City Council Agenda Packet 09-27-19821 AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
September 27, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve Grimsmo.
Council Members: Phil White, Fran Fair, Dan Blonigen, Ken Maus.
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of the Minutes of September 13, 1982.
3. Citizens Comments/Petitions/Requests, Complaints.
4. Public Hearing - A Hearing on the Proposed Use of Revenue Sharing
Funds and the 1983 Municipal Budget.
Old Business
5. Resolution Adopting the 1983 Municipal Budget and Setting the
Tax Levy.
6. Resolution Callinq for a Public Hearinq on Proposed Public
r Improvements to Meadow Oak Subdivision and Setting Time, Date
l and Place thereof.
7. Consideration of a Proposal to Make Structural Alterations to
the Skating Building at 4th Street Park.
8. Conaidoration of Change Order 054 for the wastowater Treatment
Plant Construction Contract.
Now Bueineas.
9. Consideration of an Offer to Purchase a Part of the Oakwood Block.
10. Consideration of a Request to Renew a Conditional Uso Permit for
Construction 5.
11. Conaideration of a Request to Rezone from B-3 to R-3 the Marvin
Kramor and other Adjacent Property.
12. Conaidoration of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Es-
tabliah a Day Care Group Nursery in an R-3 Zona.
13. Consideration of an Exchange of Property to Facilitate the Dundas
Road FSctonsion.
I 14. Dr. Phil White - Comments Rolating to Property Owned by the Monti-
cello Development Corporation.
15. Approval of Bills for month of September, 1982.
16. Adjournment.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
September 13, 1982 -7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Dan Blonigen, Phil White,
Ken Maus.
Members Absent: None.
2. Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting Held on Auqust 23. 1982.
A motion was made by Fair, seconded by white to approve the
minutes of the regular meeting held on August 23, 1982, as
presented. voting in favor was white, Grimsmo, Fair and Bloni-
gen. Abstaining was Ken Maus due to his absence at the last
meeting.
4. Discussion by Residents Affected by the West Bridqe Lift Station
Failure of May 27th, 1982.
Mr. Ron Thismnesh, representing the property owners along Front
Street, discussed with the Council the current statue regarding
their claims for damaqe as a result of the newer beck up that
occurred May 27th, 1982. Mr. Thimmesh noted that the city's
insurance company, Hone Insurance Company, has basically in-
dicated that it is their opinion that the City of Monticello
was not liable in any way for the lift station failure as a
result of their investigation, and thus, would not be liable
for reimbursing the residents for any damage that occurred.
Although an official otatement from the insurance company deny-
ing the claims hoe not yet been received, from conversations
the City Administrator has tied with the insurance company and
indications to the hone owners have boon that the company will
not be paying the claims. Mr. Thimmosh inquired so to whether
the City would consider pooeibly reimbursing the property
owners half of their damage coot directly as a result of the
insurance company's failure to pay the claims. It was noted
by the property owners that approximately $13,000 in damage
wan done by the sower back up and they requested that the City
consider paying $6500.00 to the property owners as eonponsa-
tion.
Although the Council understood the problems incurred by the
property owners, it was the concensus at the present time that
the City could not or should not be responsible for reimbursing
for the damagoo if the insurance company fools the City is not
liable in this incident.
Council Minutes - 9/13/B2
As a result, a motion was made by Fair, seconded by Maus and
unanimously carried to table any action regarding the request
for reimbursement for one month to enable the City to get a
final report from the insurance company on the status of the
claims and the City's liability and to also obtain a complete
itemized listing of the damages incurred by the property
owners along Front Street.
5. Consideration of a Recommendation from the Monticello Plan-
ninq Commission Relatinq to a Proposal for a Manufactured
Housinq Planned Unit Development. (Meadow Oak, Mr. Jim Boyle).
Mr. Jim Boyle and his associate, Mr. Dick Knutson, as well as
other representatives of Mr. Boyle and Mr. Knutson were present
at the Council Meeting to present a concept plan of their pro-
posed development of approximately 177 acres of land located
in the southeast portion of the City. The proposal contained
approximately 95 executive home Bites, 186 single family
attached home sites and 255 single family detached home sites
for a total of approximately 536 hone sites.
Mr. Knutson and Associates presented their proposal and ad-
dresses the fnllowinn items3
1. it is their intent to retain as many trees as possible
and only remove those which would be necessary for the
placement of a home or to place atrecta, etc.
2. It in the developer's intent to incorporate a aeries
of trails throughout the development to give the real -
dents of the subdivision an opportunity to have access
to the park's system without having to cross other
people's lands.
7. It is the developer 'a. intent to use a variety of home
manufacturer's homco rather than stick with one home
or only one or two plana for the exteriors of the homes.
4. The dovoloper would most likely act the homes on perm-
anent wood foundationn or basements.
5. It is the developer's intent that approximately 90• of
the homes would have basements.
6. The dovolopor would like the City to consider a 5 foot
aide yard setback for acccosory buildings and would be
willing to stay with the 10 foot aide yard setback when
it was living quarters that would he abutting a aide
yard setback lino so that if a neighbor had a garage on
his property which wan adjacent to the property line
and the other neighbor had a living room which was ad-
jacent to the property line, the nearest the two could
W would be 15 feet.
Council Minutes - 9/13/82
7. The exteriors of the home would have to be finished
before people could move into their homes which would
include the painting, landscaping, paving, etc.
S. It would be the developer's intent that prof.ably 509
of the homes would have garages at the time they were
constructed and it would be their intent that all of
them would have a garage within 5 years.
9. The developer would be willing to plat out 30 lots at
a time for approval rather than expect an overall
final approval on the entire project, thereby giving
the City much tighter control on the development as
it progresses.
Mr. Knutson explained to the Council that the primary reason
for pursuing this development under the Planned Unit Develop-
ment ordinance was to enable the plat to retain as many trees
as possible and to use existing ponding and wetland areas
along with park land to be incorporated into the development
in an aesthetically pleasing manner. The basic reason for
requesting that some of the lots be smaller than the current
minimum 80 foot width requirements and 10,000 square foot
reouirements is that it would allow in certain areas lots to
be smaller to compensate for some of the larger lots that
would be platted to save the trees and ponding areas. Overall,
Mr. Knutson indicated that the plat would overall average
10,000 square feat per lot excluding.park land, streets and
roads, etc. It was also noted that the developers feel com-
fortablo Chat no more than 20% of the total lots in the manu-
factured housing section would be at the minimum GO foot
width and 7,000 square foot total area.
Comments from citizens regarding the plat wore heard by the
Council as follows: Mr. lb Doran and Mr. Greg Roden inquired
as to whether the proposed lot sizes included any low lands,
ponds, or other unbuildablo land in using the 10,000 square
foot average. It was noted by Mr. Knutson that, overall, some
of the lot sires would include ponding areas that would be
unbuildable but the developers still felt that thoy could
moot the 10,000 square foot average par lot oven excluding
ponding areas, wetlands, park lands and road dedications.
Local contractor, J.W. Miller, felt that this project, in
general, would be good for the community and Cho resulting
growth that would tomo with this dovolopment would also be
good for othor builders and contractors as additional work
would bo availablo.
6Z)
Council Minutes - 9/13/82
Also, Mr. Mel Wolters did not object to the proposed average
lot sizes and noted that currently the City does allow 0 line
duplexes to be Wilt on lots that could be as small as 45 to
50 feet. In addition, it was noted by Mr. Knutson that the
proposed development of the manufactured hang. sites would be
done in stages of approximately 30 lots at a time with 15
executive Wilding sites also being developed simultaneously.
In regard to the square foot minimum of 10,000 square feet,
Mr. Knutson noted that the development could be platted to
meet City ordinances using the grid system to obtain the 80
foot minimum width and 10,000 square foot minimum but he
felt the development would not be as aesthetically pleasing
under the normal subdivision ordinances as many of the trees
and wetlands, ponding areas, etc. and park land would be
eliminated if the developer was forced to use this system
of platting.
The Planning Commission unanimously recommended that this
concept for a Planned Unit Development be approved so that
the developer could prepare hie preliminary plat or. the
same.
.,_.. maLion .:as made ,, Fair, ccccnded by and uran!-
moualy carried to approve the proposed concept of the Planned
Unit Development as presented with the understanding that the
developer will plat the property and average at least 10,000
square feet per lot with 7,000 square feet being the minimum
lot and the averages to exclude any ponding area, park land
area, watland area and platted streets.
G. Consideration of a Recommendation from the Monticello Planning
Commission for a Proposal for a Planned Unit Development Known
as Victoria Square by Mr. Mike Rohrer.
Mr. Mike Rohrer, who owns a parcel of land in the vicinity of
the intersection of Cedar Street and Dundas Road south of I-94,
presented his proposal for a Planned Unit Development on the
property for the development of office condos and townhousco.
The project, to be known as Victoria Square, would include three
parcels, Parcel A, Parcel B and Parcel C. Parcel A would include
29 townhouses on 2.24 acros, Parcel B would contain office con-
dos of 52 unite on 4.46 acres and Parcel C would contain a re-
tail apace of approximately 11,000 square foot on the 1.7 acres
of land. An part of the development plan, Mr. Rohrer has In-
dicated a willingness to give to the City a strip of land run-
ning north and south through his parcel in order that a now
Cedar Street frontage road could be developed through the plat.
-4-
Council Minutes - 9/13/82
It was also noted that the proposal would be to develop this
project in a Victorian style of buildings.
The Planning Commission unanimously approved the concept
stage of the development for the Planned Unit Development
and as a result, a motion was made by Blonigen, seconded
by Maus and unanimously carried to approve the concept
stage as presented for Victoria square as part of the
Planned Unit Development.
7. Consideration of Ordinance Amendment Establishing Archi-
tectural Controls in R-1, R-2 and A-3 zones, and Adding
Certain Definitions.
Because of a recent State law which required that all com-
munities allow manufactured homes within residential zoning
districts in which they can meet the architectural control
requirements, it has become necessary for the City of Monti-
cello to develop an ordinance of architectural controls
within residential zoning districts. The consulting City
Planner, John Uban of Howard Dahlgren 6 Associates, has
been working with the Planning Commission to develop a
definition of a mobile home and also a definition of a
manufactured house. The recommended dafinitions, as
approved by the Planning Commission, are as followo+
MANUFACTURED HOUSING: "Manufactured Home" means a
structure, transportable in one or more sections, which
in the traveling mode, is eight body foot or more in
width or 40 body feet or more in length, or, when erect-
ed on side, is 760 or more square fact, and which is
built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as
a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation when
connected to the required utilitieo, and includes the
plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical
systems contained therein] except that the term in-
cludes any structure which meets all the requirements
and with respect to which the manufacturer voluntarily
filoe a certification required by the City and complies
with the atandarde oetabliohed under thin chapter and
which meets the Manufactured Home Building Code.
MOBILE. HOME.: A mobile home in a manufactured home that
is loss than 16 foot wide,over at least 30 foot of its
length in the erected mode, suitable for year around
occupancy and containing tb samo water supply, waste
disposal, and electrical conveniences as immobile
housing and subject to tax or registration under State
law, and having no foundation other than wheals, jacks,
or skirtings. Width moacuramont shall not take account
of overhangs and other projections beyond the principal
exterior walls.
Council Minutes - 9/13/62
The Planning Commission also recommended that the zoning or-
dinances for all residential districts include the following
architectural controls:
1. Minimum building width of 24 feet.
2. Minimum 3:12 roof pitch with minimum six (6) inch
soffit.
3. Building anchored to a permanent concrete or treated
wood foundation.
4. No metal siding permitted wider than 12 inches or
without a one-half 00 inch or more overlap and
relief.
5. Minimum floor area of 1,000 square fact.
6. Moet all regulations of the Minnesota Uniform Build-
ing Code.
After reviewing the above, a motion was made by White, second -
ad by Pair and unanimously carrried to amend the ordinances
by adding the definitions as presented for a mobile home and
a manufactured Tome and also to amend the R-1, R-2 and R-3
gone by adding the six (6) architectural controls as listed.
(Sae ordinance Amendment 9/13/82 0122). T
B. Consideration of AQpointment to and P.stablishinq a Salary
For the Position of Wastewater Plant Lab Analyst.
Previously, the City Council approved and adopted a job
description for the now Wastewater Plant Lab Analyst
position. Aa part of the job description approval, the
Council advertised within the City departments that this
position was available as a promotional position from
within.
Mr. Scan }iancock, current Wastewater Treatment Plant employee,
has applied for the position of Lab Analyst.
A motion was made by White, ascended by Blonigen and unani-
mously carried to appoint Mr. Scan ttancock to the position
Of Wastewater Plant Laboratory Analyat as of October 1,
1982 at an annual $19,800.00 salary.
Council Minutes - 9/13/82
9. Consideration of Appointment to Planning Commission for
Vacancy Created by Resignation of Bill Burke.
Based on a recoamendation by the Planning Commission, a
motion was made by White, seconded by Blonigen and unani-
mously carried to appoint Mr. Richard Carlson to fill a
vacancy on the Planning Commission created by the resigna-
tion of Mr. Bill Burke. The appointment would be immedi-
ately and would be until the end of the year.
10. Presentation of 1983 Preliminary Budqet.
City Administrator, Tan Eidem, presented the proposed Pre-
liminary 1983 Budget to the Council for their reviewal.
A public hearing on the proposed Preliminary 1983 Budget
will be held at the next Council Meeting, September 27,
1982. A special meeting for the purpose of reviewing,:
specifically the budget, was scheduled for 7:00 A.M.,
Friday, September 17, 1982.
Meeting Adjourned.
Rick wolfst4sr
Assistant Administrator
Council Agenda - 9/27/92
AGENDA SUPPLEMENT
Public Hearinq - A Hearinq on the Proposed Use of Revenue Sharino
Funds and the 1983 Municipal Budget. (TAE)
Federal regulations require that we hold two hearings concerning
the use of revenue sharing funds. The first hearing is the pro-
posed use hearing and is done before the preliminary budget is
established. It gives the general public a right to suggest uses
of revenue sharing funds. That hearing was held on August 12,
1982 at 4:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers. There was no one in
attendance at that meeting. The second hearing that is required
is the revenue sharing budget hearing. This is the revenue
sharing budget hearing. This is the one that is held in con-
junction with the public hearing on the overall municipal budget.
This is Monday's hearing. This hearing is when the amount of
revenue sharing funds as proposed to be used is explained and is
addressed in relation to the overall budget. The use of revenue
sharing funds as proposed is stated on the facing page of your
preliminary budget for the revenue sharing funds. As you recall,
past use of revenue sharing funds has been dedicated to the local
share of the Wastewater Treatment PlAnt arrant. Anticipating
completion of that project, this year's entitlement of revenue
sharing funds has been dedicated to Capital outlay Expenditures
primarily in water and in fire, thereby reducing the tax levy
that would be necessary to make those expenditures were they to
stay in their own funds. Also included in revenue sharing as
proposed is the contribution to the Joint Recreation Committee.
Anyone attending this hearing has the right to suggest alternate
uses of revenue sharing, but having missed the proposed use
hearing, these comments need not create a change in the proposed
budget. Any other commonts on the Muneipal Budget can also be
raised at this hearing and I or the staff should be prepared to
handle any questions of that nature.
- 1 -
Council Agenda - 9/27/82
5. Resolution Adoptinq the 1983 Municipal Budqet and Setting the
Tax Levy. (TAE)
After all comments have been made concerning both the revenue
sharing budget and the overall municipal budget, a resolution
adopting the budget and setting the levy is required. If there
are to be more changes made beyond those suggested at the special
meeting of last Friday, but the changes are not substantial, you
should still be able to go ahead with the resolution. If the
changes are not major, we should be able to incorporate those
changes into the budget right during the meeting and thus the
adjusted figures would be before you and the resolution could
be done. If, however, the changes are major, I suggest that
you postpone adopting the resolution so that the final document
can be prepared and all of the final calculations can be double
checked and put into place before final adoption. The changes
that have been made to date as a result of the special meeting
are the transfer of $1,200.00 from the Administration Depart-
ment to the Civil Defense Department for the Oakridge Tennessee
School. There has been a rework of the sewer user fees and
finally adjustments to the summary pages and a double checking
of all of our addition and correction of typographical errors.
The reworking of the sewer user charges resulted in the following
changes.
Finally, if we aro forced to postpone the resolution, I will
request from the County Auditor an extension of the certifi-
cation date no that we may certify our levy on October 13th,
rather than October 8th, thus eliminating the necessity of
one more spacial meeting to adopt the budget. Upon adoption
of the budget and netting the tax levy, we will then prepare the
final budget document which will include copies of the resolution,
all of the corrections no well as all aorto of informational ma-
toriala that will give cone meaning to all the pages of numbers
that you have. The final budget document should be ready to be
passed out by November. That will be the final working document.
pOSSIBLF. ACTIONS 1. If the suggested changes have boon made
satisfactorily, and any changes suggostod
at the hearing aro to be incorporated and
aro minor, the changes will be made at the
time and the resolution can be adopted.
2. If potential changoo aro significant, the
adopting of the resolution should be post-
poned and than adopted on October 12th, 1982.
RFFFRrNcnsi A copy of the revolution adopting the budget and net-
ting the tax levy, a copy of the preliminary budget distributed to
you on 9/13/82. - 2 -
Council Agenda - 9/27/82
Resolution Callino for a Public Hearinq on Proposed Public improve-
ments to Meadow Oak Subdivision and Settinq Time. Date and Place
Thereof. (TAE).
Critical to the timely development of Meadow Oak is the process
of initiating the public improvements. The resolution before you
for this Monday does nothing more than acknowledge receipt of the
feasibility report prepared by OSM and calls a public hearing for
that report. This hearing is the one where all affected property
owners will be notified to attend to receive information on possible
costs, possible assessments, and possible time frame. The calling
of this hearing and the holding of this hearing in no way commits
the City to proceeding with the project. At the time of the hearing,
the developers from Meadow Oak would have an opportunity to address
the full scope of their needs as well as the engineer addressing
the full scope of the project. The dollar figure included in the
resolution and the public notice is taken from OSM's feasibility
report and at this time is considered to be higher than actual
costs. Through discussions between the developers and OSM,some
design changes have come about that would likely reduce the actual
cost of the project. We are,however, using the original figure
because of the fact that once the hearing is held, a project can-
not be increased in scope without additional hearings, but it can
be reAuced without farther hearings or notices. Further. hetween
the time of calling for the hearing and the actual time of the
hearing, the developers, the engineers and the City will have to
get together to discuss at least tentative financing proposals
so that we have some significant information to present at the
public hearing with regard to the financing of ouch a major
project.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing.
2. Postpone the resolution in favor of assembling more infor-
mation on the project prior to the actual rotting of the
public hearing.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution setting the public hearing for
October 12th. If, because of the nature of this project, you wish
to have a special night set aside for this hearing, we can simply
make a data change in the resolution.
W7ERENCF.Si A copy of a resolution calling for a public hearing,
copies of maps showing the extant of the first phase of improvements,
copy of OSM'a feasibility report submitted to you on August 9th, 1982.
- 3 -
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Monticello will
meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M.
on Tuesday, October 12th, 1982, to consider the making of im-
provements to and for Meadow Oaks Subdivision, a Planned Unit
Development, by installing sanitary sewer and water distribution lines,
storm sewer, and making street improva:ents, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 629.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be
assessed for such improvement is the property in Meadow Oak
Subdivision and the property abutting other parte of the im-
provement. The estimated cost of such improvement is $1,393,500.00
Such persons as desired to be heard with reference to the pro-
posed improvement will be heard at this meeting.
Thomas A. Eidem
City Administrator
Published in the Monticello Times on September 30th and October 7th,
1982.
RESOLUTION 1982 #55
RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING REARING
ON IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted
July 26, 1982, a report has been prepared by OSH, Inc. with
reference to the improvements for the Meadow Oat Planned Unit
Development, and this report was received by the Council on
August 9, 1982.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will consider the improvements for the
Meadow Oak Planned Unit Development in accordance
with the report and the assessment of affected
property for all or a portion of the coat of the
improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 429, at an estimated total coat of the
improvement of $1,393,500.00.
( 2. A public hearing shall be held on such a proposed
improvement on the 12th day of October, 1982 in the
Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. and
the City Administrator/Clark shall give mailed and
published notice of such hearing and improvement
as required by law.
Adopted by the Council this 27th day of September, 1982.
ATTEST:
Thomas A. Eidem
City Administrator
Arve A. Grim®o
Mayor of Monticello
C 2
iso •
. t
LEGEND
pitopo ---g"
Sr
,,o SWITAOSS"
155-0"-OQO-101
15s -011 -OW -111
155-011- 000-171
GI
LEGEND
•
l
e reurrwe
MAKWACTI
(SINGLE PJ
NATAIACTU
(SINGLE FAI
TOTAL
muuuun DRuvuseu S7umm SEYYEH
w:Eof'�IE M
l
Mtdljou► OQij STORM SEWER
JAMB T. SOME /
l�J EXHIBIT E /
wrEoli�'E M
EXECUTIVE HOMESITES
MANUFACTURED HOMESITES
(WHOLE FAMILY ATTACHED)
MANUFACTURED HOIESITES
(SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED)
TOTAL
LEGEND
HJe� STREET WIDTH 32 F -F
,Monacan STREET WIDTH 36)F -F
Afmdow Oai.,
JAMES T. BOYLE
c
STREET
CONSTRUCTION
c ��
EXHIBIT o /
Council Agenda - 9/27/82
7. Consideration of a Proposal to Make Structural Alterations to the
the Skatinq Buildinq at 4th Street Park. (LDK).
A couple of months back, Ken Maus and Loren Klein were appointed
by acting Mayor Grimsmo to work with representatives of the Youth
Hockey Association to try to work out details of how an addition
might be made at the 4th Street warming house which could include
restrooms and storage.
Ken and I have met with the romps from the Hockey Association and
a proposal was worked out which is herein presented.
The Hockey Association would give the City $500 up front toward
the cost of the building and then make annual payments of $300 to
$500 toward the cost of the project until a portion or all of
the costs were paid off. The Hockey Association would assume any
additional heat costs over what is now used.
The project was not part of the 1983 Budget proposal because Rick
felt there would be adequate funds in the present budget to include
this project.
This will M A A(Rr119Ginn ItPTI with repregentatives of the Mockey
Aosociation present.
The project cost (a bid has been received to substitute this coat)
is lose than $9,000.00.
8. Consideration of Change Order 054 for the Wastewater Treatment
Plant Construction Contract, WS).
This Change Order omits the 150 foot long wood screen wall that
would have protected the Lindberg house from noise or foaming
at the aeration tanks. Since the City now owns the Lindberg
house, it was felt the wall was not needed. Total savings
of $5,800 leaving a balance of $21,013.93 in the contingency
fund.
RCPERENCESI Sao copy of enclosed change order 054.
- 4 -
CONTRACT CHANCE ORDER
a,lse neeNs�
Ws {w/tlt�
ORR-SCKELLN NAVUON & AifOCIATU, INC.
A0V so, 9-140. a uooe co.au.-..?I me
e.r 4..eu..1e ew•s o we.s.wD.4, w Mara aes •w• asst
Cw+recter Paul A. LAurence Co. Charge Order f. 54
wddress P.O. Box 1267. 10000 Hiahwav 55 west Field Nodlf, no. 69
Minneanolis. MN 55440 FwoJect No.068-2748.01
Job Location Monticello. MN Ct Oren' tb4;270855-03
in accordance with the terms of your contract dated November 20 19�_ with
City of Monticello Owner for WWrP Upqradinq and Appurtenant work
tow are he•etr rosuested to carply with the tolloolnp &&Not frow the contract plans and speclticetlons:
Description and Justification: - Refer to Field tlodlf /69 (Attached)
Due to the Purchase of the orooerty adiacent to the waatewatPr Traa men
Plant, the 150' Screen wall on the east side of the aeration tanks was
deleted.
Breakdown of Cants "is O:nlgo Order:
4 Oro. [9w1pa"+(material profit a overhead Total Add Total Deduct
$1,300,0o I $4,500.00 1 I I $5,800.00
*mount of Orlgloal Cantron: 9
tract Thru C.O. #_U Total Addition
$4,829,986.07
Original Cat+ingewclse q/► 6141.200_00
Cont. Thry C.O. #_UI Add Thle C.O.
515,213.93
Total Contran I
Total Deduct Thr u Thls C.O. 154 l
$5,800.00 $4,824,186.07
tat *We In lro
Dedun This C.O. Cont I"gencles
$5,800.00 $21,013.93
there will be on ewlatylon of 0 days for completion.
the def* of the cdeptetlon of Contra* des October 28, 1982 and eft will be October 28,, iqZ.
s.cwpted by DNe honed ? ' %-8L
Dant.• or //'�,� � � � �/!n1" t�
�. coaim4naad 9y �4c.. l.rY1/'^•CX` We cloned el
/ �L
[p i net
4P,Q.w by
Owher
We [toned
Paul A. Laurence Company
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
P 0 80. 1?67
10,066 N,9hwey 5$ west
M,nneepol-c MN $5440
TeieOhone 61?/N6.691t
TLx 790736
September 8, 1982
Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Assoc., Inc.
2021 East Hennepin Avenue, Suite 238
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413
Attn: Mr. Gerald Corrick
Re: Wastmuter Treatrnient Upgrading & Appurtenant Work
Monticello, Minnesota
EPA Project No. C270855-03
Field Modification No. 69
Change Chafer Request No. 53
Gentlemen:
After reviewing Field Modification ho. 69, dated January 5, 1982, for elimina-
tion of the 150'-(Y" wood screen wall located on the east side of the aeration
tanks; we submit the following credit:
Material Credit ..................34506.00
Labor credit .................... 1300.00
Total Credit .................... "Sy�800_00
If the above figure meets with your favorable approval, please issue a change
order at your earliest uanvenience.
Sincerely,
,„PAUL A. LAURP4M COMPANY
Jerry Grundtner W r%-, E I♦ C D
Project Estimator a A=
cc: Cameral File
Job File
Palco, Monticello, MN
son.0.6" 01 S • GSD+es env
Peyl, A L.eu•ente CO -041) - • .. 40tw"'.0, eARP1e.0e
art S £ P 9 = 198?
ORR•SCHELEN-NIAYERON 6 ASSOCIATES, ING
:onsuldng fngineets
Lend Surve�,ors
December 30, 1981
Paul A. Laurence Co.
P 0. Box 1267
10000 Highway 55 West
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440
Attn: Jerry Grundtner
Re: Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant
Upgrading a Appurtenant work
EPA Project No. C270855-03
Field Modification 169
Gentlemen:
Due to the recent purchase of the property adjacent to the
Wastewater Treatment Plant, the 150' Wood Screen wall as detailed
i on Drawing No. 4 east of the Aeration tanks will no longer be
required.
Please submit a change order credit at your convenience.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Gerald S. Corrick, P.E.
Project Manager
cc: John Badalich, OSM
John Simola, City of Monticello
Dick Reeling, OSM Field Office, Monticello
2021 East Menu, - iue • Suhr 236 - Alinneapolis. Mlinnesota 55413 • 612(331• BG60
Council Agenda - 9/27/82
9. Consideration of an Offer to Purchase a Part of the Oakwood Block.
A short time ago the Mayor received a letter from a party interested
in purchasing a half (ai) acre of the Oakwood Block for a price of
$40,000.00. Because the prevailing attitude seems to be one that
would encourage development of the Oakwood Block as a single unit
rather than selling off small parcels for individual developers,
we began talking to other parties who might be interested. Security
Federal expressed an interest in the site and the possible purchase
of an acre and a half (15 acres). An acre and a half that Security
Federal would be interested in and the half acre that the other
party would be interested in would take up 80% of the block. As a
result, we have spoken with Security Federal about the possibility
of taking the entire block, developing the entire area and then
leasing or selling space that they found unnecessary for their own
use. I spoke Monday night at Industrial Day with Gail Johnson with
Security Federal and she said that there is serious interest in
such a development project. I asked her at that time to secure for
me a letter that if nothing more stated that a proposal was in the
process of being developed. She told me that she would talk to the
oxecutive officers at Security Federal and try to got such a letter
for Monday evening. I have not,as of yet,recoived that letter.
One aspect of the sale of Oakwood Block that we should at least keep
in the hack of our mind is the possible necessity of going to a
public offering of the land. Since it is publicly owned, it might
be a requirement that it would have to be publicly offered in order
to ausuro maximum dollars for the sale. I am hoping to meet with
the City Attorney on the public offering requirement as soon as
possible. I hope to have some information available for you on that
aspect by Monday.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1. Accept the offer and sell one half acre of the Oakwood Block.
2. Reject the offer and stipulate a reason for denying the offer.
3. Table the offer in lieu of additional research.
RECOMMENDATION, Table the offer until a ccmploto legal and financial
report can be prepared determining the boot use of the Oakwood Block.
- 5 -
Council Agenda - 9/27/82
10. Consideration of a Request to Renew a Conditional Use Permit
for Construction 5. (IDK).
Mr. Tom Brocker of Construction 5 has requested that the City
Council consider granting an extension of a conditional use
granted them approximately two years ago to develop an apart-
ment building on Blocks 42 and 43 of Lower Monticello. Be-
cause that conditional use had not been utilized within the
12 month period allowed for a conditional use, it was thereby
void and renewal is necessary before any further construction
could begin on any buildings of 13 or more units. The developer
is asking the Council to renew the conditional use so that they
can proceed with construction during the next year on short
notice if financing would become available to them at an
acceptable rate of interest, etc.
It is Construction 5's intent at this time to go ahead with the
construction of a 12 unit apartment Wilding as proposed at
this time and then as soon as construction financing is avail-
able, as previously stated, to continue with two more 24 unit
buildings.
At the Planning Commission meeting sume concern was given as to
approving the overall development all at one time and the Com-
mission felt maybe it would be best if the City of Monticello
were to approve only the first phase, that is; the 12 unit
apartment building at this time, and watch the progress of
that construction before recommending the consideration of any
further construction. (It should be noted that a conditional
use is not necessary for the first 12 units of this project
and that the approval would only be necessary for the next
two 24 unit buildings which would be built when financing wore
available).
The Planning Camniasion voted 4 to 1 to deny the request for
the extension for the second phase of thin project until after
the first phase or the first twelve unit apartment building
had been constructed to see what typo of a track record thin
developer would display.
- 6 -
Council Agenda - 9/27/82
11. Consideration of a Request to Rezone from B-3 to R-3 the Marvin
Kramer and other Adjacent Property. (LDK).
During the public hearing process for the proposed development
of Chateau Plaza, a housing project for the elderly, approxi-
mately two months ago, a determination was made as to the
approximate location of the Collector Road which would connect
Country Club Road and Country Club Manor with 7th Street at the
approximate intersections of Walnut Street and 7th Street.
At that time the property upon which the Chateau Plaza was to
be built was zoned B-3 and would be the only parcel of property
lying immediately north of the proposed Collector Road which
would be zoned B-3 with all the property surrounding it being
zoned R-3.
A consideration was given at that time tc, rezoning that parcel
of land where Chateau Plaza would be located to B-3. That con-
sideration was passed by the Council and thereby the property
was zoned R-3. At this time Jim and Pam Lindberg are proposing
to develop a day care center on the Marvin Kramer property.
That property is also lying immediately north of the proposed
Collector Road and is the only property mediately north and
adjacent to the Collector Road which would be zoned B-3. The
balance of the property on that side of the road is zoned R-3.
It is a Planning Commission recommendation that the Council
consider rezoning that portion of the property which is owned
by Marvin Kramer and zoned B-3 to the zoning R-3 to allow the
collector Road from the intersection of Elm and Country Club
Road to the intersection of 7th and Walnut Streets to be the
boarder lino which separates the R-3 zone on the north side of
that road from the B-3 zone on the south side of the same road.
This action for rezoning was prompted by a request for a
conditional use within an R-3 zone which was made by Jim and
Pam Lindberg regarding the Kramer property. The Planning
Commission voted unanimously to recommend the property im-
mediately north of the proposed Collector Road be rezoned
from B-3 to R-3 if that property was lying between the inter-
sections of Country Club Road and Elm Street and the inter-
sections of walnut Street and 7th Street and that the property
on the south aide of that same proposed road be zoned B-3.
- 7 -
Council Agenda - 9/27/82
12. Consideration of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Es-
tablish a Dav Care Group Nursery in an R-3 Zone - Jim and Pam
Lindberq• (LDK).
As was discussed in the previous item, Jim and Pam Lindberg have
proposed to develop a day care group nursery on the Marvin Kramer
property. The proposal would be for a permanent type day care
group nursery facility.
In an R-3 zone, such as was recommended for this property by the
Planning Commission in the previous item, a day care group
nursery requires a conditional use.
The Lindbergs have indicated that if the rezoning for this
property is approved for the day care group nursery facility
and that if the conditional use for the same is granted, that
they would be willing to deed to the City the southerly 80
foot portion of that Kramer property for the placement of the
Collector Road which would connect Country Club Manor to Hwy 25.
That dedication of property would be contingent upon the City
developing a street on that property.
Several letters have heen rereived regarding this subject in
support of the conditional use being approved for the day care
�- group nursery facility.
The members of the Planning Commission felt in their discussion
that a day caro group nursery center would be a valuable asset
to the community and thoreforo recommended the Council consider
granting this conditional use request.
-e-
Council Agenda - 9/27/82
13. Consideration of an Exchange of Property to Facilitate the
Dundas Road Extension. (LDK).
Several months ago at the direction of the City Council, the
Zoning Administrator undertook a project of determining the
owner of a small wedged shaped parcel of land south of Danner's
Trucking Garage between new Hwy 25 and old Hwy 25. Research of
the records in the courthouse has determined that Mel Wolters
is the property owner of that small wedged shaped plot of ground
in question. An agreement in principal has been arrived at
between the City of Monticello and Mr. Wolters whereby Mr. Wol-
ters would trade to the City the property which the City needs
to complete Dundas Road to Hwy 25 in exchange for the City
abandoning the abutting right-of-way of old Hwy 25 to him.
In effect, the old Cedar Street would be vacated from the point
at which Dundas Road would cross it south to where Cedar joins
with Hwy 25, then it would be the procedure for the City to
vacant tho westerly half of that street to Mr. Wolters, the
abutting property owner and the easterly half of that street
to Mr. Ken Krionke, the easterly property owner. At this
time, the easterly property is under an option to Mr. Mike
Rohrer who would join that Krienke property to his proposed
Victoria Square. Also, at this time Mr. Wolters and Mr. Rohrer
are discussing the possibility of joining both their properties
in that area and forming a joint venture on at least part of
Victoria Square.
At this time it is a staff request that the Council authorize
the execution of the documents to facilitate the trade of
property which would be necessary to accomplish the City
owning the property upon which Dundas Road would be extended
westerly to join with Elwy 25. A map is enclosed with the
supplement which shows the present property lines and also
which shows what the proposed now property lines would be in
order to accomplish the extension of Dundao Road.
- 9
n ?• ^ J
\ N 3
\ 4
A
w
N
v8e.92 a v�
e aN
TO ft AQV'lQto AV (IQ %Do%ljo" " ranNsicw1 IO. 549/14•".
(�1 D go. Woo s Popo.
r' K. . .ca owww44
LIQ= FM SEPTEMBER DISBURSEMENTS
AN= cinx
90.
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone Service
50.71
10374
St. Cloud Fire Equipment - Serviced fire extinguisher
7.00
10375
Gruys, Johnson 6 Associates - Computer processing
110.00
10376
Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax for July 6 part of June
5,785.36
10377
MN. State Treasurer - PEPA
109.26
10378
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
7,565.22
10379
Twin City Wine- Liquor
1,192.95
10380
Griggs, Cooper 5 Co. - Liquor
5,688.65
10381
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll Deduction for M. Irmiter
20.00
10382
State Treasurer - PERA withholding
194.18
10383
State Treasurer - Monthly FICA for August
428.00
10384,
Commissioner of Revenue - State Withholding for August
268.00
10185
Wright County State Bank - Federal Withholding For August
572.60
10386
Wright County State Bank - 6 month C.D.
35,000.00
10387
Wright County State Bank - Purchase of C.D. for 6 month
16,000.00
10388
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
22,260.98
10389
Wright County State Bank - 6 month C.D.
11,000.00
10390
Griggs, Cooper 5 Co. - Liquor
109.70
10391
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll deductions
20.00
10392
Granite City Register - Service Charge
113.50
10393
A.J. Ogle - Beer
1,303.50
10394
Dick Beverage Co. - Beer, etc.
5,360.80
10395
Grosslel n Beverage Co. - Beer
20,603.84
10396
Day Dist. Co. - Beer, etc.
254.55
10397
Dahlheim er Dist. - Beer, etc.
12,699.33
10398
Thorpe Dist. - Bear
7,351.55
10399
Old Dutch Foods, Inc. - Misc. mdeo.
215.55
10400
7 Up Bottling Co. - Misc. mdse.
475.00
10401
Northern States Power Co. - Utilities
718.33
10402
Yonak Sanitation - Garh2go Contract
82.50
10403
Maus Foods - Misc. supplies
31.99
10404
C.K. Hardware - Misc. supplies
26.07
10405
Gruys, Johnson 6 Ass.
110.00
10406
Viking Coca Cola - Misc. mdso.
928.25
10407
Jude Candy - Misc. mdso.
568.69
10408
Lovegren Ico
625.95
10409
Loifort Trucking - Hauling for month of August
325.50
10410
Trustee Industrial Fund - Group Insurance
276.58
10411
Bridgewater Telephone -Telephone
55.61
10412
Fd Phillips - Liquor
3,588.99
10413
Upton Advertising - Map for advertising
150.00
10414
Monticello Times - Publishing a Advertising
96.60
10415
Twin City Wine - Wino
549.31
10416
Griggs Cooper - Liquor
3,380.06
10417
Montical 10 Office Products - Supplies
20.44
10418
North Central Public Sorvice
8.60
10419
Payroll for Auguat 3,856.83
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $170,160.53
GENERAL FUND SEPTEMBER DISBURSEMENTS
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Lake Country Chapter - Reg. Fee for Fire Prevention Seminar
40.00
16191
Kearin's Landscaping - 40 ' pipe for sprinklers
28.00
16192
Bridgewater Telephone - Utilities
604.93
16193
North Central AWW - Operators School reg. for Walt Mack
35.00
16194
1st National Bank of Mpla. - Public funds account charge
4.00
16195
Olson Electric - Maintenance
1,270.23
16196
Lindberg 6 Sons - Paint for Park
14.42
16197
St. Cloud Fire Equip. - Service fire extinguisher
192.75
16198
Fair's Garden Center - Replacement trees 6 repotting plants
110.68
16199
Monticello Ready Mix - Concrete for Maintenance Building
2,157.34
16200
Coast to Coast - Supplies
141.35
16201
Golden Valley Furniture - 3 stools for Library
379.90
16202
The Plumbery - Service call at Library
27.00
16203
O.K. Hardware - Conduit for library
4.89
16204
Curtis Industries - Street Supplies
126.45
16205
MacQueen Equipment - Broom for Sweeper
265.23
16206
Wright County Sheriff - Police Contract for July
7,349.33
16207
Wright County Highway Department
188 04
19380
Big Lake Machine - Sharpen Chipper Blades
18.00
16210
Marco Business Products - Copy Machine repair
56.54
16211
Road Machinery 6 Supplies - Pump
6,779.00
16212
Viking's Approved Safety Products - AG Charger
36.50
16213
Cruys, Johnson 6 Assoc. - Computer processing for June
290.00
16214
MN. State Treasurer - Watercraft Receipt
25.00
16215
Mr. Charles Maldchek - Add'l summer salary
160.80
16216
Miss Amanda Chowen - Add'1 summer salary
26.80
16217 1
Mr. Robert Boedigheimer - Add'1 Su=cr salary
25:.60
16:!8
Kelly King - Add'1 summer salary
25.60
16219
State Capitol Credit Union - Scan Hancock withholding
25.00
16220
MN. State Treasurer - PERA
872.69
16221
III11 - Reg. fee for Batten Seminar for D. Jacobsen
125.00
16222
Gwen Bateman - Partial payment - cleaning dog pound
100.00
16223
Corrow Sanitation - Garbage Contract
3,672.00
16224
Monticello Township - Local government aid reimb. to Township
2,876.70
16225
Tom Eidem - MPELkA Conference expenses
125.85
16226
Wright County State Bank - 6 month C.D.
150,000.00
16227
Mrs. Lucy Andrews - Balance Due Info Center
57.20
16228
Mrs. Ed Schaffer - Balance Due Info Center
50.60
16229
Gerald Hermes - Janitorial Services at Library
115.00
16230
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll deductions
110.04
16231
State Treasurer - PERA W/H
1,481.17
16232
Wright County: State Bank - Purchase Fannie Mae Discounts
95,050.64
16233
Wright County State Bank - Purchase 6 month C.D.
250,000.00
16234
Minnesota State Treasurer - Watercraft Receipts
30.00
16235
James Preusse - Cleaning City Hall
220.00
16236
Mayor Arve Grimsmo - Mayor Salary
125.00
16237
Mr. Ilan Blonigen - Council Salary
100.00
16238
Mrs. Fran Fair - Council Salary
100.00
16239
Mt. Kett Maus - Council Salary
100.00
16240
Ur. Phil White - Council Salary
100.00
16241
YMCA of Mpls. - Contract Payment
258.33
16242
State Treasurer - Monthly FICA for August
3,619.85
16243
Cutmnissioner of Revenue - State Withholding for August
1, 799. OU
16244
Wright County State Bank - Federal Withholding for August
3,401,40
16245
GENERAL FUND SEPTEMBER
AMOUNT
CHECK NO
Applied Mgmt. Institute - Seminar for M. Hellman
165.00
16246
Walter Mack - Water School expense
151.58
167"-,
Mrs. Lucy Andres - Infer Center Salary
165.25
16. }
Mrs. Ed Schaffer - Final Payment for Salary at Info Center
159.75
16249
Mr. John Moon - 82 - 83 MIDA Dues
65.00
16250
Charles Malachek - Summer Help Salary
270.51
16251
U.S. Postmater - Stamps
296.00
16252
Minn. State Treasurer - Snowmobile Receipts
49.00
16253
Independent Lumber - Misc. Material
138.44
16254
Loren Klein - Reimb. for trip to Tracy
28.21
16255
Lester's, Inc. - Balance on Pole Building
1,937.00
16256
Matt Theisen - Mileage to St. Cloud
15.00
16257
Jim Miller - Mileage to School and local
128.50
16258
Paul A. Laurence Co. - Payment #19
110,435.60
16259
Gwen Bateman - Animal Imp. expense
589.88
16260
Gerald Hermes - Janitorial services at Library
115.00
16261
Hinn. State Treasurer - Watercraft Receipts
48.00
16262
State Farm Insurance - Reimb. for hydrant returned to City
(was previously paid by Insurance Co.)
275.00
16263
MN. Municipal Finance Officers Assoc. - MFOA Conference Reg. Fee
for Rick Wolfsteller
75.00
16264
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll Deductions
135.04
16265
Wright County State Bank - Daily Interest
45,000.00
16266
Void
----
16267
Monticello Fire Department - Fire Calls for Aug. 6 Sept.
385.00
16268
Northern States Power Co. - Utilities for August
5,209.41
16269
North Central Public Service Co. - Gas for unmlh of August
63.77
1627n
Trustee Industrial Fund -- Group Insurance
2,451.99
162'
Charles Malachek - Salary
241.20
1627s
State Capitol Credit Union - S. Hancock's withholding
25.00
16273
Safety Kleen Corp. - Maint. agreement on Parts s Washer
51.05
16274
Our Own Hardware - Mis. material and parts
450.72
16275
Loren D. Klein - Mileage 6 Misc. expense
166.00
16276
J. M. Oil Company - Gas and pump hose
1,850.95
16277
Fair's Garden Center - Trees for cemetery 6 7th St. Project
207.50
16278
National Bushing - oil filters s Misc, supplies
54.47
16279
Coast to Coast - Garbage bags c Misc. supplies 6 parts
114.17
16280
buffalo Bituminous - 84 yds. Class 5 for landscaping at Maint.
Building c for street repairs
294.00
16281
Moon Motors - Repairs to John Doors 6 Grease gun
49.50
16282
Jerry's Auto Salvage - iWater Core for 72 Chev Pickup
20.00
16283
North Central Chemical - 55 gallons of weed killer
594.00
16284
Centra Sots - Grana aced and chain hook
153.00
16285
Lindberg Paints - Burlap Material for City Hall
151.91
16286
Monticollo Ready Mix - 9 gallon scalar for concrete floor - Maint,Bld.
87.75
16287
Laof Brothers - Uniforms for August 1982
104.40
16288
Mobil Oil - Can, oil and repairs
204.31
16289
Gould Brothers Chov. - Repair to gas tank - 65 Chov Fire Truck
66.00
16290
Orr-Scholon-Mayeron 6 Associates - Engineering Fees
21,541.54
16291
Nnerican National Bank - Bond Payment
24,462.50
16292
The Economics Press - Subocription Renewal
22.75
16293
narl F. Anderson 6 Associates - Signa
138.43
16294
Rick Wolfutelior - Milcayc from July to 9/15/82
31.00
1629
J
Golden Valley Furniture - Truck Rental - Library Move a Book Pickmp 175.00
16291,
GENERAL FUND SEPTEMBER AMOUNT
CHECK NO
Feedrite Controls - Testing, poly phosphates, chlorine, etc.
1,680.00
16297
Fylos Backhoe - Digging manhole at WWfP, latrine rental NSP Park
665.00
16298
Monticello Times - Publishing 6 Advertising
525.64
16299
Holmes 6 Graven - Prof Fees for Tax Increment Financing Plan
247.50
16300
Flicker's T.V. - Install antenna, etc. at Library
152.70
16301
D/B's Fastners - Log Chain Parts
68.55
16302
Commission of Employee Relations - Processing charge for S.S. consrib.
18.30
16303
Van Bergen 6 Marksbn, Inc. - Drive shaft for clarifier at WWTP
305.00
1G304
Twin City Testing - Concrete cylinder tested at Ellison Park
48.00
16305
Minnesota Valley Testing - Sewer sample testing
134.24
16306
Wright County Auditor - 1/2 police fines for August 1982
600.75
16307
Geyer Rental - Power Trowel Rental - Pole Building Floor
55.90
16308
Wilhelm's Tree Service - Tree Removal 6 Cutting
960.00
16309
Olson Electric - Repair sump pump s install at reservior
417.79
16310
Electosy Chamber Ensemble - Open House Library performance
85.00
16311
Mr. Steven Budas - Open House - Open House Mime Performance Librany
100.00
16312
I.U.O.E. Local 049 - Union dues withholding
84.00
16313
Monticello Printing - Envelopes
52.90
16314
Mayor Arve Grimsmo - Mileage to Tracy, MN.
77.00
16315
Tom Eidem - Mileage to Buffalo, etc.
107.50
16316
Water Products - water meters, hydrant part, pump hose
2,352.78
16317
Maus Foods - Misc. supplies
36.61
16318
Gopher Sign Company - Fluorescent paint
62.90
16319
Flexible Pipe Tool - Hydraulic filters, swivel for newer rudder
274.70
16320
Monticello Office Products - Office supplies, etc.
109.49
16321
St. Cloud Fire Equipment - Fire extinguisher - Senior Citizens B1Dg.
86.50
16322
Howard Dahlgren - Planniny Cees fun Boyle DevelulmienL
72i.96
iG323
Smith, Pringle 6 Hayes - Legal Foos from 5/82 to 8/82
1,728.00
16324
Campbell Abstract Company - Fees for 5th St. R.R.
35.50
16325
Central McGowan - Cylinder rental charge
2.48
16326
National Life Insurance Company - Tan Eidem's pension
65.00
16327
Century Laboratories - Supplies
47.26
16326
vavis Electronic - Batteries s 2 pager repairs
47.64
16329
Diamond Vogel Paint - Repair parts for Stripper
147.22
16330
State Treasurer, Surplus Property Fund - Misc. Tools 6 Parts
46.G0
16331
Maus Tire Service - Bolen's Tire Repair
4.50
16332
Barney'a Fix it Shop - 10 Pager covers at 7.00 each
70.00
16333
Liefert Trucking - Freight on water motors, etc.
45.00
16334
VWR Scientific Inc. - Misc. ouppliea for WWfP
470.65
16335
Central Minn. Association of City Managaro - Dues for Tam Eidem
5.00
16336
Bergstrom's Lawn s Garden - Parts for Bolens
160.02
16337
The Plummery - Repair to men's toilet at City Hall
38.36
16338
1•hillipa Petroleum - Tire repair to John Doero, and oil
18.71
14339
Monticello Ford - Body repair for 78 GMC Pickup
205.00
16340
Floor Care Supply - 20' entrance matt
235.20
16341
Equitable Life Insurance - Inc. withholding for Theisen s Monsen
40.00
16342
Groat River Regional Library - Stereo headsets, T.V., video recordrr
3,709.91
16343
Stokes Marine - Bolt, keys ate for cadet tractor mower
20.45
16344
St. Cloud Restaurant Supply - Towels, garbage hags, shampoo
112.12
16345
20th Century Plantico - magazine covers
118.74
16346
1st Bank Minneapolis - Public funds charge
4.00
16347
Kiplingor - Kiplinger Tax Letter Subscription
30.00
16348
Walter's Cabinet Shop - Formica G Cement for Counter - Maint. Bldg
48.00
16349
Gruys, Johnson - Computer processing for July, 1982
290.00
16350
Joanne Link - Primary Election G Treasury
40.50
16351
Northwestern Ball - Firs Phone
50.32
16352
GENERAL POND SEPTFABER
AMOUNT CHECK NO.
Marlene Hellman - Mileage to seminar on 9/14/82 30.00
Diane Jacobson - Mileage to seminar on 9/23/82 28.00
Marge Bauer - Reimburse petty cash funJ 374.63
State Treasurer - Membership fee to allow City to purchase surplus items 25.00
Allied Blacktopping - Sealcoating Project 80,805 sq. yds.@.337 27,231.29
Burlington Northern - Sanitary Sewer Crosssing Permit thru 10/87 25.00
Void -------
Harry's Auto - Parts and supplies 528.73
Northstar Waterworks - Material for Hart Blvd. waterline extensior 684.79
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone 763.14
Marco Business Products - office supplies 148.05
Payroll for August 1982
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS
Q
19,796.77
$822,257.30
16353
161
163_./
16356
16357
16358
16359
16360
16361
16362
163,63
J
GENERAL FUND SEPTEMBER DISBURSEMENTS AMOUNT
Anne Voll. - wages for Primary Election and Training
Colleen De Boer
Jeanette Host
Cynthia Kjellberg
Herman Bush
Cecil Kolling
Caro)yn Phillips
Adeline Pierce
Betty Land
Laona Kline
Lucille Clausen
Ruth Harstad
Marvel Trunnoll
Don Nagel V
Wright County Sheriff's Department - Police Contract August 81
Total of this page
GRAND TOTAL OF ALL BILLS
45.75
40.50
40.50
9.00
45.75
45.75
48.00
45.75
46.00
42.75
30.00
24.75
24.75
32.25
7.349.33
7,672.83
$830,130.13
CHECK NO
16364
16365
16366
16367
16368
16369
16370
16371
16372
16373
16374
16375
16376
16377
16378