Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 05-22-1995AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CM COUNCIL Monday, May 22.1995 - 7 p n. Mayor- Brad Fyle Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault 1. Call to order. 2. Consideration of approving minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1995, and the special joint meeting held May 15, 1995. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. A Consideration of appointing new HRA member. B. Consideration of purchasing 1 -ton bucket truck. C. Consideration of a resolution approving the issuance of a gambling license to MLBA Children's Fund - Joyner Lanes. D. Consideration of approving sale of tax -forfeited land parcels by the County Auditor. R Consideration of a resolution calling for a public hearing regarding a modified housing program and issuance of revenue bonds for the ( Mississippi Shores Senior Housing Project. a. Citizens commentatpetitions, requests, and complaints. 5. Consideration of an update from the City Assessor an properties that were re-evaluated after the Board of Review -,Jerry Kramber. 8. Consideration of approval of the preliminary plat of the Pinehurst residential subdivision. Applicant, Gene Bauer. 7. Consideration of approval of a conditional use permit which would allow two 3 -unit townhomes in an &2 district. Applicant, Gene Bauer. 8. Consideration of a resolution accepting bids and awarding the sale of 13,890,000 G.O. improvement bonds, Series 1995A. 9. Consideration of approving contract with Buchen Environmental - I A I Study. 10. Consideration of a request for additional time to complete driveway and parking lot hard surfacing • Ams: Storage, Glen FNsusta. Agenda City Council May 22, 1995 Page 2 11. Consideration of adopting policies governing granting of final occupancy permits prior to full completion of site improvements. 12. Consideration of a resolution approving plans and specifications for construction of School Boulevard between Fallon Avenue and Highway 25. 13. Consideration of authorizing the City Engineer to prepare a feasibility study on improvements to the Highway 25/Oakwood Drive road system. 14. Consideration of authorizing the City Engineer to prepare a feasibility study on ramp and bridge improvements at County Road 118 and I-94. 15. Consideration of reviewing bids for contracted mowing services. 18. Consideration of purchasing parks department mower. 17. Consideration of bills for the month of May. 18. Adjournment. MINUTES SPECIAL JOINT NP -MING - MONTICELLO COM U38IONS Monday, May 15.1995 - 7 pin Members Presen : City Council: Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault Plenniug Commission: Dick Frie, Jon Bogart, Dick Martie, Richard Carlson, Rod Dragsten HRA: Al Larson, Tom St. Hilaire, Everette Ellison, Brad Barger Parks Commission: Bruce Thielen, Fran Fair, Larry Nolan, Steve Andrews, Roger Carlson Members Absent: Shirley Anderson, City Council Others Present: Sheldon Johnson, School District; John McVay, IDC; Ken Maus, IDC; Ron Hoglund, Chamber of Commerce; Bret Weise, City Engineer A special joint meeting of Monticello Commissions was held for the purpose of identifying goals and objectives for the city in the area of housing and economic development and to discuss a variety of strategies for accomplishing those goals. Direction provided from the meeting will become the basis for major sections of the comprehensive plan. Once goals have been established, the City will then review the ordinances, decide if they accomplish the goals that have been set, and make any changes aeeurdingly. 9. City Planner Steve Grittman reviewed and the group discussed potential economic development goal statements with the following results: What is the primary purpose for the City's economic development program? A. Monticello should pursue economic 16 development to broaden the City's tax base. B. Monticello should pursue economic development for the purpose of expanding the Citys job inventory. Page 1 9 Special Joint Meeting Minutes - 6/16/98 GOAL STATEMENTS VOTES C. Monticello should pursue economic development 1 as a means toward achieving other community goals. II. What quality of economic development should the City pursue? A. The City should focus its pursuit on new and 10 existing high quality, high investment businesses. B. Monticello should focus on mid-level businesses. 0 C. Monticello should focus its efforts on expanding 1 or entry-level businesses. D. Monticello should consider each potential 9 business individually on a case-by-case basis. III. How should the City utilize its financial incentives? A. The City should utilize its financial strength to 9 attract business. B. The City should utilize its finandal strength to 3 improve and maintain the city's infrastructure. C. Monticello should utilize its financial strength to 7 improve its "quality of life." D. Monticello should return the maximum amount 0 of its financial strength to the taxpayers without spending it. IV. On what land uses should the City focus its economic development incentives? A. The City should focus its spending on housing 1 and redevelopment efforts. B. The City should focus its spending on commercial 2 development efforts. C. The City should focus its spending on industrial 17 development efforts. Page 2 9 Special Joint Meeting Minutes - 6/16/46 Economic Development Director 011ie Koroprhak reported that the areas currently considered in recruiting industry include employee salaries and benefits, financial strength, tax base, community involvement, and spin-off benefits. The group discussed potential housing goal statements, and it was noted by the City Planner that more than two-thirds of the current housing in Monticello is below the break-even point of paying for services and that it is difficult to maintain a tax base if low-end housing is excessive. Following are the results of the housing goal discussion. GOAL STATEMENTS I. How does Monticello perceive the role of housing growth in the city? A Is housing a support system for the City's 18 other uses? B. Is housing an economic development sector 0 in itself? II. What kind(s) of housing does the City wish to promote? A. Monticello wishes to promote middle and 4 higher -end housing only. B. Monticello wishes to promote low to moderate 0 market housing only. C. Monticello wishes to promote a Hill range 4.6 of housing. D. Monticello should monitor rather than promote 12.6 housing activity [and promote where a void ezistal. III. What role does the City have in allocating housing development to different locations? A. Monticello needs to actively utilize its zoning 16 power. B. Monticello should consider the provision of 2 residential land base on specific requests, case-by-case. Page 3 Special Joint Meeting Minutes - 5/15/95 4A Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Monticello is being considered by the Minnesota Sports Federation as a site for a regional sports facility, which may present an opportunity for a cooperative effort toward development of a family/education/sports center. The Sports Federation would solicit corporate donations from throughout the state for funding of the center, and user fees would pay for day-to-day operations and taxes. The City is asked to determine to what extent development of a regional sports facility will contribute toward accomplishing City goals. O'Neill reviewed a list of current and potential activities in the community and problems associated with each. He noted that the City and School District have recently been attempting to jointly plan and combine resources for facilities such as meeting rooms, community kitchen, etc. Concerns were expressed regarding possible difficulties for the School District in scheduling events at the sports facility and possible difficulties relating to the facility being constructed on School District property. It was suggested that additional information is needed regarding the Federation and the facility prior to making a commitment to the project O'Neill was directed to continue efforts toward developing a cooperative City/School plan for development of community facilities. 4B. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Monticello has also been approached as a possible site for an upscale outlet mall. A potential site for the mall would be north of the Middle School, which is presently toned business campus and represents a major part of the industrial land inventory. He noted that a zoning amendment would be necessary to support an outlet mall at that site, which would require a 4/5 vote by the City Council. City Engineer Bret Weiss reported that two major transportation improvements would be needed to support this project: 1) a freeway off -ramp and on-ramp, and 2) realignment of the Oakwood Drive intersection. He noted that these improvements are currently planned for the future but would need to be done 34 years earlier to accommodate a project such as an outlet mall. Discussion focused on reviving the downtown area versus commercial development in other areas of the city along with traffic problems that would occur on Highway 25 if a mall was constructed in this area in addition to the rpcently- platted Monticello Business Center. Charlie Pfeffer, owner of the property being considered by the outlet mall, requested feedback as to whether or not the City is interested in this type of development, as he would focus his efforts elsewhere if the City is not comfortable with this prgjoet. Page 4 0 Special Joint Meeting Minutes - 611MM Assistant Administrator ONeil1 noted that he will be meeting with outlet mall ofdals on Wednesday, May 17, to obtain additional information on the project and will report back to Council axordingly. There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned. Karen Doty Office Manager Pale 5 9 Council Agenda - 6/22/96 3A. Consideration to aODoint an HRA Commissioner. (O.K.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the HRA meeting of May 16, 1995, existing HRA Commissioners and Councilmembers Clint Herbst and Tom Perrault interviewed Mr. Roger Carlson for the HRA seat vacated by the retirement of Ben Smith. Initially, two individuals applied for the vacant seat. At the last minute, John Duffy, the second candidate, withdrew his application because his profession demanded an increase of time and commitment. Following the interview and discussion, HRA Commissioners elected not to re - advertise for the vacated seat and unanimously approved a motion recommending the City Council consider the name of Roger Carlson for appointment to the HRA Commission. The expiration date of this five-year term is December 1996. The intent of Mr. Carlson, upon appointment to the HRA by the City Council, is to resign from the Parks Commission. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONa: 1. A motion approving the appointment of Roger Carlson as a Commissioner of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. 2. A motion denying the appointment of Roger Carlson as a Commissioner of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. 9. A motion of other action. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supporta the HIWs recommendation. Mr. Carlson's resume was well written, his responses to questions were well thought-out, and he has some experience with governmental entities. Additionally, he runs a local business and was born and raised in Monticello. Mr. Carlson's resume. Roger A. Carlson APPLICATION FOR HRA POSITION 208 Kevin Longley Drive P.O. Box 1008 Monticello, MN 55362 295-2153 home 295.2916 office EDUCATION AND OCCUPATION 1976 Graduate Monticello High School 1977-79 Attended North Hennepin Community College majoring In accounting and economics 1983 December: Graduate B.A. Political Science University of Minnesota 1985 June: Graduate B.S. Mortuary Science University of Minnesota 1985 June to Present: Licensed mortician and partner of Peterson-Grlmsmo Funeral Chapel of Monticello COMMUNITY AND CIVIC INVOLVEMENT Member Monticello Rotary Club since 1986, Board member of club since 1993 Member Monticello Chamber of Commerce since 1986 Member Rotary District 5950/5960 Youth Exchange Committee. Youth Exchange Officer for Norway (Includes central Minnesota and western Wisconsin) since 1993 Member Monticello Parks Commission since Summer 1992 Past member of various committees at Riverside Alliance Church BACKGROUND I was born In Montloello and with the exception of living In the Twin Cities for 3 and one half years while attending college. I have made Monticello my home for my entire life. My wife Sonja (Grimsmo) and I have two daughter ages 8 and 5 and have lived In the Par West addition of Monticello for the past seven years. I throughly enjoy being involved In the 'business' of dry business. My time spent on the Parks Commission has been very rewarding personally In that I feet I have been able to be a small part of the betterment of Monticello for the future. I am very committed to Monfloello and can say that I will be living In this city for the remainder of my life. My job is here. my family Is here, and I have every Intention of being here as well. The Parks Commission experience has only made me have more of a desire to be of service to my community. 1 firmly belleve that the HRA can and will have a large and noticeable effect on the way our dry will move ahead In the years to come. I would look forward to the opportunity of being of fuller service to the pe oe of Monticello as a member of the HRA. I will be very honest by saying that I have a limited knowledge of the exact functions of the HRA In the past, but I am very aware of the challenges and concerns that face Monticello In the future; and I arm aware of the Impact that the HRA can have on the future of our city. I would look forward to the opportunity of service on the HRA. I believe that I have Insights and talents that could have a positive Impact If I am able to serve on this commission. I have throughty, enjoyed being a part of the Parks Commission. but feel the time may be right to redirect my efforts In community service. REFERENCES 1) Barry Fluth Owner Masters Home Fumishings. Monticello Known for 20 years 2) Thomas Pogatchnik President First National Bank. Monticello Known for 5 years 3) Dr, Christopher B. Hall Chiropractor, Monticello Known for 7 years I authorize Investigation of all statements contained herein and the references listed above to give you any and all pertinent information they may have, and release all parties fromallliability for any damage that may result from furnishing same to you. /tpr; Date 1 , 27, l49S Signed ,,,r Rogdr-A Carlson 0 Council Agenda - 6/22/96 39. Consideration of onrchass of a 1 -ton bucket truck. U.S.) i1. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the May 8, 1995, Council meeting, staff presented information regarding the possible purchase of a 1 -ton bucket truck that would not only serve as a bucket truck but would alsu serve as transportation within the parks and street department, thereby combining two vehicles into one. City Council restricted the budget to $10,000 and any proposed purchase beyond $10,000 would have to be brought back to the City Council for further consideration. During the past two weeks we have located two 1 -ton bucket trucks with utility bodies. nl{a W City Truck: We located a 1983 Ford 1 -ton bucket truck in Kansas City through a trucker's advertisement paper. The truck had a 30 -foot Telsa telescoping boom, 130,000 miles, and a steel utility body. The body was rusted out above the wheels, and the bottoms of the doors on the truck were rusted. The bucket portion of the unit was said to be in good operating condition, although the telescoping type may limit our use of the unit and appears to be more difficult to get parte and service for than a more common Versa Lift. The engine in the truck was in poor condition and knocked when warm. The firm price for the truck is $10,500. The truck dealer indicated that he may throw in a high -mileage, used 351 engine for us or would be willing to have the engine rebuilt or replaced at our cost. Iie indicated the price of $10,600 was firm, as when he took the truck he did not realise it needed an engine and that was his investment in the truck. This unit did not appear to be what we were really looking for. South &nd Jndiapa Tj=k. We were able to locate a 1985 Ford 1 -ton bucket truck in Indiana through one of the requests we had left with another dealer. The truck is located at the Morphis Motor Company and is said to be in excellent condition, although it does have 143,000 miles on it. The following is a list of the basic equiprnent on the truck: 6.9 diesel engine, manual transmission, PTO power for lift PS 235.16 steel radials, good condition paint, silver/gray, no rust utility body with bores on both sides. 28 -foot Versa Lift with 33 -foot working height, 300-1b. bucket capacity with winter heat, ground level remote and bucket controls with 110 outlets in the bucket. mobilo electric power provided by Electro Equipment, includes hydraulic oil cooling system. The truck has been serviced, everything has been checked, and it is ready to go. The seking price of this unit is $19,600. Additional information on the unit to being sent to us by mail. We haus checked on the cost of flying out to have a nwhanir, look at the unit and/or drive it back. One-way coach lair would be approximately 5300. If the unit Council Agenda - 5/22/96 is not satisfactory, it would be another $300 to fly back. If the Council is willing to spend the additional funds, we would do some additional checking and receive pictures of the unit before we went out to look at it. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The fust alternative would be to authorize the City to expend funds to further check out the truck in South Bend, Indiana, for possible purchase of the unit at $12,500. 2. The second alternative would be to increase the expenditure from $10,000 to $16,000 and allow staff to check on the truck in South Bend, Indiana, and if that one doesn't work out, to continue looking for a truck up to $16,000 without having to bring it back to the City Council. 3. The third alternative would be to change our thinking here and look at purchase of the pickup truck as originally planned for $8,000 and a larger bucket truck, which may be able to be found for a little less than the 1 -ton bucket truck. The drawback here, of course, is that we would then have two vehicles to maintain, provide storage space for, and insure. And, the larger bucket trucks do require more maintenance at a higher cost. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director, Street & Parks Superintendent, and the City Administrator that the Council consider increasing the allowable expenditure for the bucket truck to $16,000 as outlined in alternative 02. The recommendatinn from the last agenda by staff was that the expenditure be set between $10,000 - $20,000. It is our opinion that we need a piece of equipment that has dual purpose, to limit storage space needed and operation or maintenance cost of the unit. And, to find a unit that is in good serviceable condition and gp�f , we believe the expenditure could approach $16,000. This alternative 02 would allow us to look at purchase of the 1 -ton truck in South Bcnd, Indiana, and if that one doesn't pan out, it would allow us to continue looking without having to come back to the City Council and lose the opportunity to purchase a truck should we find one that is an exceptional deal like the first one we ran across in Michigan for $9,000. We have learned that Wright Hennepin Electric will have a well -used 1 -ton truck up for auction or bids in We near future, so we will investigate that also. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Additional information on the truck in Indiana will be provided at Monday night's meeting if it arrives in time. Council Agenda - 6/22/95 3C. Ceonsiderajign of it mo- ration aoorovin:< the issoangp gf a ffamblina license to MLBA Childreals Fend - Joyner Lanes. (RW.) A. REFERENCE AND BMKGROUND: The MLBA Children's Fund (Minnesota Loom Beverage Association) is requesting approval from the City for operating a pull -tab gambling operation at Joyner Lanes this thll. The applicant is a charitable organization based out of Minneapolis that contributes funds to various organizations related to youth activities. In order for the organization to receive a pull -tab license in Monticello, the City Council must pass a resolution approving the application before the State will consider issuing the license. Joyner Lanes has allowed pull -tabs to be available for a number of years at their facility, and the operation is currently run by the Monticello Jaycees. Joyner Lanes has now decided to allow the MLBA Children's Fund to operate in their facility, and the Jaycees will terminate their pull -tab activity later on this summer. Although 1 am not familiar with the MLBA Children's Fund, Pam Dane, owner of Joyner Lanes, felt they were a reputable organization that donates to many children fund-raisers such as Headstart, the Ramsey County Safety Programs, and the Minneapolis Park Board as examples, and they will accept a request for donations locally. Since they are new to this area, we have no history to go on as to where the actual donations will be made; but if the Council approves this license, we can request a summary upon renewal in the Ihture. Adopt a resolution approving the application for the pull -tab license by the MLBA Children's Fund. This resolution is Wen submitted along with the application to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board for their consideration. Do not adopt the resolution supporting the application. It is my understanding that the State will not issue a license unless the City adopts the resolution supporting the application. Council Agenda - faWA5 As in the past, the Council has taken the position of authorizing various charitable organizations to obtain gambling licenses for fadlities in Monticello. In the past, the City requests financial information and donation history upon renewal requests; but since this is a new operation to Monticello, this information would not be available at this time. Staff is not aware of any reason why the Council would not approve the resolution allowing the State to issue the license. Copy of application; Proposed resolution. S I' � °^"' RESOLUTION 9& RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A GAMBLING LICENSE WHEREAS, the MLBA Children's Fund of Minneapolis has submitted an application to the City Council of Monticello for issuance of a charitable gambling license to conduct gambling at Joyner Lanes located in Monticello, Minnesota, and WHEREAS, upon review of the organization's activities, the Council is not opposed to the gambling license being issued by the State Gambling Control Board, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that the MLBA Children's Fund application for license issuance listed above is hereby approved, and the State Gambling Control Board is authorized to process the application. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of May, 1996. Mayor City Administrator FOR BOARD 115E ONLY L0214 BASE 1 02M) FP e FEE LaulfW Gambling CHECK Premises Permit Application - Part 1 of 2 INMALS DATE clans a praedaos porwa 0 -. Ranara ue.a OVA oiQmdratlon baso 600rw r.anba. [j 10SM Nhmb& npmardr, vim. mteoa, binp prsmisa crani: rsarme► � B (til N4l-aft Cpbosnts p.ddooftmb. mMa Maar A-o4ocrl O cwM awaar O D(aleol PAM" M* !oiga>niiaeidR Iijj'"erireiiKon • . _ _ E Name of Orpsr*Mbcn &AeU Amefa Q- bVM or V. O um No not as mo arra at tan 9 amnapart nuana C40 o Y M anon. runbor rh.n c\.N Mw 5'S4,1 ( nn0.^ MAX) S-�.ft 31 S3 Normo d tldoi` (ctum b. Now+ 0 0 a—por) TIN p0» awnior Bingo y .. W, t, • (4u ) � 3-uv4 if aDD�B for aOaclass A or C lam. 8D in days and boWniog @ ending tours of btogo occasions: No more tban seven bingo oKasla ns may be conducted by yours per week Dw . BqMulunWIn"Eburs ow /ins Hours Dq B /F1dtn4Hours N. to Ubtap Will not be Conducted. chock bine M3-- [GaatblW Pretniaes Iaforoiatloa urge "moo"' a.racrw Amo �l uw. con aua boa =noorl I..I ,": laft bca.d aD1br dy kart T tla CO No a n4 is ows* p apwWgudZ.0 G unhoorporand n" -.to, Wiore oambCnp N Y bc.YO Oa Town ft aW Casrb sdw. g g proMaw lsIocaW a owWft d Gy Nmb r� .v U o I raceV Huns.rd Md*w 0oaM1 d pwadae Clq MUD ap Code Lion toys apsOwnnamn n dr, ovWOrp s1i rdr e pwanY.ss an aro coo p ved cia .0 d na.aacn d� p .WNdi ba(bento= *Mwe.baban omYear. • . Wq d. sande d b Boor pLa stA AiasrWorn 00A0 %AW Damn is bang b s" A bass wd daM we rot MQAIQ W Chas 0 epplamns hep of r'svaee of ollobliag.ecMil meat "Cow •r����* ^ "' ' . _ . . Tj/� Qns ag CU 4a~td lA" A/ vh.v ti 13 4"1 39rmaota baudW CambUng Premise Permit Application - Part 2 of 2 �o�aiyn�bUrea_Barek law apucM 5,���; ,V �- St � ,I Mw s "Nemo,:. .heft-aVj ion.AAaWdSDs�ard.anamct.�pasio¢;d«ldi 1_._ua.:'1....=...:c::�_._._,.._.'...aban�aw)..m,..w..�Mrd.�etr►,kaArx,:.r ,._ _,.,.....�::5'::k.��d'- Kau �u�h4Nn /4l a /.Jc.-,LL R1„d 44, rnc.i 6CO r,.ocr ft.�b 4 ISI N. hyib MIN 5594b *up /— c.cr►I KY kr &,,./04 (c . � L MN S5 -)£G - (�a.,b.". �k Mc t 61- a.>'O pK A - Mai r •••���,•� lllt0 Aal�tloa •1 am aq Chkl tlWdNNa OIBOiI of Ow OrpalittffiIDII; 1 hereby eonaad tlrat bed Wv a otfloan. UN -1 ammo full MsporaY> wy br tM Wend low opow board of apM o! Oro b" cr Ow aommfts arar at Om d a0 a dW a to be aonEudod: ravaum or pLab adoy. or op m or tM commAubwa. 44 va fmwwrits mywY wit to bn of 111nnasoro dmb1fto , - ow bar. gynyrp In W pambMg ad rub= d the board and a". Saab 8txotdo The board Is au0wdaed b Yapoal Ow W* romrda Gift deo• Y laffw d: m a to t by thxa laws and rulaa 1O �: pamhYrp acwtud whwww noma y b NO 4Mftkch gn In appb fWormdbn bo nub to M app roqubemwft d can M pamb" rubs and Ian. uni2n d b Uw board and bed unit al poaornmorrt wi1Nn 10 days dM �b dOw ' g":aW dodwo dw: •1 urb rawW Md bMn to WwAdo mqulrod Inbormatlon Ihave rood ftaXU=fbn wW d bdmmabon wAmMod &providing lobo a mbloadbp Lnbmmion may ru&A b Ora bard b bun aearaato and aom0 . Ow dadw or moatbn cd du lieanao. d ad w mquhd bftmatbn hu boars NDy diadoeed: Sipnaaue dW "am" olio Om 1. The dy �naut alpn tb appllCbbn Y tlr� fAO Oren► l A mev of the kraal rrnN d aevemmenre rrrtreMbn no- bogy is bested ourMID -A dry limboMMUM 2 Tire ny "eamahp" moat airs ftapp0aatbn Y G Y M aXQ=bn b danW by Oa beat =k of pororrmrort, Y a%XM not to VAWJ d to to Qw bOnp GW&d Burd. Ore pambloip prambea b beatad vrChb a townahlp 3 The bew wo govavnnwro (dp a MMM moa pan a M-ko rr wodla* wpv ft or Oen"" app8eatlon. CIM or County" 04FdCoM Hmo Sdraaae d penton reabkb a00baot+ rtae I par aaahed Roby d as batudl u b aplwd attaefarnb rraaY o: aewkaaa aea aeare I'mm ift; va.! ars ibw x711 tIR Dow $ Rant a R000vOlk M 8117 ToarM*: By aWA- bobw. Or bwMhO adulovbdpe Vo Olo orgaNn*m Is alppfflnp Im a premha pwft vMhkr bamahb umftL Townsfdp" Tosavdt Masa WOM— d parson re-- To I am gdwd , 35(3C -D 1.4C202 i1 bmetDta Lawful GmtbHng ttarteTw> LEASE AGREEMENT • Pro .,OwnenZessw lnfar.*. 1 Num of Segal Owner of Prspe"y SUM Address City �1ZayGohe Pbme ln" gee d o APreuf�a A Tac. 'P� ToryrJer- holies /O/ d0/2) 7-91-3390 I•Lme Q(L. t Street Addtoa Cay mss ` aYWm Phome (This may or may am be The mote m the legal Oeste of the Pmpesty) SA -411 ( ) Name of Leaadd PStrea Addmix City Zip Day— Pbom rr a /oi oc /(e % /ton Arc ello A& rrs b t (4A sere -33 Sot Norm a Ieam plume of O�atiiatsm tuWhg the plea . i OM Iicerue r of o a zia m D"om Ph= 46A C,,1(�.�r;� h,,,d di ogcxn� (Gu»s t3 G"'asiblligjerli+lty'andReatLtjonuallow: Type of Qambl6Tg scd* q mai rill be eonftAW st this Qamblaw pemiao (Cb=k a0 that apply toUric pmhlinp pemiaa) C3 ft4P Co Ranks M P&"Mwbaeb ® Puo-ubs ® 7lpbwrds Rem Information (Sae Role 7661.0060. Subp 2D) Indicate Out tents paid by your orpnma" to me kuw C m A ad Cpromo pffoo b rew por Agin oacaim Ctm 8 ad D psnwiro pawiot ear Per mow k: Rem for bbw tad M other pmWittS s......o omductod Real for femn of kwtW pmbtlog acavuy other thin bmp during mat bingo oondoo may om monad: tory not -meed a mnotman of f 1000 per tm 1h. f2W for up to 6.000 squen feet: saw for up m 12.000 squats fat VA SM for mote mm 12.000 agues foci au Ran to be paid per bmpo saaam f Rea to be said per mmm S 5 Q o Was may oma band an a prRanhp of seeatpts Dam brwnd gotblioa or ameadam as a Maps occubm . An mpokesbo may sou pay nota m Itself or to any of Its afflUates for apes rued for sloe conduct of bwfd prebUng. Effective Date for Amended Lean AVeements Plan list the cMective dace on which the attta . e; to mo onoul loot w0 oke Yu LAO dimammn of a6 stew leased by your o%som hm for SuOtinp activity an premnea: She Mand men are: (set by fol for a tow of squats fes fed by (tet fer • tool of 4' aguao [at. W by fest 0w a tool of aghwe feu. feet by feet for a tool of square feet. ICombined WW M agues motap I SubmU • -Leer! (dr u Wo of the gambtWg pnmbm This must show The kation of your wpituauorn leased tow for the Twrduct of 4wtW pmWina including oma kited mr asap of your pmMinp ptoduq m mu aanbbap permits. Be ase to writs the limo— of the leased area on the akach. nes oowumn ox not teatat am a not sAmR as uovp Tama sad Days d Olep Oaasboo (far Cls A or C pnW- prrmks) (f you checked WW scu" above, yes emm Q to ON bine days anti Woo below. Circle a.m. o pmL do each btymriag and atelft moo. A Mp ecoum must camintte Ibr to kast 1•Ir2 Ewes (90 mi pAcs) but CJmmt uned @m (4) eamecub" hewn tad at Inst IS burps panha must be held a each A^ orgtAmbon (m a whole) may not cmduct mote dwdanon (7) bongo occamu each wed. Begin AL (a.m.'PAL) Fids At: (a.mrp.m.) On My of Wad Begin At (amrp,m.) Cads AL (L".m.) On Dry of Mrd Beyro AL (am�'p,M.) Cads AL (Lmlp.m,) On Dry of Wsc► Regina At: (cm p m.) EMs AL (Lrn.rp m ) On Day of V td Begun At (amfp m, ) Eads At (a m rp m.) On Day of MEd Begin AL (am PAL) Eads AL (s.mlp.m.) On Day of 11kd Bgms At: (om.�p m.) Eads AL (a.mip m.) On Dry of Week f� a&= By agrulag to the terms q/dds faase, iris maamfb agnrcd drat: (Mr. " ) 'ween rasing 0- a kmmed botgo ha lbs km must k imM twee of the ptvpem y 'She aware of or popery at do Iona may mart rmwAWpmbtusg a One p=at s 'Slat less of the psenue, his a he mwfi m fimly, ed any ayems of mrpbya a d the knee my not petitipaa u playm in ap taodu¢t of Lawfid gambbea an the kamd prem m . 'Sbo ktar and the ksm do not haw a dings or m6mcl finescid atones in tho di u Mmao or man dumm of egttipstemt nU kbor of Ca: , i a w•tb &Bow tht Bold car rg nb d lht Board, the Comm matcr d public Safety or epma of the ot>mmcsicioon, or tho Cammmmm of Rema or agem of the commomm. and 4w mfmacrom paaoote! to mapena M premiss as any reastmble timr, ad paw me oWums nioo OD candoct kwttd gmblin d dte pteoua aomrdma aro the lama of this kam The koro buy not amore any fmdmma on the apnizatiora atadmy distributors of gambrum egtipmont aervibes Car the me of prodita 'Sha otpniaooe bent obtain an atyyotatim lineae, gmmftg maW fiaons and a pramiro pemn Sam the Oamb&j Coated Board The ana be respoci6k for cmOft with the haws and ratio d lwwfW pmM 'Tl.e teem of do km AAD be oatstsbmm rib ars Ia permit. • 'She opminm mm bgm at the pmblma prommm. a cwmu invorawy of gambbrg cvgmm. a tiatrb rah dimmsms of Cr prtmua awa%bW for mvw% a d a clan plryaat mcgruauon or dtvde tetwrvs the kaaos's pmbbaa egtdpmmt std the kaA bmmta erlmI 'She c miatim wil be n-mnble for emtoa.g that the ksstrti btnmen acovam ue rot omducbd an the kased W�+ss 'Tbe bore dug be uxmu and immediately for any dkgd pmbluta violibm oocurtma an the prsaisa 'Tho kttor of the pm.inta shag pronde the knee soon to ase pemtimbd pttatun dumstg any time toamon" sad oema i to conduct bwiW pmbhq on the pt n iss and a agrmd upon in this kora 'Tae kaon Ad m mod'dy, tettmom or rdm an snow &a km m whale a an pat bewsse the atpniamm reparmd to a am or kcal bnw erdbrotmcal authotib at the Bard Cr om m ov a the sive d dcSA pmbiny aeti" in which ON OqW121600 did m paracipma . '(Wria m any athe conditions or .mimeo CW wig be ududd u pan of the ka. Attach addumal abtaa if �[(ottcssry) .. T. Le,*N MO.� /1 tri m',fW �r Pi4.i (k.i•/ t..r. lxn C441 e.J.-,J4Ael FBf 1 • Thais I aus b Wa aul Od orgy agremuam bottom the km and the etaaWMM onsdumna kwNl -AMing Ku"Um Tbtra is st a" tpOnmmt ad no other ami0catim reamed betrao the pangs as b We kwOd pmMing orad other t armors .armd to tau kaaa A"ch in this ken cum bs a xnmed b flan %) mb i Conor Emd within 10 days ''•r• 'dap Cla?- _ .. boaamof tent wa - sip snarl of arptnmtlp ofFkW (rop) 00" CEO �f Time of Lrb. Swig," Tkb of L. Sv wy CEO CCo A copy of thY tau end a datcb. w1A ddwdbba bps to submilad .m alae prreiss pools appRcadoR pnoubr t..,• pamM appleadon name" or vasa asp bbupe m the baa aoassma aaaa rrrr m.as aaatlira l rrrarae ds�l wraaaaaeraear.r as.d�rrat. YatYaa.rr ar.aawsr er tsaarr rrrweaaatrialarYa rwrsast�r�sr�rrorrelarYrer�r+.bepre rr.�rr.� rr•rlatrW rq.r YaYr�A�s Mrwaf.�rlrr.ar,Y r.ra�Yaral.aa�a �ae.graY r raarrrrraearrrsar.r��a�.Yt rare.uarrs rs..ut. r �. �arsrOelarf�r/Y/.a rrwrss��.rrr U.—M.1.Y.}torr Y—rwA.—rrrrr..A.rdb— edr w. .br��.a.�Yawlrrr.r.r.ae w.�r d.r..r rdrY..Yer.sb w �areawrlr•..rnsr♦.adr..rlrsrrYariq a�at:��errrrer►rfrY�aapt'�earaerr.dlrarr dlmbl r.arrrrY .+•a.►Yr..mbw�ruer srwr sa�..a..r carr r. c�r.rar.�.sr.a.e arMw stir aarrh.rrrr.s .s�rsrsra mrsse.^rarr.r.rrr�a�rrs.rrr rdr.as won rslrrare�l ti err. W t. r �..rsasrrtse�Yrrr.tssr�rse..r..eatrArw.re.rrrrr.rr. /s area mpard rinarb on IT= a" a" tb ummom Rah? Yns a li0aa37Jf 31. 3C —E Tlr asAhwr.t w+tt M res awetlas w.ervsrnr Rtwsr n. talar tilt~ beiatt rise. sspsap. w�r^ C—u�cs 4rL4 _p A �J G � rF� fit Cb Council Agenda - 5/22^95 30. Consideration of nom Ving Rale of tax -forfeited land parcels by the County Auditor. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Wright County Auditor's office is preparing for an upcoming public auction sale of tax -forfeited parcels for nonpayment of property taxes. The tax -forfeited parcels proposed for sale in the near future are those that have not paid property taxes since 1979. The County is asking for our approval to proceed with a public auction on one parcel that was originally tax -forfeited in 1992 but was riot sold, as there were no bidders willing to pay the appraised price at that time. The parcel in question is Lot 10, Block 3, Hoglund Addition, which is located along Mississippi Drive. This residential lot needs soil corrections to make it a buildable site and is probably the reason it has not yet soldL For your information, the County Auditor will soon be adding a number of additional parcels to the public auction process. The County Auditor is currently working on additional parcels that will include tax -forfeited lots in the Meadow Oak subdivision and those individual lots the City will acquire for the Eastwood Knoll development. The County has also requested verification of the outstanding special assessments remaining unpaid against the lot in the Hoglund Addition that is being tax - forfeited. I have reviewed the figures provided by the Auditor's office and agree with their calculations setting the special assessment balance at $9,637.35. At this time, I do not know of any reason why the City would want to acqudre this lot in the Hoglund Addition, and I assume the Council will authorize the parcel to be sold at public auction. Adopt a resolution approving Lot 10, Block 3, Hoglund Addition, U be sold at public auction by the Wright County Auditor's office and verifying that the special assessments outstanding against this parcel amount to $9,537.35. Do not approve the parcel for public auction --this option would be selected if the Council has an interest in acquiring the parcel themselves. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the staffs recommendation that the Council approve the parcel for public auction by the County and adopt the resolution as proposed. The ataff can see no benefit to the City acquiring ownership of "a parcel at this time. D. SUPPORTING DATA Copy of resolution; Information provided by County Auditor on tax -forfeited parcel. RESOLUTION a& RESOLUTION APPhOVING THE BALE OF TAX FORFEITED LAND PARCEL WHEREAS, a parcel of land in the city of Monticello bearing tax ID #155-014- 003100, 156-014003100, Lot 10, Block 3, Hoglund Addition, has been forfeited to the State of Minnesota for nonpayment of property taxes and is being prepared for public sale under tax -forfeited land sale procedures of Minne to Statutes, Chapter 282, and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has no interest in acquiring the said parcel for public purposes at this time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City of Monticello hereby approves that parcel 4155-014-003100 be placed on the public auction sale. 2. The City of Monticello certifies that the unpaid special assessments owing against the tax -forfeited parcel listed above amounts to $8,637.35, and any remaining amounts unpaid as a result of a public sale shall be reassessed for a period not to exceed 5 years at an interest rate of 8% annually. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of May, 1895. Mayor City Administrator Darla M. Groshens April 20, 1995 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR-1REAS11RER 10 2nd Street NW - Rm. 230 Buffalo MN 55313-1195 Request for Approval for Sale of Tax Forfeited Land Parcels: Enclosed is a classification list of non -conservation property located in your municipality. The described parcels forfeited to the State of Minnesota for non-payment of property taxes. The parcels on this list were included on the Non -Conservation Classification List approved by the Board of Wright County Commissioners on April 18, 1995 by Resolution 195-27. As provided in Minnesota Statutes 282, we raqueat that you: 1. Approve the parcel(s) for public auction, or 2. Request a conveyance to your municipality for public use without monetary consideration. We also require that the form "Application by a Governmental Subdivision for Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Land" be completed and returned to our office with a copy of the City Council/Town Board Resolution requesting conveyance, or 3. If acquisition of a parcel by a governmental subdivision is anticipated, then you may also make a written request that certain parcels be withheld from public auction for one year. Please provide City Council/Town Board Certification, which addresses both types of special assessments listed below: 1. Attached in a list showing the balance of any unpaid canceled special assessments at the time of forfeiture and that may be reassessed. Please certify that three are the correct amounts. If there is a discrepancy, Please contact our office. It would also be helpful, when selling the property, if you could tell us. at this time. how long any reassessment would run and at what interest rate it would be computed. We apply approximately 901 of the sale price towards paying off the special assessments. 2. Any new spec'iole assessed during 1996 for first year payable in 1995. We need both the Bale approval and special assessment information included in the City Council/Town Board Resolution. Although State law deems the sale automatically approved if the City Council/Town Board (silo to respond within ninety (90) days of this notice, we ask that you do respond. If you have any questions. please call our office at 682-7579. DMGtgg WRIGHT WOPlY BOARD RESOLUTION RD. 95-27 WHEREAS, The County Board of Commissioners of the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, desires to offer for sale certain parcels of land that have forfeited to the State of Minnesota for non-payment of taxes, and WHEREAS. Said parcels of land have been viewed by the County Board of Commissioners and have been classified as non -conservation lands as provided for in Minnesota Statutes 282.01. HDW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED That the Wright County Board of Commissioners hereby certify that the parcels of land on the attached list have been viewed and comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 85.012, 92.461, ,282.01, Subd. 8, and 282.018, and other statutes that require the withholding of tax -forfeited lands for sale. BE IT FUHlHgI RESOLVED That the Wright County Board of Comaissionero hereby request approval from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for the sale of said lands. Form No. 4t0A — Land Cles0k aftm (COINMAM • melon) PouCw. We. CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY BOARD OF CLASSIFICATION OF FORFEITED LANDS AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 386, LAWS 1935 AS AMENDED. Tothe (Town City) Board of Ow City - of Monticello We, the members of the County Board of the Comfy of Wr igh= Wwwasom do hereby catty that the parcels of lend herehafter fisted are aD of the tends whfah have been dasWW by us a nation tends, from the Iist of lards forfeited to the Stated Mbalesota for non-payment d taxes fa the yes, - years/97_% — as provided by wmesota Statutes 1946. Section 28WI as mneraded 9xa T ucr AppraMd Wale AOPateW VaW VISION lel Bbd( Ralgr dyad or lr n lDNfICE= CITi 155-014-003100 Lot 10. Block 3. HOGLUND ADDITION. 10 3 38.500 00 Speciale after :orfel vre 1,037 '35 $9.537 35 The foregoing classification ie hereby approved. Dated: . 19 By the Board/Council of the of 3b -D 155-014-003100 784[ (76 S&W Imp.) $ 7,348.16 90611 (Del. Having) 94.50 91611 (Del. Services) 36.68 90411 (89-02 Impr.) 577.76 $ 8,057.10 30-E 2i Council Agenda - 5/22/95 3E. Consi ftrajlon of a resolution calling for a oublic hearinaL regarding g pnodlfied hgusinq,pEffram antii isquan-e of r, ggpnue bomds for the I ississinni Shores Senior Housing PMect. (R.W.) A. REFERENCFiAND BACKGROUND: As you may be aware, the Mississippi Shores Senior Housing Project has not been progressing as fast as originally planned due to a shortage of equity that is still needed in the project to allow it to continue. The Senior Housing Alliance Board, along with the developer, Presbyterian Homes, has been trying to find a way to keep the project alive by obtaining additional equity through grants or other sources. It now appears that the most feasible way of continuing the project will be for Presbyterian Homes, in conjunction with the Wetim Foundation, who plans to inject $160,000 into the project for the equity requirements, may be the beat way for the project to proceed. To do this, some of the past resolutions regarding the housing program adoption and the City's agreement to issue revenue bonds will need to be modified if the Council is supportive of the new entity owning the project. At this point in time, it is also the intent of the Monticello Senior Housing Alliance to possibly purchase the project from the Presbyterian Homes/ Wetim Affordable Housing Group after five years if the project is still viable. While it was initially thought that a community effort to own this project would be successful, I believe the Senior HousingAlliaace now feels it may be more beneficial for the private development to occur at the initial stages; and as long as the doors open for the Monticello Housing Alliance Group to purchase the property later on, it may be the only way this project can get off the ground. If the Council is still supportive of using the City's bonding authority for this new non-profit organization, you only need to adopt the resolution at this time calling for a public hearing that will be held at our next meeting June 12, 1995. Likewise, if for some reason the Council is uncomfortable with using our City name to allow tax exempt bonds to be issued to the new private Presbyterian Homea/Wetim Affordable Housing Group, you do not have to call for a public hearing; but likewise, the project will likely be dead. H. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing for modifying the housing program and for issuance of revenue bonds to a new non- profit organization. Do not adopt the resolution. Council Agenda - M2/95 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: I believe the staff has had concerns whether this project would ever materialize due to the inability to generate enough equity up front. With the Senior Housing Alliance now proposing to allow the Presbyterian Homes and a separate foundation be the owners and managers of the project in the initial years, it may be the best mute to take if we all still want to see this project proceed. In all likelihood, using the City's name to issue revenue bonds under this new non-profit organizational group may even be better than having the Senior Housing Alliance as the owner because of the additional equity that will be at the beginning of the project. If the project is suooessfid, the Housing Alliance will have the option of obtaining ownership afar five years by purchasing the project. At this point, there should not be any reason why you would not want to adopt the resolution at least calling for the public hearing for June 12. At that time, a final decision can be made on whether you are still in agreement with the concept. P. SUPPORTING DATA Copy of proposed resolution for adoption. �� Y R=LUTION NO. RESOLUTION CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A , ,w i. w:., HOUSOIG PROGRAM AND ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES. CHAPTER 4840 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councilof the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") as follows: Section I. Recitaht. 1.01. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 482C (the "Act") authorises the City to issue revenue bonds to finance the aoqWdtim and construction of maltifemay housing developments. 1.04. Section 482C.01 of the Act requires that In order carry out a Project, the City must develop a housing plan ("Plan") and a housing program ("Prog7am") and hold a public heating thereon. 1.05. On March 15, 1884, the City Council held a public hearing on and adopted a Plan and Program in connection wiffi a proposal by Monticello Senior Housing Alliance, Ino. , a Minnesota nonprofit corlpomtion ("Senior Alliance") that the City issue bonds in the approximate principal amount not to exceed $3,500,000 (the "Sonde") to finance a proposed aonlor hous1W facility under the Act. The proposed Program cmdats of a 48-uzdt multSfemW natal housing facility intended primarily, for elderly persons to be located st 1415 Hart Boulevard in the City. 1.04. The City bas received a proposal to =odify the Program by providing that the housing facility is owned and Constructed by Presbyterian Homan Housing and Assisted Living, Inc.. a Minnesota profit corporation ("Preabyterlan Bomar Housing-), with the possibility of future transfer to Senior AUlanoe under certain terms and conditions. Section 2. Publio Hensing. 2.01. The City Council shall Moet at 9:00 p . m. on Monday. Juan 12, 1985, to Conduct a public hearing an tho proposed modi@ed housing program and fsstraaoe of Me Bonds as requested by Presbyterian Homo Housing. 9.02. The City Adadaietrator Is authorized and directed to publish notice of the hearing in substantially the form attached hereto as EWWt A in a newspaper of general circulation in the City once. at lout 18 days prior to the date d the public 110112109- 2.03. The Cannell hereby statei Its pralt d=ry intention to Issue the Bonds for the Program, subject to adoption of the modified Progtrm and cogHaaw with the terms and Coaditims of the Act and the f4aal agroomsnt among the City. Presbyterian Homes Housing and the bdtW purckwar of the Bonds as to the terms and conditions thueof. Approved by the City Council of the City of Monticello this 72nd day of lsay. 1995. Mayos ATTEST: City Admtalstratoz ICKMiT A CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEAR DYG ON A MODIFIED HOUSING PROGRAM AND ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE A THE MODIFIED PROGRAM UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C FOR THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTIFAMILY SENIOR HOUSING DEVU"MMT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the MmUcene, City Counan (the "Councn") will hold a public hearing on Monday, June 12, 1899 at 9:00 p.m. at City Hail, 250 East Broadway, Monticello. Minnesota, to consiQer a modified program for the Issuance of revenue bonds under M(anesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended, to finance a multifamily senior hour d: :..,.., :... (the "Program"). At the public hearing, the Council will consider adoption of a resolution approving the modstled bonatag program and giving pr elimfaary or final approval to the Issuance of :eoenue bonds under the Program- for the acquisition and constructIm of the Presbyterian Homes Senior Housing Project (the "Project"). The aggregate face amount of revenue bonds proposed to be timed to finance the Project Is presently estimated not to exceed $.3,500,000. The Project consists of a 48 -unit multifamily rental favi ty intended primarily for elderly persons, to be located at 1215 Hart Boulevard in the City of M=tloello, and will be owned and operated by Presbyterian Hames Housing and Assisted Living. Inc. The revenue bonds will be Issued by the City of Monttaa c, and will be limited obligations of the Issuer payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof, and will not be a general obligation of or be secured by the taring power of the City of Monticello. A copy of the proposed modified Program to an Me in City Hall. Anyone desiring to be board daring this public hearIng win be afforded an opyortunity to do so. Dated: [date of publication] BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NwMCELLO. HDWEMA By asneM iaaara? City Admtaistrator Council Agenda - 5122t95 s _ Consideration o(an uVdate tYpm the City Assessor on argpertia that were re-evaluates atter the Board of Review-Jertw Kramber. (R.W.) A _REFERENCE AtM—RACKGROUIMP: As you may recall fiam the Board of Review meeting held May 4, City Assessor Jerry Kramber was instructed to re-evaluate a number of parcels and report back to the City Council with his findings. Mr. Kramber has completed the process of re-examining those parcels and will be in attendance at the Council meeting Monday night to present his recommendations. After Mr. Kramber reviews the findings with the Council, the Council will be asked to accept or mom the recommendations as presented. Each property owner then has the opportunity to continue any appeal process by appearing before the Wright County Board of Equalization if they still feel their property values are not properly calculated. Additionally, this should now complete the assessment process for the 1994- 95 year. The Krambers have indicated that they are willing to continue on as the City Assessors for another year at the same contract rate of $5.75 per parcel. Unless I hear otherwise, I will be preparing a now contract for the 1995.98 assessment year. Accept the recommendations of the City Assessor in regard to the properties that wore requested to be reevaluated. Modify the Assessor's recommendations if the Council feels adjustments are warranted. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None at this time. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None. Council Agenda - &12W5 e. Conaide}•ajion of approval of-theurgliminary nlat f93 the Pinehurst residential subdivision. ADnllcant. Gene Bauer. AND 7. Consideration of aooroval of¢ conilitional use permit which would @dlow tw9 3 -unit townhomes in an R.2 district. Aonllcant. Gene Bauer. (J.0.) For the sake of efficiency, you are provided the same material that was provided to the Planning Commission regarding this item. Please note that the Planning Commission consideration included consideration of a variance request relating to the location of driveways and curb cuts. As a result of the discussion at the Planning Commission level, the applicant made some minor modifications to the site plan, which eliminated the need for the variance request. Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat and conditional use permit and recommended that both items for consideration be approved based on the finding that the preliminary plat and the conditional use permit will result in a development that is consistent with the character of the area and consistent with the purpose and intent of the R-2 zoning district objectives. DECISION ONE Motion to approve the preliminary plat of the Pinehurst residential subdivision based on the finding provided by the Planning Commission. Motion to deny approval of the preliminary plat for the Pinehurst residential subdivision. DECISION TWO Motion to approve the conditional use permit which would allow two 3 -unit townhomes in an R-2 district contingent on the following conditions being met: A revised site plan is submitted indicating the distance between the intersection and the curb cut of any driveway in excess of 40 R, as well as compliance with the 3 -ft setback for driveways from aide property lines. Council Agenda - 6IM5 2. A grading/drainage plan is submitted which indicates drainage patterns and grading necessary to divert surface water run-off away from the townhouse sbucture(s). 3. A landscape plan is submitted which indicates the trees on site being preserved, as well as any additional landscape improvements associated with the townhouse project. 4. The connection of public utilities is found to be acceptable by the City Engineer and appropriate to the City's service capacities. 6. The applicant establishes a Property Owner's Association for �} the primary purpose of maintaining the propert_Ys common spaces. C �P This is the alternative recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. Motion to deny the conditional use permit to allow two 3 -unit townhomes in an R-2 district. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative •1 for both decisions one and two. P_SUPPORTING DATA: Pinnning Commission meeting supplement information. E r�MRY-11-1995 15:19 NAC 612 S95 9857 P. 02/M INA Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. C uRaAM PLAMMIMO.Ola'IOM- MARKET RES&ARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Mondceflo Phumiag Commhdon Jeff O'NeM FROM: Stephen (Asa DATE. 11 May 1995 BE. Mondodb - Phi Townhmm FILE NO: 191.07 - 95.07 The appliram, Mr. Eugme Baner, hu submitted a ptefthary plat to ooaatmct two dum-Unit wwnhonre bufldinp on four exhehog putted lots. The applicant hu teyaeaad a a bdividon appwval, a oothdtdoml use permit to devdop the pramty u a PUD and a vada= for a aide yard scrim& for a ddveaay. lbe p a4m h pt V=d for conhanettca in a man mood of the City and when the Pmdomftma bdlding type h do* faintly home. Attached for reference: Mddbit A - Ptdimiffity Plan 7U pl m; , F I phi of Pindmra condo of two, thm auk oownhoase bufldiog dtas. Each wwnlf0m Would have its otnh pond of lead mmoaodiag the buflft , widh common waW. In addidoth, tkte devalopmmt wootd t—W6 a qmw ownx ft all buflft dta which would be earnmonly owned. The Zoning Ordhmm nequba a ndtdmum of 5,000 sgnm feet of lot an per unlL As paoposed. the Pinehum prcdm would ca ndat of over 7,200 sgtme feet of lot ata per unit. All butldtag and other petlblmaooe curia of the Zaalag Ordinance would be mat by the development, with the ettoeW= of the hon diutuud ipocMcally In the following 5775 Wayzata Blvd - Suite 555 - St Ltwis Park, MN 55416 - (612) 5959836 -Fax. 595-98/3 (p'`7� Conal Use Permit. rx Mt = ails is a¢semtly zoned R-2 and is proposed to remain R-2. YVabm this maing dianiu, mweb omm am &Vowed as a coadidond use provided the requirements d Chapter 20, PUD-, ase met, as well as the admialstmtive coaftotn of Chapter 22. Asa of the coaftoul use permit procm&sre, the Planning Commisslon shall consider the poaable adverse effects of the proposed camel nae, based an the following faccom 1. Rol toMnnldlWC.,..,,....,..j' I Phu. The C.1-,,-.1—Ai Guide Plan recommends that reddeathl areas dame to the Central Busu=s District be mcoasnged for multiple family dweltlttga- 'Ibis policy enables more people to live claw to the retail shopping and services offered by the traditional downtown area. 21e pdiicy of encota &g higber deaaitas in nemby edgWxnhoods also assists in the maiatetisace of a smog retail base in the Downt m Diuril. 2. The geographical area involved. The project site is laared in an eanbUshed odghbofood sun of older a n& family houses, with a few auhi—iemily dwellings om mucted more wady. Thele is a variety of Wilding typo and am =WwcbzW chanaet thrcegbout the naW&whood. For this reason, the geogrtpldcal uea is ooad2dve to this type of houthg dmWpmeet. S. Whether saute m will tmd to or ash depreciate the area In which it Is proposed. There is little reason that the ptvject would be erected to depredate the area. Provided the tywnha-sw are consnuctod with high goality materials and mdubdued in good condition. the oornahooses MAY indeed imp me property vahsa In the ndghbotbood. L The character d the mrmundlog ares. As mendonod weviooaly, the aurrounft oelaft baod concha of older boads►g, reflecting the trsdBiand adimmoship of construction in the caigiml ao cau mdty. The design of the pmposod Uwnhousa shouter be t 9balcalty amd fb cd=Uy aomptihle with the soaotmding residentlal alp. S. The demonsusted rind for such ase. The CorWebcaslm (hside Plan puomoI an Increase In tetWeetW &crier es around the CoM913minm iDistrict. ibo need to provide mszites rate hot-dog to mcc mmodase those who do rot chits a doges hmily home h an tmpmnma Unit in me local housing muket. Mir may lrdl:r to be 4n the mWW migl+batI I of Moadcelb, badlating as etdsting 0 MAY -11-1995 1520 NRC 612 595 9837 P.04/0'7 and fumre need for this type of housing in this area. With regard to the General Requirements and Standards of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), the proposed townhmm deveiopment appears m be consistent with the Comprehensive Pian and Sanitary Sewer Plan for the area. Common open space would be provided primarily by the adstiag public erreers and open spaces of the City, but also by the 24,810 square feet (.57 acre) of land owned m common surrounding the individual townhouse lata. Common open space and service faer7mec require nunagmem and maiotesance by a property owner's association as approved by the City Councll. R will be the tesponsUity of the property owner's association to adhere to the opmadng and maintimance requirements stated in Section 20.2 (E] 3 of the Zoning Ordinaaoe With mgwd t D the specific.. .;'...., ...,, of townhouses in a PUD, Section 20.2 [M], the proposed project meets the nsgn(renhettts of leu than eight (3) dwelling units per single strucune, and a noir hx frontW geeaLer than 20 &a is width. Also, the m>dmam suck and building height criteria establiahnd by Section 20.2 [N] ane also satisf ectomy met. This lamer swdon states the mini baUding , . ,J for the R-2 district apply to a PUD within that district. Vuianer. Drivewa Setbauis According to the General Provisions for Of( Som Paridng, Section 3-5 [D] 9.g., curb cut openings and driveways shall be at a mioimwn three (3) feet fmm the side yard property line In residential districts and five (5) Leet from the side yard lot line in business or lndormal districts. In this case, the driveways of four tadts are adjacent to the side yard lot Itnes of the Individual unit las. A variance has been requested by the aap"unt to accommodate this Com. Variarxes must be evaluated as to the preposei's . c hwdit in complying with the literal te®s of the Ordinance. The Za ft Ordinance describes moh otmditims as being those conditions which anarhrs person devela ft In the same mdng district would not encounter. Adherence to the driveway aaback roquirmcmn for twin homes was required of the River Dail project, and no apparent conditions pre sm themsch= which would onion a unique condition on this property. Mw primary distinakm between these projects would be the etdrzeace of Common area on the Bauer project under consideration. Toe Zoning Ordinance requires a squadon between the driveways either side of the lot line in codes to eliminate the vWW appeanace of a single, contiguous Concrete slab driveway for both double width garages. A bndsapin treatment, or change in paving pamem or materials, would visually improve the front yard appearance of the units. In addition to the hardship finding discussed above, approval of a variance requires the PlandW Commission to mains a finding that the proposal will not: 0 MqY-11-1995 1526 NPC [A] Imps an Ae Supply of light and air to s4acent property. [B] Umasombly increase the p1m in thr- public soeet [C] Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. [D] Unreasonably diminish or impair atabliahed property values within the eeigh- borhood or in any other way be cmuM to the intent of this ordinance. A second wzs-c g condition ensu with the driveway and curb cat of Unit 1. According to the Geoml Provision for 094U xt Puking, Saednn 3-5 (Dl 44, no curb cut oxen dWI be located less than forty (40) fact from the ismer of two fM or mom street fights -of -way- Ibis distance is typically measured Ecom the inners, ' n of lot Nes. In this case, the drivearay for LTa¢ 1 is twenty-five = feet from the it =wcdm of the from and side yard let line, a considaable deviation from the code regatranertt. There are three alternatives to resolve this iswe. The City may simply deny the proposed project, co� a var mm, or approve die psaject conditional upon an apps pdsoe driveway ph cement for Veit 1. if the City chooses to deny the project based on this nato-ccafarming cood'mon, a potentially positive redevelopment iaidawc would be disoomsed. At the same date, it is as in the best interest of the City to approm p Jade which geamte unsafe trafc conditions at the intersection of neighborhood atter. it the City chooses to {tarn the appHeant a vssiaoa, &Bowing for the nab cot to be within 40 feet d the btenectim a troublesane pacedest would be established Future developmem in the manure neighborhoods may areieipate vadances for this type of condition, as well as other nca- onfoming eonditioas. The optimum soluti m would be to approve the proposal conditional upon the driveway befog moved or the unit omffguntion designed such that none of the project's cmb cuts an within 40 feet of the 4th Street and Fpm Stric t intersection. Tb accommodate this eca didon, the will be required to revise the prelimWaty plan showing an appropriate wa8gurad= of the sowohoase mita sad their ddvewM. Beattie tho Caty's Zo*g Ordimne a11ow& for townhoun to be grouped in up to dgW ooadguoas units, all six rests may be sinned to form a single townhouse structure. An even more desimble option, gives the existing ehuw= of the neighbodumd, would be to place the driveway d Urdu 1 em the easoern dde of the WUvidaal lot and acquire another five tars by moving all hrdivAW Iota to the southeast. 'ibis coaflgsa:W= would allow the unlu to :amain essentially mchenged is their oiicnndon towed the street and within the necessary side yard setbado mgWnd by the otdimooe. 1% necessary on champ to accommodate this solution are relatively minor. 'ibaetore. the City could allow the project to proceed with the condition that the final plat hsdicam a orb eau condition & mtes than 40 fact f4om the Elm Suet and 4th Snea itstenu cdort. UtJl ion The proposed site yho should be eeviowad by tt>be City Engineer for evaluation of the existing water ddhwy, sewer system capacity and of new un b to these systems. 0 MAY -11-1995 15:21 NAC 612 595 9837 P.06/07 Final plat approval should be Gt>marotml upon the City Engineer's approval of the project's conaeCt= to wdsting public utgay fiery systmax Gra the appliam will be required m provide a gmdWdtaioege Plan. 'ibis Play should describe an appropriate wading of the site to,—.. -6— ' ,, dtalmp patterns away 'f rum the buildings and toward the mtmdciml am drainage rystem provided within street rights way. Final plat approval shall be conditional upon the City Bags mem approval of the Gtadin&Mrainage Pla& land. the submitted Plan locates existlng trees ori rite acrd their present trunk caliper. Meat' of these utero outside prv1 , ' baUding footprints should be paawnd thtonh the she's development to maia>eia the aatunl forestation of the neighborhood. A Landscape Plan should be submitsed which indicates the excret to which these trees will be preaesved, as well as tow landscaping untmesu Because the project will be developed as a POD, Section 20-2 DQ, Gencral Rapirements and Standards of tho 2Aaing Ordinaaca, stares that a Landscaping Plan be approved by the City Council as a condition of preliminary plat applovaL As stand is the ardiiace. In addressing the Iaodsaplog Mo. the City Council shall consider the natural features of the particular site, the macldtecalml ehamcmdsda of the proposed structures, the ovetali scheme of the PUD Plan, and the general landscaping provisions of this otdinarroe.' Final plat approval shall be cornual upon submission of a iandscgbg Pbsn and its approval by the City Council. Pmtbmd Dedlsadon. The intensity of land use has bmtsed ft= four dwelling units to six on lbur tonally planed residential lots. Be== of this increased imeasity, the City may choose to consider a cash dmmd m towards park load ,........ ..,,..... In lien of land dedication. or other such — �.,r,... -- appropriate to the development's impact on public pads usage. Map= between the applicant and the City should be a documented component of the prohminary plat approval. ALT»lATM ACTIONS: ft-ArInn A, i. Approve a Preliminary Phut Or two, three unit townhouses, known as Y 2. Deny a Preliminary Plat for two, three aft towohousa, known as Ploebu t Approve a Vuiaace to the 3 foot setback .,,..,,...,.,,.,. for driveways f= dde property lines. Dmy a Variance to the 3 fm softcIt rogolmmmts for driveways Sam dde properly lira. S 63 MAY -11-1995 1521 RRC 612 S9S 9817 P. V/07 1. Appmve a Cmtdidoml Use Pamft for be con n wdt m of two, three uit wwnbm a is the plat of Pmehtust. 2. Deny a Comdidonal Use Prrmu for the aoasuucd= of two, throe unit bwnhmm in the phut of Pith. RECON24E hIDATIDN: Bated on the psomdiog revim. aur aBim Bods the proposed pr*ct gay cmuistm with the goals d the Comptehembe Quids Sm and bmdme mcomneWs qpmd of the Pi mb= TWnhame Plelim buy Pfau and Ccoddoml Joe Permit. A varf m to the sdack .. ,;'....,. for ddvearays is remmmended for destbl. The Pha tmd Coudidmd Use Permit are recommended provided the following cooditicm are mat: 1. A revised the plan is submimed indiadng the distamco between the btersecdoa and the cart aha of my d&mway in excess d 40 Sat, os well as ao=liaooe wilb ;be a f„ot setbact for driveways from side propaty Jinn. 2. A gmdieg/duainape plan Is mhmimed which indicates dtaimw psaatts and gmding necessary to divert mr&m water nmaff away Ra® the ton lam suunue(s). 3. A landscape plm is mbmind wbieb isWkatex teuses on doe being plesaved, sa well as any additbOasl lausdape fmprt►veme+� assodtted avftb the townhoaae l�- 4. Ilse cmnaxdon of public udiltles is bund to be acceptible by the City Boglooer and apptnpd m to the City's service ca➢addes. S. The applicant establishes a Propemy 0wmes Aaaoehdoa for the p ftmy pmposo of i the p Waty's onmmoo quer. 6. The applian dediata an amaoat deemed gpropii m to the City towards paddmd 6 0 10TCL P.er A preliminary plat request to subdivide existing platted residential lots into two three -unit townhouse buildings. conditional use permit which would allow two three- -dt townhouse buildings in the R^2 district (single and �• - two family dwelling zone). I Consideration of a variance request to the side yard ' setback requirements for a driveway. Council Agenda - li V9b Cgnsi¢eration of a rgsolution accepting bids and awarding the sale of 88.890.000 in G.O. ima rovement bonds. Series 1998A (RW.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Springsted, Inc., our financial consultant, will be receiving bids on Monday, May 22, at 12:00 noon, on the We of $3,890,000 in G.O. bonds to cover our various improvements we have in progress this year. Mr. Jerry Shannon of Springsted will be present at the meeting with a tabulation of the bidders and will present a recommendation for awarding to the low bidder. As you may recall, the bond sale will cover the six improvement projects the City has begun, including the Meadow Oak pond storm sewer outlet, the Eastwood Knoll residential project, the Southwest Ates utilities extension (Gould Brothers), the Klein Farms improvement project, the Cardinal Hills V Addition project, and the upcoming School Boulevard improvement to Highway 25. It is anticipated that we are going to market at a very favorable time, and we do expect bids to have a favorable interest cost to the City. &--ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: �Lc, 1. Adopt a resolution accepting the bids and awarding the sale of the bonds to the low bidder as recommended by Springsted, Inc. Do not award to the low bidder. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Since there is no reason to believe we will not receive an attractive interest rate and bidders, it is assumed that we will receive a recommendation from Springsted to award to the low bidder. The City really has no other options available other than to sell bonds to finance the $3.9 million worth of improvements we are planning or are already in the process of constructing. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution (may be provided at Council meeting); Copy of official statement for the bond sale. 12 AWARD: NS E. SEVENTH PLACE, iUME 100 i.AINT PAUL, MN SS101-NH 611.211 -MM FA%:612.221.1002 f SPRINGSTED Prd2GC Fb1MW Admwr; $3,880,000 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1995A (BOON ENTRY ONLY) NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. And Associates SALE: May 22, IM Interest 1dIiP • RAW NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. 4.30% 1997 FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. 4.40% 1998 American Bank National Association 4.50% 1999 Peterson Flrwn al Corporation 4,80% 2000 4.70% 2001 4.80% 2002 4.90% 2003 5.00% 2004 5.05% 2005 5.15% 2008 DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED 4.75% 1997.2000 4.80% 2001 4.90% 2002 5.00% 2003.2008 PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC. 4.40% 1997 ABN AMRO SECURITIES (USA) INC. 4.50% 1998 DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INCORPORATED 4.80% 1999 4.70% 2000 4,75% 2001 4.80% 2002 4,90% 2003 5.00% 2004 5.10% 2005 520% 2008 Moody* Rating: A Net Interest Trus Interest Prl;a Cw R4ft— $3,858,880.00 $1,119,735.83 4.9847% $3,880,089.11 $1,137,124.22 5.0482% $3,851,218.50 $1,137,023.50 5.0493% MXT PAUL, MN MINNEAPOLM MN UOOKFIELD. W1 OVEMLAND PAU. KS WASN040TON, OC IOWA MY. 1A (Continued) ewer PAINE%&'EBBER INCORPORATED CRONIN 8 COMPANY, INCORPORATED SMITH BARNEY FIRSTAR BANK MILWAUKEE, NAA FIRSTAR CORPORATION MINNESOTA OPPENHEIMER&CO., INC. GRIFFIN, KUBIK STEPHENS 8 THOMPSON, INC. PIPER JAFFRAY INC. ROBERT W. BAIRD 8 COMPANY, INCORPORATED PARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION Interest Ralpa 4.40% 1997 4.50% 1998 4.60% 1999 4.70% 2000 4.80% 2001 4.90% 2002 5.00% 2003 5.10% 2004 5.20% 2005 5.30% 2008 4.60% 1997-1999 4.70% 2000 4.75% 2001 4.80% 2002 4.90% 2003 5.00% 2004 5.10% 2005 5.20% 2008 4.70% 1997 4.75% 1998.2000 4.80% 2001-2002 4.90% 2003 5.00% 2004 5.10% 2005 5,20% 2008 4.75% 1997.2000 4.80% 2001-2002 4.90% 2003 5.00% 2004 5.10% 2005 5.20% 2008 4.75% 1997.2001 4.90% 2002 5.00% 2003 5.05% 2004 5.15% 2005 5.25% 2008 Net Interest True Interest Prf&e Q*t RgIIL_ $3,858,298.50 $1,145,466.83 5.0784% $3,842,846.30 $1,147,505.70 5.1043% $3,841,523.95 $1,158,321.88 5.1472% $3,641,375.00 $1,158,875.00 5.1490° $3,841,375.00 $1,165,872.50 5.1885% REOFFERING SCHEDULE OF THE PURCHASER 88m ym ym 4.30% 1997 Per 4.40% 1998 Par 4.50% 1988 Par 4.80% 2000 Par 4.70% 2001 Par 4.80% 2002 Pat 4.90% 2003 Par 5.00% 2004 Par 5.05% 2005 Par 515% 2008 Par BBI. 5 92% Avatpa Matiro: 5 81 Years i D MDNTICELLO, MINNESOTA 0.0. IMPROVEMENT BONDS, 1995A POST BALE TAX LEVIES Prepared May 22, 1995 By SPRINOSTED Incorporated Bond Date: 6/ 1/1985 Sale Date: 6/22/1995 Issue Size: $3,890,000 Annual LEVY + 5% special Actual Levy Date Principal Rete Interest Total Levy Assessments Levy Year 2/ 111996 122,093.33 122,083.33 a/ 1/1988 91,570.00 91,570.00 2/ 1/1897 245,000 4.300 91,570.00 339,570.00 650,233.33 877,745 591,850 0 1995 8/ 1/1997 88,302.50 86,302.50 2/ 1/1998 485,000 4.400 86,302.50 571,302.50 657,605.00 690,486 528,142 148,239 1996 a/ 1/1988 75,632.50 78,632.50 2/ 111999 485,000 4.500 75.632.50 560,632.50 636,265.00 068,079 504,441 163,638 1897 6/ 111999 64,720.00 64,720.00 2/ 1/2000 480,000 4.600 64,720.00 544,720.00 609,440.00 639,912 480,740 159,172 1998 S/ 1/2000 53,680.00 53,680.00 2/ 1/2001 480,000 4.700 53,680.00 533,680.00 587,360.00 616,728 457,039 159,689 1999 8/ 1/2001 42,400.00 42,400.00 2/ 1/2002 485,000 4.800 42.400.00 527,400.00 569,800.00 588,290 433,338 164,952 2000 8/ 112002 30,760.00 30,780.00 2/ 1/2003 485,000 4.900 30,760.00 515.760.00 646,520.00 573,846 409,838 164,208 2001 8/ 1/2003 18,877.50 10,877.50 2/ 1/2004 245,000 5.000 18,877.50 263,877.50 282,755.00 296,893 130,538 166,355 2002 8/ 1/2004 12,752.50 12,752.50 2/ 112005 245,000 8.050 12,752.50 257,752.50 270,605.00 284,031 123,438 160,583 2003 8/ 1/2005 6,588.25 6,568.25 2/ 1/2006 255,000 8.150 6,686.25 261,566.25 268,132.50 281,540 116,334 165,206 2004 TOTALS $3,890,000 $1,088,815.83 $4,978,615.83 $4,974,815.83 $5,227,550 $3,775,498 Discount (plus) $31,120.00 Net Interest Cost $1,119,735.83 Uty of Monticello, Minnesota Prepared May 22, 1995 00 Improvement Bonds, Series 1995A By SPRINOSTED Incorporated Filing Collect Year Year 1995 1898 1996 1997 1997 1998 1998 1999 1999 2000 2000 2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 TOTALS PROJECTED ASSESSMENT INCOME 10 Year Assets Over 10 Years Filing Date: 10/15/1995 Interest Principal 0 9.5004 Total ......... ........ 109,237 88,177a 195,414 109,237 63,903 173.140 109,237 58,503 189,040 109,237 490703 158,940 109,237 42,602 151,839 109,237 35,502 144,739 109,237 28,401 137,838 100,237 21,301 130,538 109,237 14,201 123,438 109,234 7,100 116,334 1,092,367 405,693 1,498,080 10 Year Assists Over 7 Years Filing Date: 10/15/1995 Interest Principal 8 8.5001 Total 255,397 141,039b 396,439 255,397 99,605 355,002 255,397 83,004 338,401 255,397 88,403 321,800 255,397 49,903 305,200 255,397 33,202 288,599 255,399 10,601 272,000 1,787,781 489,657 2,277,438 a) Includes interest from filing b) Includes Interest from filing date to 12/31/1989. date to 1213111996. - - - -TOTAL - • - - - Prinoipal Interest Total. am, 834 227,216 591,850 364,634 163,508 528,142 364,834 139,807 604,441 364 , 834 119,106 480,740 364,834 62,405 457,038 384,834 68,704 433,338 384,838 45,002 409,838 109,237 21,301 130,538 109,237 14,201 123,438 108,234 7,100 It6,334 2,950, 148 895,350 3,775,4 98 Council Agenda - 5/22J95 ConsiLleration of pporoval of pon#uct with Buchen Environmental for inflow and infiltration reduction orouram. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As per the Council's direction at the last meeting, the City staff, consisting of Rick Wolfsteller; myself, both building officials, Gary Anderson and Jim Kangas; Bret Weiss; and Matt Theisen met with Craig Anderson of Buchen Environmental to negotiate a contract based upon the proposal. The scope of services was changed slightly from the proposal, and we negotiated a range in the number of service inspections from 300 to 1,600. During the first phase program development, City staff and Buchen will determine a priority for the service inspection program. It is anticipated that we will determine the following data during each inspection: 1. Inspect all private property connections for sump pumps and internally -connected foundation drains. 2. Obtain information as to whether or not there is an abandoned septic tank and/or drain field on the site. 3. Determine from the property owner whether or not a well exists on the site. 4. If a well does exist on the site, make a brief inspection to determine whether or not cross connection conditions could exist between the city water supply and private water supply. Although we have not determined the extent of inspections to be done by the City's building department, we do know that all new construction will be inspected by them, and we will go back in some specific areae and do inspections on recently -constructed homes. In addition, staff and Buchen Environmental will attempt to develop criteria which may be used to limit the number of inspections in a given area. If we have valid reasons for omitting an area and it is reasonable to do so, we will do it. At this point in time, however, it is difficult to say whether that can be accomplished without leaving holes in the program. We have enclosed a copy of the proposed agreement fbr your review. The sums shown in the agreement represent the mid-range of the proposal with the exception of the inspections. The inspections represent the dollar amount shown in the proposal. Since we have expanded the infbrmation to be compiled beyond a simple service sump pump check, and we may be limiting the number of homes, the $42.50 inspection fee was used. If the Council Agenda - 6/22/95 agreement is approved, work will begin on the project on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, so that we may complete as much of the work as possible before the next wet weather season, and hopefully see enough of an effect to change the numbers in our final design of our wastewater treatment plant. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative is to appmve the enclosed agreement with Buchen Environmental Services for an I & I reduction program. 2. The second alternative is not to approve the contract or have further negotiations within the contract. C. tSTAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the staffs recommendation that the City Council approve the agreement as outlined in alternative Il. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of agreement 14 u AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 22nd day of May, 1995, by and between the City of Monticello, Minnesota hereinafter referred to as the 'CLIENT', and SUCHEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., a Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR". RECITALS WHEREAS, , the CLIENT has need for specialized collection system services, hereinafter referred to as the'SEWERAGE SYSTEM% and WHEREAS, CLIENT desires to employ the services of the CONTRACTOR in a Private Property Inflow and Infiltration Investigation Program of the SEWERAGE SYSTEM and the CONTRACTOR desires to perform such services for the compensation set forth hereinafter. NOW THEREFORE, for the mutual consideration set forth hereinafter, the parties hereto agree as follows: EMPLOYMEN_T: CLIENT hires CONTRACTOR to fumish the services hereinafter mentioned at and for the compensation herein provided, and CONTRACTOR accepts said hiring upon said terns and conditions set forth herein. COMPENSATION The CLIENT shall pay CONTRACTOR as compensation for the services to be performed, the sum of: See Attachment A of this contract for project outline and prices payable in monthly installments based on the work completed A late payment charge of 1.5 % of the outstanding balance will be accessed on all balances not received by the CONTRACTOR within 30 days of the invoice date. SCOPE OF SERVICES, CONTRACTOR represents to CLIENT, by the execution of this Agreement, that it is qualified in all respects to perform the services that it herein agrees to perform. CONTRACTOR will perform the following services: See Attachment A of this contract for a complete outline of services to be performed. CONTRACTOR will provide to the CLIENT a complete computerized report of the findings of this investigation and provide the CLIENT with a computer disc of the report on the Access computer program for the Clients use. CLIENTS RESPONSIBILITIES The CLIENT will provide at no cost to the CONTRACTOR assistance in the performance of these services including: 1. Two copies of the City maps showing all properties to be inspected. 2. A complete list of all properties to be inspected with a unique identification number. 3. Access to all information regarding the sewer system including: a. Previous Inflow and Infiltration Studies b. Flow records for the wastewater treatment plant and potable water pumpage. 4. Printing and distribution of each informational packet to affected property owners. 5. Assistance in scheduling public informational meetings and completion of public educational advertising. 8. Review of the proposed changes to the City's Sewer Use Ordinance by the City Attorney. CHANGES IN SERVICES Any change in the SCOPE OF SERVICES made by either party must be mutually agreed to by both parties to determine the increase or decrease in the COMPENSATION. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, both parties agree to the services as stated. CLIENT: CONTRACTOR: BUCHEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC. BY: BY: TITLE: TITLE: DATE: DATE: ATTEST: )&d-lL a ATTACHMENT A PROJECT OUTLINE AND PRICES Program Development - $3,500.00 Lump Sum A Project Administration B. Form Preparation 1 . Inspection Forms 2. Certificates of Compliance 3. Door Hangers 4. Sump Basket Notice Seals C. Review Background Information 1. Review Past Practices of Connecting Homes 2. Contact Former Contractors and Plumbers for Information 3. Review Maps and Prioritize Areas for Inspection with City D. Assist City with Changes to the Sewer Use Ordinance Public Relations and Education Program -$7,000.00 A Schedule and Conduct Public Informational Meetings B. Attend City Council Meetings as Necessary C. Prepare and Institute Advertising Campaign 1. Develop Property Owner Informational Packet a. Explanation of the UI Problem b. Solutions to the Ill Problem c. Explanation of private property problem with letter from Mayor d. Copy of new sewer use ordinance e. Diagrams of proper sump pump installation and landscaping solutions to wet basements 2. Newspaper Advertising a. First Ad with photos d inspectors b. Second Ad with Information on the inspecllon process c. Third Ad with results of inspections d. Fourth Ad summarizing project and thanking citizens e. Develop and place posters at critical locations 3. CAN Advertising - Develop Informational Segment with City Staff D. Training 1. Train City Staff Z. Train local licensed plumbers regarding program 3. Train local hardware store owners regarding program III. Inspections - 300 to 1,600 properties X Inspect All Private Property Connections for Sump Pumps and Internally Connected Foundations Drains and water well usage - $42.50 each B. Administer Inspection Program Appointments - $3,000.00 Lump Sum C. Televise Private Property Service Laterals (if necessary and only after authorization of City) to locate Externally Connected Foundation Drains $100.00 to $125.00 each depending on quantity N. Report - $4,000.00 Lump Sum A. Prepare Computerized Report on all properties with address, account numbers, status regarding compliance/noncompliance and the reason for status B. Maintain the file and provide monthly updates for one year following completion of the initial inspections C. Provide Report on Computer Disc in Access Program Format IL 9E Council Agenda - 61l?/95 10. Consideration of a zMest for additional time to complete drivq"y and parl;inrt lot hardsign - Amu Storms, Glen Posasta. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. Glen Posusta, owner of the Amax Storage facility south of Dundas Road, has requested to be on the agenda to seek an extension from his requirement to complete the driveway and parking hard surfacing requirements that are supposed to be completed by August 1995. To provide a brief background, Mr. Posusta received a conditional use permit in August of 1993 allowing him to start construction of his rental storage buildings on pmperty south of Dundas Rood near Highway 25. Because it was planned to add additional structures to the complex, Mr. Posusta was allowed two years to complete the site paving and curbing related to the project for both the driveway and the parking areas and also additional time to complete the on-site ponding requirements for drainage. The two years will be expiring August 9, 1995. Nfr. Posusta has now constructed three buildings on the property and has partially completed some of the parkingtdriveway areas with hard surfacing, but some areas remain to be completed. I believe the request will be to receive additional time to complete the entrance driveway hard surfacing and possibly the request will include additional time to complete the hard surfhcing between buildings Al and ♦2. At this time, I'm not sure why the hard surfacing cannot be completed between the first and second buildings, and also why there would be a hardship in requiring the driveway area to be hard surfaced, as it should not interfere with any future buildings planned for the complex. Mr. Posusta feels that since he still has future plans on building additional storage buildings, he should be granted additional time to complete the driveway hard surfacing; but We requirement should not interfere with any future complex. From the stafPe standpoint, it has been the past practice of the City to delay final completion of hard surfacing and/or curbing if it appears that fixture expansion plane may require the parking lot to be destroyed. I do not believe this is the case in this situation, as amy driveway or parking areae that remain to be completed will W be in the way of any fixture expansion proposals. From this standpoint, there doesn't appear to be any Justification for continuing to delay the hard surfacing requirement or completion of any on—alto ponding drainage areae that maybe needed. I ly YA:� 1 1. After hearing the request from Mr. Posusts, the Council could grant additional time to complete hard surfacing requirements per We c �> request 2. Council could deny additional time for completing hard surface requirements in that two years have already been allowed, and there is no reason for delaying the improvements any further. C. .9TAj RECOMMENDA=- From what we understand is being requested, any required driveway or parking area hard surfacing between the buildings or at the entrance will not be necessary to be removed if additional buildings are built in the future. Based on this and the fact the developer has had two years already to complete some of the hard surfacing, there doesn't appear to be a reason to continue granting a delay in the requirements. If Mr. Posusta has other information that suggests otherwise, Council will be made aware of it at the meeting Monday night. D. SUPPORTING DATA Copy of 8/8/93 and 822J94 Council minutes discussing two-year time table; Sketch plan of facility indicating areae that need to be hard surfarrced and location of on-site ponding area. Council Minutes - 8/9/93 Consideration of a conditional uqe request to allow commercial storaee contained entirely within a buildine in a B-3 (hiehwav business) zone. Anulicant. Glen Posusta. Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that Glen Posusta requests that the City giant a conditional use permit which would allow development of a commercial storage facility in a &3 Zone. The property is located on the south side of Dundas at the intersection of Dundas and Cedar Street. O'Neill reported that Posusta has acquired additional property to the east of the original site which has allowed him to shift the facility site to the east, which has allowed the future extension of Cedar Street to be aligned at a position approximately 250 ft east of Highway 25. This is the best alignment possible. After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Clint Herbst to approve the conditional use permit allowing commercial storage based on the finding that commercial storage is allowed as a conditional use in the B-3 zone. The mini -storage facility at this location is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Approval of the conditional use permit is contingent on the following: 1. The development must meet city standards with regard to paving, curbing, and landscaping and signage. Due to the fact that the road serving the site is an unimproved dirt road, installation of site paving and curbing may be delayed two years or MLnn Dundas Road is paved, wluchsver occurs anomer. A performance bond in the amount equal to the cost of the curbing and paving is required to guarantee completion of the drive and parking areas. 2. A grading and drainage plan must be prepared by the developer and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 3. The developer/owner must provide the City with a roadway easement as proposed on the approved site plan at a cost not to exceed the market value as negotiated by Rick Wolfateller, lien Maus, and Brad Fyle. In addition, the developer/owner must demonstrate that he has clear title to the property conveyed to the City for roadway purposes. 4. No outside storage or parking of vehicles is allowed under the conditional use permit. Motion carried unanimously. 0 Council Agenda - &=t94 Citizens mmments/ietitions, reouests and complaints; A. Glen Posusta asked why he was not on the agenda for tonight's meeting, as he had requested to be on this agenda to discuss curb cuts on his property. Mayor Fyle explained that follow-up information from Assistant Administrator Jeff O'Neill and a letter written by City Engineer Bret Weiss should have addressed his concerns, but the Council could discuss this further at the end of the meeting. Posusta asked what opinion Council had ager reviewing the information and was informed that approval of the conditional use permit for Ams: Storage was contingent on the grading and drainage plan being preps by the developer and reviewed and approved by. the City Engineer. The City Engineer also noted that the cub cuts installed by Posusta were not allowed, and Posusta agreed to fill in curb cuts. In addition, at the end of the Council meeting, Posusta asked Council who issues the occupancy permit if he M in the curb cute. The City Engineer also noted that the Ama: Storms fiaility does _ have a two-year variance on pavement installation if Council is comfortable leaving the area graded with a gravel surfsce. 11 After discussion. it was the consensus of Council that if Posusta fills in the curb cuts as requested by the City Engineer, occupancy will be permitted, however. the dtwnage problem at the alts mist be talwn - ars of within the two-year time limit _•_-•- 7 Af Cq TMT N9S A/ 0 -r Ccej MA 0 s Le R: �ool Ir v f ZIA Council Agenda - 5/27195 > > . C�gn ideration of adopting policies aovgrnina granting a final 99cuoanev uermdt prior to i1r11 oomoletion of site imnrovements. (J.OJ A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to review the following general policy ideas regarding granting of final occupancy permits for new homes prior to full completion of site improvements. The need for the policy statement stems from problems that the City faces from time to time associated with allowing people to move into homes prior to full completion of site improvements such as site grading, seeding and sodding, driveway improvements, and tree installation. In the recent past, the City has fallen short of its goal of making sure that all improvements are completed prior to allowing occupancy, and on frequent occasions, we have had difficulty in making sure that some of the improvements are completed on a timely basis after occupancy has occurred. The problems that we have faced include incomplete grading plana that have resulted in long-term storm water drainage problems. The Meadow Oak Circle situation is a prime example of a problem created due to failure in making sure all site improvements were done properly prior to final occupancy. Up to now, the City has been granting conditional occupancy permits with a notation that certain improvements are not completed. We have left it up to the mortgage company and builder to establish an escrow fund to assure completion of the improvements. Unfortunately, this level of security has not been sufficient to guarantee proper completion of improvements. Quite frequently, the escrow fund gets released without any inspection by the City, which results in improper completion of grading plans. The most significant reason why it is difficult to got all site improvements at the time of occupancy is duo to weather. Obviously, it is impossible to complete all site grading and install sod and trees, etc., when homes are occupied during winter months. Similarly, during summer months, if it is a particularly wet time of year, certain improvements must wait. The following strategy is suggested as a means to curtail the problem. It will be the City's policy to deny any occupancy permit request until such time that all site improvements are completed with the following exception: M Council Agenda - 5/2n5 EXCEPTION: A. In the event that weather conditions or other unique site conditions out of the control of the builder prohibit completion of site improvements, the City will grant final occupancy under the condition that a cash deposit is made to the City for each incomplete improvement in accordance with the following table. Grading $1,000 minimum deposit Sodding or seeding $ 500 Driveway $ 500 Trees $ 126 Other $ As necessary B. If a builder desires to obtain the final occupancy permit prior to completion of any of the improvements above, he must first demonstrate that they are unique conditions that prohibit him from completing the project prior to final occupancy. If this point can be demonstrated, then the City will grant occupancy if he/she provides the cash as required above. The City will then take the cash and deposit the funds and refund the money only at such time that the work is completed. C. There will also be an additional $50 fee for the reinspection necessary to show that the work was done. This fee will be paid at the time that the deposit is made. Once the reinspection is done, the City will refund the appropriate amount. The City will make one inspection of all the site improvements that are yet to be completed and will refund only the total amount of the deposits. In other words, the Building Inspector will not be inspecting each unfinished improvement item as it is completed. D. It is the intent of the City to retain the funds as an encouragement to the builder to complete the work on a timely basis. It is not the intent under this program to use the fimds to complete the installation of the improvements if they are never completed. If it was our goal to have funds in hand to complete the improvements, then the deposits should be much higher than listed. Motion to adopt the policy as outlined above regarding granting of final occupancy where all site improvements have not been completed. is Council Agenda - &22J95 Under this alternative, City staff would use the general description noted above as the guideline in granting or withholding occupancy permits. Also, this policy would apply to residential developments only. Motion to deny the policy as outlined above. Under this alternative, Council is not satisfied with the policy as noted above and perhaps wishes to take strider measures or finds that the problem is not a serious enough concern to warrant the measures noted. Staff recommends approval of the policy as noted. We have found that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. It is very important that site plans be developed properly in a manner consistent with grading and drainage plans, otherwise we will be faced with long-term drainage problems that are very difficult to overcome once a neighborhood has developed lawns established, trees planted, fences installed, etc. It is our view that requiring a fairly hefty deposit will discourage builders from seeking final occupancy until all site improvements are completed. But at the same time, the deposit is not so great as to become a burden to the developer that seeks occupancy during the winter months. Finally, Paul Waldron has reviewed the policy as proposed and noted that it is similar to policies sucoeacfiilly used by other cities. None. Council Agenda - 5/22.95 12. Conslderatlgn of p resolu#on p<aorovina plans and eoedScatlo}rs for School Boulevard and authorbdng advertisement for Mds. Q.0.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Council is asked to consider approving plane and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the School Boulevard project between Fallon Avenue and Highway 25. As you recall, the grading of School Boulevard between Fallon Avenue and County Road 117 was included with the Mein Fauns improvement project. The plans and specifications under consideration include paving of the road surface between Fallon Avenue and County Road 117 and grading and paving for the section between 117 and Highway 25. Also included in the improvement project are utility extensions to the proposed Monticello Business Center. Attached for your information is a copy of the finance plan associated with the development of the Mein Fauns project and the School Boulevard project. Please note that the numbers provided are estimates only. The costs associated with the Klein Farms development are based on the bide received. The costs associated with the School Boulevard improvements are based on the feasibility study provided some weeks ago by 0SN. Of particular interest to the Council with this project is the plan for tree plantings and the design of the entrance to School Boulevard at Highway 25. Bret Weiss will be providing additional detail regarding these design features at the meeting. Under the plan as proposed, the landscaping on School Boulevard will be installed on an incremental basis as development progresses. The site planning associated with the development of the business area will be required to incorporate the planting scheme designed by Laurie McCroslie, landscape architect for OSM. Tony Emmerich has had input on the design of the landscaping program for School Boulevard and is in agreement that the plan as presented makes sense so long as the landscaping is installed simultaneous to development of businesses and homes on the property. It was his vievv that the likelihood of the plants surviving would be enhanced if installed simultaneous to adjoining developments to assure adequate watering and maintenance. The plans also call for tree planting along School Boulevard. Please note that this portion of the project is not included in the finance plan. 7be cost to plant the trees on School Boulevard east of Fallon Avenue would be drawn from general city fiords. I hope to have an estimate of this cost in time for the meeting on Monday. 20 Council Agenda - 6/27% The development plans also call for extending a section of pathway between Fallon Avenue easterly to the current termination point at the Cardinal Hills crosswalk. This additional pathway section will serve to link the existing pathway to the pathway being extended along School Boulevard. This additional cost is a City expense. Perhaps Council could request that a portion of this coat be paid by the School District and the Cardinal Hills development area. As you recall, the existing pathway was fimded in conjunction with the road improvement funding. The formula for fiuuiing the existing pathway was 40% School District, 40% Cardinal Hills, and 20% City of Monticello. Motion to approve a resolution approving plans and specifications for School Boulevard and authorizing advertisement for bids. Motion to deny adoption of a resolution approving plans and specifications for School Boulevard and authorizing advertisement for bids. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the plane and specifications and supports the effort to plant trecs and install a pathway as noted. D. SUPPORTING DATA Copy of finance plan. KLEIN.AGR: 5/10/95 Pogo 150 EXHIBIT C KLEIN FARIMSCHOOL BOULEVARD FINA14CE PLAN • V :q+� •rw wlc Ir •IIS DW 1•I�rG r.Ir•I oII •" IyIrIrIY oIY •' ow. o. . r�..rw 1I�I G.w r�/rM or o•G• r �•• Il qr as rue rwowlm IG�s... r.11 n'�I•'w rr Gl••P frI..1 •.ww wwrlr�.�. Ia • r w I w I I n o G o r Ir II. � GYD 1rw wr n t 0 I w I . I • Y Y sortr�l.• Ywr•e •lap sorro....n II•b /I.b ]Iwrr I•� � I•rI rrlwl TM IIIwrI �•�9.Io• YS] lq. nleY t11 m- w,ta Ya Iq Ial IY Wm p 0 Mr q] w•Y 0 r mY1 I m D Initl w•r lr•tGYrl blr. 1>?I.C� Imr IIr YI q Wb wYr Mm TM IGb Ir• YIGp' Iilb WYf Iab p 0 YfiI 0 ML'e 0 Yln �b�tr�I II/rAl IIICYr bd p Wr M/r�i�I ]GwlYrwrt Y� @I,IY Y Ilwb Irm p 0 Y]rIY n11M p /IIA p W,IY {1,100 D Wr IIIA/ MIb llpG wc.la. rl.I 11p1 �IG a III]®YY nI nmq/ Yrtllr IYl rn p IIYl.1 IIYJm /III pe Irr1p DIrr�II y�+Tr twww cr1•n rr�Il ur •.rir rr/ p uw.b YwI nu.w] unrr Ys. rs IDIm pluwlr rw� r.r wwrlGr rlwY I I .w Iw � I I o • e I I GIq rrYII IIIc Y p Y !G/v.IWntwYI11MM Yr Ow /IIb Wb rYI YYI n•n I YYI IIIom I•W IIlrw�ri•GwY 111•HYr n••m b IIIO nIn II •le Irr nr10 Ypo Y•FIiI.frY r•YIq •/Mv WOw I Wb Yln Il wr YW YrY YI Ir1•l W Y•G.fW •wYllr.pwl YY Yp wb r1I.. t46i IUYI ww. nl Nr In YI bm rtv•IlrrYq w.I�s� I•: t^l Ilam wom Wam w r.Ilr.lrls•GL. num nb Yne w® wme DII M.I11rwIG O.0nI� IIw Ow Ylb Ilrb Wew Wp0 ]i/M•11r YrrrwDl.rY G 1]•e® 1110® bb WO YYb Wlr rm nIn nt9 IIn mO nn aoe III Onr•MIM•Mr1r. 1['Ir II IIT Iqp 1]p Iw IGIb b r1I11 In •n II•nI Yn• n.n p IIO..w 11•.w n•nl rnM IlY rdl Iw .n ITa .T ( ILC.W VGwG a rob :wYI a IIW nl,wl /Il llr Ir On IIYYp 1101,•w I]eIp ilwpwWlW lb /]w O lG.r 1eI+ rr ora. T•w[wwlD rr•r•WI IlIr 1.11 IYT IMi mem I•n Yl ur.00 ue.w mm MGM YYI u1n1 um Yu pl /•W � � (111GIIW MpGTrI KLEIN.AGR: 5/10/95 Pogo 150 Council Agenda - 5/22/95 3. Cougiftration of anthorl$ina the City Pnq�nger to oreosne a femobility ptudv onyimerovementa to the Highway 25/Oakwood Drive road avatem. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider directing the City Engineer to begin the planning and design process associated with development of roadway improvements in the area of the Highway 25 and Oakwood Drive intersection. As you know, this intersection has become a bottleneck for traffic circulation in the area due to the increase in traffic. According to the transportation plan adopted by the City Council a few years ago, the alignment of this intersection needs to be moved farther to the south in order to accommodate vehicle stacking requirements for vehicles southbound on Highway 25 that turn left to the Chelsea corridor area. On May 12, 1995, City staff met with representatives from the County Highway Department along with representatives from MN/DOT to discuss possible improvements. According to MN/DOT, they have plans for developing a four -lane section between the f eeway bridge and the Oakwood Drive intersection. This small project would be completed sometime in 1998. MN/DOT noted that their plans for the timing and magnitude of their improvement could be adjusted to coordinate with a larger City/County/State project. The Wright County Engineer indicated that the County would be interested in assisting with fhnding a portion of the cost of the construction to realign Oakwood Drive(CSAH 117. It was the consensus of the State, County, and City engineering staff that the City needs to begin the process of acquiring the necessary right-of-way. This process can only be completed after the proper alignment has been identified. Identifying the proper alignment is, of course, a major goal of the proposed study that Council is being asked to authorize. The plan will become the basis for the design of the realignment of the intersection. Once the plan is in place, the City will need to take the next atep fbrward by beginning negotiations with land owners to acquire the land necessary to complete the project. Attached you will find a summary of the scope of work that would be conducted by OSM. 22 Council Agenda - 6122t95 1. Motion to approve a projected expenditure of $18,000 for the purpose of funding a feasibility study on improvements to the Highway 25/ Oakwood Drive road system. This study would include preparing plan work for the entire system on Iiighvvay 25 between School Boulevard and Oakwood Drive. 2. Motion to approve a projected expenditure of $8,000 for the purpose of funding a feasibility study an improvements to the Highway 25/ Oakwood Drive road system. The lower cost option would limit the study to realignment of the Oakwood/Highway 25 intersection. 9. Motion to deny authorization of a feasibility study on improvements to the Highway 26/Oakwood Drive road system. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is our recommendation that Council select alternative Yl or 02. It is the view of City staff that it is important to. at this time, begin the process of identifying the land necessary to enable realignment of the roadways in this area. The City needs to be in position to be able to encumber the land necessary for the alignment prior to development tatting place. The longer we wait to select the alignment, the more it may cost in the long run to acquire land, move businesses, demolish structures, etc. It is our hope that by starting the process now, we will be able to pre-empt f uOer development of sites that are needed for right-of-way. Acquiring land now will, in the long run, reduce the cost of the needed enhancement to our transportation network. Please note also that realignment of this roadway is in the County Transportation Pian and City plan. D, SUPPORTING DATA: Scope of Servide Report from OSM providing detailed review of alternatives 01 and #2. 23 Re: ^Cr�he,,l,s,.e,a,,Road F.t�OIIa' C"�'Y• •-vl� Mondoelkh Dear W. O'NcM-- Endosed is an elated cost to develop concept layer for the extension of Caelsea Road from CR 117 to 90th Street. Including the relocation of the Oakwood Drive Intersection with TH 25. We bare provided estimates of coat for performing a basic concept plan, as well as a mon thorough area concept plan, The first alternative Is to develop a concept looldag at Chelsea Road between CR 117 and 90th Street through TH 2S. The second alternative would include all of alternative one and a concept for T.H. 25 widening from 144 to School Boulevard The purpose of the extension of Chelsea Road from CR 117 to 90th Street is to provide for an acceptable iumsection spacing on, T.H. 25, thus improving its operation. With the increasing amount of traffic on TK 25, congestion at the I-94 ramps Is spreading to the agjaeent intersections. Ma/DOT b very concerned with this operation and bas considered closing the existing Oakwood Drive intersection to left turning vehides. The extension of Chelsea Road from CR 117 to 90th Street would provide an adequate access plan for the edsting businesses on, Oakwood Drive which would be cut o8 from left turning wAlcles. This project has been identified in the Monticello Thsosportation Plan and Wright County Plan as a viable project It is important that this planning process happen now. Development pressure In the area u slowly reducing the viable alterative routes. no longer the City of Monticello wain, the more costly aequWtion costa will become for the property between Ot 117 and 90th Street Mn/DOT has identified a Federal Aid Project for T.H. 23 between I-94 at Oakwood Drive in 1998. WDOT has indicated that this would be a ideal time to complete the construction of TK 2S from I-94 to School Boulevard and Chelsa Road from CR 117 to 90th Street dd f�n COd 8 'B S 'G O�� May 19, 1995 NO � �s6ee•I>Jd,.,,� smclel�ofb, 61N FAX 695.3n4 Mr. Jeff CYNeIII Assistant City Administrator Cit Of MONO 250 P.nat Broadway Monuoell% MN 55362 Re: ^Cr�he,,l,s,.e,a,,Road F.t�OIIa' C"�'Y• •-vl� Mondoelkh Dear W. O'NcM-- Endosed is an elated cost to develop concept layer for the extension of Caelsea Road from CR 117 to 90th Street. Including the relocation of the Oakwood Drive Intersection with TH 25. We bare provided estimates of coat for performing a basic concept plan, as well as a mon thorough area concept plan, The first alternative Is to develop a concept looldag at Chelsea Road between CR 117 and 90th Street through TH 2S. The second alternative would include all of alternative one and a concept for T.H. 25 widening from 144 to School Boulevard The purpose of the extension of Chelsea Road from CR 117 to 90th Street is to provide for an acceptable iumsection spacing on, T.H. 25, thus improving its operation. With the increasing amount of traffic on TK 25, congestion at the I-94 ramps Is spreading to the agjaeent intersections. Ma/DOT b very concerned with this operation and bas considered closing the existing Oakwood Drive intersection to left turning vehides. The extension of Chelsea Road from CR 117 to 90th Street would provide an adequate access plan for the edsting businesses on, Oakwood Drive which would be cut o8 from left turning wAlcles. This project has been identified in the Monticello Thsosportation Plan and Wright County Plan as a viable project It is important that this planning process happen now. Development pressure In the area u slowly reducing the viable alterative routes. no longer the City of Monticello wain, the more costly aequWtion costa will become for the property between Ot 117 and 90th Street Mn/DOT has identified a Federal Aid Project for T.H. 23 between I-94 at Oakwood Drive in 1998. WDOT has indicated that this would be a ideal time to complete the construction of TK 2S from I-94 to School Boulevard and Chelsa Road from CR 117 to 90th Street dd f�n COd 8 'B S 'G O�� Mr. Jeff axe M May 19. 1995 Page The erdraisted coat to develop , m 1, ; t layom for aheraative one, Chelsea7ftoaa esteadon only and develop a dght of way plan6 would be SUM This amt would fns de liaison with Ma/DOT and developing an appropriate acorn location on TR 25. The ascend altmnaft wbdeh would expedite the prompts for Mn/DOT approval of the entire project, would be estimated at 318,000. Taft the lead is the planning proasw wM help em1- P this project for the 1998 construction by Ma/DOT.'ibis on would laebrde the developmem of the m sept layowa, right of way k=4 Mm with Mn/DOT aW takfag the project through the Federal Aid Project selection process. 9 you have aq quesdoas or comtments an this proposal or have any oonmem please do not hesitate to glue me a call at 59546K or Crit Ricim at 595-M. Y. ORR40GE BN-MAYF.RON tit ASSOCIATES, INC Ronald B. Brig. P Maaeger. Tf=vm tadmm Department C John SioWla. O4' of Mewdeello Rick wolbtella. C Irf of Moadcallo k*0�v.. Brat A Wein. P.B. city EWR 910a aoeasv Know save• 1 60 as -et -Off— Council Agenda - 5/22195 14. _Cpn4i&mUon of authorl$ina the Vity Engineer to mmnare a feasibility studv.9n ramp and brldTLjMRr9vement9 at Countv Road 118 and I-94. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As you recall, at the previous special joint meeting, discussion regarding the potential development of a partial & eeway interchange at County Road 118 was discussed in conjunction with development of the outlet mall. During the discussion, it was noted that the County Road 118 improvements to I-94 have been included in the City's plan for upgrades to our transportation system. City Council is asked to consider going ahead and authorizing completion of plan work necessary to obtain approvals from the State of Minnesota and MN/DOT in anticipation of completing the interchange at some point in the future. It is requested that this work be completed at this time in order to reduce the time frame necessary to complete the project. The possibility of Monticello being selected as the location of this facility may depend on how fast the City can coordinate the process of development of the freeway interchange. By starting the preliminary planning work immediately, we can get a jump on the process. At a meeting on May 12, 1995, with County and MN/DOT officials, MN/DOT noted support for development of an interchange at this location; however, no construction fWuling would be provided by the State due to the fact that the primary purpose of the project, according to MN/DOT, is to improve local traffic flow only and to enhance land developability in the area. MN/DOT will also require that the design be established to allow frill interchange at this location; however, the construction of the trill interchange could be phased to occur over a period of years. Please note that according to the outlet mall representatives, the viability of the site depends on development of a trill interchange at this location. Wright County has also looked at the possibility of utilizing state aid funds to assist in funding a portion of the bridge improvement expense. Wayne Fingalson noted that it is a possibility that County funds could help fund this portion of the project. At this time, it is estimated that the project will coat $3.5 million to construct. It is not known what portion would be paid by the County. The interchange design approval process will take about six months and would likely require an environmental assessment worksheet. Attached you will find from OSM a coat estimate and a scope of services and a time line associated with plan development, review, and construction of We bridge improvements. 24 Council Agenda - 5/22/95 In conjunction with the study, staff will be exploring methods to fund construction of the interchange using revenue derived from the outlet mall if possible. A major potential source of funds includes the pooled TIF funds (S3.5 million). The HRA, however, has indicated other priorities for the pooled funds. According to 011ie, the HRA his given direction to distribute pooled funds as follows: • Fallon Avenue overpass • Highway 25/Oakwood Dr. • Land acquisition/blight removal • Wastewater treatment plant expansion Council may wish to discuss use of pooled finds with the HRA if Council priorities for use of the funds are not consistent with the HRA priorities as identified in the table above. Motion to authorize the City Engineer to prepare a feasibility study on ramp and bridge improvements at County Road 118 and I-94. Motion to deny authorization to the City Engineer to prepare a feasibility study. This alternative should be selected if Council would prefer to "wait and see" if the outlet mall selects a Monticello site before authorizing the study. Or perhaps Council is not truly convinced that a full or partial interchange at this location is a good idea or wise investment. COMME As with the Highway 26/Oakwood Drive study, the 1.94 interchange improvements at this location have been included in the city transportation planning for some time. The possibility of the establishment of the outlet mall at this location could be a factor justifying completion of the study at this time. If the City Council is interested in showing a signal that the City wants or desires to be the location of the outlet mall, then it would make sense to authorize completion of the work at this time. Even if the outlet mall does not select Monticello as the site, the work completed will not be wasted because it has always been in the City's plan to complete the interchange improvements at some point in the future. 09M report on scope of services; Excerpt f i om City Transportation Plan. May 19, 1995 Mr. Jeff O'NeM Assistant My Administrator Qty of Monticello 250 East Broadway Mondc" MN 55362 Re. Interchange Access Permit Proposal CR 118 at I-94 Mondeeno. Minnesota Dear Mr. aNeill:- goo Part Puce I= eam4I& ue 612-69--6ne i-NO7a"M FAX 695-9"4 Enclosed is an estimated cost to develop the interchange access permit for a proposed interchange at CR 118 and I44 in Monticello. This improvement would complete the imerchaoge with I-94 at CR 118/CSAR 75. Currently an off ramp 8'om westbound I.94 and as on ramp to eastbound I.94 exists at CSAR 75. This improvement would provide for a westbound on 'ramp at CR 118 and eastbound off ramp (loop) as well as completing the full Interchange at this location in the future. The plan for this interchange has been discussed for magi years, and very seriously discussed over the past two years. The interchange concept has appeared in both the City's Transportation Plan as a Mph priority project and the Wright County Transportation Plan as as Identlded project Meetings were held with the Qty. Mn/DOT and Wright County in May. 1995. to dieoaras this Wm Both Mn/DOT and Wright County encouraged the city to pursue the access permit The nett step in the process is to segue Federsl Highway Adminls=fon O WA) approval for the additional access to I-94. The permit application involves an operational analysis of the interchange ramps and mainline 1.94, and a justification of the rued for the additional access. Following the development of the aeew application, the process will Involve submitting the permit to Mn/DOT for their approval and they in tura will submit the application to FHWA for appmvsL The City will have control u to the schedule in which the taterchup can be developed once the hurehango access permit is approved by FHWA The estimated cost to prepare the application and provide coordination with FHWA and Mn/DOT is $SOX ew CIPMRMM 1. 9 1 0 d OOt■uv "No. AavO0 r 80 go '01 'fl0 r ■ ■ Mr. Jeff O'Nem May 19, 1995 Page 2 This amoaat does not factade the developmetit of ......1 dowmenta aW cannuction plass for this proje m ShmJ a dealupa web as the Outlet Ma be oocsidered for a site in tbh are4 they can be -m ed that ace= to 1.94 can be provided. If you have any questions or cow an this proposal, please do sot bedtato to give in a caU at 395-56K or muck RWmt at 395-M& Ste. CM -S( HMM-MAY®tON A ASSOCXAM INC Ronald B. Biay, PS NuUMM, Tnqmrudm Departmat c John Simcd-, Chy of Mamim to Rik WolfiaeUer, Cfty of Moat TI Bret A. Weise, PS m4' EnSimer ell— J, Li a w I „Wa00 vsvo•1a0 0a at •c0 C�-�` f Tr�por��ion P/an 0 Based on the results of the roadway deficiency analysis, the following roadways would be at or worse than LOS D by the year 2015, if all development occurred as anticipated and no additional roadway improvements were made other than the completion of the CR 118/1-94 interchange. CSAH 75, Washington Street to the 1-94 Westbound OR Ramp: The projected Average Daily Traffic will exceed that of a two lane rural or urban roadway. With the increased Daily Traffic Volume, access to the roadway will become difficult. The intersections of CSAI1 75 at Washington Street, and CSAR 75 at the 1.94 off ramp will be experiencing excessive delays and congestion. Possible Mitigations: • Four lane CSAH 75 from Washington Street to 1.94 off ramp. • Extend the frontage road from Hart Boulevard to the existing frontage road at CSAR 39. • Signalize CSAH 75 at Washington Street • Signalize CSAFI 7S at the 1-94 off ramp. �4 � O OSSI "ed No. 1109.00 Pop 29 "-- IMPROVEMENT OPTION 1 - CR 118/1-94 INTERCHANGE This improvement option would complete the interchange with I.94 at CR 118/CSAR 75. Currently an off ramp from westbound 1.94 and an on ramp to eastbound 1.94 exist. This alternative would provide for a westbound on ramp at CR 118 and an eastbound off ramp (loop). This alternative would also require the realignment of the I-94 North Frontage Road (7th Street), which is one of the programmed roadway improvements discussed previously, to intersect CSAH 75 west of (SAH 39. Figure 11 illustrates the 2015 Average Daily Traffic for this option and the anticipated roadway deficiencies. 0 Based on the results of the roadway deficiency analysis, the following roadways would be at or worse than LOS D by the year 2015, if all development occurred as anticipated and no additional roadway improvements were made other than the completion of the CR 118/1-94 interchange. CSAH 75, Washington Street to the 1-94 Westbound OR Ramp: The projected Average Daily Traffic will exceed that of a two lane rural or urban roadway. With the increased Daily Traffic Volume, access to the roadway will become difficult. The intersections of CSAI1 75 at Washington Street, and CSAR 75 at the 1.94 off ramp will be experiencing excessive delays and congestion. Possible Mitigations: • Four lane CSAH 75 from Washington Street to 1.94 off ramp. • Extend the frontage road from Hart Boulevard to the existing frontage road at CSAR 39. • Signalize CSAH 75 at Washington Street • Signalize CSAFI 7S at the 1-94 off ramp. �4 � O OSSI "ed No. 1109.00 Pop 29 CSAH 75, Elm Street to River Street: This section of CSAJH 75 is projected to be at or just above the typical roadway capacity of a two lane roadway. Delays will begin to occur at the existing merge from four lanes to two lanes. Possible Mitigations: • Four lane CSAH 75, Elm Street to River Street • Signalize CSAR 75 at Elm Street TH 2S, South City limits to Mississlppl Riven By the year 2015, if no improvements were made to TH 25, excessive delays and congestion will occur. This segment of the TH 25 would be operating at LOS D/F The projected Average Daily Traffic will range from 12,000 south of the City to 30,000 at 1-94 to 21,000 at the river. Specific intersections that will be operating at LOS E/F and experiencing delays and congestion are; School Boulevard, Oakwood Drive, 1-94 ramp intersections, 7th Street, 6111 Street, 4th Street and CSAH 75. The addition of the interchange ramps at CR 118/CSAR 75 would provide relief to TH 25 traffic, however, it would only improve the operations at the ramp intersection with 1.94. Possible Mitigations: • Improve the traffic signal timing from Oakwood Drive through River Street. • Widen TH 25 to four lanes with turn lanes between School Boulevard and Oakwood Drive. • Signalize TH 25 as School Boulevard. • Widen Ili 25 to six lanes with turn lanes between 1-94 to CSAH 75 • Signalize TH 25 at 6th Street • Signalize TH 25 at 4th Street • Provide turn lanes on CSAR 75 at T1125. • Construct a Fallon Avenue overpassI D OShl Project No. 5105A 0 CR 118, School Boulevard to CSAH 75: With the projected increase in residential and commercial use south of 1-94, and the construction of the CR 118/CSAH 75 interchange, the CR 118/1-94 crossing will play an important role in the circulation of traffic in and around the City. It will also be used as a 'relief" for the local traffic not wanting to use TH 25. The projected Average Daily Traffic on CR 118 will range from 13,000 to 14,000 by 2015. This will exceed the desirable two lane roadway rapacity. Possible Mitigations: • Widen CR 118 to four lanes between School Boulevard and CSAH 39 Signalize CR 118 at School Boulevard Construct a Fallon Avenue overpass. CSAH 39 (Golf Course Road), 1-94 to Elm Street to CSAH 75: With the projected increase in residential units west of 1-94, this facility will provide the only access to the City and the regional freeway system. The projected Average Daily Traffic on this facility can be handled by a two lane urban roadway. However, the intersections of CSAH 39 at 7th Street, CSAH 39 at Elm Street and CSAR 39 at CSAH 75 will begin to experience delays due to the large number of turning vehicles. Possible Mitigations: Signalize CSAH 39 at 7th Street with the addition of turn lanes • Signalize CSAH 39 at Elm Street with the addition of turn lanes • Signalize CSAH 39 at CSAH 75 with the addition of tum lanes CSAH 73 at 711 2S: With the increase of through traffic and turning traffic on CSAR 75, excessive delays will occur for right and left turning vehicles. The existing left lane will begin to operate as a'defacto' left turn lanes with all through truffic and right turn traffic in the right through lane. Possible Mitigations: • Construct left and right turn lanes on CSAH 75 at 71123. /. I rj OSIN "ed Na 5103.00 Pop 31 j i MONTICELLO fSPORTATION STUDY crrr a WOMICMW t amw coum.YN offsovaMm GV"DN i Q< us AT IN onatcumm 0= AM mun " ►.0 13 Council Agenda - 6/22/95 15. Consideration of annual mowing and landmmue maintenance bids. W.SJ A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Last year the City bid out mowing and landscape maintenance for the Monticello Library, Hi -Way Liquors, and Monticello Fire Hall, on an as - needed basis. In addition, we bid out the mowing of public nuisance property for weeds and tall grass. The mowing for the library, liquor store, and fire hall was on an as -needed basis. The Public Works Department was able to keep up with the mowing at the fire hall and library-, consequently, the only contract mowing the Public Works Department did was for the liquor store. The cost for mowing and weeding at the liquor store for 1994 was $386 based upon the bids from Quality Lawn Maintenance. The public nuisance mowing for 1994 totaled $6,908.25. We have tightened up the specifications for 1996 in regard to weeding at the public works sites. Mowing at these three sites is still on an as -needed basis, however. We have also tightened up the public nuisance mowing in that the contractor now needs to provide better cost control for these mowing services, and each public nuisance mowing will be handled with a separate purchase order. We expect this to reduce the overall cost of public nuisance mowing. For this year, bide were received at 10 a.m. on Thursday, May 18, 1995. We received two bids, one from Carefree Lawn Services (James King, owner) of Monticello and another from Quality Lawn Maintenance (Douglas Stanger, owner) of Enfield. Attached is a tabulation of the bide. Upon reviewing the bids and the fact that the majority of the work in the past and in the near future is for public nuisance mowing, the bid from Quality Lawn Maintenance represents the lowest cost to the City and taxpayers. It should be pointed out, however, that a great deal of the public nuisance moving requires brush mowers bid at $45 per hour Brom Quality Lawn Maintenance and $60 per hour firom Carefree Lawn Services. H. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The first alternative is to award the annual mowing and landscape maintenance contract to Quality Lawn Maintenance based upon their overall low bid. Although we had some problems last year with weeding at the liquor store by this firm, we feel the specifications and our discussions with that firm will correct the problem. The second alternative would be to award the bid to Carefree Lawn Services. 26 Council Agenda - 6122195 3. The third alterative would be not to award contrail this year. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council consider awarding this year's annual mowing and landscape maintenance to Quality Lawn Maintenanoe as outlined in alternative 01. D. SUPPORTING DATA Copy of bids. 27 CITY OF MONTICELLO BID TABUL AT10N MOWING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Yry /B, 6116 f000 a.m. BABE PROPOSAL Yttrlrlrlwof WWI BarrlwsdYtnswdo BREA: UW fCEUOLWV" IMasrtp, wmfrtiq. Wee(*V. Inver 0*496pmd S%oo 130.00 (W am ksv rum. preop - separe0e from rttarrq $15.010 110.00 lOterlde" (per Ens hmp sum 1, - Hodp. bush. virm bsm,itp (per hms) SZ.00 rw dmror Fad —,plats deaup Fd. Werltlrirb tlfposal s" 00 It0.00 (Osr tMs dlrtP atm SM& MF4I'AYL/OIAORB I +I+ IM,Wrq. bi mik wee& Inver pd dhpmM s3000 130.00 II (per Urns nmp son; IMwldd rb plead - +evaram Ram mosrtp $10.00 $10.00 (par mw km atm Hedge, puri. vim bl imnk 0 (per hmr) sz 00 no dmrpa Fal owoote domW Fd. Wx/debrb Aapmd ObM IW.00 (par mw Ir,p am, VIV C: UUWX UO FOE MHL I Mo -v. nTwwv. . am D O144Vmd s30.00 130.00 (Dsr tlrw dmP rum. ILlttwhkbrls plop -- sham tram rttaA $10.00 rm drar0e (par mus ung atm. ,.ied0m, bush, Arts bl.m.. (per hm ) $2500 no drape Fal a m oto dcarnq Fd. Lltuldctx Qspmd s9000 135.00 (Per Urns I/rp atm A00M M1t SUNICEe BY rNE MOL01 MmW rads A ab►9 ulpalab Al W I A. TRACTOR MOWERB: 00• dsd $1150 lz do k*od marc $30.00 I5.• edea s 15 50 I so• daetmappw moo I Idr dttdu $14 .50 _ _ 8. 8aF4WXX4LLE0 MOWERS: 146' dad::2bo 9 so 15r dsalat00o 13000 30'dsri — — — 13000 C. PUSH MOWEAB: $3000 A 0. BRM HW MOWEM: - -�-- $000--- --T —_� T— --� ` ,F�a�hm - - E TRWERS: Gas Weed ssrultw .. $1500 I 190 00 6114, 1 stria - ,s� Council Agenda - 5/2W5 16. Consideration of purchase of a mower for the narks department. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This item was tabled or continued from the May 8, 1995, Council meeting until additional information was known about a possible bucket truck purchase. Since the bucket truck purchase is again on the agenda for consideration, this item is again brought forward. It is an exact copy of the agenda item provided for the May 8 agenda. City Staff would like the Council to consider replacement of a 1985, 650 John Deere Tractor with a 72" belly -mount mower. In addition to mowing services, the 650 John Deere is used in the winter as a light duty snow blower for sidewalk and skating rink maintenance. It is anticipated that the 650 John Deere will be kept in service for winter use and as a back-up mower for summertime. The GSty currently has three heavy duty mowers for park use. The John Deere 850 has been the most troublesome and is on its second complete mower deck as well as other problems. The following is a Get of the three pieces of heavy duty mowing equipment: 1. 1985 850 John Deere Tractor, diesel with 72" belly -mount mower, cab and snow blower. (2,250 hours) 2. 1988 Toro Mower with 23 horsepower diesel engine and froat-mounted 72" mower with rollover protection and canopy. (2,485 hours) 3. 1990 955 John Deere Tractor with 72" belly -mount mower. diesel engine, cab. snow blower and broom. (1,850 hours) The majority of the repairs needed for the John Deere tractors lately have been mower deck and drive system related. Just for 1994 alone, parts for the John Deere's totaled 81,142 while parts for the Toro totalled $117. To obtain prices and general specifications, we took quotes on John Deere equipment as well as Toro equipment. Size wise, the John Deere front -mounted mower, model F935 with a 72" mower at 811,287.20 compares with the Toro, model CH223-D with a 72" side discharge 6-ont-mounted deck at $11,594. The Toro unit which compares more closely with our existing Toro unit, however, is the model GM325-D with a front -mounted 72" shower, this unit sells for $12,488. This unit offers a 25 horsepower 3 cyl. diesel engine, an industrial radiator (which is less likely to plug up with grass), heavy duty automotive type drive axle, single peddle hydrostatic drive, and four link steering. The deck on the Toro unit is extremely heavy duty, with 1-1/4' spindles and tapered roller bearings, reinforced spindle housing with 11 gauge steel docks with heavy duty gear boxes, gauge wheels, and anti -scalp rollers. The Toro GroundsmestWe have Council Agenda - 5/22195 a 2 -year warranty, and staff believes they offer the lowest life cycle total cost and less down time than our experience has been with the John Deere mower deck system. With almost 100 acres in our park inventory system, total life cycle cost is extremely important. In preparation for this purchase, we placed an amount of $15,000 in the budget. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative is to purchase the Toro Groundsmaster front mounted mower, model GM325-D from MTI Distributing Company in Plymouth, Minnesota, for an amount of $12,488 plus sales tax. 2. The second alternative would be to purchase the Toro Groundsmaster, model GM223-D with 72" front -mounted mower deck, from MTI Distributing Company in Plymouth, Minnesota, for $11,584 plus sales tax. This unit is slightly smaller than the current Toro we have. 3. The third alterative would be to purchase the John Deere, model F935 front -mounted mower from Scharber & Sons Equipment of Rogers, Minnesota, for $11,287.20 plus sales tax. 4. The fourth alterative would be to do nothing at this time but to continue using our existing mowing equipment. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Park/Street Superintendent that the City Council authorize the purchase of the Toro Groundsmaster, model GM325-D with a 72" 6ont-mounted mower deck from MTI Distributing Company of Plymouth, Minnesota, in the amount of $12,488 as outlined in alternative Al. It is our opinion that this unit will provide the lowest life cycle cost with the lowest down time of the unite we have looked at. We have several years of direct experience with both types of mower equipment upon which we make our recommendation. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of quotes from MTI Distributing Company and Scharber & Sons. 29 Myl DISTRIBUTING CO. Tuesday. May 02. 1995 Roper Mad* Mm ucelb city of PO Box 1147 Mmtticello, Mn 55362 Over Roger. We are pleased to Wm prim on the following equipment CITY„ZBQBMWESCRIPTION OUO 1 GM 325-0 IM 72 M SO deux Ob* seat, wW 4 post ROPS t,z4ee.00 1 GM 325-0 with 72 in Guardian Recycfer DecK Ob* seal, and 4 post ROPS with earVy :14.337.00 Note Add 8.5% State Select Tax Equipment would be set up. mrd, and deliverod covered w-dw standard a you have any quesftu plane call me at 612-475-22M Ea 228 Sincerely. Don Marsch” an Commercial Sales 149M Twenty-first Avenue NOM - P"*Uth. MlnrMOW 554474855 • Phone (812) 4752200 - Fax (612) 47 Q469-1) SPEC I F I CAT MONS 72" HMOH CAPACITY TRIMMING MOWER MINIMUM DEVIATIONS FROM SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS _ ENGINE 1 Mitsubishi, Model E3D-61TG, 3-cyl., 1 (DIESEL) 4 cycle, 59.7 cu. in. (979 cc) 1 displacement, water cooled diesel 1 engine, 25 hp at 3250 RPM, 3.5 quart 1 oil capacity with replaceable filter, 1 hand primer pump, heavy duty remote 1 mounted air cleaner, and extra large 1 spark arrestor muffler for excellent 1 silencing. 1 RADIATOR Mid -mounted industrial radiator with 1 tube and fin construction; 7 fins per 1 inch. 6 quart capacity. Stamped braes top and bottom tanks. Thermally stable 1 water cooled hydrostatic system 1 regulates operating temperature. 1 FUEL CAPACITY 1 6.2 gallons No. 1 or No. 2 diesel fuel. 1 CONTROLS . 1 Hand operated throttle, PTO, glow plug 1 switch and hydraulic implement lift. 1 1 GAUGES AND ENGINE flour meter, ammeter, water temperature 1 PROTECTION SYSTEMS gauge, high engine temperature ■hut-off,1 and electric fuel gauge. oil pressure 1 warning light and buzzer. Glow plug 1 indicator. 1 ELECTRICAL I 12 Volt, 660 amp, cold cranking perform -1 FEATURES once at 0 degrees F, maintenance free 1 battery. Dash mounted ignition switch, 1 36 amp alternator, 40 amp manual reset 1 circuit breaker. Seat switch, PTO and i traction interlock switches. TRACTION I Variable speed, axial piston hydrostaticl DRIVE transmission mounted on an automotive type axle/rearend, Dene GT20 axle - 1 20.9:1 ratio. Single foot pedal control 1 of forward/reverse ground speed. SAE 1 1OM30 SF -SC engine oil, approx. 5 quart 1 oil capacity. 1 1 ��y J SPEC IFICATIONS CONTINUED: 72" H=GH CAPACITY TRIMMING MOWER MINIMUM DEVIATIONS FROM SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS 1 GROUND SPEED 0-9.5 mph, infinitely variable_ I I CLSARANCE Ground clearance 7.5". I TIRES/WHEELS/ Two rear steering tires 16 x 6_60' I PRESSURES x 8, tubeless ribbed, 4 ply rating. 1 Two front traction drive tires 23 x I 8.50 x 12, tubeless, 4 -ply rating. 1 MAIN PRAMS All welded formed steel reinforced. 1 1 BRAZES Individual 7" x 1.75" drum type wheel I I brakes and perking brakes on front I traction wheels. Dynamic braking I through traction drive. 1 STEERING Hydraulic priority flow power steering. I 1 15" steering wheel. SEAT Deluxe adjustable suspension seat. I IMPLEMENT DRIVE 1-1/8" - 20 splined PTO shaft is driven I by a tight -slack double "A" section, I torque team V -belt. Anti -side load I system proftects the crankshaft output 1 bearings. I IMPLEMENT LIFT 2 1/2" - lift cylinder actuates a T -bar I I AND TRACTION of 2" square tubing with chains for I COUNTER BALANCE implement 1 ift. Two large torsion I springs counterbalance implements for I greater stability and traction. I CERTIFICATION Certified to meet ANSI specifications I I 871.4.1984. and applicable Federal I endState OSHA regulations based I theroon. i WEIGHT 1250 lbs. tractor. I I I I I ��C I S P E C I F I C A T I O N S 72" H I G H C A P A C I T Y T R I M M I N G M O W E Ft MINIMUM DEVIATIONS FROM.. SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS 72" SIDE DISCHARGE CUTTING UNIT TYPE 72" (183 cm) width of cut, three blade, mounted rotary. MOWING RATE Mows up to 3.8 acres/hr. (1.5hectores/hr.) at 5.5 mph (8.9 km/hr) depending on conditions. TRIMMING Deck offset to the right from centerline: ABILITY: 18" (46 cm). Deck trim width from outside of std. traction tire to trim side -Right: 23" (58 cm). Uncut circle right: 15".(38cm); uncut circle w/use of wheel brakes: 0" (Rear discharge trim both sides). HEIGHT OF 1-4" (2.5-10 cm) adjustable front and rear CUT: in .6" (13 mm) increments. CONSTRUCTION 11 gauge steel, 6" (16 cm) deep with 2" (5 cm) step. Reinforced with 3.6" (8.9 cm) x 7 gauge channel. CUTTER DRIVE Isolation mounted PTO driven gearbox with 1.26:1 spiral bevel gears. "B" section belts to spindles. 1.25" (3.2 em) diameter spindle shafts protected by rugged conical housing, turn on two greasable tapered roller bearings. A positive splined connec- tion attaches pulleys to spindle shafts for high torque capacity. BLADES Three 26" long, (63.5 cm) long, .25" (6sm) think, heat treated steel, auction -lift blades. SI ENSIGN Two front and rear easter tires consist of Al CASTER hard rubber and roller bearings. WHadLS Front tires: 10.25" x 3.25" (26 x 8.3 cm). SPECIFICATIONS CONTINUED 70" HIGH CAPACITY TR=MMINCS MOWER MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS DEVIATIONS FR" §PECIFICATIONS I I I I I I I Rear tires: 6.25" x 3" (16 x 7.6 cm) Deck counterbalanced by two torsion springs. ANTI -SCALP One front center anti -scalp roller and FEATURES two rear center anti -scalp rollers. All rollers are two -position adjustable WSIOHT 400 lba. (181 kg) CERTIFICATION All equipment bid must be certified to meet the American National Standard Institute's (ANSI) specifications, 871.4-1984 and applicable Federal and State regulations based thereon. WARRANTY Two years or 1,500 operational hours, whichever comes first. OPTIONS 2 or 4 poet HOPS With Canopy, Cab W/ROPS - 50" 2 Stage Snow Blower, Rotary Broome, (Mechanical or All Hydraulic Drive). Slit Seeder, Wide Tires. Tire Chain. Wheel Weights, Cruise Control 6 Arm Rests DEVIATIONS FR" §PECIFICATIONS I I I I I I I � TORO_ _.300_--�- dsmaste l _Groan : :3s - t ..i . r y.. S• The Proven Performers F,r 20 wars commernal mowing 'rofessionalkhave put i ruundsmaster V 31'Kt Senes :hrriugh n�irous tesL< against time and to rainAnd for `0 years the 3f(J Series continue to :k the preferred ct ,ice among :hese same professionals. They have come to rete on these commercial mowers to handle even the most extreme cutting conditions with unmatched produc❑vm. The pro,en penorme s. Long on ,iunbllity. Tight on :urns. With power to spare. Today the 3W Jeries connnue to ads ance your expectations In measures of reiiabihny. eoiciency and unsurpassed quality or tut lthateser your snuauon ur application, there s a ',roundsmaster to serve your rtmost demands. Power - Packed Service life is optimized with these liquid cooled performers. ngines, either 25 hp—diesel r 45 hp—gas. offer vet plenty of power. The powerful 345 gas version has its power regulated and reserved to effectively increase torque and power while reducing noise and vibration. It also equips a Distributodess Ignition System for increased reliability and less downtime. Fully pressurized lubrication, heavy duty air cleaners, industrial sized radiator and engine protection systems go a long way to enhance engine efficiencies and keep you on the job. And routine servicing is so simple it promotes itself. Designed to open wide with conveniently located. easy-to—reach components. saves you time and fosters proper servicing. Incredible Groundsmasterdesign continues to evolve in response to the specific demands of today's turf professional, even meeting future expectations. Toro undersunds that exacting control, superior traction and a comfortable ride improves operator performance making the job easier, faster and ultimately more profitable_ To that end, there's front wheel drive, rear wheel power steering, single pedal forward/reverse action. a compact wheelbase and individual drum wheel brakes, All for incredible. smooth control and effortless maneuvernl whether trimming close, transport ing nr tr3iI!;O9 , Traction - Plus Traction and stability are the emphasis with extra large turf tread tires and. a counterbalance system that automatically transfers weight between the deck and tractor when performance demands additional traction. For enhanced traction the #Rf 4grAvexcels in tinction where competitive two -wheel differential lock types can't. T overrunning clutch that prevents rear wheel skidding in turns and ensures excellent traction. Operator Comfort Providing Croundsmaster operators with excellent control lessens the fatigue experienced from a long day's ride. And a comfortable operators station with excellent visibility extends to consistent operator perorrnance and productivity. For ultimate comfort. the high back.. foam cushion, Ielu%e suspension seat adjusts to Individual upentors weight and length. Armrests afford relaxed steering plus the steering wheel tilts for individual steering preference. Easy to mount and dismount. the ^1unereJoperator,station rn.\Wes rle�:\ of :qnt «),,m with luated nnke and :nc:um re.Ju Inderen:,^t wheel hakes • rnmise.'ntmi ard'nck together ,•v `m,,,.t^ e\en rnking power. 3'ull Ir.,;r.^e^tan.m panel „ci" ecu\:,,•rear "ur:C., r,1r r, rlo.rrc aJ e^:,re run, -,Funs and \�.\ ;n•reJ,^ :mini, h,r.,Nrator ,c- tcenng •Iti";I: t. Jl:t \ :I?Y'` rr.'dl.,'1\11\' Aid �r' trr,crrvr.t .••r'•F.: mammum 4Y.) Versatile Cutting (toro'sGroundmaster(O'_"Side) or E,ear ws,narge tutttngumts have a reputation for cutting in areas and at speeds that others can't. Durably built with I1 gauge steel construction, heavy duty spindle housings, spline d spindle. tapered roller bearings and welded blade adaptors: these decks are more rugged. require less servicing and last longer. Optimally designed. a deep 6" Wind Tunnel' housing and three 25" blades create superior vacuum action for a smooth. eve n cut. Fine Cut Flail 2760 Named for its high quality of -ut and exceptional striping characteristics. Toro's Fine Cut Flail is a worthy altemative for mowing your formal and semi- formal turf. The 2 760 performs without clumping, not even in heavy wet grass. And. its full width rear discharge further enhances after -cut appearance while it also makes for safer operations. But its versatility may be its greatest advantage. The same mower that delivers you a praiseworthy cut can serve to zalp prior to overseedin g. break up aeration cores or mulch leaves, All without the hassle of changing or adding attachments. Unit Family. li+rerS nn - at no loss of following. Scal; i -ng is virtually zr)u^J speed. eliminated with antiscalp features Fnur ;olid rubber deck caster like oversized antiscalo rollers wheels optimize ground contour and adjustable skins. Ivraht.in t,at.:rv, 4 the Fire • Floating dales move fi eel. to prevent -tvjRu e when striking hard -*r ct,- • Revcrsi` c •t W cvter-Js glade neat + Rutor arJ ,•Ice- .haft,- have Fresaeal e'.'a• reatxtt�. Groundsmaster 300 Series Specifications* (continued) STANDARD Roe.aa Prowcow Souchn Ir 11 Cm). r (7,5 S -r . PgATURES 114 PIP .0700 k"), ww bee W a =W9 nW". TYa d Wary pep mmtiraM. Rarea mm Ft Al FLOTATION CUTTING UNITS (continued) WE7GHT 2 -Pita ROPE 133 Oo. (51 Ygr Campy Kd lop= 4t.. 90 ' SLOE DISCHARGE. MODEL 307221 to 141 kc). amam•e•am "POST ROLL-OVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE WITH SUN ROOF GUARDIANS 72' RECYCLER', FINE CUT FLAIL 2790, FEATURED 72' REAR DISCHARGE. MODEL 30710 MODEL 30719 YODEL AA590 WEIGHT Do* omn to or ngm nem CnmwN. 15' D.O. amort to de ngm tram conn". r n 9 RU odea m or rpm nom OPT,OND (46 Cm). Deck Inn -1, ham asm. a Cm). Deck Mwcm atm aaab a SWCWC fnM: 4 s' (11 crn). Tnn TF4MMMO .urga.a nacwn are b am m P" - rlg 27 m to 0-aW - Va. 2r (56 an). Uma .Del tmm a m of smnum ABILITY (35 crn). Uncal ante - n9M 15 (35 an). crct. Iqm: 24.(91 en). Unna oce w1m uw m m rgrw ado: Ir 130 an). Uncal uw ..m lora d .H1eN Iwaaw: 7. of wt1" brake!: 7. G-dwn 77 A -VM, m Uncaei al VU orae 25' ne (P.a 0e0" hbm .M). vnr de tom w. No 171 an). Fled 27M ons on b0m fKN& 5 . 10 M) eglnLLma horn Arc m u n (2hor 3-5 IS t • 12.7 and . fna Wor m 0.4' (0 • 10 cm) agmtre .5.(13 mm) ccrwnina w aptnn on Or n 5'03-)ilm mm waw m.am on or fcmWr.aN T(13-) HEIGHT OP CUT niter vWm G wm. r (5 and h.qm at as no ilcwnwa .m1 sperm on mcmlmmnd.0 union wr.m ct®q oe ham crow oWb am tyro axcmar. Dom on er mar mow. Yodel 30722: 1190.25 awl, r (15 an) t2 9WOa awl. S.5' It. cml G.e0. .ablO 10 ge p. a w l -r 7 CM wmr r (5 an) pep. Rwftreed wtm 3.5• c w mxocn mvwcad.m 10 oti uge gra sm. woma CONSTRUCTION 15 9 and . 7 9Nge SWIM.ow w W own coroalKbm revftmw we% 10 Yodel 30710 1, 951.95 w",4.(10 an) ga, p. cha tela W am. w.D rbldwlg. Rw" w035- .7 ganw annul NOW"" now= PTO ditw plabw w.m lealmn mound PTO ammn ova= eat PTO d b 1:1 r"o b" 125 1 1" Daw gem. -Sr R.. utmon 1.29.1 epea Doral gen Sige 1W NaW ge.ma.. Tea 3V micum DULL MILL t0 OnOw 1.25 (3.2 ant dwnnw hew DNI b Mn=$ S412ft rrq 45N Wm . Sed-tNLLWrr1g 4%10 e' ' Dorm. o"c"d W119 cw.ta Dud". 123' (3.2 on) Ooew reson1W CmI *ewer rmn PA". CUTTER DRIVE iia"" Ibrlq. W. on I..o paaauae m Ymm. awn on two pruwDle ted.md moor 1.25'(3,2 0n) araerWW mew YOend mita mnal(P 19reataaDW p•n WO bump (p.aaeui "n, ma a dock). A than hw on 9mmeem Dee of aWklA Ootam.Oal.d ConeCOon pOaOr. 51.1 co.rmm anachm PL" Deamge aware PAM to ap.rme wm Lor No br0ue away' to soft% mitt to ngn 0MA!mean, BLADES rtw" 2519/ -1 Wrp, 23.15 nnn 1h k. Three 25"(64 Ohl Who. 35 (e mm1 mu. 1 u naa.o.Npa tree o.'oorq Ma4rema Vett. euttowyn Mm-tr.aw cow. RK7or buten Mar" mLLnq O 2300 M.. Two tram arc mr Cmm tom amm of hara %=or W mew beamga Dau cantorooNteoo Two 1o• . 3 25.125 . 6 3 cm) SUSPENSION A A nwo ionwon 4ora•Oe. Opb-M Pramnam MRM A Tu. Amamay haw nam mob. Coram CASTER P N 12.1309. ltm ro*ea01, w"" wm mean Oumpf WHEELSFraw TO" Reor Thee FW cpwmMcWcec M two Yodeta 30722630710 1000•.335 •23. e.3 M) 525 .700'115. 70 ani tondo eo.ga.w.cm mer Mo" 30715 10.07. 3.25 .25 . 0.3 and 507. iso -120 . S3. row Yacht 30710: One hom Con" 4004c p MU -SCM "1*Qud M pito Woo. Thep AM-eCabw aw60MM on AMr,SCALP mea W Ion aro � 043 model 30772: arm -Kap Mem. AQA=M akdl cam N0. a una. w .cm FEATURES on. Imo comp aha t.o ma mow ono -Deft 6w at mann wen"be Mae am RN 0.0. 1 • (2.5 Cm) oee•nge "m..m ere 2ooanon aapaLLbb. DECK COVERS OwCh-M*43. tarn No ma4 rem/. W Ourcl "WM. no VW pf-cows, No Boew Coram. tumor., bite mlllw w 0 rnelpra WEIDNT Yoaa 3022.4m b Ital 1gl 405 m. (211 kW 470 p. (213 kg) wic" 30710 415 W 1185 k0 GROUNOSMASTER ACCESSORIES 2-0OST ROLL-OVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE (POPS) STANDARD Roe.aa Prowcow Souchn Ir 11 Cm). r (7,5 S -r . PgATURES 114 PIP .0700 k"), ww bee W a =W9 nW". TYa d Wary pep mmtiraM. Rarea mm erwn WE7GHT 2 -Pita ROPE 133 Oo. (51 Ygr Campy Kd lop= 4t.. 90 mwozo 1. Stang ow Rae, o" No u wou" mer to 141 kc). amam•e•am "POST ROLL-OVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE WITH SUN ROOF STANDARD Roa� PMWt-SUUMOV ."1 ben and G0V-q FEATURED eya Out ma wit 1.126 and 8MOM tl ma nauatbn ftm, aaww nrnwm W now owpw WEIGHT _23000, 1113 a Apt. orpp+q r4up4 OPTIONS I .w UqN K.1 Ra Mu 00 Rmhn9 PROM GK'.r� OPT,OND I.re hon are one mn w•awn0 %". hq mwmftw 40" 022 cm) SNOW BLOWER. MODEL "910 ..g.m W UWpne. o" m a cm W t.wdh ww J CAB WITH POPS Aoa a P.011ta.0 swc um..W Deo Am moact" STANDARD nW". TYa d Wary pep mmtiraM. Rarea mm FEATURES 0*1 +.11loutq none V 12 5 On1 aCMADW ma mwozo 1. Stang ow Rae, o" No u wou" mer Pena, "" daY Dec, mat. r1Am amt. -own aro hWO VAMW ELECTRICAL T.o hsvmwa3 one roar w Wuv ". Eoc,ep aim, PEATURE5 0.4eo1, mlroan 4...etnb.0a. ewrg Eta mems ane togpe e.waea ._ _ .. . WEIGHT Mo m3 1263 ho OPTIONS "Z, Rea! L ON 101 1rc Carb..ODen ftg W 4w1a eaVta tgnm. cmw= mpwrop Rom- W wug 40" 022 cm) SNOW BLOWER. MODEL "910 STANDARD Y' 1127 trw) Itmge .lal.eAbteoe wit I111pi" PEATURE9 OmcwW iter MMM. momcaI1H batt ma aerator a Mal, 160 WEIONT 400 Mo 110110 --e' _ - J Groundsmaster' 300 Series Specifications* 1 (GROUNDSWASTER 325-0.2 WHEEL DRIVE-DIES'. GROUNOSMASTEFI 345, 2 WHEEL DRIVE -GAS, MODEL 30789 GROUNDSMASTER 325-0, 4 WHEEL DRIVE - DIESEL MODEL 30795 F yp a CyW1pe., 4 yd;-"Ad* "e . Ad* lavkatal coded 9U eriprM aU -meft 3 Cytann. 4 -CM. vamol -MMOW vMN. k0..a CpO.e n.m canpduga WMr pinta Pam .9-nap W 45 m 133 6 km'date oWo wan C.maugal . r pup. 25 1q (16.6 kW) 6 2650 gpv.me0 n a mumun �pm p 3250 ran 57 W n 11100 W rpm raao. gp a^1ea M a ma..nun .ONO of 3250 M-. asauetlwn. Oacun.torMe..pvmn ayw m, span u mato a av a 59 7 a. n 1979 CCI asplm..+Mn. ThN sort erre qb. pugs 12 01$ $060 amn eMCrOr.c rmaY. 3.5 Clan 13.3 bW1 a CapaOh• von 12.0 kWl9p mmw M RaW I aawho a Forced kaa.Cacm EWGINE rovusave a1 Muer ReOlNaaaM ko Ica. Forged w ecu tp rG4, w naW MOM 3S Wan (3.3 kan al OpacVr. m0wue e 0 cls a cY+rmu n.ad am dock. MaC7r mal tvel pump naavl' 014Y aw. Forged Cpnn. u rods. CM cyaren Meed was blaCk Fla le-PM rrva/11ea Y C.- SOMA -crsmr rmr@n M U.41xd wqv O Q w 12.M eMCa1t MvM punD ..0. eMcac Ova pump Rap1aCNMa foal UWAMMW aeperaa.M 3 mem ftft e : bmOm don b vvner rw ". oft" may. nonce mwud ar 0.ann Spot anew mre m a swmm FUEL umory e 5 ypaa 124 6 benl u0aa0ed gnW.- - _ - -- - 6 5 gal" (24 6 ken). No. I a 2 0-0 NO. OWMLS Mamc41ae0 M.M. mwe PTO.;;Wa -VM kh am Wromar w arose. PTO. mwa w rrvw wl q and --_ tow-OD-Ma usam ped" Ipd.00R2N wam P.=. OAUDES a Amasser. row mea. tun pxw mi.. l.rtlpQrabfe tWM.¢ige Amnwl`. as meet, tuW gaup copra wmemura M.vcn-�npa DaA6wOSTICS lcrev.rld oven e"j. m Peaave werrsq torp aro pupm wmm awm.aaag5. ae pm m em-4 we ar10 bulilr gas. Pk+9 euglrl0icm :2 wa 350ary. 370 arra. Cas crw.ng p.aumance &10 F 1-16 CI me Wce hoe 12.41 badny. 630 amp. cola cr&*^ ELECTRICAL Cam mw4e0.pv o excel. 55 amp amrna)ar. Sea. PTO am CenprtMarce al 0'F (•18 Ci Dann rrealUd 1g -, ae4an 35 arro RATURES aarnm wlabck P.ar7Me aurnso. a amp menial .esM prpal W W m Sow. PTD MO axe m.V.Wck PACK" KEIONT Aamrm 1.300 the 1590 kg) ary w69M. MOM 307M* APM, 1.250 aM (557 kg) dry "gM. MOW 30M ^OWN 1.665 M. (755 kg) dY welpa: s Ouws POPS SPECIRCATIONS COMMON TO GROUNDSM46TER 300 SERIES PAW MOVERS RADIATOR L1.0•marll r.WMW raaanr van We aream ca SMOm: 7lem Per nm AM-0 wan (I.7kW) Cepawy. 6tarrne0 lm wa baftm tru nrm "W We CM01 n *N Ure, TnarrNSy atabb am COOMd A/d 9MbC "W npliINS OWAM g nmWAU", (20- Ntlmadyr Vann" speed, ane Dww ft"w1•C mm VarwrYsnn: aw" prcw nywaAU aah 25 m umm pane Myanan now Car awl` ero mnMnrent IA. TrpnMnaporl made to arwe a+M. 20 9.1 reema , appy, 5 Wed 14.7 bW od I OMM COMWy Sa1ya bbl ped. caool TRACTION DRIVE W tpnrerbroverM p a4m.0oDarM1 Eealror.c Cruse Cam01 W4, MoOM ]0677. waeN. ' MaMI 30796: Red sae a movwxatry amen nem nee ane ay a ww%,,,W ww M w..w'ar I pverM/Iry g o" Ww%MI a nW bro ema g n t" em maraa.n lumrq raOUF ^=m 1 9 W A 11 a kna gen wrewl esamm IMPLEV" DRIVE 1.1.1' (2.9 =1 ep.Md PTO SW ancon q a agM•ataa OprMa'A' sect was to" V-0N. M -wo, bed eyaan pmocmi 0M MID LIFT e.wkvwft euq.a Doengs ufl c7We0r 2 5' . 3.25' (6 4 . 6.3 ani animus a T.aa a r (6 ml aquam smxwM Deng rlal corl er.em aaumq Mena IM aaplenMn kh. Taro wP Wrcnn amp COUYrOaaca r%Rxne ae to pUw mbegV em Irwagn WypaukC ateaeq sal mNla vaM aro menmg rr aDw U emorrq vee rI eg STEERING a 15We.a raw" meW V.le a gunman T 33 Miwh IkYicapn I T 137 and OarrMler Wnmg .noel TY1 aOarvq ane w6i a 15 rare. M ffl Away rawm .nal mow m bF Sm bo wv c m mwemen rouUn eras dam h a e..gM war norma GROILM S EED/ M 5 man (o- 15,3 WAI. rt-W mmM CUARANCS Frog Woum CMSM e of 7.5'119 cm ). MOW 30786 over groan a msurca of 41' it l mi Two hon WoCban Mme an - 23. 8.5612 WDOWea ameamm dam. 40y Mrq Derronatae 0= COraW term TtR a"WEELBI Two ran 9100mg a= - V400 30701=88: 16 . 6 508. %AXO M. rebW IM 40y r6vq Mme 30795.16. 6.604, %6010. extra PRMWRE . 10 50.12 U01M."rp. Pert NO aecO "am 4yy meq Tn pnnurae. 21 pat 1145 kPol. OPWIM sen woe we Aro re11 b rM 020 62.7: (ria appNmbM.+tarl imam; eueng.ow .00 30710). R&M FRAME WaMOa Canmi'bm MW WdWW veal quare and r CWCW %M q BRAKES ba&sa" 7' . 1.75' (17 64 4 4 Cm) dean MW a "arp a P" arexas m bore recta WwMp. Oyrame el0kaq Ra up1 me tan GIM OEAT Op rad. Kg oda. vAhm MNL MOOd MM. a 440 00Gt101e s mperlwn seal. Mom W772. (SNI Aaepta IOL Modal 307M .apum wet 307721. STORA W To=, w 490 dorso Caw MAW a prep OP WIV meow BW*p tut koft~ w aaach wa a @W a0rtra. COMOARtMEM WMAMV Twp pan ar 1500 ape =ft hokim. va thwo, carmni krm. PAW tD dM appepNn OnoWmaZap 300 Saw OpOgmw umxw W b W pain CEG7T F"TTOII GfCuM arM aW 300 Op PM r CPM Was MMN Wbmg urea en CMO N n nw1 eq Anw.Cpn Nab" S7WONNI 14VAp'a (ANSI) LDOCkeemns, en 4.1980 am ameCaaM Fo=rW M.a SUM@ mWabaM baae0 roam. FULL FLOTATION CUBTiNO UNITS DE 6ISCNAR64 YODEL 10 pUAROMO 72• RECYCLER', PWS CUT FLAG. 2780, 72• REAR DISCHARGE. MODEL 30710 MODEL 30718 MODEL "500 7� WI10]C+n)+..GOAa Mera b40� t" ♦ 7r00]Cm)wMMw exesscot trq+ 00'OUC.Irillma4l"Lw- may TVP4 mp01O0 teary S4e w rel`X90- mciared RUry-Rac- cepamy era. ro_ a 2300 tort spa rmre.ed Red Rear roepuwr. OnWry'e Oecnergs . MCPTMaO RATe �IAOM up n ] 0 cisco.1, 6.vp0MObTr1 M 6 5 mm II 0.r1.Wri Mpwig I M M OCOP00 t m Moe% up o 2 1 bCM ft II 25 hKW.w rel O --'ao.carl`.ao.sawq. rcr-+ corm-7n 60 ma a R wq.wua asst. Mme`® DISTRIBUTING CO. Tuesday, May 02, 1895 Roger Mack Mcrrttoello city c1 PO Box 1147 Mont[Wlo, Mn 55382 Dear Roger: We are Pleased to quote prices on the 4o6owirg eq dpmer%L OTY�T DESCRIPTION QUOTE 1 GaA with 72 in side dfisr3rmge dedKdbc seal ROPS withPy Q:LS84-00' � Note Add 8.5% State Sales Tax EWoywd would be set up, servieed, and delivered covered under standard merudacbaes warranty If you have any questions pleats cal me at 612-475-2200 Erd 228 Strtomety, Don Mars&drm Commercial Sales 14800 TVMnly-W Avenue NOM • Plymouth, Minnesota'534474855 • Phone (612) 4752200 • Fax (612) 47F54MI L ,3roundsmLastcr 200 Serics Groundsm¢ster?X-D 2-4heelDrk,ir with 62" Side Discharge Deck Grotordw=ter 223-D 4-10zeel Doi e with Gumdran �62"Recydera Power of Choice .rerfuI r. rn ods er teams res a r�1 � e 23 h �r(inuer:.Ia otsM Litt, engine. The Groundsmaster 224 with its 24 hp :Mitsubishi gas engine pro- vides you with the durability diesels are known for. but with more )wer. Both give you all the speed id power needed for the most . emanding jobs. Operator Comfort Groundsmaster 200 Series tractors combine convenient control features with an incredibly comfortable operator station to positively influence a tireless. productive operator performance. A high back seat with optional armrests and deluxe suspension ensures a smooth ride all day long. The mid -mount radiator draws air intake behind the operator serving to keep his or her environment cooler. Easy to see instrumentation. easy to reach controls and a relaxed igle pedal operation of forward d reverse speeds contribute to .ugh productivity. Special standard features of these liquid cooled performers include a high temperature shut down protection system. a low oil engine light and buzzer. a hea.y-duty remote mounted air cleaner and a mid -mount industrial radiator— for the durability and long lived performance Groundsmasters are known for. Growtdsr =ter 224 with .i2"Side Dischage Deck Standard 23" tires provide a fast transport speed. a smooth ride. better curb climbing and more traction -assist with accessory use. Super wide tires with 10.5" tread are optionally available for even more Flotation and side hill stability. Groundsmaster® 200 Series Specifications'` W( 1NOSYA!tEA m•O PRWE MOVER_ i1�6EL�I f.ROlp103YA8TER ZO FRWe MOVER _DIESEL OAOt1NOSMASTER 321 PRWE MOVER _OAS ' A WnEL DRIVE. YODEL 70343 [110 011 3= 221 I Mit 3.0 Moen 13E-6lM 3 CVWCW. at.M. A C/Pa. WA=OLt 3 CYbba. 4 CWW IOW CMN L -no had I ba.W -'w a.wal anDm, 23 hP (173 MVI: 9D•tr•wa m • vaN1.. Dry a aRpb .a o4a I � VW Dear 24 Ip (18 marrmAn road n 3200 mm• 56.09 Cc n 1932 CCI kW); 97.4^•0 to 9 mOri sand d 320D rpmt 6.3 0a n 00p1aC4n0a. F*md aran7mbm by 91W p.1r11p (W8 W Os06rawC FOcw W=m Py QOM PArp• MOdMrgl cmvtugO19mM.gr. 12.011(1.11LAV), 6octm 11bchbxw OD.Mrp. 12 b (1.6 k%M Omc c ENOME MwmaW") Awl OLM r91 tepaaaMe Geer. 3rOMM4") A/ PuOp rn moUcuW Ydim mlr. 12 IN ROpftCa901a hm hu A aw aepalaw m 7 mw1 (1.6 AMI aamr. H" OAV W W ma.bd a ft r . 1�0aort 12.00.6 NVA 9Mr . Wad 0111'r411aN Sanofidtater. ToW w Manan pawn. Nila1wpab1116 ntrur0w M *4 . spn 011 mer. No +am ~-Mm 6 wtdt ( bW2t SPa10 AnMW SiCrMM1 PM a1r1DMMa0 PU4P w om (OPaOMt SpM1. Artaap 75-601 Sown. PfN ?5-688D.) FUEL CAPACITY 16S 90. (322 Mon. OWO NO. 63 9M (32.2 UK u1wa0a0 9Aa0An9. GAUGES A ENGOIS I NOur mw. 114191.100. Nov.= gnat.. A 106 rartvq ww awr. ft* R.9., tallwruae 91190. 3 Ogm-. rp PROTECTON dww ". a9 gx � , -uw wrpwwn - amw ane dus1499uGa: 01 POo.aR amr WT0M 6 am Imps. 1.101 SYSTEMS Od. P4 my rata/ mmww a 004- w&twwPerwn 0t14Drn RADUTVR Ia0•n10Am.1a11v.m 1amalDr eLIMTG1on. 7 tr0 P4 rldt Appr0a.loon (57 trh fJpapry. RamOI mmmnm 1 aft (.95 I Mt4 0roalpm WOO NWCS= U410 po>t>mmPn rat 109000 P9= centra dtR-CW ao WDW4 9000125 11. Nplwocttft bw ACs wn" M rwarwa. I0r hrmletIIbe Mwft W 4w tU.w9 M pow dePrrq w U .tlM.1100901, lorlr4fbl eDOcaT' e TRACTION ORIVE aw1M (5 7 ebnl. ModM 2DSU: Rw 0W O ^uD10.eaM ~ t m MM arch by 0 uwMW wR M Mt-tlMtOa owns" 0.0 promb r am 1P96Y19 in 0mm 4d mmawto my mate. rorro 0 n 2-~ mw mom ApprPt. 1.9 0.wn 01 aer) 9w kAbr m Cepam. GROUND SPEW 0.10m0Ate 1 WMV). dMMYvarms. CLEARANCE FIM 01 m 0Mnr1c0: r (15 2 Cal Mewl 3MM rwr O•Ad c2m d A r (I1 on;. MAW FRAME N v m mnlw atowl. TOM& WNEELBI Tro 4090 ncom M on - 23. 83.12 wen aarr10wumm rOnP. PRESSURE Tr0 m Own9 Woo: M0ON0 3=Y=24 -16. 6.W4 ModW X243 -18. JSO.. N bw m Woo= w Ayp raw. Rtcmrmw 16OrPbvO:20p3.(1361.Pa). OPmW WWI Tim w1Yn. 23.10,3.12. P41 NP. 62.7026. BRAKES Vnwdrl r . 1 77' ( 171 ren a a A m) d.An"whW erraa Dnp aM wV MmM On f M ncml WftM. OWm prMmq era.l9n n cbm awe. STEERING NTOMLOC 0O Caput 17 (33 Pal amamp w40 IMPLEMENT WINE VMS = MWwW 003.111 PTO OW chaMW a a Mmumu-00 W Goom YteM PTO 119'900.11 M atowc cumblala Cawact w m +npwM a wen a raft w Pa and tNlnwq Cron asp " [IMPLEMENT UPT Twn "abide cyw0 am N N w CONTROLS F= -C tW naa Pw Wako peaM NanuCOMat00 71100. CrW PTO vaom Pr 4199, Nam mm arViOaaN Wt 3.•M. M1 94m9Wem, [11110199 30223 010 302113 nave Por 019 aw.eb1910 nP atr1a1 ELeCTNCAI12 Vae n wmn&Aw Mb tM"M w0 630 oda 011909'0 ar1o9 M T r (.16' Cl. 65 0tr1tA0 n00rt. 910130 aT BO f 127' CI FEATURES AO Mro Manlamr.ldl I C. m911am0mCAw SCM mm Pro M1d MD. IWW C.Mm E=v == tylia WIW. SOUND LEM 90®(A) a". 0'm W wldr ro aporpb9 Ob1011bm;./vary Cptlgr00.rdaq wom-a CEATTFICATK)NCww w deal M mAffoca 1 Nataw Swdtm.lmwol ") glloAmblrLL 371.419904m 0pptnp9e Fl" erd I SLUG ngnam0 wow a1MO0n. WARRANTY Trp pw blww.an0dr. ROW to to mOMMa4 GlalamxmW0r IM Bonn OWQWea Mamm fM ~ daft. •bdCae\ � enrP'.AMO b 0'.P arW MGC. 'tbrry' rw1 M &CIO. Q CYC.T GUARSO Or R[C:TG[Rs 1a (117 Pm) IWM m Cut 3 -CM& Dahl 100960 rotary. RM,Tdrp mp98MF .n111 ro emr96. 113.3. 0 10 314,006.(1.. NmumY 1h r U man (011 ar11a1) Dem a11an1 WM Wwn c eler &a,r(S cm= b" -m ow *AMC a'C6 &mama mmmm -M. 17(17dn) Low Crop A"Er(56ap U.DA ace .046 of w" C.111N: O TdN aw boo edw. , x AV i -WL FULL FLOTATION CURING llJTETB K M�0061 30e63� 1r RUR W1CIIAROA w OIOE WSCNAROA T! RDS OMCNARM ' MODEL 363RD MODEL XW MODEL 3NM Sr 1132 PnI web' Of PA ST11570n1wt@'OICw. 7---(19)Cm).00l C.A TYPE 1 3-Wft MN ~400 3-0001. 3.0911 mOA9W 343" e0n1,mmW mtaf, roMY• MW Cabo m2laapMa Mbra.0 to 3 A 707a Wu 0tP 40anaft(16 NOWWO RATE" 11.1 =W=2•MMO8"A (1 A w L0MW%101619011 rKXWW rl M11NO"(09 119 k"ll. (99 tna1rt I0.M0 ' 001 cow 1mw m=m at Gad dhrel nam OueAm d Ow 11301 11em umm d M100I 11 W Ma1P0. ..1aM ID Iw Pa. Ri 10' .01WOb110w3.m: 1C TY TRmAOR)10.25•/29 anI IAC3d ocx 4111 M)LIMS CMM kW gas 04 U -0A am M* 1! 4R. 29'le9 Cae U." 1x(18 CmvU wCC0 (=a% W1N1ova +m oce rn uW d.=." r m ma a$.ld.a.rl 99010 �0ro1.00.ftm a"m wwm 0' won. Cr Crmm v •bdCae\ � enrP'.AMO b 0'.P arW MGC. 'tbrry' rw1 M &CIO. Q CYC.T GUARSO Or R[C:TG[Rs 1a (117 Pm) IWM m Cut 3 -CM& Dahl 100960 rotary. RM,Tdrp mp98MF .n111 ro emr96. 113.3. 0 10 314,006.(1.. NmumY 1h r U man (011 ar11a1) Dem a11an1 WM Wwn c eler &a,r(S cm= b" -m ow *AMC a'C6 &mama mmmm -M. 17(17dn) Low Crop A"Er(56ap U.DA ace .046 of w" C.111N: O TdN aw boo edw. , x AV i -WL Croundsmaster 200 Series Specifications* (continued) s FULL FLOTATION CUTTING UNITS Q' SIDE D6p1AR6@ YODEL 70SS1 'QYBIDE X • Or REAR ORCIIAROE O6CIIAROE T7 �f CMC7 ARCi R CY! CURD MOMSOU YODEL Aw YODEL mm YODEL xm Agldbra n 5-03—)LO- - Oy fapwrrttp a - w- f —n- Or dock IN O aS (O.B m 11.4 an) t'pal+dad Irpfn mdm Rale At%W OraGkGM MIP das MnP: 1.00 M O15 b 10.1 fmL 120 ar nr n S w af mom 3My: sa aHOC wW a I'lo 2S (2.6 an m 0.B an). � (10—) nlcfanlsb.lm "ExU4T OP CUT I apo m Cr fmr Left ( IS f" cm) hooa ad nramnwer ~ awn aaMp aatmmr. M."30 & 12 Oftw 12 ptga fomr0 am wokM OW aawnmpn wM 7 pMp' 12 OWOa a0aak a (10 ad) bmrd atW mnttneoon wOmd auppan 0ndwb. r (12.7 mm) dap YW16TuvMla 0aa0. wowd awOUNm .O1 Ydag am=m dM, hMnMp, nNamd W7 12 Ot9a 7gf0• wabW auppon I dwmw am 10 V.P OML OnIrJUM. S (12.7 any dap •,.. �.n.. WNbTurr RaWr MaW SMW 12 qmp tomW am -6OW ewwww ton we 7 paupa "m uWOm b mm. T (7.O cm) dada PTO can wka rafamn naanw 9MA1da .tet ftpld woo par W M prn. Owem www ma~ PTO drawn oft d'Naa a Woo -AX aaldMn na to 7 apa+dat aa0-0rmwW wIM a nOOr gain dw Oaiom mm 12C1 aprr am+ am avow abt dw a fty we x"" %*w a" OV t+aang Eads I' pa an) � awl pwL S O'M' do, WAw Otaft tpkfda Oro is fimdad in a p011f0I aopoftaa Cog bw hamq WM ' "Cmn 11a Otl a t0atdn Tamm Mw Oaanga Otaad—ft top. Odw PAOy Wkwd to tda WWOut mob S"dw PAayL I' ms dn) R CUER OW VE aeaWCf.Mdad b a, OWA MaObda po40 t0 adp1M am pada. damwM Anda aMb awn m na ptapaaa UPOW wow OMS (Wwwu t Rom to of Cady. A p0ad.a apOW aan¢dan adadw Puaya O pnda OWb fa naOl f0f01r fA mv- TMa tr Ib oral tag Thn 21.8' (ss an) brq, Tfaaa 2a.7r (B•T Gra) Iaq T1.r 21-7TOB fm) bn1p, r.' 84DE8 2r 18.0 CM).na. V 2S (8.7 an) .Ir, il: 2S (B.7 aN •Ida. 21: Ie mmf Ckdl frO+na+ad q Inly Oadl nwa.atw 17 mm) a1bR 1lwfiaatad (8 fray anal RaOUMYd arae. OuOaan Ra07C+w atm Man arr Obda. abO aadaa (Yma LLO.M Inah auaprOad b OdMfaad avdM llama. "-Da d W b "dddt OWN Oaa ematp auapwfdw W . CARRMA c~ R.ma ww= ciMM una lfobdun am pieta Itlto.np capabft', la) 1'(20 an) aril whvM FRAYS PCL=md a awrm w and BUEPENSION baowg Mr CW9M taaada "Mao raaM $ya w, Pn&srm=r(2D3am)d wo.31(7.8an).M,oat Randa4noufadma'(1O2On) T.0 tnn andraw mm taxa, CASTER "EELS .hob wm naaaaama MOM Oaannpa am ft" Mrnnpa Ipt I m a MOWNUa r a 2 r M a 8.9 CM) ON" apala+M. (OPbWW P11 haft CUM WhIM Autfaay, PIN 2yt OW Iwo mM na) of ROM naOw ale nwmam" low Oaanga W RD W SO BT SO 7? BD AMk.CW ap bcM m aam Tro Ran Ibf1Yf OYra r r r r 01aa. Ttm afr•aoft rota AUNWALP Tad nr aamr aaL fdfMa i v r v Aa®1a &U= FUTLIREB LM a"f wM AYfa r r Rqa oft MPU ft i A r Tmrtla, am Ow pm man wb• walba r r Y Y Dam+Oaar+Ypa tarn— IO bOt natal I Owa"W". ry now DECK Comm pbaOC mMn. ft Ddb I na.a b tr+bw wo Only r amr .m fltW0.0 "Mm br Q ft 4110""m at 11btM COM I tfleaprf0an Y amr ana WT AR21B Mr M Cele andaltafOt � nydtAn .a1da arrMr pfo+ra dock f1oMa0n. BLEW 2m a ro+ kW zea t0a (128 m 28D m. Itmky 10a0 ba. (Iso kO COIW"M8AIAMCa amM zomf2mza awry: Mo" 2m2SO0m MCP. Poem 207>fi0=4 May: I Maas 70m2m Ow. Ummr 2O tdaro kadfw as rm.0 km *I fav 0o b,(al to nr m~ 70Oa mm)ana.mm mwe•.Aa Iaamad am~ w- noiad. 'aa'Of toes& I w0'f vara CM"WrATM CeP OW to raw ft Mutton taatbfr l�tldaf0lnpAAa'a IAN80 paaavtlr, e71.a•tBBy u+e appara0fa Paerr am MM npwmr Rare VW Ml .r�.�...P..o.d.o. .�P oaaMr.aga'.wae � am' w a— eon 7@71 w dtL'a. weu r waw aw raeakaatr SCHARBER & sorts P.O. BOX In 13725 MAIM SWIM MGM. MU SW74 Marsh 27. 1995 Roser Mads City of Mcmia0o 250 E Broadway P.O. Box 1147 Mandoello, MN 55362 Dear Roger: Enclosed please Sod some very spea8e Wfxmmon on tho John Deese F923 and F935 font mower. I am proposing bah of these machines, beat>se they ase identical otter than the items an page 210.7 dent am that the F935 has a (2) 53 gal fit twain, ahem the F925 has bm am and the F935 has a weighs uan10 control vahe Ibr limited slip simehOm and a cruise oomnol where the F925 doe not The aha gwdScltions are enclosed that ga into the details of both mad m—. The pricing of the two nabs ate u fodbsra: John Daae F925 From mma with all standard options 119A ad 23 X 10.50- 12 drive tiro, 72' We discharge mower. and 4 pmt BOPS: $10747.66 John D4 F935 F mown with aru s UAW options Wed. and 23 X 10.5612 drive tire, 7Y sift diaeha* 4 pmt ROPS: $11287,20 if that are any father V%W- please till. I woltld be ghd to P thr000 any with you. 7bank You- Sinately, Saharber 6t Sons ay gm (9) SPECIFICATIONS FOR 2WD COMMERCIAL FRONT MOWER 22 H.P. Yaomar S7.6 chid liquid cooled diesel engine Hlgh energy glow phos Heavy duty drdeaner • Engine on filter • 12 Volt electric tart • 40 Amp automotive alternator • 11 Callon fed capacity • Two pedal hydrostatic foot eoatral • Differential lock • Crohe control • Hydrostatic trout wbed drta • Hydrmtatle power t- I • 27-I&SO.12 turf drive fleet • 16430.8 ribbed steering tiro • Transmtndon oil eaoler • Staring ado brakes • Master brake Dual hydraulic Implement uR eylfoders 2 -spool Hydraulic Control Hoarmeter Storage compartment • Electric P.T.O. Implement drive • P.T.O. shaft drive • Operator pretence system ftel gauge • Low oil pressure warning, light and born • can Iroo rear bumpy with Bods for adding rear weight • Weight transfer valve • Proffesdonal seat Two post Roll Gard ROPE and am bait Tool box Optional Equipment: 72" Side discharge mower. 0AW coststroe 1 with gauge wbeels and and4catp rallem blade to be .712 thick 60" Side discharge rower. 0.171 constructim with gmp wbeeh, and and a* ra0era, blade to be .712 thick 60" Rear disebarge mower. 0.176 construction, with gap wI I and and se dp njkM blades to , be .712 thick � COMMERCIAL FRONT` MCf `ERS z Tike An Entire Committee 1 Tru Mach n.rdbcbarp alowe, /shown/ A" swe040ndle i dta(Slt br a+ea0ent tramnabOy. it pb tbs F921 F977 and F93 A 11- ^ 1M smirch model a unbae batting systa, to, "Pa b 1 �.F N hb all FeoO,. t \ •� - ' %�t. It, SOMS and . "+ • l sues. a The �'� dont Masa caa er -- .•„ hydraLlOcally good 30 doVm - - left or ,fpm. Ad/stsbe said afros, nplansla cutting eaSe. Rb F900 Seder and F314d. 1 Wdarr ambo struts, be racy. Choose tlw sll ► arae ab bcd 00- shower at Afdt. 0, the breapaeA717• rch 2~ sno Bowe, Mob-) Ott fast awe W to 38 Mt. Srmw thrower Sb F700 ' ' �- idy rr Emw Swiss, Snowpaw+r ® coawtbn s7starn 7 NsbSen dsdllprt aR (Mown on F700 Sema) pro.ides Sb F900 Segs art MOM) baturds bnFroved rblblty alta dant. F1141 I 10.wsM eapaclfX 4> 10atb..p..d Prewired. F7b M hoof rirprrera. - � 6AF ergow• MaayAnt Glower. Rb "M sorlae am F1143 wdtd 00ixn dock. G 7 Tde7Uaenwleh6sl atbd► .. rnent mfthea Vasa and aure& beads bads, dMadtov ftgpd 60• dere MMr a Moot M. Calcar dWV rang end dbalmp esoeurw fab fbrrdl Spagai 0), colts k off 00 @aFenea It v sRiA CApsan Mase o@W acosatrtraat dao 00 holt mows. V/s to a atehs eea)< 4wsa0le spindles. acess0t dam &A by of tae slack dune aarrbe Bora stuns shay to Sat dos. Iota $trs 0t "M Sells xir� and Pu" {d®y r 1 )wt open pt doff Rion } aperotor's "M to dump cffxh pt and tares. &S Fbuaw capecft Wo— assiawbr Win". Rb 0700 scene.. IST C15-210-6 F900 Series Front Mowers MOWER DECKS SPECIFICATIONS (Specifications and design subject to change without notice) Front Mower Compatibility: t�1c6 1 � � F91I.................. Standard Optional Optional Notavailable F923 .................. Standard Optional Optional Optional F932 .................. Optional Standard Optional optional F935..... Opuonal Standard Optional Optional Cutlingg W Wed ............. 60 in. (IS24 mm) 72.8 in. (1840 mm) in. (1324 mm) 7b'm (1930 mm) Overall Width ............. 723 -in. (1842 mm) 83 -in. (2159 nun) 65.2 -in. (1650 mm) 78.5 -in. (1994 nun) Blades: Number 3 3 3 3 Blade material .......... Heat treated, bith alloy steel Blade length ............ 20.5 in. (320 mm) CIS -in. (633 mm) 3-im (520 mm) 23.93 -in. (684 mm) Blade width ............ 23 -in. (633 mm) 2.3 -in. (633 mm) 2S -in. (633 mm) 23 -in. (633 mm) Blade thicknev.......... 0.312 -in. (7.92 mm) 0.3124n. (7.92 mm) 0.312 -in. (7.92 mm) 0.2(4 -in. (3.18 mm) Blade drive ............. Double eagle belt Double angle belt HB section belt Friction disk (hex section) (hex section) Mower drive ........... Gearbox. tpiral gears Gearbox, spiral gears Cut iron gearbox Can iron gearbox SpirtNes ............... I -in. (23.4 mm) I -in. (25.4 mm) (beveled gears) I -in. (23.4 mm) (beveledvs) I4u. (25.4 mm) Bearings ............... Gneaseable (through Greaseable (through Grameable (through Tapered roller. spindles) spindles) spindles) gmaseabla Blade 11p Speed (feet per minute) Minimum (3450 engine rpm) 14,693 14,713 14,700 14,414 Maximum (3600 engine rpm) ................ 15,332 15.352 13.300 13,373 aster wheels: Size .................. I Ix4.0D-5 in.. 4 PR (279 x 102 mm) Type... -- .... pneumatic _ Front And -Scalp Roller ..... 9.75 x 4 io. Std 9.75 x 4 in. Std. 9.75 x 4 in. Optional 9.75 x 4 in. Std. Two Rear Antl4coilp Rollers . 9.75 x 4 inch 9.75 x 4 inch NA. N.A. Cu W tsg bright ............. 1.5 to 43 in. 1.5 to 4.5 in. I to 6 in. 1 to 5.1 R in. (38 to 114 mm) (38 to 114 mm) (25 to 152 mm) (25 to 140 mm) Deck olhet ................ 14.4 in. (366 mm) 18 in. (437 mm) 14.3 in. (364 mm) 18 in. (457 mm) Uncut Circle of Grass (without using brake) ..... 34 in. (864 mm) 30 in. (762 mm) 41 in. (1041 mm) 14 in. (3 56 mm) Deck LM height Front ................. 14 to 161x. 14 to 16 in. 8,4 to 10.4 in. 12.0 in. (303 mm) (355 to 406 mm) (355 to 406 mm) (213 to 266 true) Rear .................. 63 to 83 in. 63 to 83 in. 3 to 7 in. 4.75 in. (121 mm) (165 to 216 mm) (165 to 216 mm) (127to171mm) DisehaM ................. Hinged. right Hinged, right Rear Rw Deck contruetlon .......... Deck thickness ............ One•ppttera stomped steel 0.1341n. (3.40 ram) 0.156 in. (3.96 mm) 0.134 in. (3.40 mm) 0.12(1 in. 0.0 mm) Weight,appros............ 330lb. (160kg) 440lb. (200kg) 330lb. (143kg) S15lb. C232kg) Acres ger hour' ........... 23 at 5 mph 3 213 mph 23 at 3 mpb 3.811500 (4.0 at 8:1 km/h) (4.8 at 8.1 kmrn) (4,0 at 8.1 km/h) (6.1 at 8.1 km/h) • The aw per haw is an emmmted ftgaim 77te nwly were ftgtued allowing for a 10 percent tone lav for n vmw widdt once tap, 3 percent time lav for crenae, win Aft em and mowing a anooth area. r� COD 94-C trno in u.w. lountains Into Mow Hills f you've got the wrong equipment, even mow- ing the flats can btt an uphill battle. That's why ■ The Ns...w 22 -hp M1 anew (n.ew) more and more cutters are climbing up on the F1145. a, v4,.m dn4p m With its new 28 -hp high-torque diesel. this machine is Pros r undisputed king of the hills. dsdrae� a,e:_' With the F1145, you can set the 4 -wheel drive full urian w!W Apha W MW w time" for continuous mowing. Or you can let it engage., and disengage automatically, according to changes in terrain and conditions.PS What makes the F1145 so durable? eve y' Fust, tractor -tough componentry. With the F1145'ss= • vA'• i transmission, differentia'.. 2 -speed axle, and planetary :, , ' final drives lifted straight from our best-selling 855 Compact Utility Tractor. And individual wet -disk brakes that allow constant sidehill feathering with almost no wear or adjustment 'There's also power steering and a 224nch turning radius. Plus an exlusive hydraulic PTO clutch with modulated engagement that reduces parts wear.Read iv, more about the F1145 and o 2-wheel•drive 0 Seties n pages 6 through 9. Then see your; dea er or an on-site demonstration.' IftA ..,, ��SL— �� i4az • � �t P:;Jp sc, BpJp eirul 2J•40 gas -'J-hp errs/ '5lnt/r sub opfiwrl J.pm M11P,1 rod m""Iy 16) A T 1 O N S FULL-SIZE FRONT MOWERS 1"11- F111 F92S FM "m F114 TiDe ebe= gn.. 7'dl.:idr o6ll lodnV1.r los C1@6a 7a Ra Tb Ilerlmp.a .. .. 221165w1. ..... ......22051" 2312011M... .. ..27(16.... .. 2Bnae,«'1 NO 01 wlml .. CraaIDml 2 ... ........ ] .. ..... ] ....., .. ..1 .......... 3 nacos MoaRO ......... .. ... Idmald.l .. HYMO .. . , ... .. ..... sdoni5101 ... ..... .. 70"STOMICIV. an 2p3n1/fi llml ....... 21.. (R mal ... 26f. In dtw .. 2A.. (72 amll 1al.(73mm Arae 265. 1R-) .. .. 284. (72-) 251.(72am1 .26..(72am1 3b. 11. coal Dt.urrrc. . . . 37.7y.(61717n5.. .... 331 m. 1619 an'1 ...... 536. n.le790M .. S39ma (6/9 vol 91m m 11113 ml $3Yn.2 Asan .. ..... 12+M ..... ....... .12-.a ..... 12.ad .... .. 12+x1 .... :2+m Fao-1667mm .. ..... Fao-4e1 �®nO6 . Fauba. Dlmrlm6 Fao-heG amtNa :» kna, o�lm] Mm mm U. i.'e.l 111. V. .ma ea.m ww 5" ua +IeD m. era Calm., Low: .............. Lam .. .... ... .. .. LO.a . - ... . umm .. . _w 41ma tYCd IIm+F-o11. mr. .. .... I•en/4dF. an. ..... . m"4", 01 t.urypf7. Qn, �aMty. a1. 71L1FJR mu dddlam Dw omm PKID-. ® tlmmd mlaulm. vba tlmdn : ILOda. me dCRa O. late [ammo FA as 16noeaa NO %w rgdm6y .. FA 60. "OMMM Fm 50.. rwWume :il b. vxc= d1Wam Dwo m 35mm .. dlm•rovn dDa ... Aumac6Wnn .. ka=c ,P Mmlmew"m :an-e,l +v nale�lada IDam dim®r 41"m Sarlmi *fm=m .04M +ft-= -1-M t:anmr tla t110o4Tc V t11md HFmIo= v 17ad V rrm "pm= V vq -4=. If rm aA ndp.yl(pp tab wma-'a to T.dra 0•1O6.0 b-1DSamn �}'a 6 I=O-la3,,vn :-11 emn, 17 kw -P 07u") (17 Tal .Ytjh) (17 uma) :a17., 1135 v.a11 0-531r0 0-531rL,-33abn 0-53mm1 :-31.z,nelVrlel+�I 115 uIVel 115 UnI11 ?Salt) Is5NMI .-:3.3a16e hr.VG-'7. Dllnra m Amhara SLL S tramsum" S vv. Tr w-11:,wCow. R&M ra Rutafm Fl�'m Rammr I'm 'u=ra pm iroe Dwe =m F7arnc allow E ¢ =1110 Deere a=* JM Fkua SIM WIN ala Awl .Q.o Idem 5•C."mm5 sw .ftmom :'m vwm W5 troy arum, amomna .. Dna afOlrmaw I- a =Ii Ow.amnww. :.e t9 $s 7.071em1 r.(tM-) 1,(119 my 7. 1171nm11 'u 1.a iturlp hod a7.. ews Fml"Mach F"a- Fadart Man the F11.lo. mpo951c. Pial 19o'69oa F:wmraum Paw mpmo= ..w mvm=z= IYrb tum boom IL.m7Umbu4D4.* Isrm2tud.boo,au IMr02UMW-090 "i621umb v� Sd.M ad dhamw mddlbal gym ",mm 2-m=Amfa^. cz 2<.ad1 n 0c= 2ydadl %ov= :SGY mvem-s bd mrma am roam "=m bm m" m cu.c.-v OOmw ODD" .. Sa®a Stumm 7xam 4amma Er=a 2ya4 16U m(15U 31 US3(L9U.W tb 3SUS mO L).WbCI 31USm E29U�alrs :IUs al O911.7era her mll-71'J($Y SSUS go(2O8U 53 US OW (205U IIaUS aspISU 116US 901.161.1 'IOUs pf(.1 e11 14y11-,ar.KVV d1U3 a(••U 45usa 14.0 flus qLIddU ./US d9 I••U ;dUS 0I44U 14YC `:. 7 LfOm0.gl�..n1 16) "C FINANCIAL SYSTEM ,25/95 12:35:16 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 37978 04/17/95 MN RECREATION & PARK 37978 04/17/95 MN RECREATION & PARK 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 30408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 30408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 39408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 38408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES '1408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES �—.d408 04/17/95 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 30409 04/17/95 MN STATE TREASURER 38410 04/17/95 HOGLUND COACH LINES 38411 04/17/95 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORD 10412 04/17/05 U.S. POSTMASTER 30413 04/11/95 WRIGHT-H[NNEPIN COOP 88414 04/17/95 MN DEPART OF REVENUE .30414 04/17/95 MN DEPART OF REVENUE SOA 14 04/17/95 MN DEPART OF REVENUE 38414 04/17/95 MN D[PART OF REVENUE 30415 04/17/95 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 80416 04/17/95 HOGLUND/STUART fiENl PAL CHECKING Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAI 618 CORRECT VENDOR R 180.00 881 CORRECT VENDOR # I80.00CR 0.00 +CHEC 243 GEN LIABILITY INS 34.965.00 243 PROPERTY INS PREM 3,460.00 243 VEHICLE INS PREMIUM 3.463,00 243 GEN LIABILITY INS/LIB 541.00 243 PROPERTY INS PREM/LIB 764.00 243 GEN LIABILITY INS/F 4.507.00 243 PROPERTY INS PREM/FIR 867.00 243 VEH INS PREM/FIRE D 3.5$2.00 243 GEN LIABILITY INS/WWT 324.00 243 PROPERTY INS PkEM/W 5.539.00 243 VEHICEL INS PREM/WWTP 747.00 243 GEN LIABILITY INS/S 1,602.00 243 PROP INS PREM/SEWER 24.00 243 VEHICLE INS PREM/SEWE 640.00 243 GEN LIABILITY INS/W 6.842.00 243 PROPERTY INS PREM/MAT 470.00 243 VEHICLE INS PREM/WATE 217.00 68.524.00 262 STATE 8I-0 PERMIT SDRC 975,51 403 HEARTLAND BUS CONTR 0,496.98 254 RECORDING FEE/GILLE PR 19.50 710 POSTAGE/PWORKS 37.00 512 UTILITIES 9.00 119 SALE: TAX/1ST QUARTEk 0.31CR 119 SALF3 TAX/1ST QUARTER 13.61 110 SALES TAX/1ST QUARTER 875.77 119 SAI.ES TAX/1ST QUARFLR 193.43 1.002.00 110 WATER/ATV/'1NOW REG 1.206.00 03 TREE kEMOVAI/S MELT 7.600.00 TOTAL 00.944.99 *CHF, *C 11F RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 18/95 14:41: 42 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38417 04./18/95 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 35417 04/18/95 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 38'418 04/18/95 BEN FRANKLIN 38419 04,/18/95 BRENTESON CONSTRUCTI 18420 04/18/95 C J BROWN BUSINESS S 36421 04/18/95 COMPRESS AIR & EQUIP 30423 04/10/95 EMERGENCY APPARATUS 38423 04/18/95 FOREST CITY ROAD LAN 30424 04/10/95 G £a K SERVICES 38424 04/18/95 G & K SERVICES 30424 04/18/05 G E'• K SERVICES "10424 04/10/95 G 13 K SERVICES 70424 04/18/85 G & K SERVICES 3.8474 04/18/05 G 4 K PERVICES 30484 04/18/95 G F: K SERVICE:; 30425 04/10/95 G C SUPPLY U042G 04/18/95 HENGY & ASSOCIATES 'J04?G 04/10/95 HENRY & ASSOCIATFS 3134-17 04/10198 JIM HATCH 9A1,u3 CO JC420 04/10/05 KRALMER/WANOA 30410 04/10/95 KRAN2/Nr-.IL 042() 04/10/95 KRANC/NLIL ;0410 04/10/05 LAR CON'S ACE HARrWAR JU430 04/1(7/9, LAR5;ON'D ACC HAki)HAR 10480 04/10/05 LAkrON15 ALL 14A0WAR 3J410 04/10/98 LAP ,ON 1'J ACE HAROWAR ,-c,')1) 04/10/05 LW.04'f' ACE HARUWAk 304)0 114/10/9) LARC)ON', ACI! HAkOWAR JCC, 0 04/10/99 ACL 1100WAR )U4 )0 04/10/95 LA.df4M'-i At;f 71AR11WA(2 'U4 -I' 04/10/99 LAkLON'f, ACE HA&DWAR )04)0 06/1G/')'" I.A1.`,0N-3 A -,'L HAPOWA1= '7;)0 04110/"' LAP( -ON'_ A(*E C'Af-IWAk Disbursement Joue-nal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLA 17 CIVIL DEF RADIO REPAI 132.40 17 MTC SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 34.00 166,.40 KCH 20 FILM & BATTERIES/PW IN 10. -37 435 P WORKS EXP/CONST C 2.670. 00 597 CITY NEWSLETTERS 93.431 356 EQUIP REP PARTS/FIRE 207.40 480 TURN SIGNAL/FIRE DEPT 301.47 563 WWTP SLUDGE HAULING C 114. 92 881 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 106. 03 051 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGO 109. 19 051 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS $5.eo 051 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 51. 91 851 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 374. 39 051 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 101. 20 051 UNIFORM' RENTAL CHGS 76. 52 1,.051. 4.7 475 RECYCLING DATTERIES 139. 05 545 MISC SUPPLIE3/WATER DE 34. 24 546 MISC TOOLS/WATER DEPT 242. )0 277. m0 003 VEST/STRECT DEPT 1213. 70 350 TRAVEL REIMO/SEMINAR 14. 00 912 TRAVRI 1?XPUNOE REIMS 399. N 912 CLOTHING RCIM5/FIRE DEF U. 00 30?. 10 074 'SHOP & GARAGE TUOLf- 151. UO 074 MI.�C SUPPLIEDfPH INBPC 1'). 'it 074 MISC ;UPPLIEfJ/WATER DEP ?. 65 074 CLCANING CUP,/LIORARY 0. 71 074 OLE) REPAIR �ILIP/PARKS ^. 11 Q74 MIDC 9UPPI.IC:1/t!H0P R 6A 0. 12 074 SUNNY FRLGH RFPAIkf3 10.'.5 074 010 RCI -Alk GOP/WAT ll 0. 02 07L M3f.0 6UPPLIEG/FlkF E11F' 10. 01 074 NI'; )lIP0LI('G/FLRE 1)'J'T 0. 71 „t, M7'.! !TREE i :1::'L IE G . J MCHC nCHE rClit t 'IRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 4/18/95 14:41:42 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38431 04/ 18/95 M & P TRANSPORT, INC 38432 04/18/95 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 38433 04/18/95 MONTICE'LLO PRINTING 38434 04/18/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38435 04/18/95 RELIABLE CORPORATION 38435 04/18/95 RELIABLE CORPORATION 38436 04/18/95 RENNER & SONS INC./E 38437 04/18/95 RESCUE MAGAZINE 38438 04/18/85 UNI,TEO LABORATORIES ,38439 04/19/95 WEST PUBLISHING COMP GENERAL CHECKING Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLC 241.18 MCHE 265 WWTP SLUDGE HAULING C 200.00 185 REIMB/DOG FUND & SUP 216.14 1,37 ENVELOPES/CITY HALL 1,884.89 148 UTILITIES 31.47 179 MISC SUP/COMPUTER C HAL 6.09 179 OFFICE SUP/CITY HALL 31,.75 41.64 *CH> 181 PUMP INSPECTION/HATER 400.00 267 FIRE DEPT MAGAZINE SUB 21.95 634 STREET SUPPLIES 274.85 250 95 MN SE.SS LAW 600KS 135.10 TOTAL 8,D21.56 FINANCIAL SYSTEM _-/01/95 12:45:37 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 39440 04/27/85 WRIGHT COUNTY 6HERIF 38441 04/27/95 GOVERNMENT TRAINING 38442 04/27/95 U.S. POSTMASTER 38442 04/27/95 U.S. POSTMASTER 38448 04/27/95 U.S. POSTMASTER 38443 04/27/95 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 38444 04/27/95 OLSON & SONS ELECTkI 384404 04/27/95 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 38444 04/27/95 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 38444 04/27/95 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 38445 04/27/85 MINNEGASCO 38445 04/27/85 MINNEGASCO '8444 04/27/95 MINNEGASCO 844 5 04/21/95 MINNEGASCO 3944-3 04/27/95 MINNEGASCO 30445 04/27/95 MINNEGASCO 39445 04/27/95 MINNEGASCO 98445 04/27/95 MINNEGASCO 38440 04/21./95 MN DEPART OF NATURAL GENERAL CHECKING Disbursement Journal DESCR IP.TION AMOUNT CL 487 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 772.19 72 REG F EE/SEMINAR/RICK 160.00 21O JUNK AMNESTY DAY MAIL 328.80 210 SEWER WATER BILLINGS 152.32 210 SEWER NATER BILLINGS 152.32 633.44 118 MATER/SNOW/ATV REG 1.024.00 160 SUNNY FRESH SUPPLIES 32.96 160 COUNCIL CHAMBER LITE$ 172.00 160 REPAIR STREET LIGHTS 43.00" 160 SHOP & GARAGE REPAIRS 40.22 288.16 772 UTILITIES 148.95 772 UTILITIES 101.30 772 UTILITIES 39.94 772 UTILITIES 53.55 772 UTILITIES 4.36 772 UTILITIES 282.84 772 UTILITIES 1.300.37 772 UTILITIES 40.46 1.908.77 118 WATER/ATV REG 1 ,28.00 TOTAL 6.198.80 *Cf *Cl •C; SRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/02/95 07:23:30 WARRANT' DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38447 05/03/.95 AFFORDABLE SANITATIO 38449 05/03/95 ARAMARK 38449 05'/09/95 BARTON SAND & GRAVEL 30450 05/03/95 BRAUN INTERTEC ENVIO 39451 05/03/95 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 3845,1 05/03/95 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 38451 05/03'/95 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 38459 05/03/95 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 38452 05/03/95 CENTRAL MINN .INITIAT 38453 05/03/95 FOBS£ TAPPING 38454 03/03/95 FOSTER-FRANZEN-CARLS L136455 05/03/85 G & K SERVICES 38456 05/03/95 HERMES/JERRY 38457 05/03/88 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC 38486 05/03/95 MN U.C. FUND 30450 05/03/95 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 30460 05/03/95 MONTICELLO SENIOR CI 70401 05/03/05 MTI OISSTRIBUTING CO 384G2 05/03/05 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS 3046 05/03/95 PLUMOERY-PURCELL`S P )04G4 03/03/00 TAYLOR LAND 9URVEVOR )0485 05/03,/95 WALDOR PUMP & EOUIPM 30460 Ub/03/96 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITLI OOoUO 05/03/05 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 30400 00/03/05 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 30400 05/03/95 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 38400 Oa/03195 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 90400 05/03/06 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 9C4G7 05/03/05 WnX64T-HENNCPIN COOP I,;jJVRAt C111:0tflNfl Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C 8.02 LATRINE RENTAL/PARKS 58.58 848 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 114.00 305 NEW PWORKS EXPAN PRJ 40.93 638 PROF SERV/S HANAFOR 3.295.00 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 31.47 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 0.59 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 9.97 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 14.11 $6.14 RC 822 CMIF GRANT PYMT 1.100.2.•1 913 PWORKS EXPAN PROJ/VAL 750.00 61 BOND/STATE HWY DEPT 60.00 851 DEP REG/RUG MATS 20.41 81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50 85 GAS/FIRE DEPT 128.46 130 PVMT/UC FUND/:PARKS OE 178.97 185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1,100.00 139 MONTHLY CONTRACT PV 2,933.33, 209 VEH REPAIR PARTS/PARK 100.01 550 M19C PROF SERV/PLAN 3.040.74 251 SUNNY FRESH SUPPLIES 27.96 i 203 SURVEYING FEES 810..00 309 SEWER/WATER PUMP RE 1,002.60 219 KRAMFR RENTAL./TAXE3 1,510.13 219 TIF O1/IXI 1 PROJ/TAX{. 45.60 219 WWTP RENTAL/TAXES 3C,0.104 210 HRA/ELDERLY PROJ/TAXFS 44.0% 219 MISC WASTE (.'NG/FIRE OP 41.00 219 MIOC WANE LHGL/C PRO 410.00 8.440.G4 •� 512 UTILITIES 0.00 TOTAI. 10.707.')0 RC FINANCIAL SVStE M 5/05/95 12:19:32 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 0 38468 05/05/95 HILLSIDE TERRACE 38469 05/05/95 0 & X REFUSE RECYCLI 38470 05/05/95 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 38471 05/05/95 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 38472 05/08/95 AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOO 36473 05/08/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON :18473 05/08/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 38473 05/08/85 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 30473 05/08/85 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 38473 03/08/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 30473 05/08/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 38473 05/09/95 BRIOGEWATER TELEPHON 3E473 05/00/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 38473 05/00/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 10473 05/08/85 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON ,30473 05/08/85 ORIOGEWATER TELEPHON 30473 05/08/85 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 30474 05/00/95 CLINE/RICHARD 30475 05/00/95 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASS 30470 05/00/95 140GLUND COACH LINES 304 i7 01i/00/95 J M OIL. COMPANY 2000 05/DC/05 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA 304 70 05100/90 LUKACH/JOHN 904%0 0`./08/95 LUKACH/JOHN 30470 01.)/00785 LUKACH/JOHN 30479 05/nD/05 LUKACH/JOHN ;10400 01400/9b MAkL:O OUSINEGS PRODU 30401 05/S9/05 MAf4 II.'S PAPM 7CRVIr, ?Oh01.0b/00/8b MARTIE'S FARM LERVIC 30401 04/00/91.+ MAWTIE''1 I. -ARM ;ERVIC 3L40'1 0 /Oq/35 MIt�;1f.RAGCN "^402 OL,/OMS MIn1Nk6AC(0 7340' �1`�/O(1/9 ; MIt.NPf,ACCn Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C .90390 REFUND/OVERPYMT SEW WA. 20.80 611 RECYCLING CONTRACT 2.482.75 219 SCERG GRANT PAYMENT 2, 760.51 118 WATER/SNOW/ATV REG L. 664.00 260 REPAIR FIRE DEPT DOOR 157.96 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 117.42 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 81.22 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 114.79 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 139.02 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 114. 15 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 50.00 24 TELEPHONE CHARrPS 59.06 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 63.£7 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 101. GI 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 55.19 24 TELEPHONE CHARGE$ 060.30 24 TELEPHONE CHARGES $0.00 1.880.e9 450 REIMS/STEEL TOED SHOE -'4C.09 365 FIRC DEPT TRAINING SUP 42.33 403 HEARTLAND EXPRELS C 4.000.20 95 OIL/FI,RF DCP1' 0.03 00 REG FEE /RICK a 2B:, . 00 327 MII.EA(iE R¢IM13 57.71 3.27 MILEAGE RETMD 10.?4 327 MILEAGE REIM0 19.?4 327 MILEAGE: kE]MD 11).?3 115 .42 1`00 TYPEWRITER MTC AGkMT 220.0,0 107 STREET SUPPLILO 37.00 107 PARK SUPPLIES, 607.03 107 PARK OUVPL.T': 31.1i01 574 , 03 77? UTI1.TTI-:C. 134 1i1) %7. UTILITIRL DL.O!� 712 UTXLXTC 3 ;,')I Z 0 RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 3/05/95 12:19:32 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38482 05/08/95 MINNEGASCO 30482 05/08/95 MINNEGASCO 3,8482 05/08/95 MINNEGASCO 38402 05/08/95 MINNEGASCO 38482 05/08/95 MINNEGASCO 38483 05/08/95 MN COPY SYSTEMS INC 38484 05/08/95 MONTIGELLO HOUSING & 90485 05/08/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 30485 05/08/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 30485 05/08/85 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38485 05/08/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38405 05/08/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38405 05/08/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 30481, 05/09/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 384013 05/08/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 3840$ 05/08/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE I0406 05/00/95 O'NEILL/JEFF 38407 05/00/95 PAGE LINK J0407 05/00/95 PAGE LINK 36407 05/00/05 PAGE LINK 30C(;7 05/00/95 PAGE LINK 70407 05/00/95 PAGE LINK 70407 01/00/85 PAGE LINK 30401 05/00/95 PAGE LINK ^,40/ 05/00/95 PAGE LINK ,0400 US/00/05 RELIABLE CORPORATION i0f;00 05/00/01 RF.LIAP,I.E CORPORATION D0400 05/00/05 RELIABLE CORPORATION 30400 OG/00/05 5FNTRY SY5-TEMS ,j i/00/05 SIMON'3+"tj 1 UMBER CUM if 4691 0',400/05 VA590 RU1L1'GH kFMiWA JJ4 )1 OSI00/9'� VA(4(0 ({171)11I -A REMOVA C'400/05 VALKO RL+E'VILN LEMOVA 004;2 05/U:/On WEIGHT HENNEPIN CFEU H:<1GIPi IILNNCA-TN SFCU 111 N, :1A1 ,'9:. - I14NIi D-isbursvrpcnt Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C 772 UTILITIES 37.31 772 UTILITIES 4.36 772 UTILITIES 155.44 772 UTILITJES 1,017.53 772 UTILITIES 33.41 1 , 4'641.42 *'C 756 COPY MCH MTC/FIRE DEPT 31.95 418 PARTS/PARKS DEPT 8.14 140 UTILITIES 2.110.23 148 UTILITIES 260.25 140 UTILITIES 4,522.79 148 UTILITIES 664.30 148 UTILITIES 14.14 148 UTILTIES 452.03 140 UTILTIES 240.63 148 UTILTICS 474..49 146 UTILTIES 602.89 9.4'38.83 uC 181 MILEAGE REIMS 05.60 703 PAGER CHARGES 18.70 7.03 PAGER CHARGES 8.30 703 PAGER CHARGES 24..50 '/03 PAGER CHARGES 0.39 703 PAGER CHARGES 8.30 703 PAGER CHARGES 0.30 703 PAGER CHARGE:;, C.30 70:3 PAGER CHARGE$ 8.30 01.02 �c 170 COMPUTER EQUIP/C HALL '19.05 170 CITY HALL OFFICF. 00P 54.10 179 MISC 0Fo-1fE SUP/COMPUT 75.20 209.33 100 MTC AGRMT/FI,RI DEPT A 134,10 193 P WORKS INSP SOPPI,IFO 30.21 524 GARF}AGE CONTRACT 0.04.03 5>4 ;ALES TAX/GARBAGE 100.01 524 LFAF PItIfLIP CHARGES 1,120.00 10.317.01 A 075 �L(UP,ITV r4TOLIPP LEG 10.1^ 071) 9' 01:iI.Y MYO /GA:iK'i 19,x') 3!S. 10 A TOYA'_ X7.040.43 �Jb/D�M3 OE:O/,:53 WAkF.ANT i!A"'c' VENPPS a�lJi�RAt. Ci�F.;t(SNG ;)i, -13 05/00'/95 RUFF/NAROLE, 394,34 08/09/95 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 30t0 25 OS/09/05 BEACON BALLFIELUS 304 96 05/00/95 BUSINESS EOUCATION S 384'a? 05/09/95 CONTINENTAL SAFE -TV E 384S8 CRYSTEEL DIET. INC. :9c 'J0 0510!/96 F CEDRITE C�)NTkOL G. I :C4 39 05/09/95 FEEDRITE C.NT ROL S, I 30Sud 0%j/UO/O5 FGRRGLLGA''S 01,/09/95 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE 05/05:/Di Ci:NERAI, RENTAL CONTE °.M2 0:./([1/05 HENfRAI RENTA! C:ENTE 06/09/0`+ Gt &;!, WIT/TME jam' fr4 0',/0'9/0!i 14ARR'Y'0 AUTO 51f%, PLY " 04 05/09 MI) HARRV't' AUTO CUI'ALY ):;'+n4 0`4Uf)/93 HARRY "3 AO 6) SUPA,V 70':•-14 O`,/00/91, NARRY'S AUTO �-UPPLY ,'J ,)4 0:',/U7/';' HAR11Y 10 AUYO SUP PLY .)'•_. 4 Iff i` 1115 HAkRY'R AUTO 'U;'YIY )' , 94 0o/U9/9'3 HAW1V 10 All W SUPVLV G, Ab I)' /+!"/'i'1 tIGVP ; 0 t:RA'V N if I",/f '1'19 .' IrC PA"i OiS�urcement Journal OE'.:Ck]PT1,7N AFIOONT Cl 90391 REIM6/YJA`+ :R PRESS VALV 25..00 3 ANIMAL PL ST CONT/LMY 4G.130 649 PARKS/BASEBALL E>?M' 009..40 914 DEP REGISTRAR SEMINAR 13"„CO 256 EQUIP RE! AIR/FIRE DEPT 2--�J 429 FILTER & GAUGE/STRCET� 3.1io 56 CREDIT 1n^..00CR GB CHEMTCAL. /SEWd R C.iiL 1.544.02 Oil GAS/S'FRCF T P:: r 510 GLOVESI F 1 RE r,p P 1 7ICn.60 U4 SEMP/PARKS vFP r 159..'•1 64 NEW PUP.L3 C WOO I(L DL,' 09.00 249. U0 G�, 4E;'41R 'W7 NOOW/PARS Pl. P 73. D0 7C CORA, c7 c0g1tv'3 39,93CR 70 9UPPLIEGfPN 1lJGPE.. 70 3',PC1.TL'C/1,N0P G GAR G. HP 70 IC+UIP REPAIR PART!./P'AK 50. CA 70 !im)rf Ik_PST&.'1:T OLPT 13.711 id VCN RLP F'Alli rJt'.',1 F'.,, 'I ., 1 90 +i}IIC RLPAItd PARTS/',CH 39.99 Ub.41 7 (_IORARV + LFAFdYi.7 fJ'i ,!�i. 0 06 1,F6AL Ff_ L M', 'G 'A'i I.�n1.4U 0(; i.; 17AF. FCI.e/k nA :U1.+U1 1314 NI(T3 d I)'")L'i')/' L'':,' ii 11;').• , 321 VtN (It tA & Po(:YL I /L 077 ANIMAL ' , Ni' . ''.1 :.Va•. ", G FINANCIAL SVSTEM � aWfI9/13 )8:04:5) WARWANT UAYE VENDOR GENERAL CHt'C'KING D3bl1 (15/09195 MARKHNRD 36513 ,1!00/95 MAUS FOODS 3051? 05/09/95 MAIDS FO. -IDS 30113 0 /?0/95 MAU$ FOODS 36',12 05/09/95 MAUS FOODS :G!T Otd0f)/'99 MEO'COMPASC,. INC. 3051h 05/09/95 MN DUELDIN4 OFFICIAL. 3'IS1', `r"v/OQ/95 MONTICELLO AlJIMAL CO 1b 0:/09/95 MONYiCFLLO OFFICE Gu 05/09/35 MONI'1CFLLO OFFICE PU TOr,1 i 0:3/09/RS Mu47 1_Lt1 OFFlk�F PR J 16 05/09/911 MONTICOLLCP OPFYCE PR 3R', IG ilii/00/95 MON'r'ICE!_LO OFFICE 'PR 31+,17 05/09/95 MANTICELIA PRINTING :it:'tr1 05/09/95 MONTICELLO YIMEJ =id`i 10 Oti/00/95 Mn.JYICLLLkI TIME:) :1t:;!0 01/0-0/0& MONTICELLO TIMED '0'it13 flIJ/00/95 MON714WLLO TIMLt: 'x,10 Ob/09/05 MONI KI L LO 7IMt r tO .i5/no/)S moNrT1,L'•LLO TIMY'G 0 0:,/09/(',9 MONTIIC4•LA YSMRt,; t,�t 1 u',/U:J/4S NAT7G`J�1 C•U`-k11.Nfi PAR I 11+1/01/95 NA'rICNAI. II110HtV f PAP ;_'ti 10 f1G/AL/4� NAII(, JAl I;Ut WSN6 VAS NAlICIAL kllJ`.liTN(3l PAs :.I �",/u t/•�'� ttgi� -. rt;) i N-MnY, a+;rJ 1�1+ ts''./dfrnF� 11{rr• t�...IEN�MAv+r&iN U 001/c';eo C,PtLEN• C-1 AV' i.; -.N _' ,' , ? �,'I,J/a i ��,dR •,CHL' tJ hAV-- . ,. , � ri,!�•r'r `� lIL1F LGtI; '.LN-CAAYt F':1'J .. - � � . x,41' '., i,C•: �, , r -.i ?:1A4' I L."!J Oi gbursam. n't Journu DESCRIPTION AMCJJNT c- 910 AERIAL MAP/PLAN t 2 1,004.60 100 MISC SUPYLTES/C MAIL 169.51 100 MISC CUF'ULIES/Sr1OP 0 G 16,76 103 MISC SUP/WATER UEPT 106 MISC 9UP/LZ;;kARY ?4.03 ?3].00 69S ANNUAL MED EXAMS/FI 1.]60.23 715 QISG FEF/GARY AND,:P''.,;+ 15.00 105 ANIMAL CtN-iPOL CONT 1.140.00 136 P WORK3 OFb•IGE 50,L'I! 175..1 1�0 `"TTY HALL OF�la 5UPP 00:,.J9 1-16 COPY MA' T1INF, PAPER/C 14 IS0 4F,F. REG OFFICE :UP11i iE �e.3'r !?'3 LIBRARY 1'."":°YCE 900.'' ?3.71 1,@30.29 137 FLYtR'� �:OLF?I O/J4014 A.MN 21, 1* 140 LEGAL. PUVLlrAPIF,NC 140 eLo PERMIF iNYC1 ttt7. A 140 PUBLIC MFAr7NG NOTICE 4GC.01 146 WATCR ULIP,;ING INFO 147100 140 AO "DH)C, Ff;k LAWN ',7l6'C 44.Jb 140 A i:lL:i' hliNT HOAR r011 Aha ? . 14 140 MRA "C.;JA (Kl!-NING" !.07 144 koUlP REFA?-fi ''Ars'1:,/rIY t7C.4° 144 M t 't: 3U•+'/'_: P^7.1:1 1-01'.1` 10. ;') 144 HjUi.r' Qf V VAL.'7(•!�',yo-�T' -.;+'i I44 VELI 95 j 1JIi -Lk'„/lil i ASN vt, GU 1'� 1c J11 a: 9/1 •n a 16:1 FtI-.t LN:• fkF, :.i,', MI' L"N,; i r t '.JLt _.. 1,..,,,. 1 R ,�' - a, .� u �'.R� FINANCIAL SY$T'.t,; Wu/ ./9y 03:04:.53 WARf'ANT LATE VENDOR G _fJZtlAL CHEC9ING 30'_t 21 05/09195 FAC.= , INCORPORATED 3052'? 0-,/09/05 PH070 1 3Gea22 6L/00/95 PH070 I 30S?3 05/D9/95 PREt_1,SSE -: CLEANING S 18533 05/09/95 PR'E JSSF'S CLEANING S 10E;�A 05/09/95 PRO'GSGIONAL SCRVECE 38573 05/00/95 RIVTRSIDE OIL 16 _ !:i Ob/09/95 SAG G WELDING & REPA 105.+7 05/09/95 :EVZR^ON/LOWELL 105-0 05/09/93 M -0AM IaUSIM�JS 0 -IM 1C . ". G-.400/05 ST. ,LOU'_+ FI SE EM'lPM 0`/09/99 1'A1'_OR I.ANO iURVEV+)R ;1'„0 0:,/09/95 TAV ! OR , AND ;URV[YOR 05!09/95 WRI W COUNTY t0310 IC, ' , 1 U-,,09/95 WRL 0T CUI)N'rV A'J01 IO Y.M.X. A. QF M1001;AM Oi sbu rslm�-nt Journal 11L!�CRIP'FION AMOUNT 300 HATER TESTING/WATER 0 IDS -00 7.43 Kr SC SUi�PL1ES/PW INSPE 35.00 743 SUPPLIES/P M EXPANSION 22.40 47.4n 173 FIRE DEPT CLEANING CON 50.aO 173 CITY HALL CLEAKIKG rO 400 -OC 450.00 175 WWTP CONTRACT PVMT 43.2?U.?3 496 GAS/STREET OEDS' 915 REPAIR GAG TAS::' 46.0v +030? TREE RF.PIACFMft-'T 10. Cr, 044 LCt3AL t'U'S/C HI1_1_5 V P 4A2 CERVIC-E f11'[ F)tTIN�MR 10E1.�F' 203 'IWZV"VIN3 Ftit.SYLW{ 11,''';6.+1' 203 PW TW,P• d CQPI'. 5 1.0ft 211 WAiYG 7`:iM'ARjv: OE. , 41.00 210 MY;,t; C1,1.,/EA :1V _,,i ' i i '?,O4 7 9. 04 ?14 Pu N(WI.Y 0)N(r A•;i . V1,0 TO-FAL 1. ta', i FINANCIAL SYSTEM �5C j/IV 95 15:38.:'56 Qj sburaement Journal WAPRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Cl GENERAL CHECKING{ 38465 05/19/9$ WALOOR PUMP & EOUIPM 369 CHEGK VOIDED 1-,89'4..60CR 3'0533 OS/12/'95 MARQUETTE SANK,N.A./ 811 TIF DISTRICT 017/L 50,00.0-aO 3'8534 05/12/95 MN DEPART Of NATURAL 118 WATE'Rj'ATV/9t30W REG 3,023.00 38534 05L/1 2195 PLANNING CONFERENCE .90393 REG FER/SEMINAR/.19N SO 15.00 3,038.00 *CI 38536 05/12/95 MONTICE'LLO S1 NTOR CI 138 *F -V* 423'. 13 3,0537 05/16/95 AFFORDABLE 4ANITATTO 802 LATRINE RENTAL/PARKS 5-0.50 70537 05/16195 AFFORDABLE SANTTATIO 602 LATRINE/.JUNK AMNF.STY 0 50.50 117.10 +SCI 36530 05/16/99 ARCA MINNESOTA, INC. 534 JUNK AMNESTY DAY CH 1.822.00 J55'30 05/10/95 BRAUN INTERTrc FNVIO C30 IM EIN WATCP TCCTING 600..00 �0530 OL/16/95 ukAL1N uTERrvo ENVId 338 FN6 FEES/C HILLS V 1,250.00 4,850.00 aGt L1;1:,40 05/ 16/CJS DUFFALO I3TTUMI40005. 211 SAND/NEW PW SHOP PRJ 1011 50 j T,OZ4I 05/16/05 CENTRAL MINN 7NITIAT 02'2 POSTAGE/B4OOK/11RA 15,. 00 I -7054') 0!{/16•/95 CLARK FOOD SERVICE. 097 FIRE DEPT CUPPLIF,', 111.74 r 70662 Qb/16/05 CLARK F000 CERVICE, 007 CITY HALL 9UPPLTES 14.(14 t2(1.;LO oE„ 054J 05/10/'91{ COMPiIJIITONER OF T'RAN 24L1 DIKE PATHWAY 97,031..00 D,C�)46 05/19/05 COMPUTPR .PART) 8 OLN 500 PC iAfiMORV/COMP1IT11R f0 201..45 ?10545 05/19185 OQPY DOPLOATINO PROD 41 LII1RARVACIPY MC,11 MTC 514.40 JOtf((l; U'r/10/'05 CULtIGAN 743 WATGR 10FTNER CH(;JRkNT 33. 11 5C',rii 0&/1!3/75 DAVT`( WATER FQIJTPf4RN ^?90 (aA:% Df~i6�50R/tF.WFR 1,740. G0 � / D')/10/913 OAVIG WATER 1:r)UIPMI44' '200 M/')C :iUP/NVW PW .,NO 1.225.60 2, L 4 J 0 / I()/0'S 011TV/tIARF4 40 1`111J( A(iL: CXPCN! C 7ti' 70 Vt4TV/94r;CN 40 hil-LAOF REIFth/DANt< 10,'_)? )0')4J 05110/01� Ili ljV/ItARf.N AO LE00/004P1ITFR (A.A';'; 01.00 :'•aC 05!16/','.. (k�TY/1 AL:I't7 40 MIt 4A01- RCIMG/I;OMP Ct.A 0 .4U "0`_6`,1 U' /9Cr''J`. F� I•tt1E:1; 10LI 1•(44TAN '.t) 111',[ II1'PLI1, ;/HATE& 0E "6.116 Flf-4ANG•IAL SYSTEM -C / 1,8/ 95 15:39:56 HARRAN'T DATE VENDOR 24.28 OENER'AL CHECKING 3'8650 08/ 16195 FLICKER' f' T.V.. a APP 3,8351 0$/16/9S G & K SERVICES 5855.1 OS/16/9'5 0 & K SERVICES I85S1 00/ 1I3/93 G & K SERVICES 385,i1 05/18/95 6 & K SERVICES 38551 05/16/95 G & K SERVICES 30951 05/10/95 G & K SERVICE$ 38551 05/ 16/9`3 6 & K SERVICES 3055:' 05/16/95 GARTNER' S OFFICE PRO :OLS QE/10'/135 6041L0 dROS. CHEV-OLO 38554 05/ tG/'95 HATCH -PE rER50N SALES 30554 00/16/9(3 HATCH=PE"TER30N SALES 305t)!, 05/ 1G/9A LAKE AFG XON COOP O.IL i 3055( 05/16/03 LARSON' 0 ACE HAROWAR AU' SG 05110/95 LARSON'''S ACG HAROWAR 3f15r 05/18195 LOCH JCWEURG 90')5[2 05/16/95. METRA SAA.ES INCORP®R 30!t �t7 03/ 10/0,5 NIck00I0i3OG7G5, INC. 90UGE : 0,/1'W35 MI0DC. N00RF/Jt3HN ; 0'SO^ Ori/10/,Ws MIDWEST V19YOU DI:'TR 3156 05/1019)!: NIOHEJT VIOXOI O,IM L'S `2 0`,3/10/8'3 MN E01'Ll1T PO MORAl 311',x• 0Rd 10/'`!t OLGON C' OOPJ' F1 E6TR1 �; `�L". OGa'1J/'J9 OLf_ON � SIIiJ:Ei,CQrRt 3n`•' "' 0Si 10/r,f� pl`..OH C "1)rJ` FLPt`1pi7 FIXCTRI PAln A WAtDG;Oft t> AG: Disbursement Journa 1 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Cl 60 DOOR ALARM/CITY MALL 27.88 851 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS. 69.14 851 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 97'.06 851 UNi'FORM RECTAL CHGS 24.28 Q51 LINIFORMRENTAL CHGS 24.29 851, UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 130. 1.2 851 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 09.86 05.1 UNIFORM, RENTAL CHGS 49.95 414.28 371 RETURN PtW CWPOSTAGE :3.04 70 MTC OF FIRE DEPT VEFSC 771.72 94 GLOVES, E300TSr/STREET, 07.80 84 CRoam1,,ETC/STREET'4 0411. G2 717.51 918 TIRES/JUN1: A14NE9I'Y nA 110.50 874 M19C 'IUPPLIL9/0TRGCT 5 '32..,JO 87h A91SC OFFICE 9UP/WATC-R 55.10 563 PLAQUE/HRA MEMBER 43.50 0'10 MTC AGRMT/FAX MCH/C H 105.00 801 WATEET TOTING/WATER OE 60.00 000 REIFI9/PUM2/9UNtJV FW111 25.00 290 GLA`TREO/P 1OMW 0?.,00 270 f3140')E51GTRF.FT RCPT 1q.00 01lot) 19,7 �I ttATEi(.: TA7t FCt/";`10 iti 1.00 160 C' WA1*4 F L1.6H1 PEP -'\I 400.5^ 00 Ea'It: GUPOLI(; ,Tl,lJ-T L -T 160 f11!'.6• 5UPPI-ILONATFE UE IUD 1:IRJ:3Y FR(:',H !;IIPI1 It. 03f, F116"; ?Rllh 'iFRV/HAIL -Z OHO ('LO 30-41f 'TT00 I I ! L 10 /.'" i ro 0) 1C FINANCIAL SYSTEM /16/95 15:39:56 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 9856i; 06/10/95 PETERSEN'w MON.T FORD B0507 03/18/9S SCHLUENDUP CONSTRUCT 30bas OS/1,6/'98 SORBUS 30iG8 05/16/95 SORBUS 30f'68 0F,/16/95 SORSUS 30500 05/16/95 SORBUS 38580 05/16/95 SORBUS 30568 06/16/95 SORSUS 36568 05/18/95 GORBUS 38500 05/10/95 SORBUS 70560 05/16/95 SORSUS ~9508 05/16/95 SORBUS 70586 05/16/95 SORBUS ,,8560 05/16/95 SORBUS 7,8589 05/16/9.5 UNITOG RENTAL SkkVIC 00569 06/16/35 UNITOG RENTAL OERVIC 0511.4/95 UNITOG RGNPAL OCRVIC 90574 0511&/85 VIKING ELECTRIC 311PP DG571 0')/10/95 WALOOR PUMP $ FCIU•I'PM,' 05 10/94 WO LF3TLLLER/RICHARO 4!p IG/95 WRIGH3 COUNTY AUD•ITO §c117 051161911 WRIGHT CDUNTY AUOrT9 'iUD1(15/IV/95 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITA D•lsbuesement Journal OESCRIPTION AMOUNT O1 165 MTC OF FIRE IYEPT VEXIC 24.76 187 DUG UP WATER MAIN 210.00 318 MISC MTC SUPPLIES/C HAL 3. 1,8 318 MISC SUPPLIES/PW INSPEC 6.39 318 SUPPLIES/SUNNY FRESH 92.00 318 MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS 0 252.91 318 MTC SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 31.65 316 MISC SUPPLIES/WATER DEP 5.05 316 SMALL TOOLS/STREET DEP 25.22 318 BLD REPAIR SUP/PARKS a.98 319 EQUIP REPAIRS/EIRE DEPT 3.1$ 310 SMALL TOOLS/SHOP 8 GAR 34.59 318 MISC OUPPLIEO/SHOP M G 70.68 318 CLEANING &UP/LIBRARY 15.93 1441,01 'PIC, 211 UNIFORM CHARGES 45.00 211 UNIFORM CHARGES 30.16 311 UNIFORM CHARGF`i 30.17 105.33 aL• 910 MOTOR REPLAUEMkNT/9 1,105.00- 36B PUMP RFPA3R/,EWkR C 2,h40.46 217 CONFERCNOE REIMD FL'C7 141.15 219 CHERIFF',4 C(ffN,1nACT '14,h6i).43 210 A01)'L LANDFILL UH60 V,GhG.15 218 TAU DOOtt LISTIC400 /?!;.9P J 1 .'.4.1 .60 b''+ OWNL'RAL (,14CCKIW! TOTAL 117.')5q.510 FINANCIAL SYSTEM �C /0'.1'/85 1.2:48:24. OisDursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL 1,ST NAT BANK OF MONTICELLO 1,8064 04/24/85 LIEFERT TRUCKING: 800025 MARCH 'FREIGHT C,HARGAS 530.84 1,8085 04/24/95 PA'USTIS & SONS 800103 MARCH WINE PURCHASE 3,06..48 1:8066 04/24/95 MCDOWALL COMPANY 800065 MARCH COOLER REPAIRS 119.50 1'8067 04/24/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEP14QN'80000,2 MARCH TELEPHONE'C:HARG 22'1.36 18'068 04/24/95 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESSA 800022 LIQUOR PURCHASE 300.02 18068 04/ 24/95 JOHNSON BROS MH6LES4 806622 WINE PURCHASE 2,1'21.52 2,421.54 *CI 18069 04/'24/95 GRIGGS. COOPER & CON 80001,8 LIQUOR PURCHASE 894. 15 1807A 04/24/95 TRAVELERS DIRECTORY 800007 ADVERTISING 196..00 10071 04/24/95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 8001'00 WINE PURCHASE 275.21' 18071 04/24/95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800180 LIQUOR PURCHASE 2. 107.90 2,463. 1 1 *CI 0 C`07? 04/24/95 EAGLE VINE COMPANY 000012 MT:X FOR RESAL2 40.89 18072 04/24/95 EAGLE VINE COMPANY 800012 WINE PURCHASE: 882.43 032.32 *C( 16013 0.4/24/98 LEAGUE' OF MN CITIE'S .000065 INS PREMIUM 2,330.00 18074 04/24/95 U S WEST COMMUNICATI 800098 AOVERTISING 27.90 10075 04/14/05 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 WINE PURCHASE 177.79 10075 04/24/96 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 806012 'MI% CRE0T/OAt4AGvO 5.79CR 1'72.00 *C! 10076 04/24/95 QUALIT4 'WINE 6 SPIRT 0 0004 0 LIQUOR PURCHAZE 1 .168.73 19070 04/26'/98 QUALITY WINE 6 SPI'RI 000040 MINE PURGMA8E 729..82 1.090.55 *C, IU07'7 04/14/96 9RIt3Gz. COOPER 8 CON 000010 LIQUOR PORCHAOC 2.902.07 1 10077 04,/24/05 GRIG,GS. COOPER 8 COM 000010 WINE PURCHASE 423.36 3.416.23 st 10070 04524/05 PHILLIPS) WINE ft BPIA 00010.0 WINE PURCHASE 600.17 t0U1C 04/24/95 P9LII;I.IPCi WINE it OPIA 000100 L100UR PURCHASE 023.'20 1,371.45 ioulo 04124/93 JOHNSON' F)ROO WHOLEOA 000072 LIQUOR PURCHA9E 92.00 001.0 04,l241O5 JOHNSON OROS WHOLESA 000022 WINE PURCHA-5E 04?. 25 034.2'1 Nf C FINANCIAL SYSTEM /01/95 12;:48:!24 Disbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL LST NAT BANK, OF MONTICELLO 18080' 04/24/95 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE 1800019 BEER PURCHASE 7.,181,.50 1'8081 04/24/95 RELIABLE CORPORATION, 119 CLEAN CARPET 266.1'5 1808,2 04/14/95 JOHNSON. B'ROS'WHOLESA 800022 LIQUOR PURCHASE d„974..40 1,8082 04/24/'90 JQHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 WINE PURCHASE 1.075.07 3.049_.47 *CF 18083 04/24/95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800180 LIQUOR PURCHASE '4,454.90 18083 04/24/95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800180 WINE PURCHASE 832 -OS 18083 04/24/95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800180 MAX FOR RESALE 25.50 18083 04/24/95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800180 MISC F00D ITEMS/RESAL 208.,80' s, 521,.09 *Cl 18084 04/24/95 CITY OF MONTICELLO 800003 SEWER WATER BILL 22.51 18088 04/24/95 GRIGGS, COOPER & COM 800019 LIQUOR PURCHASE 1,675.83 18086 04/24/85 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 MISC MIX FOR RESALE 19,:,50 04/24/95 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 WINE PURCHASE 1,137.38 1 c8088 , 1, 157, 08 *Cl' 18087 04/24/98 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 WINE PURCHASE 1,.299.43 10098 04/24/95 PAUSTIS & SONS 000103 WINE PURCHASE 282.80 18089 04/24-/98 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 000017 WINE PURCHASE 41.88 10000 04/24/95 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 800040 WINE PURCHAJE 123..21 10000 04/24/84 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 800040 LIQUOR PURCHASE 1,069.29 1, 103.50 *C' IST NAT BANK OF MONTICELLO TOTAL 30.572.51 C4 RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM j5/03/95 15:02:22 Disbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT c IST NAT BANX OF MONTICELLO 18081 05/04/95 BELLBOV CORPORATION 800098 MDSC ITEMS FOR RESALE 3212.03 1.--8092 05/04/95 BE RNICK'S PEPSI COLA 900001 POP PURCHASE 47,3.15 18093 05/04/95 BkIOGEWATER TELEPHON 800002 PHONE CHARGES 248.04 18094 05/04/95 CONSOLIDATED COMM DI 800163 ADVERTISING 40.25 1,8095 05/04/95 oAHLHEIMER DISTRI.BUT 800009 BEER PURCHASE 12,357.25 18095 OV 64/95 DAHLHEIMIR DI$TRIBUT 800008 NON ALCOHOLIC BEER 142.20 12.509.45 *� 18096 05/04/95 DAY D'IST'RIBUTING COM 600010 BEER PURCHASE 469,10 18097 05/04/95 DICK WHOLESALE CO.. 8000'11 BEER PURCHASE 2,052.55 18097 08/04/85 DICK WHOLESALE CO., 800011 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 32;.48 2,085.03 cC 18098 00/04/05 DISCOUNT PAPER PROD,U 800.117 PAPER & RIBBON SU,PPLIE 80.1.8 ,10099 05/04/95 EAGLE MINE COMPANY 80001.2 WINE PURCHASE 917.22 10008 09/04/93 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 MI% FOR RESALE 10.,72 335..84 nC 16100 03/.,04/,03 FL ESCH'S'P'APER CERVI 800,118 PAPER BAGS 200.10 (f 101'00 06/04/95 EL ESCH'9 PAPER SERVI 800115 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 55.08 255.19 �4 10101 05/04/93.0 8 K SERVICE 800129 RUC MATS/MTC OF B-LD 40.98 10102 08/04/93 ORIGG6, COOPER 0 COM 800010 LIQUOR PURCHASE 9.420.93 10109 05/04105 GKOSSLEIN BEVERAGE I 800010 BEER PURCHASE 4.94T.25 10104 05/04/93 HOME JUICE 800130 JUICE FOR REGALE 32.00 1,0105 05/04/95 10FIPSON BROS WHQLEuA 0,000?2 LIQUOR PURCHASE 4,930.08 10105 05/04/0`5 JOHNSON DRO8 WM©Lf,SA 000022' WINE PURCHAOG 1.455.01 10'105 05/04/05 JOHNSON DIZOV WyOLECA 000022 LIQUOR/OCTOBER 27 1 1.775.01 C,SG0.00 9r 10106 05+ 06195 it-10t BANDY Q TnI)ACCO 00001?1 GIGO 0 CIGARC FOR Rff,A 67.70 101(10 05/04/15 d1:UL CANOY & TODACCO 000021 LI11U®R STOWL* ')UVPLICJ 64.OI1 192.50 ♦f. 0I5/04M5 LARSON40 ACE HARDWAR 000104 CLEANING ';1)PPI ICC 0.51 10100 05/04/+J!1 MC DOWALL COMPANY 000005 COOLER kFPAlUG f'40.16 1RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 5/03/95 15:02:22 Disbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT IST NAT BANK OF MONTICELLO 10109 05/04/95 MINNEGASCO 800160 UTILITIES 89.64 18110 05/04/95 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 800031 OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.42 16111 05/04/95 NORTHERN STATES POME 800035 UTILITIE'S 805.54 18112 05/04/95 PAUSTIS & SONS 000103 MINE PURCHASE 20.30 18113 05/04/95 RON'S ICE COMPANY 000041 ICE PURCHASE 269.42 18114 05/04/95 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 800045 MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE 47.45 18114 05/04/85 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 800045 JUICE FOR RESALE 15.25 119114 05/04/95 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 000045 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 14.90 77.60 10115 05/04/95 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 BEER PURCHASE 21,114.85 10115 05/04/95 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 00006,9 NON ALCOHOLIC BEER 229.30 21,364.15 zi 10116 05/04/95 VIDEO PROTECTION SER 800189 PAYMENT/VIDEO GAMER 2.600.00 10117 05/04/05 VIKING COCA-COLA GOT 800051 POP PURCHASE 405.10 10110 05/04/95 WRIGHT COUNTY TREAS/ 000134 TAXES/SIDEWALK IMP PRJ 93.62 10119 05/04/95 ].EE MEDICAL SERVICE 000054 MEDICAL 4UPPLILS 26.09 ` IST NAT BANK OF MONTICELLO TOTAL 56,315.22 S