Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 04-22-1996AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, April 22, 1998 - 7 p.m. Mayor: Brad Fyle Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 8, 1996. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. 4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. b. Consent agenda. A. Consideration of resolution authorizing the application for a loan from the Public Facilities Authority for the wastewater treatment plant expansion project. B. Consideration of Arbor Day Proclamation and observance for Friday, April 26, 1996. C. Consideration of approving a temporary on -sale liquor license for Ducks Unlimited Banquet and Riverfest. Applicant, Monticello Lions Club. 6. Public Hearing. -Consideration of adopting proposed assessment roll for delinquent utility bills and certification of assessment roll to County Auditor. 7. Public Hearing --Consideration of an ordinance amendment revising hours of operation on Sundays for liquor license holders. S. Public Hearing. -Consideration of vacating Broadway Circle roadway and utility easements. 9. Consideration of adoption of development and disbursement agreements -- Prairie West development. 10. Consideration of a conditional use permit request which would allow development of an auto body collision repair facility in a B-3 (highway business) zone; and consideration of a variance to the hard surfacing requirement. Location is Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Plaza Partners. Applicant, Mike Zieska. Agenda Monticello City Council April 22, 1996 Page 2 11. Consideration of a request to assist Post Office in establishing an additional access. 12. Consideration to appoint an IDC representative to the EDA. 13. Consideration of proposals for replacing light fixtures in city hall and liquor store. 14. Consideration of ratifying union contract renewal. 16. Consideration of accepting staged odor control plan for Mississippi Shores. 16. Consideration of authorizing purchase of new street sweeper under state contract. 17. Consideration of approving bills for the month of April. 18. Adjournment. M[111 S REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, April 8,19% - 7 p.m. Members Present: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault Members Absent: None Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held March 2S 19AFi. Councilmember Perrault noted that Shirley Anderson seconded the motion for item #I I of the March 25 minutes. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD MARCH 25, 1996, AS CORRECTED. Motion carried unanimously. .o gid ra ion of adding item_g In the appn a. City staff member Wanda Kraemer requested a clarification of the February 26, 1996, Council motion authorizing fireworks for the Riverfest celebration. She reported that the Lions Club requested that they be allowed to choose the company for displaying the fireworks, as they felt they could obtain a better price. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO AMEND THE MOTION REGARDING RIVERFF.ST FIREWORKS TO STATE THAT THE CITY AUTHORIZES DISPLAY OF FIREWORKS AT THE RIVERFEST CELEBRATION AT A COST NOT TO EXCEED $8,000. Motion carried unanimously. It was the consensus of Council to strongly recommend to the Lions Club that the fireworks display be held on Saturday evening of the Riverfest celebration. John Bichler requested that Council claril� whether their previous denial for a 6112 roof pitch for his proposed home in the Eastwood Knoll subdivision also included denial of issuance of o building permit. Page 1 O Council Minutes - 4/8/96 He noted that his proposed house plans meet all city ordinances but not the covenants; therefore, he requested that the minutes include whether or not a building permit was also denied. Building Inspector Gary Anderson noted that a building permit would be denied in any subdivision where the proposed structure did not meet the covenants. A. Cnng6deratinn of a conditional use permit rerequest which would allow development of a n -bay quick tube facility-Appli an D n nd Linjig Mielke. Recommendation: Approve the conditional use permit allowing a 3 -bay quick lube oil facility provided that the facility meets all the conditions outlined by ordinance and subject to the following additional conditions: Completion of a landscaping plan that is consistent with code requirements. Completion of site grading and drainage plan that is acceptable to the City Engineer. The conditional use permit is subject to staff review and approval of the architectural design of the structure. If staff believes that the design does not meet the requirements of condition t12, then staff is directed to bring the matter back before the Planning Commission for additional review. Approval is based on the finding that the quick lube oil facility use and associated site plan are consistent with the character of the B-3 zone, and the site plan meets conditions as outlined by ordinance and additional conditions as required by Council. Co aid ration of a con itionnl use permit request. which would allow three or more .gin ss gi_gag on n commercial huHrling. Appliennt._ Stephen Conra . Recommendation: Approve the conditional use permit which would allow three or more business signs on a commercial building. Approval is based on the finding that the pylon sign proposed is consistent with city code and meets all city requirements. Page 2 G Council Minutes - 4/8/96 Consideration of a resolution necep ineundated feaFtihility study and authorizing preparation of plana and specifications - Briar Oakes Estate Second Addition - Proiert 96-02C. Recommendation: Adopt a resolution accepting the updated feasibility study and authorizing preparation of plans and specifications for Briar Oakes Estate Second Addition subject to the developer providing a deposit in an amount equal to the approximate cost to complete the plans and specifications. SEE RESOLUTION 96-12. D. Consideration of a rea_olution approving plana and ypecifieationa and authorizing advertisement for bids - Proiect 9R -01C. Dundas Road extension. Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for Project 96-01C, Dundas Road extension. SEE RESOLUTION 96-13. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS RECOMMENDED. Motion carried unanimously. Building Inspector Gary Anderson reported that Lenny Haberman, operator of Lenny and Jim's Bait Shop, and Dean Rasmussen, owner of the Glass Hut property, request permission to allow Haberman to display and sell up to six boats outside of the structure, including items such as fishhouses in the winter. The request also included permission for outside storage. The site is currently a lawful, nonconforming use, with the parking lot, landscaping, and outside storage arrangements in violation of city code. It was noted that when intensification of a nonconforming use is requested, the nonconforming aspects of the site need to be brought up to code. Under the plan as prepared, the applicants request that they be allowed to establish their outside sales area with the goal of phasing -in completion of site improvements. Anderson noted theta concrete sidewalk would be installed as an entrance to the bait shop and Glass Hut, landscaping would he installed between the sidewalk and building, and the existing sign would be moved closer to the intersection of Highway 26 and Marvin Road to encourage customers to use that entrance rather than the Sandberg Road/Highway 25 intersection. The outside storage would remain but would include screening. The applicants requested at least three years to install the required bituminous paving and parking improvements, including curb and gutter. In the interim, it was proposed that additional crushed granite be added to the drive areas as needed. Pago 3 �, Council Minutes - 4/8/96 The Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit with conditions, including that bituminous paving and parking improvements be installed by July 1, 1999. City Engineer Bret Weiss noted that MN/DOT has plans for upgrading Highway 25 in 1997 and are requesting additional funding for a four -lane highway all the way to Kjellbergs Park. If the project goes through, he noted that it was very possible that improvements would also be made at that time to the unimproved Marvin Road right-of-way. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS ALLOWING OUTSIDE STORAGE AND OUTSIDE SALES AT THE GLASS HUT SITE SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF A PLAN FOR PHASING IN ALL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY CODE, WHICH INCLUDE: A. Bituminous paving and parking improvements, including curb and gutter, must be installed at the time Marvin Road is improved but no later than July 1, 1999. B. Immediate installation of required landscaping. C. Installation of a screening fence around the perimeter of the storage area. D. Immediate installation of curb along the Highway 25 side of the property. E. Crushed granite must be applied to all drive areas. F. Outside sales is limited to six spaces. Motion is based on the finding that the proposed use is consistent with the character and nature of the B-3 zoning district and the neighborhood in general. Motion carried unanimously. ro aide ration of npproving final plat of tho Prairie West suhdiviion repint- Appliennt Jol+n Komarek. John Komarek requested that Council approve the final plat of the Prairie West subdivision. It was noted that Council approved the preliminary plat of the replat of this subdivision contingent upon adjustments being made to accommodate the setbacks, vacation of Broadway Circle, and conditions of the PUD. Komarek was also granted setback variances for four lots along the railroad right-of-way. Page 4 a, Council Minutes - 4/8/96 The final plat included vacation of Broadway Circle, lessening of the variances along the railroad side of the property, and reduced density to make a less congested development. The City would continue to have easement rights for access to sanitary sewer and water main. In addition, it was also noted that Komarek has been working with the City Administrator and HRA to develop a second phase for extending the project into neighboring properties. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF THE PRAIRIE WEST FIRST ADDITION SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Review and approval of utility, roadway, grading, and drainage plans by the City Engineer. 2. Execution of a development agreement outlining project financing. Komarek would obtain bank financing with the City securing the funds for the project through a disbursement agreement. 3. Completion of a site landscaping plan and parking plan acceptable to City stall. 4. Preparation of Prairie West Association bylaws. b. Final plat approval subject to the vacation of Broadway Circle. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of adopting design Alandards and trunk Rtorm sewer fi formula. City Engineer Bret Weiss reported that the Council previously approved in concept the development of a trunk storm sewer fee program which would allow the City to capture funds necessary to construct trunk storm sewer improvements. The purpose of the fee program is to avoid situations where development occurs upstream prior to completion of downstream improvements. The proposed program would allow for collection of storm water in large basins rather than on individual lots, which would focus maintenance activities in fewer areas and should result in lower maintenance costs in the long run. After considerable study, it was found by the City Attorney, City Engineer, and City staffthat the cost to build storm water conveyance systems was relatively consistent throughout the five watersheds that drain to the river; Pago 5 D Council Minutes - 4/8/96 therefore, a uniform charge was established throughout the developing areas for access to trunk storm sewer. The fee program as proposed included costs based on the construction of the actual facilities needed to manage storm water and also includes land acquisition costs. The formula used to calculate the land value would be based on the City's estimation of the cost to acquire land plus an additional administrative expense associated with the possibility of condemnation. Weiss noted that the difference between the sanitary sewer/trunk water main charges and the proposed trunk storm sewer fees is that the trunk storm sewer fee would be based on a net acre basis, which includes only the actual land that can be developed minus wetlands, parks, etc. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ADOPT THE TRUNK STORM SEWER FEE GUIDELINES AND ASSOCIATED FORMULA FOR CALCULATING FEES AS PROPOSED. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of awa_rdine bids for Pmiect 96-ORC. RefurbLhment of We ig #1 and #3 - Public Works Director John Simola reported that five bids were received for refurbishment of deep well pumps #1 and M3 ranging from a total base bid of $12,083 to a high of $26,301. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO ACCEPT THE LOW BID AND AWARD THE CONTRACT TO ALBERG WATER SERVICES OF ELK RIVER. Motion carried unanimously. Thera being no farther business, the meeting was adjourned. Karen Doty Office Manager Page 6 (2) Council Agenda - 4/22/96 Consideration I resolution authoriAng the application for so loan from tho Public Facilities Authority for the wastewater treatment plant 1: 1 I 111 :IM As part of the wastewater treatment plant expansion project, financing for the $10+ million project has been planned through a loan from the Public Facilities Authority through the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. The stab', along with our engineer on this project, HDR, is nearing the completion of the second part of our loan application, which will soon be submitted to the Public Facilities Authority for approval. As part of the loan request documents, a local government resolution needs to be adopted by the City Council authorizing the Mayor and/or City Administrator to act on behalf of the City in completing any necessary documents for the loan. This resolution is simply a housekeeping matter at this point in the application process, and the Council will be advised of any additional requirements we have to meet. Adopt the resolution which indicates the City has the legal authority to apply for the loan and that the Mayor or City Administrator are authorized to execute any necessary documents for the loan. Do not adopt the resolution. As this is the financing alternative we have been assuming we would be using for the WWTP expansion project., 1 recommend the resolution be adopted so that the application can be formally submitted. It is anticipated that loan proceeds through the PFA will save the City approximately 1112% to 2% interest over conventional borrowing alternatives. l i I Copy of proposed resolution for adoption. Forms Package � Local Government Resolution (FP -22) Pic FaciGNes Autbadly /r r City of Monticello RESOLUTION OF APPLICANT. Applimrn haat dop and submit the followlg nzotutlw► This n=hnim aas4 be depted pia to Ademboloo of the form package BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Monticello act in die legal spaaar forprojat(s) wnlg d in the Bushtm W Community DEvlIOpfllUlt iCni011 to be submaw mtand that they City Adminletrator is hereby authorised to apply to the Department of T1ade amd Ecersanic Devekoprmuni for fund. ofthis pkoject°onm` Ialf of the City of Monticello Tea WW) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED thathge�ity of Monticello has the legal authority to apply forfirnaMal resistance. and the hWltutmal, managerial. andrca) eapablllty to eruure adequate coamualan, operation, mat meunce W replacement of the proposed project fa Its design life. BE R FURTHER RESOLVED Uw the City of Monticello hu not viotnod any fid, Saue, or local tars rAgrrw/ pertaining to frond, bribery. graft. kickbacks, collusion cellist of hancu or other unlawful or comp practice. BE ITFURTHER RESOLVED tut upon approval of iu applies, by the Ane, the City of Monticello may erg bwanagroamemwitkthe State ofMimhaw for die abovetderacolpojetis).t 'the City of Monticallo cert lks dw it will comply with rega l applIcii laws l regulnlam as Acid W wgcana a in cmact Fecinc p ku W dela ilpcks on die Compliances Section (FP•20) of the Btuhness and C inanmlty Development Application NOW.THEREIDREBEITRBSOLVEDUw the City Adminiotrator ishereby autumiscdtoexecute I' aur Aw ur (nUWI mch agewwm asare mxessary to impkmeru the poject(s) om tg& of the applkam. I CERTTFY THAT the above mmkmh7n wet adopaed by the City Council of the City of Monticello on April 22. 1996 rA/prrwl ro..t SIGNED: WT17NESSED. rAWMWmnyu+ep (av+rv.t Me or City Adminintrator 112; UAM) n,*t IUw) .54 I- Council Agenda - 4/22/96 Last year, as part of our efforts toward reforestation and citizen awareness of the value of planting trees, the City of Monticello Council declared April 28, 1995, as Arbor Day. A small celebration and ceremony was held in Ellison Pask and a tree was planted. The City of Monticello has met the requirements for the "Tree City U.S.A. Program" for several years. The City met the requirements for 1995 by having an organized tree board (park board) or department, a community tree ordinance, and a tree or forestry program which is supported by at least $2 per capita. By proclaiming an Arbor Day observance, the City completes its requirements and can apply for the Tree City U.S.A. Program and is eligible for the Forestry Grants Program. We all know the benefits of planting trees for shade and beauty for the next generation. I would like the City to again consider proclaiming April 26, 1998, as Arbor Day and again hold a small tree planting ceremony in one of ou.r parks. The first alternative is to proclaim Friday, April 26, 1996, as Arbor Day and observe it by having a small tree planting ceremony in one of the parks. The second alternative is not to proclaim Arbor Day for 1996. C- STAFF RFcn MF.NDATIDN: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council proclaim Arbor Day observance as outlined in alternative 01. D- SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the proclamation. PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Minnesota's forest treasures were a significant attraction to early settlers because of their usefulness and the beautiful environment they provided; and WHEREAS, trees are an increasingly vital resource in Minnesota today, enriching our lives by purifying air and water, helping conserve soil and energy, creating jobs through a large forest products industry, serving as recreational settings, providing habitat for wildlife of all kinds, and making our cities more liveable; and WHEREAS, human activities such as construction damage and pollution, as well as disease and insects, threaten our trees, creating the need for concerted action to ensure the future of urban and rural forests in our state, country, and world; and WHEREAS, each year on the last Friday in April --Arbor Day--tho people of Minnesota pay special attention to the wonderful treasure that our trees represent and dedicate themselves to the continued health of our state's stock of trees; NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Brad Fyle, Mayor of the City of Monticello, do hereby proclaim April 26, 1996, to be ARBOR DAY and the month of May 1996 to be ARBOR MONTH in Monticello, Minnesota. Further, 1 urge all citizens to become more aware of the importance of trees to their well being, to participate in tree planting programs that will ensure n green Minnesota in decades to come, and to plant, nurture, protect, and wisely use Minnesota's great treasure of trees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of Clio City of Monticello to be affixed Chia twenty-second day of April in the year of our Lord Ono Thousand Nino Hundred and Ninety-six. Mayor Council Agenda - 4/22196 .,,:1,:.:,,, , Oj6 r The Monticello Lions Club will again be providing the concession services for the Ducks Unlimited Banquet scheduled for May 6 at the Monticello Roller Rink and will also be serving concessions at the Arts and Crafts Expo along with the Riverfest Celebration scheduled for July 6 and July 7, 1996, in Ellison Park. Last year the City Council, for the first time, issued a one -day temporary on -sale liquor license for both events that allowed the Lions Club to sell strong beer and wine coolers at all three events, and also approved a setup license for the Ducks Unlimited Banquet. In previous years, the Lions Club had only been issued a non -intoxicating beer license; but State Statutes now allow cities to issue temporary one -day liquor licenses. As part of the request last year, the Council also decided to keep the daily fee at $10, which was the same for a non -intoxicating beer license. The setup license for a one -day event has remained at $26. Council could approve the issuance of a temporary on -sale liquor license to the Monticello Lions Club for the Ducks Unlimited Banquet scheduled for May 6, the Arte and Crafts Expo in Ellison Park on July 6, and Riverfest Celebration on July 7. In addition, the approval will allow a setup license for the Ducks Unlimited Banquet. This approval should be contingent upon the Lions Club providing proper proof of liability insurance coverage and contingent upon payment of the required fee. Deny the license request. r_ STAFF R .O MFNDATION: I am not aware of any problems in the past with the Lions Club operating their beer or liquor sales and have no reason to recommend denial. Il_ cUPPORT NG DATA: License application for the events. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY P"Ot1E 012-790 0150 LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 333 SIBLEY • ST. PAUL, SIN 65101 SMP. vN4 m,�- -R-14y G, ; P9� APPLICATION FOR CONS TION AND DISPLAY (SET-UP) PERMIT A MAME ANO \DORETE 1/10MM AR[ MOT CORRICT. 10M OtAN0ES 0 WAVESMI. M. NOTE: ALL+ON-SALEr INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSEE'S ARE EXEMPT FROM APPLYMO. 4;_ Arsrw MrrwM �Cor\Ir Mvr�rlrwr wL~..�nK 4+73 4V 0(16N t cur u.r. roc». ///Ovl>Liefccd /t/In/ �Owwr. cls. 0—wr..rI•n»r,,.�t !%a mr iir/ ,v r'u - lav (r 1`�iG AEr« H lr.w Aan¢ r•vu 4L oiaEN'YJIi:I�'ii4i1'fAial4:�iilir�"��:"L�:.'"„ �oiLswLTN'ia"I'kowi�ili�L�:ilo'i+t'1'1�•1:1... ����•rv�W v.+ .\wNYKW.--1WrIM ly/ II..WYIY \W rYWYLP 4KWKUxww. wMI1W\IW�Y.WWt nw.n IrNMIIrUI. (.1 Pr Ir,MM. J IR11MElTRI.I rOrl A Ml1C OI111Mttlt 11 � rwlrw W r. CMr IM Nprr rntl AMNT W res+tirwr' N A Cesar How itwr h IMrr � AAYnI a1 r.N (Nils«. IIwIMr wpw/pNNw A/»w wrlMrr WrINr/W err A.rnr 1rwJrr MIAr/111Irr AE»rl TpA11 EIINA])ll r.Nr«w.» I..r.».«rw..wl I f•"- .er.\wmn.N. 7s wl�i'ro:l crawly,)7lo:.i«i lies r+ �"i "rT\wuw\"uN.r I;irn Lllw J1eW+/f/aa jrA�7,f,r, t11M1►:rrlh IwrNA.» AMns rrLLIN Has OppOwrt:Il ptrtr1md11p, any gw irm;11 corpm.tlon. any of If m or dlrocia; If MU 1, 1nY c1Ub offs m of dlrectm. trm Ind a tic., a ur4p the Mlntimts Lkww CoMtol Act revoked or wL11rH+dld or twm mwicted Im any villt+llon of State Lm" or Wnl ord4mx=; It p, Vltt date amf details NwrIM +wluY M. IM »rrrrwr4.-". l4V at rrwlM wrO wrwnwrrlrr NN Mob r4»wlw�w rlr lrYwre iWwW twIrNRNrIrIYrr MrNapll»MWMwM.ANY 1IlOMIl0EUE0NENEIMOER 1 I ALlOMT111 MlEW IN 10E1O1TNq LIlWp11. NO CONSIDERATION MILL IR GIVEN TO TIRO APPLICAI ION UNLESS APPROVED AS PROVIDED DELOMI Q� I x-.I�. '/•—Uw IF TNB BUSINESS IB LOCATED IN A COUNT VI Arw\w.-wN»rr c.Wwr r\r\».rrw..lrnn uw IF THE BUSINESS 11 LOCATED IN A MUNICIPALITY AFMtr1F-E .w he"m o Amposa.INIq tme. h 1111 OM1 IF A CLUB ATTACH A COPY OF 1116 OnICTRUTION AND BYLAWS UP 1111 CLUB AND A CURRENT LIST M MEMBERL CAW '� CHECK Council Agenda - 4/22/96 Public h . ring on ai d in cent utility bi Audito . (R.W., C.S.) The City Council is again asked to adopt an assessment roll for utility billing accounts which are delinquent more than 60 days and to certify the assessment roll to the County Auditor for collection on next year's real estate taxes if not paid by November 30, 1996. The delinquent utility accounts that are included with the agenda are accounts that are at least 60 days past due and include all new delinquents from the last time we certified them. In addition to the delinquent amount, the Council also previously approved the establishment of an administrative fee of $25 per account that is added to each delinquent assessment. The amounts shown on the enclosed delinquent utilities list include the additional $25 administration fee for the preparation of the assessment roll. It is recommended that the delinquent accounts be put on an assessment roll for certification in 1997 at an interest rate of 8% as allowed by state statute. As in the past, if any accounts are paid within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll, they can be paid without the additional interest. After 30 days, payments will be charged interest and can be accepted up to November :30,1996. 1. Adopt the assessment roll for the delinquent charges as presented. 2. Based on public hearing input, adjust the assessment roll as required. C. STA_FFREVOMMFNDATION: It is staff recommendation that the Council adopt the assessment roll as presented. All of the accounts are at least 60 days past due and have been given proper notice of this assessment hearing and ample opportunity to pay the accounts in W. All utility accounts were notified that there would be an additional $25 administrative fee attached to each outstanding balance if the account wa►s not paid by 4:30 p.m. on April 15, 1996. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution adopting assessment roll; Complete listing of delinquent accounts to be certified. DTC A. 1555 DEIC OTIEITV C- I aiTI7ICATI016 OTN LATE Out' E•.� + A=mr, 1 PID t Praxrt� Ad0rns ADT CuA=r Km Cult 022 2 O.r70 GaI Orr60 0a/ OrrI3 Gal WIN Day Ute TOUT 1 fist Die Pan Due Past Cm tall Due Dage ./tate OW21 0010026610/) ISSUCCO11110 211 RIVER S1 E KLI[ SAlOCIm PO 031 1505 5:.62 .00 .00 A IS.0 77.59 001001501)01) 155040MIND 22! LIVER ST 5 gCINEL PELARSIU WI MAR LASE CD 0.95 .00 .00 .00 15.01) 115.0 OOICOiM100 155010055x0 307 LIVER S, Y PATTY PMRS 30 RML $T V 179.41 .00 .00 .00 15.00 154.41 00100150000 1550101111x0 107 MIT 11 am CICE 101 P0O 37 V 91.91 .00 .00 .00 2S.W 116.67 001005)0007 ISSOIOMMIC 111 CIVI117 V VOO1 MEMN 40 CMR 91 V 47.71 .00 .00 .00 25.00 17.71 i oo76117am tsso10a4Im 124 UVEI ST V 410011 WN 126 RMR ST V 47.11 .00 Do o1) 25.00 12.11 00101170000 255010067140 706 RMI 91 E OWTILLE KrT(WLL 10 LM1 M I 10.17 .00 .00 .00 25.03 15.72 OOlolx 001) ISSOIW25150 124 CIVII 9T E mm [ECIN 126 RIVER 9T E 111.71 .00 .00 .00 75.0 011.26 001011701)00 Ibk115001170 US CIVIL S1 E CRAB Kula 60 CMI 911 22.11 .00 .00 .00 25.00 47.17 00211633 b 155015MW10 W CMACVAI E PETER / C1CU 0490 40 IIWOVA7 E I06.12 .00 .00 .W 15.00 121.12 o17p1707D0 155015173010 155 CRO7WAY E 5{1[01+ LA3fOC7 PD Lot 1517 410.11 .0 .00 ,W 75.00 435.19 0=1111200 I51010049D50 412 CROMVAV N JEABD'/tIUMA 001100 PO EM 415 11,11 .01) .CO .41) 25.CD 11.51 002000000 ISWIC01117O tic = $1 LM CR RAC] OEOAWS PO 1771 41 W.11 .00 .m .01) 25.00 t05. It 001W17= 1SS02=111 1011 CR7AOW7 V EOOW DKYTLY2YV 1911 CLCWVAI V 05.20 .00 .00 .0 75.00 110.20 00201CI= ISSDIEA106o IM 1101 Ci JA11U T4LE1 to EM 1075 Com .W .00 .126 25. IT lob." 0010111171.1 O5DICOIE751 m IPJAVT SY 3107 4r PO 111 4% 0.14 .113 .CO .Y 2S.CD 07.4 CW0176000:1 15s0O0s170 146 CM04V V CUATMIV YWO1 LTD t% IUfOQ;! CVD ri.30 .00 .00 .61) S.CD 40.10 CD70141=1 ISWIOO Op 117 C1DAOVA7 Y TICE PARTY PLC PD 1711 p 11.47 40 .00 .=0 ri.0 51.0 0:71.1WOOD 0501=05070 101 Crzmv V 641 =CLE (SALON IICPIDILL) ►1.40 .0 .OD .CD Is.0 19.0 O00144=0 215"oCcUl0 711 KEY IT TO1 SITTER $0 Col 271 91.15 .W .00 .00 25.00 115.03 .' eM0on0772 35010Mpt0 915 IW CT V TO1 VAI( to CD/ 2043 6I.S0 ,Co .00 .1)0 75.0 CS.&D Or1L70C>r17 ISp ID0f0f0 111 IW 67 V CLUM NmUTI 115 IW IT Y II.SA .00 .00 .00 ".00 112.54 0005110060 1650imcm 211 Upw 91 DOZ 5 Dmu KNIVIN 711 Ila CT 71.65 .CD 'CO .00 75.00 101.15 00100010.500 15600a10t0 115 IW 17 v BERT CALTNEI ITS IW /1 14.0 .W .00 .61 M.0 09.0 0M03u= ISSa100t0E7 Id 011c 714 CI CIO Km in OMEDIA tt 110.71 .OD .DO .OD 25.00 145.21 000070000 1550102W20 411 !LD IT V CWTI4 1 L110.ENE NW W CAI 152 C.43 .00 .00 .00 25.0 WAS 173=81 D lHOINIWW 111 ICD ST u MOT 1 V0011 CW PC ml Uts I$.91 .W .00 .0 14.W ED. 9) CUO M3003 450to0101p 100 IW tt E G04A sOr2T[07 to CAI 1071 MAI .W .00 .CD 20.07 10.01 0001110002 t6501►MIR7A 600 to Et I GAS KEVIEaN 600 EASY IW 61 71.41 .00 .OD .CA 15.00 09.41 074M&Y'OCO 755019WW20 )a$ 4TN IT E VATNE CM 105 43N OT E 17.21 .CO .0 .00 25.01) 117.75 e=X= 0'1100710)0 411 ►TN 11 V CR71ND4 Kitt$ (JAIIICI ULD) 41.11 .M .CO .00 15.00 71.11 Cams= 16C71DdYS0i 001 6TN ST V MR 7LR11L 101 5TR 97 Y (4104 .00 .00 41) 15.00 O1.06 GpG1C7C0i.7 16b02o07I:A 112 61N CT V J" liA my 174)0 IpIIAU AYE W 11,61 .00 .CO .00 25.0 41.0 C:40146I:C7 1':.72707710 1713 SCO1 U Cl=kl rOMEENI 1713 "1 LA 64,11 .M .00 .00 11.0 C/.il 0:6 iNc= 1!!!=)Am 1121 RMP t7 Y I 0 C=VIILI I::3 VVIR Ci V Il UZI .M .W .CO 3.0 171.0 Cu01UC=7 ISS=71Cr= 10 MTTICW Ut C[9Y0 FIAT P; 0:1 171) 1:1.11 .C3 .0 25.04 157.19 _ CYC^"= ffLnth= 1116 CIDAI El AIT,A V,a7Vtd 1170 am IT L'.0 ,p .0 .W 7510 PA.0 CIDl0. OU IEr_Sd726ol tin OAK= C2 f l ► V 4::1CIATE5 ► La CCKS 7'.11 4 .CP .G 25.0 40.03 Q 0."'0770.71) 05040=110 111 JERRY IIEF(Li 01 $1.7.2601) 4 GCC.17 11) JELLY Will U 7:.0! .0 .W .W it. C7 tal.61 CI6777�.:1 IY1<6I7Yd Ip CIvlN LDrUV Cl 3:.211, DKKDrL P3 E:l 1701 MCI .d .W .111 25.0 120.0 C'1tMC 1SS7:f:.Tr87 In IUM tLVn 0 'N0: J01C'.3I IM KIMV LIM W MID .d .0 .0 £L.L7 II7.M � 0,..1111= 05:7107157 121 CALM== CO LCCA 9EI14=3 PJ C:) its 11.01 .0 .0 .0 75.0 0.01 C=:7110^"..7 4'1'_'04727 It$ RAIU! 4 fal ESN 543 twill 0 71).65 .0 .0 .0 :'S.tD III.p OwG24C='C IL"119 1IJ 173 IC.LYIS LqG C ,1[77 III 1ALSYEN LWX C CIX .d .d .0 ::.d 07.15 Q C:=:3LY.7'..7 tll^:t^..lrn in CL7a'::It I. =1 L L. 1C1-3' IC: C'(xl.'3 (11 11,t4 .0 .W ,CO :S.0 0%ob CK"t_:.A :T.'Ya LLXZI:' P, Cl 425 11A9 .C3 .l'n .0 :S.0 91.47 CITY 0 4'VTlallt T 61J10�,. J.n.o) 077 t, 1985 [ElD UTItItY E,11 C[9TIFICAl1075 YI1N UlF 04" ACCOtInI t 7II 1 PrW-It/ AWISS APT Comer las co-, We 2 000 Oar Gr10 04r Otr90 Dn 011170 0AI let! tool n 1 Pati Dm 4r.. Dm Past Out PAS1 Our C -9e ./Utt :nage =a= Rsonm3ol0 I21 O1= la MY WIEEtG 229 Cc= U 77.17 .00 .00 .00 MAC 101.17 CWWB➢m09 t55075CO= 116 CRCCUS LA C6O7 tL" 116 Cf=$ U 62.17 .00 .00 .m 75.00 17.17 DMMC 09 N59nm10S0 Ni Ill" ELL10m Z PAN o"OCK 71+ t1ARYEN ELVJm W 53.30 .W .00 .00 25.00 11.10 ltmouc0D 115015001100 730 Ott4Y111 ELVDOD I9 DO &D VZ 230 NALNN ILVn CD 11.11 .00 .00 .00 16.00 101.11 =CID= ISS07Sm111D 226 III" ELHJm RD KATIE LMVAt NO RWIN 0.7001 9D 71.15 .00 .00 .00 25.00 107.15 00101110000 11SOn7011SD 719 VA" EIYDOD ED CINDY NXIUD 211 KEVIN EIM ED ISAS .DO .00 .00 M.m 120.65 n 00tOL1100101) 155315001111 114 KWIV ELWM RD LUDY AND TM10' WTCAL ATTN PATIICI USO- 102.40 .OD .00 .00 M.m 117AD 0"IMMO760 IS5O)1001010 141 1914W LA J114S CEILETTI III P.IDIW LA 111.05 .OD .00 .13 25.00 11/.00 on26Dtoa osollm4otc 115 KW41N u tE1o41N FZS2E11 In KMW LA 1%.11 .00 .00 .00 2s.00 111.17 "*== 115071001050 t0i MUKN+ U UVID/AK.1I PO.ERZY, 100 NIDW a 67.41 .CO .00 .00 75.01 VAT ==cm IS5O)60D1050 log OWN nVOW 9D K (E A -A" %RTE 101 KknU ELVXD M 52.67 .00 AO .m 25.00 $7.62 MOL4200OD 5503mm 715 RW uI ID 00W WEISN 80 94) 1117 30.11 .00 .00 .m MCI 5511 CMI=Em ISS9)Im11R Il Swno a; BIAD KLATT is £MDTID en 22.11 .00 .00 .00 25.0 41.77 0301620009 O5W7m1110 I £NI -TRAP Cll Blll 1 t2Y G2IGBY 1 £u1OTWP CIR 99.70 .00 .O1.` .00 15.00 114.70 0101355mO0 IS5014031110 m 0WISEIPPI OR %*94A WAIM110 2% KISMIMI OR MOO .00 .00 61.12 IS.01 131.12 11000660000 1150t6m1350 )11 RIVIWIEV DO 110141 CALLIE/ 711 PI mEV DR 46.46 .00 .00 .00 MCI 71.46 otpucaaao 155011131045 610 RMAVIN CR IM 1 LOU WINCEIG 170 RIVEMEV CR TOM .00 A .m 26.13 104.66 WOVE1mO9 ISN61002M 6601 G1LL60 AA a K" 1 PAIt1C1A WIT 1641 GILLED AW K u.m .Do .00 .m MCI U.CO Q Dnmmmm 16SOLSCN09 MI RED 011 CIO KIDIAn %IPTER rat ao W CIR 1110.9 .00 .00 .00 75.00 155.9 111011009 115asm2m nm RID PAA CII MIN cE1111T = In CAt at $6.42 .Je .CD .m M.m 11.47 0llmu O0 155090010".0 2161 118104 LA GELATO: VIU44'IR I7811EAM LA 116.71 C. .00 .m 21.m 141.11 0 IC3514m ISSOM131000 1015 IYVTI-WI PL V 1O:Y 1 iO4 £IIlT4 IDIS Kkyt ODE R N 49.17 .00 AO .00 2 -.CD 14.11 111CI37cm 15501113)070 2040 on tiv.1 C9 STEVE 11%31 mo OU Wmt CR 11.71 .M .00 .m n.O 9.21 017=mO9 H5511115UW 1,7 UELI.MG'S PACD PAUL CAUO1 MI UILLCE4'1 PAEt 11.20 AO .00 .m MCD MID O12m om 1555mISUW 707 UntE 15 OAU BECIY PAI14IK6IL14 LE MI KAUCEWS P61 10.40 .CC .DD .G 2S.00 55.40 012commm 15551315UW 711 VILUEW! PARI{ OMI DA"Lum 711 Q1,111WE PIIP 11.M .0 .OD Am MCI 66.22 O1m16W170 155SMIWO) 716 WELLSM'6 WR K IMD I BARS SW 211 IJEUCEWS P61 51.77 .0 .00 .m ISM 51.20 IUC:2G oI 15E501wc) 710 UnLLR, 1, WiK 4JILLMU'I )K (Elio COOICdt) 30.13 .00 .00 .m 75.93 65.11 11n32200OJ 155501W.1) IN YAUDEr,16 PArA JKKS AWI11 MCI KIYtRS MCD Z .00 AO MCI 45.11 61"10= 11:5p16WQ IID UtILL1IG'9 FAIT A EO4O6t[411 110 KALUI4'S PARI( 11.110 .0 Co. .GO 21.0 Es. ID 01285 C3;3 1555015UW Ip LAILCE97'6 PART PAIL NSOUVII IV IJELUEG'S P67 11.20 .m log .00 HAD 51.20 OI)MIMOD 0.5m1544W IDL UELL 'S PAU CTAD PE$OV PC CJS 1741 IDA& .00 .00 .CO 2S.0 16.10 IIMJII m 155501%6t) I 1JULEM4 PARI EIIEEN 1101ART1.4 I IJILLak3'S DARK 10.40 X3 .Cc .CO M.03 15.40 11X79003 liEW15uW ) VELLWO'S PAD Jas EIO1N 7 K.ILLCIVS P61 )I.M .CC .00 AS 25.0 U." 11INSIC333 ISRSmINAV I UnLEEWS PARK VUKI NLIM 1 9ALLaWs PARK 11.61 .C, .00 .Co 25.0 56.11 10ccem 0 ItLmI WW 1 1JIILU71'1 PAD 1O1 ML 7 R.2LLSIq'1 PUY ::.CD .61 .60 .p M.p 4S.0 a OIIm=03 1555001541,01 I UULCEIVS WEK IALLCEWS Il: I MNA CUM) ID.M .m .0O 100 25.60 n.m II M 72:3>p IS•_5p1544W APl 1 Unl7EL11 PARR AJILLEI4'1 IK IC'i TWO "A .W .a .IR n.m Es.0 0120.20:3.31 15.5111544:7 Il AALLUQ'^. 0AU AALLEER7'6 99 IGAIL OW! MCI .M .Cl .m M.0 MCI 017:_F1G� IS'_SCISYG7 21 UlltU4'6 CAU' ACCP FICIN 71 VILM14'S RAU 11.00 .OD .Co M MQ M.M 01XJGI= 15L 41ACI 110 UnLE9315 PASA 1.011 VAUD 6 9C25 U1 110 WIMM'S WN 1110 .GO .C: .C/ M.C." 3514C OCC' ISS,SpII"Q 116 KJIILLU3'S r U A10RIPIWI(1 SII IU1l1UG'E 1011 n.0 .p .CD .p MCI 4!.G 017JtG]�D 11=1$140 407 UELLEr'- PAU KIP PE11191 40 U-11013'6 qq7 ICA, a .0 4 75.4 15.40 01E11 ;-_W 45wlbYW EOL unLEEE311 PAD E11TY U:rnw to 641tWG'I $61 I'.M .c .CD .CD 510 25.:3 IIICJCSUm IE :700)0!] SOC, £TA.11*3 GR DWS 1 M MORI = 1.16.1207 CA p,1.: .a X2 .0 75.11 G7.10 OI)CIIr:m MINJU)IO r_a ara n LMA (LIN 9:91 a4N a 47.91 A: CO co 3.0 0.01 CUE'_:. 0 15u1C:.att1 LAC ITAI.IN: CP N6PJ_ LIKEALA 134, f1AE,lo: CI CJ110 .m .Co .07 73.c 111.)5 .� ECT4 9 %A.'I]LLG 04/16 1.)1.03 [UTIrICA71MC V11M LATI CNU4E AKGurtt 1 RIC 1 /rcwxr AEQell 013mBSmm 155011m31m 5370 FALCON AVE 0t3m09mm 1SWSm)+40 5430 IACCM AVC 01103040000 155090021m 5521 FALCON AVE n 01303mmm 165071001110 5451 FALCON AVE 01300100000 1550=7010 SW NArTIN OR 0303"= 155069007070 MD MM DN OR ., 9mo1150100 155010006+10 13C 9R wav Y 9030170200 155"0003030 33+ 310 SI t 90301+90100 165015077000 301 "N''TON $T ' m5G5401m 155010001010 Sri 61M 31 V 9m016501m 15$04tm10m $15 WIT ST 9050/690100 165041C0p10 $77 VRIGN3 LT 9401130+00 +s501T0:0 O $21 LOWY ST 1m01050"im Ism m+070 701 71N I E rINAL TOIA.3 MAL .)Lx' IG 41 JILL WVVUJS r r r r A E N E� O I 3 1 1 0 3 1 A A r A A .00 .00 C 75.00 OTC 4, 199! Cf E [UTIrICA71MC V11M LATI CNU4E J 3 LO UTILITY ` ACT Cmt=l hal Ca: Ni'Y 1 Orr30 Wr 0Af60 WA OAr90 Cal Orr 110 OAr Lst Total / Pari IV.. Par. 0u part Gla Past Gut :Wgr ./Late C0a•3e JILL WVVUJS 5110 FALCM AVE ti 1.94 .00 .00 .CO 75.00 16E.14 91C"15PINDA WR50 SIO TALCM AVE 51.59 .11 .00 .m 15.00 11.76 NIRR AM 5571 FALCDl AVE 11.60 .00 .00 .00 Mm 103.90 JAC00U NE LAVALLF 5651 FALCON AVE 14.11 .m .00 A 25.00 41.10 OM 0001 5040 1NRTDI OR 35.54 .m .00 .m 15.00 60.56 LAURIE IMP RD E41 004 15.11 .m .00 .00 15.00 Le. it ON am 00 (NUKE S" - REMIER) 31.10 .00 .00 .m 15.00 50.70 UP JAKS kwo (Lr1ER ART) 70.10 .00 .m .00 71..00 As& 3 00A11 WILSON 101 VA9(IKTOI ST 10.40 .00 .00 .00 75.00 15.40 SO PUL TOM CLMN 700 6 NRIN 10.10 .00 .00 .m 15.00 WID TMD NRLSM 515 WET ST 70.10 .m .00 .m 75.00 43.00 CDMI OL15TtR 5» N11Can sl 10.40 .00 .m .00 MCI; 75.10 RAa DAVIS Ra CD3 654 10.40 .m .00 Ac 21.00 15.40 6 WIM RRO:fUlls (CAMH TA"t) WOO .60 .00 .m 15.0 75.00 411.10 .11 .00 11.11 1.700.00 9.009.40 :TIT OF N)n1CltiG Council Agenda - 4/22196 Current ordinances regulating hours of operation for liquor sales on Sundays indicate that no sales can occur before 12:00 noon. State statutes allow Sunday sales of liquor within a restaurant, club, bowling alley, or hotel with seating capacity for at least 30 persons to begin sale of liquor at 10 a.m. on Sundays provided the licensee is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean Air Act and provided the City Council amends the local regulations to allow 10 a.m. sales after one public hearing on the ordinance amendment. When Mr. Rob Hoffman recently acquired ownership of J.P.'s Annex, he inquired as to whether the City of Monticello would allow him to offer a Sunday morning brunch that would include the availability of liquor before noon. As a result of Mr. Hoffman's request, the only way the City can allow this to occur is to amend our ordinances by holding a public hearing on the question. A public hearing notice was published regarding the Council's discussion of this possible ordinance amendment; and if the Council does not have a problem with allowing sales to occur at 10 a.m. rather than noon on Sundays, you may do so after receiving any public comment that may be presented at Monday nighCs meeting. As a reminder, if the ordinance is amended, all Sunday liquor license holders would have the ability to serve liquor from 10 a.m. until 1 a.m. Monday morning. After closing the public hearing, the Council could adopt an ordinance amendment allowing Sunday liquor license holders with at least 30 - person capacities to sell intoxicating liquor from 10 a.m. Sunday mornings in conjunction with the sale of food. 2. Council could decide not to amend the ordinance and leave Sunday sales Ca ^ beginning at 12:00 noon as in the past. r STAFF F 'O MRNDATICN: Tho staff does not have a recommendation on this request one way or the other, and we do not know of any reason why amending the ordinance would be a problem unless there aro concerns raised by the public at the meeting. Copy of proposed ordinance amendment. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS THAT ORDINANCE SECTION 8-2-8 (C) PERTAINING TO REGULATING HOURS OF OPERATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE HOLDERS BE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 3.2-8: CONDITIONS OF LICENSE: (C) Every licensee, except a private club licensee, shall not conduct business on the premises between the hours of one o'clock (1:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) a.m., Monday through Saturday inclusive, or on any Sunday between the hours of one o'clock (1:00) a.m. and twelve o'clock (12:00) noon, nor permit the presence of customers on the premises between the hours of one thirty o'clock (1:30) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) a.m., Monday through Saturday inclusive, or on any Sunday between the hours of one thirty o'clock (1:30) a.m. and twelve o'clock (12:00) noon; however, further provided that no intoxicating liquor may be sold or served on Sunday, whether directly or indirectly, except between the hours of ten o'clock (10.00) am. and one o'clock (1:00) am. Monday, and then only in conjunction with the serving of food to persons who are sealed at tables within licenaed premises having seating capacitie2 for food of at least 30 persons and provided the establishment is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean Air Act. Passed by the City Council this 22nd day of April, 1998. Mayor City Administrator 74 CuK�Gor' 0Kb1fJFNNcA� 3-2-7; PLACES 1NL•'L1G1bLL•: PUH L1C W4L;E: IJu uu-:;tele licLuau :,I,u11 Lro granted except after a public hearing has been held upon at least ten (10) days published notice of such hearing. The cost of said public hearing shall be borne by the applicant. No on-sale license shall be granted to any person who does not have invested or does not propose to invest in the fixtures and structure of the proposed on-sale establishment, exclusive of land, an amount of at least Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000). The Council may provide for an independent appraisal at applicant's expense as an aid in determining the value of said premises. In the event this requirement as to investment is not complied with within one year from the date of issuance of the license, the license may be revoked. (3/9/81, k94) 3-2-8: CONDITIONS OF LICENSE: Every license shall be granted subject to the conditions in the following subsection and all other provisions of this chapter and of any other applicable provisions of this code or state law. (A) Every licensee shall be responsible for the conduct of his place of business and the conditions of sobriety and order in it. (B) Any peace officer, health officer, or any properly designated officer or employee of the City shall have the unqualified right to enter, inspect, and search the premises of the licensee during business hours without a warrant. (C) Every licensee, except a private club licensee, shall not conduct business on the premises between the hours of one o'clock (1:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) a.m., Monday through Saturday inclusive, or on any Sunday between the hours of one o'clock (1:00) a.m. and twelve o'clock (12:00) noon, nor permit the presence of customers on the premises between the hours of one thirty o'clock (1:30) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) a.m., Monday through Saturday inclusive, or on any Sunday between the hours of one thirty o'clock (1:30) a.m. and twelve o'clock (12:00) noon; however, further provided that no intoxicating liquor may be sol +� or served on Sunday, whether directly or indirectly, except bstwssn' the hours of twelve o'clock (12:00) noon and one o'clock (1:00) a.m. Monday. and then only in conjunction with the serving of food to persons who are seated at tables within the licensed promises. noun.. (N275, 8/14/95) (D) All real estate taxes assessed against the licensed premises and all personal property taxes assessed against any personal property located in, on, or upon the licensed premises shall be paid or caused to be paid when due by the licensee, provided, however, that in the event the licensee and/or the owner of the licensed premises shall duly contest the validity and/or amount of any said real X76 MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III/Chet 2/Pogo 3 Council Agenda - 4/22/96 MEN •�.: 0 7 As you know, the Prairie West subdivision and planned unit development (PUD) was approved contingent on the vacation of Broadway Circle. It is necessary to vacate Broadway Circle because the PUD cannot meet setback requirements if Broadway Circle remains a public street. This action is also a condition of final plat approval. The Prairie West PUD homeowner association will be responsible for plowing snow and maintaining the roadway. The City will continue to be responsible for maintaining the sanitary sewer and water system up to the individual service lines. Easement rights to the utilities are described on the revised plat that will be recorded when the road is vacated. Motion to approve vacation of Broadway Circle contingent on the provision of water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer easements. Motion to deny vacation of Broadway Circle. C. STAFF RECOMMFNDATION: The Assistant Administrator recommends alternative #1. This is essentially a housekeeping matter that would have been placed on the consent agenda if there had not be a public hearing requirement. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None. Council Agenda - 4/22/96 Cona_ideration of adoption of development an d dlabu_rsement ngreem -nta - - iri Wont d v lopment. (J.0.)-- A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Council is asked to consider adopting the development and disbursement agreements governing the Prairie West subdivision and planned unit development. The agreement is very similar to the agreement governing the Klein Farms Estate and Battle Rapids development. Pointe worth noting regarding the agreement are as follows. The developer is paying for all installation of public utilities, which will be designed to integrate with a potential phase II development to the west. The cost of the utilities, including inspection, is estimated at $55,000. Installation will be inspected by the City's Construction Inspector and the cost of said inspection paid by the developer. Under the disbursement agreement, funds sufficient to cover the cost of the project are placed in escrow at Marquette Bank. The City controls the release of funds from the bank to the developer's contractor and will not release the funds until the work has been completed properly. R ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve development and disbursement agreements contingent on final review and approval by the City Attorney and subject to approval of plans and specifications by the City Engineer. The City Attorney is familiar with this agreement through review of the 10ein Farms Estate agreement. I do not expect that he will have objections to the agreement, but he may want to make a few adjustments. I will bring the agreement back to Council if he suggests any substantive changes. 2. Motion to deny approval of the development and disbursement agreements. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Assistant Administrator recommends alternative q1. 1] SUPPORTING )ATA: Copy of development agreement; Copy of disbursement agreement. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT PRAMM WEST THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 1996, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Minnesota (the "City"), and Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc., (the "Developer"). WHEREAS, City has granted final approval to a plat known as Prairie West Planned Unit Development (the "Subdivision"), said land legally described as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof ("Property") which Subdivision shall consist of twinhome residential units and Outlots A and B; and WHEREAS, Developer intends to construct, install, provide for and maintain streets, public storm sewer, and water, signs, pathway grading, and drainage improvement in accordance with the plans and specifications as hereinafter described, all at the sole cost and expense of Developer; and WHEREAS, the City has by resolution adopted April 8, 1996, granted final approval to the Subdivision and the improvements contemplated herein provided that the Developer enter into the within Agreement and that Developer faithfully perform the terms and conditions contained herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Pint Issues. The Developer agrees that the Subdivision shall be developed in accordance with the following exhibits attached hereto which aro hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. The exhibits are: Exhibit A -- Final Plat Exhibit B -- Protective Covenanta/Association Incorporation The above -referenced documents must be executed in accordance with City and County ordinances and filed in the office of the Wright County Recorder at Developer's expense no later than May 15, 1996. Prior to the commencement of construction, notwithstanding tho provisions of paragraph 19(b), Developer must pay to City all outstanding expenses incurred by City for platting and other dovelopmont purposes including, but not limited to, engineering, legal, and other professional staff fees. PRAIRIEWAOR: 4/19W Page 1 0 2. ReFresent-_tio a of Dev loperr. As inducement to the City's approval of the Subdivision and entering into this Agreement, the Developer hereby represents and warrants to the City: a. That the Developer is the fee owner of the Property and has authority to enter into this Agreement. b. That the intended use of the property is for a common interest community consisting of twinhome residential units. C. That the Subdivision complies with all city, county, state, and federal laws and regulations including, but not limited to, wetland regulation protection, City subdivision ordinances and zoning ordinances, to the best of Developer's knowledge. d. That to the best of Developer's knowledge, the Subdivision does not require an Environmental Assessment Worksheet or an Environmental Impact Statement, but shall prepare the same if required to do so by City or other governmental entity and shall reimburse City for all expenses incurred by City in Connection with the preparation of the review, including staff time and attorneys fees. 3. Developer Improvements. The Developer agrees it shall Construct, install, and maintain certain public and private improvements which shall include sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main improvements, roadway, grading, landscaping and drainage improvements ("Developer Improvements") on the Property, at Developer's sole mat and expense, in accordance with the following exhibits incorporated as if fully set forth herein: Exhibit C -- Crading(Development and Utility Plans Exhibit D -- landscaping and Buffer Yard Plan Developer agrees the Developer Improvements shall be performed in accordance with the plans, specifications, and preliminary engineering reports approved or to be approved by the City Engineer and the City prior to commencement of construction and thereafter, in accordance with all City rules, regulations, ordinances, and the requirements of this Agreement, which shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Street and pathway grading, graveling, surfacing and stabilizing which shall include curbs, gutter and driveway approaches. Street lighting within the Subdivision as determined to be necessary by the City. PRAIRIEW.AOR: 4/19M Page 2 q9 C. Storm sewers, including all necessary catch basins, and appurtenances. d. Water main, including all appurtenances. e. Sanitary sewer, including all appurtenances. f. Setting of lot and block monuments. g. Surveying and staking. h. Site grading, fencing and landscaping consistent with requirements set forth in Exhibit C. i. Establishment of at least two post office cluster box stands and boxes with groups of six or more. j. The City shall install street name signs, stop signs and other traffic control signs at all locations deemed necessary by City, at Developer's cost and expense. 4. Permits. Upon execution of this Agreement, Developer and other necessary parties shall promptly apply for all permits, approvals, licenses, or other documents from any and all necessary governmental agencies (which may include the City, Wright County, PCA and DNR) so as to enable Developer to construct the Developer Improvements as herein contemplated. Developer shall use its best efforts to obtain the same as soon as reasonably possible. No grading or building permit shall be issued by City unless the plans or application aro in conformity with the City comprehensive plan, this Agreement, and all local, state and federal regulations. The City shall, within fifteen ( 1b) days of receipt of plans, review such submittal to determine whether the foregoing requirements have been met. If the City discerns said plans or applications are deficient, it shall notify the Developer in writing stating Cho deficiencies and the steps necessary for correction. Issuance of a grading or building permit by City shall be a conclusive determination that the plans or applications have been approved as to the requested activity by Developer and satisfies the provisions of this section. The City may issue building permits prior to City acceptance of the Developer Improvements provided that the party applying for the building permit agrees to withhold requests for occupancy until necessary Developer Improvements have been installed, which include operational and tested sewer and water systems, installation of sod in the front yard, or appropriate escrow sum to insure compliance, at City's discretion, and roadway development sufficiently completed to support access by emergency vehicles, snowplows, and garbage trucks, to be Pasiaisw.er.,a; 4/19M Page 3 / v determined by the City Engineer in his sole discretion. Until such approval is granted, no dwelling may be occupied on either a temporary or permanent basis, except that model homes may be occupied by sales personnel for marketing and related purposes. Notwithstanding this provision, if the Developer is in default of this Agreement, as hereinafter defined, in addition to any other remedy provided by this Agreement, City may refuse to issue a certificate of occupancy for any lot or parcel in the Subdivision until Developer cures the default as provided herein. 5. Pre -Construction Activi i s. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting with City to review a proposed schedule for construction of the Developer Improvements. 6. Commencement of Consitruction of Developer Improvements. Upon obtaining all necessary governmental approvals, licenses and permits, subject to Unavoidable Delays, Developer shall commence construction of the Developer Improvements within ten (10) days. 7. Faithful P rfo ance of Construction of Improvements. Developer shall install, construct, and maintain the Developer Improvements in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Developer guarantees and warrants the workmanship and materials respecting such Developer Improvements for a period of one year following City's acceptance of the same ("Guarantee Period" ). The Developer shall repair or replace, as directed by the City and at the Developer's sole cost and expense, any work and/or materials that become defective, in the sole opinion of the City or its Engineer, within said Guarantee Period even though notice thereof be given by City after said Guarantee Period. The Developer, or Developer's contractors, shall post maintenance bonds or other security acceptable to City to secure these warranties. 9. Inspection of Improvements. Developer authorizes the City Inspector and City Engineer to inspect construction of the Developer Improvements on a full- time basis and grants to them a license to enter the Subdivision to perform all necessary duties and(or inspections deemed appropriate during the construction of the improvements until final certification of acceptance is approved by City and expiration of any applicable warranty period. Inspections by the City aro to be logged and reported hi -weekly to Developer. Construction and installation plans shall be provided to City and shall be reviewed by end subject to approval of the City. Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of qua] ity control to the extent that the Developer's engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets with the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. PRAIRIBW,AGR: 4/19M Pago 4 Developer shall cause its contractor to furnish City with a schedule of proposed operations at least five (5) days prior to the commencement of the construction of each Developer Improvement. The City shall inspect all such work items during and after construction for compliance with approved specifications and ordinance requirements. 9. Acceptance of Developer Improvements. Upon notification by Developer that any of the Developer Improvements have been completed, City Engineer shall inspect the Developer Improvement and, at his sole discretion, determine if the Development Improvement(s) has been completed in accordance with the plans, specifications and exhibits attached hereto. If the City Engineer determines that the Developer Improvement has been completed in accordance with all requirements, the City Engineer shall give the Developer written notice of acceptance within seven (7) days effective as of the date of the inspection. If the City Engineer determines that the Developer Improvements) is not completed in accordance with said requirements, the City Engineer shall notify Developer in writing of the deficiency and provide a reasonable date upon which to cure the deficiency. Failure by the Developer to cure within the stated time period shall constitute an Event of Default. 10. Cnmpletion of DevploRcr Improvempag. Developer agrees to complete the Developer Improvements on or before October 15, 1998. The Completion date as provided herein is subject to Unavoidable Delays as hereinafter defined, in which event the completion date may be extended by the period of such Unavoidable Delays. For the purpose of this section, Unavoidable Delays mean delays which are caused by strikes, fire, war, road weight restrictions, material shortages, weather that renders construction progress impossible, causes beyond the Developer's control or other casualty to the Developer Improvements, or the act of any federal, state, or local government unit, except those acts of the City authorized or contemplated by this Agreement. In the event Developer believes an extension is warranted, Developer shall request such extension in writing to the City Engineer and specify the requested length of extension and the mason therefore. The City Engineer shall determine the length of the extension, if any, in his solo discretion. 11. Ownersh ^of Improv—nn . Upon the completion of the Developer Improvements required to be constructed by this Agreement, and the acceptance thereof by the City, the Developer Improvements lying within the public easements as shown on the Subdivision plat shall become City property without further notice or action. Within thirty days thereafter, and before any security as herein required PRAIRIEW.AGR: 4/I9MG Page 5 qG is released, Developer shall supply City with a complete set of reproducible "AS BUILT" and "DEVELOPMENT PLAN" plans in a form acceptable to the City Engineer, without charge to City, which documents shall become the property of City. 12. Clean U . The Developer shall properly clear any soil, earth, or debris on City -owned property or public right-of-way resulting from construction work by the Developer, its agents, or assigns. 13. Erosion anti Drainnge Control. The Developer shall provide and com=ply with erosion and drainage control plan requirements as described in Extxibit C and as otherwise required by City. As development progresses, the City may impose additional erosion and drainage control requirements if, in the sole opinion of the City Engineer, they would be useful and appropriate in controlling drainage and erosion. Developer shall promptly comply with such erosion and drainage control plans and with such additional instructions it receives from City. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. 14. Hold Harmlrga Agrmmmit. For the purposes of this paragraph 16, "Developer" includes the Prairie West Association to be formed pursuant to Exi-iibit B. Developer acknowledges that failure to control erosion in accordance with the plans and exhibits as contained herein may cause flooding and/or damage to adjoining property owners. In such event, Developer agrees to hold City harmless and indemnify City from claims of all third parties or by Developer for damages arising out of such flooding and/or damages. The parties recognize that in emergency situations, time is of the essence in preventing damage to persons and to property. In the event of an emergency situation requiring immediate action to prevent loss or damage to persons or property, to be determined at the sole discretion of City, the notice and cure provisions of paragraph 20 shall not apply and City is authorized to undertake any corrective action it deems necessary to prevent or minimize any such flooding and/or damage, In such event, Developer agrees to hold City harmless and indemnify City from claims of all third parties, or by Developer, for damages arising out of said corrective action by City, and agrees to reimburse City for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by City arising out of the corrective action, whether performed within or without designated easement areas, including but not limited to any costs necessary to re -landscape disrupted soils located within the Subdivision. PRAIRIEW.AORi 4110M Page 6 9 15. ina�sa�eo, The Developer will provide and maintain or cause to be maintained at all times during the process of constructing the Developer Improvements until six (6) months atter acceptance of all Developer Improvements and, from time to time at the request of the City furnish with proof of payment of premiums on: Comprehensive general liability insurance (including operations, contingent liability, operations of subcontractors, completed operations and contractual liability insurance) together with an Owner's Contractor's Policy with limits against bodily injury, including death, and property damage (to include, but not be limited to damages caused by erosion or flooding) which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of any of its subcontractors. Limits for bodily injury or death shall not be less than $500,000.00 for one person and $1,000,000.00 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall not be less than $200,000.00 for each occurrence. The City, City Engineer and Developer's Engineer shall be an additional named insured on said policy. Developer shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City upon request. Worker's compensation insurance, with statutory coverage. 16. Secuirity for Cost of Improvements. For the purpose of financing the construction, installation and maintenance of the Developer Improvements, Developer has executed and delivered to Marquette Bank ("Lender") a Note and Mortgage encumbering the property in an amount not less than $18,000. The proceeds of this loan shall be escrowed by Lender and disbursed only in accordance with the terms and conditions of a certain Disbursement Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit _ and incorporated by reference herein. No work shall be commenced under this Agreement until the Note, Mortgage, and Disbursement Agreement has been executed and conformed copies filed with City. 17. Respawtilillity for Castn. The Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or City in connection with the development of the Subdivision, including but, not limited to construction of Developer Improvements, PRAIRIEW.AOR: Vle/ee Page 7 02 legal, planning, engineering, and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the Subdivision plat, the preparation of this Agreement, and all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the Subdivision, including reasonable attorneys fees in the event City undertakes enforcement of this Agreement by City. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work until the bills are paid in full. 18. Pro ihitio a Agina . aaienment of Agreement. Developer represents and agrees that (except for associating with other individuals or entities), prior to the completion of the Developer Improvements as certified by the City: Except only by way of security for, and only for the purpose of obtaining financing necessary to enable the Developer or any successor in interest to the Property, or any part thereof, to perform its obligations with respect to the construction of the Developer Improvements under this Agreement, and any other purpose authorized by this Agreement, the Developer (except as so authorized) will not make or create, or suffer to be made or created, any total or partial sale, assignment, conveyance, or transfer in any other mode or form of with respect to this Agreement or any interest therein, or any contract or agreement to do any of the same, without the prior written approval of City. In the absence of specific written agreement by the City to the contrary, no such transfer or approval by City shall be deemed to relieve Developer from any of its obligations. In the event that City approves a substitute developer and the Property is transferred to said substitute, the City agrees to relieve the Developer of liability from performance as described in this contract. Said substitute shall assume all responsibilities and rights of the Developer under this contrnct. 19. Rv ntq of D f ult. n fined- The following shall be "Events of Default" under this Agreement and the term "events of dofault" shall mean, whenever it is used in this Agreement (unless the context otherwise provides), any one or more of the following events: PRAtalew.AGH: utaos Pago 8 V a. Failure by the Developer to observe and substantially perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed hereunder, after written notice to the Developer as provided in this Agreement. b. If the Developer shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, or shall file a petition in bankruptcy, or shall make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or shall consent to the appointment of a receiver of itself or of the whole or any substantial part of the property. C. If the Developer shall file a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws. d. If the Developer is in default under the Mortgage and has not entered into a work-out agreement with the Lender. e. The Developer shall, after commencement of the construction of the Developer Improvements, default in or violate its obligations with respect to the construction of the same (including the nature and the date for the completion thereof), or shall abandon or substantially suspend construction work, and such act or actions is not due to Unavoidable Delays and any such default, violation, abandonment, or suspension shall not be cured, ended, or remedied within the time provided for in this Agreement. 20. Notice/RemedipFinnnefallit. Whenever any Event of Default occurs, the City shall give written notice of the Event of Default to Developer by United States mail at its last known address. If the Developer fails to cure the Event of Default within fifteen (15) days of the date of mailed notice, in addition to any other remedy provided in this Agreement, and without waiver of any such right, City may avail itself of any or all of the following remedies: a. Halt all plat development work and construction of Developer Improvements. b. Refuse to issue building permits or occupancy permits as to any parcel until such time as the Event of Default is cured. C. Apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin continuation of the Event of Default. d. Exercise any and all remedies available to City pursuant to the Disbursement Agreement.. If the Event of Default is the failure of Developer to complete, construct, install or correct the Developer Improvements in accordance with the plans and PRAIRIEW.AOR: 4/19M Pago9 0/y specifications and this Agreement, City may perform the construction or work and apply to Lender pursuant to the Disbursement Agreement to reimburse City for its expenses. This provision shall be a license granted by the Developer to the City to act, but shall not require the City to take any such action. Developer consents to such action by City and waives any claim Developer may have against City for damages in the event City exercises its rights in accordance with this provision. Terminate this Agreement by written notice to Developer at which time all terms and conditions as contained herein shall be of no further force and effect and all obligations of the parties as imposed hereunder shall be null and void. 21. Miscellanpnug. a. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors or assigns, as the case may be. b. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of his Agreement. C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties, and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. d. Future residents of this Subdivision shall not be deemed to be third party beneficiaries of this Agreement. e. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the Developer, its successors and assigns. The Developer shall, at its expense record this Agreement in the Office of the Wright County Recorder. After Cho Developer has completed the work required under this Agreement, at the Developer's request the City will execute and deliver to Developer a release in recordable form. f All parties to this Agreement acknowledge they have been represented by counsel and have entered into this Agreement freely and voluntarily. PawislEWAaa: mane Page 10 9 r 22. Wig. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, or mailed to the Developer by United States mail, postage prepaid to the following address: 12420 Armitage Avenue NW, Monticello, MN 55362, or such other address as may be designated in writing from time to time. Notices to City shall be in writing and either hand delivered to the City Administrator or mailed to City by United States mail, postage prepaid to the address: City of Monticello, 250 East Broadway, Monticello, Minnesota 55362 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have signed this Developer's Agreement the day and year first written above. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brad Fyle Mayor Rick Wolfsteller City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 1996, by Mayor Brad Fylo and by City Administrator Rick Wolfateller of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public PRAIRIEW.AGH: 4/19M Page 11 9K CEDRUS CREEK CRAFTSMAN, INC. John Komarek STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 1996, by John Komarek, the of Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc., a corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public This Instrument Drafted By: City of Monticello 260 East Broadway PO Box 1147 Monticello, MN 66362 PPAMIBW.ACR: 4119M Pago 12 4L ITA Final Plat On file at the offices of Monticello City Hall PRAIRIEW.AaR: 4/19M Page 13 9Af EXHIBIT B Protective Covenants/Association Ineorporation On file at the office of the Wright County Recorder PRAIRIEW.AGR: VISM Page 14 A N g AnYnaa C Grading/Development and Utility Plane On file at the offices of Monticello City Hall PRAIRIEW.AaR: 411OW Pap 15 90 DISBURSEMENT AGREEMENT PRAIRIE WEST THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered on 1996, by and between John Komarek of Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc. (Developer), Marquette Bank ( Lender), and the City of Monticello, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation (City). WHEREAS, the Developer is the owner of the rear property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, commonly known as Prairie West (Subdivision); WHEREAS, on April 22, 1996, the Developer and the City made and entered into a Development Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B (Development Agreement), concerning the construction of certain improvements to the Subdivision as described therein (Developer Improvements); WHEREAS, on . 1996, the Developer and the Lender made and entered into a Loan Agreement (Loan Agreement), wherein the Lender agreed to loan the Sum of $18,000 to the Developer for the purpose of construction of the Developer Improvements and other related development costs; WHEREAS, on , 1996, the Developer, as maker, executed and derived to the Lender, as payee, a promissory note in the sum of $18,000, with interest thereon payable on or before , 19_, and said note was secured by a Mortgage executed and delivered by Developer, as mortgagor, to Lender, as mortgagee, encumbering the Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to establish procedures concerning the disbursement of funds under the Loan Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: Security , The City hereby accepts this Disbursement Agreement as Security for the construction of the Developer Improvements under the Development Agreement. The liability of the Lender to the City under this Disbursement Agreement shall automatically be reduced to the extent of advances made by the Lender under the loan Agreement for the Developer Improvements, provided that said advances are approved in writing by the City. In the event of improper disbursement, Lender shall be liable to City for any damages arising from any improper disbursement up to the amount of such improper disbursement. 1'aAINIF,W.04M 411W9e Page 1 919 2. Certification bye 'neer. Midwest Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc., (Private Engineer) and/or City Engineer shall certify in writing to the Developer, the Lender, and City the progress of construction of the Developer Improvements at the conclusion of each stage of construction. Such certification shall set forth the quality of workmanship, the stage of construction according to the plans and specifications, the dollar amount of the Developer Improvements completed to the date of such certification, and the dollar amount of the disbursement necessary to pay for the certified Developer Improvements. 3. Approval by City. After receipt of the certification by the Private Engineer, the City shall give written notice to the Developer and the Lender whether the City approves or rejects the Developer Improvement relating to such certification. The City will use its best efforts to notify the Developer and Lender within ten (10) business days after receipt of such certification by the Private Engineer. The City may perform its own independent inspection of the Developer Improvements. Diwbn-roements and Re innge- If the City approves a certification of the Developer Improvement by the Private Engineer in writing, the Lender may rely upon such approval and, if so instructed by the City, advance no more than ninety-five percent (95%) of the sum certified by the Private Engineer for the Developer Improvements. Five percent (5%) of all certified sums of the Developer Improvements (Retainage) may be retained until the final inspection by the City. The Retainage shall be disbursed ninety-one (91) days after the City completes its final inspection and establishes a Completion Date. If the City rejects any item of the Developer Improvements in the certification by the Private Engineer, the Lender shall not advance any funds relating to that item of the Developer Improvements until the City has given its written consent. Certification not relating to Developer Improvements as referenced in the Development Agreement shall not require the fi% retainage pursuant to this paragraph. Suspension or Termination to Certification by Private En nee The City may suspend or terminate the certification of the Developer Improvements by the Private Engineer. In such event, the City shall give written notice to the Developer and the Lender of such suspension or termination. Such suspension or termination shall not affect any certification issued by the Private Engineer prior to the receipt of such notice to all parties. Such suspension or termination shall be prospective only. In the event of such suspension or termination, the City shall inspect the Developer Improvements completed, certify to the Developer and the Lender the dollar amount of the Developer Improvements completed to Cho date of such certification, and the amount to be advanced to pay for the certified Developer Improvements. PiuiivaWIN11. uiwm Paget 74L Fi ll InRp=dnn by tho City. Pursuant to the Development Agreement, the City Engineer of the City shall make a final inspection of the Developer Improvements. The Private Engineer shall have no authority to make the final inspection on behalf of the City. The City Engineer may object to any construction defects discovered during the final inspection regardless of when such defects occurred. The failure of the City to object to a prior certification by the Private Engineer shall not be deemed a waiver of the City's right to demand the correction of any construction defects discovered during the final inspection. Default by Developer. Right to Cure. If the Developer commits an event of default upon its obligations as imposed by this Agreement, or pursuant to the Note and Mortgage executed by Developer, or as defined within the Development Agreement with City and does not cure the event of default within the time proscribed within the Development Agreement, the City may give the Developer notice of the City s intention to terminate the private installation of the Developer Improvements, and the City may proceed to let contracts to complete the Developer Improvements. The cost of said contracts, plus other obligations of the Developer under the Development Agreement, may be drawn from the remaining unadvanced amount of Lender under this Disbursement Agreement. In the alternative, upon default by the Developer of its obligations under the Development Agreement following the above-described notice, the City may request the Lender to advance the remaining unadvanced funds under this Disbursement Agreement directly to the City, which funds the City shall send in escrow for the exclusive purpose of completing the Developer Improvements and satisfying the other obligations of the Developer under the Development Agreement. Upon final completion of the Developer Improvements, the City shall pay any remaining funds to Lender to be applied as a payment on Developer's behalf. The notice of uncured default shall be signed by the Mayor or the Clerk of the City. Copies of the said notices shall also be served on the Lender. In the event the City does not recoup its cost in completing the Developer Improvements under the provisions of this paragraph, as an additional remedy, the City may, at its option, assess the benefited property in the manner provided by minnrge n $ nlLing Section 429.01 et seq. This Agreement shall expire on 1996. This Agreement shall automatically be extended for successive RIX - month periods unless Lender gives written notice to the City 30 days prior to any expiration date. If the Lender chooses not to extend the Agreement and the City desires continued financial security for the Developer's obligations under the Development Agreement, the City may request the Lender disburse to the City the remaining unadvanced amount of this Disbursing Agreement, which funds the City shall hold in escrow for the exclusive purpose of completing the Developer Improvements or other obligations of the Developer under the Development Agreement. Upon final completion of PRAIHIEw.1114U: WSW Pace 3 9K the Developer Improvements and satisfaction of the Developer's obligations under the Development Agreement, the City shall pay any remaining funds to Lender to be applied as a payment on Developer's behalf. 9. Any request by the City or the Lender which is authorized by paragraphs 7 and 8 shall be honored by the Lender within three (3) business days after demand is made by the City. 10. Any notice provided for in this Agreement may be delivered or mailed as follows: Lender. Marquette Bank 106 Pine Street. PO Bo: 729 Monticello, MN 55362 Developer. Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc. 12420 Armitage Avenue NW Monticello, MN 55362 City: 250 East Broadway PO Bos 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 Attn: Rick Wolfsteller Such notices shall be deemed to have been given when received by all parties. 11. GoverninQ Law. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the law of the State of Minnesota. 12. Assig mmiL The rights of the City under this Agreement cannot be assigned. 13. Rinding BindingRffect This Agreement shall inure to and bind the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 14. Nn Third Party Rlghta. This Agreement is made for the sole benefit of the parties hereto. No other person shall have any rights or remedies under this Agreement. PRAIRIEW.nse: OPM Pap, 9s IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have made and entered into this Agreement as of the first day and year above written. CITY OF MONTICELLO By: Brad Fyle Its Mayor By: Rick Wolfsteller Its City Administrator CEDRUS CREEK CRAF'T'SMAN, INC. By: John Komarek Its MARQUETTE BANK By: PRAIRI INI:4/IWN Pages 9 10*0 Council Agenda - 4/22t96 ,1 1 1T.T.,3 &I A r.r. n 977T-771:1:1 •,•A _) 1 :111: 1 1 IIL,: yell: • u :1: • Attached you will find a complete report submitted by Northwest Associated Consultants regarding the request above. Please review the report for background information and alternative actions. RPR -19-1996 1128 NRC 612 595 9857 P.02 , rN Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. C C O MINI U NIT T P L ANNING - DES ION - NA A K 9T ARSILA AC N PLANNING REPORT TO: Monticello Mayor and City Council Monticello Planning Commission FROM: Bob Krmis/Stephen Grittman DATE: 19 April 1996 RE: Monticello - Car Star CUP and Varier= FILE NO: 191.07 -96.02 BACKGROUND Mr. Mike Zieske on behalf of Car Star Inc. Is requesting approval of a eonditlonal use permit to allow the establishment of on auto body repair chop upon a 40,000 square foot parcel of land located south of Interstate 94 and wast of Sandberg Road. The sub)ect property is zoned B-3, Highway Business which lists auto body attop repair facilities as conditional uses. In addition to the requested conditional use permit, the applicant has also requested a variance from the C /s surfwng reWireffAnts for vehicle storage areas associated with the proposed use. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit 8 - Site Survey Exhibit C - Slte/Urdseaps Pian Exhibit D - Building Elevations Exhibit E - Floor Plan 5775 Wayzata Blvd. - Suite 555 - St. Louis Park, MN 55416.(612) 595 -9636 -Fax. 595-9837 PPR -19-1996 1128 NRC 612 $95 9657 P.03 ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Zordng. The subject property is zoned B3, Highway Business. The purpose of the B-9 District Is to provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. As noted previously, auto body shop repair facilities are listed as conditional uses in such district. Conditional Use PermlL The purpose of the required conditional use permit process is to enable the City Council to assign dimensions to a proposed use or conditions surrounding It after consideration of a*acent uses and their functions and the special problems which the proposed use presents to provide the City of Monticello with a reasonable degree of discretion in determining the suitability of certain designated uses upon the general welfare, public health and safety. Procedurally, the Planning Commission and City Council shall consider the possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use. Its judgement shall be based upon but not limited to the following factors: 1. Relationship to municipal Comprehensive Plan. 2. The geographical area involved. 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depredate the area in which it is proposed. 4. The character of the surrounding area S. The demonshatod need for such use. Neighborhood Character. As noted previously, the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the character of the area in which the use has boon proposed. The following is a listing of uses which lie adjacent to the property in question: Direction Use North Commercial Child Care South Office East Car Dealership West Agriculture Provided ample screening Is provided upon the subject site (partiadarly along ft northem boundary), it is believed the proposed use can compatibly exist upon the subject site. WR -19-19% 11:29 WC 612 595 9857 P.04 Lot Area, Width and Building Height Requirements. As shown below, the proposed ak.-tobody repair facility meets applicable lot area, width and building height requirements imposed in the B-3 District: Requirement EM22MA Lot Area None 40,000 SF Lot Width 100 Feet 201 Feet Building Height 2 Stories 1 Story Setbacks. As shown below, the proposed auto body repair shop has been found to comply with applicable B-3 District setback requirements. Front Yard Spired 30 Feet Proposed 45 Feet Side Yard 10 Feet 20 Feet Rear Yard 30 Feet 53 Feet ONStreet Parlting: Parldng Supply. As calculated below, the proposed autobody repair facility Is required to provide 16 oR-street parking stalls. 0 Use (Floor Areal Ratio SpMs Ragyjred Auto Repair 8 spaces plus 1 space 16 (7,140 SF) for each 800 SF over 1,000 SF of floor area The submitted site plan illustrates a total of 14 off-street parking stalls with a potential for nine additional stalls. As a condition of conditional use permit approval, the site plan should be revised to provide a total of 16 off-stroot parking spaces. Mine. oral Roqukements. While ample area wdsts to satisfy parking stall dimensional requirements, proposed stall Ienip3 (striping) should be Increased in depth from 17 to 20 feet (such modification will reduce the proposed drhro aisle width from 35 to 33 foot). Mmdleap Stalls, In . „.. 1..... with slots American Disability Act requirements. one off- s-tmot handicap parking stall has been provided upon the site. Carbing. In accordanw wUh Zoning Ordirnrncs requirements, all off-street parkft auras are to be provided a six inch non-surmountabto concrete curb. - 3 _.. /0 C.4 PPR -19-19% 1129 NRC 612 595 9837 P.05 Surfacing. The ordinance states that off-street parking areas for commercial uses such as that proposed must be surfaced in bituminous material. While the site's off-street parking areas are noted as being surfaced with bituminous material, the site's vehicle storage area is shown to be surfaced in gravel. To allow such surfacing material, the processing of a variance will be necessary. This issue will be addressed in a latter section of this report. Curb Cut According to the submitted site plan, a 30 foot wide curb cut to Sandberg Road has been proposed. Per Ordinance requirements, such curb cut width shall require approval of the City Engineer and Zoning Administrator. Loading. The Zoning Ordinance does not provide a specfic off-street loading requirement for uses such as that being proposed. As a condition of CUP approval, however, a specific off-street loading space should be designated upon the submitted site plan. Noise. To ensure compabbility with surrounding uses, measures should be taken to avoid noise from body shop activities. Specifically, construction measures (i.e., building insulation) should be demanatrated by the applicant and utilized to absorb noise emanating from the property. Screening and Ling. Sceaning is required to buffer all outdoor vehicle storage areas to ensure aesthetic compatibility with the area per the Ordinance. Such screening must consist of a six foot high, 100 percent opaque fence designed to blend with the auto body shop structure and consisting of materials treated to resist discoloration. In consideration of the less intense uses which surround the subject property, It Is recd n Tended that high quality fence materials (i.e., wood) be used to screen the outdoor storage area. In accordance with CUP submission requirements, a landscape plan has been submitted for review (see Exhibit C) According to the plan, a mixture of Redmond Lindens, Norway Maples and Black Hills Spruce have been proposed along the subject property's northern and southern boundaries. While such Iandscaping efforts are considered well conceived, it is recommended that an Intensification of landscaping be provided along property boundaries. Particularly, the addloon of some coniferous plantings along the site's northern boundary is recommended to provide a year round screen from the adjacent day care facility. Ughting. It has not been indicated whether any wderior lighting is to be provided on site. Any lighting usod to illuminate oft-stroet parking or outdoor storage areas must be hooded and directed to dofloct light away from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. /Q \ APR -19-1996 1129 NRC 612 595 9637 P.26 Development Quality/Building Materials. While City ordinances make an allowance for pole type commercial buildings, such allowance may be considered contrary to various policies provided in the City's pending Comprehensive Plan. This relates to a specific policy of broadening the Ciys tax base through the promotion of high quality development Following adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, reconsideration of the City's building material requirements may be appropriate. According to the Zoning Ordinance, buildings in all districts must be finished on all sides with consistent architectural quality, materials, and design. B-3 District provisions specifically state that secondary or non -advertising walls which face a public right -0f -way must use a combination of colors or materials which serve to break up the monotony of a single color flat surface and that the advertising wall facing the right-cf-way, must consist of no more than 50 percent metal material. As shown on the submitted building elevation% the proposed body shop Is to be finished in 29 gauge steel with the front facade being accented with acrylic panels and a brick base. Resultantly, the maximum 50 percent metal material requirement has been satisfactorily met. One final concern over the building as proposed relates to the color scheme. The developer has proposed very bright colors for both front building panels and the roof. It is suggested that the developer consider an alternative color scheme which would be more compatible with the surrounding neighborhood commercial uses. Signage. Within B-9 Zoning Districts, a maximum of one well sign and one freestanding sign are permitted with a maximum of 100 square foot allowed for all signs. While a ± 50 square foot wall sign has boon illustrated on the submitted east building elevation, it has not been indicated whether a freestanding sign Is proposed. As a condition of CUP approval, all applicable City sign requirements must be satisfied. Grading and Drainage. As a condition of CUP approval, a grading and drainage plan must be submitted. Such plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Of particular lesuo is the need to vacate existing drainage and utility easements which currently bisect the subject property (see Exhibit 8). Variance. B-3 District provisions state that the floor of vehicle storage areas for auto body repair shops must consist of asphalt or concrete paving. As noted on tho submitted site plan, the applicant has proposed a 'clean gravel' surfacing of such vehicle storage area. To accommodate the applicant's proposal, approval of a variance is necessary. In consideration of variance requests, the Planning Commission must make a finding that the proposed action will not Impair an adoquato supply of light and air to adjacont property. Unroasonably increaso tho congostlon In tho public stroot. /® c GWR -19-1996 11:32 NAC 612 595 9837 P.07 3. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety 4. Unreasonably diminish or Impair established property values within the neighborhood or in any other way be contrary to the intent of this ordinance. Additionally, the Planning Commission must determine that a non-ecoriomic hardship exists to warrant approval of the variance. In consideration of this matter, It is the opinion of our office that no hardship has been demonstrated related to the physical conditions of the site which would warrant approval of the requested variance. CITY ACTION The applicant has requested a conditional use permit to allow the establishment of an auto body repair shop within a 641, Highway Suslrxw Zoning District Additionally, a variance has been requested from the surfachtg requirements for vehicle storage areas associated with auto body repair shops. Doehion One - Conditional Use Pam* for an Auto Body Repair Shop Alternative A - Conditional Use Permit Approval (Nth Conditions). This alternative would allow the establishment of the proposed use, provided several conditions aro imposed to ensure use corrpabbtility, end proper functlorting. The fact that auto body repair shops are listed as conditional uses In the 8-3 District establishes that the imposition of various conditions is necessary to ensure use compatibility. It is the recommendation of staff that the requested conditional use permit be approved based upon the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the spirit and Intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan goals and policies and in keeping with the Intent of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed project is consistent with the purpose of the performance standards of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed project will not have any adverse impacts, as outlined in the conditional use pormit section of the Zoning Ordinance. /a RPR -19-1996 1130 NRC 612 595 9857 P.08 4. The proposed project shall meet minimum suing and landscaping requirements as outlined herein. 5. The proposed project shall provide adequate parking and loading as outlined herein. 6. The proposed project shall not impose any undue burden upon public facilities and services. 7. The proposed project is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified envMwieru writtin its boundaries which will not be detrimental to future land uses in surrounding areas. Architecture and site treatments shall be compatible with adjacent structures and site pians and shall respect the privacy of neighboring businesses. Conditions: 1. Two additional oft -street parking stalls are provided to comply with applicable off- street parking supply requirements (16 total spaces required). 2. Parking lot stalls are increased in depth from 17 to 20 feet. 3. All City sign requirements are determined to be satisfied. 4. A grading and drainage plan is subrtitted and subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. All exterior lighting is hooded and directed to deflect light away from adjacent properties and public rigtttsof-way. 6. The proposed 30 foot wide curb cut is subject to approval by the City Engineer. 7. The applicant demonstrate that no adverse noise Impacts wili be imposed upon surrounding proper (i.e., through building Insulation, ata). S. Additional landscaping Is provided along property boundaries. Specifically, coniferous plantings be provided along the northern property lines to provide an effective year round screen. 9. High quality fencing (i.e., wood) Is used to woo, the site's outdoor storage area. 7 /oG PPR -19-1996 1130 NRC 612 595 963] P.09 AlLemative B -Conditional Use Permit Dartia6 A second alDernative available to the City would be to deny the requested conditional use permit If the City chooses to deny the conditional use permit request, it should be based upon the following findings, The proposed use is not consistent with the spirit and intern of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed use shall have an adverse impact upon surrounding properties. Decision Two - Variance ft m SuiflOeing Requlrsnrents Altemative A - Approve Variance Request. Should the City wish to approve such variance request, such approval should be based upon a finding that genuine hardship has in fact been demonstrated Considering that the applicant has not demonstrated genuine, non -economic hardship unique to the subject property, it is the opinion of our office that the proper justification does not exist to warrant approval of the requested variance f m City surfacing requirements. Alternative B - Deny Variance. A second option available to the Citic would be to deny the requeated variance. Should the City choose to deny the variance request h should be based on a finding that a..—. o ...,w.,ic hardship hes not been derr=uVated by the applicant. It is the opinion of our office that the applicant has not satisfied the Citye variance criteria. In this regard, we recorn mend that much request be denied. Should the City deny the request, compliance with surfacing requirements should be imposed as a condition of CUP. pc Jeff O'Neill /O RPR-19-1996 1130 NRC 612 S95 9837 P.10 lW Lau,"• Z f , — SITE �� , ; , ; , t "L, 6 9 1 •++` 1.90.' TPo I \ 4 l • t '�_{�o�~, S , �,' • •PARK �r mac•• .�..r ..— i1gY/J PAM • d . d I%4.46 illoujSECo .• •. 1 • i � • 4 rhlr• ' ...... ' ..r . i �xMT A • SM l,• / O �wary and • �� • Liowapa�_Easmnrr a �. -! ' . .• � � r r'�"rr' mow✓ r4n � , .t •,,': � � / ram / r i !� �•. � % , Vamw � l 0aP� Fosersrn/ 1 1 \ , r SanbergRoad -�_ - -- n 11 - p ( SANDBERG ROAD - rj 0 O yiS7 Z1S'lfTL7' I'lArtr FRONT ELEVATION 'rM,WDW R7G�� jtpvATiON V L4 f ,pr v _ ,-LP" —i Y . 1'-1 _ —'_fi — t- � -� 7 / !' 1' 1'.P_ .1' 0' ,' 0' I' 0' " 4, 1 i'_4' , • I nx�' err 1 ' ;_,v' • �,ru ' n 0,W stevw ,rLre I ` I_ w of ON,CODs , cx OWN �— ! -, ______ 7tra _____ 1 01 CON?. fOL1 VLM! JI Y—,ureo v.• , , cnw: Q I tl NA �, 1 o. e 1 ' 4 lll1^1lll,��/ I ,J�• .1`2 �, J'�J:B-'. 1'�Q' - 1' O'_r_�::Q�,_I':B• _ .1'.Q' �_I'3:�:Q: ,M_I���!'�Q'..,�.1_Q:.,1, 1':Q' � i' Q . Y� FLOOR PLAN l • WA; a 1,'11 r 0' n Council Agenda - 4/22/96 ream (R.W.) The City of Monticello owns the north half of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 60 (the former Hass property), located north of Fred's Auto Repair and directly west of the existing Post Office. The property borders on Linn Street. The purpose of this agenda item is to find out whether the City of Monticello has an interest in possibly selling this lot to the owner of the Post Office facility to be used as an additional access point to their property. While the request may sound simple, I will attempt to provide some background information as to why this request is being made by the landlord of the Post Office, Mr. Charles Ehlen of Cinco Corporation. As you may recall, until recently the Post Office has had a second access off of Locust Street to the Post Office property through the parking lot of the Metcalf and Larson properties. Last fall, Metcalf and Larson blocked off the access when their request for assistance from the Post Office or the landlord for help in defraying the cost of maintaining the alley easement was denied. At the time Metcalf and Larson had requested some assistance in maintenance cost, it was brought to the City's attention that a 20 -ft easement was never recorded against the property as originally planned, which the attorneys felt allowed them to block off the access at their discretion. What becomes ironic is that the 20 -ft easement through the Metcalf and Larson property was to be supplied by them in exchange for the City releasing a 12 -ft easement that crosses their property directly behind their existing buildings. The fact that Metcalf and Larson failed to live up to their own agreement is now causing the City to become involved in this dispute. As additional background, before the Post Office was originally built, a 12.11 easement crossing the former Larry Flake vacant property abutting Locust Street was provided to the City so that the Post Office site would have two accesses, one off Locust Stmot and one off Broadway. This 124 easement access was used for a number of years until Metcalf and Larson proposed a plan to build an office building on the comer of Locust and Broadway. As part of their development plan, additional parking was necessary, and the HRA became involved in acquiring and demolishing a home at the north end of Dots R, 9, and 10, go that. Metcalf and l.nmon could hnild a larger Miilding on their property. In order to do so, the City had intended to vacate the 124 easement that was originally used as access to the Post Office and relocate it farther north in the middle of what would become Metcalf and Larson's parking lot. The HRA spent approximately $32,000 to acquire and demolish Cho property and resold it to Metcalf and Larson for $10,000 as part of a TIF district. Metcalf and Larson were to provide the City with a now 204 Council Agenda - 4/22/96 dedicated recorded easement so that the Post Office would continue to have two access points. As I noted earlier, because the developer failed to provide a recordable easement, they are now blocking access to the Post Office site. I believe originally Metcalf and Larson had hoped to receive some sort of assistance from the Post Office or the Post Office building owner to help them defray the cost of snow removal, sealcoating, and other maintenance in the parking lot. The Post Office has indicated they did not feel it was their responsibility to pay for any additional cost, as they were leasing the property, and the building owner, likewise, did not feel it was their responsibility to help pay for maintenance of an easement that was supposed to be provided originally. The HRA has discussed this topic on a couple of occasions and has yet to take any enforcement action against Metcalf and Larson to provide the easement as originally proposed in a development agreement. Instead, it has been suggested by Mr. Brad Larson and also supported by the HRA that possibly the City of Monticello should sell, donate, or whatever, our property on the west side of the Post Office so that a second access could be provided to the west rather than through Metcalf and Larson's property. While I agree that this could be a possible solution to the problem by not only providing additional access but possibly additionally parking for the Post Office, the Council needs to decide whether this is the intended use of this property and, if so, the value you would like to receive for this property. The Ci ty of Monticello acquired the former Hass property a number of years ago for approximately $45,000 plus demolition. While the property may not he worth this as vacant property, if the Council is interested in offering the property for sale to the Cince Corporation, the owner of the Post Office facility, we should probably obtain an appraisal to establish a fair price. Recently, the Postmaster has indicated that the Postal Service is looking at building a second facility near Burger King soon but will keep the present location open for customer service. It's very possible that if this location becomes a problem for them traffic -wise in the future, they may consider relocating the entire Post Office facility to their property near Burger King some day. In a related matter, it may be interesting to see what the downtown revitalization study indicates will happen in the downtown area, which might also include a possible site for a new Post Office in the future. While I don't know if there are nny plana for r0nealing in the downinwn area, it might be something that the committee will be looking at. In order to keep their options open, Mr. Charles Ehlen of Cinco Corporation did inquire as to whether the City of Monticello would be interested in selling its property and for what price. 1 believe the landlord wants to keep the Post Office as its tenant, although they did feel they had good traffic circulation in Council Agenda - 4/22196 the past with the access where it was originally established. The Council will have to decide whether you are interested in trying to find a solution to a traffic problem by using our own property or whether we should simply insist that the HRA re-establish the original 20 -ft easement through the Metcalf and Larson parcels. If the Council is interested in selling the City parcel to the Cinco Corporation, an appraisal should be obtained to establish the price. 2. Council could request that the HRA first attempt to enforce the provisions of their own development agreement and re-establish the r original 20 -ft easement from Locust Street. The City could decide to not sell its property at this time nor to request that the HRA obtain the original easement and let the Post Office, its landlord, and Metcalf and Larson deal with the issues. C. STAFF F..O MF.NDATION: When the City originally acquired the Hass property, it was for the intent of removing a blighted structure and for future redevelopment of the area. I have always assumed that this property would eventually be either used when the comer auto repair facility was redeveloped or possibly in conjunction with an expansion of the Post Office facility. While the sale of the property to the Post Office landlord may be a good solution for utilizing this property, I've also questioned why the HRA is not willing to enforce their own agreement and require Metcalf and Larson to provide and re-establish the alley easement off of Locust Street. According to our records, the City of Monticello has never vacated or sold the original 12 -ft strip of property located directly behind Metcalf and Larson's back door. Although this property falls a few feet short of providing access to the Post Office property, possibly the City could look at turning over this strip of land to the Post Office property owner to be used as a negotiating item to re-establish the original 2041 easement. Regardless of the Council's decision, if there's an interest in selling the City property, I would suggest the property be offered for fair market value and an appraisal obtained before making any offer to RPI1. Sketch of Block 60; Various correspondence between Metcalf and Larson, Post Office; H RA minutes and agendas relating to this topic in the past. CHY pamw PIDP 155-010- e— .1 -ES SS-010-e--.I-ES 05014P EMv 161,800 T 9614. to _ 1 I I 1 \S I \4 I 20' awnu t (now bft*OW 1JI I I I I I IET IQAI,E A1ARSOIL 0 ,- .. 1 _ TIP REORVELOPMEPR DISTRICT o n 02 10UNDARIP.S I I DISTRICT DURATION 2010 I Inv 1,5DDt Q I I 1 I � a i-[ O f ° I l S" � � a 1 0101 I» Me' 9,too rpl06ty =� jl• U - I 050011 V IIOD ry V1/���� I 1= U• S• 1 pLT l /4�1 fi t E EMPT w I 1 5 I CI •' •, TANNER -QU16T`oso61t1 a 0 J I - l9 ui�db^�U511t1 a � 1 '1 "' h I 1 p - QIV 151.Orf T /441.6/1 _ EMv 141.100 'EMY{66. or I fig: 0d T P6 161.1II T 1u I./o I` 1 9 1 `► I g j 1' i 1 i% i' ; fb" J RIVE,0} 1170 IVER2IPAtR VIEW b i z G 1 -f1 lot -160 T116:6)600 •92 i N- o{lley5k 050111 8 k ►� Broadway OIY 114b6a I. EASURE II T90).90 ¢ /3 /a OSIV /11.8. \ S \ 7• 11 ( Env T /1.455.4 i I r CITT rOI IlWlrl I I I I I IET IQAI,E A1ARSOIL 0 ,- .. 1 _ o n )IV II I I 1ROA{11A1. CAUPUSA I Inv 1,5DDt Q I I 1 I �. TT DY 1RIIA11uAY ti1111A9E 1.1 nITED PARTNE4 o17srvD i-[ O f ° S" � I 1 0101 I» Me' 9,too rpl06ty =� jl• U - I 050011 V IIOD ry V1/���� I 1= U• S• 1 pLT l /4�1 fi t E EMPT w I 1 5 I CI •' r 111,496.11 05106 P11V 142,•600 t.mv 1 .LNv {e1 ,6001 T 1�, 2]0.1{ O5 20 I 1196 900 I a � 1 '1 "' h I 1 p - 1 • r 16.1ee�91 I fig: I` 1 9 1 `► I g j 1' i 1 i% i' ; fb" J 3 �/ J b i z G 9 io tt lot O\••K so Broadway HRA AGENDA APRIL 3. 1996 A. Reference and Backgmuod_ Jack Hutchinson, Local Postmaster, requested to be on the HRA agenda. Mr. Hutchinson will update the HRA on the potential plans of the West Broadway postal service and future expansion plans. Additionally, he and Administrator Wolfsteller request the HRA consider action to enforce the Development Contract between the HRA and Metcalf & Larson as the area now poses an unsafe and hazardous situation. Mr. Hutchinson was informed to contact the owner, Cinco Corporation. to be present at the meeting. Brad Larson has been contacted of the April 3 meeting. This issue has been reviewed by the HRA on numerous previous occasions. On January 11, 1995. the HRA recommended Brad Larson address a letter to the Cinco Corporation, owner, giving a 30 -day notice to close the driveway. The HRA's objective was to encourage the two property owners to resolve the problem or for Cinco Corporation to inquire to the City for purchase of the Old Hass property. Within the 1983 Development Agreement between the HRA and Metcalf/Larson, the developers agreed to file of record a twenty (20) foot wide easement for purposes of ingress and egress in favor of the City of Monticello to he approved by the City Attorney. NO record of the 20 foot easement exists. A letter dated September 6 from Brad Larson indicated a willingness of the developer to file the easement subject to the City entering into a Maintenance Agreement. ibe 1983 Development Contract has no provision relating to a Maintenance Agreement. On September 6, 1995, the HRA passed a motion of a "wait and see approach". Again, in hopes of encouraging the two property owners to resolve the issue of maintaining the driveway access to Locust or to encourage Cinco Corporation to contact the City of Monticello for consideration to purchase the old Hass property. The HRA elected not to seek legal advise in September. It appears the US Postal Service has on numerous occasions contacted the Administrator Wolfsteller, as previously the City promised the postal service access to Locust Street. Normally, the HRA takes the position "a contract is contract" and has stood behind the content of n contract. Attorney Bubul will attend the meeting to advise the HRA. Page I ms HRA AGENDA APRIL 3. 1996 B. Alternative Action.- 1. ction:I. A motion to stand behind the HRA recommendation of January 1 [.blockage of the driveway for purpose to encourage the two property owners to resolve the issue. Wait and see approach. 2. A motion subject to the advise of Attorney Bubul for enforcement of the Development Contract whereby the developer files a 20 -ft wide easement. 3. A motion subject to the advise of Attorney Bubul whereby the developer files a 20 -ft wide easement and the HRA and developer enter into a Maintenance Agreement. 4. A motion subject to the advise of Attorney Bubul whereby the developer files a 20 -ft wide easement and the City consider providing a temporary driveway through the old Hass property with an access to Linn Street. 5. A motion to table any action. C. Recommendation, Without legal advise. staff has not offered a firm recommendation. HRA members should keep in mind the potential of a new Redevelopment District and the relationship between the pedestrian traffic created by the post office and the activities of a successful community/riverfront development project. D. Supporting Data: September 6 agenda, Development Contract, map of the area, letters and minutes following. Page 2 1 v HRA AGENDA SEPTEMBER 5. 1995 Consideration to review for further direction the Develonment Agreement between t_he HRA aniLarson=Met.I:f.relatiny_to a 2G_ Poor. easement. Reference and Rackgy!nund_.. Within the leer week Larson/Metcalf blocked off the access from the Post Office to Lncust Stroot. On January 11, 1995: the HRA recommended Brad Larson address a letter to the Cinco Corporation (owner of the post uffic;n ben ding) giving a 3C - day notice to close the driveway. The HRA's objective was to oncouragp the two property owners to reaulvn the problom or for Cinco Corporation to inquire to the ratty for purchase of the old Hass Property. (Sen onclosod letter of April 75, 1995.) As Jctf O'Neill indicated at the January 11 meertng, the public has the right -to -cross. within the 1983 Developmont Agreement bRtween the HRA and Larson!Metca1f (the "developers"), the developers agroed to filo of r*corrl a twenty (20) tuot wide easrrment fur purposes of ingress and egress in favor of tho City of Monticello to hu approved by rhN City Attorney. No record of the 20 rant easement exists. Tho City does own a small strip of propprty tr, the north of the LarsonJMptcalf office building; however, the strip does not run westerly to a point joining the property owned by Cinco Corporation. Brad Larson has repear.eally requested the HRA or City to provide a temporary driveway for postal use with an access to Linn Street through the old Hass Property. Postmaster .Jack Hutchinson has callod Administrator wolfsteller stating the City promioed US Post Office an ingress and egress. Although City Administration does support the HRA's recommendation and objective, they do foul the public has the right -to -cross and that tho developers have not complied with the Develnpment Agroement of October 31, 19p3. Aftor dlacusslnn, tho HFA may wish to consider the following Alternatives. Altprnativo Actlnno: A motion to stand firmly bohlnd HAA rennmmondatlnn of January 11, encouraging the two property ownors to rroolvo tho isauo. page 1 i/D HAA AGENDA SEPTEMBER 6r 1995 y 2. A motion to obtain legal advise relating to possible enforcoment of the Dovwlopment Agraement. 3. A motion fur the HRA or City to provide.. a temporary driveway thronflh the Hass proporry with an access rn Linn StrAet. 4. A motion to take a "wait and see" approach. C. Staff recommendation: Tt appears the HRA and City has bran thn Aub act frir nut re sulvtny the i.aaue. Staff supports alternative No. 2 or 4. I1. Supporting Data: Development Agreement., Map, and Letter of April �5. //C DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ,r THIS AGREEMENT, executed this day October, 1983, by and between, the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (hereinafter referred to as "the HRA") and Bradley V. Larson and James G. Metcalf (hereinafter referred to as "the developers") set out provisions for the disposition of lands and the orderly development thereof in accordance with the Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan. The HRA and the Developers do hereby agree as follows: THE DEVELOPERS AGREE: 1. That development of land and all buildings shall be in accordance with this agreement, the Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan, and all other applicable, municipal ordinances. That for the purposes of establishing valuations for taxes payable, the building and appurtenant facilities to be first constructed on the following described real property, to -wit: The Northeasterly Fifty Feet of Lots Eight, Nine and Ten in Block Fifty, of the Village of Monticello, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Wright County Recorder, which parcel may also be described as follows: Commencing at the Northeasterly corner of lot Ten, Block Fifty, Townsite of Monticello; thence Southwesterly along the Easterly line of said Lot Ten a distance of Fifty Feet; thence Westerly at a right angle to the last described line across Lots Ten, Nine and Eight in said Block Fifty to the Westerly line of Lot 8; thence Northeasterly along the Westerly line of Lot Eight to the Northwesterly corner thereof; thence Easterly along the N line of Lots Eight, Nine and 'Den to the point of beginning, all in Block Fifty, Townsite of Monticello. AND That part of Lots 9 and 10, Block 80, Townsite of Monticello, described as follows: Beginning at the SE-ly corner of said Lot 10; thence NE-ly along the SE-ly line of said Int 10, a distance of 102.84 feet to a line parallel with and distant 62.00 feet SW-ly of, as measured at a right angle to the NE-ly line of said Lot 9 and 10; thence NW-ly along said parallel line, a distance of 40.21 feet to a line parallel with and distant 7.00 feet NW-ly of, as measured at a right angle to the SE-ly line of said Lot 9; thence SW-ly along said parallel line, a distance o1 102.86 feet to the SW-ly line of said Lot B; thence SE-ly along said SW-ly line and the SW-ly line of said Lot 10, a distance of 40.20 feet to the point of beginning. shall be deemed to be totally complete and assessed as such as of December 31, 1983. 3. That in the oven, the County Auditor or County Assessor will not record evaluations for a complete building prior to its actually being complete, Bradley V. Larson and James G. Metcalf will pay to HRA the difference between the tax increment based upon the partial building and the tar increment based upon the completed struc:ure. //F 4. That in any year in which the tax increment generated by the development does not meet or exceed the amount required by the HRA to meet its debt retirement demands, the developers shall pay directly to the HRA the difference between the actual tax increment collected, and the required debt retirement payment, said payment to be made no later than the 15th day of December in the year in which the taxes are due and payable. 5. That they shall purchase from the HRA the following described real property, to -wit: The Northeasterly Fifty feet of Lots Eight, Nine, and Ten, in Block Fifty of the Village of Monticello, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County. on or before the 16th day of November, 1983, and they shall remit payment in the sum of $10,000.00 to the HRA on the date of purchase. 6. That no "project land" acquired by the developers from the HRA may be resold prior to improvements being made without the prior written consent o1 the HRA. 7. That there shall be no discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, creed or national origin in the sale, lease, transfer or occupancy of the property covered by this agreement. 8. That the property shall be devoted only to the uses that fall within the scope of the Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan for a period of twenty (20) years from the date of this agreement. 9. That, except where physically impossible. all public and private utilities serving the parcels within this agreement shall be under- ground. CD. Developers agree to file of record a twenty (20) foot .ride easement. for purposes of ingress and egress in favor of the City of Monticell to be approved by the City Attorney. THE HRA AGREES: 1. That the HRA will convey to the Developer title to the following described real property, to -wit: The Northeasterly Fifty feet of lots Eight, Nine, and Ten, in Block Fifty of the Village of Monticello, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County. on or before the 18th day of November, 1983, for the sum of $10,000.r 2. That, prior to the conveyance of title to the developers, the HRA will demolish existing structures and generally prepare the site for now construction. -2- // G 3. That they will provide a deed to the following described real property, to -wit: The Northeasterly Fifty feet of Lots Eight, Nine, and Ten, in Block Fifty of the Village of Monticello, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County. 4. That for all sales of land referred to herein, the cost is the total cost. No existing special assessments shall be transferred to the developers, unless the developers request such transfer. The HRA further agrees that when the price agreed upon herein is paid by the developers to the HRA, the title to the parcel will be transferred free of all encumbrances. FOR THE HRA FOR THKEVELOPERS Phnlipit4h to //� dleyoMetcalf n Thomas A. Eidem Jam G This �day of November, 1987. Z�24_12Z Notary Public ' 10 NUT AW PUNJO-AMPIW A Mr am" XV AM n, tm Alelcafl & eCa,jo 1 ATTORNEYS AT LAW pa aw ue Momcaro. Mw 5-w. SS. 4"G JAMES G. METCALF TELEPNCNE eRAOLEYV URsoN (B1O April 25, 1995 AR M T ce, 2) 421.339.7 FAX (6121 295-7172 Cinco Corporation P. O. Box 185 St. Cloud, Minnesota 56302-1185 Gentlemen: Please be advised that we are the adjoining land owners to the east of the post office. I believe you own the building and rent to the United State Post Office department. Over the years we have had some discussion with your predecessors in title with regard to the driveway that your patron's use through our parking lot. In the past there has been no desire on the part of you or your tenants to participate in the cost of maintaining the driveway which exists primarily for your benefit. Therefore, we are putting you on notice that on August 1, 1995, the drive will be terminated at our common boundary lines unless, prior to that time, you contact us and we reach an accord with regard to future sharing of expenses with regard to the driveway and its maintenance. Respectfully yours, METCALF 6 LARSON A:� v / By: Bradley V. Ifsod, isq. BVL/gla / cc: United State Post Office ATTENTION: Pootm{Lstor City of Monticello J ATTENTION: Jeff O'Neill Broadway Partners // i Alt -at` & fauon ATTORNEYS AT LAW )U '+.ba 5roaa.+v P O.a."S Mpn w. M� 55M.0-6 BRAOLEvV LARSON TELEPHONE JAMES G METCALF. OF COUkUL (812) 295-= (W5,g9)1 FAX August 31, 1995 (612)295-],72 Carol A. Gabriel Real Estate Specialist United States Postal Service 6800 W. 64th Street, Suite 100 Overland Park, Kansas 66202-4171 Re: Monticello Post Office access Dear Ms. Gabriel: I am in receipt of your letter dated August 28, 1995, and a copy of the deed whereby Monticello Ford reserved an easement for ingress and egress over the 12' strip. I was out of the office on August 29th. I do not know if the City or Monticello Ford ever granted an easement to your landlord. when we constructed an office building next door, the City caused us to relocate the driveway. I do know the City and your landlord will not take responsibility for the driveway that is primarily used by your patrons. In any event, the easement reservation would appear to be void as there was a historical gap between our office building and your landlord's property. Neither Monticello Ford, Inc. or the City of Monticello can grant or reserve an easement over property that they never had title to. we have since acquired that strip. I have no desire to create a hardship for you or your patrons but the failure of your landlord to communicate and the City's position that it has no responsibility forces the issue. I am willing to negotiate a driveway license agreement for your use of the driveway. The various owners of our parking lot have spent thousands of dollars over the years for snow removal and maintenance. The traffic current flow also presents a safety hazard. Your landlord can provide you with an alternative access via adjacent City owned property and increased parking that would facilitate a safer traffic flow onto another public street. I am open to any suggestions but the barricade posts will remain until a resolution is reached. I suggest your landlord approach the City regarding an alternate access. This action should come as no surprise to you since your landlord, the Post Office and the City were put on notice of what I intended to do back on April 25, 1995. I enclose a copy of that letter in the event that you were not provided with one. Carol A. Gabriel Page Two August 31, 1995 Please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully yours, METCALF, LARSON�%6 MUTE e By: X. -I Bradley V. Laison, Esq. BVL/gls Enclosure cc: Monticello Post Office ATTN: Jack City of Monticello v ATTN: 011ie /I X Th.- rwc: did agree to axtvnd t.ha r?at: . execution of the Purchase and Development Conr.rar.r rn 11:59 u.m.. October S. 1':,45. CONSIDERATTON TO REVIEW FOR FIJRTHRR DIRECTION THE DEVELOPMENT 11GREEMENT BETWEEN THE ,HRa AHD LARS�T7`METr.AI.F_RELATING TO A.20 FOOT EASEMETIT. Since the post off,ict: Arress to Locust Street was blorked. Administrator Wolfsteller has heard from tho US Posta] Sorvic In St. Louis. He informed postal service of Development Agreement between the HRA and Larson/Metcalf relating to the 20 foot easemenr. Koropchale informed memhers that Brad Larson was faxed a :opy of the Development Agrooment of 1983. With an Incorrecr fax numher, the fax was just received today. Brad Larson has not responded at this point. After a brief discpssion, A] Larson made A motion to rake a "wait and see approach." Roucr Carlson seenndod the motion and with no further discission, the motion passed unanimously. CONSIDERATTnIl TO REVIEW FOR FURTHER DIRECTION THE COMPARIBCN BETWEEN THE TAX ZNCREMENT_GIIARANTEE _AND THE_ TAX. INCREMENT RE(:ETVHD RELATING TO CERTAIN TIF DISTRICTS. HRA mombers reviewers the information provided In rh:: agenda supplement, and asked why the shortfalls. Although sumo Individual dintriets may nnrrttnt their shortfall print, to decertification throu3h an increase in the estimated market value. tho main reason for the shortfall is the rosult of the reduction of the preferred r,lasstfiration rates for commerctal and Industrial property. With the HRA's h,.Iief "a contract Is a rontraot", Al Larson made a motion authurizing the Issuanrt, of an annual tax inr.rement guarantee shortfall notir.e (not due anti payahle) with an explanation that the HRA will nnmpare for compliance the Intal amount of tax Inr.rement receIvrd upon decortlfication of the dlatrlct and the tax increment guarantee. Thin for TTF District Nos. 1-8 NSP, 1-9 Tappers, 1-1n Remmele, and 1-12 Arnplax. Also, the motion authorized a aonond lotter he Issued to .Tay Morrell relating to rhe $13,001.90 tax Incrumont guarantee shortfall due and payahl,� for dunortifed TTF Dititrict Noa. 1-1 and 1-4. Rngcr Carlann n�nundpd the motion. Additionally, the HRA tattled any TI Uuaranteu cnfnrcemont decisions until such time as nor.ssoary. With no furth4.r dlsnasGinn, the motlnn paac+ad unanlmnusly. KnropchAte repnrtnd tho City Adminiarratnr was notifled by the State 0t�iaartmont of Rovunuo that tho City of Montint-11o'o Tax Increment A1,1 R.dur.tion (HACA Penalty) for 1998 !s $11,611 for Pagu 2 // L Y HRA AGENDA OCTOBER 4.1995 1 7 1 il: 1 1. 114 1. 1 .l 11 . ll 1, : l: 1 .. 1..1 1 i lil 'I 11 In order to encourage the two property owners to resolve the issue of maintaining the driveway access to Locust or to encourage Cinco Corporation to contact the City of Monticello for consideration to purchase the old Hass propoerty, the HRA recommended Metcalf & Larson address a letter to Cinco Corporation giving a 30 - day notice to close the driveway. On September 6, 1995, the HRA faxed Brad Larson a copy of the Development Agreement between the HRA and Metcalf and Larson wherein the developers agreed to file of record a twenty foot wide easement for the purposes of ingress and egress in favor of the City of Monticello to be approved by the City Attorney. In order to allow time for Brad Larson to respond to the HRA fax, the commissioners passed a motion of a "wait and see approach". The attached letter (Letter #1) from Brad Larson is a response to the fax. To improve communications and upon HRA Chairperson approval, the Executive Director submitted the copy of the Development Agreement to Cinco Corporation. See attached Letter q:. This is a fellowup agenda item for informational purposes and the HRA may wish to continue the "wait and see approach" since little time has lapsed from the date of the two attached letters. Page I HM City of Monticello 250 East Broadway P. O. Box 1147 Monticello, Minnesota 55362-9245 ATTENTION: 011ie Dear 011ie: Thank you for your fax of today attaching the 1983 Development Agreement between Jim and I and the City. we had not been able to find an executed copy. With regard to paragraph 10 wherein we agreed to file a twenty foot (20') wide easement in favor of the City of Monticello to be approved by the City Attorney, as I recall, that was never done. I am willing to file a formal easement in favor of the City which I assume would be assigned to the post office landlord but I think it appropriate a Maintenance Agreement be entered into or, since it is going to be a public easement, that the maintenance be borne by the City. If the City is not interested in entering into s Maintenance Agreement or maintaining the easement, maybe it is appropriate at this point in time to look at opening up the "Hass" lot access. Thanksl BVL/gls cc: David Hyttsten Respectfully yours, METCALF, LARSLARSON b MUTH By: //�1 Bradley V. Larson, Esq. L et e r \ ,Va. f X.On & AUd ATTORNEYS AT LAW ]U NAo Bload"y P.O am 4M MaucMW M-49= SSM 4&4 BRADLEY V. LARSON TELEPHONE STEVEN J.MUTH September 6, 1995 (612) 9� LIMES O.METCALF. OFCO Q (untm lsl�FA6Jt�2 City of Monticello 250 East Broadway P. O. Box 1147 Monticello, Minnesota 55362-9245 ATTENTION: 011ie Dear 011ie: Thank you for your fax of today attaching the 1983 Development Agreement between Jim and I and the City. we had not been able to find an executed copy. With regard to paragraph 10 wherein we agreed to file a twenty foot (20') wide easement in favor of the City of Monticello to be approved by the City Attorney, as I recall, that was never done. I am willing to file a formal easement in favor of the City which I assume would be assigned to the post office landlord but I think it appropriate a Maintenance Agreement be entered into or, since it is going to be a public easement, that the maintenance be borne by the City. If the City is not interested in entering into s Maintenance Agreement or maintaining the easement, maybe it is appropriate at this point in time to look at opening up the "Hass" lot access. Thanksl BVL/gls cc: David Hyttsten Respectfully yours, METCALF, LARSLARSON b MUTH By: //�1 Bradley V. Larson, Esq. L et e r \ Z50 East Broadway P. O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362.9245 Phone: (612) 295.2711 Metro: (612) 333.5739 Fax: (612) 295.4404 Cinco Corporation P.O. Box 185 St. Cloud, MN 56302-1185 Gentlemen: September 27, 1995 Enclosed is a copy of the Development Agreement between the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and Bradley V. Larson and James G. Metcalf. As noted the developers agreed to file of record a twenty (20) foot wide easement for purposes of ingress and egress in favor of the City of Monticello to be approved by the City Attorney. There is no mention of the HRA agreeing to enter into a Maintenance Agreement relating to 20 foot wide easement. As property owners, you may wish to consider participation in the cost for maintaining the easement or driveway to appease your tenant. the United States Post Office. Also enclosed aro copies of letters from Bradley V. Larson dated April 25. 1995. and September 6, 1995. Sincerely, HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO 011Exec Koropchak Direc Executive Director cc: United States Post Office, Postmaster Bradley V. Larson, Attorney at Law � HRA File n0 HRA MINUTES NOVEMBER I. 1995 meeting: thereafter, will the Council consider all recommendations for direction of commission appointments in January, 1996. •. • . r•. • :• a.l •; ula.r • r. ula►r Will 1XINIIIIIII. W (IIN r a Administrator Wolfsteller requested the HRA consider enforcement of their agreement with Metcalf/Larson relating to the 20 ft easement. If the HRA has no plans to enforce their agreement, Mr. Wolfsteller may bring the matter before the City Council for consideration to block -off the City -owned property behind the Metcalf/Larson building or for the Council to consider a temporary access through the old Hass property. HRA members felt the benefactor of the 20 ft easement was the Post Office and perhaps they should consider entering into a maintanence agreement with Metcalf/Larson. HRA members suggested Koropchak invite Brad Larson to the December HRA meeting to determine the HRA's role if any. OTHER BUSINESS_: a) Authorization to pay bills - The HRA monthly bills. b) Koropchak invited and encouraged NAHRO Conference on November interest if his calendar was clear. t : • • :.� ula1r The HRA meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. O QCy-� X d1 "(�� o-' 011ie Koropchak. Executive Director Page 4 authorized payment of the enclosed members of the HRA to attend the 30. Chairperson Laron expressed // V0 HRA MLWTES JANUARY 10. 1996 limitation. the HRA recommended the Council consider the request for assistance. Other - The HRA members accepted Brad Larson's satisfaction of the blocked easement as it relates to non-maintanence agreement between the owners. The RRA meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m. Z) %-,:,h 0 u 011ie Koropchak, Executive Director Page 6 // Q Council Agenda - 4/22/96 12. Consideration to anno nt skn EDC renresen ative to thp FDA, (O.K.) On February 14, 1996, Harvey Kendall submitted his resignation as a member of the IDC and EDA. Mr. Kendall and Ron Hoglund were the two original IDC representatives to the EDA. In January 1996, Council members reappointed Mr. Hoglund to the EDA after reconsideration of an earlier Council policy which enacted a city residency requirement for commission members. The Council agreed each commission should be reviewed separately for membership appointment. At the IDC meeting on March 21, 1996, the IDC approved a motion recommending the appointment of Ken Maus as the IDC representative to the EDA replacing the seat vacated by Harvey Kendall. This five-year staggered term expires December 1996. Although Mr. Maus resides outside the city limits, the IDC felt Maus's previous experience in government and his vested interest in the community through his business were of value to the !JDA. According to HKA Attorney Steve Bubul, EDA Statutes allow a board member or member of an advisory board of a lending institution to serve on an EDA. No "conflict of interest" prevails. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. A motion to approve the appointment of Ken Maus as the IDC representative to the EDA. Expiration date of term is December 1996. 2. A motion to deny approval of Ken Maus. 3. A motion to table any action. C_ STAFF F..O MF.NDATION: The City Administrator and the Economic Development Director support the recommendation and rational of the IDC in alternative N1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Lotter of resignation from Harvey Kendall; Copy of the January 8, 19%. Council minutes. 12 February 14, 1996 OQie Koropc6ak Economic Development Director 250 East Bmadway Mofflkao, Ma Dear 011ie, Pkaw except this kner as my rudgmtion bum rho Industrial Development Commmee and the Ecaromm Davdopmeat Agency. I have egjoyed worbV with these groups aver dw yeah. I fed dud through these groups I haves b= abk to connibwe to the growth and betterment of Womb. I know with your leadership they wM continuo to attract new bWud iea and to assist existing mduarks to grow with this community. I thanlr you and all the cormeim members for dteir commitment to making MontiwDo a great place to lirvo. 4'Co Iiarwy K«rdan /a, A Council Minutes - V8/96 A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO ACCEPT THE HIGH BID OF $10,500 FROM RICK AND CHERYL SRNSKY FOR THE HOUSE AT 1501 HART BOULEVARD, WITH FULL PAYMENT AND PROOF OF INSURANCE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE HOUSE BEING MOVED. Motion carried unanimously. 12. Consideration of annual appointments for 1996. Councilmember Shirley Anderson stated that she considered Bret Weiss of WSB a valuable asset to the City due to his 6-7 years of experience in Monticello as City Engineer. THEREFORE, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPOINT WSB AS THE CITY ENGINEER. MAYOR FYLE THEN AMENDED THE MOTION TO APPOINT WSB AS THE CITY ENGINEER AND REVIEW THE APPOINTMENT IN SDI MONTHS. It was noted by the Assistant Administrator that a staff meeting had been scheduled to define the role of the City Engineer. The City Administrator stated that WSB's fee structure was unknown at this time and that fees should be reviewed prior to appointing an engineer. IT WAS THE CONSENSUS OF COUNCIL TO TABLE THE MOTION TO APPOINT WSB AS THE CITY ENGINEER UNTIL THE JANUARY 22,1996, COUNCIL MEETING. Council then discussed the remaining list of appointments. The City Administrator reported that he would meet with the City Attorney, Paul Weingarden, to critique his services of the past year. Mayor Fyle recommended that the City not formally appoint a City Planner and utilize Northwest Associated Consultants on an as -needed basis for the time being. ­-AW� "-ft— Councilmember Herbst noted that Ron Hoglund's term on the Economic Development Authority had expired and, according to a policy recently • _ enacted by Council, could not be reappointed due to the city residency ..'`L. requirement; however, it was Herbst's view that each commission should be reviewed separately for member appointments. Due to Hoglund's experience on the EDA and his vested interest in the community through his business, Herbst recommended that Hoglund be reappointed to the EDA at this time. Herbst also noted that Diane Herbst would be willing to fill one of the vacancies on the Library Board. Page 9 / , G Council Minutes - I/8/96 Library Board: 1. Ed Solberg 12/96 (3 -year staggered) 2. Duff Davidson 12197 2. Warren Smith 3. Vacant 12/96 4. Ruby Bensen 12/97 12(97 6. Diane Herbst 12198 Attorney: Paul Weingarden Planner. No appointment at this time Auditor. Gruys, Borden, Carlson & Assoc, Recycling Committee: Shirley Anderson Economic Development 2. Larry Nolan Authority (6 -year staggered terms): 1. Tom Perrault, Council 12/96 2. Clint Herbst, Council 12/98 12/98 3. Harvey Kendall 12!96 li 6. Steve Andrews 4. Al Larson 12-107 6. Barb Schwientek 12/98 6. Bill Demeules 12199 7. Ron Hoglund 1212000 Engineer(s): WSB & Associates and Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates (MOTION FOR APPT. WAS TABLED UNTIL IWM MEETING) Police Advisory Commission (3 -year staggered terms): 1. Brian Stumpf, Council 17(98 2. Warren Smith 12197 3. David Gerads 12(97 4. Vacant 12(98 6. Liz DeMarais 12/96 Parke Commission: 1. Earl Smith 12/98 (3 -yr staggered terms) 2. Larry Nolan 12/98 3. Fran Fair 12197 4. Bruce Thielon 12/98 6. Steve Andrews 12(98 Motion carried unanimously. Page 11 �� Council Agenda - 4/22/96 13. Con_aideration of proposalg for re la . nBligbt fixtures In city 1 All and liquor store. (R. W. ) While the purpose of this item is to consider replacement of light fixtures at both city hall and liquor store, the Council may want to consider each location separately. LIQUOR STORE The current lighting over the display floor area at the liquor store consists of 36,200 -watt, incandescent bulbs. The projected light output is approximately 39 footcandles, and the annual consumption is estimated at 31,450 kilowatts per year. The light fixtures are not very energy efficient, and there are programs available through NSP through direct rebates that encourage customers to consider retrofitting their lighting systems to a more efficient type of fixture such as fluorescent lights. Wes Olson of Olson & Sons Electric, along with Owen Clark of Muska Lighting, has put together a proposal that would include changing the incandescent lamps to 36 fluorescent lamp fixtures that could produce energy savings of approximately $719 annually. The proposed cost to install the new fluorescent light fixtures would amount to $4,505, which results in a payback period of 5 Va years based on the estimated annual savings. In discussing the change -over with Liquor Store Manager Joe Hartman, he is in favor of the switch, as he feels the improved lighting would be beneficial to the store in the long run. If financing is a problem for a conversion, NSP does have programs available that allow you to basically pay for the change- over with your energy eavings, and 1 believe the loan is calculated at approximately 9% interest. CITY HALL As you are aware, the lighting in city hall consists of various hockey puck hanging light fixtures that are to light the work place by reflecting light off of the ceiling with 400 -watt halogen light bulbs. Although the light fixtures were certainly an interesting feature in the architectural design of city hall, l have to admit they haven't been the best fixture for producing adequate light. Council Agenda - 4/22/96 I've received numerous comments over the years from employees that they did not think the lighting was adequate, and you may have noticed that we have had to use individual lights at desk locations as a supplement. Mr. Owen Clark, the sales representative for Muska Lighting Center in Roseville, in conjunction with Wes Olson, put together a proposal that would change all the lighting fixtures in city hall to a fluorescent type fixture mounted near the ceiling that could produce dramatic energy savings and, at the same time, increase substantially the amount of light being produced. It is projected that we could reduce our energy consumption by over 2/3 with new fluorescent, deep cell light fixtures and save up to $2,800 annually in electrical cost. In addition, we would be eligible for a $2,900 rebate from NSP to help defray the cost of the conversion. One of the concerns I had initially on this type of change -over was in the appearance of the new light fixtures. Basically speaking, the hanging hockey pucka would be removed, and a rectangular wood -framed fluorescent light fixture unit would be mounted near the ceiling level with the floor surface. According to Mr. Clark's calculations, the City would more than double the light output we are presently receiving with the new fluorescent light fixtures, but I'm sure the change in architectural appearance would be very noticeable at first. The total cost of the conversion is proposed at $16,218; and after the NSP rebate, the estimated payback in energy savings would be approximately 4.7 years. While I believe the conversion makes sense for a number of reasons, including increased light output, better working conditions, and energy saving features, it's possible we may want to install one or two units on a trial basis to get an idea of the type of light output :t would produce and to get a better handle on the appearance of the unit. This might be an alternative to proceeding with the full conversion. DECISION 1: LIQUOR STORE Council could authorize the replacement of t10 existing incandescent lamps at the liquor store vrith 36 fluorescent light fixtures ata cost of $4,606. Ido not authorize the replacement at this limo. Council Agenda - 4122/96 DECISION 2: CITY HALL Council could authorize the conversion of the existing light fixtures with new fluorescent fixtures as proposed. Council could approve the concept of replacing the light fixtures but first authorize only one or two light fixtures to be replaced to be comfortable with the light output and/or appearance before the entire city hall is changed. Do not authorize replacement at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: From a strictly energy-saving concept, it appears feasible with a payback of 5-6 years that both the liquor store and the city hall would be viable candidates for replacing the light fixtures with fluorescent fixtures. The energy savings in the long run and the increased light output would be beneficial for both locations. 1 believe the appearance is more of an issue at city hall than it would be at the liquor store; and I would suggest that if the Council is in favor of conversion at city hall, it be contingent upon a trial conversion of one or two fixtures first. Otherwise, I believe the employees would be in favor of increased light that a fluorescent fixture will produce over the light we currently have now. D. SUPPORTINO DATA: Copy of cost proposals and energy savings summaries for liquor store and city hall conversions. Olson & Sons Electric enc. 240 West Oakwood Drive Monticello. M`i. 55362 (612)295-2690 FAX (612)295-2691 February 26th, 1996 City of Monticello Hi Way Liquors South Hwy 25 Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Joe, I have reviewed the existing lighting system above your display showroom, and would strongly recommend replacing the existing trac lighting for 2 reasons. 1.) They aro incandescent and aro not energy efficient, 2.) The fixture types are no longer available, and replacement is diftuit in the event of breakdowns. Below. I have fisted the existing energy consumption's vs. 2 other option, along with ittstaman costs and payback periods. If you have any question& please feel free to call anytime. Thank You Wesley J. Olson Olsgn � ectric Inc. + b Existing System: Approx. 39 Foot candles. 36 - 200 wan incandescent lamps = 7.2 KW 7.2 KW x 14 nus. per day = 100.8 KW per day 100.8 x 6 days per week - 604.8 KW per week 604.8 x 52 weeks = 31,449.6 KW per year. Option•#l: Approx 53 Foot candler 30 - 8' 41amp T8 fixtures ® 107w each = 3.21 KW 3.21 x 14 hrs. - 44.94 KW per day 44.94 x 6 days per week - 269.64 KW per week 269.64 x 52 weeks - 14,021.28 KW per year Energy saving 17,428.32 x .031 - $540.28 per year Demand Savinge 4 KW x 6.61 x 12 - 5317.28 ver year 857.56 eavmgs per year Cost of retrofit - S 4,058.24 NSP rebate - 598.50 4.03 yrs. payback. Normally retrofits have a better payback period, lin in this ease you am installing new fixtures u well as retrofits, so the imual msiallation costs are greater. thus payback period longer. NSP rebates are aareuly at 150 pa KW savktgs. Option 412: Approx 58 Foot candler (Recommended) 36 Fixtures, 6 in each row, (as opposed to 5 in option 01) Energy savings, 14.632.91.031, $453.62 Demand savings 3.35 KW x 6.61 x 12 s U-03, 719.30 sa%ings per scar Cost of retrofit - S 4,505.10 NSP rebate - 502.50 5.56 year payback. • A1I emW mvtttgs an bawd oo Published «hsduln ham Na "Irm Stapp Paver Cetapmp. /3#4 Olson 8 Sons Electric Inc. 240 West Oakwood Drive / P.O. Box 686 Monticello, MN. 55362 Date of Quotation: 02/26/19 Hi Way Liquors South Hwy. 25 Monticello, MN. 55362 Dear Joe, The undersigned Contractor agrees to supply and install the necessary Electrical Equipment, for the description of the project as stated below. This quote is good for 30 dais from above date, and is subject to the provisions listed below. If you have any questions, Please feel free to call anytime. Thank you. Wes Olson Olson b Sons Electric Inc. Contract Amount 84,058.24 1.) The material and workmanship furnished shall comply with the rules and regulations set forth in the Current version of the National Electrical Code. and all State and local rules governing such work. The price quoted includes customary Insurance, Permits, and Inspection Fees. 2.) Any changes or additions to this proposal, or the work installed as specified, sha11 be made in writing, setting forth the details of such changes and costs thereof, and signed by both parties. 3.) All equipment and devices installed as part of this proposal shall be guaranteed for a period of one year from installation. Contractors liability shall be limited to cost of replacement of defoctive parts. Location: Liquor Store, Main Showroom Display Area. Description of work performed; Remove existing lighting b replace with energy effifient flourescont lighting. Install 30 8' fixtures, with 2' between each. —PURCHASERS ACCEPTANCE-- QPM_. `I Respectively submitted, The proposal ao outlined above is C1 1 accepted. My signature is full Cls.lr. acceptance of agreement,and order E ectricel Contractor to commence. Quote #:WES0226-1 Date by Data 6 !38 Olson & Sons Electric Inc. 240 West Oakwood Drive P.O. Box 686 Monticello, MN. 55362 Date of Quotation: 02/26/19 ii Way Liquors South Hwy. 25 Monticello, MN. 55362 Dear Joe, The undersigned Contractor agrees to supply and install the necessary Electrical Equipment, for the description of the project as stated below. This quote is good for 30 days from above date, and is subject to the provisions listed below. If you have any questions, please feel free to call anytime. Thank you. Wes Olson a b � Olson S Sons ectric Inc. Contract Amount $4,505.10 1.) The material and workmanship furnished shall comply with the rules and regulations set forth in r,he Current version of the National Electrical Code, and all State and local rules governing such work. The price quoted includes customary Insurance. Permits, and Inspection Fees. 2.) any changes or additions to this proposal, or the work installed as spvcifi,ed, shall be made in writing, setting forth the details of such changes and costs thereof, and signed by both parties. 3.) All equipment and devices installed as part of this proposal shall be guaranteed for a period of one year from installation. Contractors liability sh 11 b3 limiLed to cost of replacement of defective parts. Location: Liquor Store, Main Showroom Oieplay Area. Doscriptio n of work performod: Remove existing lighting b replace with energy effifient floureacent lighting. Install 36 8' fixtureo, with 6' from each wall. —PURCHASERS ACCEPTANCE— Dp�`� F � Roopoctively submitted, Tho proposal so outlinod above is c accepted. My aignaturo is full o),—)%. P'), T, acceptanco of agroomont,and order Electrical Contractor to commence. Ouoto a:WES0226-1 Date by _41L Date d �c /3 C� AN I-Nf_RGY SAVING PROPOSAL FOR CITY OF MONTICELLO 250 EAST BROADWAY MONTICELLO MN 55362-9245 295.27» ATTN. RICK WOLFSTELLER ML Wi LKWNO CEW(A IPOs W COWN AM GQ AOSOALE MN SS 113 6338157 FAX 6334073 /3z) CO. NAME CITY OF MONTICELLO ADDRESS: 250 EAST BROADWAY CITY: MONTICELLO ST. 8 21P: MN 55302.9215 PHONEM 295.2711 CONTACT RICK WOLFSTELLER INPUT DATA MONTICLO WB 1 _i J OLD LOCATION EQUIPMENT 1 COUNCIL CHAMBERS MERC 4DOW INDIRECT 2 CITY OFFICES MERC IOMY INDIRECT 7 OFFICES 8 RESTROOMS MERC IOOW INDIRECT 1 OFFICES WO WRAP 5 OFFICES 210 WRAP S OFFICES 210 STRIP 7 EXIT SIGNS STD INCANDESCENT B FOYER INDIRECT FLUORESCE B FOYER INDIRECT FLUORESCE 10 TAX RATE MONTICLO WB 1 _i J IS -AW -OB RICK WOLFSTELLER UTILITY: NORTHERN STATES POWER onwocwwaeeREAKoowN DEMAND CHARGE 559.92 WKrERIII 0NTM5) 20.81 KWHCHARGE: 0.021 sumwRpmoNTHs1 $9.28 REBATE IKMI 200 TAX RATE 100.95% 2.13 166uRC1uR0E ON EACH 811 FIXTURE FIXTURE HOURS NEW NEW FIXTURE LAMPSI WATTS QUARIM OF USE EQUIPMENT WATTS QUANTITY FIXTURE 151 B 1600 NEW PENDANT MT PARABOL 107 5 1 151 22 2000 NEW PENDANT MT PARASOL 107 22 1 151 11 2000 NEW PENDANT MT PARASOL 107 11 1 175 2 2000 OTIX32 BALLAST 107 2 1 Be 2 2000 072X72 BALLAST SB 2 2 BO 1 7000 QT2X72 BALLAST SB 1 2 50 1 6760 LED EXIT KIT 2 / 1 BB 1 2000 OT/X72 BALLAST 107 2 1 Be 1 2000 QT2X72 BALLAST 56 1 2 6760 IS -AW -OB RICK WOLFSTELLER CITY OF MONTICELLO 250 EAST BROADWAY MONTICELLO MN 55362-0245 NEW AND OLD ENERGY COMPARISON MONTICLO WB1 16 -APF -98 OF OLD KW OLD LOCATION WATTS SAVED COST WATTS COST SAVO S REBATE I I COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3632 2.776 5495.48 856 5118.78 $37870 5555.20 21 CITY OFFICES 9988 7.634 $1,827.00 2354 5430.59 $1,396.41 $1,526.80 3 OFFICES 8 RESTROOMS 4994 3 817 $913.50 1177 $215.30 $698.21 $763.40 4.OFFICES 350 0.136 564.02 214 $39.14 $24.88 $27.20 51OFFICES 176 0.06 $32.19 116 $2122 $10.98 $12.00 61 OFFICES 88 0.03 $16.10 58 $1061 $5.49 $6.00 7T, EXIT SIGNS 200 0,192 $72.30 8 $2.89 $69.40 $38.40 8' FOYER 352 0,138 $6439 214 $39.14 $25.24 $27.60 6iFOYER 88 0.03 $16.10 58 $1061 $5.49 $6.00 101 0 0 $0.00 0 SO 00 $000 $0.00 19868 14.813 53.501.08 5059 5686 29 $2.614. /9 52,9V.tl0 MONTICLO WB1 16 -APF -98 OF CITY OF MONTICELLO 260 EAST BROADWAY MONTICELLO MN 55362-9245 295.2711 SUMMARY PAGE TOTAL EXISTING WATTS 1 198681 TOTAL NEW WATTS 1 50551 TOTAL WATTS SAVED 1 148131 TOTAL PROPOSED AMOUNT 1 $16,218.49' APPROXIMATE REBATE 1 $2,962.601 NET PRICE (LESS REBATE) $13,255.89 1 PAYBACK IN YEARS 4.651 APPROXIMATE ANNUAL SAVINGS $2,848.82 I RETURN ON INVESTMENT 1 21.49%1 PERCENT OF WATTAGE REDUCED 1 74.56%1 MONTICLO.WBI 18 Apr•96 13 G I UTILITY ENERGY FINANCE PROGRAM for CITY OF MONTICELLO 9.00% Interest Rate I $16,218.49 Proposal Price 60 Tenn In Months I $2,962.60 Rebate Amount 3.00% inflation Rate i $13,255.89 Net Proposal Price Manitenance Ravings 1 52,848.82 Annual Savings $275.17 Monthly Payment 1 $237.40 Avg. Mo. Savings MONTICLO.WBt 16 -Apr -95 /3 TEN YEAR CASH FLOW ANALYSIS Annual Energy Annual Finance Annual Cashflow Year Savings Payments Increase 1 12,848.82 $3,302.05 I ($45323)1 2 $2`934.28 $3,302.05 I ($387,76)1 3 $3.022.31 I $3 302.05 I ($279.74) 4 $3,112.98 1 $3302.05 l$189.07jJ 8 13,406.37 1 53.302.05 I (_$95.88)jj 6 1 13.302.56 ! $0.00 1 $3.302.58 7 1 13.401.64 I $0.00 $3401.64 a 1 $3`503.69 1 $0.00 $3.50369 1 9 1 13`608.80 1 $0.00 53`608.80 10 1 $3.717.06 1 $0.00 I $3.717.08 Ten Year Total 1 $32,858.50 $16,510.231 I $16,148.271 MONTICLO.WBt 16 -Apr -95 /3 CITY OF MONTICELLO retrofit feature & benefits features benefits FLUORESCENT 74 LAMPS P Newest technology P Excellent color rendition 0 Better lumen rnsintenance d Smaller diameter lamp 0 More energy efficient b Uses existing fixtures b New system ELECTRONIC T -S BALLASTS b Newest technology d Cooler operatinglemperalure 0 New system 0 Environmentallyfriendly Take advantage of best product available. Flesh tone colors are much better. Gives more light over Its life. More compact so easier to store. Better fixture efficiency. Higher lumens per watt results in more light for the energy dollar. Meets or exceeds all federal energy codes for efflcie No need to purchase expensive new fixtures or change established look. Lamps have two (2) year warranty. Less maintenance costs since lamps as long or linlyer Iran present. Uses T -S lamps. Less weight and more energy efficient than present, Operates 25 degrees C cooter so air conditioning costs are reduced and ballast life is double over present. Ballasts have five (S) year warranty; Less maintenance costs. Ballasts contain no harmful PCB's or other chemical MONTICLO.WBt 16 -Apr -0 / J MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC 1945 County Rose C•2 240 WEST OAl(yY00D DRiCE ROSEVILLE, MN MONTICELLO, MN 55113 sb352 WITH CITY OF MONTICELLO 260 EAST BROADWAY MONTICELLO MN $5362-9245 ATTN.: RICK WOUSTELLER We propose to supply the following equlpnmt required for your new energy efficient lighting system: 155 Osram-SyMmla T4 fluorescent temps e ENctrordo Eefeste with fin (5) YEAR WARRANTY LED salt Wts It New f tutee 1) Used Writs ane bs5aste remain fro pop" of f4 owner. 2) Requests for additional or vAn A n to apeafbd equipment "be in wntrp end be amled to arry apphcaNa price messes 3) Prices goof for (tiny (30) days, PROPOSED PRICE: SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS X Customer Approval Date 1 $16,218.49' /3 110", 13K Council Agenda - 4/22/96 The current two-year union contract with the 8 -member public works department maintenance staff expired April 1, 1996; and over the past few weeks, negotiations have been taking place with union representatives along with myself and Council representative Clint Herbst. The meetings have resulted in a tentative agreement on a new package that is being outlined for Council ratification. As is typically the case, the negotiations started with a list of changes the union wanted to see in the contract, and again this year was no exception. The original proposals by the union included: 1. A change in the work schedule from 7:30 - 4:30 to 7:30 - 4 p.m., with the 1/2 -hour reduction occurring over the lunch hour. 2. A request for all hours worked prior to a 7:30 a.m. start to be paid an additional $1 per hour for shift differential. 3. Modify the vacation and sick leave benefits for the groundskeeper/maintenance worker from the present 75% of benefits to a full 100%. 4. Modify the sick leave benefit category by allowing employees to accumulate an additional Va day of sick leave and an additional Iii day of vacation when they've accumulated 100 days of unused sick leave. Currently, the membership is not allowed to accumulate any more than 100 sick days total. 6. A 2.6% salary increase April 1, 1996; a 2.6% salary increase October 1, 1996; and a 2.676 increase April 1, 1997. 6. Add a section that would require the City to pay 7 hours of straight time per week when an employee is assigned to standby duty. In addition, if the standby week included a holiday, the employee would be compensated an additional 44 hour for each holiday. Council Agenda - 4/22/96 Prior to the initial negotiation session, I had responded to the union's request and basically indicated that the City was not interested in considering any changes to the current contract language for overtime pay or work schedule changes. Likewise, the City was also not interested in creating a new standby duty pay category that would obligate the City to additional hourly compensation for simply having an employee on standby rotation. In regard to the salary percentage increases proposed, I had responded by offering a 2.5% increase effective April 1, 1996, and continuing with the same contract language that indicated the second year of the contract would be increased by 1.6'% or by a percentage rate that is equal to the amount granted by the City to all non-union employee wage scales for the year 1997, whichever is greater. The initial meeting with the union representatives and City personnel basically reviewed each side's positions and requests, with the union representatives indicating they would take the City's position back to the full membership for discussion. A short time later, 1 received a revised proposal from the union membership that had requested the following items for consideration in the new contract. 1. A change in the work schedule section that indicated a normal work day was 8 matiauoye hours. In addition, they requested for the months of June, July, and August that the normal work day be 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 2. A request that all hours worked on a Saturday be paid at time - and -a -half, and all Sunday and holiday hours be compensated at 2 times the regular base rate, regardless of the number of hours worked by the employee during the week. 3. A change in the severence pay section that would allow an employee who retires from City employment the option of converting 100% of their unused sick leave accrual to o bank to be used to pay for their health insurance premiums until they were eligible for medicare. 4. A salary increase of 2.7'% effective April 1, 1996; a 3.3'% increase or an increase by a percentage rate that was equal to the amount granted to non-union employees in 1997 to be effective April 1, 1997; and a 3,6'% increase or an increase at a Council Agenda - 4/22196 percentage rate that is equal to the amount granted to all other non-union employees for the year 1998, whichever is greater, effective April 1, 1998. Creation of a new section called "Emergency Response Time" that would read that residency of an employee was not required in the city limits and that a sewer and water department employee could live within 21; miles of the shop rather than our present policy of requiring those individuals to be within 10 miles. After the first negotiating session, I felt we were fairly close to arriving at a contract agreement; but the second revised proposals submitted by the union covered additional areas that were not discussed during the original session. Again, I responded in writing to their proposals and outlined my position as follows: City would agree to a 2.7% increase effective April 1, 1996, and the same language for additional years that would indicate a 1.6'% increase in the wage scales or the same percentage that was granted to all other non-union employees, whichever is greater. This could be effective for any number of years that they wanted the contract to be extended. The normal work day for an employee would be 8 hours, although the employer has to retain the authority to limit the work day to 8 hours, including any callback hours, and that 8 continuous hours is not guaranteed. In addition, for the summer months, the City would be agreeable to a trial basis of 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. provided the union was agreeable to changing the provision for compensation on callbacks whereby all callback hours would be compensated at time actually worked rather than guaranteeing a minimum of 2 hours pay for any callback. City would be agreeable to the soverenco pay idea of converting unused sick leave at retirement for the purpose of continuing health insurance premiums, but only up to the present 60% maximum contribution level. Council Agenda - 4122/96 4. City would also be agreeable to increasing the vacation, sick leave, and holiday pay benefits for the groundskeeper position to the normal level provided all other union employees. After two more brief negotiating sessions, we arrived at a tentative agreement that is being presented tonight that proposes the following changes in the contract language: Sections 19.01, 20.01, and 21.01 relating to the groundskeeper/ maintenance worker's benefits would be increased from the present 75% of the union benefits to 100% for all three categories. This is consistent with normal policy in that the groundskeeper position has been working 40 -hour weeks, and it appears reasonable to also adjust the benefit levels accordingly. 2. Wages for the union membership would increase 2.7% effective 4/1!96 as follows: Top rate $16.22 42-54 months 14.61 30.42 months 14.00 18-30 months 13.39 06.18 months 12.79 1st 6 months 12.18 Top rate $ 8.24 42-54 months 7.91 30-42 months 7.67 18.30 months 7.24 06.18 months 6.91 let 6 months 6.69 In addition, the City of Monticello agrees to adjust the operator/mechanic and groundskeeper/maintenance classification salary schedule on 4/1/97 by an additional 1.6'x, or by a percentago rate that is equal to the amount granted by the City to all non-union employees for wage scales for the year 1997, whichever is greater. 19 Council Agenda - 4/22/96 These would be the only two actual contract language changes as part of the new agreement, although there would be two additional memorandums of understanding that we both agreed to but are not actually part of the contract document. They are as follows: A general agreement that on a trial basis, the City would try changing the work schedule from 7:30 to 4:30 p.m. with an hour lunch to 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. with a half hour lunch effective June, July, and August, 1996. This change in the work day would be an option the union membership could consider, and it's understood that any change would be on a trial basis only, with the City retaining sole authority to revert to the 7:30 to 4:30 time frame. The second memorandum of understanding concerns the accumulation of sick days and the use of these unused sick days as severence benefits upon retirement. From the City's standpoint, there appears to be some reasonable benefit for the City to investigate further the idea of possibly changing the amount of days that can be accumulated for sick leave and/or a change in the amount of unused sick leave that could be applied toward future health insurance premiums upon retirement. The idea as discussed by the union representatives and City negotiators concerned the incentives that this benefit could provide to an employee to possibly retire earlier than normal would also be a benefit to the City in that we would likely replace a retiring employee with a lower -paid individual, at least during the initial years of employment. The memorandum basically states that it is anticipated the City Council will address the issue for all City employees and that any decision would be retroactive to April 1, 1996, for the union membership, if changes are approved. As a result, it appears we have an agreement that is now ready for ratification by the City Council. The first alternative would be to ratify and execute a now 2 -year contract with the changes outlined above that result in a salary increase of 2.7% the first year of the contract and a minimum of 1.6% the second year of the contract. 20 Council Agenda - 4/22/96 In addition, the only other language change would grant 100'% vacation, sick leave, and holiday pay benefits to the groundakeeper position, along with the two memorandums of understanding that would be technically approved as part of the contract settlement. The second alternative would be not to ratify the contract as negotiated and request continued negotiations. V S7' FF F .O F.NDATION: It is the recommendation of Council representative Clint Herbst and myself that the Council approve the new contract as proposed. After reviewing and discussing all of the proposals on both sides, we've basically narrowed the entire issue down to wages, which is in tine with the same percentages granted to other non-union employees. As far as the memorandums are concerned, work schedule changes will be on a trial basis for this summer only, and the other issue regarding severence pay is a potential win/win situation for both sides in the future. As a result, there should be no reason for not supporting the new proposed agreement. Two memorandums of understanding Due to the length of the actual document, I have only included the specific language changes outlined in the agenda and the proposed salary schedules for the operator/mechanic and groundskeeper positions. If anyone would like a copy of the full contract, one is available at city hall for your review. 21 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING TRIAL PERIOD FOR SUMMER HOURS WORK SCHEDULE REVISION (Section 9.02) As part of the labor agreement for the period April 1, 1996, to April 1, 1998, the City of Monticello and the International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 49 jointly agree to establish, on a trial basis, a normal work schedule day of 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. for the months of June, July, and August 1996. It is jointly understood that this revised work schedule would allow for a one-half (1/2) hour lunch period. It is also understood the City of Monticello has the sole authority to terminate, revise, or modify the summer work hours as necessary to meet public service needs. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS CITY OF MONTICELLO LOCAL NO. 49 City Administrator Authorized Signature Dated: April _, 1996. FAMMIMURWIII: vivoa Iy4 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING CONTINUED DISCUSSIONS ON POSSIBLE SEVERENCE PAY MODIFICATIONS (Section 22.01) As part of the negotiated labor agreement for the period April 1, 1996, to April 1, 1998, the City of Monticello and the International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 49 mutually acknowledge that the City of Monticello will be considering possible amendments to the severenoe pay provisions that would allow all City employees to utilize at least 50% of the accumulated sick leave benefits toward continuation of health insurance premiums by the employer upon retirement. It is understood that further discussions will occur on the feasibility of establishing a formula that may enhance the number of days that can be accumulated and/or percentage of accumulated sick leave that could be used toward continued health insurance costs. It is also mutually agreed that any modifications to the soverence benefit would be applied retroactive for Local No. 49 employees to April 1, 1996. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS CITY OF MONTICELLO LOCAL NO. 49 City Administrator Authorized Signature Dated: April _, 1996. asvERENcswua; WITH / 4 V Council Agenda - 4/22/96 As you may recall, in January of 1995, the City Council approved a conditional use permit to allow development of a 48 -unit three-story senior housing project (Mississippi Shores). As a condition of the approval, condition #9 stated "An air filtration system will be developed that will serve common areas within the building and will serve individual apartments meeting design requirements of the City Engineer." Mississippi Shores Building Commitee is requesting that the City Council consider whether or not this staged plan meets the requirement as outlined in the conditional use permit. On Thursday, April 18, 1996, George Bloom, an engineer from OSM evaluating the Mississippi Shores odor control system, the Building Official, Gary Anderson, and myself inspected the odor control system installed at the project. Contrary to what we had been led to believe, we found carbon filters had been installed to service both the outside air supply and the return air for the three heating units that service the common areas in the building. In addition, standard quality residential type prefilters were installed ahead of the carbon filters. This system appears to be acceptable for scrubbing the common areas, although we would recommend a higher quality prefilter to protect the carbon filters, and there is some additional sealing and gasketing of duct work and doors to keep odors from getting into the common areas through the garage area, boiler room area, and the combustion air intakes in the upper furnace rooms. The individual room window air conditioner units were to have no controls to allow outside fresh air to be circulated through the air conditioner. If the inside air conditioner cover is removed, there is a control to let outside air to enter through the air conditioner. This control should be removed so as not to allow fresh air to enter the building through the air conditioner. The garage area below is not protected from odors entering that area. Assuming that the currently -installed odor control system is tightened up, and the certified balancing of the system does show a pressurization of the common areas, and some type of maintenance program is written up for the building maintenance personnel, this system is acceptable. Each of the individual living units, however, do not have adequate odor scrubbing systems. A tiny charcoal filter and the non -vented kitchen hoods will not scrub odors from the living unite. Once odors enter the living units, they will remain there until the odors outside the building have dissipated and the windows can be opened. George Bloom of OSM has, therefore, recommended that individual table -top or ftoe-standing air cleaners be purchased for each of the units. We would expect these table -top or fitee-standing units to have a 200 CFM scrubbing capacity, and there ate many outlets at which to purchase these. The Mississippi Shores Building Committee has asked that 22 Council Agenda - 4/22/96 they be allowed to purchase only two of these units, one for a two bedroom and one for a single bedroom unit, and purchase additional units or obtain them only upon complaints from individual residents. They have not indicated what the delivery time of additional units would be or whether or not the funds would be set aside for the purchase of those air cleaners. B. ALTFRNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to accept phased plans as meeting condition #9 of the conditional use permit. Under this alternative, City Council is comfortable that the proposed plan will meet the minimum requirements for air filtration, and the action plan for solving a problem, should one occur, is sufficient to meet the minimum requirements as outlined in the conditional use permit; therefore, the staged plan is consistent with the conditional use permit requirement. 2. Motion to deny the staged odor control plan. Under this alternative, the City Council could take the view that the staged plan for controlling the odors is insufficient. It could be argued that the two free-standing room air cleaners are not sufficient. A larger inventory of air room cleaners will be needed to purify air in a timely manner; therefore, the staged plan is not consistent with the conditional use permit requirement. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: MENDATION: The City Administrator, Assistant Administrator, Public Works Director, and Building Official are concerned about the staged approach to the odor control required by the conditional use permit for Mississippi Shores. If the staged approach is selected by the City Council, it must be clear that there is a high degree of likelihood that odors will be produced at the wastewater treatment plant over the upcoming construction period at the plant which the City and PSG will not have control over. If the odors find their way into the nearby Mississippi Shores living units, they cannot be dissipated by the existing system until the odors subside. Presbyterian Homes, as owner of the building, would be responsible to see that the individual room air cleaners were purchased and installed quickly upon receipt of a complaint from the individual tenants. City Staff is uncomfortable with recommending the staged approach to the odor control system for Mississippi Shores. D SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of letter fiom the City Engineer and Project Manager regarding the topic; Copy of Council minutes from January 1996. I'4Ya-1•!-1 Bl� 10:1.9 Qj;)1 'jVt t_ui in- �� atm CQ NO Part Puss ran .Or 6113 w*uw ew1cvw Valnelp" Mur 58411►lutl Ila sv53rs Much 14, 1996 Nor. -'04776 rAx5964173 tneneare AfOMM P11"C" surv"M Mr. John Simila Public Works Director City of Monticello P. 0. Box 1147 Monticello, MN S5362 Re: Mississippi Shores Senior Rousing OSM Protea No. 4960.4, Dear Mr. Simile: We have reviewed the information in a letter from CMA Construction, dated Mach 4, 1996, which includes additional information on the proposal for an odor control system. ?he General Electric non -vented hood, model JN332V proposed for the unit kitchens does not show the au quantity of the fan. In a telephone conversation on March 13, 1996, Dan Sand noted that he was unable to obtain the air quantity Bram GE customer service personnel and that he was going to investigato one of the fans that he has on site to sat if information is enclosed with the unit. He noted that if this information was not available from the manufacturer, he would have a contractor measure the air flow of the hood The following review Is based upon the assumption (estimate) that this fan produces ISO cf n of air which is recirculated through a charcoal filter. We have assumed a hypothetical outdoor condition of very low wind velocities and odor from the treatment plant surrounding the building for a period of 24 Aorta. For our hypothetical review we assumed that this odor is present only during thew condition& The probable scenario is that odors surrounding the building for an extended period of time will eventually inNtraw to the building Interior. During the period when these odors are surrounding the building, use of the toilet exhaust systems wil! reduce the positive pressure within the building and possibly allow more outdoor edoas to infiltrate the building. Therefore. we based our living unit calculations on use or the kitchen unit hood odor removal system only. Utilising the above noted asrmptions a one bedroom living unit, kitchen hood (an will porrido 1.9 air changes per hour (reel ulatb the air within the unit every 30 minutas). A two bedroom living u.0 would have 1.3 car changes per hour (recirculate the air within Cie unit every all; aunutas). This kitcbea hood will actually be diluting the odors in the living unit and we do not believe that it will reduce the odors to an acceptable level at long as there are odors surrounding the building. .a• �.te.�w3r vrvr. / `rT 03 rsa.-14-IYyb Ludy IIEt bu4.L.6r1 PHYGle.M 812 50 5773 P.02 Mr. Jobn Simile March 14, 1996 Page 2 When the outdoor odors are eliminated. use of the Ititchen hood and an estimated 73 clla toilet exhaust wiI l provide three air changes (change the air every 20 minutes) in a an bedroom living unit and two air changes (change the air every 30 minutes) in a two bedroom living{ unit By utilizing both of these fags sad opening windows a small amount in the living units, we animate odors would be reduced to a reasonable level in approximately four hours. We recommend that the living unit kitchen hoods have a minimum au flow of 130 cfid This should be verified by the contractor. The recotm stodstioas In the March 4.1 M IeW regarding the activated carbon Alun for the alt handling system appears to meet the criteria fated in our loner of Febmary 27, 1996. We once aBsin caution that we believe under certain conditions, odors will eater dds building even though there are charcoal filters on the make-up air. Sinurely. ORR•SCJEIEJY•MAYERON dt AS LAiES, ENC. rge P. Bloom, P.P. Senior Aswtiate C: Pao J:%rALN%PV4MoM%9Mtty Isg TOTE- •.02 APR -05-19% M:59 f CN)k Orr &� b 300 Park Mace Fist T 5775 waynta Boulevard mmneapwb. MN 554161728 612-595-5775 1-000.753-5775 FAX 5965771 Engineers March 21, 1996 Arwtacta Kamm Surveyors Mr. John Simola Public Works Director City of Monticello P. O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Mississippi Shores Senior Housing OSM Project No. 4960.44 Dear Mr. Simola: Per our telephone conversation of Much 19, 1996, we are herein enclosing our review of portable air treatment units which may be used for reducing odors in the living units. A typical portable air treatment unit contains a prefilter, electrostatic filter and carbon filter. Typical maximum air flow on these units is 230 cfm. Their design, intent is to clean dust. polleu and smoke particles from the aur, utilizing the electrostatic filter, and also assist in alleviating odors, by utilizing the charcoal filter. It appears that under notarial usage, carbon filter life expectancy is approximately three to four months. Combining a non -vented kitchen hood with a charcoal filter at a capacity of 130 cfm with a portable air treatment unit with a capacity of 200 cfm would provide approximately 4.3 air changes per hour (recirculate the air within the unit every 13 minutes) in a one bedroom living unit. A two bedroom living unit with the same air now would Have 3.0 air changes per hour (recirculate the air within the unit every 20 minutes). We believe a one bedroom living unit containing a portable air treatment unit with a capacity of 200 cfrn, combined with a 150 cfm kitchen hood, would provide a;reawnable reduction of odors within the living unit. We recommend the two bedroom living units have two portable air treatmcnt uoi:s which will provide approximately 4.7 air chan&s per hour. These filtering systems can purge all of the outdoor odor within the living units,only if infiltration of odor is stopped. If odors continue to enter the living units, the air treatment unit and kitchen hood will dilute the odor within the living unit and in most instances we believe to a level acceptable for most occupants. U" 4antw" MIM" / Su ri�K-JS-ly'� tJo� .o Mr. John Simola March 21, 1996 Page 2 As previously noud, all of the actions taken will help reduce odors within the living units, but will not eliminata all odor unless odor is not present in the outdoor air. Sincerely, ORR-SCIELEN-MAYERON 6t AS I OCIATES, INC.. rge P. Hloom, P.E. Senior Associate e: File i:%2-h14pbUGUcr0% J2Djs y �sD TOTAL P.02 Council Minutes - 1/9/95 8. Consideration of conditional use permit allowing the development of a 48 - unit. 3 -story senior housing proiect (Mississinpi Shores). Aonlicant. Monticello Senior Housing Alliance. AND Consideration of a conditional use permit allowing development of a joint parking facility shared by Monticello-Bia Lake Communitv Hospital District and the proposed senior housing facility. Applicant. Monticello Hospital District/Monticello Senior Housing Alliance (Mississippi Shores). Councilmember Anderson stated that Council had received a letter from the City Attorney just prior to the meeting regarding a conflict of interest due to her and Councilmember Herbst's positions as Councilmembers and members of the Monticello Senior Housing Alliance. Since items on the agenda for tonight's meeting relate to the proposed senior housing facility, Anderson asked if they are required to resign from one of the positions immediately tonight. Administrator Wolfsteller reported that since the items for consideration tonight pertain to conditional use permits (not considered contracts by statute), preparation of plans and specifications for moving a sewer line, and only calling for a public hearing on a bond issue, it shouldn't be a conflict of interest at this time; however, in the future when Council votes on approval of tax increment financing or issuing bonds, it is the City Attorney's opinion that a conflict would exist since these actions would be considered contracts between the City Council and the Senior Housing Alliance. Wolfsteller noted that Councilmembers Andersun and Herbst will need to decide which committee they wish to remain on by the next Council meeting; however, once the contracts are entered between the Council and the Senior Housing Alliance, a conflict would no longer exist, and Anderson and Herbst could once again join the Senior Housing Alliance. Assistant Administrator O'Neill then reviewed the conditional use requests to allow development of a 48 -unit, 3 -story senior housing project and to allow a parking facility and drive access shared by the Monticello -Big Lake Community Hospital District and the proposed senior housing facility. The 2 -acre site is located directly east of the existing clinic facility and encompasses two platted lots and an unvacated portion of the River Street right-of-way. To the north of the site is the River Street right-of-way, which was platted many years ago but never developed for roadway purposes; to the south is Hart Boulevard and Highway 75; and to the east of the site is a home formerly owned by Joe Soltus and recently purchased by John Bondhus. Farther to tho oast is the Bondhus office complex and the wastewater treatment plant. He noted that the site meets ordinance requirements with regard to street access design and location. Page 3 15-5- Council Minutes - 1/9/95 -wow— ONeill went on to report that the presence of the wastewater treatment I plant and periodic odors that impact the area represent some potential for incompatibility between uses; however, it was the consensus of the HFLA, the Hospital Board of Directors, the Senior Housing Alliance, and the Planning Commission that the odor problem is linked to fairly unique atmospheric conditions that occur only a few days per year. In an effort to manage potential problems, it is proposed that the air intake system be designed to include an air filtration mechanism that will filter air entering hallways and general use areas of the building. In addition, the individual wall air conditioners serving each apartment unit will also have an air filtration system installed. O'Neill also reported that the site plan exceeds parking requirements for senior housing. Under the plan as proposed, the site will contain 18 parking spaces in front of the building and an additional 33 spaces underground for a total of 51 spaces, which is 3 spaces in excess of the parking minimum. He also noted that any future conversion of the site from senior housing to multi -family would require City permission via the conditional use permit process and development of an additional 45 parking stalls, 12 of which would need to be enclosed. O'Neill continued by reviewing the ordinance requirements for development of a 3 -story senior housing facility as follows. In his review, ONeill noted that condition A2 may be a discriminatory Wile that would be unenforceable. 1. Not more than 10% of the occupants may be persons 60 years of age or under (spouses of a person over 60 years of age or caretakers, etc.). 2. Except for caretaker unite, occupancy shall be limited to man and wife, blood relatives, or a single man or single woman. 3. To continuo to qualify for the senior citizen housing classification, the owner or agent shall annually file with the City Administrator or Building Inspector a certified copy of a monthly resume of occupants of such a multiple dwelling, listing the number of tenants by age and clearly identifying and setting forum the relationship of occupants 60 years of age or under to qualified tenants or to the building. 4. Installation of one off-street loading space in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 6. ` 5. Elevator service is provided to each floor level. I6. Usable open space as defined in Chxapter 2, Section 2, at a minimum, is equal to 20% of the gross lot arena, Page 4 1 J Council Minutes - 1/9/95 7. The site of the main entrance of the principal use is served or is ` I located within 400 ft of regular transit service. 8. The site of the main entrance of the principal use is within 400 ft of commercial shopping development or adequate provision for access to such facilities is provided. O'Neill also noted three additional conditions that Council may want to add to the conditional use permit as follows: 9. An air filtration system will be developed that will serve common areas within the building and will serve individual apartments meeting the design requirements of the City Engineer. 10. Review and approval of the grading plan by the City Engineer. 11. Review and approval of the fire protection system by the Fire Marshall and Monticello Fire Department. Councilmember Anderson noted that perhaps language should be included in the contract to indicate that installation of an air filtration system sufficient to handle the occasional wastewater treatment plant odors is the responsibility of the Senior Housing Alliance and not the City of Monticello. Mayor Fyle noted his concern regarding limited access by emergency vehicles to the rear of the building. He noted that the fire department's ladder truck could reach any window in the proposed 3 -story complex provided a drive access is available to all windows. Fyle suggested that the question of whether to hard surface a drive access to the rear of the building be discussed by the fire marshall and fire department. Site designer, Jay Nelson of BRW, responded that the plan could be modified to allow for a drive access around the building. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING DEVELOPMENT OF A 3 -STORY SENIOR HOUSING FACILITY CONTINGENT ON THE CONDITIONS LISTED ABOVE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF CONDITION N2, WHICH WILL BE WAIVED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Motion is based on the finding that development of the facility at the proposed location is consistent with the geography and character of the area, consistent with the comprehensive plan, will not result in depreciation of property values, and there is a demonstrated need for the use. Page 6 /S G Council Minutes - 1W5 In discussing the conditional use permit for a joint parking facility, Council noted that they would like a stipulation that the underground parking be used only for vehicle parking and not storage of other items. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING DEVELOPMENT OF A JOINT PARKING FACILITY SHARED BY MONTICELLO-BIG LAKE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DISTRICT AND THE PROPOSED SENIOR HOUSING FACILITY WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE UNDERGROUND PARKING AREA IS TO BE USED FOR VEHICLE PARKING ONLY AND NOT STORAGE OF OTHER ITEMS AND SUBJECT TO PREPARATION OF A PROPERLY DRAWN LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXECUTED BY THE ]HOSPITAL DISTRICT AND SENIOR HOUSING ALLIANCE DEFDTING TERMS FOR JOINT USE OF THE OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES, APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND FILED WITH THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR AND RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER. Motion carried unanimously. Council Agenda - 4/22/96 16. Consideration of authorizing purchase of new street sweeper under state contract. O.S. ) As Public Works Director, I made a recommendation to the City Council on April 9, 1979, to purchase an Elgin* Pelicane Series Street S*eeper with a diesel engine from MacQueen Equipment for $42,990. The bid was based upon a piece of equipment that MacQueen Equipment had in stock and was available for immediate delivery. The City of Becker was interested in our old 1964 mobile sweeper, and consequently, it was sold to the City of Becker for $1,700. We have had few problems with the sweeper over the past 17 years. The engine and hydrostatic drive unit are pretty much original and only routine maintenance has been needed. The main wheel drive chains and sprockets have been changed every 6 or 7 years and are due again. The parts alone will be $2,000 to $3,000. The paint on the sweeper is still quite good, as we have repainted it once since we purchased it. In looking into the possible purchase of new sweeper, we have looked at other models and manufacturers besides the Elgin* Pelican* Series; but since the Elgin' has performed so well for the City of Monticello and for many other communities, we felt that this would again be the machine for the City. A couple of drawbacks for the sweeper aro 1) the air filtration system in the cab, and 2) it is only a right-hand drive in that it has only a single gutter broom. When sweeping medians such as the one on Broadway, we have to go against the flow of traffic, and this requires additional personnel for signing and safety reasons. The dual drive machine, which has a gutter broom on both the left and right and steering on both sides, could go with the flow of traffic and reduce the manpower needed to sweep the center island streets. In addition, public works personnel have looked into the possibility of switching the chain drive on the wheels to the new total hydraulic drive thnCs available. In preparation for this, we have placed an amount of $75,000 in the 1996 budget. This, along with an estimated trade value of $20,000 for our current sweeper, would make $95,000 available for purchase. no City of Rockford has expressed an interest in our sweeper. We have informed them that the sale price is $20,000 as -is, and they would have to make the necessary drive chain and sprocket repairs. MacQueen Equipment has given us a preliminary trade-in value of $15,000 should we wish to trade it in on the Council Agenda - 4/22/96 state contract purchase. They are, however, going to make an additional inspection of the sweeper to see if they could offer us slightly more on a trade-in. At this time, it appears very likely that the City of Rockford would purchase our sweeper. I should have more information on this for Monday evenings meeting. The price of an all -hydraulic unit speed out the way the public works department would like it is $95,052.83. Based upon our receiving $20,000 from the City of Rockford for our old machine, this would make the total expenditure $75,052.83; this includes all freight and taxes. This would be $62.83 over our proposed budget for 1996. The first alternative is to authorize purchase of an all -hydraulic Elgin® Pelican* Series P Three -Wheel Broom Sweeper on the state bid for a total amount of $95,052.83, including sales tax and freight. The second alternative would be to advertise for bids. We believe this would result in a higher price than currently available through the state contract. The state contracts are based upon a 1995 price, which was extended for two years on the Elgin* Series. The third alternative would be to rebuild our current unit and oentinue using it even though it is 17 years old. C. STAFF F. ,O MF.NDATIGN: It is tho recommendation of the City Administrator, Public Works Director, Street & Parka Superintendent, and the Operator Mechanics of the public works department to purchase the Elgin* Pelican* Series P all -hydraulic unit as speed out through the state contract as outlined in alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of brochure on the Elgin* Pelican* Series P; Copy of quote from MacQueen Equipment on the state bid for an all -hydraulic unit. 25 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. QUOTE f 1960406 595 ALDINE ST. ST. PAUL MN, 55104 QUOTE DATE:04/17/96 612-645-5726 WATS 1-800-832-6417 ORDER: FAX 612-645-6668 ORDER DATE: f CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY OF MONTICELL40 P.O. BOX 1147 PO BOX 1147 SHIP TO: MONTICELLO MN 55362 MONTICELLO MN 55362 TERMS: NET 30 Customer P.O.: SALES REP.:MC CARTHY, BILL Customer Phone: 612-295-2711 QTY. DESCRIPTION EACH EXTENDED PRICE ............................................................................................... 1 •ELGIN PELICAN SE DUAL HYDRO 89,743.00 89,743.00 1 •FREIGHT 500.00 500.00 STATE BID PURCHASE ORDER 0 C-79094-03001-01 PACKAGE TO INCLUDE: A/C HEATER AND DEFROST HYDRAULIC MAIN BROOM SUSPENSION SPRUNG GUIDE WHEEL DELUX SEATS CLEARANCE LIGHTS J REAR FLDOD i BACK UP LIGHTS BROOMS OPTIONS: DEDUCT FOR P SEARIES DUAL ADD FOR LOWER ROLLER WASH OUT ADD FOR TURBO II PRE -CLEAN ADD FOR STROBE LIGHT ADD FOR LIMB GAURD ADD FOR ENGINE SHUT -DOWN ADD FOR REAR SLIDING WINDOW EXAMPLE: TOTAL FOR DUAL P -$3,348.00 88 !,Oka 300.00 �. d 3 V p ^op 4a 295.00 W AreN �An1K 390.00 a8 i 18? - 105.00 5 i t o• 83 -r'°" f 157.00 g w,s seas see, 392 00 5 cc �R�1b^ � ............................................................................................. o . P BUB.TOT. 90,243.00 Lo CUSTOMER GELLER reserve the right to change prices without notice. The price in effect at time of delivery �. .1 prevail, notwithstanding the prices shown herein. Dales tax and F.E.T. are not included in above pricing. Applicable sales tax and P.E.T will be added, unless tax exemption eertifi- Cato is provided. in 1914, Elgin Sweeper Company introduced the world's first three - wheel broom sweeper. Since that day, Elgin three -wheel broom sweepers have set the industry standard for innovation in design and engineering. This tradition of excellence continues today in the Pelican' Series P broom sweeper. The Pelican" Series P picks up what competitive sweepers leave behind, like bottles, bricks and other large debris. The powerful hydraulic side brooms grab hold of heavy gutter debris and feed it to the hydraulic main broom. The main broom moves the debris on to the No -Jam'" convey- or belt which dumps into a large capacity hopper. The Pelican' P's high maneuverability allows the operator to move around parked cars and other obstacles with ease. An effective water spray system suppresses dust. And the front - mounted hopper allows dumping in Just a single lane of traffic. It's performance standards like these that make the Elgin Pelican' the most popular three -wheel broom sweeper in the world. A •3Gi3p � gn p O_G 3I �ac€cE SERUM =gg_ [r] u 0 .1 4ZP L M Black Satin Underbody Powerful Sweep System and Graphic Stripes • HVWDO zl:y-Onion man bropn onMM pr. optow on the Poliew' Sono v condom hign torauo 1W MCpptOMl Magna ona mm mum mantonanco • Twin anvo pnp aM aQu0016•Coaar don gn on main txoom dwWly CouWW MyorauYt powp ra:abb DCtoo • Ny01raLL'fCACytlrrvpn prop Droorrlp havo m broor mora tlrggmg power for Meavy W I comp=oa a,n Efficient Cab Design • Large'w.noow a" door glass areas xcm,'ce greater sioday ana aaaea safe[, • 4 Duooleincow ,n each coor rec"C _-g glare amp Pro aes a closer looi,. at ont woom performance aha gun guitar conprtions l • Urge cap Coors mace operator access ease, ana Tore con,ertrr;nt • TioteC wma",M am tui-Drotecnon —�• Sun v15prs are vanaara Corrosion -Resistant Water System • -v o d � .a.m� n. ^ •nr tai I•r �� .� rate :ana •� • � u•1^ .a ar.,lntV . a,.., . , l ,l on,.,l aa•,r ru�•�n Dependable Hydraulic System • Fewer hydraulic hoses ana a new tandem pump aesigh that ebmmawn pelt orwes • The suction ano return start or time arae system aro aberec, tsolatng :n or ,e system bort[ rhe sweep sysler, • Sweep system hyaramic valves anc !row convoas are convenienay locelec 'or easv servicing Maneuverable Three - Wheel Design • The Pelican• Series P .s the lop droitt, la closo-m otv swe.oing arouna parked cars. Opst.cles .Ina ugnI cul-ao-sacs • Tho aual•bre gU40 wheel gw.s the Pelican' P oado sfanrhty a w,Cp trach am inc,easoo st—ing I,acnon Heavy -Duty Conveyor Belt • Eigm o NO -Jam- aeagn al au nm -.top t1pu01e.11" on.1a • The Curable, mulllplo INV. relmorco0 ruOlaw convoVor Wit n.a fullwialh molbca C Cato that can hanalo largo ocotm mor..necLvaq' than high mamtonanco o0uom .quo .yzlos • Boll rnavement can b0 revartoo without mv—no the boom. 1� The Front Dump Advantage An integral part of the Pelican' design is the front -mounted hopper. Dumping can be accomplished in a single lane of traffic. The su perior front -lift design has a longer reach and lower clearance than competitive rear -dump sweepers. In addition, all dump functions are controlled from the cab and are visible from the operator's position. Front dumping will not spill water or debris on engine components. Dump height is variable from the ground to 9'6" allowing up to dump truck -height dumping. Four -Way Side Broom Movement �9 Sweeping effectiveness is 4nhanced by the four-way movo- ment of the side brooms. The Pelican's' side brooms move up and down, and side to side for increased periormance around obstacles with less damage to the brooms. The brooms also maintain pattern setting regard- less of up and down motion, 3600 View From Cab Increased visibility provides added safety and increased sweeping performance in the Pelican' P. The 360° view fea- tures a sliding bubble window for additional operator visibility of sweeping at the curb. Easy Cleanup with Built -In Washdown A built-in washdown system makes clean-up quick and easy. Connect the fill hose to any fire hydrant, activate the conveyor and the flushing action will automatically clean the system. PELICAN® SERIES P 3 -wheel broom sweeper specifications GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS: Whoel bM - 127.4 h. rim r 4 Gored length - 15 n. 10 h. (4M mm) �y Height - 91L 12743 rmd W WN MUD" tel - 9 R e In. (2590 mm n—mg mch u awrepirtg - 15 R (4572 rteml Swop path Orr side broom - 81L 124M mea Two side brooms - 10 R (704a mmol Empty W4I0K: Om side t mm - 1 &590 ba (6170 Rol) TWO Ode 10 001119 - 14.290 RW MUS k9) Travel Speed - WP to 20 mph (32 knew) CHASSIS (BODY): Type • Waltzed, tabrpRad rw Welded Irwy SbM plate.. thb— rot do, 7 ging. Tow hoot • Tlao tram. two rw CAB: Type - Full, 14-g.W steel Doors - S0►deu with eO&V bubble WIIW- OPonup • From = bot probadom . Rubber om' sealed Whdors • 50" 9YM Well ttrtled WhdeWeld and padded sun v10om ow 0000 SM h. (2.96 w -.labra alta, 380 daRa Mrdby WbwRURd wtlpaa - 2 .Peal with woohm Mho$ - Irulds (1): owrde, due weld Gast with Canrsa herb and fA 1-"' W -"'and Seat(.)- Dewm e toaCuaNat with battle) Souw swpaalon • Tlretr coves, Cab ceaoh0. Newr.d, alto wwo compdrbrned RIgM rho IRt — vbae INSTRUMENTS: panel - FW Wap., Hurawed Galr94s • Bpaedonrlar/odonrtr, taaltamrtY, awh. a, v moto..wl, bmpllo od a ampe,v Noland tori hydrauM a frrperalue end rata to r ENGINE DippDope 4079T 4 Cyton. (392 W S ppearrrm • 2719 cu M. p.92 U Spoke • 4,77 h. 1220 bona ams . 4.18 h. (106.47 mm) HbrSep' • 110(82 did) a 2500 RPM Torque - 270 Lt F1(066 " O 1600 RPM Ar CW" -Due peaty .Irhpd dry lye. with 11c r0orlotlon Yndlcator 00 tator - Ful no. cpnmrboloced Wel 9eele CodeV tea+. bapabb 20ass OPTIONAL ENGINE (Califomin cortiflod): Curn rum 4 OT 3.9 4 CY10101F dieael Diaplpepnwu - 238 tut. in. (0.92 W Homq,ow - 105 NP p91Mq O 25M IPM Tmquro - 200 Lb -Fl (634 mw O 1700 RPM All clo— • Due palm OW -M on, typo with bKr mamcdon w4wwo, o0 nip • run no., tout on typo FUEL SYSTEM: TTaIacapodly• 73 ge (1725 V e Talocation • &tri oparapb W Wallanee Tw* wmWnlon - SIM Pure • aapnrogm typo PAINT. polylMOlhrt. ppmsl h speed WNW, For, Shp comp consult factory. DRIVE SYSTEM: Nvwo=ma MWO- alo. co.aroeg a t onabb dmpbc~ Puny awe vampbM ah9lae.rhlrtt `b made mzwmalcally coro0g$d to Produce noised lmgle al a am prOOalA. Saye tae peas to, Mwa vMuon. coat" Widw ourch m aunro "uno. War11 opeeda nn00prndptl or reticle wo da"C"ea. Plprhaary gee from hums with Rerded quack dWxnnKto Wer towage ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: Hat stamped and color coded mvv Attp.atnr/requaor - 1A411zad. 105 mere Barmy - 12 colt. Oram 31. 923 CCA. 130 — asrve UWft • Sealed mumtoM beam headtlgMO, combi- ..flan Rap am aid wta, a *Web two brown V,U.L dhl owtai egiwa with hared errtttu Safety - Hum, alecmrl ip setae R.m1 Auto rMet Caarl 11.211— STEERING: Type - Full p— myd—tabo Wert moOw owmW WhW - IS in. ala (457 mm) TIRES: From - (A 11 R 22.3 14PA Ubslro radial Rear - (2) 9R 17.3 1Ism ebelas radial Swine - Ful pow. fly, anCfoOtl, bderrte e.prwag, ho -Ac whwlon W toot peam. 2021& e. (1303 ed. =4 Par" - Orachdi n land Mrw app9ed, dam type WHEELS: Fred - Steel dim type, S." . 22.8 Roar - Duet steel dbe type, mwded a 00ry at.* tub. 6.5 . 17.5 Pmtactlon - Skid oWN lardr nor. M Madre OvIa Jed Pod • adInCem to Min abrade whey CONVEYOR SYSTEM: Typo • Muaplo ph roempCed rubber Dell CMR& - Nur. t^t49rsb' matoed, lull vadth 441' SpWm - Fa wroth steel OMe - HMrmdlt g, mote. chain and aproceol dmve p. Won-Rode/.0.. Strum eat mad, • 00.711, HOPPER: Volumom CaPoclty - 3.5 cu. you (2.7 cu. era Matrw capocmy • 3 Cu you Ga au. ,M 0-0i.0 mrnoa • Ny0'MICrM too ould aro armed by a "'aw Mar D.m9ag h.gm - up to 9 O. 6 et. cm ^era 1Aaalmum claaprco arVa repined welt dump" Is n.144177 mm) Ma. roach • 33 h. ISM mem) lta p0lmh ottgpr•7It111n 072." Hoppe .with . 5 n. it 5N meq Waw COPWIV • Wall 60.140410 hp( Clump Cycle - 60 ace. MAIN BROOM: TyP4 - pwall PaMaaPONMI dkp0aas0. double wrapped a both mwp QW. MH. a. 60 ft W IMmm. 1127-m9 Ua -Shot. r—lubb aid. • w0cauuno motor Spapa - vurtPOe Carola • Ila can "&&Ab rola rw loWa app9rtabn • awwo vmk operabr lawdload SIDE BROOM: Too - Vrtlta diMp Dib." • 96 at, 191 ♦bop Local$- Camp of eWeepr b~ dma0 Whop$ wap - Nye.uaO mown Prptoctbn - wout Vocoa 012,101, Uydprm Ou.po.Oo. - PeaaWo hraoum PMMM*V Woh coring auamon baa Comb ft • Re.otg, lowrag, re poemarutw hydra w-cury hem Cum DaOr„rn •Four, dkPa.DM Fele - TwWood at" We WATER SPRAY SYSTEM: TW ca" - 1410 gal. (8411 L) Tub corw rwC w - POM6pwM Ptu p typo - UrmNptl. 5 GPM O 40 P81 Spray noaYs • Atomlbrg, AdO.M to 1aCh broom Filter kx=on - Fatorlor Mn Woe. .100 rtran. cl w ro—c - • I41 n e.s IsoeO mm1+wt 1lydiertl ntl rntbg.4th vadabb lbw carM*W nom mo WARRANTY: ON year Pru rw labor OPTWNL. Duel coropl • Req and Mn Rde brouea, 1013, acn lard aprelnr caob. roc aPr$ . tom 0~ rite for SweOplrg In die lo of teat^ Hyoraalc rrrh oorh euSpenlan - Saw SUSPrped, .4et board" POWer nrarele 1pealpwg. poealon vnmceor In Cab W anw po4tlon of main boom Amo-lube-.4omwlo 4hlruillat Syerm Epm thap, e.at" All condbor r FSM as n /a 2ZUrU*.. wan dohoSLr rw Cab dame NON SauV qed. w4eel ebin Beabm to Stipp. WO ADM" aO WWOb. 900 qurd Ercb+c a" broom poeden oalkaw ow" cola waethr Rat awe tr b go Addborw 40 00. (151 y weer tom E.trwed Tammy etldetp rally wabow aPaatnm a4d alel - wlna roma pae10 n I15A 1991 Elgin Swoopor Company 1900 West Bartlett Road P.O. Box 537 Elgin, IL 80121-0537 Ph: (708) 741.8370 Fou: (708) 742.3035 ENWIrry S056ary at Fodprol Signal Corporation P/N 0705155-A Effecillve 5/94 69'0 F-WAINC.141. $ r_rM 03-/1'a•/.76 t;S;?%:4'4' fai^•burn?mint .1'prtrn ' ,IRRAMi f)ATe VFNONk 11.ry4Ra1'V'I WItJ YitAlltlWI G1 (iftiEkAL CHECKING 4017.2 03/14/96 141E15EN/MA'1"T 46'1 tk"VGK VU71I)tV 13.Zoef Y 4eb13,2 03/'18,x'88 TIQEISPN/MA.r7 US7 CHt-CK •V011510 htl9. 1'Brx 1,�5,.41+c:a tri+ 40,13 03/1,8/:58 ttR3+3tiT ariOUN,rV 9ECQRO 2514 FAtifpfFN'r /CiaELL'U/'SGIipO ��.,Wu 40140 03/18/8. MN D1 PA{2T OF NAS l,k Al_ 11'6 WAnER/5MOW/ATV RETS 4,H i,. 00 VO 144, 93/18/96 0 0 UFNTER ,OF MTNNE3 ja1'.3' COMpU't P/FTR-E 1!£RT 2.,311.14 40114$ 03/1118f96 TURa11LA/G9VT .A042!l' k+k(INt?/I IT El. LTV PLV'tdY 1. 5;, 4'01-43 03/18/96 111GN CITY 1'014 `iL(00illk1LIC Wokk'S Mo "49.V" 40144 03)18/90 MN 811[LbSNU'UJ41CTAi. 7?4t klti f'6i/t1A'RY'AdOfR''ON I',.-lit 40149 04/18/00 41'ikl(&14NG .1'k/41FpHftJ 7):l ilf V'aMl/{llyliifq VAN 1.41M.SYl k1T9'46 01/tl1/ttlr +:Y!MM1Ur4'f1.A1SON Allolr(1 :n Y v.,,21AIA f IFAWTFr_,/4 I, 414 41114 1/(1/4&ji 0#vT11.NHUGi;A'VHY 'fb VTN1)Rb /F 1+1 ` i w/1'148 O ,/1njM4 I'UI tslJ 4:J:.(lr,,,V, C 'V q-,4 Vt:AfKrl• kJ`'!,/ dUa:.u1 40941' 1l )j1U/4'G f1'11Eay, A A';i'.UC.TNG N ,IA 1 ;'W't 190F bL'AV$ "t!r/lIk _'1,II.M1i1 :'11S.h11 R41' 4014•19 01.)/1.0/06 VW1l,,/OT'GV 1U'.10 941.lt-AIiE M4••t F111/[{'T P1"14V'AU •1b MI 401''.0 0:�Jttl/9G (,-wN4 .11"AUtt1 Gtird$T ftr!Q TNd V'!°f' > fF'tJ.GPgI l�ri N' 1?;).UU 40,51 n3/fC/Sib NQk 4AI '944 FN4 P(< 11/tWV'WW l'V:D44 1i yQlli'd 01)/10/09+ .11AIDW; f )>VAVA;TVJU 9 fO fWBT frlli,l G/.f; H111 !j l.'1ri t.t1N 40)53 08/19/90 RRAFMF41/WANT?A J'4U Mtl:fAi4E RF.MI/I71:14104P IfLflli 401'14 03)10/7G 'MM1 fICRT L)f B(Vf,wil, L' J1 WVARROU'� WA'Ult TAI( f Ik0_'Pl 4,0101} '03/'1'Fl/1)G NOWIRWI'l T !.1111 ramp Vl !•n Fe U. 14"0. 11 4(11',q fl')/9'4/`10 t40kTKWt-;T (h;NI', Y10 WO, pr/11' ^.iRVF1:: '/ul inn.iIIJ 111..1.11 4t 4UC',,, Na/t:at,''A, ailtl 111t4lldllyy lami,l1 tl'11rJ I:1,;n/)AQ",•t r 1i i V1;lf 41)11,1 111/1(1/71, «. N, 111)1 ItTF's to/Iw/'11, DtvrCI'1r1! .,rtv „1Aft tl,t, i ,. ,I •r.It, ".# u ,OC, FINANCIAL SVST�EM 09.191/86 t5;p2):4G CAkago, twit VEN[tOR GEHE�eAL TMEQ(iING, 4'U 1''59 0318/9.6 SCHL'UtNOER CON.STR.,U.CT 40180Ol/t9j88 'AFM"IF1LF LANb' 115E GO LU 161 03/(B/9L TU3 1,IJACOM 49rftl 0'i/141;(9B' rRS rELEl:OM 4U3U1 tld/18/A4. r0S tFl"t-with 40161 fti/10/u6 Ttiti TELtuUM AQllit 09/18/Ati lbIVt.tt'OM 41j1LA TDV T14k:0�1 4021.1 Ili/y8/9G T4 1.11, 1t. LFI,(&.. 4.0 16 1 tlI/A8/A6 TUS TELLCOM A0141 Oi/18/8t, IOSti T'Fttf,t/tr 4 011-6 1 0:1/18/96 TI9S I EL FL'OM 40 JA81 03/139%S'1, 7,13 1'1 I t-pu'm .4 (PI b:1 03/1&^6 TUS Tf{.t COM 40162 QJ'%lt►/AS TMF1'^FN/MATT, 40183 0 ,/1@}!80 TWT-S9"ATC, PUMP 6 CUM, �':U1b4 03/101,96 WOO PHRfECT GENERAL CHCCKING ui,"rsomO.mt .iotiilnal U'ktjCklPTi3ON AMUUN,T. UL' 118'T w,w7P kt0ll'Al/k-TLL HOLL 144.5D, (iiia R; l; F�Ef/.IfFF 0 rs.u) W%8 It LtLHUNt IH4k1,kS 34'ir,111L 4•,,4; TFl ;-VHUttt 'uH1AKf;r14 '+bi' ItLEWUNt L'H'ARJ-14. 14/.Yi,{t vtbt Tt11-F'HLINt NAk:4t>3 11+3.Ot' th'4 It L3ktfi4Nf CHAklAl, !01•'"[1 Mit 7tJ t:PttOVl- t.HA4t4r.f+ ','I. �o yh.1 Ifl I - pr tkt 1WAO;ts 's',.;47 PS rel FkHONF CHAkG1•ti 11fl.al tl h;y ft I h V11y,Nt (',4ARMfl) 1 '1-L F?Htjt11 C11AR4ik f4�t rILt.PHcltdt; ff1A$AA,F`1 H411.41I 'ihi Tt4FPI[ONt'GH!{kiVS II'V1.VN. 1 .A x,111 is. i"� *1.} 4Sf tkA* L 6uvt-NbE IY.4t WO 31.PI;W PALW:: oil Iftii.44 1A18 ,,IJIi5m-lPTlUN,/%lETJ4 a 24..u0 IIATA L 1'10,692'.6.19 c� ,SRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 'i.,A�'RAI�jT p'A7E V,ENOOk': GENERAL. CHECKING 40165 03'./2?/96 QNIVERSiT.Y OF MINNES 401,S6 •03/22/96"�."oRTMtRN $TATE S� POWE 4Q1"67 03/22./40 wERMERS/oAN1EL 49. f" 03/72/90 ARAMA'RK 40'1,+89 03/1- /96 COMPRESS AIR & 'EQUIP 401710 03./22/06 HOLIDAY CREDIT ''OFF'IC 4017'1 03/22/96 INTEROATI0NAL 500,TET NO 17.2 03/22/98 LANES/LY,NN NO173 03/,22/96, LITTLE FALLS MAC,HIN,E .40174. 014.f"198 MN OPPART OF T RAAISPO' 4017'.0. 03/2'2/90 M" SAFETY COUNC14 4'017$ 03/22/86 MN SURPLUS &' 0ULF'tTT 4,0117 0!%.2'2/96. R & 0 S'AOS, >t'NC. 46`1:10 03/24/,-96 ST. CLOUD TIMES 401,18 03/$2/96 STAR TRIBUNE 401,80 -03/22%86 'SUBURBAN MAH11F'ACTOkl 40181 03/22/00 WRIGHT C00TV gQRv1FY YIENERAL .CHEC.KI0' c D.isbulsem#nt:Journal O,ESCAIP.TION , AMOUNT 212 REG FEE/SHADE TREE F0 96.•00 148 SCHOOL 8LVD LIGHTING B4i.60 .90431 REIMS/HOME ,OCCUPATTCN, 16.000 846 CITY H'A'LL SOPPLIE-& fTS.5l1 356 FIRF'DEPt VEH' SUPPLIES 15.50 85 GAS/FIRE DEPT 61.01 01 LUNCH R•EIMB/S'FkXNAR 11.00 90430 RESMB/DAMAGE TO VFMIC1. 00,7.Q' 709 SANDER REPA'TR. PART{/ (,00$.00 536 ENG^ FEE'S%PA7HVAY ,031..45 488 'MEM'S'E"B IP oUB$/'AWAIR 12S..00 10" WORK CQ'AT/SLD INSPECTO 03.95 MOOS LOGO/SLD TOP JACKET, 0,. 00 349 BLD INSPECTOR HE -LP' AD 61e.00 197 SLD INSPECTOR HELP 1,749.0' 1021 fME "PT M'hG OF 6401' 29.3.53 034,) MAD•fi/p LAN & LUN 2.0.00 TOTAL 9,20U.10i 0C FINANCIAL $d'tTE'M }'A'RRA'NT DATE VENDOR' GENERAL Cl'1E0,106 "017'1 03/'2'8/96 If4TERNA7IW44L SOC I1:-1 40182 03/,26/98 MN. OEPARI 011 NATURAL 40183 01/28/96 s'COMPAq COMPUTER Cf)RP 44184 03jn796 MN DEPART OF NAT+JRAL 4010'5. 03/28196 LEAGUE OF 'MN r, VI es, 401QL5 63/28/95 LE4GUE OF MN CITIEfi 40185, 0 /213/06 LEAGUE OF MN CM, 401.05 03/28/96 LEAGUE OF MN CTT TES 40185 '03/20/96 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 40185 03/28/96 LEAGUE OF MN CITTE5 40105 481/28/90 LEAGUE Cil' MNC1TIIES 40105 08/20/96 LFAGt1G OF Mf1 rITIES 6.0185 '03/20/96 LvAG11E or; MN CITIES 40185 03/20%08 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 4'01-04 0J/20/00 L.EArlii. qt; V.N £`ITTE3 48103 02/20OON; LEAGUE (OF 'MN CITIES X011,5 0:1/2f1/00 LF:ARIIF OF MN Ct-TI£S �OIJS 03y d/0 LEAGUE O� ESN CITI££ .aiQr. 09/nmo I'EmiNf M MN .01TTFG 401 t)b 03/29/I)G L FARLIE 0V MN 'CITI G'S, 4!3111.4 U7/2n/9i'4 LEACMJ� OP f4t; ;:TltLY 4610!, (1T/.?Q%lJ0 LrARlf _ OF MN' CtTIF,,. (1FWVAt, CKPDXV* 04'shorgement journal CY@$C:AIflTT.ON' AM!)UN1 41 t:ttFCd1 v0'il' v V3;.AOCR 1111 aATL-R/ISNOa/ATV T&1- 10?; COMP11TrR/NEW WVTF 0 1,180.00 118 SNpyJ/wA,r `R/ATv REG 554.00 243 iNSURANCf PRF141iJM 1,083_00 2'43 1NSURA'NCE Pk'(Al11M 1SO.UU 243 1",'URANC'$ PRV4IU)A 664.100 243 INSURANCE P.REMIIIM 331.00 243 INWRAI CE PREMIUM' S,5P-01) 2:43 114SU.6iANCE PREMIU14 070.00 $43 L444URANC£ OREf!1IUM 5,Ct3J.Q0 24,E LNRURAKt P'PO4�I4iM 4 70. u0' 248 IN4UR ICE PRf.MTIJM 2j^.00 263 IN$URAN'CE 'RR♦ MI'.I1M 3b,D11.,p0' 243 TN' 1VONCt: PRLM'lUM '3,'0".Q'Q 24—T TN0URAN.0- PRFMI- M 4V, I 1 .11U' 2.43 INWRANCE PREMIUM 1`.,470,00 24J TNJ'U'kAtJCF. PRFMIUM 4;1.".110 ?4', xrlfiUd},At4rk pkemium $ 7.00 ?49 1flSU,RAWt HRVMTIIM 4;2112.—Q0 ,Wl rNWRANCF P9[4410M 1301JI._uq 343 TNSIIWANltF kk1F1IUM i,`1`rR_cm TOTAL 7,;', J 7 0. 00 a Uke F4(4A0CdAL 3•Y$1`EM. C2_s/,sa 15-:121:2.ti RPAf1T VxrE V, N004 GFfj-ORAL CHt:GICTNf 4'0186 .04/1DI/00 kbl THWE$T TEC1♦N)r,AI 0' V81 04/01/9`6 A G*WRI;OUS ti,14/1RCH 401,97 04,141%,96 A G' 61I9US ICHUWCH. 4,0 180 0''44al%98 .AGAW'S PEST 'CONTROL 40199 04/01/96 AMERICAN PA't3VJG OF M 40109 04/0'1196 AfV14KTQAt,1 P'AGIN6 OF M 40 ISD 04/01/98 AMERICAN PAGING OF M 40989 04/01/96 AMERI,CQN P.A(i''ENG Of 'M 40184 04/01M AM14IU1,1 W110f,, OF M •40100 04/0t/06 ANCONA14 FAGTIA OF M pfr 189 04/01/90 AMOftt'A'N PAGING 4F M. 40'18b 04/'bI/06• AMOICAN PAGGIN9 OF M ei0 400 09.,,/181/96 C .1. OROV4 IiiJSINec13 a 40 1'01 04/01/00 'Cr(LL'ULA'k 2000 OF 4T L,8 191 04/.0-1/9I3 uLtoi Ati iop$, of to 46 fe'1 Ot.10:l�ftG CELI't!'LAR '20'110 OF �iT 4a -"t o/o'1/4OF) Cr'LLULAR 220110. dl-- ',!T 4,(x.1-9') 0'4/4M1/W Cf-fMAI, MINN INIT-LAT An 103 06./W/..91D FEEHR,ITC :GC1NT WL$, T: 40 ?91 9�+/0`1'/rF0 Fr-0DQTTf oPJNTaOL^, T 40 194 04/0-1'/9'G 'GOLD0 tf4LFV FtIRNIT' ke oli 04/9'1/, 00 HF 17MLt,%. FOUY 4-0 161; 04/01/01 H(Vp ioN MAP it 41 ANY 0(1 IN) 04/01,/Of, 'H1101DCN MAP 'eQMl)AIJV Of 197 114/01/90 K MART '-,T, i1'F. 4111'14 04,;11'1/,RL tt4-1 Clrfml wl 4n TOU 04/01/94 tltuPi (:l,C,0NfN6f ei:t1 .'1: 04/0/00 l,1ir9 t1TANINC,, 0'i^buraement=Joorrml O.EStRTNT'IQtJ Aro01JtJT �. 1628 REfa 'SEE/FIR'E Df.RART 14M,V) .40432 Rfl'Mb/WATER METER DID, 140 .80434 RE,IMA/-W4TEt1 MV Ek 14.18 80.0 3 PEST C00TR0l,/LTBRAP'Y 49.80 981 PAVER CHARGES 18.38 9'J1 PA(jER'CHA1GEr $, 9,,1'9 0'81 PAGEk. CH08R 9 45.29 051 Pl6I R CHAAd-11 0.10 651 PAGCR CHARGES 9.19 05.1 PW41Z CHARGES 0119 :A5J PASeR' C:HARGb& 3.18. 051 PAGER CHARGES 9.19 W.01' 'Al LETT-01S FOr3' 0OWMI kk 112.t:U 7,0'4 T'ELEPNONL CH0.Rr3£S b'b.d,� Vit T6LURH60i-,. IiHA'OtiEB U. d4' 194 TFL`NP OrJE CHA'FIA 15,.:`. 1''J4, Ta1:f�NUtJt CFIARGF. 9, 7.1 74 .04 V! CMIF .{00NT YY1111, 1,00.0,1 58 'MM, PRPF 3LQV TCL::/WA 180,4111 5(1 CHELIIC;At.']/fbtt:'!! 74o'.OE U43•+Qb -170 .MATRS/rooNct4 :who 2,91,,00 01 L.1f1R'U''V ClYAN 46 17007 .221'.r:Lk' 10:22 'ATI A5 NAPO VORC i 10 91.0!7 4(d1 ',U'Ffit 1Ff,/oFu fi'Eli 30; YI.I t;rnurlbf,• ' k1 .1 J011,.G' );) tit c A143 r, yr dw+ 1, ; 1110 "J. 111 r :9': 06,/1x'1/')", F; -G)-,.' 1"1, ,, V, . :; , . 44- I I« q{ it'; t , , , ,,, tc &RC f kt4AN62AL SYSTEM 3$'p2t26 -'14RRANT Di9hrlr�'�h# �lrt+rel�1 ��3/20J9�6 DATE VP.ND'QR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT I GENERAL CHECKING '40200 04/01/96 t90NTIC'ELCO ANIMAL CO 1:38' ANIMAL GOM1`RQo COtJT 40289 04/01/96 MON'TICELLQ SENIOR Pi 19'$ MONTHLY CONTRACT T+Y 2,839.37 40202' 04/'01,/98 RIV9RS106 014, 4fl6 :GA9/STREET DEPT 1406.2? 4D203 Oar/01%.06 $10MAN/CA"fAN 1fl1 RET*/MF_AL$/SFMINAP 12..00 40204 04/D1%90 SZMP 0(4/CYtdTHIA 91,1!1 CkFMING/FIRF H'ALl 40x^0,5 04/01/90 THE f4AMArvfMFpT IN5TT .0043 RFri FfElt SH,FIMAN pn.0U 402010 04/01/96 It t3 I.Ifix 9`')n Tf'I EPMONF C140GEA 31°.1!1 46206 04/01/96 'U S LJNK .1i43, TEI EPHONf GHANGFS 441.,4 7 44MIG 04/01/80 Il S� (IfIY{ 9:5'n Tell-0 QNF CHA0ie,-) S.R7 40106 04/01/96 U :; L_FNK g5n I"1;(. PHOME LAARG S i,*) 40200 (14/01/96 11 S Ut;tt 9,,p TE'tFPHiaNF %MAl&Ve5 ':o.,r,7 1IP, Rri' t6 40207 04/01/1)0 t).0. P6 '` MAf#Tl q 1fiT 909 RENTAI; FEF: O'S.00 L 92ov 0/oLt/JO WRIGHT C;OIit;TY ALTDITO 719 SCOM RMANT PAYMF�JY won 0.,/0'1/+1E3 H,RLG}t T TLE 64ARA(4t 1(12.3 ItAT'IM'ARFK PPOP FFE:13 276.UT9 0F_.NERAL GHEGK'ENG TOTAL V0,05D.Wd BRC fINANCIAL SYSTEM, 03/96 T2:.37:18. NARRAN+T OATE, VENDOR OfNEAAL CHECKING 40210 64/x2/98 1(0900 ki(/;OLIVE 402:1/ 04/02/98 PREFETARED TITLE 402'12 04/02/96 PREFERRED TITLE 40 24.9 04/02 98 i0PIGNT COUNTY SURVEY 46214 04/02/96 UNIVCR91TV OF MINNES 402 f5 04/03/96 B CLEAN IN MOWYTCEL1, 4Q2-16. QL/0,3/00 ,Q'IG' LA9�� LOAI6ER 40217 04/03/96 FARNUM%TED 4041b 04,/03/98 FED EX 4021904/63/96 FERRELLGA$ C2-20 04/03/96 GENERAL RENTAL GENIE 40221 04/03/96 GL"6 iiUT%THE 40222. 04'/03/96 GOULD EROS. CHEs.V6OLD 40723 04/0,3,%96 GRANITE' CITY' IRON, V0 40224 04/03/90'HOGLUND'BUS COMPANY 40230 04/03/95 J. M OIL COMPANY 40,226 'D4y,0a1.>30 I.UK'ACµ/dOHN 40225 04 03/96'I'dK'ACH/JOHN, 40220 04%Q3/D6 L',vXACn/J"q 40220 04/03/95 I UKACHYOOHN 40227 04/03/96 MN CONWAY FIRE A' $AF 40220 0,4/O3/80 MONTICELIO WO MP104 40"D 04/0,3/96 MUNII'ECH, INC,. 40110 04/0'3/90 NORTHERN STATE- P00 40230 04/03/90 NOPTOtRN ! VATC �3 POWE: �1230 04/03/90 NORTHERN STATE`a POWE: J890 04/0/9U WQR'THkNN BTAT6 ,i POWE 40230 04/03/90 NORTHERN" STATE`.] POWE 40210 04/03"/ti6 N9RTHiRN OTATC.`3 0OWE o3sbursement Journ&l O:ESCR'IPTI,ON AMOUNT C 97 REHAB/'FOOD/MRA'MTO 73.9,3 1000 BOHANON PROPERTY P I"1z,6S.+54 1000 BCIHANON' PROPER? V PORCH .20,.100 632 ATERAL MAP/SUQGE- SITE 1'6.00 21:2 REG ;Fft).SFMINAR/R MAC' 115.`pO 1028 CtEAN `ORAPEA,/i(RMEA REIN 1,8.90 316 SAND/STREETS 8.23 1027 TRAVEL, REI'MB/FIR£ 'DEP :2.22'..6.0 394 RETURN SC'ANNEO/-PEC.YCLS 23.60 914 GASfKRAMEW RENTAL 258..30 84 SCA'FF£L f4TAL/STREET$ 65.04 fib I(,RAMER 'RENTAL RERAIR9 134.65 76 EQUIP REP'ATR OAR'T.S/FI'R 7.9.21 9'59 AUGER REPA'I.R'"/9TREE'TS 38..00 02 PARTS/STREET DEPT 2,2'1.42 95 (IAS/FIRE OEVT 23.'•$2 32.7 MILEAGE REJ$4@ 9,.99 327 MILZAGJ� REiMB O,.Iit) 327 MILEAf3E OlMn 9,. 9,i 727 VILPAG'k WfIMU 6.97 0,9'u *r` 2'5, '-IRF DFpr 1?ARTt, i92.AS• 620 MUFFItR CLAM0S/!0lR6,f TC 20.51 "J9 14El'AL'11'/Wk4L -04 145. U1F 140' UTI LI71E3 2.91Q.04 140 UTILITIES 316.61 140 LT IL 17 1F!; 5,,120.0.3 140 UTILITIES 70.U1 140 UTI LIT IE6 E20.73 140 UTILITIkO 14,21 n B'RC''FI,NANCIAL SKSTEM 03,/96 f 1.5 ,WARRANT 'DA -TE VENDQR GEMER'AL CHECKING 40231) 04/03'/,'96'NORTHERN SLATES POWt tv0230 i4/0'3/98 NORTHERN §TATES' POWE 40231 04/03/,96 NQR7HWEST MINNESOTA ,40232 04/0;3/88, ONE CALL CONCEPTS; I 40233 04/03/,96 OtTERSEN 'S MONT FORD, 4023,A 04'/03/86 PETTY, 'C'ASH' 4;0234 04/„Q3/9¢°PETTY 'CASH 4'0.234 '04/03/96 .PETTY 'CA3Mb 40234 04/08/.& PETTY CASH' 402 ,4 04/03/88 PETTY CASH 4023'4 04%03/96, PETTY CASH 40124 04/03%88 PETTY CASH 4493.5, 04/03/90 PL'UMBERY-PURCELL-''S P c123.5 6'4'/0WJ6 PLUMBERV-PURCELL'S P 4;0238 04/03,/98'QUSER 40237°04%03/90 R'AV S:CA'RPET 402333 04/03/96 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC 4028'8 04/03/96 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC •402'8`9 0'4/03/96' RUFF ,AUTO, PARTS, 4.0240 04/0.3(96 SIMONSON LUMBER ,COMP 40240 04/,03/80'SIMONSON LUMBER COMP 4024'0'04/0,3'/88SIMONSON LUMBER .COMP 40241 .04/03/96 ST,. CLO O 3,TEE.L. O.00R 40242 04/.03/00 UNITED L.AF30RATORI'ES 40243 '04'/03/98 ONIVEOUICY 'OF f4fk"e9 4034E Oa�03,/96 kUElEFt8H, REMOVp 024:4 011,/03/96 VAVA3N©UKO' R"ORDTRN t�MNVA Dlsburaement JourRa:l OESCRIPTION, AMOUN,-T; CL I 14:8 UTILI-71ES 571,130 148 UTI 'LIT IE$ 263.112 1.094. 17 *CH 156 'REG FEE/GARY ANDERSON tM DO 836 GOPHER. ONE STATE CALLS 84.00' 1,65 PAkT,S/STREET. DEPT 929.,8,5 168 'POSTAGE REIft So-, 0 1°66' PTZZA%PARXS COMM MTC, 33'.,.00 '1'8,6 OFFICE' 6UPPl'IES/C HALL 1:87 188 PK Relmge/SEMI,NA'R/GARY A 1;45 1'06 MAP/•SLU"E SITE 1:90 ' 169, FOOD/00"TWN REDEV,L MT 31,.,94 1'88 POP' Oe MB/CITY HAIL 83'.f10, 1.711.76 *Cl 251 BLD MTC SUPPLIES”,/,PARKS 10,.6k X261 '6CD' MTC SVPP,LIE9/SHOV 178.90 1'89:.,60 *cf ; 1030 MEMS'ERSHIP DUES''/C, SMUM, 8044 '1.031'NEW CARPET/KRAMER,REN: 812.49 227'PARTS/STREETS 6.76 227 VEHICLE MIC/STREETS 18.:00 24.7,8 +G 208. WIPERS/ST'RE&V 3`h.18 193 ,SUPPLIE'S,,/P 'WORKS ; I14SPE 49'.58 1,'.73: KRAMER RENTAL 00"Ef k'EPAT 8.86 493 OTC 6.VPP.L E /'946P 90.7:8 14'8.21 itc, t02.e 04,tL 000R/01AMPER QLD G3 q0 ` ,634 CLEANIN'O 3.1 PP 4106/0,AR 6,70 1'0 I 212 5HAliE ►REF, UFleiNA'$/T`L#1 4'S.;pU 524 G06AcE CONTP'AL'T 10.344.57 82'4 9AL'FS TAX /RARAAGE 90� 6C7,,31 IOi0t13.69 •L,+ BRC 0-INWCIAL .SYggYEM E /0)/98 112:3 7 : 1'5 Z04/9"S' DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40245 04;/09./96 .VERGINS APPLIANCE 40248 04/031,96.MATERP,RO SUP'PLIE$ CO 4"0t46 04/03/96 M47ERPRO 'SUPP.:CIfSCO 40249 04/03/94 WRIGHT *ENNEP'IN ''9ECu 40247 0'4/03'/96 WRTGHT HENNEPIN SECU 4020 04/03/96 ARIGHT^HENNEPIN COOP" GENE'RA'L .CHECKING Disbursement Journal: OLSCRIATION AMOUNT CL 99434- REF.R'IGERATOR/'ARAMER R 1'99.'99 67b MATER METERS 67:7:49 670 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/:SE 424.63, 1�, 3t72. 12 'MCN 87'$ ALARM MIG A990T/0E:PRE 10: J 2 875 ALARM MTC AGRMT/P,ARK'$ 1.5.$9' 3$.1'0 "MCH , 54-2 UttLITTEZ ,9.00 TOTAL 981565x.99 0 BRC FINANCIAL 'SYSTEM 04j08/96 09-574.08 LRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40249 04/00/96 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 40280 04/09/9 . 6 A.E. MICHAELS 40250 04/09/96 A-E- MICHAELS 402Si 641/09/96 ANDERSON/GARY 40252 04/09/98' BEN FRANKLIN 40253 04,/08/9S-CULLIGAN 40253 04/09/98 CULLIGAN 40254 04102t96 0 & it REFUSE kECYCLI 40255 04/09/96 OYNA SYSTEMS 40256 04/09/96 EMERGENCY APPARATUS 4020 04/09/96 G & K SERVICES (1257 04/09/06 0 & K SERVICES ,0257 04/09/96 G a K SERVICES 40,257 04/09'/88 0 & K SERVICES 4.0257 04/60/96 G & K SERVICES 40257 04/0 1 0/96 G & K. SERVICES 40257 04/09/96 G',& K SERVICES 40257 04/09/96 1 & K- SERVICES 46267 04'/09/88 G'& K SERVICES 40250 04/09/96 HARRY" - 6 AUTO SUPPLY 402,69 04/'09'/98 HARRY S' AUTO SUPPLY 40258.04/69/06 HARRY t AUTO SUPPLY 40259 :0116/09196 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 40150 04/09/96 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 4025R 04/0 r 9/,96 "ARRT:�S AUTO SUPPLY 40259 04/0906 HARRY'S AOt6 SUPPLY 4,0250 04/00/96 KERMWOE40 40260'04/0'9/98 HEWLETT 'PACKARD 40260 04/09/96 HEWLETT PACKARD 026t 04/09/66 KEN ANDERSON TRUC*tN Disbursement. Journal OESCRIPT30N. AMOUNT 118 WATE,R/,S.N!DW/`ATV REG 780.09 338 PAINT;/SHOf` & GARAGE- 59.37 339 BLD . REPAIR SUP/SHOP 74.13 13 3_50 11 TRAVEL REIMS/SEMINAR 10.12 20 SUPPLIES'/SLUDGE DISPOSA S..02 7'5 3 CREQtIT/MARCk/OVEk PYAT i-iSCR 753 WATER SOFTNER/iEWTAL 23.11 2i.95 611 RECYCLING CHARGES 3,305.*98 50 NUTS & BOLTS/SHOP 293,99 460 FIRE OEPT VEHICLE MTC 53.00 051 UNIFORM CHARGES 97.06 66.1 UNIFORM CHARGES 89:44 6151 UNIFORM CHARGES, 24.28 tqS!j� UNIFORM CHARGES 24,20 -051, UNIFORM CHARGES' 219.97, 951 UNIFORM CHARGES i sib .60, 051 RAGS/SHOP -6 GARAGE' 45.0'6 051 RUG,MATS/O0P REG OF.YIC 29-04 051 RUG UG IWATS/SN6P & GARAGE0 2,. 20 600.63 70 SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 21.06 74 BLD mtc- su;�PLIES/Smop 14,80 70 EQUIP REPAIR PARY'SANO 54.26 70 VEN REPAtR'PAR.TS/SEVER i9.23 70 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/STR 084,07 10 VEH REPAIR. PARTS/STREE 1,2185 78 T60t$06HOP a GAR SIAS 279,53 el LIBRARY CLEANING 22,7.50 1033 COMPUTER PRINTER MANUA 49.00 1033 COMPUTER PAPER TRAY 0702 136.12 697 ANIMAL CONTROL GERVIC 111.e9 0 A L BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/06/98. .09,:57:09 'ZRR'ANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING. 40262 04/09/96 MAU8 FOODS 4025204/09/98 MAUS FOODS 40263 04/09/96 MINNEGASCO 40263 04/08/96 MINNEGASCO 40263 04/09/96 MINNEGASCO 40263 04/09/96 MINNEGASCO '40263 04/09/96 MINNEGASCO 4026304/09/98 MINNEGASCO 40283 04/09/96 MINNEOASCO 4.0263 04/09/96 MINNEGASCO 40264 04/09/96 MONTICELLO'ANIMAL CO 40285 04/09'/,98 NATIONAL 'BUSHING PAR 40'265 04/09'196 NATIONAL ;806H1;'NE PAR. 46265 04/09198 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR, 40265 04,/09%96, NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 40205 04/09/88 NATIONAL BUSHING P'AR C7285 04'/08/96 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR '0265 04/09/98 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 40265 04/09/96 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 40266 04/09/96 PHOTO'l 40268 04/00/96 PHOTO I 40268 04/08/98 PHOTO I 40287 04/09/06 PREUSBE''$ CLEANING S 40260 04/08/96 PROFEBSIONAL SERVICE 4:0269 04108/86 RITA PLUNNETT 40270 04/08/8,6 8304PS'ON104ARC 40271 04/09/98.WEIMAN/QENEVIE,V,E 40272 04/08/90 WOLKERSTOOFER CO INC 40279 04/09/96 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITS 40273 04/.09/96 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO )374 04/09/00 WRIGHT COUNTY JOURNA Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION- AMOUNT 108 SUPPLIES/ANIMAL'CONTR,O 30.45 1,08 SUPPLIES%SHOP 8 G'AR I 3.,78 44.23 77.2 UTILITIES 283.82 772 UTILITIES 173.26 7.72 UTILITIES 78,.22 772 UTILITIES 142.35 772 UTILITIES 9.86 772 UTILITIES 329.11 772 UTILITIES 2,119.54 7-72 UTILITIES 62.47 3,196.45 1",65 ANIMAL CONTROL SERV 1.129.70 144 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/ST 180,.22 144 VEH REPAIR PARTS%S_TRE, 108..20 1,44 SHOP'9UPPL,IES' '29.38 144 EQUIP REPAIR PAR,US%S4O il-.-58 0' 144 O'IL/STNEET'DEPT 25.50 144 VEH REPAIR PARTS/SEWER, 12,.69 144 REPAIRS/SHOP 34.28 144 SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 17:.15 628.00 748 PHOTOS/BOHANON FARM 74.23 743 PHOTOS/BRIAR 6A11 II 1'3.39 743 MISC PHOTOS/P W'INSPEC 45.03 133.25 173 'CITY. HALL CLEANING 400.00 17.8 WWTP MONTHLY CONTR y3,248..g3 .„0.0439 ,MAILBOXISNOWPLOW DAM' 187.00 504 TRAVEL REIMS/SEMINAR 108`.88 :.80435 REFUN,O/OVERPYMT A%ME 1'24.98 800 REPAIRS/.SNOW 8 ICE 565.00 219 SHERIFF'S CONTRACT 25,294.00 219 AOD'L LANDFILL CHUB' 6,4.21.10 91,855.70 233 RENEWAL/JOURNAL PRESf3 28.00 BRC F.INANCI"AL SYSTEM 04/08/96 09:57:08 (--RRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40275 04/09/96 MSB & ASSOCI'ATES, IN 40275 04/09/96 WSB & ASSOCIATES, IN 40275 04,/09/96 WSB & ASSOCI'ATES, IN 40275 04/09/98 WSS & ASSOCIATES, IN 4,02,75 04./09/96 'WSB & ASSOCIATES, IN 40215 04/091/96 MSB & ASSOC'IATES, IN 40275 04/09/96 WS6 & ASSOCIATES, IN 40215 04/09/86 MSB & ASSOCIATES, IN 40275 04/09/96 WSB & ASSOCIATES, IN 40275 64/09/98 MSB & ASSOCIATES, IN 40275 04/09/96 MSB & ASSOCIATES, IN 40275 04/09/96 WSB & A'SSOCI'ATES, IN 40275 04/09/96 WSB & ASSOC,IATES, IN Dtsbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 993 ENG FEES/KJELL'BERG EA 21;2.50 993 ENO F£ES/EASTWOOD KNOL 42.50 993 ENG FEES/HWY '2,5 & CEO 897.50 993 ENG FEES'/RES CHURCH 85.00 993 ENG FEES/RUFF AUTO 42.50 993 ENG FEES/MONTE FORD 42.,50 993 BLD INSP FEES/DAVE"KL 212'.50 983FEES%MISSISSIPPI SHORE 42.50 993 FEES/STAFF & CC MTGS 292.50 993 STATE AID NETWORK FEE 552.50 993 FE'E'S''/M'OAK 4TH ADD 127.50 993 ENG FEES/,BR OAKES 2ND 970'.00' 883 FEES/STORM SEW TRUN 3,748.75 7,268.75 40276 04/09/96 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPO 2.24 CONTRACT PYMT 625:00 40217 04,/09/98 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, GENERAL CHECKING N 499 BROOM REFILL/STREETS 328.02 TOTAL 85,966.23 0 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/09/98 12:44:40 VwRRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40218 04/0,9/96 VEROINS'APPLIANCE. 4.021.9 04•/10198 ANDERSON 8 ASSOCIATE 40279 04/110%96 ANDERSON & ASSOCI'AT'E 40280 '01.1i0196 AUTOMATIC GARAGE 000 '40281 04/10/96 BEACON B'ALLF.IELDS 40282 014/VO'/96 BUFFALO CLINIC 40283 04/10/96 CONWORTH, INC: 40284 04./40/9'8 FED EX 40205 OA/10/96 GOVERN FINANCE OFFIC 40208 04/10/96 HDR ENGINEERING, INC 40287 04/•10/98 HENRY ® ASSOCIATES -.,0288 04110186 JOHN C FARRELL 40289 04/10/90 KENNEDY:& GRAVEN 40289 04/10/96'KENNEDY & GRAVEN 40209 04/10/96 KENNEDY & GRAVEN 40288 04/10/96 KENNEDY 8 GRAVEN 40290 04/10/98 LABREE/WAYNE 40291 04/10/96 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 40291 04/10/98 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 4029.1 04/10%96 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 4029.1 04/10198 LARSON'SACE HARDWAR 40291 04/40/90 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 40291 04%10/96 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 40294 94/10/06 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 40201 04/•1.0/96 LARSON'S "ACE HARDWAR 4029`1 04.11•0/96 LARIION,'S ACE HARDWAR 40291 04/I40/06 LAR£ON'S ACE HAROMAR 40791 04110/8 6 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 4020.1 04/10'/90 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR c40292 04/10/00 MN PUD EMPLOY LABOR Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CI 90434 FRIG/DEP REG OFFICE 199:99 10 SIGN/STREET DEPT 199.75 10 E_SENCHES/PARKS 1,793.93 1,993.28 •CI 260 GARAGE DOOR OPENERS 181.88 648 BASES/BALLFIELD.S/PARK 981..53 '1006 PHYSICAL EXAM%TIM G 79.,00 1035 PROF SERV/KATZMAREk P.'105 00 394 POSTAGE/WWTP EXPAN 15.50 71 MEMBERSHIP DUES 30.00 944 ENG FEES/WWTP EXP 136,784.00 545 METERS/MATER DEPT 1,403.62 .10437 APPRAISAL/FLUTH PROP 300.00 939 LEGAL FEES/KATZMAREK 418.50 938 LEGAL FEES/FLUTH DEMO 41.2.50 839 MISC LEGAL FEES/HRA 283.80 039 LEGAL FEES/OOWN,TWN RE 880.70 21093.50 +CI 1034 'TRAVEL REIMS/SEMINAR 304.68 814 SUPPLIES/SHOP &'GARAG 117.12 874 8L0 SUPPLIES/SHOP 35.30 874 840 MTC SUPPLIES/PARKS 17.10 074 SUPPLIES/MATER DEPT 11.52 874 SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 16..58 874 PARTS/SNOW & ICE 2.78 874 CLEANING,S'UP/LIBRARY 30.78• 674 SUPPLIES/P WORKS INSP 111.81 874 SUPPLIES/MATER DEPT 81.60' 074 TOOLS/WATER 'DEPT 21, Z9 874 C0RRGCT CODING 11.0>CR 874 KRAMER RENTAL REPAIRS 222.88 633.33 r0 423 MEMBERSHIP DUES/RICK 150.00 F3 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/09/96 12:44:46 CARRANT 'DATE VENDOR Disbursement Journal DESCRIP.T.ION AMOUNT CL GENERAL CHECKING 40293 04/10/96' MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS 493 MEMBERSHIP DUES/FIRE D 65.00 40294 04/1096 MONTICEL,LO OFFICE PR 08. OFFICE SUPPLIES/.P WOR 109.23 4.0294 04/10/98 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 136 OFFICE SUPPLIES/C HAL 38/.94 40294 04/fi0/86 MON74CELLO OFFICE PR 138 OFFICE SUPPLIES/LIBRAR 37.33' 40294, 04/1.0/96 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 1 .36 OFFICE E 29,92 40294 04/'10/96 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 136 PAPER/SUPPLIES/PATHWAY 34.06 MISC ENG FEES 1136640 40290 04/10/96 ORR-OCHELEN-MAYERON 162 ENG FEES/SCHOOL BLV 1,689.77 4.0299 597.48 r'CP 40295 04/10/96 MONTICELLO TIMES 40295 04%10/96 MONTICELLO, TIMES 40295 04/10/96 MONTICELLO TIMES 40295 04/10/96 MONTICELLO TIMES 402,95 04/10/'98 MONTICELLO TIMES 402'95 04/10/96'MONTICELLO TIMES 40295 04/10/96 MONTICELLO TIMES 40295 04'/10/66 MONTICELLO TIMES 40295 04/10/96 MONTICELLO TIMES 40295 04/10/96 MONTICELLO TIMES 4.0295 04/40/96 MONTICELLO TIMES ` 40296 04/10/96 NEWTON MANUFACTURING 140 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 1,485.38 140 SNOWPLOWING ADINFO 87'.20 1;40 BLO PERM & SNOWMOB IN 156.80 t40 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 109,.,88 140 "MAGIC" CONGRATULATION 84•.00 140 LIBRARY BOARD OPENING 4.,60 140 FIRE/MTG & INFO AD 94;.50 140 PARKS/HELP WANTED AO 37.53 146 BOHANON FARM/PUB NOTIC 24.33 140 REFURBISH WELLS 'NOTICE 90.55 140 BLD OFFICIAL HELP AD 268:80 2.466.37 •GI 519 SUPPLIES''/FIRE DEPT 205.79 40297 04/10/96 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 160 BCD MTC SUPPLIES/SHOP 9.12 4'0297 04/1'0/96 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 160'BLO,MTC SUPPLIES/PARK 194.92 204.04 *CI 40290 04/10/96 OLSON. USSET,AGAN & 292 MISC LEGAL 'FEES 1,402.90 4,0208 04/10/96 OLSON, USSET,AGAN & 2.82 LEGAL FEES/BOHANON FM 602.50 2.005.00 loci 4'0,299 04/1,0/96 ORR-SCHELEN-MAVERON 162 ENG FEES/C HILLS'V 519.97 40290 04/10/96 ORA-SCHELEN=MAYERON 162 MISC ENG FEES 1136640 40290 04/10/96 ORR-OCHELEN-MAYERON 162 ENG FEES/SCHOOL BLV 1,689.77 4.0299 04/10/90 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 162 ENG FEES%MISS SHORES 95.00 40299 04/10/96 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYER,ON 1.62 EWG FEES/KLEIN R.ARMS 1'90.00 40299 04/10/96 ORR-SCHELEN-MAY,ERON 162 ENG FEES/HWY 25/CHE 9,637.24 13,621,.96 *Cl 40300, 04/10/90 SATHRQ SERGQUIST. 114 1024 EASEMENT/RIVER MILLS 300.00 40301 04/1n/90 GCHLUENDFR COM STRUC.T 107 DEMO/WWTP RENTAL 1.100:-00 GENERAL CHECKING N TOTAL 166,401.17 URC FINANCIAL SYSTEM' ,.Q3/29/36 10:35<50 Dicbursenant Journ;,l l,f �,7ARFjAN7 OATE VENDOR OESCRIPTTON AMOUNT LIQUOR^ CHECKIFJG V0 64 4 03/28/96 GRIP-PAK RLTNIL INC 800F82 CHECK VOIDLO 18678 02,/28/96 OLSON R DONS FIECTR'I 800048 MTC OF ESLD REPAIRg 18679 03/28/86 U S WEST COMMUNICATi 800093 AOVERTTSING 14680 03/28/96 LIEFERT T'VICKING 000Dt5 FRF1G)IT' CH4RfiE_5 1t)OU1 03/?R/96 7fu MANUF'AL'1,11kltj6 000104 CI.l-A1JING SQPPLTFS 10&8? 0',4/28/96 QUALITY GINE & SP1"RT' 800040 L IQUOR V'114CHAV( 1806? 03/28/98 QUALLTV WINE F ,51,IR1 800040 NINE PURCHASE 18083 U3/20/9G PHILLIPS WINE. R tPI'R 60018U FREIGHT CHARULS 18403 UB/28/90 PHILLIPS WINE A SPIR 800180 LIQUOR PORCHASE 18683 03/28/90 PH'ILLIP,, WINE A SPIR 000180 WINE PURCHASE 10683 03/28/90 PHILLIPS WINE to SPIR 80080 MIX FOR RESALE 10084 03/20/00 tikIit6$, COOPER ,& GAM 8000,16 L.IQLMR PURCHASE 136a4 03/20/9G 'GR1130;1, COOPER 0 CUM 900016 iREIGHT CHAR,GC 1.0005 03/2U/90 EAOL'E WINE COMPANV ()00013 FPCICHT CHARGE 10006 03/?0/ 18 EAGLE WINE COMPANV 000042 WINE. PORCHAcit 1'0000 03/20/fl0 F05TEk-'FRAN?f-tJ-L'ARLO 01`10011. 7NSNRANCf, f44MIllM 106n7 03/?0/06 0AY oirn-v tau nw, t:om :)1x05101 row AI,961H11t IC fit, CR 101a:17 'n3/R0/OU UAV f+ICTRIUUTINS COM 0011510 t1L1,R PULCHA:•f t0il,�r; 0)/Sp/9G ORO;I ,LI itJ HEV(&A1rL 1. 001/1117 1)Ll:'R 1'll.t'i"MA �F 1 06115 0) f :1r: f'Jti ,OTCK WH01 1 Aft CO., Q7100 i f1I ! t: 11INCHA10L 1;)Ut)U tIJ/?N/UG THORPE 011,IRT111111tJG hll(11ry f',f.lk pll(a.HA'i{ IJQD1 0'.)/21./96 1DAHL111 I11I P OtSTNIL141 f1Un.QxJ') [if 1-0 V1101-11VA. IJ6'I1 V/20/90 DAt11'11f1M,-R D1`:TktkllT UQ.Q00!l NON Al t u 1 -It TI? t.Ff 1` TI)-; TFLEC,M 00f110C; rl 1 tVtt!'iJf f 11ni.'1;,+ c 1111,9:' tl7/,�Offllr Ttl'., 1(1!G'1M !)Ui110�1 At3VLFtFY1l'tfJh t 18. tbCF' OFi . `.rll !a.OU 104,79 44.`,1 F7 I . '4 92U 67 1,791.:x1 112 Eli 377.10 479.49 71.75 841 .'!:t 80.i . v) 4.10 007 . b'1 13.44 436,.!!; 4b0.23 7,5411.110 •17.rtx ,,i,4 .('1 4, 1:. L :1 J ) 4,4Uh. ;h ! A 9 A C,RC FINANCIA'l SYSTEM 03/29%$0 10,:,35150 O9sburQpmont •lournil 'ARRANT UATE VFr100R [IEBLRSPluol,1 AM01101 L IQUO>y CH'EG1•(INfi 18,601f 03/28/86 Pj1IL41PS WINC & 8'PIR 800'i0'0 £RFTGMT CHARGt`$ 7_1.7'{.. 18893 03/28/98 PHILOOS NfNE @ SPIR 800180 'LIQUOR PURCHA'F 1•,830.90 1,852.73 4 19VO4 03/28,/98 THORPE OI$TRI,B'11TTNG 800048 'BEER 'PURCkA9E 4,7W4.W 1°9094 03/28/9.6 THORPE OISTRT8UT1HG 800048 NON ALCOHOLIC BEER 21.30 4. 77j8 . ,(W # 1.8605 03/28/96 JOHNSON OROS WHOLESA 800027 FREIGHT CHAR(IES 99.76 IT605 b3/28/96 JOHNSON' BRAS WHDLE'SA 900022 LIQUOR PUkCAA£E 82 .62 186,9= 0y/29/96 JOHNSON PRO$'WHOtf.'S4 ab6tl?2 WINE PURCHASE 3,195.9I 110086 09/26/96 OAMLHET.b1EP 0I3TRIBUT 00009 ®EI P. t+11RCHA8E 3,u29.91• 1960 A3/2R/96 DAHLHEIME.k OTSTRIBIIT 300009 NON ALCOH'ULIC 6FkR b4..'10 3 ,NOO. (3''. 1 13H07 03/20/66 DICK WHOLESALE CO.. bp001t.BEGR PURCKAIE S49•1t11 10-,90 0T/?8/9R CQWf311-TN 41F,VEPArf I H000"16 4Fl,R V4k611AGF A,hf,4,V. 1DR90 03/26'/98 hknSSLFTN bFVERA6L I 00001!1" TFWLLf,/S[WkLIES 112..N). 0 10(199 (1]/207/90 gIIALITY WINL G ;NIRT 1)0004(1 0900k PUR0,MAIlt t1,1I11.41 106JD 03/24/06 QLI'A!, ITY 0,01E P' 6Pi'01 COU04,10 WV4L 'PVWCHA4( tl,1)4y,1J,} d 10 00 OJ/20,/9II FOS TER-FRANZLN-CARL U1 A0011 INWRANCt. PREM? 544, 1Q 1.8701 0"l/20/.09 CA�LC 'WINE, iC(*0AMY 00001? W<IN& 0(RGHAGE 4U8.25 10702 07/211%09 LEAGUE Of ON f ITTPS 0()00`+5 V01RANt,'t GRFM#UN ",1,;`.(111.0'0 1.i(111,oP CHECt(IpG, TOTA1. 0 BRC F114ANCIAL SYSTEM 04/03/9'8 1213-6-:02, Disbursement Journal LRRANT. DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT t ,LIQUOR CHECKING 1.8.70308/29/98 BELLBOY CORPORATION 800098 -COOLERS FOR RESALE 62.50 18704 03/29/96 BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA 800001 POP, PURCHASE 340.00 1,870503/28/96 CONSOLIDATED COMM DI 600163 ,ADVERTISING^ 4-7..50 1.87 08 03/28/96 DAHLHE,IMER DISTRIBUT 800009 BEER 'PURCHASE 6:,.826.80 18708 03/29/96 DAHLHEIMER DISTRJ64T 800,009 NON A4COHOLI BEER 98.60 6.,923.$0 s 18701 03/29/96 DAY DISTRIB'Ul'ING COM 8000'10 BEER PURCHASE 286.90 1;87 08 03/291,98'DICK WHOLESALE CO.;, 800011 BEER PURCHASE `:29.20 187''08 03'/29/$8 DICK VHOLESALE CO., 800011 N014ALCOHOLICOEE-R 72.40 (.8708 03/29/98 DICK WHOLESALE CO., 800.01-1 LIQUOR STORE ,SUP,P.LIES 1'0.,8'5 612.25 1'87 08 08129/98 DISCOUNT PAPER PRODU 60017? SUPPLIES/PAPER 411.99 18'710 03,/29/96 DRIVERS LICENSE GUIO 800013 DRIVERS GU'IDE.SUBS-CRIP 21.55 11 03/29/96 EAGLE .WINE COMPANY 500012 WINE PURCHASE 64;:67 (87 '187 11 03/29/98 EAGLE WINE ,COMPANY 8000,12 CREDIT -/RETURN 25.00CR 10711 03/29/9'6 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 8000,1,2 -FREIGHT CHARGES 5.90 48.67 187 12 0$,/2,0/88 FLESCH'S PAPER'SERVI 8001,16 SUPPLIES/PAPER SAGS 150.73 18712 03,/29/96 FLESCH'S- PAPER SERVI 600116 'LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 23.48 174.21 187 13 03/29/96 0 a 'K SERVICE 800120 MTC OF 'DLO/RUGS 1;,Oa.ti0 187 14 03/29/98 GETTMAN COMPANY 800187 CIG L14HTERS FOR RESA 190.00 1'87'15.03./49/96 GRIGOS, COOPER 6 COM 8000,19 LIQUOR PURCHASE 0,043..02 10-119 03/28/06 GRIGGS, COOPER 6 GDM 800018 FRFIQHT CHARGES 21.24 8,005.OU 187 0 0,9/29/96 GR03SLEIN Ab ERA(,,E 1000019 IlCER PURCHASE 8,608.0) 18717 03/29/06 HOME JUICE 800136 JUT" FOR RFGALt 52.65 10710 03/29/94 1U6AL A0VERTT0N11 8UU1'," VEtflb" 177.00 10719 03,/21/96 JOHNSON F1005 WHOLkUA 0000214 Et16I0HT CHAkGE'', 24.09 19710 03/29/78 JQHNUON OR09 WHOLEfA 000022 t TQIl0k .PUkCHASE 707.4J (r 37 11 '03/29/00 0OHN80N t1k03 WHOLF,5A 800022 MtNt. P11,ECHA` k' U98.00 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM d4/63/98 11:36:02 Disbursement Journal ERRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT t LTQ60RCHECKING 18720 03'/29/88 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 800184 FURNACE FILTERS' 1,9.52 18721 03/28/96 LI'EFERT TRUCKING 80,0025 FREIGHT CHARGES 203.7'1 18722" 03/29/96 MINNEGASCO 800160 UTILIT,ILS 210.21 18723 03/29/96 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 136 OFFICE SUPPLIES .5.88 1.8724 03/29/96 NEWTON MANUFACTURING 800149 SUPPLIES/PENS 124.98 18725 03/29/96 NORTHERN STATES POWE 800035 UTILITIES 768.38 18726 03/29/96 OLSON'& SONS ELECTRI 800036 'MTC OF BCO/BALLAST LIG 66.94 18728 03/28'/88 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 600036 NEW LIGHT BULB 6.00 72.94 18727 03/29/96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800.180 FREIGHT CHARGES, 5.25 19127'03/29'/96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 8001,80 LIQUOR PURCHASE 631.40 18727 03/29/98 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 8001'80 CREDIT/MINE RETURN 11.19CR 625.5.2 9728 Q3/?9/96 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI'800040 WINE PURCHASE 81'6;,,8,2 18728 03/29/96 QUALITY MINE & SPIRI 800'040 LIQUOR PURCHASE 316.11 1,292.99 + 18729 03/29/98 RON'S ICE COMPANY 800041 ICL PURCHASE 187.32 18730 03/29/96 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 800045 MIA FOR RESALE 292.44 18730 03/R9/90 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 80004$ JUICL,FOR kESALE 38.50 328.A4 ► 10731 03/29/96 THE WATSON CO.. INC. 80.0'202 CICS FOR RESALE 63.b0 18A31 03/29/96 THE WATSON CO.. TNC. 900262 LIQUOR STORE 'SUPPLIES 66.42 130.,92 ► 18732 03/29%98 THO'RPE DISTRIBUTING 800049 BEER PURCHASE 14,777.Jb 18792 03/78/90 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 NON ALCOHOLIC BECR 120.45 14.1m. 130 4 18933 03/20%90 U S LINK 4900195 TELEPHONE CHARGES 8.29 10734 O'3/29/96 VIDEO PROTECTION SER 800189 VIDEO TAPES/SUPPLIES 59.49 10735 03/2,0/90 VIKING COCA-COLA DOT 600051 POP PURCHASE 629.50 03/29/96 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 800054 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 10.42 (18136 lIQuOR CHECKING TOTAL 40,999.34 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/09/96 12:46:11 �-IRRAN T DATE VENDOR LIQUOR CHECKING 19737 04/10/96 BUFFALO CLINIC, PA 18738 04/10/96 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 18738 04/10/96 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 10738 04/10/96 EAGLE WINE COMPANY N Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLn 800205 PHYSICAL/MICHAEL F 80.00 800012 BEER PURCHASE 97.50 800012 WINE PURCHASE 1,751.75 800012 MIX FOR RESALE 222.79 2,072.04 3,823.56 1,319.75 22.50 567.79 1,910.04 800032 ADVERTISING 142.90 800032 MONTICELLO TIMES SUBSC 28.00 170.90 18739 04/10/96 GRIGGS, COOPER & COM 800018 LIQUOR PURCHASE 18740 04/10/96 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 LIQUOR PURCHASE 18740 04/10/96 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 FREIGHT CHARGES 18740 04/10/86 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 WINE PURCHASE 18741 04/10/96 MONTICELLO TIMES 18741 04/10/96 MONTICELLO TIMES 18742 04/10/96 MONTICELLO VACUUM CE 800050 HAND VAC 1074 04/10/86 PAUSTIS & SONS 800103 FREIGHT CHARGES 187431 04/10/88 PAUSTIS & SONS 600103 WINE PURCHASE 18744 04/10/96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800160 WINE PURCHASE 18744 04/10/96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 000180 LIQUOR PURCHASE 10744 04/10/08 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 800.180. FREIGHT CHARGES 1874E 04/10/88 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 800040 WINE PURCHASE 10745 04/10/90 QUALITY WINE & SP1RI 000040 LIQUOR PURCHASE 10746 04/10/96 TRAVELERS DIRECTORY 800007 ADVERTISING 18747 04/10/00 U S, WEST COMMUNICATI 800093 ADVERTISING LIQUOR CHECKING TOTAL 31.84 7.90 528.00 535.00 2,133.10 2.021.11 66.94 4,221.15 261.06 4,817.34 5,178.40 187.00 29.00 18,240.93 *CH *CH *CH VCH *CH *CH BRC FLN'ANCIAL SYSTEM 04/15/96 13:49:20 Disbursement Journal �7ARR'ANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL 14 tC1 LIQUOR CHECKING 18748 04/15/96 D,AHLHEIMER DISTRIBUT 800009 NON ALCOHOLIC BEER 153.•00 18748 04/15/96 OAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUT 800609 BEER PURCHASE 8,105.00 8,258.80 18749 04'/15./9,6 DAY DISTRIBUTING COM 900010 BEER PURCHASE 2S3.10 18750 04,/15/96 DICK WHOLESALE CO., 800011 BEER PURCHASE 1,362,55 19750 04/15/96 DICK WHOLESALE CO— 800011 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 21,63 1.084.38 18751 04/15/96 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 FREIGHT CHARGES 8,.40 18751 04/15/96 EAGLE NINE 'COMPANY 800012 WINE PURCHASE 1,000,52 10751 04/15/96 - EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 MIX FOR RESALE 25.49 1,034.41 18752 04/15/90 GRIGGS., COOPER & COM 800019 LIQUOR PURCHASE 2,153.38 18753 04/15/96 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I 000019 BEER. PURCHASE 7,304.90 10754 04/15/9,6 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 WINE PURCHASE 1,370.04 18754 04/15/-98 JOHNSON OROS WHOLESA 800022 LIQUOR, PURCHASE 243.32 18754 04/15/96 JOHNSON OROS WHOLESA 000022 FREIGHT CHARGES 24.94 1,547.10 18755 04/15/98 LEHMANN FARMS 800190 FOOD ITEMS FOR RE'S'ALE G0.30 1075;0 04/15/96 PHILLIPS WINE A SPIR 0001160 FREIGHT CHARGES 17.63 10756 04/15/96 PHILLIPS WINE 8 3PIR 9001.00 LIQUOR PURCHAUE 637.53 10750 04/15/06 PHILLIPS WINE B,DP'Ik 000100 WINE PURCHASE 660.18• 1,516.32 10767 04/15/80 TOG TELECOM 000196 TELEPHONE CHARGEE 175.99 10757 04/1.3/96 TOS TELECOM DOOM ADVERTIGING 64.30 ?31.09 1'07541 04/1.5/99 THORPC O[iYRIUUTING 000040 OFiR PURCHASE. 0,037.70 10750 04/16/90 THORPE 01cYRIBUTING 000040 IMI ALCOHOLIC 'BEER r�0.25 0,001.54 10701) 04/15/06 TOTAL ULGIBTER EYCTE 00011'2 G'UPPGIF9/LARFLS 24.30 I,IQ1j0A CHOCKING T©TAI. 3^,077.07 14 tC1 COUNCIL UPDATE April 22, 1998 Fireworks at the Riverfest celebration. (W.K.) At a Riverfest meeting, April 11th, the Monticello Lions made the decision to have the fireworks display on Sunday evening next to the Monticello Middle School. The City Council and the Monticello Chamber of Commerce requests to have the fireworks on Saturday night were presented. The Lions made the decision regarding Saturday or Sunday evening by calling other cities that have had fireworks displays and talking with Lion members. The Lions portion of Riverfest is mainly conducted on Sunday and because Riverfest falls on the 4th of July weekend this year many members will be out of town until Suinday. The Lions concluded that many residents might also be gone for part of the 4th of July weekend. Other cities recommended that fireworks on Saturday night encouraged many people from other communities to attend but Sunday was mainly area residence. The fireworks will be the grand finale of the 1998 Riverfest Celebration. The Lion's Riverfest Committee is very enthused about the addition of the fireworks to the celebration and thanked the City for the contribution. COUNCIL UPDATE April 17, 1996 Enclosed you will find a draft of the study which is presented for your review prior to official distribution to the public. The purpose of the study was to determine the best position for a future intersection serving the area on State Highway 25 directly south of the freeway. Another goal of the study was to identify service roads and access points to State Highway 25. The information provided would enable the City to properly plan for acquisition of necessary right-of-way before the area is completely developed. As you will note, OSM outlined two potential alignments which were selected after considerable study and discussion at staff level. The alignments were identified based on a number of criteria, including: 1. Degree of impact on existing businesses. 2. Coat of land acquisition. 3. Separation distances between other access points to Highway 25. 4. Ability to utilize existing roadways. 5. Potential impact on wetlands and storm pond areas. 6. Degree of enhancement of value to affected parcels. 7. Ease of traffic flow for efficiency and safety. Staff took the liberty of sending the study to MN/DOT for review prior to submission to the public. As you can see in the attached letter from Terry Humbert, MN/DOT is supportive of the project. According to Bret, MN/DOT has significant funds budgeted for Highway 25 improvements for 1998 construction. Funds are sufficient to construct nn expansion to four lanes from the freeway to the Kjellberg Mobile Home Park. Council is asked to review the two alignments. If there are no objections to the options as proposed, it would be my recommendation to follow the steps outlined in Ron Bray's 1 WSBI letter, which is attached. Ron Bray is a traffic engineer at WSB that has considerable experience working with MN/DOT on similar projects. Under his proposal, our next step would be to conduct a public information meeting to gather additional input on the two basic alignments. This meeting would be conducted jointly by the City and MN/DOT. Supporting Data: Copy of study; Letter from Ron Bray; Letter from Terry Humbert, MN/DOT. Hwv2"WN); 4117/N Apr -16-96 12:43P MSB S ASSOC. INC - Mweach Dgwtm nt of TrarlapMuldon ObUlct 3 3725 12th S1 N P.O. Box 370 St. ClouO. MN 56302 April 9, 1996 Chula A. Lepsk, P.E. OSM & Assocites 300 Park Place East 5775 Wayum Blvd. Ivlinnespolis, MN 55416-1228 612 541-1700 Re: State T H. 25 Improvement in the City of Monticello Dear Mr. LcpaL Tel, 6121255-4181 Fax: 612/ 255.3757 Toll Free. 1/ 800! 657.3961 I have reviewed the "Feasibility Report for the State T.H. 25 Improvements and Chelsea Road Emersion" and have the following cornments to offer: • The median closure at Oakwood Drive, as shown, would be an important element in improving the traffic operations in the vicinity of the 1-94 ramps. • Page 8 of the report lists the projected daily tragic at the south city limits to be 12.000 vehicles per day. Since the 1994 traffic Dow map is showing 9,200 vehicles per day, the projection may be low. • The need and/or the amount of aerie required at Marvin Road and Dundas Road should be reviewed. Given tho wetland on the west side of T.H. 25 and the Cedar Strut frontage road on the east ode, neither access appears necessary. • The transition for two to four lanes needs to be Atrthu reviewed to ensure that the merges and diverges aro done in a safe mariner. • The potential right of way needs Wong T.H. 25 teed to be detertnined as soon as possible. The project schedule u outlined in the report is ambitious. Potential right of way w4uituiom along TR 25 could have a significant impact on meeting the schedule. If you have any questions on the above concerns, please feel Ree to call me at (320) 654-SS20 Sincerely, -',, 4 ... 0-A--- Tertme ). Humbert District Planning Engineer cc: Brett Wein - WSB M "Ut oppawrtty Ww" AECEIVE� p1l 1 t 1996 WSg 8, ASSOCIATES P.U3 Apr -16-96 12:43P MSB & ASSOC. INC. 612 641-17OU P.04 a - BA Mi td—dl. PY 350 Westwood Lake 0111ce Rin A. Q/ein. P.F. 8441 WayzataNPenn Q/dln�bd PSMinneM 55426 ,n,apolis, MN 55428 L�l,l W k"""• P•L K—W e, Bray. P.L. 612-541.4800 &Auoriates, Inc. FAX 541.1700 To: Beef Weiss, AF-, City Engineer City ofMondcello From. Ronald E Bray, RE ,W WSB B Associates, Inc Date: AprilI, 1996 Re: CheLtta Road Extension - C&y Project Na 96 -NC Trunk Highway 25 and CR II71nVroventents Monticello. Wright County, Minnesota Ibc following is a public invntvemcnt/dcvclopment schedule proposed as per your request. A. City Council Meeting ............. . ...................... April 22. 1996 1. Prcscnt altcmatives and feasibility study to the City Council, along with Mn/1X'I' comments. B. Mailing/Newspaper Article ......................... Week ul'April 29, 1996 1, Send information and schedule to property owners in pmjcct area along with news rcicasc in Monticello Times. C. Chamber of Commerce Meeting ............................. May 16. 1996 1. Attend Chamber of Cummeme Meeting at Nowt and discuss transportutiun issues and Chelsea Roed(M 25 Improvements. V. Public Infomtaticm Meeting • Open Housc ..................... May 16, 1996 1. l told public information meeting from 3:00 to 8:00 P.M. with no formal presentation » gather comments on alternatives •• handout with altcrnutives and schedule information. lefiadnrhlre • Ergieren • ph2mm LQUALIy"MOTV FW11MJ ,'••I•nvl`wnw;l.�rwe •u D Apr -16-96 12:43P WSB 8 ASSOC. INC. 612 541-1700 P.05 `L Bret Weiss, P.E.. City Engineer City of Monticello, MN April 4, 1996 Page 2 E. Individual Ausiness Owner Meetings ................. April 3 - June 21. 1996 1. Meet with owners to discuss proposed improvements on an individual hasib and gather comments on possible impacts/concemwUncfrts. F. City Council Mceting..................................... June 24. 1996 I. Present public comments to City Council, along with preferred alternative lbr review. G. Second Public Informational Meeting - Open House ............. July 19, 1996 1. Hold informational meeting to present preferred alternative to public - formal D presentation at 7:00 P.M. with qucbtion & answer period to follow -- open house from 5:00 to 7:00 P.M. Note: Could combine with City Council if Public Hearing required for assessment. Please offer me your comments and suggestions on this prupusal. 1 will also coordinate with MWW*I'. V Jcff O'Neill, City of Monticello Al COUNCIL. UPDATE April 18, 1896 Proposal by Post Of£ sandivision . (R.W.) As you may recall, the City has an ordinance that requires the cluster mailbox concept to be used in all new subdivisions. In some areas such as Par West, Meadow Oak, and Cardinal Hills, the cluster concept has been met by the use of 16 - unit keyed mailboxes that have been supplied by the Postal Service. These boxes provided uniformity to neighborhoods but require the postal carrier to get out of his vehicle and insert the mail into each box from the rear of the structure. Each unit is separately keyed, providing additional security for the users. Mr. Jack Hutchinson, Postmaster, has commented to me in the past that these mailboxes are more costly for the Postal Service to operate because of the fact that the locks have to be changed each time a customer changes and because it's more time consuming for the carriers to deposit mail, as they have to get out of their vehicles to do so. In addition, neighbors have not been doing an adequate job of keeping the mailboxes clear, and Mr. Hutchinson would like to eliminate their use in Monticello. While the City doesn't have an ordinance requiring the Post Office to supply cluster boxes, if the Post Office proceeds with its threat to eliminate them all, we could have a problem in trying to make sure that all residents continue to use the cluster box concept. The problem will eventually be that it may be difficult to get 16 individuals to go together to help share in the cost of constructing now mailbox standards that have some sort of uniformity and yet can still be reasonably attractive. What we certainly don't want to see is everybody putting up their own mailbox and post, even if they are clustered together but each one architecturally different than the other. On the other hand, I don't believe the City has the authority to demand that the Post Office continue to leave the clustered units in each subdivision since they were the ones that actually supplied the units to begin with. Attached is a copy of a letter that the Post Office recently mailed to approximately 300 customers indicating that by July 1996, the boxes will be removed. Since this letter was mailed, the Post Office has received numerous phone calls from citizens who were upset with the fact that the Post Office planned on removing their lock boxes. Ideally, the more pressure that postal customers put on the Post Office to leave the boxes, the better off we will probably be if we want to continue W promote the cluster concept. As an alternative, if the Post Office goes through with its proposal to remove the boxes, the question becomes whether the City should set a minimum standard we want the neighbors to use when replacing their mailboxes and what standard would that be? Ma1,114 .uru: WIN% Page t What has been used with reasonable success in some subdivisions, including the Citys Eastwood Knoll and also within the Oak Ridge plat, is a 68 unit mailbox structure that is made out of cedar material. Each structure is uniform in design and is more attractive than if everyone tried to construct their own mailbox. Whether we want to dictate this type of design is ultimately the question, or whether we should just continue to inform everyone who inquires that we won't set a design but we do expect them to be clustered, and we will not allow individual mailboxes at each residence. If the Council has more time at the end of the meeting, you may want to discuss this subject in further detail. MAIL wx.uro; uiwm Page 2 V2UNITEUSTAIES FOS IAL SERVICE v DEAit PIISTAL LUS711MM, STARTING ON MAY 151Ii,1996 YOUR HAIL UNIT MALL HE 1010w. YOU WILL HAVE TO I(M'ME IT 114 111E iMIE PUMA NI'111 A It ZULAII NAIL WX IVAT YfRI WILL HAVE TO tSUY AT 1)IE I IUMAVE SIUM. 11IIS IS i3EING DUNE UU;AU5K OF 11M CDST OE MAlNfENAME AND UPKEEP. YOU WILL HAVE UNI'Jll 111E 11115 ' UP JULY 1996 TO IIAVG 11115 BOX UI'.AS NEIGIIUURS YOU WILL HAVE TO (XI' g 1=1111% AND i1tl' UP A MAIL llUX RACK I'IM YOUR NAIL WXI•S. '17Hs I'iAVt )N TV CALL 13 MIKE -Nr -295-0117 AND 11H Hitt. 111JAI YOU. ^ iU5'itIA;+I'Lli I1UNI'tCM;IJ�O ',JA �C ""► K '�T.4HUM 111M,11 Il. t a /•Y 71.t.' S/tit JJ.+i n 1 I rol)