Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 07-24-1995
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING . MONTICELLO CM COUNCIL Monday, July 84, 1898 - 7 p.m. Mayor. Brad Fyle Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held July 10, 1995. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. A. Consideration of funding a portion of the cost to reconstruct 4th Street hockey rink. B. Consideration of accepting comprehensive sanitary sewer study. 4. Citizens commentalpetitions, requests, and complaints. • 6. Consent agenda: 5A. Consideration of authorizing a temporary gambling license -- St. Henry's Catholic Church. 6. Public Hearing --Consideration of vacation of a portion of Hart Boulevard in conjunction with development of the Mississippi Shores Senior Housing pr*CL 7. Public Hearing• -Consideration of vacation of a atom water and utility easement in conjunction with development of the Mississippi Shores Senior Housing Project. 8. Continuation of public hearing on Maplewood Circle storm sewer project. 9. Public hearing on adoption of proposed assessment roll for delinquent utility bills and certification of assessment roll to County Auditor. 10. Consideration of renewing City membership in the Economic Dovelopment Partnership of Wright County, Inc. 11. Consideration of granting an increase to the individual pension for Volunteer Firefighter Relief Association members. Agenda City Council July 24, 1995 Page 2 12. Review of HDR technical memorandum on wastewater treatment plant design data. 13. Consideration of establishing a policy addressing granting final occupancy prior to completion of required home site grading and landscaping improvements. 14. Consideration of purchasing a switchbo: and an additional laser printer for city hall use. 15. Consideration of bills for the month of July. 16. Adjournment. MINUTES REGULAR bIEE`MG - FdONTICELLO Crff COUNCIL Monday, July 10, 1998.7 p,m- Members Present: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault Members Absent: None AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUWF AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD JUNE 26, 1996, AS PRESEN'T'ED. Motion carried unanimously. A. Public Works Director John Simola updated the Council on negotiations with HDR Engineering for the wastewater treatment plant expansion. HDR is currently working on amendments to the Facilities Plan, and it was staffs view that the City should move ahead with the project based on the estimated 76 housing starts per year and based on commercial/industrial growth as projected in the original plan. Simola also reported that staff and Council members have visited various plants using sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) and oxidation ditches, and staff will be receiving additional information !}om an SBR plant in Kansas that handles the same type of waste as Monticello. Citizens commentatpetitions, requests, and complaints. A. Mr. Don Doran of 616 Maple Street requested that Council investigate installing stop signs at the intersection of 6th Street and Minnesota Street, which has been the site of three accidents during the last two to three weeks. Doran also requested that the City mow between the railroad tracks and 6th Street in the area of the old bulk plants. Mayor Fyle noted that the City will review the intersection of 6th Street and Minnesota Street and will direct the Building Department to check the grass height as requested. Page 1 0 Council Minutes - 7/10/96 Consent Agenda: 6A. Consideration of ndnnt�ng a neanl�tion ap m 'ng thn lA9f, H rtland 1�+.n?tnBB AnA�ninnnt P An, Recommendation: To adopt the 1996 Heartland Express Management Plan. SEE RESOLUTION 96-48. :, � 8=7-7". I,I •: M Recommendation: To accept bids and award the contract to Barbarossa & Sons in the amount of $1,020,718.96 subject to the following: All roadway and utility easements necessary to construct the project must be provided by Tony Emmerich. Approval of plans by MN/DOT State Aid officials. Award of contract is contingent on adoption of the assessment agreement. 6C. Cnnsidnratinn of ndnlfniY want+_ sa�m �,nt ag nmrnt - Rehoel Be +Inv rd+ Pmj_ect moan, Councilmember Herbst requested that item 6C be removed from the consent agenda and placed at the end of the regular agenda. A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATIONS AS NOTED IN THE CONSENT AGENDA, EXCLUDING ITEM 5C. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Fyle opened the public hearing. Public Works Director John Simola reported that the proposed project involves a small amount of storm sewer and re -grading of drainage ditch easements in the Maplewood Circle area. The estimated construction coat of the project is $10,000. Simola noted that some property owners have indicated a willingness to perform some of the work themselves to help lower Page 2 0 Council Minutes - 7/10!95 the cost, and they have also requested City assistance in funding the project. Estimated assessments if calculated by square footage would range from $260 to $1,181 based upon the original estimated cost of $8,604. Rick Jarvis and Tim Churchill, residents in the Maplewood Circle area, expressed their opposition to the storm sewer project, as the drainage nuisance does not threaten any homes in the area. They noted that the proposed re -grading would kill mature oak trees on their properties, thereby reducing property values. Julie Henrichs noted her opposition to being assessed for the project. She stated that her property does not contribute to the drainage problem. Simola noted that he will direct the Construction Inspector to recheck the direction of drainage from Henrichs' lot. Howard Lenzen and Gary Sandman noted that the intent of the project is to route the drainage through the easement rather than through their property. It was their view that the proposed project should avoid damaging trees in the area if possible; however, they would like to regain use of their property. Public Works Director Simola suggested that the City consider using the existing easement for elope easement in the areas of the trees, and pay property owners for additional easement where needed on the other side, which would save the trees and also help recover use of at least half or more of the property some residents are currently losing for drainage purposes. Additional information may be available in two or three weeks. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO JULY 24 REGARDING STORM SEWER EWROVEMENTS TO THE MAPLEWOOD CIRCLE AREA PENDING NEGOTIATIONS WITH PROPERTY OWNERS ON READJUSTING TRE EASEMENT. Motion carried unanimously. Public Works Director Simola reported that phase 11 of the public works facility expansion is in final stages of construction; however, staff requested that Council consider a change order for the following items: Install fire chafing on the top of the masonry wall between the now wash bay and old maintenance shop at a cost of $250. Relocate the roof drain fbr the new roof on the maintenance shop and the roof of the wash bay at a cost to be determined. Page 3 Z Council Minutes - 7/10/95 Re -pipe the exterior hose bib to hard water at a cost of $399, less credit for deleting future exterior irrigation pipe. Installation of concrete block bond beam reinforcements at a cost of $325. Additional painting for block stripes, exterior of the door frames and windows, and skylights at a cost of $1,875. City Engineer Bret Weiss noted that OSM will negotiate with the City for paying a share of the change order cost caused by plan irregularities. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRT Y ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO AUTHORIZE CHANGE ORDER Y2 FOR THE FIRE CHAFING INSTALLATION, RELOCATING THE ROOF DRAIN, RE -PIPING THE HOSE BIB TO HARD WATER, INSTALLATION OF BOND BEAM, AND ADDITIONAL PAINTING FOR BLOCK STRIPES, EXTERIOR OF DOOR FRAMES AND WINDOWS, AND SKYLIGHTS AS PROPOSED. Staff was directed to negotiate with the architect in regard to paying a share of the change order cost. Motion carried unanimously. Public Works Director John Simola reported that this year's project consists of 41,751 sq yds of sealcoating in the eastern portion of the community. Two bids were received on July 10, 1995. The low bid was submitted by Astech Corporation of St. Cloud, at a price of $31,312.50 including sweeping, and an alternate bid of $28,389.93 with the City performing the sweeping. Simola noted that the bids were higher than estimated, which could be the result of bidding later in the summer rather than in the spring; however, it was his view that the sealcoating product is better if done during the hot summer rather than in the spring. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO AWARD THE 1995 SEALCOATING PROJECT TO ASTECH CORPORATION OF ST. CLOUD AT A PRICE OF $31,312.50, INCLUDING SWEEPING, AND USE STATE -AID MAINTENANCE FUNDS TO COVER THE COST ABOVE THE BUDOETED AMOUNT OF $27,600. Motion carried unanimously. Page 4 Z Council Minutes - 7/10/95 Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the Meadow Oak 4th Addition consists of 13 lots that were platted in the early 1980'x. Developers now wish to install utilities and ask that Council adopt a development agreement which outlines terms associated with installation of utilities very similar to the agreement adopted for the River Mill subdivision. He noted that in terms of the financial guarantee, the agreement requires establishment of a disbursement agreement, which asaures the City that funds are available to complete the project as outlined in the approved plana. It was also noted that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has indicated that due to the small size of the development, they are willing to grant the sanitary sewer permit necessary to support this project, as they are satisfied that the City is moving forward to resolve the wastewater treatment plant capacity problems. Council discussed the small lot sizes in the development, and it was noted by staff that when the area was originally platted, the City required dedication of pathways and other common open space areas in exchange for allowing smaller lots. Due to the fact that the lend is platted, there is little that the City can do now to require that the lot sizes be increased. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BEING MET: Review and approval of the grading plan by the Army Corps of Engineers to determine consistancy with Army Corps of Enpnoers wetland regulations. Approval by the City Engineer of the final utility plans. Final revision and updates as deemed necessary by the City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously. 10. m mnannt Benda for dincusginn. 5C.rnnrAdnratinnofarigangnaneumnntnarepmnnt- Rehod Boulevard. $�tject 96-09C. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that according to the plan for the School Boulevard pmJect, the City is to complete conabvWon of the pre ject and pay for the construction cost via a recent bond issue. Tony Emmerich will then reimburse the City through payment of Page 5 O Council Minutes - 7/10/95 special assessments, which will be levied against the Klein Farms North, Klein Farms South, and the Monticello Business Center area. He noted that because the land is not being platted at this time, the agreement focuses on financing the prgject only. When the land is platted, a development agreement will be prepared, and the assessments against the original unplatted parcel will be assigned to the newly -platted parcels. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO ADOPT THE ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT GOVERNING PAYMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMEN79 FINANCING THE SCHOOL BOULEVARD PROJECT SUBJECT TO: 1. Review and final approval of the agreement by the City Attorney. 2. Developer providing the City with a letter of credit in the amount of 6096 of the assessment expense. S. Developer providing the necessary roadway and utility easements. 4. Final approval by MN/DOT of state aid designation and approval of Highway 25 access request. Motion carried unanimously. There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned. Karen Doty Office Manager Page 6 0 Council Agenda - 7/24/95 3A. Conaidemticun of funding a portion of t_he cost to reconstruct 4th strut hockey rink. (J.o.) - A. FF RRN Ain BA .KGRO iND: The Parks Commission requests that the City Council approve finding of a portion of the cost to reconstruct the existing hockey rink and to develop a smaller temporary hockey rink that would be installed in the late fall and removed prior to baseball season. This item is not in the 1995 budget; however, it is important that the work be done in 1995. Therefore, the Parke Commission requests that funds used to support this project be paid out of existing capital funds and then paid back to the general fund out of the 1996 budget. Following are reasons supporting the project: 1. Many of the boards need replacement due to the fact that they have completed rotted out and have exposed jagged edges. The plan as proposed would remove all of the rotted wood and use the good materials that remain for the second rink. 2. The existing rink is larger than necessary; therefore, the proposal calls for actually reducing the size of the main rink by about 1/4. 3. Mother problem at 4th Street Park is that the general public has no place to play hockey during Hockey Association practices, which results in hockey players using the general skating rink. This problem is very difficult for the attendant to control. By adding a second rink, the conflicts between hockey and recreational skaters should be eliminated. 4. Finally, the 1992 recreation survey indicated that winter recreation facilities are reported to be substandard. Upgrading the hockey rink facility is a positive response to this problem cited by the public. O her items nfno o relating to the irk The Hockey Association Amded and constructed the existing hockey rink, which is available for use by the general public when practices are not being held. The current proposal for funding the 4th Street Park rink includes City funding of the majority of the materials with the Hockey Association providing labor, Construction of the storage room within the warming house was also tumded by the Hockey Association. Council Agenda - 7/24/95 As a final note regarding park operation, the ice maintenance program is working satisfactory. Under the program for the park, the Hockey Association floods the hockey rink and the general skating area, while City crews remove snow. Following is the plan for upgrading hockey facilities at the 4th Street Park. 1. The Hockey Association will remove the existing boards from the main hockey rink. It is estimated that this will take 80 man-hours, resulting in a value of labor of about $1,600. 2. The hockey boards that are in good condition would be separated from the rest and donated to the City for a small seasonal rink. As noted earlier, the Hockey Association funded the entire cost of the existing rink and will donate the boards to the City for development of the smaller rink. It is estimated that this value will amount to about $500. 3. New hockey boards will be purchased for the balance of the seasonal rink. Under the plan, the City will fund this portion of the prgject at a cost of $2,000. 4. City crews will build the seasonal rink sections. They will be installed in November and removed in April by the City. Summer help on staff will do the work associated with building the seasonal rink sections, thereby reducing the cost of the labor involved. It is estimated that it will take 160 man-hours to complete the construction of the rink sections, which results in a value of $3,200. 5. The City will purchase materials for the main rink at a coat of $5,000. 8. The Hockey Association will install and paint the main rink. Total man-hours are estimated at 160, resulting in a labor value of $3,200. In summary, if one includes both cost of materials and labor under the plan as proposed, the total cost to make the improvements as proposed will amount to $16,820. The cost of materials amounts to $7,600, of which the City would fund $7,000. The labor value is estimated at $8,000. Of this amount, the Hockey Association will contribute $4,800. The City, by building the seasonal rink sections, will contribute $3,200. Total contribution by the Hockey Association under the plan is $5,300. The City contribution is $10,200. Council Agenda - 7fMM Motion to adopt the plan for replacing the hockey rink boards and building a secondary temporary rink for use at the 4th Street Park. Motion to deny the plan for replacing the hockey rink boards and building a secondary temporary rink for use at the 4th Street Park. l',_ STAFF F, ,OMMF.Ni�ATION: It is the view of City staff and the Parke Commission that the existing hockey rink must be rebuilt, or it should be closed. The boards are definitely in need of replacement, We also concur that having a second hockey rink at that location will provide greater opportunity for general use of the general skating area by separating hockey fivm general skating u --m, which will result in a safer, more enjoyable skating experience for the general skating public. It is also our view that the program for funding and building the hockey rink is fair and equitable to both the Hockey Association and the City. The Hockey Association sees the benefit of city tax dollars going toward the purchase of materials for a rink that will benefit their organization. The City benefits by having a contribution of labor provided by the Hockey Association to build a hockey rink that is used not only by the Hockey Association but by the general public. Fourth Street Park hockey rink board replacement yngram summary sheet. FOURTH STREET PARK HOCKEY RINK HOARDS REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Problem: .. Many boards need replacement 2. The rink size is larger than necessary. 3. The general public has no pace to play hockey during Hockey Association practice. 4. Hockey payers use general skating rink, which conflicts with general use—difficult for attendant to control. 5. Winter recreatlon facilities reported to be substandard in 1992 survey (pre -Bridge Park improvements). Facts: 1. Hockey Association practices occupy a targe share of available ice time at Fourth Street Park 2. Hockey Association funded and consinxted existing hockey 11M which is available for use by all citizens. 3. Hockey Association funded constructlon of storage room within warming house. 4. Ice maintenance program is working satisfactorily in 1994-95. Hockey Association floods hockey rink. City removes most snow. Proposed solution: 1. Replace main hockey fink with smaller rink - Cost afld 1311141WICY of use. 2. Develop second seasonal hockey rink at Fouts Street Park. Proposed Budget: COST FUN0e10 (t+ouMr AMMac rMnsoe� M wnil 9e bdMr I from MUM hodw, "It 8D � x1,800 31,600 God OaMn1M MSM MMpar"d b dvrrMd b C7h fr Or MI tam t0 C10D sum" tMrir N" hemi Odd to of Coy Own bold Mrrmeul fbdl tMntloeu, 160 f7.200 � fa.200 (buta6Md in Nov. a rMnMpnd in AOA br C0M) Icimpow" d M Am L7.600 rpl tt I x.600 L. AMa04 ftcalM b iie" mon fw* _ I 160. S37O0I f3106 ITOTA4 COAT 1Mw 7jea Caw tan be nduard .kmt WXWW MMIp N11 r� HOCKEY.WK4: 01/13/95 D Council Agenda - 7/24/95 3a. ZWnng coirnnrebe give sanita= sewer study. (J.O.) A RF.FERF.N .. Ni) RACKGROUND: As you may recall, some months ago Council authorized preparation of a comprehensive sanitary sewer study at the request of Orrin Thompson Homes and developer Tony Emmerich. The need for the study stemmed from the desire of the developers to have a better understanding of whether or not the properties that they wish to develop could be served by sanitary sewer service. Both Emmerich and Orrin Thompson Homes provided a majority of the funds necessary to complete the study, which not only examined issues relating to the Emmerich and Orrin Thompson properties but also includes an analysis of sanitary sewer capacity issues on a larger city-wide basis. The information contained in the study is crucial to obtaining an understanding of where the City can most efficiently extend its boundaries to accommodate land use development pressure and the need to preserve the land for industrial development. Bret Weiss will be making a presentation outlining the results of the study. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS; I. Motion to accept study as presented. 2. Motion to deny acceptance of the study as presented. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends that Council accept the study as presented unless there are questions that require additional study. D. SUPPORTING nATA Copy of the comprehensive sanitary sewer study. Council Agenda - 7/24/95 5a. C. nMderation of as Ll rl�ing a temnoraa gambling license— OL Henry's Catholic, Ch .+rtlh. (Il.W.) As part of the annual Fall Festival, St. Henrys Church has requested approval of a two-day gambling license, September 16 and 17. In order to receive the permit from the State Gambling Control Board, the City must first adopt a resolution indicating the City has no objection to the permit being issued. Adopt the resolution approving the issuance of the temporary two-day license. Do not adopt the resolution supporting the license application. C_ STAIFF RFf 0 NDATION; Since the Church has obtained a temporary license annually, the staff is not aware of any reason why the Council would not support the issuance of the license this year. As a result, it is recommended the resolution be adopted. D_ SLIPPORTINn DATAi Copy of resolution. RESOLUTION 95- RESOLiTfION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A GAMBLING LICENSE WHEREAS, the Church of St. Henry hes submitted an application to the City Council of Monticello for the issuance of a charitable gambling license for September 16 and 17, 1995, as part of their Annual Fall Festival in Monticello, Minnesota, and WHEREAS, upon review of the organizations activities, the Council is not opposed to the gambling liicense being issued by the State Gambling Control Board, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that the Church of St. Henry application for a gambling license listed above is hereby approved, and the State Gambling Control Board is authorized to process the application. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of July, 1995. Mayor City Administrator 544 LG220 ReroersS Minnesota Lawful Gambling Application for Authorization for an Exemption from Lawful Gambling License Organization Information Organization Name �r urrh OF 'i f. NCity enrj/ Name of Chief Executive Officer of organization Q4 First Name Last �Name A HeAu Name Of vrganaauon treasurer o First Name Last Name 5fa Vz �._ Conroy . . Type of Nonprofit Organization For Board Use Only Fee Paid Check 0 Initels Date Recd LPrevWw lawful gambling exemption number &o 19 Se Zip Code County An .553t.Q Wr`� Daytime Phone number of CEO � (61,) 'ags - a,/oa Daytime Phone Number of Treasurer (61.3 Q95 : 340 Check the box below which hest describes Check the box that Indicates the type of proof attached to this application 'ur organization by your organization: [:3 IRS letter Indicating Income tax exempt status Fraternal OCertilieale of good standing from the Minnesota Secretary O Veterans of State's office IDA Charter showing you're an affiliate of a parent ® Religious nonprofit organization Other nonprofit C@Proof previously submitted and on Ole with the Gambling Control Board Gambling Premises Information Name of Estaatshmem where gambling activity will be conducted 14 e 0-t r' Ci,,. It Street City State Zip Code County 50/ - W. qfa 5i . Aojf;,re'Ir✓ 1141 5-s3c.-I Date(s) of activity (for raffles, Indicate the date of the drawing) S.nIrmhr,- A,-/`7 /99< Check the box or boxes which indicate the type of gamblUV activity your organization will be conducting Bingo 12 Raffia (Z Paddlewheels to Pull -tabs C&Mpboards Be sure the Local Unit of Government and the CEO of your organization sign For Board Use Only the reverse side of this applkatton. Due R Initials of Specialist Local Unit of Government Jurisdiction Is this gambling premises located within city limits? El Yes Q No If Yes, write the name of the City: City Name Mn� }_L,lin If No, write the name of the County and the Township: County Name Township Name Check the appropriate status of the Township: C3Drganized dnorganittd []unincorporated Local Unit Of Government Acknowledgment 1. The city must sign this application if the gambling 3. DO NOT submit this application to the Gambling Control premises is within city Emits. Board if it is denied by the local unit of government. 2. The county and township must sign this applica- 4. NOTE: A Toanthip may not deny an application. tion if the gambling premises is ad within city limits Upon submission of this application to the Gambling Control Board, the exemption will be issued not more then 30 days (60 days for cities of the 1st class) from the date the local unit of government signed the application, provided the application Is complete and all necessary information has been received, unless the local unit of government passes a resolution to specifically prohibit the activity. A copy of that resolution must be received by the Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the date filled in below. Giles of the first class have 60 days in which to disallow the activity. City or County Acknowledgment of Receipt of Application S"ro of person rogoving a f kation. Date Received: " 7/11//q(— Title /r5//vrTide of person receiving application Township Acknowledgment of Awareness of Application Signature of p c , acknowledging application Date Signed: Tide of person acknowledging application Oath of Chief Executive Officer I have read the; appkkabon and all information is true, accurate and complete. Date: Submit the application at bast 45 days prior to your scheduled date of activity. Be sure to attach the $25 application fee and a copy of your proof of nonprofit status. Mail tits complete application and attachments to: Gambling Control Board 1711 W. County Rd B Suits 300S Ro"Wle, MN 63113 This publication will be made avatlaDle In alternative format (i.e. large pint, braille) upon request. Questions on MIs faro should be directed to the licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at (512)639.4000. Fearing Impaired Individuals using a TDD may all the Minnesota Relay Service at 1-600.627-3529 in the Greater Minnesota Aron or 297.5353 in the Metro Area. The Information requested on this form will be useMinnesots Ststues and rulesdby the otawfu.Imp0al1rmV Control Board (GCB) to determine your that compliance ply on Iwblic InMtarndlon when received try try � of tine Information 54 C. -F Council Agenda - 7/24/95 A. REFFRFNCR AND BACKGRO TNn: As you recall, a few weeks ago it was reported that the site plan prepared by the Senior Housing Alliance included a small portion of the old Broadway right-of-way. This portion of the Broadway right-of-way to be vacated (approximately 4,900 sq ft) is a vestige of the old road alignment. This portion of Broadway is no longer needed for road right-of-way because the new road (Hart Boulevard) was realigned slightly to the south. In summary, the site plan calls for use of the Broadway right-of-way in conjunction with development of the overall site. The area of Broadway proposed for vacation is of no apparent use to the City. The portion of right-of-way that remains is sufficient for roadway purposes. The only real controversial issue relating to this subject is whether or not the City should sell or give the land away. Recent precedent reveals that the City has not given vacated land away. A few years ago, the City vacated a small strip of land in front of the Monticello Clinic entrance so that the clinic entrance overhang could be constructed. At that time, the selling price was $.67 per square foot. The City also recently sold a portion of the 7th Street right-of-way at a negotiated price. If Council is inclined to sell the property, it is suggested that the price of the land per square foot be roughly equal to a negotiated value of the land. B_ ALTERNATNE ACTIONS: Motion to approve vacation of a portion of Hari Boulevard in conjunction with development of the Mississippi Shores Senior Housing site and provide the land to the development at no cost. It could be argued that the City did not have an expense associated with acquisition of the land, and the land will be used for a low/ moderate income senior housing facility, which is accomplishing a public purpose by providing housing for elderly residents of the community. Perhaps it could be argued that We public purpose is the unique circumstance for justification for providing the land at no charge. Motion to approve the street vacation as proposed and direct staff to negotiate with Presbyterian Homes on the purchase price of the property. Council Agenda - MAM Under this alternative, City staff would sit down with Presbyterian Horses and jointly come up with a fair value for the property. Asa starting point for discussion, vve could base the purchase price on an area of 4,900 sq R using $.87 per sq ft as the value of the lend, which would result in a purchase price of $3,280. C. STAFF RECOIVII MMATION; It is our view that the street right -e --way should be vacated as proposed and that the City should receive some compensation for the property. As of the date of preparation of this memo, we have not had the opportunity to discuss this topic in detail with Presbyterian Homes. It is our view that the easiest way to handle this matter is to sit down with Presbyterian Homes and jointly determine what the fair market value of the property is and establish the amount accordingly. Copy of site plan showing area of Broadway to be vacated. AREA TO BE VACATED FOR MISSISSIPPI SHORES PROJECT / yy lop Al. q. ` 1� � `Qt / • @ ads' � J '�'- \ C ,� •.sem: � s,�ol �'' �� r,'��Gr� \ d � ' �b Vti At Ikea. A, a 91 zF .ip� A/ �4� '`> •►� moi/ �� ,,� :arL W Council Agenda - 7/24186 :, , ., .,, ::., Imexi This is a housekeeping item relating to the Mississippi Shores development. In order for the building to be constructed at the location as proposed, it is necessary to move the sanitary sewer line slightly to the south. In order to complete this aspect of the project, it is necessary for the City to vacate the existing utility and storm drainage easements and obtain new easements following the new sanitary sewer alignment. Notion to approve vacation of utility and drainage easements as proposed. Approval is contingent on City acquisition of easements necessary to accommodate sanitary sewer realignment Notion to deny vacation of utility and drainage easements. C STAFF RECOMMENDATION: staff recommends alternative 01. D_ SUPPORTING DATA: None. Council Agenda - 7/ AM Continuation of nnhlio hearing nn Manlecveed Circle stamm sewer ==led. (J.S.) Staff requests that Council continue this public hearing to the August 14 Council meeting. Council Agenda - 7/24/95 Auditor. (RW., C.S.) The City Council is again asked to adopt an assessment roll for utility billing accounts which are delinquent more than 60 days and to certify the assessment roll to the County Auditor for collection on neat yesr s real estate taxes if not paid by November 30, 1995. The delinquent utility accounts that are included with the agenda are accounts that are at least 60 days past due and include all new delinquents from the last time we certified them. In addition to the delinquent amount, the Council also previously approved the establishment of an administrative fee of $25 per account that is added to each delinquent aFt asment. The amounts shown on the enclosed delinquent utilities list include the additional $26 administration fee for the preparation of the assessment roll. It is recommended that the delinquent accounts be put on an assessment roll for certification in 1996 at an interest rate of 8% as allowed by state statute. As in the past, if any accounts are paid within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll, they can be paid without the additional interest After 30 days, payments will be charged interest and can be accepted up to November 30,1995. 1. Adopt the assessment roll for the delinquent charges as presented. 2. Based on public hearing input, adjust the assessment roll as required r- STAFF 0 F.NDATION: It is staff recommendation that the Council adopt the assessment rofl as presented. All of the accounts are at least 60 days past due and have been given proper notice of this assessment hearing and ample opportunity to pay the accounts in hall. All utility accounts were notified that there would be an additional $25 administrative fee attached to each outstanding balance if the amount was not paid by 4:30 p.m. on July 17,1995. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution adopting assessment roll; Complete listing of delinquent accounts to be certified. RESOLUTION 83 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for delinquent sewer and water billings and other service charges. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the parcels named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in one (1) annual installment payable on or before the first Monday in January 1997 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum fimm the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1896. 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the aseesament on such property with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution. 4. The City Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to the county auditor to be extern on the proper tar list of the county, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of July, 1898. City Administrator 07119/95 11.17.42 OTR 1, 1995 DELO UTILITY BILLING CERTIFICATIONS WITH LATE Qwu PAGE I Amount 1 PID t Property Address APT Custwer Name Cust Aare 2 Ovr30 Day Ovr6D Dav Ovr9O Day Ovr120 Day late iota 4 Past Due Past Due Past Out Past Due Charge W/late Charge 00100240006 155040001010 231 RIVER ST E MIKE BALORIOGE 231 RIVER ST E 81.52 .00 .00 .00 25.00 105.52 0010032000D 155010055040 307 RIVER ST V PATTY POWERS 100,06 .00 .00 DO 25.00 125,06 00100380000 155010055061 1 LOCUST ST TED *SUR 93.64 .00 .00 .00 25.00 118.64 001004500M 155010063040 301 FRONT ST DICK RICE 82.20 .00 .00 .00 25.00 107.20 00100500000 155010056041 9 LIW ST JLKIYOSOWSKI 138.25 .00 .00 .00 25.00 161.25 OOID0520DD0 155010056030 413 RIVER ST W VERY BELLESON $0.16 DO OD .00 25.OD 15.16 00100840000 155010044091 918 RIVER ST W JERRY BARTHEL 26.01 .00 ,OD .00 25.00 53.07 00101760900 155015005150 324 RIVER ST E RCTUID BEGIN 154.55 .DO .00 .00 25.00 179.55 002003301000 155015004010 449 BROADWAY E PETER 8 CHRIS KOAREK 120.44 ,00 .00 .00 25.00 14SAA 00200370 00 155015005010 355 BROADWAY E B -CLEAN LAUNDRY PO BOX 1588 411,40 .03 .00 ,00 25.00 447.40 00200800 00 155010047020 110 VINE ST REED OR KARI DEAMRAIS 122.73 .00 .00 .0D 25.00 147,13 00200930000 155020005111 1011 BROADWAY W SCTDAN DMYTRV?YN 83.14 DO .00 DO 25.00 108.14 0020109CIMI 155010040110 536 BROADWAY V WAYNE BACHLER 12.24 .00 .00 .00 2S.00 37.24 00701410000 155010035080 117 BROADWAY V V7010 PLUS 111 BRO7DWAY W $0.30 .O-0 AD .DO 25.00 75.30 00201630000 155015014160 454 BROADWAY E HERALDO RODRIGUEZ 100.00 .00 .00 .00 25.00 125.00 OD201650000 15501$013080 512 BROADWAY E DIA11A GREENINGER 67.04 .00 AD .00 15.00 97.04 00300160000 155040003010 213 NEW ST TCM BITZER 96.84 .00 .00 .00 25.00 121.84 003003600OD 155010037010 319 3RD ST V CLAFINCE KCARTY 113,51 .00 .00 .00 25,00 130.57 003D0371I000 155010036050 211 LIVI $T DAVID A 1 DEBRA KVISS 68.59 .00 DO .00 25.00 93.59 00300530DOO 15501004 1010 725 3R0 ST V RCBERT BARTNEI 55.87 .00 AD .00 25.00 60.02 0030068CD00 155010027060 303 01MJESOTA ST KEVIN MENTH 111,14 .00 .00 .00 25.00 142.74 OD3008ICBDD 155010030000 318 3RD ST V RCBERT AND YVONNE COI 77159 .00 DO .00 25.00 91.59 00300990000 155010070100 300 3RD ST E GERALD SONSTEBY 41.66 .OD 00 .00 25.00 12.66 00500910000 155015038031 414 WEV ST ROBERT PEDERSON 73.16 .00 .00 .00 75.00 96.16 00500e04000 155010005060 100 6711 7 V DAIRY QUEEN 1151 e061F ST 181.95 .00 .00 .00 25.00 292.94 0060120CD00 1555MV4700 1323 RIVER ST V 5 CVKTHIA BRUSKA 12.74 .00 .00 .00 25.00 37.24 00601220000 155500034200 1323 RIVER ST V 7 C BONNEVILLE 109,40 .00 .00 .00 25.00 133.60 00601250001 155500034200 1323 RIVER IT W 10 FLOYD ANDERSON 9127 tm 25 INE 66.43 .00 AD .00 25.00 91.43 0060130CD00 15SS00034200 1323 RIVER ST V IS B. PEOEIGON B N. CLOCK 99.41 .00 .00 .00 25.00 124.41 00501640DOO 155500031300 31 RIVER TERRACE PARK CCB EASLES 10.40 .00 DO .00 15. DO 35.40 00601656DDO 155500031300 32 RIVER TERRACE PARK DAVE 6 LIMA 6ATENIN 10,40 .GO ,00 .00 25.00 35.40 00601ACDOI 155500031300 35 RIVER TERRACE PARK ED STENCIL 31.20 .00 .00 .00 75.00 56.70 0060179CDM 155500031300 46 RIVER TERRACE PARK KIRK COOS 70.80 .00 AD .00 75.00 45.80 0060101C000 155500031300 40 RIVER TERRACE PARK LEAH CLARK 10.40 .00 .00 .00 75.00 35.40 00601ft"DO 155500031300 53 RIVER TERRACE PARK RAAOLF J SMITH 10.40 .00 .00 .00 25.00 35.40 00607070000 ,55500031300 74 RIVER TERRACE PARK JOHN ICCLANAHAN 31,20 .00 .00 .00 ?$.OD 56.20 00602036000 155021002050 103 KSTTHEW CIO GE9ALD P1AT2 101.27 .OD •00 .00 75.00 126.21 00601876907 155071007010 1606 RIVER ST W RCHAID LAMBERT 82AA .00 .00 .00 25.00 107.44 0010109COC3 155500142401 1305 OAKWOOD 02 E L V E ASSOCIATES 1305 QAKY000 DR 10.40 .OD .00 OO 25.00 35.40 00701090 TOD 155500142601 1305 GUNWLOD OR E L IV ASSOCIATES 1305 CAWOOD, OR 29.39 OD C3 .00 25.00 54.39 G070293CDCO 1555(4113415 119 OAwOOO OR E HOGIU7ND TRANSPORTATION 114.10 .00 .00 .00 2$.00 159.10 00GO014CD00 155041001130 111 KEVIN 1041EY DR DELORES KAISfRLIK OS,G3 .OD .00 .00 75.00 110.06 003CO21C1T00 155041001160 117 JERRY LIEFERT 02 RID0.91) L GRANT2 14,90 .00 .00 .00 25.00 90.90 Ofi000C9C= 155026002010 10 wVIN ELM RD IVAN WALTER $6.49 cO •0D .00 25.00 01.49 0000103=0 ISS0180D3000 123 K%VIN ELWOOD RD JAKE JWAN 110.20 ro OD Do 25.00 135.20 OeC0116CD00 15503107100 144 IRDW:A l4 JEFF JLkJCON $3.79 .0 .03 DD 25.00 70.79 0030121cm 155031002050 127 R4N6,11 fig I.W.A REPnCS 14,33 Cul ,00 .GD 25.0 99.31 + CITY OF MONTICIU0 07/19/95 11.17,42 0115 1, 1995 DELO UTILITY BILLING CERTIFICATIOJS WITH LATE DIUGE PAGE 7 Account 1 PID 1 Property Address APT Customr Name Cust Nage 2 Ovr30 Oar 1-•rr60 Day 0vr90 Day Oyr120 Dar Lata Total 1 Past Due Past Due Past Due Past Due qw,4- +/Late Charge 00801220000 1550310020AC 126 BALBGUL CIR MICHAEL CHANDLER 85.03 .00 .00 .00 25.00 110.03 00803510001 155035004110 229 MARVIN ELWOOD RD MIKE CARTER 73.88 .00 .00 .00 25.00 98.88 00803550000 155035004080 104 CROCUS CIA MICHELLE EBY 10.11 .00 .00 .00 25.00 45.71 00803570000 1$5035004060 107 CROCUS CIR TINA AURIN $7,83 .00 .00 .00 25.00 82.83 00803580000 155035004050 109 CROCIIS CIR B. GDPARJ 8 C. HUDSON 69.84 .OD .00 .00 75.00 94.84 00803600000 155035004030 117 CROCUS LA STEVEN 1U7DWIS1 46.15 .00 .00 .00 25.00 71.75 00803860000 155035003030 226 CROCUS LA RORY WALBERG 75.58 DO .00 .00 25.00 100.58 00803950000 1550350010% 250 MARVIN ELWOOD RU SHAWN RUSSELL $2.37 .00 .00 .00 25. DO 77,37 00804050000 155035001100 230 MARVIN ELM RD DONALD WOOD 61.0 .00 .00 .00 25.00 86.17 00804070000 155035001110 726 KARVIN ELWCK3D RD KATIE LAWRENCE 79.45 .00 .00 .00 75.00 104.45 008061100DO 155035001130 218 IMRVIN ELWr,AO RD CINDY HMLUND 91.59 .00 .00 .00 25.00 116.59 00804240000 155031001070 163 H(DMWJ LA JAMES CELLETTE 127.01 .00 DO 00 25.00 147,01 00804260000 155031004010 135 HEDAWJ LA KENNETH ROSS896 91.31 .00 .00 .00 25.00 116.37 00804410000 155035006010 275 KAI RIE RD DAN CWXER 99.83 .00 DO .00 25.00 174.83 00901620000 ISS033001110 S SAIR;TRAP CIR BILL 8 BEV GRIG'MY 60.)' .00 On .00 25.00 105.37 00901630000 155033001100 7 WTPAP CIR STEPHEN SIEG 5A.0) OD .DO .00 25.00 79.07 00901960000 155033002100 10 EAGLE CIR BEV ROSS 100.14 .00 .00 DO 25.00 125.16 DIOODBCOOOD 155016000050 317 RIVERVIEW DR LIONEL CALLIES 58.06 .00 .00 .00 75.00 93.86 01002600000 155071001060 670 RIVERVIEW OR RICK 8 LORI BLOIBERG 70.0L 10.88 .00 4.38- 25.00 101.54 01002680000 155061002060 9681 63LLARD AVE HE KEVIN 1 PATRICIA FAIR 52.06 .00 .00 .00 15.00 77.06 01103080000 155045002010 2861 RED OAK CIR MICHAEL HARTER 1t1.91 DO .00 .00 25.00 136.91 01103100000 155045007030 2900 RED OAK CIR DAVID R BOETTCHER 90.57 .00 .00 .00 75.00 115.51 01105510000 155045004060 2001 OMIEW LA JACK I KARA HAPFEN 83.57 .00 GO ,00 25.00 108,57 01106680D00 155059002080 2761 ISADOW U DENTS) WILLA.'UR 110.C6 .00 .00 .00 25.00 135.65 01106730000 155045003040 925 MEADOW OAK DR JULI C HEINRIC14 81.52 At .00 AO 25.00 106.52 01200010000 155500154403 20W KJELLBERG'S PARK PAUL CARLSON 10.40 .00 .00 .00 15.00 35.40 01200020000 155500154403 203 KJELLBERG'S PARK HOWARD MEL 70.60 .00 .00 .00 25.00 45.80 0120003GOOD 15550015A403 202 KJELLCEWS PAU SHAN'30H SAYRE 202 KJELLURG'S PARK 20.EO .00 .00 .00 25.DD 45.60 01200090000 155500154403 21 1 KJELLBERG'S PARK PAM RICHWINE 31.10 .00 .00 .00 25.00 $6.20 01700480000 155500154403 113 KJELteb:G'S PAU '.'MANE IAASVIGEN 31.2,) .00 .00 m 25.00 56.70 0120051DO00 155500154403 110 NELLBERG'S PARK A SCHLUPURGER 20.00 .00 .00 .00 25.00 45.80 01200640000 155500154403 3 KJEUGERG'S PARK STEVE I CLARICE WILKIN 31.1.1 Oa .00 .0D 25.00 56.70 01200780000 155500154403 17 KJF.LLBERG'S PARK GAIL M30.ER 31,6.1 00 GO .00 25.00 56.70 01200990000 15$500150403 316 KJELLCEkG'S PARK ALAN I;EPANIER 31.20 .00 .00 .GD 75.00 56,20 01201130000 155500154403 40,+ KJELLOLRG'S PARK SHERNA SINX 31.70 .00 .00 .00 25.00 56.20 01300750000 155073004010 5750 MALLARD LA KEITH EP0K,M1 41,69 .00 .00 .00 15.00 66.19 01307250000 1550700.14050 5340 STASLIQ OR MARCUS LIKOALA 58.14 .00 .00 .00 25.00 01.14 013CMDOO) 15507600)109 5170 FALCON AVE JILL H44WINS 135.20 .CD .00 •00 75.00 160.70 01303040030 155070002160 5524 FALCCN AVE MARK ACRE 70.32 .00 .00 .03 25.00 103.32 01303380003 155069007020 5000 MARTIN OR LA:IRIE WEP 70.09 OD .03 .0 75100 05.08 01103510000 155069001020 $025 MARTIN OR TRACY SWAN_CIJ 55.7 .CD .00 AO 25.00 00.51 00SODSSO100 155010031010 57z� 6TH ST W SO 011-N OLSON 20.87 .00 .00 .00 75.00 45.60 90501660500 155061001030 510 4IGHT ST CHRIS KAAS 10.40 .00 00 .00 25.00 35.40 FINAL TOTALS 1r11A1 0. C:1'Cl 0.38• 2,?S0.OD 0,73.78 COUNT 90 CITY OF KWICEl10 Council Agenda - 7/24/96 lo. Co sideration of rens "City membership in thm Economic Development Partnership ofWmight County, Inc. (RW.) A RFFF.RF.N( F. Tin RA .K(SRO iNn; The marketing committee of the Economic Development Partnership of Wright County, Inc., which includes County Commissioner Judy Rose, will be in attendance at the Council meeting to highlight the activities of the Partnership this past year and to request City of Monticello participation in the future. The City originally approved membership in the Development Partnership in December of 1993 and paid a membership fee of $1,600, of which $600 was contributed by the IDC Committee. At this time, the membership dues remain the same, and the City of Monticello is being asked to contribute membership dues of $1,000 base fee plus $.10 per capita, which would be approximately $1,600 plus. Enclosed with your agenda is a copy of the 1894 annual report for the Partnership and an outline of their 1996 goals. The Partnership is in the process of hiring a parttime staff person, which the organization has agreed to locate in the administration office of the NSP -Monticello Power Plant. The office space is being donated by NSP to the Economic Partnership. At the time the City originally considered membership in the newly -formed Partnership, there were concerns that many of the activities proposed by the Partnership would be duplications of efforts and programs the City currently has. With the City having our own Economic Development Director, many of the programs being proposed by the County Partnership already exist such as establishing revolving loan programs, marketing efforts, and other consulting services we already provide. On the other band, the thought has been that whatever the marketing approaches used by the Partnership are for attracting industry and business to Wright County. Monticello will always be able to hold its own by being an attractive location to locate. Additional concerns were noted last year that the dues structure for membership seems to penalize the larger communities the most, even though we may technically need the assistance the least A question for the marketing representatives could be, 'Why aren't the dues structured on a simple per capita basis or other method that may appear less detrimental to the larger communities.' During the staff a discussion of this item, we were unable to come up with any direct advantages to Monticello or list any specific programs or other forms of assistance that could be provided by the Wright County Partaership Council Agenda - 7/24/95 that isn't already being accomplished by our own economic development department. This would certainly be an appropriate question to ask, "What can you provide to the City that we aren't already doing internally?' At this time, I am not sure of all the communities that have joined in the Economic Partnership and, likewise, this may be a good question to ask the marketing group that attends the Council meeting. Motion to approve continued membership in the Economic Development Partnership of Wright County at an approximate annual coat of $1,550 based on the current due structure for 1995. Motion to approve membership contingent upon the fee structure being revised to equalize the coat on a per capita basis. Motion to deny continued membership in the Economic Development Partnership due to the duplication of efforts already being accomplished through our own economic development programs. C_ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: While I believe the staff believes the programs being initiated by the Partnership are, without a doubt, duplicates of programs and activities we currently provide, I would hate to be the only community not participating in the Partnership for that reason. If the Partnership's goals can provide assistance and attract new industries to Wright County, Monticello certainly stands to benefit as one of the top locations for new businesses to consider. I think the staff does agree that the membership fees do seem unequal in their application, and it may be hard to place an exact dollar amount of our benefit by this membership. As a result, the staff recommends that if the City is going to continue membership, the dues structure should be the same per capita for Monticello as it is for other smaller jurisdictions. If this is agreeable, then the staff would support alternative 02 even though them may be little direct benefit of our membership. Copy of Partnership's 1995 goals; 1994 annual report. Economic Development Partnership of Wright County, Inc. 10 WWPnd5hn7 Buffalo, Minne"ta 35313-7783 S A non•profitovat4ub9c parmarship Phone: (612) 682.7362 ACTION CONIMnTM FOR 1995 Fes. S. Vergin, A. Hendrickson, J. Vrchota MARKETING: D. Lever, J. Bishop, D. Zylsb% D. Lahr MANAGEMENT: C. Montzim, J. Rase, G. Janibtta, C. Rudnicki LIAISON* G. Hale. S. BeraW, O. Koropchak 1995 GOAM/TIIAE TABLES L TIME TABLE dl a. Compose an Annual Report - March 15 b. Su Ping 1. Job Description - Mare 15 2. Office, Support Resources - March 15 3. Budget - March 15 4. Retain - No later than June 1 5. Research Sources for Staff - March IS c. Membership Renewals - March 15 U. TIME TABLE 92 a. Community Profile - 60 days after retaining staff b. Community Visits - on going up to July 15 c. Compilation of Available IFtesouras - 60 days after retalning staff III. TIME TABLE B3 e. Resource Directory - 60 days alter retaining staff b. F h=nee/Rudget -1995 Budget from 1994 monies - April 19 c. loan Program - April 19 d. Conhibutions/Gmnts - April 19 IV. TIME TABLE" a. Annual Meeting - DeeemlNu b. Business Expo - October L996 c. Business Meeting Information Membership - Jan -/Feb. 1996 d. Business Retention Survey 1. Develop - September 1, 1995 2. Mail - December 1, 1995 3. Compile - February 1, 1996 16A Economic Development Partnership of Wri ht Coun Inc. 1ONW2ndSUM 9 ty1 Huffsk, Minnesota 55313.1193 A non-profit privetouNc partnership Phone: (812) 882.7382 MEMBERSHIP DUES DUE BY JUNE 30TH, 1995 PLEASE MAKE PAYABLE TO "ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP" REMIT TO: SUSAN VERGIN, TREASURER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 278, HANOVER, MN 55341 ENTITY DUES WRIGHT COUNTY $ 10 cents per capita MUNICIPALITIES - Under 1000 $ 100.00 plus 10 cents per capita 1000 - 2500 $ 500.00 2500 - 5000 $ 500.00 plus 10 cents per capita Over 5000 $ 1000.00 plus 10 cents per capita TOWNSHIPS $ 100.00 plus 10 cents per capita UTILITY COMPANIES $ 1000.00 plus 10 cents per capita 1ANKS 8 LENDING INSTITUTIONS $ 250.00 (Deposits up to $25 Million) $ 500.00 (Deposita of $25 M to $50 Million) $ 750.00 (Deposits of $50 M to $75 Million) $ 1000.00 (Deposits over $75 Million) HONORARY MEMBER $ 25.00 (Non -Voting - Receives mailings only) ASSOCIATE $ 50.00 (Includes non -business, non-profit, schools and civic organizations) BUSINESS - 1 to 4 Employees $ 75.00 5 to 10 Employees $ 100.00 11 to 20 Employees $ 150.00 21 or More $ 200.00 s Number of employees includes active owners and management and pertains to regular employees (over 20 hours per week). Part-time employees of 20 hours or loco to counted as 1/2 employee. Please find your category and pay accordingly. Per capita rates are to be based on the 1990 census for governmental units. If you have any questions concerning your dues, they may be directed to Sue Vorgin, Treasurer, at (812) 497-3777. If you have already paid your duos, please disregard. THANK YOU Q /O V ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. PARTINERSHIP OF'WRIGHT COU.NTY,-INC., - 2 �• ,• Iv, 's�`., rx�,c .i�q,w ., "}:�tt,�"�.>ty-r: ,.�k.;a.,..�=. ,-; -�w :; �:a��_.,.j',�y , "h..�. Vision To ensure Wright County is a highly desirable place to live, work or own a business. Mission The Economic Development Partnership of Wright County has been created to coordinate, promote, and support economic development which will enhance and improve the quality of life In Wright County. 1994 Major Accomplishments • Completion of a Overall Economic Development Plan (OEDP) • Formation of a Waste/Storm Water Task Force. • Awarded grant money from Central Minnesota Initiative fund for sewer scoping study. • Provided support to townships in response to legislaflon attempting to abolish township status. • Produced a prellminary marketing brochure for Wright County. • Developed a networking relationship with Quad County (Le. Benton, Sherburne. and Stearns counties). • Establlshed a Code of Ethics for Ctty/TownsNp officials. • Fostered a working relationship with Minnesota Deportment of Trade and Development. • Opened a dialogue with Metropolitan Council officials. • Established a relationship with the Central Minnesota Initiative Fund through the appointment of Judie Rose as a board member. • Instituted a formal organization structure and the resolution of Internal and external member Issues. 6 i at Priorities for 1995 1. Establish Action Committees for 1995 A. Finance B. Marketing C. Management D. Government lJolson 2. Design and production of promotional materials 3. Determine staffing requirements for 1995 A. Design Job description by March 15 B. Analize office location/support services by April 15 C. Selection of candidate by June 1 4. Membership drive for 1995 A. Establish meeting schedule by April 15 - 5. Coordinate county -wide community profiles for 1995 impiovinclA. Establish outreach efforts sixty days atter life staff selection r •�� • 6. Initiate business expansion/retention visits A. Organize contacts - 90 days after staff selection 7. Evaluate financial resources for 1995 A. Design a 'Revolving Loan Program' B. Coordinate meeting for membership by January. 1996 9. Organize a county -wide business survey for 1995/96 A. Design - September/October. 1995 B. Moll - December 1995 or before +: C. Tabulatlon - February. 1996 Membmhip The Economic Development Parfnershtp of Wright County was created in 1993. Current Board members are volunteers and contribute from a wide variety of Interests and backgrounds. The membership Includes representation from the county. several municipalities and townships. as well as various at- large members. Name Reprettenflng Arne Hendrickson Mnnegasco Carl Mont ka Wright Technical Center Chrlsttne Rudnicld Private industry Council Darrin Lahr Northern States Power Dave Zyisfra Silver Creek Township Don Levens Cokato Garrison Hale Albertville Gene Jannndo Woodland Townstdp James Vrchota State Bank Of Maple Lake John Blshop Lakedale Telephone Judle Rose County Commissioner Nen McMillin Wright Hennepin Electric Co-op 011ie Koropchok Monticeib > S xM Beming Frankfort Township = ." Susan Vergin Hanover A f, r' + t This roport oat producod by a Wright County brdnom. Council Agenda - 7/24195 'll ;rrT-.N M 1 1 A- REFRRENrP AND RACKC OIJNn: Members of the volunteer fire department will be in attendance at the meeting to request that the City Council consider an increase in their retirement benefit from the present $1,300 per year of service to $1,325 per year. This is the benefit that is payable in a lump sum after 20 years of service on the fire department. The Relief Association's last increase was granted in August of 1994 to the present $1,300 per year amount. In 1992, the benefit was increased to $1,226 per year; in 1990, the increase was to $1,176 per year, in 1989,$1,075 per year, in 1988, the increase was to $975 per year, in 1987, it went to $875 per year. By August 1 of each year, the Relief Association must present to the City Council a schedule of the proposed benefits and total liabilities associated with the proposed benefit in comparison to the assets of the Association. Typically, it has been the past policy of the Council that they would only consider increases to occur in the yearly pension amounts if the Association had sufficient income projected to cover the increase. In other words, the state aid and intereat earnings on investments are projected to be sufficient to cover the normal annual cost of the pension calculations based on a $1,325 per year amount. It would not require any contribution from the City as a tax levy to support this amount. It should be pointed out that the reason the City Council must approve any increase in the Reliefs pension is that, ultimately, if the projected revenue is not sufficient to cover the pension liability, the City is liable for the difference. Although interest earnings should be relatively stable and state aid is projected at the same amount received the previous year, the City does not have any control over a bad investment market ar if the State decides to cut back on the aid. A few years ago, the City did receive less state aid than we had originally expected because of tho way the formula had changed in determining our aid amount, which required the City to kick in $691. This is the only time that I can remember the City participating in the Relief pension amounts; but the Council should be aware that there are no guarantees that state aid or other interest earnings will always bo sufficient based on projections. The only way to be entirely sure of no municipal support is only to allow the Association to increase benefits when their assets 13 Council Agenda - 7/24/95 exceed their liabilities. Right now, their assets are approximately $310,00, but their liabilities would exceed $381,000 at the current $1,300 per year amount; therefore, they would need Council approval to increase their benefits. B. ALTFRNATiVE ACTIONS; 1. Grant an increase to $1,325 per year/$26,500. This increase, according to the Relief Association's schedule, would not require a City contribution and should be able to be funded through anticipated state aids and other interest earnings on investments, although there is not a guarantee. 2. Do not grant an increase in benefits at this time and only allow an increase to occur when the Association has more assets than liabilities. At this time, it is projected that it would take a number of years yet before the Association could increase the benefits on their own without Council approval. While the projections do not show a large surplus of revenue over what is needed to sustain a $1,325 benefit, these calculations are normally sufficient to handle the increase proposed unless state aids are cut for some reason. STAFF F..O F.NDATION: Again, it appears that the Relief Association financial computations do allow for the pension amount to be increased to $1,325 per year without requiring a City contribution. Anything over this amount would more than likely require a City tax levy to support. Based on this information. I have no objection to the increase being granted as long as the City Council realizes them are no guarantees that state aid or investment earnings will continue at the present level. If state aids are cut or the Relief Association's investments turn sour, the City Council would have to make up the lost revenuo via tax levy. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Computation of benefits for each member at the $1,326 per year level of service. SCIILDUL,E 1-11 FOR LUMP SUM PENSION PLANS STATE FIRE AID YEAR 1996 I•ireGshters Relief Association of Monticello County of Wright SCiIEDULE I _amputation of benefit of relief association special fund (alS1325 per year of service) for all members based on lbebyeare of service as active foe department members. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1995 1996 I F.D. To End of Tbb Year To End of Ne11 Year Name Abe j Entry D.te Yea. Adlve Aeaaed Years Asha Awned 'Moa Year Service LiaHtity Servim liability T. Farnam 48 1 3 73 23 30.475 I 24 31 .800 • 2. M. Flicker 47 5 75 21 27,825 I 22 29,150 3. J. Morrell 52 5 75 21 27,825 I 22 29.150 I 4. e, Douglas 44 3 76' 20 26.500 I 21 27.825 M. LeBree 39 5 77 19 24,433 I 20 26,500 iS. 6- M. Wallen _90._I 5 77 19 24,433 20 26.50(1 7. G. Dahlheimer 44 2 78 18 22,499 19 24,133 S. J, Wain I 42 12 70 17 20.670 I 18 22.199 I 19, M. Johnson 38 3 81 15 17,278 I 16 18,921 10. M. Theisen 38 5 82 14 15.688 I 15 17.728 111. T. Liefert ' 36 I 11 83 12 12,747 I 13 14,178 '2. B. Pyle 37 I 5 84 12 12.747 I 13 14.178 ..1, K. Stump! 35 I 5 I 135 11 11,369 I 12 12,747 i14. G. Host 133 I 10 I 85 10 10.070 I 11 11.369 15. T. Bromor 32 I 12 I 85 10 10,070 I 11 11,369 i Total from Pate 2 1 I I I I I I •• DEFERRED I I I Total of Deferred Pensbm, It Amy, Total from pane 2 i 'foul Unpaid Insultments, If Any, Total fromeaee 2 1'otalof Early Vested Pembm 11 Any, Total from pale 2 i A. Accrued Liability Throutts Nest Year 19%Itoul,calaam7) ------------------------------i_-----, 100,101 i 11. Accrued Liabilty Tbrou6b Mb Year 1995Iloul,columns) ---_--------_----__—� 362,209 -----� C. Subt.et Line 0 from u°°�► lgoreul�s _ 37,892 Fmctioeal Years of terAw mat be calculated to unwed full year. Do not eater liability in Columna Set 7 for any pe.oe abo %Q reoeWe entire persWas duriq thb year. Fater this pemloa amount on Schedule 11, Section 1, Line b. For instathmot liability, enter strtount which will be payable after end of this ycor fa both column S and column 7. If interest is to be ppaald on unpald pemiom, add Interest low I yen to column 7 A copy of these scheduka mom be presented to the CNryCouadl before August 1 oath year. pap I //A NClll?UUIJ? I - AUUI I IUNALMLMM.RS 80bt'td of Redy Vested Pensions 1995 1996 I F.D. To Fad of This Yen To End -f Next Year I Name Age I t to Yeas Active Accrued Yews Active Accrued IMaoth Year % vi_ra+ tia_bility Service Liability Regular Pensions I. M. Simpson 39 1 87 9 8,825 10 10,070 1 2. L. Larsen 34 1 87 9 8,825 10 10,970 3. N. Kranz 28 587 9 8,825 10 10,070 4. S. Samuelson 31 11 87 8 7,632 9 8,825 s. B. St=Df 32 7 88 76.519 B 7.632 6. B. Cyr 31 1 90 6 5,433 , 7 6,519 7. J. Michaelis 31 1 90 1 6 I 5,433 7 6,519 8. G. Sonstebv 30 5 1 93 I 3 i 2.518 4 3,445 9. R. Lymer 31 5 193 1 3 1 2,518 4 3,445 110. J. Kranz 31 1 5 193 I 3 1 2,518 4 3,445 111. J. Johnson 29 1 5 193 I 3 I 2.518 4 3,445 :12. S. Joerg 31 1 10 I 94 I 1 1 795 2 1,643 13. P. Drew 30 10 I 94 1 1 1 795 2 1,643 -14. R. Vollbrecht 39 1 190 I 5 I 4,426 6 5,433 1s. (7 mos. in -94) I I I •16. I I I 117. I I I I Ire. I I I 119. I I I !2o. I I 121. I I I I I I I 124. I I I Spbtotal of Regdla�ettslon Ihb811y separsuco Accrued Aarued Name An EniryDate fate tiab8ity Llab8ltt Deferred Pennines 1. '2. 15. 4. L,%-Kot-aLo LLe(e.M*dL?.enslons Unpaid lostatltnents ,1. 2. ��Lb!44a1 n� uPPN4 i�tldltAQPv .. _ . Earls Vested Pensions 1. 2. 80bt'td of Redy Vested Pensions Schedule H Section 1 Determination of Projected Net Asseu for the year ending December 31, 1993 pecial Fuad Assets at December .11, 1994 IS 309.566 (See Ending Assets in Reporting Form — 1994) Projected Income to December 31. 1993 a. Minnesota State Aid f 31.129 (Use 1994 amount, exclude supplemental) b. Municipal (independent fire) Contributions f -- c. Donations (List ) f d. Investment Income f 15.478 c. Realized Galas (losses) f -- r. Unrealized Gains (losses) f -- g. Other income (Includes Supplemental) f 1.000 (List — 1 Total 2S 47.607 Projected Assets plus Income December 31,1993 (line I a line 2) 3S 357,173 Projected Disbursements through end of year It. Pensions f 33,787 L Other benefits f 1.100 j. Administrative f 11300 Total 4S 36,187 Projected Assets as end of year (line 3 minus Hoe 1) SS 320,986 Section 2 Determination of Projected Surplus (Def cil) a of Deeember31, 1495 Projected Assets (fine 5) 63 370,986 Accrued UabWty (Una S, Schedule 1) 7S 362.209 Surplus (deWl) (Subtract Una 7 from Ilse 6) B f (41,223) • Oo to Section 1 U Surplus ' Go to Section 4 U Deficit Section 3 Duetermfn don of Munretya/ Contribution (if Surplus) Normal Cost (Lina C. Scbedule 1) 911 Calculated Administrative Etpeose (1994 Reporting Form Adm. Esp. f x 1.033) 10 f Less: k. Minnesota State Aid f 1. 396 of Una 3 f M. 10% of Una g f Total Subtractions I1 f Municipal Contribution (tine 9, plus 10 minus I I) 12S If $1.00 or greater, eertUy to muekdpailty before August 1,199!, 11 negative number, no contribution h due. GO TO SECTION 1 Pug.' // V Section 4 Determination of Munic4vl Contribution (if Deficil) Amortimtioa of Defeats. Okulation of Aterago g7cda/ fund planate per membra +D+C Year tncuned Column I Column 2 Column 3 A D C D %nam It"" to Prix Amount ten to Original Amount Ym. Retire I19�g 23.896 17,554 6,342 I19M 16,419 9,852 6,567 I19 -L0 10,570 5,285 5,285 Total Column a divided by 3 19-2d 25.803 5.160 20.643y m.41, 223 (section 2, line 8) 3.206 Muhmum 1lnnlon Benefit under Subtotal 0.38,837 (Column 3 Subtotal) rr-. rads n.&M (7) 2,386 2,386 p. 2,386 (s. minus o.) ITotab 79,074 37,851 41,223 2,386 Step M I If tine p _ positive, enter Use p In co umm I and 3 of New additional Deficit (9") line. (Ibis is your New additional Deficit for 1995.) Paget 4 Stcp # 2 If Unc p is negative, reduce columm 2 and 3 according to Deficit Reduction in the instructions, page 6. Amortization of Deficit (rotal from Column 1 79,074 a.to) 131 7,907 Total from line C. Schedule 1, Normal Cost 14S37,892 Cakvlated Administrathe Expense (1994 Reporting Form Adm. Exp. 1, 258 a 1.035) ISS 1,302 Subtotal Una 13+14+15 16S47.101 Lm: q. Minnesota State Aid S 31.129 r. 5% of Unna 5 S 16,049 Total Subtractions (subtotal of L mrd q and r) 17347,178 Municipal Contribution (line 16 mirm line 17) I8S (77) (If 0 or neaatite, them B no mank4mi aoatrlbsdon) You must certify to maeichaallty before Aatust 1. 1995, nen if no contribution Is doe. Section S Okulation of Aterago g7cda/ fund planate per membra +D+C D A D C D D State Municipal to% of Acthe Aid Support Sum ho Member Average Int year 1994 31,129 --- --- 30 1,038 2 resn ago 1993 29.382 28 1.049 3 reap ago 1992 29.006 26 1.119 Total Column a divided by 3 p, d 1.069 1 3.206 Muhmum 1lnnlon Benefit under O. atatuta S 1, 9000I t foot up the roult of F on the table (page 7 of the hwrortlont) to obtain O. 1 Tbb b your atatdmum benefit lbb year. You cannot inseam benefits beyond this aarootl. Paget 4 116 OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION (Form must be provided to maak#al clerk on or before August 1, 1995) W *be ofirars of the Firefighters Relief Association, state that the accompanying scl ala have been prepared in accordance with the provisions of Mian. Stat. 169.712, subd 4. 7be average amount of available financing per member of the special fund for the past three years bf Further, benefit leveh have been established in accordance with the average amount of available financing, as is required by Minnesota law. We certify that the financial requirements of the relief association special fund for 19% purposes of required municipal contribution is S Signature of President Date Signature of Secretary Date Signature of Reasmer Date CLERK'S CERTIFICATION t I am the clerk of 1 have realved the completed Office of State Auditor Schedule1 R 11 from Relief Association on 1993. 1 have reviewed Section $ Ilse 8, 12 and 18 of Schedule 11. If line 12 or 18 reflects a required municipal contribution, I mrtify that 1 will advise the goversiag municipal body at it's no=t regularly scheduled meeting. Ir the CertlOcation of the Of imps disclma that the By -taws have been amended or benefits have increased and line 1I or 18 reflect a required municipal contribution, I certify that the governing municipal board passed a resolutioa approving of the increase of change in by-laws. I have attached the Board resolution, if required. Date Sipaturo of Clerk Bud" Phone WAFNNG 7hb dwpmeat mgr be IWb cmtpioad ceMad by W pelted mods" of/kers offeLf d ty I& amt 4 ckrtad fibd Nib the phx of Sate Audi— repatky fain w mquked by Mkm. Sar. I0.777, quad A Fiume to fab fhb dsmoent. stetha or as a artmfriprl ama@mloe n der. sip mreb M hw4o Nfky d nares 1IN cid as roQad by Mlwwr ads nam b. Page S //F, Council Agenda - 7/24/95 12. Review of HDR te^hni ,cl m aemorandum on wastewater treatment . O.S.) As part of the addendum to the Facilities Plan, HDR is reviewing the technical data provided in the plan. They have gone over the growth projections of the community in which we are projecting 75 single family and 26 multiple family unit starts per year for a total of 101 unite. We are anticipating that institutional and commercial growth continues at the same rate as residential growth and that Sunny Fresh Foods reaches their maximum allowable permit per flow of 160,000 gallons per day and expands an additional 25% over the next 25 years. In addition, we have allowed for the growth of additional dry industry. While going over the projections given in the Facilities Plan, HDR and City staff are of the opinion that the numbers given are somewhat conservative, and there may be a little excess capacity built into the proposed facility in regard to flow and BOD. We do not feel any changes in the design capacity of the plant should be made for the analysis of the additional alternatives for a sequencing batch reactor and oxidation ditch. Any changes made at this time would make our comparisons to the original alternatives in the Facilities Plan slightly skewed. If we do make any changes in down -sizing the plant slightly, we would look at that during the actual design process. Enclosed you will find a copy of technical memorandum 01, regarding flows and loads for the treatment plant as prepared by HDR. Please review this document and compare it with your copy of the Facilities Plan if you wish. If the Council is comfortable that the memorandum reflects the current available data regarding the projected growth of the community and loads to the treatment plant, we can move forward with an evaluation of the two additional alternatives. The first alternative after review of the technical memorandum is to accept it and authorize HDR to proceed based upon the information in the memorandum. The second alternative would be to make some modifications in regard to the technical memorandum either in regard to projected growth of the community and/or loads to the treatment plant. Council Agenda - 7/24(95 L STAFF RCO NDATIO14: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council swept the technical memorandum as drafted. In discussing the data with other staff members, we feel it reflects the information discussed with the Council at the previous workshops and is still the best growth Projections we can make based upon available data Copy of technical memorandum from HDR. Iii t RAPT City of Monticello From HDR Engineering, Inc. Data July 17, 1995 Subject Technical Memorandum No. l Flows and Loads 1.0 CURRENT TREATMENT PLANT LOADINGS 1.1 Treatment Plant Operating Data Wastewater treatment plant operating data from May 1993 to May 1995 was used to assess current treatment plant loadings. This data, which is summarized in Table 1, represents composite averaged of domestic, industrial (wet and dry), commercial, and institutional sources. As seen in the Table, wastewater flows averaged 0.657 MGD, with a peak day flow of 1.093 MGD. Average monthly influent biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) loadings were 1,677 Ib/day, with an average peak day loading of 2,994 lb/day. The average monthly influent total suspended solids (TSS) loading was 1,261 Ib/day, with an average peak day loading of 2,655 Ib/d. Monitoring of influent total phosphorus (TP) was conducted from June through October, 1994. Based on this monitoring, the average monthly influent TP loading was 6.51 Ib/day, with an average peak day loading of 7.59 Ib/d. The treatment plant data was used to calculate per capita loadings for flow, BOD, TSS, and TP as shown in Table 1. Per capita values shown represent the entire flow and loads (domestic plus wet and dry industrial, commercial, and institutional) divided by the total 1995 sewered population (estimated at 4,920). Average per capita loadings were calculated as 134 gaVcap/day for flow, and 0.34 Ib/cap/day, 0.26 Ib/cap/day, and 0.007 lb/cap/day for BOD, TSS, and TP, respectively. These current per capita loadings were used to check future flow and load projections against actual loadings. 2.0 GROWTH PROJECTIONS Growth projections have been based on data summarized in the April, 1995 Wastewater Facilities Planning Report, prepared by Orr•Schelen•Mayeron dt Associates, inc., and Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc.. and the May. 1995 draft Comprehensive .Sanitary, Cew•er ,Ludy, prepared by Orr•Schelen•Mayeron & Associates, inc., plus additional information by City of Monticello staff. /t4 F Table 1 Operating Data May 1993 -May 199S Monticello, MN T.O7M�1 W1nvW>t.1tt W 1 N 0� 4117 Irl 1K1111p FI-• cow !u!a cow 6,12t.r 7.6 •M its Sam- led 76 41001x1 6001ed' T•9 e lee6 ns 1a A 1.eM A..W aa. •+•P am O ro A•1.99. No AMW m A -W m wVan 1•W'M•• GWm ;, 1 paa9 1KM9 a10em = no mad 11111.moll CxmL m0. ma. mm 61f� 0x1 ma mel mad Mo W mel mm morn 0138 O./r 27a no 17 27 716 1H 1 10 1.6.1 7.171 122 7A01 A143 Ono I.t7a1 760 283 11 20 109 IM 1. 71 1,W 1.030 1.00• am AM 0102 O,MI 72D 7157 1 1 179 711 7 17 1,711 I,In t.0.! 1.2! hg11 0110 0701 no Wa a 11 719 m 6 1 1A37 2.175 1,700 7570 own aaa3 0701 111 107 • / 707 QO • 10 1,777 am: 1,10! 2.» 00G OW 06] 77. 280 • 17 249 W • 11 1,7.1 3,161 ::;,to 7511 16.47 amt cow Ma MO • • 719 103 a 11 1,728 7,111 1,170 1.10 0•M3 a02 0607 380 .00 1 1 2M 7r 1 10 1,m 7.11. 1.707 1177 j-"1176 0 a 217 412 11 ,1 1r Ir N A 1.011 1W I.On 1.281 Fek 0287 0703 Ms 125 7 1 291 116 17 24 1.777 1./38 1,30 7138 U..M and 0611 707 Us 10 27 701 110 2. A 2,ar e,ore 1,677 7,28! A." 0670 On7 222 039 10 n 1" 728 10 I/ Iall 3m 1,176 7,.03 MRM 07.7 aan 717 702 • 1 191 176 • 17 I.M! 1311 t.128 7.177 daM 0aQ 0101 703 .150 a 11 717 28e • 6 0m 672 1,616 7..01 1,137 7.m 1./ MI LM 0023 0701 271 100 17 16 7.7 IH I/ 22 610 71• 1,777 1.11. 1,•m 1rJ 110 .0/ =AyM 000 07r 706 770 7 1 1M 7C 6 / Oa r.0 1.617 7.3m 1.,A I.nO 387 .75 W 1107 0711 1W 100 10 11 761 lm a I. Op 723 IAN 2.270 %.28 7.070 210 w.l 00" 6036 oar .26 166 10 1. 706 176 • I/ •.n.277 •.1M 1.111 t,1e7 ]70 •17 M9.M Ills OGI 70• W 0 17 IM 727 / 1 IZ 2,003 1.077 I,W6 Wow 0070 Dan 381 6*3 10 10 797 /M 17 17 1A1/ 7.W 1,711 11W 1-14 66aa OM1 lee me 2. 29 234 720 2. n I,d 1,237 1,no 1,713. Fbp IWO aOl7 103 1" 70 r 1M 716 1• 0 1,161 7.016 =2 1,729 •1ra3 0039 0= 38. 110 17 11 201 7a 10 12 ,All 2..03 t, 171 2.176 Apo! 0C31 0 P. 1M 139 a 17 20 W 6 10 I,CM 702• 1,.11 7.7! !•r1M OlA7 0 _ .0.1 Aw1O] �%Y 7 10 / 16 776 T11� .W .1/1 ! i1 tl 11 J eJ 1al 1 tl7� 7MO 2.•M 1.716 11-61 2031 !u! 161 .! 1 � 7 03. 050 OW .t -" 134 V -W 1k.0 1Um 1005 A•1G>01 on T.O7M�1 W1nvW>t.1tt W 1 N 0� 4117 Irl 1K1111p 2.1 Domestic Growth From housing start information provided by the City, domestic growth has been assumed to occur at uniform rate of 100.5 housing starts per year over the course of the planning period (1995 to 2020). Population growth has been projected based on the Monticello's current population density of 2.7 capita per home. In addition, the City anticipates the addition of 780 residents currently served by onsite systems. Based on these assumptions, the total population served by the City sewer system is projected to increase from a current population of 4,920 to approximately 12,484 by the year 2020. The Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Study has projected that the City of Monticello will have an ultimate build -out population of 21,973, based on current zoning and housing densities. 2.2 Wet Industry Growth The City of Monticello currently has one large wet industry (Sunnyfresh Foods). While most future industrial growth is anticipated to be "dry" industry, the Wastewater Facilities Planning Report projected a 25 percent increase in flow and a 50% increase in load from wet industry during the course of the planning period (1995 to 2020). 2.3 Dry Industry Growth The Wastewater Facilities Planning Repnrt indicates that there is currently 150 square feet of dry industrial facilities per capita Future dry industrial growth is assumed to occur at this same rate, proportional to population increases. Based on domestic growth projections, dry industrial facilities are projected to increase from a current area of 17 acres to 43 acres by the year 2020. 3.0 PROJECTED FLOWS AND LOADS Projected flows and loads aro summarized in Tables 2A and 2B. 3.1 Domestic Flow and Loads Average domestic flows were based on an the City's estimated sewer flow of 115 gal/cap/day. This includes domestic plus institutional and commercial flows, but does not include wet or dry industrial flows, which are accounted for separately. Treatment plant operating data was used in the Wastewater Facilities Planning Report to determine peak hourly wet weather flow and peak instantaneous wet weather flows. The resulting peaking factors are summarized in Table 3: Technical Memorandum No. 1 3 Monticello, MN I2 C-0 Table 2-A Projected Flows and Loads Monticello, MN ra.• 1 }, w w....a,t � �.: , imam w �.er• . c•. ea0ro el] ee[� •,Tv Ta (� r!n NJ I � �m dfGY Ime 4i n.'It� 0 T eNt� YYM.eaA' } w r� lb. b D Da a� eoo 9��. �.. D�•Mb10 ,.I.e.R Cvw•s wear iv, O+I OD e00 II+IE a+m W DOB R4lMM re OM •6w DoreDltc 0n r nalYr r eao m r0D nm e..r 0.e JOII e•F Jr orrr JMI are n1111,1 o..r. Ilrr o..r oa.•.. Dr.r me.r or.m 0....IY w y w•r co w r1Y•.a e..r u..Y.a rr.a ti ti IIn ra lO. om I.•a rm W n I.r err) Im n•.or rr lnl n] }r e» 1nlllre Nre� hrmL Io0 � Im 1100 11® oW lem rElo rr Ilaey 60 er wJ o .m nm on er an lm �n un .m < Tr vl I+e eN :nn Tim iq wr Ian lm! IeD I•m em 00 00 on 1N en �r +r iN �n i1T Tan lltl +m •T ne m m » IN en TFn Tm �q lm! IIY m ol• an on ee oa T+• T]m Tm v m •n nr nw +q mm +m! Ime Irm lm) Im rmT on an on or +m �m Tm rle Ta Tn r)n Tar r)n r•n m Tm a a] •n ou on ].n Tai mm mn lml rso +mJ nrl on eon lm .m la ]n r.0 }u }a IaT ]nT ran ]m m a >r m cn e]v In eu ]v ]wl IDr rrm! lmf rID n•r ul. 0Y an 10 n] lw in }r ]r Tn In IPl nn ]ea ]eR r a w) a re ec] ISI o+e TW T10 ran .ms rm Ire lm �n ]o TD InJ Jou n � eie Tar IDn ItN Im 1m 1>D In Tr Jln n Jn ® On Iml TOm rme a:! IW IL'1 �ml Ino Ir0 .m la In 10 Tn To Im nT uN ]TO lm N n ]O en � ao e�1 ne ]m To+o IeU Irq �n �u ]r Ia 147 n aT r, ore }n1 ral m In aol0 �m Jm Im vu Jen .T+ w I�0 ]a NU U!e• �a +e� �:� Te icm ]ra a ..D •n cu Tm m+• �m� room mese �n to +la )n wn Ir n m nt em Trm nle m+1 lml awl nro lml nen iia �a �n la �m �m �n Jv ).r to n] nv ITS] Ja Tel m v o rl .� rm ero no }o rar y+r +me am nen iw lr Jr .ve •ml w u] rm em ]m me rpNime .ml ��m niq nr). IIW lu +.• lm In �n In JRI .n __ .wo •rn ,n o In em .n___ as Ix] p?•r ]o _1_'^� � "14u•ee nni --- -- �� a> on o® oro omT ew Lr.•ee111•r .nrygl N_ r n IA lnl ue•.rr •ee lti mlw •r.s.we wor «..r . d W DOB R4lMM re OM •6w o.e r 0n r nalYr r eao m r0D nm am ew a Ne. elaa am om sm lm our nu � is +1 a em 001 ooe m Pl ry +r AO ae a a 0m rm w +rr n om om m rm m rd n n om a• Tre lnl n] a o+0 ne b a m a 010 010 m )10 � b ilN O v O1+ Olt ol. ID al lm w n ou 0+T m s n] >m �� a1T •n av i� W n n an O1) •m •T u 01. ol• 01• a. m m m �m a oro m on oa or ra Jr n v Table 2-B Projected Flows and Loads Monticello, MN IMOUETg1LL nK1 N I1rY1, TOT4 DOYP.fT1G I1YO IM]US)RY\l IYM •r,0 Onl •Z r •w •r•••Y •MY G:Or� w . prr •DIe M r •••rl w•ar •ur w . or w . o] w • wJ w. oa w • of pcD ru r • of r . ➢. r • op d.� war o..r s� orar w,Yr war o.•or o.o � rb^ •raY I•r�a• �r n� r nmoo M1. W A rn Id r[Y W aDo l� it l� A tW IrO I•a r•M W TW pYm J.r• •.rD. rrr�+. II® IOD •IDD 1100 ➢DD Oqp r➢n Yb rb ar1•l q0D JIDD 1Dlo ruD � ren 1e � req r10 .p0 •� OII Oa OD Or OC )rn •]n xn On pr xr ]1• ab, l® rre oa as as pY am •m m on xr x). !m} rm\ \m \I�a pa oA o➢ e« an I,m mo pu e« )n n m err \.a ea an oa ar )m n m .a rm n>r ]n �m n Imp \n, rr m ai. oa on pr oA xo (� n. o os Ir tY lIm w �n w rm\ •me ono as pa on on ]m rm r]o !n .eo mm rm] \m tas ea o0 on >m1 a :c in un io ori \u AOr rm\ •M Ob Ofr 00 r1n Y O rA iU lr• \a• » r7• OA O➢ Oq On al •n to rr 1.11 •ar JM me Oil O11 Orr Orr ieo rtn m V l� \r] rII st m rmf rn us] en ea ei on ]e. .r ur vu m or rm oD en oar en )ra m] ra Im In im f� ro m ��e oa en on o➢ ]m .m Y m Io Jr 1r fou .v xmr m� nw oa pn ea ou t•. n la c.• .n !n .m rm .rr )D]• �m oa tea a •n �m m .o ]m •m0 On OA On rb •tl A r•n At0 m• •rA On On 00 Or }r1 .Or Iin IU •m] w roaJ pm oa ou on1 ao !m ict a yr in Im ger ami nw m IDI] •]D IOIr) 0]I e➢ 0•, Jrr fy rb 1\r •n \A] ry All m• On •Jr OU OM lItl L rU rn tm •lr rm• \•a ArJ Imf IOOn rOb On OP OV 00 OU 110 0• .O r@ xr .• rm \lD •n rOYr 0•r OU rA1 D xn •a •Y IL] ¢➢ r W ]Or• On OY !dr rY1 Jn O }rr ••a Art ,e\m 1•A On 00 Oa !11 )pl n m mr rr rA t3 •n •o• en m• «� oJy. 00 oe co on la ]oY to .r rm �a. rma nan mow) ea eo o➢ ):n n am .n em ]n rw mr rn,me nrs u•r nal __ n��_�a� _i a_ _ cv In rer p� ul •e 1n ••n m �__. l �w..Yw pa fn omJ pm) por eo �cRw..r.,•M_ Inr n r .• r pro en \n .oY ••.4aY....rs •wY •.o,ra w,w Ja ti run w. w.w J•a. r w .�.ra.w.+•.ww ry Table 3 Flow Peaking Factors Ratio Monticello WWTP Average Annual/ADW 1.16 AWW/ADW 1.32 PHWW/ADW 2.65 PIWW/ADW 2.85 PHWW/Average Antral 2.28 Notes: 1. ADW is the average dry weather flow, calculated at 115 gal/capiday. 2. Average Annual flow is based on 1993 to 1995 average monthly flows summarized in Table 1. 3. A W W is the average wet weather flow based on the average of 1993 to 1995 peak flows. 4. PHW W is the peak hourly wet weather flow based on data summarized in the Wastewater Facilities Planning Report. 5. PIWW is the peak instantaneous wet weather flow based on data summarized in the Wastewater Facilities Planning Report, The Ten States Standards peaking formula, projects a ratio of peak hourly wet weather to overage -- annual (average design flow) of 3.25 for a popubWon of 4,920, decreasing to a ratio of 2.86 for a population of 12,484. The calculated ratio based on present flows for the City of Monticello is 2.28. Actual ratios have been used to project flows. Infiltration and inflow (14) was analyzed in the Wastewater Facilities Planning Report, and was not found to be excessive. The City currently has an ongoing UI reduction program. Peak domestic BOD and TSS loadings were projected using the per capita values of 0.37 Ib/cap/day and 0.35 Ib/cap/day which were derived in the Wastewater Facilities Planning Report from treatment plant operating data from 1991 through 1993. These per capita values are slightly higher than the average values calculated in Table I from 1993 through 1995 operating data (0.34 and 0.26 Ib/c*day, respectively), and therefore, thould result in conservative load projections. Resulting BOD and TSS loads in the year 2020 (based on a population of 12,484) are 4,619 Ib/day and 4,369 Ib/day. Technical Memorandum No. 1 6 Monticello, MN 1 ?, 3.2 Wet Industry Flow and Loads Wet industrial flows and loads were based on the current pretreatment agreement between the City of Monticello and Sunnyfresh Foods, which allows a maximum daily discharge of 160,000 gal/day, 2,000 Ibdday of BOD, and 1,100 Ib/day of TSS. Based on the projected 25 percent increase in flow and 50 percent increase in load summarized in the Wastewater Facilities Planning Report, fume flows and loads are estimated at 200,000 gal/day, 3,000 lb/day of BOD and 1,650 lb/day of TSS. 3.3 Dry Industry Flows and Loads Dry industry flows were projected to increase to a maximum of 150,000 gal/day by the year 2,020 as indicated in the Wastewater Facilities Planning Report. Based on current dry industrial flows, this appears to be a conservative projection. Wastewater flows were assumed to occur at the current concentrations, with resulting BOD and TSS loads of 483 Ib/day and 456 Ib/day. 3.4 Nutrients The wastewater treatment plant operating data summarized in Table I was used to calculate the ratio of phosphorus to BOD in the City's current wastewater stream. This TP/BOD ratio of 0.022 Ib/lb was used to project a TP load of 177 Ib/day for the year 2020, based on a design BOD loading of 8,102 lb/day. Monitoring dam for influent total Kjeldahl nitrogen (IXM and ammonia is not available. A standard wastewater reference, Wastewater Engineering, Treatment/Dbposal/Retuse, Metcalf & Eddy, 1991, was used to estimate the ratio of TKN and ammonia per pound of BOD ( 0.114 lb/lb and 0.182 Ib/lb, respectively). These ratios were used to project the 2020 loadings of 924 Ib/day and 1,474 Ib/day for ammonia and TKN. Resulting influent concentrations of ammonia and TKN are projected at 53 mg/L and 85 mg/L, respectively. Samples taken by plant personnel of the primary clarifier effluent for TKN between 5/31/94 - 10/5/94 indicated an average concentration of 47 mg/l. Assuming a 15% reduction through the primary clarifier, the plant influent TKN would be estimated at 55 mg/l. With the projection that the industrial components loadings will increase by 5001o, the design value of 85 mg/I for the influent TKN appears appropriate. 4.0 Recommended Design Criteria Recommended design for the new wastewater treatment plant is to accommodate projected growth through the year 2020. In addition, new treatment facilities should be hydraulically laid out to allow future expansion up to the build -out capacity of the City of Monticello. Current, recommended, and ultimate design criteria aro summarized in Table 4. Technical Memorandum No. 1 7 Monticello, MN 17,6 Table 4 Design Criteria Wastewater Treament Facilities Monticello, MN Technical Memorandum No. 1 8 Monticello. MN IZd Recommended Ultimate Build -out Parameter Existing WWPP Design Design Criteria Concentration Design Criteria Population 4020 12.494 21,973 DOmertie, Commercial, Imtitational Flow (ADW) 0.77 MGD 1.44 MGD — Flow (Average Annual) 1.67 MGD Flow (AWW) 1.90 MGD Flow (Peals Hourly) 3.80 MGD Flow (Peak instantaneous) — 4.09 MGD — BOD 1,600 lb/day 4,619 Ib/day 332 mgfl — TSS 1,470 Ib/day 4,369 Ib/day 314 mg/I — Total Phosphorus — 101 Ib/day 7 mg/I — Nitrogen (TKN) --• 841 lb/day, 60 mg/I — Ammonia — 527 Ib/day 38 mgfl — Indastrial(Wet & Dry) Flow (ADW) 0.14 MGD 0.35 MGD — %w (Annual Average) 0.41 MGD .low (AWW) — 0.46 MGD — Flow (Peak Hourly) — 0.93 MGD — Flow (Peak Instantaneous) — 1.00 MGD — BOD 4,670lb/day 3,483 Ib/day, 1027 mg/l — TSS 1,750lb/day 2,106 lb/day 621 mgfl — — Total Phosphorus — 76 Ib/day 22 mg/I — Nitrogen (TKN) — 634 Ib/day 187 mgfl — Ammonia — 397 Ib/day 117 mgfl — Total Flow (ADW) 0.91 MGD 1.79 MGD 3.49 MGD Flow (Annual Average) 2.07 MGD Flow (AWW) — 236 MGD — Flow (Peak Hourly) — 4.73 MGD — Flow (Peak Instantaneous) — 5.09 MGD 9.16 MGD BOD 6.270 lb/day 5.102 lb/day, 468 mgfl — TSS 3,220lb/day 6,4761b/day 374mg/I — Total Phosphorus — 177 Ib/day 10 mgfl — Nitrogtm (TIM) — 1.474 Ib/day 95 mgfl — Ammtmia — 924 Ib/day 53 mgfl — Technical Memorandum No. 1 8 Monticello. MN IZd Council Agenda - 7/24195 .Trrrr�::rrrrsr.�+arn�rrrr�Er�rrr1*-;rrr.-:sT:rrs:rr, hMM • t, A. REFURENCE AND BA .K •RO As you recall, a few months ago Council reviewed a proposed policy regulating and addressing issues relating to allowing final occupancies for home sites prior to completion of site improvements. Attached is information from the previous meeting which outlined the issues and problems associated with granting final occupancy prior to full completion of home site improvements. The last time Council reviewed this topic, Council received testimony from Dave Klein requesting that the Council reconsider adoption of the policy because the policy required funds to be placed in escrow prior to granting of final occupancy. It was his concern that the builders would be negatively impacted because both the City and the mortgage companies would be requiring deposits for guaranteeing completion of the same items. Klein was concerned that this situation could hurt the cash flow of his business. Subsequent to this meeting, I've had further discussions with Dave Klein and have been informed by him that mortgage companies are willing to release the funda necessary to complete site improvements if they are informed that the City is requiring a deposit assuring that said improvements are completed; therefore, there does not appear to be a situation where builders will suffer from a doubling -up of escrow requirements. Klein, therefore, has softened his view on the proposed city policy and actually supports the concept of establishing an escrow requirement prior to granting of final occupancies. At the previous meeting, staff was also asked to review the issue with the City Attorney in more detail. I have discussed the topic with Weingarden, and he is supportive of establishment of the policy as attached. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS; Motion to grant preliminary approval of the policy as proposed and direct City staff to send the policy to builders wonting in the community with a notice of a public hearing on the policy. Under this alternative, City Council would adopt the policy on a preliminary basis but withhold final approval until review of the policy with builders under a public hearing setting. Under this alternative, City Council will got additional input on the policy prior to implementation. Council Agenda - 7/24/95 Motion to adopt the policy as proposed and provide the builders with a notice that the policy will take effect on all homes with construction beginning after August 15, 1995, with one exception No final occupancy permits will be granted under any circumstance for home sites where final grading has not been completed. Motion to deny approval of the policy as proposed. C- STAFF' RECOMMFNDATION; Staff recommends alternative H1 or N2 with modifications as desired by Council. D. SUPPORTDYG DATA Agenda item from May 22, 1995, meeting; Copy of proposed policy. Council Agenda - W=9000� > > . Consideration of adontim go lcies gpvgrninrr granting a I3nal occummev Permit Prior to full completion of site Improvements. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to review the following general policy ideas regarding granting of final occupancy permits for new homes prior to full completion of site improvements. The need for the policy statement stems from problems that the City faces from time to time associated with allowing people to move into homes prior to hill completion of site improvements such as site grading, seeding and sodding, driveway improvements, and tree installation. In the recent past, the City has fallen short of its goal of making sure that all improvements are completed prior to allowing occupancy, and on frequent occasions, we have had difficulty in making sure that some of the improvements are completed on a timely basis after occupancy has occurred. The problems that we have faced include incomplete grading plans that have resulted in long-term storm water drainage problems. The Meadow Oak Circle situation is a prime example of a problem created due to failure in making sure all site improvements were done properly prior to final occupancy. Up to now, the City has been granting conditional occupancy permits with a notation that certain improvements are not completed We have left it up to the mortgage company and builder to establish an escrow fiend to assure _ completion of the improvements. Unfortunately, this level of security has not been sufficient to guarantee proper completion of improvements. Quite frequently, the escrow fund gets released without any inspection by the City, which results in improper completion of grading plans. The most significant reason why it is difficult to get all site improvements at the time of occupancy is due to weather. Obviously, it is impossible to complete all site grading and install sod and trees, etc., when homes are occupied during winter months. Similarly, during summer months, if it is a particularly wet time of year, certain improvements must wait. The following strategy is suggested as a means to curtail the problem. It will be the City's policy to deny any occupancy permit request until such time that all site improvements are completed with the following exception: /34 Council Agenda - 5/22195 EXCEPTION: In the event that weather conditions or other unique site conditions out of the control of the builder prohibit completion of site improvements, the City will grant final occupancy under the condition that a cash deposit is made to the City for each incomplete improvement in accordance with the following table. Grading $1,000 minimum deposit Sodding or seeding $ 500 Driveway $ 500 Trees $ 125 Other $ As necessary If a builder desires to obtain the final occupancy permit prior to completion of any of the improvements above, he must first demonstrate that they are unique conditions that prohibit him from completing the project prior to final occupancy. If this point can be demonstrated, then the City will grant occupancy if he/she provides the cash as required above. The City will then take the cash and deposit the funds and refund the money only at such time that the work is completed. There will also be an additional $50 fee for the reinspection necessary to show that the work was done. This fee will be paid at the time that the deposit is made. Once the reinspection is done, the City will refund the appropriate amount. The City will make one inspection of all the site improvements that are yet to be completed and will refund only the total amount of the deposits. In other words, the Building Inspector will not be inspecting each unfinished improvement item as it is completed. It is the intent of the City to retain the funds as an encouragement to the builder to complete the work on a timely basis. It is not the intent under this program to use the funds to complete the installation of the improvements if they are never completed. If it was our goal to have funds in hand to complete the improvements, then the deposits should be much higher than listed. Motion to adopt the policy as outlined above regarding granting of final occupancy where all site improvements have not been completed. /38 Council Agenda - S✓24W Under this alternative, City staff would use the general description noted above as the guideline in granting or withholding occupancy permits. Also, this policy would apply to residential developments only. Motion to deny the policy as outlined above. Under this alternative, Council is not satisfied with the policy as noted above and perhaps wishes to take stricter measures or finds that the problem is not a serious enough concern to warrant the measures noted. Staff recommends approval of the policy as noted. We have found that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. It is very important that site plana be developed properly in a manner consistent with grading and drainage plans, otherwise we will be faced with long-term drainage problems that are very difficult to overcome once a neighborhood has developed lawns established, trees planted, fences installed, etc. It is our view that requiring a fairly hefty deposit will discourage builders From seeking final occupancy until all site improvements are completed. But at the same time, the deposit is not so great as to become a burden to the developer that seeks occupancy during the winter months. Finally, Paul Waldron has reviewed the policy as proposed and noted that it is similar to policies auccessfidly used by other cities. lav CITY OF MONTICELLO PRELIIYUMMY ESCROW POLICY STATEMENT It is the City's policy to deny all residential home site occupancy permit requests until such time that site improvements are completed with the following exception: EXCEPTION: A. In the event that weather conditions such as frost or wet soils over a prolonged period or other unique site conditions out of the control of the builder prohibit completion of site improvements, the City will grant final occupancy under the condition that a cash deposit is made to the City for each incomplete improvement in accordance with the following table. Grading $1,000 minimum deposit Sodding or seeding $ 600 Driveway $ 600 Trees $ 126 Other $ As necessary B. If a builder desires to obtain the final occupancy permit prior to completion of any of the improvements above, he must fust demonstrate that unique conditions exist that prohibit completion of the project prior to final occupancy. If this point can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector, then the City will grant occupancy if he/she provides a cash deposit as required above. The City will deposit all funds and refund the money without interest only at such time that the work is completed. C. There will also be an additional $50 fee for the reinspection necessary to demonstrate that the work was completed properly. This fee will be paid at the time that the deposit is made. Once the reinspection is done, the City will refund the appropriate amount. The City will make one inspection of all the site improvements that are yet to be completed and will refund only the total amount of the deposits. In other words, the Building Inspector will not be inspecting each unfinished improvement item as it is completed. As an exception to this rulo, on a case-by-case basis the City may inspect grading prior to placement of sod. D. It is the intent of the City to retain the funds as an encouragement to the builder to complete the work on a timely basis. It is not the intent under this program to use the funds to complete the installation of the improvements if they aro never completed. If it was our goal to have Rinds in hand to complete the improvements, then the deposits should be much higher than listed. ESCROWPOL:7/2v86 13 D City Council Agenda - 7/24/95 14. Conanderatinn of Fnrrhaaing n switch nd .+ ad iUn al laser mcinter for city hiall use. (J.O., C.S., K.D.) City Council is asked to consider purchasing an additional laser printer, switchbox, and necessary cabling as budgeted for 1995. It is proposed to purchase another IBM 4019 laser printer and a switchbox which would automatically send print jobs from any connected workstations to the next available laser printer. Currently, the IBM 4019 laser printer being used at city hall is connected to 4 workstations via a small automatic switching device. We lost one of the 4 ports due to a recent lightening strike. Now only 3 workstations can access the printer. This is proving to be quite inconvenient for the user that is connected to the port that does not work. Because the switching device was not very expensive, it is not worth fixing.) At the present time, Assistant Administrator Jeff O'Neill does not have access to any printer. When he has to print something, he sends it through the fax machine which is not as efficient and does not look very professional. Otherwise, he copies documents onto disk and has someone else print it. Many of the documents that Jeff maintains on We computer will ultimately be groomed and finished by the Office Manager. In these situations, a printer may not be used at all because Jeff provides Karen with a disk containing the documents. However, in other cases it is difficult to manage without access to a printer. Due to the variety of duties required by his position, Jeff schedules projects and tracks activity on his computer. In addition, he keeps track of deadlines, meetings, and miscellaneous details associated with ongoing projects. It would be much more convenient if he had access to print this information as needed. The information is valuable not only to Jeff but also for other persons involved in planning issues and project development. Economic Development Director 011ie Korupchak is still using a Toshiba P321 dot matrix printer for all of her work. While the printer does provide her with a somewhat efficient means of getting her work out, the print quality is poor and the documents aro not professional looking. Her printer does not have the capability of printing directly on letterhead. When sho needs to send out a document on letterhead, she has to print it first and then copy it onto letterhead paper. This reduces the print quality even more. Also, the dot matrix printer does not support landscape (sideways) printing. If 011ie has anything that requires landscape printing, she has to give it to someone else to do. 19 City Council Agenda - 7/24/95 Because the Economic Development Director often is the first contact in the City for business and industrial inquiries, we believe it is important to provide a good first impression. The information that she sends out should reflect the appearance that the City wants to portray. By providing access to a laser printer, 011ie could print documents that would be much more professional looking. According to Computer Parts and Service (the company that maintains the laser printer), we are utilizing the IBM 4019 laser printer at quite a high rate. The users connected to the laser printer are finding that many times documents are being printed from more that one workstation at the same time, sometimes causing short delays. Because there are only 3 porta available on the small switching device for the printer, 011ie and Jeff cannot be hooked up to the laser printer at this time. In addition, it would not be very efficient to hook them up to the one laser printer we currently have, as the printer would probably not be fast enough to keep up with the added demands. Our recommendation would be to purchase from Computer Parts and Service an intelligent switchbox and an additional laser printer along with the cabling needed to attach all the devices. The intelligent switdrbox is estimated at $1180 and could control 2 printers and up to 12 workstations. A refurbished IBM 4019 laser printer can be purchased for an estimated $2600. This includes 4MB memory, postscript printing option, and 2 paper drawers, which is very similar to the 4019 laser printer the City currently owns. We reeom viand purchase of a refurbished printer because the new IBM model 4029/4039 is much more expensive. Computer Parts and Service states that a refurbished 4019 printer will be reliable, and parts for the 4019 printer are still available off the regular IBM price lists. Cabling Brom the workstations and printers to the switchbox is estimated ata maximum of $150. The advantage with the new cabling, which is similar to telephone cord, is that it is easier to arrange and less visible. The total outlay would bo no more than $3830, and there is $4200 available in the data processing capital outlay budget. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS; Approve the purchase of an intelligent switchbox for approximately $1180, an IBM 4019 laser printer estimated at $2800, and cabling costing about $160. This option should be selected if City Council agrees a laser printer should be socessible to all computer users at any given time. By utilizing an intelligent switchbox, output 6rom all users would be routed to the next available laser printer, or users could also have the option to select 20 City Council Agenda - 7/24/95 a specific printer if necessary. We are satisfied with the quality and use of the IBM 4019 we currently have and feel comfortable with purchasing the same type of machine for a second printer. A secondary advantage is that a printer should always be available even if one went down or was being cleaned. Currently, if the laser printer is out of commission, we have to wait to print documents until it is available again. Fortunately, we have not had any major down time. Approve the purchase of an intelligent switchbo: for approximately $1180 and cabling costing about $125. This option should be selected if Council agrees that all computer users should be able to access the City's current laser printer. It would be understood that accessibility may be limited at times dependent on demand. If the printer would go down, there would be no other printer available. Deny the purchase of any new equipment. This option should be selected if City Council finds that they do not feel it is necessary to purchase updated computer hardware at this time. City staff recommends alternative 01 to purchase an intelligent switchboz, an additional IBM 4019 laser printer, and cabling for a total of no more than $3830. This would be within the amount available in the budget. None. BRC FINANCIAL:SYSTEM 1 06/'20%98 11:34P:45. Di,,sHu,1-sament Journal LIARkANT DATE VENDOR 'DESCRIPTION AMOUNT' CL. GENERAL CHECKING 38699 06/19'/95 ST. CLOUD AUTO TRUCK 927 TITLE FEES/BUCKET TRU 770.00 38700 00/1'9/95 RAU/KEN 928 BUCKET TRUCK 11,.000.,00 381'10U 06/19/95 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORD 284 RECORDING FEES/EA5TW00 34.50 387'02 08/19/95 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL 'LSF 174 KEITH YRIPPE INS 'PREM 34.14 307,02 06/19/95 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF 174 KEITH TRIPPE INS PREM 499.36 534-.10 'sCH 307,03 06/19/95 MN DEPART ,OF NATURAL 118 WATER & ATV REG 54,0..:00 30704 08/19/05 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORD 254 FEC FEES/EASTWOOD KNOL 19..50 30705 06/19/95 U.S. POSTMASTER 210 NEWSLETTER MAILINGS 314.16 30706 06/1.9/95 MN CITY MANAGEMENT A 290 MEMBERSHIP DUEC/RICK W00..00' '18707 08/19/95 STEARNS MANUFACTURIN 792 LIFE J.ACKCTO/TIRE 00 308.74 = 50708 06/19/95 U.S. POSTMA:iTER 210 STAMPO/OfP REGISTRAR 212.00' 38700 06;/10/85 MARQUETTE DANK MONTI 221 C D/IHVESTMENT� 3,000,,000.00 90 d OD 0.6110/05 MARQUE-TTE DANK MONTI 22' 1 DANK CHARGE'S/•WINE MOVE 15-60 3.30U,01B.Go *CHI' JD710 U0/`?0/05 ,AFFORCI'ADLE CANITATro 00, LATRINE RENTAL/P'ARKS 50:@'8 30711 08/120/95 ANDE(ZOON & AOGOCIATL 1,0 OLCACHER & CHAIN FN 5,007.20 &0717 O6/20/0D ARAMAR� 840 CITY HAIL CUPPLIEP 0$.50 39743 00/20/05 4EEt(CR MAPLI: LAKE 00 :)30307 ,OD/LLI.ILON P,ARM 43.,00 30714 06/?0/95 BRAUN INTERTQeC CORPO 030 ENG FEEL/EQ4TWO:70 KNO b6+4,.00 907(4 ©0/,0155 GRAUC4 INTFRTCC CORPO 01,3 1N13 FCC3/Kl,l:iN ;'Aw!-1 0,009.90 DC!14 OG/.'0'/05 ORAUN '7tJ7tRTEC CORPO 630 ENG FECC/OCE160/SCF1 i,kOID,00 30il4 0/.'�v/IS PRAIIN INTC9f[`H CORPO 030 ENG Gt'''/P WORfT3 F%PA 301.50 b'364 .50 #CHS 9.0716 n6/l�0/05 COMM,;NITY U)JNV( 51MI: V') O(VINAIDA 57.1i0 1;715 1lG/20/0'5 FAY MIAR 00300 REFUNPp(-,VIPPVMT WA7 ME ?',•UO 3J 110 13i')0f95 FAY MA: .00960 gi.,vtND/c?YI'RPYM'F WA: M. T 1,62 2C.6p ► :11 GG/a0/95 FLEXinLf: Y00l C(-,M1)AN N0??1e/'XWf.W C, 1A 115.^,4 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 0.8/20/85 t,t -,341,45 CA:RRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING X8710 06.120/,95 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE 397118 06/20/95 F.00NTLINE PIUS FIRE 307'1'9 06/20/95 GLASS HUT,/TH'E 38720 06/20/95 MILEY'S SPRINKLER SY 30721 06/20/9S MOBrL 38727 08/20/95 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 3.9722 06/20/95 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 3,072206/70/05 OLSON & SONS ELECTRi 397?3 06/20/95 ,PAUL A WALDRON & ASS 38724 08/20/05 PUBLIC RESOURCE GROU 99725 06/20/'95 SHINGOSEE BUILDERS 3tl126 08/20/95 5PJ2ING3T[D'r IJVOQRP,4R 00726 06/20/98 5PRIN6STE0,, INCORPOR 3072G 06/20/06 SPRINGS'rUO, INCORPOR 3,0720 06/20/95 tSPRINGDTfl) INCORPOR 30710 06/20195 SPR INGJ.TED, INCORPOR 9(1726 09/20/95 JPfiINaSTED, ItJCSRPOR 90,7:47 04/20/03 WATERPRO ".PPLJEC CO 307?7 06/20/05 WATZR-PRO SUPPI,tvo O0 ((!NERAL CHCOKING A Disbursement Journal 'DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLI 540 PAGER CASES/FIRE DEPT 5'9,;.,50 51,0 NEW FIRE TRK EQUIPM 1 ,.690..00 1,738:50 66 NEW WINDOW/STREETS 1^8..00 930, SOLENOID/PARK DEPT 93..60 131 GAS/FIRE DEPT 9.29 160 UENERIA10k REPAX*S/WATE '90.85 160 STREET LIGHT MTC & REP 50.00 180 AXXAL FAN/WATER DEPT 50.03 100.69 83.0 BLD INSPECTION FEES 2,850.00 26 RE -G FEES/OLLIE K 445..00 6t2 CONST COSTS/PW.EX 1,08.,00b.17 307 BOND IS;t3UANC,E FEE 2.120'.15 'D,07 DOND ISSUANCE FEE 2,11'5.29 5'07 ,BOND iSSUANCC FEC 1;074.417 3'0? GOND I80UWNCE FEE 6,014.00 307 10OND tGrSUANC'H `FEE 6;035,.33 307 BONG ISLUANCE FEE 2,020.1.0' 18,397.00 670 WATCR METERS/WATER DE 77.5.:23 6-70 OAKQ4lDf3: PRJ'/MANOrjVL 48'7x.3'4 1,262,..56 TOTAL 9 , 4437 .1 RG .'04 990HE ■CHI MCMI *Cfi BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 08/3019S 14s 19.39 0lfebureement Journal (� `�►-vIARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C GENERAL CHECKING 38728 08/29/95 LOCAL GOV NUCLEAR WA 93'l COUNCIL SUBSCRIPTION 200.00 38729 08/29/95 MARQUETTE BANK MONTI 221 2 CO°S/250000.00 .500.000.00 38730 08/29/95 MARQUETTE BANK 'MONTI 211 WIRE 'C D 850.,000.00 38 730 06/29/95 'MARQUETTE BANK MONTI 221 MIRE CHARGE FOR C D 15.00 850,015.00 *C. 38731 08/29/98 WOLF STELLER/RICHARD' 217 MISE EXPENSE REIMS 274,.-28 38732 08/29/95 PITNEY BOWES 188 POSTAGE MCH MLC AGRM/ 129.00 38793, 08/29/85 MN DEPART OF NATURAL. 118 MATER/SNOW/ATV REG 790.00 38 734 08/29/95 NORWEST BANK MINNE SO 154 PAYING, AGENT FEES/60 200.'.00 38735 08/29/95 MARQUETTE BANK MONTI 222 CITY SHARE/FICA/K TRIP 42.18 38735 08/29/95 MARQUETTE BANK MONTI 22,2 CITY SHARE/MED/K TRIPPE 9.87 52.03 •C ' 38738 08/29/85 $HUMAN/CATHY 191 TRAVEL REIMB/SEMINAR 82.30 (--�)30737 08/29/85 BARTON SAND R GRAVEL 308 SAND/NEW PW EXPAN BLDG 23.98 38738 08/29/85 JONES/WILLIAM,,O .826 INFO CENTER SALARY 153.00 IW738 08/28/95 JONES/WILLIAM 0 948 INFO CENTER SALARY 48.00CR 108.00 *C 38739 08/29/95 FROELICH/R M .90399 ESCROW RE IMB/F STUD 2,800..00 38140 08/29/95 MARQUETTE BANK MONTI 722 CITY SHARE/FICA/K TRIPP 3.01 38740 08/28/85 MARQUETTE BANK MONTI 222 CITY SHARE/MED/K TRIPPE 0.70 3.71 $�C 38741 08/79/95 MN MUNICIPAL BOARD 397 ANNEXATION FILING FEE 25+.00 38742 08/29/95 SIMOLA/JOHN E. 308 MISC EXPENSE REIMS 48.21 38743 08/29/98 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORD 254 RECORDING FEES/KLEIN F 19.50 318744 08/29/85 MN DEPART Of NATURAL 116 MATER/SNOW/ATV REG 836.00 GENERAL CHECKING TOTAL 1.388.086.99 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 06/29/95 13::21.1 18 � `LARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38745 07/03/95 ARMA INTERNATIONAL 38746 07/03/95 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 38746 07/03/95 'AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 38746 07/03/95 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 38746 07/03/95 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 38747 07/03195 BUSINESS RECORDS COR 38748 07/03/95 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 38348 07/03/95 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 38748 07/03/95 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 38746 07/03/95 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 39749 07/03/95 CENTRAL MINN INITIAT 38750 07/03/95 CLARK FOOD SERVICE. 38751 07/03/95 CON WAY CENTRAL EXPR (—)9752 07/03/95 DOWNTOWN STANDARD 38753 07/03/95 EHLERS 8 ASSOC,INC P 38754 07/03/95 FLICKER'S T.V. A APP 38755 07/03/85 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE 38756 01/03/98 GOULD BROS. CHEV-OLD 387,57 07/03/95 HERMES/JERRY 39768 07/03/95 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC 38758 07/03/95 HOLMES 0 GRAVEN 38159 07/03/95 HOLMES A GRAVEN 38760 07/03/95, INTER CONF OF BLDG 0 39761 07/09/95 KEN'S 66 SERVICE 38762 07/03/98 LEO GERADD CONSTRUCT 18763 07/03/95 MARCO BUSINESS PROOU 38763 07/03/95 MARCO BUSINESS PROOU 38763 07/03/95 MARCO BUSINESS PROOU 38763 07/03/05 MARCO BUSINESS PRODU Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL 526 MEMBERSHIP DUES/K OOT 150.00 11 RADIO REPAIRS/STREET 58.97 17 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/SEW 37.73 17 RADIO REPAIRS/SHOP 96.56 17 BELT/P W INSPECTIONS 32.61 225.87 27 CHECKS/GENERAL FUND 647.48 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 40.23 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 0.79 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 8.93 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 144.90 194.85 822 CMIF GRANT PYMT 1,100.21 897 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 142.45 934LADDER/FIRE DEPT 81.61 378 GAS/FIRE DEPT 51.51 933 FUNDING OPTIONS/OUTLT 210.00 60 BATTERY/PW INSPECTIONS 13.83 S10 HOSE/NEM FIRE TRUCK 2.,410.58 70 FIRE DEPT VEH REPAIRS 293.92 81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50 85 OAS/FIRE DEPT 89.44 86 LEGAL FEES/MISS SHORES 74.40 88 LEGAL FEES/MRA 1.029.20 1,103.60 291 MEMBERSHIP DUES/GARY A 85.00 766 FIRC DEPT VEMICEL REP 16.25 932 NEW BALLFIELO/M OAK 4,500.00 106 COPY MACHINE MTC AG 4.270.50 106 TONER/COPY MACH/CIT 1,488.68 106 COPY MCH MTC AGRMT/D 152.79 106 TONER/COPY MCH/DEP RE 139.52 =Ch *cH •CF BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 06/29/95 13 :2 1118 M,.RRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38784 07/0 3/95 MCOOWALL COMPANY 38764 07/03/85 MCDOWALL COMPANY 98765 07/03/9S MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SU 38788 07/0305,MIDWEST ANALYTICAL S 38787 07/03/85 MN CLERKS 8 FIN OFFI 38768 07/03/95 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 38769 07/03/95 MONTICELLO SENIOR CI 38770 07/03/95 MOODY'S INVESTORS SE 38770 07/03/95 MOODY'S INVESTORS SE 38770 07/03/95 MOODY'6 INVESTORS SE 98770 07/03/95 MOODY'S INVESTORS SE 38770 07/03%95 MOODY'S INVESTORS SE 9770 07/03/9,5 MOODY'S INVESTORS SE 38771 07/03/95 NORWEST BANK MINNESO 38771 07/03/85 NORWEST BANK MINNESO 38772 07/03/95 OLSON, USSET,AGAN $ 38773 07/03/95 P 9 H WAREHOUSE SALE 38774 07/03/95 RELIABLE CORPORATION 38174 07/03/95 RELIABLE CORPORATION 38775 07/03/95 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC 38775 07/03/95 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC 38775 07/03/95 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC 38776 07/03/95 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COM 38777 07/03/95 TAB PRODUCTS CO. 38770 07/03/95 U.S. POSTMASTER J9779 07/03/95 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO GENERAL CHECKING Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL 6.051 .46 OCH 111 FURNACE REP/FIRE DEPT 343.00 L11 FURNACE REP/CITY HALL 749.23 1.092.23 OCH 114 HOSE/STREET DEPT 78.13 925 TESTING/FIRE MALL 722.00 315 MEMBERSHIP ODES/K DOTY 30.00 1.65, ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1.'100.00 139 MONTHLY CONTRACT PY 2,833.33 313 GO BOND ISSUANCE FEE 702.72 313 GO BOND ISSUANCE FEE 608.24 313 GO BOND ISSUANCE FEE 354.56 313 GO BOND ISSUANCE FE 1,885.28 313 GO BONDISSUANCE FE 1.,992.32 313 GO BOND ISSUANCE FEE 886.68 6,400.00 OCH 154 PAYING AGEN FEES/77 B 200.00 154 INTEREST/GO BOND 77 6,737.50 6,997.50 OCH 262 MISC 'PROF SERV/KLEI 1.005.00 274 N022LES.ETC/PARKS 4.551.50 179 COMPUTER SUP/CITY HALL 18.22 179 COMPUTER SWITCH/C HALL 25.59 41.81 OCH 221 FIRE DEPT VEM REPAIRS 141.00 227 PARK DEPT VEH REPAIRS 208.06 227 STREET DEPT VEH REPAI 250.24 599.36 OCH 644 AD FOR BIDS/SCHOOL BL 285.00 671 CITY HALL OFFICE SUP 145.47 210 POSTAGE/CITY HALL 1,500.00 219 SCE RG GRANT PYMT 2.16 0.51 TOTAL 47,675.40 0 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/07/95 12.34:59 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38780 07/07/95 HERMES/JERRY 367'81 07/07/95 KRAMBER'& ASSOCIATES 38782 07'/07/95 JONES/WILLIAM 0 38,782 07/07/95 JONES/WILLIAM O' 38783 07/07/95 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORD 38784 07/07/95 LUKACH/JOHN 38,784 07/07/95 'LUKACH/JOHN 38784 07/07/95 LUKACH/JOHN 38784 03/07/95 LUKACH/JOHN 38785 07,/07/96 0 & K REFUSE RECVCLI 38786 07/07/95 SEATTLE FILMWORKS 38787 07/07/95 AME GROUP 38788 07/07/95 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 38789 07/07/95 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 30790 07/07/95 BARTON SAND & GRAVEL 9879,1 07/07/95 BERGSTROM'S LAWN & G 0079? 07/07/95 BUCHEN ENVIRONMENTAL 38,7,93 07/07/95 RIJR1-INUTON NORTHERN 00794 07/07/95 C J BROWN BUSINESS S 30795 07/07/95 CAREFRCE LAWN GERVIC 90705 07/07/95 CAREFREE LAWN SERVIC 30796 07/07/05 CLARK BOARDMAN CALLA 30791 07/07/05 COPY OUPLCATING PROD 7090 07/07/05 DINO'S DELI f' 30709 07/07/08 DUO CHEM INC. Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50 688 ASSESSING CONTRACT 1.321.24 826 INFO CENTER SALARY 136.00 828 INFO CENTER 'SALARY 40.000R 254 RECORDING FEES/KLEIN FM 8.00 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 60.91 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 20.30 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 20.30 327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 20..31 121.82 *( G1.1 RECYCLING CONTRACT 3,270.84 .90400 PICTURES/JEFF O/PLAN 31,,.75 8 MONUMENT/ELLISON PK 857.45 118 WATER/SNOW/ATV REG 665.00 3 PEST CONTROL/LIBRARY 46.98 305 SAND/NEM MONUMENT/PAR 123.11 441 VEH REPAIR PARTS/PARK 131.09 937 PROF SERV/SUMP PUMP 5,250.00 337 CONST COSTS/BIKE PA 3.375.00 597 CITY NEWSLETTERS 670.64 940 MOWING CHG9/FIRE DEPT 127.00 040 MOWING CHGS/LIBRARY 127.00 255 . GO *� 604 PLAN & ZONING BOOKS 221.39 41 COPY MCH MTC/LIURARV 54.40 .00719 FOOD/MEETINGO 100.11 517 GLOVC•S/SEWER COLL 09.98 ,BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/07/95 12: 34:'59 �� fesf` ' WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38800 07/07/95 DYNA SYSTEMS 38801 07/07/95 FEEDRITE CONTROLS, I 38802 07/07/95 FOREST CITY ROAD LAN' '38803 07/07/95 GAR,TNER''S OFFICE PRO 38804 07/07/95 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE 38805 07/07/95 GRUYS BORDEN CARLS 38806 07/07/95 HIGH TECH ROOFING 38807 07/07/95 HOGLUND COACH LINES 38808 07/07/95 KEN ANDERSON TRUCKIN 38809 07/07/95 'KENNEDY & GRAVEN 38800 01/07/95 KENNEDY & GRAVEN 38808 07/07/95, KENNEDY & GRAVEN }8009 07/07/95 KENNEDY & GRAVEN 38809 07/07/95 KENNEDY & GRAVEN 38009 07/01/95 KENNEDY @ GRAVEN 38010 07/07/95 KOROPCHAK/OLIVE 30811 07/07/95 MARTIE'S FARM GERVIC 38011 07/07/95 MARTIE'S FARM GERVIC 3801,2 07,/07,/95 MAUS FOODS 38912 07/07/96 MAUS F0000 38012 07/07/35 MAUS FOODO 38013 07/07/95 MIDWEST P4ACHINERY. .I 98014 07 /07/95 MN CITY MANAGEMENT A 38814 07/07/95 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEA 30016 07/07/95 MN DEPT OF AOMINISTR 38017 07/07/95 NATIONAL OUS11ING PAR { 30017 80017 0! /07 /05 NATIONAL OU!,HING PAR 01/07/95 NATIONAL OU3HING VAR 90017 09 /07/05 NATIONAL GUGHING PAR Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT t 50NUTS . BOLTS/SHOP & GAR $50-93 56 PROF SERVICES/WATER D 120.00 563 DEMO/SHOP & GAR 31.80 377 POSTAGE/WATER DEPT 8.46 64 LAWN ROLLER/PARKS DEPT 1.00 74 AUDIT FEES 10,760.00 556 SEN CI? BLD ROOF REPAI 96.99 483 HEARTLAND BUS CONTR 5,348.88 687 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICE 31 .95 839 1995A BONO FEE/TRK BE 445.41 939 1995A BOND FEE/EASTWD 442.63 938 1995A BOND FEE/S WEST 224.76 939 1995A BOND FEE/KLEI 1.258..51 839 1995A BOND FEE/OCEL 1,262.99 938 1495A BOND FEE/C HILL 422.75 4,057.10 1t, 97 MILEAGE EXPENSE 40.88 107 SUPPLIES/MATER DEPT 4•.03 107 SUPPLIES/PARKS DEPT 2.35 6.30 108 SUPPLIES/LIBRARY 17.21 100 CLEANING SUPPLIES/LIB 52.42 108 3UPPhIES/PW INSPECTIONS (3.99 76.62 rt 809 MANIFOLD/STREET DEPT 13.20 230 MEMBERSHIP DUES/JEFF 0 60.00 235 QTRY WATER CONN FEE 2,,,223.00 930 FILE RETENTION UPDATE 'l.00 144 VEH REPAIR PARTS/PAPKG 11.14 144 VEH REPAIR PARTS/SEWER 1.00 144 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS/ 100.40 144 MlCC LUPPLIEO/GTREET D :)9.G5 157.31 •' BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/07/95 12:e34.59 ARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38818 07/07/95 OLSON-& SONS ELECTRI 38819 07/07,/95 PAUL A'WALDRON & ASS 38820 07/07/95 PHOTO I 38620 07/07/95 PHOTO I 38820 07/07/95 PHOTO I 38820 07/07/95 PHOTO I 38820 07/0,7/95 PHOTO I 38821 07/.07/95 PLUMBEk,Y-PURCELL'S P 38822 07/07/95 PUBLIC RESOURCE GROU 30023 07/07/95 -'ETON NAME PLATE CO 38824 07/07/95 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 30624 07/07/95 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 38824 07/07/95 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 30824 07/07/95 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 0.- 38025 07/07/95 SPECTRUM SUPPLY CO. 38825 07/07/95 SPECTRUM SUPPLY CO. 38826 07/07/95 VAGKO RUBBISH REMOVA 38826 07/07/05 VASKO RUBBISH RE40VA 38027 07/07/95 VIKING COCA COLA 30028 07/07/85 WRIGHT HENNEPIN SUCU 00020 07/07/85 WRIGHT HENNEPIN SECU 39029 07/07/85 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP 30830 07/07/90 9ARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, GENERAL CHECKING C Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 160 FIRE DEPT SUPPLIES 30.99 830 $LD INSPECTION FEES 2,637.50 743 PICTURES/PW INSPEC 30.90 743 PICTURES/M O TRK SEWER 58.59 743 PICTURES/WWTP 18.80 743 PICTURES/SOUTHWEST AREA 4,.24 743 PICTURES/NEWSLETTER 1.3.83 126.36 st 251 MISC SUPPLIES/MATER 3.18 26 PROF SER/MISS SHORES 56.25 691 NAME PLATES/NEW PW BL 161.70 1;93'SUPPLIES/STREET DEPT 19.72 193 SUPPLIES/PARKS DEPT 66.20 193 PICNIC TABLES/PARKS 586.46 183• SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 15.34 6,87.72( 498 GLOVES/STREET DEPT 17.80 498 SUPPLIES/PARK$ DEPT 189.24 207.13 tC 524 GARBAGE CONTRACT 10,700.08 524 SALES TAX/GARBAGE CON 684.23 11,394-..31 •( 779 POP PARK$ 84.25 875 ALARM SYS MTC/DEP RLG 1',9.12 875 ALARM SYS MTC/PARKS 10..89 35.10 •( 512 UTILITIES 9.00 499 GUTTER UROLIM/STREETS 365.30 TOTAL 00.201.00 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/12/95 07:57:33 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 30831 07/12/95 A.E. MICHAELS 3e831 07/12/95 A.E. MICHAELS 361831 07/12/95 A.E. MICHAELS 3e831 07/12/95 A.E. MICHAELS Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CI 336 BLD REP SUPPLIES/PARKS 44.96 338REPAIR ,SUPPLIES/STREET 81.54 338 BLD REPAIR SUP/C HALL 18.68 338 SUPPLIES/PARKS DEPT 54.34 199.52 *c1 36832 07/12/95 AGASSI2 ENVIRONMENTA 761 PETROFUND APPLICATION 250.00 30833 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA 38833 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 38833 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA 38833 07/ 1'2/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL 'BA 38933 01/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA 3;9833 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 30833 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL 'BA 38833 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA 38833 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 38833 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA 39033 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 38e33 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA 38633 01/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA 38833 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA 38833 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA 38833 07/12/95 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA INTEREST/'1990A BON 12,,232.50 INTEREST/1889 BOND 4,398.75 INTEREST/19908 BON 14,427.50 INTEREST/ 1967 BOND 2,237.50 INTEREST/1981 BOND 8092.50 INTEREST/ 1905 BOND 11,127.50 INTEREST/1988 BOND 8,635.00 INTEREST/1988 $EWE 21,88.7.30 INTEREST/1988 WATE 27,2.76.25 INTEREST/ 1968 GO B 40,611.25 INTEREST/ 1969 BOND 10,272.50 INTEREST/ 1990 BOND 6,295.00 INTEREST/19800'86ND 9,310.00 INTEREST/1991A BONO 8,222.50 INTEREST/1992 BOND 14,627.50 INTEREST/1982 BOND 4,700.00 202,433.75 *CI 38834 07/12/95 ANDERSON & ASSOCIATE 10 SIGNS FOR RESALE 307.85 38835 07/12/95 ASSOCIATED VETERINAR 683 VET SUPPLIEV ANIMAL CO 64.18 30838 01/12/95 BAUERLY BROS COMPANI 941 BITUMINOUS/STREET DEP 234.48 30837 07/12/85 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 638 ENG FEES/EASTWOOD KNO 628.86 38837 07/12/95 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 638 ENG FEES/PW EXPANSION 114.75 38897 07/12/95 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 638 ENG FEES/KLEIN FARM 1,584.08 38837 07/12/98 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 638 CONST COSTS/KLEIN 413,236.12 PHONE CHARGES 65.67 415.548.63 *CF 38838 07/12/85 BREITBACH CONSTRUCTI 38839 07/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 33839 01/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 39638 07/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 36039 07/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON D0936 07/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 30839 07/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 30839 07/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 36838 07/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 38939 07/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 30839 07/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 926 CONST COSTS/EASTWO 85,983.14 24 PHONE CHARGES 118.37 24 PHONE CHARGES 18.80 24 PHONE CHARGES 170.11 24 PHONE CHARGES 201.67 24 PHONE CHARGES 188.58 24 PHONE CHARGED 80.00 24 PHONE CHARGES 59.66 24 PHONE CHARGES 63.97 24 PHONE CHARGES 104.37 24 PHONE CHARGES 65.67 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 0.7/12/95 07,:57:33 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 36839 07/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 38839 07/12/95 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON 38840 07/12/95 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INC 38841 07/12/95 CONTINENTAL SAFETY E 38842 07/12/95 DOWNTOWN STANDARD 38843 07/12/95 G & K SERVICES 38643 07/12/95 G & K SERVICES 38843 07/12/95 G & K SERVICES 38843 07/12/95 G & K SERVICES 38843 07/12/.95 G & K SERVICES 38643 07/12/95 G & K,SERVICES 38843 07'/12'/95 G & 'K SERVICES 38844 07112/95 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 38844 07/12/95 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 38944 07/12/95 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 38844 07/12/95 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 38844 07/12/95 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 38845 07/12/95 HENRY & ASSOCIATES 38846 07/12/98 HERMES/JERRY 38947 07/12/95 J M OIL COMPANY 38847 07/12/85 J M OIL COMPANY 38848 07/12/95 LARSON'S ACE HAROWAR 36846 07/12/95 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 38848 07/12/95 LARSON'S ACE HAROWAR 38848 07/12/95 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 38848 07/12/95 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 36848 07/12/95 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 30048 07/12/95 LARSON'S ACE HAROWAR 38848 07/12/85 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 38848 07/12/05 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 30840 07/12/85 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 38048 07/12/95 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 30048 07/12/05 LARCON'S ACE HARDWAR 30848 07/12/93 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 30048 07/12/05 LARSON'$ ACE HARDWAR 30048 07/12/95 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 38848 07/12/05 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 24 PHONE CHARGES 610.59 24 PHONE CHARGES 59.88 11789.65 30 SHOP SUPPLIES 63.02 256 NOSE CUP/FIRE DEPT 168.34 378 GAS/FIRE DEPT 25.60 851 UNIFORM RENTAL 37.06 951 UNIFORM RENTAL 51.85 851 UNIFORM RENTAL 30.35 851 UNIFORM RENTAL 30.35 651 UNIFORM RENTAL 176.51 851 UNIFORM RENTAL 178.51 851 SHOP SUPPLIES 40.69 543.31 78'VEH REP ,PARTS/SEWER CO 3.7•.84 78 MTC OF EQUIP/STREETS 29.49 78 EQUIP REP PARTS/STREETS 1.31 78 SMALL TOOLS/STREETS 4.25 70 SUPPLIES/MATER DEPT 28.72 101.61 545 WATER VALVES/MATER 684.00 81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50 95 OIL/FIRE DEPT 59.50 95 GAS/STREET DEPT 1,750.78 1,810.28 874 SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 44.37 874 MTC OF BLD/FIRE DEPT 57.38 874 SUPPLIES/SEWER COLL 109.20 874 MTC OF BLD/OEP REG 14.34 874 SUPPLIES/MATER DEPT 22.49 874 EQUIP REP PARTS/SEWER 2.65 874 LADDER/OEP REGISTRAR 70.20 074 CLEANING SUP/LBIRARY 20.58 074 SUPPLIES/SHOP & GAR 14.18 074 SUPPLIES/STREET DEPT 150.93 974 SLO REPAIR SUP/SHOP & G 5.00 874 SMALL TOOLS/PAP.KS DEPT 39.39 874 SMALL TOOLS/STREET OEP 00.22 874 SUPPLIES/DARKS DEPT 89.10 874 EQUIP REP PARIS/STREET 18.60 674 SMALL TOOLS/SHOP & GAR 21.28 *C BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM Z07/12/.95 0715703 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38849 07/12/95 LASER SHARP, INC. 38850 07/12/95 MARSH-MCSIRNEY. INC. 3885-1 07/12/95 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SU 38852 OT/ 12/95 MINNEGASCO 38852 07/ 12/95 MINNEGASCO 38852 07/12/95 MINNEGASCO 38952 07/ 12/95 MINNEGASCO 38852 07/12/95 MINNEGASCO 38952 07/ 12/95 MINNEGASCO 38852 07/ 12/95 MINNEGASCO 38852 07/ 12/9S MINNEGASCO 38853 07/ 12/95 MN STATE TREASURER 38854 07/ 12/95 14ONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 38855 07/ 12/95 MONTICELLO CHAMPION 38856 07/ 12/95 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 38856 07/ 1,2/95 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 38856 07/12/95 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 38888 07/ 12/95 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 38856 07/12/95 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 38856 07/ 12/95 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 38856 07/ 12/95 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 38857 07/ 12/95 MONTICELLO PRINTING 38858 07/ 12/95 MONTICELLO ROTARY 38858 07/ 12/95 MONTICELLO ROTARY 38859 07/ 12/95 MONTICELLO TIMES 38859 07/ 12/95 MONTICELLO TIMES 30859 07/12/85 MONTICELLO TIMES 38959 07/12/95 MONTICELLO TIMES f 38000 07/12/05 MOON MOTOn SALES, IN ` 38861 07/12/95 MTI DISBTRIBUTING CO Disbursement Journal' DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C 783.14 936 COMPUTER CARTRIOGE/C H 89.50 935 FLOWMETER/'SEWER DEP 5, 803.40 114 EQUIP REP PARTS/STREE 118.65 772 UTILITIES 23.1?CR 772 UTILITIES 24.62 772 UTILITIES 14.29 772 UTILITIES 9.59 772 UTILITIES 4.86 772 UT°ILITIES 27.36 772 UTILITIES 118.28 772 UTILITIES 7.38 182.81 262 STATE BLD PERMIT CH 1. 784.34 185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1, 100.00 825HANDLE/PW INSPECTION VA 7.44 136 OFF SUP/LIBRARY 9.80 136 OFF SUPPLIES/CITY HAL 401 .09 136 OFF SUPPLIES/WATER DE 110.76 136 OFF SUPLIES/PARKS DEPT 1.34 130 OFF SUPPLIES/P WORKS 09.35 136 F ILE CABINET/PW WORKS 250.49 136 COPY MCH PAPER/C HALL 114.00 958.83 137 ACCIDENT FORMS/FIRE DE 37.38 138 ROTARY DUES/OLLIE K 201.00 138 ROTARY DUES/.TEFF 0 201.00 402.00 140 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 590.40 140 B LO PERMIT INFO 54.80 140 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 125.59 140 LEGAL PUB/MISS SHORES 304.08 1.074.87 142 £UPPLIES/PARKS DEPT 19.40 299 CASTOR WHEEL/PARKS 92.36 *C1 ;CF SO •C1 •C1 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/12/.95 07:57:33 IWARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38862 07/12/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38862 07/12/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38862 07/12/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38882 07/12/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38862 07/12/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38862 07/12/95 NORTHERN STATES 0OWE 36862 07/12/85 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38862 07/12/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38882 07/12/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38863 07/12/95 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS 38864 07/12/95 O'NEILL/JEFF 38885 07/12/95 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, I 38888 07/12/95 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 38888 07/12/95 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 38888 07/12/95 ORR-SCHELEN-MAVERON 38888 07/1.2/95 ORR-SCMELEN-MAYERON f 38886 07/12/95 ORR-SCHELEN-MAVERON 3,8866 07/12/95 ORR-SCHELEN-MAVERON 38886 07/12/95 ORR-SCHELEN-MAVERON 36866 07/'12/95'ORR-SCHELEN-MAVERON 39867 07/12/95 PICK'S MANUFACTURING 38868 07/12/98 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S 36866 07/12/95 PREUSSE'S CLEANINGS 39860 07/12/95 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 38670 07/12/93 SCHARBER & SONS, INC 36071 07/12/95 SPEC MATERIALS. INC. 38672 07'/12/98 STEVE'S ELK RIVER NU 38873 07/12/95 TAO PRODUCTS CO. 38874 07/12/95 TRI-STATE PUMP & CON { 80075 07/12/95 WATCRPRO CUPPLIES CO l 30876 07/12/95 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORD Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 148 UTILITIES 4,227.41 148 UTILITIES 349.54 148 UTILITIES 4,637.58 148 UTILITIES 1,074.83 148 UTILITIES 14.14 148 UTILITIES 482.94 148 UTILITIES 248.53 148 UTILITIES 571.16 148 UTILITIES 1,019.99 12.828.62 550 PLANNING & 20NING F 5,259.00 161 MILEAGE EXPENSE 81.78 836 PROF SERVICES/MATER OP 44.00 162 MISC ENG FEES 1,573.94 162 REIMB ENG FEES 5,568.22 162 ENG FEES/KLEIN FAR 34,251.18 1,62 ENG FEES/C HILLS IV 414.00 182 ENG FEES/EASTWOOD K 7.942.01 162 ENG FEES/TRK SEWER EK 892.49 162 ENG FEES/SOUTHWEST 2,077.34 162 ENG FEES/FAY MAR PROD 551.81 53,270.99 790 SUPPLIES/SEWER COLL 88.54 173 FIRE HALL CLEANING 50.00 173 CITY HALL, CLEANING 400.00 450.00, 175 WWTP CONTRACT PYMT 32,926.08 229 YEN REPAIR PARTS/PARKS 79.27 196 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/ST 200.14 828 SHRUBS/PARKS 509.34 671 OFFICE SUPPLIES/C HAL 145.47 032 RENTAL/FLO TOTE/SEW 1.384.80 C70 HETERS/WATER DEPT 488.19 2S4 RECORDING FEES/KLEIN FM S.00 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM r 07/1,2/95 07:57 : 33' `LWARFtANT 'DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38877 07/12/95 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPO GENERAL CHECKING 1 11 Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C' 224 CONTRACT, PAYMENT 625,00 TOTAL 830.870.60 0 c BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/18/95 11:11:48 ARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 38837 07./17/95 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 38837 07/17/95 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 38837 07/17/95 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 38837 07/17/95 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 38878 07/17/95 RYAN CONTRACTING INC 38879 07/17/95 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 38880 07/17/95 MN DEPART OF REVENUE 38880 07/17/95 MN DEPART OF REVENUE 38880 07/17/95 MN DEPART OF REVENUE 38881 07/18/95 A T & T INFO SYSTEMS 38882 07/18/95 AFFORDABLE SANITATIO 38883 07/18/85 ARAMARK 30884 07/18/95 BARBAROSSA 6 SONS, I 38885 07/18/96 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 30885 07/18/85 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 30685 07/18/85 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 38806 07/18/95 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS, 38887 07/16/95 CAREFREE LAWN SERVIC 30000 07/10/03 C1ICLSCY FARM 39889 07/19/95 COMMUNICATION AUDITO 30890 07/18/05 CULLIGAN 30001 07/10/95 FED EX 30092 07/18/95 FERRELLGA,9 30893 07/10/95 FRONTLINE PLUS, FIRE 30904 07/18/95 G & K SERVICES 30005 07/10/05 HDR ENGINEERING, INC Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 638 CHECK VOIDED 628..88CR 638 CHECK VOIDED 114.75CR 638 CHECK VOIDED 1,564.88CR 638 CHECK VOIDED 413,238.12CR 415,546.63CR 750 CONST COSTS/KLEIN 413,238.12 119 MATER/SNOW/ATV REG 828.00 119 SALES TAX/2ND QTR 0.20 119 SALES TAX/2ND QTR 22.09 119 SALES TAX/2ND QTR 719.71 742.00 15 FIRE PHONE CHARGES 33.00 802 LATRINE RENTAL/PARKS 58.58 848 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 85.50 942 PYMT/STORM SEWER/ 124,105.15 638 ENG FEES/EASTW00D KNO 628.88 838 ENG FEES/PW EXPANSION 114.75 638 ENG FEES/KLEIN FARM 1,584-.88 2,308.51 25 BITUMINOUS/STREET DEP 292.34 940 MOWING CHARGES 542.50 943 ROCK/CITY HALL SHRUBS 101.70 90 PAGER.DATTERIES,ETC/F 520.04 753 WATER SOFTNER CHG/RENT 23.11 394 POCTAGE/SCANNER RETURN 23.50 911 GAS/STREET DEPT GU.03 510 N022LE/NEM FIRE TRUCK 661.50 051 RUGS/DEP REG OFFICE 28.41 044 WWTP TOURS 1,600.75 8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 01/18/95 11:,11:48 `� 07/18/95 -WARRANT DATE VENDOR 07/18/95 GENERAL CHECKING 38896 07/18/95 HEIKES/DARRYL 3.8897 0,7/18/95 KRAMBER & ASSOCIATES 38898 07/18/95 LIBERTY SAVINGS 38898 07/18/95 LIBERTY SAVINGS 38899 07/18/95 MCDOWALL COMPANY 38899 07/16/95 MCOOWALL COMPANY 38900 07/18/95 MIDWEST VISION DISTR 38900 07/18/95 MIDWEST 'VISION DISTR 38900 07/18/95 MIDWEST VISION DISTR 3890'1 07/18/95 MOBIL 38902 07/18/95 MTI DISBTRIBUTING CO ;38903 07/18/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 38904 07,/1'8/95 RELIAB'L'E CORPORATION 38904 07/18/95 RELIABLE CORPORATION 38904 07/18/96 RELIABLE CORPORATION 38906 07/18/96 SCHILLEWAERT LANDSCA 38906 07/18/95 SENSIBLE LAND USE CO 38906 07/48/96 SENSIBLE LAND U 9E CO D0000 07/18/85 SENSIBLE LAND USE CO 98907 07/10/95 SHINGOSEE SUILDERS 38900 07/18/95 SPEC MATERIALS. INC. 38909 07`/18/85 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDI -TO 30909 07/48/95 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO 30910 07/18/95 ZIEGLER, INC. GENERAL C•HECKiNG C Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL. 948 REFUND/ACT 910004406 20.80 688 ASSESSING SERVICES 1,321.22 945 REFUND/WATER METER 110.00 945 REFUND/SALES TAX 7.15 1'17..'15 *CH 111 REPAIRS/CITY HALL AIR 184.00 11'1 LIBRARY FURNACE REPAI 122.,00 306.00 *CH 279 GLASSES/PW INSPECTIONS 31.00 279 GLASSES/P WORKS $4.00 279 GLASSES/STREET DEPT 48.00 '133.00 *CH 131 GAS/PARKS DEPT 4.23 299 NEW LAWN MOWER/PAR 13,299.12 148 UTILITIES 34.98 ,179 TABLES/CITY HALL 229.62 179 COMPUTER CABLE/CIT.Y HA 35.54 179 DISK MAILERS/CITY HALL 20.03 285.19 *CF 382 TREE REMOVAL CHARGE 1,065.00 863 SEMINAR/JOHN S 25.00 863 SEMINAR/D'ICK F 25.00 063 SEMINAR/BRETT W 25.00 75.00 *CI S1'2 CONST COSTS/PW EX 1274,318.60 196 CUTTER/STREET DEPT 590.93 219 ;HERIFF'S CONTRACT 24,409.33 218 AOD'L LANDFILL CHGS 8,27-8.05 32,747.30 •CI 425 EQUIP MTC/'STREET DEPT 34.22 TOTAL 307,260.43 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/03/95 07:57:01 Disbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT LIQUOR CHECKING 18182 06/30/95 SERVICE SALES CORPOR 600042 OFFICE SUPPLIES/TAPE 30.68 18183 06/30/95 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTE 800112 OFFICE SUPPLIES/LABELS 24.30 18184 06/30/95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800180 LIQUOR PURCHASE 623.61 18184,06/30/95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800180 WINE PURCHASE 83.90 707.51 18185 06/30/95 JOHNSON BROSWHOLESA 8,00022 WINE PURCHASE 2,980.22 18185 06/30/95 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 LIQUOR PURCHASE 183.50 3,163..72 18186 06/30/95 LIEFERT TRUCKING 800025 FREIGHT CHARGES 563.40 18187 06/30/95 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 600012 DUE/INVOICE 53171 0.20 18187 06/30/95 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 WINE PURCHASE 173.22 18167 06/30/95 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 MIX FOR RESALE 105.88 279.28 18188 06/30/95 GRIGGS. COOPER & COM 800018 LIQUOR PURCHASE 4,388,.1& 18188 06/30/95 GRIGGS. COOPER & COM 800018 WINE PURCHASE 108.72 4,494.90 18189 06/30/95 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I 800019 BEER PURCHASE 6,775.55 18180 06/30/95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800160 LIQUOR PURCHASE 226.91 1819006/30/95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800160 'WINE PURCHASE 199.90 426.81 19191 06/30/85 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 600022 WINE PURCHASE 414.20 18191 06/30/95 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 LIQUOR PURCHASE 1,836.39 2,310.59 19192 06/30/95 GRIGGS, COOPER & COM 800016 LIQUOR PURCHASE 2,603.59 18193 06/30/95 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 MIX FOR RESALE 130.48 18193 06/30/95 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 900012, WINE PURCHASE 379..09 509.55 18194 06/30/95 BELLBOY CORPORATION 800096 FILBERT NUTS FOR RESAL 24.00 18194 06/30/95 BELLBOY CORPORATION 800088 COOLERS. ETC. FOR RES 370.70 394.70 10105 00/30/95 BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA 800001 POP PURCHASE 377.10 18196 06/30/95 CARLSON REFRIGERATIO 800094 NEW COOLERS 14,645.95 10107 06/30/95 DAY DISTRIBUTING COM 800010 NONALCOHOLIC BEER 90.00 19197 00/30/95 DAY DISTRIBUTING COM 800010 BEER PURCHASE 1.805.10 1,901.10 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/03/95 07:57:01 Disbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C LIQUOR CHECKING 18198 06/30/95 DICK WHOLESALE CO., 800011 BEER PURCHASE 5,4 22.65 18198 06/30/95 DICK WHOLESALE CO., 8000.11 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 33.01 5,455.66 •C 18199 06/30/95 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 WINE PURCHASE 643. 19 18199 06/30/95 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 MIX FOR RESALE 25.75 668.94 »C 18200 06/30/95 FLESCH'S PAPER SERVI 800116 PAPER BAGS 281.66 18201 06/30/95 G a K SERVICE 800129 NEW RUGS/MTC OF BLD 68.17 18202 06/30/95 GRIGGS. COOPER & COM 900018 LIQUOR PURCHASE 3,2 60.69 18203 06/30/95 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I 800019 BEER PURCHASE 15,331.65 18204 06/30/95 HOME JUICE 800130 JUICE FOR RESALE 149.85 18205 06/30/95 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 WINE PURCHASE 1,7 98.79 Q 18206 06/30/95 JUDE CANDY & TOBACCO 600021 CIGS & CIGARS/FOR RES 300.46 16206 06/30/95 JUDE CANDY & TOBACCO 800021 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 64.80 18206- 06/30/96 JUDE CANDY & TOBACCO 800021 TOBASCO SAUCE/FOR RESAL 4.66 458.12 tC 18207 06'/30/95 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 800184 BLD MTC SUPPLIES 52.08 18208 06/30/95 MCDOWALL COMPANY 800065 NEW CONDENSER/COOLE 8,167.21 18209 06/30/95 MINNEGASCO 800160 UTILITIES 20.68 18210 06/30/95 NORTHERN STATES POWE 600035 UTILITIES 1,341.20 10211 06/30/85 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 800036 HOOKUP NEW COOLER 779.22 18212 06/30/95 PAUSTIS & SONS 600103 WINE PURCHASE 728.92 18213 06/30/95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800160 WINE PURCHASE 1.273.23 1821'3 06/30/85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800190 LIQUOR PURCHASE 2.368.81 3.642.04 •C 18214 06/30/85 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 800040 LIQUOR PURCHASE 1,212.44 19214 06/90/95 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 800040 WINE PURCHASE 2.453.20 3, 068.72 •C 18215 00/30/95 RON'S ICE COMPANY 800041 WINE PURCHASE 1,380.26 10216 08/30/95 SERVICE SALES COR POR 800042 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIE 16.08 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 07/03/95 07:57:01 Disbursement Journal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Cl LIQUOR CHECKING 18217 06/30/95 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 800045 MIX FOR RESALE 18217 06/30/95 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 800045 CLEANING SUPPLIES 18218 06/30/95 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 PARTS FOR SHELVES 18218 06/.30/85 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 BEER PURCHASE 18218 08/30/95 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800049 NONALCOHOLIC BEER 18219 06/30/95 TWIN CITIES FLAG SOU 800049 NEW FLAG 18220 06/30/95 VIKING COCA-COLA BOT 800051 POP PURCHASE LIQUOR CHECKINGTOTAL 188.35 7.61 195.96 37.76 34,885.60 371.05 35,294.41 191.69 782.53 120,950.26 *CF •C► 8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 13:52:07 Disbursement Journal 11I_07/06/95 `..ARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL LIQUOR CHECKING 18218 06/30/85 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 CHECK VOIDED 34.886..60CR 18218 06/30/95 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 CHECK VOIDED 371.056R 18218 06/30/95 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 CHECK VOIDED 37.76CR 35.294.41CR *C1- CF18221 1622106/30/95 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 SHELF PARTS/SUPPLIES 37.76 18222 06/30/95 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 BEER PURCHASE 34,885.60 18222 06/30/95 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 'NON ALCOHOLIC BEER 371.05 35.256.65 •Ch 18223 06/30/95 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 800036 CABLE/NEM COOLER 15.66 18224 06/30/95 CONSOLIDATED COMM OI 900163 ADVERTISING 40.25 10225 06/30/95 MONTICELLO TIMES 800032 ADVERTISING 111.00 18226 06/30/95 CITIZENS NEWSPAPER 800183 ADVERTISING 91.80 10227 06/30/95 GARTNERS OFFICE PROD 800182 OFFICE SUPPLIES/STAMPE 10.55 18228 06/30/95 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUT 800009 BEER PURCHASE 20,700.35 10228 06/30/95 OAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUT 1800009 NONALCOHOLIC BEER 324.70 21,025.05 *Ch LIQUOR CHECKING TOTAL 21,294.31 S[kdm 300 Park Plate Fast 61]-696.6776 MEMORANDUM as)&— �ycOn 5776 Wayrah Bailevard FAX 57533776 IM. MUmteap0lb, A�4J 66116.1778 FAX 596-677 'POs Honorable Mawr OW Qq Councu Members FROM: Bret A. Weiss, P.E. - Qty 6agloeer DATES Jaly 20. 1995 SUWKM Council Update - Mondaft Qty Council Trunk Storm Sewer Modification Rhw Mill Subdivision OSM Project No. 498023 Tice Rim Mill Subdivision. located on east CSAH 39. has been platted in a manner which biaeets the drainage patter between the stormwater culvert which provides future drainage control for the area and the majority of the stormwater located primarily west of the driveway. Because of this. certain improvements are necessary to be constructed with the project in order to connect the stormwater culvert to the drainage system. The developer has constructed several ponds in the area to restrict the rate of stmorwater discharge from his property to an aoeeptable rate. Futuro development of the A Glorious Church site will require swallng through that site to collect startnwater from the Hawks Bar ditch, as well as other future development sites located in the quadrant between CSAH 7S, C SAH 39, and the River Mill Subdivision Because of the necessity of this improvement. and the fact that it consists of a trunk storm sewer system improvement, the City staff has negotiated a method of dealing with the costs in order to have the Installation completed by the developer's contractor. The proposed total construction cost is approximately $27,000.00 with S1S,5X00 spread to the developer -and SII,5M00 assumed as City responsibility. When the original culvert was installed, the Mr. Krautbauer stated he did not want to be assessed for the culvert as he would never receive any benefit from it. Therefore, the City did not assets Mr. Krautbauer for his share of the culvert Since that time, the City has allocated a portion of the culvert capacity to the industrial park storm sewer system, which was am previously connected to the culvert or considered in the design capacity. As such, the amount allotted to the River Mill project. formerly Mr. Krautbauces property, was sigaiSuntly reduced. Because some runoff was going to be discharged into the culvert, we included fi8,000.00 in the developer's agreement as a payment to the City for River Mill's use of the culvert. Those funds are proposed to be utilized to offset a portion of the City's costs, leaving a balanea of approximately $3.SM00, which the City could credit to Mr. Murry for stag expenditures associated with the project. In a related item in the future. the C iiy will treed to develop a location to allow ponding during the extreme year events just outside of the inlet to the 54 inch pipe. The River Mill development has currently developed a pond new the lift station site, and A Glorious Church will meed to construct a pond in that approximate location upon the future llsli wN.+rtaNsv+l�+ra1 JLL 21 '95 1327 OSM PPLS. MV �•� FJoacrable Maroc and City Comua7 Members City of MODUCOHO July A 1995. P{4ge 2 dgelopmeat of their site. Mae Cit fs 1 ft stadon site wet considered as a you Wa residential buMling site wben it was origttmlly purftsed, bowmm. Out to the plans to pond around the site6 the area outside of the It station Umhq would provide an excellent location for the Wet to the 54 ind pipe. Because the comrsetor is. auremly In the area at this time„ we would Igo to regrade the rear of the lift station site in a • manm dw would accommodate hau" ase o1 the property as a ponding area At this Bina,• the davdopet would lnma temporary storm sewer outlet adjacem to the llR station coat lot lana to drain the ponding area into the Cou W ditch. U tlhis is aeapta * a Itisd oast could be daterimined for the storm ponding am and then spte;aad to the indatrial part stormwater district along with tbo other proposed expeaditures. '!he City engineer 1•. the app"Oudinsb herein and rcgnm your approval to•mnve forward. CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTHLY BUILDING DEPARTMENT REPORT MONTH OF JUNE 1996 PERMITS & USES This Sams Month Last Yew Thts Yaw PERMITS ISSUED month Arm Lew Year To Data To Dela RESIDENTIAL Number 29 29 99 104 �. Vatua0on 91,034,600.00 61 M6,600 00 $3.184.600.00 113.383.300.00 Fees $9,130.75 {8,988.32 $23.343.78 634,491.35 Stack. $514.30 $610.79 $1,577.54 $1,871.92 COMMERCIAL N[slrber a 3 18 23 va4Olbrt 693.00000 $108.600.00 $578.900.00 {1,456.060.00 Fees {1,108.83 61,38881 $8.088.19 $12.277.21 Sudwalls $45.75 $54,30 $297.95 $717.50 NMUSTRIAL Ninbsr 1 3 10 5 Valua00n $82,000.00 $83.000.00 $1,159.40000 $717000.00 Fen $885.77 $784.15 $8.107.01 $5,415.30 &-hwpes $48.00 $41.50 $579.45 {359.50 PLI MMNO Hul cm 12 14 46 45 Too 9576.00 "24.00 111221.00 12,217.00 &-harges $8.90 $7.6D SM.90 922.60 MECHANICAL Nunber 13 IV NA 49 Fees $500.50 $2.013.60 PEMIT 195-2579 &-ha0e $6.50 $24.50 dated 3/16/91 rao cancelled ao the -.to vote oobtranted OTHERS frog the year to date. *101601 1 0 3 3 VahAOon $$1.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fen $1000 $000 630A0 $210.00 -%6, fir s $0.64. Hp $150 90.50 TPIA6lyEFWJS 92 41171 1 TOTAL VALUATION �,1.__MW {t.116R000pr_{�922_.p" J411r1" TONAL FEES _ $12.321.65 i11.698.26._9�T�787.BB t58.82!..�Q TOTALSURCHAROES $81905 $71368 i2.479A4 $2.795.12 4URRIENT MONTH FEES NUMBER -O PATE PFRMILNAIURE Numbp fplrlr. SwprsrOf VOAPPr TMS YOM Lany9gr SNW Family 11 {8,581.16 $495.30 9980,ODD .OD 35 25 041*0 0 0 0 M1114Fam9y 0 0 0 C0mmorcW 0 $0,00 $0,00 90.00 4 1 kl&MVW 0 1 1 Roa.Oarnes 0 3 3 Sans 0 0 Pk mop, 1b 0 $000 60.00 $0.00 0 2 ALTERATKMIREPAIR Dwattimpa 11 $444.60 $10.50 {33.40000 48 41 Commsrew 8 61,108,83 $45.75 $93,000.00 18 17 610ua6[al 1 {998.71 $4.00 {82.000.00 4 2 PLIAISINO Al typos 12 857600 66.00 45 30 MECHANICAL 0 AN In= ACCESSORY 13 $500.60 $8.50 40 NM STRUCTURES sivirmtv Poob 0 0 Docks 7 6106,00 63,60 {10,60000 to 0 MOVING PERMIT 2 0 TEMPORARY PEFUT 0 0 0EMSWTK7N L�-11 44 1444 11 ,z IWALS _ _ .92 __JIZ3RlN 5619cm $1 2. ialm00 P71. 13S JjwMtON.WK4