City Council Agenda Packet 09-24-1984AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
September 24, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve A. Grlmsmo
Council Members: Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Jack Maxwell, Dan Blonigen
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held September 10,
1984.
3. Citizens Comments/Po tit ions, Requests and Complaints.
Public Hearings
4. Public Heartng - 1985 budget.
Now Business
5. Rezoning Request to Rezone from I-1 to B-3, Applicant -
Burgor King Corporation.
6. Consideration of Preliminary Concept Approval of Plaza Partners
PUD, Applicants - Powers, Kjellberg.
7. Consideration of Installing Drain in Water Reservoir.
8. Consideration of Bills for the Month of September.
9. Adjourn.
C
1 MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
September 10, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Jack Maxwell,
Dan Blonigen.
Members Absent: None.
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of Minutes.
Motion was made by Maxwell, seconded by Blonigen, and unanimously
carried to approve the Minutes of the regular meeting held August 27,
1984, as presented.
4. Consideration of Adoption of an Ordinance Granting a Non-exclusive
Franchise to Rite Cable Company of Minnesota to Operate and
Maintain a Cable Communication System in the City.
Tha Joint Powers Commioaion consisting of members from nine
surrounding communities has recently selected and negotiated
with Rite Cable Company to provide a cable communication eystom
for the cities.
Tom Creighton, the Joint Commission -a Attorney, explained to
the Council the proposed Ordinance that would grant a non-exclusive
franchise to Rita Cable Company. Motion was made by Fair, seconded
by Maxwell, and unanimously carried to approve adoption of an
Ordinance granting a non-exclusive franchise to Rita Cable Company
of Minnesota. Soo Ordinance Amendment No. 141 .
S. Consideration of a Resolution Grantinq Final Approval to the
Sala of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds for Fulfillmont
Systamn, Inc.
Recently, all of the documents necessary for the issuance of
Industrial Revenue Bonds for Fulfillment Systema, Inc., have
boon completed by the City's Consulting Legal Advisor, Holmes
6 Graven. As a final atop, the City Council moot acknowledge
full acceptance of the entire financial arrangomonte organized
between Fulfillment Systema and their landing institution.
As a result, motion wan made by Maxwoll, seconded by Slonigen,
and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution 1984 140 authorizing
the ioouanco, oa1o, and dolivary of the $479,000.00 Commarcial
DovoI pmont Rovonuo Note for Fulfillment Syatemo, Inc.
-1-
Council Minutes - 9/10/84
6. Consideration of Making Final Payment on Project 482-2 (Meadow Oak)
c
Consulting City Engineer, John Badalich, had indicated prior
to the meeting that the contractor, Richard Knutson, Inc., on
the 82-2 Improvement Project had not yet had a chance to review
the final construction payment voucher.
AS a result, it was recommended by the Engineer that the final
payment approval be delayed until the next meeting to allow
the contractor adequate time to review the proposed final payment
amount.
7. Consideration of Bide on Sealing City Hall Roof and Exterior
Brick.
Over the pest few years, the City personnel have noticed increasing
problems with the exterior City Hall brick spalling and flaking
off. It was recommended by the Building Inspector that some
type of sealant should be applied to the exterior brick to prevent
moisture Prom entering the used brick.
In addition, the interior coiling docking along with the beams
have boon recommended for additional varnish and/or Dealer coats
to prevent the wood from separating.
Bide and quotes ware received from two area painting contractors
as follows:
Doran Painting
Interior Varnishing $2,500.00
Exterior Sealing of Bricks 42,760.00
with Thompson Water Seal
Lindberg Painting
Interior varnishing 82,984.60
Sealing of Exterior Brick $6,372.30
with Okon Latex Scalar
Although Mr. Lindberg's bid for exterior coaling of the bricks
appeared much higher than Doran Painting'o bid, it was noted
by some Council members and the Building Inspector that Mr.
Lindborg'a scalar product was of much higher quality than the
Thompson Water Seal. Additionally, the Council discussed the
time restraints the City is under to gat the brick sealant on
before the and of September and noted that Lindberg Painting
had a larger, crow for completing such work.
After considerable discussion on both the interior and exterior
portions of the bids, a motion was made by Maus, seconded by
Fair, and unanimously carried to accept the Lindberg Painting
1 proposal in the amount of $6,372.30 for coaling the exterior
brick on the City hall with a note that it should be completed
by the and of September, 1984.
-2- �i7�
Council Minutes - 9/10/86
Council members noted that since it is planned for major roof
repairs on City Hall in 1985, the varnishing of the ceiling
deck could be made as part of the new roof project next year.
Rick WolfstelleV
Assistant Administrator
Council Agenda - 9/24/84
4. Public Hearing - 1985 Budget. (T.E.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
This is the annual Budget Hearing for the 1985 Budget. In conjunction
with discussion of the overall Budget, we must address the proposed
use of Revenue Sharing funds in a general sense. That is to
say, we must indicate that we intend to spend "X" number of
dollars on Capital Outlay and "X" number of dollars in contributions
to Community Ed. We don't have to go through a specific detail
during the hearing of every piece of equipment that's going
to be proposed for purchase. The Preliminary Budget is being
typed and may, in fact, be included with your agenda packet.
At the conclusion of the hearing, I would request that, as in
the past, the City Council set a special meeting for Some morning
when the discussion of the Budget will be the only item on the
agenda. This basically would be the Budget Work Session. Because
the final adoption of the Budget and setting of the tax levy
is scheduled to occur on October 9, I would like to hold the
spacial meeting as soon as possible so that any changes, revisions,
additions, subtractions that might occur can be put into the
final document and ready for adoption on October 9. The changes
and preparation of the final document is mainly a production
matter concerning Karen and Successful operation of the copy
machine and binder. We have not in the past ever had anyone
attend a Budget hearing with any kind of question, and I have
no reason to believe we will have any public here at this time
either. I would hope that we would limit intra -Council Budget
discussion until the work session and that the only formal action
from the Council will be the setting of a special meeting.
Because this is a Special hearing, there are no alternative
actions.
Staff requests that a Special Budget Work Session be scheduled
for Some convenient morning time.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy Of the Preliminary Budget.
Council Agenda - 9/24/84
l 5. Rezoning Request to Rezone from I-1 to B-3, Applicant - Burger
King Corporation. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Burger King is proposing to have Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Lauring
Hillside Terrace Addition, rezoned from I-1 to B-3 to accommodate
their proposed new Burger King restaurant. In talking with
our Consulting Planning Firm, Howard Dahlgren 6 Associates,
and John Uban, Consulting Planner, Mr. Uban indicated that when
City zoning areas were set up that they usually ran on one side
of the street and that they didn't intersect through lots or
parts of lots in a block. He did, however, indicate that he
saw no problem with the rezoning of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Lauring
Hillside Terrace Addition, from I-1 to B-3 and that it is adjoining
a B-3 zone and is conducive with the type of business in the
B-3 Zone in this area. At the September 11, 1984, Monticello
Planning Commission meeting, there was no input from the public
in regard to Burger King's rezoning request. As of the writing
today of this supplement, September 20, 1984, we have received
no additional input from the public in regard to the rezoning
request.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the rezoning request to rezone Lots 1 and 2, Block 2,
Lauring Hillside Terrace Addition, from I-1 to B-3.
2. Deny the rezoning request to rezone Lots 1 and 2, Block 2,
Lauring Hillside Terrace Addition, from I-1 to 0-3.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request to rezone
Lots I and 2. Block 2, Louring Hillside Terrace Addition, from
I-1 to B-3. The rezoning is conducive with the Monticello Comprehensive
Plan. The proposed now business to be built on Lots 1 and 2
is very compatible with the adjoining businesses in the B-3 Zone.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the location of the proposed rezoning; Copy of the alto
plan of the proposed Burger King restaurant.
-2-
Tl
+tr
��.' J •"/�I
4 •' ' t +
fil
.(.,�• t�``��.+.! '7� j'1`1 ++j+ 'i,�1 � I. j( 1. /j •7,��t,/�•f1>,}/)
tjj�p��� � /' , ; -r• .1' ``stlj`:!�/'(,,,�/ j ff , ��,1��,-�[f/+?j'
071W ^` ,� (t '• �L���CttLj��JJJ ���++TTr ^ fu t'
' � • ' '�.. + �` i 'Ear, � ". � — -
HIGH
WAY QsLo �-�•�..., _ ,-
4�°vs4 ti to 13-3• N0. 84
Cf.00 Tat
`MOCe�ti jA9 C° x4.0,11 ,.Tk-L
..r, pt�A "j.
B° � mat.. •.- . "n.,r KK\i
r
W
�. .,. _«+:.,...... .....N COUNTY IIMY No
Council Agenda - 9/24/84
6. Consideration of Preliminary Concept Aeproval of Plaza Partners
PUD, Applicants - Powers, Kjellberg. (T.E.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Plaza Partners PUD is the proposal from Kent Kjellberg and Jim
Powers that last came before you with respect to the sale of
1 acre to Wendy's by a metes and bounds description. After
the conveyance of the acre parcel was allowed, the developers
began to put together some of the loose ends of their Concept
proposal in order to go back to the Planning Commission. After
considerable discussion, we allowed the Concept Plan, though
incomplete, to go back to the Planning Commission with the intent
that the Planning Commission could indicate to the developers
that they could have permission to pursue the Development Stage
of the Plan so long as they addressed certain deficiencies that
were highlighted. The Planning Commission did precisely that.
Essentially, the developers were given contingent approval and
told that they could proceed to the next phase of development.
Some of the contingencies contained in that approvai were based
solely on the notion that all deficiencies highlighted by staff
and consultants would be addressed in the final Concept Stage.
The main reason this was allowed was to prevent further delays
of the Development Stage. Technically, the preparation of the
Development Phase of aPUD should not even begin until the Concept
Plan has boon given total and final approval. I find this to
be unnecessary in most cases, and we certainly didn't require
ouch a waiting period in the Meadow Oak PUD. In my estimation,
the Concept Development, though quite incomplete, had taken
enough form that specific deficiencies could be Bighted and
could be addressed. Since they could be sighted, then the developer
should be able to enter the Development Stage and address the
deficiencies at both levels.
The Planning Commiosion consequently approved the Concept Plan
to be sent to the City Council provided that City staff prepare
a complete list of concerned areas and deficiencies. A second
motion also stipulated that the developers of this PUD should
not coma before the Planning Commiooion again until the Development
Stage is at total completion and hoe full and total approval
of City staff and City Consultants. They want on record explaining
to the developer that they will hoar no further requests with
respect to thio PUD until it is in its absolute final form.
Shortly after that Planning Commission meeting, City staff did
go over the entire Concept Plan an wall so the Development Stage
requirements in the Ordinance and prepared a detailed lint of
!Lama required to roach completion. That lint has boon given
to the developers.
-3-
Council Agenda - 9/24/84
The only activity required of the City Council at this time
is to give a conditional approval to the Concept in light of
the deficiency list that has been supplied. This will basically
tell the developers that their Concept is okay provided that
the list is met, and they may continue to invest in the development
of plane and specifications and building construction plans.
This motion would in no way give any kind of final approval
to this plat or allow recording or any other use.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Give conditional Concept approval thereby indicating to
the developers that they may proceed to the Development
Stage and work on the completion of the Concept concurrent
with the completion of the Development Stage.
2. Do not give Concept approval - this basically sends the
developers back to the Planning Commission for Concept approval
in its final form and that the Development Stage proposals
will not be considered until the following meeting. This
basically generates a delay of approximately one month to
six weeks, which is probably not a problem to other construction
but is of concern to Wendy's. Wendy's is concerned that
they have appropriate access to their facility whether or
not the PUD is successful.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Council grant conditional approval to the
Concept Plan. After extensive review with Jim Powers, we have
highlighted a number of our concerns and cited ovary one of
those in the list of deficiencies. They ars fully aware that
formal final approval will not be granted until the entire deficiency
chock list hoe boon addressed. I do not, however, see any difficulty
with allowing them to proceed with the more technical phone
of the design. Granting the conditional approval of the Concept
at thin timo will allow them to do the development design concurrently
with the completion of the Concept Stage.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the Planning Commission Minutes; Copy of the plat as
last presented; Copy of the deficiency lint.
-4-
Planning Commission Minutes - 9/11/84
7. Public Hearing - Concept Plan and Preliminary Plan for Proposed
Planned Unit Development - Applicants, Jim Powers and Kent Kjellberq.
Jim Powers was present with his Registered Land Surveyor. Dennis
Taylor of Taylor Land Surveyors, and also Mr. Lee Nelson, representative
from Wendy's Family Restaurant Corporation. Planning Comiesion
Chairman, Jim Ridgeway, questioned Zoning Administrator Anderson
if everything was in order for the Concept Plan as presented.
Zoning Administrator Anderson answered that there are certain
Items that are missing from the Concept Plan before them, those
being water and saver plane as presented need additional footage
added to the water and sever pipe in the newly constructed road
through the proposed Planned Unit Development; it would also
need additional pipe sire than the sire indicated; it would
also need cross sectional drawings of the manhole and the water
hydrants proposed in the water and sever construction; also
City staff had questions as to the 1 -foot outlet between the
newly platted Sandberg Road extension through the Planned Unit
Development and the next adjoining property owner, Monticello
Ford. Two other questions were rained on two other outlets,
those not having a building or building site allocated to those
proposed outlots for any proposed use of those outlets. Other
than that, City staff felt that all the items were addressed
in the Concept Site Plan submitted before them. Planning Commission
Chairman, Jim Ridgeway, along with the other Planning Commission
members present, Joyce Dowling, Richard Carlson,•and Don Cochran,
wore vary opposed to actually hearing the proposal for the Concept
Plan if overyth Ing waan't in place as needed per Concept Stage
of the Planned Unit Development. That is per the requirement
in a Planned Unit Development that everything has to be in order
before approval or denial by Planning Commission and the City
Council. Having an indication from Jim Powers' partner in the
proposed Planned Unit Development that everything would be in
order for this Planning Commission meeting from the last Planning
Commission meeting held on August 14, 1984, Jim Powers countered
that everything was in order except a few changes that Zoning
Administrator Anderson and City Administrator, Thomas Riders.
had found in a meeting with Mr. Powers at 11:10 A.M., Tuesday,
September 11, 1984. Mr. Powers indicated that there are three
different firms that are involved with the Planned Unit Development,
each of them specialists In different fields of development
as so indicated on there. They had recoivod promisee that they
would be to City staff by Thursday. September 6, at the latest and
then only received portions of them Friday. September 7,
and portions Monday. September 10, and the final portion Tuesday,
September it. Planning Commission Chairman, Jim Ridgeway, reiterated
that that is a developers problem, not a City staff or Planning
Commission problem and that, as a partner in the proposed development
of the Planned Unit Development, it is his responsibility to
coordinate between him and the people doing the work for him
so it does arrive to City staff, Consulting Engineering, and
Consulting Planning Firm on time for their review. Zoning Administrator
Andereon indicated to Planning Comuisalon members that City
staff is recommending to Planning Commisalon members their approval
of the Concept Stage of the Planned Unit Dovelopment with the
conditions or revisions as mentioned earlier and that we foal
A3
the Concept Plan stages of it are intact and of good design
with the few exceptions that we have noted earlier. Commission
members reiterated to the partner in the proposed Planned Unit
Development that they will not look at any future development
stages of the proposed Planned Unit Development until everything
is in order, has been reviewed by City staff, Consulting Engineer,
and Consulting Planning Pirm and is recommended to them for
their approval.
Motion by Don Cochran, seconded by Jcjyce Dowling, to approve
the Concept Stage of the proposed Planned Unit Development,
Plaza Partners, with the condition that all revisions of the
City staff, Consulting Engineer, and the Consulting Planner
be addressed in the Concept Stege of the Planned Unit Development.
Motion carried unanimously. Also, as a directive motion, motion
by Don Cochran, seconded by Joyce Dowling, that the Planning
Commission members as a Planning Commission body, direct
City staff to work with the developers of the Planned Unit Development,
Jim Powers and Kent Kjellberg, to inform them in writing and
with their presence, any items that are needed before submitting
the next Otago of the Planned Unit Developmont, that being the
Development Stage. Motion carried unanimously.
_g.
s 413
/ I L0•9"C.M't LIMIT
LAMVN. PR AFCA i Wo!,CAF : •+tCA y
LOT 2
BLOCK 3
f
{ ' ,f 4FXE AF.tA i
y U. rt• n t
OUTLOT O 1 < t
r • , I �.A,r � � t , 6i7u1t�Y.'.. , '• . � L A�•'' • ' '111 .!
:AfACC - J 1
' rr zl � !�� .... .'•,1.' ,s'ti;At ,.•4MV ..1 <�1T �1 •
"q r 3 t• • _ yy 24' y .4( t r•
• "" "` � B40CK�
M «• � Nw
43S w i•v:Si.•+i'li+ltAJ, ' i \�.�4ArtG•,�► .+AVr.y /
. �= ,. � ut '"''.' �,i. �,�� '•fir .
i---..»�. { t! L�NIi . �tiY�v �.. r p9 L' l
t �" _ ._ ._..: - - —, �. AY1,L•Fd is •jrJ �..at".L ial/
1
PK .ARLI • � .,v{ _.., w� v'?,,.,' --. i.. .. ,f � _ . _ -� �,_ !, +' n "j- Y-...-_'— t1=- .
-i"2i? `. ►". •.�. - 3v" t9 `16C
CK'
A s;owcti �ty:�. ,�, ;iji•.jl:i t':' e'), { ♦ _ ti 'a,,rt :`' c
'•i r L5o0 ani iT" An
faiti:/�,,/.: :�_. i :{ A' :I�1+''.\ : Y' I
1 9TON •5 _ •.i=,�' f�;;� r� t�aNDOt!'R'' :,' .'r ,; �dIP�'
::fiWliWiD ti2i7. t�%'.t:' „�.; ,:_�•', ,}-r111�'� - - _ •::r /}t ��Syt
ttAs+.f• a%: ut; , i � �—c . CURP.i•�t 1i! C r!��'
,� a,�c•.c-.11.�...t /7!' + x:,•, •-�{,. -• ,{ t�j_c
r: y' 'a• ...1 .r - .•.•, i �q *� � ;1 ! �;
+`'GOiG"� r� *`! F'192.1
s ;OUTLOT A'• ;; `.
d' �t tT �)�{ _ ,1 Fi•1 `1 CNi 1# Ij Y +r E 1 (' +'�sJ.� ? lY•1 - ,-tir � �;: i r,ry �{ ''I t �} 1�' ;� ,�, ,tr `ti.' ' ?� J jl. I
17, • `' , a r :vwaic.;vc. ,: r rf' Ali
t
I
7
-
�t7 �• ^,y' a • 4 t' - ,i s _�. 1i7t1, �!' { ..} E 1 „�7 �, f: S �i /p. EtI{moi • ,�`' ,. l' % ./ .,. is
t ••t1 !i' III n; ,�� _ �
f .. -r, `.�. �. �: .;t•!_tiT�tet-Vi7:U ;;rttVf�".�'--�"T. 'T' R � � �~ � �� . :r f� 'rr' , • - i
t
j 34., th_ ,.r. - . JG.` �, �u;.:.�• , � � `'ice J , � •�, ,i, i . 1 1.1 ` .. `., r�yn' y . �'Y�, - .:f
.,r
n t !
t
c ' _ oUTLot 6Ar
is � 1 r t � ` � � � ``,i!- '_ •-'. i '
167
m r i "` a � .� i �; . ' ''r ', �aall�li'' _ -'►°k., .�: �;:, ;�• I I
.# i ri" 1 1 1 O � i i ���ri � _ � � <' #�y_ i „- r,, \ .,_ t 4� % •' siR � �
1 •r 1 r t• i , •c.
CAMC;4Y•itJFkIf
K'
>O - `'j itM txaUiK ' iCriG.t:JW! .. ... `� ttilid�r' �5 - i' t s y 41"
�.. 'a
�
{ - r` . +'
+ � :�:r�� -, :,c•.:.-k...:.� `•'.-..`�v j:iii.�:a CC}}„� - ,{ „dam;.
Jil
'i � :, \''• _7 , �j, , .I �a�,ji .. •- .. ?� 1LiSVP[ "[�• �J(�r' •y j' •Ii I'
' t _� 3 .'�+�,,'; ... L�`+' � it R r. "J 6. ,;• ,,;�;' �/
(/`��,+rFl�`yl�,.-+ �; a Oa�:.a:. ,i. '9iY .� ,�., S �`/fit: i'���1•'�:i' \�,+...�.' � .1'T !�S li^l' •�1 ,,f . ? I
lU�. S .a +'• :'t �S r.. ! {( i'vv�d.r ,7'IGt4�.i•1.iS.74.w.i 1 !sit f ,of �,. t / .�y� ..
.I/IY� i, tyt`•r� i'rOl'S i �,, i«..,a,q t ."' V(_ ( .!
�t .�/ �1: �.,�/Jli 'fp'w; Cl:vaaI * '• �1; � �t (��! ��� t I � I�t
.':..= t..• . ♦fit t i" �+• t. s'v�,♦ .s e.tMyft.s.+ .:y •.�, 1•', ...s' �M. ; ' t : , �, 1
� ••..�, �t n18,"'°S►t +wt.'s � �' t f .
10
. y
i
r: r
f:
ITEMS REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION OF
CONCEPT PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE
1. Cite the proposed uses for Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlet D.
Also designate as Outlot E (?) the leg on the south lying
oast of the proposed City street and cito a proposed use
for this land. (A list of proposed limitations drafted by
the City is attached at the end of this punch list.)
❑ 2. On the plat map, must show Outlet 0 lot lines cutting across
the access to the now street (between Lot 3, Block 3, and
Lot I, Block 2). Also, show lot line of Outlot B at the
access to Oakwood Drive.
3. Provide an explanation for what occurs in the rectangular area
lying southwest of the Health Club but lying outside of
those lines designated as "landscape limit".
4. Must eliminate any private land lying between the proposed
public street and the oast property line, except in
the far south whore the street needs to turn westerly to
join Sandberg Road.
5. In the rendering of the proposed City street, show
total width of City right-of-way, and Within that right -of -ray
show how much will be developed as actual usable City street.
❑ 6. On the drawings submitted to date, need to add the
Invert elevations and the water lino location that currently
exist in Sandberg Road. Bower is properly shown but Invert
elevations and water line have boon omitted.
❑ 7. A written operations and maintenance program must be
developed for all common open space, including Outlets. landscape
areas, and parking lots. This should address moving, litter
clean up, onow plowing. Water and sower failure, parking
lots striping, aoalcoating, patching, curb repair,
and any other maintenance tacks that will be required
in a joint operation.
a B. Mint show a utility casement along the private entrance
running oast and vast in front of 'the Health Club and
restaurant indicating City access to water shut -offs.
9. In a grid chart
placed right on the Concept Plan rendering
chow the
following:
a.
Square
foot devoted to parking'
b.
Square
foot devoted to other open space
c.
d.
Square
Square
foot devoted to stroot•
foot devoted to commercial use
(on the drawing that you have already submitted,
The following information is required for the Development
Stage of the PUD. We have prepared this checklist with
the intention that by completing the itema listed above
an wall as the following, your proposal will be virtually
ready for final approval. There may be some minor alterations
or adjustments that would be required, but we are providing
this in the hopes that you can complete the Concept Stage
and the Development Stage concurrently. That explains why
we are requesting substantially more detail than would ordinarily
be required in just a Concept Plan. The following items
should be addressed by professional anginoera since they
will be reviewed by City Engineers and in soma canon will
be submitted to State agencies for approval.
-2-
J
!'J
the square foot shown inside of the building
and indicating the activity already addresses
a separate question and should remain on the
drawing.)
e. Total number of parking spaces
10.
Foreach development activity that occurs there should
be a statement addressing the proposed phasing, including
ouch items as proposed opening of facility, etc. Be
sure to include a statement about Lot 1, Block 1, and
Outlet D.
11.
Concept Map and Plat Map must show 6 -foot and 12 -foot
easements in their appropriate places around the perimeters
of all Iota.
12.
Must Include a statement that the plat with all covenants
and restrictions ae stated will be recorded as stated.
13.
Each lot should show its mailing address numbering
system.
❑
10.
Per each building proposed there should be preliminary
architectural drawing$ which include the use proposed,
a floor plan, elevations, and a description of the
exterior wall finish.
IS.
In Outlet C. please address either relocation further
to the east or a reduction in the number of parking
spaces on the west to accommodate major truck turn-arounds.
Also, address whether or not an access out of this
parking lot needs to be designated into Outlet D for
future through traffic.
16.
Entire proposal should be drawn on a plat suitable
for recording.
The following information is required for the Development
Stage of the PUD. We have prepared this checklist with
the intention that by completing the itema listed above
an wall as the following, your proposal will be virtually
ready for final approval. There may be some minor alterations
or adjustments that would be required, but we are providing
this in the hopes that you can complete the Concept Stage
and the Development Stage concurrently. That explains why
we are requesting substantially more detail than would ordinarily
be required in just a Concept Plan. The following items
should be addressed by professional anginoera since they
will be reviewed by City Engineers and in soma canon will
be submitted to State agencies for approval.
-2-
J
!'J
❑
I .
Must enclose a detailed grading plan showing drainage
routes for the total project, not just one construction
phase. Drainage and grading plan must be designed for
when the entire 12 acres has reached its total development
so that we can become aware of the and result. This
plan should include storm sewer provisions and street
construction including detailed plane and specifications,
design calculations, outfall lines, etc.
❑
2.
The plane for sewer and water supplied were incomplete,
i.e., they ware missing spec's ouch as class of pipe,
detail sections.
F]3.
water main must be sized at 10 -inch and must be extended
to Oakwood Drive. Drawings must show a water stub into
Outlot D.
4.
Plans should be included to put in a stub both easterly
and westerly off the water main and both easterly and
westerly off the sewer main out in Oakwood Drive.
D
5.
The 6 -inch line indicated on the private property which
is deadended, apparently does not most with Minnesota
Health Department requirements. Please make necessary
adjustment.
6.
Eliminato elcan-out at the and of the sewer lino on
private property and replace with a menh03o.
7.
Hydrants and hydrant leads should be located so an to
not interfere with Gower lino construction and repair.
S.
Hydrant shown near manhole 17-10-C on the Utilities
Y1an should be relocated to the r.orth to the intersoction
of the private drive and the now proposed public street
as it in shown on the Concept Plan drawing. That hydrant
should be situated 0 feet behind the curb.
9.
we recommend that the private sewer and water lines
which and near the motel should be extended northerly
and service linos put in to Lot 1, Block I. so that
no construction, reconstruction will be required at
a later data to supply this lot with servieas.
10.
with respect to the public street, the extension of
Sandberg Road must be identical in design to existing
Sandberg Road as constructed in Sandberg South.
11.
Both on the private drive access and tho.Oakwood Drive
access, the turning radii must be designed to be 30 feet.
a12.
Curbing on the extension of Sandberg Road must be 8-610 design.
-3-
D 17. You must submit erosion control.plans in sufficient
dateil addressing both construction and post construction
erosion problems.
14. Submit,a sign plan for all signs for all businesses
proposed within the development.
15. A landscape plan should be submitted, said plan to address
some of the landscaping detail for those areae designated
as landscaped areas.
16. Lastly, should there be any substantial changes that
occur in your design, between the Concept and the Development
or Final Stages, a written statement of those changes
should be submitted immediately.
Because ,there are no proposals for the development of Lot 1,
Block 1, City staff has prepared a list of development limitations
for that lot taken from the.City Ordinance. Any of the following
uses may be allowed as a Conditional Use on Lot 1 or Block 1.
As a Conditional Use, of course, certain, specific conditions
may be attached at the time of permit application. This
list of land use limitations will have to be prepared in
recordable form and recorded as covenants/limitations on
the property.
1. An extension or expansion of any of the ,existing or proposed
facilities already designated for the PUD.
Z. Multiple family dwellings, either for rent or for individual
ownership, but in no case will the number exceed nix
individual dwelling units.
]. Barber shop, beauty shop.
a. Convenience store, but not a supermarket and not a store
which has gas pumps.
5. Laundromat, self-service washing and drying but not a
commercial laundry or dry-cleaning plant.
6. Professional and/or commercial office space including
doctors, lawyers, dentists, chiropractors, optometrists,
accountants, ate. This building can also be similar
to the Metcalf and Larson structure located in the downtown
which has multiple uses, soma of which are cervico oriented,
coma of which are retail salon.
7. Government and/or utility buildings.
8. Art supply store.
-a-
9.
Financial institutions, banks, savings and loans, credit
/
unions.
10.
Bicycle sales and service.
11.
Camera and camera supply store.
12.
Delicatessen.
13.
Drug store.
14.
Florist.
15.
Gift, novelty, antique store, but not an antique furniture
restoration and sales.
16.
Robby store.
17.
Restaurants, cafes, drive-ins.
18.
Private clubs and lodges serving food and beverage.
• 19.
Jewelry store.
20.
Books, office supplies, stationery.
l 21.
wearing apparel.
22.
Leather goods and luggage.
23.
Records/music store.
24.
Shoe store.
25.
Toy store.
26.
Travel bureau.
27.
Sporting goods, but not including live bait sales.
28.
Video sales and rental.
29.
Variety store.
30.
Pot store, but not a pat clinic or pot hospital.
31.
Radio and television appliance sales, but only with
minor incidental repair included.
As we have discussed, outlot D still preaants some problems.
It may be necessary before final completion to draft a list
-S-
C��
similar to the one above restricting the potential uses of
Outiot D and any potential replat of that parcel. As I have
mentioned to you, the difficulty with Outlet D is that it
is an unplanned section lying within what is supposed to
be a totally planned development. Any planning control that
is to be exercised at this time must necessarily be in a
restrictive sense, and I will attempt to arrive at an equitable
solution for both sides.
-6-
Council Agenda - 9/24/86
C7. Consideration of Installing Drain in Water Reservoir. O .S.)
C �
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The water reservoir located on Chelsea Road in the Industrial
Park is constructed without a drain line. In order to empty
the reservoir, all the water must be pumped into the main water
system. The Water Superintendent is concerned that we should
physically clean the reservoir itself. In order to do this
cleaning, we must get into the reservoir tank using high pressure
water and wash down the sides and bottom of the storage area.
After it is washed down, it is impossible to remove the slime
and dirty material without pumping them back into the water
system.
We have proposed to install a "T" and hydrant in the discharge
line for the water reservoir. We would close a valve to the
City water system and open the hydrant. We would then turn
on the appropriate pump in the reservoir and pump the slime
and dirty water out into the existing drainage ditch near the
reservoir.
We have estimated the cost of materials for the project at $1,700.00,
and the coat of labor to install the hydrant and valve at approximately
$600.00, or a total of $2,300.00.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Alternative 01 would be to construct the drain utilizing
a hydrant which will onablo the Water Superintendent to
clean out the reservoir utilizing City people.
2. Alternative 12 would be to not install the drain and hire
a profoseional company or organization to clean the reservoir
and contract for such services.
3. Alternative #3 would be to do nothing and leave the reservoir
as is.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the staff recommendation that we construct the drain utilizing
the hydrant as outlined in Altornativo 01 for an estimated coat
of $2,300.00. Wo have placed an amount into tho Budget for
tho installation of this drain of $2,000.00.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Nona.
-5-
Proposal Proposal Ne' _
FROM BRFNTWN CONSTRUCTION Sheet No.
Box 335 Do's'Da
Big lake, Minnesota 56309 9/24/84
2833100 a 441.1407
Proposal Submitted To Work To 6o Performed At
Name City of Monticello st,ee,_Montice.Uo oater_Re.aer_voir—
Street City__State_
City "'—Mont6ce7lo Date of Plan -
slot. Fla. 55362 Arcnite.
Telephone Number
We hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the completion of
ioi,,ta6ua• u,astsiAaAu y,.uvieea oy city for water valves
a,tu iayuranT ac sissy water reservoir
Fnr 3480 no
All material is guaranteed to be at specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the d,awings
and specifications submitted for above work and completed in o substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of
Dollars IS I.
with payments to be mode as follows:
Any oherotion or deviation from above specifications involving erno costs, -;It be e.eculed only upon .ninon orders, and will
become on e+tra charge over and above the animate, All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our
control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other neceuo,y insurance span above work. Workmen', Compensation and Public
Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by
Respectfully submitted
Par
Note — This proposal may be withdrown by us If not accepted within days
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
The above prices, specifications and conditions ora satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are outhorited to do the work as
specified. Payment will be mode as outlined above,
Accapt*A
Dote _,..
i
twee roes. a+so O
Signoture
slgnature
rc /Cec'e
�0 2
ofv , erf A; b ` ,
I
1984 -- GENERAL FUND - SEPTEMBER AMOUNT CHECK NC
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
25.00
19390
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
23.00
19391
Mrs. Margaret Gahr - Tree reimbursement
39.38
19392
Best western Inn - Marshall, MN. - M. Theisen seminar expense
88.29
19393
MN. Dept. of Econ. Security- Reimb. for double payment - Westpall
384.00
19394
J M Oil Co. - Gas
397.29
19395
Matt Theisen - Mileage for'seminar
81.25
19396
Corrow Sanitation - Contract
4,652.50
19397
Gary Vassar - Reimbursement for car damage on Lauring Lane
176.50
19398
Lindberg Decorating - Paint, etc. for pump house
145.48
19399
Mid Central Fire, Inc. - Hose for Fire Dept.
420.00
19400
OSM - Engineering fees for 82-2 Project
1,030.45
19401
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial services at Library
137.50
19402
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
125.04
19403
Gwen Bateman - Animal control - August
665.00
19404
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H
1,355.01
19405
Wright County State Bank - FWT
4,199.80
19406
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT
2,376.00
19407
State Treasurer - Social Sec. Cont. Fund
2,459.62
19408
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
84.00
19409
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
36.00
19410
Arve Grimsmo - Mayor ealary
175.00
19411
Dan Slonigcn - Council salary
125.00
19412
Mrs. Fran Fair - Council salary
125.00
19413
Ken Maus - Council salary
125.00
19414
Jack Maxwoll - Council salary
125.00
19415
James Proueso - Cleaning city hall
275.00
19416
YMCA of Mple. - Monthly contract payment
312.50
19417
R. C. Assoc. - Cleaning Supplies
101.25
19418
Janette Loarasen - Inf. Center salary
112.50
19419
Mrs. Lucy Andrews - Inf. Cantor salary
146.25
19420
State Agency Rev. Fund - Emp. Relations - Adm. fees
25.68
19421
Patty Cash - Reimb. patty cash fund
62.55
19422
City of Elk River - Seminar rag. fee
16.00
19423
Country Lumbar - Lumber
542.10
19424
Monticello Firs Dept. - Fireman wages
1,932.00
19425
Wright County State Bank - Investment purchases
160,065.69-
19426
Election judge wages - Primary election 6 training program
1.015.00
19427 --
MN. Stats Treasurer - Dep. Reg. foes
13.00
19443
MN. State Treasurer -,Dnp: Reg. fast
26.50
19444
Waste Management Board - Rag. Pas - John Simola
12.00
19445
N. S. Power - Utilities
8,845.01
19446
North Central Public Service - Gap
590.71
19447
Thomas Eidem - Car ,allowance - Sept.
300.00
19448
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
125.04
19449
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial services at library
137.50
19450
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H
1.322.10
19451
MN. State Treasurer - PICA W/H
2,405.00
19452
JAWS Precast, Inc. - Bondhus sewer connection supplies
430.00
19453
Layne MN. Co. - Parts and labor to switch well /2
995.08
19454
Earl F. Anderson - Signs - 12 handicap signs
168.83
19455
Neenah Foundry - Manholes
751.72
19456
Central Contractor's Supply - 3 jar puller - at. Dept.
61.53
19457
Century Laboratories - Supplies Mtcs. Bldg.
84.96
19458
Morrell Transfer - Freight
42.45
19459
SMA Construction - Blueprints - Pump house
7.50
19460
V
GENERAL FUND AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Rick Wolfsteller - Mileage
56.41
194"
Monticello Time - Adv. 6 legal publications
752.34
19,6
Midwest Computer Service - Minor equipment - WWTP
80.00
19463
Oxford Chemicals, Inc. - De -germ 6 lotion - WWTP
117.10
19464
Omann Construction - Street Dept. supplies
234.96
19465
American Scientific Products - Chemicals, etc. for WwrP
423.85
19466
Orkin Exterminating Co. - Pest control expense for WWPP
106.00
19467
Wright County Auditor - 1984 Assessment book
12.50
19468
Fire Instructor's Assn. of MN. - Manuals for Fire Dept.
114.50
19469
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone for August
962.42
19470
North Star Waterworks Products - Pipes, etc. for Bondhus Pro',.
1.72.20
19471
Goodin Co. - 10' air duct
31.71
19472
Electronic Center - WWTP supplies
102.42
19473
Davies Water Equip. - 10" PVC pipe
84.25
19474
Ranger Products - Nuts and bolts - WWTP
50.92
19475
Vessco, Inc. - 2 diaphragms - WWTP
233.84
19476
OSM - 90% payment due on 84-2 Imp. project
35,748.39
19477
Burlington Northern Railroad - 40' crossing at Cedar St.
2,869.17
19478
Holmes i Graven - Issuance of G. 0. bonds of '84
1,500.00
19479
Fair's Garden Center - Trees - Par West park
2,158.16
19480
Buffalo Bituminous - Patch for let Nat. Bank
2,200.00
19481
Braun Engineering - Soil testing
25.00
19482
0. K. Hardware - Calculator, battery, filter, glue - Mtco. B19g.
85.07
19483
Coast to Coast - Concrete mix, polyaheet, gloves, shovel, etc.
513.20
19484
Independent Lumber - Lumber, sand, otc. - Par West a parks
360.94
19485
Our Own Hardware - Misc. supplies for all Dept$.
444.35
1948a
National Bushing - Filters, anti -freeze, timing sot, battery
359.36
194
Phillips Petro. - Gas
62.96
19486
Mobil Oil - Gas
32.73
19489
Northwestern Dell - Fire phone charges
39.37
19490
Monticello Office Products - Library desk - 467.10
549.66
19491
First Bank - Mpls. - Public fund charges
12.00
19492
Gruys, Johnson - Computer charges - July
290.00
19493
Tom Eidem - Meals at meetings
9.94
19494
Audio Communications - Repairs for Fire Dept. i WWfP
324.40
19495
Marco Business Products - Mtco. agreement on machines
378.28
19496
Davis Electronic Service - Repairs for Fire Dept.
122.66
19497
Marlene Hellman - Dep. Reg. seminar fees
28.40
19498
Comfort Craft Co. - Repairs at City hall a Library
1,915.95
19499
Maus Foods - Dog food, coffee, trash bags, lawn bags, towels
241.80
19501
Banker's Life ins. - Group Ins.
4,025.44
19502
A T i T Information Systems - Firephons charges
3.59
19503
State Treasurer - Surplus Property Fund - Membership fee
30.00
19504
AHE Ready Mix - Concrete
132.08
19505
Road Machinery c Supplies - 8' plow for St. Dept.
1,583.84
19506
Dig Lake Lumber - Pole barn material
2,586.99
19507
Sentry Systems - Lease of telephone for water dept.
90.00
19508
Conway airs G Safety - Wrench for booster hose - Fire Dept.
45.00
19509
Central McGowan - Cylinder rental
2.48
19510
filen Franklin - Film, tape
19.52
19511
National Life Ins. - Life Ins. - Tom Eidem
100.00
19512
J M Oil Co. - Gas for equipment
1,790.50
19f
Hoglund Bus Co. - Hose - Shop
10.10
195. "
Monticello printing - Copies
6.05
19515
American Management Assoc. - Membership dues
125.OU
19516
Don Busch, Treasurer - Membership dues - Clerk 6 Fin. Assoc.
30.00
19517
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK Ni
Adam's Pest Control - Contract at Library
38.20
19518
Local 049 - Union dues
126.00
19519
AIN. Municipal Finance Officer's Assoc. - Reg. fee - seminar
75.00
19520
Safety-Kleen Corp - Supplies at Mtce. Bldg.
33.00
19521
Vance's Service Center - Gas - Fire Dept.
64.79
19522
Wright County Treasurer - 2nd.% taxes - Lindberg house
522.75
19523
Suburban Gas - Gas - Water Dept.
7.68
19524
Wright County Sheriff Dept. - Police contract services
9,494.38
19525
Moody's Investors Service - Municipal bond rating fee
1,000.00
19526
Feed-Rite Controls - 1000 Feed Rite 05
900.00
19527
Water Products - Maters and connections, etc.
2,782.72
19528
Parpart Truckline - Freight on motors from Water Products
25.54
19529
Harry's Auto Supply - Windshield wash, filter, screw, etc.
135.87
19530
Eull Concrete Products - Curbs i stops
176.40
19531
Scranton Gillette Communications - Sub. - J. Simcla
19.00
19532
American National Bank G Trust - '60 G. O. Bonds - P 6 I
23,627.50
19533
Construction Fastening Systems - Anchors - Bondhus Sewer
102.24
19534
The Forms Group, Inc. - Election supplies
89.75
19535
Diane Jacobson - Dep. Reg. seminar expense
22.95
19536
Anoka County Social Services - Payroll ded. foe
88.00
19537
Central Eyewear - Glasses for S. Hancock - Raimb.
43.45
19538
Gary Anderson - Mileage - September
71.52
19539
Unitog Rental Services - Uniform expanse
176.00
19540
Payroll for August
27,661.43
TOTAL GENERAL DISBURSEMENTS
$332,173.53
SEPTEMBER
LIQUOR Fm
Al
CHECK
LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS FOR SEPTEMBER - 1984
N0.
00.
Wright County State Bank - C. D. purchase
30,000.00
11373
Eagle wine Co. - Liquor
1,041.28
11374
Twin City Wine Co. - Liquor
1,344.68
11375
Ed Phillips - Liquor
4,208.43
11376
Quality Wino - Liquor
1,725.46
11377
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll dad.
20.00
11378
State Treasurer - Para
173.23
11379
Wright County State Bank - PWT - August
446.60
11380
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - August
238.00
11381
State Treasurer - Social Security Cont. Fund
287.67
11382
Twin City Wine - Liquor
990.30
11383
Eagle wine Co. Liquor
80.80
11384
Griggs, Cooper & Co. --Liquor
3,317,.85
11385
Northern States Power - utilities
755.22
11386
North Central Public Service - Gas
8.61
11387
Ed Phillips & Sons - Liquor
6,040.67
11388
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll dad.
20.00
11389
MN. State Treasurer - PERA
177.05
11390
State Treasurer - FICA W/H
294.02
11391
Wrlyht Cuunty State Bank - C. D. purchase
35.000.00
11392
Twin City Wine Co. - Liquor
1,476.57
11393
Commissioner of Revenue - Excise tax - August
8.190.72
11394
Bernick'• Pepsi Cola - Boor - mist. mdso.
3,982.70
11395
Grosslain Beverages - Beer & misc. mdse.
14,511.35
11396
Viking Coca Cola - Misc. mdse.
476.40
11397
Monticello Times - Adv.
60.00
11398
Quality Wine - Liquor
38.40
11399
Our Own Hardware - Wastebaskets
11.78
11400
NCR Corporation - Tapes & ribbons for cash register
249.11
11401
Olson & Sons Electric - Equipment maintenance & motor repair
100.44
11402
Dick Beverage - Beer & misc. mdse.
6,852.75
11403
Day Dist. Co. - Beer 4 misc. mdse.
832.95
11404
Yonak Sanituion - Garbage service
82.50
11405
Slifka Sales - Misc. mdse.
73.63
11406
Jemco - Adv.
SO.00
11407
Seven -Up Bottling - Misc. mdse.
366.00
11408
Dahlheimar Dist. - Beer & misc. mdse.
20,041.26
11409
Maus Foods - Store supplies
26.96
11410
Old Dutch Foods - Misc, mdse.
307.10
11411
Jude Candy & Tobacco - Misc. mdse.
905.13
11412
Liefert Trucking - Freight
536.23
11413
Lovegren Ice. - Ice purchase
382.05
11414
Coast to Coast - Bucket, naps, bulbs, etc.
28.09
11415
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
S1.37
11416
Gruys, Johnson - Computer charges for July
110.00
11417
Banker -s Life - Group Ins.
364.91
11418
Thorpe Dist. Co. - Beer & misc. mdse.
5,953.45
11419
Twin City Wine - Liquor
915.62
11420
S Payroll for August
3.723.82
TOTAL DISBURSBJIER" ron awT"na - 1934
9156,871.16
nr�
INDIVIDUAL PEP.MIT ACTIVITY REPORT
MONTH OF AUGUST , 1984
! TOTAL REVENUE 1,788.24
W
J
1
I
_
ERMIT
DESCRIPTION
P I
NAME/LOCATION
VALUATION
Frrt
UMBER
F
PERMIT
SURCHARGE
PLUMBING SURCHARGE
84-669
Detached Garage
RGI
Doug Miller/707 west 6th Street
57,200.00
$ 63.70
5 3.60
84-670
Reshingle House
AD
Dolly McLeod/212 Locust Street
1,200.00
14.30
.70
84-671
Reside House 6 Garage
AD
Russell Bell/718 West River Street
3,000.00
.38.50
1.50
84-672
Reshingle House G Garage
AD
Clifford Olson/519 East Broadway
1,200.00
14.30
.70
84-673
Reshingle House 6 Garage
AD
Roman Brauch/409 West Broadway
1,200.00
14.30
..70
84-674
1
Reside House G Garage
AD
Emil Kaufert/613 'lest River Street
3,929.00
44.07
1.96
84-675
Detached Accessory Garage
RG
Tom Moores/1216 Sandy Lane
3,600.00
40.00
1.80
84-676
Bund New walls G Roof
ACS
Jones Manufacturing/100 Locust Street
2,000.00
32.50
1.00
I
between Buildings
84-677
Reshingle House G Garage
AD
Myron Marquette/1025 west River Stree:
1,430.00
14.30
.70 ,
84-678
Single Family Dwelling
!SF:
Marvin George Builders/34 Fairway Dr.
-42,300.00
248.35
I
21.15
$23.00 S .50
84-680
Storage Building
IC I
Heroes lnvestments/108 Thomas Park Dr.
22,600.00
156.10
11.30 1
,
84-681
Reside House G Garage
ADI
Leo Mazer/18 Eagle Circle
7,500.00
65.50
3.75
84-682
Wendy's
C
Oxboro Development Co./120 Oakwood Dr.133,300.00
516.25
66.65
41.00 .50
84-683
Demolition Gila Service
(D
11
Tripp oil Co./300 west Broadway
10.00
i
.
•
TOTALS '230,459.00
1,272.17
115.51
64.00 1.00
j
i PLAN CHECKING
i
I
1
I
84-682
1' Wendy's
C
Oxboro Development Co./120 Oakwood Da.
335.56
-
I
I
�
1
I
,
I
1
! TOTAL REVENUE 1,788.24
W
J
CITY OF MONI'IC10.10
Monthly Building
Department Report
PERMITS and USES
Month of -August 1984
Lest
'Shia
•Same Month 'Last Year
'This Year j
PERMITS ISSUTiD
Month July
Month Auqust
Last Year To Date
To Date
RESIDENTIAL
Number
8
10
6 41
72 ;
Valuation
E 443,230.00
S 72,559.00
$193,275.00 $1,814,672.90
$2,321,227.00
Fees
2,419.21
557.32
1,042.09 8,425.03
12,817.11
Surcharges
221.70
36.56
96.64 908.44
1,151.20
00MME 1CIAL
-
Number
1
3
1 13
25
Valuation
3,100.00
157,900.00
3,687.40 1,082,212.40
940,329.00
Fees
39.10
1,040.41
42.60 5,047.71
6,324.36
Surcharges
1.55
78.95
1.84 540.99
470.30
INDUSTRIAL
Number
1
1 2
5 '
Valuation
8,000.00
90,000.00 590,000.00
1,776,500.00
Fees
68.50
664.95 1,862.40
8,318.53
Surcharges
4.00
45.00 295.00
- 888.65
PLUMBING
Number
4
2
4 22
37
232.00
64.00
94.00 693.00
1,367.00
�gees
- Surcharges
2.00
1.00
2.00 12.50
18.50
OTHERS
Number
1
1 9
I
2
Valuation
32,220.00
Fees
10.00
10.00 480.30
20.00
Surcharges
13.90
TOTAL N0. PERMITS
14
16
1387
141
TOTAL VAIUATIOM
454,330.00
230,459.00
286,962.40 3,529. 105. 30
5,038,056.00
TOTAL FEES
2,758.81
1,671.73
1,853.64 16,508.44
28,847.02
TOTAL SURCHARGES
229.25
116.51
145.48 1,770.83
2,528.65
CURRENT MONTH
__
'
plrtca
Number to Date
PERMIT NATURE
Number
PFRMqT
Wei= Valuation M This year Last yearl
Single Family
1
$ 248.35
$ 21.15 S 42,300.00 21
17
Duplex
1
1 I
Multi-family
2
3
Commercial
2
1,007.91
77.95 155,900.00 8
9
Industrial
4
1
Res. Garages
2
103.70
5.40 10,800.00 15
6
Signs
0
2
Public 8uildingo
2
0
ALTERATION OR REPAIR
Dwellings
7
205.27
10 .01 19,459.00! 33
10
Commercial
1
32.x0
1.00 2,000.00 15
4
Industrial
I
1
1
I
PI.UMBIIJG
All types
I
2
64.00
1.00 37
22
I ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
i Svimminq Poole
0
3
Docks
0
4
I TEMPORARY PERMIT
0
2
DEMOLITION
1
10.00
2
2
ITOTALS
16
$1,671.73
$116.51 5230,459.00 141
87