City Council Agenda Packet 01-28-1985/ AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
l Monday, January 28, 1 985 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve A. Grimsmo
Council Members: Fran Fair, William Fair, Jack Maxwell, Dan Blonigen.
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held January 14,
1985.
3. Citizens Comments/Pet It ions, Requests, and Complaints.
New Business
d. Consideration of a Proposal from Howard Dahlqren 6 Associates
to do a Downtown Redevelopment Plan.
5. Consideration of a Farmers Home Administration Financed
Housing Proposal for Low and Moderate Income Families.
( 6. Consideration of Bingo License - Applicant, Knights of Columbus.
7. Consideration of Supporting Monticello Township in their
Opposition to a Turnback of a County Road.
8. Consideration of Developing Softball Fields.
9. Department Head Reports.
10. Consideration of Bills for the Month of January.
11. Adjournment.
I
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
L,
January 14, 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Mayor Arve Grimsmo. Fran Fair, Bill Fair,
Jack Maxwell, Dan Blonigen.
1. Call to order.
2. Oath of Office for Newly Elected Officiale.
City Administrator, Tom Eidem, issued the oath of office to
the newly elected officials, Council members William Fair and
Dan Blonigen, along with the Mayor, Arve Grimace.
3. Approval of Minutes.
Motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by Maxwell, to approve
the minutes of the regular meeting hold December 10, 1984, and
the special mooting hold December 27, 1984, as presented. voting
in favor was Blonigen, Grimace, Dill Fair, with Maxwell and
Fran Fair abstaining duo to absence at the special meeting.
5. Public Nearing - Petition for Vacation of 6th Street - Applicant,
LiConstruction 5, Inc.
In November, 1984, Construction 5, Inc., petitioned the Council
to consider vacating Gth Street lying adjacent to Block 41 in
Lower Monticello to facilitate the development of the property
for future apartment buildings. In light of the request, the
City recommended that the developer consider roplatting all
of their property in Lower Monticello to create now lots: and
the City could than consider vacating not only 6th Street adjacent
to Block 41, but also other dead and portions of undeveloped
Washington and Hennepin Streets in the same, vicinity.
A preliminary sketch plan wan presented after a coating was
hold with the developer, along with the City Planner and City
Engineer, that shows an extension of Lauring Lana that tiea
in with Copeland Road near the Malone property. The Malonae
have indicated they would be willing to Bell to the City a portion
of their property that would enable the Lauring Lane road to
extend through for future development into Maurice Hoglund -0
property and eventually connect to County Road 118.
_ Basad on the preliminary sketch, the City would be vacating
1 approximately 106,447 square foot of platted road area to
Construction 5, Inc., while Construction 5 would be dedicating
u
.02
Council Minutes - 1/14/85
Q approximately 84,000 square feet of new road area. Although _ J
the exact figures have not been yet worked out, there would
be a difference in square footage given up versus new street
area dedicated. which would be determined at a later date as
to whether any compensation would be required from the developer
for the additional land he is acquiring.
Hearing no public comments regarding the vacation of the above
streets, Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Blonigen,
and unanimously carried to give prelimina vy approval to the
concept of replotting and directiny the developer to proceed
with his preliminary plat as proposed with the final compensation
(if any) to be determined during the final. platting process.
6. Variance Request Appeal - Applicant, Security Federal Savings
6 Loan Association.
Security Federal has requested that this item be delayed to
a later data; and by consensus of the Council, this item was
tabled for the present time.
7. Opening and Review of Bids and Consideration of a Resolution
Awarding the Sale of $860,000.00 General Obligation Improvement
Bonds for Fire Hall Construction.
1 Mr. Ron Langneso of Springated. Inc., the City's Bonding Consultant, 1
was present at the Council meeting with six bide received on J
the sale of $860,000.00 G.O. Bonds. The bide received were
as follows:
Not Interest Not Interest
Syndicate [load Dollar Dost Rate
Juran Moody $638,677.50 9.0721 t
Allison Williams Co. $616,075.00 0.7510 i
tat Minneapolis $619,385.00 8.7960
Norwaot $618,487.5 0 6.7853 a
Cronin - Mdreotto 5615,470.n o 8.7424
Morrill Lynch $610,295.00 0.6609 i
It was recommended by Mr. Langneno that the low bid from Merrill
Lynch at a not interest rate of 8.6689 bo accepted.
Motion woo made by sill Fair, seconded by Blonigon, and unanimously
carried to adopt the resolution awarding the Bala of SBG0,000.00
in General Obligation Bonds to Morrill Lynch, Inc., at a not
interest rato of 0.6669. Soo Resolution 1985 41.
B. Consideration of Change Order No. 2 for Project 84-1, County
Stats Aid Highway 075.
Tho Initial contract with Buffalo Dituminouo for repaving County
-- Road 75 called for a completion data of October 15, 1984.
-2-
1._
Council Minutes -1/14/85
1 Since it was apparent that the work would not be completed by
L this date, o stop order was issued to the contractor delaying
paving of Broadway until spring of 1985.
In order to amend the contract, a Change Order was prepared
that provides for a completion date of June 15, 1985.
Motion was made by Maxwell, seconded by Bill Fair, and unanimously
carried to approve Change Order No. 2 with Buffalo Bituminous,
Inc., on the 1984-1 Improvement Project.
Consideration of a Conditional Use Request to Allow an Apartment
Building to be Built in Excess of 12 Units - Applicant, Joseph G.
Poehler b Associates.
On December 10, 1984, the City Council unanimously adopted a
motion granting preliminary approval for a proposed 24 -unit
apartment house complex which would be financed by the Farmers
Homo Administration and would be available for families with
low and moderate incomes. The proposed location discussed at
that time was property owned by Marvin George near Country Club
Manor. At the January 8, 1985, Planning Commission meeting,
the specific request for a conditional use to allow more than
12 units was presented by the developer, Joe Poehlar. Several
property owners in the Country Club Manor Addition expressed
opposition to the proposal; and as a result, the Planning Commission
recommended denial of the conditional use permit and passed
it on to the Council.
Prior to the Council mooting, the developer, Mr. Poehlor, requested
that his conditional use request be tabled until a future data
to allow the owner of the property, Marvin George, to prepare
his preliminary plat for replotting the Outlot A of Country
Club Manor. After the platting is presented to the Planning
Commiasion for review, Mr. Poohlor would than like to present
his proposal after an exact lot is determined. It woo the consensus
of the Council that thin conditional use request, along with
thn preliminary replatting, should agotn be brought before the
Planning Commission l'or additional public hearings.
A brief diocunsion wan held by the Council concerning this matter
in ragardn to conditional unu roqueals in general. It was dioeuosad
that conditional uses are normally considered permitted uses
within a zoning district, but conditions can be attached that
may lesson the impact of n dovolopmont with the surrounding
areas. Normally, it a duvalopor moots all of the conditions
that are reasonable, a conditional use permit has to be granted
if the proper zoning hes boon mat, etc.
-3-
Council Minutes - 1/14/85
0 10. Consideration of Conditional Use Request to Allow an Addition
to be Built onto a Non -Conforming Building in a B-3 zone - Applicant,
Danner Trucking.
Mr. Bob Danner of Danner Trucking applied for a conditional
use permit to build an addition to his present building along
Highway 25 South. The addition was intended to be used to provide
storage for items that were currently stored in his present
building, thus freeing up space as that he could house his tractor
trailers inside. It was noted by the Building Inspector that
Mr. Danner started construction of the leanto addition without
a building pormit or without a conditional use permit. It was
also noted that since his current business is a non -conforming
use in a B-3 zone, alterations which enlarge thin non -conforming
use are not technically allowed under our current zoning ordinance.
It was pointed out that one of the advantages of allowing this
leanto storage addition would be that Mr. Danner could possibly
clean up his property and eliminate items that are currently
stored in the open.
After further discusnion, motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded
by Blonigon, and unanimously carried to grant the conditional
use permit for the addition contingent upon Mr. Danner agree
(� to clean up his property and remove all miscellaneous items
stored outside other than trailers for his trucking business.
�1 If Mr. Danner wan not agreeable to this compromise, the item
would again be considered by the Council for possibly legal
action to atop the building addition.
11. Consideration of Making Annual Appointments.
Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Maxwoll, and unanimously
carried to adopt the following schedule of annual appointments
as follows:
Official Depositories: Wright County State Bank
1st National Bank of Monticello
Security Federal Savings 6 Loan
tat Bank of Minneapolis
official Newspaper: Monticello Times
Planning Commission: Jim Ridgeway
Ed Schaffer
Richard Carlson
Joyce Dowling
Richard Martlo
r '
l
HRR; Kan Msua Ito fill remainder of
,I Cochran's term)
I
Dud Schrupp
-4-
Council Minutes - 1/14/85
Joel Erickson L
Library Board: warren Smith
Parking Committee: Dennis Seitz
Marn Flicker
Bud Schrupp
Other Jurisdictions: Community Education - Bill Fair
Fire Board - Rick Wolfsteller
OAA Arve Grimsmo
Acting Mayor: Fran Fair
Consulting Planner: Howard Dahlgron 6 Associates
Auditor: Gruys Johnson 6 Associates
Health Officer: Dr. Maus
12. Consideration of Renewing the Contract for Servieas with OSM.
Mr. John Badalich, of the City's Consulting Engineering Firm
of OSM, submitted to the Council the proposed adjustments their
firm planato make to the annual contract for engineering services
n with the City. The only chango being proposed is in the hourly
rates for general engineering services. The schedule of changes
results in an approximate increase of 51 over 19841s schedule.
Councilman Blonigon felt that in the past too many change orders
have occurred on projects engineered by OSM and felt that this
related to the services being providad by the engineer. Mr.
Badalich, of OSM, explained that change orders are a natural
part of contracting and such items will always occur.
After further discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded
by Maxwell, to approve renewing the contract with OSM for engineering
services for the City of Monticello for 1985. Voting in favor
was Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Jack Maxwell, Arvo Grimamo. Voting
in the opposition: Dan Blonigon.
13. Conaideration of Maintenance Agreement with Wriqht County for
County State Aid Ilighwayn in Monticello.
For many years now, the City of Monticello has each year entered
Into an agreement with Wright County to maintain certain County
State Aid Ilighwayn within the City limits. The County reimburses
the City each year an amount based on Lho typos of maintenance
_ the City does and based on tho number of road milso calculated
by the County'a actual coat par mile for the previous year.
Total County 8tato Aid Highways within the City limits that
aro maintained by Monticello is 4.759 miles. The amount of
-5-
Council Minutes - 1/14/65
revenue received for this maintenance is approximately $4,000.00 -
55,000.00 annually.
Motion was made.by Maxwell, seconded by Blonigen, and unanimously
carried to approve entering into a maintenance agreement with
Wright County for County State Aid Highways for 1985 as presented.
14. Consideration of Supporting the School's Request of Wright County
for Traffic Control at the High School.
Monticello School Board recently passed a resolution requesting
that Wright County make three changes in the speed limits and
signing along County Road 75 in front of the High School. In
addition, they requested that the County install an overhead,
double blinking amber light east of the Junior High School parking
lot. The School District has requested City support in their
efforts to make these changes and requested a letter from the
City approving their request.
Motion wag made by Fran Fair, seconded by Bill Fair, and unanimously
carried to otter a letter of support for the School District'a
request to Wright County for traffic sign changes, but noting
that the City does not endorse any specific sign layout and
design but would rather leave this up to traffic professionals
for proper design.
15. Consideration of 1985 Sewer Rate Increase. J
Public Works Director, John Simola, reviewed with the Council
the proposed budget for 1965 for operating the WWTP. Mr. Simola
noted that the City will need to raise 5255,250.00 for the operation
and maintenance of the WWTP, with $234,800.00 needed from revenue
of users. To arrive at this figure, Mr. Simola recommended
a 3.2% increase in the sewer rates be adopted. This recommended
rate increase would result in the residential users' rate going
from $1.25 per hundred cubic foot to $1.29 par hundred cubic foot.
Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Maxwell, and unanimously
carried to adopt the following rate schedule for sanitary cower
usage affective January 1, 1985, as follows:
Flow $0.688/100 cu.ft. ($8 minimum billing for
tat 500 cu.ft.)
BOD $0.095/pound
TSS 50.185/pound
Combined Rate $1.29/100 cu.ft. ($8 minimum billing for
(Residential, lot 500 cu.ft.)
Com-, 6 Inat. )
i
i
L _6-
Council Minutes - 1/14/85
r--
1
16. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Execution of an Agreement
withControl Data Corporation and Other Minnesota Coalition
of Outstate Citic6 on a Joint Comparable worth Study.
As required by recently passed legislation, the City of Monticello
will have to implement and establish an equitable compensation
system for all its employees. In order for the City to comply
with the new State Statutes, the City must perform in-depth
evaluations of every position within the City and must submit
a report to the Commissioner of Employee Relations by October 1,
1985. Basically, this means that the City must establish a
numerical rating system that reflects on every task that an
employee performs under the general guideline of their job description.
Positions with similar total points by State Law should be receiving
similar compensation within the City.
The Coalition of Outotate Cities Organization, along with the
Metropolitan Area Managers Association, felt that it would be
more cost effective to engage an outside consultant to work
with the group to prepare evaluations since so many city positions
are similar from community to community. These groups have
selected as their consultant the Control Data Corporation Business
Advisors to perform the Individual job evaluations. The cost
to the City of Monticello would be a $3,000.00 base fee plus
n $25.00 per employee, resulting in approximately a $3,625.00
to the City. In light of the fact that the Comparable worth
v Legislation is highly technical and extremely delicate with
respect to avoiding potential litigation, it was recommended
that the City join in with Control Data Corporation to perform
those evaluations.
Motion wan made by Maxwell, seconded by Fran Pair, and unanimously
carried to adopt a resolution authorising execution of an agreement
with Control Data Corporation on a joint comparable worth study.
Soo Resolution 1985 02.
17. Conaiducatiun of Bills Cur the Month of December.
Motion was made by 131onigon, seconded by Maxwell, and unanimously
carried to approve tho hills for the month of December and January,
1985, as presented.
�:�•-'� LUQ
Rick Walfstol r
Assistant Adm istrator
-7-
Council Agenda - 1/20/65
4. Consideration of a Proposal from Howard Dahlgren & Associates
to do a Downtown Redevelopment Plan. (T.E.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Several months ago, Councilmember Fair and I met with representatives
of a Downtown Committee who expressed substantial concern over
the deterioration of the downtown. One of the first questions
the merchants asked was whether or not the City could do something
to make merchants take care of their property, store fronts,
etc. The main concern was that the general appearance of the
downtown was deteriorating and was not particularly inviting
to shoppers. The merchants who attended that meeting stated
that there were some merchants who put a great deal of time,
money, and effort into maintaining the appearance of their property,
only to have it detracted from by those stores who did little
or nothing. At that meeting, I indicated that there was no
true enforcement policy that the City could use to make store
owners upgrade their property unless the property developed
into a blight or a nuisance. Similarly, I indicated that the
City clearly could not legislate taste as far as building design.
What did coma out of that meeting was that there are some things
that the City can do that can beautify the downtown and can
serve as a catalyst for merchants to join the beautification.
At that time I indicated we could look at new sidewalks, now
landscape furniture and plantings, that we could look at new
parking lot dosign,and finally, we could attempt to coordinate
an effort with all retailers to beautify their own properties.
At that same meeting I also indicated that the one financial
incentive the City could conceivably utilize would be to issue
low interest loans to merchants for the beautification. I stressed
at that meeting that I would not guarantee ouch a loan program
over happening. I simply stated that such a program is legal
and if properly established, could be utilized.
Whon we did the budget last fall, we put $10,000.00 into the
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund for the express purpose of preparing
a downtown rehabilitation study. John Uban, representing Howard
Dahlgron & Associates, will be attending the Council mooting
to make a proposal for doing that study. He will discuss the
scope of what they will do and the estimated cost for the services.
I wish to atreas the difference that Uban Is making a proposal
to do a study, not a proposal to do the downtown. This Is vary
similar to when we interviewed architects, except at this time
we are interviewing only one firm for the purpose of doing the
study. I have mot with John Uban and indicated the types of
things we want the planners to look at and a potential time
frame. I proaumo those matters will be included in his proposal.
Similarly. I emphasized that early on there must be several
Mc
Council Agenda - 1/28/85
meetings with the retailers so that they will be an integral
part of the entire downtown planning. I also emphasized to
John that the major part of the study should focus on those
things that the City can do to assist in the rehabilitation
in the downtown, whether or not we have the cooperation of the
retailers. There will be a section that will be aimed directly
at the merchants and the potential they have for rehabilitating
their buildings. The main thrust, however, will be aimed at
municipal improvements as opposed to individual owner improvements.
It is my understanding that John Uban will bring along the copies
for your review. Again, this aspect and review will be very
similar to our discussions with architects.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Based on the extent and scope of the proposal, authorize
the execution of a contract with Howard Dahlgren for downtown
planning services.
2. Deny the proposal and do not authorize contract execution -
This action should occur if a finding is made that no downtown
services are needed. Thin essentially would say that if
the downtown needs rehabilitation, lot the merchants do
it.
3. Based on the extent and scope of the proposal, amend the
proposal to fit the budget - If the proposal comes in at
substantially higher than the budgeted figuro, we may wish
to pars the project down to suit our budgetary limitations.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that a combination of Alternatives 1 and 3
be used if necessary. I think it is essential that the City
do initiate a downtown redevelopment study in light of the reconstruction
of 75 and 25, the now bridge. Lhe now businesses having developed
on Oakwood and the Library block, as well as the lose of a fav
businesses in the downtown. Thorn is, likewise, a proposal
to rehabilitate the old Ford building, and negotiations aro
still underway to clear the property behind K 6 11 Auto. I think
all of those elements would be pulled together in a uniform
fashion under a master rehabilitation plan. I wish to also
note that Maus Grocery is considering a larger facility and
expand its site, and those concerns need also to be addressed.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
I will submit copies of the proposal with the agenda if they
arrive from Dahlgron in time. If not, John Uban will prooent
those at the meeting.
-2-
Council Agenda - 1/28/85
5. Consideration of a Farmers Home Administration Financed Housing
Proposal for Low and Moderate Income Families. (T.E.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As I noted in your December 10 agenda supplement, the City has
no standard policy for reacting to proposals for reduced assessment
housing in the City. Consequently, the City Council must give
their endorsement to each individual project as it is presented.
Brad Larson, Jim Metcalf, and I believe Ken Barthel of Barthel
Homes are proposing a 33 -unit low and moderate income housing
development for Lot 5 in Lauring Hillside Terrace. As noted
earlier, the assessed value on a Farmers Home Administration
project is based on 208 of the estimated market value rather
than the 288 which is used for conventional housing. Thus,
the Council must grant its acceptance of a proposal that carries
an assessed value less than other housing. Like the project
that came before you in December, your approval is necessary
for the application to be submitted to the federal government.
Also, your approval at this time is not an approval of the project,
only of the concept and of allowing a project with a reduced
assessed value.
The surveys taken by the current developers as well as the developer
who was before you in December definitely indicate a need for
Csafe, quality, affordable housing for low and moderato income
people. I have only two concerns with thin project, neither
of which need to be considered to be major issues. My first
concern in granting approval to this group that has previously
indicated they would be building elderly housing. That project,
an you are aware, hoe not become a reality an yet. My other
concern that ralates to this project exclusively concerns the
site. I simply have some concern that by concentrating all
of the low and moderato income family housing along Lauring
Lana, we are gradually creating a modern ghetto. By modern
ghetto, I simply moan a concentration of low and moderate income
people or a pocket of poverty. Ghetto need not moan crumbling
buildings and high crime rates. By concentrating all low and
moderato income housing along this area, we onsontially take
away the freedom of choice for low and moderato income people
as to whore they can live. Granted, we cannot no scatter ovary
low and moderato income housing project ouch that a family can
choose any neighborhood in the City that they wish to live,
but I think it would be an admirable goal for the City to encourage
scattered site development rather than cluntoring all low income
properties in a single neighborhood. I also wish to qualify
this concern. We do not have an over abundance of low and moderato
income and consequently have not generated a real pocket of
poverty at this time. I bring thin subject up only as a caution
that we begin watching so that such a trend does not occur.
-3-
Council Agenda - 1/28/85
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
In order to address the number of low and moderate income families
that do quality for housing of this type and who do, in fact,
deserve safe, quality, affordable housing, staff recommends
that an endorsement be granted to accept 33 unite of FmNA financed
housing suited for low and moderate income families.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Map indicating the proposed location.
-4-
,''� .P'_:U ��.�, i• +J` r.�;. .-1^M'�(.�! I C', ��+'_Intl-Y .',�(' '•�'
§1 91.�
'i/t'*j�7�,(rr��%ter . i • , �[,`(�J y��� �.,.� .i• �T`i � � .�t�J.,. t tgJ�,l�` �,
T,1 +J \ 1 �}� { 11� 7r •fit
HIGHWAY d `r• • !%J ` .+
+
NO. 84 t ,�
lit
OA
'� � ` •O _---" , �� Gym � ,...
I
Vkot,'D jk� OM -
pt
PROPOSAL NO. 1
(WITHOUT GARAGES)
iY Avb MdL.rr uu►-Ts
,obMOMOOM (Noc c7)
1 O,'�b'f"3++�iT: P't ,: Pi✓Ct �-Dac:r 3 3 'TGTA, L
Z.Ey99L '9Q.PT.'
51DE`.W¢�.1� Laea � w
i
f
Y-4
ID3
REAR ELEVATION,
Council Agenda - 1/28/85
6. Consideration of Bingo License - Applicant, Knights of Columbus. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Knights of Columbus 06825 (Monticello -Big Lake) recently
applied for an annual bingo license to operate every other Sunday
night at the Monticello VFW Club.
Recently passed state legislation has created the "Charitable
Gambling Control Board" who will be the agency responsible for
licensing all "gambling" activities effective 3/1/85. This
change effectively eliminates all City licensing after 3/1/85
for all gambling such as bingo, pull tabs, raffles, tip boards,
etc.
The only control the City will have is to decide if gambling
in general will be allowed within the City.
As a result, it is suggested that this request by the Knights
of Columbus be tabled until our next meeting where an agenda
item will be presented discussing the now regulations and options
available to the City.
-5-
Council Agenda - 1/28/85
7. Consideration of Supporting Monticello Township in their Opposition
to a Turnback of a County Road. (T.E.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
While full maintenance responsibility for repair and snow removal,
etc., has lain with the Township and City, that stretch of Orchard
Road from County Road 75 to the intersection by the Flea Market
is officially County road. It apparently was constructed at
the time of the freeway construction and was given from the
State to the County. The County, going along with the program
it initiated approximately a year ago, wishes to turn back the
section from the overpass to the intersection to the Township.
when that turnback is complete, they will turn back the remaining
section from County Road 75 to the overpass to the City. On
Tuesday morning, January 29, the County Board is holding its
hearing on this proposed turnback. Several days ago, Marge
Goetzke, representing Monticello Township, came to see me to
explain why the Township is opposed to such a turnback and to
request the City's support in their opposition to that turnback.
The Township's main concern lies with the reconstruction of
the intersection down by the Flea Market. Because the Township
already has full maintenance responsibility for the road, there
is no now coat anticipated by virtue of the turnback with respect
to maintenance. However, at the time a now intersection becomes
f absolutely essential to accommodate the traffic going to the
Flea Market, the full expense of that construction would lio
on the shoulders of the Townahip. It is the Township's contention
that by virtue of the volume of traffic, this stretch of road
should remain within the County system, and the County should
bear the responsibility to upgrade to accommodate that traffic
load. It seems reasonable to state that the volume of traffic
on that road warrants the County retaining responsibility for
that stretch.
I anticipate that a representative of the Township will be in
attendance at the City Council meeting. AD I understand it,
they primarily would like the Council to give them their support
in their opposition. I think this can legitimately be done
by a motion or perhaps even a conaonouo. In addition, the Council
may wish to direct that a letter of support be draftod so that
the Township official could carry that latter to the County
Board mooting. I will be unable to attend the County Board
mooting because I am already committed to the League of Minnesota
Cltioa Logialativo Action Conference, which begins Tuesday morning.
You may wish to consider, in lieu of a letter, appointing some
other City ropr000ntativo to attend the County Board mooting.
-8-
Council Agenda - 1/28/85
l B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Lend support to the Township's opposition.
2. withhold support from the Township's opposition.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Having discussed the matter with John Simola and other staff
members, we feel that it is appropriate to support the Township
in their opposition. Clearly, the volume of traffic on this
road does warrant County consideration. Likewise, there has
been substantial discussion about the Flea Market eventually
being annexed and being upgraded. If this is the case, then
the streets in the area will become City streets. Before any
turnback should be allowed, the upgrading by the County should
be done and should be done to a level that would be acceptable
to City standards.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the map showing the stretch of road in question.
-7-
Council Agenda - 1/28/85
7. ADDENDUM. (T. E.)
After the conclusion of the preceding part of the supplement,
I received a telephone call from the Wright County Highway Engineer's
office informing me that the County Board would be considering
the revocation of that segment of the County Road lying between
75 and the overpass. They intend to turn back this section
of road to the City at the same time they turn the other leg
of the road back to the Township. I did inform them over the
phone that as far as I knew, we would be opposing the turnback
unless the intersection was brought up to a standard that could
handle the volume of traffic. John Simola has agreed to represent
the City at the County Board meeting to discuss this matter.
Again, as mentioned in the earlier part of the supplement, the
maintenance of this stretch of road is not so much a problem
as is the reconstruction of the intersection. While this stretch
of road does not legitimately serve County purposes, it does
strike me that the County is seeking to simply wash their hands
of this matter and quick get out of any involvement before reconstruction
and substantial expenditures become necessary. I still think
that we should oppose this revocation until the reconstruction
is completed.
One final note: We cannot stop the revocation of the street,
but perhaps we can bring enough pressure on the County Board
members for them to capitulate to our wishes.
-e-
46
=I-
f
Council Agenda - 1/28/85
8. Consideration of Developing Softball Fields. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
In 1984, the City Council indicated they would be willing to
work with the Monticello Softball Association in assisting them
with developing the ballfields on the NSP property near Montissippi
Park. The softball fields are in such very poor condition that
the league has been losing teams over the past few years. It
was felt that if the fields were properly upgraded and well
maintained that the Monticello Softball Association would be
able to attract more teams to this area.
An amount of $3,500.00 was placed into the 1985 Budget in hopes
to upgrade the well and fields at the existing site.
The above costs were based upon the assumption that the existing
4 -inch wall could be developed to a point where we could simply
add a larger pump to got the required amount of water.
In late October of 1984, we hired McAlpine Rrothers, Inc., out
of Rogers. Minnesota, to test the well at an approximate cost
of $150.00. This firm tested the existing 4 -inch well and found
that the maximum capacity of this well would be 15-20 gallons
per minute. This is substantially lose than that required to
water both of the fields adequately. McAlpine Brothers, Inc.,
gave us an estimate for a now wall of $2,250.00. This does
not include the coat of their developing the wall at $90 par
hour. McAlpine Brothers' estimate for the installation of a
largo capacity pump with piping, excluding any service connection,
is $2,860.00. This gives us a total coot of $5,110.00. There
could be considerable savings with going with a smaller pump.
However, by the time we add the now wiring costo and possibly
pressure tank costo, we're going to be back up in this area
of, say, $4,500.00-55,000.00. This is more than the total developmental
cost that we have included into the 1985 Budget and does not
oven begin to address any other upgrading or routine maintenance
of the fields.
The following are a tabulation of some of the costs that we
would expect to soo with development of the NSP ballfiolde.
Upgrading wall
S 5,110.00
Piping for minimal all -
above ground sprinkler
system
S 350.00
Limo 6 Black Dirt
S 800.00
Electricity
S 70.00
Toilet Rental
S 600.00
Yearly Maintenance
5 500.00
(materials)
Yearly Maintenance (labor)
S 1,450.00
Garbage Collection
S 250.00
Total tot Year Coote
S 9,130.00
-9-
Council Agenda - 1/28/85
Some of the long-range costs in developing the ballfields could
be such items as listed below.
On-site Sewage Septic Tank System $ 3,000.00
Restrooms/Concession Stands $15,000.00+
Lighting $ 7,500.00+
As can be seen by the above estimated expenses, the cost of
developing ballfields can be expensive. There are some drawbacks
that should be considered to developing the NSP softball fields.
We have been unable to obtain any long-range commitment from
NSP. We have only their verbal commitment that they foresee
no need for the property in the immediate future. This could
change very quickly through some requirement of NSP or the Nuclear
Regulatory Agency. It would be risky business to spend thousands
and thousands of dollars on property which the City has no legal
control over.
If the Council is interested in developing ballfields, it appears
to be more advantageous to do that development on property which
is controlled by the City. Ono such area already planned for
the development of ballfields is Outlet A in the Meadow Oak
Subdivision lying between Interstate 94 and Meadow Oak Avenue.
This property is not currently dedicated park land. However,
one of the conditions with the davolopment to that this piece
of property be dedicated park land as the development of the
Meadow Oak properties continue. There was also some discussion
that the developer would be responsible for the cost of construction
of the park. It may be to his advantage to dedicate this as
park earlier if the City would do the development. Certainly
the development of this property as park land and ballfiolds
would give more axpoaura to his property and possibly speed
the development process along.
There to easily room enough in the Meadow Oak property for the
construction of two ballfields. Thera to already existing largo
diameter water service to the property and eanitary sewer service.
By roforring to the above tabulation, it to easily soon that
there could ba an immediate savings of $7,000.00 or $8,000.00
because th000 utilities aro in. Development of those fields
could tako place during 1985, and the existing fencing at tho
NSP fioldo could be moved lata in 1985 or early 1986. The fields
would than be ready for first play in 1986. One drawback to
thio particular site, however, is that there is not sufficient
room to construct the ultimate four field ballpark, which may
or may not be needed within tho next tan years or no. The following
is a tabulation of oomo oxpoctod development coats of two fields
at tho Meadow Oak sito.
_10-
Council Agenda - 1/28/85
Leveling Black Dirt, Lime,
Seed, and Sod S 1,200.00
Labor $ 2,000.00
Relocate Fence $ 1,500.00
Parking (gravel surface) S 500.00
Extend Sewer and Water
Service to Field Area S 600.00
Below Ground Sprinkler
System (material) $ 2,135.00
(labor) $ 1,200.00
Total $ 9,135.00
Again, some of the other costs at the NSP ballfield would be
also included here. These would be such costs as the $600.00
per year for the portable restroom rental, garbage pickup, etc.
If a concession stand and restroom were built in this area,
we would expect the cost to be in the area of $15,000.00 or
more, same as previously mentioned. In addition, the lighting
system could easily exceed $7,500.00.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. This alternative would be to leave things pretty much as
they are and do only the mowing that we have done at the
parka in the past, leaving the responsibility totally to
the Monticello Sottball Association.
2. This alternative would be to develop the NSP ballfioldo
as planned, upgrading the wall, etc.
3. This alternative would be to only do a minimal amount of
upgrading at the NSP ballfiolds and possibly take over tho
caro and maintonanco of the fioldo, full well realizing
that the fields may still be substandard.
e. This alternative would be to find another location for the
ballfields on property which the City hoo full control over
and slowly, over a period of time, develop high quality
ballfiolds and amenities to attract now toame to Monticello
and keep the existing teams hare.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Although the staff has no firm recommendation and loavoe the
docloion to the City Council, we would suggest that if ballfiolds
are developed that they be dovolopod to a point whore they are
maintained in oxcollont condition and arc an attraction to Monticello,
rather than an eyosoro or nuisanco.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Provioue latter from Monticello Softball Association.
TO: THE 14ONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
°ROM: THE MONTICELLO SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION
Please find enclosed a proposal for some help from the City of Monticello in maintaining th,
softball flolds. In the past the city has been some help on different expenses that the
softball assoc. has had. At the present, the softball fields are in very poor conditions al
the league has just started these past few years, losing teams to other leagues. And as
citizens of Monticello we have always had pride in the facilities that the City of Monticell
has had.
The reasons for the difficulties the league has had, the reasons why some of the teams are
leaving this league, and what some of the other leagues are doing to maintain good fields
are explained In a short outline that follows.
The softball fields are used in most cases by the league. But you will also find that other
people are involved out there. The necessary improvements needed will not benefit just the
softball league.
The following is a proposal that the league would like to present to the city:
1. That the city maintain and bring up to good or excellent standards, the softball
fields. This being with the help of the a" well that is on the property.
2. That in the future years the city be involved with there Quality equipment and peopl
In keeping the fields in excellent shape.
1. That the city maintain the costs of the satellites and dumping in which they have
done in the past.
4. That the city maintais the costs of regular garbage dumping which is needed from
year to year.
S. That the costs of all above be born on an equal Mels between the city and the soft-
ball association. Knowing that for the first few years that the city may not re-
ceive enough funding from the association, but that the balance of the future years
the amount received from the association may more than cover the costs to. the city,
some thought must be retained on how that would be handled in the future.
We hope to have most of the questions you may have, answered in the outline of with out
presence at the neat meeting. Thank you very much for your time.
Cary L. Reitan President
Kenneth Kalway SkellfW a3sk-1
Creg Rask Vice President
Mike Offerdshl Secretary
0
WORK `NEEDED ON THVF E LDS
FIELD NI
1. 'Thts'•summer'
e, "regulat fertilising as deemed necessary.
b: eegular mowing of fields with city to be notified.
e: regular watering to be done as per the• above necessities..
2: This fell
a. black dirt to be hauled in to make fields smoother, especially right field.
b: seeding where necIessaty espeetally:in the outfields.
e'. fall fei`t,il'iiing.
3. Future years
a. regular fertilising as deemed necessary.
b. fence repair all around.
1. E!s les.
2. tightehon fence.,
3—tepitr-_gates.
FIELD p2
1: 'Tlile'eummer � _
s. 'regul`ar fertilising ae-neeeaeeiy.•
b 'regular nio-Ing of [told.
er .regulit, watoting:
u _ d
• _.
2-.; fTAls:fall, 7;-.
!black 'dile-toibc'KiuledIii, :6,mak o, 4ldIAe'amooihet_,;aepeeisIIY,jn,putflold.'orce.
b:; se6aI -- ':ae ne'eaeo__oty`c'' - " '
C. fall 'ferctltiing.
3.r..- Fututa years
o., ,regul"at fortilIaihg. -_
?b., minorfenee and' gato repair
t � r
OTHER,'AREAS', ;
1,. The driveway around the fields needs sometype of 'fill to allminato the potholes that
s;'so bad. Thls has, bean attempted sItoady thin year by the league. Other work already done by
*11eague was fill brought in to lengthen the bases and lime brought in to kill the gross of ex.
tided infield.
J
(2) -- - - I
FINANCIAL HISTORY OF THE LEAGUE
A.
1979 -----Net loss of $24.55
1
I. Expenses
a. Umpire fees paid $2276.75
b. Softballs $426.57
c. Concession expenses $1558.59
d. misc. (bases, sanction fees, beer license, satellites etc) $945.00
e. Total expcndatures $5206.91
2. Income
a. League entry fees, tournament, billboards, concessions.
b. Total $5182.36
3. Note --the city covered the dram shop ins. for the above year.
B.
1980 -----Net profit of $1,247.83
1. Expenses
a. concession expenses $3173.22
b. softballs $381.46
c. well repair $305.87
d. garbage pickup $218.75
e. Olson and Sons Electric (1978 repairs--) $642.82
I. Misc. expenses (beat lic., sanction fees, billboards etc) $826.65
q. Total ' $5548 . 77
(
2. Income
a. Entry fees, tournament, billboards, concessions, etc. $6.796.60
3. Note, city paid Dram shop Ins.
C.
1981 -------Nat profit of $1138.43
1. Expenses
a. Concessions $2343.59
b. Dram shop Ins. $912.00
c. Bases $328.91
d. softballs $510.14
e. Misc. $682.87
f. Well repair (pressure tank) $191.10
g. Gas (for hauling aouipment for black dirt on fields) $295.20
h. Crass soed and field mantanance $505.21
I. Garbage pick up $125.00
J. Total $5994.02
2. Income
a. Entry fees, tournament, billboards, concessions
b. Total $7132.45
D.
1982 -----Net profit of $83.67
1. Expenses
a. softballs $577.15
b. garbage $225.00
c. Misc. $275.18
d. Trophies $209.00
e. Sanction fees $580.00
g
1. Total $1666.33
(3)
2. Income
a. Entry fees, Billboards
b. Total $1750.00
+++oea+ In 1982 only 1 field was used because of the seeding that had taken place the year bL_)
Because of only I field we held no league tournament and did not open concession stand
because of reduced nightly attendance.
E. 1983 ---Net Loss of $633.70
1. Expenditures
a. umpire sanctioning $300.00
b. Paint supplies $171.77
c. Trophies (tournament and League) $305.86
d. Misc. $658.32
a. Garbage $220.00
f. softballs $1310.58
g. league sanction and tournaments $523.50
h. concession supplies ' $999.28
i. Total $4489.31
2. Income
a. entry fees and tournament
b. Total $3855.61
tr+++•O. 1n 1983 the Monticello J.C.'a took over the concession stand and ran it for the year wi
a profit to them of approx. $1200-1400 with no, return to the league, but the monies pu
to good use by the JC's.
WHAT OTHER LEAGUES ARE DOING
A. Buffalo l.caguc
1. Maintained by the city
2. $250 entry fee from cacti team goes to the city for maintenance and the city pays
for the costs of umpiring.
3. If they get at least 10 teams this year the entry per team will be $200.
4. The city or league gets the concessions
B. Montrose League
I. All team fees go to the Montrose Softball Inc. of three men who take care of the
fields themselves
2. They also run the concessons.
C. Rockford League
I. League maintains new league formed
2. One time loan to League of $10,000. to be paid back to the city, time unknown.
3'. ,They run and collect from their own concession stand
D. Big Lake League
1. Property owned by school
2. Malntanined by the school
3. Expenses to the league unknown at this time.
CE. Annandale League
I. City collects $275-$300 from each team for maintenance
2. Has lights and fields expenses paid by city
3. City out of League fee pays for umpires
4. Pays city extra $50.00 for cost to run tournament for lights
5. No concessions
6. Due to POOL payments to city the city was currently running ahead in payments made
league, until the city dust installed now lights.
F. Elk River League
1. City owns fields and maintains
2. League fee goes to city (approx.$290)
3. League has lights.
4. Unk what else.
G. Becker League
1. Unk what happens but the land we believe belong& to the Legion club who operates tl
concession stand.
IN
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Administration
YEAR END/YEAR BEGINNING
The year just ended, 1984, was a very busy year, but the business
conducted was largely establishing a posture for upcoming years.
Planning and coordinating, preparing for eventual implementation
were where a majority of staff effort was concentrated. Clearly,
the activity in the Building Department was heavy, and Gary
will respond to that area.
In the area of public works, we saw the issue of raised channelization
in the downtown resolved, largely through the efforts of Howard
Dahlgren. With that stumbling block removed, MN/DOT is ,proceeding
with the design of the new bridge and T.H. 25. Related to that,
the City knowing it would lose part of East Bridge Park opened
and closed negotiations on the Saxon property. We took advantage
of an opportunity and will be well prepared when reconstruction
begins. Also related to T.H. 25 reconstruction is the installation
of interim traffic signals at T.H. 25 and Oakwood Drive. Having
long been a sensitive issue, the solution slowly moved through
the various bureaucratic channels to a point where we see those
lights becoming operable. Last year we planned, this year we
act.
In lata summer, we began in earnest preparing for the now Fire
Hall. After review and interview of several architectural firms,
the City engaged TKDA to do the job. The Committoo mot several
times, and, while our differences were substantial in the beginning,
we stayed with our task until we agrood on a concept that suited
everyone, including the voters. We faced obstacles related
to Biting. We overcame them, and the Fire Hall will go up in
1985.
Almost all of 1984 was dedicated to establishing a franchise
for cable communications. A long and complex process with many
special interests, the SWC4 worked hard at acquiring the beat
possible system to servo our areas. We think wo got it. The
system will be activated in Monticello in 1985.
Although the City played only a minor role, we saw the Hospital
District develop and proceed with plane on the Nuroing Homo.
In a good example of planning and cooperation, we oaw the Hospital
and City work togothor to resolve a oito difficulty, the result
of which made both parties winners. Now in 1985, we see construction
underway.
It has evolved into one of the more time consuming and complex
tasks we've ever taken on, but the revision of the Comprehensive
Plan was completed, and the Zoning Ordinance is under review.
My original time estimates were off by quite a bit. I do not,
however, want to compromise the document to meet deadlines.
We have a good plan and good ordinance with which we do well.
Our goal is to improve it, to address now concerns, but we needn't
be in a hurry. Planning and zoning is the one area where the
maxim "If it ain't broke, dont fix it" doesn't necessarily
apply. Land use planning is in a constant state of flux and
needs to be under constant review.
Other major planning efforts began in 1984 and will carry over
into 1985. At budget time, the Council made a commitment to
several goals. A levy for 5100,000.00 was instituted to establish
a fund for the interceptor sewer. Dollars were committed to
a new water study. Money was set aside for a Downtown Revitalization
Study. Staff efforts went into preparing for computer needs.
Discussions began with respect to identifying individual parcels
needed for the collector street extension. A proposal was made
to and accepted by the Malonee for one section of that street.
In 1984, the NRA acquired Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 in Oakwood in
anticipation of IxI's expansion.
Not all of 1984 was planning. We saw the reconstruction of
( Hart and Cedar and the beginning of County Road 39 resurfacing.
The City rocoivod a UDAG in the amount of $243,500.00 which
was then channeled to Fulfillment Systema to supplement their
IRB's and Tax Increment Financing. That now structure is already
occupied. IxI built four more buildings and bought Lot 6 from
the HRA, preparing for their expansion. Punch card voting was
implomented in 1984 to mixed roviowa. I think experience will
eliminate the confusion. Certainly the economic recovery gsnarated
activity. Par Woet was completed, 100% by the dovoloper. Two
now restaurants were built. A now office building, utilizing
TIF,opened for business. A now bank oponod, an 9 6 L began
construction. In tho downtown, wo lost coma businaasea, but
we also gainod coma. In coaanco, 1984 has boon active. Wo
aro propared for 1985.
For tho year 1985. I hope to achieve certain goalo, some of
which arc tontativa, coma aro moraly matter of fact. As a matter
of fact we will coo cable communications complotod and activated.
Barring unforeseen circumotancos, we will complete and occupy
our now Firo Hall. Through the nocoosity of Piro flail construction,
we will coo ono potrolcum bulk plant rolocato. I havo a goal
of cooing all bulk plants relocated out of the commercial area
to a more suitable zona.
`
-2-
In the realm of personnel, we must complete our comparable worth
study. I also have goals of completing a new personnel policy
and a new employee performance evaluation system. Both the
policy and the evaluation system are under development at this
time.
In 1985, we will complete the Zoning Ordinance revision. As
new provisions and zones are developed, I anticipate new growth
alternatives, new housing concepts, and conversions of vacant
land to occupied land. New areas and projects will generate
new interest. We cannot, however, forget our existing facilities.
Expansion, renovation, and rehabilitation of the Central Business
District should be considered. A plan of action and development
shall be proposed and presented to our merchants. We will attempt
to unify the City's commercial interests under a single goal.
Stimulating the commercial areas of the City will not detract
from our ongoing industrial development efforts. It is my goal
to see the creation of 100 new jobs in 1985.
With respect to City services, my goal is to make the actual
computer conversion in 1985. While such a conversion is not
intended to eliminate personnel, it is meant to increase the
efficiency and the capability of rendering service. Having
started in 1984. I want the City to complete the acquisition
of right-of-way for all of the Lauring Lane collector system.
We may not construct any roadway, but I hope to have the platted
street established. Also related to public works, we will see
the completion of a now water study. Based on the findings
of that study, my goal is to sec the City begin to implement
the upgrading of the system, including the attendant annexation
if nocoosary.
Laotly, and this goal comae without any figures before me. I
want to hold the 1986 Budget at the same level as the 1985 Budget.
I realize that we are only three weeks into this year's budget,
but I am already setting my sights on the process and the result.
Bolding the line will be a determining factor.
This then is how I visualize the past year and the upcoming
year. I hope that as Council direction helps formulate other
goals, we will continue to press for one major goal, to wit,
the continued quality of service and government in Monticello.
-3-
DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORT
Wastewater Treatment Plant and Collection System (J.S.)
1984 saw the final acceptance of the WWTP project. With the
exception of one test in December, the WWTP has been meeting
its limitations. 1984, however, was not without problems at
the WWTP. This year saw the replacement of the air compressors
and the air dryer at the WWTP, and problems with the ballast
in both the second stage digester and the sludge storage tank.
In addition, we found that odor problems still persisted at
the WWTP. In addition, the Variable Speed Drive unit at the
main lift pumps was inoperable for much of 1984.
1985 will see the corrections of all of the problems encountered
in 1984. We will continue to work on the odor control problem
at the WWTP. 1985 will see some attention to our collection
system. A portion of the interceptor sever will be built under
Highway 25 and Cedar Street. Plane and specifications, which
were ordered along with Hart and Cedar, should be ready for
your review within the next month or so. We will begin doing
some work on the old trunk line through the Bondhus property.
L Significant leakage was found in this area during a routine
investigation in 1984. 1985 will sea us address come of the
root growth in our main sower lines through the use of now technology.
It will oloo be a year of repair on utilities and manholoo on
Broadway and Highway 25 in readiness for the projects forthcoming.
Water Department (J.S.)
1984 saw the addition to both pump houaee in the downtown area.
We added a standby power angina to wall No. 2 for those periods
when we were without electricity in the downtown area. We uncovered
coma significant pitting and datorioration in the existing water
tower, which will have to be addressed in 1985. 1984 also saw
the addition of a drain to our water reservoir.
1985 to to be a year in which our water system to addressed
through the completion of a now updated water study. We expect
to make the necessary repairs to the oxiating water Lover and
clean the reservoir. wall No. 1 is duo to have the deep wall
turbine pump pulled for inspection and the necessary repairs
made. This year will also ace the updating of our alarm system
for water and the addition of coma locating equipment for locating
lines and pipes when we have insufficient or incorrect data.
1985 will ace the replacement of at least one main water valva
on Broadway and a thorough investigation of all the water ayetam
on Highway 25 prior to that project,a beginning in 1986.
Parks W .S.)
1984 saw the beginning of the Par West Health Course theme park.
Much of this project is completed. West Bridge Park was given
somewhat of a facelift with a new roof over the existing warming
house and a now Hex picnic shelter built with the cooperation
of the City and the Lions Club. 1984 saw our continued effort
toward planting trees. Country Club Park received several.
In this year the Hillcrest playground structure was replaced,
and the Fourth Street playground structure was removed due to
its deteriorated condition.
1985 will see the further development of the Country Club Park
and the completion of the Par West Health Course theme park,
along with the installation of some minor playground equipment
such as a sand box. More trees will be planted in all of the
parks, and work is expected to begin in the ballfields. 1985
will see the City either adding an additional tractor mower
or contracting out some of the grass mowing.
Streets and Alleys (J.S.)
1984 saw the addition of more streets to the City of Monticello.
With the completion of the Par West project, the addition of
the Meadow Oak project, and the start of the extension of Sandberg
Road, there are more miles of streets now in Monticello than
over before. In addition to those projects, we saw the rebuilding
of Hart and Codar Streets to modern, updated thoroughfares.
In 1984 the City of Monticello switched to a granite typo of
chip aaalcoat rather than the round poa rock. We replaced one
of the pickups in the Strout Department along with a paint striper
for street work. We saw the addition to the staff in the Streets
and Alloys as wall as the Parka.
1985 will sou the completion of the Broadway reconstruction
project and the design of the Highway 25 project. Soalcoating
is expected to resume to a full -sired project, and one of the
old snowplow trucks will be replaced.
Shop and Garage W .S.)
1984 now the addition to the equipment at the Shop and Garage.
A largo grinder woo added. along with an AC -DC weldor and hydraulic
press. In 1984, City staff insulated two atalla in their now
polo barn and installed natural gas host. Two door operators
were installed in the polo barn as wall.
1985 will sou painting of the existing masonry Maintenance Building
and two more door operators added to the polo barn.
-2-
Tree Program (J.S.)
1984 saw the tagging of 68 Dutch Elm Diseased trees in the City
of Monticello. Of these 68 trees, 17 trees have been cut or
will be cut by the City of Monticello. A 1985 estimate is 65-75
trees will contact Dutch Elm Disease.
Miscellaneous O.S. )
1984 saw the passing of the Employee Right to Know Act. The
City of Monticello is currently involved in the training of
employees in connection with hazardous materials which they
may come in contact with. we are also working toward the completion
of the Property Management Program for the City of Monticello.
Both of these projects should be complete in 1985.
c
C' DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORT
Economic Development, 1984 (A. P.)
My position as Director of Economic Development has enabled
me to work with the Chamber of Commerce, the Industrial Development
Committee, the HRA, and the City of Monticello. The last 12
months have been both challenging and rewarding. The following
are some of 1984'8 accomplishments.
I have completed a business directory for all Monticello businesses.
Information obtained included name of each business, contact
person, addresses, telephone numbers, and number of employees.
This information is matched with past employment history and
indicates increases/decreases in the work force. Significant
increases were seen in 1984. Self-employed individuals increased
by 19.2%, the professional service oriented firms increased
by 8.4%, the retail firma increased by 12.6%, commercial by
5.7%, and industry by 27.9%.
Many activities that I am involved in aro somewhat related to
the construction or addition of now buildings, atc. Thin has
boon adequately covered by Cary Anderson's report in the January 3,
1985, edition of the Monticello Times. Two major projects completed
in 1984 were the construction of four now buildings at IXI and
the expansion of FSI to their now home on Lauring Lane.
Administering FSI's U.D.A.C. funds has boon completed. A tremendous
amount of time and work want into the application process, entering
the grant agreement, compiling and submitting the Legally Binding
Commitments to H.U.D., rocoiving the Lotter of Credit, and paying
out the $243,500.00 of grant funds.
Other areas of responsibility during tho pact year included
bacoming Diractor/Socratory of the Houoing and Rodovolopmant
Authority. Although the HRA predominantly dealt with industrial
activity and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) in particular, they
did deal with housing to coma degree. A firm stand was taken
by the HRA not to change tho TIF boundaries and to not allow
housing projects to utilize TIF.
Economic Davolopment, 1985 (A.P.)
1984 wan a tremendous year, and 1985 looks to be as good or
better. Some activities that were initiated in 1984 were not
completed but will culminate in 1985. For example, the HRA
actively pursued redeveloping the old Ford Ccraga, and Ito tenants
came forth with a plan to bring the building up to coda and
remodel it inside and outside. The HRA also actively sought
to redevelop the property owned by Mr. and Mrs. Haas. Progress
has been made but a lot needs to be done for redeveloping it.
These are two of the HRA's main concerns for 1985.
Other projects started in 1984 that are to be completed in 1985
are: The Metcalf 6 Larson Elderly Housing Project is expected
to begin in the spring; Key Tool 6 Plastics is also planning
to begin construction of their new 23,000 sq. ft. building in
the spring.
I am currently working with several firms who are considering
expansion and/or relocation. For reasons of confidentiality,
the firms cannot be mentioned at this point. Along with the
present prospective firms, I have initiated a business contact
program that will enable me to actively see 2-3 decision makers
per week through 1985. Some of this activity will result in
now industry for Monticello.
This activity, along with my other Chamber, HRA, Industrial
and Development Committee, and City activities, will result
in a successful 1985. One project for 1985 will benefit all
five unite above. We are investigating the possibility of a
City of Monticello magazine that can be used as a multi-purpose
brochure, etc.
-2-
DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORT
Building Inspection (G.A.)
The majority of the Building Inspection report was in the article
printed in the January 3 edition of the Monticello Times. I-11
just give you a brief recap of it as follows.
We had a total of 191 permits issued, with a total dollar valuation
of $7,581,746.00. The total amount of money brought in in net
building permit and plan review fees was $42,399.78. Total
State surcharge fees collected was $3,807.90. We had 30 single
family houses built this year, with one duplex, and 3 multiple
family housing unite consisting of two 24 -unit apartment buildings
and one 8 -unit townhouse building. We also had 16 new commercial
buildings and 4 new industrial buildings, with 17 new garages
built this year. Over the last 10 -year period, this is the
highest total valuation of building permits issued in the City
of Monticello. Previous high was when the Monticello Nuclear
Plant was built.
With the current market and economic conditions, we look for
the total building permit valuation and the total number of
permits toincrease over the previous high totals exceeded in
1984. Poo aiblo expectations are being over $35 million in now
construction by the tat of Juno. With the increased communication
and another year behind us, good public relations, and the building
contractors in this area, we look forward to a smooth, more
efficient run inspection schedule for 1985. With incroasod
building activity, we look for no additional increase to this
Dopartmont-a staff.
Planning and Zoning (G.A.)
Zoning activity over the pant year has increased significantly
to reflect the increased building activity. With the existing
ordinance as is, we have aeon many changes which need to take
place and more clarity within our Zoning Ordinance. We had
a lot of activity at Planning Commission level, sometimes very
controversial and hectic; but overall. I think we had a very
good year an a Planning Commission. We had some controvaraice
between staff and Planning Commission, and also between Planning
Commission and Council at different times throughout the year.
We think we would like to open up more communicationo amongst
City staff, Planning Commission members, and City Council mombors
to try and create a more open typo policy.
For 1985, we look for completion of the Comprehensive Plan,
which was started in late April of 1984. With the implementation
of a now Comprehensive Plan, we hope to have a more explicit,
more meaningful Zoning Ordinance which the everyday person can
pick up and read and be able to understand the intent of the
ordinance as adopted. The new ordinance section of the Comprehensive
Plan will by no means be acceptable to everybody's favor, but
the intent of it is to more clearly define each and every section
of the ordinance for interpretation. The Planning Commission
has taken a new perspective as far as any matters brought to
their Planning Commission. They have met with City Council
members and also with City staff and would like to go with the
concept of a more slow, meaningful, more productive approach
to the development of the City. They will no longer, under
any circumstances, accept anything before them for public hearing
or otherwise until it has been completely reviewed by City staff,
Consulting Engineer, and Consulting Planner before coming before
them so the product that does come before them is completely
ready for their approval or denial. Overall, we would like
to establish, as City staff, a more open type policy between
Commission members, City Council, and City staff. If we have
any problems or any comments on any particular Planning Commission
or City Council decision that we air our comments openly amongst
the three bodies involved and not hide things and bring them
up at a later time. With the proposed increase in building
activity for 1985, we also look for increased proposed requests
coming before the Planning Commisoion.
Assessment (C.A.)
With the incr0000d building activity, 1986 showed an increase
in now construction valuation for the City. We olo o have seen
within the valuations of property a lot more rosidantlal properties
put on the market for sale, not necessarily because of the necessity
to coil proportion, but also people jumping into the market
and exploring the possibilioe of marketing their property.
Porcontags-wiao for the 1984 ansesomont, we are running about
931 of the sale price of the houses calling in residential,
and commercial were at about 896. Of the few sales that we
have, the value on the commorcial property is at 89% of what
they sold for.
For the 1985 assessment, we aro looking at bringing our land
valuoo up and reducing our house values for vary little incroaao,
if any, some increase in soma areas and soma docroa son in other
areas of residential properties. In commercial proportion,
we are rocoiving come inclination from the State that they would
like to do an overall ro-acc000mont of commorcial proportion.
We aro acknowledging that come, if not quite a few, proportion
aro low; bnt the policy of the County Aeaessor is to remain
at the lovol which he has indicated the properties to be valued
at, and he is pretty much waiting to sea what the State would
like to have Wright County do, pretty much playing tho "wait
and coal' game. If commercial properties have to be increased.
Cpretty much lot the State put an overall increase on commercial
-2-
properties, which isn't the fair approach either when some properties
�_• are up to their level of assessment and other properties are
low. They should be just dealing with the properties that are
low. But that's not the intent of the State. Overall, our
assessment is right up with the State requirements as far as
percentage of the ratio of sale price to actual estimated market
value.
Civil Defense (G.A.)
Last year at about this time, we were gearing up for possible
flooding with the closing of the Monticello Nuclear Plant.
With the supplies purchased and very little flooding, if any,
occurring, the supplies are remaining on hand as needed. We
did, however, have one nuclear disaster exercise as required
by the State of Minnesota, which is very much incidental to
the real exercise which usually occurs. With very little severe
weather or any disaster really relating from adverse weather
conditions, it was a relatively quiet year for Civil Defense.
For 1985, with the Nuclear Plant being up and running at full
capacity by this week's end, we aro seeing the river channel
opening up and the ice breaking up along with it. Therefore,
we aro not foreseeing any real flooding occurring yet this late
winter or early in the spring. Unless we have a vary significant
amount of snowfall between now and early spring, we should see
very little, if any, possibility of flooding occurring again
within the City limits of Monticello. We do have a nuclear
disaster exercise planned as required by the federal government
for somotima in the summer of 1985. With no details on it yet,
we are planning for some typo of physical involvement within
thin exorcise compared to the sit-down in EOC Headquarters activity
as the fall exercise was. Without any severe weather and any
dioastars related from that, we look forward to another fairly
quiet year in Civil Dofonoo.
City Hall Maintenance (G.A.)
1984 saw the installation of our now heating exchanger in our
heating and cooling system; and othor than periodic maintenance
and small parte, we did sea our City Hall mechanical systems
go on to d preventive maintenance schedule system. Within the
scheduled maintenance system, tho currant maintenance contractor,
Comfort Craft of St. Cloud, has just rocantly referred us on
to McDowell Company, also of St. Cloud, to carry on with any
omorgency situations until a now service contract bo lot out
in late February, early March, for bids. Comfort Craft
loot their main man that took caro of mechanical maintenance
of our system harp in Monticello and the owner of the company
suggested that we go with the main paront company of his
company, McDowall Company, to carry out any emergency
situation and be available to submit a bid for preventive
-3-
maintenance work for the 1985 year. Other than minor leaks
to our roof system, we did see the exterior bricks of the City
Hall building sealed for 1984 and put on a scheduled maintenance
of resealing of the brick every 5-7, maybe even 10 years, on
down the road.
For 1985, we look forward to a new scheduled maintenance contract
with a different company, putting it up for bids late February,
early March. Also, we have budgeted for replacement of the
roof shingles on the City Hall building and looking for possible
consultation with a specialist in the field of roof systems.
We will consult with him for a specified fee for information
in regards to a complete reroofing system or going over the
existing roof system we have to achieve the beet possible results,
short term and long term, for this building. Also, one thing
to look at which was not budgeted at budget time was for the
resealing of the existing beams and decking on the interior
of our City Hall building. I feel very strongly that this should
be done sometime during the summer months of 1985. with the
scheduled maintenance on the mechanical system, the new roof
being installed on the building, the bricks being sealed on
the exterior of our building, the possibility of the interior
roof beams and decking being resealed, other than minor maintenance
situations which might occur, we feel that the current City
Hall building is back onto a scheduled type of maintenance within
the building as a whole.
-4-
DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORT
Senior Citizen Center (K.H.)
As Director of the Senior Citizens Center, I have complete responsibility
for all planning and coordinating of a large variety of programs,
services, and activities, both at the Center and in community
involvement. This portion of my job is comparable to a program
director job classification.
In addition to the areas covered under program director, I am
also hostess, responsible for all purchases for lunches and
dinners, maintenance, woodworking, rug making, ceramics, classes
and services. I personally serve on community organizations,
representing the Center or see that a Senior representative
is present.
I do a lot of information and referral. Counseling of all kinds
is a frequent demand on my time. Over the years I have built
up enough rapport with the Seniors that I am often called to
attend them when they are ill, on/off duty hours. This has
included going in the ambulance, or personally taking them to
the doctor or hospital.
Writing grants for moniea to enhance the Cantor is very time
consuming, as well as heading all fund raisere.
I attend as many meetings and conferences as possible, so I
am constantly learning and getting now ideas.
I teach many of the classes offered at the Canter. I aloo organize
and attend all off duty activities offered for the Seniors.
My goals for 1985 will be to incroace the quality of services
and recreational activities now offered at the Center. I hope
to continuo the rate of growth in participants that we have
built up over the years, and key in on doing more for the frail
elderly population.
DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORT
Y.M.C.A. (M.M.)
1986 Report
Referral Source and Reason for Referral Summary
Males Females
Total Clients 78 32
Source of Referrals
Court 61
Welfare 9
School 20
Self 11
Family 6
Peer 3
Roforral Source DW Assessed
Reason for Roason for
Referral Referral
CRunaway
5
0
Inappropriate School Behavior
12
0
Drug Abuse
9
5
Property Crime
36
0
Violent Crime
3
0
Unmanageable Home Behavior
5
0
Family Problems
20
70
Self Estcom
1
5
Sexual Abuse
6
6
Physical Abuse or Neglect
2
2
Vocational Asaintanco
2
12
Survival Needs
12
12
duplicated
counts
1986 Work Program Goals
1. Work with 100 clients referred by court, school,
wolfaro, individuals or othor appropriate agencies.
2. Conduct individual counsoling with clients.
3. Conduct group counaaling using rostitution work
groups, 3 NYPUM groups and traditional group
counseling using YMCA sottingo.
6. Assist clionto and families in mooting basic needs.
Performance to 1984 Work Program Goals
1. 110 Clients (62 "active" at present).
2. Individual counseling with all 110 clients.
3. 27 kids in restitution groups.
26 kids in NYPUM groups.
10 kids in talk group.
4. Assisted people dealing with county, hospitals,
treatment centers, employment services, and court
situations. Delivered approximately 500 pounds
of food this winter to clients in need.
1984 "Result" Goal
1. Achieve a 758 nonrecidivism rate among court referred
clients for the duration of their participation in my
program and the 6 months following termination.
Performance to 1984 Result Goal
1. Nonrecidivism rate of 83.6%. 51 Clients having no
juvenile justice involvement during the specified
term. 10 having various degrees of involvement.
1985 Work Program Goals
1. Work with 100 clients referrod by court, school,
welfare, individuals or other appropriate agencies.
2. Conduct individual counseling with clients.
3. Conduct group counseling using restitution work groups,
3 NYPUM groups, and traditional group counseling using
YMCA settings.
4. Aooist clients and families in mooting basic needs.
5. Develop subsidized youth employment program at YMCA
Camp during summer of 1985.
1985 Result
1. Achieve a 756 nonrocidiviam roto among court referred
clients during their participation in the program and
the 6 months following their termination.
--_ .- -__----:tet--_ - -- _ - -- - -
- ------ -_.. -- -�- .�
GENERAL FUND - JANUARY - 1985
AMOUNT
CHECK Ni
Northern States Power - Utilities
9.510.03
20008
Gary Anderson - Misc. mileage
61.33
20009
M.Y. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
205.00
20010
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
102.00
20011
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
324.00
20012
Banker's Life Ins. - Croup Ins.
4,086.14
20013
M. State Treasurer - lns. premium - L. Cillham
9.00
20014
National Life' Ins. - T. Eidem ins. premium
100.00
20015
Wright County Highway Dept. - Sand 6 salt mixture
1,608.75
20016
B. F. Goodrich - Tires
112.96
20017
AME Ready Mix Co. - Sand
46.50
20018
Big Lake Lumber - Materials for Mtce. Building - insulation
670.25
20019
Seita. Hardware - Misc. supplies
492.34
20020
Coast to Coast - Misc. supplies
313.79
20021
National Bushing - Misc. supplies
211.99
20022
PLY. St. Supt. Assoc. - Annual dues for Roger Mack
15.00
20023
PBi. Park Supervisors Assoc. - Annual dues for Roger Mack
15.00
20014
0. K. Hardware - Misc. supplies
60.39
20025
Orkin Exterminating - Contract payment for Jan. - WWTP
106.00
20026
The Plumbery - Supplies for Mtce. Bldg.
334.11
20027
Monticello Printing - Printing fuel recnrrl books
85.70
20028
Monticello Times - Adv. 6 council minutes
316.04
20029
Ind. Lumber Co. - Supplies for Mtce. Bldg. 6 WWTP
287.99
20030.
Jerry's Auto Salvage - Wheel and tube
30.00
20031
Monticello Office Products - Supplies for all Depts.
153.97
20032
Harry's Auto Supply - Misc. supplies
157.90
20033
Ben Franklin - Film
18.74
20034
Central McCowan - Cyl. rental and oxygen
23.18
20035
Sherburne County Equipment - Misc. screws, bolts, etc. - St.
354.18
20036
Unitog Rental Services - Uniform rental for Dec.
140.80
20037
Ruff Auto Parte - 3 radio antennas 6 speaker
65.00
20038
Snyder Drug - Batteries for Fire Dept.
43.62
20039
Ranger Products - Supplies for WWTP
55.40
20040
McDowall Co. - Repair furnace at City Hall
301.30
20041
Poper,Calmenson 6 Co. - Snow plow blades
211.42
20042
MN. MFOA - Membership fee for R. Wolf Steller
10.00
20043
Monticello Fire Dept. - Reimbursement for expenses in 1984
225.00
20044
State of MN. - Sub. to State Rcglacer
136.89
20045
Howard Dahlgren Assoc. - Nov. and Dec. Planning fees
309.00
20046
Audio Communications - Radios for Civ. Def. 6 mobile radios
5,846.00
20047
Thomas Patco Co. - Tow rope, log chain - St. Dept.
124.00
20048
Tractioneer Co. - Tire chain - St. Dept.
464.75
20049
Fyle Backhoe 6 Sever Service - Steaming water main shut -offs
60.00
20050
Century Laboratories - Deodorizer 6 durabrite - WW'rP
854.38
10051
Brock White Co. - Reinforced plastic - WWTP
180.00
20052
AT 6 T Information Systems - Fire phone charges
3.59
20053
Stnte Treasurer - Surplus Property Fund - Storage cab., etc.
104.50
20054
Maus Foods - Supplies for all Depts.
251.77
20055
Transport Clearings - Freight for cutting blades from Zeigler
27.00
20056
Gordon Link - Gas for St.Dept.
1,663.50
20057
Cruys, Johnson - Computer chargee for November, 1984
290.00
20058
Phillips Petro. Co. - Cas
27.65
20059
Wright County Highway - Raimb. county for 1984 CSAH mtce.
583.77
20060
Business 6 Industrial Comm. - 1984 contribution from City
4,000.00
20061
Buffalo Bituminous - Payment on city projacto
1,998.00
20062
Braun Engineering - Tasting at new Piro (tall alto
1.309.50
20063
Monticello -Big Lake Pet Hospital - Vet face thru Jan.
486.00
20064
Local 049 - Union dues �Q
D
126.00
20065
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Wright County Treasurer - Fee for mailing Homestead cards
251.24
200E
Hoglund Bus Co. - Parts
19.93
200,
Thomas Eidem - Car allowance for Jan.
300.00
20068
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll withholdings
185.04
20069
Jerry Hermes - Cleaning Library
172.92
20070
Mary Ramthun - Animal control expense
212.50
20071
Joseph Johnson - Dog pound mtce.
125.00
20072
Monticello Fire Dept. - Wages thru 12/30/84
630.00
20073
MN. State Treasurer - FICA W/H - 1/1/85 thru 1/15/85
2,883.34
20074
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H - 1/1/85 thru 1/15/85
1,553.56
20075
League of MN. Cities - Conf. reg. for T. Eidem 6 R. Wolfateller
100.00
20076
Foster Franzen Agency - Fire Dept. fidelity bonds
30.00
20077
Davie Electronic - Repairs - Fire Dept.
52.71
20078
Wright County Sheriff Dept. - Contract for Jan.
9,783.33
20079
VOID
-0-
20080
First Bank Mpls. - Public fund charge
24.00
20081
American Planning Assoc. - Sub. for Guide to Land Use Law
33.95
20082
Govt. Training Service - Reg. fee for Wm. Fair - Seminar
40.00
20083
Northwestern Bell - Fire phone charges
53.43
20084
Electronic Center - Mtce. of equipment - WWPP
20.70
20085
Central Eyewear - Glass frame for R. Cline
12.75
20086
Aspenglow Arte - Calligraphy for certificate
5.00
20087
Rockmount Research and Alloys - Welding rode - WWTP
302.61
20088
Bowman Barnes Diet. - Plow bolt, trouble light, battery,- Mtce.
266.33
20089
Chemical Engineering - Sub. for Eng. mag.
24.50
20090
Mobil 011 - Gas
40.40
20091
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone services
955.41
200'.
Norwest Bank Mple. - Misc. bond payments
624,768.95
20093)
First. Bank St. Paul - 1978 Imp. Bond payment
20,974.80
20094
Fidelity Bank 6 Trust - Water Rev. 6 G. 0. Bonds of 1971
21,881.84
20095
First National Bank of Mpla. - '75 6'83 Imp. Bonds
198,796.30
20096
First Trust St. Paul - Tax increment bonds '84 - interest
9,281.26
20097
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
214.50
20098
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
137.00
20099
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
216.00
20100
Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk 6 Co. - Door closer
48.33
20101
J M Oil Co. - Gas
341.55
20102
PLN. Dapt. of Revenue - Water oxeise tax for 4th Qtr. - 1984
268.85
20103
Gary Anderson - Mileage
99,83
20104
League of M;N. Cities - 6 copies of 1985 Directory
64.50
20105
City of Golden Valley - Joint Comparable Worth Study Program
3,840.00
20106
Flicker's T V - 10 pager batteries for Fire Dept.
31.90
20107
Conway Fire 6 Safety - Piker pole for Fire Dept.
78.00
20108
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR JANUARY - 1985
11,121,833.48
J
LIQ FUHD -- JANUARY - 1985
LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS FOR JANUARY - 1985
Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins.
VOID
Coast to Coast - Supplies
Grosslein Beverage Company - Beer, etc.
Bernick's Pepsi Cola - Misc. purchase "
Jude Candy & Tobacco - Misc. purchase
Old Dutch Foods - Misc. purchase {..'
Seven Up Bottling - Misc. purchase
Viking Coca Cola - Misc. purchase
Dick Beverage Co. - Beer
Day Dist. Co. - Beer
Thorpe Diet. Co . - Beer
Dahlheimer Diet Co. - Beer
Richard Doerr - 5 hours surveillance at Store - 12/24/84
Gary Reitan - 6 hra. surveillance at Store - 12/31/84
Ed Phillips d Sone - Liquor
Griggs, Cooper S So. - Liquor
Engle Wine Co. - Liquor
Twin City Wine - Liquor
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
M. State Treasurer - FICA W/H - 1/1/85 thru 1/15/85
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H - 1/1/85 thru 1/15/85
Gruys, Johnson 6 Assoc, - Computer chargee for Nov. -1984
Bridgewater - Telephone services
Frito Lay, Inc. - Misc. purchase
First Bank Minneapolis - 1976 G. 0. Imp. Bonds
MN. Dopt. of Revenue - Sales tax for December, 1984 1
Monticello Times - Adv, for Dec.
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR JANUARY
I
APOM CHECK
80.
364.91
11582
-0-
11583
46.85
11584
10,252.20
11585
229.75
11586
404.61
11587
77.91
11588
229.50
11589
431.60
11590
2,966.45
11591
680.45
11592
2,871.98
11593
13,576.10
11594
75.00
11595
90.00
11596
3,914.08
11597
1,548.65
11598
892.10
11599'
670.33
11600
20.00
1160
294.89
11602
172.55
11603
110.00
11604
49.25
11605
102.21
11606
22,155.00
11607
8,494.79
11608
84.00
11609
170.805.16
9/0
INDIVIDUAL PUNT ACTIVITY REPORT
- MONTH OF December , 1984
1 —T
PERMIT
DESCRIPTION
P
NAME/LOCATION
VALUATION
Fcca
NUMBER
PERMIT
SURCHARGE PLUMBING
SURCHARGE
B4-717
I
New Bay Window,. Reside East AD Don Doren/500 flee[ 4th Street
5 1,470.00
$ 14.30
5 .70
Side of House
84-718
Footings 6 Foundation
halls C 103E Com. Hosp. Diet/1104 E. River St.
$70,000.00
$343.00
$35.00
TOTALS
$71,430.00
$357.30
$35.70
PLAN CHECKING
I
1
I
'
i
84-718
Footings 6 Foundation
Walld C iNBL Com. Hosp. Diet./1104 E. River St
$ 222.95
TOTAL PLAN CHECKING FEES
$ 222.95
•
I
I
I
I
i'
•
1
TOTAL REVENUE I
S 615.95
I
I
I
I
1
I
TOTAL NO. PERMITS
16
TOTAL VAIMATION 1,032,360.00
TOTAL, FEES
5,563.63
TOTAL SURCHARGES
CURRENT EYYPIN
518.65
1PE7iMiT HAMS
_
Number
l
CITY OP MONTICELLO
Multi -family
Nonthly Building Department Report
1
Industrial
Ree. Garages
Month Of December 84
Signs
PERMITS and tJSP8
,
ALTEWICH M REPAIR
� Ik+ellings
1
Tact
This Same Month
Last Year
This Year j
PERMTTS ISSU14}
Month NOVembel
Month December Last Year
To Date
To Date i
RESIDENTIAL
SWIMInq Poole ,
Decks
Number ,
6
1 1
60
93
Valuation
1152,630.00
S 1,430.00 = 1,500.00
$2,498,127.90
$3,694,087.00
Fees
973.00
14.30 17.50
12,870.89
19,206.02
Surcharges
76.30
.70 .75
1,250.38
1,837.55
COMMERCIAL
Number
5
1
28
38
Valuation
879,730.00
70,000.00
1,914 897.40
2,111,159,00
Fees
4,347.63
565.95
10,051.66
12,876.23,
Surcharges
439.85
35.00
958.19
11055.70
IN WSTRIAL
{{i
I
Number
3
5
Valuation
681,000.00
1,776,500.00
Fees
2,266.00
8,318.53
Surcharges
340.50
688.65
PWMBING
f` Number
5
•'
36
52
`✓ Fees
243.00
1,170.00
1,979.00
Surcharges
2.50
24.50
26.00
OTHERS
Number'
10
2
Valuation
40,220.00
0
Fees
548.40
20,00
Surcharges
17.90
TOTAL NO. PERMITS
16
TOTAL VAIMATION 1,032,360.00
TOTAL, FEES
5,563.63
TOTAL SURCHARGES
CURRENT EYYPIN
518.65
1PE7iMiT HAMS
_
Number
Single Family
Duplex
Multi -family
Commercial
1
Industrial
Ree. Garages
Signs
iPublic auii4in;a
ALTEWICH M REPAIR
� Ik+ellings
1
Commercial
i
Industrial
PLUMBING
All types
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
SWIMInq Poole ,
Decks
I TEMPORARY PERMIT
DEMOLITION
TOTALS
2
2 1 137 191
71,430.00 1,50o m 5, 134, 245. 30 - 7,581,746.00
580.25 17.50 26,909.35 42,399.78
35.70 -.75 2,591.x7 _ 3,807.90
Valuation Number to Date
ElI
PPRThis year Last year.,
3 f $ 31 23
1 3
3 6
565.95 35.00 70,000.00 16 12
4 2
7 0
0 3
2 0
14.30 .70 1,430.001
$560.25 $35,70 $71,430.00
42 16
20 15
1 2
52 36
0 3
0 4
0 2
2 2
191 131