City Council Agenda Packet 11-25-1991AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, November 25, 1991 - 7:00 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen, Clint Herbst,
Brad Fyle
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held November 12,
1991.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Public hearing on adoption of 1992 budget and consideration of
a resolution setting the 1992 tax levy.
5. Consideration of a zoning ordinance amendment modifying the
B-1 (neighborhood commercial) zoning district regulations by
eliminating convenience store and laundromat uses as a
permitted use and instead allowing said uses as conditional
uses in the B-1 zone.
6. Consideration of a request to rezone Lot 1, Block 4, River
i_ Terrace, also known as West Side Market, from R-1 (single
family residential) zoning designation to B-1 (neighborhood
business). Applicants, Tom Holthaus and Matt Holker.
7. Consideration of a request to rezone the easterly 9.7 acres of
Auditors Subdivision, Lot 17, from B-3 (highway business) to
a combination of PZM (performance zone mixed) and B-2 (limited
business). Applicant, Evangelical Covenant Church.
B. Consideration of replacement of power band saw for the public
works shop.
9. Consideration of purchase of automatic control for water
system using old tower.
10. Consideration of purchasing 79 extra 65 -gallon carts for the
garbage program.
11. Consideration of a request for an extension of the completion
date for the sanitary sower hookup--Wost Kjoilborgs Mobile
Home Park.
12. Consideration of bilis for the month of November.
ii. Adjournment.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, November 12, 1991 - 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Ken Maus, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brad
Fyle, Dan Blonigen
Members Absent: None
2. Approval of minutes.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Clint Herbst to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting held October 28, 1991. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
None forthcoming.
4. Consideration of a request to rezone the easterly 9.7 acres of
Auditors Subdivision, Lot 17, from B-3 (highway business) to
a combination of PZM (performance zone mixed) and B-2 (limited
business). Applicant, Evangelical Covenant Church.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill Informed Council that the
applicant for the rezoning requests that this item be
postponed and considered at the next regular meeting of the
City Council. Council then tabled the item.
5. Consideration of recommending approval of preliminary plat and
final plat of the East View residential subdivision.
Applicant, Investors Toqether--Dean Hoglund and Ken Schwartz.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the East View plat
proposal and informed Council that the preliminary plat of the
subdivision has been recommended for approval by the Planning
Commission, as the subdivision design moots the design
requirements noted in the City's subdivision ordinance.
O'Neill went on to note that the method for satisfying the
park dedication requirement was the most controversial aspect
of this plat when reviewed by the Planning Commission.
O'Noill noted that tho Planning Commission had concern about
accepting the 2.8 -acro parcel of land between County Road 39
and the Mississippi River as park dedication because 1) the
location of the park requires that neighborhood users cross a
busy county road, 2) development of off-street parking will be
difficult due to the low flood plain elevation of the proposed
park land, and 3) the neighborhood needs may require
Page I
Council Minutes - 11/12/91
development of a standard park featuring playground equipment,
ballfields, etc. It will be impossible to develop this type
of park at the site proposed.
In light of the problems above, the Planning Commission
referred the matter to the Parks Commission. The Parks
Commission reviewed the matter and was generally supportive of
the concept of taking the land as park land; however, it was
their view that the land should be under the domain of the
Department of Natural Resources, and it should be the goal of
the City to sell the land to the DNR and use the proceeds in
payment of the cash requirement in lieu of dedication of land.
After receiving the Parks Commission recommendation, the
Planning Commission met again to discuss the topic. After
considerable discussion, the Planning Commission recommended
to the Council that Council approve the preliminary plat and
accept Outlet S, not as a park dedication area but accept the
outlot as land to be sold to the Department of Natural
Resources. In addition to providing the land to the City for
resale by the City, the developers must provide $3,500, or
one-half the park dedication amount in the form of a letter of
credit, to the City to be held for a period of 18 months
during which time the City will negotiate with the DNR
regarding the sale of the land. If the City is unable to sell
the land, than the City can draw on the letter of credit. The
recommendation proposes that the City and developers share the
risk that the DNR will not buy the property for an amount
equal to the park dedication fee. If the land is sold in
excess of $7,000, then the City and the developer would split
this amount. O'Neill notod that the developers support the
Planning Commission's recommendation.
Councilmember 02onigon didn't feel that the City would come
close to getting $7,000 for the property; therefore, the City
would not obtain the full $7,000 park dedication cash amount.
He noted that the ordinance calls for the City obtaining
usable land or money. This is not usable land, and the
Planning Commission's recommendation will only give the City
one-half of the money normally required with the plat.
Ken Maus noted that people have tried to give the City swamp
land for park land, but 2.8 acres of beautiful river front
property is a long way from being swamp land. It's land that
can be appreciated by the public, and the Planning
Commission's recommendation is a reasonable compromise.
Page 2
�J
Council Minutes - 11/12/91
After discussion, a motior, was made by Brad Fyle and seconded
by Shirley Anderson to approve the preliminary and final plat
of the East- View residential subdivision subject to the
following conditions
1. County surveyor approval of the final plat.
2. Prior to placing City signatures on the final plat,
the City must be provided a 100 -foot easement area
across Outlot A for storm water drainage purposes
as described in the preliminary plat.
3. In conjunction with final platting, the developer
must prepare and record an access easement document
affecting Lots 3 and 4.
4. Restrictive covenants must be recorded at the time
of final platting.
5. Park Dedication Requirement. The City shall accept
as park dedication a warranty deed to Outlot B
along with a letter of credit in the amount of
$3,500. The City shall make its best effort to
sell Outlot B. In the event the selling price is
less than $7,000, the City of Monticello will draw
from the letter of credit an amount equal to one-
half of the difference between the selling price of
the land and the cash requirement of $7,000. In
the event the selling price is equal to $7,000, the
City shall return the $3,500 letter of credit to
the developer. The City and developer shall evenly
divide revenue obtained in the sale of Outlot B
--hat exceeds $7,000. The City shall be solely
responsible for determining the terms of sale of
Outlot B.
In the event the sale of Outlot B does not occur
prior to expiration of the letter of credit, the
City, at its discretion, may draw tho full amount
of the letter of credit or the City may request
that the letter of credit be renewed. In the event
tho developer fails to ronow the letter of credit
as requested, the developer will be in default
under Its obligations, and the City shall be
entitled to draw against said Lotter of credit for
Its entire stated amount.
6. Adjustments to final plat must be made as noted
prior to City signatures.
Page 3
-
Council Minutes - 11/12/91
In the motion, Fyle noted that under item A6, Outlot 8 is
being accepted by the City in lieu of cash to be sold to
another party and is not considered to he a land area
dedicated for public use at this time. voting in favor of the
motion: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Ken Maus. Opposed: Dan
Blonigen. Abstaining: Clint Herbst.
6. Consideration of a request to rezone a 7 -acre parcel described
as Part of Lot 2, Section 18, Township 121, Ranqe 24, Wright
County, Minnesota, from AO (agricultural) zoninq to R-1
(single family) and R-2 (single and two-family) zoning.
Applicants, Dean Hoqlund and Ken Schwartz.
O'Neill informed Council that the rezoning request proposes
that four parcels earmarked for single family development as
part of the East View subdivision be zoned for R-1 or single
family uses. The zoning district designation is consistent
with this type of land use and should, therefore, be approved.
The balance of the property, or Outlot A, is proposed to be
developed under the R-2 (single and two-family) designation,
which allows for development of townhome units. The land area
contained in Outlot A is large enough to allow for 24
individual housing units to be placed on the site.
O'Neill. noted that access to Outlot A will, be provided by a
single driveway access. An internal driveway system will be
needed to develop and serve individual townhome units on the
site. Maintenance of this internal driveway system will need
to be done privately and will likely be controlled through a
townhome association. At the time of development, Outlot A
will need to be platted, at which time the City will require
documentation that a townhome association is established along
with documentation of proper access easements. O'Neill also
noted that future development proposals at this site involving
townhome development will be reviewed by the Planning
Commission and City Council via the conditional use permit
process.
Ken Maus stated that the area is ideal for townhome
development. He noted that there are very few townhome
developments with a view of the river.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Dan Blonigen to recommend approval of the proposed
rezoning request based on the finding that the proposal is
consistent with the comprehensive plan, is consistent with the
geography and character of the adjoining land, and the need
Page 4
Council Minutes - 11/12/41
for the rezoning has been sufficiently demonstrated. Voting
in favor of the motion: Shirley Anderson, Dan Slonigen, Brad
Fyle, Ken Maus. Opposed: Brad Fyle.
SEE ORDINANCE P.ME!`IDMENT Nn. 215.
Consideration of approving Chamber Reimbursement Agreement for
the Information Center improvements.
Administrator Wolfsteller reported that the agreement as
drafted should allow the Chamber the ability to reimburse the
City for all of the improvement costs associated with
upgrading the Information Center. The Chamber has agreed to
be responsible for all of the improvement costs even if the
Chamber chooses to relocate before the end of the 10 -year
lease period. The City also has the right under this
agreement to terminate the agreement after five years. This
provision allows the City the opportunity to ask the Chamber
to move if the City determines it has a better use for the
property because of redevelopment or another public purpose.
He noted that in all likelihood, there may not be any reason
to terminate after five years, but it does give the City the
option if necessary.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Clint Herbst to approve the Chamber Reimbursement
Agreement for Information Center improvements. Motion carried
unanimously.
Consideration of amendinq provisions within Cardinal Hills and
Briar Oakes development agreemonts.
Administrator Wolfsteller reported that because of last week's
unexpected storm of the century, the construction of projects
occurring with Cardinal Hills and Briar Oakes Estate
developments have tomo to a halt. In both developments,
sanitary sower and water mains have boon completed, but it
does not appear feasible to continue construction of the
bituminous paving within either development. The Cardinal
Hills plat does have curb and gutter installed, and curbing
was scheduled for last Friday but was terminated because of
the snow storm.
Wolfsteilor reported that it was determined that the
contractor could be responsible for additional costs
associated with preparing the streets for paving next spring.
This is their responsibility primarily because the project
completion date was October 15, which moans that the
improvements actually should have boon in place before the
snow storm hit. The City is eompoiled to plow those streets
Page 5
GO
Council Minutes- 11/12141
this winter because we allowed building permits to be issued,
and it is likely that some of the homes will be occupied prior
to completion of final paving.
Woifslellee vient - V- 2-1, that since +r, xnpears unlikely that
the weather will allow any paving to be completed yet this
fall, it seems reasonable to make an exception to our normal
policy and allow occupancy to take place without the streets
being completed. Actual paving may not be able to be
completed until the end of May or early June next year. There
could be as many as a dozen or more homes ready to be occupied
by early next year. As long as the City is not responsible
for any damage to the road base that may occur because of our
plowing activities, City staff is comfortable with amending
our development agreement.
John Simola noted that the City met with the contractors and
noted that we would do normal snowplowing but that's it. We
will make our bent efforts to keep the roads clear. He also
noted that none of the utility structures or standpipes are
sticking up above the road surface that could create a problem
with snowplowing.
Clint Herbst asked if we are setting a precedent by plowing
the streets and allowing occupancy to occur prior to final
completion of the streets.
Shirley Anderson noted that this is certainly a unique
situation created primarily by the snow storm. It was her
view that the circumstances were a valid reason for varying
from our City policy.
Bret Weiss noted that in some cities, they actually wait a
winter prior to placing bituminous surface over the road bed.
This allows the roadbed to settle over the winter, which can
ultimately lead to a firmer roadbed and a bettor, longer
lasting roadway.
Kon Maus noted that since other cities allow roads to be used
prior to paving, it does not appear to be an exceedingly
unusual situation and perhaps is an opportunity for the City
to try something different. Furthermore, we certainly led the
developers to believe that Monticello is willing to work with
them in development of their residential developments. It was
Kon's view that we should allow occupancy to take place, and
the City should maintain the roadways through the winter.
Paqo 6
Council Minutes - 11/12/91
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and
seconded by Brad Fyle to approve an amendment to the
development agreements with Briar Oakes and Cardinal Hills
developments allowing occupancy of homes issued building
permits without the streets being completed. This amendment
is subject to the oeveloper reimbursing the City fcr J; da=agc
to City equipment due to plowing of streets prior to
completion; 2) Contractor is responsible for correcting
problems with the roadbed that might occur during wet periods.
This would include blading the roadbed and providing
additional subgrade material it necessary to stabilize the
roadway; 3) Any damage to items already installed by the
contractor shall be repaired by the contractor. Motion
carried unanimously.
9. Consideration of approving partial payment and accepting
performance bond for fire hall painting contract--Lindberq 6,
Associates.
Administrator Wolfsteller informed Council that Lindberg b
Associates did not complete the fire hall painting contract
according to specifications, and Wolfsteller requested that
Council consider accepting the work as it was performed or
require Lindberg to complete the project as specified, which
would include removing all material on the east side and re -do
the staining accordingly.
After discussion, a motion was made by Dan Blonigen and
seconded by Clint Herbst to approve a partial payment totaling
$6,000, which is a $2,000 reduction from their contract,
contingent on Lindberg providing a performance bond totaling
an additional $2,800 to guarantee the east wall of the
building is redone in the spring according to specifications
if it needs to be redone at that time. Motion carried
unanimously.
10. Consideration of bids for traffic signal at the intersection
of CSAR 75, CSAR 39, and CR 118, and consideration of award.
John Simola, Public Works Director, informed Council that tho
low bid has come in at $8,000 loss than expected. This bid
was submitted by Wright Electric in the amount of $60,950. It
was John Simola's recommendation that the City award the bid
to Wright Electric.
Pago 7
J
Council Minutes - 11/12/91
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Dan Blonigen to award the CSAR 75, CSAH 39, and
County Road 118 traffic signal Project No. 1991-4 to Wright
Electric in the amount of $60,950. Motion carried
unanimously.
There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
I
Page 8
Council Agenda - 11125/91
4. Public hearinq on adoption of 1992 budqet and consideration of
a resolution setting the 1992 tax levv. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As part of the truth in taxation requirements, the City is
required to hold a public hearing on the adoption of the i952
budget and resulting tax levy. The actual tax levy adopted by
the City Council must be submitted to the county auditor's
office by December 30 to meet the guidelines.
At the October 28 Council meeting, it was the consensus of the
Council that the proposed budget resulting in a tax levy of
$2,791,263 would be proposed at the public hearing. This
amounts to an approximate 2.1% increase over last year's tax
levy and is the maximum allowable for the City.
While the public comments are encouraged and welcomed, it is
the Council's authority to determine the actual tax levy
increase needed to fund City operations. Changes in the
proposed budget can still be made at Monday's meeting if
desired; and if additional time is needed by the Council
before setting the tax levy, the meeting can be continued
until 7:00 p.m., Wednesday, December S. I do not expect a
2.16 increase to be controversial, as this only amounts to a
$38,485 increase over 19911s tax levy.
The only change I have made to the proposed budget reviewed at
the October 28 Council meeting is the addition of an estimated
$35,000 for the city hall parking lot expansion project. This
expenditure is proposed to be transferred from the liquor
store fund in that we are not able to increase our tax levy
for this improvement. I had not shown this expenditure in
your previous budget summaries. As was noted during the
previous review of the budget, the budget should be considered
merely a working document and projection of anticipated
revenues and expenditures for next year, and major items would
naturally be again considered by the Council before purchases
are actually made.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
After the close of the public hearing, the Council should
adopt the resolution setting the tax levy requirements
for next year at $2,791,263, the maximum allowed.
2. The Council could adopt a tax levy that is loss than the
amount proposed but in no case higher than the
$2,791,263.
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The City staff recommends that the tax levy be adopted at the
maximum allowed, $2,791,263. The budget as proposed will
still require the use of $85,000 from the liquor store
operations if all of the budgeted expenditures are actually
made. As a result, I do not recommend that the proposed tax
levy be reduced, and I believe a 2.18 increase is minimal.
Any reductions in our tax levy would require our fund balance
surpluses to be used to fund proposed expenditures.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution; City tax comparison for various valued
properties; Capital outlay summary; Budget summary; Revenue
sources; Expenditures by activity; General fund summary; Debt
service fund summary; Tax levy summary; Maximum levy limit
calculations; Tax levy determination table.
_ ,Q
RESOLUTION 91 -
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1991 BUDGET AND
SETTING THE TAX LEVY
WHEREAS, the City Administrator has prepared and submitted to the
City Council a budget setting forth therein his estimated needs of
tha C cf u^ -.•'cell^ fcr all nr,Prnttons and the debt service for
the fiscal year commencing January 1, 1992, and;
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the same and has made such
changes therein as appear to be in the best interest of the City of
Monticello;
NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MONTICELLO that the budget so submitted by the City Administrator,
together with the changes made therein by the City Council, be and
same hereby is adopted as a budget for the fiscal year commencing
January 1, 1992, and;
DE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Monticello
that there be and hereby is levied for the fiscal year commencing
January 1, 1992, and the following sums for the respective purposes
indicated therein upon the taxable property of the City of
Monticello, to wlt:
'- REVENUE
General
$1,499,653
Library
29,236
OAA
30,625
HRA
13,075
Tree
27,375
Transportation
17,688
DEPT RETIREMENT
Dopt Service Fund
981,907
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Capital Improvement
Revolving 191,704
TOTAL TAX LEVY $2,791,263
The above resolution was Introduced by Councilmembor ,
was duly seconded by Counciimomber , with the
following voting In favor thoroof:
The following voting in the opposition:
Resolution 91 -
Page 2
The City Administrator is hereby instructed to transmit a certified
copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Wright County,
Minnesota.
Adopted thlZ; 5th ,.a-; of .. .c brr, 1991
Mayor
City Administrator
0
SUMMARY
PROPOSED 1992 BUDGETED
CAPITAL OUTLAY ITEMS
City Hall
Parking lot expansion project
$35,000
Capital
outlay
Plain paper fax machine
4,000
General
Fund
Brick repair & sealing
15,000
General
Fund
Filing cabinets
11500
General
Fund
Desk dividers
11800
General
Fund
$57,300
Parks
$ 2,000
General Fund
puory 36 software
West Bridge Park restrooms & parking lot
$60,000
Cap. Outlay Fund
Demolish Info. Center restrooms
3,000
General
Fund
Paint and stucco Information Center
11500
General
Fund
Lighting (2) softball fields
80,000
Cap. Outlay Fund
(3) bleachers -- softball fields
3,600
General
Fund
Tree planting
5,000
General
Fund
Picnic tables
2,500
General
Fund
Kiosk - Information Center area
51000
General
Fund
Landscaping at Information Center
3,000
General
Fund
$163,600
Shade Tree
i_ Chain saw $ 500 Tree Fund
Tree replacements 11000 Tree Fund
$ 1,500
Street
Replacement for 1981 Chev truck
$62,000
Cap. Outlay Fund
Sealcoating program
38,000
General Fund
1 -ton truck with flat bed
24,000
Cap. Outlay Fund
Sidewalk program
28,500
Cap. outlay Fund
Additional funds for C.R. 75, 118,
and 39 traffic signals
12,500
Cap. Outlay Fund
$165,000
Data Processinq
Tape drive backup system
$ 2,000
General Fund
puory 36 software
375
General Fund
Accounts receivable software
3,600
General Fund
Printer font cartridge 6 increased memory
11500
General Fund
Programming for parcoltbidg permit system
51000
General Fund
$12,475
Library
t Overhead projector $ 11000 Library Fund
VCR 425 Library Fund
Unallocatod 1,375 Library Fund
$ 2,600
Summary
1992 Capital Outlay Items
Page 2
Fire
(4) SCBA air packs $ 51600
Ventilation fan 1,200
Truck mount cascaoe tanks1,"i0o
(3) radios 1,600
Air -powered rescue tool kit 800
Slice pak cutting unit 700
Refurbish unit #1163 (re -paint b
re -line tank) 12,000
$23,600
Inspections
Locator
$ 650
General Fund
Water
Leak detection headphones
$ 1,400
Water
Fund
Remodel pump house #1,
relocate fluoride in chlorine room
1,000
Water
Fund
Chlorine scale, pump house #1
1,300
Water
Imp. Fund
Chlorine alarm, pump houses #1 S #2
3,000
Water
Imp. Fund
Control system, old water tower
4,500
Water
Imp. Fund
Used 1 -ton pickup with boom b utility box
12,000
water
Imp. Fund
$23,200
Sewer
Safety boom
S 3,800
Sewer
Fund
Sonic boeper
300
Sewer
Fund
S 4,100
Refuse
Disposal tipping fee increase
$65,000
General Fund
Roll -around containers
15,000
General Fund
$80,000
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Drying beds
$10,000
Sewer
Imp. Fund
GRAND TOTAL PROPOSED
$509,225
C)
11
1992 BUDGET SUMMARY
1992
1991
FUND
REVENUE
EXPENDITURES
REVENUE
EXPENDITURES
General
$1,853,353
$1,853,353
$1,801,005
$1,801,005
Library
29,736
29,276
26,500
26,500
Transportation
72,182
72,182
72,739
72,739
Shade Tree
32,875
32,875
44,350
44,350
UDAG
14,800
-0-
13,925
-0-
OAA
30,625
30,625
31,625
31,625
HRA
351,450
282,095
278,850
216,170
EDA
11,215
2,360
10,850
2,250
Debt Service
1,654,929
1,671,500
1,652,503
1,780,500
Liquor
1,373,950
1,306,950
1,269,250
1,155,200
(-,ater
141,425
139,670
141,055
141,055
Sewer
447,840
447,840
426,890
426,890
Capital Imp.
301,504
302,000
167,254
236,000
Water Imp.
12,400
20,800
11,100
-0-
Sewer Imp.
11,300
10,000
14,800
95,000
TOTAL
$6,339,584
$6,201,526
$5,982,696
$6,029,284
11
A
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
1992 BUDGET
REVENUE
Taxes
Current Ad Valorem
$1,499,653
Penalty/interest
51000
$1,504,653
Licenses and Permits - Business
Liquor
16,750
Beer
1,675
Set Ups
325
$
18,750
Licenses and Permits - Non -Business
Building Permits
40,000
Variances/Conditional Uses
1,500
Dog Licenses
200
Others
2,000
$
43,700
Inter -Governmental
Fire Department Aid
30,600
Police Department Aid
18,500
$
49,100
Charqes for Services
General Government
700
Public Safety (Township Contract)
49,000
Streets - C.S.A.H. Mtnc.
4,000
Deputy Registrar
75,000
Other
750
Subdivision Fees
250
Special Processing Fee (Garbage)
4,000
Recycling Incentive
4,800
Inspection Fees
8,000
$
146,500
Fines
Animal Impoundment
12,000
$
12,000
Miscellaneous Revenue
Interest on Investments
65,000
Salo of Property
50
Contributions/Donations/
Park Dedications
2,400
Other
200
$
67,650
Refunds and Reimbursements
IDC Reimbursement
11,000
$
11,000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $1,853,353
01-
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
1992 BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
Mayor and Council
$ 19,525
Administration
164,300
Finance
78,300
Insurance
53,325
Audit
13,000
Legal
24,175
Planning & Zoning
36,520
Inspections --Bldg. Official
34,865
Assessing
17,420
Deputy Registrar
63,075
City Hall
51,455
Computer
33,350
Elections
4,010
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
$ 593,320
Law Enforcement
$190,350
Fire
124,933
Civil Defense
7,145
Animal Control
22,925
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY
$ 345,353
Inspection
$ 30,725
Admin. 6 Engineering
71,470
Streets 6 Alloys
201,640
Snow 5 Ice
13,600
Street Lighting
43,900
Public Parking Lots
1,200
Shop 6 Garage
17,250
Refuse Collection
281,400
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
$ 661,185
Senior Citizens Center
i 38,800
YMCA/Community Ed.
24,500
Information Center/Musoum
3,750
TOTAL HEALTH S WELFARE
3 67,050
Parke 6 Rec./Comotery
$146,355
TOTAL PARKS 6 RECREATION
S 146,355
Community Devolopmont
S 40,090
Cable Communications
-0-
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEI-1
$ 49,090
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
$1,853,353
0
SUMMARY
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
1992 BUDGET FORECAST
REVENUE:
Current Ad Valorem $ 981,907
Interest 106,600
Spec. Asmt.--County 340,722
Transfer In --Tax Inc. 225,700
TOTAL REVENUE $1,654,929
EXPENDITURES:
Principal $1,005,000
Interest 612,971
Paying Agent Fees 11,029
Int. Exp. --Fund Deficits 42,500
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,671,500
0
TAX LEVY SUMMARY
1992 BUDGET
ALL FUNDS
Fund
Payable 1992
Payable 1991
8 Change
General
$1,499,653
$1,444,290
Library
29,236
26,400
Transportation
17,688
19,787
Shade Tree
27,375
39,135
OAA
30,625
30,225
HRA
13,075
19,250
Debt Service
981,907
1,021,937
Capital Imp. Revolving
191,704
151,754
TOTAL
$2,791,263
$2,752,778
1.48
Certified Levy Increase - $38,485
Payable
1983
Mill Rate
20.978
Payable
1984
Mill Rate . . . . .
. . . 17.734
Payable
1985
Mill Rate . . . . .
. . . 18.874
Payable
1986
Mill Rate . . . . .
. . . 15.689
Payable
1987
Mill Rate . . . . .
. . . 15.715
Payable
1988
Mill Rate . . . . .
. . . 15.932
Payable
1989
Tax Capacity Rate .
. . . 13.283
Payable
1990
Tax Capacity Rate .
. . . 16.187
Payable
1991
Tax Capacity Rate .
. . . 15.511
Payable
1992
Tax Capacity Rate
. . 16.492
Assessed
Valuation
Mill Rate
Tax Levy
'82/Payable 1983
$
58,492,537
20.978
$1,227,064
'83/Payable 1984
71,114,939
17.734
1,260,475
'84/Payable 1985
79,954,554
18.874
1,509,003
'85/Payable 1986
100,568,378
15.689
1,577,250
'86/Payable 1987
106,722,013
15.715
1,676,900
'87/Payable 1988
114,339,670
15.932
1,821,370
Tax
Tax
Capacity
Value Capacity Rate
Tax Levy
'88/Payable 1989
$
15,405,139
14.283
$2,198,008
'89/Payable 1990
15,873,242
16.187
2,568,106
'90/Payable 1991
16,161,043
15.511
2,506,132•
'91/Payablo 1992
15,513,574
16.492
2,558,554•
Actual levy collected from taxpayers --balance received from state in
RACA aid payments ($232,709)
0
MAXIMUM LEVY LIMIT CALCULATIONS
Levy limit established by state
Special levies
Library
Bonded Debt
Maximum Levy Limit
Actual Levy Adopted/ Proposed
Proposed Increase
Proposed Levy Increase/Decrease by Fund
General
+ $55,363
Library
+ 2,836
Transportation
- 2,099
Tree
- 11,760
OAA
+ 400
HRA
- 6,175
Debt (Bonds)
- 40,030
Capital Outlay Rev.
+ 39,950
NET
$38,485 1.48
1991
1992
$1,780,120
$1,780,120
26,400
29,236
1,021,937
981,907
$2,828,457
$2,791,263
$2,752,778
$2,791,263
$ 38,485
0
CITY OF MONTICELLO
TRUTH IN TAXATION
TAX LEVY DETER14INATION TABLE
1991
1. CERTIFIED LEVY
2. HACA
3. EQUALIZATION AID
4. FISCAL DISPARITY TAX
5. TAX LEVY (1-2-3-4)
1
1992 X CHANGE
2,752,778 2.791.267 N/A
246,646 2321709 N/A
H/A
H/A
2,506,132 2.558,554 +2.1%
NOTESs —1991 LEVY AND AID AMOUNTS ARE FINAL AMOUNTS.
—1992 LEVY AMOUNTS ARE PROPOSED AMOUNTS.
—1992 AID AMOUNTS ARE FINAL AMOUNTS.
—THE 1991 AND�1992 TAX LEVY AMOUNTS SHOWN ON LINE 5
AND THE 1991 TO 1992 PERCENTAGE CHANGE ALSO SHOWN
ON LINE 5 ARE THE AMOUNTS AND PERCENTAGE TO BE SHOWN
ON THE TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLISHED HEARING NOTICE.
FOR CITIES WITH A POPULATION OF 1,000 OR LESS, THESE
ARE THE AMOUNTS AND PERCENTAGE TO BE SHOWN ON THEIR
POSTED NEARING NOTICES.
—N/A MEANS NOT APPLICABLE.
WRIGHT
REVENUE SOURCES - ALL FUNDS
Taxes
Tax increment revenue
Licenses and permits
Charges for services
Fines and penalties
Transfers between funds
Interest income
Miscellaneous revenue
Liquor sales
Refunds and reimbursements
Special assessments
Inter -governmental revenue
1992
$2,791,263
325,175
63,950
646,824
18,500
279,300
271,515
7,475
1,334,350
11,000
355,922
199,860
TOTAL $6,305,134
1991
$2,760,778
246,300
63,525
716,170
9,000
165,034
270,600
12,150
1,255,700
11,000
364,597
107,842
$5,982,696
j
EXPENDITURES BY ACTIVITY
ALL FUNDS
1992
1991
Personal services
$ 972,592
$ 989,590
Supplies
169,873
141,224
Other services and
charges 1,531,036
1,374,750
Capital outlay
479,225
539,600
Debt service
1,671,500
1,841,960
Transfers between
funds 279,300
170,510
Liquor products
1,028,000
971,650
TOTAL $6,131,526 $6,029,284
OZ/
CITY TAX COMPARISION
1991 VS. 1992
Assuming a 2.18 increase in our tax levy for 1992, the following
are examples of the dollar increase to be expected for typical
residential and commercial property:
Residential Home
City Taxes
City Taxes
Valued At:
Payable 1991
Payable 1992
$ 75,000
$127.19
$128.64
85,000
158.21
161.62
100,000
204.75
211.09
125,000
305.57
301.80
Commercial/Industrial
City Taxes
City Taxes
Property Valued At:
Payable 1991
Payable 1992
$ 801000
$397.08
$409.00
125,000
688.30
707.09
01
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
Consideration of a zoning ordinance amendment modifyinq the
B-1 (neighborhood commercial) zoning district requldtions by
eliminatinq convenience store and laundromat uses as a
Permitted use and instead allowing said uses as conditional
uses in the B-1 zone. ( J.Q. )
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you recall, the Planning Commission voted to recommend
denial of the West Side Market owner's requeet to rezone the
West Side Market site from R-1 to B-1 zoning district
designation. The denial recommendation was based on the
finding that the rezoning would constitute spot zoning.
In turn, on October 15, 1991, the City Council reviewed the
matter and developed an interesting alternative which
essentially represents a compromise between the owner's desire
to more freely use his land for commercial use and the desire
of the local residents to limit the size of the operation.
The idea, which is the basis of the proposed ordinance
amendment, consists of amending the zoning ordinance by
allowing convenience stores and laundromats to operate on a
limited basis as a conditional use in the B-1 zone.
Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance amendment
allowing convenience stores to operate in the B-1 zone as a
conditional use and present it to the Planning Commission for
further review and public comment. This stop has been
completed, and the Planning Commission has recommended that
the ordinance amendment be denied. It was their view that the
conditional use permit requirement does not sufficiently
protect the residential character of the neighborhood.
Planning Commission was not swayed by the argument that the
conditional use permit requirement establiehea the proper
balance between the neighborhood's desires for control of the
convenience store expansion and the need the owner has to use
his property more frooly.
Impact of Proposed Ordinance Amendment
Under the proposed ordinance establishing convenionco stores
as a conditional use in the B-1 zone, conditions aro
established that limit the size and manner of operation of
convenience stores in tho B-1 zone. In addition to adding
controls that help to mitigate the negative Impact of the
store on the noighborhood, the amendment provides the City
with leverage in helping obtain concessions from the owner
that could improve the Site configuration. For instance, if
the Council had merely rezoned the site to B-1 as originally
proposed, the owner would have boon able to develop the site
In a manner conaiatont with the minimum requirements of the
ordinance, and the City would, therefore, have boon unable to
require that any additional conditions be mot that might
Improve traffic safety or limit impact on the neighborhood.
If convenience stores aro allowed as a conditional use as the
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
ordinance amendment proposes, the City can require that the
driveway access points be changed to improve traffic flow and
safety.
A number of conditions are included in the ordinance that will
apply to this site if the ordinance is adopted. One of the
more significant conditions limits the size of the structure
to 3,000 sq ft. The present square footage of the West Side
Market structure is 1,876 sq ft. The ordinance amendment
results in the potential of expanding the structure by
1,124 sq ft or 400. If the site was rezoned to B-1 without
the conditional use permit amendment, the total size of the
structure could far exceed 3,000 sq ft. Please review the
zoning ordinance for a description of all of the conditions
under which convenience stores and laundromats must operate.
To assist you in determining whether or not to include
convenience store activity as a conditional use only in the
B-1 zone, I have included the definition of a convenience
store below. Please note that by its definition, convenience
stores may sell "auto fuels and lubricants..' Council may be
concerned that gasoline sales in a B-1 (neighborhood
commercial) zone may be innappropriate without certain limits.
If so, Council may wish to add another condition to the list
of conditions noted that controls the number of dispensers
allowed at a convenience store in a B-1 zone.
CONVENIENCE STORE: A retail store not more than 4,000 sq
ft in area that generally carries a reduced inventory of
a variety of items such as dairy products, auto fuels and
lubricants and other minor automobile related items,
groceries, novelties, magazines, etc. A convenience
store may be combined with a motor fuel station (see
definition - Motor Fuel Station/Convenience Store).
Following are two examples of additional conditions that could
be added to the list of conditions governing convenience store
oporation in a B-1 zone:
1. Gas dispensers are allowed on a limited basis with one
gas dispenser allowed per every 200 square feet of
associated enclosed convenience store floor area. For
purposes of defining a dispenser, a single gasoline hoso
Is considered as being one dispenser.
The floor area is that portion of a building devoted to
tho convenience store activity. Usually, floor area is
oqual to 90t of the total square foot aroa enclosed by
the building. In the case of the West Side Market, tho
total floor area is 1,607 sq ft. The formula above is
equal to the present ratio of gas dispensers (8) per
floor aroa (1,607 sq. ft. floor area) presently found at
the west Side Market. In the event the convenience store
expands, under this alternative, gas disponsors could be
added only at the same ratio as expansion of the
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
convenience store floor area. In this case, if the store
expanded by its maximum amount allowed under the
conditional use permit (409), then the total number of
dispensers could increase in a like percentage, which
would result in potential for an additional three
dispensers. Please note that there are two dispensers for
each pump at the site. Unless one can install three
dispensers with one pump, this language in effect limits
the store to being allowed to add two dispensers.
2. Gas dispensers at any single convenience store site in a
B-1 zone is limited to a total of eight dispensers.
Council may wish to limit the number of gas dispensers to
the present number of eight. This would eliminate the
potential development of additional gas dispensers.
Following is a quick review of the proposed zoning amendment
in terms of the criteria that Council should be reviewing as
part of the decision-making process.
Compatibility with Comprehensive Plan
The proposed zoning amendment and zoning map change appears to
be consistent with policies noted in the comprehensive plan.
Please review the previous agenda for more detail.
Geooranhv and Character of the Area
The proposal to include convenience stores and laundromats as
conditional uses in the 0-1 (neighborhood commercial) zone
appears to be consistent with the purpose of this zone, which
is to provide for commercial uses in a neighborhood setting.
Commercial uses, by their naturo, will result in some
conflicts with adjoining residential areas; therefore, it
makes sense to adopt this ordinance amendment which allows
neighborhood convenience store use to occur on a limited
"controlled" basis.
Demonstrated Need for Amendment
It could be argued that the need to amend the ordinance is
justified by the need to protect residential uses from
problems created by nearby convenience stores operating in the
8-1 zone.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to recommend approval of the request to include
convenience store and laundromat uses as conditional uses
In the 8-1 zone and adopt conditions as noted.
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
Under this alternative, Council is satisfied the
conditional use permit process for convenience stores and
laundromats in the B-1 zone can serve to protect the
character of adjoining residential areas and, therefore,
the ordinance amendment should be adopted.
ir.
. t-.:rn, Council elects to rezone the .;est Side
Market property to B-1, West Side Market would continue
to operate as a non -conforming use until such time that
a formal request for a conditional use permit is made.
Such a request must be made at such time that any
Intensification of use at the site is proposed.
Motion to recommend denial of the proposed ordinance
amendment.
Council could take the position that convenience stores
should be allowed to develop as permitted uses in the B-1
zone. A conditional use permit for such uses should not
be required if the B-1 zoning districts are properly
located relative to residential areas.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative $i. The amendment makes sense in
that the B-1 zoning district as a neighborhood commercial zone
ti is inherently prone to result in conflicts between business
and residential uses. The conditional use permit requirement
for convenience store and Laundromat uses as proposed serves
to provide the City with the ability to manage and control
conflicts between residential and convenience store/laundromat
uses.
As a final note, approval of this amendment does not
necessarily mean Council must approve the rezoning request
associated with the West Side Market. In other words, it may
make sense to adopt this amendment with or without the
associated rezoning of West Side Market.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proposed ordinance amendment; Excerpt from City
Council meeting minutes of 10/15/91; Copy of current B -i zone
district with purpose highlighted.
PROPOSED (.r4NGur4GE
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS THAT CHAPTER 11, SECTIONS
11-2 AND 11-4, OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE
REGULATION OF CONVENIENCE GROCERY STORES AND LAUNDROMATS AS CONDITIONAL
USES IN THE B-1 DISTRICT BE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
11-2: PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in a
B-1 district:
[A] Barber shops
[B] Beauty parlors
[C] Essential services
11-4: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in a B-1
district: (Requires a conditional use permit based upon
procedures set forth in and regulated by Chapter 22 of this
ordinance.)
[D] Convenience grocery stores provided that:
1. The site is adequately served by a collector street.
2. Access point to the site shall be limited to a
collector street.
( 3. Curb cuts or access points shall be at least one
hundred (100) feet from the intersection of two (2)
streets.
4. Conformity with the surrounding neighborhood is
maintained and required setbacks are mot.
5. Adequate screening and landscaping from neighborhood
residential districts is provided in accordance with
Chapter 3, Section 2, of this ordinance.
6. Traffic generated by the proposed use does not excood
the capacity of surrounding streets and intersections
to accommodate it.
7. The site shall conform to parking requirements as
provided in Chapter 3, Section 5, of this ordinance.
B. The provisions of Chaptor 22 of this ordinanco aro
considered and satisfactorily mot.
9. Building setback from residential uses must be 30 foot
or greater.
10. Parking lot setback from residential uses must be 15
t feet or greater.
11. The combined totalindividual gross floor area of
convenience store d%pr laundromat establishments
shall not exceed 3,00 sq ft in any single B-1
district.
Ordinance Amendment No.
Page 2
12. Hours of operation shall be limited to 5:00 a.m. to
11:00 P.M. I f - ? q) ;L00
13, &vl"I'L�Z �/.�.7� 1.1 c,�/%uii �.lLl� JU we [E)
)� 1
[E) Laundromat, self-service washing and drying provi ed that:
1. The site is adequately served by a collector street.
2. Access point to the site shall be limited to a
collector street.
3. Curb cuts or access points shall be at least one
hundred (100) feet from the intersection of two (2)
streets.
4. Conformity with the surrounding neighborhood is
maintained and required setbacks are met.
5. Adequate screening and landscaping from neighborhood
residential districts is provided in accordance with
Chapter 3, Section 2, of this ordinance.
6. Traffic generated by the proposed use does not exceed
the capacity of surrounding streets and intersections
to accommodate it.
7. The site shall conform to parking requirements as
provided in Chapter 3, Section 5, of this ordinance.
8. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are
considered and satisfactorily met.
9. Building setback from residential uses must be 30 feet
or greater.
10. Parking lot setback from residential uses must be 15
foot or greater.
11. The combined total or individual gross floor area of
convenience store and/or laundromat astablishments
shall not exceed 3,000 eq ft in any single B-1
district.
12. Hours of operation shall be limited to 5:00 a.m. to
11:00 P.M.
Adopted this 12th day of November, 1991.
Mayor
City Administrator
4
C'UQUAITL141�?GUp G1
-
CHAPTER 11
"B -I" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT
SECTION:
11-1: Purpose
11-2: Permitted Uses
11-3: Permitted Accessory Uses
11-4: Conditional Uses
11-1: PURPOSE.: The purpose of the B-1, neighborhood business,
district is to Provide fur the establishment of local centers
for convenient, limited office, retail, or Service outlets
which deal directly with the customer for whom the goods or
services ar-., furnished. Those centers are to provide services
and goods only for the surrounding neighborhoods and are not
Intended to draw customers from the entire community.
11-2: PERMITTED USES: The following arc permitted uses In a B-1
district:
JAI Barber shops
JBI Beauty parlors
IC) Essential services
op[D] Convenience grocery stores (not supermarket type)
[E) Laundromat, self-service washing and drying
PERMITTED ACCFSSOHY USES: •Phe following are permitted
accessory uses in a B-1 district:
JAJ Commor(:1ni or business buildings and structures for n
ilucnssury to the princtlin I use, but Such use sha I I
noL oxceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor space
of the principal use.
011-nLroot parking ns regulated by Chapter 3, Section 5,
of this ordinance but not Including semi -trailer trucks.
IC) off-street loading as regulated by Chapter 3, Section 6,
of this ordinance.
I I-4: CONDIT1014A1. 11.1;F.S: TIM fol lowing are conditionill uses in a 11-1
dislxlct.: (HO'lillf"19 a cundlLitinill use permit hnsod tiprin
procedure:: set forth in and regulated by Chnptor 22 of thin
ordinnitco. )
JAI GovornillenLal and publ le utility buildings and Structures
nocessary for the horilth, safety, and gonoral welfare of
the Community provided that:
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE IWO
l I . Conformity with Lhe surrounding neighborhood is
maintained and required seLbacks and side yard
requirements are met.
2. Equipment is cumplelely enclosed in a peimanenL
structure with no outside storage.
3. Adequate screening and landscaping from neighboring
residential dLstricts is provided In accordance
with Chapter 3, Section 2, of this ordinance.
4. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are
considered and satisfactorily met.
IN Professional and commercial (leased) offices provided
that:
1. The services which are provided are for the local
area rather than the community or region.
2. The traffic generated will not raise traffic
vulumes beyond Lhe capacity of the surrounding
area.
:1. The arch.itecluraI appearance of Lhe building
huusLng the office use shall reflect the building
:harncter of Lhe nrea and slin LI not be Flo
dis9iml Int' as Lo cause 1inpaIrmenL of 1)roper.1.y
values or UunsLILULe a blighting Influence within
Lho neighborhood.
4. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are
considered and satisfactorily mot.
(C) Cornmerclnl planned unit development as regulated by
Chapter 20 of this ordinance.
MONTICELL.O ZONING ORDINANCE
Council Minutes - 10/15/91
0®*0)
Consideration of a request to rezone Lot 1, Block 4, River
Terrace, also known as west Side Market, from R-1 Ssingle
family) zoninq designation to B-1 (neighborhood business).
Applicants, Tom Holthaus and Matt Holker.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that the
owners of the west Side Market request that the City rezone
the West Side Market from its present residential zoning
designation to the B-1 (neighborhood commercial) zoning
designation. The request for the rezoning stems from the
desire of the applicants to operate under a zoning designation
that is consistent with the business operation that is now in
place.
O'Neill went on to note that if the zoning ordinance amendment
is allowed, the West Side Market is no longer considered a
non -conforming use, which would allow the property ower to
fully utilize all the land area for commercial use as allowed
in the B-1 zone. This would allow the existing facility to be
enlarged significantly. In addition, the rezoning would allow
the West Side Market to sell Christmas trees at the site.
Under the present rules governing non -conforming uses,
Christmas tree sales are not technically allowed at the site,
as such outside sales could be construed as an enlargement or
intensification of a non -conforming use. In his presentation,
O'Neill informed Council that the Planning Commission
recommended that the rezoning be denied based on the finding
that the original zoning designation as R-1 was correct and
changing the designation to a B-1 district would constitute
spot zoning.
Ed Solberg, resident living at 1204 Sandy Lane, expressed
opposition to the rezoning request. He noted that the
rezoning constitutes spot zoning.
Tom Holthaus stated that his business must be able to compete
with other convenience stores, and in order to do so, he needs
to have the flexibility to use the site in a manner that
allows him to achieve the highest business potential at the
site. He also noted that the store has been a good neighbor,
as it has eliminated all beer sales and adult magazines. over
400 people use the convenience store per day.
Clint Herbst stated that the West Side Market owners knew what
they were getting into when they bought the property. They
knew that enlargement of the facility would not be allowed in
the R-1 district. They shouldn't be allowed to come back
later and request the rezoning.
Dan Blonigen disagreed with Herbst in stating that the
property has no potential for residential use, and the
property is being used as a neighborhood business center;
therefore, it should be zoned as such. S
VA
Council Minutes - 10115/91
Shirley Anderson noted that she is in the middle and agrees to
some degree with Dan. She noted that the original tavern that
was converted to the market was there prior to development of
residences.
Ken Maus stated that the local neighborhood deserves a first-
class convenience store; and in order to remain first class,
the store needs to be able to compete with other businesses
providing similar services. By allowing the rezoning to
occur, the business is in a better position to remain
competitive and more likely to remain an asset to the
neighborhood.
Jon Bogart, a member of the Planning Commission, was in
attendance. He suggested that the City somehow allow the
property to be rezoned to B-1 but require restrictive
covenants against the site which limit the enlargement of the
store.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill suggested that if Council is
striving to seek a compromise which would allow the West Side
Market to operate as a legal permitted use and at the same
time regulate or apply conditions associated with enlargement
of the site, then Council may wish to consider establishment
of a convenience store as a conditional use in the B-1 zone.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Clint Herbst to table consideration of rezoning
the West Side Market site from R-1 to B-1 and to direct City
staff to prepare an ordinance amendment allowing a convenience
store to operate in a B-1 district as a conditional use only.
Motion carried unanimously.
A motion was made by Dan Blonigon and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to allow Christmas tree sales to occur at the West
Side Market during the upcoming Christmas season. Motion
carried unanimously.
v
CHAPTER 11
"II -1" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT
SECTION:
11-1: Purpose
11-2: Permitted Uses
11-3: Permitted Accessory Uses
11-4: Conditional Uses
11-1:
PURPOSE: The purpose of the B-1, neighborhood business,
district. is t.o provide for the establishment of local centers
for convenlm:t, limited office, retail, or service outlets
which doal.directiy with the customer for whom the goods or
services a,:u furnished. These centers are to provide services
and yoods only for the surrounding neighborhoods and are not
intended Lo draw customers from the entire community.
11-2:
PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in a B-1
distrlcC:
[A) Barber shops 0
(
lJ
[B) Beauty parlors
(C) Essential services
[D) Convonl.ence grocery stores (not supermarket type)
(E) Laundromat, solf-aervice washing and drying
11-3:
PERM111VED ACCESSORY USES: Tho following are permitted
accessory uses In a B -I district:
[A] Co:mnercinl or business buildings and structures for a
use accoan ory to the principal use, but such use shall
not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor space
of the principal use.
IN Off-street pnrkiny as regulated by Chapter 3, Section 5,
of this orclinanco but not Including semi -trailer trucks.
[C[ Off-st.reat loading as regulated by Chapter 3, Section b,
of this orcllnanco.
11-4:
CUNDITIONAI, USES : The following aro conditional uses In a B-1
diatr.let: (Requires a conditional use permit based upon
procedures sot forth in and regulated by Chapter 22 of this
Cordinance.)
[A) Governmental and public utlllty buildings and structures
noconsary for the health, safety, and general welfare of
the communlLy provided that:
MONTICELLO
��
ZONING ORDINANCE L / illi
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
6. Consideration of a request to rezone Lot li Block 4. River
Terrace, also known as West Side Market, from R-1 fsingle
family residential) zoning designation to B-1 (neiqhborhood
business). Applicants, Tom Holthaus and Matt Holker. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City Council tabled consideration of this rezoning requeat
pending potential development of a conditional use permit
allowing convenience stores and laundromats to operate as
conditional uses in the B-1 zone.
If the ordinance amendment allowing convenience stores and
laundromats as a conditional use has been approved, the West
Side Market rezoning would result in the West Side Market
continuing to be a non -conforming use. This is because the
West Side Market does not have a conditional use permit
allowing it to operate. At such time that the property owners
wish to expand the West Side Market, then a conditional use
permit would need to be obtained. Potential changes to the
site plan that might include realignment of the access to
Highway 75 would be one of the requirements associated with
the conditional use permit that might be granted at some point
in the future.
If the ordinance amendment considered previous to this Item
was not approved, then approval of the rezoning request would
provide the property owner with full use of the property under
B-1 rules.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve rezoning of Lot 1, Block 4, River
Terrace, from R-1 (single family residential) zoning
designation to B-1 (neighborhood business).
Motion could be based on the finding that the proposed
p rezoning is consistent with the character and geography
of the area, and the rezoning will not tend to result in
d a depreciation of adjoining land values, and the need for
the rezoning has boon sufficiently demonutratod.
Under this alternative, City Council is convinced that
/ 1J convenience store and laundromat operation in the B-1
zone will not create a negative impact on adjoining
rosidontial property. Furthermore, it is appropriate to
\� rezone the alto as proposed because the position of the
l}, property relative to adjoining residential and school
uses JR Ruch that conflicts aro minimal. Finally, the
West Side Market operation by its nature is consistent
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
with the purpose of the B-1 zoning district and,
therefore, it makes sense to rezone the property to match
the convenience store operation.
p2. / Motion to deny said rezoning request.
A motion for denial could be based on the finding chat
/ the original zoning map was correct in establishing the
R -I zoning designation at this site. It should be the
intent of the City to deny the rezoning and thereby
encourage the West Side Market property to ultimately be
converted to residential uses in the long term. To allow
the site to be rezoned to B-1 would amount to "spot
`Q zoning." Finally, the geography and character of the
adjoining area is residential in nature, and thepresence
of the commercial activity and associated traffic at this
location will tend to depreciate adjoining residential
land values.
ij C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
"\\ Staff supports the rezoning based on reasons noted under
alternative il. It is the view of City staff that adding
convenience store and laundromat activity to the list of
conditional uses in the 8-1 zone helps to control and regulate
this type of business adjoining residential areas. Staff
recommendation is predicated on establishment of the ordinance
making convenience storo and laundromat activity conditional
uses.
As a final note, City staff recommendation is at odds with the
Planning Commission recommendation.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of letter in apposition to rezoning request.
s
November 21. 1991
Monticello City Council
Monticello. MN 55362
Re: Rezoning request for the West Side Market property
Dear Councilmember:
Because I am unable to attend the City Council meeting on Monday.
November 25, regarding the request made by Tom Holthaue and Matt
Holker to rezone the West Side Market property from R-1 to B-1. I
am writing this letter to inform you that I am very nnnoeed to
rezoning the West Side Market property. The property was
purchased by Mr. Holthaus and Mr. Holker with the krinwledge that
the property was zoned R-1. We continually see individuals buy
property and then try to rezone it in order to meet their
desires. Rezoning should be investigated before land is
purchased: and if It Is not possible to rezone the area, the
purchase should either not take place or be purchased for another
ude. Individual financial desires should have no bearing on
whether or not the property should be rezoned. Many land owners
would be adversely affected by rezoning this property. The only
individuals benefited by this rezoning would be Mr. Holthaus and
Mr. Holker.
I believe it is time for us to take a stand that our laws and
ordinances exist for a reason. Why must the ordinance be amended
to accommodate this buoineas? [low many times will Mr. liolthaus
and Mr. Holker keep coming back asking for more? What would atop
them from requesting an ordinance amendment in the future that
changes convenience storeo and laundromate back to a permitted
use rather than a conditional use in the B-1 zone ae now
proposed? There will be no control over this property if this
happens. The more we give, the more they seem to want. It never
seems to be enough.
Rezoning this property in snot zoning and Is against our
ordinance. If this lot ie rezoned. It will set a precedent that
will be difficult, if not impossible. to overturn. What will
happen if more individuals come forward and ask to rezone a
single lot? How can we say no later if we say yes now?
I support and appreciate the Planning Commission's efforte to
preserve our neighborhood. and I hope that you will sincerely
think about what our neighborhood means to ue. If we don't
preserve the residential areas we now have. there will soon be no
v
Monticello City Council
November 21, 1991
Page 2
residential areas available in which families will want to invest
in a home. Please vote to deny this rezoning request at Monday
evening'e meeting. Thank you.
Sincer ly,
Karen Doty
1225 Sandy Lane
Monticello, MN 55362
cc: Rick Wolfeteller. City Administrator
Jeff 0"Neill, Assistant Administrator ✓
9
City Council Agenda - 11/25/91
7. Consideration of a request to rezone the easterly 9.7 acres of
Auditors Subdivision, Lot 17, from B-3 Jhighwav business) to
a combination of PZM fperformance zone mixed) and B-2 (limited
business). Applicant, Evanqelical Covenant Church. (J. O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the October meeting of the Planning Commission, the
Evangelical Covenant Church, hereinafter referred to as the
church, requested that the City rezone a 9.7 -acre parcel of
land located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of
County Road 118 and Chelsea Road. The church requested that
the site be rezoned from B-3 (highway commercial) to PZM
(performance zone mixed). The Planning Commission held a
public hearing on the matter and made the recommendation that
the rezoning request be denied. The denial was based on the
finding that although the proposed site would be an excellent
location for a church, the need for the rezoning was not
demonstrated, as there are other areas nearby where a church
could be developed in accordance with the present zoning map.
In addition, the commercial uses displaced by the church use
could not be relocated without encroaching on residential
areas. This item never went before the City Council because
the church withdrew the request after Planning Commission
denial.
In response to the Planning Commission's decision, the church
withdrew the original request and has submitted a new,
modified rezoning request. The now proposal calls for
subdividing the 9.7 -acre parcel into two parcels, both of
which would remain under the ownership of the church.
Development of the church would occur on a 5 -acro parcel
located approximately 450 feet east of the original corner
site. The remaining parcel of land approximately 4.7 acres in
size would remain zoned for commercial use at the corner of
County Road 118 and Chelsea Road. Eventually, the B-3 land
west of the church site would then be rezoned to business
campus use. The business campus rezoning would occur in the
future as part of the mass rezoning that is planned to occur
in conjunction with the Chelsea corridor planning study.
Please see the attached proposed zoning map for more details
regarding the proposed zoning configuration.
The church has indicated the other sites have boon examined,
and some are desirable; however, the land cost at those sites
is excessive. The proposed site is the best site within their
budget.
In response to the now compromise proposal submitted by the
church, the Planning Commission again recommended denial based
on the finding that:
City Council Agenda - 11/25/91
1. Commercial uses displaced by the church cannot be
relocated nearby without encroachment on
residential areas.
2. Development of a church imbedded between commercial
and industrial uses is not desirable.
3. The best use for the property is for commercial use
because of proximity to the freeway and due to its
separation from residential uses.
4. The B-3 property remaining at the corner (4.7
acres) after the rezoning is insufficient to
satisfy long-term demand for commercial land in the
area.
5. The need for rezoning has not been sufficiently
demonstrated, as other land is available for this
type of use.
Impact of Proposal
I. Reduction in size of commercial service area.
(� The church proposal will result in splitting a 16.7 -acre
commercial area into a 4.7 -acro area for commercial use,
5 acres for church use, and the remaining 6.7 acres
converted to business campus uses.
The City Planner has indicated that the original area
designated for commercial use in the Chelsea corridor
planning study (16.7 acres) is proper given the size of
the residential and industrial areas that will be served
by this commercial district.
The proposal will result in the need to extend the
business campus zoning district eastward to cover the
6.7 -acro parcel west of the church. It is proposed that
the area west of the church be rezoned to business campus
use because the ability to develop it for commercial use
will bo limited due to the proposed position of the
church. It just does not make sense to have a commercial
area split by the church.
in summary, although this proposal maintains a 4.7 -acro
parcel at the prime commercial location, the total
commercial area is reduced by more than two-thirds.
According to the planner, this reduction is not proper
given the potential need for commercial property in the
area.
E
City Council Agenda - 11/25191
2. Church site zoned PZM.
The proposal to rezone the church site to PZM prior to
the actual church development opens the door slightly for
unwanted development of residential uses. This is
because under the PZM zoning district designation, multi-
family residential development is allowed as a
conditional use. This potentiality can be eliminated
when the concept plan for the area is adopted by making
sure that the concept plan notes a church or
"institutional" use at this PZM site. This would provide
the authority that the City would need to deny
residential development at the site.
H. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to recommend that the City Council adopt the
proposed zoning map amendment based on the finding that
the amendments are consistent with the comprehensive plan
and compatible with the adjoining land uses.
Under this alternative, the Council is satisfied that the
4.7 -acre parcel of land on the corner is sufficient to
serve the long-term need for commercial land in the area
or there are other areas available to satisfy commercial
land demand, most notably, the PZM district in the area
of the intersection of CSAR 75 and 117; therefore, the
commercial area displaced by the church and industrial
land use is not determined to be a problem. In addition,
the Council could view the church use as being compatible
with adjoining school, commercial, and industrial uses.
According to the planner, there will be a demand for
commercial land in the area that will not be satisfied
with the remaining 4.67 acres of commorcial land.
Please note that the problem that the church is having in
finding affordable land that is properly zoned, although
unfortunate, should not be a factor in decision making.
2. Motion to recommend denial of proposed rezoning request
based on the finding that:
1. Commercial uses displaced by the church cannot be
relocated without encroachment on residential
areas.
2. Development of a church imbedded between commercial
and industrial uses is not desirable.
11
City Council Agenda - 11/25/91
3. The best use for the property is for commercial use
because of proximity to the freeway and due to its
separation from residential uses.
4. The B-3 property remaining at the corner (4.7
acres) after the rezoning is insufficient to
satisfy long-term demand for commercial land in the
area.
5. The need for rezoning has not been sufficiently
demonstrated, as other land is available for this
type of use.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council select alternative #2 for the
reasons noted in the Planning Commission finding.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Map showing proposed rezoning; Application materials;
Preliminary Chelsea Corridor Concept Plan prepared by planner;
Staff report to Planning Commission on original rezoning
request reviewed by Planning Commission in October.
12
...�
�/ Consideration of a request to rezone the easterly 9.7 acres
of Auditors Subdivision, Wt t?, from a-3 {highway business}
•:% //, �// ^ �. zoning dint rict to a combination of PZM (performance zone mixed)
'i, • 1^. /
and IS (limited business) zoning districts. Specifically, the
9.7-acro rezone area to be rezoned as follows: The easterly
•�,_,,, `^� �.t��i,t ' 4.7 acres of the 9.7-acro rezone area to be rezoned to the B-2
t /4 zoning district, and the remaining westerly 5-acre portion of the
9.7-acro rezone area to be rezoned to the PZM district. The
-i�F,. ���:. ^• j.!L/I proposed rezoning would allow development of a church facility
in the PZM zone.
%/ ^+��j �`•��r� APPLICANT: Evangelical Covenant Church
.14 �•� ..'tiros it ('+ ''+' , `�, r t-+�`-
J4 i
12
•:' py• PZM �.
Chu, IlL B-2
v7 L 'A 12
AO AC
)
k-J�
4j
�.STA _E
'f Y3o
rt6zLOUti`�. yZ.
fit"- p,ar ��-�...yt?r� . ,� .•7 t�����
to '�-.�, y,1
Ga,�" tom" �•'j,•
1 ^e`bV
o5ed' Z
e,Wr e
J
�tUge
Lv�
(U ON J
RD
Quo
us
e opm C EPT PLAN (Pe
THIS PLAN WILL BE CONSIDERED
j eighbor FOR FORMAL APPROVAL IN
JANUARY. THIS PLAN IS
. mercia SUPPORTED BY THE PLANNING
nter COMMISSION.
\ S ho ist
J 8
0
I 'tri .pos ig , 1001 °
O
n
I l a
It
-fir 7!�!� � ± • 1i / :.1.
IN
c:
•.�.II c
�L• i oJl� 7 ��i= Tt .���WIT
WIT .',,•• �.
C
PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION
City of Monticello
TYPE OF HEARING:
CONDITIONAL USE - fee $125.00 + expenses
REZONING - fee $250.00 + all necessary consulting expenses(Resubmissic
()VAR-ANCE - fee $50.00 for setbacks or $125.00 for others + expenses
(] 0TH =R - fee $
Applicant(s): The Northwest Conference of the Evaneelical Covenant Church
Applicant(s) Address: 4721 East 31st Streec.Mols.MN 55406
Applicant(s) Phone(s): Home: Haglund 682 6469 Office: 721 4893
Address Of Property: I 94, Chelsea Rd and Co.Rd.118 Monticello
Legal Description of Property -
Lo t:
roperty:Lot: , Block: ; Subdivision:
Other: See attachment East 9.7 Acres pf Parcel A- 8ovle orooerry
(] See Attached
Currently Zoned: s 3 Hiahwav Business Proposed Zoning:_gast 4.7 Acres to 8-2
Names of Property Owners within 350 feet: (I See Att
4lz5.0 Acres to PZM
Tr hurch use.
Monticello Public SSb2ol
PAra Credit of St. Pel
Others Unknown
Please explain the reason for the public hearing request
ne.sihility of than aine the 4.7 ar.e.t..,,._ ¢,c V. __ ,
Size of Plat to be Subdivided: 9.7 to build church acres
Name of Firm Preparing Subdivision Plat: nand+ng onip,_ap .1
Date:O�p„r 17 1-001 Signed: ��^� „(Q ,t
.(:..:........::......................... r�aaLe�':.s..Qr. J�48i1+�A,.: JW.44.GQ tSu►ii4r.1.:W.e ;+
(For city use only)
Date Application Received: Roceipt Number:
Date of Public Hearing at Planning Commission: Time:
DOCision of Planning Commission:
(I See Attached
If a variance, was there an appeal? yes (I No; If so, attached a copy
of the appeal.
Date of Council Consideration:
Decision of Council:
Comments:
Data of Publication:
Date of Mailing:
Time:
(I See Attached
(I See Attached
(attach copy of public hearing notice
(attached copy of a:fidavit o! mai_in;�
POR CHURCH
USE
FOR NEIGHBORHOOD
i COMMERCIAL USE
f-
0
rl
0 ISO
coo low
.L4[ 11 IQI
--Dort' DOVHLOPMeliT
MOMII ILIO. YIYMI101.
uIu
111.YA.1 tool
I.BASIS FOR REQUESTING ACTION TO REZONE SITE FOR CHURCH USE(5.OAcres)
ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS:
For the church - From our experience, we find that we often do the
local church a disfavor by finding land for church use where the costs
for a "buildable" site are unknown. This is the only site that meets
our acreage needs where these costs are known.
For the city - If we are forced to purchase a site where all the
needed city improvements are not available, we will, within a few
years, ask the city to extend these improvements. This will force
the city to extend these services and expend the related costs
prematurely.
LOCATION:
We selected this location for several reasons:
I. Close proximity to the city proper - A church needs to be close
to the "established city" to identify with the entire city. Any
church who begins it's ministry located in the outskirts of the
city or in a neighboring rural area, will find identity with the
"established city" to be very difficult.
2. Traffic patterns - We like to be near the freeway, the north -
south County Road 118 and especially Chelsea Road which will
provide a very positive traffic flow from Highway 25.
3. The Middle School - We find that being near to a public school
provides a very positive image for a church.
4. Being near to commercial or neighborhood business - Being near
to business establiahmnnta, especially office or service facilities,
L) is a positive consideration for our church.
SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY :
We feel that the Monticello Covenant Church is a growing church
because of it's positive relationship to the community. We cannot
state for sure, but possible services from this site might be:
- EWOR - This stands for Evening With Out Kids
- Preschool programs
- Daycare facilities
- Various children's clubs and youth activities
- Senior citizen services
These activities could beat be done from this site.
AESTHETICS:
As we see churches formed, sites selected and first facilities built,
we see that the churches image, personality and facility presentation
often has an effect, either positively or negatively, upon the
community. This is best expressed in serviceabilicy,location and
visability of the facility. Our view is that this sites serviceability
and location are excellent and it's use for building a church is
compatible with it's neighbors. Beyond that however, we are most
impressed with the potential for excellent visibility for those who
travel Interstate 94 from the east and for those who will, in the
future, live in the valley to the south. In Matthew, there is a Bible
verse that says,"s city set on a hill cannot be hid". The same applies
C to a church.
II. BASF FOR REQUESTING ACTION TO REZONE SITE FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMM.(4.7A-RE
We are.. will ing'to'have the church on, the 5.0 acres described above and we
are requesting that this corner piace be.resoned to 5-2.Neighborhool
Commercial. We would hold the property until a buyer could be found to
utilise the property for 8-2 purposes. .�
Li strial/
Bu 1 us
Deveiopm --- e,
,I eighbor °°aw
mercia �r
n t er
ksll>i '
I A , j if•a IO[T\ [�
^ond• LI interstate 94
Recre I re
S ho - ist " �, ' r o� [ •' c h
_ / p Fm a
66 ool yj a-
1'r D[ .ed i 1
°a
A, inV
1 lilt. 3 k ry/I
iE E in IT ami
-J
0
Planning Commission Agenda - 10/l/'94
Public Hearinq--Consideration of a request to rezone a 9 -acre
portion of Auditor's Subdivision, Lot 17, from B-3 (highway
business) zoning designation to PZM (performance zone mixed),
which would allow development of a church. Applicant,
Evangelical Covenant Church. (J.O.)
A- REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you recall at the August meeting of the Planning
Commission, James D. Haglund, Assistant to the Superintendent
of the Northwest Conference of the Evangelical Covenant
Church, was present to introduce himself and inform the
Planning Commission that the Evangelical Covenant Church is
actively seeking a site for development of a new church in the
city of Monticello. The Covenant Church has found a site that
they feel is excellent for their church facility; however, the
site is currently zoned B-3 (highway business), which does not
Include church use among permitted uses listed. Therefore, a
zoning ordinance is required which would rezone this property
to a district that does allow church development as a
permitted or conditional use.
city staff recommends that if the zoning district designation
is changed to allow a church facility to operate that it be
changed to the PZM zoning district, as this district allows
church use as a conditional use and also allows development of
retail businesses. In essence, the PZM zone is the zoning
district designation most similar to the B-3 zone while still
allowing church development.
The area proposed for rezoning is located at the northwest
quadrant of the intersection of Chelsea Road and County
Road 18. The freeway forms the northern border of the area.
As noted earlier, this property is currently zoned for highway
commercial use, as it was originally anticipated that at some
point in the future an interchange might be developed at this
site, which would result in this property being used heavily
for highway business uses. The update to the zoning map,
which is being scheduled for public hearing later in October
of this year and has been reviewed by the Planning Commission,
continues to show this area as a commercial area; however, the
future zoning may change from the highway commercial
designation to a designation that continuos to Include
commercial activity. The nature of the commercial activity
will likely be less intense than the current B-3 highway
zoning designation duo to the fact that the nature of the
business activity at this corner will likely be dependent on
development of the residential area nearby rather than being
dependent on freeway traffic related commerce.
CD
Planning Commission Agenda - 10/1/91
To the north of the site is the freeway. To the west of the
site under our current zoning map lies B-3 property, which,
according to our study underway, will be converted to the I-1
business campus zone. To the south of the site is property
owned by the school district, which is currently zoned B-3;
however, under the new plan, the school property will be
rezoned to R-1, which would allow development of school
related athletic fields. To the east of the property is
County Road 118, and east of 118 is a low area that is zoned
for a residential planned unit development. The portion of
the planned unit development area directly east of the site
will likely be used for storm water drainage retention pond
area.
Following is a review of the site in terms of the requirements
associated with zoning ordinance amendments.
Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan
on page 51 of the comprehensive plan, it is noted under
item S6 that "churches should have ample site for building,
landscaping, expansion, and off-street parking. Parking
should be provided on the maximum design capacity. Churches
should be located adjacent to a thoroughfare or collector
street and have easy access to the area served. They should
not be located on a minor residential street and in the midst
of residential neighborhoods." The amendment to the zoning
map as proposed appears to be consistent with this section of
the comprehensive plan. On the other hand, another section of
the comprehensive plan under commercial policies states that
the -location of new shopping areas should be justified by an
adequate market study and consideration for the neiahborhood,
land use, and circulation pattern."
In reviewing the general area that is available for limited or
neighborhood type commercial activity addressing the needs of
this burgeoning residential area, it appears that the proposed
location for the church facility is located in the prime
position for commercial development. If the church developed
a facility at this location, the displaced commercial activity
would need to be moved to another location either further west
encroaching in prime industrial land or to a position east of
County Road 18, which would cause encroachment into areas
earmarked for residential development. In other words,
although development of a church facility by itself at this
location given the adjoining land uses may make sense, the
resulting displacement of the commercial activity to a much
less desirable area does not make sense. Therefore, the
proposed zoning amendment may not be consistent with the
policies outlined in the comprehensive plan of the City.
Planning Commission Agenda - 10/1/91
The Geographical Area and Character of the Surroundinq Area
Development of a church facility at this location will not
create a negative impact on residential properties and can be
properly screened from the business campus zone so as to
mitigate any potential conflicts that might develop. In
addition, the school uses to the south appear to be completely
consistent and compatible with the church use. The proposal
appears to be consistent with this zoning ordinance amendment
criteria.
Demonstrated Need for Such Use
As noted earlier, the proposed location for the church
facility appears to be the only feasible location for
commercial activity serving the growing residential area. The
site is perfect for the convenience store type businesses and
other commercial activity that serves the needs of the local
industrial and residential markets. Furthermore, the location
at the intersection of two mayor roads further enhances it as
a commercial site.
In reviewing the land available for development of a church
facility near the proposed rezoning site, there appear to be
other suitable locations along the perimeter of proposed
residential areas; therefore, there does not appear to be an
overriding need to rezone the property as proposed in order to
provide land necessary for church development. There are
other options available.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the request to rezone the said property
from the B-3 to the PZM zoning district.
Under this alternative, Planning Commission could make
the finding that the proposed amendment is consistent
with the comprehensive plan in terms of development of
church facilities as noted in item 16 of the community
facilities policy, and Planning Commission could include
in its finding the statement that tho development of a
church at this site is consistent with the character and
geography of the area, as a church developed at this
location will not be likely to croato a negative impact
on adjoining industrial, school, and residential uses.
2. Motion to deny the rezoning request as proposed based on
the finding that the development of a church facility and
associated rezoning at this location, though consistent
with portions of the comprehensive plan and consistent
with the geography and character of the area, will result
(2)
Planning Commission Agenda - 10/1/91
in the displacement of a commercial zone to another less
desirable area. Furthermore, development of a church at
this location does not represent the highest and best use
of this land.
Planning Commission could also include in its finding
that other alternative sites for development of a church
facility in the area are available, and, therefore, the
need for the rezoning has not been sufficiently
demonstrated.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative Y2 based on the findings
suggested.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Area identification map; Rezoning application; Concept plan
for area development prepared by Northwest Associated
Consultants; Copy of proposed ordinance amendment.
CU
t
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
s. Consideration of replacement of power band saw for the public
works shop. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The metal cutting band saw or power hack saw at the public
works shop is a small 4" x b", non -precision, home handyman
type of saw. We would like to replace the unit with a larger
7" x 12" horizontal/vertical commercial type of saw capable of
consistent accurate cuts. Such a saw would be a time saver in
not having to cut the same piece of metal two or three times
or doing extensive grinding to straighten out a crooked cut.
In addition, it would give us much greater flexibility having
a larger capacity.
In preparation for this, we placed an amount of $1,700 In the
1991 budget based upon quotes we had obtained in the summer of
1990. It was assumed that our old saw would be sold at public
auction (when we have it) and bring $75 or maybe $100. New
saws of this small home handyman type sell for $199.
Upon obtaining quotes, in 1991 we learned that there were
price increases in the saw that we had proposed. We were
proposing a 7 x 12 horizontal cutoff band saw made by the
Wilton Company manufactured in the United States. This is a
commercial unit which features hydraulic feed system,
consistent accurate cuts, and a blade or cooling system. Such
a saw as the Model 3575 Wilton should meet the City's
requirements for years and years. The other high-quality
tools that we have purchased such as our Miller welders, Smith
torch set, and Baldor grinder will probably last 20 years.
We have also looked into the Ellis brand of saw. This air-
cooled saw would require less shop room, as the saw head
swivels similar to a miter saw. The other style saws (Wilton
or Jet) require moving the saw or stock to cut a 45 degree
angle.
The Model 1500 Ellis saw 80110 for $2,295 from Gladwin
Machinery and Supply Company of Minneapolis. This would be
$995 over budget.
The best price we have on the Model 3575 Wilton is from the
Mars Company in Minneapolis for $2,221. Assuming we can sell
our old saw at public auction for possibly $100, this would
give us a cost of $2,146, which is about $450 over budget.
13
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1.
The first alternative would be to authorize the purchase
of the Welton Model 3575 from the Mars Company in
Minneapolis for $2,221.
2.
The second alternative would be to look at a cheaper line
of saw such as the Jet brand. We would be able to save
approximately $275 by purchasing that brand of saw.
Roger did check with a used equipment dealer in
Minneapolis, however, regarding the Jet saw and the
Wilton saw. This individual handles used saws only and,
although he did not have any at the time, recommended
that we stay away from purchasing a Jet machine and that
the Wilton was a good -quality saw.
3.
The third alternative would be to purchase the Model 1500
Ellis saw from Gladwin for $2,295.
4.
The fourth alternative would be continue as we are
utilizing the small saw. This does not appear to be
practical, however. A recent project Installing railing
in East Bridge Park for the stairways demonstrated
clearly that we need a better saw. A significant amount
of time could have been saved on this project had we had
the higher -quality saw.
C.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Diroctor and
Street Superintendent that the City Council authorize the
purchase of the Wilton saw from the Mars Company in the amount
of $2,221 as outlined in alternative M1 or Ellis saw from
Gladwin Machinery and Supply Company for $2,295 as outlined in
alternative A3. Evon though the budgeted amount of this item
was only $1,700, there are adequate funds available in other
sections of the public works budget that were not spent such
as $35,000 left from the purchase of a large sidewalk snow
blower.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of saw quotes.
14
110V =0 '91 10: I3 FP.O:1 WP PS IIARS TO 1024-11235.1-104 Pai;E.0Uci00-1
0W.P. & R.S. MARS COMPANY
INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES
November 7.0, 1991
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Attn: Roger Mack
Dear Mr. Mack:
Thank you very much for your inquiry with regard to the Wilton
bandsaw machines we represent. Below is the pricing you requested:
1 ea #3535 7" x 12" Wilton horizontal bandsaw machine
(FOB Chicago)
S 2275.00
Far and away Wilton's most popular machine in that size and
price range is the American made saw model #3575. You can son by
the attached literature that it to heavier, hoe several more
features and to more versatile. We buy it right, too:
1 ea #5575 7" x 12" Wilton horizontal bandeaw machine
(FOB Mare -Bloomington)
S 2221.00
Please call if we can be of any further help.
Thank you, air:
Sincerely,
Robert S. Mara, 11I
President
0LOON MnaN WAUTW V
3161: 70n 61M6 sbw..lpm, 6a 66420 4410 arW Avm^ awn. MN Mot
612.006.0000 • Pa. 612•xt,320 P1�020d707 •x44 r100S 3W
116111 !q: !LI _rrr}II 1.11 r'i PlirFf. TV IOZJ-ticQ5a4QJ Pr+GF..QQ!.00•1 711 x 12' HORIZONTAL CUT=OFF BAN® SAW
,1%
r�
ENGINEERED FOR CONSISTENT PERFORMANCE
The Wilton — a 12" horizotilal imna — is huilt to deliver fa.t, accurate cuttma on all tvuPs of material. Heavy duty, rigid steel construction
of the head and base provides full Made xntf art and rlimina:rs .,brauun and deflection. the combination of a hmnre worm gear reduction
po.er train, along with pre.6sion blade guides and a hvAraulic feed system delivers. co-Weni accurate cuts and longer blade life. Designed
with the operator m mind• the taw c(m—gandard with rapid acting vise fallowing miter cuts to 43-1, aconveniently located control panel, and
an r. asily accesslbic ma l,w system.
IAMB fi
18 OaS.aA_.
Easy Illide Tensioning &
Tracking
Manual precision blade tensionm. Uno
slmpl► adWumem to uppm whoel hu
easy blada Tai kumil
Iluk
cull Ulade Suplrorl
UWrr hlade guide Is ccrured to a ngid,
ad;uslahlo pr rclsion slide. mai ntaining full
binds supportwhedier fully essondssdof
cehm iryf.
Precision Blade Culdes
I hi ee bnaring precision blade guides pro•
vido full roller suppon and ensure prul,,!r
blade allgnmunt. EACH assembly can.
bin- too cam follower tide bearcngr 4tN
haruened race and creaw filling'. X[141
ball Irartng re.a guide, rhe oumilk c"a
lol lowor hearing is mounted on an whi
U7v =0 'S1 IU: I! FP01'I WF Pi I-I6=1f3 TO 1024-312354-10.1 Fil1ic.00-3/00.1
Chip Removal System
Adluu a ole faire brush re:nrts es chips from
blade. Rubber s.iprr s"ul:. m remkn•ing
ehipl bel— entering blade cwde.
Coolant Syal'rn
•1 rill-, rt nr sshh A wl"mblo.
All, undKled cenlnhrgal pump Easy
acres nom hart rA ntachhr
Gear Drive Power Train
the Rear boy utilizes a hardened steel
worm shah supported at each end with
lapmtd rolls bearings driving a precision
browe warm gear in an od bath. Dells ens
consistent speed to the blade resulting in
lunger blade life.
Control Panel
C_dtrs:nies all boated for caw accessiodiry.
Workstop
Workstop allows for repesltive,
accurate cuts.
Adjustable Hydraulic Feed
System
Equipped With a vanabM rate hydraulic feed
syeem which is Tiled y an adius:able
cus." tytancirig spring. This feed sevens
deliversavrotihconlsi•zent Fere rate rewlting
in Io%er blade Ide arsrl acttuW-,
Rapid Acting Vise
Rapid acting vise with conventional light.
emir%. Wilton designed vise mcmprates
heavy duty buttress threads IM tasrei action
andgreaterclamp'ngpmswm. Slanonil
laws secureu with three bolts •sen when
mitre cutting at 45'.
SPECIFICATIONS
___ORDERING INFORMATION
--_--+—__--__
Culling C.P.01r:
7. 9,.und
C4tebg— DC
I Pi. wide . 7' high Rectangle
Number Number Description
t !• —de . 7' h6gh F bat ria l
7'
Wet Cutting Model$ include complete co. Ionl tystem
Bbd, Sire:
'•"wide . Migh a1 4S'
'/ ' . U17 . 101'
3575 17275 r ■ 12' Wet Metal•Gminr f_ovWnrllon
Blad, speeds:
r,0•I 10.1 SS•20S SFVM
Bard Saw with 3J4 NP,lplrau,'7ISl:JOV
Mile Culd,s:
Sill.- Fceentrie Shefi, ball bearings.
motor, 500 IM. with hydraulic fr d
Re.r Bell gearing
3360 77295 Same as 3s7S eluept wuh low voltage
BbrM Wh,els:
11'J.: Diam4ler, Cast from
proteafrm and magnetic switch.
Blade Ml-
Worm C:car Reduction
•9andaN machine connected I t SV unless otherwne wecin d
Gem Bn.
mil
7• IIP, capacitor Ita't, 1713 MIM,
,,1120v
-gl.phn
1'Iei
kin -d acting, fdhlb WOKw.Kw.a. w
REPLACEMENT BLADES
■� rte D6nenJam:
uslnening vise
t 511'. W lU'
Gulnsg UC
H ani •Cui• ff position
Number No dim Destdolon
Cadged rump:
csdu_mt)lr In 1 gallon 134.
504421 38921 8 teeth pert lwh•'/:..OJZ . 101• Made
Wet swung rnod4b eanplee wah
904364 18016 10140th p0• inch,Y0 • 012. 101' blade
t. .. , I .—he nozzle, thul-0
504424 18076 14 1641h Vol inch.'/: . OJ) . I01' Wilde
vah•and link balfle
S0S640' 18440 a/bVari.fpoln.Bl•navtal'ii I.UJ7x101'1112dF
' Supplied as standard on band saw.
WIT
O
• Hood movos loft or ilght for anglo cutting • Built-in pfoirnclor for Inst and nccurato soloction of anglos
• Stock romains In ono position for nil cuts 0 Ono stop convorsion hom horizontal to vortical saw �"
MOBILE MITRE BAND SAWS
SPECIFICATIONS
MODEL 1100
MODEL 1200
MODEL 150D
Capacity ...............
8 V4" round at 90'
8-y." round at 90'
10" round at 90"
10" Ilat at 90
10" flat at 90"
11" flat at 90'
6'l," round al 45"
6'b" round at 45"
61In' round at 45"
64.x" liat at 45
6'/," flat at 45"
7 V." [let et 45"
Made speeds ........
. 70-135-250 FPM
70-135-250 FPM
70-135-250FPM
dlado size . . .
8'0"x'/," x 025
Witt" MY."x 032
9'6"w y." x.032
Head pressure..... ....
Hydraulic cylinder
Hydraulic cylinder
Hydraulic cylinder
Viso ..... . .. ......
Ouick adjusting
Quick adjusting -- Deluxe
Quick adju:0ng Deluxe
Shut off ... ..........
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic
Motor ... . . ......
I/, H.P 1 10 Voll60 Cycle
V. H.P. 110 Voll 60 Cycle
'V. H.P. 1 1 OVolt 60 Cycle
Single phase
Single phase
Single phase
Portable .............
. 10" wheels- standard
10" wheels - standard
10' wheels- standard
Shipping weight .......
. 370 lbs
385 tbs.
435 tbs.
Size . ................
Table Height -- 26'/,'
Table Height -- 261/,'
Table He hl — 277.'
Length - .50"
Length - 52"
Length 5V
Width -23"
Width -23'
Width 24V
Haight - 44"
Haight - 44"
Height — 451/2"
Sealed oil bath
worm gear ..
Standard
Standard
Standard
Removable chip tray .
Standard
Standard
Standard
Construction
Heavy steol, welded and
Heavy stool, welded and
Heavy steal, welded
machined let accuracy
machined for accuracy
machined lot accuracy
and duiabddy, 14 sealed
and durability, 14 scaled
and dorabihty. 14 soated
SS.- -.�
precision ball bearings
precison ball bearings
precision ball bearings.
Jjljr�wl� ,.�.-r. -..
•-�Plw�nat--2'gJt SpeTo^+-- �1 ! ��A�'s1�- 'eM�►—�-9�-�y�-
I V x 16" Vertical table
with blade guard .. ...
Optional
Optional
Optional
Stock stand with micro
adjustable gauge ....
. Optional
Optional
Optional
Single stand - - Tt 1prod .
Optional
Optional
Optional
SOLD Bit
WARRANTY.
All pane and workmanship,
with the exception of blade@ on
ELLIS MITRE BAND SAWS, ate
warranted low a per lod of one year
from purchase date Any partorworkmuehip
found tobei�tac0ve
and covered under thio Vllananty should ber returned to E019 mto
Company. Inc, postpaid.
�
�I,.,_�r,_�is
1
y 0.. 1+JI I` 1 1.L.--.
,M I. 416.U -.LL I.
HORIZOWAL/VEFMCAL BANDSAW
JET HVBS-712 HORIZONTALNERTICAL BANDSAW
5pECIFICrATIONs:
■ Cuts round, st uara, rectangle- tubes or prolfas; fanous or noreerrous
A!ANflmn@G
mela!s
NNan n a adty
• Top trams mounted cantrd panel for easy operaWn
Hoorl;
■ Dove:ait arm and slide provides optimum blade stadtiry
—Ma
• Neastonminedbed
]hf4atP!'41h:
Worm gear speed reducers sped* designed and ground
fgre:
O Sturdy base with Coolant sump
D t7ux,•k ad{ust type v+se
pyeey
Ifrillf
a ZR:
STANDARD EDuipmEtJT
i t tar.
0 Motor with controls and auto stha•arf
22 Ift:•
• Coolant system. 3 -gallon capacity
mer.
■ Saw blade
- ■ Vertical cutting table
H{p.Igtp;
■ Adplstable matenal stop
y 4p1:
Tool boat wilh toots
griF9ntal:
■ 0 'b" rrlanual
MM.
L,gnf¢t%
qp-rosli
bpvarlbcarad
R•Id
p,W,9AM4.d Sed
it/ 14�111-I
HARRIS MACHINERY CO. t.
501 30th Avenue S.E. Irss7u
Itl11mIM,Y 1
MintfeepD'is. MN 55414
Tel. 612.331.1829
m4r-#I) q
W61Q18ntildsJlAIi it. hlml.11o
Hves•»2
ii,UM
•_ 7'et2-try
i t•3ttfi'tt�!$�'
4!1.
t07-Irrx3/4'
I .
10-102'
-u E'
,.7 t .
el�t
'1r' n'ug f?�at StUp
aye t
+=95 @s
70t 47
/ 1-
1^5
ail •jr��.:i�?'�� .'��':+"J tii,,,_ ' �:_ � �Wi�
M•ramr:+ba tAY. JG7oa+7fi'"af. itltto+S,adt�irgy/tygty+5' iiYi+?.ry:Srt
rv:,t:s
_mif
�.
tttsndm�
I
data C`i:Y71 _ _ ::
►,.y6
H4RQOWAL/VEFMCAL BANDSAW
y' _
WfIVM HORIZONTALNERTICAL BANDSAW
SQEC, CATIONS:
I1LS_IDL
! rs ed motor
414457
mppaata moble con b:nason bandsaw
C Y
)a Cf CB used nortiorral:y of vertica;Yn4:
T
i Htcrau!.0 dcmaf vb
■ Heary Cast iron bell
hroal ,pplh'
7•xi'l,•
(•
■ Fuad approach sw,vet:rg angle wse
Ynri ca
�•
■ Re.erea Enew,lhb-Al-inch•otray
Yi. a
q
■ Auortaac shut4!1 a!Iar =I
lade gzg:
b'a•x-Q9?,�vy
■ Hardened arra Around worm gears
rme:
A5, t:jg ifiO
■ Adtntab!e ro=ar blade guides
64-1.,J
tMglnr a t ktM:
3'4 HF. i
STANDARDEOUIFMEUT
Fr�xn ti
■ Noir with controls and alto shut-off
■ Co�r.Wel9 Coctant system
furor Soave Pegv`rerr.
WQA_n1L[orp�*px.t
aa-trt��3• n'
■ Venralsaw table
gq
ht+png_Wefohtfeporox.l•
X71 is.
3521hs.
n
■ &ade guards
p
■ Cbp brush
■ Ai lab!e MaWat slot?
■ tSlace
Q
■ CpHa cls macva
M
_X
z
G)
/ 1-
1^5
ail •jr��.:i�?'�� .'��':+"J tii,,,_ ' �:_ � �Wi�
M•ramr:+ba tAY. JG7oa+7fi'"af. itltto+S,adt�irgy/tygty+5' iiYi+?.ry:Srt
rv:,t:s
_mif
�.
tttsndm�
I
data C`i:Y71 _ _ ::
►,.y6
`
ttAaR h I'AACHINFky UU
4
�•
901 30th Avenue S.E.
•
A�
WrineaD'3tm MN 55414
RAI "A
tel 612.331.1829
64-1.,J
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
9. Consideration of purchase of automatic control for water
system using old tower. {J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
When the new control system was built for the water system, it
incorporated the ability to monitor pressure or tower levels
at two different locations. One would be the new water tank
on top of Monte Club hill, another would either be a downtown
pressure zone or the old tower level.
Now that the City has decided to keep the old tower and use it
during emergency periods or for periods when the new tank is
taken down for maintenance and repairs, we would like to have
a level -sending unit installed at the old tower site downtown
so that we may use all of the automatic functions of our new
system with the old tower. Currently when the new tower is
off line and the old tower is being used, wells 1 and 2 are
operated off the original 60's -style mercury switches, which
are not entirely accurate and occasionally cause overflow and
problems in regulating the system in the old tower. In
addition, all of the remaining portions of our new water
system are then on manual operation, that is, wells 3 and 4
f.
and booster pumps I through 4 at the reservoir.
In the 1992 budget, we placed an amount of $4,500 for
necessary improvements to our system for automatic control of
the old tower. We have a quote from Automatic Systems for the
telemetrics control at $3,592. It is estimated that a few
hundred dollars in additional work by our local electrician
would be needed. The entire project should not exceed the
budgeted amount.
An amount of $9,000 was placed in the 1990 budget for software
and backup improvements to our water system. Those amounts
were not expanded; therefore, It would be possible to use this
amount., which is now surplus In the capital outlay fund, and
reduce the 1992 budget by an amount of $4,500.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to authorize an
expenditure of up to $4,500 to provide automatic control
of the old tower when it is being used for emergencies or
backup during maintenance or repairs to our now tank.
2. The second alternative would be to leave the system as it
Is and use the 60's-stylo mercury switches for operation
of the old tower and continue using manual operation for
the rest of the system during those periods.
15
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and
Water Superintendent that the City Council authorize an
expenditure of up to $4,500 for automatic control of the old
water tower to be completed in early 1992.
One other item concerning the old water tower is the painting
of the exterior. We have discussed this on previous occasions
and have budgeted in the original water improvement bond fund
for the repainting of the old tower. The Council may wish to
discuss this at this time and give the Public Works Director
some direction as to a possible color scheme and/or logo to be
used so that we can obtain quotes or estimates for the work to
be done in 1992.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of quote from Automatic Systems.
16
cam.
AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO.
May 23, 1991
CITY OF MONTICELLO
250 E. Broadway
Box 83
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
ATTENTION: Mr. John Simola
REFERENCE: Control addition to transmit
well 1/tower level to master.
Dear John:
T have been asked by Mr. Dean Sharpe of OSM to provide you with a
proposal for the addition and modifications necessary to
transmit the Old rower, water levol located aL well I to the master
panel located at the booster station.
I am pleased to provide you with the enclosed proposal. Should you
have any questions or wish to proceed with this proposal please
don't hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY
,UCO A -h
CC: Mr. Doan Sharpe/OSM
MANUFACTURER'S REPRESENTATIVES CONTROLS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
GrMAIN OFFICE: P.O. BOX 20490 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 86026 PHONE 612.546.2900
0 BRANCH OFFICE: P.O. BOX 787 AMES, IOWA 50010 PHONE 515-232.4770
G
AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO.
r 1, 7/ D P.O. BOR 28490 • ST. LOUIS PARR, MH 55426 • PHONE 512.545.2900
•P. 0. BOIL 787 • AMS, IOWA 60010 • PHONE 515.222-4770
O P.O. B011 Se • BOYS TOWN, HE 88010 • PHONE 402-320-5121
TO: CITY OF MONTICELLO QUOTATION/ ASC9105230B
250 E. Broadway Box 83 PROPOSAL NO.:
Monticello, Minnesota 553VATE: May 23. 1991
SUBJECT: Control addition to transP.O.B.. FactorY-
Frt. allowed to
Old 'Tower level to master. Monticello, Mn.
APPROVAL DRAWINGS:
BID DATE: N/A
SHIPMENT:3-5 Weeks After Receipt
1 r of an acceptable orde
QUOTATION PAGE:—OF
EXPIRES: June 23, 1991
QUOTATION /PROPOSAL
This quotation constitutes an offer to furnish the Items listed subject to; terms and conditions
stated hereon; receipt of your purchaso order by Automatic Systems Co.; Ames. Iowa; and a
written acceptance of your order by Automatic Systems Co. and/or the manufacturer(s) Involved
as follows:
A One (11 Custom Pressure transducer panel, Noma 12. 120Vac
for metal lation and connection to the existing well
01 RTU and tower pressure tap and tubing.
Prupused panel shall be factory fabricated.
assembled, wired, painted, and tested and complete
Witt) the following:
LOW Powered Foxboro Model 841 Prosoure transducer
with block and bleed volvo.
0-100 psi gauge, calibrated in feet and psi.
Freeze and condensation protection heaters.
B One (I Lot labor and materials as required to add a 24 Vdc
power- supply and modify well 1 RTU to accept the
transducer input.
C One (1) Lot Labor- and programming as required to modify the
plaster panel to incorporate the new tower signal as
folluwa:
D
AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO.
YANUFACTUIIIS IIFIISINTATIVI QUOTATION/ ASC910523QB
r] P.O. BOX 26490. ST. LOUIS PARK. UN W26 • PHONE 612.545-2900 PROPOSAL NO.:
( ] P.O. BOX 767 • AYES. IOWA 60. PHONE 6152]2-4770
0 P.O. BOX U • BOTS 001TOWN. NE 69010 . PHONE 402.895.6464 DATE: MAY 23, 1991
PAGE-.L-OF4
QUOTATION/ PROPOSAL
New Lower signal Wt 11 Share the existing Lower Ieve l
display. The existing two position switch which now
reads "System Pressure"/"Elev Tower" will be
provided with a new nametag to read "Old Tower"/
"New Tower". When the switch in the "Old Tower"
position the Old Tower level will be displayed on
the existing digital display and the booster pumps
will be controlled from this process variable. when
the switch in the "New Tower" position the New Tower
level will be displayed on the existing digital
display and the booster pumps will be controlled
from this process variable.
Your neL price for Items A through C above,
including two (2) copies of updated drawings and one
year warranty on above egt.ripment......... IL592,00,
The nbnve price for Items A through C does not
inClLlde Oily: '
Saler, or use tax.
Spere parts of any kind.
Irrstnllation of pressure transducer panel.
Installation of pressure tap or tubing.
Conduit. wire or cable or installation thereof of
any kind.
Neat tracing tope.
Labor. or any other miscollonoous materials that may
be required for installation not specifically
detailed above.
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
to. Consideration of vurchasina 79 extra 65-qallon carts for the
garbage proqram. W.S. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At a previous meeting the City Council authorized the purchase
of the 222 carts from the pilot program to be made available
to residents on a first-come first -serve basis. We have
approximately 150 carts distributed and/or spoken for at this
time even though a newsletter regarding the program has not
yet gone out to residents. The original 65 -gallon carts the
City used during the pilot program were moca brown with black
lids rather than the green the City requested. tarn Carts had
agreed to replace the moca brown 65 -gallon carts with the
green carts, and those have been ordered with expected
delivery in early December. About half of the 65 -gallon moca
brown carts are still in use in the pilot study area, and
about half of them are in storage at the old fire hall.
tarn Carts, Inc., has indicated they do not have a buyer for
the moca brown carts with black lids at this time and have
asked if the City would be willing to purchase those at a
significant discount, better than the already discounted price
of $53 per unit. They have indicated they would be willing to
sell those carts to the City for a cost of $44.75 each for a
savings of $651.75 for the 79 carts. In addition, City
employees would not have to pick up the existing moca brown
carts and exchange them for the new green ones, which would
result in an additional savings to the City.
We have had some positive comments from residents about the
moca brown and black carts, and also we have had some input
that indicates that it may be better to have the 65 -gallon
carts a different color than the 95'a so that they are eaally
distinguishable.
The City staff would, therefore, like to purchase the extra 79
moca brown 65 -gallon carts for $44.75 each for a cost of
$3,535.25. We would save $651.75 over our original
anticipated exponditure this year, as well as man-hours in not
having to wash and switch carts around. The existing 79 green
65 -gallon carts on order would be switched to moca brown and
black and would bocomo our standard color for the 65 -gallon
carts. Those carts would not be dolivered until 1992 but
still at the original price of $53 por cart. They would
probably be delivered a couple of months sooner than our
anticipated next order date, but it is expected that we will
have enough orders by then to be able to distribute them
almost immediately.
17
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
a. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to authorize the purchase of 79
extra 65 -gallon moca brown and black carts from ABM
Equipment 6 Supply Inc., the Zarn distributor in Hopkins,
Minnesota, at a cost of 244.75 or $3,535.25 with an
estimated total savings to the City in the neighborhood
of $800.
2. The second alternative is not to purchase the extra carts
but to continue with a plan to get all green carts and
exchange those 65 -gallon carts in the field with the
green carts when they arrive.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public works Director and City
Administrator that the City Council authorize purchase of the
additional 79 moca brown and black 65 -gallon carts from ABM
Equipment and Supply as outlined in alternative 31 and switch
to the moca brown and black as the standard color for the 65 -
gallon containers. This will result in an approximate $800
savings to the City of Monticello. Should the cart prices
/ increase with future purchases, this would allow us to keep
our current rental rates at $1.00/31.25 a month for longer in
the future.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of quote from ABM Equipment 6 Supply for the 79 existing
moca brown and black 65 -gallon carts.
is
e -
D N° 1221
Equipment & Supply Inc..:
t 612.938-5451
-✓y OUOTATiON— 1670 SOUTH 2ND STREET FAX 1.612-938-0159
IJ UHDEH HOPKINS. MN 55343 WATS 1.800.229.5451
Custom Truck Equipment for the Utility, Construction, Municipal and Refuse Industries
Tn C /71_1 n r- 111 U rJTI C (a & L_ CJ
Street '-2—%7-IJ 1: p Iib AIL LV rl L)
Cityl8tate Yv- u kn I r k/ 161 r f �J
For
Address
Expected Chassis Arrival Data
TRACK WetE I YCAa I Y00(1 I we
1
DIV.
Date J �- a
Req. By /
Terms Pc3 7- 12YU
Territory
P.O. No.
Phone Number
U I IMHSwSr" I IRE 111E REAR
UwT MCE W..1 PRICE
170 Z ARA_�� (c •5 _2�_/_/-�rcr CAR_ -TS — —
f' hluCeI, _ o C---f-GvX's w/ � 05
_nJ c.Qr—aa/
.1►.47Arn c�=��U
DISCLAIMERS
Any waI ramlas on the products Bald horony aIe Ihr,,so of Iho mnnulMlurar, As tmlween this Well salter and buyer, all products aro Sold In an AS 19 condition,
T ho ordh he rise as the clunlily and Polar mancorald w the product 1s in the buyal, S011el dam drMonSty rollael fmm mesmg only teproserdnllons er wtnraneos, and
does hereby disclaim any and all aaldiaa. A+P"s OF Impllad. INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF IIERCHANTADILI T Y OR FITNESS FOR A PAR-
I OCULAR PURPOSE, whether arising ttom statute, commmn Inw, custom m alhotwlso Iho romody sol forth In 1 rltsagroomonl Moll be Ina exclusive mmady
niolloble to any Posen, No person has any authority to bind the sollm to any roprosumallon of warrenlyaher than thlsdlaclalma. i his disclaimer by this salter
in noway afloclS Iho le. mS et Iho mSnuteClural S wantonly
Tno eallol shall ho' be lintels la any consequential damages resulting from the use of this product or caused by airy defect, failure a malfunction of any prod•
ucl, whotner a claim let such damage is basedupon warranty, commdt, negligonco or a gesso.
The buyer acknowledges being informed of IM abouo disclaim(" prim to solo.
MINNESOTA BALES TAI MUST Of ADDED Ruyerl Slgnaurax /1
OR TA a EICURtON CERTITICAT! rURNIBHCD
ACCEPTED:
t - STOMER --- _ _ –py— –.– -13—
By
aI•rwrr.rnr,Tpemxaa•vare .•roarer• Irrnr•w•Iyrwur.mrrrrwlne•x •unnxrrrera arllnrt. tlrwntirnn
• Or Bringing you the best nonfds 1n the buslressa DAD
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
>>• Consideration of a request for an extension of the completion
date for the sanitary sewer hookup --West Kiellberqs Mobile
Home Park. (R.W.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
For almost a year now, the City staff has been working with
Mr. Kent Kjellberg, owner of the West Kjellbergs Mobile Home
Park, in regard to his request to hookup the park to our
sanitary sewer system. As you may recall, the City Council
adopted a resolution which accepted his petition for
annexation of the west mobile home park whereby the City
agreed along with the Monticello Township Board to submit a
joint resolution for annexation provided the sanitary sewer
connection was completed by December 31, 1991.
As expected, Mr. Kjellberg was not meeting the scheduled time
lines for completion of an approved set of plans and
specifications, which were required by June 1, but only
recently submitted his set of plans for review in late
October. In August or September, an inadequate set of plans
was presented, which only indicated the route the connection
was to be made upon, and a revised set of plans was submitted
with topographic information the last week of October. The
City staff, along with City Engineer, Bret Weiss, immediately
reviewed the plans and responded to Mr. Kjellberg's engineer
with comments and noted deficiencies (see copy of
correspondence from City Engineer).
As anticipated, it did not appear that Mr. Kjellberg would be
completing the force main construction by the end of the year,
and on Monday, November 18, I received a letter requesting an
extension of time to complete the project until spring of
1992. While Mr. Kjollberg's loiter is correct in indicating
that he was still waiting approval from our engineer, the
letter does not note that we responded with our review of the
plans immediately on October 30; and to this date, we have had
no response from Mr. Kjollberg nor his engineer regarding our
review. All along we have attempted to respond as soon as
Information was provided so that we would not be holding up
his construction schedule.
As part of the joint annexation resolution whereby we agreed
to annex the property once it was connected to the city sewer,
we also agreed to a number of concessions in an effort to make
the sewer connection more feasible for Mr. Kjellberg. The
normal hookup charge was based on an estimated $125 per mobile
home rather than our normal 3300 per unit charge, and we
agreed to finance the hookup charge over fivo years at 6.51
Interest, Those favorable terms wore agreed upon realizing
19
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
that the hookup charge would be in the neighborhood of
825,000. Since that time, it has become more apparent that
the east mobile home park, which has been in the city since
1988, may not receive city sanitary sewer in the foreseeable
future. The east park was planned to be connected to the city
system after phase II of the Evergreens residential
development, but this development has never occurred. As a
result, it may be time for the City to re-examine its position
regarding annex Ang the west mobile home park until such time
as the east mob.Ile home park is connected to the sewer.
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has taken a firmer
position on requiring both mobile home parks to be either
connected to the city system or have their systems upgraded to
meet PCA standards . The FCA has notified Mr. Kjellberg that
both mobile home parks were to be connected by the end of the
year; but at the present time, Mr. Kjellberg has no plans to
connect the east park until such time as his residential
development occurs. While we have been expecting the east
park to be connected since 1988, and it still has not
happened, the Council may want to re-examine whether we should
grant an extension for completing the west mobile home park
hookup since the City did not cause any of the delays. I
would like to inform Mr. Kjellberg of the City's position
regarding his extension request and our position regarding
annexation.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Council can grant an extension to Mr. Kjellberg for
completion of the west mobile home park sewer extension
until spring of 1992 and agree to accept his annexation
petition at that time. Any terms and conditions agreed
to in regard to hookup foes, financing terms, etc., could
remain the same.
Council could decide that since Mr. Kjollberg had a year
to accomplish the hookup, the terms and conditions of
annexation could chango if tho hookup is not completed by
Docember 31, 1991.
Under th ie alternative, the Council may want to
reconsidor accopting annexation of the west mobilo home
park and allowing the sower connection to occur until the
oast mobilo home park is connected. The logic is that
the oast mobilo home park is already in the city since
1988, and should we be encouraging property outside of
the city to be connected without enforcing the property
within tha city to be connected first.
C� � •G.;�.a � . �.tny ..,o tt h a - ' ( ) ( w 331-i on. A '-)
20
Council Agenda - 11/25/91
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
In 1988, the City staff felt that the best alternative
available at that time was to allow the east mobile home park
to be connected as part of phase II of the Evergreens
subdivision plat. The City staff assumed that within a
reasonable amount of time development would occur, and the
sewer connection would be made; but as of today, there are no
developers interested in the Evergreens. At this point, we
have no idea when the east mobile home park will be connected.
As a result, the City staff would be in favor of a Council
decision to re-examine allowing the west mobile home park to
connect prior to the east mobile home park hookup. Regardless
of our extension of time approval or not, the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency may wish to start enforcement
proceedings immediately. I assume if the City Council agrees
to allow Mr. Kjellberg additional time to complete the sewer
connection, the PCA may be willing to wait on any enforcement
action; but also if the City Council does not grant an
extension, the PCA may take other legal action.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Letter from Kent Kjellberg dated November 15, 1991; Copy of
resolution accepting petition for annexation adopted
January 14, 1991; Copy of letter from OSM to Kent Kjellberg
dated October 30, 1991.
1000 Kiellberg's Park
Monticello, MN 55362
November 15, 1991
Mr. Rick Wolf steller, City Administrator
City of Monticello
P.0 Box 1 147
Monticello, MN 55362
Re. Sewer Force Main for Kje I Itierg's West Park
OearMr. Wolfsteller,
At the present time, we are still waiting for approval from your engineer 1
for our West Sewer Force Main.
The delays we are encountering In getting approval has made our original
plans impossible to make as if ar as dates of completion,
We respectfully request an extension of the completion date to early
spring, Thank you for your time and consideration In this matter.
Sincerely,
l
Kent KJeI(bei --
President
er Brian Dcble
KK/cz
A Member 01 The KJellberg Group Since 1929 k
(612) 295.2931 Metro 333.2231 Fax (512) 295.2991 (Ir'
RESOLUTION 91-3
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, Kent Kjellberg, owner of territory described below,
requests that the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, annex this
territory to the city and to extend the city boundaries to include
the same; and
WHEREAS, the territory requested to be annexed consists of
approximately 120 acres, all of which is entirely within the county
of Wright, Minnesota, and the description of such land is as
follows:
Section 15, Township 121, Range 25, Unplatted Land
SE S of a line beg 100.20 Rds S of SE post
W 19 Roads N 28D E 14 Rds W 147 Rds to I-4
Line exc S 2 Rds W of Rd.
WHEREAS, the territory described above abuts directly upon the city
limits at the southwest boundary thereof, and none of it is
presently included within the corporate limits of any incorporated
city; and
WHEREAS, annexation of this parcel is consistent with the land use
guide plan adopted by the Monticello Orderly Annexation area; and
WHEREAS, the parcel is primarily developed as a mobile home park
and has been directed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to
either upgrade the on-site sewage disposal system or make
connection to the City of Monticello sewer system; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is now capable of providing
municipal sanitary sewer service to this area; and
WHEREAS, the annexation petition has boon referred to the
Monticello Township Board for their review and comments in
accordance with the joint urbanization plan agreement; and
WHEREAS, tho Monticello Township Board has agreed to enter into a
joint resolution with the City of Monticello to allow for the
annexation of the mobile home park property (exact acreage to be
determined) provided the property owner either constructs the sewer
connection to the city system or provides a suitable guarantee of
upfront funds to cover the cost of the sewer system connection
equal to 1254 of the estimated cost.
NOW, THEREFORE, be It resolved that the City of Monticello hereby
agrees to accept said petition for annexation and agrees to proceed
With the Monticello Township Board in submitting a joint resolution
for annexation to the Municipal Board at the time the petitioner
starts construction of a sanitary sewer connection with the
understanding that construction will be completed by
December 31, 1991.
Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of nuar , 19 1.
f Mayor
City Administrator //
2021 East nenneon Avenue
Minneapolis. MN65413
612.33144
FAX 331.3806
October 30, 1991 Englncers
Architects
Planners
surve}vrs
Mr. Kent Kjellberg
Kjellberg's Inc.
1000 Kjellberg's Park
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Sanitary Sewer Hookup
West Mobile Home Park
OSM Project No. 1748.00
Dear Mr. Kjellberg:
We have received the revised engineering plans for the above referenced project. 17te plans
still do not meet the regulations specified in the "Recommended Standards for Sewage
Works 1990 Addition" and should be revised accordingly. Please note that an P4PCA permit
must be acquired prior to the start of any construction. We have enclosed a copy for
preparation by your engineer and then signature by the City Engineer. As we have
previously stated, it is recommended that Kjellheres. Inc., construct a 10•inch gravity
sanitary sewer line on the cast side of Ilighway 25 for collection of the sewage discharge
from both the west and east parks via separate lift stations. This 10 -inch gravity line could
also serve a limited amount of Evergreen property along Ilighway 25. This line should be
placed along the proposed frontage road alignmeit as recommended by the City Planner.
This line would provide for connection of both parks to a common system and will save the
cost of two separate force mains. The following items were noted during a city staff review
of the plans:
Sewer hookup shall be performed after acquisition of a sewer hookup permit from
the City of Monticello. The hookup charges will be billed upon completion of the
project and startup of the lift station. In addition, an excavation permit will be
required when working within city property or public right-of-way. The excavation
permit fee is $25. City ordinance requires that a bond shall be posted for I.5 times
the value of the work performed on city property or public right-of-way. The
Contractor shall supply sl Certification of Insurance. No work shall be started until
these permits have been Issued and the necessary bonds and insurance are provided.
A minimum of seven feet of cover over the pipe must be maintained at all times
throughout the length of the project. The plans as drawn show areas where seven
feet of cover cannot be obtained. In these areas, it will be necessary to insulate the
pipe with 4 inches of extruded rigid board insulation four feet wide.
r4w�nryvrro"pati.y„
Mr. Kent Kjellberg
October 30, 1991
Page 2
3. The PVC pipe used shall be pressure rated for 150 psi working capacity, not 150 psi
burst strength. The Contractor shall pressure test the force main at 150 psi prior to
startup of the system. If PVC pipe will be used, it should be SDR21 pressure rated.
A locating or trace wire shall be included for the length of the pipe line.
4. Manholes and clean out fittings shall be installed just after the bend at Station
29+00 and before the bend at Station 46+00.
5. The jacking/augering under Highway 25 will require the Contractor to obtain a
permit from MnDOT. In addition, the plans indicate insufficient cover in the area
of the Highway 25 ditches. 'Phis area should be insulated as previously stated. The
casing pipe shall be steel or approved equal and shall be blown full of sand after
placement of the force main pipe.
6. No thrust blocking is indicated at Station 46+50. Blocking should be provided at all
changes in direction.
7. The angle to the existing manhole from Station 52+00 to 52+70 is inappropriate.
The force main should enter the manhole perpendicular to the center line of Dundas
Road.
8. Kjeliberg's, Inc. shall obtain all casements at their own expense prior to the start of
construction.
9. The force main on city property from Station 9+50 to 26+25 should be centered
within the 20 -foot permanent casement.
10. 'iltc location and elevation of the proposed force main shall be staked by a registered
land surveyor prior to construction to verify conformance with the plans. The plan
should note benchmarks along the length of construction for staking purposes.
11. All construction shall he inspected by the City of Monticello's Inspector or the City
Engineer. 'Iliere shall be no exceptions. Any work backfilled without inspection
shall be re -excavated at the Contractor's expense. The first 40 hours of inspection
by the City Inspector shall be included in the sewer hookup fee. Additional
inspection required by the City Engineer or City Inspector will be billed to
Kjeliberg's, inc., at the applicable hourly rates.
12. Special construction may be required on the force main in the area of the existing
well near Station 20+00. The location of the well should be staked in the field. 'fbe
Mr. Kent Kjellberg
October 30, 1991
Page 3
minimum separation shall be as required by the Minnesota Department of Health.
13. The fill in the area of Station 12+00 shall not extend beyond the temporary
easement. Insulation shall be provided over or below any pipe not having a depth
of cover of seven feet or below the proposed culvert.
14. A restoration plan should be submitted with the plan set.
15. UR Station - The design calculations for the lift station capacity shall be submitted
to the City Engineer. Preliminary calculations show that the wet well is undersized,
which could cause the pumps to run continuously. The design should be verified.
This information shall include the number of units to be served, discharge per unit
and peaking factor. The total dynamic head and GPM of the system should be
provided. 'lite lift station shall be designed to conform to the requirements outlined
in the "Recommended Standards for Waste Water Facilities 1990 Addition".
A. The size of the u-ct well shall be verified that it is adequate in relation to the
pump size. 'Ilse pump type and size shall be provided along with the head
and GPM capacities of the pump.
B. The construction of the lift station shall be such that it is water tight.
C. The station shall be designed with duplex pumps. Pumps shall be submersible
sewage type lift pumps. No bypassing of the pumps shall be allowed.
0. no wet well typical section should be drawn more accurately to show the
elevation of inlet and outlet pipes. The liquid sensor configuration should
include a low-level alarm and lag pump on. The plan pump off elevation as
shown should he a 948.25. The high level alarm shall be placed below the
inlet elevation.
I''. Quality hour meters shall be provided and located in the control box for
access by the City. The meters shall be calibrated annually.
P. A separate valve manhole is requ ired for containing the check valve and gate
valve on the discharge side of the pump. The check valve placement shown
on the plans is not acceptable.
G. The grade around the lift station shall be such that no rainwater can enter the
lift station.
N/
Mr. Kent Kjellberg
October 30, 1441
Page 4
H. The Owner shall provide the City with a right of entry and access to the lift
station to verify operation and for reading the meter.
A ladder shall be added to the lift station with a ladder -up device for entry.
Periodically, the lift station will have to be cleaned and access is essential.
J. A locking cover shall be provided on the cover to the wet well and the
electrical control panel.
K. Lifting chains shall be provided an securely attached to the pump. With a
flooded lift station, it is almost impossible to find the pump with a chain and
hook.
L The type of pipe used inside the lift station wet well is not shown. It should
be ductile iron pipe.
M. No electrical details are shown or controls described or the system. These
should be provided with the revised pians.
16. A MPCA permit is required for the extension of sewer. Construction shall not begin
prior to acquiring the permit. This permit form should be prepared by your engineer
and signed by the City Engineer.
17. A soil boring shall be taken in the area of the lift station to determine groundwater
and soil types to a point three feet below the proposed bottom.
18. A detailed as -built plan noting location and elevation of the existing sanitary sewer
system for the West ['ark should be included with the plan submittal. '11is should
be kept separate from the construction drawings.
14. 'ne plans should show all existing public utilities including gas, electric, telephone,
etc. The permits for crossing these lines shall be the responsibility of Kjellberes, Inc.
20. The inlet pipes to the lift station shall enter through boots to eliminate exfiltration
of sewage. All materials to be used must be inspected by the City and be free from
defects. The City reserves the right to reject any materials.
21. Please comment on the design of a gravity force main. This is unusual and could
result in a higher cost construction project. What are the intentions of your engineer
designing the force main in this manner? 'there may be a need for an air relief valve
Mr. Kent Kjellberg
October 30, 1991
Page 5
(sewage type) at the upstream end of the force main.
Please make the noted revisions and resubmit the plans along with specifications and design
calculations. We would be happy to meet with your engineer to discuss any or all of these
items at a mutually convenient time.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCI IELEN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIA , INC.
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
City Engineer
4 Ccs ��
%�
Rick Wolfsteller
City Administrator
/cmw
1030kk
John Simola
Public Work Director
c: Mr. Brian Dobic, P.E., Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc.
Mr. Todd 1?ckberg, MPCA
1%RC FINANC)AL SV91'E14
10/31/91 19:73:5,
WARRANT f1t.1E VENDOR
GENERAL CIJECKING
37409 10/30/01 CHIPPEWA VALLEY
32410 10/30/91 OAVIO BURG�;PAFF
37411 10/30/91 VAS -KO P.UC•F.ISH REMOVA
32411 10/30/91 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
32412 10/30/91 FOREST r,ITY ROAD LAN
32413 10/30/91 EMPRO
32414 10/30/91 U.3. POSIMASTER
37414 10/30/91 U.S. POSTMASTER
32615 10/30/91 PINI IC EMPLOYEES RET
32610 10/30/911 11JC1J0UIST PAPER COMP
37617 10/00/91 ANTHONY GANYAI
32619 10/30/91 ADOPT-A•PET
37619 10/30/SI MONTTCELLO ANIMAL CO
1?hn0 10/311/91 MN 11FPARr OF NATURAL
17671 10/30/91 MIN DEPART OF NATURAL
11412 ID/317/91 AI.I,IFD BLACKTOP COMP
07b73 10/00/91 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SU
GENERAL INFCKING
Olsbursemenr ,loiornnl
DESCRIPTION tMpIOJT CLAIM JNv1
90169 SEMINAR kEG/KAREN DOTY 30.00
90171 REFUND - SEWER -WATER AIL 10.00
524 SEPT GARBAGE 6711 7.995.57
524 SALES TAX/C,AROAGE A11. 519.71
0.515.23
563 SEPT A00'L LANDFILL C 729.90
90170 WWTP HEATING SYSTEM 300.30
210 POSTAGE/SEWER-WATER A 115.39
210 POSTAGE/SEWER-WATER B 175.37
350.75
176 PERA CONT/8 FYLE. 56.03
200 COMPUTER PAPER 131.16
90177 REIMS/RENT DEPOSIT 36.?7
6 ANIMAL AOOPTIONa 1.032.00
185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1.01x..00
118 WATERCRAFT/SNOW/AIV R 190.00
118 WATERCRAFT TITLE REPOR 84.00
552 FINAL. PYMr/SEAI.COAT 3.806.33
114 INSULATION/WWTP HTO S 17b.30
TOTAL 16.426.67
•CIIECK TOTAL
•CIIEI'K TOIAI
t%RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/07/91 11:46:48 Disbursement Journal
4 WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVO
GENFRAL CHECKING
32426 11/06/91 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 165 ANIMAL FOOD SUPPLIES 145.25
32425 11/06/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 166 UTILITIES 1.523.46
32426 11/06/91 MAPA .90176 REG FEE/T BOSE/SEMINA 100.00
32427 11/06/91 ANOKA TECHNICAL COLL .90173 REG FEE/T ROSE/SEMINA 275.00
32426 11/06/91 ANOKA TECHNICAL COLL .90173 REG FEE/T BOSE/SEMINA 275.00
32429 11/06/91 INTERNAL REVENUE SER 405 PAYROLL WITHHOLDINGS 96.07
32430 11/06/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 116 WATERCRAFT/SNOW/ATV R $37.00
32431 11/09/91 ADAM'$ PEST CONTROL 3 CITY HALL PEST CONTROL 52.50
32432 11/00/91. AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 7 BOND ISSUANCE FEE 637.50
32433 11/06/91 ANNANDALE VETERINARY 362 ANIMAL VET FEES 16.00
32434 11/00/91 BIFF6. INC. 395 LATRINE RENTAL 70.00
32435 11/00/91 BIG LAKE LUMBER 316 WWTP HEATING SYSTEM 151.30
32436 11/06/91 BRADLEY 9 OEIKE 558 LEGAL FEES/6HINGOBEE 12.00 ,
32437 11/06/91 9RIOGRWATF.R TELF,PHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 649.23
32437 11/08/91 BR JDGEWATER TELFPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 116.91
32431 11/06/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 67.06
32437 11/06/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 27.91
32431 11/08/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 81.41
37437 11/09/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 26 PHONE CHARGES 98.25
32437 11/00/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 20.00
32437 11/08/01 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 26 PHONE CHARGES 13.00
32437 11/06/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 26 PHONE CHARGES 80.07
32437 11/09/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 26 PHONE CHARGES 20.00
32437 11/08/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 26 PHONE CHARGES 36.28
32437 11/09/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 76 PHONE, CHARGES 36.40
32437 11/n8/9I BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 10.00
32437 11/08/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGFS 10.74
12437 11/08/91 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 21.30
1.290.15 NCHECK TOTAL
32636 11/09/91 CPLI.ULAR ONE 666 CIVIL DEFENSE PHONP, CH 39.99
37439 11/09/91 CITY OF MONTICELLO .90150 REIMB/SEWER AND BIL 2.517.44
32440 11/09/91 CONCRETE SAWING INC. $97 WWTP HEATING SYSTEM! 327.00
A
DRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
"
11/07%91.
11:48:48
Disbursement
Journal:
WARRANT
DATE
'VENDOR
DESCRIPTION' ,AMOUNT-
CLAIM ."INVC,
GENERAL CHECKING
•
32441
11/08/91
,6UERR'S WATER CARE S
49
WWTP RENTAL WATER CARE
14.25
32042
1.1/09/91
FEEDRITE CONTROLS. I
SS
PROF,SERVICES/WATER
11.00
32443
11/08/91
GENERAL RENTAL CENTE
64
WWTP HEATINO SYSTEM
75.00
32444
11/08/91
GOULD BROS. CHEV-OLO
70
VEHICLE PARTS/SEWER C
141.22
32445
11/08/91
HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
78
VEHICLE PARTS/MATER
8.-66
32445
11/08/91
HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
78
EOUIP PARTS/WATER
"S.88
32445
11/09%91
IIARRV'S LAUTO SUPPLY
78
LUBRICANTS/SEWER
23.76
32445
11/08/91
HARRV'S AUTO SUPPLY
78
SMALL TOOLS/SHOP & GAR
12.49
32445
11/00/91
HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
78
VEHICLE PARTS/STREETS
143.86
194.73
•CHECK TOTAL
32440
11/09/91
HENNEPIN TECH COLLEG
.90175
REG FEE/DOTY & KRAEMER
87.00
32447
11/08/91
HERMES/JERRY
81
LIBRARY CLEANING CONT
227.50
32448
11/08/91
HIGH TECH ROOFING
$58
WWTP HEATING SYSTEM
624.00
32440
11/09/91
HIGH TECH ROOFING
5S6
WWTP RENTAL REPAIRS
839.82
1,263.92
*CHECK TOTAL
-32449
11/08/91
HOGLUND BUS COMPANY
92
VEHICLE REPAIRS/STREET
44.62
32440
11/08/91
HOGLUND.BUS COMPANY
02
MISC SUPPLIES%SEWER
5.00
49:82
*CHECK TOTAL
32450
11/09/91
HOLIDAY CREDIT OFF.IC
05
GAS/FIRE DEPARTMENT
78:78
"
32451
11/00/91
HOLMES & GRAVEN
'88
PROF SERVICES/AROPLAX
81.25
-
32452
1,1/08/91
INTER CITY MANAGEMEN
416
SUB RENEWAL/J ONEIL'L,
208.00
" 32453
'11/08/91
;MANPOWER, INC.
640
TEMP SERVICES/CITY HA,
318.06
32454
11/60/91
MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC
107
GLOVES/STREET, OEP.T
15;.21
"
3,2455
11/08/91
MIDWEST OAS COMPANY
115
UTILITIES
13 4. 21
. •32455
11/Oels)
AITOWE9T GAS -COMPANY
115
UTILITIES
05.39
32455
1,1/08/01
MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
119
-,UTA LI TI E9
22.40
-"
..32455
11_/08/91
MI64EST GAS. COMPANY.
115
UTILITIES
118.12
,
3,2455
.11,/08/91
MIOWEST GAS COMPANY
115
UTILITIES
26.60
32455
11/09/91
MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
115
UTILITIES
2.42
32455
11/00/91
MIDWEST GAS COMPANY"
1'15
UTILITIES
72.07
441.82
(CHECK TOTAL
32480
11/09/91
MINNESOTA U.C. FUND
130
EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
1.15'
A
ORC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/07/91 11:46:48
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
32457 1 1/08/91 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
32457 1 1/09/91 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
32450 1 1/08/91 MONTICELLO HOUSING 0
32450 1 1/08/91 MORRELL TRANSFER COM
32460 1 1/00/91 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
32460 1 1/00/91 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
32461 1 1/08/91 NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPA
32402 1 1/08/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE
32462 1 1/00/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE
32462 1 1/08/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE
32402 1 1/08/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE
32402 1 1/00/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE
32407 1 1/08/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE
32402 1 1/00/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE
32402 1 1/09/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE
32462 1 1/00/91 NORTHERN STATES POWF.
32662 1 1/08/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE
32402 1 1/08/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE
32663 1 1/00/91 NORWEST INVESTMENT S
37464 1 1/08/9,1 NUTECH ENVIRONMENTAL
32465 1 1/00/91 O.F.I. BUSINESS FORM
37430 f 1/00/91 OMANN BROTHERS. INC.
32407 1 1/08/91 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
37407 1 1/08/91 ORR-SCMELEN-MAYERON
32467 1 1/00191 ORR-SCMELEN-MAYERON
37487 1 1/08/01 ORR-SCHELEN-MAY ERON
32467 1 1/06/91 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
32467 1 1/09/91 ORR-SCHELEN-MAVERON
37408 1 1/00/91 POLKA OOT RECYCLING
32409 1 1/09/91 PR0PP.S71ONAL SERVICE
37400 1 1/01/91 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
F
Oi3bur9ement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVL1I
105 ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRA 500.00
185 TRAVEL EXPENSE 25.00
525.00
418 ANITFREEZE/PARKS DEPT 11.95
589 ODOR CONTROL BLD/S FRE 30.00
144 EQUIP REPAIRS/STREETS 21.21
144 MISC SUPPLIES/SHOP R G 24.00
45.21
588 STREET MTC MATERIAL 599.20
148 UTILITIES 2,780.65
140 UTILITIES 191.92
168 UTILITIES 3.792.Sh
148 UTILITIES 78.87
146 UTILITIES 354.72
148 UTILITIES 11 .4 1
148 UTILITIES 12.00
140 UTILITIES 223.47
148 UTILITIES 187.73
140 UTILITIES 453.10
149 UTILITIES 644.32
0,701.54
105 COMPUTER PAYMENT 2,607.01
107 VWTP CHEMICAL SUPPL 1.127.50
ISO COPY MACHINE PAPER 70.10
334 CLASS V/STREETS 02.11
162 PROF SERV/WWTP 544.01
102 MISC ENGINEERING F£ 2.409.56
162 ENO FEES/BRIAR OAKE 0,527.71
162 END FEES/CAROINAL H 7,765.44
102 ENG FEES/CTY RO 75 5,100.51
102 ENG FEES/FALLON AVE 1,123.50
16.550.59
170 RECYCLING CONTRACT 1,772.77
175 WWTP CONTRACT PAYM 26.491.50
175 IRO QT S FRESH SAMPLF 945.50
79,431.00
•CHECK TOTAL
•CHECK TOTAI.
•CHECK TOTAL
•CHECK TOTA1.
•CHECK TOTA1
VA
ORC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/07/91 11.48.48
/ WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
32470 11/08/91 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET
32471 11/08/91 RELIABLE CORPORATION
32472 11/08/91 SCHARBER 8 SONS. INC
32473 11/00/91 SCHLUENOER CONSTRUCT
37473 11/08191 SCHLUENOER CONSTRUCT
37474 11/08/91 SEELYE PLASTICS, INC
32475 11/08/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
32475 11/00/91 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
32478 11/08/91 SYSTEMS SERVICE COMP
32477 11/08/91 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
32477 11/08/01 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
32477 11/08/91 UNiTOG RENTAL SERVIC
32477 11/06/91 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
32477 11/08/61 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
32477 11/08/91 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
37470 11/09/91 UNOCAL
32479 ti/00/Rt WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVO
170
PERA CONTRIB/D SLONIGE 40.22
179
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
129.89
229
MTC OF VEHICLES/PARKS 225.80
107
WWTP HEATING SYSTEM
2,720.00
187
PALM ST HOUSE DEMON.
2,445.00
5,165.00
*CHECK TOTAL
$90
WWTP HEATING SYSTEM
178.70
193
WWTP HEATING SYSTEM
591.74
193
WWTP RENTAL HOUSE REPA 53.85
645.59
*CHECK TOTAI,
202
CHART PAPER/WATER DEP 170.28
211
UNIFORM RENTAL
6.58
211
UNIFORM RENTAL
6.56
211
UNIFORM RENTAL
12.90
211
UNIFORM RENTAL
12.80
2ti
UNIFORM RENTAL
85.85
211
UNIFORM RENTAL
42.80
!
167.41
*CHECK TOTAL
213
GAS/FIRE DEPT
22.15
512
UTILITIES
0.40
TOTAL
01,526.07
NRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/15/9/ 12:31:10
WARRANT DATE VFNDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
32480 11/15/91 MONTICELLO SENIOR Cl
32481 11/15/91 LINDBERG FI ASSOCIATE
32482 11/15/91 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
32483 11/15/91 FOREST CITY ROAD LAN
32483 11/15/91 FOREST CITY ROAD LAN
32484 1f/15/91 OLSON/JERRY
32485 11/15/91 HOGLUND COACH LINES
32460 if/15/91 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
32488 11/15/91 VASKO RVBBISH REMOVA
32487 11/15/91 COMMUNICATION AVOITO
32488 11/15/91 SENTRY SYSTEMS
32409 11/15/91 SCANNER WORLD . USA
32490 11/15/91 FOSTER-FRANIEN-CARLS
32491 11/15/91 MN OEPARF OF NATURAL
32492 11/15/91 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA
32483 11/10/91 UNIVERSITY OF MINNES
12494 1 1/15/9 1 TWIN CITY HARDWARE
32495 11/15/91 LUKACH/JOHN
32495 11/15/91 LUKACH/JOHN
32495 11/15/91 LUXACH/JOHN
32495 11/15/91 LUKACI4/JO14N
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journml
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INV.
139 NOV CONTRACT PAYMEN 2,833.33
577 BALANCE/F HALL PAIN 3,356.19
174 INSVRAIICE PREMIUM 289.24
583 LANDFILL CHARGES 5.690.25
S63 DUMP CHGS/WWTP RENTAL 42.50
5,332.35
159 TEMP BLD INSPECTION FE 25.00
483 OCT BUS TRANSP CONT 5,011.88
524 OCT GARBAGE CONTRAC 7.973.92
524 SALES TAX/GARBAGE CON 511.89
6.735.61
39 FIRE DEPT PAGER REPAI 112.50
188 FIRE ALARM/FIRE DEPT 126.00
591 NEW SCANNER/FIRE. DEPT 211.41
B1 INS PREMIUM/FIRE DEPT 542.54
118 WATERCRAFT/SNOW/ATV 1.119.00
90 REG FEE/SEMINAR/RICK W40.00
212 REG FEE/SEMINAR/GARY 105.00
593 THRESHHOLOS/INFO CENTS 10.60
321 TRAVEL EXPENSE 84.21
327 TRAVEL EXPENSE 21.40
327 TRAVEL EXPENSE 21.40
327 TRAVEL EXPENSE 21.41
116.42
TOTAL 26,061.80
*CHECK TOTAL,
•CHECK TOTAL
I
4CHECK fOTAI '
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/15/91 11:33:17
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING.
37496 11/26/91 A T & T INFO SYSTEMS
32497 11/26/91 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT
32498 11/26/91 BEN FRANKLIN
32499 11/26/91 BEN FRANKLIN
37498 11/26/91 BEN FRANKLIN
32499 11/26/91 BOSE/TOM
32500 11/26/91 BUSINESS PECORDS COP
37501 11/26/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/26/91 COAST TO COAST
37501 11/78/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/26/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/26/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/26/91 COAST TO COAST
37501 11/76/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/20/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/26/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/26/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/26/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/20/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/26/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/26/91 COAST TO COAST
37501 11/70/91 COAST TO COAST
32501 11/26/91 COAST TO COAST
32502 11/20/01 COPY OUPLCATING PROD
32503 11/26/91 DOTY/KARE,N
32504 11/20/91 OYNA SYSTEMS
37505 11/20/91 FEEORITE CONTROLS, I
32501 11/26/91 FEEORITE CONTROLS, I
12506 11/26/91 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE
32500 11/20/91 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE
37507 11/26/01 GLASS HUT/7HE
12108 11/26/91 GOODIN COMPANY
0191mreement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVO
15 FIRE PHONE CHARGES 5.30
355 MEMBERSHIP DUES/RICK 160.00
20 MAIL SERVICE/DATA PROC 14.75
20 MISC SUP/PW INSPECTIONS 7.53
20 MISC SVP/FALLON AVF 11.70
33.96
338 TRAVEL EXPENSE 88.50
27 FINANCE CHECKS 411.96
35 SMALL TOOLS/WATER DEPT 17.58
35 EQUIP PARTS/SNOW & ICE 24.06
35 MISC SUP/DARNS 114.05
35 EQUIP PARTS/STREETS 8.07
35 CLOTHING SVP/STREETS 3.67
35 EQUIP PARTS/PARKS 0.78
35 WWTP RENTAL HOUSE REPA 43.15
35 CLOTHING SUP/PARKS 5.28
35 MISC SUP/SEWER COLL 10.76
35 MISC SUP/WATER DEPT 29.06
35 BLD REPAIR SUP/WATER 31.14
35 WWTP HEATING SYSTEM 29.36
35 INFO CENTER REPAIRS 3.07
35 CLOTHING SUP/WATER 28.06
35 MISC SUP/FIRE DEPT 65.90
35 CLEANING SUP/LIBRARV 17.17
453.14
41 COPY MACH MTC/LIBRARY 50.40
40 TRAVEL EXPENSE 141.77
50 SHOP SUPPLIES 169.59
50 MISC PROF SERV/MATER 90.50
56 CHEMICALS/WATER 1,794.33
1,084.03
510 MISC SUPPLIES/FIRE OE 439.64
510 SMALL TOOLS/FIRE DEPT 27.00
466.64
66 NEW WINDOWS/INFO CE 1.714.30
504 WWTP HEATING SYSTEM 92.32
VCHECK TOTAL
*CHECK TOTAL
•CHECK TOTAL
•CIIECK T01 AI
DRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM,
11/15/91 1-1:33:11,
Disbursement
Journal
WARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION 'AMOUNT
CLAIM INV.
GENERAL
CHECKING
32509
11/28/91
GOPHER STATE ONE CAL
69
PROF SERV/WATER DEPT
105.00
32510
11/28/91
HENRY & ASSOCIATES
545
STREET MTC MATERIAL
101.10
32511
11/26/91
HERMES/JERRY
B1
LIBRARY CLEANING CONT
227.50
32512
11/26/91
INDUSTRIAL MAINT. SU
S14
SHOP SUPPLIES
329.71
32513
11/26/91
1 M 011 COMPANY
95
GAS/STREET DEPT
840.20
32513
11/26/91
1 M OIL COMPANY
95
GAS S OIL/FIRE DEPT
1,3.50
853.70
•C71ECK 7OT161
32514
11/26/91
KOLI_ES SAND & GRAVEL
592
SNOW REMOVAL SFRVICF,S
921.50
32515
11/26/91
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA
96
1991 CITIES DIRECTORY
19.50
32510
11/26/91
MANPOWER, INC.
440
TEMP SERVICES/CITY HA
127,20
32517
11/26/91
MAUS FOODS
108
SUPPLIES/CITY HALL
3.77
32517
11/28/91
MAUS FOODS
IDB
SUPPLIES/ANIMAL CONTRO
41.15
32517
11/26/91
MAUS FOODS
100
SUPPLIES/LIBRARY
37.36
32511
11/26/91
MASS FOODS
108
SUPPLIES/STREETS
10.38
92.06
*CHECK TOTA
12510
11/26/91
MON TICELLO OFFICE PR
136
OFFICE SUP/PARKS
1.20
32510
11/26/91
MONTICELLO.OFFICE PR
136
OFFICE SVP/ANIMAL
30.20
32510
11/28/81
MON TICELLO OFFICE PR
136
,CONT
OFFICE SUPPLIES/C HAL
84011
880..73
sCHE.CK f07A.
32519
11/.20/91
MON TICELLO PRINTING
137
OLD PERMIT FORMS
25,25
37520
11/20/01
MON TICELLO TIMES
140
LEAF PICKUP INFO
170.40
32520
11/26/91
MON TICELLD TIMES
140
WATER FLUSHING INFO
04,00
37520
11/20/91
MONTICELLO TIMES
140
LEGAL PUB/SIGNAL LITES
69.20
32520
11/26%81 MONTICELLO
TIMES
140
LEGAL PUB/SNOW'PLOW 01
40,24
-
32520
11/20/01
MONTICE L M TIME 9
140
LEGAL PUBLICATIONS
'813.04
32520
11/20/91
MON 7iCFI,LO TIMES
140
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES
43.29
32570
11/70/01
MONTICF,LLO TIMES
140
LIBRARY INFO
35.20
32520
11/26/91
MONT_IC9LLO,TIMES
140
BIOS/INFO CENTER
.50.23
1,001:50
*CHECK IOTA'
32521
11/20/01
PLUMOERY-PURCEIL'S P
751
HWTP RENTAL REPAIRS
14.50
37577
11/70/01
PRFUSSE'S CLEANING S
173
NOV CLEANING CONTRACT
400.00
j
32523
1.1/20/91
SAMUELSON/STEVE
S70
NOV FIRE HALL CLEANING
50.00
i
37524
t1/?6/01
SIENCEI/PEGGY
199
NOV ASSESSING SALARY
940.50
�: RRC dig NAIfC 1Al_SYSTFM;'.,'';
t'tl/t5/9i 3:''-1''•1 Dlstiur,seme'nt Journal
III
(� 'WARRANT- DATE: VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT_; CFAIM' INV6V I
GENF.RAL.CHECKING
1
32529 11/26%91 WRIGHT COUNTY AVDITO- 219 NOV SHERIFF'S CONT 14,336:95
I1
32526 II%26/91 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPO 226 NOV CONTRACT PAYMENT 625:00 '
32527 11/,26/91 ZIEGLER. INC'. 425-GRADER CHAINS 256:94
GENERAL�CHECRING' TOTAL 26.895.71
J\
/r
_
RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/20/91 16:05:12
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
S`
GENERAL CHECKING
Olsbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INV(
37473 11/20/91 SCHLUENOER CONSTRUCT 187 CODE. TO 602.40400.4 1,450.000R
32413 11/20/91 SCHLIIENUER CONSTRUCT 187 FROM 262.49201.5301 1,450.00
0.00
32527 11/20/91 ZIEGLER, INC. 425 CHECK VOIDED 258.94CR
32528 11/20/91 MONTICELLO CHAMBER 0 133 MONTICELLO MONEY/EXPO 50.00
32529 11/20/91 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL C .90175 REG FEE/SEMINAR 09.00
32530 11/70/91 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAFT/SNOW/ATV 1,019.00
32531 11/20/91 LATOUR CONSTRUCTION 465 CONST COSTS/FALLON 7,424.15
32531 11/70/91 LATOUR CONSTRUCTION 485 CONST COSTS/BRIAR 118,898.44
32531 11/20/91 LATOUR CONSTRUCTION 465 CONST COSTS/CAROIN 25.752.80
152.073.39
32532 1:/40/91 FIRE RADIO SERVICE F 598 LICENSE FEE/FIRE DEPT 350.00
32533 11/70/91 STATE OF MINNESOTA 451 SOFTWARE/FIRE DEPT 200.00
32534 11/20/91 NORTHERN STATES POWE 140 REIMS/WATER BILL RE 3,284.70
32535 11/20/91 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN 142 SNOW BLOWER/WTD 490.00
32536 11/26/91 AMER1 DATA 9 SEMINAR/OLLIE K 156.00
C '
37537 11/25/91 ARA CORY REFRESHMENT 408 SUPPLIES/CITY HALL 40.00
32538 11/28/91 BERGSTROM BROS. INC. 21 CHAINS/SNOW 0 ICE 30.50
32539 11/20/91 BERGSTROM'S LAWN 0 G 441 PARTS/PARKS DEPT 76.02
32540 11/20/01 ROSE/TOM 336 TRAVEL EXPENSE 39.00
37541 11/70/91 BUSINESS RECORD$ CDR 27 W'2 FORMS 78.99
32542 11/20/91 C J BROWN BUSINESS S 007 SUPPLIES/EXPO 91 200.51
32543 11/26/91 CHAP3N PUBLISHING CO 31 LEGAL PUB/SIGNAL LITE 213.00
32544 11/20/91 FIRE SAFETY CORPORAT 505 GLOVES/STREET DEPT 294.89
37545 11/76/01 K MART STORE 460 SUPPLIES/EXPO 91 100.73
32546 11/28/91 KMOM SUPER SHOPPER 500 ADVERTISINGAUS TRANS 225.10
32547 11/70/91 MANPOWER, INC. 440 TEMP SERVICES/CITY MA 159.00
&CHECK TOTAL
•CHECK TOTAL
(/
F�
L
C
U
ERC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/20/91 16:05:12
WARR ANN DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
32548 11/26/91 MARCO BUSINESS PROOU
32549 11/26/91 MN STATE FIRE DEPART
32550 11/26/91 MOBIL '
32550 11/26/91 MOBIL
32550 11/25/91 MOBIL
32550 11/26/91 MOBIL
32551 11/26/91 NORTHERN POWER PRODU
32552 11/26/91 NUTECH ENVIRONMENTAL
32553 11/26/91 U.S. POSTMASTER
32554 11/26/91 VISU-SEWER CLEAN A S
32554 11/26/91 VISU-SEWER CLEAN A S
32554 11/76/91 VISU-SEWER CLEAN F. S
32554 11/28/91 VISU-SEWER CLEAN A S
325.55 11/26/91 WALOOR PUMP A EQIIIPM
37555 11/28/91 WALDOR PUMP A EQUIPM
32559 11/26/91 WATER PRODUCTS COMPA
32556 1 1/20/9 1 WATER PRODUCTS COMPA
72557 11/20/01 MEIN/JF.RRV
37559 11/26/91 WRIGHT COUNTY BAG CO
32559 11/28/91 ZIEGLER, INC.
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVO
108 LABELS/OFFICE SVD/C H 138.13
437 MEMBERSHIP FEES/FIRE D 90.00
131 GAS/BLD INSPECTIONS 43.04
131 GAS/STREET DEPT 57.51
131 GAS/MATER DEPT 63.62
131 GAS/SEVER COLLECTIONS 63.62
227.78
596 CARB KIT/SNOW A ICE 39.60
157 FREIGHT/CHEMICALS/WWT 125.00
210 ANNUAL MAILING FEE 75.00
$99 SEWER TELEV/FALLON AV 219.75
599 SEWER TELEV/BRIAR OAK 375.00
599 SEWER TELEV/CARDINAL 375.00
599 SEVER TELEV/SEWER COL 291.25
1.250.00
369 EQUIP DARTS/SEWER COL 959.34
369 CONST COSTS/CARDINAL 131.16
1.007.50
210 CONST COSTS/FALLON AV 634.32
216 CONST COSTS/BRIAR OAK 211.44
845.70
385 TRAVEL EXPENSE/SEMINA 113.50
594 $AND BAGS/CIVIL OEFEN 270.00
425 DARTS/SNOW A ICE 2.925.80
TOTAL 100.094.87
•CHECK TOTAI
*CHECK TOIAL
•CHECK TOTAL
9CHECK TOTAL
.GPC rIIJf UC1AL SVS3FM
yF
Q.
In/31/111 IS: 35:72 Oisbur3em—t Journal
WnRFnllr pr.lE VF nuOR DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLAIM 1NV0
LIOUGP FUNn
19934 10/30/91 LAGLE VINE COMPANY 800012 WINE PURCHASE
83.70
11,91h 10/30/91 CAGI•E VINF. {'7MPANY 800012 MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE
35).41
416.71
lc"FrK TOTAI
15935 10/3U/1)I ,,^[Gf.>, COOPrR & COM 800018 LIOUOR PURCHASE
033.82
15036 10/3n/a1 GP•IG,:. (C,i)PE R & COM 000010 LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.070.66
15991 10/30/91 P1IILLIP9 & `U1JS CC/Il 600037 WINE PUFCIIASE
)7.4'+
15937 10/30/91 PmIII. IPS F SONS CO/E 900037 LIQUOR PURrIIASr
1.0?t.9h
1.959.39
*CIJEr'K TOfgL
1503A IO/10/91 rl ESrII'S PAPER SE RVI 800116 LIOUOR BAGS
107.15
I S91R 10/30/91 ENNIS CABINETS/.JIM 800110 DESK d CAB FOR C^MPUf 141.00
15940 10/30/91 JOHNSON OROS WHOLESA 000022 WINE PURCHASE
11)0.41
15941 10/30/91 H01.10.1Y EXPO 91 000119 REG FEE/SEMIIIAR/JQE
Ii h5.00
1494) 10/30/91 EACAE VINE COMPANV 900012 WINE PURCHASE
327.10
1591.3 10/30/91 GP.1,G9, COOPER & C•)M 800018 LIOUOR PURCHASE
1,518.10
,
19944 10/30/01 OJAI IIY W1NL A GP•IRT 000040 WINE PURCHASE
?94.1.t
1'i9r,r, 10/30/91 QUALITY WINE 1 SPIRT 800040 LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.01,4.57
1.330.98
3CHEi11' 10101
15945 10/3n/9I JOHNSON BROS WNOI.E3A 800022 LIQUOR PURCHASE,
992.31
15940 10/30/91 U S WEST COMMIWICATI 000093 ADVERTISING
?1.80
15917 10/10/91 JOHN$GN BROS WHOLF4A 000022 WINE PURCH4SF.
914.00
1991.8 tn/30/91 PIntLIPS I+ SON$ CO/E 000037 1.10UR PURCHASE
1.940.34
IWO In/10/91 PIIILI,IPS & SONS CO/E 000031 WINF. PURCHASE
20.41
1.97'11.75
•CHECK IOl At
15949 10/30/01 Q'lA1,LfY WINI! & SPIRI 000040 WINE PURCHASE
177.04
1';809 10/30/91 fNALFTY WIEJF A SPIRI 000040 LIQUOR PURCHASE
0.?11.111
0.1019.05
0, I111;1( IQIAI
1',450 1n/90/91 PAUSTIS & CON9 000103 WINF PURCHASE
210.00
1'951 10/70/`31 I:NN;':^,. COnPF,R & COM 000010 LIQUOR PURCHASF
3.433.11
I'r9YJ I A h 0/O1 FrGIF WIHI CCIMPANY 600012 WINF PURCHASE
41,47
IK992 IO/10!91 f55i1! VINE COMPANY 008012 MISC ITEM1 FOR RESAI,F. 117,09
`
100.81
*(IIFCK 101AL
CRC F11IANr 1 Al SYS; 1EM
10/31/91 16:35:02
WARRANT DATE VL NUOR
Oi9hUr-sem9nt Journal J
OESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM 1NVnt
I.EJUUk FUNO
15953 10/30/91 J MINSQN OROS WHOLESA 800022 WINE PURCHASE 546.26
15954 10/30/91 P11 E1.1. IPS 6 SONS CO/E 000037 WINE PURCHASE 1.373.88
15954 10/30/91 PHILLIPS h SONS CO/E 000037 LIQUOR PURCHASE 1.162.74
15954 10/30/91 PHII.I.IPS R SONS CO/E 800037 MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE 14.29
2.550.71 •C-HE.CV.. TOIAi
15955
10/)0/91
AMERICAN BUSINESS F
800013
CLOTHING - VESTS
221.23
15956
10/30/91
TRAVTLERS DIRECTORY
800007
ADVERTISING
161.00
15917
10/30/91
JOHNSON ATOS WHOI.ESA
800022
WINE PURCHASE
301.80
15958
10/30/91
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE• 25.24
15959
10/30/41
OVALITV WING & SPERI
800040
LIQUOR PURCILASF.
118.91
L JQUOR FDNO
TOTAL
28.900.05
J
`J
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/07/91
11:45:56
Olebursement
Journal
WARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLAIM INVO1
LIQUOR FUND
15900
11/08/91
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA
800001
POP PURCHASE
760.10
15961
11/08/91
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
900002
PHONE CHARGES
107.08
15962
11/09/91
CEDAR MAP COMPANY
800084
ADVERTISING
134.00
15963
11/08/91
CITY OF MONTICELLO
800003
SEWER AND WATER BILL
177.10
15964
11/08/91
COAST TO COAST
800006
BLD REPAIR SUPPLIES
29.56
15985
11/08/91
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUT
800009
BEER PURCHASE
17,376.41
15065
11/08/91
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUT
900009
JUICE PURCHASE
50.35
15965
11/00/91
DAIILHEIMER DISTRIBUT
100009
MISC OPERATING SUPPLIE
18.00
15965
11/08/91
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUT
800009
BEER PUMPS FOR RESALE
80.00
17,524.79
*CHECK TOTAL
15966
11/08/91
DAY OISTRIBUTING COM
900010
NUMBERS/MISC SUPPLIES
0.75
15980
11/08/91
DAY DISTRIBUTING COM
900010
MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE 33.80
15906
11/08/91
DAY DISTRIBUTING COM
900010
BEER PURCHASE
398.60
433. 15
*CHECK TOTAL
15067
11/09/91
DICK WHOLESALE CO.,
900011
BEER PURCHASE
1.529.00
15967
11/08/91
DICK WHOLESALE CO.,
900011
MISC SUPPLIES
64. g0
1.573.50
tCHECK TOTAL
,
15908
11/00/91
EARL F ANDERSON A AS
800120
LIQ STORE PARKING
SIGN 90.03
15969
11/00/91
GRIGGS. COOPER A COM
100010
LIQUOR PURCHASE
4,188.25
15970
11/00/91
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE 1100019
MISC SUPPLIES
25.15
15970
11/08/91
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I
100010
BEER PURCHASE
17,099.75
17.926.90
•CHECK TOTAL
15971
11/00/91
JOHNSON BROS KHOLESA,
100022
WINE PURCHASE
1,351.03
15972
11/00/91
JUDE CANDY 8 TOBACCO
100021
LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 84.10
15072
11/0e/01
JUDE CANDY A TOBACCO
100021
CIGARS, C1GS, ETC
217.01
15972
11/08/91
JUOE CANDY A TOBACCO
100021
BAGS A SUPPLIES
09.32
370.43
*CHECK TOTAL
15913
11/00/01
KRWr RADIO STATION
100026
ADVERTISING
60.00
15974
11/00/01
LIEFERT TRUCKING
100025
FREIGHT CHARGES
453.01
15975
11/D0/St
MAUS FOODS
100027
CLEANING SUPPLIES
7.45
15975
11/09/91
MAUS FOODS
100027
LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 12.91
20.43
*CHECK TOTAL
RRCFINANCIAL SVSTFM
11/07/91
11:45:56
Disbursement
Journal
WARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLAIM Ji
LIQUOR FUND
15976
1I/08/91
MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
900028
UTILITIES
49.43
15977
11/08/91
MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
800031
OFFICE SUPPLIES
68.88
15978
11/08/91
MONTICELLO TIMES
800032
ADVERTISING
238.55
15979
11/08/91
NORTHERN STATES POWE
600035
UTILITIES
671.07
15980
11/00/91
O'HARA BROS. COMPANI
600058
MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE
164.40
15981
11/00/91
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
WINE PURCHASE
27.75
15991
11/08/91
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
900037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
6.679.49
4.707.24
*CHECK TOFA1.
15902
11/08/91
RON'S ICE COMPANY
800041
ICE PURCHASE
354.54
15983
11/08/91
SEVEN-UP BOTTLING CO
8000h3
POP PURCHASE
132.60
15900
11/08/91
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
800065
CHAIR MAT FOR COMPUTER 33.00
15984
11/00/91
Sr. CLOUD RPSTAURANT
600045
JUICE FOR RESALE
118.54
19984
11/08/91
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
600065
MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE 480.10
811.84
*CHECK TOTAL
15985
11/00/81
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
800068
BEER PURCHASE
19.401.20
15086
11/08/91
TWIN CITIES FLAG SOU
800069
NEW FLAG
129.00
15087
11/00/91
VIKING COCA-COLA BOT
800051
POP PURCHASE
691.10
15900
11/00/91
WRIGHT WAY SHOPPER
800108
ADVERTISING
200.00
15999
11/08/91
TEE MEDICAL SERVICE
600056
LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 22.00
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
72.514.25
F
('RCFINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/14/91
16:06:21
Disbursement
Journal
�.
WARRANT
DATE -
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLAIM INV,
LIQUOR FUND
15990
11/14/91
BUSINESS RECORDS COR
800064
PRINTED CHECKS
138.63
151991
11/14/91
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
WINE PURCHASE
1,746.11
15991
11/14/91
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
BEER PURCHASE
44.30
15991
11/14/91
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE
50.45
1.840.88
'CHECK IOTA!
15992
11/14/91
GRIGGS, COOPER & COM
800018
LIQUOR PURCHASE
5,759.15
15993
11/14/91
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
3.791.70
15993
11/14/91
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
WINE PURCHASE
2.275.03
6.066.73
'CHECK TO1 AI
15994
11/14/91
MINN OEPARTMENT OF R
800006
OCTOBER SALES TAN
9.643.23
15995
11/14/91
OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
800036
REPAIR LIGHTS. ETC
154.08
15996
11/14/91
PAUSTIS & SON$
800103
WINE PURCHASE
80.00
15996
11/14/91
PAUSTIS & SONS
800103
BEER PURCHASE
21.95
101.95
•CHECK TOIA;
15997
11/14/01
PRIME FACTORS GROUP
800121
ADVERTISING
59.00
19998
11/14/91
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
800040
WINE PURCHASE
622.10
15090
11/14/91
QUALITY WINE R SPIRI
800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
4.117.13
,
15998
11/14/91
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
800040
MISC ITEMS FOR RESAI.E 54.50
U4,793.73
1CHECK 7O1A1
15090
11/14/91
U 9 WEST COMMUNICATI
800093
ADVERTISING
21.60
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
20.579.16
t
CITY Op MONTICELLO
MontAly Building Departsont Report
r{
y�
Month or OCTOBER
19_&
PERMITS NID USES
PERMITS ISSUED
Last This Same Month Last Year
This Year
"ontl$EPTEMBER Month OCTOBER Last Year To
Data
To Date
RESIDENTIAL
"-bar
10 12
IB
123
121
Valuation
9 292.000.00 9 431.200,00 9 214.000.00 9 2.084,200.00
92,214,400.00
Fee.
2.036.83 3,268.25
1.841.26
17.209.73
t6.995.89
Surcharge.
145.25 224.25
104.00
997.30
1,101.75
COMMERCIAL
"=bar
2 1
2
26
21
Valuation
490.000.00 873,900.00
19.500.00 2,744,300.00
1.580.000.00
Fees
3,415.05 5.216.27
326.95
16.104.36
10,836.37
Surcharges
245.00 436.98
9.50
1.399.40
788.03
INDUSTRIAL
Nu.ber
1 4
1
B
10
Valuation
31,800.00 250.300.00
22,400.00 2.858.300.00
401,800.00
Pao.
296.20 2.562.98
228.60
17,267.70
4,265.95
surcharges
15.90 125.15
11.20
1.429.15
200.90
PLUMBING
Number
5 B
4
39
35
Pa.■
145.00 187.00
77.00
1,076.00
856.00
Surcharges
2.50 4.00
2.00
19.50
17.50
OTNEIIS
Masher
1 2
1
7
5
Valuation
00.00 00.00
00.00
95,000.00
00.00
Fees
10.00 20.00
10.40
LIMBO
50.00
6ardu.gee
.50 1.00
.50
50.00
2.50
'
TOTAL NO. PERMITS
19 27
26
203
292
TOTAL VALUATION
$013,800,00 $1.555,400.00 $253.900.00 17.781.800.00
$4,196.200.00
TOTAL FEES
S Tn AA A 1jZSa _tin t
9_Aa1 71 �.j
%2-2&2 Al
a AT ImA 91
TOTAL SURCHARGES
$ 409.15 $ 781.48 $
127.20 7
3,895.35
t 21110.68
CURRFNT MONTIM
PFES
I
Nueber
to Unto
Pf7MMIT NATURE.
"-bar PERMIT #uRcllaRGs
Valuation
This year
]seat year
single Easily
7 93,193.23 8 211.85
6 423.700.00
28
26
duple$
t
0
Multi•Ta■lly
0
I
Comercial
1 5.216.27 436.98
873.900.00
1
6
Industrial
1 758.17 30.00
60.000.00
2
4
Res. Geragss
6
7
Sign.
0
0
Puhlio nulldlnUs
0
1
ALTI.RATION 00 REPAIR
Dwellings
3 75.00 2.50
7.500.00
64
72
Cwsurcial
20
20
Industrial
3 1.804.81 95.13
190.300.00
a
4
PMAstn11/0
All Types
8 187.00 4.00
33
39
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Relying Pools
1
2
11
Daoaa
21
16
`+
TEMPORARY PBRMIT
0
0
DEIOLITtOM
2 20.00 1.00
00.00
5
5
TOTALS
27 871.234.30 $781.48
$1.535.400.00
192
203
t
INDIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT
Month of nCTORPA . 19t.L
PERMIT
NUMBElI
DESCRIPTION
TYPE
NAML/IACATION
VALUATION►lE-
PERMIT
7URCYA1lGE PLUMRINC SURCHARGE
91-1761
Houae and Caraga pn1
S.P_
Wi111amMarrlyn Seefeldt/167 Jerry Llafart
r. 11107.600.01
7599,49
153.80
7 21.00 .50
91-1762
Footings i Foundation/B&n. School
C
Ind. School Dist.882/9350 Fallon Ave N.E.
873.900.00
3.161.38
436.98
91-1763
House and Garage Re -Roof
AD
Rose/Ethel Bryant/724 West River Street
1.500.00
15.00
.50
91-1764
Re -Roofing Existing Building Roof
At
Sunny Fresh Foods. Inc./206 W 4th Street
27,800.00
270,20
13.90
91-1765
House Re -Roof
AD
Laurence/Lucille Clausen/324 W Broadway
1,300.00
15.00
.50
91-1766
Hous• Re -Roof
AD
City of Monticello/1407 Hart Boulevard
1,500.00
I3.00
.SO
91-1767
Bou:• and Garage
S.F.
Value Plus Hon*/3120 Martin Drive
31,900.00
380.74
23.93
23.00 .50
91-1768
Building Remodel
At
Sunny Fresh Foods, Int./200 W 4th Street
122.300.00
718.23
51.25
91-1769
Demolish House
AD
Hillside Partnarshlp/502 Cedar Street
00.00
10.00
.50
91-1770
Reside Garage
AD
Clarance/Edith Lundborg/307 W River Street
1.500.00
15.00
.SO
91-1771
House and Caraga
S.F.
Value Plus Hous/5100 Martin Drive
51.700.00
379.93
25.63
23.00 .50
91-1772
House and Carage
S.F.
Value Plus Hous/5040 Marting Drive
51.900.00
380.74
25.95
23.00 .50
91-1773
Demolish House
AD
:icy of Monticello/213 Palm Street
00.00
10.00
.SO
91-1774
House and Garage
S.F.
Value Plus Hous/3010 Starling Drive
31,900.00
360.74
23.93
23.00 .50
91-1773
Warehouse Remodel
A2
9orthern States Pour/2807 Cty. Road 75
40.000.00
349.30
20.00
22.00 .30
91-1776
Carpeows Shop
1
7orthers States Powar/2801 Cty. Road 73
60.000.00
639.50
30.00
91-1777
House and Garage
I.P.
]slue Plus Hosea/3041 Martin Drive
51.900.00
390.74
25.95
23.00 .50
91-1778
House and Garage Reshingle
4.D.
Jerry Quigley/Sob West River Street
1,300.00
15.00
.50
91-1779
Nouse and Garage
B.F.
7alue Plus Hous/3043 Martin Drive
56.600.00
400.59
21.40
23.00 .SO
TOTALS
11.555.400.00
17,936.60
1711.45
7187.00 14.00
Fw REVIEW
91-1761
House and Carole
/.►.
villin/Nerrlyn Seefeldt/167 Jerry Ltefert
Ir. 7 39.93
91-1762
Footings and Foundation Only q
C
Ind. School Dist. 882/9330 Fallon Ave N.B.
2036,89
91-1767
Ibsen and Camp c Ol
S.F.
Value Plus Homes/5120 Martin Drive
30.07
91-1768
Building Remodel
At
Sunny fresh foods, Inc./200 West 4th Street
666.86
91-1771
House and Garage
I.F.
Value Plus Homaa/5100 Martin Drive
37.99
91-1772
House and Garage
I.F.
Value Plus Hou•/3040 Martin Drive
38.07
91-1774
[louse and Garage
S.F.
Value Plus Herne•/5010 Starling Drive
38.07
91-1776
Carpenter* Shop
I
Northern States Power/2601 County Road 73
298.67
91-1777
House and Garage
S.F.
Value Plus Nous/3061 Martin Drive
30.07
S.F.
value Flue Nous/5043 Martin Drive
40.06
TOTAL PLAN REVIEW
73.110.70
TOTAL REV ERU1
$12,033.91