Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 07-22-1991
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 22, 1991 - 7:00 p.m. Mayor: Ken Maus Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1991. 3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. 4. Public hearing and consideration to adopt a resolution relating to the modification by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello of the Redevelopment Plan relating to Redevelopment Project No. 1, the modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plans relating to Tax Increment Financing District Nos. 1-1 through 1-12, and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1- 13, all located within Redevelopment Project No. 1, and the approval and adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plans relatinq thereto. 5. Consideration of issuing a negative declaration, Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Cardinal [tills residential subdivision. 6. Consideration of approving developer's agreement governing City/developer installed improvements --Cardinal Hills Phase I. 7. Consideration of a preliminary and final plat request entitled Phase I of Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. Applicant, Value Plus Homes. 8. Consideration of a request to rezone 10 acres located south of the proposed elementary school site and adjacent to County Road 117. Request is to rezone from AO (agricultural) to R-1 (single family residential). Applicant, Value Plus Homes. 9. Consideration of a request to amond Section 3-2: General Building and Performance Requirements, by adding a provision requiring a two -car garage be constructed along with construction of each single family dwelling unit. 10. Consideration of a request for a conditional use permit which would allow public school use in an R-1 (single family residential) zoning district. Applicant, Monticello School District 1882. Council Agenda July 22, 1991 Page 2 11. Consideration of a request to rezone 120 acres of land from AO (agricultural) to R-1 (single family residential), which would allow development of an elementary school facility as a conditional use. Applicant, Monticello School District #882. 12. Consideration of a resolution accepting bid and ordering City Projects 91-01 (Fallon Avenue), 91-02 (Briar Oakes Estate), and 91-03 (Cardinal Hills Phase I). 13. Consideration of resolution authorizing the issuance of general obligation improvement bonds for Projects 91-01, 91-02, and 91-03. 14. Consideration of outside storage of construction equipment. Applicant, Floyd Kruse. 15. Council Update --Review status of Evergreens residential subdivision --No action requested. 16. Consideration of establishing animal impoundment fee schedule. 17. Consideration of Wright County State Bank using streetscape bridge railing sections along Highway 25 and in their parking lot. 18. Consideration of bills for the month of July. 19. Adjournment. I MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - M0?7TICELL0 CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 8, 1991 - 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Ken Maus, Dan Blonigen Members Absent: Clint Herbst 2. Approval of minutes. After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Shirley Anderson to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held June 24, 1991. Voting in favor of the motion: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Ken Maus. Abstaining: Dan Blonigen. 3. Citizens comments/petitions, reouests, and complaints. Mickey Peterson, manager of the Professional Approach Beauty Salon, informed Council that she was treated poorly when dealing with a problem with her water bill. She indicated that she will be sending a letter that outlines the problem in detail. She noted that City statt involved with customer service should be required to take classes to develop public relations skills. Ken Maus thanked Peterson for her comments and noted the importance of bringing problems to the attention of Council. Rick Wolfstellor indicated that as soon as he received the letter from Peterson that he would look into the matter and report back to Council. 4. Consideration of reviewing the Economic Development Authority's JEDAI approval of Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) Loan No. 003 for Aroolax Corporation. 011ie Koropchak reported that Aroplax Corporation has appliod for a loan in the amount of $30,000 to assist with the purchase of machinery and equipment. The interest rate on the loan is 6.5% to be amortized over a 7 -year period, and the loan approval is subject to Companion Bank and Small Business Administration funding of the remaining project costs. Koropchak indicated that the facility will be approximately 23,000 sq ft and will bring 25 now fobs to the community. In her summary, Koropchak noted that the Economic Development Authority roviowod the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund Page 1 0 Council Minutes - 7/8/91 Guidelines and voted to approve the loan request, as the request meets all public purpose criteria noted in the fund guidelines. Ken Maus asked if the proposed loan is a result of a gap in financing, or was the loan being provided as an incentive to attract Aroplax to Monticello. Koropchak responded by saying that although the financing gap is difficult to completely prove, the financial statement indicated that the $30,000 injected into the plan, although a small part of the overall finance plan, provided an important source of funds. Council took no action on the matter; therefore, the Economic Development Authority's recommendation is supported by the City Council, and the loan may be issued. Consideration of adopting a resolution calling for a public hearing on the proposed modification by the HousinSL and Redevelopment Authoritv in and for the City of Monticello of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Proiect No. 1, the modification of the tax increment financing plans for Tax Increment Financinq District Nos. 1-1 through 1-12, and the adoption of the Lax Increment financo plan for Tax Increment Financing District 1-13, all located within Redevelopment Proiect No. 1 (Shingobee TIF Plan). After discussion, a motion was made by Dan Blonigen and seconded by Brad Fyle to adopt a resolution calling for the public hearing on July 22, 1991. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 91-23. 6. Consideration of renewinq animal services agreement --Patty Salzwedel. Rick Wolfsteller reported that since July of 1988 the City has had a contract arrangement with Patty Salzwedel of Monticello to perform the animal control functions for the City, including the daily dog pound maintenance. Both the pound and the animal control agreements were for a one-year time period and were automatically renewable for additional one-year terms. Since the agreement is up for renewal in July, the contract and her compensation should be reviewed by Council. Wolfsteller went on to note that Patty and Tracy have been doing an excellent job in both cleaning and maintenance of the dog pound facility and have provided excellent animal control services. City staff has had very few complaints regarding animal control services, and Patty has been instrumental in recommending numerous changes to our animal control ordinance, Page 2 Q Council Minutes - 7/9/91 including a requirement for dog license renewals and vaccination for rabies. Patty has also organized and held two rabies clinics for the Monticello public, which have seen favorable response from our citizens and has also resulted in increasing the number of licenses issued. Patty 'a record keeping has been excellent with well-maintained and accurate information regarding impoundment and retrieval of animals from the other 11 cities and townships that contract with the City of Monticello for using our shelter. Dan Blonigen concurred that Salzwedel is doing a good job and noted that an annual increase is appropriate. Council discussed raising the price charged to other cities for use of the Monticello dog pound. Salzwedel noted that the present charge of $7.25 per day is probably an average charge or slightly below that which other similar facilities charge. Ken Maus recommended that City staff do additional research regarding what other nearby dog pound facilities charge prior to adjusting the current $7.25 per day charge. After discussion, a motion wad wade by Dan Dlonigan and seconded by Brad Fyle to adjust the monthly compensation for cleaning the pound facilities from $272.50 per month to $300 per month, and increase the animal control service fee from $654 to $700 per month. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of proposal for architectural onaineerinq services for devolopinq long and short-ranqo building requirements and space needs for the public works department. John Simola reported that over the past several months City staff has been preparing site plans outlining options for development of the public works facility located on Golf Course Road. Footprint drawings have been prepared of the existing buildings, and staff has looked at space requirements of existing equipment as well as future needs. In addition, the public works department has looked into the possibility of adding on to the existing masonry public works building along with various combinations of removing the old pole building or lotting it remain. There appear to be a groat number of options in regard to building additions, none of which appear to solve all of our needs. Simola went on to suggest that the City Council enlist the assistance of the engineering firm, TKDA, to assist in selecting a cost-efficient alternative that would address all Pago 3 9 Council Minutes - 7/8/91 of the work study issues. TKDA would also prepare conceptual site and floor plans for an option to be selected by City staff and Council. Simola noted that TKDA has given us an attractive lump sum price of $2,750 for the study with an estimated $150 additional cost for mileage and reproduction costs. This item is also budgeted in the 1991 budget at an amount of $4,500. Ken Maus emphasized the importance of developing a functional facility rather than a hodge podge of unorganized working spaces. In addition, he reviewed the importance of creating a green or site barrier between the public works facility and the adjacent residential area. Dan Blonigen suggested that the City Council and City staff can work together to best determine the needs of the public works department and that an architect will be needed only at such time that the building is designed. The representative from TKDA noted that some of the issues that would be addressed in the study would be 1) the viability of the existing site; is this the proper spot for the location of the public works facilities given the future growth of the community; 2) is it possible to split the public works facility into two locations, one near the industrial park and the other location to remain on Golf Course Road; or 3) maybe an entire new site is the best option given the residential character of the area where the existing public works buildings are located and given the development pattern in the community. Dan Blonigon noted that it's not that complicated. A consultant isn't necessary to determine an answer to the issues noted. He noted he would like to serve on any committee addressing the public works facility issues. Brad Fyle concurred that maybe a committee could adequately address the issues. John Simola responded by saying that the quote submitted by TKDA to do the study is an attractive price, but he is certainly open to addressing the issues via a committee made up of Council and staff. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Ken Maus to table a decision to authorize TKDA to work with City staff toward development of a public works Page 4 9 Council Minutes - 7/8/91 facilities plan and appoint a committee made up of Dan Blonigen, Brad Fyle, and City staff members to review public works facility preliminary issues and report back to Council. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of expansion of City Hall parkinq lot. John Simola reported that at the last meeting it was the consensus of City Council that the preferred parking lot expansion should follow plan #3. Suggestions made were to delete the westerly circular driveway which created the island around the transformer and delete the center island on which the existing locust tree was located. Simola also noted in regard to internal landscape areas or island delineators, the City ordinance requires internal island delineators equal in size to a single parking space and bounded by concrete curbing; and in any parking lot over 5,000 sq ft, the area that was originally on plan #3 around the transformer and locust tree island would have met the ordinance requirements for internally landscaped island delineators, as they were part of the parking lot and were curbed. If all the islands are to be deleted from the parking lot, we would be required to obtain a variance and state Lite non-financial hardship under which the variance should be granted. Council discussed the island delineator issue and indicated that City staff should prepare an ordinance amendment which would eliminate the need for island delineators on smaller parking lots. Ken Maus noted that although the Pratt house directly to the south of City Hall is better than the Cole house, the best parking lot plan and the plan that is in the long-range best interest of the City is to place the lot directly adjacent to the existing parking area per plan #3, which would result in the removal of the Pratt house. In the meantime, the City can consider refurbishing the Cole house. Dan Blonigen noted that he is opposed to taking out the Pratt house to the south; however, he concurred that in terms of parking plans, alternative #3 is the better plan. City Engineer, Bret Weiss, noted that the parking lot project could be combined with the project currently out for bids, which could result in the City obtaining a favorable price. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan Blonigen to adopt alternative #3A. Staff is directed to obtain quotes on the cost to refurbish the Cole Page 5 Council Minutes - 7/8/91 house and to explore options for demolition or moving of the Pratt house and remove the house accordingly. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of improvements or replacement of the Information center/museum/public restrooms. John Simola reported that City Council has asked staff to examine the existing information center/museum building to see if it could be remodeled and added onto with new restrooms to serve as not only the information center but as offices for the Chamber of Commerce. Simola reported that City staff has examined the building site and found that the existing information building is structurally sound and could be added onto. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan Blonigen to develop preliminary plans for constructing office space through demolition of the existing restrooms and refurbishment and remodeling of the information center for use by the Chamber of Commerce. Plans are to be developed with the assistance of an ad hoc committee, including Shirley Anderson and Clint Herbst, with final architectural drawings completed by OSM after the preliminary plans have been approved by Council. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Consideration of concurrence with Wright County to post "no, oarkino" alona Countv Road 117 east of Hiahwav 25. John Simola reported that at the last Council meeting, staff presented information to the City Council regarding Wright County's proposal to post "no parking" signs on County Road 117 just east of Highway 25. Simola noted that staff continues to recommend that "no parking" signs be installed in this area, as parking of large trucks along County Road 117 on the paved shoulders conflicts with the bicycle and pedestrian traffic in the area. John Simola reported that property owners in the area were contacted, and only one of the property owners indicated that the "no parking" signs are not necessary. After discussion, a motion was made by Dan Blonigen and seconded by Brad Fyle to concur with Wright County on the posting of "no parking" along County Road 117 east of Highway 25. Page 6 Council Minutes - 7/8/91 11. Other matters. Ren Maus noted site line problems at certain intersections in the community, most noticeably the intersection of River Street and Sandy Lane. He mentioned that lilac bushes create a site line problem and, therefore, they may need to be trimmed back. Dan Blonigen noted the same problem at Fourth Street and Vine. Ren Maus suggested that the Sheriff's Department look at those intersections and provide input. John Simola reported that he would review the site lines at the intersections and contact property owners affected. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Jeff O'Neill Assistant Administrator Page 7 0-%1 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 Public Hearing and consideration to adopt a resolution relating to the modification, by the Housinq and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello, of the Redevelopment Plan relatinq to Redevelopment Proiect No. 1, the modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plans relatinq to Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-12 and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13, all located within Redevelopment Protect No. It and the approval and adoption of the Tax Increment Financinq Plans relating thereto. (O.K.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The public hearing may be opened by Mayor Ken Maus, as the TIF district and plans (for Shingobee, Inc.) were distributed on June 18, 1991, to the school district, the hospital district, and the Wright County Commissioners to meet the required 30 - day notice for written or oral comments. Also, the City Council having called for this public hearing date upon the request of the HRA, the public hearing notice has appeared in the local newspaper for two consecutive weeks. Gae Veit and/or Tom Golweski, Shingobee, Inc., will present the proposed building and site plans to Council, and Deb Gustafson, BDS, Inc., will be present to respond to any additional TIF questions. This project idea was initiated by the Industrial Development Committee as a creative marketing tool. The marketing development project does not construct a building to sit vacant in the industrial park but reduces the preplan work time for a project by 60 to 90 days, which will enable us to market the plans for a new facility (three optional sizes) at a reduced rental cost available within a time period of actual construction. Preliminary building plans for a 25,000 eq ft, 20,000 sq ft, or 15,000 sq ft manufacturing/offico facility and landscaping/drainage plans have been reviewed by the Building Inspector and OSM, and the TIF creation process will be completed to the point of holding this public hearing. Final building and site plan approval and the actual adoption of the resolution establishing the TIF Plane and District No. 1-13 will not occur until a qualified leasoo is found and thereafter the actual construction of the building will begin. The use of TIF is not and must not be a benefit to the developer but is usod as a carry through to a leaeoe in the form of a rental reduction cost. Rental reduction is Council Agenda - 7/22/91 approximately $.75 per square foot. The project generates increment of approximately $.90 per square foot; however, a $.15 per square foot allowance is being made for the HACA and TIF Penalty. The financing method used in this project is pay-as-you-go and not up front financing; in -other -words, the City will not bond for this project. The developer must have a commitment on Lot B, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park, from the Oakwood Partnership for the duration of the Letter of Intent. The NRA has received the developer's financial statements, a commitment fee of $5,000, and the executed Letter of Intent as drafted by the City Attorney. Upon receiving no negative comments at the public hearing, recommendation is to close the public hearing and for City Council to table the adoption of the resolution until such time as a qualified leasee is found. If the resolution was adopted, this would establish TIF District No. 1-13 and would begin the ten-year life duration of the district; therefore, to maximize the life of the district, the above recommendation is made. With the TIF public hearing for District No. 1-13 closed, the developer and the City can market this lease concept for one year, the duration of the Letter of Intent. Additionally, the Development Agroement between Shingobee, Inc., the leases, and the HRA is being pre -negotiated with actual execution of the document at the time the Council adopts the above resolution. The first draft of the Development Agreement as prepared by Bob Deike, Bradley b Doike, has been reviowed by City staff and mailed to Pat Pelstring, BDS, Inc., and Shingobee, Inc., for consideration prior to HRA approval. S. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. with no negative comments and upon closing the public hearing, adopt tho resolution relating to the above modifications. 2. with no negative comments and upon closing the public hearing, table the adoption of the resolution relating to the above modifications. 3. Upon negative comments at the public hearing, table the consideration to adopt the resolution. 4. Upon negative commonts at the public hearing, deny adoption of the resolution. Council Agenda - 7/22/91 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: With the assumption of no negative comments and upon closing the public hearing, it is recommended that Council table the adoption of the resolution relating to the modifications for establishment of TIF plans and District No. 1-13 until such time a qualified leasee is found (Alternative 92). SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the public hearing notice. Copy of the TIF plan for District No. 1-13, copy of the Letter of Intent, and the preliminary draft of the Development Agreement are available at City Hall. Notices aructural Steel he Monhcollo- ,ill be received ri-ty Hospital A. 1013 Hort 1TMN 55362, i a, Monday. e this date will ed as ..on as el, after which IT of Directors dl be -ado by In' smile hom E. Fridley, MN July i, 1991. ratty Hospit sl I any or all bids ,tanitiea fn the lark 1810S by Monlic 011a 952. 302 MN 55352 For A until I I a. m, tun. 1991, The I notification of '$view 01 Ih. ks. in..ranca l ^hed by the err' ';Co. ugouai r91 r, 1 .iwnoe� .cfatod mnetic- .� stornBe area. net Elomemo,V h the norma and sale of the Raab hand comm of word. "..nod ao. Ab.1-ion, ng ell Inlo"ne. rtcl decumon . ,vicnp N"Frot .w. on July 5. mWndetda fair qumtnn ,nd in IM -fid. ..bes,o.iMbdn- wo pari Par for. r, -mama part in, oQ..l Io one , Contract ptrF.e mint. of this the Bond th.. pats, 1501%l +IY far ins Pay, 1 labra aha ,err• I, COnfrsalM Irt nbammant pro n m r env .Illy f I u.vll Ing, fyafriumu. 1. led conference +. hacatay, Moa,n• rondw Wnctlm of the triol$ must ad fort rima of >,M INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO, 882 MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA CALL FOR BIDS for THIng of OYmnsatum Floor M Plnawood Eon Notice to hereby given ihet seated bids wit! be received by the Board of Education, Irdapen, dent School District No, 882, Sherbunm•Wright C.vriviae, Monticello, Minnesota, 11:00 a.m., August 5. 1991 to, mhllrng the gymnasium nap et Pm - wood Ent Elemontary Schad, according to specifications on file in the office of the Superintendent, Independent School District No. 882, Administrative Office, 302 Washington Sire'. Monticello, Minnesota. Bids will be opened publicly end read aloud in the Cant.,-. Room located in the Administrative Office, Monticello. Minnesota. Spocificnions and bid forma may foe obtairo ad from the Office of Superliner m the Ad• m,nistrativo Office, 302 Washington Sunt, Monticello, Mmmenots, Bids are to be submitted in a sealed envelope eddreand n to the Suapntendent of Schools, Administrative en, Office, P.O. Be. 897, 1, dop dent School District No. 882, Monticello, Min• newts, sed clearly marked on the outside that it h a bid proposal tot •'Refiling". Each bidder moat furnish 5% with each proposal, a cartified Check w bid bond in the amount of the bidmade payable to the Treasu, et or I.depi ndmt School District No. 887, Monticello, Minnesota, to be totiefted as damages In case the proposal be cccap:Cd and the biddy falls to error Into d can tract with the owno, a foils to delivar or vices as spocifled accordingto the In Of than bid apociliea ions. The bid price far the rptiling must include ail neceasmy and incidental erponsas including Installation coat. and a buildsng po,mlt it n.cle,ealy for Comptotlon of mit job. All ..,it on this project must be completed by August 20, 1DOI. with no ascription.. The Board rasa vea in.' r.j-1 any or ell bids and to waive any in o,msiltotln in bids, Det ad al Monticello, Minmeaola, July 4, 11, 1901 BOARD OF EDUCATION tndepmden, Scholl District No. 862 Jun Ilonb,l, Clark 1Juiy 4, 11, 19911 AMENDED NOTICE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR STREETS. UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK FALLON AVENUE CITY PROJECT NO.9601 BRIAR OAKES ESTATE City PROJECT N0.91.02 CARDINAL HILLS CITY PROJECT NO.91 03 FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA NO TICE 18 HERESY GIVEN that opted bldg wolf bo raCefred b11++ the City of Montano n the ."Me of the Clly Clstk until 10.00 i,m. F,dpy, Jut, 111, I Dot M tlr cov Hadi and seal be puMIC- :v opened and n.ad of safe lima ped pipes by rsp e,anl silvan o1 the City of MOntlCsllo, Said popmals for the furrushfeg .1 MI tabor arta} motorist$ la the construction, co nits m PMC. al the follo.1.9 appplO.Imwo qu-11tio.; 6.400L.F, of 8" IO"and 17•'o Wets mod. 0,7011 L.F. Of S" ono 10" PVC Sanllory Sewer 3.100 L.F. of Street Construction 2, 100 L.F. of 12", 15", and 191' RCP Storm Sawa I cit, Slelarn 400 L.F. 0" DIP Forcemain T he bids nun he sutenittad on the popoaal tamp ppvidstt Mactwdafh;e with the Cmtrpct Document., Plan,, ane 9peelf1wOns as prepared by 0-SCh.fan-Mayero. 8 EXWBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF MONTICELLO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNES07A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council title '•Council"I in and for the City of Monticello, County of Wdgnt, State of Min, "sets, will hold a public nearing arra July 32, 1991. at .0woaimateN 7:00 p.m., at CM Hell, 250 East Broadway, Monticello. Minmosots, relating to the proposed modification, by In, creased project costs, me Housing and m Redevolopent Authority'$ RedevoloPmenl Project No. i and the approval end odolation of the Modified Redevelopment Pion relating thereto; tfie Pfapooetl modification, by increased project costs, of the Moaifl d Ter in- crement FinancingPlena for Ta. Incmament Financing Districts Nos. i -i through 1.12, located within Redevelopm.nI Project Na, 1; and me proposed adoption of Is. Inclement Financing Plan retat,,p to Ts: Incraint-I Finan- cing Plen No. L13. also located within Radey.l.pmont Project No. 1, ell pursuant ,a and in eccardonee with Minnesota Statute. Sections 469.001 to 469.047. Inclusive, as a -ended, and Section. 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive. an amended. A copy of the Modified RedevelopmentNan let RedaveWpmiant Project No. 1 and Ta. increment Financing plans lar To. Inc,ement Financing Districts No. t -t through 1.13. as proposed to be adopted M Use office of the City Adminiatrston at City Hall not let., than Jun. 12. 1991, the property comprising Is. Increment Financing District No. 1.13 Is as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 8, stock 2, Oakwood hduatrMt Park, ND NUMBER: 155010-002080 Further Information regarding the dmtlllce- tlon ot the petal to be InclutlW In lei Incr:� m ent Financing District No. 1-11 may be obtoinsd from the olllca of the City Ad. minintretw. An Wonted Poro may piper a"hs - Mg end poo -t their to.. erdly or In writing. Doted: Juts B. 1901 By ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL lot Rick Woltah.11n, City Adminlsb alp Uuty it. to, 1994. REOt#9T FON am DOnllpalw'n titled PrepOnlit fp the 1901 Monticello �ccello y a � aim win rdMpa.dem lac DlsirCt No. 082. Monlkcstb, Mlmulots. until 11;00 a.m., Wednesday, Judy 11. 1991, at the allies of the Supadmwdant of Schoch, in Mpdicabo. Minnesota, in OCCwdarKe with the plins end ppaciflcatloN oipared by AWMroth. Rego 8 ov101111ceuu school board proceedings A opectal maetf.g of it. Board of Education of i>depinden, School District No. Be 2. Mon. ticello, Minnesota wee held on Monday even. ing, Jwro 24, 1991. TM meeting waa Called to order at 7:30 Orn. by Board Chair N,ncv Cassano with the fonowlrne board members in attendance: Cassano, Hvrbet, VanOeii, Swinehart• Holloway, Haval and Suparinten• dent S 0. Johnson. Administrators present: Wei... 6enedetm. SOm en. Daughter. Votck., Scx*. Gate, WNte and Novak. Other. pr ant; Thor Carlson. Monticello Timet Kathy Figem .hour newly enacted School board membra; and other observers. Citizens Comments: None The Consent Agenda was approved on a me. lion ,Ubm;lted by Herbal: i, Approval of Minutes Ru 1ep99l1er Meeting, Board of Education. June 8, 2. Maternity Leave Request: Nan Mumb:ow. Special Education Coor• dinstor; commencing August 28, 1991 and continuing until she is cortilled to return by her Physician. J. Teacher Resignation: Krispn Stoho, SPOC41Education Hearing Im. peied Instructor. The nation to approve the Consent Agenda vo IMted wait atconded by VanDell, with all voting eye: -oil on carried, M die School Scisnce instructor Jeff Own, won appeared before the Bawd of Education fair the purpose of demonstmting a rec.ntly our - .hand place of audio"NWai f.cheiopy equip. mem that has been used in the :IddlO school aciptce dtwwtmanl, all wen ss other *"It, -ants this 01111% V681. The Computerized video equipment was demonstrated using a science lesson that showed detenoe-Chwdimo and common Characteristics of insects, bird. and ardmels. Mr. Bwdwdl domon.tated the varous adymta$e of using this piece of aqudp-em A. lesson. In .dance its 18u9hl. Spm. of these edrantage era as follows: noel and atop choactarintkp; ability to change speedy reran sing the machine; and $Day scan. t. over 50.000 piece. of Information *fixed an ow computer die. AT the conclusion of the c no ntadon, Ante. tart S Omf t.rndar tAmi,p tin Mr. Oneeletto Indicated that the sChool district block grant money, In the amount of approximately i 1 t.ODO. win bo nand to PleChes. onadd,flan.1 ,is machines for the school district this veer. It le a goal of the schood dlstrkt to purchase ad• ditional video prasentstion units until a aufff• Clar t number he. been Procured for our silo dlpblct. Dowd memb as eapes.d Their In"$ to Mr. BPrdwsll lar his pesentttlon end applauded his un, of state of the art technology within the middle school .circa. department. Suparinlendenl Johnson discussed with m4snbw8 of the Board of Education a request from Instructor Gregg Horme,dirg to return from unOslo leay. of absence. M. HOnmanyMed to rerot the Time lino of May, 1 In submitting his raqueat 10 return from his I"" Of absence akW* Ns taRar sen dated May 7, 1091 and reached the school district office on Msy 15, 1901. Dui to the fact that metals ipsr wit vbi.ted snit beceuas Mr. ".rustling has holm Sri exemplary ln.11-101 0 the Mon. IW44o School District. Board Mamba Swkrnrt msvid to est isle the M.Y I deadline, =,Io,0ot11 Nm u an bnsbuMtY N the ..lo commvwhv with The t 801.92 scrape{ Trans, Thi motkon hither stated that this war net • PIOCedml "ItkV action by tM Dend at Educatbn. Bond minion Havel ed Pse mollon, with O9 voting aye; ma, Crannied uninimawply. AMpalM.. Sonja Mr. With• @will %its cIn$dropt MCipal Mr. Bonier riv4wed e.oecwrkuhr esilgnnMrrie fw the 1991.92 schoolyip. The sa i�mnmf list Indicates w1dch poottMne al , both site cuniculn elldallt -so ron•ithletig nro► have beds filled and which ansa rtmal& vacant ill rr the Curran time, Upon cumpfatdn Council Agenda - 7/22/91 Consideration of issuinq a negative declaration, Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. (J.O.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to review responses to the Cardinal Hills EAW published on June 10, 1991, and consider declaring that the environmental effects of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision are minimal and preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not necessary. In accordance with state statutes, an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) was prepared for the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. Notice of the EAW was printed in the Environmental Quality Board "Monitor" on June 10, 1991, which is a publication that goes to numerous local, state, and federal agencies. The EAW was also distributed to all persons on the Minnesota Environmental Review Program. In response to the EAW, the City received questions and comments from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The questions and City responses are attached. You will note that the questions and comments provided by the PCA and DNR do not appear to raise Issues that justify the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement. The City also received a letter from the State Historical Society which commented on the plan but did not object to the project or ask further questions. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to declare that the environmental impacts of the jP Cardinal Hills residential subdivision are minimal based on the findings noted in the EAW and based on the input provided by other agencies via the EAW process. \1v Therefore, preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary. Under this alternative, the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision development could proceed without preparation of an EIS. Motion declaring that an environmental problem will or may be created as a result of this development. Direct preparation of an EIS before further approval may be granted. Council Agenda - 7/22/91 If Council is not sure that the EAW and City responses to additional questions from the PCA clearly answer or address environmental issues relating to Cardinal Hills, then this option should be selected. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 91. The comments and questions provided by the DNR and PCA have been helpful and do not raise significant issues that can only be addressed via an EIS. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Comments from PCA and DNR; City response to comments and questions; Letter from Historical Society. 5 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-3898 Q Telephone (612) 296-6300 July 3, 1991 Mr. Jeff O'Neill Assistant Administrator 250 East Broadway Monticello, Minnesota 55362-9245 Dear Mr. O'Neill: RE: Residential Subdivision --Cardinal Hills, Monticello, Minnesota Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed residential subdivision in Monticello. Based on the information contained in the EAW, the Environmental Analysts Office staff believes that significant environmental impacts are not likely to occur as a result of this project. The preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), therefore, does not appear warranted. We do have comments, however, concerning the proposed project. 1. Regarding Question 9, land use; is the surrounding land used for agricultural purposes or are there other significant land uses? The EAW is not clear whether the site is currently zoned for residential huusing. 2. Regarding Question 11, fish, wildlife, and ecologically sensitive resources; what other habitats exist on and near the site besides the wetlands? According to the aerial photngrnph and topographic mnps Included with the EAW, there are woodlots and wetlands located near the site. 3. Regarding Question 12, physical Impacts on water resources; the EAW discusses existing ponds on the site that will be slightly modified/excnvated. Does this refer to the wetlands on the site or to actual surface water ponds on the site? If wetlands are mad ified!excncated, a permit may be needed from the Army Corps of Engineers and a certification from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MCPA). This Issue should be clarified in the response to comments. Iluw will the on-site wetlands be protected from sedimentation Impacts thnt could result during and niter project consrtuctfon? if there are wetland impacts, either by removal of wetlands or by degradntion of wetland quality, mitigation efforts should be described. 4. Regarding Question 16, soils; no informntion is provided on the local soils or the depth to bedrock. This Information should be discussed in the response to comments. Regional 011icos: Duluth • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Marshall • Rochester / 7 Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on Recycled Paper �/ Mr. Jeff O'Neill Page 2 5. Regarding Question 18, surface water run-off; the project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for storm water run-off after November 1991. Please check with Lou Flynn (612-296-9268) in the MPCA's Yater Quality Division to determine if a permit is required for your project. 6. Regarding Question 26, prime or unique farmlands; are any of the 80 acres of farmland that will be lost as a result of the project classified as "prime" farmland? We look forward to receiving your responses to our comments and your decision on the need for an EIS. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact Paul Schmiechen of my staff at (612) 296-7795. Sincerely, Paul HoEgqt— Director Environmental Analysis Office Environmental Support Division PH:ns 0 �nr�S TAATE OF IN UV LS ��U6% DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 500 LAFAYEITE ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155-40 1(1 ONR INFORMATION (612) 2064137 July 2, 1991 Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362-9245 RE: Cardinal Hills Residential Subdivision, Monticello, MN Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Dear Mr. O'Neill: The Department of Natural Resources has reviewed the EAW for the proposed Cardinal Hills Residential Subdivision. We offer the following comments for your consideration. Concerning Item 12 of the EAW, which relates to impacts on water resources, we support the inclusion of retention basins as pan of the project. However, modification of existing wetlands to enhance their flood storage/water treatment capabilities often reduces their value for wildlife. By leaving the existing wetlands in their present condition and constructing dedicated retention basins, the loss of habitat can be largely avoided, and the overall on-site water retention and treatment capabilities will be further enhanced. If it is not possible to completely avoid altcrvtion of the existing wetlands, the loss of wildlife habitat value can be minimized by incorporating the following suggestions into the retention pond design: Use an irregularly shaped shoreline, which will create greater diversity. 2. Gradual (10:1) slopes should be used around the perimeter of the basin to encourage the growth of emergent aquatic Plants. Aquatic plants provide wildlife habitat and enhance wntrr treatment capability. 3. Organic material from the existin wetlands should be stockpiled prior to regrading and used to line the basins following construction. This will provide a seed source for aquatic vegetation and hasten the establishment of a productive aquatic ecosystem The City and the project proposer should also be aware that placement of Fill in the existing wetlands, even if associated with regrading, may require a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Thank you for the opportunity to review this EAW. From a natural resources perspective, and based on the information contained in the EAW, the project does not appear to require preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER (D Jeff O Neill July 2, 1991 Page 2 We look forward to receiving your record of decision and responses to our comments, pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, subparts 4 & 5. Please contact Rebecca Wooden of my staff, at (612)297-3355, if you have questions teganding our comments. Sincerely, Thomas W. Balcom, Supervisor Natural Resources Planning and Review Section Office of Planning Bob Hance Tom Lutgen Steve Colvin Gregg Downing, EQB Lynn M. Lewis, USFWS Tom Holthaus, Value Plus Homes 0910246-01 EQB I Xardinal.doc 0 0S& Or2071 31. Hennepin Avenue Schelen Mlnneapolrs, MN 55413 Enginett May"°°° FAX 33 Bb60 PUnn—$ Memorandum ASSOOdIt5, U1C FA%JJI-180b Planners TO: Honorable Mayor and Council City of Monticello FROM: Jeff O'Neill, Assistant City Administrator, City of Monticello Bret A. Weiss, P.E., Project Engineer, OSPI & Associates, Inc - DATE: July 16, 1991 SUBJECT: Comments Received on the EAW - Cardinal Hills The 30 -day comment period on the EAW for the above referenced project has elapsed with remarks being received from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and the Minnesota Historical Society (MHS). The responses to the appropriate questions are as follows: Question 9: The existing site is currently zoned agricultural, but will be (MPCA) rezoned R1- residential low density upon favorable response to the EAW. The entire surrounding area has been used for agricultural purposes, but is located near developed areas and is slated for residential use in the long range comprehensive plan. Question It: The property has been used for agricultural purposes including (MPCA) cropland and pasture. The wetlands on the site consist of man- made cattle ponds and natural low land that is inundated during the rainy season. The wooded areas consist of staggered trees with no heavy forestation. The trees will be maintained as much as reasonably possible. The area around the trees is typically used for pasture. Question 12: The on-site wetlands are primarily cattle ponds and natural low (MPCA. DNR) land that is inundated during the rainy season. The existing low land areas are proposed to he utilized as stormwater detention basins for the completed subdivision. The low lands in question are not affected by the initial phase of development, however, subsequent phases will be processed through the appropriate government agencies for approval. The mitigation suggestions from the DNR will be incorporated as much as reasonably possible. Irregularly shaped shorelines and gradual slopes are difficult to incorporate into a small detention pond, but every effort will be made to accommodate the suggestions. 0 Memorandum July 16, 1991 Page 2 Question 16: The soil conditions of the site consist of topsoil within 1 to 1- (MPCA) 1/2 feet of the surface with silty sand and sandy clay underneath. The borings were extended to a depth exceeding 26 feet with no ground water or bedrock influence. Question 18: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) (MPCA) permit is currently only required for communities larger than 100,000 population and industrial use facilities. The proposed project does not qualify based on these standards. Question 26: The farmland that is to be lost as a result of this project is not (MPCA) currently classified as "prime". The MHS agreed that appropriate measures should be taken to avoid any impact with Helm's Cemetery. Based on the comments received, we feel the project does not require an EIS and can proceed as proposed. Copies of the cuuuncnls received arc attached rul your information. /cmw 0716-hm&c Enclosure LM� J�IFCIUNDED IN 1849 July 2, 1991 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Fort Snelling Hntory Center, SI, Paul, MN SS I l I e 161217261171 RECEIVED OfhSche rn-tYayemn & Ass3c. comm. # Mr. Bret A. Weiss Orr Schelen Mayeron 6 Associates, Inc. JUL 03 1991 2021 East Hennepin Avenue _ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 j Hut:b � '� un Bare Fi,d(. 7 Dear Mr. Weiss: rMI11 I I 1 I Re: Residential Subdivision, Cardinal Hills, Monticello, Wright County S/2 SE/4 6 SW/4 S13, T121, R25 MHS Referral File Number: 91-1650 Thank you for providing this office a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the above -referenced project. It has been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities given to the Minnesota Historical Society by the Minnesota Historic Sites Act and the Minnesota Field Archaeology Act and through the process outlined in Minnesota Rules 4410.1600. There are no properties in the project area that are listed on the National Register of Hiotoric Platen or included in our inventory. In the abaonce of reported properties, we have also evaluated the likelihood that unreported historic or archaeological proportion may be present. Although we cannot state with certainty that there are no significant unreported historical or archaeological properties within the project area, we feel that the probabil- ity of such properties being present in low. Therefore, in our opinion, the "no" response to question 26a is appropriate. As you indicate, appropriate measures should be taken to avoid any impact on the adjacent Helm's Cemetery. Please note that this cement letter does not address the requirements of Sec- tion 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFR800. Pro- cedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the protection of hisrnr.ie properties. If this project is considered for federal aaniotanco, it should be submitted to our office with reference to the assisting federal agency. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding our review of this project. Sincerely. A V�(uV v Dennis A. Cimestad Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DAC:dmb 0 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 6. Consideration of approvinq developer's agreement ooverninq City/developer installed improvements --Cardinal Hills Phase I. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Attached is a proposed City/developer agreement which outlines the various terms and agreements associated with development of phase I of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. This agreement is very similar to the Briar Oakes development agreement recently approved by Council. The main difference between the two agreements is the method by which the City is securing payment of the assessments. Under the Briar Oakes agreement, the developer provides the City with 60% of the total cost of the project in the form of a letter of credit, which the City can draw on if the developer fails to make annual assessment installments. Each lot is assessed its share of the total cost of the project, and one lot is released with each assessment payment that is made. This agreement differs in that the Value Plus developers will be providing 40% of the total cost of the project in the form of a letter of credit and will be providing the City 1-1/2 times the value of a single lot each time a home is developed. The surplus funds collected through payment of 1.5 times the value of each lot will be kept in a separate account, which will accumulate until such time that enough funds have been collected in this account to finance the payment of the combined assessment balance. In summary, the City's financial position is completely secured after 13 of the 24 lots are sold. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt developer's agreement for City/developer installed improvements --Cardinal Hills Phase I. n ,• Under this alternative, the development will move 3' forward, and the City will be in position to accept bids and award the related project. 2. Motion to deny approval of developer's agreement governing City/developer installed improvements --Cardinal Hills Phase I. If Council is not satisfied with the terms of this agreement or if, for some reason, Value Plus developers indicate that they are not able to comply with the terms noted, then Council may wish to select this alternative. Council Agenda - 7/22/91 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the agreement. It is our view that the security arrangements are sufficient to protect the City. The terms in the agreement are consistent with the Briar Oakes agreement. Subsequent to the bid opening on Friday, July 19, at 10:00 a.m., City staff and the Value Plus developers will be executing the development agreement. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the proposed development agreement with sections that differ from the Briar Oakes development agreement highlighted. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT CITY/DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS CARDINAL HILLS PHASE I THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of 1991, by and between Value Plus Homes of Monticello, Inc. referred to herein as "Developer," and the City of Monticello, a municipal corporation in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "City"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the fee owner and developer of a parcel or parcels of land described in Exhibit A ("subject property"), and which property is proposed to be developed bearing the name Cardinal Hills Phase 1; and WHEREAS, the City requires that certain public improvements, which are herein referred to as "Petition Items," including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and streets, be installed by City to serve the development, all at the expense of the Developer; and WHEREAS, the City further requires that certain on and off-site improvements be installed by the Developer within the subject property, which improvement typically consists of boulevard sod or seed, trees, and drainage swales, and which improvements to the subject property shall be referred to herein as "escrow items"; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into for the purpose of setting forth and memorializing for the parties and subsequent owners the understandings and agreements of the parties concerning the development of the subject property; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AND HEREIN MUTUALLY AGREED, in consideration of each party's promises and considerations herein set forth, as follows: 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for Cardinal Hills Phase I, a 24 - lot single family subdivision (also referred to in this Agreement as the "plat") of the land legally described as: Soo Exhibit A. 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City agrees to approve the plat on the condition (1) that the Developer enter into this Agreement; (2) that the Developer provide the VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Pago 1 9 necessary security in accordance with the terms of this Agreement guarantying the payment of the special assessments herein, including interest and principal, for public improvements and guarantying compliance of the terms of this Agreement; (3) the Developer obtains approval of the final plat ir, accordance with City rules and ordinances and files the same along with the Wright County Recorder no later than August 1, 1991; (4) As of 6/19/91, the Developer has delivered cash deposits in the amount of $11,000 to City to be utilized for all expenses incurred by City associated with making preparations for installation of petition items A and B as outlined in Exhibit B. On the date of the commencement of the work on petition items, the cash deposit shall be returned to Developer. Expenses associated with petition items and which are covered by the cash deposit shall be incorporated into the total cost to install petition A improvements and assessed against the lots platted with phase I of the Cardinal Rills plat. In the event the Developer fails to satisfy conditions 1, 2, and 3 herein, City may draw on the cash deposit to satisfy all existing costs incurred in connection herewith. Without waiving any rights or remedies, it is entitled under the terms of this Agreement. Effect of Plat Approval. For throe (3) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City's comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development, density, lot size, lot layout, or dedications or platting required or permitted by the approved preliminary plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's comprehensive plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement and may require submission of a new plat. Use and Density. The plat shall allow a maximum of 24 single family lots. The plat must show all necessary street and roadway easements and shall be subject to the roview and approval of the City Engineer and, if applicable, the Wright County Traffic Engineor. VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Page 2 9 Petition Items A and B (City Installed Items). Subject to the performance by Developer of the covenants contained in paragraph 2, City agrees to construct as part of an improvement project the petition items A and B as detailed on Exhibit B pursuant to its regular method of making improvements. City shall commence work on the petition items A and B within sixty (60) days of the Developer's compliance with paragraph 2 and shall use its best efforts to complete the improvements in a prompt manner, subject to delays beyond its control. Petition Items A - Cardinal Hills Public Improvements. Assessment of Costs. Developer agrees that City shall assess the cost of petition items A together with administrative planning, engineering, capitalized interest, legal, and bonding costs against the entire plat in the estimated amount of $223,190 to be assessed equally against each lot developed with phase I improvements. The assessment shall be deemed adopted by the City on the date that construction co enced. The assessments shall be paid over a ive- ea period, without deferment, together with interest a a rate set by the City. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation of the public improvements and the assessments, including notice and hearing and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefits to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081. Nothing contained herein shall prevent the developers from prepaying the assessments in whole or in part. Petition Items B - Lift Station/Sanitary Sewer. Pre- payment of Costs. The Developer understands that the cost to install improvements under petition items B shall not be assessed against lots platted with Cardinal Hills Phase I. Furthermore, Developer agrees to provide the City with a letter of credit in an amount equal to the cost to install petition items B to be available for draw to pay for lift station expenses as they become due. The cost to install petition items B shall be determined via the public bidding process. If at the completion of the project it is determined that the amount of the VPDEVEL.ACR: 7/19/91 Page 3 letter of credit is less than the full cost of the petition item B improvements, the Developer shall pay the difference. Trunk Sewer - Payment of Area Assessment for Trunk Sewer and Water. The development shall be subject to the area assessment policy of the City for trunk sewer, which, according to the present policy and formula for calculating the area assessment, requires the payment of an amount equal to a $1,250 per acre times the approximate number of acres benefitted by sewer service. For calculation purposes, acreage includes residential lots, park lands, and streets. Said assessment shall be paid by the collection over time of a $500 per lot trunk sewer fee. This fee shall be collected prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the City. ¢v2 CQ Items (Developer Installed Items). The Developer shall pay for and install the following improvements: See attached Exhibit It -8 The improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standards, ordinances, plans, and specifications, which have been prepared by a the the City Engineer. The City shall instruct the engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control. The Developer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council Chambers with all parties concerned, including City staff, to review the program for construction work. The Developer shall complete the grading and excavation associated with roadbed preparation by August 15, 1991, and complete the remainder of the work required by this paragraph by October 15, 1991. The date required for completion will be extended for a period equal to the time lost due to delays reasonably beyond the control of the Developer. Such delays shall include delays causod by fire, flood, labor disputes, epidemics, weather conditions, material or oquipmont shortages, or acts of God. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City for other causes, which extension shall be granted at the reasonable discretion of the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost incroases, if any. VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Page 4 0 Grading Plan. The plat shall be graded and drainage provided by the Developer in accordance with a grading plan to control drainage and erosion. Any drainage or flooding problems and property damage onto adjacent properties resulting from the development of the subject property shall be the responsibility of the Developer for the correction of any said damages, including total costs of correction and compensation to those properties affected. As the development progresses, the City may impose additional erosion control requirements if, in the opinion of the City Engineer, they are necessary to prevent damage to adjacent properties or to prevent unreasonable erosion. The Developer shall comply with the drainage and erosion control plans and with any such additional instructions it receives from the City. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operation shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Seed shall be rye grass or other fast-growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seed areas shall be mulched and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognized that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. Landscaping. Boulevard Grass. Tho Dovolopor shall sod or seed all boulevard areas improved with phase I of the development. Sodding or seeding shall be done upon completion of the public improvements. Maintenance of the grass in the boulevard areas shall be the responsibility of the Developer. Private Lawns. Sodding and seeding of yard areas are the responsibility of the proporty owner. Trees. Developer shall plant trees as follows: (1) Number. At least one tree shall be planted in the front yard of each property located entirely on a cul-de- sac. For all other lots, at least two trees shall be planted in the front yard; (2) Planting Location. Trees shall be planted inside the front property line at a distance not greater than four feet (4') from such line. This tree is to be planted if there are no suitable existing trees in this location; (3) Required subdivision trees must havo a trunk diameter of at least VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Pago 5 9 two inches (2") at one foot (1') above the ground; (4) Not less than two (2) or more than three (3) species of trees shall be planted in any block and neither less than twenty percent (20%) nor more than fifty percent (50%) of the total trees planted in a block may be of the same species. Species proposed by the Developer shall be approved by the City Tree Inspector; (5) Trees must be protected and supported by tree guards of approved type; (6) No required subdivision tree shall be planted in soil too poor to insure the growth of such tree unless twenty- seven (27) cubic feet (3'x3'x3') of soil is removed and replaced with suitable loam; (7) Tree Planting Timing. Trees shall be planted on individual lots after a building permit has been issued and before issuance of the occupancy permit. This requirement shall not apply to homes that are constructed and otherwise eligible for Certificates of Occupancy between the months of November and April or from July 1 through August 15 when high temperatures might threaten tree viability. In such circumstances, Developer warrants that the requirements of this paragraph shall be completed as soon as reasonably possible after April 1. 10. Warranty. The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of one (1) year after its completion and acceptance by the City. All grass and sod supplied or planted by Developer shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free for twelve (12) months after planting. Any replacements shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. All trees purchased by Developer shall be warranted by the supplier for a period of twelve (12) months. Developer shall assign said warranties to City following the purchase thereof. The warranties and securities required by this paragraph shall terminate as to each parcel at the time of conveyance of each parcel to a subsequent owner. 11. License. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers, and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all necessary work and/or inspections deemed appropriate by the City during the installation of petition items by City and essow items by Developer. The license shall expire aft4r all improvements installed pursuant to this dove lopmentl contract have been installed and accepted by the City. L �wa�cPt t VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Page 6 O 12. Ownership of Improvements. Upon the completion of the work and construction required to be done by this Agreement, the public_ improvements lying within public easement shall become City property without further notice or action. 13. Security for Improvements. As and for partial security for the unpaid assessments and other work required under the terms of this agreement, Developer shall furnish the City with (3) irrevocable letters of credit. All three shall remain in full force and effect until released as provided herein. Irrevocable Letter of Credit - A shall be furnished to City in the amount of $89,276 or 40% of the cost to install petition items A required by paragraph 5. In the event the letter of credit must be renewed on an annual basis, Developer shall cause the bank issuing the letter of credit to advise City no less than thirty (30) days prior to the date of the stated renewal date that the bank will renew the letter of credit under the same terms and conditions. In the event City does not receive such assurances from the bank within thirty (30) days of the date of its renewal date, Developer will be in default under its obligations to City herein, and City shall be entitled to draw against said letter of credit for its entire stated amount. If any installment of special assessmonts is not paid when due and in any event before any penalty is attached, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay off the balance due on the delinquent installment. Irrevocable letter of Credit - B The Developer understands that the cost to install improvements under petition items B shall not be assessed D gainst lots platted with Cardinal Hills Phase I. Furthermore, Developer agrees to provide the City with a letter of credit with an expiration date no earlier than ecember 31, 1991, in an amount equal to the cost to install petition items B to be available for draw to pay for lift station expenses as they become due. The amount of the letter of credit - B is If at the completion of the project it is determined that the amount of the letter of credit is less than the full cost of the petition item B improvements, the Developer shall pay the difference. VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Pago 7 0 Irrevocable letter of Credit - C in the amount of shall be utilized primarily to insure performance of the items described in paragraphs 7 through 9 and outlined in Exhibit D. With City approval, the letter of credit may be written down from time to time upon completion and payment in full of the specific obligations as detailed in said paragraphs 7 through 9 and outlined in Exhibit C. The City Engineer shall determine, at his sole discretion, if the obligation has been completed in accordance with the terms of this agreement and the amount of reduction in the letter of credit fund, if any. 14. Release of Lots. The City shall release a lot as designated by Developer if all principal and interest assessed against said lot is paid in full and if an additional amount equal to one half the per -lot assessment amount is paid to the City. The original principal amount assessed against each lot shall be an amount equal to the total cost of petition items A divided by 24. Funds paid to the City in addition to the assessed amount shall be held by the City in a separate surplus payment fund and shall be released to pay assessments against individual lots at such time that the ` A accumulated fund balance is equal to the combined balance of assessments against individual lots. Surety Deficiency. In the event that any cash, corporate surety bond, letter of credit, or other surety referred to herein is ever utilized and found to be deficient in amount to pay or reimburse the City in total as required herein, the Developer agrees that upon being billed by the City, Developer wil pay within thirty (30) days of receipt of said billing the said deficient amount. If there should be an overage in the amount of utilized security, the City upon making said determination shall refund to the Developer any monies which the City has in its possession which are in excess of the actual costs of the project as paid by the City. All monies deposited within the City shall be used by the City at the City's discretion to defray the City's costs and expenses connected with the project. 16. Responsibility For Costs. A. Except as otherwise specified heroin, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including, but not limited to, legal, planning, engineering, and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Pago 8 C09 plat, the preparation of this contract, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction, including, but not limited to, the release of lots after sale and the issuance of building permits, until the bills are paid in full, or apply to the letters of credit as described herein. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and/or third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred to public or private property or injury to persons resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. This indemnification shall not extend to costs attributable to the City's own negligence or that of its agents or employees. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all damage to property of Developer incurred in connection with the escrow items performed by Developer. D. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. 17. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it or any of its obligations hereunder, the City may, at its option, in addition to any other remedies available to it, suspend its performance duties under this Agreement, enjoin the dofault by court order, or perform the work or obligation required of Developer. In the event City acts to perform the work obligation, the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, or the City may, at its option, draw on the escrow account as provided for by this Agreement provided the Developer is first given VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Pago 9 v written notice of the work or obligation in default, not less than 48 hours in advance in the event the default constitutes an emergency. For the purposes of this paragraph, an emergency is defined as a condition which presents an imminent hazard to the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of city. For defaults which are of a non -emergency nature, the Developer shall be given ten (10) days prior written notice. This Agreement is a license of the City to act, avid it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may apply to the escrow account for reimbursement, or, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. The Developer, its successors and assigns as well as future lot purchasers, waive all procedural and substantive objections to the improvements and special assessments, including, but not limited to, any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property, that proper notices have not been given, and that the method of spreading the assessment is erroneous, as well as any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A., Section 429.081. 18. Clean Up. Developer shall promptly clear from public streets and property any soil, earth, or debris resulting from construction work performed by the Developer, its agents or assigns. The City shall promptly clean debris from city atreets and from the plat any soil, earth, or debris resulting from construction work performed by or on behalf of the City. 19. Park dedication. The developer shall deposit with the City a certified check in the amount of $2,000 which represents 10% of the raw value of the entire area dovoloped with phase I. This amount also equals the value of one acre of raw land. It is understood that this amount plus interest accrued may be used by the City to purchase a like amount of land from the Developer for park purposes in conjunction with development of subsequont phases of the Cardinal Hills subdivison. 20. School Boulevard. The developer understands that a roadway will be extended along the combined northern boundaries of phase I and the remaining 99 -acre parcel. The dovoloper further recognizes that the City will not assess parcols dovoloped with phase I for school boulevard improvements because benefit cannot be demonstratod. The developer agrees that development of school boulevard provides the entire 109 -acre parcel with a benefit; and developer agrees that at such time the VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Page 10 9 roadway is necessary, one half of the cost not attributed to oversizing shall be assessed to the portion of the original parcel that remains undeveloped. 21. Miscellaneous. A. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors or assigns, as the case may be. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against any party under this Agreement. C. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including all or part of said plat sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. E. So long as the City uses its best efforts to construct the petition items, Developer agrees to assume the risk of damage to Developer attributable to any delays in completing the petition items. F. No one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until sanitary sewer and water lines have been installed, hooked up, tested, and approved by the City, and until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface. G. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties, and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. H. Developer shall reimburse the City for all expenses, including staff time and attorneys' fees, that the City incurs in connection with the preparation of the environmental assessment worksheet. VPUEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Page 11 9 I. Future residents of the plat shall not be deemed to be third -party beneficiaries of this Agreement. J. The Developer represents to the City that to the best of Developer's knowledge, the plat complies with all city, county, state, and federal laws and regulations including, but not limited to, subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. if the City subsequently determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow any construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease until there is compliance. K. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title of the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Agreement, at the Developer's request the City will execute and deliver to the Developer a release which shall be in recordable form. L. Each right, power, or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and, in addition to every other right, power, or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the City, at law or in equity, power, and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing, may be exercised from time to time as often or and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power, or remedy. 22. The City agrees to pursue devolopmont of an ordinance amendment that would enable the City to recover a portion of the Fallon Avenue utilities construction cost through establishment of a utilities access charge. All funds collected (less City costs) shall be passed through to the VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Page 12 0 23. Agreement Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. CITY OF MOA'TICELLO VALUE PLUS HOMES, INC., OF MONTICELLO By: By: Kenneth Maus, Mayor Thomas Holthaus By: By: Rick Wolfsteller Stephen Holker City Administrator By: Matthew Holker VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Page 13 9 STATE OF MINNESOTA) CITY OF MONTICELLO) SS COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) On this day of , 1991, before me personally appeared Kenneth Maus and Rick Wolfsteller to me known to be the persons described in the foregoing instrument and who aid say they are respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the municipal corporation named therein and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its City Council, and said Kenneth Maus and Rick Wolfsteller acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) SS On this day of 1991, before me personally appeared to me known to be the persons described in the foregoing instrument and who did say they are partners of the corporation name therein, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its partners and said partners acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Public VPDEVEL.AGR: 7/19/91 Page 146 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 Consideration of a preliminary and final plat reQuest entitled Phase I of Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. Applicant, Value Plus Homes. P.O.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat of Phase I Cardinal Hills residential subdivision and recommends that Council approve the preliminary plat. Please review alternative it for more detail regarding the Planning Commission's recommendation. Council is asked to review the preliminary plat of phase I of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. Phase I includes development of 24 lots on 10 acres of land located directly south of the proposed elementary school site and adjacent to Fallon Avenue. Phase I represents 108 of the total area to be developed by the Value Plus developers. The remaining 908 of the Cardinal Hills subdivision area will be platted at a later date. A sketch plan has been provided, however, that shows a possible layout for the future development area. The focus of Council review of the 109 -acre Cardinal Hills residential subdivision is on phase I. The developers have requested that the development pattern proposed for the balance of the property be refined with the help of the Planning Commission during the winter months. The City Engineer and City staff are making sure that the utility installations associated with phase I will integrate with any potential design that might be proposed for future plat development. The Value Plus development plan calls for marketing homes to the first-time home buyer market. It is likely that a large number of the homes developed at this site will be financed through the FHA housing program, which limits the price of homes to $70,000. SITE PLAN REVIEW City staff has reviewed the lot configuration and found that all lots moot the minimum lot size and lot frontage requirements. There are, however, a number of lots that have street frontage on both the front and rear yard areae. Given the configuration of the original parcel, it does not appear feasible to develop this property at an acceptable density level without having lots with street frontage on both sides. The City Engineer will be making an effort to devise a grading plan that mitigates the impact of the collector road abutting the rear lot lines. Council Agenda - 7/22/91 ADJOINING LAND USES To the north of the site is the proposed school boulevard, which will become the major east/west artery along the southern section of the community. This boulevard will become a buffer between the school use to the north and the residential use to the south. The first phase of Cardinal Hills will not have a direct pedestrian route to the elementary school to the north. It is proposed that as part of subsequent development a pedestrian crossing be developed at some location east of phase I, which would tie into a sidewalk system running along the north side of the proposed school boulevard. Unfortunately, until subsequent phases develop, pedestrian access to the school from phase I residences will be indirect and require walking on Fallon Avenue or will require cutting through lots that make up the northern border of the development. To the south of the site is the John Leersen property, which appears to consist of a small dairy farm. It is hoped that the potential conflict between residential uses and farm uses will be minimal. Leerson attended the Planning Commission meeting and noted that he did not object to the plat as long as the development does not create additional storm water impact on his property. To the east of phase I is the balance of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. As noted earlier, the sketch plan has been prepared; however, this sketch plan provides a very preliminary concept on how the balance of the property should be developed. Planning Commission and the Parke Commission will be working closely with the developer toward completion of a sketch plan that is consistent with the City's plans and integrates with school district facilities planning to the north. To the wort of the site is the Francis Klein property, which is located in the township. There do not appear to be any land -use conflicts associated with the agricultural uses at the Klein site. PUBLIC UTILITIES Storm Water Manaqemont The storm water and grading plan calls for maintaining all storm water run-off on the property owned by the Value Plus developers. Phase I storm water will be conveyed to the pond system located southeast of phase I. The added run-off created by this development will not impact the pond on the Council Agenda - 7/22/91 John Leersen property; therefore, there will be no impact on township property associated with storm water run-off with phase I development. Sanitary Sewer A lift station will oe instailed that wiil pump sewage Lo a gravity system that serves the school district property. The sewer system will be set at an elevation that will allow future connection to a trunk line that will be extended at some point in the future. The Value Plus developers are paying the full cost to install what should be considered to be a short-term utility system. In addition, with each building permit issued, the Value Plus developers will be paying a surcharge of approximately $500, which will be deposited in a fund to be used to assist in financing the future trunk line. Water System The development will gain access to the water system via a 12 -inch water line being extendad along with the Fallon Avenue improvements associated with the development of the elementary school. The water line will be extended the full length of the western boundary of phase I. Streets The internal streets named Martin and Starling will be designed to meet all City standards. Fallon Avenue will not be improved with phase I; however, it should be noted that it is likely within the next five years that Fallon Avenue will be upgraded. At this time, a small knoll north of the entranco to phaso I will be removed, which will improve sight lines. 1f you visit the site, you will note that the visibility of the entrance to the development could be improved by reducing the grade of Fallon Avenue at a point just north of the entrance to the development. School boulevard will be extended along the northern boundary of the property. This project is planned for the spring of 1992. Parks and Trails It is proposed that the developers pay cash in lieu of land for park dedication. This cash will then be used to help pay for park land that could be developed with subsequent phases. For the short term, the elementary school facility will provide park area for the residents of phase I. Ono of the goals of the Planning Commission should be to determine to 10 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 what extent the City should be relying on school district property in this area for park resources. Perhaps active playground area and the demands for ballfields, playground equipment, etc., may be satisfied by school facilities. Planning Commission may wish, however, to require picnic or other passive park areas to be developed somewhere within the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. It is my hope that we can establish a formula that identifies how much of the Cardinal Hills development should be acquired for park land given the availability of school district property for park use. This is one of the issues that the Planning Commission will be addressing when we review the development plan for the balance of the property. Sidewalks As you may recall, in the concept plane developed by the planner, it is proposed that a pedestrian walkway be extended along the north side of the school boulevard. A sidewalk from Cardinal Hills leading to a controlled crossing needs to be developed with subsequent phases. It is suggested that the Planning Commission recommend that the school boulevard sidewalk be placed on the City's sidewalk development grid and to incorporate a pedestrian crossing and associated sidewalk into design work for future Cardinal Hills development. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I have reviewed the comprehensive plan and found that the proposed development is consistent with almost every aspect of the comprehensive plan. It should be noted, however, that the plan does suggest that the City should avoid leapfrog development. This particular development could be construed as leapfrog development; however, the coat to install utilities that allow development far removed from existing utilities is being paid up front entirely by the developers. Therefore, the financial impact of leapfrog development is mitigated. The plat otherwise complies with the comprehensive plan of the City. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: I. Motion to approve the preliminary and final plat of phase i I of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. Motion Is based on the finding that the preliminary and final plats are consistent with the comprehensive plan and meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and utility design standards. Council Agenda - 7/22/91 In its motion to recommend approval, the Planning Commission placed the developer on notice that the design of subsequent phases should include the following features: 1. Uouble fronting lots should be eliminated. if it is not possible to eliminate double fronting lots, such lots should have added depth. The Cardinal Hills park plan should not be impacted by the availability of nearby school park facilities. Future park development must comply with the standard park dedication requirement. If Council approves the preliminary plat, then the stage would be set to order the project, as the public Improvement portion of the project has been moving ahead simultaneous to the plat development process. Completing the public improvement portion of the project prior to plat development was possible only because the developer provided the cash up front necessary to move forward on design of plans prior to approval of the plat. This alternative assumes that Council has adopted the developer's agreement. 2. Motion to deny approval of the preliminary plat of phase I of the Cardinal Hills development. If the Council does not agree with the finding noted above, then this alternative should be selected. Motion to table approval of the plat pending submittal of additional data. If the Council is not satisfied with the plat and wishes to sea revisions made, or if there is other additional information that may be necessary prior to a decision, then Council could table the matter pending completion of data gathering. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council recommend granting approval of the preliminary and final plats. It is our view that the subdivision should be approved because it meets all City code requirements and is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Phase I is dosigned in a manner that provides the City and developer with flexibility in determining how the subsequent phasoe should be developed. In the motion to approve, Council 12 C� Council Agenda - 7/22/91 may wish to echo the Planning Commission's view regarding double front lot development and future park design. Establishing firm direction on these design issues will enable the developer to begin preliminary design on future phases. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the preliminary plat of phase I of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision; Excerpts from comprehensive plan. 13 SUBDIVISION POLICIES 1. All subdivisions should conform to the Comprehensive Plan (land —' use, transportation, and community facilities) of the community. �•^�/<y 2. All land developments should be controlled in a logical and practical way through the planning process so as to gradually develop the land utilizing its advantages yet being sensitive to C.—f/'<s Cexisting natural features worth saving for the future. — 3. Emphasis shall be given to contiguous development accentuating the homogenous nature of the community rather than a patchwork Q�<�{•;e.va.� of localized and unrelated projects, and discourage the — extension of public utilities to this non-contiguous development, thereby discouraging 'leap frog" development. 4. All subdivisions, no matter how small, should be planned in such a manner as to allow proper subdivision of surrounding land at a future date; a preliminary plan for the potential subdivision of the surrounding sites should be prepared regardless of ownership — involved to assure that the smaller subdivision will not conflict with future development potential. Where a subdivision is surrounded by previously platted land, said subdivision _ should be related to the existing conditions. S. tend platted into larger lots should be so planned and developed . as to permit proper re -subdivision in the future even in sirnetions where further re -subdivision may not appear likely. 6. The subdivision regulations should contain adequate provisions for deviation from the strict application of the regulations to allow reasonable flexibility and imaginative site design within athe intent and purpose of zoning and subdivision regulations. Z.p. 7. All lots should abut on a public street; access via private streets or easements should not be permitted exceptwhere absolutely essential to the enjoyment of property rights. L). Street names should be in accordance with a uniform street a"`f �^"r•f'•^ . naming and numbering system adopted by the City. 9. All lots and streets should be arranged no as to avoid inefficient land ahapeo (ouch as triangle) and sizes (such as C.— s very narrow outlots). 10. All subdivision proposals should be complete; that is, they should have paved streets, curb and gutter, all utilities, and - public areas such as parks and playgrounds. +� 11. Overhead utility lines and poise should not be permitted. All utilities should be placed underground and should be along rear .� or side lot lines when feasible. _ _42- r 12. Subdivisions should be physically develored in full, urban density areas should be provided sanitary sewer, paved streets, e. /t"s curb and gutter, public water and other improvements deemed necessary. 17. In the case of small subdivisions or multiple ownerships, the cc-plete subdividers or developers may not be required to install complete facilities provided it is dc.-cnstrat-d that this is clearly not feasible or practicable. prior to final approval of all subdivisions, however, it shall be determined AA what improvements may be added by the community. When substantially developed, full facilities (sanitary sewer, public water, paved streets, etc.) should be added through action initiated by the community and assessed against the benefited properties. 14. Future subdivisions, whether residential, commercial, or industrial, shall be required to set aside public green space (parks, playgrounds, etc.) or cash in lieu of land for public �•- p� 's recreation in accordance with a uniform set of standards. -43- LJ 0 GENERAL HOUSING POLICIES. In Monticello, urban planning should be designed to promote high standards for residential development and help to assure the best possible living environment. 1. The Planning Commission, in coordination with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, will be advocates for reform of land use controls, increased housing funding, governmental and legislative changes, and in general, act to increase public awareness of housing problems and solutions. The Commission will evaluate the City's regulatory codes and ordinances to insure that these regulations provide maximum opportunity to develop a range of housing types at various income levels and permit utilization of innovative site development and construction techniques. 2. Attempts will be made to develop and implement affirmative programs for open housing. Open housing is housing that is available to all persons without regard to race, creed, color, sex, or ethnic background. 3. New housing areas shall be provided utilities as they expand C•^f A" toward the perimeter of the City. 4. Residential uses should be permitted to mix with commercial or industrial uses unless it can be demonstrated that the residential and non-residential uses will be in conflict. S. Developments shall be designed to respect the natural features of the site to the maximum extent feasible. 6. Development proposals will be evaluated with respect to their potential effect upon adjacent and nearby developments and their (fu P! �S effect upon the public welfare of the City and adjacent communities. 7. Developments must be developed according to well conceived plana that tend to unify and relate to each other; developments that Lo r /'e 5 are a hodge-podge and ill-conceived will be disapproved. B. Within the OAA, a density of 10,000 to 12,000 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit will be promoted in the areas of utility service oontiquous to the present city and in those areas where tl.ca central utility service construction is contemplated within five years. 9. Although anticipated densities in areas capable of utility service within five years may be designed at 10,000 to 12.000 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit, building permits e, 0 shall not be issued for a density of more than one dwelling unit 1 per 2.4 acres with on-site sewer systems based upon percolation tests. -44- } M lo. The existing density requirement (land area per dwelling units) as outlined in the zoning ordinance shall be continually i reviewed to determine their appropriateness for adoption to N changing times and conditions. 11. Appropriate urban renewal measures will be taken to assure maintenance of the existing housing supply in good to excellent condition. Suitable standards for structure and yard MA maintenance will be developed and enforced to help assure maintenance of residential neighborhoods in a sound condition. 12. All types of housing will be permitted including apartment structures, townhouses, and others, provided each is properly located according to the Comprehensive Plan, the site plans and structural quality (materials, workmanship, and design) are in S accordance with the highest feasible standards, and each is in conformance with the provisions of the zoning ordinance. 13. where provisions for sanitary sewer are not contemplated in the near future (within five years), the denaity shall not exceed one dwelling unit per forty acres. The actual lots site per unit, however, may be as small as 2.5 acres subject to the provision of an approved individual on-site sewage system based upon percolation tests. Sinqle Family Housinq Pulicies 1. Home occupations will be permitted provided ouch activities are conducted in a manner which assumes that evidence of such occupation is not present. 2. Single family housing should not be allowed individual access to major thoroughfares but will orient toward minor residential streets. Multiple Family Housing Policies 1. Multiple Family Dwellings are recognized as being a worthwhile addition to the urban environment and tax base under conditions a9 established in the Comprehensive Plan and by zoning, subdivision, and other codes and ordinances. However, the Planning Commission will look with disfavor upon projects with design features that are considered inappropriate, ouch as architectural designs that are incompatible with existing and proposed developments and unimaginative site designs. 2. Multiple Dwelling projects shall be encouraged to develop as *Planned units' with specific plans submitted for structures, architectural design, landscaping, circulation, open space, recreation facilities. and any other features that may be proposed. .s5_ f 1 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 B. Consideration of a request to rezone 10 acres located south of the proposed elementary school site and adjacent to County Road 117. Request is to rezone from AO (agricultural) to R-1 (sinqle familv residential). Applicant, Value Plus Homes. (J.0.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: In order to develop the property associated with the preliminary plat of Cardinal Hills residential subdivision, the land area involved needs to be rezoned from agricultural to an R-1 designation. It is proposed at this time to only rezone that portion of the land area developed with phase I of Cardinal Hills Estates. Planning Commission recommends approval. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to approve proposed rezoning of N 1/2 of the SW 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 121, Range 25, in the city of Monticello from AO (agricultural) to R-1 (single family residential). Motion is based on the finding that the proposed zoning district is consistent with tho comprehonsive plan of the City, it is consistent with the geographic area, and there is a need for establishment of an R-1 zone in this area. As noted in the proposed finding above, the use of this property for residential purposes is completely consistent with the comprehensive plan of the City. Residential development of this location will serve to complement the proposed school district development to the north. 2. Motion to deny proposed amendment to the zoning map. If the Council is not comfortable with the proposed rezoning, then this alternative should be selected. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning request, as the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan of the City, and the proposed plat complements the school development occurring to the north. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Map showing zoning district boundaries. l 14 I 01 :4. J�3 , 1 kiddie �..� h0t© t � f t ` se 1 � aCdinal Pha NO G Council Agenda - 7/22/91 9. Consideration of a request to amend Section 3-2: General Buildinq and Performance Requirements, by adding a provision requiring a two -car garage be constructed along with construction of each single familv dwelling unit,. (J.O.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Planning Commission recommends approval of the ordinance amendment per alternative #1 below. Council is asked to consider recommending the adoption of a zoning ordinance amendment which would require that all new single family homes include development of a two -car garage. The proposed amendment stems In part from concerns voiced by homeowners in the Meadow Oak neighborhood regarding development of homes via an FHA housing program. Of concern to the neighborhood was the fact that the FHA program did not allow the development of two -car garages. The homeowners in the area felt that development of lesser valued homes ($70,000 maximum) with single -car garages would result in the depreciation of neighborhood land values. It was asserted that a one -car garage is not sufficient area to store a vehicle and other items commonly found in most homes such as bikes, lawn mowers, lawn chairs, grills, etc. It was suggested that most of these items would need to be stored outside, which would be unsightly and ultimately result in the depreciation of the existing home values in the neighborhood. Within the past month, City staff has been informed that the same FNA program will now fund homes that have a two -car garage as long as two -car garages are required by ordinance. It is, therefore, proposed then that the City adopt an ordinance requiring a minimum garage size of 400 sq ft. This new requirement is significant when one considers that the Cardinal Hills development will include many homes built through the FHA program. By amending the ordinance as proposed, we have an opportunity to assure development of two - car garages at the outset of the development of Cardinal Hills, and thus avoid problems the City has had in the past in other neighborhoods where garages were not constructed with the original dwelling. In addition, the two -car garage requirement will enhance the value of the FHA homes constructed during early stages of the Cardinal Hills development and could thereby improve the potential of development of higher valued homes through other loan programs. Council Agenda - 7/22/91 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to approve the ordinance amendment requiring that all single-family dwellings be constructed to include a garage with a minimum floor area of 400 sq ft. Under this alternative, Council would make the finding that a minimum requirement of garage area of 400 sq ft is reasonable and proper given the preponderance of two -car families, and the added storage area provides space necessary to store household articles inside rather than outside, thereby improving the appearance of neighborhoods and contributing toward maintaining property values. It is important to note that both the Value Plus developers and the Good Value (Evergreens subdivision developer) developers are aware that the City is considering making the proposed amendment, and they have made no objections to this new requirement. In addition, except for the special program that formerly required that all single-family dwellings be built with a one -car garage, there have been no other requests in the last five years for a building permit from anyone wishing to build a home with anything less than a 400 eq ft garage. Therefore, this additional requirement does not appear to create a hardship for the type of homeowners that have been constructing homes in Monticello in the recent past. Motion to deny approval of said ordinance amendment. Council could take the position that the facts do not support the nood to require that all homes be built with a two -car garage. Council could take the view that homes built without garages will not necessarily result in the depreciation in value of adjoining properties. Perhaps the Council would be uncomfortable in requiring a two -car garago knowing that doing so would eliminate the homeowner's option of staging the devolopmont of their residential proporty and could result in a segmont of the population being shut out of the market. STAFF RECOMMENDATION1 Staff recommends that the ordinance bo adopted as proposed. It appears that univorsally homeowners aro building homos with at loast a two -car garago; therefore, it does not appear that the proposed ordinanco will significantly impact currant home building activity. In addition, the two -car garage 16 0 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 requirement will lessen outside storage problems in residential areas, which will serve to preserve property values. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of proposed ordinance amendments; Survey of garage requirements noted by Elk River, Big Lake, Maple Grove, Buffalo, Maple Lake, and Annandale. 17 MEW L�►JG(t4GE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THAT CHAPTER 3, SECTION 2, OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO DWELLING UNIT RESTRICTIONS BE AMENDED BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING: 3-2: GENERAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS: [B] DWELLING UNIT RESTRICTION: 5. In the R-1 (single family residential) and R-2 (single and two-family) districts, all single and two-family dwelling units constructed after July 22, 1991, must include development of an attached or detached garage. Minimum size requirement for garage floor is 400 sq ft with a minimum garage door opening of 16 ft. Adopted this 22nd day of July, 1991. Mayor City Administrator l N�CJ LK���L�F�GE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THAT CHAPTER 3, SECTION 2 [D], OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, USES, AND EQUIPMENT BE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 3-2: GENERAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS: [D] ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, USES, AND EQUIPMENT: 5. No permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one (1) private accessory structure for each dwelling. Each applicant for a building permit to construct any dwellings shall be required to provide off- street parking space for at least one (1) automobile per family to be housed in addition to any garage space to be used. Adopted this 22nd day of July, 1991. City Administrator Mayor G) 5. On a through lot (a lot fronting on two (2) parallel streets), both street lines shall be front lotlines of applying the yard and parking regulations of this ordinance. [D] ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, USES, AND EQUIPMENT: 1. An accessury building shall be considered an integral part of the principal building if it is connected to the principal building either directly or by an enclosed passageway. 2. No accessory bull -ding shall be erected or located within any required yard other than the rear yard. 3. Accessory buildings and garages shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height and shall be ten (10) feet or more from all side lot lines of adjoining lots, five (5) feet or more from the rear lot line, shall be ten (10) feet or more from any other building or structure on the same lot, and shall not be located within a utility easement. 4. No accessory building or garage shall occupy more than LwenLy-flve (25) percent of a rear yard, nor exceed one Lhousand (1,000) square feet of fluur area. 5. No permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one (I) private accessory structure for each dwelling. Each applicant for a building permit to construct any dwellings shall be required to provide off-street parking space for at least one (1). automobile. per family to be housed in addition to any garage space to be used. Every dwelling unit hereafter erected shall be so located on the lot so that at least a two(21 car garage, old{e either attached or detached, can be locatod on saga 10L without aCvariance. Site plans shall indicate (�� ),•,� n APr r S locaLion of potential garage. G. No Accessory uses or equipmonL such ns nir conditioning cooling structures or condensers which genoraLo noise may be located in a side yard except for side yards abutting streets where equipment is fully screenad from view. (E) DRAINAGE PLANS: In Lhe case of all apartment, business, and Industrial developments, a minimum of 3 sots of drainage plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review, and the final drainage plans shall be subject to writton approval. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 3/5/^� ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THAT CHAPTER 3, SECTION 4 [Gj 1, OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO MINIMUM FLOOR AREA PER DWELLING UNIT BE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 3-4: AREA AND BUILDING SIZE REGULATIONS: [G) MINIMUM FLOOR AREA PER DWELLING UNIT: I. ONE AND/OR TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES: The minimum floor area for such type buildings shall be as follows: (a) One -Story Dwelling --960 square feet. (b) Two -Story Dwelling --750 square feet per story. (c) EXCEPTION: The minimum square footage of a one-story building may be reduced to 964 square feet if a garage is added with at least 400 square feet. in no case, however, shall the minimum dimension of that garage be less than 16 feet. Adopted this 22nd day of July, 1991. Mayor City Administrator I .o C'apkENT OR�INraNG� L6 �)C,UPG1= 10. Water towers 11. Poles, towers, and other structures for essential service 12. Necessary mechanical and electrical appurtenances 13. Television and radio antennas not exceeding twenty (20) feet above roof 14. Wind electrical generators [F] No excluded roof equipment or strurturnl element. extending beyond the limited height of a building may occupy more than twenty-five (25) percent of the area of such roof not to exceed ten (10) feet unless otherwise noted. (Gj MINIMUM FLOOR AREA PER DWELLING UNIT: 1. ONE AND/OR TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES: The minimum floor area for such type buildings shall be as follows: (a) One -Story Dwelling --960 square feet. (b) Two -Story Dwelling --750 square feet per story. (c) EXCEPTION: The minimum square footage of a one-story building may be reduced to 864 square foot if a garage is added with at least 3L6 square feet. in no case, however, shall the minimum dimension of that garage be less than 14 feet. 2. MULTIPLE. DWELLING UNITS: Except for elderly housing, living units classified as multiple dwellings shall have the following minimum floor areas per unit: (a) Efficiency Units 500 square foot (b) One Bedroom Units 600 square feet (c) Two Bedroom Units 720 square foot (d) Moro than Two Bedroom Units An additional 100 square foot for each additional bedroom .l. ELDERLY (SENIOR CITIZEN) HOUSING: Living units classified as elderly (senior citizen) housing units shall have the following minimum floor areas per unit: ! (a) Efficiency Units 440 square foot (b) One Bedroom 520 square foot MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 3/21 O GARAGE REQUIREMENT 8 SIZE SURVEY J CITIES SURVEYED Elk River Big Lake Meek Grove Buffalo Maple Lake Annandale Is a garage Yes Yes Yes No, minimum No No required with solback for each new home? future garage requirement Yes, No garage min. Is there a 22' wide No Depends on No Minimum house No minimum zoning district size is 800 sq ft garage size? without basement 1,000 aq ft Is there a storage 12 x 20 It. Storage bldg Storage b'dg No No No bldg. requirement? storage bldg can satisfy can satisfy meets garage garage garage requirement requirement requirement Is there a minimum Ono -stall Minimum Double -stall No No No garage size? garage 300 sq it garage 300 .aq ft 14 x 20 Approx. 400 aq ft Council Agenda - 7/22/91 io. Consideration of a request for a conditional use permit which would allow public school use in an R-1 (single family residential) zoning district. Applicant. Monticello School District #882. (J.O.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Planning Commission approved the conditional use permit request per alternative tl below. Council is asked to review the site plan associated with the conditional use permit application submitted by the school district. As you know, the proposed development of an elementary schoul at this location is one of the factors that caused the City Council to conduct a planning study of the southeast quadrant of the city. One of the major issues to be addressed by the study is the potential problem created by development of a school facility in close proximity to the Industrial areas. According to the consulting planner, there are methods to mitigate the potential negative impacts of the two uses, and the school can actually act to become an excellent buffer zone between industrial uses and residential uses to the south. The remainder of this memo will focus on the actual site plan itself and will end with a short list of conditions that the Council may want to attach to the conditional use pormit. SITE PLAN REVIEW The proposed elementary school is designod to handle a total capacity of 725 students. The optimum number of people accommodated in the gymnasium at any one time is 435 people. Parking Parking doos not appear to be a problem. According to Stephen Griffith of NAC, the proposed parking arrangement will satisfy parking demands created by the proposed use. In addition, the site is configured so as to allow for expansion of parking areas in the event the structure is enlarged. Of slight concern is the placement of the parking relative to the ballfiolds. As you will note on the plan, the ballfields are somo distance from the parking lot. It should be noted that all ballfiold-rolatod parking must use the parking lot and should not be allowed to park on tho graes near the ballfield area, nor should ballfield parking be allowed on Fallon Avenuo. is Council Agenda - 7/22/91 Setbacks The elementary school is located on the southwest corner of the property and is relatively far removed from the industrial property to the north. The structure meets all setback _requirements and appears to be placed strategically to allow for future expansion of the facility to the north. Loadinq and Unloading Areas The site plan calls for a service drive entering the northwest portion of the building. The original plan does not show sufficient space for a turn -around near the loading berth area. This requires that the driver back his vehicle a Significant distance to the service area. It is proposed that this portion of the plan be amended to show the addition of a paved surface necessary to allow vehicles to turn around at a point near the loading berth area. Sidewalks The plan shows an ample system of Sidewalks for on-site rodPst,rinn use. It is proposed, however, that the plan be amended to show a sidewalk extending from the southerly most sidewalk along the driveway entrance to the location of the future school boulevard sidewalk. It is suggested that this additional sidewalk be installed with the initial development of the structure, as it is likely that the school boulevard sidewalk will be installed in a relatively short time. It is also proposed that the conditional use permit require that a sidewalk be installed along side the driveway that provides access to Fallon Avenue. This additional sidewalk, however, need not be installed immediately and should be installed at such time that pedestrian access is necessary, which would likely occur when the Klein property develops. Landscapinq Trees: City ordinance requires planting of 91 overstory trees. Shelly Johnson has indicated that there will be no problem meeting this requirement. Industrial/School Uses Coniferous Screen: The landscaping plan includes planting of evergreen trees at 15 -foot intervals along the northern boundary of the property. This would provide the school district's portion of the screening requirement necessary to separate the industrial uses from school uses. At such time that the industrial land develops, it will be a requirement that a similar planting be installed so as to complete the screening affect. The additional 19 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 screening would be completed by the industry developing at this location. I have been informed by the school district that the school district's portion of the industry/school screen will be met. Sewer/Water The school district will be financing the full cost to extend sewer service the full length of the school district property along Fallon Avenue and will also be paying for the cost to bring sewer from its present position at Dundas to the northwest corner of the site. In addition, the school district will be paying a trunk charge associated with the cost to extend the deep trunk line to the southwest corner of the site at some point in the future. The sewer line will be extended along the east side of the Fallon Avenue right-of- way. The water line will also be extended along the east side of the Fallon Avenue right-of-way, the cost of which will be financed entirely by the school district; however, the City will be establishing an agreement which would allow fees obtained from future ueere of this water line to be passed through to the school district, thereby allowing the school district to recover some of their cost associated with installing the water line. Unfortunately, most of the trees that you see along Fallon Avenue will need to be removed with the development of the sewer and water lines. On the other hand, most of the trees being removed are Elm trees. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN As noted earlier, the City has undertaken an effort to update its comprehensive plan. This effort will be completed in conjunction with development of the school facilities. It appears that school development as proposed dovetails nicely with the overall development pattern. In sum, the conditional use permit as requested is consistent with the comprehensive plan of the City. D. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to recommend approval of the conditional use t pormit which would allow school use in an R-1 zone ah �, subject to the following conditions: �J 1. The sato plan should be emended to show a sidewalk along the driveway providing access to the school boulevard. 20 it Q,.a 2 X0.,,1(,, w � �• r ,(, . Council Agenda - 7/22/91 2. The school district agrees to install a sidewalk along the driveway providing access to Fallon Avenue at such time that residential development adjoining the site warrants development of the sidewalk. 3. The drive leading to the service dock and loading areae should be modified to include space for a turn -around near the dock area. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, all final parking lot design and grading plane must be approved by the City Engineer. Under this alternative, Council would make the finding that development of a school facility as proposed is consistent with the comprehensive plan and compatible with the character of the existing and future neighborhood. This alternative is supportable, as it has been well established that the school use at this location is proper and represents a positive development factor in this area. It is my understanding that the School District has no problem with the conditions noted. 2. Motion to deny said conditional use permit. This does not appear to be a reasonable alternative, as the school district has indicated a willingness to comply with any reasonable conditions that the City might impose. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends that Council select alternative #I. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of elementary school site plan; Copy of landscape plan; Copy of engineer's comments regarding grading plan. 21 e (i© 3IN "."i` LAOSCOPE PC ;N • 9 o 0 0SNiOrrScliden July 3, 1991 Mr. Jeff O'Neill City of Monticello 250 East Broadway P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Proposed Grade School OSM Project # 1748.74 Dear Mr. O'Neill: 2021 Fast Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331.3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors `. We have completed a preliminary review of the grading plan for the above noted project and would offer the following comments: The grading plan shows storm sewer discharging into the Fallon Avenue ditch from the proposed school parking lot. The Fallon Avenue ditch is not well defined and does not have a cross section sufficient to carry the proposed discharge. Several options are available to alleviate this situation including constructing the storm sewer to a centralized ponding area, or constructing a detention pond between Fallon Avenue and the proposed parking lot. This detention pond could have a flow restrictor to limit the storm water discharge into the ditch for both the normal and extreme events. 2. The proposed ponding area located east of the school would be created in addition to the proposed centralized ponding area located midway between CR118 and Fallon Avenue along the school's north property line. The grade school pond, if constructed as shown, shall be connected to the central pond with storm sewer upon construction of the central pond. 3. The hall fields shown along the north property line are proposed to drain into a low area located north of the school property. This low area most likely will be filled during future development and thus would present a flooding problem for the ball fields. A possible solution would be to construct a shallow swale along the north property line to the centralized pond. The drawing should be modified to satisfy this problem. t 1 e4ud(¢pnnun4y emow,v /C� Mr. Jeff O'Neill July 3, 1991 Page 2 4. Drainage calculations for the entire site for the 5 year and 100 year rainfall events should be computed and submitted with the revised grading plan. An overall plan with preliminary grades for the entire 120 acre school site would be helpful to plan for the ultimate development of the school property. This plan would include the incorporation of the centralized ponding area along with the proposed grade school and middle school properties. We would be happy to sit down with the school's design personnel and discuss these comments at a mutually convenient time. We will complete a more thorough review upon receipt of the revised grading plan. If you have any questions or require any additional information, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON r by ASSOCIATES, INC. V,a-,. L Bret A. Weiss, P.E. Project Engineer sb 0191-Jn c: John Simola, City of Monticello Shelly Johnson, Monticello School District JPB EJ D File 0 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 11. Consideration of a request to rezone 120 acres of land from AO (agriculturall to R-1 (sinqle family residential), which would allow development of an elementary school facility as a conditional use. Applicant, Monticello School District #882. (J.O.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning request per alternative $1. Council is asked to respond to the Monticello School District's request to rezone 120 acres of land zoned for agricultural uses to the R-1 (single family residence) zoning designation. The 120 -acre section consists of the middle school site (40) acres, the elementary school site (40 acres), and 40 acres of vacant land between the two school sites. This vacant area will be developed for school uses at some point in the future. The rezoning to R-1 will enable the site to qualify for a conditional use permit at this location. In response to the potential development of school facilities at this location, and in response to other related issues pertaining to development of industrial land in the area, the City Council authorized a planning study. The preliminary results of the study indicate that school uses in this area, though in close proximity to industrial uses, is proper and represents a positive element in the continued development of this portion of the community. Following is a summary of the planner's comments as they pertain to the rezoning request. SCHOOL/INDUSTRIAL USE CONFLICTS The planner hao noted that certain measures need to be taken to mitigate the potential conflicts between uses, which could include the following: 1) Requiring development of shared evergreen screen along the school district/industrial area boundary (included In conditional use permit requirements). 2) Modify industrial site development standards in areas adjacent to the school in a manner that will assure compatability. SCHOOL/CARDINAL HILLS DEVELOPMENT The school and residential areae are compatible( however, a few design issues deserve close attention as both areas develop in the future. 22 Council Agenda - 7/22/41 1. It is important that the two areas be designed in concert in terms of street and sidewalk access to school boulevard. 2. It is anticipated that the football field may someday be relocated somewhere between the elementary and middle school sites. Site design, including parking and lighting, should be designed in a manner that minimizes impact on the Cardinal Hills development area. A separate conditional use permit will be required at the time the stadium is developed, at which time site plan issues would be addressed. SCHOOL/KLEIN FARM DEVELOPMENT Representatives from the Klein family have reviewed the land use concepts in detail and agree with the concept that the farm will ultimately become a residential area, with the north half medium density and the south half strictly single-family density. Again, residential and school uses are compatible. GENERAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION It is likely that intensification of school uses and the (. development of the Cardinal Hills subdivision will place additional pressure on the Chelsea Corridor/Highway 25 intersection. ultimately, this added pressure will create the need to extend the proposed school boulevard from the school site to Highway 25. This boulevard would provide the school property and nearby residences with direct access to Highway 25 and would serve to relieve congestion at the intersection of Chelsea and Highway 25. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve rezoning of 120 acres of land from AO (agricultural) to R-1 (single family residential), which would allow development of an elementary school facility as a conditional use. Motion is based on the following finding: `j Q� 1. The rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan prepared by the City and is consistent with recommendations made by the consulting planner. 7 2. The rezoning is consistent with the character and geography of the area. 23 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 3. The need for the rezoning has been demonstrated, as it will enable development of a needed school facility at this location. Council should select this alternative if the facts support the finding above. 2. Motion to deny the rezoning request. Council should select this alternative if the facts do not support the finding above. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports alternative fl for reasons noted in the discussion above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Map showing proposed rezone area; Excerpt from comprehensive plan; Copy of land -use concepts prepared by the planner. 1 24 R g 3 12,� I 2 \` I 1\, \ B2 Eleni. ' ' . ' , ` Middle=`-1�► Schon -�-=- School Rezone to R-1, -- R , Phase. 1, A!® Cardinal ills AO \ I COMMUNITY FACILITIES POLICY 1. Presently, the development of land for public facilities such as parks and playgrounds is considered more important thau the acquisition of such land. However, with respect to acquisition, land must be purchased before proper sites are usurped by private developments or high land prices make acquisition unfeasible. it to a desirable goal of the City to balance acquisition and development efforts. 2. All public facilities ace to be developed according to generally accepted standards and the results of thorough study. 3. where feasible, private developers will be required to set aside a portion of their land for public uses where this is not feasible or desirable, developers will be required to contribute cash In lieu of land, with such money to be utilized for the purchase and development of recreational facilities. 4. School facilities should be fullv utilised by makino builAing and land available to the public for use when s4ch doesi conflict with normal function of the school facilities. S. Private developers will not be required to donate land for school sites. 6. Churches should have an ample site for building, landscaping, potential expansion, and off-street parking. Parking should be provided on the maximum design capacity. Churches should be located adjacent to a thoroughfare at collector street and have easy access to the area served. They should not be located on minor residential attests and in the midst of residential neighborhoods. T. The City should not accept substandard lands such as swamps, power line easements, ate., for that development of park lands. This shall include lands laid out in subdivision plans. Open space policies Before delineating open space policies, a definition of the term is necessary. Traditionally, open space has been primarily defined as that arms which is retained in or restored to a condition whets natural systems predominate and which may be used tot recreation, or preservation purposes. open apses was often regarded as a separate end contained entity usually under the ownership of a governmental jurisdiction. Recent trends indicate that open apace, like the people it serves, is becoming more directly integrated with its surroundings. aecoming more a part of the total urban fabric, Open •pace is being more olosely integrated into the urban living and working environment. Because of this integrating phenomenon, many of the advantages and responsibilities of open space are equally applicable to public and private lands. Cf( . Ci t•y of Monticello J Chelsea Area Land Use and Circulation Study Existing Zoning R•1 Single Family® 6•2 limited Business■ Row Residential B•] Hi h Business��, \ ~•ta /� Planned grit Dewlepmem ® g "'ay R•1 Moble If., Pah ® 1.1 tlghl industrial AO AgrkultvaVopen SpaceQ 1.2 heavy industrial a // PZ -hl IMlormance Zone•Mixed '.>< —A� Ci t'y of Monticel to Chel sea Area Land Use and Ci rcul at ion Study Physical Issues orderty Amesatbn Meas &ansticwtatlon haves \. PotmW Pedestrim Bsisa09 NatvalOrahagewaymum t � In tf _ art_ Access tb4ru Om�erouYy � L unsale Mtentctton ase Pres } i AYgmKM ren oleo sctvd iNfUkl Woperly ee ole • yntrs».�aysss�rar�s»sseaw�t� KieIft%v j Mnpm If Need for Addnanit �. .....r., fast-v&II ttwdway Cel c. City of Monticello 1�y Chelsea Area Land Use and Circulation Study Pro'posed Land Use low Oenshy Residential ® Institutional. `\ Mecum Denshy Residential ® Neighborhood Commercial Iligh Densily Residenlial 0 highway Convrtercial Mobile if.., Park ® light Incksuial \� tial ent heavy InfirslrLd s saw ,. W ..........� -� �` Council Agenda - 7/22/91 12. Consideration of a resolution accepting bid and ordering City Projects 91-01 (Fallon Avenue), 91-02 (Briar Oakes Estate), and 91-03 (Cardinal Hills Phase I). (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Council is asked to consider accepting the bids and ordering the associated work to commence. Assuming that the previous agenda items have been approved by Council and assuming that Prestige Builders of St. Cloud and Value Plus developers have executed the terms of the development agreements, then City Council is in position to accept the lowest bid and order the work to begin. Between now and Monday evening, I will be working closely with the developers in making sure that all financial securities are in place and all other terms of the development agreement are completed. At the Council meeting, I will outline any issues that might have arisen that could possibly derail the project. At this point, everything appears to be positive. Bids for each one of the prospective projects are due at 10:00 a.m. on Friday, July 19. A brief description of the projects are as follows: Project 91-01 (Fallon Avenue) The Fallon Avenue project consists of extending water and sewer along the east side of Fallon from Dundas Road to the now school boulevard. It also includes the extension of water from school boulevard south to the Cardinal Hills plat and force main and lift station from the Cardinal Hills plat to school boulevard. The feasibility study indicates an estimated project cost• of $209,700. The engineer's estimates for construction cost• for this project are $146,200. Project 91-02 (Briar Oakes Estate) This project consists of sewer, water, storm sewer, and street construction for the first phase of the Briar Oakes Estate along County Road 118 in the original Meadow Oak subdivision. Water and sewer are being extended from the Meadow Oak plat through the incompleted fourth addition. The feasibility study indicates a cost of $294,100 for this project. The City Engineer has ostimated a construction cost of $271,100. Project costs include all costs, i.e., legal fees, inspection fees, overhead, otc. Construction cost is the contractor's portion of the cost only. 25 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 Prosect 91-03 (Cardinal Hills) This project consists of sewer, water, storm sewer, and street construction for the first phase of Cardinal Hills, which contains 24 lots. One of the lots, however, will be used for the temporary lift station site and should not be built upon until the deep sewer allows abandonment of the lift station. The feasibility study indicates a project cost for this work of $201,500. The City Engineer has estimated the construction coat at $174,500. A preliminary bid tabulation will be provided as supporting data for the agenda item. The final bid tabulation along with recommendations as to the lowest responsible bidder will be made at Monday evening's meeting. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: I. Motion to adopt a resolution accepting the bid from the lowest responsible bidder. This alternative should be selected if the developers Agreements are fully executed. (� —'?7.. Motion to able adopting a resolution one hold the bids until agreements are executed. In the event one of the developers is unable to execute the development agreement by providing financial securities, etc., the City may wish to hold the bide until all responsibilities relating to the development agreement are in place. 3. Motion to deny adoption of the resolution. This item should be selected if one of the developers backs out of the deal. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As noted above, City staff will be working with the developers toward oxocutiun of the developer agreement. If there is a problem in obtaining the financial securities required, or if any of the developers wish to back out because of prices, etc., this information will be provided to you at the meeting. O. SUPPORTING DATAs Copy of letter of understanding regarding improvements between City and School District; Copy of bid tabulation; Copy of resolution for adoption. 26 it July 17, 1991 MONTICELLO 250 East Broadway P. O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362.9245 Phone: (612) 295.2711 Metro: (612) 333.5739 Fax: (612) 295-4404 Mr. Sheldon Johnson Superintendent Monticello School District #882 PO Box 897 Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Shelly: The following letter outlines terms and understandings regarding the Fallon Avenue sewer and water project as understood by City staff. Based on your fax of July 19, 1991, it is my understanding that you concur with the points noted below. This letter will serve as documentation of the School District's position and will be included in materials that Council will review prior to ordering the project. 1. Fallon Avenue Improvements. Prior to City action to accept the lowest bid and order the improvement, the School District will agree to make payments to the City to coincide with payments that the City must make. Under this scenerio, the City would request funds from the School District as the project is completed which, in turn, would be paid to the City, and the City, in turn, would pay the contractor. If at the completion of the project it is determined that the School District paid an amount in excess of the actual costa, then the amount paid in excess will be reimbursed to the School District. The School District shall provide all easements and land dedication necessary to install sewer, water, and street improvements. The City agrees to pursue development of an ordinance amendment that would enable the City to recover a portion of the Fallon Avenue utilities construction cost through establishment of a utilities access charge. All funds collected (leas City coats) shall be passed through to the School District. 9 Mr. Sheldon Johnson July 17, 1991 Page 2 In recognition of the City's trunk sewer area assessment policy, the School District will pay $50,000 to the City, which may be paid in equal annual installments over five years without an interest charge. The $50,000 fee is calculated based on development of 40 acres at $1,250/acre. In the event the present area assessment fee of $1,250 per acre is adjusted by the City before the School District's area assessment debt is completely retired, the remaining area assessment debt will be adjusted accordingly. The developer agreements governing the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision and the Evergreens subdivision include terms that call for payment of the current area assessments charge as homes are constructed. Similarly, when any land development requires immediate development of a sewer trunk line or if it contributes toward creating long-term need to develop a sewer trunk line, the area assessment policy will be applied to said development. "School boulevard" is tentatively scheduled for construction in the spring or summer of 1992. It is the City's understanding that school boulevard will likely be designed to rural standards; however, all. design considerations have not been analyzed at this time, and it is possible that the roadway may need to be designed to urban standards which would include curb/gutter and storm sewer. Once the boulevard is built, the City will accept it into the street system just as it does with any other street that is developed within the city boundaries. The City will consider funding a portion of the roadway coat associated with "oversizing" the roadway if deemed necessary by the City. The School District will pay 50% of the roadway development costs not attributed to oversizing. It is understood that the payment process of the School District's portion of tho roadway cost will be conducted in the same manner as item 1 above up to $224,000. Due to the fact that the School's bond issue did not include total roadway costs including grading, any roadway costs in excess of $224,000 for road development may be assessed against the School District property to be paid over a period of years. The comprehonslvo storm water management plan for the industrial/district area calls for development of a centralized storm water pond to be located on both school and industrial property. Zt is understood that school, city, and industrial land owners will work cooperatively toward development of this pond and other facilities serving the storm water management needs of the area. 0 Mr. Sheldon Johnson July 17, 1991 Page 3 Thank you for your efforts toward development of the understanding noted above. I will contact you regarding any additional comments that Council might have regarding the issues this letter addresses. Yours truly, CITYO FMONTIICEELLLO Je Assistant Administrator JO/kd cc: File 0/?- 'I TY OF M04TICELLO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS JULY 22, 1991 FALLON AVENUE - 91-01 BRIAR OAMES ESTATE - 91-02 CARDINAL HILLS - 91-03 PROJECT CONTINGENCY PERCENT 01 PROJECT OVERHEAD ESTIMATE 241 WORK ITEM CONST. SCHOOL VALUE PRESTIGE FARM VALUE CITY TOTAL OF SHEET COST DISTRICT PLUS BUILDERS CREDIT PLUS SOURCES 01-A NAIEP.MAIN 152,990 139,859 $0 10 $O 113,031 152.890 01-8 SANITARY SEWER $35,606 135,505 10 10 10 f0 $35,606 01-8 LIFT STATION 134,157 10 134,457 t0 t0 10 131,457 01-C RISC/RESIORATION $7,720 15,086 $0 SO $0 12,634 $7,720 01 CONTINGENCY t0 SO 10 t0 t0 f0 t0 OT OVERHEAD 131,362 119.332 18.270 {0 $0 13,760 131,362 O1 LIFT STATION PARTS 112,000 10 112,OOD t0 t0 10 112,0DO 02-D NATERMAIN 160,623 t0 10 155,158 10 SO 11,865 150,623 02-E SANITARY SEWER 153.225 SO SD 153,225 SO f0 f0 IS3,225 02-F STREET CONST. 196.735 t0 10 196,736 SO t0 $0 195.736 02-G STORM SEWER $30,693 10 10 127,016 13,647 SO 30 130,693 02 CONTINGENCY SO 10 SO 10 t0 10 10 10 0: OVERHEAD 157,905 10 10 155.664 1975 IO 51,168 157,906 03-H NATERMAIN 129,334 10 10 10 SO $29,331 $e 129,334 03-1 SANITARY SEWER 142,773 10 10 t0 $0 142,113 t0 112,713 03-1 STREET CONST. 150,303 t0 t0 t0 $0 150,303 10 150.303 03-K STORM SEWER 118.989 10 SO 10 t0 118,909 10 118,989 03 CONTINGENCY IO 10 t0 f0 10 10 10 SO 04 OVERHEAD 133,936 t0 10 10 10 133,936 10 133,935 PROJECT 91-1 TOTAL 1174,035 199,883 154.727 {0 t0 119,125 f0 1111,035 PROJECT 41.2 TOTAL 1299,183 10 10 1288,629 11,522 10 16,033 1299,183 PROJECT 11-3 TOTAL 1175.335 10 10 t0 10 1175,335 10 1175,335 IGRAND 1194,759 $6,033 1648,553 IOIAL $6a 8,553 199.803 154,727 1288,629 14.522 RAID AT CON51RUC 1101 199.883 154,121 10 SO {0 (0 {154,610 BONDING NEEDS 1260,629 14,522 1191,159 16,033 1193,943 VALUE PLUS L.O.C. 1001 151,1271 PRESTIGE BUILDERS L.O.C. 601 1173.177 PRESTIGE LOT COST - 20 LOIS 110,308 VALUE PLUS L.O.0 101 1$11,901 VAL PLUS LOT COSI - 24 LOIS $8,115 J VAL PLUS ASSESS PAYMENT 112,112 CDIAL SECURED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION $99.083 154.127 1173,111 111,901 1105,691 PERCENT OF TOTAL 52.551 TOTAL SECURED BY ASSESSMENT/LAND VALUE 1115.151 1116,056 1232,307 PERCENT OF TOTAL 35.82% TOTAL DEFFERREO ASSESSMENT OR ADVELOR 14,522 16,033 110,555 PERCENT OF TOTAL 1.631 IF IIID TARULATION 9114 F E 1'S, U'i'I 1,1'11 ES AND A PPUR'I'1, NANT WORK FALLON AVENUI?, CITY PROJECT NO. 91-01 BRIAR OAKES IsS'I'A'1'Is, CITY PROJECT' NO. 91.02 CARDINAL iiii,i S, CiT Y i-Roj (7r NO. Si -03 FOR T1)F. CITY OF momnCELI o WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA BIDS OPENED: July 19, 1991 10:00 a.m. CONTRACI'Olt 11y LL'I well r Ila rour Ktjr//,Ir�J 5 3 Lour ORR-SC11 ELEN-MAVERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 111D SECURI'l't' TOTAL, 1111) 90 ic) 1"3G.,16. ZD I JiG 7 U 3 4�'%U b ca dux; s� Com' 7`Jv �5i5n7 I I IIA(I'lll' Cl:lt'1'lFY TIIAT I'I IIS IS A TRUE, AND CORRGCI' TAIiUTAT ION (:)1'1711: MDS AS I(ECEAVI3D ON: UA'1'13: July I . 1991 11Y: Ilrel A. Weiss, P.1:. 'Demotes Corrected Figure — IOSM Cmmm, No. 48060), 4807.(1) and 481601 RESOLUTION 91 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT FOR PROJECTS 91-1, 91-2, AND 91-3, FALLON AVENUE IMPROVEMENT, BRIAR OAKES ESTATE PHASE I, AND CARDINAL HILLS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bide for the improvement of Briar Oakes Estate, Fallon Avenue from Dundas Road approximately 2000 feet southerly along Fallon Avenue, and Cardinal Hills subdivision with sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, bituminous paving, curb and gutter, and appurtenant work, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: AND WHEREAS, it appears that is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with In the name of the City of Monticello for the improvements to Briar Oakes Estate, Fallon Avenue, and Cardinal Hills according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Administrator. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposit made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted this 22nd day of July, 1991. Mayor City Administrator 0 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 13. Consideration of resolution authorizinq the issuance of general obligation improvement bonds for Proiects 91-01, 91-02, and 91-03. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Assuming that the Council has awarded a contract for improvement projects 91-01 (Fallon Avenue), 91-02 (Briar Oakes Estate), and 91-03 (Cardinal Hills) to the lowest bidder, the process for selling bonds to finance these improvement costs will have to be considered by the Council. If the contracts have been awarded, the Council is asked at this meeting to authorize Springsted, Inc., our financial advisors, to sell bonds in an amount equal to our projected project cost on Monday, August 26, 1991. Mr. Jerry Shannon of Springsted will be available at Monday night's meeting to review with the Council the proposed bond sale and financing schedule. In order to prepare for the meeting, I instructed Mr. Shannon to prepare his recommendations based on the estimated cost presented in the feasibility study for these three projects. Assuming that the City was to finance the entire project cost, Springsted has recommended a bond sale in the amount of $730,000 spread over a 10 -year time frame. While our developer agreements with Value Plus Homes for Cardinal Hills and Prestige Homes for Briar Oakes Estate are proposing an assessment period of five and seven years, there is a possibility we could shorten up our bond issue to correspond with the anticipated assessment time frame; but to allow for any unforeseen delinquencies in assessment collections, it may be to our advantage to spread the bond issue over a little longer time than the projected assessment roll. Springsted is rocommending a call feature on the bonds allowing us to pay off the issue in full in the year 1999 if we should have collected all our assessments prior to this date. There does not appear to be much difference in the projected interest rate of our bond issue by going to ten years rather than, say, seven years. As I indicatod, the recommendations are based on the total project cost but will be modified to reflect the actual bid prices we receive Friday morning. In addition, it appears that the bond issue can be lowered substantially from $730,000 to reflect the fact that the school district and Value Plus Homes will be up -fronting approximately $190,000, which will not require us to bond for this amount. The up -front monoy and the projected cost of the improvements based on the actual bide will be reflected in the actual bond issue, the amount to be determined later. P`•� (� 5)S pJ0 27 j� Council Agenda - 7/22/91 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: �L (/ iL the improvement project contracts are awarded, Council can authorize Springsted, Inc., to proceed with the 7/I issuance of bonds to finance the improvement project jbased on the actual bid prices minus any upfront money expected. 2. Do not issue bonds --this is not a feasible alternative unless the projects or portions thereof have been cancelled. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In order to obtain funds for the anticipated construction cost payments, the Council should on Monday night authorize the issuance of bonds. Funds will not be available until late September, but this should not cause a problem with our cash flow. The bond issue amount should be adjusted to reflect the actual bid prices and any up -front funds provided by developer and school. Although our assessment rolls for these projects will be five and seven years, it may be wise to structure the bond Salo over ten years. Mr. Jerry Shannon will address this issue also Monday evening. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of recommendations for bond sale. P 0,6 D 61 " - � P_ t"11- 10 1 �L citi 28 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 14. Consideration of outside storage of construction equipment. Applicant, Floyd Kruse. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Attached you will find the staff report to Planning Commission regarding the Floyd Kruse outside storage of equipment issue. Planning Commission reviewed the report and recommended that Council take legal action to enforce the ordinance based on their finding that outside storage of equipment and use of the site as a staging area for the asphalt paving process is not appropriate at the site. The Planning Commission did not see the need to establish an interim ordinance providing for short-term use of property in a manner inconsistent with the governing zoning district. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: See attached Planning Commission supplement alternative actions. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation noted above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Staff report to Planning Commission. 29 Planning Commission Agenda - 7/9/91 tt. Consideration of establishing a recoimnendation to Council reqardinq outside storage of construction equipment. Applicant, Floyd Kruse. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As you may have already noticed, a collection of construction equipment and other materials is being stored on a vacant parking lot across from the Bondhus Manufacturing facility. The site, formerly known as "Dino's Other World," is being used as a staging area for an asphalt paving company. The office for this business is being operated out of a residence in the community. A few weeks ago the City Council was informed that this operation is in violation of the City zoning ordinance, as outside storage of equipment is not allowed in the PZM zone. Incidentally, outside storage of equipment without a principal use such as an office building is not allowed in any district. In reviewing the matter, Mayor Maus noted that the property is located next to a wastewater treatment plant, thereby reducing its value for residential uses, and commercial use at this time does not appear to be viable. The site features a blacktop surface that is well suited for storage of this type of equipment, and it probably is possible to Screen the equipment sufficiently. In response to the information presented, Council requested that the Planning Commission review the matter and provide a recommendation to Council regarding the matter. Attached you will find the information that was given to Council prior to their decision to bring this matter before the Planning Commission. Following are possible general alternatives that the Planning Commission may wish to consider. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Perhaps the site could be rezoned from its present PZM use, which is a low -intensity commercial/residential use, to an industrial use (I-1), which would be consistent with the industrial use across the street at the Bondhus Corporation. In addition, an ordinance amendment would need to be developed that would allow outside storage without a principal use in an I-1 zone. City staff has reviewed this matter in some detail, and we have found that it may be very difficult to allow this typo of use to occur at this site without creating a Planning Commission Agenda - 7/9/91 negative precedent. For instance, if the property is rezoned from PZM to I-1, and if the I-1 zoning regulations are adjusted so that outside storage of equipment is allowed without a principal use, then this opens up the door to outside storage in other I -I areas. Creating the opportunity for use of property for outside storage without a principal use would result in an under utilization of land which would threaten the potential tax base or tax revenue that would normally be derived from the site. It does not make sense to provide the opportunity to tie up industrial land for outside storage when such use of the land will generate minimal taxes and could result in depreciation in adjoining land values; therefore, this particular option that would enable the outside storage to occur at this site and all I-1 districts does not appear desirable. 2. Another option might be to amend the regulations pertaining to the PZ*4 zoning district, which would allow outside storage of equipment as a conditional use in the PZM zone. Again, although outside storage of equipment may not appear entirely objectionable at this location, in other PZM zones any other outside storage of any sort could prove to be very objectionable to neighbors and could result in reduction in land values, etc. It is, therefore, recommended that the Planning Commission not adjust the PZM zoning regulations so as to allow this type of use. 3� If it appears reasonable to the Planning Commission that the current use of the land for outside storage is reasonable in the short term under certain conditions, then the Planning Commission may wish to consider enacting an amendment to the zoning ordinance which would allow for interim uses of the land. Under this alternative, a zoning ordinance amendment would be adopted that would allow land to be used in a manner that is not consistent with the zoning district in which the use is occurring. This "non -conforming" use of the land would be an "interim" or short-term use that is limited in terms of the length of time that the non- conforming use would be allowed to operate. In addition, the non -conforming interim use would need to comply with conditions or performance standards defined by the City. Establishing an ordinance allowing for interim uses of the land is a fairly standard component of zoning 24 1j Planning Commission Agenda - 7/9/91 ordinances adopted by other cities; therefore, establishment of this provision in the ordinance would not be unusual. Under this alternative, the applicant would apply for permission to use the land as proposed on an interim basis. An agreement would then need to be struck between the City and Kruse regarding the interim use. This agreement would include terms that we often associate with conditional use permits; however, under this situation, the interim use would terminate after a pre- established date. The other alternative, of course, would be to hold firm to the existing zoning ordinance and enforce the rules and regulations in place, which -would ultimately result in the removal of the equipment. If the Planning Commission does not feel that there is sufficient merit in the case supportiag continuation of the use of the property as proposed, then this alternative should be selected. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that an ordinance amendment be adopted allowing for interim uses of land which would enable the property owner to use the property for outside storage of equipment. This recommendation is made only under the following conditions: 1) complete screening of the site must be achieved through a combination of fencing, landscape plantings, or berming. If the property owner is not willing to provide the screening material necessary to adequately shroud the site from the right-of-way, and if he is unwilling to comply with other requirements noted, then City staff would recommend that the zoning ordinance be maintained as is and that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that it take legal action to remove the equipment being illegally stored on the site; 2) No dumping or filling would be allowed without a separate excavation permit; ]) No sale of vehicles would be allowed from the site; 4) The interim use should be allowed for a period of one year with annual renewal considered thoroafter. SUPPORTING DATA: Staff supplement to City Council; Council meeting minutes of the meeting hold May 28, 1991; Copy of proposed ordinance amendment. 29 CIP, F040 Council Agenda - 5/28/91 Consideration of authorizing legal action to remove construction equipment illegally stored on vrooerty located in a PZM zoning district. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As you have probably noticed, a large collection of construction equipment related to the asphalt paving process is being stored on property along Highway 75 across from Bondhus Corporation. Equipment repair, oil changing, and vehicle sales are also being conducted at the site. The site is zoned for PZM uses, and in the PZM zoning district there is no provision for outside storage of construction equipment. City staff has taken the initiative to bring this item before Council because the activity is in violation of the ordinance and because the City has received complaints regarding the presence of the construction equipment at one of the major entrances to the city. City staff discussed this matter with Floyd Kruse, the property owner, and Lee Larson, the owner of the equipment. Larson indicated that he needs 60 days to relocate the equipwont to another site. Floyd Kruse indicated that he has allowed the equipment to be stored there because he was informed by the Building Inspector some time ago that it would be okay to locate a single truck and trailer on the site; and because the Building Inspector allowed placement of a single small storage shed on the site, apparently Kruse and Larson interpreted this approval as the okay to store numerous pieces of construction equipment. Obviously, the Building Inspector's informal approval of a short-term use of the property for parking of a truck did not constitute an approval to place numerous construction vehicles on the site. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to authorize City staff to take legal action to force removal of equipment stored illegally on a site located in a PZM zone. Action is to be taken if the equipment is not removed within 60 days. Under this alternative, Council would grant the property owner time necessary to find another parking spot for the construction equipment. As was noted earlier, the Building Inspector did provide a limited approval allowing storage of a single vehicle at the site. If Council is concerned that this approval did somehow cause Kruse and Larson to think that numerous vehicles could be parked on the site, then Council may wish to grant Larson 60 days to find a new place to park his equipment. ON Council Agenda - 5/28/91 Mr. Larson did indicate that he would be able to relocate the equipment in 60 days. If he is true to his word, the City may save legal expenses associated with taking legal action sooner. If Council selects this option, we should get Larson's 60 -day commitment to remove the equipment in writing. 2. Motion to authorize staff to take legal action if the equipment is not removed within 15 days. Under this alternative, Council could take the position that the presence of the vehicles at this site is in violation of the ordinance, and there is no reason to delay enforcement; therefore, the City should take legal action immediately. Encourage the contractor to apply for a zoning ordinance amendment which would allow the placement of vehicles at this location. If Council feels that the storage of vehicles at this location does not present a blighting influence or would not create a problem in other PZM areas in town, then the applicant should be encouraged to obtain a zoning ordinance amendment which would allow the present use of the property to continue. This does not appear to be a feasible option, as to allow vehicles to be stored at this site would open the door to similar uses in other PZM areas. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council give Kruse/Larson 60 days to remove the equipment from the site. It is our view that the storage of construction equipment in the PZM zone should not be allowed; however, requiring the immodiato removal of the equipment may not be necessary, as the presence of the vehicles at the site does not create a health and safety problem. Also, there is evidence that the Building Inspector did not completely discourage the use of this site for storage of equipment; therefore, we may have led the applicant to believe that this property could be used for storage of vehicles. Finally, the applicant has indicated that he would be willing and able to remove the equipment in 60 days. If the applicant is true to his word, the City can save legal expenses associated with taking legal action immediately. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Please refer to your zoning ordinance if you would like more information on uses allowed in the PZM zone. L Council Minutes - 5/28/91 Consideration of authorizing lecal action to remove constriction ecuioment illecally stored on orocerty located in a PZM zoning district. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that a large collection of construction equipment related to the asphalt paving process io being stored on property along Highway 75 across from the Bondhus Corporation. Equipment repair, oil changing, and vehicle sales are also being conducted at this site. O'Neill noted that the site is zoned for PZM uses. In the PZM zoning district there is no provision for outside storage of construction equipment. In addition, O'Neill noted that the City has received complaints regarding the presence of the construction equipment at one of the major entrances to the city. O'Neill went on to ask the City Council to consider further action regarding the matter. Floyd Kruse, owner of the property, indicated that he has leased the property to Lee Larson and has allowed the equipment to be stored there because he was informed by the Building Inspector that the property could be used for such purposes. O'Neill noted that the Building Inspector may have given approval to store a single dump truck at the site some time ago; however, this informal approval should not be construed as approval to storo tho numerous vehicles and other equipment at the site. Mayor Maus noted that the site may be difficult to develop under the PZM zoning district because of its nearness to the wastewater treatment plant. In addition, it might be possible that this area might be better zoned for industrial uses. Maus also suggested that some type of screening could possibly be used to obscure the view of the construction equipment from the street. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan Blonigen to submit this item to the Planning Commission for further review. Motion carried unanimously. 6 f G v✓ 1e. RDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH ST. PAUL BY ADDING SECTION 315.12 AUTHORIZING INTERIM USE PERMITS AND AMENDING SECTION 315.11 BY PROVIDING THE FEE FOR AN APPLICATION FOR At4 INTERIM USE PERMIT. The City Council of the City of South St. Paul does ordain: Section I. That the Municipal Code be, and hereby is, amended by adding Section 315.12, as follows: `315.12 Interim Use Permit. (1) Definition. Interim use: a temporary use of property until a particular date, until the occurrence of a particular event, or until zoning regulations no longer permit it. (2) Permit. The City Council may grant an Interim Use Permit for the interim use of property if: (a) the use conforms to the zoning regulations; (b) the date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty; (c) permit of the use will not impose additional costs on the City if it is necessary for the City to take the property in the future; and (d) the user agrees in writing to any conditions that l the City Council deems appropriate for permission of the use. (3) Hearing. Upon receipt of an application for an Interim Use Permit from the City Clerk, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the application following notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten days prior to the day of the hearing. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall forward its recommendation to the City Council. (4) Application. An application for an Interim Use Permit shall be on such form as prescribed by the City Clerk; filed with the City Clerk; and accompanied by payment of the applicable fee. (5) Permit Termination. An Interim Use Permit may be terminated by a change in zoning regulations which prohibits the interim use.' Section II. That Section 315.11 of the Municipal Code be, and hereby is, amended by adding subsection (4), as follows: (4) Application for Interim Use Permit . . . $75.00.' Section III. This ordinance shall be in force and effect after its passage, approval and publication. ID13561M Council Agenda - 7122191 15. Council Update --Review status of Evergreens residential subdivision --No action requested. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The following memo attempts to provide Council with information regarding the current status of the Evergreens development. In this memo I will attempt to describe some important Issues that Council will be asked to formally address at an upcoming meeting. The need to review these issues now has been brought about by the impending development of phase I of the Evergreens subdivision, which consists of 42 residential lots in the northeast corner of the total property owned by Kent Kjellberg. Before I outline the issues, I would like to provide a brief history of the project. The Evergreens preliminary plat was approved in May of 1989. The area encompasses approximately 90 acres and includes development of 236 lots. The original plan called for development of the Evergreens over five phases. Of the five phases, only phase I received final plat approval. Due to problems in obtaining financing, phase I was never constructed. In addition, the approval period for. pleases II through V has lapsed, which means that phases II tt.rough V must go through the preliminary platting process. Council could view this as an opportunity to require changes to be made to the preliminary plat for phases I1 through V approved in 1969. It nog, appears that phase I utilities will be constructed soon. John Peterson of Good Value Homes is purchasing phase I of the Evergreens and proposes to develop one-half of the lots outlined in phase I. This project is to be completed under a private improvement process under terms associated with an agreement that was approved by Council in May of 1989. Mr. Peterson has requested that the terms of the agreement be modified so as to allow him to develop only one-half of the lots. City staff and attorney have no problem with this request as long as restrictive covenants are in place that restrict the sale of undeveloped but platted lots. As with any agreement, when one party wishes to amend the agreement, the other party then has the option of reviewing the agreement to soe if there is anything that is worth amending. City staff reviewed the agreement and noted that under the original plan, the park dedication provision called for tho City acquiring a largo place of land on the southorn porimoter of the property for park land. This is a poor location for the park relative to phase I, and It is encumbered by power linos. Again, this may be an opportunity for the City to reject the original proposal for a park being located in this 30 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 area and instead require that Peterson provide a cash payment in lieu of the park dedication. Subsequent development of the Kjell.berg property would then be redesigned to include park land in a more favorable position in the development area. Addit.ionally, the plat might be redesigned to include an improved east/west boulevard passing through the development. What staff would like to tell Council is that the City has an oppor tunity at this time to improve the plat layout by requiring that amendments be made to the second through fifth additions of the Evergreens. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Provide general direction to staff and Kjellberg indicating that Council is not likely to accept the preliminary plat if resubmitted for phases II through V as currently designed, and direct City staff to amend the l f development agreement with Good Value Homes to require Sfl that the City obtain cash in lieu of land for park dedication purposes. Under this alternative, it is likely that the City will be engaged in a lawsuit. Kent Kjellberg will claim that he has relied on the development agreement during his negotiations on the sale of the first phase, and he has relied on the approval of the City Council that the preliminary plat for phases I1 through V is acceptable Indefinitely. We have been Informed by the City Attorney �i that we must adhere to the approval of the final plat for l\� 1 V 11 . t r phase I and to most of the terms in the original development agreement; however, we are not bound to approving the original design of the remainder of the Evorgroons. From an ethical standpoint, City Council may be uncomfortable with abandoning the design already V r +� `V + approved. One could say that a deal is a deal, and now Council may not wish to change the action of a previous Council. However, there is a reason why there is a time limit on the viability of preliminary plat approvals. Situations and city needs can change; and Councils change, thereby creating now factors to be considered whon finally approving tho original plat. In this situation, the school facilities aro growing to the east, and residential development is beginning to flourish as wall. The need for a boulevard cutting through this development to points east has been morn clearly demonstrated by this development and by the plane that have boon prepared by the City Planner. 31 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 Furthermore, the Parks Commission has reviewed the City's park situation and has strongly recommended that Council not take park under power lines or take park that is surrounded by residential properties. The park proposed in the Evergreens is partially under the power line and is surrounded by residences. Council may wish to modify this alternative by authorizing staff to negotiate with the developer. Perhaps Council would wish to assist in financing the cost to make some of the changes to the plat and amendments to the engineering plans that would accomplish the design changes proposed. Authorize staff to execute the development agreement with the City obtaining the park land as originally proposed; however, indicate to Kjellberg that phases II through V will need to go through the preliminary plat process again, and it is likely that they will not be approved without inclusion of a thoroughfare. Under this alternative, some of the same factors and implications are present as with the first alternative; however, under this alternative, the City would accept the park land as required under the development agreement. The new plat design would need to be built around the park land provided. Inform staff that the original proposal is satisfactory and that the preliminary plat approved in 1989 may be maintained. Under this alternative, Council takes the position that the City is obligated to fulfill the plan as prepared in 1989. Under this alternative, Council would be accepting the preliminary plat as it now exists and all the future problems associated with poor accoss through the development and poor park development. This alternative, however, would eliminate the possibility of a legal battle. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council should be aware that the deal between Kent Kjellberg and John Peterson is not jeopardized by adoption of alternative tl or #2. His project will likely go forward whothor or not the City approves phases II through V as originally proposod. At the time this memo is being written, a firm recommendation from the City Attorney regarding the City's ability to deny approval of phases II through V is not available. It is the City Attorney's preliminary opinion that the City is not 32 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 obligated to approve phases II through V. The ordinance appears to be very clear cut in this regard. However, the development agreement with phase I talks about phases II through V; therefore, in some respects the City may be bound to approving phases II through V because of the design of the development agreement. The City Attorney will be exploring these issues and will be providing an update accordingly. City staff is not convinced that the existing plat design will result in development of the area in a manner that is in the best interest of the property involved, nor is it designed in the best interest of the area in general. Park land being under the power line and surrounded by residences is poorly designed. It needs to be toward the center of the project area and should be bounded at least on two sides by roadways. The plat shows "May" Road as the major road cutting through the development, which would be connected to school boulevard. This road has individual driveway accesses leading onto it, which will be creating significant traffic problems for those that wish to use school boulevard to get to Highway 25. In addition, due to the curves in the road, it is not likely that this avenue will become an attractive alternative for thoso that wish to get to the School District property from the city proper; therefore, this roadway will not act to relieve pressure from the Highway 25/Chelsea Road intersection. According to tho planner, it is important that the school boulevard be an attractive alternative to the Chelsea Road corridor for providing access to the southeast portion of the city. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution from Parks Commission recommending that Council not take land under power lines for park dedication purposes; Copy of Exhibit A (preliminary plat); Copy of Chelsoa area land use and circulation study; Copy of newspaper article on park facilities; Copy of May 20, 1991, letter to Kent Kjellberg. 33 PARKS COMMISSION RESOLUTION 1991-1 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DEVELOPMENT OF PARK SPACE UNENCUMBERED BY POWER LINES AND POOR PUBLIC ACCESS WHEREAS, the Parks Commission has been duly appointed by the City Council to review and comment on parks facilities issues, and WHEREAS, the Parks Commission has reviewed all existing park facilities in the city of Monticello, and WHEREAS, the Parks Commission has noted that existing parks developed under power lines are not fully developable for park purposes, as trees, overhead lighting, and park structures are not allowed under power lines, and WHEREAS, parks under power lines are limited in terms of the type of park activities that may be conducted, and WHEREAS, parks under power lines do not create a pleasing recreational environment which results in under -utilization by the public they are intended to service, and WHEREAS, parks located in residential areas without sufficient public access create park user/neighbor conflicts, and WHEREAS, development of usable recreation space is a need in a growing community. THE PARKS COMMISSION HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the Planning Commission and City Council deny approval of any preliminary or final plat that includes development of park land that is under power lines or bounded on more than two aides by residences. Adopted this 17th day of July, 1991. Chairperson ATTEST: 0 / EXHIBIT A t�NASr i F,.M t 00.4 Ae�,r,.coi oil � 11 • 2..y/q�tteop O•tl;M Pia{ 1 r O�S 54.. jP /d 7ro.,t — NeecR S is be re•C.1:r�.• C /' U City of Monticello Chelsea Area Land Use and Circulation Study Proposed Transportation Weftlale hee-ay 92 M , W i r ._ .'{; ti.r- �sRn 1'It 't' •,�' ,y, e.r Nn..� 'v :`j11'(yr 71,,C r+v c' . t, . Y :'1. ( �•i °' ...' 7 f •I : y �,1 ' t t . ,. .. : +i -. .... • `f .. ...- o.+. r _ ..._ v3[lraW.: ,::�..t :a.�afv� - � .. _ _�..� :.3:i�`: ... . +w, Staff Photo by Jolly Holt ` It Was bettor up at Wyndham Knoll Perk in Edon Prairie, but not everyone's a tan. Some suburban residents say organized sports are ovartadng their smell neighborhood perkc f itis all happening at the park Suburbs are pinched as just about everyone wants to play ball I By Norman Not— orange umfurms ort up to hal pork thistpnng. The Palling Int park sta0s are improv nmg to worn rvrn )ea and, a Wyntthom Stan ii lila agamic the slurs 4 dozen or so often os'ert t Lt,enmgs have handle nsmg demand, and knoll pa 'k. —r thml the part has sprnauus have settled Into lawn gotten noniel. and nnghMrhood prospects fvu rehef are uncertain Men lost to the whims of organised This(...uld M a suburban td)ll chars fur the best seats m the Ards his been en replaced on the hall hawball house, i at behind the hacksiop diamond by uniformed itrangrri "The demands for all inns of It's o�,inr umn.. rvrntng in rerrratmu nal fahties and activities I'drn Prairie of iriah sq mpmhiie, Uro Pr arnr tumewherr among Hut to some nngor hIsm, the tableau 1 he u) is similar in man) other isjust ouistnpping a tommuml)'s but the?',, to a quandan the well Arpt homes a lawn mower m W )ndham knoll Purl appear grow mg, outel•nng Two Cwts ability to prottttr them," said Duh Organised youth buthall tGnms .� Is when cog In 5hr nrrghtwlhc nd mom a preh7nn than an rd)tf subur ha l.argr cummunu) earls Svehla. Conn Raptds oq manager have mushroomed and all those ` pnrA',. lot h laps up agannl the w nh muhrI., hasrhal diamonds hal A lap a ytiunCtl[n rn T hes honied the t hanger at the and pia) inp hclds air Mwied up, In I den Plane the per» urr pets 1"6116 tonlinurd on page 5H sva+' hOUX3 Un wCCkCnd3 UI hUlllla)3 >lJ ll' „ii,,,� �. ................0 Presents an administrative problem and on statistics that indicate that the ertdence itnat Jul... • 11 ren. �.... as well as an extra expense because death penalty does not deter crimes. uatly assaulted or whether tier holy facilities have reduced staffs on those in fact, states that allow capital pun- as clothed when found hs police. days: Carlson said that if legal re- ishment tend to be those with the watch reveals that no variance in highest crime rates. Carlson said. The St. Cloud Times reported yester. Park/ Demand is squeezing suburbs Continued from page IB outstripping park resources. Eagan Slaking the situation more also has felt the crunch. uncomfortable for cities with kids have to play somewhere. But crowded parks is the hue and cry for park resources haven't grown ennugh Kenneth Vma, Eagan parks and more services. to meet the need.so games must be scheduled for small neighborhood parks that were never intended to handle them. "It's a no-win deal at this point." said Bob Lambert. Eden Prairie director ofparks, recreation and natural frigurces. In 19815. 550 kids played on organized baseball teams, lambert said. This year, 1.700 Eden Prairie youths participate in organized baseball. One hundred more were turned away. Enrollment could exceed 3.000 by 199 S. lambert said. The city has had to draft Wyndham Knoll Park as the site for games several nights a week and on Saturdays for pan of the summer. Many of the park's neighbors don't like it. "W hat's vexing to us is the park is no Ibnger available to the people for whom it was intended, which is the neighborhood kids." said Andrea Bez, whose property abuts the park. Irked by the added noise and traffic, neighbors petitioned the City Council to restrict youth games at the park. ;hot position didn't get much sympathy from Ken Foote, a director on the board of the Eden Prairie Baseball Association. "My question to these people is, if this is your park, where is my parkT' Foote said. "I don't live on a park, .. We're asking for use of the park only 19 percent of the time." Restricting use of the site, Foote said, would force the association to cut participation in the program. The council declined to restrict games at Wyndham Knoll Park, Lambert mid, but it also assigned the ciiy t park staffs daunting task: figure out a way to accommodate all the city's organized %pont. Iden Prairie is not tha only suburb faced with demand that's recreation director, said there are 29 mon organized youth sports teams in the city this year than last year, but no new fields have been added, Thais because the city grew 129 Percent in the 1990s, for more than anticipated, and bemuse of the boom in organized youth spons. "What we found historically is that kids didn't start playing soccer till the fourth grade." Vma said. "Now they've moved those programs down to the first- and second-grade levels." In Apple Valley. the demand for playing fields has grown to the point where "it couldn't get much tighter," said Randy Johnson. Apple Valley parks and recreation director. Apple Valley officials dream of building a 60.acre complex of multiple -use fields to accommodate soccer, baseball, softball and football. But she facility's $3 million cost makes the city reluctant to go to the voters for the money. "We don't want to raise taxes. - obviously." Johnson said. Neighboring Burnsville is in a similar pickle. but parks and recreation director Randy Oppell said the city probably will try a referendum for more money in 1992 or 1993. Even some communities with steady or declining populations — Minnespoln and Roseville, for instance —lied their resources being taxed by greater demand. That demand isn't restricted to city parks. Although its more rural parks stiff aren't being used much, overall use of Ifennepin Caunty regional pnrksdoubled during the 1981h. That creates a greater need for swimming beaches, trails and picnic areas in its suburban parks, lfennepin Parks adopted several marketing strategies last year to draw visitors away from its crowded suburban parks toward the rural parks. Those include lower fen for picnic site reservation%, and discount coupons. Eagan's Vraa said that when he attends his son's baseball games. parents recognize him and pester him for more playing fields. In Eden Prairie, Lambert said. she hockey association and figure skating association want a second ice rink, and the swimming club wants more time at the city pool. About once a month, he said, there'sa petition for new trails . Not all metro area suburbs are in din straits Plymouth built six athletic completes in 1990 and recently broke ground on two more, enough to keep up with the nerd. said Eric Blank. the city's parksand recreation director. Woodbury community development d9rcctor I'fwight Picah said Woodbury parks have been able to keep up with the demand. But unlike some other communities. Woodbury planned for its neighborhood pans to accommodate organized sports. In Eden Prairie, planners are pinning their hopes on a new park that will hold four softball diamonds, five baseball diamonds and six fields for toccer and football. But the cost is 93.5 million, and getting the money means winning valet approval through a referendum, probably next year. Two park proposals were defeated in referendums in recent years, although both lost by narrow margins. E+'en if voters approve, lambert said, the park wouldn*1 open until 1994. That, he said. means the neighbors of Wyndham Knoll Park Pro bly wiff have to put up wish noise, traffic and all those uniformed kids for some time. "Quite frankly, they're going to have tot used to the noise and the ,rate.- lambert said. "Because we dont we any way around that for a tong time to coma" Cif ftie rtf the Cit, Administrator 150 East Rroaduay May 20, 1991 Monticello, MN 55362.9245 Phone: (612) 295.2711 Metro: 1612) 333.5739 Mr. Kent Kjellberg 1000 Kjellberg's Park Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Phase I development --Evergreens plat Dear Kent: After further review of our subdivision ordinance, it is my opinion that the final plat for phase I of the Evergreens subdivision can be considered valid hAaed upon the May 8, 1989, Council approval, which was subject to the successful completion of the environmental assessment worksheet review process and subject to necessary modifications of easement lines associated with preparation of final plans for phase i public improvements. As noted in the Evergreens development agreement also approved on May 8, 1989, the final plat for phase I as submitted must be recorded, and all legal, administration, and engineering expenses incurred by the City will be required to be paid in full before the plat will be signed by City officials. Prior to any improvements being constructed for the phase I development, the conditions noted in the developers agreement will have to be adhered to by either yourself or your assigns. If any changes are being proposed to the development agreement, the entire development agreement would again have to be reviewed and approved by the City Council. W hile the final plat for phase I has been approved by the City, it should be noted that since final plats for additional phases were not submitted within one year of the preliminary plat approval, all additional phases will require Planning Commission and Council review before recording. With over two years' time lapsing since the preliminary plat was approved, I am sure the Planning Commission and City Council will want to review the remainder of the Evergreens plat for conformance to our. comprehensive plan, Including park dedication, roadways, or other factors which may affect the future phases. 0 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 16. Consideration of establishinq animal impoundment fee schedule. (R.W.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: For a number of years the City of Monticello has contracted with 11 cities and townships surrounding Monticello providing animal impoundment services to these communities. Our agreements with these communities provide for housing of the animals to meet the state -required holding period and if the animal is not claimed by the owner, disposal through adoption or euthanization. From July 1, 1990, through July 1991, the City has charged $7.25 per day for housing and if the animal is not claimed, $16 for disposal. With the City's cost Increasing, it is suggested that the fee schedule for housing and also the disposal charge be increased to cover our cost. Our animal control officer has surveyed veterinary clinics and other communities and organizations that provide housing for animals and has found a wide range of daily charges between $6 and $10 per day. Typically, veterinarians will provide this service for their clients on a limited basis primarily for a kennel service for vacations, etc., and their charqes range from $8 to $10 per day. Most veterinarians do not provide this service for a large number of animals, more as a convenience for their customers. The Wright County Humane society also provides impoundment services to a few communities in southern Wright County and charges $6 per day. With our animal control contract increasing approximately 7.98, it is recommended that our daily fee also be increased from $7.25 to either $7.50 or $7.75 per day. An increase to $7.75 would amount to approximately a 6.9% increase. Our veterinarian fees for animal euthanization will also increase to $18 from $16, which will be automatically passed on to contracting communities. There are really two thoughts on the foo increase for animal housing. If the daily charge is increased too much, contracting communities may see an advantage to implementing thoir own program or finding another location for housing their animals. The City of Monticello would lose some revenue but would probably not see a corresponding drop in our expenditures except for minor items such as dog food, etc. On the other hand, if our animal shelter is becoming too crowded and we reach a point where we have to consider relocating or oxpanding the facility to handle all of the contracting communities, it may be advantageous to keep the fee for daily housing at a higher level to somewhat discourage too many animals being brought in. At this point, we are still able to manage the 11 communities and townships' animals; but if we do got too crowded, we may have to consider increasing the fee if Council Agenda - 7/22/91 we have to spend money for capital improvements. It should be noted that If the same number of animals are housed as during the past 12 months (approximately 400), the city anticipates an increase in revenue of over $3,000 based on a $.50 per day increase in the fee and because of a state requirement that the animals be kept an additional day longer before disposal. The increase, coupled with the extra day, could amount to approximately $3,100 additional revenue. In light of this, the charge to a community for an unclaimed animal that is disposed of by the City will cost the contracting community $72.25 versus $59.50 previously. This is another reason why you may not want to increase the fee more than $.50 at this time. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Increase the fee for animal housing impoundment charges from $7.25 per day to $7.75. This would amount to a 6.9% increase and should adequately cover our cost increase for the next year. 2. Increase the daily charge to $7.50, which is approximately a 3-1/28 increase. While this is less than our anticipated cost increases, the additional one day that animals have to be kept will still provide additional revenue to more than offset our cost increase. 3. Increase the daily charge _")or or more. While this �( charge would—be more in fine with what a veterinarian clinic might charge, it could reduce the number of communities contracting with the City and encourage communities to look elsewhere for cost savings. At the present time, we are able to handle all of the animals brought in by other communities; but when we react the point where expansion may be noodod, this might be an alternative to consider. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: During the previous years, we have normally been increasing our foes approximately S. 50 per day annually, and I believe an increase from $7.25 to $7.75 would still be appropriate. This would be an increase of approximately 6.9%, which seems in lino with our cost increase for next year. SUPPORTING DATA: None. 35 Council Agenda - 7/22/91 17. Consideration of Wright County State Bank using streetscape bridge railinq sections alonq Hiqhwav 25 and in their parkinq lot. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Wright County State Bank has requested the use of two refurbished bridge railing sections to be placed on the Highway 25 right-of-way on the west side of their parking lot. In addition to a few spare refurbished bridge railings, the City has two sections which were not installed with the streetscape project due to protests from adjoining property owners. One was to be installed in front of Golden Valley Furniture along Broadway, the other one was to be installed in front of Holkers drive-in, now the Kodak Image Center. We could utilize these sections on Highway 25 and still maintain our inventory of spare sections. In addition, the bank would like to use four sections or 36 feet of non -refurbished lattice work from the bridge railing. The lattice work was the lower section of the bridge railing or kick panel and was removed during the refurbishment for the streetscape railing. Each section is approximately 9 feet long and i foot high. The bank is requesting four sections or 36 feet. We have approximately 400 feet of lattice work. This lattice work was saved so that the bridge railing theme in the downtown area could be extended to other areas, possibly along Walnut Street toward the mall in the future. The City has invested approximately $500 in each of the refurbished bridge railing sections. Our investment in each section of the lattice work is probably around $75. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to allow the bank to install two refurbished bridge railings along Highway 25 r 1 and to utilize four sections of lattice work within the 7 t� parking lot, all at no cost. 2. The second alternative would be to allow the bank to Install two refurbished bridge railings along Highway 25 �1 and to utilize four sections of lattice work within the parking lot and charge 20% of the value of the refurbished railing (20% was original streetscape assessment) and 104% of the value of the lattice work for a total of $500. 36 Council Agenda - 7/22/41 The third alternative would be to allow the bank to use the refurbished bridge railing for free but to charge for the value of the lattice work. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the staff's opinion that use of the two extra sections of bridge railing along Highway 25 will complement the streetecape system, and it is an appropriate use. In addition, since the lattice work will be visible from the intersection (even though it's placed along the east end of the parking lot along the theater sidewalk), it will also enhance the streetecape theme of the area. Since the bank property, which was Stokes Marine and the old National Bushing property, had already been assessed for streetecape, it may not be appropriate to assess the 201 for the refurbished bridge railing since that would result in an assessment along two sides of the property. It does seem appropriate, however, to recover some monies for use of the lattice work on private property. Bearing this in mind, alternative #3 appears to be most appropriate. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of bridge railing detail showing lattice work. 37 a� a e.. m ¢. m 3- °C M1o• 6 $•a al rs . 6=0- it ao4?' r e r r n� ' 1 C9K. Mot:- P • S- r �' • U+ D.et rT II l lt. D9r-q wine Ic • --r u._. , •. `-.. . '=-fit •.� I �, � ��\.' � \ � ,I �I� �\ I I /�i\•�I. / I I '\' Tye �� �. � •.i. 'I gr xg l�•��j\\\` /:`� .\•„ _ 1, \, !\ � /�I I/• I /�\ ��/I 2i I \I I�, i/:' I. jam. " R9 2e • �Q a•i�� 1' �.2 V '2 Baa_ p� ;a1L Cr It.T��.,,tC�a� Z --JL GANr Merez 10 'yrs RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 06/26/91 15:14:14 Dte0ur9ement Journal WAP.P.AN1 OATS VFNDOP OESC.RIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM I11 V•?I'. 'GENERAL CHECKING 31771 06/21/91 AME READY mrY 8 CORRECT COOING 76.46r,P ' 3 172 1 06/21/91 AME READY MIA 8 CORRECT CODING 74,46 .. 0.00 -CHECK TOTAL 31755 06/21/91 MARTIE IS FARM SERVIC 107 CHECK_VOIOED 20.90CR 31759 Or)/? 1191 MAP IIE'S FARM SERVIC 107 CHECK VOIDED 23.70CR 31755 06/21/91 MARTIE'S'PARM SERVIC• 107 CHECK VOIDED P.70CR 3,759 06/21/91 MAPTIE'S FARM SERVIC 107 CHECK VOIDED 33.00,:R 31755 06/21/91 MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC 107 CHECK VOIDED 22.52CR ' 118.48CR •CMEC¢ TOTAL 31792 06/21/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAFT REG h TITL 155.00 31793 00/21/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 110 WATERCRAFT/SNOW REG 370.00 31794 06/21/01 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF 174, INSURANCE PREMIUM 40.00 31795 06/21/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 168 UTILITIES 2.090.90 31795 06/21/01 NORTHERN STATES ROWE 168 UTILITIES •-' 165.73 31795 00/21/91 NORTHERN STATES ROWE 148 UTILITIES 3.755.52 31705 06/21/91 NORTHERN STATES ROWE 140 UTILITIES 77.44 31795 06/21/91 NORTHERN STATES ROWE 166 UTILITIES •• 384.10 31705 06/21/01 NORTHERN STATES ROWE 148 UTILITIES, 17.55 31795 06/71/91 JJOPTHFPN STATES ROWE 160 UT,ILITLIES '-" 148.90 31705 06/21/01 NORrHERN STATES ROWE 148 UTILITIES 12.08 31795 00/71/91 NORTHERN STATES iOWE 148 UTILITIES 710.56 C31795 00/21/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE' 140 UTILITIES 217.90 i 3, 9 79 00/2,/91 ,IORTAE AN STATES ROWE 160 UTILITIES 602.07 31705 06/21/01 1JOPTHERII STATES ROWE' 168 UTILITIES. 875.40 • 8.995.20 •CMECK TOTAL 31796 06/21/91 STEVE 8 KARLA SOQCHS�.00160 RECYCLING PRIZE $0.00 31797 00/21/91 JAN IRVINE .90139 RECYCLING PRIZE 75.00 31700 06/,21/01 ARNOLO/MARY 546 INFO CENTER SALARY 133.9B 31798 00/21/91 ARNOLO/MARY 540 I14FO CENTER'SALAP.V 66.IOCR 00.70 -CHECK TOTAL 31799 00/21/91 HAVES/WILMA 31700 06/21/01 HAVE$/VILMA 31000 08/21/01 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 31001 00/21/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 31802 00/21/01 SCHAROER A $ONS. INC 209 INFO CENTER SALARY 173.79 705 INFO CENTER SALARY 40.80CR 02.05 -CHECK TOTAL 110 WATERCRAFT/SNOW REG 186.00 110,WATERCRAFT A TITLE RE 159.00 720 3 MONTH SNOWBLOWER 3.008.00 5 BPC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 06/26/91 15:16:14 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 31603 06/21/91 HEARTLAND EXPRESS 31804 06/21/01 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE 31805 06/71/91 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE 31906 06/21/91 CLIMB. INC. 31807 06/21/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 31808 05/21/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 31809 OG/26/91 A.M. MAUS & SON 31010 08/28/91 AOOPT-A-PET 31811 06/?8/91 ANDERSON/SHIRLEV 31812 06/26/01 ANNANDALE VETERINARY 31812 09/26/91 ANNANDALE VETERINARY 31813 00/76/91 6APTON SANG & GRAVEL 31814 06/26/01 BOSE/TOM 31015 00/20/91 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 31616 00/20/01 FLICKERIS T.V. A ADP 31817 06/20/91 MALLIGER/JOANNE 31818 00/28/91 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC 31610 00/28/01 HOT IRON 31620 06/28/0,1 INTER CONF OF BLDG 0 31621 00/26/91 J M OIL COMPANY 31022 00/26/91 JOAN & DON OORAN 31023 00/26/91 LI6ePTY COMPUTER OUP 31023 08/76/91 LIBERTY COMPUTER &UP 31823 08/:0/91 LIBERTY COMPUTER SUP 31624 06/70/91 LUVACM/JOHN 31024 06/26/01 LUKACH/JOHN 31@24 06/20/91 LUVACH/JOHN Disbursement Jbuenal DESCRIPTION AMODUT CLAIM , Nr 549 AOVERTISIr1G/KMOM 50.00 221 C.O./INVESTMENTS 700.000.00 221 C.O.-tTrMjSTME71TS 350.000.00 .00IOS�RANT REQUEST FEES -) 857.00 118 WATERCRAFT REG & TITLE 03.00 118 WATERCRAFT/SNOW/REG 385.00 546 PARTS/BLD INSP VAN 96.00 4 ANIMAL CONTROL AOOPTI 440.00 13 MISC EXPENSE TO SEMINA 80.05 362 VET FEES/ANIIIAL CONTRO 80.00 362 MISC SUPPLIES/ANIMAL C 15.60 05.50 305 DUMP CHARGE/ASPHALT/ST 20.00 336 MILEAGE EXPENSE 28.13 20 MISC PROF SERV/AROP 3.050.00 60 REPAIRS/ANSWERING MACH 42.00 374 REPLACEMENT OF 2 TREE 000.00 85 OAS/FIRE DEPT 17.00 567 VAC ALL PARTS 24.60 201 MEMBERSHIP DUES/GARY A 75.00 05 OAS/FIRE DEPT 17.50 .00141 TREE REPLACEMENT A1.G@ 90 MISC OFFICE SUP/COMPUT 35.40 60 COMPUTER PAPER/DeP REG 34.00 00 COMPUTER PAPeR/DATA 0 102.00 �•�-•- 171.40 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 24.20 321 MILEAOE EXPENSE 24.30 327 MILEAGE EXPENie 26.30 'CHECK TOTAL -CHECK TOTA BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 06/26/91 15:14:14 i1 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM Ir1Vb1 31876 06/76/91 LUKACM/JOHN ,327 r4rLEAGE EXPENSE 77.99 • 1t.5.78 -CHECK TOFAL 31025 06/26/91 MAP.TIE'S FARM SERVIC 107 MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS OE 29.90 ' 31826 06/26/91 MAUS FOODS 108 TOWELS.ETC/SMOP 3 GAR 23.70 31829 06/29/91 r•AUS FOOOS 108 MISC SUPPLIES/CITY HALL 8.70 31826 05/26/91 MAUS FOODS 108 CLEANING SUP/ANIMAL CO 33.66 31826 06/26/91 MAUS FOODS 106 MISC SUPPLIES/LIBRAPV 22.52 88.58 -CHECK TOTAL ' 31927 06/20/91 MOBIL 131 GAS/BLDINSPECTIONS 17.76 31821 06/26/01 MOBIL 131 GAS/SEVER COLL 29.07 31827 06/20/91 MOS 1L 131 GAS/WATER DEPT 29.08 ' 31827 06/26/91 MOBIL 131 GAS/STREET DEPT 221.71 - 297.02 -CHECK TOTAL 31829 06/28/01 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 185 ADOPTIONS A ANIMAL CO 7 13.25 31829 06/20/91 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN 142 VEHIREPAIR PARTS/PARKS 52,50 31829 06/78/91 MOON MOTOR SALES, IN 142 OIL/PARK DEPT 1 1,14 31829 00/20/91 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN .142•EOUIP,REP PARTS/TREE F 39.75 ' 31820 08/26/01 MOON MOTOR SALES. Irl 142 OIL/SHADE TREE FUND 6.00 • 31629 06/20/91 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN. 142 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/PAR 12.91 " -_ • • ••• 1 17.10 -CHECK TOTAL , 1 31830 00/20/91 NATIONAL CHEMSEARCM 671 BUG SPRAY'ETC/PARKS 0 709.20 31631 06/26/91 NEWTON MANUFACTURING ,518 FIRE EMIT SIGNS/APART 2tA6.01 31832 00/20/91 P F H WAREHOUSE SALE 271 16ISC SUPPLIES%PARKS 1.505.74 I° 3193! 06/76/91 9UALITV LAWN MAINTEN 310 MOW1uG LOTS 405.00 I' 31936 00/76/91 PIVERSIOE OIL 600 GAS/STREET DEPT 787.95 31839 06/28/01 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTSC 227 TIME REPAIR/STREET DEPT 6.00 31935 00/20/91 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC 277 VEM REPAIRS/PARK DEPT 55.52 61.52 -CHECK TOTAL (. 31930 00/20/91 TURNOUIST PAPER COMP 206 PAPER TOWELS.ETC/C HA 101.60 31837 06/20/01 VIKING OFFICE SUPPLY 500 OFFICE SUP/BLD INSPEC 91.06 I 31038 00/70/91 WOLFSTELLER/RICHARD 217 MISC EXPENSE TO SEMIN 239.41 GEI+ERAL CHECKING - TOTAL 1.015.006.48 . A I BRC FltlANCIAL SYSTEM 07/12/91 12:51:15 Disbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENOOP DESCRIPTION AMOUNT -CLAIM IN " GENERAL CHECRING 31839 07/07/91 OAYUE VECHES .00162 SEWER/MATER REIMSURSEMT 1.74 ACCT 81- 31860 07/07/01 LUCILLE SANDBERG .90143 SEWER/WATER REIMSURSEMT 6.28 ACT BO' 31841 07/07/91 WARREN SMITH .90146 RECYCLING PRIZE 50.00 31842 07/07/91 LESLIE WILMOT .00145 RECYCLING PRIZE 75.00 31943 07/1)7/91 MiNN POLLUTION CONTR 127 PERMITS/BRIAR ESTATES 170.00 91-02 31844 07/07/91 MINT+ POLLUTION CONTR 127 PERMITS/FALLOf1 AVE 85.00 01-01 31866 07/07/91 t'll"J POLLUTION CONTR 127 PERMITS/CAROINAL HILLS 95.00 91-03 170.00 $CHECK TOTAL 31865 07/07/91 MINNESOTA OEPAP.TMEUT 235 PER14ITS/FALLOt+ AVE 50.00 91-1 31865 01/07/91 MINffESOTA DEPARTMENT 235 PERMITS/BRIAR ESTATES 50.00 91-2 31845 07/07/91 MINNESOTA OEPARTMEflT 235 PERMITS/CAP.DINAL HILLS 50.00 91-3 150.00 -CHECK TOTAL 31840 07/07/91 HAVES/WILMA 285 INFO CENTER SALARY 107.88 31846 07/07/01 HAVES/WILMA 285 INFO CENTER SALARY 55.90CR 112.50 -CHECK TOTAL 31947 07/07/01 ARNOLD/MARV 566 INFO CENTER SALARY 106.25 31847 07/07/91 ARNOLO/MARY 540 INFO CEfITER SALARY 35.000R 7'1.25 $CHECK TOTA- \ 91 31048 07/07/91 MONTICELLO DEPUTY RE 134 DEPUTY REGISTRAR FEES 640.00 31869 07/07/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 110 WATERCRAFT TITLES 73.00 91850 07/07/01 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAFT/SNOW REPOR 256.00 31851 07/07/01 HEARTLANO EXPRESS 569 AOVERTISItiG 50.00 31652 07/07/01 ANNANDALE CONTRACTIN,,. 421 UTILITY IMPROV/SAN 16.04').60 31653 07/10/91 AME REAOV MIX 8 SUPPLIES/PARK$ DEPT 166.00 31654 07./10/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA 7 TIF (VEIT1 BOND IN 12.062.50 31856 07/10/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA 7 TIF-(ELOERLYI BOND 11.330.00 31656 07/10/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 7 1069 GO BOND INTERE 7.361.25 _3t854 07/10/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA 7 1068 00 BONO IMTER 53.207.50 91056 07/10/.91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 7 WATER FUND BOND IN 36,476.25 ' 31856 07/10/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL 8A 1 SEWER 00 BOND 1tGTE 29.510.00 91654 01/10/01 AMEPICAN NATIONAL BA 7 1906 GO BOND INTER 11.610.00 31854 07/10/01 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 7 TIF(CONSTR 5)6ONO 10.696.25 31056 07/10/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL 8A 7 TIP(NAWCO)BONO INTE 5.665.00 31054 07/10/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL 6A 7 1000 00 BOND INTER 21.600.00 71054 07/10/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL 8A 7 TIF(XMART)SOND INT 17.170.00 BRC FIt7ANCIAL SYSTEM - 07/12/91 12:51:15 - D1sDursemsnt Journal WARRANT DATE vEN00R OESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM It1VOI1 GENERAL CHECKING 31854 07/10/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL PA 1 TIF(REM/TAPIBONO I 70.045.61 31854 07/10/01 AMERICAN NATIONAL PA 7 ME SANDB)BONO IN 12.225.18 248.219.54 •CHECK TOTAL 31855 07/10/91 ARA CORY REFRESHMEN T 406 MISC SUPPLIES/CITY MAL 40.00 31850 01/10/91 ARMA IIITERNATIONAL 528 MEMBERSHIP DUES 54.00 31857 07/10/01 ASTECH - 371 FINAL PYMT/SEAL COA 1.600.17 31858 07/10/91 SIFFS. INC. 395 LATRINE RENTAL 70.00 31850 07/10/01 BOSE/TOM 336 MILEAGE EXPENSE 49.50 31800 07/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 021.08 31860 07/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON, 24.PHONE CHARGES 93.16 31860 07/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 73.27 31860 07/10/01 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 40.01 31860 07/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE -CHARGES 80.41 31880 07/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 70.46 31800 07/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON - 24 PHONE CHARGES 20.00 31880 01/10/01 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON••.- 24 PHONE CHARGES 13.50 31800 07/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON. �,, 24 PHONE CHARGES 80.57 31860 07/10/01 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 20.00 31660 07/10/91 BPIOGEWATEP TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 36.28 , 31860 07/10/91 BRIOGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 38.92 31800 07/1,0/9/ BRIDGEWATER TELEPH 011 2A PHONE CHARGES 15.00 31860 07/10/91 3P.I0GEWATER TELEPH ON 24 PHONE CHARGES 17.27 31880 07/10/91 ORIOGSWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 20.60 1.251.10 *CHECK TOTAL 31801 07/10/91 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS. 25 STREET MATERIAL 483.50 i 31052 07/10/01 OUERR'S WATER CARE S 40 WATER CARE/WWTP RENTAL 35.10 31803 07/10/91 DYNAMIC SYSTEMS. INC 471 EQUIPMENT/WWTP 14.800.00 31864 07/10/01 FEEDRTTE CONTROLS. 1 56 CHEMICALS/WATER DEPT 792.55 31864 07/10/91 FEEORITE CONTROLS. I 50 tKISC PROF SERVICES/WA 119.00 .. _._ •71.55 •CHECK TOTAL 31005 07/10/91 FIRST TRUST CENTER 01 1984 00 BOND INTERS 3.500.00 31865 07/10/01 FIRST TRUST CENTER 51 TIG (FSI) BOND INTE 2.081.25 31005 07/10/91 FIRST TRUST CENTER 51 FIRE HALL BOND INT 20.775.00 318SS 07/10/01 FIRST TRUST CENTER 51 75 S/W BOND INTERES 2.550.00 31905 07/10/91 FIRST TRUST CENTER 01 70 /1W.PAYING AGENT F 185.91 35.002.13 •CHECK TOTAL BRC F7uIANCAI SVST EM 07/12/9, 2:51:15 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING ' 31606 07/10/91 FYLES EXCAVATING b H 31667 07/10/01 G E SUPPLY 31868 07/10/91 GARTNER'S OFFICE PRO 31869 07/10/01 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE 31869 07/10/91 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE 31869 07/10/91 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE 31869 07/10/91 GENERAL P.EffTAL CENTE 31870 07/10/91 HERMES/JERRY 31871 07/10/91 INnUSTRIAL MAINT. SU 31672 07/10/91 L "11" P SERVICES - L 31873 07/10/01 LARKIU.HOFFMAN.OALY 3107h 07/10/91 LUKACM/JOHN 31876 07/10/01 LUKACH/JOHN 31074 07/10/91 LUKACM/JOMN 31874 07/10/91 LUKACH/JOHN 31015 07/10/9, MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SU 31870 01/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY' 31076 07/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 31810 07/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 31970 07/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 31670 07/10/91 MIDWEST OAS COMPANY 31876 07/10/01 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 31670 07/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 31676 07/10/01 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 31011 07/10/01 MINNESOTA RURAL WATE 31078 07/10/91 MIIINESOTA STATE TREA 31070 01/10/01 NELSON/AL $ JULIO 31860 07/10/11 frOR1HWEST ASSOC CONS 31861 07/10/C1 NORWEST BANK MINNESO 31001 07/10/91 NORWEST BANK MINNESO 31001 01/10/01 NORWEST BANK MINNOW 316$1 07/10/91 NORWEST BANK MINNESO Disbursement Journel DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM I - _)1C 290 RELOCATE WATER HYDRAN 225.00 475 BATTERIES/RECYC SCANNE 46.08 377 OFFICE SUPPLIES/CITY 119.77 54 TRENCHER/SOD CUTTER/P 295.13 64 TRENCHEP./SHADE TREE 89.95 64 WIRE ETC/SMOP & GARAGE 65.92 64 DOLLY RENTAL/SHOP 8 GAR 0.95 457.05 61 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 727.50 51b NUTS A BOLTS/SHOP & G 1&5.58 103 FIRE HALL DOOR REPAIRS 35.00 497 LEGAL .SERVICES 1.352.38 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 20.13 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 20.13 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 20.16 327 MILEAGE EXPErrSE 60.40 120.00 116 AIRLESS GUN/SUPP/STRE 262.12 110 UTILITIES 13.17 115•UTILITIES 3.00 110 UTILITIES 4.99 115 UTILITIES 27.35 115 UTILITIEG 5.19 115 UTILITIES 6.19 115 UTILITIES 3.00 110'UTILITIES 6.10 72.06 128 MEMBERSHIP OUES/WATER 150.00 202 2110 OTR BLD PERMIT FE 1,03.09 th5 NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION 17.10 550 PROF $ERV/CHELSEA A 2.262.50 15h'761$&W $ONO INTERES 6.350.00 156 70 $$W PAYING AGENT F 200.00 15h 1060 GO $ONO INTEREST 925.00 156 1000 GO PAYING AGENT 200.00 -CHECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL VCHECK TOTAL BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/12/91 12:51:15 WARRANT OATC - VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 31881 07/10/91 NORWEST BANK MINNESO 31881 07/10/91 NORWEST BANK MINNESO 31881 07/10/91 NORWEST BANK MINNESO 31881 07/10/01 NORWEST BANK MINNESO 31881 07/10/91 NORWEST BANK MIPIN ESO 31881 07/10/01 NORWEST BANK MINHESO 31882 07/10/01 NORWEST IT+VESTMErrT S 31883 07/10/91 O.E.I. BUSINESS FORM 31884 07/10/91 OLSON. USSET.AGAH & 31864 07/10/91 OLSON. USSET.AGAN A 31884 07/10/91 OLSON. USSET.AGAU A 31884 07/10/91 OLSON. USSET.AGAN A 31885 07/10/91 POLKA OOT RECYCLING 31880 07/10/01 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 31887 07/10/91 THE BACK 0004 31880 07/10/91 TODD 8 CO.. INC./MIC 31883 07/10/91 TO00 L CO.. INC./NIC 31089 07/10/91 TRIIEMAN-WELTERS. INC 31800 07/10/01 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC 31890 07/10/91 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC 31800 07/10/01 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC 31990 07/10/01 UP) ITOO RENTAL SERVIC 31800 07/10/01 UHITOG RENTAL SERVIC 31090 07/10/91 UPI ITOO RENTAL SERVIC 31091 07/10/91 UNOCAL 31001 07/10/01 UNOCAL 31502 07/10/01 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA 31892 07/10/91 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA 31493 07/10/91 WATER PRODUCTS COMPA 31403 07/10/01 WATER PRODUCTS COMPA Olsbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOI= 154 LIBRARY 80140 INTERE 1.850.00 154 LIBRARY PAYING AGENT 200.00 154 1981 BOND INTEREST 3.000.00 154 1981 GO PAYING AGENT 200.00 154 1977 GO BOND INTER 24.887.50 154 1877 GO PAYING AGENT 200.00 37.712.50 155 COMPUTER PAYMEIIT 2.407.61 158 COPY MACHINE PAPER/C 117.15 292 PROF SERVICES/HRA 262.50 292 PROF SER/SANOBERG EAS 243.75 292 PROF SER/BRIAR OAKES 75.00 292 MISC PROF SERVICES 805.25 1.288.50 170 RECYCLING CONTRACT 1.769.97 175 WWTP COr1TRACT PAYM 28.687.50 90160 CHAIR/MUSEUM 42.00 303 SAFETY CANS/PARKS 143.50 303 RAIN SUITS/STREETS 163.50 307.00 207 VAC ALL PART 7.01 211 UNIFORM RENTAL 6.50 211 UNIFORM REIITAL 0.54 .211 UNIFORM RENTAL 12.00 211 UNIFORM RENTAL 12.40 211 UNIFORM RENTAL 52.50 211 UNIFOR14 RENTAL 52.51 143.77 213 OAS/MATER OEDT 11.06 ..213 GAS/SEWER COLL 11.06 22.00 024 JUNE GARBAGE CONTRA 0.034.62 524 SALES TAX/GARBAGE CON 447.00 0.510.70 210 METERS ETC 2.175.37 218 STANOPIPES/MISC SUP/W 210.24 2.396.01 VCHECK TOTAL -CHECK TOTAL "CHECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL "CHECK TOTAL -CHECK TOTAL -CHECK TOTAL 8P.0 Flaar.CIA_ SYSTEM 07/12/71 12:51:15 DlaDureement Journal WARRANT DATE VEHOOP, DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM GENERAL CHECKING 31896 07/10/91 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP 512 UTILITIES/STREET LITES 8.28 31805 07/10/01 YONAK LANDFILL. INC. 223 LANDFILL CHARGES 5.723.55 GENERAL CHECKING TOTAL 616.289.05 ORC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/13/01 17:28:08 - WARRANT DATE VEr10OR GENERAL CHECKING 31507 07/10/91 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 31507 07/16/01 OLSOH 6 SONS ELECTRI 31507 07/16/91 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 31507 07/16/91 OLSOH A SONS ELECTRI 31507 07/10/91 OLSON A SONS ELECTRI 31890 07/10/91 ALLIED BLACKTOP COMP 31997 07/16/91 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 31897 07/16/91 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 31698 07/10/91 U.S. POSTMASTER 31900 01/16/01 MONTICELLO COMMUNITY 31900 07/16/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 31900 07/16/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 31900 07/10/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 31900 07/10/91 rrORTHERN STATES POWE 31900 07/16/91 NOPIHERN STATES POWE 31000 07/16/01 NOPTHERN STATES POWE 31,900 07/16/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 31900 07/16/01 NORTNERH STATES POWE 31900 07/10191 r.ORTHER?J STATES POWE 31000 07/16/01 NORTHERN STATES POWE 31900 07/10/91 NORTHERN STATES POPE 31000 07/15/01 NORTHERN STATES DOVE 31001 07/10/01 HOGLUND COACH LINES 31902 07/10/91 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE 31503 07/10/01 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 31906 07/10/01 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 31005 01/10/01 MARCO BUSINESS PROOU 31905 01/10/91 MARCO BUSINESS PROOU 31500 07/10/91 PARTON SAND 6 GRAVEL 31006 07/16/01 SARTON SAND A GRAVEL 31007 07/16/01 RICHARD SIP►EL Disbursement Jour -nal OESCRIPTION AN0Ur4T CLAIM INVOI- 160 CK VOIOEO/REISSUEO 65.90CR 160 CK VOIDED/REISSUED 10.0OCR 100 CK VOIDEO/REISSUED 98A.7OCR 160 CK VOIDED/REISSUED 301. 50CR 160 CK VOIDEO/REISSUED 170.O00R 1.602. 16CR •CHECK TOTAL 552 80% SEALCOAT PAYME 36,236.93 105 TRAVEL EXPENSE, 30.00 105 ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRA 500.00 530.00 •CHECK TOTAL 210 POSTAGE CITY HALL 1.000.00 320 CITY SHARE/COMM ED 17.000.00 166 UTILTIES 3.310.95 166 UTILTIES 203. 71 160 UTILTIES 3.610. 27 166 UTILTIES 62. 76 166 UTILTIES 609. 43 166 UTILTIES 31. 30 166 UTILTIES 716. 15 160 UTILTIES 12.86 166 UTILTIES 737. EL 166 UTILTIES 205. AI 166 UTILTIES 576. 6e 160 UTILTIES 016. 82 0.950. 93 603 HEARTLAND EXPRESS C 6.316. 12 221 TIF TAPPER PAYMENT 15.500. 00 110 WATERCRAFT TITLES 60.00 110 SNOWMDBILE/WATER/ATV 532.00 106 COPY MACHINE MTC AG 2.785. 00 100 COPY MCH SUPPLIES 675.30 3.860. 30 300 SIDEWALK PROJ COSTS 12.00 305 MISC DUMPING/PARKS OEP 90.71 130. 70 .00163 REIM11/20 DAY SELLING 200.00 •CHECK TOTAL •CNECX TOTAL •CHECK TOTAL BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/13/91 12:28:08 WARRANT PATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 31908 07/16/91 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF 31909 07/16/01 FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER 31910 07/16/91 HATCH -PETERSON SALES 31911 07/16/91 OLSON b, SONS ELECTRI 31912 07/27/91 A T & T INFO SYSTEMS 31013 07/2?/91 ADAM'S PEST CONTQOL 31914 07/22/91 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 31915 07/22/91 BARCO PRODUCTS. INC. 31915 07/22/91 SARCO PRODUCTS. INC. 31818 07/22/91 SEN FRANKLIN 31916 07/22/01 BEN FRANKLIN 31916 07/22/91 SEN FRANKLIN 3191? 07/22/91 COAST TO COAST 31017 07/22/91 COAST TO COAST 31917 01/77/91 COAST TO COAST 31917 07/22/91 COAST TO COAST 31911 07/22/91 COAST TO COAST 31917 07/22/91 COAST TO COAST 31917 07/22/91 COAST TO COAST 31017 07/22/91 COAST TO COAST 31917 07/22/91 COAST TO COAST 31917 07/22/01 COAST TO COAST 31911 07/22/91 COAST TO COAST 31017 07/22/01 COAST TO COAST 31211 01/?2/91 COAST TO COAST 31917 07/22/01 COAST TO COAST 31014 01/22/01 COMMUNICATION AUDITO 31919 07/22/91 COMPUTER -AID. INC. 31020 07/22/91 COPY OUPLCATING PROD 31921 07/22/01 OYNA SYSTEMS 31922 07/22/91 FLICKER'$ T.V. 6 APP Oisbursement Journal yy DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM ,qrr 174 INSURANCE PREMIUM 40.08 55 TREE REPLACEMENTS 1.705.42 94 SOFTBALL FIELD$ SUPPL 184.47 160 ELECTRONIC CONtt/SEW 1.378.00 15 FIRE PHONE CHARGES 4.40 3 LIBRARY PEST CONTROL 4&.00 17 RAIOO REPAIRS/6LO INSP 55.70 736 MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS 323.55 230 MISC SUPPLIES/SEWER C 371.75 805.30 20 DELIVERY MAIL/COMPUTER 9.89 20 MISE SVP/INSPECTIONS 11.40 20 VAC ALL PARTS 15.12 42.61 35 MISC SUPPLIES/SHOP 8 OA 3.39 ,35 CLD REPAIR SUP/CITY MAL 7.06 35 WEN REPAIR PARTS/STREET 1.75 35 TOOLS/SEWER COLL 23.0E 35 MISC SUPPLIES/FIRE CEP 37.62 35 GLOVES. ETC/PARRS DEPT 10.14 35 SUPPLIES/ANIMAL CONTRO 59.66 35 CLO SUP/ANIMAL CONTROL 60.27 35 MISC SUPPLIES/VATER Of 34.96 35 SLD REPAIR SUP/PARKS 15.80 35 EOUIP REPAIR PARTS/PARK 6.36 33 MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS OE 31.50 35 MI2C SUPPLIES/INSPECTIO 6.34 35 SHOP MATERIAL/VATER DE 20.55 301.80 36 PAGER REPATRS/FIRE DEP 73.62 615 PROF SERVICES/COMPUTE 135.00 Al COPY MACHINE MTC/LISRA 45.00 60 MIBC SMOP 8 OAR SVPPL 1311.71 60 ANSWERING PHONE MANUAL 1.00 -CMECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL CHECK TOTA i BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/13/01 12:2e:08 WARPANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKIr1G 31923 01/2?/91 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE, 31923 07/22/01 FPOrITLINE PLUS FIRE 31973 07/22/91 FP01ITLINE PLUS FIRE 31924 07/22/91 GOPHER STATE ONE CAL 31925 07/22/91 GRUYS. JOHNSON A ASS 31925 07/22/91 GP.VYS. JOHNSON A ASS 31926 07/22/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 31926 07/22/01 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 31926 07/27/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 31020 07/22/0, HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 31920 07/22/91 HARRV'S AUTO SUPPLY 31026 01/22/01 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 31970 07/22/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 31927 07/77/91 HERMES/JERRY' 31026 01/22/01 IDEAL RADIATOR REPAI 31929 07/22/91 K MART STORE 31030 07/72/91 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA 31931 01/22/91 MACDUEEN EQUIPMENT I 31932 07/27/01 MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC 31933 07/22/91 HAUS FOODS 31033 07/22/01 MAUS FOODS 31933 07/22/91 MAUS FOODS 31033 07/72/01 MAUS 0:0008 31933 01/27/91 MAUS FOODS , 31033 07/22/01 MAUS FOODS 31934 07/22/01 MONTICELLO OFFICE DR 31934 07/27/91 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 31034 01/21/01 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 31934 07/27/91 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 31934 07/72/01 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 31935 01/22/97 MONTICELLO PRINTING Olsoursement Journal OESCRIPTION AM.)UNT CLAIM INVOI' $10 COATS/PANTS/FIRE DEPT 000.00 510 FLASHLIGHTS ETC/FIRE 76.00 510 TOOLS/FIRE DEPT 15.50 601.50 69 RISC PROF SER/WATER 95.00 74 1090 FINANCIAL AUD 11.800.00 74 RISC AUDIT FEES 150.00 11.050.00 78 VEHICLE REPAIRS/STREET 53.14 78 VEHICLE PARTS/PARKS 2.45 70 EOUP REPAIR PARTS/STRE 71.75 78 TOOLS/SHOP A GAR 5.05 78 MISC SUP/SHOP 8 GAR 26.79 78 VAC ALL PARTS 76.05 78 VEHICLE REPAIRS/SEWER 10.00 248.73 81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50 854 VAC .RADIATOR REPAIRS 60.00 400 VEHICLE 14TC SUP/WATER 29.07 08 MEMBERSHIP DUES 288.00 104 YAC ALL PARTS 191.41 107 MISC SUP/STREETS 14.50 108 CLEAN SUP/ANIMAL CONTRO 9.73 108 MISC SUPPLIES/LIBRARY 8.05 108 CLEA17 SUP/LIBRARY 34.98 108 PLAW & SON SUPPLIES 03.02 108 MISC SUP/CITY MALL 10.38 108 MISC SUP/STREETS 15.31 178.37 138 OFFICE SUPPLIES/PARKS 1.50 130 OFFICE SUP/WATER DEPT 8.00 138 MISC SUP/INSPECTIONS 27.07 130 OFFICE SUP/PLAN 8 1014 3.00 138 OFFICE SUP/CITY HALL $27.07 004.00 137 FINANCE FORMS/CITY HAL 78.80 'CHECK TOTAL -CHECK TOTAL 'CHECK TOTAL •CNECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL BRC FINANCIAL SYSTE14 07/13/91 12:26:08 %IARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 31936 07/22/91 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN 31036 07/22/91 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN 31930 07/22/91 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN 31937 07/22/91 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 31037 07/22/01 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 31937 07/22/91 NATIOr+AL BUSHING PAR 31037 07/22/01 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 31937 07/22/91 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 31938 07/?2/91 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS 31730 07/22/91 OL SON 6 SONS ELECTRI 31939 07/22/91 OLSON A SONS ELECTRI 31939 07/22/01 OLSOH 6 SONS ELECTRI 31939 07/22/91 OLSON 6 SONS ELECTRI 31030 07/22/01 OLSOrt A SONS ELECTRI 31939 07/22/91 OL SON \ SONS ELECTRI 31039 07/27/01 OLSON 6 SONS ELECTRI 31939 07/22/91 OLSON S SONS ELECTRI 31840 07/22/91 OLSON. USSET.AOAN l 31040'07/22/91 OLSON. USSET.AGAN 6. 31940 07/22/91 OLSON. USSET.AGAN 6 31940 07/22/01 OLSON. USSET,AGAN a 31941 07/22/01 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 31941 07/22/91 ORR-SCMELEII-MAYERON 31941 07/22/01 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 31941 07/22/91 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 31941 07/22/01 ORP-SCHELEN-MAYERON 31941 07/27/91 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 31041 07/22/01 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 31941 07/22/91 OPR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 31942 07/27/91 PACE. INCORPORATED 31043 07/22/01 PLEASURE PRODUCTS 31944 07/72/91 P1.lIr'$fRv-PURCELL15 P 31044 07/22/01 OLUMSERY-PURCELL'S P 31944 07/22/91 PLUrt6ERY-OURCELL'S P Disbursement Journal "1 OESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM I.. AGI 142 EQUIP REPAIRS/DARKS 137.97 ' 142 EOUP REPAIRS/SHADE TRE 25.30 142 VEHICLE REPAIRS/PARKS 12.70 175.07 *CHECK TOTAL 144 VAC ALL REPAIRS 795.76 144 CORRECT COOING FRM JU 500.26CR 144 VEHICLE REPAIRS/FIRE 0 45.01 144 TOOLS/SHOP A: GAR 4.74 144 CORRECT BILL FROM JUNE 40.000R ' 109.67 •CHECK TOTAL 550 LEGAL FEES/PLAN 6 2 1.516.50 180 BLD REPAIR SUP/PARKS 57.11 160 SLO REPAIRS/FIRE DEPT 10.09 160 REPAIRS/STREET LIGHTI 984.76 1GO SEN CITIZEN SLO REPAIR 40.00 160 MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS 28.64 160 COMPUTER CABLE REPAIRS 44.42 160 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/VAT 30.00 100 WELL REPAIRS/WATER 95.36 . 1.208.37 *CHECK TOTAL 292 LEGAL FEES 577.50 292 LEGAL FEES/HRA 131.25 1 _ 292 LEGAL FEES/6RIAR OAKE 712.50 J 202 LEGAL FEES/AROPLA% ORO 93.75 1.515.00 *CHECK TOTAL 182 MISC ENGINEERING FE 2.213.40 162 ENO FEE$/6RIAR DARES 027.75 162 ENO FEES/FALLON AVE 59.75 162 ENO FEES/PLAN & ZON 3.402.50 182 ENO FEES/REMNELE PROJ 59.75 182 ENO FEES/CARDINAL H 2.200.00 1162 ENO FEES/TTF TAPPER 60.75 162 ENO FEE!/WATER RESE 2.430.00 11.093.07 *CHECK TOTAL 360 BACTERIA ANALYSIS/WAT 346.00 .00023 REPAIRS/PARTS/FIRE 2.457.71 251 SLO REPAIR SUP/SHOP &G 27.95 251 SLD REPAIR SUP/CITY MAL 2.59 251 MISC SUPPLIES/WATER 7.25 37.70 9CMECK TOTAL _ BRCFINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/13/91 12:28:08 Disbursement Journal ` J .."RANT DATE VENOOR ,1 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOI GENERAL CHECKING 31945 01/?2/91 PPEUSSE'S CLEANING S 173 FIRE HALL CLEANING CON 50.00 31045 07/22/91 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S 173 CITY HALL CLEANING CO 400.00 - 450.00 -CHECK TOTAL 31948 07/22/01 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC 227 TIRE REPAIR/PARKS DEPT 8.00 • 31940 07/22/91 POYAL TIRE OF MONTIC 227 EQUIP REPAIRS/STREETS 232.20 31048 07/22/91 ROvAI TIRE OF MONTIC 227 VEHICLE REP/STREETS 130.25 • 388.45 1CHECK TOTAL 31047 07/22/01 SCHAPBER A SONS, INC 229 BALANCE ON SNOWSLO 14.451'.00 tt 31948 07/22/91 SHARE CORPORATION 281 OEOROORI2ER5/PARKS OE 231.09 I 31040 07/22/01 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 193 VAC ALL REPAIRS 05.80 31949 07/22/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 193 MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS OEP 9.50 31949 01/22/01 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 103 MISC•BLD REPAIRS/FIRE 14.67 , • 118.97 -CHECK TOTAL 31050 07/22/01 ST. CLOUD TECHNICAL '553 TRAINING/FIRE DEPT 230.00 31951 07/27/91 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO 219 JULY SHERIFFS CONT 14.336.95 31051 07/22/01 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 210 TIF CERTIFICATION $0.00 ._ 14.388.95 •CHECK TOTAL ' 31057 07/22/01 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPO 224 JULY YMCA CONTRACT PV 815.00 j GENERAL CHECKING TOTAL 154.441.92 7 BRC 9111A1JCIAL SY$TFM 07/01/01 08:44:49 017Dur9lmunt Journal ( WARRANT OATE VENDOR OESCRIDTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE LIQUOR FUND 157&3 06/28/91 COMMISSIONER OF REVE 800006 1/2 OF JUNE SALES T 5.518.50 151:6 08/28/9; QUALITY WINE 5 SDIRI 800040 MISC MI% PURCHASE 15)66 08/28/91 OVALIry WINE 5 SDIRI 800040 WINE PURCHASE 74&,65 15744 08/28/01 QUALITY VINE ! SDIRI 800040 LIQUOR PURCHASE 2.226.46 2.980.64 -CHECK TOTAL 15765 06/28/91 U S VEST COMMUNICATI 800003 ADVERTISING 21.80 15746 00/28/91 COAST TO COAST 800004 MISC SUPPLIES 14.34 18747 08/28/01 PH iLLIP4 ! SONS CO/E 800037 WINE PURCHASE 859.72 15)41 06/20/91 PNILL IDS 8 SONS CO/ E 800037 LIQUOR PURCHASE 2.093.69 • 2,753.37 •CHECK TOTAL 157:8 06/28/91 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 WI1JE PURCHASE 700.03 15740 05/28/91 GRIGGS. COOPER A COM 8000;8 �LIOUOR PURCHASE 2.887.35 15750 06/28/01 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800017 WINE PURCHASE 502.15 ;575; 08/28/9; PHILLIPS A SONS CO/E 800037 WINE PURCHASE 1.267.25 ;575; OG/20/81 PHILLIPS 8 SONS CO/ E 800037 ,LI0UOR PURCM&SE 010.91 - 15751 06/28/01 PHILLIPS A SONS CO/E 800037 MISC MI%'PURCMASE 20.51 •1.000.57 -CHECK TOTAL 5fa2 94/99/91 011pFeN nc n n 1♦ L. a 1 eeooe_ n..n LI...s F .:5 sTc:x 1.e32.52 19757 00/28/91 BUREAU OF.ALCOHOL/TO 600002 VINE FLOOR STOCK TA 1.686.04 �+1 15752 00/28/01 BUREAU OF ALCIOHOL/TO 800082- BEER, FLOOR STOCK TA 2.108.88 , 5.443.82 -CHECK TOTAL 15)53 08/78/01 OVALITV WIN: A SDIRI 800040 LIQUOR PURCNASE 920.01 15153 08/78/91 OUALI TV WINE 5 BPIRI 8000&0 VINE�DURCHABE - 909.62 .1 1.420.bo *CHECK TOTAL 15754 00/20/91 AMEPICAN BUSINESS F 800073 CLOTHING SUPPLIES/VES O94.20 IS755 O:/78/0: JOHNSON OROS WMOLESA 800072 LIQUOR PURCHASE 2.413.82 15755 00/25/91 40Wn5^N 5003 WHOLESA 000022 WINE PURCHASE 1.006.61 ' b.000.23 •CHECK TOTAL 15760 00/70+91 MINN AMATEUR BASEBAL 800107 ADVERTISTN0 41.56 ;5757 05/18)0+ DM ILLIPS ! SONS CO/E 800031 + LIQUOR PURCHASE 2.358.75 15797 08/29/91 PM ILLIPS 8 SONS CO/E 800037 VINE PURCM ASE 79.07 2.646.85 -CHECK TOTAL 15750 00/78/91 GP,IOGS. COOPER S COM 800010 LIQUOR PURCHASE 7.000.61 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/01/91 06:44:40 Disbursement Jour") WARRANT DATE VENOOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE LIQUOR FUND 15759 06/79/91 EAGLE WINE COMPANr 600012 VINE PURHCASE 36.03 15750 08/28/01 EArLE WINE COM PAll, 600012 MISC SUPPLIES CREDIT 1.59CR 35.04 .CHECK TOTAL 15760 06/26/91 OVAL ITr WINE 6 SPIRIT 800040 LIQUOR PURCHASE 854.19 15700 04/20/91 QUALI Tr WINE 1 SDIPj '900040 WINE PU RHCASE 709.07 :6760 06/26/01 QUALITY VINE S SPIRI 600040 MISC MIK PURCHASE 66.21 1.431.42 -CHECK TOTAL 1575: 06/26/91 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 600022 LIQUOR PURCHASE 2.726.21 15701 00/26/91 JOHNSON OROS WHOLESA 600022 WINE PURCHASE 1.071.89 3.299.98 -CHECK TOTAL LIQUOR FUND TOTAL 44.154.16 0 C/ BRCFINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/00/91 09:17:S5 D1sDursem4nt Journal WARRANT OATE VENOOP - DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE LIQUOR FW+O 15762 07/10/91 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 000022 WINE PURCHASE 481.74 JULY BILL 1S763 07/10/91 PHILLIPS 8 SONS CONE 800037 WINE PURCHASE 963.02 JULY BILL 15764 07/10/81 BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA 800001 POP PURCHASE 431.00 JUNE BILL 15765 07/10/01 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 800002 TELEPHONE CHARGES 92.01 JUNE BILL 15760 07/10/91 COAST TO COAST 800004 FILTERS.SULBS.ETC 21.78 JUNE BILL 15768 07/10/01 COAST TO COAST 800004 CHORE GLOVES 10.40 JUNE BILL ' 32.26 -CHECK TOTAL 15767 07/10/01 COMMISSIONER OF REVE 000006 SALES TAX DUE JUNE 6.232.10 JUNE BILL 15706 07/10/91 DAMLHEIMER DISTRIBUT 000009 BEER PURCHASE 20.090.40 JUNE BILL 15768 07/10/91 DAMLHEIMER DISTRIBUT 800000 JUICE PURCHASE 49.35 'JUNE BILL • _ 26.139.78 -CHECK TOTAL 15760 07/10/81 DAY DISTRIBUTING COM 800010 BEER PURCHASE 509.00 JUNE BILI 15770 07/10/91 OICK WHOLESALE CO.. 000011 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 54.50 JUNE BILI 15770 07/10/91 DICK WHOLESALE CO.. 600011 BEER PURCHASE 1.875.40 JUNE BILI 15770 07/10/91 DICK WHOLESALE CO.. 000011 CUPS. FOR,RESALE 370.00 JUNE BILI .' 2.040.00 -CHECK TOTAL 15771 07/10/91 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE 1 600010 BEER PURCHASE 10.900.80 JUNE BILL 15771 07/10/91 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I 800010 JUICE PURCHASE 11.00 JUNE BILL 15771 07/10/91 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I 000019 MISC SUPPLIES 20.75 JUNE BILI 15771 07/10/01 GROSSLEiN BEVERAGE 1 800010 MUGS FRO RESALE 82.80 JUNE BILL . ' 17.010.20 -CHECK TOTAL 15772 07/10/01 JUDE CANDY 8 TOBACCO e00021 CIGARS AND GIGS 210.13 JUNE BILL 15772 07/10/91 JUDE CANDY S TOBACCO 800021 BAGS. ETC/SUPPLIES 237.53 JUNE SILL 15772 01/10/01 JUDE CANDY & TOBACCO 800021 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 64.00 JUNE BILL 512.46 *CHECK TOTAL 15773 01/10/01 MAUS FOODS 000027 MISC SUPPLIES 11.24 JUNE BILI 15774 07/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 600020 UTILITIES 0.59 JUNE BILL 15775 07/10/01 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 500031 OFFICE SUPPLIES 15.12 JUNE BILL 15770 07/10/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 000012 ADVERT ISTNG ,BELTS 100.95 JUNE BILI 15777 01/10/01 MONTICELLO VACUUM CE 000050 VACUUM 11.SS JUNE BILL 15778 07/10/11 NORTMERN STATES POWE 000035 UTILITIES " 989.20 JUNE BILL " 1 � 1 _ 1 n BRCFINANCIAL SYSTEN 07/00/91 00:17:55 0isbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT . LIQUOR .FUND ' 15779 07/10/91 O'HARA BROS. COMPANI 800058 MISC MERCHANDISE/RESA 215.00 15780 07/10/01 RON'S ICE COMPANY 000041 ICE FOR RESALE 063.22 15781 07/10/91 SERVICE SALES'CORPOR 800042 MISC SUPPLIES 107.01 15782 07/10/51 SEVEN-UP BOTTLING CO 800043 POP FOR RESALE 183.45 15763 07/10/91 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 900045 CUPS AND MIKES/RESALE 175.35 15793 07/10/91 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 800045 JUICES FOR RESALE 2.2.75 15784 07/10/91 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 BEER PURCHASE 21.068.05 15785 07/10/91 VIKING COCA-COLA BOT 600051 POP PURCHASE 279.75 LIQUOR FUND TOTAL 81,812.37 CLAIM INVOI;" JUNE BILL JUNE BILL JUNE BILL JUNE BILL JUNE BILL JUNE BILL -CHECK TOTAL JUNE BILL JUNE BILL 1� J •7'� r � i .0 CLAIM INVOI;" JUNE BILL JUNE BILL JUNE BILL JUNE BILL JUNE BILL JUNE BILL -CHECK TOTAL JUNE BILL JUNE BILL 1� J