City Council Agenda Packet 10-22-1984AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
{� Monday, October 22, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve A. Grimsmo
Council Members: Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Jack Maxwell, Dan Blonigen
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held October 9,
1984, and the Special Meeting Held October 15, 1984.
3. Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests, and Complaints.
Public Hearings
4. Public Hearing - Consideration of Request to Vacate Utility
Easement - Applicant, Fulfillments Systems, Inc.
5. Public Hearing - Consideration of Request to Vacate Utility
Easement - Applicant, Burger King Corporation.
Ordinances
G. Consideration of Ordinance Amendment - Liquor Sales on Election
Days.
7. Consideration of Authorizing the Publication of a Summary
of the Cable Franchising Ordinance.
Old Business
S. Consideration of Giving Final Approval to the Concept Plan
and the Development Stage Plan for Plaza Partners, a Planned
Unit Development.
Now Business
9. Review of the Amended Comprehensive Plan and Consideration
of Adoption.
10. Consideration of Setting a Spacial Mooting to Canvass Election
Returns and Declare the Results of the Election.
11. Consideration of Billa for the Month of October.
12. Adjournment.
(1i
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
October 9, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Ken Maus, Jack Maxwell, Dan
Blonigen
Members Absent: Fran Fair
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of Minutes.
Motion was made by Blonigon, soconded by Maus, and unanimously
carried to approve the minutes of the regular meeting hold September 24,
1984.
3. Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests and Complaints.
Burger King Corporation presented a written petition roquesting
that the City of Monticello consider releasing the 12 -foot utility
easements located between Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Lauring Hillside
Addition, as indicated on the original plat of this subdivision.
Burger King is currently the owner of both iota and plena to
constructtheir new restaurant facility on the utility easements,
and the eaeemente would not be nocoaaary, as they would still
provide drainage and utility easements around the perimeter
of their entire property.
Fulfillment Systems, Inc., also had presented a written request
that the City also release utility and drainage easements on
their property in Lauring Ilillsids Terrace, so they also will
bo building over the lot linea and will still provide drainage
oasaments around the parimoter of their property.
Motion was made by Blonigon, seconded by Maus, and unanimously
carried to hold a public hearing at the next regular Council
mooting, October 22, 1984, to consider releasing the utilities
and drainage oaoemonto as roqusstod by Burger King and Fulfillment
Systema, Inc.
Tho Monticollo-Big Lako Community Hospital also requested that
the City hold a public hearing to consider vacating a portion
of the plattod,but undeveloped River Street behind the Hospital
between the 1000 and 1200 Block area. The Hoopital plane to
construct the Nursing Home behind the Hospital and would like
to build within the right-of-way of the present platted River
Street. The Hospital has Indicated they would be willing to
provldo the City with a now pormanent easement for the City's
Csever line that Is currently situated In River Street if the
vacation in approved.
-1 O
Council Minutes - 10/9/84
Motion was made by Maus, seconded by Blonigen, and unanimously
carried to hold a public hearing to consider vacating that portion
of River Street between the 1000 and 1200 Block area located
behind the Hospital for November 12, 1984.
4. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the 1985 Budget and Setting
the Tax Levy.
After a work session was held by City Council with staff members,
the proposed 1985 Tax Levy was set at $1,363,975.00.
Mr. Don Cochran, Chairman of the HRA Committee, appeared before
the Council to request that an additional $30,000.00 be added
to the Tax Levy for 1985 for the HRA Committee operations.
Mr. Cochran felt that the additional funds would provide the
HRA with a little bit of working capital which could be used
if an unexpected need arose.
After reviewing the request, motion was made by Maxwell, seconded
by Maus, and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution 1984 041
adopting the 1985 Budget and setting the Tax Levy at $1,393,975.00.
5. Consideration of Installing a Drain in Water Reservoir.
r! John Simola, Public Works Director, informed the Council that
Jd1 in hie opinion the City should consider installing a drain in
the water reservoir for cleaning purposes. In hie discussions
with the City Engineer, it was determined that the installation
of a drain would sufficiently drain the water reservoir to allow
for the cleaning periodically of the interior walla to remove
deposits that have accumulated.
Questions were raised by the Council an to whether it would
be more economical to hire a contractor to clean the reservoir
every five years or no rather than spend approximately 92,600.00
to install the drain so that Public Works employees could clean
it. Mr. Simolo noted that he hoe not received any quotations
for contracting thio service but would be willing to contact
contractors. After further discussion, motion was made by Nous,
seconded by Maxwell, and unanimously carried to outhorito the
Public Works Director to either hire a professional contractor
to clean the water reservoir or to install the drain if it seems
more economical after quotations are received from a professional
cloanor.
6. Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Placing the Question
of Whether or Not to Issue Ronde for a Municipal Piro Hall on
the November 5 Ballot.
Roproaontativoo of the architectural firm. TKDA, were present
and reviewed with tho Council preliminary floor plana and basic
Council Minutes - 10/9/64
bi drawings onthe proposed now Fire Hall. The architects noted
that a number of options still exist before final drawings would
be prepared and include such alternates as constructing the
building out of cement blocks or possibly a wood frame structure
with siding, or wood frame with stucco.
The Fire Hall Building Committee recommended that the Council
place the question of whether or not to issue bonds for a new
Fire Hall on the November 6 Ballot and let the voters decide.
The estimated bond issue that would be necessary for the construction
is estimated at $863,000.00. The site being considered as the
best choice for the Fire Hall location is in Block 15 at the
corner of 6th and Walnut Streets.
Motion was made by Maxwell, seconded by Blonigen, and unanimously
carried to adopt the resolution calling for a Special Election
placing the issue on the November 6 Ballot. See Resolution 1986 M42.
7. Consideration of an Application for a License to Sell Intoxicating
Liquor, On -Salo - Applicant. Stuart Hoglund DBA Oakwood Inn.
Mr. Stuart Hoglund requested an on -sale liquor license for his
proposed Oakwood Inn he is planning.
It was recommended by the City Administrator that if a license
In granted for the propooed Oakwood Inn, the annual license
fee should be paid to the City immediately.
Motion wan made by Maxwell, seconded by Blonigen, and unanimously
carried to approve the issuance of an on -pale intoxicating liquor
license to Stuart Hoglund DBA Oakwood Inn contingent upon the
submission of the proper insurance and bond forms.
S. Consideration of Ratification of Public Hearing Notices.
Recently, two separate developers have approached the City with
proposals and requests to have the City of Monticello finance
the projects under Industrial Rovanuo Bonds.
Construction 5, Inc., also known as Washington Business Cantor
Wont, is proposing to construct a 25,000 aq. ft. commarcial
office warehouse building east of Lauring Hillside Tarraca and
plans to request approval of issuing Industrial Revenue Bonds
to finance the project.
A second proposal has been submitted by Mr. Dick Maw which would
involve the reconstruction of the former Metropolitan Stadium
in Bloomington, Minnesota, to property located south of I -9d
In Monticello. A preliminary request would bo to issue Industrial
Revenue Benda in the amount of approximately 320,000,000.00.
3-
U
Council Minutes - 10/9/84
Motion was made by Maxwell, seconded by Maus, to adopt Resolutions J
1984 143 end e44 establishing a public hearing data to consider
the proposals by the above two developers to use Industrial
Revenue Bonds to finance their projects. The date of the public
hearing would be Monday, October 15, 1984. Voting in favor
was Maxwell. Maus, and Grimsmo. Voting in the opposition was
Blonigen due to a conflict of this date.
9. Consideration of Contracting a Portion of City Services.
The Public Works Director, John Simola, reviewed with the Council
four services he felt the City of Monticello could contract
out this winter. The four areas included 1) the hauling of
snow from Broadway and Highway 25, 2) plowing of all municipal
parking lots within the City of Monticello, 3) contracting for
'snow hauling from municipal parking lots, 4) contracting plowing
and cleaning of the sidewalk from the elementary school to the
high school on Broadway. Mr. Simola presented calculations
for all four operations, calculating City labor cost and equipment
cost and comparing this to estimates for contracting similar
services. Mr. Simola felt that in all four areae, the City
of Monticello could still provide these services cheaper than
contracting with private firma, but these figures were disputed
by Councilman Blonigen, who felt they were not accurate representations
of the actual City coat.
Mr. Simola noted that the Public Works Department needs an additional J
full -Limo employee not only for the extra work required during
the winter months but also throughout the year including parka,
Dutch Elm Disease, and other activities. It woo noted by the
Public Works Director that oven if an additional employee was
hired, there may be cases where contracting for such items as
plowing of the municipal Iota or removing snow from Broadway
might be desirable for factor service. An additional employee
would not solve all of the problems with anowplowing and hauling
but would provide additional help to enable the snowplowing
operation to continuo during snowfalls, whereas now the crown
may have to be pulled off the street duo to fatigue, etc.
Considerable discussion took place regarding the hiring of an
additional employee vs. contracting, and it was felt that oven
with an additional employee, the Public Works Director should
still consider contacting private contractors who would be available
for emergency snowplowing in municipal lots or snow hauling
if needed.
Motion woo made by Maxwell, seconded by Maus, to authorize the
Public Works Director to advertise for an additional full-time
Public Works Department employee. Voting in favor woo Maxwell,
Maus, and Grimamo. Voting in the opposition wan nlonigen, who
fait additional coat information should have been available
prior to this action.
." 0
Council Minutes - 10/9/84
I' , 10. Consideration oP Final Payment for Project 82-2, Meadow Oak.
UA final payment request has been submitted by Richard Knutson,
Inc., the general contractor on the 82-2 Improvement Project
in Meadow Oak Subdivision. The final payment amount has been
recommended for approval by the City Engineering Firm in the
amount of $53,659.86 provided some minor adjustments were made
to some gate valves, etc.
Motion was made by Maus, seconded by Maxwell, and unanimously
carried to approve final payment to Richard Knutson, Inc., in
the amount of $53,659.86 for Project 82-2 contingent upon repairs
being made to the two gate valves as noted by the Public Works
Director.
Rick Wolfotelijr
Assistant Administrator
U
-5-
jj MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELIq CITY COUNCIL
IOctober 15, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Arvo Grimsmo, Ken Maus, Jack Maxwell.
Members Absent: Fran Fair, Dan Blonlgen.
1. Call to Order.
2. Public Hearing - Proposals Under the Municipal Industrial Development
Act. and
3. Consideration of Adopting Resolutions of Preliminary Approval.
A. WASHINGTON BUSINESS CENTER WEST.
Mr. Gary LaFromboiso of Construction 5, Inc., informed the Council
of their plane to build a 25,000 sq. ft. commercial office/etorago
warehouse facility just east of Lauring Hillside Addition.
The proposed commercial complex was estimated to cost $875,000
and Construction 5, Inc., requested Council authorization to
apply for Industrial Revenue Bonds in the amount of 5800,000
to finance the project.
Mr. Bill Malone, property owner adjacent to the proposed development,
questioned the types of uses that may be allowed if this development
was to occur. It was explained that primarily the proposal
allows for light industrial manufacturing and/or office space
with commorcial storage.
Mr. Dan Nelson, with the lav firm of Holman 6 Graven, explained
to the public and the City Council that if a preliminary approval
to granted through adoption of a resolution, the Council is
merely authorizing an application to be submitted to the Minnesota
Energy and Economic Development Authority for their consideration
an to whether the City can proceed with the issuance of bonds
for this project.
After hearing no other comments, motion was made by Maus, seconded
by Maxwell, and unanimously carried to adopt a resolution giving
preliminary approval to the project and authorizing the proposal
to be submitted to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development
Authority for their consideration. Soo Resolution 1984 145.
B.MONTI STADIA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PROPOSAL.
IL Mr. Dick Maw, representing the Monti Stadia Development Company,
Special Council Minutes - 10/15/84
explained to the Council his proposed plan to disassemble and i
move the Metropolitan Stadium from Bloomington to Monticello.
The first choice as a site is a 100 -acre site located adjacent
to I-94 just east of the present Oakwood Industrial Park presently
owned by Mr. Jim Boyle. Mr. Maw noted that he has been working
on the idea of relocating the Met Stadium for approximately
2 years and narrowed his choices to Monticello because of its
freeway location and proximity to St. Cloud and the metropolitan
area.
Mr. Maw introduced Lynn Middleton, an engineer with the L.H. Sowles
Company, a largo steel erection firm. Mr. Middleton indicated
that the stadium is like a giant erector set and is bolted together
and could be economically disassembled and trucked to a new
site. Indications are that as each section is removed from
Bloomington, it could be trucked to Monticello and placed on
new footings. Mr. Maw also informed the Council that it was
hie opinion there would be no problem in getting a Performance
Bond coverage from an insurance company to insure that the project
would be completed satisfactorily once started.
Mr. Maw went on to further describe the possible uses for a
stadium in Monticello, including approximately 30 days of soccer
events, possibly 105 dates of AAA or a baseball franchise, an
additional 30-40 outdoor concert dates with miscellaneous local,
7 high school, and collage sporting events. The estimated total
_ usage dates could be as high as 160-200 dates per year, creating
up to 100 full-time jobo and an additional 100 part-time jobs.
The estimated cost presented by Mr. Maw to disassemble and erect
the structure in Monticello was $20,400,000.00, which is just
an estimate at this time.
Futuro piano for the stadium include additions such as a band
shell cone that could be moved to the infield for small concerto
to provide good acoustical sound along with tennis courts and
possibly a hockey rink. Additional ideas include anclooing
the hockey rink in a bubble for winter use. According to hie
preliminary calculations, the expected revenue to the corporation
would be S3 million per year with the debt payment being $2.7 million,
leaving a $300,000.00 profit. Gross ticket sales could be an
high as $16 million according to Mr. Maw. After the presentation,
the public hearing vas opened for commonto from the public regarding
the proposed development.
Mr. Larry Nolan questioned the ago of the present Mot Stadium
and whether it would still moot current building codas after
It is moved. Mr. Maw responded that the structural otoel is
otill an good as now, but, of course, the stadium would have
now wiring, toilato, a now stadium club, now acating, otc.,
and an architect would be usod to possibly altar the otructuro
somewhat to fit its new site in Monticello. y
Special Council Minutes - 10/15/84
Mr. Rick Carlson questioned whether the potential use of the
stadium for 10 or 40 concerts par year would create large traffic
problems and congestion problems and questioned whether Monticello
would really be set up for large rock concerts.
Mr. Bill Malone questioned the City Council on the background
of the developer and whether the City has researched whether
the City could get stuck holding the bag on this ambitious proposal.
Mr. Dick Maw indicated he was basically a marketing man but
would have a number of major investors backing such a project.
It or also noted by the City's representative from Holmes 6
Graven, Bond Attorneys, that Industrial Revenue Bonds, if approved
by the City, would not be the responsibility of the City for
repayment should such a project default.
HRA Chairman and Planning Commission Member, Don Cochran, noted
that the development plane presented could become the City's
nightmare in that no specifics have yet boon established by
the developer, and no guarantees for any soccer, baseball, or
concerto have been proven. Mr. Maw indicated that although
it may seem like a far-sighted dream at the present time, his
first priority is to get some kind of an indication from the
City of Monticello as to whether it would be willing to accept
the stadium proposal before he could firm up his letters of
intent and got the major backing he would need for such a project.
Mr. Ed Doran questioned what the City's responsibility or liability
would be In the worst sconario, that being the project would
fail. Again, it van noted that the City would not be financially
responsible for any repayment to the bond holders, but the project
could become a liability in that the City would have to determine
what to do with the property afterwards.
Mr. Bill Pair questioned whether the City's approval of a $20 million
bond Issue for this project could subject the City to future
limitations on ineuing other Industrial Revenue Bonds because
of the largo dollar amount of thio issue. It van noted that
present otaLutoo would not curtail the City from fnoulng or
requesting other projects just because of this one large issue.
City Administrator Tom Eidom questioned whether the project
could proceed foot enough to actually Gull bonds this year to
qualify for the 1904 pool of Industrial Revenue Bond money.
He notod that the duadllno for applying for the 1984 allocation
vas Friday, October 19, and that a 1% application fee totaling
5200,000.00 would have to be submitted.
It wan also noted by the City Administrator that the City would
have to expand largo amounts of money for engineering studios
and land use planning, etc., before ouch a project could be
given final approval. In addition, It appears that an Environmental
Special Council Minutes - 10/15/84
Impact Statement would be necessary for this large of a project;
1 and it was felt that this could not be done by year end 1984
and still sell the bonds in 1984. Some of the regulations regarding
Environmental Impact Statements could take as long as 180 days
before final approval could be given, and it appears very unlikely
that the developer could meet all the requirements and still
sell bonds yet this year. This was also the opinion of the
attorney from Holmes 6 Graven that it would take the best of
conditions to line up a financing package and be able to sell
the bonds in 1984.
Mr. Maw responded by noting that Industrial Revenue Bonds may
not necessarily be the only source of financing for this type
of project and that possibly he could still apply for Industrial
Revenue Bonds next year if it didn't appear he could meet the
deadline for 1984. He again noted that before any further steps
co-ald be taken by his company or a corporation could be ostablialied,
preliminary approval from the City would be necessary.
The major concerns of the Council centered on traffic problems
and the funneling of cars back onto the freeway both in the
easterly and westerly directions. It was noted that an engineering
and/or planning study would have to be completed before any
final commitment could be made.
' After concluding the public hearing, motion was made by Maxwoll,
L seconded by Maus, and unanimously carried to apply to the State
for the authority to Issue bonds for the $20 million project.
(: 7- �rh 1T&/, --
Rick Molfatollarr
Assistant Administrator
-4-
0
Council Agenda - 10/22/86
y_ 4 6 5. Public Hearings - Consideration of Requests to Vacate Utility
Easements. (T.E.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
According to common practice, whenever a new plat is recorded
the City retains an easement around the perimeter of every lot.
In the case with each of these requests, a single firm has bought
two lots that they wish to develop as one. with Fulfillment
Systems, they have built right over the lot line between Lot 6
and Lot 7. In order to clear title on the land, it is essential
to vacate the easements that run on each of those lot lines.
Similarly, Burger King has purchased both Lots 1 and 2 and wish
to develop them as a single parcel. Thus, the easement lying
on the south line of Lot 1 and the north line of 2 have been
requested to be vacated. Since they are, in fact, being developed
in the manner in which they are, City staff sees no reason to
retain these easements and does not anticipate ever needing
the use of them.
These items should be held separately even though I am presenting
them to you jointly. Each situation is identical. Upon the
closing of the hearing, then individual motions should be made
to vacate the eanemonts with a direction that said vacations
be recorded at the County.
Since these are mainly housakeoping motiono. I am not presenting
alternative actions. Staff does recommend that the easements
be vacated.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A copy of the oitos indicating the casements to be vacated.
ME
1
i ? ... ";" ;� ;"... ,. �. •: `..; ;' ti— �wa.,nyw vrv►? G.�„�. �y p„r i �'L
"`��a��� ►�,�-Y Via.
X51
0�
�• V.� VYr�"�„ VlrO►N1f.�
ncy.�
tj �
i 77t�
Council Agenda - 10/22/84
\_ 6. Consideration of Ordinance Amendment - Liquor Sales on Election Days. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
During the 1983 Legislative Session, the State of Minnesota
Statutes pertaining to sales of non -intoxicating and intoxicating
liquor on election days were amended. State Statutes 340.14,
Subdivision 1, pertaining to intoxicating liquor sales on election
days was amended allowing intoxicating liquors to be sold on
election days statewide. Also, Section 340.34, Subdivision 1,
regarding non -intoxicating liquors was also amended to allow
for the sale of beer, etc., on election days in Minnesota.
The deletion in the State Statutes still left the option of
each municipality to have a stricter ordinance which does allow
the City to still prohibit sales between 1:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M.
on any election day.
The City of Monticello's ordinances pertaining to non -intoxicating
beer sales and our own Municipal Liquor Store specifically state
that no sales shall occur during the hours of 1:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M.
on any election day. In order for the City to allow bear and
our own Municipal Off -Sale Store to sell, our ordinances must
be amended. Our ordinance pertaining to private liquor license
holders did not have this restriction in City ordinances, and
thus they were bound by State Statutes. Now that the State
of Minnesota has amended their Statutes allowing liquor sales
during election days, the private on-oalo licanocs within Monticello
wore allowed to be open, but 3.2 boor and our own Municipal
Off -Solo Store was not allowad to be open.
D. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. If the City wishes to follow the Stato Statutes and allow
liquor sales on election days, the enclosed ordinance amendment
allowing 3.2 boor sales and Municipal Liquor Off -Solos should
be adopted.
2. This alternative would be not to adopt an ordinance amendment,
but by doing so would still allow the private on-salo liquor
licenses to be open on election days but would still prohibit
the off-salo store and any 3.2 boor from being sold only.
Thio alternative does not appear to bo reasonable in that
unless an ordinance amendment is made to specifically prohibit
on-salo by the private liquor license holders, it doesn't
appear reasonable to allow on-oala and prohibit off-oalo
or 3.2 boor sales.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
CIt is recommended that the ordinance amendment be adopted to
-2-
Council Agenda - 10/22/84
�.- coincide with State Statutes and allow the Municipal Off -Sale
Store along with 1.2 beer to be sold on election day as is the
case now with on -sale liquor.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proposed ordinance amendment.
-3-
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 1984 NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS THAT ORDINANCE
SECTION 3-1-9: CLOSING HOURS PERTAINING TO NON -INTOXICATING
LIQUOR SALES AND ORDINANCE SECTION 3-3-5: HOURS OF OPERATION
PERTAINING TO INTOXICATING LIQUOR SALES AT A MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
STORE BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
3-1-9: Closing Hours: delete the following:
"No sale shall be made between the hours of one o'clock
(1:00 A.M.) and eight o'clock (8:00 P.M.) on any
election day in the District in which the election
shall be held except that the governing body of any
municipality may allow such sale in such municipality
during such hours while only a City election io being
held in such municipality. -
3 -3-5: Hours of Operation: delete the following:
"No Bale of intoxicating liquor shall be made before 8:00 P.M.
on any election day in the City."
Passed by the City Council thio 22nd day of October, 1984.
Arve A. Grimamo, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas A. Eidem
City Adminietrator
v
Council Agenda - 10/22/84
7. Consideration of Authorizing the Publication of a Summary of
the Cable Franchising Ordinance. IT. E.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
In September you adopted a Cable Franchising Ordinance that,
in its complete form, is 95 pages long. Statute allows for
the publication of ordinance summaries. The summary must, however,
be reviewed by the City Council and approved for publication
as a summary. Tom Creighton, Legal Counsel for the Cable Commission,
has submitted the enclosed summary with recommendation of publication.
This also is a housekeeping sort of activity. This 10 -page
document, if approved, will be published at the earliest possible
date in the Monticello Times. Since a large part of the Franchise
Ordinance Is technical in nature comprising franchising and
contract language, it meets the public interest and the public
right to know by simply publishing a summary of the terms of
the franchise.
Because it seems totally unrealistic to publish all 95 pages
of the original Franchise Ordinance, I am presenting no alternative
actions other than to publish the summary.
There is no staff recommendation for this item.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the ordinance summary.
-4-
C
ORDINANCE SUMMARY
Final Franchise
City of
An ordinance, including addendum with exhibits, granting
a franchise to Rite Cable Company of Minnesota, Ltd., (here-
inafter "Rite Cable") to operate and maintain a cable com-
munications system in the City of setting forth
conditions accompanying the grant of franchise; providing
for regulation and use of the system; and prescribing
penalties for the violation of its provisions.
STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE; FINDINGS.
The City of (hereinafter "City") adopts a
cable television franchise to bring about the development of
a cable television system and the continued operation of
it. Such a development can contribute significantly to the
communication needs and desires of many. Further, the City
may achieve better utilization and improvement of public
services. The City Council found Rite Cable's technical
ability, financial condition, legal qualifications, and
character to be appropriate to construct and operate a cable
television system within City.
ARTICLE I. SHORT TITLE AND DEFINITIONS
The ordinance shall be known and cited as the Cable
Communications Ordinance. The definition section includes
24 terms which are defined for the purpose of the franchise.
ARTICLE II. GRANT OF AUTHORITY AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 1. GRANT OF FRANCHISE AND ACCEPTANCE
The City grants to Rite Cable a non-exclusive franchise
to be properly executed and acknowledged by Rite Cable and
delivered to City. Rite Cable shall deposit with City a
non-refundable acceptance fee for the purpose of deferring
the costs and expenses of development of the franchise.
Security deposits, letters of credit, certificates of
insurance, bonds, and organizational and creation documents
of the company must be delivered to City.
0
SECTION 2. AUTHORITY GRANTED
The City grants to Rite Cable permission to use the
streets for erecting, constructing, operating and main-
taining the cable, communications system.
SECTION 3. AGREEMENT
Rite Cable agrees to be bound by all terms of the
franchise and to provide all services set forth in its
proposal to City.
SECTION 4. FRANCHISE TERM
The franchise shall be for a 15 -year term from the date
of acceptance.
SECTION S. AREA
The franchise is granted for the City as it exists from
time to time during the term of the Franchise.
SECTION 6. POLICE AND EMINENT DOMAIN POWERS
Rite Cable's rights are subject to the rights of eminent
domain of the City and to the policy powers of the City.
-J
SECTION 7. USE OF GRANTEE FACILITIES
The City has the right to install and maintain any
fixtures it desires upon the poles and within the under-
ground pipes and conduits and fixtures of Rite Cable.
SECTION 8. WRITTEN NOTICE
All notices shall be delivered in writing to the offices
of City and the St. Paul office of Rite Cable.
SECTION 9. RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS
No signals shall be transmitted from the subscriber
terminal except as required to provide service authorized by
the franchise and the subscriber. Information from sub-
scriber terminals may not be gathered or stored without the
express written permission of the subscriber. The terms and
conditions of the written authorization are included in this
section.
SECTION 10. CERTIFICATE OF C0NFIRMATION
Rite Cable must obtain a regular certificate of con-
firmation from the Minnesota State Cable Board.
L
ARTICLE III. DESIGN OF SYSTEM
SECTION 1. CHANNEL CAPACITY - SUBSCRIBER NETWORK
A system capable of providing at least 53 downstream
video channels and four fully activated upstream channels
shall be constructed pursuant to the conditions of the
proposal of Rite Cable.
SECTION 2. PICTURE QUALITY AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
Rite Cable will be required to transmit a signal to the
subscriber, and further to comply with all technical
standards of their proposal and Federal Communications Com-
mission requirements.
SECTION 3. TWO-WAY CAPACITY
Rite Cable shall initially activate return channels at
the time of system activation as reqiired by this section.
SECTION 4. FACILITIES
Rite Cable shall construct its facilities as set forth
in its proposal to the City.
SECTION 5. SPECIAL CHANNEL AND ACCESS REQUIREMENTS
The System shall carry broadcast stations, an emergency
override system and 5 special access channels including
public, school, government, leased, and a community
education -library access. The franchise details specific
access rules which must be developed by Rite Cable.
SECTION 6. SERVICE TO PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND EDUCATIONAL
INSTITUTIONS
Rite Cable will provide service to the governmental and
non-governmental institutions listed in Section 6 of the
franchise.
SECTION 7. INTERCONNECTION
The System serving the cities of Big Lake, Buffalo,
Cokato, Dassel, Delano, Elk River, Maple Lake, Monticello,
Rockford, and Watertown, Minnesota, shall be completely
interconnected. The System shall also be constructed so
C that other systems now or hereafter constructed in any area
adjacent to the System may be interconnected.
SECTION 8. NARROWCASTING
The System shall be capable of sending programs to each
community separately so that the residents of one community
may view a given program -while at the same time, residents
of another community may watch different programming at the
same time on the same channel.
SECTION 9. REGIONAL CHANNEL
The standard VHF channel 6 is designated for uniform
regional channel usage.
ARTICLE IV. SERVICES AND PROGRAMMING, SUBSCRIBER
CONTRACTS, COMPLAINTS
SECTION 1. SERVICES AND PROGRAMMING
Programming shall be provided as specified in the
proposal of Rite Cable. Programming shall be added and
deleted pursuant to the procedures of Section 1.
J
SECTION 2. INTERRUPTION OF SERVICE AND COMPLAINTS
Service shall not be interrupted unless reasonably J
necessary. If service is interrupted for more than 48 hours
in any 30 day period, subscriber shall be credited pro -rata
for such interruption. An office shall be maintained in the
area and shall be capable of receiving complaints and
requests for repairs or adjustments at any time seven days
per week. This section further details subscriber complaint
procedures.
ARTICLE V. CONSTRUCTION, INITIAL SERVICE AREA,
LINE EXTENSION AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
SECTION 1. INITIAL SERVICE AREA
All areas containing dwelling units within the city
shall be constructed as the initial service area.
SECTION 2. LINE EXTENSION POLICY
Service shall be extended to those areas not in the
initial service area pursuant to the formula of Section 2.
_a_ O
SECTION 3. CONSTRUCTION TIMETABLE
Rite Cable shall construct all areas of the initial
service area which contain dwelling units within fifteen
months of the granting of the State Certificate of Confirma-
tion. Delays in construction_ shall result in penalties
provided by the franchise.
SECTION 4. CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
Rite Cable shall comply with all construction standards
of the franchise as well as all applicable laws, ordinances,
rules, regulations and codes, federal, state and local.
SECTION 5. CONDITIONS ON USE
Rite Cable shall not, in its construction of the System,
interfere with any gas, electric or television fixture,
water hydrant or main, or sewer line. Section 5 also pro-
vides procedures for the raising and lowering of lines,
trimming of trees, and the recognition of potential
liability for persons damaging Rite Cable capabilities.
ARTICLE VI. SYSTEM OPERATIONS
SECTION 1. INFORMATION AVAILABILITY
City shall have the right of reasonable access to Rite
Cable's records.
SECTION 2. SERVICE CONTRACT
If Rite Cable maintains a service contract with sub-
scribers, the form of said contract is detailed in Section
2.
SECTION 3. SUBSCRIBER PRACTICES
There shall be no charge for disconnection of any
installation, service, or outlet. Section 3 also details
Rite Cable's right to disconnect for failure to pay the
monthly subscriber fees.
SECTION 4. FRANCHISE FEES, RATES, CHARGES, CHANGES IN FEES
AND PROCEDURES
Throughout the term of the franchise,. Rite Cable shall
pay to City an annual fee of 3% of all gross revenues. The
C rates provided in the franchise shall be 'guaranteed for 2
years after the franchise is certified by the Board or until
5- 0-7
one year after completion of construction in the initial
service area, whichever is longer. Basic rates shall be
regulated pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
franchise. Rates for other than Basic Service shall be
regulated pursuant to the terms and conditions of the fran-
chise. The City retains the right to review the performance
and technological upgrading of the System. Rite Cable shall
exercise its best efforts' to maintain a modern, state-of-
the-art System which is comparable to other operating cable
television systems similarly situated.
SECTION 5. FRANCHISE RENEWAL
The franchise may be renewed at any time for a period of
up to fifteen years or on a year to year basis at the sole
discretion of the City.
ARTICLE VII. INDEMNIFICATION, INSURANCE,
LETTER OF CREDIT AND BOND
SECTION 1. GENERAL
The City retains all rights of indemnification,
insurance, letter of credit or bond as provided in the
franchise.
SECTION 2.' INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
Rite Cable shall fully indemnify, defend and hold harm-
less, City and all of its agents and employees from
liability and judgments for damages in connection with:
Damage to persons or property, any claim arising out of the
franchise, Rite Cable's failure to comply with provisions of
the franchise, or any claim Rite Cable may have against
City.
SECTION 3. INSURANCE
Rite Cable shall maintain liability insurance for the
entire term of the franchise for amounts as specified in the
franchise and pursuant to the minimum requirements of this
section.
SECTION 4. LETTER OF CREDIT
Rite Cable shall maintain an irrevocable and uncondi-
tional Letter of Credit. The letter of Credit shall provide
that funds be paid to the City upon demand by the City pur-
suant to the procedures and minimum requirements of this J
section. This section further provides minimum amounts for
- 6 - 0
C
penalties such as failure to construct the system and
failure to comply with terms and conditions of the
franchise. Said penalties may be assessed against Rite
Cable by the City and collected directly from the Letter of
Credit. The Letter of Credit must be maintained pursuant to
the prcoedures and requirements of this section.
SECTION 5. BONDS
Rite Cable must maintain with the City a bond condi-
tioned upon the faithful performance by Rite Cable of the
franchise, and further conditioned upon the terms and
requirements of this section.
ARTICLE VIII. DEFAULT
SECTION 1. NOTICE AND DEFAULT
City shall notify Rite Cable in writing of violations of
the franchise. Rite Cable shall have thirty days to cure
such default, or be subject to the procedures of this
section leading to termination of the franchise.
ARTICLE IX. FORECLOSURE, RECEIVERSHIP
AND ABANDONMENT
SECTION 1. FORECLOSURE
Upon the foreclosure of judicial sale of the System, the
provisions of the franchise governing consent to transfer or
change in ownership shall apply.
SECTION 2. RECEIVERSHIP
City shall have the right to cancel the franchise 120
days after the appointment of a receiver or trustee.
SECTION J. ABANDONMENT
Rite Cable may not abandon any portion of the System
without having given not less than three months prior notice
to City and Board. Any such abandonment may be deemed a
cause for termination of the franchise.
- 7 3
ARTICLE X. PURCHASE OF THE SYSTEM
SECTION 1. GENERAL
The Section provides for the City's right to purchase a
system, either pursuant to the terms and conditons of a bona
fide purchase offer which'Rite Cable is willing to accept
regarding the system, or in the event of forfeiture, revoca-
tion or termination of the franchise.
SECTION 2. PROCEDURES
The procedures for the City's election to exercise its
rights to purchase the System are contained in this sec-
tion. The procedure provides for City's right to accept the
terms of a pending purchase offer, or the appointment of an
arbitration panel to establish the terms and conditions of
the purchase of the system.
ARTICLE XI. MISCELLANEOUS
SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OR CONTROL
Ownership in the system may not be transferred without
the prior written consent of the City. The procedures for
notifying the City of the transfer of ownership, and City
evaluation of said transfer, are provided for in this sec-
tion.
SECTION 2. REMOVAL AFTER TERMINATION OR REVOCATION
The City shall have the right to require Rite Cable to
remove, at Rite Cable's expense, all or any portion of the
System within City upon the revocation or termination of the
franchise pursuant to the terms and procedures of this sec-
tion.
SECTION 3. WORK PERFORMED BY OTHERS
Rite Cable must inform the City of the names and
addresses of any entity other than Rite Cable which shall
perform services pursuant to the franchise.
SECTION 4. GENERAL PROVISION ON RIGHTS AND REMEDIES
All remedies and rights given to City by the franchise
are in addition to any other rights which City might other-
wise have regarding the System or Rite Cable.
l
- 8 - 0
SECTION 5. APPLICABLE LAWS AND COURT DECISIONS:
SEVERABILITY
The franchise must at all times be in compliance with
the rules of the Minnesota State Cable Board and all laws,
ordinances and regulations of federal, state and city
government relating to the cable television system and the
franchise. If any provision of this franchise is declared
invalid or void, that section may be severed from the
franchise with the remaining sections in full force and
effect. If the City determines that a provision of the
franchise is affected by law, ordinance or regulation, City
shall have the right to amend, modify, alter or repeal any
provisions of the franchise to such reasonable extent as
necessary to carry out the intended purposes of the
franchise.
SECTION 6. GRANTEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF VALIDITY OF FRANCHISE
Rite Cable acknowledges that it has reviewed the
franchise and that under current law Rite Cable believes
that the franchise is not unreasonable or arbitrary.
ARTICLE XII. ADMINISTRATION AND ADVISORY BODY
SECTION 1. ADMINISTRATOR
The Commission shall be responsible for the administra-
tion of the franchise.
SECTION 2. ADVISORY BODY
The City may appoint an advisory body to monitor per-
formance of Rite Cable in executing the provisions of the
franchise.
SECTION 3. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY BY CITY
The City may delegate at any time its rights or obliga-
tions under the franchise to any body or organization.
ARTICLE XIII. ACCEPTANCE, INCORPORATION OF
OFFERING, EXHIBITS, PUBLICATION
SECTION 1. TIME OF ACCEPTANCE; GUARANTEE; INCORPORATION OF
OFFERING; EXHIBITS
CRite Cable shall accept the franchise pursuant to the
procedures included in this section. The proposal of Rite
Cable shall be incorporated by reference into the Fran-
- 9 - G)
chise. Summaries of the proposal shall be available in the
office of the City Clerk, the administrator, the Commission
attorney, the local office of Rite Cable, the office of any
school district in the City, and the State Cable Board. The
exhibits to the franchise are: Exhibit A - Schedule of
rates; Exhibit B The offering (Proposal) of Rite Cable.
The ordinance was passed and adopted the day of
1984.
- 10 - 0
Council Agenda - 10/22/84
IT
8. Consideration of Giving Final Approval to the Concept Plan and
the Development Stade Plan for Plaza Partners, a Planned Unit
Development. (T.E.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
After many weeks of rather vigorous debate and review, the Plaza
Partners PUD seems to be taking final form. The Planning Commission,
at its October meeting, gave final approval to the Concept Plan
and gave final approval to the Development Stage Plan contingent
upon final sign off by the City's Consulting Engineer. With
respect to the technical aspects of the public improvements
such as streets, sewer, and water, the basic design had been
found acceptable by OSM, but a letter from John Badalich to
Mr. Dolan, the developers' engineer, indicated some deficiencies
he wished to see corrected. In order to ensure those corrections
were made for final approval, the Planning Commission insisted
that a final sign off be done by the engineer. The only other
deficiency was the scope and design of the overall drainage
plan for the full 12 acres. That drainage plan was assigned
to the developers' engineer also to be given final approval
by the City's engineer without having to tomo back before the
Planning Commission a second time. With respect to the Concept
Plan, staff was able to recommend that final approval be granted,
noting, however, that the plan was not compiled into its final
(f recording form. Basically, all of the elements required for
a PUD wore present, but ware scattered throughout a variety
of documents, maps, and charts. I specifically directed that
all of the information that had been provided should be finally
compiled into the final recordable form for Council approval.
I indicated to Mr. Powers that if they wore unable to accomplish
that task, the item would be stricken from the agenda. I indicated
that operating on 11th hour approvals was no longer acceptable.
As of this writing, Thursday afternoon, the final documents
have not reached City Hall. I mat in consultation with Brad
Larson, the developers' legal counsel, and informed him of what
is required in torma of all of the covenants under a PUD. He
seemed to clearly understand what was required and has assumed
responsibility for completing that in a timely fashion. Mr.
Powers has indicated to Gary Anderson that all of the wheola
aro, in fact, in motion at this timo and that all documents
may be in City Hall by Friday afternoon.
Thus, a brief summary is that the Planning Commission has given
final approval to the Concept Plan and to the Development Plan.
The Development Plan, however, does have tho contingency that
a final engineering sign off shall be required. The davolopors
have boon informed of the engineering requirement and of tho
requirement that all PUD documentation be assembled into suitable
recording form. I suggest to the Council that, while the Concept
and Dovalopmont Plan aro, in fact, reaching completion, the
c
-5-
Council Agenda - 10/22/84
Council need not undertake review of this overall project unless
all of the minimum requirements have been met. In a conversation
this afternoon with the Mayor, he indicated that he concurred
that if the requirements are not met by Monday night, the item
will be simply passed over on the agenda and hold over until
the next meeting. Staff strongly recommends that the Council
hold to that position.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Assuming that OSM provides final sign off and that the entire
PUD package is complete, the following alternative actions apply:
1. Grant final approval to the Concept Stage and the Development
Stage of Plaza Partnere PUD. In addition to granting these
approvals, the owners/operators of Wendy's would like to
have approval of sewer and water installation to expedite
their construction. At a special meeting hold with several
staff, consultants, and the developers, we agreed that ouch
an installation is feasiblo oven before final construction
stage approval.
2. Do not grant approval based on some inadequacy or deficiency
that is discovered at the presentation. We believe we have
covered every applicable regulation, but the Council may
identify some problem area that has not been satisfactorily
addressed.
If the final sign off from OSM has not boon submitted and the
PUD in not compiled into its final form, then the following
alternatives apply:
1. Deny approval based on an incomplete application.
2. Grant approval with certain contingencies attached and an
enforcement policy dologatod to staff. This letter alternative
simply otatoo that all of the elements aro complete and
satisfactory but the execution of those elements are essential
to a quality development and that the successful execution
will be ovarsoon by staff. This action primarily takes
it off of the Council agenda oven for future meetings.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Assuming all documentation and engineering sign off is complete
and intact, staff rocommondo granting final approval to both
the Concept Stage and tho Development Stage of this PUD. On
the other hand, staff recommends no approval be granted if the
application is incomplete. As I indicated in the Reference
C
and Background section, this has boon a long and arguous process
-6-
C
Council Agenda - 10/22/84
9. Review of the Amended Comprehensive Plan and Consideration of
Adoption. (T.E.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
In the middle of last summer, staff presented to the HRA, the
Planning Commission, and the City Council, the revised Comprehensive
Plan sections that refer to goals and policies. Several comments,
suggestions, and amendments were incorporated into the rewriting
of the Goals and Policies sections. Upon completion of those
two sections, staff began the revision of the Guide Plan section.
What we are presenting for Council consideration at this time
is unlike what we presented for the Goals and Policies section.
If you will recall, we presented you with a copy of the original
text accompanied by a worksheet citing page and paragraph number
and how wesuggested it be changed. We began to use the same
approach in the Guide Plan when we discovered that the Guide
Plan did not require that type of radical treatment.
The Guide Plan did have some sections totally removed from it
such as references to a ring -road system through the downtown.
We also rewrote the section on Parks and Open Space since we
found it to be wordy and uninforming. Generally speaking, a
Guide Plan is a statement of target levels of development.
Another way to look at the Guido Plan is that from goals to
land use guide the City is moving from the more general to the
more specific. For instance, a goals statement might refer
to providing quality industrial development aitoo, while the
Guido Plan might specifically state that hard surfaced parking
lots and landscaping will be required in industrial parka.
Also, the Land Use Guido portion of the Comprehensive Plan is
leas unable than the Goals and Policies sections. The Land
Use Guido tends to oat standards for development which should
contribute to the accomplishment of the goals as stipulated
in the early part of the Plan.
Other than the major deletions that I referred to with roopoct
to ring road and some park and roc verbiage, no substantial
changes have boon made in the Land Use Guido. Consequently,
we think tho boat way to review it would be to compare it against
your existing Land Use Guido.
The Planning Commission, at their last mooting, waa provided
with copies and wont over the review. They found nothing objectionable
in the Land Use Guido section. They then paosod a motion formally
adopting the entire revised Comprehensive Plan as written.
They did make nota that the maps and charts, of course, need
to bo brought up to data when the final document goes to printing.
-e-
Council Agenda - 10/22/84
1_ B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Upon review of the Land Use Guide Plan, return to staff
with suggested revisions and corrections. Request that
the revised Plan be passed before the Planning Commission
and return to Council for adoption at a later date.
2. Upon review of the Guide Plan section, make finding that
the revised Comprehensive Plan is complete. Adopt a motion
adopting the 1984 Revised Comprehensive Plan.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff feels that the Land Use Guide Plan in its relative importance
to the overall plan is quite innocuous. We f -el that the necessary
data has been addressed and the rewrite of the section is much
more workable and common language oriented. Based on staff
acceptance and Planning Commission acceptance, we recommend
that the City Council, unless there are some glaring difficulties,
adopt the 1984 revision of the Comprehensive Plan in total.
This adoption will allow staff to got right into the heart of
the Zoning Ordinance with all of its particulars.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the narrative portions of the Comprehensive Guide Plan,
which has already been delivered to you under separate cover.
-9-
Council Agenda - 10/22/84
r, 10. Consideration of Setting a Special Meeting to Canvass Election
Returns and Declare the Results of the Election. (T.E.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Minnesota Statute 205.185 requires that within two days after
an election the governing body shall canvass the returns and
declare the results of the election. Since the election will
be held before the Council next has a meeting, this is the appropriate
time to set that time. Except in an extremely close race that
might be contested, this step has become largely a formality
and three members being present would suffice. with the election
being hold on Tuesday, I think it would be most appropriate
to hold the special canvass meeting the following day, Wednesday.
I recommend that we hold it at 4:00 or 5:00 in the afternoon.
This would provide me an opportunity to prepare a final summary
list for you that had been certified to the County and would
require about 5 minutes of your time to simply stop in and adopt
the motion declaring the results.
This being required by Statute, there are no real alternative
actions except to select a time and day.
Staff recommends that it be held in the afternoon on Wednesday.
There is no supporting data for this item.
-10-
GENERAL FUND OCTOBER 1984
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Olson & Sons Electric - Repairs to Pump House & Senior Citizen Ctr
2,110.64
19541
MN. State Treasurer - Watercraft Receipts
12.00
19542
MN. State Treasurer - Snowmobile Receipt:
40.00
19543
MN. State Treasurer - PERA Withholdings
426.17
19544
Equitable Life Assurance Company - Ins. premium Hansen & Theisen
40.00
19545
Stuart Hoglund - Variance fee reimbursement
25.00
19546
Robert Nelson - Assessment Reimbursement
97.02
19547
Corrow Sanitation - September Garbage contract payment
4,670.00
19548
Stuart Hoglund - Raimb. for Ind. Rev. Bonds expense
318.51
19549
State Capitol Credit Union - Withholdings - payroll
125.04
19550
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial services'at Library
141.28
19551
ARva Grimsmo - Mayor Salary
175.00
19552
Dan Blonigen - Council Salary
125.00
19553
Fran Fair - Council Salary
125.00
19554
Ken Maus - Council Salary
125.00
19555
Jack Maxwell - Council Salary
125.00
19556
YMCA of Mpls - Monthly contract payment
312.50'
19557
James Preusse - Cleaning services at City Hall
275.00
19558
MN. State Treasurer - FICA Withholding@
2,416.46
19559
Commissioner of Revenue - State Withholdings
2,326.00
19560
Wright County State Bank - Federal Withholdings
4,099.00
19561
MN. State Treasurer - Watercraft Receipts
42.00
19562
MN. State Treasurer - Snowmobile Receipts
71.00
19563
Wright County State Bank - Money Market Account
35,000.00
19564
Security Federal Savings & Loan - Money Market Account
35,000.00
19565
MN. State Treasurer - PERA Withholdings
902.84
19566
State Building inspector - Building Permit Surcharge Fee
861.88
19567
Gwen Bateman - Dog Contract - September 1984
665.00
19568
Leaf Brothers - Clothes
7.60
19509
U.S. Postmaster - Stamps
370.00
19570
NSP - Utilities
9,545.41
19571
Keith Crandall - Tres Replacement reimbursement
21.18
19572
MN. State Treasurer - Watercraft Receipts
33.00
19573
MN. State Treasurer - Snowmobile REcaipts
55.00
19574
Thomas Eidem - Mileage Allowance
300.00
19575
State Capitol Credit Union - Withholdings
135.04
19576
North Central Public Service - Utilities
1,459.66
19577
MN. State Treasurer - FICA Wlthholdings
2,43G.49
19578
MN. State Treasurer - PERA Withholdings
1,341.08
19579
Jerry Hermes - Cleaning Contract - Library
137.50
19560
Monticello Fire Department - Fire Depart. Wages thru 9/30/84
629.00
19581
Enviornmental Resource Development - Req. Fees - Allen Pelvit
15.00
19582
Anoka County Services - Payroll Deductions
68.00
19583
SMA Construction - Steel for Air Dryer - WWTP
102.25
19584
IIC11 Construction Inc. - Rental of forklift - WWTP
60.00
19585
Goudin Company - Hardcopper - WWTP
15.47
19586
Continental Research Corp. - Cleaners - Water & WWTP Depart.
798.07
19587
Sullair - Fan motor & impeller - WWTP
2,200.00
19568
Orr Scholen Mayeron & Assoc. - Engineering Fees - August
6,308.76
19589
Water Products - Meters, valves, ate.
1,069.92
19590
Olson & Sons Electric - Repair on pump house
138.95
19591
Diane Jacobson - Dap. Reg. Seminar fees
20.66
19592
Smith,Pringle,llaya■ - Legal lea■ - July through Sept.
994.00
19593
0//
GENERAL FUND OCTOBER 1984
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Unitog Rental Service - Uniforms for September
140.80
19594
Braun Engineering - Soil Tesing - Hart 6 Cedar & New Fire Hall
2,670.95
195'
Banker's Life Insurance - Group Health Insurance Premium
4,025.44
1959""
Richard Knutson, Inc. - Final Payment 09 - 82-2 Project
53,659.86
19597
University of Minn. - Reg. Fees - Gary Anderson
15.00
19598
Our Cron Hardware - Pipes, valves, gaskets, drill bits,gloves, etc.
336.53
19599
Sherburne County Equipment - Blades for Park Depart.
52.41
19600
St. Cloud Appraisal, Inc. - Appraisals for new Fire Hall & road
650.00
19601
St. Cloud Restaurant Supply - Towels for City Hall & Parka
35.78
19602
St. Cloud Fire Equip. - Repair of Equipment for Fire Depart.
206.95
19603
The Economic Press Inc. - Subscription
25.15
19604
Foster - Franzen Agency - Insurance for Real & Prop. 6 An ilme Car
323.25
19605
Lindberg Decorating - City Hall Painting
6,372.30
19606
Snyder Drug - Film and masks - Fire Depart.
18.91
19607
National Bushing Parte - Hydr. jack, clamps, air filters, etc.
397.63
19608
Moon Motors - Parts for Park Depart.
84.18
19609
MN. Public Employer Relations Assoc - Membership Dues
85.00
19610
International Institute of Municipal Clarks - Membership Fees
35.00
19611
Consolidated Preightways - Freight charges - air cleaner - WWTP
57.21
19612
Griefnow Shoat Metal - Pump House'- Material & labor
292.00
19613
E.L. Marketing - Election Supplies
156.50
19614
Independent Lumber - Lumber, concrete - Maint. Bldg.
186.36
19615
Glidden Paint - Block Filler 6 Paint - Maint Bldg.
491.68
19616
J.M. Oil Company - Gas - Street Depart.
222.48
19617
Gary Anderson - Mileage Expense
100.95
19618 '
Weldor Pump - Motor and impollor
1,645.98
19619
Central Eyewear - Glasses - Mary Rath=
25.00
1962'
RQR Enterprise - Fluke Motor - WWTP
152.75
1961 d
Centruy Lab. - Ice pellets and doordorirar
655.49
19622
Coast to Coast - Drill bits, tape, poly, rope, glue, etc.
151.26
19623
Monticell Times - Advertising & Times Subscription
593.74
19624
Maus Foods - Supplies
120.64
19625
Bridgewater Telephone - Phone
880.19
19626
Big Lake Lumber - Lumber - Maint. Bldg.
57.68
19627
Midwest Computer Services - Programming & Testing - WWTP
129.65
19628
Monticello OK Hardware - Filter & Toilet Itolder - Library
23.15
19629
Phillips Petroleum - Gas for Piro Depart. & W,T1'P
49.18
19630
Mobil Oil Corp - Gas - Piro Depart & WWfP
108.62
19631
Northwestern Bell - Fire Phone
38.97
19032
AT 6 T Info Systems - Fire Phone
3.59
19633
Davis Electronic Service - Repair of equipment - Fire Depart
288.50
19634
Orkin Exterminating Co. - Pest Control Contract
106.00
19035
Marco Products - Office supplies
80.91
19036
Monticello Office Products - Office supplies
75.75
19637
Monticello Printing - Printing - Fire Depart. & Sewer & Water Dep.
351.50
19638
Local 049 - Union Dues
126.00
19639
Hayden -Murphy - Repairs - STrestDepart.
41.57
19640
Gould Bros. - Switch & Jets - wwTP
15.07
19641
Harry -a Auto Supply - Oil Filter, tape, bolts, etc
15.71
19642
Central McGowan - Cylinder Rental
2.48
19643
Tom Eidom - Expenses
21.08
19644
Acucraft, Inc. - Repair Manifold - WWTP
128.50
19644
First Bank Mpla. - Public Fund Charge
16.00
1964 i
Wright County Sheriff's Depart. - Contract Services - Sept.
9.494.38
19647
Ciruy's Johnson & Assoc. - Computer Charges for August
290.00
19648
Videlity Bank & Trust Co. - 1974 0.0. Parkiny Facility BonA
2.200.95
19649
`
/�
GENERAL FUND OCTOBER 1984
AMOUNT
CHECK
The Forms Group - Election Supplies
68.25
19650
�f Buffalo Bituminous - Partial Payment on 84-1, 2 6 3 Project
39,026.00
19651
• National Life Ins. - Insurance Premium - Tom Eidem
100.00
19652
MN. Deputy Reg. ASSOC. - 1985 MDRA Dues for Deputy Registrar
100.00
19653
Stephens- Peck, Inc. - Title Hook for Deputy Registrar
24.00
19654
Mark Wallen - Travel 6 School Expense - Fire Department
254.00
19655
Maus Tire Service - Repairs - Street Department
8.00
19656
Rick Wolfsteller. - MFOA Conference k MIleage
207.58
19657
Leef Brothers - Charge for damaged garments
49.50
19658
Earl P. Anderson 6 Assoc. - Signs for Street Depart i Par West
1,084.70
19659
Wright County Highway Depart. - Culverts for Hoglund t Kjellberg
731.50
19660
Hamele Recreation - Picnic tables for Parks
889.39
19661
Commissioner of Revenue - Water Sales Tax - 3rd Quarter
223.30
19662
Gary Anderson - Car Insurance Allowance
120.00
19663
$250,353.61'
1
Payroll for September
27,013.97
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR OCTOBER
$277,367.58
0//
LIQUOR FUND
LIQUOR DISBURSEMENT FOR OCTOBER - 1984 AN= CHECK
Ed Phillips i Sons Co. - Liquor
3,266.16
11421
MN. State Treasurer - PERA WIthholdinge
66.93
11422
State Capitol Credit Union -'Payroll deductions
20.00
11423
State Treasurer -FICA Withholdings
268.15
11424
Commissioner of Revenue - State Withholdings
225.00
11425
Wright County State Bank - Federal Withholdings
412.40
11426
MN. State Treasurer - PERA Withholdings
94.55
11427
Ed Phillipe - Liquor
9,602.28
11428
Twin City Wino Company
11,616.35
11429
Northern States Power - Utilities
753.92
11430
Griggs, Cooper i Co. - Liquor q
6,910.30
11431
State Capitol Credit Union- Payroll Deductions
20.00
11432
Twin City Wine Co. - Wine
1,481.01
11433
Eagle Wino Co - Wine
1,679.09
11434
North Central Public Service Co - Utilities
31.58
11435
MN. State Treasurer - FICA Withholdings
275.28
11436
MN. Stato Treasurer - PERA WIthholdinge
165.77
11437
Century Laboratories - Iso
63.14
11438
Dahlheimer Diet. - Beer
11,634.29
11439
Thorpe Dist. - Bear
1,843.45
11440
Dick Beverage Co. - Boor
1,259.20
11441
Day Distributing Co - Beer
777.55
11442
Grosalein Beverage Co - Boor
9,020.65
11443
Maus Foods - Supplies
27.79
114
Coast to Coact - Supplies
21.03
114
Bernick's Pepsi Cola - Pop, etc.
318.15
11446
Viking Coco -Cola - Pop, misc, etc.
246.10
11447
Monticello Office Products - Office supplies
37.31
11448
Judo Candy i Tobacco - misc. mdco.
580.23
11449
Old Dutch Foods, Inc. - Misc. mdso.
174.95
11450
Seven -Up Bottling - Pop, misc. mdse.
127.00
11451
Olson 6 Sone, Inc. - Repairs on Cooler
54.46
11452
Ndnkor's Life - insurance Premium
364.91
11453
Gruya, Johnson i Assoc. - Computer Chargee - August
110.00
11454
NRC Corp. - Ribbons for cash register
54.54
11455
Monticello Times - Advertising
I 128.00
11456
Yonak Sanitation - Garbage Pickup
82.50
11457
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone Service
L 48.29
11450
Liofort Trucking - Freight Chargee
I 221.95
11459
rayroll for September
13,544.77
TOTAL. DISBURSEMENTS FOR OCTOBER
57,630.03
0