City Council Agenda Packet 05-08-1995AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, May 8, 1998 - 7 p.m.
Mayor. Brad Fyle
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the re
pp regular meeting held April 24, 1995. S�-� �
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
6. Public Hearing --Consideration of vacating storm water and utility easement
- Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Thomas Park Addition.
6. Consideration of a request to waive building permit fees for a house being
constructed for the Jacob Wetterling Foundation by Zaudtke Homes.
7. Consideration of adopting an ordinance amendment providing for interim
uses. Applicant, Jay Morrell.
8. Consideration of adopting an ordinance amendment establishing outside
storage and interim use in I.1 and I-2 zones. Applicant, Jay Morrell.
9. Consideration of granting an interim use permit to allow outside storage
and interim use at Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park. Applicant, Jay
Morrell.
10. Consideration of authorizing a sewer infiltration and inflow study.
11. Consideration of a request to reconsider carnival license application for
Monticello Mall.
12. Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance that
would amend Chapter 3-9 (C) by changing the sign setback minimum.
Applicant, Monticello Planning Commission.
13. Consideration of an ordinance amendment adopting 1994 Building Code.
14. Consideration of allowing construction activity from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. as
requested by Ryan Contracting.
Agenda
Monticello City Council
May 8, 1995
Page 2
16. Consideration of reviewing Trunk Highway 25 drainage study.
16. Consideration of adopting protective covenants and establishing lot prices
Eastwnod Knoll subdivision.
17. Consideration of authorizing the purchase of a 1 -ton bucket truck.
18. Consideration of approving the purchase of a new parks mower.
19. Adjournment.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, April S4, 1895.7 p.m
Members Present: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault
Members Absent: None
A221yval of minutes of the special meeting held April 10. 1995. and the McWar meeting
held April 10. 1995,
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY TOM PERRAULT TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING HELD
APRIL 10, 1995, AND THE REGULAR MEETING HELD APRIL 10, 1995, AS PRESENTED.
Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of adding items to the aegr}a.
A. �pnsideration of a rqsolution modifying the approval of the tax increment
f3nancine pian for Disgict 1-19 (Mississinvi Shores).
City Administrator Wolfsteller reported that HRA Attorney Steve Bubul is
recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution modifying the previously -
adopted resolution of March 13, 1995, that established the tax increment district
for the Mississippi Shores senior housing project. Bubul is concerned that
potential legislation being considered could affect the status of this TIF district;
therefore, he recommends adoption of this resolution prior to execution of the
redevelopment contract between the HRA, City, and Senior Housing Alliance.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED
BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE APPROVAL
OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR DISTRICT 1-19 (MISSISSIPPI
SHORES). Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 95-33.
B. CdLn
afilietation of application for a carnival license - Monticello Mall Merchantq
Association,
Administrator Wolfsteller reported that the Monticello Mall Merchants Association
has again applied for a carnival license for Chuck's Amusements to operate at the
mall parking lot for 13 days. They are also again requesting that the carnival fee
of $100 for the fust day and $b0 per day thereafter be waived.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED
BY CLINT HERBST TO APPROVE A CARNIVAL LICENSE FOR 8 CONSECUTIVE
Page 1 0—
Council Minutes - 4/24/95
DAYS AND WAIVE THE DAILY FEES PROVIDED THAT THE MALL'S DELINQUENT
UTILITY ACCOUNT IS PAID IN FULL. Voting in favor: Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst,
Shirley Anderson, Brian Stumpf. Opposed: Tom Perrault.
C. ggnsideration of setting a special Council meeting.
Assistant Administrator ONeill asked Council to set a special Council meeting
along with other city commissions to discuss the comprehensive plan update.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to set a special meeting for
Wednesday, May 3, 1995, at 7 p.m.
Citizen commentsket itions. requests. and complaints,
None.
Publip hearing on adoption of progosed asyespment roll for delinquent utility bills
certification of assessment roll to County Auditor.
Mayor Fyle opened the public hearing.
Administrator Wolfsteller noted that Council is asked to adopt an assessment roll for
utility billing accounts which are delinquent more than 60 days and certify the
assessment roll to the County Auditor. In addition to the delinquent amount, the $25
administrative fee has also been added to each account.
There heing no comment from the public, the public hearing was closed.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY CLINT HERBST TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS AND CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY
AUDITOR. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 95.28.
Consideratioq of arntndmertt to co0ditiena! use QErrr►it allowing a garden ceptor in a B 4
district. Apalicant. Cedar @1 et Carders Center.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Cedar Street Garden Center has applied
for an amendment to a conditional use permit originally issued to Fair's Garden Center
in 1989 for the purpose of relocating rock bins fiom the Broadway firontage to the
northeast comer of the site. The rock bins would be replaced with additional parking.
O'Neill noted that the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit based an the finding that the amended site plan will improve the
operation and appearance of the facility.
Pegs 2 �\
Council Minutes - 4/24/85
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY TOM PERRAULT TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BASED ON THE
FINDING THAT THE AMENDED SITE PIAN WILL IMPROVE THE OPERATION AND
APPEARANCE OF THE FACILITY. Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of aoorovine a ioint resolution aunrovine, annexation of the 160 -acre Klein
Farm site.
Assistant Administrator ONeill reported that the Township voted to sign the joint
resolution supporting annexation of the 160 -acre Klein Farm site at their April 10, 1995,
Board meeting. After City signatures are obtained, the annexation document will be
forwarded to the Minnesota Municipal Board for approval. ONeill noted that
annexation of the Klein property is contingent on execution of the development
agreement and approval of the final plat of the Klein Farms subdivision.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE A JOINT RESOLUTION APPROVING ANNEXATION OF
THE 160 -ACRE MIN FARM SITE. Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of aoarovin¢ final Plat and adoa'ng development aereement - Mein
Assistant Administrator OWeill reported that the final plat design for the Klein Farms
residential subdivision is consistent with the preliminary plat previously approved by the
City Council. He also noted that the development agreement is currently being reviewed
by the City Attorney.
Councilmember Herbst noted his concern regarding the City withholding development of
the park site for five years as noted in the proposed development agreement. Assistant
Administrator O'Neill stated that Tony Emmerich has agreed to a time frame of 2-3
years for park development.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM PERRAULT AND SECONDED BY
SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF THE KLEIN FARMS
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION CONTINGENT UPON FINAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY
ENGINEER, AND TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONTINGENT ON
REVIEW AND FINAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. Motion carried unanimously.
Assistant Administrator ONeill reported that on April 7, 1885, 13 bids were received for
the Klein Farms project ranging from a low of $1,097,583 to a high of $1,403,805. The
engineer's estimate for the project was $1,087,682. The low bid was submitted by Ryan
Contracting, Inc., who has worked on city projects in the past and has been found to be a
responsible bidder.
Page 3 9—
Council Minutes - 4/24/96
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY
SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
THE PROJECT TO RYAN CONTRACTING, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,097,593. Motion
carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 96.29.
10. Consideration of aourovine develonment agreement and final plat oLUardinal Hills.
phase V.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the development agreement for phase V of
the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision is nearly identical to agreements governing
previous phases of this development; however, the developer has not yet had a chance to
review the proposed agreement.
Steve Holker, one of the developers of Cardinal Hills, stated that Council could approve
the agreement contingent on the developer's acceptance of the agreement.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY CLINT HERBST TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONTINGENT ON
REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE
DEVELOPER, AND TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF CARDINAL HILLS, PHASE V,
CONTINGENT ON FINAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER. Motion carried
unanimously.
11. C2n,�idgratipn of a resolution accenting bids and awarding pmiect - Cardinal Hills.
phase V.
City Engineer Bret Weiss reported that on April 21, 1996, 12 bids were received. The
low bid was submitted by Kadlek Construction in the amount of $300,699.88. After
checking references, it was the City Engineer's recommendation to award the project to
Kadlek Construction.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY BRIAN STUMPF TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING THE
CARDINAL HILLS, PHASE V. PROTECT TO KADLEK CONSTRUCTION IN TME AMOUNT
OF 8300,699.88, CONTINGENT ON EXECUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 96-30.
1-TRUTIT! Me!
City Administrator Wolfsteller reported that six improvement projects are acheduled for
1996, and the City will need to sell bonds to finance the improvements. He noted it is
projected that the a projects will require financing needs of $3,890,000 to be paid back
over a period of 10 years. T'he bonds will cover the cost of constructing the following
improvements: Meadow Oak storm sewer outlet, Eastwood Knoll, Southwest Area
utilities extcnnion, Klein Farms, OcellorSchool Boulevard, and Car" Hills Phase V.
Page 4
3
Council Minutes - 4/24/95
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY
SH WZY ANDERSON TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SPRINGSTED, INC., TO
PROCEED WITH THE BOND SALE OF $3.890,000 AS RECOMMENDED WITH BIDS
RETURNABLE MAY 22, 1995. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 95-31.
13. Consideration of terms of sale - Outlot A. Country Club Manor - David Hornig.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the original proposal by David Hornig for
purchase of Outlot A, Country Club Manor, which included a purchase price of $282,000
and an amount of $3,000 per unit for owner -occupied units. Interest and term of
contract had not been determined at that time. He went on to explain the offer recently
proposed by City staff, which stated that the City would maintain the revenue from the
sign presently located on Outlot A, a purchase price of $303,150, an interest rate of 7.6%
on a 5 -year contract, and $3,000 per owner -occupied unit. Hornig's counteroffer called
for Hornig receiving the sign revenue, a purchase price of $303,160, with an interest rate
of 7% on a 10 -year contract, and $3,000 per owner -occupied unit. O'Neill also noted that
a third alternative would be to withdraw the offer and maintain ownership of the land.
Since it may be possible to sell the land at a higher price in the future, this alternative
may be the beat route.
David Hornig stated that he would be willing to negotiate his offer to an interest rate of
7.26% with a 6 -year contract. Councilmember Herbst added that perhaps the City could
collect and hold the sign revenue, which the City would keep if the project didn't develop
or would be used to write down the remaining amount Hornig owes the City when the
project does develop.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Brad Fyle to
approve the sale of the land to David Hornig at a purchase price of $303,150, an interest
rate of 7.26% on a 6 -year contract. Motion includes a closing date of June 1, 1995, and
the City to collect and hold the sign revenue to write down the amount owed by Hornig.
Voting in favor: Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle. Opposed: Shirley Anderson, Brian Stumpf,
Tom Perrault. Motion failed.
A MOTION WAS THEN MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN
STUMPF TO WITHDRAW THE SALE OF THE LAND FROM THE MARKETPLACE. Voting
in favor: Shirley Anderson, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault. Opposed: Clint Herbst, Brad
Fyle. Motion passed.
•S .f. ( 1 !1 i L 1 .! ' 1 1i t:1� • _!.' 1 : 1i ! 1
!V!/.1' K ':e 11'Ii .t 1i .1' =.!!v -!i '.!.! 117-111
City Administrator Wolfsteller reported that the liquor store operation continues to show
favorable results with sales increasing 6% over last year's first quarter results. The
gross profit has increased 5.8%, and the resulting operating not income shows a 13%
increase.
Council Minutes - 4/24/95
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to accept the liquor store first quarter
financial statement for 1995.
Liquor Store Manager Joe Hartman requested that Council consider approving a camera
security system for the liquor store. He noted that two quotes were received The first
quote was from Video Production Services proposing an 8 -camera system at a coat of
$7,860 and $200 for a VCR lock bo:, for a total of $8,050. The second quote was received
from Floyd Security for a similar system totaling $7,876. Hartman noted that he prefers
the system proposed by Video Production Services.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY TOM PERRAULT TO AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF AN 8 -CAMERA SECURITY
SYSTEM FROM VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES AT AN APPROXIMATE COST OF $8,050,
INCLUDING TILE VCR LOCK BOX AND A HIGH-QUALITY CAMERA FOR THE FRONT
DOOR OF THE STORE. Motion carried unanimously.
Hartman also requested that Council authorize expansion of the walk-in cooler by
creating an additional five doors for display of beer products and allowing an additional
400 cases to be placed in the cooler. He noted that it has been difficult to keep an
adequate amount of beer int the cooler during peak periods. The estimated cost of the
cooler expansion, including electrical hookup and carpentry work, is $16,000.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY TOM PERRAULT TO AUTHORIZE AN EXPENDITURE OF UP TO $16,000 FOR
EXPANSION OF THE WALK-IN COOLER AT THE MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE. Voting in
favor: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault, Opposed: Clint
Herbst.
16. Consideration of establishing a marketing strategy for Eastwood Knoll subdivision.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that at the previous Council meeting, staff was
asked to prepare additional information regarding alternatives for sale of the Eastwood
Knoll subdivision to interested developers and to also obtain proposals from realton to
market and sell the lots for the City. Following is a summary of the proposals received.
• The proposal received fivm Orrin Thompson included a down payment of $50,000
with revenue generated from the sale of lots amounting to $629,000. This amount
is $87,000 short of the $238,000 land value the City had hoped to recover Brom the
project.
• The proposal previously submitted by Vic Hellman was withdrawn.
Staff researched the possibility of exchanging the Eastwood Knoll property for a
220 -acro site owned by Tony Emmerich, which could then be used as a sludge
Page 6 (S)
Council Minutes - 4/24!95
deposit site; however, it was found that only 60-80 acres of the site would be
usable for sludge deposit. Therefore, no further efforts are underway to pursue
this exchange.
A proposal received from Tony Emmerich included a letter of credit equal to 25'%
of the improvement cost, or approximately $104,000, as a guarantee. The
purchase price would be $20,500 for each of the 33 lots, including a reduction of
$1,500 for four lots needing additional grading, for total of $670,500. Emmerich
also agreed to purchase a minimum of 5-7 lots each year.
Proposals were received from four real estate companies regarding marketing the
property. All four companies are able to provide the same services with some
variation in terms of commission.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY
TOM PERRAULT TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY DALE FLOREK OF EDINA
REALTY TO MARKET THE EASTWOOD KNOLL PROPERTY WITH A 1 -YEAR TERM.
Motion carried unanimously.
16. Consideration of nurchasinit a eas detector fo3-the sewer denartment.
Public Works Director John Simola reported that the City currently has two tri -gas
detectors in the sewer department, which are also used by many other departments.
Because some of the departments are without a unit for several days at a time, the
Sewer and Water Superintendent is recommending that the City obtain an additional
unit which will monitor four gases and will provide an additional level of safety for the
workers. A quote in Lite aumwtl of $1,640 was received from Davies Water Equipment
Company for the four -gas Neotronics meter.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY TOM PERRAULT TO AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF THE NEOTRONICS FOUR -GAS
METER FROM DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT COMPANY FOR $1,640. Motion carried
unanimously.
17. Consideration of change order Nl for City Pmiect 93-04C. Public Works Facility
Exuamion and Renovation. Phase Il.
Public Works Director Simola reported that two changes are needed in construction of
the public works facility expansion. The first change requires installation of slab
supporta for the front and south entrances at a cost of $600. These supports were
initially deleted Brom the plans during the redesign process, but it has been
recommended that they be installed. The second change involves installation of a two -
speed, three-phase heating and ventilation system and a 100 amp three-phase subpanel
at a cost of $1,785. The bids received included a single -speed, single-phase unit, which is
not available. The total coat of the change order is $2,268.
Page 7 (�i)
Council Minutes - 4/24/95
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY
SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER 01 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,265 FOR
ADDING TWO ENTRY SLAB FOUNDATIONS AND SWITCHING THE HEATING AND
VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR THE BAY AREA TO TWO -SPEED, THREE-PHASE. Motion
carried unanimously.
18. Consideration of adopting a resolutiog authorizine Oe fire department to enter intoLk
cooperative mutual aid agreement with other Wright County communities.
Administrator Wolfsteller reported that each community in Wright County is being
asked to consider adopting a resolution agreeing to join the Wright County Mutual Aid
Association for joint and cooperative use of fire personnel and equipment. He noted that
joining the Association does not increase the City's liability, and the new agreement will
replace some of the present agreements now in place with other communities.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY
SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MONTICELLO
JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE WRIGHT COUNTY MUTUAL AID
ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT. Motion carried unanimously.
SEE RESOLUTION 95-32.
19. Consideration of submitting a letter in response to the Buffalo Bituminous gravel njl
BAW
At the previous meeting of the City Council, township residents raised concerns
regarding the proposed development of a gravel pit and bituminous plant operatiuu
proposed by Buffalo Bituminous. The residents requested that the City send a letter to
the County addressing concerns about the operation.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE LETTER AS PROPOSED AND AUTHORIZED STAFF
TO SEND THE LETTER TO WRIGHT COUNTY. Motion carried unanimously.
20. Consideration of modify the mileage reimbursement rate for Council and emvloveeR.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM PERRAULT AND SECONDED BY
CLINT HERBST TO LEAVE THE CURRENT MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT RATE FOR CITY
COUNCIL AND CITY EMPLOYEES AT $.28 PER MILE. Motion carried unanimously.
21. Consideration of an ordinance amendment adopting 1994 baaildin code.
Building Official Gary Anderson reported that ibr the past six years, the City has been
using the 1988 Minnesota State Building Code as a guide lbr construction within the
city. Anderson requested that Council consider adopting the 1994 Minnesota State
Building Code. The most notable change is in residential construction requiring
additional smoko dctcctors and 4inch spacing for dcck rv:ling construction.
Page 8 0
Council Minutes - 4/24/95
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM PERRAULT AND SECONDED BY
SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO TABLE THIS ITEM PENDING FURTHER STUDY. Voting in
favor. Tom Perrault, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf. Opposed: Brad
Fyle.
22. Consideration of purchase of electric aretair (nlasma) cutter for the public works shot).
Public Works Director John Simola reported that in the past the public works
department has used an acetylene torch for cutting plate steel and aluminum, which
often warps sheet steel, is slow, and results in edges having to be ground to St properly
for welding. It is proposed that the public works department purchase an electric arc/air
(plasma) cutter, which is faster and provides a smooth cut.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY TOM PERRAULT TO AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF THE THERMAL ARC PAK MASTER 50
PLASMA CUTTER FROM CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INC., OF ST. CLOUD FOR $2,236.50.
Motion carried unanimously.
23. Consideration of accenting bid and awarding project - Pathwav nroiect.
City Engineer Bret Weiss reported that three bids were received on April 11, 1995, for
the proposed pathway project. The lowest bid was received from Buffalo Bituminous in
the amount of $406,076.55. The engineer's estimate for the project was $354,210. Weiss
noted that the ISTEA program will fund 80% of the total coat of the project, including
the 15% overrun over the estimate.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINE HERBST AND SECONDED BY
SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ACCEPT THE BIDS AND AWARD THE PROJECT TO BUFFALO
BITUMINOUS IN THE AMOUNT OF $406,076.65. Motion carried unanimously.
24. Consideration of authorizing feasibility study - Meadow Oak 4th Addition.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the City recently received a petition
requesting completion of a feasibility study for development of the Meadow Oak 4th
Addition, which is located between the existing Meadow Oak area and the Briar Oakes
development area, and consists of 12 platted Iota that currently do not have city sewer,
water, or road services. He noted that one of the reasons why improvements were never
completed is because a number of the lots are difficult to develop due to poor soils,
swamp, low elevation, etc.
O'Neill noted that staff is concerned that the pace of development in the city may
overtax sanitary sewer plant resources and that, according to the City Attorney, the City
is not obligated to complete the project via the public improvement process. In addition,
Page 9 9
Council Minutes - 4/2M95
due to the late arrival of the application, the project was not included in the bond issue
already adopted by the Council; therefore, the City would need to bond separately to
acquire funds for the project, which would be expensive for such a small project.
City Engineer Weiss added that the Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted to
evaluate the wetlands in the area before authorizing this project.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY
TOM PERRAULT TO TABLE THIS MATTER PENDING RECEIPT OF ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION. Motion carried unanimously.
26. Consideration of bills for the month of ADR1
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED
BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE BDI.S FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL AS
PRESENTED. Motion Carried unanimously.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Karen Doty
)Moe Manager
Pegs 10 C;L)
Council Agenda - 6/8/95
s. Public Hearina—C9nsidpratiop of vacating worm walqr pnd utift
2psen3ens on Lots9 and 10. Black 1. ThomasJELark Addition. which
would allow Lots 9 and 10 to merge. W.O.)
A- REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Morton Buildings is interested in constructing a facility on Lots 9 and 10,
Block 1, Thomas Park Addition. In order to build the facility as proposed,
the two lots must be merged into one. In order to merge the lots, the
easements between the lots must be vacated.
City staff has reviewed the site and finds no reason to deny the request.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve vacation of storm water and utility easement on
Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Thomas Park Addition, which would allow
Lots 9 and 10 to merge.
2. Motion to deny approval of a request to allow the vacation of storm
water and utility easement on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Thomas Park
Addition, which would allow Lots 9 and 10 to merge.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative •1.
Copy of plat map showing subject properties and easements to be vacated.
THOMAS'
PARK
�
"I i/
��OJ moo^ �e0 ed yo
1 Y iqe
�Ss.90 S4000
r
I n,era,�e N��h�Or
so �SSg, 69 ,
1Y,
en
m
Z 10 cc
�; m �o
?+I ol ,n0
O ( MO
N
12
L150.'O'O-.__1 150.00—•••1
o x
DRIVE ! 0.00
1& 00 -- : o , . _ -'
HIGO'W
AY
LOCATION MAP
TROHAS PAU
Lots 9 and 10
aae 1-94Tip
I "PL.
Cl
RD
Council Agenda - 6/8/95
6. Poxiddiarption of a request to svaiyq jnpudin-F Hermit [eels for a new
hones bean¢ gonercted in liivQ; Mill for the Jacob WetterLing
Foundation--Zaudtke Home Builders. (R.WJ
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
One of the new home builders within the River Mill development this
summer will be Zaudtke Homes out of Brooklyn Park. This is their fust
entry into the Monticello market; and as one of their first model home
projects, they plan on building their model home with the intention of
selling the home and donating the proceeds to the Jacob Wetterling
Foundation. This is a project that Zaudtke Homes started last year in
Brooklyn Park that generated approximately $60,000 in proceeds for the
Jacob Wetterling Foundation. In a nutshell, Zaudtke Homes was the
general contractor for the project and solicited donated materiels and
donations of subcontractor labor, along with a reduced land value price, that
enabled them to keep the construction costs at a minimum, allowing the
$60,000 to be available for the ultimate donation to the Foundation.
Since they are continuing with this idea in 1995, they would like their
model home to be available for the fall Parade of Homes schedule and are
requesting the City consider a contribution to the project by agreeing to
waive the normal building permit fees for this home. The City of Brooklyn
Park last year agreed to waive the building permit fees. Mr. Dean Zaudtke
will be in attendance at the meeting to finiher explain the project to the
Council. Some of you may have heard of this project last year, which
apparently received tremendous support firom both suppliers of materials
and from Zaudtke Home Builders' subcontractors. Mr. Zaudtke indicated
that they were excited about doing the project again this year and picked
Monticello as the site for this special home not only because of their
involvement in River Mil:, but also because the home would be closer to
St. Joseph, Minnesota, and the Wetterling family.
B. AL
Council could agree to participate in this worthwhile project by
agreeing to waive all building permit fees associated with this house.
It is my understanding the initial request is for waiving the building
permit fees, and we did not discuss whether this would also apply to
any other charges such as sewer and water hookup fees, sewer and
water area charges, etc.P etc.
14
no not waive any Minding permit (eAR aasrrintM with 04 m. jest.
Council Agenda - WM5
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
From a public relations standpoint, I believe the staff is in agreement with
the request for waiving of the building permit fees for this special project
being spearheaded by Zaudtke Homes. With most of the materials and
subcontractors donating their labor, it seems quite appropriate for the City
in which this project is located to also waive the building permit fee. As I
noted earlier, no request was made regarding other utility charges, and I
assume that these would still have to apply to the project.
D SUPPORTING DA,&:
None.
Council Agenda - 5M5
Qonsideration gf adopting an ordinance amendment or�yidline for
Interim uses, Aoollicant. Jay Morrell. AND
Conga j1eradoa of adopting an ordinance amendment epta�jishinw
outside storage and interim use in I.1 and 1-2 zones. AoolicanL Jay
tM nell. AND
Considerati9P of granting an interim use _get mit tq @How oulkli jAe
_q jgEWe and intVin use al Jot 2. B)jgp_15 8.Oakwood Inigstrial Park.
Algnllcant. Jay Morrell. (J.0.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
See Planners report, Planning Commission draft meeting minutes, and
supplemental information.
B, ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Decision One—Conelderation of adopting an ordinance amendment
providing for interim uses.
L Motion to adopt an ordinance amendment providing for interim uses
based on information contained within the planner's report.
Under this alternative, a provision for allowing interim uses is
established which creates the opportunity for establishing interim
uses for each zoning district on a case-by-case basis. See Planner's
report for rationale supporting this choice.
2. Motion to deny establishment of an ordinance providing for interim
uses based on the finding that establishment of an interim use
provision is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan.
If Council selecta this alternative, then decisions two and twee
become moot.
Decision Two --Consideration of adopting an ordlnenae amendment
establishing outside storage and interim use in I.1 and 1.2 zones.
1. Motion to adopt an ordinance amendment establishing outside
storage as an interim use in an I.2 zone based on information
contained within the planner's report and based on the finding that
the storage of trucks and trucking equipment in the I.2 district is
appropriate as a temporary use of property until such time as the
highest and best use of the property dictates otherwise.
Council Agenda - 5W5
An interim use approach would permit the City to control the
secondary effects of outdoor storage, as well as to work with the
property owner toward the eventual cessation of the storage and a
permanent use of the property.
Under this alternative, a provision for allowing outside storage in an
I-2 zone is established which creates the opportunity for M & P
Transport to store materials on vacant property on an interim basis.
2. Motion to deny adoption of an ordinance amendment establishing
outside storage as an interim use in an I-2 zone.
Council should select this alternative based on a finding that
establishing outside storage in an I-2 zone is not consistent with the
comprehensive plan and would become a detriment to the district due
to the inconsistency of the use with the character of the I-2 district.
Decision Three -Consideration of granting an interim use permit to
allow outside storage and interim use at Lot 2, Block a Oakwood
Industrial Park.
Motion to grant an interim use permit to allow outside storage as an
interim use at Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park, under the
conditions as identified by the Planning Commission. Motion is based
on the finding that the proposed interim use is consistent with the
comprehensive plan and the character of the area in which it is
proposed. The interim use must conform to the following conditions.
1. The interim use must conform to requirements as identified by
ordinance.
2. The term of the interim use is five years from the date of
approval.
3. The front yard setback for the storage area shall be at mid-
point on the property (sppro: 300 R). The side yard setback
shall be 30 it
4. Materials shall be stored as far to the rear of the site as
possible.
Motion to deny approval of the interim use request.
Q.STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission and staff recommend alternative 91 under decisions
one through three.
D, SUPPORTING DATA
Planners report; Proposed ordinance amendment establishing interim use
provision; Proposed ordinance amendment establishing outside storage as
an interim use in an I.2 zone.
FPR -13-1955 1602 WIC 61Z 555 5637 Fl. WS/ 12
KA Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
C URBAN PLANNING • DESIGN . MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Jeff O'NeW
FROM:
liWwd MctAuOWSmphen Gd=an
DATE:
13 April 1995
RE.
MOntiaIIo - Interim Use Ordmmm
FIM NO:
191.06 - 95.03
BACKGROUND AND Rffi+F3LENC6
Recently. the City has been approached by a laadoaoer (MrSW Moaelp to allcw the amp
of trucks and ttailen on an mdostdal parcel u a pdmIcipl use of property. The Taring
Ordina= does not t mudy have such a use, and the highest and best use of this parcel is
Clearly a more unease fadaanisl unw. However, a specific use may be appmpdate for a limkted
time until the attimane use Can be realize& Thls memorandum will aatllne the Cddcal fm2m
which carinal interim uses and allow for their effecdve implemmration
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIM
Control Condmana. the City of Mnn ictUo Zoning Ordbmm does not have any stated
oondideaa fbr interim uses wtddn spedfle zonW dimfas. A teeeat mgaert by a landowner of
an WdastrW parcel to use the land for odor thm the petmimed or cotWhiamal uses spetdflod
brought to the attention of the City the posdhitity of scoozzustodidn uses of Ind an a temporary
basis. U it an be shown tbat the no was not wtth the aro of smnxmdb:g
Properties, or catdNcr with the long term ,., •..,,,.,,. , bhtetesrs specified by the City's
C=Wmbmdve Plan, an interim ase approach may be eppropaI—
ID light of the roceat request, the City o Wd choose to deny the apptia"m permit the use
thwugh an ordWaaro amemdm— or b=Kk= interim uses. Tbls refit„ s an
amid— to the Zoning Ordinance, t md&:&Uy the Aftfalstmdost section, and ythe Badnew
Dludct Provislam section, Subd. 16, I-2, Heavy lr4istrW, to Include ..... criteria
regudLog the implemm adon of interim uses.
5775 Wayzata Blvd • StAte 555 • SL LOUS Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595-9836•Fax. 595.9837
Purpose and Intent. The underlying purpose of allowing a specific use within a desigm2md
zoning district is to ensure the owner of a spedflc parcel, neighbotmg property owners, and the
City, a predictable level of activity and impact expected from use of that specific patzeL Par
this reason, no uses are allowed other than those specified by the Zoning Ordinance as
permitted, accessory, or conditional.
On occasion, however, the City may discover ceztam uses for a propeay which an temporary
in nature, serve a specific function in a designated location, and offer lade, if any, demmeutil
effects to ndghboatng landowners. In the pan of a particular use on a sped8c property amt
a permanent bxadon for that use can be found, or a use which will be rplaced with anticipated
development or redevelopment eodorming to the permitted, =essory, or conditional ares of
the zoning distant, or a use reflective of the long range development goals of the arra, allowing
that use on a temporary basis may be a beneficial development strategy. In mch cases. all
paries recogmae the temporary oato of mcb a use, and that at —f -don of the hued- =a
permit, the specified use will u miaam, mku otherwise reinstated by the City.
P rocedwre and Cvenaml Standuds. With regard to processing of interim use permits, them
are two conditions which apply. The first is a' ring' condition, in which an adsdsg
legal or legal non-eoaforming in -dm use is caaaidewd allowable and treated wom ing to the
esisdng standards and as an interim nae in a speeii$ed zoning district The second condition is
wbrm a new interim use, allowable in the zoning daft as sack, is applied for. Under inch
a dwatian the application is processed similar to the pmoodrua and standards asmdated with
a condidoul use permit to ensure the integrity of the ase in the specified zoning d rilct and that
the use will not impose any additional btudea on the City or neighboring proper
Teminatina. Perbaps the most dgaiflcam component of an interim use is its specified
taminatioa Without a tuuminadon dare, a specified land use is understood to be pesmanmt,
whether It is a permitted or conditional use in the dlsudcc h may be that a vidatlm of the nae
permit candirian•. a change in the City's Zoning Ordinance, or redevdopmem of the ase
property reader the Interim use permit tamitsated 1 ft the spedfied terminadon dna.
However, baring such conditions, the property owner can aspect the inter}- me permit to
expire on a specified date. At that time, =timed acdvity an such a property would be
considered nornonfotming and possibly ifiegel, unless otherwise specM by the City.
Interim Un in an Industrial Zoning Dhtdct. The City of MnadaAo is caTeady eouddedng
a request by a landowner to provide outdoor suaaage of Wieb and trucking egtripm— on a
parcel zoned for iaduatrtal davelopmcat. Tb adQten this mquest, as well u nay when evhloh
may be applied to the I-2 Zoning District. the fisadamnotal purpose of the z0ft dhnrlct -net
be preserved.
The timdamemal purpose of the I-2 Diana is to prwido building sines for heavy brmusnial
activity removed froom the leas intensive activity of residemtW and commercial land Mm
Outdoor storage of vehicles and owes= dna not constba the higbest and bat use of this
property. However, became a vscart iodoste al lot may be the most appropriate Plato to stone
vchicla and equipment until a more suitable site is located, an imerim use permit for this
purpose may be considered a desirable alternative to leaving the land vacant until an industrial
building and use is proposed for the rice.
An interim use permit for autdoctr storage of trucks and trucking cgnipmeat ahoald include the
following moons:
1. The permit.would ld be amended to the property owner for a of yenta
agreed upon by the landowner and the City under a development contract At
cerminaticn, the landowner may apply for another races- on permit however, both
the landowner and the City will be regrmed to assess the ....� ...r ..-.j Contest of the
application and demonim whether gating another h—Im use permit Is is the best:
interest of the City and neighboring propatq owners.
2. The fates- use permit would require the appliaot to mat the applicable
of Chapter 3, Sectio 2, Ckenaal Building and Pedumaoce Requirements, atmitar to the
requfrezu= necessary to receive a conal use permit In this district.
3. 'rhe Interim use permit would include as a condition of approval prob2tting pairing of
miles.
4. The interim use permit would require a gravel unface, suitable far outdoor storage, and
teioforeing the temporary nature of the use on this she.
S. The interim use permit would require visual screening in complianeo with Cbapter 3,
Section 2.G of the Zoning Ordinance regarding fencing, la g, and screening. Of
particular sigoitieance is the screeaing's opacity and use of as 1 phtndng as a
component of the craning. The ermem of the screening and necessary investment by
the landowner should be at the disc:tft of the City. However, aha conditions agreed
upon shwld be documented as a oompoora of tffi issued pewit.
6. The interim use permit would require any faxing and storage of trucm ad equipment
to comply with the seft& conditions of C:hapoer 3, Section 3 of the City's Zamiog
Ordicaum For the 'I-2' Zoning D4tdct, all fencing and storage dmU bave a 30 foot
mhrisnem tion[ and :ear yard sesback sad 30 font minimum We yard suuback L
The eamdidoua mumu above apply to the �adfic use of -Ic ,1 shuage Lor truxd<a and
trucking equipment If the City finds there are other types of storap tun to be included in thin
section, specific conditions may be required of them as well. Howaver, the gc=ml inamt of
bmwiiag visually attractive, am"bausive land uses wlddn the industrial diffiet abonld be
Pf R-13-1555 1603 NX bl d » 5wf r. ors iz
CONCLUSION
In response to the City of Monticello's interest in euabHshing an interim = compown: to their
Zo�ag Ordinance, our office has lofted such an or 11 -P P. This atdinaza seeps to awdc}pau
... � of the City to acwmmodate special conditions which wattsat an interim use
permit, while at the am time ant>dpatin potential adverse effects of such uses ors the diudct
in which they act: allowed. The City should estahlisb the of the
izae use permit procedure, stleh that h tetim um may be htc>oded m individual zoning
districts when the teed or denim is warmed.
Under the City's Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission is to consider five betas in its
consideradca of an ame'IIdrutstt The Planning Coon fs to then maim a finding of Let and
.........,..,t . ,.,. to the City Council regarding the proposed a The }live facmrs are
as follows:
L Belath�lp to the C...... Pbm
The interim use of outdoor amp for trucks and nttdotng equipm, if it a&= to the
conditions described in the ordinance, will nrppott the it1puflon d the Cave
Plan to maintain an attractive, functional 1-%-4a1 pas! in Mooduilo.
2. Geographic area involved in the request.
The outdoor storage of uacb and tracking egaipmem is oommAle with the oedioary D
activities of the ird—Hal pads In which the hmedm use is proposed.
J. Tendency of the proposal to depredate the aces.
It is highly uWamly that the proposed use followhV required camp fortppmd wM
depreciate the vahm of adghbctdng properties in the Z-2', Savy Irtda-421 Unto
District
4. Chasrds of the surramiliq atm.
The locadoa for the proposed iatedta ase hu the frock acd ty and amemomy aaMoor
am:age typical of fm�al p *L The btcbWm of in an is typical
of induttfal pules. The forlodon of as outdoor smogs pity dedicsoed to tmcb and
truddmg equipment is highly =op ffhle with the character of the ma.
S. r ......... i nand for the use,
The landowner has did an fnaAdw area an the edstog lot bdng used fir
tauldog business activity. Therefore. addidamd Lend hr stooge of track and mteklog
equdpmesr would allow Santer utility of the landowmers lot with a pmotmod use.
4
RPR -13-1955 1603 NFC bu» zji r. ww ac
In reviewing the request by Mr. Morrell, the City has three options for response:
First, the City may choose to deny the regacst� ismiag a findings of fact which sinter the
proposed no is not in the best interest of the City or adjacent bndownen. The City may
d—r-1— that it is in their best ino test to ptusae a pemtaaeat use and banding development
program for the property, and to leave the land vacant until such time a pezzaffied or rnadittoaal
land use is prtrposed.
Second. the City may choose to define the proposed use as a penaimed or conditional use in the
Z-2' Zamtg District, fanning a fiediogs of fact which states the proposed ase Is desimble and
non-obtsative in this distzict an a perm basis. Ile City may determine that the storage of
troch and trucking cod== is compatible with the taduandal cituacter of the district and
d=cfcae in the bast interest of the City, titin use any be classified as permitted at coronal.
Finally, the City may choose to dc9ine the riegoea as an fated- no in the 11-21, Ill
District. In this case, the namiag clasmiczihra world accommodate a WNW . .., of
temporary namm This action would have the effect of pe>mitdng a use on a property which
would ordinarily remain vacant until a permaacec use could be eaahlidwA More Vociffcalty,
the potential to use a site in an established iadaatial district for the storage of trxIm and
mucking eguipatem„ would .....:._.-5.- the temporary needs of the landowner without
providing adverse impacts to the City or adjacent laadowtaa.
it i, the L,'.
- of our office to adopt an oedimnce which permits interim uses in
zoning dist>Irts, provided they are developed and maintained for nonrobtruda activities. In
addidam, our office ., the inclusion of outdoaz sooage for tracks and trucking
equipment as an Interim use in the '1-2', Heavy Industrial Zoning District.
To this end, we have provided a Draft Onlinacce to three sections for the City's review. 'he
first action amends the title of Chsptm 22 of the MoadceIIo Zoning Ord matte to kma'trde
Interim Uses. The second sectiom amends Cktapter 22 to luclude the administradon of interim
uses accaniing to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. The third section smtatds Chfpoer 16. '1-
2-, Reavy Industrial District standards to include outdoor storaga of treys ad wzkb g
equipment. and the mnditiOas under which it may be approved.
It is our ktrtearicm by providing tho previous Imre discussion and the iia Ordb= that the
City of Momticdlo will have the aearsary info n by which an dlective P maybe
delivered to Mr. Marell's request
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN THAT THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE BE AMENDED
TO INCLUDE AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS PROVIDING FOR
INTERIM USE PERMITS AS FOLLOWS:
THE I TL.E OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING
ORDINANCE SHALL BE AMENDED TO READ:
Administration - Amendments, Conditional Use Permits, and Interim Use
Permits
SECTION 88.4, INTERIM USE PERMIT, SHALL BE ADDED TO
CHAPTER 22, ADMINISTRATION - AMENDMENTS, CONDITIONAL USE
PERMITS, AND INTERIM USE PERMITS, OF THE MONTICELLO
ZONING ORDINANCE TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
22.4: INTERIM USE PERMIT
[A] PURPOSE AND INTENT: The purpose and intent of allowing
interim uses is:
To allow a use for a brief period of time until a permanent
location is obtained or while the permanent location is under
construction.
To allow a use that is presently judged acceptable by the City
Council but that, with anticipated development or
redevelopment, will not be acceptable in the future or will be
replaced in the future by a permitted or conditional use allowed
within the respective district.
To allow a use which is reflective of anticipated long-range
change to an area and which is in compliance with the
comprehensive plan provided that said use maintains harmony
and compatibility with surrounding uses and is in keeping with
the architoctural character and design standards of existing
uses and development.
[B] PROCEDURE:
Existing Uses: Uses defined as interim uses which presently
exist as a legal use or a legal nonconforming use within a
respective zoning district shall be considered approved and
shall be treated as allowable uses. —
7 -?F
Ordinance Amendment No.
Page 2
2. New Uses: Uses defined as interim uses which do not
presently exist within a respective zoning distract shall be
processed according to the standards and procedures for a
conditional use permit as established by Chapter 22 of this
ordinance.
[C] GENERAL STANDARDS: An interim use shall comply with the
following:
1. Existing Uses: Shall be in conformance with zoning and
building standards in effect at the time of initial construction
and development and shall continue to be governed by such
regulations in the future.
2. New Uses:
a. Meets the standards of a conditional use permit set forth
in Section 22-3 of this chapter.
b. Conforms to the applicable performance standards set
forth in Chapter 3, Section 2, of this zoning ordinance.
C. The use is allowed as an interim use in the respective
zoning district.
d. The date or event that will terminate the use can be
identified with certainty.
e. The use will not impose additional costa on the public if
it is necessary for the public to take the property in the
future.
f. The user agrees to any conditions that the City Council
deems appropriate for permission of the use.
[D) TERMINATION: An interim use shall terminate on the happening of
any of the following events, whichever first occurs:
1. The date stated in the permit.
2. Upon violation of conditions under which the permit was
issued.
3. Upon change in the City's zoning regulations which renders the
use nonconforming.
6--
9G
Ordinance Amendment No.
Page 3
4. The redevelopment of the use and property upon which it is
located to a permitted or conditional use as allpwed within the
respective zoning district
SECTION 16.8, DMM M USES, SHAILL BE ADDED TO CHAPTER 1% "1-2;
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
16.6: INTERIM USES: The following are interim uses in an "1-2' District
(requires an interim use permit head on the procedures set forth in and
regulated by Chapter 22 of this ordinance):
[A] Outdoor storage of trucks and trucking equipment, provided that:
1. A specified termination date is documented
2. The applicable requirements of Chapter 3, Section 2, General
Building and Performance Requirements, are met.
3. The permit prohibits the parking of automobiles.
4. The permit specifies a gravel surface, suitable for the parking
of trucks.
b. The permit specifies that the intensity of visual screening shall
be related to the location and nature of the storage and the
duration of the interim use.
6. The permit specifies that appropriate setback of necessary
fencing and/or setback of storage shall be related U the
location and nature of the storage and the duration of the
interim use.
Adopted by the Monticello City Council ori the 8th day of May, 1996.
Mayor
City Administrator
Planning Commission Minutes - 3/07/95
piecuss "Offsite outside storaee in I-1 and 1-2 zones.
At the previous meeting, the commission tabled action providing specific
direction to Jay Morrell with regard to designing an ordinance amendment
that would allow off-site outside storage in an industrial zone.
Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator, explained the different approaches for
the commission to review.
1. Adopt an ordinance that allows outside storage to occur as a
conditional use in an I-2 zone (currently it is allowed only as an
accessory use).
2. Adopt an ordinance amendment that allows outside storage as an
accessory use on a parcel other than the parcel on which the principal
use is occurring.
3. Adopt an ordinance that allows outside storage as an interim use.
4. Other alternatives the Commission may decide upon.
5. The Planning Commission may decide that the ordinance is fine the
way it is an reject the notion of providing any guidnna+ to Morrell to
assist him in designing an amendment to the code. Under this
alternative, Morrell would prepare a zoning ordinance amendment for
review at the next meeting of the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission would review and make recommendations to
Council for review at the Bret meeting of the City Council in March
Enforcement action would be initiated at such time that the Council
acts to deny the ordinance amendment necessary to legally support
Morrell's use of the land.
Enforcement action has been delayed based on the advice of the City
Attorney. It is his view that the City should first determine whether or not
to change the ordinance to allow the use before taking le action. He has
noted that the culmination of the legal action will occur after the decision
on the zoning ordinance amendment is made; therefore, it would be
premature to take legal steps at this time.
Steve Grittman, City Planner, explained that it is possible to change the
ordinance in just one district. The Commission could allow interim use in
the industrial areas only. The city ordinance does not handle this as
parking because trailers are storage - they cannot be driven away.
Planning Commission Minutes - 3/07/96
Jay Morrell, owner of M & P Transport, stated he did not know if storage of
trailers would be storage or parking. Morrell thought a conditional use
permit with stipulations such as screening, would be acceptable. The
problem with an interim permit would be the time limit. The time the
storage will be needed is not known because the economy will dictate the
expansion of the business.
The commission discussed the advantages and disadvantages of using
conditional use permits verses interim permits. The interim permits could
work well because a time limit could be used to end the use. This type of
permit has been legal for four years and are typically used for non-
conforming uses. There vas some concern that the permit would be hard to
revoke. With the conditional use permits, conditions can be attached but
these conditions would need to be enforced by the dty. If violated the
ordinance states that violations of conditional use permits are treated as
misdemeanors and would need to be handled by the sheriff office.
RICHARD CARLSON MADE A MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO ASSIST
JAY MORRELL IN PREPARING HIS APPLICATION FOR AN
AMENDMENT THAT WOULD ALLOW OFF SITE STORAGE IN AN I-2
ZONE. SECONDED BY DICK MARTDE. Motion passed unsinirn usly.
Planning Commission Agenda - 2/7/95
8 . Consideration of alternatives for 4gvelooment of a zoning ordinance ®b
amendment that would allow vehicle storage or narking at a
location other than the princinal use. Analicant. Jav Morrell. (J.OJ
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
A few weeks ago, City staff discovered that Jay Morrell, owner of M & P
Transport, was parking/storing vehicles and trailers on property recently
purchased from the Oakwood Partnership. The lot purchased for vehicle
parking is located some distance from the M & P offices or "principal use."
This practice is not allowed under our current ordinance. Under the
current ordinance, parking and/or storage is allowed as an accessory use.
An accessory use is not allowed without a principal use. In other words,
parking lots and storage areas cannot be developed without an associated
business operation on the same site.
Morrell was notified of the violation accordingly. In response to the
notification, Morrell has requested that the City consider amending the
zoning ordinance in a manner that would allow storage to occur at a
location other than the location of the principal use. Morrell has not offered
a specific ordinance amendment because there are a number of approaches
that could be made to accomplish Morrell's goal. It, therefore, makes sense
to review the various approaches with the Planning Commission to
determine the best approach prior to submittal of a formal application
request for a zoning ordinance amendment.
Planning Commission will be provided with a verbal report fiiom Steve
Grittman regarding possible alternatives for development of zoning
ordinance amendments that would allow storage nr parking of vehicles at a
location other than the principal use. Jay Morrell will be applying for an
ordinance amendment based on the Planning Commission conversation and
discussion of the matter.
Following are different approaches that will be reviewed at the meeting in
more detail.
Adopt an ordinance that allows outside storage to occur as a
conditional use in an I-2 zone (currently it is allowed only as an
accessory use).
Adopt an ordinance amendment that allows outside storage as an
accessory use on a parcel other than the parcel on which the principal
use is occurring.
Planning Commission Agenda - 2/7/95
Adopt an ordinance that allows outside storage as an interim use.
Under this alternative, an ordinance amendment would need to be
developed that would allow short-term or interim use of land in a
manner that is not consistent with the zoning ordinance. Morrell
would be allowed to use the property for storage for a limited number
of years and be required to screen the storage area.
4. Other alternatives???
Planning Commission may decade that the ordinance is fine the way
it is and reject the notion of providing any guidance to Morrell to
assist him in designing an amendment to the code. Under this
alterative, Morrell would prepare a zoning ordinance amendment for
review at the nest meeting of the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission would review and make recommendation to
Council for review at first meeting of the City Council in March.
Enforcement action would be initiated at such time that the Council
acts to deny the ordinance amendment necessary to legally support
Morrell's use of the land.
Please note that enforcement action has been delayed based on the
advice of the City Attorney. It is his view that the City should first
determine whether or not to change the ordinance to allow the use
before taking legal action. He has noted that the culmination of the
legal action will occur after the decision on the zoning ordinance
amendment is made; therefore, it would be premature to take legal
steps at this time,
Planning Commission is asked to review Grittman'e report and the options
above and provide Morrell with guidance as to development of a zoning
ordinance amendment. The ordinance amendment would be reviewed at the
meeting in March.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff has no firm recommendation at this time. Me do believe that the
existing ordinances limiting off-site storage and perking are important.
Changes to it should not be taken lightly.
P. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of all correspondence with Jay Morrell regarding this situation.
250 Eau Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Mondcdlo, MN
55362-9245
Phone•. (612) 295-2711
Meso: (((66fi12)) 333.-55773399
Fax f1Ir1 2Jay MomII
MP Transport
Boz 477
1401 Fallon Avenue
Monticello, UN 86362-0477
RE: Storage of Semi -Trailers on Block 3. Lot 2
Oakwood Industrial Paris Addition. City of Monticello
Dear Mr. Morrell.
December 22, 1994
I noticed today that you have created a driveway aeesse to Lot 2 and as currently storing some semi-
trailers in the back southeast earner dBlock 3, Lot 2, Oakwood Industrial Park Addition in the City
of Monticello. The use of this lot for outside storage of these semi -Hailers in not an allowable use
within the zoning district do;mation far this lat,1.2 (heavy industrial) zoning without a prindple use,
that being some type of a building. If a building was constructed there first then outside storage is
only allowed as a conditional use in the 1-2 (heavy industrial) zoning. You have two options with
regards to addressing this matter. They an as follows;
Remove the ettatina ssmi-Hailers and remove the culvert for the driveway
with a fill material over it. This wont is to be completed within 10 days upon
receipt of this letter or this matter will be toned over to the City Attorney fbr
8uther action.
Submit a completed appllcadoo fbr an mdtnsnee amendment to allow oataide
storsgs in an I.2 (heavy in fas riM zoning a an allowable an without a
prindple ass, (a building atroeta7) on the sits Use of the property fbr outside
storage would depend an the results of the seting ordinance amendment
Prate
Remove the ezLstinQ semi -t ailats and remove the calwQt for the driveway
with a fill material over iL 'lois worst is to be completed within 30 days upon
receipt of this letter or this matter will be tuned aver to the City Attorney fbr
author action.
Mr. Jay Morrell
December 2' 1994
Page 2
B. Develop a principal ase on site and sambit a fequa for a omdidonel use
permit allowing open and outside atnuge. In omajmedou wfih prepartion and
review of building pleas. submit an applimden ihr a e1 we request
to allow open and outdoor starega in an I-2 ihsarf iadussriaA sorts.
Also, The metal culvert which is cmtewJy placed in the rWa-d-wsy for the drivsavq sso ess to this
lot mast meet City design criteria.
You wiIl have 10 days aeon receipt of this Jetty to remove the --;sd sad4:alen and the metal
culvert with the fill material over it Pram Block 9. Lot 2, Oakwood Iadnetrial Penh A,ddifina in the City
of Montleello. Failure to remove both Sam this lot will rank to turning thb math ova to the City
Attorney for @anther --d—
If yon, should have any gaeatl-as ple" feel Pas to contact ma
Sincerely.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
�GA
ee Rick Wolbuiler, City Administrator
Jeff O'Neill. Assistant City A
John Simols, Public Works Directar
Paul Weingarde4 City AMn-xwy
Brat Weiss, City &agfn-a
Brad Pyle. Mgyor
0
Ll
D
M
U�190
144
N A P TPAtSPBAT. OIC
December 27. 1994
M 3 P TRANSPORT, INC.
Phone -(810 2930122
MKM - (810 =4740
Pax .(612) 3M?, 8
ALEXANDRIA CONCRETE CO.
Phone -(612) 763}a800
Fox . (6121 7115-4676
Gary Anderson, Zoning Administrator
City of Monticello
290 East Broadway
PO Box 1147
Monticello, MN 33362-9245
O]N6AEIE PRODUCTS OF N6N LONDON. INC.
PMM • (812) 0SA,7911
CONCRETE OF MORRIS, INC.
Play - (MZ 6n4M
wADERA READY -MDI
Pinna - 08)611.1338
Fax -(614761./676
I am in receipt of your letter dated December 22, 1994 regarding
our use of Block 3, Lot 2. Oakwood Industrial Park.
I am in disagreement with you regarding your interpretation. We are
now a current building owner in the Industrial Park which we occupy
and I feel we are in compliance to the current ordinances.
I also believe if you were to check the minutes of past meetings
you will find that I have received permission to store trailers
outside the facility.
However, since you have raised an issue we would very much like to
comply with all of your wishes. Therefore, please send us an
application of ordinance amendment form as you have suggested in
18.
I would also ask that the City loin me in this reQuest since it
would obviously promote and encourage expansion within the Oakwood
Industrial Park.
S *rely,
VK
aye oil l
JCM 1 j e
cc$
Flick
Wolfsteller, City Administrator
Jeff
O'Neill, Assistance City Administrator
John
Simola. Public Works Director
Paul
Weingorden, City Attorney
Brat
Weiss. City Engineer
Brad
Fyle, Mayor
C7- 0)
e A P TFARO r. otG
AUMAM M COSCOm CO. Wa00M RU PaoesMmM
I OF
010 d Ix
UNCIR �IId.
P.O. 1102 477
P.O. max the P.O. am as
1711th Nay. 0 N.6.
12M Pedeo Avenue
4140Adtaft MN tm
AIexandit MN 66]00 Vvodana MN 26169
IM Aa2002. lel W"
Moon. MN 26267
Z50 Ent Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
MondmUo, MN
55362-9145
Phone (612) 295-2711
Meso: (612) 333-5739
Fax: (612) 295-4404
Jay 0. Morrell
M & P Transport, Inc.
PO Boz 477
Monticello MN 68362
Dear Jay Morrell:
Enclosed is the rezoning application you requested- Please complete the
application and return the application and the $260.00 to City Hall by January
20th, 1996. The Planning Cammissioa wffl meet on February, 7th, 1998.
1f you have any questions, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MONTICELLO
07r&x4 .D
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
JO/Wk
Endosure
cc: File
7-9-P
■ A P TNAIRPOAT, O1G
January 6, 1995
N & P TRANSPORT, INC.
Phone - (612) 2MI22
Nwm • (e1 Z1 rn.740
Fa - (612) 772.2]68
ALWHORLA CONCRETE CO.
Phone - 7634=(812) 7e7r
Fax • (612) 76349M
Jeff Q*Neill, Assistant Administrator
City of. Monticello
250 East Broadway
PO Box 1147
Monticello, PIN 53362
CONCRETE PRODUCTS OF NEIN LONDON, INC.
Peon.. (612) 756-2311
CONCRETE OF KOIW , INC.
Phone . (rotor see-=
WADENA READY- IIX 1
Phone - (218) 0/•1558
Fez - (619 763,WM
In regards to our recent correspondents regarding my ordinances,
would you please send to me, complete any and all ordinances that
would apply to the rezoning application the City is requesting.
If you have any questions please give ms a call.
Sincereelly�,,,•Un r J
$-�
y C. Morrell
M al P Transport
JCM1Je
r A P TRANSPUT. M, MOArOW CO 01=11 CL WAOONI P W4MX I6mm IML
NEWP.O. hoz 477 P.O. am 6M P.O. an M 11660 Nq. D NA
&ADMX W MW 63702 Alezrdit UN SAM a/aam YN sun Nw uz10o4 MN am
M
�otlatm ec
1XV ►8030
YOnr. MN 8237
Council Agenda - 6/8/95
to. Considerallonyf or000sal f mm Buchen Enyimpmental Services for
inflow pnd infiltration reduction for the sanitary sewer
collection svetem. W.S.)
X REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The recently -completed Facilities Plan for our wastewater treatment plant
expansion discusses infiltration and inflow into our sanitary sewer collection
system. Infiltration is generally described as pound water entering our
collection system through cracks, crevices, or openings in our pipe and/or
manholes. Inflow is described generally as a direct passage of rainwater or
storm water into our system. This can come from sump pumps, cross
connections, foundation drains, etc. '!hese two together are called I & 1.
The Environmental Protection Agency defines the term excessive
infiltration, and the definition has changed in the past ten years. Excessive
infiltration is identified by a quantity of flow more than 120 gallons per
person per day domestic base flow and infiltration. Excessive infiltration is
also defined as that amount of infiltration which can be economically and
effectively eliminated from the sewer system as determined through a cost-
effective analysis. Excess inflow means the maximum total flow rate during
storm events which results in chronic operational problems related to the
hydraulic overloading of our treatment plant that totals more than 260
gallons per person per day. This includes domestic base flow plus
infiltration plus inflow. Information in the Facilities Plan shows that our
systemwide infiltration and inflow are less than those determined
excessive.
Based upon both state and federal guidelines, further investigation for
regulatory purposes is unnecessary; we simply need to build the wastewater
treatment plant big enough to handle the peak hourly wet weather flow and
the peak instantaneous wet weather flow. This was essentially the
recommendation when the treatment plant was upgraded in 1880—just build
the treatment plant large enough to handle the extra flow and install
enough pumps to move it around. This did not create a significant problem
during construction, as the treatment plant was totally funded through
federal, state, and revenue sharing funds; but the 60 pumps at the
treatment plant were costly to operate. We paid for moving the additional
water around the plant through higher operational costs.
If one refers to Table 2.12 on Page 2.28 of the Facilities Plan, you can see
the table for design flows for the year 2020. The plant will be designed to
handle an average dry weather flow of 1.82 million gallons per day, an
average wet weather flow of 1.118 million gallons per day, but a peak hourly
Council Agenda - 518/95
wet weather flow of 4.82 million gallons per day, and a peak instantaneous
wet weather flow of 5.19 million gallons per day. To state it simply, if we
can remove I & I from our sanitary sewer collection system, our plant can
be smaller and less costly to operate. With a proposed $11 million
expenditure for the project and $.5 million per year operation and
maintenance coats, one can see that the I & I problem warrants additional
investigation even if it isn't deemed excessive.
There is a company that specializes in inflow and infiltration reduction
programa. Private property plays a significant role in the generation of
I & I with sump pumps, foundation drains, and leaky service linea. Buchen
Environmental recognizes this and addresses it in their plan of action.
Craig Anderson is the Marketing Manager for Buchen Environmental
Services. Craig has worked with the City in the past and played an
instrumental role with PSG in drafting the original operation and
maintenance manuals for the City's wastewater treatment plant in 1980.
After that, Craig worked with the City inspecting portions of our sewer
collection system while he was with Visu Sewer. I have asked
Mr. Anderson to prepare a preliminary proposal for you to review and to
have him present his proposal at the May 8, 1995, Council meeting. His
firm takes a rather comprehensive approach to the reduction of I & I, and
such a program can range from $60,000 to $80,000 for a city the size of
Monticello, depending upon what role the City plays throughout the
program.
Current City Ordinances, specifically Chapter 7, Section 2, Paragraph 15,
states that storm water is not permitted in the sanitary sower system and it
is unlawful for any owner, occupant, or user of any premises to allow that
water to enter the sanitary sewer system. It is another matter, however, to
inspect the 1,600+ connections in the community to find out which ones are
discharging clear water into our system and to have the ordinances in place
and incentives in place to have this clear water directed away ftum our
system, even though it could mean plumbing and/or sewer service repair
costs for homeowners. The Council is asked to give Mr. Anderson time to
explain his proposal and what his firm can do to assist us with their I & I
reduction program.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
The first alternative, after review of the proposal and presentation by
Buchen Environmental Services, is to direct staff to negotiate a
contract with this firm fbr specific tasks and the coats associated with
those tasks.
Council Agenda - 5/&95
The second alterative would be to table action on the I & I reduction
proposal until a future meeting.
3. The third alternative would be to do nothing at this time.
C• STAFF R.ECONQ�NDATION:
It is the recozrmendation of the Public Works Director and City
Administrator that we develop an I & I reduction program with the
assistance of Buchen Environmental Services as outlined in alternative pl.
The short period of time we have makes utilizing City staff not possible; I
believe we will need major input and assistance from a firm such as Suchen
Environmental Services.
I have spoken with Jim Kangus, our contract building official from Paul
Waldron & Associates, and Gary Anderson about us performing the
individual home and business inspections ourselves. Jim has had
experience in the past doing these and has done over 300 of them He
indicated it takes an additional person to schedule appointments and handle
phone calls regarding missed appointments, and many people cancel their
appointments without noti&ing the inspector. In many cases, you end up
going back to the same house two or three times. Jim and Gary would not
have time to do this over the next few months, and it appears that Jim's
firm may not be able to provide any individual to do this either.
Consequently, the proposal frrom Buchen Environmental Services may be
our best approach to our I & I reduction program inspections.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Copy of current ordinance regarding storm water; Copy of proposal from
Suchen Environmental Services (included under separate cover).
7-2-12: LIABILITY FOR REPAIRS: After the initial connection has been
made to the curb stop or the sewer lead, the applicant,
owner, or the occupant or user of such premises shall be liable for all
repairs required to any water, sanitary or storm sewer lines necessary
for connection of the premises to the street main, including any
necessary street repairs.
(6/8/81, 6101)
7-2-13: INSTALLATION OF CONNECTIONS: All connections to the water
system and sanitary sewer system shall be performed by a
plumber licensed to do plumbing in the city, except that nothing in this
chapter shall be construed as to prohibit an individual owner from
obtaining a permit and installing such connection by his own labor,
provided, however, that said construction is conducted under the
regulations of this chapter and requirements of the engineer and
plumbing inspector.
7-2-14: CITY NOT LIABLE: The City shall not be held liable at any
time for any deficiency or failure in the supply of water to
the customer whether the same be occasioned by shutting off the water
for repair or connections or for any cause whatever.
L7-2-15: STORM WATER NOT PERMITTED IN SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: It shall
be unlawful for any owner, occupant, or user of anymises to direct into or allow any storm water or surface water orer from air conditioning systems to drain into the sanitary sewer
tem of the city.
7-2-16: EXCAVATION WORK AND TESTING OF METERS:
(A) All installation work or repair of connections to the water and
sewer systems, including grades, bends, and backfilling, shall be
performed under the direction and supervision of the plumbing
inspector. No work shall be covered or backfilled until directed
by said inspector. All work and excavations shall be protected by
barricades and warning markers and lights reasonable and suitable
to the purpose. The City shall be held harmless of any claim or
loss as might otherwise arise for damage, loss, or injury caused by
or arising by reason of such work being performed; and the
applicant causing such work to be done shall give undertaking to
the City with respect thereto.
7-2-17: EMERGENCY REGULATIONS: The Council may impoeo emergency
regulations pertaining to the conservation of water by
resolution of the Council and by giving notice by publication or by
posting in the City Hall and at such public places as the Council may
direct.
7-2-18: RIGHT TO ENTER LAND: The City by any authorized employee or
agent shall have the right to enter and be admitted to any
lands and property in the city for the purpose of inspection of
materials, plumbing work, and fixtures of all kinds used by or in
connection with the water and sower systems.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE VII/Chet 2/Pe 88
CCA A
Council Agenda - 6/8/95
i i . consideration of p request for re5onsideng#on of a carnival license -
Monticello Mall Merchants Asssrdation. (R.W.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Ms. Julie Ellis, Promotion Director for the Monticello Mall Merchants
Association, will be in attendance at the meeting to request the Council
reconsider its previous action limiting the carnival license to 8 days at the
Monticello Mall. The primary reason for requesting reconsideration is the
carnival operator and the Monticello Mall merchants would like to see it
operational for the last two weekends in May-, and if the license is limited to
eight days, they would not be able to operate two full weekends.
The Merchants Association and carnival operator would like to request the
home be amended under one of the two following options.
Increase the license to a minimum of nine days so that the carnival
could operate between Friday, May 18, and Saturday, May 27, or
until May 28 (Sunday), which would require a ten-day permit.
If the Council is not agreeable to increasing the number of days,
allow the eight days to be split between the two weekends, with the
carnival being idle Monday through Thursday, May 22 -May 26.
As an additional note, the Council's approval at the last meeting of this
license request was contingent upon all utility charges being brought up to
date at the mall site. The mall owner has eliminated their account from the
delinquent list recently.
li. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Allow the carnival license to be increased from eight daysninjor
ten enabling the operation to cover two weekends in May. o pyt,
2. Do not increase the number of days but allow the eight days to be
split between two weekends.
3. Allow the previous action of a contiguous eight-day license to remain
as is.
Council Agenda - 5/W95
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIOP[:
Since I was not sure whether the Council had realized that reducing the
original request from 13 days to B would not allow the carnival to operate 2
weekends, I thought it might be appropriate for the Council to at least
address the issue again. Since both the Merchants Association
representative and carnival operator noted that the bulk of their business
occurs on weekends, both parties indicated they would like to have the
Council reconsider their request by at least adding one day to allow for the
carnival to be operated on Friday and Saturday nights for two weekends. If
the Council feels eight days is still sufficient, this can be your option.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
Council Agenda - &W6
12. Com dderajion of an Amendment to thq Monticello Zoning Orditmnoe
that would change the efign setback minimum. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Essentially, the ordinance amendment is a housekeeping matter that
removes inconsistencies within the ordinance and enables placement of
pylon signs in the B-4 (downtown) district at the property line, which is
consistent with the minimum setback for buildings in the B-4 zone. The
Planning Commission voted unanimously to adopt the ordinance
amendment as presented.
See the attached documentation firom the City Planner for the information
on this topic.
D. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the ordinance amendment as proposed based on the
findings below:
a. corrects an inconsistency within the body of the current sign
ordinance
b. correlates the sign setback to the building setback, a more
natural regulation
C. results in a more easily -interpreted and applied sign ordinance
2. Motion to deny adoption of the ordinance amendment It would not
be necessary to make a separate finding of fact to support this
motion; however, the Council may consider the present ordinance,
together with current interpretation and policy, to adequately address
the issue of f-eestanding sign setbacks.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance amendment as proposed.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Planner's report prepared in conjunction with Cedar Street Garden Center
conditional use permit; Propoaed ordinance amendment.
PPR -28-1995 10:48 NRC oil »> �10—
Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
RC URBAN PLANNING• 0 a S 1 O -MARKETT RESEARCH
MMORAMUM
TO: Monticello Planning Commission
FROM: Stephen Grumman
DATEL 27 Apel 1995
R& Monticello - Fieedaadia8 Sign ilegulOM in the 11.4 District
FUZ NO: 191.06
RAMOROMM
At it IM meedelgI the PWmiog Commbaion dismaed the inure of the ..,...,,.r....tng
freestanding ales at the Cedar Street Garden Centerb our report oa the Garden Ceatces
Caoditiooal Use Permit amendment, it was wed situ the dgn setback requirements In the 8-4
Mulct were taoosi— with the bnildtn; setbact ..:. .. .......This is related to the portion of
the sign regulations which reqube pylon signs to be setback from the property line a distance of
15 fat, while buildings in the B•4 DiWtt may be eoartraaed with a zero seaback
This brae was disamed in our report on the Cedar Sum Garden Center. The Planning
Commiuioa's conseesus was to address the Sign seduck mquirements in the 8.4 District as a
community Ordinance isms, other than an issue db dy rchtod to the 0 - Ir Curter Conditional
Use Permit. The altemative approaches are recapped in the following section.
ANALYSIS A
• The fire altamtive wadd be to leave the Ordinance buguage as it mods. This proaoou
two geoeral ftwtdaevcks. Plat b the roe mentioned In tbo Cadar Street Garden Caner
issuer Tho btdWM in the 154 Dtwkt an be located at the paoWly Uue, whom a pylon
dpi must be waback 15 fea :son Zoning Ordinance Sea. 3.9 (C) Subd. 7.) The second
5775 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 555 1 Sl. Louis Park. MN 55416 - (612) 595.9636•Fax. 57 7
, 10. 48 NRC blC SJS P. U,, Ub
ptoblma is related m Section 3-9 [El WA- 4.(a). Ibis lection mpi es pylae sips to be
located amde of the requited yuda in say mmmg dirt. lbu moans that in thoso
districts which hm building setbacks of moan thea 15 fact, which Is all ditmic4 but the
&4. In those districts, the 13 foot sign setback reQ bumot is irrelevant sbm the building
setbacY aosld predominate.
• Mw wood altmettm would be to Minim the pylon alp regmremcat which tequuet
that smch signs meat the tegulsr building left* thea atter rho 15 foot s fid
requimmaat to a standard of 30 peroeast of the baildiag setback. 71h approach would
aoodnoe rho City's policy of ngulaAg pyo signs cW4 by mating disuda, and would
eliminate the "N .... i, .,i between both the two Ordiname sections, and between the
diffmnlW B-4 building and sign sabackL A draft Ordinance which a;=mpIahes this
effect is allached to this report.
la order to acoos;J111 this lamer approach, the Planning Commission mast maloe Hodl
which comply with tho Zoning Ordim m rsgoistioaa for emmdmmta. 'the planning
Commission's coslsidm don of an OadM= amendment Is to be based upon the following
factors, %I others:
1. Rrlatiaash�
2.ihe geognphkal area hmmhvd.
3. Wbetbar the use willdepredate the area fn which h is proposed
4.7be d atactor of the vm=mding area.
3.7he .. —.. . � � . l nand for the arc.
In anabzi g d= fhb It Is clear that the (sty ail not be hftmdadng a now ase into any ams,
but railer, it will meter be n:gaf4bg tbo location of an existing use (pylon dM). Tbo primary
tactor of the above ttearu is alnnber 4, the character of the aanounding arca, and mranber S, rho
demonmftd creed for the ase. With ngud to the murmading area, pylon ales nscIalromants
which aamdw a location behind tie btdldhg setback would appear to be an bradonal atandatd.
With regard to demonosted aced, tbao Is little ugumeat that char ad ttsoonbatinas
wmmuaiatioa Is a need, and a rtght, of foal property owners. Where the Ordlaames which
regulate that communication aro plain, the policies of the Comprehensive Pim ate most easily
effect urod. Such a Andhlg to arppw of a motion to mod the Zoning Ordinanoo would
acwnW'sh the Ordinance Ameadmmt requirmands.
SUMMARY
Tho Sip section of the Zoning Ordbmoe bon=* In conflict with itself In vWW to b setback
rogaiemnems. We world rocoaameod an aramfbneat to the Ordbanoe which corrects the
ia�t,.s, and clarion the ImMent of Vit 40 in 84 MMkts. A aegg Md draft
Ordinuroearneadmerut Is attached.
PC: Jeff O'Neill
PPR -13-1995 1601 IAA 99-007 612 595 9837 P.02/12
IFFN-A Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
C unaAN PIANNINo- DES'IOM- MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Moaticcllo Planning Commission
FROM: Stepbm Griumaa
DATE 13 April 1995
REL Montioell - Cedar Street Garden Ceaut CFaMwzty 'Fair's)
FME NO: 191.07 - 95.05
Batkgr= d and B4faetlnte
Cedar Street Garden C.eata has spplied for an amendmaa to a Conditional Use Permit odaioally
Issued to dl predecessor 'Felt's Gard CesdC in 1989. The purpose of the amendment is
to relocate rock bias from the Broadway frontage to the nordmaa comer of the Etre, currently
demoted to equipment noraM The ruck bins would be replaced with addm-1 parking. No
other changes am proposed at this time. AmandmeM to Condhimal Use Permits are Processed
as if they wets new applilatinas.
Analysis of Altaaadves
Me Ran Chmm
The Coed Use Femit Beamed to 1989 h -h~ a series of fooatem conditions which
controlled use of the aim. For tho patrp = of this teview, it is asmmed that the ymvloosty
esmblished eondidons Mete properly complied wBh, bowever an lospection should be made to
verify this aaalMWalon Iachlded in than moons wag as agroemeat that a pordCn of the
parlring an along Broadway oeed not be embed a regniud in the Zoning Oldioanee, perdiog
future expand- of the paddne lot Also approved in the orloW permit was rd& from paving
the drive arra mw4ng the rock bins. This reW was granted v4 a varimre fkom ib paving
standards, with the coaditiom that no cusmmer d=ugh traffic were to be allowed.
5775 Wayzata Blvd - Suite 555 - St. Louis Park, " 55416 - (612) 595 -9636 -Fax. 595-9
\i
RPR -13-1995 1601 NRC
This application would fulfill the expectation of the 1989 approval. At this time, Paving of the
new parting amu and completion of the auhiog tlwuld be a re gninmenr of the CUP
amendment The trrffcc pamern for customers, as daigoed on the sine on, will be to mars
from Cedar Seat, and travel either north or east through the parking las. Traffic which travels
east would thea exit at a wrb art adjacent to the former location of the rock bins. As with the
Previous permit, a cmdition 9wald be atracbed resmifag mm mer tnfflc fmm the unpaved
areas, presammg that the City is willing to allow the cr a—,, of the gravel surfacing in such
areas.
With regard to the relocation of the rock bms, tlm previous site plan indicates a sibt foot high
cedar fcacc or Lodsope screen from the nelgbbonag properties. 2be City should mview the
existing screening autd detemaine its adequacy to buffer the proposed rock bin use from the
Awning l -
MILLUM
The current Gamin Center heestaadiag sign is timated in a ....... ,..�,.....:,�, location adjacent
to the Broadway Strut right of way. The Mamicell Zoning Ordinance ngaires a sethaci for
such signs of flfteem feet from the property lim Maditiof the sign wUI M=4 be
proposed by the nmav opera= to rile , the name d aage. According to off taformstion, the
sign was not gnoted any special permisdoa to be located within the regnhed sign setback. As
such, the'—Non of this sign would need to be ad&cuW in order to be We to malas a finding
that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will mat the standards of the Zoning Ondiinaace, a
typical fz=r in the City's considemdtm of such Pernis.
ibeae aro three posalwities which the Planning Comzoiuim may wish to consider. First would
be a rcgWr=eat that the sign be relocated to mea the required Sftem foot setback u is not
clear from the atte plsa, but such a telomtlm may requite the elimination d nae of the parking
spaces. A samcd ab=mstive would be considmaim of a vadam from the sign aethack
.,,1. Variances require a lindiog of specs{ condition seJuing to a a... ... .....&'c
physical hardship which would otherwise preehtde cc*iance with the pedo>mu= nanduds
In our quick review of this situation, sucb a special eoadid— may be difficult to shm.
A third alternative would be consideration of ammdmeaa to the sign regulations{ relating to
freestanding sign setimcm. There may be some j asdflcation In this aln7nasiva in that while
freestanding signs are tequhed to be ser back filteea iba fmca the right of way, buildhW can
be conssucted with a aero setback In this zoning district. 'Iyiag the sign setbacks to building
setbaclu may be a rcuotrable approach which the Piaoniag Cemmtsdon should discus.
Regardless of the m3lid m chosenthe sppliaat should be given some direction u the Planning
Comrrdarf a's w4hea in this tegud Any apptiadoas ncessary could be made by the appliant
and considered by the Planning Commission at Is =a tneedn .
PPR -13-1995 1601 NRC 612 595 9857 P.W12
The Planning Commission is chayged with =nndamg the following items m its eontesnplmon
of a Cznd.;ont Use Permit appl md=
• Relationship m the Comprehensive Plan.
• The arra involved.
• Wbether such use will toad to or acumlly depreciate the area in which S is proposed.
• The character of the waoondiag area.
• The d—,.........1 read far such nae.
Tbk area is a pas of the extended Cental Bttsieeat Dist>ict. and L meed B4, Begiomal
Business District Since the ase exists an the pQeseat loatioalhde impact is aspected on the
sttaoandiag netlobwbood. As noted above, the changes to the operadrm sboald be reviewed
as they WJM to the immeSeiy sdjaming property owners, pudcub* in the adCWUT of the
suoeaiag am the sita. It world be aspected that a mduction,in the amouat of gravel odwe, and
more a8 -surer ensooma patting, a clearer caft for pub pat9dng ahwld lmptove the site's
operation in reli an to the =*Madwod.
Co>tch" iora
The amendment to the garden comer Canditlamal Use Parmit is m cpponamity to remove an
die use fmm the Broadway Strad fiontage. In addhlom, the ezpansl— of the off -strand
parldn ahaold serve to mdttoe congestion is the na dndag peat seasons of use, ad reds=
the po=tW for adverse impacts ham► anpaved areas in and tape the Central Bud= Disain
For than reasons, approval of the Conditional Use P=it amendmewt is fe=na%eoded. This
nmommardatiom is based repos the following :
1. The garden center dea>oaase ca®pltanoe with all pneviM* imposed coaditims of
the original CUP issued in 1989.
2. The area hem which do rock bias an being removed is to be pried and robed. peer
Ordiaanoe requirements for oommamdal paddag lob, and par the atpecation of die 1989
Permit spprovaL
3. The arta maoaading the now root bis ioaaion is dct=hzd to be adeqntay
screened at presets, or additional =eeafag efforts an degoi:ed
4. The heestandiag dgn Is mato to be c onfamin j, aftlmer throogb an ameirdMPMt to the
Ordtmm. or reloeadcas of the dga to mea cotwolWtg mach.
pc: Jeff O'Neill
ra 1
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN THAT CHAPTER 3-9, GENERAL PROVISIONS, OF.THE
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO SIGNS BY
REGULATING THE ALLOWABLE 89MACM FOR PYLON SIGNS AND
SIGNS OVER TWO SQUARE FEET IN AREA BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 3-9 [C] 7 is hereby amended to read as follows:
In any district, any portion of any sign exceeding two (2) square feet shall
be set back a distance equal to fitly percent (60%) of the required building
setback for that district as defined in Section 3-3 [C] of the Monticello
Zoning Ordinance, as may be amended.
Section 3-9 [E] 4(a) is hereby amended to read as follows:
(a) Location: No pylon sign shall be located closer to the property line
than as allowed in Section 3.9 [C] 7. In the case of a corner lot, both
sides fronting on a public right-of-way shall be deemed the front.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in tall force from and after its passage and
publication.
Adopted by the Monticello City Council this 8th day of May, 1995.
Mayor
City Administrator
Council Agenda - !i/JW5
13. Conside;sltloa of an ordinance amendment adopting 1994 BpildinY
Code. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City Council is asked to consider adopting the 1994 Minnesota State
Building Code with the numerous amount of changes within the building
code, which are submitted for your review. The most noticeable ones you
will see changing from the 1988 code to the 1994 Building Code. I have a
booklet that we made highlighting the changes from the 1988 code to the
1994 code. If you would like to see the changes in the entire booklet which
is comprised of over 50 pages of code changes, please feel Gree to stop by my
office and I will explain those changes prior to the City Council meeting.
B. ALTERNATIVE SONS
1. Approve the ordinance Amendment adopting the 1994 Building Code.
2. Do not adopt the 1994 Building Code.
C_ STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
With the proposed many changes to the 1994 Building Code, with the
summarization of the most noticeable changes submitted with the
supporting data, staff recommends approval of the 1994 Uniform Building
Code.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the existing building code section of the ordinance; Copy of the
proposed 1994 Building Code update to the ordinance; Copies of the most
noticeable changes to the code.
13
CARWN-r 6RD1JurgAvCE
CHAPTER 1
BUILDING CODE
SECTION:
4-1-1:
Intent and Purpose
4-1-2:
Building Code
4-1-3:
Organization and Enforcement
4-1-4:
Permits, Inspections and Fees
4-1-5:
Fire Zone Districts
4-1-6:
Violations and Penalties
4-1-7:
Effective Date of Ordinance
4-1-1: INTENT AND PURPOSE: An ordinance adopting the Minnesota
Building Code; providing for its administration and
enforcement: regulating the erection, construction, enlargement,
alteration, repair, moving, removal, demolition, conversion, occupancy,
equipment, use, height, area, and maintenance of all buildings and/or
structures in the city of Monticello; providing for the issuance of
permits and collection of fees.
4-1-2: BUILDING CODE: The Minnesota State Building Code, one spy of
which is on file in the office of the City Administrator, has
been adopted by Minnesota Statutes 16.651 (1971) as a uniform building
code applicable throughout the state. Such code, its supplements,
amendments, additions, addenda, alterations, subtractions, and revisions
as currently adopted and which may in the future be adopted and
incorporated as part of the code, is hereby confirmed as the building
code of the City of Monticello and incorporated in this ordinance as
completely as if set out in full. The administrative authority for the
City of Monticello as specified in 4-1-3 of th ie code shall maintain on
file in his/her office a record of all adopted supplements, amendments,
etc., and shall utilize in the enforcement of: the building code as if
set out in full in this section.
(A) The 1988 Edition of the State Building Code, with appendixes,
adopts by reference the following codes:
1. Minnesota Rules, Part 1300 - Code Administration.
2. Minnesota Rules, Part 1301 - Cert 1fication and Continuing
Education of Building Officials.
3. Minnesota Rules, Part 1302 - Building Construction and State
Agoncy Construction Rules.
4. Minnesota Rules, Part 1305 - Adoption of the 1988 Uniform
Building Code by roferonce.
Tho 1987 ANSI -A-17.1 Code for elevat ore and rslatod devices is
an amendment to Chapter 51 of the U13C and no longor found in
SBC Rules 1320.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE IV/Chet 1/ 750"A")
a) Required Provisions --UBC Appendix, Chapter 35, Sound
Transmission Control.
5. Minnesoa Rules, Part 1315 - Electrical Code.
6. Minnesota Rules, Part 1325 - Solar Energy Systems.
7. Minnesota Rules, Part 1330 - Technical Requirements for
Fallout Shelters.
8. Minnesota Rules, Part 1335 - Flood -Proofing Regulations (when
required).
9. Minnesota Rules, Part 1340 - Facilities for the Handicapped.
10. Minnesota Rules, Part 1346 - Minnesota Uniform Mechanical
Code, 1990 Edition.
11. Minnesota Rules, Part 1350 - Manufactured Home Rules.
12. Minnesota Rules, Part 1355 - Plumbing Code - Administrative
Rule 4715.
13. Minnesota Rules, Part 1360 - Prefabricated Structures.
14. Minnesota Rules, Part 1365 - Variation of Snow Loads.
15. Minnesota Rules, Part 1370 - Model Energy Code -
Administrative Rule 7670.
16. Minnesota Rules, Part 7510.3100-7510.3280 - Adoption of the
1988 Uniform Fire Code by reference.
(6/22/81, 0103)
(1/10/94, #245)
4-1-3: ORGANIZATION AND ENFORCEMENT: The organization of the
Building Department and enforcement of the code shall be
conducted within the guidelines established by Chapter 2 of the Uniform
Building Code, 1982 Edition. The code shall be enforced within the
incorporated limits of the city of Monticello, and any extra -territorial
limits shall be any area, Incorporated or unincorporated, designated
under a Joint Powers Agreement entered into by the City of Monticello
and any other township/village/city/county.
The Building Department shall be the Building Code Department of the
City of Monticello. The administrative authority shall be a State
Certified Class II "Building Official" so designated by the appointing
authority. Tho appointing authority shall be the City Council of the
City of Monticello.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE IV/Chet 1/
4-1-4: PERMITS, INSPECTIONS AND FEES:
(A) The issuance of permits, conduction of inspections, and collections
of fees shall ba established by the City Council.
(7/13/81, 0104)
(B) Surcharge: In addition to the permit fee required by item A above,
the applicant shall pay a surcharge. The surcharge computation is
based on the value of construction. Surcharge equals .0005 of the
total value of construction or 50 cental whichever is greater.
(7/13/81, 0104)
4-1-5: FIRE ZONE DISTRICTS: All areas within the city of Monticello
shall be i n Fire Zone 03.
4-1-6: VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES: The penalty described in the
Uniform Building Code, 1979 Edition, Section 205 as amended,
shall be in keeping with Minnesota Statutes 609.031, which provides for
a maximum fine of $500 or imprisonment for 90 days, or both.
4-1-7: EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE: The effective date of this
ordinance shall be upon publication.
(5/29/84, 0135)
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE IV/Chet 1/n3
qovposed Ordihancei
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, HEREBY
ORDAINS THAT TITLE 4, CHAPTER 1, OF THE MONTICELLO CITY
ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO BUILDING CODE BE AMENDED TO
READ AS FOLLOWING:
CHAPTER 1
BUILDING CODE
SECTION:
4-1-1:
Intent and Purpose
4-1-2:
Building Code
4-1-3:
Application, Administration, and Enforcement
4-14:
Permits and Fees
4-1-6:
Fire Zone Districts
4-1-6:
Violations and Penalties
4-1-7:
Effective Date of Ordinance
4.1-1: INTENT AND PURPOSE: An ordinance adopting the Minnesota
State Building Code. This ordinance provides for the application,
administration, and enforcement of the Minnesota State Building Code by
regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, moving,
removal, demolition, conversion, occupancy, equipment, use, height, area, and
maintenance of all buildings and/or structures in the city of Monticello; provides
for the issuance of permits and collection of fees thereof, provides penalties for
violation thereof; repeals all ordinances and parts of ordinances that conflict
therewith.
4-1.2: BUILDING CODE: The Minnesota State Building Code, established
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 168.69 to 16B.76, is hereby adopted
as the building cede for this jurisdiction. Such code, its supplements,
amendments, additions, addenda, alterations, subtractions, and revisions as
currently adopted and which may in the future be adopted and incorporated as
part of the Godo, is hereby confirmed as the building code of the City of Monticello
and hereby incorporated in this ordinance as if fully set out herein.
(A) The Minnesota Slate Building Code includes the following chapters of
Minnesota Rules:
Ordinance Amendment No.
Page 2
1.
1300
Minnesota Building Code
2.
1301
Building Official Certification
3.
1302
Stals Building Construction Approvals
4.
1306
Adoption of the 1994 Uniform Building Code, including
Appendix Chapters:
a. 3, Division I, Detention and Correctional Facilities
b. 12, Division II, Sound Transmission Control
C. 29, Minimum Plumbing Fixtures
6.
1307
Elevators and Related Devices
8.
1316
Adoption of the 1993 National Electrical Code
7.
1326
Solar Energy Systeme
8.
1330
Fallout Shelters
9.
1336
Floodproofing Regulations
10.
1340
Facilities for the Handicapped
11.
1346
Adoption of the 1991 Uniform Mechanical Code
12.
1360
Manufactured Homes
13.
1360
Prefabricated Buildings
14.
1366
Snow Loads
16.
1370
Storm Shelters
16.
4716
Minnesota Plumbing Code
17.
7670
Minnesota Energy Code
18.
Adoption of the 1991 Uniform Fire Code by reference.
(B) The City of Monticello may adopt by reference any or all of the following
optional appendix chapters of the 1994 Uniform Building Code as
authorized by Minneacta rule part 1306.0020 subpart 2; 3, Division III,
1992 One and Two Family Dwelling Code; 16, Reroofing; 19, Exposed
Residential Concrete; 31, Division II, Membrane Structures; 33, Excavation
and Grading.
The following optional appendix chapters of the 1994 Uniform Building
Code are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for
this maricipaUty.
Chapter 16, Reroofing
(C) The City of Monticello may adopt by reference any or all of the following
options) chapters of Minnesota rule: 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems
with option 8 Wroup M, 8, or F occupancies with 2,000 or more gross
square feet) or 8a (Group M, 8, or F occupancies with 6,000 or more gross
square feet); 1310, Building Security; 1336, Floodproofing regulations parts
1336.0600 to 1936.1200.
Ordinance Amendment No.
Page 3
4-1-3: APPLICATION, ADMINISTRATION, AND ENFORCEMENT: The
code shall be enforced within the incorporated limits of the city of
Monticello, and any extra -territorial limits permitted by Minnesota Statute
16B.62, subdivision 1, shall be any area, incorporated or unincorporated,
designated under a Joint Powers Agreement entered into by the City of Monticello
and any other township/village/city/county.
The code enforcement department of the City of Monticello is called the Building
Code Department.
A Minnesota certified Building Official must be appointed by the City Council of
the City of Monticello to administer the code (Minnesota Statute 16B.65).
4-1-4: PERMITS AND FEES:
(A) The issuance of permits and the collection of fees shall be as authorized in
Minnesota Statute 16B.62, subdivision 1, and as provided for in chapter 1 of
the 1994 Uniform Building code and Minnesota rules parts 1305.0106 and
1305.0107.
(B) Permit fees assessed for work governed by this code shall be established by
the City Council.
(C) Surcharge: A surcharge fee shall be collected on all permits issued for work
governed by this code in accordance with Minnesota Statute 16B.70.
4.1-5: FIRE ZONE DISTRICTS: All areas within the city of Monticello
shall be in Fire Zone M3.
4-1-6: VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES: A violation of the code is a
misdemeanor (Minnesota Statute 16B.69).
4-1-7: EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE: The effective date of this
ordinance shall be upon publication.
Adopted by the Monticello City Council this 8th day of May, 1995.
Mayor
City Administrator
1988 Uniform Building Code
to
1994 Uniform Building Code
v Update
139
SMOKE DETECTORS
SHALL SOUND AN ALARM
SIGNAL AUDIBLE IN ALL
SLEEPING ROOMS
BUILDING
SECOND STORY
BASEMENT
FIRST
STORY
D
UIIC SEC. 310.0.1.4
Section 310.9.1 Smoke
Detectors
Smoke detectors are now required within
each sleeping room of a dwelling unit.
Detectors in sleep rooms are in addition to
those required in other locations.
Placing detectors within the rooms will
provide a warning to the occupants of the
room if a fire starts within the bedroom
Bed Room
o< /
0
Bed Room
Smoke Detecto; rs
Living Area
13x:
Sections 310.9.1.3
Smoke Detectors
Smoke detectors must receive their
primary power from a commercial
source and be provided with a
battery backup
MATCH TZiE ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT WITH 3 SOLID JOIST SPACE
BLOCK$I WHERE JOISTS RUN PARAI LEL TO FOUNDATION WALL
1..
jr 7
h
n- REBAR & CORE FILL REQ,6' ON CTR & MAX 1' FROM ENDS &
CORNERS ON ALL BLACK WALLS BACK FILLED ONE SIDE ONLY
�• 7
:l
In- X 9" ANCHOR BOLTS REQ 6' O.C. & MAX V FROM ENDS &
•_ •f CORNERS. MIN 2 BOLTS ANY PLATE
CORE FILL 318 NOT REQUIRED WHERE
WALL IS BACK FILLED BOTH SIDES.
. ' A
w .::.
SKY LIGHT WELLS MUST HAVE 8"
FRAWNG TO RECEIVE R•19 INSULATION.
J
II I II � Ij �I
In �I II
v I� II
y I
,
v
INTERIOR VAULTED CEILING GABLES - DIFFERENCE IN
CEILING HEIGHT MUST HAVE 6" FRAMING TO RECEIVE R-19
INSULATION
':dr --e d' ;;eZ L.: -,�N
Section 509.1
Guardrails
Maximum permitted spacing for
intermediate rails or ornamental patterns in
guardrails has been reduced to that which a
4 -inch sphere cannot pass through.
Spacing change will reduce the possibility
that children will be able to squeeze through
such openings.
Exception has been added which will retain
the 6 inch sphere requirement at the
triangular area formed by the tread, riser
and gwardrail.
I�
4" Maximum
y� n
__- s �• Triai�
27
i ,3,y
Table 16•A Uniform
and Concentrated
Loading
Residential Deck
400 Per Square F
Uve Load
Residential Balcony
. r 600 Per %uare�F"t
Uve Load
,,�-i`-�`�'•__�._ Jam.;.._ J�`' '--)`._a,_,?� �_ �- �_ � ._�.
Section 2406.4, Item
io Glazing in
Hazardous Locations
Glazing within S feet of the bottom and top
of stairways, and where bottom edge is less
than 60 inches above an adjacent walling
surface, shall be designed in accordance
with the hazardous location provisions of
Section 240b.
Handrails Section 1
The provisions of this section have been
revised so that handrail extensions are
now regulated. These heights are the same
as that required for handrails.
The length of the handrail extension has
also been modified from 6 inches to where
it must now extend at least IZ inches 1
beyond the top and bottom riser.
.ssp.
34" to 3s"
Above Landing T.
Newel Post or
Saieri Terminal
34.9 to 3,1"
Abc ve Landing
i� .'�(.y r'♦ .' `: , +•T � .�i `f�./t t�!� %'4. ✓�`' ly �� ,rte
Section 302.4,
Exception 3 Fire Rating
for Occupancy
Separations
5/8" Type X
gypsum board
on garage
side
13/8" solid wood
_ door or to minute
door. Self closing
V--- and tight fitting
O
Section 1404 and UBC
Standard 14-2 Vinyl
Siding
A new standard and code section has been
added to provide requirements for vinyl siding.
UBC Standard 14.2 provides a materials
standard which regulates extruded single-wall
siding manufactured from rigid PVC
compound.
Section 1404 regulates the location and
application.
In general, vinyl siding may be installed on
exterior walls of Type V construction in
Minnesota.
Where siding is placed horizontally it must be
fastened 16" o/c horizontally and 12"
vertically. If placed vertically, fasteners must
be spaced 12" o/c both ways.
Nails are to have 3/81' heads and .120 shank
diameter and be long enough to penitrate the
studs or nailing strip 3/411.
X47
N,
Minnesota Plumbing
Code Shower Valves.
A shower or combination shower / bath in
a new or remodeled installation must be
equipped with an antiscald-type shower
control valve.
The valve must be of the thermostatic or
pressure balancing type in accordance with
the ANSI / ASSE standard 1016-79.
Repair or replacement alone does not
require a new valve be installed.
13S
11
Minnesota
Plumbing Code:
Nater Closets
All new floor mounted closets in areas of
the state under the Minnesota Plumbing
Code may not have a flush volume of
more than 1.6 gallons.
The water closet must meet the standards
of the Commissioner of Health and the
American National Standard (ANSI)
Council Agenda - 5/8/95
ra. Consideration of a reanest by Ryan ContractLs to allow cmnatrusftg
activity froax 7@,m,to 10 o.m, W.O., J.S.)
A. REFEREjjF,,AND BACKGROUND:
Current ordinance requires that working hours end at 7 p.m. Ryan
Contracting is requesting that the City Council allow Ryan to work during
extended hours from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. The reason for limiting vvorlung hours
is to minimise the impact on adjoining residential and commercial uses during
at least a portion of the day. In addition, extending hours beyond 7 p.m. can
hamper our ability to inspect projects. It is very difficult for both the City and
OSM to expect its inspection staff to be on duty after 7 p.m.
The Klein Fars project is somewhat unique in that it is well separated from
residential uses; therefore, working beyond 7 p.m. may not create a problem for
the nearest residential area. Therefore, there may be some justifieat ion for
allowing an extension of hours at this site only. If Council is so inclined to
extend the hours with the Klein Farms project, it should be clearly noted in the
motion that the extension is allowed due to the distance between the
construction zone and populated areas.
Regardless of the impact on residential areas, there remains the problem of
finding an inspector to be available between 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. This
particular project is being inspected by OSM and is not a project inspected
regularly by Tom Bose. According to Bret Weiss, OSM will have difficulty in
being able to find an inspector that is willing to work beyond 7 p.m. Perhaps
as a condition of allowing Ryan to work beyond 7 p.m., Ryan Contracting
should be required to pay an additional fee per hour of inspections past 7 p.m.;
however, the workload is such that a second inspector will be needed soon, so
OSM will start a second man next week.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to deny allowing extension of work hours as requested by Ryan
Contracting.
Under this alternative, the City Council would take the position that
allowing Ryan Contracting to work beyond the normal working hours
would set a bad precedent for other projects and would put the City in
the difficult position of coordinating inspection services during this time
period.
Motion to approve an extension of work hours beyond 7 p.m. due to the
distance between the development area and existing residential
properties and subject to one or more of the fbllowing conditions:
Council Agenda - 5095
1. Hours of operation must end at p.m. (Council may wish to
fill in the time period Perhaps you would allow an extension of
time beyond 7 p.m. but not as late as 10 p.m.)
2. Ryan Contracting is to pay the City a supplemental inspection fee
for any hours that an inspector must be available after 7 p.m.
(This amount would be in addition to the amount that the
inspector charges against the projcct on an hourly basis).
3. After-hours construction will not be allowed in the event the
inspector is not available.
4. The extension of hours is on a trial basis only and could be
withdrawn based on neighborhood complaints or other situations
warranting reinstatement of normal working hours.
Under this alternative, the City Council would take tl a view that
the lflein Farms situation is relatively unique and thn allowing
an extension of hours in this situation would not crr --te a bad
precedent.
City staff should follow this item with an ordinance amendment
allowing extension of working hours with conditions on a case-by-
case basis.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
There is some benefit to the City in having the project done on a timely basis.
Extending working hours will help the City achieve this objective. On the
other hand, timely completion of the work is only positive if it is inspected
properly and done in a manner that does not disrupt the neighboring areas.
The first choice in this situation is to deny the request; however, it is our view
that allowing an extension of the working hours to 8 p.m. or 9 p.m. would be a
reasonable alternative as long as the conditions outlined are adopted.
Copy of letter fiom Ryan Contracting, Inc,
is
RYAN CONTRACTING. INC. TEL:612-tly4-32U/ May Ui y5 11:4J Nu.vu, r.0
April 25. 1995
To Honorable City Council
CITY OF MONTICELI.O
250 Best Broadway
MOntic@LLo, Minnesota 35362
RBi KLIEN rARMS
Grading, Streets, Utilities and Appurtenant York
City Project No. 95-02C 1RCI 13081
Monticello. Minnesota
Dear Honorable City Councils
Please accept this letter as our forty 1 written request
for extending working hours on the above referenced project.
We are requesting that working hours be extended from 7t00
e.■. to 10100 p.m. Monday thru Friday and 7z00 m.a, to 7x00
p. a. on Saturday. No work will be performed on Sunday.
We appreciate your time and help on this project and we
Look forward to working with your city and staff. If you
have any questions or concerns please contact me.
Thank you.
Respectfully submitted,
RYAN CONTRACTING. INC.
Scott [. Enright
SEE/bp
col Tom Base. City of Monticello
Bret Melss. Orr-Sohelen-Mayeron L Assooiates, 2no.
+ Y
870013th Ave. E a ShAmpee, MN 53379 a 613891.3100 a Fax: 612.891-1207 (�Q
IT'S
Council Agenda - WW5
is. 4kadderation of reviewina Trunk Highway SS drainagg etndv.
W.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Pete Willenbring of OM will be in attendance to review the Trunk
Highway 25 storm drainage study. As you recall, you were given a copy of
the draft document as part of the agenda packet for the pivvious meeting.
Please review this document and come prepared to discuss it f rther with
its author, Pete Willenbring.
Council Agenda - 6/8/96
16. Copslderatlon of pdgo#t oxygective covenants and establishing lot
gric:es • Eased Knoll subdivlaton. UO.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Council is asked to review the Eastwood Knoll subdivision one last time
prior to initiation of sales activity. Issues that need to be addressed include
adoption of covenants and appointing an architectural committee,
establishment of initial pricing, and providing guidance to staff regarding
negotiation of prices and financing options.
PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
The proposed protective covenants have been prepared by Dale Florek. In
preparing the covenants, Florek combined his experience with the draft
documents already prepared by City staff. Major points to note in the
covenants include a provision for a minimum house size requirement,
mandatory three-cer garage, and a tree preservation review process. An
effort has been made to make the covenants restrictive without unduly
limiting developability of the lots that are in less desirable locations.
Please review the covenants and consider volunteering to sit on the
architectural review committee.
PRICING
Dale Florek has done a market analysis of the site and has established the
suggested pricing as noted on the attached pricing summary. The pricing
listed represents the gMh price or discount price. For purposes of
marketing the properties, the prices will be increased by 6%, which will
reflect the minimum cost to purchase lots via contract -for -deed. The most
expensive lots are proposed to have a selling price of $31,900. The least
expensive lots are proposed to have a selling price of $22,900. The average
price of the lots is $27,000. Florek indicated that he reviewed sale prices
for lots in the general area and established the proposed sale prices at a
level consistent with the market.
Factors that influenced pricing of individual lots included proximity to the
fteeway and proximity to adjoining residential properties, grade problems/
tuckunders, and proximity to the power linea.
Council Agenda - 5/8/95
TERMS
Florek noted that many of the buyers will be selling homes or will need to
liquidate other assets in order to obtain the funds necessary to buy the lot
of choice. For these buyers, having the option of purchasing a lot via
contractrfor-deed will be a desirable option. The terms should require 20%
of the value of the lot as a non-refundable deposit. The term of the contract
should be two years or less to discourage buyers purchasing the lots for
investment purposes. The contract would require an interest payment at
market rate amortized ever 30 years, which would cover the City's holding
cost. Florek noted that buyers interested in Eastwood Knoll will be
relatively sophisticated and likely to have the resources and commitment to
follow through on the contract. He did not think that the City will have a
problem with closing contracts when buyers have put down 20% on the
desired lot.
Construction would be allowed only after frill payment on the lot is made.
On the other hand, the City could take the position that the buyers always
have the option of going to the bank to get the money needed to pay cash
for the property. The City could avoid the administrative hassle of tracking
contract payments, etc., by simply requiring cash for the purchase of each
lot.
At this point, it is assumed that minimal negotiations will occur with
individual buyers. The prices listed will be take -it or leave -it prices. This
position could change if Iota do not sell.
Florek has suggested a builder program that would allow a builder to buy a
lot, then hold up to three lots for $500/lot for up to 180 days.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
DECISION ONE - PROTECTIVE COVENANT18
1. Motion to adopt the protective covenants as is or as modified during
discussion and appoint Jeff O'Neill, Gary Anderson and
Councilmember to the architectural review committee.
This has basically been Rick's project up to this point. Due to the
fact that he is interested in purchasing a lot. he has removed himself
from the situation. If Rick remains interested in buying a lot, I will
be on the review committee. If Rick does not buy a lot, perhaps he
Is
Council Agenda - 5/895
should sit on the committee. Gary is proposed to sit on the
committee because of his understanding of building/construction
valuation. A Council member is asked to sit on the committee to help
assure that the development moves in the general direction desired
by Council.
DECISION TWO - LOT PRICIIVG AND TERMS
Motion to adopt initial price fisting and establish potential terms for
buyers interested in purchasing via contract -for deed as outlined
above.
Motion to adopt initial price listing and require bill rash payments.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the protective covenants as presented or with
modifications as identified by Council. Staff also recommends that Council
adopt the initial lot pricing as noted. The action above paves the vvey to sell
lots, which will begin in earnest immediately.
Protective covenants; Lot price listing and map; Other information.
19
PROPOSED COVENANTS
EASTWOOD KNOLL SUBDIVISION
Land Use and Budding Tme. Each lot shall be used exclusively for
residential purposes. No building'shall be erected, altered, placed, or
permitted to remain on any lot other than one detached single family
dwelling, together with appurtenant garage, fence, swimming pool, or
accessory structure.
Architectural Control. No building shall be placed, erected, or altered on
any lot until the construction plans and specifications and the plans
showing the nature, kind, shape, height, materials, and location/setback of
the structure have been approved in writing by the Architectural Control
Committee (ACC) as to the quality of workmanship and materials, harmony
of external design with existing structures, and as to the location with
reaped to topographic and finish grade elevation. All building plans and
designs and exterior colors shall be reviewed by the ACC for the purpose of
ensuring that the principal street frontage exposure of budding(s) are
constructed of materials such as stucco, cedar, redwood, and brick accents,
ora combination thereof. Cc at t%� Aw'{„ ifwo"_ fRe e A0 "J
Each single family dwelling constructed on any lot within the developer's
property shall, together with improvements appurtenant thereto, have
sufficient architectural characteristics and interior square footage to create
the image of a market value, as determined by the ACC, of not less Ulan
One Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($16000.00).
Exception for Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 1, 2, 12, 13, Block 2; and Lots 1, 2, 3,
Block 3: The ACC will determine their value at no less than $130,000 as
adjusted for 1996 home values.
Other items to pertain to all properties are:
• 20% of the front elevation shall be done in brick or stone.
L
• All yards shall be sodded o rear camera of the house from the
curb (allowances may be made for using native ground cover).
• Roofs shall be a minimum of 8/12 pitch unless a flatter pitch is
necessary to accommodate an architecturally -significant design
feature of the home.
• Homo foundation footprint minimums, excluding garages and porches,
shall be:
EASTWOOD.COV: 6/6/96 Page 1 R
For Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 1, 2, 12, 13, Block 2; and Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 3:
Rambler--------------- 1260 with a 3 -car garage
2Story------------.-- 860 with a 3 -car garage
Multi-level-----------. 1600 with a 3 -car garage
Home foundation footprint minimums for all other Iota shall be as
follows:
Rambler-------------- 1400 with a 3 -car garage
2 -Story-----------.---- 1100 with a 3 -car garage
Multi-level-------------- 1660 with a 3 -car garage
"NOTE: Three -car garages may not be mandatory if the ACC decides
the home has the architectural integrity to carry the valuation
without it.
Driveways shall be concrete, asphalt, or equivalent hard surface.
4. Temaorary Structures. No structure of a temporary character or nature,
trailer, tent, or shack may be used on any lot at any time as a residence,
either temporarily or permanently. All structures shall be completed and
finished on the exterior within nine months after commencement of the
excavation or construction thereof and before the structure shall be used as
a residence. No dwelling shall be constructed of concrete blocks or blocks of
a similar type on any lot unless the outer exterior walls above grade are of
a decorative variety which meets ACC approval.
b. Nuisances. No accumulation of junk, garbage. or debris may be maintained
on any lot. No trailer house, travel trailer, buses, trucks, camper trucks, or
junk care are allowed to be stored on premises unless properly garaged. No
livestock shall be kept on the premises except for two doge and tate. No
breeding or boarding kennels will be permitted. Dogs and cats will not be
allowed to run free. Dogs must be properly kenneled and must not be
allowed to bark uncontrollably. Kennels must be of chain link fencing and
set on concrete slabs. A site barrier fence blocking the view Brom the street
may be required Oy the ACC. All kgnnela musLW approved by the ACC.
8. nm' 1A Q archItectural control committee shall
consist of the City of Monticello Building Official and/or a designated
representative of the developer. The Building Official and/or the developers
designated representative shall review all building structure plane and
specifications for adherence to the covenants and restrictions that relate to
minimum building standards along with the harmony of the exterior design
and location in relation to surrounding structures.
EASTWOOD.COV: 6/6196
Page 29
Tree ?rgsgrvation. The building plan shall include all survey information
required by the City. The survey shall also show the location, variety, and
approximate size of mature trees located within 36 feet of all construction
and grading activity. The ACC shall review grading and site development
plans for adherence to the objective of saving as many mature trees as
possible. The ACC has the authority to require that reasonable efforts be
made to preserve trees. Such efforts include construction of retaining walls
and the like. The ACC may require a minimum of two 2 -inch diameter
frees planted in the front yard if the yard is barren. Landscape plan must
be submitted for reviewal.
Term. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions of this declaration shall
run with and bind the land comprising the developer property and shall be
enforceable by the declarants, the owners, and the respective legal
representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns for a term of ten years from
the date this declaration is recorded, atter which time said covenants,
conditions, and restrictions shall be automatically renewed for successive
periods of ten years. The provisions hereof shall be deemed independent
and several, and the invalidity or partial invalidity or unenforceability of
any one provision or portion thereof as may be determined by a Court of
competent jurisdiction shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any of
the other provisions hereof. This declaration may only be amended by a
written instrument signed by the developer and all owners of the developer
property.
EA87WOOD.COV: 6W5
D/�C-
Pago
3
TERMS FOR LOT PURCHASE
EABIWOOD KNOLL SUBDIVISION
'• 5% discount for cash
•• Contract for deed
1-2 year duration of contract
No improvements until the City is paid in full
20% down
Market rate interest
•' Buy 1 lot • cash out City before construction of model home.
V000—
City City will hold up to three lots ® $5ft.V per lot for 180 days.
•' Lot hold binder is nonrefundable but will be applied to purchase price.
EASTWOOD.TEII: &%M
Cash discount price --actual advertised price 51 higher per lot.
EASTWOOD KNOLL LOT PRICE BREAKDOWN
BLOCK 1
Dl= 3
Lot 1 —$26,900.
Lot 1 —$24,900.
2 —$25,900.
2 —$22,900.
3 —$22,900•
3 —$22,900.
4 —$24,000.
4 —$24,900.
5 —$24,000.
5 —$27,900.
$123,700.
6 —$28,900.
7 —$28,900.
Block 2
$181,300.
Int 1 —$25,900.
2 —$27,900.
BLDCK 4
3 —$30,900.
Lot 1 —$26,900.
4 --$31,900.
2 ---$27,900.
5 --$31,900.
3 --$27,900.
6 —$30,900.
4 —$26,900.
7 —$28,900.
$109,600.
8 --$30,900.
9 —$27,900.
BLOCi( 1 --$123,700.
10 ---$28,900.
BLOf]( 2 --$368,700.
11 --$26,900.
BLOCK 3 --$181,300.
12 ---$22,900.
BLOCK 4 --$1091600.
13 —$22,900.
70ML LOT SALE PROCEEDS --$783,300.
$368,700.
MIM1S R.S. OMISSION ----$ 78,330.
NET PROCMG------$704,970.
Title Work,Closing Expesu3ee,Taxen and any negotiated
items must still be subtracted frcm the tut Pr0000da.
Rmq?ptfully Submitted,
DALE FU3REK
EDINA REALTY /(Q
CR pb MOM
EASTWO OD
KNOLL
Council Agenda - 5/895
17. Consideration of purchase of one -ton bucket truck. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND 4ALKGROUND:
We have recently learned that our practice of using a man in a bucket of
the front-end loader to repair traffic lights, install decorations, banners, tree
trimming, etc., must cease immediately. We learned this after an
inspection of our safety program and public works facilities on March 23 of
this year by Berkley Administrators, representing our insurance company.
One of the main tasks performed by a man in the loader bucket was the
changing of the traffic signal bulbs at the various intersections in
Monticello. The City of Monticello is charged with bulb replacement and
painting of all the traffic signals in the city limits with the exception of the
two on the I-94 overpass. This affects not only the state signals on
Highway 26 but the county signal on East County Road 75 at the
intersection of County Road 39 and County Road 118. Northern States
Power Company maintains all of our overhead cobra lights at intersections
and throughout the community. They will not, however, be responsible for
changing traffic signal bulbs due to the small time frame needed to respond
and the fact that they have a heavy workload and emergencies of their own.
We have been lucky so far since the March 23 inspection in that we have
only had one signal light burn out. At that time, we were notified that the
signal light was out early in the morning, and we contacted Olson Electric
when they opened and asked them to change the bulb as soon as possible,
as they have an old bucket truck which can reach the heights necessary.
They did not, however, get the bulb changed until almost 6 o'clock that
evening. Since it was a red light bulb, this time frame is unacceptable, and
we were contacted by the Sheriffs Department twice during the interim to
get the bulb replaced. In addition, the cost to change that single light bulb,
not including the bulb, which we provided, was $103.
The City has rented a bucket truck at least twice a year from one of the
bucket truck suppliers, and We costa us approximately $260 per day plus
six man-hours to go down and pick the unit up and then return it. In
addition, we must provide all general liability and comprehensive insurance
by obtaining a special certificate through our insurance company each time
we rent a truck (est. cost $50). We could get by with a smaller truck than
what we normally rent and use the truck for general transportation and
street and part work if we got something no bigger than a one -ton. We had
figured on purchasing a used pickup for the park and street department and
placed $8,000 in the budget for that. In addition, we have about $1,800 in
rental budget. We have looked around for a used vehicle throughout the
20
Council Agenda - 6/8196
upper midwest, and what we would really like to have is a one -ton truck
with a utility body, similar to the blue truck used in the water department
but with a 30 -foot single bucket arm -mounted in the bed. A new unit would
coat in the neighborhood of $40,000.
During our search of truck and heavy equipment advertisements and
discussions with several local suppliers of this type of equipment, we did
locate one unit set up exactly as we would like it in Grand Rapids,
Michigan, for $8,996. We also found a van in Minot, North Dakota, for
$14,000. The van, however, would be less suited to the dual purpose use
which we intend for the vehicle. And, before I could get comments back
from the Council that would allow us to purchase the unit Brom Grand
Rapids, it was sold, and the van has also been sold. Consequently, we need
some pre -authorization to move toward purchase of a used or new vehicle.
The following is a summary of some of the uses for the vehicle.
1. Changing traffic signal bulbs at five complete intersections in the
city.
2. Changing bulbs on elevated poles such as the lights in the city hall
parking lot, commuter parking lot, and parka throughout the city.
3. Changing, repair, and maintenance of the "Your Kind Of Place"
banners throughout the city.
4. General tree trimming throughout the community.
6. Roof access to such access as the public works building. This building
is approximately 24 R high and has no permanent access outside or
inside tho building.
6. General transportation for moving men and equipment for the street
and parks department.
7. Painting of buildings and signals and ornamental poles throughout
the community.
S. Installation and removal of Christmas decorations.
9. Flag pole and flag maintenance.
10. Clock maintenance at city hall tower.
21
Council Agenda - 6/6/96
11. Bulb changes in the public works buildings—the lights in the vehicle
storage building are elevated 19 R above the floor.
These are some of the uses that would be most common or routine.
The first alternative would be to direct City staff to draw up
specifications for a new one -ton truck with bucket at an estimated
cost of $40,000 and advertise for bids.
The second alternative wou,a be to authorize City staff to purchase a
used vehicle equipped similar to the truck previously found in Grand
Rapids, Michigan, and authorize expenditures between $10,000 and
$20,000 to purchase the vehicle.
The third alternative would be to continue to rent a bucket truck
where applicable and contract out all of the other work and purchase
a used pickup instead of a dual purpose vehicle.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator, Public Works Director,
and Street & Parks Superintendent that the City Council authorize either
alternative U1 or alternative 112. The 1998 Budget has $8,000 in it for the
used pickup, $1,800 for rental and, if needed, $21,600 budgeted for a small
loader and trailer. If the loader fluids are needed for the bucket truck, we
could put off that purchase until next year. In addition, one would think
that we could use a small amount of the state -aid maintenance funds for
the purchase of a truck to be used for maintaining traffic signals.
Consequently, the funds would be available for either the purchase of a
used vehicle or a new one.
I have checked with other communities to see how they handle this
problem. The City of Buffalo and the City of Elk River don't have a
problem, as their utility departments have bucket trucks. The City of Big
Lake uses similar methods which we were using. They use someone in the
bucket of a loader or they often stand a step ladder up in the back of a
dump truck. Mike, flrom their public works department, realizes that they
will have to make a change also. We talked a little bit about joint use of a
bucket truck, and he indicated that most of their problems come on late
evening hours or on the weekends; and if we had a joint use, they would
have to have a key to our facility to come over here and get it or we'd have
22
to contract with them to do it and, with our short work staff, it may not be
applicable or workable. Also, if the coats for the trucks are reasonable and
can be used for other purposes, it may be best for each City to have their
own.
Copy of memos from Berkley Administrators: Copies of information on two
Umcke that we had originally found but both were sold.
23
Berkley Administrators d -�
. nr,sba at me Serldey Risk Management Services Group
eU, we fi= aadarard P06=69143 Aeneas 5545 ataa (612)5"-=',
March 28, 1995 S~ Q
Mr. Richard Wolfsteller, City Administrator ` , ! Y"3
City of Monticello x`r
250 E. Broadway;{-`
Monticello, MN 55362
Dear Mr. Wolfsteller:
This letter reports on my visit and subsequent workers' compensation safety survey of selected
portions of your city's facilities on March 23, 1995. The body of this report outlines specific and
potentially hazardous conditions I noted during the survey and my recommendations for their
abatement.
General City Recommendations
During my discussion with John Simola, Public Works Director, he indicated that a safety
coordinator has not yet been designated. The Minnesota OSHA AWAIR program recommends
that each facility appoint the most appropriate person within their facility to manage their safety
and health program. This individual will oversee and organize all the components of the city's
safety program. I recommend that the city work diligently to appoint one individual as safety
coordinator for the City of Monticello. Also during this discussion, we reviewed the Job Safety
Analysis fortes. li=topicaf traffic light repair and city decoration installation was discussed. It .
was brought to my attention that employees ride in the bucket of the front end loader to repur ..
traffic fights and install decorations. This practice must be ceased immediately. This could result
!n wifreme kriou3wrorkefre compensation injury or even death. I recommend that the city 1
!strongly pursue the purchase of a aerial bucket truck or other man rated lifting equipment for
t i—ese types ofoperations4
Maintenance Garage
One of the breakers located within the breaker panel was missing. I recommend that the City of
Monticello install a dead -man plate over the area where the breaker has been removed.
carer r rwwrr...�rr.r w rp wn �w rr �.�.� r ww r w.r
cur wry. wrM ar r• r'ea/ r r r.r.
hMt r �rti r ear..nr� r M M eaa..� r rr� w.r. � err.
wrrw .rrw r rwe w rr. a ier.r e. e..rrr �.� r...r a 4ww
Sell -Funded Insuance SpedaWs
M Etpad OPPOM0 ty E0
�I1.1t�A�Hi� LEASE AGREEMENT ANO INVOICE UHIUINAL
LESSOR:
..�.R ...a.R1�.1...., N— Y
INVOSCENO. R 6739
1HOMLLSEW1AYEm kI.AM Pp1STRIN,.ik
tiDpRIGTOLAA SSIA ❑ IIORnaENN. DD® ❑RD. am
'0 aD D®.5w. n7Y,PA IHm
InnAo�E
� REMIT t0: I
A /RSR MAONPE RD w
❑.AwR,uStor ❑ EA/RMtO ROpMOODwY G ❑LLO1 aT.MERO
I S0912-0749
wAAR$uwaw OMTIOTIENCmalMINNEAFOOS,
Dlalalam PMIwAEw oonsm
MN 5548E -07A9
L STpEET
CUSTOMER ACCOIPIT NO
OUT �/9S
9 CITY, TAT 21P !
TWE OF COMMENCEwENi
1 RENTAL
BIWE
RATE AMOUNT
No PNGMi AALEENNI
THa►1voR:Ecov vEROD
NNIS OF PROPERTY OWNER'
A
O
TO
WX,
O
STREET AGME53CI PROPERTY
el
HpUR10E IE
CIAeY
IN
a2,3D 60
ICOIYITY
NOUIWETER
(STATE
IT
OUT
CICITY
13 LESSEE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ON TMq 481
HOLM OPEPATED
R
Y YES ❑ NO (—] (w -mr. am OIPORIIATWN BUM
ErmA TUFT
Cl/AROE
T(MME DP GENE RAL CONTRACTOR
I
RA TES QUOTED ARE FOR S NR.
DAY. 40 NR. WEEN CR 176 NR.
HAILING
N�ADOREB$
MONTH. MOURS IN EXCESS OF
ONE ONE. SHIFT Wlll 68
AT R
NEL
51XPNNp W$TPoVOTONS
OP UMGrEC MATtl.
EOUVMENT VALUE T:>
L/�V
REPAIRS
(FOS
fEY PURCHASE OPTION OVEN:
M.Xc-' � ksas�.-•� MIOUkL /'� �s C]�j
YES ANO
w n / ND OPTn Am",Ie m au
TEM �'}'7j� N�! E1 M�A0L'�T+S_ _. _ G_•J. TFHPE WPCMAAOPfON6
URGHN,BE PRICE WILL 69C(i�
'ORAL OP I/EH TAI PND. PLUS A
CI . CARAYWO CMARGE COMPUTED
Y` RM9.a.��
AT THEOUTTSTN
u IpNG PWayAL STATE SALES TAE
Y i1�. REPAWD TWD GYRASE EXPCH3H$�—
A H \ ` M M � t TIS gj%CHAE@ IOCAL ENES TM
{
T Jr (RMS ND ORIGINAL OINAL TERM Sull
IKANSI ALL RENTALO ARE TOTAL ?!IN sr
11 - PAYASLO IN ADVANCE LPA 980
z �/ \ OTNERIWI3E DTAiED. OELESS
P'POO
7T1
/�Af�.`f IW1E Ip TAf EXIMPT CINfVG,SNO EAIt/ 9�
ou
JA Net ` SU13JECT TO THE TERMS AN000N01T10N
REV 4W PAGE
HEREOF. WHICH ARE MADE APART HEREOF AS IF FULLY SET
POM HEREIN ABOVE.
1 HAVE READ THE TEND AMC C09011040 OF THC( UIAW AGREEMENT AND
AGRES THERETO,
UM GOIwJ��IAH; F_+AQYNrN.wYrw rXw...t!kL:ktT
Gv �CI[I�IN iA`
R Dome No. A 6739 �%8
GENERAL FUND
1995
BUDGET
PW/STREETS 6 ALLEYS
PERSONAL SERVICES
Salaries, full-time - req:
101.43120.1010
96,775
Salaries, full-time - OT:
101.43120.1020
2,000
Salaries, temporary - req:
101.43120.1040
7,000
PERA contributions:
101.43120.1210
4,740
FICA contributions:
101.43120.1220
6,560
Medicare contributions:
101.43120.1250
1,535
Health/dental/life insurance:
101.43120.1310
15,400
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
134,010
SUPPLIES
Clothing supplies:
101.43120.2111
750
Motor fuels:
101.43120.2120
10,000
Lubricants 6 additives:
101.43120.2130
1,500
Misc operating supplies:
101.43120.2199
20,000
Equipment repair parts:
101.43120.2210
3,000
Vehicle repair parts:
101.43120.2211
3,500
Misc repair & mtc supplies:
101.43120.2299
100
Small tools 6 equipment:
101.43120.2410
11000
Misc merchandise for resale:
101.43120.2999
500
TOTAL SUPPLIES
40,350
OTHER SERVICES 6 CHARGES
Mise profoosicnal services:
101.43120.3199
1,500
Telephone:
101.43120.3210
375
Conference 6 schools:
101.43120 3320
200
Repair 6 mtc - mach i equip:
101.43120.4044
11500
Repair 6 mtc - vehicles:
101.43120.4050_
1,900
e.. mow ^ -*101.43120.4170 _— c
SaMAgplen500
1:900
Uni orm rbentalarntar
Licenses 6 permits:
101.43120.4370
390
Misc other expense:
101.43120.4399
500
TOTAL SERVICES 6 CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6,325
Improvements: 30 1.43120.5301 27,30
,.0�3�471]0:550.Li��[8
Other equipment: 101.43120.5801 23 -ii
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 61,000
TOTAL PW/STREETS i ALLEYS 241,685
oaivaar� vzn: 1
Q?C,
ISSUE 1u)
. v. .... . -- -F -
fiberglass util. body, 6 new tires, about 114 the co
more to choose from. J&M ENTERPRISES, 2960
Grand Rapids, 616.247-8423. (RM) (9517) R
:'.
r:X•.
PAG
ket, Kohler qen.,
st of new, 8.995
S. Division Ave.,
M-62015Rw31 Tn-
10.133 IF, �vce civ
moo, coo
4 t3 �e4 ,es - --- - - - ----- - - .
N cul
A004'
Ram atr Z %otue M+►a.. t%s A .�� ' _ .3Z} f %E. •
Geo e�� ; ►tea ---_ _.._ . .
D
2ND $TRE
5333
p
HOPKINS, MN 553438337
3.8337
612.938.5451
Equ'ipment & Supply Inc.
FAX 1-612.93MI 59
WATS 1-800.729.5451
Custom Truck Equipment for the Utility, Construction, Municipal and Refuse industries
April 5, 1995
Roger Mack
City of Monticello
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MH 55362
Dear Roger,
Enclosed are the photo's of the aerial lift we spoke of. This van
is currently at the City of Minot, but they have not committed to
buying it yet. It is available for $14,000.
The truck came from Anoka Electric Coop. It is in very good
condition and I can give you a contact at Anoka Electric if you
would like to give him a call. I do not anticipate this truck
being available much longer, so give me a call if you are
interested.
Thank you for your interest in ABM Equipment & Supply, Inc.
Sincerely,
C[ !b1 it bW W/LAA St v
Ron Zimmer
Sales Representative
RzIsm
SdrOV You Me bsdl nuns An Cu bwhmsa I f
An EQw+ Y Empb er I I
I
333 2nd Street WE
Hoplon3, MN 55343-8337
PAI. 1-613-938-0159
FAX COVER SHEET
PLEASE DIALCCT THE POLLOMIMG PAGES TOS
Q
P'A>C TF2ASASM28920N is , •�_'a • �+. �..
r-.9�� �/YU�/
r r
7io
FROM
0.e.n 4Q.r�e-uy��
$L,(.60c) N6 io,
O
1t-MsSAa
c,. ,LA t b .
NAA`V
M
PZ -MASE
•
Council Agenda - 5/8/95
18. Coffin ideration 91 uurchaes of reulaoement mower for the parka
department. (J.SJ
City Staff would like the Council to consider replacement of a 1985, 650
John Deere Tractor with a 72" belly -mount mower. In addition to mowing
services, the 650 John Deere is used in the winter as a light duty snow
blower for sidewalk and skating rink maintenance. It is anticipated that
the 650 John Deere will be kept in service for winter use and as a backup
mower for summertime.
The City currently has three heavy duty mowers for park use. The John
Deere 650 has been the most troublesome and is on its second complete
mower deck as well as other problems. The following is a list of the three
pieces of heavy duty mowing equipment:
1985 650 John Deere Tractor, diesel with 72" belly -mount mower, cab
and snow blower. (2,260 hours)
1988 Toro Mower with 23 horsepower diesel engine and front -
mounted 72" mower with rollover protection and canopy. (2,485
hours)
1990 955 John Deere Tractor with 72" belly -mount mower, diesel
engine, cab, avow blower and broom. (1,650 hours)
The majority of the repairs needed for the John Deere tractors lately have
been mower deck and drive system related. Just for 1994 alone, parte for
the John Deeres totaled $1,142, while parte for the Toro totaled $117. To
obtain prices and general speacations, we took quotes on John Deere
equipment as well as Toro equipment. Size wise, the John Deere &ont-
mounted mower, model F935 with a 72" mower at $11,287.20, compares
with the Toro, model CM223-D with a 72" side discharge front -mounted
deck at $11,594. The Toro unit, which compares more closely with our
existing Toro unit, however, is the model GM325-D with a fionbmountad
72" mower, this unit sells for $12,488. This unit offers a 25 horsepower
3 cyl. diesel engine, an industrial radiator (which is less likely to plug up
with grass), heavy duty automotive type drive axle, single peddle
hydrostatic drive, and four link steering. The deck on the Toro unit is
extremely heavy duty, with 1-1/4" spindles and tapered roller bearings,
reinforced spindle housing with 11 gauge steel decks with heavy duty gear
boxes, gauge wheels, and anti -scalp rollers. The Toro aroundsmasters have
a 2 -year warranty, and staff believes they offer the lowest life cycle total
24
Council Agenda - 5/8/95
cost and less down time than our experience has been with the John Deere
mower deck system. With almost 100 acres in our park inventory system,
total life cycle cost is extremely important.
In preparation for this purchase, we placed an amount of $15,000 in the
budget.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to purchase the Tom Groundsmaster front -
mounted mower, model GM326-D, from MTI Distributing Company in
Plymouth, Minnesota, for an amount of $12,488 plus sales tax.
2. The second alternative would be to purchase the Toro
Groundsmaster, model GM223-D with 72" firont-mounted mower deck,
from MTI Distributing Company in Plymouth, Minnesota, for $11,684
plus sales tax. This unit is slightly smaller than the current Toro we
have.
3. The third alternative would be to purchase the John Deere, model
F935 front -mounted mower, from Scharber & Sons Equipment of
Rogers, Minnesota, for $11,287.20 plus sales Lax.
4. The fourth alternative would be to do nothing at this time but to
continue using our existing mowing equipment. GN GS sju oc
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Park/Street
Superintendent that the City Council authorize the purchase of the Toro
Groundsmaster, model GM325-D with 72" front -mounted mower deck, from
MTI Distributing Company of Plymouth, Minnesota, in the amount of
$12,488 as outlined in alternative 01. It is our opinion that this unit will
provide the lowest life cycle cost with the lowest down time of the units we
have looked at. We have several years of direct experience with both types
of mower equipment upon which we make our recommendation.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of quotes from MTI Distributing Company and Scharber k Sons.
25
/lardi�
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO.
Tuesday, May 02, 1995
Roper Mads
Monticeito d4' of
PO Box 1 147
Monticello, Mn 55382
Dear Roger
We are pleased to quote prices on the fol lowing 9*dprrent.
OTY ESCRIPTION QUO
1 GM 325-0 72 In SO deck, M seal, and 4 post ROPS
$12,488.00
1 GM 325-0 with 72 in Guardian Reeycier Deck, Dix seat, and
4 post ROPS with canpy $14,337.00
Note Add 6.5% State Sales Tax
Equipment would be set up, serviced, and delivered covered under standard
I you have any questions please cell me at 612-4752200 6d 228
sU,�erely,
Don Mersdrnan
Cwmwcisl Sales
14900 TW"-ftAvenue North • PtymouN, MWresota 514474855 •Phone (812)4752200 •Fax (812147
p
SPEC I F I CATION S
72" EXXGM CAPACITY 7RIMMINC3
MOWER
MINIMUM DEVIATIONS FROM
SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS
ENGINE Mitsubishi, Model R3D-61TG, 3-cyl., 1
(DIESEL) 4 cycle, 69.7 cu. in. (979 cc) 1
displacement, water cooled diesel 1
engine, 26 hp at 3260 RPM, 3.6 quart
oil capacity with replaceable filter,
hand primer pump, heavy duty remote 1
mounted air cleaner, and extra large 1
spark arrestor muffler for excellent 1
silencing. 1
1
RADIATOR Mid -mounted industrial radiator with 1
tube and fin construction; 7 fine per 1
inch. 6 quart capacity. Stamped brass 1
top and bottom tanks. Thermally stable 1
water cooled hydrostatic system 1
regulates operating temperature. 1
I
FUEL CAPACITY 6.2 gallons No. 1 or No. 2 diesel fuel. 1
I
CONTROLS }lend operated throttle, PTO, glow plug 1
switch and hydraulic implement lift. 1
I
GAUGES AND ENGINE flour motor, ammeter, water temperature 1
PROTECTION SYSTEMS gouge, high engine temperature shut-off,1
and electric fuel gauge. Oil pressure
warning light and buzzer. Glow plug 1
indicator. 1
I
ELECTRICAL 12 Volt, 660 amp, cold cranking perform -1
FEATURES once at 0 degrees F. maintenance free 1
battery. Dash mounted ignition switch, 1
36 amp alternator, 40 amp manual reset 1
circuit breaker. Seat switch, PTO and 1
trnction interlock switches.
I
TRACTION Variable speed, axial piston hydrostaticl
DRIVE trnnomission mounted on an automotive 1
type axle/roarend, Dano OT20 axle - 1
20.9:1 ratio. Single foot pedal control 1
of forward/reverse ground speed. BAB 1
1OW30 SF -SC engine oil, approx. 6 quart 1
oil capacity. 1
S P E C I F S C A T I O N S C O N T I N U E D:
72" HIGH CAPACITY TRIMMING
MOWER
MINIMUM
DEVIATIONS FROM
SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATIONS
I
GROUND SPEED
0-9.5 mph, infinitely variable.
I
CLEARANCE
Ground clearance 7.5".
1
TIRES/V/BSELS/
Two rear steering tires 16 x 6.50'
1
1
PRESSURES
x 8, tubeless ribbed, 4 ply rating.
1
Two front traction drive tires 23 x
1
8.50 x 12, tubeless, 4 -ply rating.
1
MAIN FRAME
All welded formed steel reinforced.
1
1
BRAKES
Individual 7" x 1.76" drum type wheel
I
I
brakes and parking brakes on front
1
traction wheels. Dynamic braking
1
through traction drive.
1
STEERING
Hydraulic priority flow power steering.
I
I
15" steering wheel.
1
SEAT
Deluxe adjustable suspension seat.
1
1
IMPLEMENT DRIVE
1-1/8" - 20 splined PTO shaft is driven
1
1
by n tight -slack double "A" section,
1
torque teem V -belt. Anti -side load
1
system proftecte the crankshaft output
A
bearings.
IMPLEMENT LIFT
2 1/2" - lift cylinder actuates a T -bar
I
AND TRACTION
of 2" square tubing with chains for
COUNTER BALANCE
implement lift. Two large torsion
springs counterbalance implements for
greater stability and traction.
CERTIFICATION
Certified to meet ANSI specifications
I
i
871.4.1984, and applicable Federal
1
•
and State OSTIA regulations based
1
thereon.
1
WEIGHT
1250 lba. tractor.
1
I
1
I
1
��C
I
SPEC I F I CAT I O N S
72" HIGH CAPACITY TRIMMING
MOWER
MINIMUM DEVIATIONS FROM.
SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS
72" SIDE DISCHARGE CUTTING UNIT
TYPE
72" (163 cm) width of cut, three blade,
mounted rotary.
MOWING RATE
Mows up to 3.8 acres/hr. (1.5hecteres/hr.)
at 6.5 mph (8.9 km/hr) depending on
conditions.
TRIMMING
Deck offset to the right from centerline:
ABILITY:
18" (46 cm). Deck trim width from outside
of std. traction tire to trim side -Right:
23" (58 cm). Uncut circle right: 15".(38cm);
uncut circle w/use of wheel brakes: 0"
(Rear discharge trim both sides).
HEIGHT OF
1-4" (2.6-10 cm) adjustable front and rear
CUT:
in .5" (13 mm) increments.
CONSTRUCTION
11 gauge steel, 6" (15 cm) deep with
2" (5 cm) step. Reinforced with
3.5" (8.9 cm) x 7 gouge channel.
CUTTER DRIVE
Iaolntion mounted PTO driven gearbox with
1.26:1 opiral bevel gears. "B" section
belts to spindles. 1.25" (3.2 cm) diameter
spindle shafts protected by rugged conical
housing, turn on two greasable tapered
roller bearings. A positive apllned connec-
tion attaches pulleys to spindle shafts for
high torque capacity.
BLADES
Three 25" long, (63.5 cm) long, .25" (6mm)
think, heat treated steel, auction -lift
blades.
SUSPENSION
Two front and rear canter tires consist of
Al BASTER
hard rubber and roller bearings.
W1fisdLS
Front tiros: 10.26" x 3.25" (26 x 8.3 cm).
L#9
SPECIFICATIONS CONTINUED
72" 112GH CAPACITY TRIMMING
MOWER
O/PF
MINIMUM
DEVIATIONS FROM
SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATIONS
.
1
1
Rear tires: 6.25" x 3" (16 x 7.6 cm)
1
Deck counterbalanced by two torsion
1
springs.
1
1
ANTI -SCALP
One front center anti -scalp roller end
1
FEATURES
two rear center anti-scnlp rollers-
1
All rollero are two -position adjustable
1
1
WEIGHT
400 lbs. (181 kg)
1
1
CERTIFICATION
All equipment bid must be certified to
1
meet the American National Standard
1
Institute's (ANSI) specifications,
1
871.4-1984 and applicable Federal and
1
State regulations based thereon.
1
WARRANTY
Two yearn or 1,600 operational hours,
1
1
whichnver comes first.
1
1
OPTIONS
2 or 4 p not ROPS With Canopy, Cab W/RO PS
1
- BO " 2 Stege Snow Blower, Rotary Brooms,
1
(Mechanical or All Hydraulic Drive),
1
Slit Seeder, Wide Tires. Tire Chain,
1
Wheel Weights, Cruise Control 6 Arm Rests.
I
O/PF
Groundstnaster 300 Series
��^ - ,r, .r. 'i!t 'R{ -i : �.i� :iT. :id a�i?::•i: ii 7.:
'-. '?r .:.Yi«•,_'•,:ir'<1.:'�`i�rs.'. ;.•r!=ar`C: '>;,«:.`a:t-'•�:.:. n::�:. ^.w..+•!'" ,ssS';�f�i,�::��'{
�'
_. .... +r-�I
.."'' 1►i' „�. _''�• l}}.... tit-' �,�-� � 1 :.#...:.,.
.. -' • , y .. I :c .L y �_��,% is
.:u F�,�1,• '. ,l^ � '• ,t ` may`` K� .
The Proven
Performers
For 30 years commernal mowing
professionals have put
Groundsmaster` 300 tines
through rigorous tests against time
and terrain. And for °0 years the
300 Series continue to t4• the
preferred choice among these same
professionals. They have come to
rely on these commercial mowers to
handle even the most extreme
cutting conditions with unmatched
productivity.
The prolan performers. Long on
durability. Tight on turns. With
power to spare. Today the 3W
Series continue to advance Your
expectations in measures of
reliability. efficiency and
unsurpassed quality of cut.
Whatever your situation or
application. there's a
Groundsmaster to sere your
nmost demands.
operator performance making the
job easier, faster and ultimately
more profitable. To that end. there's
front wheel drive. rear wheel rower
steering, single pedal
forward. reverse action, a compact
wheelbase and individual drum
wheel brakes. All for incredihle.
smrnlh tontrul and effonles
maneuverability whether tnmmmg
close. transposing or tradepiiag: 1
?6
engine efficiencies and keep you on
Power-
the job.
And routine servicing is so
simple it promotes itself. Designed
Packed
to open wide with conveniently
located. easy -to -reach components.
Service life is optimized with
saves you time and fosters proper
these liquid cooled performers,
servicing.
gines, either
r 45 hp—gas, offer
t�,,'etplenty ofIncredible
power. Thgas powerful 345 gas
version has its power regulated and
reserved to effectively increase
Control
torque and power while reducing
noise and vibration. It also equips a
Distributodess Ignition System for
Groundsmaster design continues
increased reliability and less
to evolve m response to the specific
downtime.
demands of today's turf
Fully pressurized lubrication,
professional, even meeting futureexpectations.
heavy duty air cleaners, industrial
Tum understands that
sized radiator and engine protection
exacting control. superior traction
systems go a long way to enhance
and a comfortable ride improves
operator performance making the
job easier, faster and ultimately
more profitable. To that end. there's
front wheel drive. rear wheel rower
steering, single pedal
forward. reverse action, a compact
wheelbase and individual drum
wheel brakes. All for incredihle.
smrnlh tontrul and effonles
maneuverability whether tnmmmg
close. transposing or tradepiiag: 1
?6
Traction -
Plus
'rracllon and stahl6t,• are the
emphasis with extra large turf tree
rues and. a cuounterhaIance system
that automatically transfers weight
between the deck and tractor when
performance demands additional
traction.
For enhanced traction the
. ._ - .t
d6rRwescels in traction where
competitive two -wheel differential
lock fires can't.
overrunning clutch that prevents
rear wheel skidding in turns and
ensures excellent traction,
Operator
Comfort
llr-iding Groundsmtnh•r
reraans with ewellent control
the fatigue experienced
rmm a lung day's nde And a
wuJurtahlr Ipelalur's,lalwn arch
e\allcnt ylslhlltty extents to
:I m, stent �gvrat, lr rVn. IITna nee
and pr,ductnn,'
F,.r ultimate c. -mf -r tllc high
team :u,hl„c ddu,e
u,penslon seat Jdlu,ls :o
ndnldual operator. "eight and
length. Amlrc,t, am -rd relayed
st;enng plus the ,teenng wheel
tilt, 6n individual ,teenng
rn•terence.
a 2
Easy tlm��unt and dl+mount.
; unaurerrd Iri�hlr „tau�ln
r•\:de,, ^:\.a GnN n„gym „rth
Il,enwr t\\ 'I,ea:ej ',,-a k, and
alnd-j'C%cv .,heel
rumor. `:h.l Jrd'I„k n-gether
.al—Th e\cn lI::kmg ^ et
nil. panel
1:1-1 eJ`\ ' •eJd 4Jn9e1 N I
rlt•111r4 ellr:lre Ilm.:lln, and
h.Lt .r, . • „� J,.I,c ,t, enol
�mr,.0 t , •,I�• rr,�dl..•iun
"od ur” •I nnl•, 1.011
J, a:• 1I.1lrm,m
i,,., •"JI', .ir,lhlllly 'a
Versatile Cutting Unit Family,
�i��n�s GrotntJmas0.'1 -:.. tii�lr!
,•t�e.ti (.h.i aargr l Utitn„ i Ilit>
hace a 1 Olin( �.Il iot cutting til
...ear ai1J a, speed+ tit;t: -id
l i,110hlc hutlt With i i gau•'Se
,trel o,n>truan rt, hrall'Juh
sputdlr h„uan} •. <phnrd spmJh
tapered ndler hearing. and
'•: eIJrJ blade tlloc
deiiis are mr,re ruslged, Tgwir
It'ss sen'Icing and klm I-,nger.
1)ptmtall} dessgneJ. a deep ,i
l mJ Tunnel' hou.'Ing .md thi ec n Jl>pr si„n - at no lo,, ,,f
_i Madcs create super -T 1'acuu m ipced.
,,calm for a smooth. evocut. F. w .• did rl.:hhar deck caster
cci>:•pamize gro,:nd toni,ntr
Fine Cut
Flail 2760
Named (,,I it, high ouahty I
-til and etcepti„nal ..tet; iag
harattrrrtrs.'G m's Fin,' I.
i'i:oi :.,, .e+,r;hrahrrnatae i+a
nt ,%vim your mrmai and semi
t-,rmal turf Th, d76Gi pernam>
with„ut dualling, rnrt even III
h••hes ,.••t gra- dtrJ rtsfull
width rear di�chatge etuthet
enl atico after -cut oppeatance
while it also nta4,rs f,.r sa}vt
,�pelaU,me.
But I, ver�atilitt marhe its
greatest adl'antagc. The time
mower that delivers you a
praiseworthy tut can serve to
I
:aip prim to rnerseeding, hrca”
up ,It r: tmn .ores or mulch Iran'
to v.ithm it the hr,sls -.1 chartgn,t,
adding attachmL nis.
L,II,.s ing. Ssalpum Is %-Irma;};
eLminatedwii"annscal-, fc;:tures
like rn•er>ized aria>caip roiiers
and adnivahie �ktds.
I' • a .ih 1—tof,• -t'lle Il; +flnotml: hla , n-- Lull to
`0 i4 ^reg',ni `,*,.1 11, TA i,tltg
Hnt•I,r e•41 t, •1•,,f: .cl,
Groundsmaster 300 Series Specifications" (continued)
GROUNDSMASTER ACCESSORIES
2 -POST ROLL-OVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE (BOPS)
STATION CUTTING UNITS (continued)
Pour PralK Slr `tt" (r IS MI . 7' 17 6.—,
FILATURES
' SIDE DISCHARGE. MODEL 70722
OvWem Twos COM 9+ ftVuO l R*Mvab0
ovw—
WEIGHT
2•Pow ROPS 175 ibo 101 kg) Canottv Kd IoPIWG • 90
GUARDIAN' 72' RECVCLER',
FINE CUT FLAIL 2760.
4•POST ROLLOVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE
72' REAR DISCHARGE, MODEL 70710
MODEL 70716
MODEL 48590
Poll—Pp ttt,*StntCOaa cwt bot rte WXbf ^T
Dw othial to its rgn km can Aftw IrDaCM
011e�i 0M NM I— C vlft. r (18F
ad .MIM M arts nil 1—
_aebon NAW mo' or"Hunt. Ana rood CuoOC^
14E ani. OKk t— wdtn ftO outdo of
=I. DIC% torn wM Iron pRsde 01 arrtan
cwenrw 4 5- (11 Cm). Tm
TRIMMING
alnrtaan trxnort tom hied; Mee — nam 27'
bn w trop ode — Vtta Zr 156 and Un
troth ttom oMde . of treme
a
ASILM
158 an). U—ti arch —.9m: 15' (78 an),
arae rpm: 2a' 161 and Urtcul rnaa wmt uM
"to ngM tka: 17(70 on)
WEIGHT
~ oral.
Unad arca wvat uta d es 0'
ol x2;0.1 btak— 0' Gaa.man 72' ROCyClor
Lot" o.ae w rate Pae 28'
(B=,Z. roma boot Edea).
aal
t-6 on both s4aa
172 Cm) FLW 2760 trent on
Dot" uda0
14. (25 - 10 cm) adptade Irbtd OW mar m2-5*
IS 1 - 12.7 an) adpstaVii itaa Md ear
0+ (0 - 10 an) aqustaDle
5't 17 mm)-um"-th.)rote on ate
nS'(t7—) —&—ftwW.oK wtea
"MAM rear -.5'(17 mm)
HEIGHT OF CUT
otw tt" ea
c0smr snafu. r IS and neem ol cd ttol
vtcrwltrKa . h ap mii -
rommnrrdao ~ a m oxwq
the 1r 1 case' shaft and two
pondaKwN
cats an ar ear mDM.
No" 70722. 11 gauge It". 6' (15 and
12 gaups at". 5.5' (1a Cm) 0M.waloaa
10 gauge ataal Wusvtg win 7
sp
a*lar 2' (5 Wn) Rao. P wftnAd wth 7.5'
rn trucbon 19W -Ad +rte 10 99,90
gauge areas. WHOM
CONSTRUCTION
(8.9Cm10gauge Cham".
cnenr+0ls ant paw,
rAn.bll Vadatpatl wdh 10
Mtaa17071P 11 gauge at". a' (10 an)
gauge ol—tals ant o"M
GM I MWQ. Rautmrnd wth 73' . 7 gauge
Cna".
Hol. w mwnn PTO orlven gwoo. snot
leolot n MOLMN PTO mtven WV*O..wth
PTO tree n 1:1 rMq ball
12S 1 Wal b" Tan 'S' hal aet b
1 26 1 tarts itgAAre. Swgm 90' &*=A
gel b Two N axbon balm
boot N tpldN. 125' 17.2 Cm) tawN
rte. ben to ap—l". SM•terte 91"
10 =u. Saa•t&eP0i g 4.110
Coto" aMN, pWecNo by n conew
pWao 1.25' (7 2 =) *aM* W WnW0
wt,rnarrtamr diet P+Amy
CUTTER ORWE
4pod'i Wang, tum w 1wb rpesaaama
an.ft, tum on Iwo gtamal";.)alts'ober
125' (7 2 —) patlwlW mm2
taared rats oeamgs (weaseabla ftp" too
DMrnp (graacoabm tr lag of .CF). A
anon one on greasaaba ball
al a ) A Pos,bve sF01Ma conneCoM
Douai" "Pt. 1ad MrvtaOTtbn anacros Pubs"
bean");
.near. punaye m .WO..haft tar rtgn
toque Capably
to apwtale waft ft .p torpua "Itamy
BLADES
TMM 25' 164 Cml mrtp. 25' 1S —1 ft".
Tone 25' (64 an) lug. 25' 16 ren) thck
14 nam "amt hoe PwUN
re ?.nMtvo MMI ouuat4dl pari
Mu•trOpteo a". PKytlw Oman
lmna grabg O 2X10 pm
Two mord Wo nal crew moa ;.anted of Kora lobar wo rCaOr ti—p puck CMAS'niamoo
t- 10' . 7 25'(25 . 8 7 and
SUSPENSION •
tly Ma Iortim spm) Opnonw P tAM VR l a Te Aseempy
tit Kan tlmbw Cmter
CASTER
P N +21509 (too Mawr")
whaaN bei -45
qRw bega
WHEELS
Fqm Tim Raw Tit-
F4t countorpMatrAd by two
Meats. 30722 A 70710 ;0000'.7255 21.667 m) 62!'.700'116.796m:
CootwvgFul woth ear
Meow707111 0072 257m 07 SW 205m
rode,
Moat 377t D: One ft" Center wW.Cam
AnWx Cup WC Cao on oast 040 Thr
ami-SCato aloe bcateo on
ANTI -SCALP
rout' Ono 4n al -r ikda Moots 70722
SMD0 111P 'bale Ada lltb" oda
each art to um. Fus want
FEATURES
ane tmm. ., rd mA rep C.K--liCalc
ra— at ear wm 0M."C a
rp4n aro RH wd
I' 12 5 an) be -0
AD'bean ua 2po aquolaaa
DECK COVERS
Owo1•r0iu.a Caen kb woo mW co to
Ouo "=, hgn vT000 Pta=own" No
Ba:latn-
rewove
mws rppunpd to rMrlwe
- _ .
_470
WEIGHT
MoW 70722 amret 1181 k9:
A6s me (211 Rg) --
ft (213 kg)
Moots 70710 a15 ma I+IM kp)
GROUNDSMASTER ACCESSORIES
2 -POST ROLL-OVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE (BOPS)
STANDARD
Pour PralK Slr `tt" (r IS MI . 7' 17 6.—,
FILATURES
Ira gau00 w.d0a Rddglteal ban am anaMN
OvWem Twos COM 9+ ftVuO l R*Mvab0
ovw—
WEIGHT
2•Pow ROPS 175 ibo 101 kg) Canottv Kd IoPIWG • 90
W owaoe Sworwg on Iyer WON aM Wio Mat hoar
ala 141 491 .Son.-Aw
4•POST ROLLOVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE
ELECTRICAL
WITH SUN ROOF
STANDARD
Poll—Pp ttt,*StntCOaa cwt bot rte WXbf ^T
FEATURES
avc Sun roar wm 1' I2 5 Ml Aragb=l real
WEIGHT
_aebon NAW mo' or"Hunt. Ana rood CuoOC^
WEIGHT
250143 111741)) wwwo ream
"'N o LKFe K0 w rr.wntl.0 not" rNtDar
OPTIONS
h hm Ana DN rota wa"lgnb Iwo Combno; c't
a0't1�om12 tt;.go .uut--,•-•w y,n way
22"}2.1 Md WAql.a "CwtbpD rd.w4'n pYOi
CAB WITH BOPS
Roo-" PgmCb1.O 6lttctuto CMI boll AM Anxnrg
STANDARD
OvWem Twos COM 9+ ftVuO l R*Mvab0
FEATURES
OW wad Ipueg hartSe V 12 S —1 atmtcxdl root
W owaoe Sworwg on Iyer WON aM Wio Mat hoar
p•7rtol, "" 010v ft r Ml nEew 001020' m t* Mo
ELECTRICAL
Two 1400" One notes -W W" 40Wwtp atttbp
FEATURES
can't; oahOclO, Nn w CCrnAto wow wrap Na %
and Ng-J:O awuuwt
WEIGHT
WO t3 It67 kgl
OPTIONS
koala U Road L74 Kd h.0 CpabN WN 4-
rvta-,-17'N
a-,- 1"mnrwa iwpaa.g h .N.W. ,d -q
48' (122 cm) SNOW BLOWER. MODEL "910
DTANOARO
a0't1�om12 tt;.go .uut--,•-•w y,n way
FEATURES
Wccmm aa'N taxa. rAKnCaay ban er appRlp o
Wt• te0
WEIGHT
v
400oa 1181 k9)
Groundsmaster® 300 Series Specifications*
(GROUNDSMASTER 1250, 2 WHEEL DRIVE — DIESEL.
GROUNDSMASTER 115, 2 WHEEL DRIVE —OAS.
MODEL 10789 GROUNDSMASTER 2"."i WHEEL DRIVE — DIESEL,
MODEL 10795
F. + C ....... cvm,wwnetw were, 4.0coo w g.. qv. Mawbrw. ] CyknoAl. a cyC* varxal wwftsao v . kala coo4a
nim can,Nupal+ater Purm Fw" orgm ramp a 4 m(33 6 kW):
W); aral anpm.rml n mdugM water Pro. 25 m 118.6 kW) 1I 2850
pwlmeo la • ra..nu11 speed 011250 "Pt" 67 a n 1 11 00
al rpn ratan.arm
Pd la a mlarklrrh wan d 3
250 rprn
.
a aolacwrom Dgtrloaanest y)ru sywam, wan q controw 111' a S9 7 eu n (979 a) CIMPlaanlarll Than wan ueul pbr au9a 12
CLS Sona wort tccmarx nv&Ae. 3 5 awn (3 3 marl W cap"; wln 12 0 WA gow MMci mei parts tori wltanod Facey kohCenpn
ENGINE 1t cta ft a law %otaGtae two Lan Forpea CbuleCVp ruts. v+m Iroopa Pip 1.5 atop (3.3 Mas at caac+y: raphcaaUk a
cut .On 6ybtpar "m oto tlbck momar al Itcil pm near Duty Wqr FoFW cc, *M p rpm. Caw ilei CybrOw head and bloCk Fut
remora mpumw as daprtw. Span —w moll,. n SAlhpata •Vtcwrl pip 12 ten o1Kvc tuel Pop wit atacmc kW wino
Rtp,acenk; W heir/ ziw aparwb vat 3 m fmawn popo-
awh la waw rtnb w H" duty. rwnote mora a wr mow
Spin ammtr n.AM o "'",a
FUEL CAPACRTy c 5 pa�0rn 12A B Meryl umaa0ea gawknt - 6 5 paAPa R+ 6 hen). Td0 l a 2 oeSM heel. -- —
CONTROLS 'rarowpwalta trOt'.r. CrtaS. PTO lryaat8c unpile- 411 am RarhOopwwAO Gnome. PTO, hyanultc mpMmwa M uta
!cal-opwplaa won Dada1 laago•rbat AaCaarh pedal
GAUGES S Amnww, t-, n taw P.D.. ""m rmporanre twnthyhpe Antm.w n0l+ rales. Ik+al Pupa COaare rampentun sl.tcnpav9a
DMONOSTICB lcrwtw owe -alanyl. p0 pntoure.armn9 kpht am ouzzw (O?+waa orearabpI. cm Friar vwn g kpm arra buzz. ply..
ptup twNN.gcata
12 voo oabarV, 370 amp. cola crag ,V pM--, NO F (-ta CI Maw. tray 12 .on bm" 630 tip. cab uar"
ELECTRICAL Dam nlotw,M, Ito ewntoh. 55 orb epernatpr Sal PTO dna ptnamama at 0 F (.18 CI Dash ri, n pnpen e.mce 35 amp
FEATURES Vacutln uner&.Ck twNCtoa. aatnim b VM M11-81 mel aCLl btakw Seal. PTO aro
trOdM .0plack Swchot
WEIOM Apap. 1.300 M 1380 kpl oY wa1Vn M.M 307U AM- 1.250te 1567 k91 ay to
Moral 30795 bap. 1.665 Ea (755 41 CIV�: vtc clas ROPS
SPECIFICATIONS COMMON TO GROUNDSMASTER 300 SERIES PRUE MOVERS
RADIATOR Lto.-0ua -game, raaata with tlae am M comYwctw 7 hrm pa nM A=m, 6Oran 15 7 btoo dewy Saito" top ata 001,0- tante
nT rryaaukC Cwtc,, n 1pww Lank TWma7t Sino* welt, Cpolea hycl m SytLam "Lem aDor+b9 larnpw (tmuau aawna0yl
VANDIO tpetla a.la wW paten, myab mei w t.awnaegn. awgo c—t,I hymauW vm 25 naC.ar Ufaton patao hyatWc "m fit, 00 0,
Ana .mbrrtON tor, Tnrdm:Non meat w ams ane 20 9.1 toaU law. awro 5 mo 14 7 wr) oft kocam ce%my Snple bol naw Cb1aa
TRACTION DRIVE w tawansfP prawn weed 011ealal Vomt nc Cmo,to Ceara K0, Moot 30677 sv&Wo
Ltem) 30795 Rea a.lo m maChatKWy amort rrom hone ane ty a urkv.aw waft M 0rt,arnano owrwtwp nice prap'tnLa rtnr bra ew"mp
m tuna arta -a.Aaro W—V ,paw AVV O 1 8 a+an 11 8 Merl baa IL&tCmn Caaxzy
IMPLEMENT DRIVE 1.1 8 (2 9 Cm) wkma PTO Shalt o"n by t IQM-V ck OoLd*'A' "Cbon.,abut Nam y.pae An wwoM loo ayatem praoM the _
AND LIFT CrankanM OLdN boaapO Let cvw4r 2 5'- 3.25'16 A . 0.3 and actual» a T -ow at r IS mi aquas su ct.N k&N Lath wnvaam
aaam.rp Chan ICr .-,pari aft. Twp Larpt IOrctOn Woo wUVOtbaLarttt .rb oro Ib proaWt Watt" Nia nctw
Hyaauh[ pamw woamp w IontrO waw am --army toxon whU rOphwbb Port tm mPIMa caw to 9* mip comcw SLaw.p valva.^
STEERING rtaturta prbrl7 now wn.d+atwmaxaay port to aim" It—bait, 13' 133 C -I a�mnMr wo.rp r.nIFR Tm 61amp wrlpa wm+a 15 -rpt pr
mp.wmm rertw0 and Inc" ov a woo la.w COrwd
GROUND SPEEN 0.95-M(0.15,3 kmT). ddmcty nram
CLEARANCE F�ap aoula cW rartca of 7 r (19 on) Meat 30795 roc brae- acaatn a A r 111 ml
Tva Imnl Trecwn amt ata — 22 r 950.17 tlDOlaa. etre badmt trbn0, agly relay Ourltlsgnbb atop cape IarhO " —_ '
TIR[SaeNCH W TM MOM aw — IAwaM 307899076616 r 6 r`..GB. alOtpaa. ttab0 Ma. +alr retry MC0030795 18.0 50-0. ItA)OMOS. entre
PRESSURE paCtan tnao. nary ramp. Tn preaVaO 21 pot (1+5 kPa). Opaont were woe bm W rim 23 . 10 W 12 ilDaalaa. agcy ralrp. Port N0
62.7020 Irtm OCplKtdb w7rn uaAp lalibp tM "ft 30710)
MAINFRAME WoMcl CamMOM weal W40rtta with Satao Cm reaarpteat ttmnp
!RAKES Ulatmua r . 1.76' (17 S .4 t MI ohan type .mew t-koa. Ptrk.p awe w ban now w h.W dynein burp rm ph aotLOrl anw
BEAT Obwtwl Ho OdCk CjSNW mol. MOW 30708. a oakaa OquaaOM atuptntorh Sal Matt 307" 16aaI Ada" 141, Moat 30709 r.q oo ..
nM ]0772)
?
STORAGE uemo. ww 10.11 town Caw Iom%KJ n Nnmr Oprator macaw alprlpo taw turnSlra to taecrhmer m eat trPno. ---
COMPARTKPM
wAARANTT Trq yotm a 1500 opt ab" hen rtxlrvor cora Wa. Ratty to IM apprepnna OrrV,inp31V300 gala Clporamn' Ma.W to turogr
.Aro
CERT61CAT70M Oratnaarrm:ror 300 Derma pr.rw -nary am rOSpry 10ltatp tM ore CtMra m met ar Anrtxyt N+taW SLampm bbtNlat S (ANSII
t.WCOtVm, 071 4•193D am ap85c0b1a fico" aro State mad=am ba.w arta
FULL FLOTATION CU7TIN(l UNITS
(ffIDE DISEHAFiGCM00TE77
OUARDIANe 72' RECVCLCAr', FINE CUT FLAIL 2760,
72' REAR DISCHARGE, MODEL 10710 MODEL 20716 MODEL 44590
72 1103 cm) -0 of W. Ihmt blade hart 7r 1103 an) v m" a CW e.p dpi few W 1152 cm) wxh of cul. I" kry , ,wh%
TV W n r•.:un,paMaoe
lw ,pay G.0 ronnmpe —,coo ,elan Rocycwg capwa4 caw m a 7]00 rpm trod ,~ Ira Rea
.e.DwcD.cly 0-p" nn(ar0.
MOWNG RATS IAOwa w to 30 ac—?v Il 5hac-t:o, hrI W S 5 mph IS 0~w) MCwap rate* ocwow m Mea up to 21 aaata 1125 h"i"bla
ccalarm 51 not (a 9 km71r) Lwwwp Lab m
omemra a vtt.A71e
L�aoq wit � kG.0O Cn.'G. w+1ul rkX. �K
DISTRIBUTING CO.
Tuesday, May U2, 1995
Raper Mads
mol cello city of
PO Box1147
Ma tmelb, Mn 55382
Dear Roger.
We are pleased to quote prices an the following equipment.
OTY�� J�r��T DESCRIPTION QUOTE
1 G with 72 in side dW&wpe deckdtx seat
ROPS with
canopy 511,584.00
Note Add 8.5% State Sales Tax
Equipmerd would be set up, serviced. and delivered covered under standard
manufaehrres warranty
If you have any questions please call me at 812.475-2200 Ext 228
Sinom ty. n
Don Mereehman
Commercial Sales
14900 Twemy-first Avenue North • PlyrtlaRh. Minnesota 55447.4855 • Phone (812) 475.2200 • Fax (81 2) 47 S1
8�
min
WOND
Groundsm2tter M -D
2. It heel Dyke with 0'
Side Discharge Deck Groundsmaster M -D
4411 heel Drire
with Guardian v 62 "R.rycfcr M
Power of Choice
14 owerful Grounds er
teatures a r w e _3J
.,'.
�yfinuer �iuuotsnt we a engine.
The Groundsmaster 324 with its
24 hp Mitsubishi gas engine pro-
vides you with the durability diesels
are kr mown for, but with more
power. Both give you all the speed
id power needed for the most
oenanding jubs.
Operator Comfort
Groundsmaster 300 Series
tractors combine convenient
control features with an incredibly
comfortable operator station to
positively influence a tireless,
productive operator performance.
A high back seat with optional
armrests and deluxe suspension
ensures a smooth ride all day long.
The mid -mount radiator draws air
intake behind the operator serving
to keep his or her environment
cooler.
Easy to see instrumentation. easy
to reach controls and a relaxed
single pedal operation of forward
d reverse speeds contribute to
oigh productivity.
Special standard features of these
liquid cooled performers include a
high temperature shut down
protection system, a low oil engine
light and buzzer, a heavy-duty
remote mounted air cleaner and a
mid -mount industrial radiator—
for the durability and long lived
performance Gmundsmasters are
known for.
Groundsmasfer M4
with 52' Side Discharge Deck
Standard 23" tires provide a fast
transport speed, a smooth ride.
better curb climbing and more
traction -assist with accessory use.
Super wide tires with 10.5" tread
are optionally available for even
more flotation and side hill
stability.
Groundsmaster® 200 Series Specifications*
�GROUNDSMIISTER 223-0 PRM1E MOVER — DMU-0
OROUM)WAADTER i"1;61! MOVER — OMSEL
a WHEEL ORNE. MODEL 3=0
MuWtsm MOM L3E-61TO, 3 cAnder, ran. A cycle,
kprd=0Wyea,en¢w 23ro(172kVy):gWv Wm■
mumu. SPna a 7200 sVn. 50 09 m n (932 ul
I hPec.m.re. Famed k&cabn ay gm Pr1m.
ANaierbW Cmm0u9w 1xrerrlar. 12,0e (1 a kW h e"mcm
E7GNE (Irrsemnty") luta POM dh 140LALl" Nter.
R.PaCeabr w me h.enr wpere9or .m17 male
UWW. 12vn(1.61.W1 War-. Wavy ady remota
..reed er dear-. SMa1 ad KOer. Ho WM
nnOdewre $W -dc rn Mt M. (Opcnoc Spark Arrumr
fiM . PIN rA=. )
GRDUNDSMASTER 224 PRWE MOVER—GM
MODEL 3O72a
L1u-b1 . 3 CY•near. A Lyda, Aao1 omm. vOtw a—mm
vaM. ges* w -w* em1 Cam bjgw esMr Piro. 24 to it
kM; DPwneo to • maAAlllrrl AppAs al I= rpm. 49.3 m n.
190E W motamr-a FPtao k&cxw Or gm pxnp
k molal alemmWgMpowror, l2vow.skmoscn
(Vww. rt j toll WIM wm1 nPacube rerw IaLM_ 12,012
(11 kw) genet. MU" aM —M mareed W daark-
Swn ad ta.r Tu.M w elallbn.ypa wo t.rnp.has
M -Cl newiYh. (OpbW t Speak ArWW Savem PM
rs-e 01
FUEL CAPACM , 6 S 9•1b, (322 ku). IMM f". 1 DS palm 1322 W. uYrded µMr
GAUGES A OGPIE Itw mem. hrM µuge. mwnpwaaR. pope. A p I MPO r *. tYN µuDe. 4rtprreve PP. 3 42 •ammo
PROTECTION da W gauge ae wasa m w.- IanOr.nrr. lege aro dlucer OWP: 00 preaMaa. wM Ma9eearr0 aro WIW3 Hgh
SYSTEMS pbr MQ Hvp1 er IWrua..a M -don wWH t.mPerAtun W.A4W-
RAOMTOR ; Aea.n, me rrusmnl nLt= r Cdufittamk 7 aro Pw m . APa 6 aan 13.7 a.n Capecty. Renate elolrm I WM IAS
Wen e>mW w,k.
HV&M nc Uq" tmrlarmPn wen a'De peau Cana CO b.v.alren.ea Tana local 23 maon.eCauaon tam. Ah
acne n rourkor.or ^y*CM C aMrl116fbn: WW cane W pP 12••rv10 aro q v.Ma. ApPp. Io.rAon aApoCal A
'11RACTON DRIVE *AM is 7 neral. MPOM 10243. RW ad. a tnea wetly Pen from Ala Axis W a —W amt An un•dnrrld
mwlnrq OAM 0rovwM rear an Ku" n Iwro ea ttlNo= ft -V rpOA. Wrr a n 2+ "Orme mode. Am. 1.9
DOA 0 a Wan pW 1kAaWd Capecdy.
GROUND SPEED 6,OmP1 I,a,kmm.). r'6W.M wrrae.
CLEARANCE Fen Taus 0 Wnr e0 1'(152 con). Mehl 30243' .ear 9mum aocimce 014 3' 11 tan:.
MAINFRAME AO.abep brmp.tod
MESIVYNE[lDl T.P "m tram- a.— a.. — 23 . 6 6.12..1 oarouenaA —A.
PRE6fURD T.O roar W.eeV arca. ItleOeta 30723g072A —,E . e sal. MaON 3@O —, E . 6,SOd AO PrM An koelaa aro Ay/l two.
Re[Prvn.roiq cop omen.: 20 OP I,>s kPa) Oa1am Wme Tre w/Rm 2] . 10 3.12 Pen W 62.1020.
BRAKED
kbvdlml r 1 1 73 (� 7 e Cm . A A On) Pre type wMM tlr.ka AIW 01n•q orate an.We Ir.CPn MV.Ie Dy.lstic OreY/p
PrPgn vaaan amro.
STEERM
1ryaalec po+M ma—M 13' (3] —1 W. -V weed
I1APLEYENT ORN!
1'12 S an) a ngW costa PTO he O V.0 try a 1 Mw"ln.0 11A' e0aan V -b a PTO AVaW by .%wc
CSm bm. Cavloetxn b rraNm.n w en A Okw.1a pre arm toNkmwV WW aavrnbtl
— _
LMPLEMENTUPT
T.n nyor•1GC rykrbontosrme kn .ma ---_
CONTROLS
Foolvoo m Damon as Oroko P.hn MAlv-0PWWw promo, CMC*$ PTO Gwen a W1 . PW W. -0~ bet low.
MODEL 3096"
W10 pnaon s.m1 IM10een ]0227 0!543 naw P. 049 PAech aro. ants)
ELECTWAL
12 vn n1nr1NnW1aP Trp Partm • 630 cola Cramog mm W o' P (•1a' C). 43 l -who ntaww CWxay M N' F 127' Cl
FEATURED
40 anb a wl m -m I C mg-mtnreah.r Seal -vm. PTO .ro tr! ntwwm arWl'ho Eery ao:eaa Am Palkal
ROUND LEVEL
900DIA) W aWWW o ea. anon -z, epaplmp WWa , .m vary 000y daDnaeq w 010 Due
CERTtFtCARON
Gamed.. ;;;Mo Amrn'an Na.aWSW;;WmlrClOo.(AWTOPp.aa.ona. 071 C 1900AM ap'=N Feonkl AN
3-.. e.N .0wew nary
31ae .elpaaana tYLxO hrOP1.
WARRANTY Tw y.Y WOO warm" Rote, to w'W—W me O.arGlrne.te --w 6— Op.remr. mw%o w k - htW.
FULL FLOTATION CUrW4 UNRD
Ir SIDS OMCNA114011
W' RISA OOIDC�NAROD
I 6r DIW DIOCNAROD
rr WO OMCNAR09
WD
MODEL 3096"
1 YOgEL 705N
IgOEL 2DE7D
, MODEL 3mm
67 1132 mlcm al as
67 1157 m). am a OA,
rr f+nani•ty d OA.
ar 1167 anl.ml al all.
TTM 3040. Iron rrblruod
3-Oboe,.PV . %x~
3-.. e.N .0wew nary
Sm, has moueta0atary
l
MLyy
nA1.1'
R.LKyan0a6Y.ty rM1ro
Mwmwgt acrooalr
'I{' Aao.awb]A �CraN1r
MownbpA040=Awlla
Md.e1pm3e&mft1rni
MOWTNO RATS^ I l , tl.curpaM at rJ a mon
. MLm.Oa'Ivl W 66 mW
McxaeMM M 6 6 myl p 0
lww &%) W 6 0 mon II O
t 116 krrMq _
111
10 0 knNq . _ _ _—
' ODP aACm Inrr1 aut'LO d
r
0.e, abut hon a0W d
De[e dW trmn adP10e of
Oa oboe, b re low [.r.pl•
.eaM m I.n arh.roo
card t] rn Inn ado Ir
Meda rR mm Ph. tr
In r ism) Deck an erml
TRIIWASAJTV 10 25' am7.
I41 ml UKut COCA M.
(b Ce L%om V"ML 14'
1 Rm 0,05a a cm =m we
e nz U
III.MI Wad CeM
(311 CIN M1cwCro. we
I ma.n u0.—WI. I7(13an)
Unca .1.1 u d nal."
wdn WS Of n WINO M1pd
Ire a.Owd" .heal
UncaPwa vW. zr IR C"
~bake r
hrMN r
bae. r
I U.101 t10e«m V:_0 d moo
"—U om tet an to 0.0q.
L
'lbarxun M awp Iraa PtrleP.eur.orc. rA O
•+.a..a.rr. AmMieCnOCb1. oy
Groundsmaster 200 Series Specifications* (continued)
FULL FLOTATION CUTMNG UNITS
37' SIDE OISCNARGS
1�OF130.S35 OUAROIAIP 62•
5r REAR DISCHARGE er S106 DISCHARGE 77 N>SC/1/1ROE MCYCLEAE
YODEL am MODEL 30564 YODEL 30373 YODEL 30360
Aalustabis n .5• (+3 mm) naenWw by npmWMkt9 raerb Dee naldt9lM Gaol . t.5' m 4S (3A m t 1.4 an)
nrs08e1d loom CJrtIM hams TOW Ma Gfkf7. 100 Of cut range: 1'10 4(L5 To 10 1 en). � aG)WeW trW ally nW n s
MOM 3056111 ordr. HOC ripe of r to 33• (7.5 Cm to 6.0 an). 03 mm) noertrnb wh
HEIGHT OF CUT apaOls Wdr raw alrlb,
t.s (3 a an) 11800 of as nol
m uMa saws
aa:rq
Conditions.
Model 30333: 12 gaups 12 gas bmwd aha waded wel cwmmxgon wM 7 gauge 17 gage tow r (10 an)
l onned stem tonmuglon wlaad eOOan braakala. 5 (12.7 nun) OW Wn6TunlMe am.+MOeO coMfii9ul
am nteg snlcvesl rloa. housi Q rgtloigO wM 12 gauge
7 gape wabea rgpon amnneb and 10 gauge pWp.
EnCmm 5.112.7 an) OM
COIDTRUC710N Wn6TWWM*hasap.
No" 30330: 12 Tim
lamed aro welop
aermwool w1d1 7 gape
welded 111400M braaam. T
(7A an) dow
PTO Shsll emM1, aalabon tnae0ad gplOw Wm1 riGn wipe a" b" Sesta. GeBom laOHbn nrurm PTO won
PMy dMp a woo •AA• section bad in 3 Wlra wdawmlaro a0 a rubber lam er gaubm we 1.26:1 qww
aim and -staid Stam killer plsey wail a"" MOW Teel and branip. Each I' (" an) Davin gem. SWISH •M•
diameter blade ayes slid 03 erlaladea In • rloniraa7 SOPMW call can 7lo1W^g with seam IIs bad to spsea.
lagrW toe, 0 ...P pease .Stam 00 lop. Oma P1sN spwHd to epalde Brat 0ta0a Stam ear PMI's. V (2.5 on)
CUTTER DRIVE adapeM wabea TO spulaa mrd. Mawr baft bataa to etYPa and ayes. Orin" spkloH shaft luta on
Iw grweabH HOeraa mar
doming+ (Wuseslya bdm lap
of cool A Paan" spa ad
OW"Cl oil atmare PA&P to
sows shaft To, ragh IOrdlr
caosm
T,vm lr (46 coni %t T)m 215'(55 =) Will. Thae 21.75163 =1 lore TNM 21.73' (55 an) bhp.
SLAVES 2.r (6.3 ant wIN. M: 2.5163 Om) rifle. H: 2.5(8.3m) wads. s4• le _i era. nevoawed
15 mm) lira, hasl•bpmd 15 —) disk. halo naeW (5 —) lick, hasm4 rated at",. Gu~ Re clem
Sten blade, meal blades. ares aedw blacks
Mover Oe" m apwoW n pemrpd cane trams. Hatsllt a ma Mocks Ow r aha Mamie Dee norm a.=w ftd by
. CARRIERcarter Trani annarcw Cu" unit Notation and stand Whass, m00bwy 14) a 120 Cmc ser wow
FRAYS Optwrd Its spO-wan www
WSPEKSION bam-9 Rea c=m Haus
PalerOee mawM1 olawn,
Pnou n oc, 5 (20,3 an) Oa Ratak. r (7 6 ant woo. bun tread tura mounted an P (10 2 Stn) Tie has aro toter GLUM mm.
CASTER WHEELS wlrols .m+spewaeEle miles baku and hoM duty aWlpa tOW on a rapleeawH 6• a 3 5 (2O l e 0 an) mala
speniter, 100" PhOMM Caster Whisk Aaaemay. PM 27.1050: two mime.) of rota rubow and
sgrawwm -11- baeny,
fir RD 57 SO er SD 77 SD Am kc%p ao located on pal
Tao: man raWa r v v v �a ThMe ana�b Hama
AYTFSCALP Tad rear r>re0w a0. IaIWk v r r Amumm Blom
FEATURES LMA s aaWmw niers v v
Rlyd ep lrarWm MM v
TM OM. deck ako Pans v r
Glade wm-ww alai r v r v
Duck.
type uM+M; to bola repwW. Ouowwm. ho wow
DOCK COVERS Pbsaa won NO slab
ta?aea I b m .
Hen cloaks W alar Ma ma0'tng Pblemn ke West waabdaloGl a nlpwar Cams winmo ipni W lime and
WT ARMS deme a ataor adWadww hyaaulb wrp0 bwelw
Ormoe deck solloan.
t#Eaff 200m.101W) 255@a.(12gkit) 3C01a.(1WW) 340 op 1161 W)
COUNTERSALANCS Mocha 3071»072" MOI. Yodel" 3GlSSaam airy: Yodels 30323D0}2s tarry: Yodels 30>�134 any.
WEIGHT' m m. is kg) a ma es m. (25 kg) a nes oo be. ell Ygl eve ataa0r 70 b t77 kW a raw mrar
murtawga mesad meow "MOM reamed wq0 maarad. w000 morwf
CIRTIFJCATION Cwl lo roam ala AlrWlfin NabW SmwaN Mamas's IA7Ci0 apaCOmbare. 071,41000 wo ap0ao0H Fadry w1p
Stam lags a based 0Wa0n
'Crsowsarw aro kik wser.aa+a moaxed r O+tO.eaa is ides 1
'Darla nick ml..t wn ww1 ideas W weep 3013 kali 3d>7e w 041 D w.r.Na
SCH"BER & SONS
P0. BOX In
137M WUN STREET
WOERS. MN 55774
March 27. 1996
Roger Madc
cuy of Moatiallo
230 E Broadway
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 33362
Enclosed plmse Sad some very specifie uhnna= an the John Dene F923 and F935 ftom mowers_ I
am proposing both of than machines beomse they are identical other than the items on page 210.7 drat
state that the F935 has a (2) 5.3 gal Gael tants, where the F925 has but woe, and the F933 has a weight
aw kr control valve far limited slip an_ nuns and a cruise control where the F925 don not. The aft
syedficatiom are enclosed the get into the details of both machine.
t The pricing of the t%vo units aro as follows:
John Deere F925 From mower with all standard options Usted, and 23 X 10.30-12 drive Ores, 72" side
discharge mower. and 4 post BOPS:
$10747.66
JohnF935 F mower with all sundard options UshA and 23 X 10.50- 12 drive tires. 72* side
dlselwge 4 post BOPS:
(11287.20
If there aro any f mother qucg= please call. 1 %MW be glad to go lhroagh soy with you. 7bank You.
Sincerely,
Mika rttaelk
Scharber R Son<�
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
2WD COMMERCUL FRONT MOWER
22 H.P. Vanmar 516 ea in. liquid cooed diad engine
High enerp 91- Plots
Hea" deny drelnner
Engine ou UUer
12 Volt deetrie start
40 Amp automotive altcroator
11 Gallon Ord capacity
Two pedal hydroantie foot control
DUferendal dodo
Cruise control
Hydrostatic front wbed drive
Hydrostatic power steam¢
23-10.30-12 turf drhe ttra
1&&S" ribbed steering dra
Transminbn oU coder
Steering asstrt broker
Marten brake
Dual hydraulic tmpement UR cylinders
24pod Hydraulic Control
Hoormeter
Storage compartment
Electric P.T.O. Implement drive
P.T.O. shaft drive
Operator presence system
Fod page
Low oU pressure warning, light and born
cm Iran rear hamper with studs for add' e¢ rear wdgbt
Wdgbt transfer valve
PrMe sslmd seat
Two pat Roll -Gard ROPE sad seri bolt
Tod hos
Optional Equipment:
72" Side discharge mover. 0.156 constructlon, with goo p wheeb, and and4calp rollers, blades to be
.712 thick
60" Side discharge mower. 0.176 construction, with gangs wbeds, and and scrip rdlera, blade to be
.712 thick
60" Rear discharge mower. 0.176 eomduetldn. wUb pop wbeds, and and scalp rollers, blades to
be .712 thick
Q 8R
r" ALF
COMMERCIAL FRONT MO HERS
•Pi`s � � t :a��'',� _
♦ � .. w :yam :W � 1 _ �,M7i::.-.._.. ..
.. �•'r�r.::y-VK!7R^:itin�+••%ia`liArGtV _ .. .+ + ,. 1J4�.
IL
T,ake An Entire Committee
C,
,9
1 TM 78LSah nardbchSW mous, (oft") hM srept-sAftsaft
�; dM1pt kw v 4. It Nb the "23. F933.tt0 F93A
I •Yi The 8oanch moasl nM , uMqus DaffRrt(
• F^ � �' i • � epetem hn wperh
—\� . ■\ `✓ • `►-� � CdPPInp Qlsperaal.
\ •� '�. It Nb all F900 . -o•.
� � 1 ,.t.• _ S Serbs all - ..
F114&a TM 3Mneb hao bta ft M
ell
hTdmdks0y an5w 10 dsVtn
'� • : '-� ISN Cr ropn. Adjustabh skW Shows.
4 rSyoetaWt Cuttbl/ awe. Rb
F900 butts and F1143.
s whM .6 to Straus. be reaq choose Me WM•®
Rat 4&kch snow Qao.er at daft. Or Me _
bt/eapacfq 47•k 24taa Sno.bw.
(bsk.) MR bulla wKw up to 19 bwt. _ •
y Sfro. ff o Rb F700 ' • 14a MEW"
Sots . Sno.bbwer --® caawtlon STabm
� NabfSa bwadlfprt kit sots
ktatarM
(a"" an F700 Saba) pasfdwa Nb F"O Swing and
&MMMd W&Wt)' ~ darh. Fuad K to bushet CaptCNy.
P� VaMW.pWd
Prerhtd. FIB ap hoot moven.
tr
1 Tde7eMrsmufchky aftanM
mwR mtMeMw DMS Ssd k)awa.
kWhxW b4WM defbotm
ramp end dbehtrgo ckw we. Rb
an leant mores.
IN
■ /Mt opM tM door has
oo&MW'S SSR to dwrp Clygk(p
No I"M. OW 94LMa Cstn "
wa.0 aanamEry aptfonal. nb
F700 Sattt.
3•hA MOW. Ns -y° ft Y
bto.ec Rb FM strips No
F314B wtM 304no dWk.
i RMW 80•.4h h a QUMY eta. Comes dMw
stalls VMS fro, Cub R ON all dbpaaM It wuMIJ, C-OWM Ma a hftft aOOMmM from
11/2 b a MWIP" *Mt Onaaabb SWMW". aCCMSIdS ban O. No of Of dirk make Savice
.wk mors uk* to `
aeo F11SD. V
r
i�
�S
C15-210.6
F900 Series Front Mowers
MOWER DECKS
SPECIFICATIONS
(Specifications and design subject to change without norice)
A
!�
mho
Front Mower CompatibOlty:
F911 ..................
Standard
Optional
Optional
Not available
F925 ..................
Standard
Optional
Optional
Optional
F932 ..................
Optional
Standard
Optional
Optional
F935 .............:....
Optional
Standard
Optional
Optional
Cutting Width .............
60-in.(1524 mm)
72.8-in.0840 mm)
60 -in. (1524 mm)
76 -in. (1930 mm)
Overall Width .............
72.5-in.(1842mm)
85-in.(2159min)
65.2-in.0650 man)
783-in.(1994am)
Blades:
Number ...............
3
3
3
3
Blade material ..........
Heat treated, high alloy steel
Blade length ............
20.5 in. (520 mm)
C 15 -in. (635 mm)
203 -in. (520 mm)
25.93 -in. (684 mm)
Blade width ............
2.5 -in. (633 mm)
2.5 -in. (63.5 mm)
23 -in. (63.5 mm)
2.5 -in. (63.5 mm)
Blade thickness..........
0312 -in. (7.92 mm)
0.312 -in. (7.92 mm)
0.312 -in. (7.92 mm)
0.204 -in. (5.18 mm)
Blade drive .............
Double angle belt
Double angle belt
HB section belt
Friction disk
(hat section)
(hex section)
Mower drive ...........
Gearbox, spiral gears
Gearbox. spiral gears
Cost iron gearbox
Cast iron gearbox
(beveledgears)
(beveled gears)
Spindles ...............
1 -in. (25.4 mm)
[-in. (25.4 mm)
[-in. (25.4 mm)
I -in. (25.4 mm)
Bearings ...............
Greastable (through
Greaswble (through
Greaseable (through
Tapered roller,
spindles)
spindles)
spindles)
greaseable
Blade 77p Speed
(feet per minute)
Minimum (3450 engine rpm) 14.693
14,713
14,700
14,414
Maximum (3600 engine
rpm) ...
15,332
15.352
15.300
15.573
Coster wheels:.............
Size ..................
I Ix4.00.5 in., 4
PR (279 x 102 mm)
Type ..................
Pneumatic
Front Anti -Scalp Roger .....
9.75 x 4 in. Sul.
9.75 x 4 in. Std.
9.75 x 4 in. Optional
9.73 x 4 in. Std.
Two Rear Anti Seatp Rollers . 9.75 x 4 inch
9.75 x 4 inch
N.A.
N.A.
Cutting bright .............
1.5 to 4.5 in.
1.5 in 4.5 in.
I to 6 in.
1 to 5.1/2 in.
(38 to 114 mm)
138 to 114 mm)
(25 to 152 mm)
(25 to 140 mm)
Deck offset ................
14.4 in. (366 mm)
18 in. (457 mm)
14.3 in. (364 mm)
18 art. (457 inn)
Uncut Circle of Gran
(withom using brake) .....
34 in. (864 mm)
30 in. (762 mm)
41 in. (1041 mm)
14 in. (356 mm)
Deck 1111 height
Front .................
14 to 16 in.
14 to 16 in.
8.4 to 10.4 in.
12.0 in.
(305 mm)
(355 x406 mm)
(355 to406 mm)
(213 to 266 mm)
Rear ..................
6.5 to 8.5 in.
6.5 to 8.5 in.
5 to 7 in.
4.75 in.
(121 mm)
(165 to 216 mm)
(165 to 216 mm)
(127 to 178 mm)
Discharge .................
Hinged, right
Hinged, right
Rear
Rear
Deck construction ..........
One kce stamped steel
Deck thickness ............
0.134 in. (3.40 mm)
0.156 in. (3.96 mm)
0.134 in. (3.40 mm)
0.120 in. (3.0 min)
Weight, opprox.............
330 lb. (160 kg)
440 lb. (200 kg)
330 lb. (145 kg)
515 Ib. (232 kg)
Acres per hour* ...........
23 at 5 mph
3 at 5 mph
23 at 5 mph
3.8 at 5 mph
(4.0 at 8.1 km/h)
(4.8 at 8.1 km/h)
(4.0 as 8.1 km/h)
(6.1 at 8.1 km1h)
• 77re acres per hour is an estimated figura The results
were figured allowing for a 10 percent time fav for mower width over -
lop, 5 percent time foss for turns, trimming, etc and mowing a smooth area.
it
J�
UP a.c tseretau,oJL
i8u
a
s� Mountains Into Mow Hills
*:_ 0
Full • f92.4 F!47- i 1. *
=140 g05 22 -hp dutrl PN•4p ra J1.4p daw I v 1 I
'Sboc� aU4 rp1n 1 J-Dw Vf)^ ad -,,p v
B
f you've got the wrong equipment, even mow-
ing the flats can be an uphill battle. That s why
■ re.I(.raWdu+m
FM» rerol
more and more cutters are climbing up on the F1145.
flew" Vtwb duip AV
With its new 28 -hp high-torque diesel• this machine is
1110MCo°PIN& RM VM
how P foray
undisputed king of the hills.
.0a1.,,a1 Ando
With the F1145• you can set the 4 -wheel drive "full
&i°°iip°'n" d'
o0 @Lr b
time" for continuous mowing. Or you can let it engage
and disengage automatically, according to changes in
out""(bona"P=W- '
met60'
terrain and conditions.
V= J '
PS d me .
What makes the F1145 so durable?
•'L
.s
First, tractor -tough componentry. With the F1145s
transmission, differential, 2 -speed axle, and planetary
final drives lifted straight from our best-selling 855
P'
Compact Utility Tractor. And individual wet -disk brakes
that allow constant sidehill feathering with almost no
r�
wear or adjustment.
There's also power steering and a 22 -inch turning
o
radius. Plus an exlusive hydraulic 170 clutch with
modulated engagement that reduces parts wear.
T w"• ,
Read more about the F1145 and o 2 -wheel -drive
0®Series n pages 6 through 9. Then see your
dear an on-site demonstration.
*:_ 0
Full • f92.4 F!47- i 1. *
=140 g05 22 -hp dutrl PN•4p ra J1.4p daw I v 1 I
'Sboc� aU4 rp1n 1 J-Dw Vf)^ ad -,,p v
B
C
A
T I
O
N
S
Feu -SEM FROW mous
7
Erglm
Nll
F92S
FM
FM
fill
Tyro
Fsmb gn
ya Need
vsms pu
Trrra no
!V=t"
ndsma.ro ..
.. 22(Is 1w). ..
.. 22(16k"
290akw) ..
.af,swt
I3(29e hon
No CO CAMm .
2 ... -
3 .
3
traumna*."
H=m .....
HOMM
wamral
WILmaL .
.7a=
Same7Cwl....
..
..
.
I ....
Bao
.299n its mW ...
. 2.BIm V2 raa)
Ielm(a. W)
231 in (72 rtan)
3070 VO-)
Stmu
25sm(Sammp ....
2.84 E72 ma) ..
254. (72—)
.254-M—)
330.IM m6
D=WAme'u
37)m.n(BITmn ..
... .. S36 m a fm an)
.5360 a 16/9m17
S35ma(679 mm)
578Ms(1113cn1
SWWV 4m
12+6e .. ....
12.0 .
12-4a12-40
'2-,V
LUWM,jn
Fmulia IQmm6 ..
... FOrae16 MtSRN 6
Finakm O>es"Mm
Fala4et Oremomt
'vto4m]. a'dVml
.ft IN blow
mrAO n1. ead
.tj Ib.6La
MA ft. UM
+Ad ft. a
cowm
L41 ... ......
... L -OV ..... .
Lasa...
Lbum .
:aN
An had ZrA
NmIF416F7. dl
..
Ka"44. aY.
M"44 ary.
'ebY•61N. ft
Iaa2Carei WCFLrude
Dtea6v RDer 07
awim Dow dw'm
amC1 Lm FM LT1
:'Ma =0 mm
W Lad
FW ea., m p:a= ..
F.0 ft. ray
F m M. 1e0aauy
FAL Ca ImLxc!n
=_I rye
EIST11ca eR>'
Cum %T"
A1edoL WIV
AIMnM4Fro
+WI
AutOnmNlFpl
:Wwmm qym
29rrtm&allllea
4011M IYaym
*NM&VNV
q.arla FaRltd
.1 -am an=
On�IWa
Tlae
mpm V 57
H V tiro
V 1Fro
thcr= V IFro
-r C'C>Z.0 V tme
•!a tI12hQma L7
a01 ry-IC1Ca1a h$
I h'91-0r1DLt Lir
wm r4't=I Ltv
•. ^.1141-121 Lala
TrlW C 4 �0121
Fonar)
0-196rrmpn
0",ron
±-OerRn
0.706mo6
:I �'r 177 bmr1•a41
ill"ut)
1,7:^,•01
117 k"
:d I'3 lel aatWn
•dac7
0-53m
o-sl.n
:-53To
M3m
:-53 m, (61 UM4+�
1e5r'*1
cesv 1
53.r-,1
msknA
-:2 -,retvr .
Olkrt ' 1 CC+
SW=
SI3rs1
5 V=
6hr=
i i l
Truer Lt :, w m:! r
Ra&m Uro
Raarn qm
FLt.rTrl ryW
04= 10
'u Ca "De
FM
Tr°
De= xae
EYcr,maa
Eera=cv
Eka,cmzm
sax 2v
:1•A
SRA Ngo C_l
sr=✓aa w:m
$113a.,1a=*
9aI e. tvs
:-dl L'u" Mmn
1r,aa
TIDI
()hall, IICa1CM
Q!{{an tl'RJ[M
�'Jn �4M
6naa, arnre.e
.:el SL
Sal
7e II71mm1
7 m Iltlmm)
7 , 071"1
Lw flilemr
Los.:
F1de W.4 Meet
FrmaaMMmb
Plam.MW
FTIad ooa3
: ^a4 Ok7I
and"
TpI
FNM. MOM=
POW 7aosrx.
F:- mc==
Mel N===
+-+e %==
IW bIYmLyrylCai
Iilab2Hhlm *4KI
Wlbdaa
IW to Tom ko*'a
'131la w—*40
OW, W, "MOM C.002.0161r lgaliCJ41(
2-L1e�MmOl$x
;7{muOt32%M
NVCUC
2IT"MSW=
: aI..7^
bq m1GW
t= cm
:1 mlaa
=C=
';a •. c.
W.:o 7—:1
L3Y.+aa
&-v=
Sam=
Er'mc-1
Taus ansu
31 USO (19u..m Lm
36uS 0 UILIW.rLim
31 usaf29IJ-;W—,
:I US0(390-92=1
F.mLai xcr
ssusaefalu
5 UI"1meu
lusyllleu
ouswlaeu
ous¢y1a6u
6dOr A:��C:2
AM (P(a Iu
46U3a FLU
/5us0 RIL)
16Usa IaaU
+e USC(Am
1�'=L�'l l':.T.a lLbalTia
�Cn SJI
It.
D
CIT/ OF MONTICELLO MONTHLY BUILDING DEPARTMENT REPORT
MONTH OF APRIL 1995
PERU" a USES
'T!" -Sema
MomnLast Yew T1es Yeo:
PE,f1►Jf TS E§ ED
MogIJ,And Lal Your To
Oa» To Den
RESIDENTIAL
• Number
25
22
47
54
vakmdw
$680.400.00
SM.S0040 $1,596300.00 $1.879.700.00
Fees
$7.704.47
$075.70
$11.08795
$20.985.46
SurUnrm
$277.20
$295.90
$7%15
$938.07
COMMERCIAL
Number
5
7
13
12
veAsmon
9776200.00
$196.300.00
$487.30DAD
$M=JDD
Fen
$6.076.02
$2,44520
84,837.37
67,285.02
Surdnrpn
9768.10
$107.86
$24265
$495.95
INDUSTRIAL
Number
0
3
6
1
Velu9tlbn
$040
$1.038,600.00 $1.07490040
$675.000.00
Fees
$0.00
$6.732.51
67,30748
97,736.43
SwTt- a
$040
S518M
$537.45
Llai o
PLUMSM
N fltw
9
12
27
27
Fna
5494.00
9710.00
8679.00
$1.33740
SurUnrpes
8450
$840
$13.50
$13.80
MECNAWAL
Number
9
NO
w
26
Fen
$402.00
$1,063.00
Sunlupe
$4.50
$1340
Dow
OTHERS
Nxnber
0
2
3
2
Valus"an
i0A0
$040
$040
Fen
SurrSl w
$040
$0.00
62.000.00
$140
930.00
$1.80
$200.00
60.00
ffi6L 03
TDTAL VAl UADON
9
81.33SA0000
0
$1.83e.400A0
97.077.500.00
122
X1.393 �^^^^
I9I6L F€€9
914.676 49
913.091.42.
$23 722.1 a
974.74890
TOTAL SUNiCHAROES.
$674.30
SAM
81353.25,
III.ON92
CURRENT MONM
FEES
I
eFRM1T Ne1jURE
P.MI'!:''
Big"
V"qp
Tea Yep
I"Ylp
SWO Famll7
6
SILM37
5240.76
N8. AW.00
20
2D
Duplex
0
D
Cone lordal
1
$1,921.49
$125.00
$250.00040
2
0
wdwg l
0
1
0
PAS, Gwpn
0
0
S"
0
0
Putoc euw
1
92.694,12
8191.00
63631800.00
1
0
ALTERATIONIREPAIR
Dmeemrpe
14
6709.10
1279E
669.400.00
20
24
Commercial
3
61.459,47
$71.20
6142.&WjW
9
13
Irx3Mb4I
0
e
PLUMBING
A9 T7pn
9
6494.00
14AD
67
27
MECHAMCIIL
0
A9 rMas
9
$40200
6430
Its
M
ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES
swft p POole
0
0
DoCko
6
67540
$2.50
17,600.00
5
1
MOVING PEAWT
9
0
TEMPORARY PERWT
0
0
DFMQP
M
%1 ?d 49
9674.30
91.3]6.010040
1n 96