City Council Agenda Packet 06-14-1982AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
June 14, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve Grimsmo.
Council Members: Phil White, Ken Maus, Fran Fair, Dan Blonigen.
Meeting to be taped.
I. Call To order.
A) Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting Held on May 24, 1982.
B)
Petitions, Requests, Complaints/Citizens Comments.
II. Public
Hearinq.
A)
Burlington Northern Railroad: Notice of Intent to Abandon
the Rogers to Monticello line (Informational Hearing).
III. Unfinished
Business.
A)
Reaolutions Relatinq to the Improvement of 7th Street.
B)
Consideration of Comments from a Representative of the
Property owners Affected by the Lift Station Failure.
IV. New Business.
A)
Consideration of 1981 Audit Report.
B)
Consideration of Approval of Intoxicating Liquor, Non -In-
toxicating Malt Liquor, Club Liquor and Set -Up Licenses.
C)
Consideration of Granting a Temporary 3.2 Bear License to
Monticello Lion's Club for the 4th of July Celebration.
D)
Consideration of Lifting Restrictive Covenant Related to
Parking for "Pizza Factory".
E)
Resolution: Moratorium on Manufactured Housing.
F)
Rosolution: Moratorium on Planned Unit Development.
G)
Consideration of Change orders 037, 038 and 039.
H)
Consideration of Einployeo Asoictanco Program and Overall
1
Personnel Policy Revisions.
CI)
Adjourn.
Council Agenda - 6/14/82
SUPPLEMENT
I. Call To Order.
A) Approval of the Minutes of the meeting held on May 24, 1982.
B) Petitions, Requests, Complaints/Citizens Comments.
II. Public Hearing.
A) Burlington Northern Railroad: Notice of Intent to Abandon
the Rogers to Monticello line (Informational Ilearing).
As you are aware, sometime ago the Minnesota Department of
Transportation and Interstate Commerce Commission filed with
the City and others, a Notice of Intent to Abandon the Rogers
to Monticello line as filed by Burlington Northern Railroad.
Up to this point, the City government of Monticello has not
taken an official position either opposing or supporting the
petition request. In a discussion with Mayor Grimsmo approxi-
mately two weeks ago, we agreed that perhaps the City should
conduct an informational hearing with as many representatives
from the concerned hr.Yiies as possible in attendance. 1 have
contacted several persons and have tentative agreements from
them that they will be in attendance at the June 14th meeting.
The persons that I have contacted are as follows: Mr. Isaac
McCrary Jr. from Minnesota Department of Transportation,
State Representative Bob McPachern and Mr. Tom Ehlinger of
the Law Department at Burlington Northern Railroad. Mr. Mc-
Crary and Mr. Ehlinger both stated that if they themselves
did not attend, one of their associates would in fact, be
present. On Monday, June 7th, I received a call from Mr. Leon
Eliaoon of NSP, who informed me that NSP would be intervening
in opposition to this petition to abandon. I informed him
over the phone of the informational meeting to be hold next
Monday and extended him an invitation. Again, if lie
cannot attend, more than likely an associate from the firm
will attend. Rnlativo to the actual mooting, I have indicated
to all of the persons that this is strictly an informational
hearing and not a formal public hearing where their comments
and opinions would be recorded for either the ICC or the Do-
partment of Transportation. The mooting is strictly to pro-
vido information and comment so that the City Council can
make their judgement in accordance with the information ro-
coived.
C
Council Agenda - 6/14/82
In a matter closely related to the possible abandonment,
when the notice was first filed, Mr. Bondhus of the City
Planning Commission pointed out that the comprehensive plan
for Monticello indicated interest in acquiring railroad
right-of-way in the event that the right-of-way was abandon-
ed by the railroad. In light of that, I did send a non -
position letter to the Interstate Commerce Commission stating
simply that at the time of that writing no official position
has been taken by the City, but in the event that abandonment
is granted, the City is interested in the acquisition of the
property for trail development.
I suggest that the Council be prepared to adopt a resolution
either supporting or opposing the abandonment and that it be
adopted on Monday evening after all of the information has
been given. Such a resolution could be adopted either immedi-
ately after the hearing or it could be tabled for further dis-
cussion at the and of the meeting which would give you a little
time to collate the information.
REFERENCES: Copies of letters to the various parties invited
to the hearing, a copy of the letter to the ICC, copies of
rc=ol,it'ons (One supportinq, one opposinq) related to the
abandonment.
III. Unfinished Business.
A) Resolutions Relating to the Improvement of 7th Street.
John Badalich informs me that he fully expects to have detail-
ed plans and specifications for the improvement of 7th Street
ready to present at the Monday Council meeting. 1 have not
received copies of the plans and do not know if he will have
them to us far enough in advance that you may receive a copy
prior to the meeting. Loren Klein has confirmed that we will
have a petition with 1001A of the affected property owners re-
quescing the improvement, and thus, we may dieponso with the
public hearing. If the plane as proaented aro complete enough
by Monday night that a determination can he made by the Council,
then I recommend that all resolutions be adopted and that a call
for bids be issued.
REFERENCESi A copy of all resolutions concerned and a copy of
petition for the public improvement.
- 2 -
i
Council Agenda - 6/14/82
B) Consideration of Comments from a Representative of the
Property Owners Affected by the Lift Station Failure.
On Monday, May 24, 1982, Walt Mack of the city crew
discovered that one of the check valves in pump N2 at the
West Bridge Park lift station was out of order. City crews
immediately went to work and pulled the valve, and made
arrangements to order the new part, which at that time
they thought had to be ordered from Mississippi or Alabama
and would take 3 to 4 weeks for delivery. On Thursday
evening, May 27th, approximately 6:00 P.M., there was a
power failure at that lift station causing a back up of
wastewater into several property owners basements along
Front Street. John Simola, who was working in Ellison Park,
was paged and assembled enough man power to get the power
back on and the pumps working again. On Friday, Saturday
and Sunday, I had available city staff drive by the affected
property owners homes and pick up garbage and debris that
they had set out since we did not have garbage pickup and
it would be considerable time till there was pickup again.
Also on Friday, I talked with Jon Franzen, our insurance
agent, and explained the situation to him. It was his
opinion that our insurance company, perhaps, would not
cover the damage since it was not a matter of personnel
%L negligence nor was it a result of a lightning strike or
some other such natural dioaster. He did say, however,
that I should compile as much information about the lift
station failure and that if a property case could be
established, we would submit to our insurance company in
order to give some financial assistance to the property
owners.
On Wednesday, Juno 2nd, I visited each of the houses that
were affected fin come cases, finding no one home) to ex-
plain exactly what the City was doing about the problem.
I explained that if all persons concerned would submit
their claim to me, I would in turn file a composite claim
with our insurance company, but at this timo I could not
guarantee that the insurance company would honor the claim.
I noted further that should tho insurance company not honor
the claim, they would have the right to come before the
City Council to oxpr000 their dissatisfaction, if that is
what they desired.
3
C
Council Agenda - 6/14/82
Later that same Wednesday, I received a letter from Metcalf
and Larson who wrote representing the residents that they
would like to be on the June 14th agenda to express their
feelings on the matter. Mrs. Thimmesh, one of the affected
residents, indicated that a great deal of their dissatis-
faction is a result of the fact that no one in the area was
notified about pump 02 being out of operation and there was
potential for sewer backup. She contends that were they
notified, each homeowner could have taken steps to minimize
the damage in the event of a lift station failure. I point-
ed out to her that the failure of the pump did not necessarily
mean that there would be an overall lift station failure and
we did not see that it warranted a notification in this par-
ticular case. I also informed each of them that we very
likely would not have a determination from the insurance
company by the June 14th meeting; however, Mrs. Thimmesh
said they would still wish to appear before the Council on
the 14th.
My recommendation is that we grant them a limited amount of
time to express their feelings on the matter, but refrain
from making any offers of assistance. We should insist that
we must wait until we receive determination from our insur-
ance company. you probably should nota that in the avant
that the insurance company does not honor the claim, you will
gladly reopen discussion on the matter.
REFERENCES: My letter to the property owners, letter from
Metcalf and Larson, report by Simola, and report by Mack.
IV. Now Business.
A) Consideration of 1981 Audit Report.
The city auditors will be present to discuss the 1981 Audit
Report, and answer any questions you may have. While this
is a relatively short time for you to review the audit to
be prepared to go over it, I think you will find it basically
self explanatory. If, at a later date, you have additional
questions concerning the audit report and the financial
operations of the City for 1981, we can certainly invite the
auditors to return for a more prolonged discussion.
REFERENCES: A copy of the 1981 Audit Report.
l _ 4 _
Council Agenda - 6/14/82
S) Consideration of Approval of Intoxicating Li-quor, Non -Intoxi-
cating Malt Liquor, Club Liquor and Sot -Up Licenses.
The following licenses must be renewed effect July 1, 1982.
1. Intoxicating Liquor License, on -sale (Fee $3,000.00).
a. Monticello Liquors, Inc.
b. Silver Fox Motel.
e. Wayside Inn.
d. Joyner's Lanes.
2. Intoxicating Liquor, on -sale, Sunday (Pee $100.00).
_ a. Monticello Liquors, Inc.
b. Silver Fox Motel.
c. Wayside Inn.
d. Joyner's Lanes.
3. non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor, on -sole (Fuo $220.00).
a. Friend's Cafe.
b. Monticello Rod 6 Gain Club.
C. PtaZaFactory.
d. manticollo Country Club (New license).
4. Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor, off -Dole (Fee $33.00).
a. Monticello Liquors, Inc.
b. Yxnio'a Mit Shop.
c. Wayne's Rod Owl.
d. Maus Foods.
o. River Terrace Trailer Park Store.
P.. Tam Thumb Suporatte.
g. Wayside Inn.
h. Holiday Station.
5. Sot -Up Liconoo (Fes 8220.00).
a. tlonticallo Country Club.
b. Monticello Rod 6 Gun Club.
6. Club Liquor Licanoo (Poo 8220.00).
( n. marican Legion Club.
b. V.P.W. Club.
- 5 -
Council Agenda - 6/14/82
The fees reflected in the above list are those that became effec-
tive on November 24, 1981. The new license for not -intoxicating
malt liquor, on -sale for the Monticello Country Club is a result
of finding out that they have never had a license although they
have sold beer. Apparently, they have been operating under the
misunderstanding that possession of a set-up license also allow-
ed the sale of 3.2 beer. This matter should be rectified this
year. I recommend that in order to expedite matters, a single
motion be drafted granting all licenses. The motion could take
the form of "I move that the following applicants be granted the
license/licenses for which they applied, effective July 1, 1982".
I will usually formally contact the local law enforcement agency
to determine if any of the operations create a substantial num-
ber of problems. While I have not contacted Wright County
Sheriff's Department formally, I have talked with Officer Gay
and been told that there has been no substantial increase in
problems related to liquor establishments.
C) Consideration of Granting a Temporary 3.2 Beer License to
the Monticello Lion's Club for the 4th of July Celebration.
Mark Irmiter will be representing the Lion's Club at this
meeting to make their request for this temporary license. He
_s well aware cl the publicity and questions being raised about
the granting of a temporary license. The Lion's do, however,
wish to continue their past practice of being able to sell
beer during the 4th of July celebration.
D) Consideration of Lifting Restrictive Covenant Related to
Parking for the Pizza Factory.
Laren Klein informed me that at the time the Pizza Factory was
built, a restrictive covenant was placed on the building per-
mit prohibiting their operations during the normal business
day because of a limited amount of, parking space. Mr. Gkogren
has now requested that the covenant be lifted so that he may
open and operate during the lunch hour at least during the
summer months. It is Mr. Gkogron's contention that with the
development of the commuter parking lot, many parking spaces
have boon opened up in the downtown area and that his lunch
business would not create any significant congestion.
Rick in reviewing, at this time, information relating to the
original parking assessment that would be levied in 1983 against
this entire building area. if,in fact, substantial parking
assessment has to be paid, than I coo it to be unreasonable
that they not be allowed to be open. As I noted, Mr. Ekagron
is primarily concerned with tooting this out through the sum -
mor months, and I coo no real difficulty in doing this. If,
during the trial period, we discover there is severe parking
problems, then the entire plan would have to be reviewed.
Fnclosod for your reference is the parking agreement dated
December 26, 1900.
-g -
Council Agenda - 6/14/82
If we do allow him to open during the noon hour, we must
emphasize that this is strictly on a trial basis and that
the covenant may be replaced if a problem is discovered.
E) Resolution: Moratorium on Manufactured Housing.
The Minnesota Legislature has pointed out that manufactured
housing can no longer be kept out of residential dwelling
zones for the simple reason that they are manufactured
housing. As a result of this decision, Loren and Mr. Dahlgren
are preparing new requirements for manufactured housing that
will in effect, still place certain requirements on their
placement. Related very closely to this is the preliminary
proposal by Mr. B3ylefor his development in the southeast
area of the City, a large part of which would be manufactured
housing. In order for the City to maintain a certain amount
of control on housing quality standards, our zoning ordinance
requires amendments to address these manufactured housing
issues. Thus, Loren has requested a resolution setting a
moratorium on all manufactured housing until such time as the
ordinance is amended and the new code is in effect. The fol-
lowing resolution, lettered F on planned unit development
is closely related and the moratorium is for the very same
reason ns the one on mnnnfnrtnrerl housing. Amain, it relates
closely to the proposed development by Mr. Boyle and the fact
that the zoning ordinance does need amendments to bring us in
compliance with current Statuteslut still allow us to have
certain quality control.
REFERENCES: Copies of each resolution.
F) Resolution: Moratorium on Planned Unit Development.
Sao above.
G ) Consideration of Change orders 037, 038 and 039.
Chango Orders 037 and 038 arc primarily electrical in content.
They aro relatively minor changes having to do with same ad-
ditional wiring, receptacles and fixtures. he is noted in
the lettere to the Laurence Company from OSM, change order 037
reflects an addition of a 4 way switch and the necessary con-
duit and wire that will be in Stair A in the intermediate
landing. It also includes in the operators roan, 3 additional
receptacles on the north, south and oast wells including again,
the conduit wiring and circuiting. There is a rewiring proposed
for the existing water heater in the lavatory and finally, both
a removal and a replacement of lighting fixtures within the
existing lavatories.
- 7 -
C
Council Agenda - 6/14/82
Change Order 038 provides for the installation of exterior
lighting at the doors of the control building and at the
aeration/blower room building. There are also revisions
to bring sufficient power to the standby emergency generator
auxilary equipment. The first two parts of Change Order 038
are simple installation of exterior lighting and the approp-
riate switches on the inside of the affected buildings. The
third part of Change order 038 deals with the control wiring
for motors M1, M2 and M3, and motor N91. The fourth part of
Change Order 038 is the creation of circuits for the standby
generator engine heaters and battery charger. The directions
read that they are to use the remaining spare 20 amp circuits
available and to install new 20 amp circuit breakers for each
new spare circuit as required.
Change Order 039, I think, is best explained in the letter
from OSM to the Laurence Company. It gives a fairly detailed
account of what happened and what should be done to accommo-
date it, a description of which I would only repeat in this
portion of the supplement.
III Consideration of rnnlovee Assintancr_ Program and Overall
Personnel Policy Revisions.
A9 a result of the ongoing union negotiations, I have care-
fully gone over the existing city personnel policy as wall
as the employee assistance policy which is a part of the
overall policy. It is my opinion that certain portions of
the policy aro vary inadequate. Relative to the employee
assistance program, it is little more than a policy statement
that states the City's concern over personnel well being and
that the City will hall) when it can. In the past years, the
City to implement this program, has had a working relationship
with the Minnesota Growth Exchange. In pursuing this existing
agreement, I find that the Minnesota Growth Exchange ties boon
dissolved and no longer exists. As a result, I have approached
people from the Abbott Northwestern hospital system to help in
the preparation of a comprehensive poreonnol policy and employee
assistance policy which would provide also the implementation
of the EAP. I have mat with Mr. Dan Roo of the Abbott North-
western Hospital systems to discuss this and lie indicated that
he would be very happy to work on such a program, and in fact,
carry through to the implementation stages. By implementation
stages, what I moan is that the Abbott Northwestern staff would
also be available for all forms of consultation that would not
be charged to the employee or any other city personnel who
choose to use it. We have not, at this time, prepared any do -
tells except in preliminary discussion form. Basically, Mr.
Roo sulmittod to me a proposal that the City of Monticello
and Abbott Northwestern Hospital systema enter into an agree-
ment for a $1,000.00 annual fee which would provide initially
for the creation of the overall poreonnol policy including the
- 8 -
Council Agenda - 6/14/82
It
EAP; would provide a series of training sessions for super-
visory personnel on how to identify the problems connected
with a troubled employee; would provide training sessions
for all personnel on how to effectively use the City's
EAP in their personal lives; would provide free of charge
to the employee first session consultation with an EAP
specialist; would provide free of charge to the employee
the first session with the specialist recommended by the EAP
consultant; would provide occasional informational sessions
for employees on a varying range of topics; would provide
for an annual update of the EAP and the overall personnel
policy; would provide the necessary legal background to in-
sure that the policies comply with all state and federal
employee regulations.
I strongly recommend that we enter the agreement. I am
familiar with the quality of work performed by the Abbott
Northwestern Hospital's sytem, and rate them as excellent.
I also feel very strongly that the existence of both a
quality personnel policy and a quality EAP is of direct
benefit to the City as well as the employee. The agreement
with the Minnesota Growth Exchange that the City has had in
tho past, has an arrrox--atc coat cf :200 tc :100; however,
the agreement accommodated nothing more than a referral
service by EAP personnel at the growth exchange. It is my
estimation that for the dollar amount, we would be receiving
for greater service from the Abbott Northwestern system. If we
proceed with a rewrite of all personnel policy matters, I
anticipate the entire program to be ready for council adoption
by the first meeting in August. I am requesting that you take
affirmative action on this at the Juno 14th meeting.
I) Adjourn.
A
- 9 -
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - M014TICELLO CITY COUNCIL
.� May 24, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Phil White, Ken Maus,
Dan Blonigen.
Members Absent: None.
I. Call To Order.
A. Approval of the Minutes. A motion was made by Fair, second-
ed by Blonigen and unanimously carried to approve the minutes
of the regular council meeting held May 10th, 1982.
II. Unfininhed Business.
A. Consideration of Alternate Proposals on City Maintenance
Building.
Previously, bids were received by the City for the construc-
tion of a new pole building at the maintenance property site
with the low bid being $19,324 from Menard's Inc. and the
next lowest bidder being Lester's Inc. in the amount of
$19,368.
Council member Blonigen had concerns that the building was
over specified and similar type haildings could be built for
much loss and submitted to the Council a comparative bid
sheet indicating that a similar building could be built for
approximately $1,547 less, than the low bid received if the
building was built not to be insulated in the future. Mr.
Blonigen also noted that although the dollar difference is
not that largo, he felt that the City may still eventually
spend $10,000 more when the building is completed and fully
insulated to the Public works Department's requirements and
as a result, maybe the City should be looking at adding an
additional stall to the present concrete maintenance build-
ing instead. Although the Public Works Director agreed that
an additional atoll to the concrete building would to prefer-
able, the estimated coat would probably be two or three
times as much as a separate polo building.
Mayor Crimsmo noted that comments have been mado to him
from other builders and other building inspectors that
possibly the City would be getting a bettor value for its
money by building a Looter's building versus a Monard's
building as better materials would be used by motor's Inc.
Mayor Crimomo noted problems that the City of Becker has
tied with Menard's buildingo in regard to warping of the
lumber, otc. Councilmen Blonigon also noted that in his
experience as a building contractor. Monard's materials
Council Minutes - 5/24/82
appeared to be less than desirable in regard to moistuze
"{ content etc. resulting in shrinkage etc. of the lumber.
Loren Klein, City Building Inspector, also agreed that in
his opinion, it would be in the City's best interest to
award the contract to Lester's based on quality of ma-
terials provided and better anchoring of poles to footings.
It was Mr. Grimsmo's recommendation that the bid be award-
ed to Lester's Inc. for the additional cost of $44.00 over
the low bid of Menard's.
A motion was made by White, seconded by Maus to award the
contract for the construction of a pole building at the
maintenance garage to Lester's Inc. of Lester Prairie in
the base bid amount of $19,368.00. Voting in favor was
White, Maus, Fair and Grimsmo with Blonigen opposing the
motion because it was still his opinion that a different
type of building should be built and the opposition to
the motion was not meant to be supporting Menard's low
bid over Lester's Inc.
B. Consideration of Appraisal of 15 feet of Chestnut Street
as per vacation Request.
At the previous Council meeting, Mr. Paul Lutzko of 824
West Broadway petitioned the City of Monticello requesting
that a portion of Chestnut Street lying adjacent to his
property be vacated to allow him to build a double garage
on a portion of the vacated street. No action was taken
by the Council at the previous meeting regarding vacation
to allow an appraisal to be obtained on the value of the
cast 15 foot portion.
An appraisal of the estimated value of the street to be
vacated was obtained from Mr. John Sandberg of Sandberg
Roalty who estimated the value between $500 and $1,000
for the 15 foot by 165 foot parcel depending on the cost
to the city for the transforring of those parcels to the
adjoining property owners.
The Council eoneensus was that unless the value of the
property was sufficient to justify vacating, it may be
in the boat interest of the City not to vacate the pro-
porty.
As a result, a motion was made White, seconded by Fair
and unanimously carried to approve vacating the oast 15
foot of Chestnut Street between Broadway and 3rd Strout
- 2 -
N
Council Minutes - 5/24/82
and to offer each 15 by 165 foot parcel to the abutting
y'i property owners at a cost of $750 each with the offer
being good until December 1, 1982 for purchase.
C. Report on Cost Related to Replacement of Man Hole at
intersection of Hwys 75 and 25.
Public Works Director, John Simola, reviewed with the
Council quotes he has received for the repair of the man
hole located at the intersection of Hwy 25 and 75. Mr.
Simola noted that two major contractors he has contacted
have indicated that they would only quote the job based
on time and materials and have estimated the cost at about
$10,000 due to its difficult location.
The only quote received so far was from Utilities Services
Company which estimated the cost at $4,950. Mr. Simola
noted that this company has previously repaired a man hole
along Hwy 25 and did do an adequate job.
As a result, a notion was made by Blonigon seconded by
Maus and unanimously carried to authorize the Public Works
_ Director to enter into an agreement with Utilities Service
Company in the amount of $4,950 for the repair and replace-
ment of the existing manhole at the intersection of Hwy 75
and State Hwy 25.
New Buaineae.
A. Consideration of Change Orders 034, 035 and 03G for the
Wastowator Treatment Plant.
Threo additional change orders on the construction at the
Wastewater Troatment Plant with the Paul A. Laurence
Company hava been recommended by the city engineer and city
staff as follows:
034 - Replacement of material only on the sludge collect-
ing mochanismo in the oxisting final clarifier for
an additional amount of $12,543.00.
035 - Adjustment of unit pricon on quantities for curb
and guttor and bituminous street ourfacing to
accomaodato a rovielon of bituminous curb to con-
crete curb and guttor. No exact dollar change at
present time.
036 - The relocation of gas scrubber and purification
C cyotem into a now ooparato housing structuro to
comply with safety roquiremonts of tho state
building codo, an additional 912,588.
Council Minutes - 5/24/02
On
J
A motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by White and
unanimously carried to approve change orders 034 through
036 in the amount of $25,131.00 on the Wastewater Treat-
ment Plant construction project with the Paul A. Laurence
Company, the general contractor.
B. Continuation of Public Nearing - Vacation of the Westerly
15 feet of City Easement Lying Over Vacated Cedar Street.
Mr. Willard Murphy, owner of Americ-Inn, appeared previous-
ly before the Planning Commission to request a vacation of
the westerly 15 feet of the city easement which lies over
Coda Street which was previously vacated on February 25th,
1980 and sold to Mr. Murphy and the V.F.W. Club in March of
of 1981. Mr. Murphy would like to be able to use a portion
of the vacated street for his proposed motel to be situated
on. The proposal calls for the building to be situated
approximately 7 feet over into the vacated portion of the
street which currently has casement rights by the City,
NSP and Bridgewater Telephone Company. In order to allow
this, the City would have to release the easement rights
pvnr Llw portion of the str,:cL :hat the 1:,.ilding :.Gus
situated on and Northern States Power Company has indicated
that they would have no problem with releasing the casement
rights up to 25 feat of the cast portion of the street.
Bridgewater Telephone Company has indicated that they do
presently have a telephone pad located in the cast 15
foot of the vacated street and would be willing to only
release the casement over the portion of the street that
the building would actually be situated on plus an allow-
ance for the building drip line at the present time and in
the future would not object to releasing their easement
rights over the entire easterly 15 foot of the street onto
they have moved their telephone pad.
It was noted by the Building Inspector, Loren Klein, that
letters from NSP and Bridgewater Telephone Company indicat-
ing their agreement with the releasing of the casements will
be forth coming and as a result, a motion was made by White,
seconded by Blonigen and unanimously carried to approve
vacating the easements over the approximate 7 foot area that
the building proposed by the motel will be located on, legal
description as follows
c. Review of Liquor Store Quarterly Report.
Liquor Store Manager, Mark Irmiter, reviewed with the
Council the results of the first quarter operation and
financial report. Total sales for the first quarter
of 1982 increased approximately $6,000 over the same
period last year and the resulting gross profit in-
candaeu npp:csi:.atcly 45.700 resulti^0 in e gro_c
profit percentage of almost 21%. Operating income
rose to $9,900 versus $5,900 the previous year.
it was noted by Mr. Irmiter that traditionally the
first quartor is the slower quarter of the year and
he expects the balance of the year to chow continued
good results.
A motion was mado by Fair, seconded by Maua and unani-
mously carried to accept the first quarter liquor store
report as proosnted.
D. Approval of the Bills for the Month of May.
A motion woo made by Blonigen, seconded by Fair and
unanimously carried to approve the bills for the month
of May, 1982 as presented. (Soo Exhibit 01).
E. Review of Preliminary Visibility Report on Wideninj
7th Stroot Between Hwy 25 said Cedar Street.
John Badalich, City Engineer, presented to the Council
Dome proliminary cost ostimatoo for improving 7th Street
5 -
Council Minutes - 5/24/82
Beginning at the northeasterly corner of Lot 6 -
9 9
Block 3: thence southwesterly along the easterly
line of Lot 6 - Block 3 for a distance of 130.0
feet: thence easterly 90 degrees from the easterly
line of said Lot 6 - Block 3, a distance of 18.0
feet: thence southwesterly parallel to the easter-
ly line of said Lot 6 - Block 3, a distance of 165.0
feet: thence westerly 90 degrees to the easterly
line of said Lot 6 - Block 3, a distance of 18.0
feet to the easterly line of said Loc 6 - Block 3:
thence northwesterly along the easterly line of
said Lot 6 - Block 3, a distance of 315.0 feet
to the point of beginning.
c. Review of Liquor Store Quarterly Report.
Liquor Store Manager, Mark Irmiter, reviewed with the
Council the results of the first quarter operation and
financial report. Total sales for the first quarter
of 1982 increased approximately $6,000 over the same
period last year and the resulting gross profit in-
candaeu npp:csi:.atcly 45.700 resulti^0 in e gro_c
profit percentage of almost 21%. Operating income
rose to $9,900 versus $5,900 the previous year.
it was noted by Mr. Irmiter that traditionally the
first quartor is the slower quarter of the year and
he expects the balance of the year to chow continued
good results.
A motion was mado by Fair, seconded by Maua and unani-
mously carried to accept the first quarter liquor store
report as proosnted.
D. Approval of the Bills for the Month of May.
A motion woo made by Blonigen, seconded by Fair and
unanimously carried to approve the bills for the month
of May, 1982 as presented. (Soo Exhibit 01).
E. Review of Preliminary Visibility Report on Wideninj
7th Stroot Between Hwy 25 said Cedar Street.
John Badalich, City Engineer, presented to the Council
Dome proliminary cost ostimatoo for improving 7th Street
5 -
Council Minutes - 5/24/82
between Hwy 25 and Cedar Street with bituminous surfacing
and curb and gutter. A number of alternatives were dis-
cussed as follows:
- A 44 foot street with curb and gutter on center
line was estimated at $48,285.00 with a concrete
retaining wall and $38,385.00 with a timberwood
retaining wall.
- A 44 foot street with curb and gutter 10 feet
south of center line with a concrete retaining
wall at $36,585.00 and $33,285.00 with a timber -
wood retaining wall.
- A 44 foot wide street with a 5 foot shoulder on
center line was estimated at $43,610.00 with a
concrete retaining wall and $33,710.00 with a
timberwood retaining wall.
- A 40 foot wide street with 5 foot shoulders
located 10 foot south of center lino was estimated
at $31,910.00 will o Vunel utu relaiuiuy -11 ,,J
$28,610.00 with a timberwood retaining wall.
In reviewing the alternates available, it was recommended
by the City Engineer and also the concenaus of the Council
that the improvement of 7th Street should be moved at
least 10 foot to the south in order to reduce the cost
associated with the retaining wall near the cemetery. In
addition, the two property owners located on tho south
side of 7th Street, namely Perkins Restaurant and W.J.
Murphy, have indicated they would like to see the street
improved with curb and gutter and a petition will be forth-
coming from the property owners requesting the improvement.
As a result, a motion was made by Maus, seconded by White
and unanimously carried to authorito the City Engineer to
draw up plans and specifications with the alternates pro-
sentod and prepare a report on the estimated aseoasment
coot to the affected property owners.
Moc g Adjourned.
Rick Wolfatol or
Y
Assistant Administrator
6
RESOLUTION REIATING TO DOCKET #AB -61 SUB. NO. 119F
Resolution Opposing the Proposed Abandonment of
Railroad Line from Rogers to Monticello
wHEREAS, Burlington Northern Railraod has initiated
action to abandon a section of their railroad line
running from Rogers, Minnesota, to Monticello,
Minnesota; and
1:111EREAS, the City Council of Monticello, wishing to
act in the beet interest of the people of Monticello,
held a hearing for the purpose of receiving public
co--acnt; and
WHEREAS, it is the expressed opinion of the City Council
that the abandonment of said railroad line would be a
detriment to community well being.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COU14CIL OF THE
CITY OF MONTICELLO THAT:
1) The proposed abandonment of the Burlington
Northern Railroad line from Rogers to Monti-
cello is hereby opposed.
2) The City Administrator io directed to submit
to all relevant agencies a letter expressing
the City's opposition.
3) The City of Monticello shall lend its support
to other public and private agencies which are
in opposition to the abandonment in an effort
to present o united position.
Adopted by the Council this 14th day of Juno, 1902.
Arvo A. Grimamo
ATTEST s
C
Thomas A. Eiden
City Administrator
M
RESOLUTION RELATING TO DOCKET NAB -61 SUB. NO. 119F
Resolution Endorsing the Proposed Abandonment by
Burlington Northern Railroad of the Rogers to
Monticello Line.
WHEREAS, Burlington Northern Railroad has initiated
action to abandon a section of their railroad line
running from Rogers, Minnesota, to Monticello,
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Monticello, wishing to
act in the best interest of the people of Monticello,
hold a hearing for public co=ent; and
WHEREAS, it is the expressed opinion of the City
Council that the abar;donment of said railroad would
not be a detriment to the community's well being.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL O: -.112
CITY OF MONTICELLO THAT Burlington Northern Railroad
be supported in its efforts to abandon the Rogers to
Monticello line, and that no objections be filed on
behalf of the City.
Adopted this 14th day of Juno, 1982.
Arvo A. Grimsmo
Mayor of Monticello
ATTESTS
Thomas A. Eidem
City Administrator
JE, W
Minnesota
Bob McEachemDistrict 18B House of
Wright -Sherburne
_ Representatives
\'(1 commCommltteea:
Education
School Aide Division, Mary A. sIaWn. Jr., spe"
Chairman.
Health and Welfare
Local and Urban Affairs
Joint Committee on Libraries May 20, 1982
Deputy Director
Section of Finance
Roar 5417
Interstate Commerce Commission
Washington, D.C. 20423
RE: AB -6 (Sub -No. 119F)
Dear Sir:
I am writing to let you know ttuat I strongly oppose the abrudomlent of the
Burlington Northern Railroad line. I have been working in the Minnesota Legis-
lature to approp:iatc n= --y to candu:t a sti-dy of light real transit bct,:.•ccn
Minneapolis and St. Cloud, Minnesota and this is the line that we are using
for that study. We hope that in the rear future we will be able to have a
light rail system set up using that line.
Ilse abandonnent would be detrimental to our stud and to the people who live
in the area who are patiently waiting to get lilt rail transit from St. Cloud
to Minneapolis, the fastest growing area in the State of Minnesota.
I appreciate your consideration.
Sincerely,
BMc/nuc
teaeutaotnc� ^ _
a01 fM.111 WHarL e•
Bob McEaehem
State Representative
O��NNESpT.
�4inncsota
Department of Transportation
Transportation 13LIdding
F St. Paul, NlinneSota 55155
4r OF 7P0
May 19, 1982 , i,,,,,,• (612) 296-1611
Rail Users and Other Interested Parties
Re: Notice of Intent to Abandon
Burlington Northern's Rogers to Monticello
line, in Hennepin 6 Wright Counties, Minnesota
The Minnesota Department of Transportation has received notification
from BN that on or about May 28, 1982, it intends to file with the
ICC an application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and
necessity permitting, the abandonment of its Rogers to Monticello line.
The lire extends from Milepost 21.15, near Rogers, to Milepost 38.29
at the end of the line near Monticello, a distance of 17.14 miles.
Thin distance includes the stations at Albertville and Monticello.
The ICC will determine if rail service should continue on the line.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation will be participating, in
this proceeding. If you have special comments regarding, your trans-
portation needs or community's concerns relating to this rail aban-
donment, I would appreciate hearing from you within the next two
weeks. Please direct your comments to me as follows:
Isaac McCrary, Jr.
Mn/DOT
Room 820, Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
612-296-1611
In the event the abandonment occurs, the right-of-way may be acquired
for public use. If you are a local or state unit of government, in-
dicate your interest in writing to the Interstate Commerce Commission,
12th and Constitution Avenue, Northwest, Washington. D.C. 204-23.
Public use statements and other written comments must indicate the
proceedine Docket No. AB -61 (Sub. No. 119F) and must be filed with the
ICC no later than .June 28, 1982.
Adjacent landowners along the railroad right-of-way wanting to buy a
portion of the railroad property may indicate their interest to the
railroad at the following name and address,
Douglass J. Babb
Law Department
Burlington Northern Railroad Company
176 East Pifth Street
St. Paul, Minnesota. 55101
�, A
,4. r9_1 Ilppn.(..iq n..wpiny.
.JM)b$'
Rail Users & Other Interested Parties
May 19. 1982
Page Two.
If you have any further questions regarding this abandonment pro-
ceeding, feel free to call or write me.
Sincerely.
.!!
Isaac McCrary. Jr.
Rail Abandonment Coordinator
Rail Planning Unit
C
�A
0111te al 9w
Cay Admmuvator
C. -ty of Monficelk
Plow: 16121295.2711
Moue', 16121333.5739
June 2, 1982
Interstatacommerce CtSIMIission
12th i Constitution Ava. B.N.
Nashington, D. C. 20023
Res Docket No. A8-fil(Sub. No. 119P).
In rospcnee to the May 19th, 1902 Minnesota Department of Trans-
portation Notice of Intent to Abandon, I am contacting you to
express the City of Monticallo's interest in acquiring the
right-of-way petitioned for abandonment in the above referenced
docket. While the City,at thin point, has taken no official
pooition on the request to abandon, it does wish to go on record
that in this event that abandonment is granted, the City in in-
eorescad in the acquisition of the right-of-way. The City of
Monticallo's Comprehensive Plan indicates that in the long run,
if the railroad were to abandon said right-of-way, the property
under lying could be developed as a bicycle trail and perhaps,
croas country ski -snowmobile type trail.
Planes contact me at the address below it additional infornmtion
is required.
Very truly yours,
6kWj_
Thomas A. Zidam
City Administrator
TAL/mh
cc 1 CA
John Dondhus
250 ED!" --IV a f1t. a, 001 83A is Monticotto. MN 55362
Orly
7
oI /I'/on�icA
Office of w
Pho-: 168:21 295.27::
Cay Ado n L'efo:
Metro le:2f 333.5139
C.
June 3, 1982
Mr. Tom Ehlinger
Burlington Northern Railroad
IAw Department
176 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN. 55101
Dear Mr. Ehlinger:
This latter is a follow up to our phone conversation of June 3rd,
1962 when I requested your attendance at the June 14th, 1987
Monticello City Council meeting to discuss the Notice of Intent
to Abandon Burlington Northern's Rogers to Monticello line
(Docket IAB -61 Sub. go. 119P). While it is my understanding
that the main purpose of your visit will be to provide informa-
tion to the City Council and staff, there may be members of the
public present who wish to address Questions to you. Also, as
I mentioned on the phone, we will be inviting HWDOT rapresenta-
tivo Isaac McCrary, Jr. to attend the meeting.
I have enclosed a map of the City showing directions to the
Monticello City offices. my intention is to place you very
early on the meeting agenda, a copy of which I will be sending
you as the mooting time neare.
Very truly yours,
Therms A. Bid em
City Administrator
TAE/mh /
cc: CA
250 E: idw9y a At. 4. Box 83A 9 Monttoetlo. MN 55302
1
T.10phom 23S471 1 M.vo 4�. 73]•5777
6-1,u 4 KnficA
2 Esit Broadway J
Route 4, Box 83A
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
June 3, 1982
The Honorable Bob MOEacharn
State Representative
601 North Walnut
St. Michael, MN. 55776
Doer Representative MOEachern7
This letter is to confirm my phone request that you attend the
June 14th, 1982 Monticello City Council meeting to discuss the
proposed abandonment of the Burlington Northern Railroad lino.
As I mentioned in our conversation, Mr. Isaac McCrary, Jr. of
MN/DOT is planning to be present at the meeting to answer
questions and provide additional information on the proposed
abandonment. While our intent to have this meeting is primari-
ly one for gaining information, I suspect there may be membere
of the public who will be presont to express their opinions.
I will be sending you a copy of our meeting agenda as the meet-
ing date nears. Please feel free to contact me it you have any
questions prior to that time.
Very truly yours. o
Thomas A. Eidom
City Administrator
TAE/mh
cc i CA'�
McCrary, M11/D0T
Wo1com• InIic*110 . . . Cill[i mountain -'
l
t•4pho.x 395•]7 t i ��?7
C,ifc� onfice��
2Y�'/lEar�/)/)t Broadway
Route 4, Box 83A
MONTICELLO, MN 56362
June 2, 1982
Mr. Isaac McCrary, Jr.
Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Room 820
Transportation Building
St. Paul, MN. 55155
Doer Mr. McCrary, Jri
This letter is a follow up to our phone conversation of June 2,
1982 when I requested your attendance at the June 10th, 1982
Monticello City Council meeting -to discuss the Notice of Intent
to Abandon Burlington Northern'• Rogers to Monticello line
{Docket IFAB-61 Sub. No. 119F}. While it is my understanding
that the main purpose of your visit will be to provide informa-
tion to the City Council and staff, there maybe members of the
public present who wish to address questions to you. Also, as
I mentioned on the phone, we will be inviting Kinnesota Repre-
sentative Bob Mcfeachern to attend the meeting.
I have enclosed a map of the City shoving directions to the
Monticello City offices. My attention is to place you very
early on the meeting agenda, a copy of which I will be sanding
-you as the meeting time nears.
va4.g truly your#,
Thomas A. 814am
City Administrator
TWmh
cc i CA'r
Bob McEachorn
It
COI1t0 !to
.. A_
rn�p0 . • • RU�I u►toanialso
Mena Lt.. 333.5739
RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION
AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
1. A petition requesting the improvement of 7th Street between
trunk Hwy 25 and Lauring Lane filed with the Council on
June 14th. 1982, is hereby declared to be signed by the re-
quired percentage of owners of property affected thereby.
:his declaration is Lade in conformity to Minnesota
Statutes Section, 429.035.
2. The petition is hereby referred to OSM and they are in-
structed to report to the Council with all convenience
speed, advising the Council in a preliminary way as to
whether the proposed improvement is feasible, and as to
whether it should be made as proposed or in connection
with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of
the improvement as recommended.
Adopted by the Council this 14th day of June, 1982.
ATTEST,
Thomas A. Cidsm
City Administrator
Arve A. Grimamo
Mayor of Monticello
r
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS
WHEREAS, a certain petition requesting the improvement of
7th Street between trunk Hwy 25 and Inuring Lane was duly
presented to the Council on the 14th day of June, 1982;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the resolution of the Council adopted
June 14th, 1982, a report has been prepared by OSM with
reference to the improvement, and this report was received
by the Council on June Atli, 1982#
NOW THEREFORE, 9E IT RESOLVED 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF MON^aICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Council defines and determines that said petition was
signed by all owners of real estate property abutting upon
the streets named as the location of the improvement.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the
( Ctl.^. i l rcz*o1utjv-% ca.,,.tee Juno 14th, 1982.
3. OSM is hereby designated as the engineer for this improve-
mont. They shall prepare plans and specifications for the
making of such improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 14th day of June, 1982.
ATTEST:
Thomas A. Eidcm
City Administrator
Arvo A. Grimamo
Mayor of Monticello
a
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on
June 14th, 1982, OSM has prepared plans and specifications
for the improvement of 7th Street between trunk Hwy 25 and
Lauring Lane by constructing a permanent street with concrete
curb and gutter and has presented such plans and specifications
to the Council for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA,
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Administrator shall propare and cause to be inserted
in the official newspaper and in an appropriate construction
magazine, an advertisament for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications.
Tho advcrtisncnt shall be published for (a) days, shell
specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be
opened (Time)
on July , 1982, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by
the City Administrator and City Engineer, will then be tabu-
lated, and will be considered by the Council at (Time)
on July , 1982, in the Council Chambers, and that no bids
will be considered unless sealed and filed with the adminis-
trator and the company by a cash deposit, cashier's check,
bid bond or certified check payable to the administrator for
5% of the amount of ouch bid.
ATTEST,
Thomas A. Sidem
City Administrator
Arve A. Grimsmo
Mayor of Monticello
M",
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
P.O. Btu 416
713 Wn1 8-1-"
Monticatio• Mlnm is 55762
JAMES G. METCALF
BRADLEY V. LARSON
June 1, 1982
City of Monticello
Monticello City Hall
250 E. Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
ATTN: City Administrator
RE: Front Street Neighbors
Dear Tom:
TELEPHONE
16121 2953232
METRO
19121 Q1 3393
I have been contacted by several neighbors who
live on Front Street in regard to the recent malfunction
of the sanitary sewer lift pump station which caused excessive
flooding in basements of quite a number of homes in the neighbor-
hood. The most recent incident that occurred last week would
appear to be the third or fourth time this has occurred within
the recent memory of the residents. Obviously this is a sanitary
sCwei Lacnup aid it Is messy and it smells. In the past the City
S_ has had insuranco coverage, but the Public works Director has
contacted a number of the neighbors and indicated that there was
a ppseibility of no insurance coverage. The normal homeowner's
insurance does not cover sewer backup as has been confirmed by
several of the homeowners checking with their home insurance
carriers. It is my understanding that the problem started on
Monday with a malfunction and that parts were ordered for the lift,
but did not come until later in the week, when the flooding occurred.
The residents are extremely upset that they had no forewarning, as a
result of which they could have taken preventive measures to mitigate
the damage done to their homes. Many of these homes have finished
basements with carpeting and furniture, and a little preventive warning
would have gone a long way.
I
It is of concern to me that at least one of the residents
listed below is elderly, cannot negotiate stairs, and has no means
to clean up the mess created. I haveinstructed the residents to
keep track of the time involved in the cleanup and any expenses that
they do incur so that they can present an accounting to the City or
its insuranco carrier.
Lastly, I would hereby request on the part of the Front
street neighbors that they be placed on the agendafor the City Council
Meeting on the 14th so that they may express their further concerns
to you at that time.
TT -
City of Monticello
Attn: City Administrator -2- June 1, 1482
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
METCALF 6 LA ON
BVL:dms I
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Ronald Thimmesh
312 W. Front Street
Monticello, Minnesota $5362
Mr. and Mrs. Jeff Schviettering
324 W. Front Street
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Mr. Ken LaBau
1 Locust
Monticello. Minnesota 55362
Mr. and Mrs. Norbert Kelly; Jr.
301 W. Front Street
Monticello, Minnesota55362
Mr. and Mrs. Richard E. Carlson
225 W. Front Street "=
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Mr. and Mrs. Kevin Jendro'
2 Locust Street
Monticello, Minnesota•=•55362
Mr. and Mrs. Allan•Schleif
3 Walnut Street -
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Ms. Olive Christianson
Mr. Dave Soa®erfeld
17421 130th Ave. North
Dayton, Minnesota 55327
0'1" of the
Cdy Admit slratp
C-fcy of //'/onfice&
June 3, 1982
Dear Front Street Resident:
Wr000 I612) 295.2711
W UO: 16 12) 3335739
I am contacting you at this time to inform you on what stops
the City is taking to resolve the problems that resulted from
our lift station failure. On Wednesday morning, Juno 2nd, 1982,
1 triad to contact each of you personally at your homes to ex-
plain our plan. For those of you Gnat I managed to catch at
home, this lector may be repetitious. For those of you that I
missed, I hope this will give you the information you need.
What I am requesting from each of you is that you submit to me
a claim for damages done to your property. Please include your
labor, out ,of pocket expense related to clean up, and approxi -
mato replacement cost'foi,damaged goods and personal property.
When I have received all individual claims, I will be submit-
ting a single composite claim, on your bohalf, to our insurance
company. I cannot, at this time,,quarantee that our insurance
coverage will honor the claim. ,1 have discussed this matter
with our agent, and he thinks that the circumstances might be
ouch that the claim will be paid. He. however, is also unable
to predict how the company will view the claim after they have
investigated.
Part of the difficulty with this particular claim is that the
failure was not a result of negligence or natural disaster, ouch
as a lightning strike. Our agent's initial response was that
the claim would be disallowed. Aftor explaining the situation
with pump 02 being out of commission, and what that moans to the
overall oporation, he said that that might make a difference.
Thus, we are happy to submit a claim on your behalf.
_07�_6
25r -nst Broadway 9 Rt •. Box 83A s Monticello, MN 55362
Front Street Resident
June 3, lge2
Page 42
R
The City genuinely regrets the serious inconvenience each of you
have bean caused, and I vent you'to know that we will be as co-
operative as we can. While it is too late to prevent this mis-
hap. I do wish to reiterate Mr. Simola's earlier recommendation
that back water valves be installed. The installation of such a
valve will prevent problems in the future if the lift station
should again fail.
Finally, as soon as you determine the extent of damage, and file
a claim with me, I will in turn file a claim with our insurance
carrier. Then, as soon as I hoar what the company's determination
is, I will notify each of you. If they do not allow the claim,
you may than choose to come before the Council.
Please feel free to contact me if I can give you additional in-
formation.
Very truly yours:
Thomas A. Eidem
City Administrator
P.S. I have just received a letter from Metcalf 6 Larson, Attorneys
at Law, relaying your roquest to appear before the Council
on Juno 14th. I will be glad to designate space on that
agenda so that representatives of your neighborhood may tomo
before the Council. A copy of the final agenda will be sent
to each of you as the date of the meeting nears.
cci J. Franzen
Metcalf a Larson
John Simola
Ltfc� 01 monfice[[o
1
010c• 01 tM �•^• 16t 71 283.77 t 1
Cny A•mU"Ifetol Ye•ef 16121 ]3.57]8
June 3, 1982
Mr. Brad Lorean
Attorney at lar
P.O. Box 446
Monticello, MN. 55362
Dear Bradt
The attached letter was sent to the following residents)
Mr. t Mrs. Ronald Thimmesh
Mr. c Mrs. Jeff Schwiottaring
312 West Front Street
324 West Front Street
P.O. Box 112
P.O. Box 273
Monticello, MN. 55362
Monticello, MN. 55362
Mr. c Kra. Norbert Kelly, Jr.
Kr. Ken Labau
301 West Front Street
1 Locust
Rt 4, P.O. Box 219A
Rt 4. P.O. Box 252
Monticello, MN. 55362
Monticello, MN. 55362
Mr. c Kra. Richard Z. Carlson
Mr. i Mrs. Kevin Jendro
225 West Front Street
2 Locust Street
P.O. Box 251
Rt 4. P.O. box 220
Monticello, MN. 55362
Monticello, MN. 55362
Ms. Olive Christiansen
Mr. Dave sommorleld
Rt. 4. P.O. Box 216
17421 130th Ave. North
Monticello, KN. $5362
Dayton, MN. 55327
It you have any Questions in regard to this matter, ploase call
me at your convenience.
very truly yours,
C__
Therms A. 6idem
' City Administrator
TAE/mh
cc CA
�!• St. 4. Box 83A • Monllcallo, MN 55362
May 27, 1982 -- Lift Station E2
6:00 P. M. Received a call on pager from unknown woman at Front
Street that the sewer was backing up in her basement.
The Mayor and I were in Ellison Park at the time and
immediately proceeded to the Bridge Park lift station.
Pump it was turned off and pump 02 had a tripped
breaker. The red light was on at the lift station
and was backing up. I sent Arvie to get Walt Mack while
I attempted to restart pumps. Pump Y1 would run but
had no effect on levels. Pump 02 would only kick off
the breakers.
6c15 P. M. Walt arrived and said $1 pump was down for valve repair
since Monday, May 24th. Me tried to restart 621 it
kicked the breaker. We pulled panel cover and saw
burnt control switch. I left to call an electrician.
6:25 P. M. I celled Milt and Mike Olson. I called Wright Cc
and asked them to cut off water usage. I called Sri
state for temporary pump station and emergency service.
6:40 P. M. I arrived back at Oita and electrician had pump 12
running again.
6:50 - 7:10 Ellison Park
7:10 P. M. Arrived back at station. Tarry E. from Tristate had
arrived and we discussad prcblc:. Dacicall;; c:•rith
failure could not have been detected prior to its
burning up. Cycle rates effect longevity of awith
gear. Will pull pump Y1 and resize tmpollor while
waiting for valva parts.
7:20 - 9 Surveyed damago to homes and apartments,
1. 4 apartments in building across from park - all floors
wet - 1 to 2" water (high level).
2. Jondro'e - 3" water (high level), carpet and shoot rock.
3. R. Carlson - wet floor, many mise. boxes, name throw rugs.
4. LaBau - water paneling only damage.
5. N. Kelly - wet floor, mise. boxes, high water was 2".
6. Thimmeah - 2" water or more high point, toys, mise. boxes,
some rugs wet.
7. Schwiortaring - much carpet wet, high water 2-3".
8. Moller - no damage - has back water valve.
I advised all persons of oleetricial switch failure.
Informed them that it is my opinion that the city was
not negligent. Told them again about the merits of
back water valves, and basically told them I would
filo a report and tried to calm everyone down.
John E. Simola
Public Works Director
JES/lnq r��11
May 28, 1992
Cs Monday the 24th of May, we
were checking the lift stations and
found that the check valve on 12
pump was broken. Malt and Matt
took it apart and had Warder
Parts. The part& have to come
from Alabama and will take 2 to
6 weeks to acme.
Malt Keck
PARKING AGREEMENT
This Agreement, dated December 26, 1980 between Samuel Properties 6
Construction Company, Inc., Monticello, Minnesota, owner of Lots 14 6 15, Block 34,
Townsite of Monticello, Monticello, Minnesota, party of the first part, and the
City of Monticello, a municipal corporation, party of the second part, is intended
to regulate the parking needs of the above stated property in compliance with
approval of the proposed uses of said property by the Monticello City Council
on October 27, 1980, at their regular meeting, as represented by party of the
first part.
Party of the first part hereby proposes a building of 7,958 square feet
on the hereto referenced property, with the following uses:
Restaurant
1,862
Square
Feet
Office Area
4,226
Square
Peet
Bathrooms 6 Mechanical
940
Square
Feet
Uncommitted (Retail or Office Area)
930
Square
Feet
TOTAL
7,958
Square
Feet
Party of the first part agrees that the restaurant portion shall not open
for business prior to 4:00 P.M. of each day without approval of the Monticello
City Council.
Party of the first part agrees that any change in the useage allocations
shall be approved by the Monticello City Council.
Party of the first part agrees to provide eight (8) off-street parking
spaces that are hardaurfaccA and striped in accordance with Monticello City
Ordinances.
Party of the first part agrees to be &encased for the remaining portion
of parking required in accordance with the formula established for Downtown
Parking which in based on the following:
A. One space required for each 300 square feet of floor area.
B. One space required for each full time employee and one-half space
required for each part time employee.
C. Credit granted for each parking space a property owner provides
on his own property that is properly striped and hardsurfaced.
J
'Z -
C
Ji PAGE 2
D. A distance factor multiplier is determined as follows:
A factor of 1 vac used if the property owner was in the same
block of improvement - that is, Block 34 or Block 52.
A distance factor of was used if a property owner was in a
Block that was adjacent to the Block of improvement - that is.
Blocks 35, 51 and 53.
A distance factor multiplier of was used for the remaining
Block - that is, Block 36
Formula is then as follows: (A • B - C) x D
Party of the second part agrees to issue a certificate of occupancy
after this Agreement has been executed and complied with, and all other appli-
cable City and State codes adhered to.
Any violation of this Agreement by the party of the first part will
result in the revocation of a certificate of occupancy by party of the
second part.
This Agreement shall be binding upon the party of the first part and
all subsequent property owners of heretofore referenced property. Party of
the first part shall cause the following covenant to be recorded on said
property:
Building shall not exceed 7,958 square feet and shall
contain useages not to exceed the following:
*Restaurant 1,862 Square Feet
Offices 4,226 Square Feet
Bathrooms 6 Mechanical Area 940 Square Peet
Uncomitted Area (retail or office) 930 Square Feet
TOTAL 7,958 Square Peet
*Note: Restaurant may not open for business until after 4:00 P.M.
each day.
4"!X)'-�-
W fe b 9f,
AdmiKistrator
Arva A. Grimemo, Mayor
(SEAL)
,l'
fix,,
rmetdent, Be al Properties 6
Construction Company, Inc.
RESOLUTION DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON
MANUFACTURED HOUSING
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has enacted legislation regu-
lating discrimination against manufactured homes in areae
where they can meet the existing zoning requirements of a
community; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council of Monticello,
Minnesota to exercise their right to control the growth of the
City through zoning; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City's zoning ordinance to
ensure a quality dwelling environment; and
WHEREAS, the existing zoning ordinance requires amending in
order to comply with both State Legislatures, rulings and the
City's stated goals.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, that a moratorium in hereby placed
upon the granting of all building permits for the placiny ui
manufactured housing within the corporate limits of Monticello,
and that said moratorium shall be effective for a period commenc-
ing with the adoption of this resolution and ending 45 days hence.
Adopted by the Council this 14th day of Juno, 1982.
ATTEST:
Thomas A. Eidam
City Administrator
Arve A. Grimsmo
Mayor of Monticello
t
RESOLUTION DECLARING MORATORIUM ON
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello currently has a zoning ordinance
addressing a planned unit development (PUD) and the procedures
for the establishment of the same] and
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello maintains a constant effort to
improve all the ordinances in the best interest of the community
and good government; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined the present PUD ordinance
to be inadequate to eoct their requirements which would cr.suro
good government in the best interest of the community, and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to adopt a PUD ordinance which
will advance good government and enhance the environment of
the committee.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, that a moratorium in hereby declared on
the development of any new PUDs until the first day of Soptem-
bor 1, 1982 by which time a new PUD ordinance shall be adopted
which will better serve the goal of good government for the City
of Monticello.
Adopted by the Council this 14th day of June, 1982.
ATTESTe
CThomas A. Eidam
City Administrator
Arvo A. GrimamO
Mayor of Monticol).o
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER"as Issalle
e gerlre4
ORR•SCK=N•MAYERON S ASSOCIATES, INC.
eva+o• o. Naar cowshAHMrs..wc
Mart sett Mwwl►w
Avg sVnl qe rw.lemAt►, r'+eshtlAta share Im . neer .
.tractor Pn„t A ' t O.inpa Order No. 37
dress P.O. Box 1267. 10000 Mwv. 55 West data Nodif. No. 72
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55440 project No: 068-2748.01
b location ' Mionticello, MN' EPA grant Ib. C270855-03
accordance with the terse of your contract- dated - November 20 19 80 with
City of Monticello Oster for WWTP Upgrading 6 Alnrurtenant Work
„ era hereby requested to comply with the following cinef s from the contract plans and speclfications:
,mcriptlon and Justification: • Refer to vele Rodif 172 <MtaOidl
Upon review of the shop drawings, minor wiring revisione'vete required in the Main Control
building. This change order provides additional wiring, receptacles, finturee. etc. to
provide paver compatibility for the equipment and room occupancyri intended.
-eemdown of fy.ete Wie Change Orderm
.,Dor d material I Equipment � 1lrofit A Overhead � Total Add � Total Deduct
{subcontractor)
$660.00 gay Aaot nn
mount of Orlgleal contract. 1 4.704,000.00
Total Contract
.tract 'Mrs C.O. ri 36 Tout Addition Total Deduct Thra This C.O. d 37
54.806.724.07 $693.00 $4,807;417.07
rlglnal Conting9nc1os Q%1 1 141.200'00 -
Mt Remaining
ont. Thru C.O. I_„36 Add Ibis C.O. tourer This C.O. Cowfirvncies
$35.848.93 8693.00 $35.135.93
.here 1111 be an emferyloe of 0 dsys for completion.
the dare of the templet lea of Contract she October 28 . 19 82 sad eor rill M Oetoher 2R f9�`.
tccepted Dir Data kneed
Can orJ:N�
leut•maeead bT
1plaea .
Approved by ell . to owd
Paul A. Laurence Company RECEIVED
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
099-SCHELEN-G;.TECON i AS=.
P.O. 80. 1267 COMM.! 7 %V " -O)
10.000 High.sy 55 West
Minneapolis. MN 55"0 MAY 12 1982
Telephone 612/546.6911 P
✓
TL% 2907301
May 10, 1982
Orr-Schelen-Mayeron b Assoc., Inc.
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413
Attn: Mr. Gerald Corrick
Re: Wastewater Treatment Upgrading and Appurtenant Work
Monticello, Minnesota
EPA Project No. 0270855-03
Field Modification No. 72
Change Order Request No. 38
Gentlemen:
After reviewing Field Modification No. 72, dated January 12, 1982, for minor
electrical revisions in the main control building; we submit the following
price:
Subcontractor Material 8 Labor..............$660.00
General Contractor O.H. 8 P. - 55........... 33.00
Total, ....................................... $693.00
If the above figure meets with your favorable approval, please issue a change
order at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
PAUL A. LACE COMPANY .
erry Grundtner
Project Estimator
JG:jc
cc: Palco, Monticello, Minnesota
/ Job File
General File
su06104ry of a. J. Groves a eons company
Paul A. Lawence CelllpenY I. - ...d o00MWM1' en,pbrar
l�. 0 R•S NELEN•MAYERpN bAfiSOCUATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
Division of Kidde Consultants, Inc. 1
Land Surveyors
January 12, 1982
Paul A. Laurence Co.
P.O. Box 1267
10000 Highway 55 West
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440
Attn: Mr.' Jerry Grundtner -
Re: Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant
.Upgrading a Appurtenant Work
EPA Project No. C270855-03
Field Modification 172
Gentlemen:
Coordination with your electrical subcontractor during his
installation of electrical conduit in the Main Controi suilaing
has revealed some minor wiring inadequacies which were required
but inadvertently omitted on the drawings.
Please find below an itemised listing of the work which shall be
incorporated in to the project (Reference Drawing E-3).
1. Stair A, Intermediate Landinq, Near Door C11A
Provide all necessary conduit, vire, etc. for installation of
a.4 -way switch mounted on the east wall near the door.
Switch shall be connected•to overhead wall mounted conduit
detailed on Drawing E-3. •Conduit and wire shall be
compatible with existing circuit.
2.
Operators Room C20
Provide 3 additional receptacles in this room to the
following epecificationa:
A. 3 Duplex receptacles, I each located on North,
South, and East walls. Surface mount 120 off the
floor.
B. Use spare circuit 127 in LP -A.
C. Conduit shall be 1/21 diameter EMT.
D. wiring shall be 2 112, no ground necessary.
2021 Ess► Hennrnin Avenue • Suito 238'# ,polis, Minnesota 55413
_ 6121331.8660 TELEX: P9-0948
Page Two
Paul A. Laurence Co.
January 12, 1982
3. Existinq Lavatory Room C13
Rewire the existing water heater to the following
specifications:
A. Use spare circuit 126 in LP -A.
B. Conduit shall be -1/2' diameter EMT.
C. Wiring shall be 2-i12, 1-112G.
4. Existing Lavatory Room C13
Remove, replace, and rewire the wall mounted lighting fixture
over the existing lavatory sink per the following
specifications:
A. Connect to existing conduit feeding the overhead
lighting fixture. Conduit and wire shall be
compatible with the exisiting circuit.
B. New lighting fixture and existing overhead fixture
shall be operated from same wall mounted switch.
C. New fixture shall be as follows:
1. Approximate size 5• x 5• x 51°.
2. 120 volt operation
3. Plourescent - Single unit, one 40
watt/T12 lamp. Prismatic refractor shall
be completely weathersealed and gasketed
In cast aluminum end plates. Shall be
suitable for use in damp locations. Back
plate shall be extruded aluminum. Rapid
start H.P.P., class P ballast rated at 50
degrees. Rey slots to be provided in
back plate for additional support screws.
Provide 1/2• conduit entry in one end
plate.
4. Provide low gloss black paint finish.
Page Three
Paul A. Laurence Co.
January 12, 1982
Please submit a change order request for this additional work et
your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCBELEN-MAYERON
6 J`AASSSOC�IATE-S,, INC. -
Gerald S. Corrick, P:E.
Project Manager
cc: John P. Badalich, OSM
Dick Reeling, OSM Field Office, Monticello
John Simola, City of Monticello
Paul Blomberg, OSM
1r`3 71
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
Ilse tssmuf .
s aantw ORR.SC'NELlN-NAYERON i ASSOCIATES. INC.
0
1
1
l6
w7r101 aiODl COwlYtlAwla. wc.
�1 6"1 Ia Mwlwwl AM Will ID YIMwILAral3. MM ea.lipla 3314= Tom lease
infractor-- Paul A. Laurence Co. Pogo Order lb. 38
P.O. Box 1267. 10000 Hwy. 55 West field Nedlt. lb. 85
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55440 project Ifo. 068-2748.01
b Local log ' Monticello, MN ESA Want No. C270855-03
. accordence-.Ifh the teres of your contract dated November 20 19 80 with
City of. Monticello owner for WWTP Upgrading 6 -Appurtenant Work
w are horedy requested to co.ply with the following Clangs fron the Coil set plans and specifications:
lscrlpilon and Justlflcstlon: - Refer to Field,lsodlf it 85- IAMadled)
Provision of exterior lighting at doore'of th.. i'nnrrnl nyftAJppw..a ti.w•+.:.fnt
Room Building. Also revisiona to control wiringrnnd 11rnvfa+--n" rn bring suffielent Rower
to the standby emergency generator auxilary equipmept.
reoildo.n of .sig ihl: L16:yo r da.
y 6 material EquIps nt Ffoflf • Owerhaa0 Total Add Total Deduct
(Subcontractor) I 1
$786.00 I $40.00 'I $826.00
an1.In of Origlnsl Contrectl 54,704.000.00
antraef Tlvw C.O. / 37. Total .AddltICA I Tatel Doduat
$4,807.,417.07 I .$826.00
rIgInal ContlftfirC as 13f) s 141.200.00
:ont. Thru C.O. 137 Add ihle C.O. _ I Deduct TAIs C.O.
$35,155.9: $626.00
.
Total c,
'.
I Thro TIAs C.O. /38
$4.808.243.07
set RONIw Ino
Cwlt I f eponcles
$34.329.93
*.re alII be an ewteglaw of 0 days for camplefIon.• .
.T. date of fM caplet lm of Contract was October 28 , Il e2 and wa will be October 28 IOJZ
• Date Shoed
V:capted by
1/
Contractor II
IecoswrMed by
( Pee slowed
loglosser
spprowed bw oaf6 sinned
owsor
Paul A. Laurence Company
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
P.O. So. 1267
10.000 Highway 55 Welt
Minneapolis. MN 55440
Telephone 612/546.6911
TLx 290730
May 10. 1982
Orr-Schelen-Mayeron 8 Assoc.. Inc.
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota. 55413
Attn: Gerald Corrick
Re: Wastewater Treatment Upgrading L Appurtenant Work
.Monticello, Minnesota
EPA Project No. 0270855-03
Field Modification No. 85
Change Order Request No. 41
RECEIVED
ORRiCNWR-MAYERON 8 ASSOC.
Comm L� •U/
MAY 1 2 1982 J
I
GenI,.amen:
After reviewing Field Modification No. 85, dated March 29. 1982, for minor )
revisions to the exterior lighting and control wiring; we submit the following
price:
Subcontractor Material 8 Labor.................$786.00
General Contractor O.H. 8 P. - 5% .............. 40.00
Total .......................................... kgLm
If the above figure meets with your favorable approval, please issue a change
order•at yodr earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
UL A. LAUR N COMP Y
rrGrundtner .
roject Estimator
JG:jc
cc: Falco, Monticello, Minnesota
Job File
General File
subsidiary of a. J. Waves • aon......�,r•ny
Paul !.leuffIRM �^ ..., 1.... .......,. ..
,l.
ORR SCHEIEN • IYIAYERON R ASSOCIATES. INC
-
uulfing Engineers Division of Kidde Consultants, Inc.
_
and Surveyors
March 29, 1982
Paul A. Laurence Co.
P. O. Box 1267
10000 Highway 55 West
Minneapolis, MN 55440
Attn: Mr. Jerry Grundtner
Re: Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant
Upgrading And Appurtenant Work
EPA Project No. C270855-03
Field Modification {85
Exterior Lighting 6 Control Wiring Revisions
Gentlemen:
Review of shop drawings for the Controi building and Aeration
Pump and Blower Room lighting layouts has revealed that exterior
lights have not been provided for entrances to these buildings.
Also, field installation of electrical conduit and wiring in the
Control Building has revealed some minor deficiencies in power
and control wiring provisions for various equipment. The
following additions and revisions to wiring shall be made:
1. Sheet E-3
Furnish and install exterior lighting fixture, type 'E' as
listed in Specification Section 1640, Item .04, Fixture
Schedule, above entrance from walkway on west side of Control
Building. Provide light switch for fixture inside building
ajacent to intermediate landing interior light switch. Route
conduit to LP -9 in Operator's Room an second floor. wire
fixtures to sparo circuit 17 in LP -E.
2. Sheet E -B
Furnish and install exterior lighting fixture, type •E' as
listed in Specification Section 1640, Item .04, Fixture
Schedule, above entrance an west side of Blower Room.
Provide light switch for fixture inside building next to
light switch for interior lights. Connect to conduit for the
receptacle in entryway and wire to same circuit feeding
receptacle (Circuit B, LP -B).
2021 East Hennepin Avenue • Suite 238 a Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413
6121331-8660 TELEX: 29-0948
Page Two
Paul A. Laurence Co.
March 29, 1982
3. Sheet E-4
Control wiring coded 'CD', for motors Ml, M2 6 M3 shall be
changed from 6 i14 to 9 #14 from push button control to
MCC -A. Control Wiring, coded 'CA', for motor MSI, shall be
changed from 2 t14 to 5 t14 from push button control to
MCC -A. Control wiring for motors M3 and M61 shall be similar
to motor control diagram type 15 as shown on Drawing E-21.
Sheet E-17
4. Circuits for standby generator engine heaters and battery
charger from LP -A are not scheduled. -Use remaining spare 20A
circuits available in LP -A for engine heaters and battery
charger. Install a new 20A circuit breaker for each -new
spare circuit required.
Please submit a change order request for this additional work at
your earliest convenience.
Sincerely.
OAR-SCBELEN-MAYERON
iAPSOCIATES, I�NC�.
Gerald S. Carrick, P.E.
Project Manager
GSC:nlb
cc: John P. Badalich, OSM
Dick keeling, OSM Monticello Office'.
John Simola, City of Monticello.
Paul Blomberg, OSM
Dean Sharpe, OSM
J
1
7
C
T — '1
JUM CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
asci -me 1411.e1110
We swetlta4 ppp $CMr11h MAVEp ON a ASSOCIATES, I111C.IA
p• w• +ahl�+ •.1 w^IIs/ . s•wo.s .. ts.•t em tt•ase rw. Isoe.l
r�ntractor Paul A. Laurence Co. Cho -go Order fig. 39
Address P.O. Box 1267, 10000 Hcy. 55 West Field eocif, ft. 81
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Project flo. 068-2748.01
Job Location Monticello, Minnesota CPA Orent fm. 0270855-03
in accordance with the terms of Four contract dated November 20 1980 with
City of Monticello Ownar for WWTP Upgrading 6 Appurtenant Work
tow are here!/ recces -ed to car;tf with the 60110w'r.g changes Iran the contract Otani and spectticati0ns:
Description and Jtls•Iftcatton: - Rater to field aodif d 9I (attached)
The existine hv4rwnt 1 r tine use Jimplzort4coll and Wa■ therw[nre relerwted eeneei t.
the Sludee Vehicle Carate In addition a mora cost offeeeive vav to provide Vatwr
service to the Sludge Vehicle Garage has been Included by using a 1" Conner service
tapped into the existing water main.
breakdown of Coats this Change Order:
Kor 14ulpsent(material) Profit L O+arteed Total addI Tota' Oed..ct
$224.00 I $634.00 I 5128.00 I $986.00
also.,nt of Originot Contract: 1 4004,000.00
i
lContract Thrw c.0. / 38 Total addttlon
$4,810.870.07 9986.00
Ortginel Coe.rt.tgemelo (Nf ! 141.200.00
C_nt, Thrw C.O. 138 Nd This C.O.
$34.329.93 9986.00
Tote' Contract
Total Deduct Thr w This C.O. I39
94.811,856.07
y 1ems•w11q
I Dsdwet This C.O. conft„ganc'es
933.343.93
't•ra .111 be on er enllen of 0 days for comal•tlen.
*,P.O date of fes caw;l•f lam of Conroe, was October 28 , 11 82 •md new will be October 28 , 1982 .
acca;'ad by
Ca t t �Kt •r
. ,,, �I J. C.& Ak
1 ms' nit..►
apw•rw 6
Oe'•r
0410 1•a -ed
Date itsmee 51r7414
D4t0 91ep"
Paul A. Laurence Company
GENERAL CONtRACIORS
R,0 So. 1767
10.000 H"; h.v7 55 weal
Minneapohs, MN 55440
7eiephone 6121546.6911
7LK 790730
May 25, 1982
Orr-Schelen-Mayeron s Assoc., Inc.
2021 East Hennepin Ave., Suite 0238
Minneapolis, MN 55413
Attn: Mr. Gerald S. Corrick
Re: wastewater Treatment Upgrading and
Appurtenant work, Monticello,MN
EPA Project No. C270855-03
Change Order Request No. 43
Gentlemen:
RECEIVE(
W SCHELEN•MAYERDN 8 ASSk
MAY 2 02
,
I
I
Per Field Modification No. 81 dated March 3, 1982, in which we
relocate the existing hydrant, adding a new valve, and reroute
the water service to the sludge vehicle garage, we submit the
following price:
Material.............$634.00
Labor........ .$224.00
Overhead b Profit 1585128.00
Total $986.00
Please issue a Change Order for this work at your earliest convenience.
Yours truly,
PAUL A. LAURENCE COMPANY
�.� ";Oc
Pete Backlin
PB:lf
cc: Palco-Monticello,MN
Job File
General File
I
SoOeOnry a1 S J Grp.•1 '• •�. Cnm;.e ny /
peat a Leolenee r0"P"' n e, • ..� wnn.w„+nv onlnv
i. ORR SCHEIEN MAYERON B ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consu.'tiho Engineers
1o•u/Su- "e�•ors
March 3, 1982
PaulA. Laurence Co.
Box 1
10000 Highway 55 West
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55443
Attn: Mr. Pete Backlin
Re: Monticello waste water Treatment Plant
Upgrading a Appurteant work
EPA Project No. C270855-03
Field Modification #81
Gentlemen:
This field modification includes relocation of a hydrant and
changing the water service to the sludge vehicle garage.
(• During construction of the interceptor sewer near the location of
the equalization tank, a hydrant was removed by your
subcontractor, Hayes Contractors to facilitate construction of
that sever. Placement of the hydrant was to have been near its
original loation but it was later decided to move it north and
east to thelocation shown on attached revision drawing, Ml -r
(2). The gate valve on the hydrant lead must be moved from its
original location and the tee on the water main is to be plugged.
Additionally, the 1-1/4 inch cold water service to the sludge
vehicle garage was to have been extended approximately 180 feet
from the control building. For simpler installation, this rater
service has been changed to approximately 60 feet of 1 inch cop-
per with a tap to the existing 8 inch watermain. The service
shall be brought into the garage in such manner to accomodate
installation of a water meter by City personnel.
water service materials to be as follows:
a. Corporation stop shall be Ford F600, Mueller H-15000, A.Y.
McDonald 4701 or equal with threaded inlet and copper serv-
ice outlet.
b. Curb stop to be Ford B22 -444M, Mueller H15154,A.Y. McDonald
C6104 or equal with copper inlet and outlet.
C. Curb box to be Mueller 10300, Ford EM2-75-56 or equal,
complete with lid.
021 fast Hent. wt• • Suite ?SE ISi.;n,cfpo li�y -}•;iiincs[fs 5541 C 121331. E55J
Page Two
Paul A. Laurence Co.
March 2, 1982
We anticipate the work specified in this field modification will
/not require an adjustment in contract price.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCHELEN-Y.AYERON
6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Charles A. Lepa v
P.E.
CAL:min
cc: Mr. Gerald S. Corrick, OSM
Mr. John Badalich, OSM
Mr. John Simola, City of Monticello
Mr. Dick Reeling, OSM Field Office Monticello
WWI
I
NCJTE: ra0v0ScD %1,4 cc t, N„Eiti Fa.”
{ -ra 3G ,M, ...&*ED evD 4B97tac CL
L i �Ofa �. yoG ANS Vq� 1i X
dF { �`,� +4vD STcv -� MrTC w G ITy
a� � I t I �+WDPPfl
S i x I
� I
V
O '
I V I M4•.:�r!�eKE
AC.I-
I
»oa
X I
c 3:uDaE
I f
/ TTI
1
Is L� M1 I �w dLR,aa6
Q\44� +?
V' D10 �ysa,►w� �C�p, CnNulc�arl �
TD l���nlwf� w�`OILM�N TD SL WET Q
,AP.aD OIL cur,la wT COPJI'LACTO" Opl, w. �9
SIAL L: I'� bo' MID U."6A%ncs eLacL,W+q J, I w IA. 4-4awev- /
off" Illy, Drswip ETitle%-I Comm No.
ORA •CMBIBN MAYBRONIELD MOClGF1�T11Y�1 y
81
��• •Ae80CIA711AINC. ML XAM +1ptANT4 WATLQ%;NKe 27dg,o1
Not M, awm wo . qlu on CAVI No.
Dal. �m �-.�
wwnr CsrNu SMII. ,g1j, got rr AWLft., VMR[OA'fl M1 TyalrlLyt R��
COa pamCcT N0. C7.1O604 " 0%
® ABBOTTI A N
NORTHWE—Bary
STERN PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
HOSPITAL EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
1800 let Avenue South. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55407 • Telephone (612) 674.5025
PROPOSED EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
For the City of Monticello
Program Components
1. Development of formal policy and procedure
2. Supervisory training (2 hour session)
A. What is the Employee Assistance Program
B. Work related symptoms of a troubled employee
C. flow the supervisor can use the E. A. P.
J. Employee and family education (1 hour session)
A. What is the Employee Assistance Program
B. flow to use the E. A. P.
4. Assessment, counseling and referral
A. No charge for interview with E. A. P. Counselor
B. No charge for initial sossion with the referral agency
5. On-going consultation available to supervisors
6. Quarterly utilization reports (written or verbal)
Program Costs --$1,000 for twelve month period beginning on date to
be determined.
J