City Council Agenda Packet 03-28-1983AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
March 28, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve A. Grimsmo
Council Members: Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Ken Maus and Jack
Maxwell.
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting Held on March 14, 1983.
3. Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests, and Complaints.
Public Hearinq
4. Consideration of Change Order #90.
S. wuniuuaaLiuu uC a P.LiLi.,u Lu abbubb Cuitaiu Pi Ok,ciLim.
Tabled since December 13, 1982 Council Meeting.
New Business
G. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the sale of bonds for
the Purpose of Making Public Improvements to Meadow Oak Sub-
division.
7. Consideration of Appointments to an ad hoc Committee to
Negotiate the Transfer of the Remainder of Block 17, Original
Plat, from the School to the City.
B. Consideration of Changing the data of the 2nd meeting in May.
9. Consideration of March bills.
10. Adjournment.
C
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONfICELLO CITY COUNCIL
March 14, 1983 - 7:30 P. M.
Members Present: Arve A. Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Jack Maxwell, Ken Maus,
Dan Blonigen.
Members Absent: None.
2. Approval of Minutes.
A motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by Maus to approve the
minutes of the regular meeting held on February 28, 1983 as
presented. Voting in favor were Grim --mo, Maxwell, Maus, and
Plonigen. Fair abstained due to her absence from the last
meeting.
4. Continuation of Public Hearinq on Proposed Improvements - Meadow
Oak.
:'u'. G.C1. h::.a ..eve v1'.1 uvL B—",; yr Jltin riwuue, levuiupein .i Li -
first phases of the Meadow Oak subdivision plat, requested that
part of the project they originally intended to do under a private
contract now be assumed under the City contract to be known as
82-2 Improvements. The added portions would be to extend water
main to the lift station from whore the City had originally planned
to discontinue work and to install sanitary sewer from the lift
station down to the beginning of the first phase of the manufactured
housing plat. in addition, they requested that the parking lot to
be constructed near the lift station be part of the City's improve-
ment and that additional street and otorm sower construction be in-
cluded in the City's project from the beginning of the manufactured
housing plat to the entrance along Highway 152. Also, they roquestod
that the hydronta and leads bo deleted along the water main from
Oakwood Industrial Park to the Meadow Oak Subdivision as this land
will continue to bo farmed and the hydrants mycause problems with
farming operations. The majority of those itomu were originally
planned to W constructed privately by the developers but thoir
request would be to have the City contract and do th000 items, with
the property in the oubdivioion loving asueaeod for those improve-
ments. The developers also requoated that those additional improve-
ments amounting to approximately $76,000 1x1 assessed over phases
two, three, four and five as they fool thio would provide more
equitable distribution of the projoCL cost by lots by eproading
uumu of these initial coats over a larger area to make Cho lots
more affordable during the initial stages of the project.
Council Minutes - 3/14/63
The additional work of 576,000 would be reduced by the elimination
of the hydrants by $40,000, resulting in a net increase to the City's
contract of approximately $36,000.
Public Works Director, John Simola, noted that because of the long
length of water main necessary to reach the subdivision, during the
initial stages of the development, the water useage will probably
be low which could result in old or stale water being used by the
homes. The water could be sitting in the water mains for a long
time before being used and Mr. Simola noted that possibly in the
near future, the City will have to consider looping the water mains
to provide more flow through the area. It was also the director's
recommendation that at least two or three hydrants be left in the
project from Oakwood Industrial Park to the subdivision for the
purpose of allowing the City crews to flush the hydrants.
After reviewing the requests made by the developers, a motion
was made by Maxwell, seconded by Maus and unanimously carried to
close the public hearing.
S. Consideration of Final Plat - Meadow Oak.
Tile final plat regarding the Meadow Oak Subdivision Inas recently
been oubmrtted and the developers requested that final approval
be given. The initial plat will be known as Meadow Oak and will
consist of 16 outlots. Phase I of the development will also in-
clude two additional replotting of two outlets into what will be
known an Meadow Oak Estates and Meadow Oak Second Addition.
All park land dedication has Leen agreed to by the City and the
developers and additionally, covenants will be established as
part of the subdivision. The Planning Comniosion at a previous
meeting approved the final plat no submitted contingent upon
the developers acquiring good title to the property which was
recently completed on March 4, 1983.
Thoroforo, a motion woo made. by Maxwell, seconded by Fair and
unanimously carried to approve the final plat for a Meadow Oak
Eutdivision as submitted creating 16 outlets and replotting of
two of the outlets into Meadow Oak 6utatos and Meadow Oak
Second Addition.
6. Consideration of a Resolution Ordering Public Improvements and
Awardinq Contract - Meadow Oak. '
As discussed earlier in the m=eting, in regard to the project
scope, a motion was made by Maus, seconded by Fair to agree
to initially amend the project scope to include additional
water main, sower linen, street, storm sower and parking im-
provcmcnts to the City project 62-2 for improvements to the
Meadow Qak Subdivision per the letter dated March 8, 1983,
by ultra Iiomso.
- 2
Council Minutes, - 1/14/83
The additional construction estimated at approximately $76,000
would he added to tine r:iLy' s project and re -assessed to the
benefited property in the Meadow C�ik SuL,livision. Voting in
favor were SLtus, Fair, Grimsmo and Maxwell. Opposed was blonigun.
A motion was made by Fair, seconded by laxwell and unanimously
carried to adopt a resolution ordering the improvements to
Meadow Oak Subdivision and accepting the low bid from Richard
54iutson, Inc. in the amount of $731,095.55 and authorizing the
contract to be awarded. Sae Resolution 1983 069.
7. Consideration of Ratification of Revised Contract with OSM,
Consulting Einginecrs.
Consultiny Eingineer, John fladalich of USM, recently sulmitted
a revised contract between his firm and the City of Monticello
fur enginceriny services.
The engineering contract as presented spells out the engineering
fees for all improvement projects anti other work performed by
the engineer for the City of Monticello. The contract is proposed
to be renewed annually.
A motion was made by Fait, seconded by Maus and unanimously
carried to approve ratifying tLe engineering Contract with 05:3
all aulmiLted.
R. Consideration of hloption of a Pre-treatment Ordinance.
As part of the PTA regulati.0110, Ulu City is requited to develop
and enact an ordinance to control newer discharges and industrial
pretreatment. Thu ordinance would take ti,ffect on January 1, 1983
and io dusignt:d to control polluLanLs which may cause problems
with tlw WauLewatet Treatment Plant, I1:01tibit pollutants which we
cannot treat and improve upportuniLiev to reclaim and recycle
wautawatur and sludges.
The ordinance affects all users, large and small, but primarily
would affect wrightco prWtICLu, which is now Lhu lnrguat induutrial
liver and would require Wriglttco to uhtain a dischargo permit. A
typical industrial user gtanted ouch a permit would b: required
Lu pay a fee of $300 for the per IL which may run au 1011(3 as
five yearo. wrightco Protlucta }uta Won mooting with the City
ntaff regaidinq the pro-Ltuatmont ordinance and Wt'ighteo PraluCts
Iris indicated that. th,!y ate h4sically in agreement with the pru-
tr-calmcnL unlin:uaca an 1•rupus0d 1110 r'cvitoud. WrlohtCu product:;
also requested Lhat au 1,art of the ordinance adoption, that a
statement 1u inuorted into the record noting Lhat laaaed on in-
tonnation the City Of MunLi.ecllo currently 1100, wrightco would
meet all of tho provisions of the proposed Ordinance and would
1..: granted a discharge 1,urmit. 1t was noted that upon adoption
of LhU erdinancu, Cho Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and
Council Minutes - 3/14/83
CPA would still have to approve the final draft of the ordinance
-- and then Wrighteo Products would make application for their dis-
charge permit.
A motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by Fair and unanimously
carried to adopt a pre-treatment ordinance as submitted. See
ordinance amendment 1983 470.
9. Review of Year End 1982 Liquor Store Financial Statements.
Mark Irmiter, Liquor Store Manager, was present at the Council
Meeting to review with the Council the year end financial state-
ments for 1982.
Sales for the year were up approximately $3,000 but due to in-
creased operating costs, the operating income decreased approxi-
mately $7,000 over 1961. operating income for the year totalled
$77,760. The financial report for the year after reviewing was
accepted as presented.
10. Consideration of a Proposed Job Description for Zoninq Adminis-
trator/ Buildinq Official.
Tne City iuiminisLraLu suuniLLu,l to CL,: Cuuuoil a pccy,in d joL
description to be used to fill the vacancy the City currently J
has in the zoning administrator/building official department.
A job description as written also would include the possible
addition of a City assessor which could la combined with the
building official and zoning administrator position. Although
it was noted that it may be difficult to find an individual
with all of the necessary qualifications, it was recommended
that if the job description was approved for advertising, the
auuesaor's position could be noted as being desirable but not
necessary.
A motion wan made by fair, seconded by Blonigen and unanimously
carried to approve the job description as presented provided
it was noted that the anseasor's qualifications would be desirable
but not mandatory and to authorize tlw City to advertise for the
position.
Currently tho City of Monticello is contracting with
building inspector from the City.of Elk River. The individual
from Elk River has indicated that duo to Increased activity
expected shortly, he will no longer be able to provide building
inspection services for the City of Monticello. Because of thin,
a motion was made by Blonigon, seconded by Maxwell and unanimously
carried to authorize the City Administrator to negotiate with Mr.
Jay Miller for the purpose of employing his services on a part
time hmola for the interim as building inspector and zoning J
administrator.
Council Minutes - 3/14/83
Discussion on Improvements to County Road 75 (Broadway).
John Simola, Public works Director, noted that on Tuesday,
March 15, 1983, he will be appearing bA ore the Wright County
Board of Commissioners and asked if the City should request
that the County consider improving County Road 75 or Broadway
this year. The street is currcnLlydeLc r1urnLing and Mr.
Simola noted that if the County would resurface Broadway, the
City might be requested to contribute 3O% of the cost as its
share of the project. It was the consensus of the Council to
authorize Mr. Simula to request from the County Board that the
improvements be commenced and indicated a willingness to con-
sider a portion of the cost if necessary.
Assessed Valuation Ilearing.
it was noted by the City Administrator that May 2, 1983 at
7:00 P.M. is the date for the annual assessment hearing on
valuations for property located within Monticello.
AdopLion of Resolution Supporting Legislative Action.
A mnt.ion wns made by Maxwell. secondud by Maus and unanimously
carried to adopt a resolution supporting le ssage of a proposed
solid waste land fill bill Lhat is currently being proposed in
the Stale legislature. The propoued bill would establish re-
quirements that no land fill or solid waste disposal site
could be located within 200 yards of the Miusissippi River.
See Resolution 1983 069.
Meeting Adjourned.
/(7
v'
RicA Wolfst.oller
Auuintant Administrator
H
C
Le
Council Agenda - 3/28/83
4. Consideration of Change Order #90 With the Paul A. Laurence
Company on the Wastewater Treatment Plant Construction Contract.
(J. -Si
This change involves a centrifuge for the lab. We originally
ordered this piece of equipment thru field prod #57 in October
of 1981. The wrong unit was delivered, and since that time
the piece of equipment we specified has become out dated and
is no longer available. The new centrifuge is $450 more than
the one we originally specified and adding $67 profit and
overhead brings the total to $517.00.
If this change order is approved the remaining construction
funds including the grant amendment would be $39,852.93.
- 1 -
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
.a+ennrs 199,111111
IJss sre.,.on
4kP SCNIJl� f1A►'tRUN f ASSOCIATts. MC.
o.a�a� w ••:m cosi.+es rc
�eG'Ir!•-I..ulr...14•�ta 71 r...letp.S .q M.taetAy+rD,M.evY
Paul A. Lauience Co. serge Order %D. 90
godless F.O. Box 1267, 10000 Highway 55 West dleldlfodlf, ffa. 137
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55440 p►e)«r ob. 066-2748.01
Jot tocatlo0 M.cr.ticello, Minnesota tsfl Grant N,C270855-03
fe scccreatce an. tee fares of wow- contract dowse November 20 1980 elth
Citi of :';r.ticello pw„e, .o, V.VTP Upgrading and Appurtenant Bork
e•r ne•e:. •e:.rve: •r ea:•. r:•� the tr!'owl ns changes fro, the rontrap plans and.peel f seat Ions:
:t K' �.•tG e': J:f'•'�Ca'�C 4el •tr fo !laic ttod)t /137 IJftacte:l
Tho ]:::;ra;ors centrifuge previously speri`ie:'. in Field Modification 6;7
and Order i21 has been discontinued by the manufacturers. in order
.=e :gee -s c` t! -:c slant lahorstorv, an a:tenative desion is reo-uire;l.
�. ee•co.• C. Col's "is Csnge Ode•:
luta• te.10+11iroaterial Profit t Ore•heeo total Add Tdlei Deduct
$450.00 1$67.00 I $517.00 I
Hou-• of 0, 1;l not Czr',or; f 4. 704.000. 0D
Total Contract
:dere:• Tota! Atoll Ion
Tnr, d Total Deduct TA►e This C.O. /� 1
!4.�;5,3]E.0, I $517.00 I I $4,945,835.07
Ulg!os: Co••a,e•:•p 1,11 f
oaf Aeneln lug
1:0�1, tnru C.:. I_ Add ^.4 C.C. Deduct Tf!s C.O. I Co"IfI snclos
Tse•a •III be Y e/'ans ice of 0 dews to, daplatloe.
N ere V. •,e cv:te•for of Coat -an us Mas' 31 If 83 an: roe sul be May 31. j 83
e:•tt L. 0190 Sid -se
w
gs: olens: t, %ter`•• L"'TI yl' K 7� — �'1' Odtd l�Ogee .�I�I07
f , ♦Greg
f::'c•r t+ Csfe S e•e:
Council Agenda - 3/28/83
Consideration of a Petition to Re -Assess Certain Properties,
(Tabled since 12/13/82). (T.E.)
At the December 12th, 1982 meeting, Larry Flake presented a
petition signed by a number of owners who were affected
by the assessments of the 1978 and 1979 project. At that
meeting, the entire matter was tabled to allow Rick and I
to assemble added information that you could utilize in
making your decision. what we have done since that time is
talk with and meet with Jerry Schanon of Springsted to go
over the various alternatives. We concentrated our efforts
primarily on the 78 project since that was the one that had
only a five year assessment term. The 79 project had a 10
year assessment term as do many projects in the community.
We thought that were we to extend 10 year assessments to 15,
20 or beyond for one group of property owners, we would be
setting a precedent for changing assessment rolls for many
property owners involved with several non -related projects.
Thus, we concentrated our efforts on the five year assessment
roll which has hien generally agreed upon to be the most
problematical. After giving the information to Jerry
Sehanon and having him "ploy with it" for awhile, we arrived
at the following proposal. Basically, we would take the
original principal amount and seL it up on a 10 year assess-
ment roll dating from the original date, and the interest
rate would be the same, namely, 6.59. Based on that
assessment roll, we then determine what is delinquent had
that been the original assessment roll, both principal and
interest, as well as what would be due and payable in 1983.
We would then request of the property owners to pay that
amount and the remainder of the assessment would be spread
'
over the lost six yearn and at a lower rntc. It is our
opinion that it is absolutely essential that delinquencieo,
based upon the 10 year asseasmont, be paid in full before we
could consider adjusting the rate. Simply changing the
assessment roll, but allowing them to remain delinquent
provided absolutely no advantage to the City with rospect
to our caeh flow and our own debt retirement. in the case
of Marvin George, for instance, the adjusted delinquent
amount is still in excess of $300,000 and we do not realis-
tically anticipate receiving payment of that amount anymore
than we anticipate receiving payment of the current amount
that is delinquent. For that reason, we thought it would be
loot to make the ro-anacoament plan optional in that if the
property owner can pay the adjusted delinquencies then he/she
would have the privilege of having the assessment roll re-
adjusted; if a property owner can not or willnot pay the
adjusted delinquent amount, the original assessment roll
would stand as in.
M&M
Council Agenda - 3/28/83
Rick and I are also of the opinion that in order to do a re-
assessment we should have confirmation of a substantial number
of property owners that they are willing to go along with the
proposal. If we are faced with only having one or two persons who
would willing go along with the proposal, I find it to be more
than likely a waste of time.
Jerry Scha non of Springsted will be attending the meeting
Monday night, both on this item and the item to follow relating
to Meadow Oak. He perhaps, better than I, can explain the
workings of the re -assessment roll and how he arrived at the
figures that we did arrive at. Larry Flake was in to see me
recently and I indicated to him that I would be bringing the
matter to the Council for their review and discussion at this
toeing meeting and that we would invite the affected property
owners to attend the April 11th, 1983 meeting. What I indicated
to tarry was that giving the Council two weeks to review the
material should be adequate enough time to arrive at a decision
by the 11th, and that the property owners would be invited to
be there for that decision. I think it is somewhat important
to note that the bond issue that we are retiring has an eight
year term and for us to extend ten years isgoing beyond what
our own debt life is designed to be. You may wisn to raise
the quest ion to Jerry with respect to what would happen by
extending the assessment roll to 12, 15 or 20 years. The
precedent of changing beyond 10 years when we have so many
other 10 year projects, to me is a disadvantage. It also
strikes me that itis afinancial disadvantage to extend our
money recovery over a period Be much greater than our own
debt rotircmcnt term.
I think for this coming meeting, this particular Item is
primarily for information gathering. Since the property
owners will probably not be inattandanco, I suggest that the
final decision be laid over until Aprill 11th. That, of
course, would also allow for Arve'a return, so that a full
Council would be present.
RFF 6RF.NC6Si Samplo of the proposed re-aoaossment roll.
Lotter from Springotod, Inc.
- 3 -
101+DING PROCRAM
�1978
NSSE SSPE N1
M(V.P
PR MC EC TEO_ASSE
SSNENT_I
NCOME
MONIICELLO FORD
TILING
PlEI 1/ 1/1961
IL I•:F, DA TE:IOr:O/1079
F ILINo COLLECT
INT EPEST
YEAR
YEAR
PR IIC I PAL
E 6.505
TOTAL
1979
1920
3,;17
1,7411
.,353
1900
1911
3.117
209
3.971
1981
191?
3.117
137
3.719
19e7
1913
405
)•517
19e.
1921
3.117
70?
3.311
7 0 T N LS
lot/
15.560
).761
18,674
Te Ti16 TOTAL OP
INCLI7DL5
INILMLST INDM
I II. ING
1,555566
717
DATE TO
17/)1/1910.
foe �T
RGTVLAL� y
is.
550F•y�
PROJEC7C0 ASSES)NkNt INCONF
"N' 'CELLO FORD
FILING O A 7 E: 10/10/1979
C IL ING CGLLECT INT ERC ST
'CAR 7EAR PRINCIP., 0 6. 50t TOTAL
----- ------. ........ -- --
1979 1920 1,556 1,7411 7.797
19e0 I'll I 1, 55f 910 7,466
1961 Ile? 1.556 809 .765
,987 1911 1,556 708 7,764
1911 1911 1,556 607 7,163
1981 1965 1,556 506 7.067
1965 1986 1,556 105 1,961
19e6 1987 1,556 701 1,659
19e7 1918 1,556 ?07 1,75E
1988 1989 1,556 101 1,657
TOTALS 15.560 5,797 71,157
'INCLUDES INTEREST FRCN FII I•:G
DATE 10 17/31/1 SEO.
Now Ir we4A�1617 BC NAvD k)a. 0RAGrn/09Lt y Si -r
ThE �O1.E.
ire it to tGAW-S.
Twlf peapdSIPL bO&S AI MILLUD6 ?iMA6.Ty f twraQairom e.,vaalNr ULFAvpuspi"s
PRO JCC 7[D
ASS[SSM[NT IN(pME
MONE'T'O
FORD
TILING
PlEI 1/ 1/1961
L ]�
�RoPose
v
f IL ING
COLLECT
INTEREST
TEAR
YEAAPA
INC IPAt
If17, C0t TOTAL
AbJ,ar6 D
.......
.........
........
�0 ` L
1967
ISl1
1911
1911
9,!971
1, SS0
D 9.197
1,1707 7,076
Ty l e• S-- As FgpYg6
lot/
19et,
1.
911 7,.90
Te Ti16 TOTAL OP
1985
1916
1,555566
717
1get
1917
1.556
550F•y�
1917
1911
1,551
:11 1,979
Y .Vl�
19ee
1919
1,$56
lel 1,711
0 T416 Tial YfA4
+CTAlS
19.776
)•971 73.149
�cAl[aNV[.
'INCLUDES
1 9.2;7 LU -PS U.
'INClUO[S
-%;E-E'.:{:..• 4 {L I•,(
' SPRINGSTED
INCORPORATED
PUBLIC FINANCE
ADVISORS
II March 1983
Mr. Rick Wolfsteller, Assistant Administrator
City Hall
250 East Broadway
Route 4, Box 83A
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
RE: Outstanding Assessments for Project 1978-1
Dear Rick:
We have received your material regurding the assessments outstanding for file
1978 improvement project and also per our previous discussions, hove rerun the
data based on a 10 -year teen of repayment term rather than a 5 -year term.
For each of the six examples, we hove run three programs as follows:
Program I Original Term of Assessment
5 years @ 6.50% Poyable 1980-1984
Program II Rerun Original Amount of Assessment
10 years @ 6.50% Payable 1980.1989
Program III New Assessment Including Lump Sun
I Lump Sun . Payable 1983 - 6 years @ 12.00% Payuble 1984-
1989
Programs I and II are self explanatory. Program 111 was determined by taking
the total principul and interest due through December 31, 1983 to arrive at the
lump -sun payment. The remaining principal due was respread over 6 years at
12.00% interest. We note the interest rate was arbitrarily selected and is the
maximum rate permitted for uss,;ssments authorized during the month of
March.
In running these schedules we have arrived of some mathematical factors which
will assist you in determining the total principal and interest due through
December 31, 1983 and olso file principal remaining for the term of file
assessman t.
N c Original Amount Assessed
0.4 : Totol Principal Due 1980-1983
0.2358= Totul Interest Due from October 10, 1979 Thtouyh
December 31, 1983
0.6 Total Principal to he respread payable 1984-1989
800 Osborn Building, Saint Poul, Minnesota 55102 (612) 222-4241
250 Nonh Sunnystops Hoed, Droostlald. Wisconsin 6300514141 702.0222
_J
Mr. Rick Wolfsteller, Assistant Administrator
I I March 1983
Page 2
As on example, a typicul lot in Country Club Manor:
Lot 6 Block I
Step I N = 6,236.53
Step 2 0.4 x N = 2,495-> Lump Sum
Step 3 0.2358 x N = 1 ,472 3,967 > Total Principal Due
Step 4 0.6 x N = 3,742 7,709
You hove mentioned that some of the parcels have had one or two payments
made. For these parcels, follow Steps I, 2 and 3 above. Verify payments made
and identify the amount of principal, interest and penalties (it any). Subtract
the principal paid from the principal due and subtract the interest paid from the
interest due. The resulting figures, when added together will give you the lump -
sum payable. Then, subtract the amount of principal paid, including the lump -
sum principal due, from the amount originally assessed and the result is the
amount to be respread.
In the event the property owner has paid more than 40% of the principal due,
there will be no lump -sum due and the remaining principal should be respread
over the longer term.
Please r...:i free to caduct us it yuv neu i wty fur Ilroe ussisfanee.
Sincerely,
Gerard B. Shannon
Assistant Vice President
cc: Tom Eidem
/rim
Council Agenda - 3/28/63
6. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizino the Sale of Bonds for
the Purpose of Makinq Public Improvements to Meadow Oak Subdivision.
(T. E).
As I noted above, Jerry Schanon will be here with the resolution
authorizing the sale of bonds. Because he is running on a tight
schedule, his information will not be coming to the City until
sometime on Friday, so at this point it is difficult for me to
put together a very lengthy supplement for you. To date, Rick
has advised Jerry Schanon that the retirement schedule should be
proposed for ten years, and that anticipating some early delin-
quencies, the payment schedule should be weighted as much as
possible towards the later years rather than the early years.
What the actual sum of the issue will be, I do not know at this
time since Schanon will be developing the necessary figures in-
cluding capitalized interest, administration fees, etc. and will
incorporate all of those expenses into the sale. we fully antici-
pate having all of the reference material here by Friday so that
we can get it copied and out to you with your supplement. How-
ever, as I mentioned, not having it in my hand as of this writing
makes it difficult for me to expand any further on this topic.
- 4 -
t
Council Agenda - 3/28/83
7. Consideration of Appointments to an Ad Hoc Committee to Negotiate
the Transfer of the Remainder of Block 17. Oriqinal Plat. from the
School to the City. (T.E.)
A.s you recall several months ago, Barry Bondhus came before the
City Council to inquire about the development of the dedicated
park land in the block where the library has been built. we
noted at that time that the title of that land is still held by
the school, and I was instructed to contact the school about the
transfer. In the first conversation I had with Shelly Johnson
about this property, he indicated that there might be some
difficulties or some minor problems to work out and that he
would like to talk more about it at some time. That conversation
never really took place, and recently Fran asked where we stood
on the matter and I simply responded that I was waiting to hear
from Shelly Johnson on it. On Monday, the 21st, I talked with
Shelly and he said that he had mentioned it to the school board
and was requesting that one board member along with himself be
appointed to discuss the land transfer with members of the City.
I indicated to Shelly that since Fran was very interested in
the land that perhaps the Council would appoint her and me to
represent the City to meet with their two member negotiating
i—ly. Since T em Anticlneting the Stets to annrmncr the nnon-
ing of the grant program sometime in the near future, I think
it would be beat if Fran and I were assigned to work with
school representatives and attempt to negotiate the transfer
of this land. To data, I have already had Cary Pringle do
considerable research on this pioca of property and while he
noted that it is complex, it need not be a problem, so long as
we honor the restrictions on the land which, -as I understand,
we have ovary intention of doing. The only action that would
be required would be a simple motion and second appointing an
ad hoc committee of Fran and myself to negotiate this transfer.
- 5
t
Council Agenda - 3/28/83
8. Consideration of Chanqinq the date of the 2nd Meetino in May. (T.E.)
The second meeting of May is currently scheduled for Monday, May 23rd,
which is also the night that has been selected by the Business and
Industry Committee to hold the annual fund raising industry banquet.
At the most recent meeting of the committee, Arve and I both mentioned
that the date was in conflict with a Council meeting and the planning
committee for the banquet noted that it was also about the only open
Monday evening that it could be held since all of the other Monday
evenings presented substantial conflicts. Arve raised the question
at that time as to whether or not the Council meeting could be changed
to a different night. Given proper notice, it is very easy to re-
schedule a Council meeting and entirely legal to do so. Because
business and industrial development is considered to be one important
function of the City government, I think it would be wise to change
the meeting date so that members of the City government could be
in attendance at the banquet.
As the end of May approaches, depending on the work load and the
number of items projected for that meeting's agenda, you may oven
wish to postpone all business until the first meeting in June.
I suggest that this be a possibility nnly if the projected agenda
is extremely light in business items. At any rate, for the
�. purposes of long range planning, I think it would be best to
establish the alternate meeting date this coming Monday, being
as early as possible.
I�
L
C
R
CENERAI. FUND - MARCH - 1983
AMOUNT
NaLiunal Fire Protection Assoc. - Fire Code books
194.50
State Capitol Credit Union - W/li payroll ded.
179.04
MN.State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
43.00
Security Federal Savings - Money Market account
75,000.00
Wright County State Bank - To savings
80,000.00
Wright County State Bank - FWT - FEb.
3,623.9U
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H
1,496.87
Gwen Bateman - Animal lop. expense
364.12
Title Ins. Co. of MN. - Refund of assmts. over -paid
54.62
State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
73.00
State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
36.00
Blue Sky Marketing, Inc. - Pocket Data for MN. - 83-84
26.95
MN. Pollution Control Agency - Reg. fee for seminar - W. Mack
40.00
Tom Schumacher - Salary
128.00
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
45.00
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
18.00
State Treasurer - Social Sec. Cont. Fund - FICA
3,826.78
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - Feb.
1,919.68
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
179.40
11anl A. Laurence Co. - Payment 025 on WWTP
73,355.66
Gerald Hermes - Library janitorial services
115.00
Monticello Fire Dept. - Payroll 2/24 thru 3/13
629.00
North Central Public Service - Utilities
4,540.13
Northern States Power - Utilities
10,823.41
Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins.
2,475.40
DeBour Auto Body - Repairs to '78 GMC pickup
411.98
City of Elk River - Building Insp. services
179.70
MN. State Treasurer - Pera W/II
1,572.05
Rick Wolf a teller - Misc. mileage.
55.25
VOID
0
Cwen Bateman - Partial payment for March animal imp. expense
50.00
MN. State Documents Section - 1982 U.B.C. - one copy
40.00
U. S. Postmaster - 10 rolls - 20c stamps
200.00
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
29.50
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
61.00
Wright County State Bank - c. D, for 90 days
204,250.00
MN. State Treasurer - Pura W/11
454.34
Davis Electronic - 10 sets of batteries for pagers - Fire Dep.
51.50
Hawkins Chemical - 3 - l ton cyl. of chlorine
1,910.10
Equitable Life Assurance Society - Ins. W/ll - Karen 6 Matt
40.00
Bridgewater Telephone. - Telephone
671.48
Could Bros. Chov. - Fire Dept. expenso
5.40
St. Cloud Restaurant Supply - Towels and liners
41.15
Leer Bros. - Uniform rental fee
114,25
Weuterman Lumber Co. - hist. Bldg. supplies
9.46
Wright County Auditor police fines - Feb.
1,170.25
Dr. Joel Erickson - Juno - 82 thru Feb. - §3 - euth. fees
270.00
Stern, Levine, Schwartz, etc. - Legal - cbblr T -V study
469.00
Chapin Publishing - 82-2 Project adv, for bids
98.04
Our Own hardware - Misc. supplies for all Depts.
516.80
Olson Electric - Bridge park wiring - emorg. pump bldg.
143.05
SMA Elevator - Metal for WWTP
112.85
Lindberg Paint - 1 gal, paint - St. Dept.
19.23
General Safety Equipment Corp. - Fire truck tanker
38,990.00
Feed Rite Controls - Feed rite and tasting - Sewer/Water
940.98
9
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Wright County Sheriff - Police contract - Feb.
9,041.98
17Cg9
Charles Freidheim Co. - Break off blocks for St. Dtept,
58.6D
l:
Mobil Oil Corp. - Fire Dept. gas and oil
81.05
111u1
OSM - Eng, fees - (82-2 Project - 42,769.09)
51,910.22
17102
Wallace 6 Tiernan - Diaphram pump parts - WWTP
65.79
17103
State Chemical Co. - 7 gal. degreaser - St. Dept.
175.45
17104
Mid Central Fire, Inc. - 1 helmet. 1 set wrenches - Fire Dep.
130.00
17105
Indtnpendent Lumber - City hall expense
9.96
17106
Hoglund Bus Co. - Warning light on Fire truck
65.04
17107
Sentry Systems, Inc. - Lease on equip. fur reservoir alarm
140.00
17108
Barry's Auto Supply - Supplies for Sewer and St. Depts,
198.57
17109
Maus Foods - Supplies for all Dept$.
119.31
17110
Monticello Printing - Reductions
6.00
17111
Audio Communications - Repairs to Motorola base
191.15
17112
Curtis Industries - Nuts and bolts for St. Dept.
131.94
17113
Howard bahigren Assoc. - Feb. professional services
556.35
17114
National Bushing - Street supplies
1U8.80
17115
Marco Business Products - 4 doz. pads
12.03
17116
Muntiecllu Office Products - Desk signs, staples, pads, etc.
IU9.6U
17117
National Life Ins. Co. - Pension cont. - T'. Eidem
85.00
17118
Central McGowan, Inc. - Cyl. rental 6 oxygen
24.48
17119
Monticello Ford - Pin for St. Dept.
4.16
17120
Local 049 - Union dues
95.00
17121
Northwestern Bell - Fire phone
36.43
17122
O. K. Hardware - Snow plow parts
1.39
17123
Ist Bnnk of Mpls, - Publlr, fund activity chnrgl.
11.00
17.124
Dytron Alloys Corp. - Dytron for St. and Sewer Ucpts,
299.38
171')
Millipore Corporation - Lab supplies for WWTP
264.35
171:.1
Mr. Jerry Wein - Fire school
72.00
17127
Leifert Trucking - Freight on hydrant parts
15.00
17128
Century Laboratories - Sludge dead, and gear lube - Sewer D.
369.10
17129
Coast to toast - St., Sewer and Library supplies
316.53
17130
Smith Pringle Mayes - Feb. legal fees
525.00
17131
Tom F:idem - Misc. mileage, etc.
30.50
17132
MN. City Management Assoc. - Annual membership fees
25.00
17133
Waiters Cabinet Shop - Base and top cabinets - City Nail
400.00
17134
Payroll for February
19,162.58
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR MARCH - 1983
$596,906.56
LIQUOR FUND
LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS - MARCH, 1983
CFOs
N0.
State Capitol Credit Union - W/11 ded.
20.00
10637
Griggs, Cooper b Co. - Liquor
3,345.46
10638
Twin City Wine - Liquor
1,227.22
10639
Ed Phillips b Sona - Liquor
4,031.22
10640
Wright County State Bank - FWT - Feb.
578.60
10641
PERA - W/H
304.23
10642
State Treasurer - Social Sec. Cont. Fund - Feb.
469.02
10643
State Capitol Credit Union - W/II ded.
20.00
10644
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - Feb.
257.00
10645
Travelers Directory Service - Adv. for Liquor Store
109.00
10646
Banker's Life Ins. - Croup Ins.
276.58
10647
Ed Phillips b Sona - Liquor
5,068.71
10648
Old Peoria Co. - Liquor
1,221.00
10649
Griggs, Cooper b Co. - Liquor
3,471.50
10650
Twin City Wine - Liquor
408.40
10651
V01D
-
10652
State Treasurer - PERA - W/H
212.78
10653
PERA - Payment penalty
5.00
10654
Ed Phillips b Sons - Liquor
1,787.79
10655
Twin City Wine Co. - Liquor
1,010.87
10656
Thorpe Dist. Co. - Beer
2,599.10
10657
Dahlhcimer Dist. Co. - Beer
6,541.06
10658
A. J. Ogle Co. - Beer
836.05
10659
Crosslein Beverage Co. - Beer
8,231.75
10660
Day Dist. Co. - Beer
230.50
10661
Dick Beverage Co. - Beer
3,697.75
10662
Yonak Sanitation - Sanitation contract
82.50
10663
Granite City Cosh Register - Cash register tape
56.01
10664
Monticello Country Club - Adv. in calendar of events booklet
25.00
10665
Liefert Trucking - Freight
360.34
10666
Maus Foods - Misc. supplies
25.51
10667
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
106.50
10668
North Cuntral Public Service - Utilities
282.00
10669
Northern Slates Power - Utilities
483.01
10670
7 UP Bottling Co. - Misc. mdse.
280.90
10671
Jude Candy b Tobacco - Misc. mdse.
339.81
10672
Old Dutch Foods - Misc. mdse.
139.72
10673
Viking Coca Cola - Misc. mdse.
471.85
10674
MN. Stole Treasurer - Tera W/11
61.01
10675
Payroll for February - 1983
3.412.79
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS - MARC11
$52,087.54