City Council Agenda Packet 05-22-1989AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, May 22, 1989 - 7:30 p.m.
Mayor: Ren Maus
Council Members: Fran Pair, Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1989.
3. Citizens comments/pet itions, requests, and complaints.
4. Public hearing on proposed improvements to Mississippi Drive.
5. Consideration of resolution ordering improvement, accepting bid, and
authorizing contract - Mississippi Drive.
6. Public hearing on proposed bituminous upgrading of Oakwood Industrial
Park roads.
7. Consideration of resolution ordering improvement, accepting bid, and
authorizing contract - Oakwood Industrial Park.
8. Consideration of final plat approval - Country Club Court. Applicant,
Floyd Markling.
9. Consideration of allowing Monticello Jaycees to use West Bridge Park for
teen dance - July 1, 1989.
10. Consideration of developer agreement - Phase I - Meadows Second Addition.
11. Consideration of request to prepare plans and specifications for restroom
in West Bridge Park.
12. Consideration of purchasing PAX machine.
13. Consideration of bills for the month of May.
14. Adjournment.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, May 8, 1989 - 7:30 p.m.
Members Present: Ken Maus, Fran Fair, Shirley Anderson, Warren Smith, Dan
Blonigen.
Members Absent: None.
2. Approval of minutes.
Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, and unanimously
carried, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held April 24,
1989.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests and complaints.
None forthcoming.
4. Public hearing on the re -assessment of the 81-1 Improvement Project -
Edgar Klucas and Dan Frie.
City Administrator Wolfsteller outlined potential methods that could be
employed to establish an assessment amount for this project that was
completed in 1981. Wolfsteller reviewed three options which included
1) assessing the cost based on the original project cost, 2) assessing
cost based on the present cost to complete the same improvement, and
�. 3) assess an amount equal to the original cost plus the 13 percent
interest rate that would have accumulated for the 7-1/2 years since the
project was completed. In his summary, Wolfsteller reminded Council that
the assessment amount must not exceed the benefit created by the
improvements to the property.
1'
After discussion, it was the general consensus of Council to hire an
appraiser to evaluate the degree of benefit afforded to the subject
properties as a result of the installation of public utilities. Jim
Metcalf, representing Edgar Klucas, submitted a letter to the City which
outlined formal written objection to the amount of the proposed
assessment. He went on to note that the City had conducted an assessment
hearing when the project was completed. His client would have had at
that time the opportunity to respond to the proposal to charge interest
on unpaid assessment amounts. It was Metcalf's assertion that it would
not be proper for the City to charge interest on unpaid cost accumulating
since 1981, as the property owner in 1981 was not given the opportunity
to pay the assessment at the time that the project was completed, nor was
he given the opportunity to object to the assessment.
After discussion, motion was made by Pran Fair to order an appraisal of
properties benefited by Project 81-1 and continue the public hearing
until the City Council meeting scheduled for June 12, 1989. Motion was
seconded by Warren Smith and carried unanimously.
0
Council Minutes - 5/8/89
5. Consider a rezoning request to rezone residential unplatted property from
R-3 (medium density residential) to PZM (per:OCmance zone mixed).
Applicant, J & K Properties.
At this point in the meeting, Ken Maus relinquished his position as Mayor
and passed the gavel to Fran Fair. Maus then abstained from commenting
on this particular issue as the Mayor/Councilmember.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the proposal to rezone an area
approximately equal in size to one block located directly east of the
Maus Foods store from R-3 to PZM zoning. O'Neill indicated to Council
that the proposal to rezone this property from R-3 to PZM provides the
landowner with flexibility in developing this area as either residential
usage or commercial retail usage. He went on to note that the purpose of
the PZM or performance zoning district is to allow for development
flexibility and special design control within sensitive areas of the city
due to environmental or physical limitations. The performance zoning
district also attempts to create a reasonable balance between the
interest of the property owner in freely developing his property and at
the same time protect the interest of surrounding properties.
Fran Fair asked if this rezoning request would create more land available
for multi -family housing developments. Gary Anderson responded by saying
that the present zoning already allows multi -family development to occur,
whereas, the proposed PZM zone wntld orovir)o the cPnnrt._nity .cr ta,:
establishment as well as multi -family development. Therefore, this
rezoning actually decreases the possibility of development of
multi -family housing in this area.
After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen to approve the proposed
rezoning of subject parcel from R-3 to PZM zoning, with the motion to
approve being based on the finding that the proposal is 1) consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan, 2) compatible with geographic area and
character of adjoining land, 3) the rezoning will not tend to depreciate
the area in which it is proposed, and 4) the need for the proposed
rezoning has been sufficiently demonstrated. Motion was seconded by
Shirley Anderson and carried unanimously.
6. Consideration of a preliminary plat request for a proposed new
residential subdivision plat. Applicant, West Praiirie Partners.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the proposed preliminary plat
and went on to inform Council that the Planning Commission had
recommended approval of this plat based on the understanding that the
plat met all requirements of the City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance.
A problem was discovered with this plat when Council was informed that
one of the lot's front footage at the setback line is insufficient
relative to the City Ordinance. It was noted that Lot 5 possesses a lot
width of 32 feet at the building setback line, which is less than the
56 -foot minimum required by ordinance. Staff apologized for the late
notice of this particular problem. At this point, Council reviewed
7
y.
Council Minutes - 5/8/89
the inconsistency between the plat and the Zoning Ordinance and
determined that in this case a variance would be appropriate, as the City
has allowed shorter property width in circumstances where there is a
limited development area to work with. Requiring the 56 -foot property
width at setback line would reduce the number of lots that could be
created from seven to six. It was the view of the Council that the
impact of requiring adherence to this section of the ordinance in this
case would represent an unreasonable restriction on the use of the land
and that a variance would be appropriate in this case.
After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Shirley
Anderson, to approve the preliminary plat of Prairie West. Motion passed
unanimously.
In another matter relating to this development, the developers requested
that the City allow the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications
for this development with payment being made directly to the City
Engineer from the developers. This practice would allow the developers
to save the cost of two engineering firms preparing and reviewing plans
and specifications for the necessary public improvements associated with
Prai:ie West.
After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Warren
Smith, to grant permission to OSM to work for the developers of Prairie
West. motion raszed--,nani!"us J.
y� 7. Consideration of approving declaration of
protective covenants and
restrictions of the Evergreens.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed those items within the
protective covenants of the Evergreens that are not otherwise covered by
City Ordinances. Those restrictions include 1) the covenants limit the
number of cars on each property to four, 2) all lots abutting the mobile
home park shall have attached garages, 3) no earth homes shall be
permitted, 4) all houses shall have attached or detached garages shingled
and sided the same as the house, 5) exterior colors of homes shall be
limited to pastels and earth tones, 6) lawn establishment required within
one year of occupancy, and 7) no motor vehicles shall be kept or stored
upon the premises except those that are being driven and currently
licensed or registered.
A discussion then ensued regarding the enforceability of the protective
covenants. It was Dan Blonigen's concern that the City will be saddled
with enforcing these covenants. Blonigen noted that the covenants should
be consistent with City Ordinances and that the rules that apply to new
developments should apply to the entire city.
Brad Larson, representing Kent Kjollberg, informed Council that the
presence of the protective covenants can act as a marketing tool and can
provide the homeowner with assurances that, if necessary, he can take
civil action against individuals within the development that are not in
z
Council Minutes - 5/8/89
compliance with the covenants. He went on to note that the City can more
effectively assure compliance with the restrictions listed if such
restrictions are incorporated into the City Ordinances.
Fran Fair indicated support for establishing ordinance amendments that
would address some of the problems that the restrictive covenants attempt
to address. However, in lieu of those ordinances at this time, it was
her view that it is appropriate to approve the suggested restrictive
covenants.
After discussion, nation by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to
approve the declaration of protective covenants and restrictions of the
Evergreens. Motion carried unanimously.
Councilmember Anderson requested that staff make sure that the covenants
are properly recorded prior to sale of any of the lots associated with
phase I of the Evergreens. It was noted by staff that it is the
responsibility of the developer to record the covenants and that staff
will certainly make sure that this is done. In addition, the City has in
its possession an executed copy of the covenants; and if the developer
does not record the document, the City can act to do so.
Consideration of adopting Evergreens Development Agreement.
T,cci- - -atcr G`i:eiii biiafly reviewed rile developer agreement
and informed Council that Kent Kjellberg is selling the Evergreens
development to Wally Anderson of ARADCO. O'Neill went on to review the
background of the developer and informed Council that Anderson has
completed several successful developments in the metropolitan area. John
Badalich also noted that Wally Anderson is a reputable developer that his
company has worked with on numerous occasions. Staff recommended
adoption of the development agreement, as the agreement provides the City
with protection against some of the problems recently experienced with
other developments completed by private developers.
Fran Fair reviewed the resume of Wally Anderson and noted her support of
the development agreement, especially in light of the positive track
record of the buyer of the development.
After discussion, motion was made by warren Smith, seconded by Shirley
Anderson, to adopt the Evergreens Development Agreement. Motion carried
unanimously.
9. Consideration of final plat approval of phase I of the Evergreens
subdivision. Applicant, Kent Kjeiloerg.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that the final plat is
ready for approval subject to successful completion of the environnantai
assessment worksheet review process and subject to minor modifications of
the easement lines pending completion of pians and specifications for the
public improvements necessary with phase I.
1
9
Council Minutes - 5/8/89
After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Fran
Fair, to approve the final plat of phase I of the Evergreens subdivision
subject to successful completion of environmental assessment worksheet
review process and subject to necessary modifications of easement lines
associated with preparation of final plans for phase I public
improvements. Motion carried unanimously.
10. Consideration of rezoning agricultural land to residential and commercial
usage - Evergreens development.
Assistant Administrator reported that as part of the final approval
process of this subdivision, the land subdivided must be rezoned from the
present agricultural classification to a combination of residential
and/or business zoning classifications. Planning Commission recommended
that the entire residential area encompassed by the Evergreens be rezoned
from agricultural status to R-1. He went on to inform Council that
Planning Commission had also called for rezoning outlots A and B from
agricultural to 8-3 zoning. It was O'Neill's concern that the decision
to rezone Outlots A and B,from agricultural to business highway rezoning
might not be appropriate given language contained in the Comprehensive
Plan. O'Neill then suggested that Council table this matter, as this
particular rezoning request is not critical to the successful development
of the Evergreens subdivision.
After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley
{ Anderson, to approve the rezoning of the area encompassed by phases I-V
1. of the Evergreens subdivision. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to table rezoning
of Outlets A and 8 pending further review by the Planning Commission.
Motion carried unanimously.
11. consideration of ordering publication of notice of environmental
assessment worksheet comment period.
Motion made by warren Smith, seconded by Dan Dlonigen, to order
publication of notice of environmental assessment worksheet comment
period for the Evergreens development and declare Monticello as the
responsible governmental unit. Motion carried unanimously.
12. Consideration of adoptin Kjellberg Mobile Home Park East Development
Agreement and conaideration of approving expanaion or the K7ellberq East
Mobile Home Park.
O'Neill informed Council that the Kjellberg Eaot Mobile Home Park
Development Agreement and the Evergreens Development Agreement are
connected and that it is appropriate at this time to adopt the mobile .
home park development agreement, as Council has adopted the Evergreens
Development Agreement.
5
Council Minutes — 5/8/89
John Simla noted a problem in Article Three of the Mobile Rome Park
Developer Agreement which states that the east park sewer access charge
and water access charge shall be $225 per mobile home pad. Simola noted
that the access charge should include only the charge for sewer service
and that the proposal to include water in this access charge is not
appropriate. Brad Larson indicated that he would amend the language of
the developer agreement to include a requirement that Rjellberg will pay
the then prevailing fee for access to the city water system at such time
that the developer desires access to city water.
O'Neill also informed Council that Mr. Kjellberg requests permission to
expand the mobile home park, as plans are in place for extension of the
lateral connection from the southerly most point of phase I to the mobile
home park. O'Neill noted that it would be premature to allow expansion
of the park based on plans only and that expansion would only be
appropriate when the actual connection to the city system is in place.
Furthermore, the City has received no approvals from the PCA stating that
the existing treatment system is adequate to handle additional sewage.
Therefore, staff recommends that the expansion of the mobile home park
not be allowed until the proper approvals are gained from the Pollution
Control Agency or until such time that the park is actually hooked into
city services.
Motion made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to adopt
Kjellberg's Mobile Home Park East Developer Agreement and deny plans to
expand Mobile Home Park East. Council to consider allowing expansion
when appropriate approvals are in place. Motion carried unanimously.
13. Review and discuss plan of action designed to address concerns of Meadow
Oak resicents.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that City staff, along
with Ren Maus, met with Dickman Knutson and his son to discuss problems
highlighted by Meadow Oak residents. O'Neill outlined the general plan
of action developed at the meeting in response to the problems submitted
by Meadow Oak area residents. Council was informed that Mr. Knutson has
agreed to record the covenants against the 35 or so remaining lots in the
development area and that the covenants may be slightly modified to
incorporate restrictions that the City Council requested but were never
incorporated into the latest unrecorded version of the covenants.
Finally, he informed council that a meeting has been planned for
Wednesday, May 17, at 6:30 p.m., at which time area residents of Meadow
Oaks will be invited to discuss the covenants and other public nuisance
related problems with City staff and Dickman Knutson.
Fran Fair suggested that rewriting the covenants may be the wrong
approach to resolving the problems in the area and that the City might be
better off establishing ordinances in lieu of protective covenants.
Rhonda Thielen and her husband, Bruce, asked who is going to pay to
record the covenants that should have been recorded in the first place.
Mayor Maus indicated that this is an issue that could be addressed at the
meeting with Dickman Knutson scheduled for the 17th of May.
0
Council Minutes - 5/8/89
Rhonda Thielen indicated to Council that she does not have a problem with
the small recreation vehicles and boats parked in front lawns. However,
she feels strongly that an ordinance amendment is necessary that would
limit the size of recreation vehicles being parked in driveways. It was
her view that the RV's represent a safety hazard for individuals
attempting to back out of driveways adjacent to driveways that contain
large recreation vehicles that obstruct site lines.
It was the general consensus of Council that Council will review
potential ordinance amendments after the meeting of Friday, May 19, with
Meadow Oak area residents. A special workshop was established for May 19
at 1:00 p.m. at which time Council will discuss potential d3veiopment of
public nuisance related ordinances.
14. Consideration of approval of contract with Polka Dot Recycling for
curb -side recycling in the city of Monticello.
Motion by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Warren Smith, to approve the
contract for Polka Dot Recycling for the initial period of 36 months.
Motion carried unanimously.
15. Consideration of change order 42 for Project 88-01C, Pumphouse $3.
John Simola informed Council that on July 25, 1988, upon reviewing the
plans for purphouse 13, MinneSota Depart: nt Of ;realth reyueslc-J specific
changes in the design of the building and equipment. On September 14,
1988, OSM drafted a letter to Richmar Construction, Inc., requesting
proposals for a change order, including the work outlined by the
Minnesota Department of Health. Richmar Construction responded on
September 30, 1988, with a proposal for five changes and a more
economical type of fan for the chlorine room. The net effect of all the
changes is a credit of $ill for these items.
After discussion, a motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley
Anderson, to approve change order M2 for a credit of $111. Motion
carried unanimously.
16. Consideration of Council support requesting the Department of Revenue
hold a public hearing on 8 Troposed rule Change concerning valuation and
asaessilents or electric utl Sty companies.
City Administrator Wolfsteller informed Council that he is aware of a
Department of Revenue proposed rule adoption that will affect the
valuation and assessment of electric, gas distribution, and pipeline
companies, including the NSP plant in Monticello. He noted that although
none of the governing bodies such as school districts, local government
units, or county governments, were notified by the Department of Revenue
of this proposed change in their rules, these modifications proposed by
the Department of Revenue could affect the valuation of the power plants
and resulting tax revenues from them. The proposed rules would
automatically go into effect without a public hearing unless at least 25
q people submit a written request for a public hearing. Wolfsteller
J.
Council Minutes - 5/8/89
recommended that Council request the Department of Revenue hold a public
hearing; and once it's determined what effect this rule change would
have, the Council may want to consider even appropriating some funds for
supporting a lobbyist to fight any change that would materially affect
Monticello's tax base.
After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair,
to request that the Department of Revenue hold a public hearing on any
rule change that would affect the valuation and assessment of NSP and
authorize the Mayor and the City Administrator to request the same i -n
writing. Motion carried unanimously.
17. Consideration of one -day gambling license application - Monticello Lions
Club - July 2 celebration.
Motion by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to grant a one -day
gambling license application to Monticello Lions Club for the July 2
celebration. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Warren Smith, to allow the Lions
Club exclusive use of Ellison Park on July 2, 1989. Motion carried
unanimously.
18. Consideration of authorizing purchase of replacement motive water pump
for equalization basin.
Public Works Director Simola informed Council that the motive water pump
in the EQ basin mixes the waste water in the tank to get a homogenous
mass in the case of pR and high BOD loads, as well as assisting in odor
control in some aspects. Normally, the EQ basin is not used 100 percent
of the time, and the pump should last a long time. When the City
operated the plant, however, our operators used the EO basin as an
activated sludge aeration tank, and the pump was used extensively. This
may have caused is premature failure. Simola recommended that Council
authorize replacement of the motive water pump at a cost of $2,534.
Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to authori2e
replacement of the motive water pump from waldor Pump of Minneapolis for
a cost of $2,534. Motion carried unanimously.
19. Consideration of awarding Protect 89-1 to Channel Construction for the
improvement of Marvin Elwood Road extension and discussion of potential
assessment method.
Administrator Wolfstelier informed Council that the 89-1 Project involves
development of an extension of Marvin Elwood Road on a corner property
and that it has been City policy in the past to assess property owners of
corner lots only the cost of development of roadway on one side of the
property. In this situation, if the property owners are assessed the
full cost of this particular roadway, the cost to develop the roadway
would outweigh the benefit to the property; and therefore, the roadway
might not be constructed. council may wish to consider paying a portion
0
Council Minutes - 5/8/89
of the assessment cost, as the extension of the roadway does benefit the
area residents in the development and the extension does provide for
easier and more efficient snow removal in the area.
Motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, and carried
unanimously to contribute toward the cost to development of the extension
of Marvin Elwood Road and to limit the financial exposure of the
developer of phase I of the Meadows Second Addition to $8,500.
20. Consideration of adopting Meadows and Meadows Second Addition Developer
Agreement.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that the final draft of
the developer agreement was not available at this time, and the developer
and City staff request that Council table this matter until the next
regularly scheduled meeting.
Motion made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, to table adoption of
Meadows and Meadows Second Addition Developer Agreement pending further
Council review at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Monticello
City Council. Motion carried unanimously.
21. Consideration of granting final plat approval - Meadows Second Addition.
Applicant, value Plus Homes.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the developer had made the
adjustments to the preliminary plat as requested by Council and that the
final plat is ready for Council approval.
Motion was made by warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to grant
final approval of the final plat of the Meadows Second Addition. Motion
carried unanimously.
22. Public Hearing - Consideration of vacating streets and utility and
drainage easements.
O'Neill informed Council that upon acceptance of the final plat, Council
needs to vacate the streets and utility and drainage easements associates
with the original plat of the Meadows.
Motion wan made by warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to vacate
streets and utility and drainage easements associated with the original
plat of the Meadows. Motion carried unanimously.
23. Consideration of townhouse association to own and maintain sanitary sewer
main.
Cary Anderson reported to Council that staff recommends extension of the
existing sanitary sewer main to the northerly portion of the lot
containing the Fairway Court Townhouse units. Extension of this main
will allow the developer to avoid a spaghetti -like maze of water and
0
Council Minutes - 5/8/89
sewer utilities running to each of the townhouse units. It is proposed
that the extension include the sewer main only and would not include
extension of the water main. The water lines would include six
individual water lines run to each of the six townhouse units. Under
this scenerio, the Townhouse Association would be responsible for
maintaining the sanitary sewer main placed on the property. Dan Konigen
requested that the Townhouse Association ownership of the water main be
recorded on the deed to protect the City against potential
responsibilities associated with the sewer main on townhouse property.
After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Shirley
Anderson, to approve Townhouse Association ownership and maintenance of a
sanitary sewer main with the stipulation that the Association will record
responsibilities associated with this main on individual deeds. Motion
carried unanimously.
24. Other Matters.
Rick wolfsteller reviewed his efforts to get the most mileage possible
out of the existing copier systems. He went on to review the continuing
problems that staff has had with the existing machines and recommended
that Council allocate a minimum of $8,500 to purchase new equipment.
After discussion, motion by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to
authnrizn riry staff to roirchase a copy machine with c patil'tiec
sufficient to handle City needs. Mayor Maus is asked to review purchase
prior to finalization. Motion carried unanimously.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
I
10 O y
Council Agenda - 5/2/89
4. Public hearing on proposed improvements on Mississippi Drive. AND
Consideration of resolution ordering improvement, accepting bid, and
authorizing contract - Mississippi Drive. W .S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
This project consists of approximately 2,000 lineal feet of street
reconstruction on Mississippi Drive. The first 100 feet of the project
is being constructed along with the County Road 39 project. The next
approximately 800 feet of street will receive minor patching, subgrade
correction, and an overlay with the possibility of 200 feet of drain
tile.
The lower 1,140 feet of Mississippi Drive will receive major
reconstruction. The entire blacktop surface and base materials will be
removed along with some reworking of the subgrade. Drain tile is
expected to be installed along the southern edge; and the new street will
consist of geotextile filter fabric with 10 inches of class V and
3-1/2 inches of blacktop. In addition, approximately 200 feet of curbing
will be replaced in areas where settlement has occurred.
On the project there is approximately 3,775 lineal feet of assessable
property. This varies slightly as to how we treat the cul-de-sac area on
the west end and 'now we treat the side yards on the edat end. 3uhn
Badalich has estimated the total cost of the project to be in the
jU neighborhood of $133,240, including all engineering inspections, bond
5 � I fees, etc. This would give us a front footage assessment of $35.30 per
vQ �%} foot, or about $3,530 per 100 foot lot. The actual bids are due in
Monday, the 22nd, and we will present the actual low bidder information
at the meeting.
As we have discussed previously, there is certainly rationale in this
case to assess only 50 percent of the cost of this project, as the street
is being replaced prior to living a useful life. Thin is in accordance
with policies set forth in the City Ordinance. There is, however,
additional rationale in this case that the assessment be less than
50 percent, as the street really never served a useful life more than a
few years, and from a public works standpoint, there is rationale that
the City assess someplace between 20 percent and 50 percent, or say
35 percent. This would make the front footage cost $12.36, or an
assessment for a 100 -foot lot would be $1,236.
,y
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: ~--
1. The first alternative would be to close the public hearing, indicate
an assessment rate of 35 percent, and to pass a resolution ordering
the improvement.
2. The second alternative would be to close the public hearing, indicate
an assessment of 50 percent, and pass a resolution ordering the
improvement. 1,i r, u
MC
14
Council Agenda - 5/22/89
3. The third alternative could be to give an indication that the City
may assess at a higher rate than 50 percent. This would not be in
accordance with the assessment policy established by the City, and
most residents may not be in favor of such a project.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
As Public works Director, I favor alternative $1. However, I feel that
the project is quite costly and will withhold my recommendation until
after the bids are opened and more costs are determined.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Resolution for adoption will be available Monday after bids are opened;
Refer to feasibility study for the project submitted with a previous
Council agenda.
az
RESOLUTION 89 -
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT,
ACCEPTING BID, AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 24th day of April, 1989,
fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed improvement of Mississippi
Drive between East County Road 39 and its termination point.
WHEREAS, 10 days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing
was given, and the hearing was held thereon the 22nd day of March, 1989, at
which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard
thereon,
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of
Mississippi Drive, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law,
and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Project 89-02 Project 89-03 Grand
Mississippi Dr Oakwood Ind. Park Total
Buffalo Bituminous $87,409.65 $99,303.43 $186,713.08
Mid -Minnesota Hot Mix, Inc. $81,605.00 $139,778.00 $221,383.00
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Buffalo Bituminous is the lowest responsible
bidder jointly for both projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
1. The 89-02 improvement is hereby ordered as proposed.
2. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into the attached contract. with Buffalo Bituminous in the
name of the City of Monticello for the improvements to Mississippi
Drive according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by
the City Council and on file in the office of the City Administrator.
3. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return
forthwith to all bidders the deposit made with their bids, except
that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder
shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted by the City council this 22nd day of May, 1989.
City Admir.iatrator
I
Mayor
Council Agenda - 5/22/09
Public Hearing on proposed bituminous upgrading of Oakwood Industrial
Park roads. AND
Consideration of resolution ordering improvement, accepting bid, and
authorizing contract - Oakwood Industrial Park. W.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
This project consists of overlaying Thomas Park Drive, Chelsea Road
(between Oakwood Drive and Fallon), and Dundas Road (between Oakwood
Drive and Fallon). Subgrade correction is limited to a small portion on
Dundas and a small portion on Thomas Park Drive. After removing the
fabric from underneath the overlay area and deleting Fallon Avenue, the
engineer's estimate for the project is $195,610, including construction,
engineering, inspection, legal, and administrative fees. There is
approximately 7,545 lineal feet of overlay work. Of this, there are
1ti r G'1 approximately 12,500 assessable front feet, depending upon the method of
assessment chosen. This works out to $15.65 per front foot based upon
$ 1 the engineer's estimate. This would be $4,695 for a 300 -foot lot.
The proposed assessment rate is a little different in this area than
Mississippi Drive. In the Oakwood Industrial Park, the original plan was
to two-phase the streets, phase I for the 7 -ton design, phase II for the
9 -ton design. In the late 701s, the City realized that a nine -ton design
was ultimately needed out felt it wuuld be beitet to lave sura
development occur in the park prior to the burdening the owners with the
additional cost for the nine -ton street. Some development has occurred,
and a limited amount of heavy truck traffic is using the industrial
park. The streets in the industrial park are in the 12th year of their
20 -year design life and have shown some wear and tear along with
extensive rutting as is indicated by the Braun Engineering report. There
may not be a better time than now to do the proposed upgrading for the
following reasons:
1) The City expects the bids to be very attractive due to the large
volume of other work in our area thio year. This could result in
a 10-25 percent savings, depending upon the actual bids.
2) Cost of oil and construction are escalating each year.
3) The streets are currently in their 12th year of a 20 -year design
life. The last eight years will see a much more rapid
deterioration of the street system in the industrial park. If we
wait more than two or three years to do this improvement, the
existing street surfaces may not be suitable for overlay and
would have to be removed in their entirety. This alone could
double the cost of the job In the later years of the life cycle
of the pavement.
For some time, the Industrial Development Committee has felt that they
1 were at a disadvantage trying to sell an industrial park whooe roads were
not up to the industry standards. Although I believe they were not
-3-
Council Agenda - 5/22/89
advertising the fact that the roads were substandard for an industrial
park, when it came time to answer the question with prospective clients,
it was not an easy item for them to address. It is my understanding that
011ie will be getting some additional input from this group prior to
Monday evening's meeting.
Since the overlay at this time is phase II of the original project, there
is rationale that 100 percent of the cost should be charged to the
adjoining property. There is also some rationale that phase II, or the
nine or ten ton roads, is not needed in this area, as the traffic levels
are moderate at best, and strict enforcement of the load limits in the
spring would not essentially put anyone out of business who is currently
operating in the park. Therefore, there is some indication that if the
City wishes to have nine or ten ton roads, they should be willing to pay
a portion of the cost.
The bids for the project will be in on Monday, and we will have
additional information for the Council concerning the actual costs.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to, at the close of the public
hearing, review the bids and pass a resolution ordering the
improvement project indicating an assessment rate of 100 percent to
benefiting property owners.
2. The second alternative would be to, at the close of the public
hearing, review the bids and order the proposed improvement at less
than 100 percent as determined by the City Council.
3. The third alternative would be, at the close of the public hearing,
to not order the improvement but to put it on hold for a year or two
or revive it at such time there is more interest in the project or it
to needed for a single development or industrial complex.
C. b"1ANP RECOMMENDATION:
As Public Works Director, it seems most appropriate to overlay these
streets within the next couple of years before significant deterioration
sets in prohibiting overlays. It is easy to see, however, that thio may
be a burden for existing undeveloped properties in the industrial park.
What those individuals may not realize, however, is that complete
replacement of this roadway system in the future could be a greater
burden. It is hoped that the bids will come in more attractive than the
engineer's estimate and make this project more appealing to the existing
property owners in the industrial park. If not, and the project
temporarily falls through, I would recommend that it be reviewed annually
and that the project go ahead prior to further detertoriation. This
could be within the next two years and at a significantly higher cost
than today.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Resolution for adoption will be available Monday after bids are opened
Please refer to the information presented with a previous agenda
supplement.
-4-
A
Council Agenda - 5/22/89
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Consideration of resolution ordering improvement, accepting bid, and
authorizing contract - Oakwood Industrial Park. (O.K.)
The Industrial Development Committee earmarked the potential need to
upgrade the industrial park roads as a result of the roads being posted
at 7 -ton axle limit in the spring. It becomes difficult to market
industrial land to potential industries who assume the industrial roads
meet standard city, county, or state requirements and thereafter find out
differently (avoids unnecessary surprises and embarrassment). Many of
our current businesses in the industrial park purchased their property
when the axle ton limits were 7 -ton, or purchased their property
thereafter with the assumption that the roads met the standard
requirements, and pay property taxes based on industrial/commercial tax
classification percentages. The IDC understands the dilemma of the
current property owners, however, it also sees the potential cost
effectiveness of upgrading the park roads prior to further deterioration
and to avoid potential future construction cost increases.
The IDC encourages the City Council to consider upgrading the Oakwood
Industrial Park roads to 10 -ton all weather roads because 1) of the
potential cost effectiveness, 2) to increase the market strategy of the
industrial land; 3) avoid future unnecessary surprises and embarrassment;
and 5) to consider the increased traffic on Chelsea Riad with the
completed extension to County Road 118. In reality of today's
requirements of the industrial park roads are of residential design, not
of industrial design.
-48-
orr
n schekn
2011 Ea [ I lennepm Avenue
Mmncapiills, MN 55413
b 12331-8650
FAX 3313806
Cng1n to
S.—ynn
Planners
May 22, 1989
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Attn: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
RE: Road Improvements and Appurtenant Work
Project Nos. 89-02 and 89-03
OSM Comm. Nos. 2621 and 4374
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
This morning at 11:00 a.m., two bids were received and opened for the referenced
projects. The bids received for both projects totaled $186,713.08 and $221,383.00.
The engineer's estimate was $257,946. The low bid is within the project budget and
appears responsive.
Both bids were checked by OSM. A certified copy of the bid tabulation is enclosed
for your information.
We recommend award of the total base bid in the amount of $186,713.08, consisting
of Project No. 89.02, Mississippi Drive in the amount of $87,409.65 and Project 89-
03, Oakwood Industrial Park Road in the amount of $99,303.43 to Buffalo Bituminous,
Inc., Box 357, Buffalo, MN 55131, being the lowest responsvie bidder for the
combined projects.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
%ASSOCIA,JES,INC.^
JA
I John P((.BBadal ich, P.E.
/City Engineer
/lmt
Enclosure
cc: Buffalo Bituminous, Inc.
E.H. Anderson, P.E.
I gWl(In% hlunny l mr%,rl C-01
7ARU.ATION OF BIDS
ROAD IIOR00FJ'EfT A40 APMTEMNT WOW
MISSISSIPPI DRIVE ROAD and MALE tMOUSTRIAL PARK 1MPRO417EMTS
PROJECT NO. 89.01 AND 89-03
f Ne
C11. OF "OtITICSLIA. 4 IRT COAITY. MINNESOTA
RIDS OPENED : MAY 27. 1989 at 11:00.4.14.
TOTAL St74 M A .......................................................1 3021915.80
SCNEOUE B - OA1,'DkF, IMUSTRIAL PARK ROAD IrPROVEMENT • P%F..CT NO. 89-03
F!OINEERS ESTI"ATF, FTJFFAI.O PITIJMING(TS.INC. MIO-M:N4ESOTA ROT MIX
SEC
L.S.
2.962.00
7.967.00
07021 CLEAN IMP
1
L.S.
INC .
2,0~2.00
NO. ITFM DISCRIPTION "4TITV
__��_��_�
OMIT
WT PRIrF TOTAL PR1Cr 19NIT PRICE T(1TAI. PRICE UNIT PRIrJE TOM. PRICE.
•--__•�--�_��__
.tee=aaee=a_-=
9XDA E A - M1551SSIP1 DRIVE MAD - PROF.CT NO.
__��-__----'----'=-:a:=e
80-02
02111 Ar4RFGATF LASS 5 (SOP"IND 6 BASF,)
IBM
TON
=_
10,300.00
=e_�-=
100
02021 MPII.I7ATIDN
I
L.S.
1.979.15
1.979.15
1.00
I.m
500.0
100,00
0:021 CLEAN LIP
I
L.S.
1.979,15
1.979.15
1.00
1.00
2.000.00
2,(100,00
02104 RFW. CURB AND WITEe
%10
L. F.
2.00
600.00
2.00
600.00
3.00
900,00
02104 REMOVE BiTIYIIKnJS Sffkc- ( M. SAW)
4100
S. Y.
4.0
M7.:NOO.nO
1.00
4.IA0.00
0.90
3.600.00
02105 COMMON EXCAVATION
Ii00
C.Y.
2.00
.1.:00.00
?.25
5.:00.00
3.01
4.800.00
O -"II ACOFGATCftASS 5 (SHMLOER:40 6 BASEI
:6r0
TOM
6.00
15. AM, 00
4.50
11,701.On
4.50
111700.011
Orr MILL 81TUM TNOUS SLIRFACE
4"0
S. Y.
3.00
1.590.0
?.00
I.nAO.M
1.50
795,0
02331 RITTF.INOUS RASE (INCL. BIT. MATEQIALI
550
TOM
22.00
17.10.0
19.10
10.725,0
74.00
13,200.OD
02141 BITUMINOUS HEAR MOO. (I'NCI., BIT. M4TWAL)
t.SA
TOM
25.0
1k.?50.00
!9.50
M21h75.on
?4.00
16.250.00
02357 BiT'JAIM PATFR14L FOR TACK COAT
3311
GAL.
1.00
~37.00
I.nO
330.00
I.On
334,00
02411 SLIRMDIWTABI.E CONCRETE CLIRB AND GIM
10n
1 F.
8.0
?.40.0
•6.0
t•E00.0
in -An
3.00,0
02506 AT)JIST MAWXES
3
EACH
140.00
450.00
150.00
450.00
150.0
450.00
02574 SM INCL. 4' BLACK DIRT
_000
S.Y.
O!.Oo
2.00
41000.00
2.50
5.000.00
07621 TRENCH DRAIN W/8• PERF. PIPE, ROCK 6 FABRIC
1?40
L. F.
:0.00
261900.00
18.25
:41455.00
5.50
7,370.00 1
02671 STANDARD STORM SFWFR MAN+01.E
%
EAfTN
1.000.00
6,OnD.00
IOOO.M
6.000.00
1.000.0
61000.(4)
02511 4* R.C.P. CLASS 11
35
L.F
35. GO
1.225.M
30.00
1.040.(0
72.00
1.120.00
S" HOTEKTLE FILTER FABRIC
4340
S.Y.
0.74
3.261.50
1.00
4.350.(81
STD STREET SWEEPING
0,15
PRE
750.00
II2.50
1.0
0.15
1.000.00
150,00
TOTAL St74 M A .......................................................1 3021915.80
SCNEOUE B - OA1,'DkF, IMUSTRIAL PARK ROAD IrPROVEMENT • P%F..CT NO. 89-03
02021 MOBILIZATTOM
1
L.S.
2.962.00
7.967.00
07021 CLEAN IMP
1
L.S.
2,962.00
2,0~2.00
07104 REMOVE BITI.MIhW SURFACE (INCL. SAW)
1150
S. Y.
4.00
4.601.00
02111 Ar4RFGATF LASS 5 (SOP"IND 6 BASF,)
IBM
TON
6. On
10,300.00
02232 MILL BITUMINOUS SIFFACE
100
S. V.
3.00
3OO.M
02731 BITUMINOUS BASF. (IMCL. BIT. MATFRIALI
150
TON
?2.00
5.300.00
02341 PITUMINCJ3 WA (INR;. BIT. MATERIA
4000
Tom
24.00
961000.00
02341 BITUMINOUS WEAR 10. (10.. BIT. MATF,RIALI
400
TON
^4.0
221400.(10
02357 BITUMINOIIB MATERIAL FOR TACK )DAT
13M
GALLON
1.00
1.800.00
07506 AO,UST MOWS
21
FACT
150.00
31150.00
02506 ADJUST GATE VALVES
31
EACH
10.0
3.300.00
STB GTREET SYEEPIND
1.43
MILE
750.00
1.072.50
TOTAL SCHEDULE B ...................................................... d 154.946, 44
GRAND TOTAL BASE BID (Sl7EDLLF9 •A• AFD'B')...........................1 757.862.10
�, ronotes Corrected Figure
Nee i of 1 2621.20 1 4314.00
uuumsa pauamu
1 07,4097 1 81. W51m
1.00 1,00 500.00 500.00
1.0 1.00 3, 00.00 3.000.00
2.00 %3nO.0 0.90 1.035.00
4.50 8.100.00 4.5A 81100.00
2.01 200.0 2.00 700.00
16.00 4.000.00 24.00 6.000.00
16.00 64.00.00 73.00 92.Om. On
16.0 14.400.0 24.0 21,60.0
0.39) 9M.00 1.110 11800.00
100.00 2,100.00 100.00 2.100.0
100.0 3,300.00 100.00 3,300.00
1.01 1.43 inO.On 143.0
1 99.31.43 1 139.778.00
1 186,713.011 1 921.383.00
1 hereby certify that this i9 4 true and
carrert tabulation of the lids 4a received
on I Mar 72, 1989
MAn �. Gdslich,P.E.
RESOLUTION 89 -
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT,
ACCEPTING BID, AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 24th of April, 1989,
fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed improvements of Thomas Park
Drive, Chelsea Road (from Oakwood Drive to Fallon Avenue), and Dundas Road
(from Oakwood Drive to Fallon Avenue), with bituminous overlay to increase load
carrying capacity,
WHEREAS, 10 days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing
was given, and the hearing was held thereon the 22nd day of May, 1989, at which
all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon,
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of Thomas
Park Drive, Chelsea Road, and Dundas Road with bituminous overlay, bids were
received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were
received complying with the advertisement:
Project 89-02 Project 89-03 Grand
Mississippi Or Oakwood Ind. Park Total
Buffalo Bituminous $87,409.65 $99,303.43 $186,713.08
Mid -Minnesota Hot Mix, Inc. $81,605.00 $139,778.00 $221,383.00
ANT) WHEREA.^,, it nnpeArs that Buffalo Bitumincuz is the lowest resp,nsible
bidder jointly for both projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
1. The 89-03 improvement is hereby ordered as proposed.
2. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into the attached contract with Buffalo Bituminous in the
name of the City of Monticello for the improvements to Thomas Park
Drive, Chelsea Road, and Dundae Road according to the plans and
specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in
the office of City Administrator.
3. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return
forthwith to all bidders the deposit made with their bids, except
that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder
shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of May, 1989.
Mayor
City Administrator
J OYNER LANES MONTICELLO, Inc.
1 i P.O. Box 246 — Monticello, Minn. 55362
TO: Mayor Maus and Council members DATE: May 19, 1989
City of Monticello
FROM: Al Joyner - Joyner lanes
RE: (1) Chelsea Road Improvement and Assessment
(2) lot Development in Orderly Annexation Area
If Chelsea Road needs improvement, that is one decision. The other part of the
question is payment. Inasmuch as a formula has been set by the improvement of
Main Street (80% Ad Valorem a 20% Special Assessment), then I would suggest
continuing with that formula on Chelsea, if it is improved.
The platting and land development being done in the OAA seems to be a conflict
In terms. A street constructed to a rural development cross section hardly
seems fitting for a city street. Lots that are so huge that no one can
afford storm sewer assessment (usually assessed on a square foot basis) at a
later date, just invites special treatment and political assessment rolls (such
as Big lake).
As a concerned citizen, I would suggest an immediate moratorium on platting
in the township, and then institute platting plans that would be compatible
with city planning.
Pie shaped 10 -acre lots will surely be sub -divided in years to come and can
only cause a future council much misery.
A. The council could demand utilities in all OAA development (storm, sanitary and
water), and that would resolve the problem immediately.
B. Tho council could require alternate building sites be established now on
larger lots and then when the utilities are installed, the extra lot, or lots,
could be subdivided or not, as the owner wished.
All things considered, option "A" most likely would be the moot practical and
cost Via city the least.
_ tSf
Council Agenda - 5/22/89
8. Consideration of final plat approval - Country Club ODurt. Applicant,
Floyd Markling. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Staff recommends that the Monticello Country Club Court final plat be
approved by Council, as a major update has been made to the preliminary
plat which now makes the plat acceptable to the City. As you may recall,
there was a problem with the preliminary plat, as the drainage and
utility easements through the center of the property were not in place.
The final plat that is before you for your consideration does now include
the drainage and utility easements necessary to provide the City with
access to the water and sewer lines that extend through the property and
terminate at the north end of the property near the golf course
property.
Staff has reviewed the final plat and finds that it is consistent and in
compliance with City Ordinance. Please note that the Planning Commission
has not reviewed the final plat prior to your decision. According to the
Subdivision Ordinance, final plat review by the Planning Commission is
not necessary unless the Council deems so.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
J. Motion to approve the final plat of Country Cluo Court.
2. Motion to deny final plat approval of Country Club Court.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative O1. Inclusion of the proper easement lines
on the final plat pave the way for Council approval of this final plat.
Staff sees no reasons why the final plat approval should be denied.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the final plat of the Monticello Country Club Court.
it
i �! •�� `er.� �\E .n rad s ,i:.. �
1 to Or .•�o S• �•�•� S+`' � ••�� $ ... '�= S1 � l�•! ���, ? �_�
siacx _ ONE ,
!l;
V l�
lOM 1100 a {•tOi,.wt 111.{.....•'• y t —
N!2 l� .
LOR tANO SMEYORS„ INC.
KttcO. rrxwttrrt i, l� •� `{�`'�I
Council Agenda - 5/22/89
9. Consideration of allowing Monticello Jaycees to use West Bridge Park for
teen dance - July 1, 1989. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
In conjunction with the Riverfest Celebration last year, the Monticello
Jaycees sponsored a teen dance and, I believe, a car show in the West
Bridge Park. The Council authorized the usage of the park for this
purpose, and I am not aware of any problems occurring last year.
The Jaycees again would like to sponsor a dance from 7:00 p.m. to
11:00 p.m. on July 1 and are requesting permission to use the West Bridge
Park. The Jaycees would not be having any beer sales but would like to
use the concession stand building. Previous to the usage of West Bridge
Park, the Jaycees have sponsored a dance and utilized one of the downtown
parking lots but would prefer the West Bridge Park location.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Allow the Jaycees to use West Bridge Park on July 1 from 7:00 p.m. to
11:00 p.m. and also the concession stand building.
2. Do not allow usage of the park for the teen dance.
L. �I'A!'P ItFXJUMMGNUA'1'iUN:
( Not being aware of any problems in the past for the dances sponsored by
the Jaycees, the staff finds no reason not to support their request.
Jaycee members have also indicated they will be hiring off-duty police
officers to help in crowd control, etc.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
-6-
Council Agenda - 5/22/B9
10. Consideration of developer agreement - Phase I - Meadows Second Addition.
(J .0. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Enclosed is a copy of the developer agreement for phase I of. the Meadows
Second Addition. As noted earlier, this document is very similar to the
Evergreens Development Agreement which you reviewed at the previous
Council meeting. There are, however, a few changes to this particular
developer agreement which reflect the differences between the Evergreens
development and this particular development. In the summary of the
agreement below, please review Article 4 closely, as the requirements
contained within it regarding the financial gaurantee are not completely
consistent with the comparable requirement in the Evergreens Development
agreement.
Staff recommends adoption of the developer agreement, as it is our view
that it sufficiently protects the City's interest with regards to
development of the Meadows Second Addition. The following report
provides an article by article recap of significant items covering the
agreement, and it also highlights those serr.ions that Are significantly
different than the Evergreens Developer Agreement.
Article 1: Before work is commenced, all plans and specifications must
oe approved ny the city.
Article 2: No construction shall commence and no building permits shall
6e—Iosu33 before plat of record and all financial considerations are in
place.
Article 3: The City will provide full-time inspection of the improvement
ud�r�ttie time the work is performed. It should be noted, however, that
staff will be working diligently with the developer to coordinate
schedules and make every effort to provide inspection only when necessary
so that costs can be kept to a minimum.
Article 5: City shall release the guarantee in a sum equal to estimated
costs an7 improvements so completed prior to acceptance of the final
plat. In no event shall the City release an amount equal to or greater
than 25 percent of project cost prior to the expiration of the warranty
period unless the project is fully completed and bonded in an amount
equal to the full cost of the project.
Article 6: Warranties and bonds provided by subcontractors must identify
tii a Cicy as a third party beneficiary.
Article 7: Developer shall deposit with the City a separate cash deposit
or eng neering, City staff administration, construction and inspection,
soil borings, and erosion and siltation control. These funds will be
used to pay for City costs associated with actual construction. This
deposit is refundable to the developer in the event the funds are not
expended by the City.
-7-
Council Agenda - 5/22/89
Article 10: This article indemnifies the City against any loss,
including suit and reasonable attorney fees, incurred on account of
injury or death of any person that may have been related to the work
mentioned in the agreement. It also requires that the developer provide
to the City general public liability and property damage insurance. The
developer, at hie own expense, shall install street lighting in
accordance with Northern States Power requirements, City policy, and
specifications at City's direction.
Article 12: The developer shall install traffic and street signs.
Article 13: The developer shall place iron monuments in all lot and
block corners and at all other angle points and boundary lines.
Article 14: Developer's engineer shall furnish an affidavit stating that
the site grading was done in accordance with the grading plan.
Article 15: This article includes language that binds future owners of
the property to this agreement.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve developer agreement.
2. Motion to modify and approve deveiuper dyeeemeuL.
3. Motion to deny adoption of developer agreement.
C. STAPP RECOMFIENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the developer agreement with modifications
resulting from the discussion pertaining to required financial
guarantees.
ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION
If Council elects to adopt the developer agreement with the 100%
guarantee, a motion should be made which indicates the threshold at which
a project guarantee increases to 125% of project cost. It is suggested
that a construction cost of $200,000 be established as the threshold
amount. Projects exceeding this amount must provide a guarantee of 125%
of project cost, with projects less than this amount providing a
guarantee of 100% of project cost.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of phase I of the Meadows Second Addition Developer Agreement.
-a-
THE MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1989, by and
between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, hereinafter referred to as the
"City" and VALUE PLUS HOMES, represented by Tom Holthaus, Steve Holker, and
Matt Balker, its successors and assigns, hereinafter referred to as the
"Developer."
WHEREAS, the Developer has submitted a written request to the City as outlined
in the preliminary plat application entitled "THE MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION" for
the platting and development, hereinafter referred to as the "Development", of
the following described property located in the City of Monticello, County of
Wright, State of Minnesota, to -wit:
WHEREAS, the parties desire that the Development, known as "THE MEADOWS SECOND
ADDITION", utilize city sewer and water service.
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested the extension of sewer service to the
Development.
WHEREAS, the parties desire that municipal water lines, sanitary sewer lines,
concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfaced streets, and other improvements
hereinafter described, be cunstr%.cted within "Tl3u' :;Lw^O.i SEL'C:.'D AZDITION—
development phased in three additions.
NOW. THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made
herein,
IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO that the Developer will
forthwith employ at its expense a contractor or contractors, approved by the
City, who will construct municipal water line and sanitary and sewer lines,
concrete curb and gutter, and bituminous surfaced streets within the
Development.
IT IS ALSO AGREED:
ARTICLE ONE - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The Developer shall, at its own expense, forthwith, construct the improvements
mentioned above. Before the work is commenced, the Developer shall obtain
written approval of the City staff and Engineer of the plans and
specifications, including landscape plans, for the work which Shall be prepared
by the Developer, at its own expense, in accordance with the City's Engineering
guidelines as outlined in the Monticello Design Criteria Manual. Soil borings
shall be provided as recommended by the City Engineer and the Developer's
engineer jointly.
After completion of the work, the Developer's engineer, under the direction of
the City Engineer or his assignee, shall prepare all ss -built drawings of the
4 improvements mentioned above in the original mylars. In case of any dispute as
to what is meant by the plans and specifications, the decision of the City
G
r
The Meadows Second Addition
Development Agreement
Page 2
engineer shall control. One set of reproducible plans (mylars) and three (3)
sets of the as -built blue line plans shall be delivered to the City by the
Developer's Engineer. The Developer shall notify the City of the names and
addresses of all the engineers who assist the Developer in the project.
All plans for connection to City water service shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to construction of connecting water lines.
ARTICLE TWO - BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Developer shall not commence construction of any building on a lot in the
Development until all bonds or security agreements required by this Development
Contract have been filed and accepted by the City, and until all legal,
administrative, and engineering expenses then due have been paid, and also
until the final plat of the Development has been filed, along with all
restrictive convenants and conveyances, with the Wright County Recorder or
Registrar of Titles, as the case may be. A copy of all conveyances and
restrictive covenants shall be sent to the City Attorney by the title company,
if any, as proof that they were filed or recorded. Developer shall provide a
copy of the approved final plat and a copy of the updated abstract for the City
Attorney to complete a title search. Five copies of the final plat shall be
submitted to the City at the time that the plat is signed by the City for
fi' ing aL ...:ght County.
NO CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMMENCE AND NO BUILDING PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED
BEFORE PIAT OF RECORD AND ALL FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS ARE IN PLACE.
The final design cross-section of each class of street or roadway is to be in
conformance with the requirements for each class or rcadway as contained in the
Monticello Design Criteria Manual.
ARTICLE THREE - INSPECTION
The City will provide full-time inspection of the improvements during the time
the work is being performs The City will charge against the deposit for
these and other services at an hourly rate of $50.00. Total cost of inspection
of project improvements is dependent on the time to complete such inspection.
It is recommended that detailed work schedules be provided so that the
inspection costs can be kept to a minimum.
ARTICLE FOUR - CONSTRUCTION GUARANTEES
This agreement is conditioned upon and subject to the Developer posting with
the City a financial guarantee in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%)
of the total estimated construction cost for the improvements and the estimated
indirect costs in the form of a cash deposit outlined in Article Six as to each
phase.
6O)
The Meadows Second Addition
Development Agreement
Page 3
The financial guarantee has been determined for all improvements included in
this contract as set forth in Exhibit 1 and is incorporated herein as if set
forth in full.
The financial guarantee may be in the form of a cash deposit, a bond, or
irrevocable letter of credit approved by the City. If cash, deposited in an
interest bearing account in favor of Developer and City under Developer's
social security number. A financial guarantee shall be written in favor of the
City and be used for or to provide for the payment, as payments become due, of
all just claims for work, tools, machinery, skill, materials, insurance
premiums, equipment and supplies for the completion of the work and for saving
the City harmless from all costs that may accrue on account of the doing of the
work by the Developer or its agent or to pay the City in the event the City
must complete such work, to also insure that the improvements function as
intended for their purpose in accordance with the standards established by the
City Engineer, and for the costs of enforcing the standards established by the
City Engineer and for the costs of enforcing the terms of the bond if action is
brought thereon, including reasonable attorney's fees.
ARTICLE FIVE - RELEASE OF GUARANTEE
The City Council shall not accept dedication of required improvements, nor
release, nor reduce f:^-Incia1 guarantee until the Clty EII911teeL ildd submitted a
certificate stating that all required improvements have been satisfactorily
completed and until the applicant's engineer or surveyor has certified to the
Engineer, through submission of detailed "as -built" plans, survey plat of the
subdivision, indicating location, dimensions, materials, and other information
required by the City Council or Engineer, that the layout of the line and grade
of all public improvements is in accordance with construction plans for the
subdivision, and that the improvements are completed, are ready for acceptance
by the City, and are free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances.
Upon such approval and recommendation, the City Council shall thereafter accept
the improvements for dedication in accordance with the established procedure.
Upon the request of the Developer, the amount of the guarantee shall be reduced
in a sum equal to the estimated cost of the improvements so completed prior to
acceptance of the final plat. The financial guarantee shall be reduced upon
act-.ial acceptance of the portion of the improvements completed upon
recommendation by the City Engineer, and then only to the ratio that the cost
of public improvement dedicated bears to the total cost of the public
improvements for the plat. For purposes of showing payment, the Developer's
engineer shall submit to the City payment estimates, along with lien waivers,
for the work done. All reductions of the financial guarantee must also be
authorized by the Developer or its agent and the financing institution, if any.
In no event shall the City release an amount equal to or greater than 25% of
project coats prior to the expiration of the warranty period unless the project
is fully completed and bonded in an amount equal to the full cost of the
project.
The Meadows Second Addition
Development Agreement
Page 4
Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of developer contracts being
considered for retention by the Developer for the performance of the work
required of the contractor.
Any changes to the approved plans and specifications shall be approved by the
City Engineer in writing before they are made.
The Developer will be responsible for not only plans and specifications
preparation, but also for providing construction staking of said improvement.
All sanitary sewer and water main testing shall be completed and copies of
service ties submitted to the City prior to issuance of any service connection
permits.
SARTICLE SIX - WARRAN`Y�
After acceptance by the City, the Developer warrants and guarantees that the
improvements constructed will be free from defects in materials and workmanship
that may occur within one (1) year from the date the City accepts them.
WARRANTIES AND BONDS PROVIDED BY SUBCONTRP.CTORS MUST IDENTIFY THE CITY AS A
THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY. Twenty-five percent (259) of the total construction
cost shall be held by the City until all items to be corrected have been
tis:ied undc. warrant! c: _.._:1 exp:. -_4c:: cf the warza. ty, ;hlchc
:c: occ,4rz
later.
Guarantee Period: If within the time prescribed by law or by the terms of any
applicable special guarantees required by the Contract Documents any of the
work is found to be defective or not in accordance with the Contract Documents,
the Developer shall correct it promptly after receipt of written notice from
the City to do so unless the City has previously given the Developer a specific
written acceptance of the particular defective or nonconforming condition. The
City shall give prompt notice to the Developer after discovery of the
condition.
ARTICLE SEVEN - DEPOSIT
The Developer shall, prior to the commencement of the work, deposit with the
City separate cash deposit for the following items:
AJ Engineering construction review and warranty inspection computed at
1-1/29 of construction cost (fixed fee)
C1 City Staff Administration
19 of construction cost (fixed fee)
C. Construction inspection and plan review �•s'
49 of construction cost.
D. $250.00 cash for erosion and siltation control (on deposit)
The Meadow Second Addition
Development Agreement.
Page 5
If, as the work progresses, the cash deposit becomes depleted, then Developer
shall deposit additional funds in the escrar account as directed by the City.
The City reserves the right to raise the fees for Items A and C if final
construction costs are above the original estimate. City shall document costs
associated with A and C and any surplus shall be refunded to Developer. The
separate cash deposits shall be set forth in Exhibit 1, which exhibit is
incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
ARTICLE EIGHT - CLEAN-UP
The Developer shall keep the premises free from accumulation of waste
materials, rubbish, and other debris resulting from the work; and at the
completion of the work, it will remove all waste materials, rubbish, and debris
from and about the premises as well as all tools, construction equipment,
machinery and surplus materials, and will leave the site clean and in a
condition as approved by the City Engineer.
ARTICLE NINE - OTHER GOVERNING BODIES
No utilities and street work shall be done until the Minnesota Health
Department approves watermain plans and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
approves the newer plans. The plans and specifications shall be approved by
stato and 1 :cal agcncien ac required (i.e. as epartm-antV.::atur ..
. Resurce ,
Wright County Highway Department, Minnesota Department of Transportation,
Watershed Management Organizations, etc.).
The Developer shall pay for all costs of temporary and permanent relocations of
public utility facilities while constructing any portion of the improvements.
ARTICLE TEN - CITY DISCLAIMER/LIABILITY INSURANCE
The Developer shall indemnify the City against any loss, including suit costs
and reasonable attorney's fees, incurred on account of injury or death of
persona that may have been related to the work mentioned in the agreement, on
account of damage or destruction of property that may have been related to the
work mentioned in this agreement. The Developer, at its expense, agreed to
repair or replace property damaged, by reason of the work, that belongs to
others.
The Developer shall provide to the City, at the Developer's expense, general
public liability and property damage insurance, protecting the City and the
Developer from all claims for personal injury, including death, and all claims
for destruction of or damage to property, arising out of or in connection with
any operations under these contract documents, whether such operations be by
the Developer, its contractor, or by any subcontractor, or anyone directly or
indirectly employed by the contractor or by a subcontractor under him.
Insurance shall be written with a limit of liability of not less than $600,000
for all damages arising out of bodily injury, including death, at any time
7 resulting therefrom, sustained by any one person in any one accident, and a
limit of liability of not less than $1,000,000.00 for any such damage sustained
t
The Meadows Second Addition
Development Agreement
Page 6
by two or more persons in any one accident. Insurance shall be written with a
limit of liability of not less than $300,000 for all property damage sustained
by one person in any one accident; and a limit of liability of not less than
$600,000 for any such damage sustained by two or more persons in any one
accident. The insurance policies shall accompany the contract for its
execution by the Developer and the City of Monticello. The above insurance
policies shall be in full force and effect during the life of this coritract
whether or not the improvements have yet been accepted and any warranty
periods.
ARTICLE ELEVEN - STREET LIGHTING
The Developer, at his own expense, shall install street lighting in accordance
with Northern States Power requirements, City policy, and specifications at the
City's direction.
ARTICLE TWELVE - TRAFFIC AND STREET SIGNS
The Developer, at his own expense, shall install traffic and street signs as
directed in writing by the City Public Works Director. No occupancy permits
are to be issued until street signs have been installed. Within forty-five
(45) days of signing the agreement, the City shall provide written
Z-'ecificationc raid signage.
ARTICLE THIRTEEN - MONUMENTATION/WARRANTIES OF TITLE
The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot and block corners and at
all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron monuments shall be placed after
all streets and lawn grading has been completed in order to preserve the lot
markers for future property owners. The Developer shall also provide a minimum
of one monument within the Development, set in concrete, for horizontal and
vertical control for the City's benchmark syutem. More monuments may be
required by the City Engineer to serve the area. The Developer's land surveyor
shall furnish the City an affidavit that all iron monuments were placed as
stated above.
Developer warrants marketability of title to all real estate interests conveyed
or to be conveyed hereunder. A title opinion shall be submitted with final
plat of The Meadows Second Addition as to th•e condition of title along with a
warranty deed for park land transfer.
ARTICLE FOURTEEN - CERTIFICATION OF SITE GRADING
Prior to the acceptance of the completed subdivision by the City, the
Developer's engineer shall furnish an affidavit stating that the site grading
was done in accordance with the grading plan as approved by the City within
limits acceptable to the City Engineer.
The Meadows Second Addition
Development Agreement
Page 7
ARTICLE FIFTEEN - BINDING EFFECT
The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit
of the heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto
and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the
subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. References j A'
made herein to the Developer, if there be more than one,0..6nd
1 each and 7
all of them. This Agreement, at the option of the City,e placed ons
record so as to give notice hereof to subsequent purchasencumbrances of
all or any part of the subdivision and all recording fees, if any, shall be
paid by the Developer.
ARTICLE SIXTEEN - ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
Upon completion of all the work required, the City Engineer or his delegated
representative, a representative of the Contractor, and representative of the
Developer's engineer, will make a final inspection of the work. Before the
final acceptance is made by the City Council for perpetual maintenance, the
City Engineer shall be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in
accordance with the approved plans and specifications and City standards.
Final acceptance of said work for perpetual maintenance shall be made by
resolution of the City Council upon the recommendation of the City Engineer.
0/0
The Meadows Second Addition
Development Agreement
Y Page 8
IH WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands the day and year
above mentioned.
CITY OF MONTICELLO VALUE PLUS HOMES
Kenneth Maus, Mayor Tom Holthaus
Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator Steve Holker
Matt Holker
(CITY)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) as.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrunt aac ackr.V...cdgcd hefore ..—a thl's 011
1989, by Kenneth Maus,Mayor, and Rick Wolfsteller, City AMErnnistrator, of thel
City of Monticello, Minnesota, on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
(DEVELOPER)
NATE OF MINI:ESOTA 1
) as.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 1989, by Tom Holthaus, Steve Holker, an�Matt Holker, owners
Of value Plus Homes.
Notary Public
11
EXHIBIT 1
THE MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION
PHASE I
ARTICLE FOUR - CONSTRUCTION GUARANTEES
The financial guarantee has been determined for all improvements included in
this contract for THE MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION as follows:
CONSTRUCTION COST GUARANTEE GUARANTEE
1008
ARTICLE SEVEN - DEPOSIT
The Developer shall, prior to the commencement of the work, deposit with the
City separate cash deposit for the following items:
A. Engineering construction review and warranty inspection computed at
1-1/28 of construction cost (fixed fee)
B. City Staff Administration
18 of construction cost (fixed fee)
C. Construction inspection and plan review
48 of construction cost
D. $250
r4TI..LE TE,; - Dj%1.:'IC;: OF ;rrn-.^:
The Developer shall cause construction of the municipal water, sanitary and
storm sewer and street improvements to commence no later than
, and the construction of the municipal water, sanitary
and storm sewer and street improvements shall be completed on or before
Any extension shall be requested by the
Developer in writing and approved by the City Council prior to the completion
date above. In the event that the Developer or Contractor has not completed
the aforementioned work on the completion date as set forth above, or in the
event the Developer violates any of the agreements as set forth herein, the
Developer shall be considered to be in default. Should the Developer be in
default, the Developer authorizes said City, its officers, its employees, or
its authorized agents to enter upon the Developer's property and to complete
any uncompleted or improper work. The Developer's security shall be used for
all costs incurred by the City, including attorney's fees, that are connected
with this work.
The Developer shall notify the City Engineer of his intent to commence the
improvement work at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to doing so.
I
/too
Exhibit 1
The Meadows Second Addition
Phase I
Page 2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands the day and year
above mentioned.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Kenneth Maus, Mayor
Rick Woltsteller, City Administrator
(CITY)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
1989, `_y Kar..•.et.`. naus' mayor, and RicK Wo rsteiler, City
Administrator, of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
(DEVELOPER)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) as.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 1989, by Value Plus Homes.
Notary Public
c
D/O
Council Agenda - 5/22/89
>>• Consideration of request to prepare plans and specifications for restroom
in West Bridge Park. O .S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The restroom facilities at West Bridge Park located near Highway 25 are
old and in need of remodeling. The facilities do not provide access for
the handicapped and have deteriorated over the years due to wear and tear
and vandalism. There are no provisions in these units for year-round use
and they are drained with the onset of cold weather and reopened again in
late April.
During the winter, this park serves as a skating facility. The
concession building is heated and serves as a warming house. There are
no bathrooms for the individuals who skate here in the winter time. And
consequently, the City has received criticism in the past for this.
Since the bathrooms are in need of remodeling, the City staff would like
the Council to consider replacing the facilities with year-round, heated
bathrooms similar to those at the 4th Street park. The restroom building
would most likely be located closer to the concession area and could
either stand alone or be connected to the existing building. In
preparation for this, staff placed an amount of $20,000 in the 1989
budget, which was ratified by the City Council.
Prior to beginning any work on this project, City staff wishes to obtain
the census of the City Council as to whether the restrooms should stand
alone and the type of architecture the Council would wish to see or
whether they should be built at alll If the building is designed to
stand alone, it could be designed to look more like the hex shelter
already placed in the park, or to look more like the concession stand
building. At this time, City staff requests direction.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to authorize the staff to prepare some
renderings of particular types of buildings as determined by the City
Council. These drawings could then be brought back to the Council at
the next meeting for a decision as to type of building and
authorization to develop plane on said building.
2. The second alternative would be to select a type of building such as
a hexagon shaped building to match the existing hex shelter and
authorize City staff to prepare plans and specifications along with
cost estimates to be reviewed at an upcoming meeting.
3. The third alternative would be to not consider year-round restrooms
for West Bridge Park, but to remodel the existing seasonal bathrooms
and possibly look at renting satellite toilets for the winter months.
4. The fourth alternative would be to do nothing at this time but make
minimal improvements to the existing facilities as needed, and
continue to not provide handicap access or winter restrooms.
.9.
EI
Council Agenda - 5/22/89
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public works Director and Park
Superintendent that the City of Monticello authorize staff to proceed as
outlined in alternative pl or #2.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
-10-
Council Agenda - 5/22/89
_ (t2) Consideration of purchasing FAX machine. (K.D.)
0
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Staff has recently had the opportunity to test two FAX machines. We have
found that many of the firms with which we deal, including OSM, Howard
Dahlgren, and Springsted, now have FAX machines. Sending and receiving
information in this way could save the City time with current projects,
agendas, etc. The two models we tested were the Canon FAX 450 and the
Sharp FO -420. The quote from Cyberstar Corporation of Waite Park for the
Canon is $2,845; and the quote from Reliance Data Corporation of St. Paul
for the Sharp is $1,756, which includes delivery, installation, and
training. I had the opportunity to receive and send information through
both of these machines and preferred the Sharp FO -420. This model was
easier to use and I believe would suit the City's needs at this time.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACCIONS:
1. Approve the purchase of the Sharp FO -420 FAX machine for $1,756 from
Reliance Data Corporation of St. Paul.
2. Do not approve the purchase of a FAX machine at this time.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council approve the purchase of the Sharp P0-420
FAX machine from Reliance Data Corporation for $1,756. We believe that
transmitting information by FAX machine would benefit the City by saving
time on the progression of current projects, etc.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of quotes from Cyberstar Corporation and Reliance Data Corporation.
am
l
MMM
MOM RELIANCE DATA CORPORATION
®®® 1775 OLD HIGHWAY 8 e ST. PAUL, MN 55112 a (612) 631-1976
March 20, 1989
Jeff O'Neill
City of Monticello -
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Dear Jeff:
We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with the
following pricing on the Sharp FO -420 Facsimile, which
is comparable to the Canon Fax 225. Actually it's BETTER!
PROPOSAL
!retail Price $2195.00
Less Cash Discount 5439.00
Cost Per Unit $1756.00
LEASE AGREEMENT
12 Months 5205.00
24 Months 5112.00
36 Months $82.00
Buyout Option at End of Term 10%
Warranty: 90 Days; all parts and labor
On -Sight Maintenance agreement $250.00 Annually
Six Rolls of 164' paper/carton $42.00
The above prices also include delivery, installation, and
training. We look forward to working with you. It's a nice
drive to Monticellol
Si er ly,
RELIANCE DATA CORPORATION
1775 Ole Hlgt,.Gy 8
S1. Paul. 63 MN 55112
Rosemary Mehl (eu)e�
Sales Representative 1ro�e
Rosemary Mehl
Regional salsa nee,seenlau,s
Micro Computers, Faceimils and P0110e1eie
!
t 1
!
Proposal for the City of Monticello
City of
Thermal Paper Systems List Monticello
Cauon Fax 270 $2.495.00 $2.370.00
Includes: UHQ, up to 8 1/2" original. 12
second transmission. 20 page document feeder,
14 page memory, halftones (64 level), confi-
dential mailbox and more.
Canon Paz 450 $2.995.00 $2.845.00
Includes: UHQ, up to 11 3/4" original. 9
second transmission. 30 page document feeder,
20 page memory, halftones (64 level), TTI
selector (up to 10), confidential mailbox
and more.
( Plain Paper Systems
Canon Paz 350 $2.995.00 $2,845.00
Includes: up to 8 1/1" original, 15 second
transmission, 30 page document feeder, 7 page
memory, halftone (16 levels), book scanning
and more.
Canon Pat 830 $3,495.00 $3.320.00
Includes: UHQ, up to 11 3/4" original. 12
second transmission. 30 page document feeder,
20 page memory. halftone (64 level), TTI
selector (up to 10), confidential mailbox.
sheet decurler and more.
R
t
GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO.
CASH DISBURSEMENTS - MAY 1989
Government Training Center - Reg. Fee - Jeff O'Neill
100.00
26783
MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft, snowmobil S ATV Ref..
490.00
26784
Government Training Center - Reg. Fee - R. Wolfsteller
135.00
26785
011ie Koropchak - Mileage expense
18.50
26786
League of MN. Cities Insurance Trust - Insurance premium
53,537.00
26787
Void
-0-
26788
North Star Risk Services, Inc. - Bond renewal
361.00
26789
Gary Anderson - Mileage expense
98.43
26790
Jeff O'Neill - Travel and mileage expense
85.75
26791
U.S. Postmaster - Certified letters for recycling project
34.20
26792
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll Deductions
90.04
26793
Anoka County Social Services - Payroll Deductions
210.16
26794
I.C.M.A Retirement Trust - Payroll Deductions
503.58
26795
Void
-0-
26796
Cragun's Lodge 6 Conference Center - Room deposit - J. O'Neill
70.00
26797
Corrow Sanitation - Garbage contract payment
7,725.60
26798
PERA - Payroll Deductions
1,556.19
26799
Wright County State Bank - FICA, Medicare 6 Federal W/H
5,347.06
26800
Richard Knutson, Inc. - Payment on Water Main 6 Appurtenant Work
35,329.55
26801
MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft, snowmobile 6 ATV Reg.
590.00
26802
Adopt -A -Pct Inc. - Animal control expense
70.00
26803
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial Services at Library
227.50
26804
party Fr Izwcdcl coatro-t oa? ado-tr-_..a-
471.00
'-5E^5
Ervin 6 Donna Steltan - Acquisition of property
54,655.70
26806
Wright County Treasurer/Auditor - Closing Fees - Stelton Property
229.60
26807
Wright County Recorder - Closing Fees - Stelton Property
80.00
7.6808
Wright County State Bank - Acquisition of Stelcon Property
4,500.00
26809
Y.M.C.A. of Mpla. - Monthly contract payment
625.00
76810
Preusse Cleaning - Cleaning contract - City Hall 6 Fire Hall
450.00
26811
Wright County Treasurer/Auditor - Property Taxes
1,129.90
26812
Commissioner of Revenue - State Withholdings for April
1,731.42
26813
MN. Department of Labor 6 Industry - Certificate of Exemption Fce
60.00
26814
Copy Duplicating Products, Inc. - COpy machine maint. at Library
43.34
26815
M.N. U.C. Fund - Unemployment benefits
715.24
26816
Federal Licensing, Inc. - License - Civil Defense
85.00
26817
Holiday Gas - Gas - Fire Depart.
28.77
26818
Communication Auditors - Maine. of equip. - Fire Depart.
68.73
26819
U.S. Postmnseer - Certified letter for utility billing
16.00
26820
Back Door - Table for City Hall
98.00
26821
American National Lank 6 Trust Co. - Bond Fees
403.25
26822
MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft 6 ATV Reg.
838.00
26823
U.S. Postmaster - Postage
500.00
26824
U.S. Postmaster - Postage
12.00
26825
MN. Pollution Control Agency - Reg. fee for J. Simola
25.00
26826
Norwest Investment Services - Computer payment for May
2,407.61
26827
Midwest Gas Co. - Utilities
698.63
26828
Professional Services Group, Inc. - WWfP Contract 6 add'1 servicis
38,023.90
26829
Bridgewater Telephone Co. - Phone Charges
1,239.69
26830
N.S.P. - Utilities
6,955.60
26831
GAB Business Sorvicea, Inc. - Insuronce deductible - Ban James
250.00
26832
League of MN. Cities Insurance - Insurance premium
560.00
26833
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll Deductions
90.04
26834
GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO•
CASH DISBURSEMENTS - MAY 1989
Rick Wolfstaller - Mileage expense
300.00
26835
PERA - Insurance premium
18.00
26836
Crysteel = 90Z payment on new snow plow
11.925.90
26837
Corrow Sanitation - Reimbursements - weight slips - Garbage
58.50
26838
Corrow Sanitation - Add'1 land fill charges
2,747.40
26839
Wright County State Bank - FICA, Federal b Medicare W/H
5,236.10
26840
PERA - Payroll Deductions
1,507.41
26841
I.C.M.A Retirement Corp. - Payroll Deductions
503.50
26842
Automation Supply Co. - Computer ribbons
139.59
26843
Marco Products - Copy paper, repairs 6 Maintenance Agreement
2,946.45
26844
SMith b Hayes - Legal fees for March 6 April
4,063.28
26845
MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft b ATV Reg.
596.00
26846
Copy Duplicating Products, Inc. - Copy machine maint. at Library
41.99
26847
J.D.L. Cleaning Service - Cleaning Services at Library
313.00
26848
Richard Knutson, Inc. - Payment P2 - Water Main b Appurtenant Wo,k
123,161.71
26849
Barber Electric Supply, Inc. - Light Fixtures for Softball Field ¢
735.35
26850
Team Choice - Home Plate - Softball Fields
38.95
26851
Olson 5 SOns Electric - Parts and services
857.04
26852
Monticello Agency - Renewal of Notary Bond - R. Wolfsteller
70.00
26853
Taylor Land Surveyors - Elevations b Mylar Plat
376.00
26854
Maus Foods - Supplies
161.16
26855
West Publishing Co. - 1989 MN. Session Laws
100.00
26856
Pitney Bowes - Postage machine rental
7?.^ -5
2E.057
Marquette Bank Mpls. - 162,000 Parking Facility Bond of 1974
15,473.63
26858
Ken Maus - Travel Expense
98.20
26859
Wright County Treasurer/Auditor - Sheriff's contract payment
12,049.14
26860
Unocal - Gas
59.61
26861
Northern Oxygen Service - Supplies - Fire Depart.
12.30
26862
Monticello Fire Depart - Neil Kranz - Travel Expense
252.42
26863
Monticello Fire Depart - Steve Samuelson - Travel Expense
312.25
26864
Local #49 - Union Dues
115.00
26865
Suburban Gas Co. - Supplies
136.50
26866
Void
-0-
26867
National Bushing d Parts Co. -Parts
87.21
26868
Henning b Associates - Professional Services
204.90
26869
Sentry Systems - Flre Alarm Lease
126.00
26870
State Chemical Co. - Concrete Patching Material
153.78
26871
Snyder Drug - Supplies
18.36
26872
Simonson Lumber Co - Supplies
71.38
26873
Mortis's Farm Service - Fertilizer b Supplies
217.98
26874
Ruff Auto Parts, Inc. - Radio
15.90
26875
MacQuoen Equipment - Parte
43.63
26876
Moon Motors - Parts
101.89
26877
State Treasurer/Surplus Property Fund - Parts
42.00
26878
Safety-Kleon Corp. - Maint. of equipment
44.50
26879
Monticello Printing - Office supplies
58.60
26880
Mankato Technical Institute - Reg. Foe - Fire Depart.
160.00
26881
Royal Tire of Monticello - Repairs
620.05
26882
Nelson 011 Co. - Gas
58.35
26883
Loch Jewelers - Engraving - Fire Depart.
5.00
26884
Unitog Rental - Uniform Rental
115.20
26885
Davide Photography - Prints - Streatscape Project
40.00
26886
GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO.
CASH DISBURSEMENTS - MAY 1989
Monticello American Legion Post 0260 - New Flag - Fire Depart.
30.00
26887
League of MN. Cities - Subscription for Ken Maus
20.00
26888
Monticello-BIg Lake Pet Hospital - Animal Control Services
354.25
26889
North Star Turf, Inc. - Fertilltzer - Park Depart.
1,299.20
26890
The J.P. Cooke Co. - Dog Licenses
74.31
26891
Rheaume's Incorp. - Decals, etc.
1,111.85
26892
Direct Safety Co. - Parts for Water Depart.
98.38
26893
Gould Bros. Chev. - Repairs
82.65
26894
Adam's Pest Control, Inc. - Pest Control Services at City Hall
47.50
26895
Foster Franzen Carlson Agency - Insurance bond renewal
50.00
26896
Motorola, Inc. - 2 pagers S chargers for Fire Depart.
868.00
26897
Coast to Coast - Suppiies
348.36
26898
Harry's Auto Supply - Supplies
338.75
26899
Ben Franklin Store - Supplies
29.97
26900
Purcell Plumbery - Water Fountain - Parks
118.00
26901
Gerald Munn -Sludge Disposal
500.00
26902
Monticello Fire Depart. - Firemen's Wages
2.025.41
26903
Patty Salzwedel - Animal Control contract S Adoptions
445.00
26904
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial Services - Library
227.50
26905
Principal Mutual Life Ins. Co. - Insurance Premium
6,305.83
26906
Turnquist Paper Co. - Supplies - City Hall
248.80
26907
U.S. Postmaster - Postage - Sewer 6 Water bills d Recycling Info,
513.43
26908
Monticello Times - Legal Publications
1.703.96
26909
REM Supplies - Gloves - Street Depart.
55.83
26910
Chaplin Publishing Co. - Ad for bids - Street Project
120.60
26911
Mobil - Gas
172.00
26912
Royal Tire of Monticello - Repairs for Fire Depart.
602.52
26913
Data Management Design. Inc. - Supplies for computer
208.99
26914
Earth Care Paper Co. - Recycled paper
110.88
26915
Century Labs - Cleaners - Parks Depart.
299.64
26916
Monticello TW Hardware - Supplies - Sewer Collection Depart.
3.48
26917
P 6 H Warehouse Sales, Inc. - Supplies - Parke Depart.
139.71
26918
Marlene Hellman - Mileage expense
32.25
26919
Mnrkhurd Corp. - Enlarged print - Plan b Zon. Depart.
160.73
26920
Monticello Housing 6 R.V. Center - Repairs - Fire Depart.
363.60
26921
Monticello Office Products - Office supplies
424.66
26922
Gullings Exc. - Haul street sweeper
300.00
26923
Monticello Ford, Inc. - Repairs
124.81
26924
Jim Hatch Sales Co. - Tools, etc. - Street Depart.
470.72
26925
Auto Truck Service Co. - Painting sweeper
1,208.00
26926
Fast Photo Image - Disc films - Bld. Insp. Depart.
10.50
26927
Karen Doty - Mileage
50.25
26928
Share Corp. - Weed Killer 8 Fertilizer - Parka Deport.
1,077.37
26929
A T 6 T Info. Systems - Fire Phone charges
3.96
26930
Wright County Highway Depart. - Snnd/salt mix
439.12
26931
Superior Products - Sink, faucet, etc. - Concession Bld.
285.50
26932
MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft 6 ATV. Reg.
897.00
26933
Corrow Sanitation - Leaf pickup service
600.00
26934
Feedrite Controls - Supplies - Water Depart.
2,844.32
26935
Mobil - Gas
97.71
26936
011ie Koropchak - Mileage expenso
55.50
26937
Dayle Vechas Const. - Completion of Concession stand
950.00
26938
Marco Business Products - Paper, ribbons 6 Maintenance Agreement
440.88
26939
Payroll for April
30,323.99
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR MAY
$469.955.01
LIQUOR FUND
CASH DISBURSEMENTS - MAY 1989
AMOUNT
CI'_ECK
NO.
Quality Wine 6 Spirits Co. - Liquor
$1,693.08
14413
Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor
1,902.05
14414
Ed Phillips 6 Sons Co. - Liquor
884.08
14415
Johnson Bros. Wholesale Liquor Co. - Liquor
1,749.13
14416
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll Deductions
250.00
14417
Travelers Directory Service - Advertising
161.00
14418
PERA - Payroll Deductions
200.97
14419
Wright County State Bank - FICA, Federal 6 Medicare W/H
623.29
14420
Commissioner of Revenue - State Withholdings for April
219.46
14421
Quality Wine 6 Spirits Co. - Wine
506.81
14422
T.V. Fan Fare - Advertising
156.00
14423
NCR Coporation - Supplies
59.13
14424
Zee Medical Service - Supplies
33.10
14425
Coast to Coast - Supplies
14.16
14426
Ron's Ice Company - Ice
111,96
14427
Monticello Office Products - Office supplies
3.18
14428
Dahlheimer Distributing Co. - Beer
15,226.00
14429
Grosslein Beverage Co. - Beer
10,652.30
14430
Thorpe Distributing Co. - Beer
12,946.35
14431
Day Distributing Co. - Beer and supplies
469.70
14432
Dick Beverage Co. - Beer
2,048.15
14433
Jude Candy 6 Tobacco Co.. Inc. - Supplies
537.48
14434
Seven-up Bottling Co.. Inc. - Pop
127.45
14435
Bernick's Pepsi Cola Co. - Pop
241.35
14436
1 V.S.P. - Utilities
539.26
14437
Midwest Gas Co. - Utilities
68.12
14438
KRWC Radio - Advertising
72.00
14439
Monticello Times - Advertising
48.00
14440
Kolles Sanitation - Carbnge Service
141.00
14441
Liefort Trucking - Freight Charges
399.92
14442
Viking Coca-Cola Co. - Pop
288.85
14443
Quality Wine 6 Spirits Co. - Liquor
1,479.53
14444
Bel.boy Corporation - Liquor
2,551.78
14445
Commissioner of Revenue - Sales Tax due for April
7,219.12
14446
Bridgewater Telephone Co. - Phone Charges
81.86
14447
Griggs, Cooper 6 CO. - Liquor
4,009.24
14448
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll Deductions
250.00
14449
Johnson Brothers Wholesale Liquor Co. - Liquor
1.864.28
14450
PERA - Insurance premium
9.00
14451
PERA - Payroll Deductions
194.15
14452
Wright County State Bank - FICA, Federal 6 Medicare W/H
594.17
14453
Quality Wine 6 Spirits - Wine
722.96
14454
Purcell Plumbary - Supplies
7.99
14455
Principal Mutual Life Insurance - Insurance premium
728.18
14456
St. Cloud Restaurant - Garbage liners
32.18
14457
Eagle Wine Co. - Wine
221.42
14458
Griggs. Cooper 6 Co - Liquor
5,861.63
14459
Ed Phillips 6 Sons Co. - Liquor
2,636.34
14460
JOhnson Brothers Wholesale Liquor Co. - Liquor
1,712.36
14461
'entury Labs - Cleaner
55.45
14462
amity of Monticello - Sower and nater bill
26.98
14463
Payroll for April 3.868.33
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR MAY 86,500.28