Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 04-24-1995AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, April 24,1888.7 p.m - Mayor: Brad Fyfe Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the special meeting held April 10, 1995, and the regular meeting held April 10, 1995. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. A. Consideration of a resolution modifying the approval of the tax increment financing plan for District 1-19 (Mississippi Shores). B. Consideration of application for a carnival license - Monticello Mall Merchants Association. 4. Citizens commentatpetitions, requests, and complaints. 5. Public hearing on adoption of proposed assessment roll for delinquent utility bills and certification of assessment roll to County Auditor. 6. Consideration of amendment to conditional use permit allowing a garden center in a B-4 district. Applicant, Cedar Street Garden Center. 7. Consideration of approving a joint resolution approving annexation of the 160 -acre IGein Farm site. 8. Consideration of approving final plat and adopting development agreement - 10ein Farms. 8. Consideration of a resolution accepting bids and awarding contract -1Qein Farms, Project 95-02C. 10. Consideration of approving development agreement and final plat of Cardinal Hills, phase V. 11. Consideration of a resolution accepting bids and awarding project - Cardinal Hills, phase V. Agenda City Council April 24, 1995 Page 2 12. Consideration of a resolution authorizing the sale of G.O. improvement bonds, Series 1995A, for various improvement projects. 13. Consideration of terms of sale - Outlot A, Country Club Manor - David Hornig. 14. Review of liquor store financial statement for the first quarter of 1995, and consideration of approving security camera purchase and expansion of walk- in cooler. 15. Consideration of establishing a marketing strategy for Eastwood Knoll subdivision. 18. Consideration of purchasing a gas detector for the sewer department. 17. Consideration of change order #1 for City Project 93.040, Public Works Facility Expansion and Renovation, Phase II. 18. Consideration of adopting a resolution authorizing the fire department to enter into a cooperative mutual aid agreement with other Wright County communities. 19. Consideration of submitting a letter in response to the Buffalo Bituminous gravel pit EAW. 20. Consideration of modifying the mileage reimbursement rate for Council and employees. 21. Consideration of an ordinance amendment adopting 1994 building code. 22. Consideration of purchase of electric ardair (plasma) cutter for the public works shop. 23. Consideration of accepting bid and awarding project - Pathway project. 24. Consideration of authorizing feasibility study • Meadow Oak 4th Addition. 25. Consideration of bills for the month of April. 28. Adjournment. BUNUTES SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, April 10, 1886 - 5:45 p.m. Members Present: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault Members Absent: None Update on wastewater treatment plant biosolids site search. Public Works Director John Simola reported that the City has been using sludge from its wastewater treatment plant as a crop nutrient source applied to farm land for many years, which continues to be the best and highest use for sludge. Simola reviewed Monticello% history of sludge application beginning in 1987 when PCA permits were first acquired on the Robert Shierts property. These sites are still permitted today; however, the City has leas than 70 acres available. Because the needs for 1995 have surpassed the amount of available land, the City needs to supplement those sites with additional sites or alternative disposal methods. Simols went on to note that in 1992, Council authorized staff and PSG to pursue purchase or long-term lease of farm land within a reasonable distance of Monticello. Since that time, staff and PSG have covered a five - mile radius with state or county highway access. He noted the criteria for selecting a site include land that is relatively level, soil with 8 inches or more water holding capability above the seasonal high ground water table, minimal or no wetlands, and a minimum of 120 acres. Several meetings and discussions were held with Richard Holthaus regarding his property along County Road 108 and Highway 25, but the City's first choice, which met the criteria, was the Susan Hanford property located at County Road 108 and Cahill Avenue. The Hanford site was also reviewed by the PCA, the Wright Water and Soil Conservation Office, and the Wright County Planning and Zoning Office. All information received led staff to believe this was a good site for sludge application. In November 1994, an appraisal was received on the Hanford property, after which Council authorized staff to obtain an option agreement for purchase and/or right of entry for soil testing of the site. At that time, Council was also informed that the City does have eminent domain rights to acquire the parcel if necessary. Simola reported that discussions were held with Ms. Hanaford, and the City obtained right of entry for soil testing. Meetings were also held with Joe Holthaus, who is currently farming the site, at which staff stated they would like to enter into a long-term lease on the property but would consider purchasing the property and maintaining Holthaus as the farmer. It was also noted that although the City bad Pago 1 0 Special Council Minutes - 4110/95 eminent domain rights, this would be the City's last choice. At the March 27, 1995, Council meeting, Joe Holthaus requested that the Hanaford site be removed from consideration, and thr Pity also received a letter from Susan Hanaford stating that she was not interested in selling her property. Councilmember Herbst noted that perhaps the City should pursue the possibility of the Wright County compost facility being permitted to take sludge. He noted that land could also be purchased for sludge application in the event the compost facility is unable to take sludge in the future. Joe Holthaus, the current farmer of the Hanford property, stated that they have farmed this land for 35 years and have just signed a long-term lease. Because root crops such as potatoes, peas, and string beans cannot be grown on sludge -applied land and monitoring wells would have to be located on the site, he stated he is not interested in having sludge applied to the site. Residents living nearby the Hanford site also noted their concerns regarding the composition of the sludge, how long sludge can be applied if the land is not farmed, the possibility of pollution entering the water table, and odors emitted from the sludge. The Public Works Director noted that sludge cannot be applied to land that is not being farmed, and six monitoring wells would be installed on the site for nitrate testing. Kelsie McGuire, PSG plant manager, stated that since most of the time the sludge would be injected into the land, there shouldn't be much odor in the area. Jerry Quaal, owner of Dan & Jerry's Greenhouse, stated that his land is located across County Road 108, and every year water spills over 108 onto his property and into his greenhouses. This would result in his crops being flooded by sludge. After recently speaking with the PCA and the Health Department, Quaal noted that they would be re-evaluating the site, as they were not aware that water floods property across County Road 108. City Attorney Paul Weingarden explained that when cities are searching for a site to apply sludge, they must adhere to the criteria such as soil composition, ease of access, topography, etc. He noted that if a site meeting the criteria is found and the owner is unwilling to sell, the law allows the City the right of condemnation in order to acquire needed land; however, if it would negatively affect adjacent property, the City wouldn't want to do it. He also noted that the PCA probably wouldn't permit a site if they knew other properties would be flooded in the process. Public Works Director Simola noted that if the Hanford site does not work out, staff will look for another one, and a public hearing would be held before the PCA issues a permit on any site. Page 2 Oaz Special Council Minutes - 4110/95 Simola then requested that Council create a subcommittee to work together with the Township on this issue. Mayor Pyle and Couacilmember Perrault volunteered to join the subcommittee. Mayor Fyle also noted that all concerns mentioned at this meeting will be forwarded to the PCA for their review. Consideration of wastegvater treatment nlant e�mansion and review of nroiections for community R25A. Due to time constraints, this item was added to the agenda of the regular meeting scheduled for 7 p.m. There being no further discussion, the special meeting was adjourned. Karen Doty Office Manager Pse 3 9 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING • MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, Aprll 1% 1888.7 p.m. Members Present: Mayor Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault Members Absent: None Aouroval of minutes of the regular meetine held March 27. 199b. Councilmember Anderson requested that reference to "new homes" be added to the motion for item 011 regarding additional tree plantings required on double -fronting lots. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Tom Perrault to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 1995, as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. A Consideration of aonointine Steve Andrews to the Parks Commissrg. Assistant Administrator O'Neill Wormed Council that after conducting interviews, it was the recommendation of the Parka Commission to appoint Steve Andrews to fill the vacancy on the Parks Commission. After discussion, n motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Brad Fyle to approve appointment of Steve Andrews to the Parks Commission. Motion carried unanimously. B. Cppsideration pf ppnointing two individuals to the Senior Housing Alliance Board of Directors. City Administrator Wolfateller reported that Arve Grimsmo and Opal Stokes have indicated a willingness to serve on the Senior Housing Alliance Board of Directors on behalf of the City. After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to appoint Arve Grimamo and Opal Stokes to represent the City on the Senior Housing Alliance Board of Directors, and Council expressed their gratitude to these individuals for volunteering to serve on the board. Page 1 0 Council Minutes - 4110/96 C. Consideration of ioint interviews for HRA vacancv. Economic Development Director 011ie Koropchak reported that at its April meeting, the HRA accepted the resignation of Ben Smith as a member of the HRA. She noted that an advertisement will be published in the M p#cellq 71mes for interested individuals to fill the vacant seat. The HRA will be interviewing candidates at their May 3 meeting, and Koroprhak asked Council if they wuuld be interested in joining the HRA on May 3 for a joint interview. Councilmembers Anderson and Perrault volunteered to join the HRA in interviewing candidates. Councilmember Herbst also volunteered to attend the interviews in the event one of the other Council members cannot attend. D. Consideration of wastewater treatment plant expansion and review of proiections for community znwth. Public Works Director John Simola reported that during the previous Council workshop regarding expansion of the wastewater treatment plant, 76 home starts per year was the estimate used in making projections. It was noted at that time that the plant would be at Rill capacity within five years, but reducing the amount of clear water flowing into the system from Bump pumps, infiltration, and inflow, and performing interim improvements may buy additional time; however, recent review of the projections of current and proposed developers in the city have caused staff concern. Simola noted that single and multifamily housing start projections based upon the most aggressive ecenerios provided by developers could be as high as 300 per year, which would cause the treatment plant to run out of capacity sometime in 1998. Simola went on to suggest that the City dovelop a brief requost for proposals and ask OSM/RCM and two other firma to submit proposals for the interim improvements and design of the expansion of the treatment plant. In addition, staff should move ahead with removal of clean water from the system. Simola also suggested that Council consider setting a moratorium on new development at an upcoming meeting. After discussion, a motion was made by Brian Stumpf and seconded by Shirley Anderson to begin work immediately an the removal of clean water from the system, authorize PSG and City star' to begin interim improvements which don't require additional engineering design, and authorize staff to develop an RFP to be distributed to Page 2 Council Minutes - V10/95 OSM/RCM and two other engineering firms. The proposals and presentation by the engineers will be scheduled for sometime in late May. Motion carried unanimously. Citizens comments/aetitions. reauests. and complaints. A. Brian Swenson, Chair of the Community Education Advisory Council, distributed inrormation to City Council regarding a bike ride and rollerblade event scheduled for Saturday, May 20. The event will take place in the area of the Middle School and Little Mountain Elementary School, and a meeting is scheduled with the Assistant Administrator to discuss the event. No action was required by Council. B. Don Scherbing, a Monticello Township resident, expressed his concern regarding the EAW application by Buffalo Bituminous for gravel mining on County Road 106 in Monticello Township. Since this area borders the orderly annexation area, Scherbing requested that the City submit comments on the proposed mining operation. Julie Lindquist, also a resident in Monticello Township, stated that since the City responded to the previous conditional use request made by Buffalo Bituminous, the City should also respond to the EAW. She noted that the mining operation will affect city residents in the form of noise and odor and that the operation could someday abut city limits as annexation occurs. Lindquist requested that the City request further study by recommending that an environmental impact statement be completed. Assistant Administrator O'Neill stated that the City has received a copy of the EAW; and atter reviewing and identifying concerns, staff will present the item to the Council at its April 24 meeting, which will allow enough time to respond to the County. Continped Publiq Hearing --Consideration of a resolutiop avYardjng contract and ordering project - Southwest Area Utilities Extension. Project 9b -01C. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that this public hearing was continued from the previous meeting pending additional input from property owners and an update to the finance plan. City staff updated the finance plan based on the low bid received and held a meeting with the property owners. All property owners in attendance at the meeting continued to support the project and financing. Signed easements have been received fiom John Michaelis and Milton Olson, and staff is in the process of obtaining an casement from Stuart Hoglund. Page 3 0CP- Council Minutes - 4/10/95 O'Neill also reported that Stuart Hoglund has requested compensation for loss of trees at the rate of $200 per tree. He noted that 13 trees at the rate of $200 per tree would amount to a total of $2,600, which could then be included in the project cost. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Tom Perrault to adopt a resolution awarding the project to Bonine Excavating, Inc., in the amount of $163,153.03 and order improvements for the Southwest Area Utilities Extension contingent on acquisition of all necessary easements. Motion also includes compensation for the loss of 13 trees at the rate of $200 per tree. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 95-24. Consideration of a resolution accenting bid and ordering nroiect - Meadow Oak Storm Sewer Outlet, Proied 93120. Public Works Director John Simola reported that at the March 13, 1995, meeting, Council tabled award of the Meadow Oak Storm Sewer Outlet Project until an agreement could be reached with MN/DOT in regard to sharing in the project cost for the drainage from I-94 near Meadow Oak and the westbound exit ramp for County Road 75. He noted that a tentative agreement has been reached whereby MN/DOT will commit $50,000 to the project. Simola went on to note that there are several assessment options; however, some of the options may conflict with the existing assessment policy and the proposed storm sewer assessment and access policy that is currently being prepared. Simola suggested that since the 45 -day award period will soon expire, Council should award the project at this time and select the final assessment method for this project in conjunction with consideration of the storm sower assessment policy. Ager discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Clint Herbst to adopt a resolution awarding the project to Barbaroasa & Sons in the amount of $327,199.45 and ordering the project. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 95-25. _Qpnsideralign of n resolution adontine negative declaration of impact - I47ein Farms residential development. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the City Engineer has completed a report describing the content of the environmental assessment worksheet along with responses from various agencies regarding the ]Gain Farms plan. At this time. Council is asked to adopt a resolution adopting a negative declaration of impact assodated with the Main Farms residential Page 4 (D Council Minutes - 4/10!95 subdivision. The development agreement, final plat, and bid award, along with annexation, will be delayed until the April 24 Council meeting due to delays in obtaining Township signatures supporting annexation. O'Neill also reported that the developer, Tony Emmerich, would like to begin grading prior to final City approval of the development agreement and award of the project. Emmerich will enter a separate agreement with the low bidder fur compensation in the event the low bidder is not awarded the project by the City. The Public Works Director noted that, regarding the proximity of the proposed holding pond to Monticello's well 114, it should be stipulated that expenses associated with the testing well recommended by the Minnesota Department of Health be borne by the developer, as well as installation of a pond liner if required. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Brian Stumpf to adopt a resolution determining a negative declaration of impact associated with the 10ein Farms residential subdivision. Motion includes the provision that the developer comply with the recommendations made by the Minnesota Department of Health at the developer's own expense. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 95-26. Consideration of approving final plat and adopting development agreement - Klein Farms residential subdivision. Assistant Administrator O'Neill noted that this item will be placed on the agenda for the April 24, 1995, Council meeting. Consideration of a resolution accepting bids. awarding contract, and ordering improvement - Klein Farms residential subdivision. Pmiect 95-02C. Assistant Administrator ONeill noted that this item will be placed on the agenda for the April 24, 1995, Council mneting. i .= u.i y u moi. Assistant Administrator ONeill reported that staff has been negotiating with David Hornig on the sale of Outlot A. Country Club Manor, and has made progress but has not settled on terms. Bemuse David Hornig was not in attendence at the March 27 meeting, this item was tabled. David Hornig noted that his attorney received an offer fivm the City Attorney on April 3 and did not have sufficient time to develop a counteroffer that could be submitted to Council prior to the meeting. He then submitted a proposal for Council review. Page 6 1 -'% , Council Minutes - 4110/96 After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to table consideration of the terms of sale of Outlet A, Country Club Manor, until the April 24, 1996, Council meeting. Council requested that staff present a comparison of proposals at the next meeting. 11. Consideration of establishing marketing strategy for the Eastwood Knoll subdivision. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Orrin Thompson and Vic Hellman have each provided a purchase offer for the Eastwood Knoll property, and it appears that Tony Emmerich may also make a proposal to purchase the land; however, Emmerich was unable to submit his proposal in time for this meeting. Staff suggested that this item be delayed an additional two weeks to allow time to tolled and analyze all the proposals. Council members noted their concern regarding continued delay of marketing the Eastwood Knoll property since construction season will soon begin. It was also noted that if the City is going to market the property, it would be in the best interest of the City to hire an agent rather than burden staff with this responsibility. Since Council members had not yet reviewed the proposal from Vic Hellman, Administrator Wolfateller briefly summarized the proposal, noting that the offer included a 833,000 down payment, which is equivalent to 81,000 per lot. Until December 1996, the City would receive an additional 820,000 for each lot sold, 822,600 for each lot sold until December 1997, and 824,000 for each lot sold thereafter. The offer does not guarantee any payment other than the 833,000 down payment, which would result in the City continuing to own the unsold lots. Council members noted that they would prefer an offer purchasing the property as a whole rather than one lot at a time. Assistant Administrator O'Neill noted that since the City is currendy looking for property for biosolids application and Tony Emmerich is interested in the Eastwood Knoll property, perhaps the City should consider exchanging the Eastwood Knoll property for the 220 acres owned by Emmerich. O'Neill also noted that if Council is considering marketing the property, staff could use the RFP process to aid in selecting a real estate firm. After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to contact local real estate firms and solicit requests for proposals in time for review at the April 24 Council meeting, along with reviewing a possible exchange of land with Tony Emmerich. Restrictive covenants for the Eastwood Knoll subdivision will also be ratified at the April 24 meeting. Page 6 G) Council Minutes - 4110/95 12. Consideration of ourchase of a sinele electronic water use meter. Public Works Director John Simola reported that along with the expansion of the wastewater treatment plant, City staff has reviewed the current sewer hookup charges and how they relate to actual peak usage per unit. The City currently uses a base of 250 gallons per day maximum use for a single residential hookup, and a formula is used in many instances to determine the number of units a specific commercial or industrial user should have. The City has no information from users regarding peak usage per day, and the Water and Sewer Superintendent often spends a great deal of time assisting people in tracking down internal problems so that the City can justify a meter reading and/or bill. To help determine the rate of a leak, as well as determine peak usage to help determine sewer hookup charges and capacity needed in the sewer system and lift stations, it is suggested that Council purchase a Meter - Master System III, Model 100 Rate -of -Flow Recorder, at a cost of $5,585.93. This device straps onto a water meter and records the actual rate of flow going through the meter. Staff tested one of these units in 1994 and felt it would be a very useful tool in our growing community and when considering the expansion of the treatment plant. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Clint Herbst to authorize the purchase of the Sensus Meter -Master from WaterPro for $5,585.93. Voting in favor. Shirley Anderson. Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault. Opposed: Brad Fyle. 13. Consideration of aaorovina a temnorary on -sale liauor license for the Lions QVb in coniunction with the RiverfUt CelebratiolL City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller reported that the Lions Club is requesting an on -sale liquor license for the Ducks Unlimited Banquet, the Riverfest Celebration, and a Russian dance event in July in addition to the one -day non -intoxicating beer license and set-up license which they have been issued in past years. They have indicated that they do not intend to sell liquor products other than wine coolers. He noted that the state statutes were changed to allow municipalities the ability to issue temporary one- to three-day on-salo liquor licenses to charitable organizations. Since this is the first request the City has had for this on -sale liquor license, Wolfsteller stated that Council should also establish a daily fee in conjunction with issuing the license. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Brian Stumpf to approve issuance of a temporary on -sale liquor license and one. day set-up license for the Ducks Unlimited Banquot, a one -day on -sale liquor license for the Riverfeat Celebration, and a one -day on -sale liquor Page 7 9 Council Minutes - 4/10/96 license for the Russian dance event as requested by the Lions Club. Motion includes a fee of $10 for each one -day on -sale liquor license. Approval is contingent upon submission of proper liability insurance coverage. Motion carried unanimously. 14. Consideration of obpervanoe of Arbor Day. After discussion, a motion was nnade by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Brian Stumpf to proclaim Friday, Aprf120. 1996, as Arbor Day, and observe it by having a small tree planting ceremony in one of the parks. Motion carried unanimously. 16. Other matters. City Administrator Wolfateller explained that in order for the City to receive the $50,000 from the Minnesota Department of Transportation for the Meadow Oak storm sewer outlet project, Council must adopt a resolution requesting the lump sum and agreeing to enter into an ,agreement with MN/DOT. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Tom Perrault to adopt a resolution agreeing to enter into an agreement with MN/DOT and requesting a lump sum in the amount of $60,000 from MN/DOT for the Meadow Oak storm sewer outlet project. Motion Carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 96.27. There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned. Karen Doty Office Manager Page 8 0 Council Agenda - 4124/95 3A. Consideration of p resolution modifvina the aoDroyal of the tax increment finandna Dian for District 1.19 (Mississinni Shores). (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As I am sure you are aware, the senior housing project proposed for the property adjacent to the Monticello Hospital/Clinic has not yet been able to come up with all of the financing it needs to continue with the project. The Senior Housing Alliance, along with the HRA and developer, Presbyterian Homes, is continuing to work on obtaining all of the financing they need, but this has caused a delay in the original time table for this project. In light of the delays that are occurring, HRA attorney, Mr. Steve Bubul, is recommending that the City Council consider adopting a resolution that would modify the previously -adopted resolution of March 13, 1995, that established the tax increment district for the Mississippi Shores project. As part of that original resolution, approval of the TIF plan was subject to execution of a redevelopment contract between the HRA, the City of Monticello, and the Senior Housing Alliance. Since all of the financing has not yet been secured, the redevelopment contract is not ready to be executed by all parties. Mr. Bubul has concerns that there is potential legislation still being considered that could affect the status of this tax increment district. If the City Council is still in agreement with using tax increment financing on this project, Mr. Bubul would like to see the district become certified with the Wright County Auditor before a redevelopment contract is executed to preserve the HRKs ability to use tax increment financing as originally planned. Without this certification, it is possible that legislation could be enacted that would hamper our ability to use tax increment as originally planned. It is my understanding if the district is certified but the project does not proceed, the City and/or HRA is not out anything, as no additional taxes will be generated, and the project can be decertified at any time. 13. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Adopt the resolution allowing for District 1-19 to be certified without a redevelopment contract executed between the HRA, the City, and Senior Housing Alliance. Do not adopt the resolution as proposed. Council Agenda - 4/M5 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Because of the potential for the legislators to enact laws that may be detrimental to future tax increment districts, it is recommended that the resolution be adopted authorizing the TIF district to be certified without a redevelopment contract being finalized. According to Mr. Bubul, there are no negative impacts on the City for certifying the district at this time without the project being finalized in that the City always has the option of decertifying the district if the project doesn't go through. Without a project, there will be no tax increments generated, and the only negative is the time it takes to certify the district, which is minimal. D. SUPPORTING DMA: Copy of proposed resolution. CITY OF MONTICELLO R SOIAITION NO. RESOLUTION MODIFYING RESOLVTIONNO. 1985-16 REGARDING APPROVAL OF THE TAS INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-19 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") as follows: WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 1995-18, the Council approved a Tax Increment Flaancing Pian (the "TIF Pion") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-19 (the "TIF District") an Mareb 13, 1995, after a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 489.174 to 469.179; and WHEREAS, under Resolution No. 1899-18, approval of the TIP Plan was subject to execution of a redevelopment contract between the Housing and Red a .'....... 1 Authority in and for the City of Monticello (the "HRA") and Monticello Senior Housing Alliance, Inc. ("Senior Allfsnce"); and WHEREAS, the HRA, the City and Senior Alliance are continuing efforts to structure llaancing for the senior housing facility (the "Senior Alliance Project") to be developed In the TIF District, including Issuance of housing revenue bonds by the City and tax Increment assistance from the HRA, but the HRA and Senior Alliance are not yet prepared to execute a redevelopment contract; and WHEREAS, In view of potential legislation that could affect the status of the TIP District, and In order to preserve the BRA's ability to provide tax Increment assistance to the Senior Alliance Project, the City has determined that it Is in the best interest of the City to authorize certification of the TIF District before any legislative changes become effective; NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello as follows: 1. Resolution No. 1995 -Is fa hereby modlned to provide that the TIF Plan for TIP District No. 1-19 is approved whathor or not a rodovolopment contract has boon entered between the HRA and Senior Alliance or any other party. 1. The HRA Is authorized to file the TIP Plan together with certified copies of Resolution No. 1995-18 and this resolution with the Wright County Auditor with a request to certify the TIP District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, and to file a copy of the TIF Plan with the State Department of Revenue in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 499.178, Subd. Z. 1995. Approved by the City Council of the City of Monticello this 44th day of April, jb7or ATTEBTt City Administrator 3R — /1 Council Agenda - 4/W95 sB. Consideration of anpHeatioq for carnival license - Monticello Mall Merchants Association. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Ms. Julie Ellis, Promotion Director for the Monticello Mall Merchants Association, has again applied for a license to have Chuck's Amusements operate a carnival at the Monticello Mall parking lot for 13 days, May 18 through May 29. As you may recall, the Monticello Mall has received permission from the City Council to have this same operator conduct a carnival last year, May 29 through June 5, and the year before on May 19 through May 23. City ordinance require that the City Council approve the license for carnivals, circuses, and traveling shows. The Merchants Association is again requesting that the fee established within our ordinance for a carnival at $100 for the first day and $50 per day thereafter be waived. The Merchants Association considers themselves a non-profit organization established for the promotion of the mall and, therefore, should be exempt. The Merchants Association has provided a certificate of insurance document indicating that the carnival operator would have a $1 million liability policy in effect naming both the mall owner and the City as additional insureds. Enclosed with the agenda you will find a listing of the days and hours of operation that the amusement park will be operating during the 13 -day run. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the issuance of a 13 -day carnival license to the Monticello Mall Merchants Association and waive the daily fees by recognizing the Association as a non-profit group. t�W'- i �! .� s - 1..,,.;,_, ( -, (,:. 2. Approve the issuance of the license contingent upon the' s being collected. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff is not aware of this carnival operation causing any problems as far as the city regulations aro concerned the past two years. Since the Council has determined in the past that the Mall Association was a non-profit group, you may want to continue with this understanding and waive the daily license fees. Council Agenda - 4/24/95 City ordinances also require a surety bond to protect the City from any damage that might occur on public property from a carnival operation, but the Council has chosen in the past to also waive this requirement as being unnecessary. Unless the Council knows of some other reason why this carnival may cause a problem, it is recommended the license be issued. D. SUPPORTING DATA-- Copy ATA: Copy of letter requesting license approval; Copy of certificate of insurance from carnival operator. 208 West Sa►erM Street ,moi /conticelkyll Mordkm lo. MN 65382 m.c5Vla To: City of Mont iccllo Date April 18, 1995 From: Julie Ellis4�� , X. Subject Chuck's Amusement Promotionirector In regards to Chuck's Anut,&nient at the Monticello Mall we arc requesting the following for approval. I. Fee to be waived (as has been dune in the hast 1 2. An extension ofdays for carnival to nm from Thursday, Stay 18 to Monday Slav 29 (Memorial Day) with the hours of, Mon.-Thurs. 3 9p.nl Friday 2-1Op.m. Sal. I la.m.-1Op nr Sun noon -9p lit Memorial Day noon to Spit. Chuck's Anrusenkhn will start cleaning and clan ing anytime allci 3 fd1 on Mcnnnial Day if business is slow. They will supply two oulhrnises and take case of the gmlra4e. Theis main big trucks will be parked in the back oflhe ncdl as not to inteilcre with parking spaces out 1Yont. The carnival set-up will be the same as in spring and fall of 94. There is approval from the Skillet Reslawam and the Coumuy (hill regaldinu layout due to customer pnrking and n'allic Ilow. Attached is a Certificate of Insnronce fiom Allied Speciality Insurance. If there me any questions icgiuding this sulyt-cl. please Iccl lice In cull me at 261.8182 'thank you fior your time! ALLIED SPECIALTYINSURANCE, INC. 10451 Gulf Boulevard Troasure Island, Florida 33706 Toll Free 1-800-237-3355 National 1-800-282-6776 Florida Cert IIIcate Number: 00018 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Thl;a certificate neither affirmatively nor negatively amends, extends or alt.,rs the coverage afforded by the pot Icy( les) descrlbed hereon and Is issu,d as a matter of Information and confers no right upon the holder. the pot Icy( les) Identified below by a policy number is In force or. the ,I.atc of rertlflcate Issuance. Insurance is afforded only with respect Ito allose coverages for which a specific limit of liability has been sntured and issubJect to alt terms of the policy having reference thereto. Nothing herein contained shall modify any provision of said pot icy. In the event o1 cancellation of the policy, the company Issuing said pot ic.Y wilt make all reasonable effort to send Notice of Cancellation to the certificate holder at the address shown herein, but the Com any assumes no responsibilities for any mistake or failure to givo Such at Ice. lAny .itl. rest to an occurrene insurance made a part of the policy Includes as a person insured pecce taking place at a CARNIVAL sit, Ik1) the Fair or exhibition association, sponsoring organization or r.ommittee (2) the owner or lessee there of (3) a municlppalitY 9rautinu Ishe Named Insured permission to operate a(n) CARNIVAL, but only ac .•esp,.cts bodily Injury or property damage caused by or :ontribulod Io i.y t.t.e negligence of the Named lnsurwt while acting ill the cuu—e at.ct _,cop,_ of their employment. NAME & ADDRESS OF INSURED ADDITIONAL INSURED: Chuclt's Amusements CITY OF MUN'rICEI.1.0, "ti. BARfcY OLEUTH Northeast h S h eu t .1'I'lp 3330 NAME 6 ADDRESS OF CERTIFICATE HOLDERS PR.thOTION DIRECTOR 20n W. 7rH ST. MOuiICELLO, MN. 55362 DATESS 08/31/5' l0 0'!/0 7-/7v PRIMARY COVERAGE EXCESS COVERAGE COMPANY: T.H.E. Insurance Company ULM97401 PottcyY Numbor: LI All ILITY LIMITS Dodily InJJury h Bodily Injury 6 Blii''U LQQQaQQQi.Qu___ OC1: Propel'tY IJamA7t' I'rnpgl•1y Uamayr 1J.QQQLQQQJQQ--- AGG t__.___.. ^ ... 1-._ e.cr3on-uT--- f:xce,., or-- 1'0 ort Productsl 11NCLUTJEII----__ f o 1 ley per iodi From: 5/12/9`7 0/00/00 0/00/00 To: 5/12/Y6 0/U0/00 0/00/04) a - COM1110ri J 1_1"11 I;ov..age shown heroin appllos onlyY to (hot.v Iteot3 „chvdult•d un or n(I so It to tho policy. This cortlI rate n not valid unlec•s an •4I11at signatut'o appears bolow. (Cop10-; tint Va1,l(1) 1q 1 y� /i���%r rp-t i 1_ if t w : a ti ell 'tar. tial. of Lurt C. o taaua'n�u- fF ? Al IJFD SPECIAI TY INSI IRANCF. INC. -• – -- 36 — Council Agenda - 4/24/96 s. Public hearing on adoution of urouosed assessment roll fpr delinauent utility hills and certification of assessment roll to County Auditor. (R.W., C.3.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is again asked to adopt an assessment roll for utility billing accounts which are delinquent more than 60 days and to certify the assessment roll to the County Auditor for collection on next year's real estate taxes if not paid by November 30, 1995. The delinquent utility accounts that are included with the agenda are accounts that are at least 60 days past due and include all new delinquents from the last time we certified them. In addition to the delinquent amount, the Council also previously approved the establishment of an administrative fee of $25 per account that is added to each delinquent assessment. The amounts shown on the enclosed delinquent utilities list include the additional $25 administration fee for the preparation of the assessment roll. It is recommended that the delinquent accounts be put on an assessment roll for certification in 1996 at an interest rate of 8% as allowed by state statute. As in the past, if any accounts are paid within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll, they can be paid without the additional interest. After 30 days, payments will be charged interest and can be accepted up to November 30, 1995. As you will note, account #00200370000 has a past due balance over $600, and this account is a commercial property. Previously, Council approved disconnection of water service in such a case. The city will be taking action on this in the near future following proper notification to the property owner. )3. ALTERNATP; A_CTjM: j u v 1. Adopt the assessment roll for the delinquent charges as presented. 2. Based on public hearing input, adjust the assessment roil as required. Council Agenda - 4!24/85 C It is staff recommendation that the Council adopt the assessment roll as presented. All of the accounts are at least 60 days past due and have been given proper notice of this assessment hearing and ample opportunity to pay the accounts in full. All utility accounts were notified that there would be an additional $25 administrative fee attached to each outstanding balance if the account was not paid by 4:30 p.m. on April 17, 1995. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution adopting assessment roll; Complete listing of delinquent accounts to be certified. RESOLUTION 95 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for delinquent sewer and water billings and other service charges. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made apart hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the parcels named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in one (1) annual installment payable on or before the first Monday in January 1997 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum Brom the date of the adoption of We assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1998. 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution. 4. The City Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to the county auditor to be extended on the proper tax list of the county, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of April, 1995. Mayor City Administrator 05/18/95 08.08.h6 OTR 6, 19 -CM DELD UTILITY BILLING CERTIFICAT10S WITH LATE CHARGE EklE t Amount 8 P14 6 Proaerty Address APT Custo-*r Na:- Ovr30 03v OvrCO Day Ovr90 Cay Ovr120 Day Late Iota' 4 P& -,t Due Pest Dae Past Due Pest Due Charge r/Ute Charge 0010032010D ISSOICOSSO40 307 RIVER ST W PATTY PG7 RS 53.67 co DO .00 25.00 70.47 00100830000 155010046100 914 RIVER $T W RAC4AEL SMITH 60.56 CD Co Qa 25.00 65.56 00101110000 155010067140 206 RIVER ST E CHNITELLE MITCHELL 31.57 .00 CO .00 25.00 56.98 00101 II= 15W 10067130 211 RIVER $T E ED OPP 80.62 CO .D7 .00 25.00 105.62 00101260000 155015005150 326 RIVER ST E ROW EEGIN 121.47 .00 .00 OD 25.00 186.61 E9 E1 R11"e.. F -i F. iill:. FLE. 00200020000 15MOO124300 1407 HART BLVD MARCIA SWDIN 61.59 .03 .00 .00 25.00 86.59 00200060003 155015022010 1213 HART ELVD STACY SECKINUR 62.14 .07 .00 .00 25.00 67.18 00200370000 155015005010 355 BROADWAY E B-QEAN LA177;GRY 531.39 Co .03 C3 25.03 556.38 00109690000 155010050011 349 BROADWAY V FRED'S AUTO REPAIR 136.75 .00 .00 .00 25.00 161.75 OUM930000 155020005111 1011 BROADWAY W 80HDAN OMYTRYZYN 85.19 .00 .00 DO 25.00 110.19 00201450001 15$010036150 103 BROADWAY E HILOEBRAEB)T INVESTORS 318.19 CD .00 DD 25.00 343.19 00300160000 155060003010 213 NEW ST TOM BITZER 85.40 .00 .DO .03 25.00 110.60 00300370003 15SOI0038050 211 LINT el DAVID A & EHC'kA PiVISSEH 77.16 .03 .00 .00 2$.00 102.16 00300530060 155010051010 125 30 ST W ROBERT BARTHEL 46.60 C3 .00 .CO 25.00 71.60 00300680000 155010027060 303 MIPIESOTA $T KEVIN KENTH C8.67 C3 OD GO 2S.CO 113.67 00300010080 15501003ODSO 318 3RO ST V ROBERT AND YVONNE COX 50.01 .03 .00 C0 25.43 75.81 00300090000 155910070100 300 3RD $T E GERALD SC:SIEBY 58.70 DO CD .03 25.00 03.70 Q0301000OOI 155015035100 424 3RD ST E TERRY MCEACHIRN 31.41 OD .00 .03 25.00 62.67 0050OCDOODO 15501800DO20 3CS 6TH ST E WAYNE COX 01.14 C3 .03 .00 25.00 106.74 00SM490000 155010009050 601 61H ST W NONE FLORELL 61,65 .00 .00 CO 25.00 66.65 00503¢00000 155010075060 1DO 6TH ST V DAIRY QUEEN 391.45 .00 CD .03 15.00 616.45 00540900000 155016001010 210 ITH ST W WITICELLO ML 630.10 CO .00 .0 16,00 655.79 OCUp)103V 155503033403 1400 UDA VAY V RPF,ELT KA72MAREK 31.10 .OJ ,O3 .00 25.07 56.20 006C753003 ISSWO01010 1120 SANDY U KAREN TELEGA-WHALEY 75.33 CD .00 .C3 25.C3 100.13 GC 01720000 155500034703 1323 RIVER $1 V 1 C EV:9OILLE 64,07 .07 .W .03 ?$.CO 09.01 OCS9331C."C3 155013002110 113 HILLCREST RD RICHARD GILOERSLELVt )I.GO 03 .CO C3 15.09 96.68 00)0'0 OtCJ 155500142601 1305 OAXWOOO DR E L 8 W ASSOCIATES 24,10 .0 .03 .03 75.03 54.78 OSDO21000 15S040CD1ICu 111 JERRY LIEFERT U RIWARD L GRWR 00.61 C3 .C7 .00 25.00 IGS.61 OCC0103000 15502,033060 123 MARVIN FIWODD RD imS JOH`" 110.20 .00 co .OD 25.00 135.70 020I050000 155016003160 132 M.$WIN ELWOOD RD TOM GIRO"X 104.78 .0 co .Ga 25.00 129.26 00.03510001 155^_:5034110 229 FNRVIN ELVC0I1 RD min CARTER 66.01 .03 C3 .00 15.03 71.07 070350030 15SO3'.cw0 9 ICs CROC77 CIO 0. Cm= 8 C. Hni;,SN 10.5; C3 C3 GD 15.67 95.54 CC0300000 15`335[36030 III CROCUS LA 91WO LUNWISI E0.52 C3 W .00 25.00 i5.$? 0= 6=0 155031.^-71107 230 WVIN ELM 0 W:ALD VOu9 67.55 .0 GO .U, 25.1] 01.54 CC.:=700 155035M 1110 F26 MAWIN ELWOCO 0 KATIE LAWaENCE 75.¢3 .CD ,0 .0 75.C3 100.50 D4:,:50710ao 155035001121 222 MARVIN ELWOOD RD E_011 8 DEAD[ TORUV-t) 10.11 C7 CO OD 25.07 35.11 00;0 110700 I55Y.5O71130 210 K010 ELVDOO RD CINDY W -LL* 'o..' C7 43 C7 75.00 1113.11 =.^,5130.70 15,035001161 216 WVIV ELWOOD RD LARRY AKD TA7WY KETt LF 59.20 -Co .06 .00 25.00'U.20 0(15140300 I5503103t0i0 143 1300.62 LA 3019 CELLETTE 110.0 Co .00 CD 25.00 155,03 CC:^ai6C"77 155731004010 115 KlCX!N LA KWETH M -URO 1h.53 C7 .03 .60 73.00 9).59 C:^ OD§JO7 1553D =C57 1;7 Ha C ---J LA PAIVIV/41:41IE TQL rKY :5.41 C7 ,03 .0 :5. C7 79.57 077315207 P;',777^71113 9 aX;[,TW CID GILL M CEV Ct1=:3Y 01.E! CJ C3 23.67 1C3.57 C:'0'C507�7 15`7334733¢3 t5 EA LE EIR TE dFIC :.5t C7 0 3 25.0 ¢7.51 Cu.01;000Os 155.73:072163 10 [A',IE, CIN CEV RG;5 05147 C7 C7 0 25.07 119.40 3i"-114020 155016003193 157 RIVERVIEW DR JEN; RIVERtV 07; 210.01 co A 25.07 251.01 OICG S'3?67 15'.016,33110 205 MIS315SILPI 02 K%FHA KCKEC71h 2.C5 .;7 C) OS.C' 25.00 1;'3.69 MY UT 01411CUL0 r 04/18/95 06,08.46 GTR 4, 19x1 DIEU UTILITY BILLING CERTIFICATIONS WITH LAZE CHARGE PU 2 ( Account 1 PID 1 Property Address APT Custaeer Na;x Ovr3O Dar Ovr60 Day Oyr90 Dav Ovr12O Day Late Total 1 Past Due Pvt Due Past Ow Past Due Charga v/tate Charge 01000060000 1550160000$0 117 RIVERVIEW DR LIO:EL CAVIES 48.46 .00 .Qu £3 25.00 73.46 011030BOODO 155045002010 2661 RED OAK CIR MICHAEL HARIER 95,93 .03 .OD .QO 25,00 170,93 01103100000 155045002030 2900 RED OAK CIR DAVID R BOETTCHER 51.64 ,OO OD 04 25.00 76.64 Ot1055T0000 155045004060 28D1 CVJNIEW LA JACK 6 KARA FWSEN 12.09 .00 OD .00 25.00 97.09 0106680000 155059002080 2161 MEADOW LA DENTCN WILLAADER 114.02 .66 .00 00 25.00 159.02 0110701DOCO 155070002100 2527 BRIAR CAKES BLVD DAVID d JAMI SCHWARTZ 12196 .07 .03 CO 25.00 97.96 012000?0000 155500154403 203 KJELLBERG'S PARK L►3WARt1 HCDEL 20.80 C0 .00 GO 25,00 45.60 01200030000 1555001$4403 202 KJELLSERG'S PARK SiHAN%% SAYRE 10.40 .00 .00 .03 75.00 35.40 01200050006 155500154403 705 KJELLBERG'S PARK LOIS 8 RICHARD GILGEN 31,20 .03 .00 .00 25.00 56.20 012C00SOOM 155508154403 211 KJELLBERG'S PARK PAM RICHWINE 31.20 .C7 .0D .00 25.00 55.20 01200510000 i5S500156403 110 KJELLBERG'S PARK A r.C1IMERGER 31,20 .00 .00 C0 25.00 56.20 01200530001 155$00154403 100 KJELLBERG'S PARK KJELLBERG'S INC 10.00 .00 .00 OD ?$.00 35.00 01200634DO0 155540154AD3 2 KALBERG'S PARK JOE 1CCLAY 10.40 .0 co .40 25.00 35.80 01700640000 155500154403 3 KJELLSERG'S PARR STEVE S CLARICE LILKIN; 31.:0 .00 OD .00 25.x0 :6.20 Oi?0071CDOi 155500154403 APT E KJELLBERG'S PARK KJELLBERG'S INC 10.40 .00 DD .00 25.00 35.40 ` 01100190006 155500154403 IT KJELLSERG'S PARK GAIL MOH LER 31.73 .C3 !?a .00 75.00 56.70 01207990000 155500154403 316 KJELLBERG'S PARK ALAN TREPANIER 31.20 .GO .Gil .00 25.00 56.20 017010DOD01 6550156403 117 KJELLEEF.S"S PARK KJELLBERG'S IHC 31.23 C3 CD .03 25.00 56.20 01201110000 155500154403 4% KJELLBERG'S PARK SHERNA SIMCNS 10.40 .CO ,ted .00 25.00 35.40 01701300003 155500156403 SCi KJEILBERG'S PARK STEVE JAMAN 31.20 .W ,QD OO 25.00 56.70 01300050000 155069003050 5090 STARLIA'G DR OEMNIS B SIG JEWETT 69.03 .03 CJ .03 25.00 95.63 01309110000 ISS673003110 1060 HEEON CT LINDA EDEN 46,96 CO co .03 25.00 11.06 0130219x]07 t55073005020 $240 STARLING OR JAMES LEWIS 10.40 C3 co .0 25.07 35.40 01307050000 155076003100 5370 FALCON AVE JILL HAWKIN9 84,60 (D .G3 .07 25.00 109.60 0130330CDOO 155069002010 5040 w1u1 OR PAM 0030(£ MCD .CO CD .00 25.00 64.00 0130319000D 1550690D7020 409 MARLIN DR LAURIE KOEP 43.13 .0 CD .03 75.00 E8.0 90200290200 15501500300 549 1400AY 1 2 INFINITY FINANCIAL 10.40 .00 CJ .00 25.03 35.40 =70010 155015033010 $6: CRTMDWAY E 4 INFINITY FINANCIAL 10.40 G3 G3 .03 75.00 :5140 90500010160 155015032010 119 6114 ST E i INFINITY FINANCIAL 20. CO .63 uJ Cil 25.CJ 45.00 C0 E10200 155015032010 119 41H ST E 2 INFINITY FINANCIAL 20.L0 .OD OD .03 7$.00 45.00 OOSCDOIC30 155015032010 119 iTN ST E 3 LIFINITY FINg,'CIAL 20.00 CO .'O .00 25,00 45,00 COA60010400 155015037310 119 419 $1 E 4 INFINITY FINANCIAL 20.09 .63 GO .03 75.01 45.(0 03501110200 155647000310 $13 1TH ST E PATRICIA S.'lAVELY 10,42 C1 .c3 .CO 25.00 15.40 94501040300 155.170031031 101 71H SI E 0 )ARA OPSAL 11.10 CO G7 C3 75. C3 45.20 Ffr16' TOTALS 161Gi 5030.60 OD a 04» "0*Ciir83► b4lB!!'4t l d%d• �tt1t Ei7D OF REPORT 14441 r a CITY OF w]ITICEtLD Council Agenda • 4/M5 Consideration pf amendmgnj to gon¢ltional nee Dermit allowing a garden center in a B-4 district. Aonlicant. Cedar Street Garden Center. W.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: For the sake of efficiency, the report provided to the Planning Commission is provided to the Council without changes. At a special meeting on April 18,1995, recommend approval of the conditional the amended site plan will improve the facility. D SUPPORTING DATA. the Planning Commission voted to use permit based on the finding that operation and appearance of the Copy of 4118195 Planning Commission agenda supplement. RPR -13-1995 1601 11RC bll Z-= =3Jf r.iad,i4 IryA Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Cj U a 8 A N VLA N N I NO - D E S I G N• Y A a K E T RES K A R C N MEMORANDUM TO: Monticello Planning CoInu didam FROM: DATE: Stephen Guttman 13 April 1993 REL MondoeIln - Color Street Garden Ctsta (Fa medy 'Pair's') FILE NO: 191.07 - 95.05 Background and Reference Cedar Street Garden Ceuta has applied for an smut to a Condidonal Ute Permit originally issuod to ttieir predeoasar 'Fair's Darden Canoe is 1989. The purpose of the ameadmew is to rnlocm rock bins from the Broadway Montage to the northeast emu of the site, cucmtly devoted to c*to= storage 7be rock bhu would be replaced with additional padciog. No other changes are psDI fat this than Ameadmous to Conditional Um Fcmits ate l as if they were new a THMdona. Ana[ygti of ALtema*es Ste PLM gMM The Conditional Use Pem>it granted In 1989 loaded a sodas of fonrtea conditions whim controlled use of the situ. For the pmposa of this review, 1t is atamed that the ptevloaaly established conditions were propmb oomliod with, however an hurpwtioa Amid be made to verify this assumption. Included in these conditions was On agieemem that a portion of the parking area along Broadway Dead not be cubed as tavind is the Zanfog Ordinance, pending fume expanalon of the paddng lot. Alm approved in the odglnal permit cru relid from paving the drive area Serving the mc]r bins. This mild was granted via a vadam ft+Dm the paving standards, with the conditian that no matoma through traffic were to be allowed. 5775 Wayzata Blvd. - State 555 • St. Ltx,is Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595406 -Fax. 595.9837- PPR -13-1995 1601 NAC etc 707 x.x 1..o.v1. This application would fulfill the expectation of the 1989 approval. At this time, paving of the new parking area and completion of the outing should be a .t -:.....r. of the CUP amendment. The traffic pattern for customers, as designed on the site plan, will be to enter froth Cedar Street, and travel either north or east through the parking lot Traffic which travels east would then exit at a sub cat adjacent to the former location of the rock bins. As with the previous permit, a conditim should be attached restricting customer m ffm from the unpaved areas, presuming that the City is willing to allow the trounce of the gravel surfacing in such areas. With regard to the relocation of the rock bias, the previous site plan indicates a six foot high cedar fence or landscape screen from the neighboring properties. The City should review the emsting screening and detenaiae its adequacy to buffer the proposed rock bra use from the adjoining properties. MaLLIME The cu = Garden Center freestanding sign is situated in a non-confomsing lncatien adjacent to the Broadway Suva right of way. The Monticello Zoning Ordinance sequins a se ft for such signs of fittm feet from the property line. Modification of the sign will Merry be proposed by the new openirort to reflect the name change. According to staff' Information, the sign was not granted any special permission to be located within the required sign setback As such, the location of this sign would need to be addressed in order to be able to make a finding that the proposed Conditfoal Use permit will meet the standards of the Zoning Ordinance. a typical fatter in the City's consideration of such Permits. There are three possibilities which the Plaoig Cott fission may wish to consider. First would be a that the sign be relocated to meet the required fifteen foot setback. It is not clear from the site plan, but such a relocation may require the elimimtloa of one of the parking spaces. A second alternative would be consideration of a variance fltom the sign setback requirements. Va>iaaees requite a finding of special condition relating to a a ... ........... '_ physical hardship which would otherwise preclude =Vlkaoe with the pedozmam standards In our quick review of this situation, such a special condition may be difficult to show. A thud alterative would be consideration of amendments to the alp regulations teladria to freestanding sign setbacks. There may be some justWeadon in this alternative in that while freeitanding dans are required to be ser back Men fbet fterm the right of way, buildings can be constructed with a sera saback In this zoning district. Tying the dp setbaclo to building setbacks may be a reasonable approach which the Phoning Cammladoa should di6mm Regardless of the soludon choses, the applicant should be given some direction a the Planning Commission's wishes In this regard. Any applications necessary could be made by the applkmat and considered by the Planning Commission at its near moaiog. PPR-13-1995 1601 NFk o_c »>>c r.a •:c Me Planning C=m= is charged with eoatidamg the following items fn its ccamplation of a Conditional Use Permit application: • )Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan. • The geogmpbfed amt inv ived. • Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is pmposed. • The chasseter of the surrounding area. • The r1...... -,—J need for such use. T3ia area is a part of the extended Casual Business DWdct, and is zonad Bi, ltegioaal Business District Since the an exists on the p, location, little hs>pact is atpected on the surrounding neighborhood. As noted above, the changes to the apemtion should be reviewed as they relate to the immediately adjoining property owners, puticula dy in the adepicy of the screening on the silo. R would be e><pected that a redadian fo the amount of gravel mdace, and more oft street costumer puidng, a aleater cuhx for such padti g should huprM the sae's operation In relation to the neighborhood. Conch"iOn 71a ameadment to the garden cooter Conditional Use Permit is an gVmu nfty to remove an iacompatsble use fkom the Broadway Street ftotBp. In addition, the etpanaion of the aiY-almet yddag should serve to reduce congestion is the area &dug peat seasons of use, and reduce the potemW for adverse impacts from waved arras In and near the Central Business Distict For these reasons, approval of the Conditioasl Use Ftt»t amendment is moommeaded. 'lois tewmmeadatfon Is based upon the Following conditions: 1. The garden canes demosetsata coatpili ace with all previously Imposed oomdCtom of the original CUP issued In 1989. 2. The ares from which the rusk bias are being removed Is to be paved and - n 11 4, per Ordinance requirements for commadal padtfng lou, and per the atpetxatian of the 1989 Permit gvwvaL 3. Tba area surrounding the new rock bio location is detained to be adegmtdy scte=d a preset, or additiortal screening efforts am regnired. 4. The freestanding dp is mads to be confarmfM elther through an ameffimeat to the Ordinance, or relocation of the dp to mea eoanollhtg sathackt. pc: Jeff O'Neill Council Agenda - 4124195 7, _Cdpnsiderption of apurQvfna a Joint resolution aourovina annexation of the 160 -acre Klein Farm site. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Items 7, 8, and 9 are inter -related, with annexation of the Klein property to occur contingent on approval and execution of the development agreement and approval of the final plat of the Klein Farms subdivision. According to the urbanization agreement between the City and Township, City action regarding an annexation request must occur only after the Township has made a recommendation regarding the request. At the Township Board meeting held on April 10, 1995, the Township voted to sign the joint resolution supporting annexation. This action is consistent with previous commitments, and thus paves the way for annexation to occur. Motion to adopt a resolution approving a joint resolution approving annexation of the 160 -acre Klein Farm site. S A 61 Under this alternative, the resolution will be sent to the Municipal Board for processing. 2. Motion to deny adoption of the resolution. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative Ml. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution for adoption. IN THE MATTER OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT RESOLUTION FOR ORDERLY ANNEXATION BETWEEN THE TOWN OF MONTICELLO AND THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA PURSUANT TO MIIVIVESOTA STATUTES 414.0325, SUBD. 1 TO: Minnesota Municipal Board 165 Metro Square Building St. Paul, MN 55101 The Town of Monticello and the City of Monticello hereby jointly agree that the joint resolution between the Town of Monticello and the City of Monticello designating an area for orderly annexation dated December 8, 1972, be amended to include the following: Both the Town and the City agree that no alteration of the stated boundaries of this agreement is appropriate. Furthermore, both parties agree that no consideration by the Board is necessary. Upon receipt of this resolution, We Municipal Buard may review mrd comment but shall, within 30 days, order the annexation of the following -described property in accordance with the terms of the joint resolution. Property known as the Mein Farm: The North Half of Southeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. Containing 80.33 acres, more or less. Subject to that part taken for County Road No. 117, also known as N.E. Edmonson Avenue, over and across the West 33 feet thereof. Also subject to that part taken for N.E. Fallon Avenue over and across the East 33 feet thereof. Also subject to an easement to United Power Association (as described elsewhere hereon). Also subject to an casement to Northern Natural Gas Company (as described elsewhere hereon). The South Half of Southeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. Containing 80.42 acres, more or less. Subject to that part taken for County Road No. 117, also known as N.E. Edmonson Avenue, over and across the West 33 feet thereof. Also subject to that part taken for N.E. Fallon Avenue over and across the East 33 feet thereof. Also subject to an easement to United Power Association over and across the South 60 feet thereof Also subject to an easement to United Power Association (as described elsewhere hereon). Also subject to an casement to Northern Natural Gas Company (as described elsewhere hereon). Also subject to an easement to (Amoco) American Oil Company las described elsewhere hereon). Also subject to an easement to Northern States Power Company (as described elsewhere hereon). KLEINANN.AMD: 4095 0Page 1 Approved by the City of Monticello this _ day of 19_. City Administrator Mayor Approved by the Town of Monticello tbij/041y of 4 -Q oam Chair Town Clerk D KLE[NANN.AMD: 4/M Page 2 Council Agenda - 4/24/95 Consideration of anwovina final plat and adootina develoument agreement - Klein Farms. W.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Attached you will find a draft development agreement along with a finance plan for the Klein Farms development The development agreement has been modeled after the Cardinal Hills agreement. Changes to the agreement that pertain to the Klein Farms are outlined in bold face type. When you review the agreement, pay special attention to these sections. The final plat design is consistent with the preliminary plat previously approved by the City Council. Minor adjustrnenta need to be made prior to placement of City signatures on the plat. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the final plat and adopt the development agreement for the Klein Farms residential subdivision contingent on review and approval of the development agreement by the City Attorney and contingent on approval of the final plat by the City Engineer. _4,J ! Ya T—, 1,..:t...- w•'•• ,^• P f,' L-- R ..e /ir+.•.di�� This alternative paves the way for awarding the public improvement project. 2. Motion to deny approval of the final plat and development agreement. This alternative should be selected if sections of the development agreement are found to be unacoeptable. C. STAFF RECOMh%ZNDATION: Staff recommends that Council review the bold sections of the agreement in detail. I will also be reviewing important sections of the document, along with the finance plan, at the meeting on Monday. If Council is satisfied with the terms, then alternative 01 should be selected. Copy of development agreement; The final plat will be provided at the meeting. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT CITY/DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS MIEN N FARMS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 24th day of April, 1895, by and between Tony Emmerich , referred to herein as "Developer," and the City of Monticello, a municipal corporation in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "City"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner and developer of a parcel or parcels of land described in Exhibit A ("Subject Property"), which is proposed to be developed bearing the plat name Klein Farms; and WHEREAS, the City requires that certain public improvements be installed by the City at the sole expense of the Developer to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, streets, and site grading, (hereinafter referred to as "Petition Items"); and WHEREAS, the City requires that certain on- and o8=aite improvements be installed by the Developer at the sole cost of the Developer to serve the subject property consisting of boulevard sod or seeding or landscaping, hereafter referred to as "Developer Items"); and WHEREAS, the City and Developer are willing to agree to the platting and development of the Subject Property under the terms and conditions as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AND HEREIN MUTUALLY AGREED, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties, agreeing to be mutually bound, agree as follows: 1. Reauest for Plat Aacmval. The Developer hereby petitions the City to approve the platting of the Subject Property described on Exhibit A to be known as The Mein Farms Phase 1, under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. Conditions of Plat Anuroval. The City agrees to approve the plat on the following conditions: A. The Developer executes this Agreement and complies with the terms contained herein; and B. The Developer provides the necessary letter of credit required by this Agreement in order to assure payment of special KLEIN.AGR: 4/18/95 Page 1Q4 assessments to be levied against the Subject Property, pay associated costs of the development, and guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement; and C. The Developer obtains approval of the final plat in accordance with City rules and ordinances and files the plat in the office of the Wright County Recorder no later than August 4 1896. D. The Developer executes the disbursement agreement governing payment of site grading expenses. E. The City and Developer shall reconcile City expenses and Developer deposits relating to plat review and EAW preparation. If City expenses exceed Developer deposits, the Developer shall deposit Mande with the City accordingly. If Developer deposits exceed City expenses, the City shall return the difference to the Developer accordingly. The and Density. The plat shall show the following; A maximum of 70 single family residential lots; Three outlots, A, B, and C to be platted at some point in the future in conjunction with a Residential Planned Unit Development (R -PUD); Outlot D to be platted in future for development of 29 single family lots; Outlot E to be provided to the City for pathway purposes; All necessary street and roadway easements. The plat shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and, if applicable, the Wright County Traffic Engineer. The Developer agrees to develop Lots in a manner that places the garage on the side of the property adjacent to the trail located at Outlot D. No building permits shall be issued for site plans that do not meet this requirement Grading of the troWwalkway easements shall be performed by the City and paid for by the Developer in conjunction with development of phase U of the Klein Farms or in conjunction with development of Outlots B or C. Development of Outlots C. D, and E shall be subject to the Residential Planned Unit Development procem installation of required landscaping as identified by the city Ordinance. including modifications as identified via the R•PUD process. shall be installed in conjunction with R•PUD development KLEIN.AGR: 4/18/98 Page 2 a g Effect of Plat Anuroval. For three (3) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City's comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development, density, or lot size of the subject property, unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's comprehensive plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement as it pertains to the subject property and may require submission of a new plat. 8. Exhibit B Petitions Items (City -Installed Items). Upon compliance with the conditions of paragraph 2, the Developer shall be deemed to have petitioned the City to design, construct, and install those Petition Items described on Exhibit B attached hereto. The plans and specifications for said items shall be kept on file in the offices of the City and are incorporated by reference herein. Provided the Developer is not otherwise in default under this Agreement, the City agrees to construct and install Esbibit B Petition Items subject to the following terms and conditions. A. The City shall commence work on Exhibit B Petition Items within 30 days of the date a contract to perform the public improvement is awarded by the City, and shall use its beat efforts to complete the improvements in a prompt manner, subject to delays beyond its control. B. The Developer hereby waives its right to notice and public hearing to be held on said Exhibit B Petition Items pursuant to M.S. 4429.031 and 4428.081. C. Except for the cost of site grading as identified under Article e. the Developer agrees that the coat of Exhibit B Petition Items shall be specially assessed against the Subject Property in accordance with the City's special assessment policy, It being acknowledged by the Developer that the Subject Property to the sole benefited property from the proposed Exhibit B Petition Items and that, but for the Developer's project, the City would not construct said public improvements. D. The Developer acknowledges that the estimated costs of the improvements hereinabove described are for construction and for engineering, planning. capitalized interest, bonding costs, legal, and KLEIN.AGR: 4/18/88 Page 3 E) other contingencies for a total estimated cost of The Developer understands that this is an estimate only and that the actual figure may be higher or lower, depending on various tactors Nothing contained herein shall prevent the City dram assessing a higher or lower figure if found necessary and appropriate by the City based on actual cost disbursements. E. The assessment shall be deemed adopted by the City on the date that construction is commenced The assessments shall be assessed against lots on the plat in accordance with the finance plat exhibit which prorates the coat of petition items against lots based on acreage served. The assessment shall be paid over a ten- year payment without deferment, together with interest at a rate set by the City. Nothing contained herein shall prevent the Developer from prepaying the assessments in whole or in part. F. Assessments as to each lot, including principal and interest, shall be paid in full at the time the lot is conveyed to a subsequent purchaser, at which time the City shall release the assessment as to that specific lot. G. The Developer hereby waives all rights of appeal that it has by virtue of Minnesota Statutes 4489.081 or otherwise to challenge the amount or validity of amounts, or the procedure used by the City in levying the assessment, the benefit to the Subject Property or lack thereof by virtue of the improvements, or any other defense available to the Developer either at law or equity to the assessment of the Subject Property as contemplated herein. The Developer hereby releases the City, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all liability related to or arising out of the levying of said assessment EL Nothing contained herein shall prevent the City hvm assessing the Subject Property for public improvements other than those specifically described within this Agreement, all as provided by Minnesota law. L Any Brading expenses not paid via the disbursement agreement shall be Incorporated into the project costs and assessed accordingly. XLEINAGfi 4/18!98 Page 4 6 Grading and Drainaee Plan - (City -Installed Items). Upon compliance with the conditions of paragraph 2 and provided the Developer is not otherwise in default under this agreement, the Developer requests and the City agrees to provide initial site grading for the plat in accordance with the grading and drainage plan on file in the offices of the City, the terms of which are herein incorporated by reference, subject to the following terms and conditions: A. All costs and expenses incurred by the City for initial site grading in accordance with the grading and drainage plan, including grading of the trail/walkway easements described in paragraph 3, shall be paid by the Developer as governed by the disbursement agreement attached as Exhibit B. Through completion of initial site grading, any drainage, flooding, and/or property damage or personal injury on adjacent properties resulting from development of the Subject Property shall be the responsibility of the City, including total costs of correction and compensation to those properties affected. The City agrees to indemnify and hold the Developer harmless from any such claims. C. After initial site grading has been completed, responsibility for drainage, flooding, or adjacent property damage or personal injury shall be the responsibility of the Developer, including total cost of correction and compensation to those properties affected. The Developer agrees to indemnity and hold the City harmless from any such claims. D. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if, in the opinion of the City Engineer, they are necessary to prevent damage to adjacent properties or to prevent unreasonable erosion. The Developer shall comply with any such additional drainage and erosion control plane and with any such additional instructions it receives from the City. All areas disturbed by the excavation and baddilling operation shall be reseeded forthwith by the Developer after the completion of the work in that area Seed shall be rye grans or other fast-growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seed KLEIN.AG& 4/19/95 Page 6 9 areas shall be mulched and disc -anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. Exhibit C Develooer Items (Developer- Installed Items). The Developer shall be responsible for the construction, installation, and payment of the improvements described on Exhibit C attached hereto. Except for unavoidable delays, the Developer shall complete construction and/or installation of these items no later than September 16, 1996, subject to the following terms and conditions: A. The City shall install sod on a portion of the boulevard along the perimeter of the curb as outlined in the plan specifications. The Developer shall sod or seed other boulevard areas as required by the City Engineer to control erosion. Maintenance of the grass in the boulevard area shall be the responsibility of the Developer. B. Private Lawns. Sodding and seeding of yard areas within the plat shall be the responsibility of the property owner. C. Tyree Planting. The Development is subject to tree planting requirements as identified in the city ordinance as follows. For lots with a single road frontage, two trees shall be planted in the Front yard For lots with road frontage on two sides, at least two trees shall be planted in the front yard and two more in the back or side yard that has road frontage. Trees shall be planted on individual lots after a building permit has been issued and before issuance of the occupancy permit This requirement shall not apply to homes that are constructed and otherwise eligible for certificates of occupancy between the months of November and April or &am July 1 through August lb. 1n such circumstances, the builder shall establish a cash escrow fund with the City in an amount acceptable to the City to ensure compliance with this provision prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Wawa tvn . The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of one (1) year after its completion and acceptance by the City. All trees purchased by the Developer shall be warranted by the supplier fbr e period of twelve (12) months. The Developer shall assign said warranties to the City following the purchase thereof. The KLEIN.AGR: 4/18/96 Page 6 0 warranties and securities required by this paragraph shall terminate as to each parcel at the time of conveyance of said parcel to a bona fide purchaser. 8. License The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers, and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all necessary work and/or inspections deemed appropriate by the City during the grading and landscaping phase, installation of Exhibit B Petition Items by the City, Exhibit C Developer Items, and construction of single family residences by builders. 10. Ownership of Improvements. Upon the completion of the work and construction required to be done by this Agreement, Exhibit B Petition Items lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. 11. Per -Acre Trunk Sanitaxy SariSewer. Water Main. Storm Sewer Service Assessments. The Developer agrees that in addition to responsibility for all public improvements described herein, the Developer shall be required to pay $1,Sb11/acre charge for trunk sanitary sewer service, $828/acre for trunk water main service, and $1AWacre for trunk storm sewer service. These fees shall be applied immediately as an assessment against Phase I residential Iota For the fees pertaining to the outlots, kept for Outlot D (trail), the fees need not be paid immediately; however, the fee amounts are subject to change and shall be applied as an assessment at the time of final platting. The trunk service tees associated with each lot are identified in the finance plan, Exhibit The Developer hereby waives all rights of appeal that it has by virtue of Minnesota Statutes ¢428.081 or otherwise to challenge the amount or validity of amounts or the procedure used by the City in levying the trunk service assessments, the benefit to the Subject Property or tack thereof by virtue of the improvements, or any other defense available to the Developer either at law or equity to the assessment of the Subject Property as contemplated herein. The Developer hereby releases the City, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all liability related to or arising out of the levying of said assessment. 12. &ecarity for Improvements As and for security for the payment of labor and materials required under the terms of this Agreement, partial security for the estimated unpaid assessments contemplated herein, and to ensure compLance IO.EIN.ACB: 4/18/88 Page 7 CS& with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit to be issued by a financial institution acceptable to the City. The letter of credit ahall remain in full force and effect until released as provided herein. In the event the letter of credit must be renewed on an annual basis, the Developer shall cause the financial institution issuing the letter of credit to advise the City no less than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the stated renewal date that the bank will renew the letter of credit under the same terms and conditions. In the event the City does not receive such assurances from the bank within sixty (60) days of the date of its renewal date, such occurrence shall constitute an event of default entitling the City to avail itself of the rbmedies provided in paragraph M In accordance with paragraph 5. on or before the date of expiration of the contract signing period, the Developer shall provide the City with an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the City in the amount of Dollars, which amount represents 60 percent of the estimated total cost to construct and install Exhibit B Petition Items, which shall be specially assessed against the entire plat as provided in paragraph tf. If any installment of special assessments as to any lot is not paid in fall when due, which occurrence shall constitute an event of default, In addition to any other remedies it may have, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay the balance due on the delinquent installment. With City approval, provided the Developer Is not otherwise in default, the letter of credit may be written down from time to time. The City Ad—in' trator shall determine, in his sole discretion, the amount of the reduction in the letter of credit, if any, based on his assessment of the finandal risk to the City. 13. Surety Defidencv. In the event that any letter of credit referred to herein is ever utilized and found to be deficient in amount to pay or reimburse the City in total as required herein, the Developer agrees that upon being notified by the City, the Developer will pay the deficient amount within thirty (30) days of notification of the deficient amount. Failure to reimburse the City shall constitute an event of default entitling the City to avail itself to any and all remedies provided under this Agreement. ii3.EIN.AGR: 411&95 Page a 6) 14. Resoonsibility for Costa. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costa incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the approval and/or development of the plat, including, but not limited to, legal, planning, engineering, inspections during development, the preparation of this contract, and in enforcing the provisions of this Agreement, including reasonable attorneys fees and costa incurred by the City. B. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. C. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and/or third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred to public or private property or injury to persons resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costa, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. This indemnification shall not extend to costs attributable to the City's own negligence or that of its agents or employees. D. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all damage to property of the City incurred in connection with the Exhibit C Developer Items performed by the Developer. 16. Eventa of Default. The following shall be "Events of Default" under this Agreement, and the term 'Event of Default" shall mean, whenever it is used in this Agreement (unless the context otherwise provides), any one or more of the following events: A. Failure by the Developer to observe and substantially perform any covenant, condition, obligation, or agreement on its part to be observed or performed hereunder, afar written notice to the Developer as provided in this Agreement. B. If the Developer shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, or shall file a petition in bankruptcy, or shall make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or shall consent to the appointment of a receiver of itself or of the while or any substantial part of the Property. C. If the Developer shall file a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws. KLEIN.AGA: 4/18196 Page 9(®!) D. The Developer fails to provide the letter of credit required by paragraph 12, fails to pay any special assessment when due for Exhibit B City Petition Items, fails to pay bills for initial site grading expenses when due, or fails to commence, complete, and pay for Exhibit C Developer -Installed Items as provided by this Agreement The Developer shall, atter commencement of the Exhibit C Developer Items, abandon or substantially suspend construction work, and such act or actions is not due to unavoidable delays, and any such default, violation, abandonment, or suspension shall not be cured, ended, or remedied within the time provided in this Agreement. Any other occurrence defined as an event of default within this Agreement. 16. jLotiLM: Rgmp¢iga on Default Whenever any event of default occurs, the City shall give written notice of the event of default to the Developer by United States mail to the Developer at its last known address. If the Developer fails to cure the event of default within thirty (30) days of the date of mailed notice, in addition to any other remedy provided in this Agreement and without waiver of any such right, the City may avail itself of any or all of the following remedies: A. Draw down on the letter of credit; B. Halt all plat development work and construction, including, but not limited to, release of lots upon sale, the issuance of building permits or certificates of completion, until such time as the event of default is cured; C. Apply to a Court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin continuation of the event of default; D. Perform the work or obligation required of the Developer. In the event the City acts to perform the work obligation, the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, or the City may, at its option, draw on the appropriate letter of credit. 17. Clean Un. Dovoloper shall maintain streets in a maanor consistent with the erosion control policy for the City. The City shall promptly dean debris &am city streets and from the plat any soil, earth, or debris resulting Brom construction work pertbrsned by or on behalf of the City. KLEINAG& a M95 Page 10 9 18. Park Dedication. The park dedication land area for the Klein Farms development north of School Boulevard is 8 acres. It is anticipated that the 8 -acre site shall be located south of School Boulevard and combined with the S. acre park dedication area required with development of the south 80 acres. The Developer shall provide the City with a warranty deed for the 18 -acre park site to satisfy park dedication requirements for both the north 80•acre site and the south 80- acre site at a location mutually agreed upon by the City and the Developer. It is understood that the final boundaries of the park site are subject to change in conjunction with platting of the southerly 80 -acre site. The City agrees to withhold development of the park site for a period of five years to provide the Developer with time necessary to incorporate the future park area with the final design of the subdivision south of School Boulevard. At such time that the platting of the area south of School Boulevard is complete and the final location and configuration of the park is determined. the City shall return the warranty deed and accept the platted park land accordingly. 19. Outlot D (trail). At no charge to the City, the Developer shall provide the City clear title to Oudot A as identified on Exhibit A by August 15, 1994. Failure to provide the title by this date constitutes an event of default. 20. In conjunction with execution of the development agreement, the Developer shall provide the City with funds in the amount of which represents the Mein Farms' share of the cost of water main improvements in place along Fallon Avenue which were originally funded by the Monticello School District. The City shall pass this revenue to the Monticello School District. 21. The Klein Farms' finance plan includes an assessment for future reconstruction of Fallon Avenue. It is understood that the assessment amount represents the Klein Farms' share of the cost of a future project. The amount identified in the finance plan represents 20 percent of the total estimated Fallon Avenue reconstruction costs for the Klein Farms Fallon Avenue frontage. The Developer hereby waives all rights of appeal that it has by virtue of Minnesota Statutes 4489.081 or otherwise to challenge the amount or validity of amounts or the procedure used by the City in levying the Fallon Avenue assessment, the benefit to the Subject Property or lack thereof by virtue of the Improvements. or any other defense available to the Developer either at law or equity to the assessment of KLEW.AGR: 4/18198 Page 11 the Subdect Property as contemplated herein. The Developer hereby releases the City, its ofScers, agents, and employees from any and all liability related to or arising out of the levying of said assessment. 22. In the event the Developer fails to satisfy the conditions of paragraph 2 by May 1, 1998, which , —�.,, . .,j shall constitute an event of default. the City shall retain all funds on deposit with the City covering feasibility study and plan preparation expenses and may, at its option. thereafter declare the within agreement to be null and void, at which time all further obligations of either party pursuant to this Agreement shall terminate. In the event the Developer satisfies the conditions of paragraph 2 by May 1. 1998, the City shall return to the Developer !bads deposited with the City by the Developer to cover City expenses associated with preparation of the feasibility study and plans and specifications. Said expenses shall then be incorporated into the improvement costs and assessed accordingly. 23. Miscellaneous. A. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors or assigns, as the case may be. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against any party under this Agreement C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. D. So long as the City uses its best efforts to construct the Exhibit B Petition items, the Developer shall have no cause of action for damages attributable to delays in the construction and completion of said Petition Items. E. No one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until sanitary sewer and water lines have been installed, hooked up, tested, and approved by the City. and until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surthce. F. The action or inaction of the City as to the exercise of any of its rights or remedies upon an event of default shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement as KLEINAG&- 4/18/98 Page 12 D 1 to future events of default. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties, and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement Shall not be a waiver or release as to any event of default. G. Future residents of the plat shall not be deemed to be third - party beneficiaries of this Agreement. H. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title of the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Agreement, at the Developer's request the City will execute and deliver to the Developer a release which shall be in recordable form- Both orm Both parties to this Agreement acknowledge that they have been represented by counsel, or are aware of their right to counsel, and have entered into this Agreement freely and voluntarily. KLEIN.AGIi: 4118/98 Page 13 E*�-Q v M Total Project Cost Minus Non -Petition Items Site grading - including School Boulevard City -Installed Petition Items Klein Farms Phase I Sanitary sewer Water main Storm sewer Road/curb and gutter Total est. construction cost of petition items LEAF at 28% Total estimated cost of petition itema Letter of credit requirement at 60% KLEINA(lR 4/18/98 ES>SmIT C DEVELOPER ITElIiS Stein Farms Boulevard Seed/Sod Tree Planting XLEINAafi 4/1&95 Pepe 15 Q O Council Agenda - 4/2495 9. C9ngideration of et resolutiop aopenting bids and awarding contract - Klein Farms. Prosect 95-02C. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This item should be considered if Council has approved items 08 and #9. Following is a summary of the bid tabulation as prepared by the City Engineer. Bids were received and opened on Friday, April 7, 1995, at 10 a.m. at city hall. Thirteen responsible bids were received ranging from $1,097,583 to $1,403,905. The engineer's estimate for the project was $1,097,582, and the feasibility report construction cost was $1,174,384. The low bid was submitted by Ryan Contracting, Inc. Ryan Contracting has worked on City projects in the past and has been found to be a responsible contractor. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt a resolution accepting bids and awarding the project to Ryan Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $1,097,583. t'S sn` This alternative should be selected if Council has approved items #8 and #9 and if Council is comfortable with selecting Ryan Contracting. 2. Motion to deny adoption of the resolution. 3. Motion to table adoption of the resolution. This alternative should be selected if items #8 and 09 are tabled. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative H. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution for adoption. 10 Council Agenda - 4/24/95 1e- C&&eidprationgf approving development amreement and final plat of Cardinal Hills. phase V. (J.O.) X REFERENCE AND BACKGROUV: Attached you will find a draft development agreement, and enclosed is the final plat. The development agreement is nearly identical to agreements governing previous phases of the Cardinal Hills development. A provision requiring two trees on double-fironting lots has been added. &,—ALTERNATWE ACTIONS: Motion to approve the development agreement and final plat of Cardinal Hills, phase V, contingent on final review of the development agreement and plat by the City Attorney and City Engineer. Motion to deny approval of the development agreement and final plat. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The development agreements governing previous phases of the Cardinal Hills development appear to make a good model for governing phase V. Therefore, City staff recommends alternative N1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of development a&reement; Copy of final plat. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT CITY/DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPHOVEMEPM CARDINAL HII.IPHASE V THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 24th day of April, 1895, by and between Value Plus Homes of Monticello, Inc., referred to herein as "Developer," and the City of Monticello, a municipal corporation in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as 'City"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the fee owner and developer of a parcel or parcels of land described in Exhibit A ("Subject Property"), which is proposed to be developed bearing the plat name Cardinal Hills Phase V; and WHEREAS, the City requires that certain public improvements be installed by City at the sole expense of Developer to serve the subject property including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, streets, and site grading, (hereinafter referred to as 'Petition Items"% and WHEREAS, the City requires that certain on- and off-site improvements be installed by the Developer at the sole cost of Developer to serve the subject property consisting of boulevard sod or seeding or landscaping, hereafter referred to as "Developer Items"); and WHEREAS, City and Developer are willing to agree to the platting and development of the Subject Property under the terms and conditions as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AND HEREIN MUTUALLY AGREED, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties, agreeing to be mutually bound, agree as follows: Reauest for Plat Approval. Developer hereby petitions City to approve the platting of the Subject Property described on Exhibit A to be known as Cardinal HWs Phase V. under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City agrees to approve the plat on the following conditions: (a) The Developer executes oris Agreement and complies with the terms contained herein; and (b) The Developer provides t w necessary letters of credit required by this Agreement in order to assure payment of special CARDVAGR: 4/21195 Page 9 assessments to be levied against the Subject Property, pay associated costs of the development, and guarantee compliance with the terns of this Agreement; and (c) The Developer obtains approval of the final plat in accordance with City rules and ordinances and files the plat in the office of the Wright County Recorder no later than 1995. 3. Use and Dgnsity. The plat shall allow a maximum of 34 single family residential lots. The plat must show all necessary street and roadway easements and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and, if applicable, the Wright County Traffic Engineer. 4. Effect of Plat Auuroval. For three (3) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City's comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development, density, or lot size of the subject property, unless required by stats or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's comprehensive plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement as it pertains to the subject property and may require submission of a new plat. 5. Exhibit B Petitions Items (City -Installed Items). Upon compliance with the conditions of paragraph 2, Developer shall be deemed to have petitioned City to design, construct, and install those Petition Items described on Exhibit B attached hereto. The plans and specifications for said items shall be kept on file in the offices of the City and are incorporated by reference herein. Provided the Developer is not otherwise in default under this Agreement, City agrees to construct and install Exhibit B Petition Items subject to the following terms and conditions: (a) City shall commence work on Exhibit B Petition Items within 30 days of the date a contract to perform the public improvement is awarded by City, and shall use its beat efforts to complete the improvements in a prompt manner, subject to delays beyond its control. (b) Developer hereby waives its eight to notice and public hearing to be held on said Exhibit B Petition Items pursuant to M.S. §429.031 and 0429.061. CARDVAGR: 4/21/98 Page 2/® (c) Except for the cost of site grading as identified under Article 6, Developer agrees that the cost of Exhibit B Petition Items shall be specially assessed against the Subject Property in accordance with City's special assessment policy, it being acknowledged by Developer that the Subject Property is the sole benefited property, from the proposed Exhibit B Petition Items and that, but for the Developer's project, City would not construct said public improvements. (d) Developer acknowledges that the estimated costa of the improvements hereinabove described are $ for construction and $ for engineering, planning, capitalized interest, bonding costa, legal and other contingencies for a total estimated cost of $ Developer understands that this is an estimate only and that the actual figure may be higher or lower, depending on various factors. Nothing contained herein shall prevent City from assessing a higher or lower figure if found necessary and appropriate by City based on actual cost disbursements. (e) The assessment shall be deemed adopted by City on the date that construction is commenced. The assessments shall be assessed equally against each lot in the plat. The assessment shall be paid over a five-year payment without deferment, together with interest at a rate set by City. Nothing contained herein shall prevent the Developer from prepaying the assessments in whole or in part. (f) Assessments as to each lot, including principal and interest, shall be paid in Hill at the time the lot is conveyed to a subsequent purchaser, at which time the City shall release the assessment as to that specific lot. In addition, Developer shall pay to the City at the same time an amount equal to one-half of the assessment for the lot to be conveyed. This additional amount paid shall be maintained in a separate surplus Hmd by City. Amounts held in the surplus find shall be released to pay assessments against the remaining lots at such time as the accumulated find bala m is equal to the total combined balance of assessments against all remaining assessed lots. (g) Developer hereby waives all rights of appeal that it has by virtue of Minnesota Statutes ¢429.081 or otherwise to challenge the amount or validity of amounts or the procedure used by the City in levying the assessment, the benefit to the Subject Property or lack thereof by virtue of the improvements or any other defense available to Developer either at law or equity to the assessment of the Subject Property as contemplated herein. CARDVAGR: 4/21198 Pap 3 0- Developer hereby releases the City, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all liability related to or arising out of the levying of said assessment. (h) Nothing contained herein shall prevent City from assessing the Subject Property for public improvements other than those specifically described within this Agreement, all as provided by Minnesota law. 6. Grading and Drainage Plan - (City -Installed Iteme2. Upon compliance with the conditions of paragraph 2 and provided the Developer is not otherwise in default under this agreement, Developer requests and City agrees to provide initial site grading for the plat in accordance with the grading and drainage plan on file in the offices of the City, the terms of which are herein incorporated by reference, subject to the following terms and conditions: (a) All costs and expenses incurred by City for initial site grading in accordance with the grading and drainage plan shall be paid by Developer. City shall provide copies of invoices for said expenses to Developer who shall remit the necessary amounts to City within thirty (30) days of receipt. (b) Through completion of initial site grading, any drainage, flooding, and/or property damage or personal injury on adjacent properties resulting from development of the Subject Property shall be the responsibility of the City, including total costs of correction and compensation to those properties affected. City agrees to indemnify and hold Developer harmless from any such claims. (c) After initial site grading has been completed, responsibility for drainage, flooding, or adjacent property damage or personal injury shall be the responsibility of Developer, including total cost of correction and compensation to those properties affected. Developer agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless Brom any such claims. (d) The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if, in the opinion of the City Engineer, they are necessary to prevent damage to adjacent properties or to prevent unreasonable erosion. The Developer shall comply with any such additional drainage and erosion control plans and with any such additional instructions it receives flrom the City. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operation shall be reseeded forthwith by Developer after the completion of the work in that area. Seed shall be rye grass or other fast- growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide a CARDVAGR: 4/21M5 Pageeo D temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seed areas shall be mulched and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. Exhibit C Develooer Items (Developer -Installed Items).. The Developer shall be responsible for the construction, installation, and payment of the improvements described on Exhibit C attached hereto. Except for unavoidable delays, Developer shall complete construction and/or installation of these items no later than September 15, 1995, subject to the following terms and conditions: A. The City shall install sod on a portion of the boulevard along the perimeter of the curb as outlined in the plan specifications. The Developer shall sod or seed other boulevard areas as required by the City Engineer to control erosion. Maintenance of the grass in the boulevard area shall be the responsibility of the Developer. B. Private Lawns. Sodding and seeding of yard areas within the plat shall be the responsibility of the property owner. Tree Planting. The Development is subject to tree planting requirements as identified in the city ordinance as follows. For lots with a single road frontage, two trees shall be planted in the front yard. For lots with road frontage on two sides, at least two trees shall be planted in the front yard and two more in the back or side yard that has road frontage. Trees shall be planted on individual lots atter a building permit has been issued and before issuance of the occupancy permit. This requirement shall not apply to homes that are constructed and otherwise eligible for certificates of occupancy between the months of November and April or from July 1 through August 15. In such circumstances, the builder shall establish a cash escrow fund with the City in an amount acceptable to the City to ensure compliance with this provision prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Trees shall be planted on individual lots after a building permit has been issued and before issuance of the occupancy permit. This requirement shall not apply to homes that aro constructed and otherwise eligible for certificates of occupaacy between the months of November and April or from July 1 through August 15. In such circumstances, Developer shall establish a rash escrow fund with City in an amount acceptable to City to insure compliance with this provision prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. CARDVACR: 4/21/98 Page 50 8. Warranty. The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of one (1) year after its completion and acceptance by the City. All trees purchased by Developer shall be warranted by the supplier for a period of twelve (12) months. Developer shall assign said warranties to City following the purchase thereof. The warranties and securities required by this paragraph shall terminate as to each parcel at the time of conveyance of said parcel to a bona fide purchaser. 9. License Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers, and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all necessary work and/or inspections deemed appropriate by the City during the grading and landscaping phase, installation of Exhibit B Petition Items by City, Exhibit C Developer Items, and construction of single family residences by Developer. 10. Ownership of Immovemgnts. Upon the completion of the work and construction required to be done by this Agreement, Exhibit B Petition Items lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. �J-T /iWOM�?rFTi.�L'� The Developer agrees that in addition to responsibility for ell public improvements described herein, Developer shall be required to pay $500 per residential lot as and for a trunk sewer fee. Payment of the $500 fee shall be made concurrently with application for a building permit. 12. Security for Imurgvements. As and for security for the payment of labor and materials required under the terms of this Agreement, partial security for the estimated unpaid assessments contemplated herein, and to insure compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Developer shall ihrrnish the City with three (9) irrevocable lettere of credit to be issued by a financial institution acceptable to City. All three letters of credit shall remain in hill force and effect until released as provided herein. In the event the letters of credit must be renewed on an annual basis, Developer shall cause the financial institution issuing the letter of credit to advise the City no less than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the stated renewal date that the bank will renew the letter of credit under the same terms and conditions. In the event City does not receive such assurances from the bank within sixty (60) days of the date of its renewal date, such occurrence shall constitute an event of default entitling the City to avail itself of the remedies provided in paragraph 16. CARDVAGR: 4/21/1)5 Page 60 (a) Letter of Credit #1. City acknowledges receipt of a letter of credit in the amount of $13,000 to be utilized for all expenses incurred by City associated with preparation of plans and specifications for construction and installation of Exhibit B Petition Items. In the event the Developer fails to satisfy the conditions of paragraph 2 by , 1995, which occurrence shall constitute an event of default, City may draw down on Letter of Credit #1 to reimburse City for said expenses and may, at its option, thereafter declare the within agreement to be null and void, at which time all further obligations of either party pursuant to this Agreement shall terminate. On the date of the commencement of the work on Exhibit B Petition Items, provided the Developer is not in default under the provisions of this Agreement, the letter of credit shall be returned to Developer. These expenses shall be incorporated into the total cost to install Exhibit B Petition Items and assessed against the platted lots in accordance with paragraph 5. (b) Letter of Credit #2. On or before , 1995, the Developer shall provide the City with an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of City in the amount of Dollars ($ ), which amount represents 40 percent of thb estimated total coat to construct and install Exhibit B Petition items, which shall be specially assessed against the plat as provided in paragraph 6. If any installment of special assessments as to any lot is not paid in full when due, which occurrence shall constitute an event of default, in addition to any other remedies it may have, the City may draw down Letter of Credit #2 to pay the balance due on the delinquent installment. With City approval, provided Developer is not otherwise in default, Letter of Credit 02 may be written down from time to time when the total remaining balance for all assessed lots less the accumulated surplus fiord provided in paragraph 6(f) totals less than the balance of the letter of audit. The City Administrator shall determine, in his sole discretion, the amount of reduction in the letter of credit, if any. CARDVAGR: 4/2196 Page 7 e® P (c) Letter of Credit 43. On or before , 1995, the Developer shall provide the City with an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of City in the amount of $ . This amount represents the estimated cost ($--__) plus 10% for engineering and staking. Letter of Credit &3 shall be utilized to insure payment of the cost to complete the initial site grading and drainage plan described in paragraph 6. In the event Developer fails to pay bills submitted by City in accordance with paragraph 6, which occurrence shall constitute an event of default, in addition to any other remedies it may have, City may draw down on Letter of Credit i3 to pay any unpaid bills. With City approval, provided Developer is not otherwise in default. Letter of Credit A3 may be written down from time to time upon completion and/or payment in full of the specific obligations as detailed in Exhibits B and C. The City Engineer shall determine at his sole discretion if the obligation has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The City Administrator shall determine at his sole discretion if the obligations have been paid in hill and the amount of reduction in the letters of credit, if any. 13. Surety peficiency. In the event that any letter of credit referred to herein is ever utilized and found to be deficient in amount to pay or reimburse the City in total as required herein, the Developer agrees that upon being notified by the City, Developer will pay the deficient amount within thirty (30) days of notification of the deficient amount. Failure to reimburse the City shall constitute an event of default entitling City to avail itself to any and all remedies provided under this Agreement. 14. Resmnsibility for Costs. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or City in conjunction with the approval and/or development of the plat, including, but not limited to, legal, planning, engineering, inspections during development, the preparation of this contract, and in enforcing the provisions of this Agreement, including reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred by City. B. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. CARDVAGR: 4/21/98 pago g'® O Except as otherwise provided herein, Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless Erom claims made by itself and/or third pasties for damages sustained or costs incurred to public or private property or injury to persons resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which City may pay or incur in consequence of such daims, including attorneys' fees. This indemnification shall not extend to costs attributable to the City's own negligence or that of its agents or employees. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all damage to property of the City incurred in connection with the Exhibit C Developer Items performed by Developer. lb. gvents of Default. The following shall be "Events of Default" under this Agreement and the term "Event of Default" shall mean, whenever it is used in this Agreement (unless the context otherwise provides), any one or more of the following events: A Failure by the Developer to observe and substantially perform any covenant, condition, obligation, or agreement on its part to be observed or performed hereunder, after written notice to the Developer as provided in this Agreement. B. If the Developer shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, or shall file a petition in bankruptcy, or shall make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or shall consent to the appointment of a receiver of itself or of the while or any substantial part of the Property. C. If the Developer shall file a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws. D. The Developer fails to provide the letters of credit required by paragraph 13, fails to pay any special assessment when due for Exhibit B City Petition Items, fails to pay bills for initial site grading expenses when due, or fails to commence, complete, and pay for Exhibit C Developer- Installed Items as provided by this Agreement E. The Developer shall, after commencement of the Exhibit C Developer Items, abandon or substantially suspend construction work, and such act or actions is not due to unavoidable delays and any such defhult, violation, abandonment, or suspension shall not be cured, ended, or remedied within the time provided in this Agreement. CARDVAGR: 4/21/85 Page 9 0 Any other occurrence defined as an event of default within this Agreement. 16. Notice: Remgdies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default occurs, the City shall give written notice of the Event of Default to Developer by United States mail to the Developer at its last known address. If the Developer fails to sue the Event of Default within thirty (30) days of the date of mailed notice, in addition to any other remedy provided in this Agreement and without waiver of any such right, City may avail itself of any or all of the following remedies: (a) Draw down on the appropriate letter of credit; (b) Halt all plat development work and construction, including, but not limited to, release of lots upon sale, the issuance of building permits or certificates of completion, until such time as the event of default is cured; (c) Apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to eg1oin continuation of the event of default; (d) Perform the work or obligation required of Developer. In the event City acts to perform the work obligation, the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by City, or the City may, at its option, draw on the appropriate letter of credit. 17. Clean Un. Developer shall promptly clear from public streota and property any soil, earth, or debris insulting from construction work performed by the Developer, its age, tts or assigns, and adhere to requirements defined in the City's etasion control policy. The City shall promptly clean debris from city streets and from the plat any soil, earth, or debris resulting from construction work performed by or on behalf of the City. 18. Park Dedication. Park dedication requirements have been satisfied via Section 18 of the development agreement governing phase IV of the Cardinal Hills development. 19. Miscellaneogg. A. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors or assigns, as the case may be. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against any party under this Agreement. CARDVAGR: 4/21/98 Page Ii,o C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. D. So long as the City uses its beat efforts to construct the Exhibit B Petition Items, Developer shall have no cause of action for damages attributable to delays in the constriction and completion of said Petition Items. E. No one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until sanitary sewer and water linea have been installed, hooked up, tested, and approved by the City, and until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface. F. The action or inaction of the City as to the exercise of any of its rigbta or remedies upon an event of default shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement as to future events of default. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties, and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release as to any event of default. G. Future residents of the plat shall not be deemed to be third - party beneficiaries of this Agreement. H. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title of the property. Atter the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Agreement, at the Developer's request the City will execute and deliver to the Developer a release which shall be in recordable form. I. Both parties to this Agreement admowledge that they have been represented by counsel, or are aware of their right to counsel, and have entered into this Agreement freely and voluntarily. CARDVAGR: 4/21/95 page 11 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first above written. CITY OF MONTICELLO VALUE PLUS HOMES, INC., OF MONTICELLO By: By: Brad Fyle, Mayor Thomas Holthaus By: By. Rick Wolfsteller Stephen Holker City Administrator By: Matthew Holker STATE OF MINNESOTA) CITY OF MONTICELLO) SS COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) On this day of , 1995, before me personally appeared Brad Fyle and Rick Wolfsteller to me known to be the persons described in the foregoing instrument and who did say they are respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the municipal corporation named therein and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its City Council, and said Brad Fyle and Rick Wolfsteller acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) SS On this day of , 1995, before me personally appeared Thomas Holthaus, Stephen Holker, and Matthew Holker, to me known to be the persons described in the foregoing instrument and who did say they are partners of the corporation name therein, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its partners and said partnere acknowledged said instrument to be the tree act and deed of said corporation. Notary Public CARDVAGR: 4/21/95 Page 1 10 EgHIBIT B Cardinal Hills Phase V Total Project Cost $ Minus Non -Petition Items Site grading $ School Boulevard Pathway $ City -Installed Petition Items Cardinal Hills Phase N Sanitary sewer Water main Storm sewer Road/out and gutter Phase III and phase IV pathways Total est. construction cost of petition items $ LEAF at 28% $ Total estimated Dost of petition items $ Letter of Credit requirement at 4096 $ Number of lots Estimated assessmentAot $ Assessment plus 60% $ CARDVAGR: 4/2LS5 Page 10M EDIT C DEVELOPER ITEMS Cardinal HUls Phase V Boulevard Seed/Sod Tree Planting CARDVAGR: 4/2LW Pegs lOct N Council Agenda • 4/M5 t t. ConQidermoon of a reVinjion accentlne bide and awarding nrobct Cardinal Hills. abase V, (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROU 1�D: At 10 a.m. on Friday, April 21, bids were opened for the construction contract on phase V of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. Twelve bids were received ranging fiom a low bid submitted by Kadlek Construction to a high bid submitted by Randy Kramer Excavating. Attached for your information is the preliminary bid tabulation. The bid amount submitted by Kadlek Construction wars under the engineer's estimate by an amount of $78,928. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONg: 1. Motion to adopt a resolution accepting bide and awarding the project to Kadlek in the amount of $300,699.88. Between Friday and Monday, City staff will be reviewing the credentials of Kadlek to determine whether or not Kadlek is a responsible bidder. Kadlek has been on projects in the past in Monticello and has been in business for some time. It is, therefore, quite likely that Kadlek Construction will have sufficient credentials to be deemed a responsible bidder. 2. Motion to deny accepting bids and awarding the contract. Assuming that references check out and Kadlek Construction can be deemed a responsible bidder, it is recommended that the City Council select alternative 01. 1). SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of bid tabulation, Copy of resolution for adoption. 12 OLD TABULATION FOR STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STN ADDITION CITY PROJECT NO.93.OSC CITY OF MONTICELLO. WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUDS OPENED: IQ= ALL OFW4- ELEF4MAYERON AMD 21, 1995 S ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACTOR GID SECURITY ADDENDUM NOTED TOTAL SID Brw n 6 Cris. Ino. GurealnDAConmunbn.Iicaa8r—'^ C.W. Now. tno. ✓ ✓ 3..17, 09.E (3) Oemlb RM OmN 6 Em QAnIrKh Bros.. Me. Emntrom EaoneWa. hw. Lardwow Comwetlon CO. LATOur Conatrue9on OD. 3 TA a 3.i 6ti NoOWd Caauuctbn Co. Nwfta% CoruVuetbn ✓ ✓ 3 f 7 f 9 3� R L Laron ✓ ✓ 3 S'T'_.>t IL ft ItP.IAWt;n ✓ ✓ 344 /)9 d3 Randy Kamm E+caretlnR ✓ v Redelaw Conttruallon Co. ✓ ✓ RVanCattroctlnT.rw. ✓ ✓ 3/4,23( YrC S. R MYIOerne. Ino. %Wk saw 6 MbMr. Yw. ✓ ✓ 3 %I 618':2v /(moo/,K ✓ ✓ 3ooC'if�. U KSIk/s ✓ v off asUf ENGINEER'S ESTTMATE $372,191.00 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS 19 A TRUE AND CORRECT TABULATION OP THE DOS AS RECEIVED ON APIUL 21, 1995. BY: Uret A Mkka, P.B. OSM pa)eal No. 4m.w 'Omwue Corrected Flpure A1MnrA• Y RESOLUTION 95. RESOLUTION ORDERING PROJECT, ACCEPTING BID, AND AWARDING CONTRACT ON CARDINAL KH,11 PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the property owner petitioned the City for improvements and waived the public hearing requirement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvements to Cardinal Hills phase V, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the attached bide were received complying with the advertisement; and WHEREAS, it appears that Kadlek is the lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of $300,599.88. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution approving plans and specifications as adopted on the 27th of March, 1995. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Kadlek in the name of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, for the improvements to phase V of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Administrator. 3. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of Cho successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained w►til a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of April, 1995. Mayor City Administrator QSX Orr April 24, 1995 300 Park Puce East 5775 Wayuta ea,kvara MND. MN 55116-1228 612-595.5775 1-804753.5775 PAX 595.5774 Mayor and City Council City of Monticello P.O. Box 1147 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362-9245 Re: Street, Utilities and Appurtenant Work Cardinal Hills 5th Addition City Project No. 95.06C City of Monticello Wright County, Minnesota OSM Project No. 4892.60 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: EnRinetr5 A tests Plamien surveyors Bids were received for the above -referenced project at 10:00 a.m., April 21, 1995, and were opened and read aloud. A total of twelve responsive bids were received. Kadlec Construction of Mora, Inc., Route 5, Box 81, Mora. MN 55051, submitted the lowest bid in the amount of 5300,797.86. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy and tabulated. The Engineer's Estimate was $322,783.00. We recommend award of the contract to Kadlec Excavating of Mora, Inc., in the amount of $300,797.86. The Bid Tabulation and Bid Extension are enclosed. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, - INC. Sl 1n 6�/+ Bret A. Weiss, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures c: Rick Wolfsteller, City of Monticello Valve Plus Homes ce ,M0WC?M%C0RR sw.a.WC EV -d cirpon-dy uocw BID TABULATION FOR STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION CITY PROJECT NO. 9546C CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA BIDS OPENED: 1090 A.M. ORR•SCHELHN•MAYERON ArA 21, 1995 9. ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACTOR BID ADDENDUM TOTAL BID SECUR17Y NOTED Kadlec, Excayallne of Mnn CW 7978(, Rtan Construction Inc 5116.21650 C,VW Ho- tj22AUILYf Volk Sewer R Water S111,618,25 Re&qtnnr Conguructinn 5114191 52 Kurchle Underground SMd 10650 Noflhd.le Ccmat, ikn tU793171 R.P. Utilities Inc tM9.62993 Into ar atmnlnn Ing ttG7 M969 R.L. Lorson Eurnting, 216.90 Burichville CominiclinnInr S159-22850 Randy Kramer Fscavatiraa.Inc. 5169197 U_ -FNMF-f.R Y,TM 1A78 13221WL 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT TABULATION OF THE BIDS AS RM� D-:_ 21, 1995. BY: Bret A. Weiss, P.E. OSM Project No. 4312.60 "Denotes Corrected Fwuro a%Yat Ina soft rru _i Extension of Bids STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY PROJECT NO. 95 -MC WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 4892.80 Bid Date: AprA 21, 1995 10:00 A.M. Denotes corrected figure. e10504. 1.6'CURO STOP 600% I e -ENGINEER'S LOW BIDDER 2000 "2ND BIDDER 3RD BIDDER 105.00_ 6105m ESTIMATE $140.00 KAOLEC E%CAV. OF MOM nYAN CONTA„ INC C.W. HOULE. WC. 9000.00 100.00 TOW BIO: $322,783.00 TOW Bid: $700,707.66 Tow Old 5316X30.50 TOW Oft 8327062.1 Item Spw No De4erotbn aum107 UNI 186 Pdm Ilan Tat• uN1 Pem Orn Taw 1618 Ptlu 611n Tam UW Pem DOm Tow I ISCHEDULE A: SANITARY SEWER 05.00 11,100.00 00m {1,020.00 7m $018.00 ' 17�20:I.5q I.6•COnPORATt0N STOP 1 LACH 76.00 t 12105.5/3 ORANUTAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL 700 TON 0.00 1111,200.00 0.01 $2.00 0.01 $2.00 001 0.00 212m1.5018•X4•PVCWYE 35 EACH 45.00 61.575 00_ ,0500 $10_ 51=.00 50.00 $1.75000 41.00 $t,470.00 312021.50dE%TRA4$owY.N.DEPTHoVEn1a 12ALmFT 75,00 tWC.oO 71,0_o $CIA00 7000_$600.00 t 5!," _-91 •CURS STOP 8 DO% 65.00 $606,001 4;202-1;01iST-ANDARO 4' SANITARY SEWER MH(?IO) I EACH 12.0000 {13,200,00 1,100_00 1112,100.00 1.100.00 1110,10000 1,51500 S14I.M.001 n_R7t stile PVC PIPE SEWER 8DR 20 SERVICE PIP _ISM LIN FT 7.00 $1D_600.00 6,00 $7,500100 0.60 $0,750.00 525 $7075.00 6 2021.511;0• PVC PIPE BEWER 8DR 75 1007 LIN FT_ 15,00 06.00500 10.50 {20,073.50 $000.00 11�,005.OD 11.05 1122,706.05 7?6IV.1I CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOUE/STUB 0 EACH 11100.00 61,500.00 100.00 $166.00 _1500 500.00 111000.00 43000 $1,317.00 Iw 1 wt. at,anuul.a wt BANITARYBEWER {500_00 117010.00 "2AM$0 84_50.00 $6407500 ,57 LM FT S0.0$3.43 I I I IDCHEDULE 01 WATERMAN _10.00 I/AO B�I�W2,00 19m {12MIm 11.06 {II 108 r_01 vcII.w4rwATrRmAwoucTlRONCL.a2 1410 LM FT I e10504. 1.6'CURO STOP 600% I e 15000 f�m.00 2000 $12500 105.00_ 6105m 11000 $140.00 012011 CONNCCT TO E108TN0 WATER MAIN 3 EACH 300,00 9000.00 100.00 8300.00 500.00 $1,500m 326.00 $070.00 10 2011,502HYDRANT 3 EACH 1 XOOM _{7.000.00 1050`00 0,160.00 /.050m p,150m 1005.00 Qt0550 11!2811.59V CORPORATION STOP 70 EACH 05.00 {1.100_00 05.00 11,100.00 00m {1,020.00 7m $018.00 ' 17�20:I.5q I.6•COnPORATt0N STOP 1 LACH 76.00 675.00 118.00 6176.00 100.00 {100.00 113.00 (119.00 0.OATS VALVE AND 00% 5EACH - 960.00_{1.750.00 W5.00 {1,02700 30'00 ,0500 $10_ 50m {2,68! _00 ^_1412011.r03 e• BATE VALVE AND 00% 5 EACW C -10-T _12,75000 a5.00 0,02600 43.00 0,150.00 M.00. S% M.00 � t 5!," _-91 •CURS STOP 8 DO% 34 EACH _80_00 0.720.00 --70.00 _ 0'180.00 00.00 0_OIOm 64.00 0.17008 t01i20t 1,60 VALVE 00%C%TENSION 1.5 LIN rr 00m600.00 56.00 SUAD $4500 110.00 7800 ~ _ t7 7011.807 HVOrUM C7rTCNS10N !.5 LD1 FT 0.75.00 250.00 -_ __- (676.00 _'30.00 150.00 11675.00. 040.00- $000.00 _ v 181601I.Mi • TYPE K COPPER PIPE _ '__ _i__._-____ 1440 LM FT _. __ _M.00 7.00 ___ 810080'00 6.00 --__ $8.040m 8.50 {0,900_00 5183 28,770.00 �0 2011.80 t.6• TYPE K C_OPKA PD$ 60 UK FT _10.00 {500.00, {500_00 8.50".00 0.00 84_50.00 202011, 0' WATER MAINC=IRON C, 62 ,57 LM FT 1300 �1lMlm _10.00 I/AO B�I�W2,00 19m {12MIm 11.06 {II 108 r_01 vcII.w4rwATrRmAwoucTlRONCL.a2 1410 LM FT 1800 0/,150m -!_14.50 _-.M 830,706.00 15m 01,15000 N,65 1X5!80 22 2011 4' POLYCTVRCNS INSULATION 150 5'O OODD 000 00 0 - - 81,837.60 16.00 0.40000 1400 tm 00. rP9 fill.. a oLleTa.E 470N ITTTINOS _YO 1400 L0. _ - 1.60 alm.00 _1248 ._- 140 ^ ---{I,6tl.00 /m 61.400m tic mance Poi o112 Extension of Bids Bid Dale: April 21, 1995 10'00 A.M. STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION " Denotes lxrtected figure. CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY PROJECT NO. 95-06C WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 4892.60 ENGINEER'S LOW BIDDER 2ND BIDDER 3RD BIDDER ESTIMATE KADLEC ExCAV. OF MORA WAN COMM. INC C.W. HOULE. INC. TOW 010: S32.mw Totd IN: 070DWAG Tow aid, 83111=0. 60 TOW W. {727.419.22 Item SW No Wteriptim Ouwav Ll11 ILVA Prim Deet Tow UNI A Ake it. Torr Unit Rb own Tett LWA Price Dorn T I ITOTAL SCHEDULE O: WATERYADI I 117.421.00 {11XMAD {11,101.40 111!.141.11 I I I I ISCNEWLE CI STORM SEWER I I I I 24I9101XA24' RC PIPS APRON WRRASH GUARD 1 EACH 1.000.00 {1.000.00 1.020.00 SIA20.00 1.000.00 11.000.00 705.40 115.001 25i7603.541I IY nC PIPS SCVIEn DESION ]000 CL V I 127 LD1 FT LOAD 12.480.00 10.10 IIA27.00 10.60 /2.478.00 IL50 SIMM 20'1500.51 �16' nC IR'E CtVXR DESIGN 0000 Cl. V 00 LimFT _ IM.00 17.00 (520.00 RD" 601400 17AD moo 271}50-3 4 I Iar RC FIPS sEWSn DEBION 3�Do CL V 120 101 FT _10.00 21- 12.620.00 1110- Rtoo110 7710 12.010.00 10.76 02,!'o oo I 20 M314%21'RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN MO CIL 11 74 LIN FT 2'3.00 {1.702.OD _2116 11MOO 9SAO 11,060.00 Sim /1.464,00 20116 000 03.41124' RC PIPE smn OEam 3CL 0 1 364 LIN FT 110.181.00 22.4_0 _ _1124731.01) 11!00 0..00 1020 33.60 60100AD 30) 1500,_CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN TEACH _20.00 OOOAO _{6,300.00 OSO.OD p,U5000 730.00 88.110.00 700.00 MA00_� - CONSTRUCT wm4oLis0E91GN 164020 4,FJ1CH I,000.00H.00D.00 1.000.0_0 N.00400 1.100_00 14.400.0 3,100.40 64AW.0 _3111500.500 J2�L'O8.110B CONBTRUCT MANHOLE DESIDN 644020 1 EACH 1.400.00{1.t00.OD 1.760.00 114niloo /.600.OD $1.500.40 1.700.40 11.}00.00 37;}511AoI;CL2 nip RAPWSIRSMICLD. CROWD) 13 Ou YD .5.00 45.00 rX .00 45.00 93A26_AD 64m a.60D.00 31115113-0tTiRAN00Y RIPRAP CLASS10 WITH FABRIC to CU YO_ _ 50.00 _ _,et0,00_ _SSW Do _ 45.00 _---1700.00 1450.00 28.00 1300 .00 6L 00 .-�1.00 520 35 064, LL IPVC SUD-0DRAM 100 LM FT 1000 {1.400.00 7.0 0.00 1000.00 0.00 voaw i u r wt, eunGYYbe m I {TORY saWER I I 04.U7.00 waft" 114AOGAO """A I I I I 10CHEDUL6 O: STREST CONSTRUCTION I .An x310352ASELECT RIIL RORIIOW" - ~--- 3700 z1 YD '- -- 400 614.8110.00 8.70 70 _04.900 5.00 SOD. $161M. 31121,.60 AQORCaATB OAC _E CLASS 5 4 �3W N TO -_- 5,00 1121.76000 _ _ 600 _ 01.760.00_ 8.10 _12D_10SAo 4.07 VIAt0.50 2l!731.81 TYPE 310ACS SOURCE LRXTURO 005 TTON low X0.40 /T7�760.00 1840 11.432 ao i--- - 301331.006TYPE 41 WEARMO COURCC unff S TON' ,20M 02.00 _110.700.00 - {ro,M0.00 _ 2011 _1u171.ao_ - $1,140.011 _ �_ 00.50 11.700.0 low $14 jo � -- _720 _- _ _ 40 YJS7. OITUYOIOUD WTERUL FOR TACK COAT 405 OAllON _ _ _ 1.00 _{405.00 _ /.0 _ 14.5 -`_ _1105,00 _ 1.00_ 0483_00 IAO 1488.40 41 1031.601{-Ct>rICfISTC CURD � QUTTCR OECKIN d _ 1Y6 AND RCINDTALL 4300 :AN PT _ -- . � 000 _ t21,60D,O0 - _.!0000 640.488.00 4A0 {10.00D_00 4.60 ItO./00.0 432554.; -95RR BARRICADCO tl PAIRS` 7011.00 x_0000.00 _ - 830000 -_ 150.00 078000 00.00 1160.00 43t0Z SO CRU!:1 ROCIL • 1 VY CLCAR If OU YD 10.00 {190.00 13.00 0141.00 16.00 {110.00 0.01 10.1! V 1K WrrItYYYI YI I1 STREaTCD111TRUCTION I loss" 1100AN.00 ms"AO Min." Pal o112 Pe; of 12 Extension of Bids Bid Date: April 21, 1995 10:00 A.M. STREETS, UTILMES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADOMON Denotes corrected CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY PROJECT NO. 95-OBC WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 4892.60 ENGINEER'S LOW BIDDER 2ND BIDDER 3RD BIDDER ESTIMATE KADLEC EXCAV. OF MOM RYAN CONTR.. INC C.W. HOULE. INC. Tdw ft 027,7600 TOW W SM.?D7At TOW w 6310,27060 TOW Bit. 02746222 h- SW No Dow0ptlan I r CAo,D7 unit IA ,O Rb IW0 Tow UW Rb hem TOa um ren own Tote "Rin Wm T IOCHEOULS Et WM GRAMO I �. o,os.6o SM CRADWO WW 1 LSUM GOAa M $W.ODDAe 4/.76040 940,760.00 05.00D.00 933.00[00 "AMM 93070.001 46 2576.60'�B000WO 06100 SO YD 1.00 94,610.0125 [3.]65.00 IAO 0,22040 1.40 64"&00 46 SEEDING 23 ACRE SM.00 61!.60000 MOO _ _ 1111AnOD 45040. $t1,Q50L0 4" VIAY6.00 47 2577. SILT FENCE. HEAVY DUTY 2000 LIN FT 0.50 95MOD SAO 94AOOA0 1.60 O.000AO IAS two.0 46 2676. WOOD FMER OLAIIKET TWE REGULAR 200 SG TO IN 9300.0 1.10 8420.0 1.50 0040 LIO 6L40A0 467577.W� OAL8 CHECK 50 EACH 5.00 5200.00 too SM.0 640 5260AD 0.00 sm.00 TOTAL 9C11EDUL2 E, 61T8 ORAOM 6710040 SN.110A0 93102440 so as 18AIR 10.0 60.0 woo Woo Ogh 8CNEDULE9 A THRU 8 6777,7040 00.506.0 9316.27600 07700.77 Pe; of 12 Extension o1 Bids Bid Date: April 21, 1995 10:00 A.M. STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION "Denotes corrected figure. CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY PROJECT NO. 95-06C WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 4892.60 4TH BIDDER 5TH BIDDER 6TH BIDDER 7TH BIDDER VOLK SEWER 6 WATER REDSTONE CONSTR. KUECHLE UNDERGROUND NORTHDALE CONSTR. Tat W& 1331,61825 Toted W. 9234,191.52 rated W {744,100.50 toW 01(k. $34743325 It- Slava No D..Kplbn ou"t7 Lwt LVA PAO4 tern Tam wat Rico Rem TOO, Lkw P&o Item Taw LIM PIW Ilam T ISCHEDULE AI SANITARY SEWER 1(2103.343 GRANULAR FOUNDATION UATERIAL 200ITON Goo 11,000.00 0.01 $2.00 0.01 92.00 0.01 12.00 212821.6016'X4' PVC WYE 35 EACH 71.00 11,225_00 52.60 {1.84300 02.00 !2.170.00 50.50 {1.7x7.30 3!2821.500 EXTRA 46' DIA M.H. DEPTH OVER 10 12.4 LN rr 63 378x26 $632.00 60,00 9012.00 41=1110d OTAHDMD 4- aANITARY SEWER MH l61o'1 It EACH _00.00 1.700 00 _INO2.00_ 113,200_00 _63 1,427.03 {15,607.33 _55.00 I,700.00 {13.700.00 1.310_00 $14,410.00 5�262t.5I 114' PVC MPG SEWER SW 20 SERVICE PIPE 1000 LW FT 0.00 {0,00000 5.12 $1I.INIC OD _ _4.70 _ $7,050.00 Oi 26212111'' PVC PIPE SCWER Son 35 1007 LM FT 11.00 _120,077.00 1022 _67,G90.0D 310,430.34_ _7.76 1x.00 {23.603.00 1520 923_06x_10 7DIV.I1•'CONNECTTOEXISTWOMANHOLCISTUa 3EACH 100.00 $300.00 1,125.92 $3,377.40 47040 $1.410.00 650.00 31,0!0.00 U I AL t,LNL W Ltd A: (I SANITARY SEWER I 127,!6440 846,363.12 123.200.00 SCHEDULED; WATERLMN j � I 61=4,00 1,5' CURB STOPS OOX 1EACH ISO, 00 IM14 {103.14 112.00 $1/2.00 130.00 3160.00 /12011 CONNECTTOEXISTINOWATCRIMIN 3EACH _ _200 01 _9150,00 3000.00 1,125.67__12,377.40 55000 Sl,W_0.00 483.00 31,455.00 t0+P011 • HYDRANT 3 EACH 1,200.00 _12,000.00_ t,4N 01 _HAA33_63 1,6 0000 84.600.00 1,170.00 $3 40,x10 1112011. 1-c CORPOMT�OAI ATOP EACH {306.00 34.00 {1,160.00 10.16 9651.10 _ 12T2011. 1.5' CORPORATION STOP _31 1 EACH _4000 _{I,3CO.OD {76.00 _2684 _ 800,70 70^00 670.00 36.26 36!.26 • L 13 ^011! x' C ATE VALVE AND BOX x EACH- _76.00 400 OD 12.000.00 _._66.30 30D CO {1.05343 570.00 82.850.06 2!0.00 61,00040 141MI IM2 Y OATII VALVE AND BOX 5IEACH700.00 12,600.00 60041 _32.646.35 840.00 64.20040 600.00 82.600.00 2011 rCUga"A BOX 341{{IEACH_ 1040 92=00 WAS 92.0".40 WAD 82_244.00 Moo 92.40.00 _ _182011. VALDOXCXILNStON 1.1IW1rt 2b.ao� {3/.60 _26.27 $37701 2140 971;60 63.00 {lt60 • 1/ 0011.603H1'DRANT EXTCNSION a In, 2011_631' TYPE K COPPER PIPE 9.6 LN FT 141016_1 FT_ 35000 6.00 307140 12.610.00 202.64 6.07 03011160 33.70_6.30 33040 600 8626.00 819y00040 976.00 0.63 61117.60 Son -.00 1x12011.fA 191'.5-TY'Pa K COPPCR PIPE 60 .1.01 FT 10.00 14.00 "WAS 10.25 {511,.60 6' WATER UUZU1 T IRDN CL 12 LIN FT_. _ _$500.00 {13^106.00 _743 Cot _9351.50 {12,841.841 13.50 {1!,11x.60 _rO0011,5W 01 1.603 x' WATCR MAIN -0L7 IRON CL 12 P I4t0 LN PT _ _I 930,022.00 _13.00 _ 16 $21.150m m _16.00121,160.00 _14.20 _ ,00 _10.15 371,771.60 06,1. 4• POLVOTYRE7lQ NCUlATION 1x0 EA 1/12 12.00 _111276.00 17." 92,"6.00 _11 00 17.100.00 Ia.oO 12.203.00 j. 27�Q01,,62 DUCIAQIRpi F11TU1C16 1400 I.B. 1.00 31,400:00 Im- $1..26,00 LOAD 62.100.00 1.50 92.Moo Pr 4 of 12 STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY PROJECT NO. 9S -06C WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 4892.60 Item Sp. No 0-,4w- 1 -,4 -I ITOTAL SCHEDULE D: WATERMAIN I I I ISCHEOULE C: STORM SEWER 24 2:01.51524• RC PIPE APRON WftRASH GUARD t2• nC PIPE SEWER DESIGN MN CL V 2012503.5411 S' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 7000 CL V 77,2507.511,11 e'TIC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 5003 CL V _26,2507 541'21' RC PIPE SOWER DESIGN 7000 CL IO 20250__ ]_W 1124• RC PIPE SEWCR DESIGN 7000 CL IR 3;2500.500rCONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN _71�7303,Atl CONSTRUCT MANHOLES_-OC_MON 10_d020 -_ _ 72 2500.50E CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 334_020 GRADING)- 2 RIP MP WEIRS ((HOLD. NG) _ 34,2511.301 RANDOM 219409 CLASS 10 *TRI FAD_rUC ' 35 DIV. IF PVC SUR•DRAIN 11 u 1 w� ut.nauul.0 u 070240 SHWER I (SCHEDULE DI STREET CONSTRUCTION 2105.52"SCLCCT CI7ANULM 0022002 (CVS .__ 77�22t 1,5�11GOREOATE DASE CLASS 6 ` 3012331.W0TYPE 41 WEARtN 411¢531.601 CONCRf:TF CUI1R t QUTTCtrn DtDIQ_N O 42 9554 505 RCMOVE AND -RE . INSTALL DAnnicADro 3 0451.1:040 1uOHCD ROCU • 1 irr CLEAR IIU 1w1. 1H "l -uI STREST C0N9"LICTION Extension of Bids Bid Date: April 21, 1995 10:00 A.M. Denotes corrected figure. $100" 1107.066.6/ $611SA 9 116.6461$ Pe { of 12 4TH BIDDER 5TH BIDDER -6TH BIDDER "7TH BIDDER VOLK SEWER b WATEn REDSTONE CONSTR. HUECHLE UNDERGROUND NORTHOALE CONSTR. loteleid: $171.618.25 Taml Bid: $334.101.52 TOW Bb: 6344.106.50 TOW W. $.717,97725 Oro ro LMI Lkm Pe- IWn ToW UNI Prim nom Tom I U04 Prim nem T0.1LW Prke pre T I ilo.bto.io I SWmIle "IlAm65 I SOMAS I 1�EACH 000.00 1000_00 051.07 _9051,07 1,100.00 $1.t00.o0 _900.00 {90000 121,LINFT 17.00_ 12,150.00 _15.72 _ $1,900.44 _ 20,00 12_510_00 10.25 12".T6 SO LIN rT _19.50 $555.00 10.07 6-07.00 _21.00 $070.00 2050 _101500 120 LIN FT _M00 __$2,400,00 _1&?S 2250 SO -__$1,570.04 _27.00 $_2.700.00_ 22.15 12.691.00 74 LIN FT 27.00 ,70 _{12.00 _20.41 25.00 $1.050.00 _2525 11,506,50 304 LIN Fr _ 25.00_ $9,100.00 ..52 27.00 0.928.00 26.00 $10.191.00 _7 EACH _75000 _ _ fS,P50�00 ^22.05 090.02 -$52•+5 _ 050.00 _0.100.00 700_00 $$.6_3000 CACN__ _ - 00000 _0.000.00 - 1104,53 95,219.32 t,SWAS 0.00000 960.00�p_02-9. I,r.ACH 1,100.00 _- _4000 _ _$I,I00d10 _ _1.440.13 $1,443.17 1.700.00 ^__-34.00 $1.7_00,00_ 1.370.00 $1.37000 55 CU VD -_ -- __f7.4m.0D 42.02 "- -00,00 --"04,00- $7,715.00 40.00 17100,00 10 CUro `4o,w _ _0.00 '{40 - $SOO - - -02.00 -- 43.00 - $430.00 _00 640 4 0 000 100 LIN FT 900 900 $.00 002 0OD 6.50 050.00 6.50 "wa 131,${6.00 I 134.107.34 11{,60.00 171.174]$ I _7700 CU YD � _ 0.65 620,535.00 _ 6,50 $20.35,00 _ _350 ^.0$21,402.00 612,030.00 6.70 pt,OD000 4750 TCN 5.74 00 _624.9.00 _•4.07, - $21.40200 _ 4.92 5.40 _{77.40000 905 TON _20.64 MAIMS _1041_ $17,763,05 - 10.00 {77,770.00 90.00 11610000 --415 24,14 _ {17,511.20 -20.61 (11,70720, _ _ 21,00-11116.12001) . 11.50 $16,44000 GALLON_ I.OS f50025 ._1.00 T $465.00 _1.00 �__ {469.00 1.05 650025 4700 LD1R 4.14 _ 620.762,00 _ _6,40 127.52000 4.95 _!.,$16.709m 4.55_ _616.5[300 ^_ 7 PAIR_ -_rO,00 _ _6150.00 20000 000,00 10000 __000.00 ___00.00_ 12 CII YO^ 1500 6180.0D 1500 {180.00 17.00 1.'04.00 _1170,00 12.00 {14400 $100" 1107.066.6/ $611SA 9 116.6461$ Pe { of 12 STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY PROJECT NO.95-09C WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 4692.60 04m 9$340 Mo De4ab0on I i ,SCHEDULE E: SITE GRAOMG 44 0144. IH SITEGRADG 45 7370 BODGING 40 02=.adSuma 47 2377. SILT FENCE. HEAVY DVrV 402570.;WOOD 1710ER BLANKET TVPE REGULAR 401211".50aDALE CHECK TOTAL SCHEDULE Et $RB GRAD= DASA 0105 8CHEDUL01 A THRU E E7dension of Bids Bid Date: April 21, 1995 10:00 A.M. Denotes corrected figure. Pr SDI 12 0 4TH BIDDER 5TH BIDDER 6TH BIDDER 17TH BIDDER VOLK SEWER 6 WATER REDSTONE CONSTR. KUECHLE UNDERGROUND CONSTR. Totmdit $371,01023 Totdit $334,101.02 Toltl W. 03".10450 OI4101d: 0347.01123 0unn115 UNI I Wil Pin Own Td. UNI PAn dwn Trio- 1704 Pd- 114w1 T Wil PIk4 own T � 1 LUMP SW 04447.70 SM" .70 00.007AC C9.000AC 5007000700 70$300700 1707000.001 !000 EO YD 1.77 03.977.00 x _i00.U7.00 015.0 1.00 54=00 IA $3.00 01 h ACRE 441.00 $1_1,210.00 _1m - 440.00 _03,0 1117000.00 4.00.00 510.000.00 070700 01470000 2000LM R 1.07 03.000.00 1.00 1.00 - 03.00 220 64AM- 0 7.2'5 10.500.00 200 SG YD 104 $4001-00 2700 _NODAO 125 1100.00 O.$0 0100.00 50 EACH 0.10 $203700 0.00 0300.00 0.00 030000 110 5105700 410.103.70 000.002.00 $00.700.00 144.00000 i 00700 $0.00 00.00 00.00 071.91021 0374105.$3 9MMOL90 047.01211 Pr SDI 12 0 I I I I I I ISCKEDULE O: WATERMAIN I I elo]O2,"""C"""C��J��Jii x CURD DToP A Dox 1 rACH _ 105.00 1105.00 124.0_0 $124.00 $0900$100.00 0 251I NECT TO EXISTING WATEn MAIN ] CACH ._030.00 11030.00 4]0.00 _{1,200.00_ /10A0 $0.70.00 10 2271. NYBRAM 0 CAO/ t,400.OD 14,200.00 1000.00 _44_070.00 ,,000.00 44.110.00 tt 2611.65 1• COnPORATION STOP 34 EACH _]0,00 11,020.0 5.1.10111.737.40 37.00 11,088.00 10 40, 7,65 t 1LTCRrMulOMRON OT0P 1 EACH __ 47.00 147,00 _ 000 {60_00 WAS 120100 1]4811,60'5 O'OATE VALVE AND SOX_ 6EACH ]3000 $1760.00 _300.00 $1,000_00 42000 $],100.00 147e11.604 e`tUTE VALVE AND Dox 6 EAON 46000 82.4.30_ro _1U7,00 _d.U5.00. 613.00 82.715.00 5 so,,.ee 1`CurtD DTOP OOX _ _31 cACN_ --250 00 --yj��w --�P'00 2� J� 1 15.40 _ /]060.00 _ _ 7oA0 VAN.00 00.00 _0.02000 10 901,. VALVfi DOX EXTENSION _-_ 1,6 LD1 FT __60.00 -,176.00 _40.90 100_]0 87.00 q].00 17 201700 HYDRANT EXTENSION . - /.5 UN FT _ 75.00 _ $187.50 017.00 /614.50 9]/.Oo _/525.00 12 2011 _ t' T/PL K COPPCR PIPE 1440 UNIT -,-7.0] . 110,14].40 _ 505 18,60.0_0 876, /0.740.00 10 9811 '-WTYPE K COPPER PI 0 LIN R 0.N! 1491.00 -0.00 _ _1/00.00 IIS6 $Stl,60 _ 20 9017. 0• WATCR_MAM-0UCT IRON CL 67 y --y , 037�Ldi FT _ 16.]1 _ {14.020,]6 _1].40 _$1$.6]4.40 1/.20._$14.40.60 -/ 1 201 t, _ 6' WATER MAdOl1CT IRON Q 62 1410 UN FT_ 1600 - _$76,320 O1) 12.00 177,580_00 11.06 01,420.60 _974011 4'POLYOTYMM INSULATION ---'160 CO YD 7_00 0.08.50 20.80 0,000.00 14,50 17200 43.4611. CIUCTILOIRON FITTINOD 14W L0. 0.19 11.240.0D t.30 11,00.01) 1.40 /1,00011 PD 7 o1 12 Extension o1 Bids Bid Date: April 21, 1995 10:00 A.M. STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION "Denotes corrected figure. CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY PROJECT NO. 95-06C WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 4892.60 8TH BIDDER 9TH BIDDER 1OTH BIDDER R. P. UTILITIES, INC. LATOUR CONSTR., INC. R. L LARSON EXCA., OOC. Taal Old; 1]19.72.6] TaW Old: 2062,02.09 raw Be. 053,41800 nam Span No 0-00- Oom" unu UM Pd.. fan Tot- Un6 Pdm toot Toa ,8,11 Prin Item T I 1 �scHrouLa At SANITARY SEWER I 1 :165.14 GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL 200 TON 3.00 61100.00 0.20 140.00 Obi OA0 1.60211x4' PVC WYE 1 21202 2' 03 EACH 33.00 $1,245._00 7].13 2,33 100.2 7500 $1,225.0D ] 2041.300 EXTRA aT DU. Y.H_DEPTH OVER t012.4 LIN FT 00,00 {90.44 65.00 260000 -`4421.605"�BTANOMD 4' SIINREWER ARV CMH (0 1V1 EACH _ 00 1,2.00 _{024.00 _00.00 1, 440.00 1,140.00 $12,620.001 I b1202151 q4' PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 20 SEAVICE PIPE _11 1600 LIN K 0.31 _$1])00_00 _217,022.00 200 $0,00000 0 i 6• PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 19117 LIN FT 21.13 _f5A03.00 $20,202,91 _0.00 _-10,0L0.00 13.00 149,073.20 12.00 Va.000.00 DN4021.61 7 .14 ICOHCT TO EIOSTIND WWHOLTJSTUS NE ] EACH ]30.00 $1,030.00 013.00 11,213.00 410.00 {0]0.00 Iw,A' t0.L'YIt w1 BANRARYn6HYWER 18$,82$.$1 I i27A01.80 $5001.001 I I I I I I ISCKEDULE O: WATERMAIN I I elo]O2,"""C"""C��J��Jii x CURD DToP A Dox 1 rACH _ 105.00 1105.00 124.0_0 $124.00 $0900$100.00 0 251I NECT TO EXISTING WATEn MAIN ] CACH ._030.00 11030.00 4]0.00 _{1,200.00_ /10A0 $0.70.00 10 2271. NYBRAM 0 CAO/ t,400.OD 14,200.00 1000.00 _44_070.00 ,,000.00 44.110.00 tt 2611.65 1• COnPORATION STOP 34 EACH _]0,00 11,020.0 5.1.10111.737.40 37.00 11,088.00 10 40, 7,65 t 1LTCRrMulOMRON OT0P 1 EACH __ 47.00 147,00 _ 000 {60_00 WAS 120100 1]4811,60'5 O'OATE VALVE AND SOX_ 6EACH ]3000 $1760.00 _300.00 $1,000_00 42000 $],100.00 147e11.604 e`tUTE VALVE AND Dox 6 EAON 46000 82.4.30_ro _1U7,00 _d.U5.00. 613.00 82.715.00 5 so,,.ee 1`CurtD DTOP OOX _ _31 cACN_ --250 00 --yj��w --�P'00 2� J� 1 15.40 _ /]060.00 _ _ 7oA0 VAN.00 00.00 _0.02000 10 901,. VALVfi DOX EXTENSION _-_ 1,6 LD1 FT __60.00 -,176.00 _40.90 100_]0 87.00 q].00 17 201700 HYDRANT EXTENSION . - /.5 UN FT _ 75.00 _ $187.50 017.00 /614.50 9]/.Oo _/525.00 12 2011 _ t' T/PL K COPPCR PIPE 1440 UNIT -,-7.0] . 110,14].40 _ 505 18,60.0_0 876, /0.740.00 10 9811 '-WTYPE K COPPER PI 0 LIN R 0.N! 1491.00 -0.00 _ _1/00.00 IIS6 $Stl,60 _ 20 9017. 0• WATCR_MAM-0UCT IRON CL 67 y --y , 037�Ldi FT _ 16.]1 _ {14.020,]6 _1].40 _$1$.6]4.40 1/.20._$14.40.60 -/ 1 201 t, _ 6' WATER MAdOl1CT IRON Q 62 1410 UN FT_ 1600 - _$76,320 O1) 12.00 177,580_00 11.06 01,420.60 _974011 4'POLYOTYMM INSULATION ---'160 CO YD 7_00 0.08.50 20.80 0,000.00 14,50 17200 43.4611. CIUCTILOIRON FITTINOD 14W L0. 0.19 11.240.0D t.30 11,00.01) 1.40 /1,00011 PD 7 o1 12 Extension of Bids STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY PROJECT NO. 95 -WC WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 4892.60 Bid Date: Apr021, 1995 10:00 A.M. - Denotes corrected figure. 25 "5.51 20 2507.31 _30 2500.51 _71 2500.51 72i2300,a _77 rsti.a F---64 2511.$1 73 ON. 11. I I I 70'2103.3: 77 >yl t.a 70 2771.3 77 4771.$1 40 2737,b 41 }1571.0 42 2/64.b is, RC PIPE SEWER DESIGM 7005 CL v - - -`- _ 8TH BIDDER 9TH BIDDER 10TH BIDDER 20.10 1607_00 Is." IL P. UTILITIES, INC. LATOUR CONSTn., INC. n. L LARSON EXCA., INC. 120 Lw Fr _ --t91$1.657.:9 TOW W. 049 09.07 roMl w t352=.60TOW OW. 92S3,21LOD Own SP44 No Do4allolon Gummy LIM UM1 Pd. Own Torr UnU Prb nm Tole UMI P,la 114In T I ITOTAL SCHEDULE D: WATERNWN I I ! 9/7.647.]. I mm2m 24' nC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 7000G 111 _ _ __------_ 151.4UM ISCHEOULE C: STORM SEWER I I I I I I ! $10.410.40 2550 242501.51i24• RC PIPE APRON W7rRASH GUARD I I(EACH VA. 00_ 050.00 1.Otl 00 11.080.00 OIOAO X0.00 23 2503.54 IT RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN WN CL V 127 LIN FT ISSS 12X•3.03 1150 12.400.30 13.03 01,02355 25 "5.51 20 2507.31 _30 2500.51 _71 2500.51 72i2300,a _77 rsti.a F---64 2511.$1 73 ON. 11. I I I 70'2103.3: 77 >yl t.a 70 2771.3 77 4771.$1 40 2737,b 41 }1571.0 42 2/64.b is, RC PIPE SEWER DESIGM 7005 CL v - - -`- _ _70 LINFT _ 10.72 _VALGA 20.10 1607_00 Is." 891m 10• nc WPE SEW n DESIGN 7005 a V -_ -_- 120 Lw Fr _ --t91$1.657.:9 }1.00 _17.$125.00 20.25 $2,43MO 21' RC PK'R LEWGn DESIGN 7000$1 UI _ - 74 LIN FT `07.50 111.770.00 _ 240D __ _11.770,00 20.00 24' nC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 7000G 111 _ _ __------_ 704 LIN FT _05]1 --1/ pmm ._-W64S00--{5.7750_0 80 $10.410.40 2550 W,79LP0 CONSTRUCT CATCH RACIN TEACH_!_ 00000- X0.00 710.00__ICOM 00 dGGNsrnueT 14AN1/OIEa DeD1GN/a4075 __ _ _ __ , EACH _ 1,20080 1,IK100_-_64.720_00 075_00 117.0=00 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 541020 1 EACH V I,5W.0D _S4A00.00 _ 91,600.00 1,5'A 00 11,550,00 1,700.00 11,700.00 CL2aIr nAP_WEInSJIRCLO.Cn_AIXN_GJ__ 'IPVC _ _ _SS CUYD - 7700----f7.175A0 - - -noo - _u00V HO=OD -- »�00 12.)500 M "INSC RIPRAP CLASS 10 - W5T11 iAORIC _ _ -10`CU'-- - - -_ 1300.00, . _ _1700170 4550 _ _ -65435,00 - 70m 9200 .00 mm-G`n INS I00,VN FT 7.00 1.00 {500.00 8.76 son 00 uuL oLnwuLo u (1 STORM SEWER I $33,101.49 I SX457.70 921,iq.4il OCHEDULE D: STREET CONSTRUCTION I 003602 OIiA7NlAr1 SORROW (CSI I 3700 CU YD $ 50 $70.758.00 570 921,00088 am 927.31000 1 AOOnMO TE DAD[ CLASS 5 71 GALS COS1RSfi MIxTURE .rA TON OCs TON__ _ _4.82 15,41 921.402.00.0.43 117,7CS CS _ 19.50110.107.00 __$25.057.50 4.02 15.41 $21,407.00 $17.7cs Cs W WEM7N0 00UR^,IEM1xTm oMINOMUS - 700 TONl 00.51 $14,707,00n.70 917,004.00 00.51 $14,mA0 MATERIAL FOA TACK COAT 495 OALLON 640500 1.00 1,00 CO-! -- . T_ _4500 -IAO _ _ _ _Sm.00 _ _un'00 CUM S OUTTLR OCdOA1 D4 LIN IT _ 471 _ 111,974A0 _ 4 50 _ {10.]3000 4.70 �514p1A0 REMOVE AND RCWOTAl10MNCADEa _ R7PAIR _ 10000 080.00 (IAO__ _ -1247.00 - 6000--616000 IICRU6 HEO ROCK • 1 VY CLEAR I0 CU YD 10,00 6144W h 00 5770.OD 1500 {110.00 IUTAL IA MWL5 MI OTAEET CON5TRUCTION I OWTA1 910/,579.$9 511,10.M PD o112 STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY PROJECT NO. 9S -06C WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 4892-60 Ilan Spee No DaxAptim ISCHEDULE E: SITE GRADOW NO105.S_01ISITE GRADING P5 A5 78mosow 10 :0 02106odsce o :712575. 021 GILT FEMCE. HEAVY DUTY NS 2575. WOOD FIOEn m KET TYPE IIEGULAn �0 2572.50 DALE CHECK I ITOTAL SCHEDULE E. WE GRADING IDASE DID: SCHEDULES A THAW E Extension of Bids Bid Date: April 21, 1995 10:00 A.M. Denotes corrected figure. Pe 1 of 12 W&AIL80 I 8TH BIDDER 9TH BIDDER 10TH BIDDER R. P. UTILITIES. INC. LATOUR CONSTR.. INC. R.1. LARSON EXCA.. INC. Tad M sm'020.15 Tod Old. 1052.002.62 rad BIO: $3S5,2t0.00 0..Wq UNI W Hln tan Tole W Psae Item Tata W Pf" Ilan T IIIHNPSIM 87.770.00 07,770m 1 68 UM 865.50.00 15,000.00 17q,000.00 POOR EO YD 1.50 64.710_00 1.51 84.403A0 1.0 64,50.00 45 ACRF am 00_St0,o0000 419.00 SIOA 00 400.00 110.000.00 woo LIN FT 220 .-1.25^ 64,400:0 9-- to _64.200.00 220 Wall0 POO SO YO 825000 f.00 820_00 1.20 $3SOAO 50 EACH 5.00 $3000 an $310.00 SAO $300.00 womm I u7.12L/2 1114.2mm 0110 l 0.00 smoo I Pe 1 of 12 W&AIL80 I Po{ 0 of 12 Extension of Bids Bid Date: April 21, 1995 10:00 A.M. STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION "Denotes corrected figure. CfTV OF MONTICELLO CITU PROJECT NO. 95-OBC WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 489260 11TH BIDDER 12TH BIDDER ounsc mLLF coNsm., i Nc. RANDY KRAMER ExcAv., INC. Tall M. $759X18.50 raw EN: 5389,797.19 Item Span No 0AA000m 0uw" UNI LIM PArn W. Td•. 1100 Pd- 84111 T0101 IBCNEDULE A: 8ANRARY 6EW'ER 19105.$4 ORANULAn FOUNDATION MAT'ERAL 200 TON 0.00 $1,12040 14.00 92A00.m 2 7021. 5'IL4• PVC WYE 75 EACH 75.00 f1?2'S,00 60_04 $1,751.40 7m1.66666000000000011111Exru4T OU. M.HOCPTHOvEn 1C 19.4 LUN FT am A0 00.:0 $004.0 _70_00 42691, STA UDAP04'9ANRARV MAW VW (0-' 11 EACH 1,2_5,00 SUZ00.00 1,610.00 - $10,704.00 62021.511'4• PVC PIPE $EWER 6Dn Q4 BERWCE pm 1500 LW fT $10,500.00m 10,500.00 7.85 {11,775.00 07021.511 - pVCPIPEDCWEA9on35 19UNFT _7,00 22.00$4145440D 14,74 a$,1m.101 710M.11. 100NNCCT TO EX19TNG IAANHOLUSTU0 7 EACH 250.00 1?woo 000,00 $1,55.5 tlLHLUULS AI 'MAL SANITARY SEWER i $04.61740 WA"A$ ' ISCHEOULE D: WATERMAM 0 0504. _ l W CURD DTOP i DDx 1 EACH _ _1W.5 $15040 170.05 1120.05 _0 2011,yp�}C-ONN-CCT TOEXUTNO WATCR MAIN - - - -- 0 EACH _1m,00 _ _L m00 750.00 $1,050.00 10 HYDRANT 7 [AC1I 1.15000 _p.45000 1.4_79,40 $4.710.90 11 9011. _ LPo2EMTKINSTOP - _ _ 74 EACII _�_ 95.00 �- {05000 -410000 _77.0 $1,274.72 71, 12 "11.01 CDMOMTm STOP 1 EACH 1000C-- 101.70 $101.70 t: 2011. _ 0' OATS VALVE - AND BOX 5 EACH _77_6.00-_- �_ f1A74E0 X5.5 a.DM.m 14 9011. C OATS VALVE AIR OOX 0 EACH m p,57$ 00 x7,45 31 EACH _470 70.001012611. VALVEOOX EIRENSION I.5 LMR 70.00 $14000 5.17 9011, '7 H-Y-DRANT EXTCNSIO N 9.5 LINFT__950.00. M-OD 107.79 M7011.0 I TYPE K COPPER {RAPE UNF7 700 $10.00000 7.n 211,102011, __ _ _ _1440 _ _ ^ 1 s. TYPE K COPPTR PIPE ____ _, __ _.-_OC LIN FT .-- _-10.00 _ _ $500,00 9,77 "1,5_0 f WATCR%WN4U TOION CIp 57 LIN FT _ ID.m 111416100 1741 •194 21 Moll.. CWATCn AIAUF�DUCT p10NCLL7__ N10f0.m_ -_._p1,100m _.10.10 ap _765,00 9920,1. 4' POLYOTYRLNewCIAATiOF1. �_ . Ifb CO!ID _.14.ms p,>taoN70 i$.0 a.710,00 232011 RNCTR.E IRON FMDM 14W IA. IAO 11.4ma0 9.00 82 OW O I Po{ 0 of 12 PDI; 0112 Extension o1 Bids Bid Date: April 21, 1995 10:00 AM, STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION "Denotes corrected figure. CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY PROJECT NO. 95-06C WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 4892.60 11TH BIDDER 12TH BIDDER OURSCMVILLE CONSTR.. INC. RANDY KRAMER EXCAV„ INC. TOW DW: 050.M.50 TOW Bid: MQ,3a7.12 Ilam SW.. Dowipti- O,m00N 1MI1 `I UN P1ke Ram Totm ' Ura Pdee Ile. T ITOTAL SCHEDULE B: WATERMAIN 636,9]4,00 I $0.120.70 I SCHEDULE C: STORM SEWER ! 247501.51$ 24' RC PIPE APRON W/rRAOH GUARD 11 F:ACH_ 700.00 6700.00 1.156.44 $1,155.44 25 2507.541112• nC PPC w::.Tn :.'.^.ICN ]000 CL V t_7,LItJ lQ.NI T2,456.16 I 20 Ki 2503.341 t5' RC PIPC SCWCn OESN 3000 CL V 30 LIN R_ 19.50 _ _$565.00 -2 ".5 pIt7,40 77 230].741116' RC PIPE SCWEn OEDICN ]000 CL V 120 LIN FT $2.040.00 72.001 $2.755.20 - 2403.541121' nC PIPC SEVJCn OCSK:N_]OW cL 74 LIN FT _72.00 2400 $1,77600 61,92_9,02 x-26 - _ - - -60.626.00 _ _26,06 20 250].b/t.l• RC PS'C CLVECn OESICN 7000 CL IU- - -_ ]04 LIN FT_ _77.00 20_00 $10,102.00 30 2300. CONSCATCH OASIN 7,CACM 60000u, .�.00 31 _-_-_ 6. 2500.5:00tCOtMTRL,CT MANHOLED OCOICN 44020 4ICACII _ _ 1,75000 _-- - _ -%3,000 ,00 .]7 �,205.20 F a." 2500500 CONSTnl1CT MANHOLE DCSWN 3b40.^0 - --' - - 1 CAC/1 _ 1.750.630 _1,071 1.ats.04 {1.e16.01 _33 2511.501 CL 7 RIP MP WCIRO QNCLO, CnADINO)_ _ 05 CU YO -- 00.00 _--_ _$1.760.00 __$5,100,00 _ 42.00 63,370.00 34 1 11,501 nAN00M RIPMP CLASS III WITH FABRIC - - - - - • - - - ` - `- - - 6430.00 77.00 _ _ 0170.00 35 IV. M11 DPvc 00049LMN 100 LM rT 0.00 000.00 6.67 $003.00 Lt L3 (lUl STORM SEWER ! {]6.$11.00 I 636,0{0.76 ! (SCHEDULE 0: STREET CONSTRUCTION I I 3019,03.52ScCLCCT CRANULAn TOIRIlOYI ICV) _ 63700 CU YO 6 C0 9' 0,72000 _ 6.03 311Q7tt.fglltADORCDATC MCC CLASS 5 _ __-435011ON __6124 -- 171.117.50 --- -e.1/$27,469.50 2]]�-,.--6.�1--(t}}TV--PC•a1CASE COtIII!.'C W3 xTUnv 90 TON •`_ atm'-- Ct0-M.00 10.11 6fe.c5a.43 �B,II]71.60E7YPE 1 wFA11INo_COUnL'G YIl(TURE_ .. - - -720 TOII _ 2300 _ _ _ {10.SW.aO 71.54 _ _6155 6,A0 01=_ 3}1 3 MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT_ -_~_ 463 GALLON 1.00 _ -_._4,60_- •_ _ 605A0 _- _-1.05 - -6375 00 nETE CUnO AOLtTTCR OCCN3N OI UNR- - {19,]30.00 4.7_0 $201007.00 2)9054, nFMOVE.1740REIN_STALL DAMICACCO _ V_ - Y _4300 �_ ]PAIR _- e t0000_-- - 6300.00 20000 {COO.OD - _- _--!{IO2,00 4] 045140 ,CRUEHED HOCK • t UT CLCAA tII CUYO 16,00 6160,00 10.00 i V IAL BLMLVULU U. STREET CONSTRUCTION 6104637.60 910463940 PDI; 0112 STREETS, UTILITIES AND APPURTENANT WORK CARDINAL HILLS STH ADDITION CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY PROJECT NO. 95 -OBC WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 4892.60 {4m am No onciptim I I I IecHEouu ru we ORAoma M ASMTFE ORE rRAOMO 45 SODOM a SLCOMo 47 NCE. HEAVY DUTY M WOOOFWnMANKETTVPEOCOUL M Q577IA�DAL8 C14ECK II TOTAL ECNEDtU & VTM 004DMO I I �BASS 00 SMDULES A TKU D Extension of Bids Bid Dale: ApA 21,1995 10:00 A.M. Denotes coRecled flpure. 0 ( Pi ? of 12 11TH BIDDER 12TH BIDDER tiURSCFMLIP CONSTR.. INC. RANDY KRAMER QLCAV., MC. TON OIk "59,22{.50 am W. g09=At Oumay um L%A {1N Umm T LVA Prim tNm T 1 LIMP SUN 70,000AO {70=W 80.700.00 {!0.100.m 900090 YO 7.75 96.01 SAO 1.49 64,321.W 25 ACRE 450.00 _ _ _ — {11 X50.00 464.00 {12.10100 00 00LM FT _ _ 015 $4.500.00 2.00 $4,t00.00 200 00 YD to _ 6400.00 _f—{400.00 1.20 SMA 50 EACH 100 0.00 amm 107,7{5.00 {101/1101 {OAO {DAO "{{.{2150 838W.12 0 ( Pi ? of 12 Council Agenda - 4/24/96 12. Consideration of s} re@slvjtion pgthorlxing sale of General obligation improvement ponds. Series 1995A. for various improvement yr-olects• (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: With the City being involved in six improvement projects scheduled for 1995, we are nearing the time where we will need to sell bonds to finance these improvements. As a result, I have requested that Springsted, Inc., the City's bond consultant, prepare some recommendations for the City Council to consider regarding the structuring of the bonds to cover our improvement projects. It is anticipated that Mr. Jerry Shannon of Springsted, Inc., will be in attendance at the meeting to go over the recommendations with the City Council. It is projected that the 6 improvement projects will require financing needs of $3,890,000 to be paid back over a period of 10 years. The bonds will cover the cost of constructing the Meadow Oak pond storm sewer outlet project, the Eastwood Knoll improvement project, the Southwest Area utilities extension, the Klein Fars improvements, OcellwSchool Boulevard improvement project, and finally the Cardinal Hills 6th Addition project. By Monday night, the City will have awarded or received bids on five of the six projects, with the Ocello/School Boulevard improvement being the only project left to bid. Of the total cost to be financed, it is estimated that the assessments will total approximately $2.9 million of the $3.9 million bond issue. The balance of approximately $1 million will be repaid by ad valorem tax levies over the next 10 years. Although we're at the point where we don't have a lot of choice concerning whether to issue a bond or not, there is pending state legislation being considered proposing a tax levy freeze for taxes collectable in 1998, which does have a minor effect on this bond sale. With approximately 25% of the total bonds needed to be repaid through tax levies, the proposed tax freeze would not allow us to levy additional taxes in 1996 for collection in 1996 and also could limit the total city tax levy increase to only 3% in 1996 collectable 1997. This type of legislation could have an effect in the future on the City's ability to levy enough money to pay for our share of the improvement project coat we're now doing without requiring us to cut into other services we're providing. Hopefully any property tax legislation that freezes taxes at the current level will only be short-term and not restrict us more than a year or two. Tm sure that Monticello is not the only community in the state that is facing these uncertainties, but I just wanted the Council to be aware that it does require us to restructure the debt payment a little differently by stretching out the payments longer than we would have had to without this property tax freeze possibility. Council Agenda - 4/24/95 It is also noted in the recommendation that although the bonds will be payable over ten years and so will the assessments against benefiting property owners, we are also assuming that there will be some prepayment of special assessments from the Eastwood Knoll development, Itlein Farms development, and Cardinal Hills 5th Addition. These developments will likely build many homes and pay off the assessments long before the ten- year time period; and as a result, some of the debt repayment will occur over a seven-year time frame rather than over ten years. In addition, should the City have a large amount of prepayments, a call feature is also included in the bond sale allowing us to pay off some of the debt as early as the year 2001. This way, if the assessments are paid back to the City early, we wouldn't have to wait the full ten years to pay off our debt. 13A.LTERNATIVE ACrWM The first alternative would be to adopt a resolution authorizing Springsted, Inc., to proceed with the bond sale of $3,890,000 as recommended with the bids returnable May 22, 1995. J4 ;Ir' :H Do not authorize a bond sale at this time. C. STAFF RECOMME Since it appears that we are continuing ahead with many of these improvement prefects by awarding contracts and acoepting bids, we really have no choice but to issue a bond to finance the improvements. Although it certainly is a concern of mine that the legislators can still come up with a property tax freeze proposal that could be detrimental to us in the future by not allowing us the ability to raise additional taxes to cover our portion of this bond sale, 1 think we have to forge ahead with the sale under the assumption that any potential legislation may exempt bond debt from levy limitations or, at a minimum, allow us to levy additional amounts in the year 1997 to make up for any shortfalls in 1998. Under the recommendation presented, it is imperative that these projects be completed to the point where we can accurately determine the amounts to be assessed this fall so that the special assessments can begin collections in the year 1998. This revenue will be needed next year to make our first debt payments, and the staff will be under a tight time table to get all the project costs together for an assessment hearing this fall. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of recommendations from Springeted; Copy of proposed resolution to be adopted. Recommendations For City of Monticello, Minnesota $3,890,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1995A Study No. M057602 SPRINGSTED Incorporated April 19,1998 Recommendations for City of Monticello, Minnesota $3,890,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1995A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This summary is intended to highlight data contained in these recommendations. It is intended to be an adjunct to the recommendations and not to be used solely as the basis of determination of actions required. Your actions should be based on the information more fully set forth in the recommendations. 1. Action Requested 2. Type and Purpose of Offering 3. Principal Amount of Offering 4. Repayment Term 5. Source of Debt Service Revenues 8. Optional Redemption 7. Credit Rating Comments 8. Sale Date and Tlrne 9. Award Date and Time 10. Comments To establish the date and time of receiving bids and establish the terms and conditions of the Offering. Proceeds of the issue will be used to finance construction of six Improvement projects within the City. $3,890,000 February 1, 1997 through 2008. Special assessments against benefited property and general ad valorem tax levies. Bonds maturing on February 1, 2002 through 2008 will be callable on February 1, 2001, and any day thereafter, at a price of par. A rating application wUl be made to Moodys Inventors Service Monday, May 22, 1995 at 12:30 P.M. Monday, May 22. 1995 at 7:00 P.M. Under proposed legislation, disputed le these rocommendations, the City cannot make a new debt service levy for this Issue in 1995. Therefore, the bands have been structured to ellmUwte the requirement for a 1995 tax levy. (9) .1 8S E. SEVENTH PLACE, SUITE 100 SAINT PAUL, MN SS101-2143 612.223-3000 FAX: 612.223.1002 April 19, 1995 Honorable Brad Fyle, Mayor Members, City Council Mr. Richard Wolfstefler, City Administrator City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55382-9245 SPRINGSTED Public Finals Adwm3 Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of $3,890,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1995A We respectfully request your consideration of our recommendations for the issuance of these general obligation improvement bonds in accordance with the attached Terns of Proposal. The bonds are being Issued under Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475 and will be general obligations of the City. Pending State Legislation to Freeze Property Taxes The Omnibus Tax Bill, as passed by the State Senate, would freeze property tax values and tax rates for taxes payable In 1998 and further limit property tax increases for taxes payable in 1997 to 3%. This proposed legislation prohibits the Issuance of new debt by municipalities after March 30, 1995, if the new debt requires a 1995/98 tax levy to be made. The Citys Bond Counsel has determined the City may proceed with the sale of this issue. Under the proposed legislation, the City will not be able to make a new debt service levy for repayment of this Issue in 1995. Therefore, the principal repayment of the bonds has been structured to eliminate a levy requirement in 1995. All payments due on the bonds through February 1, 1997 (paid from a 1995 levy) will be made from the collection of special assessments. The repayment of the City's sham of project casts has been amortized over nine years beginning with the 1998 levy. Structure of the Bonds Attached as Appendix 1 to a listing of the We Improvement projects being financed at this time, the project costa for each Improvement, the amount to be Ixmded and the projected assessments by project. Mr. WoBsteller has Indicated that significant prepayments of special assessments aro expected over the next several years on three of the six Improvement projects: 94-02C (Eastwood Knell), 95-028 (Klein Farts) and 95-08C (Cardinal Hills 5th 3.UNTPAU1,14A • MNNEAPOUS MN • tWOCRUAWI • aaXANDPARX,Xf • WAS1WXMN,DC • IOM'ACrrX 42 City of Monticello, Minnesota April 19, 1995 Addition). Therefore, for structuring purposes we have assumed assessments on these three projects will be collected over a shorter term of seven years. This assessment structure results in larger projections of assessment income in the earlier years of the bonds and subs Mentty results in larger principal payments to match the assessment projections. Assessments for all projects are expected to be filed in October of 1995 for first collection in 1998. Appendix 11 shows the projection of assessment income. Assessments will be filed over a period of 10 years, in the total principal amount of approximately $2,880,148. As discussed in the prior paragraph, assessments for three of the improvement projects are assumed to be collected over a tens of seven years for structuring purposes. The amount to be assessed includes a pro -rata share of the costs of issuance. Assessments are structured with even annual principal and interest on the unpaid balance is charged at a rate of 1.50% over the net interest rate on the bonds, consistent with the City's policy. For projection purposes we have used a rate of 8.70%. Appendix III is our recommended maturity schedule for this Issue. The bonds are dated June 1, 1995 and will mature each February 1, 1997 through 2008. Columns 1 through 8 stow the levy and maturity years, principal payments, Interest rates and payment of principal and Interest. Interest rates shown in Column 4 are current market rates and are subject to change between now and the sale date. Column 7 shows the debt service, Including the 5% overievy. The overlevy is required by State statute and is a protection to the City and the bondholders to the event that 100% of assessments and taxes are not collected as expected. Column 8 Is the projection of assessment income developed in Appendix II. Column 9 shows the net requirement which represents the City's share of project costs. The City will be required to levy approximately $184,700 annually beginning in levy year 1998, for this issue. Any surplus of assessment income, as shown In Column 10, will be available to make debt service payments on the bonds in subsequent years. There Is currently a provision in the proposed senate tax bill which would restrict the City's 1998 levy to not more than 3% of the 1994 levy. To 13he extent this provision is enacted, the City would be required to use either additional prepayments of assessments or to make a temporary transfer of available funds of the City to be repaid over a future period of time. As an alternative, the principal payment due in 1997 could be reduced by approximately $100,000 which amount would be amortized over the remaining 7 years, increasing the current projected average levy by approximately $15,000 per year. The first interest payment on the bonds Is due February 1, 1998 In the approximate amount of $127,843. This payment Is due prior to the first receipt of special assessment cogedona in 1998 and will be made from special assessments prepayments or a temporary transfer of other available City monies which will be repaid upon receipt of the first-half collodion of assessments in 1998. The subsequent August 1, 1998 and February1, 1997 Interest payments will also be made from assessments collected in 1998. Thereafter, each August 1 interest payment will be made from first-half collections of assessments and taxes and each February 1 prindpel and interest payment will be made from second -half collections, together with surplus first-half oollectlons. Allowance for Discount We have Included an allowance for underwriter's discount of $48,825 or 1.25% of the prindpal amount of the bonds. The discount provides the underwriters with all or part of I:11heir profit and/or working capital for purchasing the issue and permits them to reolfer the bonds to the Investing public at a price of par. The City has successfully used the discount biddbV approach In the past, and In our experience, allowing discount bidding results in ower Interest rates than requiring underwriters to bid par or a premium. Page City of Monticello, Minnesota April 19, 1995 Prepayment Provision We also recommend that bonds maturing in the years 2002 through 2008 representing $1,715,000 or 44% of the issue, be callable by the City as early as February 1, 2001 at a price of par. This short call feature will permit early repayment of the bands if the City receives significant prepayments of special assessments. Rating We recommend that the City request a rating from Moody's Investors Service for this issue. The City is currently rated "A" by Moody s. The rating fee, estimated at $8,500, has been included as a cost of issuance in the bond issue. Moody's will bill the City directly for the rating. Book Entry We recommend the bonds be Issued as "book entry only" obligations through the Midwest Securities Trust Company of Chicago. Under the book entry system, the holders of the obligations will not receive printed bonds but Will have only a record from the broker/dealer stating they are held by the depository. The use of the book entry system eliminates all caste to the City for printing physical bonds. Although the bonds are issued in book entry form, which also eliminates the need for the registrar, we recommend the City retain a registrar for a nominal fee to send the City reminder notices indicating the date and amount of the payments coming due and to act as an intermediary with the depository, should the need arise. We can assist the City in the process of selecting a registrar. Federal Rebate • Arbitrage Rebate All tax-exempt bonds are subject to federal arbitrage regulations. Including rebating arbitrage profits to the U.S. Treasury. Generally speaking, all arbitrage profits (the yield difference between the earnings on the Investments and the yield on the obligations) must be rebated to the U.S. Treasury. There are some exemptions to this rebate requirement which Include: A small issuer exemption If the obligations aro for governmental purposes and the Issuer reasonably expects to Issue not more than 55,000,000 tax-exempt obligations during the calendar year. (ii) A six-month exemption if all of the proceeds of the obligations aro expended within six months of issuance of the obligations. (Iii) An 18 -month expenditure test if at least 15% of the proceeds aro expended within 8 months, 60% within 12 months and 100% within 18 months. (tv) A two-year expenditure test if at bast 75% of the proceeds of the Issue aro used for construction and If 10% is expended within six months, 45% within 12 months, 75% within 18 months and 100% within two years. For items (til) and (N), If it Is reasonably required that a retainage be maintained to enforce the completion of a contract, up to 5% of the proceeds may be retained for an additional 12 months. Net proceeds subject to these expenditure tests Include Investment comings on the original bond proceeds. Page /i City of Monticello, Minnesota April 19, 1995 The City expects to meet the small issuer test (i) above, and will therefore be exempt from reporting and rebate requirements. Yield Restriction Debt service funds created to pay debt service on new issues are subject to yield restriction unless they fall under the definition of 'bona fide' debt service funds as described below. Prior to the 1993 Pinar arbitrage regulations released in June 1893, the small issuer exemption had exempted any debt service funds from yield restriction requirements. The 1993 regulations now permit only bona floe debt service funds to be exempt from yield restriction. A bona fide debt service fund is defined as a fund for which there is an equal matching of revenue to debt service expense with a carryover permitted equal to the greater of the investment earnings In the fund during that year or 1112 of the debt service of that year. A debt service fund can lose its bona fide status if the issuer accumulates too much investment earnings or prepayments of assessments. Therefore, accumulations of special assessments and prepayments in the debt service fund should be used to call the bonds, if possible, or the yield on those funds will have to be restricted to the yield on the bonds. The 1993 final arbitrage regulations brought all tax-exempt issues Into the calculation of 'economic life.' Previously this requirement was only for private acthrity bonds. The Intent of this requirement is to limit tax-exempt issues which are outstanding longer than is necessary, thus creating more tax-exempt bonds to the marketplace than are needed. The general safe harbor for assuring that bonds comply with the regulations Is if the average maturity of the bonds does not exceed 120% of the economic Ufa of the financed projects. The bonds are issued for street and utility improvements, which, under the U.S. Treasury guidelines, have economic lives of 20 or 50 years, respectively. Since this issue has an average maturity of 5.91 years, it is in compliance with this regulation. Federal Reimbursement Regulations The U.S. Treasury has enacted reimbursement regulations to regulate Issuers who wish to issue tax-exempt bonds to recover costs of prior expenditures. The reimbursement regulations require that if the issuer proposes to reimburse teff for expenses they paid prior to receipt of bond proceeds, it must have made a declaration of that Intent within 60 days of the actual payment of the expense. There aro exemptions for architectural and engineering fees and miscellaneous start-up costs. It is our understanding the City is aware of these regulations and has taken the necessary action to comply with the federal reimbursement regulations In regard to this issue. Bank -Qualified Obligations The Tax Reform Act of 1986 restricts the ability of banks to deduct tax-exempt interest as s carrying expense under certain circumstances in cabculating their tax "Illy. However, the Act allows certain bonds to be qualified bonds which can be Included In a bank's calculation of interest deduction. That qualification Is reserved for munldpalitles that will Issue baa than $/0,000.000 of tax-exempt debt within a calendar year. The City does not expect to exceed this $10,000.000 limit In 1995, and therefore this Issue will be bank-clualitbd. This quaGflcatiort will help the marketability of the issue. P090 City of Monticello, Minnesota April 19, 1995 Bond Sale Procedure Springsted Incorporated, together with Capital Guaranty Insurance Company, a municipal bond insurer, will again offer a surety bond service, 'Sure -Bid; to underwriters In lieu of putting up a good faith check in order to bid on the bonds. In addition to allowing underwriters to submit their bids by mail or telephone, we will also allow them to submit bids through PARITY, an electronic bid filing process. SpMgsted has access to the bids via modem and will verify and tabulate the bids received to determine the winning bid. We have allowed for the use of Sure - Bid and PARITY in the Terms of Proposal, attached to these recommendations. We believe that the use of these bidding options may attract more bids for the bond sale. since it reduces administrative barriers for an underwriter to bid. There Is no cost to the City for these services and Springsted does not have a firmncial interest in the use of Suns -Bid or PARITY. We recommend these bonds be offered for sale on Monday, May 22, 1995, with proposals received at the offices of Springsted Incorporated at 12:30 P.M. After proposals are received, they will be opened, verified for accuracy, tabulated and than presented to the City Council for eonstderation of award at 7:00 P.M. the same evening. Proceeds will be available approximately 30 days later. Respectfully submitted, SPRINGSTEO Incorporated cjb City of Monticello; Minnesota General Obligation Improvement Bonds. Series 19M Flus: Total Costs Project Project Costs of to be Assessments Prolect Costa (a) Isauence Financed (b) Notes Regarding Assessments 92-12C Meadow oak Fond Assessments to be filed in Oct.1995 Storrs Sewer Outlet $418.815 $3,642 $422,357 $84,472 over a tens of 10 years. Assessments to be fled In Oct.1995 94-02C Eastwood Knoll Impr. over a term of 10 years, with bonds (resider ital pn4—Q 418,000 3,518 419,616 416,384 sbucAued for seven year collectlon. 95 -OIC Southwest Area 11tHMes Assessments lo be filed in Oct. 1995 Extwubn 211,435 1,788 213,223 98,608 over a term of 10 years. Assessments to be filed in Oct. 1995 95-02C Klein Farms Impr. over a term of 10 years, with bonds ()hese I - msideWA 1,183,000 10,004 1,193,004 973,647 structured for seven year col lection. Assessments to be filed In Oct. 1995 95-03C OceffolSchoolBlvd. hMr. 1,187,000 10,038 1,197,038 909,287 over aterm M10yews. Assessments b be filed in Oct. 1995 95-06C Cardind Hills 6th Addn. over a term of 10 years, with bonds (residerdlat pM=Q 397,600 3,361 400,881 397,850 stnichrred for sawn year collection. Subtotal $3,813,7110 $32,260 $3,848,1100 $2,880,148 Rus: Atbwaneebr Olaoo urd Bidding 48,625 Leas: Invsatmerl Eamtnp [4.828) Total Bond "us D Motes(a) &=Ax vs enylrwabrp bn and cont6 ryanabs, dY$f (b) indoles Pro -rave share of costs of lesuarms. g sued by: SPRINGSTEO lrroorporded (17 -Apr -fib ) J City of Monticello, Minnesota 00 Improvement Bonds, Series 1995A Filing Collect Year Year 1995 1998 1998 1997 1997 1998 1998 1999 1999 2000 2000 2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 , TOTALS PROJECTED ASSESSMENT INCOME 10 Year Assets Over 10 Years Filing Date: 10/15/1995 Interest Principal 0 8.700% Total 109,237 88,8298 198,088 109,237 85,870 175,107 109,237 58,551 187,788 109,237 51,232 180,489 109,737 43,913 153,150 109,237 38,594 145,831 109,237 29,275 138,512 109,237 21,950 131,193 109,237 14,838 123,875 109,234 7,319 118,553 1,092,387 418,177 1,510,544 a) Includes Interest from filing date to 12/31/1998. 10 Year Assorts Over 7 Years Filing Date: 10/15/1995 Interest Principal 0 8.700% Total 255,397 145,378D 400,775 255,397 102,870 358,087 255,397 85,558 340,955 255,397 88,447 323,844 255,397 51,335 308,732 255,397 34,223 289,820 255,399 17,112 272,511 1,787,781 504,723 2,292,504 D) Includes Interest from filing date to 12/31/1998. Prepared April 17, 1995 By SPRINOSTED Incorporated . . . . T 0 T A L - - - - - Principal Interest Total 384,834 234,207 598,841 384,834 188,540 533,174 384,834 144,109 508,743 384,834 119,979 484,313 384,834 95,248 459,882 384,834 70,817 435,451 384,838 48,387 411,023 109,237 21,950 131,193 109,237 14,838 123,875 109,234 7,319 118,553 2,880,148 922,900 3,803,048 City of Monticello, Minnesota Prepared April 17, 1995 G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series t995A By SPRINOSTED Incorporated Dated: 8. 1.1995 Mature: 2. 1 First Interest: 2. 1.1998 Total Projected Total Year of Year of Principal 1051 Assessment Not Annual Levy Mat. Principal Rates Interest 8 Interest of Total Income Requirement Surplus (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (e) (7) (B) (9) (10) 1995 1997 245,000 4.50% 319,808 584,808 592,938 598,841 O 8,003 1998 1998 485,000 4.80% 180,740 885,740 899,027 533,174 185,853 0 1997 1999 485,000 4.75% 158,430 843,430 875,802 508,743 188,859 0 1998 2000 480,000 4.85% 135,392 815,392 848,182 484,313 181,849 0 1999 2001 480,000 4.05% 112,112 592,112 821,718 459,882 181,83:3 0 2000 2002 485,000 5.05% 88,352 573,352 802,020 435,451 188,589 0 2001 2003 485,000 5.10% 83,859 548,859 578,302 411,023 185,279 0 2002 2004 245,000 5.15% 39,124 284,124 298,330 131,193 187,137 0 2003 2005 245,000 5.25% 28,508 271,508 285,081 123,875 181,206 0 2004 2008 255,000 5.35% 13,843 288,843 282,075 118,553 185,522 0 TOTAL$: 3,890,000 1,137,788 5,027,788 5,279,155 3,803,048 1,482,110 Bond Years: 22,803.33 Annual Interest: 1,137,788 Avg. Maturity: 5.81 Plus Discount: 48,825 Avg. Annual Rate: 5.034% Net Interest: 1,188,391 T.I.C. Rate: 5.277% M.I.C. Rate: 5.249% Interest rates are estimates; changes may cause significant alterations of this schedule. The actual underwriter's discount bid say also vary. THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $3,880,000 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES I"aA (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, May 22, 1995, until 12:30 P.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, atter which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (612) 223.3002 to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (612) 223-3000 or fax (612) 223.3002 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. Proposals may also be filed electronically via PARITY, in accordance with PARITY Rules of Participation and the Terms of Proposal, within a one-hour period prior to the Urns of sale established above, but no Proposals will be received after that time. If provisions in the Terns of Proposal conflict with the PARITY Rules of Participation, the Terms of Proposal shall control. The normal fee for use of PARITY may be obtained from PARITY and such fee shag be the responsibility of the bidder. For further information about PARITY, potential bidders may contact PARITY at 100 116th Avenue SE, Suite 100, Bellevue, Washington 98004, telephone (206) 635.3545. Neither the City nor Springsted Incorporated assumes any liability if there is a malfunction of PARITY. All bidders aro advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless of the manner of the Proposal submitted. DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated June 1, 1995, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 19%. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 1997 $245,000 2001 5480,000 2005 $245,000 1998 $485,000 2002 $485,000 2008 5255,000 1999 $485,000 2003 $485,000 2000 $480.000 2004 $245,000 Page 9 BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bonds, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Kray 8 Co. as nominee of Midwest Securities Trust Company ("MSTC'), Chicago, Illinois, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of 35,1100 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of MSTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to MSTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of MSTC will be the responsibility of MSTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of defivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the Bonds with MSTC. The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. The City may elect on February 1, 2001, and on arty day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2002. Redemption may be in whole or in part and 0 in part at the option of the City and in such manner as the City shell determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notiy, MSTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. MSTC will determine by lot the amount of each participants Interest In such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. AA prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City WO pledge special assessments against benefited property. The proceeds will be used to finance various improvement projects within the City. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not less than $3,841,375 and accrued Interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit's in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond In the amount of $38,800, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, It must be from an Insurance company licensed to issue such a bond In the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Furandi Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Sprinpsted Incorporated In the form of a certified or cashlers check or Wre transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P,M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. I1 such Oeposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satiety the Deposit requirement. The City will deposit the cheek of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no Interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, sold amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can Pope 1 be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or Continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The Citys Computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with Customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (I) waive non -substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without Cause, and, (fin) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Bonds quality for issuanoe of any policy of municipal bond insurance or Commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the Issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased costs of Issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bonds nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Holmes & Greven, Chartered of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary dosing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the date of seMment payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or Its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as Compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. Page 11 �� OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the separation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds. and said Official Statement wig serve as a nearly -final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional Information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telaotne (6 12) 2233000. The 01ficial Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying tho maturity dates, prh cfpal amounts and Interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall cartatib to a 'Final Official Statement' of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that tens is defined in Rule 15x2-12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days abler the date of such award, it shag provide wftut cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndcate to which the Bonds are awarded 155 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Oftal Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if Its pmposal is accepted by the City m it shag accept such designation and (0 it shag enter Into a contractual relationshipwith d Participating Underwriters dthe Bonds for purposes of assuring the, by each such Participating Underwriter of the Front CiRldal Statement. Dated April 24, 1995 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /a/ Richard Wolfeteller Administrator pap I /� N Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, was held at the City Hall In the City on Monday, April 24, 1995, commencing at 7:00 o'clock P.M. The following members of the Council were present: and the following were absent: The following resolution was presented by Councilmember who moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $3,990,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1995A BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of tho City of Monticello. Wright County. Minnesota (City) as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that: (a) the following assessable public Improvements (the Improvements) have been trade, duly ordered or contracts let for the construction thereof, by the City pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 (Act); &M73M 0iw-u 9 i Proiect Desianstion 6 Description: Total Costs 92-12C Meadow Oak Pond Storm Seger Outlet : 422,357 94-02C Eastwood Knoll Improvement (residential project) 419,818 95 -OIC Southwest Areca Utilities Extension 213,223 95-02C Klein Farms Improvement (phase I -residential) 1,193,004 98-03C Ocello/School Blvd. Improvement 1,197,038 98-0BC Cardinal Hills 5th Addition (residential Project) 400`880 Subtotal $3,848,000 Plus: Allowance for Discount Bidding 48,825 Iasa: Investment Fernings (4.828) Total Bond Issue =3,890,000 (b) Itis necessary and expedlent to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue $3,890,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1995A (Bonds) pursuant to the Act to provide financing for the Improvements. 2. To provide financing for the Improvements, the City will issue and sell Bonds in the amount of $3,841,375. To provide in pert the additional interest required to market the Bonds at We time, additional Bonds will be issued in the amount of $48,825. The excess of the purchase price of the Bonds over the sum of $3,841,378 will be credited to the debt service fund for the Bonds for the purpose of paying interest first coming due on the additional Bonds. The Bonds will be issued, sold and delivered in accordance with the terms of the following Terms of Proposal: SM71o: IRrW4 9 THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $3,890,000 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1995A (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, May 22, 1995, until 12:30 P.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (812) 223-3002 to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (812) 223-3000 or fax (812) 223.3002 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. Proposals may also be filed electronically via PARITY, in accordance with PARITY Rules of Participation and the Terms of Proposal, within a one-hour period prior to the time of sale established above, but no Proposals will be received after that time. If provisions in the Terms of Proposal conflict with the PARITY Rules of Participation, the Terms of Proposal shall control. The normal fee for use of PARITY may be obtained from PARITY and such fee shall be the responsibility of the bidder. For further information about PARITY, potential bidders may contact PARITY at 100 118th Avenue SE, Suite 100, Bellevue, Washington 98004, telephone (208) 835.3545. Neither the City nor Springsted Incorporated assumes any liability if there is a malfunction of PARITY. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless of the manner of the Proposal submitted. DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated June 1, 1995, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 1998. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 1997 $245,000 2001 $480,000 2005 $245,000 1998 $485,000 2002 $485,000 2008 $255,000 1999 $485,000 2003 $485,000 2000 $480,000 2004 $245,000 BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM The Bonds will be Issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bonds, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Kray a Co. as nominee of Midwest Securities Trust Company ("MSTC'), Chicago, Illinois, which win act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of E5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of MSTC and its participants. Principal and Interest are payable by the registrar to MSTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of MSTC will be the responsibility of MSTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the Bonds with MSTC. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The City may elect on February 1, 2001, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2002. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify MSTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. MSTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interest$ in such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full fanh and credit and power to levy d,red general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge special assessments against benefited property. The proceeds will be used to finance various improvement projects within the City. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not lass than $3,841,375 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") in the form of a candied or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $38,800, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used. it must accompany each proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of tho proposals. Tho Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no Interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can - II - 9) be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8of 1%. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the Interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, M reject all proposals without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Bonds qualify for Issuance of any policy of municipal bond Insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the Issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any Increased costa of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond Insurer to Issue the policy atter Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bonds nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Holmes 8 Graven, Chartered of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary clostng papers, Including a no -litigation certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made Impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has euthorlred the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a hearty -final Official Statement within *w meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional infornation prior to sale, any prospective purchaser Is . Wei, to the Financial Advisor to the City. Springsted Incorporated. 85 East Severhth Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 2233000. The Offfdal Statement, when hnrther supplemented by an addendum or addenda speefying the maturity dates. principal amounts and Interest rates of the Bonds, togef;ar ") any other information required by law, shall constitute a 'Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds. as that tern Is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Bonds to any undenvrNer or udervvOV syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bond , are awarded 155 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior rtharvg underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as Its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwrit r. Any underwriter detvering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby OW if Its proposal Is scoepted by the City 0) it shall accept such designatiah and (a) it shall enter Into a contactual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Dated April 24, 1895 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /al Richard Wolfstel er Administrator S. Springsted Incorporated is authorised and directed to negotiate the Bonds in accordance with the foregoing Terms of Proposal. The City Council will meet at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on [Monday, May ZZ, 1885, to consider proposals on the Bonds and take any other appropriate action with respect to the Bonds. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon the following members voted in favor of the motion: and the following voted against: whereupon the resolution visa declared duly passed and adopted. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT CITY OF MONTICELLO I, the undersigned , being the duly qualified and acting City Administrator of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing eztract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on Monday, April 24, 1888, with the original minutes on file in my Ice and the extract Is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes, insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of $3,880,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds. Series 1895A of the City. WITNESS My hand as City Administrator and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 1885. (SEAL) amps" anso-u City Administrator City of Monticello, Minnesota Council Agenda - VM5 13. Cynsideration of terms of sale - Ontlot A. Country Club Manor - ]gavid Hornig. W.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the previous meeting of the City Council, David Hornig presented a counteroffer to the City staff proposal. The table that is attached shows the comparison between the proposals. Also attached is the summary of the original deal proposed by Hornig. &---ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the sale of the land under staff -recommended terms. Provide Hornig with a "take it or leave it" offer. 2. Motion to approve the sale of the land under the counter -proposal'` R i• submitted by Hornig. 3. Motion to withdraw the sale of the land from the marketplace. .s.) eS C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommendation is unchanged from the previous meeting, which is to select alternative 03. If not Q, then N1. See previous meeting report reasons behind support of alternative 03. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Table outlining alternatives I1 and i2; Summary of original Hornig proposal; Previous meeting staff report. is HORNIO/CITY TERMS OF SALE ALTERNATIVES OUTLOT A, COUNTRY CLUB MANOR Alt 02 May /9" AN #1 Hornig All 03 Orlairrel Staff Counter Withdraw Annual sign revenue Assumed to be City Hornig of $8,860/yr. City's urrIll development of portion of property containinq elan. (Purchase price $282,000 $303.150 $303,150 +1° Interest on contract Not determined 7.596 --) imonthly payment $1,885/mo. $1,833/mo. (Term of contract Not deterndned 5 years years IOwner-0ocupled $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 phase III o S HORNIO.WK4: 04/21/95 9 1 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION / COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OUTLOT A OF COUNTRY CLUB MANOR - 4/21/94 I I Itoawa I I COMMENTS I 6NELTER I I COMMENTS C, Per 5" Good Good sea OwB.'- .,pound: Develop« sea Good sae cow Guallaatlan: PHASE I - FAMILY APTS PNASEI- FAMILY APTS Total strumueaRam 5 7 Total until 42 37 Ave aq RltrNt 1,315 1.083 Total squaro R 38.490 40AW Bu0d4 Carol. 0071 i2A00,000 $1.628.000 Total tax Capacity -, Annual terra $451000 $33.300 Two bedroom hailb 11 18 Three bo*oan u i s 32 8 Total bedica. 118 62 Apes used 4.38 4 Density - urieracre 9.63 925 � I". WI, - $128.000 $84.000 Prroe per uril WA00 $2.270 PrNAAM i28A99 $211000 T vw" 42 37 llnh,o.aredpartdnp 76 74 Total perhhhg stab 118 III Total GtwLU* 2.81 3100 Eotlmatod poptdadon 133 59 Ranter hhoarw cap? K Eadrtnt40 rental rates $400360[ 2BWi869 -388477 WashorMW M each un1 Central PHASE 11- SENIOR APTS PHASE 11- SENIOR APTS Total units 24 28 Total bodrool 48 32 Ave dq ilKM 1A40 am Total aquae R 24AW 20.600 BuddhhBConst coal $1.100.000 1.1701000 I Toted tax C Annual tax. $25A00 $23.100 Acroo utmd 364 4 Denmty - un talion 6.23 0.5 PAco IRered sizow $64A00 Price Par unit $3,000 $3.271 TT Wag. 24 28 l.� No pttf" 6 35 Toted pawrlp stab 32 m Total cmWuMt I 2.15 Was widpw In each W In each tae /3 To' -d and oft NORMG COMMENTS i I SHELTER COMMENTS Storm www am 3 $152.00 ` 3 68.00 Pvl oaf 2 2 Strpttmtend 28 3 Tate) eves 16 18 peca v $24,148 $21A00 lard pre - w $188.000 1168.ODD OPEHSE AND CREDIT SUMMARY • PHASES 1 AND II DEVELOPER CITY DEVELOPER CRV land am $188.000 $168.000 Goan and tree panOh7 $13.000 315.000 ^pit 50150 130.00 Dov. mmplam Omm UKW.GWQ Tran ptm*vrm St $10A00 One $250 aft 4vey 20' 510.00 Otto $210 tra4 *my 20' Park dvatopn4tlt 33.00 38.00 DavtM bl Cl4ra0w . $43.000 Dro 4t and aMm sem 4aw.-p d Sra o $15.000 j $5.OD0 610.000 Da.lopw ttal0ed / SUBTOTAL $218.00 $48.000 $248.000 820.000 To' -d and oft a_ wrentl $282.00 lnd prlt» aft e Cly e>mcrtam (non $152.00 ` DIV Dart Ino. W" 68.00 Tata) kN4OD a $3.382A00 Taall atorual ors. Phan l and 1 $70.000 Cay elm d tans $11.200 PHASE 111 • POSSIBILITIES w1n14 m 5fbtvNtorrlW 64,000 (tIdwroarrratodmaike a. $288.000 1148.000 ' j 14— $w.ODD D FaL hnY Ty�''��sc 13,084.030 sw.ro0 $9.0n ca�.0oo 1 Council Agenda - 4/10/85 10. Council Update—Outlot A. Country Club Manor. There has been little change regarding this topic since the last meeting on this topic; therefore, for the sake of efficiency, you are provided a copy of the agenda supplement from the previous meeting. As you recall, this item was tabled on March 27, 1995, because David Hornig was not in attendance. Please note that he was informed by phone but not by letter that Council would be discussing the item on March 27, 1995. He told me that he regretted missing the meeting and that he would have attended had he been given a written reminder. On Monday, I sent him a note asking him to give me a written response to the terms of the sale as drafted on a preliminary basis by city staff. I asked to have his response by Wednesday this week. As of Friday, I have had no response. Therefore, I have no idea to what extent he supports the terms outlined in the attached item. 0 Council Agenda . 4110/95 Consideration of adootine terms of sale • Outlot A. Country Club Manor . (J.O.) A, REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As you recall, a few weeks ago Council directed City staff to complete negotiations with David Hornig on the sale of Oudot A, Country Club Manor. Staff met with Hornig on two separate occasions to discuss the matter. We have made progress but have not "settled" on terms at this time. However, we feel that discussions have come along far enough to justify placing this item on the agenda, hereby bringing it to a head. Council is asked to review the terms proposed below and present it to Hornig as a "take it or leave it" proposal or direct staff to negotiate further with Hornig or withdraw the land from the market. The basic terms of the staff proposal are as follows: Purchase oria. The original purchase price was $282,000. Due to the fact that it has taken almost a year since the original deal was struck and no development has occurred, it is recommended that 7.6% interest be added to the cost of the land for the time period from June of 1994 to the time that it is expected that the land will be sold. This interest expense amounts to $21,160 which could be added to the total coat creating a new purchase price of $303,160. Sign Revenue. This city currently obtains approximately $8,860 per year in sign revenue for the billboards on the site. The purchase agreement should require that the signs be allowed to remain on the portion of the site unaffected by the phased development. 7be revenue from the signs should remain with the city until the signs are taken down. Land oavment The payment of the principal amount fbr land used in development must occur at the time of development. In other words, when the first phase is developed (4 acres) the land included in this phase would be paid for at the time of development. Up until the time of development, the developer will make interest payments to the city at a rate of 74446. The interest payment would be adjusted based on the land remaining after each phase of development. Council Agenda - 4/10/95 OF B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve terms of sale concepts above. I am not sure to what extent Hornig will support the terms above. It is my understanding that he may expect to get the sign revenue as part of the deal. It is my view that his original proposal did not include reference to obtaining the sign revenue; therefore, this money should remain with the City. In our discussions, Hornig did support the concepts under item 03 above. He is willing to make interest payments to the City to retain the land. I am not sure if he is willing to pay the higher land price under item 41 above. 2. Motion to withdraw the property from the market. J There are factors at work that have developed since the original deal L�6 0 was put t could cause to rethinkselling the e h 1�, „r property athis timeether . For instance, the rate of using starts is k" �+* continues to increase which placing additional pressure on the city ix to upgrade the wastewater treatment plant. Development of an additional 74 housing units as proposed by Hornig will use additional wastewater treatment plant capacity that the City might otherwise wish it had availablo for single family housing development. One way to preserve capacity would be to wait to allow development of Outlot A until ager the upgraded wastewater treatment plant is online. Land values continue to increase in the area. During the sale delay period, a property near the site that is zoned for both multi -family and business uses sold at a price approximately twice the value per acre that Hornig offered in the original proposal. Therefore, it is likely that the City will reap a higher price for the land if it elects to wait and sell the land later. It is true that the City has holding costs associated with keeping the land. Annual holding costs are estimated at $21,160 if we assume a 74445 rate of roturn. To offset this cost is the sign revenue which amounts to $8,860 year. Council Agenda - 4!10196;.;,. Motion to modify terms of sale as outlined above based on additional • input from the developer. As noted above, the developer may not support aL of the terms ;. outlined under alternative til. Council may wish to modify the terms above based on additional input from the developer. i Is Hornig had a chance to tie up the land a year ago and elected to delay obtaining control of the land until his financing came through. During this delay, factors have come into play that could serve to nnodify the City's position with regards to the sale of the land. Therefore, it is our recommendation that the City hold on to the land at least three more years for reasons outlined under alternative i2. It would be our second choice to provide Hornig with a "take it or leave" option as outlined under alternative #1. At a minimum, the City should seek terms that provide the City with a good financial return along with control over the property ns it is developed. D. SUPPORTING DATA • None. • 130 Mo..twe. CITY OF MOF `ELLO RESIDENTIAL LOT PROJECTIONS AND ABSORPTION February 1995 I Lot Development Sewer Connections Dwvelopment I PPlet UrbanOAA 1988 1998 1997 IMI 1999 12000 2001 hnwdww Cort�at iv 99 Servic IScattered tote55 10 10 10 10 10 5 Cardinal Hills IV 32 I 25 7 Cardinal Hula V 32 10 22 Cardinal Hills VI 28 10 18 7B 42 24 12 rm plund/Vahm Plug Sinole FamOr 100 25 25 25 25 Briar Oakes Phase 18 4 4 Briar Oakes Phase II 32 8 a a 8 Oak Ridge - Existing Phase 36 36 Oak RkW - Future Phase 92 46 46 (Orin Thompson 192 64 64 I 64 Krautbeuer/River Mill Twin Homes phase 1 48 10 20 18 Twin Hames phase 11 48 20 20 8 Single Family phase 1 41 10 20 11 Single Family phase II 66 10 20 20 16 IMWst&s W Shores 48 48 1 (Eastwood Knoll 33 3 7 7 7 9 I Klein Farms, ShV9 Family - Phase I 70 35 35 Single Family - Phase 11 37 10 27 R-PUD North - Phase 1 128 10 45 45 28 R-PUD Weal - Phase 11 a 14 30 ShMn Fnm. S. of Saht. Blvd 140 10 46 46 38 T-0-16L 1 131 1 4" 1 2'88 1 232 1 292 1273 1117 I Cymytat_Iva"t 1 131 1 fi7fi 1 864 1 1086 11988 1293 1410 1628 79 11161 1 13AL—1-30JL_ NOTE: poor, na I I I n064anrb hrrap 0M The pmoftm ebb npywwwrw to aero a«ow Pw0011w• bawl an bpa baa ewrropww. Thew w w ywwrea al wu"M ere we sob obw seen Pte¢ V■Wr. rm amW also W=Vf Paw Mew rrVw ►rave naw. arr b www �JlD )RESIDINV.WK4: 04/21/95 Council Agenda - 4/24/95 14. jteview of llaup; store Anandal statement for the first auarte of DW. and copnsidgration of agpERyina securijv camera purchase and 2Mansion of walk-in cooler. (R W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This item will be covering three topica, the first being a review of the Brat quarter financial report, with the second two items covering expenditure approvals for a security camera system and an enlargement of the walk-in cooler. Liquor Store Manager Joe Hartman will be in attendance at the meeting to answer questions regarding all three items. In regard to the financial report, the liquor store operation continues to show favorable results, with the sales increasing almost $1800, or 6%, over last year's first quarter results. Also the gross profit has increased $1,000, which also amounts to s 5.8% increase over last years first quarter gross profit percentages. The resulting operating net income shows an increase of $2,800 over last year to a total of $23,783, which is approximately a 13% increase over the same period last year. The operating income is a better reflection of how the store is doing rather than the adjusted net income, which includes interest earnings and miscellaneous income items which are not a reflection on how the store is operating. Overall, the report and resulting percentages seem in line with our expectations and are ameptable for this type of operation. In addition to reviewing the financial statement, the Council is asked to consider authorizing two expenditures for the liquor store. The first one is in regard to the purchasing of a security camera system for the store that would install up to eight cameras at various locations. An eight -camera system is what is recommended if we want to provide the maximum flexibility in the system to cover the most areas, including a roof -mounted camera that can watch the service delivery area. One of the quotations received from Video Protection Services, which is the firm preferred by Mr. Hartman, would total $7,850 for an 8 -camera system, In addition, Joe would like to purchase the optional VCR lock box for an additions) $200, making the total expenditure approxims ely $8,050. Another proposal was submitted for a similar system from Floyd Security at a total cost of $7,776. To this amount I believe we would have to add the additional $200 for a locked VCR box, which makes the quotations very similar in total cost. Although they may not be identical, the proposals are using similar equipment and cameras. The cost for a camera system can be reduced by decreasing the number of camera locations we would like monitored or by providing "dummy" cameras in certain locations. A dummy camera is available at about $220 each versus $300 or so for a live camera. In addition to the camera coat, operating camerae also need additional wiring and connection cost, which increases it above the $300 amount. 16 Council Agenda - 4/2"S It appears from the quotations received that both proposals are very similar in cost when comparing a like system. If we're going to go the full route, the cost will be around $8,000, and it can be reduced to a lower cost by simply eliminating the number of positions we want covered or by installing more dummy cameras. It is the recommendation of both Joe and myself that if we are going to install a security system, we might as well put in the number of locations we feel are appropriate and cover all the areas needed As a result, it is recommended that an eight -camera system be purchased even though we could save a few thousand dollars by going to a smaller system. The second expenditure request concerns an expansion of the walk-in cooler by creating an additional S doors for display of beer products that will also allow an additional 400 cases to be placed within the walk-in cooler. As you may recall, Mr. Hartman had indicated he was having problems in keeping an adequate amount of beer in the cooler during peak periods of the summer and was interested in finding a way to expand the cooler space by either enlarging the building to the west or by some other method. The Council is asked to consider approving the remodeling of the cooler as shown in the drawing that would simply expand the cooler that exists by using up some of the space in the storage area of the back room without adding on to the building. A quotation received from Carlson Re9igeration Company estimates the cost of enlarging the cooler at $13,500 plus freight, electrical hookup, and carpentry work. As a result, the total cost is estimated at around $15,000, and more quotations may be available for presentation Monday evening. Joe is in the process of getting quotations for the carpentry work necessary to remove an interior wall and relocate a door opening to the storage area, along with any electrical work that would be needed for the cooler addition. Also, the City will be obtaining a quote from St. Cloud Refrigeration for the same work. The original cooler was enlarged a number of years ago to add additional space for keg storage, and this proposed expansion would be a similar type of addition. It seems to be the most feasible way of expanding the cooler by creating an additional five doors and provides additional space for storing beer. Boer products that are currently stored in the back room would simply be wheeled into the cooler. The proposed addition is about the only way to enlarge the cooler system without actually adding onto the building structure, which would be extremely costly compared to this option. If the Council is in agreement with the idea, Council could authorize the improvement up to a stated dollar amount based on the quotations received. B. AMRNATM ACTIONS; Review of Financial Report Council can accept the first quarter financial report as presented. Council Agenda - 4124/95 Purchase of Securitv Video Cameras Authorize the purchase of a security video system consisting of 8 cameras as proposed by Video Protection Services in the amount of $8,050, including the steel VCA box. 2. Authorize the purchase of a smaller system with the number of cameras or dummy camerae to be determined by the Council. The cost could vary between $4,100 to $5,900 depending on options selected or number of dummy cameras purchased. Do not authorize the purchase of any security system at this time. Walk-in Cooler Expansion Council could authorize the expenditure for the cooler expansion to the low quote up to a stated dollar amount. Do not authorize the expansion of the cooler at this time and continue with the present operation as is. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the opinion of Mr. Hartman and myself that a security camera system is a good idea. From a practical standpoint, if we are going to install a security system, we might as well have enough camerae to cover the entire store, including the back room, and have the camera and lenses be of such a quality that we can get dear pictures. As a result, we feel the system should contain the eight cameras as recommended, and we think the service options available from Video Protection Services would 8t our needs the best. In regard to the walk-in cooler expansion, Mr. Hartman is of the opinion that this additional cooler space is very much needed to allow us to have e cold product available to our customers on a continuous basis. Assuming that we have two quotations to choose from and the costs are around $15,000 total, it appears that this is the most feasible method of expanding the cooler and still accomplishing our needs for the future. At this time, it appears to be the easiest way of enlarging the facility at a reasonable cost. p. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of first quarter financial report; Copy of bid quotations on security video cameras; Copy of Quotations on walk-in cooler expansion. is I a MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 31Mar95 Current Assets: Cash Change Fund Investments Accounts Receivable A/R - NSF Checks Inventory Prepaid insurance TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS Fixed Assets Land & Parking Lot Buildings Furniture & Equipment less: Accumulated Depreciation L TOTAL FIXED ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS Liabilities Accounts Payable Due to EDA Fund Sales Tax Payable Salariee Payable Accrued Vacation/Sick Leave Other Accrued Expenses TOTAL LIABILITIES RETAINED EARNINGS �"'OTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE 99,891.17 1,600.00 438,650.24 (476.82) 171,705.08 7,149.22 718,518.89 46,591.03 199,285.65 74,324.45 (214,100.54) ------------ 106,100.59 824,619.48 000000000000 1,200.67 25,000.00 10,322.60 4,297.62 16,672.02 860.69 ------------ 58,353.60 766,265.80 ------------ 824,619.48 00=00=800800 9 a Liquor Sales Discounts Cost of sales GROSS PROFIT - LIQUOR Beer sales Cost of sales GROSS PROFIT - BEER Mine Sales Cost of Sales GROSS PROFIT - MINE lsc sales Cost of Sales GROSS PROFIT - MISC TAXABLE MisC Non-taxable Sales Cost of Sales GROSS PROFIT - MISC NON -TA) TOTAL SALES TOTAL COST OF SALES TOTAL FREIGHT COST TOTAL GROSS PROFIT MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR GROSS PROFIT BY PRODUCT COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR ENDING DEC 31, 1994 AND 1995 1994 YEAR-TO-DATE AMOUNT 87,296 65,085 22,211 25.4% 170,584 135,989 34,595 20.31 33,043 20,405 12,638 38.2% 6,891 5,236 1,655 24.0% 304 315 IA ------(30) 3.2% 298,119 227,030 1,636 69,453 23.32 0000.0.000 1995 YEAR-TO-DATE AMOUNT 93,621 69,819 23,802 25.4% 181,501 141,923 39,579 21.8% 33,584 23,972 9,612 28.6% 6,692 4,951 ____;,741 26.0% 684 473 210 30.7% 316,083 241,138 1,463 73,482 23.2% ..00000000 C MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR REVENUE AND EXPENSES COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR ENDING DEC 31, 1994 AND 1995 1994 1995 YEAR-TO-DATE YEAR-TO-DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT SALES Liquor 87,296 93,621 Beer 170,584 181,501 Mine 33,043 33,584 Other Merchandise 6,891 6,692 Misc Non -Taxable Sales 304 684 Discounts TOTAL SALES 298,119 316,083 COST OF GOODS SOLD (228,666) ---------- (242,601) ---------- GROSS PROFIT 69,453 23.3% e.aaaaaaca 73,482 23.2% aaoaaane» 'SNERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE t Personal Services Salaries 26,897 27,720 PERA 1,161 1,212 FICA 2,052 2,105 Insurance 2,202 2,626 unemployment Benefits TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 32,313 10.8% 33,662 10.6% Supplies Office Supplies 72 555 General Operating Supplie 1,313 1,327 Other Supplies 60 17 TOTAL SUPPLIES 1,445 .5% 1,899 .6% C MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR REVENUE AND EXPENSES COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR ENDING DEC 31, 1994 AND 1995 1994 1995 YEAR-TO-DATE YEAR-TO-DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT Other Services 6 Charges Professional Services Maintenance Agreements Communication 277 721 Travel -Conference -Schools Advertising 1,422 883 Insurance 4,555 3,693 Utilities, Electric 2,351 2,352 Utilities, Heating 868 595 Utilities, Sewer 6 Water 319 23 Maintenance, Equipment 47 832 Maintenance, Building 660 607 Maintenance, other Depreciation --Acquired As 4,007 3,681 Other Misc Expenses 203 ---------- 552 ---------- TOTAL OTHER SERVICES 6 CH 14,709 4.91 14,138 4.51 TOTAL GENERAL 6 ADMIN EXPENS 48,468 ---------- 16.31 49,699 ---------- 15.71 TOTAL OPERATING INCOME 20,905 oo0nn0nnan 7.01 23,783 anneneaeo0 7,51 Other Income (Expense) Interest Income 1,904 4,095 Cash Long/Short 70 (81) Sale of Property ---------- ---------- TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) 1,974 .71 4,014 1.31 NET INCOME (EXPENSE) 22,959 0000000000 7.71 27,798 0000000000 8.81 Tranafers In/Out ADJUSTED NET INCOME (EXPENSE 22,959 7.71 27,798 8.81 p I 0000000000 0000000000 VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICE 612 472 3193 P.01 0 z gypout, CCTV Systeme: VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICES Design 4379 WILSHIRE BLVD. .C206 Service MOUND, MN 55364-1945 Renta] ( 612) 472-3195 (612) 538-6600 DM2/Q9/95 1/3 T0: Hi -Way Liquors Term+ down net compl Hwy 25 S. Delivery on request Monticello, MN 55362 Attn: Joe Hartman 295-5222 Fax 295-8891 wo are PIMM to cote as tollm: OuaMtty Deseriptton UnitPrtte A=unt 7 TC952 Burle CCD Cameras @ 229.00 S 1603 .00 1 TC952 Burle CCD Camera w/Auto Iris Car 289.00 5 TC9704 4mm Man. Iris Lens @ 79.00 395 .00 2 TC9708 8mm Man. Iris Lenses @ 69.00 138 .00 ' 1 TC9702 2.6mm Man. Iris Lens 139 .00 8 TC1334 'Transformers 24 volt @ 18.00 144 .00 7 TV10A Camera Mounts @ 32.00 224.00 1 TC9383 Burle Outdoor HsS. w/ Heater 225 .GO 1 TC9211 Housing Mount 65 .00 \ 1 AD912 AD 12" Monitor 219 .00 1 TC1909 Burle 9" Monitor 169 .00 1 TC8141 4 Postion Switoher 159 .00 1 TC3910 Burle 24 Hr. Time Lapse VCR 949 .00 1 MV16 Robot Multiplexer 1795 .00 RC59U 9001 Coax Cable 171.00 32 305 BNC Connecters @ 2.75 P8 .00 Power Cable, Mtg. Hdwr. 49 .00 i TOTAL EGUIPMEMT: S 6821 .00 Ins""Ition: 13.0 LABOR: 443 .37 OPTIONS: SUBTOTAL: 17" Monitor $170.00 Additiona TAX: f 585 .00 Steal VCR Lock Box 189.00 Additions. CITY TAX: Lourou Audio Syotem 269.00 Additiona PRICING FIRM FOR 30 DAYS FROM 02/09/95 TOTAL. t 7844.7)' P1tCte Dt116W"MWJFAtflMI WMAW. � I SUBMITTED BY: Steven T. Sohlachter /�F VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICE 612 472 3199 P.02 TC952 Series Low Cost CCD Cameras • 1134noh Format CCD Imager ■ Standard Resolution ■ Excellent Sensitivity e Compact Rugged Design e Automatic SuperShutterTu ■ Eliminates Autoaria Lenses The TC952 Series are standard resolution, 1/9anch Image format CCD cameras, designed for video surveillance systems. Contemporary stytumg and canoeebd controls allow these compact cameras to bland naturally Into the most modem InetaOation sites. The TC992 Serbs kooduoes an electronic SuperShuCetTM with a speed of 1/100,000 second - a ten -told Improvement in shutter pwfamanoe compared to previous designs. This unique shutter circultry allows for a smooth, 0near response to changes In illumination over Its entire range of operation. The wide dynamic range provided by the automatic shutter circuits eliminates the need for an auto -Iris Ions. Incorporating the latest In CCD technology, these cameras provide detailed video without tag, image retention, or geometric distortion. These foaturas, combined with low power consumption, impraseive sensitivity and a wide environmental operating range, make the TC952 Sens Cameras an excellent choice for low cost surveillance system applications. Specifications Electrical Model R"d Voftp Nomimt ammo No. Volula Rane1 Powe TC0521i 25 VAC, eo Nt 20 to 50 . w &A Ra170 7052xP 21 VAC, 00 w 20 to 30 . w cclR Al nad von.0. ....�.r..,.O �� M p 10010,.E,. R-.4pd a.pvaa lIm" supplies I. T01S22: Yl0 VAC, e01ft egyyN VAC, eo M3044" I T tix-2d: 220.250 VAC. rd180 N: input VAC, 508014 Cumin daager: Interline Tnusfer CCD — 1/b4nch Image format Active Picture Elements: TC952: 510 H x 492 V. TC952): 500 H x 582 V. Typical Spectral Response of Imager 90 eo , M 701 w / , eo to I :o I ` to l 5 3 3.4vo coo coo ;5 moo Ileo +coo Hortwntel Resolution: TC952: 383 TVI. TC952%: 375 TVA, VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICE 612 472 3193 P.04 ,.-- Your Single Source For CCTV Equipment Features: • 12" B/VV High Performance CRT • Over 800 TV Unes Resolution • Excellent for "Multi -Screen" Displays • High Brightness and Contrast • Video Loop Through • Switchable Terminallon • Rack Mountable • Front Panel Control Cover • UL Listed, CSA Certified, FCC Compliant A Description: The AD912 is a it high performance blackhvhlte monitor, The AD912 dlaplays over 800 lines of resolution on a bright 12- picture Nbe. This Combination provides excellem multi•ecreen display& commonly produced by "Picture In Picture" end "Cued Multiplexers". An user oontrols are conveniently located behind a protecwe front panel door. The AD912 can be placed on a desk or mounted In a standard 19" rack ising the A0912RK rack mount Wt. f. VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICE 612 472 3195 P.03 TC3910 Series . Video Cassette Recorders to Event -Alarm and 24 -Hour Time -apse Recording ■ Video and Audio Recording ■ "Alarm On" Output at OnScreenlOn-Tape Recording Data a High Speed Video Scan a Color Compatible The TC3910 Sayles Video Cassette Recordere offer time-lapse in 12 and 24 hour selectable speeds and a unique event alarm recording capab0lty for a varlet' of CCN applications. This reliable VCR records video and sound on command, producing HR-VHSTM pictures with a horizontal resolution of 350 lines black and white and 240 Imes color. Designed for security, the TC3910 Series features unique event alarm recording. When connected to an olorm switch and programmed for a pre-soleeted retarding duration, the TC3910 Serbs automatically starts recording when an alarm is received. A light on the front panel indicates that an alarm has been artivated. Upon alarm activation, it can also accept video input from e second camera. In the event alarm mode, the unique spinning head design permits alarm recordings without delay; recording stare Immedietey, because the rotary tread is ready at the recording speed. Atter each alarm recording time span, the unit automaticatly goes into the READY mode and awalts the next alarm. During the READY mode, the tape moves Just enough at timed intervals to prevent damage from the spinning heads to either tape or recorder. Other important security features of the TC3910 Series Include a Program Timer, which pre-programs the time of day in which the unit records alarm activity (automatically turns ordoff anytime in a 24-hour period) and a security lock for the recorder& controls. A buIX-in timeldate generator records time, date, and alarm Indication both on -=raw and on -tape. The TC3910 Sefies features on- screen display (0SD) of head usage, arta slaw -speed tracking. High -Speed Video Scan avows for fast searching for areas of interest. For reliable and economical CCN recording, the TC3910 Sayles provides the system capability, quality, and ease of operation needed for continuous, dependable service. Specifications Electrical Power. root NO. Rt1l4e Vonaee voruge RKW PC TC3910 120 VAC. 60 fir 108 to 132 to W TC391OX 230 VAC. 50 Ha 207 to 253 1& W TC391 OXdM 240 VAC, 00 M 216 to 261 21 W Tape Cassette: Standard 12.1 mm (1/2 in) VHS tape. TC3910: NTSC (T-120). TC3910X, TC391OX-UK: PAL (E-160). Video Recording System: Rotary Heads: 4 helical acorn (2 selected for recording). Luminance: FM recording. Color: Converted subcaMer, direct recording. Selectable Speods (Recording 3 Playback); TC3910: 2, 12, and 24 hours. TC3910X, TC3910X-UK: 3,12, and 24 hours. o FLOYD Total Security February 9, 1995 6U orid A` 9fW SOLO awaMgten, mtod"0 s 664an (617) 6614626 • PAR (612) SM4641 Hi -Way Liquors 515 Pine Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Attention: Mr. Joe Hamman Subject: Closed Circuit Camera System Dear Mr. Hartman: The Floyd Total Security Company is pleased to submit this price proposal in support of the subject program. Our proposal presents a customer service driven approach to meeting the Hi -Way Liquors security objectives. Our view of the system requirements is that professional and timely installation and service are necessary to meet customer satisfaction. Floyd Total Security would design and install the camera system based on our experience and capabilities in: •45 Years in the Security Industry *Service technicians on duty 24 hour: a day (The Twin Cities Largest Fleet) *Prompt, reliable, professional installation and service *Full Service Security: CCTV, Alarms, Card Access. Locks & Safes, Hannon Pre- employment. Investigations. Security Officers and Patrol Service *Security expert with thousands of business installations The tasks to be performed am in accordance with the attached statement -of -work. The cost document details the proposed price. This quote is valid for 30 days. Terms and conditions shall be mutually agreed upon. If you have any questions resultant to contract arangements or any elements of our proposal, please call me at 887-1131. Sincerely, FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY AwAZ.4' Gregory R. Weide Security Consultant AwddM W Ano CMnrn: W AIMra SYMM • C! Md CW" TebvW M 8V8WM • end Ace CMtrol OYMM /� V lA. 6btdd CMbd Mon6aMip ({IAa0/1 Anoka • P�p�AdMd L*CkW"W d • P &MW ll0 6rxu=T Lacb MAR. -01' 95 1D11)) I5:58 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY TEL:612 881 6524 P. 001 Total Security FAX COVER SKEET � vet x,20 (612) 6814an FAX (612) 6814824 Date: 3-1-95 T0: Joe Hartman From: crew wei9e Company: HT -WAY L.T-1- Department: Phone: (612) Fax: 295-8891 FAX: (612) 881-6524 (Include area code) • To confirm: (612) 881-5625 Number of pages 2 plus Cover Sheet 1 TOTALSENT 3 Message: Enclosed are 2 plana for scaled down CCTV systems. This will not give complete coverage, but will serve as an effective dnterran* _ Additional "dummy" camerae aro available at 220.00 each - RplNnW end C4m4wraW1 ALM Shams • CI*W CIMAI TOW4W Systole Card Amm CaftW BV8W • UL Uaad Con&W Yanamdis 5WM Sgvleaa �R MAR. -01' 9SIWEDI 15:58 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY TEL:612 881 6524 P. 002 STATEMENT OF WORK AND COST DOCUMENT KI -WAY LIQUORS CAMERA SYSTB.VI ft Dmaudm 4 Burle cameras with I= and mount 1 17" monitor 1 24 hourtaorder I Four position switcher FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY INSTALLED PURCHASE SYSTEM: Insullation 54.104.00 MAR. -0V 95IWEDI 15:59 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY TEL:612 881 6524 P.003 4 STATEMENT OF WORK AND COST DOCUMENT HI -WAY LIQUORS CAMERA SYSTEM (by 4n 4 Rude cameras with lens and mount 1 17' monitor I Rabat MV16 multiplexer 1 24 hour =order FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY INSTALLED PURCHASE SYSTEM: wtanation SSS37.00 C/S3 STATEMENT OF WORK AND COST DOCUMENT HI -WAY LIQUORS CAMERA SYSTEM ft Demdodo 7 Burle cameras with lens and mount 1 Burle camera with auto itis lens I Outdoor housing with he=r and blower I Outdoor mount I 17" monitor I Robot MV 16 multiplexer l 24 hour recorder 1 9" monitor 1 Four position switcher FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY UNSTALLED PURCHASE SYSTEM: Installation $7,776.00 CIS:A�l FFJL-07-9� TUE 01:44 AM P•02 ENTRY YSTEMS - NC.aoasm 2182 4TH STREET. WHrfE BEAR LAKE. MN 55110 (OW 428407 t81. oafs Proposal for 44 1 -W�-1 QuuAS Name 'SoE AA -0--r— Ao-J Address WI SSC. VmoCrlc. 6t.c.e14"rj, 71p SS 36�. Pnone �qS - Saz� Date 2-6'9S �A�t acs -8911 GUArt eon 8 B44a4f_ 5s Y3" 1' V}t? 0 09-.4f�cA's S MOHn/�S Mows coa n. Els 7 BuaI.E AA -TO 1 wu s i-GWSES I 134AAL-C to rl. « Awm i w, r L-4EW V I Quat.E 17" wteu -IITW I B(Ar-L-E 34ito T, t.. pmrdameA I I(p QAS51'T'ICN MkLTlpt_EXER OlA7BODR I�tuStn! W! i -1%4T82 ILI'f MiM��sp�ysr )9 00 N / ./ J C fool 124 Mr. Monitarine PrrAncom t1ap01701, month) Ito"0" OUNP11" Accepted by the purchaar thle day of tbelmty conwhanl K I S P AN F -4 d% -- Ow tp c �J CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO. DISPLAY FIXTURES COMPANY No. 6078 443 HOOVER STREET N.E. • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55413 •6121379.78M Page 2 of 2 + Manufrcturm of Fires Cuatom GyWrst Work, Ardrincturel Modnont and Ston Flrrlur t O Certton Refrigeration Co., Inc. O Digby Fixture Co. QUOTATION T„• Hi -May Liquors Attn, Joe Hartman Date; 4-19-95 Addrer. . Prole-�- Walk In Cooler Addition Loudon: Type of Wort Refrigeration System, (1) New Indoor 1 1/2 HP Compressor Unit, B22 Freon, 208/230 Volt, Single Phase Power with Hatching Evaporator Coil, 115 Volt Single Phase Power with e 5 Year Compressor Warranty. The Existing Refrigeration System was Sired for an Approximate B.T.U. Load of 68,500 with 19 Glass Display Doors. With the Exleting Reg Addition, Approximately 6,650 B.T.U.'a Were Added and Temperature was Not Greatly Affected. With the New Addition and (5) Display Doors, an Additional Load of 16,950 B.T.U.'s is Now Added to the Existing System. The Most Important Reason for Adding Refrigeration In Air Movement Over Product, the Closest Evaporator Coil is Approximately 18' Away. The New Cooler Addition Without Air Movement will Run Wermer and will have a Longer Run Time. New Installed Pricer 8 3,655.00 Note, This Price Does Not Include Electrical Hook Ups, Sales Tex or freight Charges on New Equipment. Prepared by a 19 Willies Ju s Accepted by ls'P OWNER'S COPY CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO. DISPLAY FIXTURES COMPANY No. 6078 4-" 40OVER STREET N.E. a MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55413 a 8121371}7868 Page 1 of 2 Manu4tturers of Fine Custom Cabinet Work, Architectural Woodwork and Store Fixtuna O Carlson Refrimation Co., Inc. OOisplav Fixture Co. QUOTATION TO, Hi-Wav Liauora Attns Joe Hartman Data* a -to -os Address: Hwy 25 V. Idonttcelle, Mw SR_i6s Project: Walk In Cooler Addition Location* Tvps of Work We are pleased to Quote the followings (1) Walk In Cooler Addition to Existing walk In as per Drawing to Include the Followings Removal of Existing Wall Panels of Cooler All Metal Fabrication work to New 6 Existing Wall/Ceiling Panels. Installation of New Panels with Net Opening to Front for (5) New Anthony 28 3/4' It 73" Glass Display Doors to Best Match Existing Door Line Up. Notes Existing Sheet Rack Wall to be Re- worked Including Entrance Door, Relocated by Owner for New Net Opening of Cooler Addition. (S) New Anthony 28 3/4" If 73' Display Doors, Cold Finish with Vertical Lighting and Three Doors to be with Flat Shelves, (5) Per Door. Notes Electrical Hook Ups by Owner. (5) New Doors of B -O -F Gravity Flow Shelving, 6' & 5' Depth with Two Doors of Six Tier Layout and Three Doors of Five Tier, Due to a New Ceiling Height of 88' Outside. Shelf Layout of Two Tier 6 Pack, Two Tier 12 Pack Narrow and Two Case/24 Pack, Single Case on Five Tier Layout. Delivered and Installed Prices 8 81995.00 Notes Above Price Does Not Include Sales Tax, Freight on Now Class Doors, B -O -F Racking or Cooler Panels. Electrical Hook ups, or Any General Construction Work as Noted by Owner. /�f`i WW CooLat wyk4 ew RELOCATED 5r -f NEW cot_ I*Fw �mm tai rp,i MT. C* Z - F*VA RBAOV2 E�TN6 BALL'S T�l TI -- W-f I `REMo J OSE �4W 'SECTION WALL %.E.VM WALK-IN DOSTM FUOV 9F13-VN6 lw-e. GOOL-D� PLAN NOT TO 'SCALE Y p 40 HOOM 9t KE. IO WIS GRAVITY SELF-FEEDING FLOW RACK SYSTEMS 0 m --v- -e �Y FD(TUaEB CQ 443 HDOfM S�RISg419 812379.7868 D APR - 2 4- 9 3 MON 14 : 1 9 Sr . CLOUD R E P R I G. P. 0 2 604 LINCOLN AVENUE NORTHEAST ST. CLOUD, MINNESOTA 68304 TELEPHONE: (612) 261.6861 FAX: (612) 261.9390 5004 April 24, 1995 Hi -Way Liquors Highway 25 S Monticello, MN 55362 Attention: Joe Regarding: Quotation on Walk-in Cooler Expansion PRICE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: 1. New ceiling for expanded cooler area. 2. Five (5) Anthony glass display doors to match existing line-up. 3. Five (5) doors of B -OF gravity flow shelving for new Anthony doors. 4. One (1) 2 HP indoor Krack condensing unit with matching evaporator (R-22 refrigerant, 2081230 volt, single phase). 5. All refrigeration aocessorles as required (ie: expansion valve, thermostat, solenoid valve, etc.). 6. Copper piping, copper finings and armanex. 7. Necessary amounts of R-22 refrigerant. B. labor to do changes on cooler construction and refrigeration work. 9. Sales tax. 10. Freight to job site. TOTAL BOX PRICE: $15,470.00 NOTE 1: Walls above and alongside cooler to be removed by others. NOTE 2: The total price does not include any etoctrical or general construction work. Thank you for the opportunity to Quote you on this project. If you have any questions or require further information, please conWt me. Sincerely, 17 ST. C D RE ERATION, QVC. a Andy Hanson AH/jah Council Agenda - 4/24!95 es. Consideration of establisbing a marketing strategy for the Eastwood Knoll subdivisimA. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the previous meeting of the City Council, the City Council discussed the potential of selling the entire development to the Orrin Thompson Development Company or to Vic Hellman. During the discussion, the possibility of completing a land exchange with Tony Emmerich for a potential sludge site was also discussed. There was also the prospect that Emmerich might wish to present an offer for the purchase of Eastwood Knoll without a land swap. At the end of the discussion, it was concluded that City staff would prepare additional information regarding alternatives and also obtain proposals from various realtors to market and sell the lots one by one. Following is a summary of the events that have occurred since the Council meeting along with a review of the proposals that City staff has obtained. ORRIN THOMP80N Attached is information from Orrin Thompson regarding their proposal for purchase of the property. The proposal submitted by Orrin Thompson is positive in that it provides the City with a reputable developer to complete the site development in a fashion that probably meets the goals and expectations of the community with regard to development of step-up housing. The project will also release City staff from spending additional time in the development process. From a monetary standpoint, revenue Brom the site generated from the sale of lots to Orrin Thompson Homes win amount to $629,000. City expenses to date, along with additional project expenses at the request of Orrin Thompson Homes, will amount to an estimated $716,000, thus leaving us $87,000 short of the $238,000 land value we had hoped to recover from this project. If Council selects this option, it should be aware that Orrin Thompson can abandon this site if sales do not progress as desired. The equity that Orrin Thompson has under this proposal is only $60,000, thus the possibility exists that Orrin Thompson could abandon the site if the project does not develop as hoped, which could possibly leave the City with the more undesirable lots. Please see the additional information from Orrin Thompson Homes regarding the specifics of the Orrin Thompson proposal. VIC HELLMAN It is my understanding that Vic Hellman has withdrawn his proposal to purchase the development. Council Agenda - 4/24/96 SOUTH EM[MERRICH/EASTWOOD KNOLL LAND EXCHANGE City staff has done additional research regarding the possibility of exchanging Eastwood Knoll for the 220 -acre agricultural site south of Kjellbergs Mobile Home Park now owned by Tony Emmerich. At first blush, this idea looked quite desirable, as the City could solve its problem with regard to finding a sludge deposit site and at the same time be released from the work of selling and developing the Eastwood Knoll subdivision. Subsequent to the meeting, Kelsie McGuire and John Simola did extensive research as to the viability of the Emmerich property as a sludge deposit site. It was found that of the 220 acres available, only 60.80 acres are actually usable as a sludge deposit site. In teras of providing a long-term solution to our sludge disposal problems, the site did not appear to meet the need; therefore, no further efforts are now underway to pursue this exchange any further. Please note that Tony Emmerich did make an offer for the exchange. His offer included $24,000 per lot for the 33 lots at Eastwood Knoll in exchange for 220 acres on an even -up basis. Under this proposal, the value of the Emmerich property was set at $3,600 per acre. EM1YlEERICH PROPOSAL FOR OUTRIGHT PURCHASE OF EASTWOOD KNOLL. Assuming that the feasibility of a land exchange did not materialize, Tony Emmerich did make an offer for the outright purchaso of the entire Eastwood Knoll plat as proposed with a 33 -lot configuration. While the proposed outright purchase would still require the City to have some interest in the property by carrying a purchase money mortgage (similar to a contract for deed) on the land, there are features of the proposal that provide additional guarantees to the City that the developer would not easily walk away from the project.. While all of the details have not been finalized in a written document, the following is our understanding of the proposal as discussed Friday afternoon. The proposal would call for a purchase price of $20,600 for each of the 33 lots for a total value of $676,600. The current grading plan indicates there may be between two and five of the lots that will require additional grading to avoid tuck -under lots, which would requiro us to reduce the prion of these lots by $1,600 each. Estimating four lots that need additional grading would bring the total purchase prion offered to approximately $670,600. Mr. Emmerich would agree to provide a letter of credit equal to 26% of the improvement cost, or approximately $104,000, as a guarantee. 20 Council Agenda - 4/24/96 • The project cost estimated at $416,000 would be assessed to the individual lots on an equal basis with interest from date of assessment. ' Although the number has not been established, Mr. Emmerich would agree to purchasing a minimum number of lots each year such as five to seven lots. If the agreed-upon number was not paid, Mr. Emmerich would be in default. • The agreement would call for a two-year time fra= where the price per lot would remain at $20,600, after which time an adjustment could be negotiated. ' The $20,600 cash down payment would be credited to the last lot purchased in the development. • The purchase would be financed by a purchase money mortgage, which is similar to a contract for deed, and would basically cover the land value only estimated at $233,600, with the balance of the offer being assessed as special assessments. To summarize, the proposed offer should generate a total of approximately $670,600 for the development. There is a $20,600 down payment and a letter of credit estimated at $104,000 as guarantees. The City would be receiving interest on approximately $437,000 of the sale price, as this is the estimated amount of the assessments for the improvements and the Meadow Oak storm sewer pond outlet assessment that would apply to this property. As a comparison, it is estimated that if we value the original property at $164,600 and establish a value of $18,600 for each of the four lots we need to incorporate into this plat, our original investment in the property would be $238,600. The offer proposed would generate approximately $206,000 in addition to covering the improvement costs which are assessed, which is one of the better offers we have received to date. While this proposal would not be a 100% guarantee, the fact that we did have a down payment and a letter of credit for 26% of the improvement costs does give us more security than other purchase proposals we have received. Certainly the advantage to this type of an offer would be that the City would be hopefWly done with this project as far as marketing is concerned. Ono additional item that has to be negotiated concerning this proposal would be what type of restrictive covenants would apply to this plat. Mr. Emmerich is not opposed to reasonable covenants and minimum values for this project but would be hesitant on establishing a value of $160,000 for each of the lots, as he feels there are some areas that will not sustain that value. Mr. Emmerich feels that there are areae near the entrance and also Council Agenda - 4124/95 on lots that are exposed toward the freeway that may not be suitable for $150,000 homes, and he would be reluctant to commit to that amount for all the lots. Acceptance of this offer by the City Council would require a determination of the final values we would accept and to further negotiations on the final terms of this proposal. REVIEW OF REAL ESTAIM AGENT PROPOSAIS TO MARKET EASTWOOD KNOLL PROPERTY City staff submitted lettere to all real estate agents in Monticello for proposals. Attached is a summary of the proposals as well as letters from each proposer. The City received proposals from four real estate companies, including Art Dorn from Century 21, Dan Frie from Wright Sherburne Realty, Dale Florek from Edina Realty, and Jim Herbst from Edina Realty. The proposals all appear to provide similar services with regard to market analysis and pricing assistance. In terms of marketing programs, it appears on paper that the Edina Realty proposal prepared by Dale Florek is very thorough and comprehensive. The remaining three appear to meet the minimum requirements for marketing. Florek's proposal included advertising in the Minneapolis paper as well as providing other marketing support offered by Edina Realty. Although Herbst did not mention the services in his letter that Edina Realty provides, it is assumed that he could obtain those same services through his office. In terms of assisting the City with the actual sales transaction and the paperwork involved, it appears that all four companies provide the same services. There is some variation in terms of payment of commission. Under the Century 21 and the Edina Realty proposals, both propose a Qat 10% commission on each sale whether or not one agent or two agents are involved in the transaction. Under the Edina Realty proposal submitted by Florek, if two agents are involved, the commission is 10%; if Florek is the only agent involved, the commission is 6%. Under the Wright Sherburne proposal, if a single agent is involved, the commission is 5%; if two agents are involved, the commission is 7%. In summary, it appears that the Wright Sherburne real estate company is providing the best offer in teams of coat of services. The term of contract proposed by Century 21 and Wright Sherburne is one year. The proposals submitted by Florek and Herbst did not indicate a contract term. In summary, it appears that the proposals submitted by the various firms are very similar. It could be argued that the Century 21 and Edina Realty proposals could possibly result in generation of more prospective buyers duo to the reach that Century 21 and Edina Realty might have into the metro 22 Council Agenda - 4/24195 market. In terms of price, however, it is clear that the Wright Sherburne Realty offices are offering the best deal to the City. Assuming that Wright Sherburne can move the property at a rate equal to the other firms, it is obvious that this firm should be selected based on price; however, if Council is not convinced that Wright Sherburne is able to move the property as quickly as the other firms, one of the other three should then be considered. Based on the merits of the request for proposals, it appears that the Edina Realty proposal submitted by Florek is the next best alternative. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to move forward on the Eastwood Knoll project by selling the property to Orrin Thompson Homes as outlined in the latest proposal submitted by Bruce Pankinen of Orrin Thompson Homes. Motion to continue to investigate the possibility of a land exchange with Tony Emmerich. This does not appear to be a feasible option because the sludge application area is relatively small and does not serve our city's long- term needs. It will take a considerable amount of money to make the site ready for sludge application (two years). If the development pace continues as in the past two years, this area will likely be ready for urbanization only four years after it has been prepared as a sludge application site, at which time the City would then need to be looking for another sits in the tuwnship. Perhaps in the long run, it is most efficient for the City to find the best site for sludge application today. Motion to move forward on the proposal by Emmerich to purchase the entire plat by agreeing to work out the final details. Under this alternative, the City Council would find the offer attractive enough to allow the City to get out of the development business with a reasonable level of guarantee that the developer would not walk away fiom the project midstream. The proposed offer still leaves the City a little short in covering what we had originally hoped to obtain (!6164,600 for the raw land and !$18,600 for each of the four lots incorporated into the plat). In reality, perhaps $206,000 for what we had hoped would be $238,000 isn't such a bad deal. Motion to direct City staff to enter a contract with a real estate firm for the purpose of marketing the Eastwood Knoll property. Under this alternative, the City Council should select one of the four proposers noted in the discussion above. Once the real estate firm is 23 Council Agenda - 4/24/95 selected, we will consult with them regarding the final content of the restrictive covenants and bring them to the City Council for final approval at an upcoming meeting. Motion to direct City staff to market the property directly without the assistance of a real estate firm. Under this alternative, City staff would prepare information on the site and submit it to various real estate firms and builders throughout the local and metro area. The ad would be placed in the MontiSello Times and in the Minneapolis newspapers. City staff would then have to respond to each and every call regarding the land and set up meetings with prospective buyers. It would have to negotiate pricing and would have to complete transaction detail on all lots sold. Under this alternative, the City would save approximately $1,300 to $1,800 in commission fees for each lot; however, we would have significant City staff time invested in the sales process. Therefore, it would be a false savings. Given the work load associated with ten major improvement projects this summer, along with updating of the comprehensive plan, it is not realistic to believe that the City will be able to do as good and thorough a job of marketing and selling the lots that one might hope. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In terms of the Orrin Thompson development proposal, the proposal has some merit and could represent an opportunity for the City to take advantage of the marketing power and positive approaches to development that Orrin Thompson is known for, however, the proposal does not make any guarantees that the City will not get a portion of the property back; therefore, this proposal has a major flaw. City staff recommends either outright sale to Emmerich or sale of lots on an individual basis via a local real estate firm. It is somewhat difficult to determine which of the two recommended alternatives above are best. Your choice depends on how fast you think the property will sell and at what price. Simply put. If you believe that lots sold through the real estate agent will sell at an average price of $23,250 or greater, and the majority will sell within 8 months, then it is best to sell lots one by one via a real estate agent. 24 Council Agenda - 4124/95 If, on the other hand, you believe that on average, the lots will sell at a price lower than $23,000 per lot, and it will take over 6 months to sell all of the lots, including the "dog" lots facing the fi-eeway, then selling all the lots to Emmerich is your best bet. As a final note, values in the Oak Ridge subdivision reveal an average lot cost for an average lot of about $23,000, and this subdivision sold out in about 1 112 years. If Council wishes to sell lots on an individual basis, it is our recommendation to select Wright Sherburne Realty. This is based on the favorable terms for payment of commissions. In addition, Wright Sherburne Realty is well known in this area and will likely do a good job in marketing the property to potential local builders in the area that could take advantage of the availability of the lots in Eastwood Knoll. The only possible amendment to the proposal that the Council may wish to negotiate is the term of the contract. Perhaps Council would like to request that the length of the contract be reduced to just this construction season, which would enable us to evaluate the performance of the company and perhaps change real estate Rrms if things do not go well. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Orrin Thompson proposal and supporting letters; Summary of Emmerich pose proposal; Real estate firm RFP summary; Copy of each proposal submitted by various real estate firma. 25 ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES Minnesota Calls Us Home April 13, 1995 Mr. Jeff O'Neill Assistant City Administrator 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362-9245 Re: Eastwood Knoll Fiscal Impact Dear Jeff: In response to our recent telephone conversation, Orrin Thompson Homes has prepared the following Fiscal Impact Analysis of const- ructing single family detached homes on the Eastwood Knoll pro- erty. The physical constraints of the land, coupled with local political decisions dictated the holding capacity of the land to be 38 single family dwelling units. According to the National Association of Home Builders, const- ruction of 38 new single family detached homes will generate: a. 66.9 worker -years of employment in construction and related industries. b. $1,736,600 in wages. c. $714,400 in combined local, state and federal tax revenues. Construction activity creates indirect or secondary ("ripple") effects in the larger economy as the wages earned by those directly affected by new construction are spent. This also generates additional tax revenues. Moreover, now home buyers are likely to spend more on purchase of products and services associated with owning a home, ouch as furniture and appliancoo. As new homes are occupied, a third "ripple" is sot up. Tho new rosidento also spend a portion of their earnings in local business, which results in staff and operational expansion. Expansion of existing business, and the influx of now ones, increa000 tho demand for construction, thereby, continuing the "ripple." 8421 Wayzata 8hd. • Suite 300 • Golden Valley, MN 55428.5".7333 /�� At Eastward Knoll we intend to build -out the neighborhood in eighteen months. The average base price value of the new homes will range from $110,000 to $160,000. These homes will be similar our Westbranch Crossings and Saddlebrook neighborhoods in Plymouth, MN. The average family income of the new residents is estimated to be $55,000. These new residents, as outlined above, will spend millinns of dollars annually in the local And the larger economy. If we construct 38 new homes, with an average value of $135,000, the land will generate $85,042.48 in total real estate taxes per year (assuming a current tax capacity rate of 113.028). This new tax amount would be shared as follows: Monticello School District (TCR 61.499) $46,271.84 Wright County (TCR 30.651) 23,061.82 City of Monticello (TCR 18.308) 13,775.00 Monticello Hospital (TCR 2.570) 1,933.82 Total 113.028 $85,042.48 The key to the success of the Eastwood Knoll project is to find a builder, like Orrin Thompson Homes, with the expertise and metropolitan exposure to build -out the development in the shortest possible time period. I trust this information will be beneficial to the city council. Respectfully Bruce Pankonin Development Manager ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES 156 Minnesota Calls Us Home April 6, 1995 Mr. Jeff O'Neill Assistant City Administrator City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362-9245 Re: Eastwood Knoll Ref: City Project 94-02C Dear Mr. O'Neill: The purpose of this letter is two -fold. First, I want to high- light Orrin Thompson Home's overall interest in the Monticello area; and secondly, to outline the general terms of a potential purchase of the proposed Eastwood Knoll Subdivision from the City of Monticello. In October, 1994, Orrin Thompson Homes purchased 78.52 acres of land from Ralph and Naomi Hermes. This land is presently located in Monticello Township and lies on the south side of County Road 118, directly across the roadway from the City of Monticello's new Oak Ridge neighborhood. It is our intention to bring the Hermes property into the City of Monticello; to subdivide the land into single-family detached urban lots; and to construct new homes in the base price range of $110,000 to $160,000. As you know, these homes will be similar to the new homes in our Weetbranch Crossings and Saddlebrook neighborhoods located in Plymouth, Minnesota. To facilitate the development of the Hermes property, Orrin Thompson Homes contributed $8,000, to the City of Monticello, for partial funding of a sanitary sewer capacity study. In November, 1994, the City of Monticello retainod OSM, consulting civil engineer'o, to prepare, among other things, "altornativoo for service to the Orrin Thompson... parcel currently located outside of the available service area." Although the OEM cower capacity study is not totally completed, Orrin Thompson Homes is confident the City of Monticello will develop necerocary capital improvement programs to correct any idontifiod sewer capacity restrictions that may impact the timely development of the Hermes property. 8421 Wayms Blvd. a Sults 300 • Gaiden Valley, MN 55428 • Sr4.7333 / � `D In the mean time, acquisition of the Eastwood Knoll property, by Orrin Thompson Homes, will give our firm a market presence in the community. This acquisition could "start the ball rolling," provide continuity in the community and give us momentum for the development of the Hermes property. Therefore, Orrin Thompson Homes would like to proceed with the purchase of the Eastwood Knoll property along the following general terms and conditions: 1. Orrin Thompson Homes will purchase an exclusive eighteen (18) month rolling lot option for all platted lots in the new subdivision. 2. The City of Monticello will revise the unrecorded pre- liminary plat to create thirty-eight (38) platted lots, including the existing four (4) platted lots fronting on Meadow Oak Avenue. (It is extremely important to "protect our front door"). 3. Orrin Thompson Homes shall pay $17,000 per platted lot. (38 lots x 517,000/platted lot = $646,000). 4. Orrin Thompson Homes shall pay a $17,000 option deposit. This option deposit shall be paid after the property has been graded, utilities installed and streets constructed. 5. The option deposit shall be credited toward the purchase of the first lot. 6. The option maybe renewed with payment of an additional $17,000 option deposit. 7. The closing of the first lot will be contingent upon the following: a. Environmental clearance. b. Archaeological clearance. C. U.S. Home Corporation's Asset Management Committee approval within ninety -days. (Orrin Thompson Homes is a wholly-owned division of U.S. Home Corporation). d. Soils suitable for Orrin Thompson Home's intondod use. o. Clear title to the property. f. Covenants and Rostrictions suitable for Orrin Thompson Home's intended use. (We will provide you with a sample draft of restrictions and covenants). g. The City of Monticello will create thirty-eight (38) single family detached residential lots suitable for Orrin Thompson Home's intended use. h. The City of Monticello will create a grading plan suitable for Orrin Thompson Home's intended use. However, the City will not create nor will Orrin Thompson Homes accept any tuck -under lots. (Tuck -under lots will have to be severely discounted to gain market place acceptance). Orrin Thompson Homes will construct one (1) model home on the first lot. This model home will be similar to our model home located in Westbranch Crossings, Plymouth, Minnesota. Orrin Thompson Homes will incorporate the marketing of the Eastwood Knolls subdivision into our metropolitan - wide advertising campaign. In summary, Orrin Thompson Homes desires to enter the Monticello market place. We see a demand for new single family detached housing in the area and we think the Eastwood Knoll and Hermes property have sufficient amenities and locational advantages to support this demand. Sincerely, �� Bruce Pankonin Development Manager ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES Ire 0 SUMMARY EMMERICH PURCHASE PROPOSAL 1. Total purchase price (33 : $20,600) $676,600 LESS: $1,600 per lot for grading corrections on 4 tuck -under lots (6,000) $670,600 2. Down payment of $20,600 applied to last lot. 3. Provide letter of credit for 26% of improvement costs ($416,000 : 2696) (improvements actually assessed against each lot) a $104,000. If semi- annual assessments aren't paid, the City could cash in LOC. 4. Purchase money mortgage for land coats (approx. $233,600 balance). 6. Agreement to purchase minimum number of lots per year (i.e., 6 or 7 lots, etc.) 6. Price for lots to remain at $20,600 for 2 years (subject to adjustment after 2 years). 7. Would agree to establishment of covenants and minimum values by areas within development. EMMEASTYRO: W21M (/!r EASTWOOD KNOLL RFP SUMMARY EASTWRFP.WK4: 04/20195 (29) WrighlEdinaI Century 21 I Sherburne I Realty I Realty I Dom Frle Romit Herbst f. Market AnalwiwVricinn AWstanoe I x l x I x I x 2. Marketing Program Sign x x x x I Plat -drawing slim x x I Brochures prepared x x x x I Holder on site x I Respond to all Inquiries x x x x I Pre -qualifying buyers x I Advertise in local papers x x x x I I Advertise in Mds paper x I MLS listing x x x x I Hotiinephone x j I Relocation services x I Ad In company manazine x x 13. Complete transaction processing I x I x I x I x 14. Percent commisOon e aagnt legema 10%5% I I I Percent commiWon - ttwo 10% 0% I 1096 15. Term of contract I one year I one year i ---- i -- --- - EASTWRFP.WK4: 04/20195 (29) Dale Florek RMMR' GraduM RMTM* lnsWM (GRO ETIM (8,21298-3358 _ rmtlnm F Mo wm�.n ao �3etro (912133e-4333 sm s 801 66 Fac (8,2)295'5789 Montkoo. MN 55382 West &6urbat:/WrWI CcuMyaiondcdlo Office Ll oar o P.O. Box 66 Monncelkt MN 55362 Office OU) 295.3456 Mean OU) 3354334 Pi4X (612) 295-5789 CITY OF MONTICELLO FROM: DALE FLOREK REt EASTWOOD KNOLL PROJECT EDINA REALTY DEAR SIRS, THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL FOR LISTING YOUR LOTS. I AM VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA, AND HAVE SOLD MANY PROPERTIES IN THAT GENERAL VICINITY. I FEEL YOU TIMING IN LISTING THE LOTS FOR SALE COULD NOT BE BETTER. OUR AREA HAS A SHORTAGE OF USED HOMES "FOR SALE" THUS CREATING A HIGH DEMAND FOR "NEW CONSTRUCTION". THE LOCATION OF THIS PROPERTY IS EXCEPTIONAL FOR THE COMMUTER TO THE TWIN CITIES OR ST CLOUD. WE ARE SEEING A STRONG INFLUX OF PEOPLE FROM BOTH OF THESE AREAS. IN MARKETING YOUR PROPERTY YOU WOULD HAVE THE STRENGTH OF 2,200 SALESPERSONS IN 61 OFFICES, WE HAVE 3 OFFICES IN WRIGHT COUNTY, 1 IN ST CLOUD, AND 1 IN ELK RIVER. OUR OFFICE IN MONTICELLO HAS AT LEAST 8 FULL TIME AGENTS OF WHICH 4 HAVE CONSISTENTLY RECEIVED NATIONAL RECOGNITION FOR BEING IN THE TOP 5% OF AGENTS FROM 12 TOP COMPANIES IN THE COUNTRY FOR THEIR LEVEL OF PRODUCTION. I AM ONE OF THE "DOZEN AWARD" RECIPIENTS. TO UTILITIZE THIS EDINA REALTY SALES FORCE I DO INTEROFFICE NETWORKING BY SENDING FLYERS TO EACH OF THE EDINA OFFICES. I ALSO SEND FLYERS TO ALL LOCAL COMPETING COMPANIES AND SPECIFICALLY TO AGENTS WHO SPECIALIZE IN VACANT LAND AND NEW CONSTRUCTION. SOME OF THE OTHER MARKETING TOOLS WE USE AREt OUR MONTICELLO EDINA REALTY IS A MEMBER OF THE BOTH THE ST CLOUD AND THE MINNEAPOLIS MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE FOR YOUR BEST EXPOSURE TO BOTH MARKETS. A kbwcpMm Rs1r ompW m MAGAZINE AND NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING I AM ENCLOSING COPIES OF ADS I REGULARLY RUN IN LOCAL AND TWIN CITY PUBLICATIONS. I REGULARLY ADVERTISE IN THE MONTICELLO TIMES AND SHOPPER, THE THURSDAY AND SATURDAY PICTURE CLASSIFIED SECTION OF THE MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE, THE REGULAR CLASSIFIED SECTIONS IN THE MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE AND I HAVE 1/2 PAGE COLOR AD THE RUNS MONTHLY IN THE PROPERTY SOURCE MAGAZINE. I FEEL IT IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE LISTOR OF YOUR PROPERTY TO BE A CONSISTENT ADVERTISER IN THESE PUBLICATIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, IN THE 20 TRANSACTIONS I DID IN THE FIRST THREE MONTHS OF THIS YEAR, 85% CAME DIRECTLY FROM AD PUBLICATIONS AND ONLY 3% FROM THE MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE. HOTLINE FEATURE FOR SALE SIGNS THAT HAVE A TELEPHONE NUMBER THAT CAN BE CALLED NIGHT OR DAY THAT WILL GIVE INFO ON THE LOTS AND WHO TO CALL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. I AM ENCLOSING A BROCHURE ON THE HOTLINE PROGRAM. SIGNAGE I WILL SUPPLY 2 - 4X8 DEVELOPMENT SIGNS THAT WOULD SHOW A PLOT PLAN AND WOULD SHOW WHAT LOTS WERE SOLD, PENDING AND AVAILABLE. I WOULD ALSO KEEP A BROCHURE BOX STOCKED WITH DEVELOPMENT INFO FOR INTERESTED PEOPLE TO TAKE WITH THEM. OFFICE TOURS I WILL PERSONALLY CONDUCT OFFICE PRESENTATIONS TO ALL LOCAL OFFICES. (EDINA REALTY AND ALL COMPETING COMPANIES) RELOCATION SERVICES EDINA REALTY IS THE SINGULAR REPRESENTATIVE IN MINNESOTA OF PHH HOMEEOUITY, THE NATIONS OLDEST AND LARGEST RELOCATION COMPANY. THIS OPENS UP YOUR SALES OPPORTUNITY TO PEOPLE TRANSFERRING FROM ANYWHERE IN THE NATION. GUARANTEED SALES PROGRAM EDINA REALTY HAS A PROGRAM THAT HELPS PEOPLE TO MOVE BY BUYING THEIR EXISTING PROPERTY IF THEIRS DOESN'T SELL WITHIN 120 DAYS OF LISTING. I AM ENCLOSING A BROCHURE ON THIS PROGRAM ALSO. "AS GOOD AS SOLD" POSSIBLE rn� ACCES9 WE ARE CURRENTLY WORKING ON GETTING A LOCAL CABLE ACCESS SHOW TO SHOWCASE OUR LISTINGS. EA]� COMMENTS QE COVENANTS 1. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE - SIDING AND COLOR SHOULD MATCH HOME 2. MUST HAVE PROVISION FOR MAINTENANCE FREE EXTERIOR, STEEL VINYL, ETC.. 3. HOW WILL THE A.C.C. DETERMINE VALUE? IT MUST USE SQUARE FOOTAGE GUIDELINES, % OF BRICK FACED FRONTS, AND FRONT YARD SOD AND PLANTING MINIMUMS AND ASPLHALT OR CEMENT DRIVE (HARD SURFACED) 4. POSSIBLY CONSIDER MAKING 3 CAR GARAGE MANDATORY AS TO PROVIDE ENOUGH STORAGE AREA FOR BOATS, RV'S, COLLECTOR CARS, ETC... S. NO COMMENT 6. FINE - DO NOT INCLUDE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. 7. ON TREELESS LOTS YOU MIGHT REQUIRE A CERTAIN NUMBER OF v DIAMETER TREES TO BE PLANTED AND THE LOT SODDED BACK TO THE FRONT CORNERS OF THE HOME AND ATTACHED GARAGE. S. NO COMMENT . A MY QUALIFICATIONS. - R&E FLOREK "MOST RECENT AND PAST" • FULL TIME REALTOR 1991 TO PRESENT. • SILVER CREEK TOWNSHIP BUILDING OFFICIAL SINCE 1994 0 DOZEN AWARD RECIPIENT FOR 1993-1994 *PRODUCED 30 OR MORE TRANSACTIONS PER YEAR WHICH PUTS ME IN A CATEGORY OF THE TOP 5% OF AGENTS IN THE TOP 12 COMPANIES IN THE NATION. » LICENSED TO SELL REAL ESTATE IN 1991 0 COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGE* -SUPERVISOR FOR CATES CONSTRUCTION 1990-1991. 0 SELF EMPLOYED BUILDER -DEVELOPER IN THE PLYMOUTH/WAYZATA AREA 1973-1990. w ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SUPERVISOR 1975-1978 CARPENTER AND CREW FOREMAN 1970-1975 I HAVE ALSO HAD THE EXPERIENCE OF LISTING A MUNICIPAL SUBDIVISION FOR THE CITY OF DECKER. I CO -LISTED IT WITH AN ASSOCIATED OF MINE IN 1992. WE WERE ASKED TO GIVE OUR INPUT ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND IT'S COVENANTS BECAUSE, BEFORE WE TOOK IT OVER, IT WASN'T SELLING. IN SEVERAL YEARS PRIOR TO OUR LISTING THEY HAD ONLY SOLD 4 LOTS. WE WORKED CLOSELY WITH THE ARCHITECTIAL BOARD TO MAKE SOME CHANGES AND HAVE BOLD ALL BUT 4 LOTS OUT OF 36f LOTS. WE HAVE WORKED CLOSELY WITH DAVE GRANNING AND JOE RUDBERG OF THE CITY OF BECKER. EA 7t 1 COMMISSION IN SETTING A COMMISSION RATE, EDINA REALTY CHARGES 10% ON LOT SALES. THE REASON FOR THIS BEING IS THAT AN AD FOR LOTS COSTS NEARLY AS MUCH TO RUN AS FOR A HOUSE AND I BELIEVE IT'S IN YOUR BEST INTEREST TO HAVE AN AGENT WHO ADVERTISES AS EXTENSIVELY AS I DO. I WOULD NEED TO CHARGE 10% ON ALL SALES BROUGHT TO ME BY OTHER AGENTS BUT, I WOULD BE WILLING TO DROP THE COMMISSION TO 6% ON ALL LOT SALES THAT I WROTE DIRECTLY WITH THE BUYER. THIS COULD MEAN A SAVINGS OF 11,000 PER LOT AT 125,000. I CURRENTLY HAVE A BUILDER THAT HAS AUTHORIZED ME TO COMMIT HIM TO S OF THESE LOTS, CONTINGENT ON TERMS AND FINAL LOT PRICING. IN CLOSING, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU AGAIN FOR REVIEWING MY PROPOSAL. IF FEEL MY PRESENT SUCCESS AS A REALTOR AND PAST SUCCESS AS A BUILDER/ DEVELOPER COULD BE OF GREAT SERVICE TO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, I LOOK FORWARD TO HELPING YOU WITH ANY INPUT I CAN THAT WOULD HELP MOVE THIS PROPERTY IN A TIMELY FASHION. t OM. Fl.k aEALTOR- aFu� tf Naft. to0.t'rM Oowr Wnaro • ar. Arms P '9 su: envy I" a *.w c Po mm am r Rte: W 003645 SINCERELY, �% Z DALE FLOREK EDINA REALTY '5L EA 31! ma200 West Broadway, Box 646 Monticello, MN 55362 OFFICE: 612-295-5990 REALTY FAX: 612-295-5723 MR. JEFF O NEILL ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF MONTICELLO 250 EAST BROADWAY MONTICELLO, MN 55382 DEAR MR. O'NEILL: Q ® Mm WE ARE WRITING IN RESPONSE TO YOUR REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR REPRESENTATION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO IN THE MARKETING OF EASTWOOD KNOLL SUBDIVISION. OUR FIRM IS WELL VERSED IN THE SALE AND MARKETING OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND PRIMARILY NEW CONSTRUCTION. WE HAVE REPRESENTED SEVERAL BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS IN MANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS SUCH AS, THE MEADOWS, PAR WEST, BUCK LAKE, HIDDEN PINES, DEVERON GREEN, AND EVERGREEN FOREST. MOST RECENTLY, WE HAVE REPRESENTED VALUE PLUS HOMES IN MARKETING CARDINAL HILLS IN MONTICELLO. OUR COMBINED EFFORTS HAVE RESULTED IN A 53.2% MARKET SHARE OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS BUILT IN THE CITY DURING 1984. THE FIFTY TWO HOMES HAD A COMBINED VALUE OF OVER $4,000,000.00. WE TAKE PRIDE IN THE FACT THAT OUR SPECIALTY IS MARKETING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND NEW CONSTRUCTION. OUR PROPOSAL TO THE CITY FOR REPRESENTATION IN THE EASTWOOD KNOLL DEVELOPMENT IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. A ONE YEAR EXCLUSIVE LISTING CONTRACT COVERING ALL OF THE LOTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT. (A COPY OF THE PROPOSED CONTRACT IS ENCLOSED) 2. A 5% COMMISSION FEE ON SALES THAT DO NOT INVOLVE A COOPERATIVE BROKER. 3. A 7% COMMISSION FEE ON SALES THAT DO INVOLVE A COOPERATIVE BROKER. IN RETURN FOR THE COMMISSION FEES, WE WOULD AGREE TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: 1. ASSISTANCE IN PRICING THE LOTS. 2. A LISTING IN THE THE REGIONAL MULTIPL-E LISTING SERVICE 3. A FULL 4.5% COMPENSATION TO A COOPERATING BROKER. THIS IS THE CUSTOMARY SPLIT AS IF THE LISTING FEE WAS 10%, VVE WOULD AGREE TO PAY THIS EVEN THOUGH OUR FEE IS ONLY 7%. ` 4. PREPARE A MARKETING BROCHURE/PACKAGE TO BE USED AS A HANDOUT FOR PROSPECTIVE BUYERS AND AS A MAILER TO BUILDERS. 'SN 5. CONDUCT SITE TOURS FOR PROSPECTIVE BUYERS. 8. ALL NECESSARY PAPERWORK FOR PURCHASE AGREEMENTS. 7. ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPLETE SALE CYCLE, FROM PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO CLOSING. S. BI -WEEKLY REPORTS TO THE CITY REGARDING THE STATUS OF SALES AND MARKETING ACTIVITIES. 9. SIGNAGE AND ADVERTISING IN THE LOCAL MEDIA AND THE SHERBURNEAVRIGHT PROPERTY SOURCE MAGAZINE. IN REVIEW OF THE RESTRICITIVE COVENANTS WE WOULD SUGGEST THE FOLLOWING: 1. ALLOW THE USE OF MAINTENANCE FREE VINYL SIDING ONLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH BRICK OR STONE ACCENTS. THIS IS THE PREVALENT CHOICE FOR BUYERS IN THIS PRICE CATEGORY YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO ESTABLISH. A GOOD QUALITY VINYL PRODUCT HAS JUST AS MUCH ESTHETIC VALUE AS CEDAR OR STUCCO AND MORE READILY MEETS THE MAINTENANCE FREE NEEDS OF TODAYS BUYERS. 2. ADOPT SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIREMENTS RATHER THAN ATTEMPTING TO CONTROL THE DEVELOPMENT ON AN IMAGE OF MARKET VALUE BASIS. YOU HAVE ALREADY RESERVED THE RIGHT TO INSPECT THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRITY. IMPLEMENTING A SIZE REQUIREMENT WOULD ELIMINATE ARGUMENT ABOUT WHAT CONSTITUTES THE APPEARANCE OF A $150,000.00 MARKET VALUE. A SIZE REQUIREMENT COMBINED WITH A ROOF PITCH REQUIREMENT OF AT LEAST 8/12 WOULD IMMEDIATELY DICTATE THE MINIMUM STANDARD OF VALUE AND EASE THE BURDEN OF THE ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE IN DETERMING AN APPEARANCE OF MARKET VALUE. THE REQUIREMENTS WOULD HAVE TO BE SET AFTER THE PRICE OF THE LOTS HAD BEEN DETERMINED. WE APPRECIATE HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT OUR PROPOSAL AND LOOK FORWARD TO THE POSSIBILITY OF REPRESENTING THE CITY. WE GUARANTEE OUR LISTING AGREEMENTS TO BE FULFILLED WITH THE UTMOST DILIGENCE AND PROFESSIONALISM. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US AT ANY TIME WITH YOUR QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. SINCERELY: DANIEL R. FRIE JOHN J. VAN ALLEN EXCW SIVE RIDNT TO SELL LISTING CONTRACT •.• PROPOSAL... Tbbrm ypw•dq•M Wr�a•AmnOwd NEIILTOHS-. •d1c1, q•wnM YEY1 wMnp aAd Or PmswdNM bP. I. Do p. Pp 1 d p1• DEFINITIONS Tttl CabALLwdwNj,D,(,g M KNOLL SUBDIVISION. MONTL &W, IL�V�ambOn �M •y, L„t ur n 72f I•Ib.l. ••Yb„• Mwru:J�B3�0l�.BPat ,•,• rol. Mwd ww. aNlwl. mM Io UDN BTD Iwo,%nM •fII.tM '10 BB ���w\ M BE uEEF7ill upbnMg101•Ng lw.lw Tb Ca Ort• ro_r10 •Mlwwil.Sppm.wi T. B.D• ro_.bwcbrpA pugtlDmNM O.NO•MYrwNYbwYln.YbY.MYP10•"Fa B•IN'•p1w4 •bd.buM4. IPbwdY.O pYmw ft. MMMbwd•MWgw 1 S.—OALB1. Ptl Yry P4 puA pw•..M —m. MLS oO.bqPwm.wpp NM pa0.PIT I A..ddV rwd rwAwN YbmWbn nmwWd b NMwM dNM PODFnY NYm M DMD.ODwF1'• pwMMM.bDfF Yl8 wM...•MIb•. REALTORBd dM mm •.Id— ofOMwd,IwwmM.N NMI wtl UMM DOES NOT g N vw wdwh w -o wmmmw mYw w1Y 1.M�b.dwbOwbw04 lowmp•wwonQw IW NgNbWNM P.YrsWwbq bnmmymlwwwwbwM�IMYMNw•MbNwb lwaM 4 dMMbNMmgp•bn III1NwFVm Nul1.]1glWbpatlmprylb M•r�tlplNbm bry bvpq•+OnYpr•pmT warnmuwN.lalOntrq " Ym mgko"popowd"ft w of tlCbml4 MY DUTIES 1•8capwawwMVouwI,0bVN4pmpwtY IMwpImgNIM Iw�aA dlbpwMll Nloal•FIbWNr pgwry lq••bpwb•wb pybwyropmwa dfb.NDwa.dgMbM nl'pw.MVMnulwwlpW Ip.Mbp.aiN•I.a..ldarYwrd uFornb.oll wtull.•ItlYr•yd.W.l Mm r•In•b.tlppalb4 br NMadRI'. II,YY.INII[•, lAllOw d.10 •IWTd.I[•wIW IpM.. N D•NOwIT wb b •MMAddpg, wba•gwm a>ncw•wgwgr•Adbw OwFNnw pnMDMY OI•g OmDwb degwpwopMlla.r•IrM pab•NM wrw•n upaNw•omaddwu.ao.rriNupkmnruNesdoo•wbpWM•NprowMNeNvp.ao.nw'N td7•Ywwwb• wMA tr&bOw WMTtl•p••ObN•PbabY Ap.Mnw.N.lY.M IMMwpY.gHb•M wr D.00n1Y IMM IgbtlwaA.Yw n•Ctl•Mry b •.MIM b a Bqw mw. VN• b Nw pO0•.IY YOUR CO\YUSSION N OTO. THE COMMSS1ON RATE FOR TME BALE. LEI.E. RENTAL OR MANAOEIIEW OF REAL PROPERTV DALLBE DETERYYIED BETWEEN EALN NNOIVIDIIAL REAL ESTATE BROKER AND Im CLIENT. 1"P.vv-YpwfOrwwNt91 &bdtMFCnppbaf YlwAa vtl bwd NwpNp•IMbb•dbCww•wwdL .5% 1F IRIGM SHEIM IS REALTY BRINGS '14d^ "ft - . 7\ IP AtAh. BROKER BRINGS THE BUYER b •edneM, u od.• Ou Caw•w wM.1ai IM••wN • BONw Nn a Mdl..p wM W b aM NM pNOwfY w Ow O.M•uw wmM r•aw•N n m.Gaw•a. M 1 I✓,MOM.I rA Op OM pY Nq WM RMd1rY.Nb 1 ApM•bp•IpAM Ob..rl••nbM wApw pN, 1, P ••Naw••dINM 0•4MI I Mw•b/D•.Md p•, bwW 11nd pwmlydRm M dM Mw •RAI• bblw•, nCLdlglrNAw•.•p•••.VgO.dy OMOV1•. I I.�tlb DdY Ta• mMnbww.b N IpO..b•IWpMrp q wW' d fM •NNN•F9 •,•.tl' ITN /b fdd•g d Ol• ••1• li MY aAYw b dbtl bM Nw•. a O) My r•\.AY b M ■ NM pb w10Ib.Ma Ap•aA•N •bN.w n• lNOEI/1" NM WO d• b Nr . I NO a Ip.•d b NN b• wo MF b M w"M b IR Dog DW GIVNw mrlw• rW W d m• NNad uM N.NOMY NN I aE MI M Ia. Wad NM InP.VY: a RIDPrg Ib Lbrw•o m•w n •n•mwlr• bbwNg d+dw•r n ar pmpwly IM bpawup b n duwu•MMrd a ryLa•Acw.p pu w aw IW�•.bpM Mwd.MNw Mtl PMI•y.' df.OM..OM O•dOw1Y W WO dib MqY nwM a M•wdlM Ab YOV lM M.• wlbn 7p Iw•wlw Mwwd OIu oaw•w, V.dn I wa ddpryp•YOIM@Mwgw% o dIrMp D.ND•f1Y4C pa wxiw • 1 I" obwwbMlI w.wlbw•bpry 0 wwwbw dI wpb wbwM,rw.d 4wp mw•wb•u IOVQ •M NM wp4wbnd Na CawM,u..N•. MYCNIwn WMpI1Nd bO•N•bb.IRrr•A.T bb.dYw NFM.MO mo I~ BManoMOq+Mw•dYp/(pMM.IwAmllyr•pMwdgib pO Nr poc••wM.oMNwdrrry p.apwgn MrrgwdgW bNl•m..•.Itlbn aM p4 .YwM NU Comm CLOSM SERVICES NDfICE• THE REAL ESTATE BROKER, REAL ESW E 4ALCSPCRSON, OR REAL ESW E CLOSING ADEM MASNOT A/q W" WRICABLE STATE LAW, MAY NOF EMPRESS OPVMONS REOARDNG THE LEGAL CFFECT OF THE CLOSOM DOpIMENTS OR OF THE CLOSND ITSELF. AM•pocl F—,.•bMpmp.,wwpMN,w.wgMwtlmbwb—w"cb RMbww•wm IubwwnN VMlbw a.nMaw•.nbtl••PwNaAwpw.mnca•rwMnMN•row e>arFdaa•gwb mbing MFwS.p.• im 11.4w•W FQwN. amY•NMMY.mm1.aAFw dmdg ldbwwwbNwlmgbMawtl bwYCwbnd�Ip dlm llwMY.wJIIOMA'dIOO••btlD♦•gMlrm(ndW w) K 1 Mqb b NPN pA. nA..p• blM ibF•p 1 A wave b • qu•N.•N FIbNnO lewd p Mry Ww^Y bcawup N.• Obg �.. ..� NOTICES AND NONDECRWINATION Md11w aw IIM.O.bi•c" Fr.rW. nom d.MMA•IFbONY.Oa'w.•..rN•7wbFa IbMMOwM•acaim FLOW tMp.oD•rIFNW 1lwna blN M.. dwd. wwl dp.•dgpa.P11' MN pYdMl naMwwNMI T/N•Pw I MMb.M I InOI.ILVIN MM I." bpl MIAMbN•N, w wnwMMr n N W-,cOMNddb..• a ,Poddw,bnIDwwnaw ONM•.• d aAOr. It HRpbn, r.wmsagn,w- o.dc.•wdbpdDACY•MIdM•. nrbcop. MFTM pry•bw P...P11w. a bMdY w n 111..N•r•t•rM b/.r w bF✓r1 N.dd.dnctl M m p .O. OOr pib.W,, d•u1• Tb YW •OMbMrygn1 qh ptwV YO.Ip•..1MIAIbMb Wval nbbpbnbwwurlp•.M.Wab7Mn,nrwo ntl,p•FOII wlab mF.pnn bpb'a.weI.•pFdbp wq w.w•IpMxFgnU.s p.wMN AalpYdMIs ift pWVWA!bnrwbtlw Mft n.ow 1q1, p I bnp M Mn.ab b wdatm.wM d Nle AptlMwN, qr pr•rdArg DMF n IYdI •wp., MWr a.a ra'A•Nm P.Nf1F•Nd bYlw AINp.Iw•. dvN b wnOM q mfa•. •N aKb M..040•.IN•b ndWq •I HtlwMNM wbnFYY W Y.N fq..M f0w1 CERTIFICATION INDIVIDUAL TRANSFEROR Bwson IYldM IbIM11M1 Nln•..IM Cea ppbw• N A bw6.M larye.l d • UB M p.00•MY IRd.•w, MMfw b..wd.NO n w.Yg wtl IMJ MM.O10 W. d DM•Mdrw mn lq o MW f pNNaf, d.1N bT M m Ro w[•Cw, T ACI Pllwwwd bwcfwa (1•\N.1 a • gwPlDww>" n0M •NwpA:d wdMm+ f.'IWDOG b7wu*ba.J Cl IMO ICD Rm1.71 bNvmlbbl n RNd P.I:porry Oa Aw IFIRPUII A b lundlq EFD•.II) am WN wtl ."dpd M ub-v IdF-0aM dbw LIMIO GUORL o d N al.p011111m. CWWWV9 IN WW b�m94, IIA •.m. MWm M UMd GtWk w. N N PWWW 10o OWMoa d.ddl,bmeN •rwpalwMwpNbwdflr lbNwa fAww L1\• I1N0 0nb0 Wb rMCOL. YdwNsrwnV, I—paamn w DM LM Lw4ph DMdb••dpwpoV IOft* d1d Ihii-••M.d.NO DS C•.INKtlNM w4 a go OW d MW kn MwAib ww b1d.• a blw, ON,.•w w.N co oft ACCEFtWIM — ------�.— _ -- ACCEFTCDBM -,_ __ — AdWM Ph"— -- - _ ___— _ _ _ flletl - - - -- - --- " adw'1 \NCAI saw" I --' -- — _ - � _ - , 8•\wY Oecul C•CMNY I: — - -1 Mlwbl Excel 101 west Broadway. Box 180 Monticello. Minnesota Fax 295. 5614 Business (612) 295.3300 • Metro 332.6311 Jeff O'Neill N Excel o, wen, t3 oedway, ao t 180 Nontfce➢o. ss9e2 RasWenos (812) 882-5698 Rex (8/ 295581♦ Bus. (81 2959300. Meft 312.8911 Arthur F "Art" Dom , I_`;..3 REALTOR- Mmon Dour C4A ESM Oft. 1. 1ndWff 0.r.ly OWNd Ane Opr.uO City Of Monticello Subject: Proposal - marketing and sale of lots at Eastwood Knoll in Monticello. As a Real Estate agent 1 fed it most prudent and advantageous to the city to have a listing contract on the subject properties with a specific agent at a specific real estate company. By doing so with Century 21 Excel and myself as the listing agent, we could provide: 1. A market analysis to show current prices and provide a justification of our agreed price. 2. A full marketing program. a) signing with our well known Century 21 Excel signs and posts, plus, to include a large 0 x 8 foot Century 21 sign b) professionally done plat drawing sign with prices and other pertinent lot Information c) prepare professional brochures for distribution and band outs d) provide holders on the property to facilitate dissemination of infonnatlonal brochures e) respond to calls and provide additional information regarding the plat f) explain to buyers the development covenants g) pre -quality Interested buyers h) run appropriate ads as needed to maintain constant customer Interest I) cooperate idly with ati other agents and real estate companies In the sale of the properties. The above, 1 feel, Is of great significance in successfully marketing any property. My success as a real estate agent Is because I have DR. IEach OH4co Is IndWrldantly 0~ And OWatod always believed In the Multiple Listing Concept where any and all agents can bring in buyers and ):E.assilted they will be compensated for their efforts. OWX through a proper listing contract between a seller (the City) and an agent with a company like Century 21 Excel can other agents be assured they will be compensated. j} apprupriate htdb" to rrptn4 mpuwc from agents & ba►ytab and to review their comments All offers by any agent with any company would be presented to the city In my presence. Any instructions from the city would be handled by me. Accepted offers would be closely monitored. AU escrow, abstract and title work necessary for a successful closing would be handled by me. The city and Its employees would spend an absolute minimum of tip in any of the process - You would simply be delivered a check upon rJOSIn4_ To accomplish this desirable result takes a full time real estate agent backed by a reputable, well known, company such as Century 21 Excel. Highlights of Century 21 Excel • Nationally recognized: useful for out of town buyers. • Agents with a total of 133 years experience. • Most prime real estate location in the area: conducive for exceptional walkdn trafite. • Agents with extensive contacts with quality area builders to assure to buyers a quality bocce. • Willingness to share with other companies a share of the stales commission to assure any cooperating agent will be compensated. • Excellent relationships with area Title Companies to assure successful closings. 1 personally have nearly 11 years of Hill time real estate experience. To properly market an enhanced area and to obtain cooperation from other agents my fee would be 10% of the wHing price of any ici. To do less would be. In my opinion, a detriment to sales In a quality development. 1 would also look for a listing contract of one year. RespecdWly Submitted, airu aa -'I &%� Arthur Dorn, Agent Century 21 Paces Recent Reference: Owners - Berndt Pond Estates Gary & Sherry Berndt 45861 Co Rd /18 Brooten MN 56316 phone: 612-352-2484 M) DATE: April 19, 1995 TO: Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator FFiONt James A. Herbst (Edina Realty) RE Proposal for Marketing and Sale of Lots at Eastwood Knoll in Monticello Dear Jeff; If the city decides to market their property with a real estate company, you can be assured that with the right marketing and advertising program those lots at Eastwood Knoll will move fast. I personally know of 3 people who want to pursue and purchase a lot there. I have walked over this area at least two times and have been inquiring with Mr. Rick Wolfsteller on different occasions since last November, so I am eager and hungry to sell the lots for the City as fast as possible. As for the requests the City wants from real estate firms, I would have a professional appraiser assist me (and the city if you want) to reach a fair and equitable price for each lot so the city gets enough money out of this sale to cover any and all expenses. In the area of marketing, I would advertise in not only local papers, but through MLS (Multiple Listing Service) and other magazines that Edina Realty has access to, site visits would be no problem that would also be extremely important. As far as providing information to prospects, Edina has an over abundant supply of that and I would work close with the city staff in regards to maps and other history that would be pertinent to the sale of these tots. As for organizing the closing processes and transactions of sales, that is where there are many steps to perform but that is why they collect commissions. As for a proposal for fee payment on a per lot basis, I think that whoever Is awarded the listing should sit down with the proper personnel from the City and find out what Is needed by the City so the taxpapyers will not have to eat any costs, then proceed with the real estate agent, appraiser, etc., and arrive at that figure also keeping In mind that some lots are going to be more valuable than others. As far as commissions are concerned, they should be In the actual cost of each lot. If there is any negotiations involved, that would come out of the agent's commission. I think the rate of commission should be at 10% If you're going to attract other agents to bring over prospective clients, once the commission is lowered you automatically slow down MLS custumers. If you keep the commission at the going rate - 10% - and each agent can negotiate from there. I thank you all very much for looking over my proposal and I promise you you will not be disgusted in choosing me. Enclosed is a buyer's packet which would also pertain to land/lot buyers. Thanks again) P� Jim Herbst (a- Council Agenda - 4IW95 re. Consideration of uurchasina a seas detector for the sewer department W.S.) ,1. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUP: The City currently has two tri -gas detectors in the sewer department. These units are used in We water department, sewer collections, construction inspection, and wastewater treatment plant departments. They are used to monitor hydrogen sulfide, oxygen, and flammable gases. The sewer and water department uses their unit every time they enter a confined space where there would be the underground reservoir, water tank, or any of the hundreds of low ground manholes in the community. The wastewater treatment plant personnel use their unit on a daily basis, as does the Municipal Construction Inspector during summer months. Both units must be sent in once or twice a year for calibration. This takes several days. Even though the down times are staggered, we are without a unit for several days and are short a unit when both units are in operation. Consequently, Matt Theisen is recommending we obtain an additional unit which will display and monitor continually four gases: flammable, oxygen, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen sulfide. This would allow us to be able to operate during the summer months, and we can try to get the unite sent in for repairs and calibration during the winter months. Since the new unit monitors and displays all four gases, it will provide an additional level of safety for the workers. Matt Theisen, the Sewer and Water Superintendent, has had demonstrations on several different types of unite over the past few months. He researched not only the level of safety provided by the multi -gas Neotronics mater, but also the overall operational costs, and recommends this unit In preparation for this purchase, we placed an amount of $2,600 in the 1995 budget. Matt has obtained a quote from Davies Water Equipment Co. of Minneapolis for the four -gas Neotronice meter of $1,840, including tax. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The first alternative is to authorize the purchase of the Neotronics four -gas meter from Davies Water Equipment Co. in Minneapolis for $1,840, including sales tax. The second alternative would bo not to purchase the meter. This would create significant problems during the summer months by having to switch meters from one department to the other on almost 26 Council Agenda • 4M"5 a daily basis so we could enter the confined spaces safely. This running back and forth would result in a great waste of time, and more than likely the unit would be needed in two places at one time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council authorize the purchase of the Neotronics four -gas meter as outlined in alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DASA - Copies of brochure on the gas meter. 27 MINIGAS°: Multi -Gas Protection i In Your Pocket! e�rrr.r.er.rrrarrr.r.r.rrr.r.rrr.rararrr.rrr.rrrrr.r.r.r.r.rrrarrr.r•r.rrera• eamaseem e*Goa Baas sea ages mesas ago sees Deese • Rugged and oaeily portable. the MWIGas is Iced for all types of site wank from spot Checks to conflnuous monitoring. he MlniGas is one of the small- est. most rugged multi -gas men - iters on the market. The MWGas otters one, two, three or four gas moNlot- ing and togging to give you protection agaktst flammable, Oxygen and toxic gas hazards. Dealprmd for confined apace entry and Cpot chocks or continuous protacbm In a hazardous area, the Minlaeo meete the needs of a wide range of industilea. U. S. Federal law now requires ompbyers to use gee dotection equipment In the pro - assessment and maintenance of the can. food space, workplace (29th 1910.148). Canda has also bean aflocted with WHMIS, Bill 209, and many other new safety regulations Data logging is ova9- ebb to record workor ogwure to hazard. ous oases. FEATURES One. two, three or four gas mod- els. oaels. The MWGao can be lfnod with one, two. thm as four gm centers for continu- ous monitonng on all channels. Sensors are available for Flammable pas, Oxy- gen, Carbon Monoxide and Hydrogen Sine. Geta logging. The Mh4as stores up to 40 hours of exposure profiles and session peaks on a rotatMp log. Data can be downloaded to a PC for analysis, using dedicated software, or It will be automatF Bally overwrlaen if data records are not required to be kept. Rugged A die-cast, non -sparking metal ease gives the MtrdGas universal application in the harshest environments. The case, which is made of zinc alloy and finished in matte black. provides protec- tion from radio frequency huerterence (M), The unit is NEMA 4 rated, therefore it Is dust and water resistant Pocket else. The MWGas fits natty into a shin or overall pocket with the sensors powboned above the pocket fine. A pocket dip allows the monitor to be won Comfortably fnaide or outside the pocket or on a beh. Two body harnesses, wdtioh position the monitor in the workers breathing zone. come with the unit. Intsrdtanpsable dry cell or NICd baft y pecks The Mh4as can be used with either an alkali dry cell or NiCd bat. tery pack. Battery packs dip on t0 the monitor, and can be quickly charged in e harerdow anon without tho need for spe- cial tools. A tow battery wemirg irdkatos when the battery Is 30 minutes from ex. haustlon. tnstentaneoua. STEL atld TWA toxic elarms. Short Term Expoet ore Limit (STEL) and Time Weighted Average (TWA) alarms give workers ample warn - Ing where accumulated exposure may be life threau". These alarms permit continued operation in tho workplace wihen short form rated fi88 of a gas oca r which aro not dangerous In cortcemratbn or duration. In alarm node, a bright red wamkg lamp flashes on the display panel and is accompanied by a No decibel audido alarm. Palk tpdtnp. A standard peak read - Ing hxotion allows you to recap maximum toxic, flammable and oxygen readings as wall as minimum oxygen readings. Lags, beck IR liquid crystal dtr play. Aclear dighatdisplay Movideseasy incl nrig of parameters. Resdkgs far flammable gas In percent LEL or percent by volume (specffy tNtert ordeft). Oxy- gen xMgen in percent by volume. and toxic gas in panapamlpbn(ppm)are prairldild. Ago/ no go version is tivaltable wetidt shows readings but Nmdy giva des audibb and Must alarms 0 e hazard is 0 79 is The backlight is available at the press of a button and may be locked on for commu- us operation. The backlight is automab- oally activated in alarm mode. Simultaneous or Single Gas Dis- play. Two types of displays are available depending on your needs. A standard simultaneous display shows all gas chan- nel readings continuously. Alarge. single gas display allows you to select through each Individual gas channel. 4nb'rrau:Wly sale and nwnufactured to ISO 9001. The MlniGas is designed to comply with international intrinsic safety standards to Ex Ia s IIC T4 and mining approvals. All Neotronres instruments - tion is manufactured to the strip intema- tional quality standard ISO 9001. MSHA (Pan 22) approved units are available for mining applications. These MiniCas units are available with single gas displays to monitor for up to three gases (oxygen. Oammabfes and carbon monoxide). Quick self test and warm up. In only 10 seconds from switch on the moni- tor performs a self lest routine and is ready for use. Comprehensive sell tests Check that the ignitor L9 fully functional. Auto-2aro and Span. These func- ins can be Initiated only within the first J seconds after switch on. This time limit safeguards against accidentally initiating the functions in a contaminated atmo- sphere. Shnplo callhrptlon. Tia user presses a button to activate tiro calibration mode, and applies gas. The easily accessible ONIOFF bunons are used to adjust zero and span readings. APPLICATIONS For confined apace entry. spot chocks, or continuous protection in a haz. ardous area, the Minidas to Ideal for a wldo range of Industries. Apphcations include' Petrochemical a Public UtilOioo Water and Waato Wotor Treatment Onshore Connructwn Marino and Air Transport As, Mining Sicol arid Non-Forrous Production Bulk Liquid Nitrogon It Oxygen Processors plate With either a dry cell orreChargeable battery pack• sensors, pocket dip, a har- ness set, ellen keys. user manual and user card. A confined space kit is avail- able and includes a black carrying case with foam insen, a hand aspirator and an earphone attachment. A wide range at optional accessories Is available: Fast / sloe battery charger: 220V 50Hz, 240V 5011z. 1 I 60Hz or 12116V DC, providing lull charge in under 6hours with protection from overcharge, which eliminates Iii battery memory and maxi- mizes battery life. Trickle charge battery charger: 220V 50Hz. 240V 50Hz. 110V 60Hz, 121 16V DC or 24raV DC. A lower cost, slow charger providing a full charge over a longer period. The use of this charger requires discharging of bananas. Electric sample pump: dips onto the monitor gig and is se lf-powered by an integral III battery, operating for 8 hours between charges. The pump is partied intrinsically safe and incorporates a low flow alarm. Bulb -operated hand aspirator pump: attaches to the gig, and allows the user to perform pro -entry checks with ease. Ball float clips onto the end of the aspirator hose so that when accidentally lowered into water the aspirator hose remains above the Surface. AUGGED DMq" METAL CAN is DUST AND WARM AE WTYM ANG moms Mn NhotrcrN+rN Leather carrying case: gNesaddi- itonal protection to the mon,:or in harsh environments It has a loop for attach- ment to a bell Rubber boot: provides additional protection to the monitor in harsh environ- ments. Made from antistatic rubber, win strong impact resistance. it can be used with harness. Earphone attachment: provides direct transfer of the audible alarm to rile oser's eat ,han aork;ng in a nosy Cmi. ronment. Gas calibration kits: allow the user to calibrate the sensors as well as perform gas response tests. Safe -T -Cube: enables tne WniGas to be used for area monitoring, The III Gas fits into the cube which prowdes a high output audible and visual alarm indi- cation. The cube is self -powered by an integral rechargeable battery and will op- erate for a minimum o1100 hours between charges, it nor alarm occurs sve WLLV Dt$*MD GNLL Allows GAB eoNCENTAA710Nl IN WNiIE VNOTICTINO st"QR5 rMoa e"Fimu" TO wAELF x ELEMtrAa OvcN AS DUST NIONr ASYr•o11A MAA�sAA Yrb LANoe s At Alnt a A AQUrorAL or "a MWlO CLEAa AIADaros or Orfs CONClMIaARoq ACCESSORIES • ABOVE: A slorxfard kmWtanoaus d solar Gru;ws 01 005 Cnanro 100dings continuoLvA & ABOVE RIGMT: A largo. Anglo gas cl=y aaa.g You to The MnGas monitor l0 eupplgd Com- SOCCithlpughpaCh rndividualgas Chahnol K Z Y D TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MONITOR RANGE: FlammOob 0 to 99% LEL (W 0.0 m. 9% VOL) OntVan0 to 25% VOL Carbon MaIen0e 0 a 999 pin", Hydrogen S'4' 0 M 499 ppm RESOLUTION: Flammable 1%LEL Ip 001%VOL) en O.yg0.1%VOL Carbon M-0. 1 w"I HWtoWn SLdkm Ippm ACCURACY: FI.—bb c3%LEL <50%LEL' :5%LEL >50%LEL Oxygenr03%VOLQ 116%-24%VOL) Carbon Lamoada15 ppm at 100 ppm Hydrogen SuRfOe is ppm .150 ppm AR:uomla an aPebiaraNre Fahb.awbP"ca"nal— ST ANDARD aaSTANDARD ALARMS a FIIRraIrbM Nstamrrow: Mar— n AU 10% NEL 1011 LEL Oxygen lnatmlanooua: De9cw y 19.5% 195% Enndalrm 23.5% 230% Tom Wdntattaols: Carbon M.—M 200 PP,, 300 ppm Nydropen Su1tla 50 ppm 20 ppm Tonle STEL: Carbon Moro -ids 100 ppm 200 ppm HyQr— S-1-ft1 spp. 15 ppm Toxic TWA: C.A— Moroade 35 ppm 25 ppm Hydrogen Subtle 10 ppm 10 ppm Au®aY Alarm: BOdSA at ore rear DOW in.. aaeHpa w swim H—.0 b Blah DISPLAY: Lloud CMM" DSPIay. rM almauW p-W-AlIDraua aipay of pea porranbeaorn. POWER SUPPLY: Ractw9ambb NlCd or Dry Cell in . AAA) bandy pack BATTERY CAPACITY: Reclwpa bre: 10 noun nWw.m Dry CMI: 20 trona mmu.arl In5arrl: 6 noun I—I (mK Chlorm) OPERATING TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY RANGE: DeP,Wcm won sones rated STORAGE TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY RANGE (Sanaera ra—MI •29°!' to .50-C. • Iee a • 123"F 30 to 99%RH con imus ACCESSORY PART NUMBERS Dry Coe Dan" Pack P325-92MOD Nxd SWWV Ppck P325.929MI Fad I SIOa Es" Cnrga• PMMC•F 11000 TnckV Charge Baaory Carpe PMC•T1,G-00 Canhrd Specs Emry Ka KGOD-0001.30 Elacln: Sampo Pump a)01 cIM`w KBOO-0177.30 DIM-OP—Mo Horn A-Poa Pure P300d706-0D I Bae Flop, Pp86.O.L100 Hanaao P300 -0167d0 Rube. Bad POSI.OW-00 Loatne Carryaq Cepa "5000001.33 E.0— AnppanoN P300-071000 So Mo, Ona FIRM P300-171300 DIMENSIONS: RaCneprbM: N6mm . 70mm . 165,-1 Dry Cad: 14: (Oepm). Yl: (WtlN). 6'(Leq I. (46mm . 70— . 152mn). WEIGHT (saclumnp batsHas): Redlnpeeab: t a. to oe. (650g). Ory n6: I a. 9 oe (720g). INTRINSIC SAFETY APPROVALS: EASEEFA Cert, m. E. 93Y2379% (Ea m 3 0C Ta). MSHA(PW 22) UL approve Pendng PUMP FLOW RATE: 300. pe ,nus mrarruan. OPERATING TOME: a Iau'a. POWER SUPPLY: ".rrW MCd MCMargoab"o battory. TIME: RECHARGE TE: 14 r— CHARGER POWER SUPPLY: 220V 50Ht. 240V 50 H7, I NGV 60Mz. 12 to 16V DC Or 24 a 32V DC(VIO" C" or"). CHARGE TOM: FasValow drape: 6 lloua nlarawm Trickle chergr: 19 Norma nnoabl4m. OPERATING TEMPERATURE RANGE: MC b.aMC:.32'F 10. t0a"F STORAGE TEMPERATURE RANGE: •20-C b .SOC. 41F to .122�F OPERATIIO HUMMM RANGE: 0 to 99% RH STORAGE HUMIDITY RANGE: 0 MOM RH DIMENSIONS: 2%,(Oavm) . 4% ri mn) . r(LoncMI. (&%—. I10—. 17amm) MFY.IITl al 1. nt 411)rMj) WARRANTY: - - - - - - - Thr 4WIOAS' Cdrrlao o ano Ill War aClnPnlY. axckldm malas..1:1— am -0.111 fod mod `cawo DISCLAIMER: - An Nxcxlr 0 YK,bunrrbporl IIs] MX=nag Drlomrres or4aas Hpaa—. M9" pn,OYa d.aP mlRl ba meds ap td M MYablay for Io — WhImI g CalbOmn. That reap"b0ty ma 00" w M soak a OV aM ma a No daarla m s e1.t b" an o.paomd p a)pre by Naotrac NEGTROMCI a ppb M n a Oorlrol DpYCaa Ad1YnWabpl ypram pa"Itcoa,. Our GSA mmol —00 • G54OF.2304A . �IXSTRq)IfTCD DY NEOTRONICS DAVIES WATER EOUIPMENT CO. OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. 4010 LGka B(MZ0 Avonuo North Pea Oars ba. 3N. Oanawaa Oavpa 300MM" 7....� G.+. a- . d..a..a. O—P 3mo1 41 n Mir—spas. Mlmonoto 55429 N E O T R O N I C S Ta'0r'Pa 1ie') &25-0e0d Fam"aa I'e" ev'e'n LOW (B1 593.258/ Toa Pm, (MOA 63"= M pia IIIA anal Canaan ' Y ,WAM I-eog-922-3499 A momber of tho NootroMa TechlAAM PLC Group P ISO 9001 Council Agenda - 4/24/85 ,9"ideration of cha p order 11 for Citv P1,9 ect A93 -W. Public Works Facilitv Fxoansion and Renovation. PhasscL H. U.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Shingobee Builders is well underway with the expansion and renovation of the Public Works Facility, Phase 11. The fmindation is in place for the sand/salt shed, and the footings have been poured for the fill-in between the existing two buildings to house the oil storage room and wash bay. In the front portion of the building, the soil correction performed by City crews and Brenteson Construction went well, as did the installation of the new 4 -inch water service for sprinkling installed by City crews. Shingobee has completed the foundation and much of the inner block work for the front portion of the building. During the submittal of the materials and construction of some of the foundations, however, we did discover a couple of problems which require additional funds. Both of these problems are changes which stemmed from making cuts a little bit too deep to stay on budget for the rebidding of the Phase II project. The first problem or change involves the two entrances to the front portion of the building, the east entrance and the south entrance. During the redesign process, we removed the supports for the front entrance slabs assuming we could float the slabs on granular soils. During a routine inspection the Building Official, Gary Anderson, noted this and requested that we install supports, as any movement in the slabs would cause problems with the entry doors themselves. The General Contractor on the site, Shingobee Builders, concurred with this, and the architect stated that there should not be much movement in the slabs with the granular soils, but it would be best in his opinion to install the supports to limit future problems. The cost of installing the support and foundation under both of the entry slabs totals $500. The second change involves the three-phase power and the heating system. Again, in order to reduce the cost and scope of the project, we removed the three-phase power from the Phase 11 addition and went with single-phase. The estimated savings on the project was approximately $4,00045,000. During the equipment submittal, it was noted that the heating and ventilation system for the wash bay/paint bay was not available with single- phase power, even after checking with several different manufacturers (due to its two -speed configuration, which is necessary for proper heating and ventilation of the bay). Consequently, the bidders included only a single - speed, single-phase unit in their bids. The cost to switch back to a two - speed, three-phase heating and ventilation system and to provide a 100 amp three-phase sub panel to service these units is $1,765. 28 Council Agenda - 4/24/95 We are looking at some possible deducts which would cover a portion of the change order costs, but it was necessary to install the slab foundations, and the heating and ventilation system must be ordered now due to the long lead time. Consequently, we ask that the City Council approve these changes totaling $2,265 at this time. H. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The first alternative is to approve change order 41 in the amount of $2,265 for adding two entry slab foundations and switching the heating and ventilation system for the bay area to two -speed, three-phase. The second alternative would be not to approve the change order. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATW. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council approve change order 01 for the Public Works Facility, Phase A, as outlined in alternative 01 above at a cost of $2,265. Copy of memo from Doug Wild, Architect, OSM. 29 P. =m client 1XIMI—woo— By Pmject shm —,-01— Projectmo. ---,OM&40 Date!!!qmq* ftwir., FWO Avhc4w am n�a fw %Iw ,Ooft*,. VAIr Vpp &0 Ah SCC 000 bdD oo v, agow v Aczawo" z 1VAM. ISWO.00 lk a+ p Oal AMD, WA w4u,04 k*bNNf;#I - OA "Pow oN. oat - if. AWN dAkt W*M (W be &wow CAP &0.00 Council Agenda - 4124196 1e• Consideration of adopting a resolutign authorizing the fire departmeng to enter into a co9nj3ratiye mutual aid agreement with other Wright Countv communities. (R.WJ i1. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Recently the fire departments within Wright County have been trying to put together a standard mutual aid agreement that would cover all communities in Wright County for fire protection services. Each community is being asked to consider adopting a resolution agreeing to join the Wright County Mutual Aid Association for joint and cooperative use of fire personnel and equipment. In the past, the Monticello Joint Fire Department has had separate mutual aid agreements with a num)-v of surrounding communities such as Maple Lake, Buffalo, Big Lake, and Albertville as examples. The purpose of any type of mutual aid agreement is to have backup services available for assistance with larger fires and also to provide standby services for neighboring communities in the event they are combating a large amount of fires. Mark Wallen, Monticello Fire Chief, has recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution agreeing to participate in the Wright County Mutual Aid Association. Joining the Association does not increase our liability in any fashion and basically will take the place of some of our present agreements we now have with other Wright County communities and creates one uniform document. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Adopt the resolution authorizing Monticello Joint Fire Department to, , , h participate in the Wright County Mutual Aid Association agreement. '.� 2. Do not authorize participation at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As noted earlier, it is the recommendation of the Fire Chief, Mark Wallen, that the City participate in the Wright County Mutual Aid Association agreement. By adopting the agreement, the City is merely agreeing to be a member of an association covering Wright County communities that Monticello has many mutual agreements with now. Proposed resolution for adoption; Copy of agreement. 30 RESOLUTION eli- Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption. WRIGHT COUNTY MUTUAL AID ASSOCIIATION AGREE 4ENT PARTICIPATION APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has reviewed the Wright County Mutual Aid Association Agreement for the joint and cooperative use of fire personnel and equipment; and WHEREAS, the cities participating in this agreement have designated the group to be known as the Wright County Mutual Aid Association; and WHEREAS, the cities desire to share fire per ,onnel and equipment when deemed necessary, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Wright County Mutual Aid Association Agreement for the joint and cooperative use of fire personnel and equipment, a copy of which is attached, is hereby approved and that the proper City officials are directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the City as a participating member of the Association. The foregoing resolution was duly supported by Councilmember , upon a vote being taken thereon, the following members voted in favor thereof - the following members voted against: the following members abstained: the following members were absent: WHEREUPON, said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 24th day of April, 1995. Mayor City Administrator WRIGHT COUNTY MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR USE OF FIRE PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT 'This agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59, which authorizes the joint and cooperative exercise of powers common to contracting parties. The private non- profit firefighting corporations are made parties to this Agreement as agents of governmental units, put== to the parties' general contracting authority. The parties wish to create a regional Mutual Aid Association, hereafter called the Wright County Mutual Aid Association, for the purpose of making equipment, personnel and facilities available to each other upon request. This agreement is intended to give each party the authority to send its equipment and personnel into the other communities and to provide for a Operating Committee to administer this amument. 11. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS For the purpose of this Agreement, the terms defined in this section shall have the meanings given them below. Subd. 1. "Assistance" means the providing of fire personnel and equipment, fire investigators, fire inspectors, fire educators, fire instructors, training personnel and associated equipment and facilities. Subd. 2. "Emergency" means a sudden and unforeseen situation requiring Immediate action. Subd. 3. 'Parry" means a governmental unit which is a Party to this Agreement. Subd. 4. "Requesting official" means the person designated by a Parry who is responsible for requesting Assistance from other Patties. Subd. 5. 'Requesting party' means a party which requests assistance from other Pte• Subd. 6. 'Responding official' means the person designated by a Party who is responsible to determine whether and to what extent that Party should provide Assistance to a requesting Party. Pay Subd. 7. 'Responding party" meats a parry which provides assistance to a requesting Subd. 8. 'Specialized activities' -- non -emergency assistance to include but rpt be limited to: fire investigators, fire inspectors, fire educators, fine instructors, training personnel and associated equipment and facilities. Subd. 9. 'Extraordinary Services' means emergency assistance that includes activities beyond the normal scope of fire fighting, such as but not limited to hazardous materials incidents, high level rescue, or dive rescue. II7. PARTIES The Parties to this Agreement are those entities which approve this Agreement and execute a separate signature page in accordance with Section VM. The Parties constitute the membership of the Wright County Mutual Aid Association. Upon the adoption of a resolution by its governing body, an executed copy of this Agreement shall be forwarded by the member party to the secretary of the Wright Courcy Mutual Aid Association together with a certified copy of the resolution authorizing the Agreement. Other entities may become a party to this agreement by complying with the conditions provided in the Association rules and by applying to and receiving approval of three-quarters of the then existing Parties, and by executing a separate signature page for this Agreement. Any party may withdraw from membership at any time upon thirty days written notice to the other members. A Party may be removed from membership only by a vote of at least three-quarters of all other Parties to the Agreement and only for the following causes; failure to comply with the terms of the Agreement or a failure to pay dues or its share of other reasonable costs of the Association. Action by any Party which is required or permitted under t1his Agreement will be evidemxd by: • for a municipality, a resolution adopted by the governing body, or for a non-municipality, a letter executed by an official with sufficient authority to bind that party which recites the basis of that authority. IV. PROCEDURE Subd. 1. Whenever, in the opinion of a requesting official, there is a need for assistance from other parties, such requesting official may, at his/her discretion, call upon the responding official of any other parry to furnish assistant to and within the boundaries of the requesting party. Subject to the limitations set forth herein. it is the intention of the parties to this Agreement to cooperate In the event of an emergency by malting the necess ry assistance available to a requesting parry without undue delay. Subd. 2. Upon the receipt of a request for assistants from s party, the responding official may authorize and direct the Fire Department personnel under his/her control to provide assistance to the requesting party. Whether the responding pmrty provides such assistance to the requesting party and, if so, to what extent aucb assittance is provided shall be determined solely by the responding official (subject to such supervision and direction as may be applicable to him/her within the governmental structure of the party by which he/she is employed). Failure to provide assistance will not result in liability to a party. Subd. 3. When a responding party provides assistance under the terms of this Agreement. it may in urn request assistance from other parties as "backup" during the time that it is providing assistance outside its boundaries. Subd. 4. Whenever a responding party has provided assistance to a requesting party, the responding official may at any time recall such assistance or any part thereof to the responding official in his/her best judgement dams this necessary to provide for the best internis of his/her own community. Such action will not result in liability to any party. Subd. 5. The requesting party shall be in command of the emergency scene. The personnel and equipment shall be under the direction and control of the requesting party until the responding official withdraws assistance. Subd. 6. A responding party shall be responsible for its own personnel, equipment, and for injuries or death to any such personnel or damage to any such equipment, except that unused equipment provided by the responding party shall be returned to the responding party by the requesting party when circumstances permit this to be done. Responding personnel shall be deemed to be performing their regular duties for the responding party. Insurance coverage and any financial compensation shall be the responsibility of the responding party. Each parry waives the right to sue any other party for any workers compensation benefits paid to it's own employee or vohmteer even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other party, it's officers, employees, or volunteers. Subd. 7. Specialized activities of a non-emergency nature may be requested and/or provided by the parties to this Agreement. Subd. 8. No charge shall be made to a party for assistance rendered tinder this Agreement except that a party providing assistance shall be paid for the cost of supplies. A party providing assistance may charge for time and materials for Specialized Activities and Extraordinary Service as provided for in the association riles. V. OPERATING CObIM TPEE The association shall have an Operating Committee to administer this Agreement. Subd. 1. The Chief of each Parry's Fire Department, or designee, shall be the Party's representative to the Association Operating Committee. Subd. 2. It is the responsibility of the Operating Committee to establish rules, policies, and standards and to take other necessary or pnudetn action to administer this Agreement. y Subd. 3. The Operating Committee shall meet periodically, but not less than quarterly to conduct the business of the Association. Subd. 4. The Association is not a separate legal entity. The Operating Committee shall have no authority to own property, enter into contracts, or to receive an expend funds except for routine administrative expenses. VI. RECIPROCAL DEFENSE AND IND0041FICATION The requesting party agrees to indemnify and defend against any claims brought or actions filed against the responding party or any officers, employees, or vohmteers of the responding party for injury or death to any third person or persons, or damage to the property of third persons, arising out of the performance and provision of assistance in responding to a request for assistance by the requesting party pursuant to this Agreement. The intent of the indemnification requitement of this section is to impose on each requesting patty a limited duty to defend and indemnify any responding party for claims arising within the requesting party's jurisdiction subject to the limits of the liability under Chapter 466, Minnesota Statutes: The purpose of creating these reciprocal duties to defend and indemnify is to simplify the defense of liability claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants, and to permit liability claims against multiple defendants from a single occurrence to be defended by a single attorney. Under no circ nutances, however, shall a party be required to pay on behalf of itself and other parties, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Chapter 466, Minnesota Statutes, applicable to only one party. The limits of liability for some or all parties may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for any ply. uiMg�IxestOAVITVI� This Agreement tball be effective upon execution by three-quarters of the entities listed on the attached Exhibit A which is incorporated by reference herein, Each Party shall execute a separate signal ue page and forward that page to the Association Secretary, along with a resolution or letter as provided in Section m. Upon receipt of all executed signature pages, the Secretary shall send a copy of the fully exacted agreement to each member. Upon becoming effective, this Agreemera shall supersede, replace, and void all prior agreements which provide for the existence of the Wright County Mutual Aid Association, and all assets of the Association under those agreements shall be transferred to the Association created pursuant to this Agreement. VM. AMENDMENT This Agreement may be amended or terminated upon ale affirmative vote of three-quarters of the Parties then existing. DATE: (CONTRACTING PARTY) CITY OF BY: ITS: BY: ITS: WRIGBiT COUNTY MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION EXWBIT City of Albertville A City of Howard Labe Albertville Fire Department Howard Lake Fin DepartrraAt P. 0. Box 131 P. 0. Box 736 Albertville, MN 55301 Howard Labe, MN 55349 497-3210 543.3670 City of Annandale City of Maple Lake Annandale Fire Depattum Mep(e lake Fire Depertmm 30 Cedar St E P 0 Box K P. 0. Box 757 Annandale, MN 55302 Maple Lake. MN 55358 274-3055 963.3611 City of Buffalo City of Monticello Buffalo Fire Department Monticello Fire Department 212 Centrnl Ave. P.O. Box 747 Buffalo, MN 55313 Monticello. MN 55362-5391 682-1181 295.2711 333.5739 (Metro) City of Clearwater City of Montrose Clearwater Fire Department Moonse Fin Depattrom P 0 Box 171 P. 0. Box Z5 Clearwater, MN 55320 Montrose, NO 55363 Q 558.2428 675-3717 City of Colcato City of RodMord Cokato Fire Department Rockford Fin Deparanent P.O. Box 298 6031 Main Stmt Cokato, MN 55321 Rockford, MN 55373 286-5505 477-6565 City of Delano City of St. MW mel Delano Fire Department St. Mkbeel Fire Department P. 0. Box 108 P. 0. Box 337 Delano, MN 55328-6174 St. Michael. MN 55370+•0337 972-0550 497.2041 City of Hanover City of South Haven Hanover Flet Deparmrm South Haven Fite Departmem P.O. Box 278 P 0 Box 97 Hanover, MN 55341 Sash Haven, MN $5382 497-3777 City of Waverly Waverly Fire Departrimt P. 0, Box 189 Waverly, MN 55390 6584217 8G z Council Agenda - 4/2"5 19. Consideration of �ubp�ttina a letter is response to the Bagalo Bituminous Gravel pit EAW. W.O.) A. REFERENCE AND 13ACKGROUND: Council is asked to review the attached EAW and proposed City response letter and consider sending the response letter to the County, which is the RGU (responsible governmental unit). B. ALTERNATIVE ACU,M. 1. Motion to approve or modify and approve the letter to the RGU. If Council selects this alternative, the letter will be fazed immediately to the County. 2. Motion to not submit a letter to the RGU. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 01 for reasons outlined in the response letter. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of proposed response letter; Copy of the EAW. 31 MONrLTJ-LO 250 East Broadway P.O. tux 1147 April 21, 1995 Monticello, MN 55362.9245 Phone: (612) 295-2711 Metro: (612) 333.5739 Fax: (612) 295-4404 Wright County Board of Commissioners Mr. Charles Davis, Environmental Health Officer Wright County Planning and Zoning 10 NW Second Street Buffalo, MN 66313 Dear Mr. Davis: On behalf of the City Council, I would like to Worm you that the City of Monticello has concerns regarding the development of a gravel pit and bituminous plant operation as proposed by Buffalo Bituminous in the EAW. The concerns stem from the fact that the proposed location next to the Orderly Annexation Area will place the facility in close proximity to the future southern boundary of the city. The City has a vested interest in prowuting development in this area that will not result in devaluation of property values or result in degradation of the quality of the ground water. Following are specific concerns that should be fully understood before a negative declaration of impact is made. -Ununfi WatVjr Contandnation. It is critical that it be determined that the operation will not contaminato ground water supplies to private wells serving neighboring residences. This is because if contamination would occur, it could result in the premature and expensive extension of the city water systems to the area. Devalgagon of Pronertv Vglueq. The City is concerned that the operation could negatively impact the Quality of life in the area, which would result in a devaluation of residential property values. The EAW must fully demonstrate no impact on adjoining residential areas in terms of the following: a. Noise. The decibel level of mining machinery is a concern. What financial guarantees are in place to assure complotion and maintenance of berm and berm vegetaUon4 (9 Mr. Charles Davis April 21, 1995 Page 2 Dust. Will dust produced by the operation impact the adjoining residences; and if so, what measures are required to control dust? Air Pollution. The EAW notes odor problems only a "small percent of the time" when wind speeds are between 410 knots. The percent of time that the odor is experienced is only one measure of the problem. Define "odor problems" in greater detail. What is the degree of the problem? Could the degree of the problem be unbearable even if experienced only 10% of the time? d. Conditional Use Permit Administration and Enforcement. To what extent is the County committed and capable of enforcing conditions designed to mitigate negative impacts? What financial securities are in place to assure operation of the facility in a manner consistent with the EAW? Thank you for addressing the concerns as outlined above via the EAW/EIS process. Please contact me with your response. Sincerely, Cj�YjOF�IYT CELLO Rick Wolfste er City Administrator RW/kd cc: File `1 Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) NOTE TO PREPARERS Thin worksheet is to be completed by the Responsible Government Unit (ROU) or its ageam. The project proposer muse supply any reasonably accessible data necessary for the worksheet, but is not to complete de final v rorksheet itself. If a complete answer does net fit in the space alloted, attach additional sheets as necessary. For assistance with this worksheet eantaa the Minnow Emimnmetnal Quality Board (EQB) at (612) 296.8253 or (tall -free) I.800.652-9747 (ask ope, r for the EQB erminormeraal review program) or comWt 'EAW Guidelines,' a booldet available from the EQB. NOTE TO_ REVIEWERS Comments must be submitted to the RGU (see item 3) durug the 30 -day comment period fcsilming notice of the EAW in the EQB Morita . (Cornet the RGU or the EQB to team when the comment period ends.) Commerw should address the accuracy int completeness of the information, potential impacts tit may warrant ftmdwr iovoto iso. and the reed for an ELS. If the EAW has been prepared for the scoping of an ELS (see item 4), co mmeno should address the aavracy and completeness of the Information and suggest issues for investigation in the EIS. 1. Pr*ct Title CONDITIONAL USE PRMIT APPLICATION FOR SAND AND GRAVEL EXTRACTION AND OPERATION NT OF AN ASPHALT -HOT -MIX PLA 1. Propeaar Buffalo Bittuninoun. Inc. 3. RGU Wright County Board of Comissionern Ca laci parson Lnon J. xnixnr&Tcr Caatsn pawn Charles Davin Addran P.O. Box 337 smIdde Rnvironmental Health 02 ar Buffalo. Minnenota 5531.3 Adirm Wright County Planning and Zoning Pheme 612--SR2-1271 SWUlo. Minnnnota 55311 Phan 61]--682-3500 4. Ream for EAW Pretwatlae 0 EIS scoping X mandaery EAW 0 citizen petition 0 RGU discnoim 0 Proposer volunteered If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB ride category asmbcr(s) 4410.4300 Stain 12 5. Pryacs locntl EWSEW Section 21 and W1fWWBWW Section 22 110 114 ltactloe Tewnblp 121H Rope 25W coemy Wright CkVTap Monticnllg Anna eapa of nark of the Wnafig a'I de 1A1M a. a county map shoving the general location of the project; i refer to Lig. 2 ) It. copy(ies) of USGS 7.5 mimtm, t :24,000 scala map (photocopy is OK) lodiwing; the project boundaries; ( refer to fl -3. 1) G. a site plan showing all significant project and natural Ratures. (refer to fig . 1, S-25) 6. Datr*dw Give a conplem description of the proposed project and an cillmy facilities (attach additional sheets as neceavy). Emphasize construction and operation methods and features that will came physical n unipudatioe of the emiromrtem or Prod= wastes. Indicate the timiry and &"W of contraction activities. Thio Conditional Uoo Application io for mining and prc5ceosing operations for the production of economical, high-quality, aggregato products and the related operation of a Hot -Mix -Asphalt Concrete (•HKA') Plant on the R. i A. Holthaus Property ("Property") an the need arioeo for eeotern Wright County and vicinity during an average 16-wook conotruction oeaoon for each of the next approximately 25 yearo. The crushing/ocroening and tp(A plants Will operate an average of a weeks and 16 vaeke par year, roopectivoly. operation hours will be 7100 AN to 7:00 PM during the construction coaaon except for Sundays and holidays. Within the first year, prior to full-scale operations, a 10 -ft high earthen berm with barrier screen of trees and scrubs will be installed along the north side of the Property in an attempt to shield from view and ensure that the effects of operational noise will be less than State residential noise standards. There will be less need for erosion controls for the proposed operations because of the high rates of infiltration of water through the gravel -bearing sands beneath the Property. Water from rainfall and snow -melt events mostly evapotranspirates, but a small amount also recharges the groundwater aquifers after a very short period of land - surface flow and/or collection. Recharged water moves from west-northwest to east- northeast beneath the northeast -trending upland ridge. Gravel -bearing, excavation -bank, and imported materials will be processed to prepare highway base and asphalt concrete; secondary products will include granular fill and other products. Anticipated markets and season will determine the volumes of crushed - rock fragments, sand, salvaged and crushed pavement, and minor imported rock -fragments that will be processed and that will be stored on the Property at any time. Rock - materials storage will be mostly within 250 to 500 ft of the HMA plant to be located within the central part of the Property. Individual storage piles will be conical; maximum heights will be 35 ft. Mining will be confined to about a 65 -acre area of the 118 -acre Property. The uamined parts of Property will continue to be used for growing crops. Mining will begin in the southeast part and proceed westerly and northerly; mining is estimated to reach the northern proposed mining limit during about the 25th year of operation. wheel loaders will be used to move excavation -bank and storage -pile materials to the crushing/screening complex, to the HMA plant, and for loading trucks. Initially, the crushing/screening and HMA planta will be sited in the southeastern part of the Property. By about 1999 the plants will be moved down to the excavation near within the southeastern part of the mining area (Phase I). The crushing/screening plant will be moved in concert with the mining; the HMA Plant will remain in the central part of the Property. Asphalt -concrete products will be prepared in the HMA plant from a "feed" of sand, crushed -rock fragments, and minor ailt- and clay -size particles. within the HMA plant, the feed will be dried and coated with heavy petroleum compounds, and conveyed to storage ailos for loading into trucks. An much as 86,000 at of asphalt -construction materials could be produced during a single construction season. Minor quantities of fine particles, recovered from the wet -scrubbing of HMA -plant exhaust, will be carried by, and will nettle out from, the water during flow through the two -pond recirculation system. Each pond will be lined with a 30 mil HDPE or PVC liner. Releases of a very small amount of volatile compounds with some odor potential may result from combustion processes during the production of hoe -mix -asphalt concrete, only during short poriodo of incomplete combustion. Wind data damonatrateo that if odorn result, they will be carried to reaidanceo along CR 106 during lose than IOt of the time, when the prevailing winds blow from the south and southeast at • to 10 knots. water will be needed for the initial fill and to replace evaporative losses in the water -recirculation system and for other operational uses. Groundwater will be pumped from about a 50 -ft depth within a highly productive gravelly -nand aquifer at about 150 gpm for 20 to 30 minutes a day, for up to six days a week for an average of 16 weeks each year, amounting to approximately 500,000 gallons per year. By about the close of Phase III, or about 2009, or sooner depending on the Conditional Use Permit, progressive reclamation will be in and continue until pit closure in about 2020. Reclamation will consist of landforming the excavation banks to 13° or 230 grade slopes and applying approximately 0.5 ft of soil capped by mulch; the surface will than be wetted and planted with alfalfa or MnDOT graon-ooed mixtures. All excavation transition olopoo will be landformed as discussed above, within the first full growing season after cloouro. Truck access to, and haulage from, the Property, will be via a hard -surfaced road that will be built wootorly from Minnesota Highway 25 ("MH 25"); road access will be secured •ith two sets of gates flanked by barbed wire fenoeo, one at the eastern limit of operations and one near MH 25. Only a alight increase in traffic noise over current levels along M4 25 is predicted from truck tral5c from the operations; no truck trafic from the operations is planned on CR 106. All petroleum products used in the operation will be stored in above -ground tank trailers which will be located on bermed tank basins underlain by sand with 70 mil HDPE r PVC liner base. All normal process wastes, except for minor solid waste, chemical oilet and small quantities of laboratory -chemical waste, will be reused on the Property. For example, the fines that settle out in the recirculation ponds and any sandy materials laced with petroleum -product spillage confined within the tank basins will be utilized as HKA-plant feed. ProdW a 50 or Isom wortil a1 1 , for ossa Is foe notkc Over 25 years BBI will mine aggregates and operate a MQ plant within 65 acres in northeastern Wright County with ongoing reclamation and final restoration to farming. Setback, a berm with tree screen, an HIAA -plant -exhaust scrubber, and bermad and lined fuel -spill basin.; will prevent off-site effects. 7. prefect Yee One —119, with Total Project Ates (acres) -65-acre mining area Number of Resid-vial Units Unattached Q CemaacW I teduatrW fsathetlavai I � Aro igen Roa spscd Tate apron hat lsdkats on of tpadRa sash Offiu RMU W lyEt I Other Cee>macW (tpadfTl Mine. 66.8 ncren Odfe�NOW or Length (milet Olt Indaatrhf Hot-mix-asohalt sleet htatio fond A-1 I e Parmfta and Approvals Ratpdnd LIU all mows local, a=. and federal permits. apprmalt, and flailing rupired: Unit of no mmem Tvoe d Aselkntiae Sam Wright County Conditional Use Permit Applying for MPCA-Tanks Section Above ground storage tanks Will apply MPCA-SDS State Dispmoal System Covered by permit for Venturi wet scrubber •MN0690000 wastewater system MPCA Air emianicas Covered by 1611-93-0-1 MPCA-NPDRS Authorization to diacberge W0610000 store water associated with industrial activity and conetructlon excavation A. Land Uta Describe tvnem and nec. pass land we and dmeloprnent on do site and on adjaeem lands. Discuss the conVatibflky of the project with adjacent and nearby lard use; intdinta whe ter arty posmial conflicts badve en*onmestaf nutters. Wemify any potential erwirontrwtml haard due to pan lead use, such u soil cmtnminuion or abandoned smnp tanks. The Property and lands to the west, northwest, east and southeast are now used for farming, and have been for about 70 years Ifig. 1 a 21. Single lot housing and a rural residential development are situated across CA 106 it®edistely to the north and northeast of the Property. The bounding property to the south ccmaists mostly of an unrestored, depleted, nand and gravel pit, which is bald by a sportsman's club. Also, nor -depleted sand and gravel operations occur about 1.7 miles north and about 1.25 miles south of the Property. No environmental hazards have been identified on the Property. 10. Coves Type Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following ower types before and after devdopmem (before and giber totals should be equal): Before After Before After Type t to B Wdands none none Urhanisu bsoto lam _aone none WoodsOForet none none laaduaplap BrmhlGrmlmd 9.0 36.5 lm1oos Surface none none Cropland 109.0 81.3 slaw WescrBW 11. Rsh. WWII% and Eaftocally Smklvo Reocrcn 0. Describe fish and wildlife resources an or near fie sire and discuss how tbcy would be affected by the project. Describe any measures ro be rales to minim >r or avoid adverse impam. The closest distance to the nearest "pond", a type 5 wetland, from the proposed southern mining limit, is 650 ft (fig. 1). No surface -water flows will move from mining/processing operations to the "pond" because of: a 30 -ft lateral separation (setback) will be maintained at the south Property limit; and no groundwater effects will occur because the water table slopes northward (specifically, from west-northwest to east-northeast) (flg. 3). b. Am these any wee -listed esduugned, thrummed. or special -concern species: rare plant cortrmmitics: colonial wamrbird neaft colonies: mdve prairie or other ram habitat: or oder sensitive ecological resources on or near the site? X Yes No If yes, describe rhe resource and bow it would be affecaed by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources was cormdrsted. Describe means= ro be rales M minimize or avoid adverse impacts. The pond described in Ila does on occasion attract trumpeter swans. The RGU is unaware of any swan nesting activity at the pond. 12. Pbtraitd hnaaeb m Wane Ruemce Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic attrntios (dredging, Moll, ttmm diversion. outfall tuucaue, diking, impoundment) of any surface w= (lab. pond. wetland. team. drainage ditch)? ® Yb O No If yes, identify the water resource to be affected and describe: the afterdon. includiM rhe conwmaYion process: volumes of utm IS - or fill material: am afrected: leng[h of stream diversion: water sur6ce area affected: timing and emmu of aucruwiom in want surface elevation: spoils disposal sites: and proposed mhiguion measures w minimize impacts. water -table depths may be slightly (0.35 ft?) leas (the water -table surface may be mounded) within mined areas (fig. a) where the land surface will be lowered an estimated 3S to 30 ft (fig. S). The volume of water reaching the water table may increase because of the leaser amount of intervening material and consequently lees water adhering to the rock and mineral particles during infiltration and surface water flown onto the lowered land surface. (Tse to waote-product recycling and the protection afforded by spillage liners, the Quality of the groundwater will not change. 13. Watts Ona a. Will the pmjea involve the Installation or abandonment of say wells? ® Yes O No For abandoned wells give the locallon and Unique well number. For now wells, or other previously unpermitted wells, give the luxation and purpose of the well and the Unique well number (if known). A well will be drilled and completed to provide water for the wet scrubbing system other minor operational uses (fig. 6). b. Will the pmject require an appropriation of ground or surfkce water Qncludbg dewaming)? X Yrs No If yes. irndiam an source. quardry. duration. purpose of the appropriation. and DNR water appropriation peanut number of arty eziuing appropriation. Discuss the impau of the appropriation on ground water levels. BBI indicated that a 4" (inch) submersible well 1s to be installed. The quantity of ground water appropriation is below the limit that requires a DNR permit. w Will time project require connection to a public water suapply? O Yb ® No y If yes. identify dm uipply. dro DNR waw appropriation permit mumbo of dw supply. and dr quunity to be used. 191 14. Water•rdatd lead Use Woapmmt OLtrkL Does soy part of the project site involve a shomland ranitg dis[riu, a delineated 100 - yen flood plain, or a sure or federally designated wild or scenic river land use dhuW. ❑ Yes M No If yes, identify the district and discuss the umpadblity of the project with the lad use restrictions of the district. 15. Waw Surface Use Will the project dmtpr the mnsI or type of watercraft on any water body? ❑ Yes ® No f yes, indican the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other user or fish and wildlife resources. 16. Soils Approximate depth Cm fees) to: Ground water: minimum 33 ararapa 37 Bed it: minimum 95 "trap —100 Describe the soila an the s tR Oft SCS drsif catlan, U known ISCS tis and will bodog lops mrd an be arschod Major coverage of Baterville loam with o to 2 percent elopes, gaterville sandy loam with 0 to 12 percent elopes, wadena loam with 0 to 2 percent elopes. 17. Irosbo tad SSAmsadon Give the adage to be psded or eaavued and the cubic yards of soil to be mored: sores 64.8 _; cubic yards 104.750 . Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible sods and Identify them on the site map Describe rhe emsion and sedinxma[iw measures to be used during and after construction of the project. Topsoil will be stored in berms (fig. 4) and segregated storage piles prior to initiation of each mining phase. Upon completion of mining and associated operations, beginning about the year 2010 (fig. 5), excavation banks will be landformed to 239 mantimum slopes and the stored soils and mulch will be placed in about a 0.5 -ft -thick bad on the transitional excavation slopoe and alfalfa or MnDOT Grass -surd Mixtures Designations 325, 350, or 175 will be planted down to the gently north -Sloping excavation floor. 18. Weir auesty • groan Wear howl! a. Compact the quantity and quality of site nmoff before and alter the project. Describe methods to be used to mango and/or stat runoff. Runoff would be minimal due to high rates of groundwater infiltration into and through the gravel -bearing sands beneath the property. Minor runoffs will move into the forzmr mine excavation from which the water will move slowly downward to the water table. o. !demi y the muse(s) and receiving water bodies Ibr r mot from the site. Estimate the impact of due romff on the quality of the receiving waren. (j/ rhe runoff may i fat a lake wnsuh 'E4W GrddrUnes' abate uhaher a mmfew budge anatlAr is rrtedd.) No defined or seasonally intermittent streams flow across the property's bcundarieo. 18. WSW OtuOry • Was"WrIa . a. Describe sours, quantities. and mnismition (except for normal domestic sewage) of all unitary and industrial wasmw7n�s produced of treated st the sim. The water recirculation system, from a venturi-ret scrubber unit within the HKA plant, requires an initial volume of about 35,000 gallons and a recirculation rate of about 350 gpm through the two ponds (fig. 6). A proposed Property water well will be used to supply the initial water and makeup water for evaporative losses and other Property noods. Sanitary wastes will be collected in an on-site portable chemical toilet serviced by a subcontractor. b. Describe any waste uatmem methods to be used and give estimates of composition after mantles, or U the project invdses on, site sewage systems, discuss the suitability aide site eonditisro for such systems. Identify sxeivimg wean (irechbhg pad water) and estimate the Impact d the dlschM on tie quality of dee receivhg waters.. ((/dr dlsdmvge essay q�rn o fate caaaL TAW GaidrLlaw' about %Oader a amfew hdgn aunysis it needed.) No wastewater will be discharged on or from the Bite. A two -cell recirculaticn system (fig. 6) will be constructed and used in accord with MPM permit No. MNC1 4900001 clarified water will be recycled. Solids -- mostly silt to clay -size particlen -- will be used as a part of the feed to the I04A plant. c. If wastes will be dbdargrd into s sewer system or pretreatment system. Identify the sysma and discuss the ability of the system to accept dor volume and composition of rtes wase. Identify any improvements which will be necessary, No discharge of wastewater will be made. 20. Ground Wats - Patastw for Coatarnias0aa 33 ft minimum; 37.0 ft maximum in uteined areas; a. Approxinum depth (in feet) to ground wamr: 5 _ minimum; about 6 average below final excavation floor h. Describe way of the following site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes; shallow limestone formatiom/I®rst conditions; soils with high infiltration ram; abarAoned or unused wells. Describe measures to avoid or minimi+. etrvimnnmttml problems due to any of these hazards. Because of the high groundwater infiltration rates of the gravel -bearing sands that will be exposed in the operations area, petroleum storage, fueling, and asphalt -product loading will be on a sand -lined tank basin immediately underlain by a 30 mil PVC or CIDP& liner. No wells are known to have been drilled on the Property. Three piezometers were installed, according to MON regulations, on the Property in January 1992 (fig. 3) . L Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present on the project site and idemi(y mashes to be used to pie veot them from contaminating grand water. See 20b above. A monitoring schedule sbmdd be developed. 21. Solid WM= Rumdous Warns: gtmaps Tab a. Describe the types, amounts, and conrposhlos of solid or hazardous waste to be gauertoed, mc(tdiog animal manures. sludges and ashes. Identify the metbod and location of disposal. For projects Strewing municipal solid waste iadiate if these will be a source separation plan; list type(s) and how the project will be modifted to allow secyclim. The only solid wastes will be small quantities of steel scrap from repair and construction activities and reinforcing bars salvaged from reduction of concrete wastes. Both types of wastes will be stored temporarily on-site and periodically removed by or transported to salvage contractors. Small quantities (1 to 2 quarts) of laboratory chemicals and reagents will be stored in appropriate containers and taken to licensed facilities for recycling or disposal. BBI indicates that only minor emergency repairs will be done at this site and no stockpile of tires or batteries will be on-site. Oil changes and major repairs will be done at the Buffalo facility. b. Indic the number. location. size, and use of any above or below ground unb to be used for storage of petroleum products or otter materials (except water). All storage will. be in portable tank trailers. No. Location Size Use 1 Near HMA Plant 1,000 gal Diesel fuel 1 Near HMA Plant 10,000 gal Burner fuel 2 Near HMA Plant 35,000 gal Asphalt products 22. Trs1Bs Parking spaces added 25 Existirg spaces (if project Imalves expansion) Estimated teal Averspe Daily Traft>t (ADT) generated 6 0 on MN2 S Fulmated maximum peak hour oaf& gerx" (if krnown) and its timing: 20 (lo north, 10 nouth) . Fou each affected mad indicate the ADT and the directional dWrihaion of traffic with and without the project. Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic cor4estiou on the affected mads and describe any trait Improvemerm which will be necessary. Existing (background) trade volumes on study area roadways based upon trade now maps (tbl. I) were obtained from the aright County Traffic Engineer. Truck Tripe from Holthaus Operation Truck tripe to and from the operations will take place upon an asphalt -concrete road built near the southern limit of the Property (fig. 6). This road will intersect M 25 at the aportsmane club entrance road. It is expected that 50% of the Property truck tratdc will be to the north and 50% to the south on MN 25; no truck trade from the Property is expected on CA 106. The maximum number of trucks expected during any given hour is 20 with a more typical volume ranging from 1 to 10 per hour, with an average of S per hour. Thus, the theoretical maximum daily number added to trade on rot 25 may be 20 trucks/hr x 12 hr, or 240 trucks/day. Truck Trade Impacts The operations will result in an increase in trucks on MN 25 of 20 per hour (maximum). It is assumed that a maximum of 20 trucks arrive each hour and 20 trucks 9l# depart each hour, with 10 arrivals and 10 departures in each direction (worst case). Although there may be a measurable increase in the number of trucks, this increase accounts for only a 2 percent increase in tralc to the north and a a percent increase in traffic to the south. This percentage will change during the day, being smaller during periods of heavy trallc and larger during periods of leas traffic. P-xisting and Future Traffic Noise Levels The existing trafic sound levels near the Property were measured at two locations on Monday, 15 September 1994. The monitoring site locations, one at the northwest corner of the proposed operations, just south of CR 106, and the other at the southeast corner of the site near MN 25, are shown in figure 7. The higher levels along MN 25 as compared to CR 106 reflect both higher traffic volumes and higher speeds. Based upon estimated daily traffic volumes (tbl. I), estimates of traffic noise using the STAMINA 2.0 highway noise prediction model were made for MN 25 (MN 25 is the only area roadway that will experience an increase in truck trafdc because of the proposed operations). It is estimated that a 1 dBA increase in sound level is expected along MN 25 due to trucks travelling to and from the Property. A 3 d8A increase is required to make a clearly detectable difference. OPERATIONAL NOISE Equipment Sound Levels Sound Measurement Program Sound -level measurements were made at the Buffalo Bituminous' Greenfield gravel mining and processing operation on 20 August 1993 to establish a database of mining and processing equipment sound levels for estimating the potential for noise impacts from Property operations (tbl. IV). The equipment or very similar equipment will be used for the Property operations and therefore represents the type and level of noise that can be expected. Relative location of the measurement sites and the equipment being measured are listed in table II. Measurements were made using a RION NA -29 real time octave band analyzer, which allowed for data storage and later retrieval by computer. Results of Equipment Sound Level Measurement Program These data were read into a computer, plotted, analysed, and interpreted to develop realistic average levels for use in sound prediction modelling. where noise from other equipment woo included in a specific reading, this was either corrected or omitted from further analysis. Where possible, average sound levels by direction were determined. The results of the analysis are presented below. The assumed oourco sound levels based upon the above analysis are shown in figure 6. The crusher has significant high frequency componcato; the dryer has generally uniform sound levels across all frequencies. Frequency information is important in the modelling of sound sources because the attenuation through the air, by ground cover, and by barriers (natural or man-mada) is highly frequency -dependent. The principal noise sources expected at the Property are the crusher, the generator and RMA plant, and to a lesser extent, the doter under load. An empty truck is estimated to be 7 dBA quieter than a loaded truck (fig. 6). Proposed Operations and Noise Control Berms It is anticipated that mining will be carried out in five phases (fig. 4) during the lifetime of the Property. The first -phase mining will be within the southeastern part ofthe property; subsequent phases will be progressively closer to CR 106. The mining rill generally rotate about a la1A plant site within the east -central part of the Property (fig. 6). Prior to Phase I operations a 10' high earthen bens will be constructed just south of CR 106 with materials uncovered during preliminary stripping to provide additional noise shielding from mining and processing operations for residences near and north of CR 106; a berm will also extend southward about 1.200 ft along the east Property boundary (fig. 4). The north berm, with a vegetative screen, will help to provide a visual barrier for the residences north of CR 106 (fig. 9 L 10). The trees will consist of 100 spaded trees, 8 to 10 feet high; 40% bare root trees, 6 to 8 feet high; 25t seedlings; and 25% replanted trees, 18 to 24 inches in height. During Phase I (fig. 4), the equipment (generator, crushing and screening equipment, dryer, and dozer) will operate on the land surface, but during about the 4th year the equipment will be moved onto the excavation floor, where the approximately 30 -ft high excavation walls will provide additional noise shielding. During the other Phases, the HKA plant and associated equipment will remain at approximately the same location. Sensitive Receptor Sites To estimate the projected noise from on-site operations a representative number of residences adjacent to the site were selected for analysis. These receptor sites (seven residences and Cheloey Farms) are depicted in figure 7. Projected Noise Levels The loudest of the noise sources have been assumed to be operated simultaneously and continuously during the day, providing a measure for comparison with the daytime Minnesota Noise Standard L50 of 60 dRA (the level not to be exceeded for 30 minutes of an hour)(tbl. III). During Phase I the generator, crusher and screen, dryer, and dozer have been assumed to operate simultaneously first on the surface and then in about 4 years on the floor of the excavation. The former represents the worst-case operational noise level. Stripping operations to obtain berm material will be on the southeastern part of the Property. Construction of the berm will entail some noise for a brief period of time. Sound levels are estimated for two phases of the operations, Phase I and Phase V. The effect of noise shielding from the berm and the excavation bank during projected land -surface and mine -floor operations of Phase I are shown on figure 11. During the initial four years of land -surface operations noise levels would be below ambient L50 Minnesota noise standards (tbl. III) with highest estimated level of about 55 deA at receptor e. During the remainder of Phase I operations the noise levels would vary from 36 to 38 dBA -- well below the Minnesota noise standards. During a short period of time when the cruohing/screening plant is operating at or near the land surface during Phase V, the projected L50 noise level would be a maximum of about 58 dBA at receptor 8 and as low as 47 dBA at receptor site 7 (fig. 12). However, during moat of Phase V noise levels will be loco than 38 dBA at receptor cite 2 and as low as 36 dBA at receptor site 6. 23. vddeWd" air musioes provide an mimue of the effect of the project's traffic gerteratim on air goaliry, inc(udlne cefbae morwaide levels. Distant the effect of mffic impfvvemems or odter mitigation rnauun an air gtnliry ittv". (1/W pAvea lawfver 500 or mom panting spacer. croatuh •F.4W CkddrUaa- abom athahn a detdled dr quafiry avosit 11 needed.) No meaourable impact is anticipated. 24. StatlmaV soars air s pinion VIII dw project involve ury endo ury sources of air emlssiom (auth u boiler or exhautt stacb)t Eyes ONO If yes, describe the sources. quamida. and composition of the a minion: the pfo, W air polhalon coenol devices: the giamh(o and composition of the ctniniofn afirr treatment: and the efforts on air quallry. Hot -mix -asphalt -concrete Plant: Barber Greene DN -71 Drum mixer. Pollution control device: Model CV.80 wet scrubber. emissions testing: after treatment tested per U.S. EPA methods 1-5, CPS Title 40, Pt. 60, Append. A. Renultas Plant will meet standard of leas than 0.4 g/DSCV, stark Dow will be approximately 28,000 DSCFM with 6.3% COs, 13.4. 0, 80.3% N. Ak 25, wll dx project generate dust, odors, or noise during construction an&or opcncioo7 M lb ❑ No If yes, describe the sources, characmristia, duration, and quantities of intensity, and any proposed m umtres to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify the locations of sensitive receptors in the vicinity and estimate the bpaco on tbcse receptors. ')UST CONTROL For dust control measures refer to sections on *Fugitive Emissions from Operation* and "Emission Controls* discussed below. AIR EMISSIONS Air Emissions Permit BBI currently has a MPCA Permit for air emissions (no. 1111-93-6-1) for the operation of a HMA plant and its associated air pollution control equipment. This permit became effective in June 1993 and expires in January 1998. The permit covers both a baghouse dust collector and a wet scrubber for the collection of dust from hot mix processing. Fuel consumption for a dryer is limited to 150,000 gallons per month based upon a 12 month rolling average. Sulfur content of the fuel is not to exceed 0.5 percent by design weight. Limitations are also placed on the chemical content and characteristics of petroleum -derived used oil. Monthly operating hours are limited to 233 hours. Monthly production is limited to 110;000 at. Recycled asphalt -concrete pavement may also be used in the facility subject to conditions of the permit. At least 10 days notification of the relocation of the EM plant to another location is required under the permit. Emissions From Equipment Emissions from equipment, as noted in the permit, include the drum drier fired by liquid or gaseous fuel with an associated baghouse or wet scrubber for collection of Lite particles. Emissions from the diesel generator are also covered by the permit. The permit requires BBI to comply with State and Federal ambient air Quality standards. Emissions of particulate matter are limited to 0.01 grains per dry standard cubic foot (DSCF) or 90 milligrams per dry etendard cubic meter (DSCM). Fugitive Emiooionn From Operations Fugitive scurcon covered by the permit include aggregate -storage piles, wheel loadero to carry aggregato to feed hoppers, belt conveyor from the food hoppers to the drum drier, elevator to storage bins, weight hopper, pugmill, surge hopper, truck ocale, liquid -fuel -storage tanks, asphalt -storage tanks, and asphalt -tank heaters. Emiocion Controls Air -pollution -control equipment must be operated at all times during hot -mix processing. Specific eo itiono to be met by the wet scrubber are contained in the permit. During operation of the HKA plant 881 will use a venturi wet -scrubber for the collection of particulate matter, recirculating 350 gallona per minute of water from a two -cell closed and sealed pond system. Monitoring of water now through the wet scrubber will take place at all times the plant ie in operation. To control fugitive emiooicno, BBI is required to take all measures as necessary to prevent avoidable amounto of particulate matter from becoming airborne from sources of fugitive emissions, including, but not limited to access roads, aggregate stockpiles and materials -handling operations. Measures •hall include, but are not limited to, the application of water or other approved dust suppressants. (The une of oil so a dust euppreeeant is prohibited in accordance with Minnesota Statutes.) With the above emission control measures, the gravel sining operation will comply with the emission requirements of the MPCA as contained in MPCA Permit and will have minimum air duality impacts on neighbors. ODORS Source of odors The major source of odors from the HMA plant is polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PARS), which are volatile compounds associated with the combustion process and the production of hot -mix -asphaltic concrete. Typical PAHs associated with a hot mix facility are benzopyrene and napthalene. These are generally products of incomplete combustion in the flame and when the liquid asphalt binder is mixed with hot aggregate. Normally, gases from the mixing chamber pass through the burner flame, which consumes most of the hydrocarbons. Some release of volatile compounds can also occur when mix is transferred from the plant to vehicles for delivery. Air emission permits do not generally require any additional controls of these emissions. Area Meteorology Transmission of odors from the asphalt plant to receptor sites depends upon the speed and direction of local winds. Hight years of hourly wind data collected by the National Weather Service at the St. Cloud Airport, about 22 miles from the Plant site, were used to estimate wind conditions that will likely occur on and near the Property. Potential for Odor Impacts Any odors released from the HMA Plant would most likely be detected when wind speeds are between 4 and 10 knots. At higher wind speeds there is considerable mixing; during calm and very low wind apcods any odor remains near the HMA plant. Figure 13 depicts the percentage of the time during the period of plant operation (May through October) that winds ranging from 4 to 10 knots blow towards 16 directions. The most susceptible receptor sites (sites 1, 2, and 3, fig. 13) will experience winds at wind speeds of a to 10 knots from the HMA plant site generally leas than 10% of the time; the other residential receptors will experience these winds leas than 6% of the time; the commercial receptor site to the southeast will experience these winds leas than 9% of the time. If odors are emitted when winds range between a and 10 knots, odors may be experienced at downwind receptors. Odor Controls Complete combustion and use of equipment controls can minimize the escape of PAHs to the atmosphere. There may, however, be some conditions under which some odor might be detected. This is, however, expected to occur only a very small percentage of the time. The HMA plant will operate for about 16 weeks each construction aeadorl, during which adverse wind conditions would occur less than low of the time. odors will be perceivable only when odor emissions occur during that 10% of that time. 26. Are any of the fbllowing msowm an or In pmxlmity to the slm: a. amheological, hinarlad. or archimtanal nuourcol O Nee 0 No b. prime or unique f><mdands7 0 % ® No R des4mawd part, recmulao arnr, or W10 0 Yea 0 No d. scenic v(aan and vism7 0 Yb ® No a. odner unique MIOU C37 0 Yes ® No If any lams am answaed %, desate dw msoume and Idemlfy any impscm on the reamute due m due project. DesafEe arty measures m be Wma w mWmise or said advenae impacts. 27. Will Me pmjea crew advem visual Impaem7 (Eran(pW Lack dr: Ilan fmas Gnaw (l kj: Ulks tirlbfi G %G n wu amm. and Iargr risius je mrvi from Cooling masa ar C AMW tmcks.) m % O No A water vapor plume from the dryer discharge stack will be visible intermittently depending on local atmospheric conditions. 10 28. Coapatilaty uw(tb plans Is the project subject to an adopted low comprehensive land se plan or any other applicable land use, water, or resource mmagenxnc plan of an local, regional. state, or federal aged ® Yes 0 No If yes, identify the applicable plar(s), discus the compatibility of die project with the provisions of the plan(s), and explain how any conflicts between the project and the plan(t) will be resolved. If no. votin. Project site is designated as Agricultural, within which mining, sand and gravel extraction is a Conditional Use. Site areae not actively mined will continue to be farmed. After close of operations the excavation floor land will be returned to farming. A HKA plant associated with sand and gravel mining is a conditional use in an agricultural zone pursuant to Wright County Zoning Ordinance 717.5 Paragraph ♦. 29. Inpad an lahnment a and Pdk Swvlcn will new or expanded utilities. roads, otber itdtauncture. or public services be required to serve the proem? ❑ Ws m No If yes, describe w new at additional inhasattxtu rdurvices weeded. (Any i4ioorumve that is o 'connected action' wide retpea to the project must lk assessed in this E41V see TAW Guidelines' for details.) 30. Rd" caaelawa mi - 4 Aro htum stage of this dadopmem plumed or likely! 0 Yes M No If yes. briefly describe future stages. their timing, and plans for environmental review. b. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? O Us ® No If yes. briefly describe the put drmlopmmt. is dming, and any pan etrvimnn=W review. G Is other development asuicigted on 4axm lands or ml ooT ❑ lb M No If yes. briefly describe the developmei and its relationship to the prsem project. d. If a, Is. or c were maned Ib, discuss any cumulative mvimmnemal impacts restating ham this project and the other development. 31. of w potamw Ea dream Iswu If dee pmjea may came any adverse eavirormenal Impacts which were oot addressed by (tans 1 to 28, identify dem here. along with any proposed mitigation. No other environmental impacts are anticipated. A Sonar r m uses Mis union need eat eco croi y*fcd (f tba E1W it being done for ilS ttWing, hweett address r inw Isaac in dw drgn ScapM1 Decision donownt wfnich must accorgpmny At E(N() Un any irrpacts and issues idemihed above that may require harsher inv st4nion beft). the project is commenced. Discus, Am alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for fuse (mpeea and issues. InehdinO those that have been or may be ordered a pennh conditions. Other impacts and issues may arise during the hearing and comment process. Mitigative measures are dioauooed throughout, including noise -control plana, vegetation for vioual screening, and air -pollution -control equipment. CERTIFl naNs 9r TAE RGU ftp 3 cefffeatims n wt be ripped for EOB eavience of the EAW for pubfrrefion of notice m the O Monhoil L I herebythe,�nfbmuaigr) com0ned in this doh is actuate std cmplem m the ben of my bowledgc. Signsnte din r, a I-V.— B. I hereby certify that the prof " described in this paw is the cmiplem project and there am no other projects, project tugs, or project components, ,her do thma described in this drxmnesn, which ate relamd to the project as 'conrecsrA actions' or 'phased actions,' i s deflrcd, aspeafkel atMinn.rales, 4410.02M. W* 9b and sump. 60. Signature 4'E__ A_ G I hereby ry t co or the c pleud RAW am Wq sem to all polra an do official EQe PAW dluribalas lin. This e+.ion.�-, "FEMMIC88 12 9 9 0 Figures (Appendix AI rim Figure 1. project location may A2 Figure 2. Ownership map of Monticello Township, Wright County, Minnesota A3 Figure 3. Mater -table surface, July -August, 1994, R. i A. Holthaus property, Monticello Township, Wright County, Minnesota A4 Figure 4. Extent of proposed excavation at 5 -year intervals, R. & A. Holthaus property, Monticello Township, Wright County, Minnesota AS Figure S. Topographic map of proposed reclaimed land surface, R. i A. Holthaus property, Monticello Township, Minnesota _ A6 Figure 6. proposed location of processing equipment, materials storage, fuel storage, and water recycling system at midpoint of operational life, R. i A. Holthaus property, Monticello Township, Wright County, Minnesota . . . . A7 Figure 7. Site locations of background noise level monitoring As p Figure S. Overall noioe levels for mining and processing equipment A9 Figure 9. vertical north -trending eection of proposed northern limit of sand and gravel operation in about 2020, R. i. A. Holthauo property, Monticello Township, Wright County, Minnesota A30 Figure 10. Detailed vertical section of proposed north berm and screening vegetation in about 1006, R_ i A. Holthaun property. Monticello Township, Wright County, Minnesota All Figure 11. Predicted noise levels, phase I opera tions . . . . . Al2 Figure 12. Predicted noise levels, Phase V operations . . . . . All Figure 17. Mind speeds of 4 to 10 knots by direction during 6 - month plant operating season . . . . . . . . . . . . A14 i Tables (Appendix B) Daae Table I Existing daily tramc on study area roadways B1 Table II Monitored traBc sound levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . B2 Table III Minnesota noise standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B2 Table IV Measurement sites - Buffalo Bituminous equipment . . . BD 16 , 1 P Figures (Appendix A) - fJ , • 4 , ' ta23w A2 7. L a t 17 utba jrI _•rte.' ! t �r �--,'�' i = '�''� _ - �l1',� �i ,,,? . Iii !'t►�•jj ` ;!R`�/ -'1 •.'r• —71 tet, •.Jill • } j �• - ' -, 1��!� FL 86 _ Its X pro On ......ti .. .-..:;;•� ,...=:'i',.'.�4a.� =..�fJr �/tf' i(�P� (ti, 11 `:'' r:t \ 0 1tp0 2m MEET Qt>t -�•-• Figura t. Flr000 batton ffp ID =1=19 Asscxlat**. Inc. �tyN4 ma0 � f' 6�ro 2 r .4 Aa A K NooB c� 40 ►y' 00 00 ,._. ..� .�. ... ... ... .�. ..� Iw wl cxtr w �w ►rrr dM dft: 4� -A IpU )Ok fill ,.. dull•. �v1� ,� , --` Ilw Lzi t MINI z. Ili, ,•.''"•' ',• r.:�• �� ' ' / "" •' VIII � j J/ �/ :.; �� j ;' ..,.. ...� � ew Q o.errw rrr�����pprpp� L • r rye rrv=� \reiyrrirep.4.� Fbm6' 11.`7♦, jlioryrrpa+�Pw4�Yiw�O Ynp w.Mt�. now Imo.. .� ..... -- -A7 I (v'i�r�' ��ee. Modhaw property r / amb ,ow r Fom&plop---bmdeonnoalWRNS" o. We .aonp. rd0ap.b. Ymac.re to N a fir. tL i w HOMWA woo aiwo -,oma► MAO O ' ` .CR�� ~�04s-0" tM9lots _...., ��- ate• �a �s Ill�w �. I rM ►r _1 Ta�ary� 1V r www+�ral.a �• 0. "woo .'fbndPnpowlnoetlwftld a �'PMJ'. �T yy� Cants. ►0.yy -All I_ --s' _I Figum i O. C omm va+4eO1 w ,I . d D noM Oam and yaw" 10 npOtatlon In Oban 2004. R. 8 A. MoMOuO PM" MWfto o tbMrruhp we#d Cow tri Mw—m R.K. Hoagbup Anodatw cwmavaomwm r,91A� ._._ Figure 11 70- as - PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS PHASE I OPERATIONS 1 2 9 4 5 0 7 6 I ® SURFACE -10' BERM W MINE FW(NI.10- BERM -Al2 PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS PHASE V OPERATIONS 1'0— Elm w 4 e RECEPTOR SRES ® SURFACE -10' BERM =MINE FLOOR -10' BERM ,A13 Iqce--� O ffiwwlh�w iwmwommimm Wjmj4pmmftd4j3jobjWbV'- I Tables (Appendix B) is 9 TABLE II MONITORED TRAFFIC SOUND LEVELS MONITORING SITE LSO ldBAl L10 ldBAl CR 106 48 56 TH 23 59 68 NO CA STANDARD 60 65 TABLE M MaNNESOTA NOISE STANDARDS call levels shown to dBA For one howl Dav (0700-2200) Nicht (2200-0700) Cateltory LSO LIO LSO LIO I (reaidem Q 60 65 50 33 2(0cumnerdaQ 63 70 63 70 3 (mdusbW) 75 1 90 75 80 TABLE I I EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC ON STUDY AREA ROADWAYS ROADWAY LOCATION AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC TH 25 North of CR 106 16,100 1 TH 23 South of CR 106 10,100 CR 106 Wet of TH 25 825 CR 106 Wet of re idrncal develoorr» 670 CR 106 Vlemcv of lake road 570 TABLE II MONITORED TRAFFIC SOUND LEVELS MONITORING SITE LSO ldBAl L10 ldBAl CR 106 48 56 TH 23 59 68 NO CA STANDARD 60 65 TABLE M MaNNESOTA NOISE STANDARDS call levels shown to dBA For one howl Dav (0700-2200) Nicht (2200-0700) Cateltory LSO LIO LSO LIO I (reaidem Q 60 65 50 33 2(0cumnerdaQ 63 70 63 70 3 (mdusbW) 75 1 90 75 80 TABLE TV %IEA.hURE,,NILNI Jl'IIi h - BUF'FALU BIT UMINOub EQUIPMLN 1 (ill readings tae 10 second Leq unless noted as instantaneous reading) SITE EQUIPMENT DIST (feet) LOCATION REMARKS 1 Dner acneratoroniv 30 west 2 Drier ¢mentor only 30 north 3 Dn=eenemwroNv 100 north 3 Drier eencrator only 30 north Don 42 3 Dnrr g•n•r stor only 30 east idbng loader 6 Derr generator only 30 east int. tcrdmR 7 Derr generator only 30 west Dup 01 8 From end fonder 50 side order fhll load 9 From end loader 30 side Same cam as 08 IO drier oum oomDla 30 east w•/o Cnnnu +,61st 1 I dryer Clam come a 30 east w•h++mmms w!o 6dt 12 dmr Want I -Cat 50 east w/cuxrmuns*belt 13 dntt Dlanl oomokx 30 can Du 012 14 drier Dlam CpmOSQ 30 west w/tummms+beh IS dmDL= mmolces 50 west DpHls 16 dntt Clam aomlen 100 west w/wmmms4bett 17 deer plant oomolat 100 west Dp 016 18 dr%vr dant cam lac 100 cast w/a®ms w/o beft 19 drift plant mrnoloc 100 ase w/a nunus"beh 20 an* 30 side In pamng (loaded) 21 truck 50 side 2nd ==R (loaded) 22 archer complex 30 south 23 crusher conlex m 30 south Duo 0022 23 crusher eamolex so souia tare 021 25 aus6er onmplcr SO sank bum 022 26 Crusher epm06 30 south Dw 0021 21 crusher complex 100 soma 28 crm6er complex 160 south DDuupp 027 29 crusher camolct 100 sesta wu6 dozer nearby 30 aus6er comnlex- 31 crusher komdex 30 west Duo 0030 32 crusher complex 1 d wrest 33 emslier complex 100 west Dun 0032 3i erm6er complex A north 35 Cms6er complex Sb nortl Duo 04 35 enn6er complex 3b easi 37 cnAer Como6 36 cosi wnh dozer nearby 3A Jzer 50 mde fmdjnfls 19 dozer6 side Sin a cord as 00u ab dour 36 side ';smut nom as iii iI cros&er nom tcx 33 north 11 Crusher comotex 33 wen 23' west of enwme i3 Crusher Complex 266 west u Crusher complex 266 west pug r+a} 45 drier wenemror only IN an df r mit (oder iX new mck 36 side F.m send mss (em7yI i7 new truck 36 side low speed pus (emmyI -Ca TABLE IV MFASUREME:N"F SI1'Eb - BUFFALO BI'TURINUUS EQU1P,%ILN'I (all readings are 10 second Leq unless noted as instantaneous reading) SITE EQUIPMENT DIST (feet) LOCATION REMARKS 1 Diva generator only SO was 2 Drver wa alur orh SO north 3 Dryer ¢enerator only 100 north S Dma generator only 30 north Duo 02 S Dr%vr generator only 30 cast idling loader 6 Drva generator only 30 east inet reading 7 Diva generator only SO west DUD 01 8 From end loader s0 aide under 11tH load 9 From end Bader so tide Same gond as 09 10 dryer DLam W=DkX 30 east w/o cumnamsAxIt 1 l drys olam covoD6 SO cast w/cvmmins w%o bdt 12 dryer plant como6t 50 east w/comrnms+bcit 13 drva banns corankm 50 east D•g 012 li &m nkat oomD6 30 west w/cumminsrbelt 15 drva plant D nvTccx SO wen Dqp 014 16 irm pramWmDFe 100 west w/a®mint"tch 17 dryer @lout ontagm 100 west Dp M 16 18 dryer Dent =nnFax 100 east w/c mim w/o beh 19 drncr mlutt comafok 100 east w/mmmmT*beh 20 tuck SO side Istpacdnafloa"I 21 truck 50 side 2nd rnstane (leadedI 22 crasher complex 30 south 23 cnssber complex so Muth Dun a22 24 cnsslter complex 30 south bum 022 25 cNsM oomolex 50 south 1)w a22 f6 crasher oonTWex 30 surth Duo 022 f7 cnaher co=lex foo Mouth 28 crushca wmulex Iud mutt 027 29 masher cotmDlex 100 soma with rimer nnrM Su crusher C,0=6 50 west - 31 enssha mmolex 50 west Duo 030 12 mashes oo=6 100 west 13 cnwwr complex 100 west Duo 032 34 cm&Fxr complex 50 north 33 masher complex 30 torah Duo a34 36 rnuher eomolex 3o c sf 79 crusher DOM06 SO can with dozy nearby A dozer 30 tide ms% readinax % dozer 30 ode Same cord as Y11 ib dozer 50 sfde am cord as alai i 1 aUsM camDlex 2 s north 42 cnssrw complex 23 sora 25' wen of enone 43 rnssFmcomDlex 200 west ai erusim comolex 200 west Dnp a/j as diver generator only 100 cut kdlina (coder Z6 new bock 36 side Fu th Sneed oam Iemutyl 41 new ma 50 side low weed Dass (acro l Council Agenda - 4/24/95 Fonsidgradpn of modthing Jhe mileage reimbursement rate for Council and emolovees. (R.W.) A. REFERENCETA lD BACKGROUND: Currently, City employees and Council Members who are required to use their own vehicles for transportation purposes on City business are reimbursed at Lim rate of .28 per mile. This rate was established in 1993 and before that had been established at .25 per mile since 1982. Currently the IRS allows .30 per mile as the standard deduction amount for income tax purposes, and it is suggested that the City consider increasing mileage allowance for employees at the same rate the IRS allows annually. While I realize that the last increase to .28 per mile only occurred two years ago, it may be easier for the City Council to make the adjustments to coincide with the IRS allowance in order to simplify the process in the future. It should be noted that the IRS does calwlate the current cost of operating a vehicle including vehicle cost, gas and oil, maintenance and insurance in determining the amount they feel it costs to operate a car. Making adjustments more frequently as determined by the IRS regulations may be better than waiting too long and necessitating a large jump at one time. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Increase the mileage allowance for City employee and Council Member travel reimbursement to .30 per mile to correspond with the IRS allowance. 2. Increase the present .28 allowance to some other amount to be established by the Council. 3. Do not change the present .28 amount. ,t %) C �L C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 41'r"A F� To simplify the process of establishing a reimbursement rate, it is suggested that the Council simply establish the same rate annually that is allowed by the IRS, which is .30 per mile for the year 1995. This is the procedure that is commonly used by other jurisdictions, as it is a method of establishing a rate by using the research already completed by the IRS to establish the appropriate amount None. 32 Council Agenda - 4/24/95 21. ConsideriLtion of an ordinance amendment adootine the 1994 Building Code. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider adopting the 1994 Minnesota State Building Code. For the past six years, we have been using the 1988 Minnesota State Building Code. In reviewing the changes in the existing building code section of our ordinance versus the proposed amendment, most of the changes are in the verbage or terminology that is used in referencing the State Building Code to current Minnesota Statutes. With the proposed adoption of the 1994 Minnesota State Building Code, the fee schedule for the 1994 versus the 1988 Minnesota State Building Code is higher, however, at this time by previous Council action, we will be staying with the 1988 Building Code fee schedule. If adjustments were to be made to the fee schedule, this would be brought back to the City Council for their approval at a later date. Approve adoption of the 1994 Minnesota State Building Code. 2. Deny adoption of the 1994 Minnesota State Building Code. Lt 7IYAV ai d �C�Zs 0-9.310. 0 With the proposed changes as submitted to the building code section of the ordinance brings us up to speed with the current Minnesota State Building Code used in the state of Minnesota by other building code communities. The 1994 Building Code fee schedule is not proposed to be adopted at this time. We will be utilizing the 1988 Building Code fee schedule per previous Council approval for all building permits issued in 1995. Copy of the existing building code section of the ordinance; Copy of the proposed 1994 Building Code update to the ordinance. 33 cc ROPr ORDINA)UCE CHAPTER 1 BUILDING CODE SECTION: 4-1-1: Intent and Purpose 4-1-2: Building Code 4-1-3: Organization and Enforcement 4-1-4: Permits, Inspections and Fees 4-1-5: Fire Zone Districts 4-1-6: Violations and Penalties 4-1-7: Effective Date of Ordinance 4-1-1: INTENT AND PURPOSE: An ordinance adopting the Minnesota Building Code; providing for its administration and enforcement: regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, moving, removal, demolition, conversion, occupancy, equipment, use, height, area, and maintenance of all buildings and/or structures in the city of Monticello; providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees. 4-1-2: BUILDING CODE: The Minnesota State Building Code, one cpv af which is on file in the office of the City Administrator, has been adopted by Minnesota Statutes 16.851 (1977) as a uniform building code applicable throughout the state. Such code, its supplements, amendments, additions, addenda, alterations, subtractions, and revisions as currently adopted and which may in the future be adopted and Incorporated as part of the code, is hereby confirmed as the building code of the City of Monticello and incorporated in this ordinance as completely as if set out in full. The admlialatrative authority for the City of Monticello as specified in 4-1-3 of this code shall maintain on file in his/her office a record of all adopted supplements, amendments, etc., and shall utilize in the enforcement of the building code as if set out in full in this section. (A) The 1988 Edition of the State Building Code, with appendixes, adopts by reference the following codes: I. Minnesota Rules, Part 1300 - Code Administration. 2. Minnesota Rules, Part 1301 - Certification and Continuing Education of Building Officials. 3. Minnesota Rules, Part 1302 - Building Construction and Stato Agency Construction Rules. 4. Minnesota Rules, Part 1305 - Adoption of the 1988 Uniform Building Code by roforence. The 1987 ANSI -A-17.1 Code for elevators and related devices is an anondment to Chapter 51 of the UBC and no longer found in SBC Rules 1320. MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE IV/Chpt 1/P a) Required Provisions --UBC Appendix, Chapter 35, Sound Transmission Control. 5. Minnesoa Rules, Part 1315 - Electrical Code. 6. Minnesota Rules, Part 1325 - Solar Energy Systems. 7. Minnesota Rules, Part 1330 - Technical Requirements for Fallout Shelters. 8. Minnesota Rules, Part 1335 - Flood -Proofing Regulations (when required). 9. Minnesota Rules, Part 1340 - Facilities for the Handicapped. 10. Minnesota Rules, Part 1346 - Minnesota Uniform Mechanical Code, 1990 Edition. il. Minnesota Rules, Part 1350 - Manufactured Home Rules. 12. Minnesota Rules, Part 1355 - Plumbing Code - Administrative Rule 4715. 13. Minnesota Rules, Part 1360 - Prefabricated Structures. 14. Minnesota Rules, Part 1365 - Variation of Snow Loads. 15. Minnesota Rules, Part 1370 - Model Energy Code - Administrative Rule 7670. 16. Minnesota Rules, Part 7510.3100-7510.3280 - Adoption of the 1988 Uniform Fire Code by reference. (6/22/81, 4103) (1/10/94, 1245) 4-1-3: ORGANIZATION AND ENFORCEMENT: The organization of the Building Department and enforcement of the code shall be conducted within the guidelines established by Chapter 2 of the Uniform Building Code, 1982 Edition. The code shall be enforced within the incorporated limits of the city of Monticello, and any extra- territorial limits shall be any area, incorporated or unincorporated, designated under a Joint Powers Agreement entered into by the City of Monticello and any other township/village/city/county. The Building Department shall be the Building Code Department of the City of Monticello. The administrative authority shall be a State Certified Class II "Building Official" so designated by the appointing authority. The appointing authority shall be the City Council of the City of Monticello. MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE IV/Chpt 1/ go ,;?l6 f 4-1-4: PERMITS, INSPECTIONS AND FEES: (A) The issuance of permits, conduction of inspections, and collections of fees shall be established by the City Council. (7/13/81, #104) (B) Surcharge: In addition to the permit fee required by item A above, the applicant shall pay a surcharge. The surcharge computation is based on the value of construction. Surcharge equals .0005 of the total value of conotruction or 50 cents, whichever is greater. (7/13/81, #104) 4-1-5: FIRE ZONE DISTRICTS: All areas within the city of Monticello shall be in Fire Zone #3. 4-1-6: VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES: The penalty described in the Uniform Building Code, 1979 Edition, Section 205 as amended, shall be in keeping with Minnesota Statutes 609.031, which provides for a maximum fine of $500 or imprisonment for 90 days, or both. 4-1-7: EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE: The effective date of this ordinance shall be upon publication. (5/29/84, #135) MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE IV/Chet 1/Pago 3 ?WOWED OAWAAKAX45 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MWNESOTA, HEREBY ORDAINS THAT TITLE 4, CHAPTER 1, OF THE MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO BUILDING CODE BE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWING: CHAPTER 1 BUILDING CODE SECTION: 4-1-1: Intent and Purpose 4-1-2: Building Code 4-1.3: Application, Administration, and Enforcement 4-1.4: Permits and Fees 4-1.6: Fire Zone Districts 4-1-6: Violations and Penalties 4-1-7: Effective Date of Ordinance 4-1-1: INTENT AND PURPOSE: An ordinance adopting the Minnesota State Building Code. This ordinance provides for the application, administration, and enforcement of the Minnesota State Building Code by regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, moving, removal, demolition, conversion, occupancy, equipment, use, height, area, and maintenance of all buildings and/or structures in the city of Monticello; provides for the issuance of permits and collection of fees thereof; provides penalties for violation thereof; repeals all ordinances and parts of ordinances that conflict therewith. 4-1.2: BUILDING CODE: The Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1613.68 to 1613.76, is hereby adopted as the building code for this jurisdiction. Such code, its supplements, amendments, additions, addenda, alterations, subtractions, and revisions as currently adopted and which may in the fhture be adopted and incorporated as part of the code, is hereby confirmed as the building code of the City of Monticello and hereby incorporated in this ordinance as if Ailly set out herein. (A) The Minnesota State Building Code includes the following chapters of Minnesota Rules: r Alb Ordinance Amendment No. Page 2 1. 1300 Minnesota Building Code 2. 1301 Building Official Certification 3. 1302 State Building Construction Approvals 4. 1305 Adoption of the 1994 Uniform Building Code, including Appendix Chapters: a. 3, Division I, Detention and Correctional Facilities b. 12, Division II, Sound Transmission Control C. 29, Minimum Plumbing Fixtures 5. 1307 Elevators and Related Devices 6. 1315 Adoption of the 1993 National Electrical Code 7. 1325 Sohn Energy Systems 8. 1330 Fallout Shelters 9. 1335 Floodproofing Regulations 10. 1340 Facilities for the Handicapped 11. 1348 Adoption of the 1991 Uniform Mechanical Code 12. 1350 Manufactured Homes 13. 1360 Prefabricated Buildings 14. 1386 Snow Loads 16. 1370 Storm Shelters 16. 4715 Minnesota Plumbing Code 17. 7670 Minnesota Energy Code 18. Adoption of the 1991 Uniform Fire Code by reference. (B) The City of Monticello may adopt by reference any or all of the following optional appendix chapters of the 1994 Uniform Building Code as authorized by Minnesota rule part 1305.0020 subpart 2; 3, Division III, 1992 One and Two Family Dwelling Code; 15, Reroofing; 19, Exposed Residential Concrete; 31, Division 11, Membrane Structures; 33, Excavation and Grading. The following optional appendix chapters of the 1994 Uniform Building Code are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for this municipality. Chapter 15, Reroofing (C) The City of Monticello may adopt by reference any or all of the following optional chapters of Minnesota rule: 1306, Special Fire Protection Systeme with option 8 (Group M, 8, or F occupancies with 2,000 or more gross square feet) or 8a (Group M, S, or F occupandes with 6,000 or more gibes square feet); 1310, Building Security; 1335, Floodproofing regulations parts 1335.0600 to 1335.1200, Ordinance Amendment No. Page 3 4-1-3: APPLICATION, ADMINISTRATION, AND ENFORCEMENT: The code shall be enforced within the incorporated limits of the city of Monticello, and any extra -territorial limits permitted by Minnesota Statute 16B.62, subdivision 1, shall be any area, incorporated or unincorporated, designated under a Joiut Powers Agnuwent entered into by the City of Monticello and any other township/village%sty/ommty. The code enforcement department of the City of Monticello is called the Building Code Department. A Minnesota certified Building Official must be appointed by the City Council of the City of Monticello to administer the code (Minnesota Statute 16B.65). 4-14: PERMITS AND FEES: (A) The issuance of permits and the collection of fees shall be as authorized in Minnesota Statute 16B.62, subdivision 1, and as provided for in chapter 1 of the 1884 Uniform Building code and Minnesota rules parts 1305.0106 and 1305.0107. (B) Permit fees assessed for work governed by this code shall be established by the City Council. (C) Surcharge: A surcharge fee shall be collected on all permits issued for work governed by this code in accordance with Minnesota Statute 16B.70. 4-1.5: FIRE ZONE DISTRICTS: All areas within the city of Monticello shall be in Fire Zone N3. 4-1-6: VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES: A violation of the code is a misdemeanor (Minnesota Statute 16B.68). 4-1.7: EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE: The effective date of this ordinance shall be upon publication. Adopted this 24th day of April, 1995. Mayor City Administrator Council Agenda - 4/24/95 22. Copddera#on gf ourchase of electric are/air (plasma) cutter for the public works shoo. (J -S-) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: During routine repair work and fabrication at the public works shop, we find it necessary to cut plate steel and aluminum. Typically in the past, we have used an acetylene torch to make these cute, which often ends up warping sheet steel and is rather slow. In addition, the resulting edges often have to be ground with a hand grinder to make them Ht properly for welding. Last year during the repair work and fabrication of the activated sludge splitter box for the wastewater treatment plant, we rented an electric are/air plasma cutter to cut all of the sheet steel. This saved a great deal of time and labor but also coat us $450 in rent. We propose to purchase a plasma cutter this year for the shop which is portable and could also be used at the wastewater treatment plant or other areas of the City. We placed an amount of $2,600 in the 19M budget, and over the past few weeks had demonstrations on two separate brands of plasma cutters. The model which worked the best for us was the Thermal Arc Pak Master 60 from Central McGowan in St. Cloud. This machine was the easiest to operate and provided a very smooth cut which needed no grinding for welding. We obtained two quotes for the machine, both at $2,236.50 including tax. We propose to purchase it Brom Central McGowan, Inc., in St. Cloud. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The Bret alternative is to authorize purchase of the Thermal Arc Pak Master 50 Plasma Cutter from Central McGowan, Inc. of St. Cloud for an amount of $2,238.50 including sales tax. The second alternative is not to authorize the purchase of the plasma cutter but to continue renting a machine as needed. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and the Street and Parks Superintendent that the City Council authorize purchase of the plasma cutter from Central McGowan as outlined in alternative Yl. Copy of quotes Brom Central McGowan and Northern Air Gas; Description of plasma cutter and specifications. 34 I R -1-;--:0Z WED 6 :23 CENTRAL McaClt4AH INC P . 02 Ioln V p -I ro r'I. rwvCld'C • M.J/ • - __--•PRICE QUOTATION_•••--�---.---__.__ _•--• CENTRAL-MCGOWAN, INC. P.O. BOX 66 a BT. CLOUD, MINN. 96202 a PM. (61 2) 268.9192 Is FAX (612) 962.7807 P.O. BOX 972 a LITTLt IALLS, MINN. 66748 Is PM. (8121832-9218 • FAX (612163-2-4576 City of Monticello 4/19(95 I�wft", 002002 ou.t.. o.n.. w•ao .aw•.. P 0 Box 1147 14/19/95 Net 10th ADorols. ..o•o....wnriwo uua *p .a .w..rau a. Monticello MN ,55762 ( At Reguired Our Delivery 1 I Brian Semroska Monticello "IeaCCv.s.ew rXXI =ER /t OUR QUOTATION ON TML 00004 NAMEO.eUBJECT TO TMG CONDITION$ NOT[01 _ CONCOIONri Th. MKvr ores I.— oot till. pw...ttan we not 10*1 to —sol Cho.paa w Who, og-mAltb a.leo opp..od In -rgl.e b, lbo Npre. 0111c3 of At, toile alt owtolto•t sad op,04—o m. Coolliigo. apo• M,%b.L att04rlh u,.,, o.o I Woy of —lels wW oil olk r mw.. beyond avr MMML IttKK or. bond o. Com w tywdltb., a.btlr,0 .. d-..1 9.0ollo , -d — .bl.1 to None. b, A• $.'IN b.lora 11.0 eK "—, t,po9,sph;C01 .cad rNnaaraphk .Trp• ,AIKY h, mr,Kttpn. r•rthoMr qpr... to att.pt •IA.car w po w ",too. sot M.t.n . of lot, pwtow to b. &4,rd %, ps wro' ►urtbnr etnnat h.b,l;,, l., p.. al•.4 tzd„ 1.ht Irlr;rpor.a.. •h- go.& an ..eM M P.Mu tw'. .poatl;.a11M. Wh.. gaoUM" xgdly, ..olWol t. b. IrrnIJ.1 Il, it ptr,tho.ar. o.,rlo ollo.o.Cs alwt bs TAd. Ip .so .pastes 9„d mot.rtol nwn be o1 .a..btt, pww' t. I.Cllllero ollk4M limAtttlan. Con00"..at tp•Cllkoq, Moises M,.,..holl M e...rnad In ",bll.h.d .rad. —I.— T.— I.tDw,bl•M .lib .hew .toted M,ot. w%;C% " oppap M hrCb4, lownal ad.r X11 nos ba bl.dt.p e. 16 7ot4t. Ac por our conversation, we are pleased to submit the following Quotations 1 Thermal ARC Pak Master 50 2,554.00 2,100.00 Ser#252037A196401K Sales Tax 156.50 {2,2)6.50 0-4-18-1995 02:19PM FROM NO AIRC+G TO Ahmm 29531701 P.01 AIMSr I y6Q6 PIERCE BUTLER ROUTE I I ST. PAUL MN 53104 (611) 488.6177 • FAX (612)'48810664 j Your Order was processed from: MT EM All MS MW^ 6650 Mip amj 10 bAkk 0 MW 1-612-40-M j 8 NWICELW CITY S Oft OB t1Q BIRO mml �18N6 O I T I M T TAS IN, Ams L iO P. a amt 1167 1 O D' MndELW ATtP I ME 180 1 .. • I ' I t • 1 � I I 1+� QAIE +Iw OQIE H66 z I 1 I I UM EVIIM 6ASM I I' I ' � I 11� I 1 IaN OIOIE IM aD1E u6► I I 1 1 11 I t l l It-6L'"f�l I ) I 11 1 1 1 PAR MM1E0 9 t 1210Lm O 12 ILO � I i I I i � 1 V At HOLM I lmi TAI& .N CM TAit .01 OM TMo I I I I I ULU TITIIII MLS � t � tUmilnMinCAY�vaYcaolua�6 fur r • =Wv w on one AM r AIbUr Aw arwYrl. wed. OlJ9T01[A1 i16MATLIAQ swrwclrom*cartrwupweleAwi n.rArrArr...i r er"rriwrew.rhl rw.o.o�RKw[�0{�6}Qt I�01 .1 �A00 BYtaOIOOL�.OY ►rp1�+p(r`i law a9V MOMGC I YID C�OIIDR101Y�YTp onf�pRI1i.11{�1R�P 1fli(1�W hd op SMD Ir! UIM.O K! I M L MWMICMT M RFU IM6 6ii10 MAOI ��•' q�dQi.LiY�11� Q• , A OLU1011a1C7 OlAIM WU NAAOI(e OMAN OKIIOY6 AccomrA w j aLRGDIQT t1 MIMQ •:600) aM6>DOb �, 1.1 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The Pak Master* 50 • Pak Master* 50 - The power supply provides 35 amp maximum Air Plasma Cutting output and includes all control circuitry, electrical and gas System Includes: inputs and outputs, pilot circuitry, and a quick disconnect torch leads receptacle. The power supply is shipped with a work cable and clamp attached. A 230V single-phase primary input power cable with molded 50 amp plug is optional. Machine torch systems also include a remote hand control and remote control wire harness. • PCH/M-35 Torch with Leads (Packaged Separately) - The torch provides a maximum 1/2 inch (12 mm) cut capacity. Hand torches are available in 70° and 40• configurations which include a handle and multi -position switch assembly. Machine torches include a rack and pinion mounting assembly. A phenolic (plastic) pinch block mounting assembly is optional. Torch leads are available in 125, 25, or 50 ft (3.8, 7.6, or 15.2 m) lengths with a quick disconnect torch leads fitting for simple installation. The PCH/M-35 includes a spare parts kit which provides an assortment of replacement consumable torch parts. • See page 4 for a list of other system options and accessories Figure 1-A System Components GENERALIN 1.2 SPECIFICATIONS Controls ON/OFF Switch RUN/SET Switch Output Current Control Comer Slowdown C4mrd Pressure Regulator Control Panel Indicators LED Indbcators: AC Power, TEMP, PIP (Parte-In-Place), GAS, DC Power, PILOT Pressure Gouge Input Power 200 to 460 VAC W01.), 50 or 60 Hz, Single or Three -Phase 575V Requires Additional TmrWormer (Catalog No. 9.8211) Ootpuf Power Continuously variable from 15 to 35 Amps maximum 709E Duty Cycle Cut Capacity 121n (12.7 mm) at 10 ipm Pilot Cireultry High Frequency (HF), Constant DC CNC Capability Remote Start/Stop, OK -to -Move, wW Comer Slowdown (CSD) Wewd 69.8 be (31.7 kg) Dimensions 18.5' High x 11.1' Wide x 21.7- Long (470 x 2a2 x 551 mm) Table I•A Power Supply Specifications Conliguratlons 701 or 90° Hand Torch, 100' Madrino Torch Currant Rating 35 am" Maximum, DC Straight Polarity Duty CK1. 100% 0 35 annpa Cutting Range Most materials up to 12 In (12.7 mm) Plop Rating 1/4 In (6.3 mm) TransMWstswe 3/8 In (9.5 mm) Consumable Pmts Gan Distributor. Electrode. Tip. Shield Cup open Compressed Air, Nitrogen (Nr) P Pure Rsqulremerlb 70 psi (4.8 BAR) Flow Requiremnts Cutting • 200 acth (94.4 IPM) Gouging - 230 oelh (108.5 tpm) AveRsbls Leads Lengths 12.5 It (3.8 m), 25 it (7.2 m), or 50 it (15.2 m) Extendable to 15011(45.8 m) Table )-8 Torch Specifications GENERAL INFORMATION 2 n� T Council Agenda - 4/24/96 23. ronsideralion of acceutina bide and awarding oroiect - Pathwav Project W.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On Tuesday, April 11, 1995, at 10 a.m., bids were opened on the pathway project at city hall. Three bids were received, with the lowest bid coming from Buffalo Bituminous in the amount of $406,076.65. The engineer's estimate for the project was $354,210. The low bid submitted by Buffalo Bituminous was approximately 15% over the engineer's estimate. According to Michael L. Tardy, District State Aid Engineer, the ISTEA program will fund 80% of the total cost of the project, including the 15% overrun over the engineer's estimate. The projected cost for the federal, state, and local contributions to funding the project is as follows: $324,861.32 from the federal government, $43,383.65 from state aid funds, $37,831 from the City of Monticello general fund. The original project budget for this project in early 1993 called for a City expenditure of $90,000. Based on the bid tabulation, the cost to the City is now projected at $123,000, of which $43,000 will come out of state aid funds as noted above. The project, though more expensive to the City than originally expected, does include additions to tate project such as full sidewalk on Washington Street from Broadway to 7th Street in front of the high school and construction of a foundation for widening of County Road 75 east of the high school. The project also includes a very expensive foot bridge over Otter Creek designed at federal standards, which are higher than bridge standards contemplated under the original grant proposal. Motion to accept bids and award the project to Buffalo Bituminous in the amount of $406,076.65. Under this alterative, the project will proceed. Motion to deny bids. This alternative should be selected if Council has a problem with the 15% overrun over the engineer's estimate or no longer is interested in completing the project. Please note that the Minnesota Department of Transportation is comfortable with the low bid even though it is 16% over the construction estimate and will be paying 80% of the 16% overrun on the total project cost. 35 Council Agenda - 4/M5 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative H. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Clerk Administrators certificate; Office memorandum from Michael Tardy, District State Aid Engineer, regarding the bid opening. 36 Mn/OOT TP•30308-01 (3/80) C L E R K L A D M 1 N I S T R A T O R' S C E R T I F I CAT E FEDERAL AID PROJECT V STATE OF MINNESOTA ) REFEREPCE (S.P. )as City of _ H—ti ..tt,. ) 1, R4,1, UM Fomite. the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Clerk/Administrator of the City of M^^tirallo and State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that a _ rev�tnr meeting of the City Council of the City of Mnncirelln held on the 24th day Of __&r.41 , 19 q_, the following named contractors Ruffnln Ri .min— Veit 6 Compmny._ Sunram Construction Tnr. submitted bide for the furnishing of all labor, tools, materials and equipment nec- essary for the construction of the work provided for under plane and specifications for that improvement on _AVril 11. 1005 ; otherwise known as S.P. No. _777-ngn-nl , Minnesota Project STP EN93(02 1) located between Mandrn, nnk Awn nna Haar River Street nlonR CSAR 7% being approximately 1.816 miles in length. The bid of Ruffnln Ric,min„e in the amount of $_4.Q6,076.65 appeared t Abe the lowest bid received, subject to final audit, and on motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilparson , it was voted by said City Council to recommend to the Commissioner of Transportation, as Agent for said City, that: (said contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder) or (that all bids be rejected). Attest: City Clerk/Administrator Cba3spasaaf►rticyLowmwil Mayor IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto act my hand and affixed my official seal this day of , 19 City Clerk/Administrator Recommendation: Uistriet State Aid Engineer 9 FPR 18 '95 13:12 DSM MLS. 111 DQAm mer: MaIDOT•lrldd Operations Division BnLxrld rrA790F hUNNU fA Office Memorandum DArs: April 13,1995 r ItutIVEU To= Paul Bergman - M.S. 650 Off-ShceleWayeion&Assoc. Offioe of Contract AAminigratim COMM # rsAse , Muclrad L Tardy - APR 17 1555 . District Slate Aid Erwin= dame Hero Capt' nage Neva mans, (218) M2475 1-800-65'1-3971 wen , S.P. 22248041 (Rikewar), Mianesots Project Na 574 EN93(021) Length 3.836 miles, aa-aa1}aaHioad Wks-path looted at — - various ww1oas in the city of Mondomo In Wright County CamsUw biwmimous bike path and Bddge'•No. 86516, 70.1r X 11' pedestrian bridge, timber option at sten frau option LE 77NG: Bids Were opened far the above refleseocetl'pavject an Ttanday, April 11, 1993, at 10 a.m. in the Montioello City Hall by Bret Weiss. Monticello City P,naineer and myself. Bid proposals were received from dw tollowing contracton: BdEdo, BiMminous 3406,076.65 Vdt & Company, Inc. $413,383.63 Swuam Construction, Inc. $492.990.50 Engineer's Estimate 3354,210.30 Thew were minor es:on found in Veit's bid proponl. The a xteasion for line no. 029 and the total bid were in error. The law bid by Buffalo Biwminous is approximately 15 peroent over the Enjincer's Estimate. The City Coumdl will take formal wdOn to recommend award to On lowest responsible bidder at its nett meeting on April 24. At that time, the ally Clerk's Cmdflcate will be forwarded to you. The bid proposals are enclosed. Don Rainneadllm Povlch - Baxter Pat Murphy - M.S. SM FHWA Bret Weiss - OSM M1 T/tg tosf alp txane W amgW a*wro 787, �. �wr . ( I ' �� Council Agenda - 4/24/95 24. Considera#pg of authorising feasibllity etndv -Meadow Oat; 4th Addit of g. (J.OJ A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: A few days ago, the City received a petition requesting completion of a feasibility study for development of the Meadow Oak 4th Addition. Meadow Oak 4th Addition is located between the existing Meadow Oak area and the Briar Oakes development area. The 4th Addition consists of 12 platted Iota that currently do not have city sewer, water, or road services. The plat includes an 8 -ft bituminous trail along the rear property line of the lots adjoining Briar Oakes and another trail between Lot 1, Meadow Oak 4th, and Lot 1, Block 1, Meadow Oak 3rd Addition. The lots in the 4th Addition were platted some years ago in conjunction with the Meadow Oak development, but improvements were never constructed. A major reason why the work was probably never completed is because a number of the lots are difficult to develop due to poor soils, swamp, low elevation, etc. A relatively high demand for building lots now makes these Iota developable from an economic standpoint. According to my interpretation of the wetland act, the tots are exempt from the wetland rules under exemption 24 due to the fact that they were platted within five years prior to 1991. This property may also be exempt from the Army Corps of Engineers permitting process; therefore, the project can be installed as proposed under Army Corps of Engineer rules. Prior to the meeting on Monday, I plan to do some final checking on this matter to make sure that development can occur in the area proposed. SANITARY SEWER PLANT CAPACITY MUIS As noted during previous discussion. City staff is concerned that the pace of development may outstrip our ability to provide sanitary sewer service. Perhaps it does not make sense for the City to finance the cost to extend additional sanitary sewer and water lines into undeveloped areas when there exists the possibility of overtaxing sanitary sewer plant resources. According to the City Attorney, the City is not obligated to complete the project via the public improvement process. He also noted that due to the fact that the property is already platted, the City may be under some obligation to allow the property to be developed using private finding. In addition, due to the late arrival of the application, the project was not included in the bond issue under item •12; therefbre, the City would need to bond separately to acquire fiusds for the project, which would be expensive for such a small project. 37 Council Agenda - 4/24/95 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt a resolution accepting the petition for a feasibility study and authorizing preparation of a feasibility study. Under this alternative, City staff would move forward by working with the City Engineer to prepare the feasibility study necessary to support the public improvements to this subdivision. The applicant has submitted a $2,500 deposit to fund this expense. 2. Motion to deny acceptance of the petition, authorize staff to return the $2,500 deposit, and refuse consideration of City funding of extension of lateral sewer and water utilities until sewer plant capacity issues are better understood. This alternative should be selected if the City wishes to delay extension of more sanitary sewer service. Under this alternative, the applicant could request permission to complete the project via the private improvement process. 3. Motion to table acceptance of the petition and authorize staff to return the $2,500 deposit. This alterative should be selected if the City Council wants staff to do additional research regarding plant capacity issues. Perhaps with additional data to be provided in the next few weeks/month regarding infiltration problems, it may make sense to complete the project under the public improvement process. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION; It is our view that the City Council should select alternative Q. We are not comfortable at this time in opening up new lots for development until treatment plant capacity issues are resolved. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of petition; Site location map. 38 CITY OF MONTICELLO PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA I (we), the undersigned owner(s) of the property described below petition for a feasibility study pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 (Local Improvements, Special Assessments), for the rullowlittj lmyruvnmtrots: Please indicate with an R the improvements requested: Sanitary Sewer •/ Water Storm Sewer ✓ Bituminous Surfacing r Curb and Gutter Street Lighting I (Ne) agree to pay 100% of .the cost of the feasibility study. I (we) understand the City Council may pro -rate the cost of the feasibility study attributable to my property if the scope of the study pertains to other benefiting nn property owners. Description of Property: (,C�/n (.� `2j, (! Signature of Owners:/rod- �% (7�uy 00) a, 6,9S- IMPFEAS.PETi 9/16/92 �k � City of Monticello 250 East Broadway P.O. Box II47 Monticd1o, MN. 55162 Date Received of DOLLARS t o� I For 14 rums I NTT"= I �Ml1aR C'. /(:, / T S— (rOAW MO.394 MMblm R-Ift aq MFADO ftrt" 0 AW ". 4 A M Q wo.w l WYltadh..o• yt CITY OF MON—"ELLO RESIDENTIAL LOT PROJEM-14S AND ABSORPTION J February 1995 Lot Develoament sewer Connectkms Development E"&19I Approved (Approved Urban I OAA 1M 1888 7907 1898 1989 12000 2001 trn aorw Const Wn 95 Prel PWM Bervlos IScattered Iota 55 1 10 10 10 10 10 5 Hips IV 32 25 7 ICardhW Cardinal Hills V 32 10 22 Cardinal Hills VI 28 10 18 4k IHomip • 78 42 24 12 HogkrdNaW Plus Single Family 100 25 25 25 25 1Briar rakes Phase I 8 4 4 13dar Oakes Phase 11 32 8 8 8 B Oak Ridge - Existing Phase 36 36 Oak Ridge - Future Phase 92 46 46 Orin Thompson 192 64 64 64 I KrauMauar/RNw Mi9 Twin Homes phase 1 48 10 20 18 Twin Homes phase 11 48 20 20 8 Single Family phase 1 41 10 20 11 Staple Fen* Phase 11 lib 10 20 20 18 MShotes 48 48 IEaslwoodKr O 33 3 7 7 7 9 Klein Forme, Single Family - Phase 1 M 35 35 Sirgle Family - Phase 11 37 10 27 R -PUD North - Phaso 1 128 10 45 45 28 R•PUD Woo - Phase 9 N 14 30 Sin" Fam. S. of Schl. Bhd 140 10 48 48 38 QM 1 131 1 4" 1 289 I a38 2_ pw1jutatimsu"I 1 131 1 875 1 8B4 11098 11388 233 410 828 MOTE. Dom no MM ff%& * hw" aYirb. 11r pmMmr ftow nupwrt h ftBw AawloparlrY prajadlorr bowl on Ypra trop Orwlopara TipwaruftdvwtionMMftlytloFModnpom VaMISMhtGaW~pmwrpmMdawwerMtatrM.irebbw (�— �� )RESIDINV.WK4: 04/21/98 ERC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/31/95 09:03:39 ::ARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38297 03/30/95 BAUER/EUGENE & LOIS 38298 03/30/95 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 38299 03/30/95 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORD 38299 03/30/95 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORD 38300 03/30/95 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 38301 03/30/95 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 38302 03/30/95 HELLMAN/VICTOR G GENERAL CHECKING L Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL 903 TEMP EASEMENT RE,NTA 1.000.00 118 WATER/SNOW/ATV REG 925.00 254 RECORD ESMT/M 0 STRM 5 19.50 2S4 RECORD ESMT/EASTW000 K 19.50 39.00 *CF IV8 MATER/SNOW/ATV REG 857.75 219 NOTARY FEE/O JACOBSON 25.00 906 EASEMENT/M OAK STOR 1.000.00 TOTAL 3,066.75 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/31/95 09:40:12 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38303 04/03/95 ANDERSON/GARY 38303 04/03/95 ANDERSON/GARY 38304 04/03/95 ARAMARK 38305 04/03/85 BERG/JULIE 38306 04/03/85 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 38306 04/03/95 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 38308 04/03/95 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 38306 04/03/95 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 38307 04/03/95 CENTRAL MINN INI'TIAT 383,08 04/03/95 CLINE/RICHARD 38309 04/03'/95 COMMUNICATION AUDPTO 30310 04/03/95 COMPUTER PARTS & SER 30311 04/03/95 G & K SERVICES 30312 04/03/95 HERMES/JERRY 30313 04/03/85 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC 30314 04/03/95 HOLMES & GRAVEN 90314 04/03/95 HOLMES & GRAVEN 30314 04/03/95 HOLMES & GRAVEN ,10314 04/03/85 HOLMES & GRAVEN 313314 04/03/95 HOLMES 8 GRAVEN :) 3319 04/03/05 INTER CONE OF OLDG 0 90316 04/03/95 KOROPCHAK/OLIVE 90317 04/03/05 KOJICH/PATRICA In310 04/03/85 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA 90310 04/03/95 MN POLLUTION CONTROL I:l?0 04/03/95 MN PUO EMPIOV LAC -OR 3f)3:'1 04/O9/95 M0NTIt;F1.10 ANIMAL CO Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C 11 GAS RESMB/B'LO INSP 10.00 11 TRAVEL REIMS/BLD INSP 56.83 66.83 848 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 114.00 905 TRAVEL REIMB✓-COMPUTER 36.34 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 10.63 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 0.14 T94 CAR PHONE CHARGES 4.88 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 11.57 27.22 822 CMIF GRANT PAYMENT 1.100.21 458 TRAVEL REIMB/SEMINAR 4.66 38 NEW EQUIP INSTALL/F D 634.24 $00 COMPUTER MTC AGRMT/ 3,039.00 851 RUGS/MTC OF BLD 28.41 81 LM RARV CLEANING CONT 227.50 05 GAD/FIkt DEFT 00.10 96 HRA LEGAL FEQS 134.14 96 *FV* 400.00 86 LEGAL FEED/FAV MAR FAB 93.00 08 LEGAL FEES/MISS SHO 1.216.00 86 LEGAL FEES/TAPPER PROJ 24.80 1,074.03 281 811 UNIFORM CODE/BLD IN 53.10 87 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMEI 20.56 207 TRAVEL REIMF)/CUMPUT1iR 11.00 00 REG FFE./SEMINAR/RICK W 16.00 127 ANNUAL PERMIT F1'E/S(W 775.07 423 ANNUAL ODES/RICK W 1510.00 105 ANIMAL CONTROL CONY 1.100.00 c C' *C1 CC' BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/31/95 00:46:12 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38322 04/03/95 MONTICELLO SENIOR CI 38323 04/03/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38324 04/03/85 NORTHWEST MINNESOTA 38325 04/03/95 P C EXPRESS INC. 383?6 04/03/95 PHOTO I- 38327 38327 04/03/95 RELIABLE CORPORATION 38327 04/03/95 RELIABLE CORPORATION a832; 04/03/95 RELIADLE CORPORATION 30328 04/03/95 RIVERSIDE OIL 38329 04/03/95 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COM 30T:)0 04/03/95 TAB PRODUCTS CO. 90391 04/03/95 THEISEN/MATT 30772'04/03/95 U.S. POSTMASTER 90333 04/03/05 WOLF5TELLER/RICHARD 30333 04/03/95 WOLFSTELLER/RICHARD 10J34 04/03/95 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO J0�)95 04/00/05 WRIGHT COUNTY JOURNA GENCRAL CHECKING A Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 139 MONTHLY CONTRACT PY 2,833.33 148 UTILITIES 215.63 156 SEMINAR REG/GARY A 10.00 77,8' 2 NEW COMPUTERS/C H 4,600.10 743 PICTURES/SEWER COLL 11.40 1,79 MISC COMPUTER SUP 63.41 179 PRINTER STANDS,ETC 216.48 179 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 38.42 318.37+'CI 496 OIL/FIRE DEPT 28.28 644 AD FOR BIDS/SOUTHWEST 266.25 671, LABELS/CIT,Y HALL. 46.11 457 TRAVEL REIMB/SEMINAR 10.38 210 POSTAGE/CITY HALL 1,500.00 217' TRAVEL RE3MB/SEMINAR 36.55 217 TELE REIM3 3.74 40.29 )KC 219 3CERG GRANT PAYMENT 2,760.41 233 SUOSCRIPTION/W C PRESS 23.00 TOTAL ^2.234.07 ERC VINANCIAL SYr.TEM 04/04/98 1S100r09 D.isbursemnnE Journal llAKRANT OAiE VENDOR D,F5CRIPTION AMOUNT CLf GENERAL CHECKING 3xZIS 04/03/95 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEA 296 1ST 07 WATER CONN F 2.165.00 3Al31 04/03/LR5 U.R•.POSTMASTCR P.1D NPW!',I.FTTFR MA,T1 TNOf, '}71•,.76 3.0339 04/04/95 EXECUTRAIN 099 COMPUTER SEMINARS 820.00 38339 04/04/95 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 394 RETURN RECYCLING; SCANN 22..50 3e 0 04/04/95 LIGHTING PLUS 782 DISPOSAL OF BULBS 12.00 98341 04/04/35 LUKACH/JOHN 327 MILEAGE EXPFN5E 70.00 3E341 04/04195 LUKAGH'/JOHN 327 MILEA¢E ExFE14SF 70..42 13x41 04/04/95 LUKACH/JOHN 327 MILEAGE. EXPENSE 20..41 30341 04/04'/95 LUKACH/JOHN 327 MILEAGE FXPENSE 20.41~ 02.014 IFN 3034? 04/04/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 140 UTILITIES 2..02'/.17 1').142 04/04/95 NORTHERN STATES POWC 140 UTILITICG 397.00 3C;62 04/04/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 140 UTILITIE; 4,403.09 10342 04/04/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 140 UTILITIC9 71.I5.1'� JC76 2 199:42 04/04/05 Qk/64/99 NORTHERN STATES NORTHERN STATES POWE POWC 140 140 UTILITIES UTILITIE'? 14,14 470.'76 ;h2 04/04/95 NORTHMN ST,ATEC POWE 140 U7IL1TIF4 7)^4.20 30342 04!06/4)5 NORTHERN OTATE5 FOWL 149 UTILITI.1.9 0. 51i 30':1•? 04/04/95 NOFTHERN STATCC POWC 140 UTILITICG 'JCo.Io JC 96 (1!1/n4/05 ROYAL TI RE OF MONTIC 227 REPAIRSJr6 WLR COLL 74.27 3.)044 .14/04,/95 WRIGHT COU`7TY RECORD 254 MI�;e GEGO '?5.00 �Jlr1l RAL (HEOKING ItlTAL S3. i 3.SG KkC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 0 4-/ U 8 /'12 5 1'0x28':"05 (ZIWA&,RANT DATE VEMOOR GENFRAL CHECKING' �:d945 04/06/95 AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOO 3.0346 04/06/94 %R DGEWATER TELE?HON �03�46 64/06/95 EIRIDGEWA3E'R TELEPHDN 38346 04106/95 SRMOFWATER TELEPHON ^834.6 04/06/81 BS 11)GEWATER TELf'PHON 30346 04/013/95 BRIDGEWATER TtLEPHON 3319346 04/06/95 BRIDGEW'ATER TELEPHON 30340 04/06/95 SRIDGEWAT�R TCLEPHON 3) 3�-u 04/06/95 SkrDGEWATER TEI ;FHCIN 3U348 04/06/95 FSftl'MzWAT R� TE'LE,PHON 3Z)I4G 04/06/95 BRMGEWATER TELEPHON 3034 414/U6/13 OR'f'UtiLWATFR I::LF,PHON :16 04/06/65 BP10GE-JA7ER TEL:F'NON Disbursement Journal DEGCPIPTION AMOUNT 260 REPAIR FIRE DEPT GAP 401.00 26 T7kFPH0NE CHARGES 115,94 V, T-ELFPIRONE CHARGE_ 59.06 2/i T',EL,z:135NE CFi'AR4E'3 164.8? 24 TELEPHONE CHARGE'S 142..00 21, TELEPHONE CHARGC9 62.13 2L `,FLEPHONE CHAr,GLS 50.00 2& TtiLE-PHVN7 CHARGF.3 59. of;, 24 TFLEPHONE CHA6("E� G'.E7. 24 TELEPHONE CHA,RGL5 MA119 ?L T?Lr,'HVNE CHARGES 66.06 24 TELEPlf-,J' r HARUE S 3'05.94 L, TEIiPtHONIL CHAhGGb "J. GG 1.501.10 9E'' -7 01:/00/96 C J 2ROWN E101NE59 S 58-1 CITY NEMCLETTERO PRIM 200.40 04/06/05 COPY OUPLCATING PROD F0:7s3 04,/06/95, CULLIGAu C-" JDT.,O OL/OG/95 D 0 K GC(tUGG RCCYCLI 1FcS1 04/00/fIS F2EORITE CONTROLS, I ]GAI)i 04/00/35 FCEORITL CONTROLS., I 40251 CV(10/98 FCEORITE CONTROLS,. I 4 1 COPY MCH Rt'1 C/LI J 2A:2V i4 .40 753 WATER COFT (MG/RENTAL 2..I 011 MARCH' RLCVCLING CON 3.,531.00 BE; MIGC P,&C'F 0EnVIC£'./WAT 010,M 56 CHEMIGAL9/WATI'R OUP 1<.➢'93.70 50 CHEMICAL,/GJNNY FU -3 1'01.70 E.001.GO J0/06(96 FRONTLYY'NE PMFIRE $10 F-IRt DEPT ('10111M(3 599.00 :10!'3? t)4/CU/94 F60P1TLI,NE PLUG FIRE S16 FTi2C DEPT LV11Ps4XCJ !00•.013 .04 ..v ;G)'» ()4106/1h MAU''3 Gfr3U9 100 CtGANING nUG/A'4TVA1_ CO 45,.11 :C; 5J 04/0G/135 MAUO PGDU 100 i'"rw GUPP1_IFD/k.w f, r;£, PO.G? JE �3 Q'4FOG/OG MA119 EOi�UO 111 ] %1.%ANIlJG Oc (OU/05 M4k"', t G C U 100 MIG!' �UPPL IE'L/P t1At.L .,L(, 73.1 rt?U'�M PA31. t xr7tt ?OJ PAGCw CNAGGFi, 0 .J ;4 :14166/Q'j : A(3ti LIM 701 PAU']Q CMA:i ; i 8',10C/'5 r,AC,L LING l0. PACED CF1i,1;;S JCJ`r, 04/00)75 :'A;:' 1. IN 70'0 4 -AG,:,•' k,11AUGL- 9")i F/E t`^',;( LI'JU ?i- PAGkR 01AGGF' J 3. C,tt ')4/t'�PI°5 A',. VINI, !O') PA.iCR CHAR61 ; 1'A"-) C- LING 7;' PA5V U f11AE(4', :tti .}� ; i4 1)(110, V)8 L-Af;C LINK 7(13 PA'.ii':r 6'RC ffNAMC1Al' VY9TEM 04/'08/35 10:40 c 05 ZIARC,,ANT DATE VENDOR GJ -NERAL HECXlr4G yE fn WOE495 ('AUL A - A'CCte1t4 V, AS,$ 303.';0 04/05/95 SAM17F_L50NJ•Yi FV' 0t4/Oer85 PAMV4LFC)MISTEbE 1:-:357 D4/00/95 THEISEN/MATT 3,0317 06/06/95 THC-ISHN/MATT JU350 UL/03/95 UNOCAL. 04/06/95 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA Ji2);'1 OA/00V, VAS90 ROBSL,yH Rf MOVA, 10359 04/06/95 VASKO RUP,OI£H REMOVA "30 06/0G/95 MOLFSrELLER/RICURD )0;(i0 06/06/95 WOLFSTLLLER/RICHARD r �Iui 04/0:195 VRI�;MT HENNCPIN .; L'CU —;,-0 U40WD5 11k2GHT FIENNEPIN SEOU ;: Nl:ftAl 'yHECKING N ©i,nbur-sement Jouo^u•) DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 030 PART TFMr ELCI INSPEC 775.00 5 7,0 1: OF?T TRAVEL. CXP/'`L'M ? )9.. '% E3'^ kEIMSIFIRE DP HELMET U 3.00 301.111.16 vf�k: 457 F DEPT TRAVEL EXPI,BEM 299.'6 37 RE lft/FIR(' UP HELMF.'( RE 309.26, x, 13 GA$/F i4M ),.VT D4. 17 �i$4 GARUAGE C.iN)RACT P 10,06A, O& !�24 SALE:; TAX/GAR;)AGF_ CON Gsil. �3 524 PICKUP OI! VkUM t.U. 30 10,703.+76 117 RF7ME/MEET"TNG EXP! N: E 34..6 217 ECCORO EA':I:MI:NT RElt,J, 30.00 ✓4 . '_.6 �C' � 1 075 MTC AG9MT/ALA!W0LC .'C 17. 12 079. MT'C ACC4MT/ALA°CAfPARt10 15. rO IiPf: FkN'An1C1,A1_ 'SY.SYTM /tU/3_ti 1Jo163,:.30 Q5&A,V'Y OAT -E VCItLJY)R• g2flERAL CHECKTN4 I 310302 04/1 C/9,8 MN DEPART OF NATURAL i 30363 04/1,91.96 MXOOCNDORf/d4HN 30,0)64 04/10/86 A T R T INFO SVSTEMO Z83 6S. 04,/'10/95 A.E. MICHAELS �I S0366, D15 /10/95 ASM'EOUIPMENT & SUPP 3393(07 0101-0/95 AGAOS%2 Ff4VIRONMrNTA 301'G0 C4/'10/95 ASSOCIA4,TM VEYE&INAR ;,010^ 04/1(;/98 SOWIS MIOU913T TRANIIM ?0 w, 10/55 'ftiUS3NE5w RE+;'C1RUS' COR 11+/10%.73 BUSINEO-0 RE0003' r*R 10..9:71 34/t1)/9G COMMLOJI,CAYI4N AUDIT0 S: W5t'1()/9i> DYNA SVIrrEM5 Da !'1'l IS.5 (:ARL' S weLpx"G 6 SND .044/,1'WS E"HEAO' DISCOUNT VOF f3 17 i 04/'10/oJi. 'tZNNIS CAUING.Tri/,J,IM 1.C7 %,' Wil 1,010S Cc rs U 1;CRVI,C-FlS '1'7? C4/1OMD f9A17TNCRI'U iJf'g?9@ PRO C' :Y 0P4�<10%fly HAfif01,O AUTO GUPPL'V (4/101,..5 RA114Y15 AUTO SUPPLY 04/10/95 HARRY'S AU -i,?) fr PKV f n i'1.11J°- HEf1mk0/eft f:GV 04113/Dj 1 M r4T1. COMPANY Disburaemepz wMuxnal OfSeRIR'TTON At'OUNT CL, 118 taATFR/5NCw/ATV fi'E(s 408.OD 900 REIMWGTZC-L TMFD 1W10P13 44.'95 15 "122- DIPT TE,LEPiONE CH ]3:.18 338 P'A1VT/VATtr7R DEF'+ so.S4 501 MTC SUPPLIES/REKUO,C 73..:0 761 #Fy- 970,90 001 ANIMAL CONTROL GUPP'L It 02,G0 80.0 TRAKM:13 Y10N R$P/PW I Vr`J.0a 21 PAVRPLL CNfvaL PEtI iYi 4?0.04 23 *t -Y- 4,:-,q.GG G -.7o1,44 6. 'J" i 1.0 PAMx 9t�AiCdR/.:I6r El£d>' :>4.91 54" NUT -D C, 6GL 1 </ ;HAP' C' !i 1.14. a ) 747 Y}kWPR -t AM-4?VWOP A 1; 118.07 S1 COMPVYEQ SOFT!!A6'.L/C 1',�iY2'.4y 54 FII�Q CAD7NGT/CITY "Al. JIG.n- i 051 CAPv/.;YPE'FT DEPT 17.90 377, 0Q0TAGC/4ETMt4 At P PAST 0:. ;T 70, "MALL TOil,15/1,1:-J10 ,C GAR 10.6: 78r� V^Fkl R!'.)AIR (��PART(VICiIfil. 7.;.^0 q 01 L111WARY, CLEANING 4L, --.'J1 94 t1I1 fST;'f;fAY DLPY 61,11 Q0 G( -I,9 mjl ArJ1"A1 tcn gin' 104 LGU';;' n .>A EQ I f 1J e L' r r c1 ^ J E;' X F EAANCIAL SYSTEM 0 A/ 1 13 /'S4 13 : 0. ,:90 W,4RRANT OATP VE4OR GFNI:RAL CHECUIN 3' leaa'v R4!•11 lts.s. MARvO RD 3UC5 Q4/141e5 KARTIE 'D FARM SF,,'•2Vr,C 700,6 04140/95 MN CONWAY FTR'7 & SAP H8c;1.. 04/-10195 MN CONWAY FIRC &' bA; Disbursgmenx -Jo rrol 0 fEt0^IVT1ON hmukv v!. 910 AORiAL $0%VEVi'9 nFS 10-729.00 10.7 t? -a 50 .,:i I 285 M. r.6 WATER DtPll 5UPP0 '21.,28 8a5 MT.sc twflp ovi)..'LvEs 34'.e's S3'.1GS ; HZO ? 04!'10/95 MONTIC It LO ANIMAL M 13.5 A44MAL CC'JTRkDt CONT 1 , 1.00..00 1)03CC 04!'10/95 MONTICE'L'LO OFFICE P£ 704 J 04/1'el9S MONTICSL'L'O OFFICE: Pi 44 / 10/ 95. MONTIC TUU OFFICE 'Pit' MUNTIC EL'Li1 41:F ICE PSR, 0'x00/05 MONTICaLO OFFLOF 'PR. '3DA37 Qr /10/4,5 ONTIC'!LLO TIMES 40.:';0 Oni•1'0/95 MONTIC 9LLO T'IWO 04 / 1:4/95 MONTIC VU0 i SMES �11 0../'1,0/0fi MQNTIC 3LO TIMES 'CC ,.O 06/10/95 KONTICOLLO TIMG9 383-': O'4Iit/ 9S "RIC RL'LO TIMES ,!P'- U'3 04/1Q'J05 MON TIC5LLO: 'TIMES, ?0'= -11) Q(ij1n)'9S MON,7IC ELLO -TIMES )W--'13 08/1'0/Ob MONTIC EULO TIMi9' tax_,^,�, IU014IA5 MOMTIC RULO, TIMES 30209, Op'/111'/00' M71 0109TRIWUTING CO T'' " Ct)'iO'!OD NATION'Al 4LI'MI;N11 PAR NATIOt. AL OU,OHING PAR b0,g1 V41Q),rt5 0A7IOW,AL RULMSNG PAR Js_' - 4 'Sz+/'10/06 NATIONAL BUGHING PA3 ,AFL^" -'I 0; � W)5 NATIONAL k)V1,' 7NG PAR '�r,05 OLLON, 0LZL7,ACAP4 6 ;? rJIf1'/'J'3 OL30i0. USGc'.,AfAIJ E 1IJlGj ut.( bdl,. U. E i,,ntrgl7 p `r^,'1Z .'•' J+f?/`I'x '6/-1.'04, y� :,'.�.AGAT4 6 i•;r1016 Qt GN. Ui tY,AUGF f, Js )' rite+i 0') 7f 'Of:. U'TRCT,AGAW it t'31i Pt1L1 H6kKS OFFICf aUF 16.30 136 r,YTY HAtI COPY M01 ,�'A 1 -fr.A9 I7G F'' '404K^a COPY ;i.Cii PAFkR' 04,.4b 13G f,intpV Q#3P.Y h:C11 UAPt-? 40.17 r 0 CTTV :(ALO @FtIct S(12 )71.0^ 7to. 1') 140 LEGAL PUKUrA',s'SN0 14:,CU 1411 IaN9UPLOWIN6 Wq-jj%5 1'G1,t0 140 --f4dWM001LC: 1) CLO PCrtM 1G9.pD 140 L UA1. NOT`xca^ IiI1.1 `3 V 10,11 140 L2 -GAL NOSICU-/- K'17 AN, 50.,60 140 L::GAL NO'f L8tvrATHL1A,v 144 LjGAZ NOT IC EYCA0TWOC)D 7D. -GO 140 L HOA -L NOTIMI'.S,Y. SHORk 51-. e 140 f4nC PUBLIC INFO 43.,20 140 n, 119 FOR m"'TI TIG:,;'- 15?1'09 1.120.'20 300 VON REPAIR PARVUPARK 333.40 144 'VFH REPAID VAt ; :/`iSaF 110.03 144 1~001A QRPATL PACtTWx',% ?).,50 1b'4 VIH (2GPAIQ, PAQIUPA;!t:1 72:00 1'44 0MAI-L TOAz D/;HOC 8 QA 10,01 14-4 VEH RC -.P P'AR'fC;'/1)W INt`111.47 ?f)':' i 092 „cQAI FE:.7/Gt'FLLi41'G1 i'_.CQ 3']a '--41GAI> FN ,)'HRR Pj.c0 P% t-1I6Q LEGAL FC[;, ;0 892 1 i'OAt, AOS. L E(,At t'f'f.f/LnGTHl2('x) I` tu/.GG PR®¢ G�wbJt'�-'JI 1,�'i1j,1111' II0 tJ ;H .'±)MPUT[.4 f4 , x' ;� I! '1. id fi( %, a t Frrrr:ac�nL :'t,t•yEp1 / 13/,)5 ' 3 :04:,60 -WRA-4T 4+ArF VENtvnR 3:033,4 01, f 10/95 P140TO I :Ja/10/95. PRE.US&Os C}� r-ANI'N4 Z O'al l'3/9b Vfit LAE 4'E r 5 itt+AfAlN + :i D-OJSO Os* /10/85 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE x.)97 04110/08 RIVI:RSIOE OIi 2'93 04/10/95 OAFETY-IILEEN CORP. 36309 041A0195 SIMP$0N/MARC 3Oil PU 04/10/95. SOUTMAM BUSINEss COM 1O4U0 04/ W99 SOUTNAM BUSINESS COM .1b01 ^.4/10/03 SPECTRUM :aIJRPLY C0: UI 10/15 CPECTRUM SUPPLY CO._ ;'.:4A' i:' I'01n6 TRUFMAtJ-WELTERf,, INN J�40 ".Y113/8'i U.S. PBUTMA'a-Vr. _r;;n7d. C.-^•d1(+/�. VQ1..,L�R�CNT/RCiPhf�Y. rQ4 '.".t 10./ 74k!tJV.i H? C004TV 401TO ; C,(, `,, r Ia1'9s C..RI'GMY CQUNYY-AUPITO ',;1,/1')105 V.M.4.A. 4.4 01INNEAPO 5 4P.7 dr,/1lT/95 v' mANUVACTOPING 1:A G.r,'A. 11AL CF:€(:=NG O,iS:1Mr3EC?i1h; J4w�'.OD1 Cif :C"Ri► YTt�'� AM.ICiL1N`i E r i, 74 MPC. tOV/6W 18'.21 1)3 FIRE O'EPY C:LFANOP� rON aO..gO 1d1:4. L_I'tY kALL MLANI-qG tO 66'M.00' 450.03 175 WWTP CONMACT PAVM 3?.32�,.00 440 QTL/C'1[V-'1' n,„?i 1.3.11 104 MTC AGRF'MFNT/ACOP Fi G U::.GU 504 P.R1Me/TRAVFL/`FLR� 13A 76a.L0 044 1 EGAL NOTSCE/1'''A74WAV 7107 -?o 644 LEGAL. NOTYC!S/W.g1N "A 20,j, 0-:3 1,001,25 400 GOAD/sNdr a 0AP 110.20 U 90 M1 C SUF Fit TF G'/,:GTRE.tTO Gf .inti 207 ; U)Vf-L /,STRC Ely 1 G .4-5 210 OMYA.” 0019 RrNTAl. f'ti-C, 15.110, 710 Tk4VFl fY6J;FMINat`IFI A9C.2G 219 GN(:RIPf"O a4,4151)-33 ?10 AQ7�1. L�NF3�It1 Cl1L1J Y', 9'70,.?i, P$4 QONTAACT PAYMEN7 Gi-L..00 907 CLCANING Un/531-) L qA X0.14 T,VTA6 J^,Al2. Jlt lfcl 1, 9, ..Y. !ARC--'F'INA1iCIAL RYSCCM A /-0b/9'S 10.:23:57 W,obursement Journal CdAS.BANT LATE VENPOR LIQ1106 FGWD' DESCRIP TTON .Awou)VT' CLe2 1$T NAT SAND OF WNTICELLO 1 30P4 a'a./31,/98 U S WE4=1 GrDMML{NICATI 9000fl3 A0VFRTI'lIN4 27.60 1 9025 03/31/98 LICFER7 TRUCKING. 80001;, FRE WRT CN'ARGLS 1 3026 03/31/95 'Mr-tYWALL COMPANY 800065 KFY# 165.00 1 80'2.7 03/311195 GRIGGS, COOPER & CQM 800018 UOUOR g0Act4A`1E S. f33li,.1)3 4 3022 03/31/95 -GRIIWU. COOPER a COM 0000 P8 CREDIT/NINE PURCHASE W..5 r4R 6, 917 . J 11 3rHt; 1 3028 03191/95 •QUALIT'Y WINE 8 tPIRI 000040 L10110N PURCHA6E 4 , 01 .1. ". 1 6028 03/31/85 OUALITV Wk -WF & 5'PIRI 800040 MINE PURCHASE 534..0] 4, 500. ?!A 1 C07'0 03,%31/85 EA13LE WINE COMPANY 800012 WINE PlikCHASE 307.84 1 0030 63/11/95 GROSSLtIN iS'EVERAGE 100001;1 BEER PURC4ASE fJ. 334. Y6 1 809 1 n3/y3I/98 GRIGGS � CCFO**J R & C014 800010 LIQUOR PURCHAJE 4. 1 00 2 a -,/,1,/95 EAGLE vfm COMPANY QOoo12 nNE P'IJ cvvM ,,E 1 t�0i3 07/31%94 EAGtL Yalltl& CObiRAp1Y' 090912 MI --C t4f'RES FOR RE84tr_ 47,;07 C 90W 03,/31/95• QUA'LIT'V W.Iwe & SP.IRI 000040 LIOUOR 'PURCHA`SC boo 04 h0£ r1 93'i31/95 JOMN9014 B'ROO WHOLEGA 800022 LIQUOR PU6CKA�,E ?, 093.04 1 w)A 03/31/05 JOHN90N 91203 MHOLCSA 80002.2 WINE PURCHASE lk14 ! 1003 '03/01/90 RHXtXIP9 ttrNE 8, SPTO' 000100 HIND PUiKmAA3C 022.10 I0- 4 09'/31 /no PHIL lT.pq t17 t+lE 8 ;PER 000 too L+IQUnR PUR"A ;6, 00D.:) 1 1 0 302. A 1 y•_,' 1 ;' 07'/li105 6LRNICtt1G PEP&) COLA 600001 POP PU9QKACE 111C.s'0 C,00'.;7 09/:lll9G GU3iNun9 Risco -, 6©R 000DSi4 (j,`W, em,r,.CI{; Rimm Jf11.els) 00;);; 1'1-/-11/0G €W3COC3D'ATED COMM 01 0@01G:.' ADW RTIi.3,1'SG 40.2'1 `l1DJ'1 09/3'1/98 OAHLHFZMF.R O-TgTRTC;11T 000000 gLSR PORCHA131. !h,O? ..i1O UE/91%OG DAHtHt:TNt9 0114Rl(iit7 000600 N04 ALiGH01 IF Ill UR 7�.:rJ 1> a 140.:0 i• .. 11AY f)TS xllU1ING -UM 000010 RL t ;,OkCNA(d- '. 00'!0 tT 1".1l7G DAV UI"ii6'Ti.UTING C41M 00W)I11 NVA ALCOHQh3L.' CGA I% %0.46 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/05195 10:23:97 O.1sbu,r39mcnt dournai WAR-NANT GATE VENDOR O'F'SCP.IPTT'ON AMOUNT CLA 18iT NAT BANK OF 0ONTICELLO 10041 03:.34/95 DICK WHOLESALE CO... 000011 BEER PLIRCHA&E 2,725.'JO 14041 DS/31/'95 .DICK WHOLESALE .CO,., 800011 NON ALCOHOLIC SEC6 8@.':0 1'8041 03./8'1'/95 DICK WHOLESALE CO.. 000011 LIQUOR STORE t3U"LT'ES 32:SC 10042 03/3=1/95 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 000,017 WIt�i 'PURCHA'sE 1. 1:t:t, 14 18042 03/31/95 E'AOL£ WINE COMPANY 00001'1 t+IXFS, FOR RESALE 47.80 1.100.04 QCHf 10043 03/3'1/95 FLF=N'3 P'APEr1 SEFVI 000110 PAPER GAGO, yUPF4,El;3 1'P0.17 1.00114 03/31/,99 F OST CR—FRAN 2 E N -CA RL S 800015 LIO.UOR Llt.BIIITY 871.00 10045 03/3'1:/95 G '& K SP_RVICE 800111' ::'VG MATS'/MTC $F GL@ 41.70 10040 0313.1/95 GETTMAN COMPANY 800187 CHOY GLti z&55 FOE`' RE3AL 10.00 18041 03/31/95 dRTGG8,. COOPER E1: COM 00017'18 LI@U.OR PURCHA"d: 5,i103.Db 1'004C U3/)1/9S GROSSLErN P£YERAGE I 8'00019 SEER PURCHASE 8..$03.11) 1004"') 03/3'1%0,5 HOME JUICE 900138 JUICE GOR R9:3A1,L 12.90 100:,U OH/3'1,/05 JOHN,GON OROS WHOL ESA' 0000" tIQUOF PURCHASE2iA :42 1•t301,0 03/31%95' .JOHNSON E3'RO3 tfMOLESA 000022 W1NU PURCHADE 1,044..00 I001i1 03/31/95 JULIE CANO.Y & TODACCO' 000021 CI(3t? a' CI13AR3 FOR RES 3-30.50 1006? fig/3'1/05 LARLON'S AC£ HAROWAR 0001135 MI SC GP PL-llb 10.47 10.0') 03-131/05 MTNttLiklAECO 00018£ unt—I'TtF.O 100.7,1) 100r�4 09 JD 1/DEi MONTLTCELLO PRINTING 000057 OFFfibE WOPL1EC 24.42 tG10. , 40/31/09 KtjNTIC( Lb0 TINED 0'090.3,$ AfjW!k'TlrlW0 1.10.00 t 6'�£+ 07'/J 1/'15 Mit, 1TIdELL-0 YbMEG 000632• MD;dtlALLO llfgCv SUEtU !?b bb 104 .8p At':' i i iC16+:>>7 Cl9r' 11/n) NOC%THtRta G` AIE0 POVE 000035 UTj! IT11, IL4.f,i I C!)/.31/95 PAIL T,' > L 701) 103 WIN1: PgRCHAJ: 61.)11 U o_l. 1/OE. PH7LlIP5 WIt.0 A '.C7R 0011100 WANE Pl1FtCHAU :,CG, 16 *,1,1).111) 0;!11,170 PH.1J.L'(')i WINK. 8 :'4k .^.00100 MIX iJZ fzFoALC 61',.00 j 0 11 1/01/0D PHILLIP,': WINE: 0 C.P!R 000100 JUi:E 6 h'UGO FOG €.::A 3U".!,0 90t1`,Q ? , Ir.;t/^� PHtl.l, WINE G PIR 000100 !,' LI;IJiJR PUIiCHA15C t.Qif. .OG ORC r:NA?4t!AL SYSTEM 4/OS/9S 10:73:57 Ui�-Ourjno::rnt ;bmrnil WA.,MANT [SATE= VENDOR OES:CR'IPTIUN 7;AtillNl 41 A7 AG7 NAT BANK Of MONTICELLO taC59 03/31/95 QUALITY DINE @ -PIR7 BOD040 LIQUOR FUPCHALE 04.31 10050 03/31/95 QUALITY WINE 8 SPIRI 800040 WINfi PU;CHA5E i 78.1•'+ 34'-*C?.4C �CWIC I0050 03/3VS5 ROWS IC'E COMPANV 800041 ICF PURCkiA'3CC 173„0G '^061 03/31/95 07, CLOUD RESTAURANT 00005 LIQUOR STORE S9PPI 5 F$ 90.31r 18061 03/31/99 !3i. CLOUD RESTAUWANT 000048 MISC LIQUOR STOriC JUP ?1J.?' 10061 03/31/95 ST. rLOUO RESTAURANT 80004;, CLFANIN�; SUPPL1Et SP1 9b 1000P 03/31/95 THORPE 015TRIBUTING 00004'0 BEER PURCHASE 10002 03/3-1/05 Tt10Rrr DISTRIBUTING 000040 NOM ALCOHOLIC DC, Ct2 02.1)0 10,445.75 r .l1.0 10063 03./31/95 VIKING COCA--COLA DOT 800051 POP PURCHASF. 55J.G;i 1;T NAT BANK OF MONTTrELLO TOTAL 5,.C;47.3S C4 l