Loading...
HRA Minutes 02-01-1989MINUTES MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Wednesday, February 1, 1989 - 7:OOPM City Hall MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Al Larson, Lovell Schrupp, Ben Smith, Everette Ellison, and Tom St. Hilaire. STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill and HRA Director 011ie Koropchak. 1. CALL TO ORDER. Acting Chairperson Al Larson called the HRA meeting to order at 7:05PM. 2. APPROVAL OF THE JANUARY 3, 1989 AND JANUARY 17, 1989 HRA MINUTES. Ben Smith made a motion to approve the January 3 and January 17, 1989 HRA minutes, seconded by Everette Ellison, and with no further discussion the minutes stand approved as written by a 4-0 vote. 3. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE DISPOSITION OF LANDS TO BROADWAY SQUARE % LIMITED PARTNERS. Acting Chairperson Al Larson opened the public hearing to allow Interested persons to submit oral nr written comment for the transfer of raw lands from the HRA to developer, Broadway Square Limited Partners, raw lands described as Lot 1 exc Nly 30 ft, Block 51 Lot 2 exc Nly 30 ft 6 Lot 3 exc Nly 30 ft of W 24 ft 6 W 7 1/2 ft of Lot 4, Block 51 Nly 30 ft of Lots 1 b 2 b Nly 30 ft of W 24 ft of Lot 3. Also S 15 ft of Lot 15, Block 51 E 25 1/2 of Lot 4 d W 5 1/2 ft Lot 5, Block 51 Lot 5, Block 51, exc W 5 1/2 ft (50Mis-92) Original Plat. for the sum of Fifty-six Thousand Dollars (;56,000). With no public comment the public hearing was closed and the Acting Chairperson called for a motion. Lovell Schrupp made a motion that the HRA approve a resolution authorizing the tranfer of c the above described raw lands to the developers, Broadway Square Limited Partners, with the condition that a Development Agreement is developed and signed by the developers and the HRA prior to tranfer. Land cost tranfer is $56,000. Seconded by Ben Smith and further discussion included the possible funding of the project through the NRA excess funds created by the refinancing of tax increment bonds if no development HRA Minutes - 2(1189 3. CONTINUED. agreement is signed. No purchase deadline date was established between the NRA and the developer. With no additional discussion the motion passed 5-0 meeting the NRA original objectives of the project: 1) Provide opportunities for development and expansion of new busineass; 2) Provide opportunities for growth of the tax base; 3) Eliminate blight or deterioration within an area; 4) Create a use of ucrrently under-utilized land; and 5) Provide needed subsidized elderly housing. 4. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE AC4UISITI0N AND DISPOSITION OF LAND FOR TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 1-8. Acting Chairperson Larson opened the public hearing to allow interested persons to submit oral or written comment for the acquisition of raw lands from the City of Monticello to the HNA and the disposition of raw lands from the HRA to developer, Northern States Power Company. Raw lands described as Westerly 3.22 acres of Lot 4, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park, City of Monticello, Wright County. With no public comment the public hearing was closed and the Acting Chairperson called for a motion. Ben Smith made a motion that the HRA approve a resolution authorizing the transfer of above described raw lands from the City of Monticello to the HRA for the sum total of $21,200 and from the HRA to the developer for the sum total of $1.00 with the condition that a Development Agreement is developed and signed by the developers and the NRA prior to transfer. Seconded by Everette Ellison and with no further discussion the motion carried unanimously meeting the public interest: 1) It will discourage commerce, Industry, or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state; or 2) It will result in increased employment in the municipality; or 3) it will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality. 5. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW THE RESERVE FUND CREATED BY COMBINATION OF THE DISTRICT TIF PLANS AND".OR BY RELINOUISHING THE PLEDGE AGREEMENTS, AND TO REVIEW THE POTENTIAL REFINANCING OF TAX DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS. Mr. Pat Pelstring summarized the benefits of refunding bonds to the HRA member: 1) Reduce Debt Service; 2) Improve Cash Flow; 3) Free Up Excess Increment; 4) Repay General Fund Loans and Reduce General Fund Exposure; 5) Simplification and Administrative Efficiency; 6) Provide Necessary Financing for District No. 2, Proposed NSP Project and Future Projects More Efficiently. Refunding Bond Sources are bond sale, $1.2 million and Pledge Agreement, approximately $128 thousand. f Refunding Bond Uses are pay off of TIF City Loan #1, $20 thousand; Acting Chairperson Al Larson requested the HRA set policies/ guidelines for the use of TIF to assist the members with who should be granted the use of TIF (NSP, Construction Five, Martie Farm Service). Mr. Pelstring advised the HRA that an application form could be developed for preliminary screening. Roropchak informed the HRA members that we have such a form however city staff is somewhat negligent'wlth it's use. Pelstring briefly explained a process used in Woodbury. The use of TIF for industrial Is the most liberal because it's most competitive (if possible fund 13-18% of the project cost); commerical write down to market value and remaining balance is a loan, housing for the benefit of the people moving in (public benefit) request proforma analysis with the use of TIF and without the use of TIF. Use TIF for public improvements such as roadways on projects that are marginal. Commerical/retail use with public purpose of elimination of blight. The NRA has the authority to bulldabuilding but not with the use of TIF. Mr. Pelstring will develop and present a preliminary draft of guidelines/policies for the HRA at the March meeting. HRA Minutes - 2/1/89 ( Loan 02, $24 thousand; Loan 04. $100 thousand; refunds from TIF 03 bonds, $113 thousand; Bond 05, $364 thousand; Bond 06, $357 thousand; monies available for proposed Districts 02 and 08. $300 thousand; issuance cost, $25 thousand; Underwriter's Discount, $24 thousand; contingency $3 thousand. The cash fund use becomes a public policy decision to have excess monies. Return to the county, school, or hospital districts or reserve funds used for city projects such as elimination of blight. The excess $300 thousand is a savings on capitialized interest, need for no interest loans, and the availablity of monies for small projects. City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller stated that refunding bonds would simplify payments, the projected interest rate and the Issuance cost are a wash, terms match, bond market cost are positive for this year anyway, and provides flexibility for the HRA. Lovell Schrupp made a motion directing City Staff to proceed with the necessary steps for the relinquishing the Pledge Agreements and refinancing the District General Obligation Bonds inclusive of a recommendation to the City Council for approval. Seconded by Tom St. Hilaire, the HRA Was informed the City Council would need to hold a public hearing for the bond sale. With no further discussion the motion passed 5-0. L Dougherty Dawkins fees are contingent upon bond sale only. 6. CONSIDERATION TO REVTF.W POT,TCTF.S/GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF TIP. Acting Chairperson Al Larson requested the HRA set policies/ guidelines for the use of TIF to assist the members with who should be granted the use of TIF (NSP, Construction Five, Martie Farm Service). Mr. Pelstring advised the HRA that an application form could be developed for preliminary screening. Roropchak informed the HRA members that we have such a form however city staff is somewhat negligent'wlth it's use. Pelstring briefly explained a process used in Woodbury. The use of TIF for industrial Is the most liberal because it's most competitive (if possible fund 13-18% of the project cost); commerical write down to market value and remaining balance is a loan, housing for the benefit of the people moving in (public benefit) request proforma analysis with the use of TIF and without the use of TIF. Use TIF for public improvements such as roadways on projects that are marginal. Commerical/retail use with public purpose of elimination of blight. The NRA has the authority to bulldabuilding but not with the use of TIF. Mr. Pelstring will develop and present a preliminary draft of guidelines/policies for the HRA at the March meeting. HRA Minutes - 2/1/89 ( 7. CONSIDERATION TO DISCUSS POTENTIAL DEVELOPERS FOR QUALITY ELDERLY HOUSING. Mr. Pelstring informed the HRA that he knew of two potential developers who are interested in the concept of providing quality elderly housing as stated in the NRA goals. They have participated In similar projects. Ben Smith and Jeff O'Neill will identify areas within Monticello as potential sites by the next HRA meeting and Mr. Pelstring will invite the two developers to the HRA meeting. 8. CONSIDERATION TO ELECT THE HRA CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON. Ben Smith made a motion to appoint Al Larson as the HRA Chairperson for the remaining of his term, seconded by Everette Ellison the motion carried 4-1. Al Larson abstained. Lovell Schrupp made a motion to appoint Ben Smith as the HRA Vice Chairperson for a one year term, seconded by Everette Ellison the motion carried 4-1. Ben Smith abstained. 9. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE RECOMMENDED 1989 HRA GOALS. The HRA members reviewed the 1989 HRA Goals as recommended by Al Larson, Jeff O'Neill, and Koropchak. Chairperson Larson suggested his preference to use the word (blight in C place of slum) under Item C. With no further corrections or discussion Lovell Schrupp made a motion to accept the 1989 HRA Goals as presented and with the correction as stated by Chairperson Larson. Ben Smith seconded the motion which passed 5-0. 10. CONSIDERATION OF AN UPDATE TO TIF DISTRICT /5, CONSTRUCTION FIVE. At the City Council meeting, Koropchak requested the authorization for a feasibility study for the installation of the storm sever along the easterly boundary of Outlot A and Lauring Lane. John Simola still In opposition of the Outlot A storm sewer installation suggested the City Staff meet with Construction Five to determine adequate parking spaces wherebye the potential to reduce the length of the storm sever installation. A meeting date between city staff and Construction F.iveohas been set. City Council received Gus LaFromboise list of reasons by to use TIF for this project. 11. OTHER BUSINESS. None. 12. ADJOURNMENT. Everette Ellison made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Lowell Schrupp, the HRA meeting adjourned. 011ie Koropchak, HRA Executive Secretary