Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 08-13-1990AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Monday, August 13, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. Mayor: Ken Maus Council Members: Fran Fair, Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held July 23, 1990. 3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. 4. Public hearing and consideration to adopt a resolution relating to the modification of the tax increment finance plan relating to Tax Increment Finance District No. 1-9 (Tapper's, Inc.). 5. Consideration of a variance request to allow no hard surfacing in a loading berth accessway. Applicant, N.artie's Farm Service. 5A. Consideration of a conditional use permit allowing a reduction in parking lot design requirements. 6. Consideration of award of bids for Project 90SW-1, repair and replacement of hazardous sidewalk. 7. Consideration of transient merchant ordinance amendments. B. Request for clarification of conditional use permit requirements--Riverroad Carwash. 9. Consideration of approving preliminary plat --Sandberg East Second Addition. 10. Consideration of approving revised feasibility report and finance plan for the extension of utilities to the Sandberg East development. 11. Consideration of appointing judges for the 1990 primary and general elections. 12. Consideration of purchase of playground equipment for Lauring Lane Park and Balboul Park. 13. Consideration of the purchase of used Vac -All. 14. Consideration of purchasing property adjacent to city hall. t 15. Consideration of renting out a portion of the old fire hall building. 16. Adjournment. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 23, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Ken Maus, Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson, Fran Fair, Dan Blonigen Members Absent: None Approval of minutes. Motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to approve the minutes of the regular and special meetings held July 9, 1990. Motion carried unanimously. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. John 2illmer of 122 Marvin Elwood Road asked Council if there is any alternative to the proposal to develop a cluster mailbox in front of his property. Gary Anderson noted that it is up to the post office where the cluster boxes should be placed and that the City does not regulate cluster mailboxes. Ken Maus suggested that Mr. Zillmer discuss the matter of placement of the mailboxes with the post office officials. Vicki Schluender noted that there was a lot of cooperation and cleanup that occurred in her neighborhood as a result of City and neighborhood efforts to enforce the public nuisance ordinance. She went on to note, however, that some property owners still have not been complying with the public nuisance ordinance. Ken Maus noted that those property owners that are in violation of the public nuisance ordinance as interpreted by the Building Inspector have been ticketed, and those that continue to maintain their properties in a non -conforming manner have been referred to the court system. Maus also noted that in terms of the public nuisance ordinance, two different people can look at the same situation and have a different interpretation regarding whether or not the situation constitutes a violation. Mike Chandler, resident in the area, noted that he would like to complain against the complainers and wanted to state that in any block in the city he can show the same situation as being complained about. He wont on to say that most of the complaints come from a single person. Pago 1 0 Council Minutes - 7/23/90 Vicki Schluender noted that the problems she has cited in her neighborhood are a city-wide problem. After discussion, it was determined that Building Inspector, Gary Anderson, would consult with City Attorney, Tom Hayes, regarding each public nuisance complaint and determine if the complaint is warranted based on the public nuisance ordinance language. Warren Smith agreed that the City has toughened the ordinance and that pressure should now be brought on the county to process the complaints. He went on to note that the City should not be overly tough and that homeowners should have some freedom in choosing how to manage their property. Shirley Anderson agreed. She noted that if you want tight restrictions in your neighborhood, you should establish them before you move in. Dan Blonigen noted that the ordinance is sufficient, but the courts should be moving quicker. Painting restrictions are difficult to enforce. He challenged the neighbors by asking if they are truly neighbors or are they merely living side by side. Fran Fair stated that the City has made strides toward improving neighborhoods by amending the public nuisance ordinance and enforcing it better. She went on to note that the City should give some people credit for having the courage to improve their neighborhoods. Public hearing on inspection r000rt. consideration of orderinq abatement of hazardous sidewalks, and authorization to advertise for bids for sidewalk repairs and replacements. The public hearing was opened. John Simola reported that the sidewalk information meeting was hold Monday, July 16. Nino residents attended the meeting. Those individuals that attended appeared to support the City's new cost sharing policy. Their questions related to cost sharing removal of sidewalks off the grid and extensions of the grid to abutting sidewalks. Council reviewed requests submitted by Ben Smith, Ann Lindberg, Lester and Ruth Harstad, and Bridge Water Telephone Company that proposed extension of the grid system to the northerly half of Block 33 to include the sidewalk on the Pago 2 Council Minutes - 7/23/90 south side of East Third Street between Pine and Cedar Streets. In addition, the City received a petition from Trinity Lutheran Church and Todd Holt which requested extension of the grid system to the north side of Broadway on the block occupied by Trinity Lutheran Church and the Todd Holt property. The Council also reviewed a letter from John Lilja of 500 West 3rd Street asking that his sidewalk on Maple Street be removed from the grid. Council and staff responded to questions submitted by citizens. Tom Bose, City Inspector, noted that uneven sidewalk panels can be corrected by grinding the elevated panel to match the lower panel. Brad Fyle made comments regarding the sidewalk grid system. He noted that sidewalks on Walnut are a good idea. Sidewalk on both ends of the cemetery on Highway 25 was not a good idea. He thought sidewalks should be paid 1001 by the City, and it was his view that a sidewalk should be placed on Elm Street, as more people on the west end of the community will use it. John Simola noted that Elm Street is on a future grid system for development of sidewalk and that sidewalk will be installed there at some point in the future. Dan Blonigen noted that the City is being generous by paying 75% of the cost to install sidewalks on the grid system. Blonigen went on to note that there are many areas in the community that have no access to sidewalks at all, yet part of their tax dollar is being used for development of sidewalks in front of individual property owners. Blonigen noted that it was not unreasonable to ask that property owners pay 25% of the cost to develop sidewalks that they have direct access to. At this point in the meeting, the public hearing was closed. John Simola noted that the sidewalk planned for the cemetery is not proposed for this year, and the proposal to develop sidewalk on both sides of the cemetery could be ro-ovaluatod in the future. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson to order the public works department to repair or have repaired all minor sidewalk problems on the grid involving two panels or less within 90 days. In addition, notices to property owners Page 3 0 Council Minutes - 7/23/90 with hazardous sidewalks on the grid needing repairs to more than two panels shall be sent notices to abate those hazardous sidewalks within 90 days. Property owners with hazardous sidewalks should also be sent a copy of a form or petition to have the City perform the work on a cost sharing basis. Those individuals with sidewalk off the grid are to be sent notices to repair or replace within 90 days or remove within 120 days. Council authorized City staff to advertise for repair or replacement of sidewalks with estimated quantities to be based upon amount of work to be performed by the public works department and 958 of other sidewalks. Motion carried unanimously. Shirley Anderson also noted that the grid that has been approved is a 3 -year grid. Sidewalk improvements should be budgeted for and completed over an extended period of time. Motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Fran Fair to allow the northerly half of Block 33 to be placed on the sidewalk grid system. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Fran Fair and seconded by Shirley Anderson to Include the side of the block encompassing Trinity Lutheran Church and the Todd Holt property to be included in the City sidewalk grid system. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion on possible City acquisition of industrial property from Farm Credit Services. City Administrator, Rick Wolfsteller, requested Council discuss whether or not the City should or would like to get involved in owning a portion of the property once owned by Jim Boyle and now controlled by Farm Credit. Wolfsteller informed Council that Farm Credit might consider transferring a portion of the property as payment of delinquent assessments linked to the property. It was the consensus of Council to not get involved in City acquisition of property and that City control over planning and development of the acreage ohould be limited to those controls already possessed by the City via the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. Page 4 Council Minutes - 7/23/90 Sandberq East development update. Consideration of interpretation of previous motion --is the deferral of Counter Road 39 project assessment contingent on Krautbauer Provid,nq new project sanitary sewer and waterline easements? Assistant Administrator O'Neill requested that Council revisit previous action taken on June 25, 1990, at which time Council acted to accept the feasibility study, approve the finance plan, and to order plans and specifications subject to City acquisition of necessary public easements. The finance plan includes retroactive deferral (abatement) of sanitary sewer and water against Krautbauer properties, reduction in lift station unit assessment from 98 to 74 units, and a lifting of storm sewer assessments until such time that the storm sewer facilities are needed due to development of Krautbauer property. O'Neill asked Council if it was the intent of Council to approve a three-year retroactive abatement of the interest on the County Road 39 project with or without Krautbauer providing easements for the new project. Fran Fair noted that in making the motion, she intended to require that Krautbauer provide the easements prior to the granting of the retroactive deferral of assessments. Dan Blonigen concurred with Fran Fair's clarification of the motion. A general discussion ensued. Atter discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair and seconded by Shirley Anderson to approve the concept of extending sewer and water utilities along the perimeter of the Krautbauer property. Abatemont of the County Road 39 project assessments as described in the June 25, 1990, meeting is to be granted subject to Krautbauer providing the necessary sewer and water line easements along the perimeter of his property. This easement is subject to the following conditions: 1) said utility extension shall provide no service stubs to the Krautbauer property, 2) and no assessment shall be levied against the Krautbauer property. However, at such time that the Krautbauer property utilizes the service line, a hookup fee or assessment shall be ostablishod at that time. Motion carried unanimously. Page 5 9 Council Minutes - 7/23/90 Consideration of authorization to rebid aarbaae haulinq contract. John Simola reported that City staff has been concerned with the high rates that the City pays for contract hauling of garbage. Our current contract with Corrow Sanitation increased 908 over the previous contract. Since the inception of the new contract, the City has averaged in excess of 258 reduction and waste going to the landfill through its recycling program. As a result, Corrow Sanitation has hauled 137 fewer loads to the landfill than they did the previous year. When approached by staff about renegotiating the contract, Corrow indicated that they would not negotiate for twice a week pickup, as they felt they were charging what the traffic would bear and the City could not get a better price elsewhere. As a result of Corrow's refusal to renegotiate the contract, City staff suggests that the City look at alternative methods for providing garbage service. City Council and staff discussed various garbage hauling strategies, including automation of garbage pickup versus the present method of garbage pickup. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Warren Smith to authorize City staff to advertise for bids and prepare a bid from the public works department to be returned August 27. Motion carried unanimously. Under this alternative, Council would authorize advertisement for bids based upon once a week pickup with existing garbage containers, once a week pickup with automated 90 -gallon roll - around containers, and with the apartments bid separately at once and twice per week. City staff would then also prepare a bid from the public works department with the City going into garbage business with or without a joint venture with the City of Buffalo. Bids would be returned one month later on August 27 to be reviewed by the City Council at the first meeting in September. Our current contract has a six-month cancellation clause, so it is expected that any change in hauling would occur in the spring of 1991. Consideration of change order 01 for Project 90-02, 7th and Minnesota Street improvement projects. John Simola explained that change order #1 involves three items on the above -referenced project. Item #1 is the addition of 8,530 sq ft of sidewalk to the project. This would include sidewalk on those portions of 7th Street and Page 6 02- Council Minutes - 7/23/90 Minnesota Street receiving new street as referenced by the 1990 to 1993 grid. It includes no sidewalk located off the 90-02 project. Cost of adding the sidewalk to the project is $14,500. He went on to note that we expect the actual cost to be slightly lower, as we will not now have to sod the 5 -foot strip taken up by the sidewalk. The second change order involves excavation of organic material beneath the intersection of Locust and 7th Street. It appears that when this street was constructed, not all of the organic material was removed from the street subgrade; therefore, since 7th Street is now going to be a minimum 9 -ton all weather road, it is important that we remove this material and provide a good street base. The cost to remove this material and bring in clean granular fill is estimated at $1,200. The City will obtain the black dirt and use it on various City projects. Consequently, there is some value to this material from which the City will benefit. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan Blonige n to approve said change order at an estimated cost of $15,801. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of boulevard stumo removal. John Simola noted that currently we have excess of 40 stumps located on boulevards, some of which have been there for many years. He went on to state that it appears to be in the City's best interest to improve the image of the community by removing these stumps from the boulevard and develop a program whereby we will continue to do so for tree stumps located in the boulevard in the future. After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair and seconded by Warren Smith to approve the boulevard stump removal program with the City paying for the cost of grinding out the stump, removing the chips, and placing black dirt in the excavation at an estimated cost for the 40 stumps of $1,140. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Consideration of adopti no a resolution callinq for a public hearing on the proposed modification of the tax increment financing- plan rolatin Q to Tax Increment Finance District. No. 1-9 (Tappers, Inc.) . Motion was made by Fran Fair and seconded by Shirley Anderson to adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing on Page 7 CA) Council Minutes - 7/23/90 August 13 on the proposed modification of the TIF plan relating to TIF District No. 1-9 (Tapper's, Inc.). Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 90-27. 11. Consideration of approving transfer from liquor fund to EDA fund for revolvinq loan --Tapper s, Inc. Rick Wolfsteller reported that the loan documents for the $88,000 have been completed as part of the closing process; and as a result, the funds should be transferred from the liquor fund into the newly established EDA fund. Wolfsteller reminded Council that Council has previously approved initial funding of the revolving loan fund in the amount of $200,000 from liquor store reserves. Wolfsteller went on to request that the funds be disbursed. Motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Fran Fair to approve the transfer of $88,000 from the liquor fund to the revolving loan fund. Motion carried unanimously. 12. Consideration of local cigarette vendinq machine ordinance. City Administrator Wolfsteller informed the Council of the new law to take effect August 1, 1990, controlling locations of cigarette vending machines to private business locations not generally open to the public and requiring other locations such as restaurants and grocery stores to have vending machines that are only operable by an employee providing special tokens or through electronic switching devices. It was noted that the City Council had discussed a few months prior establishing a cigarette vending machine ordinance that would prohibit or restrict locations of these machines, and it was the consensus of the Council that there did not appear to be any reason at this time to have a local ordinance now that the state has adopted their own regulations. It was also noted that if the state is not able to enforce their new law and violations are apparent in Monticello, the City Council could then consider establishing its own regulations and enforcement procedures. 13. Consideration of bills for the month of July. Motion was made by Warren Smith and seconded by Fran Fair to approve payment of bills for the month of July. Motion carried unanimously. Page 8 9 U Council Minutes - 7/23/90 14. Other action. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported on the steering committee's plans for the TRAM 250 event scheduled for Tuesday, July 31. Mayor Maus stressed the importance of keeping the park clean during the event and suggested that an extra garbage dumpster be moved to Ellison Park for the event. Shirley Anderson reviewed problems regulating location and operation of adult book stores in the city of Ramsey. Anderson suggested that the City develop an amendment to the zoning ordinance which strictly regulates the operation of any adult book stores that may wish to locate in Monticello. She went on to note that the City may wish to place a moratorium on adult book stores until such time that a zoning ordinance amendment is developed. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan Blonigen to establish a moratorium on development of adult book stores until such time that amendments to the zoning ordinance can be established which properly regulate this type of land use. Said moratorium is not to exceed six months. Jeff O'Neill Assistant Administrator Pago 9 � W Council Agenda - 8/13/90 Public hearing and consideration to adopt a resolution relating to the modification of the tax increment finance plan relating to Tax Increment Finance District No. 1-9 (Tapper's, Inc.). (O.K.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The public hearing may be opened for the modification of the tax increment plan relating to Tax Increment District No. 1-9 (Tapper's, Inc.). The proper 30 -day notice to the school district, hospital district, and Wright County, and the 10 -day local newspaper notice have been satisfied prior to this Council modification consideration. Minnesota Statutory 469.175, Subdivision 4, Modification of Plan, states a tax increment financing plan may be modified by an authority provided that there is 1) an increase in the amount of bonded Indebtedness (from $125,000 to $140,000); 2) an increase of the amount of interest in the debt to be capitalized (from $24,500 to $26,600); 3) an increase in the portion of the captured gross tax capacity to be retained by the authority (from $28,489 to $33,549); and 4) an increase in the total estimated tax expenditure (from $23,126 to $27,458) of the original plan. Within the development agreement between William R. and Barbara R. Tapper and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, the amount of guaranteed tax increment is $26,000, sufficient to cover the projected debt service of $25,767. And within the assessment agreement, the minimum estimated market value for the development as certified by the County Assessor is $750,000, which generates an estimated annual tax increment of $27,458. As stated in your last Council agenda item, the need to increase the TIF direct assistance of $12,000 to the developer resulted when the Small Business Administration officers would not accept the submitted SBA loan package. The required subordinated debt maturity had to be equal to or greater than the 504 debenture. The GMEF was reduced by $12,000 (from $100,000 to $88,000), and the Increased TIF assistance was inserted as equity into the SBA loan package. This satisfies the SBA requirements and allows for a greater remaining balance In the City's revolving loan fund and reduces the City's loan amount which is a third position loan. All concerned parties agreed upon the modification. As you know, the closing for this project was completed on Friday, July 13, 1990, at Wright County State Bank. To allow the developer to begin construction, the HRA did approve the transfer of $12,000 from another tax Increment district if, for some unknown reason, the plan modification was denied. I Council Agenda - 8/13/90 With no written or oral comments to the modification of the tax Increment finance plan, the public hearing may be closed. Council may now take action to adopt or deny the resolution. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Adopt the resolution relating to the modification of the tax increment finance plan relating to Tax Increment Finance District No. 1-9. 2. Deny adoption of the resolution relating to the modification of the tax increment finance plan relating to Tax Increment Finance District No. 1-9. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation is to adopt the resolution (alternative bl) if the Council so agrees with the reasons and facts supporting the findings for the modification (supporting data, Exhibit A to resolution). D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the original TIF budget (February 26, 1990) and the proposed modified TIF budget (August 13, 1990) for TIF District No. 1-9; Copy of the public hearing notice; Copy of the resolution and Exhibit A. 2 Tax Increment Financinq District No. 1-8 (As adopted January 23, 1989) BUDGET Land Acquisition $21,200.00 Improvements 1,800.00 Subtotal $23,000.00 Administration 500.00 Professional Services 3,500.00 Capitalized Interest 7,000.00 $34,000.00 Tax Increment Financinq District No. 1-9 (As adopted February 26, 1990) BUDGET Land Acquisition $ 77,500.00 Subtotal $ 77,500.00 Administration 15,000.00 Professional Services 5,000.00 Capitalized Interest 24,500.00 Discount 3.000.00 C $125,000.00 (As modified August 13, 1990) BUDGET l Land Acquisition $ 74,000.00 Site Improvements 15,500.00 Subtotal $ 89,500.00 Administration 14,000.00 Professional Services 6,900.00 Capitalized Interest 26,600.00 Discount 3,000.00 $140,000.00 I-28 O EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINO CITY OF MONTICELLO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council (the "Council"I in and for the Clty of Mon- d(COM. County of Wright. Stat. of Mlnneedta. will hold A Pudic hannlg at August 13. 1990. of aoproamia[W 7:00 p.m., st City Hatt, 250 EM Broadway. Monticello, Mkmaow, ralathq to de MODONd rrotiRCNgn. by Uicreeaed proloct Costs, the Housing end Redevelepmem AuderE - Ty's Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the sporwel arid adoption of the Modified RedevNop- mom Plan rivwn relating Marino: Piw fPrro�edd m0d4 ��, ay �� project mete. of the Modified Tax I! RedeirN T+ Tax 'n�Inil Dlaorcta Nos. 1.1 through 1-11, located PDrnem rolect No. 1; and the proposed modification. W increased projen Costa, of th Modified Ta Increment Financing Nan rNatlnp to To. Increment Financing Plan No. 1.9. also Ira<stad within Redevelopment Project No. 1. ell pureuatt to and In accordance with Min- nature Statutes, Sections 459.001 to 4a9.047, utUwrve. a Amended. and Sections 469.174 to 469,179, InCW slue, Be Amended. A copy of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelop- ment Plofect No. 1 red Ta Increment Financing Plane for Ta Increment Financing Distrlcta No. 1.1 through 1-11, u Proposed to be adopted, will be on file and available for Inspection at the office of the City Administrator at CM HW not later than July 9, 1990. The property comprising Ta Increment Financing District No. 1.9 is a follows: Lot 4, Block 2. Oakwood Industrial Pier City of Monticello. Minnesota, Ca mty of Wright. NO No.: 155-018-002040 Ownw: Oakwood IMustrlN Perk Further Inhumation fegarduip the Identification of the portal to tel kckided In To. Increment Financing District No. 1.9 may be optamod from the once of the City AdiMnlstfatnr. All Intermed prone may Appear at the heamg end present that, views *rely or N writing. Dated: 7.24.90 (Aug. 2 B 9. 1990) BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Rick WOIfrta9a. City Admmsdatd, Councilmember introduced the following resolution, the reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent, and moved its adoption: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE MODIFICATION, BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN RELATING TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, THE MODIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS RELATING TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1-1 THROUGH 1-11 AND THE MODIFICATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-9, ALL LOCATED WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, AND THE APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS RELATING THERETO. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. It has been proposed and adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City (the "Authority") that the Authority modify, by increased project costs, Redevelopment Project No. 1, pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended. It has been further proposed and adopted by the Authority that the Authority modify the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-11 and modify, by increased project costs, Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9, located within Redevelopment Project No. 1, and approve the Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto, pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended. 1.02. The Authority has caused to be prepared and this Council has investigated the facts with respect thereto, a pro- posed Modified Redevelopment Plan (the "Modified Redevelopment Plan") for Redevelopment Project No. 1, defining more precisely the increased project costs to be made to Redevelopment Project No. 1, the proposed Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-11 and the proposed modified Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Tax Increment Financing Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 (collectively referred to as the "Plans"). S) 1.03. The Authority and the City have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the modification of Redevelopment Project No. 1, the modification of Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-11 and the modification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 and the adoption of the Plans relating thereto, including, but not limited to, notification to Wright County, Independent School District No. 882 and Monticello -Big Lake Community Hospital, having jurisdication over the property to be included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9; and the holding of a public hearing upon published and mailed notice as required by law. 1.04. The Authority hereby determines that it is necessary and in the best interest of the City at this time to modify Redevelopment Project No. 1, to modify Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-11 and to modify Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 and approve the Plans relating thereto, contingent upon execution of the Redevelopment and Assessment Agreements by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Monticello, and William R. Tapper and Barbara R. Tapper. Section 2. Findinqs for the Modification of Redevelopment Proiect No. 1, Modification of Tax Increment Financinq Districts Nos. 1-1 throuqh 1-11, and the Modification of Tax Increment Financinq District No. 1-9. 2.01. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the modification of Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-11 and the modification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9, all located within Redevelopment Project No. 1, is intended and, in the judgment of the Council, its effect will be, to further provide an impetus for commercial and industrial development, increase employment and otherwise promote certain public purposes and accomplish certain objectives as specified in the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-11. 2.02. The Council hereby finds that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 does meet the requirements of an economic development district in that it consists of any project, or any portions of a project which does not meet the requirements found in the definition of a redevelopment district, mined underground space development district, housing district or soil corrections district, but which the Authority and City finds to be in the public interest because: 1. It will discourage commerce, industry, or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state; or -2- 2. It will result in increased employment in the municipality; or 3. It will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality. 2.03. The Council finds, determines and declares that the proposed development, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. 2.04. The Council finds, determines, and declares that the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 will afford maximum opportunity and be consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development or redevelopment of Redeveloment Project No. 1 by private enterprise. 2.05. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings stated in Section 2 and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2.06. The Council determines and declares that Redevelopment Project No. 1 is hereby modified, that Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-11 are hereby modified and that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 is hereby modified, contingent upon execution of the Redevelopment and Assessment Agreements by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Monticello and William R. Tapper and Barbara R. Tapper. Section 3. Adoption of Respective Plans. 3.01. The respective Plans presented to the Council on this dote are hereby approved, contingent upon execution of the Redevelopment and Assessment Agreements by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Monticello and William R. Tapper and Barbara R. Tapper, and shall be placed on file in the office of the City Administrator. Section 4. Implementation of the Modified Redevelopment Plan and Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans. 4.01. The officers of the City, the City's financial advisor, underwriter and the City's legal counsel and bond counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the respective Plans and for this purpose to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary to accomplish this purpose. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon., the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator. Dated August 13, 1990 Mayor Attest: City Administrator (SEAL) d EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 as required, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 3, are as follows: 1. Finding that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 is a "economic development district' as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 12. Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 consists of one parcel which does not meet the requirements of a redevelopment district, mined underground space development district, housing district or soils correction district. The Authority and City find Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 to be in the public interest because: 1. It will discourage commerce, industry, or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state; and 2. It will result in increased employment in the municipa- lity; and 3. It will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality. 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonable foreseeable future, and therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. City staff has reviewed the available financing costs for the development. Due to the high costa of the public improvements, the project would not be financially feasible without the City's assistance. 3. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the munici- pality as a whole. The Monticello Planning Commission originally reviewed the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 on February 6, 1990, and determined that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 conforms to the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of Redevelopment Project No. 1 by private enterprise. -5- 0 The project to be developed, which will be located within Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9, consists of the construction of a 27,000 square foot office/production facility to be constructed in the spring of 1990 and completed by December 31, 1990. It is anticipated that 25 additional full- time jobs will result from this project. 5. Finding regarding the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, Clause (b), if applicable. The Council does not elect the method of tax increment com- putation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subd. 3, Clause (b). 6. Finding regarding duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9. The duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 will be eight (8) years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment or ten (10) years from the original approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan, whichever is less. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the City requests 100 percent of the available increase in assessed value for current expenditures. Council Agenda - 8/13/90 5. Consideration of a variance request to allow no hard surfacinq in a loading berth accessway. Applicant, Martie's Farm Service. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As noted on the enclosed site plan, Mr. Martie is proposing no hard surfacing in the area east of the proposed drainage Swale. This area would be utilized by a semi -truck tractor in its movement to back up to the loading/unloading dock area. Even though the use may be occasional in nature, it's still used for the delivery of products to his place of business. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the variance request to allow no hard surfacing in a loading berth accessway. 2. Deny the variance request to allow no hard surfacing in a loading berth accessway. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the City Council chooses to grant the variance request, the minimum type of surfacing that should be allowed would be a riprap rock consisting of 2-4 inch size rocks to establish a firm base for the movement of semi -truck tractors in this aroa. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the location of the variance request; Copy of the ordinance section on hard surfacing requirement; Copy of the site plan showing the area not to receive hard surfacing. 3 ° NO AZW�oa' iii Af'•/', •li L v r A Variance Request to alloy davelop� nt of a driveway area without harN surfacing. A Vat gihh�nte Rpqueet to al a parking lot pe�imater without cu Iing to ba eatablishad kl�\ within. twenty (0) foot of an adjoi ing lot. A Conditional Ust+ Request to allow avelepapit of a i t driveway and padking area with les, +than the standard -- — \\ -- \hard eurfnrL'nB AAS.YJUnA—U0LIUr-, P— --- y �\ Applicant: Margies Farm Service 4. Loading berths shall not occupy the front yard setbacks. 5. Loading berths located at the front or at the side of buildings on a corner lot shall require a conditional use permit under the provisions of Chapter 22 of this Ordinance, and provided that: (a) Loading berths shall not conflict with pedestrian movement. (b) Loading berths shall not obstruct the view of the public right-of-way from off-street parking access. (c) Loading berths shall comply with all other requirements of this Section. 6. Each loading berth shall be located with appropriate means of vehicular access to a street or public alley in amanner which will cause the least interference with traffic. Cahall SURFACING: All loading berths and aD bo improved with not less than inch class five base and two (2) inc surfacing to control the dust and draccording toa plan submitted to and to the approval of the City Engineer (DI ACCESSORY USE, PARKING AtM STORAGE: Any space allocated as a required loading berth or access drive so an to comply with the terms of those zoning regulations shall not be used for the storage of goods, inoperable vehicles or snow and shall not be included as part of the apace requirements to meet the off-street area. (E1 SCREENING: Except in the case of multiple dwellings all loading areas shall be screened and landecapeJ from abutting and surrounding residential uses in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 (GI of this Ordinance. (P) SIZE: Unless otherwise specified in those zoning regulations, the first loading berth shall be not lose than fifty-five (55) feet in length and all loading berths shall be not lass than thirty (30) feet in length. All loading bertha shall be not lase than ton (10) feet in width and fourteen (14) feet in height, exclusive of aisle and maneuvering space. tol 41u�o Council Agenda - 8/13/90 5A. Consideration of a conditional use permit allowinq a reduction in parking lot design requirements. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. Martie is back before you with a conditional use request to allow a reduction in the parking lot design requirements. The City Council has seen the site plan several times, and this is the final design of his site plan to be considered for a conditional use request with additional conditions to be added. The enclosed site plan will show the areas indicated by the conditions which were attached by the Planning Commission. The color -coded site plan will show where the areas in question are. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Approve the conditional use permit allowing a reduction in the parking lot design requirements with the following conditions: 1. The drainage plan shall be completed, submitted to the Consulting Engineer, and written approval shall be received from the Consulting City Engineer. 2. A concrete drainage Swale/surmountable curb shall be installed from the existing curb in the southwest corner of the loading/unloading area easterly to the center of the drainage swale ditch. 3. The curbing along the easterly portion of the parking lot shall be extended southerly and terminated at the top of the drainage swale. 4. In the drainage swale ditch area where a semi -truck tractor will be maneuvering, the drainage swale ditch from 10 feet each way of the center is to be a concrete surface. 5. The remainder of the drainage swale ditch from the and of the northeasterly hard surfacing northeasterly to the northeast property lino shall have installed a sodded surface from the center of the ditch to top of the slopes. 6. Gates shall bo installed near the southerly portion of the loading/unloading dock area and near the southwest corner of the open, roof-covorod, outdoor storage area. Gatos are to remain closed at all times except when they aro being used to maneuver vehicles through them. Council Agenda - 8/13/90 In the two areas where the gates are to be installed, the first area near the southwest corner of the open, roof -covered, outdoor storage area, shall have a fence installed similar to the existing fence from the southwest corner of the building to the gate and from the gate westerly to the end of the southwest curb. In the area of the gate on the south portion of the loading/unloading area, a fence shall be installed from the gate easterly near the southeast corner of the semi - truck tractor maneuvering area, thence northerly along the east property line to a point where the northeast corner of the turning area would be completed, thence angling northwesterly to the top of the drainage swale. 8. In the area from the southwest corner of the open, roof -covered storage area to the southwest corner of the building, this area shall be regraded so the water run-off will flow to the westerly ditch. The green area in this area will be extended to allow a 12 -foot gravel surface driveway to run through this. 9. The entire parking lot area shall be striped to show where existing parking is to take place. 10. The landscaping shall be completed, the minimum number of over -story trees shall be planted, and the green areas shall be installed as per plan, with the area in front of the overhead doors not exceeding 50 foot easterly from the front of the overhead doors. The balance of the area east of there is to be a green area. 11. Screening in front of the open, roof-covored storage area located near the westerly curb area shall be a combination of the minimum sized coniferous and hardwood deciduous trees to achieve partial opacity. 12. The conditions shall be completed by October 1, 1990. If not completed, the letter of credit that is hold In escrow at the present time will be used to complete any of the items that are not completed. Council Agenda - 8/13/90 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use request to allow any reduction in parking lot design requirements. The Lime table allowed by Planning Commission members to October 1, 1990, may get a little late in the season if the City has to get in to have some of the work completed. A good share of this work as noted in the above conditions can be completed within the next 2-3 weeks, with some additional time to complete the seeding and the sod in areas as noted on the site plan. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the location of the proposed conditional use request; Copy of the site plan with the conditions noted; Copy of the color -coded site plan. \� f N0. KA ZA PA 1 4 � •� \� . I c .1 i i I u A Variance Request to allow devolo nt of a driveway area without hart surfacing. A Vo nee Request to allow a parking lot peiimetor without cur ing to be. established \ within. twenty (2p) feet of an a]oi ing•'lot. A Conditional Us b Roq'.aet t o allow evelopmPAt of a driveway and poriking arao with leei than the standard hard urfnrinB a?t� fi4391R�i02111L0>w -- �\ Applicant: Margies Farm Service I —T EDITION 05 • • • • • •— / SOD DRAINAGE SVALE • J '�- • • COND ET ION 07 �,• FENCE _ CONDITION 14 COMPLETE CONCRETE DRAINAGE SVALE SURFACING CONDITION 03 �• CONDITION 02 E COMPL TE CONCRETE CURB \ �• CONCRETE DRAINAGE SVALE/SURMOUNTABLE CURB L d1' !1 CONDITION 1 C 1 PARKING tl IAT STRIPPING J 1 1 CONDITION •'- cote Cou��Ty 964D �ii7 �r /B � aCONDITION ' RECRAD INg1,' CONDITION 07 PENCE • CONDITION 06 GATE CONDITION I11 SCR?�({} nr. Cou��Ty 964D �ii7 0 • r l I � 1 i i r i M. / Y f t ' �' tiles_ • , .t . r s 1 !� i l f t� �l i '� � - � • is � � I f; OFFICE/ RE TRIL Si Dr, r—SQDDEO_ORAINAGE SWW ;N\' WAP,EPOUSE BLDG E]_LANaUPEO_APERS.__ r r _ CONMI TC $UPFACC _RIP'RAPPEQ_R0 K.SUP.(ACE_ Ems..,- ASPHALI5UPSALE rrompurlDRcuAG:SWAawrfAw, GRAVEL 59UACE©CpNf�E1C ORAINAr: SutaLf �_ORA,IAIA6ESurncF/CuPB GREEN_ARfAS_ .. Council Agenda - 8/13/90 6. Consideration of award of bids for Project 90SW-1, repair and replacement of hazardous sidewalk. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff has advertised for the replacement of 8,500 sq ft of 4 -inch concrete sidewalk, 1,350 sq ft of 6 -inch concrete sidewalk/driveway pavement, and some miscellaneous curb, sod, and concrete grinding. Due to the complexity and timing of the removals, City staff felt it was best for the City to do the removals on an as -needed basis. The public works department will prepare a cost estimate on a per square foot basis for removals. The bids are due at 10:00 a.m., Monday, August 13. A bid tabulation and a recommendation from City staff will be available for Monday evening's meeting. We have already received several request forms from citizens authorizing us to replace their hazardous sidewalks on the grid. We expect to receive many more of those after the prices are known. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution for adoption. 7 749 -OU To: +';emhrrs of the Citi,CounciI the hotel: owners alonl, Um tem'Llt shoe of 1�i,sL :,Pu.nit it.!, I:L'Llli,r❑ l.innesotn and :loplc Streets are requesting Le be addo; Lu •i.ltr. current City of Monticello Sidewalk frit Sysl.rss. ' '- Fu117i:tiiw�',il c`�' fLii i eainis �A y—Liu arr• to the Grid System. Bottle orntcrs on this I.lucl: have children -Aw roue Lheir hikes extensively fruti one a:nd of Lhe Llucl: Lo Lhe other. flan, pumpli: c;c Litis block vilicu Llr , gt: Lo Lhr. Pus;..^.ffice, +wwnt tm•:n sl:oppimn L^ Trinil.y Luthern Church, (which is also on the Grid) ect. All fuer of the hot:c owners on this block are unanivivusly it! favnr of Weping I.h:: sideuall: in tact and in good repair. Two Council t.icmbcrs (.ir. warren Smith and :h•, pan Glt!nigcn) looked at our sidewalk, they hoLh a;lrw-a that if all sidewali:s in Unin turn in Lace- shape and conditiun that our sidewalk was in, these court Lu n') recd Ln tiorry alwuL repairing any sidewalks at all. there arc roughly to 5 panels that have either raismi or ltnvercw: over Lite years that void t w:t:d Lo be ;iLl.entleil to, and LhaL wnult; astke an excellent sido.t.til: for iliv pul lie to a> imutc un. ole :would appreciate yutu• consideration on Lhis w..LLcv. i o Think You, l�(,i,L0 IV.'..,.... �! COST ALLOCATIONS c®� CITY OF MONTICELLO PROJECT 90SW-1, SIDEWALK I. 4 -INCH THICK SIDEWALK, INCLUDES SOD RESTORATION 1. 4 -ft sidewalk removed, 4 -ft sidewalk installed A. $ .90/sq ft removal X 258 X 4 -ft wide = $ .90 B. $1.92/sq ft installed X 258 X 4 -ft wide = 1.92 Property Owner Cost Per Lineal Foot - $ 2.62 2. 4 -ft sidewalk removed, 5 -ft sidewalk installed A. $ .90/sq ft removal X 25% X 4 -ft wide $ .90 B. $1.92/sq ft installed X 258 X 5 -ft wide = 2.40 Property Owner Cost Per Lineal Foot - $ 3.30 3. 5 -ft sidewalk removed, 5 -ft sidewalk Installed A. $ .90/sq ft removal X 25% X 5 -ft wide - $ 1.13 B. $1.92/sq ft installed X 258 X 5 -ft wide 2.40 Property Owner Cost Per Lineal Foot $ 3.53 II. 6 -INCH THICK SIDEWALKS IN DRIVEWAYS 1. 4 -ft sidewalk removed, 4 -ft sidewalk installed A. $ .90/sq ft removal X 25%.X 4 -ft wide - $ .90 B. $2.25/eq ft installed X 258 X 4 -ft wide $ 2.25 Property Owner Cost Per Lineal Foot • $ 3.15 2. 4 -ft sidewalk removed, 5 -ft sidewalk installed A. $ .90/sq ft removal X 258 X 4 -ft wide - $ .90 B. $2.25/sq ft Installed X 258 X 5 -ft wide 2.81 Property Owner Cost Por Lineal Foot $ 3.71 WALKCOST.ALL: 8/13/90 Page 1 3. 5 -ft sidewalk removed, 5 -ft sidewalk installed 1 A. $ .90/sq ft removal X 258 X 5 -ft wide $ 1.13 B. $2.25!sq ft instilled X 258 x 5 -ft wide = $ 2.81 Property Owner Cost Per Lineal Foot = $ 3.94 III. BITUMINOUS REMOVAL AND PATCHING (based upon removal square footage) $2.00/sq ft X 258 X 6 -ft wide = $ 3.00 Property Owner Cost Per Lineal Foot = $ 3.00 NOTE: City crews will perform all removals and will also patch bituminous driveways. IV. SIDEWALK GRINDING 1. 4 -ft wide panel A. 48" wide sidewalk X 2" grind width X $1.20/sq In X 258 -$28.80 Property Owner Cost to Grind 4 -ft Panel = $28.80 B. Property owner replacement cost for 4" X 4 -ft X 6 -ft panel $16.92 2. 5 -ft wide panel A. 60" side sidewalk X 2" grind width X $1.20/sq in X 258 -$36.00 Property Owner Cost to Grind 5 -ft Panel $36.OU B. Property owner replacement coat for 4" X 5 -ft X 6 -ft panel - $21.18 ( WALKCOST.ALL: 8/13/90 Page 2 BID TABULATION CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND APPURTENANT WORK CITY OF MONTICELLO PROJECT 90SW-1 Monday, August 13, 1990 - 10:00 a.m. Contractor 58 Bid Bond Base Bid "A" 1. Witco, Inc. Money Order $21,725.00 c/o Bill Mettenburg 1903 Summit Dr. St. Cloud, MN 56303 2. Bruce Dalbec Const., Inc. Bank Money Order $22,437.50 Route 1, Box 45 Maple Lake, MN 55358 3. DNCON, Inc. Bid Bond $26,009.30 9870 -161st St. W. Lakeville, MN 55044 4. HCH Construction Cashier's Check $26,067.50 Route 3, Box 242 Monticello, MN 55362 3. Bidder agrees to perform all Concrete Sidewalk and Appurtenant Work described in the specifications and shown on the plans for the following unit prices (existing concrete removal by others). Base Bid "A" Concrete Work In place 8,500 sq.ft. 4" concrete walk @ $ ✓ /.q. ft. _ $ 1,350 sq.ft. 6" concrete drive- way/sidewalk @ S 0 �/sq. ft. = $ -7.033 -/--V— pavement 20 lin.ft. 86-18 Curb @ S j< /lin.ft.= $ C� 95 lin.ft. B6-24 Curb @ $ /t! /lin.ft.= $ 350 sq.yds. sod with black dirt @ $ / S /sq.yd. = S fa/, 600 sq.inches concrete grinding to remove verticle lip @ S / !2�9 /sq. in. = S c0 Grand Total Base Bid "A" S 5� 4. The Contract shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder as soon as practicable after the bid opening subject to the reservation of paragraph 8 hereinafter. 5. The undersigned further proposes to execute the contract agreement and to furnish satisfactory bond within ten (10) days after notice of the award of contract has been received. the r undersigned further proposes to begin work as specified, to complete the work on or before date specified, and to maintain at all times a contract bond approved by the City in an amount equal to the total bid. 6. Accompanying this proposal is the bid security required to be furnished by the contract documents, the same being subject to forfeiture in event of default by the undersigned. 7. In submitting this proposal it is understood that the right is reserved by the owner to reject any or all proposals and to waive informalities. 8. This proposal my not be withdrawn after the opening of the proposals and shall be subject to acceptance by the owner for a period of thirty (30) calendar days from the opening thereof. l SIDEWALK SPECS: 7/30/90 IMPROVEMENT NO. 90SW-1 Page 45 Q RESOLUTION 9 0- \ RESULUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement and repair of various sidewalks within the city of Monticello, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: WHEREAS, It appears that is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with In the name of the City of Monticello for Lhe sidewalk improvements according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Administrator. 2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposit made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of August, 1990. Mayor City Administrator J Council Agenda - 8/13/90 Consideration of transient merchant ordinance amendments. (R.W.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: In April, Linda Smith, owner of Little Mountain Flowers, appeared at a Council meeting to express concerns about the City's regulation of transient merchants. Her main concerns were that transient merchants may be offering inferior merchandise and non-existent service, and she supplied a petition signed by approximately 40 business owners in Monticello supporting some type of regulations. No action was necessary by the Council at that meeting, as the City has had in effect a transient merchant ordinance which primarily allows these activities with a permit and a daily charge of $50. While the City does issue a few permits each year, the $50 daily fee does seem to limit these activities. In reviewing our ordinance and comparing it to some I have obtained from other communities, there are some amendments that could be made to our ordinance to further clarify that a transient merchant must locate on private property with the permission of the property owner and in an area where sufficient parking is available that would not interfere with traffic flow. Another possible amendment to our transient merchant ordinance could be Added under the exemption category. While the City does exempt persons who sell to dealers at wholesale along with charitable and religious organizations, some communities also allow exemptions for the sale of farm/gardon produce items. As I'm sure you're all aware, the City staff did have a sweet corn stand removed from the former Dino's site on County Road 75 a few weeks ago for failure to obtain a permit. It the Council wants to allow these activities without the permit being required, It cannot legally have an exemption for only local residents or for a certain age group; and any exemption would have to apply to anyone who attempted to sell produce items within the city. We can exempt produce items from the toe requirement but still require the transient merchant to meet all other conditions such as approval from the property owner and not being located on City right-of- ways, otc. While the City only regulates transient merchants, typically most communities who regulate those activities also cover peddlers and solicitors in addition. The following is a brief definition of these three categories: Council Agenda - 8/13/90 Peddler: A person who goes from door to door offering for sale merchandise he carries with him and delivers at the time of the sale. Solicitor: A person who goes door to door taking orders for merchandise to be delivered at a later date. Transient merchant: A person who temporarily engages in the business of selling merchandise at a temporary location. Many communities and many ordinances I have reviewed require a license for all three of the above activities. While the City has not had many problems with door to door sales of merchandise, we do occasionally get inquiries from citizens about people selling fruits and vegetables door to door, etc. We have even had some calls from local business establishments concerning vendors who are going to the retail businesses. Since the City has never regulated a solicitor or a peddler, it has usually been up to the homeowner or the retail establishment being bothered by these individuals to ask them to leave. It would be a simple matter to amend our ordinance to cover all three categories and to require all three separate categories to obtain the same permit and meet our same ordinance conditions. The license fees could be the same for all three categories, or we could have a different fee schedule depending on the activity. While the City of Monticello only has a daily fee for a transient merchant, we could also establish an annual fee. For example, the City of Brainerd has a $200 annual fee only (no daily fee) for these three categories; while Anoka, for example, has the same $50 per day fee for either a peddler, so]iclLor, or transient merchant, or a $500 annual fee. While our present $50 per day fee for a transient merchant may seem excessive, it has limited the number of applicants over the years; and it the foo was changed to a minor dollar amount, I would assume we would see an increase in the number of applicants. Whatever fee is established should apply to any Individual whether thoy aro from Monticello or evon from out of state. From the information I have gatherod through the Leaguo and other communities, it would be unconstitutional to establish a different foo schedule for local residents versus other applicants, dust as it would be unconstitutional to allow local rosidents to 8011 farm produce with no fee but charge other applicants a foe. If we exempt, for example, form and garden produce items from requiring a permit, this would have to apply to anyone who wishes to sell this merchandise. Council Agenda - 8/13/90 While I feel our transient merchant ordinance has been effective in eliminating this activity, there could be a few amendments that clarify that the transient merchant must be on private property and obtain the written consent of the property owner. If the Council would like to exempt vendors who sell garden or farm produce items, this would be the time to add it to our exemption category. While garage sales by residences have not been a major problem, I believe they should also be limited as to the number they can have each year. There are a few property owners in Monticello who almost appear to have a continual monthly garage sale, which is almost turning into a flea market atmosphere; and I would suggest that limiting (without a permit) these activities to only three per year would be sufficient. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Modify our transient merchant ordinance by clarifying the activity must take place on private property and not on City right-of-way with the permission of the property owner required and in an area that would not cause a traffic problem. 2. Modify the transient merchant ordinance as above and allow farm or garden produce items to be exempted from the ordinance. 3. Modify the transient merchant ordinance by also regulating solicitors and peddlers, requiring all three activities to obtain a license. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: While the retail businesses in Monticello may have valid concerns over the regulation of transient merchants, I believe our ordinance has been adequate to curtail these activities in most cases. I would recommend that even if the City does not wish to regulate solicitors and poddlors, we should clarify wfthln our ordinance that the activity has to be on private property with written consent of the property owner, etc. If the Council fools tho sweet corn Issue should be addressed, we can amend the ordinance to exempt this activity from the permit requirement If you desire. Whatever you do has to apply to everyone; and if wo make the permit requirements less restrictive, I would imagine the business owners may again have concerns over our regulations. While peddlers and solicitors have not boon a real problem for Monticello, those categories could be addod to our ordinance very easily. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of two versions of our transient merchant ordinanco amendments. 10 3 -lo -I CIIAPTER 10 TRANSIENT MERCIIANTS SECTION 3-10-1: Definition 3-10-2: Permit Required 3-10-3: Exemptions 3-10-4: Application 3-10-5: Religious and Charitable Organizations, Exemption 3-10-6: investigation nod Issuance 3-10-7: Duty of City Administrator to Enforce 3-10-8: Revocation of License 3-10-g: Appeal 3 -LO -10: Reapplication 3-10-11: Expiration of Permit 3-10-12: Penalty 3-10-3 eW1-S'r/A '& OIQ z/MA#gCE 3-10-1: DEFINITION: When used in Lhis ordinance, Lite following term Ilan the following menning: (A) "Transient Merchant" includes any person, firm or corporntion, whether as owner, agent, consigner., or employee, who engages in n tempornry business (five days or lenn per colcudar year) of selling and delivering goods, warns and merchandise within the GiLy, and who, in furtherance of such purpose, hires, lenses, "Sell or occupies any building„ structure, motor vehicle, trnile.t, tent, rnilrond boxcar, bunt, public rnusi in In)LC19, lodging houses, nparlmenls, shops, or nay s w eet, alley or other plane Within the City, for the exhibitiuu and sole of such goods, warns laud merchandise, either privnLe.ly or of public auction, provided t.hnl such definition does not include any person, firm or corporntion who, while occupying such leuq,orary location, duen not sell liom stock, bol exhibits namplen for the purpone. of securing orders [or future delivery only. LoenLion utilized by Lrannient. merchnnls shall be consistent Wish ones identified an permitted in particular zoning district, and ndequnte off-aLreot pnrkinl; in nvnilable. • 3-11)-2: PI:RNIT 11KQ1111MI): H. in unlnwhtl for any transient merchnut Lo e.n)Inge in ally such bunineas within Lhe City of Montir.ello without first obtaining n permit Lhere,for in compliance With the provisions of this ordinnnce. (A) A daily petmit uhall IM required for any "transient merchant" no doflnod in Suction 3-10-I(A). 3-10-7 3-10-3 i 2) a. An annual permit which may be issued only to the owner or proprieter of a private premise such as a motel, hotel, shopping mall, banquet facility, service club, etc., wherein a transient merchant as defined in Section 3-10-1(A) may lease or otherwise occupy space to engage in said temporary business. An applicant for an annual permit must provide the City with assurances that each transient merchant engaged in business upon his/her premise meets the minimum requirements of this and all other applicable ordinance. b. The transient merchant shall operate from within a permanent structure on Lire premise. outdoor sales from parking lots or other open space is hereby prohibited under the provisions of the annual permit. C. Ho holder of an annual permit shall allow in excess of 12 vendors, stands, booths or similar sales area to operate per day, without the written permission of the City Council. (D) FEES: Fees shall be set and adopted by the City Council as follows: 1) Daily permit fees. 2) Daily permit fees fur a permit issued to a tranaient merchant v under the authority of the annual permit, Said fees to be collected l by Lhe holder of an annual permit and remitted to the City Administrator prior to the conduct of any business, -*except that transient merchants conducLinq their business within the confines of tlw commons arca of Any ahuppinq mall shall not be required to remit a daily fee. 3) Annual permit fees. •(Ordinance 0129 11/14/63) ••(Ordinance 0131 1/23/04) 3-10-3 E%Il4PT1ONSi The terms of this ordinance do not include the acts of persons Balling personal property at wholesale to dealers in such articles, nor to ncwnbpya, nor to tho acts of merchants or their employees in delivering goods in the regular courso of business. Nothing contained in this ordinance prohibits any sale required by statute or by order of any court, or provents any person conducting a bona fide auction sale pursuant to law. 0 t 3-10-4 3-10-5 3-10-4: APPLICATION: Applicants for a petaut under this ordinance shall file with the City Clerk a sworn application in writing on a form to be furnished by the City Clerk. The application shall give the following information: (A) Name and physical description of applicant; (B) Complete permanent home and local address of the applicant and, in the case of transient merchants, the local address from which proposed sales will be made; (C) A brief description of the nature of the business and the goods to be sold; (o) The name and address of the employer, principal or supplier of the nppli- cant, together With credentials therefrom establishing the exact relationship; (h) The length of time for which the right to do business is desired; (F) General description of items to be sold; (G) The names of at least two property owners of Wright County, Minnesota, who will certify no to the applicant's good character and business respectability, or, in lieu of the names of references, such other available evidence as to the good character and business responsibility of the applicant as will enable an investigator to properly evaluate such character and business responsibility; (N) The last municipalities, not to exceed three, where applicant carried on business immediately preceding date of application and the addresses from which such business was conducted in those municipalities; 3.So (1) At Lite time of filing Lite nppliratiun, a fee of $2.00 shall be paid to the City Clerk to cover the cost of investigation of the facts stated Lherein, Pit's a fee_ schedule adopted by the City Cuunci£. (11/23/81 8109). 3-10.5: Itr.I.IGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS, C%F,NPTION: Any orgnnizn- tion, society, association or Corporation desiring to solicit or to hnve. solicited in its nnme, money, donntinns of money or property, or finan- cial assistance of any kind or desiring to sell or distribute tiny item of literature or merchandise for which a fee is charged or solicited from persons other than members of such organitatione upon the street@, in office or business buildings, by house-to-house canvass, or in public places for a charitable, religious, patriotic or philanthropic purpose shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 4 of this ordinance provided there is filed a sworn .application in writing on n form to be furnished by the City Clerk which shall give the following information: (A) Name and purpose of the cause for which permit is sought; (B) Names avid addresses of the officers and directors of Lite organization; (C) Period during which solicitation is to be. carried on; (0) Whether or not any commission, fee, wages or emoluments nre to be expended in connection with such solicitation and the amount thereof. 0 3-10-5 3 -lo -S Upon being sat isficJ such nrganizatinn , nsvocint inn or corporation is a religious, charitable, patriotic or philanthropic organization, the Clerk shall issue a permit without charge to such organization. association or corporation to solicit in Lite City. Such urganizntinn, association or corpora- tion shall furnish all of its members, agents, or representatives conducting solicitation, credentials in writing stating the name of the organization, name of agent and purpose of solicitation. 3-10-6: INVESTIGATION AND ISSUANCE: (A) Upon receipt of ench application, it shall be referred to the City Administrator, who will immediately institute such investigation of the appli- cant's businessand moral character as he deems nacessnry for the protection of the public good and shall endorse the application, in the manner prescribed in this section, within 72 hours, after it has been filed by the applicant with the City. (D) If, as a result of such investigntion, the applicant's character or business responsibility is round to he unsatisfactory, the City Administrator shall endorse on such application his disapproval and reasons for Elie same, and notify the applicant that his application is disapproved and that no permit will be issued. (C) if, as a result of such investigation, the character and business respon- sibility of the, applicant are found to be sntisfnctory, the City Administrator •o ` shall endorse on the application his approval and deliver to the applicant his tri permit. Such permit shnll contnin the signature of the issuing officer and shall allow the name and address of said permittee, the clean of permit issued and the kinds of goods to be sold Iherrundr,r, the JnLu of innuance nnJ Lhe longth of time, not to exceed one year from Elie date of insttance that the snake shall be operative, as well as the permit number and other identifying description of any vehicle used in such licensed business. Each peddler, solicitor, or transient merchant must secure a personal permit. No permit shall be used at any time by any person other than the one to whom it is issued. The. Clerk °boll keep a permanent record of all permits issued. 3-10-7: DUTY OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ENFORCE: It shall be Lite duty of the. City Administrator to require tiny person seen puddling, solici- ting or canvassing and who is not known by such City Administrator to have obtained a permit hereunder, to produce his permit and to enforce t.lte provisions of this ordinance against any person found to be vinlating the same.. 3-1D-8: REVOCATION OF LICENSE: (A) Permits issued under the provisions of this ordinance may be revoked by the City Administrator for any of Elie following causes: (1) Fraud, misrepresentation, or incorrect statCmenL contained in the application for permit; (2) Fraud, misrepresentntion or incorrect staLemeut made in the. course of carrying on his business as solicitor, canvasser, peddler, transient merchant, itinerant merchant or itinerant vendor; 3 -lo -8 (3) Any violation of this ordinance; (4) Conviction of any crime or misdemeanor; 3-10-12 (5) Conducting the business of peddler, canvasser, solicitor, transient merchant, itinerant merchant, or itinerant vendor, as the case may be, in an unlawful manner or in such a manner as to constitute a breach of peace or to consLiLute a menace to health, safety or general welfare of the public. 3-10-9: APPEAL: Any person aggrieved by the action of the City Adminis- trator or the City Clerk in the denial of a permit or revocation may appeal to the Council. Such appeal shall be taken by filing with the Council within fourteen days after notice of the action complained of, a vrit- ten statement setting forth fully the grounds for the appeal. The Council shall set a time and place for a hearing on such appeal, and notice of such hearing shall be given to the appellant. 31-10-10: REAPPLICATION: No permittee whose permit has been revoked shall make further application until at least six months have elapsed since the last previous revocation. 3-10-11: EXPIRATION OF PERMIT: All annual permits issued under tale pro- visions of this ordinance shall expire at midnight the 319t day of December in the year when issued. Other than annual licenses shall expire at midnight on the date specified in the license. 3-10-12: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemennor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by n fine not exceeding $500 or by imprisonment Cor a period not exceeding 90 days or both, plus, in either case., the costs of prosecution. (4/13/81 097) 5 ?r0pos-e-d CHAPTER 10 TRANSIENT MERCHANTS SECTION: 3-10-1: Definition 3-10-2: Permit Required 3-10-3: Exemptions 3-10-4: Application 3-10-5: Religious and Charitable Organizations, Exemption 3-10-6: Investigation and Issuance 3-10-7: Duty of City Administrator to Enforce 3-10-8: Revocation of License 3-10-9: Appeal 3-10-10: Reapplication 3-10-11: Expiration of Permit 3-10-12: Penalty 3-10-1: DEFINITION: When used in this ordinance, the following term has the following meaning: (A) "Transient Merchant" includes any person, firm, or corporation, whether as owner, agent, consignee, or employee, who engages in a temporary business (five days or less per calendar year) of selling and delivering goods, wares, end merchandise within the city and who, in furtherance of such purpose, fres, leases, uses, or occupies any building, structure, motor vehicle, trailer, tent, railroad boxcar, boat, public room in hotels, lodging houses, apartments, shops, or any street, alley, or other place within the city for the exhibition and sale of such goods, wares, and merchandise either privately or at public auction provided that such definition does not include any person, firm, or corporation who, while occupying such temporary location, does not sell from stock but exhibits samples for the purpose of securing orders for future delivery only. Location utilized by transient merchants shall be consistent with uses identified as permitted in particular zoning district and adequate off-street parking is available. 3-10-2:• PERMIT REQUIRED: It is unlawful for any transient merchant to engage in any such business within the city of Monticello without first obtaining a permit therefor in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. (A) A daily permit shall be required for any "transient merchant" as defined In Section 3-10-1(A). An annual permit which may be issued only to the owner or proprietor of a private promise such as a metol, hotel, shopping mall, banquet facility, service club, etc., wherein a transient merchant as defined in Section 3-10-1(A) may lease or otherwise occupy space to engage in said temporary business. An applicant for an annual permit must provide the City with assurances that 0 each transient merchant engaged in business upon his/her premise meets the minimum requirements of this and all other applicable ordinance. 2. The transient merchant shall operate from within a permanent structure on the premise. Outdoor sales from parking lots or other open space is hereby prohibited under the provisions of the annual permit. 3. No holder of an annual permit shall allow in excess of 12 vendors, stands, booths, or similar sales area to operate per day without the written permission of the City Council. (B) FEES: Fees shall be set and adopted by the City Council as follows: Daily permit fees. 2. Dally permit fees for a permit issued to a transient merchant under the authority of the annual permit, said fees to be collected by the holder of an annual permit and remitted to the City Administrator prior to the conduct of any business, ••except that transient merchants conductinq their business within the confines of the commons area of any shoppinq mall shall not be required to remit a daily fee. 3. Annual permit fees. •(Amendment #129, 11/14/83) ••(Amendment #131, 1/23/84) (C) PERMISSION OF PROPERTY OWNER REQUIRED No transient merchant shall sell or offer for sale any goods, wares, or merchandise within the city from a stationary location or public or private property without first obtaining the written consent of the property owner or occupant. 2. No transient merchant license shall be issued for sales from any location which does not have sufficient parking for customers and for areas where customer parking would Interfere with normal traffic flow. 3-10-3: EXEMPTIONS: This chapter does not apply to the following: (A) Vendors of milk, groceries, bakery products, or other perishable commodities; or vendors of soft water service or laundry and dry cleaning pickup and delivery who make an uninvited call upon the occupant of a resident as a preliminary stop to the establishment of a regular route service for the sale and delivery of such commodities or the providing of such services to regular customers; or for the sale of goods, merchandise, or services to business, commorcial, or industrial users at their place of business. f B) Sidewalk sales authorized by the City Council. 0 (C) Garage sales or rummage sales when conducted in or by a non-profit nstitution or when conducted upon the premises of an owner of the articles being offered for sale provided that such sales do not last longer than 72 hours and provided that no more than three (3) sales be conducted at any given location within one year. (D) Any bona fide auction sale by a city resident. (E) Any sale under court order. (F) The sale of regularly published newspapers. (G) The sale of goods or merchandise on behalf of bona fide charitable, religious, civic, education, or political organization subject to provisions of 3-10-2(C) and 3-10-5. (H) Sale of farm or garden produce subject to provisions of 3-30-2(C). 3-10-4: APPLICATION: Applicants for a permit under this ordinance shall file with the City Clerk a sworn application in writing on a form to be furnished by the City Clerk. The application shall give the following information: (A) Name and physical description of applicant; (B) Complete permanent home and local address of the applicant and, in the -ase of transient merchants, the local address from which proposed sales will .e mode; (C) A brief description of the nature of the business and the goods to be sold; (D) The name and address of the employer, principal, or supplier of the applicant together with credentials therefrom establishing the exact relationship; (E) The length of time for which the right to do business is desired; (F) General description of items to be sold; (G) Thu names of at least two property owners of Wright County, Minnesota, who will certify as to the applicant's good character and business reepoctability or, in liou of the names of references, such other available ovidunce as to the good character and business responsibility of the applicant as will enable an Investigator to properly evaluate such character and business responsibility; (H) The last municipalities, not to exceed three, where applicant carried on business immediately preceding date of application and the addresses from which such business was conducted in those municipalities; (1) At the time of filing the application, a fee of $3.50 shall be paid to he City Clark to cover the cost of investigation of the facts stated heroin, plus a fee schedule adopted by the City Council. (1107, 11/23/81) 3-10-5: RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS, EXEMPTION: Any organization, society, association, or corporation desiring to solicit or to have solicited in its name, money, donations of money or property, or financial assistance of any kind, or desiring to sell or distribute any item of literature or merchandise for which a fee is charged or solicited from persons other than members of such organizations upon the streets, in office or business buildings, by house-to-house canvass, or in public places for a charitable, religious, pdtriotic, or philanthropic purpose shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 4 of this ordinance provided there Is filed a sworn application in writing on a form to be furnished by the City Clerk which shall give the following information: (A) Name and purpose of the cause for which permit is sought; (B) Names and addresses of the officers and directors of the organization; (C) Pe clod during which solicitation is to be carried on; (D) whether or not any commission, fee, wages, or emoluments are to be expended in connection with such solicitation and the amount thereof. Upon being satisfied that such organization, association, or corporation is a religious, charitable, patriotic, or philanthropic organization, the Clerk shall issue a permit without charge to such organization, association, or corporation to solicit in the city. Such organization, association, or corporation shall furnish all of its members, agents, or representatives ^onduct ing solicitation credentials in writing stating the name of the rganization, name of agent, and purpose of solicitation. 3-10-5: INVESTIGATION AND ISSUANCE: (A) Upon recetpt of each application, it shall be referred to the City Administrator, who will immediately institute such investigation of the applicant's business and moral character as he doems necessary for the protection of the public good and shall endorse the application in the manner prescribed in this section within 72 hours after it has been filed by the applicant with the City. (B) If, as a result of such investigation, the applicant's character or business responsibility is found to be unsatisfactory, the City Administrator shall endorse on such application his disapproval and reasons for the same and notity the applicant that his application is disapproved and that no permit will be issued. (C) If, as a rosult of such investigation, the character and business ruspunslbllity of the applicant are found to be satisfactory, the City Administrator shall endorse on the application his approval and delivor to tho applicant his permit. Such permit shall contain the signature of the Issuing officer and shall show the name and address of said permittoe, the class of permit issued and the kinds of goods to be sold thoreundor, the date of Issuance and the length of time, not to exceed one year, from the date of Issuance that the same shall be operative, as well as the permit number and { ther Identifying description of any vehicle used in such licensed business. 0 Each peddler, solicitor, or transient merchant must secure a personal permit. :o permit shall be used at any time by any person other than the one to whom it is issued. The Clerk shall keep a permanent record of all permits Issued. 3-10-7: DUTY OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ENFORCE: It shall be the duty of the City Administrator to require any person seen peddling, soliciting, or canvassing, and who is not known by such City Administrator to have obtained a permit hereunder, to produce his permit and to enforce the provisions of this ordinance against any person found to be violating the same. 3-10-8: REVOCATION OF LICENSE: (A) Permits issued under the provisions of this ordinance may be revoked by the City Administrator for any of the following causes: (1) Fraud, misrepresentation, or incorrect statement contained in the application for permit; (2) Fraud, misrepresentation, or incorrect statement made in the course of carrying on his business as solicitor, canvasser, peddler, transient merchant, itinerant merchant, or itinerant vendor; (3) Any violation of this ordinance; (4) Conviction of any crime or misdemeanor; (5) Conducting the business of peddler, canvasser, solicitor, transient merchant, Itinerant merchant, or itinerant vendor, as the case may be, in an unlawful manner or in such a manner as to constitute a breach of peace or to constitute a menace to health, safety, or general welfare of the public. 3-10-9: APPEAL: Any person aggrieved by the action of the City Administrator or the City Clerk in the denial of a permit or revocation may appeal to the Council. Such appeal shall be taken by filing with the Council within fourteen days after notice of the action complained of and a written statement setting forth fully the grounds for the appeal. The Council shall sot a time and place for a hearing on such appeal, and notice of such hearing shall bo given to the appellant. 3-10-10: REAPPLICATION: No permittee whose permit has been revoked shall make further application until at least six months have elapsed since the last previous revocation. 3-10-11: EXPIRATION OF PERMIT: All annual permits issued under the provisions of this ordinance shall expire at midnight the 31st day of December in tho year when issued. Other than annual licenses shall explro at midnight on tho date specified in the license. 3-10-12: PENALTY: Any porson who violates any provision of this ordinance Is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be unished by a fine not oxcooding $500 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days or both plus, in either case, the costs of prosocution. (4/13/81, #97) 0 CHAPTER 10 TRANSIENT MERCHANTS SECTION: Oproposecl (2) 3-10-1: Definition 3-10-2: Permit Required 3-10-3: Exemptions 3-10-4: Application 3-10-5: Religious and Charitable Organizations, Exemption 3-10-6: Investigation and Issuance 3-10-7: Duty of City Administrator to Enforce 3-10-8: Revocation of License 3-10-9: Appeal 3-10-10: Reapplication 3-10-11: Expiration of Permit 3-10-12: Penalty 3-10-1: DEFINITION: When used in this ordinance, the following term has the following meaning: (A) "Transient Merchant" includes any person, firm, or corporation, whether as owner, agent, consignee, or employee, who engages in a temporary business (five days or less per calendar year) of selling and delivering goods, wares, ,nd merchandise within the city and who, in furtherance of such purpose, ares, leases, uses, or occupies any building, structure, motor vehicle, trailer, tent, railroad boxcar, boat, public room in hotels, lodging houses, apartments, shops, or any street, alley, or other place within the city for the exhibition and sale of such goods, wares, and merchandise either privately or at public auction provided that such definition does not include any person, firm, or corporation who, while occupying such temporary location, does not sell from stock but exhibits samples for the purpose of securing orders for future delivery only. Location utilized by transient merchants shall be consistent with uses identified as permitted in particular zoning district and adequate off-street parking is available. 3-10-2:• PERMIT REQUIRED: It is unlawful for any transient merchant to engage in any such business within the city of Monticello without first obtaining a permit therefor In compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. (A) A daily permit Shall be required for any "transient merchant" as defined In Section 3-10-1(A). An annual permit which may be issued only to the owner or proprietor of a private promise such as a motel, hotel, shopping mall, banquet facility, service club, otc., wherein a transient merchant as defined in Section 3-10-1(A) may lease or otherwise occupy space to ongago in said temporary business. An applicant for an annual permit must provide the City with assurances that 0 each transient merchant engaged in business upon his/her premise meets the minimum requirements of this and all other applicable ordinance. 2. The transient merchant shall operate from within a permanent structure on the premise. Outdoor sales from parking lots or other open space is hereby prohibited under the provisions of the annual permit. 3. No holder of an annual permit shall allow in excess of 12 vendors, stands, booths, or similar sales area to operate per day without the written permission of the City Council. (B) FEES: Fees shall be set and adopted by the City Council as follows: Daily permit fees. 2. Daily permit fees for a permit issued to a transient merchant under the authority of the annual permit, said fees to be collected by the holder of an annual permit and remitted to the City Administrator prior to the conduct of any business, **except that transient merchants conductinq their business within the confines of the commons area of any shoppinq mall shall not be required to remit a daily fee. 3. Annual permit fees. -(Amendment Y129, 11/14/83) —(Amendment 4131, 1/23/84) (C) PERMISSION OF PROPERTY OWNER REQUIRED 1. No transient merchant shall sell or offer for sale any goods, wares, or merchandise within the city from a stationary location or public or private property without first obtaining the written consent of the property owner or occupant. 2. No transient merchant license shall be issued for sales from any location which does not have sufficient parking for customers and for areas where customer parking would interfere with normal traffic flow. 3-10-3: EXEMPTIONS: This chapter does not apply to the following: (A) Vendors of milk, groceries, bakery products, or other perishable commodities; or vendors of soft water service or laundry and dry cleaning pickup and delivery who make an uninvited call upon the occupant of a resident as a preliminary stop to the establishment of a regular route service for the solo and delivery of such commodities or the providing of such services to regular. customers; or for the sale of goods, merchandise, or services to business, commercial, or industrial users at their place of business. ( B) Sidewalk solos authorized by the City Council. 0 1C) Garage sales or rummage sales when conducted in or by a non-profit .nsLitution or when conducted upon the premises of an owner of the articles being offered for sale provided that such sales do not last longer than 12 hours and provided that no more than three (3) sales be conducted at- any given location within one year. (D) Any bona fide auction sale by a city resident. (E) Any sale under court order. (F) The sale of regularly published newspapers. (G) The sale of goods or merchandise on behalf of bona fide charitable, religious, civic, education, or political organization subject to provisions of 3-10-2(C) and 3-10-5. 3-10-4: APPLICATION: Applicants for a permit under this ordinance shall file with the City Clerk a sworn application in writing on a form to be furnished by the City Clerk. The application shall give the following information: (A) Name and physical description of applicant; (B) Complete permanent home and local address of the applicant and, in the case of transient merchants, the local address from which proposed sales will be made; ,C) A brief description of the nature of the business and the goods to be sold; (D) The name and address of the employer, principal, or supplier of the applicant together with credentials therefrom establishing the exact relationship; (E) The length of time for which the right to do business is desired; (F) General description of items to be sold; (G) The names of at least two property owners of Wright County, Minnesota, who will certify as to the applicant's good character and business respectability or, in lieu of the names of references, such other available evidence as to the good character and business responsibility of the applicant as will enable an investigator to properly evaluate such character and business responsibility; (II) The last municipalities, not to exceed throe, where applicant carriod on business immediately preceding date of application and the addresses from which such businoss was conducted in those municipalities; (1) At the time of filing the application, a fee of $3.50 shall be paid to Lho City Clerk to cover the cost of investigation of the facts stated / Lhoroln, plus a foe schedule adoptod by the City Council. (1107, 11/23/81) O 3-10-5: RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS, EXEMPTION: Any organization, society, association, or corporation desiring to solicit or to have solicited in its name, money, donations of money or property, or financial assistance of any kind, or desiring to sell or distribute any item of literature or merchandise for which a fee is charged or solicited from persons other than members of such organizations upon the streets, in office or business buildings, by house-to-house canvass, or in public places for a charitable, religious, patriotic, or philanthropic purpose shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 4 of this ordinance provided there is filed a sworn application in writing on a form to be furnished by the City Clerk which shall give the following information: (A) Name and purpose of the cause for which permit is sought; (B) Names and addresses of the officers and directors of the organization; (C) Period during which solicitation is to be carried on; (D) whether or not any commission, fee, wages, or emoluments are to be expended in connection with such solicitation and the amount thereof. Upon being satisfied that such organization, association, or corporation is a religious, charitable, patriotic, or philanthropic organization, the Clerk shall issue a permit without charge to such organization, association, or corporation to solicit in the city. Such organization, association, or corporation shall furnish all of its members, agents, or representatives -onducting solicitation credentials in writing stating the name of the rganization, name of agent, and purpose of solicitation. 3-10-6: INVESTIGATION AND ISSUANCE: (A) Upon receipt of each application, it shall be referred to the City Administrator, who will immediately institute such investigation of the applicant's business and moral character as he deems necessary for the protection of the public good and shall endorse the application in the manner prescribed In this section within 72 hours after it has been filed by the applicant with the City. (B) If, as a result of such investigation, the applicant's character or business rosponeibility is found to be unsatisfactory, the City Administrator shall endorse on such application his disapproval and reasons for the same and notity the applicant that his application is disapproved and that no permit will be Issued. (C) ]f, as a result of such Investigation, the character and business responsibility of the applicant are found to be satisfactory, the City Administrator shall endorse on the application his approval and deliver to the applicant his permit. Such permit shall contain the signature of the Issuing officer and shall show the name and address of said pormittoe, the class of permit Issued and the kinds of goods to be sold thereunder, the date of Issuance and the length of time, not to exceed one year, from the date of issuance that the same shall be operative, as well as the permit number and Lhor Identifying description of any vehicle used in such licensed business. 9 Each peddler, solicitor, or transient merchant must secure a personal permit. o permit shall be used at any time by any person other than the one to whom it is issued. The Clerk shall keep a permanent record of all permits issued. 3-10-7: DUTY OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ENFORCE: It shall be the duty of the City Administrator to require any person seen peddling, soliciting, or canvassing, and who is not known by such City Administrator to have obtained a permit hereunder, to produce his permit and to enforce the provisions of this ordinance against any person found to be violating the same. 3-10-8: REVOCATION OF LICENSE: (A) Permits issued under the provisions of this ordinance may be revoked by the City Administrator for any of the following causes: (1) Fraud, misrepresentation, or incorrect statement contained in the application for permit; (2) Fraud, misrepresentation, or incorrect statement made in the course of carrying on his business as solicitor, canvasser, peddler, transient merchant, itinerant merchant, or itinerant vendor; (3) Any violation of this ordinance; (4) Conviction of any crime or misdemeanor; (5) Conducting the business of peddler, canvasser, solicitor, transient merchant, itinerant merchant, or itinerant vendor, as the case may be, in an unlawful manner or in such a manner as to constitute a breach of peace or to constitute a menace to health, safety, or general welfare of the public. 3-10-9: APPEAL: Any person aggrieved by the action of the City Administrator or the City Clerk in the denial of a permit or revocation may appeal to the Council. Such appeal shall be taken by filing with the Council within fourteen days after notice of the action complained of and a written statement setting forth fully the grounds for the appeal. The Council shall set a time and place for a hearing on such appeal, and notice of such hearing shall be given to the appellant. 3-10-10: REAPPLICATION: No pormittee whose permit has boon revoked shall make further application until at least six months have elapsed since the last previous revocation. 3-10-11: EXPIRATION OF PERMIT: All annual permits issued under the provisions of this ordinance shall expire at midnight the 31st day of December in the year when issued. Other than annual licenses shall expire at midnight on the data specified in the license. 3-I0-12: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be unlshed by a fine not exceeding $500 or by imprisonment for a period not excoeding 90 days or both plus, in either case, the costs of prosecution. (4/13/81, #97) 9 Council Agenda - 8/13/90 Request for clarification of conditional use permit requirements--Riverroad Carwash. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: In April, Ken Schwartz and Dean Hoglund were granted a conditional use permit to develop a Carwash in a PZM zone adjacent to the Riverroad Plaza convenience store. The Planning Commission and the City Council approved the conditional use permit with a number of conditions attached that the developers had to meet. The project is now nearing completion, and a question has been raised by the developers concerning the painting requirement of the block structure. One of the first conditions that this project had to meet was that the architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site would not be dissimilar in appearance compared to surrounding buildings as to cause an impairment in property values, etc. The developers had indicated they planned on painting the Carwash to coordinate and match the Riverroad Plaza complex to meet this requirement. When the conditional use was granted by the Planning Commission and the Council, the first condition applied described that the property had to architecturally be similar to adjacent properties but did not indicate that the property had to actually be painted the same color. The developers are requesting permission to allow the building to remain In its natural block appearance except for a matching color coordinated canopy. The staff was uncertain as to whether this would meet the intent of the Planning Commission and the Council when the conditional use permit was granted and is asking for a clarification. The Planning Commission also reviewed this request and felt the architectural appearance of the building as it is without paint did meet the intention of the ordinance and would not be a detriment to the area. In the Planning Commission's opinion, the appearance of the building was appropriate for the area without requiring it to be painted exactly like the Riverroad Plaza. The developers do plan on sealing the block building but do not fool that it is necessary to paint the building at this time to match Riverroad Plaza. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Council could determine that the architectural appearance of the building does moot the conditions applied and coincide with the intent of the previous Council action. C Council Agenda - 8/13/90 2. Council could determine that the original condition did mean that the building had to be painted to match the appearance of the Riverroad Plaza. C. S'TAF'F N C014MCNUA'1'ION: Because the developers indicated during the original conditional use permit request that they intended to match the appearance of the Riverroad Plaza, the staff felt uncomfortable in allowing the building to be unpainted if the Council and the Planning Commission also thought the building was going to be painted. You may wish to view the property if you have not seen the completed structure, and the staff also agrees with the Planning Commission that the building does not appear to be a blighting influence on the neighboring property in appearance. The staff does not have a problem with the building as it is if the Council feels the developers have met the intention of our first condition on architectural appearance. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of April 9 minutes listing the 18 conditions applied to this property. 12 ® Council Minutes - 4/9/90 cl®Ay 6. Consideration of a conditional use request to allow a car wash in a PZM zone. Applicant, Dean Hoqlund and Ken Schwartz. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the site plan which calls for development of a four -bay car wash in a PZM zone. O'Neill reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation that the conditional use permit be granted subject to conditions listed by ordinance and subject to additional conditions. After discussion, a motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to grant the conditional use permit as requested subject to the following conditions: ® 1. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. 2. Magazining or stacking space is constructed to accommodate that number of vehicles which can be washed during a maximum thirty (30) minute period and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 3. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than five (5) feet shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 (G], of this ordinance. 4. Each light standard island and all islands in the parking lot landscaped or covered. S. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [G], of this ordinance. 6. The entire area other than occupied by the buildings or plantings shall be surfaced with material which will control dust and drainage which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 7. The entire area shall have a drainage system which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 8. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source is not visible from the public right-of-way or from an abutting residence and �. shall be in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 (H], of this ordinance. D F Council Minutes - 419!90 9. Vehicular access points shall be limited, shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement, and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 10. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 9, of this ordinance. 11. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. 12. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. 13. Car wash facility shall have direct access to major thoroughfare via driveway or frontage road. 14. Intermittent sounds produced by car wash operation such as the sound of a vacuum or warning signal shall not be audible to users of adjoining PZM or residential properties. 15. Carwash bay doors facing residential areas must be closed during all car wash phases. 16. Hours of operation shall fall within the hours of 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM. 17. A screening fence and/or landscape plantings shall be established in the area between the end of the existing garage and the corner of the property in a manner that will properly screen the car wash activity from the residential area. Staff to work with developer toward finalizing the screening requirement. 18. A parking island delineator shall be installed in conjunction with the future commercial development of the adjoining parcel to the west of the car wash site. in the interim, a fence shall be installed along the property line, thereby eliminating access to the adjoining parcel. Motion based on the finding that the development is consistent with the geography and character of the area, and the conditions as listed will serve to mitigate a negative impact on adjoining residential and commercial properties. Motion carried unanimously. %I Council Agenda - 8/13/90 Consideration of aleproving preliminary plat--Sandberq East Second Addition. (R.W.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The original Sandberg East plat, which was approved when the property was within the OAA area, consisted of 18 half -acre lots that had to be sold in pairs totaling 1 -acre parcels. The individual half -acre lots were 80 feet in width and approximately 270 feet deep, all fronting along Gillard Avenue. Prior to this property being annexed into the city, one parcel was sold and a home was built now owned by Jeff Nelson. When the City began the feasibility study for extension of sewer and water to the Sandberg East development, Mr. Sandberg has been negotiating with Mr. Rod Norell, owner of Outlet A of the Sandberg East plat, on a possible arrangement to allow for Mr. Sandberg to replat the 18 lots along Gillard into residential lots that would be more suitable for City requirements and be more economical to serve with sewer and water extensions. It appears that an arrangement has been made with Jeff Nelson by Mr. Sandberg in which he will be reacquiring a portion of Mr. Nelson's property to facilitate the replatting proposal. The new plan calls for development of 17 lots and the elimination of one of the streets serving the interior of Outlot A originally located on the south end of the plat. The replat would also transfer the rear 74 feet of the Sandberg East lots to Mr. Norell, owner of Outlet A. This appears to result in a more efficient use of both the Sandberg East land and allows for Outlot A to be platted in the future more efficiently. Enclosed with the agenda you will find a concept plan prepared by Mr. Norell for Outlet A which is strictly that at this time, a concept plan. The replatting of the Sandberg East lots should enable the property to be more marketable with sewer and water being extended by the City. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to approve the preliminary plat of the Sandberg East Second Addition, which is a roplat of the Sandberg East subdivision. 2. Motion to deny approval of the preliminary plat. 13 Council Agenda - 8/13/90 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City staff supports the replatting of the Second Addition, as we feel this will result in a better utilization of the lano, including the future development of Outlet A. The lots as originally platted in the township had excess depth and when transferred to Outlot A will provide for a better development plan for this parcel. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of preliminary plat; Original plat, along with concept plan for Outlet A. 14 SANDBERG EAST SECOND ADDITION I f �II R 1� 12 iv Y b � �1 �•' f � ttSLM[,vTi� � t ,g s f P ' W P tn4N i, �11Y..� I ; i• a'W— •11� it ��� Mlw=�IWrw Air {R 62 ear, = 904 � = It?1tY/(� '= t4f . t4 +aa,d\ r i w,w�y.r,• +Vtt,�� 1�.2 cy'o.L ti \ / t j � ry NTl�'J4 tGliiw ,1 1 ��a�s,..r•cs.u..vM�.uit.�r.si.-i� Ii1a I�i.49JtG3'M�1� j� A y r aawq t • ORIcrf vfot —'gar SAN DBERG EAST - ; - I sf l _� �. - • el ft.Ma larll IYrYLNa � •+a .. - r � - — 3nN3AV [s 22s. rsp 6:.00. dYr IW9 f *1 of glove OOYY 1006 100 00/ 10'0/ 00/ 006 000 GOY p0/ OIC IOOf qOf i0^ Of loss 1 go" OM qOC: � 1 �- ---� =--r r-- -.•,fir--- 1 ,-=- $��� $ ^g .��1 � «� « ems• �� :� �, ��� � + � � �= co w' �v/��""-100 p •u a w w • a � MNM 1!M � V10vaM 1006 14Ma wM IOM 10M 10'O!• IOW � IO Wa IO W� 1 IOW IOOi IOM qMw 10 fJ IpJI_w/ ---_Yloru .-so,ei.00•-- -"`'� .a1l.uwi. 1 ------'--------- �-----•------------�---'-- ---- ---------------'--------------------------- vItz �a°`• 8�: o e1 1 8t ME I ..r. •.+r•f •n Jrr .rJa-.t.fna»wl .r -w j 1 I101 .Ce rO h.lJtJ.� � 1.f .If ✓, .f YJ fY i+l flan-. + •—_ __1i 2281 •1-2[,6[.00 M-- �� Council Agenda - 8/13/90 Consideration of approving revised feasibility report and finance plan for the extension of utilities to the Sandberq East development. (R. W.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Once again, the Council is asked to consider altering the planned extension route and financing plans to provide utilities to the Sandberg East development. At the June 25 Council meeting, approval was given for plans and specifications for utilities to be extended through Mr. Krautbeuer's property and Mr. Worell's property to service the Sandberg East plat subject to the City obtaining the necessary easements from the affected landowners. At the July 9 Council meeting, the Council was informed that Mr. Krautbauer had withdrawn his support of the utilities being extended through his property and indicated he would not be supplying the necessary easements to accomplish this plan. It was then determined that the project would still proceed with the City obtaining easements from Mr. Krautbauer to allow the utilities to be extended along the eastern border of his property with the project continuing on through Rod Norell's property to get to Gillard Avenue. Since July 9, the City staff has been working with OSM on determining the feasibility of pursuing this alternate route. It appeared from the City staff level that the extension of sewer and water along the eastern boundary of Mr. Krautbauer's property would be installing the lines in a location that would probably not be usable by anyone in the future. The staff asked OSM to look at another alternate plan of extending the sewer and water utilities along County Road 39 past the Joanne Halliger property, which is located in the township, to Gillard Avenue and then proceeding southerly to service the Sandberg East development. Bret Woiss of OSM prepared a cost estimate for this now route, which appears to be more economical than our original plan. The cost of—the project has dropped from approxlma.tely $295,00_ 0 to j251,0-00 using this County Road 39 Couto. The extension along County Road 39 would mean that the City would have to install sower and water in front of Mrs. Halliger's property, which is not currently in the city at this time. The Staff looked at this route as being more feasible in that Mrs. Halliger has presented a preliminary plat request to the OAA indicating a desire to subdivido and sell her property. It would appear that if development on this property is to occur in the near future, it only makes sense that the property should be part of the city and be subdivided under city requirements. Under this assumption, although the City would be extending services along township property, there is a very good likelihood that we would be able to recapture our cost in the near future from Mrs. lialllgor's development plans. Council Agenda - 8/13/90 A finance plan was prepared based on the cost estimate of $251,000, which breaks down an allocation to the benefiting property owners. It appears from the finance plan that the Sandberg East property would be responsible for approximately $101,000 of the cost similar to our previous plan approved in June. Since Mr. Norell would not receive any direct benefit of having utilities through his property, his assessment is substantially less at $17,300; but there certainly is a benefit to Mr. Norell in having the sewer and water lines available to his property in the future. Mr. Krautbauer's share of the cost for the water main extension would be similar under either plan and is estimated at close to $14,000. The finance plan proposed estimates a total cost to Mrs. Halliger's property at $58,000, which appears feasible in that she has the ability to create approximately 10 residential lots in the future. It is proposed that the City be responsible for the cost of extending sewer and water along the east side of the Halliger property plus a small amount for the oversizing value. The City staff has met with Mr. Norell, Mrs. Joanne Halliger, and discussed the alternate route with Mr. Sandberg, owner of the Sandberg East plat, regarding this new plan. Although Mrs. Halliger is currently reviewing the information, she has not indicated any opposition to the proposed improvements, as she is interested in selling her property for development; and I believe she realizes city sewer and water in the future would be a benefit to her. To utilize this route, the City would have to obtain temporary and permanent construction casements from Mrs. Halliger and also receive permission from the Monticello Township Board to allow us to use the right-of- way of Gillard Avenue. I met with the Township Board on Monday night, August 6, and the general consensus was that if it appeared that the cost would not be excessive for Mrs. Halligor in the future, the Township would grant the nocussary casements. In recent conversations with Mr. Sandberg, he is still adamant about pursuing the installation of these utilities yet this fall. with the project being bid late in the season, there is always that possibility that the cost will be higher than we could receive in the spring; but Mr. Sandberg already fools he has lost one or two years since annexation and would like to proceed at this time. Tentative Time Table In order to proceed with the planned preparation for this new alternative, I have authorized OSM to begin field and survey work, including the necessary soil borings to determine the 16 Council Agenda - 8/13/90 water table and soil conditions. This information will be needed by OSM in order to adequately prepare the new plans. If the Council is in agreement with this new routing of the utilities, OSM will take their field surork�and begin prepa_ration_of_plans during t e week of ve ovember- 13. The final plans will not be available until possibly as late as our next Council meeting, August 27; but the staff is requesting the authority to review the plans during the week of August 20 and, if they are still in line with our original cost estimates, authorize OSM to begin advertising the project by Friday, August 24. A project of this size requires an advertisement for bids for three weeks; and to avoid any further delays, the first advertisement should be placed August 24. The Council would then have final plans for the August 27 Council meeting for adoption, and this would allow the bids to be returned on September 14, 1990. This is one week later than we had originally planned; and in order to allow the construction to proceed on a timely schedule, the Council would have to authorize setting a special meeting for Monday, September 17, at which time a public hearing would be held for all property owners, and the actual contract could be awarded if the costs were in line with our estimate and finance plan. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Authorize OSM to continue with the preparation of plans and specifications for the new route along East County Road 39 to Gillard Avenue. As part of this authorization, tho staff could be allowed to review the plans that are available during the week of August 20 to determine whether the project is still on schedule and authorize OSM to place an advertisement for bids by Friday, August 24. Final plans would be on the August 27 Council agenda. 2. Council could proceed with plans as originally presented, which would mean continuing through Mr. Krautbauer's property with sower and water in a location that appears to be unusable in the future by Mr. Krautbauer. This would keep the project cost at $295,000 and would avoid going through township right-of-way along 39. 3. Council could authorize preparation of plans and spot's under the now alternate along County Road 39 but delay any action on approval of the plane or the advertisement for bids until the next Council meeting. This would delay the project at least two more weeks, moaning that construction could not start until at least October. Q Council Agenda - 8/13/90 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff is in agreement that extension of sewer and water along County Road 39 past Mrs. Halliger's property is the best route to service the Sandberg East development. We believe there is a better likelihood of the City recovering its cost of the project through the development of Mrs. Halliger's property than there was by going through Mr. Rrautbauer's property. it also reduces the cost to Mr. Norell, who may not be interested in developing for a few years; and this route actually cuts the City's participation in the project to $22,000 from our previous estimate of $39,000. It is assumed by the staff that the same three-year, interest-free deferrment would apply to the property owners we have to pass In order to serve Mr. Sandberg; but after working on this project for almost six months, this final proposal seems the most economical and feasible. The staff recommends that the Council adopt option Al and consider setting a special meeting for September 17 for the public hearing on the project and possible awarding of the contract. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Map outlining proposed new route; former route; and new finance plan. 16 \ -__-~-- �N,41 VZ110------------------- Alro ~ �* �^ ~_---~- *1 SANDBERG EASTINORELUHALUGER DEVELOPMENT - FINANCE PLAN - AUGUST 9, 1990 A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. TOTAL NORREL SANDBERG KRAUT HALLIGER PETERSON CITY TOTAL BAUER TOTAL SEWER $117,000 OVERSIZE VALUE $2.500 (2.500 52.500 $8.11411 TRUNK ASSESSMENT $8.646 68.545 TOTAL LATERAL BENE ASSESSABLE $105.854 FRONT FOOTAGE 2.737 0 1.557 895 0 285 2,737 COST PER FRONT FOOT 639 639 639 639 639 639 639 S39 TOTAL ASSESSED $105,854 60 560,217 60 634,614 60 $11,022 6105.854 LIFT STATION CHARGE $4.547 50 62,883 60 61,084 50 SO $4.547 TOTAL COST - SEWER 68.646 683.080 60 636.298 50 613.522 $121,547 $121,547 TOTAL WATER $112,017 OVERSIZE VALUE $15,000 $1,705 62.697 $1,023 61,705 6170 67,500 615,000 TRUNK ASSESSMENT $8.646 68.646 68.646 ( 'OTAL LATERAL BENE ASSESSABLE 688.371 FRONT FOOTAGE 3,387 0 1,557 530 895 T00 285 3.367 COST PER FRONT FOOT 626 626 628 628 626 628 626 628 TOTAL ASSESSED 688.371 60 $40,1185 613.910 623.400 62.625 67.480 688.371 TOTAL COST -WATER 610,351 $43,762 614,933 625,195 62,795 614,980 6112,017 6112,017 TOTAL SEWER AND WATER INDIVIDUAL TOTALS NUMBER OF LOTS COST PER LOT TOTAL C11 COST FRONT FOOTAGEIOVERSIZE 510.1188 6106,842 614,933 581.493 62.795 628.503 20 0 17 10 1 NA 68,285 NA 60,149 02,795 NA 628.503 NA $233.504 SANDBERG EASTINORELL(HALUGER DEVELOPMENT - FINANCE PLAN - AUGUST 9. IM A . B. C. D. E. F. G. H. TOTAL NORREL SANDBERG KRAUT HALLIGER PETERSON CITY TOTAL SAUER TOTAL SEWER 3117.000 OVERSIZE VALUE $2.500 TRUNK A V --A VI t 58.646 6R 648 TOTAL LATERAL BENE ASSESSABLE $105.854 FRONT FOOTAGE 2.737 0 1,357 BOB 0 m 2,737 COST PER FRONT FOOT $39 339 $39 $n s" 539 s" 139 TOTAL ASSESSED $105,854 $o $60.217 $0 934.614 60 $11,022 SI05,854 LIFT STATION CHARGE $4,547 $o $2.663 $0 $1,684 $o $0 64,547 TOTAL COST - SEWER $8.648 $83.080 to $36.290 60 $11,022 $110,401 3121,547 TOTAL WATER $08.517 OVERSIZE VALUE si.soo TRUNK ASSESSMENT $0.546 $0.640 TOTAL LATERAL BENE ASSESSABLE $03.370 FRONT FOOTAGE 3.367 0 1.537 530 89s 100 283 3.367 COST PER FRONT FOOT$20 $29 an $26 920 426 $20 , 1. 70 TOTAL ASSESSED $88.370 60 640,683 $13.910 923.490 92.6" $7,440 688.370 TOTAL COST - WATER 98.644 540,885 113.91* $23.490 42.825 $7.480 988.370 $98.517 TOTAL SEWER AND WATER TOTAL OVERSIZE $4.000 I INDIVIDUAL TOTALS $215.317 $17,293 IMAMS MAID Ssmail 92.U5 418302 $220.064 JO NUMBER OF LOTS 27 0 is 10 1 COST PER LOT $7.992 NA ".497 NA 15,979 92,625 NA NA TOTAL CITY FINANCED 977.081 $17,293 so so $39.708 to to TOTAL CITY COST FRONT FOOT AGFJOVERSIZC 622.542 I Council Agenda - 8/13/90 17. Consideration of appointinq judges for the 1990 primary and qeneral elections. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The upcoming primary election will be held on Tuesday, September 11, 1990, and the general election will be on Tuesday, November 6, 1990. Because of the statutory imposed deadlines for action, it will be necessary to appoint this year's election judges at this meeting. I am submitting a list of names of people who have previously served as election judges and/or persons who have Indicated a willingness to serve as judges at recently held caucuses in Wright County. A questionnaire was sent to those individuals, and 17 individuals responded indicating they would be willing to serve as judges. It is estimated that we will have a need for between 16 and 20 election judges based on prior years' turnout. As you will note on the attached list, 8 election judges who signed up during republican and democratic caucuses have never served as election judges for the City previously. The election laws require that cities are to first select individuals that have signed up at caucuses, and then we are open to using anyone else to fill the needed requirement. Fortunately, we will have 9 returning election judges who are familiar with the process if the Council appoints all 17 as recommended. All election judges will receive a brief training session for the primary and general elections, and it may not be necessary to have all of the individuals work at both the primary and general elections, and this will be determined by myself later. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The only alternative available is to appoint election judges. By state election laws, the Council is required to first appoint election judges from a list supplied by the county auditor who have signed up at caucuses; and then if more are needed, they can be selected from other sources. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Nona. D. SUPPORTING DATA: List of Individuals recommended to be appointed as election judges. 19 INDIVIDUALS WHO SIGNED UP AT DFL AND IR CAUCUSES: Walter Lusti Robert Nelson Cynthia Hamond Shirley Maus Mary Bray Robert Rohland Gloria Gasser Kevin Tvedt INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE PREVIOUSLY SERVED AS ELECTION JUDGES: Rosemary Dahl Kay Gauthier Jeanette Host Betty Lund Joanne Link Florence Mayer Lucille Clausen Leona Kline Rita Soltau Council Agenda - 8/13/90 12. Consideration of purchase of plavground equipment for Laurinq Lane Park and Balboul Park. (J.S.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: During the budget session last year, we discussed the need for additional playground equipment in the Lauring Lane Park and the Balboul Park. An amount of $9,000 was placed in the budget for this purpose. We have obtained prices for the equipment for both parks. For the Lauring Lane Park, we propose a 4 -unit swing, a play space, two small super scoop backhoes, a tree climber, and two benches. For the Balboul Park, we have proposed a 3 -unit swing with two tot full -bucket seats, two super scoop backhoes, and one spiral slide. We have obtained prices from E.F. Anderson and Game Time for the equipment in both parks. For the Balboul Park, E.F. Anderson has the lowest price of $3,894 compared to $3,923 for Game Time. For the Lauring Lane Park, E.F. Anderson has the lowest price of $3,790 compared to Game Time's price of $4,164, bringing the total cost for both using E.F. Anderson's prices to $7,684. The remaining $1,316 in the budget will be needed for hauling sand to provide a cushioned base, concrete for the mounting of the structures, and timbers for borders around the play areas. Enclosed you will find a copy of the two price sheets and pictures of the various equipment from E.F. Anderson. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative is to authorize the purchase of playground equipment for Lauring Lane and Balboul Parks from E.F. Anderson in the amount of $7,684, with the remaining portion of the budget to be used for installation costs. 2. The second alternative would be not to purchase the playground equipment for Balboul or for Lauring Lane Park. 3. The third alternative would be not to purchase equipment for either one of tho parks. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Park Superintendent that the City Council authorize the purchase of playground equipment for Lauring Lane Park and Balboul Park from E.F. Anderson in the amount of $7,684 as outlined in altornativo A1. The Park Superintondent has surveyed the needs of both parks and feels the equipment Is appropriate. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of map locating tho two parks; Copios of prices from Game Time and E.F. Andorson, along with pictures of the equipment from E.F. Anderson. 20 ---------------- 7-7 ---------------------- t !bo 4", AOLIIN 'B -A -LBO' UL PAE� N 5 9 of GAME TIME QUOTES Laurinq Lane Park Four -unit swing (655 + 150) $ 805.00 Tot play structure 2,282.00 Two backhoe diggers 478.00 Climber 315.00 Two 6 -foot benches 284.00 TOTAL $4,164.00 Balboul Park Threw -unit swing S 480.00 Two seats 150.00 Two backhoe diggers 478.00 Spiral slide 2.015.00 TOTAL $3,923.00 C (9) I I EARL F. ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 9808 JAMES CIRCLE, BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 PHONE (612) 884-7300 MN WATS 1-800-8626026 c, r'r o F IK#NTrc,tGco SOLD TO SHIP 6r1LaO�tL TO ORDERED BY (PHONE NO, DATE ORDEREDCUSTOMER ORDER NO. 4 LESMA. I SHIP VIA I SHIP BY $—L I I � 90 fP Coo• 0,—ItV COW" No, Site Colo, D—ioti— Su Az- SCS9 -L) L Il 001) suAE ✓• Price E.- Totel 534-ob 5-46,,Do9 .S�.Cv ICK(. Do .zj< �/bZJoO 3gyy oo 7 _ L / NO/fA �J qja '74a" SUBTOTAL SALES TAX FREIGHT F CUSTOMER SIGNATURIP INSTALLATION OATF , TOTAL NOTES C Arrunun rnr:IdFNT I� LV, ` 'I IM WWPM.W-A,.L��� tktll 8.16.0764 Sp}•roSlide here's a spiral -Ade -that sets sian- dant 14 safety. dmabdity atul +vtlue. TenderTuffcoated one -piste steel step sectain and hand rails feel soft and durable. Suppuned by tuvt 5" O.D. steel pnsts with a large entrance section that holds zeveral children. The la"slide moihdes.are riRild4d.of a ctthir-i'ast. hes' dansity polyethylene. Modules are. secured W a 314" Q.D. steel center column and w each other with recessed b:,h.- with molded in -T- nuts. The slide itself has been designed to meet the Consumer Prod- ucts Safety Commission's yntidel'utes for safety. Actual4ize: 10'6" r S'fi" AiepRe4uired:2I':, id' Independent Slides 1'h@se ate the t!turdic: i t;f heavy duty 4?idvs ji-O' dile onlay, iii gi�r. Our 16' lyra nutilt-1 an addiuntial eviller sway twice to beep tl'w uric rigid nix years of heavy. Estiive. • 111'lar,'e I;.thardzid ct z+I pets! Ftuc i.trrtatritnte{_'uhrrm r • f I:x� (;arc, lir Bru1c nt�:e�.-y r;i4tt Irl h to ria.:) • I`;°uU g.ihara;lrl;ir,l{crxltin"h.tw� + I�enti,li t;Al�Sra,:i+ipilz•Ii;:)'rrrtj.j5ut5 .r: _fir8 wry Sttutcl i'latfot,u tiett�.ay Chute rima Nu, Ilei�h� lent tlt St�tutn Neq. _ _ IG' g a} tG7:B' . iii° .r: _fir8 wry 842-0525 Junior Gym Center a compact fitness center incorporating a horizontal Ltdder, tri-lecel tuning bars, climbing poles and stall bars. Actual size: 66" x 1216" x 10'h,h Area required: iS' a 2.1' 842•4300SuperStoop 0'ur newue ,clidd.pored "pawershmvel" is fun to operate, and --it's a great uay to develop handfels: crmtdinatinn and gross mntur shifts. • I Irariesi'fiance of any ecoop or bhmvel 64 Landscape $ttuttwes • l ail ahinimum but -het • NIPtotatgm • lAll!rn-alum five bearbi w •.litfth't'I'tnTciutrd teat Rlrton' anachcd hind tigl[b • coillI 'tely a<_Sra:1a•d eU ep, Gnr iwal 812.0520 Curivd 3/ctu111afam'e Ream All WtcrdL%I+11"1e>>nta.d)tyn;tp ut the futidalnent,il tW ul balance, and Il_o5 c-itnrd bgrt- an addi- tu t Kil hagvoq o. (1 ysdrr ,tinted. twaJ:It ".I i • S�°t11t tirelrt? ra !Itt 1 cLi•` 11" 1`6 . 7',° 4th y )u' 4mq Ai..'d.ic-, rml. 12' . i W Q 5000 Series Sivings A standard swing unit designed for playgrounds that get lots of use. Two seats per beam make it safer than a three seat unit. 7ripod•type,end sup- ports make the frame very rigid, • WO.D.poader-coawdsdt.40pipe beam • 2%1 O.D. gahw&ed steel legs • Unique atuminvm compression cLlmpiog yokes • Gahw&ed ttmileable icon hanger with od impregrkited hearings • 410 straight link chain • Blunt faced, slash -proof belt.seats See page i12 for other types of seats atailable. !Model Na Na Area Configtuotion Na Swings Sections Heirptt Required 845-5823 2 1 8' 2$' x 25' 845.5123 2 1 1W 32'x26' 875.5843 4 2 _ 8' 28' x 36' t 8755143 4 2 10` 32'x38' AUnriw are audlabb sia Rndr✓/Wwatdrbaiw. Sarwrrraradttapr Sdamrm',*mru. taticrFtuDrtd� Exerglide Sent Exergiides provide much more support and are great for upper body develop. ment, They eliminate "bailing out, rear chain wrap and side-to-side coM. sions. A rubber bumper on the rear pmt'idesadded safety. Add them wither 5000 or 60M series swing frames. 6000 Series Ilea %,), D77ty SWho A heavy duty swing unit designed for areas of ntaximirm use and abuse. • 3.5'QQprnttler-Mteddch.40p°.pebe= + 2)b'O.D. rtivanized steel, kegs .• . Unique alutdnum cotnpreasuyn clamping yzkes • Dahaoized nu2e3h!e onn hanger with v8 imprebmated beating • 4,10 ettawit link chut + Bhux famd, 5ttsh=pn"belt seats See page 112 for other types of seats m-dabte,, 70 landscape Structures Model No. Na. Area Configuration No, Swinas Sections HeiSht Required 9454M 2 1 t0' 25' x 32' 1i t 8456223 2 t 12' 27' x 36' 1f i ijlj jj� 815.6133 , 3 1 10' 28'x 32' �UUIJ� 875 b 3 1 12' 301x38' 875.6143 4 2 10' 36'x32' 4 + 845.6243 4 2 12' 37' x 36' 845.661663 6 2 10' 43' x 32' 'i 875.6263 6 2 12' 441x36' Aa uciprr aNatnitr::• ai.+i TmLy'rtt f rmtrJ r4aiut, Snrnv laa�t:cgpr &hanntrr'.a;rrrn, 4c:nhrLnrtre. i+^ UI 1 289.80801 Full Bucket Seat' Molded of a high-grade, durable rubber compound. %bad.d.resistant spring steel reinforcing. Safer, heavy galvanized steel connectors prevent pinched fingers. 289.80805,11olded Contour Seat Made of lightweight, rigid U.V. stabilized polyethylene. Sinal dahanized steel con• nectoni instead of chain prevent pinched fingers. 289.80802 Half Bucket Seat Open front allows toddlers to climb In and out by themselves. Mulded of a high-grade rubber compound.l;tndal=resistant spring steel reinforcing. Galvanized steel conrtec• tors and safety sham. I , �A 289.80806 Flat Jlulded Seat Mulded of a high grade, durable mb. bcrcom unduuhaculidadununum, to encap, atedreuJaningplatefor added etrcnytnh and prulUtion against vand.&n, Spe, Lilly moldrd edges fort a blunt, in:pat t absorbing penmucc 289.80803 Slash -Proof Belt Seat. MoMed of a higlrgnde, durable rubber compound. Steeleable reinforcing and solid steel encapsulated end plates deter vamWa. 5peci dy molded edges form a bfu il, impact•ab_wbing perimeter, •Tlea ii a qut k 61.p ncm, Eserglide Seat Double pendulum action permits seat to trvtl only in a straight path. Excellent exercise for upper body development and tuning. Suing hangers not included. 817.88074 For 8' high beam W -81M For 10' high beam 014 CAEvMIT: EARL F. ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 9808 JAMES CIRCLE, BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 PHONE (612) 884-7300 MN WATS 1.800.862-6026 i �ry oF/�9oA?�o SOLD TO OIIDERED S• ABX' OA CUSTOMER ORDER NO. SALESIAN si*I"El I I Code 0wntltv Ceulo. No. Slto Color Tool yuNT s+w� gvgot sig. o0 AAysfvcF a2 /9-7s" OD ,Sc�iEx sceop .'gr V,/sa t od AEC- c m4acR —� IF CUSTOMERSIGNATURF DATE NOTES: -lAaa4 V" / SHIP TO )"HONE NO. SHIP VIA I SHIP 81 I F.O.B. Dwript on �/ MIcs Egon Tool yuNT s+w� gvgot sig. o0 AAysfvcF Aa /9-7s" OD ,Sc�iEx sceop .'gr V,/sa t od AEC- c m4acR 3sm ssr"Do GAr ZWbc asF1;t., Alai a a as � 3790,00 SUB TOTAL SALES TAX FREIGHT INSTALLATION TOTAL 0ArVkk'" 1W%ftU0 di Rainbow Climbers A popular aUt ion to any play area. Supplied in two pieces. • %', O.D. emnized steel cured pees • 1%. O.D. gahunized steel p.* ctimGing bb's 812.0607 Actual size: TV long x TV Ngh x 2' wide Area required: 20' x 14' 912.0612 Actual size: 12'6" long x 63" NO x 2' wide Area required: 24'x 14' 8"12.0819 Tree Climber An atwiee addition to any play area. • 2?; O.D, gahardmd steel plpe tnulk • KI OR gahmized steel pox: branches • Rader coated for douhlopnaenion Actual sire: 6' No x 321 dumeter AIYa rcipked: I dLumter rloy4prN-1h,a: Wur'•jua. 8,12-0399 Tri -Level Bary This adjustable unit can be used for turning, chiltrning or both. • 216" O.D. gi wlad steel p! a uprights • 1y,•" O.D. 0-w ized steel Gree ranting Gare Actualrix: 124" htaaimm har heights: V6" and T6" I� Landscape Structures 59 812.0525 Junior Gym Center A compact fitness center incorporating a huriumtai ladder, tr i•level turning bars, climbing poles andstall bats: rktuat size: 6'6" x 12'8" x V high ltna regi&cd: 19' x 24' fin:y+rV �++J rrst M va2�JLd wrr a 84243(h)buperScoop Ournew child-pouired "IxT%er shovel" is tun to operate, and=it's a great tray to develop hand!e}r cour6ation and gross motor skills. Meatiest home of any sconp or shovel 64 I:utdscape Structures • Gast alunitnum WICket • ;3tiit°rortwan I,trbrtcatt;ut fisc roarings • Tendeffufi rooted teat • l wtory aiLtch,eii hand Grips_ • Gnnl""Ietely a5si erl;ed exceNi f a Seat 42-0520 Carred .11art11 Balanee Beim AA t aur detrh}p-xg ep inn abi.`tp n_Niti=i s tlua tuntlamegGil _chffl of b:d.mcc, and tin; cunuti ccrdit�natinn gjves-an addi- tii,n.delwaengv, l4rrder"coated, • 1'." ,:1° • 11 rA"I: Furl tulamg tram. • „r,." 01 r 'let I IrpL I,•tia, -L•tua ct h: 111, r,:l;11 • 31:" a5It— t hmg aped ftlpmr1; IT r M, r,o{- ter•= wi i �'%r'F'� rw ',y•:^4' ' l.:' •,�._ ,7 7n:�,;ir,�iy:..n :-•- �,y.s t�:i;,��4°•_!+�ar,,r � . �'_..t �,.a J%'� ft'y;..: •.i-;,; .t"• y �4•� a• 1• � r yr F� �.;'•i.. ��:. . •��a.' r -•,i� � ,t;i:'r:z4i"r F, t-. >r'.,:,� i vc:`.-!;'+7?.�.'i•, ':is.�x-,-v^ ti'-=.:,. s. 5 � ,, *r_'S• � GK�;i+f>i;'t.•'.'3.=.^, �r" �•-!.. .�K .,' i � ��7.'�f,t.;S:,-K"3;,�.'�i.1a..` �t 1,:.. j,� • ..ti:." s �"'i.' � tet • i4+. .d;•t .tit•t..t +,,t1C, - %�'i: >{•^,�=.�"i` •�! ,i:�s Spring See Snn•NEY� ea`> = t �: ` ; : _ `:`•%_', ;" ' �I +_ ' Heavy duty iprinp keep this sec saw bnnncingtcithout bottoming rc °��;� "+,�. •i tttr out. Ilandhoidsand it}otrestshelp kids holdon. S' loo 3t'"O.U. '�ti°';'t powder:-coatedsteeibeamand coeneseats. Sur- face mounts to a Concrete base. 842-0652 a -Seat Spring5ee-Sacs � S I _ 912-W150 $•SeatSptingSee•.$aty qi p t �•:. t`'' "'' y°;�' A RJ24-1.12Pla}'Space Pack a uanetyoifugpl:ry=twenia in ;i ' r?;lttlttr' a snrall area. An e_wvilent choice Y « t Yy wht're space is tinLted. � y � �. ;"Q.11 pr,t3rr=.vut�-d.g�3q•. mzttt ,,tctl tuhu,g forrm 1 Jam" .• «ILa.nIC3,p'M-dt•rt-twlealsted rs • _'' I rtur( ,t' �� _ • 45" e4wre TendetTuff., l_led elvel tI �r f 1 • t w'�'', Urck ut 421 Hgh 1 {� +'OM1�,,,�� � 2' • AD ut idO corpnrumb dyrh�f Area requited:::' x:i ?' k 3'Whigh. fit} l.it>! idit? 4ttU+YttSY=`i 017- 5000 Series Swings A standard swing unit designed for Playgrounds that get lots of use. Two seats per beam make it safer.than a three seat unit. Tripod -type end sup. ports make the frame very rigid. • 2%"UD.pouderraoatedsdr.40pipebeatn • 2%—O.D. gahwdzed steel legs • Unique aluminum compression damping yokes • Galvanized malleable iron hanger with o8 impregnated bearings • Cil st Wit link chain • Blum Wed, skrsh-proof belt will See page 112 for other types of seats available. ib+viiratr s+ar�ra�i-dt�s: Exergtide Sent, Exesglides protide much more support and are great for upper body develop- ment. They eliminate "bailing out;' rear chain wrap and'side•to•side colli- sions. A rubber bumper on the rear provides added safety. Add them to either 5000 or MW Belies 6wltig frame% 6000 Series Hen q Duty $wings A heavy duty swing unit designed for areas of maximum use and abuse: • W0,11 pouderaxrued sch.40pipe bcam • 2%, 0, 1). ynhanized stect kTs •. Unique.aWmfnum compression d irripi rg ynkcs • Cahaniaed nukaW iron hanger with aJ u,pnegnated be ' • 4,'0 stmight link chain • Blunt tied, ala::h puuflA eezts ' See page 112) for iAher types of seats m-aable. 70 landscape Structures Model No, Na Area Conk—tion Na iSwlngs Sections Helot Required /Ij[jj� 845-5623 2 1 81 28' x 25' EN 845.5123 2 1 v 32' x 26' 8455843 4 2 8' 28' x 36' . 845-5143 .4 2 10' 32'x 38' A(Isuonpanaraifab44h 7?We4WroaW dhaimSOAmw LmOscup 9n tum'ninurs- taRn ferDnrisa Model _ Nu No, Area ConfitpwNon. No, Swings Sections Heflin Required 8456123 2 1 1it' 25' x 32' 8456223 2 1 12' 27' x 36' AZ845-61333 1 10' 26' x 32' 845.6= 3 1 12' W x 36' 11 ( 8456143 3 4 2 10' 36' x 32' I r , 9ML43 4 2 12' 37' x 36• f 8456163 6 2 10' 43'x32' 1 845.063 6 2 12' 44'x 36' AU daiwer anrrnt:c:✓ eci:h 71 .fr.7itgaasd daiw. Sapxr tmeixa� $hwtr+m` r�rn. twn�r F+t+inY• 1'"1 1310 41 1 289.80809 Frill Bucket Sent Molded of a high-grade, durable rubber compound. Vandal -resistant spring steel reinforcing. Safer. heavy galvanized steel connectors prevent pinched fingers. 289.8080211a118ucket Seat Open front aPaws toddlers to climb in turd out by themsches. blulded of a high-grade rubber compound. iandabresista x spring steel reinforcing. Gahanacd steel connec- tum and safety chain. 289.80805,11olded Contour Seat' hlade of lightweight, rigid U.V. stabilized polyethylene. SuW galvanized steel con- nectors instead of chain prevent pitched fingers. 289.80803 Stash-Pnaf Belt Seat' hlulded of a high•grade, durable rubber contp.wnd, Steel cable reinf inbtgand solid stool encapsulated end plitca deter tand.ds. Specially molded edges fumt a Ltunt. intpact•ahsutbing perimeter. Eserghtle Sent Rouble pendulum action pemtits seat to oavelonly in a straight path. Excellent exercise for upper body development and tinting. Swung hangers not included, 847.88M4 For 8' high beam 847.81'X4 For 14' high beam y 289.80806 Flat tlloldedSeat• Molded of a high grade, durable rub- ber tontptnmd wvh a oot d atefor m, cncap :ulltcd rtinf„n rng pLttc for Wed t,trcngth and prueawn agaimt %andalt_m. Slk; Wuy tno!dededgeo f .mt a Uum, unpxt ahaorL R pcnmctcr. '7tu i b 4 aqui k slop uent, V = 06 Is w Du Mar, Inc. C 10DEL 50 BENCH Fwr rnacslve bar, of 5' - Ihrtk smel support thin heavy timbered bertch,nnd form arm. re. •ln trial do riot lesson the u5able',rmlmq Spnen. MATERIALS Slim4"v 4' nem in choice of Claw All llearl, Flee of Heart Center netlwood or Clem Dnrfgl'39 ( h vlln clear prr..orxnuve Supnotm 5'd' • Y pmol Or Fact S1rno9 1.a" • r steel bar Cerilm Contour. Strap 2� ,tt—1 bar f-i-wnpiT 'o :10atemr dnmla,9 AteO scross Fimt,h Brcnrr nnamel REDWOOD BENCHES olk 1941P H 'pCA abnrq wr 2n] th9 qg FVVG' Irrnq bench, wt 314 Ibn •OUGLAS FIR BENCHES )WD 6' lcno bnnrh wl 2-931M 50-Ji9D B' Innq hench, wt 114 IN') G Chown nnrlwnnd or Dnmon F•r' 1.111; co-ftne with',tePl prpn 5utgtnrl6 in "-,moa bench mal m monomlcal and (1urum,) MATERIALS Slate 2` • 4• rvnn m ehmrre rel Clem All Hnmt_ Fnnt of I Inert rentor nom6ttrtu ffr Clear Douma9 Fu with clear prnr('nnlrv- SupporPo 21., () 1) :Incl p'pn Fa9lc+rnm- •,.' Arnmele, pl'»Ir4 camnoe bolts rrnt.b BmarP nnam-1 REDWOOD BENCHES it 8mi 6 hong henrh 2 qucrm'lo All 89 tri. 31 Fnn A' long t—mti, 1 vurrvim dl ls0 Ilya DOUGLAS FIR OENCNES 31 1-z'110' Innl)_l �nnl 2 .uppnna wf n'.� 41a a, Sita 9' long hnnrit 7 a frrrn .t.1, 120 lba SUPPORT OPT/ONS 6•1 Gmbopmr nl R.9 Sunarn ,nea bub Ffno, Council Agenda - 8/13/90 13. Consideration of the purchase of used Vac -All. (J.S.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: During the budget sessions last year, City staff made it known to Council that we were looking at the possibility of purchasing a combination sewer jet and vac within the next year or two. Our jet truck is 18 years old, and the jet unit itself is approximately 9 years old but still in good operating condition. There has been a need for a vacuum unit to work with the sanitary sewer department for some time. We have utilized the nurse unit from the wastewater treatment plant, but it is not a full-time vacuum machine and is not as appropriate for the use as a combination jet/vac would be which provides constant vacuum. We contacted some dealers in the Minneapolis area for prices on this unit and found out they cost in the area of $140,000 to $150,000. At the same time, a dealer, Boyum Equipment from Lakeville, Minnesota, pointed out that many cities use a separate vac with the jet and find many other uses for the vac in the area of streets, wastewater treatment plant, parks, and the like. This dealer indicated that the City of Worthington, Minnesota, was trading in an older, 13 -yard Vac -All that was in good condition. He indicated that this unit would be available in the near future at a very economical price and would allow us to keep our jet for a few more years prior to deciding on a combination jet/vac or whether to stay with separate units. The dealer Indicated that he thought the rear engine on the Worthington Vac -All needed a rebuild, and he would discount the unit down to a price of $14,900 if we were interested. We discussed this possibility between the City Administrator, Water and Sewer Superintendent, and the Street and Parks Superintendent and felt this purchase should definitely be looked into. In late July, Matt Theisen and I went with representatives of Boyum Equipment of Lakeville to the City of Worthington to view the unit, check it out, and meet with City representatives. The City of Worthington representatives went Out of their way to demonstrate the unit to us and provide us with usage information and maintenance history. The City of Worthington was sold on the idea of having a separate VAC -All and jot, as they felt the Vac -All was used just as much in the street, park, and wastewater treatment plant, as it was working on lift stations and cleaning of sanitary and storm sewers. They indicated during the fall season they cleaned as many as 200 catch basins a day and that the unit was extremely handy in vacuuming materials during water main breaks and evon Cstump grinding programs. They were trading the unit in while 21 Council Agenda - 8/13/90 it was in reasonably good condition so they could get a high trade-in value. On paper, the City of Worthington received $21,000 for the unit; and it appeared that Boyum Equipment had been misinformed about the rear engine needing an overhaul. The tact was the the rear engine had been overhauled recently and was In good condition. Matt and I looked over the unit extremely well and wrote an evaluation report on the unit. The unit is in service now and could be put in service by the City of Monticello with no repairs whatsoever. It is recommended that a minimum of $1,570 worth of repairs be done over the winter to put it in excellent operating condition and an optional repair of $1,070 be considered for a new silencer/muffler on the unit so it would be quieter when working in residential areas. Boyum Equipment has informed us that this unit will not depreciate in value; and if kept in reasonably good condition for the next three to five years, we would receive our investment and possibly a higher figure back at the time we decide to sell outright or trade. We also have a $2,000 credit coming from Boyum Equipment due to a problem with the last snowplow unit we purchased a couple years ago. Therefore, the amount needed for this purchase would be $12,900. We have sufficient funds in the capital outlay budget for this purchase, or the fund could be split between departments based upon the estimated usage. A sheet depicting this usage is enclosed for your review. One thing that should probably be pointed out is the difference between this type of a vacuum and the nurse unit that we have at the wastewater treatment plant. The vacuum unit at the wastewater treatment plant can only reach atmosphere pressure vacuum and has the capability to pull material from 15 feet to 20 feet at best. The vacuum only lasts for a few seconds, and then the unit has to be stopped and vacuum built up again. Suction hose sizes are 4 inches to 6 inches. The Vac -All, on the other hand, is continuous vacuum similar to a vacuum cleaner. The blower generally has a capacity of 12,000 cubic feat per minute at velocities reaching 175 mph and develops a vacuum of not less than 48 Inches of water negative pressure. This unit uses hose sizes from 8 Inches to 12 inches and will generally have the capacity to pick up a 100 -pound sandbag at depths exceeding 40 feet. it is sot up to suck liquids, semi-solids, and also dry material. The nurso unit at the wastewater treatment plant sucks only liquid materials and is not very maneuverable being a tri -axle extremely long truck. The Vac -All unit iLsolf is a single axle and a very maneuverable unit. Some pictures are enclosed of Worthington's unit and others. 22 Council Agenda - U/13/90 L B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to authorize the purchase of the Vac -All from the City of Worthington through Boyum Equipment for the amount of $14,900 utilizing the existing credit at Boyum Equipment of $2,000 and use the capital outlay fund for $12,900. 2. The second alternative would be not to consider purchasing the used Vac -All from the City of Worthington but to continue with plans to purchase a combination jet/vac unit. This option does not appear to be in our best interest at this time, as the City may decide to have separate units in the future such as the City of Worthington. 3. The third alternative would be to do nothing at this time but to continue as we are using a pail and rope and the nurse unit from the wastewater treatment plant from time to time and clean our catch basins by hand. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the City Administrator, Public Works Director, Street and Park Superintendent, and the Water/Sewer Collection Superintendent that the City Council authorize the purchase of this used Vac -All from the City of Worthington via Boyum Equipment in the amount of $14,900. City staff feels this is the best alternative for the City at this time, and the full investment in this piece of equipment will bo returned to the City at time of trade or sale. City staff has looked for other used similar pieces of equipment of this size at other equipment dealers and found none available. C D. SUPPORTING DATA: Evaluation report; Boyum Equipment quotation; Pictures. 23 EVALUATION OF CITY OF WORTHINGTON VAC -ALL July 24, 1990 I. 1971 Ford 8,000 truck chassis 1. 19,194 miles. 2. 429 engine with 5-2 exc. condition. Clean oil, starts and runs exc. 3. Paint: white in good condition. 4. Tires: 10:00 X 20 hwy front 6 traction rear, near new. 5. Brakes: Air, rebuilt in 1989. 6. Cab exc. condition, good glass, no dents or cracks, small worn spot in seat. 7. No visible leaks in radiator, engine, transmission, or differential. II. 1971 Vac -All Model E-5-13 Catch Basin Cleaner, paint good 1. Waukesha 6 cyl. gas engine exc. condition. Approximately 1,645 hours on overhaul in 1983. Uses very little oil, battery weak. 2. Blower: new bearings and rebalanced at McQueen in 1990. 3. Box Hoist: Power up 6 power down exc. condition; no leaks 4. Hose Boom Hoist: Hoist exc. condition; no leaks; boom bent but usable. 5. Box: Needs some welding on top and now screen supports and one drain baffel. Not critical, in fair to good usable condition. 6. Tailgate in exc. condition; latches are good. May need new gasket in future. 7. Rear hose 6 SS swivel, swivel is now. Hose in fair to good condition but short. was cut off in past. Should be replaced in future, but usable as is. VAC-ALL.EVL: 7/24/90 Page 1 8. Wash down tank, pump, hose, and nozzle. Not demonstrated but informed by City that all were in good condition. 9. Silencer: Cracked and in need of repair. Usable without, but should be repaired in future to reduce noise levels. 10. Piping: Three 8' x 1211, two 4' x 12", One 4' with offset x 1211, one 6' x 12" bottom section, one 12" x 8" adapter, and one vacuum attachment. 11. City of Worthington will give all miscellaneous parts such as filters, etc., with the machine. III. Summary The chassis is in excellent condition and needs no repairs. The Vac -All unit is in fair to good condition and is usable as is. Approximately $1,570 worth of repairs would put the unit in good operating condition and could be done during the winter season. The silencer has not been used by Worthington. It would cost an additional $1,070 to put the silencer in like -new condition. In summary, the unit is well worth the $14,900 and should last up to five years with no major problems and would not depreciate In value. On paper, Worthington received $21,000 trade-in for the unit. A good investment for the City and would put off the need to purchase a combination jet/vac for several years. A combination unit would cost $140,000 to $150,000. C VAC-ALL.EVL: 7/24/90 Page 2 0 t� A C ESTIMATED USAGE Department 8 Usage Cost Appropriation Streets 308 X 14,900 = i 4,470 Parks 58 745 Tree 108 1,490 Water 158 2,235 Sewer 308 4,470 WWTP 108 1,490 TOTAL 1008 $14,900 VAC-ALL.EVL: 7/24/90 Page 3 0 C VAC -ALL REPAIR PARTS 1. Rear hose $ 1,000.00 2. Rear door gaskets 107.84 3. Hose boom 400.00 4. Silencer: top ret ss $ 594.72 bot ret ss 202.24 large foam 228.72 small foam 42.72 1,068.40 5. Porthole gasket 61.00 TOTAL $ 2,637.24 VAC-ALL.EVL: 7/24/90 Page 4 I 7780 • 215 St. West ]UOTATION Lakeville, Minn. 55044 L. ORDER 612-469-5650 MUNICIPAL & CONTRACTOR EgUIPMENT To Citv of Monticello Sheet 250 East Rroidwav, Rnx 1147 City 8 Slate _.rnnr ire"! In. MN SS167 For Mr. .lnhn Simnla Address Expected Chassis Arrival Data TnUCK MAKE I YEAR I MODEL I W.O. I C.A. Date ,duly 5. ICIQ0 Roq. By Terms Territory Rah Larsen P.O. No. Phone Number 1-Jo5-7711 TRANSMISSION I TIRE SISE•RE P.O. No. CITY. UNIT NE' 1 1971 Ford 8,000 Truck Chasis with 429 C.T. Gas Engine 5-2 Transmission 19,000-20,000 actual miles with: 1 1471 VAr-All Mntlel r -S-13 rarrh Basin Cleaner Powered by a Waukesha gas engine. Unit has a 12" rear vacuum hose with 20-301 12" oioe (Waukesha engines burn oil) Total Price 518,500 OC rush niarnnnr S 1.Finn of Total $14,900 Ot 'rhiw —ir i4 hainarr� ,d,ui-in — If— rirv, of Wnrrhinnrnn —A was purchased by them new. OI SCLAIMEAS Any worranll0. on the produCll Solo no,dby nro those of the lanulaclut Or. Ae between this ,atoll editor and buyer, all ploCucts ale sold In on AN Ill Conoo-, IN., 111. as the duality Ono patiormanCo O1 Iho P'Oducl Is with the buyal. So., OOOS OsprOssly rOlrAln lion, making any lepr000ntallpm b,.1"antles, end does hvl uu' .,. •. any and ell wOftenIios. esptoll or Implied. INCLUDING ANY IMPLIeO WAnnANTY OF MERCHANT AGILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAn PVRPO%E. •' e,I Ing 1, In statute, COmmOn law. Cullom dr alhefwise, The famody Sol IO,th In this agreement Shall be the esCl Ysive rem Ody available to any pWson. Ifu y.�, —'•. sumodly to bind IM eollar IO any soprooniclon Ot wetronly other than this olaClalmot. This 4I9CI■IM01 by this inlet In no way effects the aims W in, u.. o„L... wouAnry. The sellur shall not be liable to, any COn,OQllan[let damdgoO fdsulling dem the Use 01 this ploducl of Caused by any OSIOCI. tabule or mtl WnClmn vl ., whealof a Claim lot Such damage la baled upon wafronly. Contract. llagligonce Or olhafa•IIe. Tho buvoe acknow10og01 doing mloolnoo oI Ind Obeva die Clalm Or pyla 101010. DuyW10,11nn1,„d X MINNESOTA SALES TAX MUST DE ADDCO OR TAX EXEMPTION CEn TIPICATC run NIsIIED ACCEPTED: CUSTOMCR.............................................................................................. DY............................................................. DY............................................................................................................................................................................. ws ,lsw„ W rips, r1,M,Ns Wlil, w110e1,1 MW s. tin Wise b sflsll sl We, 11 eleve,e .1e Wlvla MIwIIMMwaMg Na Mlsle U1wA A„sln )See Terms and Conditions on Reverse Side) Ullo While • 0111CO Copy Canary • Customer Copy. Pink . SAIesmOn Copy . �3 k� SAM TAX :T AVA I TOTAL All Claims and rowned goods MUST be accompanied by this bill. 21" LASINC 28824 feedfly ew�ttcre,4 fe!9Z .-.RE AMA (I J3 Atil)[RSON ;T LIGNIANT SERVICE RAMI & FRONT ENsirvict "rREk STIAIGHUNMIDD& &AL^NOMG COWLITI MOTOR TUNE UP .1 umv strwta V\ Phone 316-4744 Sao 9th St. "NS WORTHINGTON, MINN. 36187 "Yoult SAFETY IS OUR ILGINESS" TQLIW-- CuLtoftw's Order N, - Nom. Addrv, ( SOLD Or CASH C. O. D. AC- ON C7 R�, f ww It1 otsc"I'VIO's "KI AMOUNT , -'I —47 XX 1� SAM TAX :T AVA I TOTAL All Claims and rowned goods MUST be accompanied by this bill. 21" LASINC 28824 feedfly ew�ttcre,4 fe!9Z .-.RE AMA (I J3 /97/ F �� S1.2 sr, As C13) MIUNESOTA MACHINE POPULATION MODEL CITY. Date ES -13 W/Rt. Sweeper City of Alexandria 1976 E 5-16 American Pipe Cleaning, Minneapolis 1963 ES -16 City of Austin 1962 E 5-16 W/Sweeper City of Austin 1973 ES -13 W/Sweeper City of Blaine 1977 E 5-16 City of Bloomington 1969 E -10B City of Bloomington 1975 E5-13 W/Sweeper City of Chisholm 1974' E 5-16 W/Sweeper City of Duluth 1973 ES -16 Village of Edina 1971 ES -13 W/Sweeper b Flusher Fergus Falls 1975 ES -16 Village of Golden Valley 1969 ,E5-16 W/Dual Sweeper Hennepin Co. 1976 ES -13 W/Sweeper Hibbing 1973 E -10A Hutchinson 1978 E5-13 City of Jackson 1975 ES -13 W/Sweeper City of Marshall 1973 ES -16 City of Grand Forks 1962 ES -16 W/Sweeper City of Minneapolis 1971 E5-13 W/Dual Sweeper City of Minneapolis 1974 ES -16 City of Moorhead 1962 E5-16 Moorhead Construction 1974 ES -13 City of New Hope 1975 E -10A City of Owatonna 1976 ES -16 City of Richfield 1973 E5-13 City of Robbindal.e --*-VjrjJL *jM 1974- E5-16 Village of Roseville 1971 E5-16 W/Sweeper City of Shoreview .1975 ES -13 W/Sweeper City of Spring Valley 1974 ES -16 St. Louis Park 7 ES -13 W/Sweeper City of Virginia 1974 ES -13 City of Worthington 1970 �VrACUUMS CATCH BASINS 1 '_j Iql COLLECTS AND HAULS LEAVES ASSISTS ON WATER MAIN BREAKS REMOVES WATER AND LOOSE DIRT PICKS UP HEAVY STREET SWEEPINGS REMOVES SLUDGE FROM DRYING BEDS (STREET FLUSHER EQUIPMENT. (OPTIONA WIDE STREET POWER FLUSHING !! T.K .i. A �. ..,` 1 , �,'N � r ,'moi .�• � _.,moi' . � �"•-��:,1'. *-b uy jYOP *'�'J.v:;' iV�i�Rt f5'" ,: ht '"9i�1• t+ `yj� . µi LNi.''1i k. „'►3jt� i i 1tJ t T •t �t'P ' iil' !� �' �e . 4 •� e i �• t� i F,i~ �''1 �1•. rv41 r t �..I �'+I.w:1 ,. }J i i' � _{ � ��i�.74s '�. �N�* + � •t �y,f l , ��,jR}'�i } '�+�Y .t, :1 #'y � � ��^'-.�lfi �jttg4 .J'i 11i 4yq.ti t , 1 ' • . loom il H�4 I'd j r#. .CINTRAI EX CEMIRAL EN5ENEEWNG COMPANI INC wr 4 Council Agenda - 8/13/90 14. Consideration of purchasinq property adiacent to city hall. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: In June, the Council was made aware that a parcel of land within the city hall block adjacent to and abutting our present city hall property was av&ilable for sale by the Wright County State Bank. The parcel is described as Lot 2 except the west 10 feet, and Lot 3, Block D, which fronts on Third Street to the south and the city hall property on the north. The lot size should be 122 feet along Third Street by 165 feet deep and contains an older residential structure with a detached double garage. Wright County State Bank has foreclosed on the property, and they have indicated a willingness to sell the property to the City for future expansion needs. The property may have some advantages to the City if we were ever interested in providing another access from Third Street to our parking lot. With the City's recent acquisition of the property directly south of our existing parking lot, our parking lot could be expanded in the near future even without purchasing the bank's property. But the additional space would allow the City to square off its property more. Another advantage may be that the City could keep a portion of this bank property and possibly still be able to sell the residence separately. The staff has not analyzed whether this Is possible; but in viewing the property, there may be options available to the City along this line. The Wright County State Bank has obtained an appraisal from Maxwell Realty which places the property value at $55,000. Bank officials have also done an in-house appraisal where they fool the property is worth $58,900. It is my understanding that the bank would be willing to consider a reasonable offer in this neighborhood of $55,000 to $59,000 if the City was interested. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Council could direct staff to prepare a purchase agreement at whatever amount you fool is appropriate. Council could determine that the acquisition of the property Is not necessary at this time. 24 C Council Agenda - 8/13/90 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: While it appears that the City has adequate property at this time to expand its parking lot and to even allow for an expansion of our present building, there certainly may be advantages to owning additional land. It is assumed that the best time to acquire a property is when it becomes available rather than finding out later we need additional property; but if the need is not there for a long time, it's not always a good idea to buy it too early. The idea of extending an access to Third Street does not appear critical for our parking lot expansion, but it is very possible that the City could buy this property and keep a portion of it and still sell the house. Of course, in the meantime, the City could rent the residence to help defray our holding cost. While the staff does not have a firm recommendation, the addition of this property under City ownership could provide more alternatives for parking lot and/or building expansion possibilities in the future. SUPPORTING DATA: Map of city hall block indicating location of parcel; Copies of appraisal. 25 I I? FZICS, T :S A T- FZ ]-=: V (:> I=Zr C,jner/Occupant: ii4k-, YL u e q4 - kJA) Loan: S Property Address' C--a.J- 3AJ 2' County: City: MOA"'(10 state: MI,Zip Code: Legal-Discription: 2- � 25 /dam D. Dfra W site Size: improve.ments/Uti I i ties: KPublic Private •_ Land Use: Residential -commercial -Agricultural P # of un4ts:Design (style): Year Built: Grade: --52 FETA Flood Hazard: -Yes rl- No F7 -'.,Lk Map/Zone AT, W - Analysis: (G=Scod, A=average, F=fair, P=;cor) Quality of Construction: A ccndit;on of imprcvements: Quality of Improvements: A: Marketability: Estimated Values* TOTAL et&Dwelling: 952 square feet @ S 22.&-- + 2 1 - Garage: 8t9 square feet @ S + 0 0 0. Other- Gf(. square feet @ $ + 1.6 Other, + Extras: + Potches/ Patios etc. 32Q A 4 + 100 - Site Improvements: + Lot Value: + Sub Total* Less Depreciation: TOTAL VALUE: ZS J"q. We herety Certify that to the test of cut- kr.cwled=e and telief t -e facts and data used herein are t= --.:e and correct: t!:a- we ;ersz:.-aI-*-:, inspected the sutlev: pra;erty and that we 1 -.a -,e no ur.discllcsad interest, present or prospective therein. Date: y a 12, Appra-isal Cc:: ittee r ma ..�L ..lG.:z.sarnld SS36? mac.. /erJ res-.xsrn July 2, 1990 Mr. Dale Lungwitz, Pres. Wright County State Bank 106Pine St-reet Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Mr. Lungwitz: .tea /err/,sff-e�rs� Re: Residence at 213 East 3rd Street, Monticello Minnesota 1 I have appraised the property at your request, located at 213 East 3rd l Street in Monticello, Minnesota. You requested that I divide the value • betvicen the front half of the lot with the house, and the rear half with the garage. I would allocate the $55,000.00 value as follows: The residence and front half: $38,000.00 The garage and rear half: $17,000.00 In my opinion. the topography and elevation does not lend itself to this division. The only prospective purchaser, on the rear half, would be the city for increased parking. This would require dirt removal and install- ation of re tein ing wells. It would be much bettor if they purchased the Whole property which would give them access to 3rd Street as wall as Palm Street. Thank r giving me this opportunity to be of sorice. 41. 9RPA JEM/pkp Preperli LTeserbikr.A'Aaalrab UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL REPORT Fite" Nepolr AORM amara btr-t reset fame baa tOdXa DSMISAIARY USE Gtr- Itonticallo rm.y Wrlk%t Gia:o 111 2b Lim 55162 rel Was 5 terapeepntle Lot 2 lee. v'ly 10 6 Lot 3. Elk D, Tova of Monticello on. OaielOa%nn NriRht County State Bank Use RMeece lbvw Amass 1 Sas Se, Prte 1 Ilse 1110" ebeva avere0.a �FOUS ARI1A6t0 tbtppe TYR leen Naodrarsson m as pad elf . t ,9We Fe Se1M OXON Ibab aw Oma Gwasbs RE. Ia¢a 1 h. lea - 1414 STUD ltat - . P00 p Sawa 1 tnderOlea UTUIEX ROk pro - CadmidopwAsk) venter: Brian Brice— _ pe wiia RD Sane LMAleen Slalr01r1 OQ60.Om ANALYSIS va fo 9a BLU lP Ore 15% 2575% 75% Glabrneal Sae'7ftOenPATE Rapti St" Gseedera btevior.R PROCAIYVALIL$ evemYq Stade dr0 tomedera b 9dW5pOEM r WOISimY vatipe kl BdncalCavederal b &nal AMW IM I" U ds3AW 3BM. 6 kkre Adam, at P16Io li gawlwha t PRESENT LAND USE % LAM USE D"U ItIEDO MMM MA IMLV H=K FbiotA r ranter t r rw* Eo Na udp ®=MNLY1 act! M"I Adaimy a Uses 2•4 Fsa* Ladf Dme ® hm" carlmtay Y4tseoj a patty a 6tmd [] 40 lee 25 � ft.0.Mimdal feed CalslecW 8 Yaom 105%1 ® � BOW It6 ria Rmetbl erd,em Uses (M 5%)Q 55 PmwWel 45 Umea kveaao d Repetle y— _ Awes to Uses Nae Rdp a e, rs+M raaaeael q ae sepdaemod "as mmOmao ntuw apyrase banCO Y(TV Arca is a ml.tura of residential and cooercial. Older saction of the city. Cloea to dovntoien end shoppinM. Osueetee 122' a 165' GEURALOLSOBIW EXILWA M$UWI N rQf41ATIM P1"ap, 111Ah Sb Oro 20170 gft"re feet Coes Let no so ebeva avere0.a 2sse f�M B-4 Reps nal Eualneas 2antd Canpdo no ,9We ret tan0.0 ler 1TJZ51 a HSl U3 Pelw Ilse no Ode the covert lel Oaalp Rood UTUIEX ROk pro SITE A.ROVMNIS hTs Reek Pan Weer -goad NatoSum rks INee asphalt tadUaaka fair Gal Cowte vas Trapdoor to the Dept llhteN bin ah e" RTavot Msle Sksri none Atomel O eewds none SaMeY Beet Sees lips vee Ratio R W rood Rasa Ne' Na XX Steen leas � none Rd. Arr I71AA'UN110a WaiWaiY Orem be BN n.- ��� 00NRNTSIAWaw urate eatenmlL edfaetlsnmU, sp�al%eifasn. Mot matt ek► - . Elevetlon 4 foot above the street, moan treas. , i GEURALOLSOBIW EXILWA M$UWI N rQf41ATIM BAMMENI P&AAILN nkat 1 ralarmtlon atone cont SW Area 50 rt Sd® 11-112 Wab VMb vd . d� MBpeo 0 %fidaed O " IM t0"JAo) Real &Axes asphalt !I cellar Ceft -t Otabl($hrn 1 12 et:d"A INAV none "Me " 'sib floe — Cdpk, yes• Mtiawtype EEl.hun Daano.. n rks INee ' PMPOW Ede Sub tomb. sit DaYde Easy - Adeoo<.Y_ - this Grour"We seas' kdeWUsn Trapdoor to the Dept llhteN bin Ad(%1, it,vinoxt tlMout, cellar rUKKINs Ape(Mt! -30 -- - Ratio �M!yn. Ong„ Ae`aiel� Dee _Ir-a�ry_IM Rd. Arr Eearn: a or yes WaiWaiY Orem be BN n.- ��� LmM 1_-J� I �1e-�;7�I�1 95B - Less2 • I1- 2-1 I nvvd aN ass Reds rwdaae: Y RNeek ' ; esmwrYel 1 i 7 ntgl ` 6,nue rent M OnM lerL4ru SUN AUS sAaerasllerlema 11 Also UIOs.M1OW' AIRC 91alLNEas.NI ANLYdf- ' .An r M rk"aY 'line._ tarp._ y� _type .YAC M4e14 - Noe ow"Y d caN10MI _ _ _ MYa 8(0._4 -panel fool .Be• Argelorel ata11 Comm Go meP—M _ Rn,Ulwsk .pine Wsd1sl fetr_'0tpeaM Dgtlbe Raso&MAsreA = _ Ban ties no — - -_. AeeuleY yaa� Daee"s SUN also and Slap _ -11 " mm Rtv,tel-plaster��..� COONS ratlkoe floe feaw flbaap _ ODDS __ -� Carseat rereae Idled Ibaskll AsestrYa CadNM „pine wnu" rwr taarta-AQeY aA Cebear Ya, wsAdaa,e 111aiel r�ket Adgecv a fay te fw�reras� - no'-�_��i Adesa.Y—scus CaaaMadY eTledealeld - fM 110RAti Ga4 Uladad MOM Easy ksd"M [� Oe EmV Nil 7, i comet Iblen/ us CA's Cay Med a Uanasly 19.00R-ni, tdarF.Ida ! 3Q ' Mt ' f (ood e1w, A!NY (stator n essema r?y rwnkM Rw.*n Penna la ln�� Ma Aaardrmm-. Gare`e, • Q.rcltlon �_a,[rpc kid sed Mata-. f 1k9"w4v v"eat"ad Mash nellerM,krapna nte0et ��I„i irls�el�yd •ed InteriOr�e,ds—' n 1, _cunt of kitchen teasaltosLwl decoratlnd.-Nlnlwo ebtnpp_.- Nu a„ypar�i 4!Ij. - eds _ 0"9 -M waive ant pnwnoe ad -W1 In s llew"0 eM ads ayab Ise sMee4 elrW se'deala Nsrket conditions overage to Gtr. Inter,pt ratio dnlydbb. _ .�. ._.. .._ .... _. ... .. .�. �... .�.... ��.._.r." �..�.r .nay... .. ,� faWanaoa-11. UNIFORM RESIODMAL APPRAIULREPORr rua it. .- �n a1-T—Inwn�.bq ur411Mn e�lkbenn wrnw[w�6 w•.rr+aa F—I BEITRS 6.t1011S"M GREW LNIS AREA AMEGAAOE) ES IMATECEPRMLCTON C119 -MEW -OF IMPROVEMENTS, amt.om.srrr...... r•.w.sl r. e.mrr.am.mom.r..sm Dsfof I1/2 62%, Ask $48.00 -S 29850 - JisSQn.s630-00-_ -mow— Idna Seeks Eon EThoes bas . PapayPaa,,detk -V lI 0-JU iseQ— See Attached GMWIC.W'-819 Sq.Fte$10.00 8190 Mal EISNA s Cow IN.IN......................... . $ 49400 Rq%ICd RachaW E.1.0 OIwTIa LM 20000 I I -1 20000 .............. -S 29400 - Sn I'*•eYlalreay. rrsropkgs) -S 2000 ESTIMATED ETTE YA'IE ................ -6 24600 P Inggq III. oty reason. yW I "KATIa RIM 9VCM APPM1ea ..... .. -S 55800 00 Req.a6 of Foods Ux and fame MM) Corskurb unady L1 Y. V39 a Dab Paf.N a rkso r at*" 11011% Pamb slanninatT ❑a4 ®Me NamedInony"- aa.aWr Yould naod soca-rapefes and ffnbhlm W-mv Wale Egia work to qualify. n.r o.a.rpl•a w •un woof ma Iia tl.ao.is. r .ma. rarer m ruW ry ti mtme..s n s..urlr r.rla Ter maaonnam • amt r.,WYL.warGN�aa M1tin n amara. tl gynavr rNmblrrnb aaPr-r rutanmaatwil� I r pwW bm n rM r.+r..vw uanrv..+�wv mOaY M tm r4a t+.C.M1 • .vI. 1-a .>uMA • roar w.Cre b rIYI. W tl aW.l, e a Ywr.ra mpl n R Oml.iaa. ra.rr u 010• lay.eb M tr.ba] P®rr.r W I •1 OY�st. iNb. rbmlbe rm n1l.a -tlr tl b.ble EI COFAMaE MD (7AV.8AaE NO3 ITEM 9SECT OPNMOM 213 9 3rd St 741 YWBroadway 612 6th St Yea' 700 v Broadway Moes Monticello Monticallo Mone teal to Monticalfo RnnMy o_Sopn_ 5 blocks vest 8blacks at 9 blacks HH0estf li0ti Ace f k 56000 I 43000 ®Wlu�O S 55000 RUECrw 1. Aro f 40.50 CIS 45.60 Cl k_32.00 S 47.82 M -M O4 Swan MLS 26 days MLS 4_ days MLS 143 days wuuE AUSTIRMIS DESCRIPTION OESCAPTta I.IjIM-N TESWPTIN 1 •rn t.sa OEStli1Q1 I.alt Was SFIM . —F --Q t fine.. .0/0 1- 4000 EEA no pts 0 FRA pts 2295 Meal Sye/Trr 1- r9 I U March 941 U Fag -9U I U Ir[aafal �- Boo -R ' iqual y 0 InrWr obi ;+-6 fnrerlor I- ITT BaeN1s 122s161_ood "ii169 ♦ 000_ 66416LS-d + 7200 66..165 Int + 6200 - Elm A'S "- fel! equ.l 0 ljual 0 "uparinr - 2000 OAMy IT G -I" fair tele _ 0 Paque 0 .qu�l__� 10 eld-re. 1 0 oldea 1 0 bid -reams_, old -tea. 1 0 Zr � Qwz fair ""parlor 000 jjperinr 2000 suup.rl.r I- 5000 AIMGrave WY—. 1 �tY .Yb• M ass CAM 1 ]30 1(, 7_ - 2 W Now. ft - 200 _per < + 100 , + 300 " ll lt61,U i__ 13S8�ISLfl 1228 eWR .♦ 1100 11_44— so IT, 100 1150_ 640 +_ 500 Smuts 1 rndM � Rtes BMs Goes Foilllar— psrefal IOOO�pare lel �- 10011 pgttfel 1000 (JCIrW MMj� avereQ„ay.rag. -V ev1raea 0 pygr.m-D 1rtltlgltadt'® FA jams PA `ae OALRA a 0 Ms.$ 0 "VM.a�rl-�, 2`ar_da__t= ■yl_deto It Oq nonce_ i♦ 6000 nanGL 1+ 6000 ft*. ftLhIL O' dock cloud porch - 2500 CT 600 CF 60L' Rall. ea: v��--��. -r✓�-w,��-_. .-� Eka°If�' none nose 0 oke. 0 IT Ca CA.ne bre r alastMq_ �' -. none ---- n -7 -----. no r j -�0 nana� 7 0 none f.• •Oiler tas Whir Door kltctnn appl Fences 600 aypitaneo :- 300 appliances ��900 00.(amsad ) cabinets e.blossa -__400 ualn.to - _ 40n eghtnal■ - 4H0 400- - -•1 10900- 805 �W r Saw 1. 55600 k 54100 53805 r.fteaasa Sys[hawsm. _Cow urebles ata �Il�darrerdelad_hoffe slol]at to_ths !lubj9EL -_- _-- -but _on les.-lane-.nd_!_n_eettlr_{9nd3.lLn. C4gi-I!Wmote o`-vol-e- OIC4Tuwe v gull CBBMfW aggaCsF - '--� _-.-_� ^- --- ,-`-45}om -- = MUTOfAla vItdAWANUMalaf4OL'Wl faanra moldAMC---� _ M.GMMRankVAPW. --_*1 U- - IM y.MW a eua 1(41"11 esatl r er are arrelgaras a we+ra molt. I - 1 con” an Pa ars am $Mama. Cavern ace C.draaAM.". Cr..t!et w9IEbs JlYN-4l;! MErkel Pltg ApprQerbr-IlOC BupetsHlJstd�=_ by the Cost-Appr_og"t. raw ewfaawan • /- ins QPP-0. I se w. as ere na.a -va, No t.Aaaaa.iftsiai N Monwo Mala. M UNho Nat aa.rra OWN. sae. - fra614 n0 Ha M laoeeq l rarh mea 1" Fa A. 1E811,00ft M. rens too fRat MIT Ir ala an n [ Isawass 1 lot IfROn in w11l11 fun, M anus. v to M1E91 MRPV 418 .lung g}- - '1190. aY1,"1000a00 1M11.Yy Wasatad Isl ra.rai WNW a./VONBNnadewe swk..NM.40 W lt.sltrsa.►. Ww ftsiw~l. kaR.aal1 ass...e. r nayrkeq d d u.P.Y tall ave w s aap.l. es Y I lar) aaw m raa.aas awe r Pawaan ,Fein AE�.wWI .rani Agar Axasls s poW ,"unt rd [ I la am m1 Nwriel Wr�Rawer ' . Ice. M'If1n I.11l rt • I.nuM.m.wwaa•eaeMaaw aY•aw�i llaMrl apl NlrMa �. Irw Yel..w 4rJ ..w PHOTOGRAPH ADDENDUM S Oil FRONT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY REAR OF SUBJECT PROPERTY STREET SCENE 'KADDITIONAL PHOtOGAAMS ON A EVE11511 GIOr. Irv) GAK V1ta„�. 0 Cl MAP SKETCH ADDENDUM 77--T c.." u)ffv�m-r L�'C— WeLjf, MT GJAt rq STW Tac RAAJ& BUILDING SKETCH amy _IL'' lffx* LOCATION MAP -1 -SUBJECT PROPERTY), "Wy , -, M-Bm"Vwp.r 2m "N' FW-10WI0M1A ra /�PHOTOGRAPH ADDENDUM pmnm'Cllenl l.{ RICo}(1 LD1JNTy=T.A Tr' FS IJ Nlf �nemen 213 3.Ko_.ri%J2ti.•� r EsICY ulr Iy�NTIC.r Lfe•• �r I.I2I r:HT 61eu MN Ia toes ierdm COMPARABLE SALE *$1I COMPARABLE SALE N2 COMPARABLE SALE NJ (a ADDITIONAL PI101 OGRAPHS ON IIEVERSE SIDE lw07C. 1n;u.1 •1P1.tam..M Nben• 1. 71lu oll.e lMIYA1.Q.NI1 7.1.N110 e.m•111:10 /� MONITION OF AIARAICf VAI.OFs The axon makable grim .4ich a fats;"y dw.M Wall to . ewapmklm and Ipt. ...Lei adv .0 noulkl nx ragaidw to a Gir site. the 6.yn oad •elk, cath aohsg Mo kmty, k. -la c ably am ._Mh g The prk. 11 too Jwsud ty .Nue dimakt. Inplkk in this dd61nkm Is rte ctunwnnmon to .lain n rot a genimd dao and the paling of filk roma ¢Oar . h.M unkr mwdkkms whereby& t ti Sam and .0. am q'pk.gy nwfiacd; f2) bath parties .m call id—d .o sill talvied. aM each acting M .kyt be crmokk. bi..msl hot Sanaa: 471 u mauseahw time is Jhnmd far wo som in ds .pen mater, tot paynestt is made In aria .f C.4 I. Us. &onus no is won, d Or .w on— cna:ats asgatabla Ibmiu: and til the Tarim mplOCna &e larmal mosidrntklrl to am pn,peny NAd a1alGYle4 by •t -W w Mall- tinawiog .a Zak .-rakes- g,.Wrd by aryl& —Lund .0h th sols, rAdjurwmms to the vwnw-w.ka mots be made for spaial as crestlm ruaaiq w aaln ttwra:kaa, No djMlrems was rete.sup for taw calfs uhkh arm exactly paid by w%rM n . mash of endkioo or h v hs . v arttt i ma: these case, am madly kkWWI*k sine the miler M. these vias to v'i, d IT salsa amozlkw. filarial a cmaahe financing djuarreaa cam be owde m ilia —4w-ble pmspcify by n.uwiinms M firwachrg +era. alk d by a tbinn tatty mnicawaol nooks that Is nal ahmady ia"s d in ft prtpeny m tmmactiw, Any dj.nrtva s%MM can he ialcukwd am a atcla.ka4 &drat It. dollar cal d tib fmsiairrg .. cuaccukm bol the &filar nmmue d any adjvsmm damld alp tai nm, the awake'. ronkn —he fwaiq or C -.Sms bash m 41e.4pmi.cra judgnwW. CERT IFICAPON AND STATFAIEN'r OF LIMITING CONDITIONS CF.RTIL7CA1 ION. TheAppraiser «IdfKl W agmes tho' 1. Thr Appaler has M pexin or cdacmptMd futam kae" in Ow pwony "Woudwilt and nek7er the tm0mau.t as mate the apgn'aiwl. IMI the Compensation 6a k, is "in" upw the gVmi d value d if* pm(eny 2. tae Aptmaitcr Isis m I.—I iawrw I. m Has .kh 0— m the s.dga.Y numeral the •ivroisJ repo. or A. panki. Too. Its IT, sale. The-PAirmw d Muth Wet" in it. q+{maial mp.n is w houd in ah.le w in pan unto the race. odor. or MierW .nig- d she prost oive won ar'—pant. d the palmy aploahed, as qan de nm... a nrtbsu) ..nil N me Toren tura .m mupms d the pnpcilm, in the t kinky of the pmWny apprised. 7. the Appa4ter has pe—Ily :myfarrd the ptlfrty, laom inide and asa. sial Iwo .ask as cstYnm i.%wiin of .0 Ovagouhk ask. 7iued in fir nVms. Th Ito Ica rd ib Appaiart trwWr id Wirt. a0 samneas val in4mnwiun in gds mpw was I- and anmc,t. coal Ihn MTowoer has ns kmw6gly vrkhheal I" aignikam kkawouon. t. An t.00riaycw and toubig to ditkm am cviv.ined hemie twipmc(I f7 thw lean a the asaigmem w ly it. awls-• sipncd athci,ap the aM)ses, Minions. and i Wt kon taaired in the mry.). !. IN, appawt P. ha. been minae In no.hmmay akh .0 h -two . it. rcyuim.rea..4 IM C.ok a phdrnnnal Ijh- and Sta"O. Id Ih..ks.huui C.oaAct . f IM aw—I urpnirukow —h wh.h nam Apr ......fbfiamd. 6. All ~.k.w mal IvinkM! canxmiry IS, ml Naw ma am we kmh in o e rglaaisd alp. sem pmpwed ty the Appaiocr .hoe signwuar gram m the apprwiol miaw, aaku indicated as "Rik- Appmhet.^ Na chPotgr M say ima ha thin wppnital olail still bd main ty nyra aha Chad An Appalur• aa! ale Appraiser shall lone w msp.mihilky 6m stay such traaNlMkrd ch.nge. COh71Nl:bh'r AND LIAIi I1Nt: CONDITIONSi The cenifkukn adds Ammius ion i ulltg 1. IIn glo.iaol alai It wlyni to the hdlntug -WHMas Pool M srch Whet ytecirk W limiting cnatkkms more as Urrlh by the Appmier 44 iM Mp.m. 1. The Appaicr noxi as m.pwdbiloy Aa moll— of • kpl Mum silk kip the prtpeq aphorised iv the Ikk Ihrm• In, tan dors Ihw Apprala? wooer way tpiaiw as m (be tate, &6th To swore l In be pall any uwkaWa. The paperty is Mnised wl thla;h alskt Ielpanilde uaw hip, 2. Ag wk -eh in dal at -Pat may dew IMMis a , dwolalost and 1. kahlded b aunt the rads, Its vluailrky the pall• eny, the A4Mmdwl hos stank an survey of The pnpcny, 7. 1t. AfvrAoc# it Int Minkil 0 gtw wsthtl.ay Por nisty in own ti"^w of hyrltg mob dal wppawhw "To mwrcmtr b Uwe pnpcny k wwrtkal, ulna wmyrmrtu here ban 4aarlwdy mak Uemkw, a. Any i ituWinn d Ow oiluwlkw In the rental hely«s lead real Impm•enaa s of"- wdy adh she etidiiy pn%mns td ailbatkds, the wino nafa tahaham Ras ked and bolding mm a ad to used to .wjubdkn wilb any alwl gTaand and am inohd if w ad. S. The Apparrr awwief dal them ata on, bi&ka to vnwppma cwdkhu d the pmpny, ass elf, a emcimcs, atn b Mild «eke It sawn or leu olooble, Iho Appnhrf sawflin an roptaagdlky as such mondkk®. in bas engirccailTg Which sated To mopdad to diwm" rack facawa. C lahanuakw, edkwus, ad opletan tarnished M the Appolatr, .M nanism in ink mpn; swam t hah d Sian laorcea coaskknul miklae .ad telkwd k* he tar mat eatmi, lltasater. ma rnpws%ilky Win acwM d wwh itemn, fwaishwl the AM,Aiw (.a Its anumed by Tho Appalmt, 7. Uidbsum of The teroews at ma app alul repat h pamnad to, it. Dykws wal Rti dialida of IS, piolralwkl gamaiwal tapairaiaMs arch aAkh dd Apprdrer is andimed, 0, Nckhch A. 1ws any port of The waled of the mpam, a copy themd (imbding coo tonbas a 1n Use prprny volae. Or idawky of On Aipr.iwt, prdkttkslai Anlgmikws, rI* in w any pmdculow aM" wgarfrukmt. a also firm .kh .hich The Appsisrr It tlamwi d). sh.R be wed Aa any porrwtes by a"m but IM Owns gmctkd in Ue rap .. the timer if AMAW Rx lad fig oma. to rmngrgn to os uateoams wd ass11ms, monvile tasunn. a—ho w. pmkakwol apfaahal wprnaewws. tsar awe to k*mtry ippnaed fiownmt owlawkn. any depmmow, spray. or hrwramnwAoy d thin Vwmf Sawa or any Wal to the Oi.kY M CldulnMa, Whoin the pmaka, ofidea tWusrg d Tk Anativet: Ion Juts it be "twist toy a"= . Ow F Niv thnnO Sfwdhkg, pads: mlwkw, arse, wain, ar otlar mNha. akbaw An atlon+ cm+Ew *all aNaaral d Ilia Appsiwr, 9 Qin all oppalsais, cutynt ..wi.Aasmy asnpkfkw. mpaks, as thendons. de afts" trpsn wo; .wke eottiaakor.m raolrigrw W.w onyMsaM d th. impmmaeW. M • somkowMrlo mater, Ink JJNV '7.4a ('114► Amoamnd "�•" V • `p%,�.�,J ..�.�, ,j L'"PA ---V Isons-so's oerlavo r..,'r'ias"w sisal '� Council Agenda - 8/13/90 15. Consideration of rentinq out a portion of the old fire hall building. (R.W.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City staff was recently approached by an individual, Richard M. Knutson, who lives in Kjellberg's Trailer Park, who is interested in establishing a new business which would primarily assemble packages and distribute a new type of cable connector for use with wire rope and wire rope products. Mr. Knutson expressed interest in renting only a small portion of our old fire hall, as he felt the location and the building setup would be perfect for his needs. Mr. Knutson had met with 011ie on what types of assistance may be available through the City and inquired as to the availability of renting the old fire hall. I informed Mr. Knutson that it was not the City's intent to rent out the building but rather to sell it; and I indicated that the Council had previously indicated an unwillingness to get into the rental business. At this point, it does not appear that Mr. Knutson Is interested in the entire building but would only need approximately 1,200 sq ft, or less than half of the garage portion of the fire hall. Although I informed Mr. Knutson that the City would rather sell the building, he requested that I again ask the Council if they would consider a leasing arrangement. Rather than conLinually bringing this item up on the agenda, if the Council is not Interested in renting, I will certainly tell future individuals of our intent. While it appears that Mr. Knutson's needs may suit this building in that he does not intend to do any manufacturing at this time, only assembling of this connector through the use of possibly handicapped individuals, the City or the renter would have to install a partition in the building if we only rented a portion of it. While the City does have the building for sale, we are currently using the building for our own storage noods, including various water department supplies, occasional truck storage, and storage of our recycling containers. It appears that we may have difficulty in finding a place to storo all those items if we did rent the facility; and, therefore, it doesn't appear economical for us to consider renting it out at this time. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Council could authorize staff to determine square footage rental charge and advertise the property for rent in addition to having it for sale. 26 Council Agenda - 8/13/90 2. Direct the staff to consider only offers that include sale. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: While the request by Mr. Knutson is to only rent a small portion of the garage, it does appear that either the City or the renter would have to establish a partition wall to allow the balance of the fire hall to be used for other purposes if we are only going to rent half of the building. With a large portion of the building currently being used by various public works departments for storage, it may not be feasible for us to rent the building to a new company and then be looking for space ourselves to store items. I believe it was the intent of the Council to certainly consider selling the building if an adequate price could be obtained for it to get it back on the tax rolls; but it was my understanding that renting out the facility did not seem appropriate at this time. I, therefore, recommend we continue to offer the property for sale only. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None. 27 CITY OF MONTICELLO Month of IIIIY 19_10 1 1 PeAm ITS ACID USES L^et Thte Same Month Lest Year ThisYee[ PERMIT' ISSUED I Month JUNE Kn th JULY Leet Year To Date To Dat• RESIDENTIAL Numpar IB 10 9 69 75 Vet uetion 5438.900.00 5 521.900.00 $726,200.00 51,801,700.00 $1,501,500.00 lase 1,517.)7 4.ISP.15 4,670 ,49 le, cg7.46 11,29!.23 Surcharges 217.45 259.85 361.60 895.20 740.70 COMMERCIAL Number 6 3 3 13 16 Vet uetlon 115.700.00 81,800.00 43,000.00 719.000.00 2.642,500.00 Pave 1.406.52 679.10 443.00 5.197.44 14,931.81 Surcharges 57.60 40.90 21.50 359.50 1,320.50 INDUSTRIAL Num bar - l - - 4 Ve [uetlon 80.200.00 178.800.00 fees 908.00 1,999.47 Surcharges 40.10 89.40 PLUMB ING Number 9 6 1 22 26 Pee. 204.00 188.00 154,00 723.00 67).00 Surcharges 4.50 3.00 .50 11.00 13.00 OTHERS Number - - - 5 5 valuation .00 95,000.00 lase 50.00 11090.80 Surchergae 2.50 49.00 TOTAL 110. PERMITS 31 20 13 105 1I6 1 TOTAL VALUATION 554,600.00 683,900.00 769.200.00 2.525.300.00 4.417,800.00 TOTAL PEES 5.142.89 5.933.41 5.276.49 24,563.90 30.986.311 TOTAL BURCIIARGES 279.55 343.85 383.60 1.268.00 2.212.60 CUARCNT MONTH • FFE9 -Wombat to Date PERMIT NATURE Nuaher PERMIT BURCIIARGE yetuetlen This Year Leet year Dingle family 4 5 1.518.25 7 103.15 5 207,500.00 le 15 DUPle. 0 0 Multi-tamlly 1 1,162.01 124,05 269,300.00 1 i Co®•rclel 1 108.00 4.50 9,000.00 6 0 Ineuetrlel 1 550.40 40.10 80,200.00 2 0 R•e. G•rage• 1 25.00 1.75 2.500.00 3 ] Signs 1 O Public Ruitetnu• 0 0 ALTERATION M REPAIR Dvelung. 4 546.20 30.80 62,600.00 41 11 com•rc lel 2 571.10 )6.40 72.e.0.00 10 16 meunrl el 7 0 PLUMBING All Types 6 188.00 3.00 - 26 24 ACCESSORY BTAUCTLREB amleming Pools 0 0 - 1 0 Deck• 0 0 - 12 7 0 - 0 0 TEMPORARY PERMIT 0 0 7 5 DEMOLITION 0 TOTALS 20 4.669.00 343.85 683.900.00 126 105 A.. J 114DIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT Month of JULY , 19 -Lo - PERMIT NUMB EA DESCRIPTION TYPE NAME/LOCATION VALUATIOrI � PEES PERMIT SUR CNAP CE I PLUMB lNC SURCHARGE 90-1524 8 Unit Ape-.n[/Detached Garage MP Oa ryl Uelkes/739 Rlve rvlav Drlva 249,700.00 1162.05 124.05 - 78.00 .50 90-1525 Se.son Porch and Opan Porch AD Richard Quick/I1] Eaat 4th S[raet 7,000.00 90.00 7.50 90-1326 Detached Gere ge RC Daniel Yhaylen/61] S. Mnple Street 2,500.00 25.00 1.25 90-1527 Eat. rlor Remodeling AC Smith a Hayae/201 South Walnut 6.000.00 81.00 ].00 90-1520 House and Sc ra.eo Porch SF Jam.. Fuller/20] Els Street 38..00.00 408.69 29.40 24.00 .50 90-1529 Ilou se amd Ce roge Shingle Replacamm tAD� Cary Gaul[/101 Mlasfaef ppl Drlva 1.500.00 15.00 .50 90-15]0 House end Tuck Under Garage SP Value lua Plus Home./226 Crocus Lan. 31,100.00 377.50 25.55 24.00 .SO 90-15]1 Storage Carage C Montlullo Public School/705 County Rd PIIA 9.000.00 101.00 4.50 90-1572 House and C ro=. Shing la Bap lacoaat tAD Be rba r. Yager/1021 Yee[ Bt u.J�ay 1,500.00 IS. GO .50 90-1573 Hous. end Care" 9P Payne Build e m/2741 Maedw Lane 68.800.00 766.0] 24.40 2].00 .50 90-1574 Addition .Car age,Dack, int. Remodel AD Ruth Andersen/1119 Vast Riv ar Str.at 52.600.00 426.20 26.70 16.00 .50 90-LS35 Shingle Replocame nt AC Monticello Public School/702 Washington St. 66,800.00 490.10 3].40 90-13]6 Footing and Foundation 1 Wlllfam Tapper/112 Chelsea Hooa tlU,2U0.00 550.40 40.10 90-1571 House and Garage 8P Va lua Plua H.... 3 Crocus Lana 4d.n30.00' 766.03 24.40 23.00 ,SU PLAN RF.VI F.W TOTALS bB- 4,481.00 740.85 IHB.OS 1.6r 90.1324 . Unit Apartment/Detached Garage MP Daryl H. Ike*/159 Rfre rvfav Drlva 755.]] 90-132. House end Sc r..n Porch SP Jama. Pu ll. r/20] Els St rest 40.87 90-1570 House end Tuck Under Garage SF Valu. Plus Homaa/226 Crocus Lane 37.75 90-1537 Hous. and Garage SF Poy.. Builds,/2741 Haadou Lan, 3b.bO 90-1516 Footing and Foundation C Yllllam ToPp. r/112 Cha 1... Road ]57.76 90-1577 House and Carage Sr V.I.. Plus llomes/207 Crocus Lana 76.10 PIAN REVIEW TOTALS l7b4.41 REVENUE TOTALS 5.933.41