City Council Agenda Packet 09-26-1988Council Agenda - 9/26/88
Public Hearing on Improvements to Floyd Markling Townhouse Development
and Monticello Country Cluo - 88-03 Project At7D
Consideration of Resolution Approving plans and Specifications and
Advertising for Bids on 88-03 Project. (R.il.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the previous Council meeting, Mr. Floyd Markling had presented a
petition requesting sewer and water extensions to his proposed 8 -unit
townhouse development to be located on the former Betty Grossnickle
property. John Badalich at O&M had prepared a feasibility study for
servicing this property and had estimated the total cost at $62,200
including indirect costs. The feasibility study presented showed a sewer
and water extension that could terminate at the Country Club property and
also provide service for the Country Club. Although they were not part
of the petition, a public hearing was scheduled for this meeting to allow
input from the Country Club on a cost sharing arrangement for this
project.
Although it appears from my conversations with Country Club
representatives that they are not interested in the sewer and water
improvements at this time, the Council certainly has the authority to
order the improvement and provide services if it is feasible. On the
other hand, it is also feasible to terminate the sewer and water
extension in the Markling property without extending services to the
Country Club property at this time. Unless a utility easement was
obtained from Mr. Markling for a future extension to the Country Club
property line, the Country Club would be faced with a very long extension
to connect to County Road 39 if they needed sewer or water in the
` future. It would seem more beneficial for the Country Club to be part of
this project at this time rather than waiting and having to extend their
r~r` own service connection all the way down to County Road 39 (Golf Course
Road) .
For the public hearing, I have asked City Engineer, John Badalich, to
provide a cost estimate for servicing only Mr. Markling's townhouse
L -+amu development if it was decided not to extend the services to the Country
SClub. In addition, Mr. Badalich will be providing information on whether
the extension would have to be oversized to provide a connection
1 capability to the Country Club. The feasibility study presented at the
last meeting indicated an 8 -inch sewer line along with an 8 -inch and a
6 -inch water main. If it was determined to terminate the project within
the townhouse development, possibly this sizing could be smaller.
Assuming the Council would require the sewer and water mains to be
extended through an easement to the Country Club property line, I am sure
the Country Club is very interested in knowing the dollar cost of their
proposed assessment. As a result, I have asked the engineer to present
his recommendation on how the project should be assessed, i.e., what
percentage or number of units should be chargeable to the Country Club
and Mr. Markling's development. I figured our engineer could better
Council Agenda - 9/26/88
determine the appropriate assessment ratio rather than the staff
arbitrarily picking out a figure or assigning a dollar cost to each.
After all testimony has been received, the public hearing can be closed
and a motion to this effect should be enacted.
Based on the public hearing comments, the Council then has a number of
options for proceeding with this improvement.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to approve the plans and
specifications for extending sewer and water to both the Markling
development and the Country Club property and to advertise for bids
�,- immediately.
X14
2. The second alternative would be to approve plans and specifications
for only serving the townhouse development and to also advertise for
bids.
3. If the improvement was ordered only for the townhouse development, !;•'
the option still exists allowing Mr. Markling to do the project
;.;✓��
privately at his own expense.
L'
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
"
J
With the sewer and water petition only being submitted by Mr. Markling at
this time, the staff is somewhat uncomfortable with recommending the City
order the improvement against the Country Club property against their
wishes. From a practical standpoint, this will probably be the cheapest
method of ever serving the Country Club property, and it may be prudent
for the City Council to order the sewer and water extension for the
Country Club even if they are opposed to the assessment. With the
Country Club expanding the number of holes to 18 and possibly expanding
their club house in the future, it certainly seems appropriate that they
eventually hook up to city sanitary sewer rather than using their drain
field method. The Council has the authority to defer the assessment for
the Country Club until they hook on to the sewer system, which would have
to be within three years after it was available. In this case, there may
be some justification for a short deferment in that the Country Club did
not originally petition for the sewer and water extensions but are
involved with the project because of another development.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution. Additional information from the City engineer will
be included if obtained prior to delivery or will be presented at the
Council meeting.
-2-
J
Orr
staveron&
Assoaares, inc
' 202t Eas Henneprn Avenue
mmneapohs, !nu 55.13
September 22, 1988
cit J363rn0
FAX 331-380b
Engmr
5.,cyom
Mr. Jeff O'Neill Planners
Assistant Administrator
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
PO Box 83A
Monticello, MN 55362
RE: Floyd Markling Property
Dear Jeff:
As a follow-up to our telephone conversation regarding the assessable cost of
providing sewer and water services to the Floyd Markling property on West County
Road 39 in Monticello, the following are several scenarios that can be used in
arriving at a reasonable assessment.
The estimated project cost including indirect costs for furnishing these
utilities to the property is $62,160. This project would benefit the eight
parcels proposed on the Markling property and also the Monticello Country Club.
We anticipate extending the sewer and watermain through the cul-de-sac to the
common property line of the Markling property and the Country Club property.
I Method One
This method would be an equal sharing of the assessable cost based solely on a
per parcel basis. That is, eight parcels in the Markling property and one
parcel for the Country Club. Therefore, $62,160 divided by nine equals $6,907
per parcel. Markling's total cost would be $52,253 and the Country Club,
56,901. An easement would be necessary for the utility extention from the cul-
�sac to the north property line of Markling's property.
Method Two
Using the analogy that townhouses are similar to multiple dwellings whereby a
multiple dwelling unit receives a 3J4 parcel assessment. Therefore, 3J4 times
eight units equals six units for Markling, Country Club, one unit, for a total
of seven units. Markling's assessable cost is then $62,160 divided by seven,
times six equals 553,280 or $6.660 per parcel, and the Country Club assessment
is S8,880.
Method Threee
What is the additional cost of the total project cost to extend sewer and water
from the cul-de-sac to the north property line? This extension only benefits
the Country Club and the balance of the project benefits both parties.
Estimated cost of this extention is $4,300, including indirect costs. The
assessable cost then is, using the equal parcel basis, $62,160 minus $4,300
equals $57,860 divided by nine equals $6,429 per parcel for the eight townhouses
and $6,429 plus S4,300 equals $10,729 for the Country Club. Next, using the 314
cost per parcel rationale for multiple dwellings would then be equated to
149,595 for Markling's property, or $6,200 per parcel and $8,265 plus $4,300
equals $12,565 assessable cost to the Country Club.
9
Method Four
This scenario would be based on water consumption of a residence compared to a
country club usage of its members for sanitary purposes, showers, bar and food
service. A residential unit is usually calculated at 75 gallons per capita per
day, or approximately 225 gallons per household per day. According to the MPCA,
a country club is calculated at 22 gallons per member with no meals, but you
would add 10 to 20 gallons per day per member if showers are available. For
this calculation, we will use 35 gallons per member per day. Average membership
of country clubs is 300 members. We can say that during the course of a day,
there are six tee times per hour for a foursome times 10 hours per day equals
240 members. Using 240 members times 35 gallons per member per day equals 8,400
gallons per day. Equating this to residential units, this will equal 8,400
divided by 225 equals 37 residential units. Therefore, 37 units for the Country
Club plus 8 units for Markling, equals a total of 45 units. Taking the $62,160,
dividing by 45 units equals $1,381 per unit. Markling's assessable cost would
then be eight times $1,381 or $14,648. The balance of $47,512 being the Country
Club assessable cost. This method of calculation, I believe, is unreasonable.
Therefore, in summary, you see we can arrive at a wide and variable range of
assessable costs, from $1,380 per unit to $6,907 per unit for Markling. For the
Country Club, the assessable amount could vary from $6,907 to $6,880 to $10,729
to $12,565 to $47,512 at the maximum.
Based on assessment figures we have developed over the years for Monticello, an
8" lateral sewer assessment averages out to $28.50 per foot. A lateral
residential watermaln assessment is $24.75 a foot. Monticello's minimum lot
width 1s 80'. Therefore, using the figures noted above, the assessable cost
would be 80 times (28.50 + $24.75) equals $53.25 times 80 equals $4,260. For a
100' parcel. this would amount to $5,325 per parcel. Using $4,260 times 8
parcels, this would give an assessable cost to Markling of $34,080 and to the
Country Club $28,080. Using $5,325 times 8 parcels equals $42,600 for Markling
and $19,560 for the Country Club. ,The average of the two is $38.340 for
Markling or $4,193 for each of the 8 parcels. The Country Club share would be
$23,820.
Jeff, take your pick. I favor the latter split, $23,820 for the Country Club
and $38,340 for Markling.
If you have any questions in this regard, please give me a call.
Very truly yours,
ORR-SCHELEN-:,AYERON
ASSOCIATES. INC.
hnP. Badalich, P.E.
ice President
JPB/lmt
C G ud
�cPe-.ter y
NOTE:
1 2 7 4 RJRNISN 0, INSTALL I" WATER ANP
I-SANITORY SEWER SERVICES. ,
c;
��T'."PLUO ENO E BLOCK f"OJP.
L--zo'PeRw.esAlT. (�� S��a
Im
) U R S E ROAD NOTE THIS CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT, REMOVE B REPLACE
BITUMINOUS MAT AS SNOWN IN COMPLETE ACCORDANCE
H. NO. 39) WIT" WRIG"T COUNTY PERMIT,
I1. 24'TRAVELEO
ROADWAY ONLY
':'l•' TACIT COAT
2341 WEAR I—IFI 1
• All ED
�S E E RIGHTI G I 3'2331 BASE
?3 1 6' CLASS 0 AGGREGATE BASE
I
NOTE: VERln WITH ENGINEER rub , I '! 2' 2361 WEAR OUTSIDE OF 24'
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TRAVELED ROADWAY WITH
NOTE: PROTECT IN PLACE BIT• FOR THE EXACT LOCATION w II 6" OF CLA33 S
ROADWAY EXCEPT WHERE OF SERVICES.
SHOWN FOR ?EMOMv_a L. € 1 I 2
LPAO E p Alvl
iNY M �, I REMOvE 6 REPLACE
3' SIGNS 11, TAIL ' l A0• ` 100'
DONrace
�DESTaI I M.H. 1-2 22•V2'6E.V0 �1 / �w , 1-I 6+25 40'LT.
-i30••• .., 'I� Y�� lX. �&If. r4vlrlrT
6/ T u v C. �.—= i OAA -Avg
/r _ 0 ~
r' 1 I I .1 P
�PwluG END 6 ILOCX ►T AIC. r• -•q r-,4ur R ,r s3N
6 16 TEE a rru/ 03 e�2� I..n _—NOTE:
' I REMOVE A S!:-
-w
E-am p I _ CONNER T. D
6ENO. RL: 6
7 TO WEST. L.
I� I LUMP Sum E1:
pUTL,OT A NOTE . CONSTRUCTION OF A TEMP ACCESS d
ROAD BETWEEN C.$.A,H 39 AND
FRONTAGE ROAD LS NECESSARf,JE
• CLASS 7 ANO RESTORATION wpy
6E PAID AT UNIT PRICES. C AO•
/ V
CLUB MANOR
• 6PEAa INTO EA ..AT ILEVATICN
SwOwN 6 GROUT AT NO ADDITIONAL
CQMrIN"TIQN /_1,
NOTE . TRAFFIC CONTROL. SIGNAGE, AND TEMP_ BY --ASS CU
RESOLUTION 88 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFT_CATICNS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on September 12, 1988,
the City Engineer, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, has prepared plans and
specifications for the improvement of sanitary sewer and watermain extensions
from Golf Course Road to serve property owner, Floyd Markling, and Monticello
Country Club has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for
approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MCNTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file at City
Hall, are hereby approved.
2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
Monticello Times and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement
for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved
plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for
10 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids
will be received by the Administrator until a.m.
on , 1988, at which time they wsii be
publicly opened in the Councu Chambers of the City Hall by the City
Administrator and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be
considered by the Council at 7:30 p.m, on
1988, in the Council Chambers. No bids will be consicereo unless
sealed and filed with the Administrator and accompanied by a cash
deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the
City of Monticello for 59 of the amount of such bid.
Adopted this 26th day of September, 1988.
Mayor
City Administrator
5.
Council Agenda - 9/26/88
Public Hearing for Moving and Relocation Expenses Pertaining to
Acquisition of Property. (O.K.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
This public hearing for moving and relocation expenses is in pursuant of
the HUD -Uniform Act, person(s) or business(es) who undergo displacement
due to acquisition of property by a government entity are entitled to
compensation of moving and relocation expenses. Purpose of the public
hearing is to give parties the opportunity to present written or oral
testimony, comments, objections, suggestions, and other matters. Public
hearing notice was published in the local newspaper. The fixed agreeable
moving and relocation expenses are inclusive of the acquisition costs of
the Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor (Sellers) properties to the Monticello
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (Buyer).
Purchase Agreements have been executed between all three property owners
and the HRA with closing date on or before March 1, 1989, earnest monies
of $10,000 was released to each property owner. Earnest monies was a
debit to the BRA General Account. The total acquisition costs are
recovered and explained in Modification Plan '#3 for Tax Increment
District t2 (next agenda item). Below is the cost breakdown for the
acquisition, moving and relocation expenses, and demolition cost incurred
by the BRA.
JONES
PROPERTY (EARNEST MONEY)
$10,000.00
CLOSING (LAND)
42,000.00
(MOVING 6 RELOC.)
5,000.00
$57,000.00
DEMOLITION
5,000.00
'DOTAL
$62,000.00
O'CONNOR
PROPERTY (EARNEST MONEY)
$10,000.00
CLOSING (RAW LAND)
40,000.00
(MOVING 6 RELOC.)
5,000.00
TOTAL
$55,000.00
STELTON'S
PROPERTY (EARNEST MONEY)
$10,000.00
CLOSING (LAND)
50,000.00
(MOVING 6 RELOC.)
5,000.00
$65,000.00
DEMOLITION
5,000.00
TOTAL
$70,000.00
TO': AL
-3-
$187,000.00
Council Agenda - 9/26/88
After closing date and demolition of said properties by the HRA, and
after closing date between Broadway Square Limited partnership and
Farmers Home Administration, then Broadway Square Limited Partnership
will acquire said properties plus the Old Ford Garage property from the
HRA for construction of a 28 -unit subsidized elderly project. Broadway
Square Limited Partnership has received written confirmation to proceed
with FmHA Program Form 622 (final formal application) for funding in
spring of 1989.
With the assumption the public hearing is held and closed without public
confrontation, the City Council may proceed to consider approval of a
resolution for the acquisition of the Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor
properties with acquisition cost to include moving and relocation
expenses of $5,000 per property owner which is a fixed payment and
agreeable between Jones, Stelton, O'Connor, and the BRA.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve a resolution for the acquisition of the Jones, Stelton, and
O'Connor properties with acquisition cost to include moving and
relocation expenses of $5,000 per property owner (Seller) which is a
fixed payment and agreeable between the sellers and the buyer.
2. Deny approval of a resolution for the acquisition of the Jones,
Stelton, and O'Connor properties by the HRA.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends alternative 41.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the resolution.
-4-
RESOLUTION 88-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING T9E
MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ACQUISITION COST INCLUSIVE OF MOVING AND RELOCATION
EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE HUD -UNIFORM ACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, has determined
the need to approve the acquisition cost of the Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor
properties (the "Sellers") to the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (the "Buyer") inclusive of moving and relocation expenses pursuant to
the HUD -Uniform Act, person(s) or business(es) who undergo displacement due to
acquisition of property by a government entity are entitled to compensation of
moving and relocation expenses; and
WHEREAS, the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Buyer") has
entered into a purchase agreement with Alvin and Shirley Jones (the "Seller"),
with Ervin and Donna Stelton (the "Seller"), and Joseph and Clarice O'Connor
(the "Seller"); and
WHEREAS, both the buyer and the sellers are agreeable to the terms of the
purchase agreement inclusive of $5,000 each as fixed payment for moving and
relocation expenses; and
WHEREAS, there was presented to this meeting of the City Council of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, a copy of the total acquisition budget; and
WHEREAS, the buyer agrees to pay $57,000 for the property located at 110 North
Locust Street, Monticello, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the buyer agrees to pay $65,000 for the property located at 237 West
Broadway, Monticello, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the buyer agrees to pay $55,000 for the property located at 247 West
Broadway, Monticello, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Modification 13 for the Tax Increment Finance plan Redevelopment
District 92 inclusive of the debt service retirement for the said above
properties; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 26, 1988, at 7:30 o'clock p.m.
before the City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, in
Monticello, Minnesota, notice of which has been published once in the official
newspaper for the City, not less than ten, nor more than thirty days prior to
September 26, 1988; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing all persons and parties were given full
opportunity to present written and oral testimony, comments, objections,
suggestions, and other matters, all of which were duly considered by the
Council;
Resolution 88 -
Page 2 1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVM BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MON'rICELLO
that the City of Monticello does hereby approve the acquisition cost of the
Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor properties (the "Sellers") to the Monticello
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Buyer") inclusive of moving and
relocation expenses and finds:
1. That the proposed acquisition will contribute to the elimination of
blight or deterioration within the area.
2. That the proposed acquisition will eliminate the potential hazards of
health, safety, and general well-being of the community.
3. That the proposed acquisition will create a use for a portion of
underused land.
4. That the proposed acquisition, demolition, and redevelopment will
create needed subsidized elderly housing.
The City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, does hereby approve the
Monticello sousing and Redevelopment Authority acquisition cost inclusive of
moving and relocation expenses.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of September, 1988.
Mayor
City Adminlst:ator
8
Council Agenda - 9/26/88
Public Hearing for Modification 43 of Project Costs for Tax Increment
District 42. (O.K.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
This the public hearing for Modification 43 of project costs for Tax
Increment District 42 for the purpose to give all parties the opportunity
to present written or oral testimony, comments, objectives, suggestions,
and other matters. Date for the public hearing was set by the City
Council on September 12, 1988, thereafter, in pursuant of the Minnesota
Statute, Section 273.74, Subdivision 3 and 4, a public hearingnotice
appeared in the local newspaper at least once not less than ten days nor
more than 30 days prior to the date of the hearing. Once the public
hearing has been opened and closed, the City Council may proceed to
consider the adoption of a resolution for Modification 43 for Tax
Increment District 42.
Modification 43 consists of the acquisition and demolition of the Jones,
Stelton, and O'Connor properties by the Monticello Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA). Thereafter, the above listed raw land
plus the Old Ford Garage property will be purchased by the Broadway
Square Limited Partnership for construction of a 28 -unit subsidized
elderly housing facility.
The project costs associated with the acquisition and demolition of the
three properties were outlined in the prior agenda item. The
modification plan includes a bond issuance at $260,000 which will recover
cost of the Old Ford Garage project ($91,196), recover cost of the Jones,
Stelton, and O'Connor project ($187,000), and recover cost of the bond
issuance, capitalized interest, and administrative ($84,804), for a total
district project cost of $363,000. The district project cost ($363,000),
less $58,000 from Farmers Rome Administration, less $260,000 bond
issuance has a remaining balance of $45,000. The HRA proposed 1/2 mill
levy will cover the $45,000 balance.
The estimated tax increment ($36,084) to be generated and payable in 1991
is sufficient to cover the annual debt service ($30,193) for the 5260,000
(,4i� bond issuance over 18 years at 9.258 interest plus the annual debt
service ($4,285) for the Metcalf and Larson securities through 1997.
�V y_
r,r The HRA does not deny the high cost associated with the project; however,
they believe the long term benefits to the City are justifiable:
C/ 1) Eliminates blight in a distressed downtown area; 2) Eliminates the
potential hazards of health, safety, and general well-being of the
community; 3) Creates a use for a portion of underused land (approximate
10 years without a retail/commercial development interest); 4) Creates
needed subsidized elderly housing; 5) Creates pedestrian traffic for
existing businesses; and 6) Enhances the Downtown Rehabilitation Project.
With the assumption the public hearing was closed without opposition, the
City Council may consider the following alternative actions.
1
�. -g-
Council Agenda — 9/26/88
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Adopt the resolution for Modification #3 of Project Costs for Tax
Increment District t2.
2. Deny adoption of the resolution for Modification 63 of the project
cost for Tax Increment District 12.
C. STAFF REMtOENDATION:
City staff supports the HRA's rationale of the project costs, therefore,
recommends the City Council to adopt the resolution for Modification i3
of project costs for Tax Increment District !2.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of Resolution.
Pi
-6-
RESOLUTION 88-
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING MODIFICATION $3 OF THE
EXISTING TAX INCRE`!E`1T FINANCE PL41 FOR
REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 02 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 273.71 TO 273.78 INCLUSIVE OF THE MINNESOTA STATUTE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, has determined
the need to modify the finance plan of an existing tax Increment finance
redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Section 273.74,
Subdivision 4, within the redevelopment pro3ec: created pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 462.411 et seq.: and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, found in 1983
that it was necessary to create a tax increment finance redevelopment district
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.71 to 273.78 inclusive; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed modification of the
tax increment finance plan; and
WHEREAS, the members of the School Board of Education of the Local Independent
School District #882 and the Board of Commissioners of the County of Wright
have been informed of the fiscal and economic implications of the proposed
modification of the existing Tax Increment Finance Plan for Redevelopment
District $21 and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 26, 1988, at 7:30 o'clock p.m.
before the City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, in
Monticello, Minnesota, notice of which has been published twice in the official
newspaper for the City, not less than ten, nor more than thirty days prior to
September 26, 19881 and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing all persona and parties were given full
opportunity to present written or oral testimony, comments, objections,
suggestions, and other matters, all of which were duly considered by the
Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO
that the City of Monticello does hereby modify the existing tax increment
finance plan and finds:
1. That the proposed acquisition of commercial property lies as modified
within the finance plan of the Tax Increment Redevelopment District
92 and that the intended demolition will contribute to the
elimination of blight or deterioration within the area.
2. That the Tax Increment Finance Plan an modified will increase the
amount of bonded indebtedness.
3. That the Tax Increment Finance Plan as modified will increase the
portion of the captured assessed value to be retained by the
Authority.
C
Resolution 88 -
Page 2
4. That the Tax Increment Finance Plan as modified will increase in
total the estimated tax increment expenditures.
S. That the Planning Commission has reviewed the tax increment finance
plan as modified herein and it conforms to the general plan for
development of the municipality as a whole because its final result
will increase the City's commercial or housing activity.
6. That the tax increment finance plan as modified herein will afford
maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a
whole, for the development by private enterprise as it will enable
the City to assist a future developer by providing a suitable site
for development.
The City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, does hereby approve
Modification i3 to the Tax Increment Finance Plan for Redevelopment District
$2.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of September, 1988.
Mayor
City Aominiatrator
IN
j
EN
Council Agenda - 9/26/88
8. Consideration of a Resolution Issuing an Order for Abatement of Dangerous
Buildings - Cli ford Olson Property. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the July 25 Council meeting, a petition was presented from neighboring
property owners of the Clifford Olson rental property at 100 East 4th
Street requesting Council action to initiate procedures to abate a
dangerous building. The current structure is not rented at the present
time, and Building Inspector, Gary Anderson, has noted that the building
is not fit for habitation and would require major improvements for
restoration. The City Council authorized the City Attorney to proceed
with the necessary steps to have the property owner either correct the
deficiencies or demolish the structure.
City Attorney, Tom Bayes, has been in contact with Mr. Clifford Olson to
notify him of the building code violations and the threat of safety posed
by the structure. Mr. Olson has corresponded with the City Attorney; but
at the present time, improvements have not commenced. As a result, in
order to follow the procedures according to Minnesota State Statutes,
Mr. Hayes has prepared an order listing the violations of the building
code, etc., that Mr. Olson will have 45 days to complete. Should the
property owner decide not to comply with this order, it is the intent of
the City Attorney to file a motion before the District Court for summary
enforcement.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Adopt the resolution proceeding with the order for improvements
according to Minnesota Statutes 463.15 to 463.261.
2. Do not adopt the resolution issuing the order. This will essentially
stop any action on the City's part to correct the deteriorating
building.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
In order to proceed with efforts to require the property owner to repair
or demolish a dangerous building, it is recommended by the staff that the
resolution be adopted and the order issued by the City Council as
presented. This recommendation follows the guidelines established by
State Statutes and recommended by City Attorney, Tom Hayes.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the order prepared by Tom Hayes; Copy of resolution; Copy of
applicable Statutes pertaining to abatement of dangerous buildings.
-7-
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
City of Monticello.
Petitioner,
and
Clifford Lee Olson and
Garnet Elizabeth Olson.
Respondent.
DISTRICT COURT
TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CIVIL DIVISION
CASE TYPE: IO
ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL UNDER
MINN. STAT. SECTIONS 463.15-463.261
TO: Clifford Lee Olson and Garnet Elizabeth Olson
Upon resolution of the City Council, City of Monticello, and pursuant to
authority granted under Minn. Stat. Sections 463.15-463.261, you are each
jointly and severally ordered to make the following repairs to the structures
located on Lot Ten (10), Black Sixteen (16). Townsite of Monticello. County of
Wright, State of Minnesota:
1. Vent the gas water heater. .
2. Replace ceiling and wall coverings near and around the Stairwell
leading to the Second level.
3. Repair the kitchen sink waste pipe.
4. Repair or replace exposed wiring to any non -covered, no ground
fault electrical wall outlet box.
5. ,Repair or replace exposed wiring from wall outlet to ceiling
receptacle.
6. Cover ceiling hole in kitchen coiling above cooking Stove.
7. Caulk around bathroom tub and repair or replace water damaged
flooring.
B. Install permanent lavatory fixture support.
9. Replace or repair non -vented. expoaed wire exhaust fan.
10. Shore -up or replace Sagging beams and timbera.
11. Reinforce buckling walls.
12. Eliminate vermin nesting in and about the property.
13. Correct any and all other electrical, plumbing or Building Code
violations.
14. Secure exterior roof and siding against further weather -caused
deterioration.
15. Secure structures from unauthorized entries.
This order is authorized under Minn. Stat. Sections 463.15-463.261
because the structures located on the above-described real estate are
hazardous buildings within the meaning of Minn. Stat. Section 463.15, aubd. 3.
The structures have reached such a state of disrepair as to become
uninhabitable, unsanitary, a fire hazard and a hazard to public health and
safety. The structures also constitute dangerous buildings under the Uniform
Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings as adopted by the City of
Monticello (Chapter 5. Section 4-5-1, Ordinances of the City of Monticello).
Compliance with this Order must be accomplished within 45 days of the
date you are served with the Order. In the alternative, you may comply with
this Order by presenting to the City Administrator at 250 West Broadway,
Monticello. Minnesota, within 30 days of the date you are served with this
Order, written and fully executed contracts for the repairs required herewith
provided that any contractor you contact with must be bonded and licensed and
any contract Oust be performable in full within 4$ days of the contract data.
If you do not comply with this Order within the time specified. or you
do not file an Answer within the time specified in Minn. Stat. Section 463.18,
the City of Monticello will bring a motion before the District Court, Tenth
Judicial District, Wright County, Minnesota, for summary enforcement of this
2
9
L,
Judicial District, Wright County, Minnesota, for summary enforcement of this
Order.
DATED:
ATTESTED TO:
City Administrator
CITY OF MONTICELLO
by its Council:
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Mayor
R-41
§ $63.16 BUILDING LINE EASEMENTS. ETC
063.16. Repair or remo•at of hazardous building
The governing body of any city or town may order the owner of any hazardous building
within the municipality to correct the hazardous condit:on of such building or to raze or
remove the same.
taws 1965. G 393, 12. Amended by taws 1773, a 123, arc S. 17.
3973 Amendment. Laws 1973. c. 123, art 5, ing's destruction when, by reason of economic
4 was a general authantauon for the consoli- impossibility, landlurd did not undertake repairs
dation of the terms "vdiagei' and "bomugha•' consututed destruction of buildins by nuh1K au,
MW Ne term -aues" or the subsutuuon of the Nonry wmcn, pursuant to lease. terminated
tens "statutory cues" for "villages" gad/or Is—. Bur v. Eckes. A 984, 354 Y.W.2d
"bomugiu." 8i pp•1
534.
^'
Yet" of Deciaiona
'-i..•..
L In genteel
Cry's actions in ordering leased building e6
Wer
need or mpat ed and proceeding with budd•
�My
661.161. Abatement
In the manner prescribed in Minnesota Statutes, Section 463.21 the governing body of
,tl
any city or town may correct the hazardous condition of any hazardous building or parcel
of real estate: the cost of which shall be charged agatnct the real estate as provided in
section 463.21 except the governing body may provide that the cost so assessed may be
paid in not to exceed rive equal annual installments with interest therein, at eight percent
per annum.
laws Me, G 341. g Z
2916 Amendment. Changed the dtle of regia CSS. Muninpal Corporations 4 31,
trar of deeds to county recorder.
Library References
Slunrupsl Corporations 0.629.
663.17. The order
Subdivision 1. Content*. The order shall be in wasting: recite the grounds therefor,
.�.t�
shall ify the necessary repairs, if any, and provide a reasonable time for compliance: and
sstate that a motion for summary be
R
!ty `
enforcement of the order will made to the
district court of the cour.ty in which the hazardous building is situated unless corrective
,•*�
action is taken, or unless an answer is filed within the time specified in section 461.18.
t •
Solid. :. Service. The order shall be served upon the owner of record, or the owner's
agent if an agent is in charge of the building, and upon the occupying tenant, if there is
_•
one, and upon ad :ien holders of record, in the manner provided for service of a summons
in a civil action. If the owner cannot be found. the order shall be served upon the owner
by posting it at the main entrance to the building and by four wccka` publication in the
official newspaper of the municipality if it has one, otherwise in a legal newspaper in the
county.
p'r ;y
4 "
Solid. 3. Filing. A copy of the order with proof of service shall be filed with the
i'
court admmulrator of di3tnct court of the county to which the hazardous but'.dmg is
i
�v"
located not gess than five days prior to tho filing of a motion pursuant to section 463.:9 m
r � ,r
enforce the order. At the unity of filing such order the municipality shall file far record
r
with the county recorder or registrar of tides a notice of the pendency of the proceeding.
dencribing with rea.onable certainty the lands affected and the nature of the order If
the proceeding be abandoned the municipality snail within ten days thereafter file with
the county recorder a notice to that effect
7
Laws 1963, G 393, 1 3. Amended by Laws 1978, c. 181, 1 :; Laws 1986. G 444: Laws 1986, tit Sp..
G 3. am 1, l 82
I.t.:
226
!NE EASE31F-V S. ETC. BUILDING LINE EASEh1ENTS. ETC.
of any hazardous building
U0 'ding or to raze or
Then, by reason of economic
.ro did not undertake repairs
an of building by public its.
suint to Lente. terminated
cm. App.1984. 954 N.W.2d
21 the governing body of
zardous building or parcel
.sal estate u provided in
i cast so assessed may be
C therein, at eight percent
:aporsdoos 1281.
,'to the grounds therefor.
ime for compliance; and
der will M made to Ne
,:ruated unless correedve
;eeifred In section 463.18.
• of record, or the owner's
copying tenant. U then is
for service of a summons
is served upon the owner
weeks' publimcion in the
a legal newspaper in the
1986 Amendment Laws 1989, C. 444. 4 1.
retrieved gender spadlk references applicable to
human beings throughout Minn. Stats. by adopt•
ing by reference propaed smendmcntr for such
revision prepared by the revisor of statutes purr.
Want to Laws 1984, r. 489. 1 21, and certified
and riled with the secretary of state on Jan. 24.
1986. Section 3 of laws 1786, C. 444, provides
that the amendments "do not change the sub•
trance of the sutures amended"
Note of Decisions
Construction and application I
Nodes 3
Requisites of order 2
1. Construction and application
This section which allows mats and disburaa
menu to a petitioner when there is no judgment
for tart and a judgment determining the rights
of the parties is entered is inapplicable to order
Luned under section 463.11 requiring defendant
to remove a husrdous building sod other prop
erty from his promises. Village of Zumbrous v.
Johnson, 196x. 280 Mita. 190. 161 N.W.2d 621L
Nonanident owner of real property looted
within village within stare must be personally
served with village order relating to violation of
building '1160on pursuut to Rud"
4.04 of the
Minnesota Rules of Civil Ptoadure when the
ownses out of state whereabouts are known.
Op.Atty.Gen., July S, 196&
Under the Huardous and Substandard Build -
lop Act it would be artaQb if owoere were
notified of the institution a( action. Lod in the
butane of an estets which bad not been probes
ed notice to the (mown heirs by serving o copy of
the order provided for In this section and passing
a publication of a notes to advise unknown heirs
§ 463.19
aid be sufficient Op.ALLy.t:vn.. 19% Jun.
Y-° 1966.
Requiatles of urdcr
" Order directing pnryerty uwnur W cumtit hat•
ardous condition or eliminate the -budding must
Specify necessary repsus, afford a reasonable
time for compliance, must state that a mcuon for
summary enforcement vnll be made for noncom•
pkuce, and grant 20 days from date of service
of order to allow property owner to answer.
Village of Zumbrota Y. Johnson. 196& 2SO )fine.
990, 161 N.W.2d 62&
3. Notice
Where municipal coryoredon seeks to have
private building destroyed because it presents a
hazardous condition. acute and opportunity to be
heard which are the essence of due preens of
law should be provided freely and unequivocally
to property owner, because of fact that judg•
ment adverse, in the absence of an emergency
situation, to the owner mule in lou without
compensation. Village of Zumbrota v. Johnson.
1968. 280 Minn. 990, 161 N.W.2d 626.
Notice issued by village council giving proper-
ty
roperty owner alternatives to elinunats hazardous
building and debris or to ewe an answer pans•
ut to speerfled statute wu not sufficiently per
rods to meet requirements for notice and oppor,
tnaity to be heard which tae essential conditions
precedent for envy of a default judgment in
district court action m compel the elimination of
a nuisance. Id
Notice issued by village council giving proper
ty owner alternatives to eliminate hazardous
balding and debris or to serve an answer pursu•
sot to specaled statues vas deficient In that it
filed to specify precisely whu owner was es•
panted to do to eliminate hazardous conditions.
and because It referred him to an obsolete state -
city arrangement U he chum to toe an answer.
Id.
4&1.18. Answer j
Within twenty days from the dart of service, any person upon whom the order is served
may serve an answer in the manner provided for the service of an answer In a civil action,
specifically denying such facts in the order u aro in dispute. or
laws 1985, 0.899, 14.
•s shall be filed with the 4&1.19. Default cues
he hazardous building la
suint to section 463.19 to If no answer is served, the governing body may move the court for the enforcement of
s:ity ahail fits for record the order. If such a motion is made the court may, upon the presentation of such
raency of the proceedin , evidence as It may require, affirm or modify the order and enter judgment accordingly,
nature of the order. ft fixing a time after which the governing body may proceed with the enforcement of the
days thereafter file with order. The court administrator shall cause a copy of the judgment to be mailed forthwith
to persons upon whom the original order wu served.
C. alas; Lowe 1980, let 9p, Laws 1185. e. 393, 1 L Amended by Laws 1916. lit Sp., a 3, sot 1,1 12.
237
FRA
§ 463.19
Vote* or Dcawons
to general t
Reriew
1. In seneral
Order vacating default judgment which had
been entered without proper notice to owner of
pruperty condemned us hurssrdou. or uppurtunity
to be heard could not be conditioned on the filing
of a bond by landowner to insure payment of
costs, disounements, and expenses which would
be incurred if judgment adverse to landowner
were ultimately rendered. Village of 2umbruta
v. Johnson, 1968, 2bl) Minn. 390, 161 N.W.2d 6:6.
Notice issued by village council giving proper
ty owner alternatives to eliminate hazardous
BUILDING LINE EASENEN"M ETC.
budding and debris or •o serve an answer pun
ant to specified statute was not sufficiently car,
twin to meet requirements for nouce and oppor.
tunity a be heard which are essential conditions
precedent for entry of a default judgment in
distract court action to compel the .lint—tion of
a nuisance. Id.
« itntew
Landowner, who was ordered by village court.
cd to remove cerrata allegedly hazardous build-
ing and penonaliry, and who an appeal W Su.
prime Court prevailed on ground that notice
issued by village council was deficient, was not
entided to uaauon of coeu .and duoumemenu.
Village of Zumorom v Johnson, 1463, ": 0 Stine*.
390, 161 N.W,2d 626.
363.:0. Contested eases
If an answer is filed and served as provided in section 463.18, further proceedings in the
action shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure for the district courts. except that
the action has priority over all pending civil actions and shall be tried forthwith. if the
order is sustained following the trial, the court shall enter judgment and shall fu a time
after which the building shall be destroyed or repaired. as the case may be. in compliance
with the order as originally filed or modified by the court. If the order is not sustained, it
shall be annulled and set aside. The court administrator of the court shall cause a copy of
the judgment to be mailed forthwith to the persons upon whom the anginal order was
served.
Laws 1965. c, 333, 16. Amended by Laws 1986, 1st Sp.. a 3, art 1, 1 8:.
46121. Enforcement of judgment
If a judgment is not complied with in the time prescribed, the governing body may
cause the building to be repaired, razed, or removed or the hazardous condition to be
removed or corrected as set forth in the judgment, or acquire the building and real estate
on which the building or hazardous condition is located by eminent domain as provided in
section 463.152 The cost of such repairs, razing, or removal shall be a lien against the
real estate on which the building is located or the hazardous condition exists and may be
levied and collected only as a special assessment in the manner provided by Minnesota
Statutes 1961. Sections 429.061 to 429.081, but the assessment shall be payable in a single
installment When the building is razed or removed by the municipality, the governing
body may sell Oil salvage and valuable materials at public auction upon three days'
posted nocica.
Lows 1965. t 393, 17. Amended by Laws 1974. a. 3u, 1 4.
1974 Amendment Inserted "or the hazard,
ous condition to be removed or corrected" and
inserted "or acquire the building and real estate
on which the budding or hazardous rendition u
located by eminent domain as provided in aeelton
463.152" in the first lenience: and insetted "or
hazardous condition eauts" in the second ten
fence.
Cron References
Correction of hazardous conditions, tee li 463.
161.
Coat for removal of budding by municipality
aoa 0 463.151.
Votes of Decisions
In tenerol I
Damages
1, In general
Where municipal corporation inks ua have
private budding destroyed because it presents a
ha amour condition, nouce and opportunity to be
heard which are the essence of due process of
law should be provided finely and unequivocally
to property owner, bemuse of fact that judg-
mant adverse, in the absence of an emergency
238
BUILDING LINE EASEMENTS. ETC.
t vitiation. to the owner results in lass without
F assoessauon, Village of Zumrota bv. Johmon,
1362, So Minn. 390, 161 N,W-24 626.
t Damages
City had power to raze building, after property
mier failed to correct hazardous conditions
167.21 Statement of moneys received
§ .163.,3
identified by city on premises. without acquiring
building by eminent domain or paying damages
for condemnation. Powell v. City of Clearwater.
App.1986, 389 N.W.;d 206.
The municipality shall keep an accurate account of the expenses incurred in carrying
out the order and of all other expenses theretofore incurred in connection with its
enforcement, including specifically, but not exclusively, filing fees, service fees, publics -
unit fees, attorney's fees, appraisers' fees, witness fees. including expert witness fees,
and traveling expenses incurred by the municipality from the time the order was
anginally made, and shall credit thereon the amount, if any, received from the sale of the
taivage, or building or structure, and shall report its action under the order, with a
statement of moneys received and expenses incurred to the court for approval and
0owance. Thereupon the court shall examine, correct. if necessary, and allow the
expense account, and, if the amount received from the sale of the salvage. or of the
building or structure, does not equal or exceed the amount of expenses as allowed, the
court shall by its judgment certify the deficiency in the amount so allowed to the
municipal clerk for collection. The owner or other party in interest shall pay the same.
without penalty added thereon, and in default of payment by October 1, the clerk shall
certify the amount of the expense to the county auditor for entry on the tax lists of the
county as a special charge against the real estate on which the budding is or was situated
Lad the same shall be collected in the same manner as other taxes and the amount so
collected shall be paid into the municipal a-ut ry. If the amount received for the sale of
the salvage or of the building or structure exceeds the expense incurred by the municipal -
try as allowed by the court, and if there are no delinquent taxes, the court shall dicot the
payment of the surplus to the owner or the payment of the same into court, as provided in
sections 463.15 to 463.226. If there are delinquent taxes against the property, the court
inall direct the payment of the surplus to the county treasurer to be applied on such
taxes.
Laws 1965, a 393. 1 B. Amended by Lawa 1974, a 729, 1 1.
1974 Amendment Inserted "attorney's fees'
a the ant sentence,
167,23. Payment, tender, deposit In court
The net proceeds of a sale under Section 483.:1 or section 463.4 shall be paid to
persons designated in the judgment in the proportions as their interests shall appear
9serein. Acceptance of such payment shall be taken as a waiver of all objections to the
-ayment and to the proceedings leading thereto on the part of the payee and of all
;ersons for whom the payee is lawfully empowered to act In case any party to whom a
-ayment of damages is made be not a resident of the State, or the place of residence be
mitnown. or the party be an infant or other person under legal disability, or, being legally
tapable, refuses to accept payment or if for any reason it be doubtful to whom any
,syment should be paid, the municipality may pay the same to the clerk, to be paid out
hider the direction of the court; and. unless an appeal be taken such deposit with the
:ark ehalt•bo deemed a payment of the award.
;awn 1965, c. 397, y 9. Amended by laws 1988, c. 444.
1188 Amendment laws 1986, c. 444. 1 1, sushi to Laws 1984, a 480, 1 21, and certified
•emoved gender _pecifie references applicable to and filed with the secretary of state an Jan. 44,
-amen beings throughudt Minn. Stats. by adopt- 1986. Section 3 of Lswa ON, c. 444, provides
:j by reference proposed amendments far such that the amendments "do not change the sub,
nvitian prepared by the revisor of statutes pur- stance of the statutes amended."
.a9
101
11
j 463.24 BUILDING LINE EASEMENTS. ETC,
463.:1. Personal property or fixtures
It any building ordered razed. removed, or made safe and sanitary by repairs contains
personal property or fixtures which will unreasonably interfere with the razing, removal.
or repair of such building, or if the razing or removal of the building makes necessary the
removal of such penomi property or fixtures. the original order of the governing body
may direct the removal of such personal property or futures within a reasonable time. if
the property or fixtures are not removed by the time specified, and the governing body
subsequently desires to enforce a judgment under sections 463.15 to 463 _6, it may sett
the same at public auction as provided in section 363.21, or if without appreciable value,
the governing body may destroy the same.
Laws 1965, n. 393. I 10.
463.25. Hazardous esesvatlona
It in any city, an excavation for building purposes is left open for more than six months
without proceeding with the erection of a building thereon. whether or not completed, or
if any excavation or basement is not filled to grade or otherwise protected after a building
is destroyed, demolished or removed, the governing body may order such excavation to be
filled or protected or in the alternative that erection of a building begin forthwith if the
excavadon is for building purposes. The order shall be served upon the owner or the
owner's agent in the manner provided by section 463.17. If the owner of the land faiLg a
comply with the order within fifteen days atter the order is served, the governing body
shall rause the excavation to be filled to grade or protected and the cost shall be charged
against the real estate u provided in section 463.21.
Laws 1965. c. 393, q 1I. Amended by Laws 1913, t I= art. S, q 1; [Awe 198$ a 444.
1973 Amendment laws 1971 4 1^..3, art 5.
Noun of Decisions
L7, wan a general authoivation for the consoiF
oon of the terms "vnllagea" and 'boroughe"
"sides"
1. In senerel
Inthe farm or the subsotutida of the
term "statutory cities" for 'villages" and/or
Nooaesident owner of real property locamd
within village within state most be personally
"boroughs."
served with village ardor misting to violation of
1986 Amendment Lw 1986, a 444, q 1.
building regulation pursuant to Rule 4.04 of the
removed gender specific references applicable to
Sfionesote Rules of Civil Procedure where the
human beings throughout 914a. State. by adopt,
Ing by reference proposed amendments for such
owner's out of state whereabouts aro known.
reviews prepared by the remor of statutes put
Op.Atty.Gan., 690-35, July _S. 1966.
suant to Laws 1984, r. 480, q 21, tad carolled
Village orders relating to building regulation
and filed with the secretary of stats on Jan. 24,
violations are official papers and should be
1986. Section 3 of Laws lose. c. u4, provides
signed by the mayor and the village clerk. Id.
Nuc the 0men1101e1001 "do tot change the Sao -
stance of the statutes amended"
463._51. Securing vacant buildings
If In any city a building becomes vacant or unoccupied and is deemed hazardous due to
the fact that the building is open to trespass and has not been secured and the building
could be made safe by securing the building, the governing body may order the building
secured and shall'cause notice of the order to be served upon the owner of record of the
premises or the owners agent by delivering or mailing a copy to the owner or agent at
the last known address. Service by mail is complete upon mailing. 11 the owner of the
building fails to comply with the order within ten days atter the order is served, the
governing body shall cause the building to be properly secured and the cost thereof may
be charged against the real estate as provided in section 463.21.
Laws 1973, a 520, q 1. Amended by Laws 1013, d. 123, art S. q 7: Laws 1086, t 444.
1973 Amendment Laws 1973, c, = art 3, into the term "cities" or the substitution of the
L7 wax, a general authonumn for the eonsoli• tans "statutory atin" for "villages' and/or
tioa of we terms "tnilain" and "boroughs" "boroughs."
241/
ctRrrrti.�� •.. �.
Born
Ir•
RCA
huts
ing tr
nevus
S—
aws
usiseas
4633
Ser
and
subjs
Lan:
87.x,
dam
Into a
4n. a
t. tet
Ca
dluq .
46311
No
to th
tom
doaa
Suss
Len,
in
swear
aeon
9
J
q s
Ij
BUILDING LINE EASEMEN'T'S. ETC. § 363.261
1986 Amendment. Laws 1986, c. 444. 4 1,
1986. Sawn 3 of Lowe 1986. c. 444, provides
removed gender specific references applicable to
that the amendments "do not change the sub.
human beings throughout Stinn. Suts. by adopt.
stance of the sutura amended."
ug by reference proposed amendmenu for such
tevuan prepared by the revisor of Stitutes pur
Library References
tuant to Law. 1984, e. 480, 1 21, and « -fied
Health and Environment —J2.
and f0ed with the secretary of sure on Jan. 21.
U.S. Health and Environment g9 28 to 36, 5't.
461.26. Local aete and charter provisions
Sections 463.15 to 363.26 are supplementary to other statutory and charter provisions
and do not limit the authority of any city to enact and enforce ordinances on the same
subject
laws 1965, a 393, 4 12. Amended by Laws 1973,
a 123, tat 5, 1 7.
1973 Amendment. Laws 1973, c. 123. Lrt 5,
ant to On emergency ordinance enacted following
17, was a general authorization for the mnsoli•
a tornado. Op.Atty.Gen., 59--a-15, June 14.
dation of the terms ",+pages" and "boroughs"
1963.
into the term "cities" or the substitution of the
term "tututory cities" for "villages" and/or
"boroughs."
Noun of 13"1110tts
L In genera
City round would have the authority to lmms•
diaudy Lod surnm rtly remove strucatres pursu• '
183.261. Relocation benefits
Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes. Section 117.56, or any other law
to the contrary, all acquisitions of buildings and real estato upon which buildings are
located by governmental subdivisions pursuant to the exercise of the power of eminent
domain as provided in section, 463.152 shall be acquisitions for the purposes of Minnesota
Staruta, Sections 117.50 to 117.56.
Laura 1914, e. 341, 6 S. Amended by lava 1978, a $ f 181.
1976 Amendment. laws 1710, c. 2, wit a obsol.ts references and cost Laws 1978, c. 4.
revieor'L bill providing for the corraetion of erro• 1 141, directed that a citation lm modified.
mous, ambiguous, omitted, anc umatuticttsl tad
INDEX
CONSULT GENERAL INDEX POCKET PART
r
241
M
F.
4-- a
RESOLUTION 88 -
WHEREAS, a petition was received by the City Council of Monticello requesting
action to abate a dangerous building, and
WHEREAS, a resolution was adopted by the City Council on July 25, 1988,
directing the City Attorney to proceed with the procedures required for the
abatement of dangerous buildings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO:
1. An order pursuant to authority granted under Minnesota Statute
Sections 463.15-463.261 prepared by the City Attorney is hereby
adopted.
2. Compliance with this order shall be accomplished within 45 days or
the City of Monticello will bring a motion before the District Court
for summary enforcement.
Adopted this 26th day of September, 1988.
Mayor
City Administrator
J
J
J
J
Council Agenda - 9/26/88
9. Consideration of Using Streetscape Surplus Funds for Additions to Base
Project. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Construction portion of the Streetscape project is nearing
completion which means that it is time for the City to define
additional (if any) work that should be done associated with this
project. It appears that after additional costs associated with
unexpected expenditures are removed from the contingency fund, there
remains $13,805 in the fund. A subgroup of the Streetscape Committee
met on Friday, September 23, 1988, to discuss the use of the unspent
funds and recommends that the funds be used to replace the sidewalk
along Walnut Avenue in front of Golden valley Furniture and install
tree additional ornamental street lights along the east side of Walnut
Avenue between Broadway and the parking lot. Council is asked to
review the use of the Contingency fund (see attachment) and make a
decision regarding the proposed use of remaining funds. Following is
a brief history of how the contingency fund amount was established.
As you recall, when the project was ordered, Council placed the
difference between the project contract amounts and the base bid
budget amount ($16,000) in the contingency fund ($16,767) thus
creating a fund total of $32,767. The savings created by the
favorable bids were not allocated for any specific purpose. As the
project has progressed, a sizable portion ($18,962) of the contingency
has been utilized or recently earmarked for specific purposes. The
attached budget report shows the detail regarding the use of the
Contingency fund. Please note that the purchase of two replacement
lights and the spare railings requires action by Council.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Accept the recommendation made by the sub -group of the
Streetscape regarding use of Streetscape Project Contingency
Funds which calls for purchase of one replacement two globe
light, one replacement four globe light, replacement bridge
railing, replacement of sidewalk and installation of electrical
conduit.along Walnut Avenue in front of Golden vally Furniture
and the Auto Store, and finally, installation of three ornamental
lights on the east side of Walnut Avenue between Broadway and the
parking lot. Funds remaining in Streatscape budget after
J �• completion of Alternative 1 will amount to approximately $392.
!� r•-'J"'It was the view of the subcommittee and City staff that the
purchase of replacement fixtures ie necessary, as future
replacement of fixtures is likely to be more expensive than the
cost to manufacture a few replacements today.
L /
Council Agenda - 9/26/88
It was Geoff Martin's view that the proposed sidewalk replacement
be the number one priority for funding if Council desires to use
remaining revenues. It was also his recommendation to use front
and side frontage measurements of adjoining property in
establishing the assessment for this improvement. Geoff also
suggested that the ornamental lighting be placed on the east side
of Walnut Avenue between Broadway and the Parking lot. The
Streetscape committee agreed with Martin's recommendation.
2. Consider recommendation and make modifications as desired by
Council.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council approve Alternative 1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Monticello Streetscape Project - Budget Report/Alternative I.
-9-
MCNTICELLO STRE-SCAPE PROJECT - BUDGET REPORT
ALTERNATIVE I.
ORIGINAL BUDGE, $333,600
PROJECT CONTRACT TOTALS 5300,633
CONTINGENCY AND "SURPLUS" FUNDS AVAILABLE '632,767
SEPTEYeER 23, 1989
FUNDS REMAINING $13.805
PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO BASE PROJECT os7.,�
Golden Valley Furniture/Harry' Auto Sidewal2. - Three Ornamental Lights - East Side of Waln
Bec.een Broadway and Par,<ing Lot
NET FUNDS REMAINING: 392
• Council Action Needed on Theso Items - Meeting of 9/26/88
Ij—,".
S 12
0
D
ADDED PROJECT COSTS TO DATE:
- Mobile Station Sidewalk and Curb
S4.207
- Broken Curb Reolacements
$680
- Extra Railing/Misc
$5.000
` *
- One two globe light - spare
$1.200 �
•
*
- One four globe light - soars
Railing
$1,700
$3,000
- Spare
- Trash Receotacles
($500)
- Contingency (Estimate)
$3,500
- Arrigoni
$175
/
TOTAL COST OF ITEMS ADDED TO BASE PROJECT
$18,962
(Contingency fund approx $16,000)
FUNDS REMAINING $13.805
PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO BASE PROJECT os7.,�
Golden Valley Furniture/Harry' Auto Sidewal2. - Three Ornamental Lights - East Side of Waln
Bec.een Broadway and Par,<ing Lot
NET FUNDS REMAINING: 392
• Council Action Needed on Theso Items - Meeting of 9/26/88
Ij—,".
S 12
0
D
Cat.-.ci_ minuses - 7/1�88
Gamziina. -.p^oa (S:7 ;e: device)
1. St. c..ty'3 .all _esri7al Seo
13. Cans_":atior. of Ca-=,n'_t7 Su:•Jey.
A53'—St- City Ae_-ini3t_1._ 'd tZ. CZ Cil that as :equested, staff
has deve: ted _._.. a: .. :•es f^. i.-1emertat :n of a r_� r t'y su.riey.
0'.:e___ 'tent on :] evtv..: •` :'3 Ccn'S of e3C�. alta:C3:i•le.
CaL'nc__ 3i__ acted `-a: he f5'JC:�_ a.dlic _C the G81ec ne =--ley
c_
ecasa tis ~ ._3t --s_ ny !::-.a --he sue:•ey +_ _e avai_acle in,
_rm :]r '_959 __ e% Set. - Se33:_.. mczitn made -v 31-' :_ - to
awa: the c:r_-unity su:vey ro;ect to St Coad State Gn:1e:3ity�Su:•Jey at
a ;rc:eez cost of $:JO. i!cr-: n see:nde_ _y ::an Tai:, Motion sassed
ursa:.ous1[.
15.
Cans:de:at'_an of ACroin:rAnt t] Plarninc C=r..-iissien.
It was acted by mayor G:ia:gMo that the Plarning Caris3lon was unanimous
is :eccmmc.dimg Mori Malone to thO C_w=33'lon. After discussion, motion
by 912.1 ?ai:, seconded by lope Tai: to a;;cove the ap.ointment of N.oci
Nalene to the ;os-. ion ofP'_anai-.g Q=_;ssitn menta:. Motion ;used
uran!.=us:y.
16.
Canside:alien of Resolution of awarding Bids on St:eetscare P:oject'
Gara:sL a dlect::cal, La scso_.a s 3ecs:::sn:ac Paa:ng. -
`Gaof mrtlt of Dahlgren, Shardlcw And Oban, Inc., was present to review
the bids associated with the st:eetaca;e project. NA:tin informed Council
t''at t`e bids received by the Cit1 were favorable and that the a= of the _
lar bid and alternates is less than the estimated pcojec(oost by over„j
516,000. it wax the C:nsansus of the Guncil that funds remaining for
st:setzc3;e project activity be placed is tie contingency fund associated
wit: the Pcoject and not be earma:ked for a s;eeifie project pur;ose)
N.otien made by Bill !ai: to a;pcove Resolution 88-21, Ae:sptiag Bid and
Aut.4oci:iaq Gnc:ac. for Gare:al Site C:rsr:uction and E1ect:1.cal WOVC
with Ar:iy:ni Brt`.e:s at a base bid amount of $152,311.60 and direct.
c-.n;%;cc_i:n of all altmat s excel for 3-.. Resolution 88-23,
Reso1 - Ac_s;tiny aid and Authar -'_ny C:r.t:act with`. Minnet=ka I:cn
..c::s f- thisof^:oish -, of theor-1.#s :as:iry at a base bid arcunz of
$_3' l: .00: Reza _um' 88-23 Reso1.,._:n Acte;t_ag Bid and Auzhaz.:ing
C:n:rac- for St:eeua;e Lardscs;:gig +*.th Mi-nesuta Va:1sy Landscape at a
base �-id amour of 525,3:9.00 and di:ec. c: -,'1s%_-_n of a., altcrAtes
asscciatsd w: 1-3.: Awa:! '-a :iy.`.• ny poc:ion of the =eetscape
project to the Ca::ns G: -.u; a: a _,d arcunt Of $49,638.00: award %:a
grates and t:ee you:a ;o::i:n of the S.:se:sta;e ;:]sec: to I::rsai:.`.
ac. at a bud arcus of S. ,633. •at.:n sec-rded by Wac:sr Sm: voting
?n fs'lo: of ::en A: a G::Ca.:a, lar. Fa::, 8:1. !a::, :ra::en $M2.
C;;cse_, Car 3::n:;aa. N.:t::r. ;asses.
of ?:alin.nsr, Pa:
Council Agenda - 9/26/88
to. Consideration of Resolutions Setting a Public Rearing to Adopt
Assessments for 88-OIB and 88-02 Project. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
With the East County Road 39 improvement project nearing tion, it
is recommended that an assessment hearing be scheduled for October 24,
1988, in order for the assessment roll to be certified fo collection
1989. The improvements also included property along County rom
the freeway to Mississippi Drive and the improvements of Dundas Circle in
the Oakwood Industrial Park for street and utilities.
The original bond financing for this improvement project, which also
consisted of wells !3 and f4 and the pump house project, anticipated that
an assessment roll would be adopted yet this fall for collection next
year. As a result, I have instructed City Engineer, John Badalich, to
start preparing the cost associated with this project for preparation of
an assessment roll. The project is close enough to being completed to
allow the assessment roll to be established.
It is proposed that the assessment roll be completed by October 7
allowing the staff sufficient time to mail notices to all affected
property owners and publish the public hearing notice.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Set a public hearing for the adoption of the assessment roll for
October 24, 1988.
2. Delay the public hearing for the assessments. This would not be in
the best interest for the City, as the project is nearly completed
and if not assessed this fall, additional tax levies would be
required to make up the deficiencies in assessment income.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the staff that the Council adopt the two
resolutions authorizing preparation of the assessment roll and setting a
public hearing for October 24, 1988.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copies of resolutions.
L
-10-
RESOLUTION 88 -
RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSES&4ENT
WHEREAS, a contract has been let and the costs determined for the improvement
of County Road 118, and County Road 39 between I-94 and Mississippi Drive with
watermains and between Mississippi Drive and County Road 75 along frontage road
with sanitary sewer extensions and appurtenant work, and improvements to East
County Road 39 between Mississippi Drive and city limits with sanitary sewer,
watermain, and appurtenant work: and along Dundas Circle with sanitary sewer,
watermain, curb, gutter, and street improvements, and the contract price for
such improvements is , and the expenses incurred or to
be incurred in the making of such improvements amount to
so that total cost of the improvement will be
NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is
hereby estimated to be , and the portion of
the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is
estimated to be
.2. The City Administrator, with the assistance of Consulting Engineer,
OSM, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially
assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or
parcel of land within the District affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in his office for public inspection.
Adopted by the Council this 26th day of September, 1988.
Mayor
City Administrator
RESOLUTION 88 -
RESOLUTION SETTING A HEARING 1
ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on September 26, 1988, the City
Administrator was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of
Improving County Road 118 and County Road 39 between I-94 and Mississippi Drive
with watermains and between Mississippi Drive and County Road 75 along frontage
road with sanitary sewer extensions and appurtenant work; and improvements to
East County Road 39 between Mississippi Drive and city limits with sanitary
sewer, watermain, and appurtenant work; and along Dundas Circle with sanitary
sewer, watermain, curb, gutter, and street improvements, and
WHEREAS, the City Administrator has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment shall be co;,plete and filed in his office for public inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 24th day of October, 1988, in the City
Hall at 7:30 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment, and at such
time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference
to such assessment.
2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the
official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he
shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. Be
shall also cause mailed notice to the owner of each parcel described
in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings.
Adopted by the Council this 26th day of September, 1988.
Mayor
City AdmLnlstrator
9
4
Council Agenda - 9/26/88
11. Consideration of Upgrading Streets in Monticello Industrial Park. W.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Early this summer, the City Council approved an evaluation study of the
Oakwood Industrial Park street system in regard to pavement strength.
The testing was performed in July by Braun Pavement Technologies and
involved loading or deflection testing on approximately 1.6 miles of
streets within the Industrial Park. Our primary goal was to determine
the in-place strengths and to obtain information in regard to an
upgrading to a 10 -ton, all-weather design for the Industrial Park which
would not inhibit heavy truck traffic in the spring.
The report was completed and delivered to the City just last week.
During our evaluation of the report we noticed that it was incomplete.
It was missing the northern portion of Fallon Avenue, that area crossing
Chelsea Road. This section is being sent under separate cover and should
arrive here for Monday evening's meeting.
The report basically indicates that all the streets within the industrial
Park, with a few small isolated areas of exceptions, are at or above the
7 -ton design. By making some improvements to lower rating areas, we
could safely obtain the following spring axle load ratings.
Road Designation
Chelsea Road
Dundas Road
Fallon Avenue
Thomas Circle
Thomas Park Drive
TABLE 1
Spring Axle Load
8 tons
8 tons
7 tons
10 tons
9 tons
upon review of the report, areas which are of lower strength than the
above ratings are as follows:
TABLE 2
Location
Thomas Park Drive between the
Roller Rink and Joyner's
Bowling Alley
Chelsea Road in front
of Clow Stamping
Chelsea Road between
Simonson Lumber and
Joyner's Bowling Alley
Dundee Road just south
of NAWCO building near
the intersection of 117
Spring Axle Load Rating
From 7.0 to 7.9 tons
7.2 to 7.4 tons
7.4 tons
6.7 tons
->>.
Council Agenda - 9/26/88
Location Spring Axle Load Rating
Dundas Road midway point 7.7 to 7.8 tons
near drainage swale and
slightly to the east
Dundas Road just north of 7.3 tons
the old IXI building near
Fallon Drive
These areas may need some additional work to achieve the ratings as per
Table 1. Additional study of these areas will determine the amount of
corrective work necessary if any. In order to achieve our goal of 10 -ton
all-weather roads for the Industrial Park (10 tons is the new county
standard), we would have to do the corrective work and then overlay the
roadways. The following is a list of the overlays necessary.
TABLE 3
Road Designation Overlay Thickness Required for 10 -ton
Chelsea Road 2.5 inches
Dundas Road 2.5 inches
Fallon Avenue 3.0 inches
Thomas Circle 0.0 inches
Thomas Park Drive 1.0 inches
At this time we have not prepared a detailed cost study for the
overlays. However, using a typical street width of 40 feet and a liberal
cost of $25 per ton for the overlay, one could see costa of $6.10 per
foot per one inch of overlay. For example, Chelsea Road with a 2.5 inch
overlay would cost $16 per foot, splitting both sides would be $8 per
foot. That would cost a 350 foot lot $2,800 if the City were to assess
the property owners for the upgrading. These costs are very rough, and
it's conceivable that an overlay price could come well below $25 per
ton. These costs also assume that the City would pick up the costs of
improving the trouble spots prior to overlays.
B. ALTERNATIVE AMONS:
1. The first alternative would be to have the staff develop a more
detailed cost study and hold a public hearing regarding the proposed
improvements based on the premise that all or a major portion of the
costs will be assessed to the property owners.
2. Authorize staff to prepare plans and specifications and go to bids to
determine actual costs for the improvements under the premise that
the City will pick up 100 percent of the upgrading costs.
J
-12-
Council Agenda - 9/26/88
3. Authorize staff to prepare plans and specifications and go to bids,
schedule a public hearing at the time bids are received on the
premise that we will assess 100 percent of the costs.
4. Upgrade and overlay only those areas of lower strength this fall as
maintenance to achieve the Table 1 ratings and consider upgrading in
1989.
5. Do nothing.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It seems appropriate that we should upgrade the roads in the Industrial
Park to allow free movement of heavy loads in and out year round. The
time table is such that it would be difficult to get a project completed
this year. It may be best to go with alternative #4 and improve those
low strength areas this year and bid the actual overlays for next
spring. We may see some very good prices next year, as the final wear
lift on County Road 39 will not be placed until the summer of 1989. This
would allow us time to develop some additional cost information and
discuss the proposed improvements with more property owners in the
Industrial Park prior to making an actual decision or holding a public
hearing.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the Pavement Strength Evaluation Report. Road Rater Data Design
Analysis Sections are available at City Hall. They are not included in
your agenda packet due to the bulk.
-13-
An expansion Of
MIDWEST PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT. INC.
'4 Concoreia Avenue, SI, Paul. MN 55104 - 612 i 644-M
September 12, 1988
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Mr. John Simola
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
Dear Mr. Simola;
EiRAw n .1
II
Cuamv S --s So- 1957
PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
cc.w.-C.<..+e.-
asp
4u..
Enclosed please find a copy of our report entitled
PAVEMENT STRENGTH EVALUATION
FOR
CITY OF MONTICELLO
we sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you
and to the City of Monticello. Should there be any questions
regarding the contents of the report or any of our other
services, please do not hesitate to call.
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional
Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
6"rD Gj - 9,,.�
David W. Janisch, P.E.
Registration Number: 18562
Date: Sha -ler
Oagmenl Managemen.. Taump . Asuarcn • 'Y / /
.'M v..' ..Y e... m IN, .—. .4"SI Cel 1. �IQnf4Y YM 1 Own. Ural ue .e W 1 ad.0 w !Etna. ut 1 ` ^y . n
INTRODUCTION
The City of Monticello contacted Braun Pavement Technologies,
Inc. to conduct deflection testing on approximately 1.6 miles of
city street. The testing was done on July 29, 1988. all of the
streets tested are located in the oakdood Industrial Park of
Monticello. The deflection testing was done using a Madel 2000
Road Rater at 100 foot intervals in both directions. The test
locations were staggered in either lane to provide a net
effective interval of 50 feet.
The purpose of this report is to evaluate and make
recommendations with regards to the in-place effective subgrade
R -value, Effective Granular Equivalency and maximum allowable
axle loads. Also, to make recommendations for overlay thickness
to obtain to a 10 -ton roadway. No traffic data was provided for
any of the roadways tested. The ESALs values which were used in
the analysis were derived from the Eagandale Industrial Park in
the City of Eagan, MN. This industrial park is similar to that
in Monticello and, therefore, similar ESAL values were used.
The report makes reference to 2331, 2341 and Class 5. These
refer to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT)
Standard Specifications for Construction (1983) Specifications
for plant mixed bituminous pavement, plant mixed bituminous
surface and aggregates for surface and base courses respectively.
(S
EQUIPMENT USED
A Model 2000 Road Rater (Figure 1) was Used for the
nondestructive testing (NDT) . The Road Rater is an electro -
hydraulically activated device that super -imposes a dynamic
sinusoidal load onto a static load. The amplitude and frequency
of the load are adjusted by the operator of the Road Rater for
each test point. The static load is mechanically adjusted and is
normally set on a daily basis. For this project, the static load
was set at approximately 3500 pounds. The dynamic load was held
between 3500 and 4000 pounds. This resulted in a continued
series of pulses applied to the pavement over a constant static
as shown in Figure 2.
An 18 -inch diameter steel contact plate was used to apply the
load to the pavement. The deflections were measured at the
center of the lead area and at 12, 24, and 36 inches behind the
center of the load plate. A diagram of the deflection basin and
deflection measurement locations is shown in Figure 3.
7�\
Figure 1. Model 2000 Road Rater
G)
WJ
1 � �
DYNAMIC LOAD
cz (Peak to Pat*)
STATIC LOAD
1 .
INCREASING TIME
Figure 2. Diagram of Road Rater Loading
0
cc
tv t0u w Lu 3
A
IL LL U. -4 - m
Lu aus
ca caa-
0jv
DEFLECTION BASIN SHAPE IS A FUNCTION OF
1) THICKNESS OF THE LAYERS
2) ELASTIC MODULUS OF THE LAYERS
Figure 3. Deflection Basin as measured by the M.cJol 2000 Road Rate. -
1p;
BASIS OF ANALYSIS
The analysis was based on the results of the deflection tests and
also on information furnished by the client as follows:
-the average annual daily traffic
-the thickness of asphalt surfacing
-the type of soil in the subgrade
In addition to the determination of the allowable spring axle
load limits for each section as listed in Table 2, design
analysis were included as requested which includes the following:
-the effective subgrade soil R -Value
-the recommended NDT thickness design
and/or reconstruction thickness as
appropriate
The results of the design analysis for each section are included
on a separate page followed by the computer printouts for that
section for easy reference.
The deflection tests are at intervals of about 0.1 mile and the
analysis and recommendations have been made over sections of
roadway with logical termini. Determining these recommendations
makes use of statistical procedures to prevent the adaption of
overly conservative values. This procedure raises the
possibility that the recommendations may not reflect the
condition or strength at some pointz. Therefore, the condition
of all the roadway surfaces should be monitored periodically to
observe whether occasional spots of distress occur.
The Braun Pavement Technologies program NDT was used for the
analysis of the deflection data. NDT incorporates the structural
relationships that were developed by MN/DOT Office of Research
and Development and the thickness design relationships for
flexible pavements from the 'AASHTO Guide For Design of Pavement
Structures -1986•. The design equation used is for an 85 percent
confidence level based on the average AASSTO recommended factors.
The traffic volumes provided by the client were transformed into
daily equivalent 18,000 pound axle loadings (ESALs) for the
analysis. This conversion was based on statewide averages for
vehicle distribution and weights as shown in Chapter 71 Pavement
Design of the ROAD DESIGN MANUAL, Part II. A tabulation is
included shoving the typical vehicle distributions and truck
factors.
The ESALs may vary by a considerable amount on low volume roads
and, if it is found that the ESALs are not representative of the
section, the analysis should be done over with the current
traffic data.
The analysis results and design recommendations for each of the
sections evaluated are placed directly before the computer
tabulations and plots for each of the sections evaluated. J
od
joi ® ® m W W fled M a"A
� J �
Table 1. Sections tested end Information furnished by City of Monticello
............... Pavement
Composition Data ...............
Age of Present
Surface Allowable
Roadway
Termini
Dyerlay Surface(g[j
ub¢ base
Traffic or Overlay Aele load
Chelsea
lotion Avenue to Oakwood Drive
1.5.
2331
6.0• Cl S
Road
2.0.
2331
Dundas
Oakwood Drive to lotion Avenue
1.5.
2341
6.0• CI S
Road
I.S.
2331
lotion
South and of Perk to 1.94
1.5.
2341
4.0• Cl S
Avenue
1.5.
2331
Thomas
Thomas Park to Cul-de-sac
1.5.
2341
5.0• Ct S
Circle
I.S•
2331
Thomas
Chelsea Rd I[. Jct.)•Chalsee Rd
(Y. Jct.) 1.S•
2341
5.0• Cl S
Park
I.S.
2351
Table 2. Oesion Recommendations
Dally
Road pesfenatiort
Termini
EStli
Chelsea
fallen Avenue to Oakwood Drive
100
Road
19 16.0 2.5
6
Dundee
Oakwood Drive to fallen Avenue
100
Road
111 IA.S 1.0
9
fallen
Roulh and of Part to 1.94
100
Avenue
Thomas
Thomas Part to Cul-de-sac
'S
Circle
Thomas
Chalaaa Rd If. Jet.)•Chelass Rd (Y. Jct.)
10
Park Ortva
Metal All overiay thicknesses are for 10 -ton roadways.
C,
........... Design Recommendations ..............
EOR Overlay
spr tno
R-Yslve ilnchc#1 finca
Aele load
16 16.0 2.5
0
19 16.0 2.5
6
iS 15.0 3.0
1
10 15.0 0.0
10
111 IA.S 1.0
9
J
expansion o!
MI iiu n,.
MIDWEST PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. Ouafiry Seti.cas Since 195%
1404 Concardia Avenue, 51. Paul, MN 55104 — 6121644-2996 PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
E•um of
Lr—.vwp�
September 22, 1988
Mr. John Simola
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
Dear Mr. Simple;
Enclosed are the corrected Road Rater results for Fallon Avenue
from south end of the Industrial Park to I-94. We apologize for
the oversight in only submitting a portion of this data with the
original report. I have enclosed two copies which are punched
so that they may be substituted in the binder for the sections
sent previously.
Once again, we sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of
service to you and the City of Monticello. Should you have any
questions regarding the contents of the report or any of our
other services, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
BRAUNPAE
VMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
4t,4 /n 60
David W. Janisch, P.E.
Senior Project Engineer
DWJ/ bw
Pove—nl Manapemenl • TesunQ • aoseucn
sae w.mp m.0 surf. Yinmfeeo, -M" Si C — ne apfnlelV W , &—E. k" .. Wwuen Ve , a.." aro lemon 41 , firs. 4
FALLON AVENUE FROM SOUTH END OF THE INDUSTRIAL PARR TO I-94
ANALYSIS
This section is 2465 feet long and consists of 1.5 inches of 2341
wearing course over 1.5 inches 2331 binder over 4.0 inches of
Class 5 base. The estimated daily ESAL count is 100. The
surface condition rating is 3.9 with low severity transverse
cracking found at nearly every test point. As mentioned
previously, M&P trucking is a new truck terminal which is located
at the northwest intersection of Dundas Road and Fallon Avenue.
Therefore, heavy truck weights are expected on these two
roadways.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
R -value - 16
EGE - 15.5 inches
Overlay - 3.0 inchesl (10 -ton design)
Tonnage - 7 tons per axle
DISCUSSION
'The overlay thickness recommended above applies only if the weak
areas at test locations at 704 and 1350 are repaired. It is
recommended that borings be taken at these locations to help
determine the cause of the low in-place pavement strength. The
required overlay thickness to obtain a 10 -ton roadway for these
two locations is 3.5 inches. A boring will help to determine if
additional asphalt should be placed or if the area should be cut
out and repaired prior to overlaying.
J
BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION N01 88-427
DATE OF TEST (MIO/U: 7/29/88 CITY OF MONTICELLO FALLON AVENUE
DAILY ESL's: 100
TEMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 105-105 from: SOUTH E N D OF INDUSTRIAL PARK
ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 3.0 to: INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94
TURFACE CONDITION RATI(IG: 3.9
AASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.73
COMMENTS:
(R) 6 (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION NI1H RESPECT TO THE CENTERLINE/MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTORIESTIMATED ESAL.
TEST
LOCATION FORCE FREE
(FEET) (KIPS) (HII
0 R ---- ----
101 R 3.01 15.1
206 R 3.03 15.1
III R I.01 15.1
401 R 3.01 15.1
S00 R 3.00 15.0
600 R 3.07 15.1
680 R --- ---
704 R 3.05 15.0
806 R 3.07 15.1
904 R 3.05 15.0
1000 R 3.14 15.1
1101 R 2.95 13.1
1146 L 3.03 15.1
1200 R 2.95 15.1
1250 L 2.99 15.0
1300 R 3.00 15.0
/ISO L 3.02 15.0
1402 R 2.95 15.0
1450 L 2.96 15.0
1300 R 3.00 15.0
1547 L 3.00 15.0
1602 R 3.04 15.1
1650 L 2.97 15.0
1712 R 3.00 15.0
1749 L 2.97 15.1
1800 R 2.97 15.0
1849 L 2.98 15.0
1890 R --- ----
1934 R 2.98 0.1
1930 L 3.06 15.0
2000 R 2.99 15.1
2050 L 3.04 15.1
2101 R 3.03 15.1
2149 L 3.00 15.1
2200 R 2.98 15.1
2249 L 2.99 15.1
2301 R 3.01 15.0
2349 L 3.03 15.1
2400 R 3.00 13.0
2465 R 2.95 13.1
--SENSOR READINGS (MILS)--
EFFECTIVE
EFFECTIVE
AXLE LOAD
DEFL
DEFL
DEFL
DEFL
SU86RADE
G.E.
RESTRICTION
11
12
13
IA
R -VALUE
(INCHES)
(TONS/A1LE)
---
5.32
----
3.60
----
1.46
----
1.08
--
21
---
16.4
----
8.0
5.18
4.15
1.39
1.03
19
19.7
8.8
5.00
3.89
1.55
1.06
20
20.2
9.0
5.75
3.86
1.42
1.04
2O
16.3
7.9
6.47
4.38
1.74
1.14
17
15.7
7.4
6.22
5.34
1.66
0.84
15
18.6
8.0
7.40
5.10
2.07
1.14
14
15.2
6.9
6.79
4.70
1.89
1.53
16
16.2
7.4
5.99
3.86
1.43
0.97
20
15.3
7.6
5.77
4.11
1.74
1.27
19
18.3
8.3
5.94
4.15
1.90
1.41
17
17.7
7.9
6.04
4.06
1.86
1.36
IB
17.0
7.8
6.37
4.42
1.96
1.44
16
16.0
7.3
6.36
4.54
2.09
1.61
13
17.9
7.7
6.05
4.09
1.95
1.57
17
17.5
7.9
7.60
5.11
2.10
1.87
14
14.8
6.8
4.63
2.99
1.40
1.29
24
18.7
8.9
5.66
3.68
1.39
1.28
20
15.8
7.8
5.96
4.16
1.86
1.48
17
17.8
8.0
5.94
4.00
1.62
1.37
IB
16.6
7.0
5.714
4.18
1.86
1.55
17
19.1
8.3
5.59
3.74
1.57
1.19
19
16.0
8.0
6.30
3.85
1.66
1.:5
19
14.4
7.2
5.89
4.30
1.73
1.19
17
17.8
8.0
5.16
3.63
1.55
1.32
20
18.8
8.6
5.04
3.62
1.70
1.34
19
20.0
8.9
3.43
4.16
1.82
1.38
17
20.1
8.7
6.80
4.37
1.56
1.13
18
14.2
7.0
5.53
3.90
1.I9
1.04
20
17.2
8.1
5.82
3.72
1.11
1.13
21
15.5
7.7
6.27
4.39
1.40
0.99
l8
15.7
7.5
5.05
3.51
1.43
1.02
22
10.2
0.6
3.26
3A2
1.10
0.97
23
16.4
8.1
4.80
3.65
1.23
0.90
22
10.0
8.8
3.91
4.28
1.33
1.04
19
16.6
7.8
6.27
4.59
1.14
0.94
17
16.3
7.6
3.54
3.93
1.18
0.89
21
16.6
8.0
5.17
3.62
1.33
0.90
21
17.5
8.3
COMMENTS
SOUTH EGDE OF PARK
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
CIL OUNDAS RD
L -RUTTING
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
CIL CHELSEA RD
L-TRANS.CR
L-TRANS.CR
BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- COMMISSION NOt 88-127
DATE OF TEST (M/DIY): 1/29188
CITY OF MONTICELLO FALLON AVENUE
DAILY ESAL's: 100
TEMPERATURE RANGE Ideq.F): 105-105
frac: SOUTH E N D OF INDUSTRIAL PARK
ASPHALT THICYNESS linchesl: 3.0
to: INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94
SURFACE CORDITION RATING: 3.1
SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR,: 1.73
`)
COMMENTS:
(R) 6 (l) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION
PITH RESPECT TO THE CENTERLINE/MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR/EST!MATED ESAL.
EFFECTIVE SUBGRADE R—VALUE
0 l i! 20
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 1)
c _t.,,,i.,,, ....i....i...
i....i....i... i,..,),...) SOUTH EGDE OF PAF
101
L—TRANS.CR
:06
L—TRANS.CR
311 —
L—TRANS. C.R
401
500
L—TRANS.CR
600
E=k.U44TR85 RD
806
L—TRANS.CR
904 —
L—TRANS. CR
1
J
1000
L—TRANS. CR
1101
L—TRANS.CR
1146
L—TRANS.CR
1=00
L—TRANS.CR
1250 i
L—TRANS. CR
L—TRANS.CR
1350 —
1402
1450
L—TRANS.CR
1500
1547
160-
1651)
L—TRANS.CR
1712
L—TRANS. CR
1749
1800
1849
IaS%, _
C/L CHELSEA RD
_ouo
_050
7101
L—TRANS.CR
=149
720rj
L—TRANS. CR
_-49
::0 1
.349
:4O,j
;;14.5
0 10 _0
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
BRAUN PAVVIENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - CO -MISSION N01 88-427
DATE OFTEST (.101Y):7/:9/BB CITY OF MONTICELLO FALLON AVENUE
DAILY ESL's: 100
TERPERATHE RANGE (0eg.F): 105-705 from: SOUTH E N D OF INDUSTRIAL PARK
ASPHALT THICKNESS (inchesh 3.0 to: INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94
1RFACE CONDITION RATING: 3.9
SEASONAL CDP.F.EC110N FACTOR: 1.73
CONrE!ITS:
IR) & (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION WITH P.ESFECT TO THE CENTERLINE/110DIF1ED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR./ESTIEATED ESAL
EFFECTIVE PAVEMENT GRANULAR THICKNESS (inches)
V 5 11) 15 0 25 zo 5 4(:) 45 50
o SOUTH EGDE OF F'A F.i
1� � 1 L -TRANS. CR
206 L-TRANS.CR
7111 L-TRANS.CR
401
500 L-TRANS.CR
600
E=hu`?Y� S RD
606 L-TRANS.CR
904 L-TRANS.CR
1000 L-TRANS.CR
1101 L-TRANS.CR
1146 L-TRANS.CR
1200 L-TRANS.CR
1250 L-TRANS.CR
100 L-TRANS.CR
1350
1402
1450 L-TRANS.CR
1500
1547
1602
1650 L-TRANS.CR
171$ L-TRANS.CR
1600
1849
1890 - C/L CHELSEA RD
201)0
2450
2 10 1 L-TRANS.CR
2149
2201) L-TRANS.CR
p 2249
Ti)1
:49
2401
2j¢J
V 5 X11, 115 20 rJ 130 =5 140 145 SV
BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. -
COMMISSION MOi 88-127
DATE OF TEST (M/O/Y): 7/29/82
CITY OF MONTICELLO
FALLON AVENUE
DAILY ESAL's: 100
TEMPERATURE RANGE (deq.F): 105-105
)roa: SOUTH E N D OF
INDUSTRIAL PARK
ASPHALT THICKNESS lim0es): 3.0
to: INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94
SURFACE CONDITION RATING: I.9
h
SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.73
�l
COMMENTS:
(R) 6 [L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION PITH RESPECT TO THE CENTERLINE /MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR/ESTIMATE] ESAL.
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AXLE LOAD (irons/axle)
0 _ 4
6 B 30 12 14 16 18
20
r! _i....i....�...i....1...,),...1....1....1.........1
SOUTH EGDE OF FART
101
L—TRANS.CF.
206
L—TRANS.CR
X11
L—TRANS.CR
401
500
L—TRANS.CR
600
E/kUDUWRaS RD
606
L—TRANS.CR
904
L—TRANS.CR
1000
L—TRANS.CR
1101
L—TRANS.CR
1146
L—TRANS.CR
1200
L—TRANS.CR
120
L—TRANS.CR
104
L—TRANS.CR
1_511
1402
14,0
L—TRANS.CR
1.'.100
1547
1602
1650
L—TRANS. CR
171
174
L—TRANS.CR
1600
1849
161;0 —
C/L CHELSEA RD
P96
_000
2ngq
L—TRANS. CR
2149
2=1111
L—TRANS.CR
j
'01
J
•19
�4i1Q
-•460
ri _ 4
6 8 1O 1: 114 16 1B
:0
CHELSEA ROAD FROM FALLON AVENUE TO OAKWOOD DRIVE
ANALYSIS
This section is 2548 feet long and consists of 3.5 inches of 2331
over 6.0 inches of Class 5. The estimated daily ESAL count is
100. The surface condition rating is 3.8 with low severity
transverse cracking and rutting at approximately 2/3 of the test
points. The City of Monticello's staff informs us that there is
a Mn/DOT maintenance shop located on this roadway. Mn/DOT was
contacted to find out if any traffic counts were done. They
indicated that they had not been. The maintenance foreman
indicated that most of the vehicles entering this roadway to the
maintenance shop were not heavily loaded.
DESIGN REC0MMENDATIONS
R -value - 16
EGE - 16.0 inches
Overlay - 2.5 inches (10 -ton design)
Tonnage - 8 tons per axle
DISCUSSION
The effective subgrade R -value indicates that the soil is very
uniform in strength throughout the section. The same is true for
the in-place pavement strength indicated by both the Effective
4f1 Granular Equivalency and the maximum spring axle load
�i calculations. The overlay recommendation given above is for a
10 -ton roadway.
0
DUNDAS ROAD FROM OAKWOOD DRIVE TO FALI.ON AVENUE
ANALYSIS
This section is 2600 feet long and consists of 1.5 inches of 2341
wearing course over 1.5 inches 2331 binder. This section also
has a 6.0 inch Class 5 base course. The estimated daily ESAL
count is 100. The surface condition rating is 3.9 with low
severity rutting located at approximately 1/2 of the test points.
According to the City of Monticello's staff, there is a new
trucking terminal, .MSP, located at the northwest intersection of
Dundas Road and Fallon Avenue. As a result the traffic volumes
are expected to be high on these two roadways.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
R -value 19
EGE 16.0 inches
Overlay 2.5 inchesl (10 -ton design)
Tonnage 8 tons per axle
DISCUSSION
1The overlay thickness recommended above is for a 10 -ton roadway.
However, it is recommended that a boring be taken at location 149
due to the extremely low in-place pavement strength. The overlay
requirement at this particular location is 3.5 inches. It is
recommended that a boring be taken at this location to'help
determine the cause of the low in-place pavement strength. This
area should be repaired prior to the application of the
recommended overlay thickness.
J
0
FALLON AVENUE FROM SOUTH END OF THE INDUSTRIAL PARR TO I-94
ANALYSIS
This section is 904 feet long and consists of 1.5 inches of 2341
wearing course over 1.5 inches 2331 binder over 4.0 inches of
Class 5 base. The estimated daily ESAL count is 100. The
surface condition rating is 3.9 with low severity transverse
cracking found at nearly every test point. As mentioned
previously, M&P trucking is a new truck terminal which is located
at the northwest intersection of Dundas Road and Fallon Avenue.
Therefore, heavy truck weights are expected on these two
roadways.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
R -value 15
EGE 15.0 inches
Overlay 3.0 inchesl (10 -ton design)
Tonnage 7 tons per axle
O CIT -1 9 111 013 1
lThe overlay thickness recommended above applies only if the weak
area at test location at 704 is repaired. It is recommended
that a boring be taken at this location to help determine the
cause of the low in-place pavement strength. The required
overlay thickness to obtain a 10 -ton roadway for his particular
® location is 3.5 inches. A boring will help to determine if
additional asphalt should be placed or if the area should be cut
out and repaired prior to overlaying.
a(
0
THOMAS CIRCLE FROM THOMAS PARR DRIVE TO NORTH END OF COL -DE -SAC
ANALYSIS J
This section is 301 feet long and is a cul-de-sac located at the
extreme north end of the industrial park. As a result, the
traffic volumes are considerably lower and mainly automobile
type. As a result, the daily ESAL count for this section is
assumed to be 5.0. The surface condition rating is 3.2 with low
severity transverse cracking found at nearly every test point.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
R -value - 19
EGE - 13.0 inches
Overlay - 0.0 inches
Tonnage - 10 tons per axlel
DISCUSSION
'The majority of the test points are at or above a 10 -ton load
limit. Only two of the test points, location 150 and 200, are
below 10 -ton. However, they are close enough to 10 -ton that no
problems are expected. No overlay is required to obtain a 10 -ton
roadway. If in the future it is found that the ESAL value of 5.0
is too low, it is recommended that the data be re -analyzed using
the accurate ESAL value. If the ESAL value is too low, the
calculated tonnage value will be artificially high.
J
11`
THOMAS PARR DRIVE FROM CHELSEA ROAD EAST JUNCTION
TO CHELSEA ROAD WEST JUNCTION
ANALYSIS
This section is 2349 feet long and consists of a 1.5 inch 2341
wearing course over a 1.5 inch 2331 binder. This section also
has 5.0 inches of Class 5 aggregate base. The estimated daily
ESAL count is 10. The surface condition rating is 3.8 with low
severity transverse cracking located at a few of the test
points.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
R -value a18'
EGE 14.5 inches
overlay 1.0 inchesl
Tonnage 9 tons per axle
DISCUSSION
lThere is one distinct weak area between test locations 1902 and
2049 of this section. The in-place pavement strength is
considerably lower particularly at test location 2003. It is
recommended that a boring be taken in this area to help determine
the cause of the low in-place pavement strength. Overlay
requirements for a 10 -ton roadway range from 2.5 inches to 3.0
inches in this area. It is recommended that this area be
repaired prior to the placement of the 1.0 inch overlay. Another
alternative would be to increase the overlay thickness in this
15C foot area to 3.0 inches. It may well be more economical,
however, to first repair this area and apply the thinner overlay
listed above. The subgrade soil is fairly consistent throughout
the section.
0//
DATA TABULATIONS AND PLOTS
J
The data tabulations consist of a heading section which contains
information relevant to the section tested. The name of the
section tested and information regarding its location is in the
upper right of each page. The left part of the heading contains
the date tested, the estimated Daily Equivalent 18,000 pound axle
loadings (EALs) that are applied to the pavement, temperature of
the asphalt mat at approximately one inch below the surface at
the time of test, thickness of all the bound asphalt layers, a
Structural Rating Number, a Seasonal Correction Factor, and a
line for comments relevant to the section or the analysis. The
Structural Rating Number is determined by the Road Rater operator
and is based on the following scale:
5 new pavement (no cracks)
4 unconnected linear cracking
3 large block pattern cracking
2 alligator cracking
1 potholes and loss of surfacing
The Seasonal Correction Factor is used to calculate the
deflection that is expected to occur during the spring thaw
period.
The tabulations contain ten numeric columns and one comment
column. These are described as follows:
TEST LOCATIONS: A reference used to locate the position of
the test point, usually in distance from the beginning of
the section.
FORCE: The amount of dynamic load applied to the pavement.
it is listed in kips. One kip equals 1000 pounds.
FREQ: The number of load pulses applied each second.
DEFL f1..14: These four columns contain the measured
deflection at each test point in mils. Ono mil is equal to
0.001 inch.
EFFECTIVE SUBORADE R -VALUE: The effective strength of the
subgrade soil as calculated from the resilient modulus
which is based on the deflections. It is expressed as an
Effective R-valuo based on the back calculated resilient
modulus of the aubgrado soil.
J
W
IM
3
EFFECTIVE GRANULAR EQUIVALE:iT (EGE): This is the granular
equivalent thickness that is needed to match the overall
pavement deflection.
AXLE IAAD RESTRICTION: This column contains the recommended
axle load restriction that would result in a spring
deflection equal to the deflection that would result from
the design section. The design section is determined from
the design procedure described in the "AASHTO Guide for
QDesign of Pavement Structures -198611.
CO1,MENTS: This column contains the Road Rater operator's
comments regarding the pavement in the vicinity of each test
point or location information.
A profile plot of,the AXLE WAD RESTRICTION is also produced if
the test location references are distances. Plots are usually
not produced if the tests are from large paved surfaces such as
parking lots. Plots are also produced for the Effective Subgrade
q�J R -Value and EFFECTIVE GRANULAR EQUIVALENT thickness if called for
i3 in the analysis. The plots are proportionally scaled for both
axis so that the information can be quickly reviewed to determsine
13 locations where changes occur.
K
DEFLECTION TESTING USING THE ROAD RATER ,
The Model 2000 Road Rater is a trailer mounted device which uses an
electrohydraulic force generating mechanism that is capable of
applying a vibratory load of variable force and frequency to the
pavement.
The Road Rater generates the load force by hydraulically oscillating
a 2000 pound lead mass up and down. The force generated is
proportional to the amplitude of the oscillation. This applied
force is measured electronically by three load cells attached to the
load plate. The dynamic load generated follows a sinusoidal wave
form and its amplitude and frequency are varied to suit the pavement
and analysis procedure.
During the loading, the pavement deflections are measured at four
locations on the pavement by seismic geophones. One geophone is
located at the center of the load area, and the other three
geophones are located at 12, 24 and 36 inches from the center of the
load olate. The four geophones measure the deflections
simultaneously, resulting in a measurement of the shape of the
deflection basin.
With the use of elastic layer analysis, the strength of the
individual layers of a pavement can be determined from the
deflection basin shape characteristics. The weaker a pavement
structure is with respect to the subgrade, the steeper the
deflection basin will be.
The deflection values inversely represent the strength, of the
specific area tested. This testing method is sensitive to the
pavement temperature and to the time of year. However, factors have
been developed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation to
adjust the deflections to represent a springtime deflection, of a
pavement with a mat temperature of 80 degrees F.
The testing is performed at a selected spacing to form a statistical
sample of the pavement strength. Variation in pavement strength
does occur between test points. Traffic volume, pavement thickness
and subgrade soil type information also is required to determine the
allowable spring axle loads for the pavement segment. If at any
time they are found to be different, the allowable spring axle load
should be recalculated.
The deflection tests provide extremely valuable information for
setting spring axle load limits and for design purposes. The
magnitude of the deflections will remain relatively constant
throughout the life of a pavement and will begin increasing only
when pavement distress develops. There are indications, however,
that the shape of the deflection basin will change within the normal
life of a pavement. Pavement condition, during its normal life,
should be rated by its roughness or rideability and the surface
condition. The surface condition of the pavement in the vicinity of
each test point is recorded at the time of the test, but the
roughness must be measured separately.
0/
QAreas with lower ratings than Table I
0 200 400
AVAILABLE PARCELS
4).
THIC PARK MOO
mm ...........
40:
V..... cj
CHELSEA
N/A
Ae".
z
10, 0 a
OUNDAS
Z
L
c!
r
71
GENERAL FWD
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
AT&T Inf. - Fire phone charges
3.95
27990
Ben Franklin - Toilet tissue
26.16
27991
Harry's Auto Supply - Supplies for Mtce.
107.06
27992
Buffalo Bituminous - Gravel
886.75
27993
EL Marketing - Election supplies
112.00
27994
Continental Safety Equip. - Repairs
174.16
27995
State Chemical Mfg. - Snow/ice for St. Dept.
535.00
27996
Communication Auditors - Fire Dept. repairs Y "
84.18
27997
Bergstrom's Lawn 6 Garden - Parts r , v ,��
h '-
17.32
27998
Moon Motors - Blades for mover , vv b+
12.95
27999
Voss Electric - Bulbs ak5 fit`="•
347.76
28000
Earl Andersen - Playground equipmen and signs
7,828.80
28001
Nelson Oil - Gas
375.50
28002
Maus Foods - Supplies for all departments
154.08
28003
Safety Kleen Corp. - Mtce. equipment for St. Dept.
42.50
28004
Sentry Systems - Water alarm system
90.00
28005
Biff's - Latrine rental - Softball fields
49.23
28006
Monticello Ford - Fire Dept. repairs
36.38
28007
Monticello Printing - Office supplies & mist. supplies
155.20
28008
Local G49 - Union dues
92.00
28009
Holiday - Fire Dept. gas
29.28
28010
General Rental - Dolly rental
5.83
28011
Wright County Treasurer - Property taxes due
1,019.33
28012
AL & Julie Nelson - Sub. renewal
13.75
28013
U. of MN. - Reg. fee for Jeff 0. for seminar
30.00
28014
Foster, Franzen, Carlson - Antique fire truck ins. renewal
58.75
28015
Alvin F. & Shirley Jones - Earnest money on property purchase
10,000.00
28016
Industrial Dev. Committee - IDC banquet ticket
150.00
28017
Emergency One. Inc. - Down payment on aerial ladder fire trk.
212,340.00
28018
• VOID
-0-
28019
Latour Conat. - Payment A5 - 39 East 6 Water supply line
24,322.05
28020
Rlchmar Const. - Payment O1 - Pump & Pumphouse project
12,687.25
28021
Gary Anderson - Mileage
104.55
28022
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg fees
130.00
28023
August payroll
56,952. 75
TOTAL GENERAL DISBURSEMENTS - SEPTEMBER
$647,241.55
1988 -- GENERAL FUND -- SEPTEMBER , .,�` '
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Rich Cline 6 Tony Strands - Repairs to F� Sre irucK'
21000.00
- 27879
•
E. F. Anderson - Paint �
392.73
27880
Audio Communications - Repairs to radios
295.00
27881
Monticello Office Products - Office supplies
115.37
27882
Viking Pipe Services - Televising sever lines
880.00
27883
Ironsmith, Inc. - Streecscape project expense
5,371.00
27884
Flicker's T. V. - Air conditioner for Mtce. Bldg. t4°' t
249.00
27885
Davis Wacer Equipment. - Parts for water towe� �eh�V tF•
72.34
27886
Century Labs - Supplies - Mtce. Dept. .i '- �
`�e„
80.60
27887
The Plumbery - Concession stand expense c
5,100.03
27888
Buffalo Bituminous - Sand
27,75
27889
Tack's Ind. Cleaning Supplies - Cleaning supplies - St. Dep
156.90
27890
Heikes Bro. - Parts for Water Dept.
399.66
27891
Quality Lawn b Mtce. - Repair timbers at Library
665.00
27892
Copy Duplicating Products - Library copy machine expense
36.00
27893
Servicemaster - Clean carpet b furniture at Library
460.00
27894
North Star Waterworks Products - Meters, etc. - Water Dept.
2,091.21
27895
Int. Society of Fire Serv. Inst. - Fire book manual
151.00
27896
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
99.00
27897
VOID
-0-
27898
Central MN. Council on Aging - Reg. fee for Karen Hanson
5.00
27899
LaTour Const. Co. - Payments for Water Supply line b
trunk water main
72,752.38
27900
Colleen Kuchenmeister - Reg. fee for 0. Koropchak - Star.Ct
75.00 -
27901
Corrow Sanitation - Contract
7,587.90
27902
U. S. 'Postmaster - Postage 'for machine ;,h t�.
500.00
27903
�4
Patty Salzwedel - Animal control and adaptions
485.00
- 27904
Anoka County Social Services - Payroll dad. - '-
210.16
27905
--Jerry 'Hermes - Library janitorial
227.50
27906
MN. Dept. of -Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
39.00
27907•
Yellow Freight'- 39 Project - reimb. by LaTour Const.
158.62
27908
S b L Excavating - Final payment on 86-7 project
2,000.00
27909
Corrow Sanitation - Land fill charges
1,516.80
27910
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - August
2,391.40
27911
Wright County State Bank - FICA, FWT b Mad.
4,810.22
27912
PERA - Peru W/H
1,333.45
27913
YMCA of Mpls. - Monthly contract payment
625.00
27914
James Preusse - Cleaning city b fire halls
450.00
27915
Arve Grimsmo - Mayor salary
175.00
27916
Dan Blonigen Council salary
125.00
27917
Mrs. Fran Fair - Council salary
125.00
27918
William Fair - Council salary
125.00
27919
Warren Smith - Council salary
123.19
27920
Richard Carlson - Planning Comm. salary
49,27
27921
Dick Martie - Planning Comm. salary
49.27
27922
Ms. Mori Malone - Planning Comm. salary
49.27
27923
Ms. Cindy Lemm - Planning Comm. salary
49.27
27924
Dan McConnon - Planning Comm. salary
49.27
27925
Colleen Kuchanmeiscer - Star Cities Conf. - Jeff b 011ie
115.00
27926
Janette Learseen - Inf. Center salary
105.75
27927
Wilma Hayes - Inf. Center salary
132,75
27928
C
Arrigont Oro. Payment ®2 - Streecscape Project
43,978.82
27929
North Central Public Service - Utilities
9.01
27930
Northern States Power - Utilities
7,763.53
27931
PSGI - WWTP contract payment for Sept.
22,083.35
27932
Norwest Investment Services - Computer payment
2,407.61
27933
-1-
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK N0.
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
154.00
27934
Ceramic Ind. Coatings - Block for concession stand
165.00
27935
AME Ready Mix - Concession stand
938.97
27936
Unocal - Gas
95.07
27937
LaTour Const. - Extra work on Ccy. Rd. 39
2,773.00
27938
American National Bank S Trust - Paying agent fee on bonds
567.21
27939
Patcy Salzwedel - Dog food and supplies reimb.
110.10
27940
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
1,007.27
27941
U. S. Postmaster - Box rental
16.00
27942
American National Bank d Trust - 1960 G. 0. Bond payment
26,670.00
27943
Wayne Mfg. Co. - Balance due on Christmas decorations
2,315.98
27944
Rick Wolfsteller - Mileage allowance
300.00
27945
Anoka County Social Seriices - Payroll ded.
210.16
27946
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
90.04
27947
PERA - Ins. premiums
27.00
27948
Country Lumber - Material for concession stand
665.22
27949
Paul Hoglund - Balance due on concession stand labor
1,950.00
27950
MN. Dept. of Health - Permit fee - Golf Course Road water ext
150.00
27951
MN. Pollution Control Agency - Permit - .
140.00
27952
PERA - Pere W/H
1,346.48
27953
Wright County State Bank - FICA, FWr & Med.
4,740.73
27954
ICMA Retirement Corp. - Payroll ded.
736.17
27955
Monticello Firemen's Relief Assoc. - 1988 State Aid
31,963.00
27956
E. H. Renner &'Sons - Final payment on Well 03
3,387.44
27957
Mark's Realty - Down payment on Stelton's property
10,000.00
27958
Jerry Hermes - Library janitorial
227.50
27959
Mrs. Patty Salzwedel - Animal control expense
485.00
27960
MN. Dept. of Nat. -Res. - Dep. Reg._ fees -
74.00 '
27961
Joseph &.Clarice O'Connor - Down payment on payment
10.000.00
27962'
Monticello Fire Dept. - Salaries
1,014.68
27963
MN. GFOA - MGFOA conference reg. fee
95.00
27964
League of MN. Cities - Municipal Amicus program (Legal) dues
152.00
27965
GAB Business Services - Ded. reimb. on ins. claim - J. Sandbeig
250.00
27966
Unitog Rental Services - Uniform roncal
128.00
27967
Flicker's T. V. - Tapes for council meetings
77.94
27968
Sentry Systems - Alarm system for Fire Dept.
72.00
27969
Century Labe - Snow/ice supplies
242.50
27970
Mid Central. Inc. - Fire Dept. supplies
36.00
27971
M2N. Conway Fire 6 Safety - Supplies - Fire Dept.
291.90
27972
The Plumbery -.Repairs
4.58
27973
Lindberg Decorating - Paint - Cicy house on Hart Blvd.
26.85
27974
Water Products - Water Dopc. supplies
2.341.06
27975
Wang - Computer mtce. and repairs
936.00
27976
Fair's Carden Center - City Hall supplies
18.95
27977
Brenteson Conac. - Streets expense
910.00
27978
Braun Eng. 6 Tasting - Tasting on East 39 project
444.00
27979
Granite City Electric - Streetscape expense
98.75
27980
M & P Transport - Equipment rental at WWTP
1.000.00
27981
Zahl Equip. Co. - Gas tank for Public Works Dept.
2,898.08
27982
J M Oil Co. - Gas - St.
1,634.68
27983
Yonak Landfill - Disposal of old concession stand
231.00
27984
Olson 6 Sons Electric - Repairs
322.76
27985
Wright County Treasurer - Police contract payment
11.896.63
27986
Simplex Time Recorder - Mcce. agreement on city clock
121.80
27987
National Bushing - Parte - Mtce.
112.37
27988
Marco Business Products - Paper 6 copy machine repair
278.78
27989
-2-
C
LIQUOR FUND
August payroll 8. 155.73
TOTAL LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS $114.265.74
AMOUNT
C1&CX
LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS FOR SEPTEMBER - 1988
y0.
Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor
362.11
13979
Griggs. Cooper b Co. - Liquor
3.120.75
13980
Quality Wine 6 Spirits - Liquor
828.87
13981
Ed Phillips S Sone - Liquor
208.45
13982
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
590.46
13983
Griggs, Cooper b Co. - Liquor
3,627.11
13984
Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor
141.60
13985
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
891.23
13986
Wright County State Bank - FICA, FWT and Med. taxes
648.22
13987
PERA - Para W/H
212.76
13988
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT
283.27
13989
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
944.89
13990
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
2,701.81
13991
Quality Wine - Liquor
622.96
13992
Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor
2,412.00
13993
Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor
49.83
13994
Ron's Ice Co. - Ice purchase
821.48
13995
Liefert Trucking - Freight
549.46
13996
Coca-Cola - Mise. mdse.
515.85
13997
Hi -Way Liquor - Reimbursement for cabinet
65.00
13998
Twin Cities Flag Source - Flag and flag pole
850.00
13999
Bernick's Pepsi Cola - Misc. mdse.
474.90
13400
Dahlheimer Diet. Co. - Beer
23.957.15
14001
Thorpe Diet. Co. - Beer
12.466.25
14002
Dick Beverage - Beer
2,090.75
14003
Rolles'Sanitation - Garbage contract
137.00
14004
Monticello Times - Adv.
36.00
14005
Jude Candy 6 Tobacco - Misc. mdse.
937.44
14006
Seven Up Bottling - Misc. mdea.
216.20
14007
Groselein Beverage Co. - Beer
18,786.42
14008
Day Diet. Co. - Beer
1,369.85
14009
Rubald Beverage Co. - Wine
202.50
14010
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
68.49
14011
Maus Foods - Misc. supplies
23.61
14012
Northern States Power - Utilities
958.62
14013
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
98.70
14014
Grigg:, Coopei - Liquor
5,899.05
14015
Quality Wine - Liquor
787.66
14016
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
687.87
14017
Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax for August
8.921.24
14018
PERA - Int. premium
9.00
14019
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll dad.
250.00
14020
Wright County State Bank - FICA, FWT and Mad.
565.07
14021
PERA - Para W/H
193.99
14022
Griggs. Cooper - Liquor
3.789.36
14023
Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor
666.11
14024
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
856.12
14025
Ed Phillipe 6 Sons - Liquor
1,432.57
14026
August payroll 8. 155.73
TOTAL LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS $114.265.74
CITY Or MOIRICELLO
Monthly Bull6in7 Department Report
Month of AUGUST , 1988
(
PCRMITS MID USES
Le9t Tht.
Same
Month Leet Yea[
la Yae[
PERMITS ISSUED
Month JULY Non th
AUGUST Laet
Y. To
Oe to
To De to
RESIDENTIAL
Hum bar
11
14
10
67
value cion
S 114,800.00 9 360,700.00
9
86,800.00 97,917,700.00
S2.162.000.63 00
teas
1,318.94
2,677.64
1,075.79
72,988.78
21,279.10
5urmh.1g..
55.90
178.90
42.33
1,955.04
1,074.10
COMMERCIAL
Numbs[
2
3
1
IS
16
Valuation
157,600.00 344,100.00
6,000.00
693,170.00
96),100.00
Peso
1,774.64
2,057.78
SI.00
5,177.77
7, 35a.82
Surcharges
78.90
122.05
7.00
]50.80
481.55
INDUSTRIAL
Num bar
1
I
va luetlon
752,000.00
4,600.00
Fees
4,612.57
' 6.00
Surcnar90•
376.00
2.30
PLUMBING
Number
2
S
2
44
37
Fee•
65.00
128.00
49.00
11527.00
851.00
Surcharges
1.00
2.50
1.00
22.00
17.50
OTHER9
Number
3
11
Ve luatlon
7,000.00
63,400.00
roes
60.00
742.50
Surcharge•
1.50
41.50
TOTAL NO. PERMITS
IS
22
16
141
127
TOTAL VALUATION
7 272,600.00 S 604,400.00 S
95,800.00: 5,442.230.00
7,129,700.00
TOTAL rECS
S 7,116.58 S
4,863.02 S
1,265.19
45,044.62
29,426.92
TOTAL SURCHARGED
S 135.80 S
301.45 6
47.89 9
2,745.34
S 1,571.45
CURRENT MONTH
' rem
Humber
tR Deis
PERMIT NATURE
Number PERMIT
SURCHARGE
valuation
Thle year'
Leet year
Singl• really
4 92,080.24
S 149.25
9298,500.00
IB
26
OUPI4•
1
2
Multi.fem lly
I
3
Com4rc lel
1 215.72
5.75
11,500.00
5
2
In6u.trlal
I
1
Ree. Gerapa•
7 767.30
20.00
40,000.00
6
0
Sign.
0
0
Public Building.
1 1,792.06
11].Oo
227,600.00
2
0
ALTERATION OR REPAIR
owe 11 lops
1 216.90
9.11
20,700.00
49
30
Comma rclal
I 50.00
2.30
5,000.00
9
18
Indu.trlae
0
0
0
PLUMOwn
All Types
5 126.00
2.50
27
44
ACCESSORY STRUCTURED
8v1ming Pont•
0
1
Deck.
1 15.00
.50
1,500.00
6
9
TEMPORARY PERMIT
0
0
DEMOLITION
0
1
if
TOTALS
22 64.863.02 1 707.45
3604.400.00
127
141
PLANS nLV1EN
011-1131
loo-,
L Ge1e4.
1ADIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT
ur
I Ila rvin L Ohlrlly Sttev/007 At- BI.
57.90 I
0.-1737
Illou ea
L Get eye
DY
Month of AUGUST 1988
I
�b0-1771
I Mous•
L l:et Ay.
1
PERMIT
DESCRIPTION
TYPE
NME/I.00ATI011
VALUATION
FEES
IMontloallu Country Club/1209 Golf Course Ddl
DL.07 ,
tNMOU
Illouse
L G.....
6Y
PERMIT
SURCIIMGE
PLUMBING
SURCIIARGE
IBB -1230
Beteched Gerepe
RG
F. rmlt 00,1111/119 No.t At... at -t
4,000.00
40.00
2.00
-1271
Ilou.o L Gelega
Sr
On rvin L Sid [loy 9t rev/807 Noel 01vor Gt.
BEL.500.00
528. 98
II.7S
10.00
.50
IOB
BS -1211
Ilouoe L Getege
6r
D. yle V1 c 11.. COneL./711 Me rvin I:IVOOd Ad.
59 ,70,.,0
412.74
29.05
23.no
.50
I68-1271
Iluu.. L Gereye
S!'
Itlll
[ L ll Coupt./SOI M[nnlsote Rt[aet f
]4_10,1,00
1]1.87
37.70
24.00
.50
Iron le L Garega Reohln9le
AJ
lard Andll oon/1000 Lett Rlvar Gtrall
1,500.00
15.00
.50
00-1275
I Ilouoe L :e[egs Reoldlny
AB
Garold tle[go[on/IIS Mervin El�oold Roed
7, 400.00
09.90
1.70
�Ub-17]0
00-1737
I Ilousl hath
1 All
Cha rZl 6talnma tr/91] Ee1t Ilt oedvey
I _500.00
15.00
.y0
OU -17]0
Golf Celt Sto[epe Bulldln9
I
1 C
dont l..s. fountty Club/1209 Golf Cout om n
11.500.00
1]0.50
5.75
00-12]9
In1111or Ramd111
I M
Jon L Ce too I.0 ndtw r9/)12 Eeet Rlvar 6[rmet
5,1100.00
50.00
2.50
Ho -1210
I Interl0[ Nemodal
AC
Ford Opl lCel/107 110[1% Nelnut St.-
5,000.00
50.00
2.50
1tl6-1]11
I house s Gareg•
16Y
Oeve KI 11 Cunat./111 Aevin 1-911y Orlve
I 75.900.00
477.91
37.95
25.00
.50
OU -1712
Ga[a9e Ilool
All I
Rlcherd L 7'errl Lumley/1500 Nool Pl ver St.
1.900.00
19.00
.95
1BU-1711
Ilouleeo Ge[eg1 Naehln9le
AU I
Palr10 111an19nn/120 Rlvarvlov Urlva
1,500.00
15.00
.SO
1110-1211
1 ^u n P-th
All I
Charles L Ce101 LLert/2001 ped Oek Lena
1,500.00
IS.00
SU
811-17.11
Interlol tles.mant Yln[eh
AU I
❑e vld 11roullle['d/1120 Meat plvlr GT[1at
I,SO0 00
15.00
.50
IIU-1714
Gn[e9s
I RG IJeek
Mevve 11/119 Rl vervlav Ih lvA
I 36.000.00
323.50
10.00 I
IBS -1217
Pump Ilouoe
I C I
[I" of 1lonticello/705 Cheleee Roed
727,400.00
I,Otl4. lU
113.80
26.0,
.50
TOTALS
if
! 604,100.00
1,735.13
300.95
170.00
2.50
PLANS nLV1EN
011-1131
loo-,
L Ge1e4.
ur
I Ila rvin L Ohlrlly Sttev/007 At- BI.
57.90 I
0.-1737
Illou ea
L Get eye
DY
I lleyla Vlehee Con.l./711 Me rvin r.lvood 4-411.7]
I
�b0-1771
I Mous•
L l:et Ay.
1
OY
I C L 0 fonat./501 Mlnue.ols 0l rnmt
17. ID I
all- I2?tl
(Goll Celt 111,119, Ilulldln0
G
IMontloallu Country Club/1209 Golf Course Ddl
DL.07 ,
IOU -1711
Illouse
L G.....
6Y
l4 va Y.laln [O,1et•/11] E1vin lanpl.y Ilrlvs
4).79
IUU-11.7
I Pump
Ilou.s
IClty of MonIICeIlO/205 C1lelsom Pont!
705.96
1
IJ
IC
PIAN DY
I TOTAL EVIL
S 979.119
TOTAL REVENUE 1 S, ILb. 47