Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 04-28-1997AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL. Monday, April 28, 1997 - 7 p.m. Mayor. Bill Fair Council Members: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1997.,, f C Ik 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. 4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. 5. Consent agenda. A. Consideration of approval of final plat and development agreement Prairie West Second Addition. g 1 B. Consideration of ordering a feasibility study on road, sanitary sewer, ;i water main, storm sewer, and roadway improvements associated with N the proposed Chelsea Road alignment between Wright County Road 117 and Cedar Street. lC� Consideration of calling for a special meeting with Monticello Township to discuss urbanization plan modifications. D. Consideration of approving Monticello Knights of Columbus 116825 application to operate a gambling license at Comfort Inn. E 1 Consideration of granting an extension to carnival permit for Monticello Mall Merchants Association. F. Consideration of Arbor Day Proclamation and observance for Friday, April 25, 1997. 6. Consideration of items removed from tt ho consent agenda for discussion. 7. Public hearing on adoption of proposed assessment roll for delinquent utility I' bills and certification of assessment roll to County Auditor. Agenda Monticello City Council April 28, 1997 Page 2 8. Consideration of a request for a reduction in building permit fees previously paid—Glen Posusta. 9. Consideration of increasing sanitary sewer access fee. 10. Consideration of appointing Wright County Soil and Conservation District (WCSC) as the authority administering wetland protection laws in the city of Monticello. Consideration of Change Order No. 2 for City Project i93.14C (wastewater treatment plant expansion). 12. Consideration of bills for the last half of April, 1997. 13. Adjournment. Cv� sVk MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, April 14,1897 - 7 pin. Members Present: Bill Fair, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen Members Absent: None Approval of in urns of h gLl_ar meeting held March 24_ 1997, Councilmember Brian Stumpf requested that the motion to approve the minutes be changed to seconded by Bruce Thielen. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROGER CARLSON AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO ACCEPT THE AMENDMENT TO THE MINUTES. Motion carried unanimously. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD MARCH 24, 1997, AS AMENDED. Motion carried unanimously. A. Mayor Fair requested that an update on the River Terrace Trailer Park flood be added to the end of the agenda. B. Public Works Director John Simola reported that staff s recommendation for item bF on the consent agenda is to accept the low bid from Al Berg Water Services in the amount of $5,721. 4. ri ize a eorningntalpatifinng rr unsts. and complaintA, A. Monticello resident Nerve Barker noted her concern regarding the traffic speed on Broadway and the placement of school zone signs. It was her view that nnore speeding tickets should be issued by the Sheriffs Department, and the school zone signs should be placed well in advance of the school buildings rather than near the school driveways. Assistant Administrator Jeff O'Neill explained that the Monticello Community Partners (MCP) is studying the downtown area, including traffic on Broadway. Once the MCP's plan is complete, it will he forwarded to the Planning Commission for review. Pago 1 9 Council Minutes - 4114/97 After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to forward Barker s concerns to the Police Commission for review. B. Dan Goeman, Goeman Realty, requested that Council make a motion to re -open item #7 for public hearing and discussion regarding an amendment to the urban service area boundaries. Goeman noted that a new school referendum was passed to deal with upcoming growth, and housing is needed to help the community retain important businesses and services in the area. The development proposed by Orrin Thompson would provide necessary housing, would provide fees to help pay for the wastewater treatment plant debt, and the new families would help share in the tax burden. Mayor Fair thanked Goeman for his comments and noted that this issue would be discussed under item #7 of the agenda. C. Don Januszewski of River Terrace Park asked when they would be able to move back into their homes and why they were not given more notice of evacuation. Mayor Fair stated that residents were evacuated quickly due to the flooding of the wells and sanitary sewer at the park, which became a public safety concern. City staff has been directed to evaluate the sewer system and well contamination and a report would be forthcoming by the end of the week. He noted that an update on the flood situation would be given later in the meeting. D. Captain Arden Roen, Minnesota National Guard, invited the Council, City staff, and residents to the "Meet the Guard" presentation at 10 a.m. on April 19, 1997, at the Monticello High School. The presentation will show the air defense training, systema, and programs used by the Guard. Bill Fair welcomed Captain Roen and the National Guard to the community and encouraged the public to attend the flag raising. Consent agenda. A. diLonnl Lpe permit to sillow three or more 6 gin ss aigpw on n commercial hudding ni 112 West Broadway D i wnt- Karen Schneider. Remmmendation: Approve the conditional use permit to allow three or more business signs at 112 West Broadway as illustrated by the sign plan submitted, subject to the following conditions: 1. All signs 1br tenants shall be consistent in design, material, shape, and method of illumination; and Page 2 CO -L) Council Minutes - 4/14/97 Prior to making any alteration of signs, sign location, sign size, or number of signs, the building owner shall submit an application and revised sign plan to the City and receive an amendment to this conditional use permit. B. Congideration of appain gn nt to RDA. Recommendation: Appoint Darrin Lahr to the EDA, with a term expiration of December 1997. C. t •on_aideration of npproving enntrihutian to MCP from the Legion Chib. Recommendation: Approve the contribution of $300 to the MCP matching the contribution received from the American Legion Club. D. Co aid ration of ssis Ant Linuor Sure Manager aiprrointment. Recommendation: Appoint Michael Fischbach as Assistant Liquor Store Manager at grade 6, step 2. E. rnnsqdPratqnn of a resolution dmignnfiner representative authorized to execute isaa er asB'a an App i a io a. Recommendation: Adopt the resolution authorizing City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller to execute all subgrant agreements to obtain federal assistance for snow removal costa incurred during January 1997. SEE RESOLUTION 97.13. F. Review of bids for reftirbiAhrnPntnf deep well #2-CityProUect 97-02C. and en aid ration of award. Recommendation: Award the bid for refurbishment of deep well q2, Project 97-02C, to the low bidder, Al Berg Water Services of Elk River, at a cost of $5,721. G. Con_aideration of purchase of new paint striper for street ftsirtooprit. Recommendation: Authorize the purchase of a new paint striper firom Earl F. Anderson for the GM 3500 Line Lazer Paint Striper at a cost of $3,993.75, and authorize the public works department to advertise the old paint striper for sale. H. Consideration of pur hnae of farm disk for hioso ids fa 'lit , Recommendation: Purchase the used John Deere 220 disk firom Scharber & Sons of Rogers for $5,500. I. Cnnsiderallon of finnl pnvment on C rdinnl Hills 4th Addition. Proiert 94-01C - RP lltilities. Recommendation: Authorize final payment to RP Utilities in the amount of $26,834.50 upon receipt of all final lien waivers, etc. Paso 3 Council Minutes - 4/14/97 �p J. Consideration of change order N1 and final payment on Project 46-02C. �L Mein Farms - Ryan .on racting. Recommendation: Approve change order #I in the amount of $18,256.75 and authorize final payment to Ryan Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $93,929.01. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS RECOMMENDED. Motion Carried unanimously. Co aid ra ion of i Pmg removed from thp cogent agenda for diutission. None. Co aid ra .ion of a reeorrimpndation by the Planning Commigsion to reconsider dpnial of extension of Urban Service Area. At their April 1, 1997, meeting, at the request of Planting Commission Chair Dick Frie, the Planning Commission reviewed the March 24 Council discussion and action regarding the urbanization plan boundary amendments requested by Art Anderson and Orrin Thompson. After review, the Planning Commission found that the City Council did not have a clear understanding of the Planning Commission recommendation when making its decision on March 24. Therefore, the Planning Commission requested that the item be reconsidered. The Planning Commission went on to clarify its position by recommending that the City Council reconsider the denial for extension of the urban service area and annexation of the properties. Mayor Fair stated that in order to reconsider the issue of amending the Urban Service Area boundaries, one of the Council members who voted to deny the amendment must make a motion to reconsider, however, if the item is to be reconsidered, it should be tabled until the next Council meeting to allow for public notification. Councilmember Brian Stumpf suggested that a committee of Council, Planning Commission, and Township Board members discuss the entire Urban Servioe Area. Councilmember Bruce Thielen noted that he would be uncomfortable moving the Urban Service boundaries for one developer; however, he was agreeable to a committee reviewing the entire Urban Service Area, with the understanding there would be no guarantee that the boundaries would be amended. Page 4 Council Minutes - 4/14/97 ? AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND u SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO RECONSIDER THE MOTION TO DENY AMENDMENT TO THE URBAN SERVICE AREA REASON FOR RECONSIDERATION IS THAT THE URBAN SERVICE BOUNDARIES WERE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED TOO NARROWLY AND SHOULD BE REVIEWED FROM AN OVERALL PERSPECTIVE. Voting in favor: Bruce Thielen, Brian Stumpf, Bill Fair, Roger Carlson. Opposed: Clint Herbst. Motion passed. A MOTION WAS THEN MADE BY MAYOR BILL FAIR AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO SCHEDULE A MEETING WITHIN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND TOWNSHIP BOARD TO DISCUSS THE ENTIRE URBAN SERVICE AGREEMENT. MAYOR FAIR THEN AMENDED HIS MOTION TO STATE THAT WITHIN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS A DATE SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN ONE MONTH FROM APRIL 14 WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND TOWNSHIP BOARD TO DISCUSS THE ENTIRE URBAN SERVICE AGREEMENT. THE AMENDMENT WAS SECONDED BY ROGER CARISON. Voting in favor: Bill Fair, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen. Opposed: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf It was Stumpf s view that a committee should be established to review the Urban Service Area rather than all members of each board. Motion passed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO POSTPONE ACTION ON RECONSIDERATION OF THE ORRIN THOMPSON AND ART ANDERSON REQUESTS FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE URBAN SERVICE BOUNDARIES UNTIL AFTER THE COUNCIL MEETS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND TOWNSHIP BOARD. Motion carried unanimously. Assistant Administrator Jeff O'Neill reported that a group of citizens who have participated in meetings regarding the proposed National Guard Community and Training Center is requesting that Council consider creating a task force to define community needs and establish a potential program for a partnership with the National Guard. It was the view of the group that sufficient commitment was expected from the National Guard and sufficient potential benefit to the community existed to justify the request. Council discussed the School District's involvement and/or possible participation in the pNject. Mayor Fair explained that part of what the task force would address would be the intent of the School District, and it was likely that the task force would include School representatives. He also noted that the task force would need to identify tasks and resources needed, and then the Council Pago 5 (2) Council Minutes - 4/14/97 could establish a budget for accomplishing those tasks. Final decisions regarding the community center, however, would be made by the City Council. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO ESTABLISH A TASK FORCE, NOT TO EXCEED 13 MEMBERS, TO IDENTIFY TASKS AND RESOURCES NEEDED TO ESTABLISH A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE NATIONAL GUARD REGARDING A TRAINING/COMMUNITY CENTER, AND RETURN TO COUNCIL FOR DISCUSSION. Motion carried unanimously. It was the consensus of Council that the task force could be made up of representatives from the City Council, School Board, HRA, County, MCP, National Guard, and Monticello Township. Councilmembers Bruce Thielen and Bill Fair volunteered to represent the City Council on the task force. Thielen and Fair will meet with City staff to discuss representation on the task force. 9. Review of bid_a for contract moor' .+d o Rid ra .ion of aw rd of contract. Public Works Director John Simola reported that two bids were received for contract mowing services, one from Steve's Lawn & Snow of Otsego, and one from Carefree Lawn Service of Monticello. Based upon previous years' services of 22 mowings per year and fall cleanup at the liquor store, library, and fire hall; and 6 mowings and spring and fall cleanup at Riverside Cemetery, the total annual value contract would be lower with Steve's Lawn & Snow at $7,648 per year. Carefree Lawn Service's cost would be $7,950. Simola went on to explain that the bid extension was based on six mowings per year at Riverside Cemetery, which was the number of mowings contracted for previously by the Masons. However, the grass sometimes gets quite long between mowings, and Council may want to consider increasing the number of moorings at the Riverside Cemetery. If Council increased the number of mowings to 12 times per year, Carefree Lawn Service's annual contract would be slightly less than Steve's Lawn & Snow, $11,100 vs. $11,148. Simola also suggested that Council consider increasing grave prices to generate the necessary revenue to support increased maintenance of the cemetery. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO INCREASE THE LEVEL OF SERVICE TO A MINIMUM OF 12 MOWINGS PER YEAR FOR RIVERSIDE CEMETERY AND AWARD THE MOWING CONTRACT TO CAREFREE LAWN SERVICE BASED ON AN ANNUAL LOW PRICE OF $11,100. Motion carried unanimously. Page 6 0 Council Minutes - 4/14197 City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller reported that the Wright County Board of Commissioners recently allowed the City to acquire 15 lots in the Meadow Oak Estates subdivision that were being tax forfeited for non-payment of taxes and special assessments. Of the 15 lots, Wolfsteller suggested that 2 or 3 of the lots along Meadow Oak Lane be kept by the City for ponding in the Meadow Oak Estates development, and an additional lot would be used for entrance to the Eastwood Knoll development, which would result in 11 or 12 lots left for resale. He estimated that the lots would likely be appraised between $20,000 to $24,000 each. Wolfateller also noted that the City acquired approximately a 5 -acre parcel of land east of Cedar Street and north of Dundas Road south of the Silver Fox Motel area. It was recommended that the City hold this property until the adjacent area develops. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIIELEN AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO DIRECT STAFF TO OBTAIN A MARKET ANALYSIS ON THE PARCELS AND TO RESEARCH COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE LOTS AND RETURN TO COUNCIL FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION. Motion carried unanimously. :,,, .�. .., , 4. .[ N , , . Chief Building Official Fred Patch reported that information was prepared for the City Attorney requesting that a criminal complaint be initiated regarding a long -maintained, dangerous public nuisance and installation of a building contrary to agreements with the City and without a building permit; however, it was found that the City does not have a contract with the City Attorney which clearly defines the scope of services. The Wright County Attorney's office was also contacted, and staff was informed that their office does not prosecute such cases but typically prosecutes only those cases brought forward by the Wright County Sheriffs Department. In reviewing the City's contract with the Sheriffs Department, it was found that the contract specifically exempts all of the laws typically enforced by the Building Official. Patch requested that Council authorize City staff to work with the City Attorney to develop A contract for legal services according to the recommendation of the City Administrator to enable the City to prosecute cases involving laws enforced by the Building Official. Pago 7 0 Council Minutes - 4/14/97 City Attorney Paul Weingarden noted that previous Councils had not granted him authority to prosecute criminally. If given the discretion to prosecute either civilly or criminally, he would discuss it with the Chief Building Official. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BILL FAIR AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ATTORNEY TO CRIMINALLY PROSECUTE THOSE MATTERS THAT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY CANNOT HANDLE AND CIVILLY PROSECUTE OTHER CASES. The approach selected would be at the discretion of the City Attorney and City staff. Motion carried unanimously. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO APPROVE THE BILLS FOR THE FIRST HALF OF APRIL AS PRESENTED. Motion carried unanimously. 13. IternFi added to thp appn a. Mayor Bill Fair reported that a meeting was held on April 14 regarding the flood situation at River Terrace Trailer Park. Fred Patch was appointed as coordinator for occupancy of the park. Mayor Fair explained that problems encountered at the park included flooded lift stations, contaminated water, frozen pipes in some of the trailers, and contaminated private well and sewer systems for which no map can be provided for review. The Department of Health will need to inspect and approve the water and sewer systems, and NSP and Minnegasco will need to restart the systems in each home to avoid problems with leaking gas or dangerous electrical situations. It was estimated that residents may be able to re -occupy the park by the end of the week after further investigation by City staff. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Motion carried unanimously. Karen Doty Office Manager Page 8 9 Council Agenda • 4(28!97 Attached you will find a development agreement and associated disbursement agreement governing the Prairie West 2nd Addition planned unit development. The utilities for the site are being constructed within a city easement and will be maintained by the City. The roadways and storm sewer improvements are constructed privately and will be maintained by the association. The development agreement features a requirement that the developer provide funds on deposit in an amount equal to construct the utility systems maintained by the City, In addition, funds are on deposit to guarantee completion of landscaping improvements. The plat provides for a small public park on the west side of Otter Creek along the pathway. Development of this area will occur in 1997 with the help of the Parks Commission, State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Scientific and Natural Areae Program (SNA), the Fire Department, and community volunteeers. At the direction of the Parks Commission, the SNA is preparing a management plan for the area which includes a controlled bum and selective cutting of underbrush. The fire department will conduct the burn in early May, and students from the earth corp high school student group will assist by cutting back sumac and other undergrowth. Also, at some point assistance from public works will be needed to remove deadfall. Once the work is complete, picnic benches and a kiosk featuring information on native plants may be placed in the park. There has been some delay in the completion of the development agreement and final plat. A large part of the delay has been due to disagreement between the City Engineer and the developer's engineer over the design of the storm water system and the water system. It appears that design issues have been resolved, and therefore the plat and development agreement are ready for approval. However, there may be additional modifications to the plan that may be necessary prior to placement of City signatures on the plat. Motion to approve final plat and development agreement for the Prairie West 2nd Addition. Approval and final signature on the plat is subject to approval by the Wright County Engineer of the design of the access to CSAH 75. Final approval is also subject to final review and approval of utility system design by the City Engineer. Council Agenda - 4/28/97 2. Motion to deny approval of the final plat and development agreement for the Prairie West 2nd Addition. C. STAFF PrO MFNDATION: The City Administrator recommends alternative N1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Development agreement and disbursement agreement; Final plat. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT r PRAIRIE WEST SECOND ADDMON (Exhibit B to Prairie West Second Addition Disbursement Agreement) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 28th day ofAprll, 1897, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Minnesota (the "City"), and Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc., (the "Developer"). RR(:ITAi R: WHEREAS, City has granted final approval to a plat known as Prairie West Second Addition Planned Unit Development (the "Subdivision"), said land legally described as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof ('Property"), which Subdivision shall consist of 6 twinhomes and two 4plex residential units and Outlets 21 and 22; and WHEREAS, Developer intends to construct, install, provide for and maintain PRIVATE streets, drainage improvements, signs, PUBLIC sanitary sewer and water in accordance with the plans and specifications as hereinafter described, all at the sole cost and expense of Developer; and WHEREAS, the City has by resolution adopted April 28, 1997, granted final approval to the Subdivision and the improvements contemplated herein provided that the Developer enter into the within Agreement and that Developer faithfully perform the terns and conditions contained herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Pat las❑ea. The Developer agrees that the Subdivision shall be developed in accordance with the following exhibits attached hereto which aro hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. The exhibits are: Exhibit A -- Final Plat Exhibit B •- Protective Covenants/Association Incorporation The abovo•referenced documents must be executed in accordance with City and County ordinances and filed in the office of the Wright County Recorder at Developer's expense no later than Prior to the commencement of construction, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 19(b), Developer must pay to City all outstanding expenses incurred by CCity for platting and other development purposes, including but not limited to, engineering, legal, and other professional staff fees. PRAIRIE2.AOR 4/2N7 57 A& Page I 2. Represpritationg of Developer. As inducement to the City's approval of the Subdivision and entering into this Agreement, the Developer hereby represents and warrants to the City: a. That the Developer is the fee owner of the Property and has authority to enter into this Agreement. b. That the intended use of the property is for a common interest community consisting of twinhome and 4-plex residential units. C. That the Subdivision complies with all city, county, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to, wetland regulation protection, City subdivision ordinances and zoning ordinances, to the best of Developer's knowledge. d. That to the best of Developer's knowledge, the Subdivision does not require an Environmental Assessment Worksheet or an Environmental Impact Statement, but shall pay for the preparation of the same if required to do so by City or other governmental entity and shall reimburse City for all expenses incurred by City in connection with the preparation, including staff time and attorneys fees. 3. I)PvP1nper Improvements. The Developer agrees it shall construct, install, and maintain certain public and private improvements, which shall include sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main improvements, roadway, grading, landscaping and drainage improvements ("Developer Improvements") on the Property, at Developer's sole cost and expense, in accordance with the following exhibits incorporated as if fully set forth herein: Exhibit C -- Grading/Development and Utility Plans Exhibit C1-- Landscaping Plan Developer agrees the Developer Improvements shall be performed in accordance with the plans, specifications, and preliminary engineering reports approved or to be approved by the City Engineer and the City prior to commencement of construction and thereafter, in accordance with all City rules, regulations, ordinances, and the requirements of this Agreement, which shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Private street grading, graveling, surfacing and stabilizing which shall include curbs, gutter, and driveway approaches. b. Private storm sower facilities including all necessary catch basins, and appurtenances, Public and private water main, including all appurtenances. PRAIRIMAGR 4/25197 6066 Pape 2 Public and private sanitary sewer, including all appurtenances. T(f e. Establishment of at least two post office cluster box stands and boxes with groups of six or more. 4. Permits. Upon execution of this Agreement, Developer and other necessary parties shall promptly apply for all permits, approvals, licenses, or other documents from any and all necessary governmental agencies (which may include the City, Wright County, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Health, Army Corps of Engineers, and DNR) so as to enable Developer to construct the Developer Improvements as herein contemplated. Developer shall use its best efforts to obtain the same as soon as reasonably possible. No grading or building permit shall be issued by City unless the plans or application are in conformity with the City comprehensive plan, this Agreement, and all local, state and federal regulations. The City shall, within fifteen (lb) days of receipt of plans, review such submittal to determine whether the foregoing requirements have been met. If the City discerns said plans or applications are deficient, it shall notify the Developer in writing stating the deficiencies and the steps necessary for correction. Issuance of a grading or building permit by City shall be a conclusive determination that the plans or applications have been approved as to the requested activity by Developer and satisfies the provisions of this section. The City may issue building permits prior to City acceptance of the Developer Improvements provided that the party applying for the building permit agrees to withhold requests for occupancy until necessary Developer Improvements have been installed, which include operational and tested sewer and water systema, or appropriate escrow sum to ensure compliance, at City's discretion, and roadway development. Until developer improvements are completed, no dwelling may be occupied on either a temporary or permanent basis, except that model homes may be occupied by sales personnel for marketing and related purposes. Notwithstanding this provision, if the Developer is in default of this Agreement as hereinafter defined, in addition to any other remedy provided by this Agreement, City may refuse to issue a building permit or certificate of occupancy for any lot or parcel in the Subdivision until Developer cures the default as provided herein. ti, Pro- .nna .+action Activi i s, The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a pro -construction meeting with City, private utilities, and contractor to review a proposed schedule for construction of the Developer Improvementa. g, ( nnurioncemynt of rongruction of Dov Inppr Improvements, Upon obtaining all necessary governmental approvals, licenses, and permits, subject to Unavoidable Delays, Developer shall commence construction of the Developer Improvements within ten (10) days f}om the execution of this document. PRAIRIE2.AOR. 412618 67ACe Papp 3 11 7. Faithful Performance of Conatr„ction of Puhtie Improv�. Developer shall install, construct, and maintain the Developer Improvements in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Developer guarantees and warrants the workmanship and materials respecting such Developer Improvements for a period of one year following City's acceptance of the same ("Guarantee Period-). The Developer shall repair or replace, as directed by the City and at the Developer's sole cost and expense, public improvements or landscaping that becomes defective, in the sole opinion of the City or its Engineer, within said Guarantee Period even though notice thereof be given by City after said Guarantee Period. The Developer, or Developer's contractors, shall post maintenance bonds or other security acceptable to City to secure these warranties. 8. Impeetion of lmprovements. Developer authorizes the City Inspector or City -authorized inspector and City Engineer to inspect construction of the Developer Improvements on a full-time basis and grants to them a license to enter the Subdivision to perform all necessary duties and/or inspections deemed appropriate during the construction of the improvements until final certification of acceptance is approved by City and expiration of any applicable warranty period. Developer shall cause its contractor to furnish City with a schedule of proposed operations at least five (5) days prior to the commencement of the construction of each Developer Improvement. The City shall inspect all such work items during and after construction for compliance with approved specifications and ordinance requirements. 9. Acceptance of nevelep re Improvements. Upon notification by Developer that any of the Public Developer Improvements have been completed, City Engineer shall inspect the Public Developer Improvement and, at his sole discretion, determine if the Public Development Improvements) has been completed in accordance with the plans, specifications, and exhibits attached hereto. If the City Engineer determines that the Public Developer Improvement has been completed in accordance with all requirements, the City Engineer shall give the Developer written notice of acceptance within seven (7) days effective as of the date of the inspection. If the City Engineer determines that the Public Developer Improvemenus) is not completed in accordance with said requirements, the City Engineer shall notify Developer in writing of the deficiency and provide a reasonable date upon which to cure the deficiency. Failure by the Developer to cure within the stated time period shall constitute an Event of Default. PRAIRIV AOR: 1/2M 57#0 Pape 4 10. Comph-tion of Developer Improvements. Developer agrees to complete the Developer Improvements on or before . The Completion Date as provided herein is subject to Unavoidable Delays as hereinafter defined, in which event the completion date may be extended by the period of such Unavoidable Delays. For the purpose of this section, Unavoidable Delays mean delays which are caused by strikes, fire, war, road weight restrictions, material shortages, weather that renders construction progress impossible, causes beyond the Developers control or other casualty to the Developer Improvements, or the act of any federal, state, or local government unit, except those acts of the City authorized or contemplated by this Agreement. In the event Developer believes an extension is warranted, Developer shall request such extension in writing to the City Engineer within 7 days of the occurrence of the unavoidable delay and specify the requested length of extension and the reason therefore. The City Engineer shall determine the length of the extension, if any, in his sole discretion. 11. Ownership of PahLc Improvements. Upon the completion of the Public Improvements required to be constructed by this Agreement, and the acceptance thereof by the City, the public sanitary sewer and water main lying within the public easements as shown on the Subdivision plat shall become City property without further notice or action. Within thirty days thereafter, and before any security as herein required is released, Developer shall supply City with a complete set of reproducible "RECORD DRAWINGS" and "DEVELOPMENT PLAN" plans in a form acceptable to the City Engineer, without charge to City, which documents shall become the property of City. 12. Cleanup. The Developer shall properly clear any soil, earth, or debris on City -owned property or public right-of-way resulting from construction work by the Developer, its agents, or assigns, 13. Frosion and nrniaagLCDnftd. The Developer shall provide and comply with erosion and drainage control plan requirements as described in Exhibit C and as otherwise required by City. As development progresses, the City may impose additional erosion and drainage control requirements if, in the sole opinion of the City Engineer, they would be useful and appropriate in controlling drainage and erosion. Developer shall promptly comply with such erosion and drainage control plans and with such additional instructions it receives from City. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. 14. Hold Harmless Agreement. For the purposes of this paragraph 16, "Developer" includes the Prairie West Association to be formed pursuant to Exhibit B. PRAIRIE2 AOR. 4rM7 67K Page 5 Developer acknowledges that failure to control erosion in accordance with the plans and exhibits as contained herein may cause flooding and/or damage to adjoining property owners. In such event, Developer agrees to hold City harmless and indemnify City from claims of all third parties or by Developer for damages arising out of such flooding and/or damages. The parties recognize that in emergency situations, time is of the essence in preventing damage to persons and to property. In the event of an emergency situation requiring immediate action to prevent loss or damage to persons or property, to be determined at the sole discretion of City, the notice and cure provisions of paragraph 20 shall not apply and City is authorized to undertake any corrective action it deems necessary to prevent or minimize any such flooding and/or damage. In such event, Developer agrees to hold City harmless and indemnify City from claims of all third parties, or by Developer, for damages arising out of said corrective action by City, and agrees to reimburse City for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by City arising out of the corrective action, whether performed within or without designated easement areas, including but not limited to any costs necessary to re -landscape disrupted soils located within the Subdivision. lb. Insurance. a. The Developer will provide and maintain or cause to be !� maintained at all times during the process of constructing the Developer Improvements until six (6) months after acceptance of all Developer Improvements and, from time to time at the request of the City, furnish with proof of payment of premiums on: Comprehensive general liability insurance (including operations, contingent liability, operations of subcontractors, completed operations and contractual liability insurance) together with an Owner's Contractor's Policy with limits against bodily injury, including death, and property damage (to include, but not be limited to damages caused by erosion or flooding) which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of any of its subcontractors. Limits for bodily injury or death shall not be less than $600,000.00 for one person and $1,000,000.00 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall not be less than $200,000.00 for each occurrence. Tho City, City Engineer and Developer's Engineer shall be an additional ruined insured on said policy. Developer shall file a copy of the insurance coverago with the City upon request. PRAIRIE? AOR: 4*5Q7 �� Papp 6 2) Worker's compensation insurance, with statutory coverage. 16. Security for Coat of Improvements. For the purpose of financing the construction, installation and maintenance of the public sanitary sewer, water system, and grading and private landscaping improvements, Developer has executed and delivered to Bank ("Lender') a Note and Mortgage encumbering the property in an amount not less than 3 . The proceeds of this loam shall be escrowed by Lender and disbursed only in accordance with the terms and conditions of a certain Disbursement Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated by reference herein. No work shall be commenced under this Agreement until the Note. 1_blortgraae and Diabir_sement Agreement has been executed and conformed copies filed with City. 17. Respgngihility for Costa. a. The Developer shall pay all coats incurred by it or City in connection with the development of the Subdivision, including but not limited to construction of Developer Improvements, legal, planning, engineering, and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the Subdivision plat, the preparation of this Agreement, and all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the Subdivision, including reasonable attorneys fees in the event City undertakes enforcement of this Agreement by the City. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City within thirty (30) days atter receipt, If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work until the bills are paid in full. 18. Prohihicining ABainat AaRignm n . of AgmArrignt. Developer represents and agrees that (except for associating with other individuals or entities), prior to the completion of the Developer Improvements as certified by the City; e. Except only by way of security for, and only for the purpose of obtaining financing necessary to enable the Developer or any successor in interest to the Property, or any part thereof, to perform its obligations with respect to the construction of the Developer Improvements under this Agreement, and any other purpose authorized by this Agreement, the Developer (except as so authorized) will not make or create, or aulfer to be made or C created, any total or partial sale, assignment, conveyance, or transfer in any other mode or form of with respect to this PRAIRIE? AGR; 4128/87 IT +G Pape 7 Agreement or any interest therein, or any contract or agreement to do any of the same, without the prior written approval of (� City. In the absence of specific written agreement by the City to the contrary, no such transfer or approval by City shall be deemed to relieve Developer from any of its obligations. In the event that City approves a substitute developer and the Property is transferred to said substitute, the City agrees to relieve the Developer of liability from performance as described in this contract. Said substitute shall assume all responsibilities and rights of the Developer under this contract. 19. EventL of lWault Defined. The following shall be "Events of Default" under this Agreement and the term "events of default" shall mean, whenever it is used in this Agreement (unless the context otherwise provides), any one or more of the following events: a. Failure by the Developer to observe and substantially perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed hereunder, after written notice to the Developer as provided in this Agreement. b. If the Developer shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, or shall file a petition in bankruptcy, or shall make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or shall consent to the appointment of a receiver of itself or of the whole or any substantial part of the property. C. If the Developer shall file a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws. d. If the Developer is in default under the Mortgage and has not entered into a work-out agreement with the Lender. e. The Developer shall, after commencement of the construction of the Developer Improvements, default in or violate its obligations with respect to the construction of the same (including the nature and the date for the completion thereof), or shall abandon or substantially suspend construction work, and such act or actions is not due to Unavoidable Delays and any such default, violation, abandonment, or suspension shall not be cured, ended, or remedied within the time provided for in this Agreement. PRAIRIE2 ADR 4/2597 66 k page s 20. Natie/Remedi a nn Default Whenever any Event of Default occurs, the City shall give written notice of the Event of Default to Developer by United States mail at its last known address. If the Developer fails to cure the Event of Default within fifteen (15) days of the date of mailed notice, in addition to any other remedy provided in this Agreement, and without waiver of any such right, City may avail itself of any or all of the following remedies: a. Halt all plat development work and construction of Developer Improvements. b. Refuse to issue building permits or occupancy permits as to any parcel until such time as the Event of Default is cured. C. Apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin continuation of the Event of Default. d. Exercise any and all remedies available to City pursuant to the Disbursement Agreement. If the Event of Default is the failure of Developer to complete, construct, install, or correct the Developer Improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications and this Agreement, City may perform the construction or work and apply to Lender pursuant to the Disbursement Agreement to reimburse City for its expenses. This provision shall be a license granted by the Developer to the City to act, but shall not require the City to take any such action. Developer consents to such action by City and waives any claim Developer may have against City for damages in the event City exercises its rights in accordance with this provision. Terminate this Agreement by written notice to Developer at which time all terms and conditions as contained herein shall be of no further force and effect and all obligations of the parties as imposed hereunder shall be null and void. a. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors or assigns, as the case may be. b. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of his Agreement. PRAIRIMOR. 4/M? ��� Page C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, (� amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the l parties, and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. d. Future residents of this Subdivision shall not be deemed to be third party beneficiaries of this Agreement. e. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the Developer, its successors and assigns. The Developer shall, at its expense, record this Agreement in the Office of the Wright County Recorder. After the Developer has completed the work required under this Agreement, at the Developer's request the City will execute and deliver to Developer a release in recordable form. f. All parties to this Agreement acknowledge they have been represented by counsel and have entered into this Agreement freely and voluntarily. g. Private park development. The Developer agrees to develop a private park adjacent to the creek for the enjoyment of the residents of the subdivision as Identified in Exhibit Cl. The design and characteristics of the private park shall be compatible with the design of a public park to be located on the opposite side (west) of Otter Creek as determined by the Monticello Parks Commission. The City agrees to assist the developer In completing park improvement by authorizing the fire department to conduct a controlled burn on the site In conjunction with a controlled burn on the adjacent public park area. The developer agrees to hold the City harmless for damage to trees resulting from the controlled burn. 22. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer or mailed to the Developer by United States mail, postage prepaid to the following address: 12420 Armitage Avenue NW, Monticello, MN 85362, or such other address es may be designated in writing from time to time. Notices to the City ahall be in writing and either hand delivered to the City Administrator or mailed to City by United States mail, postage prepaid to the address: City of Monticello, 250 East Broadway, PO Box 1147, Monticello, Minnesota 55362 PRAIRIE2 AGR. 4/2997 50A -V Pape 10 C it IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have signed this Developers Agreement the day and year first written above. CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY OF MONTICELLO William Fair Rick Wolfsteller Mayor City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 1997, by Mayor William Fair and by City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public CEDRUS CREEK CRAFTSMAN, INC. John Komarek President STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 1997, by John Komarek, the President of Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc., a corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation. PRAIRIE2 AGA 4PJ5197 Notary Public 9kK Pago tl C PRAIRIEZ.AOR, Q6107 0,Aj Lm:p&x A Final Plat On file at the offices of Monticello City Hall SA, L Pap 12 C err B Protective Covenants/Association Incorporation On file at the office of the Wright County Reoorder PRAIRIEZ AGR QM? GA -4 Pago 13 it PRAIRIE2.AOR: 4/25M7 Grading/Development and Utility Plans On file at the offices of WSB & Associates S*4 Pape 14 14 PRAIRIE2 AOR1/dSg7 .2.+.r.r.aa Cl Landscaping Plan On file at the offices of Monticello City Hall >33MBIT D CDisbursement Agreement PRAIRIE2.AOR• M"? SAPPape 16 AGREEMENT (� PRAIRIE WEST 2ND ADDITION (Exhibit D to Prairie West 2nd Addition Development Agreement) THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered on , by and between John Komarek of Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc. (Developer), First National Bank (Lender), and the City of Monticello, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation (City). WHEREAS, the Developer is the owner of the rear property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, commonly known as Prairie West 2nd Addition (Subdivision); WHEREAS, on , the Developer and the City made and entered into a Development Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B (Development Agreement), concerning the construction of certain improvements to the Subdivision as described therein (Public Developer Improvements); WHEREAS, on , the Developer and the Lender made and entered into a Loan Agreement (Loan Agreement), wherein the Lender agreed to loan the Sum of $ to the Developer for the purpose of construction of sanitary sewer, water main, private landscaping, and other related development costs; WHEREAS, on the Developer, as maker, executed and derived to the Lender, as payee, a promissory note in the sum of $ , with interest thereon payable on or before 19_, and said note was secured by a Mortgage executed and delivered by Developer, as mortgagor, to Lender, as mortgagee, encumbering the Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to establish procedures concerning the disbursement of funds under the Loan Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Oecwit t The City hereby accepts this Disbursement Agreement as Security for the construction of a portion of the Public Developer Improvements and private landscaping under the Development Agreement. The liability of the Lender to the City under this Disbursement Agreement shall automatically be reduced to the extent of advances made by the Lender under the Loan Agreement for the Developer Improvements, provided that said advances are approved in writing by the City. In the ovent of improper disbursement, Lender shall be liable to City for any damages arising from any improper disbursement up to the amount of such improper disbursement. PRAIRIMUSB; VM7 Pap I 2. Certification 4 neer. Private Engineer and City Engineer shall certify in writing to the Developer, the Lender, and City the progress of construction of the Developer Improvements at the conclusion of each stage of construction. Such certification shall set forth the quality of workmanship, the stage of construction according to the plans and specifications, the dollar amount of the Developer Improvements completed to the date of such certification, and the dollar amount of the disbursement necessary to pay for the certified Developer Improvements. 3. Approval by City. After receipt of the certification by the Private Engineer, the City shall give written notice to the Developer and the Lender whether the City approves or rejects the Developer Improvement relating to such certification. The City will use its best efforts to notify the Developer and Lender within ten (10) business days after receipt of such certification by the Private Engineer. Disb •*semento nnd Retainage, If the City approves a certification of the Developer Improvement by the Private Engineer in writing, the Lender may rely upon such approval and, if so instructed by the City, advance by check requiring signature of the Developer and City no more than ninety-five percent (95%) of the sum certified by the Private Engineer for the Developer Improvements. Five percent (6'%) of all certified sums of the Developer Improvements (Retainage) may be retained until the final inspection by the City. The Retainage shall be disbursed ninety-one (91) days after the City completes its final inspection and establishes a Completion Date. If the City rejects any item of the Developer Improvements in the certification by the Private Engineer, the Lender shall not advance any funds relating to that item of the Developer Improvements until the City has given its written consent. Certification not relating to Developer Improvements as referenced in the Development Agreement shall not require the 5% retainage pursuant to this paragraph. fspengion or Terrainntlan to CArtiflentlon by Private Pn neer The City may suspend or terminate the certification of the Developer Improvements by the Private Engineer. In such event, the City shall give written notice to the Developer and the Lender of such suspension or termination. Such suspension or termination shall not affect any certification issued by the Private Engineer prior to the receipt of such notice to all parties. Such suspension or termination shall be prospective only. In the event of such suspension or termination, the City shall inspect the Developer Improvements completed, certify to the Developer and the Lender the dollar amount of the Developer Improvements completed to the date of such certification, and the amount to be advanced to pay for the certified Developer Improvements. PRAIRI MB: 41M7 SIS Page 2 g, Final Ln gnection by the City, Pursuant to the Development Agreement, the City Engineer of the City shall make a final inspection of the Developer (� Improvements. The Private Engineer shall have no authority to make the final inspection on behalf of the City. The City Engineer may object to any construction defects discovered during the final inspection regardless of when such defects occurred. The failure of the City to object to a prior certification by the Private Engineer shall not be deemed a waiver of the City's right to demand the correction of any construction defects discovered during the final inspection. Default by Developer. Right to Cure. If the Developer commits an event of default upon its obligations as imposed by this Agreement, or pursuant to the Note and Mortgage executed by Developer, or as defined within the Development Agreement with City and does not cure the event of default within the time proscribed within the Development Agreement, the City may give the Developer notice of the City's intention to terminate the private installation of the Developer Improvements, and the City may proceed to let contracts to complete the Developer Improvements. The cost of said contracts, plus other obligations of the Developer under the Development Agreement, may be drawn from the remaining unadvanced amount of Lender under this Disbursement Agreement. In the alternative, upon default by the Developer of its obligations under the Development Agreement following the above-described notice, the City may request the Lender to advance the remaining unadvanced funds under this Disbursement Agreement directly to the City, which finds the City shall send in escrow for the exclusive purpose of completing the Developer Improvements and satisfying the other obligations of the Developer under the Development Agreement. Upon final completion of the Developer Improvements, the City shall pay any remaining funds to Lender to be applied as a payment on Developer's behalf. The notice of uncured default shall be signed by the Mayor or the Clerk of the City. Copies of the said notices shall also be served on the Lender. In the event the City does not recoup its coat in completing the Developer Improvements under the provisions of this paragraph, as an additional remedy, the City may, at its option, assess the benefited property in the manner provided by Minneso n ,Statute% Section 429.01 et seq. 9. This Agreement shall expire on December 15, 1997. This Agreement shall automatically be extended for successive six-month periods unless Lender gives written notice to the City 30 days prior to any expiration date. If the Loader chooses not to extend the Agreement and the City desires continued financial security for the Developer's obligations under the Development Agreement, the City may request the Lender disburse to the City the remaining unadvanced amount of this Disbursing viwslra.nsa: urW 66S PAP a i Agreement, which funds the City shall hold in escrow for the exclusive purpose of completing the Developer Improvements or other obligations of the Developer under the Development Agreement. Upon final completion of the Developer Improvements and satisfaction of the Developer's obligations under the Development Agreement, the City shall pay any remaining funds to Lender to be applied as a payment on Developer's behalf. 9. Any request by the City or the Lender which is authorized by paragraphs 7 and 8 shall be honored by the Lender within three (3) business days after demand is made by the City. 10. Any notice provided for in this Agreement may be delivered or mailed as follows: Lender: First National Bank PO Box 239 Monticello, MN 55362 Developer: Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc. 12420 Armitage Avenue NW Monticello, MN 55362 City: 250 East Broadway PO Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 Attn: Rick Wolfsteller Such notices shall be deemed to have been given when received by all parties. 11. 4over in ng aw. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the law of the State of Minnesota. 12. Ae81QIImPnL The rights of the City under this Agreement cannot be assigned. 13. B e inQ Rffec-L This Agreement shall inure to and bind the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 14. No Third Party Right. This Agreement is made for the solo benefit of the parties hereto. No other person shall have any rights or remedies under this Agreement. PWRIEMS 4=M7 5A -'T pop 4 L C IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have made and entered into this Agreement as of the first day and year above written. CITY OF MONTICELLO By: William Fair Its Mayor By: Rick Wolfsteller Its City Administrator CEDRUS CREEK CRAFTSMAN, INC. By: John Komarek Its FIRST NATIONAL BANK By: 5RU OID vy's, a"T A Council Agenda - 4/28/97 c' fesaidbility:, sewer- waterstorm With proposed i:. c,, v, Wright , Read 117 and Cediar :,.e • City Council is asked to authorize preparation of a feasibility study that would analyze design and cost estimates to construct a public street and associated utilities along the new Chelsea Road alignment between Cedar Street and County Road 117. This request is submitted by the owner of the property that is located south of the proposed roadway. There are no specific commercial development proposals submitted at this time for the property benefited by this improvement. The cost to complete the study is $3,500. Motion to authorize completion of the feasibility study subject to the applicant making a deposit of $3,500. 2. Motion to deny authorization of completion of a feasibility study. C. STAFF RF.COMMF.NDATION; The City Administrator recommends alternative 111. Area map. 41 .5( ® Improvements (Including I-94 and Che Aternative 4D Shown with Option 2 of Chelsea Road sgend 125 Improvement a mprovement p / Marvin Road Improvement t \) PETITIONER ROADWAY AND I a, I IIJ G I I L„j UTILITY PEASIBIL STUDY e �itv of Monticello, Minnesota Council Agenda - 4/28/97 5C. Co sideration ofealling for a special meeting with Monticello Township to discuRN urbanization plan modifications. (g,W.) At the previous meeting, the Council had discussed the Planning Commission's clarification of amendments to the urban service area that would have affected the Art Anderson and Orrin Thompson properties being considered by the Council for possible annexation. Although the Council voted to reconsider the denial for amendments to the urban service area, it was also agreed by the Council that reconsideration would be postponed until after a meeting had been held with the Monticello Township Board concerting a review of the entire orderly annexation area and urban service boundaries. The Council's request for setting up a meeting with the Township Board to include the Planning Commission and Council members was considered by the Township Board on Monday, April 21. In summary, the Township Supervisors indicated they would be willing to have a joint meeting between the City and Township under certain conditions, namely: The only individuals allowed to have discussion during this meeting would be the City Council and Township Supervisors. The meeting would be no longer than 2 hours at the Monticello Township Hall or at another neutral site. The meeting would be presided over by a neutral moderator, which the Supervisors felt should be conducted by Pat Sawatzke, Wright County Board member. While the Township is aware that this gathering would have to be a public meeting open to all participants for attendance, they would like to exclude the Monticello Planning Comnuasion from the discussion, along with City staff participation, although they recognize that all individuals aro allowed to attend the meeting. They do not want to have this as a public hearing and would not intend to allow public input from anyone. While there certainly may be merit in having the Planning Commission members be involved in discussion on modifications to the urban service area. I do understand that it is ultimately the City Council and Township Board's decision to make regarding any changes. While the idea of o moderator to preside over the meeting may be a good idea, I'm not so sure `� that the Council would agree that Pat Sawatzko is the best neutral choice for Council Agenda - 4/28/97 presiding over this meeting. In addition, it may be unfortunate if Planning Commission members or City staff are not allowed to provide historical information or engineering background regarding utilities and service capabilities within the orderly annexation area, as this information could be beneficial for both parties in their discussions of the boundaries to be considered. If the Council is comfortable with the meeting being set with the conditions outlined by the Township, your action would be to simply select a date and agree to a location and, if necessary, a moderator. B. ALTERNATNE ACTIONS: �f Council could agree to set May 20 at 7:30 p.m. as the date for a special meeting with Monticello Township to discuss the urbanization plan boundaries. � Under this alternative, the Council would agree to the conditions established by the Board of not allowing the meeting to be a public hearing and allowing discussion only from Township Supervisors and \, City Council members. In addition, the Council would be comfortable with Wright County Commissioner Pat Sawatzke being the neutral moderator presiding over the meeting. 2. Council could agree to the May 20 special meeting date and limiting the discussion to Council and Supervisors only but re N commend a different moderator to preside over the meeting. If the Council selects this option, you may want to be thinking of another individual that could be requested to be the moderator. Council could request that the Monticello Planning Commission and Township Planning Commission also be invited to participate in the discussion since both bodies will ultimately have to deal with land planning issues in the orderly annexation area. While I'm aware that the Council's original request for a special meeting was to include the Planning Commission members in the discussion of the urban service area, I assume the City Council would still be agreeable tq meeting with the Township without the Planning Commission being pari of the discussion. As far as limiting all outside discussion Brom non -Supervisors or Council members, this may become a problem if the staff or someone else has Council Agenda - 4/2"7 ` information that could be beneficial to the meeting but would not be allowed to speak. As far as a neutral moderator, this may not be a bad idea, but the Council has to decide whether you agree that Mr. Sawatzke would be considered neutral in this matter. I certainly would recommend that a meeting is necessary and be conducted as soon as practical and would, therefore, recommend meeting on May 20 if you're comfortable with the conditions they have requested. Copy of Township letter. f� R A Monticello Township County Road 117 Monticello, Minnesota 55362 April 22nd, 1997 To, Rick Wolfsteller, City of Montice dministrator. Froms Darlene Sawatzk�erNocello Township. Regardingo Request by City of Monticello for a joint meeting between the City and the Township in regard to reviewing the urbanization area as a whole. With conditions, the Board of Supervisors, have agreed to dlecuse the above matter with the City Council on Tuesday, May 20th at 730 p.m., at the Monticello Township Itall or at a neutral site. Alternative date could be on May 27th at the same time. One of the agreeing conditions are that the Mayor and the Monticello City Council Members, and the Monticello Township Board of Supervisors, be the only participants in the diecuseion. The other condition to that a neutral moderator preside over the meeting. The board felt that Wright County Commissioner Pat Sawatzko would be a good choice for that position, and he has agreed to serve in that capacity. If the above is agreeable to the Mayor and City Council, please inform me so that I have ample time to comply with state statutes that pertain to the open meeting laws. Thank you. 6100014 Council Agenda - 4/28197 BD. Consideration of agWrovingr Monticello Knights of Columbus A88 .rt sapplieation to nVerate n gambling l_icen_se at Comfort Inn (R.W.) A REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Monticello Knights of Columbus organization would like to apply to the State Gambling Control Board for a license to conduct a pulltab operation at the Comfort Inn Treehouse Lounge. Although the license is issued by the State Gambling Control Board, each local jurisdiction must pass a resolution either approving or denying the organizations request. As an added note, typically when gambling licenses are renewed, the City Council has requested that the organization provide a list of revenues and expenditures over the past few years, including a list of all donations made from the gambling proceeds. Since this organization will be new to the pulltab operation in Monticello, there is no history to review in regard to their past practices, and the Council would have to wait until a renewal came up before getting this information. B. LT . NATIV . ACTION : It 1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the State Gambling Control Board to issue a pulitab license to the Monticello Knights of Columbus for the Comfort Inn Motel. 2. Do not adopt a resolution approving the license request. It has been the Council's past policy not to oppose any gambling license application request as long as the organization was deemed to be a local organization conducting the gambling. City staff does not have any reason to recommend denial of this application request. Copy of resolution. 11 3 RESOLUTION 97 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A GAMBLING LICENSE WHEREAS, the Monticello Knights of Columbus #6825 has submitted an application to the City Council of Monticello for the issuance of a charitable gambling license to conduct gambling at the Comfort Inn Motel located in Monticello, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, upon review of the organization's activities, the Council is not opposed to the gambling license being issued by the State Gambling Control Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that the Monticello Knights of Columbus #6825 application for license issuance listed above is hereby approved, and the State Gambling Control Board is authorized to process the application. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of April, 1997. City Administrator Mayor SO# Council Agenda - 4/28/97 Consideration \ Axtengion to earnivaj A RF.FF.RRNCE AND BACKGROUND: In October of 1996, the Monticello Mall Merchants Association applied for their annual license to have Chuck's Amusements operate a carnival at the mall this spring. The Council had approved the request for the carnival license that was to run from May 28 through June 1, Wednesday through Sunday. Marilyn Gartner of the Monticello Mall Association recently requested Council consideration of allowing the mall to extend the carnival's stay for an additional week through Sunday, June 8, for a total of approximately 12 days instead of 6. The reason for the request came from Chuck's Amusement, the carnival operator, who indicated they will be moving their operation from the mall to Big Lake on the weekend of June 8 and would like to be allowed to leave their carnival set up at the mall rather than dismantling it for less than a week. From the Mall Merchants Association's standpoint, they did not have a problem with it remaining the additional days but realized it's a decision of the Council. As an added note, the carnival does provide a certificate of insurance for liability coverage during their operation. B. ALTFRNATIVE ACTIONS: Approve the extension of the previously -granted 6 -day carnival license to a maximum of 12 days from May 28 through June 8. 2. Do not approve the license extension. 5 C. STAFFRF.COMMFNDATION: The staff is not aware of this carnival operation causing any problems as far as City regulations are concerned over the past three years. Since the Council has determined in the past that the Mall Association was a nonprofit group, it is assumed wo would continue to waive the daily licenso fees but still require the operator to show proof of liability coverage. In regard to the extension request, the staff is not aware of any reason for the Council to deny the request at this time. n SUPPORTINt DATA: None. Council Agenda - 4/28/97 A RFFRRPNCF AND BA .K .ROUND: For several years now, the City of Monticello has supported the Tree City U.S.A. Program by proclaiming the observance of the last Friday in April as Arbor Day and the entire month of May as Arbor Month. We usually hold a small celebration on Arbor Day in Ellison Park and notify the local paper. The small celebration in the past has been really a tree planing ceremony. This year we are a little late in getting this subject before the City Council; consequently, the staff' has taken the liberty to notify the paper of our tree planting ceremony to be held Friday, April 25, 1997, at 2 p.m. in Ellison Park. The observance of Arbor Day and Arbor Month is a small part of meeting the Tree City U.S.A. requirements. The City also must have a tree board or separate department, a community ordinance, and a tree forestry program, which is supported by at least $2 per capita. Through our support of these programa, we also become eligible for some of the matching grants through the state of Minnesota. We all know the benefits of planting trees for shade and beauty for our community for the next generation. I would like the City again to proclaim April 25, 1997, as Arbor Day and the month of May as Arbor Month, much as Governor Carlson has done in the enclosed Proclamation. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTION : The first alternative is to support the staff's Arbor Day celebration held on April 25, and declare April 25, 1997, as Arbor Day and the month of May as Arbor Month. The second alternative is not to support the Arbor Day and Arbor Month proclamation for 1997. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council proclaim Arbor Day and Arbor Month as outlined in alternative N1. D. RUPPORTING DATA: CCopy of the Proclamation from State of Minnesota signed by the Governor; copy of Proclamation for the City of Monticello. -d �.. ....... ; 4 proclamation WliERFAS: Lhcb bcs:oy; and WILLREAS: Tnms — so b.—*,gty vital resomee I. Mio—as tafty. --k" oav� Uta by purify� da — —o—iq " - wzw and .V: .41% Jobs d..4h . WW fiord pod. idt y,, —inn a m—tional tum-: pmvidiq Ww fm wildlife ofd kinds: wW avaing bamaul IuWwnes w tusks — caom..Wes — fiv.Mc: sod WHEREAS: Ilu=u wurnm mb a owunuction d-qA poWkm and WgIecL as well ffldirnwk exatater, di�ase sal hams 1Nedo wo loco, erotirtt qte � fm aneeald [tion m crave the fut— ty and nffW kwcgtl in = %:Ate. country wA w W; mW WHERPAS: Indhidttats m am locally In itupow the cuvnuornm by ptanfing um wW em utV Lbx th- bus — proaetd ad rvdva pp. msmteruce to the y— shod. and WIIERUS: F -h y— . dw to Fddy I. April sad dao Shoto the rrenth of M.Y. MWw— and &d. 0-1— sothe cmd=.d h.ILh of ow ma's cont..q sod nwd r .. 2b; NOW, 71 IERJ TORE 1, ARKE 11. CARLSON. Uov.rtm of ft SL= of Minnesom do hcrcby pa taim Apd2S, 1997tob. ARBOR DAY sod U. Month of May w b. ARBOR MONTH In Mn.KKL IN YMNISS 1"IMEOF. 1 hew heteuao to my had ad an dw Grcw Sc2l of 00 Stw of M fmrama to be aMd a It. Star CapW 0rb .My4ft day of A;,u I. ur y" of ass L—d trm titammd aio htm I sewwMewmendeldve Sum ft — hlmLcd thutyWA 0 0 v It 0 N 0 a ArrA %fr-rr 4 0- NtONTICELLO CITY OF MONTICELLO PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Minnesota's forest treasures were a significant attraction to early settlers because of their usefulness and the beautiful environment they provided; and WHEREAS, trees are an increasingly vital resource in Minnesota today,, enriching our lives by purifying air and water, helping conserve soil and energy, creating jobs through a large forest products industry, serving as recreational settings, providing habitat for wildlife of all kinds, and making our cities more liveable, and WHEREAS, human activities such as construction damage and pollution, as well as disease and insects, threaten our trees, creating the need for concerted action to ensure the future of urban and rural forests in our state, country, and world; and WHEREAS, each year on the last Friday in April and throughout the month of May, Minnesotans pay special tribute to the vital natural resource that our trees represent and dedicate themselves to the continued health of our state's community and rural forests; NOW. THEREFORE, 1, WILLIAM A. FAIR, Mayor of the City of Monticello, do hereby proclaim April 25, 1997, to be ARBOR DAY and the month of May, 1997 to be ARBOR MONTH in Monticello, Minnesota. Further, 1 urge all citizens to become more aware of the importance of trees to their well being, to participate in tree planting programs that will ensure a green Minnesota in decades to come, and to plant, nurture, protect, and wisely use Minnesota's great treasure of trees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Monticello to be affixed this twenty-eighth day of April in the year of our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety -Seven. --�� MAYOR ��� Council Agenda - 4/28/97 7. Publie. bearing on ado ion of Roused assessment roll for dplipquent utility b lla and certification of ansesampnit roll to County Auditor. (R.W., C.S.) A_ F.F .RF.N F AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is again asked to adopt an assessment roll for utility billing accounts which are delinquent more than 60 days and to certify the assessment roll to the County Auditor for collection on next year's real estate taxes if not paid by November 30, 1997. The delinquent utility accounts that are included with the agenda are accounts that are at least 60 days past due and include all new delinquents from the last time we certified them. In addition to the delinquent amount, the Council also previously approved the establishment of an administrative fee of $25 per account that is added to each delinquent assessment. The amounts shown on the enclosed delinquent utilities list include the additional $25 administration fee for the preparation of the assessment roll. It is recommended that the delinquent accounts be put on an assessment roll for certification in 1998 at an interest rate of 8% as allowed by state statute. As in the past, if any accounts are paid within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll, they can be paid without the additional interest. After 30 days, payments will be charged interest and can be accepted up to November 30, 1997. 11 kITFRNATFVR ACTION Adopt the assessment roll for the delinquent charges as presented. Based on public hearing input, adjust the assessment roll as required. It is staff recommendation that the Council adopt the assessment roll as presented. All of the accounts are at least 60 days past duo and have been given proper notice of this assessment hearing and ample opportunity to pay the accounts in Bill. All utility accounts were notified that there would be an additional $26 administrative fee attached to each outstanding balance if the account was not paid by 4:30 p.m. on April 21, 1997. Copy of resolution adopting assessment roll; Complete listing of delinquent accounts to be certified. RESOLUTION 97 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND UTII.ITY BIIJ WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for delinquent accounts receivable charges. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the parcels named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in one (1) annual installment payable on or before the first Monday in January 1999 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1998. 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution. 4. The City Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to the county auditor to be extended on the proper tax list of the county, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of April, 1997. Mayor C City Administrator 7A- .1 17.06.54 7U 1. 1936 filo 171107 IWti WTI1]u3]OIS VITM TO( 0MG! I ACPPVnt 1 RIO 1 Ptmerts ADO'e1s Of Cwta.r Nl Cust Nb 7 MIO Dal C.r6o W. OW90 Das O•r 170 Dar Ute total 1 Past Due fast M Past DIM Past Ow Q0 ge .EUte 0" 100750000 15s01000 Wo In RIVE/ Sr E MICM4EL PELARSOI 51)1 'CEDAR TAKE RD 51.11 .00 .00 .00 15.00 11.41 100370000 45010055040 101 A1VEC $1 Y PAT 1V PORRS )01 CMR $r V 170.14 ,00 ,Do ,00 75.00 145.14 100190000 45010055Cf1 1 MIT ST Tm NMGER I LCCOST SCE 19.25 .00 .00 .00 75.00 64.71 100010000 ISSOIOD51010 711 ILUNT n MICWL O'COICA" PO COS 111 75,11 .00 .00 .00 75.00 100.71 100/50000 1550IC561W0 301 PROs $i OtU 110E 101 PSCMt 51 V 111.14 .00 ,00 ,00 tS.p Ii1.11 1006100100 6501MC011 611 AIgC 57 V S7i L1A 5f1NEIDEI 619 CMI 51 V 11.71 .00 .CO .00 8.00 SL1 101)0000 ISWIDOutp 01 It VI 51 V R"EL $,4tM 975 /MR St Y $1.71 .00 .00 ,00 25.00 11.11 101150001 ISSOTOM $2 103 00AP $7 VCI(M Val DOPIP CID Opt 75 71.11 ,00 .00 .00 MGO 57.11 101)60000 IS504GDSIM 11 f3VEa $I E t(N-LO 6EGIN11 liVEi IT l 110.71 ,00 ,00 .00 15.00 115.11 )001/0600 t5SO11016010 110 tn9111e7r01 ST LiA "IIS VECPt, 110 "Aw'TCTN n 15.71 ,00 ,00 .00 75.00 110.71 105110000 15MIO0100p 111 tP IMI Y JEII711/REBECCA MN CED PO COI 1611 10.17 .00 .00 .00 15.00 105.17 700110000 MOTO 110 T6 607 MAIM WAY "IMS PO BCI 311 67.51 .00 .00 .00 25.00 11.51 )00t000p Isso IM nID 110 VIIQ $I Alto OR 0101 DEMU15 IO coy al 91.11 ,DO ,00 ,00 MITI 11.11 700150000 ISMIM50J0 -01600000{--NMMIiN.= 11) MADMAT V - WWI) BEMMI 113 9t010*I V C- __.. 111.11 .00 .00 .00 MDo 1MITI 7111100M 45010011011 owdMR _ 709 VaWJT Si J10/ *11111 PO MI 4W fri.ro 501, SI 701170000 ISsot001S1SO ISI 9RNOn7 V G., 0(l[ 00 ED, 101 10.1, .00 .00 .00 25.00 15.11 )011/0000 ISMIDMI)1 lu UCAMAT Y $ills A'S GSI 611 CMI $1 Y 10.15 44,11 '.1.K 25,00 11.45 701475001 15501435010 1p """1 Y GALE COLE IW(M (Io111AILE) 70.11 .00 .00 .00 75.00 51.95 1001{01901' 4 500 0 0010 10 }Il MV $1 TIM Blinl PU ECC }17 15.51 .00 .00 .00 MOO 170.61 IMM 45010036050 711 LIMN $i DAVID 1 DEBRA MEVISUN 111 LDM 11 51.11 .00 .00 ,00 8.00 11.11 ,III 3CC57CJ05 ❑'5100010 t0 IIGPOMN-NMM+w 111 110 $1 Y MAT CANTIQL 'Na IWIY iOPGii 125 ICED st V 61.71 .C5 .00 - .00 25.00 07.11 30093CDp MCI" ;0100 101 111) 51 l GIIMD E.N311ET R0 COX ion 17.11 .00 .00 - .00 75.01 ILII 101030001 ISMIC�1p0 111 rM 61 E IMM PIt" 116 IID IT E M. If .00 .00 .00 25.01 I11. 11 )01170M ISMISO)K61 105 VAM1117011 51 111 EIEII II !q MIMINiIT" $1 63.11 .00 .00 ,010 11.00 11.11 60111000001 ISSOI100p71 106 AIM IT I Vsn4 CW 105 AM 111 11.11 ,00 .00 ,00 7S.p 171.11 4p97CM 15$040101)0 111 UJ611 Er AT AN 9 JI AN DU IN 151Y_A IUII Aq w AO.AI .CO .00 .00 75.05 l.0 SMI1d"...7' )$tot= 001 I I! AIM SCE Y JOd COMIC)/ 1170 441ITA61 aI IY 11.11 .00 .00 .00 25.M 4).69 50700CDp IM1000`Ap 101 {iX $1 Y DAIPT MEN III? I G4�0 PLACE 11.11 .00 ,00 .00 75,00 11.51 IO041= 16r-911011010 1365 fiGW/t Y GEI 1A OYM RAT IE1 1155 UOKY1T V 07.07 .07 .00 .DO 25.00 IOI,OD ICU= ISM 170}010 1771 • 1 lA flt qMl P[lm011 1171 SM111 U 76.11 .00 ,00 ,00 8.00 Io I, II 601770001 1555010)1701 1171 RIVET 91 Y 1 f OOKVILLE I)}I Ilgl IT 11 10.11 .0 .00 .00 25.00 05.91 /01750501 I555000117C7 1)71 /lql 0 Y 10 MITCV Ill Ng01lM I)n AIM 11 Y Ito 043 ,al .h .00 75.01 M. 9011c= 1555,111:3 1 AMA IE CR►I PACO JM113 GNTG PO CCI IIP 70.10 .00 ,00 ,09 71.00 15,90 601//0000 15`a'000111p I{ /lql TttPCI P40 JANII M0GLL011 11 AMA TIRtXI PMX 70.07 .Do .Do .00 IS.p 15.01 1/1100007 /550101/01 11 11 1 rt6A:[ OAU lwM TAYICIVS II IMI 1157IC1 4" 40,4 ,C9 .M ,00 M.01 65.G toII&= y55C:'J 1101 11 llgl RRRCI PALO Le (ArAIS 11 tlgl gC1C1 )ACX 70,60 ,00 .00 ,Do 25.00 As. to 60110077 ISSC0l11C3 II Ilgl 710701 PAR, J.AK3 KAIE1 11 tlVll ttchct 0AL11 10,11 .00 .00 .00 25.01 15.10 60110= 1565=1 tlp 45 AMA It IOC) Pus CKICTIQ 11P1011M 45 Clal RnCJ PACX 11,77 .C7 .00 .00 25.00 31.70 0Dtol= M!=)IM " Ila1 IInCt PAD C.� 61�P SI AMI RCPACl CALK 10.11 .0 .t7 ,00 8.00 15. AO BOIIIpt1 15 Y.C"__111M 61 Rlal It DCI PAD 1Jp U/ IO4VIL26N AI AMA Ruict PA IA 70.11 ,00 ,00 .00 25.00 ISM CD105p01 1SS5G::lllp 17 0189 TERCE PAD CE.:FII IIq IF a] ilal RtlL'1 CRL7 11.10 .00 ,p .CO 71.00 M. 807010101 15MI1 C37iM CM07CM 15'-5=110 LG) p111MV ClA ISIS Mlle W 07 UIAID PIAI7 MIX[ J01I'.3 PO CI 71 1$75 Nul," GO 11.01 07.11 .C3 .00 Xo .00 .00 .0a n.p 25.00 91.01 117.91 CUa70l's 1455[0011105 1005 AMA El V Llr1 MILM IMS 11,70 51 Y 11,61 Do .CO .Do n. CO t1.63 19111001 IS010: 1010 1105 CLLl7N AVI Al ![ 4.70 TOIrSVi1 N: PO Cil C31 TIM ,C3 ,p .00 Moo 101.49 CITY O rNTIZIUO Y 27/01 11.a.5a GIR 6, 1996 DELP YTEI, -11106 CIR71FICATIONS NTN LATE CKAM `..1 7 Ammm 1 PIC 1 Drooerte Awelf API Cust NA® Clot NZ 2 0,210 ar Oer60 ar Oer" al 015110 017 Late Iota 1 Past Dime Past Du Past Due Past Due Charge ./Late Ch" /00210000 iSWASD0110 117 IEOIe LIEIEPT 01 1100" l IWI III III" U11191 0P 90.1{ .00 .00 .00 25.00 115.66 1co am nW 41"2010 117 LINM LCW6lte DR MICMAEJ tEN57MM 117 P[vIN ION;IET DP 67.13 .00 ." .00 75.00 11.15 1(015000 IS5076"2010 100 MOEN ELYMO t0 IVAN NAI IEP PO ECL 117 52.17 .00 .00 .00 25.00 11.17 1010)00" 15507600)020 171 vAWIM LWOD RD JAME5 JCI" 171 NFVIM ILNO" RD 1112.91 .DO .00 .00 25.00 171.06 IOIa1a0" 155011")060 100 KbuN ll JAAfs IRE00 1W NECMwI U 61.11 .0 ." .0 75." Ie. f9 to110000 153071")050 112 4tARM La LAW MtUIF 112 MEDM W LA 103.11 ." ." .00 75.00 II0.)) to 1160000 ISS WOO IU MEENAM l6 LAW JDM%w 1u NEDIMM u 51.11 ." .00 .00 21.00 17.{1 1017100" 15W)IOD OW 117 64lW CEP LINA LO11JC1 W 601 15{ 19.11 .0 .0 .0 75.170 I".11 10)110000 ISSO1SOa170 725 TWIN FLNODD 1[11 "' 1 725 NMN ELWCO RD 10.16 .00 .00 .0 25.00 105.56 10761"0 1650150060 107 CPQOS CIA 11X1 MCelp 107 Ctt{VS Lae 61.01 ." ._ .0 25.0 11.01 607510000 1550n006o50 109 CROCUS CII I. CO[a)0A i C. MANSON 101 CWM CEO 66.11 .00 .00 .0 25.0 111.17 w)t"M n5ols"R60 116 Cla lA 61F0A ULeM 116 CI`= La 11.11 .00 .0 .Do 73." 101.17 Ia0500o0 15501500110 710 MWi Ul ELNOW 10 omo Mom 210 NMM ELMOm RD 66.11 .00 .00 .0 75.00 11.P1 101010000 155015x1110 In "110 (tWMD ID Klll[ LNMWI 176 N➢NM [IYDm RD p.{I .0 .00 .0 TS." 11,61 lam= 155015071171 127 wEVEN CLN070 ID 5(071 1 OEAWE ROCRG 727 MIPVIM nN000 RD 2% .0 .x ." 75.00 11.56 10177"00 155011011010 ISI "Ll"" LI STEN 1 PEW 11015[N ISI N(DNw 11 17.11 .0 .OR, .00 75.00 101,71 10171"0 15s011a1o70 161 1l["AR II JwS C(LLETII IU MEDMLN U 121.00 .00 .0 .00 25.00 n7.x IEt7/0D00 1130)1001010 17S KOMIM LA A[MTN LOSMICG I]! MIrdM11 U 15.15 .00 .0 .00 15.00 110.15 101(10= 155021[71050 102 WVDA ILW= ID NIKE 1 Mus WIT[ 107 MUM nW3E, 90 L1.1! .00 .00 .w 25.03 to. Is 00111000 nM9)1"1110 0 SNOTRAP CIP slit 1 nN GRIG2 1 !d07W UP 11.00 .0 .00 .00 75.0 96.= SOlGACPOO 155071=1010 5 SNORAP CIP LEI CCOTI S SAMORU CIP 11.11 .0 ," .0 75.0 102.97 C0197gDo 1530)100)010 11 [Ct[ CII JACK WET1 11 [a$t CIR 61.70 .0 .0 .0 n.= OD. to /99%(00 ISM911C110" 11 ME CIO IED OIMIFLS 16 FIJ( CIP d.11 .0 .0 .0 25.= Wil.H 10965(00 nM9ll"R70 601 11N WIEN DR Lit 1 TOM CN for Aa UVIMEN CI u,ll .0 .0 .0 IS. Do 10.11 IM222= IS=33I I to 661] ICER POLL 01 IAXL [(13 6"1 "ENR K! L OR 57.51 .0 .0 .CD 7S.x 07.51 1C07m= 1$`91101"0 6R IN WIN Da 1)01 1 LOP] PAOE111 970 PMM fN 01 66.71 .0 .05 .0 7$.00 09.78 ' IC"IICDO I!S"1(71120 9511 GIILIM W1 14 it[ PFTEPm, 6511 GILLAM NN M[ 57.11 .0 .0 .0 25.0 11.0) 1()1100 1550.1' 27170 1166 Mill PIM t0 1L01D KEENI 61" MOLL 1111 t0 IC3.17 .0 .0 .0 IS Do 0).17 111131C0o IS`9150o0 TDO( OWIEN LA JC1 I KARa KUZN 701 CIINIEN U R.tO .0 .0 .0 215.0 64,00 Mato= 1S5s50=R90 7111 4"" PIT" IIQOIWS 1111 MIAM LA 11.10 .0 .x .0 75,0 11.10 I1a1100 1550150]"0 925 NO'" Op OR JI6.If MUWICNS 915 WADaN aha a 0.10 .0 .0 .0 75.0 IS.C3 110107=0 ISM910"1100 IS" CIIM 0045 CLW DAVID 1 JOKE LD1wa617 1611 DIU Ou1S ULO 11.{6 .0 ." .0 25.0 06.6] 11"11=0 IWO= 1660 011 aIOGF OR ITVA KRU Tao OI1 IIDGI OR 61.10 .0 ." .00 76.0 02.3 I1x1000 1!!010"610 MW GLAVItN Ct OUn IONAFm EL60 OIIYIIN C1 11.11 .90 .00 .00 15.0 11.11 INWHOOO 1555011a103 201 1JELLDEw'I PARK MME, WITH 707 IJILLCIE '1 PAR" TD.O .0 .00 .00 25." 15.0 17== 1515016610 R7 KJ1l LCEw'6 PAN ONu OI wav 201 KAIICF w'{ Pan 11,10 .0 .a .0 n." $6.20 IMDD JJ 1556"1500 r= LAWIENG'6 PAPP WILIME LEGEI r" NALLCERG PARI U.x0 .00 ." ." 25.00 Se.70 173m= tSl50nu3 711 Wliketw16 Put PAIN DAIILLIP7 211 NALLCIa'S PKI 11.20 .0 ." ." n." 11.70 12=11=0 1515=1suo) 20 1JELLEEWS Pap IUOe LN&61 102 tl[ll0ER6'f DARK 10.67 .40 .0 .w 2s," 15.07 1X914010 N!5"151107 Tu UII LDt w's PNp a1T" DOW 211 PALLCIty's DNs1 10.10 .DO ." IS." 95.0 ,=It .0' ISSSC71Su0 217 LmLum:t rum LL`i CM= rll NALLCEa'1 Pap TI.R .0 ._ :CO. 21.0 G.7D 110}1000 ILS almAG) 211 LJ L11:111616 Dat1 IOL AIluo 771 eA ILCI CS PARK 11." .00 .0 .= 25.00 Ss.70 17077207 ll,=P.11ol tt7 LJELLCM'O PALM JAMES /MIFF 1 JOOCF A61U5 10.40 .0 .0 .= 15.07 15.10 170110001 11, SM lWC3 215 UII LUtG'S rap KALICIC'S PUB DN: (CIG HECKMAN) 10.4 .q .0 .= n." 15.0 12G15= IWO 14603 ICS LJtILCEG'1 Pap CATM 11RD10TI 105 SALL CG' 1 DAR1 11.20 ,0 .C3 ,= n.0 to. 70 17[25100 NSmm"03 10 WEILClt7'6 Fan Ilan PIGLON PO CCI IT11 11." ,0 ._ .= n,= to, 7o 11(x0 3"CO AG) 1 9111(("'6 Dan L'61 CELLKA I IIIILCEC7'1 FARC 1133 .0 ,_ As 7b. CD 6533 (111 O el71TICE1,10 A A M END O r 1 I R 0 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 Cllf 0 06-OTICILLO 04/22//7 17.06.51 070 4, l"I OSLO U11u11 SILL M; CIETIFICA71015 nM LATE 004046E PAU 7 aaMt t PID 1 Prwertf Address ART Costar NAPA Gat N_ 7 0170 ON, 0x10 DIY 0,110 Of+ 01170 Dry Ute Total 1 Pan pe Past 0. Part Doe Past DYe a" •/Late awge Itmucm 15550015"01 5 KJElLBM'S PARK ROMAINETTE RID AlaSa 5 rJELL1E66'S /ARK 10.40 .00 .00 .00 75.00 1S." 1700670000 15150015"01 { KJRLUM's PARK YICII m 6 KJELLNWS /IRI( 11.70 .00 .00 .00 75.00 $6.70 1700100600 11550015"a 1 41 MM'S PARK MIT VI00 S IJELLUM'S /IRI 10.40 .00 .00 .00 75.00 15.00 17001/9000 1115/015"03 16 UILLUM'S PARK LSIE 7=/,(N("E 00MM 16 KILLUER4'S flit( 10.10 .00 .00 .00 75. 00 15.10 1NM= x550015"0) II KJ11MRG'S PARK TODD 7EGl0Y 71 KJELLDIR6'S PION 70.10 .00 .00 .00 MOD 45.90 INDIA= 1s5500151Aa 101 YJTIM G'S PARK J" KWO 70) unL6EM's PARK 10.40 .00 .00 .00 75.00 )$.AD 1700110000 115500 x"Ol 106 KJnLUR6'3 PARK la f6'CIER 101 KJELMERG's PARK 70.10 .00 .00 .a 75.00 15.10 1707100000 15550015"01 101 KJll UK'S PAR% Tc. IID 1141 FI,LVA 707 1.(11416'! PARI 10.10 .00 .00 .CO 75.00 15.10 170091= ISSSCIIS"G) 110 fJELLDERO'S PAO1 LORI FALWI 1 f175S UI 110 +ALUM'S /ARK 10.10 .00 .00 .00 75.00 ]5.40 1700150000 15510015"0) 111 UttLREG's PAR% ALAN 111PANIE1 116 KAIMRS'S /ARK 70.10 .00 .00 .00 75.00 15.{9 1201120906 1sssm x"04 106 unLUK's PARK 0405E I(fEf 106 CJILl4RG'S PARK 11." .00 .00 .00 n. cc 55.70 1701"COOD 15550 ISMO) 104 KJI1LISEWS PARR LJILLCIM'S IK (DIVA MOM 20.00 .00 .00 .00 75.00 1s.00 1201700000 15550015"0) Sp IJEILOE9G'S PARK BEI" JACrM61 $06 UELl4tfi'3 /AQI 11.70 .00 .00 .00 25.00 $6.70 11000600/0 ISSO6i0010SO Sao SiKlIK6 01 DEMIS 1 SAG JIM TI 5090 SIAMIG 01 04.11 .DO .Do .00 25.00 11,11 1106115006 ISS01700m10 Ilm ralARO u ROGII I OnAIMA NIMPIC SteO YAlIKO U 04.11 .00 .00 .049 Is to1. it 1310150600 15507)001010 5750 IMLLAM U ISLA01l EK"60LI? SM MULIRO LA 6.04 .00 .00 .00 75.06 IO.a 11CaIG7.^9 x5007097310 565 MALLARD LA JEFF Lao 5"O WIASD u 11.01 .DO .00 .00 7,.00 11104 q"I$= sbolIMW20 SAO 51Ag116 01 JMCS LIS 1740 57 An 116 a ",14 .Do .00 .Do 7b. CID 61." 1107750600 1550I0C9" HAD SIAEIING DR NARN7 LIND" 5"0 SIULT" a 11.51 .00 .00 .00 22.00 107.51 ua610Dp Is50"=010 1111 SlUk IMG ON DINNIS ROMMG 5511 11MILM DI ",51 .00 ,00 .oD n.DO 61.04 1107040000 Is50r0001100 ala FAL[a AYE Jlll NAr 0,S 5710 fAL[a AK IN.}7 ,00 .00 .00 22.00 151,22 1707C7D000 15507om to SAID fu Ca All IIC1WDft1E70A Ii0[M.0 5A IALta A1( so 0) 1." .00 .00 25, OD 16. 41 LIMA= ISM/01111 1171 Fuca AVE PARI AM 5571 FALCOI AW a.00 .00 .00 .0,e ».040 109.0 7aamp x 970077110 LSI FALCON As( JACQUIKI LAYALIE x51 1LICOO "1 1115 00 00 to n.Do 1!04613 155006092050 5171 SIGUNG OR L, a Y. BONNIE, $171 UARL06 a W. so .00 .00 .00 n. OC 81.10 130, Is= 15!740032010 5060 PAR! 91 of Pp COOKIE Spa Kul IN DR 11.57 .cc .00 .00 n.00 f7. Sl lie, loom IS50000"20 SOLO WIN Of LAWTH KOEP PO t07 071 51.71 .00 .CO .00 22.00 10.71 1/01060/00 1550W00Y,I5o 604] CIOUImQ OR It1f 1 0IM3 M1altIG 1061 i101EtID4 Of {1. if .00 .00 .00 75.11 16.11 awls= IS2063II cc IIn CED ROCI LA MRf11 I110tLLE 0"11 1777 fSD LOa U 11.51 .00 .00 .a 11.00 50.51 1/01120060 15s90DC010t0 1111 CID 4104 LA OAYID G"a 1710 IID Ma a ".a .00 .00 .00 75.00 11.15 W--*WLK/-+6"4"Aup---- •"• •'gym - - Q= Amax_ __/O7NW(OGTA N- --17."-E6A1- --16.16--.00 ISA In 905016a00 x".J610710M 207 RN(Il Sl PAUL 1061" 501 txCl7 91 11,70 .00 .00 .00 ».00 $6.N fO501ppp 22501100 1050 501 IxEf1 91 IIQAID D1UR:Dii s01 9ae31 a 10.10 .Do .00 .a 7,.m i!." 961 IMOD M104 OO IOEO Sit tAK11 Ir IIUI, MILINGa 1x tout ST 11.70 .00 .00 .p MOD 56.20 0^,,,,0111010 IWA Icmm 611 up -El SI PALL DAVIS PO CCs 5% n.00 .00 .00 As 7510 65.06 I MAL 10ALS ITT ft wq. 111... cam 171 A A M END O r 1 I R 0 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 Cllf 0 06-OTICILLO Council Agenda - 4/28/97 S 8. SonRideration of a request for a reduction .n b it imp permit fees previouslyy paid --Glen Posusta. (F.P. ) A RFIFFRENCE AND BACKGROUND: The complainant is concerned with the dollar amount paid for a building permit and the methods by which the building permit fee was determined. The complainant has appealed the building permit fee to the Chief Building Official, the Assistant City Administrator, and the City Administrator. Though the complainant has stated otherwise, the Building Official and City Administrator both listened to the complainant and then provided a careful and thorough explanation as to the basis of the permit fee paid. Each staff member involved has determined that the permit fee paid by the complainant was fair and determined correctly. The complainant was not satisfied with the responses provided by staff and is now seeking to have the City Council direct staff to satisfy his appeal of the building permit fee. Building permit fees are based on the valuation of building construction as calculated by the Building Official. That valuation is to be used Ualy for the purpose of determining the building permit fee amount. The building valuation is determined by multiplying the square footage of the building by a cost per square foot factor that has been provided to Minnesota cities by both the State Building Codes and Standards Division, and the International Conference of Building Officials (I.C.B.O.) (see attached table). By using the standardized building valuation table, the City is consistent and impartial in determining the valuation of building construction and fees for building permits. Building construction valuation as determined by a permit applicant is generally not consistent or impartial. Approximately 10 years ago, litigation between the City of Bloomington and a major developer provided direction to building officials throughout the State. In determining the building construction valuation on which to base the building permit fees, the City of Bloomington was apparently choosing to use either the valuntion as represented by the developer or the valuation as represented by the tables, whichever was highest. The Court found that the City of Bloomington was arbitrary in determining fees, to the benefit of the City, and found in favor of the developer. Many Minnesota cities have since adopted the Stato or I.C.B.O. building valuation table by city ordinance. 0 A Council Agenda - 4/28/97 The difference between the last building permit fees paid and those for the previous buildings of the complainant are without explanation. Staff feels that further review would be unfair to the complainant. B_ ALTERNAT No action required No action required. If the complainant feels that the County Assessor has unfairly or incorrectly determined the taxable market value of his property, then his concerns should be directed to the Annual Board of Review held in the City Council Chambers on May 7, 1997, at 7 p.m. 11 SUPPORTING DATA R ,il ingya►Ltion Data table in effect from April 1998 through April 1997. 12 STATE. OF MINNESOTA Department of Administration May 1996 1� BUILDINC VALUATION DATA y (Replaces Building Valuation Data - May 1995) t;igy :' The following building valuation data is provided for use in computing the building permit surcharges for remittances to the State or for comparison with valuations submitted by the applicant for permits. Adjustments should be made for special architectural or structural features Th °1O —i.. and location of the project; often higher or lower unit costs may result. The unit costs are �fa�srr intended to include architectural, structural, electrical, plumbing and mechanical work, except as d Mretm �. specifically listed below. The unit costs also include the contractor's profit, which should not be omitted. UBC DESIGNATION OCCUPANCY AND TYPE. COST PER SOUA_RF FOOT 1. APARTMENT HOUSES: 'Type 1 or 11 F.R. $ 73.96 Type V - Masonry 60.42 (or Type 111) Type V - Wood Frame 54.52 Type I - Basement Garage 27.95 2. AUDITORIUMS: Type I or 11 F.R. 78.60 Type Il - 1 Hour 56.76 Type 11 - N 53.84 Type 111- 1 (lour 59.86 Type HI - N 56.76 Type V - 1 Hour 57.19 Type V - N 53.32 3. BANKS: *Type 1 or 11 F.R. 110.94 Type 11 - 1 (lour 81.70 Type H - N 79.12 Type III - 1 Hour 90.13 Type HI - N 87.03 Type V - 1 Hour 81.70 Type V - N 78.26 l Bua&S Coln ad Stadardt Dlrlsion, Fe U do Maaava ens Bureau, 408 Metro Square Bailding, Seventh and Robert Strrel% St. Raab MN 15101; IW#: 612 296.46J9; Fax: 612 297.197) 77'17700: rwin Cider 612 297.1113 or Greater Minnesota 800 627-JS29 and ark for uuite number 22. SERVICE STATIONS: Type II - N 50.40 Type III - 1 Hour 52.46 Type V - l Hour 44.72 Canopies 20.98 23. STORES: *Type I or If F.R. 61.75 Type H - 1 Hour 37.84 Type H - N 36.81 Type HI -1 Hour 45.92 Type III - N 43.17 Type V - 1 Hour 38.70 Type V - N 35.69 24. THEATERS: Type I or 11 F.R. 82.30 Type Hl - 1 Hour 59.94 Type III - N 57.02 Type V - l Hour 56.42 Type V - N 53.32 25. WAREHOUSES: •• Type 1 or 11 F.R. 36.98 TypeII or V - 1 Hour 21.93 v� Type 11 or V - N 20.64 .T -r Type III - 1 Hour 24.94 Type III - N 23.82 EQUIPMENT: AIR CONDITIONING: Commercial 3.10 Residential 2.58 Sprinkler Systems: 1.55 NOTE: • Add 0.5 percent to total cost for each story over three. •• Deduct 11 percent for mini -warehouses. ••• Deduct 20 percent for shell only buildings. (EVALDATA.LSTJ Eft 0 Glen R. Posusta AMAX Self Storage LLC 36 Dundas Road Monticello MN 55362 April 21, 1997 Monticello City Council Members Monticello MN 55362 Dear Council Members: 1 would like to thank you for giving me this opportunity to address what 1 believe is a serious issue in the building permit fee structure. I am the President/Owner of AMAX Self Storage LLC of Monticello. We are a fledgling service company started to supply a basic need for the people of Monticello and it's surrounding area. This need was never more evident than during the recent evacuation of the flooding River Terrace mobile home park. The issue I have is with the way the permit fees are determined in the building department. When 1 constructed the first 3 buildings, I was asked to supply a sworn construction statement to ascertain the cost of the buildings. The permit fees were based on a percentage of that amount according to it's type of construction. My previous buildings were in the $60,000 range, and the permit fees cost between $850 to $950. Now, during the recent construction of the 4th building, with a cost of just over $80,000, my permit fee was 51,430. The fee, as 1 was told by the previous building official. Joe, was based on a schedule put out by the state in which all fees are based. This schedule said my building SHOULD cost $140,000. 1 explained to Joe that my building would not cost $140,000, $100,000 or $90,000 but somewhere around $80,000. He told me that after the building was completed and 1 could prove that, with paid bills, the cost of the building, he would probably make an adjustment. This information has been supplied to Fred and Rick with no adjustment. After battling with Joe for 2 % months to get a building permit (which should have been issued in 3 daysl) and with winter on my heels, l paid the exorbitant fee, with the hopes of an adjustment. Now, Joe is no longer with the city and I must deal with Fred. He said that we must go by lite book, and that's all there is to it — end of discussion. 1 noted that the permit cost is one thing and I could live with it's unfair rate, but what about property taxes? 1 don't want to be overly taxed on a $140,000 building that costs only $8300. Fred assured me that it would not happen, tax assessors base their taxes on comparables and the assessor would probably tax me for the $83,000. My questions for you council, is if my property tax is based on comparable costs, why is the permit based on some data in a book for some other area? This rationale defies logic( 0 I cannot in good conscious let this excessive fee slide because if the assessors see that 1 paid a fee on a $140,000 building and didn't question it - then it must be a $140,000 building. Please help me resolve this matter because I am sure 1 am not the only one in town receiving this unjust overcharge on the permit fees. 1 would like the fee charges to go back to the way they were prior to 1996, which in my mind were more fair and equitable. Things in the building department used to have some logic and rationale - now there seems to be no rhyme nor reason to some of the edict handed down to citizens going to the city department looking for guidance and advice to do the right thing. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to a favorable resolution to this problem. 71men ly, Posusta President/ er /f,,.,t f Srl S •L.�s,2 ., 03/25/87 13: IS 0310 692 3853 ICBO CLIST SVC BUILDING VALUATION DATA 002/002 ds aa1r.R of r.nwse 6ui1dN al6cidl. Bud6K SWAT -6 aka 6r fwlbrrfrla 6 Aft V&Wldan dea AIP-M rS a•QaW Cale for Taal 6WIdNp. rwldwdal Wid.ID an d1e moa rarmal fa marry [Rees. 1w pot der& m m... 'w de.., c b •wwrw cw=ulsim wd do uow Ia .good.- ^Ow:ars dloldd d rnWe tar rp.ei atchiurnral w .award baa a11d do to ubw M Or proje0, Kw- a loww unit caro my a61n muft n.,. cab m fn4rdd Io cbn pIf with de de6d14n d Yd.e4ry' 4 S.Olae IM d dw 1994 U A-- SWI&V Co*' and dee 6.ckdf wdl6.aral. amc- ewd. d0M[d, pelf 40d Irndrwrnl work m" a apKW"ly 450d below. The untl COO adp 6dde dw marecoon p G4 which Lhoutl m 6. Meed. TM dMM"dw d 0&n dwd bo b prgeaa r.wwed M dw VOwn"nd CalAm" d 9WI&n Of dale win be 66f W as vOuxwn myuad ban aloe . weltch wcr. aobMad in Ayr9199L ._. R I. APART►IWT FFOUIMS+ f.0.•______ $77.20 � (G0aO $9420 Type a 65.20 TypeV-43tod Fl-__ 55.50 IG0od1$71.30 Type I--Bafanwtt Lambe 72.50 2. AUDITORIUMS+ Type I a n f.0...__...__. 91 AO TVP. IL-I�W1r ___._.. 66.00 Typo II_N._..._._._._ 62,60 rA_ UHI• 4"t, 69.60 Type n1 --N ________..... 66.00 Type V -14,6x ... ........ 66.50 _.. Type V-A _._.__._._. 62,00 S. DAMM, Type I a II fJL•__...._ 129.00 po I Ty1-141x+ __..._._. 95.00 92.00 Type IU -1 -MM ...____ 106.60 Type U3 -N......_...__._._. 101.20 Type V-1 4110W ____... 95.00 Type V --N __.___._.... 91.00 ' f1ON.-w AILEY$r Type IH141ox ___.__. 44.40 Type INIV.__._._.......... 41..•.0 Type III-144pur _..___.. 46.30 TVP. IU -N..__._..._.._ 45.20 type V -1 -Mw 32.60 C C"URCHM Typ. Ia R F.R. ___._.___ 66.50 Type l_I41st ..... ... .._ 6420 Type 11--14 _...._._....__ 61.60 TVpe 14-14+wr ___..... 70.60 Type W --N _._____..__. 67.50 TVpe V -1 -Ilse..___...... 66.00 Type Vim/ ------------ 62.00 6. CONVALB0MOSHTAW Type I or III .IL• F..._.____ 121.20 type 6-1a1ao _..__.. _. 04.00 Type 01-1 •Ibur .__...... 66.70 lyp 6111) 0••4..ra-467. /.w. -Q. 7. DWELLINGS: .......... 56600 OG� � Type V -W -d Frain.._ 5170 (Loom $80.60 Ser "ItIidlLd ......_._. 1730 ICood) $2030 Urd01Wwd _._ _._.. 17.60 (GOod) S'5.40 C. FCR$ STATION& Typ. 1 a 6 F.R ...... -_._. 99.80 Type u -1410a.._.__.. 65.40 7yp. ......... _. _ __. 61.80 764 UI -1.4x73.._....... 71.60 67.10 Type V -N ........_.._._... 61.00 9. HOMES FOR TNF ELOMM Type I at U F.R.-...____. 9050 Type 11-141oa .....___. 75..50 T�'De U�'1__.__.._.__. 70.20 Type M-1 44W _....... . 16.40 Type ut N..._. _-_._.. 1330 TyP• V -1 -HW._-....... 7400 Type V-44 __.__......__. 71.20 18, "OSPITAL3: Typa I or II F.R.'__.___... 147.30 Type Ill -1 d-Ioru .......- 117.60 Type V -1 -of w............ 112.30 11. HOTELS AND MOTI S: Type .00 Type 766630 Type I11 -V ................ _ 77.70 Type V-1.11ou ...__._. 66.20 two V -N ._._._.._.._... 63.00 IL INDUSTRIAL PLANTS[ Type I a U F.R.._.._.___ 49.60 7yp. 11-1 J4ou .....__.... 3450 11--4 . _. _. _ _......... 31.60 a-14ftw ......_.._. woo ism 26.00 15.70 Type V-44 ._.._.__....... 32.60 13. $ABS1 Typ. 1 a U F3..___.._f 156.60 Type 111_144ftw ...._.- 126.60 Type V-1Jb1r.._..__ 95.00 14. 1.12 RR& Type 10111 F.R. _..._.._.. 101.40 Typ O-I�/an __...___ 14.20 Type ll -N__.._....__ 70.60 Type 76-50 Type ul--N..._._.._.___ 74A0 Type V-121oa.___._ 73.70 7,A. V_ -N ..._..-... _...... 70.60 IS. h9DWAL ORICfS: Typ.l or II F.R•..___._ 104.00 TypeSM30 Type 11-N_._.__._._ 76.40 Two a-14bx _..__.._ 64.30 61.00 Typo V_I+klo_.._..._ 76.60 Type V --N ...... 75.60 16. OffICZr ; Type I or U FR. ............ 93,00 TVpa 0-1+kv ._......._ 6230 Type 11-_N_._..__..._.___ S9Ao Type IU-141ox .__..... 67AO T19• UI --N ..... _._..__ 64.20 Type V-14 W. _..__..__ 61.00 T,w V -II _._......_._ 59.40 17. PRIVArl GARA0 S; Wood Fraena .._.___..... 21.50 _..__._. 23.60 Open _._..-..__.._.. 14.40 /& R36UC BUILDING& Typ. l a 11 F.R.•..__..._ 107.50 Type 11_141ox ...._._.. 67370 Type IF --N __._....__._._ 65.30 Type IU-144pw 90.40 Type 67.30 TyP• V-1440. ____ _. 62.60 Type V_N ._.-..._..._._ 79.60 19. PUBLIC GARAGES. 7yp.1 a 11 F6.•._._...._. 42.40 Type 1 a U Open ►arbr�' 32.00 TWO IL_N. __......_.___ 25.00 T,Oe 111-1 J4pf. ...... 32.70 Type 1U44_ ._..... 2650 Trp. V-lf/w__..._2930 •Ada 0.i pec.. u Low - 6r oKh MO we des ••OAKI 20 aoce4 I- e.60e1 W"11111L 0.9aTN. f. Aw..ft 20. ILMAURANFS: FamTsyyhh4nia TyM nil ebur ___.._... $64.90 TTp Ul-N...._.__.._._.... 62.00 Typ. 77.60 Type V -N ..__...... ....... 7490 21. SCHOOLS: wr.- Type I a 11 F.R. ____..... 97.00 0..79 66.00 094 0,92 1020 0.91 67.30 Type V_1 -Hu 1S'M V --N _._....._____ 66.20 67.20 22. fERVKF SUT1061& 61d161w __._......__...... Typo If -N._„._____..... 36.60 Type Ill--1144ow ..........- 61.00 Type V-14bur._..-. .... _......_...... 52.00 24.40 22. STOREfr Type 1 a U f. R.-. 7120 Typ 16 -1 -Hour _..... __. 44.00 Yype Ul-1•Nour .._.__. 4220 53.40 Type IU -N _.......____. 50.2n 1 ryp V-41ar....__._. 45.00 TyP. V�IV ____.__....._.. 41.50 24. THEATER& Type I or U F.R..__._........ 93.70 Iype 1u-141ar ._.......... 69.70 IUB.-...._.......__ V -1-M. ........ ._. 66.30 65.60 V. -N _........___... 62-00 23. wARFNOU56•••: Type Ian FR. ........... .... 43.00 Type U a V -1440x.__. 25.50 0 a V -H...._._..-. 2400 Ma 14bx _... 29A10 tll-N._ _......... 27.70 Q7yUp L AIR CONOITION119G: 2.60 O..ur.i.1 1.00 SPRV491ER SYSTEMS.__ I.On '••Baro 11 plrrw. ow .eAl-w..hour f111<•Lowu MOON R$ Th.11I nWIMnL p wearrrvM.a b w= le arex..lfow wle dr 6 "N to wJuahn a-1. wabw cell. 44.1.WdILk . nW qui. MAw..laa6cLaorw. Ta r ere..o0- new nl4lpr er 11ve a. f.1 Lawn. m a w wmrl.. gdael sodNrA Lar aanelo. a etMn ar ap d. TIP. D dellox Mwd 6rY417 d 4wp Lail -U. Iw dr. Sow. waw Lf hr Rc3ew.I M.dif. 040 o d .re tow 6- vArb eo. $7621h 0 90 . 7620 o 541= womal ae 1r. ra.4e Saw mum UJ. Mod30N 130 FamTsyyhh4nia 0.95 [Mebwal....._._._....._. _. 0.64 DaAa d Co6rrfbN -_ 027 farN 0.14 10931111pe......_._.--.__ 0.60 wr.- 07 A4wYlaM___..............._ 0..79 usa.$ us. 094 0,92 Al6C0ea._____ ..._.._._ 0.91 7� 0.ro Naw vok CAY ...__. 1.16 61d161w __._......__...... 067 Wee ....._.._.-_..."..» 020 Ra um UJI. (CML) Meamw 130 FamTsyyhh4nia 0.96 dM..._._.-_._...._ 021 Wade Wend..-•-_-._. _. 0.94 farN 0.70 10931111pe......_._.--.__ 0.60 090 wpinu.r a=_ , 0v usa.$ us. 0.00 Al6C0ea._____ ..._.._._ 0.73 0.ro DcYafs._r«. _ 0.67 61d161w __._......__...... 0.67 Wee ....._.._.-_..."..» 020 6pSRF•--.�..__...-_, 0.74 BUILDING MN 1996 COMM US. IpMLl 66adow 130 0.63 Lar1 flwlelayo__._._.. 9e _ 0.64 Mwrwm.. ___..--... 026 MONS" Nee 071 090 0.7$ 0.00 020 DcYafs._r«. _ 0.76 WL•oa1Re._.....-.-_-• ROS Wa= U.$. M6edlRer A W b _._..___. __._....... 130 0.63 Lar1 flwlelayo__._._.. 1.13 _ 0.94 1.14 0.110 MONS" Nee 8.79 ._'. �'- ' o:� Council Agenda - 4/28/97 o Aid .ration of incresiging s nit *y sewer access fee. W.O., R.W., F.P., J.S.) A REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider increasing the sanitary sewer access fee unit charge (SAC) from the current level of $1,500. Attached you will find information on SAC fees charged by other communities. City staff is in the process of collecting development cost information on other fees so as to provide Council with a comprehensive understanding of Monticello's development expenses as compared to other communities. We are making every effort to get this information to you as soon as possible to assist you in your decision making. In the meantime, Council may wish to act immediately on the SAC fee without additional comprehensive data. Following is comparative data on SAC charges in neighboring communities: Becker $ 600/unit St. Michael 3,300/unit Elk River 1,300/unit Buffalo 3,700/unit Big Lake 2,300/unit B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to increase the SAC fee from $1,500/unit to a number selected by Council and hold off increasing other fees until a comprehensive comparative analysis is completed. Under this alternative, City staff will send a notice to builders that the fee will increase at a date 60 days from the date of the adoption of the fee change. This will provide builders the notice necessary to adjust sale prices of lots/homes, etc. City staff will continue to work on development of the fee study with the goal of providing a comprehensive report as soon as possible. The risk of selecting this option is increasing fees too high relative to the market place. Motion to table an increase in the SAC fee and hold off increasing other fees until u comprehensive comparative analysis is completed. N Council Agenda - 4/28/97 Under this alternative, Council prefers to table action to raise fees pending completion of the comprehensive analysis of development costs in the city. Council could take the view that it is important to determine Monticello's development costs relative to other communities prior to making large fee increases. It is somewhat important that Monticello remain competitive with other communities with regard to overall cost of development. This understanding will not be available until we look at all fees. The risk of this alternative is waiting too long to start collecting the fees resulting is a loss of potential fees. Currently, the City is processing about five building permits per week, which would not be paying the increase if the City waits. By the time that the fee actually goes into effect, the number of permits per week may be higher. If one looks at the SAC fee only as compared to other cities, it appears reasonable to increase the fee to a range somewhere between $2,000 and $3,000. If the fee was increased to $2,600 from the $1,600 current amount, it is recommended that the entire $1,000 increase be designated toward debt retirement. This would result in $1,600 of the $2,500 fee being earmarked toward debt payments. Perhaps it would make sense to take our chances and raise the SAC fee at this time based on the understanding of this fee relative to other communities. In the meantime, City staff will be examining development expenses across the board to help the Council to determine whether or not to increase other fees. As an end product of our study, we would like to be able to compare the coat to develop a single family home in terms of site development and building permit costs. Similarly, we would like to be able to compare the cost to develop an industrial site. Unfortunately, time has not allowed us to complete this in-depth analysis prior to Council consideration of the SAC fee. Survey results. COUNCM INFORMATIONAL ITEM CUpdnte on s w r honk up fee surveys. MV) Since the previous Council meeting, Public Works Director John Simola has been working on getting information from surrounding communities on their sanitary sewer hookup fee rate structures for the Council to review when considering possible changes to our hookup schedules. Joha had intended to compile the survey results and have on this agenda for Council consideration a fee adjustment, but I asked him to simply prepare the survey results he had obtained so far and include them with this agenda for the Council to look at over the neat few weeks. The basic reason I had asked John to wait on this item was that I thought it may be appropriate for the Council to look at all of our fee structures for new construction at the same time to see whether adjustments are warranted in other areas such as building permit fees, sewer and water hookup charges, sanitary sewer or water acreage charges, and any other fees that might affect the total cost of building in Monticello. While I certainly understand that the City has already committed to a $14.5 million wastewater treatment plant project and it is important to adjust the sewer hookup fees as soon as possible to begin to generate revenue for this project, 1 think it is also beneficial for the Council to get a feel for the whole picture of what the fees are to feel comfortable that if we raise other fees in addition to sewer hookup charges that we don't raise them all too high to where we stop development entirely. City staff is working on obtaining survey results kom other communities on all various fees charged by other communities and will be presenting this information to the Council at the first meeting in April. Hoosw.upo: 3MM 9# l � CITY OF MONTICELLO SEWER & WATER HOOKUP CHARGE SURVEY t wrrrrawnm rorl.�now• . - .. rte. rrr •r ,1r ! n Yaw OM1'..11aYN6 COYMMM1, n, � .!\ A\ nf\ M r .!\ Y..•a.\.\t1re1. t.1•. r... \\•1r! rra•rnr. ww .ovu wr.wlr .� • w r trr ■ran urr\ 1 r revY r r ww...our rwer.xer arrr, br rw\ w s— rr.t r•.n um .au\r•w rw• lrr um wrncrw..,.n •tr •mr Born \ 1r•\r a .aw rw,r1 Yqr erre, Nr ur w\ w rrrn r r r .rn mw r w v1m wu ur rre. wn \ ruwrtw,u\ ra\rr� r re eY,ort• ore •roe.•1Y w, •rut r raw \.r w n• ere 1rw •r1 w.es •m. e.m. n rw r. o.. \1 r rr1 rtrlr w rorw\A ro oe,olrr ! 1rr, ro r. a1r\m\erw r •••rr ram m rau ur ro oererw.! ••r rover o wn mor \ .croal r •orrr w r rae or rlw• n \ rro a wr r .r1r w\lY.1Wl Wlrrrl t10M1Y erf 1 Mr\ •rc e.1\rno wr • ry,•atOM\wMrOr\rU 11U1rr Yrn�Y•\rb r•r wYlrf Yn Yp YIraAD rrlleMrarl.ar lA\Mete r A\ IrbM\\YbF •b !•Y.\.rMArb rYrr M[lbY. r !!r\Mtr 1l rraw. w\4,\ w4r Mrreb \ellrlr Utm rrlM rry M(IR M.1vre . \ M r • Jr\ etaw• Wrr 4r\tX r11.r r w \.e..r �1 mYYeC rt/P Y b e1r 4 'w..rrr! 111 H rr �vt \ rvr • 1 1rr Cr W.mt 1M rnl 1 rr • 7 um\ Neper 1 W • 1 rr r -W..o r\re "m.mYrt \oD M \ . 1 W CI Wren W Irv. 1 rr • 7 r•r 1r\eer 160 -WO rt rt w.errt rr.• —bGrrr rr.L1 awe e•r.00r•aeY mCr•.r r.rreaoe 1•a N0�!0•M!m _�1e l r. w e►o•rwe pry\• a e•rrterle er wrnr rrwr\ r 11\w ti \� rr\er r ler mmplrrw or mm at o mew r mons ar.rnrmr t. WW XWM\Y\WY Mr oYJ2e1 =1 r MNYYO rY aorn(.11l n roll( rrrf p�rY I1rN1 i .,rarwwtarrreUlw[Mv Orli 0 .,lr n.w rr .,,.. •r nn !.n r.alr UT. •OrOVrr fprrsrrrrT rt\ .!t n1 rt.s rt\ Ar 1 !n• rut uTrlY•• s .n rr wr. •!! ��Ir r.rrr w.l .0 roTr \ K.clN fillrr�l 1�rMM. u1 W I.Ms. rr Nr lTrtr. •>f It•u�rrr�1� RWI,r,lR .r1 rnI.TM .�,rn 1 1 iil I i I�rMM .rt � I��n.� Mr rwn Ifs• 1 t r r rnwl.. r.rrunr 1 rsrr .. uM r•rT r�our wrin cans .a rw rr rr•!\rn r rltrlo\r.�ur. mawA1. rw .«•ITtY•11//1 tart• rn nnrrr • w.r rlarrr! w.! ar � rr• \urn , !wT •aw a .a, r! ro nnrrr wrsr.o. v ,.n �...•.. -.. « r1�11 nr rrrw n wn •o � rc•m tar .r.rar rn a1�1 lotrwrr raw w arYr.! IrllYrtM1 (Y •MaI, MOrr\IY. lT(T rrror rrru •um rmrr.•. •..Vrn. u... \ a.au ani • rrr! •ar \ ru nw. rwrrrr � w! w1 .u\r <r ru�l..olrinr Rut war o.wr rw rr rlr rwlal ..1. 11u•n.!lrr...aw • caml rn•.sru Is.uo Imr. ralr • uuw••rrinr.w m. lolw ^rprarltrwst� MNYYO rY aorn(.11l n roll( rrrf p�rY I1rN1 i .,rarwwtarrreUlw[Mv Orli 0 Z V am 030719' o IM/r� 9. OOo9:rl10.10a1R' ROR•9 D~Toww f 1 r.Nl •.dl• aTr• Tpy/,l.�r ., . w , e.. Rrw.ary .awo•Ra corwll•m ur wf n. • rlf. MTlDfMT41.lOM II.R. fFOI! I.Itr XOR!•MIRI .OQD WI.•.Rs Mhi fMKM T •. ..NIM.OIIII •TYII!•lLISM OMMOl1 99.c r iM !•1•o W!••, 1• N•!rr lr, • ..N19101l Mr IUl.tflM arwl 9900 •[r !,r [r.Y ..lr.n [�+ i•1.MIR1M1tAi • •ORII[fllO1TORRN/i fl lM iY/W1• OlA •lpMlYl Nrl MIIN1R.d!• fell llW lRITlRN IDTV•••11 .plOMw TtfIrN1 ro OT/Rr/ . wrl 9iT 9. rTIW NN9T9 OT91•n Rw TIlp�OY r Rw1Ta9W m.Ou u99b4T9R9r1 11l M•1�99 a WTf .OR A 9010•. MM A$ AOM "J•1 f.f m •pl y1R. Rrn.ulwl uw RM.1110•TR•L 9xl r9RA.v • m.afN9.lMraR .9N T�.•1 1011 Rf 0119 i117M WI711 for a YO�f .or r .!• wur 9AW r MTRWM �� w• r•1119.n rl ewv. lua.w+ url•ar. ��,•r•Rw Tawlrl9 ••• •r•w• nR M Mrrw n 19r r•M 1fr1�11.•• NM.I1 rR •IIYR 9w9 r fr �s.r• Tr n•..,r r1r9! r.• N r•M r.o rr9T �O.fT • r 1Rlwl 1••!•9! w..[ •9e, A Z V am 030719' o IM/r� 9. OOo9:rl10.10a1R' ROR•9 D~Toww Sewer & Water Hookup Charge Survey • e Cities Surveyed h c O"COgrWctwK ren MW 9F Council Agenda - 4/28/97 ia 61 ,,, '�/,•N 1,; 1•, 1 ',•, City staff requests that the City Council consider handing the authority to administer state wetland regulations to the WCSC due to the complexity of the law and the opportunity to delegate the wetland law administration to a State- funded organization. Since 1991, the City of Monticello has been the local governing unit (LGU) in charge of regulating wetlands. The City accepted this responsibility based on the view that staff time was available to be properly trained on the requirements of the law and because the City would have more control over the administration of the law and associated interpretations. Since 1991, the City has successfully enforced the requirements of the 1991 law requiring no net loss of wetlands. There have been no significant problems in administration of the Wetland Act. However, it is clear that wetland law and regulations are ever-changing, and we have found it difficult to keep up with the requirements of the law and the technical aspects of the administration of the law. The cost in time necessary to be fully trained in the proper administration of the law far exceeds the number of times that training is actually put to use. In addition, in our contacts with WCSC, staff has found the organization to be very knowledgeable and reasonable with regard to enforcement of the wetland act; therefore, it appears that potential concerns over possible future conflicts with interpretation of the law as it applies to development are unfounded. A primary purpose of the WCSC is to provide wetland law administrative support to area communities. WCSC staff is well trained in the administration of the act and deals with it on a day-to-day basis. Motion to appoint the WCSC as the 1991 Wetland Act LGU (Local Governing Unit) for tho city of Monticello. Under this alternative, the City will provide all silo plans and plats to WCSC for review and comments when wetlands are impacted. WCSC will be responsible for completing technical review of plans, which includes delineation of wetlando, evaluation of efforts to avoid wetlands, and establishment of wetland mitigation plans. They will also be responsible for administration of and processing of notices required in conjunction with mitigation plans. This service is free of C charge. Developers will be required to pay a nominal fee for WCSC services. Council Agenda - 4/28/97 Projects affected immediately by this change include John Leerssen's Cardinal Pond. No other projects are affected at this time. Motion to deny appointment of the WCSC as the 1991 Wetland Act LGU (Local Governing Unit) for the city of Monticello. Council should select this alternative if it feels that having local interpretation and control of administration of the Wetland Act in the hands of City staff and Council. It is the view of the City Administrator that the time involved in obtaining and maintaining proper training in the administration of the Wetland Act is not justified by the few times that the training is needed. Experts are readily available at WCSC at no charge to the City. Furthermore, through our contacts with Kerry Saxton of WCSC, we have found that the organization follows a sound and reasonable interpretation of the law. We are, therefore, confident that appointing the WCSC as Monticello's LGU will not unduly compromise the City's authority. None. C lu ZIG)"M OIN&VIY:,VV;J 16 Council Agenda - 4/28/97 Change Order No. 2 involves the formal approval of Change Proposal Requests 1, 2, 3, 6, and 8. Change Proposal Requests 1, 2, and 3 have been previously separately approved by the City Council and include contract deducts of $21,042. Change Proposal Request No. 6 involves providing larger rebar on the gable end walls of the administration building at a cost of $350. Change Proposal Request No. 8 involves the breakup and removal of the large concrete retaining walls left on the Kruse Property. This was mentioned to the City Council at a previous meeting but no final numbers were discussed. The actual additional cost for breakup and removal of this concrete was $16,005. The difference between the decreases and increases are a net contract decrease of $4,687. A copy of the Change Order and Change Proposal Requests are included for your review. B. ALTFRNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative is to approve Change Order No. 2 for a net decrease in contract price of $4,687. 2. The second alternative would be not to approve Change Order No. 2. It is the recommendation of the City Administrator, Public Works Director, and Consulting Engineer, HDR, to approve Change Order No. 2 as outlined in alternative ql for a net decrease in contract price of $4,687. These changes do not increase the time requirements of the project. Copy of Change Order No. 2 and Change Proposal Requests 1, 2, 3, 6 and 8. Change Order No. 2 (Project NameMastewater Treatment Piaru Expansion (HDR Project No.: 08124-004-104 Project Owner. City Of Monticello, MN jOwrrels Project No.: 93.14C Eats of Issuance: 411597 Project Contractor Adobon and Peterson Date of Contract: 12/111% Contract Period: 17/1898 - 10/15/98 It Is agreed to modify the Contract referred to above as follows: Item No. Item and Description of Chanes Contract Price Contract Time Decrease Increase Decrease Increase 1 CPH No. 1 $9,052 0 days 0 days 1 CPR No. 2 54.500 0 days 0 days 1 CPR No. 3 $7.490 0 drive 0 dava 1 CPR No. 8 =350 0 days 0 days 1 CPR No. 8 $16.005 0 days 0 days Sub -Total £21042.00 $18335.00 0 drive 0 drive Difference Nei $4.087.00 $0.00 0 dove 0 days Summary: It Is agreed to modify the Contract referred to above as follows: Contract Price prior to this Change Order Contract Time prior to this Change Order IS 11,283,200 I Completion Data: Ocwher IS, 1998 I Nz::ncroa:o (decrease) of INs Clgango Order Not Increase (docrease) of this Chrr,gc Order I ($4.887.00) I 0 dove I Rovisod Contract Price with all approved Change Orders Rovisod Contract Time with al approved Change Orders IS 11,278,313 I Compiotion Data: Wooer IS, 1998 A The changes Included In this Change Order are to be accomplished in accordance with the terms, stipulations end conditions of the original Contract as though Included therein. 1 L �i/ic /7 7 PWdv.WIUey(HDREngif=flngjnc.) Dote rRP�2mr.-nc D % I l l/ I Approved for Owner by: Affoot Data I � I Approved: (Other • when required) Date Distribution: Uownw L_jCordiactor L_J011ioe UFiold UOthor PUKM III uslrV. leMfef 7w I= /r� el foal cglrrd. qwq M* r,V..y, k •-� FM H01r Enpnwrl q. Mc Change Proposal Request No. 1 (Not a Change Order) IProtect Nome: Wastewotet Treatment Plant EMOrW n I0~3 Project N0.93 -14C lRoject Owner: City of Monilcelo. MN IRegurotory Agency Project No. Of applicoble): IHDR Project No.: 08124-004.164 Iwtiated 8y: _ Engineer _ Contractor IConfractor. Adanson A Peterson x Owner I I Dole: 3/5/97 Attention: The fotbwktg change in the contract on tits project b proposed. A breakdown of cost SHALL be attached. Work stall not commence until authorhed by the Owner. Descdptton of the Proposed Change: Section 11992 - Sludge Applicator 1. Section 2.04 Et - Toolbar Dimensions: Change from 6' x 8' x 5/16' wall to 6' x 4' x 3/8' wall. 12. Section 2.04 E5 - Change '24 degree angle o1 departure' to '17 degree angle of departure'. I� I ATTACHMENTS: Nona All work shag be In accordance wlth the forms, stlpulotlom and condltlom of the original Contract Documonh. It tiro work horotn provided for b Approved by Change Ordor, the tlmo of complotlon wll be: Gsr _ Incroascd � Docroosod � Unchongod by —,C2 cotondol days, lhtsc9angBST i Add DodUCf _ Not Chng aO f 1 e l+ota X11119'7 Date ./ Owners Action: _ Accoptod _ Not Accoptod 4B23:K J. Poplln P.E. !t RocPT montlatbn: 1rE446 _ Do Not Rocommond o Acceptance IVInc. Data ---!' It1Y: tkOCe. IN /t8 CPR No. 1 Pago 1 lin Change Proposal Request No. 2 (Not a Change Order) JPMW Nam: Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Owner's Pr *O N0.93 -14C lProjeal Owner: Coy of Waftelo. MN lRepulatory, Agency Project No. (e aptokabre): JNDRProlectNo.:0812A-0pn-16A lWtIatedBy:_ Engineer —Contractor Contractor. Adourona Pstsrsor x 0wrW Date: 3/5/V7 Attamo : The following charge In the contract on this project It proposed. A breakdown of cost SHALL be attached. Work shall riot commence until authorized by the Owner. Description of the Proposed Change: Section 010601.06 - Pro)ect Photographs I� 1. Chen a the requirernents for project photographs in 1.06A to meet the conditions in the attached letter. I 1 / (ATTACHMENTS: A&P'e tatter of February 25, 1987 /-/ ) /) I /1l -,d- S4, l9y . ot�rt I PedIn P.E. AO work shall be In accordance with the terms Roeommondatlon: slipulotlom and condlhkom of the adginot Contract _ R9-1 _ Do Not Recommend Documents. If" work heroln provided forts Acceptance Approved by Ctwnge Order, the lane of completion wAbe: 8Y: NORincreased _ Docreored )L unchanged I3 bs__calAdd daD. Onto This change 0O _Add Deduct By: Cfwrgo " 14 i By - *doom Pe r pate 'ill( f-7-11 Doto 1 ,� Ownees Action: `• ( _ Accepted _ Not Accepted 11 cw ka< 17_l,� Change Proposal "M k Request No. 3 (Not a Change Order) (Project Norse: Wastewater Treatment Rout Expardon [Owners RWect sIo .91140 I Project Owner. CIN of MOntketlo. MN IRegubtary Agency Project No. (iloppIcal*): [HDR Project No.: 081244OD4164 IlNnated By: X Pnghm _ Contractor Icontractor: Adoe.an at Peterson I owner I Date: 3/5/97 Mtentim The fo0owtrtg change In the contract on this project Is proposed. A breakdown of cost SHALL be attached. Work shall not commence until authorized by the Owner. De=dpffon of the Proposed Change: Section 11322 - Grit Removal Eauloment - Grit Washer 11. Section 2.02 At: Channe references of '321 stainless steel ' to *316 stairdess steer I l ATTACHMENTS: Lakeside's 12/27196 letter to Blddln fe Co eters J. Peplin P.E. AB work shall be In accordonce with Mo toffm Hppp R—ocommandcrilm stipulations. and condltbns of the odghat Contract Roc nd _ Do Not Recommond Documents. If the work horeln provided for b o Accoptanco Approved by Change Order. the t4no of complotlon will y� bo: H5 Ire. _ Increosod _ Decreased _K Unchongod by �_ oatondor days. Data thhetgngowl0_Y,; _Add Deduct _ Not Change I �" n .ao �Br• atrp . ncd�Y BrAorson Paterson Date 30f( %q"7 Doie ✓ Owners Action: L_ Accepted _ Not Accoptod 11D CPR No. 3 Page 1 110e �KYe. Yc ITR J 1997 ,pF t.idt,tw�lny. im. IftlectName: WottewaterTreokrxWPlantExpordw Proles Owner Oty Of MoPolceft Ase IHOR Robd No.: 081244M4.164 Aclabon Q tgtonon Change Proposal Request No. 6 (Nat a Change Order) IOwners Prof ct N0.73.14C IRegt4otary Agency Prolect No. Of aporoable): Iwnated Br X_ E+onew-Controctor I owner hxre: ar 1119]• Aftdcrc The fotlowhg change h the contract on thio p(gect Is proposed. A breckdow n of coat SHALL be attached. Work shall not commence ue19 outhorhed by the Owner. Description at the Proposed Change: Rebar-Adfnlnstratlon Buildlna 1. Provide larger rebar on the feeble end wafts per the comments on Shop Dwp Transmittal No. 2 D.M. R4. I I IATrACHMENTS: NO,r/e All work that bo to occordonco with tho terrtn stlpWctionm and condi"" of tho original Contract Doeuments. If tho work horoh proAdod for Is Approved tyy ChorVo Order. the firm Of contpl0HOn 190 bo: w _ inuoased _ Docroaod -k Unettanged L by calendar day►. Date 1Ntetwngo m: Add _ Doduet _ Not Change 4�n W.d potemon r Date I urII4, oae / Ch~I Action: ✓ACceptod _ Not ACCoptod J. Poplin P.E. _ Oo Not Rocomrnond Accoptanco itc MOR 1�_ ing. a IProfect Nome: Wastewater Treatment Ptmt tmornton Project Owner: Cry of rrlorftelo. MN p,DR Project No.: 08124404-1e4 Icontrackm Aaoftw & Paterson I Change Proposal Request NO. S (Not o Change Order) 10.rnees Project No.93-14C IRegutatory, Agency fkoject No. (If ap0cable): IwMated By:_ Ermghew X Contractor I owner IDate: 3/21/97 Aflentlorc The following chwoe In the contract on this project Is proposed. A breakdown of cost SHALL be attached. Work shall not commence until authorized by the Owner. Description of the Proposed Change: Concrete Debris 1. Remove the excavated concrete debris at the project site and dispose at Barton's 1pft. located In Montloelk). 12. No time extension to the contract Is required. I13. No addtional Imported fill Is required fo balance the earthwork quantities. �( I ATTACHMENTS: A& P's 3110197 letter � / By : obert . Peplin P.E. AR wont shalt bo In occordanco with the termsRocommendatlon ctlpulatfons, and condltlom of tho original Contract � RorgrVVgond_ Documonts. If the work heroin providod for Is Approved by Chongo Order. tho Elmo of compotlon wd 4 be: Ry: H' _ Incroasod _ DocromW X Unchwngod I by colondW days. fore This ctwngo wM: X Add _ Doduct _ Not Chongo' . I Byl � 3&.714ran orO 1 Onto ZOwnses Action: ptod _ Not Accepted _ Do Not Rocommond lance //P BRC FINWIIIL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO /23/91 09155:40 Schedule of Bills C1O50"..-VD`.30 COVERPAIZ CL540R Report 5*1*ctiunl RLM GROUP... DM23 CO/KITT... APRIL 73 DISB DATA -9-I1) 011TH COMMENT ------------ D-04221951-042 APR 23 0158 M Inst—tic-i Jobq Delver Copi" Fore Printer Hold Space LPI Lim* CPI J 02 SCEO H 5 6 066 10 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MNTiCELLo �In/73/97 0 (Z9155.55 Sch.60. 0f BMA CLS407-VO4.30 PACE 1 `I%gyp MIAI! DESCRIPTION MOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUO 0 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PON F/P ID LINE A.E. MICHAELS PAINT/PAWS 30.97 BUILDING TEPAIP SUPPLIES 101.45701.]]30 047 00078 7.99 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.45701.7199 047 00079 33.16 MNOOR TOTAL ALBINSON, INC. 949.07 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.43110.70" 591941,594746 047 00197 57.11 SHILL TOOLS \ EQUIPMENT 101.43115.7410 594907 047 00190 74.41 MISC OPERATINC SUPPLIES 101.43115.2199 594903 047 00196 475.54 1VENOOP TOTAL MERICAN PACINC OF MINE 7tO5-.!1/7152-RC 10.30 TELEPHONE. 601.49440.3210 047 00171 1109-17 35.07 TELEPHONE 602.49490.3210 047 Dot T2 7902-AN CTRL 91.59 7ELEF/OIE 101.42701. 3210 042 00173 7156-JS 9.19 TELEPHONE 101.44110.3210 042 00174 7150-U 9.19 TELEPHONE 101.47401.5710 047 00175 7130-JL 9.19 TELEPHONE 10t.45201.3210 042 00176 1794-TB 9.19 TELEPOME 101.45115.3710 047 00111 7150101 9.19 TELEPONE 101.43120.3710 042 00178 190.99 -VENDOR TOTAL -IATEO VE TE.1— CL IUINANISIA 191.51 .1. PROFE6SIONAL .111.0 101.4]101.5199 202402,FA5T0 047 00037 DLANICN'S PEPSI COLA COI POP FOR RESALE 952.15 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 012 OW23 BRAUN INTCRTEC CORPOIUII W 2N1/NDUCE PAD TIG7 496.'15 PRM SVC-ENCINIIRINC FA 101.43110.3035 00365 042 OOIOB OUFALO CLINIC FMYOICAL-1 OONSTAD 04.50 MHGC OTIOR EXPNSE 101.43115.43" [90/6037 042 OOD59 CAMPBELL PEI COMPANY FET CLPPEIE5 433.07 MISC 0714P EXPENSE 101.42101.4599 49086 047 00195 CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS COPY MACJ41NE MAIM AEJO.E 60.OD MAINIt NNICE ACIEE7lMIS 211.45501.3190 075/1552 04] 00194 I.FLLULAR 2000 OF Sl CLa LA 219 0415 05.13 IILEPOE 101.42101.8710 M2 OOD71 FO 310-001 0.29 TILIVIM 101.42201.5710 042 00015 Hn 719 0114 11.71 TELEF"m 101.43115.5210 042 07074 MT 219-1110,12 0.14 TELLPHOE 601.40440.3710 047 00071 104.29 AYEN1m TOTAL vi to PON[ CHUM (FP) 31.90 MIC. OPERATING 90KIIS 101.0W1.21M 047 00015 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MORT RCELLO ��J11pp/73/97 09155155 S hwkilP 0 Bill. CLS40R-VM.30 PAGE 1 EMOR HAFE O(SCRIPT IDN AHIUR ACCO/T MAZE FUD, 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE P09 F/P 10 LIME CENTRAL MCCOIWN, INC. 71.48 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43171.7199 5A4809 047 00014 C ITY OF OAFTACO OIL FOR TM KETTLE 104.37 LQUIPMET IMPAIR PARTS 101.43170.7710 047 00063 CCMFVTER PARTS P S;.11VICE NFY4 HARD DRIVE 334.50 COMITER EQUIPMENT 101.41970.5707 NMM63 047 00160 AFYA` SERVICE CODICH 73.01) PROF SRV - DATA PROCESSI 101.41110.3090 P96M63 047 00161 INSTALL FARTS 0009 40.00 PROF SRV - DATA RADCESSI 101.41970.3090 PM4175 041 00167 f009/9DOEM 6 GO ADM 319.50 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 101.41970.5707 P154175 017 00163 719.00 AUEIOOR T07AL CONSOLIDATED COW DIRECT AN DIRECTORY 48.50 AOVERRTISING 601.49754.3499 2451874 062 00098 CRCSTEEL TRACK EQUIPMENT TAICP PARTS 76.71 VEHICLE AFPAIR PARTS 101.43170.7711 130146,130371 047 00080 CULL CAR RN STAIAT(R SOFTNER 73.86 RENTAL IIOIASE EKRNUS 740.49701.4381 047 ODD60 O / 1 I'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 108.67 M15C OPLMTIMC SUPPLIES 101.43170.7199 Gm 067 00090 OhQ. EIMEA DISIAIBUIINC BEER 3,719.15 BEER Wo. 49150.7570 M7 000•A 9.60 RISC TAMABLE 609.41011T50.7540 047 00011 S. 7k. 75 BE[R 609.41150.7570 8706/87168 047 00054 139.70 RISC TAMABLE 600.49750.7140 8706/02169 047 00055 19.634.70 •4YfIl00R TOTAL DRIVERS LICelGE GUIDE Nil 10 CNIQ OAI[M 71.95 RISC OPERAI INC LUPPI IES 609.4116.1199 139649 047 00105 DINA SYSTOM PARTS 410.67 HIGC ORTRA71NG GIPRIES 101.41171.7190 183198 047 00009 LV LR3 6 ASSOC, INC RIBLI MFG RIGS 167.50 RISC POFEBS101AL G(TVIC 319.4301.9199 047 00166 T 1-77 51/.50 M16C PIINEWONAL GERVIC 713.4377.7199 041 00187 11F 1-I/ 105.00 RISC PROF(GSIONAL GERVIC 713.4317.1190 047 00188 6!.00 AVLA610P TOTAL I Am II/JOA C 9 NALNJI, 718 FRD(1 600.00 MIGC P1,100I5510KILL URVIC 719.4301.1199 047 00033 ,9 •ORI Tf COI1R04, INC. 1� C'MMICAl6 45.00 C/EHICAL RIOOIACTO 60/.4640.7160 1192 062 00107 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO /23/97 09155155 ScA4A11• of Bill• CL54OR-VO4.30 PACE 3 VENDOR NATE DESCRIPTION ADLINT AUOINFT KNE FLID 6 ACCOLIT CLAIM INVOICE P08 F/P 10 LINE FEEDRITE CONTROLS, INC. MATER TESTS 24.00 0115C PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49440.3199 7664.8386 042 00106 69.00 *VENDOR TOTAL FIRSTAR BANK AGENT FEES 87B TIF BID 266.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 355.47001.6201 042 00019 AGENT FEES 93A REFUND BD 260.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 379.41001.6201 042 00020 526.00 *VTOOR TOTAL FLICKER'S T.V. 6 APPLIAN 1ARS-8113C 19.59 MISC OPERATING SUPPL IFS 101.42401.2199 042 DOW G 8 K SERVICES LM IFORS/RC-JM 67.52 UNIFORI RENTAL 602.49490.4170 042 00110 LINIFORTS/Rc-w 89.12 UNIFORM RENTAL 601.49440.4170 042 00111 LMIFOR S -JS 25.16 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43110.4170 282 00112 L.MIFORIS/EO,TB 93.28 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43115.4110 042 00113 LINIi0f9L5/6TIEET6 M.36 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43120.4170 042 00114 LINT FORLS/PARKS-JL 38.36 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.45201.4170 042 00115 SNIP PACS 21.09 MI6C OPERATING SLIPL IES 101.43127.2199 042 00116 RICS/MV 32.51 REPAIR 6 MTC - BUILDINGS 101.41990.4010 042 00117 ENVIRONMENTAL 73.59 M1/C OMR EXPEMSF 101.43120.4399 W 00118 UGS/W 88.28 REPAIR 6 MTC - B21LOINC4 101.43127.4010 042 00119 RIGS/L19 50.29 REPAIR 6 MTC - WILOINCS 609.49154.4010 042 00120 929.36 *VENOoa TOTAL GARTMER'6 OFFICE PRODUCT COPY PATER 121.16 O/31CA11MC 9 COW GIIPPL 101,41301.2020 31594,31"0 042 00091 GLLME/RAY LOT J. GR 41 LOT 5" 650.00 MDF 6TM - EKCAVATION 01.49010.3115 042 002% GOYEAW&NI TRAINING CENT Itl/MOM Gas REG 160.00 COW EALKE 6 SCHOOLS 101.41301.3320 042 00159 GAO;SLEIN BEVERAGE INC. 10.472.45 BEER 608.11150.2520 128968/129334 042 00056 75.90 NIGC TAXABLE 009.119750.2560 178968/179336 282 00057 10,5AD.n *VENDOR TOTAL IDR LMCIICLRING. INC. WTP 771,761.00 PROF GW - ENCIMEERINC F 438,492111.3030 282 00708 GRIDOR/OIG COYER 14,990.91 RIDP CRY - ENGINEERING F 41111.69701.3030 042 00710 WIP 05,655.29 PTO' OW - ENCREERIMG F 436.49201.3030 062 00211 WIP 5.451.17 MERP WN - ENCIIEEOING F 438.49201.3030 042 00717 W1P 14.073.59 EgOF 6RV - ENCIRNLRING F 436.69201.9030 282 OW13 39/,89!,11 *YEAbON TOIAI IO,GLEO CJOXUP GOWIPT PLAN/NATL OUNm 60.00 MISC 1gOFE051C1NAL EERVIC 101.41010.3190 062 OOfO1 FUNERAL NOW. 00.00 NIGC P90FEDSIONAL CERNIC 101.41910.1190 042 OW03 TIRE FINANCIAL SYSTEM CI TT OF PUNT CEI I0 C23/91 09155155 Schsdils of BMs CLSuOR-VM.30 VICE 4 DDR NAPE DESCRIFI ION AMOUNT ACCOLMI MAR FUD 1 ACCOIUO CLAIM INVOICE POB F/P ID LINE IOISIMCTOM KOECLER CAMP MAIL GUARD CTR 40.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.46301.3199 042 0004 REVITAL PLAN 3,871.70 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.46301.5199 042 00016 MAIL GUARD CTR 1,079.25 RISC PRDFESSIOMIIL SERMIC 213.46301.3199 OU 00017 NATL CUARD CTR 1.019.25 MISC P90FESSIOKAL SERNIC 101.41910.31" d2 00018 6.196.20 -n w" TOTAL HOLIDAY CREDIT OGFICF CAS FOR TANKER 61 13.11 MOTOR FUELS 101.4mi.2120 042 0024 HOST/CARP C MOST FINE SCHOOL M.05 TRAVEL E7CPEIISE 101.42201.3310 O►2 0201 C HOST FIRE SCHOOL 60.00 SALARIES. RILL TIRE - RE 101.42201. 1010 062 00202 340.05 -WHOOP TOIAL INDUSTRIAL MAIMT. SUPPLI PARTS 209.28 MISC OPERAIIIIC SI/PLIES 101.43127.21" 7291 042 OD088 JORLSOM/PI IKE M JON" FIRE SCHDDL 280.30 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.42201.3310 d2 00199 , M JOHNSON FIRE SCHOOL 60.00 SALARIES, FILL TIRE - RE 101.42201.1010 042 00200 3W.30 AVLNDOI TOTAL K PART STORE Fa11P-COMSTR INSP 38.32 WALL TOOL66 EOUIPTEIO 101.43115.2410 042 00005 CLEANING SUPPLIES 36.18 MI Sc REPVI OR 6 MTC SUP L1 101.42201.2299 042 00006 COFFFE SUPPLIES 12.39 RISC OR'P7A1I01C SUPPLIES 101.43115.21" 042 MOBS OWN -VENDOR TOTAL KER ANDERSON TRUCKING 122.40 MICC PROFELS1014% GEIMIC 101.42701.31" 042 00071 KEN'S 66 SLRVICL BLDG VAR 119.45 HEMIR 6. MT - VEHICLES 101.4MI.4050 6574 042 OIEEH KLNMEOV 9 CRAVEN HEA M1 CS X9.00 MOODY OIV - LEGAL FEES 213.46301.3040 042 0182 TIF 1-21 42.64 RAP SRV • LEGAL FEES 213.46521.3060 D42 (1011111 11F 1.22 101.20 PROF GW LEGAL FEES 113.4 5".6CM0 042 0164 TIP 1 11 1,111.10 RAF SRV - LEGAL FEES 213.66511.9060 042 DIA 1,103.96 -www T014 LAWS0I'8 ACE MMROYMF 38.61 RISC OKFAIIMC OPRIEO 601.40460.2199 042 M2 1.23 WILDING [MIR GUPPLICS 601.49660.2230 042 006) 41.01 BICC OPEISTING GPPLIED 601.49490.2199 047 000111 1.32 UTILITY 016TE91 MTCE OI+P 601.696q.2270 0420065 18.01614011001.6III CCUI Win 101.41940.2410 00`200044 20.21 RISC OPEM11190 CIIPLIES 101.41960.21" 0420061 69.13 HICC OFFPYTING GIRT ILS 101.63120.1110 042 Dom 19.16 OWL TOOLS & Fal l RE011 101.43121.2610 0420050 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO Jy./23/97 09155155 SchM11. of Bills CLS4OR-VM.30 PUCE 5 t( E1100R MAZE OESCRIPIIOH AOIM ACCOUNT MME FLNO 6 ACCOUR CLAIM INVOICE PON F/P 10 LINE LARSON'S ACE HARDWARE 2.83 VEHICLEIE PAIR PARTS 101.43120.2211 042 00070 5.10 MISC OPEMTINC SUPPLIES 101.45701.2199 042 00011 4.24 CLEANINC SIIFPLI11 211.15501.7 110 042 00077 5.30EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 602.49490.2210 042 00073 103.80 *VENDOR TOTAL LIEFERT TRIICKIMC (QUAL MIME) 15.20 FREICIO 609.49750.3330 042 00056 (OWL NINE) 75.97 FREIONT 609.49750.3330 10798.67590 042 00102 101.17 *VENDOR TOTAL LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC PARTS 225.87 EQUIPMENT REPAIR MUMS 101.43125.2210 17491.17514 042 00181 MMS FOODS MOA MTC 11.99 MI SC DTHIFR ENPEMSE 213.46301.4399 041 00044 COFFEE -PV 11.76 MISC OTMER EXPENSE 101.43110.4399 042 00045 CH POP/CANDY 59.40 MISC OTTER FKPEMSE 101.41960.43" 042 00046 CH MTCS 19.94 MI SC OTMER EXPENSE 101.41301. 1,31111 042 00047 33.16 MISC OPERATINGSLPPLIES 101.12701.2199 042 00048 32.41 CLEANING SIIPPL IES 211.45501.2110 047 00049 235.66 hWWDOI TOTAL HCOOIALL COMPANY FURKACF KIC 171. So REPAIR 6 MIC - MCRA 1 IQ 101.41940.40" 160905 061 00109 MINNECAS,CO NOWAY LIQ -CAS 70.49 W 609.49754.1050 047 DOW MN DEPT OF NATURAL RE90U FD-CLOTHINC 1.607.01 CLOTHINC GfVLIIS 101.42201.2111 042 OD192 MM " EMPLOYLABOR REI. 14W 19MBERSAIP 1991 150.00 43[5. RNKR5MI► 6 SI10SC 101.41301.4330 042 00021 MN SAFEIV COUNCIL J SIPMA DUES 150.00 u9s. MEMBERSHIP 6 C= 101.49110.4330 042 00035 IONTICELLO PRINTIMC 100TH AMIIV 66.46 PRINIto FOMES 1 PARR t01.61901.2O30 042 00036 WNIICCLLO VACIAM CENTER VACUM CLI AMER PART0 39.20 CLEANING GAq IE0 211.49501.2110 16"1 061 aws;t MNNIICIL1.0-6143 LAKE HOSP L nAHEHQIMR/TANC 170.00 EOiERNCI 1 VCOOLS 101,42201,9370 x200193 �.11 DICBTR10U11NG CO. PARIS 11.93 VEMICLE IEPAIR PARTO 101.45201.2211 OY7 000411 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 161.60 P116C 11Al1AKE IAD.49D750.7560 JY•/23/97 09155155 ScMdul. of Bill. FREIGHT VEIIDOR NYE SM92."%66 174.00 DESCRIPTION AYWl7 ACCOUNT NAME FUN 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE MTIGML WSHIMG RUTS L "MAJOR RENTAL 177.69 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PANS 101.43120.2210 602.41490.6381 17141 66.61 VEHICLE REPAIR PARIS 101.43120.2211 7.82 LUBRICANTS IL ADDITIVES 101.43127.2130 88.91 4R/, IE1011 41P III " 0 101.61910.6130 8.73 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199 83.21 EQIIPIENT REPAIR PARTS 602.49490.7210 ANTI F1firt 12.070 472.31 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 602.49490.2211 DItLEU FUEL 816.37 *VENDOR TOTAL 101,61120,7120 MINTY FOUR SERVICES 70LR NATL CMRO FAC IL 146.73 TRAVEL EKPENSE 101.41940.3310 OLSON 6 SONS ELECTRIC, I LIOR REPAIRS 199.05 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 711.45501.7730 17208 CN -SUP PUP 39.94 BALDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 101.419490.7230 164 178.99 AVENIM TOTAL ORR-SOHFLEW-MAYEAM 16 AS EASTIO D KNON.I 943.14CR PROF SM - ENGINEERING F 438.49701.3030 EAST10000 KNOLL 109.50 PROF SM - ENCINEERINC F 438.49201.3030 SV ARA 14.88 NOF SRV - ENGINEERING F 440.49201.9030 M.O. OUTLET 1,105.65 NOF SM - ENGINEERING P 439.69201.9030 .M. ATM ),0499. B1 NOF SM ENGINEERING F 437.49201.3030 SCHOOL BLVD 1,900.61 PROF SM - ENGINEERING F 442.49201.3130 PATHWAY W8.24 PROF GM - ENCIIEERIMC F 495.49211.3090 KEE IN FARtS 65.00 PROF SM - ENCINEERIMC F 641.49201.9030 6,9649.55 MNODR TOTAL OSI ENVINIPENTALL 8D.00 MISC FIRNESSIONRL URVIC 101.4)121.1199 PAU5I IS 6 SONS 355.40 VINE 600.49750.2530 FOTO I WTP ROT05 129.50 0160 OPERATING SUPPLIES 607.61480.7,9f PINNACLE DIOTRIEl1HING CITY OF MONTICELLO CL540R-Vo4.30 PACE 6 P08 F/P 10 LINE 042 00007 042 00008 041 00009 042 00010 062 00011 042 00012 042 00034 042 00179 042 00180 0492 00144 042 00145 0492 00146 042 00141 042 U1148 042 00149 042 00130 042 0013, 062 002M 062 00053 062 Oo0B6 062 00030 0492 00100 062 00012 062 00081 062 00041 062 00062 161.60 P116C 11Al1AKE IAD.49D750.7560 163597.1496496 1.00 FREIGHT GOD.69150.3330 SM92."%66 174.00 6VOOO1 TOTAL PLUHEEIN-PURCELL'S PL 8r "MAJOR RENTAL 236.81 RENTAL MERF-F t)(FIEWE5 602.41490.6381 17141 9U l NLAN R18L I GH 1 NC COMM 1041116 PULLET IN 11.11 88.91 4R/, IE1011 41P III " 0 101.61910.6130 11175350711 (..0'D MAIL ANTI F1firt 12.070 LIMHC.ANTS • AODIT1VT5 101.43120.3190 DItLEU FUEL 170.00 MOTOR FUELS 101,61120,7120 042 00034 042 00179 042 00180 0492 00144 042 00145 0492 00146 042 00141 042 U1148 042 00149 042 00130 042 0013, 062 002M 062 00053 062 Oo0B6 062 00030 0492 00100 062 00012 062 00081 062 00041 062 00062 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO .ri/73/97 09:55:55 Sctrdul. of BI11F CLSkMrVDe.30 PACE 7 7r VENDOR MME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAE FUND 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PON F/P ID LINT RED'S MOBIL 207.00 *VENDOR TOT1LL RIVERPUUCE PHYSICIANS T[STINC-PW 25.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.43120.31" 042 00189 ROYAL PRINTING 6 OFFICE CM 397.!4 MISC OFFICE SUIN'LIES 101.41301.7099 7311,23" �� 042 00165 CDPY PAPER 133.36 DUPLICATING 6 COW SLPPL 101.41301.2070 2322 042 00110 MWD - CA RIO I� 9.115 MISC OFERAI INC %PPL IFS 101.42401.21" 2330 042 00169 PW/FILE CAB Yll.6% FUIF611 TU7E 6 FIMTU ES 101.43110.5601 2394 042 00168 FM/INSP 128.66 MISCOFFICE SUPPLIES 101.13175.7099 2407 042 00167 11V 21.62 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41990.2099 2438 042 00166 928.51 *VENDOR TOTAL S0W®ER 6 SOME, INC. 74ACTOR PARTS 14.16 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS t01.45201.2211 157354 042 (0092 SIIPSON/IVIRC M6111PSON FIRE SC DOIL 226.38 TRAVEL r'04m f 101.472011.!310 067 00203 M I MPSON FIRE SCHOOL 60.00 SALARIES, FULL TIME - RE 101.62201. 1 010 047 00204 "0.59 *VENDOR TOTAL S%TAU/CLIFF REF OVER ON 6.P,91-3260 46.00 911LDINC PCRi1I76 101.37711 04) 00022 STAR TR I SUFE 00(N0(EIPLR AD 600.00 GENERAL PUBLIC INiMAUTI 101.431tO.3520 016500/00 047 D0091 SUIPERI011FCR LANDFILL, 1 LAMP FILL 9/76-!/]1 6,713.96 MISC PQME55IONAL SEINIC 101.437!0.31" 047 OOOi1 SUPLRIOR 6EWICES-CCIRM FFB TEf.YCIE S. 664. lO PFO ISM - RE "CLAW, COM 101.4!730.!101 00 00153 "RCN RECYCLE 11,100.10 NOF LIN - RECYCLIIO Cpl 101.47730.!101 0, 00154 MARCH CAM 10,262.66 Fg01 fAV - FaCOLLEC 101.4!)10.3/OD b7 00155 SOLID WASTE FILES 97.96 POW M - Qf FUSE COI.LEC 101.63230.3, on 047 Do I" SALES IAA 6{1.06 SAL15 TAA 101.411730.31720 OA? 00157 16.406.66 6VENODA TOTAL LWIFT Cl1KTNUCI IOM AFF C.o./o1-2006 150.00 Ic0ROW7 - C01D OCCPAKY 101.770/9 047 001" { TAYLOR LAND GUNVEYOR3 IN /o.00 Mlu oNIUTILc cuanlEe 602.494w.71" 07 00190 +1JJ TL- CaRP , 101 70 CCM66R LLN3 CAPD 162.21 "IGC OPRATIND VJPPLIE0 tOl.63730.71" M" 0.4 Douai BAC FINANC t AL SYSTEM CITY OF MWICELIO �Ctwh3/97 09155155 S h.M. of Bill. GL OR-VM.30 PAGE B UDO1 MATE OESCPIP:IOM AMOUNT ACCOII(1 MAM FIND 1 ACCOI/R CLAIM INVOICL POB F/P IO L 114 TIE WATSON CO., INC. 183.64 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.7540 484124 042 OCI(07 TRANAN-WLTERS, INC. Y;tACTOR PARTS 21.94 EOUIPENI IEPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2710 92760 D47 CPDD% us FV 3170 98.48 TELEPOIE 101.43110.3210 047 UW75 CM 2711, 4404 •1.17 TELEPHONE 101.41301.3210 042 00076 111114L CTRL 11" 2.17 TELEPIIOE 101.42701.3210 047 00071 FO 4111 1.57 TELEPIIOME 101.42201.3710 042 [x7076 M 2712 1.25 "LIEFmNZ 101.41990.3210 047 OWN BLOC 3060 51.08 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 042 00030 147.67 -VENDOR TOTAL VIKING COCA COLA POP/F11 107.78 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.43110.4399 2025265 042 00103 POP FOR RESALE 403.31 MISC TAXABLE 809.49750.2540 2078115» 0%2 001a 273.95 MISC TAXABLE 609.49150.2540 2030516,203734 047 00161 T1S.10 AVENDOP TOTAL �-ST gJBLISMIMG COPIIMY R SESSION 97 LAV CIC 158.69 DLES, 1EMBLRSHIP 8 SUBS[ 101.0301.43313 1110-006-814 W 00152 WIGHT COUNTY ALOITOI-TP Bu1O RPIWP 50.00 MISC OMP EXPENSE 436.49201.4399 04) 00701 WIGHT COUNTY JNRMAL PR AMUAL LIIBSCRIP 25.00 DUf S, MEMBLRSHIP S SLOSC 101.41101.4330 047 00010 WIGHT COL/SrIrTY RECORDER UFLL f/REC tASEMLN7 24.15 PI70F SIM - LEGAL FEES 101.41910.3040 042 0014 WIGHT C"TV SJIMFYOI 3 HALF STC1 ION MAPS 24.00 NISC OPERATING GPI1115 101.43110.2199 042 00001 WIOIT-441.NEPIN COOP LLE 7115 V AIVFR-PAAK 13.98 IMINIIMAINI ACEEt19NT6 101,45 (1 201.3112 M C1W7/ 119 E 3X0.12 19.12 MINTLKWE ACALEEEMTS 101.41980.9190 017 0008 8/ Y 6TH -FO 90.51 MAINTEMANCI AC [MILI176 101.47701.3190 OU DOOM CR39/CILI.A4D BCC LIGHT 9.00 ELECTRIC 101.49180.3810 047 00705 142.61 AYUOOR TOTAL WA 8 AS:OCIATF.S, INC. 145 RAM BVIfV 1,101.00 PO GRW - tWlWfRINC F 101,41110.3030 047 0001 CV 45TH 158.00 POI GIM - (NCIKERIFO F 101.46110.9030 042 00127 IIIILRAI.IRK 613.00 FTOF GRIT . ING11E1RIMC F 101.43110.9030 00 001)3 1 AMDLR: SAN BEY 7,435.00 PROF GIM - (MGINLERINO f 101.49110.3030 042 00126 UP1N TIIU PGOA 118.00 OF SMINGII[FR:= F 101.41110.3030 062 OOIN MUIR CNICYI 499.00 Im GIV • INGIIB,ERMOF 101.49110.303D a7 00131 4T IBCIAIIP 1.167,00 NOF CAV - INGINtRIMC F 101.43110.3090 00 0091 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO f/23/97 09:55:55 Soh d s, of B111P CL54011-VO4.30 PACE 9 vtNOOR NI11E OESCRIMION AFDLINT ACCOI7R NAME FLND ► ACCOUNT CLAIM IN40ICE PIU/ F/P 10 LINE NSB 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. MISS SIDES BRIDGE 64.00 ROOF SIN - ENGINEERING F 101.63110.3030 062 00128 STN SEM TRBUNt FEE 528.00 PROF SRV - ENCOIEERINC F 101.63110.3030 042 00179 MI SC 8,751.50 PROF SRV - ENCI WE111111 F 101.43110.3010 042 00130 IIS EAN 8,581.00 PROOF SVC-ENC INEERINC REI 101.63110.3035 042 00131 F49JR C141RCH 176.00 PROF SK-ENCINEERINC REI 101.43110.3035 067 00132 PRAIRIE VEST 2ND 264.00 PROOF SK-ENCIIIEERINC REI 101.43110.3035 062 00133 RUI RIE HEST IE PLAT 436.00 PROF SK-ENCINF E RING REI 101. 43110. 3035 062 00134 KJELL EAST SEN !08.00 PROF M-ENG I NEER I NC REI 101.43110.3035 042 00135 NLE IN FARM-ORAINW ),539.00 PROF SK-ENCIIEEPINC REI 101.43110.9035 042 00136 KIEIN FARMS ORD 600.00 PROF SVC-ENC 1111111 NC IEt 101 .4!110.3075 042 00117 CARDINAL P01D 1,750.00 PROF SVC.ENCtWfRING RE 101.43110.3035 042 00138 CASiSP000 KNOLL 88.00 PROOF SRV - F11C 11EERINC F 10t.42W1.3070 062 00139 KIE IN FARMS ASKT ROLL 1,110.00 PROF SQV - ENCIKERING F 641.4.9201.3030 042 00140 0.NDA5 RD ASNT ROLL 42.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 466.49201.30311 042 00161 SC"DOL BLVD ASMI ROLL 425.00 PROF SRV - ENC 109FRING F 642.49201.3030 042 0014) CILLARD AV/71.0. OUTLET 620.50 PROF SIN - ENGINEERING F 639.49201.3030 042 00143 DONDMA VAT1N 467.50CR RIOT SRV - ENCINEERING F 101.43110.3030 CA2 00714 KLEIN FARMS 3RD 1.663.25 PROOF SVC-EN035 GINEERING REI 101.4!110.3 042 00215 CH67M 109.75 PRO SK-ENG#WFRINC RE 101.63110. SOUS 047 00716 KJELL E 1,068.50 ROOF SVC-ENC INEERINC REI 101.43110.!075 042 00217 RS EAW 855.50 PFOOF SK-ENCINEERING REI 101.43110.3015 042 OD218 ANOERS/w 575.50 PROOF SVC-M:NEE91N1 REI 101.4!110.3035 042 00219 CI OR CHUPICH 64.00 PROF SK-ENCLEERING REI 101.67110.3035 LN12 00270 CARO POND 64.00 PROF 5K-ENGINEERING REO 101.631 tO. W35 042 00221 1415C 1,611.00 PF SRV F - ENCINEFRING 101.43110.9030 ROO 042 00272 IIS PLAN REVIEW 1!7.00 PROF SRV - EPICOEEPING F 101.A3110.W3D 047 00721 IS EA APP 1,828.00 PROF SRV - ENC IWFRINC F 101.43110.7030 M2 00274 RCCURR CHURCH 4.2.50 RS- ENCINFERINC IF 101.43110.3030 OOFRV 042 00775 I LINE RAIMM 176.00 PROOF GPV - ENGINEERING F 101.47110.7030 042 00226 RWM TOOL 4.7.50 PROF GROW - ENNGINEFRING F 101.43110.3030 067 00221 ST N[NRY'S 891.50 P470F GRN - CNC INLERING F 101.67110.9070 047 W228 TAPPCR LKP A2.50 PROOF SAV - ENGINEERING F 217.46!09.7010 O4) 00779 LAKE TOOL 65.00 PW CRIO - ENCHNEFRING F 213."5)1.3030 M) 00730 MORTON BLOC 42.50 PROF SM - ENGINEERING F 101.42401.X130 04.7 00231 OONDIUI FNP 325.25 ROOF CEN . ENCNF[RING F 101.62401.7070 067 00232 SPINA OAKES 11 2,986.50 PROF GIN - ENGINEERING F 57.4,9201.7070 0"7 00733 45,686.75 M.NDOR IOTAI IIEGLER. INC. EDGE 146.76 NICE OtIAT1NC Et LIED 101.4.1125.21" PCODDDID935 047 0OD99 RTFR KIT 40.20 EOUIq(111 REPAIR PARTE 101.47171.7710 PCODOO10976 042 00096 186.46 OWNDOR TOTAL BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/77/97 09155155 �tMoaa Nw+E EKSCR I PT ION R[POITT TOTALS. Sch.61. of Bill e NOW IICCONIT NNE FUO L ACCOW 527,452.M RECORDS PRINTED - 000733 CERIN INVOICE CITY OF MONTICECLO u0hop—v4.30 PW TD POW F/P ID UNIT DRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ,Q4/73/97 09,57.28 Sd.6,10 of Bill. FUND RECAPt FUD DESCRIPTION DIS811RSFMNTS 101CEHERAL FUND 80,152.53 211 L I BRARY FtIIO 262.90 213 HU FUO 8,366.36 240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FO 29.66 355 1"2 FIRE HALL REFUDINC SO 266.00 379 TIP 1961 (/MUCO) WO FUD 260.00 435 93-M PATHWAY PAMCT 658.24 436 93-140 WWIP I,XPAAIS 1011 PFJ 997,946.11 437 94 -OIC CARDINAL HILIS IV CP 9,049.61 436 90-02C EASTWOOO KNOLL637.64 CR 439 93-120 N.O. TRW STN SE1RR 1,526.15 410 95 -OIC SOUTHIKST AICA 14.80 041 99-070 KEE IN FARMS 1,175.00 44295-030 OCELLO/SCHOOL 6 LVD 33 3,3.61 46 4" CO 9"IC DAS RD/CONI CTR 3D 47.50 M/ 96-02C BRIAR OAK'ES 2ND 2.986.50 601 WATER FUD 291.42 602 SEVER FUO 1,171.63 �119 F6/NICIPAL LIQUOR FUD RIVERSIDE CEMETERY 26.1".96 650.00 107AL ALL FLOW 527,452." MIK RECAPI MHK MAK I URIPSIENE0176 CFWI GENERAL CHECKING 501,907.06 LIOR LIQUOR CHECKING 26.1".56 10TAL ALL BANKS 527.452." THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE W43 REVIEWS AND MWOCIV[D FOR PAVIFNT. DATE ............ APPROVED BY ................................. CITY OF MONTICELLO G060S-VO4.30 RCCAPPAGE CL5A(R Ri 250 Fast Broadway P. O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362.9245 MEMO Phone (612) 295-2711 Metro: (612) 333.5739 Fax: (612) 2954104 TO: City Staff A FROM: Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator DATE: April 21, 1997 UU RE: Project prioritization and workload inventory process update As you recall, at the staff' prioritization meeting last Wednesday, it was determined that the Council meeting on the 23rd would be cancelled pending completion of all project resource allocation worksheets for both mandatory and optional (initiatives) projects and workload inventory fors. After further discussion with the Mayor, it has been determined that the Council meeting scheduled for 4:30 on the 23rd would go on; however, the discussion by Council will probably be limited to clarification and discussion of priorities only as identified on the colored prioritization summary that was sent to Council and staff on Friday, See Karen if you did not get the Council prioritization summary. It is hoped that the Council meeting on the 23rd will generate a limited list of projects that staff should focus on completing in 1997/98. Once this list is generated, then staff leaders will have the opportunity to complete a resource allocation form for Council -selected initiatives, which we can discuss at an upcoming meeting. In the meantime, the staff meeting scheduled for Wednesday at 1:30 will go on, too. At this meeting, we can review the project resource allocation forms completed for mandatory projects by project leaders. We can also review the general workload summary sheets. This meeting will give us a handle on how much time we have left over for now initiatives. Thank you all for your efforts toward this important process of setting objectives. See you on Wednesday. OAS NPubUe Worb, 9090oVCbum Rd, Nand ella, MN SM92 • Phom: (619)996.3/711 • Far: (619)995.3170, rn. 1