City Council Agenda Packet 04-09-1979AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
April 9, 1979 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve Grimsmo
d
Councilmembers: Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Philip White ✓Q
Meeting to be taped. �S L�•l��ii✓"h
Citizens Comments.
1. Public Hearing - 1979-1 Improvement Project.
2. Consideration of I-94 Tri -Plaza PUD Development - McDonald's.
3. Consideration of Awarding Contract on Bids Received for Street Sweeper.
4. Consideration of Setting Rates for 1979 for Tree Removal and Tree
Replacement.
5. Consideration of Ratification of By -Law Change for the Monticello
Fireman's Relief Association.
6. Department Head Quarterly Meeting.
7. Approval of Minutes - March 26, 1979 regular meeting, March 27, 1979
special meeting.
Unfinished Business -
New Business -
State Audit
C
A
3
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
April 9, 1979 - 7:30 P.M.
..01-.'..0 rs rrese•r.t: lrve Zrimsmo, Fran Fair, Phil Uldto, nan blonigen, Y.en :Saua.
::enbers Absent: gone
1. Public licerinq - 1979-1 Improvement Project.
A 1:ublic hearing was held on the 1979-1 Improvement Project which covered
the following areas proposed for improvements:
AREA TO BE SERVED
Cocmercial Plaza 25 Area
(referred to as Area 2 in
:Ssl feasibility report dated
Fetruary 26, 1979)
eakwood Industrial Park Area
(refcrre-0 to as Area 3 in OSM
(,�asibility retort of
',•truary 2G, 1179)
r. 1 . 1'ulp Farm Property
,tcfein--i to as Area 4 in
f,aRibility report dated
,l,ra3ry 26, 1970)
.aurin, Hillside Terrace
TYPE OF I14PROVEKEldT
Sanitary Sewer and hater
Blacktop, Sanitary ::ewer and
Water
elacktol , Sanitary :a wt r and
Water
Blacktop, Sanitary rower. Water
and Culverts.
J m Badalirh, consulting engineer, reviewed with the Council tw Cour
arca.. of the 1'-179 Improvement Projact and explained the outimated assr5:7-
r.cr.ts for each area. It was the recommendation of the engineer to serve
:ommereial Plaza 25, known as Area N2, by extending sower and water down
r..e middle of Cedar Street, thus (wing able to serve Commercial Plaza 2!;
1 rul, rty and tho lroperty to the east of Cedar Street. The eatim•Atf.d
.,::i;;:ment pet lU." parcel for this alternative was apluaximatcly
Ir. :: arra referred to as Area X3 in the Oakwood Industrial Park, it wau
tetu:nnended that the blacktop road be extended from approximately 275' nortl.
,-f 1,%t G in Hock 1 of Oakwood Industrial Park southerly along Industrial
tik- to the corlarate city limits. Also, Mmdae Road would he black;s,I,
it.., irduatrial [rive westerly to Oakwood Drive. The interceptor sanitary
,-%or wauid extend from Chelsea Road along the lot lines of 3, 4, 8 c 'f
,Akwood Industrial Park to Dundee Road and then westerly extending all
rl.c way over to Highway 25 and the J.R. Culp Property. The water service
:as recommended to ho looped from Chelsea Road along Industrial Drive and
! urdas fioad hack up along Oakwood Drive to Chelsea Road.
1.3
Council minutes - April i, !97(,
In rv.tard:: to rhe Area 04 property, known as the J. R. Culp farm, the
ii:•; Enginver rvcontmended that the Dundas Road be extended in a
r.traiglht westerly direction until it meets Highway 25 at a right angle.
C This would provide a new access from Highway 25 into the Oakwood Indus-
t-rial Park area and also provide access through the Culp property.
... ...o final area discussed for improvements, the Lauring llillsid,.
A!ci_ion
was recommended for sanitary sewer, blacktop streets and
storm sewer facilities consisting of culverts and drainage ditches.
total estimated cost of the improvements to all four areas for the
1979-1 Improvement Project was estimated at $913,000 with approximately
$766,000 being assessed to the abutting property owners. The following
property owenrs affected by the improvements had the following comments:
Sam Peraro - indicated that he felt going along with the engineer's
recommendation of service Commercial Plaza 25 along Cedar Street would
I
e more reasonable since you would be able to serve both sides of the
street.
.._. Roger Gau - inquired as to the length of assessments he would be
:acrd with since his property is now a residential home and has no
plans for development. It was indicated to Mr. Gau that the council
could assess homestead property for up to 20 years rather than 10
Tears, the current assessment policy for newly platted subdivisions.
Dave Hoskins - inquired if he would be assessed for spwer since
it would not be available to his building, and he was informed that at
C,
the present time, he would only be assessed for water which would be
mad, available.
Nw. . John Lundsten - a property owner affected by thn extension of
Dundas Road, inquired, since his property is used for farming, whothor
ten years would be the maximum payoff time or whether he would be able to
receive a longer assessment period. The council did indicate that they
would not like to make any commitments for anything longer than ten years.
A motion was made by Phil MAA, seconded by man Blonigen and unanimoualy
earrieri to proceed with improving the following areas petitioned for:
A. Commercial Plaza 25.
B. Oakwood Industrial Park.
C. Laurinq Ilillaide Terrace.
. J. R. Culp property - contingent upon alk easements being obtained for
thin area
Ancthcr motion was made by Phil h1iite, seconded by Fran fair and undnimously
carried to serve Area "A" Commercial Plaza 25, using the, rucommendationu of
t!;o Clty rnnincer which weru alternate 03 along Cedar Street Iwinq able to
serve both aides of the road. Motion was mado by Non Maus, seconded lr;
Council Minutes -'April 9, 1979
Fran Fair and unanimously carried to servo the Oakwood Industrial -Park
as recommended by the engineer, which was alternate 44 using 'an inter-
ceptor sewer. Motion was made by Phil White, seconded by Ren Maus and
unanimously carried to serve the J.R. Culp [property by extending the
present nundas Road westerly in a straight line to eonncrt with Highway 25
an9 to ilace the utilities in this casement right-of-way. notion waa
made by Phil White, seconded by Fran Fair and unanimously carried to
serve the Lauring Hillside Terrace addition as proposed by the engineer
with a Rural type street with storm sower facilities being culverts and
drainage ditches. Finally, a motion was made by Phil White, seconded by
Fran Fair and unanimously carried to adopt a resolution calling for
plans and specifications on the 1979-1 Improvement Project to be prepared
by Orr-Scholen-Mayeron 6 Associates contingent upon the casements being
obtained for the Dundas Road extension over the Culp and Lundsten property
It was rioted by the Council that it was the consensus that homestead
property being served by these improvements would be granted possibly
20 -year payoff times rather than 10 years. It was also noted that
agricultural property or unplatted property being served by these
improvements would be discussed later at the assessment hearing in
determining whether the assessments would be spread over a period of
longer than ten years. (See Resolution 1979 q7)
-. Consideration of I-94 Tri -Plaza PUD Develoument - McDonald's Corporation.,
The McDonald's Corporation have submitted their final plana and specifi-
catione for going ahead with their project on Parcel "C" on the Monticello
^. 1-94 Tri -Plana property. Several items were discussed in rcgardo to the
Planned Unit Development, and they are as followsr
City Ordinances would require 77 parking spaces he provided on the parcel
for the restaurant. McDonald's plans propose 67 spaces, but Sam Peraro,
owner of the Tri -Plaza property hes Indicated that he would Ixm willinu
to uign an agreement allowing the 13 extra spaces locatc-d on the 0taniarc]
nil prol�orty to be used for parking at the McDonald's ro:,tsurant.
7:r second area of concern was in regards to the square fuotago of tho
krapesrd pylon sign for the restaurant. The actual surface arca of the
..i.qn proposed was 200 square feat when the open area between tbu "golden
arr`.es" in excluded. It wasp the staff's recommendation that tho open
ar.'a of the "golden arches" not be considered because of the larqu arca
.r.atc.1 there. It was felt by both the City Council and the Planninq
^cr: issjon members that there were various ways of looks-ny at t1As
:;1 a:, as to whether it met thu square footage requirum+'nta or not..
1.a i art of t'..0 Planned Pnit Uevelopmunt., a motion was made icy Fin ':aa..,
i-..r..in 1 1,1, l'an lllonlgen and unanimously carried to grunt Mefionald'6
C el oration a variance allowing their 2n0 square foot surfaced area
,i rr, a:+ i,roiosed.
rr % was also made by Phil White, seconded by Fran Fair and unanimt+,117
:ArtivA to approve the Planned unit Dovelopnutnt for McDonald'■ rostaurant
a„ irolnead provided a parking agreement is made with Standard Oil for 11
-la es and that the landscaping is In accordance with the re:osamendatian..
44 L.,s final site plan. It was also noted that the sign location for th.
-W f
Council Minutes - April 9, 1979
h-ylon sign would be in the northwest corner of the lot as proposed
1•y McDonald's.
v
1. ronsidcration of Awarding Contract on Bids Received for Street Sweeper.
t:rnday, April 9, 1979, at 2:00 P.M., bids were received Ear a new
street sweeper. The only bids received were from MacQueen Equipment
Company, as follows:
An Elgin -Pelican sweeper with gasoline engine $38,954
An Elgin -Pelican Sweeper with diesel engine $42,524
Delivery would be in approximately 150 days for both the above vehicles.
Bids were also received for the same diesel sweeper with a few extras
which would be available immediately at a price of $42,990.
Motion ❖as made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Phil White and unanimously
carried to award the bid to MacQueen Equipment Company for an Elgin
Pelican diesel with the extras in the amount of $42,990.
Potion was also made by Fran Fair, seconded by Ken Maus and unanimously
carried to authorize the City's staff to sell the old 64 Mobil sweeper
to Becker, Minnesota, who has offered $1,700 for the sweeper.
.'onvideration of setting Rates for 1979 for Tree RamovAl and Tren
L.': lacement.
An hart of the City's tree program, Dutch Elm di:.eaaed trees are rcm;ved
1,;• ' Le city of Monticello. The cost of the removed trees aro shared
!ointly by that resident, the City and the State of Minnesota through a
grant and aid program. In the past, the rasidant has also received a
free replacement tree. In the past, the City has charged a resident
:70.00 to remove a tree which included a free replacement tree. It was
now tccommended, duo to the increased labor cost and the cost of the
rellacenvrit trees by the City's supplier, Belson Trees of Zimmerman,
Minnesota, that a now foe schedule be sot up whereby the'l.ropurty owner
wo,aLl 1r' charged $90.00 for the tree removal, and also if a replacement
rr:.• is requested and that tree is on public property, the property
:;wnlr would Fay $15.00 towards the cost, and if it's on private property,
r:u• rel lacement tree would be 330.00 additional to the property owner.
r,,.- reason for the difference between private property and lublir, pro-
ro*. f.,r a re•l,lacemant tree in that the State grant program down make
i -::.la avallablo for replacement trees on public property, but would not
in any of the cost of the replacement tree on private propert,, .
rreusnan3v d, the new fee schedule would be as follows:
Resident 'a Share rtf: Public Property Private Prol,crty
Removal 9 90.00 $ 9O.U0
hrl•la_emn•ut 15.00 1U.nU
...:Al. RESIDENT'S SHARE :105.00 $12U. 00
4
r
Council minutes - April 9, 1979
Xotton was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Phil White and unanimously
carried to adopt the new fee schedules for tree removal and tree
replacements for 1979 under the Dutch Elm Disease program.
,. Consideration of Ratification of By-law Change for the }:ontieello
..remen's Folief Association.
The Monticello Firemen's Relief Association proposed a change in its
by-ldws whereby an individual will be eligible for partial retirement
benefits on reaching the age of 50 after a minimum of ten -years of
sen•ice has been put in with the department.
Currently, the by-laws do not allow for retirement benefits to be paid
to any individual unless the individual puts in 20 years with the fire
department and receives these benefits after reaching the age of
50 years old. The new proposal would permit partial retirement benefits
to be paid provided a person has at least ten years of service with
the fire department.
The primary reason for the change and also for the change in the Statutes
allowing for a lower length of service before retirement benefits are
paid is that sometimes an individual may be transferred through no choice
of his own and may have to retire from the local fire department. The
new retirement benefits would be based on a computation which is contained
in the State Statutes and would result in an individual receiving approxi-
mately ;2,622 after 10 years based on retirement benefits of $6,000 over
was mado by Phil White, seconded by Tran Fair and unanimoualy
carried to approve the by-law changes as proposed allowing for retire-
m,nt alter 10 years of service per State Statutes. This item was
.:,rtimgent upon approval of the Joint. Fire Board and the Monticello
Townghitr.
tjaiterly netartment (lead Meetinq.
:.,o following department (toads were in attendance at thp. Council meetin:f
a:;l ft:uussed various items with the City Councils
1>trblic workr Director - John Simola
nuildiny Inspector - Loren Klein
'tre Chief - Paul Klein
tl•rer.ontdtivu of Wright County Sheriff's rwpartn r;t
:its Administrator - Cary Wieber
3entur Citizens [lirector - Karen Manson
. ., of the it�•ms discussed by the Council were as follower
.•re % 'it•il Uefonme procedures were discussed with the new Civil Left r.t,
'u.,tnr, Loren Klein. The Fire Chief, Paul Klein, alv) inforserl tt.r.
.n,il that the roof at the fire hall is in had need nt rtpair anal it
as t°.c ;onsonsus of the Council to have Uro Building Irapa, for stud;
al'einatives to repairing the structure. In discussion with Karen Mar,sos,
- 5 -
Council Minutes - April 9, 1979
Senior Citizens Director, it was the Council consensus to have the
Building Inspector study the possibility of providing an overhang over
the front entrance of the Senior Citizens building.
7. A;,nroval of Minutes.
Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen and unanimcuS17
carried to approve the regular minutes of the Council held March 26, 1979,
and the special meeting held March 27, 1979, as presented.
S. Miscellaneous.
The City Council members briefly discussed the audit petitioned for by
some of the property owners within Monticello. Some of the Council
members indicated that through people they have talked with, there
sec ms to be an indication that the people were told that an audit had
never been done in the City for the past 20 years, which is not the
case. It is true that a State audit has not been done for a long
period of time, but the City is audited by a private CPA firm annually,
and has been for the past five years. As a result, the Council could
not determine what areas the petitioners seemed to be requesting further
review of. Being that the Council, as a whole, has no control over
whether an audit is performed or not, no further action was taken by the
City Council.
Meeting adjourned.
Richard woltstoller
Assistant Adminintrator
EW/ns
Preliminary Outline
Wednesday, June 13 — General Conference
9 a.m.
Welcome
9:15 to
Aevnote — Economic and
10:30 a.m.
Demographic Challenges to Cities
10:45 a.m.
Concurrent Workshop Tracks
to 12 noon
—Overview:
11:45 a.m.
City's Role in Development
Dollars and Sense of City
Operations
Volunteers in City Government
12 noon
Luncheon—Exhibit Area
to 1 p.m.
1 to 5 p.m. Workshop Tracks,
Continued—Specific Topics
5:30 p.m. City Night Reception
Sponsored by City of
Bloomington
Thursday, June 14 — General Conference
8 a.m.
General Breakfast
A lively session on a lupin tit
general interest, sponsored by
L�
Women in City Government
9:30 to
Concurrent Workshops:
11:45 a.m.
The. Price of Personnel
The Questions of Overlapping
lutisdit'lions
legislative Update
12 noon
.Assoriadon Lunt henns
2:30 p.m.
:Nnnual Meeting
3:30 to
Mock Counril Merging
5:30 p.m,
3:30 to
Table Talk
6 p.m.
6 p.m.
Reception Butrrt
Friday, June
15 — General Conference
8 to sl ,t.m,
lahle Talk
9 to
•Citiv, and the Challenge ut
11;45 a nt.
the Media
•rr., .. op-,,
(die. era, deh.ew
1: noun to
1:30 p.m.
Luncheon Banquet
` 1;45 to
Media track, Continued
-i 3 p.m.
(large Cilie')
April 1979
Friday, lune 15 — Small Cities Day
(AIL sessions open to General Conference
delegates)
8 to 9 a.m. Table Talk
9 to Concurrent Workshops:
10:15 a.m. Self -Insurance
Police Licensing
llected Official's
Rule in financial
Monitoring
10:30 to Concurrent Workshops:
11:45 a.m. Special City Liabilities
The Price of Personnel
Legislative Update
12 noon to Luncheon Banquet
1:30 p.m.
1:45 to General Session:
2:45 p.m. Bringing Your Conference
Investment Back Home
2:45 to Concurrent Workshops:
4 p.m. Municipal Liquor
Energy Issues
Media Track, Continued
(Small Cities)
Association meeting schedule will be published in a
later issue. Call (612) 222-7409 for information
currently available.
SEMINARS FOR FIIICIIVI LOCAL COVERNMFNI
How to Hold Public Hearings
April 5, 1979
i
Policy Making: Defining the Public's
Role In the Public's Business
April 9, 1979
Getting Organlred lot Efliclent
Service Delivery I
April 9, 1979
Assessing Community Needs for Long
Range Planning
April 19, 1979
Parliamentary Procedure
April 25, 1979
Cn-sponusfed by Guvernrnent lraininq Service and
Depanmenl of Confemn(m. University of Atinne-
Sola,
1'or information, call 1612) 22'.7409
• .an .• �.,,�.. 'e '+,. tat •• ���• � � <, -
a ••.'j ��� /fig 1
'. , • ' �v;r, • '�,. � ... °,�►',✓ mac-,
Tl
RNO,9
7 t
._..._.-.rte+..... ---«....¢_...t...t.....»_................,. �+'@"���� 'a�f•�� �' 3p.
t�
•
fRo � UUT.:
4TEfC s
ou Tom• ,,4
nou r� S
/C
Fav
c{t/ $ri-eef3
.4rq.ns%rCnn,3 i"hiw lG•�n�i.
.7"hrw okAle,c
/a A.1 /r4ce
Ca «.d
7rt
��-
F}I��.
I I
�
-
hlr
12f� 2S ao
t� .600 q' [,9t»
o
1lErUJ Im.wi
1451>
3}+[ %OD jSv r%40Qi
j�i?t I zcooJ
ga3
'�
o
�EFcA�t irRct;
M 2r 42 tau
3Sa I/O Zpp 3.5b to .
3 Sb! /° ZOO
P! PtAl l- (408,
z l o'a A900
1s14alowi
`•%nRnDRn,N y:�'r�
SW-.67612--44
ICA 7,aaa
' 3,c»o 3 3'0�0.
.
3 3
En
Ta-r'RemAAt
".
27 ; S,l� �
/� . 3, av,
4� 4s'O
A7"kr 671, hgaeK
—
; ---- I --
140' ,4'/7 o" 0
—
r
r l�da:8 �I�EPJt^AcE
—77
AJ
4�4,bct--,
,243, 7w
>
W
I
AGENDA SUPPLEMENT
t
1. Public Hearing - 1979-1 Improvement Project.
This Public Hearing covers the following areas and improvements:
AREA TO BE SeKV£D TY^E OF IMPROVEMENT
Commercial Plaza 25 Area Sanitary Sewer and Water
(referred to as Area 2 in
OSM feasibility report dated
February 26, 1979)
Oakwood Industrial Park Area Blacktop, Sanitary Sewer and
(referred to as Area 3 in OSM Water
feasibility report of Feb-
ruary 26, 1979)
J. R. Culp Farm Property Blacktop, Sanitary Sower and
(referred to as Area 4 in Water
OSM feasibility report dated
February 26, 1979)
Lauring Hillside Terrace Blacktop, Sanitary Sewer, 4Mtar
and Culverts
Total cost of the project based upo;i,,tA% engineer's recommendations for
the various alternatives would be $951,500. Of this amount, 57�AS 9, 7��• Yo
or approximately f!,Wyy1j be proposed to be assessed, and the
remaining portion of S 460, or approximately 4x, would be put on
ad valorem or general property taxes. IG IL
Primary purpose of the public hearing is to inform those property owners
who aro proposed to be assessed on this project of the nature of the
improvements, cost, method of assessments, and allow for input from those
property owners. Ono possible way to proceed would be to have John
Badalich, the city engineer, review the project with the various altor-
natives, allowing the City Council opportunity for questions and answers,
and then opening up discussion for public input.
For your information, all property owners that could be possibly aasassed
using the various alternatives have boon directly notified of the hearing.
it should be pointed out that while the assessments and the number of
years over which the City collects the aesessmonts aro not finalized
until after the improvement project is completed, and then is subject
to a public hearing again at that data, property owners will be very
much interested in the assessment policy adopted by the City Council and
their plans for assessing the project. At our last meeting, it was
decided to allow now subdivisions such as Oakwood Industrial Park,
Commercial Plaza 25, louring Hillside Addition, and the J.R. Culp Farm
(which at this point still has not boon subdivided) up to ton years to
pay off the assessments with the stipulation that assessments be paid
in full at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on any
particular parcel. Additionally, it was discussed at our last mooting
N
Council Agenda - April 9, 1979
that other parcels which either have homes or structures on them and have
not been recently platted, that is a part of a new subdivision, could be
granted up to 20 years for repayment of the improvement. This would cover
such property owners as Gary Corrow, Roger Gau, and Stuart Hoglund, for
example. These particular property owners have indicated that they might
not necessarily be in favor of the project and some concern was specifi-
cally expressed with the number of years which they may have to pay off
the assessments.
After the Council received public input from the audience, it should
consider the following items:
1. Whether to serve the various areas.
2. What particular route should be taken to serve any areas approved
for improvements.
3. Authorize the initiation of plans and specifications for the
areas approved by the City Council, contingent upon obtaining any
necessary easements. It should be pointed out that the Commercial
Plaza 25 area and Iauring Hillside Terrace area can be served with-
out obtaining any easements whatsoever, since the improvements will
go within right-of-ways. However, in the case of Oakwood Industrial
Park, it will be necessary to obtain an easement for the interceptor
sewer between Chelsea Road and Dundas Road, however, I see this as
no problem since Oakwood Industrial Park has been very cooperative
in the past in granting the City easements. However, in the case of
serving the J.R. Culp area, it will be necessary to obtain easements
from three property owners, who, at this time, appear to be in favor
of the project, but it will be necessary to obtain easements before
plans and specifications should begin. As a result then, the engineer
could already start on plans and specifications for the Inuring
Hillside Terrace addition, the Commercial Plaza 25, and possibly
Oakwood Industrial Park.
It should be mentioned that it is possible to servo the J.R. Culp pro-
perty without the submission of a preliminary plat or final plat, since
the City could obtain an casement for the right-of-way similar to what
had been previously done in IBuring Hillside Addition. In this fashion,
the City would obtain a right-of-way for the road and the utilities prior
to the submission of any plats, and any land platted would be just around
this right-of-way area.
Additionally, it should be pointed out that once sanitary sower abuts
a particular parcel, it is necessary to hook up to sanitary sower within
three years. This question may come up at the hearing on Monday night.
There io no requirement for mandatory water hookup.
In toms of the alternative routes mentioned in the feasibility report
of Orr-Gcholon-Mayoron 5 Associates dated February 26, 1979, it appears
that the route for the Oakwood Industrial Park area and to servo the
J. R. Culp farm aro pretty wall agreed upon. Additionally, there was
only one alternative for the louring Hillside Terrace. The only quos -
tion in terms of routes that seems somewhat complicated is the route
- 2 -
Council Agenda - April 9, 1979
to serve the Commercial Plaza 25 area. This area can be served from
Old Highway 25, or from New Highway 25. Initially, the recommendation
of the engineer was to serve the Commercial Plaza 25 area down Old
Highway 25, and thereby being able to serve both sides of the street.
However, if some of the property owners are still opposed to the project
in this area, consideration could be given to serving Commercial Plaza 25
down New Highway 25. This would result in a greater assessment per
parcel.
It would also seem that for the improvements planned that no frontend
money would be necessary prior to the approval of plans and specifi-
cations at this time since the only new area or new subdivision would be
the J.H. Culp Farm and a frontend money would be required when utilities
were sent directly into that parcel.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of calling for plans and specifications
contingent upon obtaining the necessary easements, if
any.
REFERENCES: See OSM Report on the Lauring Hillside Addition and the
OSM report dated February 26, 1979. (Brown report 5 Yellow report)
2. Consideration of I-94 Tri Plaza PUD Development - McDonald's.
McDonald's has submitted their final plans and specifications for going
ahead with their project on Parcel "C" of Sam Peraro's Monticello I-94
Tri -Plaza, at the intersection of Oakwood Drive and Highway 25.
Several items ware discussed and resulted in recommendations at the
special Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday, April 3, 1979.
They wore as follows:
According to our ordinance, there should be 77 parking spaces provided
on the parcel where McDonald's is going to be located. McDonald's are
proposing 67 spaces. John Uban, of Howard Dahlgren Associates, suggested
that as long as there aro 13 extra spaces on the Standard Station parcel
and in consideration that one of the benefits of a PUD is shared parking,
that if McDonald's could secure an agreement from the standard Station
owner to allow McDonald's customers to park on their property, it would
be a solution to the required parking need. Mr. Peraro was present
and consented to such an agreement, and stated the agreement could be
made prior to issuance of the building permit. Therefore, the Planning
Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval for the parking as
proposed.
John Uban also proposed some minor changes concerning extension of curb-
ing along a few areas of the parking lot, and a radius change from
20' to 25' along the entrance to the parcel which is also of minor
significance. These areas aro shown on the enclosed map drawn in with
red marker, along with the shared parking area at the Standard Station
and the proposed location for the pylon sign. The planner suggested
that the sign be moved from its proposed location to the curbed area
a created on the parking lot. The Planning Commission voted unanimously
to recommend those items also.
- 3 -
Council Agenda - April 9, 1979
An item of conflict among the Planning Commission members was the square
footage of the pylon sign. It was a staff recommendation that the open
�.� area of the "Golden Arches" not be considered because of the large area
created there. This recommendation was based on the configuration of
the sign and the fact that the open area constituted approximately 110
square feet. Actual surface area of the sign is 200 square feet when
the open area of the "arches" is excluded.
The McDonald's representative was in concurrence with all the recom-
mendations, except that their sign be accepted as proposed, for two
basic reasons. The first being that they only have two sign sizes
and the other sign size is very small. They also feel that a large
sign is necessary because the City of Monticello in itself is too small
to support the business volume McDonald's needs, and they need to rely
heavily on the freeway traffic for business, and feel the small sign
isn't large enough to attract the amount of business they would need
to attract. A tie vote was reached, (one member was absent), on the
motion to deny the request for the large sign.
For your information, square footage of building is 3,496 (28'x92').
Exterior is combination of brick and wood.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approval of PUD with sign and
parking provisions as proposed.
REFERENCES: Enclosed copy of plan. A landscaping plan is
available at City Hall.
3. Consideration of Awarding Contract on Bids Received for Street Sweeper.
On Monday, April 9, 1979 at 2:00 P.M. in the afternoon, bids will be
opened for a new street sweeper as previously authorized by the
Monticello City Council. It should be noted that it isn't necessary
for any members of the Council to be at the bid opening, but they are
certainly welcome to attend if they wish to do so.
By Monday evening's meeting, the bids will be tabulated and reviewed
with the City Council and a contract will be awarded for the street
sweeper. Estimated cost of the sweeper will be in the area of around
$43,000.
The City of Monticello has boon offered $1,700 for its 1964 Mobil
sweeper by the City of Becker. It should be noted that this sweeper
was purchased in 1973 at a cost of $6,G45, and its trade-in value is
nil. MacQuoon Equipment Company indicated that anything the City
received for it in the area of $1,500 to $2,000 would be a plus
since no value would be granted on the sweeper as a trade-in.
POSSIBLE ACTION, Consideration of awarding contract based upon bids
received for a stroot sweeper, and consideration of
the sale of old street sweeper to the City of
Becker for 61,700.
- 4 -
Council Agenda - April 9, 1979
4. Consideration of Setting Rates for 1979 for Tree Removal and Tree
Replacement.
As part of the City's tree program, Dutch elm diseased trees are removed
by the City of Monticello. Cost of the removed trees are shared jointly
by the resident, the City and the State of Minnesota through a grant and
aid program. Additionally, in the past a resident had received a free
replacement tree in place of the tree that had been removed.
Due to the increased labor cost and the cost of trees by our supplier,
Nelson Trees of Zimmerman, Minnesota, it is suggested that the City's
current fee of $70.00 to a resident for removal with the inclusion of
a free tree be replaced with a fee of $90.00 per tree removed and also
if a tree is requested to be replaced, that the property owner share
$15.00 of the cost if it's on public property, and $30.00 of the cost
if it's on private property. Reason for the increased cost to the
resident if it's on private property is that the State, in its grant
and aid program, does not make funds available for replacement trees
on private property, but will fund half of the cost of replacement
trees on public property. Public property includes the boulevard,
for example. All property owners are responsible for trees removed
on their land and the abutting boulevard.
Listed below is the City of Monticello's cost broken down for removal
and for replacement and it also shows the shared cost if the suggested
fee schedule were proposed:
Public Private
Property Property
Removal
Resident's share $ 90 $ 90
State's share 145 145
City's share 90 90
Removal Cost $325 $325
Replacement
Resident's share $ 15 $ 30
State's share 30 -9-
City's share 15 30
Replacement cost $ 60 $ 60
GRAND TOTAL $385 $385
Aa you can see per the above schedule, the City of Monticello and the
resident shares equally in the cost of removal and replacement. On
removal, the State's share is 45% and the proposal would have the
resident pay 2710 and the City paying 271%. On replacement, the
State's share on trees replaced for those taken out on public property
would be 50% with the City and the resident sharing the remaining
C balance equally. On private property, the replacement cost would be
shared equally by the City and Resident since the State does not take
caro of any of trees removed in private property with a replacement tree.
5
Council Agenda - April 9, 1979
It should be noted that the average cost per tree removed by the City
of Monticello of $325 is quite high, but the reason for this is that
property owners who are sent the notice are given the choice of either
removing the tree themselves, or having the City crew remove it.
Oftentimes, where the tree is rather simple to take out, the resident
will opt to take the tree out himself. As a result, the City gets
left with the trees that are quite complicated to remove.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of adoption of fee schedule for
trees removed in 1979.
5. Consideration of Ratification of By -Law Change for the Monticello
Firemen's Relief Association.
The Monticello Firemen's Relief Association is proposing a change in its
by—laws whereby an individual will be eligible for partial retirement
benefits on reaching the age of 50 after a minimum of ten years service
has been put in with the department.
Currently, the by-laws do not allow for retirement benefits to be paid
to any individual unless the individual puts in 20 years with the fire
department and receives these benefits after reaching the age of 50
years old. The new proposal is in accordance with a change in the
statute which would permit partial retirement provided at least ten
years of service were put in with the fire department. Currently, the
fireman receives a lump sum benefit of $6,000 after 20 years of service
and receives additionally $300 per year for every year put in over 20
years of sorvice. Under the current by-laws, no benefits are paid if
an individual puts in 10 years of service and quits the department for
whatever reason.
Reason for the change and also for the change in the statutes is that
of tontimas an individual may be transferred through no choice of his own
and may have to retire from the fire department. In some cases, the
individual may have been with the fire department for 18 or 19 years and
no benefits would accrue to him under the old by-laws. An a result of
the new provision, an individual would not receive half of the $6,000
benefit accruing to him after 20 years, but would receive $2,622.
This figuro is based on a computation that is contained within the
State Statutes which allow indiviAual firemon to adopt this amendment
to their by-laws.
For your information, the Firemen's Relief Association is funded through
State aid, which is a portion of the insurance premium everybody pays
when they gat fire insurance coverage which is sent into the State and
rodistributod to Piro Relief Associations throughout the State. In
addition to the State aid, the Firemen's Relief Association is funded
through interest earned on its investments, plus a local property tax
mill levy. According to my computations, it would not be necessary to
increase the City's local share of the Fire Relief Association if
this provision wore adopted. As a result, it would have no impact on
property taxes payable in Monticello.
- 6 -
C
Council Agenda - April 9, 1979
This provision, if adopted, would require the approval also of the
Monticello Township since the fire district is a joint fire district.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approval of recommended changes in
the by-laws, contingent upon subsequent approval by
the Monticello Township.
6. Department Head Quarterly Meeting.
Since this is the first meeting of the new year, all department heads
have been notified of the department head quarterly meeting. Following
are the department heads who will be at Monday night's meeting:
Public works Director - John Simola
Building Inspector - Loren Klein
Fire Chief - Paul Klein
Representative of Wright county Sheriff's Department
City Administrator - Gary wieber
Senior Citizens Director - Karen Hanson
It should be pointed out that this is rather an informal session and
no particular format or reports are presented. For your information,
April 9th will be John Simola's first meeting, and he will of course
also be at the Council Meeting.
- 7 -
MINUTES
f
SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLo PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, April 3, 1979 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Fred Topel, Dave Bauer, Ed Schaffer, Jim Ridgeway.
Loren Klein (ex -officio).
?!ember Absent: Dick Martin.
1. Consideration of I-94 Tri -Plaza PUD Development - McDonald's.
The McDonald's Corporation submitted their final plans and specifications
for going ahead with their project on Parcel C of Sam Peraro's Monticello
I-94 Tri -Plaza at the intersection of Oakwood Drive and Highway 25. A
number of areas were discussed by the Planning Commission with the
representative of the McDonald's Corporation, and they were as follows:
The Site Plan submitted with the PUD development proposes 67 parking
spaces, while the City ordinances indicate there should be 77 parking
spaces provided on the parcel. It was recommended by the City Planner,
of Howard Dahlgren Associates, that as long as there are extra spaces
available on the next parcel, which is the Standard Service Station,
that if McDonald's could secure an agreement from the owner, Sam
Poraro, to allow McDonald's customers to park on these 10 spaces, it
would be a solution to the required parking needed. Mr. Peraro
indicated that such an agreement would pose no problem as far as he
is concerned, and could he made into a written agreement.
The Planner also indicated that soma minor changes concerning the
curbing in a few areas of the parking lot should be incorporataA into,
the now site plan. In addition, the Planner suggested that the sign
be moved from its present location in the northwest corner of the lot
to the middle of the parking lot.
The item that received the most discussion by the Planning Commission
was the square footage of the now pylon sign proposed by McDonald's.
It was the staff recommendation that the open area of the "golden archaa"
not be considered as part of the square footage allotment for the sign.
If the open area created by the "golden arches" was eliminated, the
actual surface area of the sign would be 200 square feet or lass which
is what is allowed by the City ordinances. The McDonald's representative
Indicated that the majority of the items would pose no problem in rouards
to parking spaces, location of the sign, curb barrier extensions, but
requested that their sign, as proposed, he accepted. They indicated
that this large sign in necessary because the City of Monticallo, in
itself, is too small to support the business volume that McDonald's
needs, and that they must rely heavily on freeway traffic for their
business.
Considerable Planning Commission discussion cantered on whether the omen
f space in the sign should be included in the square footage allotment,
or whether it could be reasonably determined that the open space between
thn arches need not be counted in determining square footage, which in
this case would allow the sign to meet the ordinances. After the
Planning Commission Minutes - 4/3/79
1e:1gtl:y discussion, motion was made by Dave Bauer and seconded by
FA Schaffer to approve a variance recommending that the sign area
of the sign proposed be allowed. Voting in favor: Dave Bauer and
Cd Schaffer. Opposed: Jim Ridgeway and Fred Topel. Since the
vote was tied, notion for approval was denied. It was noted that
the reason for opposition to this sign was that in the past the
Planning Commission was previously looked at the total outside area
of a sign when determining the square footage of a sign, and in this
case, they felt the sign would be approximately 280 square feet by
taking the outside of the "golden arches" as part of the sign.
motion was made by Fred Topel, seconded by Ed Schaffer and unanimously
carried to approve the balance of the PUD for McDonald's as proposed,
provided all the previous changes are implemented in .regards to parking
spaces, curb barrier alignment, etc.
2. Public Hearinq on the Preliminary Subdivision Plat of the Meadows by
Jim Maus.
Mr. Jim Maua presented the preliminary plat foro.his land located north of
Prairie Road on the western edge of Monticello. The Plat consists of
30 acres and would have.a total of approximately 64 single family residential
lots.
The plans have been sulmitted to the City Engineer for study and since no
comments at this time have been received in regards to the plat from the
C City Engince:-, motion was made by Dave Bauer, seconded by Fred Topel and
unanimously carried to table any discussion on this preliminary plat
until the unginerr has made his written recommendations in regards to
the plat.
11.!Arinq no other business, motion was made by Erod Topel, aeconded by Ed
Schaffer and unanimously carried to adjourn.
Rick Wolfatellur
i,ssintant Administrator
RW/aa
I
OFFICERS OF THE MONTICELLO FIRE DEPT.
President — Jim Maurice
Vice President --- Elwood Haaland
Secretary — Lee Trunnell
Treasurer — Willard Anderson
Chief -- Paul Klein Joint Committeeman — Lee Trunnell
Assistant Chief — Gordon Link Training Officer — Willard Farnick
The following is a quarterly report of the Monticello Fire Department from Jan. 1, 1979
thru March 31, 1979.
There were 21 personal assists by the Chief and/or assistant chief.
There were 9 fires which required 312 man hours. The average attendance at a fire
was 17.5.
During the past three month period there were 4 training sessions which required 146 man
hours. The average attendance at these training sessions was 20.75 men.
The Dept. manned a booth at Expo '79. We showed a film and served free coffee at the
booth.
Also, 3 men attended 6 hours of state instructed training classes at Buffalo Fire Hall.
DK/bjk
Respectfully submitted by,
David B. Kranz
Reporter
Telephone 295.2711
City of �Monficello
250 East Broadway
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
MEMORANDUM
TO: Monticello City Council
FROM: Gary Wieber, City Administrator 516
DATE: March 22, 1979
SUBJECT: Special Meetinq with IndeRendent School District Board
on Tuesday, March 27, 1979, at 8:00 P.M., Oakwood School
Me— Line 1335739
Enclosed for your reference, is a copy of a memorandum that was previously
handed out relative to background pertaining to the Memorial established
by Worth Brasio for a library in Monticello.
Somewhere down the road, if a new library in to be built or the present
one remodeled, the question may come up relative to the possible funding.
It came to my attention that Wright County had allocated a certain portion
of revenue sharing funds to Howard take for a library. This was somewhat
clarified when I talked to Ozzie Arlien, Wright County Administrator, who
indicated that the County, as of yet, had not officially authorized an
allocation to Howard lake, but quite likely would approve of utilizing
$10,000 of County federal revenue sharing funds towards furnishing a
new Howard Lake library. He pointed out that the funds were for fur-
nishings of the library, and not the building itself. Furthermore, he
indicated that quite likely Monticello could receive favorable reception
if the Council would request a like allocation from Wright County.
Obviously, this request may never come to pass, but i only mention it
hero for your information.
Main purpose of Tuesday night's meeting will be for an exchange of
information and for the two governing bodies to discuss each others
feelings towards necessity of a library, the necosoity of an expanded
facility, and who is the proper agency to provide library facilities.
it would seem to me that before any concrete decisions can be made, the
determination would have to be made by the School Board relative to the
use of the Oakwood site. As you are aware, there are some problems that
have to be ironed out relative to the memorial fund established by
Worth Brasio.
GW/ns
wo11o,ne to Ifflonfice((pa ... little Mountain —� "
MEMORANDUM
TO: File L-50-8 Worth Brasie Memorial Library Fund
FROM: Gary Wieber
DATE: January 30, 1979
SUBJECT: Review of Matters Pertaining to the Memorial Established
by Worth Brasie.
In reviewing the City's files and documents relative to the Library, following
are significant items:
DATE SOURCE ITEM
Approx. 1920 Copy of Condensed History of Monticello resident, Worth Brasie, provided
Wright County by C. A. French in his Will a legacy of $10,000 to be used
to erect a public library building in
Monticello village. At this time, $10,000
was not sufficient for the erection of a
suitable structure. The amount was put
at interest until it accumulated to about
$14,000. Ground was given to erect library
l building by Independent School District #7
and in 1930, the building was erected.
3/1/28 Resolution of Independent Resolution reads in part: "it would seem
School District 07 passed feasible and desirable to combine said
March 1, 1928. library building with a now addition to
be constructed to the high school in said
village, in order that said library building
with an annex thereto may be used for a
dual purpose, to wit. that of public library
and school purposes, and if this be done,
the school district to have the burden of
upkeep, maintenance and operation, as well
as to donate the site for said library
which shall be on the present site of the
high school and adjoining the same.
5/2/28 Copy of notice of special Copy of notice of special election to be
election. hold by the Independent School District 117
on the 22nd of May, 1928, to issue bonds in
the amount of $50,000 for the following
purposo: Conatructing and furnishing an
addition to the school house in said dia-
triet and installing heating, ventilating
and plumbing therein and equiping the same
with librarl0c,apparatus ,and other school
furniture.
L
Memo to File L-50-8
January 30, 1979
Page #2
DATE SOURCE
5/28/28 Copy of Independent School
District 47 Minutes.
7/17/28 Copy of Assistant Attorney
General Letter from Charles E
Phillips.
ITEM
Minutes reported that bond issue had passed
287 votes to 161 votes.
Letter is to Mr. Mons Hawkins, Monticello,
Mn. Mr. Phillips restates a question that
Mr. Hawkins apparently asked, that is as
follows: A sum of money was left to the
Village of Monticello for the purpose of
constructing a public library, and that
School District k7 located in said Village
is about to build a new school house; the
Village authorities and the school board
feel that it would be to mutual advantage
to both Village and district to build the
library in connection with the school house
and the question is how this may be accom-
plished. Mr. Phillips, in his reply, indi-
cates that currently there is no legal
authority for a school district to authorize
the construction of a building on school
property with said building to be the pro-
perty of the village. Mr. Phillips goes
on further to indicate that the only way
this possibly could be accomplished is
through legislative authority.
7/18/28 Copy of Minutes of Independent Minutes indicate that bids were received
School District 07. on the new school building and all were
above the referendum approved of $50,000.
Board rejected all bids and called for now
bids to be submitted July 27, 1928.
7/27/26 School Board Minutes - Indepen-
dent School District 07.
Minutes indicated that bids were accepted
as follows for the project: General
Construction - 546,415; Roofing - $1,563;
Heating 6 Ventilation - $15,315; Electrical -
$1,743; for a combined total of :,65,036.
By means of an insert in the Minutes, there
indicated that the bund issue is $50,000
plus the approximate amount of the legacy
$14,000 which would total $64,000. Apparently
the school board felt that they could accept
those hids, although the $65,036 total was
more than the bond issue amount plus the
approximate amount of legacy, but there was
no indication of the rationale behind this
vote.
Memo to File L-50-8
January 30, 1979
Page 03
DATE SOURCE
8/7/28 Letter to Independent School
District #7 from Members of
Building Committee those being
George B. Boyd, H. L. Wipple,
(unreadable third name).
4/29/29 Copy of Resolution adopted
by Independent School Dis-
trict V.
9/39/29 School Board Minutes
C
ITEM
Letter mentioned authority being received
by the Board from the Heirs at Law of
W. worth Brasie to the changes made in the
plans and specifications for the construc-
tion of said library in order to hasten
the construction thereof and to reduce the
cost of said building in consideration of
the fact that said library can be construc-
ted in connection with the new high school
building in said district at much less cost
than can otherwise be done. In the contents
of this letter, another letter of April 28,
1920 is mentioned, which Mr. Brasie appa-
rently wrote the officers and directors of
the three banks in Monticello relative to
the depositing of the $10,000 and for pro-
vision for future maintenance and upkeep
of said library. Members of the building
committee recommended that the school dis-
trict go ahead with the pians and specifi-
cations as amended and that they would
disburse the funds of the Brasie Memorial
fund as needed.
Resolution makes reference to the 1929 sea-
nion of the State Legiolaturo. Apparently
an act had passed which appears to be the
present Statute Section 134.03 which would
be applicable to the W. Worth Brasio !.iemo-
rial Library which is constructed on School
District Property and owned by the people
of oaid diotrict. As provided by this law,
the school board was named as ex -officio
members of the board and three additional
members ware appointed for the term of one
year. Apparently the law provided for the
construction of a library on school property,
said structure not to necessarily he owned
by the school district, and also required to
do this a board to be appointed.
A vote was panned to levy one mill for
library purposes for collection in 1930.
Memo to File L-50-8
January 30, 1979
Page 44
DATE SOURCE ITE4
6/9/69 Letter from Secretary of Letter is to indicate to the Village
Library Board, Elsie Garlid, to Council that public library board would
Mayor Sandberg. like to go on record as supporting a
regional library system now being proposed
for Wright County.
6/11/69 Copy of letter from Clerk Letter indicates that the June 10, 1969
Treasurer of Monticello, Village Council meeting unanimous approval
Lloyd Schnell, to Dave Douglas, was given for Wright County to become a
County Auditor. part of the Regional Library system.
6/7/72 Letter from Kra. Meryl
Lennartson, the Director of
the Great River Regional
Library System to Mayor
Sandberg.
11/14/72 Copy of Village Council
Minutes.
11/20/72 Letter Pram Clark of Indopen-
dent School District 4882 to
Village Clark of Monticello.
Requesting information relative to whether
library space would be available within the
community or whether mobile service would
be necessary if no space was available on
a permanent basis.
Resolution passed as follows: The Village
should enter into an agreement with School
District 4882 to rent the Worth Brasie
Memorial Library facility in conjunction
with the Great River Library Association
and pay rent of $75.00 per month for
services including light, heat, toilet
facilities, insurance, custodial service.
This contract to be negotiated on an annual
basis. At this same meeting, Loren W. Senneoo,
Superintendent of School District 4882,
stated the Village would have administrative
control of the facility, but the ownership
of the building would not be relinqueshod.
Lotter indicates that the school board
would offer the Public Library space to
the village at the rate of $75.00 per month
to cover heat, light, insurance, custodial
service and toilet facilities, provided that
the Village decided to join the Groat River
Regional Library System. Additionally,
the administrative responsibilities for the
operation of the public library would be
placed in tho hands of the Village of
Monticello through the Groat River Regional
Library Board.
Memo to File L-50-8
January 30, 1979
Page #5
DATE SOURCE
12/4/72 Resolution adopted by the
Independent School District
#882.
1/9/73 Copy of Village Council
Minutes.
2/27/73 Minutes of Village Council
Meeting.
5/15/73 Letter from Pon. lloffman to
Village Council of Monticello.
C
ITEM
Resolution indicated that all tangible
personal property now owned by the kbrth
Brasie Public Library in Monticello, which
is devoted to use for public library pur-
poses, is hereby contributed and transferred
to the Village of Monticello for further
transfer to the Great River Regional
Library, St. Cloud, MN. Furthermore,
that if the Regional Library System ever
be terminated, the assets of said regional
library will be distributed to the original
parties in the case of Monticello, the
kbrth Brasic Library in proportion to each
parties contribution.
Motion was made and approved to have an
inventory of all tangible property and cash
assets, if any, regarding the transfer of
the worth Brasie Library to the village of
Monticello.
Motion passed to hire W. C. Hoffman to
review the legal aspects of the transfer
of the Library, including the financial
ratters, and determine if an inventory is
necessary.
Hoffman's opinion indicates the following.
1. School District 0882 does not have the
power to transfer the Library to the
Village by Resolution, not does the
village have the power to accept the
Library.
2. Minnesota Statute 134.03 specifically
states that !�P' Library cannot be
abandoned k:W a4/3'rdo majority vote
of the electors cast at any annual
election or special school meeting called
for that purpose. (it should be noted
that 134.03 does have language pertaining
to Cities of lona than 2,000 inhabitanta.
3. If the school district levies a tax
for the worth Braoio Public Library, that
the property tax for that purpose is not
subject to a tax for a regional library.
Memo to File L-50-8
January 30, 1979
Page 86
DATE SOURCE
6/12/73 Copy of Village Council
Minutes.
7/9/74 Copy of City Council Minutes
4/24/78 City Council Minutes.
ITEM
Motion was made and unanimously carried
to have the administrator send a copy of
the William Hoffman letter to the Chairman
of the School Board stipulating the Village
will discontinue it's $75.00 monthly pay-
ment and that a request be made for refund
of funds already submitted.
Motion was approved to continue the agreement
with Independent School District $802 for the
operation of the worth Brasie Public Library
as originally agreed to at the Council meeting
of Uovember 14, 1972. As part of this agree-
ment, the City would resume its monthly payments
of $75.00 per month to the school district
commencing in July of 1974. It should be
noted this came somewhat as a result of a
settlement with the School District which was
negotiated which included other unrelated
matters including a sewer 6 water hookup
charge of $16,000 to the School District. As
part of this settlement, the School District
disregarded the $75.00 monthly payments
that were discontinued for a period of time.
Approval was given after presentation by
Superintendent Shelly Johnson of increasing
the monthly maintenance allowance on the
library from $75.00 per month, to $147.00 per
month.
IMPACT OF THE TAX COURT DECISION DECLARING
THE LIMITED MARKET VALUE LAY UNCONSTITUTIONAL -- WRIGHT COUNTY
MILL RATE
EXISTING 97.73
ADJUSTED 76.16
GROSS
TAX
-----------------------------------------------------
USING
USING
DIFFERENCE
LIMITED
ESTIMATED
-----------------------
MARKET VALUE
MARKET VALUE
AMOUNT
PERCENT
o267651
5575223
-692426
-11.05
45621
37136
-6664
-16.95
947626
63406
-113170
-11.94
4561463
6417o24
1636160
40.06
1133953
936702
-197251
-17.40
3404411
2715374
-7b9D36
-22.07
156257
163171
6914
4.43
0
D
0
.00
263194
220691
-02503
-22.07
0
0
0
.00
1b900a01
16900500
0
.00
MILL RATE
EXISTING 97.73
ADJUSTED 76.16
NET TAX
---------------------------------------------------
USING
USING
DIFFERENCE
LIMITED
ESTIMATED -----------------------
MARKET VALUE
MARKET VALUE
AMOUNT
PERCENT
4146003
3657352
-491451
-11.65
45621
37136
-0664
-16.95
650641
725063
-125776
-14.76
3035649
3955100
919451
30.29
1133953
936702
-197251
-17.40
3464411
2715374
-769036
-22.07
156257
163171
6914
4.43
O
0
0
.00
203194
220691
-62503
-22.07
0
0
0
.00
13136934
12410593
-726340
-5.54
IMPACT OF ELIMINATING THE LIMITED
MARKET VALUE --A SUMMARY BY COUNTY
AND TEN SELECTED CITIES
f . PROPERTY TAXES PAYABLE IN 1978
{ver.
�A
Prepared by,
Deportment of Revenue
Tax Research Office d
Local Government Aids and Analysis Division
March, 1979
i
IMPACT OF THE TAX COURT DECISION DECLARING
THE LIMITED MARKET VALUE LAY UNCONSTITUTIONAL -- WRIGHT COUNTY
-----------------------------------------------------
MARKET
VALUE
ASSESSED
VALUE
USING
USING
DIFFERENCE
---------------------------------------------------
USING
USING
LIMITED
ESTIMATED
-----------------------
LIMITED
ESTIMATED
--- -DIFFERENCE^----y
MARK0 VALUE
MARKET VALUE
AMOUIIT
PERCENT
MARKET VALUE
MARKET VALUE
AMOUNT
PERCENT
224607655
249314497
24706842
11.00
64132642
73204239
9071597
14.15
3777470
3928560
151098
4.00
468863
487617
18754
4.00
3128377
35352476
4067099
13.00
9698467
10959267
1260800
13.00
172206565
292887160
120600595
70.00
46879010
84265202
37386184
79.75
27077890
28702563
1624673
6.00
11602982
12299160
69617A
6.00
99278083
99216083
0
.00
35653626
35653626
0
.00
371b316
4982543
126422?
34.00
1598876
2142493
543617
34.00
0
0
0
.00
0
0
0
.00
b769431
6769431
0
.00
2897740
2897740
0
.00
0
0
0
.00
0
0
0
.00
566800787
721215323
152414536
26.80
172932214
221909348
48977134
28.32
41►' w Fir �; +;; r M : ti
Ix
no 1
U
W
W
d
W
0
cl
L�
20r-0'
no 4
q
h. 1
113 J!�' -` na5
A�
N
M7 no
I
SIGN HEIGHT
Il
�
Overall
I
Ix
no 1
U
W
W
d
W
0
cl
L�
20r-0'
no 4
q
h. 1
113 J!�' -` na5
A�
N
M7 no
I
SIGN HEIGHT
Grade
Overall
Clearance
Height
,_0„
8--u-
27.6.,
12'-0"
31'-8"
16'-0"
35'•6"
20-0"
38'-6"
J
I
'I
SIGN: 70-200
FOP PRICING AND INSGALLATIONNIINrOpMAIION CONTACT
AREA
AREA; Approximately 200s0� ft.C�—E
l0 1 CO 1 1..
STRUCTURE: DasKplod tot 30pst wind load
-
ELECTRICAL: Inspected and approved by U L.
400 Rivers Rood
NOTE: Order repWornonl panels by number as shown above
Centerville. Tenn&@" 67037
Area Code 16191 Y"4103
.e
CITY OF- MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY MINNESOTA
'e
As.,-- ---..v■.rr\, S�� it ... .,--`.\ q7q A�TBtM AwoS
� Sews. W►►��� \ -' .. .,, \ ,
i
�I � sTRECTs r �. •-..
SeWI• � tA%AfIR oN�y _ _ -, •' .! 1
1
� WATER ONW ®, '-. ,. 1' "•,
5 -TRUST ONL`i
e
Ao
-d B, �91
.,, -- -_II - - i - �---,moi .,e. + ,,,, ,,,, „. _
t e
97Y
3
4
T 24 -
AA,
r P 7
7 7.
4?, 4 444D lab
7 241
3
to 9/
1 J—
1
= T`I I I . I .. I ', '�I I � , i I I � 1 I'•m'/�,G 3.� `i -
2'c 2.31L
TT
/S74
-e. If llj
e
15
4 1 7-t.��� 11Z yrO{ I �' 1
-
w-- 4—., .r 1/17a
I� ItTF
2o
1 i' I i 1- Il I i i! 1_I_ I_! ►�,! I. I .__ I I I I I I �.
/oil � I� � I l� 1 �--SII II I � ;.,
xx ow
'age,17,4t, yj
15 R/ TF 1 WL%
- I I ,, � � � I ,�, . , l P� � I I , , ;I� s • ,-�
rT
-7- T-
20 '0
J7le'te
/e�
-4
32
37
J10 -cp .7sviv lay v
7 "1I—V 6