City Council Agenda Packet 06-24-1991AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, JUNE 24, 1991 - 7:00 P.M.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst,
Dan Blonigen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held June 10, 1991.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Public Hearing --Delinquent sewer and water accounts.
5. Consideration of approval of development agreement governing
City/developer installed improvements --Briar Oakes Estate
Phase I.
6. Consideration of approval of final plat phase I, Briar Oakes
Estate. Applicant, Prestige Builders.
7. Consideration of a rezoning request to rezone Outlet I, Meadow
Oak Subdivision, from an R -PUD (residential planned unit
development) to R-1 (single family residential) zone.
Applicant, Prestige Builders of St. Cloud.
8. Public Hearing --Consideration of resolution approving plans
and authorizing advertisement for bids --Briar Oakes Estate,
Project 91-2.
9. Public Hearing --Consideration of a resolution approving plane
and authorizing advertisement for bide --Fallon Avenue and
Cardinal Hills improvement projects 91-1 and 91-3.
10. Consideration of accepting the 1991 Audit Report for the City
of Monticello.
11. Consideration of the offer to exchange land in lieu of
delinquent assessments--Outlot A of Country Club Manor.
12. Consideration of Chamber request for office Bpaco.
13. Consideration of options for parking lot expansion at City
Hall.
14. Consideration of resolution supporting county adoption of
local sales tax option.
Council Agenda
June 24, 1991
Page 2
15. Consideration of speed study for Chelsea Road and approval of
the county posting the paved shoulders on County Road 117 near
Highway 25 with "no parking."
16. Consideration of final payment for Project 90-04, utility
Improvements and appurtenant work for Sandberg East,
17. Consideration of purchasing tractor/mower/snowblower for the
parks department.
18. Consideration of a proposal for exterior restoration of the
new Monticello Fire Station,
19. Consideration of bills for the month of June.
20. Adjournment.
l
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 10, 1991 - 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen, Clint Herbst,
Brad Fyle, Ken Maus
Members Al+gant: None
Approval of minutes.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Brad Fyle to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting held May 28, 1991. Motion carried unanimously.
Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
Jim Jones and Steve Lindberg, residents of 331 East Third
Street, submitted a petition signed by 25 residents of the
neighborhood noting concerns over the neglect and
deterioration of property located at 331 East Third Street in
Monticello. The petition requested that the City use whatever
authority It has to handle the matter in the appropriate way.
Administrator Wolfstellor noted that the City is considering
adopting an ordinanco which would provide for the licensing or
rental properties. Under this ordinance, the City would have
Lho authority to withhold a license Lo operate an apartment
building if basic health and safety and other building code
violations are not corrected. It was Lho consensus of Councl I
to direct staff to research the problem further and determine
to what extent the City has authority to act to resolve the
problems noted by the residents.
Public hoarinq and consideration of approvinq a resolution for
modification of Redevelopment Project Plan for Tax Increment
Finance District Plans No. 1-1 throuqh 1-11 and for
establishment of Tax Increment Finance District 1-12 and
adoption of tho Tax Increment Plan relaLinq thoreto.
The public hearing was oponod by Mayor Maus, at which time
011ie Koropchak reviewed the tax increment financing plan
associated with Lho development of the Aroplax Corporation
development site. Koropchak noted that Aroplax Is a plastic
injection molding, tooling, and engineering company that has
boon in business for 40 years. The Aroplax development calls
for construction of a 22,400 aq ft concrote facility in
Oakwood Industrial Park. Approximately 20 jobs will be
croatod, which will consiot of both high and medium skilled
Page 1
NO
Council Minutes - 6/10/91
workers. Salaries for the workers will range from $16 to $17
per hour. There being no comments, the public hearing was
closed.
A motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Brad
Fyle to adopt a resolution modifying the TIF plans for TIF
District Nos. 1-1 through 1-12 and establishing TIF District
1-12 and adopt the TIF plan relating to the Aroplax
development. Motion carried unanimously.
SEE RESOLUTION 91-15.
5. Consideration of a preliminary plat request of Outlot I,
Meadow Oak subdivision, to be entitled Briar Oakes Estate.
Applicant, Prestiqe Builders of St. Cloud.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill noted that on June 6, 1991,
the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, reviewed
the preliminary plat, and recommended Council approval of the
plat subject to a number of conditions. O'Neill went on to
note that the plat is consistent with the City ordinance in
terms of lot configuration, park and trail development, and
street system development. O'Neill. recommended that Council
approve the prellminnr.y plat but withhold final plat approval
pending completion of certain tasks.
City Engineer, Bret Weiss, reviewed the feasibility study for
Installation of sewer, water., streets, and storm sewer
systems. As part of his review, he outlined problems
associated with the inability of the City to outlet water to
ditch 33.
Ken Maus reviewed action taken by the City in the early 1980'8
to block the outlet of water from the Meadow Oak development
to ditch 33. Maus reported that the Meadow Oak development
storm drainage system was designed to outlet the same amount
of water as was outlet from the area prior to development. lie
went on to note that we need to work with the county on
possible Improvement of ditch 33 or possibly create our own
outlet to the river and develop an assessment plan to pay for
It.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Pyle and seconded
by Shirley Anderson to approve the preliminary plat of Briar
Oakes Estate and table final plat approval until such time
that the following actions are taken:
City Engineer approval of the drainage plan.
Page 2
D
u
Council Minutes - 6/10/91
2. Army Corps of Engineers' approval of grading and
drainage plan.
3. Eliminate the block overlap that shows the same
block in two separate phases of construction.
4. Preparation of a separate document identifying
walkway easement areas.
5. Restrictive covenants must be signed and recorded
with the final plat.
6. Signing of the final plat is subject to execution
of development agreement.
6. Consideration of rezoning request to rezone Outlet It Meadow
Oak subdivision, from R -PUD to R-1 zone. Applicant, Prestige
Builders of St. Cloud.
Assistant Administrator, Jeff O'Neill, recommended that this
item be tabled until the final plat of Briar Oakes Estate is
ready for consideration by Council. '
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Clint Herbst to table consideration of the
rezoning request to rezone Outlet I, Meadow Oak subdivision,
from R -PUD to R-1 zone. Motion carried unanimously.
7. Consideration of resolution accepting petition ordering
feasibility report, accepting feasibility report, calling for
a public hoaring, and ordering plans and specifications for
Prolect 91-2 (Briar Oakes Estate).
Assistant Administrator O'Neill asked Council to consider
passing a resolution which would initiate the process of
Installing public improvements associated with Briar Oakes
Estate development.
Kevin Schmitz of Prestige Builders was present to review the
feasibility study with the City Engineer and Council.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Dan Blonigen to approve the resolution accepting
the petition, ordering the feasibility report, accepting the
feasibility report, calling for a public hearing, and ordering
plans and specifications contingent on delivery of a $20,000
plan preparation deposit by Prestige Builders to the City of
Monticello. Motion carried unanimously.
SEE RESOLUTION 91-16.
Page 3
Council Minutes - 6/10/91
Consideration of approval of development aqreement qoverninq
city/developer installed improvements --Briar Oakes Estate
Phase I.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the proposed
development agreement governing city/developer installed
improvements for the Briar Oakes Estate phase i development.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to table
this matter until such time that the final plat is prepared
and ready for approval. Various aspects of the development
agreement were discussed. O'Neill reviewed the arrangement
for providing the City with the financial security
guaranteeing that the assessments will be paid. O'Neill noted
that the development agreement requires that the developer
post an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of 408 of
the project cost. In addition, the developer will agree to
pay 1.5 times the cost per lot to pay off the assessment for
each lot that is sold. O'Neill noted that under this formula,
the unsecured portion of the assessment debt will be paid
after 11 of the 28 lots are sold.
It was t.ho consensus of Council that the arrangement
guaranteeing payment of assessments as outlined in the
agreement is adequate.
Consideration of declarinq the City of Monticello as the
responsible qoverninq unit acceptinq environmental assessment
worksheet and orderinq publication of the EAW associated with
the proposed Cardinal Hills residential subdivision.
Having reviewed the EAW submitted by OSM and after discussion,
a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Brad
Fylo to declare the City of Monticello as the responsible
governing unit, accept the EAW, and order the EAW publication
associated with the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision.
Motion carried unanimously.
10. Consideration of resolution acceptinq feasibility report,
calling for a public hoarinq on improvements, and orderinq
plans and specifications for Project 91-3, Fallon Avenue and
Cardinal Hills.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill requested that the City
Council consider adopting a resolution which would initiate
the sewer and water utilities installation process for
utilities to be Installed along Fallon Avenue. The resolution
would also Include Initiation of Installation of utilities
associated with phase I of the Cardinal Hills residential
Pages 4
0
Council Minutes - 6/10/91
subdivision. O'Neill noted that the developers of the
Cardinal Hills subdivision are willing to deposit the funds
necessary to prepare plans and specifications. O'Neill went
on to note that developing plans and specifications associated
with phase I of Cardinal Hills does have some degree of risk
for the developers, as the preliminary plat and final plat are
not approved at this time, and the development agreement is
not in place. Despite the risk of development of plans that
might not be entirely used, the developers are willing to go
ahead with plan preparation and provide the City with the
financial security in the form of a letter of credit. The
letter of credit can be drawn down by the City to pay for plan
preparation in the event the project does not proceed.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Brad Fyle to approve a resolution accepting the
feasibility report, calling for a public hearing, and ordering
plans and specifications for Project 91-3, Fallon Avenue and
Cardinal Hills, subject to submittal of a letter of credit to
the City by Value Plus developers in the amount of $20,000.
Motion carried unanimously.
SEE RESOLUTION 91-17.
Consideration of adopting a resolution reguestinq the City of
Monticello to hold lots 1, 2, 3, 4t 5, and 6„ Block 1, Oakwood
Industrial Park Second Addition, for the H -window Company.
Economic Development Director, 011ie Koropchak, noted that the
H -Window Company soon the next I to 1-1/2 years oo their
growth period, which will be the major determinant in a
decision on whether or not to expand in Monticello. If they
do expand in Monticello, the company's potential size would
double, and the facility would require purchasing an
additional $500,000 to $1,000,000 worth of equipment. Total
employment would amount to 50-60 people. Koropchak noted that
In order to expand, the H-wlndow Company needs to have
available to it Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Block 1, Oakwood
Industrial Park Second Addition. Presently this land is owned
by the City. The Ii -Window Company requests that the City keep
this land available for potential use by the
H -Window Company.
Ken Maus noted that the lots that the City would be holding
have boon for sale for some time and have not generated any
real interest by potential Industrial prospects; therefore,
the City has little to lose by keeping the entire area
available for the H -Window Company.
Page 5
ICE
Council Minutes - 6/10/91
Dan Blonigen agreed that it makes sense to keep the lots
available for the H -Window Company in the event they need to
expand. There is little potential for loss and a good chance
that all lots could be purchased by the H -window Company at
such time that they elect to expand.
A motion was made Ly Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan
Blonigen to adopt a resolution holding Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and
6, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park Second Addition, for the
H -Window Company for a period through December 1992. Motion
carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 91-16.
12. Consideration of an offer to exchange land In lieu of the
delinquent assessments --Out lot A of Country Club Manor.
Administrator Wolfsteller reviewed previous Council action on
this matter and outlined a new proposal which called for
exchanging land in lieu of delinquent assessments.
Wolfsteller noted that the partnership owns 2-1/2 acres along
County Road 75 between the Gille Auto Sales lot and the
Pinewood Playground area. They are proposing to trade the
2-1/2 acres they own to the City In exchange for approximately
10 acres of Outlot A property, with the City retaining
approximately 6 acres of Outlot A for future storm ponding
needs. In return, they are requesting that all assessments be
waived, they be allowed to keep the existing signs located on
the property, and they be immune from any sewer and water
hookup charges and Immune from future storm sewer assessments.
As part of the exchange, they would have no plans to change
the zoning, which is currently R-3. Future development would
limit access to the future collector road.
Dan Blonigen noted that he did not see that there was any
benefit to the City, and he suggested that negotiations be
terminated. It was his view that once the City obtains the
property through the tax delinquency process, things will fall
Into place.
Ken Maus noted that It may be true that the City will
ultimately obtain this property; however, we will still have
to sell It at that time, which means we will be in the same
position one year down the road.
Brad Fylo noted that he was against the land swap. tie would
prefer looking at a reduced assessment rather than an exchange
of land in lieu of cash.
Page 6
RX
Council Minutes - 6/10/91
Brad Larson was in attendance and noted that a storm water
pond could be created in the area with this proposal. The
proposal provides a potential for assisting with the
redevelopment of the Gille property.
After discussion, it was the general consensus of Council to
take the following action prior to making a decision:
Obtain Housing and Redevelopment Authority reaction
to the overall proposal and determine to what
extent it is important that the City obtain the
West Prairie Partnership property next to the Gills
property.
2. Determine how valuable the storm water ponding area
at this location is to the City.
Determine what assistance from the state is
available to help determine the extent of pollution
at the Gills property and to help finance cleanup
activities.
13. Review current status regardinq delinquent utility accounts
and payment policy.
Administrator Wolfsteller reported that with utilization of
the computer system, the City now has greater ability to
monitor the status of delinquent sewer and water accounts and
has established a policy of sending reminder notices to
delinquent accounts on a pre -determined schedule.
Administrator Wolfsteller noted that at least 75 accounts are
delinquent, all of which have received warning notices that
their water could bR nhut off if they do not pay their sewor
and water bill. Wolfsteller went on to request Council to
consider development of a policy regarding partial payment of
utility accounts.
Ken Maus noted that if the City is going to be shutting off
water, it would make sense to shut off water to those accounts
that have been delinquent for the longest period of time.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to begin
shutting off water to the 75 delinquent accounts. It was the
consensus of Council to require individuals that have a
problem in paying their utility bill to tomo before Council to
explain the situation. In addition, an alternative plan for
making partial payments of delinquent utility accounts was
also reviewod and approved by consensus.
Page 7
CD-
Council Minutes - 6/10/91
14. Consideration of re -bids for emergency generator for water and
sewer collection department.
John Simola reported that at the last meeting the City Council
reviewed bids for the purchase of a portable trailer -mounted
125 kW generator to be used for powering well 03 or two
booster pumps at the reservoir and various lift stations. Two
bids were received, one from Catepillar in the amount of
$42,759 and one from Cummins Diesel In the amount of $41,876.
The budget for this item was estimated at $35,000. Simola
reported that the re -bids did come in on Monday and that the
low bid is less than the low bid associated with the original
bidding process. Low bid was submitted by Flaherty Equipment
Corporation at $33,925.
Dan Blonigen requested that the City scrutinize the bid
submitted by the low bidder to make sure that the bid is in
compliance with specifications.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded
by Clint Herbst to purchase the 125 kW portable powered
generator from Flaherty Equipment Corporation In the amount of
$33,925 subject to the bid being in compliance with the bid
apuVliications. Motion carried unanimously.
15. Consideration of orderino signal justification studv for the
intersection of County Stato Aid Hiqhway East 75, 39, and 118.
John Simola reported that the County Board acted to direct the
county engineer to sign a signal justification study and
forward it to the state aid office in St. Paul for review
subject to the following conditions.
The first condition is that the City take the load and use its
engineer to put together the signal justification study. This
study puts together all the available information regarding
the intersection and forms a rationale justifying that a
signal is needed at this location.
Since this particular Intersection has not mot the state aid
warrants duo to traffic volumes, the county does not wish to
take the risk that the signal justification study will be
denied by the office of state aid. Therefore, they requested
that the City conduct the study. Simola reported that the
cost to do the study would be $2,950. If the signal
justification study is successful, this would be considered as
part of the overall foe for engineering on the project. In
addition, there appear to be enough indications that the
signal justification study will be successful. If it is not,
Page 8
R
/ Council Minutes - 6/10/91
l a portion of the background work and much of it could be
utilized during the next justification study.
Finally, Simola went on to recommend that the City go ahead
and direct the City Engineer to complete the study. There
have been too many close calls at the intersection to wait any
longer for the county to move on the signal; therefore, Simola
recommended that this justification study be authorized.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded
by Shirley Anderson to authorize the study. Motion carried
unanimously.
16. Consideration of approvinq qamblinq license renewal --VFW Club.
The City Council reviewed the application and took no action
to deny the renewal; therefore, the application is approved.
17. Consideration of approvinq gamblinq license renewal --American
Leqion Club.
The City Council reviewed the application and took no action =
to deny the renewal; therefore, the application is approved.
18. Consideration of appointing a fifth Individual to the parks
commission.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reminded Council that a
vacancy remains on the parks commission. Roger Carlson has
stopped forward to volunteer to fill the remaining vacant
position on the parka commission. tie went on to review
Carlson's background as outlined in his application.
A motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Brad
Fyfe to appoint Roger Carlson to the parks commission. Motion
carried unanimously.
There being no further discussion, the mooting was adjourned.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
Page 9
V
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
Public Hearing--Delinauent sewer and water accounts. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the previous meeting, the Council was updated on the status
and collection efforts regarding delinquent sewer and water
utility accounts. Notices were sent to many property owners
who were more than 60 days delinquent on their accounts, and
the Council also approved a delinquent account payment policy
that would allow delinquent accounts the ability to pay off
their delinquent accounts within 90 days to avoid
disconnection of their water service.
Our City ordinances also indicate that a property owner can
request a public hearing before the Council to explain their
situation as to why the City of Monticello should not
disconnect their water. If a customer requests a hearing
before the Council, the City does not commence with
disconnection until the property owner or responsible party
had an opportunity to present their case. To date, three
individuals have requested the opportunity to appear before
the Council in regard to their delinquent accounts. The
Individuals who may appear Monday night are:
Delinquent Account Balance
1. Tom Hass $108.87
2. Duff Davidson $113.47
3. James Cellette $374.37
These three individuals requested a Council hearing before our
new delinquent payment policy was established, but all three
were given the opportunity to make arrangements per our policy
if they wished. To date, none of the individuals has set up
a payment plan, so it is assumed they still wish to appear
before the Council to plead their case.
City Ordinance 7-2-19 (B) states that 1f, as a result of the
hearing, the City Council finds that the amount claimed to be
owing is actually due and unpaid and that there is no legal
reason why the water supply of the delinquent customer may not
be shut off in accordance with this ordinance, the City may
shut off the supply. Although I'm sure individual
circumstances vary, the previous statement in the ordinance
actually indicates that the hearing is really to only
establish whether or not a bill is legitimate and doesn't make
reference to special circumstances. The Council certainly has
that option to consider each individual's particular case.
The goal of the City should be to colloct the funds due and
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
not necessarily discontinue service; so if a payment plan or
arrangement is decided upon by the Council, our goal would be
met.
As I indicated above, none of the three individuals has
indicated or returned a signed agreement indicating payment
would be made within the next three months.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. After hearing testimony from the individual customer, the
Council could determine that the amount owing is just and
proceed with disconnection if the account is not paid.
2. If the amount is just, the Council could require the
customer to adhere to our collection policy to avoid
disconnection.
3. Based on each individual's circumstance, the Council
could establish a special payment plan for that
individual if the circumstances warranted.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff believes that the amounts owing by the Individuals
are just and legal. Assuming this to be fact, unless there
are unusual circumstances for these individuals, we can find
no reason why special consideration should be given to these
individuals other than allowing them to adhere to our
collection policy of a minimum payment of $25 or 25% of the
amount being paid up front with the balance payable over the
next three months. This procedure has been granted to a
number of individuals in an attempt to clear up our delinquent
accounts in the foreseeable future.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of ordinance section pertaining to public hearing; Copy
of delinquent collection policy; Customer's request for
hearing.
2
7-2-19: PRIVATE WATER NOT PERMITTED IN SYSTEM: Whenever any premises
are connected to the water system, there shall be
maintained a complete physical separation between the water supply
system and the private water supply system so that it is impossible to
intentionally or unintentionally allow any water produced by a private
system to be introduced in the supply line from the city system.
7-2-20: PROVISION FOR SHUT-OFF FOR NONPAYMENT:
(A) Shut-off for Nonpayment: The City shall endeavor to collect
delinquent accounts promptly. In any case where satisfactory
arrangements for payment have not been made, the Public Works
Department may, after the procedural requirements of Section B have
been complied with, discontinue service to the delinquent customer
by shutting off the water at the stop box. When water service to
any premises has been discontinued, service shall not be restored
except upon the payment of all delinquent amounts due plus a fee
for disconnection and reconnection of a fee schedule adopted by the
City Council
(11/23/81, b107)
(B) Procedure: Water shall not be shut off under Section A until
notice and an opportunity for a hearing have first been given the
occupant of the premises Involved. The notice shall be sent by
certified mail and shall state that if payment is not made before
a date stated in the notice but not less than 30 days after the
date on which the notice is given, the water supply to the premises
will be shut off. Such notice shall not be sent until an account
Is 60 days past due. The notice shall also state that the occupant
may, before such date, demand a hearing on the matter, in which
case the supply will not be cut off until after the hearing is
hold. If the customer requests a hearing before the date
specified, a hearing shall be held on the matter by the City
Council at least 15 days after the date on which the request is
made. If as a result of the hearing the City Council finds that
the amount claimed to be owing is actually due and unpaid and that
there is no legal reason why the water supply of the delinquent
customer may not be shut off in accordance with this ordinance, the
City may shut off the supply.
7-2-21: PROVISION FOR COLLECTION WITH TAXES: Delinquent accounts
shall be certified to the City Administrator who shall
prepare an assessment• roll each year providing for assessment of the
delinquent amounts against the respective properties served. The
assessment roll shall be delivered to the Council for adoption on or
before October 10 of each year. Upon such adoption, the Administrator
shall certify the assessment roll to the county auditor for collection
along with taxes.
(9/12/77, 036)
M.ONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE VII/Chpt 2/Pago9
0
( DELINQUENT UTILITY ACCOUNT
L COLLECTION PROCEDURE
When a property owner/resident requests to arrange for payment of
a delinquent utility account to avoid disconnection of service, the
following procedures shall be followed:
1. A minimum payment of $25.00 or 25% of the delinquent
bill, whichever is higher, must be paid by the date noted
on the disconnect notice.
2. The responsible party must agree in writing to a payment
schedule that pays the balance within 3 months.
(i.e., 1/3 per month, "X" dollars per week, etc.)
3. The property owner must agree to not allow future utility
bills to become delinquent during the repayment time
period.
4. The City will commence disconnection of water upon:
A. default on payment schedule agreed to, or
B. additional utility bills becoming delinquent.
DELINQ.pRCs 6/6/41
0
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362.9245
Phone: (612) 295.2711
Metro: (612) 333.5739
Fax: (612) 295.4404,
ACCOUNT NUMBER
LOCATION
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
OWNER NAME
OWNER ADDR
DELINOUENT UTILITY BILLING
COLLECTION PROCEDURE
To avoid disconnection of water service:
1. The delinquent utility billing total must be paid in full by
the disconnect date of
OR
2. A minimum of $25.00 or 25% of the delinquent bill, whichever
Is higher, must be paid at the time arrangements are made for
a paymont schedule (see next page).
OR
3. Prior to the disconnect date, a request must be made, in
writing, to appear before the City Council. Pending the
outcome of the hearing, arrangements will then be made for
payment of the delinquent bill.
0
DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLING
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
I agree to pay my delinquent utility billing within three months
according to the schedule below. I understand that I must make at
least one payment a month and I must not allow any current or
future utility bills to become delinquent during this period of
time. I also agree to pay an additional 10% service fee (based on
the total unpaid balance as of today's date).
If I fail to abide by this agreement, I will be subject to having
water service disconnected without further notice.
TOTAL DELINQUENT BALANCE S
•Initial Payment S
NET DELINQUENT TOTAL S
10% Service Charge S
TOTAL BALANCE DUE $
AMOUNT DUE DATE
Payment 1: $
Payment 2: $
Payment l: S
••Payment must be postmarked by due date or will be
considered in violation of this agreement.
Signature
Date
RETURN INITIAL PAYMENT AMOUNT WITH 'PHIS SIGNED AGREEMENT PRIOR TO
DISCONNECT DATE.
0
DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLING
COLLECTION PROCEDURE
To avoid disconnection of water service:
1. The delinquent utility billing total must be paid in full by
the disconnect date of
OR
2. A minimum of $25.00 or 25% of the delinquent bill, whichever
is higher, must be paid at the time arrangements are made for
a payment schedule (see next page).
OR
3. Prior to the disconnect date, a request must be made, in
writing, to appear before the City Council. Pending the
outcome of tho hearing, arrangements will then be made for
payment of tho delinquent bill.
Ouea h01- w, -:it- — W. It e1P?e�r eat Cv✓��.1 l��-+'k�
On '5L" gqi-- jegord- P- 5-f dut_ GiCCv.�y.
1'r77�G
/.
0
8 LINN ST
DATE DATE 4/22/91
BsuR. w n.n Ww m .pT m av m«mus ,www b wrmM o� Tmn
wmw...�.om,ow.v. um mnmw. aw. m.v.n D.e�mw.+w
ACCOUNT NO. 10035-00-00
\`
DQCON CTWM TRIC COMKMa AT CM) A.M. OM TMe DATE IMDICATED
oM no MOTm. YOUR 13 u MUST K nuD amen To TMn nre.
PREVIOUS
"
BALANCE 141.51
n TrwM v avmm.vw, m wmr vvu a ,fcmvucuv „ma w wmn m.4 .m
oMW.a mama .M • cons. m azo 0o m, ,Mw.vcuon cuv�p mow +m..
PENALTY 5.36
DATE OF DISCONNECTION: 6/0 6 / Q 1
.
BALANCE
DUE 196.87
Il
r
ay43
•
THOMAS HASS
Ruby Haas 3Y cU
PO BOX 1070
8 Linn Str/ 10
MONTICELLO MN 55362
Monticello/
_
L
J
1
City of Monticello • P.O. Box 1147 • Monticello, MN 55362 • 295-2711
DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLING
COLLECTION PROCEDURE
To avoid disconnection of water service:
1. The delinquent utility billing total must be paid in full by
the disconnect date of
OR
2. A minimum of $25.00 or 25% of the delinquent bill, whichever
is higher, must be paid at the time arrangements are made for
a payment schedule (see next page).
OR
3. Prior to the disconnect date, a request must be made, in
writing, to appear before the City Council. Pending the
outcome of tho hearing, arrangements will then be made for
payment of tho delinquent bill.
Ouea h01- w, -:it- — W. It e1P?e�r eat Cv✓��.1 l��-+'k�
On '5L" gqi-- jegord- P- 5-f dut_ GiCCv.�y.
1'r77�G
/.
0
r� 0 �
tlllll 143 HEDMAN LA DATE 4/22/91
,r
aY:.,,« •w �u.. r..« « rwr Y e- a.+cw r.a..Y. a «.•+m a raa
•«heY,wrYerw.n«+w wraa.ra.r�u.�«aY�.a.a ACCOUNT NO. 80424-00-00
mm
mond MrouCW■ICMus 1Tf ]OA YPIG to Nis not, ED
^ ow rrM Yor,ce. •oua m� rw* ■e .uq o■rw to mn n■n. PREVIOUS 360.35
BALANCE
. «n.s r entar•Yn.U, ro real NM it neWvct« w M WiR Mb W
14.02
�9 ^ea•*m+w^an PENALTY
DATE OFDISCONNECTIOW 6/06/91
�yx p BALANCE 374.37
*Ilnll JAMES CELLETTE
143 HUMAN LA coli^ t /
MONTICELLO MN 55362
L J
City of Monticello • P.O. Box 1147 • Monlicollo, MN 55962 • 295.2711
�.—. _...__.—_--_.— .----_---..-_------------- —Ti-
n
i
moved-� 2 T �/-•--��-�. �p.�.. � �e4elf v�,
- -
---------- --
fiHily
170 JERRY LIEFERT DR
4/22/91
� .
DATE
•' 1
•
D.[.W. Yar rr.w r.Y.• rp rM b oY Www. rpy..p Y Wlyrrr.rN W Y•W
-
'.]•:
'
u.gw.wc..row.vwamrwn .. enrarr.aamu+N •. m.mN.n..6-0075-00-00
odwom ttrgN �CONrcrce.r. 31 A. r, oNnu D.R.0"IM
ACCOUNT NO.
:..J,.
ON nm NOME. TOLM eu. rVOT U P.m Mop TO nm nw.
PREVIOUS 109.16
C
•
e mc.rrrr.a.a b wNr wu a r.cowcr.a ux. a rn.Nr sw .re
BALANCE
• : �'
�•
MrWrW mWWnW M.UND.d L'9 oDb rsenn.nvr W,rep rorwY 4•
4.29
•.4
•
Vr.W.. n... Dwr, ..d
6/06/91
PENALTY
DATE OF DISCONNECTION:
BALANCE113.47
y
NN
I
DUE
jar±
DUFF DAVIDSON
170 JERRY LIEFERT DR
MONTICELLO MN 55362
L
J
City of Montieollo • P.O. Bo. 1147 • Montieollo, MN 55362 • 295.2711
:.r•
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
5. Consideration of approval of development agreement qoverninq
City/developer installed improvements --Briar Oakes Estate
Phase I. (J.0.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City Council is asked to review the updated draft of a
developer agreement which outlines terms and conditions
associated with the development of phase I of Briar Oakes
Estate. A final draft of the agreement is not available at
this time, as the City Attorney has not had a chance to review
recent changes to the agreement. Although the final language
is not final, all of the terms noted in the agreement have
been approved by the developer. The remainder of this agenda
supplement will highlight certain aspects of the agreement and
note areas that may be of special concern to Council.
ITEM 2. (4) The developer has already deposited $22,000 to
the City for the purpose of expediting the
planning process associated with installing
streets and utilities. At such time that the
project is commenced, the City will release
the $22,000 to the developer and incorporate
public improvement planning costs into the
total project costs.
ITEM 6. ASBOSBment of Costs
city completes project as a public improvement
project with the total coat estimated at $279,390
to be assessed equally against each lot developed
with phase I.
ITEM 7. Escrow Items
An escrow fund will be establishod to guarantee
that certain on-site improvements are constructed
by the developer. Such improvements include site
grading, roadbed preparation, and boulevard sod.
ITEM 13. Security for Improvements
Staff has redesigned this aspect of the agreement
proviously submitted to Council. As you recall,
t ho previous agreement required that the developer
provide an irrovocablo letter of crodit in the
amount of 40% ($115,000) of the project cost. This
amount would be available for draw by the City in
t ho event that the devoloper fails to stay curront
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
with assessment payments. In addition, the
previous draft required that the City release one
lot from the assessment against the total
development only after a payment of 1.5 times the
cost per lot. Under this formula, the unsecured
portion of the assessment debt would be secure
after 11 of the 28 lots are sold.
After further negotiation and after reviewing the
administrative problems associated with managing
the mechanism for releasing lots, it was determined
that this aspect of the agreement should be changed
by increasing the letter of credit requirement from
409 to 609. In addition, the new agreement calls
for assessing each lot individually. Lots will be
released from the assessment when the assessment
for the single lot is paid. The term of the
assessment was also charged from five to seven
years.
It is the view of City staff that the new
arrangement provides essentially the same level of
security as was provided under the proposal
reviewed and given concept approval previously.
In summary, the City's investment is protected as
follows: The total project cost is spread evenly
across the 27 lots developed via the special
assessment process. The assessment against each
lot will be paid via equal installments over a
seven-year period at an interest rate determined
later by Council. If the developer fails to make
annual installments or only makes a portion of the
installments, the City can draw down on the letter
of credit to fund the difference.
The letter of credit in the amount of $167,634
(609) is reduced only when the assessment balance
against all the individual lots combined becomes
leas than the letter of credit. This will occur
after 11 lots are sold.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the development agreement governing
City/developer improvements (Briar Oakes Estate) subject
to final revisions.
Under this alternative, Council is comfortable with the
basic provisions outlined in the agreement. As noted
earlier, the copy you are being presented is not the
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
final copy; however, all terms have been agreed to by the
developer. It is our hope that the final version will be
available for review on Monday. At that time, staff will
review any changes to the copy you have and possibly
detail the agreement further.
2. Motion to deny adoption of development agreement.
If Council is not comfortable with the development
agreement, approval could be denied or modified.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is our view that this agreement provides security for the
City in terms of many of the risks associated with residential
development. In terms of financial risk, it is our view that
the agreement sufficiently protects the City; therefore, we
support its adoption.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of development agreement.
5
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
CITY/DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS
BRIAR OAKES ESTATE PHASE I
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of
1991, by and between Prestige Builders of St. Cloud, referred to
herein as "Developer," and the City of Monticello, a municipal
corporation in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota,
hereinafter referred to as "City";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer is the fee owner and developer of a parcel or
parcels of land described in Exhibit A ("subject property"), and
which property is proposed to be developed bearing the name Briar
Oakes Estate First Addition; and
WHEREAS, the City requires that certain public improvements, which
are herein referred to as "Petition Items," including, but not
limited to, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, streets, and
asphalt walkway, be installed by City to serve the development, all
at the expense of the Developer; and
WHEREAS, the City further requires that certain on and off-site
improvements be installed by the Developer within the subject
property, which improvement typically consists of boulevard sod or
seed, trees, storm water retention ponds and drainage swales, and
which improvements to the subject property shall be referred to
herein as "escrow items"; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into for the purpose of setting
forth and memorializing for the parties and subsequent owners the
understandings and agreements of the parties concerning the
development of the subject property;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AND HEREIN MUTUALLY AGREED, in
consideration of each party's promises and considerations herein
set forth, as follows:
Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the
City to approve a plat for Briar Oakes Estate First
Addition, a 28 -lot singlo family subdivision (also
referred to in this Agroement as the "plat") of the land
legally described as: See Exhibit A.
Conditions of Plat Approval. The City agroos to approve
the plat on the condition (1) that the Developer enter
into this Agreements (2) that the Developer provide tho
BRIAGREE.TWO: 6/21/91
Pago 1
0
necessary security in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement guarantying the payment of the special
assessments herein, including interest and principal, for
public improvements and guarantying compliance of the
terms of this Agreement; (3) the Developer obtains
approval of the final plat in accordance with City rules
and ordinances and files the same along with the
restrictive covenants in the office of the Wright County
Recorder no later than August 1, 1991; (4) As of 6/19/91,
the Developer has delivered cash deposits in the amount
of $22,480 to City to be utilized for all expenses
incurred by City associated with making preparations for
installation of petition items. On the date of the
commencement of the work on petition items, the cash
deposit shall be returned to Developer. Expenses covered
by the cash deposit shall be incorporated into the total
project cost and assessed against the lots platted with
phase I of the Briar Oakes Estate plat.
Effect of Plat Approval. For three (3) years from the
date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City's
comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or
affect the use, development, density, lot size, lot
layout, or dedications or platting required or permitted
by the approved preliminary plat unless required by state
or federal law or agreed to to writing by the City and
the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in
this Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent
permitted by state law, the City may require compliance
with any amendments to the City's comprehensive plan,
official controls, platting or dedication requirements
enacted after the date of this Agreement and may require
submission of a new plat.
Use and Density. The plat shall allow a maximum of 28
single family lots. The plat must show all necessary
street and roadway easements and shall be subject to the
review and approval of the City Engineer and, if
applicable, the Wright County Traffic Engineer.
Petition Items (City Installed Items). Subject to the
performance by Developer of the covenants contained in
paragraph 2, City agrees to construct as part of an
improvement project the petition items as detailed on
Exhibit B pursuant to its regular method of making
improvements.
BRIAGREE.TWO: 6/21/91
Page 2
0
City shall commence work on the petition items within
sixty (60) days of the Developer's compliance with
paragraph 2 and shall use its best efforts to complete
the improvement in a prompt manner, subject to delays
beyond its control.
Assessment of Costs. Developer agrees that City shall
assess the cost of the petition items together with
administrative planning, engineering, capitalized
interest, legal, and bonding costs against the entire
plat in the estimated amount of $279,390, to be assessed
equally against each lot developed with phase I
improvements. The assessment shall be deemed adopted by
the City on the date that construction is commenced. The
assessments shall be paid over a seven-year period,
without deferment, together with interest at a rate set
by the City. The Developer waives any and all procedural
and substantive objections to the installation of the
public improvements and the assessments, including notice
and hearing and any claim that the assessment exceeds the
benefits to the property. The Developer waives any
appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 429.081. Nothing contained herein
shall prevent the developers from prepaying the
assessments in whole or in part.
Escrow Items (Developer Installed Items). The Developer
shall pay for and install the following improvements:
See attached Exhibit C.
The improvements shall be installed in accordance with
City standards, ordinances, plans, and specifications,
which have been prepared by a competent registered
professional engineer, furnished to the City, and
approved by the City Engineer. The City may, at its
option, contract with a separate engineer to review any
plans and spocifications or work performed by the
Developer at the Developer's expense. The Developer
shall instruct his engineer to provide adequate field
inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of
quality control to the extant that the Developer's
engineer will be able to certify that the construction
work meets the approved City standards as a condition of
City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the
City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have
one or more City inspectors and soil engineers inspect
the work on a full-time or part-time basis. The
Developer or his ongineer shall schedule a
preconstruction meeting at a mutually agrooable time at
the City Council Chambers with all parties concerned,
including City staff, to review the program for
BRIAGREE.TWO: 6/21/91 Pago 3
0
construction work. The Developer shall complete the work
required by this paragraph by October 15, 1991. The date
required for completion will be extended for a period
equal to the time lost due to delays reasonably beyond
the control of the Developer. Such delays shall include
delays caused by fire, flood, labor disputes, epidemics,
weather conditions, material or equipment shortages, or
acts of God. The Developer may, however, request an
extension of time from the City for other causes, which
extension shall be granted at the reasonable discretion
of the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be
conditioned upon updating the security posted by the
Developer to reflect cost increases, if any.
B. Grading Plan. The plat shall be graded and drainage
provided by the Developer in accordance with a grading
plan to control drainage and erosion. Any drainage or
flooding problems and property damage onto adjacent
properties resulting from the development of the subject
property shall be the responsibility of the Developer for
the correction of any said damages, including total costs
of correction and compensation to those properties
affected.
As the development progresses, the City may impose
additional erosion control requirements if, in the
opinion of the City Engineer, they are necessary to
prevent damage to adjacent properties or to prevent
unreasonable erosion. The Developer shall comply with
the drainage and erosion control plans and with any such
additional instructions it receives from the City. All
areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling
operation shall be reseeded forthwith after the
completion of the work in that area. Seed shall be rye
grass or other fast-growing seed suitable to the existing
soil to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as
possible. All seed areas shall be mulched and disc
anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties
recognized that time is of the essence in controlling
erosion.
Landscaping.
Boulevard Grass. The Developer shall sod or seed all
boulevard areas improved with phase I of the development.
Sodding or seeding shall be done upon completion of the
public improvements. Maintenance of the grass in the
boulevard areas shall be the responsibility of the
Developer.
BRIAGREE.TWO: 6/21/91 Pago 4
0
Private Lawns. Sodding and seeding of yard areas are the
responsibility of the property owner and regulated under
the restrictive covenants recorded against each lot.
Trees. Developer shall plant trees as follows:
(1) Number. At least one tree shall be planted in the
front yard of each property located entirely on a cul-de-
sac. For all other lots, at least two trees shall be
planted in the front yard; (2) Planting Location. Trees
shall be planted inside the front property line at a
distance not greater than four feet (4') from such line.
This tree is to be planted if there are no suitable
existing trees in this location; (3) Required
subdivision trees must have a trunk diameter of at least
two inches (2") at one foot (1') above the ground;
(4) Not less than two (2) or more than three (3) species
of trees shall be planted in any block and neither less
than twenty percent (20%) nor more than fifty percent
(50%) of the total trees planted in a block may be of the
same species. Species proposed by the Developer shall be
approved by the City Tree Inspector; (5) Trees must be
protected and supported by tree guards of approved type;
(6) No required subdivision tree shall be planted in soil
too poor to insure the growth of such tree unless twenty-
seven (27) cubic feet (3'x3'x3') of soil is removed and
replaced with suitable loam; (7) Tree Planting Timing.
Trees shall be planted on individual lots after a
building permit has been issued and before issuance of
the occupancy permit. This requirement shall not apply
as to homes that are constructed and otherwise eligible
for Certificates of Occupancy between the months of
November and April. In such circumstances, Developer
warrants that the requirements of this paragraph shall be
completed as soon as reasonably possible after April 1.
10. Warranty. The Developer warrants all work required to be
performed by it against poor material and faulty
workmanship for a period of one (1) year after its
completion and acceptance by the City. All grass and sod
supplied or planted by Developer shall be warranted to be
alive, of good quality, and disease free for twelve (12)
months after planting. Any replacements shall be
warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of
planting. All trees purchased by Developer shall be
warranted by the supplier for a period of twelve (12)
months. Developer shall assign said warranties to City
following the purchase thereof. The warranties and
securities required by this paragraph shall terminate as
to each parcel at the time of conveyance of each parcel
to a subsequent owner.
BRIAGREE.TWO: 6/21/91
Pago 5
0
11. License. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents,
employees, officers, and contractors a license to enter
the plat to perform all necessary work and/or inspections
deemed appropriate by the City during the installation of
petition items by City and escrow items by Developer.
The license shall expire after all improvements installed
pursuant to this development contract have been installed
and accepted by the City.
12. Ownership of Improvements. Upon the completion of the
work and construction required to be done by this
Agreement, the public improvements lying within public
easement shall become City property without further
notice or action.
13. Security for Improvements. As and for partial security
for the unpaid assessments and other work required under
the terms of this agreement, Developer shall furnish the
City with a cash escrow fund in the amount of 3
and one (1) irrevocable letter of credit in favor of City
which shall remain in full force and effect until
released as provided herein.
The cash escrow fund shall be utilized primarily to
insure performance of the Escrow Items described in
paragraphs 7 through 9 and outlined in Exhibit D. With
City approval, the cash escrow fund for said Escrow Items
may be written down, from time to time, upon completion
and payment in full of the specific obligations as
detailed in said paragraphs 7 through 9 and outlined in
Exhibit D. The City Engineer shall determine, in his
sole discretion, if the obligation has been completed in
accordance with the terms of this agreement and the
amount of reduction in the cash escrow fund, if any.
The letter of credit shall be furnished to City in the
amount of $173,700 or 60% of the cost to install Petition
Items required by paragraph 5.
In the event the letter of credit must be renewed on an
annual basis, Developer shall cause the bank issuing the
letter of credit to advise City no less than thirty (30)
days prior to the date of the stated renewal date that
the bank will renew the letter of credit under the same
terms and conditions. In the event City does not receive
such assurances from the bank within thirty (30) days of
the date of its renewal date, Developer will be in
default under its obligations to City herein, and City
shall be entitled to draw against said letter of crodit
for its ontiro stated amount.
BRIAGREE.TWO: 6/21/91 Pago 6
0
If any installment of special assessments is not paid
when due, and in any event before any penalty is
attached, the City may draw down the letter of credit to
pay off the balance due on the delinquent installment.
14. Release of Lots. The City shall release a lot as
designated by Developer if all principal and interest
assessed against said lot is paid in full. The original
principal amount assessed against each lot shall be an
amount equal to the total cost of petition items divided
by 27.
With City approval, the letter of credit for said
Petition Items may be written down, from time to time,
when the combined principal and interest balance against
individual lots is reduced to the point where the
combined principal and interest expense becomes less than
the balance of the letter of credit. The City
Administrator shall determine, in his sole discretion,
the amount of reduction in the letter of credit, if any.
(At such time that 75% of the lots have been aold and
assessment payments made in full, the City shall release
Q
the remaining balance of the letter of credit so long as
5/ the value of the unsold lots exceeds the assessment
amount remaining against said lots. The City
/ Administrator shall determine, in his sole discretion,
the amount of reduction in the letter of credit, if any.
15. Surety Deficiency. In the event that any cash, corporate
surety bond, letter of credit, or other surety referred
to herein is ever utilized and found to be deficient in
amount to pay or reimburse the City in total as required
herein, the Developer agrees that upon being billed by
the City, Developer wil pay within thirty (30) days of
receipt of said billing the said deficient amount. If
there should be an overage in the amount of utilized
security, the City, upon making said determination, shall
refund to the Developer any monies which the City has in
its possession which aro in excess of the actual costs of
the project as paid by the City. All monies deposited
within the City shall be used by the City at the City's
discretion to defray the City's costs and expenses
connected with the project.
16. Responsibility For Costs.
A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer
shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in
conjunction with the development of the plat,
including, but not limited to, legal, planning,
engineering, and inspection expenses incurred in
BRIAGREE.TWO: 6/21/91
Page 7
9
connection with approval and acceptance of the
plat, the preparation of this contract, and all
costs and expenses incurred by the City in
monitoring and inspecting development of the plat.
The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted
to it by the City for obligations incurred under
this contract within thirty (30) days after
receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the
City may halt all plat development work and
construction, including, but not limited to, the
release of lots after sale and the issuance of
building permits, until the bills are paid in full,
or apply to the letters of credit as described
herein.
The Developer shall hold the City and its officers
and employees harmless from claims made by itself
and/or third parties for damages sustained or costs
incurred to public or private property or injury to
persons resulting from plat approval and
development. The Developer shall indemnify the
City and its officers and employees for all costs,
damages, or expenses which City may pay or incur in
consequence of such claims, including attorneys'
fees. This indemr.:fication shall not extend to
costs attributable to the City's own negligence or
that of its agents or employees.
The Developer shall reimburse the City for all
damage to property of Developer incurred in
connection with the escrow items performed by
Developer.
The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs
incurred in the enforcement of this contract,
including engineering and attorneys' fees.
17. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the
Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it or
any of its obligations hereunder, the City may, at its
option, in addition to any other remedies available to
it, suspend its performance duties under this Agreement,
enjoin the default by court order, or perform the work or
obligation roquirod of Developer.
In the event City acts to perform the work obligation,
the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any
expense incurred by the City, or the City may, at its
option, draw on the escrow account as provided for by
this Agreement provided the Developer is first given
BRIAGREE.TWO: 6/21/91
Pago 8
0
written notice of the work or obligation in default, not
less than 48 hours in advance in the event the default
constitutes an emergency. For the purposes of this
paragraph, an emergency is defined as a condition which
presents an imminent hazard to the public health, safety,
and welfare of the citizens of city. For defaults which
are of a non -emergency nature, the Developer shall be
given ten (10) days prior written notice.
This Agreement is a license of the City to act, and it
shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order
for permission to enter the land. When the City does any
such work, the City may apply to the escrow account for
reimbursement, or, in addition to its other remedies,
assess the cost in whole or in part. The Developer, its
successors and assigns, as well as future lot purchasers,
waive all procedural and substantive objections to the
improvements and special assessments, including, but not
limited to, any claim that the assessments exceed the
benefit to the property, that proper notices have not
been given, and that the method of spreading the
assessment is erroneous, as well as any appeal rights
otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A., Section 429.081.
18. Clean Up. Developer shall promptly clear from public
streets and property any soil, earth, or debris resulting
from construction work performed by the Developer, its
agents or assigns. The City shall promptly clean debris
from city streets and from the plat any soil, earth, or
debris resulting from construction work performed by or
on behalf of the City.
19. Miscellaneous.
A. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties,
their heirs, successors or assigns, as the case may
be.
B. Third parties shall have no recourse against any
party under this Agreement.
C. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the
Developer shall be grounds for denial of building
permits, including all or part of said plat sold to
third parties.
D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence,
clause, paragraph or phrase of this Agreement is
for any reason hold invalid, such decision shall
not affect the validity of the remaining portion of
this Agreement.
BRIAGREE.TWO: 6/21/91 Pago 9
O
E. So long as the City uses its best efforts to
construct the petition items, Developer agrees to
assume the risk of damage to Developer attributable
to any delays in completing the petition items.
F. No one may occupy a building for which a building
permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent
basis until sanitary sewer and water lines have
been installed, hooked up, tested, and approved by
the City, and until the streets needed for access
have been paved with a bituminous surface.
G. The action or inaction of the City shall not
constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions
of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or
waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties
and approved by written resolution of the City
Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal
action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a
waiver or release.
H. The Developer represents to the City that, to the
best of the Developer's knowledge, the plat does
not require an environmental assessment worksheet
or an environmental impact statement. The City
hereby waives its right to require an environmental
assessment worksheet provided, however, that in the
event that subsequent facts become known to the
City that the City's reasonable judgment indicates
a need for an environmental assessment worksheet,
an environmental assessment worksheet shall be
prepared in compliance with applicable legal
requirements. Developer shall reimburse the City
for all expenses, including staff time and
attorneys' fees, that the City incurs in connection
with the preparation of the environmental
assessment worksheet.
Future residents of the plat shall not be deemed to
be third party beneficiarios of this Agreement.
J. The Developer represents to the City that to the
beat of Developer's knowledge the plat complies
with all city, county, state, and federal laws and
regulations including, but not limited to,
subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and
environmental regulations. If the City
subsequently determines that the plat does not
comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to
BRIAGREE.TWO: 6/21/91 Page 10
0.5-
allow any construction or development work in the
plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the
City's demand, the Developer shall cease until
there is compliance.
K. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be
recorded against the title of the property. After
the Developer has completed the work required of it
under this Agreement, at the Developer's request
the City will execute and deliver to the Developer
a release which shall be in recordable form.
L. Each right, power, or remedy herein conferred upon
the City is cumulative and in addition to every
other right, power, or remedy, expressed or
implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the
City, at law or in equity, power, and remedy herein
set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised
from time to time as often or and in such order as
may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not
be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time
thereafter any other right, power, or remedy.
20. Agreement Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon
and extend to the representatives, heirs, successors, and
assigns of the parties hereto.
CITY OF MONTICELLO PRESTIGE BUILDERS OF ST. CLOUD
By: By:
Kenneth Maus, Mayor Kevin Schmitz
By:
Rick Wolfsteller
City Administrator
BRIAGREE.TWO: 6/21/91 Page 11
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
CITY OF MONTICELLO) SS
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
On this day of , 1991, before me
personally appeared Kenneth Maus and Rick Wolfsteller to me known
to be the persons described in the foregoing instrument and who did
say they are respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the
municipal corporation named therein and that said instrument was
signed on behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its
City Council, and said Kenneth Maus and Rick Wolfsteller
acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said
corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) SS
On this day of 1991, before me
personally appoarod to me known
to be the persons described in the foregoing instrument and who did
say they are partners of the corporation name therein, and that
said instrument was signed on behalf of raid corporation by
authority of its partners and said partners acknowledged said
instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation.
Notary Public
BRIAGREE.TWO, 6/21/91 Pago 12
BRIAR OAKES ESTATE
IMP
• — •-------------
I y
agar -
S eT
°,D �a'D t �w !r-'0,. i•%'y E; 1 .�..
j 1 Nz
r nr _Y
ELI -
f w `'. t.. 't e'� g►a t�.c
� e �w" s t`` � ° `� 10'1 ti $+� ��,`,. � ;5t �.,-•
t!°�-j•'f`�� .r• • � -"'` .i""...� :.'
fWtt0i"M1iu.Ma ®I+'o
ave. rma•o"
a .ws ,ra wine. r s n wsr s.
I — .
EXHIBIT B
PETITION ITEMS
BRIAR OAKES ESTATE
Item
Estimated Coat
Including 24%
Indirect
Sanitary Sewer $ 74,200
Water Main
Storm Sewer
$ 73,900
$ 33,790
Streets, Including Curb 6 Gutter $ 97,500
TOTAL $289,500
-279,390
Lot coat based on 27 lots $ 10,347
•If Lot 6, Block 1, Is deemed buildable by the Army Corps of
Engineers, it will be free and clear of assessments.
EXHIBIT C
ESCROW ITEMS
BRIAR OAKES ESTATE
Item Escrow Amount
Pond grading and excavation335,000
A 660 d0
Roadway grading and compaction 530,000
Seeding/sod $ 6,000
Trees (46) S 4,600
Island entrance $ 500
61,101)
Ds
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
6. Consideration of approval of final plat phase I, Briar Oakes
Estate. Applicant, Prestiqe Builders. 0 .O.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you recall, at the previous meeting of the City Council
this item was tabled because the final plat was not available
at meeting time, the development agreement had not been
finalized, and the Army Corps of Engineers had not yet
provided written approval of the grading and drainage plan.
In addition, there were some other items that needed to be
completed, which included preparation of separate
documentation outlining the walkway easement areas and
finalization and signing of the restrictive covenants.
Despite the fact that a number of issues remained unsolved
with regard to the final plat, City Council went ahead and
ordered plans and specifications for improvements associated
with this development subject to the developer providing funds
sufficient to cover the cost to prepare said plans. The
developer in turn did provide funds sufficient to cover the
City cost through the bidding process, and the City Engineer,
therefore, completed plans and specifications.
Most of the items have now been completed that remained
unresolved or incomplete two weeks ago. Following is a review
of the those items.
FINAL PLAT
The final plat has boon completed and is attached for your
review. Staff has reviewed the plat and it appears to be
satisfactory.
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS APPROVAL OF GRADING PLAN
I have reviewed the grading plan with Vern Riter of the Army
Corps of Engineers. He has informed me that the grading plan
is definitely acceptable and no special permit is required if
one of the lots (Lot 6, Block 1) abutting the central pond is
not filled as was originally proposed, which would reduce the
number of buildable lots from 27 to 28. On the other hand, he
noted that he has not completed his review of the grading
plan, and it is possible that all of the lots along the pond
area could be filled as originally proposed, which would moan
that no changes would need to be made to the final plat and
all 28 lots would be buildable.
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
As of the writing of this memo, the development agreement is
not finalized; however, there appears to be agreement between
City staff and the developer on major issues. In addition,
the City Attorney has not had the opportunity to review the
amendments made to the agreement which he originally drafted.
WALKWAY EASEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND SIGNED RESTRICTIVE
COVENANTS
These documents have not been provided to date. Council may
wish to make signing of the plat contingent on the developer
providing such.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the Briar Oakes Estate final plat
subject to the following conditions:
1. Final configuration of Lots 7, 6, 5, Block 1, to
depend on Army Corps of Engineers input. If Lot 6
cannot be filled and become buildable, then the
land area occupied by Lot 6 shall be distributed to
Lots 7 and 5.
2. Signing of the plat to be withheld until delivery
to the City of walkway oasemont documentation and
two signed copies of the restrictive covenents.
Under this alternative, it is assumed that the
development agreement has been adopted Council.
2. Motion to deny or table approval of the final plat of the
Briar Oakes Estate Phase i.
If full information and agreements regarding this
development are not in place, Council may wish to table
the matter. Under this alternative, the public
improvement process could continue to move forward, as
approval of the plans and specifications and authorizing
advertisement for bids can be conducted despite the fact
that the final plat and development agreement have not
been approved.
As you recall, the plans and specifications and the
bidding process have already boon financed by the
developer; therefore, continuation of the improvement
process would be at no financial risk to the City. The
development agreement approval could occur at a
subsequent Council meeting but no later than the date at
d
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
which the project is ordered. The bid process in place
calls for Council consideration of bids to occur July 22,
1991. This is the date at which all issues relating to
the final plat must be resolved.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
If the development agreement is completed and acceptable to
Council, then staff recommends that the plat be approved per
alternative 11.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the final plat.
BRIAR OAKES ESTATE
.✓.nrr i
---------------------------------
----
31
v^oi 6p
.I `1
I
1
♦ 1
—� �`� ''' a ��.r ata 4,a`y ,,[• ^' .O i, .Fk� r �`
.. •torr _
\\:� �rl.•s • ro ;� { , ':;'
— i =�'a \q jYf �A �'�'. D • e'.e+ tl �.9 a e�''� a
Or
:•Jr•= -moi • •- T;'o;1;ei -•... �' o
- ;• rl Z• • : , 1
u.wauu.ne.ara •• n •• •; � ,
urn ,r xri.s•n a.�•. \ .. Y •.., ri .------------.
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
7. Consideration of a rezoning request to rezone Outlet I, Meadow
Oaks subdivision, from an R -PUD (residential planned unit
development) to R-1 (single family residential) zone.
Applicant, Prestige Builders of St. Cloud. (J.0.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the previous meeting of the City Council, this item was
tabled pending approval of the final plat. If the final plat
is approved by Council, then this agenda item should be
considered. The remainder of this agenda supplement is a copy
of information provided previously to Council.
Planning Commission conducted a public hearing an approved the
proposed rezoning based on the finding that the Briar Oakes
subdivision is designed to sufficiently integrate with the
adjoining PUD areas; the rezoning is consistent with the
comprehensive plan, geography and the character of the area;
and the rezoning will allow development of "move -up" single
family building lots which are in short supply at this time.
City Council is asked to consider rezoning Outlet I from the
PUD zoning designation to the R-1 designation. If the Council
Is comfortable with the design of Briar Oakes Estate in terms
of integration with the original PUD, then the zoning map
should be amended as proposed.
The original concept plan for development of Outlet I under
the PUD concept called for development of 156 housing units
achieved via construction of 43 quad -home structures and 14
duplexes. Under the PUD concept, the utilities plan for
Outlet I, including parka, walkways, streets, etc., was
Integrated with utilities planning for the balance of the
Meadow Oaks development area. Briar Oakes Estate proposes
ultimate development of 60 housing units which will result in
less than 1/2 the original density.
Although some changes have boon made to the original plan for
street circulation, the Briar Oakes Estate preliminary plat
appears to be designed to fit well into the adjoining PUD
area. The major change to the original plan is the
elimination of street access to Meadow Oaks via Meadow Lane.
This change was requested to improve the ability of the
developer to market the Briar Oakes Estate to second- and
third -time home buyers. Offsetting this change is the
proposal to develop a roadway connecting to future development
at Outlets C and D, thereby providing two ways in and out of
the development. As noted in the previous agenda item, all
other aspects of the Briar Oakes plat are consistent with the
original PUD concept, including trail development, storm water
management, and sewor/wator system development.
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
The City of Monticello has a very short supply of lots
available for people interested in building their second or
third home. Rezoning of this area to R-1 will allow
development of lots for "move -up" housing. This factor
further justifies the rezoning request.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve rezoning of Outlot I from PUD to R-1
zoning designation.
Motion is based on the finding that the rezoning is
justified for the following reasons: The Briar Oakes
subdivision is designed to sufficiently integrate with
the adjoining PUD areas; the rezoning is consistent #ith
the comprehensive plan, geography and the character of
the area; the rezoning will allow development of "move -
up" single family building lots which are in short supply
at this time. Rezoning is contingent on approval of the
final plat of the Briar Oakes Estate.
If the City Council approved the preliminary plat and if
the City Council agrees with the finding above, then this
alternative should be selected.
2. Motion to deny rezoning of Outlot I from PUD to R-1
zoning designation.
If the City Council did not approve the preliminary plat
and if the Council does not agree with the finding undor
alternative Al above, then this alternative should be
selected.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative 01.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Proposed rezoning map.
10
12 ..
1 B3
~ R i
AO , AO
--------- -
F1
PROPOSED
----- -
PROPOSED `^!
- -j REZONING ` '
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
8. Public Hearinq--Cons ideratIon of resolution approving plans
and authorizinq,advertisement for bids ---Briar Oakes Estate,
Proiect 91-2. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you recall, at the previous meeting City Council authorized
preparation of plans and opacifications subject to the
developer providing the cash necessary to complete plans and
specifications and subject to the developer providing cash
equal to the cost to complete the bidding process. The
purpose of the deposit was to provide the City with funds
necessary to pay for plan development in the event that the
project does not proceed. In response to Council action, the
developer submitted $17,000; whereupon, the City Engineer
moved forward to prepare plans and specifications.
As of the writing of this memo, the plans and specifications
are not entirely completed; however, they should be completed
in sufficient form for review at the Council meeting. As was
noted in the previous agenda item, the major issues associated
with the final plat have been resolved and the viability of
the project, at this time, appears secure.
An issue relating to storm sewer development, was not
addressed at the previous meeting during the review of the
feasibility study. After taking a closer look at the storm
sewer system proposed under the feasibility study, it became
apparent that properties outside of the Briar Oakes Estate
area will benefit from a portion of the storm sewer system
developed with phase I of Briar Oakes. Specifically, a storm
sewer pipe will be installed to connect the S.E. pond to the
east pond at a cost of $13,500. Properties that benefit from
this improvement include Outlets J, L, and M, owned by Farm
Credit, and property located in the township.
PROPOSED METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTING STORM SEWER COSTS
City staff has developed a tentative formula for distributing
the costs associated with the "shared" portion of phase I
storm sower improvements. The formula calculates each
property's share of the $13,500 cost based on the amount of
water that each property contributes to the System. Following
Is the proposed distribution of costa:
m
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
STORM SEWER CONNECTING
BRIAR OAKES
SE POND TO EAST POND
TOTAL COST OF
STORM SEWER: $13,500
`W\
Percent
Of Total
Proposed
C
Properties/Owner
Water
Assessment
Prestige Builders
248
$ 3,240
Township Property
588
E 7,830
),LF'
K�PI�I
Outlot J/Farm Credit
68
$ 810
e^
Outlot L/Farm Credit
98
$ 1,215
Outlot M/Farm Credit
3%
$ 405
TOTAL
$13,500
Please note that 588 of the water contributed to this system
comes from the township. If one applies this percentage to
the total cost, the township share equals $7,830. Since the
City cannot assess the township property for this improvement,
It is suggested that this portion of the cost be paid by the
City.
As an additional note, the Briar Oakes Estate ponds will be
sized to handle water from areas outside of the Briar Oakes
Estate plat. No other land owners or the City will be paying
for any of the costs associated with development of ponds that
are larger than needed by the development itself.
PHASE II STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Following is additional information for future reference with
regards to the storm sewer Improvements that will be necessary
with phase II improvements. It appears that phase II storm
sewer improvements will benefit a larger area, which includes
existing residential properties and undeveloped properties
owned by Dickman Knutson.
DICKMAN KNUTSON
According to John Simola, an arrangement was made between
Knutson and the City that allowed Knutson to develop a portion
of the Meadow Oak 4th Addition without complete Installation
of storm sower ponds necessary to handle water from the Meadow
Oak 4th Addition. The City allowed the development to occur
without completion of storm sewer facilities because it was
anticipated that completion of the storm sewer ponds would
occur at a later date and timed to coincide with the
completion of the development of the Meadow Oak 4th Addition.
It Is now evident that the storm Bower system needed with the
4th Addition must be installed as part of phase II of the
Briar Oakes Estate development.
12
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
MEADOW OAK 4TH ADDITION PROPERTY OWNERS
A portion of the phase II storm sewer improvement will manage
water coming from developed residential properties in the
Meadow Oak 4th Addition. This is not an issue at this time
since Council is currently considering phase I storm sewer
improvements only. Please note, however, that homeowners in
the area were sent a public hearing notice regarding phase I
improvements. This was done prematurely because staff was not
sure which areas would benefit from phase I two weeks ago when
the notices had to be sent.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve a resolution accepting plans and
authorizing advertisement for bids for Briar Oakes
Estate, Project 91-2.
Under this alternative, Council is comfortable with the
fact that sufficient funds are available to finance the
bid process; therefore, the City has nothing to lose by
moving forward with this project. Under this
alternative, the next step would be to complete the
bidding process and consider awarding the bids at the
July 22 meeting of the Council.
2. Motion to deny or table approving a resolution approving
plans and authorizing advertisement for bids for Briar
Oakes Estate, Project 91-2.
Under this alternative, the project would be delayed at
least three weeks, which would severely limit the ability
of the developer to complete model home construction in
time for the fall marketing and in time for the parade of
homes event.
If the final plat and development agreement are not
approved, Council could take the position that the
bidding process should not occur until all agreements are
in place.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Again, the developer has deposited funds necessary to cover
all costs, and he is interested in seeing the project move
forward as quickly as possible. He has assumed all risks
associated with the potential of the project failing come
July 22, 1991. If the resolution approving plans and
specifications and ordering advertisement for bids is not
approved at this time and advertising does not occur, the time
schedule for this project will be thrown off at least three
weeks, which would severely hamper the ability of the
developer to put homes on the market this fall.
13
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
No formal action needs to be taken with regards to the
proposed assessment roll associated with the $13,500 storm
sewer improvement. Please note, however, that the development
agreement with Prestige Builders only calls for Prestige
paying 24% of this improvement. Therafore the remaining 76%
must be financed by other sources. This aspect of the project
will be formally addressed at the assessment hearing.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution approving plans and authorizing
advertisement for bids for Briar Oakes Estate, Project 91-2;
Map showing position of $13,500 storm sewer improvement.
RESOLUTION 91 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT 91-2
BRIAR OAKES ESTATE PHASE I
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on June 10,
1991, and;
WHEREAS, Prestige Builders has deposited funds with the City
($17,000) equal to the cost to prepare plans and specifications and
sufficient to also fund the cost to conduct the bidding process.
The City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications associated
with installation of sanitary sewer extensions, water main
extensions, bituminous paving, curb and gutter, and storm sewer
improvements and appurtenant work and has presented such plans and
specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted
In the otticiai paper and in the Coustructlon Bulletin an
advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement
under such approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall be published fordays, shall specify
the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by
the City Administrator until 10:00 AM on July 17, 1991, at
which time they will be publicly opened in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and City
Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by
the Council at 7:00 PM on July 22, 1991, in the Monticello
City Hall Council Chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility
Is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an
opportunity to address the Council on the issue of
responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,
cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the
City for 59 of the amount of such bid.
Adopted this 24th day of Juno, 1991.
Mayor
City Administrator
PRELIMINARY PLA! BRIAR OAKES ESTATE
City OF M011110ELL0. VAUGiit COUtiiY, U11111E6018
60 RMUENUAL IM II!
.�. ....... FAST POND
F •• � .i? „�p4{:�i!' JYa 'i\y}���.IN'?4 ���w ��: dt-i%X,t:ii�"' STORM
•ti r� .�;1: Y �r...;�; SEWER
! 1lnr.l Iln • \F�' !J' �7/ � A '�i � ' , �»Itl e_..'4 •-,. .
\ I. .tYI. I.MII t..IM,/.1 \� •�• �?!� .K �, i;.•�Y'^,"� �.. � I10 i`� ,.
ll 1 • '• 1•nY.l,., } _ ria � �; ` p / f1
IIOt.l1Y I.Ipp,Y! 111\ IMM.IM NN ` �, i w..i? ". A 1
wpl.Ylw ��1l ll.rl 1....1 .. �� •;Vt4L ��� n �•� IL
):E ND
E
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
9. Public Hearing --Consideration of a resolution approvinq plans
and authorizinq advertisement for bide --Fallon Avenue and
Cardinal Hills improvement projects 91-1 and 91-3. (J.O.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As with the previous agenda item, the City Council authorized
development of plans and specifications subject to the
developer providing the City with a letter of credit in an
amount equal to the cost to prepare plans and specifications.
The City Engineer has completed the plans and specifications
associated with the Fallon Avenue improvement and phase I of
the Cardinal Hills improvement, and Council is asked to
consider approving plans and authorizing advertisement for
bids.
Similar to the previous agenda item, the development agreement
is not In place, and the preliminary and final plats have yet
to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The developer,
however, is very concerned about getting homes started in
1991. He has a number of buyers waiting and ready to go and
is very motivated to move forward with this project.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to approve a resolution approving plans and
authorizing advortisemont for bids for Fallon Avenue and
Cardinal Hills improvements.
Selection of this alternative would be consistent with
Council's previous action to authorize developmont of
plans and specifications. Under this alternative,
Council is comfortable that the developer is committed to
preparing a preliminary and final plat that meets all
ordinance requirements, and Council is comfortable with
the fact that the City is not at risk financially if we
move ahead on this project.
Under this alternative, the next step will be to provide
the Planning Commission with the preliminary and final
plat for roviow, at the July 9 meeting of the Planning
Commission. In addition, the Planning Commission will be
considering rezoning the property from agricultural to
residential uses. In the next two weeks, City staff will
be working with the developer toward completion of a
dovolopmont agroomeat. Ultimately, consideration of
approval of the development agreement, approval of
preliminary and final plat, and the bid award are
scheduled to coincide on July 22, 1991.
I
C
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
2. Motion to deny approval of a resolution approving plans
and authorizing advertisement for bids for Fallon Avenue
and Cardinal Hills improvement projects 91-1 and 91-3.
Under this alternative, Council could take the position
that the City is moving too fast and that final and
preliminary plat approval should be completed prior to
approval of plans and specifications. This alternative
would not be consistent with the previous action on this
matter and might be unreasonable given the fact that the
developer has provided funds aufficient to cover the cost
associated with moving forward on development of plans
and specifications.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative O1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proposed resolution; Copy of Cardinal Hills plat.
16
RESOLUTION 91 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
FOR PROJECTS 91-1 (FALLON AVENUE)
AND 91-3 (CARDINAL HILLS PHASE I)
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the cuncil on June 10,
1991, and;
WHEREAS, the developer, Value Plus Homes, has deposited with the
City a letter of credit in the amount of $11,000, which is equal to
the cost to prepare plans and specifications and sufficient to also
fund the cost to conduct the bidding process.
The City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications associated
with installation of sanitary sewer extensions, water main
extensions, bituminous paving, curb and gutter, and storm sewer
improvements and appurtenant work and has presented such plans and
specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted
In the official paper and In the Construction Bulletin an
advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement
under such approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall be published fordays, shall specify
the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by
the City Administrator until 10:00 AM on July 17, 1991, at
which time they will be publicly opened In the Council
Chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and City
Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by
the Council at 7:00 PM on July 22, 1991, in the Monticello
City Hall Council Chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility
is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an
opportunity to address the Council on the issue of
responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,
cashier's chock, bid bond, or certified chock payable to the
City for 59 of the amount of such bid.
Adopted this 24th day of Juno, 1991.
Mayor
City Administrator
m
PR£G
yrtRY prAT A°' J.RpapSED
CA
Rp1NAL HILLS
c1re a,
yrr',norivlerW'
0
I
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
�o. Consideration of accepting the 1991 Audit Report for the Citv
of Monticello. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Mr. Rick Borden and/or Kim Lillehaug of Gruys Johnson S
Associates will be present at the meeting to present a brief
overview of the 1990 Audit Report recently completed.
A copy of the report was previously delivered to each Council
member for your review. I realize an 80 -page document of this
type is hard to review and analyze, but the report should be
accepted by the Council prior to the end of June, as it is to
be submitted to the state auditor by June 30, 1991. After the
presentation of the report by Gruys Johnson representatives,
if the Council feels that it would like additional time to
review the report, this item can again be scheduled at a
future Council meeting for further review, etc.
Should you have any specific questions regarding the
information presented in the audit report, you may contact
myself prior to Monday night's meeting, and I will try to
answer any questions you may have.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
The only action necessary by the Council is to accept the 1990
Audit Report as presented so that it may be submitted to the
state auditor by the required June 30 deadline.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Previously delivered copy of 1990 audit.
17
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
t�• Consideration of the offer to exchange land in lieu of
delinquent assessments--Outlot A of Country Club Manor.
(R.W.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the previous Council meeting, the Council discussed the
offer by West Prairie Partners to exchange a 2-1/2 acre parcel
of property formerly known as the Baptist Church property for
Outlet A of Country Club Manor. As you may recall, the West
Prairie Partnership proposed to exchange their 2-1/2 acre
parcel for approximately 10 acres of Country Club Manor with
the City retaining approximately 6 acres of Outlot A for
future storm water needs. The rationale by the partnership
was that they felt the HRA and/or City may ultimately acquire
the Gills property and redevelop the entire area, including
the 2-1/2 acre parcel owned by the partnership.
Although the general consensus of the Council at the last
meeting was that a land exchange such as proposed may not be
beneficial to the City, the HRA was scheduled to meet June 12
to discuss the proposed land exchange. Basically, the HRA
also did not feel the acquisition of the 2-1/2 acre parcel
from the partnership would be that beneficial to the City and
questioned whether the exchange would adequately compensate
the City for the delinquent assessments owing on Outlet A. In
addition, they feel that the Gille property may ultimately
come to the City through tax forfeiture, and currently there
was no interest in actively seeking acquisition of the Gills
property nor the 2-1/2 acres from the West Prairie
Partnership.
The HRA did feel that the City should try and work with the
partnership in arriving at a settlement on the delinquent
taxes and assessments for Outlet A and suggested that the City
obtain an appraisal on Outlot A as a method for determining
its value. An appraisal is certainly an option the City could
take as a method to determine a realistic value for Outlet A.
As you may recall from the last meeting's agenda, since
Outlet A is currently zoned R-3 (multiple family, I checked
on some R-3 property that had boon for sale and also found out
what recent R-3 property has sold for. Apartment sites along
Lauring Lane near the Burger King establishment recently sold
for $39,000 per acre, and an adjacent parcel is currently
listed for $43,000 per acre. If the entire 16 -acre Outlot A
parcel was suitable for multiple housing development and there
woro developers interested in the property, the market value
could exceed $600,000 based on these values. while it may bo
a number of years before R-3 property is again in demand in
Monticello, it does appear that Outlet A could have a
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
substantial value in the future once the collector road
connecting this area to the 7th Street/Kmart area is
completed.
It is the opinion of the Public Works Department and the City
Engineer that if the City was to obtain property in Outlot A
for future storm ponding needs, the City could ultimately use
3-4 acres of property. This would leave at least 12 acres
that could be utilized for R-3 zoning. While I am only
guessing that the value today should be at least $25,000 per
acre or $300,000 for 12 acres, the Council may wish to obtain
an appraisal to more accurately establish a realistic value.
If the Council does not feel an appraisal is necessary at this
time, we can continue to work with our legal counsel and the
Wright County Auditor's office through the tax forfeiture
process in an attempt to obtain title to Outlot A for the
delinquent assessments, and the City could market the property
itself in the future to recapture our assessment cost.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The Council could still accept the proposed land swap as
settlement for delinquent assessments and taxes.
2. Based on the HRA's recommendation, Council could reject
the land exchange and order an appraisal for Outlat A in
an attempt to establish the value.
3. Council can reject the land exchange and wait for the tax
forfeiture proceedings to continue with ultimate
ownership of the property by the City.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
At this time, the staff does not believe a land exchange would
be that beneficial to the City. With the eventual completion
of the collector street, staff does feel the Outlet A property
will only increase in value and not decrease; and it is only
my guess that the property for multiple family zoning should
be worth $25,000 per acre when compared to recent sales and/or
listing prices. It may bo just as wail to lot the tax
forfeiture process continue, and the City could continue
working with the county auditor's office to obtain title
through this process. On the other hand, if we did obtain an
appraisal, we could use this value for attempting a settlement
on the delinquent assessments.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
19
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
12. Consideration of Cnamber request for office space. (O.K.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Chamber President, Bob Dawson, and Board Member, Mary Micke,
will be present at the meeting to present the Chamber's
request.
20
12. Consideration of Chamber Request for Office Space.
A couple of weeks ago the City Council was advised of the
Chamber's plans to hire a Chamber Director. The Chamber
subcommittee has researched several alternatives as potential
office space for the director. The Chamber's main location
criteria is visibility. Upon discussions between the Chamber
committee members Bob Dawson, Ron Hoglund, Linda Mielke, and
Ken Maus and City Staff members Rick Wolfsteller, John Simola,
Roger Mack, and Koropchak; the Chamber's recommendation for a
permanent home is the current Information/Museum area. The
recommendation for discussion creates a win/win situation for
both the city and the Chamber.
The City could resolve their dilemma of whether to upgrade the
information center on a temporary basis (budget $2,000) or to
demolish the current structures entirely. The Council could
consider a city site improvement of a new or remodeled
permanent structure designed to meet the needs of the Chamber
and could additionally serve as a year-round information
center. One thought being to utilize the present plumbing of
the bathroom facilities the city could elect to build -on an
addition from that point. Alternative design and costs need
to be researched. Ken Maus further suggested that an
alternative be considered for the Chamber of Commerce to lease
the structure at a minimum of $1,000-$2,000 the first year or
two and thereafter offer the an interest free loan over ten
years based on the improvement costs which would allow the
city to recover their investment cost. This would prevent any
potential controversy of whether taxpayers dollars should be
used to supplement a Chamber office and alleviate the city's
responsibility. The first two years minimum cost would allow
the Chamber time to adjust their budget through increase of
membership and fund raisers or through adjustment of
membership fees before assuming the interest free loan.
The benefit to the Chamber would be a permanent home with a
high visibility and sufficient parking with the newly erected
green parking signs and with the addition of the proposed
Wright County State Bank parking lot.
With the assumption the Chamber will have hired a director by
September 1, they would need temporary office space until the
site improvement costa were researched, decisions made, and
the construction completed (approximately 90 to 120 days). It
is suggested the temporary space be in the Council Chamber's
storage area which would serve as both a convenient location
and time for training period of the hired director with
Koropchak.
Chamber President Bob Dawson and Board Member Mary Micke will
4L
be at the Council meeting.
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
13. Consideration of options for varkinq lot expansion at City
Hall. (J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the last meeting, City staff distributed five concept plans
for parking lot expansion at City Hall. Based upon City
ordinances, we would require a similar facility to have 25
parking spaces plus one for each employee. This would be
approximately 36 spaces. The Deputy Registrar does its
biggest business on or about the 10th of the month, and it is
common for 15-20 people to be at City Hail at once obtaining
license plates. During this period of time, if anything else
is going on at City Hall, our actual needs may be closer to 40
spaces. The current parking lot contains 27 stalls and does
not conform to City ordinances in regard to width. It is
approximately 5 feet short. This is obvious when any larger
size vehicles try to back out of a parking space and turn to
leave the parking lot. In addition, we should have two
handicap spaces instead of one.
The five proposals Included have some different features, and
those features are summarized below.
Plan N1
This first plan expands the width of the existing parking lot
to a comfortable depth so vane and pickups can back out
easily. It also adds an additional handicapped space. The
total parking provided in this area is now 26 stalls (lose of
1). The first phase of the expansion consists of 24 Stalls
after the removal of the Cole house (total 50 stalls). It
includes continued use of the existing garage until phase II
is built adding another 11 stalls. This concept plan does
require some reworking of curbing in the southerly end of the
existing parking lot and allowo for two-way traffic to flow
throughout all parking areae.
Plan p2
The second plan loaves the existing parking lot pretty much as
It is except for a few minor curb changes and striping. This
parking lot becomes a one-way only with entrance off of Palm
Street and exit on Third Street. By placing the existing
parking at an angle and adding an additional handicapped ramp,
we end up with 21 stalls (loss of 6). Phase I of the addition
requires removal of the Cole house and adds another 25 stalls
(total 46 stalls). This option allows the continued use of
the garage until phase II, adding another 11 stalls, is built.
21
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
Plan #3
This plan removes the southerly curb from the existing parking
lot and expands the width of the parking lot to a comfortable
level. It adds another handicapped spot, and removal of the
small white rental house would add another 30 stalls, giving
us a total of 56 stalls. Two-way traffic is provided
throughout the parking area, and a nice green area is located
in the area around the power transformer.
Plan #4
This plan calls for one-way traffic throughout both parking
lots. The existing parking lot curbing on the south end is
removed, and traffic can flow through the parking lots or
travel through the loop on the westerly side. The traffic is
still one way, and this plan requires removal of the Cole
house. The plan is limited to 20 (loss of 7) stalls in the
existing parking lot and 24 stalls (total 44 stalls) in the
newly created parking lot.
Plan #5
Plan #5 pretty much leaves the existing parking lot alone with
exception that it will have one -wart traffic and the parking
spaces are angled. We lose about 6 stalls in the existing
parking lot. Traffic is one way through this parking lot but
enters into a two-way parking lot to the south where the white
house would be removed. This addition would add 30 more
stalls. Total spaces would be 51.
During a staff meeting at City Hall, several items were
discussed. one of the items was the possible confusion from
one-way parking lots. It was the consensus that if at all
possible, two-way entrances from the parking lots should be
provided. In addition, it was the consensus that the Cole
house should definitely be sold, removed, or demolished,
whether the parking area extends to that property or not.
There was some discussion that the white house be demolished
also, but the general consensus was that the building was in
fairly good shape needing only some roof repairs in the
immediate future. This building could possibly to be used as
interim expansion for City Hall or could continue to be
rented. If used as expansion for City Hall, with some minor
remodeling, it would make a good office for a Chamber of
Commerce officer and other uses. It was also the consensus
that most of the plans are feasible; but if one is to avoid
the one-wav traffic concept and save the small white house for
possible use by the City or continue renting it, concept
22
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
plan it appears to be most appropriate. And since these are
only concept plans, various modifications can be made to an
individual concept.
Should the City Council wish to remove both houses but still
wish to stay awav from cone -way oarkinq lots, concept plan 83
could be more appropriate. And lastly, should the Council
wish both houses gone and one-way parkinq lots are not a
problem, concept plan A5 could be more appropriate.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be for the Council to narrow
the field to two concept plans and have the City staff
prepare more detailed plans, including cost estimates.
2. The second alternative would be to select one concept for
further study, including coat estimates.
3. The third alternative would be to select a combination of
one or more concept plans and instruct staff to prepare
further information.
4. The fourth alternative would be to do nothing at this
time.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The consensus of staff wes that the City avoid one-way parkinq
lots and continue to make the little white house available for
rent or for temporary City use such as Chamber use. This
would limit the selection to concept plan N1 or a modification
thereof. Since there was some discussion that maybe both
houses should be removed, this recommendation is more by
consensus than a formal recommendation. Ultimately, the final
decision roats in the hands of the Council.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copies of the individual concept plane with additional notes.
23
N
BROADWAT
-J
NOTE
BLOCK D ORIGINAL PLAT
MONTICELLO. MIN,
F.
WE
BROADWAY
YY
IL
...........
m•
1'
J ---i
NOTE
wu, C.i.t,ty of vf"ckcE
a•a.� urn• e �
IBLOCK 0 ORIGINAL wcNmYt (t O. m". T
iron,
t�
r
BROADWAY
A
3" ST.
NOTE
u. CAPAC+a• a VCN.Clii
Nwr. ,, an'+man a
BLOCK 0ORIGNALw PIAT
MONTICC6LO. MN,
Ln
m
BROADWAY
J
o�
I
J
G
J
�e
.
a
NTE
Mu. C.►, CIT. Or v[I.ICIC S
BLOCK D ORIGWAL PLAT
/ MONTIC(LLO, MN,
4 y�j
BRDADWAT
t.� +
oil —
0
IL
NOTE
Y4. Li021Y pt Y[MICI[S
itt-r 0 1 Ji
Wi4 t��pi.IR tt t
' t' •.Yn Yui Y
IBLOCK O ORIGWAL PLAT
c MONTICELLO. MN,
ytt t•
J~ S1.
(5 o%S
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
14. Consideration of resolution supporting county adoption of
local sales tax option. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Minnesota State Legislators recently passed a new tax bill
for Minnesota which included a sales tax increase from 6% to
6.5% state wide. The additional 1/28 increase in the sales
tax is effective July 1, 1991, and will automatically expire
on December 31, 1991. For the period after December 31, 1991,
the law gives each county board the option of imposing a 1/28
local sales tax within each county. While the term "option"
is included in the law, in reality, each county and
municipality in the state stands to lose a lot of local
government aid and homestead credit aid if they do not
increase the sales tax by 1/28 next year.
For the local option sales tax to take effect after
Deccmber 31, 1991, each county board must decide to impose the
tax. If a county does not impose the local option sales tax,
the county and all cities within the county will lose any
state aid they were previously scheduled to receive. While
the county board could decide not to increase the sales tax
for Wright County residences, the county and the cities would
lose much more in state aid than they would save from not
increasing the sales tax.
In 1990, the City of Monticello received no state aid of any
kind, including homestead credit reimbursements. For 1991, to
our surprise, the City of Monticello will receive
approximately $242,000 in homestead credit reimbursements; and
as such, the City of Monticello again could stand to lose this
type of aid if Wright County does not opt for the sales tax
Increase. Unless the State Department of Revenue completely
changes its formula for distribution of homestead credit for
Monticello, it appears that the City Council should also
support the increase in the sales tax for 1992. It should be
noted that any decision of the county board regarding the
optional sales tax can be reversed by city councils and town
boards of cities and towns whose population make up a majority
of the county's population by adopting resolutions rescinding
the tax increase. This Se also the case if the county votes
not to increase the tax, the majority of the population can
vote to increase the sales tax to avoid losing state aid.
The reason adoption of a local sales tax increase appears so
favorable and rejection appears so unfavorable is that the now
law provides for each county that adopts the tax increase to
not only sharo In the 1/2 cent sales tax increase but also
receives state aide based on the revenue raised from 2 cents
of the original 6% sales tax. If the county does not opt for
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
the additional 1/2 cent sales tax increase, the residents only
save the equivalent of 1/2 cent, and our share of the 2 cents
of the existing sales tax will be distributed to other
counties within the state. Thus, the state-wide average
benefit ratio of adopting the tax is almost 4 to 1.
The county board will be making a decision on the sales tax
increase June 25, as they must notify the Department of
Revenue by July 15 whether or not they intend to impose the
additional sales tax. They are asking for each township and
city's input on the matter before they make a decision. if
the City of Monticello is supportive of the additional sales
tax increase, they are requesting a resolution be adopted
supporting the sales tax option.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Adopt the resolution supporting a county decision to
Increase the sales tax for Wright County from 68 to 6.58
In order for all cities and townships In Wright County to
continue receiving state aids.
2. Do not adopt the resolution or adopt a resolution urging
the county not to adopt the aptional sales tax increase.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
If this law would have been passed last year, the City of
Monticello was not receiving any kind of state aid and,
therefore, Monticello should have selfishly requested the
sales tax increase not take place. With the current state
revenue department formula, the City is now again receiving
state aid for homestead credit, and the City of Monticello
would lose more In aid than it would ever gain by not
increasing the sales tax. As a result, it appears that it
will also be In the City of Monticello's benefit to urge the
county to increase the sales tax by 1/28. I am confident that
all other cities and townships in Wright County will
definitely support the sales tax increase, as revenue
shortfalls will far exceed any savings in sales tax if they
don't.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proposed resolution; Letter from Wright County.
E,
RESOLUTION 91 -
RESOLUTION URGING ADOPTION OF ONE-HALF PERCENT
LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX
WHEREAS, the adoption of the 1/2 percent local option sales tax by
Wright County would maintain aids to the county and the cities and
townships within the county, and
WHEREAS, failure of Wright County to adopt the local option sales
tax would result in the loss of all county, city, and township aids
within the county, amounting to an aid loss of about 5.6 times as
much as the county revenues from the 1/2 percent sales tax, and
WHEREAS, the failure of Wright County to adopt the tax would result
In the aids currently being received hf the local governments in
Wright County instead of being re -distributed as a windfall to the
counties which adopt the tax, and
WHEREAS, failure to adopt the tax would greatly increase property
taxes in Wright County.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Monticello City Council urges
the Wright County Board of Commissioners to adopt the 1/2 percent
local option sales tax prior to the July 1 deadline for such
adoption.
Adopted this 24th day of June, 1991.
Mayor
City Administrator
OJNT Y ��
v 32
67
.4Y
7e6s
RICHARD W. NORMAN
County Coordinator
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
10 N. W. 2nd Street
Buffalo. Minnesota 55313
Tel: (612) 682-7378
Afetro: (612) 339.6881
1-800.362.3667
TO: ALL CITIES 6 TOWNSHIPS
June 6, 1991
WES WITTKOWSKI. Vice Chao
Fin, D, ci
PAT SA N'A TZKE
S, -.d Di.rrirt
MICHELLE BOCENRIEF. Chairjo ra
Third Du —,
ARL YN NELSON
Fourth D.—
O.J. ARLIEN
Fihh D.—
As you're well aware, each County Board in the State of
Minnesota has to decide by July 1, 1991, whether or not to impose
the Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) provided by the 1991 State
Legislature. Once a County Board has decided to impose the tax,
it remains in effect until it acts to rescind the tax ---unless
cities and towns or voters take action to rescind the tax.
Revenue from the local option sales tax would be deposited
in a new trust account dedicated to the payment of state aid ---
the local government trust fund. In addition, the lav provides
for the depositing of 25 percent of the revenue raised from the
six percent state sales tax rate into the fund.
If a county decides not to impose the local option sales
tax for any year, the city. town, county, and special taxing dist-
rict governments within the county will not receive payment of
state aids in the following year. Based on 1990 aid payments,
the cities, towns, and county stand to lose $7.7 million.
The County Board feels that there is really little option
available when faced with this level of reduced funding from the
State with no corresponding reduction in mandates. However, be-
fore considering a resolution, the Board wishes to have input
from other tax jurisdictions in the County. Therefore, they
respectfully request that your jurisdiction consider a similar
resolution and pass the voting results on to the County Board
by June 25, 1991. I have enclosed a resolution passed by the
City of Albertville that you may wish to use as a snmple resolution.
The County Board will consider the Local Option Sales Tax
at 11:00 A.M., Tuesday, June 25, 1991. You are welcome to partic-
ipate in the discussion of this issue.
Sincerely. L
W_
Riichord W. Nor
County Coordinator
RWN/mr
Encl: O
Eq -1 Opportunity / A((i—ot,u Action Emp4ryer
t
Comparison of aids lost if 1/2 percent sales tax
not adopted versus sales tax savings
^IaY 31,1991 Pefefed on ee1-yr4dpw, Page 3C
1991 S
1991 8
per eP
per Call.
1991 city,
from
Ratio of
1991 city,
from
Ratio of
county,
V2%
aid to
county,
In%
aid to
tosro aid
asks tan
IAI%
to -n aW
asks to
V2%
County name
per cW
In county
sale tar
Couaty tame
per cap.
in county
Saks tax
Aitkin
106.01
20.22
5.2
Martin
213.22
21.44
9.9
Anoka
117.16
2736
3.0
Mcleod
201.89
26.36
7.6
Beck"
93,00
20.97
0.4
Meeker
158.08
17.03
9.3
Beltrami
81.14
25.60
3.2
Mille Lues
110.60
22.25
5.0
Benton
89.86
18.63
4.8
Morrison
146.08
15.08
9.7
Big Stone
326.68
18.01
18.1
Mowll
249.62
20.28
12.3
Blue Firth
192.92
36.05
3.3
Murry
225.91
13.89
16.3
Brown
234.80
2639
8.8
Nicollct
197.91
13.62
14.5
Carlton
209.60
18.16
11.3
Nobles
230.18
33.40
6.9
Cana
114.49
19.79
3.8
Norman
235.72
16.60
14.2
Can
58.47
18.61
3.1
Olmsted
152.70
39.38
3.9
CTippew
237.03
23.13
10.2
Ottertail
146.63
27.13
5A
Cldsago
13339
14.19
9.4
Pennington
217.47
29.92
7.3
Clay
165.44
18.08
9.2
Pine
95.45
15.71
6.1
Cleamter
100.72
15.33
6.6
Pipestone
223.9
19.53
11.5
Cook
145.69
49.01
3.0
Polk
218.37
18.86
11.6
Cottoo-ood
247.96
17.63
14.1
Pope
168.27
14.27
11.6
Co. Wing
108.72
3950
2.8
Ramsey
201.42
42.81
4.7
Dakota
101.05
28.36
3.6
Red lake
270.19
13.87
17.0
Dodge
234.85
16.84
13.9
Redwood
233.66
20.40
11.5
Douglas
135.76
28.73
4.7
Renville
209.70
13.86
15.1
Faribsult
2.38.50
20.05
11.9
Rice
169.84
19.59
8.7
Fllmme
240.18
17.93
13.4
Rock
211.44
15.40
13.7
Frtcbmn
220.99
2800
7.9
Roseau
109.33
20.43
5.4
Owdhue
117.47
21.58
5.4
Scott
123.72
28,14
4,4
Grant
214.48
15.89
135
Sherburne
62.52
13.62
4.6
lknnepin
146.39
61.22
2.4
Sibley
224.76
9.32
24,1
Houston
206.17
10.03
20.6
Steams
168.36
33.41
5.0
Hubbard
69,57
21.96
3.2
Steele
196.62
27.90
7.0
fund
126.38
18.42
6.9
Sarcns
239.96
23.41
10.3
Itarra
162.88
29.20
5.6
St.lnuis
301.57
28.68
10.5
Jackson
233.89
15.85
16.0
S-ift
253.62
16.79
15.1
Krnbee
13832
17.14
8.1
Todd
172.41
10.32
:6.7
R+ndiyohi
151.18
29.97
5.0
Terme
296,14
14,66
20.2
Cason
201.95
15.05
13.4
Wabasha
176.33
15.68
11.2
Roochlehing
205,28
)1.9)
6.4
Wades
135.10
26.01
5.2
Lac Qui P.L.
239.44
24.15
9.9
Warta
206.41
19.30
10.7
IAks
We of the woods
266.82
26.74
10.0
Washington
96.45
20,40
4.7
LaSueur
149.32
2060,
73
wetonw7n
212.48
18.59
11.4
Lincoln
183.91
16,64
11.1
Wilkin
279.33
13.19
21.2
246.301)36
18A
j C
�tlawame
a=02,4
Mahtromen
wrsloll
196,73
1771
loo
103.
. 1-
17.8
170.24
10.90
15.6
^IaY 31,1991 Pefefed on ee1-yr4dpw, Page 3C
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
15. Consideration of speed study for Chelsea Road and approval of
the county posting the paved shoulders on County Road 117 near
Highway 25 with "no parking." (J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the request of Jenny Hoglund from Hoglund Transportation,
the county has looked into consistency of speed zones on
County Road 117, Chelsea Road, and County Road 118. Also at
Jenny's request, the county looked at parking problems along
County Road 117 and right -shoulder passing along the same
road. Dave Montebello, the Assistant County Engineer,
responded to Jenny Hoglund through the City of Monticello. A
copy of this response is enclosed for your review.
Mr. Montebello has suggested that we contact the Commissioner
of Transportation's office to determine the correct speed zone
on Chelsea Road. The City Public Works Department posted this
road at 30 mph some years ago due to concerns with the fast
traffic in the area. More than likely, the Commissioner of
Highways would determine that the speed limit should be above
30 mph, especially in that area of Chelsea east of Fallon to
County Road 118.
Mr. Montebello concurs with Jenny Hoglund's recommendation
that parking be prohibited on the paved shoulders on County
Road 117 near the areae of Highway 25. Prior to placing those
no parking signs, Wright County would like concurrence from
' the City Council.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
�11. The first alternative would be to request that the
�'�� Commissioner of Highways study the area known as Chelsea
aVF, Road from County Road 117 to 118 and determine the proper
speed zone. This alternate would also include the
concurrence with Wright County for placing no parking
�. signs on County Road 117 near Highway 25.
The second alternative would be not to request the speed
study or concur with Wright County as to the placement of
no parking signs on County Road 117.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the rocommondation of the Public Works Director that the
City Council authorize us to request a speed study and allow
the County to poet no parking on County Road 117 as outlined
in alternative I1.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of letter from Dave Montebello to the City of Monticello.
26
WRIGHT COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
Wright County Public Works Building
Route No. 1 - Bos 97-B
Buffalo, Minnesota 55313
Jet. T.N. 25 and C.R. 138
Telephone (612) 682-7383
May 28, 1991
John Simola
Public WOrkB Director
City of Mon tiCal 10
250 E. Broadway
P.O. Bos 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Traffic Concerns CR 117 Monticello
Dear John:
WAYNE A. PINGA160N, P.E.
Hl`h..y Engima
682.7988
DAVID R. MONTEBEILO. P.E.
AnIsnm High—y Ensi w
682.7987
RICHARD E. MARQUE1TE
Right d W.y Agmt
682.7388
The purpose of this letter is to make you aware of a number of
traffic concerns that were expressed to me by Jenny Hoglund. They
relate to the segment of CR 117 between Chelsea Lane and T.H. 25.
Theme concerns are as follows:
(1) Speed:
CR 117 has a posted speed limit in this area of 35 MPH.
Jenny has indicated to me that she feel@ that the majority of
vehicles are traveling ouch faster. I have requested that the
Sheriffs Office do ■ speed check in this area to determine the
actual vehicle speed*. In addition, to this Jenny mentioned
that she feels that the speed limit should be lowered to 30
MPH. She compared this area to Chelsea Lane which is posted
at 30 MPH and has no aide *treat traffic between the
Industrial Park and CR 118. I indicated to her that this area
to my knowledge was not posted with an authorized speed limit.
I believe that motorists are not respecting these signs in
this area and the City should consider properly zoning Chelsea
Lan* so that we have some consistency between our street
systems.
The area of CR 117 between Chelsea Lane and TH 25 is
close to meeting the standards of what is termed an "urban
district". This would allow for ■ reduction to 30 MPH if the
County determined that it would be an enforceable limit.
0
(2) Parking:
Currently there are no prohibitive parking signs along CR
117. Jenny Hoglund indicated that many times large trucks
park along the street in front of Tom Thumb or McDonalds while
they run in and make purchases. This restricts eight distance
to those who use the entrances. Both facilities have the
space to accommodate these trucks with off-street parking.
The County is recommending that no parking signs be
placed along these areas to prohibit parking at all times.
The County likes to have City concurrence on all parking
restrictions which affect businesses etc. within the City. We
request that you discuss this issue and forward to us your
recommendations.
(3) No Passing on Shoulder:
Jenny Hoglund also mentioned that passing on the right or
going around vehicles that are making left turns is a problem.
This has become a common maneuver for most motorists and one
can frequently see this occurring at every intersection. This
maneuver is not what I would term dangerous if done properly
but many motorists do not take adequate care when making this
maneuver. The Sheriffs Office has indicated that they do not
actively pursue or cite motorists for these actions unless
they are passing moving traffic on the right and are reckless
in their actions. We will be discussing this further in-house
before we commit to making additional signing changes.
If you have question• concerning this please contact so.
Sincerely,
Dave Montebello, P.E.
Assistant County Engineer
Enclosures Sign Inventory Listing
pe: Wayne Pingalson, Co. Engr.
Jenny Hoglund
Pat Sawatake, County Cossissioner
Bill Cordell, Traffic Tech
DM/jas
0
••• SIGN INVENTORY F i ! LISTING •••
ROAD 117 FROM 1.677 TO 3. MO -
SIGN
DIR BIDE MILEPOINT SIDE DESCRIPTION
3. eso
3. ew
R_FSON. PRO
DETAIL ONLY
BION
DIR ROAD DIG
N
N
N
fi
N
- -`
i
3. e70
DD(
• TRIHIGHWAY e7 •
�l
3. e70
SIGNAL LIGHTS
.kE •
C.
3. e31
C
H
8
3.831
r•
-
3.3Q066,
• MCDONALDS ENTRANCE
-
3.806
STOP
•
L
3. 197
L
S
3.195
C'
'f
3.1700
• AMACO GAS STATION ENT •
3.170
STOP
3.160 1
• HOOLUND BUB ENTRANCE •
3. 60
8700.
m 3.1 57
a3.
177
N
3. 118
3.103
SIGNAL AHEAD
3.081
• CITY STREET •
3.091
STOP
d£ •
6, 3.070
,
8
3.078
LB •
3.077
8
3.077
3. DES
• COMFORT INN ENTRANCE •
3.018
SPEED LIMIT 37
&_8.960_
• OANNOOD ORM•
8.960
STOP
,ITEI
N
e.976
8.976
• CHELSEA ROAD •
8.976
STOP
N
8. 673
N
e.873
8.873
SPEED LIMIT 37
e.8e0
CURVE LEFT
8.00
ADV. SPEED PLATE 37 MPH
8
8.774
8.706
Y
8.
• DUNDAD ROAD •
8.
STOP
8. 3
DEOIN
@. 3
SPEED LIMIT 37
@.6 3
1/6 MILE
M
I. 7
1. u 7
• 87TH DIREST •
1.617
STOP
ORD- 117
DISTRICT-
8 TRAVE. DIRECTION-
NORTHBOUND
N
N
N
fi
N
- -`
i
N 117 a NEBTSOUND
�l
TRAVEL
•
DIR '•
C.
8
C
H
l
H
r•
C
H
B
8
L
H
i
N 117 a NEBTSOUND
E
i
8
H
l
H
H
B
8
L
B
L
c
C'
'f
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
16. Consideration of final payment for Proiect 90-04, utility
improvements and appurtenant work for Sandberq East. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The restoration work on the Sandberg East project is now
complete. Annandale Contracting, Inc., of Annandale,
Minnesota, is in the process of finishing up the last few
minor punch list items. The City's inspector, Tom Bose; Bret
Weiss, the project engineer from OSM; and the contractor have
all agreed on the final quantities. The contract as bid was
$167,986. We added change order #1, which was an additional
dewatering cost at the start of the project, for $2,250,
bringing the total estimated contract cost to $170,236.
The final quantities with extensions at unit prices show total
value of the work completed of $173,051.79. The primary
difference between this figure and the previous figure is due
to a change in the utility configuration for Sandberg East
after the project was bid. The change was made at the requoct
of John Sandberg, as the pians were developed to serve his new
plat with additional lots on Glllard. Mr. Sandberg requested
that we change the service connections to go back to the
existing plat, which was done.
To date, the contractor has been paid $157,008.30, leaving a
balance duo of $16,043.49.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to make final payment to
Annandale Contracting, Inc., of Annandale, Minnesota, in
the amount of $16,043.49.
2. The second alternative is not to make final payment to
Annandale Contracting or to make final payment at a
different amount. This does not appear to be applicable,
as Annandale Contracting, Inc., has completed the work,
and the City Engineer and City Inspector are satisfied
with that work.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the staff recommendation that the City of Monticollo
authorize final payment to Annandale Contracting, Inc., for
Project 90-04 in the amount of $16,043.49.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of final payment request; Copy of latter from OSM.
27
JUN 19 '91 16'18 OSM MFIS. III
June 16, 1991
Or. Aict Nolfsteller
City of Ilonlicello
250 lest BrodduY St.
flonlicelIn. Minnesota 55362
P.2
O.SVL- =or -
2011 lift Htnnrpin Ave7Wt
MIMIraPOU MN f611 J
61!•J!1.86a0
fAN�,aI•Jd116 EnRIWA
Surveyors
Planner{
Re : UIlLI1Y IRPROVEnENTR AND APPURTENANT NBRt
+
1011111 1111, 110 A06111111
CIIY PROJECI NO. %-o1
05A [aa. No. 1557.70
1, City Council
i
rt
Enclosed sera four (U Copies of Construction Payment Voucher No. 3 1 final an the reference, project In the uoust of
1 11,011.19.
Pursuant to our profetsicnal optagom based upon absarretion, testing, analysis and other uepllnq techniques
■e performed, the construction was completed to accordance alth the plans and specifications.
Upon rececot of affidavit, State of Acnnotots Pore It -111, ane also Reteiot and Waiver at Lata Rights from
Annandale Contracting, log., please cele payment to Annanoale Contracting, Inc., Rwle I, lot 19, AMandile, An. 55507
ti at your earliest toavemience.
-1
Very truly ywrl,
094-SCKLEN AAYCRON
I ASSBCIA'Es, INC.
i list deiss,►.E.
t PrUul Engineer
T
SAM A11
Eaclstllres I
to a Annandale Ceatraellq, lot.
-p —
I." lMu mN.6, N Oven,
,JUti 19 '91 16: 19 MSM PPLS, llti
P. 3
Estiull Voucher No. 3 6 final CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT VOUCHER
Oats June 16, 1991 for Period fading May 31 1991
_.....---------..•___..—_..--•••- ---------•-^--------^—
Project No. . 90.01
...._•---..--..--.-----------------------.-•.---••--'--_—.•--•-.•--.—-.--._.-
NAN—^
Class o1 Nark t UTILITY MOMENTS AND APPI@IET WORN
'•..
To t Annandale Contracting, Inc.
................................................... Route 1, Sm 19
Location t SONBBER6 EAST 21D ADDITION Anaiadale, An. 55302
---------- ----......... ... ............... ..- ....•••
For t CIt1 OF NONTICELLO, WRIGHT CMMTI, HINNESOTA
---------------
- —•----------------•--•---•--------
A. Original Contract Asount 6 167,986.00
-----------------
...--..
s. Total Additions / 2,250.00 C.O. No. I
-------------------- —
C. Total Deductions 1 0.00
0. Total Funds Encubered 6 170,236.00
.......................
E. Total Value of Work Certified to Date / 171,051.79
.................«..--
F. Less Retained Percentage i 1 0.00
............ ......... ..............
6. Less total Previous Payments 6 151,006.30
N. Total Paysnts Including This Voucher 1 173,051.79
.....................
1. Balance Carried forward •7,015.19
J. A P P 2 0 V E I FOR PAY HEN I, IHIS V000NEA 6 16,013.19
.............
APPROVALS
......_..............
us.rasva.u......aa.... aaean....m.c.:I.a.a......... :: s.anu..uaa^.::...nr..... stc c:.aaua.a........
01114CNELCN•NAVERON i ASSOCIATES, INC.
Pursuant to our field observation, as performed in atcorlance with aur contract, and based on our professional opialob,
saloials are satisfactory add the moil properly perlorsed in accordance with the plus and spmnliulions and that the
total work is 100 1 completed As of My 31, 1991 . we hereby r caudad 04) gait 01 this varcher.
«_.. ........,—.............. f/1/I IYVII
Billed t Signed r ,
Camslrvttioe Observer
........................................... •.................................................................«..._..
This is to certify that to the best it ey knowledge, 106rull06, and 611,91, the suantitin and values of work
certified lurUn is a lilt epprotieste estimate for the period [6,6111 by this voucher.
C6etratter i Annandale Contracting, Int. Biped IV
...._....^. ................ -_..........-_.•.................................
site r fills
uu....aa wuuw.nn..aunu... ..me mwa ......... I.aa.aa.tu.....-0..... . ..a.w.......nmanuuwn
City el Met to Approved lot paystat
'author .....—........................... .............
.detled 4 r Author tee Repmsmntative
........ «__.............. Late i
Tato r
Paget 1 of 3 1557.76 /�
r'
I Jul 19 '91 16:m 0519 MPI.S. PVI
P.4
ESTIMATE VDUCHER 00. 3 A Final
Contractor Annandale Contracting, Inc.
._----- -------
Route t, Bas 19
TATE ," June t6, 1991
Annandale, No. $5302
1TRITV INPAOVERENIS ANO APPURTENANT IRK
)WIER& EAST 29D ADDITION
:ITj PROJECT NO, 90-01
lot Abe
:174,OF NDRIICELLO, NAiGBT CDMIv. RTNNESDIA
if
netted Date : Septeeler 25, 1990
Hori Started
c October i, 1990
'Ort COepieted I
COspl4ttnn Dad a July 31, 1990
YORK CONPLEIED
CONTRACT
TH19 ANDUNT
TOTAL TO PRICE
SPEC. NO. ITEM
OIIANtIIY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE U ITN THIS NONTH IRIAH1119 TOTAL PRICE
_._ ....... ..............................
CHEOULE 'A' - 001E011A10
2611.560 12' DIP CL 50 NATERRAIN
1490 L.F.
16,60
24,734.00
0.00
1,469
24,365.40
2611.500 1. DIP CL 52 NATERRAIN
1907 L.F.
13.00
24,791.00
0.00
1,903
24,719.00
2611.500 6' DIP CL 52 HYDRANT LEAD
114 L.F.
11.00
1,414.00
0.00
120
1,400.00
2611.340 12' IVIIERFL9 VALVE A 101
2 EAC*
725.00
1,450.00
0.00
2
1,450.00
2611.500 I2' IUTTERrl9 VALVE EITENSIONS
2 L.F.
20,00
40.00
0.00
1
20.00
2611.504 1' RATE VALVE 4 101
1 EACH
440.00
1,080.00
0.00
10
4,400.00
2611.500 0' GAIE VALVE OTENSIDN9
4 L.F.
20.00
00.00
0.00
2
40.00
2611.500 6' 641E VALVE A Bel
7 EACH
310,00
2,110.00
0.00
7
2,310.00
2611,500 6' SATE VALVE EXTENSIONS
4 L.F.
20.00
60.00
0.00
1
20.00
2651.500 HIOAAAIS
7 CAN
1000,00
1,000.00
0.00
7
7,000.00
261' •0 NYIRANI EXTENSIONS
4 L.F.
200.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
261. .0 FITTINGS
4500 to.
0.10
4,050.00
0.00
4,245
3,120.50
261t.5o0 I' CORPORAITO# COCK
75 INCH
25.00
625.00
0.00
20
700.00
2611.500 1' CURB STOP A IDS
25 EACH
10.00
1,150,00
0.00
21
1,960.00
2611.500 1' COPPER SERVICE PIPE
006 L.F.
6.50
5,239.00
0.00
694
4,511.00
2611.500 1' COMM$ COCK
2 EACH
10.00
160.00
0.00
2
160.00
2611.500 2' mis STOP 4 061
2 EACH
110.00
220.00
0.00
2
MOOT
2611.500 2' COPPER SERVICE PIPE
34 L.F.
9.00
306.00
0.00
36
324.00
11V.UI CONTO:CI FO E11111196 Slut
I EAtH
175.00
115.00
0.0
1
175.00
•
T 0 1 A L S C H E I U L E 'A' - N A T E R N A 1 N
6 -
71,34.00
-••~-^-
0.00
77,642.90
NEOULI '1' - SAmIIAAV
2621. 0 12' FVC PIPE SAN SNR SDI 26
S E 0 f A
24 I.F.
22.01
570.24
6.00
24
521.24
2621.500 10' PVC PIPE SAN SNR 600 15
411 L.F.
19.01
7,151.13
0.00
411
70013.11
it 2621.500 10' PVC PIPE SAN SNI SDI 26
442 L.F.
10.41
1,444.42
0.00
499
9,904."
2421.500 1' PVC PIPE DAN 614 SON 26
905 L.F.
10.51
16,151.55
0.00
904
14,133.04
2621.504 N PVC PIPE GAN so SAN SS
936 L.F.
IT.%
16,163.76
00
1176
17,480.16
2621.100 1• AIP SAN SNA CL. ''
3 L.r.
$0.00
..00
40
3
190 DO
2121.500 5' 41 SNA NAIM it. t0
12 EA.
M
a10
0
14
06
MI.% DEPTH OV4
51.11 L.F.
S
1
$7.6
40
A. DROP
1 EA.
0
S "E .4.51 N OVt
A." L.F,
,
1.4
4
:I
1 EA.
u
_
•
2b21.we .YE
it EA.
41.w
24
• 2621 6' r SDA26 SER:
14 L.r.
1.00
u
20
110.00
201. *w 4' PVC 9026 /EAVik.
5H L.F.
6.50
J,U• ,u
0.00
426
2,769.00
0 2 of 3 - 4557.10
0
1
J
Jul 19 191 16:20 DSII 1931-S. P91 P.5
ESTIMATE VOUCHER AD. 3
---------------
OAT- lug 16, 1991
t
UTILITY 111PROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANT BOAS
SAMOBERS EAST 20 ADDITION
CITY PROJECT 10. 90-01
for the
CITY OF RORTUELLD, BBISHI COUNTY, MINNESOTA
..Z.-T82.486Otaaaaaa •ta• as-MatUa
Told to Otte 1 130,236.00 6 1,779.90 1 173,051.19
Page 3 of 3 1718.67
BORT COMPLETED
CONTRACT
IRIS
"BUNT
TOTAL TO PRICE
SPEC. 90. IIEN OUANIIIY UNIT UNIT PRICE IDIAL
------- _.--------------- ---_-_...........___-_.._..........._____...----......----__..........-----.._._.-----------------
PRICE
MONTH THIS MONTH
QUANTITY TOTAL PRICE
2621.500 /' CLEANOUT
2 [A.
50.00
100.00
0.00
6
300.00
DIV II COIBECT TO EIISTINS STUB
1 EA.
201.15
201.15
0.00
1
201.15
1 0 1 A L SERE OULE 'B' - S A N I I A R t
S E N E A
..----------
_6
73,786.00
........----
1
0.00
------------
6
77,169.99
S C N E 0 U L E C - MISCELLANEOUS
A A E 5 1 0
A A I 1 0
N
2101.501 CLEARING
2 ACRE
1,150.00
2,900.00
0.00
1
2,900.00
2101.506 6RUBBINB
2 ACRE
1,150.00
2,900.00
0.00
2
1,900.00
2101.500 REMOVE 1 SALVAGE PIPE
5/ L.F.
1.00
216.00
0.00
20
80.00
2101.500 REMOVE 6 REINSTALL IS'CeP INCL. FES
3 EACH
200.06
600.00
0.60
2
600.00
2101.500 REMOVE 1 DISPOSE OF NODD FENCE
600 L.F.
0.50
300.00
0.00
618
109.00
2211.500 A66AEGAIE BASE CL. 5 (1002 CRUSHED)
100 ION
9.50
950.00
0.00
100
950.00
2575.501 51101116 (incl, felt., sulth 1 3' topsoil)
2 ACRE
600.00
1,200.00
2.7
1,620.00
2.7
1,6I0.00
(X505 SOODIRB (Intl. 6' topsoil)
1300 S.Y.
1.30
1,690.00
1,711
2,226.90
1713
2,226.90
A,3.523 9000 FIBER BLANAEIS
2200 S.Y.
1.60
3,960.00
2,185
3,933.00
2185
3,933.00
2621.500 15' CMP
56 L.F.
15.00
810.00
0.00
26
390.00
2621.500 15' CRP FLARED END SECTION
6 EA.
70.00
200.00
0.00
/
280.00
TOTAL I C H E 0 0 L I 'C' -
............
............
.......
N 1 S C E L L A N E 0 U 8 1 B E S 1 0 R A 1 1 0 R
1
u.aaama.n
15,836.00
6
1,179.90
1
15,988.90
8 A A N D TOTAL - SUN OF S C H E D U L E
S 'A' - 'C'
�/
167,986.00
............
17,779.90
..
6
mats.
170,801.19
Change Older No. 1
2,250.00
2,250.00
..Z.-T82.486Otaaaaaa •ta• as-MatUa
Told to Otte 1 130,236.00 6 1,779.90 1 173,051.19
Page 3 of 3 1718.67
Mi 19 '91 16-21 CIS" WI-5, fit
No. I
...............
DALE/ June 16, 1991
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANT YORK
SAIWBERB EAST 2111) ADDITION
CITY PROJECT 10. 90-04
tar Us
CITY OF 10110EA.L.0, 01641 COUNTY, AINKSOTA
-N
E
P.6
Contractor : Annandale Contracting, In(.
Route 1, Do- 19
Annandale, No. 55102
KDRI CONFUTED
COVIRfict lots AMOUNT Tolfif to PRICE
SPEC. IN. IIEII GMIIIV UNIT IMIT PRIES TOTAL PRICE MMIK THIS ITWH QUANTITY TOTAL PRICE
................. ......... . ...... .................................................... .......................
1) Filament to cover costs incurred by the contractor
for excessive dt"Iffing due to i1win0ed conditions
at the site. ?,ISO.00 2.2!1).00
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
17. Consideration of purchasinq tractor/mower/snowblower for the
parks department. (J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Last December the City Council authorized the public works
department to rent a 955 John Deere 4 -wheel drive hydrostatic
tractor with a 59 -inch two-stage snowblower, 72 -inch mower,
front -mount sweeper, and cab. The primary function of the
unit was to clear sidewalks of snow utilizing the blower and
broom. In addition, we wanted a unit that could also serve as
a mower for the city, as we were in need of an additional
mower unit.
The 955 with its 33 horsepower diesel engine handled the snows
over the past winter with ease. In addition, it has proved
itself to be an excellent mower unit for the park. The
operators consider it to be one of our better pieces of
equipment with its hydrostatic drive, power steeering, tight
turning radius, and ease of operation.
In preparation for a purchase, $55,000 was placed in the 1991
capital outlay budget for the park system. Originally we had
proposed a more heavy industrial type of unit for cleariny
sidewalks. Additional research by City staff and Councilman
Blonigen gave us new direction toward the use of the 955 John
Deere.
It is proposed that we keep our existing 650 John Deere to
servo as a mower and backup snowblower.
We have obtained a quote from Scharber 6 Sons of Rogers,
Minnesota, for the purchase of the tractor currently boing
rented or leased by the City. The purchase price is $14,451.
We have also contacted another John Deere dealer to obtain a
quota on a usod or demo 955 tractor similarly oquippod. The
second quote was obtained from Polfus Implement, Inc., of
Stillwater, Minnesota. The amount of that quote is
$20,902.84.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to authorize purchase of the
John Deoro 955 4-whool drive tractor from Scharbor 6 Sons
of Rogers, Minnesota, for $14,451.
2. The socond alternative would bo to return the John
Dooro 955 to Scharber and go out for bids for a now
tractor meeting the specifications of the unit tested by
the City. This may result in overall higher cost to the
28
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
City and may not be in our best interest, as the unit
tested by the City appears to work well, and we have had
no problems with the unit.
3. The third alternative would be to consider some other
type of equipment, again to act as a combination
snowblower/mowing unit or possibly two pieces of
equipment, one for mowing and one for snowblowing.
4. The fourth alcernative would be to make no purchase or
plans at this time but to continue as we are with
existing equipment and return the 955 John Deere.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and
Parks Superintendent that the City Council authorize purchase
of the 955 John Deere tractor from Scharber 6 Sone of Rogers,
Minnesota, as outlined in alternative 41 for a purchase price
of $14.451.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of literature and equipment; Copy of quotes.
29
SCHARBER & SONS
13725 MAN STREET
P.O. BOX 121
IrRS. MN 55374
,-4264107
1,;.11 rT 1 ll!M,v
®l�' DUHIP
AT lava'
AOF,N':Y NAME: C, lv-. C7F I�ONTIC$llti
r'ITY/,;T:
CONTACT:
1'KONF V:
PUCK
3tl-_QSS�.�wsRr>_1 �Iw�r.�ys�l)ny�yrQ3.Q 1:t Illo0,
7a" t� t'�a Mow.�r. ewa.\ I b9 a co
1 - J9_JVV . _ FRr__ fti� Suun4n
co
1 - Com GrD �t4.ar 1�ct��.y�!n7 n..7 dS4� 00
TOTAL FRICF aoGV3 00
—tear
Tf1TAf, TRW
TOTAi, NFT PRIOR. 14YS1 °C
POLFUS IMPLEMENT, INC.
RT, .3 BOX 63
NEW RICHMOND, W1540,7
/ 'STINGS. MN
\ ILLWATER(PARK NUnSEnY1
715 246 6565 612 439 6776
LF.AIJyF.RS111P
i.''lhAih f:!.i.✓•Til..'-�F-+n(e�{Vl./:.`....'^,is%al4L'..;jiG.':}l.s(.✓ieclP iiYli�'?C�: a L'w ATI{1)RV
City
of Monticello.
Dear
Sirs.
Polfus
lmplement at Hastings is submitting to you
price quotes
on the following; equipment:
•
1 -New John Deere 955 Demo tractor with MF%iD.
Ilydralic Valve (601ir.$).
$11,005.85.
•
1 -New 59" 2 -stage blower.
$2.450.00.
•
1 -New 72" Mid -mount mower.
$1,703.00.
•
1-246 Sweeper w/Ilyrd. angling.
$2.450.00.
•
i -New Cozy Crab.
$2.485.UU.
-Defrost
-1.lghts
-Ileater. $460.00.
'rota) pnckage price: $20,902.84.
Sincerely,
Mnrk Reuter
Polfus Implement at IlnaLinga
(612)437-7747
C
• r,.,�n - �'y%r,;tr� "„ixr:: ,-•`Z'-'yA„f. t , • r}�s.}p,, � ylt,,'e�' •'..._ .
't., 'ft i�•,,• �. �:•.: �;r .
OF
�:I .;J' -i' T/Ayp i!,!'f 1 e �.ti Y.. ; a.-•
OtO
lob
` - • S.; .r,'. +t Y , ..+ 1 { ,.rf.,• ` . 1kr : K
'�.� ti�f •�. r'y'e,, , �. i+� *i't .. ��+.� �.. .-I r'`..•tr.: 7%�.., �
. 'i•L- ��"` � ' '� eta'., ' �:.� �=`r�'ti ' S: t�.' �7 •
,I
1 e
11 SPECIFICATIONS --CONTINUED
(.E
ns
Electrical System:
Typc ....................
12 cult
llanc,y Sire .............. .
47S Cold Cranking
i
Amps () — I II'C
nhernaaw .................
40 Amp
Starter Sin ................
19 hP (1.4 kW)
Fuel System:
Type ....................
IN,cet b+_imll—
Iniectinn Pump Type...........
In Ihnr .1ciccuk
sinnult
OalAu at 71% Inad (nmwing) .. ..
I A
Dr be T rain:
1 tansmiuinn Type ............
I Iydnrsln0a2nange
Numhrt al Speeds ............
Inlhnite
final )hire .................
11MI'any
Ihakcs ...................
\\bt disk
1 Sire:ing...................
Power
1)n.rnitu'0nnlur %'bight ('npacity...
lllsflb. (162 kg)
' Axle C'apxity (In Oiv,atitm)
Punn ...... ........ . .
29141 I1. 113M Vol
Item .. ....... . ........
2alu ib. (1219 kg)
fly dt nulic Sy Mem
"I IIme of SyMcm...............
(lpcn center
\\inking 1lature........ .•
.
2-49) psi (172411 kPa)
lOmyatly'tci .
Ikar
IWmp C'atnchy ..............
7.2 fpm (0.45 illy
Cm, 1 .111. 1111th .......... ..
(SwOord)
llihh I'M C'aiwtcity
At 24' lichind Llnk Coals , ....
95111.. (434 ktt)
I III Cmntta type ......... ....
I4ahhm
1'llh
1)iV .. . ... , ... ..
t.i,c lmirpctuktl
11f) spm M
,rip121
) cari
1pR ntpi,x rymN
kltd ,
71191
Itcat.
tii!
('hath . , . ... ........
llydtanlic Multi Wik
Ihake ..... ......
11),haulkidly um,
tudkx)
Hldd catmellhs:
i trot lank...............
66181 011 1.i
Cudilµ System
4 to (1 9 11
Coanktate (with tdtn) ...
4 1 to N 11 )
'l tananlalnn R Ilydlaullr Syslcm
4 s gr) 117 11
I aal Axle tkatc a"
26to. (21I}
1\}Ighl tlwxludcs Itnrl, oll, cmdanl Intl It
I
211"1) ....... ..
kip WI).
/
t 199) Ihs 19(11 kr)
ti 4
C
C20.212-4
655, 755, 855 and 055 Tractors
DIMENSIONS -955 TRACTOR
Mechanical Form an" arts
Tires IWlkcl t'nsilion):
Rear ...... • • • . • ............ • • • • • •
11.2-16(2 pnitiml)
36M.50-15 (2 pnait.rm)
,:mm ........................ . ................
7.12 12 (rlsilnm)
27s8.50.14 (2 position)
Dimensions:
(hl•Whcdhase—in.(mm)..........................................
6a
W
1162J)
(1625)
'
(0)•0verall length with 3 -palm hitch—(mmP .......................
110.,1
.10..1
(2800)
(2800)
(C).0velall width Imin)•in. (mm). ... ..............................
i0.2
54.7
11275)
(1189)
Overall width (max) -in. (min) • • • • ..............................
59.9
61.0
(149(1)
(1549)
11)) -Inside width (min)—in. (mm) ..................................
27
24.7
(6116)
(627)
Inside width 01110—in- On'") .................................
15.7
11.0
I'M)
(797)
Ileight from ground:
(G).To aT of haxd—in, (mm) ....................................
51.1
54.4
11.1511)
(1182)
(P) -Tb top of ROI'S—in. pnm)• • ............... . ............... . .
77.1
79.,1
(1960)
(2014)
M-Cround clearance. drowluu hl uckct-uuul.......................
10.9
1 L
1277)
(279)
Wheel Trends (cenler-to-center),
Real Wheels—in. (mm) ..........................................
1R, 6.47.1
19.7.46.0
(991.1201)
(IM -1168)
Front Wheels—in. (mal) .........................................
40.4.45.5
19.6.47.3
(1027.1155)
(981.1201)
7hming radius:
With Makes—(t.(m)............................................
JIM
B.0
(2.4)
(2.4)
Wi1Maa Makes -0.(m) .........................................
11.11
11.11
12.7)
12.7)
hitch.
C1ppmrimafrly
• With r andard Roll -Gard ROPS.yprinf
0 inchra with Syria! !liQh Roll•Cunrd
Add 4 inches to top of ROl'uilysrd with a rnnnlry,
BOPS.
i
Note:
6p. DDC two in U 0J1_
G/7
SPECIFICATIONS -CONTINUED
"a
171"trical S)slem: t
Type ....................
12 voh
Ilancty Sirc ................
475 Cold Cranking
Ant).()–IR'C I
Altrtnatta .................
40 A.,p
Stattrr, She ................
1.9 hp 11.4 kW)
Karl S)stcm:
t
'I)(c ..................
Ubert injeclinn
Injection ILutp Type...........
hnlbte w1clecaic
shntulr
W11hr at 75% load (-4,g) .....
1.4
Ihhr'frain:
'I tannnissinn Type............
II)datstnlio2•rmtge
Nunthcr of Speeds ............
Infinite
I inal Ilhe................
Planetary
Ilmkcs .............. ....
%Vcl dick
Stccting...................
Pooer
1)tmsh.a iimgtx: Weight 01mily. , ,
RU/Ib. (361 kg)
Ade Cn(wily (In IhnerxtiuuI
nm I......... I . . . . . I....�
2201 Ib. Hurl lgl
Ilcm .................... i
Nd0 Ib. (121111 kg)
11)drnalic S)alrnr
1 yl.e or S) atom ..............
I l(qn center
WAing 1'le mic......... . ...
21121 psi (172411 klht)
Rnup ('l ypel ....... . .... ..
Orar
Hump Cnpsrity ..............
7 2 r)nn (0.45 Us)
CM. 1 511 Ilitdt .......... .
04mulmd)
Illhh Lill Cnpxelty
At 24' Ihldtd Link lards ... ..
417 IIs, (434 ►p
1'lllt
.................
Live Idrpendent
S(tml 11,10 ern at
.72(21 cngine rpm)
9
Mid ............... .
21121
It . .. ..... ...
5411
Chm1, ... ..
11)dtmdic Muld Mak
Iluke . ........ ....... ..
II)dt xulicxlly rem•
boiled
Hold 1'nperlllest
Fuel 'lank . .. - ... .. ,
6 6 gal 1211.) I
Ctxd)ng Systrm .. . . ,
4 p 418 I )
('rankraW (wllh film) ....
4 5 yl 14 11.1
ltanendsthm A Ilydondic Slum
4 1 psi. (171,1
1 nad Mte (kxaxse
2 6 to, 12.5 1.)
MIghl (lnchxks luel, oil, roolmd and R
1
2WI) .. ....... ..... ..
...
211W0.......... . ...
1 IM lbs (903kp
RA 4
Council Agenda - 6/24/91
18. Consideration of .a proposal for exterior restoration of the
new Monticello Fire Station. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Early last summer we were notified by D. L. Anderson b
Associates, Inc., of Maple Grove, Minnesota, the Minnesota
supplier of Sikkens siding finish material, that the new
Monticello Fire Station siding was in need of resealing. They
were concerned about some abnormal wear on the siding on the
east side of the building. Dennis Anderson of D. L. Anderson
6 Associates, Inc., attempted to find a solution to our siding
problem with the manufacturer of Sikkens finish material
through Akzo Coatings, Inc., of Troy, Michigan, the United
States supplier of this material. Through Anderson's efforts,
we were able to work out an agreement in time to have the
siding refinished during last year's construction season.
Last fall Mr. Anderson indicated to me that there would
definitely need to be some work done this summer and that he
would coordinate those efforts on behalf of the City of
Monticello. A proposal has been submitted through Akzo
Coatings, Inc., and Erickson Protective Coatings, Inc., of
Long Lake, Minnesota, a subcontractor, for the complete
renovation of tho oxtorior siding on the fire station.
Money was budgeted for a throo to four year exterior resealing
of the fire station; however, you will note that only $1,000
was budgeted in 1991 for building repairs on the fire station.
City Administrator, Rick wolfsteller, will address the budget
concerns and actual funding for this proposal at the meeting.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the proposal from Erickson Protective Coatings,
Inc., in the amount of $8,489.
2. Deny the proposal from Erickson Protective Coatings,
Inc., in the amount of $8,489.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends approval of the proposal from Erickson
Protective Coatings, Inc., in the amount of $8,489. The type
of siding that was chosen for the Monticello Fire Station does
need periodic maintenance to ensure the exterior finish of the
siding. City staff fools quite comfortable with the proposal
and references.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of letter from Akzo, Inc.; Copy of proposal; Copy of
application spocifications.
30
r J Ulf —1 0— 9 1 N O 1 1 1 a _ .¢. 1,� _ l_ r, 11 0 r2 R 9 Q 11 H.
A11(75D - Coatings Division
V`qW' 111 frill"
June 6, 1991
hION110ELLO FIREBARN
West Sixth Street
Monticello, MN 55362
To Whorn It May Concern:
After a discussion with Mr, Dennis Anderson, D.L Anderson h Associates, in which Ire
requested that f contact you about the restoration job of the hfonticello Firebarn, l ant
informing you of the following stand point of Akzo Coatings Inc. Enclosed you will find the
proposal from Erickson Prolective Coatings, Inc. in the amount of $8,489. Also enclosed you
will find the specification for the restoration.
Bated on this information, we need to work out an agreement between both companies on
how to proceed. I will copy Dennis Anderson on this letter and I have requested that Dennis
is the mediator between my company and yours. Dennis will contact you to work out an
agreement.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (313) 637.0456 or
Dennis at (612) 424-3344,
Sincerely,
raati r oct
Teclhni Director
Dcco ive Finishes
CV/
V la
cc: Dennis Anderson
OU JUN I Q 4941
gtNNanri
{
A, to (:o4d.j1 rm
oo,o.arws nnilers
ro 00• mer
r'o" X11 aPn01. toe)
1.r Isryasr•oa
' � _ _ IPpalPll•17P�
FAN fill) 649 j}�
J UIJ— 1 0-9 1 MOIJ 1 3: 04 11 . 1_ . AN LIE R S014&�ISSOC . F. 0 a
Propusal page No. / of / P16a1
ERICKSON PROTECTIVE COALING% MC.
021 RUSSELL LANE
LONG LAKE, MN IISM
475.401►
' /Ism,l�sn ya;r," SC. (�MFYOIAI7�E r�is�ey •/ 1 8 •%+�%� 40,40,7/ /rlA,1' ��
'(INTI q1 tri -
P.O, Boggy Ivl�icF//o FiiFGiv�N
urt. Ital 110 tm f:101 q1 • tqw
Y. lV di"zAN
ARMT4 t 4.11 Or n.n1 q1 nrowe
v/sit /�1oUKcF/1a, MN.
we MI.b1 1.54.1 IPrnU..rwn4 1n11111mar.1 tory
turD OV
Aks,10
-41—
Bac,
�,iF'�nTova/: 0 Aa�igaL'l►..Y __.�. __ i
iQOFreoQY;#vfj__c7 cc 419
3 Coad horojee
i 0,:;;4; J{{'•%''�'.i�:�,' �
ryo/C�_/7 j 20 CC �0 = J=- c A' S_%/�/Cti11 /•!o/�grio J ..__.-. � --_
/7/jd�luX!�2'I°� _ F �4 0 � e�l • e% !�/.. S. �3 � , o f �'��
we ;hdyaef hlttbV to furnish matlr111 and labor — eompttla In setordanq *Ith 0DOW 101tlltuGona, tot Ohl sum of:
P'ni/N 4 N m04. II tV4•r�'
u wuu w w ...•• 1... w r u •q,.w.. u .u4 w 4. 0+,.►1•I •. w..wu
W1..,••11 •1wJ••old /u1J1. Mi.
.4 a-
Y6w•1tl 0,.r •11.0 •Mti. \dhr,Iw
1 wIM+r..al rnl.MM.1.IM•..1.•.,.0..60,05 •./M.wWM MawIr0,1
0'41.1• M•W .r.....0 M— M •r•0, \u w..r. 1.1 00,41 r...p 100.04 Note MIM •q of
MNr1.w 11
.6400.t N .d\,.
r�[[fUiQll[I OI CfOV01f1� — Ih ILN•1 W41/ I804,461y.1 4I.1t✓1 _ /�
1N tM L4M4 101 Ulgrtl Irl .t 17 hr111 1.1.ate1 1'W 101 11tmntw
y 4 lw..r11A .4 .Irrtlol ri,:414 .11 M ,.11/ 14 11ynmw /11.1
Date V 11.190,0/1 11411111I1 .-------_.-----'.---�
JUN - 1 0— 9 1
7
L.AIFDERSOMMA
eeSSOC.
if
AKZO
SIKKENS WOODFINISIIES APPLICATION SPECIFICA-I ION
Fire Station - West Slxth Street
Specification 091004
P.04
Coatings DIVISlun
DMG-.The FI,Vvne{
GFNF.RAL INFORMATION - This fire station Is accented with vertical smooth California
(April 16, 1991) redwood siding. The surface was coaled in 1987 with two
coats of Ccio111L.S and one top coat or Cetol Filter 7.
Especially on the east side, the system is deteriorating, and
has to be removed. On the other locations or the building,
the system is partly deteriorated, but has to be maintained
before daninge occurs.
NOTE: Care should be taken with the sprinkler system.
At the moment, some sprinklers are wetting the siding.
Before doing the recoat joh, this should be cot rected.
MLCffJ 4AILON
PREPARA790N - Remove all old coatings with a wax free chemical paint
Eastern Exposure and power wash (not to exceed 500 pounds of water
IIressure per square inch) with clean water. Allow to dry
or three dry days.
• Sodium hydroxide type of strippers have to he ncutrolired.
Make sure you follow the Instructions or advice of the
manufacturer,
For (Also for nail Hint, %%mer
marks, etc.)
Apply byaMen sprayer an oxalic acid solution (dissuhe 4
ounces of oxalic acid crystals in 1 Gallon of wllnt water),
I et it work for IS to 70 minutes. Power wash (not to
exceed 500 pounds of water pressure per square inch) with
clean ureter. Repeating may be necessary after results,
Allow to dry for three dry days.
Wilkens
s. rualim611
M - •,*I;" r - M"
I+rr ton, 706)
U;, M14NW 7,167
111 ,31310117 Os
(A 9) r)
4 U N— 1 0— 9 1 PION 1 3: 5 5
L L. A1�DERSONBAS SOC.
�s�
P . 0 5
Coatings OIvlllon
r1P mt.e F-s%m
PREPARATION - Spray the surface wet with water. Using a "garden sera •er"
Southern, Western k type applicator, spray apply n mixture of two ounces of ri-
Northern Exposures odium phosphate ( S11), one quart of liquid hrntaebrdd
bleach and three quarts of water. Let the cleaning solution
"work" on the substrate for 15 to 20 minutes to clean the
surface. Power wash (not to exceed 500 pounds of neater
pressure per square inch) with clean water.
. Allow the siding to thoroughly dry for three days.
CAULKING
- Caulk with an acrylic or urethane based caulking along the
window frames and the affected areas (Joints, cracks tend
crevices, etc.) where moisture can enter into the siding.
SYSTEM
Eastern Exposure
1 coat of Cetol IIIS in selected color
2 coats of Cetol 01,31 in selected color
Southern, Western do
1 coat of Cetol HLS In selected color
Northern Exposure
I coat of Cetol 01.31 (heavy coat in selected color)
- All of the Cetol HRS coats should he applied with a lung
hair black chinn.ppjUjW brimde brush and the Cetol 111.11
coals with a quality long hair ndxhere of nylon/polyester
bristle hrush. Cross brush and finish along Ilne wood grain,
maintaining a wet edge. The coaling should be brushed
evenly, free of brush marks, sagge, runs and with an
appearance of poor workntnnslnip.
• Coverage of the Cetol HIS will he approximately 350
Square feet per gallon.
- Coverage of the Cetol 0L31 will be apptuxinumely, 350
square feel per gallon.
• Cetol IIIS is recoalable atter apprmxiniatcly 16 hnum and
Cetol 111.31 is recoalable after approximately, 4 finites at 70
degrees P and 65% relative humidity.
cllekans
PRECAUTIONS
The Intal system of C viol HIS and Cetul 01 31 shmiliTTie
applied within a tune period of 30 days.
I Mt(�.1hf r"uyhl
Pei M.. 1111
Irtry M14600/.tA
Tit fill) a510
t�MIA1l 12RO
rA%iSts)yn1l;
JU11— 10-91 9•10t4 t Z :56 I1. L AFIllERSUrJ&ASSOC. P. 06
Jj
AK W Coatlnp Dtrlston
OCCrrr•1lhf Flnlyh�♦
C
PRECAUTIONS Cout'd The redwood substrnic should be thoroughly dry (less 111,111
18%moisture content) for all coating applicatinns.
The Cetol HLS and Cetol 8131 should be applied only in
temperatures ranging from 50 degrees F to 90 degrees F
being careful not to apply in strone direct sunlight or on a
hot surface.
One maintenance coat of Cetol NI 11 is to he applied
approximately every three years to maintain proper layer
thickness of this protective coating system.
The Cleaning Plepatation of the Paint System informatinn
of this specification is applicahle for a F( rind or tip In six
months of the initial dating (April 16, 1991),
This specification was compiled by Akzo Coatings Inc.,
Decorative FinishesTechnlcal Deportment. Any
additional questions may be directed to Ed Bneckelandt,
Technical Support Manager at 800.833.7288.
stkk(!ns
Ak10 Coatmol Inc
o x,411.0 rin;IMf
P.0 904 toe)
tel 1!i!I 8S/•
19001933.11
FAX 131!1649• S
n1
y
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/24/01 13:40:08
WARRANT DATE VENOOP.
GENERAL CHECKING
31677 05/24/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
31678 05/24/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
31679 05/24/91 U.S. POSTMASTER
31679 05/24/01 V.S. POSTMASTER
31680 05/24/91 U.S. POSTMASTER
31031 05/24/91 MINNESOTA VALLEY LAN
31682 05/24/91 ARRTGONI BROTHERS CO
31003 05/24/91 TRIPPE/KEITH
31686 05/24/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
31685 05/24/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
31868 05/24/91 MINN DEPART OF TRANS
31087 05/24/91 JENSEN/CHRISTOPHER
31686 04/26/91 BARTON SAND 6 GQAVEL
31688 05/24/91 BARTON SANO • GRAVEL
31600 05/26/01 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA
31680 05/26/51 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA
31690 05/26/01 ADOPT -A -PET
31591 05/26/91 SOSE/TOM
31002 05/26/91 0USINESS DEVELOPMENT
31092 09/?8/91 BUSINESS OEVELOPMENr
31093 05/:C/91 f-ENTIJPV LASS
31694 05/20/91 DR. CHARLES FISH
31695 09/25/91 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC
31696 05/20/91 INDUSTRIAL 111AINT. SU
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVrt
118 WATERCRAFT REGISTRATI 583.00
118 WArERCRAFT REG 6 TITL 279.00
210 SEWER./WATER BILL POST 175.75
210 SEWER/WATER BILL POST 175.75
351.50
210 POST CAPDS/PILOT PROGR 67.50
537 BALANCE/STREETSCAPE 3.697.30
536 SALAfyCE/STREETSCAP 38.670.06
668 REIr<8/PAYROLL OEOUCTIO 54.00
118 WATERCRAFT REG # TITL 150.00
116 WATERCRAFT 6 SNOW REG 339.00
538 REFUND/SPEC ASSMT 60.76
.90137 RECYCLING PRIZE 50.00
305 MTSC S1JPP1,7eS/DARKS OF 26.48
305 WWTP SUPPLIES 274.61
300.60
90 REG FEE/S ANDERSON 105.00
00 REG FEE/R WOLFSTELLER105.00
070 00
4 ANIMAL ADOPTIONS $26.00
336 TRAVEL EXPENSE 20.25
26 PROF SER/AROPLAX PROJ 262.50
26 MISC PROF SERVICES/HR 300.00
562.50
270 CLEANING SUP/PARK$ 77.03
90136 TREE REPLACEMENT 30.00
65 GAS/FIFE DEPART 194.20
614 MISC SUP/SHOP i1 GARAGE 76.13
-CHECK TOTAL
*CHECK TOTAL
#CHECK TOTAL
-CHECK TorAl,
IN
m
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/24/01 13:40:06
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
31697 05/20/91 KOPOPCHAK/OLIvE
31608 05/28/91 MARCO BUSINESS PRODU
31099 05/28/91 MINNESOTA CITY MANAG
31700 05/28/01 MOBIL
31700 05/28/91 MOBIL
31700 05/28/91 MOBIL
31700 05/28/91 MOBIL
31701 05/28/91 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
31702 05/28/01 MTI DISBTRIBUTING CO
31703 05/28/91 OLSON. USSET.AGAN A
31703 05/28/91 OLSON. USSET.AGAN A
31703 05/28/91 OLSON. USSET.AGAN A
31704 05/78/91 ORR-SC MEL EN -MAY ERON
31704 05/28/01 ORR-SCMELEN-MAYERON
31704 05/28/91 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
31704 05/28/91 ORR-SCMELEN-NAVERON
31706 05/21!191 OP.P- SCHELEN-MAYERON
31704 05/26/01 ORP-SCHELEN-n1AYERON
31706 05/29/91 OPP-SCHELEN-MAYERON
31705 05/26/91 SHELTON COMPANY
31705 05/20/91 S14ELTON COMrANY
31705 05/20/91 SHELTON COMPANY
31706 05/26/91 SHIELY MASONRY PROOU
31707 05/26/01 SPEC MATERIALS. INC.
31707 05/20/91 SPEC MATERIALS. INC.
31706 05/20/91 ST. CLOUD TIMES
31700 04/26/01 STAR TRIBUNE
31710 05/20/91 WOLPSTELLER/RICMARO
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM.�r
97 TRAVEL EXPENSE 30.59
106 TYPEWRITER MTC AGREf.M 175.00
230 MEMBERSHIP OUES/RICK W 50.00
131 GAS/WATER DEPT 40.06
131 GAS/SEWER COLL DEPT 60.05
131 GAS/STREET DEPT 70.18
191 GAS/BLD INSPECT 60.22
216.51 -CHECK TO'
185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRA 813.25
290 VEHICLE SUP/DARK DEPT 133.67
292 tAISC LEGAL FEES 80G.25
202 LEGAL FEES/HRA 401.75
292 PROF SER/SANDBEP.G EAST 75.00
1.263.00 ICHECK TO
102 ENG SER/NATER RESER 1.210.70
162 MISC ENGINEERING FEES 656.01
162 ENG SER/SCHOOL/VALUE 209.25
162 ENG SER/PLAN A 70N 453.30
102 ENG SER/NRA FUND 366.75
182 ENG SER/AROPLAX.PROJEC 69.75
102 ENG SER/BRIAR. OAK EST 174.36
3.330.01
200 SOFTWARE/ RECYLING PRO 706.00
200 COMPUTER EOUIP/REFUSE 000.00
209 RECYCLING SCANNING PR 300.00
1.600.00
530 STREET SUPPLIES 37.10
100 ADJUST CODING 2.550.000R
100 CRACK FILLER 3.661.50
001.50
340 TREE CHIPPER AO 17.50
107 TREE CHIPPER AD 65.00
217 MISC SEMINAR EXPENSE 270.30
TOTAL 54.303.33
ICHECK TO
1CMECK TO
ICHECK TO
/
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/05/91 16:17:20 Disbursement Journal
y WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM Ir.
GENERAL CHECKING
31711 05/30/91 RIDGEWAY APARTMENTS .90138 RECYCLING PRIZE 50.00
31712 05/30/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAFT REG d TITL 273,00
31713 05/30/91 MN,OEPART OF NATURAL. 118 WATERCRAFT/SNOW REG 404.00
31714 05/30/91 STEELE/R. C. 540 ANIMAL CONTROL SUPPLI 385.04
GENERAL CHECKING •TOTAL 1.112.94
i
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/10/91 10:43:25
Disbursement Journal
WARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLAI
\It'
GENERAL
CHECKING
31715
06/10/91
ROADRUNNER
542
COMPUTER REPAIRS
65.25
31716
00/10/01
HAVES/WILMA
285
INFO CENTER SALARY
100.63
31716
06/10/91
HAVES/WILMA
265
INFO CENTER SALARY
59.SOCR
121.13
$CHECK TO
31717
06/10/91
NORTHWEST MINNESOTA
156
CONFERENCE REG/GAP.Y
A 10.00
31710
06/16/01
ST. CLOUD APPRAISAL.
426
APPRAISAL/NELSON PR
2.500.00
31719
06/10/91
MN DEPART OF NATURAL
110
WATERCRAFT P.EG 0 TITL
139.00
31720
06/10/91
MN DEPART OF NATURAL
110
WATERCRAFT/ATV REG
$50.00
31721
06/10/91
AME READY MIX
0
CRACK SEALER/STREETS
24.46
31722
06/10/01
ANOERSON It ASSOCIATE
10
PICNIC TABLE FRAMES
1.023.76
31722
06110/91
ANDERSON b ASSOCIATE
10
PAINT $ MISC STREET
1.409.35
2.513.11
*CHECK TO
31723
00/10/91
ANNANDALE VETERINARY
362
ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
208.00
31724
00/10/01
BARSNESS DRUG
544
FILM/PW INSPECTIONS
11.89
'24
j
31725
06/10/91
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
PHONE CHAP.OES
747.00
31725
00/10/91
BRIOGEWATER TELEPHON
24
PHONE CHARGES
06.60
31725
06/10/91
BRIDGEWATER TELIPHO14
24
PHONE CHARGES
07.52
J
31725
06/10/01
SRIOGEWATER TELEPHON
24
PHONE CHARGES
38.58
31725
00/10/01
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
PHONE CHARGES
08.70
31725
06/10/01
BRIDGEWATER TELEPMON
24
PHONE CHARGES
74.82
$1725
00/1010/
BRIDGEWATER MORMON
24
PHONE CHARGES
20.00
31725
00/10/01
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
PHONE CHARGES
13.50
31725
00/10/0t
BRIODEVATCR TOLEPMON
24
PHONE CHARGES
44.79
31125
06/10/01
15RIOGEWATOR T£LEPHON
24
PHONE CHARGES
20.00
31725
00/tO/91
641009WATER TELEPHON
24
PHONE C14AROIS
30.26
31125
00110/DI
6RIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
PHONE CHARGES
44.70
31725
08/10191
64I0GEWATER TELEPMON
24
PHONE CHARGES
15.00
31725
06/10/01
6RIDGEWATE R MORMON
24
OHONE CHARGES
10.74
31725
04/10/91
SRTOOEVATER TELEPMON
24
PHONE C14AROOS
70.00
1.335.00
fCMECK T.
31720
00/10/91
SUCK HEAD CHEMICAL C
525
MISC SUPPLIES/SHOP 6
120.41
31727
06/10/01
DAVIS WATER EDUIPMEN
200
LINE TRACER W/CLAMP
2.850.00
31728
00/10/91
OUERR'S WATER CARE 8
40
WATER CARE/WVTP RENTAL
14.25
31720
06/10/')1
FEEORITE CONTROLS. I
56
MISC PROF WV/WATER
38.00
31729
06/10/91
FEEORIIE CONTROLS. I
SO
CMEMICALS/SUNNY FRE
1.90A.00
1.640.00
OCHECK T
i
Lq
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/10/91 10:43:25
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
31730 06/10/91 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE
31731 06/10/91 MAYDEN-MURPHY EOUIPM
31732 06/10/91 HERM£S/JERRY
31733 06/10/91 HOGLUND COACH LINES
31734 00/10/91 MARCO BUSINESS PROOU
31735 05/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
31735 06/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
31735 06/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
31735 06/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
31735 05/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
31735 00/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
31735 06/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
31735 06/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
31730 00/10/91 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
31736 06/10/01 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
31737 06/10/91 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
31737 06/10/91 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
31737 06/10/91 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
31737 06/10/91 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
31737 06/10/01 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
31730 00/10/91 NOBLE FARMS
31739 00/10/91 NORWEST INVESTMENT S
31740 00/10/01 O.E.I. BUSINESS FORM
31741 00/10/91 PACE. INCORPORATED
31742 06/10/91 POLKA OOT RECYCLING
31743 00/10/91 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
31763 06/10/01 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
317h4 06/10/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
31744 00/10/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
31744 06/10/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
31744 00/10/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
1174b 06/10/91 SIM0NSON LUMBER COMP
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM IN
64 SEEOER-RENTAL/PARKS OE 04.89
541 CARBURATOR/STREETS 226.20
81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50
483 TRANSPORTATION CONT 4.783.05
100 COPY MACHINE TONER/PW 164.00
115
UTILITIES
80.39
115
UTILITIES
31.00
115
UTILITIES
16.61
115
UTILITIES
111.38
115
UTILITIES
13.80
115
UTILITIES
23.80
115
UTILITIES
3.00
115
UTILITIES
54.61
334.50
165 ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRA 463.25
105 MILEAGE EXPENSE 00.00
553.25
144 VAC -ALL PARTS 567.6#1
144 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/PARK 0.59
144 EQUIP REP PARTS/STREETS 2.05
144 SMALL TOOLS/SHOP B GAR 76.00
144 MISC SUPPLIES/FIRE DEP 46.55
719.60
411 TREES/DARKS DEPT 057.00
155 COMPUTER PAYMENT 2.407.01
150 COPY MACHINE PAPER 160.70
340 WATER ANALYSIS/MATER 172:00
170 RECYCLING CONTRACT 1.744.27
175 SUNNY FRESH MONITOR 1.390.34
175 WWTP CONTRACT PAVM 29.714.05
31.113.30
103 VAC -ALL PARTS A REPAI 114.06
103 OLO MATERIALS/PARK OE 300.01
103•MISC SUPPLIES/PARK DEP 45.00
103 EOUI► REPAIR PARTS/PARK 0.53
103 SLO REPAIR SUPPLIES/PA 70.60
*CHECK TOT
+CHECK TOT
*CHECK TOT
*CHECK TOT
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/10/91 10:43:25
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM
641.70
31745
06/10/91
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
280
TOWELS & SOAP/LIBRARY 48.95
31746
06/10/91
STATE OF MINN.-
CPV
'390
MEMBERSHIP OUES/AOMIN 350.00
31747
06/10/91
UNITOG RENTAL
SERVIC
211
UNIFORM RENTAL
6.58
31747
06/10/91
UNITOG RENTAL
SERVIC
211
UNIFORM RENTAL
6.50
31747
06/10/91
UNITOG RENTAL
SERVIC
211,
UNIFORM RENTAL
12.80
31747
00/10/91
UNITOG P,ENTAL
SERVIC
211
UNIFORM RENTAL
12.80
31747
06/10/91
UNITOG RENTAL
SERVIC
211
UNIFORM RENTAL
94.01
31747
06/10/91
UNiTOG RENTAL
SERVIC
211
UNIFORM RENTAL
62.67
195 .hh
31748
06/10/91
UNOCAL
213
GAS/FIRE DEPT
17.96
31740
06/10/91
VASKO RUBBISH
REMOVA
524
GARBAGE CONTRACT
7.852.00
31749
00/10/91
VASKO RUBBISH
REMOVA
524
SALES TAX/GARBAGE
CON 432.84
"
9.284.84
31750
00/10/91
WP.IGHT-HENNEPII7 COOP.
512
UTILITIES
8.22
31751
06/10/91
YONAK LANDFILL. INC.
223
ADD'L LANDFILL CHAR 5.867.10
GENERAL
CHECKING
TOTAL
70.843.21
•CHECK TOT.
*CHECK TOT,
•CHECK TOT.
f�
191
1
•CHECK TOT.
*CHECK TOT,
•CHECK TOT.
f�
191
BRC FIIIAIICIAL SYSTEM
06/13/91 13:46:07
WARRANT DATE VENOOR
GENERAL CHECKING
31752 06/24/91 A T 6 T INFO SYSTEMS
31753 06/24/01 ADVANCED FIBERGLASS
31753 06/24/91 AOVANCEO FIBERGLASS
31754 06/24/91 ARA CORY REFRESHMENT
31755 06/24/91 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
31750 00/24/91 BEH FRANKLIN
31757 06/74/01 RIFFS. INC.
31758 00/24/91 BIG LAVE MACHINE
31750 06/24/91 ROSE/TOat
31760 00/?4/91 CENTPAL MCGOVAN. INC
31761 06/24/01 COAST TO COAST
31701 06/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31761 06/24/01 COAST TO COAST
31701 00/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31761 06/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31701 06/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31761 06/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31701 00/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31761 06/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31701 00/24/01 COAST TO COAST
31761 06/24/01 COAST TO COAST
31761 00/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31761 06/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31701 06/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31701 05/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31751 06/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31701 06/24/01 COAST TO COAST
31761 06/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31781 06/24/01 COAST TO COAST
31701 06/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31701 08/24/01 COAST TO COAST
31701 00/24/91 COAST TO COAST
31702 00/24/91 COMMUNICATION AUOITO
31763 06/24/71 COPY OUPLCATING PR00
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM L
15 FIRE PHONE CHARGES 4.40
543 MISC EQUIPMENT/HATER 0 36.59
543 VEHICLE PARTS/MATER OE 36.59
73.18
409 MISC SUPPLIES/CITY HAL 40.00
11 RADIO REPAIRS/CITY HAL 46.50
20 FILM/PW INSPECTIONS 19.99
395 LATRINE RENTAL/PARKS 112.28
495 PARTS FOR VAC -ALL 10.50
336 MILEAGE EXPENSE 18.75
30 SUPPLIES/SHOP 6 GAR 16.95
35 GLOVES/WATER DEPT 24.35
35 OLD REPAIR SUP/VATER 0 47.74
35 MISC REPAIR SUP/HATER 0.37
35 SLO REP SUP/CITY HALL 5.74
35 n1ISC SUPPLIES/FIRE DEP 21.44
35 MIS SUPPLIES/WATER OE 210.05
35 REP 1 MTC/BIOS/PARK DEP 1.08
35 GLOVES.ETC/STREET DEPT 13.35
35 UTILITY MTC SUP/WATER 1.09
35 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/STR 27.55
33 STREET MTC MATERIALS' 8.05
33 VEHICLE MTC/STREETS 20.75
35 MISC SUPPLIES/PARK OE 423.43
35 MISC SUPPLIES/SHOP i OA 0.77
35 CLOTH SUPPLIES/PARKS OE 0.58
35 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/DAR 60.12
35 MISC SUPPLIES/MUSEUM A.80
35 SMALL TOOLS 6 EQUIP/PK 31.47
35 VAC ALL PARTS 00.23
35 14ISC SUPPLIES/ANIMAL 17.59
35 MISC SUPPLIES/LIBRARY 10.57
35 CLEANING SUPPLIES/LIBR 10.74
1.076.60
30 PAGER REPAIRS/FIRE OE 164.06
61 COPY MACHINE MTC/LIBRA 45.00
•CHECK TO
VCHECK TO
RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/13/91 13:46:07
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
31764 OG/24/9I DYNAMIC SYSTEMS. INC
31765 06/24/91 FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER
31766 OG/24/91 GOPHER. STATE ONE CAL
"31767 06/24/91 GREG SMITH 6 ASSOC
317,0 0,/24/91 HAPPY S AUTO SUPPLY
31768 06/21-/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
31768 06/24/91 HAPPY'S AUTO SUPPLY
31766 06/74/01 HARPY'S AUTO SUPPLY
317GB 06/74/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
31768 06/24/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
31768 06/24/91 MAPRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
31766 06/24/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
31768 06/24/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
31709 00/74/91 HENE RY & ASSOCIATES
31770 06/24/01 HERMES/JERRY
31771 06/74/91 J M OIL COMPANY
31771 06/24/91 J M OIL COMPANY
31772 08/24/91 J.C. BODY SHOP
31773 06/24/91 m & P TRANSPnRT. INC
31774 06/24/91 MACOUEEN EOV IPMENT I
31775 OG/24/91 MART IE'S FAPIA SERVIC
31775 06/24/91 MAPTIE'S FARM SERVIC
31775 00/24/91 MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC
31775 06/24/01 MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC
31775 06/24/91 MARTIE'S FAR". SERVIC
31770 00/24/91 MCDOWALL COMPANY
31776 00/24/91 MCOOWALL COMPANY
31777 06/24/01 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
31777 00/24/91 MONTICELLO OFFICE OR
31777 00/24/91 MONTICELLO OFFICE OR
31777 00/24/91 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
31777 06/24/01 MONTICELLO OFFICE OR
31777 00/24/91 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAI `)I
478 EOUIP/WWTP 19.875.00
55 SHRUBS/CITY HALL 113.70
G9 PROF SERVICES/WATER 0 135.00
_194 LEGAL FEES 12.20
78 E^1JTP REP PARTS/STREET 18.99
78 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS/ 132.11
76 rAISC SUPPLIES/WATER OEP 4.90
78 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS/PK 5.25
79 SMALL TOO'.S/SHOP & GAR 3.14
78 REPAIR R MTC/STREETS 82.66
78 VEH rt TC/BLO INSPECTIONS 3.62
78 VAC -ALL REPAIRS 159.21
78 EOIJIP REPAIR PAP.TS/FIR 11.63
421.51
545 HYDRANT/PARKS DEPT 185.09
01 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50
95 GAS/STREET DEPT 217.80
05 MOTOR FUELS/PARKS DEPT 14.25
232.05
03 VEHICLE REPAIRS/FIRE 125.00
205 SAND/BALLFIELOS/PARKS 779.37
104 VAC ALL PARTS 537.11
107 MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS OE 29.90
107 MISC SUPPLIES/SHOP d G 73.70
107 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 0.70
.107 ANIMAL/CLEANING SUPPLI 33.86
107 MISC SUPPLIES/LIBRARY 22.52
118.48
111 AIR CONO REPATRS/CITY 070.41
111 AIR COND REP/FIRE MALL 86.00
750.41
136 OFFICE SUPPLIES/O WORK 10.70
130 COPY MACHINE PAPER/P V 53.89
136 OFFICE SVP/PLAN & )ON 4.36
130 COPY MACHINE PAPER/LIB 41.90
138 OFFICE SUPPLIES/LIBRAR 11.70
130 OFFICE SUPPLIES/CITY 300.77
'CHECK TC
i
•CHE JTr
-CHECK I
-CHECK 7
/
v BPC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/13/9/ 13:46:07
WARRANT DATE VF.NOOP.
GENERAL CHECKING
L
L.
31779 06/24/01 MONTICELLO PRINTING
31779 00/24/91* MONTICELLO PRINTING
31778 06/24/91 MONTICELLO PRINTING
31779 06/24/91 MONTICELLO TIMES
31779 06/24/91 MONTICELLO TIMES
31770 06/24/91 MONTICELLO TIMES
31779 00/24/91 MONTICELLO TIMES
31779 06/24/01 MONTICELLO TIMES
31779 00/24/91 MONTICELLO TIMES
31779 05/24/91 MONTICELLO TIMES
31779 06/24/91 MONTICELLO TIMES
31779 06/24/91 MONTICELLO TIMES
31779 06/24/91 MONTICELLO TIMES
31780 06/24/91 OLSON R SONS ELECTRI
31180 06/24/91 OLSON A SONS ELECTRI
31780 06/24/91 OLSON 8 SONS ELECTRI
31781 00/24/91 OMANN BROTHERS. INC.
31782 05/24/91 PLUMBERV-PURCELL'S P
31782 00/24/91 PLUMBERV-PURCELL'S P
31782 06/24/01 PLUMBERV-PURCELL'S P
31762 00/24/91 PLUMBERV-PURCELL'S P
31763 06/24/91 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
31763 06/24/91 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
31764'06/24/91 RELIABLE CORPORATION
31765 00/24/91 RUFF AUTO PARTS
31766 08/24/01 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP.
317@7 00/24/91 SCMAROER • SONS. INC
31167 06/24/01 SCHARSER A SONS. INC
31719 06/24/51 SPECTRUM SANITARY SU
DisburSement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM It
489.50
137 SHIPPING LABELS/CITY H 57.50
137 MISC SUPPLIES/REFUSE 38.80
137 BUSINESS CARDS/6LD INS 40.50
130.80
140 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 1.220.57
140 6LO PERMIT INFORMATION 05.20
140 LEAF PU/RECYCLING INF 316.30
140 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES 60.56
140 SEAL COATING AD 51.00
140 SUMMER HELP WANTED AO 73.36
140 SIDEWALK PROJECT INFO 95.15
140 POWER GENERATOR AO 43.75
140 TREE CUTTER AD 56.40
140 WATER TOWER AO 48.90
2.031.50
160 BLD REPAIR SVD/CITU MA 11.01
160 SLO MTC REPAIRS/CITY H 40.00
100 WELL REPAIRS/WATER DER 00.38
117.30
334 ROCK/STREET DEPT 191.59
251 EOLIIP REPAIRS/WATER OE 47.20
251 6LO REPAIR SUP/PARKS 306.74
251 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/SEW 80.28
251 CITY HALL BLO REP SUP 0.95
417.17
173 FIRE HALL CLEANING CON 50.00
173 CITY HALL CLEANING CO 400.00
450.00
179 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.95
206 BATTERY/FIRE DEPT 05.00
184 MTC OF EQUIP/SHOP A 0 104.28
729 MISC PARTS/DARKS DEPT 39.54
229 MTC OF EQUIPMENT/DARK 151.60
191.34
499 SUPPLIES/PARKS DEPT 54.56
+CHECK TO'
+CHECK TO
•CHCCK TO
•CHECK TO
•CHECK TO
$CHECK TO
•CHECK TO
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/13/91 13:46:07
Disbur3ement Journal
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
CLAIM
GENERAL CHECKING
Y•
31769 06/24/91 VISION ENERGY
516
14ISC SUPPLIES/STREETS 26.00
31700 06/24/91 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO
210'AUDIT
VERIFICATION 25.00
31790 06/24/91 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO
219
SHERIFF'S CONTRACT 14.330.95
'
14.361.05
•CHECK TO -
31791 06/24/91 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPO•
224
JUNE CONTRACT PAYMENT G25.00
GENERAL CHECKING
FOTAL 44.455.15
n
Y•
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/05/91
.13:19:18
Disbursement Journal
WARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLAIM J
LIQUOR FUND
��• 15690
05/28/81
U S WEST COMMUNICATI
800093
ADVERTISING
21.80
'
15697
05/28/91
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
WINE PURCHASE
32.50
L
15698
05/28/91
GRIGGS. COOPER & COM
800018
LIQUOR PURCHASE
964.18
15699
05/28/91
PAUSTIS & SONS
800103
WINE PURCHASE
28.95
15700
05/28/91
COMMISSIONER OF REVE
800006
SALES TAX FOR APRIL
8.333.30
15701
05/28/81
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.311.50
15701
05/28/91
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
WINE PURCHASE
920.19
2.231.78
•CHECK T�
15702
05/28/91
ACTION SEMINARS
800105
SEMINAR REGISTRATION 35.00
15703
05/28/91
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
2.113.30
13703
05/28/91
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
800040
WINE PURCHASE
153.50
15703
05/28/91
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
800040
MIX AND MISC SUPPLIES
160.72
2.427.52
•CHECK TC
15704
05/28/91
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
000037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
2.762.60
15704
05/20/91
PHILLIPS 0 SONS CO/E
800037
WINE PURCHASE
574.00
3.435.68
*CHECK TC
15705
05/20/91
QUALITY WINE A SPIRI
000040
WINE PURCHASE
49.55
15705
05/28/91
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
000040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
3.010.02
3.060.47
PCHECK TC
15706
05/28/01
GRIGGS. COOPER A COM
600016
LIQUOR PURCHASE
3.517.04
15707
05/20/91
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
MIX PURCHASE
75.38
15707
05/20/91
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
WINE PURCHASE
83.54
15701
05/20/91
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
000012
SEER PURCHASE
45.00
204.12
*CHECK TC
15700,05/20/01
JOHNSON EROS WHOLESA
000022
WINE PURCHASE
2.223.00
15700
05/28/91
JOHNSON EROS WHOLESA
000022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
005.70
3.020.00
•CHECK T'
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
20.104.11
8RC FIuA.NCIAL SYSTEM
09/10/91
10:44:54
Disbursement Journal
WARRANT
GATE
VENOOR•
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
l
CLAIN 't::
���///
LIOUOR FUND
15709.0
0/10/91
GRIGGS. COOPER 1 COH
800018
LIQUOR PURCHASE
3.317.46
15710
O 8/10/91
EAGLE WTNE COMPANY
800012
WINE PURCHASE
1.202.19
15711
06/10/91
JOHNSON OROS WMOLESA
800022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
468.19
�• 15712
06/10/91
CUSTOM INTERIOR CARE
800104
CARPET CLEANING
A5.00
15713
06/10/91
QUALITY WINE & SPIR1
800040
WINE PURCHASE
10.26
15713
08/10/91
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
363.61
379.87•
*CHECK TOT
15714
06/10/01
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA
800001
POP PURCHASE
448.25
15715
06/10/91
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
600002
TELEPHONE CHARGES
85.06
15718
06/10/01
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL/TO
000062
LICENSE APPLICATION
250.00
15717
00/10/91
CITY OF MONTICELLO
800003
SEWER ANO WATER BILL
60.29
15710
09/10/91
COMMISSIONER OF REVE
800008
MAY SALES TAX
11.030.70
•15710
06/10/91
OAHLHEIMER OISTRIBUT
800009
BEER PURCHASES
26.017.05
15710
00/10/01
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUT
800009
JUICE PURCHASE
61.75
15719
06/10/91.OAHLMEIMER
OISTP.IBUT
800009
MIK PURCHASE
07.00
28.155.00
sCHEC1T
15720
09/10/91
OAVMOR HAMCO
800089
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
84.05
15721
00/10/01
DAY DISTRIBUTING COM
800010
LEMONS
5.60
19721
00/10/91
DAY DISTRIBUTING COM
800010
BEER PURCHASE
798.50
902.10
*CHECK TOT
10722
06/10/91
DICK WHOLESALE CO..
800011
BEER PURCHASE
1.730.75
10727
06/10/01
DICK WHOLESALE CO..
000011
MISC SUPPLIES
45,.50
1.707.25
4CHEC9 TOT
15723
60/10/01
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
000012
WINE PURCHAS
000'.15
15724
00/10/91
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I
000019
BEER PURCHASE
17.074.00
15724
00/10/01
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I
000019
JUICE PURCHASE
11.00
15724
00/10/91
GROSSLEII7 BEVERAGE 1800019
GLASSES AND MUGS
103.00
17.700.50
SCHECK TOT
15720
0010/91
M 4 H INDUSTRIES. IN
400000
LIGHT BULBS
331.00
19720
00/10/91
DUDE CANDY A TOBACCO
000021
GIGS AND CIGARS
413.01
15770
00/10/91
JUDE CANDY 1 TOBACCO
000021
SAGS
277.00
15726
01/10/01
JUDE CANDY 6 TOBACCO
100021
MISC SUPPLIES
84.10
001.11
-FHECK TOT
1
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/10/91 10:44:54 Disbursement Journal
WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM I1•
-CHECK TOT
•CHECK TOT,
LIOUOR FUND
l'-
15727
06/10/91
KRWC RADIO STATION
800024
AOVERTISING
96.00
15728
06/10/01
LIEFERT TRUCKING
800025
FREIGHT CHARGES
497.81
15729
06/10/91
MCOOWALL COMPANY
800065
MTC OF EUIPOMENT
357.35
•
15730
06/10/01
MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
800028
UTILITIES
35.01
15731
05/10/9.1
r,.OuTICELLO TIreES
800032•
ADVERTISING
125.25
15732
06/10/91
NORTHERN STATES POWE
800035
UTILITIES
723.69
15733
OG/10/91
O'HARA BROS. COMPANI
800056
JUICE PURCHASE
44.90
15733
06/10/01
O'HARA BROS..COMPANI
800058
MISC PURCHASES
378.45
423.35
15734
06/10/01
PAUSTIS A SONS
800103
WINE PURCHASE
238.75
15735
00/10/91
RON'S ICE COMPANY
800041
ICE PURCHASE
761.04
15736
06/10/81
SEVEN-UP BOTTLING CO
800043
POP PURCHASE
315.65
15737
00/10/91
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
800045
JUICE PURCHASE
50.45
13737
06/10/01
ST, CLOUD RESTAURANT
800045
MISC PURCHASES
145.40
195.85
15738
06/10/01
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
800046
BEER PURCHASE
24.124.30
15739
00/10/91
TWIN CITIES FLAG 60U
800049
FLAG REPAIRS
31.80
�-
15740
06/10/01
VIKING COCA-COLA BOT
800051
POP PURCHASE
458.60
15741
00/10/91
WRIGHT WAY SHOPPER
800106
ADVERTISING
531.25
' 13742
06/10/01
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
800054
MISC SUPPLIES
30.55
L•IOUOR FUND
TOTAL
94.968.16
1
rA�
�
-CHECK TOT
•CHECK TOT,