Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 01-25-1982I AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELL40 CITY HALL January 25, 1982 - 7:30 P.M. Mayor: Arve Grimsmo Council Members: Fran Fair, Dan Blonigen, Ken Maus, Philip White. Meeting to he taped. Citizens Comments. 1. Continuation of Public Hearing on the 1961-1 Improvement Project Regarding the Proposed Assessment against the Edgar Klucas Parcel. 2. Consideration of a Set Hack Variance - Shaun McGoff. 3. Consideration of Amending various Zoning Ordinances. 4. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Economic Development Plan and Designation of Chamber of Commerce Business 6 Industrial Development as Advisory to the City Council. 5. Consideration of Approval of Change Order 022 with the Paul A. Laurence Company on the Wastewater Treatment Plant Construction Contract. 6. Approval of Final Construction Payment to LaTour Construction and Change Order 02 on the 1981-1 and 1981-2 Improvement Project. 7. Approval of Bills for month of January, 1982. B. Approval of the Minutes for the meeting hold on January 11, 1982. 9. Unfinished Business. 10. Now Business. Council Agenda - 1/25/82 AGENDA SUPPLEMENT 1. Continuation of Public Hearing on the 1981-1 Imurovement Project Peqardinq the Proposed Assessment against the Edqar Klucas Parcel. P?IRPOSF.: On October 14, 1981, the City Council held a hearing which included assessments on the 1981-1 Improvement Project. At that time it was decided to continue the hearing on the Edgar Klucas parcel since an objection to the proposed assessment of $37,206.32 was filed by Mr. Klucas. As I indicated at the last City Council meeting, I am recommending that there be no assessment on this parcel for the following reasons: - Real question as to benefit. - Portion of the property is on Green Acres. (Assessments on property for Green Acres are automatically deferred). - Likelihood of. appeal. - Ability Of City to recapture its cost at a later date. List below is further background on each one of the reasons listed above. Real question as to benefit - As the Council members may know, a recent court decision has resulted in the true test of an assessment has to he equal to the increase in fair market value. I did talk with Jack Maxwell, with Maxwell Realty, in order to determine what the increase in fair market value would be as a result of the improve- ment. One of the problems Mr. Maxwell incurred is that the property owned by Edgar Klucas is immediately west of the Meadows Subdivision. This becomes a problem since it appears that one way to develop the Edgar Klucas parcel is to extend Marvin Elwood Road so that it becomes parallel with west River Street (road that MSP Training Facility is on) and ultimately returns to Praire Road. To give you a better idea of the layout of Marvin Elwood Road, I have enclosed a copy of the Meadows Subdivision plot. If this road is ultimately developed in this fashion, the improvement we have put on went River street would actually not benefit the Edgar K.lucao parcel at all since service would quite likely come off the extension of Marvin Elwood Road. Portion of tho oroporty is on Green Acres - According to the Wright County Assessor's Office, all except 5 acres of Edgar Klucan's 19.54 acres is on Green Aerea and as a result, the improvement against the portion that is on Green Acres would be deferred automatically. In order to qualify for Green Acres, the land has to he agricultural fond and at least 1/3 of the family income of the owner must be de- rived from agricultural use or total production income including rental income must he $300 plus $10.00 per tillable acre. Ono Council Agenda - 1/25/82 additional problem is incurred because the assessment has never de- finitively determined what 5 acres is not on Green Acres and would be eligible for special assessments. Likelihood of appeal - It has become apparent to me that unless the assessment is going to be drastically reduced from the proposed figure of $$17,206.32 or be eliminated completely, an appeal would be likely. Obviously, this would be a lengthy and costly procedure to both parties. Ability of City to assess at a later date - As indicated above, there appears the possibility that the property may receive no particular benefit from the improvement because the property abutting west River Street could be served from the extension of Marvin Elwood Road. How- ever, there is also the likelihood that the property may develop with- out the extension of this road. In this case, the City does have the authority through its current ordinance to assess property that hooks up to a particular improvement and has not been previously assessed. One advantage to this system is that the hook up fee is equivalent to the assessment on a current cost basis, that is; cost or updated for inflation, etc. This was done, for example, in a lot that Quintin Lancers purchased that was previously considered unbuildable and not assessed. Another example would be the improvements on the 77-1 Project for water services to those houses that currently have wells. No assessment was made at the time and the cost would only be charged if there is actual hook up to the City's water system. One concern that is present when the City waives an assessment com- pletely is the precedent it might net. I feel the circumstances do warrant the waiving of, an asocament in light of the fact that there is an alternative route and oleo the size of the project in relation- ship to the particular improvement in question. As I indicated, the debt retirement fund for this project has sufficient funds in it to retire the debt without any monies being collected from this improve- ment. However, the City may have taken another view and may not even have served the area if a vast majority of the assessment income wore being derived frown this one parcel. POSSIBLE ACCIONt After the termination of the con- tinued hearing, consideration of a motion to adjust the assonaaent for Edgar Klucas parcel. REFERENCES, A copy of the Meadows Subdivision plot. - 2 - Council Agenda - 1125/82 2. Consideration of a Set Back variance - Shawn Mc Goff. PURPOSE: To consider a variance by Shawn McGoff„ owner of Lot 3 - Block 6 in the Meadows Subdivision, for a variance to build a five foot by 8 foot (5' by 8') foyer/entrance onto the front of his home. A set back of 25 feet is being proposed as opposed to the 30 feet that is required. Mr. MCGoff requested the variance in order to allow the foyer to be built. The reason for the addition of the foyer is to prevent heat loss which is now occurring through his front door. At the public hearing on this matter, there was one concern stated by Mel Wolters indicating that he would rather see a garage built and a side entry way built into the garage. However, Mr. McGoff indicated that this would not resolve his heat loss through the front door. After the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended the approval of the variance on a 3 to 0 vote with John Bondhus absent and Joyce Dowling, since it was her first meeting and not being familiar with the subject matter, abstaining. As a result, since this requires a 4/5's voto, the matter is brought forward to It the City Council. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approval of the variance (Regardless of what is done with the zoning ordinance provision to change this re- quirement, a 4/5's vote is still required for Monday night's meeting to over turn the decision of the Planning Commission which in effect was actually a denial because of lack of the 4/5's vote). - R Council Agenda - 1/25/82 3, Consideration of Amending Various Zoninq Ordinances. PURPOSE% During their past several meetings, the Planning Commission has reviewed the entire city zoning ordinances andhas recommended various changes as listed below. The proposed ordinance changes: Underlining indicates additions to exist- ing language, strike -oats indicate deletions from existing language. Section 10-3-1 (R): whenever a lawful non -conforming use of a structure or land is discontinued for a period of six (6) months, fol -lowing written noticu-from an -authorized agent of -the -City, any future use of said structure or land shall be made to conform with the provisions of this Ordinance. Reason: Often times a lawful, nonconforming use will be discontinued, but is not immediately brought to the attention of the City of Monticello. with this change proposed, such use cannot be continued after lapse of six (6) months regardless of whether a notice has been sent from the City or not. Section 10-3-2-(B)-2: Basements may be -used se -living quarters -or roams as-a- rortion or-residential-dweilinger Reason: According to the uniform building code, certain provisions have to bo adhered to before baseements can be used as living quarters. If this statement is not elaborated upon, a person might got the impression he can use his basement for living quarters regardless of what provisions are made. StTetien l,0-3-2-iP)-S-Br -Threo-pereent-of the +ervicv area -within an-off- �treet-par Ming -area shall he-landoeaped with -grass -and/or doeorativo-serfaeo- �reatment - treos and shrubbery for all, dove topmento-except singio-family dwellings. - Reason: This provision has not been enforced and would probably be unreason- able to incorporate into a parking lot a green aroq,in light of the weather conditiona in Minnesota with snow removable, - 4 - Council Agenda - 1/25/82 Section 10 -3 -2 -(F) -5-C: One percent of the development costs, or $1500, which- ever is greater, as determined by the building permit valuation, stall be de- voted to landscaping exclusive of seed or sod and walkways not completed at the, time -of the issuance -of the certificate af-Oecepaneyr A bond shall be reenl ired for1gn% of landscaoina not completed at the time of the issuance of the Ceritificate of Occupancy. This bond shall be for one year a period of time, not greater than one year, set forth by the suildinq Official, at the end of which the City has the authority to complete the necessary required landscaping. This provision does not apply to ningle and two family residences. Reason: A period of time of one year is greater than the City would normally allow since most of the provisions of this nature would be due to weather, and the landscaping could be completed within six to eight months. You will note also, that additional language was inserted since this was left out of the final copy of the ordinance previously. Section 10-1-3-(D) 2: Terraces, steps, uncovered porchesr stoops or similar features provided they do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal structure or to a distance less than two (2) tent from any lot lina. Iteasun: Since this section defines what types of items would not be encroach- ments on yard act backs, it is recommended that uncovered porches and atoopo be eliminated, since theso could be construed as a deck, for example. It is questionable whether you would want a deck to extend beyond the side yard set back. Section 10 -1 -5 -(D) -8-(A): Each parking apace shall he not less than nine (9) :eut wide and twenty (20) foot in length exclusive, of access aisles, and each apace shall be sorved adequately by access aisles. EXCEPTION- where desirod, nn to 25% of the parking spaces may be not less than seven and one- half (7i) foot in width and not lose than sixteen (161 feet in lenqth when served adequately by access aisles to aecnmmodate compact car parkinq, and should be marked as such. Izeason i In order to conserve space and make allowances for compact cars. Section 10-)-5-in)-8-(OL: Curb cut openings and driveways shall be at a minimum throe (1) foot from the side yard property lino in residential districts and five (5) foot from the side yard Int line in lausinens or induntrial districts. Reauon: To make it clear that d:'!veways, in addition to curb cut openings, nhall be a minimum of throo (3) foot from the aide yard property lino in residential districts and five (5) foot from the side yard lot lino in busi- noes or industrial districto. - 5 - Council Agenda - 1/25/82 Section 10-3-5-(F)-4: The boulevard portion of the street right-of-way shall not he used for parking. Reason: To correct a typographical error on the original ordinance. Section 10-3-5-00-18: RETAIL STORE. AND SERVICE BUSINESS WITH FIFTY (50) PERCCNT OR MORE GROSS FLOOR AREA DEVOTED TO STORAGE, WAREHOUSES Al:D/OR INDUSTRY: The number of spaces shall be required by either option 01 or, option 02. option 01: At least eight (8) spaces, or one (1) space for each two hundred (200) square feet devoted to public sales or service plus one (1) space for each 500 square feet of storage area. Option 02: A:. least eight (8) spaces or one space for each employee on the maximum shift. Reason: The current language is confusing and there is some question which method would be appropriate. By indicating the greater of the following two methods, eliminates the ambiguity in tho current ordinance. section 1n -3-9-(8)-1-(d): Political Campaign Signs: Shall not exceed foer-(4)-aquare feet -in all aRa coning -df strictsT or twelve (12) square feet in all ether zoning districts. Every campaign sign must contain the name and address of persons responsible for such sign, and that per- son shall be responsible for its removal. Signs erected before-tho-pri- mary-eleetion shill remain in place for no longer than five (5) days after the general ar-special election for which they are intended. All signs shall be confined to private property. The City shall have the right to remove and destroy unsightly signs or remove signs after the five (5) day limit and aesoas a fee of five dollars 5.00 per sign for removal. Reason: The first sentence was changed to allow the same sire sign in a roui- dential district as all other zoning districts since four (4) square foot is fairly onall. The third sentence was clanged in order that the ordinance mai read easier. Section 30 -3 -9 -(D) -2(k): Overhanginu signs. Reason: Over hanging signs aro no longer allowed and this is in conjunction with the next proposed ordinance amendment. - 6 - Council Agenda - 1/25/82 Section 10-3-9-(C)-5: Overhanging signs will -be allowed to-projeet- over-public right-of-ways in -the -Village -of Monticello -until -December 317 19x67 which is -the -cat -off -date after which no -overhanging -signs -will be- rermitedT The Change: Delete this section and renumber Sections 6 thru 10 that follow. �C' Section 10-3-9-(0)-2: Atl::UAI._SIGbt ILAUGERS-Li CHOSES.- All eign-lungers- engaying-in the business -of erecting. -construeting,-enlarging? altera- tienT repair -r moving,-remeving,-demelishingT er-equ4pring-a-sign shall i-Q-reyroired to -be 4ieensed-annually.- Pees -for -sign hangers license shall be -provided in-the-Mentiealle eity-Ordinance- Beason: not necessary. Section 10-5-4-(C)-3: The provisions of Section 10-22-1 45► (t) of thio Ordinance aro considered and satisfactorily met. — Beason: To correct a typographical error in the original ordinanco. Section 30-22-1-(A)i Roquoat for amendments or conditional use permits, as provided within this Ordinanco, shall ha filed with the Zoning Adminis- tration on an official application form. Such application shall be accom- panied by a foo as outlined in Chapter 25. This fee shall not be refunded. Such application shall also be accompanied by ten-41e)-cepios of detailed written and graphic materials fully explaining the proposed change, develop- ment, or use. The Zoning Administrator shall refer said application, along with all related information to the City Planning Commission for considera- tion and a roport and raeommendation to the City Council. Beason: Sometimes it is not necessary to have ten (10) copies of everything, and tlio following would still allow for the provisions where more eopiou would be neeasnary. ;action 10-22-1-(C): Vhe applicant er-a-representative thereof shall appear-lwfore the Planning-Cammieoion inronler-te &newer -ciao etions-enneorn- inp the prepeoed-amendment-or eonditional "Be. Roason: often times the applicant cannot bo prosent or have a representative prusent. - 7 - Council Agenda - 1/25/82 Section 10-22-1-(D): The amendment or conditional use application shall be referred to the City staff for a report and recommendation to be presented to the Commission. A preliminary draft of the City staff's report and recommendations shall be given to the City Planning Commission at least ten 419� three (3) days prior to the meeting at which said report and recom- mendations are to be presented. The final report and recommendations to the City staff is to be entered in and made part of the permanent written record of the Planning Commission meeting. Reason: This provision is not currently being adhered to and if it were, people would sometimes have to wait five to six weeks to be on the Planning Commission agenda because of the time frame indicated above. SocLiun 10-22-1-(C) The Planning -Commission City Staff shall sct a date for a public hearing. Notice of such hearing shall be published in con- formance with the State Law and individual notices, if it is a district change or conditional use permit request, shall he mailed not hiss than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the hearing to all owners of property according to the Wright County assoosment records, with- in three hundred fifty (350) feet of the parcel included in the request. Reason: In order to expedite hearings, the city staff sets the hearings for / the Planning Commission rather than to wait for a Planning Commiusion to have \- a meeting, sot a hearing, and then consider the matter at the next meeting. Section 10 -2n -2-(N): the Boning-Adminialrater-shall-notify the applicant nf-the-CauncilLs-decision-in writing.- _—Roauon: Thin is unnecessary. Section 10-22-3-(D)t PERFORMAIGE-BGNBi- L.- Exeeyt-in the ease. -of, won-in- nowe-producing-ronLdential-propopty,-upon approval-ot a eoaditionaL use peFmi,t-tha-Ctty shall he-pvowided with-a-avrsty Londv each-eccr'nw,-corti- finaLo-of, deposit,-socwrttieo,-or each-deponLt-peior-to the Issuing eC l.uilding-permits-op Lnttiatien-09 work -on the preposod-impcovemeute or dove l•opnent.- Enid-socwrLty ahv1L guaranteo eoaformances-0nd-cemplLaace .iah-the-conditiena of-tho-conditional-uso-pormit and the codes of -t Lo -City. B Council Agenda - 1/25/82 Section 10-22-3-(D) continued: a.- Whe aceuriay-shall-be in -the -amount of the eity-Engineer's or -City building-SnspeeterLs-estimated-costs-of labor and materials for the proposed -improverenta or -development, -Said project can be -handled -in steges -upon the discretion -of the city -Engineer and Building-Inspeetery -3v -The-City shall hold -the -security until eompletien of -the -proposed improvements -or development end a certificate of -occupancy indicating-campliance with -the tenditionsI-use-permit and ordinances -of the city -has-been issued -by the eity-building lnapector.- 4.- Pailure to eomply-with the conditions -of the conditional use permit -and/or the or- dinances -of the eity-ohall-result in-ferEeiture ef-the-security. Reason: Unnecessary, impractical, and would cause a hardship on the applicant. Section 10-23-8: PCRFeRNANCb SONDv -(a)— except -in the case -of non-4n- como-producing-residential-property open -approval of -a -variance or -appeal, the eity-shall-be provided -with a surety -bond, -cash eserowT certificate of deposit, -securities or -cash deposit prior to -the -issuing -of building -per- mits -or initiation -of work -on the prepooed-improvements or -development! Said seeurity-shad -guarantee -conformance -and -camp I iance with-the-cenditiens of -the -variance or-appeat and the ordinances -of the eityr fn)- relic aeeurity-ahall-be in-tho-amount of-lv5-t4mes-the-City engineer`s- or-nniiding Inspector's estimated cost -of tabor ens materials for the pro- posed imrrovements-or develorment. JC} -The-City shall hold-tho-necarity until eompictien-of the proposed -im- provements -or dovotopment and a certificate of-oecnpaney-indicating eom- pliance wish -the -variance or-appeat and ardinanceo-of the eityrhas-been issued -by the eity-Doitding lnapector. JW -Fniluro-to eompty-vith the -conditions of -the -variance or-appent and the ordinances -of the eity-ohaii-reealt in-ferfeieure of-tho-aeeurity. Reason: Same as with previous performance bond requirements for conditional uae should not be neconeary for variances either. - 9 - Council Agenda - 1/25/82 Section 10-23-8: RECONSIDERATION: Whenever an application for a variance has been considered and denied by the Planning Commission or City Council, a similar application for a variance affecting substantially the same Property shall not be considered again by the Planning Commission or the City Council for at least six months from the date of its denial: And a subsequent application affecting substantially the same property shall like wise not be considered again by the Planning Commission or City Council for an additional six months from the date of the second denial unless the de- cision to reconsider such a matter is made by the Planning Commission. If such a request is denied by the Planning Comminsion, the applicant may anpeal this decision to the City Council. Reason: This same language applies to conditional use permits and no similar language is in the variance section. This would prevent a variance from being reconsidered on a constant basis if requested by the applicant. Section 10-24-1: ISSUANCE: No building or structure hereafter erected or moved, or that portion or of an existing structure or building erected or moved shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any putpus: what- so.:ver until a certificate of occupancy shall have been issued by the Building Official stating that the building or structure complies with all of the provisions of thin Ordinance.. ]zcason: To correct a typographical error in originnl Ordinance. Section 10-24-2: APPLICATION: Said certificate shall be applied for coincident with the application for a building permit, conditional use permit, and/or variance and shall be issued within -ten -(k01 days after the Building Official shall have found the Wilding or structure satis- factory and given final inspection. Said Application nhall be accompanied by a fee as outlined in Section 10-25-4. Reason: Once the final inspection has been given, a certificate of occupancy In granted immediately. SActlon 10-24-3: REQUIREMENTt Construction performed pursuant to the provisions of the ordinancoo establishing and regulating Building Codes of the City of Montieollo shall not be subte sub ect to the requirement of a Certifieata of Occupancy established by this Ordinanco. Roason: To correct typographical error. - 10 - Council Agenda - 1/25/82 Chapters 26 S 27 of Title 10 should be reversed. Reason; Chapter 27 was for the wild and Scenic Act which was actually added after the original ordinance, however the section on enforcement and penalties, Chapter 26, should actually be last and should be designated as Chapter 27. Section 10-22-5-(M): Approval -of a request &halt require passage by -a foar-fifth-(4/5)-vote of -the -fall eity esencit. Reason: A requirement of a simple majority,as you can see by the enclosed article from the League of Minnesota Cities June 1481 magazine, it could 1x questioned as to its validity. Additionally, as you aro well aware, this has frequently became a problem when some of the members of the Plan- ninj Commission or City Council are not present. If there are only four members present, then it requires a vote of 100% of the people present for approval and when there are leas than four members present, there is no way that the item could be approved. Section 10-22-3-(e): RECONSIDERATION: whenever an application for a conditional use permit has been considered and denied by tho City Council, a similar application for a conditional use permit affecting substantially the some property shall not be considered again by the Planning Commission or City Council for at least six (6) months from the date of its denial: and a subsequent application affecting substantially the Game property shall likewise not be considered again by the Planning Coneianion or City Council for an additional six (6) months from the date of the second dvnial unless a decision to reconsider such matter in made by not test: ehan-tcur-fifths-(4/5)-vote of-tho-felt City Council. Reason: Same as previous proposed amendment. %.-tion }0-23-6-iP}t- A rarianee-of this-Zening etAinance or -grant -of en- epreel-nhatl-be for foar-fifths 44/5+s► vote -of the full-Ptanninq Sum - mission serving as-tho-neard-of Adjustment -and -Arpeater -ShonlA there be- i—o-tham four -(4) -Planning eomm*ueion-Members-rrescnt-at any meeting, rhe applicant may havo-the-matter brought directly -to the eity-Council mr-love the hearing eontineed at-a-Ptann4ng eonaninsion-meeting-at-a inter date. Reasons Same reason as in the two provious ordinance amendments proposed. Council Agenda - 1/25/82 Section 10-23-6-(K): h grant of -an appeal-regaires a foer-fifths 44/5+s► vote -of the futi-city eoeneii to -reverse -the -decision of-the-Pianninq eommi s e i ors Reason: Same reason as the previous three ordinance amendments proposed. Section 2-1-2: ORGANIZATION: MEETINGS: The Commission shall elect a chairman from among its members for a term of one year and the Com- mission may create and fill such other offices as it may determine. The Planning Commission shall hold at least one (1) regular meeting each month. This meeting shall be held on the third second Tuesday. Regular meetings shall commence at seven thirty o'clock (7:30) p.m. Hearings shall be heard ot-savrn-ferry-fiva s'aleck 47.'=)-:•+m+,..os as soon there- after as possible. The Planninq Commission shall adopt rules for the transaction of business and shall keep a record of its resolutions, trans- actions and findings, which record shall be a public record. Reason: Eliminate reference to holding at least one regular meeting each month and having the hearing set for 7:45 P.M. There may be times when it is not necessary to have a regular meeting each month and additionally, ( hearings aro held starting at 7:30. Suction 70 -1 -9 -1E1 -2-(b)-(1) Currently reads; Option A. Under Option A, only .all signs shall be allowed. The maximum numbut of signs on any principal Wilding shall be six signs (four product identification signs and two premise identification signs), with only two walls allowed for the display of the signs. Each wall shall contain no more than two product identification signs and onu premise identification sign. The total maximum size of wall signs shall M. <tnt.rmined by taking twenty percent (20%) of the gross silhouette area of the front of the building, up to three hundred (300) square feat, whichever is lens. It' a principal building is on a corner lot, the largest side of the building may he used to determine the gross silhouette area. -t;+,s ,..0f. icor purposes of determining the grossarca of the silhouette of the principal building, the silhouette shall be defined as that area within an outline drawing of the principal building as viewed from the front lot line or from thsc related public street (s). Rcacon: To clarify what aide is used for building on a corner lot. Council Agenda - 1/25/82 Entire Section 10-20 Planned knit Development - 1 think this entire section is too lengthy (18 pages) and too hard to understand. I have enclosed a sample ordinance suggested by the League of Minnesota Cities that would cover approximately four (4) pages if it were typed up in our zoning ordinance book. It should be pointed out that the League of Minnesota Cities has suggested both a more lengthy Planned Unit Development ordin- ance and a shorter ordinance, and this particular ordinance is actually the more lengthy or detailed ordinance on Planned Unit Development, and the shorter one would probably only cover about two (2) pages. I think the version that I have enclosed suggested by the League of Minnesota Cities covers the major portions of what is intended to be covered by the more lengthy version that the City of Monticello has adopted. There may be some areas where we have to tailor-make planned unit development to fit the needs of the City of Monticello, but in my estimation, the version enclosed by the League of Cities is preferable. Article 5. Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) Ordinance provisions for planned unit dc• velopm^nts vary widely -n hoth thea scope and substance. Joitte:app.ty only to refiderP (jal1develo�menti'OtAell periNt a mi■tud toi-comme1174Ctlifd,baiutrial rises wrlfiievl:e Ident6l`tAJ1.1l few ordinances provide for planned industtial districts distinct from planned unit residential doclopments.(Thd (On�;j0mT�rdltian"ee Caiiiini typical orfs• nance provjik t:brrl'UDIwhich'tnay blend applpptlat�D't5liNerilil acid industrial uses vgilWrWdeMtalejjhc short form provisions are bnefer, leaving much to be spelled out in ad ministration of the piovicons by plan• nrng commission or council ;ulcs Small communities wilt no large tracts undevel- oped and no immediate pruspccls of large annexations or substantial redevclupntcnt may wish toontii such prousions altogether. Since the planned unit develUpment con• cept invokes both subdrsision control and Yoning, it is desirable that there be appio• priate tie-ins between the two. Any use of different administering agencies for the two males it more difficult to provide for an orderly system of PUN adm;nisteied to achieve sound planning oblectises. (APr .vas •,t.• Je44t rAUjj6L y r4i♦ J"" Arfj t'1 Council Agenda - 1/25/82 Section 10-3-4-(G)-1: One and/or two family dwellings and townhouses: the minimum floor area for such type buildings shall be as follows: one Story Dwelling - 960 Square Feet Two Story Dwelling - 750 Square Feet. EXCEPTION: 1. The minimum square footage of a one story buildinq may be reduced to 864 square feet if a garaqe is added with at least 336 square feet. In no case, however, shall the minimum dimension of that garaqe be less than 14 feet Reason: Initially prompted from a letter from the Farmers Hone Ad- ministration requesting that Monticello possibly consider amending the ordinance to allow for homes of less than 1,000 square feet that are one story. Because of economic conditions, it is often difficult for first time home buyers to obtain a mortgage for homes as large as 1,000 square feet plus there are savings in energy cost, etc. Farmers Home Administration guidelines for a small family do not allow a rambler to be in excess of 864 square feet without approval by the district director. In their public hearings and deliberations on these proposed ordinance amendments, there was no input in support or objections for the vari- ance changes except for the change in minimum square footage for a one story dwelling. Ralph Munsterteiger and Mel Wolters both encouraged the City of Monticello to consider reducing the floor area requirements similar to the one proposed by the Planning Commission. It should be noted that the Planning Commission recommends reducingthe floor area to 960 square feet regardless if a marane is provided and allow a home_ to he 864 uquare feet to 960 square feet if a garage of at least 336 aquare feet was provided. It was felt that by adding this provision, it would at least provide the home owner with an alternative to outside storage which may he more objectionable from a neighbor's view point than the size of a house. In aurveying 12 communities that reaponded to a questionnaire, five had minimum square, footage requirements. The other cities only had minimum square footage requirements as contained within the Uniform Building Codo. Some alternatives to merely reducing the size requirements of a one story hems would be creating a special residential zoning district in which homes of this size would he allowed. The reason for this would be to allow that zoning district for new subdivision and would make everybody aware who has bought a lot in the new subdivision that the possibility exists of smaller homes of this nice. It was felt that some of the concerns that may be expressed by citizens if a smaller home is built, is that the home may not be compatible with the existing homes, however, a disadvantage to this, as come of you know, would be that all ouch ciao homes would be clustered in ono area. An another alternative, ono possibility would be to allow a smaller site home on a scattered basic ouch as two to a block or some othor basis. This would have the advantage of scattering the smaller size hanoo but may have an additional problem as to allowing such a home in a huilt up area. Possibly a combination of both the alternatives - 20 - C Council Agenda - 1125/82 just mentioned would be preferable to some, that is; allowing these size homes only in new subdivisions that are rezoned to different classifi- cations, and then only on a certain percentage of the lots, for example. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of adoption of the zoning ordinance amendments. 21 Council Agenda - 1/25/82 4. Consideration of a Resolution Adoptinq the Economic Development Plan and resignation of Chamber of Commerce nusiness & Industrial Development as Aevisory to the City Council. PURPOSE: The Minnesota Star Cities Program has been developed by the Department of Economic Development to help communities through- out the State of Minnesota to prepare for and achieve desired economic growth. Two of the elements of the Star Cities Program are the adoption of an economic development plan and the designation of a committee to be an advisory to the City Council on economic development matters. In order to give the City Council a broader scope of what the entire Minnesota Star Cities Program is about, I have enclosed the following: - An explanation of the Star Cities Program prepared by the Department of Economic Development. - Monticello's Star Cities Program. Monticello's Star Cities Program was prepared by the Chamber of Com- merce Committee on Business and Industrial nevelopment. Specific requirements of the Star City Program are noted in the table of contents. The two elements indicated above, the designation of the Chamber of Commerce Committee as advisory to the City Council and the adoption of an Economic Development Plan are included in Tabs 8 and E, respectively. Enclosed, please find a resolution adopting the Economic Development Plan and the designation of the Chamber of Commerce Business & Indus- trial Development Committee as advisory to the City Council. Once this step is completed, a preliminary presentation and final presen- tation will be made as indicated in Tab L. If the final steps are completed, Monticello will he one of the first communities in the State to complete the entire Minnesota Star Cities Program. PORSIRi.E ACTION, Consideration of a motion to approve the resolution adopting the Economic Development Plan and designation of the Chamber of Commerce Business & Industrial Development Committee as advisory to the City Council. RrVERFN=-iSt A copy of the proposed resolution, explanation of the Minnesota Star Cities Program by the nepartment of Economic Develop- ment, and Monticello's own Minnesota Star Cities Program. -22- Council Agenda - 1/25/82 5. Consideration of Approval of Chanqe Order #22 with the Paul A. Laurence Company on the wastewater Treatment Plant Construction Contract. PURPOSE.: To consider change order 022 with the Paul A. Laurence Company for an additional $958 for the following: Addition of a 25 foot by 9 foot concrete slab on grade at the sludge vehicle garage. This slab is required as pro- tection against bituminous deterioration caused by spills at the fuel fill station. At our last meeting, the City Council tabled approval of this change order because the price appeared relatively high. Enclosed, please find a cover letter from John Simola along with the related materials, some of which were sent out with our last meeting. As you can see by the work sheet prepared by Jerry Corrick, with OSM, an estimated cost going through each item on an item by item basis would be $854 and Paleo's cost was $958. It was felt that in light of the lengthy cost to resubmit this request, the approval of the change order of $958 was not out of line. POSSIKY, ACTION, coil sj,Ieration of approval of change order 022 for an additional $958 as indicated above. REFERENCE.Si A copy of related materials relative to the change order. - 23 - C Council Agenda - 1/25/82 6. Approval of Final Construction Payment to LaTour Construction and Chanqe Order 02 on the 1981-1 and 1981-2 Improvement Project. PURPOSE: To consider final payment to LaTour Construction Company on the 1901-1 and 1981-2 Improvement Project. This project included improvements of storm sewer on Cedar Street from the railroad tracks to Lauring Lane and also improvements consisting of sanitary sewer, water.,and bituminous surfacing to the area of the Meadows Subdivision and the new NSP Training Facility. Additionally, a change order in the amount of $3,173.50 is being requested for lowering various water surfaces, water main hydrants and a culvert at the intersection of River Street with County Road 75 required by the County Engineer. Details of this change order are enclosed. with the change order, the total cost of this project is $338,538.83 and the original contract amount was $358,601.60. As you may know, final amount is determined on the actual quantities used, where the original contract amount is based on estimated quantities. In ad- dition to this, there was a previous change order reduction of l/ $9,310. At this time, our engineer is recommending final payment on this payment and the final figure on the change order is still being negotiated but a firm figure should be available at Monday night's meeting. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approval of final payment to LaTour Construction Company and change order 42. REFERENCES, copies of materials relating to change order 02. - 24 - THE MEADOWS i , da •' 177 7•'•�J'• F� ."' ,,1\ i 1 r•� =•y. � !�, ~ I�-, •, \_ wr fi ti:.: 1. j' T ': O : irk ( i .�, J, �'� iI, �1 j �•1, �, �I�1'�''1:4~'� �i I/ r I'r � ,• � L���i _ .�^;.c. 'lii� „ iyy ���: '"1 ',�'t �J -�+ /t .W,tn O)r 1.�r' _Q �qr t i fO 10 1, b �.� .. (, x _•+•.p 1' w•f•'� .O' � k'S.' \4 41 �. 1� ��`a{� ',�rrrq w•r i ,�\ w r1iO. Y. • ;..'u. e1a ° �r ,-_ !`i'.° nlp •'0�/J',/r. {� - /fP 11 �j r•_W� P.� ri. ! Dj/''�\a.� �' �•rl =A•��. +of �..,, .';fir ... - .: . ��'S����•'�6 i,, .Ilr •-',(� 1r' _.. �_ .;�i....r- it N lb At (.. )Ir 6• y'�. iJ• � 'li t, 1 'ti _ �,.i Y.y t1• '4•� i I(• ?' �; ,e h v yt 1 y tau i� • 6,14' r.: : . . .. 9o -a' �ailnr ° �i �.c. 3° — •':�° ..w u: .r 1 �Y. t N tD r 4 A t tIT � � b A It (• n I. • 1 ' ! � � 91� i � � r ° f ° � f1 , t. t °+ +'�{ � : p 'i 7 `1 1 » » �•_I� nr wlr „1� ,. °� • . AAAA . .. _ °•'V a I��,• – o a .RAIRIt .� , • • ..tK'6ZJ•r WI,!' , - ROAD .`• J1 , tV AM•w Al>•'. ® , nYw11r ... AAAA• .. l WHAT -IS THE MINNESOTA STAR CITIES PROGRAM? The Minnesota Star Cities Program is a tool to encourage well planned economic development. Through a "self help" process, the program will attempt to provide an avenue for communities to organize, establish goals and complete projects while encouraging interaction between public officials and local citizens. Minnesota communities make a wide range of decisions which directly affect the workings of the economic system. Strengthening the commmunities'economic base and making maximum use of economic re- sources should be concerns which receive the utmost attention of the community. The ability of the community to use development resources to promote economic growth is not an inherited trait. However, with professional assistance it is an activity which can be learned and directed at providing a high quality living environment for its citizens. The Minnesota Department of Economic Development is pleased to present the Star Cities Program. The program is designed to help communities throughout the State of Minnesota prepare for and achieve desired economic growth. The combination of elements contained in the program have proven to be effective methods for enhancing the communities' chances to achieve desired growth through economic development. The program will serve to give special recognition to communities who undertake and develop d strategy, to effectively deal with their. futures. Many elements of the Star Cities Program can be met by ongoing civic and community activities. Assistance in meeting the program require- ments will be made available from the Business and Community Contact Division of the Minnesota Department of Economic Development. An Economic Development Consultant will be assigned to your community to maintain contact and provide assistance when needed. RESOLUTION J ADOPTING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGNATION OF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL DEVEWPMENT COMMITTEE AS ADVISORY TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is interested in encouraging well planned economic development; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Economic Development has initiated the Star Cities Program to help communities prepare for and achieve economic growth; and WHEREAS, the Star Cities Program requires an Economic Development Plan to be adopted by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Star Cities Program requires the City Council to designate an advisory organization for economic development; and WHEREAS, the Chamber of Commne:^e Committee has been actively involved with economic devolopment; and NOW TIIEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota 1 as follows: J 1. To adopt the Economic Development Plan presented to the City Council on by the Chamber of Commerce Business and Industrial Development Committee. 2. To designate the Chamber of Commerce Business and Industrial Development Committee to be advisory to the City Council on economic development matters. Motion to adopt resolution was made by Council member seconded by Voting in favor, Opposed, WIIEREUPON SAID RESOLUTION WAS DECLARED DULY PASSED A14D ADOPTED THIS 25th day of January, 1982. Arve A. Grimrmo, Mayor ATTEST: Gary Wisher, City Administrator J Enclosed with the supplement is a breakdown of cost change order #22 for the wastewater Treatment Plant. Palco's original request was $1,113.00 with the approved request by Orr-Schelen-Mayeron of $958.00. Although this cost is $104 above Jerry Corrick's estimate, this difference is normally picked up later on rather than go through the lengthy cost of resubmittal. (Estimate 8 man hours for those people involved). V a 8 s ,I 5y 3I o o do � 0 ORA-SCHEIEM'• MAYEF00 ASSOCIATES INC, U ° ConsuN,ing Engineers o • 1—� t 8 •i � oat. t''`{ OP r4jOJTICi:t.L9 '.•':W•TP Iry • _.. >_so C—A, ' SZOADWAi P.O. �o7t '717 Ni. riii czu-P , M ru SS316L LOUtion. Aoian (,eu•O ,. P Pit• Ag-SOK-) SMOLIt :hg;naer GE -RAL I1 S• G01ZOC-IL Lcr.Ucmer ..ora .,- •:g you Attached Separately _ By Messenger the following itemr: O 7•' , 0 Specilications O Change Order O Inspection Report C P. is D Prel. Reports O Contracts O Memorandum NC. SHOP DRAWING DESCRIPTION f 11., '•UMBER COST INf ?—fdAT70 J 12&LATIvE TO C�IA>aG>� OQ0 4m, n Th: nee ;tnsm,;ted as,d+eched: ;.'—pil�q. T, •� ❑'Tote Markings XFor Your Use o ° r _I rtes .Ic+ 0 '.cmmentt Atucbad O As Requested C' n n I lesubmit O Rsvlew and Comment 0 -For Signatures +0 via+ C-itlian441 volt 1^.0 Cf� 16AOauta 0th ORA•SCMELIRMAraaORAASSOCIAft;IML 2021 fast J4enrn ni•: -3- ••ul► • Su%I. 236 •N'n"eige,Nt• W-Aerul. X510 r 2/?J' 4S: I c > , '4t 2 2 — r✓10.�� wkJl7° — �,e�n rti/ Vic a4P �2'' O.c e•u1. I�a$Qiyr1.25'x9' x o.T' _ 4.Ib �ydS r•lo = g.s$ dd3 a, -a. 27 t 10. L -ml -b 4.57E x J 4$/6--d ?20 Ab��s;.�-l';,,•sti - .2s',•�' x �o.zS�JF - �' s� (2S r9) 2 x 0.5 x 3.00/s.F. = 54 / (L��,� 3- . 4 „JO.4 f ItCv - z(25•',)' t?IOILf • ��D I .F 'F•.G..� t r4�Cp...�t 7a(e It 25 x U.5' - 212•S' �2 105” -(0'' 9 c 2•1.5"' = 2'10.5 i 2 433' x • 6r.3-�A Z 89� 2 �•ja 9102/ T >t I•t).firx .I'/I i LCoi 44,/ IOT J�� ,Iov.k,",L leu rlOfr-.� ?[e. �'•) 25' x 9,, : 5 4•I(o yc1' �5,o n� - 4 175 a G2 OP ?54 J J. '5 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER ,.nre legnal a 1 us ewntaen .. (-. . OIIN'SC 0.14 w .1004 N ASSOCIATES, INC, prm10.. a uDOf co.sultawTs. 1"G 071 Mal ,enelrA arl wane l>t Y1Mwla.txa.Of 0417 ala sdlei` t.y, eeoM / " tractor Paul A. Laurence Co, Cheng* Order No. 22 ._,erne P.O. Box 1267 — 10000 HMrSr. 55 west Fila efodi+. 14. 50 Minneapolis, Minnesota Project ND.068-2748.01 Job Locat Ion Monticello, Minnesota EPA Grant No. C270855-03 In «cordance elth the terms of your contract dated November 20 1980 .1th City of Monticello Chow for WWTP Upgrading 6 Appurtenant Work 1, are hereby raQuosted to cmply .Ith the following changes fron the contract Piens and specifications: 79scrlptlon and Justification: - Refer to Fleld Modif / 50 (Attached) Addition of 25' - 0" x 9' - 0" Concrete slab on grade at Sludge Vehicle Garage. Thi s slab is required as protection against bituminous deterioration caused by spills @ the fuel fill station, iree►do.n of costs this Change Order: ,{ x EgulPsnt Prof if E Orsrhead Total Add 101e1 Dequct (Material) S 418.00 9 t�s_nn e urawni of Original Contract: l 4.704-000.00 Tofel Controct ;ontrect Thru C.O. / 21 Total Addition Total Oaduci Thr This C.O. /11 S 4,770,559.07 IS 958.00 IS 4.771.St7_n7 Irlglnel Contingencies 171) $141.200.00 Not Panalning ;ont. Thru C.O. 12 1 Add This C.O. Deduct This C.O. Cont ingenc les $74,640.1 1S 958.00 571,682. .Tore .1I 1 be on e+nenilion of 0 days for compiet fon, the del• of the couplet Ion of ConVact eas Octo _gr_28, 10_U and nos .111 bs QCtOber 28 , 19-02—. 4cepled by Date Signed Contractor /( . nded by Date Signed ,Lpro.ed by Dole Signed Oener 15 Paul A. Laurence Company GENERAL CONTRACTORS V.O. Bo. 1267 10.000 Nrph.ey 55 west Minneepohs. MN 55440 Telephone 612/546.6911 TLX 290770 December 10, 1981 Orr-Schelen-Mayercn 6 Asscc.,Inc. 2021 Fast Hennepin Avenue, Suite 4238 Minneapolis, MJ 55413 Attn: Mr. Gerald Corrick Re: Wastewater Weatmjit Upgrading and Appurtenant Work, Monticello, Minnesota FPA Project No. C270855-03 Change Order Request No. 23 RECFiVe COMM. M ■ 7UQ'01J DEC 141981 Gentlanen: Per Field Modification No. 50, dated August 28, 1981 in vd-dah a 25'-0" by 9'-0" concrete slab was added at the Sludge vehicle Garage, we aubnit the following price: Material..................................$415.00 Labor.....................................$418.00 Overhead 6 Profit 158 ................... .$125.00 70TAL.....................................5:58.00 Please issue a Chazx3e Cider for the above amount as soon as possible. Sincerely yours, PAUL. A� :,. LAIC CX7�ArD IGrurtOtner (LJiI�/1,..., Project Estimator JG:lf oc: PALDO - Monticello, MN Paul o1 C J GFOvCompany 6 Sons ai; OeW A leurenG GOTpeny :4 an epu "4 ernptOYer J J. M Paul A. Laurence Company GENERAL CONTRACTORS PA Ba. 1267 f 10.000 MrOhwti 55 Well < Minne•POIM. MN 55440 T2Wne 612t5e6.69r1 \\ t TLX290770 VV Deceanber 7, 1981 or-Schelen-Mayezon 6 Assoc.,Ync. 2021 Fast Hennepin Ave., Suite 238 RECEIVED MR-3ChU-iMMYEA01y 8 �. `°M� L of ., _ �zX� Quo 1981 r � Minneapolis, M 55413 Attn: Mr. Gerald Carrick RE: Wastewater 77eatrent Upgrading and Appurtenant Work, Monticello, Minnesota FPA Project No. G270855-03 Change oder Request No.23 Gentlaren: Per Field Modification No. 50, dated August 28, 1981 in which a 25'-0" x 10' - 6" concrete slab raas added at the Sludge Vehicle Garage, we mihrdt the following price: Material ........................$495.00 Labor ......... .. ..............$473.00 Overhead & Profit 158...........$145.00 Total ........................... $1,L-53.00 Please issue a Change mer for the above amount as noon as possible. Sincerely yours, tnex Project Estimator JG:lf Ubvoreh O} 6 1. tirP.eU ♦ $One GdnPenY �ry, Peal A L•urenu COMPenY a en •puel OPPOnunUY emMOYer - �. ORR SCHMN • MAYERON b ASSOCIATES. INC. -isulting Engineers Division of Kidde Consultants, Inc. ,nd Surveyors August 28, 1961 Paul A Laurence Co. P.O. Box 1267 10000 Highway 55 west Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Attn: Jerry Grundtner Re: Monticello wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading a Appurtenant Work EPA Project No. 0270855-03 Field Modification 1 50 Gentlemen: Upon review of final shop drawings for the sludge vehicles, it has become apparent that the turning radius required for these vehicles makes the driveway in front of the garages inadequate for maneuver in and out of the garages. Therefore, the driveway is increased in size approximately 14' by 87 '. One catch basin must be moved approximately 8' to the south and grade contour 910 should be revised as shown on attached revision drawing 4(r)3. Provide a 25' x 9' concrete slab on grade for the fuel fill sta- tion as detailed on attached revision drawing 4(r)4. All roadway and storm drain work shall be installed in accordance with Specification Section 0260. All concrete work shall con- form to Specification Division 3. This field modification will require additional quantities of ag- gregate base, biturtinous wearing course, tack coat, and concrete curb and gutter. Please note the storm drain quantities are not revised. Upon completion of all work related to Part V1I of the Bid Proposal, a balancing change order will be processed to re- flect the quantity revisions. At this time, please submit a 20?1 fast Mennep;n Avenue • Suite ?38 • Minneapolis, Minnesota 5$,13 612.331.86E TELEX: 29.0948 August 28,1981 Page 2 (- change order request for work related only -to the concrete slab addition at the fill station. Please note that the raised con- crete islands, guard posts and pump will be provided by others (City of Monticello). C Sincerely, ORR-SCRELEN-MAYERON 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. C.� J - "� "4 Gerald S. Corrick, P.E. Project Manager cct John Simola, City of Monticello Dick Reeling, OSM Field Office John P. Badalich, OSM GSC/gm 4 • •.9 TiO'+ y2'4,t.v X STonA, 9aA .► t • (.9J,9 1 Pot T. X PA4 IQ 6 LWC UP CYIST•R•1CR 'µ+S 1D QjWA N egtkC WITH 7.r K 5"q "r.9 .♦ Ce�.w4 SE CT. 1 tv At h we SCAam o k istp. caul. A9QaM i � � p.DO �iTJMuJdll �, ZaLocrito MAItJTtJJWCI + GARA Ze ao_ 25. iO. toy N 6iA0i iY SLJOGE Ve►tICLE i TOO' P RL.ga1.T 'SGL TRWG A r u iL CPA -)OA Till I ' CoNTVJx co�JtTR3cRIo�J At frown/ ; / I I NOQT*t �— PRJPG¢T'i .L.I+JL' PA ZT 1 A. L S1TE PLAN o° I' • Soto* ti w• !t 0+9•Iq title C~ use ..5.0. ORR WHKL N blAYWROv jLIRL4 MoDIFICATIOIJ 450 '2145.0. All ADO10Ctw7Eilt+tC ^04T1C�ua 09119 66n166.�� 14n4�ro� ..un+�r .Wr*1b1&WATt2 TCLATMWT TLAAIT aM.I 4 D•41.81 M ••"• L/�i`i 6 "0014..., .+•. «' a "" 9,.606. ...,...... a fM PRo?�cT No t 1�p BfiC •as (C) s t-114MD !If OtANA-f AT e*4* SS msiET, APRON �� SII ¢ELOC-A TC Q see or+d.M•I MAIn1TENAIJCE C-ARAGE RAISED coucefTe r35=oma w SSLAyO GUARD _ ftS.Tf a �wm P 10 o' 1 �I �'o STAT I ON A'1 -GN0 FU6� oi�. PiP� •�i 1 c�•ii I uP TMQJ SL.A"1 -0471, V� 25'• Io i . Co�� coNc. SLAM _S Ly OM GRADE VEH I G L E �.. CARACGC p,ITUMIIJOUs vajINU LIST. A,PQ oN k---, ltllcoz$ UNE PLAN OF SLAh OW GrZAn E ... w or•.lq Title tw re. ORA sCHBI.ES w.Ysr+ov FIELD MODIIICAT-AJ 1 SO 4148.01 • ASeOCIA. 6B, IWe MO•JTICILLO WASTlwATld ��—_�_ eu�Yr.a n. r•u„r T QDAT Ml NT PLANT 06901 00. ,��� •+n.�n •wnawu..unu rr CPA /QOJaCT NO c"oe57-es 1p"r22VISeD AIT. MDAWPAY AT WA6U. s G k4-1.4 &4.41 A4w"-,&, - (A , A R,cZ Pe—,4 :t -B,d Pqbs4 2sxa'�o.< K wo- y.SY �d� Am. 2 4.sg X 17s��d _ X802 5o2 ISO/. azo .J �J L' 20. 10* Stool pipe Flanged 20. qR. V1 /L.F. PART V The bidder shall complete the following list of unit adjustment prices to be used to adjust the contract price where additional or reduced work is required. 1. Excavation for Structures 1. '2."0 /cu.yd. 2. General Site Excavation 2. '1. So /cu.yd. 3. Fill material for Site Grading In Place 3. /cu.yd. 4. Footing Concrete Including Rein- forcement In Place 4. r,,. /cu.yd. 5. Wall Concrete Including Forming In Place 5. 2-z ro 0u /cu.yd. 6. Slab Concrete (On Grade) In Place 6. 11 5. /cu.yd. 7. Reinforcing Steel In Place 7. 0. /lb. 8. Granular Backfill Mechanically Compacted In Place. 8. lo. co:> /cu.yd. 9. 4" DIP Flanged 9. /L.F. 10. ti" DIP Flanged 10. 3O.`"``' /L.F. 11. S" DIP Flanged 11. -JA. 15 � /L.F. 12. 10" DIP Flanged 12. 'SO - tiI /L.F. 13. 4" FRP Pipe Flanged 13. \Z) '-\ /L.F. 14. 6" FRP Pipe Flanged 14. 271.7-1- /L.F. 15. 8" FRP Pipe Flanged is. -220 /L.F. 16. 10" FRP Pipe Flanged 16. 152..9r /L.F. 17. 4" Steel Pipe Flanged 17. � b. V6 /L.F. 18. 6" Steel Pipe Flanged is. 44,00 /L.F. 19. 8" Steel Pipe Flanged 19.__,q 19 /L.F. J,) �:r.. 1's � t 068-2748 ri, , PF 20. 10* Stool pipe Flanged 20. qR. V1 /L.F. ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2021 E. HENNEPIN AVE. • SUITE 238 MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55413 2 CHANGE ORDER NO . ................ 3,173.50.- City of Monticello ...... : .............. RE: Project, 'NO." '81-1 & 81- LaTour Construction, Inc.2 ............................................. Contractor Route I .. ................................... .......... Maple Lake, MN 35358 ................................................ Dear Sir W JUne,30 81 Under your contract dated' .... 1Y ..................... I ............ ID.... WItb The City -of Monticalio*f'' .Iinnesota Sanitary ..................... I 1� ..................... Owner for ............. .............. Sower, Water Main, Stern Sewer, Street Paving and Appurtenant Work ....................................................................... I ............. we are authorized by the owner to hereby direct you toprOVlde the material An.d. .perform ..tl.I.O.work ..ae..Outlined ..in your, .;pttqr.. October 2, 1981, and to modify tile north end of the culvert at ......... I ...................... ........................................................ ... Rive . r .. Street . . .. and d .. Co Rd.. . .. 7.5.. &.9 per .. the. dire.F tAon. . o,f..t.h a..County. Engineer (at an agrood .................................. ......................... I ...... ...... I ............................. I .......................................... I ........... and to add to 6&*UYWthe contract. In accordance with contract and specificaticn• the sum of Three . . Thousand . . . 0 . no Hu . nd . red 8 . ov . an . ty . . T : hr . so and --------50 . . ilOO Dollars "ere will be an extension' or ........ days for completion. 'no date of completion of contract was 11/1 81 and now will be 1001 A-w,d of -191W co"llact Total A ddill.-i T.1.1 DoducllwB 1. 0.1. C358,401.60 63,173. 69,310.00 1 $352,265.10 . ........................... 10.... Respectfully Submitted. .......................................... D...' ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON Approved .................... 19 .... ASSOCIATES, INC. ........................................... Per Co, -cfor LATOUR coNsT)? uCTION ROUTE I MAPLE LAKE, NN 55358 TELEPHONE 963-5993 act, ,2, 19- 7rr-Schel en-Mayer::n 'n & Asa�cioteo Inc. i,ttn. 11.,b L-rsen ::o. !--nticel);i 7riject 31-1 & 11-*? Charges fir extra materiv! F, perf rmecl nA c'wered by c-ntr6ct. Gen ti omen :%,revi usly re-.,-.rtei r;f:tui;. 25, 19rl are an itamized list of fAirce &cc :unt zzrh par;.,rmoi by Lat:xir C-*nstructim during m)ntho �-f July f! .'.ugust' 1931 !4-:-nticell) :-.Xtr,-. Charges Sche'dul'o 3 7/28 L.mera", w -ter service 1,nb )r & o.juj:nmen t ., hr. 1 IE5,1. 1 "5 7/7.01 'L,worotl tw, v-itar uervi'mi Lbbir & equi-,ant V.- hrv. , 25n. 625. X) ?:jwtoriel 141 -f c'.�*,por 14' 1-25 1?. 51, ln�uletl n V2 sq. ft. 7/3) 3-%vorod v.,oter main li.ydrzint load ,,-.b,.r i'-. c;uV,,mont 3 hrs. 25n. ..,vtoricl 1 611 53 bond offset 113 611 retainer Slnndo Insuln, ti Pn 4 eq. ft. 1.00 4 !jchcdule A Rnise 1 nonitDry m. lm. 7_', hra. 250. i7enot culvort nt hr. "50. • LA TOUR CONSTRUCTION ROUTE MAPLE LAKE. MN 55358 d TELEPHONE 963.'5993 Schedule .11 11 ,f Wydrnnt Zxtensim .;n Cedar Street TZTAL r,wiqd, C,,Iveel ev) 1',vee 'l reef Ov. r -Y- 77 IL7 KAJD —i n -1 A �- 103 36NUARY GENERAL FUND 1982 AMOUNT C Wright County State Bank - Investments 50,000.00 Wright County State Bank - Investments 100,000.00 Gwen Bateman - Animal Imp. expense 450.00 Wright County State Bank - Investments 310,000.00 Northern States Power - Utilities 4,805.08 Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - Dec. 1,680.20 State Treasurer - Monthly FICA payment 3,360.62 James Miller - Moving expense 1,000.00 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. 115.00 North Central Public Service - Utilities 1,510.82 Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins. 2,328.58 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees 339.00 Gruys, Johnson b Assoc. - Computer costs - Nov. 290.00 MN. State Treasurer - PERA payment 1,308.66 Monticello Rotary Club - Dues for G. Wieber (part of year) 41.00 NerLhWeSt rn Bell - Fire phone 25.24 Fusser -Franzen Agency - W. Comp. 6 Liab. policy premiums 1,846.46 Liquor Fund - Reimb. for overpayment of W. Comp. 286.83 Gary Wicber - Mileage expense for Jan. 150.00 Connecticut General Life Ins. - G. Wieber life ins. 94.63 Safeco Life Ins. Co. - Benefit plan payment 257.63 Fidulity Bank 6 Trust - 71 C. 0. 6 Water Rev. bond payments 23,382.73 Isl National Bank of St. Paul - 78 G. 0. Bond payments 219,253.95 Northwestern National Bank of Mpls. - 76-77-79-80-81 Bonds 539,397.85 First National Bank ofMpls. - 75 Mtce. Bldg. 6 S/W bonds 76,814.75 Leef Bros. Inc. - Uniforms 104.40 Equitable Life Assurance - Ins. W/II 40.00 McEnary, Krafft, Birch 6 Kilgore, Inc. - Architect fees - Lib. 434.00 Phillips Petro. - Cas for Fire Dept. 22.29 Purcell Plumbing - Materials for sink in loft sl Mlce. Bldg. 64.73 Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone 565.63 Amoco Oil Co. - Gas for Fire Dept. 61.48 Richard Brooks - Purchaseof mise. supplies 95.00 Curlia Industries - Nuts and bolts - Street Dept.. 121.14 Marco Business Products - 7 cases of paper - copier 269.80 Autu Con Industries - Repairs to Water pump controls 571.00 H.:n Franklin Store - Flash bulbs, film, tableloth (Mice.. Bldg.) 21.81 Monticello Fire Dept. - Reim. for mise, expenses 7/1/ - 12/31 293.75 Davis Electronics - 5 pager repairs 128.74 Medical Oxygen 4 Equip. Co. - Resuscitator repairs - Fire Dept. 15.00 Mid Central Fire Inc. - I cast. of gloves 6 hose gasket - Fire 85.80 Could Bros. Chev. - Bolls for 72 Chev, truck 1.40 Ziegler, Inc. - Loader repairs 42.82 Earl F. Anderson - 2 flashers, 10 cones, 2 blue lens lites - St 222.10 Feed Rile Controls - Fued rite, chlorine, tr_sting, etc. 1,935.46 Peoulone Corporation - 3 bags De-icer IU7.33 Co;ist to Coast - Misc. street dept. supplies 163.64 Commissioner of Revenue - Water excise tax - 4th qtr. 180.99 Monticello Fire Dept. - Payroll 1,891.00 llarry's Auto Supply - Point, thinner, lamps. ale. - St. Dept. 456.16 National Bushing - Mirrors, lamp, tape, etc. - St. Dept. 176.52 OSM - WWTP fees and Council meeting attendance (J. Bodalich) 21,049.73 M.W. O'Connor - Union negotalions expense 483.00 01aoo Electric - Furnace 6 pump repairs, move polo at Com. Lot 1,030.19 Monticello O K Hardware - Sandpaper, drill bit, etc. - St. 38.08 r/ GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO. Loren Klein - Mileage 341.97 15_—) Mr. Jerry (dein - Lost wages for attending Fire workshop- 3 days 90.00 15343 First National Bank of Mpls. - Service charge on invat. purchase 4.00 15344 Water Products - Water meter for Decorative Services 132.30 15345 Monticello Times - Misc. publishing 226.72 15346 Foster Franzen Agency - Auto ins: 6 Fire Dept. bond 49.00 15347 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR JAN. $1,370,256.01 J: C L LIQUOR FUND AMOUNT JANUARY DISBURSEMENTS - 1982 Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax 3686.00 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll deduction 20.00 State Treasurer - Monthly FICA payment 425.34 Old Peoria Co. - Liquor 765.31 Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor 864.27 Ed Phillipa d Sons - Liquor 5381.61 North Central Public Service - Utilities 79.67 Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone 54. 15 Cruys, Johnson 6 Assoc. - Computer processing - Oct. 110.00 Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins. 136.86 Foster Franzen Agency - Ins. pay=c.^.t 37.00 MN. State Treasurer - PERA payment 146.15 City of Monticello - Transfer to Gen. Fund 25279.14 City of Monticello - Add'l. premium on Inst. ins. policy 441.00 Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor 9342.87 Twin Clty Wine - Liquor 1735.27 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll deductions 20.00 Hick Doerr - Security personnel on holiday week -end 105.00 MN. State Treasurer - PERA payment 221.58 Wright County State Bank - Monthly FICA 499.00 unhert. Knmmer - Security personnel 105.00 Twin City Wine - Liquor 1076.87 Ed Phillips 6 Sono - Liquor 4576.00 Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor 6363.60 Midwest Wine Co. - Liquor 58.84 First National Bank of Mpla. - Revenue bonds payment 24125.00 Northern States Power - Utilities 496.75 Johnson Bros. - Liquor 148.67 Twin City Wine Co. - Liquor 1348.92 Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor 3615.12 Old Peoria Co. - Liquor 1148.64 Dahlheimer Dist. Co. - Beer, etc. 7136.06 Monticello 'times - Adv. 250.00 Twin City Pricing - Label gun 41.50 Our Own hardware - Bulbs, Christ. tree and lights 135.72 Maus Foods - Store expense 33.07 Yonak Sanitation - Garbage 69.00 Thorpe Dist. Co. - Meer, etc. 3574.55 A. J. Ogle - Beer 443.30 Groselein Beverage Co. - Beer 14662.54 Dick Beverage Co. - Beer 3362.30 T'rushenaki 'trucking - Freight 380.00 Day Dist. Co. - Misc. mdse. 207.10 7 Up Bottling Co. - Misc. mdse. 464.50 Viking Cocn Cola - Misc. mdse. 853.60 Jude Candy 6 'Tobacco - Misc. mdse. 536.16 Old Dutch Foods - Misc. mdse. 106.32 Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone - Dec. 52.53 Cummisaioner of Revenur. - SW't - Dec. 200.50 State Treasurer - Monthly Fico - Dec. 514.82 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll deduction 20.00 Banker's Life Ina. - Croupp Ina, MA 136'86 180.11 MN. State Treasurer - � Commissioner of Revenue-- Sales tax - Dec. 4990.Commissioner9 LIQUOR FUND JANUARY DISBURSEMENTS - CONT'D. Cruys, Johnson 6 Assoc. - Computer processing for Nov North Central Public Service - Utilities Monticello Times - Adv. Payroll for Dec. TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR JAN 110.00 304.45 211.38 3,961.84 $137,352.33 CHECK Nrj 10090 ➢0091 30092 COUNCIL UPDATE January 25, 1982 INVESTMENT INCOME In 1981, the City of Monticello earned over $181,000 in investment in- come exclusive of the Municipal Liquor Store. Interest income earned by the Liquor Store will be over $20,000 bringing the City's total in investment income for the 1981 calendar year to well over $200,000. APPOINTMENTS FOR LIBPARY BOARD At our last meeting, the Library Board was authorized to advertise and make recommendations to the City Council for replacements on the current Library Board. Irwin Kallin, who had previously indicated that he would like to be replaced, has agreed to serving an additional one year. As a result, only one replacement is necessary for Joel Erickson. At the City Council's next meeting, the Library Board should have a list of potential candidates who would consider the job to recommend to the City Council. REDUCTION IN STATE AID According to the latest information, the reduction in State aid for 1982 for Monticello will he approximately $8750. A like amount will be reduced for the State aid the City is entitled to for 1983. Both of these reductions, however, will be made for payments to be received in 1982, and as a result the City of Monticello will lose approximately $17,500 during 1982. This amounts to less than one percent (1%) of the total revenue budgeted for 1982. MINUTES 1 REGULAR. MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL January 11, 1982 - 7:30 P.M. Members Present: Arvc Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Phil White, Ken Maus, Dan Rlonigen. Meml,ers Absent: None. 1. Consideration of Awardinq Contract on Bids for 1500 Gallon Tanker Truck for the Fire Department. Bids were received on December 31, 1981 from five (5) equipment manufacturers for a 1500 gallon tanker truck for the Monticello Fire Department. The bids that were received were as follows: Company Basic Bid A• B• C• Del. Time ba Verne Fire Equip- $53,847 9n0.00 250.00 1,670 130 to ment, Inc. . 145 days Fire Safety Products, 53,528 1500.00 N/C No Bid 180 days Inc. A Pierce Manufacturing 55,326 824.00 374.00 No Bid 240 to i 300 days General Safety Equip- 57,676 590.00 590.00 3,500 365 to ment, Inc. 400 days Mid -Central Fire, Inc. 45,865 400.00 300.00 10,000 180 days *ALTERNATE A - Side Water Dump •ALTERNATE B - Jet Water Dump •ALTEIU7ATF. C- Stainless Steel noonter Tank After reviewing the bids that were received, the Monticello Fire Do- partment recommended that all bids be rejected at this time because there were various ineonaintenciea in the specifications drawn up by the Fire Department that were, brought to their attention by the various biddern. Fire Department Chief, Willard Farniek, and repro- nentative, Greg nahlheimer, informed the Council that these incon- nistoncies In the specifications would be changed and recommended that the 1500 gallon tanker truck be. rebid and brought to the Council on February Rth, 1982. A motion was made by White, aeconded by Maus and unanimously carried to reject all hide for the 1500 gallon tanker truck and to authorize the Fire Department personnel to revise the specifications for re- bidding February Rth, 1982. Council Minutes -1/11/82 �• 2. Consideration of Awardinq Contract on Library Shelvinq. Bids were received on January 6, 1982 by the Library Board on shelving requirements for the new public library. Bids received were as follows: Basic Charging Name Shelving Desk Tables Total DMO, Inc. of Mpls. 17,497.00 5,983.00 3,261.00 $26,741.00 Mid-America Busi- ness Systems 19,112.00 5,879.00 4,348.00 29,339.00 Alternate Bid for Mid-America Busi- 13,906.00 4,526.00 2,366.00 20,798.00 ness Systems Walters Cabinets 14,147.19 1,930.20 2,337.20 18,414.59 Library Board Chairman, Loren Klein, reviewed the bids received with the Council and recommended that the contract be awarded to Walters Cabinets in the amount of $18,414.59. In addition to the base price of $18,414.59, Mr. Klein and the Library Board Committee recommended that change orders be implemented with Walters Cabinets increasing the amount of the bid to $22,178.49 which would change the proposed shelving to be made out of solid •good rather than particle board and J _. additional formica under tables in the bid. It was noted that even with the additional change order if the low bid was accepted, the $22,178.49 would still be lower than the other bids received for shelving. A motion was made by Maus, seconded by White and unanimously carried to award the contract on the library shelving including the charging desk and tables to Walters Cabinets in the amount of $18,414.59 with change orders also being added as recommended by the Library Board bringing the total to $22,178.49. 3. Consideration of Appointment of Committee Members and Various City Functions and Duties. A list of the present committee members, functions and duties was presenter) to the Council for review for consideration of annual reappointments to the various committees, etc. All appointments are on an annual basis with the exception of the Bouning and Redevelopment Authority and the Library Board which under State Statutes require membership to tho 11RA to be on a rotating five year Main and membership on the Library Board to he on a rotating three year Innis. J. Council Minutes - 1/11/82 1. The Planning Commission currently has one vacany due t0 the resig- nation of Dick Martie effective December 31, 1981 and it was rec- ommended that Joyce Dowling be appointed to this vacancy on the Planning Commission. A motion was made by White, seconded by Blonigen and unanimously carried to appoint Joyce Dowling to the vacancy created on the Planning Commission by the resignation of Dick Martie and to re- appoint the present committee members to another one year term. The five year term of %ob Doty on the Housing s Redevelopment Authority expired December 31, 1981 and it was recommended that ,jr. Doty's term he renewed for an additional five years. The Library Board committee had two members expiring on December 31, 1981 and Dr. Joel Erickson and Mr. Irwin Kallin have indicated that they would not be interested in serving on the board for an addition- al term. The Council members recommended that the Library Board Committee seek applicants for the two vacancies created on the Library Board and submit a list of recommendations to the City Council for their consideration. A motion was made by Fair, neconded by white and unanimously carried to appoint the balance of the City of Monticello committee members, city official functions and duties as listed and reviewed by the _ Council with the exception of the Library Board which will be con- sidered at a later date. See Exhibit 1/11/82 41. 4. Consideration of Approval of Moving Expense for James E. Miller. A request was made by Mr. James E. Miller, the new Wastewater Treat- ment Plant Superintendent, to reduce his salary by $1,000 in 1982 with the reduction being applied towards his moving expense to Monti- cello. Mr. Miller's now position of Wastewater Treatment Plant Superinton- dent started on January 4, 1982 at a base salary of $21,300.00 a year without any moving expense allowance. Mr. Miller now is making a request that the city adjust his salary for 1982 by $1,000 in order that lie may cover such expenses in his move from New Ulm, Minn- esota to Monticello. Mr. Miller also indicated that he would be agreeable to signing an aqreemnnt whereby he would pay hack any unused portion of thin $1,000 ahonld his aplointment with the City of Monti- cello he terminated prior to December 31, 1982. 3 _C Council Minutes - 1/11/82 The primary purpose for making the adjustment in his salary of $1,000 for moving expenses was that this would allow Mr. Miller immediate funds to absorb his costs of moving to Monticello and additionally, this expense reimbursement would not be taxable to Mr. Miller and also the City of Monticello would save some benefits by allowing the moving expense adjustment. Some concerns were expressed by Council members that this pro- cedure may set a precedent for future new employees of the city, but a motion was made by White, seconded by Fair to approve the agreement with Mr. Miller for the allocation of $1,000 for moving expenses and reducing his salary for 1982 by a similar amount. voting in favor was Maus, Fair and White. Opposed was Blonigen and Grimsmo. In addition it was noted that the legalities of this agreement will be checked with the city attorney. See Exhibit #2 5. Consideration of Rental of Kermit Lindberg Home to James E. Miller. The closing date for the City of Monticello to acquire the Kermit Lindberg property adjacent to the Wastewater Treatment Plant is scheduled for February 1st, 1982. Mr. James Miller, the new Waste- water Treatment Plant Superintendent, has indicated that he would like to rent this home from the City of Monticello. The proposed rent would be $350 a month plus utilities and would be payable a month in advance with 30 days notice required should Mr. Miller decide to move. A motion was made by Maus, seconded by Blonigen and unanimously carried to approve the renting of the Kermit Lindberg residence to Mr. James Miller effective February let, 1982 at a monthly cost of $350 with the rent being paid one month in advance and 30 days notice required before moving. G. Consideration of Transfer from Capital Outlav Revolving Fund to Sower Fund for Coot Involved in Purchase of Ko rmit Lindburq Resi- dence. It was recommended by the City Administrator that the Council transfer the funds necessary to purchase the Kermit Lindberg property from the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund to the Sewer Fund in the amount of 5100,000 plus other related costs expected not to exceed $1,000. A motion was made by White, seconded by Fair and unanimously carried to approve the transfer of 5100,000 and other related costs from the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund to the Sower Fund for the acquisition of the Kermit Lindberg residence for future Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion. - 4 - 11 Council Minutes - 1/11/82 7. Adoption of Sewer User Charge ordinance. I As part of the EPA regulations in regard to the grant program for'the Wastewater Treatment Plant Construction updating, the EPA requires that the City of Monticello enact a sewer user charge ordinance prior to 8O1b reimbursement from the Federal government. It appears at this time that a request for 8Oe reimbursement will occur on approximately February 1, 1982. A proposed ordinance has been drafted by Mr. Jerry Corrick with the consulting engineering firm of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron and Associates along with John Simola, Public Works Director, and the City Administrator that if adopted, would become effective January 1, 1983. With the adoption of the sewer user charge ordinance, the City of Monticello would switch from a declining block rate schedule to a straight line rate which in effect, charges the same fee per quantity used regardless of the actual quantity rather than charging less as additional water is used. Although the proposed ordinance does indicate how the charge for each residence, commercial and industrial user will be determined, the actual rates would not he adopted until later on in 1982 to he effective January 1, 1983. The greatest impact on any one user will more than likely affect wrighteo Products, Inc. the most, since they are not only based on useage but also on the strength and suspended solids of their wastes. A motion was made by nlonigen, seconded by Maus and unanmiously carried to approve the adoption of a resolution enacting the proposed ordinance amendment for the sewer user charge ordinance as presented. Ser. Ordinance Amendment 1/11/820111, Resolution 034. 8. Consideration of Approval of Chanqo Order 022 With the Paul A. Laurence Company on the Wastewater Treatment Plant Construction Contract. It was recommended that a change order be initiated with the Paul A. ].aurence Company on the. Wastewater Treatment Plant Construction contract for an addition of a 25 foot by 9 foot concrote slab on grade at the sludgo vehicle garage to protect against bituminous deterioration caused by npilla at the fuel site. This concrete alnb would replace the bituminous surfacing called for in the area. Council Minutes - 1/11/82 '•� Some concerns were expressed by some of the Council members over the price of the change order which was felt to be too high for the work being performed. The City Engineer, John Badalich, indicated that this price for the change order was negotiated with the contractor, but addition- al negotiations regarding the price could be pursued if desired. A motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by Fair and unanimously carried to table consideration of change order 022 for the addition of a concrete slab to allow the city engineer to further negotiate with the Paul A. Laurence for a possible lower price. 9. Consideration of Renewinq Contract with YMCA for Detached Worker. Previously, the City of Monticello had a contract with the YMCA for a detached worker program for the City of Monticello which expired December 31, 1981. The 1982 budget called for a projected increase of 101 over the previous annual figure of $2,825 to $3,100 annually. A motion was made by Fair, seconded by Blonigen and unanimously carried to approve the 1982 contract for the YMCA Detached worker Program in the amount of $3,100. See 1/11/82 Exhibit 03. 10. Department Bond Quarterly Meeting. The City Council reviewed and discussed various issues with the following department heads in attendance: Fire Chief - Willard Farnick Wright County Representatives - Buddy Gay and Don iiozempa YMCA Detached Worker - Mike violated Public Works Director - John Simola Building Inspector/Civil Defense Director - Loran Klein City Administrator - Gary wieber Willard Parnick, Fire Chief, discussed with the Council tho poo- o1bility of increasing the current fire department wageu from $7.00 an hour for the first hour and $5.00 thereafter to a utraight $0.00 per hour. It was noted that it has been approxi- mately three years since an increase has boon granted for the fire department salaries and the Council indicated that they would consider this item at a later meeting. It was also noted by Mr. Farnick that since the installation of a repeater antenna has been inatnlled, the fire department pager system for notifi- cation of fire calls has improved and all members are now ra- calving the signals. - 6 - l Council Minutes - 1/11/82 Sheriff's Department representatives, Buddy Gay and Don Rozempa, reviewed with the Council the possibility of increasing the hours of coverage for police protection within Monticello. Mr. Iiozempa noted that approximately 64 calls during the past 78 days has been received by the Sheriff's Department requiring patrol in Monticello during the hours not currently covered under contract. The Council noted that the possibility of increased coverage would be taken under advisement for possible consideration at a future date. Karen Hanson Senior Citizens Center Director, reviewed with the Council possible expansion plans to the Senior Citizens Center once Monticello printing leaves for their new building. Currently, Monticello printing is using a portion of the present Senior Citi- zens building for a printing shop and once they leave Karen would like to expand into this area for Senior Citizens Center use. Once more detailed plans are available, the Council will be review- ing the cost involved and also review the possible parking problems at the Senior Citizens Center. Public Works Director, John Simola, noted that the City is current- ly experimenting with using fly ash on name of the city streets rather than using sand and salt. Mr. Simola noted that some pro- blems have occurred with freezing of the fly ash but the experiment will continue. Civil Defense Director, Loren Klein, noted that a Civil Defense Exercise will take place on March 2, 1982 in regard to planning for a nuclear incident. in addition, Mr. Klein recommended that the City Council consider abandoning its prenent housinq code since State Statutes and the building code currently cover items re- lating to housing tinficieneien etc. City Administrator, Cary Wielor, informed the City Council that the cities of Monticello, Elk River and Big lake have been re- viewing and discussing cable T.V. franchises for the area. Mr. Wisher noted that a microwave. cable T.V. franchise would be able to serve an area approximately 12 miles in all directions, and therefore would cover quite a few towns in this area. it was suggested that maybe an invitation should be made to the State Cable Board to be present at a mooting of officials from area towns to discuss and determine what interest there may be from communities in pursuing a cable T.V. franchine. Ono possibility would he of setting up a joint agreement with neighboring com- munition to pursuo a franchise area if sufficient interest is generated for a cable T.V. system. The City Administrator also reviewed with the Council the current status on the possibility of ansasaing the Edgar Klueaa property for newer and water improvements that were recently installed under the 81-1 Improvement Projects. Council Minutes - 1/11/82 F• i The City Administrator indicated that at a future meeting, a discussion and a decision will have to be made regarding whether the property should be assessed at all, considering the property is currently Green Acres and would he deferred anyway. 11. Consideration of an Approval of an Agreement for Use of the Mobile Relay System. The State of Minnesota, Division of Emergency Services, is cur- rently installing a radio communications system at the City Hall for use in coordinating emergency functions with the cities of Becker, Big Lake, Sherburne County and Wright County. As part of the instailation of the equipment, the State of Minnesota is re- questing that the City of Monticello and Wright County sign an agreement indicating that the City of Monticello will use and operate the system only for emergency related incidences and that the control of the equipment will be maintained exclusively by the Department of Emergency Services. The agreement would be in effect for a period of five years with termination rights by the State of Minnesota or the City of Monti- cello within 90 days notice. It was recommended by the Civil Defense Director that since the y City of Monticello is providing the property for the antenna and tower to be located on, that the city consider amending the agree- ment to indicate that the tower bx±comes the property of the city should the State decide to ahandon the radio system. A motion was made by White, seconded by Blonigon and unanimously carried to authorize the execution of an agreement with the Division of Rmorgeney Services for the use of a mobile relay system in our radio communications system provided that the agreement is amended to indicate that the tower structure would remain city property should the State decide to abandon the radio system. Sao Exhibit 1/11/82 #4. 12. Approval of Bills for the Month of Docomher, 1981 and approval of the ttinutes. A motion was made by White, seconded by Maue and unanimously carried to approve the remainder of the bills for the month of December as presented and the minutes of the regular mooting hold on December 14, 1981. fico Exhibit 1/11/82 N 5. ONE v Council Minutes - 1/11/82 i 13. Discussion on Resienation of City Administrator. Gary wicber, City Administrator, informed the Council that effective February 1, 1982, he will be resigning as City Administrator to take another position locally. Due to the resignation, a motion was made by White, seconded by Maus and unanimously carried to advertise in the League of Cities magazine, the Minneapolis Star and Tribune, and the St. Paul Pioneer Dispatch for the position of Citv Administrator. A motion was also made by Fair, seconded by White and unanimously carried to name Rick wolfsteller as acting administrator effective February 1, 1982 until such time as an administrator is officially appointed to fill the position recently created by Gary wieber's resignation. _ Meeting Adjourned. Rick wolfste1 'r Assistant Administrator - 9 - Honorable Mayor City Ccuncil Monticello, Minn. 55362 Dear Council: Enclosed is the Sheriff's Lav Enforcement report for the month of December, 1981. 564 flours of petrol service were contracted for during the period in which the following activities were talliedt 2 - Simple assaults - both cleared by arrest I - Theft of battery from vehicle 1 - Criminal damage to property - Christmas tree lights broken 3 - Mailboxes vandalised - 2 were cleared I - Criminal damage to property - vehicle slid into garage door at Mobil station I - Theft of ltithted garland from door of What Knot Shop - garland recovered lutbulbe missing ' wAttempted burglary of garage - no entry gained Theft of two bicycles I - limb threat at Wright County State Bank - cleared by arrest of juvenile I - Theft of 3 barrels of copper from Olson Electric I - Criminal damage to property - vehicle at Monti Ford shot by BB gun I - Theft of 7 strings of Christmas tree lights from front yard - 2 strings recovered but bulbs all missing 1 - Shoplifter at lien Franklin - cleared by arrest I - No pay customer at Tom Thumb - cleared b bill was paid 1 - Theft of money from amusement machine at the Mall I - Criminal damage to property - windshield 6 window in vehicle broken I - burglary at Independent Lumber - no loss but extensive damages - under investigation I - Theft of money from washing machine at Stelton's Laundromat I - Theft of gas from vehicle 1 - Forgery - under investigation I - Theft of license plate from vehicle 2 - Shoplifting at Snyder* - both cleared 1 - Criminal damage to property - wrestling mat at Junior High School cut with knife - under investigation I - Theft of two guns from residence I - Shoplifting at Skogmo's - cleared by arrest I - Theft of toboggan from vehicle 1 - Criminal damage to property 6 theft of money taken from the Star 6 Tribune box - cleared by arrest M Sff1M1Fg`S. - 0FF10E ` • .. �r s y'�,�<..�^�;aq�f - - ` _ .. . ' c°�°aw""m _ w,#�t ca>Rtr BUFFALO. NRMN[60TA 66717 F. poy,n,ief jasym Iry fesphane 24 Hou Emmpmcy Uses! o,rs ,k NOa[tew6attey Bus No 662-1800 Ten has 1.600.662.9667 MUM 473.6873 ••' OANABtt, L: MOLFR6.•00 am. - 4:d0 P.M. Montkalo 295 M 'Cathy 6bwi" _ .. Delano 972.2924 cokno X846460 January 18, 1982 Honorable Mayor City Ccuncil Monticello, Minn. 55362 Dear Council: Enclosed is the Sheriff's Lav Enforcement report for the month of December, 1981. 564 flours of petrol service were contracted for during the period in which the following activities were talliedt 2 - Simple assaults - both cleared by arrest I - Theft of battery from vehicle 1 - Criminal damage to property - Christmas tree lights broken 3 - Mailboxes vandalised - 2 were cleared I - Criminal damage to property - vehicle slid into garage door at Mobil station I - Theft of ltithted garland from door of What Knot Shop - garland recovered lutbulbe missing ' wAttempted burglary of garage - no entry gained Theft of two bicycles I - limb threat at Wright County State Bank - cleared by arrest of juvenile I - Theft of 3 barrels of copper from Olson Electric I - Criminal damage to property - vehicle at Monti Ford shot by BB gun I - Theft of 7 strings of Christmas tree lights from front yard - 2 strings recovered but bulbs all missing 1 - Shoplifter at lien Franklin - cleared by arrest I - No pay customer at Tom Thumb - cleared b bill was paid 1 - Theft of money from amusement machine at the Mall I - Criminal damage to property - windshield 6 window in vehicle broken I - burglary at Independent Lumber - no loss but extensive damages - under investigation I - Theft of money from washing machine at Stelton's Laundromat I - Theft of gas from vehicle 1 - Forgery - under investigation I - Theft of license plate from vehicle 2 - Shoplifting at Snyder* - both cleared 1 - Criminal damage to property - wrestling mat at Junior High School cut with knife - under investigation I - Theft of two guns from residence I - Shoplifting at Skogmo's - cleared by arrest I - Theft of toboggan from vehicle 1 - Criminal damage to property 6 theft of money taken from the Star 6 Tribune box - cleared by arrest M 6 . i DAfefeaLL L. moLfasv c«etr atw,.irr SNER/FF's OFFICE cow"asese—va C*047 BUFFALO. ABilltaMA 43313 TeIII wns 661i162 No"Me.6wry a" faa. Sa2Jl00 Tall Fres I -NO -362.3667 B:oo a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Sheriff's report for Monticello for December, 1981. continued, 1 - Theft of diesel fuel from truck parked at Silver fox Inn 2 Arrests for bench warrants 4 - Arrests for disorderly conduct 2 - Arrests for possession of marijuana - Arrests for runaways from Becker County I1 - Suspicious circumstances, persons 8 vehicles 8 - Alarms sounded - checked out o.k. 2 - Liquor law violations I - Runaway - located 2 - Detox 2 - Medical aide 4 - Domestics 2 - Snowmobile complaints - Public nuisances 1 - Recovered property 2 - Civil matters - Miscellaneous complaints - Traffic problems 1 - intoxicated person 1 - Fire reported 99 - Car d sublect checks 41 • Citizen aids 22 • Motorists warned IS - Accidents investigated 97 - Traffic tickets tasuedt 71 • Illegal parking {includes snowbirds} 1 - Improper registration 9 • SpQed l - Open bottle 1 - Passing in no pass sone _ 2 - Expired plates 3 - Driving alter suspension 1 Isspr;per U-turn 2 - Driving after revocation 1, - Arrstic driving 2 - Disobeyed semaphore l - Disobeyed stop sign 2 - Driving while intoxicated Pours truly n ,,,.l1%t t rrlr•" � .� %t Darrell Wolff. Sheriff Billingt for the month of December, 1981 -- S 6,933.33 1. lamer F. Povra Chief DeWh 24 Hou. Emeaemv Takwh trva 473.6673 Monti.4o 2962623 oetrm 972.2B24 CA.kM le6-644 f I MEMORANDUM TO: Council Members FROM: Rick Wolfstal cr, Acting Allininictrator. DATE: February 8, 1982 SUBJECT: Amendment to Item 01 in the Council Minutes for Jan- uary 25, 1982. In regard to the minutes for January 25, 1982 for the public hearing on the proposed assessment for the Edgar Klucas parcel, paragraph 2, sub paragraph 1 should be amended to read as follows: That there may be a question as to the actual benefit pro- vided by the assessments as an appraiser was hired by the City and determined that Mr. Klucas•s property could possibly he developed in the future with alternate roadway alignments and could he served with sewer and water improvements from a different direction making the present sewer and water improve - mento along ?iver Street not as beneficial to the property at this time. 1 Council Agenda - 2/8/82 Additional Information Reqardinq Bids Received for the 1500 Gallon Tanker Truck and Truck Chassis. The Fire Department personnel have reviewed the bids received on February 1, 1982, to see how they complied with the specifications and have indicated that the bid received from Laverne Fire Equip- ment Company on the 1500 gallon tanker and pumper did not comply on the following items: 1. Bid specifications called for the pump to be rated at 475 gallons per minute and be a two stage pump. Although the specification sheet attached to the bid by Laverne Equipment Company has been checked indicating they meet specifications, the brochures attached to the bid indicate that the pump would be of a single stage capacity with a 375 gallon per minute pumping capacity. 2. Specifications called for the 1500 gallon tank to be con- structed of 10 gauge steel with the bottom to be 3/16 inch thick. According to fire department research, Laverne's tank would not be 3/16 inch thick at the bottom as required by the specifications. Also the specifications indicate that the tank should be of a (T) shape design to provide for deep side compartments, while the Laverne tank is an oval shape making for smaller compartments at the top. Specifications also call for the inside of the tank to he lined with two coats of guardian two harrier coats - an epoxy compound which is flexible. The Laverne tank would be lined with fiber glans which,according to fire department personnel, would not he as flexible. 3. Specifications require that all valves be a watereas ball type, which the Fire Department indicates that Laverne's would not be. In regard to the truck chassis, apparently both the Chevrolet model from Goulds and the Ford from Monticello Ford do moot specifications. The Fire Department members did have a question on whether the Ford model did provide multi -leaf rear springs and this information should be available from the Piro Department mcmhoro at tonight's meeting.