Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 04-25-1988AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL (. Monday, April 25, 1988 - 7:30 p.m. Mayor: Arve A. Grimsmo Council Members: Fran Fair, Bill Pair, Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held April 11, 1988. 3. Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests, and Complaints. 4. Public Hearing on a Proposal to Issue Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds - Clow Stating Company. 5. Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Providing for the Issuance of Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds - Clow Leasing and Clow Stating Company. 6. Consideration of a Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for Streetacape Project and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids. 7. Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Setting the Sale of G.O. Improvement Bonds for Streetscape Project and County Road 39 Fast ` Projects. B. Consideration of variance Appeal to Allow a Loading Berth to be Constructed in the Public Right-of-way Setback Requirement - Applicant, Automatic Garage Door Cotany. 9. Consideration of Concession Building Costs and Authorization to Proceed - NSP Softball Fields. 10. Consideration of Constructing Well A4. 11. Consideration of Allowing Lions Club to use Ellison Park for July 3rd Celebration. 12. Consideration of Bills for the Month of April. 13. Adjourn. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, April 11, 1988 - 7:30 p.m. Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen Members Absent: None 2. Approval of Minutes. Motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Fran Fair, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held March 28, 1988. Voting to approve the minutes were Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Warren Smith, and Dan Blonigen. Arve Grimsmo abstained from voting, as he did not attend the March 28, 1988, meeting. 3. Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests and Complaints. Gene Bauer and Jim Lindberg requested city funding which would assist them in operating a Saturday night program for junior high aged children. The purpose of the program is to provide junior high school students with an option for constructive use of their time during summer weekends. The program is to consist of supervised dances and social events. Bauer and Lindberg noted that students are charged $1 admission at the door, and the cost to operate the program last year was $4,400. At this point, Council discussed the merits of providing a constructive diversion for junior high school students. Although it will not solve the problem, it was recognized that the program might indirectly impact the cruising problem in a positive way. Warren Smith noted that kids on the sidewalks is a problem and that it's not just the care on the streets that are causing the cruising problem. Mayor Grimsmo noted that the City needs to take positive action in improving the situation and that it should channel kids into positive directions. Councilmember Blonigen concurred by saying that city money is better spent directing children in a positive way than by spending money on tougher law enforcement. As this discussion came to a close, Council discussed the need to develop longer range plans that will satisfy the recreation and leisure activity needs of the local youth. It was noted by Bauer and Lindberg that the task force would be willing to work with the City in creating long term solutions. Finally, Bill Fair requested an annual report to be submitted by the organizers of the youth night which would outline attendance and describe programs developed through the program. It was also suggested that the program be provided for both Friday and Saturday night and that the organizers should attempt to broaden the base of participation as much as possible. There being no further discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair to award 61,000 to the youth task force represented by Gene Bauer and Jim Lindberg. Motion seconded by Warren Smith. Motion passed unanimously. Council Minutes - 4/11/88 Gene Carlson of D 6 D Bus Service was in attendance to voice his concern for the closing of Highway 39. He noted that the closing will place a particular hardship on the bus service and school district. John Simola noted that there is just not enough right-of-way to allow for the construction of a bypass road. He went on to note that the contractor will maintain a narrow pathway for use by his own vehicles and by emergency vehicles only. In addition, the road will be open during certain hours of the day. Those hours will be established based on input generated at an upcoming community meeting. School Superintendent, Shelly Johnson, voiced his support for the bus company and noted that the school transportation fund will be impacted by this detour. 4. Update on Well k3 Test Drillings. Staff noted that test drillings neighboring proposed deep well @3 reveal that deep well 13 can be extended beyond its current level and reap an expected capacity of 1,000 gallons per minute. Staff recommended that deep well @3 be completed because the additional cost of $25,000 to complete the well is reasonable and because $44,000 has already been invested in developing the well to the present stage. Deep well i3 could serve as a backup well providing access to water located in a glacial drift formation that is different than other primary city wells, thereby providing a good backup in case the primary wells become contaminated. John Badalich and Gene Anderson of OS14 outlined the procedure by which well p3 will be completed. It was estimated that the cost to complete the well is $25,000. Mayor Grimsmo noted that the City really does not have an alternative but to go ahead with development of this well. It was also noted by staff that the test well S4 located 1,800 feet the south of well 13 appears to be a perfect site for a primary well. Tests show that the expected volume capacity of the well will match 1,500 gallons per minute. Councilmember Blonigen asked if wells #3 and f4 will be serviced by one pump house. Public Works Director Simola responded by saying that one pump house can service both wells; however, the original design intended for well 13 will need some modifications in order for it to service both wells. There being no further discussion on this matter, motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to complete well 13 at an estimated cost of $25,000. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Consideration of Awarding` Bid for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements on West County Road 39 - Grossnickle Property. City Administrator Wolfateller reviewed the status of the situation. He noted that the total project cost is $49,000 with $44,000 of that being assessable to Grossnickle and golf course property. Wolfateller noted that the coat per buildable lot for the project is $11,000. Wolfateller went on to outline several options for allocating the total project cost among benefiting properties. After discussion by Council, it was tentatively established that the maximum assessment for the Council Minutes - 4/11/88 Grossnickle property would be about $8,000 for each of the three lots that she could create, with the balance of the assessment to be paid by the Golf Course. Grossnickle was reminded that the cost to improve her property will be offset by the added value created by the installation of the sewer and water service. Mrs. Grossnickie's daughter disagreed noting that the additional costs of subdividing the property when added to the cost of installing sewer and water will not be offset by the added value created. Mrs. Grossnickle asked also what the normal cost for developing sewer and water service per lot is for other communities. City Engineer Badalich noted that the cost to provide sewer and water service to the Grossnickle project is only slightly higher due to the construction problems caused by the high water table in the area. it was also noted by John Badalich that the City has until May 23, 1988, to make a decision on the matter, as at that time the contract bid sunsets. No further action was taken on this matter. 6. Consideration of Conditional Acceptance of Chelsea Road Improvement Project. Mr. Bill Block, consulting engineer for the Chelsea Road project owned by Jim Boyle, appeared before the Council requesting consideration of a conditional acceptance of Chelsea Road improvement project. Mr. Block noted that Jim Boyle was not able to appear at the meeting because of a delay in his flight to Minneapolis from Detroit. Council reviewed a letter submitted by Jim Boyle'a engineer which outlined plans for meeting city requirements and also requested that the City accept the street project on a condition that all requirements be met at sometime in the future. Council reviewed the requirements that have not been met by the developer of the road and determined that it would be premature at this time to accept the road. Council directed the City Attorney to work with the developer and the developer's engineer in establishing a plan that will protect the City's interests regarding this matter. City Attorney, Tom Bayes, was in attendance and noted that the City should not accept the road until all requirements are met, He went on to say that the City should override previous requirements only if such action is of great public concern. No formal action taken an this matter. Consideration of Concession Building Pians. John Simola informed Council that approximate coat of the project is $30,000. Simola was not able at this time to provide exact figures for the cost of the atructure, as the bidding process was not yet complete as of the time of the Council meeting. It was simola's concern, as well as Jeff Michaelis' of the Softball Association, that the City should make a decision on this matter at the April it council meeting because the foundation of the structure needed to be started and completed prior to organized use of the field. Councilmember Bill Fair noted that he isn't comfortable with potential for a higher coat than anticipated. Simola noted, too, that this is a concern of his as well, but went on to say that if the costs come in higher than expected, the City Council may elect to wait until after the next budget cycle to complete the project or develop a wood frame structure as a less expenaive but higher maintenance alternative. Council Minutes - 4/11/88 After discussion, motion was made by Pran Fair to approve the laying of the foundation for the concession stand with a re-evaluation of proceeding with the remainder of the structure if budget figures come in Appreciably higher than $30,000. Motion was seconded by Bill Fair. voting in favor was Fran Pair, Bill Fair, Arve Grimsmo. Opposed: Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen. 8. Consideration of Awarding Bids on Liquor Store Landscaping. Three bids were received by the City, with the low bid submitted by Steve's Elk River Nursery for a total amount of $7,048. After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Bill Fair, to award the bid to the low bidder which was Steve's Elk River Nursery in the amount of $7,048. 9. Consideration of Walt Mack's Retirement and Matt Theisen's Appointment as Superintendent. Motion was made by Dan Blonigen to acknowledge the retirement of Walt Mack and approve appointment of Matt Theisen to the position of waterwork Superintendent. Motion was seconded by Bili Fair. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Consideration of Authorizing for Water Deoartment Position and Posting of Opening with Union. Public works Director Simola noted that the job description for the position vacated by Matt Theisen needed updating. After discussion, a motion was made by Bill Pair to authorize development of a new job description. Motion was seconded by Warren Smith. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Consideration of Request for One (1) Day Set-up/3.2 Beer License for Ducks Unlimited Banquet and one Ili Day 3.z Beer License tor July 3rd Celebration - Lions Club. Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, to approve said licenses. Motion carried unanimously. 12. In other natters, the City Council discussed the possibility of establishing a center for collecting waste material such as auto parts, metal, unrepairable appliances, or other items otherwise known as junk. Staff was directed to investigate methods by which the City can assist citizens' efforts to clean up the neighborhoods by providing a place to take unwanted materials. There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned. r � Je O'Neill d Assistant Administrator Council Agenda - 4/25/88 4. Public Hearing on a Proposal to Issue Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds - Clow Starrping Company. IR.W.1 A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: During February 1988 I was contacted by Mr. Dick Heide, attorney at Faegre and Benson, who was representing Clow Stamping Company requesting the City Council consider the refunding of the Commercial Development Revenue Bonds that were issued for Clow Stamping Company project back in 1980. Mr. Heide indicated that Clow Stamping was in the process of refinancing their original bond issue that the City of Monticello approved in 1980 in an attempt to lower the interest rate on the bonds. As with the issuance of the original bonds, a public hearing is required to be held by the City of Monticello; and if approved, the Council would adopt a resolution which would authorize Clow Stanping Company to proceed with their refinancing. When I was initially contacted by Mr. Heide, I informed him that they should immediately contact Holmes and Graven, the City's bond counsel, and provide them with all documents pertaining to this refunding issue. Mr. Daniel Nelson of Holmes and Graven has been supplied with all the documents and information pertaining to the refunding proposal and will be supplying the City with their opinion protecting the City's interest. I have indicated to Mr. Heide that I saw no difficulty with the refunding proposal provided our bond counsel also gave the project their okay. This refinancing proposal by Clow Stamping is similar to the refunding proposal approved by the Council last year for the Medical Facilities Company. In 1980, the original bonds were sold in the amount of $975,000 at an average interest rate of approximately 12 percent. The refunding issue proposes to sell $950,000 at an estimated average coupon rate of approximately 9.4 percent, a savings of approximately 2-1/2 percent over the life of the bond. The refinancing proposal would clearly enable Clow Stamping to save some money on its interest cost, and it seems extremely remote that the refunding would affect the City•a credit rating in the future. A representative of the Clow Stamping Company, along with their bond counsel, will be present at the meeting to conduct the public hearing and request Council adoption of a resolution authorizing the refunding to close on Wednesday, April 27, 1988. At the close of the public hearing, the Council can move on to the next agenda item to consider adoption of the resolution approving the refunding issue. Im Council Agenda - 4/25/88 1, 5. Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Providing for the Issuance of Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds - Clow Leasing and Clow Stamping Company. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE PND BACKGROUND: After the testimony has been received and the public hearing closed, the Council will be asked to consider adopting the resolution granting City approval for the issuance of the Conmiercial Refunding Bonds for Clow Stamping. As I indicated in the previous agenda item, the City's bond counsel, Holmes and Graven, has been supplied with all the information and documents pertaining to this refunding issue and has indicated that all negotiations are appropriate and that the City can adopt the resolution of approval without any exposure. The City of Monticello has not incurred any cost associated with this bond refinancing. If the resolution is adopted, the bond closing will take effect Wednesday, April 27. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Adopt the resolution granting approval. 2. Do not adopt the resolution. C. STAFF RFOOMMENDATION: City staff recommends that the resolution be duly adopted by motion and a second. The City has no financial exposure in regards to the successful refunding of these bonds. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the resolution requested Lo be adopted by the Councils Letter from Mr. Dan Nelson of Holmes and Graven, City's bond counsel, supporting the Council's action. NOTE: Over the past two months I have received numerous documents pertaining to this refunding issue, including loan agreements, trust indentures, mortgages, and assorted other documents that I have not included with your agenda package. These legal documents are certainly available for any Council member that may wish to see them, but I have not photocopied Lhem for each member, as they consist of approximately 85 pages of information. -2- NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING ON ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA ON BEHALF OF CLOW STAMPING COMPANY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota will meet at 7:30 P.M. on Monday April 25, 1988 at the City Hall in the City of Monticello for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on the proposed issuance by the City of Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469. 165 , as amended. The type and use of the facilities to be refinanced by the issuance of the refunding bonds is a manufacturing facility containing approximately 29,000 square feet, the site thereof, consisting of approximately 4.1 acres of land, and various items of manufacturing equipment, furniture and fixtures. The maximum aggregate face amount of obligations to be issued with respect to the refinancing of the facilities is $950,000. The proceeds of issuance of the obligations, together with other funds of the Company, will be used on May 1, 1988, to redeem in whole the outstanding City of Monticello Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Clow Stamping Co., Inc. Project), Series 1980. The operater and user of the facilities to Clow Stamping Company (the "Company"), a Minnesota corporation (formerly, Clow Stamping Co., Inc.), and the owner of the facilities is Clow Leaning (the "Partnership"), a Minnesota general partnership whose general partners are Everett L. Clow and Gladyce E. Clow, the majority shareholders in the Company. The partnership leasee the facilities to the Company. The location of the existing facilities Is the southwest corner of the intersection of Chelsea Road and Industrial Drive in the Oakwood Industrial Park in the City of Monticello. All persons with views on the refinancing of these existing facilities and the proposed issue of refunding bonds may express their views, both orally and in writing, at ouch time and place. Dated April 7, 1988. BY ORDER OF TIDE: CITY COUNCIL /a/ Rick Molfatell- City Administrator City of Monticello, Minnesota 1268f O RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152 to 469.165, TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR REFINANCING OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ON BEHALF OF CLOW LEASING AND CLOW STAMPING COMPANY, INC. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City'), as follows: 1. Authority. The City is, by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.165, as amended (the "Act"), authorized to issue and sell its revenue bonds and refunding revenue bonds for the purpose of financing and refinancing the cost of authorized projects and to enter into agreements necessary or convenient in the exercise of the powers granted by the Act. 2. Authorization of Proiect: Documents Presented. Clow Leasing, a Minnesota general partnership (the 'Borrower'), has proposed to this Council that the City issue and sell its $950,000 City of Monticello Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds (Clow Stamping Company Project), Series 1988, in substantially the form set forth in the hereinafter -mentioned Trust Indenture (the "Bonds') pursuant to the Act and loan the proceeds thereof to the Borrower in order to refund in full the City's outstanding Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Clow Stamping Co., Inc. Project), Series 1980 (the "Refunded Bonds"), and thereby refinance the costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping a manufacturing facility in the City, together with necessary site improvements (the 'Project'), owned by the Borrower and leased by the Borrower to Clow Stamping Company (formerly 'Clow Stamping Co., Inc.'), a Minnesota corporation (the 'Lessee"). Forms of the following documents relating to the Bonds have been submitted to the City and are now on file in the office of the City Administrator: (a) Loan Agreement (the 'Loan Agreement') dated as of April 1, 1988, between the City and the Borrower, whereby the City agrees to make a loan to the Borrower of the gross proceeds of sale of the Bonds and the Borrower agrees to refund the Refunded Bonds and to pay amounts in repayment of the loan sufficient to provide for the full and prompt payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds; and 0 (b) Trust Indenture (the 'Trust Indenture') dated as of April 1, 1988, between the City and National City Bank of Minneapolis, as Trustee, pledging revenues, including those to be derived from the Loan Agreement, as security for the Bonds, and setting forth proposed recitals, covenants and agreements relating thereto; and (c) Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement (the "Mortgage"), dated as of April 1, 1988, from the Borrower to the Trustee, by which the Borrower grants to the Trustee a mortgage lien on and security interest in the Mortgaged Property, as defined therein, as further security for the payment of the Bonds (this document not to be executed by the City); and (d) Assignment of Leases and Rents (the 'Assignment') dated as of April 1, 1988, from the Borrower and the Lessee to the Trustee, by which the assignors assign to the Trustee their interests in all leases and rents with respect to the Mortgaged Property; and (e) Guaranty Agreement (the 'Guaranty') dated as of April 1, 1988, from the Lessee, Everett L. Clow and Gladyce E. Clow (collectively the "Guarantors") to the Trustee, by which the Guarantors, jointly and severally, guarantee payment of all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds; and (f) Bond Purchase Agreement (the 'Bond Purchase Agreement'), among Cronin 6 Co., Inc., together with American Investors Group, Inc. (together the "Underwriter"), the Borrower and the City, providing for the purchase of the Bonds from the City by the Underwriter and setting the terms and conditions of purchase; and (g) Preliminary Offering Statement dated April 5, 1988, and form of final Offering Statement, including the Appendices thereto (together the 'Offering Statement'), describing the offering of the Bonds, and certain terms and provisions of the foregoing documents. 3. Findings. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) The Project, based upon information furnished by the Borrower, constitutes a project authorized by and described in Section 469.153, Subdivision 2a, of the Act. -2- O (b) The purpose of the Project has been and the effect thereof is and will be to promote the public welfare by: preventing the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; preventing economic deterioration; the development of sound industry and commerce to use the available resources of community, in order to retain the benefit of the community's existing investment in educational and public service facilities; halting the movement of talented, educated personnel to other areas and thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; and increasing the tax base of the City and the county and school district in which the Project is located. (c) The Project has been approved by the Department of Energy and Economic Development of the State of Minnesota (or its statutory predecessor) as tending to further the purposes and policies of the Act. (d) There is no litigation pending or, to the best of its knowledge, threatened against the City relating to the Project or to the Bonds, the Loan Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement or the Trust Indenture or questioning the organization, powers or authority of the City. (e) The execution, delivery and performance of the City's obligations under the Bonds, the Trust Indenture, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Loan Agreement do not and will not violate any charter provision or any order of any court or other agency of government of which the City is aware or in which the City is a party, or any indenture, agreement or other instrument to which the City is a party or by which it or any of its property is bound, or be in conflict with, result in a breach of, or constitute (with due notice or lapse of time or both) a default under any such indenture, agreement or other instrument. (f) It is desirable that the Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in the Trust Indenture, under the provisions of which the City's interest in the Loan Agreement will be pledged to the Trustee as security for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds. (g) The Loan Agreement provides for payments by the Borrower to the Trustee for the account of the City of such amounts as will be sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds when due. The Loan Agreement obligates the Borrower to pay or cause the Lessee to pay for all costs of operation and maintenance of the Project Facilities, including adequate insurance, taxes and special assessments. A reserve fund has been deemed necessary to be established under the provisions of the Indenture in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. (h) Under the provisions of the Act, and as provided in the Loan Agreement and Trust Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from nor charged upon any funds other than amounts payable pursuant to the Loan Agreement and moneys in the funds and accounts held by the Trustee which are pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not subject to any liability thereon; no holders of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel the exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay any of the bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City; the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City; and each Bond issued under the Trust Indenture shall recite that the Bond, including interest thereon, shall not constitute or give rise to a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of the City. 4. Approval and Execution of Documents. The forms of Loan Agreement, Trust Indenture, Bond Purchase Agreement, Mortgage, Assignment and Guaranty, referred to in paragraph 2, are approved. The Loan Agreement and Trust Indenture shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and the City Administrator, in substantially the form on file, but with all such changes therein, not inconsistent with the Act or other law, as may be approved by the officers executing the same, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution thereof, and then shall be delivered to the Trustee. The Bond Purchase Agreement shall be signed as provided therein. Copies of all documents shall be delivered and filed as provided therein. 5. Approval. Execution and Delivery of Bonds. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue the Bonds, to be dated April 1, 1988, in the aggregate principal amount of $950,000, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Trust Indenture, which terms are for this purpose incorporated in this resolution and made a part hereof. The Underwriter has agreed pursuant to the provisions of the Bond Purchase Agreement, and subject to the conditions therein set forth, to purchase the Bonds at the purchase price set forth in the Bond Purchase Agreement, and said purchase price is hereby found to be favorable and is hereby accepted. The Mayor and City Administrator are authorized and directed to prepare and execute the Bonds as prescribed in the Trust Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee, together with a certified copy of this Resolution and the other documents required by Section 2.08 of the Trust Indenture, for authentication, registration and delivery to the Underwriter. As provided in the Trust Indenture, each Bond shall contain a recital that it is issued pursuant to the Act, and such recital shall be conclusive evidence of the validity and regularity of the issuance thereof. 6. Offering Statement. The City hereby consents to the circulation by the underwriter of the Offering Statement in offering the Bonds for sale; provided, however, that the City has not participated in the preparation of the Offering Statement or independently verified the information in the Offering Statement and takes no responsibility for, and makes no representations or warranties as to, the accuracy or completeness of such information. 7. Certificates, At -r,. The Mayor, City Administrator, and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to bond counsel and the purchaser of the Bonds, when issued, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts appearing from the books and records in the officers' custody and cntrol or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute represesntations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. 9. Authorization. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to deliver a certified copy of this Bond Resolution to the County Auditor, together with such other information as such County Auditor may require, and obtain the certificate of the County Auditor as to entry of the Bonds on his bond register as required by the Act and Section 475.63, Minnesota Statutes. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Administrator of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the 'City'), do hereby certify that attached hereto is a compared, true and correct copy of a resolution giving final approval to an issuance of industrial development refunding revenue bonds by the City on behalf of Clow Leasing and Clow Stamping Company, duly adopted by the City Council of the City on April 25, 1988 at a regular meeting thereof duly called and held, as on file and of record in my office, which resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date thereof and which resolution is in full force and effect as of the date hereof, and that the attached Extract of Minutes as to the adoption of the resolution is a true and accurate account of the proceedings taken in passage thereof. WITNESS My hand and the seal of the City this _day of April, 1987. (Seal) 1389f City Administrator —6— O Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the �- City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota was duly held at City Hall in said City of Monticello, on the 25th day of April, 1988, at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following Council members were present: and the following were absent: The Mayor then announced that this was the time and place scheduled for a public hearing on the issuance of industrial development refunding revenue bonds of the City on behalf of Clow Leasing and Clow Stamping Company, as described in the notice of public hearing published in the April 7 edition of the City's official newspaper. The following persons appeared: After all persons who appearerd were afforded an opportunity to express their views with respect to the issuance of the bonds, the hearing was closed. 0 Council member then introduced the following written resolution and moved the adoption thereof: A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152 to 469.165, TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR REFINANCING OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ON BEHALF OF CLOW LEASING AND CLOW STAMPING COMPANY The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member , and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1788E v Council Agenda - 4/25/88 Consideration of Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for Streetscape Protect and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Since February 8 when the Council authorized Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban to prepare plans and specifications for this Streetscape Project, Mr. Geoff Martin, along with the City Engineer, has been preparing the final plans and specifications for the Streetscape Project. The Streetscape Project was scaled back from an original estimate of $640,000 to $405,000, and the project is proposed to be bid in two categories covering the general site construction and electrical work with a separate bid for the landscaping portion of the improvement. The third measure used to cut cost authorized the City to purchase the new street lights, waste receptacles, along with the tree grates and tree guards in an effort to reduce the sales tax and overhead usually charged by a general contractor. On Thursday morning, Mr. Martin met with staff members to review the nearly completed plans and specifications and presented a cost summary based on the revised design concept. The original project cost of $405,000 consisted of approximately $351,386 of actual construction cost, with the balance being a 10 percent contingency and all other indirect costs associated with an improvement project of this nature. In reviewing the final cost estimates based on the final plans and specifications, two parts of the project have come in at a higher estimate than originally planned for. Originally, the planner had estimated a cost of approximately $32,000 for the installation of ornamental street lights, including all the required trenching and wiring; and it is now estimated by the City Engineer that this cost will total nearly $80,000. The second item concerned the refurbishing and installation of approximately 330 feet of bridge railing panels that were going to be placed throughout the Streetscape project. The planner had estimated the cost of refurbishing at $150 per foot, which amounts to $30,000 more than originally planned on. if both of these items were to remain as estimated, the total construction cost base estimates would total $393,0007 but it is staff's intent, along with the planner, to still reduce this cost to approximately the $350,000 to $360,000 range. Staff feels confident this can be accomplished primarily by obtaining a lower cost for refurbishing the bridge panels and the bidding will delete this item from the contract, and the City will supply the panels to the contractor for installation. The proposed plans and specifications and bid documents will provide for a number of alternates that should enable the City to stay within its budgeted amount by adding or deleting certain aspects of the project as needed. Geoff Martin will present on Monday evening a cost summary bid sheet estimating all of the aspects of the project, including the alternates. Enclosed with the agenda is a summary of the major portions of the project and the estimated cost within our budget projections. -3- t Council Agenda - 4/25/88 In order to meet the project schedule of construction starting approximately July 5, the plans and specifications should be approved at Monday night's meeting to enable the project to be bid April 28 through May 17. The bids are projected to be returnable May 17 and awarded at a Council meeting May 23. During this same time period, the City will be soliciting bids for the tree grates and guards, lighting fixtures, and other items planned to be purchased by the City directly. If the project comes in at our estimated cost, the City would then be purchasing the materials approximately May 23 to enable the materials to be on hand for the first part of July construction. One major element of the project that will have to be addressed concerns the color the street lights and ornamental bridge railings should be painted. From a maintenance standpoint, the staff originally felt that the color black would be the easiest to maintain should touch-up painting be required. Another color recommended would be a dark green color for both the street lights and the ornamental railing. Although the project could be bid without a color specified, the Council may wish to indicate at this time their color choice, and Mr. Martin would be able to address the pro's and con's of any color selection. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Assuming there are no major corrections or changes needed to the plans presented, and the estimated cost is within budget, the resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizing advertising for bids should be adopted. 2. if there are major corrections or alterations to the plans which would require the project to be delayed, the resolution need not be adopted at this time. C. STAFF RCCMIE71DAT10N: As indicated previously, due to the time constraints necessary to advertise for bids and order the necessary street lights and tree grates, etc., it is reconanended that the plane be approved at Monday's meeting if this project is to continue on schedule this summer. The way the bids are being advertised and because of the number of alternates in the bide, the staff feels confident the project can come in within budget by adding or deletion of certain portions as needed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution and estimated cost summary of the project. -4- RESOLOTION 88- rO /j RESOLOTION APPROVING PLANS S SPECIFICATIONS ON STREZISCAPE PROJECT AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on February 8, 1988, the City Planner, Dahlgren, Shardlow, Oban & Associates, has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of Broadway, River, and Third Streets between Linn Street on the west to Palm Street on the east with curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscaping, and other appurtenant work associated with a downtown streetscape improvement, and has presented such plans and specifications to the Counc'.l for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file at City Hail, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the Monticello Times and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Administrator until on , 1988, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hail by the City Administrator and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 p.m. on , 1988, in the Council Chambers. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Administrator and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City of Monticello for 59 of the amount of such bid. 3. Springsted, Inc., is hereby designated the financial consultant for the financing of this public improvement. Adopted this 25th day of April, 1988. Mayor City Administrator 0 Monticello Streetscape 4-22-88 COSTS ESTIMATE SUMMARY MATERIALS SUPPLIED BY THE CITY Lights: $60,000.00 Grates w/Frames: Includes freight for guards 16,575.00 (Guards Alternate 1-6) Trash Receptacles: 3,235.00 Wood Benches 1,936.00 ALTERNATES Priority Alt. Total 04 • 1-1 Paint Stop Lights add $ 1,800.00 1-2 Parking Lot Islands Block 52 - Oty. 3 add 1,577.00 Block 34 - Oty. 1 1-8 Add Light to Perking' Lot 35 add 4,045.00 _ 03 1-3 Perking Lot 52 - Islands add 2,335.00 West Side 06 • 1-4 Sub - 12 concrete pedestals for 6 benches add 9,384.00 05 1-5 Parking Lot Signs add 4,050.00 02 • 1-6 Tree Guards - $95.00 ea. plus 40 ea. Install x 41 add 5,535.00 01 • 1-7 Additional Bridge Roiling 82.5 LF - $100.00 LF add 8,250.00 PROPOSAL 02 ALTERNATES 02 2-1 Shrubs In Islands add 2,460.00 03 2-2 Parking Lot Island Landscaping and Boulevard Trees Block 52 - Oty. 3 Block 34 - Oty. 3 add 7,875.00 01 2-3 Parking Lot 52 Islands add 1,323.00 West Side BASE BID 01 $206,475.00 BASE BID 02 31,260.00 City Supplied Items 61,746.00 Subtotal 319,480.00 5% Contingency 15,974.00 Budget Target Figuer ($333,400.00) $335,454.00 • First Priority Alternates 24,969.00 (1-1, 1-4, 1-6, 1.1) 360,423.00 Second Priority Alternates 23,665.00 (� $384,098.00 �l/ Monticello Streetacape PROPOSAL d1 GENERAL SITE CONSTRUCTION AND ELECTRICAL WORK MONTICELLO STRE£TSCAPE AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS MUN i IULLLU, rAINNLbU i A - City Council City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, Minnesota 55362-9245 The undersigned, being familiar with the local conditions effecting the cost of the work and with the Contract Documents, Including the Advertisement for Bids, Form of Proposal, General, Supplementary, and Special- Conditions, Drawings, Technical Specifications, and Addenda Numbers an file at the office of Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Ubon, Inc., 300 First Avenue North, Suite 210, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401, and In accordance with the provisions thereof, hereby proposes to fumish all labor, materials, and equipment necessary for. General Site Construction and Electrical Work for the Monticello Streetacape and Sidewalk Improvements The bidder agrees to furnish all labor, materials, and equipment necessary to complete work as described In the specifications and shown on the plans at the unit prices stated herein: Monticello Streetscape G/ SCHEDULE OF PRICES The quantities Indicated are for the convenience of the Bidder. it shall be the Bidder's responsibility to verify all quantities to their own satisfaction. { The Bidder must fill in the quantity verification, the unit orice in fiquresi and the totals for each item. For complete information concerning these items, - see the plans and specifications. Contractor Total Quantity Unit Item Description Quantity Verification Unit Price Amount A. Site Removals 1. Concrete yS�gSY SY We trove ^P-&jbo 2. Saw Cut & Remove SY P50 s Asphalt 46i_ SY IoIT 3. Remove Curb ty95i3• LF LFl y 32 .c font3ol Signe -A- Lump sum _ 5. Remove Stree�G �c� Lio - '2 ea. 6. ReAVO move Wood Bollards Parking Lot 35 36 lump sum �C06 l 7. Remove Sod, Shrubs and Rock Mulch 222 SY lump gum �% �_ ' na4'Al l'i r (rl,�pi�+�1 / �J B. Layout and Stokln i. Complete layout, stoking and setting grades of ff f�N� site Improvements S 1/a lump Gum 1 C. Earthwork 1. Excavate 18" total depth of sub -base & sub -grade CY CY . at parking islands 187 D. Site Construction 2. ' B-6-24 curb <i%3 LF -4-24 curb 146 LF 8 146 LF LF !!e �i � 8-6-12 curb Colt 9*r LF LF 2. Patch Bituminous ; '�a f Paving lump gum (f 3. Concrete Paving 20.020 SF 5F Monticello Streetacape Contractor Total Quantity Unit Item Description Quantity Verification Unit Price Amount 4. Exposed Aggregate gP1LL '._ Paving S P& SF SF s S 5. Install tree grates with frames supplied by owner 41 ca. "bdg�rrotgti 6. Refurbish ridge railing .supplied by owner 335.5 LF LF 7. Paint existing 16 ea. street lights E. Site Improvements 1. Install trash receptacles supplied ea. by owner 6 .&ldCV * 2. Install saiveged traffic lump 99 do control signs 9 sum 3. Manufacture and Install aecki. concrete pedestal o- G 21jo �f 'VW seats .G a,2' ea. � y�l"aurrlGt F. ELECTRICAL 1. Install street lights, ornamental supplied by Owner, to Include all wiring trenching� condulry -a oen"nelV L"J� 5004 .a+ 6> X010 %.pe-�rF}rctnras 4i --• TOTAL BASE BID: 9iD�i> Dollars $ .- ALTERNATE PROPOSALS ' Each bidder is required to bid on all alternate proposals. ALTERNATE 1310 01.1 Point stop lights and control boxes at intersection of Pine Street and Broadway Street to match decorative light tlxtUres. Add to the base bid the sum of Let" Dollars >$ LTERNATE BID AJwV 1-^6 Install new 30 foot pale and flood light ,In Parking Lot 35. Light to be supplied by Owner. Add to the base bid the cum of —_,OLd%, 40 Dollars 5 ._. Monticello Streetscape ALTERNATE BID 01.3 Remove concrete Islands and bituminous from the west side of the Block 52 parking lot. Construct new Islands with B-6-12 curb as shown on drawings. Add to the base bid the sum of Dollars $ X35. LZ ALTERNATE BID 01-4 94"!.��V2 G4id r bm# I L ga'acreTG 3,pinna of tha f.w_nl - Vedee ! �.dL t::. 3tlMer.3a_, "sL ±'S3 :3�a.±t �_: •-{+rP). J -DegddQt from the base bid the sum of Dollars �$ ALTERNATE BID 01.5 Manufacture six parking directional signs and Install as Indicated on drawings. Add to the base bid the sum of Dollars ALTERNATE BIO 01.6 Install forty-one tree guards supplied by owner. Manufacturer- Ironamith Model: M-10 Color. Bleck Mounting: Surface Mounted Add to the base bid the eum of Doilars $ 67' ALTERNATE BID 01.7 Refurbish and Install an additional 82.5 LF of bridge railing. Add to the base bid the sum of Dollars' S LU75m ALTERNATE .BIO 01-8 — �"�-1P PI Ai T i—Z i _ 8i1T@ N 131D'1IlA ---, .5 C7 Monticello Streetscape PROPOSAL 02 LANDSCAPE WORK MONTICELLO STREETSCAPE AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA City Council City of Monticello 250 East Broadway, Monticello, Minnesota 55362-9245 The undersigned, being familiar with the local conditions affecting the cost of the work and with the Contract Documents, including the Advertisement for Bids, Form of Proposal, General, Supplementary end Special Conditions, Drawings, Technical Specifications, and Addenda Numbers on file at the offices of Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, Inc., 300 First Avenue North, Suite 210, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401, and In as cordance with the provisions thereof, hereby proposes to furnish all labor, materials, and equipment necessary for: Monticello Streetecape and Sidewalk Improvements The bidder agrees to furnish all labor, materials, and equipment necessary to complete _ work as described In the specifications and shown on the plans at the unit prices stated herein* D V ' Monticello Streetscape SCHEDULE OF PRICES The- quantities indicated are for the convenience of the Bidder. It shall be the Bidder's responsibility to verify all quantities to their own satisfaction. rr The Bidder must fill in the quantity verification. the unit price In fioures; and 1_ the totals for each item. For complete information concerning these items, see the plans and specifications. Contractor Total Quantity Unit Item Description Quantity Verification Unit Price Amount A. Landscape 1. Add planting soil to parking lot Islands jW 10 Z. CY 2. Add topsoil to sod areas =jL CY1TG 3. Plant skyline locust 3" cal. B & 8 In tree wells 36 ea. "e ,4. Redmond Linden 3" cal. B h B A - ea. 3� s 5. Heckberry 3" cal. 8 h 8 2 ea. (per 6. Red Splendor Crab 2-1/2" cal. 8 & B 12 ea. Z .e 30 , 7. Ponderosa Pine 8' 8 6 B .fr eo. 10' 8 & B -Y Z on. � u B. Seo Green Juniper^ S gal. pot 34' eo. 9. Scandia Juniper 5 gal. pot 19 ea. fS 10. Green Ash Clump aT 8 ea. Z� Z750 — 2-1/2" cal -stem 8 & B 11. sjOSAMir A-bn 9 - - 62. 2'a-: ' 17-0— 1 L,.ai: Compact Euonymous 2' 11 es. Froebelo Spires 6 eo. ZL L 2' pot 14- W ' Sod 340 SY i. IS• e� MV ick 51 '3 SS Z�r l / TOTAL BASE BIDS 1.7� GD Oollars f'.' _ GO) 1 ........ -I zz ALTERNATE PROPOSALS Each bidder Is required to bid on all alternate proposals. ALTERNATE BID 02-1 Add shrubs at planting Islands In parking lots on Blocks 34 and 35. Size Type MY. Sea Green Juniper: 5 Gal. Pots 82 Add to the Base Bid the sum of: Dollars ALTERNATE 810 02-2 ft bte of a 1, 1ret1l.trees . m 3" caliper to 2-V2" caliper.. f f, I educt Cc t/ jh�. �to�hcu�� ALTERNATE BID a"Joif:— Add coil, trees, and shrubs to parking lot islands on west side of the parking on Block 52. Size jMe Qty - Green Ash Clump: 2-1/2" cal. B & 8 Sea Green Juniper 5 gal. pot 9 Soil 36 CY Add to the base bid the sum of: Dollars $ -spite- I&AII lift 14.1wiP, Cc ;07'o.mmif -A-4- '43 11 Ag � f5ow- 5)d rte ';K� of Council Agenda - 4/25/88 7. Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Setting the Sale of C.O. Improvement Bonds for Streetscape Project and County Road 39 East Projects. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: With the recent awarding of a contract for improvements to East County Road 39, along with the Dundas Circle improvements in the Oakwood Industrial Park, and the cost associated with well 13 and 14, the next step for the City is to proceed with the financing process and set the date for sale of General Obligation Bonds. Assuming the Streetscape Project was authorized to go out for bids, it is recommended that all of the above improvement projects be combined into one improvement bond issue to eliminate duplication of issuance cost. As a result, a bond issue totaling $1,540,000 has been recommended by the City's Bond Consultant, Springsted, Inc. This bond issue also includes an extra $127,500 for the completion of well g4 and related equipment. If it is determined by the Council that this additional well will not be pursued this year, the bond issue can be reduced accordingly. If the resolution is adopted setting the sale of G.O. Bonds, the bids would be returnable Monday, May 23, and would be presented to the Council that evening for their approval. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Presuming the Streetscape Project is to continue on schedule and the addition of well t4 is to be constructed yet this year, the resolution authorizing the sale of C.O. Bonds can be adopted. 2. The only other alternative is to adopt the resolution at a lower bond sale amount if portions of the projects are deleted from consideration this year. C. STAFF REC"ENDATION: It is the staff's recommendation that the resolution be adopted authorizing the sale of the improvement bonds, as currently this is the only method available to finance the projects already started. Again, if well 14 or the Streetscape Project changes, the bond amount can also likewise be amended. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Recommendations from Springsted, Inc., on the bond sales A copy of the resolution setting the sale. The resolution is being provided by the City's legal counsel, Holmes and Craven, Inc.1 and if it is not available by Friday, it will be presented at Monday night's meeting. —5- t RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TK CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA $1,544„ Wo GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988A Study No. 3779 April 20619M SPRIMOTED boorparated 0 SPRINGSTED PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS 85 C-1 S--•P'n' Su 100 S."I F4m V—:"oln 55101 2u9 61? -??33000 FA, u12?^3 :flq? April 2l, 1988 Mayor Ar ve G r i nn sno Members, City Council Mr. Rick Wolfsteller, Administrator City Hall 250 East Broadway, Box 83A Monticello, MN 55362 RE: $1,540,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1988A We respectfully request your consideration of our recommendations for the issuance of these bonds. Proceeds of the bond issue will be used to finance two improvement projects currently underway within the City. The major cost is associated with improvement project 088-1 which finances several water and miscellaneous other improvement costs for the City. The second project is the streetscape project. The bond issue consists of the following components: l I. #88.1 - UTILITIES (A) Trunk watermain, sewer, lift station, storm sewer improvements along E. Co. Rd. 39, 118, and 75. Sanitary Sewer $ 1 10,147 W atermain 199,462 Lift Station 50,401 Storm Sewer and Appurtenant 107.368 Subtotal $ 467,378 (B) Wel 1 d3 and Pumphouse Well 03 $ 72,750 Pumphouse and Equipment 156.000 Subtotal $ 228,750 (C) Well 14 and Equipment Well 04 $ 35,000 Pump and Controls 30.000 W atermain 3S.000 C Subtotal $ 100,8 p Iia❑nn C)", rr wl-: :—(m„"r `` I"4 M ,1 Nr:.In I::.1vrs':ur.nS n1'1n I'M C:.r(Irro Pr11' :r 101 r Y�1 Itera-111.) 114.N' 4Q04 1442 L 1 (irk:r+ V:.:. CLI: 5111: -0O�7 511 ;' , / ;4i 1,, ala 101 e.'.: 10, 311 211 ;U>;li 1.. 414 rll: 79)4 .L City of Monticello, Minnesota April 20, 1988 (D) Dundas Circle - sewer, water, street improvements Subtotal $ 55.046 Total Construction $ qtr /l0, Indirect Costs (27%) 229.817 /Z, u�(. Total Project #88-1 Costs $1,080,991 //L( 6� V 2. #88.2 - STREETSCAPE Project Costs $ 333,400 Contingency (10%) 33,400 Engineering (16%) 58, 675 Administration (2%) 7,300 Issuance (1-1/2%) 5.000 Total #88.2 Project Costs $ 437,775 Subtotal Costs $1,518,766 1& 39J Add: Bond Discount 23. 100 ,3, Subtotal $1,541,866 _l 1a Less: Investment Earnings (1,866) � DO Net Bond Issue $1.540.000 7 i Of the total project costs approximately $385,000 will be assessed against benefited property over a term of 15 years with interest rates at 1.50% over the interest rate on the bonds. We are estimating this will be 8.5%. The assessment income, as projected, is shown in Appendix 11 of these recommendot ions. The structure of the bond issue is shown in Appendix I of these recommendations. The first levy for the bonds will be made in 1988 for collection in 1989. The first principal on the bonds will fall due on February 1, 1990 and annually thereafter through 2004. The interest rates shown in Column 5 represent current market rates as of April 19 and may vary somewhat from the rotes actually received at the time of sale. Any adjustments up or down will alter the net required levy for the City. The total debt service on the bonds is shown in Column 6, and Column 7 reflects the mandatory 5% overlevy that Minnesota Statutes require in order to protect the City and the bondholders in the event all of the taxes are not paid as scheduled. Column 8 is the projected income as developed in Appendix 11. Column 9 is the annual tax levy required to support the bond issue. We have been advised that the City will assess 100% of the Dundas Circle costs which amount to $69,900, and $226,200 against the remaining utilities in project 088-I. Not included in these numbers Is $91,000 of assessments which will also be filed at this time, however, it is anticipated that those assessments will qualify for Green Acres and therefore have not been anticipated in the cash flow for repayment of the bonds. To the extent that these properties lose their Green Acres status, additional income will be available to reduce future tax levies for these bonds. The streetscope project Page 2 City of Monticello, Minnesota April 20, 1988 will be ossessed 20% against benefited property and the remaining portion to be paid by tax levies. The City will again need a rating from Moodys Investors Service, Inc. for this issue. The City is currently rated "A" by Moody's and we do not anticipate any change in this excellent rating. The rating agency will charge a fee of approximately $3,000 for the rating. The bonds will be dated June I, 1988 and mature on February I, 1990 through 2004. Bonds maturing in the years 1997 through 2004 representing $970,000, or 63% of the issue, will be callable as early as February 1, 19% without penalty. This will provide the City with an opportunity to refinance these bonds at a future date if market conditions so warrant. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 contains restrictions to the issuance of tax-exempt bonds. Basically, municipalities must now report and rebate any arbitrage earnings received from the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds. There is an exemption to this requirement for municipalities that issue less than $5,000,000 of tax-exempt bonds in a calendar year. It is our understanding the City does not anticipate issuing $5,000,000 of tax-exempt bonds during 1988, and therefore is exempt from the reporting and rebate requirements. Also, since the City will issue less than $10,000,000 of tax-exempt bonds during 1988, it can designate the bonds as "qualified bonds" under the act, making them more marketable to financial institutions. We are recommending the bonds be offered for sale on Monday, May 23, 1988, with bids to be received in the o!fices of Springsted Incorporated at 12:00 Noon. The bids will be opened and tabulated at that time and then presented to the Council for award that evening at your regular meeting. Proceeds of the Issue will be available to the City approximately 30 days later or in late June. Respectfully submit esspectfulllysubbmit ted, SPRINGSTEIncorporated tkf Page 3 City of Monticello. Minnesota Prepared April 19, 1968 11.540.000 6.0. liproveeent Bonds. Series 19MA By SPRIMGSTtD Incorporated Dated: 6- 1.1986 Nature: 2. 1 total Projected lots Year of Year of principal 10S1 Assessment Ret Levy Not. Princ tool Rates Interest At Interest of Total Incase Reguiramtit ill (2) 13) 14) (5) 16) 17) tai 19) 18e8 1990 25,000 5.101 166.683 193,463 203.151 66.640 136.511 1989 1991 65,000 S.301 99.815 161,815 194.056 56.211 131.64$ 1990 1982 65,000 5.50111, 95.310 180,310 109.325 54.029 135.291 1993 1993 90.000 5.101 90,635 190.615 189.687 51.647 131,620 1992 1m 90.000 5.901 85.505 175.505 104,280 49,665 134.615 1993 1995 95.000 6.10111 80,195 ITS, IRS 183.955 47,461 136.471 1994 1996 100.000 6.101 14,400 114,400 163.120 45,1102 131.610 1995 1"1 105.000 6.508 68,100 1n. too 181.755 43.120 138.615 1996 1996 105.000 6.654 81.21s 166,275 174.569 40.436 133.651 1997 1999 110.600 6.11031 54.293 164,293 372.508 36.756 133.752 1908 2000 115,000 6.951 46.613 151.813 169,904 36.576 113.326 1999 2002 125,000 7.101 36,820 183,020 112.011 34,394 131.617 2000 2002 120.000 7.201 19,94S 159,945 167,942 32,212 t3S.130 pool 2003 135.000 1.3011 10,5e5 165.695 163.384 30,010 133.134 2002 2004 145.000 7.101 to. 730 155.730 163.517 17,643 135.671 lotus: 1.540,000 1,024,904 2.564,904 P.693.15t 655,011 1.038.104 Bond Years: 11.961.67 Annual interest; 1.021,904 Avg. Notunly; 9.72 Plus oteceunt: 11.100 A.R. Annual Rate: 6.6503 Not Interest; 1.040.004 M.I.C. Rate: 1.0051 Interest rates are set Testes: changes say cause aignif scant olterat toms of this utiedule. IM actual undi iters discount bid way also wary. O � O City of flonttce110. Mlmewte 61,540,000 G.O. IMproremnt Bonds. Series 1968A Filing Collect Year Tet* 1968 1989 1089 1990 1990 t091 1991 7902 loot tool 1993 1994 1924 1995 1905 1990 t998 )907 1997 1000 t988 1999 1999 toxo FOOD tool 1001 too? ?007 2003 WIN S 5 PROJECTED ASSESSMENT INCOME 080.1 - Utilities Flilrap Date: 10/ 1/1980 Interest Print ipe1 0 8.50011 total 19.140 31,5126 51,152 19,140 23,491 43.231 19,140 21,813 41,553 19,740 20,135 39,675 19./40 18,451 38,197 19.140 15,119 35,519 19,140 IS.t41 34.841 19,140 13.423 33.163 19,140 111145 31,485 19,140 10.061 29,907 19.140 8,390 28.110 19.140 6.112 26,452 19,140 s,034 24,774 19.140 31356 21.096 19,140 1.678 21,416 ?96,100 201,693 503.793 888.2 Strartscape 40.913 FIIing pate: 10/ 1/1996 fS,86t Interest 56,111 Principe 9 6.5006 total 5327 9,4616 IS,388 5,927 1.053 it.980 5.927 6,549 12,476 5,927 6,045 11.971 S,027 S.S41 11.468 51027 6,038 10.965 5.927 4,534 10.451 5.927 4.030 0.951 5,917 3.526 9.453 5.917 3,022 812411 5.117 1.St0 6.110 5.027 ),015 1,242 5,927 1,511 1.438 5.917 1,007 6.934 5,012 503 6,425 88,900 67,354 IS1.254 a) Inc l,s4oa IM erect Iris f ting 6l Includes Interest fret fittnp date to It/31/1989. date to 11/31/1969. Prepared April 19, 1988 By SPRINGSIED Incorporated ----101 Al---.- Princ1965 Interest tots) 15.661 40.913 60.640 fS,86t 30.544 56,111 15.681 ;9,342 54,029 !6.667 td, 190 $1.24/ 25,667 73.496 49.665 15.961 !1,011 47.484 15,867 !9.635 45.302 25.661 11.457 43.120 15.867 IS1171 40.938 t5.867 Is,OBO 30,156 16.657 10,909 36.576 16.661 6,727 34.394 tS. 667 6,545 12.112 75.667 4,363 30.030 ?51660 1.101 21.643 385.000 170.041 655.047 i OFFICIAL TERMS OF OFFERING $1,540.000 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988A Sealed bids for the Bonds will be opened by the City on Monday, May 23, 1988, at 12:00 Noon, Central Time, at the offices of SPRINGSTED Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-2143. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:30 P.M., Central Time, of the some day. DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated June I, 1988, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February I and August I of each year, commencing August 1, 1989. Interest will be computed upon the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months and will be rounded pursuant to rules of the MSRB. The Bonds will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof as requested by the Purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will be payable of the main corporate office of the Registrar and interest on each Bond will be payable by check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at his address as it appears on the books of the Registrar as of the 15th day of the calendar month next preceding the interest payment. The Bonds wil I mature February I in the amounts and years as follows: J25,000 1990 000 1995 110,000 1999 130,000 2002 85,000 199 1 .1 9CP2 J109,0:000 1996 1150 2000 1 000 2003 90,000 1993-1994 105,000 1997.1998 125,000 2001 il45,00002004 OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The City may elect on February I, 1996, and on any interest payment date thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 1997. Redemption may be in whole or in port of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, those Bonds remaining unpaid which have the latest maturity dote will be prepaid first. If only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment the specific Bonds to be prepaid will be chosen by lot by the Registrar. All prepayments shall be at a price of par and accrued Interest. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge special assessments against benefitted property. The proceeds will be used to finance various improvements within the City. TYPE OF BID A sealed bid for not less than $1,516,900 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds shall be filed with the undersigned prior to the time set for the opening of bids. Also prior to the time set for bid opening, a certified or cashier's check in the amount of 515.400, payable to the order of the City, shall have been filed with the undersigned or SPRINGSTED Incorporated, the City's ` Financial Advisor. No bid will be considered for which sold check has not been filed. The check of the Purchaser will be retained by the City as liquidated damages In the event the Purchaser fails to Page 6 comply with the accepted bid. The City will deposit the check of the Purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement. No bid shalt be withdrawn after the time set for opening bids unless the meeting of the City scheduled for consideration of the bids is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been mode. Rates offered by Bidders shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1 /8 of 1%. No rate specified for a maturity shalt exceed the rate specified for any subsequent maturity. Bonds of the some maturity shall bear a single rote from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded to the Bidder offering the lowest dollar interest cost to be determined by the deduction of the premium, if any, from, or the addition of any amount less than par, to the total dollor interest on the Bonds from their dote to their final scheduled moturity. The City's computation of the total net dollar interest cost of each bid, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to. (i) waive non -substantive informolities of any bid or of matters relating to the receipt of bids and award of the Bonds, 00 reject all bids without cause, and, (iii) reject any bid which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. REGISTRAR The City will name the Registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the Registrar. CUSiP NUMBERS O if the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the Purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the Purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the dote of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the Purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the Purchaser. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the Purchaser of on approving legal opinion of Holmes S Graven, Chartered of Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be printed on the Bonds, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificote. On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City, or its designee, not toter than 100 P.M., Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the Purchoser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the Purchoser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. OFFICIAL STATEMENT Underwriters may obtain a copy of the Official Statement by request to the City's Financial Advisor prior to the bid opening. The Purchaser will be provided with 25 copies of the Official Statement. Dated April 25, 1988 BY ORDER OF THE CiTY COUNCIL /s/ Rick Woifsteiler Administrator Page 7 arWim M. Chak C A—y ■ Des+ DSI (612) 3V 92D HOILNIES & GRAVEN ChurrERM e30 HDWe7 Ca.. Meeeepds M- 33 DW IM21 337-M Re: $1.540.000 GENERAL OBUGA770N IMPROVEMENT BONDS. SER03S 1988A Dear Mr. Eidem: Enclosed please find a form of resolution providing for public sale of the above issue. Please give me a call If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. Very truly yours, © almine M. Chale CMC/rs Enclosure ccs Ms. Nancy Langness C CERTIFICATION OF MINI M Municipality: City of Monticello, Minnesota Governing body: City Council Meeting: A meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota held on the 25th day of April, 1988, at p.m. at the City Nall In the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Members present: Members absent: Documents: A copy of a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello at said meeting. Certification: : 4 Tom Eldem, Administrator of the City of Monticello do hereby certify the following: Attached hereto Is a true and correct copy of a resolution on file and of record In the offices of the City of Monticello, which resolution was adopted by the City Council, at the meeting referred to above. Said meeting was a meeting of the City Council, was open to the public, and was held at the time and place at which meetings of the City Council are regularly held. Member moved the adoption of the attached resolution. The motion for adoption of the attached resolution was seconded by Member . A vote being taken on the motion, the following voted In favor of the resolutions and the following voted against the resolutions 0 Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. The attached resolution is in full force and effect and no action has been taken by the City Council of the City of Monticello which would In any way alter or amend the attached resolution. Witness my hand officially as the City Administrator of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, this day of , 1988. City Administrator CETT OF NOWnCELLO, MINNESOTA "r RESOLUTION NUMBER RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF $1,540,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988A OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "Issuer"), as follows: 1. Bond Purpose and Authorization Sale. e. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and 475, the issuer Is authorized to Issue bonds for the purposes of providing funds to finance certain improvements (the "Improvements") undertaken by the issuer pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. b. It Is hereby found, determined and declared that (1) the Issuance of the Series 1988A Bonds Is necessary and desireable to provide funds to finance costa of improvements In the City; and 00 to provide for issuance costs thereof; and that the issuer should issue, and the issuer hereby authorizes and directs the issuance and sale of, its General Obligation improvement Bonds, Series 1998A In the aggregate principal amount of $1,540,000, (the "Bonds"). 2. Sale. This Board shall meet at the time and place specified In the forms of OfficfeTNotlee of Bond Sale for the Bonds attached hereto as Exhibit A for the purpose of opening and considering sealed bids for, and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 9. Notice of Bond Sale. Tire Board hereby authorizes, ratifies and confirms the publication of notice of advertisement for sealed bids for the Bonds in the official newspaper of the City, and In Commercial West, at Minneapolis, Minnesota, in substantially the forms attached hereto as Exhibit R. Each and fill of the terms and provisions set forth in such notice are adopted and confirmed as the terms and conditions of the Bonds and the sale thereof. 4. Official Terms of Offering. The Official Terme of Offering of the Bonds In substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B shall constitute the terms and conditions for the sale of the Bonds, and the Board hereby authorizes the incorporation of such terms and conditions In the material to be distributed to prospective bidders for the Bonds. Information and bidding forma may be obtained from the undersigned or from Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, St. Paul, CMinnesota 55101-2119= telephone: 812-225-9000, financial consultants to the County. Dated this 25th day of April, 1988. Attest: L EXHIBIT A OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE City of 8lostieello, Minnesota $1,540,000 General Obligation Improvement Bon 1a series 1988& NOTICE 19 HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids for the purchase of $1,540,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1988A (hereinafter referred to as the "Bonds") of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "Issuer") will be received until 12:00 noon, Central Time, on the 23rd day of May, 1988, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-2143, at which time any bids received will be opened and tabulated. Bids of not less than $1,518,900 and accrued interest on the Bonds will be accepted. The bids will be considered and acted upon by the City Council (the "Council") at a meeting of the Council at 7:30 p.m., Central Time, of the same day. The Bonds will be issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475 and 429, for the purpose of financing certain Improvements within the City. The Bonds will be issued as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000, or any Integral multiples thereof as requested by the Purchaser, will be dated dune 1, 1988, and will mature serially on February 1 in the following years and amounts: Year Amount Year Amount 1990 25t000 1998 105,000 1991 85,000 1.999 110,000 1992 85,000 2000 115,000 1993 90,000 2001 125,000 1994 90,000 2002 130,000 1995 95,000 2003 135,000 1998 100,000 2004 145,000 1997 105,000 Interest will be payable on each February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 1989. The Bonds maturing on or after February 1, 1997. will be subject to redemption and prepayment on February 1, 1998, and any Interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to par plus accrued Interest. An approving legal opinion for the Bonds will be furnished by Holmes Q Graven, Chartered, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Copies of the detailed Official IL Terms of Offering and additional Information for the Bonds may be obtained from the undersigned or from the financial consultants of the Issuer: SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2145 Telephone: (812) 229-5000 Dated: I Date of Publication] BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA BY C EXHIBIT B OFFICIAL TERMS OF OFFERING $1,540,000 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988A Sealed bids for the Bonds will be opened by the City on Monday, May 23, 1988, at 12:00 Noon, Central Time, at the offices of SPRINGSTED Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-2143. Consideration for award of the Bonds will ise by the City Council at 1:30 P.M., Central Time, of the some day. DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated June I, 1988, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February I and August I of each year, commencing August I, 1989. Interest will be computed upon the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months and will be rounded pursuant to rules of the MSRB. The Bonds will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof as requested by the Purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will be payable at the main corporate office of the Registrar and interest on each Bond will be payable by check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at his address as it appears on the books of the Registrar as of the 15th day of the calendar month next preceding the interest payment. The Bonds will mature February I in the amounts and years as follows: 1999 130,000 2002 85,000 1991-19512 110'S: 0,000 1996 115000 135,000 2003 90,00 1993-1994 105,000 1997-1998 1125,,000000 2001 1145,000 2004 OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The City may elect on February I, 1996, and on any interest payment date thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or atter February I, 1997. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, those Bonds remaining unpaid which have the latest maturity date will be prepaid first. 11 only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment the specific Bonds to be prepaid will be chosen by lot by the Registrar. All prepayments shall be at a price of par and accrued interest. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge special assessments against benefitted property. The proceeds will be used to finance various improvements within the City. TYPE OF BID A sealed bid for not less than $1,516,90 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds shall be filed with the undersigned prior to the time set for the open) of bids. Also prior to the time set for bid opening, a certified or cashier's check in the amount of $IS,400, payable to the order of the City, shall have been filed with the undersigned or SPRINGSTED Incorporated, the City's Financial Advisor. No bid will be considered for which sold check has not been filed. The check of the Purchaser will be retained by the City as liquidated damages In the event the Purchaser foils to comply with the accepted bid. The City will deposit the check of the Purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement. No bid shall be withdrawn offer the time set for opening bids unless the meeting of the City scheduled for consideration of the bids is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates offered by Bidders shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. No rate specified for a maturity shall exceed the rate specified for any subsequent maturity. Bonds of the some maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded to the Bidder offering the lowest dollar interest cost to be determined by the deduction of the premium, if any, from, or the addition of any amount less than par, to the total dollar interest on the Bonds from their date to their final scheduled maturity. The City's computation of the total net dollar interest cost of each bid, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any bid or of matters relating to the receipt of bids and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all bids without cause, and, (iii) reject any bid which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. REGISTRAR The City will name the Registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the Registrar. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the Purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the Purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 60 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the Purchaser of a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the Purchaser. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the Purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Holmes b Graven, Chartered of Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be printed on the Bonds, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City, or its designee, not later than 1:00 P.M., Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the Purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the Purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. OFFICIAL STATEMENT Underwriters may obtain a copy of the Official Statement by request to the City's Financial Advisor prior to the bid opening. The Purchaser will be provided with 25 copies of the Official Statement. Dated April 25, 1988 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /t/ Rid, W" Ifsteller Acme- strotor Council Agenda - 4/25/88 8. Consideration of variance Appeal to Allow a Loading Berth to be Constructed in the Public Right-of-way Setback Requirement - Applicant, Automatic Garage Door Company. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Automatic Garage Door Company, as noted in the enclosed site plan, is proposing an expansion of their existing building. With the proposed expansion of the building, the loading/unloading area, which is now done on the south side of their building, will be redirected to the east side of their proposed building addition. With the redirection of their loading/unloading area to the east side of the proposed building addition, a semi -truck tractor will have to drive out onto our public right-of-way (Cedar Street) to get backed up to the unloading dock. The applicant is proposing to be allowed to have the semi -truck tractor enter from the northeast driveway, come through their parking lot, and come out of their southeast driveway out onto the public right-of-way of south Cedar Street, and then back up to the loading dock on the proposed new building addition. City staff encourages each of the City Council members to drive out to the site to look at the problems the existing site has with the existing building elevation in relationship to south Cedar Street. The building was constructed to be above the existing Highwy 25, but below the existing south Cedar Street. With it being allowed to be built that way, we have problems with surface water drainage coming at a very fast pace against the curb adjacent to the existing building. All this water runoff is directed to South Highway 25 on the south side of their existing building near the existing loading/unloading dock area. We, as the City staff, have a definite concern with the truck tractor being allowed to enter into the public right-of-way to back up to the loading dock area. When the truck tractor and trailer Is backed up to the loading dock area, the tractor will be parked approximately 12-13 feet onto the boulevard portion of the Cedar Street public right-of-way. We feel that there are still possibly two, maybe three, other ways to accommodate the loading/unloading in a different situation within this property. The first situation would be that a portion of the building addition would be utilized as the unloading dock area where the semi -truck tractor would be backed into a portion of the building to accommodate its loading/unloading of the semi -trailer. By backing the trailer into a portion of the building addition, it would he on Ito own property and not on the City public right-of-way. But also to accommodate this meaner the semi -truck tractor still must drive out onto the Cedar Street public right-of-way to back up to the loading/unloading dock. The second situation would be to construct a building addition onto the southeast corner of the building to accommodate an unloading dock area. With this addition, the semi -truck tractor could enter from the southeast driveway, come up into the parking lot, and then back up to the loading dock and still be on private property to accommodate the maneuvering to the loading/un loading dock area. In the second situation we recognize -G- Council Agenda - 4/25/88 that there may be some problems with construction of this building addition in regards to the elevations which exist of the driveway portion that is currently used to get back to the existing loading/unloading area. We also recognize that this is probably the more expensive way to do it; but in reality, there would not need to be any variances to accomplish this. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the variance request to allow a loading berth to be constructed within the public right-of-way setback requirement. 2. Deny the variance request to allow a loading berth to be constructed in the public right-of-way setback requirement. C. STAFF REMMMENDATION: This is a very difficult recommendation to make as City staff members in that we do not want to discourage expansion of an existing business, but we also do not want to create a situation with which we may have a problem at some point in time in the future. We do, however, believe that there are two other alternatives to the construction of this building addition for the loading/unloading area which may or may not need a variance request. We also recognize that the building was allowed to be constructed in the location that it is and that the owners of this building have to work with the existing conditions to accommodate their proposed addition. We have other loading/unloading facilities at other industrial buildings in the City where they are currently allowed to use the public right-of-way to maneuver the semi -truck tractor trailers up to the loading/unloading dock areas. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the location of the proposed variance request; Copy of the site plan for the proposed variance request; Copy of the two alternatives for the proposed variance request, Copy of the ordinance section on loading berths. .7- ��r�LL1l�'f / f �� i iC. �� j,6. .� ./ �Q•✓` �.%ro ~ \},� t"t(•L,.(j;+fj': t-�:t "+.1.((f ��''��'����17777C � . t � . � r j ,1 1 j'�,�,� • 1. f + a [. 11 /] •� y t t�/�'t . . �.�,j_ 57 �•t io t t•t � ` �a�� '•� MtGHWAY ....# q&ci&nbctI+ co tv► - 4 s•T • iQ�i C ci�t�ot �•�y. N0. 84 ;�a 11 ��tt• • flp01 C ..' :`%� • ' � sic �= tia Gac•6 �� : � `�'�r:e? t , 1 A� 14710 GARAGE DOOR COMPANY t280 CEDAR STREET I MONTICELLO, MN 55382 PHONE: (410 2l"M or 140"0744 April 14, 1988 City of Monticello 250 E. Broadway Monticello, Minn. 55362 Members of the City Council: Automatic Garage Door Company wishes to make a formal appeal on the decision not to grant a variance by the Monticello Planning Commission, at the Tuesday meeting on 4-12-88. The variance request was to allow semi -tractors to sit on the public right-of-way set back while backed into an unloading pit, to be constructed at the south end of Automatic Garage Doors existing parking lot. GT/lo Sincerely Greg✓iobias Branch Manager 2 3ZOO W +o \ r `—PFL)Po'J rD ADVIT10N _,.—.._. .... ... 8%ISTttJG 6lDiNG.ON . (0 —_ 6t K �i�• \ i0 X15 Q� \ r PA,jr,,, CUn6 ARBA ` \•w CiJgH '14 _ 237.Oo _. �•\ /j _ 960 ,.. �• l W q6a W_ a_ gyp, �.... PRoposro AmrioW ~_ •Gdx7r, P`XISTIN1i BLDIN6a .• \ Gem ISO' r �JPA t .._---RgA CLRB � ., r .I `•..952 i 277 od r,�,D made 1 i r.i 1 237.40 __ -�• � 4 _ 960 ✓ � ! w— • 1 O` Fx_ \ tST1N4 BIUtNG, 41 84'x941 ti aox 150' PAr�Ktnj ew s�IN a ARCA ! tune \\ 0—PRO FOS 130 CV0.8 - 1 V 2770 iy � , Council Agenda - 4/25/88 9. Consideration of Concession Building Costs and Authorization to Proceed - NSP Softball Fields. (J.S.) / A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the last meeting, the City Council authorized the installation of footings and foundation block for the concession stand/restroom. We have completed the footings, excavation, water and sewer service installation, and the foundation block is expected to be completed prior to Monday evening's meeting. Total cost of this section is $2,823.42. We have ordered the exterior 8 -inch burnished block from Amcon Block in St. Cloud at a cost of $3,053.64. This block should be delivered sometime during the week of April 25. We completed the plans and specifications and requested proposals from various contractors and suppliers for materials for the remaining portions of the building. Those proposals were due at 2:00 p.m., Friday, April 22. The following is a tabulation of all to date costs and expected costa to complete the proposed building based upon those proposals. SOFTBALL CONCESSION STAND/RES1'ROOMIS I. Work to be Completed as of 4/25/88 1. Foundation block 6 labor (to be completed) $ 1,200.00 2. Footings (materials) 957.17 3. Excavation 390.00 4. water 6 sewer services (materials only) 276.25 5 2,823.42 II. Materials Ordered as of 4/25/88 1. Exterior 8" burnished block 5 3,053.64 III.Total Expenditures as of 4/25/68 $ 5,877.06 IV. Materials Yet to be Ordered 1. 6" burnished interior block 6 1,999.12 2. Rebar 6 reinforcement for walls 169.50 3. Concrete floor 6 wire 770.00 4. Roof, ceiling, doors 6 windows (Country Lumber Becker) 41703.60 5. Electrical materials 1,700.00 6. Sealers, paint 6 caulk 500.00 7. 6' sidewalk (not prev. included) 660.00 8. Countertop material 200.00 TOTAL MATERIAL $1U,702.22 -e- C Council Agenda - 4/25/88 V. Contract Labor and Labor/Material 1. Burnished block work (labor)(Paul Hoglund) $ 3,950.00 2. Roof construction (labor) (Dale Veches) 1,950.00 3. Plumbing (labor 6 material) (The Plumbery) 6,574.00 4. Electrical inspection 75.00 5. Total contracted cost $12,549.00 VI. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $29.126.1 jai y 2 L �e Based upon the above data, one can see that the building cost is slightly less than the original projection of $29,334.82 as presented in your March 28, 1988 agenda packet. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to complete the construction of the concession stand restroom this year at the above anticipated cost. 2. The second alternative would be to delay construction of the facility until next year. I cannot guarantee that we will receive better prices next year. C. STAFF RECOMMEMATION: It is the recommendation of the Public works Director and Parke Superintendent that the City Council proceed with the construction this year. Our estimates were $206.54 over the actual proposal prices. However, it is likely that something will overrun, so $30,000 may still be a good final figure; and we should be able to stay under that. D. SUPPORTING DATA: puotes from various supplier a. -9- AMCON Burnished Block - lasting beauty to enhance your construction project while utilizing CONCRETE BLOCK - the only construction material with natural built-in qualities of Sound Reduction, Fire Resistance, Energy Storage and Structural Strength. Regular concrete blocks are face ground at our plant using fully automatic equipment designed by 3M. The surface grinding exposes the color of the natural aggregate used. Substitution of aggre- gates or addition of cement coloring to the block mixture in the manufacturing process will customize your individual construction project. Available in all sues of block in a full range of scored patterns. AM - COLOR' Selections include Natural Gray. Brown. Adobe. Buff and Chocolate. Aggregate selection unlimited but subject to freight charges. AMCON has constant manufacturing controls to insure quality block are being produced. The curing system being used is a Besser Cure -Trot with Programmable Controller. Steam is controlled during the pre-set cycle and is injected and controlled to more than one kiln at a time with each kiln operating at precise pre-set times. cure temperatures, temperature rises, hold times and soak periods. The result is uniformity in color and strength of all blocks produced. Minor defects incidental to the usual method of manufacture, or minor chipping resulting from customary methods of handling in shipment• delivery and placement of blocks shall not be grounds for rejection except that not more than 5 percent of a shipment shall contain chips larger than tf. inch from any edge or comer on the faces. Our modem facility Is lasted in Central Min- nesota just minutes from St. Cloud, Minnesota. We stand ready to meet the demand for beautiful, Innovative and cost effective masonry construction. SPECIFICATIONr PERFORMANCE: Masonry Units shall conform to ASTM C90-75, Grade N, Type 1. WEIGHT: Manufactured in normal weight aggregates to meet ASTM C-33. -- i a " 0 o s CURING: Masonry units cured by low' pressure steam to temperatures of 170°F with controlled periods of pre- c. o set, steam and soak cycles. TOLERANCE: Each ground face shall ; o maintain a tolerance of plus or minus' _ s 1/16 Inch. " APPEARANCE: Color, surface texture.; ° m o a and aggregate exposure shall be uni- form. d o.°° ro Q a ^ FINISH: All ground faces shall be coated wi a dear, unpigmente coat• Ing to facilitate on the job cleandown. PROTECTION: Units shall be de- livered to the jobsite packaged In a manner so as to prevent damage to . the faces in shipment. O ® AMCON BLOCK & PRECAST, INC. 2200 South Highway 10. P.O. Box 506 Si. Cloud. MN 56302 ",�": 9 614.25 t •6050 MN WATTS t •800.624• l ] /! 1614 r yn�. N lc ��c �,� 7 L-.�rt �.ib IG�ii• i6 So b',L�� B F �. ib lal fJ 8 io� rCe� 6 �F�i r al X) 4-4 ,-.,_ - i F t-4 1!5'0,ko 4&4 ;2o97.8% 40duiu- ;� &., V. -O -J, 5o2.40 G %r ✓/t' � � G� carr ��r: 7tF f u W -A tar-' 2 4y 2b 8 �.Aa� #Voir IDU -ro r AIr F: I �.Aa� 9 Proposal "" No. of °wf ratarN m w.mm Yw.mr y Wrr r aararr. Ili ams nrr.. au,amfyma - Route 2 ss�oz "PLUMBERNA. ta,z, ay..eats � � PURCELL PLUMBING & HEATING 220 Sv,�, �.e 362 . 5 ss5 te,zi zes.s..ts LARRY PURCELL - linter Licome No. 3079M To Ce,�c�ssiOa✓ 3119O � f .Pne lit V". tray .ro tv coot w ,acaTax. auaca.facT I oan or rrrs I as awran We 1. .vmrr Nm-kal—S w wt~ft wf: S- Kyydo F.R L 1)4'ic lo;/err' Zyilcl� //o C P Co..,c ea/ei 1us 4 L/C -/✓E c /Sdo C c W 4K.2 s- /9x1 e,95,14 moa,/ =1141 A* '4uce-t y F Ui!/ (moo1$/C - bo " SS !/,P1.tvai C � co ✓ceK /e d /7/,, s.4 ,���/ P S sVa7�fCG �lOu�✓T� ejeA, UiPAii✓ s/ .4/Aa ��•✓J�S - �e�.v deJei!.,p4W ,-NP 'S 5 -..App /Y �wu /�0 5 C Oi6b 5 c !�//C .6,z ;Fp.4e,2S �e�. �•�C//P i .'e- ��t.r. �nl� J O/QA N y`o K mit 1 �f le - Of VrOyO9F hereby to fumfah materni and labor — CoMplata S, &Ccoroamca .nth 60oua swif c 10ra, fa. t e au. of, wrm.m to be masa at iouoma: m w—weler. m. rnr.rr 011 ratarN m w.mm Yw.mr y Wrr r aararr. Ili ams nrr.. au,amfyma - .r..sw .m..>,r .r r awM.. aq rw m.r aww. w m+ ar... • 6yrnWa ww luso. e w .aa.. w ala u wrWr far wow rcras. 0. ftl awl aww w eaw- a— r rr.ae a as..r w rr r.wrar. www. v ame d On ern w ba► ewer w ,earviar. a Croarrrr rraa r .6 .0 �� seb.wr or u. r wa accegaa aalrr yo., ' e Aruptaur of f raycoM —tor bo...., GaMikOwera aro [Orson. am Wn4ct" an arm trraar accept" you w wamwe to M ap the viol. ae acdod gull wm to res n aebra0 aaeam. Dam of accapfanca: sow we C I PQOM PAUL HOGLUND MASONRY Route 4, Box 288 MONTICELLO. MN 55382 Phone (812) 295-7728 Proposal Proposal No. Sheet No. Date Of zro- a�q Tg �i�Proposall Submitted To Work To Be Performed At /� Names i J Qr (' �-�+ e Q n Sheet Street � City Slot. Cil" Date of Plan Stat,- I Architect Telephone Numbe, Wa hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all fhe labor necessary for the completion of C AN T.a'iC��e� WMAlt 0.S c. ,::S It, L Ara — AI_` YV\ /4T6 V—\ALS 5t ,P PLA C D BJ C—Au LA4Sn� c� J—A.jg5().a= it malarial is guaranteed to be as specified• and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings -and specillcotio s submitted for above wT.r� and complets4.in a substantial workmanlike manner for the s rk of �bA,A® &XyQ Nuf.+0400 47" •'"D/ora--Oollors 3 950• I. with payments to be mode as follows: -gft OARS AS=?T?— Cr_T^1=Ln(OA± Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving echo cost,, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become on extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreement, contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornodo and other necessary insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance on above work to be token out by Respectfully submitted t -Z Per Note — This proposal may bs withdrawn by us If not accepted within 10 days ACCEPTANC! OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions ore satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are outhorlted to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. .cepter� Signotum Date signature I Proposal FROM�,1„/� I� V/ L'G{1P S LG5�- �✓1C lY'crlTlCe IIJ t �.�, Proposal Submitted To NameCl�� c�< W1<-✓�. *_tfP�IC Stream City Sraw Telephone Number SS3&Z Proposal No. Sheet No. Date / Work To Be Performed At �/ Sheat ni7cAtr Sts'U 1:2 � ;1P 1d17 Gtyk"'t'+*rre t Io state ^9t✓• Date of Plans Architv�' We hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the completion of cA.) Cr1A;Cj SJ,VA-: L1nr rS �c� 52l, n d S�CYaI Y S o_ e o ' ll material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of Dollars IS 19So, O 0 1. with payments to be made os Ilows. �7 // ^ II I v. a SG r4,4S .4 Cies G .Nyle4-1 Any alteration or deviation from above specincatlons Involving extra costs, will be eucuted only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necesso insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance on above work to be token out by -z" ; Id r r Respectfully submitted �+ / Pwrs I Pet Note — This proposal may be withdrawn by us If not accepted within 348 days ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, srmclfications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are outhorhed to do the work as specined. Payment will be made as outlined above. .ccaptee, Signature Date Signature tow roar 8480 Q uv refit opowl Proposal No. FROM 1 1 /j tr _ Sheet No. It' li(r Dari 4,�UU4).TY-) 6634-a Proposal Subm..iitt'teed� �To � j'�,� Work To Se Performed At /J t + t.6- street 7 / ll+++ �_,t .ZZr"Q 0-C l 1 Nome � j ,� $tree' "' City ' fl TLS -L --,-r (! City Date of Plant Stat- I Archi°, Telephone Number We hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the completion of r rA-L-k l t-rc. ----I;fic . x I& x tx>v y,y !i_ trr Q -,ri A (I —r;,, —7,-H I—VI sn (-r All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike monner for the sum of Dollars with pay n to be mode as follows Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other nee*%*wronc ypan above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by_=71A 1A FF 1 ) Respectfully submitted -- CLL, Per a Note . This proposal may be withdrown by us it not accepted within t,,,� D days ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are satVactary and are hereby accepted. You are outhorited to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. kcceptea Signature Doti Signaturo rase room 0460 19 4nee w u CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUC^_ION FOR THE t CONCESSION STAND AND RES:'ROOMS "ROOF" IMPROVEMENT NO. SOFTBALL 88-2 ROOF FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO TRIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day of by and between the City of Monticello, Monticello, Minnesota, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "Owner" and hereinafter called the "Contractor", WITNESSETIS: That in consideration of their mutual covenants and agreements as hereinafter set forth, the Owner for itself and the Contractor for itself, its successors and assigns, covenants and agrees as follows; to wit: 1. The Contractor agrees to furnish all the necessary matz24sis, labor, use of tools, equipment, plant, and every other thing necessary to perform the work designated and referred to in this contract, including all Contractor's superintendence and to furnish everything necessary for the completion of the improvement which is the subject of this agreement (except ouch things as the Owner has specifically agreed to provide according to the contract documents), and agrees to perform and complete the roof work shown in the plans and drawings, entitled Concession Stand and restrooms "Roof" prepared by the City of Monticello dated April 19, 1988, and to conform in all respects. with the provisions and requirements of the plans and specifications dated April 19, 1988. 2. The Contractor agrees that performance shall be in accordance with the terms, requirements, and conditions of this instrument, and laws of the State of Minnesota, and the following documents: Advertisement for Proposals for said Inprovement No. Softball 88-2 Roof Work. Proposal by the Contractor, presented to the Monticello City Council on and accepted by the Council on Concession Stand —a' 6/88 q Contract Documents for said Improvement No. Softball 88-2 Roof Work dated April 19, 1988, referred to in the preceding paragraph of this Agreement and made a part of the aforementioned proposal. Plans and Drawings for said Improvement No. Softball 88-2 Roof Work as identified in the preceding paragraph of this Agreement and which are dated April 19, 1988. Any Addenda to the plans, drawings, general conditions, and specifications for said Improvement No. Softball 88-2 Roof Work which addendum was prepared by the City of Monticello. 3. The owner agrees to pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement and the Contractor agrees to accept in full compensation therefor, the sums set forth within the aforementioned proposal of the Contractor. It is understood and agreed that the said proposal is for the construction of said Improvement No. Softball 88-2 Roof Work on a lump sum price basis in accordance with said proposal, and that the sum of 1 {jG 'a- ./.ter as set out in said proposal, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. 8y Concession stand 8Y By -7- (Corporate Seal) (City Seal) 1,11r i t�'{is guaranteed to be at specilled, and Me above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings r .od specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of Dollars is 3372.00 i, with payments to be made as follows, upon COlt>gl.otion Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an 0x110 charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry An, tornado and other necessary Insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public LiablGty Insurance on above work to be token out by Respectfully subytitted/ Ron White Const. per Note — This proposal may be withdrawn by us If not accepted within 30 cloy% ACCEPTANCE Of PROPOSAL The above prices, "clAcattons and conditions an wticfacstary and are hereby accepted. You are authorised to do the _Wk at specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. ' ,ceptsA Signature Date Rionatun 1 � t Vons room eeeo Proposal Proposal No. FROM Sheat No. Ron Whito Const. April 22, 1988 7 Riverside Date Ronticallo, M; 55362 295-5960 Proposal Submitted To Work To Be Performed At Nom, City of Monticello She,„, Concession Stand Roof Strset City hat. City Date of Plant Stat. Archit - Telephone Number We hereby propose to furnish all the labor necessary for the completion of Install roof trusses, shinales, soffits, interior plywood coiling,anl hinged plywood door on service window par plans orovidod by City (windows 1-00 and 2-W) 1,11r i t�'{is guaranteed to be at specilled, and Me above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings r .od specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of Dollars is 3372.00 i, with payments to be made as follows, upon COlt>gl.otion Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an 0x110 charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry An, tornado and other necessary Insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public LiablGty Insurance on above work to be token out by Respectfully subytitted/ Ron White Const. per Note — This proposal may be withdrawn by us If not accepted within 30 cloy% ACCEPTANCE Of PROPOSAL The above prices, "clAcattons and conditions an wticfacstary and are hereby accepted. You are authorised to do the _Wk at specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. ' ,ceptsA Signature Date Rionatun 1 � t Vons room eeeo Name C. ITY GF Mo"T IC-CLL- o Date 4 - ZZ - 88 Page / Of 4 Address 750 Salesman __IFFr- t* S. Phone Job Name or Number Rra�.cpJob Code TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ESTIMATE We are unable to guarantee quantities listed; however, you will be billed only Quantity for materials used. Extra materials will be billed at prevailing list prices. Errors Arithmetic errors are subject to correction. Payment is due on the 7th of the month following date of invoice. All Payment discounts are forfeited if payment is not made on that date unless arrangements are made in advance. A service charge will be added to all balances over 30 days old. Vendor agrees to honor the unit prices set forth herein for deliveries made within a period of A -11� days provided acceptance is made within 15 Quantities days of estimate date vendor will provide vendee with priced copy"o�� estimate after acceptance is signed. Disclosures of Minnesota lien law statute will be made as specified by law Lein Law after acceptance; however, a copy is printed on the reverse of this page for your inspection. { This is a summary of general policies only, a more specific and detailed copy of terms will be made available on request. Vendee hereby authorizes vendor to furnish materials as listed on the estimate Acceptance at the prices set forth therein. This acceptance shall operate as a contract for the sale of goods and shall be governed by the Uniform Commercial Code. Vendee acknowledges that the person signing this acceptance has full power and authority to bind the principal with when the contract has been negotiated. Ree•-Twusses AaiL 3_ %ovimsKs our. Pn Om H i axww tAnmmt3 1 55309 1 J6121 2GI."&4 Date Additional Information Cross Total PPO,lGGT NO �VC1t,n6L Q3'2 kceaT ypnl( Sales Tax NON1r V -C --T O;:iO wool '�w,c„c T; Total 5 50h SEd.T o" O -4o Noll— he— • ` D".Charges 5 C-(, Tio m O GiO MMPI titer ANC lio.o�F L• Awp G=%L-Nv Total 550 h 0-5`4uss Discount 797 ot"B a 11•S$ �o Total 4,70-2, Ree•-Twusses AaiL 3_ %ovimsKs our. Pn Om H i axww tAnmmt3 1 55309 1 J6121 2GI."&4 Page 'z- PIECES PIECES DESCRIPTION FEET PRICE TOTAL t I+ I o zxg s I(v' Hlr 171 41 S 70 av IZL_ 0 5„ 7 70' SOF jlL.l. 40 3°t0 IS ro= - LF- 9 z.Y(o sF� Lomak,.,- =08 c:90 IZa Iz ( to 3,0 49 z z w.2 12 Ic, DI iL Zo ?9n 7 G� 57 4:<� 13 I/:' C•1'� x �I v_, _,rte Iia 3 10 5G5 iff / Z Za 4 Z x(> i5 S' STF H1;,R ? Zvr, '0 8' 14 hFCR qO 49O I 1 4xs '2 '/z C.cx Rv,_r-�� �z 310 I 4 xg '0 ��� 7-//i Fr2 32. 577 /8 '= I ' to yrs 20 Ate;-►+ S14 I tuce�__ 1 7_ q '$ 540 =5 , A — 22 �nW Sl�no�Ta 4 IZ= 41 122 I _27 ��_er.t4 FmF tZflae /Co 2 `= 35 s= I � oL_A--tt 2' F'.,eF Lnavff- P--- 8 7- 5G ,o 13 4-(5 25 =/9 A C PI_Yt,+ 576 '41.5 231 °= 3310 LFT 70 /Jrz F. J. R: wont 5 7 1894 /d5= I /(n0 LFT 22 /Vv pr+AtiQJ j?.U. 2f JIRD — ZL--J v F. J. R�JIJ Rp Y 40 1844 �� " I a 20 1 I\, :z -4 VS J0 %2 A LL T%L4wl.,^• /024 5Z5 5717 —� 1 I �t I _ I ZC, LF7 32 Ix; D - FIHc 8U I�So u 148 `�- 1280 — 3] Ix d - PINe 47 1650 (, a> �p LFT 2i 4s" ALu.. GGKCCN /O J! 1 Z MZ1 J0 In R A i N pmi ave leA Z 1/ � .27- Z» 37 JB 9° qq •D0 Page J 'PIECES �rti t DESCRIPTION FEET PRICE TOTAL. I 2 3 1394 1/ 3 1x 4 T f?' "� j Fl•, 1544 14 �� ►��_� �' - ZZ (n 1,x44 1/ oc. i 1,c Z ,o ._ �' Z (844 3 "� ! I — ++ g ' -- '— "`) 1 6 4 4 1~ i 4x2 +r i3 Z/4 AC 7:.0 3 4x P, t4 �lr3 t �'!�! �tiC _ 9C.v '377 �7^Z k r^,5 `..1 I +S bo 45 A, I? o,.9 I T — 3 a {{{ lD sz e y +o 10 76 7 20 `%jL Avu -_!'.:.T �':�+'?G+•II: Jr 21 CiAc..t T2Fv 40 %5 30 I 15 I =/4 rr S 75 3 S Z `� 10.4 23 -- � c, N- Z 73 1 Z CT 24 Fib ii2stvG. 2 3 7 c_o J;5 -z 25 vT ir,A50— /V sI LS /5 Z` b -� 29 rtNtSN 4 .70 Z'= 27 26 pr_.+�T.r lr.e-o,i� /00 OS 1 5 11 IZ /oU ro !I,.." AU r. Z:. rtr_.✓ /DIS iZ ao ' 3 TvRC `30 ' Gi5 2 i31 32 33 34 35 38 3T 38 1 Page_ PIECES ' DESCRIPTION FEET PRICE TOTAL pI I 0 14 /i 0., �— 9 Inso �- 9 /rvc L vDY V L -e -Jt. en I '0 12 — ar- •�;e _- +3 B0L CVLIp2t I[ Pi I i5 sL M>R Ire I ++ +o i 20 21 22 1 2] 1 2. I 25 20 I 21 20 20 30 31 32 22 04 I35 I 2e I 7/ x 70 i0 100 Chelsea Road • Monticello, MN 55362 • 295-2120 �C 113 Central Ave. • St. Michael, MN 55376 • 497-2121 Name d �nlaJdr� • I �ffL[� Date 4PN L Tpage 1 Of � Address '2550 ewvr 'Pnfffl1, Salesmal"BW1+,.i U1• t Jur e _ Phone 64 iA*U pi1y� r. tJltti 'LAS' 'I� Job Name or Number ZnR'P1T7 . Job Code TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ESTIMATE Quantity We are unable to guarantee quantities listed; however, you will be billed only for materials Used. Extra materials will be billed at prevailing list prices. Errors Arithmetic errors are subject to correction. Returns All special orders including windows and prehung doors are cancellable or returnable only if we can cancel or return them and then are subject t0 any freight, vendor restocking charges and our own restocking charge which is 5%. Restocking Charge A 5% restocking charge will be assessed on all returned merchandise. Delivery All deliveries of $800.00 or more are free within a 15 mile radius. There is a 51,00 per mile charge for each mile beyond 15. Deliveries totaling less than $800.00 will be made at the rate of $1.00 per mile. $15.00 minimum. Payment Payment is due on the 10th of the month following date o1 invoice. All discounts are forfeited if payment is not made on that date unless arrangements are made in advance. A service charge Oil be added to all balances over 30 days old. Quantities Vendor agrees t0 honor the unit prices sal forth herein for deliveries made within a period 01 _ Zn_ days provided acceptance is made within 19 days of estimate date. Vendor will provide vendee with priced copy of estimate after acceptance is signed. Lien Lew Disclosures of Minnesota lien law statute will be made as specified by law after acceptance, however, a copy is printed on the reverse of this page for your inspection. This is a summary of general policies only, a more specific and detailed copy of terms will be made available on request. Acceptance Vendee hereby authorizes vendor to furnish materials as listed on the estimate at the prices set forth therein, This acceptance shall Operate as 0 contract for the sale Of goods and shall be govern - ad by the Uniform Commercial Code. Vendee acknowledges that the person signing this accetT lance has full power and authority to bind the principal with when the Contract has been negotiated. By Date ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: GROSS TOTAL y`I ,I_ 1�., .LESS NET ITEMS r I� Qr8 DMI Pf�rp TOTAL C T4"1Ati4t. ® IAL MtjM_. LESS 4 -Ax ir, ?�x ♦ NET ITEMS -bl u6Z'S� TAX !6-7. jb DELIVERY '( (�' ,J NET TOTAL �2q' 13 v • 100 Chelsea Road • Monticello, IVIN 113 Central Ave. • St. Michael, MN NAME t�ID'iz -z" JOB Cc1fIi G /-47X, DATE6='I,_Z1 PAGE—". PIECES SIZE DESCRIPTION FEET SFO 'ZsCb No Rpm #fz_O­Z� ftt. 5 "'Z 4 JO' 4:1� 4- 6t�CCT rip- a Y O� M. T41, LO 6_11HILO. P-;Cz klpfl--s 4- �l '. «j f't , S44 101 Ix I C - P-4 V6 4 5. VJ-9— 6F=: � z? 1 r::)& If, Ix 511.1 F>L 4OF k-7- 4Rdfl- 3L 12E 4 j_4er,#+m . 4� ., - If 4 I3 arta 1001 INC> ft� ti- 2 zo I i'l 6m 60 1 02- Ift, In*1 NArE.11l�►�ceu o U� CV' PIECES I i 100 Chelsea Road • Monticello, MN ! 113 Central Ave. • St. Michael, MN mB NtM5;O►XI 05'T}h1I) DATF PAGE SIZE DESCRIPTION FEET 17r 9fnTl 14' - 4c42)wrrn zo s rr l Cu-prnl f vF��i Y Ir f g+4 jam- 4e� i� Y�� I irrl �I►r. Vin' (,��kn�Ucfin.l Atl t- I 3�l 17lL Y'7-11- x47 Pok IK� *2 :Pm-�N I cTnl 9iv Enn . � l ad W11V Mme. ksm^F v-u.aJ. 7 o I I 1._ 1 U Council Agenda - 4/25/88 10. Consideration of Constructing Well #4. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Deep well 03, which was authorized for cornpletion by the Council at the last meeting, is near complete. At the time of the drafting of this agenda supplement, the screen is in place and well development is ongoing. We expect the first actual test pumping to begin on Monday, April 25. As you recall, our goal is to get approximately 1,000 gallons per minute from this well to serve as a standby or backup or blending well. At the last meeting, we discussed briefly the scenerio of completing deep well t4 in the industrial park south of Dundas Road just west of the drainage ditch. Our initial estimates for this system are as follows. Deep well 04, 220 ft. deep S 35,000.00 Pitless unit for installation of submersible pump $ 10,000.00 Submersible pump and controls $ 20,000.00 Innerconnecting valving 6 piping to deep well 03 pumphouse near reservoir $ 45,000.00 TOTAL $110,000.00 Design engineering inspection, legal, bond fees, 6 admin. -208 $ 22,000.00 TOTAL PROJF= COST $132,000.00 It is expected that John Badalich will present additional information for Monday evening's meeting with more refined costs or other scenerios. If the information is available in time, we will send it with your agenda packet. In preparation for the upcoming decision regarding deep well p4, City staff took water samples for detailed analysis from test well 04 from the Kline residential well to the south and from the Kjellberg agricultural well north of the easterly trailer park along Highway 25. We expected to have these results today for your review over the weekend. However, we have been informed by Feedrite of Minneapolis that some of the testing was performed by other labs, and they will not have the results until Monday, April 25. We will present these results at that time. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative, after review of John eadalich's additional cost information and scenerios and the water testing, if these prove favorable, to to authorize bids for the construction of deep well #4 and the innerconnecting piping. Also at this time there would be some redesigning necessary of pumphouse to be located over deep well A3i and the Council could authorize the re -advertisement of bids for the pumphouse pending staff's review of the plane. -10- C Council Agenda - 4/25/88 2. The second alternative could be to continue as originally planned utilizing only deep well p3 and make best efforts to control the elevated levels of iron and manganese with the injection of more polyphosphates than currently being used. All available information at this time indicates a high possibility that the manganese will be unable to be held in suspension and will more than likely be released and deposited on the white sheets and clothing of Monticello residents. If we were going to attempt to utilize deep well 13 as a "prime well", much more investigation and chemical tests with the water from that well would have to be performed and still may not give a true indication of the treatment capabilities. 3. The third alternative would be to construct deep well e4 so that it could pump directly into the system or into the reservoir. "in may involve building the pumphouse south of Dundas Road and building some complex means of changing the pumping capabilities or deep well /4 through some type of false head valving device. John Badalich may present some additional information on this alternative at the meeting. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff reserves its recommendation until we have further information from the water testing and John Badalich's cost studies. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Please refer to your previous agenda items regarding well logs, etc. am m V Council Agenda - 4/25/88 11. Consideration of Allowing Lions Club to use Ellison Park for July 3rd Celebration. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Ken Maus of the Lions Club recently contacted me to find out whether the City had any problems with the July 3rd Celebration being held in Ellison Park this year rather than in the West Bridge Park as in the past. If the organization proceeds with their plans at the present time to use Ellison Park, they will probably be using a tent structure near the new gazebo for serving their chicken dinners and concession stand operation. This information is being brought to the Council's attention primarily for the Council's consideration and approval of the Lions Club relocating the festival to Ellison Park. One of the main reasons the club is considering this option is that they have experienced congestion problems at the end of the parade route in the past when it terminated at Bridge Park; and this year they plan on having more local bands participate in the parade, thus requiring additional space for the bands to congregate. As a result, the club is considering a new parade route that would start at Pinewood on the west end and proceed to the high school along Third Street. his would allow plenty of room for bands to get organized for the parade and also to disperse at the end of the route. With the new planned parade route, the club felt the park activities would be better suited for Ellison Park, as it would be nearer the end of the parade route, and with the high school parking lot available, residents would have an area to park in that would be reasonably close to the park facilities. If the Council concurs with the Lions Club's concept, about the only needed improvement to Ellison Park would be additional electrical outlets near the gazebo for their concession stand. I believe the City will be soon installing electrical power to the gazebo, and the only extra cost would probably be if the City could provide an additional power source approximately 100 feet from the gazebo. Although the Lions Club has not made a firm decision yet, it is possible that the July 4th Celebration in the future will also be held in Ellison Park. Some items the Council may want to consider would bo parking and traffic congestion in a primarily residential area surrounding Ellison Park. The fact that a large parking lot to available at the high school and is reasonably close to Ellison Park may eliminate parking in the residential neighborhoods. Although West Bridge Park seemed rnore appropriate for alcoholic beverages due to its proximity to commercial property, the one -day festivities may not cause a problem but is something the Council may want to considler if they concur with the Lions Club 'a request. Mr. Maus noted that the nursing home officials were in favor of the celebration being in Ellison Park, and they even offered the use of their parking lot for those that attend. -12- Council Agenda - 4/25/88 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: e 1. Affirm the Lions Club request to use Ellison Park for their July 3rd Celebration. If approved, the Council could direct the staff to provide additional electrical outlets for the Lions Club use near the gazebo. 2. Recommend to the Lions Club that they continue to use West Bridge Park rather than Ellison Park. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As I indicated previously, this item is being brought to the Council's attention primarily because of initial staff's concerns over Ellison Park being primarily surrounded by residential development and the nursing home versus West Bridge Park abutting more of a conmercial environment. We certainly understand the Lions Club's reason for considering Ellison Park as the site due to the new parade route they are proposing. When West Bridge Park is compared to Ellison Park, parking facilities for those in attendance may be better at the high school than they were near West Bridge Park. The fact that the nursing home is not opposed to the idea, there may not be any serious problems with the festivities being relocated. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None. M -13- APRIL GENERAL FUND AMOUNT Duluth Technical Inst. - Seminar for Fire Dept. 150.00 Kevin Boynton - Easement for 039 Project 100.00 Eugene Kraus - Easement for 039 Project 200.00 ICMA Retirement Corp. - Payroll ded. 911.17 State.Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. 123.04 Colleen Kuchenmeister -MN DTED - Reg. fee - 011ie K. - 25.00 _ :--Jeff O'Nei'll -.Travel expense for seminar '-"' 179.95 Corrov Sanitation - March payment 7,047.30 Jerry Hermes - Janitorial at library 227.50 David Stromberg - Animal control expense 396.00 Mrs. Beverly Johnson- Animal control expense 275.00 OSM - Engineering fees 4,116.51 MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 186.00 MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 36.00 PERA - Pera W/H 1,542.33 Anoka County Social Services - Payroll ded. 204.00 Commissioner of Revenue - SWT 2,487.00 Wright County State Bank - FWT 5,291.22 YMCA of Mpla. - Monthly contract 625.00 James Preusse - Cleaning city hall and fire hall 450.00 Arve Grimsmo - Mayor salary 175.00 Dan Blonigen - Council salary 125.00 Mrs. Fran Fair - Council salary 125.00 William Fair - Council salary 125.00 Warren Smith - Council salary 123.19 Ms. Joyce- Dowling - Planning Comn. salary 49.27 Richard Martie - Planning Comm. salary 49.27 Richard Carlson - Planning Comm. salary 49.17 Mrs. 'Cindy Lem - Planning Comm. salary 49.27 - :-Pitnoy-Sousa ­Nev postage scale chart 5.00 State.Treos. - State Building Insp. - Bldg. permit surchge 267.56 Al Larson - Reimbursement for phone calls for HRA 15.52 Corrov Sanitation - Add'l. landfill chargee 1,133.60 Daryl Heikee - Easement - 039 Project 340.00 'Transport .Clearings - Freight chargee 39.30 Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone expense 1,045.60 Northern States Power - Utilities 6.847.27 North Central Public Service - Utilities 1.454.49 Norwest Investments Services - Computer payment 2.407.61 PSGI - Contract payment 6 Viking pipe services 22,570.85 Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax for let quarter 434.77 Monticello Fire Dept. - Firemen's wages 1,512.14 VOID -0- MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg, fees 335.00 Bunn -O -Matic Corp. - Coffee pot repairs 3.50 Bauerly Bros. - Final payment on Chelsea Rd. project 16,808.19 _ :'League 'of. MN.Cities"Ins.-Trust -.Ins..'promium , - ,_ _ •:.51.584.00 Principal Mutual Ins. - Group Ina. 4,659.38 Carelick Steel Go. - Supplies 487.30 Hudson Professional Div. - Fire Dept. supplies .. 525.64 AT 4 T - Fire phone charges 3.96 Monticello Office Produets - Office*'aupplles `- 194.64 GENERAL FUND AMOUNT VOID -0- Feedrite Controls - Water Dept. supplies 1.477.00 Al Nelson - Sub. renewal 13.75 Bowman Barnes - St. Dept. supplies 24.92 Unitog Rental Services - Uniform rental 102.40 Karen Doty.- Mileage expense 27.25 Ramier, Gries, etc. - Professional.services - Raindance 517.50 North Star Risk Services - Ins. premium 401.00 ICMA - Sub. 168.75 Copy Equipment - Supplies 54.00 Braun Eng. 6 Testing - Testing at WWTP 638.75 Suburban Gas - Supplies 68.25 West Central Ind. - Stakes for St. Dept. 78.21 Coast to Coast - Supplies for all Depts. 344.90 Local 949 - Union dues 115.00 St. Cloud Restaurant Supply - Towels for library 34.78 Harry's Auto Supply - Supplies 131.34 Wright County Journal Press'- Sub. renewal 18.00 Martie's Farm Service - St. supplies 19.00 Servistar Hardware - Supplies 94.39 St. Cloud Fire Equipment - Service on fire eating. 117.50 Northern Oxygen Service - Fire Dept. supplies II.70 Security Locksmiths - Rekey men's bathroom in city hell 31.00 Monticello Printing - Printing 6 supplies 222.50 Persian's - Repair dictaphones 118.00 Ben Franklin Store - Toilet tissue for parks_ 27.60 National Bushing - Supplies 72.32 Jim Hatch Sales - St. Dept. supplies - Lights and brooms 736.00 Chapin Publishing Co. - Ad. for bide 170.00 Wang - Computer mtce. agreement for April 426.00 Granite Electronics.- Fire Dept. repairs 49.25 Wright County Trees. - Police c6ntract payment - April' 11.896:66 Maus Foods - Supplies for all Depts. 107.27 Unocal - Gas - Water Dept. 33.39 Simonson Lumber Co. - Material for Mtce. Bldg. 482.07 R. L. Could - Supplies for parks 1.430.10 PERA - Ins. premiums 27.00 ICMA - Payroll ded. 911.17 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. 123.04 Rick Wolfsteller - Mileage expense"- April 300.00 Jerry Hermes - Janitorial at library 227.50 David Stromberg - Animal control expense 384.00 Wright County State Bank - FICA, etc. 5.095.66 Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 488.00 PERA - PERA W/H 1,486.97 Plumbery - Repairs it WPP •226.68 .011ie Koropchak - Mileage expense 39.96 Monticello Times - Publish. and renewals 977.67 Daly, Bohling.-- Legal for Union negotiations 382.50 Dave Kern - Letters for sign on city hall 167.50 Central Eyewear - Classes I80.00 Wright County Treasurer - Real estate taxes 1,278.17 Wright County Highway Dept. - Sand/salt mix for streets 1,320.00 Taylor Land Surveyors - Prints 12.00 Olson 6 Sons Electric - Repairs - Res. 1,061.96 Davis Water Equip. - Park supplies 298.74 - -2- -. GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO. West Publishing Co. - 1988 MN. Session Laws 92.50 27256 Government Training Service - Seminar fee for Plan. Comm. 325.00 27257 Frank Madden 6 Assoc. - Professional services 97.50 27258 Dahlgren, Oban, etc. - Professional services 6,016.25 27259 Robert Krautbauer - Purchase of land for lift station - County /39 East 7,400.00 27260 E. H: Renner - Test Wella 3 b 4 7,695.75 27261 Monti Truck Repairs - Supplies 4.00 27262 The Glass Hut - 2 windshields - St. Dept. 157.68 27263 Century Labs - Parks supplies 882.20 27264 Crysteel Dist. Co. - New dump truck 7,271.00 27265 Central McGowan - Cylinder rental 8.19 27266 Humane Society of Wright County - Animal control expense 55.00 27267 TW Hardware - Water Dept. supplies 5.40 27268 Holiday Station - Fire Dept. gas 47.83 27269 Payroll for March 29.550.69 TOTAL GENERAL FUND DISBURSEMENTS - APRIL $233.076.67 I LIQUOR FUND LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS FOR APRIL - 1988 Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor VOID_ Commiseioner of Revenue - SWT - March Wright County State Bank - FWT State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor PERA - Para W/H Quality Wine - Liquor Ed Phillipe b Sone - Liquor Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor . Cruys, Johnson - Computer charges for Jan. 6 Feb. Dahlheimer Dist. Co. - Beer -Crah1te City Jobbing Co. - Misc. mdse. BRubald Beverage Co. - Beer %idoewge�.T�oepho�eer Telephone Monticello Times - Adv. Bernick's Pepsi Cola - Misc. mdse. Viking Coca Cola - Misc. mdse. Leifert Trucking - Freight Seven Up Bottling - Misc. mdse. ry Jude Candy b Tobacco - Misc. mdse. " Foster. Franzen - Ins. premiums due ` H b H Industries - Light bulbs Kolles Sanitation - Garbage contract ' '- Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax ,for March Maus Foods - Store expense -- •--- - North Central Pablic'Service - Utilities Security Locksmiths - Rekeying locks Northern States Power Co. - Utilities Ed Phillipe b Sons - Liquor _ Dick Beverage - Beer Croeslein Beverage - Beer Day Diet. Co. - Beer St. Cloud Restaurant Supply - Towels Principal Mutual Life - Croup Ins. League of MN. Cities Ins. Trust - Ina. premium--'" - - Johnson Bro. - Liquor State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. Para - Para W/H - Ins. premium Wright County State Bank - FYI Para - Para W/H Joe Hartman - Reimbursement for expenses Ed Phillips b Sone - Liquor Griggs. Cooper - Liquor City of Monticello - Investments "'- Eagle Wine -.Liquor Quality Wine - Liquor Johnson Bros. - Liquor Payroll for March TOTAL LIQUOR FUND DISBURSEMENTS - APRIL REUNt 3,887.01 562.32 -0- 276.00 687.68 200.00 234.14 215.03 1,680.60 795.19 1,251.38 220.00 14,699.90 13.58 799.27 7.713:99 82.45 337.35 379.65 - 477.65 192.20 665.62 106.26. 220.18 133.50 6,121.20 26.85 .137.16 74.50 525.64 3.369.86 2,064.65 10,060.32 967.60 30.78 388.37 --7-348:00 1;521-.06 200.00 9.00 657.32 201.69 131.80 2,022.97 2,326.61 35.000.00 146.63 2,256.93 1;140.33 5,042.38 $111,961.83 r• - 1/ ,i 1 INDlVIDDAL PPJ3RIT ACf2VITY REPDNT Month of MAfiCN 1988 PEMIT OCSCIIPTION NUMBERI I TYPE NAX...TZ/LDrA?IDN I VAWATIOP f R DI7 I BURCBARG6 PLYXOIND I SURCHARGE 86.1150 Interior Office R.wdal AC Devldls Photography/113 Lotwt Bt. 6'ID,000.00 6 117.00 6 5.00 1 1 88.1151 Interior Xouaa Remodel AD Darwin Btrar/801 Yset R1ver Bt. 5,000.00 10.00 2.50 88.1152 aas.mant PI m4h AD Prencla Linke/341 Al ve cvier Or ive 1,300.00 15.00 .50 66.1131 Nowa and Cerape 39 ELI B6ilder./2760 Need- Lane 59,700.00 458.15 29.8! 21.00 .50 BB -115. Nowa and Carepe Ru ldi ng AD Xarry ►1 t0h/412 Rl vervier Drive 7,400.00 93.60 3.70 86.1155 HOYse Remod.l AD Michael Olson/1608 Wa' Nlvar et. 29,000.00 278.00 1..50 68.1156 Duple: with Garage. D Jerry Hallsan Constr./243 i 243 IYrvin Elwood Road 86,000.00 578.50 43.00 30.00 .50 888.1757 Howe and Garage Reeiding AD John Reeve/1017 West River 6t. 11,000.00 133.20 5.90 88.1158 Cold Stor.g. BYllding I A inbor Enterprise., Inc./1248 E. Oakwood Io. ..600.00 48.00 7.]0 88.1139 Oarapa Addition RD Via i Herb Hellmn/ 3 PI lsalppi Dr. 3,000.00 ]0.00 1.60 66.1160 Now. Addition RD Daryl i Margaret Trn6le/1707 Nest River St .0,000.00 1.9.50 20.00 15.00 .50 80-1161 House Rea idlnp AD Ray i Doris Angell/306 East 3rd St. . 600.00 46.00 2.30 TOTAL 628 ,600.00 62,1929' 6131.05 660.00 31.50 PLRN RNIEY 888-1I Sl Noss 4nd CaraO. ~ 1T BLIT Builders/2760 Mesdw Lane 1 297.79 60-1116 Duplam rlth damps. 3 Jerry Nal loran Con.tr./243 i 245 narvin Elwood Road 374.72 TOTAL PLAN REVIEW 3 6r2 -T-1 0 1 TOTAL REVENUE 3 3,006.01 CITY OF MONTICELLO Monthly Building Dep.rtwnt jiapart Month of MARCH 19 BB yy PERMITS AND USES Vat - Sew Month Leet -ThI. Y,er PERMITS ISSUED Month PEB. MontThis Month MUCH last Y.er To t:. Det. To Data RESIDENTIAL Numbs 1 10 9 25 12 Veluetlon S 58,000.00 S 2.8,000.00 S 302,500.00 S 1,061,700.00 S ]11,'00.00 Peas 749 26 2,702.46 3,6.0.60 9,937.21 3,501.72 Su h.rg,. 29..0 123.75 151.50 531.09 155.65 COMMERCIAL Numb,[ 1 2 7 2 Ve1u.tlon 10,000.00 3,500.00 250,330.00 235,000.00 Pe se 117.00 68.00 1,595.40 11194.00 SU[aherg,. 5.00 2.00 125.40 117.50 INDUSTRIAL Number 1 I Veluetlon 4,600.00 4,600.00 Pea• 46.00 46.00 Surcharge. 2.30 2.30 PLUMBING Number 1 3 6 20 6 Paas 23.00 68.00 150.00 498.00 131.00 BN rch.rg.. .So 1.50 3.00 10.00 3.00 OZ.. Number 2 2 Velust ton 1,500.00 1,500.00 Pee■ 40.00 40.00 Surcharg.. 1.00 1.00 TOTAL NO. PERMITS 1 I5 19 54 21 f IS TOTAL VALUATION 58,600.00 262,600.00 307,500.00 1,313,530.00 S51,400.00 TOTAL PP.P.S 749.26 2,933.46 3,073.60 12,070.61 4,872.72 TOTAL DURCHARCES 29.40 132.55 157.50 667.49 278.45 CURRENT MONTII Number 1.o Ue to PERMIT NATURE Must- PERMIT 91111CHARGE Velu.t.1- This ya •r Ia.t year 81.91, P..IIy 1 S 755.94 S 29.05 S 59,700.00 2 16 RupI. 1 951.22 43.00 86,000.00 1 r 1 Multi -!.ally 0 0 La®.rclel 0 0 indu.trl.l 1 46.00 2.30 4,600.00 1 0 R.a. 0arep.a 0 I Sign. 0 0 Public, Wilding. 0 0 ALTERATION OR REPAIR D.Iling. 1 995.30 50.90 102,300.00 9 7 Coe®.rcl.l I 117.00 5.00 10,000.00 17 Indu.tr l.1 0 0 PLUMBING Alt T,Pa. 3 68.00 1.50 6 20 Acer.gBOIIY STRUCTURES SVLwing Pool. 0 0 ONO k. 0 0 TLMPDRAAY PERMIT 0 0 OLMOLITION 0 0 TOTALS 15 2,033.46 132.55 262,600.00 21 54