The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 04-14-1980AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL April 14, 1980 - 7:30 P. M. MAYOR: Arve Grimsmo COUNCIL MEMBERS: Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Dan Blonigen, Phil White. Meeting to be taped. Citizens Comments. 1. Continuation of Public Hearing on 1980-1 Improvement Project. 2. Consideration of Approval of Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor On -Sale License - Monticello Slow Pitch League. 3. Quarterly Meeting of Department Heads.F So"_1 GSVAVQ � 4. Consideration of Approval of Assignment of Securities for Deposits. Ic 5. Consideration of Final Payment to Arcon Construction. 6. Consideration of Setting Up Special Meeting on Workshop Session with the Planning Conmission on Monticello's Sign Ordinance. 7. Approval of Minutes - March 24, 1980 Regular Meeting. Unfinished Business - ry}� y v Wrightco Report. 0% New Business - %F CITY COUNCIL - 4/14/80 AGENDA SUPPLEMENT 1. Continuation of Public Hearing on 1980-1 Improvement Project. PURPOSE: Consideration of resolution ordering the preparation of plans and specifications for improvements for sanitary sewer and water along East County Road 75 and East County Road 39, plus proposed installation of storm sewer to serve Macarlund Plaza. This is a continuation of a hearing that was held March 24, 1980. This hearing was continued due to the fact that the City was not sure if it could sell municipal bonds in light of current market conditions and the fact that the statutory limitations prevented a city from exceeding the 7% limitation (see council update). Additionally, there was a concern from one of the proposed property owners to be assessed, Maurice Hoglund, relative to the future development of his property, and it was decided to defer action in order to allow him further time to review the matter since the City would be prevented from initiating the project anyway until the interest rate concern was resolved. Although the concern with the interest rate still has not been resolved, there may be some legislation that has taken place in the intervening period between the time of the writing of this agenda and Monday night, April 14, 1980. One possible solution to this aspect of the hearing if the interest problem were still not resolved but yet the legislature was still meeting, would be to adopt the resolution ordering the preparation of plans and specifications for the project contingent upon the state legis- lature adopting legislation which would allow the municipalities to exceed the present 7% limitation. In regard to the second reason for deferring action on the project, i have at this time not heard yet from Maurice Hoglund who indicated he would be getting back in touch with me relative to the proposed development of this project. Mr. Hoglund indicated that he would be having an engineering firm take a preliminary look at the 20 acres he owns on the east side of East County Road 39 to determine a layout. At our last meeting, the possibility of extending services to Macarlund Plaza from Mississippi Drive was discussed rather than proceed with the entire development along East County 39 and East County Road 75 should Mr. Maurice Hoglund not be in a position to support the improvement project at this time. Additionally, Mr. Hoglund indicated he might be interested in developing the parcel of land that lies north of his present residence on East County Road 75. and there would he the pnccibility of servicing this area at the same time, even though the larger improvement project - that is extension of utilities along East County Road 39 and East County Road 75 - would not be completed. As with the first hearing, all property owners proposed to be assessed on this project have been notified of the continued hearing. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of adoption of resolution ordering prepara- tion of plans A specifications on 1980-1 improvement project. If the legis- lature has not acted by the 4/14/80 meeting on the limitation of municipal bond interest rates, the Council should make this contingent upon this factor. 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - 4/14/80 Additionally, the Council may want to revise and limit the scope of the project to just the townhouse development in Macarlund Plaza. If Mr. Hoglund is interested in serving his parcel to the north of his home, this could be added at a later date once the City receives a plat of this area. REFERENCES: Agenda supplement on Item d3 for the March 24, 1980 meeting, along with copy of feasibility report that was sent out previously. - 2 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - 4/14/80 I ( j, Consideration of Approval of Non-Intoxicatinq Malt Liquor On -Sale License - Monticello Slow Pitch League. PURPOSE: Consideration of a 3.2 license for the Monticello Slow Pitch League. In the past, the City of Monticello has issued a 3.2 beer license to the softball league for on -sale. License fee is $62.50 and runs from approxi- mately May 1st until October 15th. That I am aware of, there hasn't been any particular problems with the sale of 3.2 beer by the league. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of issuance of non-intoxicatiPg malt liquor on -sale license to the Monticello Slow Pitch League r 13i t/ • �C• Quarterly Meeting of Department Heads. The following Department Heads will be in attendance at Monday night's meeting for the quarterly meeting: representative of Wright County Sheriff's Department aren Hanson - Senior Citizens Director aul Klein - Fire Chief Cren Klein - Building Inspector 8 Civil Defense Director to -lin Simola - Public Works Director ,/ Gary Wieber - City Administrator��,•v,U''tw"l/� v Mr. Mike Melstad, with the YMCA detached worker program will also be in attendance at the quarterly meeting. One item of concern previously addressed by the Council and apparently a problem this year, is the amount spent for schools and training by the fire department in comparison with their budget. Following are figures for the years 1977 through 1980, comparing the budget amount with the expenditures: YEAR BUDGET EXPENDITURES apo 1977 $ 600 E 332? 1978 400 667 �y� xtkA �a SPA 1979 900 2,430 1980 1,400 625• *Spent 1n 1980 thus far, not including estimated $954 for six men at fire school in Duluth in April. C it should be noted that the firemen are paid a per diem of $30.00 per day in addition to expenses incurred for attending training or schooling• - 3 - l CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - 4/14/80 4. Consideration of Approval of Assiqnment of Securities for Deposits. PURPOSE: Acceptance of securities pledged by two of the City's official depositories; Wright County State Bank and First National Bank of Minneapolis. (It should be noted that the third official depository of the City is Security Federal; however, the City's funds are adequately secured by the FSLiC insurance coverage of $100,000 since the City's investment at Security Federal does not exceed this amount.) Enclosed, you will find agreements with the First National Bank of Minnea- polis and Wright County State Bank whereby these two depositories assign various securities in pledge of collateral for the investments the City has in either checking account, daily savings account, or certificates of deposit. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approval of security agreements and the securities therein specified and assignment thereof. REFERENCES: Copies of the security agreements with Wright County State Bank and First National Bank of Minneapolis. 5. Consideration of Final Payment to Arcon Construction. PURPOSE: Consideration of final payment to Arcon Construction on the 1977-3 permanent street improvement project. ,'On September 10, 1979, the City Council reviewed a request for additional items submitted by Arcon Construction and approved a portion of the extra items that were being requested by Arcon Construction, amounting to $7,930.73. With the approval of this additional amount, the total con- tract amounted to $2,668,551.66, and it was decided at the same meeting that the Council should withhold $13,000 until an agreement could be formed between the City of Monticello and the contractor on the additional items that were being requested by Arcon Construction, which primarily n were the amounts mentioned in a February 27, 1980 letter from Arcon Construction, copy of which is enclosed, which would amount to $9,954 for payment of additional wearing course installed, and $5,251 for the replacement and repair of curb and sidewalk. Additionally, nc ynu can see in their February 27, 1980 letter, they are asking for approximately another $6,693 for differences that their records show for quantities actually ` installed by Arcon Construction Company and those reflected by our engineer. On April 8, 1980, our engineer, John Badalich, John Simola, our public works director, and I met with representatives of Arcon Construction to attempt to reach an agreement that could be submitted to the City Council for ratification. Initially, Arcon Construction was willing to take the above bills which totalled $21,898 and settle for half the amount, or $10,949. Our initial offer to them was to accept their request for the additional monies relative to the payment of the wearing course and replacement and repair of curb and sidewalk for $9,954 and $5,251, respectively, and ignore the request for additional monies based on quantity differences, and from this total amount, deduct the costs incurred by the City for expenses as - 4 . CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - 4/14/80 a result of thefrozen watermain, plus repair on Broadway and Cedar Street, amounting to $7,311. As a result then, the City would recognize their re- quest for additional items amounting to $15,205, but credit against this J $7,311 for costs incurred by the City, for a net amount of $7,894. At this point, an agreement was reached to basically compromise on Arcon's request of $10,949 and the City's proposed position of $7,894, and suggest settlement in the amount of $9,475, in addition to the amount we still owe of $13,000. John Badalich, John Simola and I would recommend that the City Council approve the request for additional items of $9,475 based on the following: A. Litigation on this item could easily run to $2,500, with an equivalent amount being spent in staff time on the part of the City if it was necessary to go to court to resolve the matter. Contractor has a basis for a legitimate argument to some extent in the case of the additional wearing course, plus there is no question that the material was provided. The question was more one of whether it was required, and who directed it to be put in. Considering the fact that the overall project was in excess of $2.6 Million Dollars, there have been very little problems. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approval of final settlement to Arcon Construction in the amount of $22,475 (consisting of $13.000„Atill owed plus additional $9,475 for additional items). REFERENCES: February 27, 1980 letter from Arcon Construction Company to our engineer. 6. Consideration of Settinq Up Special Meetinq on Workshop Session with the Planninn Commission on Monticello's Siqn Ordinance. PURPOSE: Consideration of a workshop session to review Monticello's current sign ordinance, specifically the aspects of the amortization of non -conforming signs. The Planning Commission has held the public informational meeting requested by the City Council on April 8, 1980. In light of the input received from concerned property owners and sign representatives, along with the possi- bility that the City of Monticello may hdve to cumpensate the sign coTpanies for signs removed if the City is even successful in its ordinance, the Planning Commission would like to have a workshop session with the City Council on the entire matter. Reason for the terminology of "workshop session” would be for the Planning Commission to get input from the City Council relative to how far they want to go with the particular sign ordinance. Various suggestions, alterations, revisions, etc., have been suggested, and the Planning Commission wishes to touch base on this very important issue before it decides to hold any further public hearings which might revise the City's current ordinance. This - 5 - C, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - 4/14/80 workshop session would be obviously an open meeting, but it is the Planning Commission's intention to get the input from the City Council itself now that it has got the public input. It is intended that the City Attorney and our City Planner will also be present. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of setting up special meeting with the Planning Commission on workshop session for review of Monticello's sign ordinances. 6- C COUNCIL UPDATE - APRIL 14, 1980 1. Raisinq Statutory Interest Ceilinq for Municipal Bonds. Currently, there is an attempt within the Legislature to raise the statutory interest rate for municipal honds from its present 7% limitation to 12%. As you are probably aware, because of current market conditions, there is no way a municipality can sell a bond at 7%, and the 12% would allow munici- palities such as Monticello to issue municipal improvement bonds in 1980. Currently, this provision has been made a part of the omnibus tax bill, and as a result, has been caught in the middle between a difference of opinion between the house and the senate on several aspects of the omnibus tax bill. There appears a possibility, if the differences cannot be worked out, that the specific issue of the municipal bond interest rate will be put into a separate bill and not be made part of the omnibus tax bill. 2. Seminar on Nuclear Power: Impact on Local and Reqional Governments. At the last meeting, a handout was given relative to the above seminar that is to be held June 5, 6 & 7, 1980 in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Since this seminar deals with the role of local government in nuclear power and since the City of Monticello has the NSP nuclear power plant, Arve Grimsmo and i are tentatively scheduled to attend this seminar. 3. Drainaqe Problem - Balboul Estates. Our Engineer, Public Works Director, Building Inspector, along with Marvin George, are currently reviewing the drainage situation at Balboul Estates. It appears that the two drainage ponds within Balboul Estates are fairly close to grade, however, the fact remains that the builder, Marvin George, did construct a walk -out basement, which was inconsistent with the minimum first floor elevation as presented in the drainage' plan for Balboul Estates. Additionally, there is a concern with the first home on the west side of the street in Anders -Wilhelm Estates, since it also has a walkout basement and could be subject to possible flooding. The possibility of burming these two lots will be explored, along with other alternatives after review of the entire matter with the parties involved. GW/ns 4. Ellison Park. On Thursday, March 27, 1980, the Public Works Director met with representatives of the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the State Aid Engineer from Brainerd, and a representative of the Wright County Parks Department about the Ellison Park upgrading. At this meeting, the combination project develop- ment report and location/design study report, as prepared by the Public Works Director, was submitted for review (a copy of which is available if desired). This review should be completed in a few weeks and the final report can be prepared. At this time, we will have to select an engineer to complete the necessary plans, specifications and estimates using our and Mn Dots Design Peramitars and rough drawings. John Badalich has given a rough estimate of $1,000 for such services. While a pre -design meeting will determine the actual development, we are now planning for a boat launch with parking, blacktopping the existing drives and parking areas (excluding the easterly drive), upgrading and replacing park furnishings and remodeling of the restroom facilities. Total cost is estimated at $40,000, of which the City's share will be $4,800. The construction is slated for fall 1980 with completion in Spring 1981. It is possible that the City will have to provide construction inspection services by an engineering firm. If this is so, this inspection could be run concurrently with another project such as the disposal plant, making its cost minimal. 5. Sludge Program. On Friday, March 28, 1980, the Public Works Director met with three farmers owning land east and southeast of Monticello. These farms are within a 5 -mile radius of the disposal plant and have heavy soils. The meeting consisted of a tour of the Litchfield Disposal Plant and its sludge appli- cation program. The farmers were able to see the actual application of sludge with modern equipment and talk with landowners now using sludge. This meeting was very productive and we now have these three farms set for pilot programs this summer. These farms, however, are located on heavy soil and could, at times, be inaccessible. We still require some nearby farmland with sandy soil. i have approached the MPCA in regards to purchase, and they have stated that we should apply through our construction engineer. It is possible that we may be able to meet the criteria for funding, gut it could be a costly, time consuming application. C With spring at hand, it is time to consider some of the equipment purchases budgeted for 1980. STREET DEPARTMENT - As previously stated in the capital outlay report, the purchase of compaction equipment is necessary for various street repairs and City projects. Our Early '60's model 1 -ton static roller is too light for many blacktop patching jobs and since it does not vibrate, it does little to compact soils. in addition, because of its age, many breakdowns occur resulting in lost time and poor quality compaction. We have determined that a newer 2 -ton vibratory roller with hydrostatic drive would be more practical. Also, a small piece of equipment such as a tamper is needed to compact potholes, small patches, pathways, excavation corners, etc. We have received three quotes for a used 2 -ton roller and a new Homelite tamper, all of which will accept our old 1 -ton roller in trade. To stay within our budget guideline of $3,700, we would have to accept the low quote from R.M.S. for the 1976 model Dynapac and Homelite tamper in the amount of $3,635. it should be noted, however, that we could obtain a like -new 2 -ton Model from R.M.S. for an addi- tional $900. The Public Works Director and Street Superintendent operated all units and found the 1978 unit needing no repairs whatsoever. PARK AND TREE DEPARTMENT - Originally, we were to purchase a weed and ferti- lizer sprayer• mounted in a Cushman truckster. However, we found extremely high increases in prices for this type of equipment this spring. We had budgeted $5,650 for both pieces of equipment, and this year, that would only buy the Cushman. Due to the increased costs over those estimated, we have changed our thinking and now believe it would be better to purchase a self-contained trailer - mounted sprayer to be pulled behind our existing equipment such as the Bolens. CUB or JO. This sprayer would be used primarily for spraying fertilizer and weed killer in the parks (2/3) and for the spraying of Durasban in the. DED sanitation program (1/3). The sprayer is also versatile enough to wash buildings, signs or field equipment if needed. We have received three quotes ranging from S2,575 to $4,075. 1 recommend that we accept the low quote of $2,575 from Minnesota Wanner Co. of Minneapolis. JOHN E. SIMOLA PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR APRiL 10, 1980 C N C' 7'hut ail said deposits, the disposal thereof, and tha security therefor, shall at all times be subject to the provisions of (.he statutes of .Vinnesota relating thereto and to depositories of public funds. I•N' 4117'.YF..5.0 11"REREOF, It has caused thin proposal to he executed in its corporate name by its Bond Invest_ OffL49R ,pond Invest. OCHcer andits corpora tosea Itobehereuntoaffixedby authority of its board of directors this................................day of ..... .,._..................... .... ....................... ........ ...... 19............ FIRST NATIONAL MNK OF MINNEAPOLIS MINNEAPOLIS ,,-,MLNNESOTA.................. ......... liyc..��so.;'_`<s... �7.:_��-r:�_x.-in__~v."c.......................... IY PRESENCE OF I r its . Bond Investment officer r r. ......... ._........... and . i..i},.a .__�... /.V...'�.'a.(1L�:'f_-.�_.... ..... '\.•(�i}�..Ci_��!.i� 6tate of 01imiegottt, iss. (,'auntynf. .....Henne.pin... ... .... ... ........ ....... On tlr,ia .. - - -. ............day of ...,. ..._ ........... ,................- 19......... .. before me apps red Delores D. h'alstrom rr ,rel Edward Whelan ., each to mc, personally known, who, being by medrrlysworn, dut sa•y that thtyare respectively the.pond lnvest,.Off _.... nf. ................._..................................................................P..IIe nnJ .Bond Investment Officer First National Bank of Minneapolis .. .. ._. .... ... ... n corporation;... .... .. ................................................ ......... ........ -............. tL,d thr. .+cal nlli.rrd to the within instrument is the corpormte sral of said corporation, that said inatru- n,rrrt ams signed and .sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its board of directors; and snid Delores.. l.'alstrom Edward Whelan ...acknowledgedsaidinstrument 11.1 ............................and ...... '......... .... ............... ....... ..............,....... fn l.r Nrr free art and Jcnl of+ssirt,eoao.i f. nn� r\�(`e.-,` `�,.. L....t.':. �_' '. KAREN U. 3"Vimf rtssr JUTpltrt�NEaPC'sCOu�nri95OIA eD .1'n(ury Publio,........ flrnnePlq.County,,lli� �.. n n. V IrIMM" r.a•��r.ns�r�rrrrsTrvyw �, •i, ,I/y rom.miasion e.rpiree ',•.,...-:.. 1 a� I �O 7. + I 1 I j 000 a 7 �I O m L 0 '.1 P.W'F..&. 1—tt1 10631 blill—D"i, C... Mi.... P.C. TO City of Monticello I . .......... ... I .. . ..... . ....... .. . . I....... IllYYESOT.-1; I ... W to you" adve'lisri"Cnt for bids therefor, flee undersigned hereby submits the fvllwvirj¢ pro- lrmu l: That it will ,el us a delAsitory of the public funds of file City of Monticello .. . .. ..... .......................... I .......... ...' .... ........ .... . I .............. ....... .... _... ..._._ .. - .Jlinn'soto. for the Iran of years from the date of approval of its bond or other security according to into. That it wilt i-eceire deposits of any or all of said lieyidA and hold the same al all 1111te,,, subject to mly- areal thereof an demand, uRiMM.KXYJMKU7Z`�xwr�ya"xxaxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%AUXAW.Xrfmd",Uyjyx That it trill receive deltosits of any or all of said j, ds f-- —riain and sio-ifird pvriod- of XMIN" XXXXXXXXXXXXKXXK)4vtux=.KKXXXXXXXMXMV"Mxxxx.xXXXXXXNKUUXXXXXXXXXXX,uxxxxxxvxw and hold Ih, sa-e n,hject id Pap'nente; at lite expiration of said periods, and will aline.., . ..... lit and pap when due on Negotiable Certificates of Deposit at a rate as negotiated from ;nfr,r.f tilMXXX,)LXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYMX)iYaXXXILYWILIAMY�M time to time and fora stated period. it will furnish a true aped roe-rcet slateinvid of "X>J[ hued. for the prvredi3O 7'1,(,t as sew,rit ' i' for said deposits, it proposes to furnish, and,. assign such securities as are authorized by law. (St't. mea or wfrom.m or .—h" -d d--- f.11, i, ) ...... :,vilh -I"niff"d ". a lw rl h I ' do. 1002—A�fgzmeot m S. ! tk. to Iho of Bose Er Moe t kWtona I-- N,', patrnl4vi. Pu. � �". Nitow All ffien by 04eee 11rPornts. That_ WRIM" COMM STamC_, BA ,. Mbntigollo,...Minnesota inconsideration of its designation as a depository of public funds as hereinafter specified, hereby asaigas, traaalers, and sets over to said City gf11ogtir�—_.—._, those certain securities described as follows, to -wit: U. S. Treas. Note, $50,000, maturity 6/30/80, Rate 8,25% n n 5U,000, 8/15/81, Rate 8.375% Federal Farm Credit Bank, $200,000 , maturity 9/l/82, Rate 9.650% 11 11300,000, /4/80, Rate 14.35% Federal Intermed. Credit Banks, $250,000, maturity 'Q/1/80, Rate 7.30$ Grand Rapids GO Imp. Bond, '$30,0OO, maturity 8/1/83, Rate 6% Hastings MN Gen. Imp. Bd., $25,000 , maturity 1/1/83, Rate 5.25% Minn. Hog. Fin. Agency Hm Ian., $25,000, maturity 2/1/84, Rate 6.35% Moundsview ISD #621, $25,000, mattarity 8/1/83, Rate 5% Willmar MIDI Ref Rev. Bd. of 1974, $30,000, maturity 1/1/83, Date 6.10% Mthe total market value ol_. t�in� lfditirod hig_ Fiv_u Tlwuutuui tuid uv�0 tf,gether with such other securities as may hereafter be by it delivered to Fan ig UQ_ in lieu of all or any part thereof and additional thereto pursuant to the statutes of the State of Winaesots relating to depositories of public funds; 4t Qlanilthrralion alta Gonbuton of Ults Asstgtmtent axil DrpooU of 6rturiliza tut #mh: That whereas it has submitted in writing to the_ 4ot??1&f.—.._._......_......................_...,of said said proposal to be designated a depository of said funds of said.._.._.. ................. City_of_MQnticcllo,,,,,__._„_ . forthe term oi.._ __....._.__.__.._ _.._.._._~_year from the—.._......_._.._.- .............................. ........ day of—_ 19._., upon the terms of said proposal which is hereby made 1st Natl. Bank, Mpla. & 1•lidland Natl., Mpls a part hereof, and has assigned said securities and agreed to deposit the same with/the Treasurer of said co=30%k together with such other securities as may during said term be substituted therefor or any part thereof and additional thereto as security for the payment of ...... ....... ................ ._.....,...._.....__.._.__..............„_.._ _..... ._..._..__ —.-,._.. JBt3Ib of said public funds so to be deposited. Now, $Ilrreforr, If, in case it shall be designated such depository of said funds, it shall observe all its duties as such depository according to the statutes of the State of Minnesota relating to depositories of such public funds, which statutes are hereby made a pan hereof, shall credit, account for, and pay over to said ............ C1t , of, Monticello ......- without exchange or other charges, on demand and its legal orders, all funds and moneys which shall be de- posited with it subject to such demands and orders, with interest thereon according to its said proposal, and all funds and moneys which shall be deposited with it as time deposits, and interest thereon, as the same shall become due, and at the end of said term shall credit, account for, and pay over, the same to the _—_Trr,mumeer—__•_ of Said T` City of Monticello —_--� _� _, all of which It hereby promises and agrees to do, this assignment and obligation shall become void and said securities shall be surrendered and delivered to it by said City. of Monticello _�, otherwise it ,ball be and remain of full force and effect; and in case of any default on its part under the stat- utes of the State of Minnesota relating to depositories of public funds, it hereby authorizes and empowers said — __SlSY3.i M1�t cello _--- _ _—and its governing body and officers, to sell and dispose of all said securities, or such part thereof as shall be necessary, out of the proceeds thereof to retain and keep the full amounts due to said._„gity of Mantieo11-0,__— and to pay the overplus, it any, to it as such depository, or its assigns. In Witrtruo Mllerrof, It baa caused these presents to be executed in its corporate name by its._..„pl.itd#SE_ �__ and _ Cnehior _ —,_,_—,_•_and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed by authority of ita board of directors this _._ ._?�� __. .._..._....._....day of ........... _Varch„„... _ _ 19. 80 . In Presence of r Wright County State Bank MN........ _.... ......................... c� �...-�, � .� . •/.,�-tet'.. / j� _ \ 74r o J. LtutgWit-L - _,. / Y tea '� .s^.=�.>:.'a.r.� ......_....._...»._ a 5 00 C Otatt of ffinnrants. county of--Wri hh On this._..-_._- -ZD� �—day at- _._._.._ _.._.M_areh_ 19.�_., appeared before me—. Pale J. ZamMritz __.ana to me personalty (mown, who, being by me duty sworn, did say that they are respectively the Preoidant- and_ Cpghier�,_—„_,,,,-of_HRIGHT COMY STATE BAW _- _ a corporation; that the seat affixed to the within instrument is the corporate seat of said corporation, that said instrument was signed and scaled in behalf of said corporation by authority of its board of directors; and said Dalo J _u-i;witz —and-----»- �.._al Stoke- _...._,_acknowledged ---- ,.�.-. said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. i �� •1�`T.,n.,�.aJ'ret9tl i Notary Public, .�.._-. ._-..».._._,..___ --•---FfrisitL_-_._._County. Minn. My commission expires.._.._.....,_._228.,____...__. t� APPROVAL OF SECURTTIFS As recording officer of the governing body of the. --...Sid. of-_ _ Monti ee110 -�-� I hereby certify that on th- day uf.»___..__ —_ �- " 19___.., a resolution was duly adopted by the said governing body approving the within agreement, the securities therein specified, and the assignment thereof. Datedthis.._._,_..-- -•---._._..._-.-day oL_._._...._. _.. _..-----..__-.._.._......_.._...., -- (Title) DESIGNATION OF OF DEPOSITORY Pursuant and subject to the terms of the foregoing instrument and its proposal therefor made a part thereof -._-._..._.....___._..__»_ ....r _........_ ......................_._._is hereby designated depository i of the public funds of the .............. CitY._..__._.._........... _..... _........... ....._...._..._.._.._.___...._....-.._._-._....._ of ............. _............. _.._...... „...... ....... _, Minnesota. for the term of I ......................................... .......-years from the. -._._,_....._.._....day of...._...._._._..._.._._...__� , 19„.__ . By i That all said deposits, the disposal tl+er•to/, and lite security therefor, shad at all tincts be subject to � the pr•acisions of lite statutes of .Alinnesotarelating thrreto and to depositories of public funds. 1.1' WITNESS WHEREOF, It has caused this proposal to be executed in its corporate name by its Bond Invest. OfficgAd Bond Invest. Officer and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed by nuthor•ity of its board of directors this.. . . ........ day of.. ._ ............... ............................ ............., Itl..._... FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS (SEAL) MI NNEAPOLLY+IS , . MINNESOTA ............�._�. ............................. By ................ IN PRESENCE OF !,Bond Investment O 2� ...... ............ffic...... cr r,l and f ft-- C On �,^l Bond Investment Officer IL L-�tl.,_...... Ile ................. ..........._.........._.....,.... Illi 4 btate of fflinne5ota, j �sa. I County of Iiennerin .................... On this .. day of 19 . .., before rite I appear.+! Delores D. Walstrom and Edward Whelnn each to r+ra personally known, who. brie jt by me duty en•orn, dirt say drat they are respectively theWd invest_.Of f . and Bond Investment,.,0,fficer nf. .., First•.Nntioasl Sank of Minncapoils .. a corporation: -. ... ..._.. ........_..._....__.... ................_. ... th,it the scat alr.red to the within Instrument is the corporate seat of said corporation, that said instru- u+ent was signed and stated in behalf of said corporation by authority of its board of directors; and said Delores D. Walstrom and Edward Whelan acknowledged said instmotent / \ ! to he the jeer net umt drrr7 aJ aatd corporation. r . r AAs.AA.MASYAre"IW�AA�AYaAAs�su .... .......z.t .:.a.`...:/. ................ ........_.._....... KANEN D. JAHVEY �,.'rtr+DiA+trr+ucuC•&VNNESOrA y ticnnepin \ Couniy,d/inn. 11V:r4CPTI cou14TY Votnr Public . ............................................ air O+mR.kaAe (41,3 Apt. 0. 1930 .tly commission etpirta p j i I t < %� s 96m r i d � ° t +» c � i a 1 v c - Nu. 1012—P-1 f f P.1,111 F.,d,. ilt,,hd 19811 I TO City of Monoticel,lco.—, MINNESOT.I: Pit rxua at t,j your tooli-ri -I ixe, to ient for bids f It rp-clor, 16e undc,Pigae,I h-ehy Pool,.., it. the fullrurinRI That it will ,cl as a ticlonritory of the public funds of the C' ty -qf Mont ice 1.15l-- ........................................................ ...... Minnesota, far the tern of years from the date of approi,al of its bond or other security according to lata. That it trill receitc deposits ofanyor all of said fandoi and hold the same at till. times subject to lwly- thereof ort demand, io=)kXhUL%UYAOCWY"NXXXNX)=XXXXXKXXXXXXXW- XYJ(KXIMKXyixxXXXM That it trill receive de/waits of any or fill of suiel I'atuts jor certain and sliecilied perimls of lip—XW $Wumn XXX TCC XXXX)LXXX.Unp=XXXX)D=XXXXXxXxDMAUXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXKWXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXKWAILK and hold the &-ic abject to payments at the expiration of said periods, and will allow, rredit and parrwl from when due on Negotiable Certificates of Deposit at a rate as negotiated ;atrrr,1 T"IiKX)LXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXIIW)LvMW'Y'YAEMK- time to time and for a stated period. That it mill furnish a true and correct slates ... m I of y,xXlX x4cxxxKKx�CKMXKXXKIIXNINnXKXKXYAUD(N)CtXY.*XXXXKXX the I Moores a,, / ...... 1. for the pr-edinL, ..,cart/ ..Out/That Thatas security for said deposits, it proposes to furnish ._and assign such securities as are authorized by low. 19.1. mod or f —lli- —d d—lo- lull,, whir!, i. herewith ". a l".1 I' - Mo. 1 S.2ZAWtm¢tet W !t—1, P.?Lk neeo0— -1171 Nunut All ffiru lnl d71 lirse PrrnrntB, M1nnAapgjis, Minneaoolts.ddiaquota in consideration of its designation as a depository of public funds o[_ C.pf Mgp icel�g._____.___ �. as hereinafter specified, hereby assigns, transfers, and sets over to said Cit1r of Monticello A those certain secuitieu described as follows, to -wit: Rice County Minnesota Hospital District Bonds 5% 15 @ $5,000.00 Maturity 2/1/89 $75,000.00 Kent County Minnesota Sewage Disposal System Bonds 3.60 10 @ $5,000.00 Maturity 4/1/86 $50,000.00 Total $125,000.00 -f the total market value ol_. _.__Ono hunQSQQ„�yrn6Y_� LYC_L114uBII04 _________..Dollen, :ngether with such other securities as may hereafter be by it delivered to City of Monticollo_r in lieu of sll or any part thereof and additional thereto pursuant to the statutes of the State of Minnesota relating to depositories of public lands; -y- ----- (Phe (LonaWration anh OnndUion of this Anstgnment aub deposit of Orturtileo are Ouch; That whereas it has submitted in writing to the _.....�it�Council __..of said „-City of Monticello its said proposal to be designated a depository of said fonds of said._.._..._.__.. �ity of Monrticello for the term --------- from the._..___Lkr@3._.... ....... _................................... day of,.----Janu> X _ i9$p� u n the tc s of said proposal which is hereby. made Effe edernl tteaerve Bank of Minneapolis for .t part hereof, and has assigned said securities and agreed to deposit the same with/the Treasurer of said XXXXXXXXXXXXWXXKXXXXXXX}0,X} u t imp XXKl91[6= together with such other securities as may during said term be substituted therefor or any part thereof and additional thereto as stcurity for the payment of..............__..........._..__......._.._............_................_.._ _....... __.._—._.jap)upg of said public funds so to be deposited. Now, Milereforr, If, in case it shall be designated such depository of said funds, it shall observe all its duties as such depository according to the statutes of the State of Isfinnesota relating to depositories of curb public funds, which statutes are hereby made a part hereof, shall credit, account for, and pay over to ...........Xhe_.TrCasurrt...__—_ said ............... �Lx..R�_Mtzttlltnllo......................._.,...._.._ without exchange or other charges, on demand and its legal orders, all funds and moneys which shall be de• posited with it subject to such demands and orders, lft}4tiflflflfhtttlfl6iii8t?fyJ{�[8�{XIt7�>�17t�[�Lii]�t .,.tiannyv,u80t76Q7t�SC,l1Bi�4t i%XKUX&4VQ" and at the end of said term shall credit, account for, and pay over, the same to the Treasurer of saidCf t of Monticello all of which it _._Treas_y hereby promises and agrees to do, this assignment and obligation shall become void and said securities shall be surrendered and delivered to it by said „_�Cityof Monticello_--�—_,,-- otherwise it shall be and remain of full force and effect; and in case of any default on its part under the stat. utes of the State of Nfinnesota relating to depositories of public funds, it hereby authorizes and empowers said C oC Monticello --� and its governing body and officers, to sell and dispose of all said securities, or such part thereof as shall be necessary, out of the proceeds thereof to retain and keep the full amounts due to said..,,._,Cit .1� Monticello„_ and to pay the orerplus. if any, to it as such depository, or its assigns. In Witnraa Wilrrraf, It has caused these presents to be executed in its corporate name by its. Bond I�tv atm Officer — _ani. Bond lnvostm= Officer and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed by authority of its board of directors this_ ._—.__ of ............ —, 19.00 . In Presence of FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NINYPAPOLIS _�tlt+atr�s....r�i:it�morn....... _.................................. i..i:— 1r” ka Bond invest. Officer and..L�.L:..�.,1_:...,r._..._.1.:L...».......''l....__._ les—._. 62n__..._d Inv.....est._., oCClear _...»_...._. I 4 Otate of fiintlesaia. County o/ Hennepin On tbis._.__--10th ---day appeared before me—Delores D. Walstrom-Edward Whelan — — _and ------•---------•----•-- tome personally known, *ho, being by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the Bond Invest_ Off ii cer and- _@O.tul Invest. Office Af-- First National pnk of Minneapolis_._••_ a corporation; that the seal affixed to the within instrument is the corporate seal of &aid corporation, that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its board of directors; and said Delores D. Walstrom -•_and— Eduard Whelan _-- _--acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. IV1kEN 0. JAHYCY / acLr•• rrOrArrr PustJ�. N;t,rJE. Notary Public, .= Nan—_ ---County. Minn. /! HEIJr;EPIN bOiA MI'Wn�liflon COU�Jir [//��/�� ttly commission exgres..__-.._.-.-,.-.�..._.._._.......-- r es r4r, 9, 19r0 APPROVAL OF SECURMIES As recording officer of the governing body of Monticello , I hereby certify that on tF- day of--___-� --, 19_ a resolution was duly adopted by the said governing body approving the within agreement, the securities therein specified, and the assignment thereof. Dated this.._ _-__ day otl9._80 I -^--City Adminiatrator -_ (Title) DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITORY Pursuant and subject to the terms of the foregoing instrument and its proposal therefor made a part thereof -_ tha Firet National Bank of Minncapolle -.-.is hereby designated depository ofthe public funds of the..............UkY.._...._.__.-.._.-.... ._.................. _...................... _.._._................... .......... of Monticallo ........ Minnesota, for the term of ono .. yearyfromthe tat _�. day ot.._� January_ _.._._.._ r _._, 19.11.. City of wonticollo By .......... ................ ... -.--__._.-_..._.._.._......_._..- _.._........._.._ City Adminiacrator y ARCON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. G E N E R A L C O N T R A C T O R S PHONE 612/679.2244 MORA. MINNESOTA 66061 February 27, 1980 21-78 Mr.John P. Badalich, P.E. Orr -Schelen-Mayerson & Assoc., Inc. 2021 E. Hennepin Ave. Suite238 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 RE: Monticello, Minnesota Improvement No. 77-3 Your letter dated November 8, 1979 Dear John: As you well know, we have never agreed on items 1 and 10 onthe list of disputed items. I would like to review these so that everyone is aware of our view re- garding payment of these items. 01 Item No. 1 - P;lvment of wearina course mixture. % % S y Our records and your records indicate that a total of 1,375.85 tons of bituminous was used for this work. Special Provisions, Article 42 is very specific in stating that basis of payment will be at the contract unit price per ton for wearing course mixture for driveways. It is also stated in this provision that the driveway mat will be 2 inches thick, when this work wan installed, the inspector on the project instructed our people to install the drives at 6 inches and more in thickness. we did not question this, as the pay itr_m was by the ton in place, and we were never told that this would not be the case. It now appears that we should have refused to place these drives as requested by your field personnel. 31.ems 2 throuah 8 - Differences that our records indicate 104,� exist between what was pctually installed by Arcon Construc- 93 tion Co. and what you show on the estimates. With a project of this size, it would be very unlikely if there weren't some differences in quantities at comp- letion. We were willing to.overlook some of these when we felt that we would be able to final the project without a big hasael. Now, however, it has become apparent that the AnF.pualOpportunr mptoyer 5 ARCON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. MOnA. MINNESOTA 66081 Page 2 JohnP. Hadalich February 27, 1980 intent of the city is to withhold payment for work that we did not feel was in question. We therefore feel we must now insist that we receive payment for all work performed. y Item 10 - Renlacement and repair of curb and sidewalk. .S,ZS/ Most of this was because of cracking during the winter of 1978 and 1979. To the best of my knowledge all of this work was installed in strict conformance with the plans and specifications. If these failures were due to workmanship or material, there would be no question as to the responsibility for repair. This not being the case, I believe the city must assume the responsibility for design, poor subsoil material or whatever the cause of these failures might be. Also, included in Item 10 is the replacement of a drive- way that was broken when a house was moved over it (with the permission of the city) and a radius that was replaced because of a grade problem. When we drove the project last spring and were instructed to do this work, we were told to keep records on our costs and a change order would be written to handle payment. Now that the work is comp- leted, you say the city has no responsibility. This is hard to believe. When we held the last meeting in Monticello, an offer was made by the city for some sort of compromise. This had to do with liquidated damages and we don't feel that any liquidated damages are due. Therefore, this is completely unacceptable to us. If, We still have not come to any agreement on the frozen 6011 watermain problems stated in Gary Wieber's letters of ` BQy.&.w February 20, 1979 and April 20, 1979. My position has not .4,4_ changed and we feel we are not responsible for these problems.p�„� It you icethere is some possibility that we can come 'BT" sap to an agreement on any of these items I will be glad to meet with you at your convenience. If not, we will be forced to go to litigation. sincerely, ARCON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Herman Tows ,ace Gary Wicber Executive Vice President lml S MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTiCELLO CITY COUNCIL March 24, 1980 - 7:30 P. M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Arve Grimsmo, Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Phil White. Members Absent: None 1. Public Hearing on the Consideration of a Variance Request for a Beauty Shop in an R-1 Zone at 1305 West Broadway - Barb Soucy. Barb Soucy requested a variance to allow her to operate a beauty shop in her home at 1305 West Broadway (Lot 9, Block 1, Doerr Estates). City Ordinances do allow for home occupations under certain circumstances, but a variance would be needed in this instance since a beauty shop is not one of the home occupations allowed under current ordinances. According to Ms. Soucy, she would have no employees and no more than one appointment at any time unless there might be an overlap of'one person leaving and a new appointment arriving. Arlene McIntyre spoke in favor of allowing Barb Soucy to have a beauty shop, indicating that other operators have been granted permission to operate out of their home in the past, and felt that 11s. Soucy would provide a service that is much needed in Monticello. Councilman Maus questionned why certain home occupations are alloyed under City Ordinances, while others are not, and felt that maybe this entire definition should he reviewed in the future. fir. Maus also indicated that he was not convinced that everyone needed to be in the downtown business area to provide a service or conduct business within Monticello. Councilman Blonigen felt that the ordinance should also be reviewed and indicated that in his opinion beauty shops and other small businesses should be allowed to start in a persons residence because. If not allowed there, these services may not be provided at all within a City. Councilmen Fair and White expressed concern over where does the city draw the line as to the number of beauty shops that would be allowed if the variances are continued to be approved. It was felt by these two councilmen that if variances are continued, the Ordinance might as well be changed to allow all people to open beauty shops if they request. Planning Commission recommendations were to deny this variance request based on the fact there are areas properly zoned for such use in the downtown area and felt this would he an unfair advantage to those businesses and beauty shops that were Operating out of the home as Opposed to those that were in a business location paying real estate taxes, etc. The Planning Commission has noted they will be reviewing the entire definition of allowable home occupations in a residential zone in the future to deter- mine whether the ordinance should he changed to allow more uses or• restrict uses at all in a residential area. COUNCIL MiNUTES - 3/24/80 Motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Ken Maus and unanimously carried to grant Barb Soucy a variance to allow her to operate a beauty salon in her home at 1305 West Broadway, provided there is only one operator with only one customer at a time with one off-street parking. Motion was also made by Fran Fair, seconded by Ken Maus and unanimously carried to have a City-wide moratorium on all future variance requests for beauty shop operations and all other home occupations until the Planning Commission has had time to review the ordinance in detail and submit their recommendations on possible changes. 2. Public Hearing on the Consideration of a Variance Request on Rear Yard Setback and Minimum Lot Width and Subdivision of Lots - Lee Hatfield. Mr. Gary DeBoer, on behalf of Mr. Lee Hatfield, requested the Council approve a simple subdivision of lot's 4 & S, Rlock 39, Tc:rr;ite of Monticello. into two lots. Currently, there is a home located on the southerly part of Lots 4 & 5, and the proposal was to divide off the northerly part of Lots 4 & 5 into a separate buildable lot. The proposed newly created lot would be 10,032 square feet, and the remaining existing home would have 11,728 square feet. Both of these lots would exceed the 10,000 square foot minimum requirement necessary in an R-2 zone. Variances were requested in that City ordinances require a 30' rear yard setback, whereas, only 27' would be provided on the existing house and also. City ordinances require a minimum of 80' street frontage lot width, while the proposed lot would provide only 76'. The Planning Commission, at their last meeting, recommended unanimously to approve this subdivision since hoth lots did meet the minimum square footage requirement, and the variances needed were very close to the actual requirements of the City ordinances. Motion was made by Fran fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen and unanimously carried to approve the simple subdivision of Lots 4 & 5, Block 39, Townsite of Monticello, for Lee Hatfield, contingent upon a certificate of survey being presented and the recording of the subdivision with the County Recorder. The motion included approving the variances of 3' for tile rear yard setback for the existing house, and allowing the lot to be 4' less than the minimum lot width requirement. 3. Public ilearinq on the 1980-1 improvement Project feasibility Rehor�t for Sewer, Water and Other Improvements Mnq Fast County Road 39 and East County Road 75. At the March 24, 1980 Council Meeting, a public hearing was scheduled to review the feasibility report on the 1980-1 improvement project consisting of sewer and water and other improvements along East County Road 39, East County Road 75 and Macarlund Plaza Development. - 2 - COUNCIL MiNUIES - 3/24/80 John Badalich, City Engineer, reviewed with the Council the feasibility 7 report as prepared, which proposed the following assessments to the following property owners: Macarlund Plaza Townhouse Area S 93,277 Remaining portion of Curt Hoglund Property 58,690 Maurice Hoglund Property 98,584 Lot 19, 81k 3, Hoglund Addition 5,485 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS $256,036 in addition to the assessable portion of $256,036, it was proposed that a 16" watermain be installed along East County Road 39 from the intersec- tion of County Road 75 and East County Road 39 to the Intersection of East County Road 39 with Mississippi Drive at a cost of approximately S30,000, which was proposed to be picked up on ad valorem or general property taxes. Prior to the Council meeting, the City Engineer mor and reviewed with the property owners and the City Staff the feasibility report as presented. At that meeting, Maurice Hoglund indicated concern over the amount of assessments his property would have East of County Road 39. Mr. Hoglund indicated he did not know at this time how he would plan to develop his 20 acre plat, and felt that the $98,000 in assessments as proposed seemed quite high if he had to install additional sewer and water exten- sions withfn his property in the future. In addition, Maurice Hoglund would be assessed for water only at his home site, and indicated he would like to see the sewer and water re-routed somehow so that the northerly portion of his homesite property could be developed into additional residential lots and be served by sewer dnd water. As a result of these discussions with the property owners, Maurice Hoglund will be determining what type of development he may be proposing for his 20 -acre plat along with a possible layout of a subdivision of his northerly half of his homesite property. The engineer noted that it is possible that sewer and water Could serve the Macarlund Townhouse Development in a different fashion as proposed in the feasibility study, and that the sewer and water could he tied into Mississippi Drive through an easement through some of the Lots in Hoglund Addition Plat. If this were feasible, the MaCarlund Townhouse Site would receive sewer and water as requested and possibly Maurice Hoglund's Homesite could receive sewer and water, thus eliminating installing portions of sewer and watermain along East County Ro,id 39 and County Road 75 thus reducing the cost of the project. If the feasibility study is redone to figure rerouting of the sewer and water to Mississippi Drive, the watermain would not he looped and as a result, Macarlund Plaza Townhouse development would probably have to install booster pumps to provide adequate water pressure throughout the development. Because of the uncertainty from the property owners Over how they would like the sewer and water extended through the area and because of the problem that exists today in that the City cannot sell bonds to finance such a project unless the State laws are changed to allow a higher interest rate on the bonds, motion was made by Dan 8ionigen, seconded by Phil white and unanimously carried to continue the public hearing on the 1980-1 project until the next regular Council Mgeting April 14, 1988 to give Maurice Hoglund and other property owners in the area more time to decide how they would plan to develop their property and to also see what happens in regards to the bond irrtertst rate limit in the State Legislature. - 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - 3/24/80 4. Consideration of Developinq Guidelines for Industrial Revenue Bonds. Purpose of this item was to consider the development of guidelines to be used by the City Council of Monticello when determining whether t0 issue Industrial Revenue Bonds. Primary concern of the Council was whether guidelines should be established before the City approves the issuance of industrial Revenue Bonds since more and more industries and businesses are requesting such bonds to help make it economically feasible to develop in a community, City Administrator had gathered criteria established in three other communities who issued industrial revenue bonds, and the following basic requirements were recommended by the City Administrator if adoption of guidelines were established by the City Council. A. Copy of the last two certified annual audits, if available. If a Compdny Inas not previously had a rertified audit, a copy of the un- audited financial statements should be made available. B. Dunn 8 Bradstreet rating, if available. C. Realistic forecast.for the next three years. D. Ratio of long term debt to equity after issuance of proposed bonds should not exceed 2 to 1. E. Net earnings before tares and depreciation should cover long term requirements by 2 to 1. F. If a certified audit is not available for the last two years because the company is either a new company or has not had a certified audit. an opinion should be obtained by the CPA stating that the applicant does have the ability to meet the debt service requirements based on past and/or future earnings. The above six guidelines recommended were a combination of the require- ments used by other communities to help establish that industries granted industrial revenue bonds would be of a r•clidblr; nature, thus helping reduce the possibility that they would default on the bonds, which would in turn, give the City a bad name as far as bonding issues goes. Although the Council felt developing guidelines should be accomplished in the near future. this item was tabled for further review to enable Councilmen and City Staff to meet with bonding consultants to discuss additional guideline procedures and recommendations to set up realistic guidelines for the City. it was noted that too harsh of a guideline would possibly eliminate the entire purpose of industrial revenue bonds. and that is to create new jobs and employment and increase the tax base in rural communities. - 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - 3/24/80 5. Consideration of Resolution for Life Insurance Coveraqe throuq h Payroll Withholdinq - City Administrator. Purpose of this item was to consider a resolution for life insurance coverage for Gary Wieber, City Administrator, through a payrol 1 withholding type plan. The City Administrator had indicated he would like to purchase a life insurance policy whereby the City of Monticello would pay the premium on the life insurance for a $50,000 policy, and this premium amount would, in turn, be deducted from his gross salary. The City, in effect, would be the owner of the life insurance policy, but the resolution would authorize any proceeds from the policy to be paid to the City Administrator's beneficiary as named. By using this method of payment whereby the City would make the payment in iieu of the individual, this amount would not be taxable income to the City Administrator. Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Ken Maus to make available life insurance coverage as an elective for any non-union employee and to have rho City nav the Premiums involved with the amounts deducted from thy salaries of the employee. It -was noted that this motion would he subject to approval of the legal opinion of the City Attorney. Voting in favor: Fran fair, Ken Maus, Arve Grimsmo, Phil White. Opposed: Dan Blonigen. (See Resolution 41980 06). 6. Approval of Bills S Minutes. Motion was made by Phil White, seconded by Fran Fair and unanimously carried to approve the Minutes of March 10, 1980 regular meet iog and the bills for the month of March 1980, as presented. (See Exh ibit 3/24/80 al). 7. Discussion on floodinq Problem in Balboul Estates. City Engineer, John Badalich, reviewed with the Council the present flooding problem incurred in the ponding areas between Anders -Wilhelm Estates and Balboul Estates. Currently, because of the frozen ground and the water runoff, the ponding area between these two devel opments lids caused flooding to a couple of homes in Anders Wilhelm Estates and Balboul (states. City Engineer, John Badalich, indicated that. the ponding area was supposed to be graded to a 9-14 elevation by the developer, Marvin George of Princeton, and although elevations have not been established by the engineering staff, it is assummed that the grading was not completed according to the grading plan. An item that compounded the problem is that a couple of the homes in the area did not conform to the individual plat grading plan, whereby some homes have walkout basements that according to the grading plan should not have. it was noted that the developer, Marvin George, will be informed that the grading of the ponding area was not completed according to the grading plan, and he will be notified that this procedure should he corrected. 5- 7 COUNCIL MINUTES - 3/24/80 B. Miscellaneous. It was noted that the Board of Review meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 13, 1980 at 7:00 P.M. by the Wright County Assessor's office to review with Citizens of Monticello any questions they may have in regards to the market value of their property established for the year 1980. Meeting adjourned. RickWolfsteller Assistant Administrator RW/ns - 6 - f 0:.4RELL L. WOLFF Ctrunly Sherlff Honorable Mayor City Council Monticello, Minn. 55362 Centleron: .SMOBFF'n► OFFICE (curl Hoow — Wrisht, Counfy ,dUFFALO, MINNESOTA SS313 Telephone 682-1161 ad.Em g—v But. No. 0823800 8:00--4:30 :00em.-4:30 pin. Il w, James F. Powers, Chief Deputy 24 Hour EmervmLy 7e1ephonet F,etro 4736673 V inticello 2952533 neleno 9124924 C•.keto 2865454 March 31, 1980 Enclosed is the Sheriff's Low Enforcement report for the month of February, 1980. 536 hours of patrol service were contracted for during the period in which the folluw;ng activities t:ere tallied: 1 - Report of theft of money from patients at the Nursing Home - under investigation 1 - Runaway - located 1 - No pay customers at Perkins 1 - Theft of spray gun R fittings from Mobil Cor Wash 3 - Arrests for shoplifting at Snpders Drug Store 1 - Burglary at Monti Liquor Store - cash token - under investigAtion 2 - Thefts of tools from trucks larked at Joyners Lones 1 - Burglary of residence - color TV missing - under In vestigation 1 - Theft of some silverware 6 ring from residence - cleared by arrest 6 items recovered 1 - Theft of a battery from n vehicle 1 - Theft of warning lights from Freeway Standard wrecker - under investige..tion I - Theft of radiator core from cement truck I - Civil matter - cleared 5 - Subjects arrested for a burglary of a residence which occurred in January - items were recovered 1 - Subject arrested for allot:ing dog to run at large - ordinance violation 2 - Arrests for Issuance of worthless checks 3 - Subjects arrested for defrauding the innkeeper of Perkins 3 - Animal complaints 2 - Domestics 3 - Disturbances I - Snowmobile complaint 4 - Suspicious circumstances A vehicles 1 - Intoxicated person I - Harassment 1 - Threatening ph oue calls - cleared by mediation 2 - Medical aids 4 - 1raffic complaints i DARRELL L. WOLFF Cwnly Sherlll - ' i Sg1�1�l��'S OFFICE Cwr1 Maute — WrIght County BUFFALO. MINNESOTA 55513 Telephone 462.116 N—E—G--V Bu- No. 6623900 8:00 em. • 0:30 pm. Sheriff's report for Monticello for February 1980 continued: 1 - Civil matter 8 - Alarms sounded - all checked out o.k. 123 - Car 6 subject checks 36 - Citizen aids 23 - Motorists warned 18 - Accidents investigated 72 - Traffic tickets issued: 2 - Driving while intoxicated 2 - Careless driving 1 - Erratic driving 20 - Speed 4 - Stop sign 2 - School bus stop sign violation 4 - Open bottle 1 - Improper lane usage 3 - Driver license violation 5 - Improp r registration 1 - Unsafe equipment 27 - Illegal parking Yours truly, Darrell Wolff, Sheriff Billing: For the month of February, 1990 -- $ 0.00 . . &5 James F. Powers. :hiet Deputy 24 Mow E—%p- . TaMph— Vrtm 473 473 I.t ticellc 15.2533 Oelano 97" -924 Loksw 28 • 454 QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE MONTICELLO FIRE DEPARTMENT President — Jim Maurice Vice President — Marn Flicker Secretary — Lee Trunnell Treasurer — Willard Anderson Chief — Paul Klein Joint Committeeman — Lee Trunnell Assistant Chief — Gordon Link Training Officer — Gene Jensen 1st Captain — David Kranz Asst. Training Officer — Ted Farnum 2nd Captain — George Liefen The following is a quarterly report of the Monticello Fire Department from Jan. 1, 1980 thru March 31, 1980. There were 16 personal assists by the Chief and/or assistant chief. There were 14 fires which required 324 man hours. The average attendance at a fire was 16.5. During the past three month period there were 3 training sessions which required 111 man hours. The average attendance at these training sessions was 22 men. The Dept. manned a booth at Expo '80. We showed a film and served coffee at the booth. Also, 4 men attended the sectional school at Brainerd on March 1.2. They were Greg Dahlheimer, Ted Farnum, Paul Klein and Jerry Wein. Respectfully submitted by, 4WI% David B. Kranz G" Reporter bik 0 Cat,ni M110rIIii eI10 250 East Broadly 110N"i (CELLO. MN 55362 Sopteml)er 1 L , 197 Mr. Paul Klein Fire Chief Monticello, ••ln. 55362 RG: Budqet for tho Fire llepartment for 19R0 and Traininq Reimbursement Cost Dear Paul: At their last meeting, the City Council did approvr_ the $30.00 per day per diem request by the Monticello Fire Department for attendance of memlxnrs at training sessions. Inaddition to the per rliem approved, also approved was a preliminary budget for the Fire Fund, copy of which is enclosed. Of some concern to the. Council was the training costs which wore $332.00 in 1977, $667.00 in 1978 and while $900.00 was budgeted in 1979, it would appear that this will approach $2,000 for 1979. In 1980, on the preliminary budo,tr A figure of $1,400 was approved. The Council felt that the trainina sessions that arc attended by the volunteer firemen certainly have merit, but there is concern by the City Council that in 1979, the figure will be more than five timen what was spent in 1977 for training costn. Should you or the membern of the fire department have, any questions In thin regard, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Gary Wiober City administrator GW/nn `cet Piro Dept. Corroo. 0 A:llrJWAAuPAAC VIBRATORY COMPACTORS M rA PRODUCTION cBAI:';CEO DESIGN I OR i I E It i' A'SF i OZ. 10.% IL),1AGL .IDBS it.lLAti,tll:.sc:w1„ COMPACTIONn"14;UA,D{NSI1, :;tint act i 1Ni St I t:+ L, 14 000LEIS Of Ct t.1H{t UG,` 1 �)H<[ lCUU VYL1 VERSATILITY c t,a..n{s.uEr.n•ul ••n;r;S L,F111t1r �. .[:'.! c,u,.lI1,C.i1r,slHt,(,trrc;,a;.,NLf t,U:,St:"r;:tl,ct�a RELIABILITY 1.,1411{ t:IINE:liiir r;:ti HANDLING _ i.I III {'.t A,AN+rrv, ,.•„illnv 4P{1+:.: ,;, , u,,t c,Ni \'itiititt r,t .:,N ti. FEti SERVICE L I r;: 41 AN 11 N A t:C I ,•N1, 1010.101 j" ;.,.I i „ d'H,'i r, L t liSY$t{L, I 1 <� MoOr L FtV -1 NkeOS M lNo-z r— l� The CG -08 self-propelled.vibrafory, asphalt roller is the best in its field for increasing productivity and profitability on those, hig low tonnage, h profit asphalt jobs in confined areas. It pro- vides superior reliability with a nsinimum,of downtime, unex� ,celled operator comfort, visibility and safety. The CG -08 compacts more.tons perdollar invested than other machines. in its 'class. It offers'a balanced ratio of static and dynamic forces,across its 36 inch wide vibratory drum. It pro- vides, optimum density, low permeability and smooth surface finish on all mix designs and lift thicknesses with 4,000 -lbs. of, centrifugal force and 1606 vpm Vibration frequency. Designed with the operator'in;mind, the CG -08 hes.unexcelled visibility,.safety and comfort. The operator has a -clear view of the rolling edge and can ,operate in confined areas because of the CG -08's excellent maneuverabilty,and.short turning radius. Fingertip control of vibration -it provided by a push button, on the forward and reverse lever, that controls the e_lectr_o• magnetic clutch. Additional value features include a 52, gallon gravity fed sp-inkler system with adjustable,neoprene drum'cleaners and cocoa mats. The spray system is rustproof through3ut and can be controlled from the operator's seat. A 14.2 hp Wisconsin S140."gas engine is standard RngD LG P, 0 w;TL NN k5":) 1980 OL.O kokI& c Iry 4145 VIBRASTAT It Super Smooth Hydrostatic Operation... Maximum Power VVIlir pal mJrte) !lr sometnrng you dont get you r•. l 'n'r tint weal y0ugrnbut .%,Ih VrbraStat II lhoo6 .,. n "I I' m Trp speed mato horsetmhrr and r'ahy : , ^4' "i• !I., i Pera4•r V.erast,t• I r I-, I !no out►tand,nq teatules of V1bw ~prim, up it) a Iii MPH a 16 HP engine a'n n,#.+a.Ir,::lrr.�nt~peedduertionand braking Tr.rr.1'r,i �.,i't,lahydfnt.ltl.'systemthatlsmUn•IM1 .ar,.tt� r ..i' !.` rn:1, mum spPens ort edher duoc0(jn ind w.!h ,err l'.1 p.rnn 314 mutts A ,1• j, ,r, ,1 !� nr.d excnanget .Viols all ttio W in Ihtt n1]r.t ay►tr'n 0 oust vele muiute Cooler hydiauhc IC^7prr it�h'S qul'antee mas,mum power under the -0s, srlr r .l.r4 ng Conon,-n:. 1Vn1 ^ t 'nn IN, 'Milder In ,tit Bald Chlhsw CraUP I SPECIFICATIONS ENGINE: Briggs and Stratton 16 HP 12 volt electrical system with Ignition hey ►lana and 10 amp alternator, TRANSMISSIONI Hydrostatic. Infinitely variable to e 5 MPH to sithet direction, Integral pump,ano motor roptaceoble;tatof erd heal exchanger STEERING Automotive with Timken pivot. BRAKE: Mechanical d sC type, automallc through drive system MAINORIVE No, 60 1 pllch roller churn SPEED, To s 5 MPH In elther dlrectiml OVERALL LENGTH. ... , 91.5 4nf haS OVERALL HEIGHT ..... 67 inches OVERALL WIDIN .... ,.. .ter 5lnches WHEELBASE 62 S mches TURNING RADIUS... 6 tool COLOR Omaha Orange SHIPPING WEIGHT 27SO pounds WORKING WEIGHT BALLASTED 4000 pounds VIBRATOR Two 38 counter Totaling eccentric steel shah% V bell driven with separate clulch Up to I hog VPM (gives corn paation in excess of 10 ton static rollers) COMPRESSION ROLL .. .. 22 dismstn by 26 GUIDE ROLL - .. Split 20 dismerer by 20 ROLL SCRAPER . Two each roll WATER SPRINKLER Front and rear separate contra% WATER TANK Non•carosive polyethylene e2 gallon capacity COMPACTION PrOmlee% Marshall Densities on asphalt end Proctor Daniel" on granular material in excess of 12 ton stoic fallen OPTIONAL EOUIPMENT: lot extra coal) Coccamau hydrauim Transport allsohmenl nal bed trailer GUARANTEE 2months against detective material 0, workmern ■ upwml OUR 100MY OF IYPROVEYTNT rW 1AC rally RrsTRvis TNI ROOM? TO 41000 1 OPECerCATIONS WITMOVf NnrlCe OR OaUOA rlpN 0• C�O TION.- KoWer Kol tingle cylinder, air cooled 4oyete engine. UnlW�ee solid top'eonstruction prevent$ erelter fouling. Qoepiellon forte 3.000 lbs. pet blow._ 4400 blown per min; travels up to go him..-' :CId 'ngo7"uponsollcy ontlillons)!, Olabl II0N" a 7 For last COripP.."10Of! P!,60th bdil and: HOm01d0'a soil combaClOr PCS•30 for clo o-tn dbbO5Cti6n' uW lh OptiOnD asphplfuse _Name, bid pinto - "' daltrieial3,000 ma par Clow, onil,u:,ns exton'siGn cho 9IU co4or'groatf}r pactgla.,..devc!bo;ng'4,400tough- , �anell iclerimpovy,dulyair cleaner. to area. Theca'rfi7gnr{>3it)It):UmU;hp>fl. pitnpor:m:nwo„Rugged geal'on'.. hcopciuctoul:Tnoasphalt comtractor aComdaclinrjlJicaol'oltnOrt,750 fea)uroB llk.e vlorailOn inotaletl deck PCA-2D'dovelops'2;000 Ibs, per ms: or,2000'Iha; pct bla±v;oq,� St end .hanolo,rnaka i1 easierI an the blOWand a cpcelat,handlo mounted ravel cliecd up to JOD It h n. ,k oporalor., Icughgepthotoil:Andi_aaforldrib��loy✓n,Qdl�afifilo"Ilow rubberttiui:k:mpsinicd"ti5tt�lo '-' S1 n travel:sVeeq up'to 90 11, 6cr::..: during opermion, ibriuensv.btau0n, uio' atetKri ebtlanoquic�iy; Horoetiio,tammera'aroideatumn, Thr n - -g.. 2a 0 � V1 6, n 110 GALLON TANK SKID AND TRAILER MOUNT SPRAYER UNITS ENGINEERED FOR DEPENDABLE SERVICE Model K 10-7-110T Minnesota Wannet field proven sprayer units equipped with radial positive displacement pumps give outstanding performances handling a wide variety of solutions. Free floating design of saddle mounted tanks prevents damaging stresses. Return lilies to tank bottoms to provide good agitation. Strainers easily accessible for cleaning without loss of solution. Tanks with 16" manhole. Hose hanger brackets on rear tank head. TRAILER AND SKID MOUNT MODELS MODEL 0 A L S/MIN. PRESSURE ENGINE MOUNI 1<10.7•IIOT 10 G.P.M 500 P.S.I. 7H,P, B $ S Trailer K10.7-IIOS 10 G. P, M. 500 P. S. 1. 7H.P. B 8 S Skid K10.3.11OT 10 G.P.M. 225 P.S,I. 3H.P. B 8 S Trailer K10.3.110S 10 G.P.M. 225 P.SI• 3 M.P. B 8 S Skid K3.3.110T 3 G. P. M, 600 P.S.I. 3H.P. B g S Troller K3.3.11OS 3 G. P. M. 600 P.S.I. 3H.P. B $ S Skid Trailer Mount Dimensions: 40" height, 38" width, 8'-4" length Skid Mount Dimensions: 31" height, 30" width, 6' length Trailer Unit Equipped with Clods Type Hitch 8 Stand - 16 a 6.50 . 8 Floototion Pneumatic Tiros. SPRAY ACCESSORIES AVAILABLE TO FIT YOUR REQUIREMENTS Manufactured by MI24NZSOTA6 WAWN$R COMPANY Sias rDEN AVtNLIE SOUTH - MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 69436 No. 110.71 PHONE: (612) 9291070 F e.n E Optional TLT Trailer with Terra Tires converts Myers Skid can sprayers 10 trail behind riding lawn tractors or turf carts. TLT trailer complete with hitch. toot standard and 4 ply 1B x 9,00 x B Terra Tires. Custom designed sprayers with choice of 40 GPM -30 PSI or 10 GPM -- 300 PSI parlor mance range. Optional anchor kits to fit Toro Workmaster, Otis Westeoaster. E•Z•Go Maintenance Machine and other utility carts. Lightweight, easy to install and remove. Optional gun for spraying Irees and shrubs. TLI2TMG tractor mounted sprayer with economical PTO drive. Basic SOrOyOr has 100 g• I,borgla55lanh, 12 GPM -500 PSI tk .nance range Optional 21' galvanized Loom hag 13 Teeiet nozzles Owed 20' npnrt. 0 GPM 300 PSI model also nvailable. The VTL10 series sprayers Oro avallablo for fairway and general Curl maintonanco In trailer or skid models and feature 200 pullon liburglass tanks. Pump has 10 GPM - 500 PSI porfoir anco rnngo, Powered by 7 HP single cylinder, 4 cyclo air cooled engine or PTO drive. Unh piclured OhOws eptionnl dual wide track running gear with Terra Tues (regularly furnished with wheol5 for 15" lues) MACARLUND PLAZA (BLACKS 2 - 11) ONLY Estimate of cost to connect to sewer and water on Mississippi Drive from Macarlund Plaza Apartment Complex (blocks 2 - 11) Sanitary Sewer $ 17,400 Watermain 11,400 Storm Sewer (Add. 60' from west) 2,300 Street Repair (Mississippi Drive) 1,500 Total $ 32,600 Indirect Costs (208) 6,600 Total Additional Cost $ 39,100 Service Extension & Storm Sewer 78,468 Total $117,668 Add Future Sewer and Water Assessment on County Road 139 14,809 Total Project Cost $132,477 Cost under Original Project $ 93,277 (Extra) Difference in Cost 5 39,2uu *Subtract Cost to Maurice Hoglund (3 units @ $5,500) $ 16,500 Net Additional Cost to Macarlund Plaza Apartment Complex (Blocks 2 - 11) $ 22,700 • If this property is subdivided into more than 3 lots, this amount would increase, lowering the net additional cost to the apartment complex. IV /V -6a aeP1O►n,JC2 r�wo...avr t!oaW,N& PA.erro Pa tm.L Ta Fl,*AO.$A - o�F Pur CSF A PCJaL,,iea Waw+W* To j 6NLK po &p64* ON AM&rlD^j OG .0"T - j, fie- 6W&LD .5r I { %PC A06ar Tv APo�y F.t Vgsiww�t�- {r . el d 0& TV ,Q 0TEo GA+vwVb ! I I SO //IJT �� Ne+�« OP A�Pto✓q` o� �i.►o•.VL l