City Council Agenda Packet 11-22-1982AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
November 22, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve A. GrimEmo.
Council Members: Phil White, Fran Fair, Dan Blonigen, Ken Maus.
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of the Minutes of the November 8, 1982 Regular Meeting
and Minutes of the November 15th, 1982 Special Meeting.
3. Petitions, Requests, Complaints/Citizens Comments.
Old Business.
4. Public Hearing - Meadow Oak Subdivision.
5. Consideration of a Request by Meadow Oak Developer's to Commence
the Preparation of Plans and Specifications and to defer some
Special Assessments.
6. Consideration of the Proposed Law Enforcement Contract - Estab-
liahing hours of Coverage. Addendum - Sheriff's Quarterly
Report.
7. Consideration of Change Orders #66 through #71 with the Paul A.
Laurence Company on the Wastewater Treatment Plant Construction
Contract.
Now Businoso.
B. Consideration of Job Descriptions for Laborer/Mechanic and
wastewater Treatment Plant Assistant Superintendent and Calling
for Applicants.
9. Consideration of a Request by the HRA to hold a Public Hearing
for Tax Increment Financing on December 13, 1982 at 7:30 P.M.
10. Consideration of Making a Loan to the HRA for the Purpose of
Their Acquiring Lot 7, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park.
11. Consideration of a Conditional Una Permit for Auto Repair Buai-
nose - Pat Townsend.
12. Consideration of a Proposal to Enter a Cable T.V. Project De-
volopment with other Cities.
13. Consideration of Bills for Month of November, 1982.
` 14. Adjournment.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
November B, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Phil White.
Members Absent: Dan Blonigen.
2. Approval of the Minutes for October 25, 1982.
A motion was made by Fair, seconded by Maus to approve the
minutes of the regular meeting held on October 25, 1982.
Voting in favor was Fair, Maus, and Grimsmo with White ab-
staining due to his absence at the last meeting.
A motion was made by White, seconded by Maus and unanimously
carried to approve the minutes of the special meeting held
on November 4th, 1982 which certified the election results.
4. Continuation of Public Hearinq on Proposed Public improve-
ments for Meadow Oak Subdivision.
At the request of the developers, the public hearing was
again continued until the next regular Council meeting of
November 22, 1982.
5. Consideration of an Offer to Purchase Block 32. (The Oakwood
Block).
In September, 1982, two individuals had expressed interest in
purchasing portions of what is known as the Oakwood Block in
downtown Monticello. Dr. Brion of the Northwest Community
Clinic expressed interest in purchasing approximately one-
half (S) acre of the Oakwood Block for a Medical Clinic and
Security Federal Savings 6 Loan Association expressed interest
in purchasing a portion of the block for a new branch office.
In addition, Security Federal also requested that the City
delay any action on any sale of the property to enable them
to study the possibility of acquiring the entire Block 32
and developing the entire block.
Mr. Warren Tiogen, President of Security Federal, .,as present
at the Council meeting to present an offer of $150,000 for
the purchase of the entire Block 12. Mr. Tiagen noted that
they would be interested in doing a Planned Unit Development
of the entire block with a mix of retail and office spaces
along with the oventoal relocation of their Savings c Loan
facility.
Council Minutes - 11/8/82
Concerns were expressed by Council members that previously the
City had obtained an appraisal of the property a few years ago
which indicated that its value might be in the neighborhood of
$350,000 and the concensus of the Council was that $150,000
cash for the property may not be sufficient to warrant the sale.
It was Councilman White's position that the entire Oakwood
Block should be worth in the neighborhood of $250,000.
Mr. Tiegen of Security Federal noted that their organization
would be willing to negotiate with the City further in regard
to acquiring the entire block or if the City felt they would
sell off only a portion of the block. Security Federal would
also be interested in just enough for their own future ex-
pansion needs.
It was the Council concensus to have the City Administrator
work with and negotiate with Security Federal Savings 6
Loan Association to establish a better price for the City
and also review the possible option of Security Federal only
purchasing a portion of the block for their needs.
In addition, a motion was made by Ren Maus, seconded by Phil
Whit. to tall. th. orfar Dr. Brion. of _nn.
Clinic regarding the purchase of a portion of the block
until such time as negotiations are completed with security
'— Federal.
6. Consideration of Taking a Purchase Ontion on Lots 13 and 14,
leas the Southerly 15 feet of. Lot 15 in Block 51.
Previously, the Monticello Development Corporation, owner of
Lots 13. 14 and 15 in Block 51 indicated a desire to sell this
property to the City of Monticello. Thu buildings on thin
property are in a deteriorated state and the area in question
would be included in the proposed tax increment financing
district that the City is currently establishing.
An agreement has boon worked out whereby the City could
make a purchase option on the property for six months thereby
establishing the right to purchase the property anytime during
the first six months of the option. For these first six months,
the City would be required to pay the interest duo on the mort-
gage on the property through 14ovembor 9th, 1982 and the insur-
ance premium which is presently past dus,with those two amounts
totalling $6,844.00. In addition, the option agreement would
also provide for an automatic extension for an additional nix
months whereby the City would be required to pay interest' that
wan due from November 9th, 1982 through May 9th, 1983 which
- 2 <� .
Council Minutes - 11/8/82
would be approximately $2,430.00. Under this option agreement,
the City of Monticello could acquire the land any time within
the first six months or within the second six months.
If the tax increment financing plan is established and a de-
veloper was interested in this parcel of land for some de-
velopment, the HRA Committee would more than likely buy the
property from the City of Monticello and offer it to a de-
veloper.
A motion was made by Maus, seconded by Fair to enter into an
agreement for the purchase of an option by the City of Monti-
cello from the Monticello Development Corporation for Lots 13,
14 and 15 of Block 51 with the expenditure of $6,310.00 for
past due interest and $544 for insurance premiums. Voting in
favor was Maus, Fair, Grimsmo and abstaining was Phil White
duo to a possible conflict of interest.
It was noted that after the purchase option agreement is com-
pleted, it was the concensus of the Council that notice to
vacate the premises should be given to the party presently
renting one of the houses on the property indicating that
vacation of the premises must be completed by January 1, Ilibi.
7. Consideration of a Policy Proposed from the Downtown Parkinq
Committee.
A Downtown Parking Committee in in the process of reviewing
the present policy in regard to snow removal, etc. The
committee has not boon able to meet to discuss the issue and
as a result this item was tabled until the committee is able
to review and make recommendations to the Council.
8. Consideration of Chanqo Orders 062, 063, 064 and 065 on the
wastewater Treatment Plant Project.
The following Change Orders were recommended by tho Consulting
Engineer and City Staff for approval on the wastewater Treat-
mant Plant Project.
062 - An additional amount of $3,409.00 for minor electrical
changes at various locations.
063 - An additional $711.00 for electrical shut offs in the
chlorine room for the chlorinators and lank dotoctor.
064 - An additional coot of $3,749.00 for sidewalks to the
filters and main digester building.
064 - A deduct of $98.00 from quantity oatimatoo on the in-
terceptor sower construction.
- 3
Council minutes - 11/8/82
The net total addition of these four change orders amounts to
;7,771.00. A motion was made by Fair, seconded by White and
unanimously carried to approve change orders 062 through 465
with the Paul A. Laurence Company on the Wastewater Treatment
Plant Improvement Project for an additional amount of
$7,771.00.
9. Consideration of Appointments to the Monticello Housinq and
Redevelopment Authority.
In an effort to revitalize the Monticello IiRA Committee, four
out of the five present members have indicated they will be
resigning their positions and have asked that the City Council
appoint replacements. The persons who need to be replaced
and their expiration dates are as follows:
Leo Nelson Chairman 12-31-82
Ken Tvedt 12-31-83
George DeMars 12-31-86
Robert Doty 12-31-86
Mayor Urlmsmo noted that four individuals have expressed in-
tereat in serving on the Committee as follows:
Don Cochran Bud Schrupp
Jack Reeves Phil white
It was noted that Councilman White agreed to assume the final
interim position of chairman held by Leo Nelson which expires
December 31, 1982.
A motion Mae made Fair, seconded by Mauu and unanimously carried
to approve Lho appointments of Don Cochran, Bud Schrupp, Jack
Reeves and Phil White to Lhe recently vacated ]IRA Committee
positions with a notation that the committee members are to work
out among themselves what length of term they wish to carve.
10. Consideration of Gran U nq a Ruzoninq Request and Conditional
Uou RoquosL by Mrs. Ina Carlson and Mr. Prod Gillo.
Upon the death of Ina Carlson a few months ago, Mr. Carlson's
welding shop was discontinued and subsequently the equipment
was cold. At the time of Mr. Carlson's death, his welding
business was located within an R-1 zone whore it was a non-
conforming use which woo permitted under the grandfather
clause. However, since Mr. Carlson's death, the welding
business has been discontinuod and Kra. Carlson now would
Council Minutes - 11/8/82
like to utilize the building at this time for rental income
by renting the facility to the abutting property owner Mr.
Fred Gille who would like to expand his auto sales business.
In order to do so, it is necessary that the property be re-
zoned from R-1 residential, to B-3 commercial business to
allow this.
At the public hearing held by the Planning Commission, several
objections were heard from neighbors in the area who felt the
property should remain residential according to the compre-
hensive city plan and should not be rezoned to commercial uses.
As a result of the testimony provided at the Planning Commission
meeting, the Planning Commission denied the rezoning request and
also the conditional use permit request made by Mr. Gille to ex-
pand his auto sales unto this property.
After reviewing the items presented at the Planning Commission
public hearing, a motion was made by Fair, seconded by White,
and unanimously carried to deny the rezoning request from R-1
to B-3 for the Carlson property. In addition,a motion was
made by white, seconded by Fair and unanimously carried to
deny a conditional use permit request by Fred Gills for use
of this property for expansion of his auto sales business.
11. Consideration of Sattinq a special Meatinq for the Express
Purpose of Establishing 1983 Salaries for Non -Union Personnel.
By Council consensus, a special meeting was oat for Tuesday,
November 30, 1982 at 6:30 P.M. for the purpose of reviewing
and establishing the 1983 salaries for non-union personnel.
The City Administrator was directed to negotiate with each
employee prior to the November 30, 1982 meeting and if at
all possible arrive at a salary range as acceptable to both
the employee and the administrator. This information will
than be presented to the Council at the special meeting. In
addition, it was noted that if the City Administrator and
the employer during their negotiations agree on a percentage
increase or a salary range for 1983, it will be the option
of the employee if he wants to attend the special meeting
himself to review the proposed salary with the City Council.
12. Consideration of the Acceptance of the 1983 law Enforcemant
Contract with Wriqht County Sheriff's Department.
Recently, the Wright County Board established an hourly rate
for police sorvicoo which are contracted to county munici-
polities for 1903. The hourly rate proposed results in a
15% increase to $15.25 per hour.
0
Council Minutes - 11/8/82
Currently, the City of Monticello contracts for 7,488 hours
of annual police protection which under the new rate of $15.25
per hour would amount to an annual cost of $114,192.00. Under
the recently adopted 1983 City Budget, approximately $108,000
was budgeted for police protection which would result in the
actual cost exceeding the budget by alittle over $6,000.00.
Discussion occurred by the Council on whether the City of
Monticello should consider going to complete 24 hour a day
coverage which would under the current rate result in an annual
charge of approximately $133,600.00. If so, this would amount
to over $25,000 more than was budgeted for in 1983. It was
noted that although the rate charged by the County has been
established, the hours of coverage is an item that can be set
by the City Council and as a result, it was the concensus of
the Council to table until the next regular Council meeting
any action on the contract to provide for more input on whether
increased hourly coverage to 24 hours per day should be con-
sidered by the City.
Meeting Adjourned.
Rick Wolfateller
Assistant Administrator
T
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 1982 - 7:00 A.M.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmc' Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Ken Maus,
Phil White,' ird City Administfator, Tom Eidem.
Membero Absent: None.
A special meeting of the City Council was duly he}d at 7100 A.M. on
ryovember 15th, 1982, in the City Mall.
The Mayor noted that the meeting was called by him to discyss a per-
sonnel matter regarding Loren Klein, City Zoning Administrator/puild-
ing Official. Mayor'Grimsmo asked Eidem to provide some backgrpund.
Eidem explained the events that led to this meeting, the alleged
charges against Mr. Klein, b9th work and non -work related, and j+ry
he felt that some kind of action was needed. He stated Phat eonver-
sationa had been hold with Mr.'�lein, and that Mr. Klein had rer-'
quested that the City consider the possibility that a leave of ab-
sence be granted so that he might seek out pr96geional help to sort
out soma personal prpblems. Councilman Blonigon stated that a leave
of absents implied that Mr. Klein could resun@`gs Autiqq at sonic
time in the future, which he (plonigen) did not, think vippld be ,pos-
oible. The other meabero of thb Council concurred, '
Eidem suggested that the Council mandate, and Pay for, a professional,
evaluation for Mr. Klein, and upon receipt of a thorough diagnoeoq,
the Council could then decide upon a course of•'act>on.
Mr. Klein arrived at'thia time, •and the previous discussion was ro-
lated to him. Mr. Klein said he-wao satiofied•vith the propoacd
approach, but he hoped that he might at loaet leave the pption•opon
of returning to work,Mith the City. Eidem explained that ouch in
option did not look favorable because either hla'evalyatiop would
reflect that Mr. Klein ion't'cvmpatible for- thib'posltioA,'or that
ho really did not have any difficultios, in ehico @aso,'too charges
alleged would be filed and tfie•'City would coapeonce with termination
for cause procoodingo. Mr. Klein said he undar6io0d,�hi9, but still
prefo=rod to hope thsk he could retain his posittoh.
A motion by White, seconded by rain to mandate a profeggional ovaly-
ation, tho results of which will be considorgd by the Coupcil no
later that January 10th, 1981, (sooner if ayailiplq)'`nq'to authoiire
payment for this evaluation. **Motion carried ugenlisoualy.•
- 1 -
Council member Maus asked if action was necessary to give a leave
of absence, but Klein stated that he would use his accumulated
sick leave beginning November 15th, 1982.
Mayos Grimsmo noted that Mr. It1ein should turn in all his city
keys and other city property that was currently in his pGssession.
Klein acknowledged that he wopld do that.
drimamo adjourned the meeting.
Thomas A. Eidem
City Administrator
.1
CWM
i
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
AGENDA SUPPLEMENT
4 5 5. Public Hearinq - Consideration of a Request by Meadow Oak
Developers to Commence the Preparation of Plans and Specs
and to Defer Some Special Assessments.
In this past week I have talked with Bob Bemboom about the
Meadow Oak project. He has indicated that he and other mem-
bers of the development will attend Monday evening's meeting
so that the public hearing can actually convene and indepen-
dent of the hearing to submit a request that the plans and
specs be authorized and submit a proposal for the deferral
of some special assessments. At my suggestion, the developers
have prepared the proposal, a copy of which is in your ref-
erences, that address payment for plans and specs as well as
a repayment plan for the deferred special assessments. it is
my understanding that they are fully prepared to enter this
type of a contract so that the City is indemnified against
any expense loss. According to Mr. Bemboom, what they wish
to do is formally present this proposal to you on the 22nd
with the intention of being present on the 13th at which
time they would hope action would be taken. They are re-
questing no action whatsoever at this time. They do intend
to got the proposal to me in time to accompany this agenda
so that any questions you may have or certain negotiation
asl,ects that nay he rnis-1 c?in M discunsM on the 22nd and
I incorporated into a final agreement document for execution
an the 13th. With respect to the land ownership, I have in-
formed them that they should be prepared to fully address
this question at the 22nd meeting. Mr. Bemboom indicated
that they have already worked out the financial arrangements
so that Mr. Boyle can take clear title prior to the 13th,
and he indicated that he will discuss thia at length with
you on tho 22nd.
- 1 -
Jim T. Boyle
9826 North 46th Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85028
November , 1982
City of Monticello
City Hall
Monticello, Minnesota 55313
RE: Request for Deferral of Special Assessments
Gentlemen:
The following request is submitted to the City of
Monticello ("City") in connection with the proposed development
of a six hundred acre tract of land (the "Boyle Property")
which I purchased from Maurice Hoglund in 1975 under a contract
for deed. I have also sold a one-half interest in a 280 acre
parcel of the Boyle Property to Ronald Offutt of Moorhead,
Minnesota. Although Mr. Hoglund isJtill the fee simple o:;ncr
of the Boyle Property and Mr. Offuttretains an interest in a
portion of the Boyle Property, I am now negotiating with both
parties to purchase their interests in the property and become
the sole owner. I hope to conclude this transaction within the
next 45 days.
The Boyle Property is situated at the southeasterly city
limits of the City and is bordered on the north by Interstate
494, on the west by Fallon Avenue, and on the southerly and
easterly boundaries by the City limits. Mr. Hoglund has
retained sole ownership of a 30 acre parcel of land immediately
to the north of the Boyle Property on the north side of
Interstate 494 (the "Hoglund Property"). Meadow Oak Limited
Partnership ("Meadow Oak") has applied for and received concept
approval from the Monticello City Council for the development
of a 177 acre tract of land contained within the Boyle Property
(the "Meadow Oak Parcel"). Meadow Oak intends to develop the
Meadow Oak Parcel as a mixed residential community consisting
of three types of housing: conventionally constructed single
family homes (95 homesites) and manufactured homes installed on
individual lots as single family and multi -family dwellings
(441 homesites).
In 1976, the City determined that water utility service
could be provided to the Meadow Oak Parcel if a new 24 inch
water trunk line (the "Water Line") were constructed across the
� bs
City of Monticello
Page 2
Northerly portion of the Boyle Property. The new Water Line
would extend the existing water trunk line from its termina-
tion point in the Oakwood Industrial Park to the Meadow Oak
Parcel. The City has advised me that the City would only
require me to pay for the cost of a lateral water line and that
the City would pay for the cost of oversizing the water line to
serve future developments in this part of the City. The City
also determined that sanitary sewer service could be provided
to the Meadow Oak Parcel by the installation of a 6 inch
forced line and lift station (the "Sewer Line"). The Sewer
Line would proceed Southerly across the Hoglund Property and
terminate within the headow Oak Parcel.
Based upon the financial limitations imposed upon Meadow
Oak, it appears that Readow Oak will not undertake the
development of the Meadow Oak Parcel unless the special
*assessments arising from the installation of the water
Line are at least partially deferred. In addition to these
economic constraints, Meadow Oak has indicated that the
development of the Meadow Oak Parcel will not be feasable at
d11 ujiluss the Water Line and 4cwcr Linc are installed and
operating by the summer of 1983. Meadow Oak believes this will
be impossible unless the City Immediately commences work on
these utility lines by ordering final plans and specifications.
It appears, therefore, that if the Meadow Oak project is to
proceed, two requirements must be satisfied. First, the
special assessments for the Water Line must be deferred and
secondly, engineering plans and specifications for the Water
and Sewer Line must be completed as soon as possible.
In order to satisfy these requirements, I propose the
following to the City:
1. Special Assessments. Special assessments for the
Water Line and Sewer Line shall be handled as follows:
A. Financinq of Water and Sewer Line. The City
will not require any down payment from anyone with respect
to these utility lines. In addition, the entire cost of
the Water Line and Sewer Line will he financed with the
proceeds of a bond issue which will be repaid over a term
which is now anticipated to be from 10 to 15 years. The
G-Pecial asnesaments resulting from the construction of the
Water and Sewer Lines will be repaid over the same term as
these bonds. it financial conditions will only permit the
City to issue bonds having a term less than 10 years, the
City must give me an opportunity to determine whether or
City of Monticello
Page 3
not to proceed with the construction of these utility
lines. If I decide that the cost of financing these
utility lines over such a short term is too great, then I
shall have the right to advise the City to terminate this
entire project and my agreement to bear the special
assessments for these utility lines shall be withdrawn.
B. Water Line. Special assessments for the
installation of the Water Line from the Westerly boundary
of the Boyle Property to the Westerly border of. the Meadow
Oak Parcel will be assessed solely against the Boyle
Property, excluding the Meadow Oak Parcel. In other
words, no portion of the cost of the installation of the
Water Line will be assessed against the Meadow Oak Parcel.
In addition, these assessments will not become payable
until the first of the following events occurs:
(i) The end of a six year period commencing
with the date of issuance of any bonds issued by the
City, the proceeds of which are earmarked by the City
for the construction of the Water Line, or
(ii) As soon as a total of 50 acres or more of
the Boyle Property, exclusive of the Meadow Oak
Parcel, has been developed. However, a pro rata
share of the total assessment shall become payable as
each portion of this property is developed even if
less than 50 acres have been developed.
In addition, once the total assessments become payable
following the occurence of (i) or (ii) above, the total
amount of the unpaid assessments together with interest
which has accrued thereon prior to the date such
assessments become payable, shall be reamortiaed and
payable over the remaining term of the bonds which
originally financed the construction of the Water Line.
C. Sewer Line. All special assessments arising
from the installation of the Sewer Line across the Hoglund
Property would be assessed against the Meadow Oak Parcel.
In order to install the Sewer Line, it will be necessary
to obtain a public easement across the Hoglund Property.
Mr. Hoglund has indicated his willingness to grant such an
casement but only if no portion of the cost of the Sewer
Line is assessed against the Hoglund Property.
City of Monticello
Page 4
T
D. Installation of Water and Sewer Line within
Meadow Oak Parcel. Meadow Oak has also agreed that the
cost of installing the Water and Sewer Lines from the
border of the Meadow Oak Parcel to points within the
Meadow Oak Parcel may be assessed solely against the
Meadow Oak Parcel.
2. Engineerinq Plans and Specifications. In order to
meet the deadlines established by Meadow Oak, it will be
necessary for the City to order promptly final plans and
specifications for both the Water and Sewer Lines. If the City
orders these engineering plans and specifications for delivery
by December or January, I will agree to indemnify and hold the
City harmless from any costs or expenses incurred by the City
with respect to these items as follows:
A. If construction of the Water and Sewer Lines has
not been commenced by , 1983, I will
immediately reimburse the City for all of the City's
out-of-pocket costs paid to the Citv's consulting
engineers for the preparation of the final plans and
specifications for the Water and Sewer Lines. I will also
agree to reimburse the City for any additional out-of-
pocket costs paid by the City which are related to these
utility lines but only if the City has first obtained my
written approval before incurring any such costa.
B. If construction of the water and Sewer Line has
commenced by , 1983, the City will
agree that the cost of the final plans and specifications
will be included with all of the construction costs and
assessed against the various parcels as outlined above.
If the foregoing proposal is acceptable to you, please
indicate your acceptance by signing this proposal in the
indicated space and by returning it to me.
Very truly yours,
Jim T. Boyle
JTB:th
cc: Mr. Maurice Hoglund
Meadow Oak Limited Partnership
r
City of Monticello
Page 5
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO this day of
1982.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
By
Thomas Eidem, City Manager
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
6. Consideration of A Proposed Law Enforcement Contract - Establish-
ing hours of Coverage. Addendum - Sheriff's Quarterlv Report.
As I understand it, Sheriff Wolff, Deputy Powers, and Deputy Gay
will be in attendance at the meeting Monday night. I have worked
various sets of figures to try and get the maximum amount of
coverage and still stay within the City budget. One of your
reference sheets shows the break down of the old schedule, that is,
the schedule that has been in existence for quite some time, but
prior to the added coverage you stipulated as an experiment earlier
this fall. On that sheet you will note that there are some half
hour figures. I included those half hours because although we do
not pay for them because they are the officer's lunch breaks, if
there were a call at that time we actually would get a response
from the officer. So, in a technical sense we got the extra half
hour of coverage. Based on the existing schedule, we would have
just under $7,000 budget surplus using the new proposed hourly
rate. That surplus translates into an additional 460 hours
annually, 38 hours monthly or 8.8 hours weekly. These are hours
that could be added onto the original schedule, but still keep us
within budget. If, rather than suggest 16 hours weekly, we sug-
gest 38 hours additional coverage monthly, and allow the sheriff's
offire to srhedule. those hours at their discretion, we. would maxi-
mize the budget and the hours for which we are paying. If we were
to keep the 16 hours weekly that we added this fall as a regular
coverage, we would then be paying for a 144 hours weekly at a cost
of $114,192 which is $5692.00 over budget. While the added hours
may be desirable in sane cases, for budgetary reasons, I would pre-
fer to see us enter the contract based on the actual budget figure
and then at some point in the future, if we aro able to operate
under budget in other departments, we could consider utilizing the
surplus to expand law enforcement coverage if such coverage was
warranted. Just for a reference point, were we to request 24
hour daily coverage year around, our cost would be $133,224.00.
ALTERNATE ACTION:
1. Adopt the contract based on the original schedule (Prior
to the 16 hour tout addition) of $101,504.00. This pro -
video us with the came coverage that we are accustomed to,
and keeps us under budget.
2. Adopt the contract reflecting the 16 hour increase at
$114,192.00. Thio would provide us with the came typo
of unexpected morning coverage but would create a budget
over run.
3. Request that item p9 of the contract be amended alightly
and that one now provision bo added. The amended version
would read, "9. The municipality hereby agroao to pay to
the County the cum of 6108,503.75 for law enforcement pro -
taction for 7,115 hours annually of daily patrol service
and 24 hour calla and general cervices from said sheriff's
office during said term of this agreement."
- 2 -
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
The new provision to be added to the contract would be in
language similar to the following: "The Sheriff or his
appointee shall establish the actual schedule of work, but
in no case shall coverage be less than 16 hours per day,
Sundays through Thursdays, nor less than 19 hours per day
on Fridays and Saturdays. These two changes would allow
the City to stay exactly on budget, but would maximize the
total number of hours of coverage. It also would allow for
the law enforcement people to use their discretion in terms
of the scheduling. I recommend this final alternative if
the Sheriff's Department is willing to go along with the
language changes. It strikes me that all these changes do
is assure us of avoiding a budget over run and that we yet
minimum coverage on specified days. Other than those two
factors, the law enforcement people would be responsible
for the decisions relating to actual coverage time. I hope
that prior to Monday evening, I will able to find time to
meet with Sheriff Wolff to discuss this so that this will
not come as a total surprise to him.
REFERENCES: A copy of Sheriff Wolff's cover letter, copy of the
law enforcement contract, copies of coverage data supplied by
Deputy powers at the last meet.ina.
- 3 -
Sunday through Thursday
12:30 P.M. to 9:00 P.M.
9:00 P.M. to 5:00 A.M.
LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT
WRIGHT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Old Schedule
8 hours X 5
8 hours X 5
165 hours actual coverage.
Fridays and Saturdays
9:30 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. e 8 hours X 2
6:00 P.M. to 2:30 A.M. 8 hours X 2
9:00 P.M. to 5:00 A.M. 8 hours X 2
1% hours actual coverage
Total hours paid for weekly
128 hours X 52 weeks a 6656 hours annually
X 15.25 1983 Rato
5 101,504.00
1903 eudgot - $108,500
Surplus basod on existing coverage $6,996.00
0�
40
40
16
16
16
126
k
7ARRELL L. WOLPP
county SherlM
Dear Council Members:
SHERIFF _OFFICE
Courthouse — Wdsm County -
- - BY1fAL0_M !SOTA 95313 _
taon•[me gency Stn. No. 682.3900 - -
Tall Freel•800.362.366T -
6t00 e.m.. 4130 P.m.
M
James F. Poww% Chief Deputy
24 Hour emergency Tetsoonee
8akalo 682.1162
M tro 473-873
Mantles--. 2932933.
_Oaten 972-2924
Coheto 286.6454
AmundN. 274-3039
November 1, 1982
The Wright County Board met on October 27 and discussed the cost for
providing police service to cities under contract. A motion was approved
to increase the hourly rate 151 or to $15.25 per hour. On a cost analysis,
it would break down as follows:
Salaries $ 11.00
Benefits 3.07
Insurance
Uniforms
PERA
Overtime/Court/Holiday, etc
Car Expenses 3.54
S 17.61
Allowance for fines returned 2.36
$ 15.25
There are no charges for training, administrative or investigation expenses
and numerous other incidentals.
Yours truly,
Darrell Wolff
Wright County Sheriff
DW:dl
s�r
M'y
!�In1`�_,tii 1 rs f i t
:
Cos, tlwnw-IirlslafCtwply, 'L.'; ° .• ' f.
■MALD. %R11Ui VA 15313 Jima P. PChLf DW
C taarCtna.s.eey'aUL 14. ii2-1200 ' �Ic ,.� ty Mmr ea sy Taasa.
Toa Few 1.100•!6?1667 s.feils.6ea1162
6,00 A...: atao PA - - KU1. 4734M
. . MewrMao 2667677
DA11111LL L M70LfP Det— 672•M4
meanly shvIN .CokM 2166454
An" 2744075
11-5-22
Honorable Mayor
City Council
City Manager
Monticello
Dear Sire:
This is a report on the additional car which has been used 8 times a month on a trial
basis allowinr for 24 hr. per day petrol in Monticello on thine days. This additional
car has been scheduled to allow for coverage durinp the early morning hours which are
not normally covered.
I scheduled the additional car on Sept. 8-9-16-17-20-27-28-29 and Oct. 8-12-13-19-20
25-26-29. neputies Gay, Correll, Diere and Lind worked the shifts.
'heir activity amounted to: 12 Citizen aide--45 warnings-7 traffic citations-
7 e5corts--36 car and subject checks --Fire Marshall assist—moved kids from thr,
parks 3 Limas--assisted the school 1 time-met with school officials 4 times
found 2 doors open--had a call on litering and a call on property damage.
I am enc osing th,• calls for servico by time of day for this period. Hope this gives
you an overview of the situation and aids you in determining future needs. I
might a71d that the activity, was not as Preat toward the end of the period as it was
toward the bepinninp. I think that drivers got the impression that someone in around
a 1 the time and curtailed some bad driving habits.
Tours truly
Jin Powars,
Chief Deputy
v
IS 0[t-82
MRIGM COMITY SIERIFF'S DFPYWTIEN'T
PAM 1
:Sz J1RIS: 31
• • • • f
POSSE
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ABALYSIS BY TIME OF DAY
09/01/82 JIM 09/30/82
HOW OF DAT
00 01 02
03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 IB 19 20 21 22 23
TOTAL
PE OF
TO TO TO
TO TO
TO TO TO TO TO TO 10 TO TO TO TO TO
TO TO TO TO TO TO TO
CALL
O1 02 03
04 05
06 07 08 09 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17
IB 19 20 21 22 23 24
L 14AM
1
I
MPLE ASSAIL T -M
1
1
LI- M(
1
1
2
D-WS4'K-LW
1
1
9-SMPLFT
2
1
3
ARTS FR MV
I
1
1 -MAIL
1
I
A
2 1 2
2 1 1 1
10
4 TTI -AUTOS
1
1
i ooh
1
?
3
/` NIJ-OT
1
I
bUt1111NVES
I
1
STfLS REPORT
1
I
D P-D1SCR CCN
1 1
1
3
0 PEACE
1
I
1{IO
2
2
V-TRESP5
1
1
ER CENTER LINE
1
I
2
EEO
1
1
I I
4
EED/RADIA
1
2
2 6 5 1 1 2 2
1
23
2 -*UL ENDORS
I
I
T01
I
I
LEGAL PARKIM;
1 2
3
:ELESS/RECN3 ES5
1
1 1 1
/
7fA' E ACCE
2
1
1 1 I
6
OP SIGH
1
1
WHORES
1
1
ONT dP -wr
I
1
UIPMEMT VICLATI
1
1
2
EN DOME
1
4 3 1
9
PARKIWj
I
1
ERTIME PA ANG
!
1
AfM VEHO41LES
1
1
A/DAS/DAC
I 1
1
3
NJKSOTA EL
I
I
AEGISTRAT
1
1
1
3
CED
.6ISTRAI ION D
I
I
ILIRE TO REPORT
1
I
IL TO STOP FOR
I
I
41. TO STOP FOR
I 1 1
3
ffi
Nt 1}OCT-81
IRIONT MffrY SIERIFF'S MPARTWfT
PAGE 2
S06 IRIS: 31
• •
1
POSSE
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY TIME OF DAY
09/01/82 TALI 09/30/82
NOIR OF DAY
00 01 02 03
04 Os 06 07 .08 09 10 it 12 13 14 Is
14.;17 18:.19.-20- 21 , 22 23
TOTAL
PE CF
TO TO TO TO
TO TO .TO TO .10 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO
TO MTM TO TO TO .TO. TO TO
:ALL
01 02 03 04
OS 06 07 00. 09. 10 11 11 13 14 15 16
17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24
IORCYO.E ME07IR
1
I
J(D PACPERTV
1
!
2
ERAL ESCORTS
1
1
2
ACCIDENTS - NO
2
1
3
AV
3
3, 2. 2 „ 2
12
,WINED OB,.EC
2
2
11 R ACCIODITS
1
3
4
EA DED(
I
1
TTERIIG
I
1
fPOtl OFFEMtSf
1
1
ILD AWM/NEOLE
I
I
0 6171
1
I
If. CALLS
I
I
pAR VIOLATION
I
1 I
I• 1
S
ONE CALLS
1 1 2 1
1
6
ICIDE IFETIALEI
1
1
EO: ON WELFARE
1
1
2
DICAL
I
1
`.SING PEASCM
1
I
MC KAM
I 1
I
3
rESTIC
1 1 I 1
4
If to AID
! 1
1
3
IOIelmn DIS?
1,
I
TORIST AID
!
I
IFIC LYI+FLAIINT
1
I
G CriPLA1NTS
1
1 l
3
IIIAL COMPLAINTS
1 l
I
3
LM DECKS
I 1 I
1 ! 1
6
0 IN LOCATING
1
1
fAMS
I
I
2
'PICIOIIS Pee"
I
I
D TO 0110 DTPA
1
I
COVERED STOLEN
1
I
IYICIOIS CIRCULI
2
I
1 ! 1
6
VIL
I
I
RIS! 31 TOTALS
8 S
S 8 1 9 S 7
11 14 6 Is
191
18 1
4 7 s 7 S 8
9 I4 13 9
ffi
m
IMRIOTT COINTY SEERIFF'S DEPARTWG
IRIS: 31
/110•
POSSE
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY TIME OF DAY
10/01/82 I'M 10/31/82
FOA OF DAY
00
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21
22 23
TOTAL
rK OF TO
TO TO TO TO TO TO TO
Tll TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO
TO TO TO TO TO
TO TO
CALL 01
0: 03 04 OS 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22
23 24
04M
1
1
2
XT -101 I
I
W -swirl
I
1
L4-FRTS FR FTV
I
I
'H TH-IUTOS
1
I
(ATH WE -WTO
I
1
11 PR -BIS
I
1
%4 PANT
1
1 I
1 2
6
VI PR—
1
1
M DFXM
1
1
4 OF—OT
I
l
f-WRB OL
I
I
UB P-DISOR CEM
I
2 2
5
IIt10
I 1
2
_TN-W,-Ol 1
I
,v-TRESPS
1
I
2
i1VING VIOLATION 1
I
.EA CENTER LIIE
I
I
'EED I
1
I 1 1
1
6
'EEO/RAO)R
I
I
'MLESS/RECKLESS
2
2
REASONABLE ACCP
1
1
fop SIO(
I
I
1
3
,RNINI; VIOLATION
I
I
ASSING VIOLATION
1
I
IUIPFENT VICIATI
1
1
:FN BOTTLE
2 2
4
WWI
1
1
l NINNESI)TA IT 1
1
tPIRFD AFGISTRAT
1
I
1 RFGISTRATIM 0
1
1
2
All TA SVP rro
7 1
3
t14O PQMFRTr
1
1
I
3
MAN FV'ITATS
2
1 2 J
7
"CIMYNTS - N)
I
I
J 1
1
4
i MV 7
J
4
11
r we I OENT
1
I
Q
PACE 1
RUNS 0-wV -07 WIM MIM C:AIFF'S DE9pMEW PROF 2
um ,IITISS 31 ♦ • • 4 •
POSSE
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY NKYSIS OY TIME OF MY
10101/82 T1iUt 10/31/82
man OF DAY
M 01 02 03 M (15 06 AT OR 119 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 TOTAL
TYPE OF TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TD TO TO TO TO Tti 10 TO TO TD TO TO TO TO Tti TO TO
ritt 01 40 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 19 20 21 72 23 74
PI -W -MV 4 4
N 6 R ACCIDENT i I
AREA CI£CK 1 1 2
coo"T TOR I i
SE1 OFFDa 1 1
FIRE CAULS 1 I
LIQM VIOLAIION I I
FIRFMS i I
Pwof CALLS I 1
PAUD t 1
MEDIfYU. 1 1 2
PURL IC PEACE 1 2 1 4
O(WRTIC 1 1 1 3
rltllFM AID 2 2
TWVIr NW AIRS 1 2 3
Amlow AYIIR AIN T4 I 1
(w% TY w/YINTYU I 1 7
wva rw(vc t 1 2
Alp TY IMAlty: I 1
N Am t i
SWIMS PFR" I
gVICIOUS WHICI
AID TO OPER CEPA I 1
grPtclats CIPI-IM I i I 1 1 2 7
riVtl I 1 1 3
JAISI 31 TOTALS R 2 3 1 4 6 4 3 0 12 1 15 138
5 7 4 5 3 4 1 3 6 it 17
AOKYI 0 TOTALS A 2 3 1 4 6 4 3 1 12 1 15 136
5 2 4 5 3 4 1 3 6 11 12
0�
L
LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT
TIIIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of ,I
I'
19_, by and between the County of Wright and the Wright County Sheriff, herein.
I !
after referred to as "County" and the
I
h=reinafter referred to as the "Municipality";
I
WITNESSETII:
WHEREAS, the municipality is desirous of entering into a contract with
the County for the performance of the hereinafter described law enforcement
i
protection with the corporate limits of said municipality through the county
I
sheriff, and
h'HEREAS, the County is agreeable to rendering such services, and
protection on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, such contracts are authorized and provided for by the nrovisianl
of Minn. Stat. 1957, See. 471.59 and Laws 1959, Chap. 372, and Minn. Stat. .Ann. 1961
See. 436.05;
! NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid statutes, it is
i
(agreed as follows:
1. That the County by way of the Sheriff agrees to provide police
i
i
�orotection within the corporate limits of the municipality to the extent and in
manner as hereinafter set forth:
a. Except as otherwise hereinafter specifically set forth,
such services shalln
ecomuuos ouiy' ties and functions o.` the typo
within the jurisdiction of the Wright County Sheriff pursuant to
Minnesota Laws and Statutes.
II b. Except as otherwise hereinafter provided for, as a standard
level of service provided shall be the same basic level of service !
I, which is provided for the unincorporated areas of the County of Wripht,
State of Minnesota.
e. The rendition of services, the standard of performance, the
discipline of the officers,and other matters incident to the performance
of such services and control of personnel so employed shall remain in
and undor the control of the Sheriff.
d. Such services shall include the enforcement of Minnesota
State Statutes and Laws and the municinal ordinances which arc of the
I same type and nature of Minnesota State Statutes and Laws enforced by
the Sheriff within the unincorporated territory of said County.
1. That it is agreed that the sheriff shall have full cooperation and
assistance from the aunicipality, its officers, agents and employees, so as to
facilitate the performance of this agreement.
0
Q
). That the county shall furnish and supply all necessary labor,
supervision, equipment, communication facilities for dispatching, cost of jail
detention, and all supplies necessary tc maintain the level of service to be
rendered herein.
4. The municipality shall not be liable for the direct payment of any
salaries, wages, or other compensation to any personnel performing services
herein for said County.
S. The municipality shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity
to any of the Sheriff's employees for injuries or sickness arising out of its
employment, and the County hereby agrees to hold harmless the municipality
against any such claims.
6. The County, Sheriff, his officers, and employees shall not be
deemed to assume any liability for intentional or negeligent acts of said
municipality, or any officer, agent, or employee thereof.
7. The municipality shall defend said Sheriff, his officers, agents,
or employees against, and hold harmless from, any claim for damages resulting
from the enforcement of any duly enacted municipal ordinance.
8. This agreement shall be effective from
to
9. The municipality hereby agrees to pay to the County the sum of
for lav enforcement protection for
hours per day of daily patrol service and 24 hours call and general
services from said Sheriff's office during. said term of this agreement.
10. If the annual salaries of the deputy sheriffs are increased at any
time during the term herein stated, this contract shall not be increased.
11. The municipality shall have the option of renewing this agreement
for an additional successive twelve-month period. To exercise this option,
the municipality shall notify the county administrator not later than sixty days
)rior to the expiration date of this agrecmcnt.
12. It is understood and agreed that the offenses for which arrests arp
mads pursuant to state statutes the county shall stand all costs of the courts
and its prosecution. When arrests are made under municipal ordinances of the
municipality, the municipal attorney shall prosecute such case. Any and all
fines collected shall be paid to the Weight County Treasurer's Office.
0—
13. Whereas; legislation has been enacted effective July 1, 1973,
making it mandatory that the County Court remit to all municipalities within
the said county, one half of all fines levied and collected from traffic vio-
lation arrests made in said municipality. And,
Whereas; it is understood that the contract fees is based upon
the County receiving the entire amount of'all fines.
It is understood that the Municipality shall return to the
Wright County Sheriff all fine monies received from the County. Said Munici-
pality shall remit by check no later than thirty (30) days from when said fine
monies are received by said Municipality.
14. For the purpose of maintaining cooperation, local control and
general information on existing complaints and problems in said municipality,
one member of the municipal council, the mayor, or other person or persons,
shall be appointed by said council to act as police commissioner/s for said
municipality, and shall make periodic contacts with and attend meetings with
the sheriff or his office in relation to the contract herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the municipality, by resolution duly adopted by its
governing body, caused this agreement to be signed by its mayor and attested by
its clerk, and the County of Wright, by the County Board of Commissioners, has
:aused these presents to be subscribed by the Wright County Sheriff and the
:hairman of said board and the seal of said board to be affixed thereto and
ittested by the clerk of said board, all on the day and year first above written
Mayor
Attest:
Clerk
BOARD OF U'RICHT COUITfY COMMISSIONERS
BY
Attest:
Clark, Board of County Commtssioners
(Z)
Chairman
Wright County Sheriff
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
7. Consideration of Change Orders 066, 067, 066, 069, 07C and 071 With
the Paul A. Laurence Company for the Wastewater Treatment Plant
Construction Company.
Change Order 066 - The portable air compressor furnished with a pre-
vious change order was not compatible with the welder which was to
use the same outlets. The outlets had to be converted to accommo-
date both single and triple phase. Cost of this change is $424.00.
Change Order 067 - The old incandescent light fixtures in the con-
trol building were in the way of new equipment and were in poor con-
dition and would not provide adequate lighting. Ten (10) fixtures
are to be replaced at a cost of $1,846.00.
Change Order 068 - This change order asks for funding for the water
main extension on Hart Blvd. and a thin blacktop mat on Hart Blvd.
in front of the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Total cost is 53,853.00.
Change Order 069 - Operations have revealed 3 safety hazards at the
Wastewater Treatment Plant.
1. The grit elevator is located in such a position as to make
servicing the unit almost impossible. It is necessary to
remove a portion of the wet well hand rail and add grating
to gain access to the elevator.
2. The now ladder down to the wastewater pumps has 3/4" round
galvanized treads which are very slippery and difficult to
climb or descend. It is necessary to weld on non-skid
treads.
3. The inlot trough to the primary clarifiers was left open,
it is necessary for operations personnel to cross this area
daily. Since this area is exposed to the weather, pre-
cautions must be taken to insure safety. Tile only answer
is to add grating over the trough. Mr. Jerry Carrick has
spent a great deal of time on negotiations with this change
order, however, due to small quantities and special orders,
the coat is $4,807 for the 3 additions.
Change order 070 - This change order involves repair of the 20 year
old final clarifiers which are intended to be used for intermediates.
Change Order 034 which the City executed in May of 1982 provided
the necessary materials for the rebuilding. At that time the City
opted to do the ropairo in Auguat with the ILolp of summer workers.
- 4 -
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
All the materials, however, never arrived until a few weeks ago.
while some of the material was being delivered, we learned the
new parts were not compatible with the old in size and much more
relocation of shafts and bearings would be needed than was
originally estimated.
Back in May of 1982, PALCO gave us a price for installation of
the parts of $7,594. Today their installation cost is $12,904.
The increase is due to three items.
1. PALCO made an error in their original bid.
2. Labor costs have increased because of union contract in-
creases and winter working conditions.
3. That PALCO does not really want the additional work at
this time.
This leaves us with three options.
1. Approve the change order and have PALCO install the parts
by December 31, 1982.
2. Have City crews install the parts with the help of hired
temporary help over the winter with no reimbursement.
3. Go out for bids next year and award to the lowest reepons-
�� ible bidder.
The plant is running satisfactorily (Below permit levels) at the
present time without the intermediate clarifiers and trickling
filters. However, the plant any run more efficiently with them
in use.
•NOTE: There may be a way to have this reimbursed with contin-
gency moneys after completion of the contract on Dec-
ember 31. Jerry Corrick can explain.
Chanqo Order 071 - This change order involves balancing quantities
for storm sower, Class V and black top quantities. Change Order
035 ioauod back in May of. 1982 adjustod estimated quantities and
prices but did not involve a dollar amount as final quantities
were unknown. If the final quantities had boon oxactly as those
cotimatod in change order 035,b lancing order 071 would have boon
for $10,730.00.
- 5 -
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
There were, however, some over runs. The storm sewer section
over ran approximately $1,200 due to additional pipe for catch
basin, leads, etc. The black top over ran approximately $3,000
($500 was for replacement of black top in front of dog pound due
to regrading). In addition the Class V over ran by $700. This
total addition amounted to $4,900 adding this to the original
$10,730 brings this change order to $15,630.00.
If change orders 65 thru 71 are approved the contingency fund
balance would be - $57,867.00.
REFERENCES: Enclosed cover sheets of Change Orders 65 thru 71.
- 6 -
I t I
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
crwinn baanreao
LAN eaewltags
oarsi scffEL.Enk 00 KI ax s ASSOkyaom INC W.
a oYlaoY or .�oa ro..wlt.Mre lec
i oast M(MManY .Ya bunt as MI t-kokq, to. M.t}aib U 14M Tee. name
..ontraetor Paul A. Laurgnce C - Chaps Oder No. 66
Addrabe P.O. Box 1267 10090 Highway 55 West rleold Pladif. MD. 11 5
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Pro}act No. 068-2748.01
job Location Monticello, Minnesota EPA grant lb.C270855-03
In accordance with the tate of your contract dated November 20 19 80 with
the City of Monticello Owner for WWTP Uagradinq and Appurtenant Work
row are hereby requested to Comply with the following changes from the contract Diana end speciflcatlonn
oeecrlption and Juetiflcanlon: - Refer to field Woolf / 11 5 (Attached)
To accoMModate the availahlp mn nr fnr the nnrtat, P air compressor.
revisions were LCcL.irf-d to the Welder receptacles.
lekdown of Costa this Change Order:
Labor ! Equipment (material Profit a OMarhead ( Total Add Total Deduct
$234.00 1 $135.00 1 $55.00 ! 5424.00
,Aount of Olpinel Contract, 3 4,704,000.00
Total Contract
:ontract Thru C.O. it 65 Total Addlflom Total Deduct Thru TAIa C.O. / 66
$4,863,603.07 1 $424.00 =$4,864,027.07
,rlotnal Con,Inpanclaa (Sit S
adn Rrainiq
on?. Thru C.O. / Aad This C.O. Deduct This C.O. Cbntlpenclaa
her& will be an e,rtene ton of 0 days for completion.
nm date of the captation of Contra,► Loa December 3119 82 and mar will be December 3119 82
opted by Data flamed
l E;pnt tpr �
.c(Yswrnded by Data fidhed
Lnp mer
,•o.ee es Date Sinned
ltwn.r ..
1
Dom CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
cawtfw w+.laea
IAM eegdtaem
W4?'bCMEL opiROM! ASSOC1114C.bry,.0. gh 0e uoof COpauttawTa, wc waC
eat, W 7 gap,nw avI "snl m eiwr4age. ew W,7e,a a.eMc Tama SOW
Contractor Paul A. Laurence Co. Change Order No. 67
Address P.O. Box 1267 10000 HLOWav 55 West field sdcdif. Ib. 116
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Prolect W-068-2748.0
Job locM,on Monticello. Minnesota EPA Grant tfo.C270855-03
In accordance with the fares of your contract •Mad November 20 ,4 80 with
the City of Monticello owner for WWTP Unaradina and Appurtenant Work
tow are Mr oby requested to camp Iy el th the fol Jowl ng changes from the contract plans and spec l f lcat lona:
Descr lot Ion and Just if leaf Ion: - Refer to tlald Woolf #__I" (A"604d)
The existing light ino fixtures in the Control Rui ldi nes arp in *nnr nnnrlit inn
and require reolacement in order to provide adeq+att- 1 ightinnT thr, ,=,s,
and electric rooms_
sreakdown of Coats thls Charge Order:
abor E4ulpmeet (materia)Profit S Owerhead Total Add ( total Deduct
$980.00 $625.00 1 $241.00 I s1.846_0n I
Amount of Original Contraoi f 4, 704,000.00
Satal Contract
tract Thru C.O. d 66 totel Addition Total Deduct Thru ThU C.O. /_J7
1 $4,864,027.07 1 $1,846.00 S4.865.879.07
original Contingenclas (311 1
deet Reylaing
Cont. Thru C.O. / Add This C.O. Deduct this C.O. Cat"Iglincies
mere VIII be an eutens lop of 0 days for Completion.
The dre of the completion of Contract as December llto 82 end am sill be December 31t9 82
14capted by r /14 We Sinned /
Contrec ar `�1r1 I 1 a
by i�.�^C I �- OKe ilaMd �il/D/QZ
tnoIneer
;'-o•ed by _ _- Date Signed
owner
1
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
tesoU.t warm
1)iDr5C C."s.o. Of -=a co Jk AI"M awTES. sNt.
ai,aow a 6nooa co.mauh,um sncAoll'V,
aDd+last M(wetM AYI Wnt as Ynel4wOtgl. oat»tomtisNla lams, no*
.p,rtrecior Paul A. Laurence.. Co. Change ardor Ra. 68
Address P.O. Sox 1267 10000 Highway 55 West 1`1016 111011111. Ro. 118
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Project No. 068-2748.01
Job Location Monticello, Minnesota Ph Grant fso.C270855-03
in accordance with the terms of your contract dated November 20 19 80_ with
the City of Monticello Owner for WWTP Upgrading and Appurtenant Work
lou ere hereby reQuested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications:
Oescrlptlon and Justilicaflon: - Refer to field Modlf 01 a (A"Sched)
The watermain service was extended and a hydrant was added at the southeast
corner of the site in order to provide emer4ency water supply for fire
rnntrol at the south end of the plant..
t eedown of Costs this Change Order:
:mJor [QuipeeM (materia Inotlt 4 Overhead Total Add ( Total Deduct
$1,870.00 I $1,480.00 $503.00 $3,853.00 I
.own of Or f0insi Contract, s 4, 704,000.00 IIIA
Tdeat Contract
'ontreet Thru C.o. / 67 Total Addition Total Deduct Thr u Thls C.O. / 69
S 4 , 8 6 5, 8 7: 1 $3,853.00 $4,869,726.07
1,101.61 Contlrgenclos 1661 s
W Remaining
ont. Thru C.O. I Add This C.O. Deduct This C.O. C4MIngencles
here :111 be an stlons ion of 0 days for completion.
.• ear• of the completion of Contract as December 31114 82asd sow will Da December 3114 82
Cdied by we signed
COnr KtOr ,�,.�1 /
Koaa'dso by � �`" 7 We Signed
I der
xo.ed by Date slaved
o �
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
:aesuhfas nshutm
lata awa.nw
OMi'6CHEUP1,14AYERON ♦ ASSOCIATES. CNC.
a, m,0. o, "Ism tcwa.ny3.3ne nrC,
M W. ,r1 N,.I n..VI MO.
7Y Y,nna.rQ~e. Y. 0w**,& 33,48eo fere.. baba I
Contractor Paul A. Laurence CO. Change Order No. 69
adorns P.O. Box 1267 10000 Hichwav 55 West Fiala dwell. Ib. 105, Add. b Rev.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 ftolaet tai. 068-2748.01
Job Locatlon Monticello, Minnesota M,rant No.C270855-03
in accordance with the term of pour contract dated November 20 i9 80 with
the City of Monticello Owner to, WWTP Uoqradinq and Appurtenant Work
you are hereby rep was ted to Comply with the to fowl rig changes from the contract pions and spec It l eat Ions:
Ooecrlptlon and Justification' .. Rotor to Field 1a3d11 /105 fllttedhed)
Grating is required at the Primary Clarifier and the Wet Well, and ladder
modifications are required at the Drywell for safety and access reasons.
Ereandown of Costs thla Change Order:
'Lobo, Edulpoment (material Prof It i Nerhoed
$1,200.00 $2,980.00 $627.00
,mount of Original Contraef: f 4, 704 , 000. 00
;cntracl Thru C.O. d 68 Tota, Md,tfon Total Deduct
$4,869,726.07 $4,807.00
J
Total AdeI Total Deduct I
$4,807.00
Total Contract I
Thr„ Tnls c.0. a 69
$4,874,533.07
!rlglnal Contingencies (31)
No Oki" inisig
'ont, Thru C.O. / f Ade Thla C.O. Deduef This C.O. caoflagencles
Indere a I I I dee on amens Ion lof 0 days for completion.
nom dna of the coastal to. of Contract .ea December 311111111 82'a.d now Vitt a December 31, 82
ccepted by We slowed
Conrr Ior
.;:.,mend., by �6WIV WR. iipned l�J��G/+
[nglneer
:P, 0"d by nae tra•.a
e f
Dom CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
eews,nftes tsoe:faa
wow aaahrtas
0101•61CHor1AIDa AS60CIATS, arc.
rp000 00 nIo" COra+wn
hwc
�, tyt MxMtr.. art e,+m tts+rnhMauq•e. r aYhsrl,b n,awo T,wp sate
:protractor Paul A. Laurence Cn- p,a„p.Order tow. 70
Addroos P.O. Box 1267 10000 Niahhrav 55 West Flat.Mgdit. ib. Add to 468
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 ROJW 0110.068-2748.01
Job tocetion Monticello. Minnesota EPA eraot w.C270855-03
In secordahea with the tares of Tow eantraet doted November 20 ig 86 elM
the City of Monticello owner for WWTP Upqradinq and Appurtenant Work
You are hereby requested to Camp Ir aIth the to IowIng Changes Fra the contreet plans and spas It lent Ions:
Descrlptlon and Justification: - Refer to Field Mostly / 68 (Attached)
workload and equipment delivery prevented the City staff from installinq
the Intermediate Clarifier Mechanism supplied by Chanqe Order 434. The
City therefore requests that the equipment be installed by the Contractor.
t '^sakdom of Cocoa this Ouhga Order,
labor4ulomwimateriiii prof if l omrhaad Total Add Tdal Deduct
$8,215.00 1 $3,006.00 1 $1,684.00 $12,905.00
Aewst of 0,191481 Co„tracyi ! 4,704,000.00
Total CmRrat
Contract Thr. C.O. /69 Total Addlflon Total Deduct Thru This C.O. 1 70
$4,875,533.07 $12,905.00 $4,888,438.07
>riginai Contingancias (til !
Mot Roolol,g
.one. Thru C.O. I ! Add This C.O. Dwduet This C.O. Cattlhpahelas
i
.here will be en Hanlon of 0
days for emhpla►ion,
,he dna of the ,:oeplat Ion of contract as December 31q 82 and nor will M December 21 )g 82
,copied by two fldned
acoe,ended by e?r �r ..t.�• p/ta iIOM.
Eng I'n'?di
ctre•ee aT /�„�J,/j Darr flasae
Owner
T
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
awantne aaeeaVe
tAU faawltemrt OWN- SCNELLN•MAVEAON a ASSOCIATES. INC.
pY1HOr ao ataoe OpMe.nTYna oma
sett WT,4mg9 hWewnle am auMt.-Me. wa w,fa,A 30,4W To.. Base
Contractor Paul A. IA%zrence Cn. O,ape Order Ib. '71
Adorns P.O. Box 1267 10000 Hiahwav 55 Nest Fluid radii, tb. N/A
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 P"Jer► lb. 068-2748.0
Job Location Monticello, Minnesota EPN hart lb.C270B55-03
1
In accordance with the teras of }our contract dated November 20 I9, J�_ with
the City of Monticello owner tar WW rP Uvaradina and Appurtenant Work
You ars hereby requested to coup IV aith the Wloat as d+angn troy the contract piens and spec if last tons:
Oascriptton and Justif)catloot - Shofar to field Vastly of/A tAtfaahed)
BalanCino Chance Order reflecting the difference between the estimated bid
quantities and the final installed quantities for Part VII - Roadways, Parkin
Lots and Storm Drains.
ttroakdow, of Creta this Change Order:
;i.abor Equipment Prot It a Overhead Total Add Total thoduct
$15,628.00
Awiunt of Original Contrwft f 4,704,000.00
Totallbniracf
:ontroct Thry C.O. f 70 Total Addition Total Cachet Thru zoo
! B
$4,888,438.07 1$15,628.00 1$4,904,066.07
7rlgtnal Conflegenclos tap S
Jeff p=slnip
.;cm. Thru C.O. t Add This C.O. Deduct This C.O. Caatln acro
1
rhere ally M an wahslo, of 0 dove for cagie lds.
rhe data of the coeplat ion of Contract na December 31,111 82,.d as will be december 3+114 1
2
tcopted by Oete Stoned
tbnfr er ,,/�
ecsamonded by "�', We Sinned 1111-7% d e
.2.
Engineer -�f
pproved by - pets !lased
Owwar
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
8. Consideration of Job Descriptions for laborer/Mechanic and waste-
water Treatment Plant Assistant Superintendent and Calling for
Applicants.
With the operation of the new Treatment Plant commencing, it has
become fairly obvious that at least one new person be added. Jim
Miller, John Simola and I discussed at length the type of position
which would be most effective out at the plant. As you recall,
during our preliminary budget discussion, I pointed out that we
had allocated funds for two new people to be put on staff some-
time in 1983 for the Treatment Plant. The revised budget does,
however, eliminate one of those positions, since through our
discussion, the three of us determined that we could perhaps
operate without both positions being filled. The new position
involved would be the Laborer/Mechanic position. This position
is intended to carry the majority of the load for all of the
trouble shooting, maintenance and repair, over haul, thus, free-
ing the operators for the ongoing plant operation and lab re-
quirements. At one point, John Simola thought that it might be
beneficial for the City to investigate a maintenance contract,
whereby we pay a flat contract fee for a full time person to be
on site at the plant. While in some cases this may be desirable,
it occurred to Jim and I that by putting our own person on staff, we
could more fully utilize him inarpas thnt wrnilAn't nec�svarlly
be mechanic, but which would be restricted if we were confined to
a contract. We may even find that if the operation runs smoothly
that this mechanic's time can be occasionally devoted to the re-
mainder of the fleet, not exclusively to the plant. As you will
note in the job description, the position is not designed to
handle major work of a highly technical nature. I suspect we can
rtill fully anticipate occasional major problems that we will have
to call in outside assistance. As I visualize the position at
present, I see the new person being responsible for maintenance
and mechanic work anywhere from 60% to 80% of the time, with the
remainder of his time being dedicated to other plant operation's
assistance, or if possible, fleet work in other parts of the City.
This will be a position that will enter into the bargaining unit,
and as such the starting wage is already stipulated at 80% of
present union scale.
The Assistant Superintendent's position, John, Jim and I agreed
would be a promotion from within, with the most likely person
being Albert Moyer. The reason wo fool that an assistant super-
intendent is essential is because plant operations have moved to
split shift format. By having an assistant superintendent, we
would have a responsible supervisory person on site during both
shifts. It should be noted that no a promotion from within a
- 7 -
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
position, other people within the City may apply and as such, we
perhaps should not make Albert's promotion a foregone conclusion,
although I think at this time, he would be the most logical choice,
having had the most extensive experience with the plant itself.
It should also be noted that in the formulation of the final job
description, Albert was, in fact, consulted so that he was able to
add his comments into the formulation of the policy. Anticipating
the creation of this position and the filling of it for the 1983
budget, I projected a salary equal to that of the lab analyst.
This matter has not been discussed with Albert or any employee
for that matter with the exception of John and Jim. I see that as
being equitable in that the assistant has a greater supervisory
role but the lab analyst has a greater education requirement and
to me they balance out and become effectively equal in terms of
compensation. Jim Miller has informed me that there has been
passing comments or perhaps even some informal discussion concern-
ing how the lab analyst and the assistant superintendent are going
to be handled with respect to overtime and holidays and such.
I have no difficulty with the policy we have, but I am not fully
convinced that the people going into the position are willing to
readily accept the policy after having been guaranteed certain
rights under the bargaining contract which I suspect they still
consider to be rightfully theirs even though they will be out of
the bargaining unit. I plan to talk to both of them in the near
future. As when we advertised from within for the lab analyst,
there is always the possibility that no one would be interested
in the position internally. I do think, however, that it would
be best to begin at this level and then if either no applicants
submit or the applicants are less than desirable, then we go
external. The is borer/Mechanic, however, should be advertised
at large immodiatoly.
RF.COMMF.NDF_D ACTION: pass a motion formally adopting the job
descriptions. Adopt a second motion authorizing the advertise-
mont at largo for a laborar/mechanic and advertising for a pro-
motion from within for the assistant plant superintendent. I
recommend a closing date for applications as of Thursday, Doc-
embor 9th, 1982. This date should allow us to screen the appli-
canto and send a final selection to you by the December 13th
Council Meeting. Ono final note: I neglected to mention in
the above text that the lab analyst's agreed upon salary is
$19,800 annuallyi this would be the proposed salary for the
assistant superintendent.
REFERENCES: Copies of the job descriptions for each position.
Job Description
Assistant Superintendent - Wastewater Treatment Plant
City of Monticello, Minnesota
DEFINITION:
This is a technical, skilled position involving the operation and maintenance
of the City of Monticello's Wastewater Treatment Plant facility. The position
will involve skills relating to wastewater treatment plant operations, pump
and equipment maintenance, repairs, and laboratory analysis.
RESPONSIBILITIES:
The assistant superintendent shall be directly responsible to the Wastewater
Treatment Plant Superintendent, and shall oversee the actual controls of
plant operations monitoring. The assistant superintendent shall report to
the superintendent any operational, maintenance, or sampling discrepancies,
plant problems, or any variation in standard plant operations. The ausis
tent superintendent shall collect, or be responsible for the collection of,
daily log data, maintenance records, and shall assist in training sessions
as required. He/she shall take instrument readings, conduct routine main-
tenanco, make regular maintenance rounds of the plant, perform custodial
tasxs, and other duties required Cul the u£ficiunL vpuraLlon u£ ti,e Wantu-
water Treatment Plant. The assistant superintendent shall be responsible
for additional duties as may be assigned from time, to time by the Waste-
water Superintendent, Public Works Director, City Administrator or City
Council as they sea fit. The assistant superintendent may be rcgired to
work varying and flexible schedules. Walking, bending, lifting, climbing,
and come exposure to hazardous areas are considered to be bonafido oc-
cupational requirements for the efficient performance of the duties of
assistant superintendent. Safety regulations shall be observed at all
times.
BACKGROUND/EDUCATION:
The position requires a thorough knowledge of wastewator treatment,
mechanical and basic electrical functions, elementary chemistry and
biology, and record keeping. The assistant superintendent must have
the ability to follow general directives established by the Wastowater
Superintendent, and to function and coordinate wastewater treatment
plant activities without direct supervision. It in desirable that the
nuaietant suporintendont have the ability to both ouperviae and to
work closely with his/her subordinates throuqhout the execution of all
duties relating to plant operations.
Job Description
Assitant Superintendent - Wastewater Treatment Plant
City of Monticello, Minnesota ,
Page 92
Education - High School Graduate (or G.Z.D) with a minimum of 5 years
experience in a Class A, B, or C wastewater Treatment facility: Assis-
tant Superintendent should have or be able to receive in less than six
months a C license. Assistant Superintendent should have at least two
years supervisory experience. No more than two years in a related field
may be substituted for the above requirements.
0
C
LABORER/MECRANIC
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
CITY OF MONTICELLO
JOB DESCRIPTION
This .is a skilled position with the Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant. The
Laborer/Mechanic is responsible for preventive maintenance, trouble shooting,
repair, remodeling and replacement of the physical plant along with various
mechanical units, electrical units and their controls, and certain vehicles.
The work is performed under the general supervision of the Wastewater Treat-
ment Plant superintendent.
DUTIES
This position involves the actual performance of various maintenance tasks on
pumps, motors, drive units, plumbing and heating facilities, structural and
electrical telemetry, and switch gears. The Laborer/Mechanic shall perform
required maintenance such as lubrication, oil and filter changes on various
drive engines, compressors, pumps, generators and vehicles. He shall dis-
assemble, clean and repair or replace pump seals, hydraulic drive unit
ct,Cls, ripin'J, �a!a Y,,+iv, diaphragms, vahveq. shafts, bearings, chAinB. AtC.
The mechanic shall also clean pipe lines, tanks, do minor plumbing and re-
modeling, and be a proficient arch/gas welder. The Laborer/Machanic shall
inspect and service the boiler and heating system, including controls, re-
pair and calibrate motors and gauges when not major in scope. The Laborer/
Mechanic shall install and start up now equipment, and shall trouble shoot
the control systems (including tolemetric), methane gas and diesel engines,
and shall service those units. The Laborer/Mechanic shall be responsible for
the sludge vehicle shop, and maintenance of tools and equipment as wall as the
vehicles. The Laborer/Mechanic shall be responsible for maintenance of the
opera parts inventory, and shall prepares reports and/or recommendations for the
Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent relative to said equipment and parts
inventory. The ha borer/Mocha nic shall perform other duties no may from time
to time be required by the Public works Director, the Wastewater Treatment
Plant Superintendent and the City Administrator.
DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONSI
Education - High School graduate or GED equivalent with two years of Vo -Tech
in a related field, or two years apprenticeship in a related field ouch as
plumbing, electrical of mechanical.
Laborer/Mechanic - Job Description
MWfP
November 8, 1982
Page 02
Experience/Background: The Laborer/Mechanic should have a strong background
in one or more of the following: Plumbing, pump maintenance and repair,
electrical - electronics, welding, motor repair; some background connected
with wastewater operations/maintenance or closely related area is desirable.
In addition to the above, the Laborer/Mechanic should have one to two years
direct experience in pump and control repair, trouble shooting, plumbing and
or pipe fitting, electrical or mechanical system in a similar facility.
PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS: The Laborer/Mechanic will be conducting tasks that
will require bending, lifting, climbing and some exposure to hazardous con-
ditions. Sound, safety practices shall be a requirement for this position,
along with an ability to perform in emergency situations.
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
9. Consideration of a Request by the HRA to Hold a Public Hearinq for
Tax Increment Financinq on December 13th, 1982 at 7:30 P.M.
The newly reorganized Monticello Housing S Redevelopment Authority
(HRA) met on Monday evening, November 15th, 1982. They were address-
ed by Walt Hartman and Gary winter of the Holmes 6 Graven staff and
briefed at length on tax increment financing. They also received
a briefing on the proposed IXI project and how that has developed
to this point. They took definite action relating to their plans
to proceed. They have scheduled their own public hearing for
November 29th concerning the sale of public lands. They have two
requests that they are making of the City Council. Their first
request is that the City Council call for and hold a public hear-
ing on the redevelopment plan which has been prepared and will be
adopted by the HRA prior to December 13th, 1982. This public hear-
ing comes after formal adoption by the HRA and review and approval
by the Planning Commission. The HRA has scheduled a meeting for
Tuesday, November 23rd and have invited the Planning Commission
to attend in order to expedite approval by both of those bodies.
Concurrently with this, the HRA will attempt to complete the tax
increment financing plan for the I%I proposal so that the public
hearing for the specific plan can be held at the same time as the
hearing for the general redevelopment plan. These are all part of
the statutory requirements that both the HRA and the City Must go
through to formally adopt the plan. At the conclusion of the hear-
ing on December 13th, the Council will be requested to adopt both
of the plans as well. From that date, the tax increment plan will
then be certified with the County Auditor and put into effect at
that time. This particular agenda item is closely related to the
one which follows, but the only action required for thio particular
item is the actual setting of a time for a public hearing.
REFERENCES: All references for items 9 and 10 arc listed under
item 010.
- 9 -
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
10. Consideration of Making a Loan to the HBA for the Purpose of their
Acquirinq all of Lot 7 - Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park.
This particular item pertains to the first specific proposal of
tax increment financing. As you are aware, we have gone through
extensive negotiations with IXI Assemblies for them to buy a por-
tion of Lot 7 - Block 3 and construct a building prior to the end
of 1982. The basic formula (and this is in its simplest form) is
that the HBA will buy all of Lot 7 and request that the City Council
forgive or abate future assessments on that lot. The pur,:hase price
of the 5.4 acre parcel is $58,600. The process that follows is
something like this:
1. The HRA receives a loan from the City Council for $58,600.
This is in lieu of the HRA trying to sell bonds for such
a small amount of money.
2. Before November 29th, the HRA will purchase all of Lot 7
in Block 3.
3. On November 29th, the HRA will hold a public hearing re-
lating to the sale of public lands.
4. On November 30th or shortly thereafter, the HRA will sell
to IXI Assemblies one half of Lot 7 (2.7 acres) at a sub-
stantially reduced price.
S. Before December Slot, 1982, IXI shall build, complete and
begin operating an industrial building. The tax revenues
over the next 8 years will pay lack the $58,600
in purchase price, $3,000 to Holmes 6 Graven for consult-
ing feos and $14,900 in forgiven assessments, plus create
a small surplus for the HRA to use in future projects. At
the end of the 8 year period, all tax revenues will then
be divided among the tax and jurisdictions.
1 should note that throo lots are proposed for IXI's devolopment
and that the written down land costo is the incentive they need to
build out here. IXI fully intends to construct a second building
on this half of Lot 7 boforc July 1, 1983, and anticipates purchas-
ing the second half of Lot 3 probably before the and of 1983 and
commencing with additional construction. Again, lot me reemphasize
that tax i.ncremont tinancing is terribly complex, especially if you
have not walked through the entire process on a stop hry stop basis
and observed all of the calculations and manipulating that goes on.
Based on advice by Iholmos 6 Groven,whom I have worked closely with
and who were, as I noted, in attendance at the IfRA meeting, we are
proceeding completely within the law and have determined the tax
increment budget to be completely workable so that over this period
of time, the City will actually create a surplus and not be losing
money at all.
- 10 -
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
Because of IXI's urgency to construct building #1 prior to the end
of the year, the entire tax increment process is a little more
chaotic than it ordinarily would or should be. The HRA members
are fully aware of this, and even with their appointments coming
as late as they did, are willing to work under the time constraints
for at least this project. When this first transaction is completed,
then the entire process should even itself out so that it can be
worked with in a more orderly fashion.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Call for and set the requested public hearing
for December 13th, 1982. Move and adopt a request for a loan of
$58,600 to the Monticello HRA for the purpose of buying industrial
land from the Oakwood Corporation.
REFERENCES: A copy of the minutes of the first meeting of the
HRA. A copy of the proposed financial statement for the IXI Tax
Increment District.
C
MINUTES
HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETI14G
November 15, 1982 - 7:00 P.M.
Monticello City Hall
The regular meeting of the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA) was duly held at 7:00 P.M. on November 15, 1982
at the City Hall. Members present were Phil White, Jack Reeve,
Lowell Schrupp, Vic Vokaty and Don Cochran. Members absent: none.
Also present were City Administrator, Eidem, and Finance Director,
Wolfsteller.
1. Because when the appointments were made by the Mayor and rati-
fied by the Council, it was the Mayor's determination that
the setting of terms be left to the individual members of the
HRA, the selection of terms of service on the HRA was the first
order of business. After some discussion, the following terms
were agreed upon unanimously:
Phil White
12/31/82
Jack Reeve
12/31/83
Bud Schrupp
12/31/84
Vic VnvAty
I2p1/Q5
Don Cochran
12/31/86
A motion by Reeve, seconded by Cochran and carried unanimously
designating Phil White as chairman of the HRA. Administrator
Eidem recommended that the 11RA determine a regular meeting
time, but stressed that being in the early stages of tax in-
crement financing and in the reorganization of the HRA, more
meetings might be necessary to begin. All members concurred
that for the time being, the HRA will meet as needed to ex-
pedite the development of the tax increment plan, and that a
regular mooting time will be established at a later date.
Mr. Walt Hartman and Mr. Gary Winter from Holmes 6 Graven, Inc.
were present to discuss tax increment financing. Mr. llartman
provided a detailed historical background of the tax increment
laws and expanded on some of the current uses. Administrator
Hidem explained where the City stood now in terms of their tax
increment plan development. Eidem noted that the redevelopment
plan wan nearly completed, but that it was prepared largely by
City Staff since the HRA had not mot up to this time. Eidem
explained that negotiations with IXI, Inc. had begun several
months ago and that IXI had expressed considerable interest
in tax increment financing and the benefits that they might
derive relating to land costo were the plana put into effect.
-I - 9V/0
HRA Minutes - 11/15/82
lie noted that IXI was eager to purchase some land from the HRA,
specifically the east half of lot 7, Block 3 in Oakwood Indus-
trial Park, and that the owners of the Oakwood Industrial Park
were prepared to sell at a reasonable rate all of Lot 7 in
Block 3. Eidem also pointed out that IXI was racing the clock
in an effort to put up their first building prior to the end
of 1982 for their own tax purposes. Mr. Hartman explained the
process the HRA would have to go through to buy the land from
the Oakwood owners and sell at a written down cost to IXI.
Eidem displayed the 1XI master plan for land development and
explained that the first building is designated to be up and
operating before the end of 1982 with the remainder of the
complex to be developed within three to five years. Eidem
provided a short background on IXI. Bud Schrupp added that
lie had toured their facility and that the Monticello Business
and Industry Committee had put in considerable effort to
lure IXI to Monticello.
4. A motion by Cochran, seconded by Reeve and carried unanimously
to set a public hearing for the purpose of accepting comments
on the sale of the east half of Lot 7, Block 3, Oakwood Indus-
trial Park to IXI, Inc. for 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 29,
1982 in the City Hall.
5. Eidem read to the IIRA portions of a letter from IXI to him
wherein a tentative offer of $5,000 per acre was offered.
A motion was made by Schrupp, seconded by Vokaty and carried
unanimously accepting the offer of $5,000 per acre from IX1
and authorizing entering a purchase agreement with the final
sale contingent upon the testimony and comment given at the
public hearing scheduled for November 29th.
Motion by Cochran, seconded by Reeve and carried unanimously
requesting the City Council to hold a public hearing on the
[IRA Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan on December 13, 1982
at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers. Motion by Cochran,
seconded by Schrupp and carried requesting a loan of $58,600
from the City Council for the purpose of the IiRA acquiring
Lot 7 - Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park. Mr. Cochran sug-
gooted that in order to expodito the adoption of both the
redevelopment plan and the Lax increment financing plan that
the Planning Commission be invited to a meeting at 8:00 P.M.
on Tuosday, November 23rd, 1982. lie suggested that the HRA
convene at 7:00 P.M. that night to review the final redevelop-
ment plan and then prepare to present it to the Planning Com-
mission when they arrive at 8:00 P.M. All members concurred
and the date for the next meeting was not as November 23rd
at 7:00 Y.M.
Chairman White adjourned the meeting.
Thomas A. Eidem J �l
TAX INCREMENT - FINANCIAL STATEMENT
l Lot 7
58,600
M
East 1/2 of Lot 7
29,300
14,091.67
7,450.83
Subtotal 36,750.83
Inturust 034 ap-
proximately) 14,400.00
51,150.83
legal, Admin.,
Consulting 3,000.00
Total HRA Liability 54,150.83
Cash for Land Salo
(Cast 1/2 of Lot 7)
Tax Increment generated by develop-
ment over life of district (8 Years)
NET CAIN TO HRA
West 1/2 of Lot 7
29,300
7,450.83
S 8,000.00
63,612.49
$71,612.49
54,150.83
•817,461.66
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
)), Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for Auto Repair Busi-
ness - Pat Townsend.
Patrick Townsend, who resides at 107 Locust street (legal des-
cription, southerly one-half of Lots 1 and 2 - Block 50) has
made an application to be allowed a temporary conditional use
permit to open a minor auto repair shop at his home.
The property is currently zoned B-4, regional business, under
which a conditional use is necessary to allow for a minor auto
repair business. A public hearing was held by the Planning
Commission on November 16th at which Mr. Townsend presented
letters from two neighboring residents who expressed no opposi-
tion to the auto repair business being established. In addition,
City Administrator, Tom Eidem, who is also a resident in the
name block, presented a letter indicating no opposition to the
repair business provided that certain conditions were met by
Mr. Townsend.
As a result of the testimony presented at the Planning Com-
mission, the Planning Commission recommended granting a temp-
orary one year conditional use permit provided the following
conditions were attached.
1. That no expansion or building permits be issued for ex-
pansion on this property with the auto repair business
being confined to existing buildings only.
2. That only two vehicles at any one time be on the premises
for repair.
3. That on site parking be provided for six vehicles, which
Mr. Townsend does have available.
4. That noise lovely be controlled.
5. That the business would not be transferable.
6. No outside storage of parts or vehicles.
7. Only family members could be employees.
Although the current ordinances allowing auto repair as a con-
ditional use has 18 items that should be mot before the condi-
tional use permit is granted, the Planning Commission felt that
although Mr. Townsend would not be providing hard surface park-
ing or did not most the minimum lot area of 22,500 square feet,
- 12 -
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
that as long as the permit would only be temporary for one year
and that their recommended conditions be attached, this condi-
tional use could be reviewed after one year to see whether or
not this business would be appropriate for the area.
Mr. Townsend indicated that the recommended conditions attached
to the conditional use permit would be no problem for him and
agreed to abide by all the conditions.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approving or denying the con-
ditional use permit on a temporary basis for one year. In addi-
tion, if the permit is granted, the motion should include all
conditions that would be attached to it.
REFERENCES: A copy of the Planning Commission minutes along with or-
dinance sections relating toauto repair businesses as a condi-
tional use.
MIt7UTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
November 16, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Jim Ridgeway, Richard Carlson and Ed Schaffer.
Members Absent: Joyce Dowling and John Bondhus.
1. A motion was mads by Schaffer, seconded by Carlson and unani-
mously carried to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
held on October 18, 1982 as presented.
2. Public Hearinq - Pat Townsend - Conditional Use Permit.
Mr. Pat Townsend, who resides at 107 Locust Street, requested
a conditional use permit to open a minor auto repair shop at
this address. The legal description of his property is the
southerly 1/2 of Lots 1 and 2 -•Block 50, which is currently
zoned B -d, regional business. within this zoning district,
a minor auto repair shop is allowed as a conditional use
according to our ordinances.
Mr. Townsend explained that he currently does minor auto re-
pair work primarily workinq with transmissions. Mr. Townsend
presented letters from Mr. Dave Brouillard and Gary and Dc-
lorca Block who indicated no objections to the minor repair
shop being operated at this location. In addition, Mr. Tom
Eidem, also a resident of the area, presented a letter in-
dicating no objections to the conditional use permit pro-
vided that the business be confined to existing structures
with no expansion until the area changes from its present
residential nature. In addition, Mr. Eidem requested that all
related materials be stored in doors and that customers
vehicles be limited to two at one time.
Mr. Townsend indicated that he would like the conditional use
permit on a temporary basic for one or two years as his plans
are if the buainose develops, he would be looking for an al-
tornative site to operate.
hearing no direct opposition from the neighborhood residents,
a motion was made by Schaffer, seconded by Carlson and unani-
mously carried to recommend granting a temporary ono year con-
ditional use permit to Mr. Townsend for tho minor auto repair
buoineas at 107 1,oeuot Street provided that only existing
buildings are used in the business with no expansion permitted
without roviow by the Planning Commission and also with the
1
Planning Commission Minutes - 11/16/82
attached conditions.
1. only two vehicles at any one time should be on the premises
for repair.
2. That parking be provided for up to six vehicles on the pro-
perty.
3. Noise levels in regard to the business be controlled.
4. The conditional use permit is not transferable to other
individuals.
5. No outside storage of parts or vehicles related to the
business.
6. only family members may be employed in the business.
3. Special Meetinq of the Planninq Commission and the NFA Committee.
A special meeting was set for Tuesday, November 23, 1982, at
8100 P.M. for the Planning Commission to meet with the NRA
Ce"mittee frr the rurpc=c of rcviC«lag tiro prapoaeJ the iueremeuC
financing plan.
Meeting Adjourned.
Ia-,-,Q
Rick Wolfstcdlcr
Assistant Administrator
J
10-14-4 10-14-4
(C) Custom manufacturing, restricted production and repair limited
to the following: Art, needlework, jewelry from precious
metals, watches, dentures, optical lenses provided that:
1. Such use is accessory as defined in Section 10-2-2 of
this Ordinance to the principal use of the property.
2. Does not conflict with the character of development
intended for this district.
3. The provisions of Section 10-22-1(E) of this Ordinance
are considered satisfactorily met.
( Motor Fuel Station, auto repair -minor and tire and battery
stores and service provided that:
1. Regardless of whether the dispensing, sale or offering for
sale of motor fuels and/or oil is incidental to the conduct
of the use or business, the standards and requirements im-
posed by this Ordinance for motor fuel stations shall apply.
These standards and requirements are, however, in addition
to other requirements which are imposed for other uses of
the property.
2. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the
building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing
huildingq nr area as to oaoee inpa ^.cnt in proy.4:ty vi-1—
or
i-1—or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable
distance of the lot.
1. The entire site other than that taken up by a building,
structure or plantings shell be surfaced with a material to
control dust and drainage which is subject to the approval
of the City Engineer.
4. A minimum lot area of twenty-two thousand five hundred
(22,500) square foot and minimum lot dimensions of one hund-
red fifty (150) foot by one hundred thirty (110) fact.
S. A drainage cyatem subject to the approval of the City
Engineer ahall be installed.
G. A curb not leas than six (6) inches above grade shall
separate the public sidewalk from motor vehicle service areas.
7. The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to
have no direct source of light visible from adjacent land in
residential use or from the public right-of-way and shall bo
in compliance with Section 10-1-2()1) of this Ordinance.
1�
_..,-...��.. _ ...•.�..-�—•irw..atma�r��•�,arscrcaa.-••,•'sO�•�
10-14-4
10-14-4
S. Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands
shall be installed.
9. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of
not less than five (5) feet shall be landscaped and screened
in compliance with Section 10-3-2(G) of this Ordinance.
10. Each light standard landscaped.
11. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened
from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with
Section 10-3-2(G) of this Ordinance.
12. Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict
with through traffic movement, shall comply with Section 10-3-5
of thin Ordinance and shall be subject to the approval of the
City Engineer.
13. All signing and informational or visual communication
devices shall be minimized and shall be in compliance with
Section 10-3-9 of this Ordinance,
14. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise.
15. No outside storage except as allowed in compliance with
Section 10-13-4 of .his Grdlnonce.
16. Sale of products other than those specifically mentioned
in Section 10-13-4 be subject to a conditional use permit
and be in compliance with Section 10-13-4(F) of this Ordinance.
17. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject
to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation
to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public
betterment can be nerved an well or better by modifying the
conditions.
10. The provisions of Section 10-22-1(E) of this Ordinance
are considered and satisfactorily met.
(E) Machinery Sales. (5-10-76 413).
(F) Commercial planned unit development as regulated by Chapter 20
of this Ordinance. (5-0-70 450)
Council Agenda - 11/22/82
12. Consideration of a Proposal to Enter a Cable T.V. Project Develop-
ment with other Cities.
On Tuesday, the 16th, I met with representatives from the City of
Elk River, Big take, Buffalo, Maple Lake, and Annandale to discuss
the possibility of all our cities entering a joint powers agree-
ment for the purpose of establishing a cable service territory.
Prior to my arrival, Gary had met at length with Big Lake and Elk
River and had completed most of the preparatory work. Recently,
Steve Peaslee of Annandale called and they are very interested in
cable and he also stated that Buffalo was becoming more active in
it. As a result, we called a luncheon meeting with representatives
from all the cities to discuss this and we agreed at that time our
first step is to take this proposal to our Council for an endorse-
ment to work at length forming a cable t.v. consortium for the
purpose of establishing a single franchise that would serve all
the communities. The main result of our discussion is that four
cities, namely, Big Lake, Elk River, Buffalo and Monticello would
serve as the core development force and put together the entire
joint powers package. When that work is complete, we would then
invite cities like Annandale, Maple Lake, possibly Rockford, Delano,
Albertville, St. Michael to join the consortium so that we might
induce a better bid packago when the time comes to award the franchise.
Where we stand right now is each city needs the authorization from
their governing body to proceed in a positive way towards the form-
ulation of a joint powers agreement that would allow the creation
of a cable franchise system serving all cities. in addition, the
other cities noted that they will be requesting a certain budget
amount to go into the preliminary work. Elk River has already
put into their 1983 budget the sum of $5,000. 1 believe that
Elk River's budget amount also includes the ability to pay for
legal and administrative expense when tho joint powers and cable
service territory is formed. I would recommend that we not sot
a dollar amount for these early stages of negotiations but that
if everyone agrees to the development of a cable consortium, we
will then allocate the funds to put in accordingly for our share
of the project. All that is really needed at this mooting is a
motion declaring interest in entering a joint cable authority
and authorizing my participation in the joint powers develop-
ment process.
- 14 -
GENERAL FUND - NOVEMBER - 1982
AMOUNT
CHECK N
Commissioner of Revenue - Water excise tax
153.26
16491
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - Sept.
1,797.00
16492
Foster Franzen Agency - Workmn. Comp. b Lindberg house ins.
11,048.00
16493
State Treasurer - PERA
815.48
16494
W. H. Cates Co. - Final payment of library contract
688.55
lb495
W. H. Cates Co. 6 Kjellberg Carpet - Final payment
300.00
16496
W. It. Cates Co. 6 Davis Construction -
580.00
16497
W. H. Cates Co. 6 Mpls. Glass Co.- " "
902.00
16498
W. 11. Cates Co. 6 Neilson Co. - "
2,408.00
16499
W. H. Cates Co. 6 Pella Window Co. -
1,072.00
16500
W. H. Cates Co. 6 Willmar Sash 6 Door Co. - Final payment
272.00
16501
W. H. Cates Co. 6 Monticello Electric -
1,696.20
16502
W. 11. Cates 6 Bowman Sheet Metal Co. - "
2,640.00
16503
W. H. Cates 6 Northern Plumbing -
1,350.00
16504
W. H. Cates 6 Jim Stumpf Accoustics - "
887.20
16505
W. H. Cates Co. 6 Leaders 6 Steinbecker
b71.00
16506
W. H. Ca cc$ Co. - Library payment
783.35
16507
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial services at library
115.00
16508
Corrow Sanitation - Sanitation contract - October
3,672.00
16509
U. S. Postmaster - Postage
140.00
16510
Monticello Dep. Reg. $2 - Title 6 reg. 1981 Int. sludge truck
11.00
16511
M.P.S.A. - Reg, fee for Roger Mack for conference
30.00
16512
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
150.04
16513
Murfin Landscaping 6 Design - Final ground preparation at Lib.
660.15
16514
State Treasurer - PERA W/H
1,630.54
16515
Corrow Sanitation - Additional charge for 23 more pickups
89.50
16516
Mr. Arve Crimsmo - Mayor solar;
125.00
Ib517
Mr. Dan Blonigen - Council salary
100.00
16518
Mrs. Fran Fair - Council salary
100.00
16519
Mr. Ken Maus - Council salary
100.00
16520
Dr. Phil White - Council salary
100.00
16521
James Preusse - Cleaning City ball
220.00
16522
YMCA of Mpls. - Monthly contract payment
258.33
16523
Wright County State Bank - FWT - October
3,234.70
16524
VWR Scientific, Inc. - Lab. equip. - WWTP
1,128.32
16525
Election judges salaries
949.52
16526-47
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
93.00
16548
Independent Lumber - Misc. supplies
156.23
16549
St. Treasurer - Social Security Cant. Fund - Monthly FICA
3,749.97
16550
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - October
1,814.00
16551
Monticello Fire Dept. - Payroll
1,045.00
16552
Gerald Hermes - Janitorial services at library
115.00
16553
Tom Eidem - Misc. mileage
68.00
16554
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
179.04
16555
Gwen Bateman - Animal Imp. expense
520.63
16556
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
41.50
16557
Uytrun Alloys - Supplies for St: Dept. - Welding rods,
93.76
16558
Road Machinery 6 Supplies - Clutch b bearings for grader
331.85
16559
Feed Rite Controls - Testing, Feed Rite 45, hydro fluosilic acid
1.320.97
16560
Olson Electric - Wiring at new pole bldg., repairs to lights
500.09
16561
Holmes 6 Craven - Tax increment financ. consulting fees
922.50
16562
Fidelity Bank 6 Trust - '74 parking facility bonds - interest
2,747.05
16563
Centra Soto - Twine
3.50
16564
1. M. E. - Parts for sludge vehicles
116.07
16565
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
Victor Stanley, Inc. - 4 picnic table frames
860.16
Could Bro. Chev. - Battery for fire truck
243.40
Trueman -Welters - Loader repairs -
11412.00
Curtis Industries - Drill set - St. Dept.
34.50
Wright County Auditor - k police fines - Oct.
1,375.70
Maus Tire Service - 2 tire repairs
23.59
MacQueen Equipment - Sweeper parts
180.82
Century Laboratories - Ice melt pellets
116.00
McEnary, Krafft, Birch 6 Kilgore - Balance on library contract
924.00
Thill Track 8 Tractor - Flywheel for grader
150.00
Coast to Coast - Supplies for all Depts.
85.89
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
1,060.40
Share Corp. - Liquid fertilizer and weed control
668.19
Phillips Petro. Corp. - Cas for rodder
5.33
North Central Public Service - Utilities
307.97
Equitable Life Assurance - Ins. W/H
40.00
Monticello 0. K. Hdwe. - 2 hand trucks for library
47.98
SMA Elevator - Parts for Int'l. truck
26.70
Howard Dahlgren Assoc.- Planning ffes - Oct.
365.00
Foster Franzen Agency - Fire Dept. ins.
340.20
Treasurer, State of MN. - Water testing services
197.83
L 6 S Tool 6 Design - Grader repair - throw out bearing
45.00
Davis Electronic - 2 pager repairs for Fire Dept.
41.50
Watertower Paint 6 Repair - install new dump valve in water tower
750.00
Banker's Life Ina. - Croup ins.
2,451.99
Greys. Johnson 6 Assoc. - Computer processing for Sept.
290.00
Firer oar:: Ilp:e. - uL)IiC fund charges
4.00
Lindberg b Sons - Paint for WWTP
15.25
R 6 C Associates - Soap dispensers and soap
39,10
Gurdon Link - 1600 gal. gas
1,900.80
Moon Motors - J. D. parts
38.70
Big Lake Machine - Snow plow repairs
11.00
Rick Wolfsteller - Oct -Nov, mileage.
41.75
Morrell Transfer - Freight on grader parts
32,90
Lecf Bros. - Uniforms
130.50
Buffalo Bituminous - bituminous
23.13
Earl F. Andersen - Signs and batteries for flashers
174.57
Bareness Drug - films
18,78
Maus Foods - Misc. supplies for all Depte.
129.32
Our Own Hardware - Misc. supplies
297.89
Granite Electronics - Radio repairs - Public Works
37.25
Audio Communications - Repairs to 2 way radio
14.00
Humane Society of Wright County - 10 dogs b I cat festered
53.00
Bauer Meter - 24 water meters
1,194.24
Central McCowan - Cyl. rental
2.40
Monticello Office Products - Office. supplies
82.59
Monticello Printing - Letterheads', colored paper 6 election ball.
125.70
Amoco Oil Co. - Cas for Fire Dept.
19.84
Puwer Components - Grader repairs - resurface flywheel
48.00
Local 049 - Union dues
84.00
National Life Ins. - Tom Eidem pension plan payment
85.00
Liefert Trucking - Freight on water meters
15.00
Tom Eidem - Cable 1'. V. meeting expense
5.15
Marco Business Products - Copy machine repair and supplies
582.07
Northwestern Bell - Fire phone
36.43
The Plumbery - WWTP - tub and f ••peat
48.37
Northern States Power - Utilitf. �
6,37),4)
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK N
OSM - Mist. eng. fees for September
23,380.52
16623
Paul A. Laurence Co. - Payment 021 on WWTP
84,314.88
16624
Administrative Mgmt. - Subscription
18.00
16625
Stokes Marine - Sever plant supplies
13.10
16626
Harry's Auto Supply - St, and Park supplies and repairs '
40.35
16627
VWR Scientific - Lab equip.
220.86
16628
International City Mgmt. Assoc. - Annual sub.
160.00
16629
Money Magazine - Subscription
23.95
16630
Price Electric - Ballast for liter at Mtce. Bldg., heater parts
170.45
16631
National Bushing - St. suppliesj{
14.03
16632
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H
722.34
16633
Smith, Pringle d Hayes - Legal fees for Sept. and Oct.
1,842.00
16634
Foster Franzen Agency - Sludge vehicles add'1, premium
1,251.00
16635
Safety Kleen Corp. - Mtce. on parts washer at Mice. Bldgs
30.50
16636
Monticello Times - Misc. publishing and printing
434.68
16637
I!
Payroll for October j I� i
$19,755.38
1982 111'
,
$210,800-69
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR NOVEMBER -
I
LIQUOR RM
LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS - NOVEMBER - 1982
Coast to Coast - Supplies
10.87
VOID
0
Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax - Sept.
3,700.05
Foster Franzen Agency - Workmns. Comp. renewal
561.00
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - Sept.
237.00
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H
94.52
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. - Mark 1.
20.00
State Treasurer - PERA
194.18
Twin City Wine Co. - Liquor
1,509.43
Ed Phillipa b Sons - Liquor
4,987.41
Wright County State Bank - FWT - October
498.80
Griggs, Cooper - Liquor
2,368.32
Ed Phillips h Sons - Liquor
4,204.00
St. Treasurer - Monthly FICA - October
407.20
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - October
228.00
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
20.00
Twin City Wine - Liquor
2,134,64
Ed Phillips b Sona - Liquor
9,640.56
Jude Candy 8 Tobacco - Misc. mdse.
520.14
Seven Up Bottling - Misc. mdse.
341.30
Old Dutch Foods, Inc. - Misc. mdse.
150.74
Citv of Monticello - 3rd Orr. water and aewcr
109.74
Midland Beverage - Wine
39.80
Northern States Power - Utilities
458.62
Yonak Sanitation - Contract
82.50
Viking Coca Cola - Misc. mdae.
430.20
Liefert Trucking - Freight
524.30
A. J. Ogle Co. - Beer
863.60
Thorpe Dist. Co. - Beer
2,728.55
Uahlheimer Diet. Co. - Beer
7,545.73
Day Diet. Co. - Beer
167.30
Grosslein Beverage - Beer
12,912.65
Dick Beverage - Beer
6,298.30
Cruys, Johnson 8 Assoc. - Computer processing - Sept.
110.00
North Central Public Service - Utilities
58.34
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
49.79
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/II
114.84
Banker's life Ins. - Group ins.
276.58
Share Corp. - Fertilizer and weed control
222.72
Monticello Times - Adv.
363.30
Payroll for October 3,343.18
TOTAL LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS $68,548.20
(: D