Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 09-23-1991
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Monday, September 23, 1991 - 7:00 p.m. Mayor: Ken Maus Members: Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen, Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held September 9, 1991. 3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. 4. Consideration of approval of County State Aid Highway maintenance agreement with Wright County. 5. Consideration of replacing underground heat pipes at the City's wastewater treatment plant. 6. Consideration of study for public works facility expansion. 7. Consideration of replacing sewer jet truck and chassis. 8. Consideration of a resolution authorizing preparation of Hart Boulevard storm sewer outlet feasibility study. 9. Consideration of a resolution authorizing preparation of Meadow Oak pond outlet feasibility study. 10. Approval of bills for the month of September. 11. Adjournment. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, September 9, 1941 - 6:30 p.m. Members Present.: Ken Maus, Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen, Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle Members Absent: None Representatives of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission were present and gave a brief overview of their activities at the Northern States Power Nuclear Plant in Monticello. Issues that the NRC is now dealing with relative to the nuclear plant include the following: 1. Relicensing --Current license expires in the year 2010. The Monticello nuclear plant is in the process of extending the present license. The Monticello plant will be the first in the U.S. to submit a license renewal request. 2. Low level radioactive waste will not be accepted by outstate locations after January 1993. 3. High level radioactive waste disposal site for disposal of spent fuel rods is being developed by the federal government and is supposed to be ready by the year 2010. Resistence to development of a disposal site has caused a delay. 2. Approval of minutes. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Clint Herbst to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held August 26, 1991, as submitted. Voting in favor: Ken Maus, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Dan Blonigon. Brad Fyle abstained, as he was not present at the August 26, 1991, mooting. 3. Citizens comments/pot it ions, requests, and complaints. Mike Beck, President of Meadow Oak Estates, requested that the City take action to develop an outlet for the Meadow Oak water retention pond. Beck was concerned about the potential for flooding, and he was concerned that much of his lawn and land once available for park area is now a pond. Ken Maus agreed that an outlet needs to be developed, and it may need to be developed relatively soon. Page I Council Minutes - 9/9/91 John Simola reported that there is a significant amount of pond capacity remaining in the park area; therefore, the threat of flood is not great. However, he concurred that development of an overflow system should be developed which would guarantee the full use of the park area adjoining the pond and guarantee that the pond would not rise to a level that would cause flooding of homes adjacent to the pond. Staff was directed to develop cost estimates for a storm water feasibility study, which would analyze alternatives for providing an outlet to the Meadow Oak storm water retention pond. Patrice Bogart requested that the City Council consider development of an outdoor wading pool. She noted that a large percentage of the residents in the community have small children and that a wading pool provides inexpensive recreation for these families. She also noted that other cities have outdoor wading pools that are very popular in the summer. It was the consensus of Council to direct Bogart to the Parke Commission for further study of the potential development of a wading pool. 4. Public hearinq on assessment and adoption of assessment roll for sidewalk repair and replacement, Proiect 91 -SW -1. Ken Maus opened the public hearing. Don Doran was present and requested that he receive payment for 759 of the cost of the width of his driveway he recently installed since his driveway will actually be used as part of the sidewalk. Doran stated that had he not put a driveway there, he would have extended sidewalk across the area. John Simola noted that it's been our policy for the City to reimburse for repairs or replacement, but it's not necessarily meant for now construction. Doran noted that he would be glad to got a one-year guarantee on the cement that was installed with his driveway. Ken Maus asked Doran to define his credit request. It was Maus's concern that granting Doran's request for the City to grant a credit for 759 of the driveway/sidewalk cost, the City could be providing a greater credit than what Doran's actual cost was. Page 2 9 Council Minutes - 9/9/91 The public hearing was closed. After discussion, a motion was made by Dan Blonlgen and seconded by Brad Fyle to set the assessment at $3.70 per lineal foot at an interest rate of 7.258 for a period of five years and to grant Don Doran a credit associated with installation of the driveway not to exceed 508 of his project cost. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 91-31. Consideration of a request to amend the probationary period/ residence requirement for Richard Cline. Rick Wolfsteller reported that Richard Cline was appointed to the Water System/Wastewater Collection System Operator position In 1990. As part of the job description, the individual in this position has to be able to respond to an emergency within a 10 -minute period of time after being notified. When Mr. Cline took the position, he signed an employment agreement stating he fully understands that his residence had to be within a 10 -minute response time from the city. He acknowledged that failure to live within this response time could result in termination of his employment. Wolfsteller went on to note that Cline was able to sell his home, and City staff assumed that Clime would be relocating to within an acceptable distance; however, Cline has indicated he is having difficulty in finding a suitable residence within his price range and has found a home that does not appear to easily meet the 10 -minute response time he had agreed to. Wolfsteller noted that under perfect traffic conditions from the home proposed by Cline, it appears that it would take 10-12 minutes to make it to Monticello. Council was asked to review the situation and determine if the response time meets the requirement or consider amending tho response time requirement. Tim Connors of Local 49 was present. He noted that a 10 - minute response time is not necessarily a reasonable amount of time. Other cities that he works with do not have a 10-minuto response timo. Most respond by beeper and have a 25-minuto response time. He also noted that in Monticello, employees are required to be within a 10-minuto response time area; however, they are not required to be on call. In other cities, employees are told to be on call and are paid accordingly. Dan Blonigen noted that the City should be establishing a response area and not time. Page 3 __ o Council Minutes - 9/9/91 Ken Maus noted that rather than change the requirement, he preferred to interpret the present situation as meeting the spirit of the 10 -minute requirement. Brad Fyle concurred. If Rich is within 10 miles, it basically meets the standard. Ken Maus noted that quick response depends on the employee. For instance, an employee could be five blocks away; however, he may still be slower to respond if he does not take his position seriously. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Dan Blonigen to agree that Mr. Cline's proposed residence northeast of Big Lake falls within the 10 -minute response time requirement. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of adopting a resolution establishing quidelines for privately funded improvements to city parks and other Public property. Assistant Administrator O'Neill noted that at the previous meeting of the Council a group of individuals residing on or near East River Street have volunteered to develop a landscape arboretum in East Bridge Park. At the meeting, Council provided general concept approval of the plan; however, Council requested additional detail regarding the plan. Council also requested staff develop guidelines with the help of the Parks Commission that could be used to govern this type of use of city parks. O'Neill reported that the Parks Commission has reviewed the guidelines as outlined in the resolution under consideration. City Council reviewed the guidelines and focused their discussion on the type of identification signs that would be allowed in the arboretum. After discussion, it was determined that plant identification signs would be allowed; however, these signs would be limited to one square foot in size and one sign per plant typo. Also, signs indicating memorials would not be allowed without separate Council approval. Dick Frio noted that the plant identification signs are important for their educational aspect. He also noted that in case of vandalism, the volunteer group is responsible for replacing or repairing signs. Pago 4 Council Minutes - 9/9/91 After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Clint Herbst to approve the resolution outlining the guidelines for privately funded improvements to city parks or other public property with the deletion of item 82 and item C2. Voting in favor: Ken Maus, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle. Opposed: Dan Blonigen. SEE RESOLUTION 91-32. Council reviewed the detailed plan prepared by the volunteers developing the East Bridge Park aboretum. Dan Blonigen noted that the plan is not drawn to scale, and he does not feel that the plan gives a clear idea of where the plants are going. Ken Maus disagreed and stated that there is a good understanding of what's expected with development of the arboretum. After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Clint Herbst to approve the East Bridge Park arboretum plan. Voting in favor: Ken Maus, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle. Opposed: Dan Blonigen. Uodato on Citv Hall parking lot expansion. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan Blonigen to direct staff to develop plans and specifications and bid the project over the winter months in anticipation of spring construction. Motion carried unanimous ly. Consideration of revised plan for remodeling and additions to the information center. John Simola reviewed alternative methods for remodeling of the information center. He noted that one alternative would be to authorizer staff to pursue building public restrooms at the site and improvements to the information building at an estimated cost of $30,570. The second alternative would be to direct staff to have a unisex bathroom constructed in the information center and have the building improvements made as described at an estimated cost of $14,440. The third altornativo would be to modify the plans again as directed by the City Council to include any combination of the plane as prosented or a now concept as directed. The fourth aitornativo would be to look at the possibility of repairs to the existing rostrooms. Originally $3,000 was budgeted for repairs to the existing facilities for this year. The fifth alternative would be to do nothing. Page 5 Council Minutes - 9/9191 Dan Blonigen noted that the City should acquire a commitment from the Chamber of Commerce before the project is initiated. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan Blonigen to direct staff to demolish existing bathrooms and remodel the information center to include a unisex bathroom at an estimated cost of $14,440. In addition, the site should be developed so as to allow for future development of public restrooms and grant staff latitude to adjust the plan to allow for other improvements deemed necessary by the Chamber of Commerce. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of reviewing second quarter liquor store report. Rick Wolfsteller summarized the report and noted that in the first six months of 1991 sales were up $70,000 or 12.38 increase over last year. The gross profit is up $12,000 or 98 over last year. The operational expenses also increased $8,400 over the same period last year; but as a percent of total sales, operation expenses were down 13.18 from 13.28 last year. This result is a net income from operations of $62,000 for the first six month;, which is an increase of $3,647 over last year's net income. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan Blonigen to accept the report as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Consideration of authorizinq the purchase of a PC computer cash register system for the liquor store. Rick Wolfsteller reported that as part of the overall computerization process, we've planned on converting the cash registers at the liquor store to a computerized system that would provide better inventory control and increase accuracy within our operation. Joe Hartman has contacted a number of area liquor stores that have converted to a PC computer system and has received favorable input on their conversion. Joe Hartman, Cathy Shuman, and myself have received demonstrations from two vendors who specialize in these systems for liquor store operations, and we feel that the system provided by Total Register Systems, Inc., of Crystal will adequately fit our needs at a reasonable price. Wolfstellor went on to note that purchase of the computer system is in the 1991 budget In the amount of $15,000. it appears that the cost to install this system along with cabinet modifications will cost somewhere in the neighborhood Pago 6 C� Council Minutes - 919191 of $21,000. Wolfsteller noted that although we only budgeted $15,000 for computer acquisition, there should not be a problem with expending additional dollars for counter and office modifications necessary to complete the installation. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Clint Herbst to authorize the purchase of two TRSS Avis cash registers and related computer systems for the liquor store at a cost of $14,995. Motion includes authorizing new cash register countertops, installation of electrical service, and office cabinet modifications to accommodate the new system at a cost of $5,000 to $6,000. Motion carried unanimously. 11. Consideration of authorizing Purchase of cardboard baler for the liquor store. Rick Wolfsteller reported that because of recent City efforts to promote recycling amongst its residents and because the largest bulk of our refuse at the liquor store consists of cardboard boxes, Joe Hartman has been investigating the purchase of a cardboard baler which would allow us to recycle all of our cardboard hoses. Joe hes obtained two quotes for balers that range in price from $3,000 to $3,800 depending on the type. Wolfsteller went on to recommend that a baler of some typo be purchased. The amount of cardboard waste generated by the liquor store is substantial, and we should be recycling this cardboard. Wolfsteller went on to recommend that the City purchase the E.P. Baler because of its better performance and lower maintenance due to the hydraulic system used in the baling process. Ken Maus concurred that the hydraulic system is more durable and that his experience has been that the maintenance required on this type of system is minimal. After discussion, a motion was made by Dan Blonigon and seconded by Clint Herbst to approve the purchase of a cardboard baler from E.P. Baler in the amount of $3,860. Motion carried unanimously. 12. Consideration of establishing an assistant manager Position at the liquor store. Rick Wolfstollor reported that currently our liquor store operation has what the City considers two full-time employees, Manager Joe Hartman and Clork Cindie Erickson. Both Joe and Pago 7 Council Minutes - 9/9/91 Cindie work primarily daytime hours with the balance of employees being part-time covering afternoons, evenings, and weekends. Wolfsteller noted that the bulk of our sales now occur in late afternoon, evenings, and weekends. Although both Joe and Cindie do work occasionally during these hours, it could be perceived by many of our customers that there does not appear. to be someone in charge during the high volume periods of the day. With many of our part-time employees being teenagers, it's important that someone on staff be in charge of the operation during evenings and weekends and that Council consider authorizing an assistant manager/night supervisor position. Joe Hartman concurred that the assistant manager position would be appropriate not only for supervising and directing part-time employees but also in managing the overall operation. He noted that typically the liquor store has experienced high turnover of part-time employees. As a result, productivity and efficiency of these employees is sometimes limited. Wolfsteller went on to review the job description and proposed a salary rpnging from $18,nnn to $21,000 per year. He also noted, however, that though the pay scale would be approximately double that of a part-time employee, it is anticipated that the extra cost would only amount to $8,000 to $10,000 a year over what part-time employees are currently earning. In addition, continual training of new part-time employees would be eliminated, which has not been very productive. Ken Maus concurred that the store needs a watchdog on evenings. We need a responsible full-time employee available during these hours. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Dan Blonigen to authorize creation of an assistant manager position which would be a full-time job to cover afternoons, evenings, and weekends. Motion includes authorization to advertise for the position. Motion carried unanimously. There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned. Jeff O'Neill Assistant Administrator Page 8 Council Agenda - 9/23/91 4. Consideration of approval of County State Aid Highway maintenance agreement with Wriqht County. (R.W.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Each year the City of Monticello performs certain maintenance on County State Aid Highways and receives money from the County for that work. For example, we remove snow and ice from County Road 75 from Willow Street east to County State Aid Highway 39 near the Total Mart store. We perform 258 of the snow and ice removal on County Road 39 from the Monticello Public Works Building to County Road 75, and we perform all miscellaneous maintenance on CSAH 58 and 59, which are actually portions of Locust Street, 4th Street, Walnut Street, and 7th Street in downtown Monticello. The County reimburses us the cost based upon their previous year's cost for related maintenance in the county. For 1990, we would receive $5,274.42 for this maintenance based on 1989 average costs. The maintenance agreement is usually entered into much earlier in the year; however, our insurance company had problems with the language in our existing contract and requested changes, and iL Louk several months for the changes to be worked out between the County Attorney and the City and its Attorney as to the language to be used. The agreement enclosed in your agenda packet is the final document as accepted by both attorneys. We would expect next year's agreement to change in that CSAH 58 and CSAH 59 will become part of the municipal stato aid system when we'd officially receive direct state aid. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be toapprove the maintenance agreomont as enclosed. 2. The second alternative would be not to approve the maintenance agreement but to modify or delete some of the work the City performs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the staff recommendation that tho City Council approve the maintenance agreement as drafted. Changing the current agroomont or reducing the amount of maintenance done by the City could result in a lower lovol of service to the community, as the County's priorities on those highways are not always those of the City's. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of proposed maintenance agreement. WRIGHT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS Wright County Public Works Building Route No. 1 - Bo: 97-B Buffalo. Minnesota 55313 Jet. T.X. 25 and C.R. 138 Telephone (612) 682-7383 LETTER OF TRANSHMAL TO: J O �t r S''�+r� 4t z sw &�a RE:P../ We Are forwnrding herewith the following: of Copies Description DATE: q��111/1 Sheet Numbers WAYNE A. PINGAl50N. 1'.E High..y E.1p.- 682 73e8 DAVID K. MONTEBEILO. P.E A.dmnt High—, Engine 682.7387 RICHARD E. MARQUETTE R�ghl d w.y AS - 6827386 Dates Remarke: % naq.,•i Gv % Mcl T`<O, .ta4� Fly^ Sincerely, PC: �j Equal Opportunity / Al/irmgtiue Action Employer 0 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the City of Monticello ereinafter referred to as the "City" and the County o f Wright hereinafter referred j as the "County". WHEREAS, Chapter 162, Minnesota Statutes, permits the County to designate certain roads and streets within the City as County State Aid Highways, and WHEREAS, the City has concurred in the designation of the County State Aid Highway within its limits as identified In County Board's resolutions of August 28, October 8, November 5, December 3, December 27, 1957 and January 7, 1958, and WHEREAS, it is deemed to the best interest of all parties that the duties and responsibilities of both the City and the County as to maintenance on said County State Aid Highways to be clearly defined, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED with regard to said County State Aid Highway maintenance: That the City will be responsible for routine maintenance on the following highways. MAINT. PLAN ROAD SEGMENT MILES COST/MI.+ TOTAL COST* 1. CSAH 75 From Willow St. to E. Jct. CSAH 39 3.74 758.27 2,835.93 (Includes four lane portion.) 2. CSAH 39 From City Pub. Works Bldg. to 0.32 189.57 60.66 W. Jct. of CSAH 75 4. CSAH 58 From T.H. 25 to CSAH 75 0.465 3,401.77 1,581.82 4. CSAH 59 From Walnut Street to CSAH 75 0.234 3,401.77 796.01 TOTAL 1-759 ,274.42 That the routine maintenance shall consist of the following: (Maint. Plan) 1. (CSAH 75) - Snow and ice removal 2. (CSAH 39) - 252 of the snow and ice removal 4. (CSAH 58 6 59) - Patching, crack -sealing, drainage maintenance, snow and ice removal, and tree trimming b brush removal. ,*Based on 1989 average annual costs. That when the City dooms it desirable to remove snow by hauling, it shall do so at its own expense. The City shall also be responsible for all snow and ice removal on sidewalks and other boulevard related maintenance outside the curb or street area. That the County will be responsible for all other matatenaace . That the City shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the County and all of its agents and employees of any form against any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of whatever nature or character arising out of or by reason of the execution or performnace of the work provided for horoin to be performed by the City. It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of the City and all other employees of the City engaged in the porformanco of any work or servie ee required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall be considered employees of the City only and not of the C^ounty; and that any and all claims that may or might arise under Workman's Compensation :t of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission oa the part of said City employees while so engaged on any of cho work or services provided to be rendered heroin shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the City. That the County shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the City and all of its agents and employees of any form against any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of :tions of whatever nature or character, whether at lav or equity, arising out of or by reason of the execution, omission or performance of the work provided for herein to be performed by the County including, but not limited to, claims made arising out of maintenance obligations of County, engineering, design, taking or inverse condemnation proceedings. It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of the County and and all other employees of the County engaged in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall be considered employees of the County only and not of the City; and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the workman's compensation act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said County employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall be the sole obligation and respousibility of the County. That in December of 1991 , the City shall receive payment from the County for their work. This amount shall be based on the 19 90 average annual cost per mile for routine maintenance on Municipal County State Aid Highways. The average annual cost per mile will reflect only those costs associated with the areas of routine maintenance for which the City is responsible. ADOPTED: 19_ ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council of said City on , 19_. City Clark APPROVED AND ACCEPTED: Name of City COUNTY OF Chairman of the Board ATTEST: County Coordinator C (t) 9 Council Agenda - 9/23/91 5. Consideration of replacing underground heat pipes at the Citv's wastewater treatment plant. (J.S.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This item was last formally discussed by the City Council in October of 1989. As some of you recall, the heat pipe system, which supplies the various buildings with hot water for unit heaters from the main boiler, was plagued with continual leak problems. In 1985, the City made repairs to approximately 1/4 of the system at a cost of $10,000. In 1988, we disconnected a portion of the heating pipes serving the aeration building due to severe leaks. In 1989, OSM designed a replacement system replacing the pipes at their location, which is from 7 feet to 9 feet beneath the ground surface. The estimated cost for repairs was $55,000. At that time, it was the consensus of the City Council to table any action on heat pipe replacement until City staff could develop additional information on lower cost alternatives. During the winter of 1989 to 1990, at the suggestion of Councilmember Blonigen, we looked at the possibility of installing large quantities of stop leak in the system. We worked out a dosage of a stop leak chemical with the firm of Loop, Beldon, 6 Porter. This firm does the technical repair of the boiler at the wastewater treatment plant and repairs various types of hot water and steam boiler systems. The stop leak chemical worked quite well, although some problems were encountered with plugging of the heating system itself. The firm of Loop, Boldon, 6 Porter indicated that this was a one- time corrective action, and we should not attempt to use an additional dose, as we would more than likely cause damage to the entire system. During the late winter of 1990 to 1991, the heating pipes again began to leak causing the system to lose significant amounts of water. The leaks caused two general concerns: 1) The introduction of fresh cold makeup water to the system at rates of one to two times the capacity of the system per day causes high inefficiencies in the heating system both from a cost standpoint and from a heating capability standpoint; 2) In addition, the boiler treatment chemicals, which are used to protect the boiler and the heating system from corrosion, are washed away and must be replenished. These boiler treatment chemicals aro very expensive, in the neighborhood of $500 per barrel; and when losing 300 gallons of water a day, a barrel of boiler treatment chemicals does not last long. During this summer, we looked further into other options. The L first option looked at was a heat pump system that would recover heat from the wastewater itself and use that energy Council Agenda - 9/23/91 and convert it into heat for the building. The firm of Rieke, Carroll, and Muller, who have installed this type of a system in other wastewater treatment plants, agreed to do a small feasibility study for us at no cost considering the installation of a heat pump in the main control building back fed to the nearby equalization building. A section option using a separate high -efficiency gas-fired boiler to heat the same two buildings was also studied. So it would be anticipated under these scenerios then that we would replace the piping between the digester building and the thickner building and heat that building with heat from the main boiler. The results of the feasibility study indicated that the heat pump recovery system was too large to install efficiently in existing space, and the time needed to recover high up -front costs was prohibitive. In addition, the installation cost and piping cost for a high energy efficient gas fired boiler, although lower than the heat pump system, had a much higher operational cost and, therefore, was also cost prohibitive. The main boiler is fired by methane gas produced on the site most of the time. This led us back to considering a low cost alternative for replacing or repairing the heating lines at the treatment plant. The anticipated high costs for pipeline replacement were due to the depths of the existing system, the number of obstacles encountered when digging to that depth, and the need to encase the piping system in some type of conduit that was easily accessible for future maintenance or repairs. City staff and PSG decided that one approach may be to install a very shallow heat pipe system only two feet in the ground. The heat pipe system would also include an air lino needed for each one of tho buildings and would be placed in a treated plywood and treated lumber built containment system lined with high density styrofoam insulation. Using this type of containment System and digging at a shallower depth is expected to save thousands of dollars. In addition, we looked at abandoning the existing piping system in place so as not having to go down and excavate around the pipe and conduit cluttered areas of the treatment plant. Our original thoughts indicated that we would be using seamless steel schedule 40 pipe, either threaded and coupled or welded in place. We were loary of going back to a copper system, as all the joints had failed; however, the firm of Loop, Boldon, 6 Porter, OSM's mechanical engineer, as well as The Goodin Company, a local pipe supplier, indicated our first preference should be copper with a braised alloy joint, secondly they would rocommond woldod seamless schodulo 40 stool, and lastly threaded stool. After comparing the costa, we decided that it would be in our boat interest to follow the recommendations of these throe firms and stick with the copper Council Agenda - 9/23/91 with a braised alloy joint, not the original solder joint. The copper piping was only a few hundred dollars more, and the ease of handling as well as the minimal amount of time to braise rather than cut and thread or weld was significant. In addition, the copper pipe would not need to be coated with rust proofing. Based upon the new scenerio and a team effort between PSG and the City, it is our estimate that we should be able to replace all of the heating lines at the wastewater treatment plant for an out-of-pocket cost of between $7,700 and $10,000. This is about the same cost as our repairs were back in 1985, and less than 208 of our 1989 estimate for replacement rather than abandonment of the old pipe. The following is an estimated cost of each section of the heat pipe replacement. ESTIMATED COSTS WWTP HEAT PIPE REPLACEMENT Excavation (est.) $ 800 Plumber/pipefitter 16 hrs @ $40/hr 640 Coring (control bldg) 300 Pipe, fittings b valves 4,150 Treated plywood, treated 2x8, insulation 6 mise. materials 1,800 TOTAL $7,690 Since much of the above work will be done in the area of the control building near the south wall, it is recommended at this time that we also remove the 1,000 gallon fuel tank that supplies fuel for the emergency generator. This tank is now approximately 30 years old, as it was the original fuel oil tank for the first boiler at the treatment plant built in 1960. It is not known to leak at this time; but if a leak did occur, it could be extremely costly to the City. The estimated cost for removal of the tank by a contractor certified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to do the work would be $1,450. This, of course, Is assuming we find no leaks and we do not need remedial soil correction or testing. For the time being, we would place a 265 gallon tank in the generator room and operate the generator from that and the existing 100 gallon day tank. We would then propose in the future to have an outside or inside tank with a capacity of at least 500 gallons to serve the generator for the future. Council Agenda - 9/23/91 The total estimated cost then at the treatment plant for the heat pipe replacement and the tank removal is estimated to be around $11,500. Our estimate for the heating system replacement in the 1991 budget under the sewer improvement fund was $40,000. The current balance in the sewer improvement fund is $80,000. Revenue from hookups in the sewer improvement fund for 1992 are expected to be higher than usual due to the construction of the new elementary school. There is adequate funds to do this work as well as other proposed items except the major dechlorination project due by 1993. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to authorize City staff to work with PSG for replacing the heat pipe system at the wastewater treatment plant at an estimated cost of $7,700 to $10,000 and to remove the existing 30 -year-old fuel tank at the site at an estimated cost of $1,450. 2. The second alternative would be not to replace the heat lines at this time but to look for an additional alternative. City staff has researched this long enough to know that our other alternatives are limited due to high cost. 3. The third alternative would be to replace the heat pipes at this time but to leave the underground fuel tank for the generator in place and remove it at a later date. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Kolsie McGuire, PSG's project manager for the wastewater treatment plant, that the City Council authorize heat pipo replacement and tank removal as outlined in alternative #1. SUPPORTING DATA: Letter from OSM. A Orr sUden =Irr- 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 September 19, 1991 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 Engineers Architects Planners surveyors Mr. John Simola Public Works Director 250 E. Broadway Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant - Heating Hot Water Revisions No. 1748.00 Dear John: We have further reviewed the proposed design for the heating hot water revisions and have some concerns that I would like to express. From the standpoint of pressure, temperature and service, the proposed threaded, schedule 40 steel pipe system is appropriate. Since the piping may periodically be exposed to ground water, 1 need to reiterate our concern over corrosion potential. The piping needs to be wrapped or coated to prevent any corrosion, and extreme care must be used such that the protective coating is not removed during installation of the piping and tightening of the joints. The connections between the steel pipe and dissimilar materials should be protected by the use of a dielectric coupling, unions or isolating flanges. This will prevent corrosion due to electric potential between the dissimilar metals. Some alternatives that you may want to consider in lieu of the schedule 40 steel pipe would be to use copper with a brazed joint, fiberglass, or a RICWIL preinsulated piping system that would be drainable, dryable, and could be furnished with a leak detection system. The RICWIL system is similar to what is now in place but a selection of piping materials and joining methods is available. These alternatives would help to alleviate corrosion concerns. The alternative materials may require that outside personnel perform the installation and may prove to be more costly than the proposed system. With the use of the RICWIL system, the proposed wooden pipe trench would not be required. We reviewed the use of ductile iron as an option, but it is only available in sizes 3 inch and larger. PVC would not be appropriate due to the temperature of the system. roam CVPI-111 t mruye 0 Mr. John Simola September 19, 1991 Page 2 Other considerations of the proposal are to make sure that the insulation selected be appropriate for the temperature of the piping system so that it does not melt. If this were to occur, the plywood may delaminate. The insulation should also be non-compressible as the piping will be supported by it and will have to withstand pipe movement as it expands. The insulation should also resist absorbing of water so that it won't lose its insulating value. The piping should be anchored at the building entrance by anchor bolting angle irons (welded or bolted to the pipe) to the concrete wall. A seal should also be provided at the wall penetration to prevent water from entering the building. 1 have enclosed copies of our specification for dielectric unions and seals for the wall penetration. We do not currently have cut sheets for these products but they should be available from the piping suppliers. If you have any qucbtiuns or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. fUjes- Mechanical Engineer sw 091991 Ldg c: GPB BA W JJs File Lt - 2.03 DIELECTRIC PIPING CONNECTORS A dielectric union shall be provided at every junction of two dissimilar metal pipe materials except where isolating flanges are used for the piping systems hereinafter shceduled. When joining larger diameters of dissimilar metal/material pipe, use insulating coupling equal to Dresser Style 39 or Rockwell 1416. When different diameters are joined, use insulating -reducing couplings. Dielectric unions shall be equal to Model "F" or Model 'E" screwed unions rated at 250 psi for pipe sizes 2-1/2' and over, all as manufactured by Epco Sales, Inc. All dielectric unions shall be provided with dielectric gaskets suitable for continuous operation at fluid temperatures to 240 degrees Fahrenheit. 2.01 MECHANICAL SLEEVE SEALS:'_ Where called for in subsequent Sections or where shown on the drawings, provide modular mechanical seals consisting of interlocking synthetic rubber links shaped to continuously fill annular spaces between pipes and sleeves. Connect with bolts and pressure plates which cause the rubber element to expand. The units are designed to provide a watertight seal and electrical insulation. These units shall be "Link Seal" as manufactured by Thunderline Corporation. 0 rleke canon mullet suoefate% Inc. y@er9 tects tard surveyors mo, oppo knty c7PAZ'f June 24, 1991 Mr. John Simoln Director of Public Works Monticello City Hall P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: New Heating System Monticello WWTP Control Building RCM No. 16520.00 1 Dear Mr. Simols: We have analyzed what we feel are the two most practical options to provide heat for the Monticello wastewater Treatment Plant Control Building. The two options are a heat pump and a pulse boiler system which would be located in the control building basement. Both systems would connect directly into the existing hot water heating system eliminating the need for an external heat source. We have tabulated below a few comparisonsof the two systems. Installation Cost $49,000.00 $23,500.00 Annual Operational Cost' $1,980.00 $4,915.00 COP/Efficiency 2.93 91% Weight 3,655 lbs 872 lbs Approximate Size 34•Wx126'Lx62'11 19'Wx40`Lx42'li • The annual operating costs are based upon information we received from you at the time of our site visit -- 317,944 B'1'Ulf heating equipment load, gas costs @S5.33/MCF, and electrical costs @$0.02846/ K W I1. The heat pump has a lower annual operating cost, however, the installation cost is much higher due to the basic cost of the unit -- $23.000.00 for the heat pump vs, 55.000.00 for the boiler. The installed cost of the heat pump assumes that the existing effluent writer line entering the building can be used. If a new line to and from the effluent water source is needed, additional costs would be incurred. Also, the weight and physical size of the unit may prevent its installation. The boiler has a higher annual operating cost, but the installation cost is much lower than the heat pump. Also, the space and weight features make it more Tensible to use. A 3' CPVC pipe can be used for both the boiler combustion air Intake and exhaust. t0901 rod cirdo drive box 130 mavtetonka, nnnnesota 55343 612.935.6901 r FM Mr. John Simola June 24. 1991 Page Two When comparing the two systems, the pulse boiler is a more practical solution to the heating system problem. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Paul Martinsen, P.E. Manager, Mechanical/Electrical Engineering PM/ch Council Agenda - 9/23/9) Consideration of study for public works facility expansion. (J.S.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the direction of City Council, the public works facility building committee, consisting of Councilmember Blonigen, Councilmember Fyle, myself, and Street/Park Superintendent, Roger Mack, met to more define the issues to be studied with the public works facility expansion. After meetings and tours of the public works facility in the City of Champlin, the park and rec facility in the City of Anoka, and the maintenance shop/street storage building and park facility in the City of Golden Valley, the building committee narrowed the focus of the study. The basic focus Is that the existing site has sufficient room for expansion of the public works department for the near and foreseeable future. Once the site nears or reaches capacity, it Is likely that the water/sewer collection department would relocate, possibly to the industrial park near the reservoir. Therefore, the study will focus entirely on the existing site and existing buildings. The study will look at the possibility of joining the office of public works and garage for the water/sewer collection system with the existing public works shop under one roof. In addition, It will look at the possibility of adding onto the existing bu llding or buildings individually. City staff developed and the building committee reviewed a list of special items to be considered for the public works facility expansion. Those items list building considerations and site considerations. It is proposed that the firm of TKDA reveal all available data with the public works staff and the City Council building committee and define facility requirements for current and future needs and identify options. The building committee and TKDA would present the City Council with conceptual floor plans, elevations, and cost data for the facility expansion. The now proposal from TKDA is enclosed for your review. The cost remains the same at $2,750 plus travel, miscellaneous computer services if needed (added since first proposal), and copying costa. Although the focus of the study changed, the study will now result in a much more direct and accurate picture of the proposed expansion after considering current/futuro noods at a specific site. Pote x Brosak has indicated that the entire cost of the study would be credited should TKDA be selected as the firm to design the facility when we roach that point in the decision- making process. C Council Agenda - 9/23/91 It is expected that the study will take approximately two months and will require several meetings of the staff and building committee over the next two months. Additionally, depending upon the location of the actual buildings, we may find it necessary to have some soil borings taken in order to determine if any special building coats are needed to develop foundations in certain areas. This investigation would be done at additional cost through one of the City's soil testing contractors. Prior to going ahead with such extra work, we would get estimates and ask the City Council for authorization. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Gr 1. The first alternative would be to authorize the City to contract with TRDA for a public works facility expansion study at a lump sum cost of $2,750 plus certain expenses as listed. 2. The second alternative is not to perform the study at this time or redirect the focus of the study as the Council desires. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of City staff and the public works facility building committee that the City Council authorize the study to be performed by TRDA as outlined in alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING nATA: Copy of the proposal from TRDA; Copy of the public works bullding consideration list and public works site consideration list. 7 T/y TO TZ. RING. D V ILLI. ANDE f.BON iiiiDA. AND M/OCIATE& INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 35m AhWWAN NATONAL BANK GNWNO BARO PAUL. MD114W A MI Dt.IM September 18, 1991 Mr. Richard Wolfsteller City Administrator City of Monticello PO Box 1147 Monticello, MIN 55362 Re: Proposal to Provide Architectural and Engineering Services for Schematic Plans and Budget Estimates for Monticello Public Works Department Expansion at 901 and 909 Golf Course Road Monticello, Minnesota Gentlemen: Pursuant to communications with Public Works Staff and the City Council Building Corruninee, we propose to provide architecturaVengineering services to the City of Monticello in connection with the above -referenced project, hereinafter called the Project. Our services will be provided in the manner described below, subject to the tenni and conditions set forth in the attached "General Provisions of Architect -Engineer Agreement", dated January, 1986. The City of Monticello is in need of an expansion of its Public Works Facility to rneet current and future needs of its growing community. TKDA proposes to work with the City of Monticello in the preparation of a schematic plan and image for expansion of the Public Works Facility and to prepare an estimated budget for the implementation of the expansion. Mr. Richard Wolfsteller City of Monticello September 18, 1991 Page 2 r 7 i • ; • ala . r..: Based on our understanding of the Project, we propose to provide the following services: A. Part 1 - Schematic Plans I. Review the information put together by the Public Works Staff and the City Council Building Committee. 2. Define facility requirements for current and future needs. The facility requirements reviewed will include: Buildings Parking Outdoor Material/Equipment Storage Expansion Potential Work Areas Indoor Material and Equipment Storage Personnel Areas 3. Review the requirements with City Staff and identify development options based on the following criteria: Construction Costs Operational Costs Expandability Adaptability Health/Safety 4. Review all available documentation of the existing structures for their structural systems and abilities as relates to the potential for incorporating them into a facility Cexpansion. Mr. Richard Wolfsteller City of Monticello September 18, 1991 Page 3 5. Prepare and review with the Building Committee several proposed land uses and building footprints for the Public Works site. 6. Prepare conceptual floor plans and elevations, and review with the Building Committee. 7. Prepare a building construction budget estimate. B. Part 2 - Presentation 1. Assist the City Staff with presentation of the proposed schematic plans and estimate to the City Council for review. C. Part 3 - Additional Services If authorized by you, we will furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed below which are not considered as basic services under this proposal. Additional Services shall be billable on an Hourly Rate basis as defined in Article 3 of the General Provisions, and such billings shall be over and above any maximum amounts set forth in this proposal. 1. Presentation of the proposed building to civic groups or other additional presentations to the City. 2. Preparation of Final Plans and Specifications for construction purposes. 3. Construction Administration services. We would expect to star our services promptly upon receipt of your acceptance of this proposal and to complete Part 1 and 2 services within 2 months. O Mr. Richard Wolfsteiler City of Monticello September 18, 1991 Page 4 •t•ul'o► Y•♦ Compensation to TKDA for services tendered under SECTION 11, Parts 1 and 2 of this Proposal shall be on a Lump Sum basis as defined in Article 3 of the Generai Provisions, in the amount of $2,750.00. In addition to the foregoing, TKDA shall be reimbursed at cost for the following Direct Expenses when incurred in the performance of the work: A. Travel and subsistence (actual mileage x $0.275 per a-.;icj B. Computer services ($12.00 per hoar) C. Identifiable reproduction and reprographic costs (estimated at $150.00) When the Project proceeds into the Design and Construction Documents Phase, we are willing that the above fee be credited to the Project A/E Fee. This proposal is made with the understanding that you will provide the following services relating to the Project which are in addition to those enumerated under Article 8 of the General Provisions: A. Provide soil borings for the above referenced site. 4• ►IY:: yY 4YY' ►Y We thank you for the opportunity to make this proposal and are willing that this letter and attachments constitute a contract between us upon its signature by an authorized official of the City of Monticello and the return of a signed copy to us. O Mr. Richard Wolfsteller City of Monticello September 18, 1991 Page 5 This proposal will be open for acceptance until October 25, 1991, unless the provisions hereof are changed by us in writing in advance of the above stated date. Sincerely, James E. Voyen, P.E. Vice President -Treasurer ,46 7P � Peter M. Brozek, ALA Project Manager ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO By Title Date JEV:PMB:mrk ATTACHMENTS: GENERAL PROVISIONS L01 TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED General Provisions of Architect -Engineer Agreement ARTtCUI 1. GENERAL Ths Gomwo Pranuau an ~ma tow uma In mm qulm mm L Nmn fyde Ag1ew11 ' delreert Tib. K'stg DuwA Andersen ora AwoDwL In• arDareoud A MM'"O 's CQpdaDdn. Nvianaf st Warrseouo TKDIL Ord an OWNER. wnwe n the OWNER NQegw MDA D fsorrde cram Ar- cnnedluni Ahab Erigmearng srrca an a Prgom As us" hwain, ole twm'VINAWOWnS y' mWS W(1)me TKOA PMOOM Letter onKh aedunw me LOW Agree"I upon Its sweparicso ay me OWNER. (31 mer Gerwel Prorurene and (T any a>wflaa Euawrm J e.d tray were pen d one And tow Meme O=ffwLL Wim raapod b ale Oder d eYOerasderlCa any oOCned Ea7nM0 sW gcarn filer Mae General p PwwaN and ole Low Aignwnws NW gram am dry Bfedted Ea• m ns dna Maw oo ww pnms m ARTICL87. PEMOCPSONICA aternsdthNAQnwnenl trda OMrbrrAcea solid wVIUMIeerNW w w r /ORr in iota Liar AglealwLL In dud stn Ma any r AW Bum a ft"DOOdOneed,mAAmum deyfrteA arrogirrepowal4 w balmN c Liar Agl MWM how dMN sweated N aytoOdsOon d wrotdany end dorterm pNdglew d me Prgw m addlbance Wlt to scrAcoe w brm m me LOW Ade► men or try EAmmts ebclw momm ARMLL 1 COMPENSATION TO TXDA A CpnpwvmbmoTKDADrewraeeorcroselnMAQlewlem" w m e Lunro Sum odes rlddr ed ttateq RM DW w d=WaM n da Liles AWMw WU and w neuanaw eeedme6 I. A Lived Sum rtrrro0 d Dsytnertt IN Tolaws swNew Nt0 apply lo W or Ora d a wars emoe wtlele TItOA'S dud syn w rrdlly dined tab sonar du WI at adlr required toeCDanMw suer dab on as N"ala art a raaeonawe cow" of accuracy. TIN OWNER Mae mead npmuy patymerne o MDA wslun W asre a ape a irr,orce ate ori m ed ewmied OLRwthOs d Or OMM Of TKOWS orwcw 2 An NOury Rw mrned of payrnars b TKDA'S wuew Nee app lyo w or mod a wn Loon wnwe TImL9 ass oma wweduy ri/ate0 artdbf wrtwe0le WI a wbn reawee oaobanpwn arch mad ora w LeaAnwd.en sly reudtealedepee d amort• Under eel Nam RON r AMM ON peynrwa TXDA sad be pad a Me Marius neua+A, on m posted by TKDA Nds01 OW20M ne rrr An nam wln0 rweamtlledb east wpp/ee II=I f lowing Mom " include amewimm do salery cum ovinall "~. "MAI ago1w11�MdNwfrasetr Bnd pNAewrorw %a Ares edteaae alae w kerww br MDA IAOWNER upon rears. In addnNn o rile bnlwertp. MDA ahs w,Omb nes s ow bf Ireland. DkeC Eapenw wow eLLVtse m M pelbrtlo cea Me waA: fill Thvw and sudwwNce. (bl comwtw wr.rest (cl outside woo=" w ane tecfticw wMcr wan cow wrinta0 w da amour baled Mpe OA r pow'. (d) Indrwars NOKO fdlen end repggrOPM CNM The OWNER Mau new mamN paarleM b MDA wNM w dM d ammo Ir We Dow an ow p mon "Mile n GC=dsftce wan re ab" crArgee b anode prdstdee and awrso mcwad p' ads aeornpanw by Buapdrmg awdwtea w reduced. B TMQWNER rreo«naoelartu tfasawdr ram urrknw OWNER nCtdlM TKOA n wMRQ d Ira Oanrdu W ism ml is alleged le be'e ner.9 .don 15 dtya fan ea dWO d Irrrca n.rtdcn cad ape Medlaputwd ricin wdl renunt undue uall reedned Or the pemeL All 8=W= unNA Orion 00dsyatrnewdANdarg"i. saniwLarged ossrNnmarpe a 114% M maNm a me nim mum amour W tipend by IOM rnra7rMr is Awa In e0alnon. TKDA mty. alar Qnmg Lown days written noca m eN OWNER, auwn d arkcse undo MaAgnirnro untl MOA no down Osis in Nd for all ameurb Men due for rnrcaa aDeress And cn6rges. ARrICUZ a. EXTRA WORK IIMDA a d to aansN eW srry was tltey rase assn dkecmri p wrbrm a depend me SCOM of me AgroffAM Of OW me IMI Of efon rsoaureO LOulloendy emede dos eernwse due acrerag ld tprupws and 0W soy tatmOles am oak lair ani pbhppy redly the OWNER d mm a0. EmA vera, ed igmr mnpwrwdm b Luna and aaleneron of dune far dmoN KM ones became ay a Supa«nenw ad W Agreement entered Ird tell Poo" prow o prom"grrm any am wore or Missouri earrdmjma ARrl=$. ABANDONMOR, CKAN6H OP PLAN AND TFAYMATION EdlerRony res me rgrt btrmmre mNAQRWrnM won WW drys ora ton nwm In r ddroon. the OWNER may in any rnla reduce the scow d daApewnrLLSud ed®onnamwcanwwbrthm■wMertrotce hanmeCWNER b MDA In to Lowe of umaaOWed GkOuouanrer OW49 n adope or Owge0 catstlOMa ea AgMerllem nein LIDO w oumanaou0 upon wrr dsya ~ ndaee as wenriee abtMa IMO eVoW at arrtanew. all addpnerre finished Of umrnereri. Pr§MM dy TKOA undo mal Agrernon onlop be made avrlsale by MOA ad me OWNER pursuers to Article S AM more OW w nd Nrmr oaigsdw Of ale OWNER D MDA under me AWONnoM Lada b palmers d ArMuflts dee and 0" b sae Ilerndrtnted AM UPNM a maned W the doe and Wne d termination. cornl0uled in aCcadamfi with the OrMspns of A mC1 0 end me LWW Agit MWM In Ane Mrs at ■ reader in sopa Of Me PMPC wOrk. MOA Owl w DW for th wont wMdrnMd alp =Dona meumq an Is, Ptgad wars thus reduced One for any ownpwm and aptrtOdned Work to wwh peymerll no logo pat meds, mrrputAe In AppdmAnde rum me Drove*" of Aftrde 7 and se LOW AglWROM ARTICL/ 6 DISPOSITION OP PLANS. REPORTS AND OTHER DATA Al se tale a t cis" or urtrnaprt at the work. MOA OWI MOM weltsele b on OWNERR, as rnem dnlcsP repos reeouroe neeefnAou W do/OANntarb peftsMrtp OOlewara d b rile PtdrtL AO NUCIr dOantler0 w logo IINenOeOattpreaePmIou a, arip CO pMurA rile OWNER= datwtm alenndte d as Pgep a Ano deter pr4ea Any reuw wrtltat wmoun wNXMadm d edaOaum to, TKDA to me epaadld oUn=e mound• se will be w OWNERS am nox aro wwowa 9aary d 16" =pow is b MDA.ln rine MGBM UW OW NER wet kdW " Mp and had nei ntAw MOA nam any and M Lits dr lane to Imre pis alWnp out d such muse, .rich a no apeCaMJ N "~' --Di or autndreed by MDA, ARTICIJ T. OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE ST PURCHASE ORDER In Ileu d to on session to signing me rowa0ounce Diane an rile LOW AQroo rnent. Me OWNER nley asec" Is, cvMW Or wimp t purcrism orcr r0neri a • duty suchOrtap rtOre ow"IlM . Such ournalr Mar rWl n. oorperele a rewrote rile lame and aploallrale d M Agrwmenl. In me reale d eepMka deA the toms and eandNhne of this Aprawnwo and OrOw mrWrw n W LinfNEA9 purdlew dew. VON -sew m101ttdu or Me A"reenler Nal "darn. NOWIthMtmrp any MOOMM rima Doo- we"W OMea WaIM nee/rwses Llprera ntplea winds a TKDA.© JANUARY lar AJMnCLF& OWNER'S RESga0MSMIUM A. To Damm MDA to Irenanh the mwvetm rwaUw" nerw,M,, the C`'NER snag suaoh,, n w -w amesho SraUOMa am m0wweg aro a m MOA: 1. Pmavoo all nenoary mmhnoeal regwaalq it, roawrwlwrae m nrcMd"" for onmry Plugs m d we +ort. 2. Desgnae n wmmg, A OMM o m m OWNER'S reaoorpm.we tome mmpea m fie swvco mole rr(4ere0,pmw ala Agrewwrl. Suen 0woon Shia hevr wormy to ttrnn m i'jvucba o, hem. TMUUM nr mcbm 1"WhIllOw. mtrmnt ono dorms OWNERS Oowoa wan roam m MONS oohm r 1 Fuman. AS reouwed Atr Owmlmehw of MOAS ooevrC"400te0 aro amt otoewwd muwwlao n 00 Lam Agrewnwe or any Eaaeg aaaroa Meso), ago DMICI 0 ay a awlrmo d othw hnauaahg .oats Iptumopn, mr baregs prmwy� oMaNOWttiOesmdaa d0rw rrymwgrmNlec tM gowromakw moveyA IQhOr®ry tam all alaasmaleof suraim ilmm m ell eaNaXnIIC apaaarlm Oro maamrola'a♦rwomasasoaarmeomag;www w=sages mwA all imam m11NO was wcdenh Dmom m eoverwo 1, rum. d-vah IDwOWSPOW WOuDWY Saarys: 0lmo1y ar vVilona mm pg, area all amsr nip uo NAOhaarc ana allow maces alta halt corsrad in that Low Agrrmrrm or wIT Eahwm aslra nwsm s. Propos waeem m oM them; 40 aavown tar MDA m ohm upon ouatayaa+ermhaw+rro oraa.nym+amwedm Osrmrrn roam S Ac o liaman awl Paw apsnCsa or ommvm own" to cam wt n80e12rh, oawo sum all rlegppmpha %plan aalwovm aMow, rag ham all gavemwrmr wewaoa nee" luroahm ah mor am Phaea who VKn a00 -o m all coning Ian allows as awy of mrnrsrry row Cahmwmn of two Pmmm d Emm he au rrw.rm, amschaA an weya toeanaaaam all COW (10CU M Orrowro0 tom asawMQ wf TKOA, amen roots a w amrrwy, I1MUMM CMMMI a a Won o CANNER aorta ++oagesv mr gran aewrrlmon Amp rwpw n wmhy arcawa aw- raetrq atwrm wrWn r rosanmw tlnhs o o res m geese o0 ow• ncp d :9C.A OM Prones wrmwl ams m MOA what~ OWNER Ooeehrra m owewwoe aaaar.r Are of em dooMwwre im wmml tae acaroid mlurp d TKW9 ervlm a sees Sema n ilowaa %Gan MUMM CorelrCMSL CarmNm o a TKOA. 6 lft mm acwn. wain aaomma mmwaly, fuln"www wimp. SA" -PINION 0-03101t NmwrtmGramm w am woo ma m m etmoowwme of wry wars axww mww uhaw the Prom q Prwviwr %urn same nehg, mommin om am mew mam all n• Spmotaaroreq swva>emnoyprsAapa la ttrPhueel warn wqr mewes m OWNER may MMM a MDA M" ro smear 1► aures wan mous m Isga wanift MMMLmg m Oft Pr4em mitis q SM iNi hey a rwsea of Conuumil . such suamg orvpo u OWNER may realms to awmnrn Mw Jew wnm Oumom any Cpm aaaa too uew7 ins mwwmo a" unaw me conatueaw comem AM Such nma.aaal eros. m OWNER may mal ge, m aacw mn Irm Co-vcm"s) m aeMN,rg wnn oM lee No IGguw mA a- apwfv mar a Grow apowallaw to ew hrrnMag top Oermm. eg the Sara m Prarar'nmo'aMwrhgasea ApopllCOGro mr rd warp PFVOM olrn0 a mourm w"ch oh, owwon m Oce Prwlaa ii, P'Worrahar sswvwor. nimr,sw.aamarloY ag aro bNe+w me LWW Aghownwo a wh Eampm aarraod hrroa fl MDA antl araetMootOnlymwsrOZprayamamwronadas aammat %mhwww W IN OWNER. n MOA lam ism Arty eaammtan Ile nWM DY the OWNER y n rma a a NMKWue pr no PINOM HmA WO womaK mor Gro OWNER. ARTCLA A OPINIONS OP COST Omhl of aaamhe harem pini, axtwuamn all. laormw e000w o, gapodyW M*L*cwanhe rmpom OF ammo sOuwm w" uneww awpwwaaw a Oporoao too MOAN.M=OM paaAMla, n do LOW Aymnon a AM Esnbm OU&43 hwotu M m to now M ao b000 a MDA'S emww+orMauWnaamlewoeepnrwe TI(DA'$bgw OalOe 5' 1 m Awl wOwrrrhCro all rN(Neallap aagn aonurana 11 w rsmgn,e o. owAMN00MDAmoryaroremmmoawaraMrawamMEOW awwrrhore a rw,e♦ Apnwlrp eYalwg a arw+hwu aamwGraa de. MI PS' NXIMIMIN at awww00 aw am" war all ell emanon a wY leach m wlmiepu[oa, a aLiuer(i, a ware mMowmrme0 m tftum a MOW$ em awhw». Sago a WAMN, be spreutwhs Vho iamb► len a miV VUCnM a aCOWsalah. ACCOrdelyy. MM tom mgwnnre MIN Pmamw ams a wow toe wares aa0ww*mPN twv nCYhatllewwm ewpuol"a awaim wramaoa Oy MDA to OWNER hwauMw ARRtW IQ CON3rRUCTSON PHASE SERVICES OWNER oCawotgm mm a a antmarY mr erowiw a eMpnewwro u'amor,saeor ewolwomoo, aro 11m3" d orawngo aro 5aealk . Who al"00"Wrowman•remso daahwm m of ."c"" to ares." Qe Omtess aw vmh m aunng trio Eaapg all Cwavuc-" Pnmm a me Pm>tom (i) a h waw ell corpy the a=,-uw sol ru-snea all m n001N the who m a ffmrencm rSwalaa aumq am" aria cahmuc aa+hmyaeau egg n ewrw+aciron wan aalagrlaal S,oaltum aa.aual �tema d nrmnm aro sau,Omem wa0aua by amen aria Cantrat9nal, fd1 In COhnaCaOh wan aaaO+rl a IrloO arewaga aria whole suo-Ms AM (6) m a rwue at Ana in rosaaoo m TKOAS Ceteatng ,n &"me at perlwrrlwn0 of aaecra Sat InMMMOMM Of urogulatum in such Qawmenamm. OWNER AQMM thin A MDA a m mrh mye0 to om ce aro m. Cauvu Paler ha»a� awl the PMOM KMAthe.MI oeoommolole t Z AMONNEA Anna eMM - ar AM hop r0MAJAM TKOAS t W..Ww asAoamaand anparal mhwmlomawnsamnianmepoloasreoM w wamewwngamrlmys'eaargphgana,aro,Nlbngmm,ahy,n- meoralma+, aarhboaarh. suoAatNaGrl aecaponn Sari arwwng a earl. ow appromP a mwaaamn ON SUCn *=MWMUM owaew a Crnea out OyCwNERaanen tioawgmrmpwa nemoarapvpnenoaoco ePUw M roe m e MOA (a TKOA'S onalo wo mutt mm or Corm UMI num lwwmYaamn manwrm m reoGraarw arm Oraawepna aarlorw all autyarmommmlary wncn rKDA rto uMeromna a me,mea uhaw the, ARTCU it. INSURANCE TKOA Ilya soon aro menton inwimme a O mc=n tram Choy 40' vwpw wwws' amawamm rig. gang for aamagm oscaun W OmN uryh, waudng Oenww inNh,. pexin a aseeog at cum of IM eM as MhpN000 w of Shy arrawh www Iran .uth ertmovws sM them call olmu m h ror demegm wecam" of hyury to w Seamon Of wham vw wq ma of use n w mng mw~. AIOG MOA MW Sac wo ell no h" Omm P heel pooh,,mfr M Mr 130011mm lmmClaulm aropgasa wtm"anCea crdraaprw oorcm Ca AM OV aril' f*MS a MIX snot Or 0IMM=ar warn MDA m togesy lyao N4AFar. MDA heroay tome oM maONNER get* w*agK mm TKDAnm mOIOm=ww a aamty(wean allwmoml mm wMwrorwa AM m WMM to nesonaay caws Burn uwmnca b Ctillh s Anaug out a Oho ar alho," a town m owwm mcwawa , aorwyol inauong out ria iwno 10 uwD ognum a rrowrtr ampym m mo p all amltthca. Imre Masa m IM iMagtgom, doow", aoate"". '""co h eh. rMamvoatgrhowuaataowewattitmwMMaa¢IGrwgacm. mmnws a OraarumamewNrg rmM,gf aVANmNf IwrwunMr Ito s00o rlormrq Alymoa.IM-1 gswmw ar dim" w"wnmawearlaroom v¢ap"."O.r "M lam AM& Chow corn ell raaOAmtp atpa; woo Yap.=0000 mon= o Or MCyaaea. realoroowa00 a Mooned, ACCwrarhgN, the OWNER nrway aVrar m gag roaApnex negtgww Grreaha mrorn �MwnNeNGrahwCAtaoarmOn rgaNnS TKOA, ig vmaaam omagea rgwm rra mlaNlwrm h %Nal aaenrn cep way Alco aA a M sauce loop e0 a r awwo 412Cri4196 ams m. Mftw a sena a po wra.13, w (M tl1 Moms naw rommeaw wag Noma to acs mduarM a amom ms n me -Dom The OWNER hurtle, sweet o aawro. ,rpemmN all Mm TKOA shea wwamm wMalow to" am amulmum hermom nam all much Whilam or aaaegeam fumpp coon mw mey M wrwugm Dy %had OPEN mom"ct Me aonACo0rW10e00o MDA pw,&AaN m the, Agee► own Naepoa M" gar mow me OWNER Mae ria W Om m,od mph Orngpq ma egw w TKOA tar M aawaaw moMmwa worn at eoNrac 0a"CUM aaction arum asaUawommcnwowvC rsn0ww',, amm" Sot aro door ell alwwac" a paps Mae, girwna pro wemNawMaM owrge ovsmsw phaswaphptlhdoe ntwvu+q aovamH see OreasOp n opt'aawtM tom EPA pMrta,w a erOwasER re• M' es ladle" oM hold havvill ton TKOA to aura AM wig ah Ngm Sarna a a awes pesos Nam aur of earn orwpanw awwees Cwawmg a 1AMMI KS will be tpamm to me OWNER uow muses. APrCLA M. ASSOONYEM Tela Aglsw+we. Oreg arortaga m trcvn ew pwsGrm ewwcs d IM ole. OVOM MmwOyra W all thrmNgh whom MDA gemma Som mgpNhao,.. ow Mal beawwwold. sow w no/lawrad wow me wmw Comm" of the OWNER. ARMU M CONTROLLMO LAW Ma AWN -we n m to 9MO.o W 0o war a one sow of M—... ARMUM NON•OMCRUMATION MOA wamrrapy wan too nutaom aApOWAD o wow, auto all local pwaL rawrroo aro owmatpns mu..g 0 roman mono Sha nmaeweenwrah. JANUARh tee{ (o/ PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING CONSIDERATION 1. Wash, paint, sandblast bay approx. 20 x 32, low maint. walls. 2. Metal working & welding room, separation with 2 -ton trolley hoist; central fabricating table S vent system. 3. Paint chemical & oil storage room with waste oil tank (state grant $5,000 only if management plan for public use approved by City Council). 4. Shop area: A. Min. 4 stalls built to handle 31 -foot long vehicles. B. Two hoists: 1. pickup 8,000# air 2. dump truck 54,000# elec/hyd 5. Press hose reel system A. 4 -hose system for lube B. 1 air 6. Door sizes min. 18 feet wide x 14 feet high. 7. Ceiling height, clearance for truck on hoist. 8. Heating system: Coryvac gas/possible outside fired wood supplementary heat. 9. Natural lighting in shop and wherever possible. 10. Windows that open. 11. Floor slopes, min. in shop area. 12. Drains: trench with send collections also drain at front of vehicles in shop area. 13. Room for specialized tools, manuals, and parts; secure with area for desk and phone. 14. Combination lunch and meeting room --current summer max. 16 people. 15. Restroom showers 6 lockers as required. Low maint. finishes. 16. Shop 6 work area 6 wash area separate from vehicle storage; difference heat zones. 17. Entrance to shop also from inside. 9/20/91 J C Public Works Building Consideration Page 2 18. Wood working area, lights, 6 power. 19. Brick, block, or stand-up panel construction, sandwich insulation. 20. Single building or multiple. 21. Relocate or demolish or sell pole building. 22. New fuel system above ground or state-of-the-art underground with adaption to two -card system. 23. No north doors if possible. 24. Future expansion designated. 25. Exhaust hose reels in shop. 26. Main OH door radio controlled. 27. Vehicle storage drive-through with parking both sides. Few, if any, posts. 28. Electrical outlets in vehicle storage. All conduit surface mount. 9/20/91 600 PUBLIC WORKS SITE CONSIDERATIONS 1. Traffic patterns 2. Concrete ramp or apron into building 3. Guard posts where necessary 4. Salt storage under cover 3 -sided, 100 tons 5. Sand/salt storage, under cover, 800 cu yds (plan for future) 6. Fence entire site 7. Screening to west and north for outside material storage and recycling area, wood chips compost (two 20 -cubic yard piles) 8. Pickup, etc. C Council Agenda - 9/23/91 7. Consideration of replacinq sewer jet truck and chassis. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: New federal laws require annual inspections of all commercial trucks, including city trucks, with a gross vehicle weight of 26,001 pounds or more. The annual inspections are to be done by certified inspectors at various stations located around the state. For those commercial or government entities having more than five heavy class vehicles, the law allows the company or government body to have its own certified inspectors. We have sent Al Gapinski and Tom Moores to certified inspector schools, and they are finishing up the Inspections of our fleet. Most of our vehicles need only minor work to bring them up to the safety standards required by federal law. The 1972 International cab and chassis under our jet truck, however, is a different story. The inspection revealed that the frame is broken and bowed, all four springs need replacement, and the two front tires do not have sufficient tread to meet federal standards. In addition, there are several smaller items that also include steering column replacement or repair. Just the springs and frame repair alone are estimated to cost $1,800. Total repairs could exceed $2,500 quite easily, and this is beyond the value of the cab and chassis. It is, therefore, necessary to look at a replacement. Since the jet unit itself may be due for replacement in the not -too -distant future, it is best to look at a used cab and chassis for this application. in preparation for the 1992 budget, we have looked at replacing one of our older snowplow trucks. The 1981 Chevrolot is underpowered and has been a troublesome unit for several years during heavy winter plowing and hauling. The 1978 International is beginning to rust and Is becoming loss and less dependable each year but is adequately powered and is currently a bettor snowplow truck than the 1981 Chevrolet. In addition, the 1981 Chevrolet plow unit was built utilizing equipment taken off the 1972 International. The dump body Itself is in extremely poor condition. Based upon the above data, City staff would like to propose to Council that we remove the box and wing from the 1981 Chevrolet and install the Bower jot on this cab and chassis. We would then like to spoc and bid a now snowplow truck to replace the 1981 Chevrolet for 1992. In the time frame between now end when the now truck arrives, we would be able to plow snow in an emergency utilizing the 1981 Chevrolet, as C we would keep r -ho plow and hydraulic system on this unit, as It has little valuo and may be used during an emergency. This would require that during that period of time we drain and Council Agenda - 9/23/91 protect the water system in the jet truck. The 1972 International truck, along with the box from the 1981 Chevrolet, would be used as trade-in on the new plow truck or sold outright. Very little value would be obtained from the sale of these units either way. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative is to authorize the City staff to utilize the 1981 Chevrolet cab and chassis for the sewer jet and to prepare specifications for a replacement snowplow truck. The estimated cost of a replacement snowplow truck is $55,000 less the sale of the 1972 International and box. The second alternative would be to authorize the City staff to utilize the 1981 Chevrolet cab and chassis for the sewer jet but to delay plans for the purchase of a rew snowplow truck. The 1981 Chevrolet would still serve as emergency backup for snowplowing operations during this interim time; however, its capabilities would be extremely limited without a wing, tailgate, sander, or sufficient payload for traction, and getting much sand/ salt in and on the jet could be detrimental to its Uperdtiuii. The third alternative would be to look into the Possibility of purchasing a used cab and chassis to utilize with the sewer jet and delay the purchase of a replacement snowplow truck. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director, Street Superintendent, and Sewer Superintendent that the City Council authorize staff to utilize the 1981 Chevrolet cab and chassis under the sewer jet and develop specifications for replacement of the 1981 Chevrolet snowplow truck as early as possible in 1992 as outlined in alternative M1. This would enable us to put the sower jet back in use in a relatively short period of time. Currently, the 1972 International under the sewer jet has boon rod -tagged and can only be moved off the public works property by means of a tow truck to conform with state and federal laws. The City and driver would be a risk if the unit Is driven in violation. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the vehicle inspection report for the 1972 International. C I hoteby Cotidy ihai file abave.niontioned voiticle is irl comphanco with Appondis G of 40 CCR 996,17 tiuipectru Srgualwo 1h1% lora COralbal with not too mal too sail inspection as astrnba0 I. ae Moam•sMo State Patrol REORDER FROA TILE 11INUESOTA TRL'CKI\G ASSOCIATION b12-686-7351 I tN5 UAtL�_ VEHICLE INSPECTION REPORT 2 /Ovlr nNAME 4i / / c C l LTJ 3 tYW Lttlnt c s ! SIAL 14,,l CAA �a'MQD 'e4l r: inn Nai•ur �� `� ' ::roll 4 MAKE 10 VIN i i tiRi +ll 17 Iii: Nl/ L1 ::1 all IJ Vlll it. i .At; T"YrOd ' J /dl 'r� IyZ tyPE CU.5S Ia COMM it ODOMETEn AEADJUG i81NSPECtOoo 1JDiSIRIC1120 COutily 71 !:15yEr:iOHS NAM! ,xyi�0 �Tl�, ,7-t ( 72 fiAZARDOUS22 h1AIEAlAI DECAL a Q 2A 11ME 25 LOC 110N /J� f f i!I S QCJ e si III e.:f' c g PASS FAIL PA55 FAIL I 0t ake System ^� 13A, Service Brakes 13 51 B, S100-9 Cotumn ❑ od I i Adjustment ❑ 121 C. Front Aalo Beam and All Com - (a ❑ 21 Pads ponents other titan Steering I® ❑ 0 Parking Brake Svsteni N ❑ D. Steering Gain Box Column ❑ ❑ C. Brake Drum ar Rotors Ie ❑ E. Pitman Arm ❑ O Srake Hose ❑ Ga F Power Steering 00 ❑ E Drake Tubing 19 ❑ G Sall and Socket Joints ca ❑ F Low PiessurerVocuum andira ❑ M H, lie Rods and Dray Links + An Warning Device pa ❑ 1 Nuts AY40 ❑ G Tioalor Proiocaon Valve ❑ CR J Steering System 09 ❑ 1/ Au Compressor . IY4 ❑ ❑ f Etocrnc Brakes 4 Suspension ❑ ❑ J Hydraulic Broke$ (including ❑ (9 A. Any U•8o(ta$1 :Ower Assist Over Hydraulic ❑ IV B Spring Assembiv ' and Engine Onve Hvdlatihc )v4❑ ❑ C Torauor Radius or Tracking i Boosted components ❑ ❑ KVacuum Systems ❑ ❑ L et aka Away Brakes an 11, prior g Frnmo / ❑ 99 A frame Members — 2 Como uhny Devrcua ❑ B tiro and Wheel Claaonre ❑ ❑ A Fdrh Whoels. and Mounting /.A Ll ❑ C AOlustobta Asle Assenihims ❑ ❑ 0 Pattie it—ItS• and Mounnny (Slating Subllarnesi and Lock. ❑ ❑ C Orawbm:lowborEye ing Devices ❑ ❑ D Drewbar'Towbar longue ❑ ❑ E Safety Devices ❑ (W ID inns ❑ ❑ F Saddle — Mount$ Iv.i ❑ ❑ G LocLrng Devices I I wheals and nuns CW ❑ A Lock or Side Amy ❑ rors y0a 9 Erhaust Sy$tem ❑ B Wit cis and Rime r ❑ CFasteners(Lugsl 4. Fool Sirstarn to ❑ D. Watds I@ ❑ A. Sucurement of lank 0 ❑ B Fuuf Cap ❑ 12. wrndaltidtd Glaring N4❑ ❑ C, Fuel Crossover Ptoiocuon CI ❑ 13. Windshield%Vipers and ❑ Iia S. tryhong Devices Washor•Doboslm fiii ❑ 6 Safe Loading and Secuisrnonl ❑ W 10, Rear Vision Mardis 4 7 Steering Mechanism W ❑ 15, Rear End Protection 19 ❑ A Slsonng Wheel Fina Play d.ashl QQ ❑ Is Bounty Installation I hoteby Cotidy ihai file abave.niontioned voiticle is irl comphanco with Appondis G of 40 CCR 996,17 tiuipectru Srgualwo 1h1% lora COralbal with not too mal too sail inspection as astrnba0 I. ae Moam•sMo State Patrol REORDER FROA TILE 11INUESOTA TRL'CKI\G ASSOCIATION b12-686-7351 Council Agenda - 9/23/91 a- Consideration of a resolution authorizinq preparation of Hart Boulevard storm sewer outlet feasibility study. (J.U.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: A number of factors have emerged in the past few weeks which give rise to the request that Council consider ordering a feasibility study which would analyze the design and cost alternative associated with managing storm water run-off that currently must pass through the Bondhus property on its trip to the Mississippi. Please see the attached map for a description of the watershed and storm sewer route. Factors leading to the feasibility study request: The City may continue to allow the discharge of water on to the Bondhus site at a rate that occurred naturally prior to upstream urban development. The problem is that storm water run-off is now exceeding the natural discharge rate due to upstream development. With continued development upstream, the problem will get worse. This situation needs to be addressed, or eventually the Bondhue property could be damaged by storm water run-off. The City would be liable for such damages. 2. City staff has been informed that the health care center located directly east of the hospital is on the verge of expansion. Rick Holloway is working with a group of investors toward development of an addition to the health care center that would almost double the size of the facility. This facility would include development of a 90 to 135 -stall parking lot, depending on whether or not the Kasper property is purchased. Coincidentally, the parking lot or driveway will likely be located in a position near or over the location of a storm sewer pipe that could be installed to allow storm water to bypass the Bondhus property. Coordinating the private development of the clinic addition and parking lot with development of the storm sewer facility could result in significant savings to both the City and the developer in terms of grading and excavation costs. Furthermore, development of the storm sewer now would eliminate the high cost to install the pipe after the parking lot is in place. 3. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt the resolution ordering the Hart Boulevard storm sower outlet feasibility study at an estimated cost of $4,300 as outlined in the City Engineer*a proposal to the City dated September 19, 1991. Under this alternative, Council agrees with the justification for the feasibility study as outlined in 10 c 2 Council Agenda - 9/23/91 the attached resolution. With this alternative, the City Engineer will work with staff in addressing the following issues. 1. Examine the associated drainage area for total run- off potential in the existing and proposed conditions. 2. Outline the need for groundwater recharge and treatment of storm water run-off. 3. Coordinate with the school and hospital districts for placement of drainage facilities. 4. Explore the potential impact to the BondhUe ponds due to a reduced drainage area. 5. Develop cost estimates for any potential alternatives. With the information above, Council will be in a position to establish the proper design and timing of improvements necessary to resolve the problem created by continued development upstream. The cost of the study would be incorporated into the project costs and assessed to benefiting property owners when the project is completed. Motion to deny authorization to proceed with development of a feasibility study. Council could take the position that the City has not received complaints from Bondhus regarding increases in storm water run-off and, therefore, the present outlet is of sufficient size and capacity. Under this alternative, the City would save the short-term cost of the study. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council select alternative 11. It makes sense to complete the feasibility study as the first step toward development of a strategy for providing an adequate outlet to the river. Failure to study the problem and respond accordingly on a timoly basis could result in serious problems for the Bondhus property for which the City would be liable. As an additional incentive, there appears to be an opportunity to coordinate a potential project with the expansion of the health care contor. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Resolution authorizing Hart Boulevard storm sower outlet feasibility study; Letter from OSM outlining project scope and providing feasibility study cost estimate; Area map. 111 RESOLUTION 91 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARAT:ON OF HART BOULEVARD STORM SEWER OUTLET FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, the current Hart Boulevard storm water outlet utilizing the Bondhus property drainage system is limited in terms of storm water capacity, and WHEREAS, the storm water affecting the existing Hart Boulevard outlet continues to increase due to continuing urbanization upstream, and WHEREAS, unusually heavy rainfall especially prior to spring thaw could result in damage to Hart Boulevard and downstream private property, and WHEREAS, Impending commercial development at the potential location of the Hart Boulevard storm water outlet has created an opportunity for coordinating the private project with the installation of the Hart Boulevard storm sewer outlet, and WHEREAS, the City Council of Monticello desires to obtain information necessary to develop a strategy for development of an adequAte outlet to the Mississippi River at Hart Boulevard. LET IT THEREFORE BE RESOLVED that the City of Monticello hereby authorizes the City Engineer to prepare the Hart Boulevard storm sewer outlet feasibility study at an estimated cost of $4,300 as proposed in the City Engineer's letter to the City datod September 19, 1991. Adopted this 23rd day of September, 1991. Mayor City Administrator SIP 19 '91 15: Irv? 0V PPL:. Irl •' P.� on Schelen CASMa)}tron& Affoclatts, Inc 1021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapoits. MN SS i t3 612.331.8640 FAX 331-3866 September 19, 1991 engineers Aichitccrs Planners Surveycis Mr. John Sirnola City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Hart Boulevard Storm Sewer Outlet OSM Proposal No. 0325.91 Dear Mr. Simola: This letter is in reference to the extension of a storm sewer outlet to the Mississippi River for the Dundas Road/Industrial Park drainage swale. The swale currently collects stormwater from the area surrounding the Industrial Park and discharges stonnwater via overland swales and piping systems to the Mississippi River. The Swale and piping is located within City easements or right-of-way through the Industrial Park and across the freeway but ends at the railroad tracks. The stormwater then travels through the high school property, across County Highway 75 and [fart Boulevard, and then overland through a series of ponds located on the Bondhus property, with the majority of the route crossing land without secured easements. The continual development of the Industrial Park has caused the stormwater runoff to increase significantly to the poin-. where the City must manage the runoff within designed drainage facilities. There are several issues that we intend to investigate with the preparation of a feasibility report. Some of those issues are as follows: Examine the associated drainage area for total runoff potential in the existing and proposed conditions. This drainage area includes the Industrial Park and the area bounded by 1.94, the railroad tracks, Fallon Avenue and County Road 118. 2. Outline the deed for groundwater recharge and treatment of storinwater runoff. 3. Coordinate with the school and hospital districts for placement of drainage facilities. 4. Explore the potential impact to the Bondhus ponds due to a reduced drainage at ea. 5. Develop cost estimates for any potential alternatives. 'Ibis scope is suhjeci to modification during the study and may include tasks that can be completed by city staff. L%-IC40_-"r hv( D - SEP 1'r '91 1S: 10 0511 I•IFLS. 191 .. - P.3 Mr. John Sirnola September 19, 1991 Page 2 We are proposing to complete the feasibility study on a cost plus materials basis, with an estimate of $4,300. This estimate should not be construed as a cost not to exceed nor as a minimum cost, but as a preliminary estimate for work to be completed. Because the project includes the possibility of a substantial amount of coordination, the engineering fee is not typical of a standard feasibility report. Therefore, should the project proceed to construction, we will credit the construction project design fee by an amount equal to 15 percent of the design fee or the actual cost of the feasibility report, whichever is less. If you have any questions regarding this estimate, please do not hesitate to call us. Sincerely, ORR•SCHEI.EN•MAYERON & ASSOCIATE?, INC. Bret A. Weiss, P.E. City Engineer /crow 0919com.js c: Rick Wolfsteller, City of Monticello Jeff O'Neill, City of Monticello C D. Edward Ames, LS. Vice President Storm Sewer Outlet ON,,; I • ��` �o��- /� .' y���ti�r' y G �,/• • 'tiY ` 7 ,o' Vii„ `� ` ��. o ♦ / I IIS 0 0 \ � I�� � • � i I Why' e *1 R SING RUN F DU TO CONTINUING.DEVELO i \� M EggISTING OUTLET THROUfH BONDUS PROPERTY IS IN¢UPFICIENT Ia THE LANG TERM -- - --- �1 FENDING HEALTH CAR CENEP ANSION - OPPORTUN T6 C 10RDINAT6 PRIVATE D IAWMENT `•' ' WITH PUBLIC UTILITY 1NSTALLATIO u b tl l RfBbMEVARD �T o ti J` Parking �I - se,�-004•E OPUon u J/.ltil�IA[A ctnvic CM*, Expatrs�n� I T OPBon B JI f1M[►P•.I� • � IOY HART BOULEVARD 1 � t. / - j —eroffliffier Come T� ems a Counct 1 Agenda - 9/23/41 9. Consideration of a resolution authoriz ina preparation of Meadow Oak pond outlet feasibility studv. (J.O.} A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the previous meeting of the City C ouncil, Mike Beck, resident of Meadow Oak Estates, voiced his concern regarding the rising level of water in the Meadow Oak pond. Beck was concerned about the threat of his home being flooded, and he was concerned that much of the park and his yard has become unusable due to the high water. Staff informed Beck that there is very little present danger of his home being flooded because a large area of the pond/park area remains available for storm water storage. In addition, it was noted that the present water level is approximately at the designed overflow elevation; therefore, development of an outlet would not result in the reclamation of yard area last to rising water. In response to Beck's concern, Council came to a consesus to develop a plan for addressing the problem. If this consensus remains, then Council should consider adopting the attached resolution per alternative O1. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to adopt the resolution ordering a Meadow Oak pond outlet feasibility study at an estimated cost of $3,504. Under this alternative, Council agrees with the justification for the feasibility study as outlined in the attached resolution. With this alternative, the City Engineer will work with staff in addressing the following issues: 1. Now soon is an outlet necoss ary? What are the drawbacks of not installing an outlet for the pond? ?. what is the potential discharge from the pond under existing and fully developed conditions? 3. Is there a potential of cost participation from MN/DOT if an outlet is constructed to the Mississippi River? 4. What are the ramifications of crossing the property between the pond and river? 5. What is the estimated cost of the project? 12 11 Council Agenda - 9/23191 With the information above, Council will be in a better position to choose the ditch 33 option or another alternative. The information will also give us a handle on when the outlet needs to be installed relative to growing residential development in the watershed area. 2. Motion to deny authorization to proceed with development of a feasibility study. Council could take the position that the present pond and park area is of sufficient size and capacity to handle any short-term storm water demand, and there is no imminent threat of flooding; therefore, the storm water study is not necessary at this time. Under this alternative, the City would save the short- term cost of the study. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council select alternative il. It makes sense to complete the feasibility study as the first step toward development of a strategy for providing a pond outlet. Failure to study the problem and respond accordingly on a timely basis could result in serious problems for the area, which could include stifling of future residential development, loss of usable park land to high water, and flooding of residences adjacent to the pond. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Resolution authorizing Meadow oak pond outlet feasibility study; Getter from OSM outlining project scope and providing feasibility study cost estimate; Area maps. 13 RESOLUTION 91 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF MEADOW OAK POND OUTLET FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, The Meadow Oak retention pond is limited in terms of storm water capacity and was originally designed to have an overflow outlet , and WHEREAS, the outlet to ditch 33 as originally constructed has been sealed , and WHEREAS, extended periods of rain or unusually heavy rainfall could result in the loss of usable park land to high water or could result in inundation of private property, and WHEREAS, without development of an outlet, much of the Meadow Oak PUD area already served by sewer and water service may be prohibited from developing because of the additional run-off that would result from development, and WHEREAS, the City Council of Monticello desires to obtain outlet information necessary to develop a strategy for solving long-term storm water problems within the watershed, which could include development, of a Meadow Oak storm water pond outlet. LET IT THEREFORE BE RESOLVED that the City of Monticello hereby authorizes the City Engineer to prepare a Meadow Oak pond outlet feasibility study at an estimated cost of $3,500 as proposed in the City Engincer's letter to the City dated September 19, 1991. Adopted this 23rd day of September, 1991. City Administrator 7 Mayor 0 SE? 19 '?1 1" 113 01;31 1In-S• r01 P.4 O--.S) &L SOcrtlxlen Mayeron a Assxalc, I 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, Mll65413 612-331-8660 FAX 331 3806 Erglneers September 19, 1991 A.:chitects Planners surveyors Mr. John Simola City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello. MN 55362 Re: Meadow Oaks Pond Outlet USM Project No. 0325-91 Dear Mr. Simola: This letter is in response to recent discussions regarding the outlet for the stornnwater retention pond located in the Meadows Oaks Subdivision. Heavy precipitation during the past few weeks has caused this pond to increase in size and elevation resulting in concern for the residents living adjacent to the pond. This pond was sized to accommodate the 100 year return frequency 24 hour design rainfall event without the need of a positive outlet. However, City policy dictates that all ponds shall have a positive outlet which allows the pond to drain to its normal water elevation after a large event storm. The outlet eliminates the reliance on percolation and evaporation to lower the water level to its normal elevation. Therefore, a storm sewer outlet was constructed to Wright County Ditch No. 33 during the utility improvement project for the development. Due to the deterioration. of County Ditch No. 33 and the extreme opposition to any improvement of the ditch, the outlet has since been plugged. The recent development of Briar Oakes Estate has again initiated interest in the necessity of an outlet for the pond. It is our understanding that based on your discussions with the County, improvement to Ditch No. 33 Is still not a viable option. Therefore, the development of a feasibility report to study various alternatives is warranted. The proposed feasibility report will concentrate on the following issues: How soon Is an outlet necessary? What are the drawbacks of not installing an outlet for the pond? What is the potential discharge from the pond under existing and fully developed conditions? 3. Is there a potential of cost participation from Mnl)01' if an outlet is constructed to the Mississippi River? e —1 OpDfn,,nT /.mnMwr V SEF 19 '91 15:11 .'GI'I rmLS. PVI P. Mr. John Simola September 19, 1991 Page 2 4. What are the ramifications of crossing the property betweeu the pond and river? 5. What is the estimated cost of the project? The scope of the project will be further defined after the project is initiated. We are proposing to complete the feasibility study on a cost plus materials basis, with an estimate of 53,500. -this estimate should not be constmed as a cost not to exceed nor as a minimum cost, but as a preliminary estimate of work to be performed. Because the project includes the possibility of a substantial amount of coordination, the engineering fee is not typical of a standard feasibility report. Therefore, should the project proceed to construction, we will credit the construction project design fee by an amount equal to 15 percent of the design fee or the cost of the feasibility report, whichever is less. If you have any questions regarding this estimate, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES INC. Bret A. Weiss, P.E. City Engineer /cmw 0919-com.js2 c: Rick Wolfsteller, City of Monticello Jeff O'Neill, City of Monticello C 0- &Jt�4�� 17. Edward Acnes, L.S. Vice President 9 bry •� 1�� N E- 53�n ST „vm Ori 'v'vv =' MEAOOW OAK ARemadve Route oil A LN ' MEA°°°°W'' a To Ditch 33 Or gibal route 6y study? Full development of area not possible without pond outlet. Use of Ditch 33 may not be viable due to County/Township resistance. Alternative routes cost and implicatic not understood. Where should we invest efforts? Is development of an outlet absolutely necessary? if so. at what stage of area residential development RUST the outlet be installed. SEINER MAP 0 Figure 14 72 Zx:-)-7 I 1 19 i4 LEG'ENDe' Existing Pipe Network Existing §urte - ce Drainage 36 -311 Figure 14 72 F•.Rr LINLr.1: IA' "SIE14 08/28/91 11.:04:07 WARRANT CIA re VEN X130 GENERAL CHECKING 1?006 08/31/91 EMEOf ENCV APPARATUS 32006 08/31/91 EMERGENCY APDAR ATUS 32115 08/31/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAI. 32116 08/31/91 QUALITT LAWN MAII/TEN 32117 08/31/01 KEN AND JOANNE LINK 32118 08/31/91 DOTv/KAREN 32118 00/31/01 DOTY/KAR E11 32118 00/31/91 OOTV/KAREN 37119 08/31/91 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 31120 09/31/01 AOODT-A-PET 37121 00/31/91 MN OEDAPT OF NATUPAL 3.122 08/31/91 JOE OTTEN 3?1?3 08/?9/91 ANNANOALE VETEPTNaPY 32123 08/29/91 ANHANOA.E VETERlNARv 3?124 00/29/01 ARA COPY REFPESHMENI / 32125 00/20/91 ROSE/Tom 32126 08/28/01 BRADLEY 0 DEIKE 32127 09/26/91 CELLULAR, ONE 32126 00/20/01 DYNAMIC SYSTEMS. INC 32120 08/28/91 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOF 32130 00/20/91 HIGH TECH ROOFING 32 131 09/20/91 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC 32132 00/20/01 INDUSTRIAL MAINT. SU 32133 09/20/91 KRAEMER/WHOA 32134 00/20/91 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SU G DISpi.r a±m±n� JP1irn?1 9ESCOTOT10. AN•)11N1•;LAIM I11V0I 190 rOPPErT rn01N, 9.395.8? 680 COPPECT CODINP P.389.82C4 0.00 •CHECK TOTAL 118 WATERCRAFT/SNOW REG 176.00 319 LAWN MOVING 1.083.75 00158 DUTCH ELM TREE REPLACE 12.50 69TRAVEL EXPENSE 19.15 48 TRAVEL EXP EII SE 4.00 48 TRAVEL EX PCN SE 19.Ls 41.20 -CHECK TOTAL 105 AOOPTIONS/ANIMAL CONT 932.00 4 PET ADOPTIONS 916.00 118 WATERCRAFT/SNOW REG 155.00 00159 DUTCH ELM TPEE REPLACE 30.00 302 VET FEES/ANIMAL CONTDO 90.00 387 MLSC ANIMAL $UL'DLiES 75.85 105.9:1 -CHECK TOTAL 408 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 60.00 330 TRAVEL EXPENSE 10.00 S50 LEGAL FEES/SHINGOPEE 840.00 555 CIVIL DEFENSE PHONE CH 65.30 679 WWTP PANEL CONTROL 4.080.00 51 COMPUTER CABLES 46.50 S58 LIBRARY FURNACE DUC 2.112.00 05 OAS/FIRE DEPT 116.10 $14 MISC BOLTS/SHOO • GAR 127.55 390 TPAVEL EXPENSE 17.50 116 MTC OF STREET EO1IoME 172.68 ORC FINANCIALSYSTEM 06/20/71 14:04:01 O:ebuffe.q.t JOI—Al WARRANT OATE VENDOR OESCRIP7I0N AMOUNT CL ATN IIJVOI'i� GENERAL CHECKING 32135 06/29/91 NATIONAL FIRE PPOTEC 279 800K5/FIRE OEPT 23.19 32136 09/79/0: O'NFITLOJEFF tet TRAVEL EIPE715E 192.00 32130 08/28/91 0'NE ILL/JEFF 181 Rf 7148/RANK CHARGE 10.00CR IS7.00 •CHECK TOTAL 32137 09/29/91 PLEASURE PROOUCTS OF .99073 CLOTHING SUPPLIES/FIR 107.70 GENERAL CHECKING TOTAL 12.2,4.%1 f� } DRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/12/91 13:53139 Disbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM IN401 GENERAL CHECKING 32138 09/10/91 J AND J DDG SUPPLIES 567 ANIMAL SUPPLIES 53.73 32139 09/10/91 PETTY CASH 166 POSTAGE/CITY HALT. 12.73 32139 09/10/91 PETTY CASH 166 MISC EXPENSE/FALLON AV 15.00 32139 09/10/91 PETTY CASH 166 COMPUTER PAPER 5.00 32139 09/10/91 PETTY CASH 166 MISC EXPENSE/BLD INS VA 8.09 32139 09/10/91 PETTY CASH 166 MISC EXPEHSE/ADMINISTR 18.79 32139 09/10/91 PETTY CASH 166 MISC SIPPLIEB/WATER DEP 4.75 32139 09/10/91 PETTY CASH 166 MISC EXPENSF/PARKS 10.00 74.38 *CHECK TOTAL 32140 09/10/91 ARNOLD/MARY 546 INFO CENTER SALARY 161.30 32140 09/10/91 ARHOLD/MARY 346 INFO CENTER SALARY 53.20CR 108.30 *CHECK TOTAL 32141 09/10/91 HAYES/WILMA 285 INFO CENTER SALARY 184.88 32141 09/t0/91 HAYES/WILMA 285 INFO CENTER SALARY 60.90CR 123.98 *CHECK TOTAL 32142 09/10/91 C P. S OF ST. CLOUD .90160 REIMS/ESCROW/BRIAR 43.019.25 32143 09/10/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 SNOW/WATERCRAFT/ATV R 276.00 32144 09/10/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAFT TITLES 74.00 32145 09/10/91 FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASS 560 FIREMEN'S RELIEF S 29.130.00 32146 09/10/91 OLSON/JERRY 159 SLD 1NSP FEES 73.00 32147 09/10/91 U.S. POSTMASTER 210 POSTAGE/CITY HALL 1.000.00 31145 09/10/91 IN DEPT OF TRADE & E 359 RED FEE/OLLIE K/CONFE 115.00 3149 09/10/91 MFLS METRODOME HILTO .90083 TRAVEL EXPENSE/OLLIE K 37.00 32130 09/10/91 00VERNMENT TRAINING 72 REO FEE/GARY A/CONFER 20.00 32151 09/10/91 STATE OF MINNESOTA 461 DECALS/STREET DEPT 20.00 32152 09/10/91 MJ DEPART OF NATURAL 119 WATERCRAFT/SNOW/ATV R 225.00 3.ta3 09/12/91 WEE/TOM 336 M14FAOE EXPENSE 93.75 32114 09/12/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPH0W 24 PHONE CHARGES 613.09 321x4 09/12f91 BRIDGEWATER TELEF?IOH 24 PHONE CHARGE/ 116." S^1'14 09/1219t BRIDOFWATER IFLEPHON 24 PHONE CHARMS 49.46 ,TL,1.A 09/1:/91 DRIO(,EWATER TCLEFMIH 24 F14DME CHARGE/ 27.07 154 0911:/91 ORIDOFWAT LR TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 79.70 09/1:/91 BRIDOLFWATER TELEPHOH 74 P14HE CHARMS 95.01 02154 09/92/9& BRIDGEWATER IELEPHOH 24 PHONE CHARGES 20.00 DRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/12/91 13153/39 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL 04ECKING 32194 09/12191 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 32194 09/12/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 32194 09/12/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHO14 32194 09/12191 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 32194 09/12/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 32194 09/12/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 32157 09/12/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 32194 09/12/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONI 32193 09/1'2191 COPY DUPLCATIMO PROD 32136 09 /12/91 DUERR'S WATER CARE 8 32137 09/12/91 EMERGENCY ONE, INC. 32138 09/12/91 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE 32139 09/12/91 GOPHER STATE ONE CAL 32160 09/12/91 HENNING s ASSOCIATES 32161 09/12/91 HERMES/JERRY 32162 09/122/91 NDOLLMD COACH LINES 32163 09/12/91 LIBERTY COMPUTER SIA 32164 09/12/91 LUKACH/J0H M 32164 09/12/91 LUKACH/JOHN 32164 09/12/97 LUKACH/JOHN 32164 09/12/91 LUKACH/JOHN 32163 09/12/91 MIDWEST OAS COMPANY 32163 09/12/91 MIDWEST OAS COMPANY 32165 09/1^2191 MI0 BEST OAS COMPANY 32165 09/12/91 MIDWEST OAS COMPANY 32165 09/12/9t MIDWEST OAS COMPANY 32165 09/12/91 MIDWEST OAS COMPANY 32165 09/12/91 MIDWEST OAS COMPANY 32165 09/12/91 MIDWEST OAS COMPANY 32166 09/12/91 MONT (CELLO ANIMAL CO 32166 09/12/91 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO Dtsbursawnt Journal 1 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE 24 PHONE CHARGES 13.50 24 PHONE CHARGES 80.57 24 PHONE CHARGES 20.00 24 PHONE CHARGES 36.28 24 PHONE CHARGES 34.45 24 PHONE CHARGES 10.00 24 PHONE CHARGES 16.91 24 PHONE CHARGES 21.30 1,224.32 41 COPY MACHINE MTC/LIBRA 50.40 49 WATER CARE/WWTP RENTAL 28.15 367 AERIAL LADDER TRK 26,148.56 510 CLOTHING SLP/FIRE DEPT 51.00 69 PROF SERVICES/WATER OF 83.00 309 PROF SER/CITY OROCH 31990.00 81 LIBRARY GLEAMING CONT 227.50 483 BUS TANSiPORTATION C 4,263.04 99 COMPUTER PAPER 147.60 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 63.74 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 21.91 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 21.91 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 21.92 131.40 115 UTILITIES 15.34 115 UTILITIES 3.00 115 UTILITIES 5.04 115 UTILITIES 23.12 115 UTILITIES 5.57 115 UTILITIES 6.68 115 UTILITIES 3.00 115 UTILITIES 16.09 70.14 165 ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRA 500.00 105 MILEAGE EXPENSE 49.75 549.75 *CHECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL *CNECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL J Ej BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/12/91 13e53s39 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKIHO 32167 09/12/91 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 32168 09/12/91 NORTHERN STATES PONE 32160 09/12/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32168 09/1/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32160 09/12/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32168 09/12/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32168 09/12/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32168 09/12/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32168 09/12/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32168 09/12/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32160 09/12/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32168 09/12/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32160 09/12/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 32169 09/12/91 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS 32170 09/12/91 NORWEST INVESTMENT S 32171 09/12/91 PLYMOUTH SUPPLY COMP 32172 09/12/91 POLKA DOT RECYCLINO 32173 09/12/91 PRENTICE HALL 32174 09/12/91 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 32174 09/12/91 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 32173 09/12/91 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC 32175 09/12/91 ROYAL TIRE OF MOMTIC 32175 09/12/91 ROYAL TIRE OF MIONTIC 32176 09/12/91 SHELTON COMPANY 32177 09/12/91 SHIELY MASONRY PRODU 32170 09/12/91 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDE 32179 09/12/91 TURHQUIST PAPER COMP 32180 09/12/91 UNITOO RENTAL SERVIC 32100 09/t2/91 UNI TOO RENTAL SERVLC 3100 09/12/91 UNITOO RENTAL SERVIC S2t00 09/12/91 UNITOO RENTAL SERV IC 32100 09/12/91 MINI TOO RENTAL SERVIC 32100 09/12/91 UNITOO RENTAL SERVIC Disbursomsnt Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVO: 144 EQUIP REPAIRS/STREETS 13.70 148 UTILITIES 3.110.03 149 UTILITIES 205.34 148 UTILITIES 3,874.50 148 UTILITIES 67.34 148 UTILITIES 437.92 148 UTILITIES 57.42 148 UTILITIES 231.63 148 UTILITIES 12.86 148 UTILITIES 208.69 148 UTILITIES 181.75 148 UTILITIES 557.71 148 UTILITIES 1.018.27 9.963.68 550 PRW SERVICES/PLAN 8 820.00 155 COMPUTER PAYMENT 2,407.61 569 LADDER/CITY HALL 210.00 170 RECYCLINO CONTRACT 1,763.27 400 SUSCRIPTIOH RENEWAL 146.28 175 WWTP CONTRACT PAYM 28,487.50 175 SUNNY FRESH ANALYSI 1,361.52 29,849.02 227 EQUIP REP PARTS/PARKS 106.14 227 REP 4 MTC/STREETS 43.90 227 VEH REPAIRS/FIRE DEPT 47.00 197.04 269 WAND HEADS/RECYCLINO 340.00 339 SEWER COLL PROF SERVIC 95.96 376 MTC AOREEMENT/CH CLOG 134.25 208 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 221.33 211 UNIFORM RENTAL 8.23 211 UNIFORM RENTAL 5.22 211 UNIFORM RENTAL 16.00 211 UNIFORM RENTAL 16.00 211 UNIFORM RENTAL 64.20 211 UNIFORM RENTAL 64.27 177.00 *CHECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL BRCFINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/1/91 13a53s39 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING D dsbursemant Journal 1 DESCRIPTION MOUNT CLAIM INVOICE 32181 09/12/91 UNKXAL 213 OASAdATER DEPT 17.55 32181 09/12/91 UNOCAL 213 OAS/SEWER COLLECTIONS 17.33 35.10 *CHECK TOTAL 32182 09/12/91 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP 512 UTILITIES 8.31 GENERAL CHECKING TOTAL 157,837.90 J BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/18/91 09c07t39 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 32183 09/17/91 AME READY MIX 32183 09/17/91 AME READY MIX 32184 09/17/91 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA 32184 09/17/91 VASKO RUBBISH REMDVA 32189 09/17/91 M 6 P TRANSPORT, INC 32186 09/17/91 FOREST CITY ROAD LAN 32187 09/17/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 32187 09/17/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 32187 09/17/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 32188 09/17/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32188 09/17/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32188 09/17/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32108 09/17/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32188 09/17/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32188 O9/17/9L AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32188 09/17/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32188 09/17/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32188 09/17/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32188 09/17/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32188 09/17/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32188 09/17/91 AMCRICAN NATIONAL BA 32180 09/17/91 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 32189 09/17/91 GOVERNMENT TRAINING 32190 09/17/91 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET 32191 09/17/91 LATOUR CONSTRUCTION 12191 09/17/91 LATOUR CONSTRUCTION 32191 09/17/91 LATOUR CONSTRUCTION 32192 09/17/91 U.S. POSTMASTER 52193 09/23/91 A T 6 T INFO SYSTEMS 32194 09/23/91 ANDERSON 4, ASSOCIATE 32194 09/23/91 ANDERSON 6 ASSOCIATE Dlsbursemen! Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INV01 8 ODOR CONTROL BLD/S FR 176.68 B STREET MTC MATERIAL 137.13 293.81 924 GARBAGE CONTRACT PY 7,914.32 924 SALES TAX/GARBAGE CON 917.94 8,432.26 269 BAND/PARKS DEPT 342.03 963 ADO'L LAND FILL CHA 6,677.10 193 SMALL TOOLS/STREET DEPT 6.39 193 STREET MTC MATERIAL 33.61 193 ODOR CONTROL BLD/S FRE 80.88 120.84 7 PAYING AGENT FEES/VEI 178.77 7 PAYING AGENT FEES/REM 196.16 7 PAYING AGENT FEES/SEW 104.75 7 PAYING AGSNT FEES/198 189.94 7 PAYING AGENT FEES/SAN 217.93 7 PAYING AGENT FEES/CON 177.03 7 PAYING AGENT FEES/NAW 179.87 7 PAYING AGENT FEEB/198 179.64 7 PAYING AGENT FEES/WAT 210.38 7 PAVING AGENT FEEB/ELD 176.74 7 PAVING AGENT FEES/190 177.03 7 PAYING AGENT FEES/199 181.27 7 PAYING ADEN FEES/K MA 189.99 2,430.66 72 REO FEE/RICK W 25.00 176 CITY CONT/DAN BLONIGE 146.29 469 CONST COSTS/FALLON 14,015.92 465 CONST COSTS/BRIAR O 8,934.42 467 CONST COSTS/CARD H 40,809.33 63,99.07 210 POSTAGE/GARBAGE 39.90 19 FIRE PHONE CHARGES 9.30 10 MISC BIONS/STREET DEP 917.90 10 PAINT,ETC/STREET DEPT 110.94 625.44 *CHECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL *CHCCK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/18/91 0907,39 WARRANT DATE . VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 32199 09/23/91 ANDERSON/ SH IRLEY 32196 09/23/91 BARTON SAND 6 GRAVEL 32197 09/23/91 BEN FRANKLIN 32197 09/23/91 BEN FRANKLIN 32197 09/23/91 BEN FRANKLIN 32198 09/23/91 BERGSTROM'S LAWN 6 O 32199 09/23/91 RIFFS. INC. 32200 09/23/91 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS, 32201 09/23/91 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 32201 09/23/91 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32202 09/23/91 COAST TO COAST 32203 09/23/91 COMPUTER -AID, INC. 32204 09/23/91 DENN/FRANKLIN 32205 09/23/91 EMERGENCY APPARATUS 32206 09/23/91 FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER 32207 09/23/91 FIROT TRUST CENTER 3222207 09/23/91 FIRST TRUST CENTER Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE 13 SALARY - OAA MEETING 17.00 307 MISC DUMPING/STREET DE 10.00 20 MISC EXPENSE/BRIAR OAKS 7.99 20 MISC EXPENSE/CARDINAL H 7.58 20 MISC EXPENSE/STREETS 3.89 19.06 441 OIL/PARKS DEPT 120.00 395 LATRINE RENTAL/PARKS 70.00 25 CLASS V/PARKS DEPT 351.00 26 PROF SERVICES/AROPLAX 839.52 26 MISC PROF SERVICES/ 1,589.52 2,429.04 35 VEH REPAIR PARTS/STREE 46.48 35 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/STR 20.24 35 MISC SUPPLIES/WATER DE 40.31 35 BLD REPAIR SUP/LIBRARY 9.46 35 MISC SUPPLIES/LIBRARY 61.48 35 EQUIP REP PARTS/SEWER 31.91 35 MISC SUPPLIES/ANIMAL 59.32 35 MTC SUPPLIES/MATER 4.38 35 CLOTHING SUPPLIES/NATE 33.24 35 BLD REPAIR SUP/PARKS 14.02 35 MISC SUPPLIES/CITY HALL 3.99 35 MISC REP 6 MTC SUP/BTR 7.08 35 MISC SUPPLIER/PARKS 02.04 33 ODOR CONTROL 13LO/S FRES 4.17 35 BLD REP SUPPLIES/WATER 0.99 35 STR MTC MATERIAL/STREE 29.92 458.65 515 PROP SERVICES/COMPUTE 180.00 295 SALARY/OAA MEETING 60.00 480 VEHICLE REPAIRS/FIR 2,909.26 55 BLD REPAIR SUP/C HALL 6.25 50 MISC FESS/0 O DONDS 113.25 50 MISC FEES/0 0 BONDS 57.50 170.75 •CHECK TOTAL $CHECK. TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/18/91 09807/39 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 32208 09/23/91 GARTNER'S OFFICE PRO 32208 09/23/91 OARTNER'S OFFICE PRO 32209 09/23/91 GOOLER/GLORIA 32209 09/23/91 GOOLER/GLORIA 32210 09/23/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 32210 09/23/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 32210 09/23/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 2210 09/23/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 32210 09/23/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 32210 09/23/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 32210 09/23/91 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 32211 09/23/91 HERMES/JERRY 32212 09/23/91 INTER CITY MANAGEMEN 32213 09/23/91 J M OIL COMPANY 32214 09/23/91 JIM'S RAIL SHOP 32215 09/23/91 MARCO BUSINESS PRODU 32216 09/23/91 MAUS FOODS 32216 09/23/91 MAUS FOODS 32216 09/23/91 MAUS FOODS 32216 09/23/91 MAUS FOODS 32216 09/23/91 MAUS FOODS 32217 09/23/91 MAUS/KENNETH 32218 09/23/91 MONTICELLO PRINTING 32218 09/23/91 MONTICELLO PRINTING 32219 09/23/91 MONTICELLO TIt1E0 32219 09/23/91 MONT ICELLO TIMES 2219 09/23/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 32219 09/23/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 2219 09/25/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 32219 09/23/91 MONTICELLO TIMES .12219 09/23/91 MONTICELLO TIMES Dlsburssmsnt Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOIC( 377 COMPUTER PAPER/C HALL 34.90 377 MISC OFFICE SUP/C HALL 4.66 39.16 294 SALARY/OAA MEETING 140.00 294 OAA MILEAGE EXPENSE 19.60 159.80 78 MISC SUPPLIES/FIRE DEP 21.06 78 MISC SUPPLIES/WATER DEP 5.96 78 VEH REP PARTS/STREETS 69.57 78 EOUIP REP PARTS/STREET 71.27 78 MISC SUPPLIES/SHGP O GA 4.07 78 STREET MTC MATERIAL 26.41 78 VEH REP PARTS/PARKS 1.35 199.67 81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50 416 SUB RENEWAL/COMPUTER 130.00 95 LUBRICANTS/FIRE DEPT 25.80 571 TREE GUARDS/STREET DE 310.00 106 MISC OFFICES SUP/C HA 262.80 108 MISC SUPPLIES/LtBRARY 41.98 LOB MISC SUFFLIEB/CITY HAL 22.13 108 MISC SUP/SHOP 6 GARAGE 55.01 108 CLEANING SUP/ANIMAL 17.55 LOB MISC SUPPLIES/ANIMAL 40.20 177.67 109 SALARY/OAA BOARD 45.00 137 BUSINESS CARDS/T BOISE 33.65 137 BUSINESS CARDS/J SIMOL 20.85 62.70 140 8LD PERMIT INFORMATION 62.80 140 ANIMAL INFORMATION 32.60 140 COMPOSITE INFORMATION 40.90 140 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 500.67 140 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES 27.95 140 NATER TOWER INFORMATIO 30.00 140 PROGRESS MONTI ARTICL 577.10 1,370.02 $CHECK. TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/ 18/91 09.07139 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 32220 09/23/91 MOODV'S INVESTORS BE 32220 09/23/91 MOODY'S INVESTORS BE 32220 09/23/91 MOODY'S INVESTORS BE 32221 09/23/91 MOON MOTOR SALES, IN 32221 09/23/91 MOON MOTOR SALES, IN 32221 09/23/91 MOON MOTOR SALES, IN 32222 09/23/91 O.E.I. BUSINESS FORM 32223 09/23/91 OLSON, USSET,AGAN & 32223 09/23/91 OLSON, USSET,AOAN & 32224 09/23/91 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 32224 09/23/91 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 32224 09/23/91 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 32224 09/23/91 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 32224 09/23191 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 32224 09/23/91 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 32225 09/23/91 P & H WAREHOUSE BALE 32226 09/23/91 PREUSSE'8 CLEANING 8 32227 09/23/91 SALKOWSKI/THOMAS 32227 09/23/91 SALKOWSKI/THOMAS 32228 09/23/91 SAMUELSON/STEVE 32229 09/23/91 SPRINOSTED, INCORPOR 32229 09/23/91 SPRINOSTED, INCORPOR 32.229 09/03/91 SPRINGSTED, INCORPOR 3223009.12319L OT. CLOUD RESTAURANT 32231 09/23/91 STENCEL/PCOOV 32232 09/23/91 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITS 3223309/2301 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNCAPO GENERAL CHECKING Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOIC 313 BOND ISS FEE/FALLON AV 92.00 313 BOND ISS FEE/BRIAR 1,202.00 313 BOND ISS FEE/CARDINAL 706.00 2,000.00 142 EQUIP REP PARTS/PARKS 39.70 142 MISC SUPPLIES/SHADE TR 57.50 142 MTC OF EOUIP/SHADE TRE 43.08 136.28 178 COPY MACHINE PAPER 117.15 292 MISC PROF SER/BRIAR OK 93.75 292 MISC LEGAL FEES 2.309.90 2,403.25 162 END FEES/CARDINAL 10,268.59 162 MISC ENGINEERING FE 4,302.63 162 ENO FEES/SCHOL BVL&92 626.60 162 ENO FEES/REMMELE PROJ 34.88 162 ENG FEES/BRIAR OAK, 20,021.75 162 ENO FEES/FALLON AVE 9,882.20 45,936.65 271 MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS 963.25 173 CITY HALL CLEANING CO 400.00 297 SALARY/OAA MEETING 200.00 297 OAA TRAVEL EXPENSE 13.30 215.30 570 FIRE HALL CLEANING 50.00 307 00 BOND FEE/FALLON AV 471.60 307 00 BOND FEE/BRIAR O 6.161.59 307 00 BOND FEE/CARDINA 3.619.04 10,252.23 289 CAN LINERS/LIBRARY 14.10 1" ASSESSING CONTRACT PY 949.50 219 GHERIFF'S CONTRACT 14,336.95 224 SEPT CONTRACT PAYMENT 625.00 TOTAL 170.7".05 $CHECK TOTAL .CHECK TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL .CHECK TOTAL a $CHECK TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL P,,RfCI11aNf lnl GYS 1'F •• 08/30/91 11:76:27 Oi.nurspmenl Jour ani WAP,P1811 QA TE VE"oop .. y;71PT 1oli Ar•OUWT .:LAIN I1R•r.) L tOVOR FOND,- +5947 09/30/91 PHIL+.IPS 6 SOr+S COTE 900037 LIQUOP PURCHASE 5.005.14 15848 08/30/91 U S WEST C!tMMUNICATI 800093 ADVERTISING 71.80 15849 08/30/91 JOHNSON BROS WMOLESA 800077 WINE 011RCHASE 70^.21 15980 OB/30/Oi M1ri71 DEPARrMENT OF R 800008 SALES TAT DUE/JULY 17.705.70 15857 09/30/91 GRIOGS. COOPED 6 COM 900019 LIQUOR PURCHASE 2.708.44 15057 00/30/91 TWIN CITIES FLAG SOU 900040 FLAG REPAIRS 33.10 15653 08/30/91 ST. CLOUD FIRE EQUIP 800077 SERVICE FIRE EKTINQ 10.00 15954 00/30/91 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 900072 LIQUOR PURCHASE tA8.76 1595') 08/30/9+ JOHNSON EROS WHOLESA 800072 VINE PURCHASE 279.15 15856 09/30/91 G91GGS. COOPER D COM 800018 LIQUOR PURCHASE 3.150.37 15057 08/30/9+ EAGLE WINE COMPANY 000017 VINE PURCHASE 4 2. 77 14948 00/30/91 PHILLIPS d 50115 CO/E 00007 LIQUOP DUOCHASE 463.41 15959 09/3019+ PMill1P5 11 SONS CO/E 800037 WINE• OUPCHASE 539.59 1.071.99 -CHECK TOTAL 1')959 09/30/91 COAST To COAST 1300004 PEOECOPAT INP LIQUOR S 159.94 15880 00/30/01 ROHLF ING 800111 WINE PURCHASE 73.95 15801 08/30/91 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 900017 WINE PURCHASE 1;31.40 15062 00/30/01 QUALITY WINE 0 SPIR1 000040 MIK PURCHASE 70.17 15902 09/30/91 OUALITY' WINE 6 SPIRI 900040 LIQUOP PURCHASE 1.000.57 15662 00/30/01 QUALITY WINE 6 SPIRI 800040 WINE PURCHASE 487.38 1.565.05 'CHECK TO1AL 15083 08/30/91 JOHNSON EROS WHOLESA 000022 LtOUOR PURCHASE 1.3 +).07 15061 08/30/91 .JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800077 WINE PURCHASE 547.37 1.061.34 -CHECK TOTAL 15804 06/30/91 PHILLIPS 6 SONS CO/E 000037 LIQUOR PURC,MASE 7.054.01 15064 00/30/91 011ILLIOS ► SONS CO/E 800037 WINE PURCHASE 170.65 • 2.775.57 'C14ECA TOTAL 1. IOUOR FUND TOTAL 37.000.17 C� / BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/1--/91 1352113 Disbursement Journal i J WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION ANOINT CLAIM INVOI LIQUOR FUND 13065 09/12/91 CUSTOM INTERIOR CARE 800104 CARPET CLEANING 120.00 19866 09/12/91 GRIGGS, COOPER 6 COM 800018 LIOl10R PURCHASE 13,877.79 19067 09/12/91 BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA 800001 POP PURCHASE 329.39 15867 09/12/91 BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA 800001 MISC SUPPLIES 80.00 409.39 *CHECK TOTAL 19068 09/12/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 600002 TELEPHONE CHARGES 70.43 19069 09/12/91 COAST TO COAST 800004 NISC MTC SUPPLIES 20.50 15870 09/12/91 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUT 800009 MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE 57.57 15070 09/12/91 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUT 800009 ORANGE JUICE FOR RESA 168.10 15870 09/12/91 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIDUT 800009 BEER PURCHASE 24,150.56 24,376.25 *CHECK TOTAL 15071 09/l2/91 DAVMOR HAMCO 800085 PAPER/RIBBOHS-CASH REO 84.65 15072 09/1222/91 DAY DISTRIBUTING COM 800010 BEER PURCHASE 643.50 15073 09/122/91 DICK WHOLESALE CO., 800011 BEER PURCHASE 2,043.90 15073 09/12/91 DICK WHOLESALE CO., 800011 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIE 61.00 2,104.90 *CHECK TOTAL 15074 09/122/91 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 WINE PURCHASE 299.48 15074 09/12/91 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 MIX PURCHASE 21.68 321.16 *CHECK TOTAL 15875 09/12/91 ORO'JSLEIN BEVERAGE I 800019 BEER PURCHASE 21,729.30 15075 09/12/91 OROSSLEIN BEVERAGE 1 800019 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIE 22.20 21,751.50 *CHECK TOTAL 15876 09/12/91 JUDE CANDY 6 TOBACCO 000021 CIGARS/CICS FOR RESAL 307.82 15076 09/12/91 JUDE CANDY 6 TOBACCO 800021 BAGS, ETC/SUPPLIES 22.50 330.40 &CHECK TOTAL 15077 09/12/91 LIEFERT TRUCKING 000023 FREIGHT CHARGES 481.92 15070 OV/12/91 M1DWEUI' UAS COMPANY 800028 UTILITIES 6.68 15079 09/12/91 MINN DEPARTMENT OF R 600006 SALES TAX FOR AUOU 13,662.44 15000 09/12/91 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 600031 OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.69 15801 09/12/91 MONTICELLO TIMES 600032 ADVERTISING 206.90 15602 09/1.2./91 WIRT14CRH STATES POWE 900035 UTILITIES 1,001.55 BRCFINANCIAL SYSTEM C- 09/12/91 13292.13 Disbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE LIQUOR FUND 19883 09/1/91 O'HARA BROS. COMPANI 800098 MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE 499.90 19884 09/1.^../91 OLSON 6 SONS ELECTRI 800036 MISC PITC SUPPLIES 13.47 19889 09/12/91 RON'S ICE COMPANY 800041 ICE FOR RESALE 1,042.89 19886 09/1/91 SEVEN-UP BOTTLING CO 000043 POP PURCHASE 84.30 19087 09/12/91 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 600048 BEER PURCHASE 19,964.60 19888 09/12/91 VIKING COCA-COLA BOT 800091 POP PURCHASE 492.99 19889 09/12/91 WRISNT WAY SHOPPER 800106 ADVERTISING 400.00 LIQUOR FUND TOTAL 101,940.23 COUNCIL UPDATE September 20, 1991 DEVELOPMENT OF MINNESOTA STATE AID TO HIGHWAYS SYSTEM. (J.O.) Attached you will find a preliminary plan for development of Monticello's state aid system. The plan before you is being submitted for review by MN/DOT and will be submitted to you later for final approval. In establishing the preliminary plan, City staff and the City Engineer took the following criteria into consideration. 1. Major collector roads that handle regional traffic received priority. Roads that meet this criteria include "School Boulevard" and 7th Street from Highway 39 to County Road 118. 2. Roadways that have regional importance that may also be difficult to finance entirely by assessments received priority. For instance, individual lots will not be allowed to have access to the boulevard that will eventually pass through the Rjellberg property (Evergreens), which reduces the ability of the City to assess adjoining property for the entire cost to install the roadway. The state aid program can be used to supplement that portion of the cost that cannot be reasonably financed via assessments. 3. Dundee Road between County Road 117 and Highway 25 was included due to the potential need to upgrade the Dundee/ Highway 25 intersection. 4. The Fallon Avenue bridge was included due to the high cost of such a project. This project may not be feasible without the ability to utilize state aid funds. The balance of Fallon Avenue between the future bridge and School Boulevard is included because this roadway needs to be upgraded relatively soon and because the state aid program requires that all roads designated on the system be linked to a county road. Again, this plan is preliminary and has not received preliminary MN/DOT approval; therefore, it could change prior to formal Council consideration. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the proposed system, or if you feel the preliminary plan should be modified prior to submittal to MN/DOT, please let me know. As a final note, the City continues to wait for final certification of a population in excess of 5,000. 1 was told during the summer that the final number would be provided by September 1, 1991. Now I am told that the certification may not be available until October 1991. City qualification for the state aid program requires that the City population be certified as being over 5,000 by Council Update September 20, 1991 Page 2 December 31, 1991. I am becoming more nervous that the Census Bureau may miss this deadline and am also concerned that even if they make the deadline, they may make a mistake or foul up the total population count when the 42 housing units mistakenly allocated to trio township are reallocated to the city. C CITY OF MOUTICEI.LO Monthly Building Departmont Report Month oI August , 19 91 PERMITS AUD USES ' Lept 'Thlp Gema Month Lt ee Y.-'Thle Yeer PERMITS ISSUED Month July Month Augupt Leat Year To Wte To Deta RESIDENTIAL Number 26 15 IS 90 9 Veluetlon 5165,900.00 ! 100,700.00 $ 259,500.00 9 1,761,000.00 9 1,191,200.0 Fpeo 3,017.51 911.16 2,097.17 I1, 368.00 11, 690. SI Surcher9ee 210.10 18.10 128.25 868.95 732.2'_ COMMERCIAL Numbo[ 6 1 / 20 IE Vel ueclon 73,700.00 29,100.00 a1 ,500.00 2,661,000.00 716,100.0[ Peep 595.10 321.60 131.00 15,765.81 2,205.0= Surcherge9 76.10 11.20 20.50 1,711.00 106.05 INDUS 771I AL Number 7 I 7 7 Velvet/on 93,500.00 1,200.00 2,657,100.00 2,035,900.00 119,700.0E F. 1139.77 12.00 15,033.67 17,077.10 1,106.77 Gurcherg- 16.75 2.10 1,326.55 1,117.95 59.6_ PIAIMBING Numbpc 6 1 7 73 22.l Fe ea 179.00 20.00 29].00 966.00 52/.0 Surchergoe 3.00 .50 3.50 16.50 11.0 OTNERG Numller I I 1 6 velvet .on 00.00 00.00 00.00 95,000.00 00.0E veep 10.00 10.00 10.00 1.100.60 20.OL Gurene rUop .50 •50 •50 19.50 I.OC TOTAL NO. PERMITS 12 22 30 IS6 116 TOTAL VAI.UATION 653,100.00 3131,300.00 $3.956,100.D0 $7,775,900.00 61,827,000.00 TOTAL PEES 85,731.66 51,307.76 517,867.60 516.653.71 815,616.63 TOTAL SURCHARGES 8726.15 865.10 81,180.60 53,693.90 8910.15 C1111RENT M)NTII • FEES II IUWsr I. IM to PERMIT NATURE Number PERMIT SURCHARGE veluattpn Thle yenr' I.ee1 year lo BlnUFemlly 1 8 1:1.16 5 26.55 5 53,100.00 I8 22 Ouplpe 1 0 0 1 Multi-Iemlly 0 6 Ca®al elel 1 1 Indueillel 136.00 6.80 13,600.00 5 1 Pae. G., 11*1 2 0 BIVns 1 Publ to nu l I lnya ALTLRATION OR ALPAIR Uuel llnyp 11 )]9.00 11.75 )),100.00 !] 50 Comps ulel 1 ]21.60 11.20 79.100.00 IB 11 InAue tllel 1 12.00 7.10 1,200.00 1 ) PI.UMD I NO 22 ]] All Typos 1 20.00 .50 AC :LaamT GTRUCTUR EO GYI®Iny Poole 1 1 Dao4s 1 11.00 .!0 1.100.00 21 I) TIJIPORARY PLR"IT o COLMOLITIOM 1 10.00 .10 00.00 7 1 TOTA1.8 22 11.307.76 665.10 1111,300.00 146 156 INDIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT Month of Auquat , 1991 PERMIT DESCRIPTION TYPEI NAME -TION VALUATION NUMBER 91-1726 DGWIL.h house D Hillside Partnership/610 Cuter St. 400.00 91-1727 Deck AD Ahmad Naklb/25) Misalsetppi Drive 1,500.00 9t-1728 New entry AC Gila. G Jcan, Lenrmeter/120 W. ]rd at. 6,400.00 91-1779for remodel AC Todd 6 Jenne Ile Swenson/1]] 5endba rg Rd. 20,000.00 91-1730 House raroof AD Russell G Bandt• OSaon/720 B. 4th St. 1,500.00 91-1771 Xouee G 9e repo residing AD Rlck G Garb Owcl1/7841 Red Wk [aha 2,500.00 91-1772 House addlt ton AD John G Jane Klebal/507 E. River Bt. 3,000.00 91-17]] Wrega r.sldl ng AD mi th/112 6. 3rd 8t. Ban G Anne -It"/ 1.500.00 91-1774 Iloti6e G pe rape BP New Century Nom.•/2821 Wkviw Lane 53,100.00 91-17]5 Interior remodel AC Richard G Da V11 Gulbrandscn/t12 Y. Broadway 1,300.00 91-17]6 Buildingaddition lfootinge G foundation well Only) Al NN Daft of T[anapottetlon/117 Chel.aa Rd. 4.200.00 91-17)7 Otorapa Wlldl np AC had G Dorothy To17.1/273 M. Broadrey 1,300.00 91-1770 Houoo eddltlon AD Ron G Cindy Mlaha.IiS/623 B. ]rd St. 1),000.00 91-1779 Storage bulldtng AD Clifford Gustafson/200 W. River Bt. 1,500.00 91-1740 Nouse G gareg0 ratoot AD Joe G Karl Kounkal/981 Golf Course Rd. 1.300.00 91-1741 Attached gersge RG Reymofd G Karla Dickey/112 HeOman la.. 6.600.00 91-1742 Attached 9ara9e RG Kenneth G Brenda Rossberp/1]5 Iladman We 7,000.00 91-7747 Baseman[ finish AD Joe G Kart Kouhkal/981 Colt Course Rd 1,500.00 91-7744 Storage bul ld ing AD George Dye/11 rairway Drive 1,300.00 91-1745 House f garage [aehingle AD Otwc. G Rhonda Tb lalen/IIB Illllc[.at Rd. 7.500.00 91-1746 Stora pe bu lldfn9 AD Linda Duckson/4206 K)ellberg K. Trallar Pk. 1 500.00 TOTALS at 4T ]opo 00 PLAN REVIEW 91-1734 House G 9.1.9. 8P New Century Hoemo./2821 Wkviw Len. 338.36 TOTAL PLAN REVIEW a]- 0. d TOTAL ltrvzm1E 41,111,19 PES PERMIT SURCKARG2 PLU.31AG I SURCKAAGE 910.00 $.50 15.00 .SO 84.60 7.20 207.00 10.00 15.00 .10 75.00 1.25 50.00 2.50 15.00 .50 785.60 26.55 75.00 .50 42.00 7.10 15.00 .50 144.00 6.10 13.00 SO 15.00 .30 66.00 ].70 70.00 ].30 15.00 .10 15.00 .50 13.00 .50 13.00 SO 61,249.20 764.90 620.00 7.50 720.00 4.50 CITY OF MONTICELLO 09/16/91 YTD REVENUE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 18:02:28 FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 - APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 GENERAL FUND TAXES Current Ad Valorem Taxes 1,4441.290 648,534 795,756' Delinquent Ad Valorem Ta 6,088 (6.088) Mobile Home Taxes Pen & Int -Ad Valorem Tax 8,000 12,167 (4,167) Forfeited Tax Sale Appor TOTAL TAXES ---------- 1,452,290 ---------- 666,789 ---------- 785.501 LICENSES & PERMITS Liquor Licenses 17,350 17,991 (641) Beer Licenses 1,600 1,018 583 Set Up Licenses 325 350 (25) Other Business License/P 60 (60) Building Permits 40.000 13.453 26.547 Variances/CondUse Permi 1,750 350 1.400 Plumbing Connection Perm Animal Licenses 500 1,335 (835) Bingo Licenses Cable Franchise Foos Other Non -Bus License/Pe 2,000 ---------- 1.521 480 ---------- TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS 63,525 ---------- 36.077 27.448 INTERGOVERNMENTAL Federal Grants - CETA Local Government Aids Homestead Credits - HACA 36,578 (36,578) Fire Dept Aid 37,000 29,138 7,862 Police Dept Aid 18.000 181000 County Highway Grants 4,000 4,000 Recycling Incentive 4,800 ---------- 1.621 ---------- 3,179 ---------- TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL_ 63.000 67,337 (3.537) CHARGES FOR SERVICES Zoning/Subdivision Fees 500 1,925 (1,425) Sale of Maps & Publicati 100 90 11 Motor Vehiclo/Dop Rog Fa 70.000 59,104 10,896 Assessment Searches 600 512 B8 Inspection Foos 10.500 (4n) 10,940 ({ Fire Protection Twp Cont 42,715 22,364 20,352 Spacial Garbage Proc/Roc 4,000 3.656 344 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD REVENUE GUIDELINE SUMMARY `-' FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 Part: Fees Other Charges for Servic TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES FINES & FORFEITURES Animal Impoundment Fines TOTAL FINES & FORFEITURES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Spec Asmt Principal - Co Spec Asmt Pen & I-nterest TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS MISCELLANEOUS Interest Earnings Ren is Contributions - private Sale of Property Refunds/Reimbursements Other Mise RovenUe TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS OTHER SOURCES Contrib from Enterprise Transfer from Other Fund TOTAL OTHER SOURCE'S TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES TOTAL UDAG FUND REVENUES . TOTAL LIBRARY FUND REVENUES % 'I(I AL lila♦ f-UNU HIc VENULS APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 500 500 11000 87 913 129,915 87,697 42,218 9,000 8,783 217 ----9- ,000 ---- 8,783 217 983 (982•) 75 75 ---------- 75 ------- 983 (908) 64,100 64,100 4,700 2,565 2,135 2,400 2,400 100 75 25 11 , Oi10 2.140 8,860 100 1,370 (1,270) ---------- 82. 400 ---------- 6,150 ---------- 76,250 1,801,005 873,816 927,189 J3,925 6,461 7,464 .......... ..n....... .......... 26,500 12,698 13,802 278.850 142.908 135,942 .......... ,......... .....n.... 09/16/91 18:02:28 14 09/16/91 18:02:^28 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD REVENUE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 TOTAL SHADE TREE FUND REVENU 44,350 -------------------- -------------------- 22,843 21,507 ---------- ---------- TOTAL PARK & REC GRANT REVEN TOTAL OAA FUND REVENUES 31,625 14,548 17,077 TOTAL CAP PROJ REV FUND REVE 167,254 89,784 77,471 TOTAL EDA FUND REVENUES 10,850 6,937 3,913 TOTAL SEWER IMPR FUND REVENU t4,800 5,221 9,579 IC AL WATER IMPR FUND REVENU 11,100 4,500 6,600 TOTAL WATER FUND REVENUES 141,055 69,971 71,084 TOTAL SEWER FUND REVENUES 426,890 250,209 176,681 TOTAL LIOUOR FUND REVENUE'S 1,209,250 961,060 328,190 TOTAL 1"RANSIT FUND REVENUES 72,759 46,402 26,257 1"OTAL INVESTMENT FUND REVENU 83,414 (83,414) 14 09/16/91 18:02:^28 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD REVENUE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 APPROVED BUDGET 1991 *DEBT SERVICE REVENUE SUMMARY: * Taxes 1.021,937 * Licenses & Permits * Intergovernmental t Charges for Services t Fines & Forfeitures * Special Assessments 358.907 * Miscellaneous Revenue 106.625 t Other Sources 165.034 *TOTAL DEBT SERVICE REVENU 1.652.503 ►CAPITAL PROJECT REVENUE SUMMARY t Taxes Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental t Charges for Services S Fines & Forfeitures * Special Assessments * Miscellaneous Revenue * Other Sources *TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT REV YTD REMAINING POSTED BALANCE 464,228 557,709 25.877 (25.877) 796.393 (437.486) 106,625 165,034 1.286.498 366.005 09/16/91 18:02:28 /Itttt*ittlittlllt►iltltl/1►llttlttlllltttllil t►*tttttlltttl►ttllttt*lit/►t*k*It*!!� *REVENUE SUMMARY - ALL FUNDS: i / Taxes 3,007,078 1,394.902 1.612.176 * Licenses & Permits 63,525 36.077 27,448 t Intergovernmental 107.842 131.288 (23.446) It Chao -gas for Services 1.971,870 1,349.245 622,625 ► Fines & Forfeitures 9,000 8.783 217 t Special Assessments 364,597 818,516 (453,919) 1 Miacellnneous Rovenuf.-, 293,750 138,537 155.213 * Other Sources 165.034 165.034 *TOTAL REVENUES - ALL FUND 5,902,696 3,877,348 2,105.348 .......... .......... ......... C TOTAL ELECTIONS EXPENSE FINANCE Pei tmof.i,1 sw"viw» Suppl105 Othor Services G Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL FINANCE EXPENSE TOTAL AUDIT EXPENSE (ASSESSING Formas l Services Supplie 73,475 CITY OF MONTICELLO 36.199 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 525 727 FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 76,200 .......... 40,487 .......... 35.713 .......... 31Aug91 11,800 (300) 6._05 APPROVED YTD REMAINING 476 BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT: COUNCIL Personal Services 12,525 8,455 4,070 Supplies Other Services ✓S, Charges 4,600 4,399 201 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL COUNCIL EXPENSE ---------- ---------- 17,125 12,e54 ---------- 4,271 ADMINISTRATIVE Personal Services 124,450 99,773 24,677 Supplies 4,200 6.193 (1,993) OtherServices G Charges 21,450 13•,980 7,470 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPE N ---------- ---------- 150,100 119,945 ---------- 30.195 TOTAL ELECTIONS EXPENSE FINANCE Pei tmof.i,1 sw"viw» Suppl105 Othor Services G Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL FINANCE EXPENSE TOTAL AUDIT EXPENSE (ASSESSING Formas l Services Supplie 73,475 39,276 36.199 200 484 (2284) 525 727 (202) 76,200 .......... 40,487 .......... 35.713 .......... 11,500 11,800 (300) 6._05 12,433 (5,928) 475 476 (1) 09/16/91 19:12:20 09/16/91 19:12:20 m CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 Other Services & Charges 9,375 4,874 4,501 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL ASSESSING EXPENSE 16.355 17,782 (1,427) TOTAL LEGAL EXPENSE 26,175 14,043 12,132 PLANNING & ZONING Personal Services 32,075 16,834 15,241 Supplies 100 8 92 Other Services & Charges 46,800 11,566 35,232 Capital Outlay Debt Service r Other Uses TOTAL PLANNING & ZONING EX 70.975 28,410 50,565 DATA PROCESSING Personal Services Supplies 1,500 1,764 (264) Other Services & Charges 14,675 7,134 7,541 Capital Outlay 6,650 2,320 4,330 Dobt Service 28.9,0 19,261 9,639 Other Uses ---------- TOTAL DATA PROCESSING EXPE ---------- ---------- 51,725 .......... .......... 30.479 21.246 .......... CITY HALL Personal Services 3,450 .3,030 420 Supplies 2.350 1,152 1,198 Other Services & Charges 25,250 13.508 11.742 Capitol Outlay 20,725 2.644 18,001 Debt Service Other Uses ---------- ---------- TOTAL CITY HALL EXPENSE ---------- 51,775 20,335 31.440 / .......... .......... .......... QPUTY REGISTRAR 09/16/91 19:12:20 m CITY OF MONTICELLO 09/16/91 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 19:12:20 FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 Personal Services 58.625 38,829 19,796 Supplies 50 325 (275) Other Services & Charges 11250 775 475 Capital Outlay 168 (168) Debt Service Other Uses ---------- TOTAL DEPUTY REGISTRAR EXP ---------- ---------- 59.9225 40.096 19.829 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT: 539.855 336.232 203,623 PUBLIC SAFETY: TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT EXPE 172.050 114.696 57.354 FIRE DEPT r Personal Services 61.350 12.648 48,702 Supplies 4.125 3.181 944 Other Services & Charges 28.650 30.374 (1,724) Capita 1 Outlay 55.850 12,800 43.050 Debt Service Othor Uses ---------- TOTAL FIRE DEPT EXPENSE ---------- ---------- 149,975 .�..o.�s.. .......... 59.004 90.971 .......... BUILDING INSPECTIONS Personal Services 29,255 12.526 16.729 Supp l i. ras 325 1.032 ( 707 ) Other Services & Charges 4,850 3.541 1,3.09 Capital Outlay 10,000 10,516 (516) Debt Service Other Uses ----------- TOTAL BLDG INSPECTION EXPE ---------- ---------- 44,430 .......... .......... 27.615 16,815 .......... CIVIL DEFENSE Personal Services 6.200 2.707 3.493 Suppli roa 100 100 OLhrr Services & Charges 625 238 3137 / Capita 1 Outlay LDebt Servico Other Uaos CITY OF MONTICELLO 09/16/91 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 19:12:20 FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 3lAug91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 TOTAL CIVIL DEFENSE EXPENS ---------- 6,925 ---------- 2,945 ---------- 3.980 ANIMAL CONTROL Personal Services Supplies 1,125 1,189 (64) Other Services & Charges 17,925 15.928 1.997 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL EXPEN ---------- 19,050 ---------- 17,117 cc221,377E ---------- 1,933 c TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY: 392,430 171,053 P(' '.IC WORKS: C A/ADMIN & ENGINEERING Personal Services 53,800 34,832 18.968 Supplies 525 385 140 Other Services & Charges 15.650 10,085 5.565 Capital Outlay 900 935 (35) Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL PW/ADMIN & ENGR EXPE ---------- 70,875 ---------- 46,236 ---------- 24,639 1 PW/INSPECTIONS Personal Services 28.225 15,730 12,487 Supplier 350 (350) Other Services & Charges 1,200 571 629 Capital outlay Debt Service Other Uses ---------- TOTAL PW/INSPECTIONS EXPEN 29,425 .......... ---------- 16,658 .......... ---------- 12.767 .......... PW/STREETS & ALLEYS Personal Servicer 96,700 80,412 16,288 i Supplier 37,000 34,118 2,882 Other Services & Charger 10 ,00 5,940 4,260 Capital Outlay 47,500 35,917 11,503 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 Debt Service Other Uses ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL PW/STR & ALLEYS EXPE 191,400 156,387 35.013 PW/ICE & SNOW Personal Services Supplies Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL PW/ICE & SNOW EXPENS ( 'J/SHOP PA GARAGE Personal Services Supplies Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL PW/SHOP & GARAGE EXP PW/PARKING LOTS Personal Services Supplies Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL PW/PARKING LOT EXPEN PW/STREETLIGHTING Personal Services Supplies COther Services & Chargos Capital Outlay Debt Service 3,000 81933 (5,933) 8,600 424 8,176 1,500 1 .500 ---------- 13,100 ---------- 9,357 ---------- 3.743 3,051 (3.051) 5.700 5,063 637 12,500 4,912 7,589 3,400 1,815 1.585 21,600 14,840 6,760 800 800 2,500 546 1,954 125 125 ---------- 3,425 .......... ---------- 546 .......... ---------- 2,879' .......... 300 300 39,700 25,884 13,816 09/16/91 19:12:20 SENIOR CENTER CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY ' 12,902 FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 2,200 7.,445 (245) APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 ---------- Other Uses ---------- ---------- 31.750 .......... ---------- TOTAL PW/STREET LIGHT EXPE ---------- 40,000 25,884 14,116 REFUSE COLLECTION .......... .......... Personal Services 900 1,047 (147) Supplies 6.300 238 6,062 Other Services & Charges 215,050 135,235 79,815 Capital Outlay 300 800 (500) Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL REFUSE COLLECTION EX 222.550 137,320 85,230 c PUBLIC WORKS: a 592.375 407.220 185,147 TOTAL CL rURE & RECREATION: MUSEUM Personal Services 1.850 2,077 (227) Supplies 100 138 (38) Other Services & Charges 2.175 659 1,516 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL MUSEUM EXPENSE 4,125 .........E .......... 2,874 1,251 .......... SENIOR CENTER Personal Services 29,550 16,648 12,902 Supplies Other Services & Charges 2,200 7.,445 (245) Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses ---------- ---------- TOTAL SENIOR CENTER EXPENS ---------- 31.750 .......... 19,093 .......... 12,657 .......... TOTAL COMMUNITY ED EXPENSE 17,000 17,000 .......... .......... .......... OTAL Y.M.C.A. EXPENSE 7,500 5.000 2,500 09/16/91 19:12:20 MISCELLANEOUS/UNALLOCATED: TOTAL UNALLOCATED EXPENSE TOTAL INSURANCE EXPENSE_ 51,025 31.593 19.432 ,• • TOTAL MiSC/UNALLOCATEDi 51 025 31,593 19,432, TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENSE 1.801,005 1.120,480 680,525 . • ••/tlttlttlttl:R ltt tt•tt t►tttttlt •� IERAL FUND EXPENSE SUMMARY 09/16/91 19:12:20 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY (., FOR THE PERIOD 31Aug91 ENDING APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 PARKS & RECREATION Personal Services 90,500 36.479 54,021 Supplies 14,150 11,345 2.805 Other Services & Charges 7,745 5,463 2.282 Capital Outlay 10.350 5,801 4.549 Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL PARKS & REL EXPENSE 122,745 59.087 63,658 TOTAL CULTURE & RECREATION: c183,120 103,054 80.066 URBAN REDEVELOPMENT Fi HOUSING: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT / Personal Services 28,775 ]11,515 12.260 `. Supplies 150 150 Other Services & Charges 13.275 4,480 8.795 Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Usos TOTAL ECON DEVELOPMENT EXP 42.200 20.996 21.204 , TOTAL URBAN REDEVELOPMENT ti ,®` 42,200® „ m2U,996o c., 21.204 MISCELLANEOUS/UNALLOCATED: TOTAL UNALLOCATED EXPENSE TOTAL INSURANCE EXPENSE_ 51,025 31.593 19.432 ,• • TOTAL MiSC/UNALLOCATEDi 51 025 31,593 19,432, TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENSE 1.801,005 1.120,480 680,525 . • ••/tlttlttlttl:R ltt tt•tt t►tttttlt •� IERAL FUND EXPENSE SUMMARY 09/16/91 19:12:20 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 *TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 1.801.005 1,120,480 680,525 ttiitttt#itttit#*tit####tttt#t##tt C 09/16/91 19:12:20 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 t General Government 539,855 336.232 203,623 t Public Safety 392.430 221,377 171,053 t Public Works 592.375 407,228 185,147 * Culture & Recreation 183.120 103.054 60,066 t Urban Redevelopment & Hou 42,200 20,996 21.204 t Misc/Unallocated 51,025 31,593 19,432 *TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 1.801.005 1,120,480 680,525 ttiitttt#itttit#*tit####tttt#t##tt C 09/16/91 19:12:20 CITY OF MONTICELLO 09/16/91 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 19:12:20 FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 TOTAL UDAG FUND EXPENSE LIBRARY FUND Personal Services 3.450 845 2.605 Supplies 2,000 688 1,312 Other Services & Charges 17.925 20.138 (2.213) Capital Outlay 3.125 315 2,810 Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL LIBRARY FUND EXPENSE --------- o _6,500 ------ --- 21.986 ------- - 4,514 HRA (HSG & REDEV AUTH) FUND TIF 01 - IXI 1 2,800 54 2.746 TIF 412 - METCALF & LARSON 4,205 4.284 1 03 - FSI -IF 1F 04 - IXI 4 22.960 22.960 TIF 05 - CONSTRUCTION 5 TIF 06 - RAINDANCE TIF p7 - NAWCO TIF 08 - NSF 1.840 1.840 TIF #9 - TAPPER 15.580 (15.580) TIF N10 - REMMELE 115 (115) TIF 011 - MARTIE FARM SVCS TOTAL HRA FUND EXPENSE 216,170 37,426 178,744 SHADE TREE FUND Personal Services 14,650 8,244 6.406 Supplies 600 827 (227) Other Services & Charges 15,100 6.391 8.709 Capital Outlay 14,000 14,497 (497) Debt Service Other Uses TOTAL SHADE TREE FUND EXPENS 44,350 29,960 14,390 1 TOTAL PARK & REC FUND EXPENS _-..--.... ..-..-o... _ss. -..es- IAL OAA FUND EXPENSE 31,625 13,750 17,875 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 TOTAL CAP PROJ REVOLVING EXP TOTAL ECON DEV AUTH FUND EXP TOTAL SEWER IMPR FUND EXPENS TOTAL WATER IMPR FUND EXPENS WATER FUND Total Unallocated Expenses Admin/Gen Operatinq Personal Services Supplies Other Services G Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses Total Admin/Gen Oper Exp TOTAL WATER FUND EXPENSES SEWER FUND WasLu.atur Tr•uatmmnL Plant Porsonal Servtces Supplies Othor Services b Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses Total WWTP EKponsms Admin/Gen Operating Personal Services Supplies Other Services 6 Charges Capital Outlay APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 27,313 20,692 236,000 ---------- ---------- 71.032 ---------- ---------- 164,968 ---------- ---------- 2.250 220 2.030 95.000 80.027 14,973 54,850 41,545 13,305 30.900 12,976 17,924 48.005 27,313 20,692 7,300 3,681 3.619 ---------- 141.055 ---------- 85.515 ---------- 55.540 .......... ...m...... 141,055 .......... 85.515 55.540 1.175 783 392 5,500 2,675 2,825 352.975 242.798 110.177 ---------- 359,650 .......... ---------- 246,256 .......... ---------- 113.394 .......... 34,225 18,770 15,455 5,G50 7,226 (1,376) 179115 3,690 13,425 9,500 5,251 4,249 09/16/91 19:12:20 CITY OF MONTICELLO YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 31Aug91 Debt Service Other Uses Total Admin/Gen Oper Exp TOTAL SEWER FUND EXPENSES MUNICIPAL LIOUOR FUND Purchasing Personal Ser -vices Supplies Other Services & Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses / Total Purchasing Expense `Admin/Gon OpArating Personal Ser vices Supplies Other Sorviees & Charges Capital Outlay Debt Servic u Other Uses lotal Operations Expense TOTAL LIDUOR FUND EXPENSES TRANSPORTATION FUND Iota] Operating Exponses Administration Personal Se rvicros Supplias Other Servi eas R Charges Capital Outlay Debt Services ...III Other Uses Total Admin istration Exp APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 550 550 ---------- 67,240 ---------- ---------- 34,938 ---------- ---------- 32.302 ---------- 426,69() ---------- 281.194 ---------- 145,696 ---------- 965,650 699,486 266,164 6,000 3.629 2,371 971,650 703,115 268,535 96.950 66,631 30.319 6,900 5,711 1,189 '35,225 38,872 16,353 19,000 3,404 15.596 5,475 4,444 1,031 ---------- 183, nno ---------- 119,061 ---------- 64,489 .......... .......... 1,155,200 .......... .......... 822,176 .......... 333,024 .......... 98,485 35,201 23,284 12,955 6,548 6,407 1,299 1,299 100 (100) ---------- .......... ---------- 6,648 .......... ---------- u ......... 09/16/91 19:12:20 CITY OF MONTICELLO 09/16/91 YTD EXPENSE GUIDELINE SUMMARY 19:12:20 FOR THE PERIOD ENDING �J 31Aug91 APPROVED YTD REMAINING BUDGET POSTED BALANCE 1991 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION FUND EX 72,739 41.849 30,890 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL INVESTMENT HOLDING EXP *ft*t*f f itt**I Rf* f t f t l* It t f t t i t tt Personal Services 989,590 *DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE SUMMARY: 376,690 * * Personal Services 1.106,074 797,454 * Supplies * Other Services & Charges * Other Services & Charges 941,950 438,800 * Capital Outlay Capital Outlay 539,600 * Debt Service 1,780,500 1,722,666 57,834 t Other Uses 1,841,960 1,746.211 ---------- *TOTAL DEBT SVC FUND EXPEN 1.780.500 ---------- 1.722,666 ---------- 57,834 170,510 4,444 L66.066 tti*ttYf *tttt*►fttttit*ttttf*►ft "AL EXI?f_NSFS - ALL FUNDS ---------- 6 ......0.. *CAP PROJ EXPENDITURE SUMMARY: ---------- ........5. * Personal Services * Supplies t Other Services ►, Charges 26.602 (26,602) * Capital Outlay 87 (87) t Debt Service * Other Uses ---------- *TOTAL CAP PROJ FUND EXPEN .......... ---------- 26.688 .......... ---------- (26.688) .......... It1*►ttl*f tittitttlti tt*tltlttt►►tt111tt tf it/It►Itl*ttfttt*Ifttlttlttittltttttttt ti $EXPENDITURE SUMMARY - ALL FUNDS: I Personal Services 989,590 612.900, 376,690 * SUpplims 1.106,074 797,454 309,420 * Other Services & Charges 1,380,750 941,950 438,800 t Capital Outlay 539,600 252,011 287,589 * Debt S®rvice 1,841,960 1,746.211 95,749 t Other Uses 170,510 4,444 L66.066 (( "AL EXI?f_NSFS - ALL FUNDS ---------- 6 ......0.. ---------- ......... ---------- ........5. Bidder Name Ziegler Power Systems 901 West 94th Street Minneapolis, MN 55420 Flaherty Equip. Corp. 750 First Street SW New Brighton, MN 55112 Interstate Detroit Diesel Inc. 2501 East 80th St. Minneapolis, MN 55425 Cummins Diesel Sales Inc. 2690 Cleveland Ave. N. PO Box 64578 St. Paul, MN 55164-0578 Olson Electric Monticello, MN 55362 •Alternate Bid BID TABULATION 125 kW PORTABLE POWER GENERATOR Monday, June 10, 1991 - 10:00 a.m. Bid Amount $42,759.00 $33,925.00 - $29,375.00 $34,995.00 Make & Model Cat 3304T Cummine/Onan 125 DGEA (alt. housing cover) Interstate -Kohler 125 R02D Delivery Bid Bond 90 days K - 58 60 days Cashier's Check 84 days K - 58