City Council Agenda Packet 09-26-1994AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, September 26, 1994 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Brad Fyle
Councilmembers: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1994.
3. Consideration of adding additional agenda items.
4. Citizens commentstpetitions, requests, and complaints.
5. Consideration of appeal of Planning Commission denial of variance to the
front yard setback requirement. Applicant, General Rental.
6. Consideration of amendments to the official zoning map changing zoning
district designatione from a combination of R-1 and Agricultural to a
combination of R-1, R-2, B-3, and PZM zoning district designations.
Applicant, Robert Krautbauer, Rick Murray, Joe Abbot.
7. Consideration of an amendment to Chapter 13 of the�0fonticello Zoning
Ordinance which would establish restaurants, cafes, tea rooms, and off -sale
liquor as a conditional use in a B-3 zone if located within 300 R of a
residential district. Applicant, Monticello Planning Commission.
8. Consideration of approval of preliminary plat of the River Mill subdivision.
Applicant, Robert Krautbauer, Rick Murray, Joe Abbot.
9. Consideration of concept approval to utilize tax increment financing in
conjunction with reclamation of gravel pit and development of the River Mill
residential subdivision. Applicant, Rick Murray, Residential Development,
I nc.
10. Consideration of an offer on property in Oakwood Industrial Park 2nd
Addition - H -Window Company.
11. Consideration of renewal of contract with PSG, Inc., for operation of WWTP.
Agenda
City Council
September 26, 1994
Page 2
12. Consideration of proclamation. declaring October 17-25, 1994, as Monticello
Manufacturing Week.
13. Consideration of adopting a resolution proclaiming October 7, 1994, as Lynn
Smith Day.
14. Consideration of bills for the month of September, 1994.
15. Adjournment.
Items deleted from tentative agenda:
Consideration of final payment to Gridor Construction, Project 93-07.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, September 12, 1994 - 7 p.m.
Members Present: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Warren Smith, Dan
Blonigen
Members Absent: None
2. Consideration of adding additional agenda items.
A. Consideration of accepting an offer for the purchase of a lot owned by
the Citv within Oakwood Industrial Park 2nd Addition.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to add this item to
the agenda after item #7.
Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held August 22, 1994, and the
special meeting held September 6. 1994.
Councilmember Anderson requested that item #8 of the August 22 minutes
regarding award of contract for underground fuel tank removal and disposal
from the Gille site be amended to reflect that Anderson's motion was
amended by Clint Herbst.
Anderson also requested that paragraph three of the September 6 minutes
be amended to show that she agreed with Councilmember Smith that the
City's contribution to the School District for the community education
program ($17,600) helps pay for administration of recreation programs that
the City would have to provide at a higher cost otherwise.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Clint Herbst to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held August 22,
1994, and the special meeting held September 6, 1994, as amended. Motion
carried unanimously.
4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
None forthcoming.
5. deport from Community ,Arena, Orennization.
Dennis Taylor, member of the Community Arena Association, reported that
over the past 1 V2 years the association has raised between $88,000 and
$93,000 of the required $100,000. He asked Council if this amount was
sufficient to allow the referendum to be conducted or should they continue
efforts to raise funds. Mayor Fyle asked if they have met the other required
commitments.
Page 1 9
Council Minutes - 9/12/94
Assistant Administrator O Neill stated that the feasibility study detailing
site plan requirements, grading and drainage issues, and the final finance
plan was not completed as required by the City Council. Therefore, the
detailed information necessary to conduct a referendum is not available.
O'Neill went on to note that a referendum for this item cannot be on this
year's ballot but could either be on the ballot at the 1996 election, or a
special election could be held. Councilmember Anderson stated that she
preferred that the cost to conduct a special referendum be paid by the
Community Arena Association.
Shirley Anderson asked Taylor if the association had received a
commitment from Big Lake Township to help fund the arena. Taylor
responded they had not obtained a commitment on funding from Big Lake
but had received donations from individuals from that area. Anderson
suggested that the association try again to obtain a commitment from Big
Lake and Becker Townships.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council that additional discussion
is needed before a referendum on the community arena can be authorized:
however, such discussion should be delayed until after the new City Council
takes office. At that time, the association could present a new proposal to
Council for consideration.
Consideration of resolution to enter into special proiects agreement with
MN/DOT for Meadow Oaks outlet storm sewer.
City Engineer Bret Weiss reported that it is possible to obtain funding from
MN/DOT for the portion of storm water entering the Meadow Oak storm
sewer originating from the freeway system adjoining the Gene Bauer and
Meadow Oak property. Since the City will be bidding the Meadow Oak
storm sewer project in the spring of 1995, MN/DOT can consider our
request for funding if Council passes a resolution authorizing the City to
enter into a special projects agreement for such funding.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Warren Smith to adopt a resolution requesting a cooperative agreement
with MN/DOT for storm water drainage improvements on Interstate 94 in
accordance with the Meadow Oak storm water outlet project, 93-12C.
Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 94-30.
Con9ideration of amending minor and morainal acceAa/cul-do•sac street
width reauirernents.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the request to amend street
width requirements for minor and marginal accesa/cul-do-sac streets comes
from developers who believe that Monticello street width requirements are
extreme when compared to contemporary standards. O'Neill explained that
Page 2
Council Minutes - 9/12/94
a marginal access or cul-de-sac street serves a limited number of properties
and that a minor street is typically a street that serves numerous properties
within a residential area and provides a local "collector" function. The
minor street width requirement in Monticello is 36 ft. The marginal access
street width requirement is 32 ft. Research by the City Engineer's staff
shows that Monticello does require wide streets when compared to other
cities. Of the cities surveyed, 8% had 36 -ft wide minor streets and 2% were
greater than 36 ft. For marginal streets, 28% of those surveyed were at our
standard of 32 ft, with 6% greater than 32 ft and another 7% greater yet.
In his report, O Neill reviewed reasons to continue the present standard
such as safety, easier plowing, better maneuverability, additional area for
pedestrian movement, and availability of parking on both sides of the street.
He also outlined reasons in favor of narrower street widths such as a
limited need for off-street parking, creation of a neighborhood atmosphere,
likelihood of slower speeds, lower maintenance and replacement costs, less
run-off, and less environmental impact.
O'Neill went on to report that the Planning Commission reviewed the
matter at its September 6 meeting, and they felt that the reasons for
amending the street widths outweighed the reasons for maintaining the
existing requirement; therefore, Planning Commission favors amending the
ordinance as proposed. O'Neill added that as another alternative, the
variance process could be used to handle special circumstances that might
justify narrower road widths for a particular subdivision.
During discussion, Councilmembers noted that they favored the wider
streets because it is easier to see children, wider streets are safer, and it
affords a place for pedestrians in lieu of sidewalks. Allowing narrower
streets could result in the need for sidewalks, which places an unfair
expense to homeowners on the side chosen for placement of sidewalks.
Shirley Anderson stated that she supports the current ordinance.
John Simola, Public Works Director, noted that he also prefers wider
streets, and the added expense associated with sealcoating and overlaying is
minimal. Simola and the City Engineer noted that the right-of-way
requirement should be increased to from 50 ft 60 ft for marginal access
streets to provide sufficient area in the boulevard for placement of signs.
Jon Bogart, a current member of the Planning Commission, agreed with the
60 -ft right-of-way requirement but noted that he disagreed with
maintaining the wider street requirement. He pointed out that wider
streets promote children playing in the street, on -street parking, and higher
traffic speeds. In addition, the cost to plow wider streets is higher, and
eventually, in an effort to reduce pollution of lakes and streams, the PCA
will crack down on the water quality and amount of run-off from streets.
Page 3
Council Minutes - 9/12/94
The Mayor noted that he would not have a problem with alternative #3,
which would maintain the current ordinance, but Council would review all
proposed roads to determine which category each would fall under.
Councilmernber Herbst favored the idea of developers obtaining a variance,
provided that the street width is never less than 32 ft.
After discussion, a motion was made by Warren Smith and seconded by
Shirley Anderson to deny amendment of minor and marginal access/cul-de-
sac street width requirements, but approved an amendment of the right-of-
way width from 50 ft to 60 ft for marginal access roads. Motion carried
unanimously. SEE ORDINANCE ALMENDMENT NO. 255.
2A. Consideration of acceptine an offer for the purchase of a lot owned by the
Citv within Oakwood Industrial Park 2nd Addition.
City Administrator Wolfsteller reported that the City has received an offer
to purchase Lot 4 in the Oakwood Industrial Park 2nd Addition, consisting
of approximately 2.3 acres, in the amount of $36,000 from Miley Gjertsen,
who is interested in relocating his business from Rogers to Monticello.
Wolfsteller explained that since June 1991, the City has generally agreed to
hold Lots 1, 2, and 3 for possible future expansion of H -Window's complex,
and the City has granted a Right of First Refusal for Lots 4, 5, and 6. Even
though this agreement actually expired on January 31, 1994, Council may
still want to give H -Window the opportunity to purchase these parcels
before selling them to someone else. In addition to considering the offer of
$36,000, Council may also want to discuss what type of structure can be
constructed on the property. Metal buildings are allowed, but Council can
dictate a higher standard if desired.
It was the consensus of Council that a metal structure is acceptable on this
property.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Warren Srnith to accept the offer of $36,000 from Miley Gjertsen for Lot 4,
Oakwood Industrial Park 2nd Addition, and to give H -Window the Right of
First Refusal for 10 working days to expire Monday, September 26, 1994.
Anderson also noted that H -Window must commit at this time to any other
lots in the area that they wish to purchase since the Right of First Refusal
agreement is now expired. Mutton carried unanimously.
8. Consideration of ordinance amendment. adiustine Mnvor and Council
compensation.
Shirley Anderson stated that due to the fact that only two people have filed
for Council office at this time, she would like to release Dan Blonigen and
Warren Srnith from their oral commitment to her that they will not run for
office in this year's election.
Page 4
Council Minutes - 9/12/94
Administrator Wolfsteller noted that state statutes require any increase in
Mayor and Council compensation be done by ordinance amendment or
resolution prior to any municipal election, which in Monticello's case would
be prior to the general election in November. Wolfsteller noted that the
compensation rates have not changed for a number of years. He went on to
review a survey of a number of cities which showed that the Monticello
Mayor and Council compensation is lower than average. He noted that
there are a number of ways Council could increase the compensation such
as establishing a flat monthly amount, a monthly amount plus an additional
amount for each meeting, or any other method it chooses.
Mayor Fyle noted that Monticello is an active community, which would
justify an increase in the compensation. Dan Blonigen felt there should be
a bigger difference between the Mayor and Councilmember's compensation
since the Mayor's position is more time consuming.
After discussion, a motion was made by Dan Blonigen and seconded by
Warren Smith to increase the Mayor's compensation to $450 per month and
Council's compensation to $350 per month. Voting in favor: Dan Blonigen,
Warren Smith, Brad Fyle. Opposed: Clint Herbst, Shirley Anderson, as
they felt the increase was too high.
SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 256.
9. Consideration of observance of second annual Waste Reduction Week,
October 3.9. 1994.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Clint Herbst to declare October 3.9, 1994, as Waste Reduction Week, and
also to declare the month of October 1994 as Waste Reduction Month, which
authorizes Vasko to leave garbage containing recyclables at curbside during
Waste Reduction Week and one additional time during the month of
October. Motion carried unanimously.
10. Considerntion of purchasing emergency bypass pump for sanitary sewer
collection system.
John Simola reported that Matt Theisen, Water Superintendent, may have
received a verbal quote that is lower than what was listed in the agenda
supplement; therefore, the total for purchasing the necessary equipment
would be less than $3,500.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Dan
Blonigen to authorize purchase of the Flygt pump from Waldor Pump and to
purchase the necessary electrical components, hose, and fittings, for an
amount not to exceed $3,500. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 5
Council Minutes - 9/12/94
11. Consideration of final pavment to Veit for Gille house demolition.
After discussion, a motion was made by Dan Blonigen and seconded by
Warren Smith to authorize final payment to Veit & Company, Inc., in the
amount of $6,260.50 for demolition of the old Gille house. Motion carried
unanimously.
12. Consideration of final payment to Schluender Construction Companv for
Gille fuel tank removal and disposal.
After discussion, a motion was made by Warren Smith and seconded by Dan
Blonigen to authorize final payment to Schluender Construction in the
amount of $8,947 for removal and disposal of underground fuel tanks at the
old Gille site, contingent upon receipt of the necessary forms and
documentation. Motion carried unanimously.
13. Consideration of final payment to Northwest Mechanical on Project 93-11C,
chlorination/dechlorination aystem at the WWTP.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by
Shirley Anderson to authorize final payment to Northwest Mechanical in
the amount of $2,451.90 for the chlorination/dechlorination system at the
WWTP. Motion carried unanimously.
14. Consideration of final payment to Bituminous Consulting and Contracting
for Proiect 93.13C. Monticello Ford storm sewer.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Dan Blonigen to authorize final payment to Bituminous Consulting and
Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $2,105.19 for Project 93-13C, contingent
upon receipt of all lien waivers, release of liens, and applicable forms
required by contract. Motion carried unanimously.
15. Other matters.
A. Shirley Anderson reported that the manhole covers on Broadway are
very noisy when trucks drive over them and requested that they be
fixed. John Simola, Public Works Director, reported that this has
been discussed with the County, and the County did adjust the
manholes; however, staff will try to re -adjust the noisy one adjacent
to city hall.
B. Councilmember Anderson asked if the state had been contacted
regarding left turns on Broadway. John Simola reported that he had
not yet contacted the state but will review correspondence relating to
this request.
Page 6
Council Minutes - 9/12/94
C. Councilmember Anderson noted that a student was hit by a car near
the high school last week and asked if the state had been notified.
John Simola reported that the state is always notified of traffic
accidents.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to have the Public
Works Director ask the Wright County Deputies to more closely
patrol Highway 75 near the high school.
D. Councilmember Smith reported that he received a call from Mike
Carley of Kmart, who was concerned that due to his store design, he
will have difficulty in regulating sales as defined by the ordinance.
Smith noted that he has encouraged Carley to attend a Council
meeting to voice his concerns.
Administrator Wolfsteller noted that he also talked to Carley.
Wolfsteller suggested to Council that the City could adjust the
ordinance, as the intent was to rid easy accessibility to single pack
sales, not cartons as in Kmart's situation.
Mayor Fyle noted he had also received a complaint from Total Mart
regarding the tobacco ordinance.
No action was taken on this item at this time.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that a petition has been
received from Could Brothers Chevrolet and D & D Bus for sewer
service. This item will be on a future agenda for Council
consideration after further planning and consultation with the
Township.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Karen Doty
Office Manager
Page 7 a,
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
s• Consideration of anneal of Planning Commission denial of variance
to the front vard sedmk reauirement. Anollcant. General Mental.
(J .0. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
For the sake of efficiency, I am providing the information provided to the
Planning Commission on this item. In addition to the supplemental
material provided to the Planning Commission, I have inserted an
additional letter that the City received from a nearby property owner in
opposition to the variance request. Please note that the Planning
Commission voted to deny the variance request based on their finding that
no particular hardship or unique situation exists that warrants an
encroachment into the setback requirement.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the variance request.
Under this alternative, the City Council should point to a unique
circumstance or situation that warrants or justifies issuance of a
variance.
2. Motion to deny the variance request.
Under this alternative, the motion should be based on a finding that
a hardship or unique situation does not exist and that the property
owner can obtain reasonable use of his property without a variance.
This is the alternative selected by the Planning Commission.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
See Planning Commission agenda; Letter from Smith & Associates.
Planning Commission Agenda - 9/6/94 Or
r
Public Hearing—Consideration of a variance neauest which would
allow construction of a cold storage building addition within the
rear Yard setback. Aaalicant. Ron Chihos/General Rental. (J.0.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Ron Chihos, owner of General Rental, proposes to build a 50' x 56' cold
storage building on the Sandberg South side of the existing 40' x 60'
building. The setback necessary at this location is 30 ft. The plan proposes
a setback of 18 ft from the Sandberg Road right-of-way, which requires a
12 -ft variance. The point of the 12 -ft variance is located at the southwest
corner of the lot, which is adjacent to a curve in the right-of-way. The
extent of the variance decreases in the area outside of the curve.
As with every variance request, the Planning Commission needs to
determine whether or not a hardship or unique situation exists that justifies
granting of the variance. Are there any site specific conditions that exist
that would limit reasonable use of the property without the variance? In
this situation, it is very difficult to see a particular hardship or unique
situation that would set this development apart from other developments.
Granting a variance in this situation would set a precedent that would
result in a reduction in the city setback requirements.
As an additional note, General Rental is operating under a conditional use
permit obtained in September of 1990. The business operation is currently
in violation of the permit obtained at that time due to the fact that they
have never paved a portion of the parking lot, and a portion of the required
landscape plantings have not survived.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Motion to deny the variance request based on the finding that no
hardship or unique situation exists that would justify granting of the
variance, the property owner can obtain reasonable use of the
property while staying within the guidelines of the ordinance, and to
set a variance in this case would impair the intent of the ordinance.
Motion to grant the variance based on the finding that a unique
hardship or situation exists that limits reasonable use of the property
without the variance.
The property owner has the option of reducing the size of the building
under this alternative.
Planning Commission Agenda - 9/6/94
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Unless the property owner can explain what unique situation or hardship
exists that justifies the variance, then City staff recommends denial of the
variance.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of application materials; Council minutes and plan information from
conditional use permit application of September 10, 1990.
0
Iq
�r
O
N
lulif
Cencrefe Curb
n
(fie i -r C t
„dbe+<
M GG'fror� rt °F
! ;'praPore(p'
i
.5O Xs(o
X st't J
qO X �¢
5't from Snyrrtb2Jg�d
ev
1
PR o Pos10rf�Pr-?Ns1 aM OF
6CNCIgA L RTF-1L CENTER
Bf�n/9J/
0
To03a
Council Minutes - 9 /10/90
4. Consideration of a conditional use request to allow expansion
of an outdoor rental use in a B-3 (hiohwav business) zone.
Applicant, General Rental.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the conditional use
request which would allow expansion of the existing General
Rental store site. The proposed expansion is an expansion of
land area only and calls for General Rental acquisition of a
strip of land 20 feet wide and 207 feet long running along the
northern perimeter of the property. O'Neill informed Council
that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
permit and went on to outline recommended conditions.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Dan Blonigen, to approve the conditional use
permit allowing expansion of an outdoor rental use in a B-3
(highway business) zone subject to the following conditions:
1. outside services, sales, and equipment rental
connected with the principal uses is limited to
forty (40) percent of the gross floor area of the
principal use. This percentage may be increased as
a condition of the conditional use permit.
2. outside sales areas are fenced or screened from
view of neighboring residential uses or abutting
"R" District in compliance with Chapter 3,
Section 2 (G), of this ordinance.
3. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that
the light source shall not be visible from the
public right-of-way or from neighboring residences
and shall be in compliance with Chapter 3,
Section 2 (H), of this ordinance.
4. Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust.
5. The display or sales area shall not take up parking
spaces required for conformity to this ordinance.
6. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are
considered and satisfactorily met.
7. Rental items for display may not be placed in the
Highway 25 right-of-way or within S feet of the
Highway 25/property boundary line.
9. Bituminous surface and curb shall be installed
along the eastern boundary of the parking area up
to the 5 -foot setback line. All outside display of
goods shall be confined to bituminous. surface
areas.
9. A minimum of five overstory trees shall be planted r
along the northern perimeter of the property.
Z`
Q11
.•s t %e
O
n_
� M1- � _ _ �
LawK grta-s•
cx
co
Q
1
v I �
1 1 EK .7 grtQ%
�
��Q^
1 8•YG�nJ•d b..
/
l
S wo.d F'e�c Er;s7;n
N
�+
StOX(o0
� B►d9
C. 'b
N �
IT-
I -
- .
..v •a b.i .i.. •"J•• .{I C •`•
�-� .��� p•b s �D ••. �'x �p���ys is ...�� �
-ttiYi. - -It.� :T'i?
'.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
Notice Is hereby given that public hearings will be held by the City of
Monticello Planning Commission on September 6 , 19 94 , at
7 p.m. in the Monticello City Hall to consider the following matters:
PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a variance request to allow construction
of a cold storage building addition within the rear yard
setback requirement. Location is Block 1 , Part of Lot a,
Sandberg South Addition in the city of Monticello.
APPLICANT: Ron Chihoa/General Rental
Written and oral testimony will be accepted on above subjects, and all
persona desiring to be heard on referenced subjects will be heard at
this meeting.
NOTE: Decisions of the Planning Commission will be final unless
appealed by any Individual by 9 a.m. on Wednesday,
2d2tAW <r 7 , 19 94 . Appeals must be in writing , signed, and
must state reasons Lor appeal. If appeal Is filed, the City
Council shall hear appeal on Monday, aanteLftr 17 , 1994 ,
at 7 p.m. at the Monticello City Hall. Notice of any appear --
shall appear In the Monticello Times on Thursday, saotember e
19 94 J
Garry Anderson V lonnig wdministrator
�. 1 y
of a cold storage building
addition within the rear yard
setback requirement.
APPLICANT: Ron Chihos/General
Rental
G14 W4,,
PL
3f
4
Phare I6121 295541x1 U J C E,tandwm
Southside Dental Center
201 Sandberg Road
Monticello. Minnesota 55362
To: City of Monticello 02SEPT94
From: Southside Dental Center
Dr. J.C. Erl andson
201 Sandberg Road
Monticello Mn 55362
Subj: Variance request from General Rental For Setbacks for Cold Starage
Building.
I do not feel that these variances should be allowed. I feel should the
variances be allowed it would detract from the appearance of the area, thus
affecting and decreasing the adjoining and also the area property values. The
city codes are there for a reason and should be adhered to. A peraanant stuctural
variance should not be allowed. There is an abundance of property available in
the area that could be purchased to allow for proper setbacks or the building
site could be adjusted to conform to code. Other city codesshould also be enforced
for good appearance as this is a very vise ble site to those arriving into Monticello
northbound on Highway 25 and should help LO set a good example for the whole city.
Dl.,�J/�C. Er�lend1eo�n
ii(9L,}I�" lands
0
c—,".
MONTICELLOOrrICE
207 SOUTH WALNUT STREET
P o Box 664
MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA 55362-0660
OrrlcE H.H.Pi-1 ..1-01
M tTAO PHOHt 16121 A21-630
September 2, 1994
City of Monticello
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
GREGORY V SMITH & ASSOCIATES
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
GREGORY Y SMITH
GARY PRINGLE 11940-19BT,
RICHARD D CLOUGH
SCOTT 5 WHITE
MARY n. BERGER
BARBARA! 5CHERBING
LEGAL ASSISTANT
[ ACHE' TO
ELK A1YEA OrrICC
CINEMA PROFESSIONAL BLDG
657 MAIN ST . SUITE 103
ELK RIVER. MINNESOTA 55330
p rr10E n»OHC e 121 A• 1 ]9tp
GA, 16121 AA I-]179
RE: Ron Chihos/General Rental - Request for Variance
Dear Members of the Planning Commission
and City Council:
We are partners in Central Minnesota Projections which owns the land adjoining
to the North and across Sandberg Road from the existing General Rental.
Central Minnesota Projections opposes any variance or conditional use permit
which would permit further expansion of the business beyond its present land
capacity.
The business was originally located there by the splitting of one lot in
Sandberg South. Thereafter, when trucks and equipment were being parked on
our property, we sold a portion of Lot 3 to General Rental. We now are
experiencing further encroachment by trucks within the setback overhanging our
lot.
There comes a time when the growth of a business necessitates relocation or
the acquisition of additional land, particularly when the proposed future
expansion will undoubtedly result in an impairment of the marketability and
perhaps market value of surrounding land.
We trust you will consider the negative impact further expansion of General
Rental may have upon the neighboring property owners, including the
professional installations of Buffalo Clinic and Southside Dental Clinic.
Yours truly, 1
CENl MINNES TA PROJECTIONS
I
Smith.. Partner
GVS/bjs
/
- A -k --
James P. Foster, Partner
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
6. Consideration of amendments to the official zoning man chancing
zoning district deli¢nations from a combination of R-1 and
Acricultural to a combination of R-1. R-2. B-3. and PZM zoning
district designations. AND y
7. Consideration of an amendment to Chanter 13 which would
establish restaurants. cafes. tea rooms. taverns. and off -sale liouor
as a conditional use in a B-3 zone if located within 300 ft of a
residential district. AND
e. Consideration of a oreliminary plat encomoassine the Robert
Krautbauer nrooerty (River Mill plat). Annlicant. Richard Murray.
(J.O.) r) w )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The three items requested for consideration are proposed in conjunction
with the proposed development of the River Mill subdivision. Please review
the attached preliminary plat booklet which thoroughly describes the
project. In order for the project to proceed as proposed, certain zoning text
and map amendments are needed. PLEASE REVIEW THE BOOKLET
BEFORE PROCEEDING.
The proposed text amendments to Chapter 13 of the zoning ordinance call
for modifying the ordinance by adding a provision that allows restaurants/
taverns as a conditional use in a B-3 district if located within 300 fl of a
residential district. Currently, restaurants in the B-3 zone are allowed as
permitted uses. This would not change for restaurants/taverns located more
than 300 ft from a residential district. The basic reason for the amendment
is to provide additional site control over Hawks Bar when it is annexed to
the city under the B-3 zoning district designation.
The zoning designation plan for the area calls for placing Hawks liar in a
11-3 zone. A small PZM zone is also proposed around the perimeter of the
11-3 zone. The area generally between the proposed access point to CSAH
75 extending along the high side of the bluff is proposed to be designated for
R-2 zoning, which would allow two-family homes in this area. The balance
of the property is proposed to he designated for R -I uses. According to the
City Planner, the transition of land uses as proposed in conjunction with the
plat design makes sense and is acceptable.
2
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
Following list of specific items and issues that will need to be addressed
by the Council prior to adoption of the plat.
1. Access to CSAH 75
The plan calls for development of an access point located on CSAH
75. According to the traffic study, projected increases in traffic will
create the need to install a stop light or limit traffic movement to
right -in, right -out through installation of a median on CSAR 75.
It is also projected that the future Hart Boulevard "service drive" will
be extended to the site from the west, thus providing a second access
to the site. The goal would be to time Hart Boulevard construction to
coincide with installation of the CSAH 75 median. Property owners
purchasing the commercial sites would be put on notice of the
potential loss of full traffic movement at the intersection via recording
of the development agreement against each developed lot.
2. Roadwav Width
As a result of the discussion at the previous Council meeting, the
developer has adjusted roadway widths accordingly.
3. Sanitary Sewer/EAW Threshold
According to the City Engineer, an environmental assessment
worksheet (EAW) is not needed.
4. Park Development
The Parks Commission met to review the proposed park dedication in
conjunction with the site on two occasions. It is the recommendation
of the Parks Commission that the park proposed be modified to
include the four lots located on the northern boundary of the park.
Following is an excerpt from the Parks Commission meeting minutes.
Roger Mack, Street/Park Superintendent, and Assistant
Administrator Jeff O'Neill described the changes made to the
River Mill plat since the previous meeting. It was noted that
the Planning Commission approved the preliminary plat with a
park area as proposed by the developer.
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
Mack noted that the park design proposed by the developer will
not achieve the goals for the area as identified on August 3,
1994, by the Parks Commission. Mack outlined a proposal to
improve the park by eliminating four residential lots on the
northern boundary of the park. Removal of the four lots is
desired because it will reduce the level of isolation from the
public right-of-way and, therefore, reduce the sense that the
park is private. Removing the lots and grading the site
accordingly will also provide additional land area necessary to
construct a ballfield in addition to the football/soccer area.
Under the original proposal, the steep slopes provide an
opportunity for development of a sliding gill but take up too
much of the park area. It is, therefore, also recommended that
sloped areas on the southeast side of the park be removed from
the park area and attached to the adjoining lots.
After discussion, it was the consensus of the Parks Commission
that the park plan does not achieve the spirit of the park
dedication requirement because too much of the area dedicated
is unusable due to steep slopes, and access to the public street
is insufficient. Furthermore, the development area must
provide sufficient area for active recreation, and the flat area
proposed is simply too small to satisfy needs.
Therefore, a motion was made by Larry Nolan and seconded by
Bruce Thielen to request that the park plan be modified by
extending the park to the north all the way to the right-of-way.
Furthermore, with the exception of the area needed for the
trail, sloped areas proposed along the southeast side should be
removed from the park area and transferred to the adjoining
properties. (See map for detail.)
5. Storm Water/Grading Issues
See attached comments from the City Engineer.
Due to the expense associated with the site grading, the developer is
requesting that the City establish a tax increment financing soils
correction district. A tax increment financing soils correction district
is a funding system that is used by titres to finance correction of soil
conditions when the estimated cost of which exceeds the fair market
value of the land before completion of such preparation. See the next
agenda item for details.
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
A Glorious Church
The developers have met with A Glorious Church officials and have
agreed to a land exchange which would allow better utilization of the
land, thereby enhancing the church property and the development
property.
Lot Desien Variance
The cul-de-sac near the A Glorious Church site reveals a lot that does
not meet city minimums with regard to street frontage. In order to
make full use of the land, the developer has requested a variance to
the ordinance which would allow a parcel with a width less than 56 ft
at the property/right-of-way boundary line. Formal consideration of
the variance is not possible at this time because the request has not
been processed through the Planning Commission.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to approve proposed zoning district designations, text
amendments, and preliminary plat. Approval of the final plat is
contingent on obtaining a lot width variance (Lot 7, Block 1) and
contingent on verification of project feasibility by the City Engineer.
Motion to approve zoning district designations and text amendments
should be based on a finding relating to consistency with the
comprehensive plan and consistency with the geography and
character of the areas affected. Also, consider the need for the uses
and whether or not the amendments will result in a depreciation in
adjoining land values. The motion should include a reference to the
park design. Is it acceptable as is or should the Parks Commission
recommendation be adopted by Council?
Under this alternative, the plan will be submitted to the Township
for review. Final approval via the approval of the final plat and
annexation will occur at a subsequent meeting after Township review.
This process is consistent with the City/Township annexation
agreement.
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
2. Motion to deny approval of the proposed zoning district designations,
text amendments, and preliminary plat.
Motion to deny zoning district designations and text amendments
should be based on a finding relating to consistency with the
comprehensive plan and consistency with the geography and
character of the areas affected. Also, consider the need for the uses
and whether or not the amendments will result in a depreciation in
adjoining land values.
3. Motion to table approval of the proposed zoning district designations,
text amendments, and preliminary plat.
Council may wish to table approval if issues arise that need further
study.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat. Staff concurs with the
Parks Commission that the park could be improved by extending it through
the residential lots to the roadway. Doing so would provide needed flat area
and ample access to the public right-of-way, thereby reducing the private
nature of the park. On the other hand, the developer argues that the
expense associated with developing the park frontage is high at $75/foot.
The added cost to have an additional 360 ft of park frontage costs
appro)dmately $26,000, which to him is high relative to the added benefit to
park usability; therefore, he is requesting that the park plan remain as is.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
River Mill booklet, which includes proposed zoning district designations;
Copy of Planning Commission agenda supplement from 6/7/94; Proposed
zoning ordinance text amendments; Proposed Parks Commission park plan;
Proposed developer park plan.
00�
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/7/94
8. Review proposed land use Dian for development of the property
formerly owned by Robert Krautbauer and consider authorizing
public hearings for associated zoning ordinance amendments. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND 13ACKGROUND
City staff has been informed by Bob and Rick Murray of Residential
Development Inc. out of Chanhassen, Minnesota, that they have purchased
the Krautbauer property for the purpose of development of commercial,
townhome, and single family uses. The goal of the discussion scheduled for
June 7 is to review the land use configuration as proposed and provide
guidance to the developers as they begin the process of further defining the
preliminary plat. Following are some of the issues that the Planning
Commission will need to address.
HAWKS BARIRESTAURANT
Planning Commission needs to determine whether or not to establish
Hawks Bar as a conformine or non-conformine use. The applicant is
proposing that Hawks Bar be annexed to the city as a conforming use. He
plans on mitigating the negative impact of a bar/restaurant facility on the
residential area through development of a small commercial area between
the bar and the future residential arca. In addition, roadway access to this
commercial area and to the bar would be separated from the residential
area. The developer's plans at this point are very conceptual and require
Planning Commission input before the plans can be refined.
It should be noted that under our existing ordinance, in order for Hawks
Bar to he brought into the city as u conforming use, it must be brought in
under a 13-9 zoning district designation. The problem with this designation
is that it creates a 13-3 island or "spot zone" surrounded by PZM and
residential zoning designations. As you will note on the zoning map, the 16
acres of land owned by Gladys Hoglund to the west of the Hawks Bar site is
currently zoned W.M. A possible alternative for Hawks Bar to be brought
into the city under conforming status would be to extend the PIM zone
easterly to include the Hawks Bar site and then introduce a zoning
ordinance text amendment that would allow for restaurants/bars in a PZM
zone.
The concept of simply extending the PZM zone and making an adjustment
to the ordinance text has some merit. According to Steve Grittman, the
PZM zone is a commercial/residential area. Restaurant uses are commonly
found in areas where commercial activity occurs. It would appear to be
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/7/94
consistent to allow restaurants in a PZM zone as long as sufficient
conditions and design standards are in place to protect residential uses from
restaurant and bar uses.
DEVELOPMENT SITE
The proposal as described to me by Rick Murray will call for a very small
area of commercial development, which would allow for development of a
daycare and perhaps a convenience store adjacent to Hawks Bar. It is
proposed that townhomes be developed on the upper level of the property
east of Hawks Bar. The lower level of the property is earmarked for single
family homes. According to the comprehensive plan, the entire area is
earmarked for single family homes. Planning Commission needs to
determine if the proposal for commercial/townhomes/single family is
consistent or at odds with the onliprehensive plan.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to authorize necessary zoning text amendments or zoning map
amendments in conjunction with land use configuration presented by
developer.
Under this alternative, a public hearing would be called for the
purpose of reviewing possible zoning map or text amendments in
conjunction with development of the Murray property and annexation.
of Hawks Bar. The nature of the text amendments is to be
established as a result of discussion.
2. Motion to deny request for text or zoning map amendments affecting
properties outside of the development site.
Under this alternative, the Planning Commission views Hawks Bar
as a non -conforming use that should ultimately he converted to R-1
uses. This alternative is simi lar to what occurred when the West
Side Market property was annexed to the city.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is our view that Hawks Bar should be incorporated as a conforming use
into the future land use pattern for the area. Hawks is a viable commercial
enterprise located along o busy highway. It appears reasonable to allow the
long-term land use pattern to he effected by the presence of Hawks Bar.
Therefore, it should he a goal of the City to attempt to bring Hawks into the
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/7/94
city as a conforming use but in a fashion that enables proper transition
from the restaurant/bar use to residential uses to the east. We are
somewhat unsure as to the proper approach to use in bringing Hawks Bar
into the city as a conforming use. Staff is looking to the Planning
Commission for input in determining whether or not to simply zone Hawks
Bar as a B-3 use and extend the B-3 district into the Hoglund site to the
west, or should the PZM district be extended into the Hawks Bar area
followed by a text amendment that would add restaurant bar to the list of
conditional uses in the PZM zone.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of area map; Report provided by City Planner. Additional information
provided by the developer at the meeting.
pro
��..•.,.
• �• � Single Fa,nily,,'i:, _ 1
0 Multiple .Family'�Tt`
I�
EM
Commercial
- I
® ;,-Industrial
Public /Quasi -Public,•;,,-
1 .
❑ Proposed Park
36 31 r ' 1 32
i
Irl. DEVELOPMENT AREA
��(Illlllllpu : ,..
Figure a
r
i f
C-1kc. zoo,., Mep
CLIC. 54:4�a 51; L l dv a +o
crrea 1,%f"U
ea
N
71
144
a ���•• I A Glorious Y _
Chur
a • Huglund
rop prop I �_•'•
• Murray Single Famil,, Housing
?
(16 acre Y 8 8
ilturray'- To omen '
Fz
I
WS
J;;IN-03-1994 11:59 WC 612 595 SEC? P.01iO4
r��lNA Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
`j U AS AN PLANNING • 090 I O N • MARKET RKSCARCH
MEMOBAMUM
TO:
Jeff O'Neill
PRION:
Stephen Grittman
DATE:
3 June 1994
RE:
Monticello . Nurray Development
PILE N0:
192.0 - 94.0
This memorandum is intended to highlight issues which may help
guide the Planning Commission's discuseion of the concept review on
the arautbauer property. It is important to note that the purpose
of a concept review is not to preent the City's public hearing and
review procene, but rather gives the developer the opportunity to
get the Planning Commission's perspective and concerns up front.
in this way, the developer can design a project for more formal
review which should be able to address some basic issues,
ultimately allowing the project to proceed more efficiently and
with more attention to detail.
Therefore, the Plaaning Commission's responsibility in a concept
review is not to be concerned with Specific lot sizes or other
detailed perfo=ance standards, unless the developer is asking for
an alteration of those standards. Instead, the best use of concept
review is to address the larger issues such as land use patterns,
Comprehensive Plan and Policy consistency, general tra,naportation
and circulation, and to establish parameters for the City's further
consideration of development on the property in question.
Land Un
The proposed project consists of four general land uses: single
family residential, two family residential, park land, and
commercial. The commercial area in proposed to be located around
the Eawk's sar property in an effort to buffer the impacts of the
bar from the remaindor of the development. The planning Commission
should talk about the nature of the commercial une in this
location, including the amount and intensity of the area. As we
5775 Wayzata Blvd - Suite 555 - St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595 -9636 -Fax. 595-9837
6
JIRD -03-1994 12:00 NRC 612 595 9837 P.62/04
have discussed, a part of this discussion may be the long-term
viability of Hawk's ear in this location. Our feeling is that this
is not an incompatible situation, as long as surrounding land uses
are designed with the bar's situation in mind.
A sub -issue related to the Hawk's Har site is how the City will
zone the commercial area to accommodate the bar, and other
commercial uses. We have discussed amemglmg the PZM zone to allow
bare and restaurants by Conditional Use Permit. An alternative
would be to zone the site to a commercial designation which allows
these uses now. We believe that bare and restaurants are
compatible with other PZM uses, with the controls available through
the Conditional Use process, and Comprehensive Plan guidelines
which limit those sites which may not be compatible. The Planning
Commission should discuss this process as well.
A further sub -issue is the zoning and use of the property to the
west of the subject property. i believe that it is zoned PZK. and
designated for residential in the Comprehensive Plan's Proposed
Land Use Plan. The decisions on the Rrautbauer property should be
analyzed as to how they impact the land use and servicing of the
adjacent properties, particularly with regard to circulation. This
discussion should be carried on about properties to the east as
well.
The park land aspect of the development is apparently located in
ouch a way to utilize an area of fill which is not compatible with
building construction. The primary issue in this category relates
to trail access and location, since the park will serve a large
area for both neighborhood and community recreation.
The single family land is proposed to comprise the north and east
portions of the property, buffered somewhat from the commercial
area and the freeway interchange by the grades on the property and
the two family development. The single family area would require
2-1 zoning, and the two family area R-2 zoning. Both of the
residential areae would be considered low density residential,
consistent with the land use plan for the parcel.
GYnealadm
The property is divided by a steep wooded bluff which runs east -
west through the parcel. Single family development is located to
the east, the Mississippi River is situated across County 39 to the
north, A Glorious Church is proposing to develop its facility on
the northwest quadrant of this property, and a larger undeveloped
parcel lies wast of the property and Hawk's Bar. The undeveloped
land suns to the intersection of County 39 and County 79.
The circulation on site includes two aacosses from County 39 and
one from County 75. A proposed street would serve single family
lots on the eget portion of the property, and would eventually be
JW --e3-1594 1200 NRC 612 595 9837 P. 03/04
extended to the adjacent property. More internal street
connections would be preferable to disperse locally generated
traffic, however, the topography of the site does not permit it.
As such, the higher intensity uses along County 75 make sense in
that they are generally less sensitive to higher traffic volumes.
The Planning C—fission should discuss the potential of extending
the westernmcet street to the undsvelopad property. Without such
an extension, both parcels become more isolated. The additional
street connections would serve to disperse traffic more broadly
throughout the area. However, the City will have to be aware of
the land use impacts such a connection would have.
The land use pattern for the Murray project appears to be
acceptable considering the existing land uses and the needs of the
transportation system through the slope. The Planning Commiasion
should approach the concept review from the perspective of giving
the developer guidance as more formal plans aro prepared. A6 we
have noted above, this should result in a better and more
efficiently haadled project as it proceeds further.
r r�w•�^<� wr.
I
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN THAT TITLE 10, CHAPTER 13, SECTION 2 [E], OF THE
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO PERM[ TIED
USES IN A B-3 ZONE BE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
[E] Restaurants, cafes, tea rooms, taverns, and off sale liquor provided
that the use is not located within 300 R of a residential zone.
THE CITY COUNCIL. DOES HEREBY ALSO ORDAIN THAT TITLE 10,
CHAPTER 13, SECTION 4, OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE
PERTAINING TO CONDITIONAL USES IN A B-3 ZONE BE AMENDED BY
ADDING TSE FOLLOWING:
[Q] Restaurants, cafes, tea rooms, taverns, and off We liquor located
within 300 ft of a residential zone provided that:
Primary access must not be through residential street(s).
Adopted this 26th day of September, 1994.
Mayor
City Administrator
6-g
PARRS COMMISSION RESOLUTION 1991-1
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DEVELOPMENT
OF PARR SPACE UNENCUMBERED BY
POWER LINES AND P0OR PUBLIC ACCESS
WHEREAS, the Parks Commission has been duly appointed by the City
Council to review and comment on parks facilities issues, and
WHEREAS, the Parks Commission has reviewed all existing park
facilities in the city of Monticello, and
WHEREAS, the Parks Commission has noted that existing parks
developed under power lines are not fully developable for park
purpcses, as trees, overhead lighting, and park structures are not
allowed under power lines, and
WHEREAS, parks under power lines are limited in terms of the type
of park activities that may be conducted, and
WHEREAS, parks under power lines do not create a pleasing
recreational environment which results in under -utilization by the
public they are intended to service, and
WHEREAS, parks located in residential areas without sufficient
public access create park user/nelgpbor conflicts, and
WHEREAS, development of usable recreation space is a need in a
growing community.
THE PARRS COMMISSION HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the Planning Commission
and City Council deny approval of any preliminary or final plat
that includes development of park land that is under power lines or
bounded on more than two sides by residences.
Adopted this 17th day of July, 1991.
L4
Kut Chairperson
Fgtic 5uperinttrndont
Re'va4 /Ki l X Qiwt Does Aot (AvO Ike
�►i�t:t of tiNis IN -so 11Aflow
�'c"�t �l ,•1 t" =?S r"'°°as"caM+ap--- Is i, �e i '12 .
o
21
38
a � `\'�i1Qr f l ^aR /' �; l _' �•-''�'c'y"";, r � � i
Council Agenda - 9126/94
Consideration of concept approval to utilize tax increment
financing in coniunction with reclamation of gravel nit and
develooment of the River Mill residential subdivision. Applicant.
Rick Murray. Residential Development. Inc.. (R.W.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
In conjunction with the River Mill residential preliminary plat approval, the
Council is being asked to consider providing conceptual approval for the use
of tax increment financing to assist in the soil correction cost for a
reclamation of the gravel pit area within the River Mill plat. Residential
Development, Inc., the developer of the Krautbauer parcel, has put together
engineering data that they feel indicates the grading for correcting the soils
conditions within the gravel pit area will cost an extra $132,000. They have
been requesting assistance through the HRA and City in the form of tax
increment financing help to cover some of these extra costs associated with
their development.
According to projections supplied by the developer, they expect to build 58
homes and 84 townhouses by 1998, which would generate over $152,000 in
tax increments within the first two years of the development, more than
enough to cover any assistance requested. Although these projections may
be optimistic, the requested tax increment assistance would he a pay-as-you-
go pian whereby any payments to the developer would only occur if the
homes are actually built. Although the City would be allowed under a soil
correction district to extend the length of the district to 12 years, it is
anticipated that the district would be decertified after sufficient increment
is generated to cover the assistance to the developer estimated at $102,000
and any additional increment use for administrative overhead. The
$102,000 figure is arrived at by noting that the previous landowner
(Krauthauer) has agreed to lower his price of the land by $30,000 to cover
some of the general grading cost in the gravel pit area.
After reviewing the concept at previous meetings, the NRA preliminarily
granted approval to the concept of using tax increment financing assistance
for this residential development, as they did feel that assistance may he
necessary to eliminate a blight and to correct the safety problem that may
exist with the present gravel pit area. Their concept approval was based on
the developer's figures, which indicated a $102,000 shortfall, which is the
amount the HRR recommended he provided through tax increment.
Before the developer proceeds with a final plat, they have requested
conceptual approval from the Council for use of tax increment financing.
The Council may want to consider the following list of pro's and con's
regarding the use of tax increment financing for this particular project.
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
Reasons for Su000rtine TIF Use:
1. Because the extra cost associated with the gravel pit grading may
exceed the value of the lots graded in today's market.
2. Development of the gravel pit area would correct an apparent unsafe
condition that currently exists and would eliminate a blighted area
that may not be developed otherwise.
3. TIF revenue may ensure that both areas (township property and city
property) are developed in unity, maximizing the use of all 72 -acre
parcel.
4. The financial risk to the City under the proposed financing plan is
relatively low, as the River Mill project does not require any upfront
City financing for the public utilities. In addition, the TIF pay-as-
you-go funding program used to correct the gravel pit would, likewise,
not require any direct funding from the City but would only be
reimbursed to the developer as the homes are constructed.
5. The proposed development takes advantage of the City's considerable
investment in utilities along County Road 39 and could provide the
City with the opportunity to require payment of the $1,250 per acre
trunk sewer access charge for the 35 -acre township parcel that is part
of this development.
Reasons for Not Suouortine Use of TIF Are:
1. May set a precedent by providing assistance to a residential developer
when it hasn't been used in other developments.
2. TIF assistance may actually be rewarding the original landowner who
allowed the mining of the gravel pit for profit with TIF assistance
now being used to rectify the problem.
3. Because of changes in tax increment laws, tax increment assistance
to the developer will result in a loss of City HACA aid equal to
approximately 25% of any assistance given the developer. In other
words, if the developer was given $102,000 in tax increment
assistance as proposed by the HRA, the general fund of the City will
lose an anticipated $25,000 in net aid.
It is obvious that the grading expenses for this project are high relative to
other projects; however, we are operating on the word of the developer that
the project will not proceed without tax increment assistance.
Unfortunately, staff has not done an exhaustive analysis of the figures to
Council Agenda - 9/26794
demonstrate that a true financing gap exists that justifies the requested use
of TIF, and the Council may want to see additional research on these
calculations.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. A motion to approve the preliminary concept for use of TIF (soils
condition district) to assist with the development of this residential
project as recommended by the HRA in the amount of $102,000.
Under this alternative, the Council would recognize that the City may
be penalized up to 35% of the amount given to the developer.
2. Council could deny preliminary, approval of the concept for use of TIF.
3. Council could delay any action on the concept of TIF for the purpose
of gathering more information to substantiate the need for the
proposed assistance.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff does not have a firm recommendation, as 1 believe each individual
has a different opinion on the validity of the tax increment use for this
project. If we truly believe that the gravel pit is a detriment to the
Krautbauer property and that no one can develop this property without
some sort of assistance, then we recommend that the pay-as-you-go
assistance be provided to encourage the development to take place and
reclaim the gravel pit area. One can also question why the City is being
asked to provide assistance which may enrich the landowner who created
the gravel pit in the first place and why the owner isn't required to restore
the property as part of their original conditional use permit from Wright
County. If you feel that in the next few years the development pressures
push up the value of the land to the point where an extra $100,000 in
grading costs can be absorbed by the Iota, it may he appropriate to deny the
use of tax increment financing. Because of the TIF law changes, the
Council is again reminded that any assistance granted for this type of
development will result in a 26% reduction in our local government aid
receipts. As I noted earlier, there are certainly a number of reasons for
supporting the use of tax increment financing and, likewise, there are a
number of reasons to deny the use.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
to. Consideration of an offer on oronerty in the Oakwood Industrial
Park 2nd Addition - H -Window. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
At the previous Council meeting, the Council was presented with an offer
from Miley Gjertsen for the purchase of a 2.3 -acre lot in the Oakwood
Industrial Park 2nd Addition for $36,000. This is one of six lots owned by
the City situated along the cul-de-sac off of Dundas Road between Standard
Iron and H -Window Company. The Council agreed to accept the offer but
agreed to give H -Window Company 10 days to exercise the right of first
refusal on this lot. In other words, if H -Window did not make some type of
commitment to purchase the property by Monday night, September 26, the
Council was agreeable to accepting the offer from Mr. Gjertsen.
In discussing the situation with Mr. Steve Lemme of H -Window,
Mr. Lemme acknowledged that the H -Window Company was stall definitely
interested in the future acquisition of Lots 1, 2, and 3, which are located on
the west side of the cul-de-sac closest to their present facility. In regard to
the three lots on the east side of the cul-de-sac, of which Lot 4 is the one we
have received the offer on, Mr. Lemme felt that the acquisition of these lots
for future expansion was not as important as the three lots on the west
side, but they may be interested in trying to work out some type of an
arrangement with the City to eventually purchase these lots and cover the
City's carrying cost in the meantime by making an annual payment for the
option rights. In effect, if H -Window makes this type of offer, they would be
covering the City's carrying cost by agreeing to hold the lots until they are
actually needed and purchased.
At the time this item is being prepared (Friday morning), 1 had not received
a formal response from H -Window but do expect one by Monday. Although
1 cannot be certain of the proposal, 1 expect that H -Window would like to
propose the purchase of the westerly three lots, possibly by some type of
contract for deed arrangement, and I also believe they are going to be
interested in proposing some type of eventual purchase of the other three
lots through some type of option agreement and annual payments to the
City for us to hold the property. If this type of offer was made, the Council
may want to look favorably upon such an arrangement in that it
accomplishes both goals of providing sufficient room for the H -Window
Company to expand in the future, commits H -Window to the actual
purchase of part of the property, and also covers the City's holding cost for
any parcels not purchased at this time.
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
Again, I'm only speculating based on rumors at this point, but I do believe
H -Window will respond with some type of offer as noted above. While this
may not be the equivalent to a cash offer proposed by Mr. Gjertsen for the
one lot, the purchase by H -Window Company of all the parcels I believe
would be more beneficial for the City in the long run if an acceptable
agreement can be worked out between both parties.
At the recent IDC meeting, it was the general consensus of the committee
that it was hoped the City and H -Window could come to some type of
satisfactory arrangement regarding these parcels, but it was also noted that
they understood the City should not be playing favoritism by holding certain
properties without any compensation, as it would be setting a precedent for
all current industrial park property owners to request the same
consideration of the City.
It is assumed that additional information will be provided at the Council
meeting concerning any offer presented. If the Council does not hear from
H -Window by Monday night, the Council can direct the staff to proceed with
acceptance of the first offer in the amount of $36,000 from Miley Gjertsen.
Likewise, even if an offer is made from H -Window, the Council may not find
it acceptable and may still want to accept the offer from Mr. Gjertsen.
Council Agenda - 9/26(94
i . Consideration of renewing contract operations of the Citv's,
wastewater treatment plant with Professional Services Groan. W.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City of Monticello first entered into partnership with Professional
Services Group (PSG) for contract operations of our wastewater treatment
plant in September of 1986. At that time, a special committee and the City
Council selected contract operations for the wastewater treatment plant due
to the following reasons:
1. Cost being incurred to (run) the plant at efficiencies greater
than that required by the discharge standards.
2. Lack of (long-term) maintenance of plant equipment and
facilities.
3. Staffing deficiencies due to employee absences and request
from treatment plant management for additional personnel.
(The plant was staffed with four individuals plus part-time
personnel. A fifth full-time employee was requested.)
4. Lack of adequate training of present staff.
5. Lack of proper sludge management techniques being practiced
at the plant.
6. Improper operation of various plant equipment items, which
required increase in gas and electrical consumption, with
resulting increase in utility costs.
7. Improper management at the plant.
8. Poor recordkeeping practices.
9. Lack of communication between (plant) and (city hall).
Our current contract with PSG is a five-year contract and expires on
December 31, 1994. Under this contract, PSG is required to operate and
maintain the wastewater treatment plant and to pay the bills, including
general operating supplies as well as chlorine, natural gas, and electrical
usage. The contract has a repair maintenance allowance of $30,000 for
parts and outside repair servicer not within the normal technical expertise
12
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
of PSG. This would be an item such as an electronics expert to repair the
control panel electronics. If the parts in any given year are less than
$30,000, we are rebated; and if they are more, we are notified ahead of
time, and we pay the additional. The current contract has a CPI escalator
of 3.5% on the base fee. The base fee does not include the repair and
maintenance budget of $30,000, the electrical costs, and the cost of chlorine
or natural gas. The CPI of 3.5% is fixed unless the CPI is outside of a
window from 1.5% to 5.5%. If the CPI is less than 1.5% or more than 5.5%,
we subtract 1.5% from the CPI. This then gives us a reasonably fixed
contract, which is only variable upon extreme cases. The cost for natural
gas, chlorine, and electricity can only be increased if the individual rates
charged for those materials by outside vendors or utility companies change.
Over the past few years, we have negotiated with PSG at the end of each
year a figure slightly less than the 3.5%. For example, in 1994, the base fee
increased by 2.21%; in 1993,3.43%; and in 1992,3.43%. The 1994 annual
contract fee is $382,068. This amount included the $30,000 repair and
maintenance fund and $48,028 in electricity, natural gas, and chlorine costs.
These utility costs are based upon the rates in effect in 1990 when this five-
year contract took effect. Consequently, at the end of each year, we have to
add back in the increase rate cost over 1990 for electricity and natural gas.
The estimated figure for 1994 is $2,460. Adding this to the original 1994
contract amount brings us to a contract value of $384,528 for 1994. The
actual year-end figure could be higher if the repair and maintenance
allowance is exceeded or if PSG receives additional funds for extra costs due
to the inoperability of digester N2.
Rick and I have met with representatives of PSG several times on the new
proposed contract. The new contract amount is $395,113, an increase of
$10,585. There are a few changes in the proposed contract. The following
is a list of some of the key changes.
The base line flow that the wastewater treatment plant can
receive has been increased 9.226 to 655,000 gallons per day. A
high or low change of scope trigger of 20% is still included on
this amount.
2. The base line for treatment of BOD at the wastewater
treatment plant has been ingrense4 P,3% to 1,990 pounds per
day. The change of scope trigger of 15% for DOD has been
maintained.
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
3. The base line for treatment of total suspended solids at the
wastewater treatment plant has been increased by 24.5% to
1,370 pounds per day. The change of scope trigger of 15% for
TSS has been maintained.
4. The rate increases for chlorine and natural gas have been
rolled into the contract and are now covered by the CPI
increase only no matter now much is used or how much the
costs increase.
5. The new contract includes the costs to operate the new
chlorination/dechlorination system. Chemicals for this sytem
are costly and are now included.
6. A formula modification has been included to increase the
annual fee should Northern States Power increase the
electrical rates. This would plug into the annual fee so that we
would not be going back two, three, or four years and
recalculating each time. The contract amount would be more
indicative of what our actual costs are. If no electrical rate
increases by NSP are initiated, the affect to the annual
contract is zero.
7. A section has been added so that PSG and the City will
negotiate a yearly contract increase and that the CPI window
or formula only applies if an agreement cannot be reached. As
stated previously in the text, for the last three years we have
negotiated a contract slightly less than that shown in
Appendix J. We are also using a CPI which is available three
months prior to the end of each contract year rather than
trying to have to project three months into the future for the
end of the contract year at the time of contract discussions.
One of the questions you may be asking yourself is, "Can we return to
operating the wastewater treatment plant ourselves?" The answer is yes.
Our contract is so written that upon termination by the City, PSG will
assist us in resuming operation (at cost + 10%). PSG has no exclusive
contract with the current employees at the wastewater treatment plant, and
we could make offers of employment to all of them. Whether or not they
would all accept is a different question.
14
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
What one must realize with non -contract operations and hiring our own
people again is we would lose the broad spectrum of support services from
PSG and would have to duplicate those services with outside services and
additional City staff time, especially from city hall. In addition, it is also
possible that we could again develop similar problems at the wastewater
treatment plant, which led us to a public/private partnership several years
ago. Some of those problems were stated in the beginning of this agenda
item. Anyone needing additional information in regard to this should speak
to me or Rick.
In an effort to make a comparison between City operation and PSG
operation, Rick and I established a 1995 operation budget for the plant
utilizing a fifth individual and outside consultants or contractors to 611 in
the void left by PSG in certain areas. The following is the 1995 proposed
budget for City operation of the wastewater treatment plant and a
comparison to the 1990 proposed city budget.
SEWER FUND
PLANT & LAB
CITY OPERATION PROPOSED BUDGET
Personal Services
IM
1995
Salaries, regular
$136,770
$148,698
Overtime, regular
5,000
15,672
Salaries, temporary
2,500
3,520
PERA
6,500
7,264
Insurance, medical & life
22,200
33,278
Social security
11.050
12,849
TOTAL
$184,020
$221,281
Supplies
Office supplies
$2,100
$3,500
General operating supplies
10,000
15,950
Motor fuels & lubricants
3,000
3,500
Clothing supplies
2,800
4,000
Maint of equip. supplies
18,000
18,000
Maint. of veh. supplies
2,000
2,000
Maint, of b1g. supplies
1,000
1,000
Small tools & minor equip.
M
80Q
TOTAL
$39,400
$48,760
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
Other Services & Charges
1990
1995
Professional services
$15,000
•$24,000
Communications
3,000
4,000
Travel -conference -schools
1,500
1,800
Utilities, electrical
$28,000
$42,000
Utilities, heating
10,000
11,200
Maint. of equip.
6,500
6,500
Maint. of vehicles
1,000
1,000
Maint. of building
1,500
1,500
Rental of equipment
1,400
1,600
Dues, memberships, subsc.
450
1,000
Taxes & licenses
N/A
N/A
Books
150
200
Miscellaneous
150
500
WWTP liability insurance
0
6,200
Safety equip. supplies
0
2,000
Computer maint. & support
0
2.500
TOTAL
$68,650
$106,000
Capital Outlay
Buildings & structures
0
0
Imp. other than blgs.
11.600
'•2.400
TOTAL
$11,600
$2,400
TOTAL PLANT & LAB $30.4,879 "'$378,431
NOTE: Approximately $11,000 outside certified lab, $10,000 for outside
consultants and support, and $3,000 miscellaneous professional
services.
•• NOTE: "Maintenance Pad' and "Operations PAC" software purchased
from PSG ® $10,000, depreciated over 5 years, $2,000 mower
depreciated over 5 years.
***NOTE: Does not include goods and services outside contract services
spectrum.
As can be seen by the above budget when compared to the City's proposed
1990 budget, the most significant increases are noted in labor, electricity,
outside certified lab services, general operating supplies, and insurance.
16
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
The 1995 budget includes a Class A operator/manager at a base salary of
$38,000, and four additional employees at the City's prevailing union wage
(two at lower steps). Overtime and temporary salaries reflect actual costs
and call -outs based on PSG records. In the supplies and other services
category, it is proposed to take advantage of the cost saving procedures
implemented by PSG in regard to operating supplies and utilities. For the
purposes of comparison, we have kept the basic maintenance parts figure
identical to PSG's at $30,000. It should be further noted that our contract
allows us to purchase the computer software in use by PSG at the
wastewater treatment plant. I have included the software purchase price
allowed in our original contract, but for 1995 1 have depreciated it over 5
years.
In order for us to compare the 1995 proposed budget for City operations
with PSG's annual figure, certain items should be added to the City's
budget. PSG currently pays for unemployment insurance and clerical
time/secretarial in their budget. Additional staff time will be needed at city
hall in dealing with the various suppliers in handling the financial data as
well as issuing hundreds of vendor checks, payroll checks, report typing,
and the like. Rick has estimated the city hall support necessary to
accomplish these tasks at $10,700 per year. This brings us to a total
proposed 1995 city budget of $389,131, which is $5,982 less than PSG's
operating budget. This does not allow for extra costs for PSG while
returning to City operations.
Based upon all of the above detailed information, one can state that the
City of Monticello, at least in the initial stages, can operate the wastewater
treatment plant slightly cheaper than PSG. However, when one looks at
the enormous amount of technical assistance provided by PSG that the City
will no longer have direct access to, the difference becomes minimal. Over
the past years, PSG has paid for and prepared two odor control detailed
reports in making recommendations for remedial action, they have prepared
a detailed sludge analysis for the purposes of making preliminary
judgments as to the future of sludge disposal for the City of Monticello, and
they have brought forth numerous experts and various pieces of equipment
from other planta. They also hired an engineer to prepare the preliminary
report for the chlorination/dechlorination project. In the case of the
comminutor and booster recirculation pumps, they were able to get these
pieces of equipment operating when previous operators had abandoned
them, indicating they wero inappropriately applied or misdesigned, which
did not end up being the case. In addition, PSG has brought in a graduated
agronomist from another plant to work with our sludge program. They
have upon numerous times brought personnel up to assist Sunny Fresh in
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
plans for a pretreatment system. It is difficult to measure the value of
these outside services. My guess is that the $10,000 in our 1995 budget
would not cover replacement services. Certainly, having firsthand
knowledge of these incidents, as well as the splitter box study, the aeration
flow split study, the WAS pump replacement, and the pre -facility plan by
PSG, sways my opinion toward continued support of the public/private
partnership.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the new 5 -year contract with Professional Services Group set
at $395,113 for the first year as presented to the City Council.-, C. a
2. Continue further negotiations with PSG, either in the form of a
reduced contract price or other points dealing with the proposed
contract.
3. Continue operations with Professional Services Group on an interim
basis and redistribute requests for proposals to other contractors as
well as Professional Services Group.
4. Return to City operations of the wastewater treatment plant. This
could be done through an interim contract with Professional Services
Group to provide us with assistance while doing so.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The City Administrator and myself favor continued contract operations of
the City's wastewater treatment plant through a private/public partnership
with Professional Services Group as outlined in alternative #1 or q2.
Although the City staff has been negotiating with Professional Services
Group for several months, and we feel that the contract before you is the
best compromise we were able to reach, the City Council could request
further negotiations with PSG. Indications are, however, that they have not
presented an over -inflated budget or contract to us, and there may not be
significant room for further negotiation in price. PSG will have
representatives available for questions and may wish a few moments to
summarize operations past and future.
D, SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the new proposed 1995 contract; Letter of comment by City
Attorney.
is
SEE- -26' N OWN) !' 00 OLSONASSET P. a. TEL S1? 925 5879
OLSON, USSET, ALAN & W NGARDEN
ATTOPNETf AT LAW
sone 9a
PAUL A. WEDNOARDEM 46M FRANC2 AVENUE 80UM
CHADI.D T. Al1AM )ANKLAPOla. MN LUIS
DAVM 1. USSET
THOa w U. OL ON TELEPHONE (6a) n).•w
DENlIa L DAL" PAI( (61T)*tl-971
f rad I.1 P 0.0 �r
oust Fu No. 7975(71)
Jeff O'Neill
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, NH 55362
Dear Jeff:
September 26, 1994
Re: WWTP Operations Contract
P 00?
LFOAL A&MANTI
PEGGY 1. AGA14
UIDU 021. ALLEN
DEDRA L aA101M
PATSY A_ PauL.Ve)
SUN FORT04
TEL VHONE (415) /'7'1-5010
I have reviewed the contract changes in their entirety. I
have focused on those areas where certain provisions are struck
and certain items are added. !Many of the changes are cosmetic or
are date and time changes to reflect the extension of the
contract. Kany of the areas are technical in nature and do not
necessarily involve legal analysis, but rather require awareness
to the City of the proposed changes. Thera are amendments,
however, that will have an impact to "a city. My coRoaentw are
as follows:
I. On page 6, paragraph 4.3 you aro completely changing
Me basis on which the annual fee will bre negotiated in any one
year. I an unable to detaumina the appendix letter reference,
but presume it relater to Appendix J. =he formula prop000d to be
utilized appears to be radically different from that utilized in
the pact. You should satisfy yourself that this is appropriate.
z. On page 7, paragraphs 4.4 and 4.5 it appears that you
are agresinq to pay for additional sums based on a different
formula. You should satisfy youroolf that thio is appropriate.
7. On page a, paragraph 6.6, an additional paragraph has
been added concerning uninourable evento. I am uncertain as to
whLat the purpose of this paragraph to bo. It aimply roquiroa PSG
to uno its boat efforts to minimizo problems but does not
necessarily impose liability upon them It they fail to do Oo. As
auch, it appears virtually unaT)forcaablo. Please advice your
interpretation of what this paragraph is deoignad to addraaa so
that we may discuss the same.
SEP.-26%94(MON) 17:01 OLSON/USSET P. A. T£L:612 925 5879 P.003
September 26, 1994
Page 2
4. In the Appendix A - Definitions, there are new
definitions for •electrical cost plant", "direct cost•, "average
electrical rate plant", and other items. You should satisfy
yourself that these are appropriate.
S. Under Appendix P, it appears that PSG is giving itself
an option to salt insure for workmen's comp. and liability. I am
uncertain it you should agree to this provision. If you permit
them to self insure and they do not have the financial ability to
pay an adverse judgment, you may find yourself jointly and
severally liable for the entire debt. I would also note that you
are waiving rights of subrogation with respect to losses
occurring to your property. This may have the effect of
invalidating your own property and personal injury insurance
coverage. CM= WITH THR LRAGUB TO 888 IF THIS IS APPROPRIATE.
With these comments, i have no othar substantive objections.
As always, I as entrusting your engineer to explain the technical
aspects of the agreement. Should you have other questions,
please advise at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
Paul A. w0ingarden
PAw:lld
G,REENIL-NT FOR OPERATIONS AND
NL•11NTENAN(_E SERVI(J S FOR THE
SION11r' 1:1.1.0 W AS'IT W A'IT:R TRE ATNfBt Zr FACILITY
l H l ti-A(iR1= E tsN }:N1=is nrsdr , •n-+fi i5---,ixy-u(__—, }�'?�-brtwcY-mtl+e t=1 f�' LSF
MUN"F{i_ELI_(=t lureirwli�-r-rc(arc�l to ns <;f1=1'. wlnne mhlr�s i>-2.�U bast lirtmdwuy :TIffS
AGRf?FNIENT is effective :sof the I st (lay of lanuary,, 1995. behveen the CITY OF
1�1C77[� ELLO,(Heac'+a ificr "CITY') whwe aLlilre;sis 25¢ -as Hroadyvay, P.O. Box 1147.
Monticello. MN 55362. and PROFi=SSIONAI_ SERVICES GROUP. INC in�tinafier mkYre.l
to -as -PSG; "hose address is 1.1950 I-leadtrow Forest Purkway. Suite 200,
Ilousrc,n, }r tas- 7032E Xaa 77032:r3842t
WITS rAS,►T5'oWn;,*tdProv tdei for, the gperadnnaP4w`3stearatecheaut>mtfncitity
WH9IR,F,AS, CITY desires to employ the services of P-qG in the maragefircm Ind operafibn of
'loss Cayility it dW G Sas res, n2 perfumt Wch scma. for tlr¢'t;CpWpeusetiun pi uyided I,or herein.
��� TIiE1tEEC11t13. jn 4pnsi(leruiuno,[.tjla.t�uJ4.Ir�l S!tXra!�6.aifu( a►ncuts h,:,reivalter sit
1.I All delini ti,ntsiktf7f7itloll.,f winds or phrases used In this Apreemenr are
contniuc,i inAppendix A.
1.2 All grounds, facilities, eynipntent and vehicles now owned by CITY or 3cyui1ed
by t'I'I,Y aha11 rewain the prolieny of the (:I'I•Y.
1.3 Phis Agreement shall lie governed by and imerl)retc,l in acconlance with rte
laws of tlme state of NIINNI.SOI'A.
1 4 This Agrtfement shall he hihidinp nlwm the successors mrd assigns of each of the
panics. bait neither panv will assign dtis Apteentenl wnhom the pnor wnnen
consent,sf the other parry Consentshall not lie unreasonahly wtdthcld.
t ai All noncL-ts shall he n+ 'A"' I 1119 tmd tru+suurted by L'etvficd utml hr ire tow}x, I'Ye
xddnss xs noted in Alryj n,lix I.Wifje j 4ut111.IQ lila 404rU$," PAW141 a(>,�3'tl.,
1 r, fills Agreement, inch ding appendices "A" ihmugh "I ""K" is the entire
Agrecrttcut I,etuccn die panics. This Agreement may lie modified only by
wnnen ap,rccments mpned by Iwth panics Wherever used, rhe tens TS( '," and
"CI I.)", s,ILill mclit, le the reapecns a of i icc,h. agents, (In'ectorics, elegy ted or
upp,nute. 1 officials. and engrlovocs
M�nn„on �i•.m❑„i IV
1 7 1f any tens, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held by a
colut of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or nrtenforceable, lite
remainder of the provisions shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no
way he affected, impaired d,I invalidated.
IAS II is understood thtl die relationship of PSG to CITY is that of independent
conmtctor.
1.9 Neither Party, one to the tither shall he crinsiderecf'a consumer nix a merchant
...
ursttant;a anycoaswurer. ur'traiie piracticrs IAw or'regilliuitan, And' &," gutiea
spavi�cally aSr-that thesappticatio 14, airy-svah,law$.rrr tyrrtlatirma,Sa-the
Setn!s agt2+ "..v
PSG shall:
2.1 Within the design capacity and capability of the Project, rn:utage, operate and
maintain the Project so that effluent discharged from the project meets the
requirements and crnuhiiouc specified in .Appendix C. PSG may alter the process
and/or facilities to achieve the objectives of this Agreement; provided, however,
that no alteration shall he -Aiihoul lite CI"IY's written approval if alteration shall
cost ill excess of One Thousand Dollars (Sl,000).
2.2 provide and document all Maintenance and Repairs Ihr the project, exclusive of
NSG pfattt labor. The dotal amount for Maintetuutce and Repairs dal PSG will he
required to pay will not exeeed TTuny-Ilwusnrad I'k+llnts iSitl,lNwf dufillp tuay
yenrof thi+ Agreentanr. 4 ATV slmll pry -Pin• nfl Mtaitttetmtive ntui Repairs in
eac��s of dee-Mattttc�tttutcsc: nadf Retmtrs Iintit:t3tC lyjt�;t�,+;� q�{�t+�{� j,
40ApCClfied irt,gtycIt 4, (,
2.3 Provide CITY with lilt accountm}z of t-lamtetumce and Repairs on a momhly
hasis. PSG will provide CITY with detailed invoices Gu Maintenance :rod
Repairs over the Maintenance and Repair hmitLitttit,
-2.4 Rellnle h1 CITY Y entire nlllomil lint aeltaf Maillwit lit" aml Relmlrs clipR.Yhf flim -s
lire lass droit IIte Matmetumee tilt. 1 RgM,tS lilml it, ratty year of ttti, Agrectttent.
2.54 Provide MAINTFNANI Ti PAC, a coammterived preventive nainten:nce
program. Such program will document maiutctance activities, as well as
nminmin historical inion ation. All computer hardware located on site will
become lite properly of I'IT"Y at the lenni ation of service under this
Apreernent. MAINTENANCE PAC rttay he purciased by Cl]'!' al lire
rennination of services under this Agr emend for Fight Thous rlld Dollars
($$,000). flus cost inctudes all fees and licenses f„r danahases employed in the
MAINTENANCE PAC program. Such stun to be paid to PSG in accordance
with Article 5.2.
2.6 Develop repair or replacement guidelines for Capital Expenditures. Such
guidelines will incorporate, among other items, notification to CITY of need to
replace and a standard requisition for such Capital Expenditures.
2.;'4 Provide OPER.ATIONS PAC, which is a computerized process control system.
Such system will maintain accurate current records, as well as historical data and
trends. Such software may be purchased by CITY at the termination of services
under this Agreement for Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000) Such sum to be paid
to PSG in accordance with Article 5.2.
2.81 Maintain the present industrial waste sampling and laboratory analysis program
as described in Appendix D. Results of ill industrial sampling and testing shall
be reported to CITY in a timely manner.
2.4# Provide for all laboratory testing and sampling required by the plant performance
portion of current NPDES permit, process control and die curent disposal
program. Any changes in requirements by any authorized Agency, City,
County, State or Federal Governments may increase or decrease the scope of
this Agreement.
2. IQ Prepare the required NPDES permit plant performance reports and submit these
to CITY for transmittal to the appropriate agencies.
2.1411 PSG will staff the Project with a licensed State of Minnesota "A" WWTP
operator per Minnesota requirements and a minimum of one (1) additional
operator with a 'Y." W WTP operator license and the qualification to write the
"B" WWT1' license unless otherwise agreed to in writing between PSG and the
City.
2.12j] Staff the Project with employees who have met the certification requirements of
the State ofMinncsota. Meet the Department of Transportation requirements for
appropriate employees driving over the road sludge vehicles with annual drivers
licenses checks.
2. 4.0 Provide to all employees PSG's extensive training program. Such program
contains classroom and hands-on training as defined in Appendix G.
2.14.1 Provide adequate staff to properly operate ami maintain the Facility to nw- the
regulatory agency nnil safety requirements eight (8) hours per tiny Monday
through Friday, except for holidays. On weekends and holidays, staff will be
provided for two (2) hunts each day. Such staff shall he coordinated with die
(:ily Water Department. Standby on-call personnel will he available seven days
per week. tw•enry•futmr (24) hours per day,
m-nctnn r,ettno Q
IWVI nnnt V•wt
2.141.1 Cooperate with City to coordinate cost accounting and inventory control
procedures.
2.4-60 Pay all cost incurred in normal Project operations.
2.47, , Provide for the disposal of sludge to the permitted disposal sites none of which
are further than ten (10) miles from Project. PSG will assist City to acquire
additional permined sludge disposal sites including an annual cost of 5750 for
outside laboratory services and excluding extraordinary costs.
2.1-lJJ,J, Provide PSG's full-time safety program including an emergency response plan
and hazardous material communication program. PSG's emergency response
plan will interface with CITY's emergency response plan.
2.1-96,10 Develop a sludge management program that will include land use and an
appropriate record keeping system.
2.26U Assist CITY to enforce existing and new equipment warranties and guarantees.
2.2+15 Provide reasonable access to City s representative to audit PSG records of Direct
Cost of project.
2.22fj Provide twenty four (24) hour per day access to Project for CrN's personnel.
Visits may be made at any time by any of CITY'S employees so designated by
CITY's Representative. Keys for Project shall be provided to CITY by PSG.
All visitors to the project shalt comply with PSG's operating and safety
procedures.
2.24jj Pn.vide an inventory of City owned equipment (i.e. vehicles, portable pumps, air
compressors, generators, etc.), not permanently affixed to the property that is in
use at the Project when PSG begins service. PSG agrees to comply with the
City's Property Management Control Ordinance attached herein as Appendix If
for all such equipment purchased after the effective date of this agreement whose
cost exceeds $300,00
2.24U Provide CITY on a monthly basis, a report of Direct Cost similar to the format
and in the level of detail shown in Appendix L.
2.25N Coordinate and cooperate with (:;ITV's engineer and contractor to facilitate the
completion of any expansion or improvement to the Project
2.2&ZA Cooperate with CITY to acquire mutual aid agreements with City departments.
2.27;@ Provide at CITY's request n performance bond to guarantee performance by
PSG. CITY will pay the cost of sash bond in acconlance with Article 5.2.
M,mrlcallu !'.nvia ' 0
tn.i
2.29p, Perform other related services to the Scope of Services as directed by CITY.
Such services will be invoiced to CITY at PSG's Cost plus ten percent (10%).
2.29@ Periodically update and maintain Project O&M Manual.
2.30fA Provide an inventory of existing supplies when PSG's service commences. In the
event of termination of this Agreement, the final supplies inventory shall be
equal in dollars to the inventory at the commencement of PSG's service.
2.31•yg PSG shall not permit its employees to utilize any part of the Project for any
personal use whatsoever.
2.RU, PSG shall make best efforts to comply with relevant city policies. It is
recognized that various City policies are inappropriate to PSG.
2.14Z—Provide adequate security at the Project to protect the property and the general
public.
2.340 PSG shall operate the wastewater plant to minimize the, generation of odors in
the atmosphere through an on-going odor control program. Chlor control will
have an equal priority to effluent quality. If odors identified are b=yond the
capability of treatment at the plant, PSG will assist the City in identifying and
providing alternatives to control odors excluding extraordinary costs.
2.35,5 PSG shall not make any unnecessary project marwger changes. When a change
occurs, PSG will use its best effort to employ a project manager compatible to
the City. The City may interview PSG's potential project manager candidates
and express their preferences to PSG, however, PSG hat the responsibility for
final hiring.
3. SCOPE OFSERVICL—CY
CITY shall:
3.1 Provide for all Capital Expenditures.
3.2 Maintain all existing Project warranties, guarantees, easements, and licenses that
have been granted to C IIY.
3.3 Pay all property, franchise, or other taxes associated with the Project.
3.4 Provide PSG, within a reasonable time after request, any piece of CITY's heavy
equipment that is available so that 156 may discharge its obligations under this
Agreement in the most cost-effective manner as stipulated in die Mutual Aid
Agreement attached as Exhibit J.
%*mcenn rmtrnm '
Il, P I-nI hpf
3.5 Provide all licenses forCity owned Vehicles used in connection with the Project.
3.6 Provide for PSG's use all vehicles and equipment presently in use at the Project.
3.7 Provide hauling and disposal of grit. screenings, and trash fiom a dumpster
provided at the Project by the City at no cost to PSG.
3.8 Provide potable water in reasonable quantities at no cost to PSG.
3.9 Provide permitted sludge disposal sites to PSG at no cost. PSG will pay for any
disposal or associated costs exclusive ofload disposal fees.
3.10 Provide all odor control chemicals associated with the trickling filter process.
4. CONIPLN-SATIQN
4.1 PSG's Annaad Fee for life first year,+) this Agreement shall be Three Hulnhr,l
{'wv rtty F.„rr=l fn„r+atnl nal S�w�yety I>,>Ilnrs tS3? 1 +aH);ITuep;Httrithgd Aliply
FjyG,{t1!4�?..Q4Uq,jiy[ �1llS�cety pp�i (�jQ.k,(_3), which includes a
Repair and Maintenance all"wmweL'ia it of TTtirry Thousand Dollars (530,000).
tiuhseyttent years ."mmi Fee -will year am{
exclmh.a the-Rerniralx{ Mnint¢Iwmre alH+wetnti.
4.2 Ifacluid ntnintctmilee cont are IeNs tlmn-the timiule-Ilm ce-tul {
n. r linlit:If actilal'bfeitft4napcw._Otic) ��p�il'� 4tip4tntitUcg$ atn.le;;s.tltait!({e
Mainlatt;utce ¢ria
Repair Liu'u'. 1,S6 w ill rebate on an annnal basis the entire
diffefence to the City. If aenud-tnainfennm a taln{-rcpnirespemfitnrca exteed dre
uroinfLitalice tunl-t.Ymu limit -,if of tw MniultUNWtt 41 Riptut ',qJ klit=q
eu ged {he.AAaintatrarlcti tsnd Repair Limit; the ON will pay on all anin l basis
file excess to I'Se i m accordance with Article 5.2. NS(:a-will ftwify fin fdy
When aeutel ut+ainfetathtV ewl nynlir erf nlitanrs spial lifty xml eirhfy-peft4mo
of the uunufenanee nail repair limit. P3fi will notipy the City when scutal
Mttiruoname and Rapalra expendloves equal fifty and eighty purimit of Ow
AWtuen4nce and Repair Limit. FSG nnn-I'rojt:ct labor may he IWO and charged
toOTX whereasanomiaor..Otberbattafito. t9OTYap,p +f-,I*40butonly_W10
too_ Q ll -AM ,yyal:
4:3 The Anntntl-Fee will be tOt-Ruin-I I.y aprlieath'D of five lMWed1tres-fn
Appeuahx L ,lnwld life i'ottsuutcr Ptivw lndex- iustify-a rcl+ate orluldcd
�tiallrtatyallt+Il:
4.3 The Annual Fee Shall he nepudiffed each year uammea tag four (4) ntonths prior
to the annivers+tty of the ufferuiwt dwe hereof. Should CITY atxl PSG loll 4t
agmeby thq annivt7rsary of the effective date hemof, the,llnnug! Fes Will W
daterminod by the npplicanun of tbo pro edums i4 Appendix J,
4 4 t;F3 willyray ny a�hlitiunal ec�tnpcnsaticmtn PSEi-eHy itrrrcari stiu ��ilwirn
Gast E{ee64eity 6e;t�ctc# iJattrrel E;�s Grit dial we a res rfli-of-rate irteresseg that
.><t;tirdr:dreg-esty-yenrarx!-Si;J00�-ryear{�r-13 '
Ofte4udeq one B005, ftw Y
Freslt-prtMreaenen -prc>b tc tiveal i_:. -till be a ItUlsted
lingeditlrm
eldvrine tilHo a mietimetardF80 A90 If it l of ctrergy sod l Bpi K1 nfdeeaaed
per tnoftjl,;:�� .1 , ::, a :::: rxt 01)9�her per ttwttht fdr
eattrral :pas-PS6-rosy-in�ei��xxy�yuelrrnrit-itxreas..� grmnerl�-
{:4 Q -17y' will paY as a"4*tisi ri to HSG any htcreeses,iii 6WtriGd
qst Plant,►hatoo
t e'tb�y result of �eiagrFfe !i{ It tc� Plepc ink s
sett'.,itl;�yi(yl[ee02aiit'rjt�•riGrs�' � wi11'�r@
cytttim:t.ygar;
'tip' W4PS�i fOr lBbecatQr} cesunB.T%tl:
S�n}'�'ah'.��5'i�'�s$t�i i>r�1AuK�?<µ',►'i�_iz�'.$t.�s�-1�+��
4.4 In the event that a change in the scope of services provided by PSG occurs;,
CITY and PSG will negotiate a commensurate adjustment in Annual Fee.
PAYMENT OF CONTE•NSAIMS
5.1 One twelfth (1/12) of Annual Fee shall be due and payable on the first of the
moods for each month that services are provided. Invoices must be tendered by
PSG to the City a minimum of five (5) days prior to the fourth (4th) Monday in
the month preceding.
5.2 All other compensation to PSG is due five (5) days following the fourth Munday
of each month when invoices have been presented to the laity live (5) days prior
to the fourth (41h) Monday of said month.
5.3 Any monies arising from Article!! -end 4.2 will be paid to the CITY within
sixty (60) days after the end of the initial term of this Agreement.
5.4 I:ITy shall pay interest at an an ural rate equal to the Philadelphie-Natiortsl
Be»k'sN0(1ft ii1.ptlTR gPj�(1R-4,WJ6_'prime rate plus one and one half percent
said amount of interest is not to exceed any limitation provided by law,
on payments not paid and received within fifteen (15) calendar days, such
imerebt tiring calculated flout the due date of the payment. lrittw event th0
t wscs httewilei mitsk exw&A (tory ItMitation provided by low, L> q
��la-klr. ted4a�at1-� 4l�bi>Ib�t��t�u»aln*i��iu sl�llualtadat�
jrl]z�;Lv111f[Y.�.t�31LITY AND INSIIFt NC
6.1 PSG hereby agrees to and shall hotel CITY harmless from any liability or
danages for property ILunage or bldily injury. including death. which may arise
frim PSG's negligence under this Agreement, whether such negligence be by
PSG or by subcontractors of PSG.
6.2 CITY agrees to and shall hold PSG harmless from any liability or d unages for
property damage or lNuhly injury, including death. which may arise from City's
negligence under this agreement whether such negligence by City or by
subcontraction of City.
6.3 PSG shall he liable for those fines or ci%il penalties. imposed by a regulatory
agency for violations of the effluent quality requirements contained in Article 2.1
that are directly attributable to PSG's negligence. CITY will assist PSG to
contest any such fines in administrative proceedings ami/or in court prior to any
payment by PSG. PSG shall pay the cost of contesting any such fines. These
costs shall include but not be limited to the costs that the City may incur through
their own professional representation.
6.4 PSG's liability to CITY under this Agreement specifically excludes any and all
indirect or consequential damages arising from the operation, maintenance, and
management of Project except for those directly attributable to PSG's negligence.
6.5 Each party shall obtain and maintain insurance coverage of a type and in the
ammtlits described in Appendix 1. Bach party stall name the other parry as an
additional insured on all insut,mce policies covering the Project and shall
provide the other party with satisfactory proof of insurance.
6, 6 It iW tuul wattiod amt agreed tut the turd for curutin cervicus, arising urular this
Apuement, may he unir rumble or deemed too curtly to insure. These waulO
iriilude irtstttm:ee where hazar�tuua ur toxin materials utay he introdttcth.i,
imphxtenl or rulcirsed into tine facilities; and instances of desigu or related iluihtru,
or tuisww of the facilities by its customers ar,memliers of t: gar=l public, lit
thorn itsumcusi PSG shalt be solely respnmible for exerting fleet etiirrts to
minimize, arty prtMems; and to reduce CrMs iivauttial exposom Nolblag lteruiti
sluff tetitnvq 1'SSi fpt its I.ia Oty.in Ritts dgm whetq i41F_ib ll PA 1>,p ngg(iSeaR4'
7'I:IiM_1NL7'Li V—NTIaN—D rA! ILLRLML•121L i
7.1 The initial term of this Agreement shall be five (5) years commencing on
January I, 1!W0.1AI7 ,;IThereatler this Agreement shall Iv automatically renewed
for successive tenns of five (i) years each umless cancelled in wnnug by either
party uo less than one hundred and twenty (120) (lays prior to expiration.
7.2 hither party may tennitate this Agreement for a material breach of the
Agreement by the other parry, after Erving written notice of breach and allowing B
\t,�ntlGf ll,�I', ntruct I P��
Ih,n'^^I hwt
the other party thirty (30) days na correct the breach. Excepting breaches by
CITY for nun -payment of PSG's invoices. neither party shall terminate this
Agreement without giving the other patty thirty (30) days written notice of intent
to terminate after failure of the other party to correct the breach.
7.3 Upon notice of termination by CITY, PSG shall assist CITY in resuming,
operation of the Project. At the slate of termination PSG will provide the
quantities of chemicals shown in Appendix K. CITY will pay PSG the Cost of
quantities greater than the quantities shown in Appendix K. if a+)<htional Cost is
incurred by PSG at request of CITY, CITY shall pay PSG such Cost in
accordance with Article 5.2. CiTY may employ any and all employees assigned
to the Project.
7.4 The City may terminate this agreement after one hundred twenty (120) days
written notice for a serious performance related incident which occurs twice
within any contiguous 60 -day period. Such an incident is, but not limited to:
failure to operate or maintain all existing odor or air scrubbing systems (this
does not include breakdowns or shortage of parts or chemicals beyond the
control of the PSG); failure to provide test results or reports in a timely fashion;
release of methane gas to the atmosphere when within the control of PSG;
failure to perform required preventive maintenance on vehicles, piping, systems,
equipment, anti buildings; failure to maintain records of maintenance or repairs;
failure to secure the facility and grounds (excluding dog pound); failure to
maintain an inventory of available spare parts or supplies necessary for the
uninterrupted operation of the plant; failure to repair equipment necessary for the
uninterrupted operation of the plant when repair pans are available; and, failure
to notify the City of a major breakdown of any equipment or a release of effluent
out of pennit specifications in a timely fashion. The City will notify P1G in
writing within 15 days of the discovery of a perceived "serious" performance
related incident. In the event Hutt the City staff and PSG cannot reach an
agreement that a "serious" periunnatuce related incident Iws occurred, the City
Council shall make the final detennitwtion.
7.5 Upon termination of this Agreement and all renewals and extensions of it. PSG
will return the Project to the CITY in the same or better condition as it was upon
the Effective Date of this Agreement, ordinary wear and tear excepted.
121S!'-l,I:I�S F4KCt= NWi�t1(;t:
8.I in the event activities by CI Y's employee groups or unions cause a disruption
in PSG's ability to perfonn at the Project. CITY, with PSG's assistance or PSG
at its owrt option, may seek appropriate injunctive court orders. During any
such disruption, PSG shall operate the facilities on a hest -efforts basis until any
such disruptions cease.
Mmuunn Gnvan
11,041-1 tp
r+F
8.2 if any litigation is necessary to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees which are directly
attributed to such litigation in addition to any other relief to which it may be
entitled.
8.3 Neither party shall be liable for its failure to perform its obligations under this
abnormally
costly, due to t pe yormance is made impractical, abnormally difficult,
or
„N ....,..,,
beyond its reasonable control. However, this Article 8.3 may not be used by
either party to avoid, delay or otherwise affect any payments due to other party.
Mmmcelln r,�v.ct / /
&IU11JAL AID AGREFhE
9.1 The Mutual Aid Agreement contained in Appendix 7 has been negotiated
between the parties.
The purpose of said Agreement is
1) to assist is events of civil emergency
2) to share equipment and personnel, and
3) for the benefit of both parties.
Both parties indicate their approval of this Agreement by their signatures below:
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:
Michael M. Stump
President
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. CITY OF MONRCELLO
DATF• DATF'
WITNESS: WITNESS:
m mticello Gnaact
th rn nnn� ?.pit
APPENDIX A
DEFINITIONS
A.l The "Project" means all equipment, vehicles, grounds, sewers and facilities described in
Appendix B and where appropriate, the management, operations and maintenance of
such.
A.1 "Capital Expenditures" rears any expenditures for (1) the purchase of new equipment or
facility items that cost more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000); or (2) major repairs
which significantly extends equipment of facility service life and cost more than Two
Thousand Dollars ($2.000) or (3) expenditures that are planned, non -routine and
budgeted by CITY.
A.3 "Cost" means all Direct Cost and Indirect Cost determined on an accrual basis in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
A.4 "Annual Fee" means a predetermined fixed sum for PSG's services. The fee includes
Direct Co=t, Indirect Cost, and profit.
A.5 "Indirect Cost" means expenditures incurred by PSG For the indirect benefit of the
Project.
A.6 "Maintenance" meats the cost of those routine anti/or repetitive activities required or
recommended by the equipment or facility manufacturer or PSG to maximize the service
life of the equipment, sewer, vehicles, and facility. The labor cost of the personnel
assigned full time to the project is excluded.
A.7 "Repairs" means the cost of those nun -routine non -repetitive activities required for
operational continuity, safety, and performance generally due to failure or to avert a
failure of Ute cquipmeat, sewer, vehicle, or facility or same component thereof.
A.8 "Biologic -illy Toxic Substances" means arty substance or combination of substances
contained in the plant influent in sufficiently high concentration so as to interfere with the
biological processes necessary for the removal of the organic and chemical constituents of
the wastewater required to meet the discharge requirements of the CITY's NPDES permit.
Biologically toxic substances include but are not limited to heavy metals, phenols,
cyanides, pesticides, and herbicides.
A.9 "Adequate Nutrients" means plant influent nitrogen, phosphors and iron contents
proportional to BOD5 in the ratio of five (5) pars nitrogen, one (1) par phosphorus, and
one half (0.5) part iron for cacti one hundred (100) parts BODS.
A.10 "I itr tritrttFt o tt-nn erw tine tntmth{y c�yt<tf 80:000.1, WH of cynygy tutu i &i i W �tf
fkyitatitl-unit;tilt3tt.41-ttnhY.tf�I^irirf)!�'rtl-�ttite9-ItttiYtY4y}t n7`''3't31`ttnit:tl3lllYMiC•ttt<'ffeL'ttittt
llmlas1u18yofduc-Illtalth.t� ��.{CBQ7�7IllptllTjntt+{I �Q�IC{{tltjj
ai csi W(id ay 43 W4lYikl$.do,Aw:ow OW04i441
Atr�nuall,. ,"onnart B a
1yt i7
Rate PL•int hy'ac iva' i useagc hi ;c"iruax in+juii gf'tbi):nOA
A -i -I "�ununt t�no 1, ,t'=newts d+r n+wxlJy ��rit ill-� 30 3=flwrmreatuulntL�hrlilirint itivrt}t
4=e11ntl-ptthlie-tics4ee (=cert+panie7-stnmtnrci-o41um-re141 rate in fray trrlt,:-trtst day -of
,tic m,mtlI.
A: Pt "Direcr t'nsr' m, -ns the acn+aI twist inotrrad for the direct benefit of the Project inchtding;
Ent nut lirniied ic; e .pendii=b far project tn,w:igemea and lab,'ir, euiplo)ea b�tsetils,
cltrmirnts. Iah sttnpties, repairs, repair part.a maintenance pans, safety supplies: gasoline,
oil; equiprnerd re:stal, ledal-;nd prvftr:sibaW* --rvices'" iility'aasriruicC, trayel'-6mee
siq+plies..oher supplies; uniforms, telephone, postage, utilities, t ioLs, nteudvrsltip;; Md
Al2 "Avenge P.Icctricnt Rite Plant" menns the at'ersge cmt,per itiloivan hour as wlcutaterf (ty
,hiding Lire total L•ilu"It hcnus of energy consumed by the plant into the total dollars:of
plant electrical enit'for the tw c1vc (12)'month period ending three (J)'rnanths' prior'to,the
end of rbcs agreerncttt year. The M ct3 o Electrical Rate Plant for. the 1'4riotl Scptettaber
XK, 1903. to September XX: 14144' is ,!D(XXX dollam per KWk
A.13 "Mainteeuroce :ut:i kepair Li+nit^ «tcn+>.t titer total 1Ltsiutetuuttce and Renttiraxperxlituue9
Oen PS has im iwled'in'tllis .4tuatal EeJsuch ex�urt litures'excflac rtriylq gr costs fui
PSG's staff assignac d to the Project.
4. Id "Unforeseen t ircttmctatwcy" shall nxrett arty event. or uoridiuon w hicli dui an effect on Ufa
rights or •-A0gations of the Itftrtles under this Agreement, or,gkm the Project, which is
hcyoml the reasonable :ontrol of rhe patty relying tborcain and oonsiitutes a juahfiuition
t'u a delay in or non•perRrrtttance of actino requ imd by this Agreetnmt, inchtding but noj
limited to (i) an act of tial, landslide, lightttiuR, eurthyuake, tumado. Cite, explosion,
tl,.xL fai hire to roses" sufficient propertj�• riphts, acts of the public ene+ny; war,
Not kadet. sabotage. insurrection, riot ur ci vil disturbance. (ii) preliminary or final order of
any local, stile or indent court adnriniorzitive agency ar gaveminentul Mtdy of
compo,entjuris,tictiuu, (iii) any change in law, regulation, rule, re,luieenrcnt,
inimptetauon or staliuc adopted, promulgateJ, issued or Otherwise srewifivally mo diftetl
er cltanytrd by tory local, tante or federal ggVegrnwptal btx1y, nal (iy) 1pat of qt inability
to Alain Service(Toni a utility, fru' On exteaw per(a1 of tint, nogoxsstty for Lina npt'{a4W
tool rnaGnterutric� uP(haAnjcr t,
APPENDIX B
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
PSG agrees to provide the services necessary for the management, operation and maintenance of
the following:
All equipment, vehicles, grounds and facilities now existing within the present
property boundaries (excluding dog pound) of, or being used to operate Mys
Wastewater Treatment Facility located at: i40a-lhM E% A.._:.% 1 lentieeNa;
1401 Hart Boulevard
Monticello; Mi4 5536i
i P&L -way, Saiie 200
444E nREGEE) NG :Fh*F WAS MOVED
Minnesota 55362.
N�nucelln rmwa j'
APPENDIX C
NPDES PERMIT AND
PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
C.1 PSG will operate so that effluent will meet the requirement of NPDES Permit No. 1,1N
0020567 (copy attached). PSG shal I be responsible for meeting the effluent quality
requirements of CITY's NPDES perrmt unless one or more of the following occurs: (1)
the Project influent does not contain Adequate Nutrients to support operation of Project
biological processes andror contains Biologically Toxic Substances which cannot be
removed by the existing process and facilities; (2) dischargers into the CITY's sewer
system violate any or all regulations as stated in the current Water and Sewer Ordinance
and have a direct detrimental effect on the project; (3) the flow, influent BOD5 andror
suspendetl solids exceeds the project design parameters which are 0.91 million gallons of
flow per day, a rtaily peaking factor of 1.5 time flow and sustained yreak of 1.4 MGD,
6207 pounds of BODS per day, 3225 pounds per day of suspended solids. The daily
peaking factor is determined on a daily basis. All other design parameters will be
determined on a 30 -day moving average. (4) if the Project is inoperable or can operate
only at a reduced capacity on account of construction activities, tire, flood, adverse
weathe r conditions, labor disputes other than PSG, or other causes beyond PSG's control.
C.2 In the event any one of the Project influent characteristics, suspended solids. BODS or
flow, exceeds the design parameters stated above, PSG Shall return the plant effluent to
the characteristics required by the NPDES permit in accordance with the following
schedule after Project influent characteristics rerun to within design parameters.
Characteristics Exceeding Recovery Period
DesisrParnmel j}y
Maxi urn
10% or less 5 days
Above 10% less than 20% 10 days
20% and above 30 days
Notwithstanding the above schedule if the failure to meet effluent quality limitations is
caused by the presence of Biologically Toxic Substances or the lack of Adequate
Nutrients in the influent, then PSG will have a thirty (30) day recovery period after the
influent is free from said substances or contains Adequate Nutrients.
C.3 PSG shall not be responsible for fours or legal action as a result of discharge violations
within the period (and subsequent recovery period) that influent a) exceeds design
panunclers, b) does not contain Adequate Nutrients, c) contains Biologically Toxic
Suhstarnces, or if the plant is inoperable.
C.1 I1re I tituah�cl l:�r�ty lursrw+cti tfrMle_r this-Adentiwtcnt rrn bxycef et m tAe 6rlhrwit
Projc.>t eharteetetietiea:'+� �11d_+'�IYILTy..4lL�.CI��S64.!(f16��1i;rACi4'��II
M�mneelln �'mvaet ��
lM.nn nab
roe lr
iiafed'jjj+ nt�.5,'.�1fsW-� (
0.n63ftn3-p44iiF�iams-if lollflnwa r�/�Miitkui�is 6P 1 P?F,s3aY< 19!'
l.1per t6y TSS 37 41S -td
Any change of twenty percent (204%) for flow or fifteen percent (15%) for BOD or fifteen
percent (15%) for TSS or mote based upon a twelve (12) month moving average, will
constitute a change in scope.
nettrn#, gists er ..... ...:mat 't. L, )st
nf=t�tttde�rentient-tluni. 1mf}-i�c�i}�-s _ "$�34a�c'{
� ... ,��,. }�3a��1'``.���eanea�-,ir�1',�•cl�rits�+?ut�ha�a�rnE:.fc!tl�,,.,,":�.�
th9.s�s5�ic;churacft�s`ini:gRed gpt gFr.It�.c;��was�ytfu�i fot t�te-..�, e' �Qprz
atttts�i,be."giiibti up'?A au'•trtcis;ttt ihtrd gaiiX-tnut+sftTT11'nri`t?t3
...
sbail�xatua�'•.t►c[iilxl l� reio>ut�gi�l`.�oroi��fgr;ihe c " �S uL
ManmceU., t'. moan '
Pages 17-38 contain the NPDES
Discharge Permit and are available at
city hall if needed for review.
APPENDIX D
INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGERS AND MONITORING PROGRAM
Below is a listing of all industries discharging into the collection system and monitored under the
current water and sewer use ordinance and pretreatment program Project No. x.0855 03!
9
Bondhus Corp.
1laeuullo fmvul I'
r., 11
APPENDIX E
TYPICAL EXPENSE STATEMENT
A,.N AC4'044 T 813)GET AGRJALBALAPACE
.MMM Ct r r REPORT
Total •«««««('usTCttt l'�ri.�.lr`arry •rrrr«I+�j�2 Lt�T)Sf.:r+rrr+
,,,,I I Ali()R - ',Al AR I H) I BudgetAa al I3u,IKoted
V4ri4rWe . MMI BtitijV$hiVuriUK'g
N)02 I ABOR—"IRI NLabor a lBcueEts
41163 l AW )R —1)V I -R I I ME & S I ANI M N' Electncity
5546 EMP 8 ?4FOdwt V
444 FW TiMIFFC%vr
553? GWAR **Al I H
4448 H4)S ilfn*F
4543 WORK 4-4)MP
45e4 PAYR06LTAMAi
5474 PEFi6iopl
4567 fEA6i-E:l49HA
c�l(K S118E((3:�iTR!s("ITiunt uxlRepalry
f:4ttipl RnftM�
(nflaide ar(nce!
IM%of Ukl Meek
,tj rwh"
LWW Clvtrbl w
5469 <YNJ51 Ii I A N I ,�TQW Difeci Cast
4477 ( Hi OKJNFsm Fes
5478 P(N YM I- wrow cunuun
5469 ('HEMA*1141-1(
SS;}6 (Nli6H1�i.-eIBBEAV
"m 1 A1 tit;M11 Y
4523 ('(N pl; IM
VW 1N)()KNrMA4+ti
4424 1 N IF wlk l -Q
+Si2 HH1)i-VI+P1(t-NI
4596 H►01)•'I RAV-104N.F
Syb
(,AA)4 INF
I,w N
Mmuicello C.vwul '
Ilnfln�nl
rr, 41
APPENDIX F
INSURANCE COVERAGE
PSG SHALL MAINTAIN:
Statutory wodcmen's compeusatiou for all of PSG's employees at the Project as required
by the State of Minnesota.
Comprehensive general liability insurance in an amount not less than 1.000,000 combined
single limits for bodily injury and/or property damage.
CITY SHALL MAINTAIN:
I. Property damage insurance for all property including %-ehicles owned by CITY and
operated b PSG under this Agreement. An '°f' RZ-'a'ncludtn vehicles not
P'' Y R Y lt+'ori'�'td!#'I11Y:,a B
properly or filly insured shall be the financial responsibility of the CITY.
Mnm¢dIn t',,nmct
APPENDIX G
TRAINING
We will implement our training program. The pmgram consists of the following elements
A. General concepts of wastewater treatment plant operations and maintenance.
B. Basic treatment plant design required to meet objectives, of NPDES requirements.
C. Unit process operation including theory, design ranges, operation, maintenance and safety
procedures.
D. Record-keeping and interpretation of results including the use of OPERATIONS PAC.
E. Preventive maintenance and MAINTENANCE PAC.
F. Accepted safety practices and procedures.
G. Basic laboratory procedures.
N. Basie first air leehniques.
V Emergency procedures: power failure, bypassing, fire, explosion, flood, etc.
J. Certification examination requirements.
Technical training is accomplished using various methods
A. On-site training is conducted by PSG instructors, supervisors and managers utilizing
standard classroom lecture and/or field demonstration methods, reinforced by direct
hands-on application. Competence testing by written examination and performance
evaluation is done regularly.
B. Individual use of technical correspondence courses is encouraged by tuition
reimbursement upon successful course completion.
C. Off-site training is also encouraged.
D. On-site vendor supplied specific training in equipment and material usage.
Special emphasis is given to developing supervisory skills.
PSG's training program is continuous. Our training provides employees with increased diversity,
depth of skills, leadership, and as a consequence, our clients enjoy a mote efficient operating
facility.
MrmUccllo 1"onaatt � 0
r i,r I7
APPENDIX H
CHAPTER I
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT CONTROL
SECTION:
10-1-1 Purpose
10-1-2 Definitions
10-1-3 Procedure
10-1-1 PURPOSE: It is the purpose of this Chapter to maintain accountability of all tangible
property and equipment purchased by the City, or otherwise acquired, or furnished by other
agencies, This accountability shall be maintained by records kept by the City Administrator, and
by the Director of Public Works, and the records shall be verified at least once each year by a
physical inventory of the pruperty in the City's possession. and reconciled appropriately.
10-1-2 DEFIMTIONS: For the purpose of this Chapter the following terms, phrases, words and
their derivations shall have the meaning given herein.
ACQUISI'rION VAI.IJE OR INDIVIDUAI- UNIT VALUE: The price of the item paid at the
nine of purcticse by the City, including applicable taxes, freight and installation costs. Donated
items or items otherwise furnished shall have their acquisition value estimated on the basis of the
current market replacement value.
NONEXPENDABLE PERSONAL PROPERTY: Any tangible item ofproperty not including
land, permanent buildings or structures having a useful life of one year or more. This includes
any items attached to a permanent structure that can be removed or replaced, and items that have
been installed on other nonexpendable property. An example is a nidio installed on a vehicle.
Roth the radio and the vehicle mast he identified separately.
10-1-3 PROCEDURE: This procedure describes the requirements and pmce(ltres for
maintaining accouxttability of all tangible nonexpendable personal property in possession of the
City. All items, either owned by time City, or Maned or furnished tort from other sources, having
an individual unit value of $300 or more and a useful life of one year or more are covered in this
procedure. Items which have a useful life of one year or more and have an 'individual unit value
of less than 5300 shall he grouped by like item, and the groups shall he accounted for in
accordance with this prcx:edure. Land, permanent buildings and structures are excluded from this
limcedute.
(A) At the time an iters of nonexpendahle personal property is received by the City either
through direct purchase, as pan of a package contract, donation, or soma other nmeans, the item
shall be assigned n Cary identification number, and a tag containing this mtmber shall be
pennanaently affixed to the hem, in a conspicuous place, An entry shall be matte in the City's
prolx-rty log maintained by the City Athmnist 'ator and an individual property card $fail) be
prepared and maintained on file by the Director of Public Works.
M—ncc m, V, Marc!
,, ., t.0
(8) When the item, or group of items is received, but before the item is placed in service, the
following actions will be performed:
A copy of the contract or purchase order shall be sent to the City Administrator.
A City identification number shall be assigned, and an identification tag bearing
that number shall be affixed to the item. The identification number of the item
shall be provided to the City Administrator.
The City Administrator shall enter the item in the City property log, including all
of the following information.
a. Description of the item.
b. Manufacturer's serial number.
C. City identification number
d. Date of acquisition - this is the date the City took actual possession of the
item.
e. Acquisition cost - this is the price paid for the item, including applicable
taxes, freight and any installation costs. If this cost information is not
available because the item is not available because the item is not a direct
City purchase, the value may be estimated based on current market
replacement costs.
f. Grant number - if the item is acquired using funds provided under a
federal grant, the grant nurnber shall be entered.
g. Contract or P.O. number - the contract or purchase order under which the
item was purchased
lr. Ownership - show "City" if procured by the City, or if on loan from
another agency, identify the agency.
i. Location - the physical location of the item when in use. If the item is a
vehicle or portable, show its responsible department.
j. Responsible department - the department responsihle for the item. and to
which the item is assigned.
The Director of Public Works or his authorized representative shall make up a
property card. which contains the same information as the property log, for each
individual item. The location entry on this card shall be revised each time the
item is moved to a new location, and/or the responsible department changes.
The acquisition value shown on the property card, anti on the properly log must
agree itLlhC..t1Wt 9lticsilt1514i520
C. Once a year a complete inventory of all City property shall be conducted. The purpose of
this inventory is to assure that all City property is actually in the possession of the City and
properly accounted for.
The inventory shall consist of actually locating each item listed on the property lug. The person
conducting the inventory shalt physically identify the property item by description.
Llmttrcllo fi,nmcl
•i. ., ,� � ro. Ji
manufacturer's serial number and City identification number from the identification tag on the
item. The location and responsible department shall be noted on an inventory sheet. The
physical condition of the item shall also be noted. This sheet will then be sent to the City
Administrator who will verify that the data on the inventory sheet matches the information on the
property log. A copy of the inventory sheet shall also be sent to the Director of Public Works
who will verify the information on the property cards.
If any property items are located, which are not tagged, then these items shall be tagged
immediately, and the appropriate entries made into the property log, and new property cards
prepared
D. If any items are missing at completion of the inventory, or if any item is lost, stolen or
vandalized at any item, the responsible department head shall immediately notify the City Police
Department to initiate the appropriate investigation. The City Administrator and the Director of
Public Works shall also be notified of the loss, and the action being taken to recover the lost
item.
E. If any item of property is disposed of, the City Administrator shall be notified and
provided the following information for the property log:
1. The disposition of the property, and reason
2. The date disposed of
3. Dollar amount of revenue from the disposal action.
The same information shall also be provided to the Director of Public Works for entry in the
appropriate property card (Ord, #125 - 514tg3)
Mmucenn C' Mtrw
1I
w 14 t
APPENDIX I
Noticesows to-
2-54£ast-$roadway
MUTUAL. AID AGREEMENT
FOR LABOR AND EQUIPMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GROUP, CONTRACT OPERATOR OF
THE MONTICELLO WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
This Agreement is made on this I st day of September, 1986, between the City of Monticello
whose address is 250 East Broadway, Monticello, Minnesota, 55362, and Professional Services
Group, whose address is 11950 Heathrow Forest Parkway, Suite 200, Houston, Texas 11032,
Professional Services Group agrees:
LI To make a best effort to provide men and equipment immediately to assist
dining emergencies such as, but not limited to, lift station failure, sanitary sewer
line failure, water main failure, water pumping station failure, water reservoir or
uuik failure, flood, fire, or flood, or civil emergency involving a portion of the
community, or nuclear emergencies.
1.2 To provide labor and City owned equipment when requested by the Public
Works Director to assist City workers in the routine aspects of public works
when it will not disrupt the activities or operations at the Wastewater Treatment
Facility.
1.3 Provide City owned equipment normally used in conjunction with the
wastewater treatment operations to other departments within the City when it
will not disrupt the operations of the Monticello Wastewater Treatment Facility.
Such equipment provided is, but not limited to the IME sludge nurse unit, the
IME sludge applicator unit, the Dodge one (1) ton pickup with hoist and plow,
miscellaneous shop tools and equipment, testing equipment, and other pumps,
etc.
The City of Monticello agrees to:
2.1 To make a best effort to furnish labor and City owned equipment immediately
upon notification of an emergency as verified by the Public Works Director at
the Wastewater Treatment Facility.
2.2 Provide labor and City owned equipment for use at the Monticello Wastewater
Treatment Plant facility for non -emergency use when its use will not disrupt
other normal operations within the City of Monticello.
MMUC.fto(,MOW ' I
r)mfl 0 q"A 11,4
2.3 Furnish City equipment only (or use during normal operations at the Monticello
Wastewater Treatment Facility when it will not disrupt other operations of other
departments within the City of Monticello. Such equipment shall be, but nut
limited to, dump trucks, large rubber tire loader, small rubber tire loader, 3 point
hitch backhoe, 4 -wheel drive tractor, sewer jet, rodding machine, bucket
machines, 6 -inch centrifugal pump, 3 -inch diaphragm pump, small portable
generator, chain saw, concrete pipe saw, drill press, hydraulic press,
miscellaneous hand tools, etc.
2.4 in the event of a major snowfall the City of Monticello shall plow the main
driveway, the horseshoe driveway off of Han Boulevard, and the lower parking
lot utilizing the Public Works Department staff and equipment. The City shall
also sand the hilt in the main driveway and use the City loader and forces to
push back snow banks within a reasonable time after request by PSG. PSG shall
be responsible for snow removal in these areas under normal snow conditions,
as well as for snow removal in the central area of the complex including
walkways and around buildings, useing a City provided pick-up truck with plow
and a walk behind snowblower. PSG shall he responsible for operation.
Maintenance and Repairs costs of this equipment as provided for under PSGs
normal scope of services.
2.5 The City of Monticello may provide mowing services to the Wastewater
Treatment Plant facility if Public Works staffing and work load permits and
requested by PSG. PSG agrees to reimburse the City of Monticello for actual
costs incurred for such mowing operations.
The City of Monticello and Professional Services Group agree to:
3.1 Keep track of all use of labor and equipment and to be responsible for equipment
maintenance and operation costs when in use and to file with each other an
annual report indicating amounts of labor and equipment used.
4trmncmla r'.mrs.n / /
APPENDIX 1
FORMULA FOR ADJUSTMENT TO ANNUAL PAYMENT
Should the previous years Consumer Price Index (CPI) percent change to that of the previous
year be Preater than or equal to 1 566 or less thin or equal to i i%, �wtll .weff If
mtlstrk• Ohne lint, nit xdttt,utwit, t, tietc- ry alhi will the the f 4htwittgpr,x.-edam ail
adjustrueat of 3.51. to the Annual Fee will occur. If ouWde these limksart adjustment to Amnw)
Fee will use the following pro: edsrte, In all cases srnda this appen&x, adjtwmieni eYulu&s the
Repair mtd Maintenance Limit
If , ....... '.. liealed*9 to be rebated It Mie AAP is eeEaln e
,. .:
d . ..sewd is to bepsidaa PSG.
Where:
AAS - tt4weveat t *& Amsei PeYm-"A,A 44
AWt — Stlbjee yew tii}wiableptrtnen( wMeitexclorsr, W1 -tmtr xt ltriwtetlrtee,
ableemr eleeMral ted t+nton l Mw ow n lto.tfm nr. Much weawered uwki
AfheW 41tial a i 0, s FaU al Fee ►pE..'lfWf$ and as sd) ust+d
annually.
(:1t w4Mer Pnee Index Jor all urban t4m,mm•r t l C.-QArj=WV195W1rW
jifflijilI1,X l lty A%erahet.m pohlt,herl by the 1 i v Ihthhr -d
I aMtr. Flttrenti of I tbor .Mattuttcn ttt Ow I PA rl taMc l w rul bH Mn• mm11lh o1
I kwvnilw? Ira Ihr vent Irn *hwh tta h4tn,ntn•ro 1 nhmm"l pnvun•nt t, butte
mar k• BWtau of Labor Statif3tvi iA the CPI deWied regtxt forlhe inuttth god
(1.") =w116 prior to the pend for whtr.lt ,us ad)wJMnt hr ALa Wd Fat if h6w
cafe opted
r r ,.tt.uftwt Pfwc Index (of
dilirbW#a>wl. LU.s ( ily Average) as published by the IJ S {hpatuth•tn
M 1 nbr r Harman ret 1 ah.a Matt H et m the t PA '\ f .r . NN, , ' 'jII, year rw%tr rlt, Iry Iltal 1,,,wit ta•I, an MIItt WMt"et
fnt w beY�a
de y6pfirband of
Lat> m Aauesa of i .char StatI'lics to lite CI'I detaAea report for the luouth tnrcr
t3) months prior to the penod t.,r %hith:an a dJuShuerat ttr Annual Fee is being
u+kulawt.L
E - AseM9C l loctrtcai Rate Ptattt fcx the twelve (12) month pen,xi ending fifteen
(15) tatuatlas prior to tht period fox %bleb an adjustntecu to Anutnal Fee is bell,).
calculated
F
Average Electrical Rate Plant fpm the twelve ( i2) month period endiacg three t i i
mocaths prior to the beginning of the penud for wbeh an adjustment to Annual
Pet is being wlcuiatel.
X 1.4.Y
t Electrical OV Pltntt di~ iii by the Anmtial Fee
APPENDIX K
CHEMICAL INVEN CORY
To he umortw
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
12. Consideration of declaring the week of October 17.28 as Monticello's
Manufacturers Week. (O.K.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
To recognize the importance of manufacturing in Minnesota, Governor Arne
Carlson has proclaimed the week of October 17 as Manufacturers Week. To
coincide with the state's recognization, the Mayor and City Council are being
asked to declare the week of October 17-25 as Manufacturers Week in the city
of Monticello. See enclosed proclamation.
Manufacturers Week is designed to showcase Minnesota's manufacturing
industries and to increase legislator's and the general public's awareness of
manufacturing's importance in providing high -wage, high -skill jobs for our
communities.
One out of every five jobs in the state is in manufacturing. Manufacturing jobs
pay an average of $33,140 per year compared to service industry pay of
$21,600 per year. In corporate income taxes alone, manufacturing companies
contribute more than $141 million to the state's coffers, nearly one-third of
Minnesota's total corporate income tax revenues.
According to the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training, the
manufacturing wages paid in 1992 for Wright County totaled $61.4 million.
Manufacturing plants totaled 133 and manufacturing employment totaled
2,498.
According to the Wright County Property Tax Analysis By Use dated March
1994, the City of Monticellos market value of 270 commerciallindustrial
parcels is $40,282,600 compared to the market value of 1,545 residential
parcels at $105,117,400. The net tax of commercial/industrial parcels is
$1,900,478 compared to residential parcels at $1,845,002. Note this excludes
utility.
Local activities planned for the week include a gratis luncheon/fellowship with
the Monticello Rotary Club, the IDC Fundraiser Banquet will be linked to
Manufacturers Week, and IDC members were encouraged to make an
appreciation call on their assigned BRE industry.
In recognization and appreciation of the Monticello manufacturers, the Mayor
and City Council are asked to consider the following.
19
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. A motion declaring the week of October 17-25 as Manufacturers Week
for the city of Monticello.
2. A motion to deny declaring the week of October 17.25 as Manufacturers
Week for the city of Monticello.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1 as an acknowledgement of the manufacturers
economical impact to the city of Monticello and the state of Minnesota.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the Monticello Manufacturers Week Proclamation.
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, manufacturing has the largest total payroll of any business sector in
Minnesota, providing $12 billion in wages, and the second highest average wage;
and
WHEREAS, manufacturing produces $21.8 billion for the state economy and is the
largest single share (22%) of our gross product; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing exports brought almost $7 billion into the Minnesota
economy in 1993; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing provides high -skill, high -wage jobs which significantly
contribute to Minnesota's high standard of living and economic vitality; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing contributed nearly $54 million more in corporate
income taxes than any other business sector;
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Brad Fyle, Mayor of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, do
hereby proclaim the week of October 17-25,1994, to be
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, MANUFACTURER'S WEEK
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, to be affixed at the City
Office this twenty-sixth day in September in the
year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and
ninety-four.
(SEAL)
Mayor
City Administrator
IL
Council Agenda - 9/26/94
13- Consideration of adouting a resolution proclaiming October 7. 1994,
as Lvnn Smith Day. (J.O.)
Assistant Administrator O'Neill will report on this item at the meeting on
Monday evening.
f -'
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/19/94 08:59:57
I
ARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
36844 08/18/94 OLSON, USSET,AGAN &
36844 09/18/94 OLSON, USSET,AGAN &
37046 06/18/94 OLSON, USSET,AGAN &
37046 08/18/94 OLSON, USSET,AGAN &
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLA
292 CORRECT CODING
292 CORRECT CODING
292 CORRECT CODING
292 CORRECT CODING
37201
08/18/94
ST.
CLOUD
RESTAURANT
289
CHECK
VOIDED
37202
08/18/94
ST.
CLOUD
RESTAURANT
289
CHECK
VOIDED
37202
08/16/94
ST.
CLOUD
RESTAURANT
289
CHECK
VOIDED
37202
08/18/94
ST.
CLOUD
RESTAURANT
289
CHECK
VOIDED
37202
08/18/94
ST.
CLOUD
RESTAURANT
289
CHECK
VOIDED
275.00CR
275.00
0.00 *CHE,
209.25
209.25CR
0.00 *CHF
29.39CR
33.000R
45.50CR
66.25CR
64.000R
238.14CR *CHE
37208
08/18/94
STATE OF MINNESOTA
461
UNCLAIMED BOND FUND C
127.50
37209
08/18/94
MN DEPART OF NATURAL
118
MATER/SNOW/ATV REG
244.00
37210
00/10/94
MN DEPART OF NATURAL
118
WATERCRAFT TITLE
176.00
7211
08/18/94
AFFORDABLE SANITATIO
802
LATRINE RENTAL
50.58
37212 08/18/94 ARROWWOOD-A RADISSON .90360 TRAVEL EXP/SEMINAR 70.68
37213 08/18/94 BARTON SAND & GRAVEL 305 NEW DEP REG BLD REMODE 39.20
31214
00/18/94
COAST
TO
COAST
35
MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS
41.82
17214
08/18/94
COAST
TO
COAST
35
MISC SUPPLIES/SHOP & G
13.46
37214
08/18/94
COAST
TO
COAST
35
MISC SUPPLIES/PW INSPEC 7.18
.)7214
08/18/94
COAST
TO
COAST
35
EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/TRE
37.48
37214
08/16/94
COAST
TO
COAST
35
MISC SUPPLIES/LIORARY
24.15
37?14
00/18/94
COAST
TO
COAST
35
1MPROVEMENTS/LIBRARY
19.14
37214
08/18/94
COA^T
TO
COAST
35
MISC SUPPLIES/STREET D
21.06
37214
00/18/94
COAST
TO
COAST
35
VEHICLE MTC/FIRE DEPT
6.37
37214
08/10/94
COAST
TO
COAST
35
MISC SUPPLIES/SEW 8 WAT
5.52
37214
00/10/04
COAST
TO
COAST
35
UTILITY MTC GUP/WATER
31.48
37214
09/18/94
COAST
TO
COAST
35
SMALL TOOLS/SHOP & GAR
4.04
37214
06/10/94
COAST
TO
COACT
35
SMALL TOOLS/SHOP & GAR
9.78
222.28
,17215
00/19/94
DELISI.
INC. DBA
55
MISC SUPPLIED/PARKS
130.45
4721S
00/18/04
DELISI.
INC. DCA
55
UTILITY MTC SI1P/WATtR
23.65
'17215
08/10/94
DELISI.
INC. DBA
55
IMPROV/GHRUBS.ETC/L111
326.60
400.90
)7?.1G
00/18/94
DOTY/KAREN
40
MILEAGE EXPENSE
75.04
well
aCH
ERC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
X8/19/94 08:59:57
`WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
37217 08/18/94 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOF
37218 08/18/94 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
37218 08/18/94 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
37218 06/18/94 MONTICELLO OFFICE FOR
37219 08/18/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37219 08/18/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37219 08/18/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37219 08/18/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37219 08/18/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37219 08/18/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37219 08/18/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37220 08/18/94 O'NEILL/JEFF
37220 08/18/94 O'NEILL/JEFF
37221 08/16/94 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
X7221 08/18/94 OLSON & SONS ELECTR I
37312 00/18/84 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COM
37223 00/18/94 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
37224 00/18/94 ST.CLOUD FIRE EQUIPM
37224 00/18/94 ST.CLOUD FIRE EQUIPM
37?24 08/18/04 ST.CLOUD FIRE EQUIPM
37224 08/10/94 GT.CLO00 FIRE EQUIPM
GI:NERAL CHECKING
Di sbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLA
51 COMP SOFTWARE/C HALL 707.94
136
OFFIC SUP/PW INSPEC
1.98
136
OFFIC SUP/P WORKS
4.69
136
CITY HALL OFFICE SUP
197. 87
204.52
*CHI
140
SLO PERMIT INFO
89.60
140
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
139.64
140
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPO
865.59
140
FAY MAR FAB/LEGAL NOT
334.08
140
HELP WANTED AD/CLERIC
130. 90
140
GARBAGE NOTICE/HOLIDAY
37. 20
140
LEGAL NOT/MEAD OAK STM
60. 30
1,663.30
*CHF
161
TELEPHONE REIMS
29. 00
161
MILEAGE REIMS
26. 25
55.33
*CHI
160
TRANSFORMER SWITCH/WA
740. 00
160
REPLACE SWITCH/FIFE DP
59. 20
799. 20
*CNF
644
LEGAL NOT/MEAD OAK ST
279.45
289
LIBRARY SUPPLIES/TOWEL
29. 39
242
MTC OF FIRE EXTINQUISH
33. 00
242
MTC OF FIRE EXTINQUISH
45. 50
242
MTC OF FIRE EXTINQUISH
66. 25
242
MTC OF FIRE EXTINQUISH
64. 00
208. 75
•CH
TOTAL 5.217.
02
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
/^8/31/94 13:28:52
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
36913 08/31/94 AMERI DATA
36913 08/31/94 AMERI DATA
37200 08/31/94 SCHARBER & SONS, INC
37200 08/31/94 SCHARBER & SONS, INC
37225 08/31/94 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
37226 08/31/94 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
37227 08/31/94 STEVEN T ROSSO
37228 08/31/94 U.S. POSTMASTER
GENERAL CHECKING
l4
L
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLj
9
CORRECT COOING
156.000R
9
CORRECT CODING
156.00
0.00 *CHI
229
CHECK VOIDED
221.05CR
229
CHECK VOIDED
55.72CR
276.77CR RCH?
118
WATERCRAFT TITLE
168.00
118
WATERCRAFT/SNOW/ATV R
524.00
.90361
GARNISHMENT REIMS
160.98
210
NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
296.48
TOTAL
872.69
RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/31/94 1 3:47:30
_,ARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
37229 09/01/94 ANDERSON & ASSOCIATE
37229 09/01/94 ANDERSON & ASSOCIATE
37230 09/01/94 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST
37230 09/01/94 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST
37230 09/01/94 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST
37230 09/01/94 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST
37231 09/01/94 CENTRAL MILAN INITIAT
37232 09/01/94 CERTIFIED LABORATORI
37233 09/01/94 DYNA SYSTEMS
37234 09/01/94 ELK RIVER CONCRETE P
37235 09/01/94 G E SUPPLY
37236 09/01/94 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE
37236 09/01/94 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE
37237 09/01/94 GLASS HUT/THE
37238 09/01/94 HENRY & ASSOCIATES
37238 09/01/94 HENRY & ASSOCIATES
37239 09/01/94 HERMES/JERRY
37240 09/01/94 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC
37241 09/01/94 HOLMES & GRAVEN
37241 09/01/94 HOLMES & GRAVEN
37241 08/01/94 HOLMES & GRAVEN
37242 09/01/94 JONES/WILLIAM 0
37242 09/01/94 JONES/WILLIAM 0
37243 09/01/94 LUKACH/JOHN
37243 00/01/94 LUKACH/JOHN
37243 09/01/94 LUKACH/JOHN
37243 08/01/94 LUKACH/JOHN
Disbursement Journal
DESC RIPTION AMOUNT C
10
GRIL L4/PARKS DEPT
240.25
EXPENSE
10
SIGNS/STREET DEPT
1,587.86
EXPENSE
18.05
1,828.11
*C
794
CAR PHONE CHARGES
69.87
327
784
CAR PHONE CHARGES
0.14
18.05
794
CAR PHONE CHARGES
22.06
794
CAR PHONE CHARGES
73.65
165.72
*C
822
CMIF PAYMENT
1,100.21
827
SHOP I GARAGE SUPPLIE
184.64
50
SHOP / GARAGE SUPPLIE
144.20
561
MEADOW OAK STORM SE
1,488.51
475
RECYCLING SCANNER BAT 139.05
64
POWERTROWEL/DEP REG
BL 98.00
64
BLADE/STREET DEPT
46.67
144.67
*C
66
MIRROR/PW INSPECTIONS 0.43
545
EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/
1.376.58
545
WATER DEPT SUPPLIES
265.60
1,642.18
*C
81
LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50
85
GAS/FIRE DEPT
104.85
86
LEGAL FEES/FAV MAR
PR 128.71
66
LEGAL FEES/POLYCAST
PR 66.98
86
LEGAL FEES/HRA MISC
138.00
333.69
*C
826
INFO CENTER SALARY
264.00
826
INFO CENTER SALARY
120.00CR
144.00
*C
327
MILEAGE
EXPENSE
54.15
327
MILEAGE
EXPENSE
18.05
327
MIL':AGE
EXPENSE
18.05
327
MILEAGE
EXPENSE
18.05
108.30 •(
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/31/94 13:47:30
N,WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
37244 09/01/94 MAPLE LAKE LUMBER CO
37245 09/01/94 MARCO BUSINESS PRODU
37246 09/01/94 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
37247 09/01/94 MONTICELLO FIRE OEPA
37248 09/01/94 MONTICELLO SENIOR CI
37249 09/01/94 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
37249 09/01/94 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
37249 09/01/94 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
37249 09/01/94 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
37249 09/01/94 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
37249 09/01/94 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
37249 09/01/94 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
37250 09/01/94 P C EXPRESS INC.
37251 09/01/94 PAUL A WALDRON & ASS
37252 09/01/94 PHOTO I
37252 08/01/94 PHOTO I
37253 09/01/94 PLUMBERY-PURCELL'S P
37253 09/01/94 PLUMBERY-PURCELL'S P
37254 09/01/94 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC
37255 09/01/94 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP.
37256 09/01/94 SCHARBER & SONS, INC
37256 09/01/94 SCHARBER & SONS, INC
37257 09/01/94 STATE OF MINNESOTA
97258 09/01/94 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO
37259 09/01/94 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP
37266 00/01/94 WYBRITE INC.
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CI
804 LUMBER/NEW DEP REG 2,101.97
106 CALCULATOR/CITY HALL 211.94
185 SEPT ANIMAL CONT CO 1,100.00
135 STATE AID/FIRE DEP 31,129.00
139 MONTHLY CONTRACT PY 2,833.33
162 ENG FEES/PATHWAY P 26,158.00
162 WWTP DECHLORINATOR 7.144.99
162 ENG FEES/FAV MAR PRJ 355.50
162 ENG FEES/WWTP EXPAN 4,739.99
162 ENG FEES/MEADOW OAK P 197.50
162 ENG GEES/C HILLS 4T 6,939.94
162 MISC ENG FEES 1,818.76
47,353.68
778 COMPUTER/CITY HALL 2.314.44
830 BLD INSP FEES/J KAN 6,686.50
743 PHOTOS/GILLE PROPERTY 18.83
743 MISC PHOTOS/PW INSPECT 4.23
23.06
251 KRAMER RENTAL REPAIRS 33.00
251 PLUMB REPAIRS/PARKS 20.00
53.00
227 VEH REPAIR PARTS/PARKS 82.90
184 SHOP & GAR MTC AGRMT 65.50
229 VEH REPAIR PARTS/PARKS 86.66
229 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/STR 55.72
142.58
461 MAP CABINETS/MATER DE 155.00
219 SCERG PAYMENT 2.760.51
512 UTILITIES 9.00
755 COMPUTER EQUIP/C HAIL 57.19
TOTAL 104,843.76
MCI
•C!
OC
*C,
°kC fINANCIAL SYSTEM
G/09/94 09:50:3 9 Disbursement uournal
WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLF
GENERAL CHECKING
37253 09/07/94 P LUMBERY-PURCELL'S P 251 CORRECT COOING ?O.00CR
37253 09/07/94 PLUMBEPV- PURCELL'S P 251 CORRECT CODING 20.00 *CHF
0.00
37261 09/07/94 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAFT TITLE 30.00
37267 09/07/94 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 119 WATERCRAFT/SNOW/ATV 225.00
37263 09/07/94 BEST BUY .90362 VCR/SEWER COLLECTION 451.69
37264 09/07/94 DOMINO'S PIZZA .90363 C HALL/BUDGET MELlIN4 17.05
37265 09/07/94 BURLINGTON NORTHERN 337 INS PREM/MEADOW STM S 371.00
37285 09/07/94 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAF TITLE 84.00
37267 09/07/94 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATER/SN OV/ATV REG 183.00
37768 09/08/94 ADVANCED DRAINAGE SY 829 CONST COSTS/MEADOW 2,104.1-4,
7769 09/06/94 AME GROUP t"" #
"#* B NEW DEPUTY REG OFFI 1.107.97
37270 09/09/94 ARA CORY REFRESHMENT 408 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 95.50
37271 09/09/94 ARID CONSTRUCTION CO 831 SNOW REMOVAL DAMAGES/C 90.00
37217 09/09/94 B S H MASONRY .90304 NEW DEPUTY REGISTRA 2,475.00
37273 09/08/94 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 67.59
37273 09/08/94 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 54.016
37273 09/08/94 BRIDGEWATER TFLEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 107.97
37273 09/08/94 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 51.37
31773 09/08/94 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 CORRECT CODING 6.61rR
37773 09/08/94 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 22.94
37173 09/08/94 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES ?0.75
37273 09/08/94 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 103.07
37773 09/09/94 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 24 PHONE CHARGES 29.52
37273 09/09/94 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHOM 24 PHONE CHARGES 120.12
77273 09/08/94 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON t4 GOPHER ONE STATE PHON 187.76
1.304.57 •CH
37274 09/08/94 BUSINESS RECORDS COR 27 ELECTION SUPPLIES 42.98
37274 09/09/94 BUSINESS RECORDS COR 27 SIW/WA7 ER BILL FORMS 547.01
37274 09/09/94 BUSINESS RECORD$ COR 27 SEM/WATER BILL FORMS $47.00
1.136.97 OCH
(37216 09/09/94 C J BROWN BUSINESS 8 SO? CITY NEWSLETTERS • 1,724.34
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
/09/94 09:50:39
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
37276 09/08/94 CAMPBELL ABSTRACT CO
37277 09/08/94 CRYSTEEL DIST. INC.
37777 09/08/94 CRYSTEEL DIST. INC.
37779 09/08/94 0 & K REFUSE RECYCLI
37279 09/08/94 FLICKER'S T.V. & APP
37280 09/08/94 FRONTLINE PLUo FIRE
37281 09/08/94 HATCH -PETERSON SALES
37282 09/08/94 HOGLUND COACH LINES
37783 09/08/94 J M OIL COMPANY
37283 09/09/94 J M OIL COMPANY
/ 17284 09/09/94 JACOSSON/DIANE
37285 09/08/94 MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC
37285 09/08/94 MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC
37288 09/08/94 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SU
37287 09/09/94 MINNEGASCO
37297 09/06/94 MINNEGASCO
37297 09/08/94 MINNEGASCO
37287 09/09/94 MINNEGASCO
31287 09/08/94 MINNEGASCO
37798 08/08/94 MH DEPT OF TRADE 8 E
37289 09/09/94 MOBIL
37990 09/08/94 MONTICELLO HOUSING &
37791 09/09/94 MONTICELLO PAPER & S
37292 09/08/94 PAGE LINK
31292 04/08/94 PAGE LINK
37797 09/08/94 PAGE LINK
'37782 09/08/94 PAGE LINK
37292 09/09/94 PAGE LINK
37797 09/09/94 PAGE LINK
37292 09/08/94 PAGE LINK
DTsburs*ment Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL.
28 FEES/.SALE OF PROPERTY 45.00
429
VEH REPAIR PARTS/SIRE
168.00
429
SNOW PLOW PURCHASE 11,559.44
11.727.44
611
RECYCLING CONTRACT 2,462.15
60
BATTERIES/FIRE DEPT
33.10
510
LADDERS & EQUIP/FIRE
880.07
94
FENCE & GAS CANS/STRE
362.05
483
HEARTLAND EXPRESS P 5.492.66
95
OIL/FIRE DEPT
20.79
95
OIL/STREET DEPT
199.55
219.34
92
MICROWAVE/DEP REG OFF
126.74
107
MISC SUPPLIES/STREETS
74.78
107
MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS
84.49
158.76
114
FILTER/STREETS
33.22
772
UTILITIES
2.88
772
UTILITIES
2.84
772
UTILITIES
4.38
772
UTILITIES
25.13
772
UTILITIES
76.39
111.60
3S9
REG FEE/OLLIE K/SEMIN
160.00
131
TIRE REPAIR/WATER DEPT
5.00
419
MISC SUPPLIES/STREETS
21.30
724
CITY HALL SUPPLIES
29s.99
103
PAGER CHARGES
42.60
103
PAGER CHARGES
21.30
703
PAGER CHARGES
24.50
103
PAGER CHARGES
21.30
703
PAGER CHARGES
21.30
703
PAGER CHARGES
21.30
703
PAGER CHARGES
21.30
*cm,
*CH i
=r11
*CH
BRC FINANCIAL SVSTEM
$/09/94 09:50:39
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
37292 09/08/94 PAGE LINK
37293 09/08/94 PUBLIC RESOURCE GROU
37294 09/06/94 RELIABLE CORPORATION
37294 09/09/94 RELIABLE CORPORATION
37795 09/09/94 kTVERSIOE OIL
37296 09/08/94 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
37296 09/00/94 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
37296 09/06/94 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
37797 09/08/94 STEVE'S ELK RIVER NU
37297 09/09/94 STEVE'S ELK RIVEk NU
31298 09/08/94 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
37298 09/08/84 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
37299 09/08/94 VEIT t COMPANY
37300 09/08/94 VIKING COCA COLA
37301 09/08/94 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY
37301 09/09/94 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY
37307 09/09/94 WOLFSTELLER/RICHARD
37302 09/08/94 WOLF STELLER/RICHARO
37303 09/06/94 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO
37303 09/08/94 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO
37303 09/08/94 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO
37303 09/09/94 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO
37303 09/06/94 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO
GENERAL CHECKING
C
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
103 PAGER CHARGES 21.30
194.90
26 PROF SERV/FAY MAR P 3,850.00
179 COMPUTER OFFICE SUP 341.42
179 PRINTER COVERS/C HALL 18.55
365.9 1
498 GAS/STREET DEPT 804.94
193 NEW DEPUTY REG OFFICE 276.3 3
193 BLD REPAIR SUP/PARKS 14.37
193 SMALL TOOLS/STREET DEPT 1.80
292.50
828 SHRUBS/LIBRARY 241.15
928 SHRUBS/FIRE DEPT 255.07
496.23
524 GARBAGE CONTRACT PY 9.507.4 6
624 SALES TAX/GARBAGE CON 617.11
10,119.57
807 DEMOLITION/oILLE NO 8,260.50
779 POP/PARKS/CONCESSIONS 94.6 0
409 LIGHT BULBS/STREETS 114.45
409 LIGHTS BULBS/SHOP ! G 14S.37
919.92
711 MEETING EXPENSE REIMS 20.00
717 MEETING EXPENSE REIMS 11.152
91.52
219 PROPERTY TAXES/WWTP R 373.08
719 PROPERTY TAXES/MRA 44.07
219 PROPERTY TAXES/TEF 1 1 47.65
719 PROP TAXES/KRAMER R 1,417.57
219 PROP TAXES/POUSTA LAND 31.07
1,914.97
TOTAL 69,466.21
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/15/94 10:31:39
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
37291 09/15/94 MONTICELLO PAPER & S
37291 09/15/94 MONTICELLO PAPER & S
Disbursement .)ournal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CI
724 CORRECT CODING 102.45CR
724 CORRECT CODING 102.45
0.00 *CI
37304
09/15/94
NORTHERN
STATES
POWE
148
UTILITIES
3,368.96
37304
09/15/94
NORTHERN
STATES
POWE
148
UTILITIES
292.20
37304
09/15/94
NORTHERN
STATES
POWE
148
UTILITIES
4,590.70
37304
09/15/94
NORTHERN
STATES
POWE
148
UTILITIES
852.52
37304
09/15/94
NORTHERN
STATES
POWE
148
UTILITIES
14.14
37304
09/15/94
NORTHERN
STATES
POWE
148
UTILIIIES
352.26
37304
09/15/94
NORTHERN
STATES
POWE
148
UTILITIES
221.55
37304
09/15/94
NORTHERN
STATES
POWE
148
U1ILITIES
547.94
37304
09/15/94
NORTHERN
STATES
POWE
148
UTILITIES
856.13
11,116.40 •CI
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37205 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37305 09/15/94 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
37306 09/15/94 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMEN
37301 09/15/94 ASSOCIATED VETERINAR
37308 09/15/94 B & 0 PLUMBING & lit.
31309 09/15/94 BRAUN INTERTEC ENVIO
37309 09/15/94 BRAUN INTERTEC ENVIO
37309 09/15/94 BRAUN INTERTEC ENVIO
37310 09/15/94 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS,
17311 09/15/94 COMMUNICATION AUDITO
7 AGENT FEES/1981 GO BO 191.50
7 AGENT FEES/TIF 89 GO 226.50
7 AGENT FEES/19908, GO B 214.50
7 AGEN1 FEES/NAWCO GO B 200.50
7 AGENT FEES/CONSTR 5 B 263.00
7 AGENT FEES/VEIT GO BD 203.00
7 AGENT FEES/1986-1 GO 183.00
7 AGENT FEES/SEWER GO B 286.00
7 AGENT FEES/WATER GO 6 235.50
7 AGENT FEES/1988-1 GO 231.00
7 AGENT FEES/1989-1 GO 182.00
7 AGENT FEES/1990C GO B 178.00
7 AGENT FEES/1990D GO B 202.00
7 AGENT FEES/1991A GO B 179.00
7 AGENT FEES/1992A GO B 175.50
7 AGEN1 FEES/F HALL GO 216.00
3,367.00
722 ANIMAL CONTROL SUPPLIES 0.25
683 ANIMAL CONTROL SUPPLI 131.95
600 DEP REG OFF/PLUMB & 2,045.00
636 OAKWOOD DR & 7TH S1I 894,63
638 ENG FEES/C HILLS IV A 706.50
638 ENG FEES/MFD OAK IR 1,569.25
3,282.38
25 DEP REG OFFICE./ROCK 105.40
30 DATIFRIES/FIRE DEPT 43.50
•CI
�C
E.kC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/15/94 10:31:39
WARRAN F DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
37312 09/15/94 COPY OUPLCAIING PROD
37313 09/15/94 CULLIGAN
37314 09/15/94 DAN JARVIS DRYWALL
37315 09/15/94 DINO'3 DELI
37316 09/15/94 ENNIS CABINETS/JIM
37317 09/15/94 FEEDkII'E CONTROLS, I
37318 09/15/94 GERALD HELLMAN CONST
3 73 19 09/15/94 GOLDEN VALLEY FURNIT
37320 09/15/94 JONES/WILLIAM 0
37320 09/15/94 JONES/WILLIAM 0
37321 09/15/94 KEN ANDERSON TRUCKIN
37322 09/15/94 KRAEMER/WANDA
37323 09/15/94 LIBERTY COMPUTER SUP
37324 09/15/94 MIKE HI.NNIX
37325 09/15/94 O'NEILL/JEFF
37325 09/15/94 O'NEILL/JEFF
31326 09/15/94 PAUL A WAL DRON & ASS
37327 09/15/94 PUBLIC RESOURCE GROU
37328 09/15/94 STATE OF MINNESOTA
37329 09/15/94 UNITOG RI:NTAL SERVIC
37329 09/15/94 UNITOG RENTAL SI'RVIC
37329 OQ/15/94 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
3 1329 09/15/94 UNI 1OG RENTAL SERVIC
37329 09/15/94 UNITOG REN FAL SERVIC
41329 09/15/96 UNI TOG RENTAL SERVIC
3 7330 09/ 15/94 UNOC Al.
GI NE RAL CHECKING
Di sbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C
41 COPY MCH MTC/LIBRARY
54.40
753 WAT SOFTNER CHG/RENTAL
23. 11
.90340 NEW DEPUTY REG OFFI 1,059.00
.90219 LUNCH/ELECTION .JUDGES
119.81
54 DEF REG OFF/COUNTER 4,820.00
56 PROF SERVIC ES/WATER
109.00
806 DEP REG OFFICE/CARP 3,784.19
720 DEP REG OFF ICE/CARPET
804.50
826 INFO CENTER SALARY
153.00
826 INFO CENTER SALARY
45.0008
108.00 sC
�J
697 MISC SERVICES/ANIMAL
69.23
358 REIMB/ELECTION SUPPI IE
26.00
99 COMPUTER PAPER/C HALL
201.50
.90364 DEP REG OFF /INSTALL C
535.00
161 TELEPHONE REIMB
20.07
161 MILEAGE REIMB
29.12
49.19 *C
830 BLD INSPECTION FEES 2,316.00
26 PROF SERVICES/HRA
362.50
461 MISC SUPPLI ES/ST RIFTS
23.00
211 UNIFORMS
11 .05
211 UNIFORMS
31.10
211 UNIFORMS
16.00
211 UNIFORMS
16.00
211 UNIFORMS
16.45
211 UNIFORMS
76.45
236.05 •C
213 GAS/FIRE DEPT
69.34
TOTAL 34
, 995. 70
[!..RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/19/94 09:13:13
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
37331 09/19/94 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
37332 09/19/94 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
37333 09/19/94 BRENTESON CONSTRUCT]
37334 09/19/94 HIDDEN TREASURERS
3 73 34 09/19/94 HIDDEN TREASURERS
37334 09/19/94 HIDDEN TREASURERS
37335 09/20/94 A.E. MICHAELS
37335 09/20/94 A.E. MICHAELS
37335 09/20/94 A.E. MICHAELS
37335 09/20/94 A.E. MICHAELS
3 73 36 09/20/94 COAST TO COAST
37336 09/20/94 COAST TO COAST
37336 09/20/94 COAST TO COAST
37336 09/20/94 COAST TO COAST
37336 09/20/94 COAST TO COAST
37336 09/20/94 COAST TO COAST
3 73 36 09/20/94 COAST 10 COAST
3 73 36 09/20/94 COAST TO COAST
37336 09/20/94 COAST 10 COAST
37336 09/20/94 COAST TO COAST
37336 09/20/94 COAST 10 COAST
37336 09/20/94 COAST TO COAST
37337 09/20/94 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
3 73 37 09/20/94 HARRY'S AUTO SLIPPLY
37337 09/20/94 HARRY'S AU 10 SUPPLY
37337 00/20/94 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
3 13 37 09/20/94 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
37337 09/20/94 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
37337 09/20/94 HARRY'S AU 10 SUPPLY
37337 09/20/94 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
3 73 38 09/20/94 HERME$/,IF.RRY
3 13 39 09/20/94 KRAMDI!R & ASSOCIATES
37340 09/20/94 LA;ERCARE
31341 09/20/94 MAUS FOODS
37341 00/20/94 MAUS FOODS
37341 09/20/94 MAUS I.00DS
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLA
118 WATERCRAFT 'TITLE 30.00
118 WATERCRAFT/SNOW/ATV R 635.00
435 MEADOWS/0I1CH GRADI 5.778.78
90365 TABLE/COMPUTER/C HALL 20.24
90365 TABLE/NEW DEP REG OFFI 52.18
90365 TABLE/CITY HALL 15.98
88.40
338 BLD REPAIR SUP/PARKS 136.84
338 DEP REG OFF/PAINT, ET 304.92
338 MISC SUP/SHOP & GAR 3.99
338 MISC SUP/STREETS 20.90
466.65
35 MISC SUP/FIRE DEPT 2.97
35 DEP REG OFF/MISC SUP 48.43
35 MISC SUP/PARKS DEPT 30.87
35 MISC SUP/STREET DEPT 330.65
35 MISC SUP/LIBRARY 35.00
35 EQUIP REP PARTS/SHADE 31.95
35 CLEAN SUP/LIBkAkY 20.51
35 MTC OF BLD/LIBRARY 8.94
35 BLD REPAIR SUP/PARKS 4.71
35 MISC SUP/SHOP & CAR 4.25
35 MISC SUP/WATER DEPT 53.98
35 MISC SUP/CITY HALL 4.68
576.84
78 U11L MTC SUN/WATER DFP 14.32
78 MISC SUP/WATER DEPT 11.70
76 MISC SUP/SHOP & GAR 2.89
78 VI:H REPAIR PAk1S/STREET 5.89
78 EQUIP REP PARTS/STREETS 4.13
78 MISC SUP/STRELIS DEPT 10.65
78 VF.H REP & MTC/FTRF. DEP 18.55
78 VEH REP & MTC/WA1FR DEP 5.85
74.58
81 L113RARY CLEANING CONI 227.50
688 ASSESSING CONTRACI1.245.63
780 CARTRIDGE/LASER PkIN1F 98.95
108 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 08.97
108 SHOP & GARAGE SUPPLIES 45.08
108 UITLITY MIC STIP/WATER 5.40
•CHE
•CHF.
*C11E
*CHF
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
ng/19/94 09:13: 13
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
37341 09/20/94 MAUS FOODS
37341 09/20/94 MAUS FOODS
37341 09/20/94 MAUS FOODS
37342 09/20/94 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
37343 09/20/94 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
37343 09/20/94 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
37343 09/20/94 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
37344 09/20/94 MONTICELLO PRINTING
37344 09/20/94 MONTICELLO PRINTING
37345 09/20/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37345 09/20/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37345 09/20/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37345 09/20/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37345 09/20/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37345 09/20/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
r' 37345 09/20/94 MONTICELLO 1IMES
31345 09/20/94 MONTICELLO TIMES
37345 09/20/94 MONTICELLO 11MES
37346 09/20/94 MOON MOTOR SALES, IN
37346 09/20/94 MOON MOTOR SALES, IN
31347
09/20/94
NATIONAL
BUSHING PAR
37347
09/20/94
NATIONAL
BUSHING PAR
37347
09/20/94
NATIONAL
BUSHING PAR
37347
09/20/94
NATIONAL
BUSHING PAR
37347
09/20/94
NATIONAL
BUSHING PAR
37347
09/20/04
NATIONAL
BUSHING PAR
37346 09/20/04 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS
37349 09/20/94 OLOON & SONS ELECTRI
37349 09/20/04 OLSON & SONS ELI:CTRI
31349 09/20/94 OLSON & SONS FI.LCTRI
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLA
108
WATER SUPPLIES
12.42
108
SEWER COLLECTION SUP
12.41
108
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
8.01
172.29
•CHE
185
ANIMAL CONTROL SUPP 1,100.00
136
CITY HALL OFF SUPPLIE
200.12
136
OFFICE SUP/NEW DEP RE
308.51
136
PW OFFICE SUPPLIES
306.51
817.14
•CHL.
137
VERIFIED FORMS/FINANCE
89.14
137
INSPECTION FORMS/BLD I
37.01
126.15
•CHF.
140
LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 2,090.17
140
BLD PERMIT INFO
46.50
140
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
167.04
140
GILLE AUTO DEMOLITION
92.16
140
HEARTLAND EXPRESS AD
435.75
140
ELECTION/VOTING INFO
10.07
140
AFFIDAVITS OF CANDIDAC
46.08
140
LEGAL P11B/FAV MAR PRO
115.20
140
COMMUNITY GUIDE PROFI
817.SD
3,820.47
*CHI.
142 EQUIP REPAIR PARIS/SHA 82.78
142 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/PARK 4.90
87.68 •CHF.
144 VEH REPAIR PARTS/STRF.E 68.35
144 EQUIP REPAIR PART:/SIR 29.48
144 MISC SUP/STREETS 43.11
144 SMALL 100LS/SHOP & CAR 50.77
144 VEH REPAIR PARTS/PARKS 6.91
144 MISC SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 6.09
205.60 +CNE
550 MISC PROF SERV/PLAN & 674.75
160 DEP REG OFFICE/ELEC 3,260.00
160 WATER/EQUIP REPAIR 139.39
160 TRUCK RENTAI./I'RF.E REMO 70.00
3,489.38 •CHF
37350 09/20/94 OLSON, USSFT,AGAN & 292 LEGAL FEES 767.50
ERC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
-1)9/19/94 09:13:13 Disbursement Journal
WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLA
GENERAL CHECKING
37351 09/20/94 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S 173 FIRE HALL CLEANING CON 50.00
37351 09/20/94 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S 173 CITY HALL CLEANING CO 400.00
450.00 *CHE
37352 09/20/94 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 175 WWTP CONTRACT PYMT 37,405.11
37353 09/20/94 QUALITY LAWN MAINTEN 319 MOWING CHARGES 937.50
37354 09/20/94 SIMPLE% TIME RECORDE 376 CITY HALL CLOCK MTC A 139.75
37355 09/20/94 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 219 SHERIFFS CONTRACT 23,322.33
37355 09/20/94 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITS -` 219 ADO'L LANDFILL CHGS 8,592.65
\ 31,914.98 *CHE
37356 09/20/94 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPO 224 MONTHLY coNrRACT PYMT 625.00
GENERAL CHECKING TOTAL 91,955.83
F'RE, E INANC IAL SY° TEM
n8/ 19/94 00 : 59:2 1
\-ARRAN I OAT VENDOR•
LIQUOR FUND
17593 08/19/94 COAST 10 COAST
17G94 06/19/94 DF_LISI, IrJC. 06A
17695 08/19/94 EAGLE WINE COMPANY
17695 00/19/94 EAGLE WINE COMPANY
Disbw';ement. !ourn.il
DE'_CRIPTION AMOUNT CLI
C00004 SUP/METER VALVE REPAIR 30.95
800071 SHLJP.65 83.4'
900012 Al' C MIXES EOE; RESAL E 48.11
800012 WINE PURCHASE 120.28
168.39 ICHL
17696 08/19/94 GRIGGS, COOPER & C -OM 800018 LIC:IJOR PURCHASE
1/697 08/19/94 GkC,SSLEIIN LEVERAGE I 800010 CE.R PURCHASE
17698 08/19/94 JOHNLON PROS WHOLESA 800022 LI0IJOR PURCHASE
17698 08/19/94 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 WINE PURCHASE
1 /699 08/19 /94 MCDOWALL COMPANY 000065 MTS OF EQUIPMENT
17700 00/17/94 PHIL I. It- & 'IONS '--O/E 000037 L[WUOR PURCHASE
11700 08/19/94 PHILLIPS & SONS LO/E 800037 WINE PURCHASE
1/701 08/18/94 U W[C•1 COMMLINICATI 800093 ADVLF.T]SING
L[QU-•R I111VF) TO, AI
6,403.31
1 2,070. 10
613.01
672.81
1,?85.02 *CHT
-4G3.86
1,964.5?
',79.94 It
2, 944 .4b *VIII
26. 10
?3.776. •"
ERC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
1'Q/30/94
10:48:25
Disbursement.
Journal
MIARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CL/
LIQUOR FUND
17702
08/30/94
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET
800039
PEkA CONTRIB/J KALISC
486.68
17703
08/30/94
DISCOUNT PAPER PRODU
800177
COPY PAPER
165.03
17704
08/30/94
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
WINE PURCHASE
880.71
17705
08/30/94
GRIGGS, COOPER & COM
800016
MERCH NOT DELIVERED
79.72CR
17705
08/30/94
GRIGGS, COOPER & COM
800018
DUPLICATE PAYMENT
1,064.57CR
17705
06/30/94
GRIGGS, COOPER & COM
800018
LIQUOR PURCHASE
6,227.01
5,082.72
*CHI
17706
08/30/94
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1,583.91
17706
08/30/94
JOHNSON BRG 'WHOLESA
800022
WINE PURCHASE
1,408.76
2,992.69
*CHI
17707
08/30/94
NORTHERN STATES POWE
800035
UTILITIES
1,121,84
17708
08/30/94
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
WINE PURCHASE
215.51
17708
08/30/94
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
3,658.31
3,873.82
•CHI
7709 08/30/94 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 800040 LIQUOR PURCHASE 234.42
17709 08/30/94 QUALITY WINE & SPTRI 800040 WINE PURCHASE 900.61
1,135.03 *CHI
LIQUOR FUND TOTAL 15,730.52
4
ERC FINANCIAL SY SIEM
Disbursement Journal
13:30:34
!r09/08/94
(*ARRANT DATE VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUN T
C.
LIQUOR FUND
17710 09/08/94 EIERNICK'S PEPSI COLA
900001 POP PURCHASE
378.95
17711 09/09/94 13RIDG EWATER TELEPHON
800002 TELEPHONE CHARGES
167.33
11112 09/09/94 COAST TO COAST
800004 MISC SUPPLIES
?5.66
17'3 09/08/94 CONSOLIDATED COMM DI
800163 ADVERTISING
39.25
17714 09/0e/94
RPURCHASE
19' 394. 15
165. 35
1 7714 09/06/94D041HE IMER DISTRTSMI
900009 NONALCOHOLIC BEER
19,559.50
scl,
17715 09/08/94 DAY DISTRIBUTING COM
900010 BEER PURCHASE
916. 10
17716 09/08/94 DICK WHOLESALE CO..
800011 BEER PURCHASE
2.076.70
31.95
17716 09/08/94 DICK WHOLESALE CC.,
600011 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES
600011 NON ALCOHOLIC BEER
17116 09/06/94 DICK WHOLESALE CO..
2,Ib8.G5
*(>"l
17717 09/08/94 FLESCH'S PAPER SERVI
600116 PAPER SAGS
128.70
17718 09/08/94 G 9 K SERVICE
600129 RUG MATS/MIC OF BLD 35.68
11119 09/09/94 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I
800019 BEER PURCHASE
12,112. 2$
17720 09/06/94 HARTMAN/JOE
800097 MICROWAVE REIMS
104.57
17721 09/09/94 HOME JUICE
800138 JUICE FOR RESALE
92.25
17122 09/08/94 JOHN SON EROS WHOLES A 600072 WINE PURCHASE
1.961.30
2 32 .72
17723 09/09/94 DUDE CANDY i TOBACCO 600021 LIQUOR STS ORESUPPLIES
42 .60
275.32
*c1
17124 09/09/98& MINN EGASCO
800180 UTILITIES
12 .56
17725 O9/08/9 4 MN BAR SUPPLY
600150 COOLERS FOR RESALE
176.48
17126 09/01/9& MONTICELLO TIMES
800052 ADVERTISING
341.15
& SONS ELECTRI
600035 ICE A POP MACHINE
IMS 347 .SO
11727 09/09/9 ` OLSON
17728 09/06/94 PAUSTIS ! SONS
900103 WINE PURCHASE
14S.9b
17729 09/08/94 PHILLIPS • SONS CO/E
600037 WINE PURCHASE
12b.8b
177247 09/06/94 PHILLIPS k SONS CO/E
800031 LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.879.00
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
900011 F000 FOR RESALE
11729 09/09/94
2,?"•es
s`_
BRC: 1)iljoi... ,- SYSTEM
'
09/08/94
13:30:34
Diaburssome
nt Journal
`O ARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
C'1
IIQUCR FUND
17730
09/08/94
QUALITY WINE i SPIRI
800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
286.61
17731
09/08/94
ROWS ICE COMPANY
800041
CREDIT DUE
3.90CR
I
17731
09/08/94
RON'S ICE COMPANY
900041
ICE PURCHASE
?98.84
794.94
RCfIjj
17732
09/08/94
'•T. CLOUD RESTAURANT
800045
MIX FOR RESALE
278.10
j
17732
09/08/94
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
800045
.JUICE FOR RESALE
70.20
298.30
•C'
17733
09/08/94
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN'i
800046
BEER FOR RESALE
29.881.20
17733
09/08/94
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
800049
NON ALCOHOLIC BEER
199.85
29,881.05
scl
17734
09/08/94
VIKING COCA-COLA BOT
800051
CREDIT/POP MACHINE
INS 91.000R
17134
08/09/94
VIKING COCA-COLA BOT
900051
POP PURCHASE
755.95
684.95
•C'
17735
09/08/94
VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY
800079
LIGHT BULBS
93.93
17736
09/08/94
WRIGHT COUNTY TREAS/
800134
SIDEWALK IMPROV PROJ/T 77.75
0,17737
09/08/94
WRIGHi WAY SHOPPER
800108
ADVERTISING
282.00
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
73,354.85
Ci
L.RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
"9/19/94 14:19:43
Disbursement Journal
WARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLA
LIQUOR FUND
17738
09/19/94
FRANCO'S COCKTAIL MI
800178
MIXES FOR RESALE
31.20
17739
09/19/94
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I
600019
BEER PURCHASE
8,191.15
17740
09/19/94
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
503.13
17740
09/19/94
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
WINE PURCHASE
1,070.23
1,573.36
►CHE,
17741
09/19/94
LIEFERT TRUCKING
800025
FREIGHT CHARGES
503.60
17742
09/19/94
MN JAYCEES
800100
ADVERTISING
S2.S0
17743
09/19/94
OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
800036
5 LAMP EXIT LIGHTS
26.84
17744
09/19/94
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
498.55
17744
09/19/94
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
WINE PURCHASE
367.65
866.20
•CHE-
17745
09/19/94
QUALITY LAWN MAINTEN
800070
MOWING CHARGES
175.00
C
. 17746
09/19/94
QUALITY WINE & SF11RI
800040
MIX FOR RESALE
19.95
7746
09/19/94
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
3.329.46
17746
09/19/94
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
800040
WINE PURCHASE
1,417.56
4,766.97
•CHE-
17747
09/19/94
U S WEST COMMUNICATI
800093
ADVERTISING
26.10
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
16,212.92
COUNCIL UPDATE
September 21, 1994
Update on pond area vathwav--Cardinal Hills 4th Addition. (J.O.)
This is written to inform Council that unless Council objects, the City Engineer is
planning on removing development of the pond area pathway from the Cardinal
Hills 4th Addition improvement project for the following reasons:
1. The potential need for the pathway is linked to the timing of
development of the proposed high school to be located somewhere
between the Little Mountain Elementary and Middle Schools;
therefore, it is recommended that installation of the pathway be
delayed until the high school property is developed and until School
District officials have had the opportunity to comment on the need for
the pathway.
2. The developer has agreed to provide the City with funds necessary to
install the pathway at such time that the City deems that installation
is necessary. The developer agrees that the cost to develop the
pathway ($2,900) should be earmarked for the development area and
could be utilized for park expenditures in the event the pathway is
not installed.
3. As it now stands, sufficient pathway easement area is available (lb'
on one lot) to extend the pathway as originally proposed at any time
in the future; however, the design and use of the pathway could be
improved if the City could acquire additional easement area (lb') from
an adjoining property owner. Staff is currently working with the
adjoining property owner toward obtaining easement rights. Based
on negotiations to date, the adjoining property owner appears to be
willing to provide the easement if the developer or City installs a
cyclone fence along a portion of the pathway boundary line.
If you should have any questions on this informational item, or if you feel that it
is necessary to install the pond area pathway at this time, please let me know.
Attached is a map of the area showing the portion of the pathway affected.
C �
JR
0401P
4,ow
COUNCIL UPDATE
September 21, 1994
A Glorious Church granted administrative uermit allowine tent eosoel meetines at
church site on East Countv Road 39. (J.O.)
Enclosed you will find a letter from Dan Gassler, Pastor of A Glorious Church,
which outlines plans to conduct a five-day gospel tent gathering from October 11
to October 16 at the future A Glorious Church site. The tent is designed to
accommodate approximately 225 people.
As you know, A Glorious Church has obtained a conditional use permit to allow
development of a church at this location. Construction of the church facility and
completion of associated improvements have not occurred; however, due to the fact
that approval for the conditional use permit has been granted at this location, and
due to the temporary nature of the proposed activity, it was the view of City staff
that a simple administrative permit allowing the use to occur with stipulations
would be a proper way to handle the request. This approach has been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.
Under the administrative permit provision identified in the zoning ordinance, A
Glorious Church wouid be granted permission to conduct the tent gospel meetings
for the five-day period in October as follows:
1. Whereas, the church has obtained a conditional use for a church use at the
site; therefore, it has been determined that church uses are appropriate at
this site.
2. Whereas, the proposed use is sufficiently separated from adjoining
residential uses.
3. Whereas, the proposed use is temporary in nature and shall not exceed a
five-day period in a calendar year.
4. To mitigate potential negative impacts of the gathering, the following steps
will be taken:
a. Participants will be encouraged to carpool to the site.
b. Parking area will be provided on site and off County Road 39.
Parking that occurs on County Road 39 will be allowed only with
permission from the Wright County Sheriffs Department.
C. Satellites or mini-bifs shall be provided on site.
d. The meetings shall end by 10 p.m.
o. The administrative permit is issued for a five-day period only.
/4-
P 0. Box 119 • Monticello. MN 55362
September 22, 1994
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant City Administrator
City of Monticello
250 Broadway
Monticello, NN 55362
Des Jeff:
Here is the additional information you requested about our tent meeting. Parkers
will be directing cars onto the property and also onto the south shoulder of Hwy
39. I notified Wright County Sheriff's Dept. about the details of our event so
they have it on their calendar. I asked about parking cars on both sides of Hwy
39 and this was acceptable with them. We would only use the other side as a lost
alternative. The people of our church will be shuttled to our property so that
the part,;ng on site will be open for visitors.
The sound system will be set at a level so the tent audience can hear clearly.
The sound level is not intended for broadcasting to draw visitors. The meetings
will conclude between 9:00 PM and 10:00 PM. There will be portable bathrooms on
site .
Sincerely
Dan Cessler
Pastor
295-2499
enclosures: flyer
letter of 8-17-94
DC/lg
G1®r-48Pub
TENT MEETING
October I 1 m October 16, 1994
Tuesday thru Saturday T:00 PM
Sunday 9:45 AM
Singing,
Special Music,
Testimonies and Preaching
On What the Bible Has to Say
About the Abundant life
Jesus Came To Offer Us.
DIRECTIONS: From Downtown Monticello go East on Broadway (Highway 75); Take
a Left on County Road 39 at Traffic Light: Then Follow Signs to Tent Meetings.
If you have experienced a miracle, an answer to prayer or want -to testify of God's/
love, please call 295-2499 Tuesday through Friday, 9:00, am to 5:00 pm or "to to:
/
P.O. Box 119
354 W, Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362 '.
NURSERYAND CHILDREN'S CHURCH NOT AVAILABLE FOR TFJVT MEETINGS
I ---+ hoth-
(brio
P.O. Box 119 • Mun9oft. MN 55jG2
August 17, 1 994
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant City Administrator
City of Monticello
250 Broadway
Monticello. MN 5562
Dear Jeff:
I would like to inform you and Lite city staff of a
Special event we will be having on our property on
B. Highway 99, October 11-16. We will be erecting o
40' ■ 60' Cent and conducLing evening "gospel tent
meetings" at 7:0Opm, with our final meeting on Sunday
morning, October 16. There will be temporary electrical
power for lighting and sound. There will be someone
staying on the property in a motorhome as a caretaker
during the week. We are planning some car perking on the
property and some on the highway shoulder, with "porkers"
to ensure that cors get properly and safely perked.
After our final meeting on Sunday morning we will be
dismantling Lite tent and removing all equipment. Please
call me with any questions or coements.
Sincerely.
G�� 4", -L
Dau Gassier
Pastor
295-2499
Wit t
COUNCEL UPDATE
September 21, 1894
Status of stens authorized by City Council designed to address workload demands.
(J.0.)
As you recall, on June 27, 1994, City Council directed City staff to complete eight
steps designed to improve our ability to respond to workload demands. Following
is a brief summary of progress made toward completion of each step.
Move motor vehicle department off site. As of 9/20/94, motor vehicle has
been successfully moved to the old fire hall. The total cost to develop the
deputy registrar office came within budget. Please take time to visit the
new facility. I think you will be impressed. New part-time employees to
welcome include Marge Mammenga, Kim Barnes, and Judy Alcott.
Removing deputy registrar and the associated noise has made a dramatic
improvement on the work environment at city hall. Developing the deputy
registrar office at the fire hall and making the move was a big job. Hats off
to all involved.
Create Development Services Technician position. In July, Wanda Kraemer
was hired for the position of Development Services Technician. In turn, Pat
Kovich was transferred to the Utility Billing/Receptionist position. Pat
Kovich was unable to assume Wanda's duties until the Deputy Registrar
positrons were filled. Due to the time it takes to bring new staff on board
and to train existing staff on new duties, Wanda Kraemer is only now
beginning to start her new duties as Development Services Technician.
Office Manager completes meeting minutes. Karen Doty is now completing
the meeting minutes. Hindsight says that perhaps we should have waited
for completion of the deputy registrar shift and for the staff transitions to
be completed before assigning Karen this additional responsibility. Doty's
workload demand involved in maintaining present workload while
organizing the deputy registrar and staff transitions has been significant.
Once the transitions have been completed, she should have sufficient time
to complete the meeting minutes.
Economic Deyelopment Direptor participation in planning and zoning. Sonic
progress has been made in this area with 011ie assisting in development of a
proposed ordinance regulating pole buildings in the 1-1 zone. 011ie will be
playing a key role in the process of updating the comprehensive plan, which
should begin in earnest in January.
Council Update
September 21, 1994
Page 2
5- Hire cart -time Receptionist working half days at city hall. Staff is pleased
to report that Julie Berg has been hired as a part-time Receptionist. Julie
was selected from a field of 60 applicants. When you get a moment, please
stop by so that staff can introduce you to our new employee. She starts
work everyday at 11:30 a.m.
6- Hire hart -time Receptionist working half days at the public works
department. Elizabeth Green was recently hired to fill the part-time
Receptionist position at the public works department. She will be starting
in the next few days.
7- Reorganize existing office spaces. On September 20, when deputy registrar
moved out, City staff made some short-term changes. In the next few
months, a committee of City staff members will be meeting to discuss ways
to maximize office space and improve office productivity.
8- Continue to contract for assistance with building inspections. For the short-
term, we are continuing to contract with Paul Waldron Associates for
assistance with building inspections on an as -needed basis. We have also
taken steps to streamline the paperwork process in order to become more
efficient.
In the next few weeks, we hope to present to City Council a listing of all of
the inspections currently completed. We will he asking Council to give staff
further guidance in defining the proper level of inspection for residential
development. The listing that we will be providing will reveal that many of
the inspections that we currently complete are not required by code.
Council will be asked to determine which non -code inspection items should
be continued. After completion of this process, we will be able to determine
whether or not we need to hire a full-time inspector.
Summary. City staff is pleased to report that many of the steps authorized by the
City Council are now complete. We now expect that as a result of the steps taken,
we will be able to get at many of the tasks that have been sitting on the back
burner and get caught up on some of the work that has been delayed during the
transition period.
COUNCEL UPDATE
September 21, 1994
Gould Brothers Chevrolet oetition for annexation. U.O.)
Council was informed at the end of the previous meeting that John Michaelis,
representing Gould Brothers Chevrolet, and Dean Carlson from D & D Bus have
submitted a petition for city services. The requests stem from pressure from the
Environmental Protection Agency to improve wastewater treatment facilities, and
it appears at this time that the best alternative for gaining compliance is by
hooking up to city systems.
As you may recall, a few months ago Stuart Hoglund and John Michaelis funded a
feasibility study for the purpose of defining the best method for serving the area
with sewer and water. Subsequent to completion of this study, a third alternative
has been discovered that may better serve the area. The City Engineer is
currently working with the public works department toward refining cost figures
associated with the third alternative. Once this alternative is prepared, City staff
will be presenting the information to affected property owners in an effort to
determine to what extent other property owners (Stuart Hoglund, Milton Olson)
would be willing to participate in the project. Once the third alternative and
associated costs, along with interest in the project by other property owners, is
understood, then Council will be asked to consider initiating the public
improvement process accordingly.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter or have specific questions
about the alternative methods for serving the area with utilities, please see me or
John Simola.
cc: Bret Weiss, City Engineer
E N D
I, the undersigned, an employee of Mid-America
Business Systems hereby certif(y� that the microfilm
images ending with4 f\c+��;�n1(a q&&
are complete and 'accurate reproductions of the
original records of 0.,
as accumulated during the regular course of
business, and that it is the established policy
and practite of Mid-America Business Systems
-to microfilm records for permanent file.
It is further certified that the photographic
process used for microfilming the above records
were accomplished in a manner and on microfilm
which meets the recommended requirements of the
National. Bureau of Standards of permanent micro-
graphic reproduction.
ame Date