City Council Agenda Packet 05-29-1990AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, May 29, 1990 - 7:00 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Fran Fair, Shirley Anderson, Warren Smith, Dan
Blonigen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held May 14, 1990.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaintc.
4. Review of community education/summer recreation program for
1990.
5. Consideration of adopting a resolution awarding bids for
Project 90-02, 7th Street and Minnesota Street.
6. Consideration of hiring operator/mechanic for Public Works
Department.
7. Consideration of hiring groundskeeper/janitor.
8. Consideration of adopting process governing information
submittal for variances, conditional use permits, and zoning
ordinance amendment applications.
9. Consideration of establishing a fee for special meetings of
the Planning Commission and consider providing compensation to
Planning Commission members that attend special meetings.
10. Consideration of authorizing purchase of base radio for office
of Public Works Department.
11. Consideration of approving gambling license renewal --American
Legion Club.
12. Consideration of gambling license ronewal--VFW Club.
13. Information --The Ride Across Minnesota- -Preliminary Plan.
14. information --City Engineer review of PCA Draft Permit for
Wastewater Treatment Plant--Kjollberg West.
15. Consideration of adopting a resolution requesting assistance
for the placement of flood elevation reference marks and
signing of 100 -year flood mark at various locations within the
city of Monticello.
City Council Agenda
May 29, 1990
Page 2
16. Consideration of inspection criteria and grid system for city
of Monticello sidewalks.
17. Consideration of approval of bills for the month of May.
18. Adjournment.
NOTE: Meeting is on TUESDAY due to Memorial Day on Monday.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, May 14, 1990 - 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Ken Maus, Fran Fair, warren Smith, Shirley
Anderson, Dan Blonigen
Members Absent: None
2. Approval of minutes.
Item #8 on the April 23 minutes was corrected to include the
vote of the Council.
After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson to
approve the regular meeting minutes of the Monticello City
Council held April 23, 1990. Motion included approval of the
meeting minutes of the special meeting held January 29, 1990.
Motion was seconded by Dan Blonigen and carried unanimously.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
Linda Smith of Little Mountain Flowers submitted a petition to
the City Council requesting that the City regulate the
commercial activity of transient merchants in the community.
Smith noted that the retail merchants are concerned about the
commercial survival of the businesses that must compete with
transient merchants and scavengers who, for a small fee, are
permitted to compete against the city -based retailers. Her
concern was that the outsiders undercut local retailers with
inferior merchandise and non-existent services. Smith
requested that the City develop ordinances that control
transient merchant activity.
Mayor Maus thanked Linda Smith for the letter outlining the
retailers concerns and noted that the City Council will bring
this item up as a regular agenda item.
4. Consideration of appeal on a public nuisence order.
Applicant, Luke Torell.
Mr. Torell requested that the vehicle that he is storing
behind his residence be allowed to remain there at least 90
days even though the vehicle is not operable and in violation
of the public nuisance ordinance. Torell indicated that he
does intend to get the vehicle in working order.
Page 1
a
Council Minutes - 5/14/90
Fran Fair asked why Torell doesn't place the vehicle in the
garage. Mrs. Torell indicated that the garage is filled with
other items and cannot accommodate the vehicle.
After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by
Fran Fair, to provide Mr. Torell 60 days in which to comply
with the public nuisance ordinance. Motion carried
unanimously.
5. Consideration of a conditional use request to allow a daycare/
headstart program in an R-2 (single and two family
residential) zone. Applicant, First Baptist Church/Wright
Countv Communitv Action Headstart Proqram.
Arlene Wirth of the Wright County Community Action Headstart
Program was present to describe the daycare/headstart activity
proposed for the Baptist Church site. Arlene noted that the
facility is serving Monticello children who otherwise would
need to travel to other communities to receive the headstart
services.
Ken Maus asked City staff if there might be a problem with the
headstart student use of the nearby park area. John Simola
i noted that the park does not include a tot lot; however, he
could see no reason why the children wouldn't be allowed to
use the area as long as they are supervised.
A local resident, John Holler, asked if the City would look
Into making the park bigger to accommodate the number of
children that will be using the park from the headstart
program.
After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by
Fran Fair, to grant the conditional use request allowing a
daycare/headstart program in an R-2 (single and two family
residential) zone. Motion carried unanimously.
6. Consideration of conditional use permit which would allow
retail/commercial activity in a PZM zone. Applicant, JKMV
Partnership/21st Century Builders.
Mayor Maus relinquished the chair to Acting Mayor, Fran Fair.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the site plan and
outlined the suggested conditions associated with this permit.
He also noted that the Planning Commission had recommended
approval of the conditional use permit subject to the
applicant obtaining a variance which would allow the northerly
r most access onto Cedar Street to be located within 40 feet of
the Sth Street right-of-way.
Pago 2
02-
Council Minutes - 5/14/90
O'Neill also went on to note that during the excavation and
grading of the site placing it in the condition it is today,
material was deposited underground in an area along the
northern boundary of the property. O'Neill informed Council
that it is likely that some of this debris is located on the
City 5th Street right-of-way.
Dan Blonigen suggested that a condition be added to the permit
which would require that the developer remove all debris
material dumped on City right-of-way prior to issuance of a
building permit.
Fran Fair also noted that the debris material should be
removed from the 5th Street right-of-way as a condition of the
conditional use permit.
After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Dan Blonigen, to approve the conditional use
permit subject to the following conditions:
1. Development of a final landscaping and berming plan
creating effective transition between commercial and
residential properties as determined by the City Planner.
9
A bond in the amount of 1008 of the cost to install
L•
berming and landscaping shall be provided to the City
prior to issuance of a building permit.
2.
Development of a retaining wall shall be accompanied by
Installation of a safety fence for the purpose of
eliminating access to the edge of the retaining wall.
The fence shall be made of weather resistant material and
be at least 6 feet high.
3.
Prior to issuance of building permit, drainage and
retaining wall construction plans shall be approved by
the City Engineer.
4.
The southerly most access onto Cedar Street shall be
aligned with 6th Street.
5.
The northerly most access onto Cedar Street shall be
moved 40 feet to the south of 5th Street, eliminated, or
a variance allowing the access to be located at this
point shall be obtained.
Page 3
0
Council Minutes - 5/14/90
6. Applicant shall remove all debris previously placed on
the 5th Street right-of-way along the northern boundary
of the property. Removal process must be reviewed by
City Inspector. Debris must be removed prior to issuance
of a building permit.
Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of approval of preliminary and final plat of
Kirkman Addition (K -Mart). Applicant, The Lincoln Companies.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill described the preliminary and
final plat of the Kirkman Addition and noted that the plat
cleans up a complex set of metes and bounds legal
descriptions. In addition, the plat development is a
requirement of the development agreement between the City and
The Lincoln Companies and is in sufficient compliance with the
standards noted in the subdivision ordinance.
Dan Kling of OSM suggested that one modification to the plat
might include the outline of the area needed for on-site
ponding. This area would be indicated as such on the plat and
could not be used for any other purposes. Assistant
Administrator O'Neill asked if the pond area identified on the
plat would commit the City to any type of long-term
responsibility for maintenance. Kling indicated that
identification of the pond area on the plat would not
necessarily require that the City be responsible for future
maintenance of the pond area.
After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Warren Smith, to approve preliminary and final
plat of the Kirkman Addition subject to placement of the
identification of the pond area on the final plat. Motion
carried unanimously.
B. Consideration of rezoning request of land south of realigned
7th Street right-of-way trom PZM (performance zone mixed) to
B-3 (highway business) zoninq. Applicant, The Lincoln
Companies.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the proposed
amendment to the zoning map calls for amending the zoning map
to reflect the final alignment of the 7th Street right-of-way.
Pago 4
LOA
Council Minutes - 5/19/90
After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by
Fran Fair, to adjust the zoning map in a manner reflecting the
final alignment of the 7th Street right-of-way in the area of
the Monticello Mall/K-Mart development. The land area between
the original alignment and final alignment is to be rezoned
from PZM to B-3 zoning. Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of resolutions authorizing the sale of bonds for
Tax Increment District 1-1 (7th Street Project) and refunding
of 1983 G.O. Bond alonq with Meadows 2nd Addition phase II
improvement.
Catherine Polta reviewed the proposed resolutions authorizing
sale of bonds. Administrator Wolfsteller noted that with the
bid opening scheduled for May I8 for the improvement of 7th
Street and Minnesota Street as part of the K -Mart project, it
is now time to consider authorizing sale of bonds to finance
these improvements as part of the City's Tax Increment
District 1-1. The City has already incurred costs and land
acquisition for the 7th Street alignment. With K -Mart now
under construction, it is recommended that authorization be
granted to sell bonds in the amount of $560,000, which is
consistent with the adopted budget within the tax increment
t plan. According to the adopted budget, the tax increment
4- revenue that will be generated from the K -Mart project will be
sufficient to retire the bonded indebtedness and additional
revenue will be available in the future from proposed
assessments pertaining to Minnesota Street and 7th Street
improvements paid by The Lincoln Companies and others. They
can be utilized by the City for its improvement funds in the
future.
After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by
Shirley Anderson, to approve a resolution authorizing bond
sale for the 7th Street improvement project in the amount of
$560,000. Motion carried unanimously.
SEE RESOLUTION 90-19.
Page 5
Council Minutes - 5/14/90
1p. Consideration of adoptinq ordinance amendment which would
allow operation of a prototype furnace usinq rubber products
as fuel in an I-1 zone.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that the
Planning Commission had recommended that the City adopt the
ordinance amendment which would allow operation of a prototype
furnace using rubber products as fuel in the I-1 zone on a 4
to 1 vote. O'Neill also went on to review the proposed
conditions associated with the operation of the furnace.
Ray Schmidt of Universal Equipment Manufacturing, along with
Wes Sprunk, provided answers to Council's questions regarding
the operation of the furnace. Schmidt noted that if approval
Is granted, his company will be occupying the structure in the
near future and should be employing up to 20 people by next
summer. Schmidt also went on to note that the conditions
suggested by the Planning Commission are acceptable, and his
company is willing and able to comply with all requirements
noted.
After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Fran Fair, to approve an ordinance amendment
establishing operation of a prototype rubber burning furnace
incidental to a principal use as a conditional use in an I-1
zone provided that:
1. The furnace must meet all existing or future air emission
standards as established by federal or state pollution
control agencies.
2. Stack height must be high enough to eliminate potential
of stack gases being trapped at the ground level by the
effect of wind flow around buildings.
3. Before a date set by the City, furnace will undergo
emissions testing on prototype furnace and applicant will
apply for an air emission permit from the PCA even if
exempt from PCA regulations. Furnace design must moot or
exceed proportion requirements for a one million BTU
furnace as required by the PCA. Failure of emission test
during prototype development or failure to obtain
permission to sell this product in Minnesota shall
terminate conditional use permit.
Page 6
0
tt Council Minutes - 5/14/90
l..
14
L..
4. Regular use of the furnace shall be limited to the
heating season. Non -heating use of the system shall be
limited to testing and demonstration. Furnace shall not
be operated for the sole purpose of reducing waste tires.
5. A 6 -foot, 908 opaque fence shall be used to screen waste
tire storage areas. No waste tires shall be in plain
view. The site may not contain more than 75 unprocessed
tires at any one time. The site may not be used as a
tire transfer station.
6. Complaints made by area property owners about the furnace
emissions may be sufficient cause for the City to
withdraw the conditional use permit and, therefore, halt
furnace operation.
7. Waste ash and particulate recovered, if deemed hazardous
by the Pollution Control Agency at some time in the
future, shall be treated at that time as hazardous waste
and shall be disposed of in a manner approved by the City
of Monticello and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Motion carried unanimously.
In reviewing the conditions above, necessary stack height is
to be determined by the Pollution Control Agency given the
characteristics of the area; and the date by which the testing
of emissions is completed shall be established by City staff
and dependent on the date by which the furnace begins
prototype operation. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 188,
11. Consideration of conditional use permit which would allow
operation of a prototype furnace using rubber products as'
fuel.
Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Dan 8lonigen, to
approve issuance of a conditional use permit allowing
operation of prototype furnace using rubber products as fuel
subject to conditions noted by ordinance. Motion carried
unanimously.
Pago 7
9
Council Minutes - 5/14/90
12. Consideration of a resolution a::ardinq bids for Project 90-03,
street and utility improvements for the Meadows 2nd Addition,
Phase II.
After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by
Shirley Anderson, to award the project to the lowest
responsible bidder, which is Redstone Construction of Mora,
Minnesota, in the amount of $81,899.55. Motion carried
unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 90-21.
Motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Warren Smith,
to adopt a resolution authorizing bond sale calling for
refinancing of a 1983 Meadow Oak bond issue and the Meadows
2nd Addition improvements in the amount of $730,000. Motion
carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 90-20.
13. Consideration of acceptinq appraisal for park dedication
purposes --West Prairie Partners plat.
After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by
Dan Blonigen, to provide the developers with two options for
establishing the valuation of the development area. The City
will accept the County Assessor's valuation for 1990 taxes at
$17,200, or the City will accept the appraisal of the property
by a third party independent of the original transaction and
certified to do appraisals according to accepted standards.
Voting in favor of the motion: Warren Smith, Fran Fair, Dan
Bloniaen, Shirley Anderson. Opposed: Ken Maus.
14. Consideration of a zoninq amendment to amend the entire
section of Chapter 18, Flood Plain Manaqement Ordinance.
Applicant, City of Monticello.
Council was informed by staff that the City is required to
amend the flood plain ordinance as requested by the Department
of Natural Resources. In order for area residents to qualify
for flood insurance, the City must be in compliance with all
flood plain management regulations, which would be
accomplished by updating the existing flood plain ordinance.
After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by warren Smith, to approve the amendment to the
flood plain ordinance as outlined. Motion carried
unanimously. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 189.
Page 8
Council Minutes - 5/14/90
15. Consideration of zoninq ordinance amendment reducing
convenience food parkinq requirement. Applicant, Shingobee
Builders.
O'Neill reported that Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on this matter and recommends approval of the proposed
amendment outlined below. Planning Commission reviewed the
technical data showing that the current ordinance requires
parking in excess of the parking demand generated during peak
periods experienced by convenience or "fast food" shops.
O'Neill informed Council that Shingobee Builders requests that
the City consider amending the parking requirements associated
with convenience food establishments. The proposed reduction
amounts to a significant reduction in the convenience food
parking requirement and could be accomplished by placing the
"convenience food" activity in the same parking requirement
category as restaurants, night clubs, taverns, cafes, and
private clubs serving food and drinks.
O'Neill went on to note that according to the zoning
ordinance, the Subway Sandwich Shop clearly meets the
definition of a convenience food establishment; therefore, it
appeared clear-cut that the sandwhich shop needed 60 parking
spaces. After further investigation, it was found that the
City of Monticello, in years past, has used the "restaurant"
parking requirement when establishing the parking requirements
associated with other "convenience food" establishments,
including Wendy's and McDonalds. In light of this
information, staff contacted the City Planner and researched
other ordinances regulating parking associated with
convenience food activity.
O'Neill reported that convenience food parking requirements
vary from city to city. Roseville, for instance, requires
about the same number of convenience food parking spaces as is
required by the existing Monticello ordinance. On the other
hand, recent traffic studies indicate that the parking ratio
for restaurants is adequate for convenience food activities;
therefore, there does appear to be a rationale for reducing
the convenience food parking requirement based on the traffic
study.
Ken Maus noted that the research on convenience food parking
supports what the City has been doing.
Dan Blonigen was concerned that the degree by which the
ordinance is being amended is excessive.
Pago 9
0
Council Minutes - 5/14/90
Rick Wolfsteller noted to Council that the convenience food
parking requirement originally applied to drive-in facilities,
which require significantly more parking area than fast food
establishments. The ordinance amendment proposed reflects
changes in the delivery of this type of food service which no
longer is typified by people eating food in their cars at the
restaurant site.
After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by
Warren Smith, to amend the zoning ordinance by moving
convenience food parking requirements from 3-5 (H), number of
parking spaces required, Section 13, to Section 19. Voting in
favor: Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson.
Opposed: Dan Blonigen. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 190.
16. Consideration of ordinance amendment deleting suretv bond
requirements for on -sale liquor license aoplicants.
After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by
Warren Smith, to amend the ordinance by deleting the surety
bond requirement, as the City is not now required by the state
to obtain a surety bond in the amount of $3,000 before issuing
on -sale liquor licenses. Motion carried unanimously.
SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 191.
Administrator Wolfsteller noted that all applications for on -
sale retail licenses still must file with the City and the
state a certificate of liability insurance in an amount not
less than $300,000, which should adequately protect the
public.
17. Consideration of qrantinq annual approval for municipal
licenses.
Ken Maus noted that some of the private clubs are actively
advertising to the public, which is not consistent with their
private club status and municipal license fee paid. Maus
noted that with the issuance of private club liquor licenses,
the license should include the provision that the
establishment must not advertise or serve liquor to the
general public.
After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Dan Blonigen, to approve the municipal licenses as
outlined and include a reminder to the private clubs of their
status and notify them that advertising liquor sales that aro
open to the public may result in the withdrawal or withholding
of private club liquor licenses. Motion carried unanimously.
Pago 10
0
Council Minutes - 5/14/90
18. Consideration of sale of excess right-of-way at the
intersection of service drive and East County Road 39
adioininq Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 19, Block 3, Hoqluncl Addition.
Area residents affected by the proposed sale were in
attendance. After discussion, motion was made by Warren
Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to sell the property on
a contract for deed basis at $.25 per square foot. Terms of
the contract are to include a 7 -year payback period at 88. In
addition, the area residents shall be responsible for the
platting of the area affected by the sale. Motion carried
unanimously.
19. Consideration of accepting a portion of annual sidewalk report_
and adopting a resolution settinq a public hearina.
After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by
Shirley Anderson, to authorize staff to post warning signs at
the location of substandard sidewalks and notify property
owners of the disrepair of these sidewalks. Motion carried
unanimously.
It was the consensus of the Council to review the sidewalk
system report at the next Council meeting set for Tuesday,
May 29, and possibly set a public hearing for sometime in June
1990.
20. Other matters.
After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Fran Fair, to designate the south side of Broadway
for Monticello Liquor to the intersection of Highway 25 as a
30 -minute parking area based on the finding that there is no
immediate accessible parking for businesses in that area of
the block, and the nature of the business (short-term
convenience) dictates short-term parking while nearby business
such as the Monticello Theater require longer term parking.
Motion carried unanimously.
There being no further discussion, the meeting adjourned.
W��o
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
Page 11
501
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
Review of community education/ summer recreation program for 1990.
(R.W.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Mr. Duane Gates, Community Education Director for the school, will
be present at the meeting to review and update the City Council on
the summer recreation program scheduled for 1990. As you know, the
City of Monticello contributes annually an amount toward the summer
recreation program sponsored through the community education
system. For the year 1990, the budgeted amount is $16,500.
I believe Mr. Gates will explain where our funds are being
allocated within their program, but it is my understanding that in
the past, the City has contributed money toward defraying the cost
of a swimming program at the school and also for such events as tee
ball for the youth as part of the summer school program.
Although it has not been accomplished at this point, it has been my
intent to do a more detailed survey of surrounding communities,
including those in the twin city area, to determine what
involvement the city usually has in regard to summer recreation
programs for its youth. Some comments have been made that it is
the City's responsibility to sponsor and fund programs for summer
recreation, and other indications are that schools and other
organizations fund these activities. In the future, I hope to be
able to present a survey to give the Council an idea of what other
communities do actually provide. Although the City of Monticello
does not currently run any summer recreation programs, we do
contribute the $16,500, which certainly has to cover a large amount
of the cost in running a tee ball program and/or swimming lessons,
etc. As to what other activities are normally provided for the
youth, I am not sure at this point what other communities provide.
School officials have indicated that they do feel the school system
has taken over a lot of responsibility for recreation activities in
Monticello that maybe should have been the responsibility of the
City. For example, all swimming activities take place on school
property utilizing their indoor pool, and many communities fund
that program through the city. In addition, all of the tennis
courts currently avallablo within the city of Monticello have boon
provided by the school, and many communitios do provide public
tennis courts. It appears that the City Council may have to
address this issue in the future as to what, if any, additional
facilities should be provided by the City rather than through the
school system. It's possible that Mr. Gatos' presentation may shed
some additional light on this subject.
At this point, there is no action needed by the Council other than
discussion with Mr. Gates concerning the upcoming recreational
program scheduled.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Recreational program summary provided by community education.
92,
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 882
Sheldon D. Johnson, Superintendent
'
Telephone (612) 295-5184
P. O. BOX 897
MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA 55362
BOARD OF EDUCATION
MEMO
Donald Donn
Charman
James Herbst
Clerk
TO: Monticello City Council
Kathleen Swinshart
Treasurer
FROM: Duane Gates, Community Education Director
wuaam Bellach
Director
SUBJ: Summer Recreation Program
Marcy Caasana
DATE: May 25, 1990
Director
Ediorard Holto.ay,
The purpose of this memo and appearance before the City
Director
Council on May 29 is to review plans for the Summer
Recreation Program and answer any question you may have
this regarding this program.
ADMINISTRATION
As you know, Warren Smith is the City Council's
Mlchost Bernadino
appointed representative to the Monticello Community
Ass. Suol.nnstiucton
Education Advisory Council. At a recent Advisory
2955184
Council meeting he suggested that I appear before the
4hardWiters
City Council to keep you informed of the various
luness manager
activities within the Summer Recreation Program which
2955184
is funded in part by the City Council (this year the
LyndonSonlu
city budgeted $15.500.).
High School Principal
2952917
The attached summary sheet lista the proposed
Rosen voices
activities and estimated costa.
High School Principal
295291)
The figures listed below give you a general idea of
Kenalt Benin
participation figures from last years program.
Middle School Prinuom
893 - in 20 activities ranging from t -ball to tennis
295518)
910 - open gym
Kay Douglass
858 - swimming lessons
Elementary Principal
295-5184
4608 - open swim
222 - tripe
Bruce No.ak
1195 - Preschoolers in the Park
Elementary Principal
400 - Concert in the Park
295.2974
Rkh" FAe
Registration for this summer is currently underway and
AthleticDirector
preliminary enrollment figures will be available Tuesday.
295.?D117
2952
Paul Lemke
Please feel free to contact me at any time during the
spinal Education Director
summer or throughout the year. if you have any questions
2955185
regarding the Summar Recreation Program or Community
+aoatn
Education in general. My office number is 295-2915.
numty Education err.
•2919
Thank you in advance for the opportunity to appear
Candace Baron
before the Council.
Anal. Community Edua. Dir.
2952915
92,
May 25, 1990
MONTICELLO SUMMER REC PROGRAM
EST. COST
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
Ball Programs
$4,480.00
Swim Lessons
$6,950.00
Open Swim
$1,012.00
Open Gym
$425.00
B'ball-elem
$400.00
B'ball-6-11
$1,520.00
Tennis
$740.00
Soccer
$420.00
Kids Games
$170.00
Fri Fun Time
$100.00
Track Clinic
$100.00
Wrestling
S50.00
Solving Mysteries
$160.00
Preschool in Park/Concert
$1,935.00
Gym/Tumbling
$880.00
Phy. Fit/Weight Rm
$1,700.00
Volleyball
5400.00
S21,442.00
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
$588.00
Neon Sweats
Pre July 4th
Photography
Artworks
Goodie Bake
Preschool Picnic
Preschool Castle
Scavenger Hunt
Pizza/Pool party
Cake Decorating
Ice Cream Social
Hawaiian Party
$568.00
SUPPLIES/EQUIP
S850.00
TRANSPORTATION (SP. EV)
$750.00
PUBLICITY
$950.00
ADMINISTRATION
Director (In-kind)•
Assist. Director (.25) $9,000.00
Secretary (.20) $4,400.00
OPERATIONAL EXPENSE (In-kind)'
-Pool Maint. 6 chemicals
- Facility Maint.
FICA AND FRINGES (In-kind)•
•Fees collected help off set in-kind posts.
$2,550.00
$13,400.00
$37,980.00
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
5. Consideration of adopting a resolution awardinq bids for
Project 90-02, 7th Street and Minnesota Street. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The bid opening for the proposed 7th Street project was held
at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, May 18. Six bids were received
ranging from $242,581.93 from R.L. Larson Excavating in
St. Cloud, Minnesota, to a high of $285,943.30 from Northdale
Construction. The low bid from R.L. Larson Excavating is well
under the engineer's estimate, and the City Engineer has
recommended the award be made to R.L. Larson Excavating.
Enclosed you will find a breakdown of the bid costs, including
contingency, administration, legal, engineering, inspection,
and bonding costs versus the estimated costs of the original
financial model.
As can be seen by the attached information, there is
approximately a $46,000 savings over the original estimated
cost of the construction portion of the project. It should be
noted that an additional retaining wall had to be added to the
south side of 7th Street near Locust Street to stabilize the
existing parking facilities. Even with this addition, the
cost of the 7th and Minnesota Street improvement project is
significantly lower than previously estimated.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to award the 7th Street and
Minnesota Street Project 90-02 to R.L. Larson Excavating
of St. Cloud, Minnesota, for the amount of $242,581.93.
2. The second alternative would be not to award the bid.
This seems to be inappropriate, as the bid costs are
significantly lower than those previously estimated.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the staff recommendation that the City award the project
as outlined in alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of bid tab; Copy of bid costs; Letter from OSM
recommending award; Copy of resolution for adoption.
L
BID TABULATION
FOR
STREET AND UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS','
l ft
AND APPURTENANT
WORK
7TH STREET AND MINNESOTA STREET
6
PROJECT NO.
90-02
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
BIDS OPENED: May 18, 1990
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
11:00 A.H.
6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
ADDENDUM
BID
TOTAL
CONTRACTOR NOTED
SECURITY
BID
Annandale Contracting x
5% bond
$252,197.04
Buffalo Bituminous x
59 bond
$274,153.75
La Tour Construction x
5% bond
5200.857.30
Northdalo Construction x
5% bond
$205,943.30
Redstone Conatruction x
5% bond
$261,102.45
R.L. Larson Exc. x
5% bond
$242,501.93
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS 1S A TRUE
AND CORRECT TABULATION OF THE BIDS
AS RECEIVED ON:
DATE: May 18, 199n
BY:
Dan S. Kling
•Donotoo Corrocted Figure OSM Comm. No. 4534.00 6 4535.00
0
BID COSTS
PROJECT 90-02
4
Original
ConstructionI
Admin.,Legal
Financial
Cast
Contingency
Subtotal
Eng.,Insp.,Bond
Total
Model
Difference 1
17th Street
$126.086.00
$12,608.60
$138,694.60
$37,447.54
$176,142.14
$175,000.00
($1,142.14)1
Street
$28,487,00
$2,848.70
$31.335.70
$8,460.64
$39,796.34
$50,000.00
$10.203.66
IMinnesota
7th St. Storm Sewer
$42,381.50
$4.283.15
$46,664.65
$12.599.46 l
$59,264.11
$70,000.00
$10.735.89
Minn. St. Storm Sower
$17,455.28
$1,745.53
$19,200.81
$5.184.22 I
$24,385.03
$30.000.00
$5,614.97
Minn. St. San. Sewer
$12,102.10
$1,210.21
$13,312.31
$3,594.32
$16,906.63
$30,000.00
$13,093.37
Minn. St. Water
$16,070.05I
$1.607.01
$17,677.06
$4,772.81
$22.449.87
$30,000.00
$7,550.13 I
1
$338.944.12
$385,000.00
$46,055.88
4
ONOrr
schelen
X
Mayeron Q
Asso[Idt[S, In[.
2021 fast Hennepin Avenue
MlnnCdt%�05, MN 55413
,,12.331.8660
�— May 23, 1990 FAX 331-38U6 s
[n nccrs
Surveyors
Planners
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Attn: Rick Wolfsteller
Administrator
Re:. Street and Uti:ity Improvements and Appurteita„ t Work
7th Street and Minnesota Street for the
City of Monticello, Minnesota
Project No. 90-2
OSM Comm. No's. 4534.00 and 4535.00
Dear Mr. Wolfsteller:
Bids were received and read for the above project at 11:00 A.M. on May 18, 1990. Six (6)
bids were received. R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. 800 Highway 10 S.E., St. Cloud, Minnesota
56304 submitted the lowest bid in the amount of $242,581.93. All bids were checked for
accuracy and tabulated. As can be noted on the attached form, the Engineer's Estimate was
$289,753.
We recommend award of the contract to R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. in the amount of
$242,581.93. Attached is the Bid Tabulation.
Very truly yours,
ORO SCHEI,GN•MAYERON
aASSOCIATESNC.
� 0
.Dan Kling, P.E.
Project Manager
DK/cmw
05/90•com.rw
cc: R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc.
Q
*Denotes Corrected Figure
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT TABULATION OF THE BIDS
AS RECEIVED ON:
DATE: jMay 18. 12 IL
BY: MIA, '&I
Dan . Kling
OSM Comm. No. 4534.00 6 4535.00
0
BID TABULATION
FOR
STREET AND UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS
AND APPURTENANT WORK
7TH STREET AND MINNESOTA STREET
PROJECT NO.
90-02
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
BIDS OPENED: May 18, 1990
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
11:00 A.M.
& ASSOCIATES,
INC.
ADDENDUM
BID
TOTAL
CONTRACTOR NOTED
SECURITY
BID
R.L. Larson Excavating X
53 Bond
$242,581.97
Annandale Contracting X
58 Bond
$252,197.04
Redstone Contruction X
5% Bond
$261,102.45
Buffalo Bituminous X
5% Bond
$274,153.75
Latour Construction X
5% Bond
$280,857.30
Northdale Construction X
5% Bond
$297,166.30+
*Denotes Corrected Figure
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT TABULATION OF THE BIDS
AS RECEIVED ON:
DATE: jMay 18. 12 IL
BY: MIA, '&I
Dan . Kling
OSM Comm. No. 4534.00 6 4535.00
0
RESOLUTION 90 -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement
of 7th Street from Locust Street to Minnesota Street and Minnesota
Street from the existing bituminous south of 6th Street to 7th
Street, including construction of sanitary sewer, water main
extensions and storm water drainage facilities and appurtenant
work, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law,
and the following bids were received complying with the
advertisement:
Annandale Contracting $252,197.04
Buffalo Bituminous $274,153.75
LaTour Construction $280,857.30
Northdale Construction $285,943.30
Redstone Construction $261,102.45
R.L. Larson Exc. $242,581.93
AND WHEREAS, it appears that R.L. Larson Exc. is the lowest
responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into the attached contract with
R.L. Larson Exc. In the name of the City of Monticello for the
Improvement of 7th Street from Locust Street to Minnesota
Street and Minnesota Street from the existing bituminous south
of 6th Street to 7th Street, including contruction of sanitary
sewer, water main extensions and storm water drainage
facilities, according to the plans and specifications
therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the
office of the City Administrator.
2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
return forthwith to all bidders the deposit made with their
bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and
the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has
boon signed.
Adopted by the City Council this 29th day of May, 1990.
Mayor
City Administrator
0
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
Consideration of hirinq operator/mechanic for Public Works
Department. (J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
With the transfer of Richard Cline to the Water/Sewer
Collection Department, we are left with a vacancy as an
operator/mechanic ir. the Public Works Department. We placed
an advertisement in the twin city and local papers and
received 64 applications for the position. Out of the 64
candidates, a selection committee consisting of the City
Administrator, myself, and Roger Mack, selected 8 individuals
for interview.
The interviews were concluded by Thursday afternoon, May 24.
After careful deliberation and the checking of references, the
selection committee recommends that the City Council hire
Joseph Kovich of 220 Leighton Drive, Big Lake, to fill the
vacancy of operator/mechanic. Mr. Kovich has a well-rounded
background and has skills in areas covering almost all of the
job description and should fit in well with very little
training. It should be noted that the committee unanimously
felt that Mr. Kovich was the most qualified individual for the
position. There was some discussion about the fact that Pat
Kovich, who is one of the deputy registrars at City Hall, is
the wife of Joseph Kovich. The committee felt this was not a
problem, as the departments are totally separate from each
other. If the Council has a problem with this, we could
select the commit.,.ee's second choice.
As always, the hirinr, of the individual would be contingent
upon passing the required City physical. Again, the position
of operator/mechanic is a union position, and the individual
would start at 808 of the current union wage for the first
year, then jump to 908, and after 18 months would go to 1008.
The current top wage is $11.82 per hour.
a. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to hire Mr. Joseph Kovich
to fill the position of operator/mechanic contingent upon
paasing of the City physical.
2. The second alternative would be to hire the committee's
second choice.
3. The third altornative would be not to hire for the
position or to look at other individuals.
C
I
C.
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator, Public
Works Director, and Street and Park Superintendent that the
City Council authorize hiring of Joseph Kovich as outlined in
alternative il.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the job description for operator/mechanic. /
4
C
OPERATOR/MECHANIC
FOR
STREET/PARKS DEPARTMENTS
Nature of Work
This is public works maintenance and repair work including a
variety of duties ranging from unskilled manual labor to skilled
mechanical work in the operation, maintenance, and servicing of
vehicles and heavy equipment.
work involves responsibility for the safe and efficient operation
of varied tools and equipment used in the performance of public works
construction and maintenance. Work also involves the performance of
manual labor related to municipal street and park operations.
work of this class is distinguished by the variety of asaignments
undertaken, initiative required and equipment operated.
Work is reviewed for acceptability in progress, through job
performance evaluations, and observation of results obtained. work
is performed under limited supervision of the Street/Parks foreman.
Examples of work
- Operate a variety of power operated tools, equipment, and
vehicles engaged in public works maintenance, construction and repair
activities.
- Perform a variety of manual and skilled tasks including street
swooping. grading, digging, loading and snow removal.
- operate a front and loader in loading trucks and materials and
anow, digging and shaping, assisting trucks with Curb cleanup of
residential areas and performing other tasks as required in tho use
of a loader as assigned.
- Operate a road patrol in grading operations or snow and ice removal.
- operate a truck plow in snow removal activities.
- Operate welding and related equipment, jack hammers, chain news,
compressors and other power equipment; keep work areas clean and orderly,
maintain stock room and inventory.
rol
t�
- operate a roller in tarring streets, lawn movers and snow blowers,
and park equipment.
Perform carpentry duties and mechanical repair, servicing and
maintenance duties on all city equipment as required. 46
- Repairs, adjust hydraulic systems; replace hydraulic motors,
hoses and fittinga.
- Repair and adjust drive, brake, steering, electrical, cooling
and related systems as required on light and heavy equipment.
- Replace regulators, alternators, starters, wiring, gauges and
other components as required.
- Perform minor tune-ups and rebuild equipment to meet special
uses.
- occasionally direct the work of temporary, seasonal, and other
employees as required.
- Attend training programs for mechanics, operators, and other
public worke'related duties.
- Perform other work as required.
Desirable Qualifications
Traininqand Experience
A combination substantially equivalent to public works experience
including the operation, maintenance and repair of a variety of heavy
and light equipment used in municipal street and park operations.
- valid class "e" State of ninneacta driver's license.
- Relevant experience or training equivalent to a practical working
knowledge of maintaining and servicing light and heavy equipment.
- A high school education or GED equivalent.
- Residency within the corporate city limits is not a requirement,
but in the event that all other qualifications are equal, added weight
will be given to this factor.
Raowiedgee, Abilities, and Skills
- Considerable knowledge of the principles of operation and
servicing of heavy equipment including the adaptations and specialized
In
uses to which equipment can be put in meeting emergency or other unusual
conditions.
- Knowledge of the traffic laws, ordinances, and regulations involved
in equipment operation.
Knowledge of the occupational hazards involved and the safety
precautions necessary in equipment operation.
- Knowledge of the practices, methods, tools and materials used
in the maintenance and repair of automotive, maintenance, construction,
and related equipment.
- Knowledge of the operating principles of gasoline and diesel
engines, and of mechanical components of automotive, maintenance,
construction, and related equipment.
- Ability to perform welding, painting, and carpentry tasks
incidental to other assignments.
- Ability to perform manual labor associated with major mechanical
work in related equipment.
- Ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships
and to understand and follow oral and written communi:ationa.
- Skill in the operation and servicing of a variety of public
works maintenance equipment and to perform a variety of maintenance,
repair and construction assignments related to street and park operations.
Physical Requirements
- The individual must be in excellent health as a variety of tasks
at times can require heavy lifting, bonding, climbing, and exposure to
severe weather conditions. Sound safety practices shall be a requirement
for this position, along with an ability to perform for extended periods
of time in emergency situations.
ft
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
7. Consideration of hiring qroundskeeper/janitor. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Tom Schumacher, who had filled the City's permanent part-time
position of groundskeeper/ janitor for many years, is unable to
continue in the position due to a severe medical problem with
his knee. We had hoped that Tom would be able to recover and
come back to work, but this does not appear likely.
Tom's position became a part of the union at the request of
the Minnesota Department of Labor with an amendment to the
contract in 1989. Full pay for the position was $6.40 per
hour plus $.25 per mile for vehicle use and pro -rated health,
holiday, and vacation benefits. Based upon the union contract
with an 18 -month pay step, this individual would start at 808
of the top wage.
This job is somewhat unique in that the hours vary
significantly from season to season, and the job is basically
365 days per year, which includes cleaning, closing, and
opening of restrooms. This often means an hour of work around
9:00 p.m. in the evening as well as holidays and Sundays. Our
hopes were to find an individual that would be able to stay in
the position for some time and not someone who was looking for
simply a summer job.
After placing advertisements in the local papers, we received
12 applications for the job and recommend that the City hire
Mr. John Lukach of 222 Kjellbergs Park in Monticello. John
has a background in the building and grounds maintenance
field. Upon approval by the City Council, we would schedule
the required physical next week and have John start as soon as
pobsible.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to hire Mr. John Lukach of
Monticello, Minnesota, for the position of groundskeoper/
janitor contingent upon passing of the City required
physical.
2. The second alternative would be not to hire Mr. Lukach
but to look at hiring another individual or other method
of completing the work Involved.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Park
and Street Superintendent that the City Council hire Mr. John
Lukach as outlined in alternative N1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Wv
Copy of the job description for groundskeeper/janitor. O�
S ��
JOB DESCRIPTION
GROUNDS -KEEP ER/J AN ITOR
This is an unskilled to a semi -skilled position within the Public
Works Department, City of Monticello. The grounds-keeper/janitor
is responsible for care and minor maintenance of grounds, buildings,
and equipment in various departments, City of Monticello. The
grounds-keeper/janitor will generally be attached to one specific
department for any given Period of time. The work is performed
under the supervision of a superintendent of the City of Monticello.
This is a temporary and/or seasonal position.
Duties:
The grounds-keeper/janitor sliull perform such tasks as the following:
a. Mowing and trimming of grass.
b. Trimming hedges, brush, and trees.
C. Seeding, planting, and snow and ice removal.
d. Minor repairs to fences, walkways, gates, etc.
o. Cleaning of buildings and structures including painting
where necessary.
f. Cleaning and maintenance of interior of buildings and/or
structures including minor maintenance of equipment.
g. Cleaning and minor mnintenance of motor vehicles and
equipment.
h. The grounds-keepar/janitor shall assist Clue other employees
of the City of Monticello in performance of their duties.
This assistance, however, shall be on a limited basis.
i. Ile or she shall perform other duties an required.
Desirable Qualifications:
Education: A high school graduate of: GED equivalent.
Experience:
some axpariance in grounda-keeping and janitorial work.
An individual with a knowledge of the equipment and tools needed in janitorial
and light maintenance work.
physical Demands.
Ilio applicant must bo in excellent hoalth, as soma strenuous physical labor
is at timan required along with the normal walking and lifting. Some exposure
to hazardous areas In poealblo.
Safety_,
Safety is a requirement in this position, as the varied work areas each
present apocific problems.
O
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
s. Consideration of adoptinq process governing information
submittal for variances, conditional use permits, and zoning
ordinance amendment applications. (J.0.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Attached you will find a proposed schedule or process
governing information submittals for variances, conditional
use permits, and zoning ordinance amendment applications. The
need for formalizing this process stems from problems
associated with the tardy submittal of information by
applicants to City staff, which reduces our ability to
properly review land use proposals and limits our ability to
complete the Planning Commission/City Council agenda
supplements on a timely basis. Adherence to the schedule by
applicants as proposed will allow City staff to do our job
better.
City staff requests that Council ratify this schedule, which
gives staff firm footing when we deny placement of an
application on an agenda because the information is incomplete
or late.
Please note that the policy includes the ability to override
the schedule with the approval of the Mayor and the City
Administrator, which allows a special item to be placed on the
agenda without the standard notice.
This schedule will be given to each applicant at the first
contact the applicant makes with the City.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt policy governing information submittals
for variances, conditional use permits, and zoning
ordinance amendment applications.
2. Motion to deny adoption of said policy.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the policy be adopted. Following this
policy may not always be easy, as there will be many occasions
when we will be asked to bend the rules for an applicant that
just can't quite make the deadlines. It Is possible that
strict adhoronco to this schedule will result in phone calls
and complaints to Council Members and the Mayor. At the same
time, however, the added review time that is created by this
schedule enables staff to do its job better, which will result
In loss potential for staff mistakes and oversights when doing
plan reviews.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the proposed policy statement.
6
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT
INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
DEADLINES AND DETAILS
The City of Monticello has established a process for review of
conditional use permits, zoning ordinance amendments, and variance
request applications. The schedule enables the City to achieve Its
goal of providing timely and professional review of applications.
Please review the schedule closely and schedule your activity
accordingly. Applications that fail to meet the information
requirements and timelines as noted will be continued to the next
cycle.
Any deviation from this schedule requires approval from the Mayor
and the City Administrator.
1. In order to meet public hearing notice deadlines, applications
must be submitted no later than .4430—on the second Friday of
each month. (/0J 01�- 3,—( m I-V
Application material should be of sufficient detail to allow
precise determination of variance or zoning ordinance
amendment request. Final site plan information is not
necessary on this date.
2. Final site plan information for Staff and Planning Commisslon
review shall be delivered to staff no later than A -'O on the
third Fx-J4" of each month.
3. Planning Commission public hearings are conducted at 7:30 p.m.
on the first Tuesday of each month. %-3
4. City Council considers these matters at the next regularly
scheduled meeting of the Council. Council meetings are hold
on the second and fourth Monday of each month.
PCSCHEDt4/10/90
0
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
9. Consideration of establishing a fee for special meetinqs of
the Planninq Commission and consider providing compensation to
Planninq Commission members that attend special meetinqs.
(J.O.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission requests that Council consider
establishing a special fee to be charged to all applicants
requesting a special meeting of the Planning Commission for
review of variance, conditional use permit, or zoning
ordinance amendment. The purpose of the fee is to discourage
developers from requesting special meetings and to provide
funds to cover the added cost of conducting special meetings.
In addition, the fee revenue could be used to compensate
Planning Commission members for their attendance at special
meetings.
An occasional special meeting has not been a problem for the
Planning Commission; however, in the past few years, the
frequency of the special meetings has been increasing to an
uncomfortable level. Although none of the Planning Commission
members have indicated that they have lost interest in
continuing on the Commission due to special meetings, they
have a concern that too many special meetings might discourage
continued service.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to approve establishment of a $500 fee for special
meetings of the Planning Commission and approve payment
of $50 to Planning Commission members as compensation for
attendance at special meetings of the Planning
Commission. Special meeting agenda and dates are to be
approved by the Chairman of the Planning Commission and
Assistant City Administrator.
This is the alternative recommended by the Planning
Commission. Planning Commission suggested that a $500
foe be charged for the special meetings for the following
reasons:
$500 is a sum that is significant enough to cause a
developer to hesitate prior to asking for a special
meeting.
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
B. As you may know, the Planning Commission receives a
monthly stipend of $50 for service on the
Commission. It is also proposed that Planning
Commission members receive an additional $50 for
each special meeting attended. The $500 fee could
be used to fund the additional stipend that
Planning Commission members receive when they
attend a special meeting.
C. After paying the Planning Commission from the
special meeting fee revenue, $250 of the fee would
remain in the City coffers to offset the City cost
associated with the special meeting. The amount
exceeds the City's actual cost; however, to reduce
the special meeting fee may defeat one of the
reasons for the fee, which is to discourage special
meetings.
If Council selects this alternative, information
regarding the special meeting policy could be placed in
the application process policy statement.
2. Motion to deny adoption of special meeting fee.
Council could take the position that the City should
simply reduce the number of special meetings by not
scheduling them. Under this scenario, developers would
be forced to wait until the next meeting cycle to have
their land use issue addressed.
Council could also look at holding more than one regular
meeting of the Planning Commission per month. Planning
Commission does not support this concept.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff agrees with the Planning Commission recomJnendation.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
� A
8
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
10. Consideration of authorizinq purchase of base radio for office
of Public Works Department. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
With the move to the new office of Public Works, the existing
radio at the public works shop is not easily accessible to the
supervisors. The hand-held walkle talkies, while working well
from site to site, are not able to transmit easily from one
end of town to the other; therefore, it is often necessary to
walk next door to the shop or find one of the city vehicles to
use a radio to contact one of the crew members. During the
preparation of the 1990 budget, we placed an amount of $1,600
in the shop and garage budget to buy a base radio and antenna.
We recently discussed the installation with Audio
Communications of Big Lake. This is the firm that does all of
the City's maintenance on our radios. They indicated that it
would be much cheaper for the City to purchase a mobile type
unit with an AC adapter system for our base radio, and it
would function just as well as a base unit and would allow us
some flexibility in the future. The complete unit with
installation of the antenna would cost $753, thereby saving in
excess of $800 over the budget line item.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
The first alternative is to authorize the purchase of a
Kenwood mobile/base unit and antenna for the office of
Public Works from Audio Communications of Big Lake,
Minnesota, for $753.
2. The second alternative would be not to purchase the
mobile/baso unit at this time but to continue utilizing
our existing system.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is tho recommendation of the Public Works Diroctor and
Stroet and Park Superintendent that the City authorize the
purchase of a mobilo/baso unit for the offico of Public Works
as outlined in altornativo NI at a cost of $753.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of spec shoot and quoto from Audio Communications.
9
JOB INVOICE
AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
751 ROSE DRIVE
NO.
BIG LAKE, MN 55309
PHONE OAT E.-C1y ��
161212633582 a METRO (612) 4279464
MAKE MODEL
FAX: 16121 2637811
SERIAL NO, P.O. NO.
t,
^
d�I 2 ��/�
JOB NAME
JOB LOCATION
TO:
V "((( O • /
JOB PHONE
STARTING DATE
]nEVEDATE _ CASH C.O.D.
TERMS:
_WARRANTY _ VISAWC ,
Trouble Reported end/or Special Instructions:
_CONTRACT _ CHARGE
JK %of S u!/ll lC3�Se
SSS= yCe w or '4
!M13S-/S-o /3/)5c Af—
%p„o -57 7-4 //
iT' b/o
I
6,, 19 k
/ Y- S_D /�� e 9rem /V o -�
C_- �f -m
-
TOTAL OTHER
7a
I
TIME EJ SITE O SHOP
SERVICE CALL CHARGE
PICK UP OR DELIVER
MILEAGE
pATI'. C(W'Lf.l1:U
1 �
SHIPPING& INSURANCE
� TOTAL LABOR
11CHNICIAN
TOTAL MA7 FRIA L9
- !
/D'SB�— TOTAL MATERIALS %
6lf1NA TUHC
TOTAL OTHER
(
TAX
B'enpl •Trove wprA •. b-0 Yll�leptprr
end In•1 .uulnm•nt nn been TeII rngood c—dltlon.
, e0
TOTAL
All diWete•
must be Mtil d w1min 30 devil.
' `-- 1
•V•,W,l
All I•ppr p•rler
mad nwerr•med IDI io der s.
MJ
O
KENWOOD TK-705/TK-805
Compact Synthesized FM Two -Way Radios
). ►a l.: L 11J rL, J 1 i i. r""611irl i .W: i��: r� l�i:� iil�)� 1•^i��..i•'� %� ►�l �:
The KENWOOD TK -705 VHF and TK -805 UHF compact synthesized dash -mount mobile radios are
specifically designed to deliver maximum performance and operating convenience in a design that offers
a more ultra -compact package than ever before! The inherent strength of die-cast chassis construction,
the use of only the highest quality parts and sub -assemblies, the basic design utilizing the latest
technology in solid-state electronics and microprocessors, coupled with a rigid adherence to the most
demanding quality control standards in production, assure the ultimate in product performance and
reliability. The KENWOOD TK -705 and TK -805 meet the market demands of compact mobile radios in
quality, ruggedness, and flexibility of application. The TK -705 and TK -805 carry a factory -backed
one-year warranty on parts and labor.
[Features and Benefits]
Ultra -Compact and Lightweight
Measures only 551 (140)W * 1.58 (40111 . 834 (1610
inch (rani) and weighs only 2.20 lbs (1.0 kg) lot marinrurn
IleuUilly of installation, Fils anywhere in the vehicle,
Dio-Cast Chassis Healsink Construction
The final amplthei stage of the 1 K-705 and IK -B05 is
nnounled directly on its die-cast healsvnl, lot manmum
If ermal conduction efficiency. I hgh-impacl molded (tart
panel and metal covers provide lasling beauty plus alta
protaction lot electronic chcuiby.
Synthesized 16-channal (Soni -Duple■) Capability
Synthesized channel frequency genetalion provides up to 18
semi -duplex channels Ila stale -of -all synthesved design
provides maumum flp- Nilly, and allows the dealer to acid or
change channels quickly without Ilia installation ul new PROMS,
Wideband Channel Frequency Spread
I Ile design of Ilse radio enables Illq unnsmruer and the
re[aiver to Spend 24 MI Iz on vi IF and 20 Mllr on UHF. This
tall ie allows nuPrmun) Ile,,it)rhly in system designs
involving h1uthple Channel onaahllns,
Dio-Call Chassis/Hoslaink, MIL-STD8I OC 8 D
Ruggedness
With tugged die -Cast chassisn)entsmk [onSiluCtion, Ilia
IK -705 and IK -805 nneel the sovem MIL -SID 8ICC 6 D
SpeelI1Cnt10n3 ler shock and vibialicir1,
Largo, Easy -To -Road LCD Display
A large LCD display provides clam visrhrhly in direct sunlight
ar allerdnik. It indicates operating
channels, It nFisnul, busy,
monitor and squelch,
ovr
High RF Output Power (25 watts)
25 watts or RF output power assures reliable
communications and is adjustable to any rower between
5 and 25 walls
Heavy -Duly Professional Microphone
The ruggedly built, high-quality microphone is designed with
a telephone-slyle connector and heavy-duty cable to protect
against laiture
High - Per formanco Roceive/Tianamil Design
Outstanding sensitivity, seleclivily, and reliability assure
dependable communications under the most severe
operating conditions
Built -In Timo-0u1-Timer and Busy Channel Lock -Out
Progianvnnhle luno -out -tinier and busy channel lockout
hiplove system operating efficiency, esp(:cially it, it Inige
mull -user system.
Cloning Fledbillty
Cloning they be easily accomplished by the dealer's
technician using n cloning cable t)elween two radios This
p55uics quick and [failure dealer support.
Buill-In OT Tono Coded Squelch
Built-in Ol "QUIET - TALK" continuous tone cudad squelch
system circus elumnales unwanted signals born other parties
using the sante channel, you hear only those messages
daecled to your 01 tam hequeney. A multiple Ione capability
per ehantler allows makinatm fl(! i0-1ly m channel
coordination,
Easy-lo-Oporate Pro-Sel Squelch with ON/OFF switch
Pie -set squelch with ONIDrF switch on Ilia fiord panel
provides actor Inondly operation.
Man Ouslily Snaakor
II�lY:�l��•'9YY:fl:i1Ym►F.'g - -1�IQI ��
KMC-2A
5011
Nolen Cancelling
Microphone
111.105: 150- 114 Mllt
!r"���:IOlit1:1��/_��l�l�.`fJ�l�l�ll�l_10Y
��►1•
20 dB Quieting
4 70 _,90m,.,
400Mlll 400 - 512 MI It
(GENERAL)
5011
frequency Rarngo:
111.105: 150- 114 Mllt
EIA 12 dB SINAD
I K•805: 4116- ,30M ITI 450- 470 MI17
20 dB Quieting
4 70 _,90m,.,
400Mlll 400 - 512 MI It
Nunau)r al channels:
10 ,on,' Aupler, Channa15
Channel Spacing
K-705.:)kill
Soloct.ey:
IPLI, channel slap 5 kill)
Intormoduratron:
IK -805:25 kill
Spinous and lmaga Rejection:
(PLL channel step 12.5kill)
Input Vamgo:
130 VDC negative ground
Current Drum:
0 3 A on slmxlUy 0 7 A on receive
Channel rfearip.my Spend:
00 A on hnnsmrl
Duly Cyoln:
naceiver IOU%lmnsmntar 20%
Icmlx`mtwo Range:
-30'C m 160'C 1-22.1" to 4 140'(1
Drnrerlsrm5 & Warght:
5 51 1140) W ` 1,58 (40) 11 0 34 1101) D
5011
inch lrnrn12.201bs (1,0 kg)
FCC IDICompronco
1K-105: ALIIIK.10511150-174 Will
131.. 1.5 kl It for IOU% at 10001 it
FCC Pans 22. 74 and 90
,19
I K 805: AI.I II K•805� 1 1450-470 k9111
W.—mlnm:n
AI.111 K�805 2 14 70-400 -111)
1%a1 100010
AI III K 805J UDO-512 Mlit)
:LO 0005%horn -3U'C to 160•C
AL1(( K 805.4 (400-430 MI V )
74 MI 11 UK- 7051.20 Mill 4IK 805)
I CC Parte 22.74, 90, and 05
1450-470 0,1141 modul)
KPS•t0A
DC Power Supply
The KPS IOA is a
regulated DC bower
supply designed to
provide n reliable
base slauon
01nma0n
KES'3
External Speaker
KMC'9
Baso Microphone
KLF•2
Lino Flitar
10 sllppres9
SP alleelala.hme.
25 dB ollenuatwn.
25 A
I a
(RECEIVER)
(Measuiemenls mean per CIA slandald LIA-204.Cl
Rf Input Impodance.
5011
$easnway:
EIA 12 dB SINAD
O2 AV
20 dB Quieting
03PV
Spualch So—many:
025 AV Ihrashold
MfdulOilen ACceplanco:
i7 kilt
Soloct.ey:
-80d0
Intormoduratron:
-75dB
Spinous and lmaga Rejection:
-90 dB IF K-705). -85 ISO 01( 005)
At..a fewer Output:
4 walls 01 411 loss than 5%dlstortgn
frequency $Inberly:
100005%hen) —30'C l0 180'C
Channel rfearip.my Spend:
24 MIV I1 K. 705). 70 Mi it (I K-8051
(TRANSMITTER)
(Manwamanls mean par GIA stam.,d CIA. 152 B)
RI llo.er outml:
75.0115 adluslable to 5.0116
11( Output Impadanca:
5011
Spuims and l lofmonres:
—70 dD(I K. 705),-75 dB 0K-8051
Modulolran'
131.. 1.5 kl It for IOU% at 10001 it
1 M N-10;-50
,19
Microphune..peciOnce:
W.—mlnm:n
Audio Dlsl.t*n:
1%a1 100010
(mquemy Stability.
:LO 0005%horn -3U'C to 160•C
Ch.mp,l Frequency Spread:
74 MI 11 UK- 7051.20 Mill 4IK 805)
Anplopnle MIL. -SID 8100 Mllihtrds/Prpce(lurm 8101) Mathoda/Procedures
$nock Methud 510 7 PIX00" 05 I, 2. J. 5 Method 516 3 rhocodures 1, 4, 5, 0
Vlbrolen Me ho,l 514,2 Pral:Odum 8 Method 514 3 procedure 1
Applicable onvnfnrlonhul EIA Standard
CIA 152C. 704C Shock. Vibration. 14 Wily
I
it,
KENWOOD USA. CORPORATION
COMMUNICOITIONS & TEST EOUIPMENT GROUP
PO BM 2274& 2201 East Ocmrqum St.. lung Beet, CA WWI .5745
A788 (K) 900110 U 0 Primed in Japan
Ah -
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
tt. Consideration of approving gamblinq license renewal --American
Leqion Club. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The American Legion Post /260 has submitted its gambling
license renewal application for their gambling activities at
the Legion Club. The renewal will be effective August 1,
1990, and will be automatically granted unless the City
Council serves notice t -.the Gambling Board that it does not
approve issuance of this License.
Enclosed with your agenda you will find a summary report
listing the gross revenues, prizes awarded, and charitable
contributions made by the Legion Club from their past year's
activities. There are two separate disclosures, one coverl.ng
activities the Legion Club had at the Monticello Liquor
establishment and the Legion Club, and now one with just the
American Legion Club, as they no longer have a gambling
operation at Monticello Liquor. If the Council has no
opposition to this license being renewed, no action is needed
by the Council other than acknowledgement of the license
( application.
`• D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the application; Copies of revenues and expenditures.
10
df"_:" , Department o1 Revenue - Gaming Division
Mail Station 3315
t
Far acarol Use Only
St. Paul, MN 55146.3315
F
Paid Amt.
µ` (612) 267.5300
Chock No.
Dale:
GAMBLING LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION
LICENSE NUMBER: 114"17 to] IEFF.OATE:
ontn]P'e IAMOUNT OF FEE: 1t" `
1. Applicant -Legal Name of Organization
2. Street Address
PtIPI(AN Hilo" Foil` 'I'll /N1111rNIn
11 fin tt
3. City. State, Zip
4. County
5. Business Phone
tcnt)telle NN 55162
rrlghl
( Flt 1 'lt "yd
6. Name of Chief Executive Officer
7. Business Phone
Steve lsldets
I y• ;sr. 1x 11
9. Name of Treasurer or Person Who Accounts for Revenues
0. Business Phone
tin stlktn
( Ft' 1 :7t 'FSI
10. Name of Gambling Manager
I I. Band Number
12. Business Phone
dines rifts
t14t Ford
( " ' 1 -4
13, Name of Establishment Where Gambling WIN Take Place
14. County
15. No. of Active Members
OR (felon post tF1 3cot(t-110
Ii'llkt
1ee
10. Lessor Name
17, Monthly Rent;
to
18. It Bingo will be conducted with this license. please specify days end limes of Bingo.
Days Times
I Days
Times
I Days Times
10 Has license ever been: Ll Revoked Dale,
L1 Suspended Dale, 1) Denied
Date,
20 Have internal controls been submitted proviouely?
l] Yes D No (11 'No," allach copy)
21 Has currenl tease been filed with the board?
l) Yes U No (11 'No,' allach copy)
'2 Has current sketch been filed with the board?
11 Yes to No fit 'No.' ellach copy)
GAMBLING SITE AUTHORIZATION
By my Signature below, local law enlacement offkns or agents of the Board are hereby authorized to enter upon the site, at any time, gambling Is
being conducted. to obesnla the gambling and to enforce the law for any unauthorized gems or practice.
BANK RECORDS AUTHORIZATION
By my Npnaluis below, the Board 1s hereby authorized to Inspect the bank records of the General Gambling Bank Account whenever necessary to
fullill requirements of current gambling rules and taw
OATH
I hereby doctors that:
1. 1 have read this applkallon and ani Information submitted to the Board:
2, AN Information Submitted Is true, accurate and complete;
3. AN other required Information has been fully disclosed;
4. 1 am the chief executive officer of the organization;
B. 1 assume fug responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of IN activities Id be conducted;
0. 1 will famrNarize myeell with the laws of the State of Minnesota respecting gambling and rules of the board and agree, It Nceneed, to abloe by than
Iowa and rules, including amendments thereto.
23, Official Legal Name of Organization I Signature (Chief Executive Olficar) Date I Td10
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY
I hereby acknowledge rocalpt W a copy of this applkition By acknowledging mcelpl, 1 odmN having been Served with notks that this appNci lion will
be rwiewild by the Charkable Gambllop Cordrol Dowd aro N approved by the f3ooid, will become eNeclive 00 days from the dam of retmlpt (noted
below), union a resokNlon of the local governing body 10 Passed which specifically disallows Such so" and a copy W that resoaNlon 10 received by
N Chal.1able Gambling Control Board within 60 days Of the Wkw noted data
24 CuylCoumy/Name (Local Governing Body) Township 11 eNe b located wNhln a township, please 0"010 4411111124
�E IJ.4/ r �t i.. -Yt /�L' and 25
Bgnature of Por Recelvhg ApNKnien 13. I4gnstwe of Person Receiving Application
Ale, ) / . Data Regshrod (NW dale begin e0 day pariOdl 1.110
Name of Poison Oeltverhng Application to Local Governing Body Township Name
CU*=141 NMI While Copy Board Canary--Appe;am Pink- Local Governing Body
AMERICAN LEIGION POST 0260
�
GROSS SALES
PRIZES P^|n
INTEREST EARNED
OVER/SHORT '
TOTALS
STATE TAX PAID
FEDERAL TAX PAID
TOTAL TAX PAID
TOTAL GROSS LESS TAX
EXPENSES GOODS USED ^
C0nP[wS*T\Om
ACCOUNTING, LEGAL SERVICES
ADv[AT0w6.MISC. CHARGES
^ nIwT
UTILITIES
EQUIPMENT
l`
BOND, LICENSES
�
TOTAL EXPENSES
TOTAL NET PROFIT
LAWFUL PURPOSE CONTRIBUTIONS
BUILDING EXPENSES
`
LEGION PROGRAMS. FLAGS ETC.
SCHOOL PATROL
LEGION BASEBALL `
HOSPITAL, SR. CITIZENS, NURSING HOME
FOOD SHELF, EMERGENCY AID, MEMORIALS
SCHOOL PROGRAMS
YOUTH SPORTS, PROGRAMS
MEDICAL PROGRAMS, HANDICAP AID
'
COMMUNITY GROUPS
.
SCHOLARSHIPS
^
PROPERTY TAXES
^
TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS
NET AFTER CONTRIBUTIONS
�
$3.06,343
$2,65/,6b|
$2,775
*s16]2a
$)07,67J
$|5O.5O0
$49.859
$76,723
$34,165
$o,34«
$*2VV
$1,2O|
$3.525
*/O4,695
$3.052
$3,255
$w.i>7
$5,400
$|,7OO
$8,400
$/V.7OO
$1.|36
$*,4OO
$|8.0VV
$7,237
/
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
12. Consideration of qamblinq license renewal --VFW Club. (R. W.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The VFW Club in Monticello has submitted a gambling license
renewal application for your consideration. Enclosed you will
also find a summary of the revenue and expenses pertaining to
their gambling operation from May 1989 through April 1990. If
the City Council does not have any opposition to this license
being renewed, no action is necessary by the Council, and it
will automatically be considered by the Gambling Board.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of annual summary.
M
do"4+q. Department of Revenue • Gaming Division
�i� T = Mail Statim 3315
i SI. Paul, MN 55146.3315
�?5 (612) 297.5300
For Board Use Only
Paid Amt:
Check No.
Date:
GAMBLING LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION
LICENSE NUMBER: 11-f13S7-111 I EFF. DATE: IR111119 I AMOUNT OF FEE:
I. Applicant—Legal Name of Organizaxen
2. Street Address
YTO POST Bill BOBTIC1110
5:1 Ceder St for 712
3. City, State. Zip
4. County
I
Rentllelle. Is SS362
Ilricht
B. Name of Chief Executive OIIKer
Borden Tariff
B. Name of Treasurer or Person Who Accounts for Revenues
6terle 0elthevl
10. Name of Gambling Managert
t, Bond Number
Cdvsrd lostl
t'4417s1
13. Name of Establishment Where Gambling WJ1 Take Place
t4. County
vFV Pett 6131 Rentitelle
Ilr1TAt
16. Lessor Name
IS. 11 Bingo will be Conducted with this ticonse. Please specify days and
times of Bingo.
Days Times I pays
Trmas )
IfN'lly
S. Business Phone
( 617 1 2cr•rTs?
7. Business Phone
( tl? 1 :!S -'PIS
0. Business Phone
( Bis,' )
12. Business Phone
15. No. of Active Members
-r1T
17. Monthly Rent:
to
Days. Times
19. Has license ever been: 0 Revoked Dale: N0 O Suspended Date: AJd 0 Denied Date- �rvo
20. Have internal controls Wen submitted previously? PtYes 0 No Of 'No.- attach copy)
21, Has current fate been filed with the board? 0 Yes 0 No (I1'No; attach copy)
22, IW Current sketch been filed with the board? CKYes 0 No (If Yeo; anach copy)
GAMBLING SITE AUTHORIZATION
,Ery apnalure below, local law anforcemem officers or agents of the Board are hereby authorized to enter upon the We, at any time, gambling Is
bung conducted, to observe the gambling and to enforce the law for any unauthorized game or practice.
BANK RECORDS AUTHORIZATION
By my signature below. The Board Is hereby authorized to Inspect the bank records of the General Gambling Bank Account whenever necessary to
Iutlill rapuiremems of currem gambling rules and law.
OATH
1 hereby declare Thal:
I. 1 hove read this application and all information submbtted to the Board;
2. AN information submlUed Is true, accurate and compete:
3. All other required Information las been fully disclosed:
4. 1 am IM Chief exeCutivs officer of the organitatlon;
5 1 assume Iu0 responsibility for the Iain and lawful operation of ax eclivities to be conducted;
6. 1 will familiarize myself with the laws of the $tate Of Minnesota respecting gambling and rides of [hs board and agree, if licensed, t0 ablde by [hogs
laws and rules, including amandrnems thereto,
23 Official Legal Name of Organization Signature (Chief Eeecutive Officer) Dora TitleU, W,POSr 873/ �ee.iriezija A.,/1.,. l t•7 -4o 4.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF 119TICIVIBY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY
1 hereby acknowledge recalpl 01 a loopy Of 11111 epplka110n, Dy eckrhowledgknp recalpl, 1 sdmx hevgp been weed with notice pat this appOCatbn wig
be rov4ewef3 by the Charitable Gambling CwW loard and If approved by the Boyd, will become effective BO days from me dais of receipt (road
below). unless a resoWtion of ee local govermrlg body is Passed which opeciflcasy dleallows such activity and a copy of Nat resolution is received by
the Charitable Ganeeu'g Control Board within 00 days of the below holed date
24 CirylCounty Name (Local Governing BWy) Township' ll axe Is Wiled within a towns fp, please Complete Mems 24
F YVl nvn 1 / , B t, 0 and 25'
_s7luro of Person Receiving Application: 25 Signature of Portion Recehing Appi ation
Data Realved j(tMa�,Ma begins 80 ay period) Title
ase of Person Delivering Application to Local Governing Body. Township Name
CG40o22-01(449) While Copy -061,0 Canary—Applicam Pink—Local Ooverrwlopmv
�L
SUMMARY OF MONTICELLO VFW GAMBLING LICENSES
Or
LAWFUL
GROSS
NET
STATE
EXPENSES 8
ACCUMULATED
RECEIPTS
PRIZES
RECEIPTS
TAXES
EXPENSES
DONATIONS
BALANCE
May 1989
$152,434.00
$129,751.00
$22,683.00
$2,972.00
$6,945.00
514,156.00
$53,823.00
jJuno 1989
$144,177.00
$122,588.00
$21,589.00
$2,543.44
$5,730.00
$8,998.00
$58.141.00
1July 1989
$139.901.00
$119.664.00
520,237.00
$2.121.75
$6.292.00
S14,189.00
$55,775.25
Aug 1989
$127,141.00
$108.724.00
$18,417.00
$2.555.85
$5,737.00
$16,106.00
$49,793.40
Sept 1989
$175,757.50
$150.191.00
$25.566.50
$3,941.09
$6,848.57
$16,392.04
$48.178.20
Oct 1989
$178.545.00
$151,072.00
$27,545.00
$3.415.00
$11,718.00
$20,177.06
$40,413.00
Nov 1989
$153,953.91
$130.875.00
S23.078.91
$2,373.41
$5.838.07
$10,223.75
$45,056.58
Doc1989
$t 66,079.93
$140,515.00
$25,564.93
$4,078.57
$5,297.86
$3,907.40
$57,337.68
Jan 1990
$173,787.90
$146,490.00
$27,297.90
$5,247.28
$6,996.62
$4,633.99
$67,757.69
Feb 1990
$147,200.38
$123,708.50
$23,491.88
$5.699.88
$5,599.07
$20,700.51
$59,198.11
Mar 1990
1 $151,495.16
$126,163.50
$23,331.66
$10,067.30
$7,018.93
$7,930.22
$53,513.32
Apri11990
$153,184.66
$129,558.00
$23.626.66
S12,128.71
$6,444.87
S16,307.70
$42,258.70
TOTAL
$1,863,657.44
$1,579,300.00
$282,429.44
$57,144.28
$80,465.99
S153.721.67
$42,258.70
Or
$153,721.67
9
VFW LAWFUL EXPENSES AND DONATIONS
MAY 1989 - APRIL 1990
Dept. of Minnesota VFW (Early Childhood Center Fund)
$1,000.00
Children Heart Fund
1,000.00
Muscular Dystrophy Association
500.00
Drug Program
605.00
Gun Safety Program
500.00
Scholarship Foundation b Education Grant
7,250.00
Camp Confidence
1,000.00
Monticello Summer Swim Program
1,000.00
Minnesota Special Olympics
6,000.00
Minnesota Make a Wish
1,040.00
Monticello Senior Citizen
1,500.00
Center Court Basketball Club
1,000.00
VA Hospital .
500.00
Minnesota Vietnam Vets Memorial
500.00
Monticello Junior Golf Training
1,000.00
Monticello Youth Baseball Program
5,000.00
Atoms Wrestling Club
1,000.00
Monticello Graduation Party
1,000.00
Monticello Youth Hockey
6,500.00
Monticello Rod b Gun Club
1,500.00
Monticello Lions
1,000.00
Pinewood Elementary Playground Equipment
15,000.00
National Close Up Foundation
1,796.00
VFW Cancer Endowment Fund
Alzheimers Association
500.00
400.00
Leukemia Society
1,600.00
Camp Friendship
2,000.00
Monticello -Big Lake Nursing Home
4,832.00
(TV's, paved walkway, etc.)
Youth Fishing Clinic
700.00
Multiple Sclerosis
2,085.00
Veterans on the Lake
1,000.00
VA Medical Center
1,500.00
wheelchairs - 2
2,875.20
Baseball Uniforms & Equipment, etc.
6,071.73
KMOM--Ad for High School Sports
1,440.00
Pheasants Preservation, Inc.
1,000.00
Functional Industries
1,000.00
Land of Lakes Girl Scout Council
2,565.00
Wright County Treasurer (real estate taxes)
13,400.86
Wright County State Bank (bldg. add. payment)
32,400.00
IRS (payroll 6 W/H taxes 6 other taxes due)
8,927.55
Insurance Premium
1,387.00
Repairs
1,540.00
Other (aid 6 donations to various organizations
and people)
$ 9,306.33
$153,721.67
9
L",
L
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
13. Information --The Ride Across Minnesota --Preliminary Plan.
(J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you know, the City will be playing overnight host to 1,000
cyclists on July 31, 1990. For the past few months, I have
been working with a steering committee toward development of
a plan for the day, which is attached for your review.
The steering committee has done an excellent job, and the
Chamber of Commerce is also taking on a major responsibility
by managing the food delivery. Also, the Monticello Times is
preparing and publishing much of the public information
materials advertizing the event. Please review the plan for
more detail. I look forward to hearing any comments you might
have. There is still plenty of time to make adjustments.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
TRAM 250 Plan; Steering committee membership list.
In
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
MONTICELLO TRAM 250
MAY 21, 1990
CAMPGROUND
Responsibility: Duane Gates/Monticello School District
It was determined that the recreation area adjacent to the High
School would be the site of the campground facilities. In
addition, the shower and restroom facilities located in the school
would be made available to the riders. In addition to outside
camping, an option would be provided to riders wishing to camp
inside. This option, however, might require a fee. It was felt
that the High School would be the best option because of location.
In addition, the High School proved the best option for serving
breakfast. The space in the recreation area is excellent. There
is a lot of room, and the openness available is a positive feature.
Duane Gates reported that the school showers will have sufficient
hot water for all of the riders.
I have been contacted by the firm contracted by the MS Society to
provide hot showers at $2.00 per shower. This company will not set
up shop if Monticello wants exclusive rights to the shower revenue.
The vendor noted, however, that many of the riders do appreciate
L the availability of a private shower, and the vendor also provides
us with a backup in the event the school's showers turn cold. The
committee should decide at the next meeting if we want to allow the
competition into town. Remember, we had planned on using the
shower revenue to pay for pre -trip mailings.
SANITATION
Responsibility: Jeff O'Neill, Roger Mack
City staff will work with BFI Portable Services to arrange portable
toilets in each community. Toilets will be put up in the
campgrounds to supplement the permanent facilities. In general,
City staff will be providing waste receptacles that will supplement
those waste receptacles provided by BFI. The Boy Scout Troop, as
directed by Chris Buckley, will be responsible for policing the
camping and entertainment areas for litter. The Boy Scouts will
also prepare small waste receptacles for placement in and around
the camping area.
TRAM250STATUS: 5/23/90 Page 1
V MEDICAL ASSISTANCE
Responsibility: Glenn and Caren Nemec
Glenn indicated that Hart Memorial Clinic will remain open longer
that evening to service any riders that might need minor medical
attention. Glenn has also organized an on-site medical service
which includes a nurse and emergency medical technicians or
paramedics with an ambulance.
Glenn indicated that 3-4 people are interested in providing
massages to weary riders. The steering committee indicated that a
fee of $25 should be charged those providing massages for the
opportunity to set up shop.
BIKE FIELD
Responsibility: Duane Gates
It was determined that the tennis court area is not well suited for
the bike field and that it should be located nearby in an area that
can take advantage of existing fencing. It appears that there is
a confined area near the track that has fencing on three sides that
may be well suited for the bike field area with the addition of a
snow fence on the fourth side. Chris Buckley will be organizing
and managing the bike field operation. It was determined that an
adult or deputy sheriff should be nearby to assist with policing
the camping area and bike field area.
ENTERTAINMENT
Responsibility: Duane Gates
The entertainment and food center will be located at Ellison Park.
The "Red Wolf Dixie Land Band" has been booked by Community
Education for the event. Other ideas for entertainment included
opening up the Little Mountain Settlement and providing
50 cent movie night at either the High School Auditorium or
possibly the commercial movie theater in town.
The swimming pool will be open to all riders and general public at
2:30 PM.
The Small Mouth Bass Alliance has boon contacted and has shown an
interest in providing a short fishing seminar and will be providing
other information about the Mississippi River habitat. They may
also provide a fly-fishing demonstration. This is to occur in the
late afternoon prior to the music program.
TRAM250STATUS: 5/23/90 Page 2
The Wright County Historical Society may be conducting a historical
riding tour of the city. Monticello Heartland Express will provide
the transportation. This service will be for a small fee charged
to participants. Details of this program are being worked out by
the Historical Society.
Other entertainment would include a talent show, opening up of the
racketball court, the health club, and all the other commercial
entertainment or recreational activities that are available.
HOSPITALITY AND PUBLIC RELATIONS
Responsibility: Jeff O'Neill, Bryan Swenson, Gregg Davies,
Mary Micke
It is important to really welcome the riders. Efforts should be
made to get the word out to the public that the riders will be
coming through and that the community should behave accordingly.
An information booth will be set up near the campground area. The
information booth will include a bulletin board so that messages
can be attached by the riders.
A single sheet mailing will be distributed to all riders one week
or so prior to the event for the purpose of encouraging friends and
relatives of riders to visit Monticello for the day. The mailing
will outline activities and will include a map showing the way to
town. It is proposed that the expense associated with the mailing
be financed by the City and the School District with the
possibility of the Chamber of Commerce participating. Revenue
generated from shower charges will be used to reimburse the City
and the School District. Bryan Swenson will be working on the
design of the mailing which will focus on:
1. Activity schedule/entertainment/food/et cotera
2. Robert Leathers Play structure
3. Proximity - case of access
4. General statement regarding service availability
5. River location
6. Parking location/ transportation
A printed handout will be doveloped by the Monticello Times in
cooperation with the steering committee which will outline all the
events that will be conducted in the city that day. The handout
will be provided to the riders while they are in Paynesville, which
will allow them to study the city program and determine what they
want to do the coming day. In addition, the filer would also be
included as a page in the local newspaper providing local citizens
TRAM250STATUS: 5/23/90 Pago 3
/3
with information regarding the day's events. Included in the
handout would be a map showing the location of community
facilities, including telephones, showers, laundromat, instant cash
machines, food and beverage providers, lodging, room rentals,
hotels, etc.
The Chamber of Commerce may be developing a commemorative T -Shirt
with the City LOGO on the front and TRAM 250 on the back.
INFORMATION BOOTH - Responsibility - Women of Today
The concession stand at the athletic field will be the
location of the information booth. Staffing the information
booth will be the "Women of Today" organization. This
organization will be providing at least 4 volunteers on duty
at all times during the event. Christy DeMarais will be
representing the Women of Today organization on the TRAM 250
steering committee.
Some of the items to include with the information booth would
be provisions for 1) a bulletin board; 2) additional
telephones if possible; 3) P.A. system; 4) a map; 5) small
maps and copies of the information sheet.
It appears that it will not be feasible to set up a phone
j bank; therefore, our information material should clearly show
l where public phones are located.
Power and lights.
A secondary information booth could also be set up at Ellison
Park which would need a portable phone or radio contact with
primary information booth. 2) P.A. system provided by the
band microphones.
Signage showing location of information booths and other areas
is important as well.
INFORMATION SNEET
Mary Micke will be working with the steering committee toward
development of a 4-8 page information sheet which will be
incorporated with an issue of the Monticello Times. M52
to .. — . . a .40 ft — r.. a r - .- UQUIt
• Schedules have not allowed development of the map by the
next meeting scheduled for 5/29/90. Diane Seifert, City Intern,
will be assisting with the development of the map and other aspects
of the project.
TRAM250STATUS: 5/23/90 page 4
I
FOOD AND CONCESSION
It was the general consensus of the group to work with the Chamber
of Commerce in developing a plan for providing food and concessions
to the riders. Two basic ideas were discussed. One would include
providing a community meal which would be organized by a community
group. Under this scenerio, no other community organizations would
be involved in providing the food to the riders.
The other alternative would be to organize a number of
organizations to participate individually following the "Taste of
Monticello" concept. This option may be more difficult to
coordinate; however, it could provide a more memorable experience
for the riders.
The Chamber of Commerce is now actively organizing the food service
portion of the event and has settled on the taste of "Monticello
Concept." At this time, at least Silver Fox, Monti Club, Burger
King, Comfort Inn, Monticello Country Club, Maus Foods, Pizza
Factory, and Dominoes have will be providing food services. It is
understood that the Chamber may also invite non-profit
organizations to participate in the food service program. It is
not known at this time when the taste of Minnesota event will
begin.
Breakfast will be served to the riders at the High School and will
be organized by the Chamber of Commerce.
The concession stand in the High School arena area will be open
from the time the first riders enter town --approximately 11:00 AM
until late in the evening.
It is my understanding that the Chamber of Commerce has delegated
malt beverage distribution to the Lion's Club. This item needs to
be confirmed.
SECURITY
Responsibility: Jeff O'Neill
O'Neill noted that he would work with the Wright County Sheriff's
Department to assure the safe arrival and departure of cyclists.
BIKE SHOP, BAGGAGE TRUCKS, SAG WAGONS
It was the general consensus that there is space available on the
High School grounds to accommodate these activities.
TRAM250STATUS: 5/23/90 Pago 5
(—'
COMMUNITY SHUTTLES AND COMMUNICATIONS
Responsibility: Jeff O'Neill
O'Neill noted that he would contact Hoglund Transportation
regarding this issue and that the Monticello Heartland Express
could be utilized to shuttle service for riders. It was the
general conclusion that a small fee could be charged for ridership
on the community shuttle. Details of shuttle routes, er.c., will be
defined later. It was also determined that O'Neill would work with
Hoglund Transportation in establishing a communications network
that would utilize the bus radios and telephone located on one of
the buses.
TRAM250STATUS: 5/27/90 Pago 6
TRAM 250 MAILING LIST
Greg Davies
KMOM Radio
Box 900
Monticello, MN 55362
295-1070
Candy Benoit
116 Kevin Longley Drive
Monticello, MN 55362
295-2778 (H)
Caren & Glenn Nemec
Route 2, Box 273
Big Lake, MN 55309
Bruce Gagnelius
20561 County Road 50
Big Lake, MN 55309
263-2653
Chris Buckley
521 E. 4th St.
Monticello, MN 55362
295-2181
Bryan Swenson
12 Eagle Circle
Monticello, MN 55362
295-3482 (H)
475-6051 (W)
Duane Gates
Community Education Director
School District 4882
PO Box 897
Monticello, MN 55362
295-2915 (W)
Mary Micke
Monticello Times
PO Box 548
Monticello, MN 55362
295-3131 (W)
Mary Huss/Shelly Miller
National Multiple Sclerosis
Society
MN North Star Chapter
2344 Nicollet Avenue, #280
Minneapolis, MN 55404-3381
970-1500
Me. Christy DeMarais
(Women of Today)
PO Box 12
Monticello, MN 55362
0
C
14. Information --City Enqineer review of PCA Draft Permit for
Wastewater Treatment Plant--Kiellberg West. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
This is an information item only. No action is requested.
Following is a letter sent to the PCA from the City Engineer
outlining concerns associated with the development of a
wastewater treatment facility serving the Kjellberg's West
mobile home park. This letter should result in the PCA
conducting an information meeting or formal hearing regarding
this matter.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Letter from City Engineer regarding proposed Kjellberg West
Mobile Home Park wastewater treatment facility.
13
PAY 16 .90 13*38 OSM WLS.m
Q.2
Schem
mayrron&
AS.SOdUMMC.
202t EaS+ttcnnePin n,rnuc
A71nnvar � 1S. &M 5541.1
012.13t "60
fn[.1AI•}SOu
UtyinCcts
May 16, 1990
Planlx•rs
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, MN 55155
Attn: Mr. Douglas A. Hall, Supervisor
Permits Unit, Regulatory Compliance Section
Water Quality Division
Re: STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DRAFT PERMIT # MN 0058599
Kjellberg West Mobile Home Park Wastewater Treatment Facility
Monticello, Minnesota
Gentlemen:
j Pursuant to public notice in accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7001.0110, the City
of Monticello, through me as their designated City Engineer, wishes to conunent and express
potential areas of concern regarding the referenced project and issuance of a State Disposal
System Permit for the proposed facility.
The City of Monticello's interest in this project stems from the fact that the Kjellberg West
Mobile Home Park is just west and adjacent to the Monticello city limits. See the enclosed
map received from the PCA where 1 have superimposed on it the city limits. Because of
this close proximity to the City, we are concerned that this proposed waste water treatment
facility is environmentally sound and properly designed, so as not to effect the surface and
groundwaters of the arca. The following are some of the comments and concerns expressed
by the City of Monticello.
I. The draft permit states that the proposed facility will consist of a 4.0 acre single cell
stabilization bond with an operating capacity of approximately 6.95 million gallons
and three existing seepage basins with a total area of approximately 1 acre and a
total capacity of approximately 1.5 million gallon. This facility will serve a 200 unit
mobile home park. This waste water treatment facility, as proposed, is contrary to
and not in accordance with PCA Rules and Regulations and the so called 10 State
Standards for Sewage Works of the Great takes -Upper Mississippi River Board of
State Sanitary Engineers. These standards state that as a minimum the stabilization
t pond system should consist of three cells designed to facilitate both series and
parallel operations so as to prevent any short circuiting of sewage Influent. The
HOD design loading is on the high side for a single pond.
PLAY 16 '90 13:3 OSII IIP'LS.191 F.3
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
May 16, 1990
Page 2
2. Criteria for proximity of the treatment facility to habitation does not seem to meet
minimum requirements.
3. The use of seepage ponds is highly questionable as to whether they are allowed
under PCA or 10 State Standard Guidelines. As indicated on the map, the seepage
ponds are in close proximity of wetland areas and in the gradient of groundwater
flowing northeasterly to the Mississippi River. The municipal water supply for the
City of Monticello is located in this gradient and glacial drift utilizing screened wells,
however, at depths of 200 to 300 feet.
4. Other areas of concern, regarding seepage ponds, pertains to the soil uptake rate of
the seepage ponds and the quality of effluent from the stabilization pond that will be
introduced to the seepage pond. Part II of the draft penult refers to permit effluent
limitations, but none are shown in the permit. Will the EPA Groundwater
Preventative Action Limits (PAL) requirements under the Safe Drinking Water
Standards be exceeded? Has the load -rest cycle for seepage cell regeneration been
looked into or calculated.
5. The draft permit indicates that a groundwater monitoring plan will be presented to
the PCA prior to August 1, 1990. As a minimum, the plan shall provide for the
proper installation and monitoring of three monitoring wells (one up -gradient and
two down -gradient) in the vicinity of the seepage ponds. This is certainly a necessary
monitoring plan, but groundwater and soils data should have been secured some time
ago to ascertain the before groundwater level, quality and also the soil structure in
the area. A Piezometric Map of the area should be generated to ascertain the
groundwater gradient and also the direction of groundwater flow.
6. Under the EPA Construction Grant Program, the City of Monticello in 1977
completed a Facilities Planning Report for the City as well as for the orderly
annexation Area (OAA) which includes the Kjellberg Mobile home Parks.
Subsequently the Wastewater Treatment Plant in Monticello was upgraded, utilizing
EPA and State Funding, an activated sludge plant provid'utg secondary treatment for
0.91 million. gallons per day. As population increases in the City as well as in the
OAA area, the treatment facility can be expanded to 2.4 million gallons per day at
the present site to meet population projections to the year 2030. Under
consideration presently, is a trunk sewer extension to other Kjellberg property and
the East Mobile Home Park, which is adjacent and across the highway from the West
Mobile Home Park, the subject of this permitting process Attached is Drawing No.
2 showing this proposed trunk sewer extension to the south and the subject area
0
nqY 16 '90 13:39 OSM r,PLS•h11 P,G
CMinnesota Pollution Control Agency
May 16, 1490
Page 3
In conclusion, the City of Aionticello is concerned as to the environmental impact this
proposed treatment facility will have on surface and groundwaters, in that these facilities will
be located up -gradient from the City and their public and private water supplies. With the
availability of municipal sewer service not far from the area and planned for adjacent
property, this should be further considered before a 5 year permit is granted for this
proposed wastewater treatment facility.
Respectfully Submitted,
ORR-SCHELEN•MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR THE CITY OF MONTICEL.LO
C, John P. Badalich, P.E.
City Engineer
JPB/cmw
05/90-mpca
cc: Mayor, Ken Maus, City of Monticello
John Slmola, Public Works Director
0
MAY 16 '3F1 13;40 OSti rtPtS.rci ^ • ^j• ••i
y "
iv-
/•` :I � � •Grave! Pity f ! •'��•..f. .�:f( • �.
�I n W
aside Gen+ Gravg�
St Henrys Cem;'�' i
� a• Z5 1 i
:i Gravel Pit
,I a ,,, •ti.r � , ';�.•+^•„••� o . 1 S ` �
t rir4 V� �t •1����
� r '. �� �^� � , �• _ � j 963 a1 .
{ •�,.v
t �. _ = / 14lEv
w ,. ,` sc.'a..w. A.w,Jl IfjaDl.•g wes4 "leisXani���y{sYr' .;
y." . ../ i G►l'°rj a mmae N•hry M� ".
M 0 N Ti I C E L L �;
0 0 N11� t_ Y
.......R 22 dy f
I
MAY 16 '90 1340 OSM WLS,Ml
City of Monticello
Wright County Minnesota
Sanitary Sewer Plan
® M/� a�•aot�r•r��nor
: r :••�• VNN 'S'.''�'CZ
P. 6
16 '90 13:41 0:1t HPI-S.M P.7
�_.. ..,°-`r----2�»'tW. "7 ! 1..rdl�`,G ."x..14 • r
nO
c Q ! tl s_N_ t.., iii
26 ; - - - - • - 26 �• ;1 w 1
un 0
\\\ \ �:•: • \ •. _ ir.rrr�..ri rr Exist q ForO*1a111
w� ,�► ♦c,s� ,,�� 4� i �� -�� �� - ♦ Existilntyrastrrliint,p antJ'
All
36; i �tr J1•Fi e
,�+' .•, � .�'�:,,;' • "� J �• +�+� �\ T .. it
1 .+ •�' •i• w,�., Ywu + •�r-..: •�'{.. !rte ��=SU
•axss�risrs
to
4
—.: ''. ,�I•,1�\. i +..mow: r i t+ } ( 1
'� I c i ` c
C
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
15. Consideration of adoptinq a resolution requestinq assistance
for the placement of flood elevation reference marks and
signing of 100 -Year flood mark at various locations within the
city of Monticello. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
I received a call from the St. Paul office of the Department
of Natural Resources indicating that there were some funds
available through the federal government and through the U.S.
Corps of Engineers. Money would be available to purchase and
erect elevation reference marks and signing of 100 -year mark
locations at difference places within the city of Monticello
near the Mississippi River within the flood plain zone.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the resolution requesting assistance for the
placement of flood elevation reference marks and signing
of 100 -year flood mark at various locations within the
city of Monticello.
2. Do not adopt the resolution requesting assistance.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends approval of the resolution requesting
assistance in the purchase and erection of elevation reference
marks and 100 -year flood locations.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Resolution for adoption.
14
Im
RESOLUTION 90 -
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has In effect a Flood Plain
Management Ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and
general welfare of property located in flood hazard areas within
Monticello; and
WHEREAS, the Flood Plain Management Ordinance references the Flood
Insurance Study for the City prepared by the Federal Insurance
Administration dated May 1979 and the Flood Boundary and Floodway
Map and Flood Insurance Rate Map dated November 1979; and
WHEREAS, the Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps refer to elevations
on the regional (100 -year) flood profile.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA, that funding assistance is hereby requested through the
U.S. Corps of Engineers to purchase and erect elevation reference
marks and signing of 100 -year mark locations at various locations
within the city of Monticello within the flood plain zone.
Adopted by the City Council this 29th day of May, 1990.
Rick Wolfateller
City Administrator
C
Ken Maus, Mayor
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
16. Consideration of inspection criteria and grid system for city
of Monticello sidewalks. (J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the last meeting, City staff presented a partial inspection
report for a section of sidewalk on Maple Street between 4th
Street and Broadway. With that report, the staff presented a
possible criteria and definitions to be used when inspecting
the city of Monticello sidewalk system. Rather than hold a
public hearing alone for the sidewalk system on Maple Street,
the Council ordered staff to place warning signs along the
sidewalk and notify the property owners of the unsafe
condition of the sidewalk. This has been completed.
The purpose of this meeting is to refine and select the actual
criteria and to look at a possible grid system to supplement
our existing sidewalk system. The criteria remain unchanged
from the last meeting but are enclosed again for your review.
We have enclosed with the agenda supplement a map indicating
all the existing sidewalks in the city shown in yellow, the
areas of the city rural in nature which include paved
shoulders to serve as walkways (in blue) and a possible grid
system for the innerconnection or continuation of sidewalks in
the central portions of the city shown in red.
It should be understood that sidewalk installation generally
requires the installation of curb and gutter and, of course,
the construction of the street prior to that. It should,
therefore, be noted that it may be conceivable to have a
sidewalk improvement project in the near future
innerconnecting those sections which already have curb and
gutter, but the more rural sections like Lauring Lane, Oakwood
Drive, County Road 117, and Chelsea Road should wait until
curb and gutter installation. It would bo difficult in most
aroas to build a sidewalk off the blacktop and still maintain
the rural typo of drainage with a ditch system.
The opportunity exists with the 7th Street and Minnesota
Street project to complete much of the sidewalk system along
Minnesota Street, 7th Street, and walnut Street with this
project should the Council so desire. We have received an
extremely competitive price from R.L. Larson Excavation from
St. Cloud, Minnesota, for a 4 -inch concrete sidewalk at $1.70
per square foot. This amounts to $8.50 per lineal foot of
5 -foot wide sidewalk, or $850 per 100 foot. Based upon those
prices, sidewalk could be extended along 7th Street from
Minnesota Street to Highway 25, along Minnesota Street from
7th Street to 6th Street, and along Walnut Street from the
library to the mall at an estimated construction cost slightly
over $70,000.
15
I
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
The Council could look at completing the sidewalk system in
phases and could have a requirement that new developments have
sidewalks along their collector routes (Evergreens, Sandberg
East, etc.).
One of the issues that will come up is the existence of
hazardous sidewalk in areas where no proposed sidewalk grid
exists. In these cases, the homeowner or property owner
should be given the option to repair, replace, or remove. In
addition, in those areas where sidewalk is completely outdated
and in need of major repair or replacement and is on the grid
system, there is some logic that the City should participate
in the cost of replacement, possibly at 50/50 or even the old
well -used 80/20 in the case of residential areas. It is also
possible the City could go beyond this and put in sidewalk for
free where needed and require maintenance by the property
owner. Or the City could go even one step further and have
the City maintain sidewalks in heavily traveled areas. There
are many options to consider.
After the approval of the inspection criteria and grid system,
City staff will inspect all of the existing sidewalks in the
city of Monticello (this work is already underway) and will
prepare a detailed report for review of the Council in June.
It is anticipated at that time that the Council will order
repair or replacement of such sidewalks needing so and hold a
public hearing in July.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to accept the inspection
criteria and to establish a grid system for continuation
of our existing system. In addition, the City Council
should establish a policy regarding repair, removal, or
replacement of sidewalks off the grid system, and a
possible participation for residential and non-
residential sidewalks on the grid system.
2. The second alternative would include, along with
alternative N1, the consideration of putting in a portion
of the sidewalk with the 7th Street and Minnesota Street
Improvement project based upon the above criteria.
3. Alternative 03 would include approval of the inspection
criteria and grid system with the actual policies to be
sot after review of the inspection report in Juno.
16
C
C
Council Agenda - 5/29/90
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff would wish to have as much direction as possible
regarding the existing sidewalk program in Monticello and
requests that the City Council consider alternative #I. It
should be noted that the grid system does not include sidewalk
systems in existing low -traffic, outlying subdivisions. It is
possible that in the future, with the curb and gutter
improvements to the Hillcrest area, Council could consider
including River Street west of Chestnut Street in the grid
system. Also other existing subdivisions could be considered
as well.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the criteria from the partial inspection report;
Copies of the maps showing existing sidewalk system, paved
shoulder areas, and proposed grid system.
17
CITY OF MONTICELLO
PARTIAL SIDEWALK REPORT
(West side of Maple Street from Broadway to 4th Street)
DEFINITION
A pedestrian walkway (either bituminous or concrete) is a
smooth, continuous horizontal plane generally 4 feet to 5 feet
wide, parallel to curb or street driving surface in both
boulevard width and vertical height with a cross -slope of 2%
to 4% to promote water drainage. It should be free of hazards
to pedestrians, bicyclists, and snow removal equipment such
as, but not limited to, cracks, settlements, protrusions, both
horizontal and vertical such as heaved panels (whole or
partial), tree limbs, and overhangs. There should be
pedestrian ramps where sidewalk meets curb on all new and
major restoration construction.
II. CRITERIA AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INSPECTION
A. Continuous --free of cracks other than control and
expansion joints.
Cracks classified in two groups:
1. Sealable --up to three cracks in a panel which run
parallel or perpendicular to the walking surface
less than 3/4" In width which do not intersect and
do not have panel heaving so as to cause an uneven
walking surface. These cracks may be sawcut and/or
cleaned as necessary, then sealed or caulked with
an acceptable latex or silicon concrete sealer In
such a way to make them look like an expansion
joint.
2. Unsealablo--causo for replacement
a. Wandering cracks which deviate more than 3"
from a straight line on a 4' panel and 1" on
smaller panels generated from the points of
origin at edges of panel is cause for whole or
partial panel replacement depending on the
location of crack/cracks in the panel.
b. Cracks caused by panel heave which generate a
"lip" or stop in the horizontal plane of 1/4"
or more will need repair by whole or partial
panel replacement.
SIDEWALK REPORT: 5/11/90 Pago 1
O
C.
c. A crack which causes a "crown" in the panel
will be treated in respect to the direction of
the crack.
i) A perpendicular crown of over 1" from the
ends of the panel is cause for
replacement.
ii) A parallel crown of over 1/2" from edges
of panel or in such a way that it retards
water drainage is grounds for panel
replacement.
Iii) Cracks and heaving caused by tree roots
may cause additional work to prevent
future damage to replaced panels.
d. Settlements
i) If the settlement is sufficient to trap
water causing puddling or icing of walk
or to retard proper cross -slope (toward
or away from curb based on natural
drainage) it must be replaced.
B. Overhangs and hazards
1. A hazard is considered, but not limited to,
anything which can cause personal injury from
tripping or stumbling such as a "step" in the
horizontal plane or head injuries from overhangs or
protrusion into the vertical planes of the edges of
walk. Rocks and panel chips are examples of
hazards. Trees and stumps at the very edge of
walks may be considered as potential hazards.
SIDEWALK REPORT: 5/11/90 Pago 2
Information Item: OAA REZONING REQUEST
- Howard Gilham has requested that the OAA rezone his property from
Agricultural use to Commercial use. The location of his property
is shown on the attached map. Also proposed with the rezoning is
the development of a roadway which would connect Highway 39 south
of the freeway with Highway 25.
A Planner's report has been prepared regarding this matter which is
attached for your review.
i�
tIINM II 11 Kt. l-1 NNxI I's
1 IN15WAI'I AlIC11111t. IS
llpl I ll- l 1� 1 N111 1,1 ,1' 1 1 1
111Ih!.1 111'1II It, ^.1!: till
1.1' 16• ,11111
MEIt1ORANIJUM
DATE: 4 May 1990
TO: Jelfo'.Nc:ll
FROM: John Uban
RB: Proposed Extension for Interstate 94 Ftontage Road
'111is is a prelimimoy review of the proposed extension of the frontage road on the
snuthsideof hltelrtate94west toCou,. y Road 39.
1. lh,i IFl-it ta „c malI ettension is desigtuded in IIIc Comprehensive flan incluJing a
tv„ Ipleut frox:,gn 1c•ad system between t'ornty Road 118 and County Road 31) till
Ixtth sides at the Inlerstate Highway.
2. With the completion of 701 Street in the near future and the proposed frontage
roaJ extension on the south side, a looped frontage road system between 11 iLhttay
25 and County Road 39 would be completed. '11tis will promote additional
commercial traffic in the area and provide new opportunities for development
along 1-9.3,
?, \fuah of till- traffic using County Road 39, which serves the western rural areae
of Wright County, has to cross 1.94 and connect up to Highway 25 through the
Downtown prntion of Monticello. With the proposed frontage, road linkage en the
meth aids, .,,ref, of til .t truffle eoutd 6culatu t'-1, I liginvay 25 an the Muth cepa
Ail the Inter tate. This will help promote business activities in the area and
enhances vchirular circulation in this part of town. The looping of the frontage
road system i i an intpol Cant element in providing appropriate infrastructure to
sine expandtd nruwth in the Monticello area.
4. 'Ihe Complellensive Plan calls for commercial development along the Intel,t:lle in
this rote,,, -Installing} the frontage road at this time would encourage commercial
if, t clopnv'n!, onitment withi lie Comprehensive Plan. Types of commercial would
%airydrl•ending till lie standard%used I'm development. Ant icipateddevelopnu'nl
would ptis6bly Its industrial or service oriented rather than convenience retail
Jeff O'Neill, 4 May 1990 Page 2
because access to the Interstate is about three-quarters of a mile away. Good
visibility would not be enough to attract the convenience -oriented motorist back
along the frontage road for three-quarters of a mile.
There may he some limited amount of industrial uses with outside storage•
building supply, or similar uses. Based on these kinds of uses, it would be
appropriate to apply some performance standards to control the types of
development in the arca and to maintain a pleasant aesthetic appearance along
the Interstate.
llte Comprehensive Man polity is that the highway oriented uses along 1-94 should
be concentrated and not spread out. Sparse development patterns can waste the
prime commerrEl landwherein market •0-..nmt;vn is critical •n evnandine
development.
5 Should the area served by the proposed frontage road be left in the township• the
lots will have to be large enough to have an on-site sewer system. I would
recommend at least 50 percent of a lot be open space for the drain I field to
serve the individual sanitary sewer. Perhaps a ten -acre lot minimum would be
appropriate for this arca if left un -annexed into the City.
(i. sanitary sewer is pioposed to he extended into Ihis Inca some time in Ihr future
Th._ development character %vo•.ild then rhangc lo;analler lots and nivic intea•.r
us_a "i•asetl un City rurn'ices. H•ith r'ity srn•i:cs, nl course, coma the, ac^d fur
annexation. Should an inicrittt solution be Sought, performance slandatds 0iould In•
ayree,l to for the properly served h) the frontage road. The following is a list
ul' bpeciGc areas That could he included if such un approach were (aken
-
a) landsc.•tpe standards as developed in the City Ordinance;
b) Sign controls dissallowing any billboards or product advert icing signs;
e) Site standards such as par king requirement setbacks, lighting, pavemen,,
drainage, etc.;
d) Architectural controls to eliminate metal buildings of a low-qu:diq nature,
pole barns, etc. so that the area is not a development 'free-for-all": and
e) Provisions for ulililies and platting for future City services.
'Ibis agreement could Ip; rc:Irhed betvern the lily and the OAA Board in some
fashion to hind the land owners/developers to these development standards.
7. The OAA, in order to implement these, standards, shnuld amend their MA plan;
to include a specific lord use designation on the affected properties, which will
then refer to the performance standards. This plan should also work out utility
phasing, drainage, septic systems, etc. and a future date of anncxalion haled
either on time or extension of utilities,
8. Should this rand remain in the township with less stringent amtrols th.tn the l'iry
of Monticello and with Irsa assesamentx on the property for future uolitit-, then
the arta might have a competitive advantage over other land altcady in the City
served trysewer and water. 'Ike standrrds and future asxemments and other costs
need In be prearranged and determined ser that this area dour not have an overtly
( Jeff O'Neill, 4 May 1990 Page 3
unfair competitive position. Should this land be available at a noticeably lower
price and considering it would have visibility to the Interstate, there could be an
impact of softening the market for the Monticello Industrial Park in favor of less
expensive land. The banking of future assessment fees and other methods might
be derived to more fairly equalize the economic positions of the newly served
properties with other properties in the area.
Should the area be annexed into the City of Monticello prior to development, then
there would not be an issue of land value or competition based on an unfair
advantage because all utilities and ordinance requirements would have to be met.
To the degree that this can be equalized is a critical element to allow the area
to remain in the OAA with future annexation into the City of Monticello.
X
7-10 1 Jrs And'1
• ` a4 Existing g ��. rnrururu Proposed RoadZ
-----Sewer 18
17-1
Re: -Zone Proposed �` ° '••r�!�r1rr; _ '
t
•••+, `•�'` �' .yam. `..,moi y � �
Infill 16
C(NELSEAF i•4 +•••••+• �'w-_2... GSA"
15 DUNDA Q -'Naas :• .: •+,• + ... •. ! —
+\ ,-a a a.a ...... ......
Annexation Sty: , �.;: •�,, .+ 8 lVa..T.t `
. a;= `�• •-auurruarrnr uanrnursr�a) • �--�«" _ ^ � .
' City of Montice, c 14. . •12
; ;.fi" t
w,ight County it �,'- — a..,,i:�{ ;r . •',
Lo er Rang owth ;.,.;? •., ..L:,.
PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION,13.E
.....a
SYSTEM 3 GROWTH AREAS ...... S` ,,� 1'
cm 106
! t v +• { T
, M+� oar Icrr.ar r••.aGr � •�,,.f •' � "�' ;7i-•
art artOCafrr !.0
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/25/90 09:53:31
Ci
H, CATs VENDOR VENDOR NAME
DETAIL DESCR
29658 04/27/90 185 SA:.ZWEOEL/PATTY
Oisbursem?nt HistOry 4?port
CHECK RESISTER - GENERAL
AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICi.
PROTECT
179.42
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
933.62
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
891.15
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
278.58CR
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
616.07
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
158.03
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
158.03
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
90.26CR
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
689.82
29659
04/27/90
174
PPINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
158.03
C49659
PRINCIPAL
04/27/90
174
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
35.11
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
381.95
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
1.078.37
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
10.52
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
194.01
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
336.14
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
89.03
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
80.03
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
7.01
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
560.46
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
305.56
29659
04/27/90
174
PRINCIPAL
MUTUAL
LIFE
IN
58.67
J
6.383.77 •CHECK. TOT,U.
29660
04/?7/90
37
COMMISSIONER
OF
REVENUE
260.75
v
1
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/25/90 09:58:31
CHECK# DATE VENDOR VENDOR NAME
DETAIL DESCR
29661 04/27/90 160 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC. I
29661 04/27/90 160 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC. I
29662
04/27/90
133
ROAD RESCUE. INC.
29663
04/27/90
197
STAR & TRIBUNE
29664
04/27/90
51
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWAR
29665
04/27/90
97
KOROPCHAK/OLIVE
29665
04/27/90
97
KOROPCHAK/OLIVE
29666
04/27/90
131
MOBIL
29666
04/27/90
131
MOBIL
29666
04/27/90
131
MOBIL
29666
04/27/90
131
MOBIL
29667
04/27/90
158
O.E.I. BUSINESS FORMS
29668
04/27/90
56
FEEORITE CONTROLS. INC.
29669
04/27/90
11
ANDERSON/GARY
29669
04/27/90
11
ANDERSON/GARY
29670 04/27/80 133 MONTICELLO CHAMBER OF CO
29671 04/27/90 247 COMPUFORMS. INC.
Disbursement History Report,
CHECK REGISTER - GENERA'
AMOUNT CLAIM INVOIC:
PROJECT
462.89
174.91
637.80
89.60
532.00
20.00
11.25
10.00
21.25
100.93
5.00
23.51
23.52
152.96
139.53
1.271.95
120.00
117.85
237.85
20.00
273.36
'CHECK TOTAL
•CHECK TOTA
i
*CHECK TOTAL
•CHECK TOTAL
J
BPC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/25/90
09:58:31
Oi•s5ursiment History
R?oor?
1,
REGISTER
- GENERAL
cCHEF-K.
CK=
DATE
VENDOR
VENDOR NAME
AMOLIN1
CLAIM INV0;_[
DETAIL OE;CR
PROJECT
29671
04/27/90
247
COMPUFORMS. INC.
273.36
546.72
■CHECK TOTAL
29672
04/27/90
113
MID CENTRAL. INC.
847.83
29673
04/27/90
250
WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
107.50
29674
04/27/90
.90029
SIMPSON/MARC
236.00
29675
04/27/90
249
IBM CORPORATION
16.087.24
29676
04/27/90
248
CITY OF SAINT PAUL/THE
572.05
29677
04/27/90
.90030
WOODWARD/JOANNE
50.79
�J
29678
04/27/90
0
AMERI DATA
284.00
29679
04/27/90
118
MN DEPART OF NATURAL
RES
711.00
29680
04/27/90
198
STATE CAPITOL CREDIT
UNI
30.04
29681
04/27/90
257
KNUTSON INC/RICHARD
10.103.96
29681
04/27/90
257
KNUTSON INC/RICHARO
15.890.03
25.993.99
*CHECK TOTAL
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
BANK
2.274.23
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
BANK
1.683.03
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
BANK
12.24
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
BANK
9.34
9082
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
BANN
311.16
C�
D
P.f:C FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/25/90 09:58:31
CHECK# DATE VENDOR VENDOR. NAME
DETAIL DESCR
Disbursement History R.!Dor-
CHECK REGISTER - GENER.
AMOU:JT CLAM INVOICt
PPOJECT
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
83.84
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
151.25
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
42.25
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
0.25
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
50.27
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
3.65
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
132.48
29682
04/27/90
2?2
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
42.25
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
9.38
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
119.71
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
181.40
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
57.39
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
225.09
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
42.23
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
42.23
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
9.06
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
131.33
29682
04/27/90
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
34.28
29682
04/27/00
222
WRIGHT
COUNTY
STATE
BANK
18.33
5.666.57
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES RETIRE
817.70
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES RETIRE
90.43
29083
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES RETIRE
49.10
29883
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES RETIRE
88.57
i—)
*CHECK TOTAL
.i
J
91
RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/25/90
09:58:31
Oisoursemant History
Reoort
CHECK REGISTER
- GENERAL
`f _'
�FtECK;t
DATE
VENDOR
VENDOR
NAME
AMOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE
DETAIL
DESCR
PROJECT
2968:
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
PETIPE
24.74
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
29.44
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
77.58
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
24.74
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
5.50
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
70.10
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
106.24
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
33.61
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
131.81
29683
04/27/90
178
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
24.73
3683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
24.73
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
5.30
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
39.69
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIE
20.08
29683
04/27/90
176
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RETIRE
10.73
1.633.90
*CHECK TOTAL
29684
04/27/90
36
COMMISSIONER OF
REVENUE
1.787.95
29685
04/21/90
88
I.C.M.A.
RETIREMENT
TRUS
500.93
29685
04/27/90
88
I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT
TRUS
182.04
682.97
"CHECK TOTAL
29686
04/27/90
800000
VOID CHECKS
VOID CHECKS
9687
04/27/90
118
MN DEPART
OF NATURAL
RES
3-76.00
29688
04/27/90
224
Y.M.C.A.
OF MINNEAPOLIS
625.00
RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/25/90 09:58:31
CHECKS
DATE
VENDOR
VENDOR NAME
& ASSOCIATES/EA
29694
04/27/90
DETAIL DESCR
29689
04/27/90
197
STAR & TRIBUNE
29690
04/27/90
54
ENNIS CABINETS/JIM
29691
04/27/90
38
COMMUNICATION AUDITORS
29691
04/27/90
38
COMMUNICATION AUDITORS
29692 04/27/90 .90031 HAZARD CONTROL. INC.
29693 04/27/90 260 AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO
29694
04/27/90
10
ANDERSON
& ASSOCIATES/EA
29694
04/27/90
10
ANDERSON
& ASSOCIATES/EA
29694
04/27/90
10
ANDERSON
& ASSOCIATES/EA
29694
04/27/90
10
ANDERSON
& ASSOCIATES/EA
29695
04/27/90
114
MIDWAY INDUTRIAL SUPPLY
29696
04/27/90
173
PREUSSE'S CLEANING SERVI
29698
04/27/90
173
PREUSSE'S CLEANING SERVI
29697
04/27/90
199
STENCEL/PEGGY
29698
04/27/90
81
HERMES/JERRY
29690
04/27/90
165
PETERSEN'S MONT FORD -MER
29699
04/27/90
165
PETERSEN'S MONT FORD -MER
Disbursement History Report
CHECK REGISTER - GENERA ,
AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE
PROJECT
570.00
1.545.00
29.84
292.33
322.17
1.350.00
5.242.00
118.53
1.338.00
29.20
1.649.49
3.135.22
47.07
400.00
50.00
450.00
815.00
227.50
103.35
47.70
151.05
*CHECK TOTAL
r J
•CHECK TOTAL
*CHECK TOTAL
J
•CHECK TOTAL
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
055/25/90 09:58:31
CECKil
DATE VCNOOR VENDOR NAME
DETAIL DESCR
29700 04/27/90 95 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE
29701 04/27/90 162 ORR-SChcLEN-MAYEP0N &. AS
29701 04/27/90 162 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & AS
29701 04/27/90 162 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & AS
29701 04/27/90 162 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & AS
29702
04/27/90
258
MOORES EXCAVATING
29703
04/27/90
259
BRAUN ENGINEERING
29704
04/27/90
4
ADOPT -A -PET
29705
04/27/00
185
SALZWEDEL/PATTY
29706
04/30/90
97
KOROPCHAK/OLIVE
RECORDING FEES/MARTIE'S
29707
04/30/90
31
CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPAN
29708
04/30/90
26
BUSINESS OEVELOPMF.NT SER
1 29708
04/30/90
2B
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SER
29708
04/30/90
26
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SER
29709 04/30/00 .90032 RISING/MICHAEL
29710 04/30/90 .90033 DAHLGREN/IVY
9711 04/30/00 .90034 MERT2/TOM
DisDurseme nt History Reoort
CHECK REGISTER- GENERAL
AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE
PROJECT
8j.1.3
7.093.65
7.745.58
3.423.26
1.475.77
19.738. 2'u
600.00
1.424.00
310.00
469.00
38.30
134.90
4.700.00
4.70V.00
4.700.00
14.100.00
75.00
50.00
50.00
*CHECK TOTAL
$CHECK TOTAL
3
7
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/25/90 09:58:31
CHECK# DATE VENDOR VENDOR NAME
DETAIL DESCR
29712 04/30/90 .90035 OGRAM/ROBERT & AMY
29713 04/30/90 98 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI
29714 04/30/90 86 HOLMES & GRAVEN
29714 04/30/90 66 HOLMES & GRAVEN
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement History Reoort,
CHECK REGISTER - GENERt
AMOUNT CLAIM INVOIC`
PROJECT
25.00
155.00
216.00
4.479.00
4.695.00 •CHECK TOTAL
8122.049.33 i
J
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLG
05/25/90 08:53 Check Reai5ter- GENERAL GL540R-VO4.06 PAGE 1
C. NK VENDOR CHECKS DATE AMOUNT
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
000072
GOVERNMENT TRAINING CENT
29715
05/09/90
15.00
000210
U.S. POSTMASTER
29716
05/09/90
500.00
000262
STATE TREASURER
29717
05/09/90
122.25
000254
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
29718
05/09/90
30.00
000254
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
29719
05/09/90
189.80
000264
LINCOLN COMPANIES/THE
29720
05/09/90
2.500.00
000118
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES
29721
05/09/90
418.00
000042
CORROW SANITATION
29722
05/09/90
12.116.67
000235
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
29723
05/09/90
150.00
000127
MINN POLLUTION CONTROL A
29724
05/09/90
170.00
000008
AME READY MIX
?9725
05/13/90
$2.25
000014
ANOKA COUNTY SOCIAL SERV
29726
05/13/90
2:7.54
.90036
BARTHEL/JERRY
29727
05/13/90
47.50
000024
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONE CO
29728
05/13/90
7.046.80
.90037
CONSTRUCTION 70. INC.
29729
05/13/90
2.335.10
000047
DECISION DATA SERVICE IN
29730
05/13/90
226.?4
000084
HOGLUND TRANSPORTATION
29731
05/13/90
4.274.76
000088
I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUS
29732
05/13/90
682.97
000243
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS
29733
05/13/90
25.00
000115
MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
29734
05/13/90
636.57
000130
MINNESOTA U.C. FUND
29735
05/13/90
391.80
C000155
NORWEST INVESTMENT SEP.VI
29736
a5/13/90
2.407.61
,}
000170
POLKA DOT RECYCLING
29737
05/13/90
1.187.17
000175
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GR
29736
05/13/90
27.005.83
000176
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE
29739
05/13/90
1.681.05
000269
SHELTON COMPANY
29740
05/13/90
270.00
000198
STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI
29741
05/13/90
30.04
000262
STATE TREASURER
29742
05/•13/90
2.60
000217
WOLFSTELLER/RICHARD
29743
05/13/90
300.00
000219
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR/TR
28744
05/13/90
2.047.05
000222
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
29745
05/13/90
5.296.54
GENERAL CHECKING
72.379.14 -,r- -
RRC FINANCIAL
SYSTEM
CITY OF MONTICELLO
05/25/90 08:55
Check Reoist=r
- GENERAL
GL540R-VO4.06 PILGF
BANK
VENOOR
CHEC✓.X
DATE
AMOUNT
GENL GENERAL
CHECKING
000160
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC. I
29345
05/16/90
0.00
000118
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES
29746
05/16/90
736.00
000185
SALZWEDEL/PATTY
29747
05/16/90
485.00
000231
DARLEY & CO./W. S.
29748
05/16/90
7.85
.90039
JENSEN/DAN
29749
05/16/90
533.32
000072
GOVERNMENT TRAINING CENT
29750
05/1G/90
65.00
.99040
STROMBERG/DAVID
29751
05/16/90
25.00
000098
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI
29752
05/16/90
?5.00
000148
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
29753
05/16/90
8.259.77
000118
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES
29754
05/16/90
809.00
000174
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN
29755
05/21/90
6.534.48
000072
GOVERNMENT TRAINING CENT
29756
05/21/90
65.00
000135
MONTICELLO FIRE OEPARTME
29757
05/21/90
2.662.70
000118
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES
29758
05/21/90
394.00
000015
A T & T INFO SYSTEMS
29759
05/23/90
3.96
000003
ADAM'S PEST CONTROL
29760
05/23/90
50.00
000010
ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES/EA
29161
05/23/90
147.73
000270
AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO.
29762
05/23/90
4.792.00
000020
BEN FRANKLIN
29763
05/23/90
63.45
000266
RIOCYCLE
29764
05/23/90
42.00
000026
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SER
29765
05/23/90
1.516.25
000027
BUSINESS RECOPOS CORPORA
29766
05/23/90
401.08
000030
CENTRAL MCGOWAN. INC.
29767
05/23/90
37.85
000275
CENTURY LASS
29768
05/23/00
261.94
000031
CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPAN
29769
05/23/90
136.80
000035
COAST TO COAST
29770
05/23/90
611.64
000036
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
29771
05/23/90
1.835.04
000040
CONWAY TRUCK & EQUIPMENT
29772
05/23/80
755.00
000041
COPY DUPLCATING PRODUCTS
29773
05/23/90
267.80
000045
OAHLGREN/SHAROLOW AND UB
29774
05/23/90
3.213.57
.90042
OEHMER/TERRY
29775
05/23/90
135.15
000040
DUERR'S WATER CARE SERVI
29776
05/23/90
27.65
000050
DYNA SYSTEMS
29777
05/23/90
257.02
.80038
FARNAM/TED
29778
05/23/90
249.95
000080
FLICKER'S T.V. & APPLIAN
29779
05/23/00
24.95
000081
FOSTER-FRAN2EN-CARLSON A
29780
03/23/90
50.00
000280
FYLES EXCAVATING & HONEY
29781
05/23/90
3.252.00
000064
GENERAL RENTAL CENTER
29782
05/23/90
87.59
000069
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. I
29783
05/23/90
70.00
000277
GREEN SIDE UP LAWN & TRE
29784
05/23/90
159.72
000073
GRIEFNOW SHEET METAL
29705
05/23/90
250.00
000078
HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
29788
05/23/90
208.88
000081
HERMES/JERRY
29787
05/23/90
227.50
000082
HOGLUND BUS COMPANY
29788
05/23/90
1.57
000085
HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE
?9789
05/23/90
87.57
000088
I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUS
29790
05/23/90
582.97
000090
INT UNION OF OPERAT ENGI
29791
05/23/90
72.00
j
000095
J M OIL COMPANY
29792
05/23/90
230.31
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELL;-
05/25/90 08:55 Chec+ Resister- GENERAL GL540R-VO4.06 PAGE:
CNK VENDOR CHECK#, DATE AMOUNT
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
000097
KOROPCHAK/OLIVE
29793
05/23/90
5.00
000265
M & P TRANSPORT, INC.
29794
05/23/90
12.72
000104
MACOUEEN EQUIPMENT INC.
29795
05/23/90
287.87
000106
MARCO BUSINESS PPOOUCTS.
29796
05/23/90
293.15
000107
MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE
29797
05/23/90
14.75
000109
MAUS FOODS
2979£
05/23/90
41.58
000114
MIDWAY INOUTPIAL SUPPLY
?9799
05/23/90
41.68
000279
MIDWEST VISION OISTRIBUT
29800
05/23/90
'=.50
000 127
MINN POLLUTION CONTROL A
?9£01
05/23/90
4?.00
000131
MOBIL
2980?
05/23/90
2?1.78
000136
MO,:TICELLO OFFICE PRODUC
?9803
125/23/90
58'.85
000137
MONTICELLO PRINTING
29804
05/23/90
674.45
000140
MONTICELLO TIMES
29805
05/23/90
2.201.93
000144
NATIONAL BUSHING PARTS &
29806
05/23/90
46.65
000278
NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
29807
05/23/90
75.00
000146
NELSON OIL COMPANY
29£08
05/23/90
25.62
000147
NORTHERN OXYGEN SERVICE.
29809
05/23/90
13.50
000158
O.E.I. BUSINESS FORMS
29810
05/23/90
70.70
000263
O'CONNOR/MICHAEL W.
29911
05/23/90
9?5.00
000160
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC. I
29812
05/23/90
12.881.38
000162
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & AS
29813
05/23/00
6.456.44
t 000271
P & H WAREHOUSE SALES. I
29814
05/23/90
189.30
000164
PARK EOUPMENT COMPANY
29815
05/23/90
97.95
000272
PLANT & FLANGED EOUIPMEN
29816
05/23/90
13.00
000251
PLUMBERY-PURCELL'S PLBG
29817
0:/23/90
345.55
000173
PREUSSE'S CLEANING SERVI
29818
05/23/90
450.00
000176
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE
29819
05/23/90
1.709.53
000179
RELIABLE CORPORATION/THE
29620
05/23/90
132.66
000181
RENNER & SONS INC./E. H.
29£21
05/23/90
410.00
000267
RESCUE MAGA2INE
29872
05/23/90
23.95
000268
RUFF AUTO PARTS
29823
05/23/90
20.00
000184
SAFETY-KLEEN CORP.
29824
05/23/90
61.00
000229
SCHARBER & SONS. INC.
29825
05/23/90
15.75
000186
SCHERER SANITATION
29826
05/23/90
31.00
000188
SENTRY SYSTEMS
29877
05/',3/90
126.00
000281
SHARE CORPORATION
29£?8
05/23/90
291.13
000191
SHUMAN/CATHY
29879
05/23/90
3?.00
000103
SIMONSON LUMBER COMPANY
29£30
05/23/90
75.90
000194
SMITH & HAVES
29831
05/23/90
3.013.51-
.013.54000273
000273
SNYDER DRUG
29832
05/23/00
31.98
000197
STAR TRIBUNE
29033
05/23/00
255.00
000198
STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI
29834
05/23/90
30.04
000199
STENCEL/PEGGY
29835
05/23/90
475.00
000203
TAYLOR LAND SURVEYORS IN
29836
05/23/90
63.00
000211
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
29037
05/23/90
110.13
000213
UNOCAL
29838
05/23/00
109.45
.90041
VISU-SEWER CLEAN & SEAL
29839
05/23/90
255.00
.90043
WALLEN/MARK
29840
05/23/90
339.80
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/25/90 08:55 Check Resister - GENERAL
BANK VENOOR C.HECKt DATE
GENL GENEsAL CHECKING
000219 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TR
000275 WRIGHT COUNTY GEPT OF HI
000222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
000224 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPOLIS
000223 YONAK LANDFILL. INC.
000081 HERMES/•JERRY
GENERAL CHECKING
GRAND TOTAL ALL CHECKS (29658 to 29846)
CITY OF MONT[CELL-
GL540R-VO4.06 PAGE 3
AMOUNT J
29841 05/23/90
29842 05/23/90
29843 05/23/90
29844 05/23/90
29845 05/23/90
29846 05/16/90
12.551.21
2.463.50
5.939.70
625.00
4.920.48
227.50
101.729.82
$296.155.29
c�
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
0.5/25/90 09:50:57
i
'CHECK# DATE VENDOR VENDOR NAME
DETAIL OESCR
15063 04/30/90 800038 PP.INCIPAI- MUTIIA1, I.TFF IN
15063 04/30/90 800038 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN
15064 04/30/90 800015 FOSTER/FRANZEN/CARLSON A
AUDIT FEES
15065 04/30/90 800040 QUALITY NINE & SPIRITS C
15066 04/30/90 800040 QUALITY MINE & SPIRITS C
15066 04/30/90 800040 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C
15067 04/30/90 800016 GRIGGS. COOPER.' & COMPANY
x.5008 04/30/90 800022 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L
15069 04/30/90 800037 PHILLIPS & SONS CO/ED
15069 04/30/90 800037 PHILLIPS & SONS CO/EO
15070 04/30/90 800039 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE
15070 04/30/90 800039 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE
15071 04/30/90 600005 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
15072 04/30/90 600052 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
15072 04/30/90 600052 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
15072 04/30/90 600052 WRIGHT CO!INTY STATE BANK
5072 04/30/90 000052 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
OisOursemeit History Reoort
CHECK REGISTER - LIOUOR
AMOUNT CLAIM INVO?:.
PROJECT
108.60
718.75
827.35
494.00
*CHECK TOIAL
2.061.32
315.22
465.02
780.24 *CHECK TOTAL
2.460.40
151.50
520.26
294.93
815.19
111.05
117.61
228.56
226.89
245.52
700.e4
3.75
200.04
'CHECK TOTAL
*CHECK TOTAL
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/25/90 09:50:57 Disbursement History R?oort.
CHECK REGISTER - LIOUOR
CHECK# DATE VENDOR VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE
DETAIL DESCR PROJECT
15072 04/30/90 800052 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE PiA::K 3.75
654.80 •CHECK TOTAL
15073 04/30/90 800044 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI 250.00
15074 04/30/90 800012 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 35.72
15075
04/30/90
800022
JO,•HNSON
BROS
WHOLESALE L
937.38
15075
04/30/90
800022
JOHNSON
BROS
WHOLESALE L
1.243.49
2.180.67
•CHECK TOTAL
15076
04/30/90
800040
DUALITY
WINE
& SPIRITS C
1.214.46
15076
04/30/90
800040
QUALITY
WINE
& SPIRITS C
269.00
1.483.46
•CHECK TOTj
15077
04/30/90
600022
JOHNSON
BROS
WHOLESALE L
338.51
15077
04/30/90
800022
JOHNSON
BROS
WHOLESALE L
972.97
1,311.48
•CHECK TOTAL
15078
04/30/90
800018
GRIGGS.
COOPER & COMPANY
2.389.85
15079 04/30/90 800012 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 370.94
15079 04/30/90 800012 EAGLE. WINE COMPANY 18.59
389.53 •CHECK TOTAL
LIQUOR FUND $17.241.25 •*•
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY Of MrNTICELLt-
0'5/25/90 08:50 Cheek R?gist?r_ LIQUOR GL540R-VO4.06 PDGF i
p/
II NK VENO'JR CHECKS OA TE AMOUNT
L IQR L IOUOP FUND
800007
TQAVELERS DIRECTORY SERV
15080
05/04/90
161.00
800001
BEQNTCK'S PEPSI COLA COM
15081
05/11/90
303.70
800004
COAST TO COAST
15082
05/11/90
4.68
800006
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
15083
05/11/90
7.195.11
800008
CTI SERVICES
15084
05/11/90
100.00
800009
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
15085
05/11/90
18.257.95
800010
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
15086
05/11/90
406.75
800011
DICK BEVERAGE COMPANY
15087
05/11/90
?.025.65
800012
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
15088
05/ii/90
62.02
800059
GLASS HUT/THE
15089
05/11/90
36.00
800018
GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY
15090
05/11/90
2.761.77
600019
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
15091
05/11/90
12.4 3.30
800022
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L
15092
05/11/90
2.776.34
800021
JUDE CANDY & TOBACCO COM
15093
05/11/90
466.49
800023
KOLLES SANITATION
15094
05/11/90
192.60
800024
KRWC RADIO STATION
15095
05/11/90
96.00
800026
L "N" R SERVICES
15096
05/11/90
25.00
800025
LIEFERT TRUCKING
15097
05/11/90
480.54
800027
MAUS FOODS
15098
05/11/90
10.43
800028
MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
15099
05/11/90
53.89
800031
MONTICELLO OFFICE PfOOUC
15100
05/11/90
2.99
800032
MONTICELLO TIMES
15101
05/11/90
152.40
1 800037
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/EO
15102
05/11/90
969.20
800040
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C
15103
05/11/90
862.35
800041
RON'S ICE COMPANY
15104
05/11/90
347.42
800043
SEVEN-UP BOTTLING COMPAN
15105
05/11/90
39.50
800045
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUP
15106
05/11/90
128.65
800048
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
15107
05/11/90
9.430.05
800051
VIKING COCA-COLA BOTTLIN
15108
05/11/90
236.35
800053
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
15109
05/11/90
11.90
t
LIOUOR FUND 60.150.08
b
** a
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
CITY OF MONTICELLO
05/25/90 08:52 Check
Register - LIQUOR GL54OR-VO4.06 PAGE
BANK
VENOOR
CHECKU
DATE
AMOUNT
LIOR LIQUOR
FUND
800002
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONE CO
15110
05/12/90
97.56
800018
GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY
151 1 1
05/12/90
1.715.39
800035
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
15112
os/1?j90
613.00
800039
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE
15113
05/12/90
235.85
800044
STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI
15114
05/12/90
250.00
800052
WPIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
15115
05/12/90
653.91
LIQUOR
FUND
3.555.61
E
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
CITY OF MONTICELLO
05/25/90 08:52 Check
Register — LIQUOR GL540R-VO4.06 PAGE 1
CJK
VENDOR
CHECK#
DATE
AMOUNT
LIOR LIQUOR
FUND
800020
GRUYS. JOHNSON & ASSOCIA
14931
05/15/90
165.0008
800062
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL/TOB/FI
15116
05/15/90
250.00
800037
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/EO
15117
05/15/90
4.465.62
800018
GRIGG$. COOPER F. COMPANY
15118
05/15/90
2.455.57
800054
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
15119
05/15/90
40.25
800060
KMOM RADIO STATION
15120
05/15/90
110.00
800012
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
15121
05/15/90
26.46
800022
JOHNSON EROS WHOLESALE L
151?2
05/15/90
1.04?.10
800038
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN
15123
05/70/90
8?7.35
800064
BUSINESS RECORDS COPPORA
15124
05/23/90
133.90
800005
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
151?5
05/23/90
?33.14
800018
GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY
15126
05/23/90
97.43
800065
MCOOWALL COMPANY
15127
05/23/90
72.30
800050
MONTICELLO VACUUM CENTER
15128
05/23/90
32.3E
800039
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE
15129
05/23/90
202.54
800040
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C
15130
05/23/90
2.743.61
800044
STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI
15131
05/23/90
250.00
800052
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK
15132
05/23/90
645.23
LIQUOR
FUND
13.463.98 *w
GRAND TOTALL ALL CHECKS (15063 to 151M
$94.410.82