The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 08-26-1991AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Monday, August 26, 1991 - 7:00 p.m. Mayor: Ken Maus Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Call to order. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held August 12, 1991. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. Consideration of resolution authorizing and awarding the sale of $515,000 G.O. improvement bonds, Series 1991A, for the Fallon Avenue, Cardinal Hills, and Briar Oakes Estate Improvement projects. Consideration of resolution adopting a proposed preliminary 1992 budget and setting a proposed tax levy. Consideration of a request by a group of citizens to adopt East Bridge Park. Request includes development of an arboretum. Consideration of contracting with the League of Minnesota Cities personnel project to achieve compliance with pay equity requirements. Consideration of proposals for demolition or removal of the O.G. Bland house for City Hall parking lot expansion project. Consideration of design and cost estimates along with the City being the general contractor for remodeling of the Information/Chamber building. Update on City Hall parking lot expansion. Consideration of setting average quarterly winter sewer use for residential customers who do not use metered city water. Consideration of a resolution to enter into an agreement with Wright County for construction of a traffic signal at the intorsoction of CSAH 75, CSAH 39, and CH 118. Bills. Adjournment. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, August 12, 1991 - 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Ken Maus, Dan Blonigen, Clint Herbst Members Absent: None 2. Approval of minutes. Dan Blonigen requested that the vote on item #9 be changed to reflect a 4 to 1 vote with Blonigen voting against the motion. There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Shirley Anderson to approve the meeting minutes with the changes as noted. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. None forthcoming. 4. Consideration of a conditional use request to allow retail/ commercial activities as listed in Chapter 12, Section 2, B-2,_ (limited business district) of this ordinance in 9 P7.M (Performance zone mixed). Applicant, 21st Century Builders. Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that the Planning Commission has recommended that the conditional use permit be approved with a number of conditions. O'Neill noted that the original conditional use request issued to 21st Century Builders in May of 1990 had lapsed, and there are some substantial changes to the original site plan; therefore, the developer needs to obtain a new conditional use permit before proceeding on dovelopment of the structure. After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and soconded by Dan Blonigon to approve the conditional use permit request subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of final landscaping and berming plan creating effective transition botween commercial and residential properties must be roviowed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a building permit. A bond in the amount of 1009 of the cost to install landscaping shall be provided to the City prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Development of a retaining wall shall be accompanied by installation of a safoty fence for f tho purpose of eliminating access to the odgo of Pago 1 Council Minutes - 8/12/91 the retaining wall. The fence shall be made of weather -resistant material and be at least 6 feet high. Prior to issuance of a building permit, drainage and retaining wall construction plans shall be approved by the City Engineer. 4. The parking requirements are based on retail use of the structure only. Restaurant use is allowed only with an amendment to the conditional use permit. 5. Grading and landscaping plan are to show a sidewalk located 1 foot off the property line and located on City right-of-way. All code requirements relating to fire department access to the rear of the structure shall be met. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Consideration of reRairinq, refurbishing, rentinq, or demolishinq the Cole house near City Hall. John 5imola informed Council that staff has prepared specifications for repairs to the Cole house and obtained prices from local contractors to do the work. Input from contractors indicates that the cost to have the home completely refurbished per our specifications, including staff time, would cost $18,000 to $19,000. As a second alternative, the City could have as much work as possible done by various local contractors to get the home at least in code compliance, probably using some City employees for portions of the work. The estimated cost of this option would be about $5,000 to $8,000. The City could then rent the home to someone who would complete the painting and other repairs and probably give them about six months' free rent valued at another $3,000. The third alternative would be to have the house demolished or removed at an estimated cost of $4,000 to $9,000. Ken Maus suggested that staff research the possibility of selling the property with the option of buying back tho property in the event the City needs it for future expansion. Under this alternative, the house would remain on the tax rolls. Maus noted that the City will not actually need the property for another six to ten years, and he hates to see the structure torn down at this time. He went on to request that staff contact the City Attorney to see what sort of agreement Page 2 Council Minutes - 8/12/91 could be structured with a potential home buyer that would allow the City to buy back the property at a reasonable price in the future. Dan Blonigen suggested that plans for refurbishment be put on hold and agreed that staff should look into the buy-back option. After discussion, a motion was made by Dan Blonigen and seconded by Brad Fyle to prepare the structure for cold storage and table consideration of demolishing the Cole house. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Consideration of final payment to Dynamic Systems for control system at the wastewater treatment plant and consideration of replacement of selected field sensors at the wastewater treatment plant. John Simola reported that Dynamic Systems has completed the control panel at the wastewater treatment plant. The main control panel and the backup system operation at the wastewater treatment plant have been verified by PSG and Dean Sharp from OSM. The expediency of the project and the quality of the work from Dynamic Systems was exceptional. The proposed price from uynamic Systems for installation of the control system was $79,500. There were no additional costs from Dynamic Systems to the City during construction of the control panel. Consequently, the project cost is $79,500. we have paid Dynamic Systems a total of $74,531, leaving a balance or final payment due of $4,969. Simola went on to inform Council that during installation of the control panel, all of the field sensors wore chocked out. Some of the field sensors were found not to be within tolerance for calibration, unreliable, or had parts missing due to City employees using them to make other sensors operational due to unavailability of parts. Simola noted that two sensors or meters for the wastewater treatment plant from Dynamic Systems are needed to replace those that are not working at a cost of $4,680. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan Blonigen to make final payment to Dynamic Systems for the control panel in the amount of $4,969 and authorize the purchase of the two flow motors from Dynamic Systems at a cost of 14,680. Motion carried unanimously. 7. Consideration of replacement of south primary clarifier chain and sprocket assemblies at the wastewater treatment plant. John Simola reported that during the 1991 budget process it was noted that the south primary clarifier chains and sprockets at the wastewater treatment plant were in need of Page 3 Council Minutes - 8/12/91 repair or replacement. It was determined at that time to get through the winter by doing repairs or small segment replacements to the chain so the actual replacement could be done in the 1991 operating budget. As an alternative to replacing the clarifier chains at this time, the City could continue to replace bits and pieces as needed In the clarifier chains and sprockets. This appears to be the most costly alternative in the long run; and because of limited manufacturers of the chain, it may become more difficult in the future to get the parts as needed. After discussion, a motion was made by Dan Blonigen and seconded by Shirley Anderson to authorize replacement of the clarifier chains and sprockets for the south primary clarifier as outlined at an estimated cost of $5,000. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of final payment to DNCON, Inc., for Sidewalk Improvement Prosect 91SW-1 and consideration of settinq assessment hearinq on said improvement proiect. John Simola reported that DNCON, Inc., of Lakeville has completed the sidewalk installation as of July 20. The restoration work was recently completed, dnd the final payr.cnt quantities have been determined. The original bid on the project, based on the estimated quantities, was $30,077. This included not only installation of the new sidewalk but repairs to the existing sidewalk system. The final quantities extended to a total project cost of $32,526. The primary reasons for the overrun were due to the additional curb and sod over estimated quantities and the replacement of additional sidewalk in front of the Lindquist Funeral Home at the request of the property owner. This additional cost of $1,250 plus inspection costs will be assessed 1008 to the property owner, as this particular sidewalk was on the grid; but based on our criteria, the sidewalk did not need replacement. Dan Blonigon noted that some property owners are placing decorative rock or other obstructions in the city boulevard areas. He noted that solid obstructions on boulevard areas can create safety hazards. John Simola concurred that there are numerous sites whore solid obstructions have been placed on the city boulevard. Ho noted that he would list those items and bring them back onto the agenda for further Council review. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Andorson and seconded by Clint Herbst to approve final payment to DNCON in Page 4 Council Minutes - 8/12/91 the amount of $4,694 for Sidewalk Improvement Project 91SW-1 and set a date of September 9, 1991, to hold the assessment hearing for the project. Motion carried unanimously. 9. Consideration of reviewing and amendino the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund Guidelines. Economic Development Director, 011ie Koropchak, reported that the City Attorney, Paul Weingarden, requests that the Economic Development Authority and City Council make an amendment to the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund Guidelines. It was Weingarden's concern that the fund guidelines as now written appear to discriminate against new businesses that would locate in Monticello that might be in competition with existing businesses. After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Shirley Anderson to approve the amendment to the GMEF Guidelines' definition of public purpose, paragraph 3, as suggested by Attorney Paul Weingarden and amended by the Economic Development Authority. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Consideration of approving transfer of on -sale liguor license --Silver Fox Motel. Rick Wolfsteller reported that Rod Dragsten, owner of the Silver Fox Motel, has been issued an on -sale liquor license for the period July 1, 1991, through June 30, 1992. Dragsten is in the process of transferring ownership of the motel to Lydia Wang. The corporation's new name will be Chin Yuen Silver Fox Inc. It will operated by Ms. Wang, her daughter, and son-in-law. Ms. Wang has applied for transfer of the liquor license, which is a requirement of our city ordinance. In addition, the Liquor Control Division must approve the transfer. Wright County Sheriff's Department is doing a background check on the new owners, but we are not aware of any information that would adversely affect the license transfer. The new owner of the Silver Fox Motel has operated for approximately five years in the Chin Yuen Restaurant on Highway 10 in Elk River. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Dragaton has indicated that the transfer of ownership may not occur immediately, and Dragsten requests that Council approve the transfer in anticipation of completion of the sale in 90 days. After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fylo and seconded by Dan Blonigon to approve the liquor license transfer from Rodney Dragsten to Lydia Wang contingent upon Liquor Control Division approval with said approval on liquor license transfer to expire in 90 days. Motion carried unanimously. Page 5 Council Minutes - 8/12/91 11. Consideration of adopting 1992 Monticello Heartland Express Manaqement Plan and adoptincq resolution entering into contract with State of Minnesota Department of Transportation to provide public transportation. Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that the Monticello Transportation Advisory Committee has reviewed the proposed budget and management plan and recommends that Council adopt the plan and associated resolution. The plan proposes no changes to the existing level of service, and the budget proposes a total operating expense of $72,182, which is $600 less than the 1991 budget total. O'Neill went on to remind Council that the state will finance 608 on the $72,182 annual operating budget, or $43,309. It is projected that the City will obtain $11,184 in fare revenue. The remaining $17,689 must be financed through general tax revenue. O'Neill also noted that according to the project supervisor, Tom Gottfried of MN/DOT, the Monticello system shows good growth patterns, and the cost per ride is well below MN/DOT guidelines. Hoglund Coach Lines continues to provide excellent service and is in compliance with the terms of the two-year contract which expires in December of 1992. O'Neill noted that it is the general goal of most systems to have the fare revenue pay 201 of the cost to operate the system. Although the Monticello Heartland Express fare revenue has been increasing, it finances 168 of the cost to operate the system. Council reviewed the management plan and requested that the Monticello Transportation Advisory Committee continue to evaluate the existing fare requirement and possibly consider a small increase in order to achieve the goal of having the fare revenue pay 208 of the cost to operate the system. After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Dan Blonigen to adopt the 1992 Monticello Heartland Express Management Plan and adopt a resolution entering a contract with the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation to provide public transportation. Motion carried unanimously. 12. Consideration of ratifying settlement of litigation issue -- Senior Citizen Center. Rick wolfstoller requested that Council table the matter until a special mooting which could be conducted sometime later in the week. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan Blonigon to table consideration of ratifying settlement of litigation issue for Senior Citizen Center. Motion carried unanimously. Page 6 Council Minutes - 8/12/41 13. Other matters. Rick Wolfsteller informed Council that the hospital district has requested that the City Engineer prepare the plans and specifications for development of an expanded parking facility. Wolfateller requested that Council consider allowing the City Engineer to work for the hospital district. It was the consensus of Council that the City Engineer shoula be allowed to prepare the plans and specifications for development of the parking facility with the hospital district financing the associated expenses. John Simola reported that the cost estimates for development for the refurbishment of the information center and development of an office for the Chamber of Commerce will be provided at the next meeting. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Ken Maus expressed words of appreciation to John Badalich, who is retiring after 16 years of service to the City of Monticello. Badalich thanked the Mayor and City Council for their support through the years and noted that through their foresight, the City is equipped to handle city growth for years to Como. Jeff O'Neill Assistant Administrator Pago 7 Council Agenda - 8/26/91 4. Consideration of resolution authorizinq and awarding the sale of 3515,000 G.O. improvement bonds, Series 1991A, for the Fallon Avenue, Cardinal Hills, and Briar Oakes Estate improvement projects. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At noon Monday, August 26, Springsted, Inc., our bond consultant, will be receiving bids on the sale of $515,000 G.O. improvement bonds. The proceeds of this sale will be used to finance the Cardinal Hills, Fallon Avenue, and Briar Oakes Estate improvement projects which are currently under way. A representative of Springsted, Inc., will provide the Council with a summary of the bids received and will make a recommendation on awarding the sale to the bidder with the lowest cost. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Accept the recommendation of our bond consultant and award the sale of bonds to the lowest responsible bidder. (_ 2. Do not sell bonds --this is not a feasible alternative since the improvement projects are awarded and under construction. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In order to receive the proceeds in a timely manner, it is assumed that the bids received will be favorable in regard to the recent interest rate reductions and that the Council should award the sale to the lowest bidder as recommended by Springsted. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None--Proposod resolution authorizing the sale will be provided by Springsted at the meeting. 14 Council Agenda - 8/26/91 Consideration of resolution adoptinq a proposed preliminary 1992 budqet and settinq a proposed tax levy,. (R.W.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: In order to meet state requirements for adopting city budgets, the City is required to adopt a preliminary budget and a preliminary tax levy by September 1 and certify this amount to the county auditor, or the City is limited to its previous year's levy amount. Although the levy amount proposed for Monday night cannot officially be the final levy, the county will use our proposed levy adopted for mailing out Truth In Taxation notices to all property owners this fall. A final budget and tax levy public hearing cannot be held by the City Council until late November, and it is assumed that the City will be proposing a final levy that is the same as the one proposed for Monday night. In order to protect our levy requirements, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution proposing a levy that is the maximum allowed by state statutes. Later on through our budget process, the City Council can always lower the levy if it deems necessary but can never go hiqher than the one proposed by September 1. In other words, you can always go down, but you can never go up. For 1992, preliminary estimates indicate that we will probably need to levy the maximum allowed in that our levy is only proposed to increase by approximately 1.38 over last year's levy. In reality, the actual amount of dollars collected from taxpayers will still be less than 1991 even though the proposed levy appears to increase $36,388 over 1991's levy. The reason for this is that last year we adopted a levy of $2,752,778. As a result of the City being eligible to receive homestead credit reimbursements from the state again, only $2,506,132 was actually levied against property owners, with the remaining $246,646 to be reimbursed by the state through the homestead credit program. The end result should have been the same revenue for the City that we had expected, except that the State of Minnesota later determined that In order to help balance their budget, they wore going to reduce homestead credit payments to the cities. As a result of this reduction, we will actually receive $99,276 less than we had anticipated in 1991. In light of this lost revenue in 1991, I believe it will be important for the City to levy the maximum allowable in 1992 to make up for this shortfall. Even the maximum levy allowable in 1992 will only give us $36,000 more than we levied last year, but every little bit helps. Council Agenda - 8/26/91 While the staff has not yet gone over each department or fund budget in detail, I have reviewed the entire budget and prepared an estimate for next year on a preliminary basis. The summary calculations included with the agenda are just estimates at this point until a more detailed budget can be given to the Council for review. Since our final budget does not have to be adopted until late November, you will receive a more detailed budget analysis at which time we can schedule a budget workshop or discuss the budget at a regular Council meeting prior to our official public hearing adoption. All city, school district, and county budgets must be adopted at a public hearing somewhere between November 15 and December 20. The school district and the county have first choice of dates for their public hearings and public hearing continuation dates with the cities getting third choice. The school district has set their public hearing date for December 2 with a continuation date of December 9; and the Wright County public hearing has been set for December 3 with a continuation date of December 11. In order to have our public hearing on a regularly scheduled Council meeting date, it is suggostod that the City Council schedule our second meeting in November, November 25, as the public hearing date to adopt the final budget and tax levy. A continuation date could be Wednesday, December 4, if needed. The City cannot have its hearing date or continuation date on any date previously scheduled by the school or the county. While the proposed 1992 budget will have some adjustments made prior to final adoption, major items have been accounted for in the overall funds and departments that the staff is aware of, and I fool the proposed preliminary budget will be fairly close to the estimates provided. The levy increase proposed of $36,388 only amounts to 1.39 over last year's, which is very minimal. Adjustments may occur between individual funds, but I anticipate the total levy requirements to remain the same. What the proposed budget levy does include at this time is: - a 59 wage adjustment - a 68 increase in the police contract from $24.50 per hour to $26.00 per hour - a refuse collection budgot that is anticipating a tipping fee increase of $65,000 and the possible purchase of some roll -around containers for residences - normal coat adjustments throughout the budget - a substantial capital outlay revolving fund L Council Agenda - 8/26/91 What the budget proposed does not include would be any cost associated with possible City Hall expansion project or any public works facilities building expansions. It is assumed any building projects would be either financed through a bond sale or could possibly be considered from liquor store surplus fund balances. The liquor store should have cash and investments by year end of approximately $750,000. In preparing this proposed tax levy, revenue projections for 1992 were left at approximately the same level as 1991. Once the budget is further refined, there may be some additional revenues that could be used to reduce the tax levy requirement. a. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Adopt the resolution setting the proposed tax levy at the maximum allowable of $2,789,166. This would result in a 1.38 increase over 1991's tax levy. Upon completion of the final budget, I do not anticipate that this levy will be reduced. In addition, the Council must set a public hearing date for adoption of the 1992 tax levy, and it is suggested that November 25, 1991, be set as the date of the public hearing, with the public hearing continuation date, if necessary, for December 4. The public hearing date, along with the proposed tax levy, must be submitted to the county auditor by September 3. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: With the resulting loss of over $99,000 in anticipated revenue in 1991, I believe it will be necessary to adopt the maximum levy allowable for 1992 as proposed. The increase of 1.38 is minimal and will be necessary to continue our present program and budget needs. After a more detailed budget is prepared, the Council may wish to set up a budget workshop to review the proposed budget in more detail at which time adjustmonts can be made prior to our November 25 public hearing. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Preliminary budget summaries; Preliminary tax levy summaries; Resolution adopting proposed tax levy for 1992. GENERAL FUND SUMMARY 1992 BUDGET REVENUE Taxes Current Ad Valorem $1,442,170 Penalty/Interest 5,000 $1,447,170 Licenses and Permits - Business Liquor 16,750 Beer 1,675 Set Ups 325 $ 18,750 Licenses and Permits - Non -Business Building Permits 40,000 Variances/Conditional Uses 1,500 Dog Licenses 200 Others 2,000 $ 43,700 Inter -Governmental Fire Department Aid 37,000 Police Department Aid 18,000 $ 55,000 Charqes for Services General Government 500 Public Safety (Township Contract) 44,000 Streets - C.S.A.H. Mtnc. 4,000 Deputy Registrar 75,000 Other 750 Subdivision Fees 250 Special Processing Fee (Garbage) 4,000 Recycling Incentive 4,800 Inspection Fees 81000 f 141,300 Fines Animal Impoundment 12,000 t 12,000 Miscellaneous Revenue Interest on Investments 65,000 Salo of Property 100 Contributions/Donations/ Park Dedications 2,400 Other 200 $ 67,700 Rofunde and Reimbursements Administration/ 11,000 Inspoctlon Projects f 11,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $1,796,620 1 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY 1992 BUDGET EXPENDITURES Mayor and Council $ 19,225 Administration 161,400 Finance 75,565 Insurance 53,325 Audit 13,000 Legal 24,175 Planning a Zoning 36,295 Inspections --Bldg. Official 34,290 Assessing 18,585 Deputy Registrar 62,250 City Hall 51,615 Computer 33,350 Elections 4,010 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT Law Enforcement $190,350 Fire 115,775 Civil Defense 6,810 Animal Control 22,925 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY inspection S 30,600 Admin. b Engineering 70,170 Streets & Alloys 196,200 Snow 6 Ice 12,600 Street Lighting 43,100 Public Parking Lots Shop 6 Garage 21,855 Refuse Collection 279,100 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS Senior Citizens/Museum $ 37,750 YMCA/Community Ed. 24,500 TOTAL HEALTH 6 WELFARE Parks 6 Roc./Cometory $118,125 TOTAL PARKS 6 RECREATION Community Development S 39,675 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES jr $ 587,085 $ 335,860 S 653,625 $ 62,250 $ 118,125 $ 39,675 $1,796,620 IL_n 1992 BUDGET SUMMARY o 1992 1991 FUND REVENUE EXPENDITURES REVENUE EXPENDITURES General $1,796,620 $1,796,620 $1,801,005 $1,801,005 Library 29,736 29,236 26,500 26,500 Transportation 72,182 72,182 72,739 72,739 Shade Tree 32,325 32,325 44,350 44,350 UDAG 14,800 -0- 13,925 -0- OAA 30,625 30,625 31,625 31,625 HRA 351,475 280,120 278,850 216,170 EDA 11,215 2,360 10,850 2,250 Debt Service 1,652,832 1,671,500 1,652,503 1,780,500 Liquor 1,373,950 1,215,875 1,289,250 1,155,200 I ` .ater 142,425 136,040 141,055 141,055 Sewer 446,515 446,515 426,890 426,890 Capital Imp. 271,462 242,500 167,254 236,000 Water Imp. 12,400 19,200 11,100 -0- Sewer Imp. 11,300 10,000 14,800 95,000 TOTAL $6,249,862 $5,985,098 $5,982,696 $6,029,284 o l'J TAR LEVY SUMMARY 1992 BUDGET ALL FUNDS Fund Payable 1992 Payable 1991 8 Chanqe General $1,442,170 $1,444,290 Library 29,236 26,400 Transportation 17,688 19,787 Shade Tree 26,825 39,135 OAA 30,075 30,225 HRA 13,100 19,250 Debt Service 979,810 1,021,937 Capital Imp. Revolving 250,262 151,754 TOTAL $2,789,166 $2,752,778 1.38 Levy Increase - $36,388 Payable 1983 Mill Rate . . . . . . . . 20.978 Payable 1984 Mill Rate . . . . . . . . 17.734 Payable 1985 Mill Rate . . . . . . . . 18.874 Payable 1986 Mill Rate . . . . . . . . 15.689 Payable 1987 Mill Rate . . . . . . . . 15.715 Payable 1988 Mill Rate . . . . . . . . 15.932 Payable 1989 Tax Capacity Rate 14.283 Payable 1990 Tax Capacity Rate 16.187 Payable 1991 Tax Capacity Rate 15.511 Assessed Valuation Mill Rate Tax Levy '82/Payable 1983 $ 58,492,537 20.978 $1,227,064 '83/Payablo 1984 71,114,939 17.734 1,260,475 184/Payablo 1985 79,954,554 18.874 1,509,003 '85/Payable 1986 100,568,378 15.689 1,577,250 '86/Payable 1987 106,722,013 15.715 1,676,900 '87/Payable 1988 114,339,670 15.932 1,821,370 Tax Tax Capacity Value Capacity Rate Tax Levy '88/Payablo 1989 S 15,405,139 14.283 $2,198,008 189/Payablo 1990 15,873,242 16.187 2,568,106 '90/Payablo 1991 16,161,043 15.511 2,506,132 l'J MAXIMUM LEVY LIMIT CALCULATIONS General levy limit established by state Special levies Library Bonded Debt Maximum Lovy Limit Actual Levy Adopted 1991 1992 $1,780,120 $1,780,120 28,384 29,236 1,021,848 979,810 $2,830,352 $2,789,166 $2,752,778• 7 • Although our 1991 levy certified for collection was $2,752,778, only $2,506,132 was actually levied against property owners. The $246,646 difference was to be paid to us by the state as homestead credit. Unfortunately, the state decided that they needed to try and balance their budget at our expense, and the City will only receive $147,370. As a result, our 1991 revenue will be $99,276 less than we had expected. 17 C: i City Hall EXAMPLES OF CAPITAL OUTLAY ITEMS INCLUDED IN PROPOSED 1992 LEVY b BUDGET Plain paper fax machine $ 4,000 Filing cabinets for improvement projects 1,500 Brick repair 6 sealing 15,000 Temporary room/desk dividers 1,500 Data Processinq Tape drive backup system $ 2,000 Query 36 software 375 Accounts receivable software 3,600 Increased memory 6 fonts for printer 1,500 Programming for parcel/bldg permit system 5,000 Street Replacement truck for 1981 Chev $55,000 Sealcoating program 47,500 1 -ton truck with contractor dump 24,000 Sidewalk improvement project 28,500 r Inspections Locator $ 650 Refuse Landfill tipping fee increase $65,000 Roll -around containers 15,000 Parke West Bridge Park building 6 parking $60,000 Lights in (2) softball fields 75,000 (3) bleachers at softball fields 3,600 Trees 5,000 Picnic tablos 2,500 Kiosk 5,000 Landscaping at information center 3,000 Treo Chain saw $ 500 Troo roplacomont 1,000 Wastewater Treatment Plant Drying bode $10,000 9 1992 Capital Outlay List Page 2 Water Leak detection headphones $ 1,400 Remodel pump house Al 1,000 Chlorine scale, pump house Al 1,300 Chlorine alarm, pump houses #1 6 &2 3,000 Control system 4,500 Used 1 -ton pickup with boom 8,000 Sewer Collection Safety boom Sonic beeper L ,a $ 3,800 300 0 C RESOLUTION 91- RESOLUTI0N ADOPTING A PROPOSED 1992 BUDGET AND SETTING A PROPOSED TAX LEVY WHEREAS, the City Administrator has prepared and submitted to the City Council a proposed budget setting forth therein his estimated needs of the City of Monticello for all operations and the debt service for the fiscal year commencing January 1, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO that the proposed budget so submitted by the City Administrator is adopted as a preliminary budget for the fiscal year commencing January 1, 1992, and be it further resolved by the Council of the City of Monticello that there be, and hereby Is, levied for the fiscal year commending on January 1, 1992, and the following sums for the respective purposes indicated therein, upon the taxable property of the City of Monticello, to wit: Revenue General $1,442,170 Library 29,236 OAA 30,075 HRA 13,100 Tree 26,825 Transportation 17,688 Debt Retirement Debt service funds 5 979,810 Capital Improvements Capital improvement revolving 5 250,262 TOTAL PROPOSED TAX LEVY $2,789,166 The above resolution was introduced by Councilmember was duly secondod by Councilmembor with the following voting in favor: Opposed, The City Administrator is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Wright County, Minnesota. Dated this 26th day of August, 1991. Mayor City Administrator 0 Council Agenda - 8/26/91 6. Consideration of a request by a group of citizens to adopt East Bridqe Park. Request includes development of an arboretum. (J.O.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Parks Commission received a request from Georgia Gould, 207 East River Street; Robert Doty, 225 East River Street; Mary Hook, 414 East River Street; Bud and Virginia Henniker, Box 29, Monticello; Pat Fair, 243 East Broadway; and Fran Fair, 219 East River Street. This group requests that the City Council allow them to develop a landscape arboretum at East Bridge Park. This request is above and beyond the adopt - a -park program and requires Council action because the group requests that the City allow them to make changes to the existing park. Under normal circumstances, the adopt -a -park program only calls for the group to provide cleanup or grooming of park areas. Under the proposal submitted by the group, all shrubs or other plantings associated with the arboretum would be provided entirely by private donations. All maintenance of the shrubs would also be done by private individuals. No City staff time would be involved in maintenance of shrubs, etc. A video presentation will be presented which will show the proposed location of the arboretum area, and a handout will be provided that also shows the location of the shrubs. Representa tives from this group will be available at the meeting to answer any questions regarding the proposed arboretum. In preparation for development of the arboretum, a few boxelder trees will need to be taken down by City crews, and a supply of wood chips necessary to develop pathways will also need to be provided by the City. As you may know, there is an ample amount of wood chips in storage that. the City has available for this type of use. It appears that the initial cost to the City to develop this arboretum is minimal, especially when you consider that the boxelder trees would have boon removed with or without the development of this arboretum. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to authorize development of a portion of East Bridge Park as a landscape arboretum as proposed by the citizens listed above. Under this alternative, the project would proceed. The cost to the City Is essentially the cost to prepare the site, which Is somewhat nominal. In terms of long-term maintenance, the group adopting the park has Indicated that they will provide all maintenance associated with grooming, trimming, and replanting arboretum shrubs. Council Agenda - 8/26/91 2. Notion to deny authorization allowing the group to develop an arboretum at East Bridge Park. Under this alternative, Council could take the position that the adopt -a -park program is primarily for groups that wish to clean up parks. It is not intended to be used for those who wish to make changes to existing park facilities. Council may not wish to create the possibility of a long-term maintenance problem which could occur in the event that this group discontinues the adopt -a -park program. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council accept the Parks Commission recommendation to allow development of an arboretum at East Bridge Park as proposed. The area proposed for development of the arboretum is well suited for the type of vegetation proposed and will add to the charm of East Bridge Park. The cost to prepare the site is minimal, and the potential for long-term maintenance expense appears to be small. r D. SUPPORTING DATA: Site plan Showing location of arboretum area at East Bridge Park and video to be presented at meeting. F Council Agenda - 8/26/91 7. Consideration of contracting with the Leaque of Minnesota Cities personnel project to achieve compliance with pay equity requirements. (J.0.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff requests authorization to enter into a contract with the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) personnel project for the purpose of development of a pay equity plan that will be acceptable to the Minnesota Department of Employee and Labor Relations (DEOR). The request to amend the current pay equity plan and contract with the LMC stems from the following problem. The City must comply with the pay equity act by December 31, 1991, or face stiff penalties. According to the League of Minnesota Cites, our pay equity plan and pay equity practice now in place may not comply with state pay equity law passed in 1984 and updated in 1990. According to the amemdments to the Local Government Pay Equity Act adopted by the state legislature in 1990, local governments must establish equitable compensation relationships to the satisfaction of the rommiRAinn rather than just implementing their plans. The penalty for noncompliance is a 58 reduction in local government aid or $100 per day, whichever is greater. What is wrong with the present pay equity system used by the City of Monticello, and why might our system fail to meet pay equity standards? The present system is difficult and costly to maintain. As a consequence, the existing job descriptions and pay equity program are outdated and may not reflect reality. In 1986 a consortium of cities, including Monticello, worked with Control Data to develop a pay equity or comparable worth plan. Under the original plan, each city prepared a complete job description following the format designed by Control Data. The job description data was then fed into the computer, which used a complex formula for ranking positions in terms of comparable worth. Each position was assigned a point value and ranked accordingly. It was then incumbent upon the City to develop a pay plan based on the points. The existing computerized job ranking is expensive to maintain. Like many other cities in the computer consortium, Monticello has not boon willing to spend the money on the computer time necessary to maintain the system adopted in 1986. The process of updating each job description and acquiring a now job ranking is quite costly, and the cost to purchase the software is in the neighborhood of $8,000. No Council Agenda - 8/26/91 computerized updates to the present ranking have been conducted since 1986, even though many jobs have changed and new positions have been added. In our discussions with League personnel regarding our staffing personnel, it was their opinion that we probably had 21 or 22 separate job classifications. In other words, each individual position was different in duties and responsibilities and each should have its own classification. Our present system allows for only six classes with a number of jobs being in similar classes. The League felt that it becomes more difficult to meet the comparable worth law under this situation. Also, you will note that the League's proposal would be to develop a salary range and progression schedule within each range as part of their proposal. While the City plan currently has a minimum and maximum salary indicated for each job class, there has never been a system developed for an individual to move within the salary range. Typically, there is a set method adopted that allows an individual to receive adjustments within the salary range for their class, and this is something we had never addressed within our plan. In light of the changes that have occurred over the past five years, major alterations will have to be made to our plan to comply with state laws if the League's proposal is not utilized. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to authorize City staff to work with the League of Minnesota Cities personnel project to develop a pay oquity plan that will comply with state pay equity law at an estimated cost of $4,370. Under this alternative, City staff would work with the League of Minnesota Cities toward development of a simplified, non -computerized pay equity plan that could be updatod and maintained with greater ease. The design of the pay equity system for ranking positions would be similar to systems used by the City of Buffalo and the City of Princeton. Utilization of the League of Minnesota Cities' expertise would contribute toward dovolopment of an objective pay equity plan that would likely moot DEOR requirements. Please see the proposal submitted by the LMC for more detail regarding the scope of the project. Motion to deny authorization to enter into a contract with the LMC and direct staff to prepare pay equity plan. d Council Agenda - 8/26/91 Under this alternative, Rick or I would work to comply with pay equity law without the assistance of outside help. This would include the following: 1. Preparation of new job descriptions for all positions. 2. Evaluate positions using the "Princeton" job evaluation system using information gained from the job descriptions. 3. Development of salary ranges for each job class and development of a salary progression system. This alternative will require a large amount of administrative staff time, which will result in the sacrifice of other duties. In addition, it is likely that a pay equity plan developed with the assistance of outside help may have more credibility than a plan developed entirely by city administrators. 3. Motion to deny authorization to enter into a contract with the LMC and direct staff to prepare pay equity plan based on the existing computerized system. As a third option, Council could direct staff to update existing job descriptions using the present computerized format. This alternative would, in the long run, be the most expensive, and it has already been proven difficult to maintain. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends that Council select alternative 01. Based on our discussion with LMC representatives, it is our view that they have the expertise and abilities necessary to assist us in achieving compliance with pay equity law. In terms of cost, it is likely that the administrative staff Limo saved by selecting alternative tl will help to offset the fee Charged by the LMC and will result in a superior plan. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Proposal outlining LMC services; Summary of amendments to Local Government Pay Equity Act, 1990 Minnesota State Legislative Session. 3 1, League of Minnesota Cities March 26, 1991 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101.2526 (612)227.5600(FAX:221-0996) Mayor Ken Maus Members of the Council City of Monticello 1230 West River Street Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Mayor Maus and Members of the Council: I have recently discussed the possibility of providing some personnel assistance to your City with your City Administrator and Assistant Administrator. They indicated that you may be interested in utilizing the League's personnel project to reevaluate your jobs and redo the pay equity analysis. This letter contains our proposal for the requested personnel services. They would include: 1. Development of job descriptions for twenty-one city job classes. Iitis will include interviews with the employees and their immediate supervisors. In cases where several employees do the same job, a subgroup of those employees will be interviewed together. (Estimated at 30 hours for interviews and 25 hours of office time preparing for interviews and drafting and editing job descriptions.) 2. Evaluation of the twenty-one positions using a modkr d version of the Princeton job evaluation system, using information gained from the interviews and job descriptions. (Estimated at 12 hours) 3. Development of salary ranges for each job class using relevant market data from cities of comparable size as well as the job evaluation results. This will include development of a salary progression system and recommendations on initial placement of employees into the salary ranges. (Estimated at 15 hours) 4. Analysis of the job evaluation results as compared to current salaries to determine any actions necessary to comply with the Minnesota Local Government Pay Equity Act. (Estimated at 8 hours) l 5. Preparation of a final report with the findings. (Estimated at 8 hours) 1' 0 Mayor Ken Maus March 26, 1991 C_ Members of the City Council Page 2 The League of Minnesota Cities Personnel Project agrees to provide the requested services for an hourly rate of $40. The project is anticipated to take 98 hours. In addition, there would be approximately 12 hours of travel time assuming 6 trips at 2 hours roundtrip. The League charges for one-half of the travel time at the normal hourly rate. The total hours are therefore estimated at 104 (98+6). Expenses would include mileage and meals. Mileage is estimated based on 660 miles x.265 per mile. The total expenses are estimated at $210. The total cost for the proposal is estimated at 54370. It is understood that the work will be done in cooperation with either Rick Wolfsteller and/or Jeff O'Neil. It is also understood that if the actual cost of performing these services exceeds 110% of the estimate, the League will receive no additional compensation. A detailed project report will be provided documenting actual hours spent on the project If you should decide to accept this proposal, work will commence early in the fourth quarter of 1991. If at all possible, work will begin in the third quarter. It is estimated to take approximately two months. Payment for the work will be as follows: 5500 upon your acceptance of this proposal; 'balance to be paid at the end of the project. If you have any questions, comments, or revisions of the above arrangements, please call me at (612) 227-5600. If these arrangements are acceptable, please sign and return one of the enclosed copies of this letter and keep the other executed copy for your files. Sin rel , e ry Personnel Analyst cc: Rick Wolfsteller City Administrator L U The terms contained herein for services are accepted and the above constitutes a contract between the League of Minnesota Cities and the City of Monticello. League of Minnesota Cities City of Monticello , 0"�' a L' V ' Donald Slater, Executive Director Ken Maus, Mayor And Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator 01 CThe terms contained herein for services are accepted and the above constitutes a contract between the League of Minnesota Cities and the City of Monticello. League of Minnesota Cities City of Monticello By 0" a / Donald Slater, Executive Director Ken Maus, Mayor And Rick WoUsteller, City Administrator Q May 16, 1990 Summary of Amendments to Local Government Pay Equity Act 1990 Minnesota State Legislative Session r \ 1. Definition 'Equitable compensation relationship means that the compensation for female -dominated classes is not consistently below the compensation for male -dominated classes of comparable work value within the political subdivision.' 2. Purpose Purpose of pay equity is clarified.' ..to eliminate sex -based wage disparities in public employment in this. state.' Also clarifies that this law does not limit good faith collective bargaining. 3. Balanced Classes in arbitration and collective bargaining for these classes, job evaluation study may be considered, but pay of similar job classifications in other political subdivisions must be considered. 4. Job Evaluation System Local governments must update and maintain systems and Department of Employee Relations must be notified if system is substantially changed or a new system is adopted. 5. Report A new implementation report will be required in 1992 after the compliance deadline of ner,ember 31, 1991. Report is public data. {- 6. Penalties Clarifies that local governments must establish equitable compensation relationships to the satisfaction of the commissioner rather than just implementing their plans. Process is established for communication between commissioner and local governments about hardships or constraints. The penalty for noncompliance is a 5% reduction in local government aid or $100 per day, whichever is greater. 7. Appeal Local governments can appeal their case to an administrative law judge if no agreement can be reached with the commissioner and the local government is ruled out of compliance. 8. Court Administrators Job evaluation study would be considered prima facie evidence that local government did not act arbitrarily in setting pay if pay was compatible with job evaluation system. 9. Repeaters 01d dates. Clean up. Faith 7.wemke L Pay Equity Coordinator MN Department of Employee Relations 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 612-29b-2653 g Council Agenda - 8/26/91 Consideration of proposals for demolition or removal of the O.G. Bland house for Citv Hall parking lot expansion project. (J.S.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As requested by the Council, City staff has looked at various alternatives developed specifications and solicited proposals from four area contractors for the demolition or removal of the O.G. Bland house. The specifications allow for moving of the house by a moving contractor or removal of the house by demolition. The proposals are due back on Monday prior to the Council meeting. The time table for removal of the house is such that contractors would have approximately two weeks after notice to proceed to remove the house or demolish it. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to award the demolition or removal project to the lowest responsible proposer. This option appears to be most appropriate, as it has been determined that the parking lot expansion will encompass the area of the house. 2. The second alternative would be not to demolish the house at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Assuming that the proposals come within the estimates as provided in the previous agenda item, City staff recommends awarding the project as outlined in alternative #1. SUPPORTING DATA: Please refor to past Council agenda items on this subject. The specifications for house removal or demolition are not included due to their bulk but are available at City Hall. PROPOSAL FORM FOR BUILDING REMOVAL OR DEMOLITION AND SITE PREPARATION FOR THE OLD O.G. BLAND HOUSE AT 213 PALM STREET CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA TO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA GENTLEMEN: 1. The following proposal is made for building demolition or removal and site preparation of the old O.G. Bland house. 2. The undersigned certifies that the project specifications have been carefully examined and that the work site has been personally inspected. The undersigned declares that the amount and nature of the work to be done is understood, and at no time will misunderstanding of the specifications be pleaded. On the basis of the specifications, the undersigned proposes to furnish all necessary apparatus and other means of construction end/or demolition to do all the work and furnish all the materials in the manner specified to finish the entire project within the time hereinafter specified, and to accept as full compensation therefor the sum stated below. 3. Base Proposal Demolish or remove the old O.G. Bland house and appurtenances as specified, prepare the site as specified, and transport all debris to a state permitted demolitign disposal site for a total lylmp �u'>! i (fin T(.,/S.- y� 4. The Owner reserves the right to award to the lowest responsible contractor as determined to be in the best Interest of the City. 5. The undersigned further proposes to execute the contract agreement and to furnish satisfactory bond within five (5) days after notice of the award of contract has been received. The undersigned further proposes to begin work as specified, to complete the work on or before date specified, and to maintain at all times a contract bond approved by the City in an amount equal to the total bid. DEM2SPEC: 8/9/91 Page 3 6. In submitting this proposal, it is understood that the right is reserved by the owner to reject any or all proposals and to waive informalities. 7. This proposal may not be withdrawn after the opening of the proposals and shall be subject to acceptance by the owner for a period of thirty (30) calendar days from the opening thereof. 8. If a corporation, what is the state of incorporation: 9. If a partnership, state full names of all co -partnere: OFFICIAL ADDRESS: FIRM NAME: %C t• �1IIC�� _�n.3 Sr L L.�/n�-�� n^S.�y� �u�/ Mvn��,rl/lv. inJ � n� BYU 7� TITLE BY TITLE DATE DEM2SPEC: 8/9/91 Pago 4 -� PROPOSAL FORM FOR BUILDING REMOVAL OR DEMOLITION AND SITE PREPARATION FOR THE OLD O.G. BLAND HOUSE AT 213 PALM STREET CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA TO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA GENTLEMEN: 1. The following proposal is made for building demolition or removal and site preparation of the old O.G. Bland house. 2. The undersigned certifies that the project specifications have been carefully examined and that the work site has been personally inspected. The undersigned declares that the amount and nature of the work to be done is understood, and at no time will misunderstanding of the specifications be pleaded. On the basis of the specifications, the undersigned proposes to furnish all necessary apparatus and other means of construction and/or demolition to do all the work and furnish all the materials in the manner specified to finish the entire project within the time hereinafter specified, and to accept as full compensation therefor the sum stated below. 3. Base Proposal Demolish or remove the old O.G. Bland house and appurtenances as specified, prepare the site as specified, and transport all debris to a state permitted demolition disposal site for a total lump sum Of Twrnty nine hundred ninety five and nn/100 - — (S 2.995.00 �• 4. The Owner resorvos the right to award to the lowest responsible contractor as determined to be in the beat interest of the City. 5. Cho undersigned further proposes to execute the contract agreement and to furnish satisfactory bond within five (5) days after notice of the award of contract has boon recoived. The undersignod further proposoo to begin work as specified, to complete the work on or before date specified, and to maintain at all times a contract bond approved by the City in an amount equal to the total bid. DEM2SPEC: 8/9/91 Pago 3 6. In submitting this proposal, it is understood that the right is reserved by the owner to reject any or all proposals and to waive informalities. 7. This proposal may not be withdrawn after the opening of the proposals and shall be subject to acceptance by the owner for a period of thirty (30) calendar days from the opening thereof. B. If a corporation, what is the state of incorporation: 9. If a partnership, state full names of all co-partners: OFFICIAL ADDRESS: FIRM NAME: FYLE'S EXCAVATING 8 MONEY WAGON Rt. d2, Box 76 Monticello, Mn 55362 BY ,�� .�1'lY►� C! TITLE OWNER BY TITLE DATE DEM2SPEC: 8/9/91 Page 4 9. Consideration of desiqn and cost estimates alonq with the City beinq the general contractor for remodeling of the information/Chamber buildinq. (J.S.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As directed by City Council, staff has drawn preliminary floor plans for the addition of restrooms to the remodeled information/Chamber building and completed the site survey work as necessary to design the proposed addition. On Thursday, August 15, we met with OSM's architect, Gunner Unger. He will be developing the architectural drawings as needed for state agency approval as well as preparing cost estimates for the construction. There are basically four phases of work for the project: 1) add the addition containing the restrooms; 2) the demolition of the old restrooms; and 3) restoration or change of the architectural appearance of the buildings and walls; and 4) a new landscaping plan. Because of the complexity of this small site and the time frame, it may be best for the City of Monticello to be the general contractor. We would solicit quotes for each phase of the work and, thereby, control the time table under which the project is completed. We would expect to get the shell up for 1 the restrooms prior to cold weather setting in and also to _ replace the doors and windows as necessary in the main building. It may not be possible to complete all of the exterior building work prior to the onset of cold weather and may be best to hold off the entire refurbishment of the exterior of the buildings and walls until the old rostrooms are gone, more than likely in the spring. After aemolition of the old restrooms and the refurbishment of the building exteriors, the landscaping could be done. The Monticello Parks Commission is currently working on some plans for the landscaping. A preliminary proposed schedule could be as follows: 1. Cost and concept plan approval 08/26/91 2. Solicitation of construction quotes (duo) 09/09/91 3. Start of construction concrete work 09/16/91 4. Completion of exterior shell, building closed in 10/07/91 5. Completion of utility connections and entrance sidewalk 10/21/91 6. Completion of plumbing, heating, and electrical 11/20/91 7. Completion of interior 12/10/91 8. Demolition of old restrooms 05/30/92 Council Agenda - 8/26/91 l 9. Completion of building exteriors 05/10/92 10. Completion of landscaping 06/15/92 The above schedule could be modified depending on how the project is to proceed. If the Chamber and the public could do without the existing bathrooms, we could demolish those with the initial part of the project; however, if that were done, the new restrooms would not be usable until sometime in December. If the restrooms were left in place, the Chamber could probably occupy the building sometime in October and use the existing restrooms until the new ones are ready. Cost Estimates Estimated Costs as Total Bid 1. Excavation, footings b foundation $ 1,757 2. Block work 8,444 3. Roof structure 1,297 4. Gutter, shingles s insulation 1,782 5. Doors 6 windows (bathrooms) 3,000 6. Stucco 6 paint 3,364 7. Specialty items: grab bare, mirrors, phone booth, etc 2,460 8. Existing building windows, doors, b paneling; also reroof north side over existing 4,317 9. Plumbing, heating 6 air conditioning 14,000 10. Electrical 3,500 TOTAL (excluding contingencies) $ 43,921 Outside Work 1. Sower and water hookup $ 800 2. Demolition of existing restrooms 1,500 3. Landscaping 3,000 TOTAL (outside) S 5,300 Architect 1. Estimated architect foes $ 5.500 GRAND TOTAL S 54,721 Savings as General Contractor 1. 6 1/29 of fixtures 6 materials S 1,400 2. General markup and profit - 20% 81800 TOTAL SAVINGS S 10,300 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST S 41,421 A I Council Agenda - 8/26/91 There are other issues that the Council should probably discuss regarding the above -referenced costs. That is, some type of indication as to what part the Chamber will play in paying for the improvements. At some of the meetings, rent was talked about to cover the information building remodeling cost, possibly over ten years. There was some talk about interest and no interest. I'll have to look at this and give the Chamber some idea of what the costs will be, as well as whether the utilities are included, what type of insurance is needed by either party, and how many hours per year the Senior Citizens Center provides people to man the information center when the Chamber people are not there. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative is to approve the cost estimates and preliminary plans, authorize the City and the architect to prepare final plans, and begin obtaining quotes for the construction with the City acting as the general contractor, with reports to the City Council at each Council meeting during the progress of the project. 2. The second alternative is to put together an entire bid package and have the project done by one contractor. This may be the simplest as far as staff is concerned; however, it could be the most costly as well and the most time consuming, so the completion for the project may take longer. 3. The third alternative would be to do nothing at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the cost estimates are within those thought proper by the City Council, City staff recommends alternative 61. Funding would have to come from items in the budget not purchased this year such as a portion of the tractor mower in the public works department or the now restrooms in Bridge Park or surplus funds. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of information from OSM and drawing of floor plan. 3 P2.nPet ao r, L__4_Q OF 'A.DD'N TO INJFoP_MA;•rlOm 4; � Gil'Y O� t•-Sa��.�w�NtN. Ci4Mt A'S�aG7L. ! tjc . jA: u 4 20, t o ci l / APJA�4_ &LD6, r ! IL -O i = � WlJnn�N� 'STUGG.c� GXT, MAiGH 11�wh, 4ERV. ' / 4 vrIL. RM. '% cy auau• c. ;L 5' cage, . . / Blla. rYr. 8wc / mew f- tz9•4t:. (taw) 3B .. .. _ ... .. . _ _.. ..... - _-� ._ �xrsr. $LOC _..._,.__. I I i N la 5 t-1 C t I PnGE NO --- J-4—PAGES Pa GES .ne ../14 �— I DESCRIPTION 4-' o. s 3 Ac 'l-vt4� a +,61 EXTENSION i IIII I II IIII 300 4dri PAGE NO ZOF —4— PnGES t�M :EG u I O E SCR I P T 10N OWN. o EXTENSON III � II I � IIII I II G Gitws I I � d -o c Lf- e I�IsI L., 'r III T�.��..A - �� • R 33 �20� ll. �1� t,.JG,I��y af., ro R 4 std' I.74 (Fp T I I tI4Ve. J „ _1 I T) Pj 'no �t1'�Y W�RHn✓ q '_' . a 71 • rgTAL5 'r +r S 1 /, PAGE ti0 � OF ti•._pAGES —1,✓Jh.S.� iff Ic R (044- J n oP VI J C DESCRIPTION OUAN. a I I EXTENSION I bJL � III I III � I l i I I i ii�� III I III I I II III 4- 7- 2 dl {7I I I I I L / rl, ► 1a1� �LLerxr �mDf/�.,-C��GIp4.lelY_{-1 I I I II ,.nnu ®�rrx.r TOTALS y •t T —1,✓Jh.S.� iff Ip R (044- J n oP VI J Z fz ,r,mr� �.r�h�...�j • bJL � ,.nnu ®�rrx.r TOTALS y •t T v u --Dr l tz I PAGEN0 4--4—pnGES �� ij . Ta iL.it �_.__ �1� _ ly ��SS �L. �.t,1 • I � � ...-� �u i 0 ESC AIPT ION Flrao✓ �a......c �ur n .E l vv« w i1 {7�u•C. k O'S. EXTENSION 1 V r v 4- _72�v. Iii i— I bZ _ r X111 I S �tia.:,. `• i T s� I � i 9 - Dtv 'os� Ai 45��t•C�a�`Ib,,�.i TOTAL! '��s c.•...1. 77.PIL � 1 10. Update on Citv Hall parking lot expansion. (J.S.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff has been looking at alternate ways to construct the City Hail parking lot expansion. Until last Thursday, we were not sure that we were going to have a construction project involving LaTour, so we were unable to look at the possibility of doing the parking lot project as a change order with one of the construction projects. In addition, we were discussing the pros and cons of replacing the existing parking lot surface in conjunction with the expansion. Although the surface is serviceable at this time, it is nearing the downhill side of its life cycle and, more than likely, we would be faced with overlaying that surface within the next three to five years. In addition, replacement of the leaking telephone conduit and repairs to the electrical conduit would be easier if the bituminous surface were removed. Also, there would be some inconvenience at City Hall because the existing parking lot would be unavailable for use during the construction period. These factors have complicated the project, and it is felt that we need some further direction from the City Council before we proceed with the project. We have prepared some cost estimates based upon bid prices from LaTour on the main construction projects. We do not, however, have the prices for every item and, consequently, some negotiation may have to take place. The prices, at best, are approximate. The estimated costs for the construction of the lot expansion only, excluding lighting and the repairs to the telephone and electrical conduit, is 614,666.68. To replace the rest of the parking lot paving at this time would cost an additional $4,152.78, for a total of 618,819.46. We have negotiated an overall engineering fee on the large projects of 7% with OSM. However, since the city staff has designed this parking lot and estimated the quantities, we should be able to have substantially less engineering fees from OSM for incorporating into the projects as a change order. Basically, the City Council should decide if they want the entire surface replaced at this time. The Street Superintendent supports that, and I agree. We need Council authorization to make efforts to incorporate the project as a change order. If the costs do not come in line then Iwo need) authorization to proceed with obtaining quotes for the various portions of the work as we could not do the entire project with one contractor without putting together an entire bid package specification as the cost is over 515,000. r\ B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative is to replace the old parking lot surface with the new construction at an estimated cost, excluding those items previously mentioned, of $18,819.46. Should we not be able to negotiate a change order successfully with LaTour and Buffalo Bituminous, their subcontractor, we would then split the project and obtain quotes for the various portions of the work so that the project can be completed this year. 2. The second alternative would be to put the entire package together along with specifications and bid it out in its entirety. 3. The third alternative would be to delay to the future the expansion of the parking lot. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the staff recommendation that the City Council authorize city staff to negotiate a change order with LaTour and, if that fails to produce reasonable figures, to obtain quotes on the various portions of the work and, in a sense, be the general contractor. r D. SUPPORTING DATA: i Copy of the plan for the parking lot; copy of the estimated detail costs. A I BROAD - LL r; � 7 �..� i ��i;�� I I I I 1 T 3.51 CITT -LL P• ING LOT tKftN3(ON 01J) N 1/ 1 CZ p J1 1 ,a t,/ I n I I • l..Y.N �]. �. � % yr � ` iil. Y.n.[. --�LTd-' � LL.•.1 Lj - 0 o 1 \ , 1•J .I.Y .4I .1 Y.1. O , lore IRA— . I E PROPERTY LINE (CONSTRUCTION LIMIT) t Cowl. ra.w �`— . i+e.ur. auu J l I t V" ca, —L —A'.0 '07 armvwa ►L.N ioi. CITY HALL PARKING LOT EXPANSION (New lot paving with 8 1/2" section) (Excluding lights, repairs to conduit, and engineering) Removals B6-18 curb 6 gutter Clear 6 grub stumps Common excavation Concrete driveway Apron Installations B6-18 curb 6 gutter 25' conc d/w apron 135 sq ft Aggregate base Class 5 1-1/2" 2331 bit. base course 1" 2341 bit. wear course Bit. material for tack coat 12" RCP Claes 5 48" storm KH w/casting Catch basin Break into existing storm line TOTAL FOR EXPANSION 250 LF $ 2.00 LF $ 500.00 1 LS 500.00 LS 500.00 1000 CU YD 1.00 CY 1,000.00 1 LS 150.00 LS 150.00 410 LF 7.65 LF 3,136.50 1 LS 300.00 LS 300.00 395 Ton 4.60 Ton 1,817.00 111.3 Ton 19.40 Ton 2,159.22 75.4 Ton 21.40 Ton 1,613.56 64 Gal 1.05 Gal 67.20 112 LF 13.60 LF 1,523.20 1 each 770.00 Ea 770.00 1 each 630.00 Ea 630.00 1 LS 500.00 LS 500.00 $14,666.68 b @ CITY HALL PARKING LOT EXPANSION (Remove and replace existing with 8 1/2" bituminous (Excluding lights, repairs to conduit, and section) engineering) Removals 86-18 curb 6 gutter 250 LF $ 2.00 LF S 500.00 Clear 6 grub stumps 1 LS 500.00 LS 500.00 Common excavation 1050 CU YD 1.00 CY 1,050.00 Concrete driveway apron 1 LS 150.00 LS 150.00 Existing 2" bit. surface 822 SO YD 1.00 SY 822.00 Salvage existing Class 5 182 Ton 1.00 Ton 182.00 Installations B6-18 curb S gutter 410 LF 7.65 LF 3,136.50 25' cone d/w apron 135 sq ft 1 LS 300.00 LS 300.00 Aggregate base Class 5 489 Ton 4.60 Ton 2,249.40 1-1/2" 2331 bit. base course 189 Ton 19.40 Ton 3,666.60 1" 2341 bit. wear course 127.4 Tan 21.40 Ton 2,726.36 Bit. material for tack coat 108 Gal 1.05 Gal 113.40 12" RCP Class 5 112 LF 13.60 LF 1,523.20 48" storm MH w/casting 1 each 770.00 Ea 770.00 Catch basin 1 each 630.00 Ea 630.00 Break into existing storm line 1 LS 500.00 LS 500.00 TOTAL FOR EXPANSION/REPLACEMENT $18,819.46 a �C)Q.�.rt 11. Consideration of setting average quarterly winter sewer use for residential customers who do not use metered city water. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: For the past several years, we have utilized somewhat of an arbitrary figure of $10.00 per person per quarter for sewer usage for households which are not served by city water but are served by city sewer. In order to determine the accuracy of this arbitrary figure, city staff did a study of approximately 50 families to determine the average sewer usage per person during the winter months. The winter sewer usage sets the sewer bill for the entire year. We took a cross-section of families ranging from a single person up to a family of six. Based upon this information, it appears that the average water usage per quarter per person during winter is 700 cubic feet. We would like to have the City Council authorize us to use this figure times the applicable sanitary sewer rate to determine the billing for those households without water meters. In addition, this figure would also be used to calculate the first billings for people moving into a home when no history of usage is available. This particular usage when calculated times the current rate yields a figure of $13.03 per quarter per person for sewer. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative is to authorize city staff to use the average consumption of 700 cubic feet per person per quarter to determine domestic sewer use for those properties that have city sewer but unmotored private water. This alternative fits in quite wall with the computerized utility billing system. This would be effective with the October 1, 1991 billings. 2. The second alternative would be to stick with the existing estimate and change it from time to time to keep it current. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the staff recommendation that City Council authorize the city staff to use the estimated sower usage par person as outlined in alternative O1. As the City Council approves overall sewer rate changes, this figure would automatically keep current. No further changes would be needed unless we determine that the overall average water use is moving in ono direction or the other. ct, D. SUPPORTING DATA: C A record of those families selected in the study are available at city hall; they are not part of the agenda package as we do not wish to publicize individual family water usages. Any council members wishing to view this list, please contact Cathy Shuman prior to the meeting. a Council Agenda - 8/26/91 12. Consideration of a resolution to enter into an agreement with Wright County for construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of CSAH 75, CSAH 39, and CH 118. (J. S.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Signal Justification Study written by Ron Bray of OSM has been successful. The state has accepted the justification study with a slight modification. Wright County is thereby authorized to use municipal state aid funds on the project and Is, therefore, willing to go ahead with the installation. The county has requested that the city use OSM to design and inspect the traffic signal project. Their current funding policy would pay for one half of the project costs estimated at $80,000.00 for construction, $8,800.00 for engineering including the justification report, and $4,000.00 for inspections for a total estimated projected cost of $92,800.00. Our share of the project would be $46,400.00, but it is possible that the cost estimates could change during the design, bidding, and construction processes. The funds for this project were to be taken from the capital outlay fund. Our share was originally estimated at $35,000.00. In all reality, the project would not be completed until early 1992, and we could budget for the additional funds in 1992. The final agreement is being drafted by the Wright County Assistant Engineer and is to be delivered with your agenda package or at the meeting. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The first alternative is to pass a resolution to enter into an agreement with Wright County for the construction of a traffic signal at the above -referenced intersection at an estimated city coat of $46,400.00, and to further authorize OSM to begin design work for the signal upon confirmation of the agreement by the City of Monticello and Wright County. The second alternative would be not to enter into an agreement with Wright County to construct the traffic signal. This does not appear to be in the boat interest of the city as we boon pursuing this signal for several years and its construction should not be dolayod. Council Agenda - 8/26/91 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council adopt a resolution to enter into an agreement with Wright County to construct a traffic signal at the above - referenced intersection as outlined in alternative $1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of leiter from OSM with proposal estimates; a copy of the proposed agreement from Wright County; a copy of the proposed resolution (to be presented at Monday meeting). A C% 2021 Fast Hennepin Avenue I Miru .ery+lis• MN 55413 612-33144 August 23, 1991 FAX 331.3806 Engineers AfChM= Planners Surveyors Mr. John Slmda City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 66362 Re: Traffic Signal in CSAH 39, CSAH 75 and Courtly Road 118 OSM Proposal No. 0305.01 Doan Mr. Uncle: This proposal follows our mcating of August 22. 1891 to discuss the coeperallve agreement project between the City of Monticello and Wright Courcy for the design and construction of a fug traffic actuated control system at the above referenced Intersection. The meeting was a restdi of the approval of the Signal Justitication Report by Mn/DOT. The estimated cost for preparation of pans and specifications for the traffic signal Is $8,800 and includes the fee currently charged for the Signal Justification Report of approxlrnaldy fie,800 and Is based on 11% of an estimated project oast of Sfi0 ODD. The cost for ow>sttiotion observation Is $4,000 based on a cost pus estimate. This results In a total osthato of 512,800 for dosign and oorstruction of the signal system at CSAR 75. CSAR 39 and County Road 118 in Monticello. We would appreciate a written acceptance of tNa estimate, along with a Notice to Proceed. Please give us a call If you have any questions regarding this estimate. Sincerely, O8 RR ASSOCIATES, IVC, Brat A. Wdso, P.E. O. Edward Amon LS. City Engineer Vice President BAW/DEA/omw 0B23com,js c: Ron Bray, OSM Rick Wdlatellar, City of MM110allo Dave Montebello, Wright county ptlG-23-91 GR 1 1 4 4 1 WR I GHT C T Y PWD P _ 02 x WRIGHT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS TRAYFIC SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 91-01 BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF WRIGHT. and THE CITY OF MONTICELLO FC Furnish and install a traffic signal system at the intersection of CSAR 75, CSAR 39 and CR 118 0 A LIG - 2 3- 9 1 FRI 14:41 W R I G H T C T Y P W B P.© 3 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the County of Wright, hereinafter referred to as the "County', and the City of Monticello, hereinafter referred to as the "City", WITNESSETH. WHEREAS, the State of Minneeota, Department of Transportation, in conjunction with Wright County Department of Highways have determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to install traffic control signals at the junction of cSAH 75, CSAR 39, and CR 118; AND WHEREAS, the County, and the City will share the cost of the maintenance, and operation of the new traffic control signals sa hereinafter net forth; AND WHEREAS, the City is initiating the project on behalf of the County, therefore the City will be responsible for administrating the project, which Includes, hiring a consultant to prepare the signal justification report, plane, specifications and proposal. Such work as described above will constitute "Engineering" and ba so referred hereinafter. The consultant will also perform the construction engineering and inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth. Such work as described above will constitute "Inspection" and be so referred to hereinafter. NOW, THEREFORE, IT 1S AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLR 1 The Contract cost of the work and/or, If the work or portions of work are not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, and equipment rental required to complate the work, except the coat of providing the power supply to the service poles or pada, *hall constitute the actual "Construction Cost" and be no referred hereinafter. AATICLR 2 The County and the City Shell share the Costa for this project as follows: CONSTRUCTION COSTS County - 501 of total cost (Approx. $40,000) City - 501 of total cost (Approx. $40,000) EhGINEERINt3 COSTS County • 501 of total consultant engineering cost (Approx. 13,200) City • 501 of total consultant engineering cost (Approx. $3,200) INSPECTION COSTS County • 301 of total consultant inspection coot (Approx. $3,200) City - 501 of total consultant Inspection cost (Approx. $3,200) The above breakdown is in agreement with the present County Traffic Signal Funding Policies. AMCLR 1 , It to agreed that upon completion and acceptance of the work as to quantity and quality by the City, the City Engineer shall determine the actual amount due the City from the County, according to Article 2, which amount upon approval by the County Engineer shall be final, binding and conclusive. The City •hall then apply for and receive payment from the County, due within 30 days after receipt of application for payment. S A IA V -z3-91 PRI 14 :42 W R I_" T C T Y ARTICLE 4 The City shall be responsible for providing the necessary electrical energy for the operation of the traffic control signals, and any electrical energy for street lights which are necessary. ARTICLE S Upon completion of the project; it shall be the City's responsibility at its cost and expense to (1) relamp the traffic control signals; and (2) clean and paint the traffic control signals and cabinets; and (3) provide electrical energy for the traffic control signals. The City shall also provide, at its cost and expense, for the maintenance on luminaries, and cleaning and painting the street light standards for the traffic signals. ARTICLE 6 Upon completion of the project; it shall be the County's responsibility at its cost and expense to (1) maintain the signal controller, (2) determine the appropriate signal timing sequence, (3) provide phone service to the controller for remake cervicing, (4) provide for replacement of poles, cabinet are. if they should be damaged through vehicle collision ate. (major maintenance). ARTICLE 7 Thu City shall indemnify, cave and hold harmless the County and all of its agents and employees of any form against any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of whatever nature or character arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the work provided for herein to be performed by the City. The County shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the City and all of its agents and employees of any form against any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of whatever nature or character arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the work provided for herein to be performed by the County. It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of the City and all other employees of the City engaged in the performance by any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall be considered employees of the City only and not of the County and that nay and all claims that may or might arise under Workman's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while aa, engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties to a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said City employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall be the sola obligation and responsibility of the City. AR'T'ICLE 8 before this agreement shall become binding and effective it shall be approved by resolution of the City Council of Monticello end it shall also be epp,oved by resolution of the County Board and such other officers as law may provide. �a 6 A LI G- 2 3 — 9 1 FRI 14 :42 WRIGHT C T Y P W H p. 0!5 CITY OF MONTICELLO APPROVED AS TO FORM: by City Attorney Mayor Dated (City Seal) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVALt by Public Work• Director City Administrator I COUNTY OF WRIGRT APPROVED AS TO FORM: by County Attorney County Board Chairperson Dated (County Seal) RMCOHMENDED FOR APPROVALt by County Highway Engineer County Auditor ATTBSTI Richard W. Norman County Coordinator 7 RESOLUTION 91 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AGREEMENT WITH WRIGHT COUNTY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF CSAH 75, CSAH 39, AND CH 118 WHEREAS, In response to traffic problems at said intersection the City of Monticello completed a signal justification study, and; WHEREAS, The State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, in conjunction with Wright County Department of Highways have determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to install traffic control signals at said intersection, and; WHEREAS, The Council of the City of Monticello has also determined that Installation of traffic control signals at the intersection is in the best interest of the City, and; WHEREAS, Minnesota Department of Transportation acceptance of the signal justification provides Wright County with Authorization to apply state aid funds toward financing one half of the cost to install of signals at the intersection; and WHEREAS, Wriqht County is willing to coordinate traffic signal Q installation and share in maintenance of signals at the Intersection, and; WHEREAS, The total cost of the project is estimated to be $92,0001 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 8Y THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, that the City of Monticello adopt an agreement with Wright County for construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of SCAN, 75, CSAH 39, and CH 118 which calls for City funding of one half ($46,400) of the cost to install traffic signals and requireR City participation in a portion of the cost to maintain the signals. The above resolution was introduced by Councilmombor , was duly seconded by Councilmomobor with the following voting in favor: Opposed: The City Administrator is hereby instructed to transmit a cortified copy of this resolution to the Wright County Engineer and to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Datod this 26th day of August, 1991. CCity Administrator Mayor 0 BRC FINANCIAL SV,STEM 07777/9, 14:03 i'48 Disbursement Journal WARPANI^ DATE- VENOOP DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM TNVOI GENERAL CHECKING 31949 07/70/9+ SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 193 CORRECT COOING 9.50 3,940 07/70/9, SIMCNSON LUMBER COMP 103 CORRECT CODINGB.SOCR• • 0.00 -CHECK TOTAL 31953 07/70/01 ONCON. INC. 551 SIOEVALK- PROJECT P 10.085.08 31856 07/70/91 ARNOLO/MARY 548 INFO CENTER SALARV 136.00 31954 07/70/01 ARNOLD/MARY $48 INFO, CENTER SALARV • 64.89CR 91.10 -CHECK TOTAL 31955 07/20/91 CELLULAR ONE 555 CIVIL DEFENSE PHOPSES 60.87 , 31956 07/20/91 HAVES/WILMA 265 CIVIL OEFE11Sf PHONES 101.15 31956 07/20/91 HAVES/VILMA 205 CIVIL DEFENSE PHONES 83.DOCR 170.75 •CHECK TOTAL 31057 07/20/01 COMMISSIONER OF SIEVE ., 37 2ND OTR NATER SALES T 830.88 31958 07/20/9, MN DEPART OF NATURAL ,116 WATERCRAFT/SNOWMOBILE 201.00 31950 07/20/91 BUSINESS EDUCATION S..00110 REG FEE/KAREN DOTV 155.00 31900 01/70/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 140 SLO PERMIT INFO 65.70 31060 07/70/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 140. DOG LICENSE INFO -- 85.70 31900 07/20/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 160 COMPOST SITE INFO 66.90 31000 07/20/01 MOr+TICELLO TIMES 140 SEALCOATING AD 76.40 3+900 07/20/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 140 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 1 +.030.56 31080 07/?0/0! MONTICELL2 TINES_,• - 140 GENERATOR BID/NAT-Fs 43.21 F 1+900 07/20/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 140 ASSESSMENT NOTICE 10.00 3'060 07/20/01 MONTICEL'LO TIMES 160 PLAN A ZONING H[ARINGS B4.Be,, - 1.333.45 •CNECV'TOTAL 1 31081, 07/70/91 COMMISSIONER OF TRAN,• 260 50 COUNTY MAPS 20.75 31987 07/73/91 AMERICAN ENGINEERING 379 SOIL 15OR11108/FALL ON 1.177.00• - 31607 07/73/01 AMERICAN ENGINEERING 379 SOIL BORINGS/BRIAR 1.122.00 31967 07/23/91 AMERICAN ENOINEERING 179 SOIL BORINGS/CARO ]N 1.172.09 1.106.75 *CHECK TOTAL 31903 07/21/91 BOSf/TOM 338 MILEAGE EIP(NSE 29.75 31986 07/71/01 BRADLEY A 09INE "550 LEGAL FEES/SHINGOW 117.00 31905 07/21/91 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO 31 AD FOR BIOS/FALLON AVE 71.00 - 31065 07/73/01 CHAPIN PUSLISMINO CO 31 AD POR BIOS/BRIAR (ST 71.00 31905 07/73/91 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO 11 'AO FOR BIOS/CARDINAL M 11.00 , ' 713.00 -CHECK TOFAL 0 0 cl c cl c, L c c c, cl cl cl cl 1 6 11 c , c c c c, cl, I I I 111 c Ic cl cl cl I cl cl cl c c 1, 6 R Cs F, INANCIAV� SVST6M cl ' 07/2i/9 1 -16-' 0 A� 9 5 b_U 8 9,.4, t J o u f. n a� I WARRANT - DATE DESCRIPTION 'AMOUNT- CLAIM, IN GENERAL, CHECK ING' cl 31966 07/23/91 ONCON, INC. 5511 SIDEWALK IMPROVEME 17,767.42' 31967 07/23/91 HIGH TECH ROOFING' 556 ROOF REPAIR/LIBRARY'6.I0D.W 31960 07/23/91 P40LIOAY CREDIT OePiC 05 GAS/FIRE DEPT 73.34 31960.07/29%01 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA 08 REG FEE/SCHOOL/RICK W 35.00 • 31970 07/23/91 MANKATO BUSINESS PRO 522 COPY MACHINE MTC/FIRE 355-.51 31071 07/23/91 MIDWEST VISION OTSTR ;279 SAFETY GLASSES 108.00 31971 07/23/91 MIDWEST VISION OISTR 279 SAFETY GLASSES/PW IUSP 33.00 110110111111: MIDWEST, VISION IIIR 2710 S.%�Tl..LASIE.IWATER 0 10:DO Is71 31971 07/73/91 t. I OWEST VISION 01rTR 29 SAFE TV.GLAS. E,/sew ER C 70.00 10 7 1 3107107/23/91 07/2)/Ol MIDWEST VISION DISTQ 279 SAFETY GLASSES/PARKS 0 85.60 31971 07/23/91 MIDWEST VISION OISTR 776 SAFETY GLASSES/STREETS 90.40. 630.90 SCHECK TOTAL 11 972 07/23/91 flOb I L lgl:GAS/BLO INSPECTIONS 13.90 31072 07/23/,:11 MOBIL 131 GAS/WATER DEPT 21.00 31972 'Q72 07/ 2, f MOBIL III GAS/SEWER COIL 27.00 11072 07/23/01 MOBIL 1�11 GAS/STREET DEPT 08.55 154.65 *CHECK TOTAL 31973 07/23/01 NORTHERN STATES 'POWE 14.8 STREET SITE INSTALL 1.104.58 31076 07/25/91 PHILLIPS 00 COMPANY 107tCAS/WATER DEPT .7.0e _11:74_01/23/0,1 PKILL10,9- W COMPANY 107 GAS/SEWER COLLECTIONS, 7.07, 16.15 -CHECK TOT/ C) 31075 07123101 PITNEY BOWES 1 180 POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL 72.00 Q, 11970 07/73/91 PRINSCO INC: 557 Pipes. ETC/STREETS Ir -091 'GENERAL CHECKING TOTAL 61.721.23 0 16 c BRC? FINANCIAL, SYSTEM OB70B/B 1, tSt93t33 ° '' 01e0ureement Jou'rnel O WARRANT DATE VENDOR i DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM, IINVO it GENERAL CNECKING 31976„07/31/BI PRINSCO INCA - 557 CMECK+VOIOED/REISSU 1.09,1.626R • 31977 07/31/91 PRINSCO INC, SSS) PIPES. ETC/STREETS 1.029.66 31978 07/31/91 MN DEPART, OF NATURAL 118 WATER/SNOV/ATV,REPORT 226.00 - 31078 07/31/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 116 WATERCRAFT TITLES 88.00 31960 07/31/01 SHEARSON LEHMAN BROT 559 CD BOSTON SAVINGS 85.300.00 31061 07/31/91 CONDOM-SKELLV ANTIOU 380 INS PREM/ANTIQUE FIRE 66./S' • 31982 07/31/91 JESSE SCHERR .90169 RECYCLING PRIZE 50.00 31983 07/31/91 CHARLOTTE ADAMS .90166 RECYCLING PRIZE 50.00 31986 07/31/91 MONTICELLO ANIMAL•CD 185 'ANIMAL CONTRACT/ADOPT 605.00 31086 07/31/01 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 198 MISC SUPPLIES/ANIMAL 68.00 653.08 •CHECK TOTAL 31085 07/31/91 ADOPT -A -PET s� ADOPTIONS 871.00 31986 07/31/91 VIC HELLMAN 1•.90160••RECYCLING PRIZE 50.00 31967 07/31/91 DR. CHARLES FISH .80136 REIMB/BILLED TWICE/TR IIS.00 31986 07/31 /91 NORTHWEST MINNESOTA -' 190 CONFERENCE REO/GARY A 10.00 - 31909, 01/9l/:I AN0-US14ITAL�DEVELOo_C F _'60,0R0110TIONAI. VIDEO __2.000.00_ 31800 07/31/01 MN DEPART OF NATURAL ; -'118-WATERCRAFT TITLE REPOR 37.00 31091 07/31/91 MN OEPART OF NATURAL 118. WATERCRAFT/SNOW REG 230.00 .P08TAOE/WATER 31982 01/31/:1 U.B. POSTMASTER 210 BILLING 165.13 ° 31082 07/81/01 U.8. POSTMASTER 210 POSTAGE/WATER BILLING 185.12 -� '• 330.20 -CHECK TOTAL. GENERAL CNECKING _ TOTAL 00.062.30 , 16 c 1 - BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM `- OB/O9/O1 10:55754 Disbursement Journal WARRANT OATE ` VENDOR DESCRIPTION A14OUNT CLAIM INV" GENERAL CHECKING `- 30273 08/10/91 UNOCAL 213 CHECK VOIOEO/9/15/90 53.52CR 30273 08/10/91 UNOCAL 243 CHECK VOIDED/8/15/90 8.76CR 30273 06/10/91 UNOCAL 213 CHECK VOIDED/8/15/90 0.75CR 71.03CR -CHECK TOTAL 31993 06/10/91 HAYES/WILMA 265 INFO CENTER SALARY ' 189.13 ' 31093 08/10/01 HAYES/WILMA 295 INFO CEIITER SALARY 62.30CR 126.83 *CHECK TOTAL 31004 00/10/91 ARNOLD/MARY 548 INFO CENTER SALARY 170.00 31994 06/10/91 ARNOLO/MARY $48 INFO CENTER SALARY SO.000R 114.00 -CHECK TOTAL 31095 06/10/01 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAFT/SNOW REG 215.00 31990 00/10/91 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 3 PEST CONTROL/CITY HALL 52.50 31007 08/10/01 ANDERSON S ASSOCIATE -10 PAINT/STREET DEPT 244.00 , 31997 06/10/91 ANDERSON 8 ASSOCIATE 10 SWING HOOKS/PARKS 10.77 254.77 •CHECK TOTAL 31998 06/10/91 ANNANOALE VETERINARY 302 VET FEES/ANIMAL CONTR 119.50 31099 06/10/91 ARA CORY REFRESHMENT 408 SUPPLIES/CITY HAIL 60.00 32000 06/10/91 AUTO-OWNERS INSURANC 363 PROPERTY INS/RENTAL 193.00 ' - 32001 06/10/91 6RENTESON CONSTRUCTI 415 CLASS V/STREETS 306.66 32002 08/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELCPHON 26 TELEPHONE CHARGES 567.60 32002 06/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEP140M 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 03.16 ' 32002 09/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 26 TELEPHONE CHARGES 69.10 32002 00/10/01 BRIDGEVATER TELEPHON 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 11.47 32002 00/10/01 BRIDGEWATER TELEPMON 26 TELEPHONE CHARGES 70.07 32002 00/10/01 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 26 TELEPHONE CHARGES 01.63 32002 00/10/91 BRIOGEWATCR TELEPHON 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 20.00 32002 00/10/01 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 13.50 32002 06/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELCPMON 74 TELEPHONE CHARGES 00.07 32002 08/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELCPMON 24 TELEPHONE CMARG91 70.00 12007 08/10/01 SRIOGCWATER TCICPMON 26 TELEPHONE CHARGES 10.26 32002 09/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 26•TELEPHONE CHARGES 36.30 32002 06/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 26 TELEPHONE CHARGES 10.00 32002 00/10/91 BRIOnEWATER TELEPMON I4 TELEPHONE CHARGES 17.90 32002 06/10/01 BRIDGEWATER TCLEPMON 26 TELEPHONE CHARGES 71.30 1,111,60 6CHECK TOTAL 32003 00/10/01 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS. 25 STREET MATERIAL 002.21 1 , I BFC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 00/08/81 10i55tS4 'WARRANT, DATE ' VENDOR "GENERAL CHECKING 32004 08/10/01 COPY OUPLCATIUG PROD 32005 08/10/01 DUERR'S WATER CARE S 32006 08/10/91 EMERGENCY APPARATUS 32007 00/10/01 FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER 32000 08/10/91 FEEDRITE CONTROLS. I 32000 08/10/91 FEEDRITE CONTROLS. I 32009 09/10/91 FIRST TRUST NATIONAL 32010 08/10/91 FOREST CITY ROAD LAN 32011 09/10/01 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE 32012 09/10/91 GRIEFNOW SHEET METAL 3201) 09/10/91 HERMES/JERRY 32016 00/10/91 HOGLUND COACH LINES 32015 00/10/01 J M OIL COMPANY 32010 09/10/91 LUKACH/JOHN 32010 09/10/01 LUKACH/JOHN 32018 00/10/91 LUKACH/JOHN 32016 00/10/01 LUKACH/JOM11 32011 00/10/01 MIOWEST GAS COMPANY 32017 00/10/91 MIOWEST GAS COMPANY 32017 00/10/01 MIDWEST GAO COMPANY 32017 00/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 32011 09/10/91 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 32017 00/10/91 MIDWEST OAS COMPANY 32017 00/10/91 MIDWEST OAS COMPANY 12017 00/10/91 MIDWEST OAS COMPANY 32018 0e/10/01 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 320.10 08/10/01 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 32018 00/10/91 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 32010 06/10/01 NORTHERN STATES POWE S20tO 00/10/01 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32019 00/10/01 NORTHERN STATES POWI Disbursement Journal OESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOI Al CORY MACHINE MTC/LIBRA 45.00 60 WATER CARE/WWTP RENTAL 14.28 680 VEH EQUIP REPAIRS/F 8.365.82 55 TREE REPLACEMENTS 120.32 50 PROF SERVICES/WATER Of $6.00 SB CHLORINE/WATER DEPT 2.334.35 2.370.3S 604 FIRE HALL BOND PAYMEN 652.20 563 LANDFILL CMO/GARBAG 0.370.20 64 BLADES/STREET DEPT 69.15 73 REPAIRS/WATER DEPT 232.00 e1 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.80 693 BUS TRANS CONTRACT 6.650.63 05 GAS/FIRE DEPT 10.26 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 62.00 127 MILEAGE EXPENSE 20.01 127 MILEAGE EXPENSE 20.93 127 MILEAGE EXPENSE 20.04 179.00 I1S UTILITIES 11.10 110 UTILITIES 3.10 115 UTILITIES 6.01 115 UTILITIES 19.51 115 UTILITIES 8.06 115 UTILITIES 6.66 118 UTILITIES 1.00 115 UTILITIES 11,42 00.11 185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRA 500.00 185 MILEAGE EXPENSE 20.00 105 MISC SUPPLIES/ANIMAL C 11.26 531.25 160 UTILITIES 3.200.07 149 UTILITIES 106.10 166 UTILITIES 3.672.00 -CHECK TOTAL $CHECK .TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL BRCFINANCIAL SYSTEM 00/00/91 10:55:54 Disbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENOOR 'DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM 1NVIj GENERAL CHECKING 32010 08/10/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 140 UTILITIES 65.59 32019 06/10/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 148 UTILITIES 666.50 32019 00/10/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 160 UTILITIES 63.36 32010 08/10/01 NORTHERN STATES POWE 149 UTILITIES 236.77 32019 08/10/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 140 UTILITIES 12.80 32019 08/10/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 148 UTILITIES 261.40 32019 08/10/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 160 UTILITIES 268.82 32019 08/10/01 NORTHERN STATES POWE 160 UTILITIES 583.89 32019 00/10/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 160 UTILITIES 1.000.67 10.202.56 -CHECK TOTAL 32020 00/10/91 NORWEST INVESTMENT S 155 COMPUTER PAYMENT 2.407.61 32021 08/10/91 POLKA DOT RECYCLING 170 RECYCLING CONTRACT 1.755.67 32022 00/10/91 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 175 VWTP CONTRACT PAY14 28.687.50 32023 OB/10/01 RADISSON HOTEL CENTE 178 TRAVEL EKPEHSE/COUNCI 280.70 32024 00/10/91 RELIABLE CORPORATION 179 DISKETTES/COMPUTER 30.79 32025 OB/10/91 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 106 MTC OF EQUIPMENT/SHOP 50.50 32020 00/10/91 SENTRY SYSTEMS 1Se ALARM. SYSTEM/FIRE DEP 120.00 32027 06/10/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 103 SUPPLIES/DARK DEPT 37.11 32027 00/10/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 193 PARK IMPROVEMENTS 1.130.38 ' 1.175.61 *CHECK TOTAL 32029 09/10/91 TEAM LABORATORY CHEM 931 SUPPLIES/STREET DEPT 177.19 32029 09/10/91 THE COBS GROUP 882 SUBSCRIPTION/COMPUTER 39.00 92030 00/10/91 UNOCAL 211 GAS/FIRE DEPT 8.76 32030 08/10/91 UNOCAL 211 OAS/WATER DEPT 11.21 ' 10.99 *CHECK TOTAL 32031 08/10/01 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA 826 GARBAGE CONTRACT 1.071.17 32031 09/10/01 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA 576 BALES TAS/OARSAGE CON 011.63 0.162.80 *CHECK TOTAL 37032 06/10/81 WATER PRODUCTS COMPA 710 WATER METER PARTS 053.35 3203) 06/10/01 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP $12 UTILITIES 9.25 GENERAL CHECKINO TOTAL 60.061.02 SRC FINANCIAL SVSTE+• 08/20/9+ 10:4+:03 D1eDUryement Journal WAPP,ANT DATE VEr.D,)P DESCRIPTION AI/.OUNT CLAIM INVOI C- GENERAL CHECKING ' 320+7 D3/ GPIEFIKOW SHEET METAL 73 CORRECT COOOING 732.00CR 32012 19/9 08/+9/9+ GBlEFNOW SHEET METAL 73 CORRECT CODDING 737.00 0.00 'CHECK TOTAL 32027OB/19/91 S1MONS ON LUMBER COMP 193 ADJUST COOING 120.80 32077 OB/+9/Bt SlMORSON LUMBER COMP'" 193 ADJUST COOIItG 11.16 32027 08/19/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 193 CODING 731.98CR _ADJUST 0.00 'CHECK TOTAL ' 32034 08/19/91 JOHN MORRIS .00153 REFUND/SEVER A WATER PM 2.67 32035 08/19/91 AME READY MIX 8 IMPROVEMENTS/PARKS 322.57 32038 OB/10/91 BARTOm SAND b GROVEL 305 MISC SUPPLIES/STREETS. 88.77 37030 08/+9/91 BAR TON SAND A GRAVEL 305 MISC DUMPING/STREETS 50.00 32036 09/19/91 BARTON SAND A GRAVEL 305 DUMPING/SIDEWALK PROJE 15.00 151.72 -CHECK TOTAL 32037 OB/19/91 UN I TO REN TOL SERv[C. ttt UNIFORM RENTAL 0.73 32031 OB/t9/9t UNI TOG PEI�TAL BE PV3C 211 UNIFORM RENT LL 8.77 32037 08/19/91 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC 211 UNIFORM RENTAL 16.00 32037 08/19/91 UN[TOG RENTAL SERVIC 211 UNIFORM RENTAL +6.00 32037 OB/+9/91 UN I TOG RENTAL SERVIC 21+ UllFORM RENTAL 67.87 37037 08/19/91 ONITOG RENTAL SERVIC 711 UNIFORM RENTAL 07.81 184.08 -CHECK TOTAL 32038 08/19/01 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF. 174 INSURANCE PREMIUM 40.08 37039 08/19/91 GREG ROOEN .10155 FEC':CLII7C. PR17E 50.00 ' 37040 DO/ 10/01 CITY OF MO7+TICELLO .00155 SEVER/WATER BILL/BANVA 74•.26 32041 00/19/91 TERPI SANVAI .90151 REFUND/OAMAGE DEP/BAN 125.74 , 32042 08/19/01 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 116 WATERCRAFT/SNOW/ATV R 243.00 32043 Obi 19/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAFT TITLE 00.00 32044 DO/ 10/0, ONCON. INC. 351 SIDEWALK PRJ/FINAL 4.604.34 32045 DO/ 19/91 MONTICELLO TOWNSHIP 390 ANNEKATION AGRMT P 13.750.00 32046 OB/10/Ot ACNOL D/MARY St.6 INFOT CENTER SALARY 136.00 32040 08/19/91 ARNOLO/MARY SAO INFO CENTER SALARY 44,6OCR 01.70 •CHECK TOTAL 37047 09/+9/91 HAVES/WILMA 205 11,10 CENTl SALARY 700.13 37041 OB/t9/0+ HAYS S/WILMA 785 INFO CENTER 3ALARV 67.00CR 130.73 .r HECK TQTAL C r •.1 BRC FINAIJCIAL SYSTEM 08/20/01 10:61:03 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 32046 08/19/91 CELLULAR ONE 32048 08/22/91 A T B T INFO SYSTEMS 32050 00/22/91 AEC ENGINEERS 8 OESI 32051 08/22/01 AMERI DATA 32052 08/22/91 AMVET 32053 00/22/01 BEN FRANKLIN 32053 09/22/91 8EN FRANKLIN 32054 O8/22/91 6ICFs. INC. 32055 00/22/01 BOARD 6 ADMINISTRATO 32050 00/22/91 BOSE/TOM 32057 00/22/01 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS. 32058 00/22/91 BURLINGTON NORTHERN 32050 09/22/01 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 32059 00/27/91 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 32050 08/22/01 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 32060 09/22/01 COAST TO COAST 32060 06/22/01 COAST TO COAST 32060 09/22/01 COAST TO COAST 32000 06/27/91 COAST TO COAST 32000 00/27/01 COAST TO COAST 32060 00/22/01 COAST TO COAST 32080 00/27/01 COAST TO COAST 32060 08/77/61 COAST TO COAST 32060 08/22/01 COAST TO COAST 37060 00/22/91 COAST TO COAST 32060 09/22/01 COAST TO COAST 37000 06/77/61 COAST TO COAST 32060 00/27/01 COAST TO COAST 32050 06/27/61 COAST TO COAST 32050 06/72/01 COAST TO COAST 32060 06/27/91 COAST TO COAST 32060 01/22/01 COAST TO COAST 37000 06/27/01 COAST TO COAST Dlsbursemant Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 555 PHONE CHARGES/CIVIL OE 54.03 15 FIRE PHONE CHARGES 4.04 656 PROF SRV/WATER TANK 762.00 9 TONER CARTRIDGE/COMPU 336.00 504 ANIMAL CONTROL/VET FEE 70.00 20 SCANNERS/MAIL SERVICE 9.00 20 FILM/MUSEUM 19.98 20.e7 395 LATRINE RENTAL/PARKS 70.00 3S4 NEWSLETTER SUB/COUNCIL 00.10 330 MILEAGE EXPENSE 30.75 25 STREET MTC MATERIAL 77.85 337 PROF SERVICES/WATER 0 100.00 26 PRO: SERVICES/AROPL AX 637.50 20 PROF SERVICES/SHING 2.350.00 28 PROF SERVICES/ECON 1.662.50 41030.00 35 MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS 128.20 38 MISC SUPPLIES/LIBRARY 10.56 18 CLEANING SUP/LISRARV 10.60 35.EOUIP REPAIR PARTS/PARK 0.59 15 BLO REPAIR SUP/DARKS 62.04 35 CLOTHING SUP/PARRS 6.08 35 MISC SUPPLIES/STREETS 70.16 35 MISC SUPPLIeS/FIRE OEP 50.77 35 STREET MTC MATERIALS 33.67 35 SMALL TOOLS/TREE OePT 13.49 SS MISC SUPPLIES/ANIMAL 65.21 35 MISC SUPPLIES/WATER 5.18 38 MISC SUP/PV INSPECTION 26.60 35 SMALL TOOLS/STREETS 22.17 3S MISC SUP/SHOP 6 GAR 15.45 16 WEN PARTS/STREET! 3.96 15 SMALL TOOLS/PARKS 23.11 38 SMALL TOOLS/SHOP 9 OAR 33.46 823.90 CLAIM IN+� •CHECK TOTAL •CHECK TOTAL •CHECK TOTAL BRC FINAUCIAL SYSTEM. , 08/20/01 10:41:03OFIOur6emh nt Journal yq- WARRANT OATE VENOOR ' DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVO1 GENERAL CHECKING `- 32081 00/72/9 1 COPY EOUIPMENT. INC. 468 MISC SUPPLIES/PW INSPE 89.82 32062 00/22/0 1 ELK RIVER CONCRETE o 581 MANHOLE/STREET DEPT 297.97 32003 06/22/9 1 (NNIS CABINETS/JIM 5h FILE CABINET/CITV MAL 771.00 , ' 32064 00/22/0 1 FULL CONCRETE PRODUC 314 STREET SUPPLIES 72.20 32065 01/22/9 1 FAST PHOTE IMAGE CEN .90152 MISC SUPPLIES/CITV.HAL 13.00 32086 06/22/9 1 FLICKER'S T.V. A APP 80 TAPES/COUNCIL MEETING 100.56 32067 00/22/9 1 FRANCIS OUBAY .9015) RECYCLING PRIZE 75.00 32068 01/22/9 1 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE 510 STRAINER/VALVE/FIRE D 557.15 32080 01/22/9 1 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE 510 CLOTHING SUPPLIES/FIRE 53.40 810.55 -CHECK TOTAL 32009 00/22/9 1 GARTNER'S OFFICE PRO 377 OFFICE SUPPLIES/C HAL 101.15 32070 00/22/0 1 GOPHER STATE OHE CAL 09 PROF SERVICES/WATER D 175.00 32071 01/72/9 1 HARRV'S AUTO SUPPLY 78 EOUIP REPAIR PARTS/STR 30.08 32011 01/22/0 1 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 79 BATTERIES/STREETS 209.33 32071 01127/9 1 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 76 SMALL TOOLS/SHOP 6 GAR 0.50 32071 01/22/0 1 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 78 YEN REPAIR PARTS/PARK 100.95 32071 04/77/9 1 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 78 MISC SUPPLIES/WATER OEP 1.90 , 32011 01/27/0 1 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 76 MTC SUPPLIES/WATER DEPT 6.07 320)1 00/27/9 1 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 70 MISC SUPPLIES/FIRE OIPT 5.00 / h06.53 -CHECK TOTAL 32072 08/22/9 1 HERMES/JERRY 81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 277.50 32011 01/22/0 1 INDUSTRIAL MAINT. SU $14 MISC SUPPLIES/SHOP A G 27.69 32074 01/77/9 1 J M OIL COMPANY 95 LUBRICANTS/FIRE DEPT 23.70 32075 01/22/0 1 EOROPCHAK/OLIVE 01 TRAVEL EXPENSE 33.00 32070 01/22/0 1 KOVICH/PATRICA 287 MILEAGE EXPENSE 1.50 32076 01/22/01 KOVICM/PATRICA ' 287 MILEAGE EXPENSE 5.00 0.50 #CHECK TOTAL 32017 01/22/01 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA 08 MEMBERSHIP DUES/COU 2.050.00 32078 01122/01 LITTLE MOUNTAIN FLOW 680 MISC SUPPLIES/CITV MAL Ih.15 32071 01/22/91 LOCH JEWELERS 885 APPRECIATION PLAOUE/NS 81.00 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 08/20/91 10:41:03 ` WARRANT DATE VEN00R GENERAL CHECKING 32080 08/22/91 LOTUS OEVEOPMEUT COR 32081 08/22/91 MACOUEEN EQUIPMENT I 32002 08/22/91 MARCO BUSINESS PROOU 32083 08/22/91 MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC 32084 08/22/91 MAUS FOODS 32084 08/22/91 MAUS FOODS 32004 08/22/91 HAUS FOODS 32084 08/22/01 MAUS FOODS 32085 00/22/91 MCOOWALL COMPANY 32000 09/22/91 MIDWAY INOUSTQIAL SU 32000 00/22/91 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SU 32006 00/22/91 MIDWAY INOUSTRIAL SU 32007 00/22/91 MOBIL 32097 09/22/01 MOBIL 32007 06/72/41 MOBIL 32087 09/22/01 MOBIL 32000 00/22/01 MONTICELLO OFFICE OR 37069 00/22/91 MONTICELLO ROTARY 32000 00/22/01 MONTICELLO TIMES 32090 06/22/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 32000 00/22/01 MONTICELLO TIMES 32090 00/22/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 32000 08/22/01 MONTICELLO TIMES 32000 09/27/01 MONTICELLO TIMES _ 32000 09/22/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 32090 01/72/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 32000 08/22/01 MONTICELLO TIMES 32090 00/22/91 14ONTICILLO TIMES 32000 01/22/01 MONTICELLO TIMES 12000 06/22/9, MONTICELLO TIMES 32091 00/77/91 MONTICELLO VACUUM CE 32002 01/22/91 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN 32012 09/22/91 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN 32002 08/22/01 MOOR MOTOR SALES. IM Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM IN• 560 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/C M 120.00 104 VEHICLE NTC PARTS/$TREE 0.27 100 TYPEWRITER RIBBONS 32.52 107 LAWN SEED/PARKS 50.50 100 SHOP 0 GARAGE SUPPLIES 34.38 108 CLEANING SUPP/AMINAL 23.06 108 LIBRARY CLEANING SUPP 8.28 100 CITY MALL SUPPLIES 18.55 84.27 -CHECK TOTAL 111 REPAIR OUCTWORK/Lt$ 2.042.50 116 MTC OF EOUIPMENT/STRE 113.90 114 MTC OF EOUIP/STREETS 113.06 114 MISC STREET SUPPLIES 88.69 206.61 *CHECK TOTAL 131 OAS/6LO INSPECTIONS 01.73 131 GAS/WATER DEPT 83.84 131 GA6/6EWER DEPT 03.04 131 GAS/STREET DEPT 179.12 357.53 VCHECK TOTAL 136 OFFICE SUPPLIES/C NAL 893.21 130 OUE$/OLLIE KOROPCHAK 180.00 140 ANNUAL FINANCE REPORT 402.94 140 OLD PERMIT INFORMATION 05.70 140 000 LICENSE INFORMATIO 32.60 140 COMPOST SITE INFORMATI 53.03 140 NSP SECTION AD 761.60 160 LEGAL PROCEEOINGS 569.70 140 PUBLIC NEARING NOTICES $6.30 140 L16RARY INFORMATION 41.40 140 LEGAL NOTICES/BRIAR OA 40.37 140 LEGAL NOTICES/CARDINAL 17.91 140 LEGAL NOTICES/FALLON 101.00 140 LEGAL NOTICES/1HtNGOBE 07.10 1.061.31 -CHECK TOTAL 141 SELTS.OAOS.ETC/LIORARY 32.13 142 TRIMMER/PARKS DEPT 300.05 142 EODUP REPAIR PARTS/TR 401.02 142 LUSRtCANTS/PARKS DEPT 0.04 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 00/20/01 10:41:03 �- WARRANT DATE VENDOR - GENERAL CHECKING 32092 09/22/91 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN 32093 03/22/91 MOORES EXCAVATING _ 32006 09/22/71 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 3209h 09/22/91 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 32095 09/22/91 NELSON/AL A JULIE 32008 08/22/01 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS 32097 09/22/91 OLSON. USSET.AGAN A 32097 00/22/91 OLSON. USSET.AGAN A 32088 00/22/01 OMANN BROTHERS. INC. 32099 00/22/91 ORR-SCMELEN-MAYERON 32089 08/22/01 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 32099 00/27/91 ORR-SC14E L EN-MAYE RON 32100 08/22/91 PREUSSE'S CLEANING 0 32100 OB/22/01 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S 32101 08/22/01 Pat7+sco INC 37-102 08/22/91 RELIABLE CORPORATION 32102 09/22/01 RELIABLE CORPORATION 32103 01/22/01 RIVERSIDE OIL 32104 04/22/91 ROYAL TIRE OF 14ONTIC 32105 01/22/01 3CHARGER A $ON$. INC 37108 00/22/01 SCHILLEWAERT LAND$CA 32107 09/22/01 $HUMAN/CATHY 32101 01/27/$1 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPOR 32100 09/22/91 SPECTRUM SANITARY SU O1sDursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVQ. 142 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/PARK 3.25 723.73 -CHECK TOTAL 253 PROF SERv ICES/STREETS 952.50 144 VAC ALL PARTS 00.31 166 FIRE DEPT SUPPLIES 15.90 103.71 -CHECK TOTAL 165 NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION 77.19 550 MISC PROF/PLAN A 20 1.125.00 292 PROF SER/BRIAR ESTATES 75.00 202 MISC PROF SERVICES 607.50 572.50 -CHECK TOTAL 334 STREET MTCE MATERIAL 232.85 102 MISC ENGINEERING FE 2.835.13 132 CTY 30/HW Y75 IMPROV 1.038.20 102 SCHOOL BL VO/02110 AVE 003.75 5.397.00 -CHECK TOTAL m, FIRE HALL CLEANING CON 50.00 173 CITY HALL CLEANINO CO 400.00 650.00 -CHECK TOTAL $67 MISC STREET SUPPLIES 175.17 170 LIFT OFF TAOES/CITY MA 63.27 170 COMPUTER CABLES/C HALL 35.04 Ih.21 -CHECK TOTAL 406 GAS/STREET DEPT 2.009.57 221 TIRE REPAIR/PARKS 0.00 220 MISC REPAIRS/PARKS 93.'0 392 PROF $ERV/TREE RENO 3.050.00 191 MILEAGE EIPENSE/$EMENA 24.25 1s$ SMALL TOOLI/SHOP 1 GA 170.06 609 MISC $UPPLIES/PARK$ OE $0.00 8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 08/20/0, 10:61:03 WARRANT DATE VEt100R GENERAL CHECKING 32110 08/72/91 ST.CL000 FIRE EOUIOM 32110 39/22/01 ST.CL000 FIRE EOUIOM 32110 08/22/91 ST.CL000 FIRE EOUI6M 32110 09/22/01 ST.CLOUD FIRE EOUIRM 32110 08/72/91 ST.CL000 FIRE EOUIRM 32111 09/22/91 TAYLOR LAND SURVEYOR 321 t2 08/22/01 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 32113 08/22/91 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAo0 32,16 00/22/01 2ACK'S IND. CLEANING GENERAL CHECKING Disbursement Journal OESCRI6TION AMOUNT 762 SERV FIRE EXTINO/C HAL 25.26 262 SERV FIRE EKTIPINLIBRA 25.20 262 SERV FIRE EXTINO/FIRE 65.30 262 MISC SUPPLIES/FIRE DED 31.00 262 SERV FIRE EKTINO/WATER 15.12 167.92 203 SURVEY FEES/FALLON AV 130.00 219 AUG SHERIFF'S CONT 16.330.05 226 AUGUST CONTRACT DAYME 875.00 312 SMALL•TOOLS/STREET DE 125.20 . TOTAL 71.010.76 0 CLAIM INvf ) •CHECK TOTAL BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM `- 00/00/01 15151:29 Disbursement Journal WARRANT OATE VENOOR OESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVO: �- LIOUOR LUNO ' 15544 07/19/91 OLSON 6 SONS ELECTRI 000030 CN VOIDED 255.0008 15780 01/19/91 GRIGGS. COOPER 6 COM 000010 LIQUOR PURCHASE 2.330.46 JUNE 15707 07/19/91 OUALITV VINE 6 SPIRI 000040 LIQUOR PURCHASE 602.03 JUNE 15700 07/10/01 STAR SIGNS 600100 SIGN FOR LIQUOR STORE 20.00 JULY 15769 01/19/91 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 600022 LIQUOR PURCHASE 1.138.75 JULY 15790 07/19/91 PHILLIPS 8 SONS CO/E 000037 MISC PURCHASES 62.05 15790 07/19/91 PHILLIPS 8 SONS CO/E 800031 WIVE PURCHASE 574.53 • 617.40 -CHECK TOTAL 15791 07/10/91 U S WEST COMMUNICA77 000093 ADVERTISING 21.80 JUNE 15792 07/10/91 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 000012 WINE PURCHASE 706.70 15797 07/19/91 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 000017 MISC PURCHASES 60.29 057.07 •CHECK TOTAL 15703 07/19/91 GRIGGS. COOPER 8 COM 000010 LIQUOR PURCHASE 6.002.a3 15794 07/19/91 WRIGHT WAY SHOPPER 600106 ADVERTISING 500.00 JUNE 15795 01/10/91 COAST TO COAST 600006 REDECORATING LIQUOR S 322.40 JUNE IS79S 07/19/01 COAST TO COAST 000006 CORRECT CODING 10.49CR JUNE 15705 07/19/91 COAST TO COAST 000006 CORRECT CODING 16.36CR JUNE 207.66 -CHECK TOTAL 15706 01/10/01 14COOWALL COMPANY 000065 AIR CONDITIONER REPAI 260.21 JUNE 15791 07/10/01 FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER 000071 REPLACE SHRUBS 66.26 JUNE 15709 01/19/91 LIEFERT TRUCKING 800025 FREIGHT CHARGES 511.03 JUNE 10709 07/1//01 ORUYS. JOHNSON 8 ASB 800020 1000 FINANCIAL AUDI 1.000.00 15000 07/1t/91 HAMILTON/BARBARA 800088 REDECORATING LIQUOR 1.090.00 JUNE 15001 01/10/91 JOHNSON SROs WHOMA 000022 VINE PURCHASE 299.14 15002 01/I0/01 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 000101 VINE PURCHASE 196.60 JUNE 15003 07/18/91 GRIGGS. COOPER A COM 000019 LIQUOR PURCHASE 1.011.08 15806 01/11/81 PHILLIPS 8 SONS CO/E 000017 WINE PURCHASE 64.61 15804 01/10/01 PHILLIPS A SONS CO/E 900017 LIQUOR PURCHASE 7.017.51 2.042.64 -CHECK TOTAL 1 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/00/91 15:51:29 Ofsbursomsnt Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM IN" L LIQUOR FUND 15905 07/19/91 QUALITY WINE A SPIRI 900060 LIQUOR PURCHASE 922.60 15805 07/19/91 QUALITY WINE A SPIRI 600060 WINE PURCHASE 1.929.75 15805 07/19/91 QUALITY WINE 6 SPIRI 600040 MISC PURCHASES 19.09 2.771.43 •CHECK TOTAI 15609 07/19/91 MN MUNICIPAL BEVERAG BO0079 MEMBERSHIP DUES 350.00 15807 07/10/91 JOHNSON GROS WHOLESA 800022 LIQUOR PURCHASE 705.60 15807 07/19/91 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 900022 VINE PURCHASE 717.64 1.423.33 •CHECK TOTAL 15908 07/19/91 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE 800053 PURCHASE C.0 60.000.00 15909 07/19/91 SERVICE SALES CORPOR 600042 BON CU7TERS/SUPPLIES 22.45 15810 07/19/91 NCR CORPORATION 600034 MTC OF CASH REGISTER 75.00 15811 07/19/91 PHILLIPS A SONS CO/E 900037 VINE PURCHASE 623.51 ' 18811 07/19/01 PHILLIPS A SONS CO/E 600037 LIQUOR PURCHASE 304.99 1.020.20 •CHECK TOTAL 15912 07/19/91 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE 600109 EQUIP RENTAL/REOECORAT 99.51 13813 07/19/91 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 600012 WINE PURCHASE 13.33 15913 07/19/91 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 MIX PURCHASE 270.34 16913 07/19/91 EAGLE VINE COMPANY 800012 BEER PURCHASE 19.40 303.07 •CHECK TOTAL 15814 07/19/91 GRIGGS. COOPER A COM 800018 LIQUOR PURCHASE 2.551.85 15815 07/19/91 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 800054 MISC SUPPLIES 23.40 16918 07/10/91 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 900064 LIQUOR PURCHASE 3.323.35 LIQUOR FUND TOTAL 64.396.71 1 3 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM . L 09/09/91 10:56:31 Disbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR OESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVO: LIQUOR FUND �— 15017 08/09/91 PHILLIPS S SONS CO/E 000037 LIQUOR PURCHASE 1.993.05 15017 09/09/01 PHILLIPS A SONS CO/E 000037 MINE PURCHASE 26.81 ' 7.018.60 •CHECK TOTAL 15016 08/09/01 EAGLE VINE COMPANY 800012 MISC SUPPLIES FOR RESA 23.70 15018 09/09/91 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 000012 VINE PURCHASE 1.230.23 1.253.93 •CHECK TOTAL 15019.00/09/91 QUALITY WINE 6 SPIRI 000060 LIQUOR PURCHASE 6.920.53 15020 00/00/91 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 000022 VINE PURCHASE 3.167.10 15021 00/10/91 SERNICK'S.PEPSI COLA 600001 POP PURCHASE 308.80 15022 00/10/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPMON 000002 TELEPHONE CHARGES 80.50 15023 08/10/91 CITY OF MONTICELLO 000003 SEWER AND WATER BILL 162.00 15026 00/10/91 COAST TO COAST 000006 BULBS 8 MISC SUPPLIES 23.61 15025 09/10/91 OAMLHEIMER DISTRIBUT 000009 JUICE PURCHASE 32.90 ' 15025 09/10/01 DAHLMEIMER DISTRIBUT 000000 BEER PURCHASE 21.069.66 21.007.36 •CHECK TOTAL 15020 00/10/91 DAY OISTRIBUTING COM 000010 OLIVES/LEMONS/MUSHROOM 60.55 15028 00/10/91 DAY DISTRIBUTING COM 600010 BEER PURCHASE 035.00 077.65 •CHECK TOTAL ' 15827 00/10/91 DICK WHOLESALE CO.. 0ODO11,AEER PURCHASE 1.870.90 18027 09/10/01 DICK WHOLESALE CO.. 800011 MISC SUPPLIES 35.50 1.712.40 •CHECK TOTAL 16626 09/10/91 GLASS MUT/TME 000050 DOOR REPAIRS 28.63 15020 00/10/91 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I 000019 JUICE PURCHASE 13.00 15629 09/10/01 OROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I 000010 MISC SUPPLIES 25.15 15029 09/10/91 OROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I 000010 SEER PURCHASE 24.802.&S 24.721.50 •CHECK TOTAL 15810 08/10/91 JOHNSON SRO$ WHOLESA 000022 WINE PURCHASE 245.01 15030 00/10/01 JOHNSON OROS VMOLESA 800022 LIQUOR CREDIT 33.3 2CR 211.09 •CHECK TOTAL 16831 00/10/01 JUDO CANDY 0 TOBACCO 800021 SUPPLIES - BAGS 361.69 15831 08/10/91 JUDE CANOY 6 TOBACCO 000021 CICS AND CIGARS/REGAL 602.64 15831 06/10/01 JUDE CANDY 6 TOBACCO 000021 MISC SUPPLIES FOR 118A 15.92 15931 00/10/91 JUDE CANOY 8 TOBACCO 600021 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 170.00 060.64 •CHECK TOTAL 3 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 08/08/91 10:gbtII Dtabureement Journal ` WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INV'— LIOUOR FUND J - 15831 00/10/91 KRWC RADIO STATION 800070 ADVERTISING 98.00 p• 15833 08/10/01 LIEFERT TRUCKING 800015 FREIGHT CHARGES 660.77 15936 08/10/91 MAUS FOODS 800017 MISC SUPPLIES 3.39 ' 15635 08/10/01 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 800079 UTILITIES 7.70 +5630 08/10/91 MONTICELLO OFFICE OR 800031 OFFICE SUPPLIES +3.50 15837 08/10/01 MONTICELLO TIMES 800037 ADVERTISING +67.20 15838 08/10/91 NORTHERN STATES POV,E 800035 UTILITIES 1.109.98 15839 08/10/91 O'HARA BROS. COMPANI 800058 COOLERS A CAN HOLDERS 706.60 15060 08/10/91 OLSON 6 SONS ELECTRI 800038 REPAIR POP MACHINE 60.00 15861 00/10/01 RON'S ICE COMPANY 800061 ICE PURCHASE 1.101.57 15867 09/10/91 SEVEN-UP BOTTLING CO 800063 POP PURCHASE 139.00 15863 09/10/91 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 800065 GRAPEFRUIT JUICE 16.05 15843 08/10/91 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 600065 STRAWS/CUPS FOR RESAL 132.60 15863 08/10/91 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 800065 MISC SUPPLIES 55.10 ' 703.55 -CHECK TOTAL 16846 08/10/01 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 BEER PURCHASE 11.587.55 15865 08/10/91 TV TIMES 000110 ADVERTISING 170.00 15846 OB/10/01 VIKING COCA-COLA BOT 800051 POP PURCHASE 456.55 LIOUOR FUND + TOTAL 93.700.97 p• a• 08/12/91 16:45:06 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD REVENUE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Jul91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 GENERAL FUND . TAXES Current Ad Valorem Taxes 1,444,290 648,534 795,756 Delinquent Ad Valorem Ta 6,088 (6,088) Mobile Home Taxes 36,578 (36,578) Pen 6 Int -Ad Valorem Tax 8,000 12,167 (4,167) Forfeited Tax Sale Appor ---------- ---------- TOTAL TAXES ---------- 1,452,290 703,367 748,923 LICENSES S PERMITS Liquor Licenses 17,350 17,991 (641) Beer Licenses 1,600 168 1,433 Set Up Licensee 325 75 250 Other Business License/P 50 (50) Building Permits 40,000 10,330 29,670 Use Permi 1,750 100 1,650 -variances/Cond •dlumbing Connection Perm Animal Licensee 500 1,310 (810) Bingo Licenses Cable Franchise Fees Other Non -Bus Licenso/Pe 2,000 ---------- 1,126 ---------- 875 ---------- TOTAL LICENSES 6 PERMITS 63,525 31,149 32,376 INTERGOVERNMENTAL Federal Grants - CETA Local Government Aide Homestead Credits - RACA Fire Dept Aid 37,000 37,000 Police Dept Aid 18,000 18,000 County Highway Granite 4,000 4,000 Recycling Incentive 4,800 ---------- 1,621 ---------- 3,179 ---------- TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 63,800 1,621 62,179 CHARGES FOR SERVICES Zoning/Subdivision Fees 500 1,925 (1,425) Sale of Maps 6 Publicati 100 90 11 Motor Vehicle/Dop Reg Fo 70,000 51,206 18,794 Aesoesmont Searches 600 447 153 Inspection Fess 10,500 (40) 10,540 'ire Protection Tap Cont 42,715 22,364 20,352 Special Garbage Proc/Rec 4,000 12,446 (6,446) 08/12/91 16:45:06 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD REVENUE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Jul91 08/12/91 16:45:06 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 Park Fees 500 500 Other Charges for Servic 1,000 ---------- 87 ---------- 913 ---------- TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 129,915 88,524 41,391 FINES & FORFEITURES Animal Impoundment Fines 9,000 7,321 ---------- 1,679 ---------- TOTA.L FINES 6 FORFEITURES ---------- 9,000 7,321 1,679 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Spec Asmt Principal - Co 983 (983) Spec Asmt Pen 6 Interest 75 ---------- ---------- 75 ---------- TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 75 983 (908) MISCELLANEOUS Interest Earnings 64,100 64,100 Rents 4,700 2,765 1,935 Contributions - private 2,400 2,400 Sale of Property 100 100 Refunds/Reimbursements 11,000 1,587 9,413 Other Misc Revenue 100 975 ---------- (875) ---------- TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS ---------- 82,400 5,327 77,073 OTHER SOURCES Contrib from Enterprise Transfer from Other Fund ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL OTHER SOURCES TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES 1,801,005 .......... 838,291 .......... 962,714 .......... TOTAL UDAG FUND REVENUES 13,925 5,676 8,249 TOTAL LIBRARY FUND REVENUES 26,500 12,698 13,802 TOTAL HRA FUND REVENUES 278,850 142,908 135,942 .......... .......... .....■.... 08/12/91 16:45:06 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD REVENUE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Ju191 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 TOTAL SHADE TREE FUND REVENU 44,350 21,588 22,762 TOTAL PARK 6 REC GRANT REVEN TOTAL OAA FUND REVENUES 31,625 14,548 17,077 TOTAL CAP PROJ REV FUND REVE 167,254 89,784 77,471 TOTAL EDA FUND REVENUES 10,850 6,034 4,816 TOTAL SEWER IMPR FUND REVENU 14,800 2,821 11,979 T,(..L WATER IMPR FUND REVENU 11,100 2,100 91000 TOTAL WATER FUND REVENUES 141,055 .o.....e.. ..tea 68,827 ...... 72,228 .......... TOTAL SEWER FUND REVENUES 426,890 248,998 177,892 TOTAL LIQUOR FUND REVENUES 1,289,250 794,410 494,840 TOTAL TRANSIT FUND REVENUES 72,739 .......... .......... 34,884 37,855 .......... TOTAL INVESTMENT FUND REVENU .......... .......... 77,593 (77,593) .......... 08/12/91 16:45:06 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD REVENUE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Jul91 APPROVED BUDGET 1991 *DEBT SERVICE REVENUE SUMMARY: • Taxes 1,021,937 • Licenses & Permits 490,105 • Intergovernmental *REVENUE SUMMARY - ALL FUNDS: • Charges for Services • Fines & Forfeitures + Taxes • Special Assessments 358,907 • Miscellaneous Revenue 106,625 • Other Sources 165,034 *TOTAL DEBT SERVICE REVENU 1,652,503 •CAPITAL PROJECT REVENUE SUMMARY • Taws Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental • Charges for Services • Fines & Forfeitures • Special Assessments • Miscellaneous Revenue • Other Sources *TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT REV YTD REMAINING POSTED BALANCE 490,105 531,832 792,496 (433,589) 106,625 165,034 - 1,282,601 369,902 ..v.ee.vo. o...e..�.e 08112/91 16:45:06 .......... ••fffffffi•♦fit•ffff+•RifRitRiffff+ff+••�iffRtf .......... iffft•♦t•i•f .......... Rffifffifffftf•♦ffff• tftRff tttftfffftittftfiRttff tiff tf tilt/•tRtfRtttt ltt *REVENUE SUMMARY - ALL FUNDS: + Taxes 3,007,078 1,464,614 1,542,464 + Licenses & Permits 63,525 31,149 32,376 + Intergovernmental 107,842 21,331 86,511 + Charges for Services 1,971,870 1,187,610 784,260 + Fines & Forfeitures 91000 7,321 1,679 • Special Assessments 364,597 814,618 (450,021) + Miscellaneous Revenue 293,750 117,117 176,633 • Other Sources 165,034 ---------- ---------- 165,034 *TOTAL REVENUES - ALL FUND 5,982,696 3,643,761 ---------- 2,338,935 .......... ......W... m....r...I CITY OF MONTICELLO 08/12/91 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 17:53:54 r FOR THE PERIOD ENDING `. 31Jul91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT: COUNC IL Personal Services 12,525 7,354 5,171 Supplies Other Services 6 Charges 4,600 1,081 3,520 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses ---------- ---------- TOTAL COUNCIL EXPENSE ---------- 17,125 8,435 8,690 ADMINISTRATIVE Personal Services 124,450 87,951 36,499 Supplies 4,200 5,267 (1,067) Other. Services 6 Charges 21,450 13,181 8,269 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses ---------- ---------- TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPEN ---------- 150,100 106,399 43,701 TOTAL ELECTIONS EXPENSE .......... .......... .......... FINANCE Personal Services 75,475 34,833 40,642 Supplies 200 484 (284) Other Services 6 Charges 525 726 299 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL FINANCE EXPENSE 76,200 35,543 40,657 TOTAL AUDIT EXPENSE 11,500 11,800 (300) -SESSING Personal Services 6,505 10,992 (4,487) supplies 475 476 (1) CITY OF MONTICELLO 08/12/91 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 17:53:54 FOR THE PERIOD 31Ju191 ENDING APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 Other Services & Charges 9,375 4,864 4,511 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses ---------- ---------- TOTAL ASSESSING EXPENSE ---------- 16,355 16,331 24 TOTAL LEGAL EXPENSE 26,175 12,956 13,219 PLANNING & ZONING Personal Services 32,075 14,811 17,264 Supplies 100 8 92 Other Services 6 Charges 46,800 9,903 36,897 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL PLANNING 6 ZONING EX 78,975 24,722 54,253 DATA PROCESSING Personal Services Supplies 1,500 1,347 153 Other Services 6 Charges 14,675 7,058 7,617 Capital Outlay 6,650 2,284 4,366 Debt Service 28,900 16,853 12,047 Other Uses ---------- TOTAL DATA PROCESSING EXPE ---------- 51,725 .......... ---------- 27,542 .......... 24,183 .......... CITY HALL Personal Services 3,450 2,510 940 Supplies 2,350 1,020 1,330 Other Sorvices a Charges 25,250 11,927 13,323 Capital Outlay 20,725 1,873 18,852 Debt Service Other Uses ---------- TOTAL CITY HALL EXPENSE ---------- 51,775 ---------- 17,330 34,445 .......... .......... .......... aEPUTY REGISTRAR CITY OF MONTICELLO 08/12/91 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 17:53:54 / FOR THE PERIOD ENDING \ 31Jul9l APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 Personal Services 58,625 34,290 24,335 Supplies 50 325 (275) Other Services & Charges 1,250 702 548 Capital Outlay 168 (168) Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL DEPUTY REGISTRAR EXP ---------- 59,925 c o ao mn ---------- 35,485 oomammvvm� ---------- 24,440 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT: 539,$55 .....mmemm 296,543 vvmevaoemm a my mm v X243:312 mmvvmnommm PUBLIC SAFETY: TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT EXPE 172,050 .......... 100,359 om®mvwmmmm 71,691 ........... FIRE DEPT personal Services 61,350 11,259 50,091 Supplies 4,125 2,239 1,886 Other Services & Charges 28,650 21,492 7,150 Capital Outlay 55,850 12,800 43,050 Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL FIRE DEPT EXPENSE ---------- 149,975 wwwwmmwmC. ---------- 47,790 mmwmmwwmwm ---------- 102,185 ---------- BUILDING INSPECTIONS Personal Services 29,255 11,028 18,227 Supplies 325 981 (656) Other Services & Charges 4,850 2,447 2,403 Capital Outlay 10,000 10,516 (516) Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL BLDG INSPECTION EXPE ---------- 44,430 www wwwwww. ---------- 24,972 wwwwwwwwww ---------- 19,458 .ww.wmawws CIVIL DEFENSE Personal Services 6,200 2,386 3,814 Supplies 100 100 Other Services & Charges 625 125 500 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses CITY OF MONTICELLO 08/12/91 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 17:53:54 FOR THE PERIOD 31Jul91 ENDING APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 TOTAL CIVIL DEFENSE EXPENS ---------- 6,925 ---------- 2,512 --------- 4,413 ANIMAL CONTROL Personal Services Supplies 1,125 1,064 61 Other Services & Charges 17,925 13,263 4,662 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL EXPEN ---------- 19,050 v v v v ---------- 14,327 .vvOva.vv. ---------- 4,723 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY: 392:430 189,959 vvv.v0vevv 202,471 PT'-',IC WORKS: 1 t/ADMIN & ENGINEERING J Personal Services 53,800 31,295 22,505 Supplies 525 385 140 Other Services & Charges 15,650 7,152 8,498 Capital Outlay 900 935 (35) Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL PW/ADMIN & ENGR EXPE ---------- 70,875 .......... ---------- 39,767 .......... ---------- 31,108 .......... PW/INSPECTIONS Personal Services 28,225 13,536 14,689 Supplies 236 (236) Other Services & Charges 1,200 418 782 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL PW/INSPECTIONS EXPEN ---------- 29,425 .......... ---------- 14,190 .........r ---------- 15,235 ........s PW/STREETS & ALLEYS Personal Services 96,700 69,404 27,296 Supplies 37,000 28,031 8,969 Other Services & Charges 10,200 4,443 5,757 Capital Outlay 47,500 35,917 11,583 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Ju191 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 Debt Service Other Uses -------------------- ---------- TOTAL PW/STR 3 ALLEYS EXPE 191,400 137,795 53,605 PW/ICE 6 SNOW Personal Services Supplies Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL PW/ICE & SNOW EXPENS /SHOP 6 GARAGE Personal Services Supplies Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL PW/SHOP 6 GARAGE EXP PW/PARKING LOTS Personal Services Supplies Other Services 6 Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL PW/PARKING LOT EXPEN PW/STREET LIGHTING Personal Services Supplies COther Services 6 Charges ::apital Outlay Debt Service 3,000 8,933 (5,933) 8,600 424 8,176 11500 1,500 ---------- 13,100 .o�ovoee.. ---------- 9,357 eae..000ve ---------- 3,743 e�e.Qee..o 2,943 (2,943) 5,700 4,641 1,059 12,500 4,600 71900 3,400 1,815 1,585 ---------- 21,600 .......... ---------- 13,999 .......... ---------- 7,601 .......... 800 800 2,500 481 2,019 125 125 ---------- 3,425 .......... ---------- 481 .......... ---------- 2,944 .......... 300 300 39,700 22,003 17,697 08/12/91 17:53:54 CITY OF MONTICELLO 08/12/91 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 17:53:54 FOR THE PERIOD 31Jul9l ENDING J APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 Other Uses TOTAL PW/STREET LIGHT EXPE ---------- 40,000 ---------- 22,003 ---------- 17,997 REFUSE COLLECTION Personal Services 900 1,047 (147) Supplies 6,300 238 6,062 Other Services s Charges 215,050 118,538 96,512 Capital Outlay 300 800 (500) Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL REFUSE COLLECTION EX ---------- 222,550 as amammaa ----------- 120,623 o a a m3S8,213a ---------- 101,927 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS: 592,375 ma aaa 234,162 C. ,.CURE 6 RECREATION: ✓ MUSEUM Personal Services 1,850 1,369 481 Supplies 100 138 (38) Other Services 6 Charges 2,175 572 1,603 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL MUSEUM EXPENSE ---------- 4,125 arammammaa ---------- 2,079 aa....erm. ---------- 2,046 ..m..ave.. SENIOR CENTER Personal Services 29,550 14,681 14,669 Supplies Other Services 6 Charges 2,200 2,202 (2) Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL SENIOR CENTER EXPENS ---------- 31,750 .......... ---------- 16,883 .......... ---------- 14,867 ....arse.. TOTAL COMMUNITY ED EXPENSE 17,000 17,000 ........s. .......... .......... \J ../ ,OTAL Y.M.C.A. EXPENSE 7,500 4,375 3,125 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Jul91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 PARKS & RECREATION Personal Services Supplies Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL PARKS & REC EXPENSE TOTAL CULTURE & RECREATION: URBAN REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT personal Services -Supplies Other Services 6 Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL ECON DEVELOPMENT EXP TOTAL URBAN REDEVELOPMENT 6 MISCELLANEOUS/UNALLOCATED: TOTAL UNALLOCATED EXPENSE 90,500 32,312 58,188 14,150 9,926 4,224 7,745 4,727 3,018 10,350 4,762 5,588 122,745 51,727 p6C92,065 71,018 183,120� .ova...... ........e. 91,055� .....�.... 28,775 14,267 14,508 150 150 13,275 2,625 10,650 ---------- 42,200 ---------- 16,891 ---------- 25,309 .......... .......... 42,200 .......... 16,891 25,309 TOTAL INSURANCE EXPENSE .......... 51,025 .......... .......... 31,400 .......... .......... 19,625 .......... TOTAL MISC/UNALLOCATED: 51,025 .......... 31,400 .......... 19,625 .......... TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENSE 11801,005 .......... 985,072 .......... 815,933 .......... • C :RAL FUND EXPENSE SUMMARY 08/12/91 17:53:54 •TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 1,801,005 985,072 815,933 aarraarrraaaaaarrraaraa araaarrrra• _J CITY OF MONTICELLO 08/12/91 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 17:53:54 FOR THE PERIOD ENDING j 31Jul91 J APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 • General Government 539,855 296,543 243,312 • Public Safety 392,430 189,959 202,471 • Public works 592,375 358,213 234,162 • Culture 6 Recreation 183,120 92,065 91,055 • Urban Redevelopment b Hou 42,200 16,891 25,309 • Misc/Unallocated 51,025 31,400 19,625 •TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 1,801,005 985,072 815,933 aarraarrraaaaaarrraaraa araaarrrra• _J CITY OF MONTICELLO 08/12/91 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 17:53:54 FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Jul91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 TOTAL UDAG FUND EXPENSE LIBRARY FUND Personal Services 3,450 625 2,825 Supplies 2,000 617 1,383 Other Services 6 Charges 17,925 14,815 3,110 Capital Outlay 3,125 315 2,810 Debt Service Other Uses ---------- ---------- TOTAL LIBRARY FUND EXPENSE ---------- 26,500 16,373 10,127 HRA (HSG 6 REDEV AUTH) FUND TIF 61 - IXI 1 2,800 54 2,746 TiF •2 - METCALF 6 LARSON 4,285 4,284 1 -F F3 - FSI `.F 04 - IXI 4 22,960 22,960 TIF 45 - CONSTRUCTION 5 TIF i6 - RAINDANCE TIF Y7 - NAWCO TIF 08 - NSP 1,840 1,840 TIF 49 - TAPPER 15,580 (15,580) TIF 410 - REMMELE 115 (115) TIF #11 - MARTIE FARM SVCE ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL HRA FUND EXPENSE 216,170 .......... 32,954 .......... 183,216 .......... SHADE TREE FUND Personal Services 14,650 6,025 8,625 Supplies 600 412 188 Other Services 6 Charges 15,100 2,278 12,822 Capital Outlay 14,000 14,497 (497) Debt Service Other Uses ---------- ---------- TOTAL SHADE TREE FUND EXPENS ---------- 44,350 .......... 23,213 .......... 21,137 .......... TOTAL PARK b REC FUND EXPENS .m........ .......... .......... TLL OAA FUND EXPENSE 31,625 31,625 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Jul91 08/12191 17:53:54 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 TOTAL CAP PROJ REVOLVING EXP 236,000 64,344 171,656 TOTAL ECON DEV AUTH FUND EXP 21250 200 2,050 TOTAL SEWER IMPR FUND EXPENS 95,000 =....a==.= 75,058 nannnvncaa 19,942 aaa.aam.== TOTAL WATER IMPR FUND EXPENS WATER FUND ...a..m.a. n.a..aa... .......... Total Unallocated Expenses Admin/Gen Operating Personal Services 54,850 38,403 16,447 Supplies 30,900 10,834 20,066 J Other Services b Charges 48,005 23,694 24,311 Capital Outlay 7,300 3,681 3,619 Debt Service Other Uses Total Admin/Gen Oper Exp ---------- 141,055 ma.nm.m.ma ---------- 76,612 ama..amamm ---------- 64,443 TOTAL WATER FUND EXPENSES 141,055 msa....... 76,612 .......... nn ammmm 64,443 ss.ssm..i. SEWER FUND Wastewater Treatment Plant Personal Services 1,175 783 392 Supplies 5,500 2,675 2,825 Other Services b Charges 352,975 214,310 138,665 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses Total WWTP Expenses ---------- 359,650 .......... ---------- 217,768 .......... ---------- 141,882 Admin/Gen Operating .......... Personal Services 34,225 13,219 21,006 Supplies 5,850 7,171 (1,321) Other Services 6 Charges 17,115 3,466 13,649 Capital Outlay 9,500 5,251 4,249 TRANSPORTATION FUND CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 30,745 .......... 27,740 .......... FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Jul91 12,955 5,813 7,142 APPROVED YTD REMAINING 1,299 BUDGET POSTED BALANCE (100) 1991 Debt Service 550 550 Other Uses ---------- ---------- Total Admin/Gen Oper Exp ---------- 67,240 29,107 38,133 TOTAL SEWER FUND EXPENSES C3426,890 246,876 180,014 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND Purchasing Personal Services Supplies 965,650 588,948 376,702 Other Services S Charges 6,000 2,974 3,026 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses ---------- ---------- Total Purchasing Expense ---------- 00971,6500 a=59109220 379,728 Admin/Gen Operating Personal Services 96,950 58,573 38,377 Supplies 6,900 4,619 2,281 Other Services 6 Charges 55,225 24,248 30,977 Capital Outlay 19,000 1,832 17,168 Debt Service Other Uses 5,475 4,444 1,031 Total Operationa Exponao 183,550 0 00 93,716 89,834 ®638469,562 TOTAL LIQUOR FUND EXPENSES 1,155 200685, 00.00..00. .0000..00. 0 000000..00 TRANSPORTATION FUND Total Operating Expenses 58,485 ..0 ....... 30,745 .......... 27,740 .......... Administration Personal Services 12,955 5,813 7,142 Supplies 1,299 1,299 Other Services & Charges 100 (100) Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses C Total Administration Exp . 000 4,25:0 0 5,913 ......... 8,341 .......... 08/12/91 17:53:54 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Jul91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION FUND EX 72,739 36,658 36,081 TOTAL INVESTMENT HOLDING EXP 08/12/91 17:53:54 ffffiifffffiffffiffffifffffiffff •DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE SUMMARY: • Personal Services • Supplies • Other Services 6 Charges • Capital Outlay • Debt Service 1,780,500 1,722,013 56,487 • Other Uses ---------- ---------- ---------- •TOTAL DEBT SVC FUND EXPEN 1,780,500 1,722,013 58,487 o=e�eee=ee o�e�aoaQoo oae�ve=ave ` J f •fffffff iffffffffiffffiffffffff •CAP PROJ EXPENDITURE SUMMARY: • Personal Services • Supplies • Other Services 6 Charges 24,764 (24,764) • Capital Outlay 87 (87) • Debt Service • Other Uses ---------- ------- ---------- •TOTAL CAP PROJ FUND EXPEN 24,850 (24,850) •iff•fff•ff••f ffff•ffffffffffffffffffffff••fffff•ifffffifff•••f •ffifffffffifffff •ff ffffifffififff••ffff if••ffffiff ffffiffffffffffff •EXPENDITURE SUMMARY - ALL FUNDS: • Personal Servicos 989,590 537,371 452,219 • Supplies 1,106,874 672,505 434,369 • Other Services 6 Charges 1,380,750 795,453 585,297 • Capital Outlay 539,600 236,936 302,664 • Debt Service 1,841,960 1,743,151 98,809 • Other Uses 170,510 4,444 166,066 ) •la,jTAL EXPENSES - ALL FUNDS 6,029,284 3,989,860 2,039,424 v