City Council Agenda Packet 07-22-1985AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
-� Monday, July 22, 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve A. Grimsmo
Council Members: Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Jack Maxwell, Dan Blonigen
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of the Minutes of the Special Meeting Held July 8,
1985, and Regular Meeting Held July B. 1985.
3. Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests and Complaints.
Old Business
d. Consideration of a Proposal to do an Annexation Study.
Nov Business
5. Development Plan for a Planned Unit Dove lopmon t -John Kornovich
6. Consideration of Furnace Replacement at the Monticello Library.
7. Consideration of Approving Cable Communications Budget.
8. Consideration of Bills for the Month of July.
9. Adjourn.
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
July 8, 1985 - 6:30 P.M.
A special meeting of the City Council was duly hold at 6:30 P.M.,
Monday, July 8, 1985, in the City Council Chambers. The special
meeting was called by Mayor Grimsmo for the express purpose of
discussing goals and objectives for the 1986 Budget. Members
present were Arve A. Grimsmo, Bill Fair, Fran Fair, Jack Maxwell,
and Dan Blonigen. Members Absent: None. Also in attendance
was City Administrator Eidem.
Mayor Grimsmo opened the discussion indicating that it is the
City Council's role to establish policy guidelines within which
the staff can create an operating budget. He stressed that he
would like the discussion to remain relatively general in scope
and policy. He stressed that he did not want to see the meeting
got bogged down with discussion over particular expenditures
at thio time. He went on to note that there would be additional
budget meetings in the future as the budget took final form.
Mayor Grimsmo opened hie comments referring to several years
ago when the sower and water enterprise funds operated in the
deficit when based upon their own rates. He noted that the sower
and water rates had boon adjusted over the past couple of years
to got those funds up to paying for themselves. Councilmember
Bill Fair asked if the funds were currently paying for themselves.
Eidem responded that sower user chargee and revenues were covering
the coot of operations but that the water fund in 1984 wan about
$9,000.00 short. Grimsmo again stated hie position that he believes
that the antorpriao funds should be self oustaining and operate
without tax. Ito put the question to the other Council members
for their opinion. Councilmombor Blonigan stated that he felt
user charges and fund revenues should cover all operating costa
in the enterprise funds. Ito stated that to utilize ad valorem
tax would be inappropriate in the antorpriao fund. Fran Fair
also was in favor of user charges sustaining the operations of
the water and sower enterprise funds. CounciLmember Fran Fair
wont on to state that with respect to the 1986 Budget, she maintained
continued support for a certain amount to be levied in the capital
improvement revolving fund. She also stresaod that some projects
which seemed to be stalled bo completed in 1986, for example,
the ball fields, the downtown rehabilitation, and park expansion
and beautification. Couneilmomber Fair went on to say that money
should be budgeted to implement the early phases of the expanded
water project and to got City Hall computerised. Councilmombor
Maxwell agreed that certain projects which seam to be not moving
should be addressed early, and also supported the concept that
Quser
charges should totally cover enterprise funds.
Special Meeting Council Minutes - 718/85
Mayor Grimsmo said he wished to interject one other concern with
respect to budget. He indicated that he has long held that the
greatest asset of the City is the people it employs. He stated
that he would like to see the Council grant a larger slice of
the pie for personnel expenses in the upcoming years. He acknowledged
that Monticello is perhaps one of the better equipped cities
in the area; but over the last few years, in his estimation,
the Council has been lax on rewarding its personnel. Councilmember
Bill Fair said that he had no trouble with satisfactorily rewarding
employees, but felt that the City should rely on the results
of the comparable worth study currently underway and that perhaps
the City could achieve equity upon the completion of that study.
Couneilmember Blonigen responded to Arve's comments that City
salaries are considered a bit low. Blonigen stated that he feels
there is a duplication of duties and performance. He also stated
that he would like to hoar more from department heads in a direct
way. Mayor Grimsmo, and Couneilmembero Bill Fair and Fran Fair,
all indicated that they didn't see the necessity of having each
department head come to Council meetings to report on nuts and
bolts. They concurred that it is the department head's responsibility
to fully inform the Public Works Director, who will then carry
the message either to the Administrator or to the Council. Mayor
Grimsmo than turned the conversation back to the budget and policy
statement,
Administrator Eidem stated that the staff had already met to
discuss goals and policies for 1986 and that increases at boat
were proposed to be moderate. Eidam stated that his main concern
areas from the various loss of revenues being suffered by the
City. Eidem indicated that Monticello would receive zero increase
in local government aid. Ho also noted that there was substantial
movement afoot on the federal level to terminate Federal Revenue
Sharing. Eidem indicated that his goal was to hold the tax levy
at a zero percent increase oven though that may not reflect a
zero dollar increase. He stressed, however, that such a freeze
might be impossible in light of the various revenue cutbacks.
Mayor Grimamo responded that it might be somewhat unrealistic
to want to hold the tax levy at the current level and that ouch
efforts, while being desirable, could eventually result in a
major increase rather than alight incroaaaa each year. Eidom
responded that he new it an his rola to demonstrate sound fiscal
management and careful restraint in spending while preparing
the preliminary operating budget; and upon review of that preliminary
budget, it should be the Council, as policy makers, to make those
crucial decisions to increase and decrease in certain areas.
Eidom said that staff could establish a priority list for capital
improvements from which the Council could authorize additional
expenditures, but that 1t is difficult for staff to coma in with
` a long lint asking for zero money on an annual basis. Eidem
(►l stated that he thought the policy and the need had to be identified
-2-
Special Council Meeting Minutes - 7/8/85
;�. and recognized by the city Council; and consequently, the expenditure
would be authorized by the City Council.
i
11
Mayor Grimamo asked Eidem if he had a feel for the desires of
the City Council and had received the kind of direction he hoped
to get so that the budget preparation may got underway. Eidem
indicated he did. There being no further business, the meeting
was adjourned at 7:20 P.M.
4Thm.asVA. Eide
City Administrator
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
July 8, 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Arve A. Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Jack
Maxwell, Dan Blonigen.
Members Absent: None.
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of Minutes.
Motion by Blonigen, seconded by Maxwell, and carried unanimously
to approve the minutes of June 24, 1985.
4. Consideration of Authorizing the Repair of City Hall Roof.
Gary Anderson, City Building Inspector, made a presentation to
the City Council on the findings of the roof replacement oubeommittee.
He noted that the project had been postponed when the bids received
in April came in over $15,000.00 higher than the budgeted amount.
The roof replacement problem was sent back to the committee to
develop an alternative. Councilmember Blonigen and Anderson
broke the project down into six sections that related specifically
to material and labor. Each of the six separate parts of the
project were then quoted independently of one another. In such
an instance, the City would retain the status of general contractor
and work independently with each phase of the project to ensure
completion. Anderson noted that utilizing this mothod, the collective
bids totaled $26,953.00, down 59,207.00 from the low bid received
on April 11, 1985. Anderson atraosad that staff and committee
fool that the time to do the roof replacement is now. He than
reviewed the individual bids for each of the six sections
of the project and presented the Roof Committoo's recommendation
for award. He noted that the Committee rocommandod buying all
materials from Simonson Lumbar of Monticello, even though that
is the second high bid by 3114.25. It is the Commlttoo'e rocommondation
that the purchase be made within the community. The Committoo
recommended the acquisition of specific okyliteo from Fullerton
Lumbar, the local distributor of the rocommondod and approved
style of okylito, for a total expense of $1,030.00. The Committoo
recommended awarding the ohootmotal work for flashing to Grisfnow
Shootmotal of Monticello for the amount of $1,730.00. The Committee
recommended awarding the labor to Grog vstoch Construction for
a total project coot of 57,200.00 over that of the low bid of
George Poach in the amount of 57,168.00. Anderson stated the
Committoolo rationale for oolecting the second high bid wao based
on the projected hourly rate. Grog Votach Construction projectod
/% the hourly rate at $20.00 per hour versus tho Poach hourly rate
-3
Council Minutes - 7/8/85
� of $14.00 per hour- Dividing the total contract amount by the
hourly rate indica ted that Vetsch Construction would complete
the task in far less hours and was worthy of receiving the work
on those grounds. The Committee recommended the site clean up
be awarded to Marlin Caillier for the amount of $1,275.00. The
Committee recommended that all adjunct electric work be awarded
to Olson Electric of Monticello for the amount of $850.00. Anderson
stated that the Committee's recommendation, utilizing the second
low bidders in the material category and the labor category,
totaled $26,985.00, $146.25 over the pure low bid. He stated
that the Committee was of the opinion that there was sound rationale
for awarding the job to the second low bidders in the two aforementioned
categories and requested the Council's consideration. In closing
out. Anderson again stressed that the current proposal was $9,175.00
under the low bid received earlier in the spring, but the proposal
is $6,485.00 over the capital outlay expenditure authorized in
the 1985 Budget.
Councilmember Fair asked if he was familiar with the work of
the labor contractor. Gary indicated that he had not done formal
inspection within the community on their work, but he had reviewed
the projects they had done in other communities and finds their
work to be fully satisfactory. Mayor Grimsmo asked on the proposed
time frame. Andornan responded that a 30 -day maximum is allowed,
but the goal is to complete the entire project by August I.
Motion by 'Bill Fait, second by Dan Blonigen, and carried unanimously
to award the roof replacement in six independent agreements to
Simonson Lumber, Fullerton Lumber, Criefnow Shootmotal, Grog
Votech Construction, Marlin Caillior, and Olson Electric for
a total amount of $26,985.00.
5. Consideration of Developing a Proposal for Council/Management
Team Building Retreat.
Councilmembor Fran Fair opened the discussion by referring to
the seminar she and Bill Fair attended while at the League of
Minnesota Cities Annual Conference. She wanted to update the
Council and folt tho team building seminar was extremely worthwhile.
She wished to propose to the City Council that the Council and
management staff invootigato developing a 1 -day retreat proposal
which would involve a professional facilitator. The retreat
would be aimed at team building and goal and policy netting.
Fran cited sovoral instances of cities who were in attendance
at the League cominar who stated how vary planned they were with
the fact that they had done it. She noted that the key axprosood
by oevoral momboro of other city councils was to keep the ratroat
local, keep it open, and invite the press. She stressed that
ouch a retreat wa o not intended to be a secret meeting of the
City Council whore policy was determined, but rather the ability
to improve their interaction with one another.
-2-
9
Council Minutes - 7/8/85
Councilmember Bill Fair indicated that he, too, was very impressed
with the testimony on the success of these types of retreats.
He said he favored Monticello having such a retreat and that
it could conceivably result in the development of a long term
mission statement, which would help increase public awareness
and public involvement. Fran Fair stated that she acknowledged
prior to the workshop that churches and schools were doing leadership
retreats, and she wondered whether or not it wouldn't be good
for cities. She stated that the seminar helped her answer that
question, and she was impressed with the number of people who
were originally strongly opposed to such a concept and now,
having been through such a retreat, vera strongly in favor of
such a proposal. She requested the Council's consideration in
asking staff to research and develop the cost estimates for such
a retreat.
Mayor Crimsmo acknowledged that he appreciated Fran and Bill's
attendance at the League Conference and said he had always found
those conferences worthwhile and was further glad that they were
reporting back to the Council on their attendance. He asked
Council members Blonigen and Maxwell to respond to the issue
before he made his comments.
Councilmember Blonigon stated that he doesn't believe that workshops
Ican be very productive, and that he sees outside intervention
nas being somewhat like brainwashing. He stated that he thinks
staff are adequate and provide substantial expertise when dealing
with the typos of questions the Council has to deal with. Ile
noted that he thought it was inappropriate to have an outsider
tomo in and initiate now ways of the Council directing the City.
He said he now it as being a typo of interforonce.
Councilmombor Maxwell stated that he was not particularly familiar
with the concept of leadership retreats, but that he didn't foal
it was really needed at this time. lie atatod he thought the
City wan operating very wall and was unsure that ouch a retreat
woo essential.
Mayor Crimomo stated that when he first now the item on the agenda,
he had to ask himself the question, "Is it the thing for Monticello
to do;" not. "In it the thing for cities in general to dol" Iia
stated that he surveyed the activities of the pant couple of
years and now the hospital referendum pass by an overwhelming
margin, and the Fire Hall bond issue passing by 80%. He noted
that the now schools have boon built; and he remembered times
when the City couldn't accomplish any of this typo of development.
Iia stated that the evidence of public improvamanto and Industrial
locations makes it difficult to justify the need for team building.
In his ostimation, the City is operating extremely wall. He
stated that he thinks the staff interacts wall with one another
and with the Council; and that further, the Council interacts
and relates wall to one another. The Mayor want on to nay that
Council Minutes - 7/8/85
I.
he did not mean to sound overconfident or that the City has no
need for improvement, but he did not think the City needs to
become involved in the team building concept. Mayor Grimsmo
also noted that he was somewhat leery of going into planning
and development meetings without full public accessibility.
Councilmember Bill Fair stated that he would not argue that this
City is well run and works well together. He said that he sees
such a retreat more as being educational rather than corrective.
Mayor Grimsmo askod Administrator Eidem what needed to be done
at this point. Eidem stated that a directive from the City Council
to develop a fu11 proposal for a retreat was why this was on
the agenda. He noted that if the majority of the Council felt
that such a retreat would be beneficial, then they would develop
a full cost proposal for the conduct of such a retreat; but if
the majority of the Council did not favor such a retreat at this
time, staff time would simply not be invested. Eidem vent on
to note that he had talked with other administrators who had
used this tochnique and that one administrator In a vital community
much like Monticello viewed the retreat as preventative maintenance.
Eidem stated that a city often invests considerable time and
effort in proventative maintenance to keep a quality piece of
equipment running at peak efficiency and to postpone the eventual
deterioration o Y that equipment. He said that other administrators
frequently rofar to these retreats as the eamo type of maintenance
program, that thoy aro moat productive when everything is running
I�..
yr
woll rather than after relationships and operations have deteriorated
to a point that a maintenance program can't resolve the problems.
Councilmcmbor Bill Fair intarjactod that he thought such a retreat
would, indeed, loo valuable, for it would provide an opportunity
of staff and Council to sharo philosophies without having to
vote, make dociaions, or debate the issues with respect to right
and wrong. Courtcilmombor Blonigen says he thinks the City in
doing very wall and does not undaratand why we would need it.
Mayor Grimamo a:okad Councilmombar Maxwell whoro he stood on this
particular isouea, and Maxwell responded that at the prosent time
ho is against having such a ratreat. Councilmember Fran Fair
indicated that s ho appreciated the Council hearing her concerns,
but that she would not make a motion at this time. She asked
that the Council members keep an open mind to the concept and
hopefully, it will be discussed in the Futuro.
J. Citizen comment-
In
omment-
in a non-schodu 1od issue, the Mayor recognized Odoil Haratad
in the audience . Mr. Haratad indicated that he woo thinking
of buying some Mand from Maurice Hoglund that Sian coat of the
Bondhuz Corpora tion and south of Highway 75. Mr. Haratad indicated
ho was present to roquost that a sower and water feasibility
study be done. He was asked by the City Council whether or not
he had mado con tact with City staff on this typo of proposal,
and he indicatod only that ho had contacted Gary Anderson, who
said the Oita would be buildablo. There was a brief diacuaaion
-4-
Council Minutes - 7/8/85
�v on the zoning in the area, and Mr. Harstad indicated that his
desire was to build a possible office complex and gift shop.
The zoning in the area is I-1, Light Industry, and there was
some question as to whether or not it was a permitted use in
the area. Gary Anderson indicated that office warehouse, like
that proposed by Construction 5, would be permissible. The Mayor
asked Mr. Harstad if he understood that he would be financially
responsible for the cost of preparing a feasibility study even
if the job did not occur. Mr. Harstad said he understood that
and accepted it depending upon how expensive the cost could get.
Administrator Eidem cited the Meadow Oak feasibility study as
costing in excess of $5,000.00. Public Works Director, John
Simola, interjected that he felt City staff could assemble a
feasibility study that would give Mr. Harstad a general knowledge
of the financial obligation. Eidem indicated that there would
be additional questions with respect to zoning and the collector
street alignment. Without a motion but on consensus, the council
authorized City staff to prepare a general feasibility study
with Mr. Harstad paying for the labor and materials.
6. Informational Item - Request for Status Report on OAA Operations.
Mayor Grimsmo opened the conversation by indicating that he would
be glad to answer whatever questions he could with respect to
OAA Board operations, he being the City designated representative
to that Board. Councilmember Bill Fair asked if there had boon
a number of meetings to discuss potential annexation. Mayor
Grimamo indicated that only one meeting had been held with City
staff, Town Board Chair, County zoning Administrator, City Consulting
Engineer, and Consulting Planner. Mayor Grimamo indicated that
the result of the discussion was that an annexation study would
have to be done before any annexation would occur and that he
personally did not see a lot of annexation occurring based on
that discussion. Councilmomber Blonigon stated that he was concerned
about the City providing services and the eventual coot. He
stated that the residential development that is occurring in
the OAA is developing in such o manner that it could be financially
impossible to provide services when that becomes necessary.
He stated that he thinks the City should do what it has to do
immediately to take control of that area, whether it be annexation
or some other means.
Public Works Director, John Simolo, concurred with Blonigon'o
concern and stated that the problem identified by Blonigon was
further compounded since there seemed to be no apparent planning
or consistency in the placement of private utilities under current
development. Ho stated that unless the City somehow intervened,
when the area does become part of the City, we could be in big
trouble.
(� Administrator Eidom reported that ho had asked Dahlgren, Shordlow,
�; and Uban, the City's Planning Consultants, to prepare a cost
0-5
Council Minutes - 7/8/85
estimate for doing a thorough annexation study. He felt that
until the data was readily at hand, any discussion of annexation
with Town Board members would be fruitless since most comments
would be pure speculation. He did note, however, that it would
not be inappropriate to meet with the Town Board and OAA Board
with respect to development standards inside of the OAA. He
noted that residential and commercial development, in his estimation,
should be regulated by municipal standards, while the agricultural
provisions of the County Ordinance would be appropriate for that
kind of rural development.
Councilmember Fran Fair felt that it was essential that the City
initiate meetings with the Town Board to start discussing this
matter even without all of the hard data. Councilmember Blonigen
felt that the meetings might not be productive and that the City
should initiate actions to take control of the development in
the area immediately. Mayor Grimsmo asked if it would be appropriate
to invite the Town Board and OAA Board to attend a special City
Council meeting hold for the express purpose of discussing development
and annexation. It was suggested that this issue be brought
back at the next Council meeting after the staff has had an opportunity
to look at a timing framework. Councilmember Bill Fair said
he would be more comfortable seeing the action initiated immediately
and got on with the meetings. He suggested that their attendance
1- be requested at a special meeting to be hold in the near future.
By coneonoue, it was determined to hold a spacial meeting of
the City Council on Monday, August 5, 7:00 P.M., and that the
Town Board be invited to attend that mooting along with the County
Commissioner who serves on the OAA Board and the County Zoning
Administrator.
The Mayor asked if there were other concerns. There being none,
and all business being concluded, the mooting wail adjourned.
A/ -
Thomas A. Eidam
City Administrator
N
-6-
9
t Council Agenda - July 22, 1985
4. Consideration of a Proposal to do an Annexation Study (T. E.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
After the joint meeting of the Mayor, Town Board Chair, County
zoning Administrator, myself and Consulting Planners, I asked
Howard Dahlgren and John Uban to submit a cost estimate for doing
an annexation study. They have been compiling that cost estimate
since that meeting. I was assured in a phone call from John
Uban that the coat estimate report would be in my hands in time
to accompany the agenda supplement. As of this writing (Thursday
morning) I have not received that report and have no idea of
the cost involved. what I anticipate receiving is a detailed
accounting of the cost involved for doing the annexation study
and all of the detailed areas that will be studied under the
order. Presumably, if the study is ordered the results should
give clear and decisive evidence as to whether or not the City
should proceed with annexation or should withhold its activity
until a later date. The only real matter for discussion at this
time is whether or not to authorize the study, not whether or
not annexatilin is viable. The latter question in the one that
would be answered under the terms of the study.
Not having soon the cost estimate and study proposal, it is impossible
for me to respond or make recommendations. I hope to have the
study in my hands by Friday so that it can accompany your agenda
packet. If I do not have it on hand by than, I will attempt
to receive it by Monday so that a preliminary review can be done
by staff prior to the Council meeting. There aro no alternative
actions, staff recommendation or supporting data at this time,
except that when the report arrives and it has boon reviewed,
the alternative actions shall be to:
1. Authorize the study.
2. Amend the scope of study and authorize.
3. Do not authorize the study.
P.S. Friday, July 19. 1985, 8:40 a.m, i spoke with John Ubon.
The material will be hand delivered by John Badalich at
Monday night's Council meeting.
Council Agenda - July 22, 1985
5, Develojmment Plan for a Planned Unit Development -Applicant, John
Kornovich (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
Mr. Lionel Kull and/or Steve Upgren, partners in the proposed
new Planned Unit Development to be called West -Cello apartments,
are before you with their development stage of a Planned Unit
Development. Going through the review of the doveLopment stage
of a Planned Unit Development with City Staff, we noted a couple
of things that were not marked on the plans yet. The developers
at that time indicated they would not have enough time to get
back to Planning Commission members with the changes in final
form. City Staff suggested that they put in the notations in
penciled form, and than when it comes before you tonight at the
City Council meeting that it all be in final form, ready for tentative
approval. The final copies of the development plan have been
in for City Staff to review, and they have found them to be in
order. The two developers, Mr. Kull and Mr. Upgran, have boon
very cooperative with City Staff in addressing the concerns which
we have had and also the concerns which have come from consulting
engineering firm, OSM, and consulting planning firm, Dahlgren,
Shardlowand Uban, Inc. With everything in order, Council may
approve the davolopmen t stage as presented and also approve the
final stage of the Planned Unit Development so the hard sholl
copies can be recorded.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. To approve the development stage of a Planned Unit Development.
2. To deny the development stage of the Planned Unit Development.
3. To approve the development stago of a Planned Unit Development
within the conditions as attached by City Council and/or
City Staff.
4. If the development stage is approved, than approve the final
stage of a Planned Unit Development.
5. If a development stage is approved, than deny the final stage
of a Planned Unit Development.
-2-
Council Agenda - July 22, 1985
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff has spent a considerable amount of time with the owners
of the project, Mr. Upgren and Mr. Kull, and they have been very
cooperative in meeting all our requirements of a Planned Unit
Development. They have also adhered to a new landscaping plan
which we are proposing to adopt, but which has not been adopted
at this time. we would look at approval of the development stage
as presented and also final approval of the Planned Unit Development
in its final form.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
A copy of the final development plan.
Planning Commission Minutes
I
-1-
Pq
Y
Planning Commission Minutes - 7/9/85
4. Public Rearing - A Development Plan for a Planned Unit Development -
Applicant, John Kornovich.
Mr. Lionel Kull was present to propose the development stage
of the Planned Unit Development. Mr. Kull was present with architect,
Sid Williamson, to propose the development stage with the changes
as penciled in. Mr. Kull explained the penciled in changes came
about as the result of a meeting with City staff members Thomas
Eidem and Gary Anderson on Friday, July 5. Chair Jim Ridgeway
opened the meeting for input from the public. Before any input
from the public, he read a letter which was submitted from Mr.
Roger Pribyl, a resident in Kampa Estates. Mr. Pribyl's concerns
were addressed by Planning Commission members, staff, and developers.
Chair Ridgeway questioned staff members if they felt confident
that these penciled in changes would all be put onto the final
development stage plat. Zoning Administrator Anderson and City
Administrator Eidem answered that they felt very confident with
the developers that these would be incorporated onto the final
pian to be submitted prior to recording.
Motion by Richard Martie, seconded by Richard Carlson, to approve
the development stage of a Planned Unit Development with the
conditions as noted by Planning Commission members and City staff.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Dick Martio, seconded by Ed Schaffer, to approve the
final plat of the Planned Unit Development with the conditions
as attached by Planning Commission members and City staff. Motion
carried unanimously.
Council Agenda - July 22, 1985
Z6. Consideration of Furnace Replacement at the Monticello Library (J. S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
During the design process of the library the library building
committee requested that the heating system be of the heat pump
variety. Because of the lower cost the library building committee
selected the air to air electrically powered heat pump system.
Three ouch heat pump units were installed on the roof of the
library. Unit number one, at 46,500 BTU -a, heats and cools the
offices and children's section of the library. Unit number two,
at 56,500 BTU's, heats and cools the major section of the library.
Unit number three, at 31,500 BTU's, heats and cools only the
community room.
For the past several winters, ever since the library was completed
we have numerous problems with the heat pump systems. Major
problems appear to be with the largest unit, number two. While
the other units have given us some problems, unit number two
has failed to operate several times each winter. We have had
difficulty in finding expertise to work on and repair these heat
pump units. Between the Public Works Director and the Building
Inspector, we have been able to diagnose the problems but lack
the equipment to troubleshoot and repair effectively. McDowell
and Co. from St. Cloud has provided us with the best repair sorvica
on these units. Duo to the complex nature in numerous controls
on those units, thorn have been periods of times where it took
several weeks to obtain the parte.
These air to air hoot pump systems have serious disadvantages
in this climate. Ono is the decrease in the coefficient of performance
with a drop in outside temperature. The required work (par BTU
of haat to the space) increases as the heating load increases
and the hoot pump system hoe the smallest capoacity and the lowest
efficiency at peak load. It is impractical to select a heat
pump that will delivor the rated capacity at peak load as it
would only operate at a small fraction of its capacity during
the root of the hooting season. Those heat pumps have lose ghan
1/3 of their rated capacity with an outdoor temperature of 0
and the efficiency falls off rapidly with docroanoin tomparaturo.
When this decreased inefficiency is encountered in temperatures
below 0, inafficient electric resistance coils or auxiliary heat
located in the duct work aro turned on. Those strip heaters
incroaaa the operating cost and can present a control problem
when largo capacities are involved. To put it in simpler terms,
the heat pumps work the hardest when its impractical to use them,
and they break down under their peak load thereby leaving the
library without adequate heat or extremely costly electrical
resistance hoot.
1 -4-
Council Agenda July 22, 1985
Compounding this problem at the library is the fact that the
library electrical service is on a demand type of rate structure,
in that the City pays a penalty based upon the peak load over
any given 15 minute period for the whole month.
We have looked into the possibility of providing an economical
auxiliary heat systems to take over the major portion ofthe heat
load for the library during the coldest part of the year. Since
wood fired furnaces do not appear to be practical for the library's
use, the best available fuel to provide auxiliary heat would
be natural gas. Natural gas is available at curb side. It would
be simple to have North Central Public Service run gas into the
library building. There are basically two places to locate such
a furnace, one would be on the roof and the other would be in
the storage room. Having climbed on top of the library roof
at least two dozen times last winter in all types of weather,
I highly recommend installation of such a furnace in the storage
room. This is also the recommendation of at least one of the
suppliers or installers which we talked to. We have at this
time obtained one quote from a contractor on the cost and complete
installation of a high efficiency 175,000 BTU gas furnace in
the storage room. The only work to be performed by the City
would be the relocation of the existing slop oink in the storage
room. The coot given us was loss than $4,000.00. Current heating
' costs for the library over the past two years averaged approximately
$2,500.00 par year. Utilizing only the savings in energy would
take several yearn to pay for itself. However, if we include
the expected savings in maintenance costa both outside labor
and staff labor, the placement unit could be expected to pay
for iteelf sooner.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Authorize City otaff to obtain quotas from at least two suppliers
and installere of gas furnaces and make the changeover at
the library for a coat not to exceed $4,000.00.
2. Do nothing but to continuo preventative maintenance as much
an possible at the library and react to lose of haat problems
as they occur.
3. Look into an additional typo of heat source for tho library.
C. STAFF RE'COMMENDATIONS
It is the racommondation of the Public Works Director and the
Building Inspector that you authorize the staff to install the
auxiliary heating system in the library as outlined in alternative
number one, with the coot not to exceed S4,000.00
D. SUPPORTIND DATA
Graphs of the hooting system for the library an wall an electrical
uaago audit 1983 and 1984.
-5-
L'
MONTICELLO PUBLIC LIBRARY
ELECTRICAL USAGE AUDIT
1983 and 1984
-Note: Assumed Minimal Heating and/or Air Conditioning
For Comparison 1984 Heating Coate June '84-June'85
Dog Pound
5 644.00
Assumed
Estimated
Estimated
2 Year Ave.
Piro Hall
Lighting
Heating
Air Conditioning
Month
Billing
Coate
Costa
Costs
January
5 989.76
S 339.87
S 649.89
February
806.16
339.87
466.29
March
818.02
339.87
478.15
April
506.09
339.87
166.22
May-
339.87
339.87
-0-
-0-
June
381.62
339.87
S 41.75
July
435.80
339.87
95.93
August
446.73
339.87
126.86
September
473.08
339.87
133.21
October
395.62
339.87
55.75
November
485.92
339.87
146.05
December
877.45
339.87
537.58
w
36,976.12
$4,078.44
$2,499.93
S 397.75
-Note: Assumed Minimal Heating and/or Air Conditioning
For Comparison 1984 Heating Coate June '84-June'85
Dog Pound
5 644.00
Senior Citizen Center
722.00
City Hall
1,544.00+* $2,094.31
Piro Hall
2,283.00
Maintenance Building
2,319.00
WNTP Complex
14,066.00
loxcopt vehicle garage and
air motor)
**Note: Furnace at City Hall inoperative for a period of time. On emergency
electrical heat for some time.
C/11
0
.. tt
J
rjpp �)
t
ro
S d /
0o
za
a � .ii rt .. /t � •\ •• ry ?,� (till% .��
t
quo70
Y7.
?I V07
me
ve
j
IM �• ,((.• -i_ •}
4-1 } •�' Jat..'•� ♦ C/• tt . ' f y1D iris
go
lop �9
00
�•} �(.r�• `t Vii, tYYYYY �^'•,••.� i i 1 :i~• ' � .. 4 � t '_:
`���. '�� A;6"
f� n e,.�,'i .t� y �," r� ii it ,;r t ��t ♦i` ..ty �1♦' �{ y/.wt ;+ — ti'�••�. �C.'.} ��F�� .i. .av j it li t
-- i }}}fff t•."f'ty'Swi'a�jn.. .�«"ur: �.'"'t::. 1'....: �..\v
u ',1,:'j` rY�.,,,' t .4..t• �,.'.1 I i . .t.. .i .j1a: :',.� i ` ` } '' S.' `'
H�ba, T1H.tt •'(F:T*�.Gr"rT ice..+ �i. %f ♦; i �!t}'/ . ter.^), (fr,�•
Council Agenda - July 22, 1985
7. Consideration of Approving Cable Communications Budget.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
On June 5, 1985, the SWC4 approved its 1986 operating budget.
The revenue source of this budget is based on the initial contributions
of the cities and the 38 franchise fees that we will be receiving
from Rite Cable. As you recall, at a previous meeting the
City adopted the new joint powers agreement for the Commision.
with respect to the budget, the City, as an individual member,
does not have the option of approving or denying the budget;
that is Commision business. However, if the City Council is
opposed to the proposed budget, then the City may withdraw from
the Cable Commission. The budget reflects a very frugal operation
on the Commissionand as the City's Delegate to the Commission
I voted in favor of its adoption.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Approve the 1986 Budget for the SWC4.
2. Do not approve the 1986 budget, and pass a motion requesting
withdrawl from the Commision.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Since alternate 02 is not at all appealing, and because the budget
was carefully worked out by all of the Commiosionora, I recommend
the adoption of the 1986 budgot as presented.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
A copy of the budget expenditure report.
-6-
11
I
SHERBURNE/WRIGHT
COUNTY
CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
BUDGET - 1986
Revised May 5, 1985
Approved June 5, 1985
0
1986 Budqet
Administration (contracted)
$15,000.00
Office Supplies
200.00
General Supplies
300.00
Equipment
560.00
Professional Services -Legal
5,000.00
Telephone
3,990.00
Postage
300.00
Travel, Conf. Schools
3,200.00
Advertising
0
Printing and Publishing
200.00
Insurance
1,500.00
Rentals - Office
9
Dues and Memberships
1,500.00
Machinery
500.00
Audit
500.00
System Performance Evaluation
2,000.00
Unallocated Contingency
2,500.00
$37,250.00
0
GENERAL FUND -- JULY
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Int. Conf. of Bldg. Officials - Membership dues
Coolen Bro. Tree Service - Cutting of 3 trees
60.00
600.00
20781
20782
Holiday Stations Corp.- Refund of over payment on license
30.00
20783
W. H. Cates Const. - Replaced a check dated 10/28/82
1,696.20
20784
W. H. Cates Const. - Balance due on library const.
639.14
20785
Robert Krautbauer - Fill for fire hall
150.00
20786
U. S. Postmaster - Postage
440.00
20787
PERA - Ins. premiums - (reimb.)
18.00
20788
Internal Revenue Service - Payroll ded.
150.00
20789
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll W/H
160.04
20790
Corrow Sanitation - Garbage contract for June
5,831.50
20791
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
151.00
20792
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial at Library
172.92
20793
Mary Ramthun - Animal control expense
212.50
20794
Mrs. Joseph Johnson - Animal control expense
250.00
20795
Arve Crimsmo - Mayor salary
175.00
20796
Dan Blonigen - Council salary
125.00
20797
Mrs. Fran Fair - Council salary
125.00
20798
William Fair - Council salary
125.00
20799
Jack Maxwell - Council salary
125.00
20800
YMCA of Mpls. - Monthly contract payment
458.33
20801
James Preusse - Cleaning city hall
308.35
20802
MN.'State Treasurer - PERA W/H
1,439.58
20803
MN. State Treasurer - FICA W/H
2,763.86
20804
VOID
-0-
20805
Commissioner of Transportation - 2 Star City signs
675.00
20806
Commissioner of Revenue - State W/H
2,653.00
20807
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
149.00
20808
Monticello School Dist. - Annual Comm. Ed. Contribution
13,500.00
20809
Rick 2oilinger - Refund of Cond. Use appl. fee (withdrew)
75.00
20810
Northern States Power - Utilities
8,515.37
20811
North Central Public Service - Utilities
1,083.56
20812
Wright County State Bank - FWT -
2,160.00
20813
LoTour Const. Co. - Payment 01
49,251.58
20814
State Treasurer - Bldg. Code Div. - Surcharge - 2nd qtr.
1,753.38
20815
Monticello Fire Dept. - Wages thru 7/11/85
1,267.00
20816
United Parcel Service - Postage for film rental return
7.15
20817
Thomas Eidem - Mileage allowanco
300.00
20818
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
160.04
20819
Internal Revenue Service - Payroll ded.
150.00
20820
Jerry Hermes - Cleaning Library
172.92
20821
Braun Engineering - Eng. fees for St. Imp. projects
897.75
20822
Ranger Products - WWTP supplies
100.06
20823
Phillips Petro. - Cas for Water. Dept.
46.06
20824
Monticello 0. K. Hdwo. - Shovels and point
38.93
20825
Stokes Marine - Supplies for WWTP 6 Tree program
32.40
20826
-Northern States Power - Street light mtca.
94.00
20827
Omann Const. Co. - 6 tons gravel
129.54
20828
Seitz Hdwe. - Supplies for all Depto.
486.41
20829
Gordon Link - Gas
452.29
20830
HCH Const. Inc. - Sidewalk repair at West and of town
325.00
20831
Coast to Coast - Misc. supplies
333.52
20832
I
(�►i
National Bushing - Mist. supplies
429.82
20833
Bowman Barnes Dist. - Misc. supplies
146.90
20834
Patco Thomas Co. - Urathana spinner - St. Dept.
140.00
20835
Yonak Landfill - Load of garbage from Mtco. Bldg.
8.00
20836
N
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Millerbernd Mfg. Co. - Repair sections for manholes
180.00
20837
Sherburne County Equip. - 2 bulbs and handle - St. Dept.
13.28
20838
Maus Tire Service - Tire repair
40.00
20839
Harry's Auto Supply - All Depts. repairs
92.39
20840
AME Ready Mix - Sand for Park Dept.
209.50
20841
Midway Ind. Supply - Supplies for St. Dept.
103.20
20842
Marcie's Farm Service - Lawn seed
99.00
20843
Moon Motor Sales - Misc. supplies
88.05
20844
Simonson Lumber - Picnic tables supplies 6 Fire Dept. exp.
394.94
20845
Lindberg Dec. Center - Stain, etc. for Inf. Ctr. 6 City Hal
41.01
20846
Bergstrom's Lawn - 2 wheels for Park Dept.
108.10
20847
St. Cloud Appraisal - Sen. Cit. 6 Fire Hall appraisals
2,100.00
20848
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
1,037. 10
20849
St. Cloud Restaurant Supply - Library towels
15.99
20850
Davis Electronic Center - Repairs 6 batteries for Fire Dept
171.86
20851
Rockmount Research 6 Alloys - WWTP supplies
90.83
20852
Century Laboratories - Grass killer for Parks
144.25
20853
MN. Mayor's Assoc. - Dues for Mayor
10.00
20854
Int. Film Bureau. Inc. - Film rental for Public Wks.
149.15
20855
W. P. 6 R. S. Mars Co. - WWTP packing and seals
86.73
20856
Ltmitorque Corp. - Gear frame for WWTP
351.16
20857
Bentec Eng. Corp. - WWTP office supplies
339.25
20858
Power Production Piping - Boiler repair at WWTP
570.00
20859
American Scientific Products - Safety supplies for WWTP
190.30
20860
Environ. Protection Laboratories - Testing at WWTP
55.00
20861
First Bank Mpls. - Public fund charge
16.00
20862
AT 6 T Inf. Systems - Fire phone charges
3.77
20863
Olson 6 Sons Electric - St. lite, WWTP, City Hall, etc.
1,885.50
20864
Communication Auditors - Fire Dept. radio 6 antenna inst.
120.00
20865
Vance's Service Center - Fire Dept. gas
99.11
20866
SMA Const. - WWTP supplies
69.60
20867
Simplex Time Recorder - Repair clock at City Hall
213.60
20868
Biff's, Inc. - Latrine rental
90.63
20869
Monticello Printing - Printing for all Depts.
235.20
20870
The Plumbery - Copper and fittings
8.73
20871
Water Products - Meters and valves
346.37
20872
Audio Communications - Water Dept. 6 City Hall repairs
294.40
20873
Feedrite Controls - Hydro. acid
1,652.30
20874
Midwest -Chem Specialties - WWTP boiler treatment
558.00
20875
Marco Products - Copy paper
59.90
20876
OSM - Eng. fees 6 pump modifications at 6VTP
3,934.55
20877
Flicker' T. V. - Telephone pickup at WWTP
2.19
20878
Maus Foods - Supplies for all Depts.
175.99
26879
Fair's Carden Center - Replacement trees - Dutch elm
307.40
20880
Albinson - Transit for Mtc e. Dept.
614.16
20881
Central McGowan - Cyl. rental and supplies
24.74
20882
Curtin Matheson Scientific - Rubber top for WWTP
5.00
20883
E. F. Anderson - Playground equipment for Parks
4,683.49
20884
Tom Eidem - Travel expense to LMC annual conference
23.50
20885
National Life Ins. - Inc. premium - T. Eidem
100.00
20886
Gould Bros. - Fire truck repair - 1,116.37 6 '83 Chav,
1,139.74
20887
Wright County Treasurer - lat half R. E. taxes
967.50
20888
TKDA - Eng. fees on now Firs Hall
3,392.35
20889
Holmes 6 Graven - Legal services on Tax Increment Bonds
3,779.30
20890
Wright County Treasurer - Police contract for July
9.782.08
20891
Orkin Exterminating - WWTP treatment
106.00
20892
i
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
International Union 049 - Union dues
147.00
20893
Matt Theisen - Mileage expense to seminar
43.25
20894
Power Production Piping - Valve inst. at WWTP
273.18
20895
Seeley Plastic - Pipe and adapters for WWTP
38.87
20896
Monticello Times - Adv. and Pub.
581.55
20897
Chapin Publishing - Adv. for bids for seal coat job
70.72
20898
William Fair - Travel expense for seminar
29.50
20899
Watertown Paint 6 Repair - Mtce. on water tower
11,509.36
20900
Fyle's Backhoe - Demolition of Hass residence
4,150.00
20901
Stringer Business Systems - Copy machine repr. - Sen.
f. 78.00
20902
First Bank Mpls. - Interest on '85 G. 0. bonds
35,193.75
20903
Fidelity Bank and Trust - Int, on 71 G. 0. bonds
1,385.40
20904
First Trust Co. of St. Paul - Int. on tax increments
18,994.79
20905
Norwest Bank Mpls. - Payments on 76,77,19 6 81 bonds
134,146.15
20906
First Bank Mpls. - Interest on 75 b 83 G. 0. bonds
54,541.80
20907
First Bank St. Paul- Interest on 78 G. 0. bonds
14,186.25
20908
Wright County Parks Dept. - Lease fee for Montissippf
1.00
20909
Foster Franzen Agency - Balance on auto policy
2,563.00
20910
MN. State Treasurer - P.ERA W/H
1,452.20
20911
MN. State Treasurer - FICA W/H
2,710.10
20912
Thomas Eidem - Travel expense
10.84
20913
Janette Leerssen - Inf. Center salary
155.25
20914
Unitog Rental Service - Uniforms for June
153.60
20915
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
170.00
20916
Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins.
4,226.12
20917
Wright County State Bank - Purchase 4 month C. D.
300,000.00
20918
Gruys, Johnson - Computer fees for June
290.00
20919
Monticello Office Products - Misc. office supplies
230.02
20920
Mary Ramthun - Animal control expense
212.50
20921
Monticello Dep. Reg. 02 - Title transfer for '75 chev.
5.25
20922
Water Products - Meters
182.16
20923
Gary Anderson - Mileage expense
72.48
20924
State of MN. - MN. Bookstore - Subscription - Bldg./Plbp. 18.50
20925
Rick Wolfsteller - Mileage to conf. and seminar
48.00
20926
Diane Jacobson - Mileage - 1st 6 months of '85
23.50
20927
Marlene Hellman - Mileage -
30.50
20928
Payroll for June
28,774.97
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR JULY
$759,811.85
6
1
LIQUOR FUND
' DISBURSEMENTS FOR JULY - 1985
ArLINT
CHECK
NO.
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll w/h
20.00
11838
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H
163.68
11839
MN. State Treasurer - FICA W/H
279.74
11840
Commissioner of Revenue - State W/H
244.00
11841
Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor
185.90
11842
Griggs, Cooper b Co. - Liquor
1,796.35
11843
Twin City Wine Co. - Liquor
1,170.78
11844
Ed Phillips d Sons - Liquor
3,606.19
11845
City of Monticello - Reimburse General Fund for audit fee
1,350.00
11846
Wright County State Bank.- FWT
223.00
11847
North Central Public Service - Utilities
31.83
11848
Northern States Power - Utilities
614.25
11849
Twin City Wine - Liquor
3,328.05
11850
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
5,040.97
11851
Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor
11,656.51
11852
Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor
1,102.64
11853
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone for July
54.28
11854
Viking Coca Cola - Misc. mdse.
301.65
11855
Bernick's Pepsi Cola - Misc. mdse.
1,601.00
11856
Maus Foods - Store expense
21.36
11857
Monticello Office Products - Office supplies
24.01
11858
Seven Up Bottling - 141sc. mdse.
370.40
11859
Yonak Sanitation - Contract payment for July
91 .50
11860
Dahlheimer Dist. Co. - Beer
17.795.75
11861
Jude Candy 6 Tobacco - Misc. mdso.
641.14
11862
Crosslein Beverages - Beer and supplies
11,213.35
11863
Thorpe Dist. Co. - Beer
4,087.20
11864
Jemco - Adv. for Liquor Store at Silver Fox
125.00
11865
Frito Lay, Inc. - Misc. mdse.
97.05
11866
Service Sales Corp. - Store supplies
28.57
11867
Olson 6 Sons Electric - Pop machine 6 bathroom repairs
142.00
11868
Dick Beverage - Beer
2,677.65
11869
Liefort Trucking - Freight
376.16
11870
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll W/H
20.00
11871
Lovegren Ice - Ice purchase
180.00
11872
Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins.
364.91
11873
First Bank Mpls. - Liquor Store Rev. Bond interest payment
1,495.00
11874
Foster Franzen Agency - Additional premium
1,188.00
11875
MN. State Treasurer - FICA W/H
296.67
11876
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H
173.60
11877
Twin City Wine Co. - Wine purchase
1,064.83
11878
Gruys, Johnson 6 Assoc. - Computer fees for June
110.00
11879
Payroll for Juno 3,927 .07
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR JULY 119,262.04
Mayor:
FROM: Tom
Arvo Gnmsmo
City Council:
MONTICELLO.
MN 55362
Fren Fair
MEMO
Phone (612) 295-2711
Jack Maxwell
Meso 16121333.5739
for the express purpose of having a pre -budget process workshop.
Administrator:
TO:
Mayor and Council
session with respect to the preparation of the 1986 Budget. We
Finance Drawer.
Rick watstellor
Mayor:
FROM: Tom
Arvo Gnmsmo
City Council:
RE: Special Budget Meeting Monday Night
Dan 61=gen
Fren Fair
Kenneth Maus
Jack Maxwell
The Mayor has conceded to call a special meeting of the City Council
for the express purpose of having a pre -budget process workshop.
Administrator:
City management staff has already had a goals and policies work
Tom Edo.
session with respect to the preparation of the 1986 Budget. We
Finance Drawer.
Rick watstellor
discussed the possibility of having a work session for the Council
Public works;
and myself in 1984 to prepare for the 1985 Budget, but the session
Jonn Smola
was never conducted. Rathor, wo had a work session to go over
Planning a Zoning:
the preliminary budget to review proposed revenues and expenditures.
Gary Anderson
I do not wish to eliminate the preliminary budget revisor meeting,
but I would like to have a short work session to hoar from members
of the Council on what they hope their direction will be in 1986.
r -r
What I would like to derive from the meeting is a statement roforring
to general goals and policies that might cover a Tango of topics
as wide as taxes to service delivery in parka to capital improvement
planning policies. I sincerely hope we don't got involved in evaluating
the wisdom of a specific purchase vs. an alternate purchase. What
I'm trying to establish here is a statement of goals and policies,
a framework if you will, within which the City staff can begin
its ovorall budget preparation.
We do not anticipate the meeting taking more than ono hour; consequently,
we would like to hold the session in our conforenco room at 6:30,
Monday night, immodiatoly prior to the regular Council meeting.
If it is absolutely impossible for you to attend, please contact
me so that you and I might discuss what goals and objectives you
would like to seg conaiderod at the work session.
250 Cast Brooawsy
Routo a, Boy e3A
Monticello. MN 55362
•
CT7T OF NRrr1C01,0
'
VmthlyDuilding Department Report
y
PFMCIM end USES
Mmth of 'JUNE, 19 05
I.-t
PE7U-QrS ISSUEDTnIe�eur'--��
Thla Sen, M. Lh
ZLh
La:t Iaer
Moh -Y
nt
JUNE Leet Tenr
To Date
To Date
RfiIDF71TIAL
Ilumber .
9
7
12 55
79
Valuation 3159,030.00
f -452,360.00 g 190,238.00
$1,047,738.00
12,195,560.00
Fees
966.85
2,464.57 1,200.22
10,008.93
11,281.37
Surchergee
79.50
22fi.15 95.,,
914.09
1,09].55
-
OOHM 1CIAL
Number
3
2
5 21
IS
Valuatlon
728,000.00
619,800.00 60,200.00
779,395.00
.1,713,960.00
F:ee
7,776.88
2,2 10.10 535.20.
5,244.87
7,825.29
Surchergea
364.40
309.90 30.35
309.80
856.95
IN[A15TTUAI.
-
Number
2 4
Valu:tion
1,075,000.00
1,768,500.00
Feea
4,874.50
8,250.07
Surcharges
517.90
'884.65
PW EI)LIG
Ilumber
3
11
7 72
29
Fees
133.00
27,.00 194.00
1,094.00
1,019.00
Su
1.50
5.50 3.50
16.00
17.50
OT)4M
Ih-ber
I
t
1
Veluetlon
456,900.00
456,900.00
Fa ea
2.165.02
10.00
2,;85. 02
Surchargas
220.25
228.2!
TOTAL 110. PE;W 73
15
21
26 1 t 7
84
'
TOTAL VALUATION
607,830.00
I 1,529,060.00 1,785,430.00
4,395,637.00
1 4,766,420.00
TOTAL PEF9
4.476.73
.9
I 7,1415 6,010.00
24,687.8]
72,]10.621
MAL SUPCNAaCIS
445.40
I 769.00 647.19
2,204.54
I 7,700.25
arRRF7rr 1gyrI71
.--
rE1W1T IIATVRg
Number
- - Fy.>, - - - - thuaber Lg Date
MSS_ SIfQ'ItaGE. Val amnion Thin year yn_LU_ et
Single Family
{ g y�
B
t9
Dup1u
I
2
1
Ftnl ti-lamd ly
t
2,106. a zo4.m
1.569,
4oe, 490.00 3
1
Connerclel
1
,1,930.00 204.00
000.00 6
6
Indu ctrl el0
1
4
Ree. C4regee
2
124.40 6.95 I
13,900.00 9
I]
Si pie
0
O
Pudic Bulldiy.
1
2,105.02 2I0.25 I
456,900.00 1
2.
ALTOUTIOII CF1 W71LIR
Dual ling:
1234.00
15.10
30,260.00 17
22
Conenarcl el
1
700.40 35.90
51,000.00 9.103
Industrial
I
0
0
I
� rwwlmc
I
All types
11
274.00 5.50 129
77
. ACCE580PT OTIIUCTURLS
S..1ming Pool,
0
0
DecAe
0
0
1 Irl"ORAnr PCPMIT
0
0
1
OtNOLi TION
1I'��
I •
.
• 0
1
TOTALS
21'
7,141.95 769.00 111,729,060:00
64
113
I
INDIVIDUAL PUMIT ACTIVITY REPORT
. MONTH OF ..UNE , 198 5
85_772 .Eight Unit io—house INF Jsy Miller/148-167 Jerry liefert Dr. I 902.67 1 1
VDT PLAN REVIEW 92,927.411
I I
i i I 1
j
1 TOTAL REVENUE 97,911.75 1
I1
,(PFI
�_—
cFCc
I DESCRIPTION
NAME/LOCATION
VALUATION-_•
(PERMIT
SURC14ARGEIP
LUMBING
ISURCHARGF!
pURMIT
65-765
Attachad Garage
RGIRusaall AndersoN154 Iledman Lane
9 6,200.00
9 57.70
5 1.10
S
5 I
85-766
Ba -errant Remodol
ADI Jotui SAger/426 East Drosdwey
1,410.00
.14.10
.70
BS -767
Be seeent Ramodel
Mikkaleon/222 Marvin Elwood Rd.
1,410.00
14.10
.70
85-768
Naw rlre Station
IADICorrine
PB Clty of Monticallo/101 west 6th St.
456,900.00
1,124.25
228.25
46.00
.50
B5-769
2nd Phasa Conal[uctlon
MI1L Nur-Ing Homo/1104 East River St.
568,000.00
1,170.00
284.00
85-770
Nome Add ltlon
ADI Armin Dia_h/301 East 3rd St.
IC
22,400.00
154.90
11.20
20.00
.SO
BS -771
Convenlanca Store Add ltion
AC•Jama• Ref rlgaratlon/101 East Oakwood Pr. 91,800.00
288.40'
25.90
112.00
.50
85-772
E19ht 11 L 7ewnhow.a
MP: Jay Mlllar/148-162 Jerry Lle[art Or,
408,300.00
1,201.50
204.10
II)6.00
4.00
85-771
Mooll• Ilome Addition
IAD: Charles Lurtdqulat/LOt 2, Rl war Terrace
9,000.00
90.50
2.50
B5-774
Detached Garage
IRC; Kevin Stumpf/618 Nast 6th 8c.
7,700.00
66.70
].BS
I
TOTALS
51,529,060.00
4,344.55
1
9764.10
1274.00
35.50
PLAN REVIEW
I
B5-768
;New rlra Stetlon
IPB Clty of Monti a llo/501 Mast 6th St. 1
860.77
OS -769
2nd Phe as Conat ruc[lon
'C MBL Nursing tic—/1104 East River Bt.
760.00
85_772 .Eight Unit io—house INF Jsy Miller/148-167 Jerry liefert Dr. I 902.67 1 1
VDT PLAN REVIEW 92,927.411
I I
i i I 1
j
1 TOTAL REVENUE 97,911.75 1
I1