City Council Agenda Packet 09-24-1990i
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, Scptcmbcr 21, 1990 - 7:00 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Fran Fair, Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson,
Dan Blonigen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held September 10,
1990.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Consideration of a resolution pursuing acquisition of
Outlet A, Country Club Manor, in lieu of delinquent taxes and
assessments.
5. Consideration of adoption of resolution accepting petition for
annexation submitted by Joanne Halliger.
6. Consideration of resolution declaring coats to be assessed and
setting public hearing date on assessment roll --Meadows
Phase II, Project 90-03.
7. Consideration of extending moratorium on burning of certain
waste types by use of incinerators in the city of Monticello.
8. Consideration of street name change for Lauring Lane, 7th
Street, and/or Country Club Road.
9. Consideration of resolution adopting a records retention
schedule.
10. Consideration and review of the proposed 1991 budget of the
SWC4.
11. Consideration of proclaiming Wednesday, September 26, as
Toastmasters Day.
12. Consideration of final payment on Improvement No. 90SW-1,
concrete sidewalk and appurtenant work.
13. Consideration of City contribution to retailers' promotion for
banners.
14. Consideration of bills for the month of September.
15. Adjournment. r(
Ila. 11W1, J of 6Pfr147A) — f u4/17,4-tl /34i{ J„r uKc{ /0 71 P007 Q� a�
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, September 30, 1990 - 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Ken Maus, Fran Fair, Warren Smith, Shirley
Anderson, Dan Blonigen
Members Absent: None
2. Approval of minutes
Motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, and
carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting held August 27, 1990.
Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
Tom Moores of the Monticello Baseball Association noted that
the number of children participating in the program continues
to grow and finding enough baseball fields continues to be a
problem. He is concerned that some children may need to be
turned away from the program if fields are not developed.
Ken Maus noted that in recent months the school district
developed four baseball fields. The City elected not to
pursue development of baseball fields in addition to the
fields being developed by the school district. Moores
responded by saying that even four new fields is not going to
be enough. Mayor Maus suggested that the City take the
situation under advisement and requested that the Baseball
Association provide additional information regarding the
demand for baseball fields and concluded by saying that this
item should be brought up during 1991 budget preparation.
Consideration of a conditional use request to allow expansion
of an outdoor rental use in a B-3 (highway business) zone.
Applicant. General Rental.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the conditional use
request which would allow expansion of the existing General
Rental store site. The proposed expansion is an expansion of
land area only and calls for General Rental acquisition of a
strip of land 20 feet wide and 207 foot long running along the
northern perimeter of the property. O'Neill informed Council
that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
permit and went on to outline recommended conditions.
Pago 1
2
Council Minutes - 9/10/90
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Ai-,derson,
seconded by Dan Blonigen, to approve the conditional use
permit allowing expansion of an outdoor rental use in a B-3
(highway business) zone subject to the following conditions:
1. Outside services, sales, and equipment rental
connected with the principal uses is limited to
forty (40) percent of the gross floor area of the
principal use. This percentage may be increased as
a condition of the conditional use permit.
2. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from
view of neighboring residential uses or abutting
"R" District in compliance with Chapter 3,
Section 2 [G], of this ordinance.
3. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that
the light source shall not be visible from the
public right-of-way or from neighboring residences
and shall be in compliance with Chapter 3,
Section 2 (H], of this ordinance.
4. Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust.
5. The display or sales area shall not take up parking
spaces required for conformity to this ordinance.
6. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are
considered and satisfactorily met.
7. Rental items for display may not be placed in the
Highway 25 right-of-way or within 5 feet of the
Highway 25/property boundary line.
S. Bituminous surface and curb shall be installed
along the eastern boundary of the parking area up
to the 5 -foot setback line. All outside display of
goods shall be confined to bituminous surface
areas.
9. A minimum of five overstory trees shall be planted
along the northern perimeter of the property.
Motion carried unanimously.
Pago 2
G
Council Minutes - 9/10/90
5. Consideration of a simple subdivision request to subdivide an
existinq unplatted residential lot into two residential lots.
Applicant, Michael Robinson.
Gary Anderson, Zoning Administrator, informed Council that
Michael Robinson proposes to subdivide his existing
residential unplatted tract of land into two residential lots.
In this situation, the lot frontage available is not
sufficient to create two conforming lots. One of the lots
created will have a width that is 12 feet less than the
required 80 -foot width. Assistant Administrator O'Neill
pointed out that the Planning Commission recommended approval
of the subdivision as proposed based on the fact that the lot
created will have a total land area of 18,000 sq ft, which is
6,000 sq ft greater than the minimum. It was the finding of
the Planning Commission that the extra land area available
sufficiently offset the narrowness of the lot.
City Council reviewed a video of the site. Warren Smith noted
that this subdivision should not be approved based on the
rationale that lots in the old part of the city of Monticello
are 66 feet. He noted that the ordinance was created to allow
the City to move away from such narrow lots; however, he went
on to state that he could support the subdivision based on the
rationale that the total land area is 308 greater than the
minimum lot size. This particular aspect of the lot created
will serve to diminish the precedent set by allowing lots to
be platted with less than the required front footage.
After discussion, a motion was made by warren Smith, seconded
by Fran Fair, to approve the simple subdivision request to
subdivide an existing unplatted residential lot into two
residential lots with the following conditions:
a. Tho simple subdivision request must be recorded
within 30 days from September 10, 1990.
b. The drainage and utility easements must be recorded
within 30 days from September 10, 1990.
C. A document must be recorded indicating that
Parcel A is not served by city water and sewer
service, and the City is not responsible for
putting one in.
d. If a house is built on this lot, it will moot all
minimum setback requirements.
Pago 3
Council Minutes - 9/10/90
Within 30 days upon the sale, the existing shed
located on the lot will be removed.
Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of approvinq site plan callinq for establishment
of prairie qrass in lieu of sod at an industrial site.
Applicant, Tapper's. Inc.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Tapper's, Inc.,
proposes development of prairie grass in areas disturbed
during building construction. In addition, it is proposed
that undisturbed areas be maintained in their natural state.
The prairie grass will be planted and maintained for one year
by a company that specializes in establishment of prairie
grass. O'Neill went on to note that the City normally
requires that all grasses be cut to 6 inches within 100 feet
of an occupied structure. Approval of this site plan means
that the City will not require that Tapper's, Inc., cut their
grass within 100 feet of their property. O'Neill also
reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of
the site plan calling for establishment of prairie grass.
Kevin Norby, project architect, answered Council questions
regarding the overall landscaping plan. He noted the
environmental considerations supporting the concept of
establishing prairie grass. Prairie grass takes approximately
two to three years to establish and requires no pesticide or
fertilizer. In addition, the prairie grass provides a habitat
for wild life.
Fran Fair was concerned that approval of this plan might
encourage other property owners to let their existing grassy
areas grow wild. Assistant Administrator O'Neill noted that
natural vegetation and prairie grasses may be allowed to grow
in their natural state only upon prior approval by City
Council. All landscaping plans that include prairie grass
plantings must first be approved by City Council.
Dan Blonigen expressed support of establishing prairie grass
as proposed. He noted that a reduction in fertilizer and
pesticides needed to maintain prairie grass is good for the
environment. He also suggested that in caro of a dry summer,
it may be necessary to cut the prairie grass to oliminate the
potential of fire.
Pago 4
Council Minutes - 9/10/90
Warren Smith agreed with Councilmember Blonigen. He described
the proposal as arntcrcct'_ng _ ^eriment. He vent on to
state that there is no reason to destroy the wild life
habitat. We should, however, keep our eyes on it for three
years. This particular development of prairie grass plantings
will be a good test.
Fran Fair concurred that this appears to be an interesting
concept, but we should keep an eye on it, thereby assuring the
neighborhood that the plantings will help create a positive
image for the area.
Ken Maus noted that it is not inconceivable that the
establishment of the prairie grass so close to the perimeter
of the property in the front and on the sides may create a
problem with the neighbors. We should keep this in mind when
we review this site in the future.
After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by
Warren Smith, to approve the site plan proposing establishment
of prairie grass and maintenance of existing vegetation in
lieu of establishment of sod subject to the following
conditions:
1. The boulevard areas must be maintained in a manner
acceptable to City staff, which could require
mowing in the boulevard areasestablishment of
plants that grow no higher tha ?A'
15 inches.
iA,tp
2. Prior to any prairie grass burn, a burning permit
will be obtained by Tapper's, Inc.
3. The establishment of the prairie grass planting
will be executed by a professional firm capable of
successfully establishing prairie grass planting.
4. The site plan will be reviewed in three years or at
such time that building expansion occurs. In the
event the prairie grass planting becomes a
blighting influence on the neighborhood as
determined by Council, permission to allow grass to
grow over 6 inches high may be withdrawn.
5. Throughout the site, the plantings shall be
maintained free of noxious plant materials.
Motion carried unanimously.
Page 5
Council Minutes - 9/10/90
Consideration of award of bid for garbace/refuse pickup and
hauling ccr iccc.
John Simola, Public Works Director, outlined five options for
garbage/refuse pickup and hauling services. The first option
would be to continue with our existing contract with Corrow
Sanitation and twice -a -week pickup for all properties. The
second proposal would be to go with the low contractor bid for
automated pickup with single family through tri-plex being
picked up once a week and multiple units picked up twice a
week. Apartments need to be picked up twice a week because of
the storage limitations at the apartment sites. The third
option calls for awarding the bid to Vasko Sanitation for
once -a -week pickup using the existing container system. The
fourth option calls for the City performing automated pickup
once a week of the single family through tri-plex units. The
City would contract out twice -a -week pickup of the apartments
to a private hauler. The final option would be for the City
to perform automated pickup of all residential property and
City properties_ This option results in the lowest cost but
does not allow room for significant growth without the
possibility of some type of contracting at least on a limited
basis.
Ken Maus was concerned that the City would be getting too far
out front by providing the garbage pickup service. John
Simola noted that the Vasko Sanitation bid was far less than
the other bidders. He once was concerned that this low bid
might create a situation whereby Vasko would not be able to
execute the contract at the bid amount quoted. But now, after
reviewing the numbers with the Vasko people, he is confident
that Vasko will be able to economically serve Monticello at
the price quoted. Simola went on to note that all of the
references of Vasko check out well and that Vasko Is
successfully hauling garbage at Foley and Waite Park,
Minnesota. Simola stated that the City should consider
getting into purchasing the large 60 -gallon to 90 -gallon
containers; however, such purchases should be done based on
demand. it was his proposal that in the future residents be
allowed to rent 60 -gallon or 90 -gallon containers from the
City. This would allow the City to move into automated
garbage pickup on an incremental basis.
Fran Fair noted that there is no overriding reason to change
the current technique for picking up garbage; however, she did
note that it does make eonso to save money by eliminating one
garbage pickup per week.
Page 6
Council minutes - 9/10/90
Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to
switch to once-a-,.,:cck service using the existing container
system and award the bid to Vasko, Inc., at an annual cost of
$93,564. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen,
cancelling Corrow Sanitation's contract at the end of the
contract period. Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of final payment on Protect 90-03, the Meadows
Second Addition Phase Il.
John Simola reported that the Meadows Second Addition Phase 11
project is essentially complete and that Redstone Construction
has only a couple of small punch list items to complete.
Simola went on to report that the final payment to Redstone
Construction of Mora is in the amount of $4,209, and the total
cost of the project came in at $77,355, which is $3,000 under
budget.
Motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen,
to approve final payment to Redstone Construction of Mora in
the amount of $4,209 upon completion of the few remaining
punch list items. Motion carried unanimously.
Review of six-month liquor store financial revort.
Joe Hartman was present to review the six-month financial
report for the liquor store. Rick Wolfateller's report
indicated that the financial statement appears to indicate
that the liquor operation Is doing well. Sales for the first
six months are up 69 over last year, and the resulting gross
profit on the sales is up over 15%.
Warren Smith noted that the liquor store report is excellent
and commended Hartman for reducing administrative expenses
while increasing gross profits.
Ken Maus suggested that the City look at earmarking specific
uses of funds so voters can got a handle on what store revenue
does for the city.
10. Consideration of a resolution oursuinq acquisition of
Outlot A, Country Club Manor, in lieu of delinquent taxes and
assessments.
Ken Maus requested that TOM Hayes be present at the next
meeting to discuss this item.
Pago 7
Council Minutes - 9/10/90
There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Warren
Smith, seconded by Sh-Irloy Anderson., to teble this Matter.
Motion carried unanimously.
11. Consideration of replacing driveway culvert at 1505 West River
Street.
John Simola reported that the City recently received a letter
from Mr. Ron Nygaard regarding one of his neighbor's culverts
located five lots away. This particular culvert is a 15 -inch
culvert; but because of its grade and size at times freezes
solid over the winter and stops the flow of snow melt and
rainwater in the early spring. The driveway at 1505 is
significantly high so that the water cannot run over the
driveway without backing up into Nygaard's basement to a
walkout door. Simola noted that normally culvert maintenance
and replacement are the property owner's responsibility;
however, in this case, the City has already replaced one of
the culverts at no cost to the property owner and has
essentially set a precedent at least in this area to replace
culverts at no cost to the property owner. By replacing the
culvert at Lor. 5 with a larger culvert set at a different
grade, we could expect to eliminate the freezing problems at
least at this location. By having City crews replace the
G culvert, we should be able to keep the City's out-of-pocket
expense to around $500 excluding labor.
Mr. Gronau, the resident at 1505 West River Street had no
problem with the City replacing the culvert and patching the
driveway at no cost to him.
Fran Fair concurred that the $500 is money well spent, as it
could cost significantly more to the City if the frozen
culvert causes a basement to be flooded.
Simola also noted that the City needs to update its ordinance
by increasing the minimum culvert size from 12 inches to
15 inches or larger as prescribed by the City Engineer. Ken
Maus suggested that we bring the culvert design standards
ordinance amendment back to the City Council at a future
meeting.
There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Fran
Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, to approve replacement of the
culvert as necessary at 1505 West River Street at an estimated
out-of-pocket expense of $500. Motion carried unanimously.
Pago 8
9
Council Minutes - 9/10/90
L' 12. Consideration of ordinance amendment adiustino Mayor and
Council r_omoensation.
City Council reviewed the existing salary levels and reviewed
the salaries provided by other communities to council members
and mayors. Dan Blonigen noted that he prefers a flat monthly
rate payment and that he prefers not to be paid by the
meeting. Fran Fair stated that an adjustment to the salaries
Is not needed. She proposed that the City spend more money on
Council training and City organization team building. She
went on to suggest that given the Council turnover in 1991, it
might be wise to spend additional time and energy educating
the new Council members via Council workshops and joint
meetings with the Planning Commission. Dan Blonigen noted
that all other City employees get a raise and that it is not
unreasonable for the Council to consider a raise as well.
Fran Fair stated that serving on the City Council is a civic
duty and minimal pay is acceptable. Dan Blonigen noted that
Council members earn every bit of the pay they receive.
Ken Maus stated that he supports the concept of establishing
an in-house workshop with the new Council members at which
time the remaining Council members and staff can spend at
least a whole day explaining City operations and reviewing
current plans and plans for the future. Maus also noted that
he is not against an increase; however, he would not favor the
increase unless the Council is in full support of such an
increase.
Warren Smith noted that he does not have a strong opinion
regarding any proposed increase in Council salaries. He did
note that if a motion was made, he would support the increase.
He also went on to state that serving on the Council requires
considerable investment of time and energy. The salary is a
nice way of compensating the Council members for hours
studying the issues and attending meetings.
Motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to
increase the salary of the Mayor approximately 5% annually
from the previous increase, which results in a salary for the
Mayor of $250 per month and results in a salary for the
Council members of $195 per month. Motion carried
unanimously. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT N0. 196.
Pago 9
9
Council Minutes - 9/10/90
13. Consideration of Qamblinq license aDDlication--Jovner Lanes.
Administrator wolfsteller reported that the Monticello Jaycees
currently operate pull -tab gambling at both the Silver Fox and
the Comfort Inn motels; and if Council does not oppose an
additional license for Joyner Lanes, the Jaycees have
requested staff write a letter to the Gambling Control
Division waiving our 60 -day notice requirement allowing them
to issue the license as soon as possible.
No action was taken by Council; therefore, the gambling
license is approved.
14. Other matters.
John Simola reported on the 7th Street project noting that it
is near completion. He also noted that the City is going to
investigate installation of a 5 -foot fence along the parking
lot on the south side of 7th Street. In addition, Slmola
brought up the concept of planting boulevard trees on the new
portion of the 7th Street right-of-way.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to pursue
obtaining cost estimates for fence and the tree plantings
every 50 feet along the 7th Street right-of-way.
Mayor Maus presented a petition from people complaining about
the speed and number of trucks using Broadway to get from
Highway 25 to the freeway. Staff noted that the City Attorney
would be contacted to determino if there is any way the number
of trucks on this stretch of roadway can be reduced. In
addition, staff will contact the sheriff's department to
reiterate the need to enforce the speed limit in the affected
area.
Ken Maus suggested that next year the City consider
establishing a police commission to address items such as the
one noted above. The police commission could also provide a
valuable service by reviewing all now contracts with the
Wright County Sheriff's Department. Finally, he requested
that the City meet with the Wright County Sheriff's Department
regarding the now contract prior r-osubmittalof the contract
to the City.
Dan Blonigon asked for a status report on the final completion
of the picnic shelter at Ellison Park. Roger Mack noted that
the now plates are on and that final staining is now underway.
The now plates will be boltod down shortly.
Pago 10
Council Minutes - 9/10/90
l- John Simola updated the status of the water tower and noted
that the tower had to be taken off line with the water drained
out so as to allow inspection. Ken Maus reported problems
created by the sudden loss of water pressure when the tower
was taken off line. Maus directed staff to provide public
notice prior to taking the main water tower off line.
There being no further discussion, the meeting adjourned.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
Page 11
(D
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
4. Consideration of a resolution pursuinq acquisition of
Outlot A. Country Club Manor, in lieu of delinquent taxes and
assessments. (R -W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
This item was discussed by the Council at the September 10
Council meeting and tabled to allow myself and the City
Attorney to be present to answer questions regarding this
process.
Enclosed is a copy of the agenda supplement from the
September 10 meeting outlining the background on this topic.
The process being proposed tonight has been done by some
communities on a limited basis and is not used very often in
acquiring title to property. I inquired of the county
auditor's office as to the status of their tax forfeiture
procedures and was informed that the auditor's staff is
currently working on conducting a possible tax forfeiture sale
of all delinquent properties during the spring of 1991. If
this Outlot A of Country Club Manor was a part of the tax
forfeiture sale in the spring, there may not be a need for the
City to pursue this other avenue to acquire title to the
property; but at this point, the county auditor's office will
not give me any guarantees that they will be able to complete
all their paperwork for all the delinquent parcels in the
county to hold a sale by March of 1991. In other words, it is
their intention to hold a sale, finally; but in all
likelihood, I Coal the City will still be waiting for the
county to do their process for possibly anothor year or two.
City Attorney, Tom Hayes, will be present to outline the
advantages and disadvantages of pursuing acqulaltion of this
property through the Chapter 262 process. Whilo it appears
that one of the disadvantages of acquiring the land this way
is that we will have to pay the delinquent real estate taxes
to the other taxing jurisdictions in the amount of
approximately $4,500, it does assure us that we would obtain
title earlier than by waiting for the county to proceed with
their tax forfeiture regulations. For the past number of
years, I have bean contacting the auditor's off 1co to inquire
about the process of tax forfeiture sales, and we have
continually been informed that it was coming In the near
future. Whilo it may be the intention of the auditor's office
to actually have a sale next March, I boliove the City should
proceed with this alternative in an attempt to acquire title
as early as possible. I have been contacted by a developer
who has exprossed interest in this property if the City had
title to it, and the sooner we can got the property on the tax
rolls, tho bottor off we will be. As a result, I recommend
that the rosolution be adoptod as indicated in alternative I1
of the Septombo r 10 Council agenda summary.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of rosolut ion; Copy of agenda package fron Soptembor 10.
RESOLUTION 90 -
WHEREAS, there are accrued and unpaid taxes and special assessments
levied against Outlot A, Country Club Manor, city of Monticello, in
the following amounts:
1980 - $65,118.74
1981 - 58,424.52
1982 - 55,429.84
1983 - 52,403.78
1984 - 49,393.58
1985 - 390.26
1986 - 380.08
1987 - 430.24
1988 - 469.80
1989 - 517.18
together with penalties and Interest; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello wishes to acquire said real estate
under Minnesota Statute 282.01 for public purposes to wit:
development of residential housing or such other public purpose for
which the City Council of the City of Monticello by resolution
subsequently determines;
NOW, THEREFORE, be It resolved that the City Administrator for the
City of Monticello shall petition the Wright County Board of
Commissionerfor sale to the City of Monticello of the above
described real estate for a price equal to the unpaid taxes and
assessments levied against said real estate.
Adopted this 24th day of September, 1990.
City Administrator
Mayor
0
Council Agenda - 9/10/90
10. Consideration of a resolution pursuinq acquisition of
Outlet A, Country Club Manor, in lieu of delinquent taxes and
assessments. ;R.W.1,
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As part of the 1978-1 improvement project, Outlot A of Country
Club Manor received an assessment for street improvements
along with sewer and water extensions in the original amount
of $280,228.28. The outlet is part of the Country Club Manor
residential development fronting on Country Club Road adjacent
to I-94 between the golf course and Elm Street.
The parcel currently owned by Marvin George of Princeton,
Minnesota, has not had any taxes or special assessments paid
in the last ten years; and with penalties and interest
accumulating, the balance owing is approximately $515,000 at
this point. Since the property is delinquent in its taxes, I
do believe the County will be including this parcel under its
tax forfeiture procedures next year. It would appear that if
the City is willing to wait long enough, we should be able to
obtain title to the property through the tax forfeiture
procedures in another year or so.
In discussing this property with our City Attorney, Tom Hayes,
it came to my attention that other communities have been
successful in acquiring title to the property in lieu of
delinquent taxes and assessments through another means rather
than waiting for the County to go through its process under
the tax forfeiture regulations. Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 282, in regard to tax forfeited land sales allows the
City to petition to the County Board of Commissioners
requesting that the property be turned over to the City as
long as the City is willing to use the property for a public
purpose. This public purpose can be established by the
Council to mean development of residential housing or any
other public purpose which the City Council determines. The
only drawback to this procedure is that if the City obtained
title to the property, it would be our responsibility to pay
the real estate taxes owing to the other taxing jurisdictions
such as the school and the county. Approximately $4,500 of
the $515,000 is actual real estate taxes; and unless the
school and/or the county agree to abate their portion of the
taxes, the City would have to pay this amount to obtain title.
I have had a number of conversations with Marvin George on hie
intentions for this property and asked him whether he would be
willing to just quit claim dead the property to the City, as
it certainly appeared he would be losing the property through
tax forfeiture eventually. Initially, Mr. George indicated a
willingness to do this but then changed hie mind and asked for
17 V
Council Agenda - 9/10/90
a few concessions from the City, including the ability to
receive the sion rental income he has been gatti,iy for the
next five years. Currently, approximately $7,000 per year
income is received by Mr. George off of this property for the
freeway billboards; and it appeared that this is an
unreasonable request considering he has not paid any taxes in
the last ten years. As a result, I requested that our City
Attorney pursue whatever avenue was available for the City to
obtain title to this property so that we can market the
property to other interested developers. In all likelihood,
even if we do obtain title to the property, it does not appear
that we will ever get our original investment back, as I do
not believe the property will be worth the $515,000. But it
does seem like ten years is long enough to wait; and if the
City had title to the property, we should be able to find a
developer even if we had to reduce the price of the land below
the $500,000 price. our original assessment was $280,000 with
the balance being penalties and interest that have accumulated
over the last ten years.
In order to proceed with this process under Chapter 282, the
Council would have to adopt a resolution indicating a desire
to obtain title to this property and to petition the Wright
County Board of Commissioners to turn over the property to the
City in lieu of the unpaid taxes and assessments.
As I indicated, approximately $4,500 of the $515,000 is actual
real estate taxes, which the City would have to pay to acquire
title without getting the taxes abated by each jurisdiction.
The City Council could request each taxing jurisdiction abate
their share of the taxes based on the assumption that the City
is trying to acquire this land for a public purpose and
promote faster development of the property than what would
occur under the present situation. Mainly, the school
district and the county would have to agree to forego their
share of the taxes, and there is no guarantee that they would
be willing to do so. The argument could be made that by the
City taking this action to acquire the property, we will be
Increasing the tax base sooner than what would happen with the
property remaining in Marvin George's hands.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Adopt a resolution petitioning the County Board to sell
the property to the City for the unpaid taxes and
assessments. Council could also direct staff to request
the school district and the county governments to abate
their portion of the taxes in the public interest of
future development.
,s O
Council Agenda - 9/10/90
Do aoL puLiLivu the County at this point and wait for the
tax forfeiture procedures to take place scheduled for
1991 or later.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It has become apparent to the City that Mr. George does not
have any intention of paying the back taxes or special
assessments on this property. The City will be able to obtain
title to the property some day because of the back taxes, but
this could take another year or two. In the meantime,
Mr. George is continuing to collect the sign rental income of
approximately $7,000 per year; and it would appear that it
would be in our best interest to own the property and seek out
other developers who might be interested in developing the
property as soon as possible. It appears unlikely that the
City will ever recapture its entire cost, including interest
and penalties, in this property; but the sooner we're able to
market the property, the more we will be able to realize,
including increased property valuations, when developed. As
a result, I recommend the Council adopt a resolution and
authorize the City Attorney to proceed with the action to
obtain title to this property.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution; Copy of concessions requested by Marvin
George; Copy of map of Outlot A.
19 0
Phones
Princeton
Ott':
RO. BOX 426
t Mile
(C
'1
Minneapolis
ii
sNY��
�^K+`
il1J
South Ot
(612)332.3034
'
�O se
„1�
Princeton
MN 55371
1��f
on Hwy, 169
&ACEW- '
"EAST CENTRAL MINNESOTA'S LARGEST BUILDER"
July 27, 1990
City of Monticello
Administration Office
250 E. Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Dear Rick:
Per our phone conversations pertaining to Country Club Manor
2nd Addition, Monticello, MN. I would be interested in selling
this property to the City of Monticello for $25,000 cash, or
I would Quick Claim Deed over the property to the city for the
rights to collect the lease rental on the four highway signs,
that are on the property for a period of five years.
Enclosed please find a statement from the Sign Company stating
the amount of money I received in 1990. This is a total of
$7,062.79. This increases by 52 each year. If the city was
to collect their rent for a five year period they would have over
$40,000.
I feel that I'm entitled to get my initial investment back, which
was $25,000. Plus the sign rental that is due in the fall of 1990.
I want to keep those monies in addition to the $25,000. If the city•
chooses to go with the Quick Claim Deed and allow me to collect
for the next five years on the sign rental. The years I would
collect would be 1992, 1993, 1996, 1995, and 1996. I feel that
if the county and the city go through a foreclosure, as by law,
this is going to take approximately two years. Plus an additional
cost by all parties. I think the settlement I am presenting
is a fair one for both parties. Please review this and contact
me as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
�Marvin Ce6rge, President
Marvin George Builders, Inc.
MG:mk
Eel
' • Ufa ,•, �:'s •n.a ra ,re •. a,•it�'q� c � � ,it+i
(N2•4
5 26
N2`a3
aE�,ti#...•.r ---,^=566•S9'21'ES7L{7a�- -`---- --__4»��R.1 -'SB6•S9'2ilE•A38•d'b"=i
i = rS r{;. '__ ,� Fit, •a r'.. -_._- �_ aar /Ni6ysi.r • ,w• ... .. A'�"_"-r �¢
IS8T�? `S871a$a'E 40rS0t�• _ .. �4.+ _ „(• .q r' -.� 1-'>
t-r99.1a• ` i}'t
35
,' ` �'� a �L_._`—...moi.=.—' ` ..np��i w t ,,,n •ori r'n+••a',., .;.'-',t'•^.i ,�^'-,.'.:
54
+. •'•'_°' .i* 3`a'J„'. 4 iS66•SS'21•E t a t_ •�M��I .--.wn�. Cf = .u„
• � �! atg X45. !! 4'G �!!� ! • �t°.tr-. i t n. 'r. .• �iii,� �•«,�i't ! � R1 D
ls" ��f s. si '� 4 �� �•• �i E{ qn 1 .`n--'�•-•S.w-•� It f_,'.�w:
F y '•i t.
413 st .�1. ` •�^'k +._�`t� j. .�\``yr'!S' R +;"���•.�,<, �".
11": - •.•••. K-�t• wpn
10
V
t
!�
jF
r
r•
\u�„• ��i viii
1•M„t Mtr
4
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
5. Consideration of adoption of resolution accepting petition for
annexation submitted by Joanne Halliqer. (J.0.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you may recall, early this summer Joanne Halliqer expressed
interest in development of her property when she submitted a
request for a conditional use permit to the OAA. This
conditional use permit would have allowed her to develop four
one -acre lots on her property at the corner of Gillard and
County Road 39. Now that it has been determined that
utilities will be extended in front of her property,
Mrs. Halliger has elected to request annexation to the city of
Monticello. It is my understanding that she intends on
selling her property, which increases in value once it is in
the city limits.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to adopt the resolution accepting Mrs. Halliger's
petition fur annexation.
This request is consistent with the unsigned joint
resolution between the Town of Monticello and the City of
Monticello concerning the Orderly Annexation Area. This
item has been discussed at the OAA meetings and has been
a topic of discussion at Township Board meetings. It is
my understanding that the Township supports the petition
for annexation.
As an additional note, the City of Monticello has adopted
the joint resolution; however, the Township has not as
yet signed the document. It is my understanding,
however, that the Township does agree with major portions
of the document and that this joint agreement can be used
as a guide for the time being even though It remains
unofficial. I will be mooting with the Township Board on
October 1, 1990, for the purpose of determining what
adjustments need to be made, if any, to the joint
resolution prior to Township adoption.
Annexation should also be supported based on the fact
that the Halligor property is subject to a potential
assessment of $55,770. The City will be unable to
recover this assessment until such time that the property
is annexed to the city. Even with annexation, Halligor
will receive a three-year abatement of interest, which is
consistent with previous Council action regarding
treatment of the Krautbauer and Norell properties. As
you recall, in adopting an earlier finance plan, Council
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
established a policy for assessing properties that were
crossed by a utility line when said line was not
requested by the property owner. The policy established
calls for abatement of interest expense for a period of
three years or until such time that the property is
platted. It is staff's understanding that the three-year
interest abatement period for assessments begins at such
time that the assessment roll is adopted. Properties
benefiting by the improvement but not part of the
assessment roll because they are in the township would
receive the interest abatement beginning at the date the
assessment roll is adopted and not on the date the
property is annexed to the city.
2. Motion to deny adoption of the resolution accepting
Mrs. Halliger's petition for annexation.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council select alternative 41 for
reasons outlined above. This Item has been discussed at the
OAA meetings and has been a topic of discussion at Township
Board meetings. It is my understanding that the Township
supporta the petition for annexation.
If Council adopts the attached resolution, then staff will
submit it to the Township Board along with a request that the
Township formally approve the annexation. City staff will
work with Joanne Halllger to complete the details associated
with the annexation. If the Township Board does not stand in
the way of the annexation, then the annexation process is very
simple and straight forward; therefore, staff feels
comfortable In expediting the annexation process.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of joint resolution between Town of Monticello and the
City of Monticello concerning the Orderly Annexation Area;
Resolution accepting petition for annexation; Copy of the
petition for annexation.
URBANIZATION PLAN
JOINT RESOLUTION BETWEEN
THE TOWN OF MONTICELLO AND THE CITY OF MONTICELLO
CONCERNING THE ORDERLY ANNEXATION AREA
WHEREAS; reoccurring boundary adjustments have occurred between the
City of Monticello and the Town of Monticello for the last twenty
years and uncertainty as to future adjustments has resulted; and
WHEREAS; responding to requests for boundary adjustments on a case
by case basis, apart from an overall plan for urbanization, is
expensive, time consuming, and counterproductive; and
WHEREAS; it has been difficult for the Town of Monticello and the
City of Monticello and property owners within the Orderly
Annexation Area to plan separately for development and growth; and
WHEREAS; the Minnesota Municipal Board has requested that the
Monticello Orderly Annexation Board, the City, and the Town work
cooperatively in re-examining the future of the Orderly Annexation
Area to determine if development is being properly focused; and
WHEREAS; the Minnesota Municipal Board has urged the City and Town
to approach the orderly annexation issue with a spirit of
cooperation; and
WHEREAS; it appears to be In the best interest of both parties that
® joint cooperation and planning between the parties be conducted;
and
WHEREAS; the parties want to stabilize and enhance the
predictability of boundary adjustments; and
WHEREAS; there is a basis for agreement between the parties for
accomplishing these goals, and the parties hereto do set forth the
terms of this agreement by they following:
The Town of Monticello and the City of Monticello hereby jointly
agree to the following:
CONTINUING THE MONTICELLO ORDERLY ANNEXATION AREA
That the following Orderly Annexation Area in the Town of
Monticello was established by a Minnesota Municipal Board Order on
December B, 1972, as in need of orderly annexation pursuant to
Minnesota Statute Chapter 414, et al.
URBANPLN.RES: 9/17/90 Page 1
0
LAND USE GUIDE PLAN
The Town of Monticello and the City of Monticello, upon their
adoption of this policy, approve the Monticello Orderly Annexation
Area Plan which is attached as Exhibit "B" (hereinafter referred to
as the Guide Plan).
3. URBAN SERVICE AREA
The area identified within the Guide Plan as the "Urban Service
Area" is an area that abuts the City of Monticello and is presently
urban or suburban in nature or is about to become urban or
suburban. Further, the City of Monticello is now capable of
providing municipal water and sanitary sewer to this area.
4. ANNEXATION PROCESS
Annexation should be allowed to occur upon the following terms and
conditions:
A. The property must be located within the above described
"Urban Service Area";
B. The property owner must petition both the City of
Monticello and the Town of Monticello for annexation;
C. The property owner shall submit a development plan to the
City of Monticello and the Town of Monticello showing the
need for municipal water and sanitary sewer for at least
808 of the property petitioned for annexation;
D. The development plan must be of sufficient detail to show
it will meet the standards and requirements of the City
of Monticello's zoning and planning ordinance, land use
plan, comprehensive plan, utilities plan, assessment
procedures, and financing plan;
E. Municipal water and sanitary sewer shall be installed and
ready for use within two (2) years from the date of
annexation; and
F. There shall be no future petitions for annexation until
all previous conditions in the development plan have boon
complied with.
Prior to final City approval of the development plan, said plan
shall be submitted to the Town of Monticello for review. Concerns
expressed by the Town of Monticello shall be addressed prior to
formal approval of the development plan by the City of Monticello.
URBANPLN.RES; 9/13/90
Page 2
All efforts will be made to establish development plans that
incorporate the land use planning efforts of both the City of
Monticello and the Town of Monticello. No development plan shall
be approved by the City unser tnis agreement without written
support submitted by the Town of Monticello. If the City receives
written approval of the development plan from the Town, a joint
petition for annexation shall be submitted to the Minnesota
Municipal Board.
If the Town of Monticello does not approve the development plan, it
shall submit its reasons in writing to the City of Monticello. The
City shall then either reject the development plan, or the issue
may be submitted to the Minnesota Municipal Board pursuant to
Minnesota Statute Chapter 414.
-�02WKR
The term of this agreement shall be ten (10) years from the
effective date of this agreement. Both parties reserve the right
to terminate this agreement upon sixty (60) days' written notice.
The effective date shall be upon the approval of the City Council
of the City of Monticello and the Town Board of the Town of
Monticello and acceptance by the Minnesota Municipal Board and said
subsequent order approving this agreement.
6. LAND USE/ZONING AND PLANNING
C The zoning and planning throughout the Orderly Annexation Area as
described above shall be under the control of the Monticello
Orderly Annexation Board until annexed to the City of Monticello.
If the property is annexed to the City of Monticello, the property
shall be designated as agricultural according to the City of
Monticello Zoning and Planning Ordinances. Any alteration or
change to the zoning classification shall be subject to a public
hearing to be hold by the City of Monticello Planning Commission.
The City of Monticello shall notify the Town of Monticello of said
land use classification hearing.
7. TAXES
Any and all of the property taxes collected in the Orderly
Annexation Area shall remain the property of the Town of
Monticello. Any and all property taxes collected from annexed
properties shall be the property of the City of Monticello after
such time that said property actually receives City sewer and water
service or after expiration of a period of three (3) years,
whichever occurs sooner.
URBANPLN.RES: 9/13/90 Page 3
B. ISOLATED TOWN PROPERTY
Any property within the "Urban Service Area" that becomes or is
about tc beccwe isclated as a result of anuexaLion proposed under
Section 4 shall be submitted for consideration to the Minnesota
Municipal Board along with the proposed annexation for
consideration by the Minnesota Municipal Board. In general, the
creation of such isolated parcels should be avoided.
9. DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE AREA IDENTIFIED ON THE ANNEXATION PLAN
AS THE AGRICULTURAL AREA.
No development should occur within the orderly annexation area
which is outside the "Urban Service Area" as described in the MOAA
Annexation Plan unless said development meets the standards of the
zoning and subdivision requirements of the Monticello Orderly
Annexation Board, the City of Monticello, and the Town of
Monticello. Said development can only occur if all local
government standards are complied with or are capable of being
complied with in the future. The intent of this paragraph is to
strongly discourage development outside the "Urban Service Area" as
identified in the Orderly Annexation Plan.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Passed and adopted by the City
Council of the City of
Monticello this day of
19_
By
Its Mayor
ATTEST:
City Administrator
URBANPLN.RES: 9/13/90
TOWN OF MONTICELLO
Passed and adopted by the Town
Board of the Town of
Monticello this day of
19_
By
Its Chairman
ATTEST:
Town Board Clerk
Page 4
0
RESOLUTION 90 -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, Joanne Halliger, owner of territory described below,
requests that the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, annex this
territory to the city and to extend the city boundaries to include
the same; and
WHEREAS, the territory to be annexed consists of 7.7 acres, all of
this land entirely within the county of Wright, Minnesota, and the
description of such land is as follows:
That part of Government Lot 2 and the southwest 1/4 of the
northeast 1/4 of Section 18, Township 121, Range 24, Wright
County, Minnesota, which lies northerly of the south
1,622.88 feet thereof, except therefrom the east 24 rods
(396 feet) thereof, subject to public road easements and
easements of record containing 7.7 acres more or less; and
WHEREAS, the territory described above abuts directly upon the city
limits at the northeast boundary thereof, and none of it is
presently included within the corporate limits of any incorporated
city; and
WHEREAS, annexation of this parcel is consistent with the land use
guide plan adopted by the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area; and
WHEREAS, the parcel Is located In the urban service area which
identities land that Is presently urban or suburban in nature or
about to become urban or suburban; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is now capable of providing
municipal water and sanitary sewer to this area; and
WHEREAS, a development plan is In place showing the need for
municipal water and sanitary sewer for at least 809 of the property
petitioned for annexation; and
WHEREAS, the development plan meets standards and requirements of
the City of Monticello's zoning and planning ordinance, land use
plan, comprehensive plan, utilities plan, assessment procedures,
and financing plan; and
WHEREAS, municipal water and sanitary sewer shall be installed and
ready for use within two years from the date of annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, DE ST RESOLVED THAT the City of Monticello accepts
said petition for annexation.
Adopted this 24th day of September, 1990.
Mayor
City Administrator Lp i�ld
J' 1 �J 4
C
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
To the Council of the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota:
i, the undersigned, the owner of the territory described below,
hereby request the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, to annex
this territory to the city and to extend the city boundaries to
include the same, and for that purpose respectfully state:
1. The territory to be annexed consists of 7.7 acres. All
of this land lies entirely within the county of Wright,
Minnesota, and the description of such land' is as follows:
That part of Govt. Lot 2 and the S/W I of the N/E i of Section 18, Township
121, Range 24 Wright County, Minnesota, which lies northerly of the south
1,622.88 feet thereof except therefrom the east 24 rods (396') thereof.
Subject to public road easements and easements of record. Containing 7.7
acres more or less.
2. The territory described above abuts upon the city limits at
the narrheask boundary thereof, and none of It is
presently Included within the corporate limits of any
incorporated city.
3. Allof this territory is or Is about to become urban or
suburban In character.
MINEX.PET: 8/23/90
Signature(s)
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
L 6. Consideration of resolution declaring costs to be assessed and
setting public hearinq Jere on AC9P9Cmert. roll--MPAd0wR
Phase II, Project 90-03. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Final payment to Redstone Construction on the Meadows 2nd
Addition Phase II improvement project was recently approved by
the Council, and the staff has been putting together the
entire cost of the project for developing an assessment roll.
The total construction cost was $77,355.41, and all other
indirect costs such as design, survey, city inspection, along
with legal and administrative fees totaled an additional
$21,227.99 for a total assessable amount of $98,583.40.
Matt and Steve Holker, along with Tom Holthaus, are the owners
of the property involved and originally petitioned for the
improvements and also entered into a developer's agreement
with the City for this project. The developer's agreement
calls for the assessments to be spread to the project as a
whole for 14 lots and requires that each occupancy permit pay
off two assessments. As a result, the City should receive its
assessments in full when half of the project is developed.
The original estimate for this project was approximately
$101,000, and the $98,583.40 figure is slightly below our
original estimate.
while our developer's agreement indicates that the developers
cannot object to the amount of the assessments, a public
hearing should be established on adoption of the assessment
roll to meet Chapter 429 requirements since a bond was sold to
finance this improvement.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Adopt a resolution declaring the cost to be assessed and
set the public hearing for October 9, 1990.
2. Do not set the public hearing.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Since the project has boon finalod out and all of the costs
aro known, staff recommends that the public hearing on
adoption of the assessment roll be scheduled for October 9 in
order to certify the assessments with the county auditor yet
this year.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
t
Copy of resolution; Summary of project cost.
`N5
RESOLUTION 90 -
RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED,
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT,
AND SEINING A HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, a contract has been let and the costs determined for the
Improvement of Crocus Lane and Crocus Circle within the Meadows 2nd
Addition with sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, bituminous
streets, curb and gutter, and appurtenant work, and the contract
price for such improvements is $77,355.41, and the expenses
Incurred or to be incurred in the making of such Improvements
amount to $21,227.99, so that the total cost of the Improvement
will be $98,583.40.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the
City is hereby estimated to be $0.00, and the portion of the
cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is
estimated to be $98,583.40.
2. The City Administrator shall forthwith calculate the proper
amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against
every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land within the
district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as
provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed
assessment in his office for public inspection.
3. A hearing shall be held on the 9th day of October, 1990, In
the City Iiall at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed
assessment, and at such time and place all persons owning
property affected by such Improvement will be given an
opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
4. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of
the hcariny on the proposed assessment to be published once In
the official itewspapor at least two weeks prior to the
hearing, and he shall state in the no tice the total cost of
the improvement. fie shall blso cause malled assessment roll
not less than two weeks prior to the hearings.
AdopLod by the Council this 24th day of September, 1990.
Mayor
City Administrator
Ci
N
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project 90-03
Meadows 2nd Addition Phase II
Construction Costs - Redstone
$77,355.41
Engineer - Design 11% - OSM
9,008.95
- Survey, Staking - OSM
2,479.25
- Testing - Braun Eng.
1,192.40
City Inspection - 84 hrs @ $35
2,940.00
P.W. & Admin. Charge (2B of construction)
1,547.11
Legal 6 Bond Issue•
Springsted $10,547.42
Moody's 2,263.60
Holmes b Graven 2,015.00
$14,826.02 X 15.078
2,234.28
Publishing - Monticello Times
15.00
Interest Cost During Construction
Until Assessment Hearing 10/9/90
1,811.00
TOTAL
$98,583.40
•Bond issue was $730,000 of which $620,000 was for "refunding"
Issue; therefore, Meadows share is 15.07% for the $110,000 bond.
3
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
Consideration of extendinq moratorium on burning of certain
wAste t,ynpc by trap of inclnPTAtorR in the city of Monticello.
(J.O.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
In October of 1989, the City Council established a one-year
moratorium on infectious and hazardous waste incinerators.
The purpose of the moratorium was to provide the City time
necessary to develop land use regulations that would properly
control this type of planned use. Almost one year later,
staff has prepared the necessary regulations. City staff has
delayed study of this issue pending adoption of infectious
waste management rules by the State of Minnesota. It seemed
to make more sense to wait to develop City regulations after
the State had completed its study and outlined rules governing
waste incineration.
On September 14, 1990, the City was notified that infectious
waste management rules have now been adopted. City staff will
now be able to develop local regulations that are consistent
and complement the regulations that have been prepared by the
State of Minnesota. Since the State rules were not completed
until September 14, 1990, staff is not able to meet the
deadline of preparing land use regulations for Council
adoption by October 1990; therefore, staff requests that
Council consider adopting an interim ordinance placing a
moratorium on burning of certain waste types by use of
incinerators In the city of Monticello. It is requested that
this moratorium be established for a period of 18 months.
This Interim ordinance is intended to allow the City time to
conduct studies on the proper type of criteria necessary for
the incineration of certain waste types in the city. This
purpose is important, as proper studies need to be conducted
on the subject in order to protect the planning process and
the health, safety, and welfare of Monticello citizens.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion adopting interim ordinance placing an 18 -month
moratorium on burning certain waste types by incinerators
In the city of Monticello.
Under this alternative, City staff would have sufficient
time to develop criteria and regulations governing the
incineration process of certain waste types in the city.
Staff will soon receive a copy of the State rules
governing incineration and then begin preparation of City
regulations that fit the State regulations. In addition,
staff will be studying the resources that the State will
have available to regulate and actually monitor waste
L�
61
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
Incinerators. This is an important factor indeveloping
a prGyra , that can aclequaLeiy ajilorCw C01-iditionr that
might be attached to operation of an incinerator.
Motion to deny adoption of interim ordinance placing an
18 -month moratorium on burning certain waste types by
Incinerators in the city of Monticello.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council select alternative 01, as it
provides the City with sufficient time necessary to develop
proper rules and regulations governing operation of waste
incinerators.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Letter from Minnesota Pollution Control Agency indicating
establishment of infectious waste management rules; Copy of
interim ordinance.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-3898
Telephone (612) 296-6300 C��
MINNlV )IA IVYa
September 14, 1990
Dear Interested Person:
In 1989, the Minnesnt.a State "islature enacted the Infectious waste Control
Act. Its a result, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) developed rules
for the packaging, labeling, transport, storage, decontamination, and disposal
of infectious waste. 7bese rules will regulate off-site storage facilities,
off-site decontamination/disposal facilities, on-site incineration facilities,
and camnercial transporters.
Ibis is to notify you that the Infectious waste Management Rules (Minn. Rules
pts. 7035.9100 through 7035.9150) were adopted on August 28, 1990, and filed
with the Secretary of State on September 7, 1990. Minn. Rules pt. 7035.9130
requires the sutmittal of a Management Plan and Minn. Rules pt. 7035.9140,
subp. 1, item B, requires a Commercial 7Yarnsporter registration. 711e MPCA has
J developed h43naganent Plan farms and a Conealal 7tansporter Registration form
for your use. A separate form is required for each acLivity that yuu are
involved in and will be sent to you by request.
Minn. Rules pt. 7035.9140, subp. 1, item B, of the Infectious waste Kvogarr_nt
Rules, requires Management Plans to be sutmltted within 45 days of rule
adoption. All Plans =at be submitted to the M1PCA by November 15, 1990.
If you have any questions regarding the infectious Waste Mannagennnt Rules or
would like to request forms, please contact re at 612/296-7388.
Sincerely,
Laurie M3zner
Enforicanent Unit
Solid Waste Section
Ground Water and Solid Waste Division
IMnej
Regional Offices: Dululh • Brainerd • Dolroll Lakes 1 Marshall • Rochester 0?
//
Equal Opponunily Employer - Pdnmd on Recycled Papar 0?
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS THAT TITLE 7, HEALTH
AND SANITATION, OF THE CITY ORDINANCE BE AMENDED BY ADDING THE
FOT,T,)WTNr CHAPTER:
Chapter 7
WASTE INCINERATION
SECTION:
7-7-1:
Purpose and Finding
7-7-2:
Regulations
7-7-3:
Authority
7-7-4:
Term
7-7-5:
Effective Date
7-7-1: PURPOSE AND FINDINGS: The purpose of this ordinance is
to place a moratorium on burning of certain waste types
by use of incinerators in the city of Monticello. This ordinance
Is intended to allow the City time to conduct studies on the proper
type of criteria necessary for the incineration of certain waste
types in the city. This purpose is important, as the City Council
finds that proper studies need to be conducted on this subject in
order to protect the planning process and the health, safety, and
welfare of Monticello's citizens.
7-7-2: REGULATIONS:
(A) Interim Regulation:
1. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Title 10 of the
City Code, no burning of solid waste, hazardous waste, medical
waste, or special waste by use of an incinerator or hazardous waste
incinerator shall be allowed within the city either as a permitted
use or conditional use, nor will requests for such incineration
burning be considered by the City during the period of time the
City is conducting studies on the development of criteria for the
review and granting of requests for such incinerator burning.
2. As used herein, the following words shall have the meanings
defined herein:
"Hazardous waste" means any refuse, sludge, or other waste material
or combinations of refuse, sludge, or other waste materials in
solid, semisolid, liquid, or contained gaseous form which because
of its quantity, concentration, or chemical, physical, or
infectious characteristics may (a) cause or significantly
contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious
irreversible or incapacitating reversible illness; or (b) polo a
substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the
environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, or
disposed of or otherwise managed. Categories of hazardous waste
NA
Ordinance Amendment No.
Page 2
materials include, but are not limited to: explosives, flammables,
oxidizers, poisons, irritants, and corrosives. Hazardous waste
does not include source, special nuclear, or by-product material as
defined by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 as amended.
"Hazardous Waste Incinerator" means an enclosed device using
controlled flame combustion, a purpose of which is to thermally
break down hazardous waste and that neither meets the criteria for
classification as a boiler nor is listed or can be classified as an
industrial boiler.
"Incinerator" means any furnace or other device used in the process
of burning solid waste, hazardous waste, medical waste, or special
waste for the purpose of reducing the volume of the waste by
removing combustible material.
"Solid Waste" means garbage, refuse, and other discarded solid
materials, except animal waste used as fertilizer, including solid
waste materials resulting from industrial, commercial, and
agricultural operations, and from community activities. Solid
waste does not include earthen fill, boulders, rock, and other
materials normally handled in construction operations, solids, or
dissolved material in domestic sewage, or other significant
pollutants in water resources such as silt, dissolved or suspended
solids in industrial waste water effluents, dissolved materials in
irrigation return flows, or other common water pollutants.
3. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the use of incinerator
burning by incinerators lawfully permitted or presently in use
within the city.
7-7-3: AUTHORITY: This ordinance is adopted pursuant to the
authority granted to the City by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462.355, Subdivision 4.
7-7-4: TERM: This ordinance shall, unless otherwise extended,
terminate eighteen (18) months from its effective date.
7-7-5: EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance becomes effective upon
its passage and thirty (30) days after its publication
according to law.
Adopted this 24th day of September, 1990.
Mayor
CCity Administrator
O
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
Consideration of street name change for Lauring Lane, 7th
Street, and/or Country Club Road. (J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the last quarterly department head meeting, Roger Mack
suggested the City look into the possibility of changing one
or all of the names for Lauring Lane, 7th Street, and Country
Club Road. Ultimately, this will be a collector road or
service road that will run all the way from County Road 39 on
the west through town to County Road 118 on the east. It is
possible that we could define this street as a state aid route
upon reaching population 5,000. The current configuration
utilizing three names does cause some confusion, and it may be
best for the future to have a single name for this entire
route.
Currently, there are no addresses on Country Club Road, and
there are three addresses on 7th Street (Monticello Office
Products, Holiday Station, and Americ Inn). The addresses on
Lauring Lane are more numerous. Although the inconvenience of
an address change should be considered, it should not be the
ultimate determining factor in naming this entire collector
route.
It is possible to utilize two names rather than one such as
calling the route east of Highway 25 Lauring Lane and the
route west of Highway 25 Country Club Road or some other name.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to consider a single name
for the collector road running from West County Road 39
to County Road 118.
2. The second alternative would be to use two names for the
collector road such as Lauring Lane to the east and
Country Club Road or some other name to the west.
3. The third alternative would be to stick with the existing
configuration utilizing the three names Country Club
Road, 7th Street, and Lauring Lane. Sometime in the
future we would have to make a determination what the
name of tho road would be across Bronnan's property to
the west and whether or not we would continuo with
Lauring Lane across Maurice Hoglund's property on the
east.
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
STAFF RECOKMENDATION:
it is the staff recommendation that the laity Councii iirst
consider one name for the entire collector route. If the
inconvenience of the name change of Lauring Lane on the east
is an overwhelming factor, then we should opt for
alternative A2 and have the west collector route be one name
and the east another. After a decision by the City Council as
to which alternative to use, it would be possible to have the
Council, a committee, or a city-wide contest involving all the
citizenry to select the appropriate name or names.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
Consideration of resolution adoptinq a records retention
schedule. (K.D.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City has now reached the point where accumulation of
records has become a problem, as the basement of city hall has
reached its capacity for storage. As you may recall, adoption
of the General Records Retention Schedule formulated by the
Minnesota Department of Administration, along with the League
of Minnesota Cities and a task force made up of city officials
from around the state, was discussed at the February 12, 1990,
City Council meeting; however, because the retention schedule
proposed for adoption included such a vast amount of records,
it was decided that staff should first review the retention
schedule and adopt a schedule listing only those records we
are certain we will not need in the future.
This week I completed a brief inventory of liquor store
records and some city hall financial records in the basomont
(bank statements, cancelled checks, deposits, liquor store
daily receipts, etc.) After reviewing my notes of these
records, I discovered we could dispose of approximately 30
boxes in only these two categories. (This is just an
estimate, as I noted only what was written on the outside of
the box without opening each box and recording individual
files.)
According to Aileen McCormick of the Minnesota Department of
Administration, there are three ways in which to dispose of
records: 1) adopt sections of or the entire General Records
Retention Schedule (which is an ongoing schedule); 2) create
our own retention schedule (which is also an ongoing
schedule); or 3) receive approval of Application for Authority
to Dispose of Records (which is a one-time authorization for
disposal and should be used only for obsolete records which
are no longer generated).
Attor meeting with the City Administrator and reviewing my
inventory notes with him, we concluded that it might be best
to begin by adopting only the liquor store section of the
General Records Retention Schedule. The process for disposing
of records is as follows: Once Council adopts this section of
the retention schedule, staff completes a Notification of
Adoption of City General Retention Schedule form and mails it
to the Government Records Archivist (Minnesota Historical
Society). Once they sign and return this form to us
acknowledging our adoption of the schedule, we can destroy,
maintain, or transfer the records to the state archives as
indicated on the schedule. The only other form that must be
maintained by staff during the records retention process is
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
the Records Destruction Report, which is completed as we
destroy records and periodically mailed to the Minnesota
DeParLfaaj,L of Admit,iei:iation.
Beginning with a small portion of the General Records
Retention Schedule would enable staff to reach a more
manageable level of records in the basement, thereby providing
more space in which to work with the remaining records. Once
we better organize the basement records and determine which
financial records we can destroy and which we should keep, the
Council could then adopt a retention schedule for the
financial records, and we would follow the same procedure as
noted above once we receive acknowledgement of adoption from
the Government Records Archivist. Hopefully, the gradual
adoption of these schedules will create enough space to allow
us to continue transferring documents to our storage area in
the basement without finding an off-site storage area.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Adopt the resolution adopting the liquor store section of
the General Records Retention Schedule as formulated by
the Department of Administration and League of Minnesota
Cities.
2. Direct staff to create our own retention schedule for the
liquor store records and return to Council at a later
meeting for adoption.
3. Do not adopt a records retention schedule.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Even though some of our financial records are important to
retain for long periods of time and may never be destroyed,
most of our liquor store records are not referred to by staff
and are not necessary to keep any longer than noted on the
rotention schodulo; and because our basement storage area has
reached its capacity, staff recommends alternative al.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution for adoption; Copy of retention schedule
for liquor store records; Copy of Notification of Adoption
form; Copy of Records Destruction Roport.
to
RESOLUTION 90 -
RESOLUTION ADOPTING RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, M.S. 138.153 reads as follows:
"It is the policy of the legislature that the disposal and
preservation of public records be controlled exclusively by
Chapter 138 and by Laws 1971, Chapter 529, thus, no prior,
special, or general statute shall be construed to authorize or
prevent the disposal of public records at a time or in a
manner different than prescribed by such chapter or by Laws
1971, Chapter 529, and no general or special statute enacted
subsequent to Laws 1971, Chapter 529, shall be construed to
authorize or prevent the disposal of public records at a time
or in a manner different than prescribed in this chapter or In
Laws 1971, Chapter 529, unless it expressly exempts such
records from the provisions of such chapter and Laws 1971,
Chapter 529, by special reference to this section"; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Administration, along with the
League of Cities and a task force made up of city officials from
around the state, have developed a general records retention
schedule for cities; and
WHEREAS, the classification of records as herein described are
Included In the above-mentioned records retention schedule;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Monticelln City Council
does hereby adopt the liquor store section of Cho approved records
retention schedule developed by the Minnesota Department of
Administration as attached hereto and made a part of this
resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be submitted
to the Minnesota Historical Society.
Adopted this 24th day of September, 1990.
Mayor
City Administrator
C�
LL11111 NI
C league of minnesota cities
es
DATE: March 1, 1986
T0: City Managers. Administrators
r/�.s..Ad��mii�n��i��s��t�r���ators and Clerks
FROM: Helen Schenael, Ass4ociae—Di rector
SUBJECT: City C.enernl Records Retention Schedule
Over the past few years there has been an increasing need for guidelines
relating to how cities should manage their records. To fulfill that
need, the Minnesota Department of Admi nlstration, along with the League
of Cities and a task force made up of city officials from around the
state have developed a general records retention schedule for cities.
That schedule, which follows, lista minimum retention periods for city
records based on their administrative, fiscal, legal and historical
value. It lists types of records common to cities and states how lona
to keep them.
We feel this is a valuable document that all cities should have the
opportunity to ndopt and use. Cities may chose to adopt the schedule or
portions of it. Adoption of a records retention schedule is not
mandatory.
Enclosed is a flyer for distribution t o the npproprinte personnel in
your city. This will allow them to order the additional copies
necessary once your city has ndopted t he schedule. The flyer nlso lists
additional services avallnble from the Data and Records Management
Department.
If you have any Questions nbout the schedule. contact the Department of
Administration. Data and Records Mnnnptement Division at ]J] Sibley
STreat. Room 700, St. Paul, MN 55101 or call 296-07.56 or tool free
1-800-652-9747.
HMS:ctd
163 uivvor0it y avenue tsnet. et. onuL mmrn3aota 55101 ((31 2) 227.5600
CITY GENERAL RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE
PURPOSE OF THE GENERAL RETENTION SCHEDULE
The purpose of a records retention schedule is to provide a plan for managing
governmental records by giving continuing authority to dispose of records under
Minnesota Statutes 138.17.
This City General Records Retention Schedule establishes minimum retention
periods for city records based on their administrative, fiscal, legal and historical
value. It lists records series common to cities and states how long to keep them.
ADOPTING AND USING THE GENERAL SCHEDULE
1. To begin disposing of records according to the general schedule, you must
notify the Minnesota Historical Society that your city has officially adopted
the schedule. The enclosed form, "Notification of Adoption of City General
Retention Schedule," is used for this purpose.
Cities that have adopted the previous version of this general schedule must
also send notification when adopting this updated version.
2. You may adopt the schedule even though your office may not have all the
records listed on it. we recommend that you adopt the entire schedule.
However, if this is not possible you may adopt individual sections.
3. The Minnesota Historical Society will sign and return the Notification form
to you. You will then have the authority to dispose of your government records
as indicated on the schedule.
4. Compare the records in your office with the records listed on the schedule.
Retention periods listed on the schedule represent the minimum amount of
time that you must retain records. Once that retention period has been reached,
you may either destroy or transfer the records to the State Archives, as indicated
on the schedule. If you need to retain some records series longer than the
listed retention, you should establish an agency policy for those records.
3. Records identified on the schedule as archival may not be transferred to a
local historical society, museum, public library, or interested individual without
the specific, written permission of the State Archivist, Minnesota Historical
Society.
6. The retention stated on the schedule applies to any form of the record (paper,
computer tape or disk, microfilm, etc.). However, if you decide to change
the form of a record (for instance, you microfilm a paper record)ou MAY
not be authorized to dispose of the original record. If you are const e
changing the form of a record, contact the Division of Archives and Manuscripts
for procedures.
0
DESTRUCTION REPORTING
After you destroy records according to the general schedule, send a report to
the Minnesota Department of Administration and the Minnesota Historical Society
(M.S. 138. 17, Suoa. 7). Use a copy of the enclosed "Records Destruction Report"
(RM -00065) for this purpose. This report may be submitted annually or as records
are destroyed.
RECORDS NOT ON THE GENERAL SCHEDULE
Records not listed on this schedule cannot be destroyed without submitting either
an "Application for Authority to Dispose of Records" (PR -1) or a "Minnesota
Records Retention Schedule" (RM -00058).
The PR -I form is used to request one-time authority to dispose of records. A
reproducible copy of the PR -1 form is enclosed. Since an approved PR -I gives
you authority to dispose of only those records listed on the form, we recommend
that you use the PR -I only for obsolete records (records no longer being created).
For ongoing authority to dispose of records not listed on the general schedule,
complete a "Minnesota Records Retention Schedule." This form can be obtained
from the Data and Records Management Division.
RESOURCES
If
This schedule was developed by the Data and Records Management Division and
the Division of Archives and Manuscripts in cooperation with members of the
League of Cities, and was funded in part by a grant from the National Historical
Publications and Records Commission.
Questions about the schedule: Questions about archival records:
Department of Administrdtiun
Minnesota Historical Society
Data and Records Management Div.
Div. of Archives and Manuscripts
333 Sibley Street, Room 700
1500 Mississippi Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
St. Paul, MN 55101
612-296-3122
612-296-6980 or 1-800-652-9747
9
1.1�STORK '� November, 15.7
CATEGORY DEFINITIONS:
Records Series Description: A records series is a group of records filed together because they
relate to a particular subject.
Retention Period/Statute: The retention cited is the minimum amount of time a record must be kept.
The stated retention does not include the year the record originates. For example, if Record A
is filed by calendar year and it has a retention of 3 years, the disposal date for 1985 records
is January, 1989. Statutes listed here cite specific retention periods for the records series.
Archival: if a Y, meaning yes, appears in this column these records are eligible for transfer
to the State Archives in the Minnesota Historical Society after the retention period has expired
or when the agency no longer has need for them. Contact the Division of Archives and Manuscripts
of the Minnesota Historical Society for information on how to transfer archival records
(612-296-6980 or toll free 1-800-652-9747).
nates Practices Classifical_ion: This identifies records classified by the Government Data Practices
Act or other state or federal laws. The classification system includes: public, private,
confidential, nonpublic or protected nonpublic. More than one classification may apply.
Data Practices Statute: The statute or law which cites the data practices classification of the
records series.
a
LIQUOR STLRE
REQUEDS SPA7$q D 4fSeTP1'I0N
1. AUDIT REPO M - l ?IMY
2. AUDITM'S RMKF S - ANNUAL
3. BANK STATDONM
4. CANCELLED O1D0tS
5. CASH REGISIFR TAPES - DAILY SALES
6. OMM SNBS
7. DAILY RECEIPT PLENUMS
S. GENERAL UD(ER
9. INVEN1CItY SHEETS
10. RDCEIPT BOORS - DEPOSIT BOORS
11. RECEIPP AND DISBURSDIENr JOURNAL
12. TRANSFER SIMS - STOP
13. VDUM S, OAIMS, AND INVOICES
Paid on counail audit.
rrry Gam_ar.1 HUM= REIEN'rON 32U= Page 26
DA,1 PRACTICES 0AIA FRAC.
2 yrs.
N
Public
Permanent
N
Public
6 yrs.
N
Public
6 yrs.
N
Public
2 yrs.
N
Public
6 yrs.
N
Public
2 yrs.
N
Public
Permanent
N
Public
2 yrs.
N
Public
6 yrs.
N
Public
Permanent
N
Public
2 yrs.
N
Public
10 yrs.
N
Public
•*SEE OTHER =nONS OF THIS GP OMM SOMME FOR RDXFd)S SERIES NOT LIMED HERE.
O
0
Minnesota Historical Society
Division of Archives and Manuscripts NOTIFICATION OF ADOPTION
15Oo Mississippi Street OF
St. Paul, MN 55101 CITY GENERAL RETENTION SCHEDULE
612-296-6980 1-800-652-9747
1. Complete this form and send the original and 2 copies to the Government Records Archivist at the above address.
2. Destruction of records according to the general schedule is NOT permitted until this form is Signed by the
Minnesota Historical Society.
EM
Street Address
Telephone (include area code)
City, Zip Code
This is notify the Minnesota Historical Society that the city named above
has officially adopted the Minnesota City General Records Retention Schedule
(revised November, 1985). Cities are advised to adopt the entire schedule.
If this is not possible, individual sections may be adopted. ("x" the
appropriate items.)
[:]The City Adopts the Entire Schedule.
The City Adopts Only the Following Sections:
❑ Administration
❑ Elections
0 Permito and Licensee
❑ Assessing
❑ Finan ial/Accounting
❑ Personnel
❑ Bonds
0 insurance
❑ Planning and Zoning
❑ Building Inapections
❑ Library
0 Public Safety/Police and Fire Dept.
❑ Cemetery
❑ Liquor Store
0 Public Horns and Engineering
❑
❑ contracts,
❑ courts
❑ Peru* and Recreation
❑ Payroll
utilities
0 Vital Statistics
Nems/Title of City Official (print)
I Signature
of City Official Cate
The Minnesota Historical Society
acknowledges your Notification of
Adoption of the City General Retention
Schedule. You are authorized to
retain and dispose of records as
indicated on the Schedule.
Director or Designee, Minnesota Historical Society Date
DAM I1/85 0
Department of Administration
Data and Records Management Division
333 Sibley Street, Room 700 RECORDS DESTRUCTION REPORT
St. Paul, MN 55101
612-296-3122
Instructions
1. Use this form to report records destroyed under the authority of an approved records retention
schedule or an "Application for Authority to Destroy Records" (PR -I form).
2. Do not report records transferred to the Minnesota Historical Society.
3. Send the original of this report to the Chief Records Coordinator at the address above.
u. Send a copy of this report to: State Archivist, Minnesota Historical Society, 1500 Mississippi
Street, St. Paul, MN 55101.
5. For additional space, use reverse side.
Agency Division/Section (Date Report Submitted
Aadrese City, State, Zip
Person Reporting Destruction (Print or type) Phone ..
RECORDS DESTROYED
Retention Sch. Item Quantity- Inclusive Date
or PR -1 No. No. Record fkecrip[lon (Title) (Cu. rt.) Oates Destroyed
'VOLUME CHART 10 DCImmc Cum rCCI
Letter Site Dro.er . 1.5
Records Center Bo. a 1,0
315 Cara 12" Ro. a 0.1
Legal Site Dro.er . 2.0
12' % IY % 10"
4116 Cara 12" Ro. . 0.2
Shelving o' Letter . 2.7
Shelving a• Legal a 3.0
Transfer Caae . ZA
26• % 16" t I1"
!%B Cara IY Ru■ . 0.3
Printouts 12" lLaCY , 1.2!n
RR—CM65-01 (11/95)
7
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
to. Consideration and review of the proposed 1991 budget of the
SWC4. (R.W.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Each year the SWC4 cable commission, of which Monticello is a
member, adopts its own budget for the upcoming year. The
joint powers agreement of the SWC4 provides that the annual
budget shall be deemed approved by a member community unless
that community gives notice in writing that it intends to
withdraw from the commission membership. The City Council
does not actually have to approve this budget.
For the year 1991, the cable commission will see an increase
In its monies available through the additional 2% franchise
fee now being paid by Jones Intercable for a total of 5%. In
addition, the commission no longer has a full-time staff
person (Barb Guffey) but has contracted independently for
administrative services. Contracting these services will save
the commission approximately $24,000 annually.
Normally in the past, the City of Monticello has not realized
any additional revenue from the franchise fees, as the fees
were used to offset the commission's expenses. It is
anticipated that in the future, the City of Monticello will
actually realize additional revenue above the commission's
expenditures due to the increase in the franchise fee and the
reduction in personnel cost. The commission as a whole
approved the attached budget, which proposes to incorporate
funding for a government access pilot program, for one of its
member cities, which would provide for cable casting of city
council meetings to subscribers in that city. The $25,000
amount in the budget will not only purchase equipment for the
project but would also provide for the staff necessary to
operate the equipment during the government meetings. By
being a member of the commission, the City of Monticello can
be one of the communities in the future to receive equipment
for broadcasting City Council meetings if the City desires.
City Council does not need to take any formal action, but I
bellove It would be a good idea for the City to ratify the
City's participation and the commission budget for 1991.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Ratify tho budget.
2. Withdraw from the commission.
C
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1 recommend, as a member or the commission, that the Council
ratify the budget for the upcoming year. If you feel the City
of Monticello would like to be considered for the pilot
program, please let me know and I will so inform the
commission. I believe there are a couple of communities that
are interested for the year 1991, but we could be put on the
list for the near future.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of commission budget; memo from Mr. Tom Creighton, legal
counsel for the commission.
12
SIIERBURNE/WRICHT C0UNTY
CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Monticello City Hall. 250 East Broadway. Monticello. Minnesota 55362
BARBARA GUFFEY Phone 16121 295.2611
Cance Metro 1612) 333-5739
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Member Municipalities of the
Sherburne/Wright County Cable
Communications Commission
FROM: Thomas D. Creighton
Legal Counsel
DATE: August 28, 1990
RE: Cable Commission Budget Proposal for 1991
The Joint Powers Agreement of the Sherburne/Wright County
Cable Communications Commission requires that the Commission
submit to its Member Cities on an annual basis its proposed
budget for the coming fiscal year. A Member Citv does not need
to aoorove this budaet. Instead, the Joint Powers Agreement
provides the budget shall be deemed approved by a member unless,
prior to October 15, the member gives notice in writing to the
Commission that it is withdrawing from the Commission. There-
fore, if you have any concerns or questions regarding the
Commission budget, please contact me at the above address prior
to October 15, or the attached budget will be deemed approved by
your City.
As you can see from the enclosod budget, the Commission has
made some significant modifications in its expenditures for the
1991 fiscal year. Not only has the Commission increased the
monies available for administration in the Sherburne/Wright
County area as a result of its negotiated additional 2% franchise
fee, but the Commission has significantly cut its exponditures
for staff support of the Commission. The Commission no longer
has a full-time staff, but has contracted independently for
administrative services. This amounts to an annual savings of
approximately $26,000.
As a result the Commission is able to not only accelerate
its repayment of the $50,000 borrowed from the City of Elk River
SWC 4: B0 Lake • Bullnto • Cokato • Dassel • Delano • Elk River �0
Manto Lnko • Monticee0 • Rockford • Watorlown
(saving approximately $8,000 in interest), but the Commission is
able to begin, finally, the providing of some exciting services
to the Member Cities.
Specifically, the Commission has proposed the Pstablishment
of a pilot project in one of its Member Cities which would
provide for the cablecasting of City Council meetings to sub-
scribers in a Member City. The Commission will closely evaluate
the efficiency and effectiveness of such cablecasting during the
pilot project year and will subsequently consider the allocation
of additional monies to place such projects in other Member
Cities. The project as proposed will not only purchase the
necessary equipment for the pilot project, but will also allocate
resources for the staff necessary to operate such equipment
during government meetings. This project is an example of an
effort which could not possibly be undertaken by an individual
city on its own. By pooling its resources, the Commission is
able to begin the establishment of such projects on a year to
year basis in Member Cities to further utilize the cable system
to better serve the subscribers of the area.
The Commission will keep its Member Cities apprised of the
progress of the government programming pilot project. Assumi ng
the proposed budget remains as proposed, the Commission will
discuss and designate the pilot city at its November meeting.
Should any Member City wish to be considered as a pilot project
for the cablecasting of its City Council and other government
meetings, please contact me prior to the regular meeting of the
Commission scheduled for Wednesday, November 14, 1990. You may
contact me at:
Bernick 6 Lifson, P.A.
Parkdale 1, Suite 200
5401 Gamble Drive
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
(612) 546-1200
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the enclosed
proposed budget, please feel free Lo contact me. Again, your
City Council need not formally approve this budget. However,
should you disapprove of this budget, please communicate your
concerns to me as soon as possible. Should the Commission not be
able to reconcile your concerns, it would be necessary for your
city to formally withdraw from the Commission prior to October
15, 1990, or the budget will be deemed approved by your city.
Again, please feel free to contact me if you have any
questions.
-2-
1991 PROPOSED BUDGET
SHERBURNE/WRIGHT COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
1990 Balance Forward
$ 3,200.00
1990 Franchise Fee Payable in 1991 (estimated)
68.000.00
Total:
$ 71,200.00
Adminstrative
$ 12,000.00
Stationery and supplies
200.00
Telephone (long distance)
200.00
Postage
350.00
Travel, Conferences and Schools
3,000.00
Dues and Memberships
275.00
Audit
400.00
Commission Expenses
1,600.00
Legal
6,000.00
Accelerated Repayment of Loan
20,828.00
Unallocated Contingency
1,347.00
Government Access Programming
Pilot Project - one city
(includes equipment and staffing)
$ 25.000.00
Total: S 71,200.00
0
zyoo - 1991
COMPARISONS
$ 63'8*2.77 v rz.zvo.00
�
�
Repayment to Elk ni.u,
acxvu"leu S 12.667.00
plonvmu Aocazmouteu v 10.541.67 v 20,827.50
�
�
LO,
1990
1*»1
Budget
Proposed
Administrative
29'000.00
o'noo.ov
pcoA
1'299.20
---
FICA
2,177.90
---
Health, Dental, Lice' Disability
3'000.00
Worker's Comp. comn.
s14.00
--
office General a^nnziem
200.00
200.00
Legal
o'noo.00
o'uuo.ov
Telephone
.
soo oo
zoo . nn
Postage
275.00
350.00
Travel, Conferences
a'non.nn
3'000.00
Printing, euuzisxioe
280.00
---
Insurance
3'100'00
---
Dues membership
275.00
275.00
Audit
400.00
400.00
cvmmiomivv oxnonwea
1'aoo.00
1,600.00
Government xrcoas Pilot Project
---
25'000.e0
Accelerated Repayment of
ozx River Loan
m.s*z.or
20,828.00
Unallocated o*"ti"go"ov
O -Q
1.3 7.00
$ 63'8*2.77 v rz.zvo.00
�
�
Repayment to Elk ni.u,
acxvu"leu S 12.667.00
plonvmu Aocazmouteu v 10.541.67 v 20,827.50
�
�
LO,
C
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
11. Consideration of proclaiming Wednesday, September 26, as
Toastmasters Day. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Toastmasters International, an organization promoting self
confidence and public speaking abilities, is putting on a
state-wide membership campaign. Governor Perpich has
proclaimed September 26 through September 29 as Toastmasters
Week in Minnesota, and the local chapter of Toastmasters will
be hosting a demonstration meeting on Wednesday, September 26
and requested the City's proclamation support as Toastmasters
Day in Monticello.
The only action needed by the Council would be to recognize
the Monticello Chapter and proclaim Wednesday, September 26,
as Toastmasters Day if the Council does not have any
opposition.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of letter received by Mayor Maus; Copy of Toastmasters
membership benefits.
13
Dear Fellow Community Members:
We'd like to extend an invitation for you to visit the Sher -Wright
Toastmaster Club. You ask, "Why would I want to?" Please read on and I'll
tell you why you should visit a Toastmasters meeting at least once.
p TOASTMASTERS IS . . .
i�
The world's leading non-profit organization .
flovnted to helping people develop their. Cor_sunication and Leadership
skills . . .
BENEFITS . . .
• Cain Self Confidence
•.Speak more Effectively
! Improve Listening habits
• Develop Leadership skills
• Learn to Share skills
• Develop Inter -Personal 5PI 115
• Learn with Enjoyment
• Receive Recognition for achievement
THE PROGRAM . . .
• Business Meeting - With the focus on Leadership Skills
• Table Topics - Which involve the practice of Impromptu Speaking
• Prepared Speeches - Members focus on developing specific communication
skills
• Evaluations - Members receive Immediate constructive feedback
AND MORE . . .
1 • Club members have other opportunities for growth and development
through participation in educational Conferences, Contests and
Leadership positions.
4
• Community Involvement is possible for members desiring additional
Leadership growth.
The Sher -Wright Toastmasters meet on Wednesday evenings at 7:00 p.m. at the
Monte Club. If you'd like to attend, you may just "show up," of make other
arrangements with one of the following members:
We hope to see you at our next meeting •••• Wednesday night!
Sincerely,
Sher -Wright Toastmasters
dome
Work
David Scott
878-2012
295-1311
Ray Dlnius
295.5578
119-2218
Jeff McAndrew
125••1210
295-1070
Mary Bray
295••7719
Joanne Barthel
267-2721
120-9880
We hope to see you at our next meeting •••• Wednesday night!
Sincerely,
Sher -Wright Toastmasters
SEPTEMBER 14, 1990
MAYOR KEN MALS
CITY HALL
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
DEAR MR. MAUS,
THE BLITZ IS ON!! MINNESOTA TOASTMASTERS ARE PUTTING ON A STATE-WIDE MEMBERSHIP
CAMPAIGN. GOVERNOR RUDY PERPICH HAS PROCLAIMED SEPTEMBER 26-29 "TOASTMASTERS WEEK"
IN MINNESOTA, AND THE MONTICELLO TOASTMASTERS ARE DOING THEIR BEST TO SPREAD THE
WORD!
TIIE MONTICELLO "SHER-WRIGHT" TOASTMASTERS WILL BE HOLDING A DEMONSTRATION MEETING
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, AND WE WOULD BE HONORED 10 HAVE YOU PROCLAIM WEDNESDAY
"TOASTMASTERS DAY." ENCLOSED 1S MORE INFORMATION ON OUR CLUB. TIIANK YOU FOR
YOUR TIME.
1C
RF MC ANDREW
MONTICELLO TOASTMASIERS
ADMINISTRATIVE VICE-PRESIDENT
0
Your Toastmasters membership provides these benefits...
• A uniqur nx•an%of learning and imptovinR your ( onvnunicative abili-
ti('% within an aunu5phrm 4,l h11ow5hip and fun with yuur I(dlow
loastnlastors Club nwinlx'rs.
• Unllnllle(I opprxtuflit in lot Ixvulnal and of ( upational advallmnenl
bawd un improved abilities and expand -1 experience.
• txlxvien(e in leadership develnpn VnI 111MUgh training and (luh
involvement.
• Professionally prelLllC(I e(lucatiunal material% and re5uurces on s{x-ak-
ing, listening, (iuus%ion, parliamentary Procedure, audio-visual ttYh-
nique% and (onlerem a and nleel ing pftx l vlun's.
• the 10a%tnla5lel FnagaFine— every rnomil rhe h4withwef pmvitfc�
new imighl%on commuoi(atiun Iry hniques, idea%and opinion%.
• Conlinuing practi(e anti MilIKure Ill Mxuld (omnlunilation lech-
nidues.
• Incted,a4l (onfidell(r, abillly III orgalll/e logo al thought and pr('%e 11
It %C1f-aSttrred1y, and a Ixvter 1 rndvislan(IIIIg of human felatl(IIK.
• Affdiatim, wilh an internationally lenuwned educational ulganiiam m,
We ask you to share and increase the benefits you gain
through Toastmasters by...
• AwNtrng fellow nx'nlx•rs nl develnpulg thou 4 011 11xuli(J6011 and
leadership abllnle% 1% You tfevelup yuur own.
• I lellling your dub nlaintanl the 1(41511141%11'15 %landatd of e4, ellen(e Ill
Ill ogratmninganti adrrlini%Iration.
• Pruvirbngleader%hipinfile I.lubateveryop{xulunny.
• Unimng your I(4KIlful%lem er{x'rien(e In taAe an involved role m
( unxnunrty allail5.
• Shaung your 10.1%oll,1%lels e%Ix9lelu a by telling 4,11(45 almml Ow pr (,.
gl and and Invmng 11I.—In I4, Join,
• MAIngluamina ter%anenjoyableandwunhwhdeexlx'nen(elolyour•
%ell and others by p oi(v ling 11e 111.1%11141%tef% image in evelyd,ly huS'
IVIS%, SIX 1.11, and (onllllumly %Ituallolls.
Toastmasters International
e)AH) Nl)1III Cafoul A\,viit w
Mix 1044
ti,u11fI Ana, ('lllilul ni,I 92111
0
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
12. Consideration of final payment on Improvement No. 90SW-1,
concrete sidewalk and appurtenant work. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Witco Construction has completed the repairs and replacement
to the sidewalks on the grid system. The bid was based upon
the replacement or repair of 9,850 sq ft of sidewalk and
appurtenant work with a proposed cost of $21,725. As you may
recall, this was about 958 of the actual measured project, as
we felt that some residents may repair their own sidewalk. In
addition, we added three sidewalk sections to the grid that
needed some repair.
The actual quantity of sidewalk replaced was 11,351.95 sq ft
at a total cost, including appurtenant work, of $24,459.07.
The contractor has been paid $13,653 with the first partial
payment, leaving a balance due of $10,806.07.
a. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to make final payment to
Witco, Inc., of St. Cloud, Minnesota, in the amount of
$10,806.07 pending receipt of lien waivers and proper
state documents.
a
2. The second alternative would be not to make final payment
to Witco at this time. This does not appear to be
appropriate, as the work is in place and complete.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that
City Council authorize final payment to Witco in the amount of
$10,806.07 as outlined in alternative il. The concrete work
done by Witco has been of excellent quality. The few small
problems we've had with the sodding are being rectified to the
City and property owners' satisfaction.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
14
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
13. Consideration of purchasinq streetscape banners in conjunction
with Chamber of Commerce Marketinq and Communications Plan.
(J. O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you may know, an integral part of the streetscape design
included development of banners to be hung from banner arms
located on each decorative light. It just so happens that
staff was developing cost estimates for banners when we heard
that the Chamber of Commerce was considering the same thing.
Council is asked to determine if a banner system should be
developed to top off streetscape; and if so, is this an
opportunity to coordinate City efforts to develop a banner
system with Chamber of Commerce efforts to develop a unified
marketing strategy for the local business community?
Some months ago, the Monticello Chamber of Commerce recognized
that the local retail and service providers need to develop a
coordinated marketing communications effort for the goods and
services available in the city of Monticello. In response to
this need, a group of individuals made up of Steve Johnson,
Ken Maus, Linda Mielke, Barb Schwientek, and Don Smith began
work on a marketing and communications plan for local
businesses. Below are some of the major goals and objectives
of the marketing plan.
The major goals of the plan are to create a marketing
communications plan that:
(a) is consistent with Montic ello's image, positioning,
and needs;
(b) enlists support and financial backing of a wide
range of local merchants;
(c) applies to current and future communication needs;
(d) enhances the imago and success of Monticello's
business community.
The marketing program will emphaoLzo an image that includes
tho following:
(a) quality customer service with hometown
friendliness;
(b) goods and services that aro good values;
(c) a good assortment of products and services;
15
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
(d) a thriving business community is beneficial to a
progressive city;
(e) conveniently located, easy to get to.
Businesses interested in participating in the unified
marketing program are being asked to contribute a portion of
what they already spend on advertising. I am not sure to what
extent the group has received financial commitments.
The research conducted by the Chamber included a review of
communities similar to Monticello that have developed
successful, coordinated marketing campaigns. It was found
that those communities that were successful also demonstrated
a cooperative relationship between the City and the
organization sponsoring the unified marketing effort.
It is not proposed that the City make a direct financial
contribution via the general fund, but rather it is proposed
that the City of Monticello contribute to the program by
working with the Chamber organization toward development of a
streetscape banner system. As you will note on the copy of
the program implementation plan, one goal is to establish
visually a "unique Monticello" experience with light post
banners throughout the entire commercial sector and community
and consider changing colors with the seasons. The budget for
this item is $2,000 to $5,000.
In addition, the City might consider investing a portion of
the liquor store advertising budget toward the unified
marketing concept. The present liquor store marketing budget
is about $4,000 of which Council may wish to contribute $500
to $800 toward the plan.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to purchase streetscape banners in conjunction
with the Chamber of Commerce Marketing and Communications
Plan with the cost not to exceed 809 of $5,000.
If Council accepts the notion that the City would have
developed banners in the first place and this is a good
opportunity to combine efforts with the local business
community toward dovolopment of a positive commercial and
city image, then this option should be solectod. This
alternative calls for City financing of 808 and Chamber
financing of 208 of the cost of the banners. This cost
sharing formula may make sense, as it is the same as the
strootscapo assessment formula. Under this alternative,
16
c
Council Agenda - 9/24/90
the banner design would be developed by the Chamber of
Commerce with City participation. The final design would
be subject to City approval.
It is expected that the banner design will contain the
City Logo and the slogan "Monticello is your kind of
place."
2. Motion to deny purchase of streetscape banners in
conjunction with the Chamber of Commerce Marketing and
Communications Plan.
If Council is not convinced that the City should develop
streetscape banners, then this option should be selected.
The Chamber of Commerce would have the option of
financing the entire cost to develop banners.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative 91. If it is true that Council
would have authorized development of streetscape banners, then
staff recommends working with the Chamber toward development
of a banner system that is integrated with Chamber efforts to
develop a unified marketing plan that projects a positive
image of the community.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Excerpts from Marketing Communications Plan.
17
"ONE HOUR FOR MONTICELLO`
J A vYtal cooperative opportunity
to,posttiori Monticello for growth and success
in a changing world
I,
Monticello Chacber of Ca.m.eree
t
Promotions and Advertising Comittee
Septenber, 1990
i
• n,d sc7
Monticello Chamber
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 192 '
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Phone (612) 295.2700
Dear Monticello Area Supporter:
of Commerce
%. As we enter the '90s•, 1t is clear that the future of business in small
towns is changing._ It is also true,that the future of small towns lies in
their business success. That is what we invite you to explore today--
Monticello's future success and the necessary steps to achieve,it..
,Following is a summary of extensive work done in the last few months. It
'evolved.from a general feeling that many of'our residents' perceptions
'about Monticello goods and services were incorrect. The conclusions of our
preliminary research support what many of 'us have intuitively known for.
some time.• Thus, we began our work. '
The next question` that a`rose.ras, 'Nhat .do`we :do about these .
�,mtsconceptions?" Feeling that none of us had, the time nor tiie expertise to
examine this question, we found a professional 'organization that could more -
efficiently gather information and recamnend a plan of action. That
organization,is Sfmons Allyn Marketing C o=nieations.
We are very pleased with the work that Simons Allyn has done. Its study
l� and marketing plan state in a concrete fashion some of the realities of our
situation. More importantly, a 'road map' implementation plan outlines the
directions we should take to position Monticello positively in a very
' competitive, changing environment.
At the end of this you will find a participation agreement with your
Tw' suggested cooperative cost. Your signed agreement will give your business,
1 your community, and you a headstart on success for the '90s. We look
forward to your cooperation and your success.
Sincerely yours,
Steve Johnson
Committee Chair
0
"Ynpr hour for Monticello"
GROWING WiTH THE GOOD LIFE IN MONTICELLO.
From 1980 to 1987 Monticello grew faster than any other non -metro
city of its size in the state. While that fact may not be startling to any
area resident who has witnessed Monticello's population explosion, it does
symbolize the challenge facing this community in the next decade.
While Monticello's rapid population growth might have signified a
corresponding boom in the amount of expendable dollars area residents spent
in Monticello, that is not necessarily the case.
Indeed, many of those dollars are "leaking" out of Monticello into
surrounding areas. Attracted to "the good life" and security of small town
life in Monticello, many new residents are equally attracted to the nearby
shopping hubs of St. Cloud or the Twin Cities.
Early in 1990 the Monticello Chamber of Commerce appointed the
Promotions and Advertising Committee to study the "dollar drain" to near -by
shopping hubs. in addition, the Committee developed long-term strategies
to promote local businesses and services and to Counter the perception that
the availability of those goods and services is limited and overpriced.
Represented by all facets of the business community, members of the
Advertising and Promotions Committee include:
Steve Johnson (chair), Johnson's Department Store;
Ken Maus, Maus Foods;
Linda Mielke, Security Financial Banking and Savings;
Dave Peterson, Monticello Ford -Mercury;
Barb Schwientek, Monticello/Big Lake Coimnuntiy Hospital;
Don Smith, Monticello Times,
Realizing that the task necessitates the support of the entire
business community. the committee identified several goals:
Communicate to area residents the benefits of shopping and
conducting business in Monticello;
Change existing perceptions that the range of goods and services
in Monticello is limited and prices are high;
Develop long-range marketing objectives that will be supported by
the entire business community;
Target different needs of new and long-time Monticello residents.
With objectives clearly formed, the Chamber contracted with Simons
Allyn Marketing Communications, Inc. to conduct research and develop
marketing strategies. The result is an unprecedented opportunity for you
to promote Monticello and its goods and services.
0
L
.„.:TICLLLC. THE KARKET FOR YOU.
More than doubling in size since 1980, Monticello's current
population is approximately 4,054. It is projected that Monticello's
Qopulation will continue to grow, in large part due to its location in the
growth corridor' between St. Cloud and the Twin Cities.
Rich in historical tradition and with a progressive attitude,
Monticello's past growth can also be attributed to its close proximity to
the Twin Cities and the construction of NSP's nuclear power facilities.
Area residents are appreciative and protective of Monticello's small
town atmosphere, and its market can be further characterized as:
a young, family-oriented population;
median age is 27.4;
86% of all residents own their own hone;
median income of 135,154;
I� part of both the St. Cloud and Twin Cities mass media community;
over 554 of area residents commute more than 15 miles to work.
Strongly attracted to the less hectic pace and affordable life style
that Monticello provides, there is a excellent opportunity for market
rq ath by capturing the attention of our many new residents, developing
tt
N077th
loyalty. and securing their life—long buying habits.
C
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL OF US.
Monticello is poised for increased profits throughout the entire
business community with a pro -active marketing approach. A coordinated
effort among the financial, professional, and retail areas will provide the
most sound method of moving Monticello forward and will address the
challenges of the 1990s.
Our opportunities are outstanding and include:
Steady population growth guarantees future market opportunities;
Local population is supportive and committed to 'the good life°
in Monticello;
Positive qualities reflect small town way of life --friendliness,
security, good education, progressive;
Civic and business leaders have identified long-term goals rather
than a quick -fix as most beneficial path.
As a community leader, you have the opportunity to join in a shared
promotional campaign designed to produce results for your organization and
the community as well. Participants will -BUTT -their own market awareness
through a customized marketing program tailored for Monticello's unique
audience. In addition, the entire community will benefit from our
coordinated, city-wide effort.
This customized program will target families 25-49 with one primary
message that promotes the goods and services in the financial,
professional, and retail communities and with additional messages about the
high quality of life available in our community.
GHAT RONTICcLLO THNKS.
Part of its contract with Simons Allyn to develop a plan for
marketing strategies included conducting qualitative research in the form
of two focus group discussions.
Held at the Monticello Public Library on July 19, 1990, the
discussions provided an opportunity for area residents, selected randomly,
to respond to questions about the range and quality of goods and services
available in Monticello. Their thoughts are summarized here:
There is a strong sense of pride and affection for Monticello;
Residents are very attracted to the friendly and secure small
town way of life;
Monticello was characterized as a progressive community, not a
dying community as participants felt many small towns are;
The range of professional and financial services was deemed good;
There was some concern about limited medical specialists;
Many noted limited selection of retail goods and high prices in
comparison to nearby major shopping hubs;
St. Cloud was cited as number one choice for shopping, followed
by the Minneapolis area;
Respondents voiced dismay about empty mall;
Respondents had difficulty remembering past advertising or
promotional efforts of financial, professional, retail groups;
Participants responded most favorably to messages about
Monticello that were warm, focused on friendliness, small town,
home town, family atmosphere.
MARKETING TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE FUTURE.
The next year holds great promise for Monticello businesses and
services, with more promotion and increased high awareness advertising.
Our marketing strategy focuses on one thing: increased business.
That means increased profits. That's where you come in. Here's our mutual
plan for success.
1. Create promotional campaign aimed at Monticello residents and
designed for impact. An umbrella campaign, all messages will
feature the theme "Monticello. Your kind of place.'
The campaign will include print, radio, outdoor, direct mail,
in-house collateral materials for all participants.
Outdoor. Provides efficient, high -frequency, high visual
mph act to our mobile target audience.
Print. Provides detail and specifics within a defined
geographic area to eliminate waste. Captures specific
interests through targeted section placement.
Radio. Maximizes frequency of our message among target
q group and utilizes radio's intrusive ability to reach
audiences in any location.
Direct Mail. Reaches very precise audience with message and
details with little waste.
In-house collaterals. Signage, countercards, buttons, and
premiums support, maximize message at multiple, precise
locations.
2. Create a "unique Monticello" experience. Begin this year with
light -post banners throughout entire commercial sector and
community. Expand in future with unique architectural standards
and signage.
3. Develop special event/promotional calendar for businesses and
services that supports campaign, establishes consistency,
year-long marketing. Include tie-in activities for financial,
professional, retail groups.
4. Conduct on-going direct mail campaign to new residents.
Coorainste with existing wewcomer program. Include general
information about retail, financial, and professional services.
Include incentives from individual business/services to attract
traffic.
5. Conduct customer service, quality traininq sessions for owners
and managers.
6. Conduct market analysis and pricing surve,Y. This is necessary
to establish benchmarks to measure against. 0
A r�
i.
r." FT?WICIAL SVST(M
btl/tt/CO 00_:'t6:110
iourn.*l
PP411T OATE VENDOD'
C LAII �T.
GENEPAL CHECKING
fj 1.,P1W et'COITI)
711 PRAT) 0 P-6& 'ljT HAL: T 17'7.36
303:2 06/31/90 7.S. OOS HAS T E v
210 P*STA60' ''$00:00'
13 (Ij 13 1 190 MM O(PA6>1' OF PIA-9PAL
iie 0&TePCP-L-;.T/ATV/.StJ0Y Pe Ij.00_
307 it. fl)l? 1 /90 STAT:
TV FlRf-Ell's gIcA WIN 6--l6
lqr, S.TIT
lbe
2 2'? ;-fPEMEtl'S FICA W H 8.76
7-3.96 -
fg,) MINMESOTgk DEPAPTMENT
235 PERIOTT/SAMOSEPO EAST 150.00
3t,316 t-6/31190 StFFERt/01AIJE
90076 PFIMBICASSF—TE TAPES/C .0.25
30317 01/11/90 f4l)tJV/JEWFL
.90077 011MUHENT' RECYCLE SIM 9.12
30310 00/11/90 903Eirom
330 041LEAOE EXPENSE 42.00
307 19 07/31/90 CITY OF MOLE LAICE
301 Rf,3 fts/i O'Ne.4i 13.30
'PEE/$
30310 03131/00 C I TV 00 MAMIE LAKE
301 REG A00ERSOM 11.50
77.00 $CHECK TOTAL
30120 09/31/90 MIN-JFSCITA PLANNING A
360 MEMBERSHIP OUES/GAPV A 20.00
303:0 03111/40 folrMtSOT A Pt ANPJING A
ISO rA(m#epSmT;, VIEW) 041 10.00
40.00 6CRECK 10TV.
C1037, 0$11,140 mm OJPT OF TVA01—T—E
156 RTO TF170-VOODFICNA9 —160.00
30177 09131190 JANIS A. 84LOGW
000?9_0AVP0LL_0E0LlCTI0rJS 236.40
Qloli4 9, 04C.1�04
TOTAL
A r�
RF, ti P, P. L Q: 14 F t '1 .11
4)9/10/90 'OPP.9)W SMITATI-10
1.2 AOG G.Ar'�IWH CONTPA 11
161-67
In)?S 09!10!110 A$TFCH
371 SEAI.Co.&TINC. PROJIEC )0.64)3.16
Alo, .-I '?F N&IIJOAt
•115 WATfPCPtF�/'!lJ`WI4Tv P 15540
JAI29 09/19190 MQtJ-fjCFI.l.Q At)fm.%L CO
195 00.3 P000 s irifiliEl. -_
INS -es
3O+?? 09h01911 %IPTG41l f:MQMTN k401U)
219 ?PJD MAL; T4VES/VPATT
1?0. ts
3111311 0.1/1^/110 1fjn01•A.dtl
A 'krJI%IAI. b10*TT0fJ$ WCr
?h I.0f.
1 0911?190 are READY MI%
C.AfA-;"E
30+'^ 01/';/90 A M I P I C. A I N A T T C- IJ A L, 6A
sc":'.Fees
10 1'. no
4 4 c au pis, to'. 64
7 o.n. R•;%'% C.Al
t.* All -SJ 0 -it
im: 41f "1 14 % r1w:t".. 6A
1 0.0. Bovo rqs
3rj:?apSPIC64 tiATLO.16t 6r
G.O. 900 CCES
In332 09/ V^ f9k. M' it IC A4 tJA-104AI. eh
SOMI) 9 F 1
701. . 00
4,0- 0! . fIJ R•
7 -3 .1). F E'S
i . I .1..j
30!3? On I I :, tkLl IMlTC'fi' A'd -I&TTV)lAL 011
t G.O. 611.11 F 'SS
7>ft.25
- ..
1 .939.. 00
•CHECK T'
..- - . -
30333 1-9/17190 AN14%IJOALS Y(TIRINAPV
302 Ver 6:jtSIAfJtMAL COMTO 100.00
s, n91'1 14/90 814. LAPI LIJ14(kIP
Ile IM09*0%,fi40p e•
-').00
00/1^/911 1-11), ff-5.4,
3 3 x P - Pi
30336 091 I.Pi9O 01ITC-3tVATER. TELEPHOM
26 IlEtEP"ONE CM&POES
e1).30
3,(1336 00'/IjIVQ 4#.T0(;rwAfF.R TELEPHOts
26-TELOPHOPIE CHARGES
47.Ift
1, f. QJ i I , I gn rP"Ietsvmo'j
76 I'viftwQfIf C, t4 A 0 C, t S
Fk A 0, 1 I'D I fl-: 14 % fe P TILFOPON
:n TF.I.Ii-fAla h IA*reA
1,, L % I? J,)A 4C P I C.f?r %td, I 10 11 k E 0_'MPL'._
24-IfIlpletm-9. rp-ap'llf's-
09
o'I :4 0 09/109/1?/!.qw?'Q rqL g pmoti
24 rEt e Pm�ltjf C 14 MI 9 ;
%6.14
7 () ',/I? 0qn 4kc W1614k TfLjpml)%
74 T [L tr pwr$11 rMAogfS
?9.00
09/1 !.Iqv SF !brzw4Tfv TfLIP"Ori
?h jt-.!PHVYJJ CNAOOIS
11.50
T'k L
Ir r
16 for., 494. 1
c .,jh 00
?.0:
Vk- f 0•
PI)
10 -.J%y ; t (1- *40?1
24 1 f L -1 Aro!}
6kC FINANCIAL SYMM,
09112/00 19:05: I 1
04 15bt'r%,Iffl1#%t
OATS,
�pf St. 'J
A wh, rs r
CLAIM
C,-PWAI. CfiFd:KICJ6
30337 0?112190 cop.pr)w SANITATION
b? SALES TAY. DVEIjk,: 1,.5..749.63..
's rf�, ...i 'A
r 1: ft it" m
736. oc.
90 C- 16- 1 F S- AMEPTI-k.
'0 ADVEDT Ess".3/13I)s
.00
30)60 015,-OtINT $01
51 SOf'W"S1C(,m*Ll r(.R
15.00
:'I A- -.A(-n--
303h 017J1?/90 C 1. 1.-'0, v.
so cAsscr E 1ALICS/cou"Cl
I f. I on
09/17,10 c4s"hri
7r. Crpf, OEPT. PfPdkT*S
610.?L
0- 1. MA
j,!, IwFf- Cg*Jrig' SAI.A0i
1 7.00
HA% 1 S 1vtt L 0.4
'?S jtjrn
$-I . Lb': P
17s.56
tCMECK TejTA'.
)4117190 MFDMf S /,IF P.PV
Of Ljf%9ARV CLEANING SEOV
227.50
149G1.Uv0 f9A'J1P11PrArI
Sh AVG POS 94 4.
103&1 09jI1190 t0fPS',fH1)ANjTl1C
704 INFO CENTSP SALAPY
151.01
10341 Dgtl?/Qn i fFOSSP4/)ANET fE
204 INFO CFNIIR IALAP'i
10P.03
-'*MICII 1-iT1�
W.1%ft 09/17/90 Itfv
327 mTL'A(',t: 9 0FOW
55 . c1r.
0v12/•)0 L4.,fCv1jc.mN
322 MILEAGE EXPENSE
L5.00
O)43 041/12/90 LIAACH/JOHN
3?7 lAtI.1 AGF cipflist
t;.4?
103LO 0 91171 '41) 1.9- 61:41JOMN
!77 MTLIAGF F)DEMSE
t3.50
. — . _ . .
. I ?! . 110
70 0010;I11
-06 loti(p SLIP01 e piwr*.s
%1•.7.9
3041) L% U) 1 90 MAPfC- -PKvv-
106 COPi RAA.F.klCirf M#L%.
52.00
303L9 C -411 ,'t9 4�141klsss 6con.
.()4 onrAo"00 s. -C JoIs'(fu
.q 9 0
IL Tj I�r+
1•.1170-0 'p, A.,
Ili LLr IL11-11
10140 1+0/I'?/?o m, %14?
1 1 15 0 T I I. I T I f It
;As co"801v
1113 11T3k IT It'
?03An n9/1N90 1 0%S C -L m9AN i
115 V T I L I r 11 S
MT I,
10*41 OW01F 90 .0o!4A9r of; NAfQ*At
119 WATEItCPAPT/j1JOi1/AY'J of
C, •S/ t'�/'00 1.6: AC.:
i7
Ot'�p Tlr, nn: �T .•qV/.i!1,
-
.... ae,r1
.a1 :
:e,. -.no
^65:F,-s-lrl.;
:,yH'
.; i I . !'.ny.1 �•,
���JJJ
303:•7
04,1!190
'+Js:ILrE(L1? ANIMAL CO
•05
CONTPACT oAv,:eyT/tgpt• }??„c
i A, tg
011/1..r•A
N.,4 q,a :•l
cr4rEi PbwE
14F
!I ri1•if,,=3
y.?•}.A9
.na.5?
na••?...1n
Ir.?:• -Lo ccH
81:TE;5 OOuE
E..a
,)tllit.l=$ _
1:x!.60
_ --
i0i}3
04/I?/90
NOPr1/i,cw
Sr4rE4 P011E
It.$
UTILITIES
3.58?.59
3035?
04/17/90
NOCTNEON
STATES 00WE
I&.3
UTILITIES
71.99
303}3
00/12/90
tvvmF•RN
SLATES POwE
It.9
UTIL1?IES -
_ &43.63
,
II) I'0
n�r17/90
Nriol.•EFr:
S7AT( S POVE
IAS
UTILITIES
55•$0
111144
n4/1?191t
NTLI)INE ON
ST?fES POwF
,All
DTII. ITIFS
Ig}, IN,
3•)!53
09/17,90
NOP IIIC PN
$1;At•f,5 POME_
I&r! 131 ilii 11 i_. _
1r•R4_
_�.
• 303',3
09/17/90
N•?RTHERN
STATES Pr -WE
169
UrILITIES
?11.76
303}?
09/17/90
NOPTHER”
STATES POwE
1&8
UTILITIES
197.3*)
30153
09/1.'/00
NORTHF,PN
STATF,S OONF
I&9
-16O
UTILITIES _
}^9.07 _
1(053
0'+/17,90
H^OTHcNJ
STAiiS OWE
ViT!IiiES
090.&6
10, Ian,&,
•rHF: ✓ r!1r+1
30354
09, 17/90
NOPNE ST
It.VE5TMENT 8 -..
-15}
A3 o4 NT
?.&07.01
.•
30i\4
A-)/17/00
POI Ylk (IQT
tr4:WC• TPJA
170
PEC_/CIINO•s(1NTOAC•T
I, 106.?1
11,14&
V•7.,' jl1
OCOVFS4.1•irlb(
}COI,•••:C
1'•
M•ITP ,ONTO,4E,4
2•.l?r,5.}3
?0357
09/17/90
01140T'f
%AVN .rAIHr?N
310
0U -G -
510.00
•-
' . arjste
011 '?/"
Sit-ONSQv
:UMSEP Cnw6
193
OEPAj"g WfTEP OE ?T
99.8&
0.1;1"•
4^/1?,?f.
}T....:L 1;N
Ll1..rlEa c.c.
.q>
1yDOnV/5,•n^ ! 1:0 PA.
-F !?."
010 1?• t0
3'wi•l5rot
LU►•EfP^«O
141
OE PeTOglOpb.O H•I;1et!
,1.04
I
.l1 30359
09/17/90
5MI'r1+ ♦
HATES
194
PAYDOLL, OFOVCTIONS
90.08
' a03tn
49''11.'90+OltSl!IIEP/RIGNAPO
717
MILEAGE E4PENSE
i1
. F 3n3a1
0411x/90
/I;IJ1K LANpG Ii1. t. /E.•�
_.Z���r«1.��NQ.F�1,I_';v A.Ll. I'l. 19, iS.
-,FN6PA: GMf {rINO
TOTAL
tAB. 145.73
'
BRC, itm IAL �.SVSTE'M
-
---09/t9L00 - ,10:,57,":)35
�- - - •�
. . -c Oisburs9mAn!' Jguroal-:,:..
- _
WAR-PANT
DATE, ; w1;r1DOR; .. .. ..
QESC4.iPT;I;nw ent!)Lit!?
CLAIM INvt!
`
GENERAL, CHECKING
-
�".1.". .. -. _ _•
•4 ".___.
30362
09/18/90
MQ-1*ICE'LL0 FIPE,VEPA
135..F.IREMEN'S.
WAGES
30.3617
09/18/:9J'
M.)v,r1,r6.L0 F 1O 'i;E0.6 "
135-
PACA W/H%i TocMEN S 'la'lEQ:>1.'.k
'1.,ipl..29
-CHE(--N TOTAL
"
30363
09/18/80
17ALL.TGER/JOANNE
376
EASEMENT/FENCE REP:/ 1.329.82
_ ~
-
30366
09/19/90
A 18 T INFO SYSTEMS
1,5,_FIPE
PHO'7E. CHARGES 3.96
30365
09/19/90
AMERICAN ENGINEERING
379
ENGFEES/SANOBERG E 1.500.00
30366
09/19/90
AMERICAN NATIONAL Si
7+INTEREST/1960
d.O.80 537.50
...
-
30388
09/19/90
AMERICAN NATIONAL SA
7
P4INCIPAL/1960 G.0 25.000.00
75.5D?.S0
'CHEC►:.TOTAL
30367
09/19/90
ANDERSON 6 A$SOCIArF
10
HANOICAP SIGNS FR PFS 371.1.5
30367
09/19/90
ANDERSON 6 ASSOCIATE
,,,, 10_1gIS.OPERg7I@G_SUP/STIP
L64,80
30367
09/19/90
ANDERSON 8 ASSOCIATE
10
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS/PAR, 120.77
595.07
'CHECK "TOTAL
30369
09/19/90
AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
17
BLD INSP RAOTO REPAIR 158.00
30368
09/19/90
BARTON SAND .6 GRAVEL_
305.SIDEWAL):._PROJEC7_._
. 510:00.
30370
09/19/90
BEN FRAn1MLTN
20
FTLM/SIOEWALK PROJECT 10:99
30370
09/19/90
BEN 1'F:ANKLIN
?O
MIS�C.SUPPLIES 19.99
,?0.99
'CHEC$( tOTA'L
30371
09/19/90
8ERGSTP0.0 BROS.-.LNC.. _.- _. 2.1_
MOSESITIT=INGS/ST DEPT L-0..,1 1.
_ T
`cl
1
30372
08/19/9.0
BRAVCH/CLARE
-.90087
SEWER/WATER REFUND 26.61
3037.]
09/19/90
BPAVN Et10INEERIN,
759
TESTING/MEADOWS II 10Q 360.!W
30314
09/,10/90
6L1FtALO BITL!MI ovs.._..-^25.4A,
,TPWe.R,SUPPLIES..-796.,OD.
i
30376
09f19Y1)0
BUgF4(0
29SHOD
,-1:008OACAGE'IMPROVEM
270.00.
'CHEGK'TO'f Al
-.1-
'11
;
30375
09/19/91)-CF7
SALES
375
JACIHAMMER,1A CHISEL/S 189'.97
'30315
O9/10%90
CFM SALES
='`137.5
PEPAIR KITS/WATER DEP 171.02.
30376
09/19/90
COAST TO COAST
35
BATTERIES/REFUSE COLL 96:78
30370
00/t9/90
COAST -TO COAST
35.610 REPAIRS/PARKS'DEPT 3.88
30376
09/10/90
COAST TO COAST
3S
MISC SUPPLIES/L18RAP-/ 77.94
30370-00/10190
COAST TO COAST
35
PEPATR SVPcLTES/CITY MA 3.78
-
30316
09/10/90
COAST TO COAST _
33_MISC.SUPPLIES/SfQ9fT 0 17.72--
30370
00/19/90
COAST TO COAST
14
MISC SUPPLIES/PAPP, DEP 37.69
30376
00/10/90
COAST TO COAST
3S
MISC REPAIRS/STREET OEP 1.80
30370
09/19/90
COAST TO COAST
35
SMALL TOOLS/SHOP 6 GAP 71.27
30376
00/10/90
C0413f TO COAST
35
BLD PEPAIR9/FIDE DEPT 79.11
ORC FINANCIAL, SYSTEM
09/19/90 10:57:35
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL [NECKING
30376 09/19/90 COAST TO COAST
30176 09/10/90 COAST TO COAST
30376 09/19/90 COAST T7 COAST
30376 09/19/90 COAST ro COAST
30376 09/19/90 COAST 10 COAST
30376 09/19/90 COAST TO COAST
30376 09/t9/90 COAST TO COAST
30375 09/19/90 COAST 'r0 COAST
?0376 09/19/90 COAST TO COAST
30375 09/19/90 COAST rO COAST
30376 09/19/90 COAST TO COAST
30376 09/10/90 COAST TO COAST
30376 09/19/90 COAST TO COAST
30377 09/19/90 COMMUNICATION At,JIIO
30378 09/19/90 COPY 0004CATING PROD
30379 09/19/90 OTAr.1?NO VCi;FL PAINT
30380 09/10/00 OOT•//KAREN
30381 09/19/90 DOWNTOWN STANDARD
30387 09/19/90 ONEPR'S WA'rEP CADS S
30303 09/10/90 DYNA SYSTEMS
30383 00/10/00 DYNA SYSTEMS
30384 00/10/90 FF.F•ORITE CONTROLS. 1
30304 09/19/90 FEEOPITE CONTROLS. I
30384 09/10/00 FEEDRIrE CONTROLS. I
30304 09/19/90 FEEORITE CONTROLS. I
30??5 09/19,90 FILE INSTRUCTORS ASS
' 30360 00/19/00 FIRGT rRUST CENTER.
30300 09/19/90 FIRST TRUST CENTER
307!7 n?,+9/90 gAoTn�P's rlec�r:E s•AO
30300 00/19/90 (70PHFR SrATE 011E CAL
30389 09/lq/10 -,OVfPNMltlT TPAINING
-- .- .Dlsbvly)-ent
JoUreel
- --. •. -
OESCPIPTION AM -)41)T
CLAIM INvp7;
35
MT.SC REPAIRS/FTRF DEPT
60.99
- - -
35
FOLIIP RFPAT6 rA'lrb/PAR
36.03
?5
IMPROVEMEN7S/!MOP A OA
71.53
35
MISC SUPPLIES/WATER OE
67.18 --.
- -
35
VEHICLE REPAIRS/FIRE 0
76.87
35
POSTING ERROR
74.81CR
35
SMALL TOOLS/DARK OEOT
15.08
- ---
35
MTC SUPPLIES/WATER OE
153.59
35
VAN BINS/WATEP OEPT
19.70
• 35 -EQUIP REPAIR-DAPTS/S CO 8.76 --
--
35
OLD REPAIRS/PAP✓, DEPT
10.73
35
8LO REPAIR SUP/WATER 0
37.76
35
SMALL TOOLS/STREET DED
35.39
-
E•55.97
eC1+Ery TOT 41,
38
RAO,IQ RE>AI=S/FIRE OE='
41.79
41
COPY MACHINE MTC/LIBRA
'.5.00
765
TRAFFIC 06TNT
106.6('
68
MILEAGE EXPENSE
35.84
370
SIDEWALK. PROJECT CHGJ
47.40
49
RENTAL HOIJSF WATER CAR
14.75
50
SO
PIPE FITTINGS/WATER OE
NUTS A BOLTS/STRECT OE
46.57
51.03
99.00
-CHECK T AL
56
MISC .PROFESSIONAL SFRV
)1.00
50
REGULATOR/WATER OEP 1.140.00
-56
CHEMICALS/WATER OF -P 7.677.66
50
MTSC OPERATING SUPPLTE
17.67
3.637.48
•CHECK TOTAL
304
B^Ov.S/DLO 111!0 DEPT
78.10
56-1963
G.O.ACNO FEES
106.37
5A
1975 G.O. 80110 FEES
57.50
163.67
•CHECX TOrAl,
371
Er.VEIOPES/nccl,_E 5UP
4.9t
60
PROF SERVICES/WATFR 0
160.00
72
PEG FEE/60 1rISP/GARY
70.00
E•RC rINArJC'IAL SYSTEM
09/1 9/90 10:57 :35
WAPF[AIIT DATE VFrJOUP
GENERAL CHFCKING
_ Oi :dor F±m±nt Journal .
pEcr, c•IPTlOH AMOUNT CLAIM INV•)IC
3039009/19/90 HArJ O Y M ArJ'S• INC. .90090 UEW._TANY.EP REPATPS/FI 173.96
30391 09/19/90 111PPY'C Ai1Fl. S9001,y
le VCH]CLE PEF•1IQS/FIPF C• 10,05
303 91 09: IS/1?0 SAPP% Z; AUTO SUPPLY.
7S..MISC SUPPLIES/WA_ SP. OE 1?.13
-
303 01 09/19/90 HARRI'S AUTO SUPPLY
79 SMALL TOOLS/STPEF•T DSP 20.60
?0391 09/19/90 HAPPY 'S AUTO SUPPLY
7E1 EOUTP REPAIRS/Sl PEET$ 59.91
30391 09/19/90 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
79 M3SC SUPPLI4S/SHAOE FRE S.00
30391 09/+9/90 Hr F'RY'S E910 SUPPLY
7E7 ECIUI'' PEPATPS:PARV DE 163.95
30:91 09/19/90 14A^4/'S At, r•] SUPPLY
79 VF111171,F RFPATRS/Sro.0 113.113
305.99_.
-GHECK_2O1 AL
30392 09/19/90 HFpMES/JERRY
01 LIBRARY JANITORIAL SE ??l -50
W:a 93 09/19/90 HOLIDAY rPEO11 OFFIC
95 GAS/FIRE DEPT 25.90
30396 (39/19/90 HOLMES & GRAVEN
96PROp_SFRVICES/REMWLF, 029 :00
30396 09/10/90 HOLMES &. GRAVEN
09 PROF SERVICES/TAPPER 309.75
30396 09/10/90 HOLMES 9 GRAVEN
86 MISC PROF SERVICES/NRA 30.00
1.256.25
'CHECK TOTAL
30395 00/10/90 JME SERVICE CO.
306 FRAM 250/DUMPSTFR CHG 100.00
30399 09/19/90 KOROPCHAK/OLIVE
97 MILEAGE E7PENSE 37.15
30391 09/10/00 LUND FOUIPMFNT COMPA .00001
OFFICE SUPPLEIS/C'IT'r H 13.03
10399 09/19/90 MaCOVEEN EOUIPMENT I
IQ 60 GAL GAF'E1AGE CCH119: 55.10
30399 00/19/90 MA&.rlE'S FARM SERVIC
101 RESESOIrjC.rdArE rOWFP 05.50
10&00 09/19/90 MA.JS FOODS
10t MISC•SUPPLIES/WATER OE 21.39
30&00 09/19/96 HAUS MOOS
IGS MIT -C SUPPLIES/Sl"O" S G 2!7.10
30&00 09/19/9(1 M&•:a 901 0$
10P' CLEANING SUWJIV HALL 10.77
30400 00/19/00 MAUS FOCDS
100.15L3C OPE_RArING SUP/C.11,35.02-
30&00 09/19/90 MADS F0006
1011 CLEANING SVP/ANIMAL CO 30.01
30&00 00/10/00 MA -!S FOCDS
100 CLEANING SUP/LISRARV 36.13
109.09
'CHECK TOTAL
304.01 09/19/90 Mk7flCMALI, COMPAN/
11 1 COMPPESSOP REP/:ITV H 100.00
10401 09/19/90 M.=DC'Wl'LL COMPANY
I1 LNEW COMPRESSOR/1.200AR 1/5.00
_
015.00
'CHECK TO(AL
90402 09/1910D MICRO SOFINARE NEWS 173 SUBSCRIPTION/COMPUTER 190.00
)0601 00/10/90 MIDWAY INDI)STRIAI. SU 11h E011TP Rs_PA(PS/STREETS 1.61
90406 r)S119/90 MIDWEST VISION OISTR 779 SAFETY GLASSES/STREET 70.10
SRC FINAr+CTAL 'SYSTEM
OVA 9/90 1p: 57:'35
VAPPANI PATE VENOJP
GENERAL CHECKING
30405 09/19/90 MN DEPART OF NATLIP•AL
30406 09/19/90 MN PUBLIC TPANSIT AS
30407 09/19/90 MONTICELLO CHAMBER 0
30406 09/19/90 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
30409 09/19/90 MONTICELLO OFFICE PP.
30409 09/19/90 MOr1TICELLO ROTARY
30410 09/19/90 MCNTICELLO TIMES
30410 09/19/90 MriNTTCELLQ TIMES
30410 09/10/90 MONrICELI.I) TIMES
30410 09/19/90 MJ:+TICELIO TIMES
30410 09/10/90 MONTICELLO TIMES
30410 09/19/90 MONTICELLO TIMES
301.10 09/19/90 Mr1:tTICFI.1.01 TIMES
30411 00/19/90 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN
30411 09/19/9.) M•)O�I MOTOR SA••fS. IN
30411 00/19/90 !,.00N MOTOR SALES. IN
304.1 09/19/90 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN
)Oh 11 00/10/90 N,rCN MOTOR SALES. IN
30412 09/19/00 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
30413 09/19/90 NORTHERN GASES INC.
30h14 00/19/00 NUTECH ENVIRONMENTAL
` A
"{ 30415 09/19/90 OLSON Q SONS ELECIP,I
30414 09/19/90 OLSON A SONS ELECTRI
30415 09/19/90 OL$ON 6 SONS ELECTRI
30415 00/19/00 OLS04 41 SONS EI.ECTRT
"%Q4 t j 09/19/90 MS -)-i F6 gO11S ELECTPT
3Oh15 09/10/90 OLSON 0, SONS ELECTRI
30415 09./19/00 OL SON 6 SONS ELECTRI
30410" 04/'£/70 •)a4rlM !M1 F•.)1 M(o., Ific.
..n 30,,113 An/19/00 C.A•Jv Rflh)TH!�S. INC.
30417 09,11)/90 ORP.-SCI9ELE N•MAY( PON
)1417 09/19/9n no;-grM[l!N•MAYERnN
304t7 09/10/90•Rn-eCMELF;r+•MAYEopN
plsnl!r.nn,•.+nb JOUr'n:1
OfSCPiPItt}a AMOUNT
_Ct-ASM Tr:VOT,C
119-WATERCPAFT/ATV/eNOV P 1391. 00
--.
303 SIJBSCPIPT I(`rl/ rRANSI r 50.00
133 MISC EYPENSE/ECON DEV 120.00
138 rAPES/COUNCTL MF,F,TTNGS 35.95
--
130 OFFICE SUPPLIES/C MAL 021.71
657.66
•CHECK r0'rAL
130 MEMBERSHIP OYES/J ONE 251.07 •"_-
.. _ .-
140 BLD PERMIT INFO 60.00
140 .EGA'. PUdI_1CATIONS $9.93
140 P!1Tii.1C. HEAPING NOrI':.F 1 '..?E•
•40 HPA lA/ Ir+CREMENT PUB 88.40
140 BIOS/SEAL COATII+G/SIDE 126.90
140 COMPOST TN:o i!•.00
140.9109/.)ARSAr.F CONTPA.'-T 6R.00
0:'5.45
••.MEIV TOTAL,
14? EOUIP RFPAIPS/STREETS 5.09
1&2 EQUIP REPAIPS/SMAOE TP 18.47
142 OIL/SHADE rREE 1.14
142 Mr Sr SUP/SMADE TPfF •21.60
142 VF.NICI.F REPAIRS/PAc•IS 76,77
79.47
•CHECK TOTAL.
144 VEHICLE REPAIRS/STR(ET 71.10
147 FIRE DEPT SUPPLIES 0:50
157 CHF.MICALS/WWTP 2.401.00
+00 BLO REPAIRS/WATER DEP 294.09
160 OLD REPAIRS/CITY HA1.1. 48:00
i00 M75C REPATPS/ST-LTGMT 159.71
160 IMPROVEMENrg/SHOP e G 189.40
100 PEPAIRS/L WARY 5L .99
160-EOUIP" RE9'A1R3/WArfiR 0 ?S1.AS
100 EOUIP REPAIRS/SEW COL 111.00
1.007.18
&CHECK TOW.
3)4 IMPR01•'(MErltgr<Hr,o y nA 21,)1
134 a19S SUPPI,tP.9/SroFEIS tr.31
51. It
152 CONTRACTS PAYABLE/M 3.758.)5
152 TPANSF(P FI)N05/NPA I.016.00 -:R
102 PFRNIT/SANOr3re1: (AST 110.00
'DRC F-I144NCIAL=STSTEM
;
09/19/90 10:.57:35'
019b'ar1.m•7nb :IOtrrnPl,
"
WARRANT DATE VFnCtOFt.
C•ESr F_[PT7Q•r;l 4I M, ,I ffVCtlr'
='AM��!INT
GENERAL CIJF4:KING
304 17- 09/191 90 QRa-SC!+ELE�i•(•!avERG'N
187 ENGINEERING FF'ES 1'.004.--19 -
30411 09/10 Y90 ORP -S C'4 F!FN-M.AVE PO,
416i EnG -FEES/TARcf?a
70417 09/19/90OP.c-SrMFLEN-�AVERt?-J
1,02 ENG FEWPEM.e!E PRO) 390_.56
°304'17 09/19/ 00 O~k-SCliELE7+-MAYER1Cti
162:.E:JG .f EES/Kf9AR-f PR 30..1,31..74
30417 09/19/ 90 OPP-SCME1.EN-MAVERON
Ir,2 ENG FEES/WATER PESE 1.229.46
30417 09/19,190OR9.-SCHELEN-MAVSP•-,N
162 E146 FEES,/SA'+DE:E?G EAS 944.15 -
35.,825.75. -.,,•CHECK TOTAL ,
30418 09/10/90 PA':AE IfJC00 0Pnr O
360 TESTING'/NAT?P- PESEPVC'I 31.0:•
'
30419 09/19/90 PALMED PRINTING
-348 'CITY BROCHURE IMPO INT 113.00 _ N
304?0 09/19/90 PI.IJMBFPV-PVRCEL.I.'S P
251 BLO REPAIRS/PARKS $8.38 -
30620 09/19/90 PL1!MOEPV-PVPrFLL'13 P
751 -TSC SUPPLIES/HATER. OE 45.07
103.45 1cHFrH TOTAL
30421 09/19/90 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
173 FIRE HALL CL lPi SEP. 50.00
30421 09/19/90 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
173 CITY MALL CLEANING; SE400.00
-• •, 450.00 -CHECK TOTAL
30422 09/10/90 R.S.MEANS CO.
372 SU85CPIPTION/BLD Tt+SP 76.95•
30423 09/19/90 ROYAL TIDE OF MONTIC-
-�
22) VEHICLE RlDAIR9IFIRE 714.24
30424 09/19/90 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP.
186, -ATC. AGREEMENT/SHOP b 0 84.000
30425 09/19-190 SC'NARBER b SO`+S. IOC
229 BOLT/PARK DEPT +-.59
-186 /PARKS. 62.00
30428 09/19y90 SCHERER SANITATION
LATRINE RENTAL-
ro
1
3042,7 09/19 /90 SCMLUENOEP CONSTRUCT
i
_ 187 .0I40IN0/K: NAPT.PROJEC 5.1S.00-
p�'
!
30629 00/19 /OD SEFJT,PV SYST_4MS
lee:MTG- 4GPEF•MEr1T'/WAtE4 OE 9.0.00:
30429 O9/19./90 SMELTON I;OMP4FJV
-269 MTC AOREMNT/t.lCi.w 180".00 -• - -�-
30430 00/10 /00 SNUMAIJ/CATHY
101 MILEAGE E)PENSF. 10.76, -_
'
"30431 09/;19'/10 SIEFERTlOIANE
..90070-MILE,4GE EYPE!ISE 2'-. 5•
30r,37 09/tp/00 SIMP1.Fif TIME RECOROE
376 MTC AGREE/C HALL CLOG 130.:25
30433 09/19 /,90 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
289,.TOMEL/CITY MALL LO.40
301,31. 09/19 /90 TEAM. CHOICE
226 BASEBALL BASE VDAP.KS 170.00
30435 09/19/90 TEAM LABORATORY CHEM
311 CLFAtJ1N0 9UP/ SI1+ER CO 105.55
¢f
-
�•s
BFC FIHAHCTAL SYSTEM
"
09/19/90 10:57:35
-----,...'
U; •nu�e.m�nt-Jovrn+I -,-- —,•.•
WARgANT DATE
VEr:00R
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLATM
INVOICT
GENERAL CHECKING
.l
,'_l
30436
09/10/90
UhITOG RENTAL SERVTC-
._.7u._UNIFORM-PENTAL-
30436
09/10/00
UNITOG RENTAL SEP.VIC
711
UNIFOF.'M QCNTAL 61.78
1
30436
09/19/90
UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
211
UNIFORM RENTAL 61.77
•n l',�
-30436_09/_19/,90.
UNLT.OG-AENTAL_SERVIC Z1t UN-UOP.M-AEN.LII—.1.3.-12---
---
30436
09/19/90
UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
211
UNIFORM RENTAL 79.80
30436
00/19/90
UNITOG RENTAL- SERVTC
211
UNIFORM RENTAL 28.90 '
_..
... .. _. _. •.773.67" •CHECK -TOTAL
30437
09/19/90
UNOCAL
213
GAS/SEWER COLL 16.50
—3043.7.-09/.18/90
ANOCAL
_ A3_GAUWAZlA-06n.L_- -.Lf -`
• -
�,1i
30437
09/19/00
UNOCAL
213
GAS/FIRE DEPT 83.92
116.99 •CHECY.
TOTAL
30439
09/10/90
WALDOR PUMP A EOUIPM
369
EQUIP REPAIRS/SEWER C 971.86
.304.39-09/.L9/90
WATER_PROOUCS-S_COMR� 7a�Mi5C_SUCRLS65LWAZfiR�.-1.01.04— ^___
. .
30439
09/19/90
WATER PRODUCTS COMPA
216
METERS FOR RESALE 179.41
783.35 ACMECK
TOTAL
30440
00/19/90
WRIGMT COUNTY AUDITO
2111
SHERIFF'S C-_rJTRACT 12.506.71
30440
09/19/90
WPIGHT C9UNTY AUOITO
719
COPIES/TIF CEP,T/REMMFL 50.00
----1.2.'S86•.-�1— - C-HEOK
TOTAL
-.I
30441
09/19/90
V.M.C.A. OF MIHHfAPO
224
CONTRACT PAYMENT 675.00
30447
09/10/90
VONAK LANDctLL. INC.
223
-SEPT
A00'L LA11pFILL C14G4 311.10
GENERAL
1! 1
Or
a1
.I nA'/ � 1/g0 ' po; 15 :_'a 0{.���y n^HAt
,t,;.Ur•n.a
IP.T I4t!!Y' _
r :AM9UNlr .- Cl'A IM I!nrQICE••
• l i?NpR F Utin _ -
- -
6f.'OQ1?
15,00 08/15/90�CGMMTiStONER'O�RFUF-800006 ,At Fa TAt QUE-AiZ-'U"+0'60-31:
:I
"'- ----
15?0'+ 09/15/09 EAGLE WINE C0+!PANY 60001? WINE PUPCHASF
198.03
15202, 03/15/90 GRIGGS'. CC^REP b COM 900018 LTnq.)o PmRCrPSE
2.,030..42
.� 1S>282 08),15/90 GRIG,GS`. C07PER .0 COM 900018 WJNF CREOIT'hUE
1.45Ck
•'2`1128�97—�1icLK-'ffitAt--
n
15203 09/15/90 PHILLIPS L SI)NS CO/E 900037 WINE PURCHASE
429.13
`$0.77
15?33 00/15/90 PtrtLLTPS 8 SONS colt: 80003.7 MTSC MT T'PURCHAS q-
'
15233 09/15/90 PHILLIPS SONS CO/E 60007 LIQU00 PUICHASE
464.1(.
�
n�. r. •, •HECK TOfA+,
•� 152eh 09/15/90 COAST TO COAST 000004 MISC SUPPLIES
16.17 -
+5'269 03/15/90 ST. "LO!10 ;IRE F. 0U1P 90.007-7 9FR'J10E'9199 W'1 0911.4 S,h{1
ri?/31/30 PR INC7 PAL- MhTUAL LIF 600038 INSURANCE PP,EMIU9.
_7:10,.7,5
,( "Y4286" O873T790•"PS'IN'CIPAi MpTUSL LTt'6000]8-'iASUI��RR1tFI�r �'-' 108.86---� "
827..39 -CHECK TOTAL
15-91 eAi31J90 CI7V C'-'MC•NPICE'LtO-541 Tgep4S —•
-e S: dao..C�9"• .' _- __,
�i
15 y9" 03/3'r/A9 GPIG95. SOO�EP 8 CO- 6000!13 fOVOP PgiCwASf
'+Y t52C+9 09/31/90 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 600012 MINE PURCHASE
4.930..83
297.84
+5?98 0'' ?t,/,-90 EA9Lf �•'lpE COMPANI' 000012 LIOuOP PURCHASE
so, .,37
.- .,--,.
.. ,*-�-j'i .01, �:r'�IIC,I•,I[ '.TOYA1..
90 03/);{190GP ICGS. COOPER L'COM 800018 LIOUOR PUPCHA9f'
18291 08/] 1/p0 EROS WHOLESA 800022 LIQUOR PURCHASE
-JOHNSON
i,b29,1 JO-1NSO1! QEOS WHOLESA, 800022 SINE ,PURCHASE
2.944.80
,09i?,IJ!90
- a-, _
"%i,;®a9.Ei' •6Hf�r:.?Jing
URCHASE"
,i 10?_9;2 G�f1,31'too ;PHILLIPS M SONS,CO/E"8000M LIQUOR PURCHASE-
-8727:9-'-
1 19292 rpOL3 C%90'P11,Th6;t,oS'!"40Il5"C07E""8000l1�410E-PQgL1fd5E�'
15
c
1,
4.82,9.00 •"NECK. TOTAL
15rP] !)8!9 0 1A l.TrJ' DINE 8, 'SDIRI':8000110-C'10!10P PURCHASE-
'?:4A8.00'--
+"a?B3,Os (?1%90 CAVAL}YY VINE'0. SPIRT 400040 WINE PURGpASe
919':13
:•CHE!:K TOTAL
10204 06/31%90 AME"RICA'+.euslNe89 i 800073 NEW EMPLOYEE Sw=RTS
998.40
'TOTAL -
t70. V,S:gT
ESP-; FJN4n1.1AL SYSTEM
nn%12/90 18:06:?a
WaVRANT DATE VV:DOP
�L iOVOR FUJ,D
�D.isburse:Aent. Jovrr13L. _,,.�_......:..
t SSCPIPTTn,•, A•+nUnT CLAIM. IHVI )K-
1[309 09/12/30 Y.P1''jM RADIO STATI(•N 600000 ADVERTISING 08.00
r
15310 09/12/40 90L1.F9 SANITATION 800023 GARBAGE SERVICE 201.160
q'
!C4SCv T07A,L
1CHECY TOTAL
OCIIECY, TOTAL
j
r..
f 1GLE++T!!E-:.S.hTE9r1_...9LtY0�.2�WIN; ...P P-CHAAL
J-2Y-.RB-
�r��
+4305
09/12/90
EAGLE WINE COMPANY 000012
MI% PORCHASe
15.35
1e,n6
nn!tn/90
1.;•:{•/,r.rr qRC.: aNO'.ESa
91)0021'
IrINF PLIr•'CNASE
1.761.18
tS30F
0?/+?190
1 ,+
�•'
1.52S7~
69 i1?/90
4STECH �—
900074
SEaLC04TU+G PARY.tnG
L 064.60
n p
e. • z
n
rr�
15298
09/+2/90
riF,PF,iCYrS PEPSI -.OLA
600001
P_OP• PQZ HASE _._
343..00..----
(5307
•.,j
a0'i5+.l IN 9EVEPASF..I.900019,SEEQ
09/ 9U
OCIG,EH4Y-%P, TEIEPHC44
8009?2
TELF•PHONE CHARGES
79.60
+UE �}�HOY t�iq's,n[c0 809Q?1
�l a�
15300
OD/12/90
CIrV OP MONTICELLO
80000?
SEVER AND WATER BILL 66.53
/
193.02
15301
09/1?/90
COMMISSIONEP rF P.EVE
9000013
SALES TAY DUE FOP
11).677.53
„1
15307
O^./12/90
DAHLIIEIMER OISTP-IOUr
900009
BEEP PURCHASE
:7.553.67
15302
OAHLHEIMER_LNISTPIBUT
000009
ORANGE JUICE
_ 79.75
•_•
r•
y153(I?
_09/+J/90
00/12/90
DAHL HFIMER OISTR I67T
600009
MIA
21.00
17.654.62
•'HECX TOTAL
�-489.29
15303
O0/0/90
DA? OiSrRI:3VrIN, COM
609010
BF.cP PUR44115F --
'
15303
09/17/90
DAY OISTPIBVTING COM
800010
MISC PUPCHASE'S
23.10
- - ---'—_'..------
- -
---51-1
14
•rUDCY t0TA1r_...
44 1
.
15304
09/12/90
OIC' BFVERAGE COMPAN
80001+
MISC SUPPLIES
41.00
j
15301,
09/12/00
nrrl/ BEVERA'3: COMOAN
900011.BE.EP
PI�PCH45F..
1..@18.'70
',.
1.9:13.?n
`;H,FCv Tn'01
1[309 09/12/30 Y.P1''jM RADIO STATI(•N 600000 ADVERTISING 08.00
r
15310 09/12/40 90L1.F9 SANITATION 800023 GARBAGE SERVICE 201.160
q'
!C4SCv T07A,L
1CHECY TOTAL
OCIIECY, TOTAL
j
?/.9Q
f 1GLE++T!!E-:.S.hTE9r1_...9LtY0�.2�WIN; ...P P-CHAAL
J-2Y-.RB-
�r��
+4305
09/12/90
EAGLE WINE COMPANY 000012
MI% PORCHASe
15.35
+4109
09/+1?/41)
eA�l,e WINE COMPANY 600012
Beef OV"Naq
42.02
tS30F
0?/+?190
;1CZ(•''`• C40DEP t5 1, Cm S000IS
LIOVOR PURCHASE
Ot'2i6.61
�Iu
5301)
911
e. ,_lteo_
r rte\ C PR A r_nM AnAA
i.I_• ,'.,- air ��stx
n p
e. • z
n
rr�
16385
00/12/90
-
ORIGGS. COOPER A COM 800016
lIOUOR RURCMASe
1.91S.10
18.212.00
(5307
p4 ;,7%9o1
a0'i5+.l IN 9EVEPASF..I.900019,SEEQ
PURCHASE" -�'i^'.6?)-.tr•
n
18308
0+1/12/90,
+UE �}�HOY t�iq's,n[c0 809Q?1
C
rrrj, IGARS. 1ETC.
Li6.,,0J!
19380
00%12%90
,J!
JI�1tR,- f,ANOV f TOBACCO 600021
BAGS
193.02
15300
09/'12/90
-JF*f CANOY A TOBACCO 000021
MTSC SUPPLIES
64.00
• 1+
r
1[309 09/12/30 Y.P1''jM RADIO STATI(•N 600000 ADVERTISING 08.00
r
15310 09/12/40 90L1.F9 SANITATION 800023 GARBAGE SERVICE 201.160
q'
!C4SCv T07A,L
1CHECY TOTAL
OCIIECY, TOTAL
j
�•1
E:C•, fltlt
•:CIAO $'i STE«
•._
._�..— ...
-
+
OS+/12/90 16:0824
9,.
tr�r>rrn'
Oe,t:
vfrtOOc
OffGP'TPTI�N
ar+,:"riT CLAI.M
inv.)f<<.
LIOVOR FUND
•
15311
09/12/90
LIfffRT TRUCKING
800025
CREIGHT.CHARGES _
__029..70_...
15312
09/12/90
MAVS FOODS
800027
MISC PVOCHASES
+7.99
'I.
15313
09/12/90
MCOOWALL rOMDANV
600005
COMPRESSOR REPAIRS
63.20
1 I
15314
09/12/90
MIOWESr GAS LOM•`.aNV
800019
UT1I.ITI°_S _. _
3.35_.
�r,l
tS?ty
7?/+?190
MpMTICELLO SHOPPLI16
6O^015
AOVERTISING
85.00
-
15?16
09/12/90
wnNTICELLO TIMES
800032
ADVERTISING
59.00
_
•
••1?17
01?117/$6
.1nPTHfPN STATi; OQyE
6AOA,y
LITILIJIES
9'29 .2?
,S}1S
00/17/9O
(OHARA RQ-'-5.
OLI\,ES.CHER:%IFS. M1J5HP
SO.On
15316
O9/.S?/SO
^'HP.rA Bcgi� :sic 9N1_OII^0511
toS��EEE. H'''1 ^
..5721+. DO___--.--- .
--••-
�nF
I^
-
1.00 •CHECY
TOTP1•
�=t
153.1
01/12/40
PAPTV Pt LS _.
6OOOIOlOOLZAS
�•
1a3+O
nn/12/90
')'!1L I": WINE ) SPIA1
600040
WINE oUF•: ':A4;
1.9y.ag
'
15320
.Csi 1_01_20
.01.1 Al Ly V..
—•---
11
1.160.81 *CHECK
TOTAL
o�
'
15321
04/12/90
RON•S ICE COMPAN v
600061
.ICE-PURCHASE
._1.05).19
I
15? 17
09/14/90
SFVFN•UP 60111.I1JO CO
800043
POP PURCHASE
176.55
•—.
-
15323
09/12/00
ST. CLOUD RISTaURkit
800065
GLASSES. COOLERS.
6 M 130.15—�—•_
••.1r1
14324
00/12/90
THOPPE OISTRI6UT IND
600048
BEER PURCHASE.
L3,743.65 .
..I
15)2'•
09/12/90
V7hIHG COCA-COLA BOT
800051
POP PURCHASE
4+9.10
1
:cl
T-
F
L IOUOR FUND
1
TOTAL
68.401.32
l:
u
l
CONSIDERATION OF OPERATING SUNDAY BUS SERVICE
ON A PILOT PROGRAM BASIS
Pilot program initiated in response to petition requesting bus
service from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
PILOT PROGRAM DESCRIPTION:
Dial -a -ride service every Sunday morning from 8:00 a.m. until
12:00 p.m.
Service offered through December on a trial basis only.
• If program is successful, decision on future funding and/or
hour re -allocation to be made In December.
ESTIMATED COST OF PILOT PROGRAM:
Hours per day 4
Days of service 8
Total hours 32
Cost per hour $ 12.00
Total hourly charge $384.00
Average miles per hour 13
Total miles 416
Charge per mile $ 0.13
2. Total mileage charge $ 54.08
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $438.08
PROJECTED REVENUE:
Rides per day (one way) 30
Total rides 240
Revenue per ride $ 0.50
Total revenue $120.00
NET COST $318.08
OTHER BUDGET DATA:
System budget supplemented by return of 1990 state gas tax
payments. State of Minnesota owes the City $1,000. This revenue
could be used to finance the $318 expense.
ck