condition. Pavement cores were taken in early November 2016 throughout the project area to evaluate the integrity of the pavement. Fifteen pavement cores throughout the project area were taken to identify the depth of pavement, crack depth, and bonding characteristics and distresses that are not visible from the roadway surface. The coring results are summarized in Table 3 below. Core Street Name Number Thickness (in) 1 I 90th Street 2 Hau Avenue 3 Haug Avenue 4 95"' Street 5 95"' Street 6 Gillard Avenue 7 Gillard Avenue 8 Mississippi Drive 9 Mississippi Drive 10 Hart Boulevard (E) 11 Hart Boulevard (E) 12 Hart Boulevard (W) 13 Hart Boulevard (W) 14 Sandberg Road 15 Sandberg Road Table 3: Coring Results Bituminous Aggregate Base Subgrade Thickness (in) Thickness (in) Classification 6.1 8.0 SM 5.0 10.0 CL 5.3 10.5 CL 4.3 7.0 SP -SM 4.1 5.0 SP -SC 3.8 6.0 SP -SC 4.0 8.0 SP -SC 3.3 11.0 SP 4.4 9.0 OL 3.8 5.5 SP 4.5 7.5 SP -SC 5.9 7.5 SP 4.27.5 SP 5.5 N/A SP 3.9 N/A SP Details related to the pavement cores taken can be found in the Pavement Core Memo located in Appendix D. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16C003 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 5 Environmental Review A desktop contamination review was conducted for the project areas in November 2016. This consisted of using the MPCA and MDA "What's in My Neighborhood?" website searches. Based on the information in the databases for the project areas, there is one area where contaminated soil along Hart Boulevard (East) exists outside of the right-of- way. It is anticipated that this area will not be disturbed based on the proposed construction limits for this area and the information available. Separate memorandums describing the environmental review results can be found in Appendix E. 3.1.2 Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 9e Street Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 90th Street within the project limits were former Monticello Township roads that became City roads when adjacent properties were annexed for development. These roadways total approximately 7,600 feet and are 22 - foot -wide and 24 -foot -wide rural section roadways with adjacent ditch systems to convey drainage. The existing rights-of-way on these roadways range from 66 feet to 100 feet wide. Gillard Avenue was last reconstructed in 1995 with storm sewer installation. Public Works placed a thin bituminous overlay along Haug Avenue in 2015 as a temporary repair knowing that a more substantial street improvement was planned for the near future as part of the CIP. As shown in the photos below, there are various types of pavement distresses visible along each of these sections of roadway including longitudinal and latitudinal cracking, alligator cracking, block cracking, and pot holing. Gillard Avenue — County Road 39 to River Forest Drive Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 6 .r fir. �::��'==•'•..�_�?c'�: b .�� `•2H'l 1'..: � `•h��S� • 'tib.. �—' ' iii ��• :�• ..;• .. - �- ar K• ♦G •:rm..l.96S`��ii�''�i!?E.Se-.,=".��__..jfif:SYY��.�+1�t_'^}wA.t S ��y1�.. n5� i � - Haug Avenue - 95" Street to 9e Street 9e Street - Haug Avenue to City Limit Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 8 An 8 -foot -wide bituminous trail exists along the western side of Gillard Avenue between 95th Street and River Forest Drive that was constructed in 2002. A 4- to 5 -foot boulevard exists between the trail and the roadway edge where turf is not established. Gillard Avenue Trail An 8 -foot -wide bituminous trail exists along the south side of 95th Street between Gillard Avenue and Haug Avenue along the Sunset Ponds park, and was constructed with the Sunset Ponds development. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 9 3.1.3 Mississippi Drive Mississippi Drive was originally constructed in 1977 within the existing 60 -foot -wide right-of-way. It was reconstructed in 1989 in order to improve drainage and correct subgrade issues due to the elevated springs in the adjacent hill area. The roadway was chip sealed in 1993. The existing 28 -foot -wide pavement section consists of 3.5-4.5 inches of bituminous over 9-11 inches of aggregate base with surmountable curb along the entire length. Mississippi Drive — County Road 39 to Cul-de-sac 3.1.4 Hart Boulevard Hart Boulevard was originally constructed between 1988 and 1989 with pavement widths ranging between 32 feet and 35 feet. Hart Boulevard West adjacent to the WWTP has B618 curb and gutter for the entire length, and Hart Boulevard East between CSAH 75 and CSAH 39 has B618 curb and gutter and from the intersection with CSAH 75 and Highland Way to the east approximately 715 feet. The curbed section of Hart Boulevard East was installed in 1998 with the CSAH 75 median improvement project. The remaining 885 feet of Hart Boulevard East to CSAH 39 currently is a rural section without curb and gutter. The existing right-of-way widths on these roadways range from 60 feet to 66 feet. The Mississippi River Trail Bikeway (MRT) extends along Hart Boulevard as an on -road bicycle trail between CSAH 39 and CSAH 75. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 10 As shown in the photos below, there are various types of pavement distresses visible along each of these sections of roadway including longitudinal and latitudinal cracking, alligator cracking, block cracking, and pot holing. Hart Boulevard - County Road 75 to Hospital Parking Lot Hart Boulevard - County Road 75 to County Road 39 Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 11 3.1.5 Sandberg Road Sandberg Road was originally constructed in 1978 within the existing 60 -foot -wide right- of-way. The 44 -foot -wide pavement section consists of 4-5.5 inches of bituminous over poorly graded sand base with surmountable type D concrete curb and gutter. As shown in the photo below the existing pavement is severely deteriorated due to age and general deterioration over time due to heavy truck use and parking. Sandberg Road — South of Chelsea Road 3.2 Storm Sewer/Drainage 3.2.1 Gillard Avenue, 95"i Street, Haug Avenue, and 9e Street Drainage ditches exist along both sides of the roadway along Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 90th Street to convey stormwater runoff within the public right-of-way and drainage and utility easements. Gillard Avenue currently has a series of drainage culverts located on the both sides of the roadway as well as a number of bituminous swales directing runoff away from the street. A trunk storm sewer line was constructed along Gillard Avenue, City Project No. 93- 12C, known as the Meadow Oak trunk sewer line. This system accommodates drainage south of I-94 and north of I-94 along Gillard Avenue and drains across CSAH 39 directly to the Mississippi River. Erosion issues exist within the ditches along Gillard Avenue between River Forest Drive and CSAH 39. Public Works installed bituminous swales as a temporary measure, directing runoff from Gillard Avenue to the ditches to mitigate the erosion issues. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16C003 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 12 The culvert under 90th Street was found to be cracked and plugged and is proposed to be replaced with the project. 3.2.2 Mississippi Drive, Hart Boulevard, and Sandberg Road Existing storm sewer along Mississippi Drive, Hart Boulevard, and Sandberg Road within the project area consists of catch basins and reinforced concrete pipe, which convey drainage into adjacent storm sewer systems. According to City records, approximately 850 feet of PVC drain tile was installed in 1990 along a portion of the southern side of Mississippi Drive to accommodate drainage from a natural spring in the hill approximately 1,500 feet from County Road 39. This line has been impacted by tree roots and lack of maintenance over the past 27 years and is in need of repair. 3.3 Watermain The watermain system along Gillard Avenue consists of 8 -inch ductile iron pipe (DIP) with approximately 8 to 10 feet of cover along the boulevard and ditch. This watermain was installed in 1990 and connects the adjacent developments and a 12 -inch watermain along CSAH 39. There are no existing watermains along 95th Street east of Gillard Avenue, Haug Avenue, or 90th Street. Watermain facilities beneath Mississippi Drive and Sandberg Road consist of 8 -inch and 10 -inch DIP, respectively, which were installed in 1977. Hart Boulevard West watermain facilities consist of 750 feet of 6 -inch DIP, which connects to adjacent 12 -inch DIP on the edge of the hospital parking lot to the west, and 12 -inch DIP approximately 350 feet west of the intersection with CSAH 75. Watermain facilities along Hart Boulevard East consist of a 12 -inch DIP trunk line within the boulevard between Hart Boulevard and CSAH 75, as well as an 8 -inch DIP line connecting at the intersection with CSAH 39 Discussions with Public Works staff indicated the watermain facilities within the project area are functioning adequately and are not in need of repair with the exception of the 6 -inch portion of watermain along Hart Boulevard West that is currently undersized and is addressed in the proposed improvements section in this report. 3.4 Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system along Gillard Avenue consists of 8 -inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe, which was installed in 1990 along the boulevard and ditch. This pipe collects flow from the adjacent developments and connects to the 10 -inch trunk sewer along CSAH 39. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 13 Similar to watermain, sanitary sewer facilities do not exist along 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 90th Street. Mississippi Drive and Sandberg Road both have 10 -inch PVC sanitary pipe along their entire lengths. Hart Boulevard West has sanitary sewer facilities consisting of a 24 -inch PVC trunk line within the boulevard between Hart Boulevard and CSAH 75. Existing sanitary facilities along Hart Boulevard East consist of a 24 -inch PVC trunk line within the boulevard along CSAH 75, as well as an 8 -inch PVC line along a portion of the roadway. Discussions with Public Works staff indicated the sanitary sewer along Mississippi Drive is in need of spot repairs and all of the sanitary manholes located in the street within the project area are in need of ring and/or casting replacements. The casting and ring replacements will be included as part of this project. The spot repairs will be included with other spot lining work throughout the City under a separate project. The costs for the spot repairs are not included in this report. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 14 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Street and utility improvement layouts and typical sections for each project area are included in Appendix A. 4.1 Gillard Avenue Traffic Analysis A traffic analysis was completed documenting the existing traffic conditions alonGillard Avenue and projecting future traffic conditions with and without the proposed 95t Street extension. Existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT), AM peak hour, and PM peak hour volumes were collected the week of January 18, 2016. Turning movement counts were also collected at the intersections of Gillard Avenue and CR 39, Gillard Avenue, and River Forest Drive and Gillard Avenue at 95th Street. Based on the existing traffic counts the following was concluded: • Existing (2016) ADT on Gillard Avenue is between 1,620 and 1,850 vehicles per day (vpd). Previous traffic counts were conducted in 2001 on Gillard Avenue. Those counts ranged from 1,050 to 1,200. The primary reason for the increase over the 15 -year period is the development of the Sunset Ponds area. • 85% to 90% of the traffic entering or exiting CR 39 at Gillard Avenue has an origin or destination in the City of Monticello (i.e. left turning from Gillard Avenue to CR 39 or right turn from CR 39 to Gillard Avenue). • Traffic on Gillard Avenue is not using River Forest Drive as a cut -through avoiding the CR 39 intersection. • Currently, there is not significant traffic generation impacting Gillard Avenue from the area east of the Sunset Ponds development. A typical local residential City street has traffic volumes up to 1,200 vpd. Traffic volumes higher than 1,200 vpd are typical for collector type streets. Traffic capacity of a two-lane roadway is up to 5,000 vpd depending on the topography, locations of driveways and streets intersecting the roadway, condition of the roadway, rural or urban cross-section, and speed of traffic. Considering Gillard Avenue is in need of pavement rehabilitation, the existing traffic volume of 1,620 vpd to 1,850 vpd is approaching a critical level. However, if the roadway was improved with pavement rehabilitation, possible addition of curb and gutter, etc., the critical level could be in the range of 2,000 vpd to 2,500 vpd. Comparable City streets with similar traffic volumes are: • Broadway east of CR 18/39 — 2,050 vpd • Fenning Avenue south of School Boulevard — 1,800 vpd • Fallon Avenue south of Chelsea Road — 1,750 vpd • Street north of 7th Avenue — 1,450 vpd • Innsbrook Drive south of Chelsea Road —1,850 vpd (estimated — no counts have been taken) • Prairie Road — 1,500 vpd (estimated — no counts have been taken) Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16C003 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 15 Street Design A neighborhood meeting was held on December 8, 2016, to discuss the proposed improvements to Gillard Avenue. Based on the comments from the meeting, the project goals for Gillard Avenue are to address speeding, vehicle and pedestrian safety, and the street design. Several alternatives were evaluated to address these goals for Gillard Avenue and include the following: • Widen the roadway to the City residential street standard of 32 feet with curb and gutter and parking on one site of the roadway • Widen the roadway to a 28 -foot width with curb and gutter and no parking • Maintain the existing width and add curb and gutter between River Forest Drive and CSAH 39 to address erosion issues • Cutting down the hill at the River Forest Drive intersection to improve sight lines • Filling in existing ditches • Encourage property owners to construct driveway turnarounds/hammer heads • Provide mailboxes on both sides of Gillard Avenue, subject to Post Office determination • Stripe the roadway with centerline and edge striping to channel vehicles to remain in the through lane as a traffic calming method • Provide boulevard trees as a traffic calming method Below is a more detailed description of the above alternatives. An alternative to widen the roadway equally on both sides to a 32 -foot width including curb and gutter while maintaining the existing trail is not feasible without completely replacing the existing trail. The trail is not in need of reconstruction; therefore, this option would incur additional expense. It is proposed to widen the roadway entirely on the east side, as there will be minimal property impacts, which would include culvert replacements and some minor ditch grading work. Lowering the roadway and filling in the existing ditches would be costly to maintain positive drainage from the adjacent yards to the proposed curb and is not recommended given the cost benefit. The segment of Gillard Avenue north or River Forest Drive has an approximate 7.5% vertical downslope toward CSAH 39. Stopping sight distances were evaluated where this steep grade exists given the concern related to vehicles exiting driveways and River Forest Drive onto Gillard Avenue. It is our engineering judgement that there is ample sight distance based upon MnDOT and AASHTO guidance. The two criterion used were: Stopping Sight Distance — This is what is required on all roadways to ensure vehicles have enough time to make an evasive maneuver to avoid a crash. This sight distance is considered the absolute minimum, as it is not desirable to have motorists make an abrupt stop to avoid a conflict. The stopping sight distance (SSD) for 30 mph is 220 feet. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16C003 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 16 2. Intersection Sight Distance — This distance is based on the driver on the minor street being able to make a comfortable decision before pulling out into traffic on the major roadway. This is usually used for a major road and minor road, not particularly for a minor road and a driveway. For the purposes of this report, it was used as a greater than needed expectation. The intersection sight distance (ISD) for 30 mph is 370 feet. Lowering the existing hill would create significant impacts including approximately 500 feet of watermain and pathway replacement, reconstruction of eight driveways along Gillard Avenue, and significant grading and restoration costs. In addition, approximately 150 feet of street and utilities would need to be replaced on River Forest Drive. These additional costs total approximately $200,000 to $300,000 and the benefit may not justify the cost. More detail and graphics illustrating this is included in the feasibility report. It should be noted that the roadway will be lowered approximately 6 inches to accommodate curb construction, which will provide some benefit to the sight lines. Because of these impacts, it is not recommended to lower the hill any further. The impact area is shown on Figure 3 in Appendix A. It is recommended to encourage residents to construct driveway turnarounds/hammer heads to eliminate the need to back out of their driveway as a safety measure. The fact that Gillard Avenue carries local traffic, where drivers should be familiar with the site conditions and slow down when vehicles are accessing driveways, is another factor to consider. Recommended improvements to Gillard Avenue include the following: • Widen the roadway on the east side to 32 feet wide with barrier style concrete curb and gutter • Shift the current centerline of the roadway to allow for a 6 -foot -wide boulevard along the existing trail on the west side • Allow on -street parking on the west side • Stripe the centerline, shoulder, and parking lane • Install boulevard trees A 32 -foot -wide roadway with curb and gutter provides a barrier to the adjacent properties and pathway for improved safety. It also provides a wider area for turning and driveway access maneuvers, accommodates parking on one side of the roadway, meets City design standards for residential streets, and accommodates emergency and maintenance vehicles Similar examples of rural collector roadways reconstructed to urban sections include Prairie Road and River Street west of Chestnut Street. Pathwav Improvements The trail on the west side of Gillard Avenue is currently in adequate condition and is not in need of major repair. It is recommended that a crack fill and fog seal be performed on the length of the trail in order to extend the useful life of the trail. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 17 Speed Control Speed data was collected as shown in the table below. The 85th percentile speed was 36 mph. The posted speed limit is 30 mph, which is the statutory speed by law. Date of Sample Direction 5/24/10- 5/26/10 SB 7/11/11- 7/15/11 SB 9/14/15- 9/17/15 5S Speed 76% Sample 5/23/16 - 5/27/16 5P 9/8/15-9/11/15 N& 12/1/16- 12/6/16 NB 10 NTH Pace [mph] % in Pace Average Speed 85th Percentile 23 33 81% 27.9 33 25 34 76% 27.7 33 25 34 80% 27.57 32 25 34 76% 28.53 33 26 35 77.95% 29.31 34 27 36 71.69% 31.19 36 Enforcement is the primary method to control speeds in the area and it is recommended to continue this effort. Driver Feedback signs are another method as described below. Driver Feedback (Dynamic Speed) signs measure the speed of the approaching vehicles and then feed this information back to the driver in real time via a dynamic message display. Portable devices (a.k.a. speed trailers) have been shown to be an effective engineering countermeasure for short-term speed control. However, experience has shown that as soon as the device is removed, speeds soon return to their previous levels. Studies of the long-term installation of Driver Feedback signs as a speed management tool found that: 1. These signs are effective for reducing and managing speeds resulting in: a. Speed reductions of 6-8 mph in the 85th percentile s speed IMUR 1� SPEED, b. Decrease of 10 mph in the 10 mph Pace c. Consistent reductions through all time frames including the 24-hour data, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour d. Consistent shift in the speed distribution to lower speeds 2. These signs have a persistent and sustained effect on driver speed behavior making them an effective engineering tool for reducing and managing driver ........... speed. 3. The effectiveness of the signs proved extremely popular with drivers, nearby residents, and businesses, as well as resulted in positive feedback to public and elected officials. The installation of two signs (northbound and southbound) on Gillard Avenue would range in cost from $6,500 to $12,000 depending on the power source. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 18 It is proposed to install Driver Feedback signs halfway between 97th Street and River Forest Drive. Three-way stop signs at Gillard Avenue and 97th Street and/or at River Forest Drive are not recommended given that the situation does not meet stop sign warrants based on traffic volumes for each street. A false sense of security with drivers not stopping due to low opposing traffic can be created, and conversely, if a driver does stop, usually an increase in speed occurs after stopping. Studies have proved that stop signs are not a feasible method to control speeds. Stormwater Improvements Existing storm sewer facilities along Gillard Avenue currently consist of a series of reinforced concrete pipes and structures extending the full length of the roadway, as well as numerous drainage culverts along the east and west sides of the roadway. Storm sewer improvements would consist of adding catch basins structures between County Road 39 and 95th Avenue, which will be connected to the existing manholes along Gillard Avenue. The addition of the curb and gutter and catch basins will eliminate the roadway drainage entering the ditches on either side of Gillard Avenue and will significantly reduce the existing erosion issues along the roadway, making it possible to eliminate the existing bituminous swales through this area. 4.2 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 90th Street Street Design Each of these streets is currently 22 feet wide bituminous pavement with gravel shoulders. Proposed improvements include maintaining the existing 22 -foot width, reclaiming the existing pavement, repaving the streets, and re -instating 2 -foot -wide gravel shoulders on each side of the roadway using excess reclaim material. Stormwater Improvements The existing drainage ditches and culverts are working adequately, without any known issues, with the exception of the existing 15 -inch drainage culvert beneath 90th Street, which currently is cracked and plugged, creating drainage backups in the roadway after major rainfall events. The culvert is proposed to be replaced with a 24 -inch pipe to alleviate this issue. 4.3 Mississippi Drive A neighborhood meeting was held on February 1, 2017, to discuss the proposed improvements to Mississippi Drive. Based on the comments from the meeting, the project goals for Mississippi Drive are to improve drainage within the roadway and address the need for containing the water coming from the spring in the hill on the south side of the roadway and preventing sand and sediment from being deposited on the roadway. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 19 Street Design Mississippi Drive is currently 30 feet wide from face -of -curb to face -of -curb from County Road 39 to the cul-de-sac. Improvements to Mississippi Street include maintaining the existing width, reclaiming the existing pavement, and repaving the street. The existing surmountable curb and gutter will remain in place, except for any panels needing repair and replacement, to restore the existing flow line and grade where the curb has settled, or where utility work will require the curb to be removed and replaced. Spot repairs will receive a full -depth saw cut to minimize disruption to the curb adjacent to the repair area. Stormwater Improvements Storm sewer facilities along Mississippi Drive are working adequately, with the exception of the existing drain tile along the south side of the roadway and the lack of grade on the existing roadway on the west end near the cul-de-sac. Discussions with Public Works staff indicate that the existing drain tile is not functioning as intended. Therefore, it is proposed to abandon the existing drain tile and install new 6 -inch drain tile along the south side of the roadway. Catch basins will also be added on the west end of the project to help facilitate better drainage for the area. 4.4 Hart Boulevard A neighborhood meeting was held on February 1, 2017, to discuss the proposed improvements to Hart Boulevard. Based on the comments from the meeting, the project goal for Hart Boulevard is to improve the existing condition of the roadway. The residents did not indicate that there were any drainage concerns along the roadway. Comments were related to widening the curve by Liberty Bank as well as maintaining access for the properties during construction. Street Design Hart Boulevard East is currently 32 feet wide from face -of -curb to face -of -curb from CSAH 75 to approximately 650 feet east, and 32 feet wide without curb and gutter from that point until the intersection with CSAH 39. Improvements to Hart Boulevard East are proposed to include maintaining the existing street widths, rehabilitating the section with curb with a 2 -inch mill and overlay, reclaiming the existing pavement and repaving for the rural section to the east, and to keep the existing B618 curb in place with the exception of any panels needing replacement. An option was considered to extend B618 curb and gutter for the full length of Hart Boulevard between CSAH 75 and CSAH 39 in order to improve drainage through this area and to provide a consistent road section between CSAH 75 and CSAH Road 39. However, this option is not recommended based on relatively lower traffic volumes on the roadway, no known parking or safety issues, and the drainage ditches are functioning and not creating erosion or maintenance issues. The roadway would need to be lowered significantly in order to fill in the ditches to create positive drainage from the adjacent properties to the curb line. This option would be costly and likely not be beneficial given the cost. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 20 Improvements to the MRT bike route along Hart Boulevard East are proposed to include additional striping for a 5 -foot -wide bike lane along the full length between CSAH 75 and CSAH 39. Hart Boulevard West is currently 36 feet wide from face -of -curb to face -of -curb from County Road 75 to the hospital parking lot, with B618 curb and gutter along the full length. The proposed improvements to Hart Boulevard West include maintaining the existing street width, reclaiming the existing pavement and replacing with new bituminous pavement for the length of the proposed watermain improvement. The remainder of the street will be improved with a 2 - inch mill and overlay. Stormwater Improvements There are no known issues with the existing storm sewer pipe system, as it appears to be working adequately. It is recommended to replace the rings on all of the catch basins and install I/I barriers as part of this project. 4.5 Sandberg Road Street Design A neighborhood meeting was held on February 1, 2017, to discuss the proposed improvements to Sandberg Road. The property owners that were in attendance agreed that the road was in need of the proposed improvements. No drainage concerns were brought up during the meeting. Sandberg Road is currently 44 feet wide from face -of -curb to face -of -curb throughout the project area and provides on -street parking on both sides of the roadway. Improvements to Sandberg Road are proposed to include maintaining the 42 -foot pavement width, removing the existing pavement, excavating 4.5 inches of material, replacing with 6 inches of aggregate base, repaving with 2 inches of bituminous base and 2 inches of bituminous wear, and to keep the existing surmountable curb in place, except for any panels needing replacement. Stormwater Improvements There are no known issues with the existing storm sewer pipe system, as it appears to be working adequately. It is recommended to replace the rings on all of the catch basins and install I/I barriers as part of this project. 4.6 Watermain Improvements Watermain improvements are proposed to include facilities along Hart Boulevard West between CSAH 75 and the hospital parking lot. The existing watermain is 6 -inch DIP for the majority of this section of Hart Boulevard, with 12 -inch DIP watermain extending to the east and west on either side. Improvements are proposed to include removing the existing 750 feet of 6 -inch pipe and replacing with 12 -inch pipe to connect to the existing 12 -inch pipe on either side. These improvements are needed to improve maintenance and operational flows of the system and are proposed to be made in conjunction with the Hart Boulevard East roadway improvements Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 21 proposed within this report. A watermain stub will be added to the right-of-way line for future connection to the adjacent Bondhus property. 4.7 Stormwater Treatment With the exception of Gillard Avenue, the project primarily includes reconstructing existing urban streets with existing storm sewer systems. Unlike new developments, which would provide stormwater catch basins, pipes, and stormwater ponds to provide flood control and water treatment, reconstruction projects require a more creative approach for stormwater management. It is the City's practice that reconstruction projects incorporate stormwater treatment systems where feasible. In the past, water quality has been provided by grading new ponds or expanding existing ponds, grading drainage swales, and installing sump manholes or "stormceptor" manholes. The current management of stormwater in this section of the City utilizes storm sewer to route and discharge stormwater runoff directly into the Mississippi River. Flooding or ponding of surface water due to rainfall events is not significantly problematic in this area. This project as proposed will result in a small new net increase in impervious surface area. This project will trigger the threshold to obtain a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Construction General Permit (CGP). This project will require the development of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that will require the integration of permanent stormwater management for the increase in impervious surface area that is 1 acre or greater. The SWPPP also requires the development of controls to prevent erosion, construction waste management, and hazardous materials management. The permanent stormwater management for the increase in impervious surface area of 1 acre or greater is to provide a water quality volume of 1 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces. For this project, there is limited space to provide permanent stormwater management. The MPCA CGP states, "For work on linear projects with lack of right-of-way where the Permittee(s) cannot obtain an easement or other permission for property needed to install treatment systems capable of treating the entire water quality volume on site, the Permittee(s) must maximize the water quality volume that can be treated prior to discharge to surface waters. Treatment can be provided through other methods or combination of methods such as grassed swales, filtration systems, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, prior to discharge to surface waters. A reasonable attempt must be made to obtain right-of-way during the project planning process. Documentation of these attempts must be in the SWPPP per Part III.A.5.m. in the section addressing infeasibility." The goal will be to provide permanent stormwater management to the maximum extent practical given the right-of-way constraints. For other areas, the City will need to consider the installation of sump manholes to minimize their off-site impacts and as a part of the City of Monticello's Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 22 4.8 CSAH 75 Pathway Improvements Currently, there is an existing footpath along the north side of CSAH 75 between Highland Way and the entrance to the WWTP. A pathway connection is proposed in this location filling in a gap between the on -road facility along Hart Boulevard East and West. The service drive adjacent to the WWTP is being utilized as a bicycle and pedestrian pathway. Existing and Proposed Pathway along County Road 75 4.9 Private Utilities A Gopher State One Call will be completed to identify the utilities that are in the vicinity of, and adjacent to, the project area. A utility coordination meeting will be held prior to construction to discuss any impact of the proposed improvements. 4.10 Permits This project will disturb more than 1 acre; therefore, a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit will be required. This will result in a need for a stormwater management plan and weekly inspections during construction to ensure no sediment is leaving the project site. 4.11 Rights-of-Way/Easements It is anticipated that all work will take place within the existing roadway right-of-way or within existing drainage and utility easements. Additional right-of-way or easement needs are not anticipated to construct the project as proposed. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16C003 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 23 5. FINANCING 5.1 Opinion of Cost A detailed opinion of probable cost for the proposed improvements can be found in Appendix B of this report. These opinions of probable cost incorporate anticipated 2017 construction costs and include a 10% construction contingency and 22% indirect costs. The indirect costs include legal, engineering, administrative, and financing items. A summary table of the proposed project costs is shown below in Table 4. The estimated project cost as proposed within this report totals $2,272,850. TABLE 4: Proposed Project Costs Street Name Improvement Type Cost Sandberg Road Street Improvements $118,368 :Street Improvements $151,452 Hart Boulevard West Watermain Improvements = $164,489 SUBTOTAL $315,941 Street Improvements = $194,323 Hart Boulevard East Trail Improvements = $20,063 SUBTOTAL $214,386 :Street Improvements = $321,425 Mississippi Drive :Utility Improvements $79,573 SUBTOTAL $400,997 :Street Improvements = $594,770 Gillard Avenue Utility Improvements = $103,435 SUBTOTAL $698,205 95`h Street Street Improvements = $162,963 Haug Avenue Street Improvements = $234,167 90`h Street Street and Drainage Improvements $127,823 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,272,850 Additional options were considered for improvements to Hart Boulevard East, as well as Gillard Avenue, as described previously in this report. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 24 5.2 Funding 5.2.1 Assessments A portion of the project costs is proposed to be recovered through assessments levied against benefiting properties in the project area. Assessments are proposed to be collected for surface improvements against residential lots and non-residential lots in the project areas. These assessments are described below, and a summary is shown below in Tables 5 and 6. Residential Assessments The residential assessment is a per lot assessment for the general improvement work to the roadways within the project area. In general, any residential property with access to a street being improved is proposed to be assessed as one residential unit. Assessments are based on the City's standard residential assessment rate for previously completed street reconstruction projects with an approximate annual increase of 2.22% due to estimates of construction cost index increases. This results in a proposed rate of $4,600 per residential unit/dwelling for 2017 (the rate in 2016 was $4,500 per unit). Two -dwelling homes or duplexes are assessed $4,600 per dwelling or $9,200. As has been the case in the past, assessments will be applied based on the current use of the property at the time the improvements are made. However, if the use of the property changes in the future, the assessment would be re-evaluated at the time based on a 30 - year pavement life, not including additional interest costs. Areas that include residential assessments at the rate described above include: • Mississippi Drive (35 units) • Hart Boulevard (West) (3 units) • Gillard Avenue (19 units) Monticello Township properties fronting Gillard Avenue are not proposed to be assessed since these properties are not within the City limits. The reconstruction rates in the preliminary assessment roll for Gillard Avenue do not include an additional assessment for the proposed curb and gutter. An additional $1,280 could be assessed per unit for the 19 properties along Gillard Avenue if the Council chooses to assess this cost. The total assessment for these lots would be $5,880. This would increase the assessment total identified above by $24,320. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 25 Non-residential Assessments There are several non-residential properties in the project areas. Non-residential lots are proposed to be assessed for street reconstruction at a front foot rate for Sandberg Road, Haug Avenue, 90th Street, and Hart Boulevard (East), respectively. These rates are based on assessing 100% of the per foot cost for the each project area, which is consistent with past practice. The mill and overlay areas are proposed to be assessed by the front foot rate with assessing 50% of the project cost. Only 50% of the project is proposed to be assessed due to the fact that there are properties fronting only one side of the roadway These rates will be based on the actual non-residential rates after construction is completed. However, there are several non-residential properties throughout the project that staff and the City attorney would recommend be assessed as follows: • The assessments for the Macarlund Plaza townhomes located on a private drive but with access from Hart Boulevard (East) are proposed to be distributed equally and individually per unit based on the frontage on Hart Boulevard. • The current residential property use (#52) along Hart Boulevard (East) is proposed to be assessed 50% of the proposed mill and overlay rate. If the property is rezoned or redevelops prior to any future street improvements, it is proposed to assess the property the remaining 50% of the assessment. The current residential property uses (#9/10 and #11) along Hart Boulevard (West) are proposed to be assessed 50% of the proposed mill and overlay rate, instead of the reconstruction rate. Due to the watermain upsizing, the roadway needs to be reconstructed. If the watermain did not need to be upsized, this section of roadway would only be in need of a mill and overlay improvement. Citv Pronertv and Pathwav Assessments The City currently owns six properties, which include the wastewater treatment facility and adjacent administrative facility along Hart Boulevard (West), two properties along Mississippi Drive and the adjacent Swan Park, as well as one property along Gillard Avenue for a trail connection, that are not included in the assessment calculations. The assessment for these properties totals $42,752 and is not included in the assessment totals noted in Table 5 on the following page. The proposed pathway along CSAH 75 connection Hart Boulevard is not proposed to be assessed to the adjacent properties as this poses a regional benefit for City's pathway system. The preliminary assessment rolls and accompanying maps for each project area are included in Appendix C. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16C003 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 26 Street Sandberg Road Hart Boulevard (West) Hart Boulevard (East) Hart Boulevard (East) Hart Boulevard (East) Mississippi Drive Gillard Avenue Haug Avenue TABLE 5: Preliminary Assessments Type of Rate No. of Front = Total Assessment Units Footage Non-residential $137/FF 864 $118,368 Residential $1,760/Unit 3 $5,280 Residential Town $400/Unit 30 $12,000 Home Mill & Overlay $1 760/Unit Multi -family & $44/FF 1 611 $31,088 Non-residential Reconstruction Multi -family & $80/FF 1,457 $116,560 Non-residential Residential $4,600/Unit 35 $161,000 Residential $4,600/Unit* 19 $87,400 Non-residential $45/FF 2,058 $92,610 90th Street Non-residential $49/FF 1,300 $63,700 TOTAL** $688,006 FF = front foot * The preliminary assessment roll for Gillard Avenue does not include an additional assessment for the proposed curb and gutter. An additional $1,280 could be assessed per unit for the 19 properties along Gillard Avenue if the Council chooses to assess this cost. ** Does not include City -owned properties totaling $42,752. Funding sources for the proposed improvements include special assessments to adjacent property owners along the proposed streets to be improved and a future bond issue to finance the project. The future bond proceeds will be reimbursed with the assessments paid by the property owners and future debt service levies. Properties fronting the south side of 95th Street and west side of Haug Avenue are not being considered to be assessed as these properties do not have direct access to the roadways and consist of rear -yard frontages. Funds from this development (Sunset Ponds) for future improvements to 95th Street and Haug Avenue were collected at the time the development was originally constructed. It is recommended that any parcels currently in the Township be assessed at the proposed rate at the time the parcels are annexed into the City boundary. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 27 A summary of the proposed funding is presented in Table 6. TABLE 6: Proposed Project Funding II Assessments City Funds Sandberg Road $118,368 = - Hart Boulevard West $5,280 $146,171 Hart Boulevard Watermain - _ $164,489 Hart Boulevard East $159,648 = $34,675 Hart Boulevard Trail - $20,063 Mississippi Drive $161,000 = $239,997 Gillard Avenue $87,400 = $610,805 95' Street - $162,963 Haug Avenue $92,610 $141,557 90th Street $63,700 = $64,123 F TAL $688,006 $1,584,844 Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16C003 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Total $118,368 $151,452 $164,489 $194,323 $20,063 $400,997 $698,205 $162,963 $234,167 $127,823 $2,272,850 J Page 28 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE The proposed schedule is as follows: Phase 1— Feasibilitv Report City Council Authorizes Feasibility Study ......................................................October 24, 2016 City Council Accepts Feasibility Report and Sets Public Hearing Date.................................................................. February 13, 2017 City Council Holds Public Hearing/Orders Project/ Authorizes Preparation of Plans and Specifications ................................ February 27, 2017 Phase 2 — Final Design Final Design.................................................................................................March April 2017 City Council Approves Plans and Specifications and Authorizes Advertisement for Bids..................................................................... April 2017 OpenBids.................................................................................................................... May 2017 City Council Awards Contract............................................................................May/June 2017 Phase 3 — Construction Preconstruction Meeting............................................................................................. June 2017 Begin Construction............................................................................................. June/July 2017 Final Completion.............................................................................................. September 2017 Assessment Hearing...............................................................................................October 2017 Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 29 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS City Project No. 16CO03 consists of street and utility improvements along Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, 90th Street, Mississippi Drive, Hart Boulevard, and Sandberg Road. It is the recommendation of City staff that City Project No. 16CO03 is feasible, necessary, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint. It is recommended to accept this feasibility report and call for a public hearing for the project in accordance with state statutes. The following improvements are recommended: 1. Gillard Avenue: • Widen the roadway on the east side to 32 feet wide with barrier style concrete curb and gutter • Shift the current centerline of the roadway to allow for a 6 -foot -wide boulevard along the existing trail on the west side • Allow on -street parking on the west side • Stripe the centerline, shoulder, and parking lane • Install boulevard trees • Install the driver feedback signs halfway between 97th Street and River Forest Drive • Fog seal or microsurface the existing pathway along Gillard Avenue 2. 95th Street, Haug Avenue, 90th Street, Mississippi Drive, and Sandberg Road: Reclaim the existing pavement and underlying aggregate base and repave the remaining streets. Deteriorated curb, where applicable, will be replaced as needed. • Improve drainage conditions as needed 3. Hart Boulevard: Improve segments of Hart Boulevard with a full -width mill and bituminous overlay or a full -depth pavement reclamation with new bituminous pavement placed, depending on existing pavement condition 4. Construct anew 10 -foot -wide pathway along the north side of CSAH 75 from Highland Way to the WWTP administrative office building. 5. Replace the watermain along Hart Boulevard between CSAH 75 and the hospital parking area to improve maintenance and operational flow of the system. 6. Increase the standard residential street reconstruction assessment rate to $4,600 per unit for 2017. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16C003 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 30 7. Consider an additional $1,280 per lot assessment for the 19 City properties along Gillard Avenue for the inclusion of curb and gutter. The total assessment for these lots would be $5,880. This would increase the assessment total identified above by $24,320. 8. Assess non-residential properties at the actual front -foot street reconstruction rate. Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Page 31 Figure 1 Figures 2-3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figures 8-10 Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 APPENDIX A — Project Location — Gillard Avenue Improvements — Sandberg Road Improvements — 95th Street, Haug Avenue, & 90th Street Improvements — Hart Boulevard Improvements — Mississippi Drive Improvements — Typical Sections ��, ir,,,, vi/ /iiia �iiir; •.v � •41 / m1 .% 0, � .QW/Aft,71 11'I:`Il�j i.w, #I1u1low 11± 1111��►�.� �� to1►` —� I71111111f1� �� 71111 1111�� yrrrrr ��11111111—No I 3M I�) IIIBill D_ WIA II �ii►� ►IZ lbi?q,i��n❑ Malifill, � i `Idig �► Ass j ,-� ►'+i ii : "_ raj% I N �►�► � I• �� lfillflj� i� :Cllu�� AP L-1:1-.1 IBM, 9660 9570 D CSI r y11, N WIO M 9631 9621 9601 9591 9571 - 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 WSBMinneapolis, MIN 55416 rr Q www.wsbsbeng.comg.com && Associates, Y 763 -541 -4800 -Fax 763-541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION GILLARD AVENUE 9804 9780 9801 9783 w [-- > w �ry O 9750 9714 � 9660 LL LL 4« I < < < << << < < < < Im �p ® i m Im rrl r O 9751 9741 9721 9691 9681 9661 9651 9530 LL-tY LL- p O N M Ll KK , ,r r� 9551 9521 9511 LnM 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GILLARD AVENUE MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Cn 0 FT 50 100 LEGEND WSB Project No. 02596-360 CITY O F City Project No. 16CO03 Monti p Figure Number L,L, 2 j PROPOSED CATCH BASIN �! PROPOSED 15"-18" STORM SEWER PROPOSED B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER I EXISTING WATERMAIN » EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM MANHOLE m EXISTING CATCH BASIN WSB Project No. 02596-360 CITY O F City Project No. 16CO03 Monti p Figure Number L,L, 2 j 9660 9570 D nl r 11-91 - . I% r A A m < < < ®Ell 8 < O 9631 9621 9601 9591 9571 a 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 3 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55416 rr www.wsbeng.com m & Associates, Inc. 763-541-4800- Fax 763-541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING I PLANNING CONSTRUCTION "m, GILLARD AVENUE 9750 9714 -< < < < < <— �E 97839751 9741 ry w � (/) — w Iz ry O LL 9530 LL LL- p O N M 9551 9521 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GILLARD AVENUE HILL GRADING IMPACT LIMITS MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 9721 0 FT 50 100 RD AVE. LEGEND HILL GRADING IMPACT LIMITS PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED 15"-18" STORM SEWER PROPOSED 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER I EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM MANHOLE ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN WSB Project No. 02596-360 C I T Y C) F City Project No. 16CO03 Mn• Figure Number 1 _ 3 9660 LL- v / LL- C"4 D n m I� I= M < o < rm M Iw r O 9691 9681 9661 9651 ::E 0 FT 50 100 RD AVE. LEGEND HILL GRADING IMPACT LIMITS PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED 15"-18" STORM SEWER PROPOSED 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER I EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM MANHOLE ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN WSB Project No. 02596-360 C I T Y C) F City Project No. 16CO03 Mn• Figure Number 1 _ 3 (n 0 FT 50 100 RD AVE. LEGEND HILL GRADING IMPACT LIMITS PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED 15"-18" STORM SEWER PROPOSED 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER I EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM MANHOLE ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN WSB Project No. 02596-360 C I T Y C) F City Project No. 16CO03 Mn• Figure Number 1 _ 3 SANDBERG RD. Y1 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 55416 S WSB Minneapolis, sb g.com rr www.wsbeng.com & Associates, Inc. 763-541-4800 - Fax 763-541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE i ENGINEERING I PLANNING CONSTRUCTION SANDBERG ROAD Ty�y yy w Y 2S 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SANDBERG ROAD MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 0 " 50 100 WSB Project No. 02596-360 C I T Y C_l F City Project No. 16C003 � Mont Figure Number 1 —� —_ 4 LEGEND ■ RECONSTRUCT STREET - 2" MILL & OVERLAY > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE I EXISTING WATERMAIN » EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM MANHOLE m EXISTING CATCH BASIN 0 " 50 100 WSB Project No. 02596-360 C I T Y C_l F City Project No. 16C003 � Mont Figure Number 1 —� —_ 4 95TH STREET, HAUG AVENUE, & 90TH STREET c 6746 6+02 6816 6835 6906 6936 0+ 974 I i , 22' BITJ J ' I I SU S T P NDS R/W VARIES 94TH ST. 930 0 0-4 _ ,,� 11,11 H 91ST ST. LJ -22' BIT O N N O f 0 90TH -9. 4 — — - I— n - 60+06 ° X09 �`55+00° J ° 50-10"' 22' BIT 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 95TH STREET, HAUG AVENUE, & 90TH STREET MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA LEGEND IL RECONSTRUCT STREET 2" MILL & OVERLAY > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING WATERMAIN >> EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN X 0 FT 200 400 WSB Project No. 02596-360 CITY C) F City Project No. 16CO03 Figure Number Montice 5 j I I I 16 - - w 701 Xeni.i a Avenue South, Suite 300 /7 Minneapolis, 55416 o /r'./S WS www.wsbsbeng.com c &Associates, Inc. Y 763 -541 -0600 -Fax 763-541-1100 \NFRASTRUCTURE i ENGINEERING PLANNING I CONSTRUCTION 95TH STREET, HAUG AVENUE, & 90TH STREET c 6746 6+02 6816 6835 6906 6936 0+ 974 I i , 22' BITJ J ' I I SU S T P NDS R/W VARIES 94TH ST. 930 0 0-4 _ ,,� 11,11 H 91ST ST. LJ -22' BIT O N N O f 0 90TH -9. 4 — — - I— n - 60+06 ° X09 �`55+00° J ° 50-10"' 22' BIT 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 95TH STREET, HAUG AVENUE, & 90TH STREET MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA LEGEND IL RECONSTRUCT STREET 2" MILL & OVERLAY > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING WATERMAIN >> EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN X 0 FT 200 400 WSB Project No. 02596-360 CITY C) F City Project No. 16CO03 Figure Number Montice 5 j I .................................. rAr3n lb n _Suite 300 A&701 Xenia Avenue So. MN 55416 Minneawpww wsbeng•COm WSO iiMOWInc. 163-6q1-0600. FaO63,541-1700 }^ & Associates. CONSTRUCTION c ENGINEERING PLANNING Y STRUCTURE' �NFRA I" -- MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA v IL a b v' o` N O E PLANNING , CONSTRUCTION MISSISSIPPI DRIVE lV11001,�j6ppi DRIVE , "'Cuu i MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 10 150 MCITY WSB Project No. 02596-360 /'� 4 F City Project No. 16CO03 V.tl�e Figure Number moi' f GILLARD AVENUE PROPOSEDTYPICAL SECTION OVARIES W ) ( 6' 8' 12' EX. DITCH EX.TRAIL� BLVD PARKING THRU NOTTO SCALE LANE LANE ( 100, RW NOTTO SCALE SOUTH OF RIVER FOREST DRIVE ? ( 12' THRU LANE 7►( 4' --><-VARIES-> BLVD DITCH NOTTO SCALE ■ 701 Xenia Avenue South -Suite 300 � A Minn eapol is, N N 55416 2017 Street Improvement Pra*ect CITY OF ■ ■ {�L.� Fax: 763-541-1700 0Mantzella - Date: Jan uary 26, 2017 2" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB340C 2" TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB330C 6" AGGREGATE BASE INSET A 2" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB240B 2" TYPE SP 12.5 NON—WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB2308 8" AGGREGATE BASE INSET B R/W R/W 1/2" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE _1 MIXTURE SPWEB240B 2" TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE " MIXTURE SPWEB230B 10' 8" AGGREGATE BASE 10 INSET C EXISTING SURMOUNTABLE PARKING THRU THRU PARKING a - 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 o /'� Minneapolis, 55416 W�1 JIr./S www.wsbsbeng.com Y R AS50- 763-5414800 -Fax 763-541-1700 \NFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION R/W R/W MISSISSIPPI DRIVE INSET B R/W R/W J VARIES 2' SHOULDER 22' THRU THRU I 2' SHOULDER I 2.0% 2.0% 4.0% 4.0% — T------ - -- - - --_- PROPOSED_ _ GRADE GRADE L --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � 95TH STREET, HAUG AVENUE, & 90TH STREET INSET C WSB Project No. 02596-360 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF City Project No.16C003 UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS, Figure Number Mont 6( 9 MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 60' 44' " 10' 12' 12' 10 EXISTING SURMOUNTABLE PARKING THRU THRU PARKING TYPE D CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED — — — —PROPOSED_ 4.0% 2.0% 2.0% = 4.0% — — — — — — — GRADE GRADE — --- — — — —— —iT----- I I I L SANDBERG ROAD R/W R/W INSET A 66' 30' 15' 15' EXISTING SURMOUNTABLE THRU THRU TYPE D CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED — - — — PROPOSED -- — 4.0% _ 2.0% _ 2.0% _ 4.0% . — — — _----- — GRADE -- — — — — — — — -- GRADE -7\- — _ _ �T -------- �= J— — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — MISSISSIPPI DRIVE INSET B R/W R/W J VARIES 2' SHOULDER 22' THRU THRU I 2' SHOULDER I 2.0% 2.0% 4.0% 4.0% — T------ - -- - - --_- PROPOSED_ _ GRADE GRADE L --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � 95TH STREET, HAUG AVENUE, & 90TH STREET INSET C WSB Project No. 02596-360 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF City Project No.16C003 UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS, Figure Number Mont 6( 9 MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 2" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB340C 2" TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB330C 8" AGGREGATE BASE INSET A 2" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB340C EXISTING BITUMINOUS EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE INSET B MILL & OVERLAY 3 U -701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 o W�1 /'� Minneapolis, 55416 JIr./S www.wsbsbeng.com Y&& Asso- 763.5414800 - Fax 763-541-1700 \NFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION R/W 66' R/W 2.0% 2.0% 4.0% 4.0% s = --T- ----- - - - - —- PROPOSED -- PROPOSED - I I GRADE GRADE - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - -- � HART BOULEVARD (EAST) INSET A: STA 115+00 TO 124+25 2017 STREET & UTILITY POEMENT PROJECT LIYIMRVEMN MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA WSB Project No. 02596-360 CITY OF City Project No. 16C003 Figure Number Montl�e 10 36' " 7'11' �- Ar 11' -� THRU THRU _ 7 PARKING EXISTING 8-618 CONCRETE PARKING CURB AND GUTTER 4.0% PROPOSED - - - -PROPOSED 4.0% - - - - - - - GRADE --_ GRADE ----------- _ 2.0% 2.0% _ _ /T-- --- I L —J ------------------ HART BOULEVARD (WEST) INSET A: STA 138+50 TO STA. 146+25 INSET B: STA 135+00 TO STA. 138+50 R/W R/W 66' c• 32' A 25'12' 11' 6.5' i EXISTING B-618 CONCRETE - THRU THRU BIKE LANE CURB AND GUTTER 4.0% PROPOSED - - - -PROPOSED 4.0% - - _ - - - - GRADE - -= GRADE — - - - - - - - - - - - -� \_ 2.0% 2.0% _ / T - - - - J ---------------------------- I L HART BOULEVARD (EAST) R/W R/W INSET B: STA 124+25 TO 131+00 66' ✓ 32' 4'� 12' 11 5 SHO�ULDtF J THRU THRU BIKE LANE 2.0% 2.0% 4.0% 4.0% s = --T- ----- - - - - —- PROPOSED -- PROPOSED - I I GRADE GRADE - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - -- � HART BOULEVARD (EAST) INSET A: STA 115+00 TO 124+25 2017 STREET & UTILITY POEMENT PROJECT LIYIMRVEMN MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA WSB Project No. 02596-360 CITY OF City Project No. 16C003 Figure Number Montl�e 10 APPENDIX B Opinions of Probable Cost Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16C003 WSB Project No. 2596-360 A. Sandberg Road Street Improvements 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION i WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 3 2104.509 WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 $105.00 MN/DOTEstimated 2104.509 REMOVE CASTING EACH 1 $125.00 $125.00 5 Item No. Specification Description 200 Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total EACH No. $125.00 $1,250.00 7 2105.500 Quantity Unit Price Cost A. Sandberg Road Street Improvements 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 2 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 200 $3.50 $700.00 3 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 3 $35.00 $105.00 4 2104.509 REMOVE CASTING EACH 1 $125.00 $125.00 5 2104.513 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 200 $3.50 $700.00 6 2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 10 $125.00 $1,250.00 7 2105.500 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 350 $15.00 $5,250.00 8 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 50 $15.00 $750.00 9 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CU YD 50 $25.00 $1,250.00 10 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 10 $130.00 $1,300.00 11 2130.501 WATER MGAL 50 $30.00 $1,500.00 12 2118.610 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 630 $18.00 $11,340.00 13 2215.501 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 2,100 $3.00 $6,300.00 14 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 120 $2.00 $240.00 15 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 250 $65.00 $16,250.00 16 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 250 $70.00 $17,500.00 17 2503.602 CHIMNEY SEALS (EXTERNAL) EACH 3 $200.00 $600.00 18 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 2 $275.00 $550.00 19 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 20 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 1 $750.00 $750.00 21 2506.521 INSTALL CASTING EACH 3 $250.00 $750.00 22 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB DESIGN D (MODIFIED) LIN FT 200 $15.00 $3,000.00 23 2564.531 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 24 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 20 $35.00 $700.00 25 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 900 $1.75 $1,575.00 26 2573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 5 $225.00 $1,125.00 27 2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 100 $4.50 $450.00 28 2573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EACH 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 29 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL TOPSOIL & FERT) SQ YD 60 $9.00 $540.00 30 2852.502 4" SOLID LINE EPDXY - WHITE LIN FT 240 $0.35 $84.00 31 2852.502 24" SOLID LINE EPDXY- WHITE LIN FT 30 $7.50 $225.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $88,309.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $8,831.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $97,140.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $21,371.00 Note: Total Rounded to Match Assessment Roll TOTAL - SANDBERG STREET IMPROVEMENTS $118,368.00 B. Hart Boulevard (West) Street Improvements - Reconstruction 32 2021.501 MOBILIZATION i WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 37 WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) MN/DOTEstimated 2130.501 WATER 40 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 41 2215.501 Item No. Specification Description BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) No. 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX 46 2505.601 Quantity Unit Price Cost B. Hart Boulevard (West) Street Improvements - Reconstruction 32 2021.501 MOBILIZATION 33 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 34 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN 35 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 36 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 37 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) 38 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) 39 2130.501 WATER 40 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 41 2215.501 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 42 2215.501 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 43 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) 44 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) 45 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX 46 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION 47 2531.507 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 48 2564.531 TRAFFIC CONTROL 49 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C 50 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS 51 2573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 52 2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER 53 2573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT 54 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL TOPSOIL & FERT) 55 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE EPDXY - YELLOW 56 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY LUMP SUM 1 $4,300.00 $4,300.00 LIN FT 350 $3.50 $1,225.00 EACH 3 $35.00 $105.00 LIN FT 170 $3.50 $595.00 CU YD 70 $15.00 $1,050.00 CU YD 70 $25.00 $1,750.00 HOUR 4 $130.00 $520.00 MGAL 50 $30.00 $1,500.00 TON 120 $18.00 $2,160.00 SQ YD 2,990 $3.00 $8,970.00 GALLON 150 $2.00 $300.00 TON 340 $65.00 $22,100.00 TON 340 $70.00 $23,800.00 EACH 6 $275.00 $1,650.00 LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 LIN FT 350 $13.00 $4,550.00 LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 SQ FT 20 $35.00 $700.00 LIN FT 1,550 $1.75 $2,712.50 EACH 5 $225.00 $1,125.00 LIN FT 100 $4.50 $450.00 EACH 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 SQ YD 100 $9.00 $900.00 LIN FT 820 $0.35 $287.00 LIN FT 110 $0.50 $55.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $91,205.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $9,121.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $100,326.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $22,072.00 TOTAL - HART BOULEVARD (WEST) STREET IMPROVEMENTS $122,398.00 B. Hart Boulevard (West) Street Improvements - Mill and Overlay 57 2021.501 MOBILIZATION i WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 REMOVE SIGN EACH WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 MN/DOTEstimated HOUR 1 $130.00 $130.00 Item No. Specification Description Estimated Notes Unit Total Estimated Total No. $0.00 Unit Price Quantity Cost B. Hart Boulevard (West) Street Improvements - Mill and Overlay 57 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 58 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 160 $3.50 $560.00 59 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 1 $35.00 $35.00 60 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 1 $130.00 $130.00 61 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (2.0") SQ YD 1,350 $0.00 $0.00 62 2215.501 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 70 $2.00 $140.00 63 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 160 $65.00 $10,400.00 64 2531.507 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 160 $13.00 $2,080.00 65 2564.531 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 66 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 10 $35.00 $350.00 67 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 700 $1.75 $1,225.00 68 2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 100 $4.50 $450.00 69 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE EPDXY - YELLOW LIN FT 370 $0.35 $129.50 70 2852.502 24" SOLID LINE EPDXY- WHITE LIN FT 20 $7.50 $150.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $21,650.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $2,165.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $23,815.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $5,239.00 TOTAL - HART BOULEVARD (WEST) STREET IMPROVEMENTS $29,054.00 B 1. Hart Boulevard (West) Utility Improvements 71 2021.501 MOBILIZATION EACH 1 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 72 2104.501 REMOVE WATER MAIN LIN FT 840 $4.00 $3,360.00 73 2104.509 REMOVE GATE VALVE EACH 7 $150.00 $1,050.00 74 2104.509 REMOVE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EACH 2 $250.00 $500.00 75 2104.601 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LUMP SUM 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 76 2105.601 DEWATERING LUM SUM 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 77 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 4 $750.00 $3,000.00 78 2504.602 HYDRANT EACH 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 79 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 80 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 2 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 81 2504.602 12" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 4 $2,500.00 $10,000.00 82 2504.603 6" WATER MAIN DIP CL 52 W/POLYWRAP LIN FT 50 $45.00 $2,250.00 83 2504.603 8" WATER MAIN DIP CL 52 W/POLYWRAP LIN FT 50 $50.00 $2,500.00 84 2504.603 12" WATER MAIN DIP CL 52 W/POLYWRAP LIN FT 732 $55.00 $40,260.00 85 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS-EXPDXY COATED POUND 1,370 $5.00 $6,850.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $122,570.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $12,257.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $134,827.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $29,662.00 TOTAL - HART BOULEVARD (WEST) UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS $164,489.00 C. Hart Boulevard (East) Street Improvements - Mill and Overlay 86 2021.501 MOBILIZATION i WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 REMOVE SIGN EACH WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 REMOVE CASTING MN/DOTEstimated 1 $125.00 $125.00 90 2104.523 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 5 $35.00 Item No. Specification Description SALVAGE MAILBOX Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total SALVAGE CASTING No. 3 $125.00 $375.00 93 2123.61 Quantity Unit Price Cost C. Hart Boulevard (East) Street Improvements - Mill and Overlay 86 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $2,300.00 $2,300.00 87 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 320 $3.50 $1,120.00 88 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 3 $35.00 $105.00 89 2104.509 REMOVE CASTING EACH 1 $125.00 $125.00 90 2104.523 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 5 $35.00 $175.00 91 2104.523 SALVAGE MAILBOX EACH 6 $35.00 $210.00 92 2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 3 $125.00 $375.00 93 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 1 $130.00 $130.00 94 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (2.0") SQ YD 2290 $5.00 $11,450.00 95 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 120 $2.00 $240.00 96 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 260 $65.00 $16,900.00 97 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 3 $275.00 $825.00 98 2531.507 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 320 $13.00 $4,160.00 99 2564.531 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 100 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 25 $35.00 $875.00 101 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 1350 $1.75 $2,362.50 102 2573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 2 $225.00 $450.00 103 2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 100 $4.50 $450.00 104 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE EPDXY - YELLOW LIN FT 760 $0.35 $266.00 105 2852.502 4" SOLID LINE EPDXY - WHITE LIN FT 720 $0.35 $252.00 106 2852.502 24" SOLID LINE EPDXY- WHITE LIN FT 20 $7.50 $150.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $47,921.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $4,792.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $52,713.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $11,597.00 TOTAL - HART BOULEVARD (EAST) STREET IMPROVEMENTS $64,310.00 Cl. Hart Boulevard (East) Street Improvements - Reconstruction 107 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 109 2104.513 WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 $290.50 MN/DOTEstimated 2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 1 $125.00 $125.00 111 Item No. Specification Description 26 Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total CU YD No. $15.00 $1,350.00 113 2118.607 Quantity Unit Price Cost Cl. Hart Boulevard (East) Street Improvements - Reconstruction 107 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $4,600.00 $4,600.00 108 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 3 $35.00 $105.00 109 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 83 $3.50 $290.50 110 2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 1 $125.00 $125.00 111 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 26 $15.00 $390.00 112 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 90 $15.00 $1,350.00 113 2118.607 AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 2 CU YD 50 $40.00 $2,000.00 114 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 4 $130.00 $520.00 115 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 140 $18.00 $2,520.00 116 2215.501 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 3460 $3.00 $10,380.00 117 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 180 $2.00 $360.00 118 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 400 $65.00 $26,000.00 119 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 400 $70.00 $28,000.00 120 2503.602 CHIMNEY SEALS (EXTERNAL) EACH 1 $200.00 $200.00 121 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 122 2506.521 INSTALL CASTING EACH 1 $250.00 $250.00 123 2564.531 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 124 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 8 $35.00 $280.00 125 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 1850 $1.75 $3,237.50 126 2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 100 $4.50 $450.00 127 2573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EACH 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 128 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3 SQ YD 1030 $2.50 $2,575.00 129 2575.563 HYDRAULIC MATRIX TYPE MULCH SQ YD 1030 $2.00 $2,060.00 130 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE EPDXY - YELLOW LIN FT 930 $0.35 $325.50 131 2852.502 4" SOLID LINE EPDXY - WHITE LIN FT 890 $0.35 $311.50 132 2852.502 24" SOLID LINE EPDXY- WHITE LIN FT 20 $7.50 $150.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $96,880.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $9,688.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $106,568.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $23,445.00 TOTAL - HART BOULEVARD (EAST) STREET IMPROVEMENTS $130,013.00 D. Hart Trail Addition - Highland Way to WWTP 133 2021.501 MOBILIZATION 134 2360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (3.0" THICK) 135 2531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP LUMP SUM 1 $700.00 $700.00 SO YD 450 $25.00 i WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 TOTAL - HART TRAIL ADDITION $20,063.00 WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 MN/DOTEstimated Item No. Specification Description Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total No. Quantity Unit Price Cost D. Hart Trail Addition - Highland Way to WWTP 133 2021.501 MOBILIZATION 134 2360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (3.0" THICK) 135 2531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP LUMP SUM 1 $700.00 $700.00 SO YD 450 $25.00 $11,250.00 EACH 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $14,950.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $1,495.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $16,445.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $3,618.00 TOTAL - HART TRAIL ADDITION $20,063.00 E. Mississippi Drive Street Improvements 136 2021.501 MOBILIZATION i WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 138 2104.505 WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 $595.00 MN/DOTEstimated 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 30 $9.00 $270.00 140 Item No. Specification Description 7 Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total EACH No. $125.00 $625.00 142 2104.513 Quantity Unit Price Cost E. Mississippi Drive Street Improvements 136 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $11,400.00 $11,400.00 137 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 1,290 $3.50 $4,515.00 138 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 70 $8.50 $595.00 139 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 30 $9.00 $270.00 140 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 7 $35.00 $245.00 141 2104.509 REMOVE CASTING EACH 5 $125.00 $625.00 142 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 90 $3.50 $315.00 143 2104.523 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 14 $35.00 $490.00 144 2104.523 SALVAGE MAILBOX EACH 14 $35.00 $490.00 145 2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 20 $125.00 $2,500.00 146 2104.601 SALVAGE LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES EACH 5 $2,000.00 $10,000.00 147 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 0 $15.00 $0.00 148 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 160 $15.00 $2,400.00 149 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 2 $150.00 $300.00 150 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 5 $130.00 $650.00 151 2130.501 WATER MGAL 50 $30.00 $1,500.00 152 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 260 $18.00 $4,680.00 153 2215.501 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 6,570 $3.00 $19,710.00 154 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 330 $2.00 $660.00 155 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 750 $65.00 $48,750.00 156 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 750 $70.00 $52,500.00 157 2360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (3.0" THICK) (RESIDENTIAL) SQ YD 70 $30.00 $2,100.00 158 2502.601 IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVISION LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 159 2503.602 CHIMNEY SEALS (EXTERNAL) EACH 20 $200.00 $4,000.00 160 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 5 $275.00 $1,375.00 161 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 162 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 5 $750.00 $3,750.00 163 2506.521 INSTALL CASTING EACH 20 $250.00 $5,000.00 164 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB DESIGN D (SPECIAL) LIN FT 1,290 $15.00 $19,350.00 165 2531.618 7" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 30 $65.00 $1,950.00 166 2540.602 MAIL BOX EACH 5 $25.00 $125.00 167 2540.602 MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 5 $50.00 $250.00 168 2540.602 MAIL BOX (TEMPORARY) EACH 14 $15.00 $210.00 169 2557.603 INSTALL MAILBOX EACH 14 $50.00 $700.00 170 2564.531 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 171 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 30 $35.00 $1,050.00 172 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 4,200 $1.75 $7,350.00 173 2573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 8 $225.00 $1,800.00 174 2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 100 $4.50 $450.00 175 2573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EACH 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 176 2574.525 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 60 $40.00 $2,400.00 177 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL TOPSOIL & FERT) SQ YD 1,100 $9.00 $9,900.00 178 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3 SQ YD 0 $2.50 $0.00 179 2852.502 4" SOLID LINE EPDXY - WHITE LIN FT 590 $0.35 $206.50 180 2852.502 24" SOLID LINE EPDXY- WHITE LIN FT 20 $7.50 $150.00 181 2582.602 PAVT MSSG EPDXY EACH 4 $150.00 $600.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $239,512.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $23,951.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $263,463.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $57,962.00 TOTAL - MISSISSIPPI DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS $321,425.00 E I. Mississippi Drive Utility Improvements 182 2021.501 MOBILIZATION i WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 15" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V 187 WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 6" PVC CLEANOUT MN/DOTEstimated 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISITING STORM SEWER 190 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 191 2506.602 Item No. Specification Description Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total No. $14,349.00 TOTAL - MISSISSIPPI DRIVE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS $79,572.00 Quantity Unit Price Cost E I. Mississippi Drive Utility Improvements 182 2021.501 MOBILIZATION 183 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) 184 2104.509 REMOVE CATCH BASIN 185 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION 186 2501.511 15" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V 187 2502.541 6" PERF PVC PIPE DRAIN 188 2502.602 6" PVC CLEANOUT 189 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISITING STORM SEWER 190 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 191 2506.602 INSTALL CATCH BASIN (2'X3') LUMP SUM 1 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 LIN FT 25 $4.00 $100.00 EACH 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 CU YD 430 $15.00 $6,444.44 LIN FT 250 $35.00 $8,750.00 LIN FT 1,450 $20.00 $29,000.00 EACH 14 $300.00 $4,200.00 EACH 1 $500.00 $500.00 LIN FT 15 $300.00 $4,500.00 EACH 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $59,294.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $5,929.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $65,223.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $14,349.00 TOTAL - MISSISSIPPI DRIVE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS $79,572.00 F. Gillard Avenue Street Improvements - 32 Feet Wide W/ Curb and Gutter 192 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 194 2104.505 WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 $5,490.00 MN/DOTEstimated 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 36 $35.00 $1,260.00 196 Item No. Specification Description 2 Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total LIN FT No. $4.50 $1,665.00 198 2104.513 Quantity Unit Price Cost F. Gillard Avenue Street Improvements - 32 Feet Wide W/ Curb and Gutter 192 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $21,100.00 $21,100.00 193 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SO YD 290 $8.50 $2,465.00 194 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SO YD 610 $9.00 $5,490.00 195 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 36 $35.00 $1,260.00 196 2104.509 REMOVE CASTING EACH 2 $125.00 $250.00 197 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 370 $4.50 $1,665.00 198 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 320 $3.50 $1,120.00 199 2104.523 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 23 $35.00 $805.00 200 2104.523 SALVAGE MAILBOX EACH 23 $35.00 $805.00 201 2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 5 $125.00 $625.00 202 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 770 $15.00 $11,550.00 203 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 130 $15.00 $1,950.00 204 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CU YD 117 $25.00 $2,925.00 205 2105.523 COMMON BORROW (CV) CU YD 452 $18.00 $8,136.00 206 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 20 $150.00 $3,000.00 207 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 10 $130.00 $1,300.00 208 2130.501 WATER MGAL 50 $30.00 $1,500.00 209 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 3,250 $18.00 $58,500.00 210 2215.501 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SO YD 5,520 $3.00 $16,560.00 211 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 370 $2.00 $740.00 212 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 840 $65.00 $54,600.00 213 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 840 $70.00 $58,800.00 214 2360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (3.0" THICK) (RESIDENTIAL/TRAIL) SO YD 260 $30.00 $7,800.00 215 2502.541 6" PERF PVC PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 250 $20.00 $5,000.00 216 2502.602 6" PVC CLEANOUT EACH 2 $300.00 $600.00 217 2503.602 CHIMNEY SEALS (EXTERNAL) EACH 7 $200.00 $1,400.00 218 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 2 $275.00 $550.00 219 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 220 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 221 2506.521 INSTALL CASTING EACH 5 $250.00 $1,250.00 222 2531.507 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 3,940 $13.00 $51,220.00 223 2531.507 7" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SO YD 549 $65.00 $35,685.00 224 2540.602 MAIL BOX EACH 5 $25.00 $125.00 225 2540.602 MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 5 $50.00 $250.00 226 2540.602 MAIL BOX (TEMPORARY) EACH 23 $15.00 $345.00 227 2557.603 INSTALL MAILBOX EACH 18 $50.00 $900.00 228 2564.531 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 229 2564.531 SIGN PANEL LUMP SUM 1 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 230 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 3,940 $1.75 $6,895.00 231 2573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 2 $225.00 $450.00 232 2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 1,000 $4.50 $4,500.00 233 2573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EACH 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 234 2574.525 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 623 $30.00 $18,690.00 235 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3 SO YD 5,600 $2.50 $14,000.00 236 2575.563 HYDRAULIC MATRIX TYPE MULCH SO YD 5,600 $2.00 $11,200.00 237 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY LIN FT 2,100 $0.50 $1,050.00 238 2852.502 24" SOLID LINE EPDXY- WHITE LIN FT 32 $7.50 $240.00 CONSTRICTION TOTAL $443,196.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $44,320.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $487,516.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $107,254.00 TOTAL - GILLARD AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS $594,770.00 F 1. Gillard Avenue Utility Improvements 239 2021.501 MOBILIZATION i WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 CONNECT TO EXISITING STORM SEWER 244 WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 INSTALL CATCH BASIN (2'X3') MN/DOTEstimated $77,075.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $7,708.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $84,783.00 Item No. Specification Description TOTAL - GILLARD AVENUE Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total No. Quantity Unit Price Cost F 1. Gillard Avenue Utility Improvements 239 2021.501 MOBILIZATION 240 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE CULVERT 241 2501.511 15" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V 242 2501.511 18" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V 243 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISITING STORM SEWER 244 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 245 2506.602 INSTALL CATCH BASIN (2'X3') LUMP SUM 1 $3,600.00 $3,600.00 LIN FT 180 $5.00 $900.00 LIN FT 945 $35.00 $33,075.00 LIN FT 175 $40.00 $7,000.00 EACH 8 $500.00 $4,000.00 LIN FT 65 $300.00 $19,500.00 EACH 9 $1,000.00 $9,000.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $77,075.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $7,708.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $84,783.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $18,652.00 TOTAL - GILLARD AVENUE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS $103,435.00 G. 95th Street Improvements - Gillard Avenue to Haug Avenue 246 2021.501 MOBILIZATION i WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 248 2104.513 WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 $87.50 MN/DOTEstimated 2104.523 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 8 $35.00 $280.00 250 Item No. Specification Description 8 Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total CU YD No. $15.00 $1,500.00 252 2105.507 Quantity Unit Price Cost G. 95th Street Improvements - Gillard Avenue to Haug Avenue 246 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 247 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 8 $35.00 $280.00 248 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 25 $3.50 $87.50 249 2104.523 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 8 $35.00 $280.00 250 2104.523 SALVAGE MAILBOX EACH 8 $35.00 $280.00 251 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 100 $15.00 $1,500.00 252 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 110 $15.00 $1,650.00 253 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 2 $150.00 $300.00 254 2118.607 AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 2 CU YD 100 $40.00 $4,000.00 255 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 3 $130.00 $390.00 256 2130.501 WATER MGAL 50 $30.00 $1,500.00 257 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 190 $18.00 $3,420.00 258 2215.501 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 4,160 $3.00 $12,480.00 259 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 220 $2.00 $440.00 260 2360.501 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 370 $65.00 $24,050.00 261 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 500 $70.00 $35,000.00 262 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 263 2540.602 MAIL BOX EACH 8 $25.00 $200.00 264 2540.602 MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 8 $50.00 $400.00 265 2540.602 MAIL BOX (TEMPORARY) EACH 8 $15.00 $120.00 266 2557.603 INSTALL MAILBOX EACH 8 $50.00 $400.00 267 2564.531 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 268 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 30 $35.00 $1,050.00 269 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 3,400 $1.75 $5,950.00 270 2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 500 $4.50 $2,250.00 271 2573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EACH 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 272 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3 SQ YD 2,080 $2.50 $5,200.00 273 2575.563 HYDRAULIC MATRIX TYPE MULCH SQ YD 2,080 $2.00 $4,160.00 274 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY LIN FT 1,790 $0.50 $895.00 275 2852.502 24" SOLID LINE EPDXY- WHITE LIN FT 20 $7.50 $150.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $121,433.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $12,143.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $133,576.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $29,387.00 TOTAL - 95th STREET IMPROVEMENTS $162,963.00 H. Haug Avenue Improvements 276 2021.501 MOBILIZATION i WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 278 2104.513 WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 $546.00 MN/DOTEstimated 2104.523 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 2 $35.00 $70.00 280 Item No. Specification Description 2 Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total CU YD No. $15.00 $2,250.00 282 2105.507 Quantity Unit Price Cost H. Haug Avenue Improvements 276 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $8,300.00 $8,300.00 277 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 8 $35.00 $280.00 278 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 156 $3.50 $546.00 279 2104.523 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 2 $35.00 $70.00 280 2104.523 SALVAGE MAILBOX EACH 2 $35.00 $70.00 281 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 150 $15.00 $2,250.00 282 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 160 $15.00 $2,400.00 283 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 2 $150.00 $300.00 284 2118.607 AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 2 CU YD 150 $40.00 $6,000.00 285 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 4 $130.00 $520.00 286 2130.501 WATER MGAL 50 $30.00 $1,500.00 287 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 280 $18.00 $5,040.00 288 2215.501 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 6,360 $3.00 $19,080.00 289 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 340 $2.00 $680.00 290 2360.501 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 570 $65.00 $37,050.00 291 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 760 $70.00 $53,200.00 292 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 293 2540.602 MAIL BOX EACH 2 $25.00 $50.00 294 2540.602 MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 2 $50.00 $100.00 295 2540.602 MAIL BOX (TEMPORARY) EACH 2 $15.00 $30.00 296 2557.603 INSTALL MAILBOX EACH 2 $50.00 $100.00 297 2564.531 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 298 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 20 $35.00 $700.00 299 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 5,200 $1.75 $9,100.00 300 2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 500 $4.50 $2,250.00 301 2573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EACH 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 302 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3 SQ YD 3,180 $2.50 $7,950.00 303 2575.563 HYDRAULIC MATRIX TYPE MULCH SQ YD 3,180 $2.00 $6,360.00 304 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY LIN FT 2,730 $0.50 $1,365.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $174,491.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $17,449.00 SUBTOTALTOTAL $191,940.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $42,227.00 TOTAL - HAUG AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS $234,167.00 I. 90th Street Improvements 305 2021.501 MOBILIZATION i WSB Project: 2017 Street Improvement Project Design By: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked By: EME City Project No.: 16CO03 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT WSB Project No: 02596-360 Date: 2/8/2017 COMMON EXCAVATION MN/DOTEstimated 90 $15.00 $1,350.00 309 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 80 $15.00 Item No. Specification Description SUBGRADE PREPARATION Notes Unit Total Estimated Estimated Total AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 2 No. 90 $40.00 $3,600.00 312 2123.61 Quantity Unit Price Cost I. 90th Street Improvements 305 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 306 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 8 $35.00 $280.00 307 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 25 $3.50 $87.50 308 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 90 $15.00 $1,350.00 309 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 80 $15.00 $1,200.00 310 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 2 $150.00 $300.00 311 2118.607 AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 2 CU YD 90 $40.00 $3,600.00 312 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 3 $130.00 $390.00 313 2130.501 WATER MGAL 50 $30.00 $1,500.00 314 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 140 $18.00 $2,520.00 315 2215.501 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 3,180 $3.00 $9,540.00 316 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 170 $2.00 $340.00 317 2360.501 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 290 $65.00 $18,850.00 318 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 380 $70.00 $26,600.00 319 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 320 2564.531 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 321 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 10 $35.00 $350.00 322 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 2,600 $1.75 $4,550.00 323 2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 500 $4.50 $2,250.00 324 2573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EACH 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 325 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3 SQ YD 1,590 $2.50 $3,975.00 326 2575.563 HYDRAULIC MATRIX TYPE MULCH SQ YD 1,590 $2.00 $3,180.00 327 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY LIN FT 1,370 $0.50 $685.00 CONSTRLCTION TOTAL $95,248.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $9,525.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $104,773.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $23,050.00 TOTAL - 90th STREET IMPROVEMENTS $127,823.00 APPENDIX C Assessment Maps Assessment Rolls Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Sandberg Road 2017 Street Improvement Project N It �n�cell(� City of Monticello, MN +A.��++ �. City Project Number: 16CO03 0 200Citya ` B 1 inch = 200 feet 9 4 X10 ZX\ u A T i� i 9 4 X10 ZX\ u A T i� CITY OF Mississippi Drive Mn ¢' 2017 Street Improvement Project N onti�effo City of Monticello, MN 0 150 YY B Feet �� City Project Number: 16C003 1 inch = 150 feet Gillard Avenue CITY � � 2017 Street Improvement Project N Monticello City of Monticello, MN 0 250 City Project Number: 16CO03 Feet WSB 1 inch = 250 feet � 95th Street, Haug Avenue, and 90th Street CITY M 2017 Street Improvement Project N . 0 400 Mont*Ce o City of Monticello, MN Feet WSB �`�� City Project Number: 16CO03 1 inch = 400 feet Preliminary Assessment Roll - A. Sandberg Road Improvements 1 12017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 16CO03 Note: #5 ias access from Sandberg Road as well as Marvin Road, but does not Rave frontage on Sandberg Road; therefore, the parcel is not proposed o be assessed (Preliminary Assessment Roll - B. Hart Boulevard (West) Street Improvements - Reconstruction I 12017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 16CO03 RESIDENTIAL NON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TOTAL RESIDENTIAL STREET No IDENTIFICATION NO. PROPERTY OWNER FF PROPERTY MAILING ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT (PID) FRONTFOOT ADDRESS UNITS (Map ID i91D 'Owner NameAror 97.27 $ Address 0.37 1 155027002030 IDI PROPERTIES LLC 213 SANDBERG RD, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 13,974.00 2 155027002040 JDJ PROPERTIES LLC 213 SANDBERG RD, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 47.95 $ 3 155027002041 JDJ PROPERTIES LLC 213 SANDBERG RD, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 $ 137.00 $ 4 155500142203 KMRE LLC 1401 FALLON AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0 S 155500142209 KMRE LLC 1401 FALLON AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.44 E 155027001040 LAAN PROPERTIES LLC 10943 HOLLISTER AVE NW, MAPLE LAKE, MN 55358 35,346.00 7 155027001041 CHINOS EQUITIES LLC 391574TH ST, CLEAR LAKE, MN 55319 71.24 $ 1 8 155027001031 CHINOS EQUITIES LLC 391574TH ST, CLEAR LAKE, MN 55319 $ 137.00 $ Note: #5 ias access from Sandberg Road as well as Marvin Road, but does not Rave frontage on Sandberg Road; therefore, the parcel is not proposed o be assessed (Preliminary Assessment Roll - B. Hart Boulevard (West) Street Improvements - Reconstruction I 12017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 16CO03 RESIDENTIAL NON RESIDENTIAL TOTAL RESIDENTIAL NON RES PROPOSED RATE TOTAL Acres FF RATE TOTAL ASSESSMENT FRONTFOOT 0.71 143 $ 137.00 $ 97.27 $ 19,591.00 0.37 102 $ 137.00 $ 50.69 $ 13,974.00 0.35 128 $ 137.00 $ 47.95 $ 17,536.00 0.93 100 $ 137.00 $ 127.41 $ 13,700.00 0 $ 137.00 $ - $ - 0.44 258 $ 137.00 $ 60.28 $ 35,346.00 0.52 113 $ 137.00 $ 71.24 $ 15,481.00 0.09 20 $ 137.00 $ 12.33 $ 2,740.00 TOTAL 3.41 864 $ 118,368.00 RESIDENTIAL NON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY STREET STREET NON RES No IDENTIFICATION NO. PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY MAILING ASSESSABLE RATE TOTAL Acres FF RATE TOTAL (PID) ADDRESS UNITS I FRONT FOOT (Map ID SID 'Owner Name 'Or QeJj'( Address 1 9J 155015022050) BONDH US,MARY KIR PROPERTY TR 7331A in AVE NW, BUFFALO, MN 55313 0 1 1 15501100020 BONDHUS,MARY KIR PROPERTY TR 7336ALADDINAVENW,BUFFALO,MN55313 1 1 11 155011000052 BONDHUS,MARY K IR PROPERTYTR 7336 ALADDI N AVE NW, BUFFALO, MN 55313 2 1 12 15550012430 (CITY OF jVj�N��CELL0 505 WALNUT ST STE 1, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 13 155011000181 �}iltijfF MM �%,jjTT��CELLO 505 WALNUT ST STE 1, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 (Preliminary Assessment Roll - 61. Hart Boulevard (West) Street Improvements - Mill and Overlay I 12017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 16CO03 PROPERTY No IDENTIFICATION NO. PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY MAILING (PID) jj)' ADDRESS 1�p ID33JD 155011000181CITy 9rfNMa4mI{e� CELLO 1505 WALNU ST STE 1, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 141 155011000180 �f MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST STE 1, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 $ 1,760.00 $ 1,760.00 $ 1,760.00 1 $ 3,520.00 RESIDENTIAL STREET ASSESSABLE RATE UNITS TOTAL 1.06 0 0.56 29 4.84 419 4.05 276 $ 0.94 57 $ 11.45 781 44.00 $ 12,144.00 $ 44.00 $ 2,508.00 $ $ NON RESIDENTIAL STREET TOTAL Acres FF RATE FRONT FOOT 2.93 178 I $ 44.00 I $ 5.64 J 147 $ 44.00 $ TOTAL 8.5- 325 NON RES TOTAL 7,832.00 I $ 6,468.00 $ $ TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 1,760.00 3,520.00 5,280.00 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Hdmin\Feasibility\Docs\Preliminary Assessment Roll_020717.xls Preliminary Assessment Roll - C. Hart Boulevard (East) Street Improvements - Mill and Overlay 2017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 16C003 PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS A17eJ�'( Address 1501 BROADWAY E, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PO BOX 564, MAPLE LAKE, MN 55358 PO BOX 254, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 70781TEN AVE NW, ANNANDALE, MN 55302 9020 W TOPEKA DR, PEORIA, AZ 85382 Preliminary Assessment Roll - C1. Hart Boulevard (East) Street Improvements - Reconstruction 1 12017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 16C003 PROPERTY No IDENTIFICATION NO. PROPERTY OWNER (PID) IMap ID �1D bwner Name j 54 155037001020,RIVERVIEW P ERSHIP j 57 150370010:* 58 1550370010� l l: LLiLC 59 15508400101LI-LIS SA t NG K 66 155231001010 VHM HOLDINGS LLC j 61 15501400319LIJiEIKES,DARVLC 62 1550370070<W H ITE,STEV E N j 63 15503700705*AARX,REBECCA L j 64 1555}5003377Z0007044�&EEjjRGQUIST,CATHERINE B j d 55.3,'IN RO5WARMH SA R 67 155037007010,BECKER,KENTG j 68 155037008061'hERICKSON,SHERVL j 69 15503700805LrJAKUBIEC,JUDITHA j -Q 155037008040,ISENOR,ANITA j 71 15503700803LIJiOWE,DEBORAHB j 72 j 15503700802dkROMELIT�JLRIS,HERBERTA ��RNARD P & MARY E L74�}}QrPH j -9 15503700905LIJiELTEMES,ROSE M j 761 15503700904MMAAS,NANCYS 77 155037009030,PERSON,JANETL j 78 15503700902LIJiILTNER,DOLORESC j 79 15503700901dliUBER,LEROY V & KAY L j 86 15503701006LTSEMELSBERGER,VIRGINIAC j 81 15503701005&ERGERSON,KEITH & MARI J j 82 15503701004(*)AN FRIE REAL ESTATE INC 83 15503701003LtUUA,DEAN M j 8415503701002dkEVJEN,5TEVEN j Ed 15503701001(*ROWER,LARRVD j 861 15503701106&ELLY,JOSEPH P j 87 15503701105MMURRAY,AMYJ REVTRUST 88 15503701104MMINDIS,SHIRLEV J j 89 15503701103*OHLAND,LINDAM 9Q 155037011020 PETERSON,MARYANN A 91 155037011010 ALBOLD FAMILY REVOCABLE LIV TR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY NON RESIDENTIAL No IDENTIFICATION NO. PROPERTY OWNER STREET (PID) RESIDENTIAL IMap ID i91D owner Name 52 155011000010 HOGLUND,STEVEN G &THOMAS E 53 155037001010 KEAN OF MONTICELLO INC S� 155037001030 DAHLHEIMER,DEBORA. C REV TRUST 5 155037001040 MOE, ST PHEN 58 15503700106 �MARDOT PROPERTIES LLC PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS A17eJ�'( Address 1501 BROADWAY E, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PO BOX 564, MAPLE LAKE, MN 55358 PO BOX 254, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 70781TEN AVE NW, ANNANDALE, MN 55302 9020 W TOPEKA DR, PEORIA, AZ 85382 Preliminary Assessment Roll - C1. Hart Boulevard (East) Street Improvements - Reconstruction 1 12017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 16C003 PROPERTY No IDENTIFICATION NO. PROPERTY OWNER (PID) IMap ID �1D bwner Name j 54 155037001020,RIVERVIEW P ERSHIP j 57 150370010:* 58 1550370010� l l: LLiLC 59 15508400101LI-LIS SA t NG K 66 155231001010 VHM HOLDINGS LLC j 61 15501400319LIJiEIKES,DARVLC 62 1550370070<W H ITE,STEV E N j 63 15503700705*AARX,REBECCA L j 64 1555}5003377Z0007044�&EEjjRGQUIST,CATHERINE B j d 55.3,'IN RO5WARMH SA R 67 155037007010,BECKER,KENTG j 68 155037008061'hERICKSON,SHERVL j 69 15503700805LrJAKUBIEC,JUDITHA j -Q 155037008040,ISENOR,ANITA j 71 15503700803LIJiOWE,DEBORAHB j 72 j 15503700802dkROMELIT�JLRIS,HERBERTA ��RNARD P & MARY E L74�}}QrPH j -9 15503700905LIJiELTEMES,ROSE M j 761 15503700904MMAAS,NANCYS 77 155037009030,PERSON,JANETL j 78 15503700902LIJiILTNER,DOLORESC j 79 15503700901dliUBER,LEROY V & KAY L j 86 15503701006LTSEMELSBERGER,VIRGINIAC j 81 15503701005&ERGERSON,KEITH & MARI J j 82 15503701004(*)AN FRIE REAL ESTATE INC 83 15503701003LtUUA,DEAN M j 8415503701002dkEVJEN,5TEVEN j Ed 15503701001(*ROWER,LARRVD j 861 15503701106&ELLY,JOSEPH P j 87 15503701105MMURRAY,AMYJ REVTRUST 88 15503701104MMINDIS,SHIRLEV J j 89 15503701103*OHLAND,LINDAM 9Q 155037011020 PETERSON,MARYANN A 91 155037011010 ALBOLD FAMILY REVOCABLE LIV TR \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Hdmin\Feasibility\Docs\Preliminary Assessment Roll_020717.x1s RESIDENTIAL NON RESIDENTIAL NON RESIDENTIAL TOTAL STANDARD STREET STREET STREET NON RES PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL RATE TOTAL I Acres FF RATE I TOTAL ASSESSMENT FR FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ADDRESS FRONT FOOT FRONT FOOT 80 $22.00 $ 1,760.00 3.116) 54 $1,760.00 �1 2�� $ 48.00 $13,392.00 $13,392.00 164 $ 80.00 $13,120.00 0.3 J 100J $ 48.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 0.48J 120 $ 80.00 0.5 10 $ 48.00 $5,088.00 $5,088.00 9020 W TOPEKA DR, PEORIA, AZ 85382 0.3 176 $ 0.22 126 $ 48.00 $6,048.00 $6,048.00 $14,080.00 1117TH AVE S, ST CLOUD, MN 56302 TOTAL 6.' 665.00 $31,088.00 \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Hdmin\Feasibility\Docs\Preliminary Assessment Roll_020717.x1s RESIDENTIAL NON RESIDENTIAL TOTAL STREET STREET NON RES PROPOSED PROPERTY MAILING ASSESSABLE RATE TOTAL Acres FF RATE TOTAL ASSESSMENT ADDRESS UNITS FRONT FOOT '1111000 Address PO 124,STCLOUD,MN56302 1.29� 164 $ 80.00 $13,120.00 $13,120.00 9020 W TOPEKA DR, PEORIA, AZ 85382 0.48J 120 $ 80.00 $9,600.00 $9,600.00 9020 W TOPEKA DR, PEORIA, AZ 85382 0.3 176 $ 80.00 $14,080.00 $14,080.00 1117TH AVE S, ST CLOUD, MN 56302 1.44 250 $ 80.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 14497TH ST NW, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1.77 55'( $ 80.00 $44,080.00 $44,080.00 2000 VICTORY MEMORIAL DR, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55412 0.45 196 $ 80.00 $15,680.00 $15,680.00 1440140TH ST, NEW RICHMOND, WI 54017 0.14 5 $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #29, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 5 $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #28, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 5 $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #27, MONTICELL0: MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #26, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #25, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #24, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #23, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 14730 88TH ST NE, OTSEGO, MN 55330 0.14 5 $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #21, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #20, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #19, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #18, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #17, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #16, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #15, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #14, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #13, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #12, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 PO BOX 1293, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 314 JERRY LIEFERT DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #9, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #8, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 1667 HALFWAY CROSSING, ROYALTON, MN 56373 0.14 S $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #6, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 5 $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 9004 BEAMING CT, LAS VEGAS, NV 89149 0.14 5 $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #4, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 5 $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #3, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 5 $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #2, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.14 5 $ 80.00 $400.00 $400.00 149 RIVERVIEW DR #1, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.141 S $ 80.00 $400.06 $400.00 TOTAL 10.04 1,607.00 $128,560.00 \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Hdmin\Feasibility\Docs\Preliminary Assessment Roll_020717.x1s (Preliminary Assessment Roll - E. Mississippi Street Improvements ) 12017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 16C003 PROPERTY No IDENTIFICATION NO. PROPERTY OWNER (PID) (Mao ID pID bwner Name 15 155014002050 ORRE,KIOWAJ &JOANNA L 14 155014002040 BARGER,BRADLEY D & MARY A 17 155014002030 CARL,WILLIAM M 18 155014002020 HACKENMUELLER,RONALD G & 19 155014002010 LAWRENCE,JAMES E & SHEILA 20 155014001130 THURMAN,RICHARD L 21 155014001120 EWERT,DAVID W &TAMMYK 22 155014001110 BEARL,LYNN 23 155014001100 MCELW EE,DANIEL E & MARY L 24 155014001090 REM SOUTH CENTRAL SERVICES INC 2i 155014001080 ST HILAIRE,THOMAS W REV TRUST 24 155014001070 ROLLING,ROBERT D 27 155014001060 LUNDQUIST,TRAVIS & DANIELLE 28 155014001050 JEAN-JENSON REVOCABLE TRUST 29 155014001040 ROMANI,ANTHONYJ & DEANNA M 30 155014001030 LARSON,CURTISA & KAREN G 31 155014001020 PERFETTI,JAMES C & JOAN P 32 155014001010 CHAPLIN LIVING TRUST 33 155011000011 JOHNSON,JOHN G & DEBORAH L 34155014003010 ROBINSON,JEAN K 3i 155014003020 MCEACHERN,THOMAS P & KRISTI L 34 155014003030 0LSEN,RAYMON D A & TRICIA M 37 155014003040 SCHMANSKI,JAMES R &KATHLEEN 38 155014003050 ALLEN,RYAN 39 155014003060 MAANUM,TRAVISJ& 40 155014003070 CARLSON,ANDREW T & CANDY 41 155014003080 PUGSLEY,SCOTTL 42 155014003090 MYREN,SHANNON 43 155014003100 WINTERFIELD,TROYJ & LISA M 44 155014003110 MCSTOCKER, ROBERT B & TERRI 4S 155014003120 WOLD,RANDALLS 44 155014003130 CITY OF MONTICELLO 47 155014003140 CITY OF MONTICELLO 48 155014003150 SCADDEN,LUKE K & BONITA R 49 155014003160 OLSON,JAY M & PENNY L 50 155014003171BOHANON,KRISTOPHER L & ANNA M 51 15501400318L14RRELL,STEVEN M PROPERTY MAILING I ADDRESS Arora Address 101 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 9937 JALGER AVE NE, OTSEGO, MN 55362 109 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 113 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 117 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 201 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 205 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 209 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 213 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 6600 FRANCE AVE S STE 500, EDINA, MN 55435 221 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 225 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 229 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PO BOX 393, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 237 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 241 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 245 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 249 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 253 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 244 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 240 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 236 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 232 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 228 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 224 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 18500218TH AVE NW, BIG LAKE, MN 55309 216 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 212 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 2241 FOREST SHORES RD, OGILVIE, MN 56358 204 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 200 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 505 WALNUT ST STE 1, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 505 WALNUT ST STE 1, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 112 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 108 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 104 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 100 MISSISSIPPI DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSABLE RATE TOTAL UNITS NON RESIDENTIAL TOTAL NON RES PROPOSED Acres FF RATE TOTAL ASSESSMENT $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ - $ - $4,600.00 $ - $ - $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 161,000.00 \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Hdmin\Feasibility\Docs\Preliminary Assessment Roll_020717.x1s Preliminary Assessment Roll - F. Gillard Street Improvements 2017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 16CO03 \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Hdmin\Feasibility\Docs\Preliminary Assessment Roll_020717.x1s RESIDENTIAL NON RESIDENTIAL TOTAL PROPERTY NON RES PROPOSED No IDENTIFICATION NO. PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY MAILING ASSESSABLE RATE TOTAL Acres FF RATE TOTAL ASSESSMENT (PID) ADDRESS UNITS (Map ID i91D owner Name Pro Qe Address 1 92J 155071001020 BROZOZOG,SPENCERJ& 4335 KIRKWOOD LN N, PLYMOUTH MN 55422 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 9�1 155071001010 STANSLASKI,MARC D 9821 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 94J 155061001010 HERBST,CUNT C&DIANE C 1 9801 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 155061001020 KUNGELHOETS,CARLA A 9783 RIVER FOREST DR, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 96 155061002010 CLASEMAN,LEE A & DOREEN A 9751 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 97 155061002020 KNOP,KEVIN L & CHERI J 9741 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 91 155061002030 HEROLD,MICK & 9721 GI LLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 9g 155061002050 GURNEY,JOHN D & MARGERY L 9691 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 106) 155061002060 FAIR,KEVIN P & PATRICIA M 9681 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 10 (J 155061002070 KONSOR,HEATHER A&PAUL 9661 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 10 155061002080 HACKENMUELLER,MARTIN) 9651 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 10 3) 155061002090 YOUNG,JOHN A & GINA M 9631 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 104 155061002100 FREESE,LEON C & LORI M 9621 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 104 155061002110 EIDEN,KARL G & KIMBERLY A 9601 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 106 155061002120 PETERSON, STEVEN M 9591 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 107 155061002130 HANSEN,PAUL L & MICHELLE L 9571 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 109 155061002140 SUUUVAN,BRETi 9551 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 104) 155126000010 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUTST STE 1, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0 $ 4,600.00 $ - $ - 1 116 155061003010,CORDES,RICHARDJ & ILA M 9521 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 1 11 15506100302111CALLSTROM, BRANDON K & CHRISTEL 9511 GILLARD AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 TOTAL 19 $ 87,400.00 (Preliminary Assessment Roll - H. & I. Haug Avenue & 90th Street I 2017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 16CO03 HAUG AVENUE 90TH STREET TOTAL PROPERTY NON RES PROPOSED No IDENTIFICATION NO. PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY MAILING FF RATE TOTAL FFRATE TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSMENT (PID) ADDRESS FF FF Map ID i�ID Uwner Name Prope Address 1 1121 155500173200IG P LAND CORP IPO 80X 177, WAHKON, MN 56386 I 2058) $ 45.00 1 $ 92,610.00 1 1300) $ 49.00 1 $ 63,700.00 1 $156,310.001 $ 156,310 00 TOTAL 205 130 $ 156,310.00 \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Hdmin\Feasibility\Docs\Preliminary Assessment Roll_020717.x1s APPENDIX D Pavement Core Memo Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 ■ WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541-4800 November 15, 2016 Shibani Bisson City Engineer 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Pavement Forensics Investigation in Monticello WSB & Associates is pleased to submit this pavement forensics report detailing the results of the pavement coring which were obtained in November 2016 on the proposed street improvement project areas in the City of Monticello. The various characteristics of the pavement cores were analyzed in order to assist in determining the appropriate pavement rehabilitation method for each roadway segment. A total of 15 pavement cores were taken within the roadway segments. The locations of the pavement cores are summarized in Figure 1 on Page 2 in this report and a summary of the pavement depths and aggregate base depth are shown on Table 1 on Page 3 in this report. Pictures of the cores can be found in Appendix A of this report. Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx Shibam Bisson November 15, 2016 iMontitcello PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Figure 1: Pavement Core Locations Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx ■ WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541-4800 Table 1: Pavement Core Summary Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx Aggregate Base Bituminous USCS Subgrade Core # Road Name Thickness Subgrade ID Subgrade Rating Thickness (Inches) Classifcation (Inches) 1 90th Street NE 6.1 8 Dark Grey Silty Sand SM Fair 2 Haug Avenue 5 10 Brown & Grey Lean Clay CL Poor 3 Haug Avenue 5.3 10.5 Light Brown Lean Clay with Sand CL Poor 4 95th Street NE 4.3 7 Dark Brown to Black Poorly Graded Sand with Silt SP -SM Good 5 95th Street NE 4.1 5 Brown Poorly Graded Sand with Clay SP -SC Good 6 NE Gillard Avenue 3.8 6 Brown Poorly Graded Sand with Clay SP -SC Good 7 NE Gillard Avenue 4 8 Brown Poorly Graded Sand with Clay SP -SC Good 8 Mississippi Drive NE 3.3 11 Poorly Graded Sand with Gravel SP Excellent 9 Mississippi Drive NE 4.4 9 Black Organic Lean Clay with Sand OL Unsuitable 10 Hart Boulevard 3.8 5.5 Poorly Graded Sand SP Excellent 11 Hart Boulevard 4.5 7.5 Poorly Graded Sand with Clay SP -SC Good 12 Hart Boulevard 5.6 7.5 Poorly Graded Sand SP Excellent 13 Hart Boulevard 4.2 7.5 Poorly Graded Sand SP Excellent 14 Sandberg Road 5.5 N/A Poorly Graded Sand SP Excellent 15 Sandberg Road 3.9 N/A Poorly Graded Sand SP Excellent Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx ■ WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541-4800 Recommendations Several factors are considered when determining the number of pavement cores to be taken, including the pavement condition or visible distresses present on the pavement and the variability of the pavement depth as the cores are being completed. Pavement coring identifies what exists under the visible layer of the pavement and can give a wealth of information including depths of the pavement layers, signs of bonding or un bonding and distresses that might not be visible from the road surface. The following are our recommendations based on the results of the coring. It is important to note that these are simply recommendations based on the results of the pavement forensic study. Factors such as the funding, traffic volumes, intended use, and future utility improvements should also be considered. Hart Boulevard West: Cores 12 and 13 were taken on Hart Boulevard West. The cores ranged in thickness from 4.2 to 5.6 inches. WSB would support the recommendation to reclaim the portion of Hart Boulevard East where the water main replacement is to occur. If the water main was not being replaced, a mill and overlay would be recommended. The area where Core 12 was taken where there is not a water main replacement, WSB would support the recommendation of a mill and overlay being completed. Hart Boulevard East: Cores 10 and 11 were taken along Hart Boulevard East. Core 10 had a thickness of 3.8 inches. Core 11 had a thickness of 4.5 inches. WSB would support the recommendation to complete a mill and overlay in the thicker area, from Broadway Avenue to the curve. It would be recommended to complete a reclamation where the pavement has a thinner section, from east of the curve to CR 39. Mississippi Drive NE: Cores 8 and 9 were taken on Mississippi Drive. The cores ranged in thickness from 3.3 to 4.4 inches. WSB would support the recommendation to complete a reclamation along Mississippi Drive. The area under Core 9 showed unsuitable subgrade conditions, consisting of black organic lean clay with sand. When completing a reclamation in this area it would be important to not reclaim to a depth that would incorporate any of the unsuitable material into the blend of material. Our recommendation would be to reclaim the bituminous along with 4 to 5 inches of the Class 5 material. NE Gillard Avenue: Cores 6 and 7 were taken on Gillard Avenue. The cores ranged in thickness from 3.8 to 4 inches. WSB would support the recommendation to complete a reclamation along Gillard Avenue. It would be our recommendation to reclaim the bituminous with 4 to 5 inches of the Class 5 material, stopping short of reclaiming into the underlying subgrade material. 95t`' Street NE: Cores 4 and 5 were taken on 95th Street NE. The cores ranged in thickness from 4.1 to 4.3 inches. WSB would support the recommendation to do a reclamation along 95th Street NE. It would be our recommendation to reclaim the bituminous with 4 to 5 inches of the Class 5 material. We would recommend not reclaiming into the underlying subgrade material which consists of poorly graded sand, silt and clay. Haup Avenue NE: Cores 2 and 3 were taken on Haug Avenue NE. The cores ranged in thickness from 5 to 5.3 inches. WSB would support the recommendation to complete a reclamation along Haug Avenue Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx Shibani Bisson November 15, 2016 NE. There is plenty of aggregate base material present to support a reclamation. It would be our recommendation to reclaim no deeper than 7 inches into the Class 5 base. 90th Street NE: Core 1 was taken on 90th Street NE. The core had a thickness of 6.1 inches. WSB would support the recommendation to complete a reclamation along 901h Street NE. Our recommendation would be to reclaim the bituminous along with 6 to 7 inches of the Class 5 material. Sandberg Road: Cores 14 and 15 were taken on Sandberg Road. The cores ranged in thickness from 3.9 inches to 5.5 inches. The underlying base material on this roadway is sand. WSB would recommend completing a full bituminous removal and replace along this roadway and put back the amount of material that is currently in place. Being the base material is un graded sand WSB would recommend removing 6 inches of the sand and replacing it with extra reclaimed material from other streets then repaving it with HMA. Another option would be to complete a reclamation and blend the material that is currently there, haul off the excess material and re -pave. Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx ■ WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541-4800 Appendix A Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx Shibam Bisson November 15, 2016 90" Street NE Core 1 Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx A WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541-4800 Haug Avenue NE Cores 2 and 3 Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx Shibani Bisson November 15, 2016 95" Street NE Cores 4 and 5 Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx Shibani Bisson November 15, 2016 NE GRIard Avenue Cores 6 and 7 Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx Shibani Bisson November 15, 2016 Mississippi Drive NE Cores 8 and 9 w t Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx Shibani Bisson November 15, 2016 Hart Boulevard Cores 10, 11, 12, 13 f Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com t.h \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx Shibani Bisson November 15, 2016 Sandberg Road Cores 14 and 15 Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com \\GVFILES01\Projects\02596-360\Roadway\Monticello Coring Results 11 2016.docx APPENDIX E Environmental Contamination Review — Area 1 Environmental Contamination Review — Area 2 Environmental Contamination Review — Area 3 Feasibility Report 2017 Street Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 WSB WS N Avml� engineering • planning • environmental • construction Memorandum To: Eric Eckman, WSB & Associates, Inc. From: Ryan Spencer, WSB & Associates, Inc, Date: November 15, 2016 Re: Desktop Contamination Review 2017 Street Improvements Project - Area 1 Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 2596-360 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 WSB reviewed available public Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) database information to identify verified or potentially contaminated sites that may be encountered during the 2017 Street Improvements Project - Area 1 located in Monticello, Minnesota (Project Area). A map showing the Project Area is included as Figure 1. The following databases were reviewed on November 15, 2016 as part of this review: • MPCA "What's in My Neighborhood?" website search • MDA "What's in My Neighborhood?" website search Project Area Listings No database listings were identified on the Project Area (see Figure 2). Adjacent Listings Five (5) database listings were identified immediately adjacent to the Project Area. The adjacent listings (Sites 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) were all identified on the MPCA Small Quantity Generator database. Inclusion on this database indicates the site generators 0-1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste per calendar month. Inclusion on this database does not indicate a regulated material spill or release. Surrounding Area Listings (within 500 feet) Five (5) database listings were identified within 500 feet of the Project Area (beyond adjacent). Some of the sites are included on more than one database. The surrounding area listings included: Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com • Four (4) MPCA Small Quantity Generator listings • One (1) MPCA Multiple Activities listing, indicating the site is recorded on more than one MPCA tracked database None of the surrounding area listings directly indicate a regulated material spill or release, except for the following: • Total Q Midwest (Site 8) - Reported at 1200 Highway 25 S, Monticello, MN and included on the MPCA Leak database. Inclusion on the Leak database indicates a petroleum release has occurred at the site resulting from a tank system. The identified leak (ID 11705) was discovered in 1998, consisted of an unknown petroleum product, and was issued site closure on October 11, 1999. Closure does not mean the site is free of contamination. It should be noted that that reported address for this site was determined to be located approximately 2 miles north or the Project Area in Big Lake, MN. Conclusion No environmental database listings were identified on the Project Area, five (5) listings were identified at adjacent sites, and five (5) listings were identified in the surrounding area within 500 feet of the Project Area. None of the listings directly indicated a regulated material spill or release except for Site 8. However, Site 8 was determined to be located approximately 2 miles north of the Project Area. Therefore, based on this limited desktop review, the potential to encounter contaminated soil and/or groundwater at the Project Area is low at this time. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 763-231- 4854 or rspencer@wsbeng.com. Enclosures: Figure 1 - Project Location Figure 2 - MPCA/MDA What's In My Neighborhood Search Results FIGURE 1 Project Area A �� r•�, ;1 0 ■ CHELSEq RD yy " a r r{, Project Location Figure 1: Project Location I• CITYaOF Manticella Area 1- Sandberg Road Monticello, MN I V LVV reet A WSB FIGURE 2 MPCA/MDA What's In My Neighborhood Results f - + • 1 J4 t PAL pt, F!L 2 8 _._ �-•- o r �# o N10 FF 3 i r x ■o c � ®f N i o 10 r � _3 f z • �. f r R 3 i ► +F iF fir. ai r r IF 8 4- I 4k IIF Y w '; ` •, 40 9.'10 dl rK r Project Location s } 500ft Buffer!; +� mit s MPCA Sites %t , _ � r + [mixxEsora - i •- _ Hazardous Waste ` ,� ` f I � �• 0 Multiple Activities 40'e. - + r 0 200 0 reet ` a r Figure 2: What's In My Neighborhood Results ■ �• CITYOF Monticello Area 1- Sandberg Road WSB �— �� Monticello, MN WSB WS N Avml� engineering • planning • environmental • construction Memorandum To: Eric Eckman, WSB & Associates, Inc. From: Ryan Spencer, WSB & Associates, Inc, Date: November 15, 2016 Re: Desktop Contamination Review 2017 Street Improvements Project - Area 2 Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 2596-360 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 WSB reviewed available public Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) database information to identify verified or potentially contaminated sites that may be encountered during the 2017 Street Improvements Project - Area 2 located in Monticello, Minnesota (Project Area). A map showing the Project Area is included as Figure 1. The following databases were reviewed on November 15, 2016 as part of this review: • MPCA "What's in My Neighborhood?" website search • MDA "What's in My Neighborhood?" website search Project Area Listings Three (3) database listings were identified on the Project Area (see Figure 2). The Project Area listings included: • Profession Services Group (Site 12) - Listed on the MPCA Multiple Activities database, indicating the site is included on more than one MPCA tracked database. • Monticello WWTP (Site 13) - Listed on the MPCA Multiple Activities database. • Victor Hellman Construction (Site 19) - Listed on the MPCA Small Quantity Generator database, indicating the site generates 1-1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste per calendar month. None of the identified Project Area listings directly indicate a hazardous material spill or release. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com Adjacent Listings Four (4) database listings were identified immediately adjacent to the Project Area. The adjacent listings included: • Bondhus Corp (Site 14) - Listed on the MPCA Multiple Activities database. • Lenny's Riverrd Sports (Site 17) - Listed on the MPCA Small Quantity Generator database. • Total Q Midwest Inc. (Site 18) - Listed on the MPCA Multiple Activities database. • Broadway Market (Site 20) - Listed on the MPCA Construction Stormwater Permit database, indicating a permit is in place to limit erosion and sediment runoff during and after construction. None of the identified adjacent listings directly indicate a hazardous material spill or release, except for the following: • Total Q Midwest Inc. (Site 18) - Located at 1547 East Broadway Street and included on the MPCA Leak Database (two incidents). o Cruisers Gas & Goods (Leak 11706) - Discovered in 1998, consisted of diesel, and was issued site closure by the MPCA on December 10, 1999. Site closured does not mean the site is free of contamination. o Q Midwest Store #3 (Leak 19175) - Discovered in 2013, consisted of diesel and gasoline (unleaded), impacted groundwater, and was issued site closure by the MPCA on December 16, 2013. Surrounding Area Listings (within 500 feet) Five (5) database listings were identified within 500 feet of the Project Area (beyond adjacent). Some of the sites are included on more than one database. The surrounding area listings included: • Two (2) Construction Stormwater Permit listings • One (1) MPCA Small Quantity Generator listing • One (1) MPCA Multiple Activities listing • One (1) MPCA Tank listing None of the surrounding area listings directly indicate a regulated material spill or release. Conclusion Three (3) environmental database listings were identified on the Project Area, four (4) listings were identified at adjacent sites, and five (5) listings were identified in the surrounding area within 500 feet of the Project Area. None of the listings directly indicated a regulated material spill or release except for Site 18. Therefore, based on this limited desktop review, there is a potential to encounter contaminated soil and/or groundwater that will require special management if excavation is planned in the vicinity of Site 18. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 763-231- 4854 or rspencer@wsbeng.com. Enclosures: Figure 1 - Project Location Figure 2 - MPCA/MDA What's In My Neighborhood Search Results FIGURE 1 Project Area �4 R �f i F �A it S , � 't • ! }•,. •�. I� M.ti� a �,4 '' � '� ,r F, „yam •� ••� �� •a Ft VIA i; 'i ''r''�� r' mow' • "�: y �: - . _:�='rye; • "� w _.. ��. i i. qz d Ile 0 461 . z. 17 4 Y @r _ Project Location 0 450 reet CITY OF Figure 1: Project Location ■ Monticello Area 2- Hart Blvd/Mississippi Dr NE/Private Dr WSB Monticello, MN FIGURE 2 MPCA/MDA What's In My Neighborhood Results -,� �r°r �►—f+fL� - :I lid* I �I�� •, . Ow. �- �_� - � �� •mow rt- + r.. ,.c �. SIV' � If.�', `�' �� +i � � • , ..� � -- � � , d �� .. ��• .ler • � .+ + cr � � _�+ � ' � 112 .13 If A AA;'111°rl�++l1 ` �� .� '° far ka. �.�195►: * �. 14 22. Jr i. 16 15 71: r + r 1 21 404 �.� L. Project Location +,+ 4 Ada 500ft Buffer ' MPCA Sites Water Hazardous Waste A Tanks and Leaks ,- ' Multiple Activities 0 550 CITYOF Figure 2: What's In My Neighborhood Results ■ � Monticello Area 2- Hart Blvd/Mississippi Dr NE/Private Dr WSB �— �� Monticello, MN WSB WS N Avml� engineering • planning • environmental • construction Memorandum To: Eric Eckman, WSB & Associates, Inc. From: Ryan Spencer, WSB & Associates, Inc, Date: November 15, 2016 Re: Desktop Contamination Review 2017 Street Improvements Project - Area 3 Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 2596-360 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 WSB reviewed available public Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) database information to identify verified or potentially contaminated sites that may be encountered during the 2017 Street Improvements Project - Area 3 located in Monticello, Minnesota (Project Area). A map showing the Project Area is included as Figure 1. The following databases were reviewed on November 15, 2016 as part of this review: • MPCA "What's in My Neighborhood?" website search • MDA "What's in My Neighborhood?" website search Project Area Listings No database listings were identified on the Project Area (see Figure 2). Adjacent Listings One (1) database listing was identified immediately adjacent to the Project Area. The adjacent listing included: • River Forest (Site 23) - Listed on the MPCA Construction Stormwater Permit database, indicating a permit is in place to limit erosion and sediment runoff during and after construction. The identified adjacent listing does not directly indicate a hazardous material spill or release, except for the following: Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com Surrounding Area Listings (within 500 feet) No database listings were identified within 500 feet of the Project Area (beyond adjacent). Conclusion No environmental database listings were identified on the Project Area, one (1) listing was identified at an adjacent site, and no listings were identified in the surrounding area within 500 feet of the Project Area. The identified adjacent listing does not directly indicate a regulated material spill or release. Therefore, based on this limited desktop review, the potential to encounter contaminated soil and/or groundwater at the Project Area is low at this time. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 763-231- 4854 or rspencer@wsbeng.com. Enclosures: Figure 1 - Project Location Figure 2 - MPCA/MDA What's In My Neighborhood Search Results FIGURE 1 Project Area N. Ot 41 'till, *"� ' ' fy 4 �'/rT l"�'N L •► _ . r. A.1 . 'AIM ! �{�,�,g��?new, r.� _ " . ,µQJ •� "� ,�_"�+` �''�"A+��"� w' y �^�`'�' �` �p�,;�. x,�,� ' - „' .Lyn r� �N ��e�A�.a., •� 'd 1 ►!�. I _ - - hot Ad '�ti d1 7[' �+4�r y� y'f`��f�"�'� •/wes ��.•i''"�r,-+�. N � ?� * • �'�- � • v lei ix 44%4 �. = A, qw •, .1..1fT1} 'hJ:JUW C7U 1�'rti �•��~ Yrl �� ., -�i4 _ e y • +�- if, E3 .. +W v_ y Cm - r 01 -`�w �• �. ':'` "(/'tel/ ." 1 -- a ' � -iii° �:,tawL"tZ..lr l'7U � �� s •'�•' , ■ `, . Yyyj rz_"' �'��'�'I!a. a .. e: ► ,.. 0 650 i Project Location "� r-eet CITYOF Figure 1: Project Location ■ Monikello Area 3- Gillard Ave NE/95th St NE WSB �� Monticello, MN FIGURE 2 MPCA/MDA What's In My Neighborhood Results N i� •Rwti _ o o r.tf• FT i m RA - d.# ' . � r .�.• •�: •.vim +�, ` ''°+f � • � � �f %t=ip �' .+w. -r .•. N Ir 2% _ d Mt M . '� 5 a "� ►4��74" jz ' ..!'`rdN p!'•,�r.+ * �'•�'Ai, .'. f-a7Ja7x r '~:!"�' 1f� x •,� ��.�-. +fir r ii'' AFM1J�� 7111 � � !L�' * � •S 04 .47 IL • R ; 1 , { a, .++R. Amy.• _ •i+f a 'k �.0 '� ry !� -.. ;�. .,(:]_ • t �• • � " ;, � o^w ,' r—~fi -moi. s,..,•a ''s, �..��►+. - #,�'� r ��. Nib? :..11 . A Project Location �� . +"■ �• a ,,. - 0 - L500ft Buffer/-,". MPCA Sites'+.+'"x "' 0 650 Waterfv sr . , reet Figure 2: What's In My Neighborhood Results A CITY OF _f N ontleello Area 3- Gillard Ave NE/95th St NE WSB �� Monticello, MN 2017 Street and Utility Improvements City Project 16C003 Accept Feasibility Report February 13, 2017 on ticello Agenda: • Project Scope • Gillard Avenue follow up from 1/23/17 Council meeting • Assessments/Funding • Schedule on ticello Project Scope: Street and drainage improvements: • Gillard Avenue • Existing 95th St, Haug Ave, 901h St • Mississippi Drive • Hart Boulevard • Sandberg Road Other improvements: • CSAH 75 pathway connection • Hart Blvd watermain replacement N REno MAO ■0r it P- Monticello {, Hart Boulevard {West} Proposed SMater Mal n Replacement �11�� TT11**11 11II1111Y1 2417 $tree; Improoemenl Project lA onticeHo Cly *f MDnhCdk)% Mfi1 4 150 W Chy PrrajpCt NuHnbW; y 4o8 ,. ��, Foe. 0 1 I j I 'I ficeflo Mon CSAH 75 Trail Connection ��l�t(1C1X�L�Ll1[? •. e r 1 Imb = 9* 1CA +x••^�rC}'�.a VTT1 irr9��{! Oil wlMd+f Vyr 0 0 (-� Mon,ticello Gillard Avenue: • Widen to 32 -feet wide with curb and gutter on east side o Culvert relocation and minor ditch grading • Lowering grade at hill to improve sight lines o Sight distance for stopping meets design standards o Sight distance at intersections from River Forest Drive meets design standards o Creates significant impact with street and utility replacements o Significant cost does not justify benefit o Not recommended based on engineering judgment • Driveway turnarounds/hammer heads • Relocate mailboxes on both sides of roadway, subject to Post Office determination I '1' I Mon ti,ceflo fr 6 9$04 �78fl 9f5U 9714 I 5 + o I I i4+►'1t+oo�lT+uo 1stig4_ —�SWP' 04- S3w4_ izr04 - --�i*pp- -y0#6l' rte{ 4 1 4621 Sul 9 8751 9741 S721 9881 9861 4667 X661 1016 DI,LLI�.1C LEGEND R.li.p+. le � yu uWul[I YiCf urn . • A •r7p® r.�1a pts +I MI■+i�=u • - MOKm C14 { drt10Y��4t•NAtiw{ � 1e�4"I+_IYronYCw �'1!t rt �m� V Wwma wWa —I—RRI■4 wimm •— '} ■nY VARA • vA III ■ WAS Gi1W q+ I 20+9019+60 19+0418+6018+0017+5017+0016+6019+041E+5015+4014r60 14+0013+60 134M 4P+50 12+W 1rt+B0 ll*W 14+60 1R] -F00 9+80 91 6+50 WID rr .,..,�,. •--I w•+oo 2417 MEET A L rnI*ITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT OILLA�RD AMUE EXISTIW SId,HT DISTA44MMo1 i ii�+m' Figure Numberi MIOU7CELLO, MINNESOTA 3 -I.T jmmL __ 1 r Ott .nom "�'�' #• Y�. v Google Eaf x•11 1 r .w • i .'1 I. .r -I.. .1 i... .r 11 ` `Montice Ho Gillard Avenue: Recommendation: • Install dynamic speed signs • Continue enforcement o Wright County will monitor area o Offered to meet residents onsite • PFC0 LI MOT 14 0 o Double fine zones dictated by the State • Traffic calming o Roadway striping o Boulevard trees o Increase signage Gillard Avenue � I j I 1' Mon ticeflo J GILLARD AVENUE PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION VARIES VARIES 432* -33" -}E TR'• w 6" 9' x; 12' 1 t 12' M 4'•-1."E 11`-1#" EX. DITCH EXTRAIL' BLVD PARKING THRU ' HRL) BLVD DITCH N0TT4$CdLE LANE LANE LANE ! '14' RVV NOR TO SCALI ' SOUTH OF TUVER FORST DPJYE 701 X—A--'.wh - i.- .w ffHN%L* .017 Street Ioiprove meot Project -4bw-o Il oni llo �R1�7Ai417 - � � I j I 'I ficeflo Mon Gillard Avenue �� 2G 71 BEd MyYpwrthYy P4gi� y i - C�}rdi�orresi4 C�PK�dl�L[feef 1SCflQ3 i�.tlGYa Alternative #1: Single Family Residential Assessment = $4,600/lot Does not include assessing for curb 19 lots @ $4,600 = $87,400 12.5% of street and storm sewer costs 14.7% of street only costs Alternative #2*: Single Family Residential Assessment = $5,880/lot Includes assessing for curb 19 lots @ $5,880 = $111,720 16% of street and storm sewer costs 18.8% of street only costs 'Deviates from past practice, i.e. Prairie Rd, W River Street improvement projects from 2010. Policy revision. Township properties not assessed. Will be notified of Public Hearing. � I j I 'I ficeflo Mon Mississippi Drive • Single Family Residential Assessment = $4,600/lot 35 lots @ $46,000 = $161,000 Assessments total 50% of street improvement cost Assessments total 40 %of street and drainage improvements costs i Mont ceHo Hart Boulevard West Hart Saulevard 1 2�",17 $lrow Jm L'GN¢I ni Prq&....i VAR1 491[3Ci 0 cnr ow cl MoaGla, MN ° —; AK -' City Prwd Nmtm: 16=3 Bondhus properties (#9/10, 11) assessed based on current use at single family rate for mill and overlay instead of reconstruction #9/10 @ 1 dwelling unit = $1,760 #11@ 2 dwelling units = $3,520 If properties redevelop to more intense use, additional assessments will apply at the time of redevelopment Remaining costs are City funded i Mont ce Ho Hart Boulevard East !�_ 8777 SLrML Im%Dv&r n! ProJeC! w Md1C111[ E�4 COy of Mgrlixlia. MN' CMyPMJWNumV ber 19C3 1�Fe[i Mill and Overlav Section Assessments based on front foot rate for commercial properties Hoglund property (#52) assessed based on current use at single family rate of $1,760 per dwelling. If property redevelops to more intense use, additional assessments will apply at the time of redevelopment Reconstruction Section Assessment method based on front foot rate for apartments, townhomes, commercial lots. Assessment total = 100% of project cost. � I j I 'I ficeflo Mon Sandberg Road 9andh*Fg Road f ,1077 It IMgroraman[ Pr• A -A( t j�110 ray of UnmamK uN x CJrYRV CJN4M r.16CM a aoa� Assessment method based on front foot rate of each property with direct to Sandberg Road Pawn shop (#5) is proposed not be assessed. Primary access from TH 25. Assessment total =100% of project cost on ticello Estimated Project Cost Breakdown: Street Improvements Street Improvements Watermain Improvements SUBTOTAL Street Improvements Trail Improvements SUBTOTAL Street Improvements Utility Improvements SUBTOTAL Street Improvements Utility Improvements SUBTOTAL Street Improvements Street Improvements Street and Drainage Improvements $315,941 $214,386 $400,997 $698,205 ti'ceflo 0 Preliminary Assessment Rates: Non-residential $137/FF Residential $1,760/Unit Residential Town $400/Unit Home Mill & Overlay $1,760/Unit Multi -family & $44/FF Non-residential Reconstruction Multi -family & $80/FF Non-residential Residential $4,600/Unit Residential $4,600/Unit Non-residential $45/FF Non-residential $49/FF 864 3 30 J 1 611 1,457 35 19 2,058 1,300 1 Assessments City Funds TOTAL Sandberg Road .: $118,368 Hart Boulevard West :1 $151,452 Hart Boulevard $164,489 $164,489 Watermain Hart Boulevard East• . 'I : $194,323 Hart Boulevard Trail $20,063 Mississippi Drive $400,997 Gillard Avenue $698,205 95th Street $162,963 Haug Avenue $234,167 90th Street $127,823 TOTAL $688,006 $1,584,844 $2,272,850 onticeHo Schedule: Neighborhood Meetings: • Gillard Ave • Mississippi Drive, Sandberg Road, Hart Blvd Council Accepts Feasibility Report Public Hearing/Order Project/Authorize Preparation of Plans Council Approves Plans/Authorize Ad for Bid Receive Bids Award Contract Begin Construction Complete Construction January 23, 2017 February 1, 2017 February 13, 2017 February 27, 2017 April 2017 April/May 2017 May 2017 June 2017 September 2017 on ticello Council Action Alternatives: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution #2017-04 accepting the Feasibility Report, set a public hearing for February 27, 2017 and set the residential street reconstruction assessment rate at $4,600 per unit for the 2017 Street and Utility Improvement Project, City Project No.16C003. 2*. Motion to adopt Resolution #2017-04 acceptingthe FeasibilityReport, set the public hearingfor Februar 27, 2017 and set the residential idential streereconstruction ssessment rate at $4,600 February unit, except for Gillard Avenue where the assessment rate would be set at $5,880 per unit for the 2017 Street and Utility Improvement Project,Y l' Cit Project No.16CO03 3. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #2017-04 at this time. *Alternate 2 is a chane to past practice and staff will update the assessment policy going forward if Alternate 2 is selected 0 TOM A. SAMRA VICE PRESIDENT, FACILITIES UNITED STATES OPOSTAL SERVICE January 13, 2017 City of Monticello Attn: Mayor Brian Stumpf 110 Vine Street Monticello MN, 55362-8896 RE: Final Decision Regarding Monticello Post Office ("Post Office") located on 331 W Broadway Street Dear Mayor Brian Stumpf: In accordance with 39 C.F.R. 241.4, this is the united States Postal Service's final decision with respect to the Postal Service's proposal to relocate retail services from the above referenced Post Office to the Carrier Annex building located at 206 E 711 Street. The Postal Service discussed the proposal with you on October 27, 2016 and at a December 7, 2016 public meeting. The Postal Service has carefully considered all of the concerns expressed in those discussions, as well as in appeals and comments received after the public meeting. Due to the need to optimize the current spaces it leases and owns, the Postal Service has decided to proceed with the relocation. The majority of issues from the meeting and letters written to the Postal Service were concerns over the carrier annex's convenience from the downtown location, parking availability, lack of sidewalks along 71h Street and the potential increase of vehicular traffic on r Street as well as intersection congestion at 7`h Street and Pine Street. The Postal Service has weighed all the concerns and believes it is in the best interest of the community and the Postal Service to combine the retail and carriers for better service and decreased costs. Several of the concerns expressed by the community will be addressed before the facility is relocated. The Postal Service plans to add parking to the new location. Additionally, the city is reconstructing the intersection at T" Street and Pine Street to improve traffic flow and add left turn lanes for easier use. The Postal Service anticipates providing the same services at the new location as are currently provided to our customers at the existing location. Additionally, the Postai Service plans to continue services at the existing Post Office until the replacement facility is open and operating as a Post Office. While the Postai Service is sensitive to the impact of this decision on its customers and the Monticello community, the Postal Service properly considered community input and this decision is consistent with Postal Service objectives. Postal Service operations are not supported by tax dollars. To be self-sustaining, the Postal Service must make decisions that ensure it provides adequate and affordable postal services in a manner that is as efficient and economical as possible. This is the final decision of the Postal Service with respect to this matter, and there is no right to further administrative or judicial review of this decision. Sincerely, AW4 Torn A. Samra 475 UENFANT PLAZA SW WASHINGTON, DC 20260-1862 Www'USPS.COM Cedp "App"_ Wright County Economic Development Partnership Partnering for Opporlunilies January 17, 2017 Jeff O'Neil City of Monticello 505 Walnut St. Ste. 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Jeff, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your support of the Wright County Economic Development Partnership. We are excited you are partnering with us for 2017. This upcoming year will be a year of positive change and success. The WCEDP is working on a number of initiatives and will continue to provide valuable development seminars, support economic development across the board, and more. Please take a look at some of what the Partnership offers-- directly and indirectly supporting your business and our County. • Technical support to business start-ups, Business Retention & Expansion visits to existing companies, and identifying assistance requirements. We are now a satellite Small Business Development Center through SCSU! • Monthly development seminars-- topics that provide current information and networking opportunities to business owners and those interested in development in Wright County. • Supporting contractors, developers, and realtors readily find places for new commercial and industrial development in Wright County. • Marketing business opportunities in Wright County and generating leads that will result in new businesses in the County. • Acting as a resource for Wright County municipalities from EDA support to property listings to pertinent legislative updates. • Providing information and resources through our new directory, written reference materials, development seminars, and our website (fully redesigned). • Rejuvenated communication outlets, business resource guide, and marketing materials to better reflect Wright County and its businesses, communities, and citizens. Should you have any questions about the Partnership or suggestions for seminars please call me at (763) 477-3086 or email at dnorthaeen(@wriRhtpartnership.orR. The Partnership sincerely appreciates your support! Sincer D e Northagen Ex utive Director Todd Hoffman Chief Deputy Dan Anselment Captain Annette Habisch-Peterson Captain Sean Deringer Captain Pat O'Malley Jail Captain January 18, 2017 Wright County Sheriffs Office Sheriff Joe Hagerty 3800 Braddock Ave NE Buffalo, MN 55313 1-800-362-3667 Fax: 763-682-7610 Administration Dispatch Records Civil Warrants Investigations Jail Administration Victim Assistance 763-682-7622 763-682-7600 763-682-7630 763-682-7646 763-682-7688 763-682-7637 763-684-2381 763-684-4537 To: Wright County Law Enforcement Contract Cities Albertville, Clearwater, Cokato, Delano, Hanover, Maple Lake, Monticello, Montrose, Otsego, Rockford, South Haven, St. Michael, Waverly The Wright County Sheriff's Office will be conducting an informational meeting and tour of the Law Enforcement Center for our contract cities in order to introduce ourselves to newly elected officials and staff. This meeting will take place at the Law Enforcement Center located at 3800 Braddock Ave NE, Buffalo, on Wednesday, February 22, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. We'll have a meet and greet with coffee and treats beginning at 6:30 p.m. We will present briefly on the history of contract policing as well as the operations of our office. A tour of the LEC including the jail will follow. We plan to be finished by 9:00 p.m. If staff or elected officials have questions, please feel free to contact Captain Dan Anselment at 763-682- 7634 or me at 763-682-7616. Thank you, and we look forward to meeting old, as well as new friends. Joe Hagerty (320)632-9255 405 First Street SE Little Falls, MN 56345 January 13, 2017 Jeff O'Neill City Administrator City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 ifound.org Dear Mr. O'Neill, Mayor Strumpf and Council Members, We have received your 2017 appropriation, in support of the work of the Initiative Foundation, in the amount of $2,300. Thank you! Together, we work to build strong local economies and vibrant communities in Central Minnesota. Your investment supports economic development through business financing activities designed to create living -wage jobs, diversify economies and leverage private sector investment. Communities are strengthened through signature leadership training and capacity building programs, grants to local units of government and nonprofit organizations, early childhood initiatives, and scholarships. This work will provide lasting impact on the health of the region and the future of rural Minnesota. We truly value your partnership and your continued support. Sincerely, Matt Varilek President ® Powering Possible OOL Carrie Tripp Vice President for External Relations Lek U -c- " Z:: 7 -[T� t Equal opportunity lender, provider and employer.