Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 10-27-1997
MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, October 13,1997 - 7 p.m. Members Present: Bill Fair, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen Members Absent: None A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 22 AND THE SPECIAL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 29, 1997, AS WRITTEN. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Consideration of ad ing items to the agenda. None. 4. Citizens commenWpetitions. requests- and complaint_o. None. 5. Consent agenda. A. Consideration of Chancp Order No. 7 for City Project No. 93-14C. NFxxnansion of the Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility. Recommendation: Approve Change Order No. 7 as proposed for a total of $39,982. 13. Consideration of n conditional use wrmit to allow 1) the estahlishmenl of an nuto body repairashon and accessory outdoor staragre area within it 3-9 (highway bugin set zoning district_ and 2) a planned unit dsv lo_pm nt. conditional ngepermit (IUD/CUP) to allow shared use of an outdoor storage area lwi h adjacent auto body shop)- Applicant. ,lo n to nson. Recommendation: Approve the conditional use permit to allow an auto body repair shop and accessory outdoor storage area within it B-3 zone and approve a planned unit development conditional use permit to allow shared use of an outdoor storage area with adjacent auto body shop per the site plan shown as Exhibit C in the I'lanner's report, with the following conditions: Page 1 0 Council Minutes - 10/13/97 1. The submitted site plan is modified to comply with applicable off-street parking requirements (11 spaces required). 2. Consideration is given to consolidating the parking lots of the subject site and adjacent northerly site in a manner similar to that illustrated in Exhibit C of the Planner's report. 3. The City Attorney provide comment and recommendation in regard to issues associated with possible future sale of the subject site or adjacent northerly property. 4. The outdoor storage area is reduced in size to not more than 50% of the area of the principal building. 5. The outdoor vehicle storage area is minimally screened by a 6 -ft high, 100% opaque fence which is designed to blend with the auto body shop and which is constructed of materials treated to resist discoloration. 6. The outdoor vehicle storage area is surfaced in asphalt or concrete. 7. Exterior finish materials of the body shop comply with applicable ordinance requirements. 8. All exterior lighting is hooded and directed such that the light source is not visible from public rights-of-way or neighboring residences. 9. All site signage complies with applicable provisions of the ordinance. 10. The site plan is modified to illustrate an off --street loading space. 11. Damaged screening fences must be reinstated along the Marvin Road side of the auto body shop. The recommendation is based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the spirit and intent of the comprehensive plan goals and policies and in keeping with the intent of the zoning ordinance, will not have any adverse impacts as outlined in the conditional use permit section of the zoning ordinance, and shall not impose any undue burden upon public facilities and services. Page 2 Council Minutes - 10/13/97 C. Consideration of: 1) a conditional use perrait to allow peen/outdoor s orae . sales nd service, and automobile (recreational vehicle) pa r within a B-3 zoning istrict: Rnd 2) ay riancr from the minimum 5 - setback imposed upon parking rep and associated with commercial np s. Applicant. Bruce Medlork and Mirhael Gainnte on behalf of Monticello RV Center, Inc. Recommendation: Approve the conditional use permit to allow open/outdoor storage, sales and service, and minor automobile (recreational vehicle) repair within a B-3 zone with the following conditions: 1. All outdoor storage and sales areas are screened from view of abutting residential zoning districts and public rights-of-way in accordance with applicable City screening requirements, including a 20 -ft landscape yard along the site's northern boundary. 2. A landscape plan is submitted which identifies the location, type, and size of all site plantings. 3. The crushed rock surfacing of the outdoor sales area is contained by curbing, edging, or an elevational change (lower) F from the bordering off-street parking areas as deemed appropriate by the City Building Official. 4. All exterior lighting is hooded and directed such that the light source is not visible from public rights-of-way or neighboring residences. 5. The site plan is revised to illustrate individual parking stalls (including those devoted to the handicapped). 6. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise associated with the proposed recreational vehicle repair activities. 7. The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation regarding drainage issues. 8. The site's principal building complies with applicable height and building material requirements. 9. All site signage complies with applicable provisions of the ordinance. Page 3 (9 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, October 27, 1997 - 7 p.m. Mayor: Bill Fair Council Members: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held October 13 and the special meeting held October 14, 1997. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. 4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. 5. Consent agenda. A. Consideration of renewing contract for police protection services with Wright County Sheriffs Department. B. Consideration of a resolution accepting petition and authorizing feasibility study for extending utilities and 7th Street improvements. Applicant, St. Henry's Church. C. Consideration of rejecting bids for the 1997 pathway and pathway bridge construction, Project Nos. 97.08C and 96-05P. D. Consideration of Change Order No. 2 for Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition, Project 96-02C. E. Consideration of a resolution declaring cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of a proposed assessment for high school trunk storm sewer, Project 97.07C. 6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion. 7. Public Hearing --Consideration of adopting proposed assessment roll for delinquent utility bills and certification of assessment roll to County Auditor. 8. Consideration of a resolution awarding the sale of $1,576,000 C.O. improvement bonds, Series 1997A - IQein Farms 4th Addition; and approving contract for continuing disclosure with Springsted, Inc. Agenda Monticello City Council October 27, 1997 Page 2 9. Consideration of authorizing preparation of Water Resource Management Plan for the City of Monticello. 10. Consideration of change in policy for sewer and water worker emergency response time. 11. Consideration of replacement of two Norwegian snow plows. 12. Consideration of purchase of snow plow for 4 -wheel drive Case loader. 13. Consideration of bills for the last half of October, 1997. 14. Adjournment. Council Minutes - 10/13/97 10. The site plan is modified to illustrate an off-street loading space. 11. The Building Official is authorized to enforce staged compliance with conditional use permit conditions. The recommendation is based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the spirit and intent of the comprehensive goals and policies and in keeping with the intent of the zoning ordinance, will not have any adverse impacts as outlined in the conditional use section of the zoning ordinance, and shall not impose any undue burden upon public facilities and services. The variance request was denied by the Planning Commission and no appeal was filed; therefore, no Council action was required. D. Consideration of. 11 a zoane ordinance man a.nendment changing the district d sipnation from AO Agricultural Ogen Space- to B-3. (highway buainess)_ 21 a planned unit development con ition l use pg it to allow outdoor s 1 s- outdoor s oraeg, and automotive body �p .r.n a B-3 zoninu district- and 31 a variance from the City's off - g r p r ine cnrhing reQ uir m n s ApnLcnt. Could Brothers Chevrolet. This item was removed from the consent agenda for discussion. E. Cnnsideration of an application for rezoning from 1.2 to planned unit devejppm nt district to allow nixed uses on it comhenation of p ra eel^- v ri n r from LhP setback requirements for a loading dock. PUD per it to allow _construction of a loading dock, and phasing of other rem+.red imorovem n s to + nonconforming building, Applicant Io Mirns/Little Mountain Food. Recommendation: Approve rezoning the Little Mountain Feed site from 1-2 to planned unit development based on the finding that the PUD zoning district will allow the City to best manage the impacts of the proposed use in conformance with the comprehensive plan, the proposed uses are appropriate in the City's efforts to redevelop its downtown area as identified in the MCP Plan, and the proposed zoning will not have adverse impacts on the neighboring land uses. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 297. Approve the issuance of a PUD permit to Little Mountain Feed to allow the expansion of the loading dock without concurrent site improvements based on the finding that expansion of the business is appropriate given the proximity to Sunny Fresh Foods, and the addition of the loading dock is an insignificant expansion and should not key the need to provide other site improvements at this time. Page 4 0 Council Minutes - 10/13/97 The variance request was approved by the Planning Commission, and no appeal was filed; therefore, no Council action was required. Consideration of text and man amen m n s renaming SC (sings c_mF:s) zoning district to I- 1A dight industrial district A); and consideration of text amendments to the 6 sin ss campus district rrem•lationg b_ eliminating theBreen spac�rgq rement outside of th_e standard sthack guirements. Applicant. Monticello P anning Commission. Recommendation: Approve an ordinance amendment renaming the BC (business campus) district to I -IA and eliminating the percentage landscape area from the BC/I-IA district. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 298. Congideration of p :rc aline RV Center prop re tv. Recommendation: Accept the terms of the purchase agreement to purchase the RV Center property from Ralph and Naomi Hermes for $85,423.18. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS RECOMMENDED, WITH ITEM 5D REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION. Motion carried unanimously. • .. • .W4 _ . s • • • • • u • • • .: • : . 1 I M • 1 • • .. . : . • : 1 . •. I • City Planner Steve Grittman reported that the applicant requested a change to the parking lot layout as proposed in the Planner's report by eliminating the parking island. The applicant proposed instead to establish striping for parking around the rear of the building. Assistant Administrator O'Neill noted that the site plan could be amended to eliminate the proposed parking island provided that the site plan shows the minimum number of parking spaces required. Page 6 0 Council Minutes - 10/13/97 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE REZONING THE GOULD BROTHERS CHEVROLET PROPERTY FROM AO TO B-3, TO APPROVE THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW SALES, OUTDOOR STORAGE, AND AUTOMOTIVE BODY REPAIR IN A B-3 ZONE, AND TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN REGARDING PARKING LAYOUT. MOTION IS CONTINGENT ON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE OUTDOOR VEHICLE ST'C'.%AGE AREA SHALL NOT EXCEED 50% OF THE AREA OF THE AUTOMOBILE SHOP. 2. THE OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA IS SCREENED VIA A 6 -FT HIGH, 100' OPAQUE FENCE DESIGNED TO BLEND WITH THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING AND TREATED TO RESIST DISCOLORATION. 3. THE OUTDOOR VEHICLE STORAGE AREA IS SURFACED IN ASPHALT OR CONCRETE PAVING. 4. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT INFORMATION NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIRED OF THE USE. 5. THE SITE PLAN IS REVISED TO ILLUSTRATE INDIVIDUAL OFF- STREET PARKING STALLS (IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS) AND VEHICLE DRIVE LANES. 6. OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES INTENDED FOR CUSTOMER PARKING ARE DELINEATED VIA STRIPING AND PERIMETER CURBING. 7. BUILDING ELEVATIONS ARE SUBMITTED WHICH ILLUSTRATE THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE ADDITIONS AND SPECIFY FINISH MATERIALS (IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS). A. THE SITE'S ADVERTISING SIGN (BILLBOARD) IS REMOVED WITHIN FIVE YEARS OF THE DATE OF PUD/CUP APPROVAL. 9. THE SITE PIAN IS REVISED TO IDENTIFY THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE 'RELOCATED" GAS TANK. 10. ALL SITE SIGNAGE COMPLIES WITH A1311LICABLF PROVISIONS OF THE ORDINANCE. 11. THE SITE PLAN IS REVISED TO ILLUSTRATE. AN OFF-STREET LOADING SPACE. Pago 6 (D Council Minutes - 10/13/97 12. THE CITY ENGINEER PROVIDE COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN REGARD TO DRAINAGE ISSUES. 13. CURB TO BE INSTALLED AT SETBACK LOCATIONS WITH PHASE I OF DEVELOPMENT AS NOTED ON EXHIBIT C OF THE PLANNER'S REPORT. Motion is based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the spirit and intent of the comprehensive plan goals and policies and in keeping with the intent of the zoning ordinance, will not have any adverse impacts as outlined in the conditional use permit section of the zoning ordinance, shall provide adequate parking and loading as outlined, and shall not impose any undue burden upon public facilities and services. Motion carried unanimously. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 296. The variance request was denied by the Planning Commission, and no appeal was filed; therefore, no Council action was required. City Planner Steve Grittman reported that the Monticello Country Club requested rezoning of a portion of their property from R-1 to R-2, which would allow a 12 -unit townhouse project along a private drive adjacent to the golf course. The original request proposed a 16 -unit project; however, 4 units were deleted from the plan near the single family homes during Planning Commission review. The site proposed is adjacent to the club house entrance drive and would require relocation of an existing maintenance shed. The neighborhood adjacent to the area includes an 8 -unit townhouse project and a series of single family parcels known as Club View Terrace. One of the concerns noted with the original proposal was the impact on area property values since the existing single family homes and townhomes rely significantly on the view to the northeast of the golf course; however, the City Planner noted that with the modified plan, the homes would continue to have a north/northeast view of the golf course. It was also noted that the proposed townhouse project would be of a higher density than the surrounding neighborhood at about 7.0 units per acre. Page 7 0 Council Minutes - 10/13/97 Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the Planning Commission discussed loss of value, additional traffic, and sight lines during the public hearing. It was their view that with the removal of the four units east and north of the R -I area, the sight lines were essentially preserved. In addition, it was estimated that 12 units would create 120 vehicle trips per day. Given the amount of traffic already in the area from golf course use, it was felt the increase in traffic would not impact the value of the nearby R-1 properties. Therefore, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning request. Mayor Fair noted that letters opposing the rezoning had been received from the following residents: Matt and Dean Stroemer, Harry Walsh, Alan and Susie Wojchouski, Gene and Ann Fair, Floyd Markling, and Alois and Alice Stangler. Councilmember Clint Herbst noted his concern regarding depreciation of the present homes in the neighborhood if the area was rezoned to R-2. In addition, he noted that the comprehensive plan suggests lower density along the river, golf courses, etc., and it was his view that rezoning this area to R-2 would be a contradiction of the comprehensive plan. Public Works Director John Simola noted his concern that the layout would make it difficult for city services such as garbage and recycling pickup to be performed due to the density. Attorney Brad Larson, representing Floyd Markling, requested permission to read a letter to the Council since he was unable to forward his comments to the Council prior to the meeting. His letter noted concerns of density, traffic, driveway relocation, road size, design standards, townhome parking, market values, and setbacks as they would relate to the existing townhomes. Mayor Fair noted that many of the comments being made pertained more to specific site development standards and suggested that the discussion concentrate on the rezoning request at this time. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CUNT BERBST AND SECONDED 13Y BRIAN STUMPF TO DENY THE REZONING REQUEST BASED ON TILE FINDING THATTHE LOCATION OF THE REZONING WOULD TEND TO DEPRECIATE VALUES OF TME NEIGIII30RING PROPERTIES SINCE IT WOULD INTERFERE WITH THE VIEW, WHICH IS AN IMPORTANT COMPONENT OF THOSE VALUES, AND THE RE70NING COULD RESULT IN A DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS MORE. DENSE THAN THAT ENCOURAGED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PIAN. Voting in favor: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf. Opposed: Bruce Thielen, Bill Fair, Roger Carlson. Motion failed. Page 8 (9 Council Minutes - 10/13/97 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO ACCEPT $24,000 FOR PURCHASE OF THE VACANT PARCEL AS IS, INCLUDING THE 12 -FT STRIP OF LAND ADJACENT TO LOCUST STREET, WITH THE BUYER RESPONSIBLE FOR EXPENSES TO TRANSFER THE PROPERTY. Motion carried unanimously. City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller reported that the Monticello Police Commission previously discussed a letter from the previous School Superintendent, Sheldon Johnson, requesting establishment of a four-way stop sign at the intersection of School Boulevard and Fallon Avenue near the Little Mountain Elementary School. At that time, the majority of the Police Commission members also supported the installation of a four-way stop sign. Wolfsteller noted that School Boulevard was planned to be a collector street, continuous from Highway 25 to County Road 118, with stop signs placed on Fallon Avenue at School Boulevard. After reviewing a traffic report in 1996 prepared by the Wright County Sheriffs Department, the Council agreed with the recommendation to post the speed limit on School Boalevard from Fallon Avenue to County Road 118 at 30 mph when children were present but did not recommend installation of a four-way stop sign. The Police Commission recently discussed the intersection due to the increasing residential housing development that's occurring in the area, including the future phases of Klein Farms 3rd and 4th Additions, and again recommended that the City Council consider installing a four-way stop sign at the School Boulevard/Fallon Avenue intersection. It was their view that the stop signs were necessary to enable children to safely cross School Boulevard to reach the elementary and other schools in the area. In a preliminary pedestrian circulation plan for the area, City Planner Steve Grittman also recommended that a stop sign may be needed on School Boulevard to provide safe crossing for pedestrian traffic. However, the City Administrator suggested that the Council consider authorizing a traffic engineer to study the area prior to installing additional stop signs. The Council discussed the amount and speed of traffic in the area, as well as the traffic concerns at the County Road 117/School Boulevard intersection. Enforcement of the posted speed limit and stopping for pedestrians in crosswalks were also discussed, along with the pathway system proposed for the Klein Farms 3rd and 4th Additions. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN TO AUTHORIZE REVIEW OF THE SCHOOL. BOULEVARD/FALLON AVENUE INTERSECTION BY ATRAFFIC ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLING ANY ADDITIONAL. TRAFFIC DEVICES. Motion died for Inck of a second. Page 10 Council Minutes - 10/13/97 A MOTION WAS THEN MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO APPROVE THE REZONING FROM R-1 TO R-2 TO ACCOMMODATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TOWNHOUSE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AS PROPOSED BY THE MONTICELLO COUNTRY CLUB BASED ON THE FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED ZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH LAND USES IN THE AREA, IT WOULD RESULT IN DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS NEEDED IN THE COMMUNITY, AND WOULD NOT LIKELY DEPRECIATE THE AREA IN WHICH IT IS LOCATED. Voting in favor: Bruce Thielen, Bill Fair, Roger Carlson. Opposed: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf. Motion failed, as a 4/5 vote is required for rezoning approval. The property remains R-1 Assistant Administrator Jeff O'Neill reported that the City recently received two proposals for internet web site service, one from the Monti pr Flo Tim s, and the other from Cloud Communications, Inc., operated by Steve Andrews. He suggested that the Council may want to recommend that City staff prepare and distribute an RFP prior to selecting a web site service. Don Smith and Sherri White, representing the Monticello Times, presented a sample city web site and explained what information could he included. Mr. Smith noted that they have been online for approximately 1 �f, years and could easily help the City establish their web site. Steve Andrews of Cloud Communications stated that he has been working with the internet since 1991 and that he could provide web site services more cost effectively. He explained that the $6,000 fee in the proposal would not be an annual fee but for development of the site. Maintenance of the site was estimated at $228 per month. It was the consensus of Council to table discussion of purchasing internet web site services until after the 1998 budget workshop. City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller reported that Mr. Charles Ehlen of Cinco Corporation, owner of the post office facility, submitted an offer of $24,000 for the purchase of the City -owned vacant parcel adjacent to the post office; however, the purchase price was subject to the City removing all of the trees and stumps from the property and bringing in the appropriate fill to establish a grade for construction of a parking lot. In addition, Mr. Ehlen requested that the City -owned 12-R strip of land established for driveway access off of Locust Street also he deeded to Cinco Corporation. Page 9 0 Council Minutes - 10/13/97 City Engineer Bret Weiss recommended that the intersection remain as is with stop signs on Fallon Avenue because School Boulevard was designed to be a through street; however, he did agree that there were traffic problems at the County Road 117/School Boulevard intersection that may need to be addressed in the future. Mayor Fair stated that he felt that the design of School Boulevard encouraged excessive speed, and stop signs would make motorists cognizant of the speed zone and pedestrians in the area. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BILL FAIR AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO INSTRUCT CITY STAFF TO INSTALL A FOUR-WAY STOP SIGN AT THE INTERSECTION OF SCHOOL BOULEVARD AND FALLON AVENUE. Voting in favor: Bill Fair, Brian Stumpf. Opposed: Clint Herbst, Bruce Thielen, Roger Carlson. Motion failed. Councilmember Bruce Thielen stated that any changes made to traffic patterns should be based on solid information, which should include a traffic study now and in the future for comparison. A MOTION WAS THEN MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO AUTHORIZE A TRAFFIC STUDY TO BE COMPLETED BY A TRAFFIC ENGINEER FOR SCHOOL BOULEVARD FROM HIGHWAY 25 TO COUNTY ROAD 118 BY A TRAFFIC ENGINEER. Motion carried unanimously. 11. rpnaid ra ion of snow removal fromselected purtiona of the a hw y_sys gym. Public Works Director John Simola reported that City staff met with the Parks Commission to discuss snow removal from the pathways, and it was concluded that clearing of the pathways for the first year should be limited the pathway along County Road 75 from West River Street near the NSP Training Center to the east side of Pinewood Elementary School, from the east side of the Monticello High School to Meadow Oak Avenue, and along the north side of School Boulevard between County Road 118 and County Road 117. After surveying 12 communities regarding pathway clearing, it was found that all of the cities cleared pathways using their own employees or did not clear pathways at all. None of the cities contracted for pathway clearing; however, proposals were obtained for contracting snow removal from the skating rinks and sections of the pathway based on an estimated number of occurrences. Two bids were received, with the low bid at $21,150. Page 1 1 0 Council Minutes - 10/13/97 Bids were also received for purchase of an MT Trackless and Holder, which were both demonstrated for the public works department in 1996. A new Holder was priced at $73,908.09, and a new MT Trackless at $58,817.83. Used equipment ranged from $28,755 to $66,722.50. A state bid was also obtained on a skid steer loader with a hydraulically driven snow blower for $33,797.78. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO PURCHASE THE STATE BID JOHN DEERE SKID STEER LOADER WITH SNOW BLOWER AND ANGLE PLOW OPTION AT A COST OF $33,797.78 FOR CLEANING THE SKATING RINKS AND PATHWAYS WITH CITY FORCES, AND TO CONTINUE LOOKING FOR A SANDER ATTACHMENT IN THE $3,000 TO $4,500 RANGE. Voting in favor: Clint Herbst, Bruce Thielen, Bill Fair, Roger Carlson. Opposed: Brian Stumpf. Motion carried. 12. Va aid ra .ion of ad 'tio al brush pickup at curbside from July 1 storm. Public Works Director John Simola reported that the City Council recently discussed the possibility of an additional brush pickup prompted by a letter from the owners of the Rand House Bed & Breakfast. Atter reviewing the amount of brush that was hauled by the City and various groups and volunteers, it was recommended that the City charge for additional pickups or allow residents to enter into an agreement with the City for assessing the cost of the brush pickup. In addition, Simola also suggested that the Council consider the possibility of burning the brush in the parking lot near the Rand House if the residents within 600 R of the burn site agree. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO AUTHORIZE BY CONTRACT AN ADDITIONAL BRUSH PICKUP FOR THOSE INDIVIDUALS OWNING LARGE PROPERTIES STILL REQUIRING CLEANUP FROM THE STORM, WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING THE EXPENSE EITHER UP FRONT OR THROUGH AN ASSESSMENT, OR RESIDENTS COULD PAY FOR THE COSTOF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ASH DISPOSAL TO BURN THE BRUSH. Motion tamed unanimously. 13. Cnwiderntion of new water rate structure. Public Works Director John Simola reported that the DNR has requested that the City implement water demand reduction measures, which would include a public education program and an evaluation of the current water rate structure and its impact on conservation. The City currently uses a declining block rate structure where the cost of water is cheaper the more you use, which does not encourage water conservation. It was proposed that the City implement a uniform rate throughout the community as of January 1, 1998. Page 12 Council Minutes - 10/13/97 A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO APPROVE THE UNIFORM RATE STRUCTURE OF $10 FOR THE FIRST 500 CU IT, MINIMUM QUARTERLY BILLING, AND $0.45 PER 100 CU FT THEREAFTER PER QUARTER, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1998. Motion carried unanimously. 14. Consideration of request for funding assistance by Chamber of Co m Monticello Chamber of Commerce President Grace Pederson requested that the Council consider forgiving the 1997 reimbursement payment totaling $1,600 for their office remodeling at the information center She noted that the Chamber anticipated a net income of $1,550 from the 1997 Riverfest celebration; however, because the celebration was delayed due to the July 1 storm, they actually incurred a net loss of $1,214. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO FORGIVE THE REIMBURSEMENT AMOUNT FOR 1997 TOTALING $1,600. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Deruyter requested that his presentation be rescheduled for another meeting. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROGER CA.RL.SON AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO APPROVE THE BILLS FOR T11E FIRST HALF OF OCTOBER AS PRESENTED. Motion carried unanimously. 17. Other mnttcrs. Public Works Director John Simola requested authorization from the Council to place their names on a plaque for the new wastewater treatment plant. It was the consensus of Council to allow their names to be placed on the plaque. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE TIIIELEN AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO ADJOURN TILE MEETING. Motion carried unanimously. Karen Doty Office Manager �I Page 13 `� MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, October 14, 1897 - 5 p.m. Members Present: Bill Fair, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen Members Absent: None A special meeting of the City Council was held for the purpose of reviewing the preliminary 1998 municipal budget. City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller reported that the net certified levy increase in dollars for 1998 was preliminarily established at $957,133, a 30% increase over 1997. Of that amount, $627,785 is to cover debt. Residents would not necessarily see a 30% increase in the city portion of their taxes, however, because new residential and commercial development would add to the city's valuation. Wolfsteller also noted that, due to the current state-wide tax restructuring process, the 1998 tax capacity value was estimated to decrease approximately 10% to $14,465,000 compared to $15,993,989 for 1997. Councilmember Bruce Thielen suggested that the Council consider establishing a specific percentage increase for the 1998 budget and allow each department to prioritize their budget items in order to decrease the budget to the amount established by the Council. A discussion was held regarding the parks department budget of $384,290, during which Mayor Fair noted that some of the items would probably have to be deleted from the 1998 budget. He also suggested that the City focus more on rehabilitating the current community parks, particularly Bridge Park, rather than adding to the park inventory. Assistant Administrator Jeff O'Neill noted that the Parks Commission could review their budget items at their meeting scheduled for October 16. Councilmember 7'hielen suggested that equipment items be separated from park improvements and that the City consider establishing a separate parks department to help accomplish the goals set by the Parks Commission. Council also discussed adding lighting to existing ballfields in lieu of creating new ones and reducing the boulevard tree planting program by half to planting 900 trees in 1998 and 900 in 1999. It was also suggested that shade tree funds could be used in the form of a matching grant program to encourage residents to plant more trees. Page 1 0 Special Council Minutes - 10/14/97 City Administrator Wolfsteller noted that there are some reserve funds that could be used for some of the programs or items deleted from the 1998 budget. Councilmember Herbst suggested that Council consider establishing a 4-5% increase for the 1998 budget and have the City Administrator review which items could be deleted from the budget but paid for by reserve funds. Economic Development Director 011ie Koropchak reported that the HRA has requested an additional $30,000 for a marketing program and $35,000 for purchasing two additional properties in the downtown/riverfront area for a total increase of $65,000 to the HRA budget. A brief discussion was held regarding web site services as proposed at the October 13 Council meeting. Mayor Fair suggested that department heads meet to discuss staff's role in maintaining information for the web site prior to Council consideration. Mayor Fair then requested that the City Council meet without an agenda prior to the second meeting of each month at 5:30 p.m. for Council -generated discussions and sharing liaison information. It was the consensus of Council to establish 5:30 p.m. on the 4th Monday of each month for general Council discussions, beginning in November 1997. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Karen Doty Office Manager Page 2 0 Council Agenda - 10/27/97 A_ REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Wright County Board has submitted a new two-year law enforcement contract for police protection covering the years 1998 and 1999. The basic language in the contract has not been changed other than the hourly rate, which is proposed to increase from the present $34.50 to $35.55 in 1998 and $36.75 per hour in 1999. This amounts to a 3% increase for next year and a 3.4% increase in the year 1999. The number of hours of protection being proposed for 1998 is the same as 1997 at 9,376 annually. This breaks down as 24-hour per day coverage, 7 days per week, with an additional 8 hours for six months of the year for Fridays and Saturdays, with an additional 200 hours that can be used by the Sheriffs Department at their discretion throughout the year for special purposes. The latest change in the contract added the 200 hours in 1997, and the Sheriffs Department is comfortable with continuing at that level for another year, although they feel an increase will need to be considered in 1999. Our contract allows us to increase or decrease the hours of coverage as lung as we provide sufficient notice to the County Commissioners so they can adjust their budgets accordingly for the next year. Itis the intention of the Police Commission to review and make a recommendation to the City Council on the number of hours that should be considered for the year 1999 by next summer. The Police Commission is not aware of any changes that need to be made to this contract and is recommending Council approval based on the same number of hours at the proposed contract rates set by the County Board. The appropriate amounts have been included in the 1998 budget. B ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Approve entering into a two-year contract for law enforcement services with the Wright County Sheritrs Department at a rote of $35.55 per hour for 1998 and $36.75 per hour for 1999. Do not enter into an agreement. Council Agenda - 10/27/97 y STAFF F..O F.NDATION: It is the recommendation of the City Administrator and the Police Commission that the law enforcement contract be renewed for an additional two years with 1998 continuing at 9,376 hours. It is anticipated that a recommendation will be made to the Council for the number of hours that should be considered for 1999 at a later date. Copy of proposed law enforcement contract LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT v THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 1997, by and between the COUNTY OF WRIGHT and the WRIGHT COUNTY SHERIFF, hereinafter referred to as "County" and the CITY OF MONTICELLO hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Municipality is desirous of entering into a contract with the County for the performance of the hereinafter described law enforcement protection within the corporate limits of said municipality through the County Sheriff; and WHEREAS, the County is agreeable to rendering such services, and protection on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, such contracts are authorized and provided for by the provision of Minnesota Statutes 1.59 and Minnesota Statutes 436.05: NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid statutes, and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed as follows: 1. That the County by way of the Sheriff agrees to provide police protection within the corporate limits of the Municipality to the extent and in the ma»ner as hereinafter set forth: a. Except as otherwise hereinafter specifically set forth, such services shall encompass only duties and functions of the type coming within the jurisdiction of the Wright County Sheriff pursuant to Minnesota Laws and Statutes. b. Except as otherwise hereinafter provided for, the standard level of service provided shall be the sarne basic level of service which is provided for the unincorporated areas of the County of Wright, State of Minnesota. C. The rendition of services, the standard of performance, the discipline of the officers, and other matters incident to the performance of such services and control of personnel so employed shall remain in and under the control of the Sheriff. 1 d. Services purchased pursuant to this contract shall include the enforcement of Minnesota State Statutes, including but not limited to the Traffic Code and the Criminal Code, as v well as all local ordinances enacted in conformance therewith. Statutes and ordinances which prescribe enforcement by a different authority; i.e., the State Electrical Code, the Uniform Building Code, etc., shall be excluded from this agreement. Ordinances pertaining exclusively to purely local city management matters; i.e., sewer and water collection, etc., shall be excluded from this agreement. The Municipality shall be responsible for enforcement of the Municipal Zoning Code, except that the Shea iff will enforce nuisance ordinances conforming to State law; i.e., junk cars, etc. and traffic ordinances; i.e., parking and erratic driving. 2. That it is agreed that the Sheriff shall have full cooperation and assistance from the Municipality, its officers, agents and employees so as to facilitate the performance of this agreement. 3. That the County shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, communication facilities for dispatching, cost of jail detention, and all supplies necessary to maintain the level of service to be rendered herein. 4. The Municipality shall not be liable for the direct payment of any salaries, wages, or other mpensation to any personnel performing services herein for said County. 5. The Municipality shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any of the Sheriffs employees for injuries or sickness arising out of its employment, and the County hereby agrees to hold harmless the Municipality against any such claims. 6. The County, Sheriff, his officers, and employees shall not be deemed to assume any liability for intentional or negligent acts of said Municipality or any officer, agent, or employee thereof. 7. This agreement shall be effective from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1999. 8. The Municipality agrees to pay to the County the sum of $35.55 per hour for law enforcement protection during the calendar year 1998 and $36.75 per hour during the calendar year 1999. If salaries of Deputy Sheriffs are increased at any time during the tern of this contract, the hourly rate of this contract shall —t be increased. a 9. This contract shall be extended automatically for successive one year periods at a rate to be 'l.stablished by the County, unless the County or Municipality shall notify the other of termination, in writing, prior to August 15 of each year. 10. The number of hours of service to be provided pursuant to this contract are as follows: 2A of the Sheriff - 9.376 hours annually and shall provide 24-hour call and general service. The Municipality shall notify the County in writing prior to August 15 regarding any change in the number of hours for the subsequent year 11. The County shall provide for all costs and prosecution efforts with respect to violations charged by the Sheriff in the performance of this agreement. All fines arising from such prosecutions shall accrue to the County. Violations of municipal ordinances excluded from enforcement by this agreement shall be prosecuted by the Municipality at its expense. All fines arising from city prosecutions shall accrue to the Municipality unless otherwise provided by law. 12. Pursuant to law, the County Auditor/Treasurer shall remit to the Municipality its share of all fines collected. The Municipality shall return to the County within 30 days all fine money attributable to prosecutions initiated by the Sheriff in accord with Paragraph 11 of this contract. The Municipality shall keep and retain any fine money submitted by the Auditor/Treasurer attributable to prosecutions initiated by the Municipality 13. For the purpose of maintaining cooperation, local control and general information on existing complaints and problems in said Municipality, one member of the Municipal Council, the Mayor or other person or persons shall be appointed by said Council to act as police commissioners) for said Municipality and shall make periodic contacts with and attend meetings with the Sheriff or his office in relation to the 3 574003 Z. contract herein. 14. The County shall save, hold harmless and defend the City from any and all claims arising from the acts or omissions, including intentional acts and negligence, committed by employees or agents of the County or Sheriff while in the performance of duties in furtherance of this contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Municipality, by resolution duly adopted by it governing body, caused this agreement to be signed by its Mayor and attested by its Clerk; and the County of Wright, by the County Board of Commissioners, has caused this agreement to be signed by the Chairman and Clerk of said Board, and by the Wright County Sheriff, effective on the day and year first above written. Dated: Mayor ATTEST: Clerk Dated: ATTEST: Richard W. Norman County Coordinator Dated: Approved as to form and execution: WRIGHT COUNTY COMMISSION CRS: Dick Mattson, Chairperson Donald 11oumpa Wright County Sheriff Wyman A. Nelson, Wright County Attorney a Council Agenda - 10/27/97 is r: - i •-:d i r M. Representatives from St. Henry's Church have requested that the City initiate feasibility studies necessary in conjunction with completion of public improvements supporting development of the St. Henry's Church site. City staff seeks authorization t.o proceed with this study pending submittal of a formal petition and a deposit in the amount of $5,300, which will be used to finance the cost of the study and will be reimbursed to St. Henry's Church at such time that the project is ordered. Motion to accept petition for public improvements and authorize feasibility study pending submittal of required deposit from St. Henry's Church. Motion to deny petition. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the City Administrator to select alternative # 1. At such time that the deposit is received, City staff will begin the process of determining the best method and financing associated with extension of sewer and water to the site. We will also examine possible alignment alternatives for 7th Street as it extends beyond the site, and we will be contacting Dahlhcimer Distributing and Bondhus Corporation for input as to the preferred location for the 7th Street connection. In a related matter, St. Henry's Church will be asking the Planning Commission and City Council to consider amending the comprehensive plan by relocating or removing the Fallon Avenue overpass from the City's comprehensive plan. This decision will be on the City Council's agenda on the first regular meeting in November. The study will analyze the cost based on the Fallon Avenue bridge being included in the transportation network. 2� c111313nomiirr_ nA'rA• Letter from City Engineer outlining scope of services associated with the proposed feasibility study. S B.A. \li.dand,. P.E. 350 Westwood Lake Office Bra A. x'da. P.E. 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Pan B. Wsit�,n-& eE Minneapolis. MN 55426 Donald W. sl«,,,. r.E Ronald B Bra., P.E 612-541.4800 &.4isociatts, Inc. FAX 541.1700 October 23, 1997 Mr. JeffO'Neill City of Monticello P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Estimate of Cost to Prepare a Feasibility Report for 7' Street Including Streets and Utilities From Its Termination East of Washington Street to CSAH 75. WSB Proposal No. 027.97 Dear Mr. O'Neill: In accordance with your request, we have prepared an estimate of cost to prepare a feasibility report for 7t° Street from Washington Street to CSAH 75. This was originally proposed for only through the St. Henry's Church site. However, in order to adequately evaluate the church site, we are proposing to extend the feasibility report scope to include the remainder of r Stmt to CSAH 75. It may also be necessary to move forward with the trunk sanitary sewer study of the interceptor to serve the southeast Monticello area, this will be addressed separately. We would propose to complete this concept work on a cost -reimbursable basis, with an estimated fee of $5,300. We will provide a feasibility report that addresses the anticipated costs associated with street and utility construction forproposed 7°i Street from Washington Street to CSAH 75. It is anticipated this work could be incorporated into the future engineering for 7th Stmt. We will credit the feasibility report preparation cost in the design fee proportionally to the length at construction completed at the design stage for 71 Street. The feasibility report will be completed for acceptance by the City Council on November 10. 1997. If this proposal is acceptable to you, please sign both copies and return one to us for our records. Please don't hesitate to give me a call at 541.4800 if you have any questions or comments regarding this proposal. Sincerely, WSB d Associates, Inc. f,—� IL L Bret A. Weiss, P.E. City of Monticello Date Vice President �MIW'IOIUi�l4i��l4 x�p Infrastructure Engineers Plannem 513.4 1 OCAI. (WIN IR I l XI n'I MPI! X17 A J Council Agenda - 10/27/97 NEWr , h, , 7r , a, ♦ ,n 4r On September 18, 1997, the City received bids for two pathway bridges and two segments of pathway construction known as the River Walk Pathway and Klein Farms 2nd Addition pathway extensions. We received the bids for the project and, in both instances, the bids were significantly higher than the Engineer's estimate. The bids received are summarized as follows: Bridge Path I Total I Feasibility Estimate River Walk 1 $36,701.25 $17,216.30 $53,917.00 $37,509.00 Klein Farms 2nd $37,715.00 $12,530.58 $50,245.00 $37,918.00 Addition Consequently, the Klein Farms 2nd Addition I'athway construction is proposed to he change ordered into the Klein Farms 4th Addition project, which has been agreed to by the developer of the subdivision. It has been determined that this bridge will be eliminated and a series of culverts will be installed to accommodate the drainage in that area. A land bridge will be constructed to carry the proposed bike path. This work will likely be completed in early Spring 1998. This pathway connects the western half of Klein Farrar to the Little Mountain School side of the development. The bridge along the river on the River Walk segment of the project will require some additional analysis to determine if the style bridge currently proposed is what the Parks Commission would like in this aren, or if another, less expensive, style bridge should be built. This design work will be completed over the winter with the parks department and then the project will be rebid in 1998. H ALTERNATIVL ACTIONS: 1. Reject all bids, change order the Klein Farms 2nd Addition pathway into a land bridge design in the Klein Farms 4th Addition project, and rebid the River Walk segment after a re-evaluation by the parks department. Council Agenda - 10/27/97 Reject the HIein Farms 2nd Addition portion of the project and award the River Walk segment. Award all contracts. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the City Administrator's recommendation that both contracts be rejected at this time and that the Mein Farms 2nd Addition phase be change ordered into the I(lein Farms 4th Addition project as a land bridge path and the River Walk segment be re-evaluated with the parks department and rebid in 1998. Unfortunately, the Parks Commission did not meet and discuss this item prior to this decision; therefore, no recommendation is available from the Commission at this time. Bid tabulation Extension 01,13ids 1997 Pathway Project " 1 I raw„I I•nJ rn nlwn.'rwun�l.l ul .aural INu y,.m. n..u,r l.,,v.a almr.rlb. allm.a. IA,,,J III Ilm t'.I,.r III/1I'ny.vr A'x IUJ11IUl IU7919 IMr UWIWyJ ' dnolff Corrfcl»C B1E 111, al. ,r u w,• v (ux IIIJAn:rJ/,.I, IIJ4•, 4.,I,�w, I.xw IW 11!•W+ h.. I,.x M, Ir rax. Iw SCIIL'dlllc A - Cily Project No. 97 -(IBI; kivc»..SMI. Pathway L.IIIw1.»a..allw.r Im11 � Ix,a , .xa LI. Illln. I1r.� Ilan,. , I. «am.�ln , �II .»,II.I...1».I lllr,r .m .a L. .d ,.. •. .,.�„ a...•...~I, , In,.11..1I1.�I.�,1ll,ll .�.1 .. ..,. 77 I':nhwny Reconstruction 11—.— „I,,,I,». FOYA1.SCI 11:D111.1:A rax , uul., un.11. L�I,�:`�.• «.«, I 1. .. L. �..., ..x.111hI:,L.M —r�� � Schcdolc 11 - City Noicct No. 96.051' I Ij Klein Palms 2nd Addition Pathway In •vna,n� » �I �µ�..+ry ..�na.. l«11. LLuu II r1l L� un � uu. lol.� 1,.In ala I.. n� .In�..o...rl 11x 1a .,�. ala r. ala loan. «,wull a �uw»+i1lu., l,'Ia.11111...wwlllu.la 1'11 I., a=I. I I,I. al.� 11H. L,la ' 1ra,. n lrr. «�..,x�l « �a»»xl»I, Ir •I IW..1 � wan n., ll'..-� � .r.,. ,•w, I IIx,. ,•.,,� I uV,u� I IMAL SI'lll:l)I11.1(11 'Il l•1•A 1, n.a,el E-mension ol'Bids Pedestrian Bridge Construction I'— Im) PA)IIM'A\ rR011 i 1 -CII VPROJI li NO 97 W A W.OSP I,•,nn Ale•.l14 A,-- IM+IN1., Ta l'•Ia5 11'AII I'nyrIM• 1.25MA 1.1W IY♦- WIMI ' Dllrbin Ca1KIN Bld •vA.a,m y'nt1 Yvl•w r YWr! M. Mw.I .� .. IAw IA•wn fxn Iw Schedule A - Riverwalk BriJgc (City Project No. 97-08C) I u.+v, A \ n1.A•IaA rr.la ro wnv 1 I .•,. Yr wrt m •n . • wl 1 Y .r bAs r Iw. .• .r r. 1 n A 1 Ir YI 1., - 1-1, I r.r Mr\ Omr ♦ Iw•I rl rA IIJVA ua uwr uY Ir nmr Ueuw \ ulnlwl I•.\rl♦e lulll.d lNT rl•w'llr•il a 1H vla ll�a,n llu an •r+vl•Alluwnrl a+14u1 wr wm u,n+4 , al 1 ♦ I i u .I n l 5ann I I I w uhm Ylm• • M Aol A IYM •1•AIIM IMI'I Vr Ilam Ina• • o. •n) w ♦I ♦Ir 11A1 1\M lu 1 ua Ylm IYVr I• I'll •n) A 411IIM1 11. lu All l.11\ IIb 11 rw Ilm Ilrr SUIV101 A1. SCIWDULE A Ih.hh 1'M 1�+Iw1r AIfN•rr Imo. Y. AI•. ,Aaw. ♦. x n.xl+.. ti Il••rl Ati Iw Schedule 11 - Klein I ;ants 2nd Addition Bridge (City Ihoject No. 96.051') Iw •!, . --t A. r Iw rale .051 1 r .•. wam 1 1Mi+,. b .I M11r11 YI,11 pA.\Irt • rrw WA• wl)• 1 lhl+J• • MI r11 ♦1 a bA•\11nn1 In♦nlp lrt w+ . n I1 .1,• 1 a•I W • \ • n l•♦ \I A\A .F Imf iu Im wwr Il nbn 1 n1•1 u11 IAIf1IA5u4u p•IM'l l\Ir11.11•IV llnll r s .®a In woe • hn r•I + rAI IIW •11111♦unn 1 Ir Illr•m Il lnn 1 ul ml !•+ •AI IIw •I11 Inl,nrl nr Ilha 111.• • wl Y•I 1 Yu f , w I V. Y.m Il mle • 1111 YY p • ♦ 1I r Yrr li •oe Ix l•rl ro 11 ♦4 rIIwI r1M 1•♦h I+II\ IMII mw 11m Inxe S1111101•AL SCHEDULE A IhI •n 101'A1, Ir.rm YC•Ib ta•Hr3kr lnllnn aWrr 1Nlu• IIJAr In••wM •N.•�t'r lr. Irrf•IJA '•rh•n lv.l r,rm Iw h.. tw n.. Iw Irm r.m I.m n+r n11 In,r• I r lo•r rawer 1!•\mn Y•r lu•u .. ulmn uvwr mw,.• In lr,.� Ina•. Ilea e, Il.)Inu Ilnm 1).•Vn rlm .ora pnm Irm.l• alm 1,Imn Yum 111.41n ra IWoe ym 14Vw er I e ra Ilun Ilu I1wn 1. •. Ilrn Irrram Ir,pl l` Ir•1•a Im Yn+l+ • • 11.1,• io Ill` Im I!IVm • + Il!Ira •1 u I r•r Illmw lar I. 1 w,u Yuie Iluw Ill,l.n. IIw I• Ir •rw II ••n, 1•n4 rem YIP•• Imr 1•uun 4m ••Ile nm I♦V I• Vr� Il w,w IrV III •hn rm Il.lmm wm µuw� Wa 111rn Ila Yun Im 111•n 1•V Yrw In nIV Yl ul l• Y•)rIP IrIMm� Ir IIIY 111.1 111• Council Agenda - 10/27/97 SD. Conalderation of Change Order No. 2 for Rriar Oakes ERtate 2nd :.Q_i This change order is proposed to clean up certain construction issues that were modified during the construction project, specifically related to stone sewer construction. These modifications were completed in an effort to minimize grading operations while maintaining adequate drainage of the site. The original contract price as bid was $496,791.44. This change order totals $8,933.20, which results in a new contract price of $505,724.64. Consideration of approval of Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $8,933.20. Deny approval of Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $8,933.20. It is the recommendation of the City Engineer that this change order be approved so that we can proceed to process final payment on this project and move forward with levying the project assessments. Copy of change order. CHANGE ORDER City Project No. 96-02C WSB Project No. 1023.00 Date of Issuance: October 27, 1996 Engineer: WSB 8 Associates, Inc. 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents' description: Purpose of Change Order: This Change Order provides for payment of miscellaneous changes completed during the construction process. The conduit was placed fru the utility companies and the storm sewer modifications were completed to save the character of the property Attachments: (list documents supporting change) Not applicable. Change Order No. 2 Project: Briar Oakes 21 Addition Owner: City of Monticello Contractor: Richard Knutson, Inc. 5 -- 12885 Rhode Island Avenue South Contract Price Prior to This Change Order: Savage, MN 55378 CHANGE ORDER City Project No. 96-02C WSB Project No. 1023.00 Date of Issuance: October 27, 1996 Engineer: WSB 8 Associates, Inc. 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents' description: Purpose of Change Order: This Change Order provides for payment of miscellaneous changes completed during the construction process. The conduit was placed fru the utility companies and the storm sewer modifications were completed to save the character of the property Attachments: (list documents supporting change) Not applicable. CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Price: Original Contract Completion Date: $496,791.44 September 30, 1996 ivious Change Orders No. = to No. _ Net Change from Previous Change Orders: 5 -- 0 Days Contract Price Prior to This Change Order: Contract Time Prior to This Change Order: $496,791.44 September 30, 1996 Net Increase (Decrease) of This Change Order: Net Increase of Change Order: 58,933.20 0 Days Contract Price With All Approved Change Orders: Contract Tlme With Approved Change Orders: $505,724.64 September 30, 1996 Recommended By: Approved By: Brat A. Weiss, P.E. City Engineer Approved By: I Approved By: John Simola, Public Works Director Rick Wollsteller, City Administrator Richard Knutson, Inc. Contractor Date of Council Action: 5D -I F uric W sx o r •" PROMAT TITLE.: BRI 4R /)AAF_N 2X1 AI{I/ITION PROJECT LOCATION: NIONTI('EI.1.11• MII(NKSOTA WSB PROJECT NO.: 1023M U. Clgpa Or&, No. 2 Ori Npr. Na Nw UruriMio. I 7101)01 l'1 119111 I'I IIIl 41111191. till AI \I WIM 2 Jf01 M1 12. 111' P114 q.1 It N\11.19 N•Ib I'1 V J 2w1 SIS 1I7'IIS'mm-ov- 7NX 11 uu""��1'$X4051 M I A 11,01 43 %IIISMI' (}{AR41'R`MIN I.I IIN' 1011 1. kk�A*A k li - fu" Ihkr NN. 2 'GRAND TOTAL VOUCIIER DETAIL 1 -IST' NA': Illi RA'I F.: 10/13199 A'OI IC'1 O R N, ('OIIUXt1 1 unv •rl 1 omplrtrA TNI. Al.�nlll lobi to lbb (1...{117v■11 Iona r.Irr I LId rrl« vII•nl,l2 1 �anl t)..n01) I wX1 1 I11M1'VIIM fI.1t11•I $1 .1.7 XI IIMI S1.21117 IN, IIMI S1,2971M1 I IIIMP SI IM I IMI $11,441 711 I IMI SI!N1 711 1 IIIMP 41 iM 41.f/)W fl fll lu IM $1,4741X1 IIMI Sl.1741M1 1 MMP AI n.1 It—w %SI. SN I IMI 5414411 I 5414191 ] IM11 f{oS 00 {IMoon 21N. SI61111M1 21X1 $1 h1111M1 M.IINI SX!i11211 5%4112U I I I SS97,111 11 1 1 f0 411 20 I 15111,044 0h Council Agenda - 10/27/97 5E. Cnnsidpxatoonofei resolution declarinarogttahi-.nssessed and ordering preparatatin of a proposed nFisftsment for high school trunk Storm PaaI The high school trunk storm sewer project was awarded to Arcon Construction Company in July and is now nearing completion. The project involved installation of trunk storm sewer through the new high school site that will provide trunk storm sewer benefits to the Cardinal Hills development in addition to the school properties and will also provide lateral benefits for the new high school facility. Since the proposed assessments will affect a number of parcels in the Cardinal Hills development along with the school facility, an assessment hearing should be held yet this fall prior to December 1. Adoption of this resolution will set the public hearing on the assessment roll for November 24, our second meeting in November. WSB & Associates will be preparing a final assessment roll for this meeting, and public hearing notices will be mailed to all benefiting property owners two weeks in advance of this date. Adopt a resolution declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation of proposed assessment roll for Project 97.07C. Do not adopt a resolution at this time. In order to complete the assessment roll process prior to December 1, it is the recommendation of the City Administrator that this resolution be adopted and that the City Engineer be authorized to prepare an assessment roll for this project. It is proposed that the assessments be spread over 10 years at an interest rate of 1.5% higher than the rate we receive on our bond sale Monday evening. G� . Copy of resolution. RESOLUTION 97 - RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR HIGH SCHOOL TRUNK STORM SEWER PROJECT 97-07C WHEREAS, a contract has been let with Arcon Construction, Inc., for the improvement of 2,800 ft of 12 -inch RCP storm sewer between School Boulevard and County Road 118 through the high school property, and the contract price for such improvement is $224,554.50, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement are estimated to be $62,875, so that the total cost. of the improvement would be $287,429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is estimated to be $136,600, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefiting property owners would be $150,829. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1998, and shall bear interest at the rate of _% per annum from the date of adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of Consulting Engineer, WSB & Associates, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specifically assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file it copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. A hearing shall be held on the 24th day of November in the city hall at 7 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment, and at such time and place, all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given the opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 5. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice Die total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to each owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Sc. 1 Resolution 97 - Page 2 The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November lb, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of October, 1997. Mayor City Administrator SE,- 0" t.. Council Agenda - 10/27/97 .nnsi� M" (R. W.) The City Council is again asked to adopt an assessment roll for utility billing accounts which are delinquent more than 60 days and to certify the assessment roll to the County Auditor for collection on next year's real estate taxes if not paid by November 30, 1997. The delinquent utility accounts that are included with the agenda are accounts that are at least 60 days past due and include all new delinquents from the last time we certified them. In addition to the delinquent amount, the Council also previously approved the establishment of an administrative fee of $25 per account that is added to each delinquent assessment. The amounts shown on the enclosed delinquent utilities list include the additional $25 administration fee for the preparation of the assessment roll. It is recommended that the delinquent accounts be put on an assessment roll for certification in 1998 at an interest rate of 8% as allowed by state statute. As in the past, if any accounts are paid within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll, they can be paid without the additional interest. After 30 days, payments will he charged interest and can be accepted up to November 30, 1997. 1. Adopt the assessment roll for the delinquent charges as presented. 2. Based on public hearing input, adjust the assessment roll as required It is staff recommendation that the Council adopt the assessment roll as presented. All of the accounts are at least 60 days past due and have been given proper notice of this assessment hearing and ample opportunity to pay the accounts in full. All utility accounts were notified that there would be an additional $25 administrative fee attached to each outstanding balance if the account was not paid by 4:30 p.m. on October 20, 1997. 1] SUPPORTING llA1'A: Copy of resolution adopting assessment roll; Complete listing of delinquent accounts to be certified. RESOLUTION 97 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for delinquent utility accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the parcels named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in one (1) annual installment payable on or before the first Monday in January 1999 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1998. 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment W the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution. 4. The City Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to Cho county auditor to be extended on the proper tax list of the county, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of October, 1997. Mayor City Administrator 7-0 IO/?7/97 11.5: Oil :. 1997 OELO UTILITY B' S CERTIFECAT!NS WITH LATE CHARGE PAGE 1 Account 6 RIO a Procerty Adorns APT Custaoer One Cust N." ? 0"'30 Day C 0 Day O,"So Day P.r12C 04Y Lae Total 6 Past No Past Due Past Due Past Duo Cher;e ./Late cu, ;e 100250000 155040001020 ?25 RIVER ST E MICHAEL PELARSKI 5131 CEDAR LAKE RD 59.03 .00 Co. .00 25.01 114.03 IC032COOD 155010055040 307 RIVER 51 M PATTY POMM 307 RIVER 51 W 1:0.37 .00 .00 .00 :: AO 115.33 IC0330000 155010055051 1 LOCUST ST TED MONGER I LOCUST S1 45.59 .00 .02 .00 25.00 71 69 100400000 ISSOIC05AO91 1 LOCUST S1 VERMES BIDS TIC PO BOX 5T7 55.17 .00 .00 .00 25.00 50.17 100450000 155010063040 701 FRONT $T DICK RICE 301 FRONT S1 M 1 16 .99 .00 .00 .00 25.00 111.99 1005:0000 15501CO560J0 113 RIVER ST M MENDY BELLESEN PO BOX 1225 12.10 .00 .00 00 15.00 37.10 100670000 155010:60050 101 RIVER SI M STEVE ROLFE 901 R!VER S1 0 0:.15 .00 .00 00 :S.CO IC) 75 10053COOD 155010014100 1:1 RIVER 51 N RACHAEL SMITH 974 R!VER S1 W 73.01 .00 .00 CO 25.00 91.01 101260000 155015005150 314 RIVER 51 E RONALD BEGIN 721 RIVER 57 E 139.14 .00 .00 .00 ?E.00 164.14 MINN., 1:50150?5050 925 BROANAT E VEIT ENUE PO BOX 253 71.10 .00 .00 .00 ?5.00 59.10 200190000 155015016010 110 WASHINGTON 51 LEE 6 JE01HE UECKER 110 WASHINGTON 51 16.10 .00 .00 .00 25.00 101.10 700330000 155015004010 149 BROADWAY E PETER 6 CHRIS KOMAREK 149 BROADWAY E 119.:! .00 .00 .00 ?5.00 114 ?8 700710000 155010019019 117 BROADWAY W JEREMY/RESFCU LNDFRSO PO BOX 1171 80 90 .CO .00 .00 25.00 105.90 200100000IS50IC047010 1117 VINE 57 REED OR URI DIMARAIS PIT BOX 611 117./0 1.19 .00 .DO :5 OJ 144.29 200910000 155070005111 1011 BROADWAY M CNOA.N WYTRYSYA 1011 BROADWAY M 113.S3 .10 .OG 00 ?5.00 113 53 201710000 155010076041 209 WALNUT 51 JUDY WRIGHT PO COX 494 $0. 1: .00 .00 00 :5 00 75.12 100110000 155040007030 131 7RD ST E JAMES AGOSTO PO BOX 196 110 :1 .00 .Co .00 ?5 00 143 :1 300360000 155010037010 319 7RD 51 M CLARENCE MCCARTY 119 7R0 ST W 97.11 00 .CO .D0 :5 09 C: U 300710000 155010078050 711 LINN 51 DAVID U DEBRA MEVISSEN 211 LINN 57 16 55 00 00 .00 15 00 101 55 30060000D 1550100:1060 107 MINNESOTA 51 KEVIN MINIM 103 MINNESOTA SI 140 95 .(O Co .CO 25 00 177.96 300990000 155010070100 300 IRO 51 E GERALD SOMSIEBY PO COX 1079 89 71 .00 .00 OC :5 00 IIA 10 30103000D 155040004040 136 )Rn SI E TAVY FRENCH 136 JRD S1 E 10A.S1 AD 00 .00 ?5 00 1:9 50 400110000 155015035010 415 IN SI E FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH a t I UX 51 E 00 U .00 CO .00 :5 CO 105 63 400460DOD 155010077030 113 ATM S7 M MELINDA M VICKERS 613 TIM 51 N 101.15 .00 AD 00 :5 00 1:6 OS 400100000 1550110050:0 705 4TH ST E MAYNE COX 106 1TH SI E 50.60 .00 .0C .00 :5 CJ In.60 SOOAIC17D0 155010009070 613 6TH 51 M EILEEN SOLBERG ESTATE C/O TEO SOLCERO 11.20 .00 .00 .00 :S OD U :0 600/60000 155017002010 12:0 SANDY U PAUL FUSS 1100 CR H 86 OS .00 .00 00 25 CO tit 05 606110000 155020002070 11:9 RIVER S1 W NITA CERN 1129 RIVER 51 W 51.21 7 51 .00 .00 11.co 11.75 601160000 155SONIANO 0:7 RIVER ST M 1 CHRIS EIERKE 1723 RIVER 51 N 11 71 OS .CO .01 .00 ?5 00 96 65 601:00000 1SSSC003/210 1327 RIVER 51 M S DOI 6 MELANIE HANS 13:3 RIVER S1 N 15 15.97 09 CO 00 ?S CO 10.97 601250093 15550003/200 1327 RIVER ST N 10 KMISTOFFER CON EIVA 1327 RIVER 51 W 110 40.01 .00 .00 .00 ?5 CC 65 CA 60713CCCO 1550:1002050 107 MATTHEW CU GERALD PIAil PO BOX 27S 11,71 00 AD .00 15 OD 112.21 50291C000 1555000)710] ISOS HILLTOP DR RITCHIE JOW0 1505 HILLTOP OR 91 10 .CO 07 .00 :5 CO 119 60 70109.000 155509112401 1305 OAKWOOD DR E L 6 N 1=141ES (RENTAL UNIT) 70.10 .00 .90 .00 :5 CO 15.10 701090100 1563COIC101 1105 OAKWI= OR E l 1 M ASSOCIATES IICS OAAMOCD 00 E 71 IS CO .03 .00 25 C: 46 75 70:97.000 155500113113 119 OAKWOOD OR E MDUUWD IRA%WIiIAIIDN 93.51 CO CD .00 :5 CO 110 $6 800?10000 155CIIOOIIBO 111 JERRY IIEFERT DR RICHARD L G:AAtl 117 JERRY LIEFERI 02 155 IC .00 OC .00 25 CD 159 C7 800230000 155011002010 112 KEVIN LONGLEY DR MICHAEL PENSION 112 KEVIN LODU1Y OR ID 17 .00 00 .CO 25 00 65 73 101070020 155026003016 120 MARVIN ELWOOD RD JAPES JOHNSON 178 MARVIN ELWODD RD 164 55 .00 .00 .00 ?5 00 109 05 0010960".0 155071007[60 101 HEDA" LA JAMES RCLEMJ 108 HEDMO LA 11 A: CD .00 .09 25 00 S9 A2 8011000.10 155011CO7050 80354C000 155CISCOA690 117 MEDIUM LA 105 CROCUS U LARDY METCALF JIM 6 U21 HAIVOIr"A 117 HEDMO U ICS CCDCJS LA Al 39 it: 56 CO .CO C. 00 C0 OD :6 C? 171 39 137 C6 Q 0035TOOC2 155033004010 107 CRJCUS CIO TINA KMLIM ICY CIa7CU! C!R 90 11 .CO ,CD CO :S C3 171 31 OOJUCCCO ISSO13C0A OSO 109 CROCUS 011 B. CORD N 6 C. HAMSN 100 CCOM CIO An,u .DO CO CO 75 C0 139 is 801170000 1530)500)020 711 :19 MARVIN EM EIMOW RO MILIIAP LNCI[Y 719 MARYIN FLIADD RD 05.01 .00 .00 CO 75 00 171 Co 00101PCC0 15503500301D 251 2U MARVIN ELMOOD 40 611.1.10 LN:LEY 249 MARVIN ELWOOD RD 71.07 .00 CO .CO 25 CO 95 07 003890009 155035CO3C60 116 Cl= LA WON CLUHN 116 CROCUS LA C0 Is CO AD CO 25 C3 IIS 14 CITY OF MNTICELLO 10/21/97 11 .58 01 CTR :. 1997 DELO UTILITY BILLING CERTIFICATIONS WITH LATE CHARGE PAGE ACCourt I P. Property Address APT Custm r Am Cut; _e : OVr30 Day DVr6O Day 0vr90 Day Ovrl27 Day Late - Tcta) I Past Ovt Past Due Put O:a Past O:e Charge ./Late CKarpt 80/050000 1550'.50011CC 230 114RVLN ELWOOD RD D04ALO WOOD 230 IORVIM ELWD00 RD 96.23 .C7 ... .00 :5.00 121.13 80407CBC7 155735001110 22E MARV!N ELWOOD RD KATIE LAWRENCE 225 FA RV IN ELWOOD RD 131.54 .00 .CO .00 25.00 115.114 BO4240000 155031001070 143 HEOMAN LA JAMES CELLETTE 143 NE DRUM LA 13:.92 .00 .00 .03 25.00 157.1: 80416051C0 155031004010 135 MEDMAN ll KENNETH ROSSBERG 135 HEDMAN LA 1.1.31 .00 .00 00 25.00 47.31 804350000 IS502fi001750 109 MARVIN ELWOOD Jr MIKE i MARY WHITE 109 MARVIN ELWOOD RD 88.10 .00 .00 .00 25 00 11:.60 900120000 155030001050 III KAMPA CIA MICHAEL WRONI 111 KAMPA CIR 71.1.8 .00 .00 .00 25.00 I0.58 901610000 155033001090 5 SANOTRAP CIR LEE SCOTT 5 SANOTRAP CIR 112.63 3.54 .00 CC 23 00 141.17 901830000 155033003110 .2 FAIRWAY DR JOHN 6 PAMELA GAET2 22 FAIRNAY DR $9 24 .00 .00 .DC 25.00 84.24 9019:0000 155073003010 18 EAGLE CIR JACK e1PPER 18 EAGLE CIR 85.88 .O7 .00 .. 25 CC 71'..51 1001450000 15501100:020 406 RIVERVIEW OR LEE 4 TAMMY SUTTON 406 RIVERJIEN DR 69,70 00 0D OC 25 00 94.10 1002600000 155071001010 670 RIVERVIEW OR RICK S LORI 8LOMPERG 670 RIVERVIEW DR 61.17 .CO .CC .07 25 OC 86 11 1003290000 155086002150 6160 MILL RUN RD THOMAS AEMYON 6160 MILL RUM RD 99.06 .00 .00 .00 2$ 70 121 06 1003310000 155086002130 6165 MILL RUN RD LLOYD WRIGHT 6161 MILL RUM RD 105.01 .00 OC .CO 25.:0 131 C6 100400000O ISSO16005200 6157 MILL RUN RD JENNIFER CROSS 6157 MILL RUM RO 95.38 00 .00 00 25 00 1;0 31 1103150000 155015002080 930 MEADOW OAK OR JAY i SIACIE TROMBELY 930 MEADON OAK OR 63.13 .00 Q .07 25.00 8! 13 1105490000 155(a5001010 2751 OARVIEW LA TIM 4 JENIFFER BAOER 2761 OAAV!EM LA 12.75 .00 .DO .00 25.00 91 76 1106699700 155059002090 2181 MEADOW LA PETER HOLIMAUS 2111 READCW LA 67.19 2.03- co. .00 25.00 16 16 1107070000 155010002100 2527 BRIAR OAKES BLVD DAVID 4 JAMI SCHNART2 2521 BRIAR OAAES BLYO 90 91 .00 .0C .CO 25.00 IS 97 110937C000 155080002790 2810 OAK RIDGE DR STEVE KLAAS[ 2810 OAK RIDGE OR 91.01 .00 00 01 25.60 IY 01 1109:50000 1$5010006150 2760 OAKVIEM C1 MARK COADY 2110 OANYIG CT 93 OE .00 00 CC 23.00 118 76 1109600000 155050OC6200 2660 DARVIEW Cl SAM EDWAR35 2660 OAKY!EW CI 99.34 .01 OC co 25 C0 121 31 120001CCC0 155SOO15140) 201 AJELLBERO'S PARK PAUL CARLSON 201 KJ ELLBERG'S PARK 20.80 .00 OO 00 2S 00 15.80 1200020002 155500151403 203 KJELLEERO'S PARK KJELLBERO'S INC (MONEY SMITH) 70.00 .00 .CC .00 25 DO 55 00 12000300[0 155500151407 202 KJELLBERG'S PARK DANA DEMPSEY 202 ILJELLBIRG'S PARK 31.:0 .00 C0 C0 23 DO 56 20 12000500[0 155500151403 NS KJELLBERO'S PARK KATMIE WOOL 205 KJELLILR0'S PARK 10.40 .00 .OD .00 25.00 35 40 120009DOt0 1555001$1107 211 KJELLEERG'S PARK PAM DAHLBERG 211 KJELLBERG'S PARK 11.20 .00 .00 00 25 CO 56 3 1200100070 155500154403 710 KJELLSERO'S PARK MARIY HANSON 210 KJELLBERG'S PARK N 80 .00 00 OC 25 00 45 63 .1 12D0140000 1$5500151103 211 KJE1.1.8ERO'S PARK ARTHUR DORAN 214 KJELLIIRO'S PARK 20.10 .00 .00 OC 2$ 00 15 17 1200170000 155500154107 211 KJELLBERO'S PARK LAURA ROMAN 217 AJELLBERG'S PARK 41.10 .00 .00 .00 25.00 66.60 1200210000 155500151103 221 KJELLBERO'S PARK BILL ALFAMO 221 KJELLBERG'S PARR 20 10 00 00 00 23.00 )5.80 1200240000 155500151403 221 KJELLBERG'S PARK JEFF LENA 224 KJELLBERG'S PARA 20.10 .00 .00 .00 25.00 45 10 120019COD0 ISSSC0154407 112 KJ(LIBERG'S PARK DIANE GORR 112 KJ ELLEERO'S 04PI II 40 .00 .00 .0C 25.00 15.40 1200510060 155SCO1SAIC3 110 RJELLBERO'S PARK DOUG BLCMOLIISI 110 AIELLBERG'S PARK 20.10 .00 .00 .00 25 00 45 t0 000530000 155$00151103 108 KJELLBERG'S PARK MARY MASS 101 KJELI8IR0'S PARA 11.20 .00 .00 00 25.00 SL20 1203570030 155500151103 104 KJELLBERG'S PARA STACY PEGLOW PO BOA 1241 20 10 .00 00 00 25.00 14 00 1200610002 155500151103 3 KJELLBERG'S PARA KJELLBERG'S INC (LORI BEILAND) IO 00 .00 00 .00 25 00 13 00 1203660000 155500151403 S KJELLBIRG'S PARK FON/LYNETTE RICHAROSOR 5 KJELLBERO'S PARA 31.3 .00 .00 Co. 25 00 56 .10 120067C000 155500151403 1 AJELLCERO'S PARK VICKI HURD 6 RJELLEM'S PARK 31.20 .00 .00 .00 25.00 56 20 120CE80002 1SS500151403 7 AJELLBERO'S PARK IIJELLBEL'0'S INC 10EYAL GUODALJ 10 00 .00 .CO .00 2S 00 15 00 1200100000 155500151103 1 KJELLBERO'S PARK ROBERT WRICMI 9 IJELLIERO'S PARK 10.10 .00 .00 07 25 00 35.10 1200760000 155500151403 14 KJELLBEU'S PARK JIM 4 (DNI SWEETER It RJELLEERO'8 PARR 10 40 .00 CO 80 25 00 H 40 y 1200170060 IS ES00151403 IS KJELLEERO'S PARK DONOVAN eMwM 15 AJELLELRO'S PARK 10.40 .OG 00 .CO 25.00 D 40 1200790030 155500151403 If KJELLBERO'S PARK TERGA GEAMAM 17 AJELLB[00'S PARK 31,20 .00 .00 .03 23.00 56 3 120[0IOCDO 155500151407 11 KJEIlOE RD'S PARK SAM 4 AIR SAFIIOM I9 AJELLDERO'S PARK 10.40 .00 .00 .00 25 00 15 t0 e 1X0810700 1556COISt10) 21 KJELLCICO'S PA0.. TODD PECLN 21 RJELLC(RJ'S PARK 11.20 .00 DO .00 2! C0 1.6 3 123CCA 0600 1SSSC0151403 101 KJELLCERG'S PARK DIANE HEMSILLO 101 4JELLt[M'S PARR 10.40 .00 ,CO .CO 25 00 15 40 \� J 1200770000 155570151403 110 AJELLCERO'S PARK LORI PALMER 6 KU53 AAT 110 AJELLEIRO'S PARK 10.10 .00 .00 00 23 00 73 to CITY OF MCNIICELLO 97 11.51.01 OTR 2, 1991 DELO UTILITY BILLING CERTIF"ATIONS WITH LATE CHARGE PAG, 3 Account R PID I ProOerty Address APT Custooer lace Cult Rau 2 Ovr30 Day Ovr60 Day Gvr90 Day D:r;;. ' t„<,1 1 Past Duo Past D u Past Duo Past 0.:#r Ctarp ./Late Cha'Ge 1200959009 15`.500151103 112 RJELLBERG'S PARK LYNETTE CARR 112 LJELL8ERG'S PARS 10.40 .00 .00 .00 .5.00 35.40 1200990000 15550015//03 376 AJELLBERG'S PARK A10 TREPANIEA 316 RJELLBERG'S PARK 20. LO .00 .CO .00 :5.00 45.80 1201090000 155500ISS403 408 KJELLSERO'S PARK CATHERINE PERKINS 401 KJELLBERG'S PARK 10.40 .CO .00 .00 :5.00 35 40 1201130000 155500151103 401 AJELLBERO'S PARR ROSE MEYEA 401 KJELLBERG'S PARK 20.80 .00 .CO .00 ;5.00 45.80 1201160001 155500154403 401 RJELLSERG'S PARK AJELLBERG'S IVC (DENNIS HESSE) .10.80 .00 .00 .00 25.00 45 !a 1201200000 155500154403 504 ILALLBERG'S PARK BETTY JACKRAN Sol KJELLBER0'S PARA ;0.10 .00 .00 .00 ;5.00 15.80 121C000000 155500151403 1000 KJELLBERG'S PARR RJELLBERG'S INC 1000 KJELLBERG'S PARK 121.91 .00 .00 .00 25.00 152.91 1300050D00 155069003050 5090 StARL IMG OR DENNIS A SIG JEWETT $090 STARLING OR 77.62 .00 .00 .00 25.00 102.62 1302190090 155073005029 5,110 STIALING OR JAMES LEVIS 52A0 STARLING OR 68.02 .00 .00 00 25.00 93.02 1302250000 155010004050 5340 51ARLIMO OR MARCUS LIRDAIA 5340 STARLING OR 117.6D .00 .00 .00 23.00 142.60 13.12130090 155088001030 9120 PELICAN LA REBECCA ROEPRE 1120 PELICAN LA 11.65 .00 .00 .CO 25.00 113.65 1302150000 ISSDIIO03050 93D ROCAINGIIRD L1 LORI ANDERSON 9,160 MOCKINGBIRD LA 18. t1 .W .CO .00 25.00 103 11 1102570900 ISs0If002040 9371 MOCKINGBIRD LA JON i ELIZABETH ACRE 1371 MOCKINCBIRO LA 122.67 .00 .00 .00 25.00 117.61 1302990000 155078003110 5430 FALCON AVE R!CHARD/BRENDA ANDEM 5430 FALL M AVE 11.01 .00 .00 .00 25.00 113.04 1303010000 155078002160 5S21 FALCON AVE HARK ACRE 5521 FALCON AVE 17.00 .00 .00 .00 25.00 1 16 .00 13033OCCOD 155069002010 5010 PARTIN OR PAI 00111E 5010 MARTIN DR 53.15 .00 .00 .00 25.00 T8 75 1303390000 155069002020 $080 MARTIN OR LAURIE KOEP PC COM 121 65.11 CO .00 Co. 25.00 90.18 1303110000 155011006020 $133 MARTIN DR JENNIFER GAMMON $111 MARTIN OR 17. is .00 .00 .DO 25.00 112.88 1401170000 155090001060 9119 RED RCCK LA DAVID OftEN 9149 RED ROCK LA 19.39 .00 .00 .C2 25 09 94 19 1401700000 155090003150 1111 FARMSTEAD OR STEVE A MARINA REISMUS 1799 FARMSTEAD OR 4714 .00 .09 .00 25 00 12.24 1/01740000 155090003190 1167 FARMSTEAD OR BRADLEY ERIASDN 1167 FAMIE40 OR 101.61 .CO .00 .02 25.00 126.60 1401770000 155090003220 4111 FARMSTEAD DA ANDREW RESTI 1743 FARMSTEAD OR 11.91 .00 .00 .CO 25.00 102 91 90200430100 155010067100 255 !ROADWAY E ON RALPH A MARY AIFFNEYER 11190 20151 AVE NE 10.40 .00 .00 co. 25.09 35 10 90600611190--7AA600417163--901-JYW4SOIA tl -- 41c" IAMSW 007-M1MNEb07A 51 - /0 76 iI 11 1'.6A 1' 31 !S 81, 33.36- Ir le 90501610200 155011001050 S01 RMSEY ST PAUL ROBINSON 501 RMSEY SI 11.20 .00 .00 .07 25.00 56.20 ' 90501650100 ISSO/1001060 N] RARSEY 51 MIMA3 CONDDN $13 RARSEY ST 10.11 .I1- .00 .CO 25 DO 35 00 90501{80100 155047000010 518 WRIGHT 51 PAMELA 51EFFES 519 WRIGHT St 11.20 .00 .00 .00 25.00 56.:0 905018SC103 155029001020 207 itR S1 E 6 ADMIRED POOPERIIES (RELISL LANDMARK) 11.20 .00 .00 .00 25.00 56.20 9CS01161201 155029001020 707 MIK SI E 12 ADMIRED PROMRT IES (SARA MANAMA) 10.00 .00 .00 .07 25 00 ]5.07 900031301CO 155015003010 217 RARVIN ELW000 RD UDE NILLIM LWaIEY (SANDRA WIGNTRAM) 1] 12 .00 .00 .00 25.00 31 12 910CC11D1CO 155011003190 159 RIVERVIEW CR 3 CURRENT 1EMANt 1$9 RIVERVIEW DR 11 20.11 .CO .00 .00 25.00 15.10 91000410502 155011003190 159 RIVERVIEW DA 5 JEWS RIVEME-D HEIKES (PATRICK T KRUGER) 11.20 .00 .00 .09 25 00 56.20 9100CAACTO0 155014001195 159 RIVERVIEW CO 1 BRIAN A LIMY HAWAII 159 RIVERVIEW 02 17 11.20 .CO .00 .00 25 CO 56.20 TOTALS 0706_77---44.13-_ __-17.14- ii 21 Bp�S.y� ss Ie 4,0-1,9 ii�o.9H •'••' E N D O F R E P 0 R 1 ... •. CITY W 4001tICELLO Council Agenda - 10/27/97 •, , ,.� , .• r. a1 .1 INC Bids will be received on Monday morning at I 1 a.m., October 27, for the issuance of $1,575,000 in G.O. bonds to finance the Klein Farms 4th Addition improvement project. Bids will be tabulated by our financial advisor, Springsted, Inc., and will be presented to the City Council Monday evening along with a recommendation. As I previously noted, Springsted, Inc., was advised to lower the size of the bond issue from the original $2.3 million offering down to the $1.575 million as a result of additional information I had obtained from the developer on the anticipated build -out of the project. Originally, we had planned to sell bonds for 10 years and assess the project over the same time period, but the developer, Tony Emmerich, feels very confident that he plans on developing the 4th phase within 2-3 years. If this is the case, it did not make sense to have bonds outstanding for up to 10 years if prepayment occurred in a rapid manner as projected. In addition, the size of the project was reduced to compensate for the high school storm sewer portion that will likely be paid in advance also. Revised recommendations were submitted to the Council as part of the last agenda package that outlined the revised payment schedule. In addition to awarding the bond sale to the low bidder, the Council is also asked to approve entering into an agreement with Springsted, Inc., to provide continuing disclosure services and monitoring related to this bond issue. The Securities and Exchange Commission has created new regulations that require municipalities who issue bonds to provide annual disclosure statements on the financial health of the City along with other pertinent information bond holders use to determine market value of our securities. Our financial advisor is able to provide this information on behalf of the City to ensure that we comply with all regulations for an initial fee of $250 plus $200 for each additional bond that they monitor. It is recommended that our financial advisor be authorized to compile this information for the City on an annual basis. DECISION 1 • AWARDING OF BOND SAldi 1. Adopt a resolution awarding the sale of $1,575,000 G.O. bonds to the low bidder as recommended by Springsted, Inc. Do not award the sale. Council Agenda - 10/27/97 DECISION 2 - CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 1. Authorize entering into an agreement with Springsted, Inc., to provide continuing disclosure services to the City for the above -noted bond sale. Do not enter into a separate agreement. Because of the larger size of the improvement project for Klein Farms 4th Addition, it became necessary for the City to issue bonds rather than try to finance this project internally, even though it is anticipated to be a shorter - term assessment roll. If the developer builds out the project as quickly as he plans on, this bond sale provides for a call feature that will allow us to pay it off within three years. It is recommended that the bend sale be awarded to the low bidder as outlined by Springsted, Inc. In regard to the service agreement for continuing disclosure services, it is zlso recommended that Springsted be authorized to prepare this information on behalf of the City. The cost of providing these services can be included as part of the overall cost of issuance and will be added to the project cost being assessed. The likelihood of an error occurring that could hurt our credit rating would be lessened by having an outside advisor prepare the necessary disclosures. Copy of resolution; Copy of agreement for continuing disclosure services. (Bid tabulation will be provided Monday evening.) AS E. SEVENTH PLACE. SUITE IOD SAINT PAUL, .NN 53101.:10 b1:-1:1-1000 FAX, bI::17100: fz SPRINGSTED Pu6fu F,w Advuo.t AGREEMENT FOR CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AND/OR ARBITRAGE AND REBATE MONITORING THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the day of , 199_, by and between the City of Monticello, Minnesota, ("Client") and Sp6ngsted Incorporated ("Advisor'). WHEREAS, the Client wishes to retain the services of the Advisor on the terms and conditions set forth herein, and the Advisor wishes to provide such services: NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. .SSeNjceG, Advisor shall provide financial advisory services to the Client with respect to continuing disclosure and/or arbitrage rebate monitoring services as identified in the Addendum(s) attached hereto. 2. Comoensation. The Client shall compensate the Advisor in the amount of $250, payable upon execution of this Agreement, and at the rates set forth in Addendum(s) attached hereto for servi,.es to be provided by Advisor. The rates set out within the Addendum(s) shall be effective for twelve months from the effective date of each Addendum. Thereafter, the Advisors compensation can be adjusted to then current rates charged other similar clients upon sixty days written notice from Advisor to Client of the rate adjustment. 3. Term and Termination. This Agreement shall commence as of the date hereof, and shall continue until terminated by either party by written notice given at least thirty days before the effective date of such termination, provided that no such termination shall affect or terminate the rights and obligations of each of the parties hereto with respect to any project, whether or not complete, for which the Advisor has provided services prior to the date that such notice was given. 4. Indemnification: Sole Remedy. The Client and the Advisor each hereby agree to indemnity and hold the other harmless from and against any and all tosses, claims, damages, expenses, including without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, costs, liabilities, demands and cause of action (collectively referred to herein as "Damages") which the other may suffer or be subjected to as a consequence of any act, error or omission of the indemnifying party in connection with the performance or nonperformance of its obligations hereunder, less any payment for damages made to the indemnified party by a third party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no party hereto shall be liable to the other for Damages suffered by the other to the extent that those Damages are the consequence of: (a) events or conditions beyond the control of the indemnifying party, including without limitation changes in economic conditions; (b) "INT PAUL, MN MI NI APVUS, MN . URDOKRLLD.MI • 0VUU.A.ND PARK, IS - N'ASH NGTON, DC • 10WA Cm', IA O 5 actions of the indemnifying party which were reasonable based on facts and circumstances existing at the time and known to the indemnifying party at the time the service was provided; or (c) errors made by the indemnifying party due to its reliance on facts and materials provided to the indemnifying party by the indemnified party. Whenever the Client or the Advisor becomes aware of a claim with respect to which it may be entitled to indemnification hereunder, it shall promptly advise the other in writing of the nature of the claim. If the claim arises from a claim made against the indemnified party by a third party, the indemnifying party shall have the right, at its expense, to contest any such claim, to assume the defense thereof, to employ legal counsel in connection therewith, and to compromise or settle the same, provided that any compromise or settlement by the indemnifying party of such claim shall be deemed an admission of liability hereunder. The remedies set forth in this paragraph shall be the sole remedies available to either party against the other in connection with any Damages suffered by it. 5.1 Client Information. All information, files, records, memoranda and other data of the Client which the Client provides to the Advisor or which the Advisor becomes aware of in the performance of its duties hereunder ("Client Information") shall be deemed by the parties to be the property of the Client. The Advisor may disclose the Client Information to third parties in connection with the performance by it of its duties hereunder. 5.2 Advisor Information. The Client acknowledges that in connection with the performance by the Advisor of its duties hereunder, the Client may become aware of internal files, records, memoranda and other data, including without limitation computer programs of the Advisor ("Advisor Information"). The Client acknowledges that all Advisor Information, except reports prepared by the Advisor for the Client, is confidential and proprietary to the Advisor, and agrees that the Client will not, directly or indirectly, disclose the same or any part thereof to any person or entity except under the express written consent of the Advisor. Miscellaneous. 6.1 Delegation of Duties. The Advisor shall not delegate its duties hereunder to any third party without the express written consent of the Client. 6.2 No Third Party Beneficiary. No third party shall have any rights or remedies under this Agreement. 6.3 Entire Contract- Amendment. The Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior written or oral negotiations, understandings or agreements with respect hereto. This Agreement may be amended in whole or in part by mutual consent of the parties, and this Agreement shall not preclude the Client and the Advisor from entering into separate agreements for other projects. 6.4 (;overning Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Monticello, Minnesota. 6.5 aByerablllly. To the extent any provision of this Agreement shall be determined invalid or unenforceable, the invalid or unenforceable portion shall be deleted from this Agreement, and the validity and enforceability of the remainder shall be unaffected. .2. g.- �. 6.6 Notice. All notices required hereunder shag be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given when delivered, transmitted by first class, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: If to the Client: If to the Advisor, to: Springsted Incorporated 85 East Seventh Place Suite 100 St Paul, MN 55101.2143 Attention: Managing Principal The foregoing Agreement is hereby entered into on behalf of the respective parties by signature of the following persons each of whom is duly authorized to bind the parties indicated. FOR CLIENT SPRINGSTED Incorporated Title Gerard B. Shannon Vice President ADDENDUM A OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN v the City of Monticello, Minnesota AND Springsted Incorporated Effective as of 199_. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE SERVICES $1,575,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1997A Client has or will execute a Continuing Disclosure Undertaking in accordance with SEC Rule 15c2 -12(b)(5), or any successor Rules, in connection with the issuance of each Client debt obligation listed above in which Client has agreed to provide continuing disclosure of certain financial information and operating data and timely notices of the occurrence of certain events. Capitalized terms not defined in this Addendum or the Agreement shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in SEC Rule 15c2 -12(b)(5). Client wishes to retain the services of the Advisor to assist with the obligations set forth in the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking and Advisor wishes to provide such services as set forth below. A. Compile an Annual Report according to the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (the "Undertaking') executed by Client pursuant to SEC Rule 15c2 -12(b)(5) for the Debt Obligation(s) listed above for submission by Client to all Nationally Recognized Municipal Securities Information Repositories (NRMSIR), the State Information Depository (SID), if one is designated, and to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB), if required, prior to the Annual Report Date as defined in the respective Undertaking for each Debt Obligation listed above. The Annual Report shall include: 1. An annual audited Financial Statement to be prepared by Client's accountants. 2. Updates of the operating and financial data included in the Official Statement, as outlined for continuing disclosure in the Undertaking incorporated in the OKcial Statement. B. Monitor through periodic requests for information relating to incidents of and assist in the disclosure of Significant Events listed in the Undertaking. These include: 1. Principal and interest payment delinquencies; 2. Non-payment related defaults; 3. Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; 4. Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; A-1 1 0 q 5. Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; 6. Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax-exempt status of the .� security; 7. Modifications to rights of security holders; 8. Bond calls; 9. Defeasances; 10. Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities; 11. Rating changes. C. Assist Client in the dissemination of the Annual Report and any Significant Events that must be reported to the various repositories. D. Advisor will fumish a notification of compliance with the Continuing Disclosure requirements within 30 days after submission of the Annual Report. Client agrees to provide the Advisor with accurate information with respect to compiling the Annual Report in a timely manner and to fully disclose to Advisor any Significant Events as they occur. For its services, as speed in I, above, Advisor shall be compensated in the amount of $200 annually for each Debt Obligation covered by the Addendum. An Annual Report must be filed for each covered Debt Obligation outstanding. In a reporting period in which Client does not issue debt which produces an Official Statement that can be used as the Annual Report for a particular type of covered Debt Obligation outstanding (i.e., general obligation, revenue, utility, housing, etc.), an additional fee of $1,300 per type of debt will be charged for preparation of the Annual Report required to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking for that type of covered Debt Obligation. Client shall be responsible for county auditor certification fees, if required, and any legal fees incurred regarding compliance or Interpretation of Significant Events or filing of the Annual Report. This Addendum shall continue for the term of each Debt Obligation or until such time as either Client or Advisor terminates it by not less than 30 days written notice to the other party. Advisor shall be relieved of all liability with respect to its obligations hereunder if any information required to be submitted to Advisor hereunder is not timely submitted to Advisor. In the event at Client's request Advisor performs services described in this Addendum reasonably understood by Advisor to be performed pursuant to the Addendum after signing by Advisor, but before signing by Client, such services shall be subject to the provisions of the Addendum as if the Addendum had been signed by both parties. Signed as of , 19_, the effective date of the Addendum FOR CLIENT SPRINGSTED Incorporated Title Gerard B. Shannon Vice President A•2 8 - v COQ: INUING DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS Following are the fundamental ideas of the Continuing Disclosure requirements set forth by the Securities Exchange Commission under SEC regulation 15(c)2-12. This material is not meant to be definitive set of instructions, but merely a helpful guide to understanding the topic. Background The Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 exempted most municipal securities from registration with and regulation by the Securities Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Antifraud provisions of those Acts are not exempted however, and the SEC is using those provisions to ensure there is full and accurate information available to the holders of municipal bonds. The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the "MSRB) was established in the 1970's and has set standards for "Offiaal Statements" and other disclosure documents to assist issuers and underwriters in the preparation of adequate disclosure documents. Effective January 1, 1990, the SEC promulgated Rule 15c2 -12(b)(5) ("the Rule") which requires underwriters of municipal securities to make a professional review of the Official Statement prepared for the offering before making a recommendation to an investor to purchase. The Rule thus requires issuers to prepare Official Statements and make them available to underwriters prior to soliciting bids and to provide a reasonable number of "final" Official Statements to investors. In 1995 the Rule was amended to also require issuers of municipal securities to continue to update the information in the final official statement throughout the life of the issue. The amended Rule makes it unlawful for an underwriter to participate in the primary offering of municipal securities unless, prior to submitting a bid or entering into a contract to purchase the securities, it has reasonably determined that the issuer or an obligated person has undertaken in writing (the "Undertaking"), for the benefit of the holders, to provide continuing disclosure information to specific repositories. The Rule is issue specific, meaning that each offering is viewed as a separate obligation of the issuer. There are some exceptions to these requirements. Exemptions From The Rule There are two exemptions that completely exempt an issue from any continuing disclosure requirements of the Rule: A. If the issue amount is less than $1,000,000. Breaking up an offering into multiple issues of the same class and purpose of less than $1 million is prohibited and the aggregate amount will be controlling. B. If the bonds are issued in minimum denominations of $100,000 and are sold in limited private placements or mature in less than nine months or are subject to optional tender to the issuer at least as frequently as nine months. There are two partial conditional exemptions that are also available: A. If an issue has a stated maturity of 18 months or less, the requirements for an annual report of financial information and operating data are not required. The issuer must still undertake in an agreement enforceable by the holders to provide timely notice of any occurrence of certain specified material events. © SPRINGSTED - 1 • April 19, 1996 g .� If each obligated person with respect to the issue has less than 510,000,000 of municipal securities outstanding, including the proposed issue, as to which it is an obligated person, the financial information and operating data requirements are generally limited to information which is customarily prepared by the obligated person and available to the public. Notice of any occurrence of certain specified material events is also required. The issuer must in the final official statement identity by name, address and telephone number from whom the information may be obtained, if not from the issuer itself. Obligated Persons An obligated person is any "person" who is committed by contract or other arrangement to support all or a portion of the debt payments. This could be an enterprise fund, another governmental unit, or a private party. The issuer may not necessarily be an obligated person, such as with a conduit financing for a 501(c)(3) corporation or an industrial development bond. Each obligated person is responsible for its obligations under the Rule. The final official statement will identity who is deemed a material obligated person. The issuer has some potential liability if the obligated person does not perform as pledged in the Undertaking. If there is a history of persistent and material breaches of undertakings, they may preclude underwriters tram being able to rely on the issuers Undertaking for a future issue, therefore precluding underwriters from purchasing the issue. This is an area of the new Rule that will be closely watched and hopefully clarified as examples of noncompliance unfold. Continuing Disclosure Commitment To facilitate compliance with the Rule, except for the exceptions listed above, each offering will require the issuer to undertake to provide continuing disclosure throughout the term of the issue. In order for the underwnter to be assured the issuer will comply with the Rule, the Notice of Sale (if a public sale) will include a statement of intent to undertake or a statement of exemption from the Rule. If the sale is negotiated the Purchase Agreement will contain the language. The preliminary and final official statements will describe the terms and details of the Undertaking. The issuer will furnish the purchaser a copy of the Undertaking at closing setting forth its details and terms, and that such Undertaking is a condition of closing. This Undertaking can be a separate document or can be incorporated into the resolution awarding the issue. If there have been past compliance failures, the official statement must specify each instance. There are two parts to the disclosure process. The first is the Annual Report, which includes updated financial and operating data with respect to the issuer or other obligated persons, provided at least annually, including audited financial statements prepared in accordance with a specified standard (GAAP etc.). Information provided in the final official statement that has been specifically deemed material must be updated annually. The Undertaking will specify a time each year by when the information will be provided. The Annual Report must be filed with each of the Nationally Recognized Municipal Securities Information Repositories ("NRMSIR"), of which there are currently six, and the State Depository, if there is one. "Significant Events" has been a concern of many issuers because of the uncertainty of interpretation as to materiality. The SEC has clanfied this by listing eleven material events ("Significant Events") which must be considered with every issue. 1. Pnncipal and interest payment delinquencies; 2. Non-payment related default!; 13 SPRINGSTED .2. April 18, 1996 3. Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; 4. Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; 5. Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; 6. Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax exempt status of the issue; 7. Modification of rights of bondholders; B. Bond Calls: 9. Defeasances; 10. Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the bonds: and 11. Rating changes. In addition, the failure of the issuer to provide the annual report disclosure information at the time specified is also an event requiring disclosure. Whenever the issuer obtains knowledge of the occurrence of a Significant Event, the issuer shall as soon as possible determine under applicable legal standards if such event would constitute material information for holders of the bonds. Items (6), (9) and (11) will always be deemed to be material. If the issuer determines that knowledge of the occurrence of a Significant Event would be material, notice must be provided to the MSRB and the State Depository, if any. Failure to Comply With the Undertaking The SEC has initiated the Rule under the anti -fraud provisions of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934. The emphasis on enforcing compliance falls on the underwriters who trade the securities, both in the primary market and the secondary market. If the underwriter cannot be assured that the issuer will comply in the future, based on historical experience, they may not bid on the new issue or buy or sell the issuer's secunties in the secondary market. A holder of a bond in the secondary market may find it difficult or costly to sell the security if no current information is available since the underwriter cannot assure the adequacy of the information necessary to recommend purchase of the security. The Undertaking specifies that the bondholders can sue for compliance, and possibly monetary damages. The rating agencies have also stated that failure to comply may cause the rating on the bonds to be dropped or lowered. H SPRINGSTED - 3 - April 16, 1996 �i AS E. SL%T','TII PLACL. SUITI: I(X) SAINTPAUL,SIN S3101 -214i 612.221.1000 FAX: 612.221. 1/102 SPRINGSTED Plubhc Fukwe Alnico.: $1,575,000 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1997A (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) AWARD: HARRIS TRUST & SAVINGS BANK And Associates SALE: October 27, 1997 Price $1,564,593.25 Moody's Rating: A3 Net Interest True Interest Coat Rate $249,334.88 4.3905% $1,559,986.75 $251.65700 4.4402% $1,565,865.00 $252,766.25 44471% $1,572,732.00 $254,049.25 44570% (Continued) %AIM PAlli., MN MINN[ AP01.t%. MN BROOM 1110. WI OST RLAND PARK, k% WASHINGTON. W OW 17171, 14 Interest Bidder Rates HARRIS TRUST & SAVINGS BANK 4.10% 2000 First Tennessee Bank, National Association 415% 2001 Josephthal, Lyon & Ross. Inc. 4.20% 2002 NBC Capital Markets Group, Inc. 4.25% 2003 Wachovia Bank of North 4.35% 2004 Carolina, N.A. PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED 4.10% 2000-2001 DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS 4.15% 2002 INCORPORATED 420% 2003 OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC 4.30% 2004 NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. 4.10% 2000 FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC 420% 2001 An operating division of 4.30% 2002 U S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. 440% 2003 450% 2004 DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED 4.25% 2000 435% 2001 445% 2002 455% 2003 a 460% 2004 Price $1,564,593.25 Moody's Rating: A3 Net Interest True Interest Coat Rate $249,334.88 4.3905% $1,559,986.75 $251.65700 4.4402% $1,565,865.00 $252,766.25 44471% $1,572,732.00 $254,049.25 44570% (Continued) %AIM PAlli., MN MINN[ AP01.t%. MN BROOM 1110. WI OST RLAND PARK, k% WASHINGTON. W OW 17171, 14 Net Interest True Interest Price Cost Rate $1.564,920.00 $253,711.25 4.4655°n $1,563.660.00 $253,796.25 4.4701% $1,563,864.75 $254,766.50 4.4860% $1,563,612.75 $255,018.50 4.4909% $1,561,612.50 $257,581.25 4.5401% $1,570,302 00 $259,360.50 4.5562% $1,561,835 50 $258.68950 4 5587% REOFFERING SCHEDULE OF THE PURCHASER Interest Bidder Rates DOUGHERTY SUMMIT SECURITIES LLC 4.10% 2000 Par 4.20% 2001 2001 4.30% 2002 420% 4.40% 2003 425% 4.50% 2004 JOHN G. KINNARD 8 COMPANY 4.10% 2000 INCORPORATED 4.20% 2001 440% 4.30% 2002 4.35% 2003 4.40% 2004 PIPER JAFFRAY INC. 4.10% 2000 4.20% 2001 4.30% 2002 4.40% 2003 4.50% 2004 SMITH BARNEY 4.10% 2000 CRONIN 8 COMPANY, INCORPORATED 4.20% 2001 4.30% 2002 4.40% 2003 4.50% 2004 MILLER, JOHNSON & KUEHN, INC. 4.15% 2000 UNITED BANKERS BANK 4.20% 2001 4.30% 2002 4.40% 2003 4.50% 2004 NIKE SECURITIES 4.35% 2000 4.45% 2001 4.50% 2002-2003 4.60% 2004 FIRST OF AMERICA SECURITIES 4.10% 2000 425% 2001 4.35% 2002 445% 2003 4.50% 2004 Net Interest True Interest Price Cost Rate $1.564,920.00 $253,711.25 4.4655°n $1,563.660.00 $253,796.25 4.4701% $1,563,864.75 $254,766.50 4.4860% $1,563,612.75 $255,018.50 4.4909% $1,561,612.50 $257,581.25 4.5401% $1,570,302 00 $259,360.50 4.5562% $1,561,835 50 $258.68950 4 5587% REOFFERING SCHEDULE OF THE PURCHASER An -Iq VAar ylew 410% 2000 Par 415% 2001 Par 420% 2002 425% 425% 2003 430% 435% 2004 440% BBI. 5 42% Average Maturity 3 62 Years Council Agenda - 10/27/97 i 7 i V, iTMR1 W • City Council is asked to consider authorizing completion of a Water Resource Management Plan. The cost to complete the plan is $40,000. Funds have not been budgeted for this project in the past; therefore, to complete the project now will require pulling from reserves. Unfortunately, this item was missed during the budget preparation process; therefore, to do the project in 1998 will require a cut somewhere else or transfer of reserve funds to cover the cost. The general purpose of the study is described well in the proposal submitted by WSB. Following are a few of the specific issues that will be addressed by the study. Completion of the storm water fee program analysis. As you may recall, the City recently adopted a storm water fee program, which is based on the cost per acre to develop trunk storm water systems. The cost per acre was arrived at after study of the developing portions of the city (south and southeast), which represents approximately 75% of the land area in Monticello. The City cannot charge for trunk storm sewer service for the 25% of the area not studied. This report will provide information needed to set the proper fee for the portion of the city not covered by existing storm water studies. This step was identified to the Industrial Development Committee as an action item for the City some months ago as a follow-up to the development of the trunk storm sewer fee program. Establishment of local water quality standards. The report will outline options for development of water quality standards. Due to the city's "out -state" location, we are held to a lessor standard for discharging storm water into natural water bodies. Should the City be developing standards that are equal or stricter than the standards required in metro communities? This is an important environmentl cost issue that should be addressed. The answer will have a direct effect on the site planning for the Hospital District and Mississippi Shores expansion. We need to know soon if we will he requiring treatment of storm water before it is discharged from the parking lots into the river. Council Agenda - 10/27/97 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize completion of all or a portion of the Water Resource Management Plan for the City of Monticello at a cost not to exceed $40,000. Under this alternative, work will begin on the plan. Funds necessary for completion of the plan will be drawn from reserves. 2. Motion to authorize completion of trunk storm sewer costs but table authorization to complete the full study pending the outcome of the budget process/discussions. If Council is concerned about the taking on the cost of completion of the entire project at this time, it could be scaled back to address the immediate information needs relating to development of trunk storm sewer costs for the 25% of the city that has not been analyzed. The decision on when to complete the balance of the study could be made in conjunction with the review of other big ticket items. C- STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the City Administrator that, at a minimum, the City Engineer should be directed to define the cost per acre to serve the unstudied area with trunk storm sewer facilities. This information is needed to justify charging the fee to this area and is an implementation step of the trunk storm sewer fee program. The balance of the Water Resource Management Study is important but could be delayed if warranted due to budget considerations. Due to the current growth rate of the city, it is probably prudent to go ahead with the study, which will provide us with information we need to properly protect and manage our water resources. Proposal from WSB & Associates V &Associa es, Inc. October 22. 1997 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 612-541-4800 FAX 541.1700 B.A. xlinduea.ir. P.E. Brn A. Weiss. P.E. P— R. Will -bring. P.E. Donald W. Sterna. P.E. Ronald B. Bnv, P.E. Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff City of Monticello P.O. Box 1 147 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Preparation of Water Resource Management Plan for the City of Monticello WSB Proposal No. 021.97 Dear Mayor, City Council, and Sta1T: Attached, please find a scope of services to prepare a Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan for the City of Monticello. Preparation of this plan will allow the City to develop and define approaches. positions, and design standards associated with a wide range of water resource management issues in the City. When completed, we would expect the City will have developed a clear consensus and standards relative to: • On-site storm water management requirements, pond design standards, wetland management standards, and design storms to be utilized for the construction of storm water management improvements; • Treatment requirements, developer standards, and approaches to financing storm water projects; • Classification of water bodies for intended use, wetland banking, wetland conservation act permitting, and utilization of on-site versus oft site ponding; • Design standards relative to protecting ground water quality; • Identification of water resource -related problems and corrective actions, and storm water maintenance planning; • City budgeting for future projects and programs, and the development of unified perspectives for city staff and council members regarding these issues. "file scope of services and specific tasks outlined within this management plan provides the background information and tools necessary to address the above-described issues, as well as a host of other water resource management issues outlined in the scope of services. If you have any questions concerning the scope of services, the tasks or the objectives of this planning process, please do not hesitate to contact me at 541.4800. Sincerely, lates, Inc. 7�z Peter R. Willcnbring, P.E. Vice President c: Brct Weiss, WSB & Associates, Inc � nrrr•+„w.��„u n:� Infrastructure Engineers Planners I QLAI. MINA INA IV NI ly DAN 1 n I P v Proposal to Prepare City of Monticello Water Resource Management Plan Prepared by: WSB & Associates, Inc. 350 Westwood Lake Office 811/ WajWaBoalevard Minneapolis, MN 551/6 AB 9-� City of Monticello Water Resource Management Plan 1. Scope of Services A Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan will be developed to meet the needs of the City of Monticello. This plan will meet the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 10313.235 and Minnesota Rules 8410. The work effort will result in a single, comprehensive water resource plan for the City of Monticello that will address the Citv's water resource needs, now and in the future. Specific Tasks/Services to be Provided The scope of services we intend to provide is outlined below: A. Project Management To provide the City of Monticello with positive assurance that the work effort associated with this project is clearly defined, staffed, budgeted and managed, a number of project management tasks are outlined below: A detailed work plan will be prepared and submitted to the City for review. 'this work plan will reflect conformance with completion date. At the onset of the project, a meeting will be held, during which time appropriate members of the consultant's project team will meet with the City staff to review the work plan. Future progress update meetings will also be scheduled with the staff at this time. Monthly project status reports will be prepared and submitted, along with monthly invoices. 'lite status report will describe the work completed in the past month, outline any issues of concern that should be addressed, and review the anticipated work to be completed in the upcoming month. Ory Df Atonriceao $l ora Resource Atanapewnu Plan 011.97 • Secdon I. Pape I AB 1—T 9-3 4. The number one priority for the project manager will be to maintain clear communication with the City Staff throughout all aspects of the project so v that the City's needs and desires can be thoroughly addressed. Deiiverobles: • Detailed work plan • Schedule of project update meetings • Commitment to project communication B. Data Collection This part of the work effort consists of gathering all relevant water resource -related infomiation for the City of Monticello, including the following: 1. Obtain Information from City Staff A meeting will be held with the City staff to obtain all pertinent in-house water resource information. The following data will he collected: a. Water resource related agreements between the City and outside parties. b. As -built drawings of the existing trunk storm water conveyance system. c. The City of Monticello Shortland Ordinance. d. F EMA's flood plain maps and any Letters of Map Amendments. e. The City's Comprehensive Plan. f Available Topography Mapping g. All previous reports prepared regarding storm water management or water quality issues. City of Afonticello Nater Resource AfaMerwewt Plan 011.97 • Seetlan / - Pare 1 AB 9-�f Z Obtain Information from Other Agencies v A letter and detailed check list requesting water resource information for the City will be sent to each of the following agencies: • Wright County • USGS • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Fish and Wildlife Service • Other organizations that may be applicable. This will be followed up with a telephone call to provide additional assurance that the agency representative completes a thorough search of their files for the requested information. 9. Conduct Informational Meeting Two public informational meetings have been incorporated into the scope of this proposal in order to receive input on water resource related issues which will be addressed as part of this planning process. 'Ihe City will send out whatever public notices are desired for these meetings. Other meetings may need to be held with the Chamber of Commerce, the Industrial Development Committee, the Planning Commission, the Council or others during the plan's preparation process. Because the work effort associated with these meetings cannot be defined, time associated with these activities will be billed as extra services. Clry of Alontkello Water Resoarce .tlasalewrat Plan 021.97 - Section I • Pape! AS g: S 4. Prepare Data Collection Memorandum .t A data collection memorandum will be prepared outlining the data sources which were contacted and the results of these contacts. A description of the information obtained will also be provided, along with an organized set of file folders, clearly labeled, containing the information collected which the City can utilize in the future as reference information. Deliverables: • Lin ofagencycontaca • Public input into planning process • Identificationofproblems • Water resource library C. Analysis and Interpretation of Water Resources Data The water resource data collected as part of the previous tasks will be analyzed. interpreted and summarized to provide the City with an indication of the present status and possible trends concerning water resources. Specific information to be included as part ofthis interpretation and analysis is described below for each of the water resource management concerns. 1. /lydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling a. Review hydrologic characteristics of each watershed under existing conditions to determine the critical event for each subwatershed. b. Make recommendations for new ponding areas ifappropriate. New storm water ponds will be sired for the critical I00 -year storm. C. Normal and 100 -year high water elevations will be calculated fir ponding areas and open channels. d. Existing wetlands and natural storage areas will he utilized for storm water storage where possible. C. Recommendations concerning proposed outlets and their invert elevations will he developed for the City's landlocked basins and lakes. City of.ltondrello r/ ater Mmourcr.ltanagement Plan 071.97 • Section I - Page 4 AB TT 9-� f. Recommendations will be made conceming the need for changes to the existing storm sewer system and the need for additional storm sewer construction where appropriate. Lateral storm sewer systems will be sized to accommodate a 10 -year stone. g. Surface water management criteria will be developed. h. Recommendations outlining solutions to prevent existing flood problems will be developed. i. A digital hydrologic soils classification map will be developed for the City. j. All areas within the City of Monticello will be modeled using a TR 20 - based hydro!ogic model (HYDROCAD). As part of this modeling effort. up to 100 watershed areas will be delineated and existing and proposed storm water retention and treatment facilities defined. A map will be provided showing subwatershed delineations throughout the City in conformance with the model. 1'eninent hydrologic information, including drainage area, time of concentration, curve number (based on land use and soil type), storage required and the stage -storage discharge relationship for each storage area will also be provided. Dully developed storm water runoff rates and flood elevations for the one and 100 -year return frequency critical duration event storms will be nm and summarized in this report. 'Phis modeling effort will incorporate all previous hydrologic studies, which were completed I'or the city. 2. Flood Plain Alanagement Delberables: • llr-dmcad model /or entire CIA, • Digital h pdroing c soils classilicarlon map • Digltal.subuatecshed map • Detailed hrdrologlc data for each subwarenhed A map showing delineated flood plain boundaries will be prepared based on existing available information. Cly af.11antkello Nato Retaurer Alanagement Plan 021.9 ) • Section l - Pole s �B �T 90V The location of flood -prone structures on the flood plain map will be identified. A discussion of past floods in the City and the damage associated with these events will be provided, along with other pertinent information related to flood plain management. It is anticipated that the city records will provide us with information concerning past flood events. Dellverables: • Digital map offloodQlain boundaries • Digital map ulentifptng flood prone structures • Discussion of past floods 3. Shoreland Management A map of DNR -protected and non -protected waters will be prepared. Available information on the NOH`W (Normal Ordinary High Water) for these waters will also be provided. A narrative discussion outlining DNR shoreland zoning requirements, the areas regulated by the adoption of shoreland zoning ordinances, and the impacts of these regulations on development in the City will be provided. Deliverables: • Digital map of D,VRproteeted waters and Nol/IV • Discussion of DNR shoreland ordinances and their Impact I. (Vater Quality The water quality component of the plan will include: a. A review and summary of the water quality within the City. b. Development of a future sampling program that provides an analysis of key water bodies within the City. C. Development of water quality policies in conformance with the requirements of the Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. C4 of.tlonticello H arer Reswree Hanatetwent Plan 011.07 • Section I - Page 6B 9�8' d. P-8 Water Quality Model or other acceptable model will be developed to �+ assist in: (1) Predicting surface water runoff pollutant loadings from areas within Monticello. (2) Analyzing treatment capabilities of existing and proposed retention basins. (3) Developing local recommendations relative to enhancing water quality management. e. Developa recommended water quality monitoring program thatwill allow for calibration of the P•P model. Upon completion of the model, a summary and interpretation of available information on water quality within the City will be available. Deliverables: • P -r model for all areas of the City • Wafer quality monitoring plan • Interpretation of PR modeling results • Discussion of water quallte In the City S. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Existing erosion and sedimentation control practices will he outlined in the narrative portion of this section. A map showing erosion and DelhKrahles: • Oir77al map of erosion control problem areas sedimentation problem areas will Recommended erosion control policies be prepared. 6. Welland Alanagement Plan Existing water bodies and wetlands will be classified to define their function for storm water treatment. City of ,1lontieello Water Resource AlanareaKw Platt 021.97 • Section I • Pare 7 AB 9-9 The classification will be based on a water bodies' public use capability, the wildlife and aesthetic values of the wetland, and the downstream benefits the water 14 body is providing in regard to treatment of storm water runoff. The proposed classification system will be developed and submitted to the City of Monticello for review and comment. Based on feedback, the classification system will he finalized. A Wetland Management Plan will he developed which will include the following: a. Wetland protection policies consistent with the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. b. Wetland inventory that includes: (1) Identification of the existing wetlands including predominant vegetation types. This effort is based on using NWI maps, aerial photos and soils classification mapping. Each wetland will be field -verified for existence of wetlands in those locations. Formal wetland edge delineations and surveying are not included. (2) Determination of approximate wetland functions. values and dominant vegetation. (3) Identifying the Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters. C. The Wetland Management Plan will be incorporated into the Water Resource Management Plan. d. A map identifying each wetland with a corresponding table containing the pertinent infomtation from the above items will be prepared. C. Identify potential areas of drained and/or filled wetlands within the City that can be considered for restoration and wetland banking. C4 of Afoatkello Wafer Rnaarce Afaeagetwent Plan 011.97 . Section f -Page of AB ?�__ Deliverables: • Wetland classification system Wetland policies • Field identification and classification of wetlands • Digital wetland map showing the results of field verificmion • Identification of potential Werland restoration sites 7. NPDES Permit Recommendations As part of the development of this Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan, objectives. policies and management actions will be formulated that will allow the City of Monticello to anticipate the future preparation of an NPDES application to the MPCA. Specifically, background inventory information on the existing storm sewer system will be provided in such a manner that would be consistent with an exhibit that would be required in an NPDES permit application. The plan will also outline the activities necessary, to comply with NPDES permit requirements, as well as the time frame and cost for these activities. Deliverables: • DiscussinnofNPDFSpermkrequirements • Policies complying with NPDES requirements D. Water Resource Inventory Based on the information gathered during the data collection, analysis and interpretive activities, a water resource inventory will be developed to provide background information and documentation regarding assumptions made in the development of the, City's Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. Land and water resource information will be developed for each of the following areas of interest: 1. Precipitation Probabilities 2. Geology and'l'opographic Infinrmation 3. Wetland Locations and Types 4, Hydrologic System Layout 5. Flood Problem Areas 6, Existing Flood Insurance Studies %. Water Quality Data Ciry of Alnnncello Water Resource Afanagemat Plan 011.97 • Section I -Page v AB T 941 v 8. Shoreland Ordinances 9. Surface Water/Ground Water Appropriations 10. Ground Water Resource Data 11. Soils Information 12. Land Use and Public Utility Services 13. Public Areas for Water Based Recreation and Access 14. Fish and Wild Life Habitat 15. Unique Features and Scenic Areas 16. Pollutant Source Locations DeQverables. • Digital Maps • Flood problem areas • Water Quality• Monitoring Sites Well Locations • Hydrologic Soils ClassWation • Land Use Pollutant Source Locations • Detailed breakdown ojinjormation used to develop the plan E. Establishment of Goals and Policies Goals and policies for the management ofwater resources in the City of Monticello will be developed to compliment County, regional and State goals and policies. Goals and policies will be developed for the following areas of water resource management: I . Water Quantity 2. Water Quality 3. Recreation. Fish and Wildlife 4. Enhancement of Public Participation Information and Education 5. Public Ditch Systems 6. Ground Water 7, Wetlands 8. Erosion F. Problems and Corrective Actions Clry of Atonticello O'ater Resource Atanajrment Plan 021.97 • Section I • Page 10 Delhmrahles: • Goals and policies providing direction to the City and Developers in managing water resources in the Ciry As part of this task, water resource management problems identified within the City of Monticello during the data collection process will be identified and corrective actions will be developed to address these problems. Problems and corrective actions will be identified for the following areas: I . Lake and stream water quality problems 2. Flooding or storm water rate control concerns within the City of Monticello 3. Flooding or storm water rate control concerns between the City of Monticello developers on water quality and and adjoining communities. 4. Impacts of water quantity or quality management practices on recreational opportunities. 5. Impacts of storm water quality on fish and wild life resources. 6. Impacts of soil erosion on water quality and water quantity. 7. General impact of land use practices and, in particular, land development and land alteration on water quality and quantity. 8. The adequacy of existing regulatory controls to manage or mitigate adverse impacts on public waters and wetlands. 9. The adequacy of programs to limit soil erosion and corresponding water quality degradation. 10. The adequacy of programs to maintain the tangible and intrinsic values of natural storage and retention systems. 11. The adequacy of programs to maintain water level control structures. 12. The adequacy of capital improvement programs to correct problems relating to water quality, water quality management, fish and wild life habitat, public waters and wetland management, and recreational opportunities. 13. Identification of potential problems which arc anticipated to occur within the next 20 years based on growth projections and planned urbanization. 11tis task includes the Delhrrables: development of water resource Comprekenalve Her of water resource management design standards to problemm , I,lst o corrective actions for each problem provide clear direction to ldentyled developers on water quality and • Water Resource Management Standards water quantity issues. for Deovtopers. 00- of,llanticello Water Resource ,1lanagemem Plmr 011.97 • Section I • Page I I AB V—�. 9-/3 G. Financial Considerations Implementation of the proposed regulatory controls, programs and improvements that are identified in this Plan will have a financial impact on the City of Monticello. To establish how significant this impact will be, a review of the means and ability of the City to fund these controls, programs and improvements is necessary. Alternative financing options available to the City of Monticello will also be explored. Delimrables: • Discussion of flnancial impact of Plan on the Cin,'s existing funding sources. • Discussion ofahernwivefinancing options H. Implementation Priorities/ Implementation Program The water resources studies, programs and capital improvements that have been identified either through the Goal and Policies section, or the Problems and Corrective Actions section will be identified within this portion of the Plan. These identified programs, studies and capital improvements will be prioritized and an estimated cost to complete each will be provided. This will give the City clear direction in implementing the Water Management Plan. Deliverables: • Prioritized listing of water resource studies, programs and capital Improvements to he completed • Estimated rosts to implement each program, stud), and capital improvement. L Amendment Procedures There will be a defined Process for amending the City's Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. Amendments will be defined as major or minor providing the City the ability to modify' the Plan as needed in the future. This section will also identify the date through which this Plan will he effective and by which time it must be reviewed and updated. Delkerahles: Definition of major and minor plan amendments. Amendment procedures J. Prepare Final ReportlProduct I. 17illecn (15) copies of the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan describing the results of the tasks outlined above will be provided, following Clp- of Monticello Water Resource Ataxgene t Plan 021.97 0 Section I -Page 11 17 JB approval of the plan by the City Council. Copies shall include mapPs of legible scale detailing the wetland inventory, major and minor subwatersheds, existing and proposed storm sewer facilities, and detention basins. Full size copies of all maps will also be provided. The outline of the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan will be as follows: a. Purpose. The local plan will have a section entitled "Purpose" which outlines the purposes of the water management programs. b. Water Resource -Related Agreements. Any appropriate water resource management -related agreements, which have been entered into by the local community, will be outlined. This includes joint powers agreements related to water management that the local community may be party to between itself and adjoining communities. or private parties. Available information concerning these agreements in general conformance with the content of joint powers agreements will be included. C. Executive Summary. The plan will have a section entitled "Executive Summary", which generally summarizes the content of the local plan. The format for this "Summar•" will be similar to the summan_• used in the City's comprehensive plan. d. Land and Water Resource Inventory. The plan will contain a composite land and water resource inventory containing all relevant water resource data. e. Establishment of Policies and Goals. The local plan will state specific goals and corresponding policies related to the purpose of this plan, be consistent with the policies and goals of other governing bodies within the City and address the relation of the local plan to the regional, state and federal goals and programs. f. Assessment of Problems. the plan will contain a summary assessment of existing and/or potential water resource -related problems, which affect the community. the problem assessment will be completed for only those areas within the corporate limits of the community. g. Corrective Actions. This plan will describe nonstructural, programmatic and/or stnictural solutions to the problems identified. It. Financial Considerations. This plan will contain an analysis of the financial impact of implementation of the proposed regulatory controls and programs. The analysis will include at a minimum the following items: Chy of ,ganacdla nater Reeaurce ,Management Plan 011.97 • Section t - Pape 13 AB T! (1) The estimated cost of adoption and enforcement of local controls and standards for the City. v (2) A discussion of local ability to fund adoption of an enforcement of local controls and standards, implementation of other speci fled programs, and capital improvements. Discussion to include: (a) Levy limit constraints: (b) Effect on other City funding needs: (c) Establishment of watershed management taxing districts: (d) Creation of storm water utilities: and (e) monetary impact against home or farmsteads in affected community. (3) A summary of grant funding that would likely be available to fund water management projects and programs. L Implementation Priorities. This plan will prioritize implementation components so as to make the best use of available local funding and prevent future water management problems from occurring to the maximum practical extent. j. Amendment Procedures. This plan will contain a section entitled "Amendments to Plan", which contains the year the plan shall extend to and establish the process by which amendments may he made. 2 Upon completion of the "Final Dratl Report" that has been approved by staff and council, the report will be forwarded to review agencies for comment and approval. Activities that are associated with respondingto comments that arc received once the plan has been sent out for review will be an extra to this scope of work. 3. All input and output data files will be provided on computer disks, as well as hard copy where appropriate, for hydrologic, hydraulic and water quality models. 4. Digital files ofall maps incorporated into the plan will he provided to the City in a form consistent with City's mapping software. Digital maps anticipated to be completed as part of this plan arc: CLy of ilonficello Nater Raonrcr ,Ilanajexwnf Plan 011.91 a Section 1 - Poje 14 • Watershed map • Wetland inventory map • Subwatershed delineation map • Water resource problem area map • Water quality monitoring sites location map • DNR water appropriations Permit location map • Hydrologic soils classification map • City of Monticello land use map • Pollutant source location map • Flood problem area map • Floodplain boundaries map • Erosion control problem areas map Clry of Altonikello Water Resource Alarasewrnt Plan 071.97 a SecNar 1- Page 15 AB 1"L'Z• 9-�7 City of Monticel,!o Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan Il. Project Sched 7 .ou ,ur.acal/xcro I I. ♦ rrar+c,Y.rAGrYCY/. s Ir'.rtaraaverr INMfNIOr/ 6 6r,/.tCYY.v/ol Garr um,pXrr! /. IrWlrrf.ND [10.It(/I�f IP/IGq a f ..w . ruvi.u�/rana Y ,rMtYLK. RQV I'wa1/litf IY/'LLY.Nt. /YlF IIOGIW A AYLVOYIMI ...W a IrL.0 n..0 Wdl I Coy of M.uk.11. Wdw R""fc. M -;l- Pr.. 031.97 . P,*JmScl.fd. • .4.cdm II • PW i AB 't't City of Monticello Water Resource Management Plan Opinion of Cost for Required Services ESTIMATED APPRO.WMATE HOURS BILLING RA rE E%TE,%S/ON A. PROJECT AIANAGEMENT PLM:R R. WILLENBRING 25 588.00 $2.00 TODD E IIUBMER 10 565.00 650 rASK TOTAL $1,930 B. DATA COLLECTION PETER R. WILLENBRING 12 $88.00 $1.056 TODD Ii. IIUBMER 24 565.00 51.560 TED WITKOWSKI 30 547.50 S1,42i rASK TOTAL 54.041 C -l. ANAL ISIS & INTERPRETATION DP WA TER RESOURCE DATA - AMEND.MENT PROCEDURES PETER R. WILLIiNBR1NG 60 $88.00 S5.280 Ilk M. WEOSS 40 588.00 53.520 �- TODD 17. IIUBMER 30 $65.00 51.950 MICIIAEL J. VAN GILDER 32 $65.00 52.080 CIIARI.I:S W. KOCIIMANN 24 $47,50 51.140 TIM IL CARTIIN1' 32 54.1.50 51.392 TLD W'ITKOW'SKI 40 547.50 51,900 ANDREA MOFFAIT 60 $58.00 $3.480 rASK rOT41. 520,741 J. PREPARK ELVAL REPORTJPRODUCT PI -1'I R R. WILLI'NBRINC 60 588.00 55.280 KIICIIAI I. J. VAN GILDER 20 565.00 $1,300 '[ODD 1'. IIIIIIMIA 40 565.00 52.600 11 D WII'KOWSKI 36 547.50 51,710 PRINTING 15 C0141 -S 550.00 IM TASK TOTAL 511,640 IMIA14rED PROJECT COTT S39.213 C4I 4f Al-lkr0o "are? R""Mf M.war-wo P141w 011.17 • Oplxlaw gJCou fot Rt"Lt/ Simco - Stetlew III • Peg* I AB 9-i9 Council Agenda - 10/27/97 10. Congideration of change_ n policy for sewer and water worker e_mergeney response time. (J.S.) When the City of Monticello hires individuals for the water or sewer collection system, it is our policy to request that they live within a 10 -mile drive distance to the city shop for emergencies occurring within the city of Monticello (as modified on 2/8/93). The city shop is located at 909 Golf Course Road, and all vehicles and safety equipment are stored at this site; and in most cases, some type of tools, vehicle, or safety equipment is needed to respond to an emergency. The original policy of a 10 -minute response time had been in effect with the hiring of Tony Strande in 1988, who never did complete his probationary in regard to this issue. (Mr. Strande sought employment elsewhere). The original policy was in effect with the hiring of Rich Cline in 1990, and Mr. Cline at that time lived out County Road 75, which was 12.4 miles from the city shop. Mr. Cline signed an agreement stating that he would move closer to the city prior to the end of his probationary period. Mr. Cline then moved to a residence in Big Lake, which was closer, and then to a residence above Ernie's Bait on East Broadway in Monticello. Mr. John Middendorf was hired in 1993, and he was informed that there was a requirement to respond to an emergency and he would need to live within 10 miles of the city shop. It has come to our attention that Mr. Cline has sold his business at Ernie's Bait on East Broadway and is in negotiation for the purchase of a house just southeast of Clearwater in Silver Creek Township on 140th Street. This ® property is 11.8 miles to the city shop, compared to the 12.4 miles from the house he originally resided in when he signed the agreement for employment with the city of Monticello. Under ideal conditions, driving the speed limit, it may not be possible for Mr. Cline to reach the city limits in 10 minutes, let alone the city shop, and it is also beyond the 10 -mile requirement. Consequently, we felt that the City Council should review this matter. There are several reasons for the 10-milo response requirement in the sewer and water department. Much like the fire department personnel, who answer emergencies and are required to live within 7 miles of the fire station the sewer and water workers also have to answer emergencies that could involve life safety issues for the residents of Monticello. Backup of city sewers and/or safeguarding the city's water supply do require quick responses from the workers. Currently, the paging system is used by the sewer and water union workers only during work hours. Since they are not on a paid standby or on-call basis, they turn off their pagers when they reach Council Agenda - 10/27/97 home or after hours unless otherwise directed. This year we had 14 call -outs for emergencies in the sewer and water department, one of those was the storm of July 1. Three of those emergencies involved the backup of the Chestnut Street lift station. When power failures occur at this lift station, it is necessary to obtain an emergency generator at the public works building and bring it down to the Chestnut Street lift station and begin pumping. Under ideal conditions, we have only about 45 minutes from the time of outage to when the lift station begins backing up into homes. Of the 14 emergency calls, Matt Theisen, who carries his pager with him all the time, responded to all 14 calls. John Middendorf responded to three calls, and Rich Cline responded to four calls. There were occasions when the union workers were called but were unable to come due to other circumstances. City staff is in the process of looking at the on-call basis for employees where we may, with Council approval, pay one person to he on call during off hours or weekends, whereby they would have to he available. The City Administrator, myself, and Water & Sewer Superintendent feel it is important to have a response time requirement. As the city grows, the emergencies will become more numerous, and consequences of not answering them properly could cause bigger problems. We need to make a determination as to whether the current policy of a 10 -mile driving distance to the city shop should be kept or changed to a 15 -mile drive distance. It would take an individual 15 minutes to drive from the proposed Cline residence in Silver Creek Township to the city shop under ideal conditions. After the response to the city shop, it takes another 10 to 15 minutes to respond to an emergency with city equipment. IV �►. \ IR 0 DI 1. The first alternative is to keep the current 10 -mile driving distance b policy to the city shop, as precedents have been set in the past with the hiring of other sewer and water workers, and this requirement is to serve the needs of the public. 2. The second alternative would be to modify the current policy from a 10 -mile drive distance to a 15 -mile distance to the city shop. This would include Rich Cline's new proposed residence. 3. The third alternative would be to increase the mile limit beyond 15 miles. 4. The fourth alternative would be to drop the mileage requirement. 14 Council Agenda - 10/27/97 I have discussed this issue with the Water & Sewer Superintendent, and he feels that we should keep the 10 -mile drive distance requirement to the city shop, as there are other issues that add to this. If it is in the middle of the night, the individual has to get up and get dressed. If it is in the winter, he has to start his car, thus adding time to the drive time, which can put the overall response time beyond what is necessary to report to some emergencies such as the Chestnut Street or Bridge Park lift stations, or a severe water main break. As Public Works Director, I tend to agree with Matt that we should keep the response time to a minimum and that we should encourage those emergency responders to live near the city of Monticello. One improvement that we previously mentioned was the possibility of having someone on pager call besides the Water & Sewer Superintendent and myself. This would require paying additional funds for those individuals carrying pagers during off duty hours but would improve our emergency response. Increasing to a 15 -mile requirement to the city shop may be costly sometime in the future. It is, therefore, the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Water & Sewer Superintendent that the City Council leave the policy as is, that is a 10 -mile drive distance to the city shop, and further to allow City staff to work out an agreement with the union for on- call or standby pay when carrying pagers during off duty hours. Copy of previous Council minutes dealing with the past issues regarding the 10 -mile drive distance response to the city shop. 14 Council Minutes - 5/26/88 1. Consideration of Appointment to Position of Water/Wastewater Collection System Operator. Public Works Director Simola reported that the City received 40 applications for the position of Water/Wastewater Collection System Operator. 8e went on to say that Tony Strande is recommended by staff for the position by virtue of his overall excellent experience in the field. In addition, Tony performed well for the City as a Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator prior to being laid off due to organizational change. Simola then reviewed a proposed employee agreement which requires that Tony Strande reside within 10 minutes of the city of Monticello. At the moment, Tony lives in Palmer, Minnesota. The employee agreement requires that Tony comply with the residency requirement within six months of his start date. The employee agreement also calls for Tony starting at 90 percent of union wage with an increase to 100 percent of union wage after successful completion of a probationary period. Finally, the employee agreement stipulates that Tony will receive credit for years worked with the City in calculating the accrual of vacation time. Council reviewed the qualifications of the other candidates with City staff and discussed the terms of the proposed employment agreement. After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair to approve the appointment of Tony Strande to the position of Water/Wastewater Collection System Operator and to approve the employment agreement with the stipulation that there will be no extensions to the time line associated with the residency requirement contained in the employee agreement. Motion seconded by Bill Fair. Motion passed unanimously. /0.0/ v MIN Council Minutes - 12/12/88 5. Consideration of extending probation period/ res idencv requirement --Tony Strande. After discussion, motion by Fran Fair and seconded by Dan Blonigen to extend Tony Strande's probationary period by a period of six months and increase Strands's pay level to 1001 of the union contract pay scale at such time that Strands relocates to a residence within a 10-ninute response time to the city of Monticello. Motion passed unanimously. /0-�6. Council Minutes - 8/14/89 11. Consideration of additional extension to probationary period/residency requirement - Tony Strande. Administrator wolfsteller reported that Tony Strands has been unable to sell his home in Palmer and, therefore, unable to move to the community within the extended probationary period. wolfsteller recommended that the City extend the probationary period of Tony Strands for another six months or until he has relocated to the Monticello area and end the probationary period at the time that he relocates. wolfsteller went on to note that Tony is doing an excellent job and that he would by no means recommend at this time that Tony Strands be dismissed from hie position for not now meeting the residency requirement outlined in his employment agreement. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Fran Fair, to extend Tony Strands's probationary period for another six months or until he has relocated to the Monticello area and end the probationary period at the time that he relocates. Motion carried unanimously. /0003 Council Minutes - 2/26/90 8. Consideration of an additional extension to probationary period/ res idencv recruirement - Tonv Strande. After discussion, motion made by Fran Fair and seconded by Warren Smith to extend the existing employment agreement for a period of approximately three months. As of May 15, City staff is authorized to seek a replacement for the position in the event Strande is unable to comply with employment agreement. The extension of the agreement by the City is also contingent upon Strande's signature on the extension to the agreement. Voting in favor of the motion: Hlonigen, Fair, Smith, Haus. Opposed: Anderson. Council Minutes - 4/23/90 17. Consideration of hirinq a Water/Collection Svstems Operator to fill existing vacancv. Administrator Wolfsteller noted that Rich Cline, a current City employee, and an applicant from North Dakota are prime candidates for this position. At this time, the staff recommendation is to hire Rich Cline for the position; however, Wolfsteller noted that the applicant from North Dakota has excellent qualifications and appears to be more qualified for the position. At the same time, however, Rich Cline has done a good job for the City in his current position and will likely be able to achieve the same level of expertise as the other candidate with training and time on the job. In addition, Rich Cline is the candidate that the Water Superintendent has selected as his favorite candidate. Shirley Anderson noted that according to the Public Works Director, Rich Cline has been injured in the past on the job. Will the injury affect his ability to do the job? John Slmola reported that Rich is off restrictions and should be able to fulfill all job duties. Shirley Anderson asked if this job is easier than his job with the streets department. Simola stated that both positions require heavy lifting on occasions. Ken Maus noted that Rich Cline has not missed work for a long period of time, and he Is comfortable that Rich has overcome his physical problems. Ken Maus noted that the City should recognize the desire of individuals to transfer or move up from within the organization. Warren Smith was uncomfortable with hiring an individual that is not the best qualified for the position. He noted that maybe it makes sense to bring a better qualified person in from the outside. Dan Blonigen suggested that we transfer Rich Cline from his present position to the new position and advertise for Rich's old position. Fran Fair noted that Rich is a good employee, and his personality and skills are known and as such could make him just as qualified as the candidate from North Dakota. After discussion, a motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Fran Fair, to transfer Rich Cline to the position of Water/Wastowater Collection Systems Operator. Voting In favor: Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Ron Maus. Opposed: Shirley Anderson, Warren Smith. Warron Smith stated that he is opposed because he does not feel that we are hiring the best porson for the job given the information presented. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Warren Smith, to authorize advertisement for the position vacated in the transfer of Rich Cline to the position of Water/Wastowater Collections Systems Operator. Council Minutes - 9/9/91 5. Consideration of a request to amend the probationary period/ residence reouirement for Richard Cline. Rick Wolfsteller reported that Richard Cline was appointed to the Water System/Wastewater Collection System Operator position in 1990. As part of the job description, the individual in this position has to be able to respond to an emergency within a 10 -minute period of time after being notified. When Mr. Cline took the position, he signed an employment agreement stating he fully understands that his residence had to be within a 10 -minute response time from the city. He acknowledged that failure to live within this response time could result in termination of his employment. Wolfsteller went on to note that Cline was able to sell his home, and City staff assumed that Cline would be relocating to within an acceptable distance; however, Cline has indicated he is having difficulty in finding a suitable residence within his price range and has found a home that does not appear to easily meet the 10 -minute response time he had agreed to. Wolfsteller noted that under perfect traffic conditions from the home proposed by Cline, it appears that it would take 10-12 minutes to make it to Monticello. Council was asked to review the situation and determine if the response time meets the requirement or consider amending the response time requirement. Tim Connors of Local 49 was present. He noted that a 10 - minute response time is not necessarily a reasonable amount of time. Other cities that he works with do not have a 1O -minute response time. Most respond by beeper and have a 25 -minute response time. He also noted that in Monticello, employees are required to be within a 10 -minute response time area; however, they are not required to be on call. In other cities, employees are told to be on call and are paid accordingly. Dan Blonigon noted that the City should be establishing a response area and not time. Ken Maus noted that rather than change the requirement, he preferred to interpret the present situation as meeting the spirit of the 10 -minute requirement. Brad Fyle concurred. If Rich is within 10 miles, it basically meets the standard. Kon Maus noted that quick response depends on the employee. For instance, an employee could be five blocks away; however, he may still be slower to respond if he docs not take his position seriously. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and socondod by Dan Blonigon to agroe that Mr. Cline's proposed rosidonce northeast of Big Lake falls within the 10 -minute rosponse tin,o requirement. Motion carriod unanimously. I Council Minutes - 2/8/93 9. Consideration of a chanee in iob description for Water/Sewer Collection Operator and oohcv regarding response to an emergencv. John Simola reported that while reviewing the job description for the Water/Sewer Collection Operator, it was noted that the requirement of any experience in sewer collection was not included in the job description. Simola, therefore, requested that the job description be updated accordingly. Simola also noted that when the previous employee for this position was hired, it was suggested that the 10 -minute response time requirement be modified to include the requirement that the individual live within a 10 -mile radius of his reporting station, which is the public works office at 909 Golf Course Road. This formal policy has never been updated; therefore, Simola requested that Council consider doing so at this time. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Shirley Anderson to add the requirement of "experience in sanitary sewer/wastewater collection" to the job description for Water/Sewer Collection Operator and to change the existing policy requiring a 10 -minute response time to the requirement that the employee live within a 10 -mile driving distance of the office at 909 Golf Course Road. Motion carried unanimously. /0-,? EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT MATER SYSTEMS/WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATOR POSITION hereby acknowledge that I have rece(ved a copy - of the job description for the water System/Wastewater Collection System Operator and understand that the general requirement of this position with the City of Monticello is to be able to respond to emergency needs of the community in regards to the water and sewer systems and understand that as a condition of employment within this position for the City of Monticello that I must be able to respond to an emergency call within a 10 -minute period of time after being notified at my residence. Because the response time to an emergency is a bona fide condition of employment, I understand that 1) although residency within the corporate city limits is not a requirement, a condition of employment with the City requires the ability to respond to any emergency within the City within a 10 -minute period of time; 2) I understand that if I am not presently residing in the city or within an area within a 10 -minute response time, I agree to relocate my residency within a 12 -month period of time; 3) failure to do so will result in termination of my employment with the City of Monticello. Employee CIT F NNTICEL�LO Whn Simola, Public Works Director (2-W Rick Wolf "YO llor, City Administrator DATED: _+-130 / PRu jo - z Council Agenda - 10/27/97 11. Consideration of replacement of two Norwegian snow plows. (J.S.) A REFFRFNCF AND RA .K .ROUND: Several years ago when the H -Window Company was considering locating to Monticello, we purchased two Norwegian plows from a company that was also considering moving to our industrial park. The plows are pretty well worn out and are in need of replacement. These plows are used on our large single -axle dump trucks for clearing streets. In preparation for these purchases, we placed $10,000 in the 1998 budget. Due to the long delivery time of the snow plows, currently 90 days, we request that the City Council authorize us to purchase these plows as soon as possible. The Falls Model TER -12 Trip Edge Reversible Plows match the existing hitches on both trucks, and we have switched other trucks to this plow, which is similar in design to the Norwegian plow. The cost of each one of the plows is $5,415, for a total of $10,830. With sales tax, the total comes to $11,533.95. The Norwegian plows and the Falls Expressway plow have a trade-in value of only $900. We would like authorization to sell these plows on the open market, as we feel we can get more than the trade-in allowance to get closer to the $10,000 budget. R ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative is to authorize replacement of the two Norwegian plows with the Falls Model TER -12 Trip Edge Reversible Plows at a cost, including sales tax, of $11,533.95, from Little Falls Machine, Inc. of Little Falls, Minnesota. 2. The second alternative would be not to replace the Norwegian plows. C STAFF I F .O MFNDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Street Superintendent that the City Council authorize the purchase of the two new Falls reversible plows as outlined in alternative Nl. M CI IDDADTIK10 nnms• Copy of quotes on the Falls plow. 16 10-21-1997 10:20W FROM LITTLE FPL.LS rACHIrE INC. TO +m" high performance snow equipment since 1939 10121/97 Attn: Roger Marts Roger Mark 16122713272 P.01 •Food arets Snow Plows •power RsveniWe Srw •Plow. •snow, wine, stem . •Undartlusab scraps. searNMn •Tslfgiss Spwadas Having reviewed the specifications for the City of Monticello we recommend that. the following be considered: Falls Model TER -12 Trip Edge Reversible plow. Complete with all standard equipment. With plow unit to Po Fede 0408 hitch. With rubber beh deflector painted orange. Flow offset six Inches to the right Net price arch 83,113.00' Trade Norwoglan- STP ptowC t260.00 ea. Trade Falls Expressway plow f300.00 as., Tho above prices aro F06 Llttia - Falb. W. prices do not include hydraulic pumps and vaives roquirod for operation, plow ItInt4 applicable taxes, or freight. Tarin are nen thirty (30) days. Delivery to approxrma" 90 days after tecalpt of order. This quotation Is our Dost Interpretation of the desired equipment h to the dealers responalblllty to verify that this quotation matches the customers spechtaflons. Thank you for the opportunity to offer Falb Snow Removal Equipment We look forward to providing you the Meal in snow removal equipment and service. Yours truly, Chris Schulte vlce•Prosident UT1tE FALLS kttcwwl,,lwe • 900 Ls1Cl13tW+ DwF Soutw • LmLP FAu.e, MN 56345 (320)6612.9290 (900) 772 -PLOW FAX (320) 932-3494 an eausl opportunity employer PC I PACE) TOTAL P.Ol /D- D TV :371 1 1 ( - Sectional trip edge units for use at slov: to moderate operating speeds. I A Recommended for airports, highw< and city streets. For use on trucks wheel loaders Optional coatings available for moldboard face Three (3) torsion sp trip sections Standard c.:en,on valve 1 . ' thick end ribs ` X 1 G"'lar pivot ron W Double overlapping 7 gaugo and 10 gauge, formed bo. seeuons provide full length reinloreemfPnt t,.tiivr•I halt / H,,,rvy duty simplified o',CdldUnq A framo, a X .t' X '4' square tubing SLuvl,tr,l ..r' rm chrorno vanadium sr,a,r an7t', tor,,or �,pr,nq•i two (2) n , pro ::Pia en i Model Cutting width at 0e Cutting width at 351, left or right Overall moldboard height Moldboard reinforcement Moldboard thickness Cutting edges Trip mechanism Reversing cylinders Approximate weight, plow with push frame and hydraulics Screw adjustable shoes TER -10 TER -11 TER -12 10'0' 1110' 12'0' 87 910' 9110, 42' 42' 42' Two (2) double formed box sections 7 gauge, Grade A607 50 steel 10 gauge, Grade A607-50 steel Three (3), 5/8' X 6', AASFITO punched Torsion spring, two (2) per section Two (2) 3' bore X 24' stroke dbl acting 1700 poundsI 1800 pounds 1900 1900 pounds Stand. Stand. Stand. — options: carbide cutting edges, coatings for moldboard face, curb shoes, moldboard shoes, level lift assembly POWER REVERSE - Infinite adjustment from 0-35 degrees, loft The Falls Reversible Snow Plows are built to the same stan- or nght. Two heavy duty, double acting cylinders provWO smooth dards of quality and workmanship as me famous Falls One Way adjustment with the moldboard raised or lowered or while under and V -type Snow Plows. Durability and performance are syn. full load. The high pressure construction (8,000 psi min. burst In- onymous wilh the Falls brand equipment. Falls equipment is built able the cylinders to wnthstand normal plowing stresses. A cusR to withstand the use one abuse that owners of this typo of equlp- ion valve (standard equipment) protects the cylinders and the ment demand arta must have. hydraulic circuits from sudden impact or surge. YOUR DEALER IS: The policy and promita of Utile Falls Machine, Inc is conanumg proour.'1 monavemont Design UNnge and structural alterationa may occur w vw pnor notice Sucn Changes was nol sacrifice quality or product intognty, LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC. The home of the FALLS plows and the "FALLS" equipment line. *0+CU, 106 r �, w c:,:.y �r,w •:• rn.wr.. a ��. r,c, r•o,,,, .,, 305 Thrd SI 8 W Lmb Fops, MN 58345 Phano (0 t 2) W2,0" W !/-3 Council Agenda - 10/27/97 12. ConnMeration of purchase of snowplow for 4 -wheel drive Case loader. US.) - Last year and this year we budgeted a total of $11,000 to install an additional valve on the 936 Cat loader and purchase a quick hitch to install one of the existing plows on the loader. Due to la3t winters severe storms and the need for the loader during the cleanup this summer, we were unable to get the loader down to Ziegler to have the valve installed. With the addition of the new 4 -wheel drive Case loader, we have rethought the capabilities and uses for both pieces of equipment and would like to add an all -hydraulic plow and quick hitch to the new Case loader rather than to the 936 Cat. The Case loader already has the proper valving set up for it and, although it may be a smaller machine, with the right heavy duty all - hydraulic plow it could perform as well as the 936 for plowing purposes. In addition, the 936 Cat loader we feel could be used more efficiently as a loader for sand/salt and clearing with the bucket end or new large snow blower. 1. The first alternative is to authorize adding an all -hydraulic 94 plow and quick hitch to the Case loader at a cost of $4,483.65 including state sales tax. The second alternative is not to add a plow to the Case loader. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Street Superintendent that the City Council authorize the addition of an all - hydraulic plow to the Case loader at a cost of $4,483.65 including state sales tax. We feel this would be a very versatile piece of equipment for us in the winter time and would save $6,500 over the option of installing one of our used plows on the 936 Cat loader. Copy of information on the all -hydraulic 94 plow. THE NEW FISHER EZ -V PLOW LETS YOU _ MATCH THE POSITION OF YOUR BLADE TO THE WORK AT HAND IN THE SCOOP POSITION, THIS PLOW CRADLES AND CONTROLS THE SNOW IN CROWDED AREAS WHERE YOU CAN NOT CAST IT TO THE SIDE. IN THE "V" POSITION. THIS PLOW IS PERFECT FOR PUNCHING THRU TALL DRIFTS/ SNOWBANKS, TRAIL BREAKING, AND FOR OPENING UP PARKING LOTS. IN THE STRAIGHT POSITION. THIS PLOW WITH IT'S 8 1/2' WIDTH, IS GREAT FOR WINDROWING AND BACK DRAGGING. Fisher's state-of-the-art hydraulic power source called meta -act allows you to hydraulically lock the blade wings 10 act as one. Because the double acting 1 rdraulic cylinders are used to hold the wings firmly in 'cc, back dragging is easier. Combine this with Fisher's well known "trip edge" design and you have a plow that keeps snow out in front of it, is great for stacking and pil- ing, Is not trip- ping too often, needs virtually no maintenance, and is a real pleasure to own because it is so easy to operate! FISHER 81/2' EZ -V PLOW $ 3,840 installation avadablo POPULAR OPTIONS INCLUDE auxiliary cutting edges heavy rubber snofoil The Fisher "Fish Stix" is the newest innovation in snowplow controls. This state of the art electronic control is designed for tight or loft hand use, has an automatic shut-off, and can be unplugged for easy storage. Thera are two styles of the "Fish Stix" . The standard one features up, right, and left directional time limiters to reduce electrical draw, power "orf" ligril, five fool coiled cord and mounting bracket. The automatic float position you are used to is achieved by holding the down button. If the down button is pushed and then quickly released, the blade will lower itself in stages. The second rsion of the "Fish Sl,x" is used for the 1*/. -V IJ, ,%, and has all the same features as Einetandard "Fish Stix plus the addilion of n modo hutton to activate the scoop and unclrons. An additional kit is need if this control is to be used with EC/SV hydraulics 1A -A taeldelwrl01000u�ta_�u1111.��t'r �� �N.�.t:►� �r3t�rYall�l/rV�LI'�l�L'ti .r = 3 BP^ FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO .f 23/97 13:13:16 Schedule of Bills GL050S-VO4.30 COVERPAGE �l GL540R Report Selection: RUN GROUP... D1023 COMMENT... 10/:3 CKS DATA -JE -ID DATA COMMENT D-10231997-216 10/23 CKS Run Instructions: Jobq Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Linos CPI 1 01 Y S 6 066 10 �e BP^ cINANCIAL SYSTEM I � /97 13:13::2 Schedule of Bills VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT A M LEONARD TREE ROPE 211.25 SMALL TOOLS A EOUIPMENT 224.16102.2410 A.E. MICHAELS STREETS - SUPPLIES 23.99 EOUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2210 NATER - SUPPLIES 42.68 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 601.49440.2230 66.67 *VENDOR TOTAL ADVANCE SPECIALTIES CO AN SHELTER-MORTOR 479.25 BUILDINGS 101.12701.5201 AMCON BLOCK 6 PRECAST, I AN SHELTER -BLOCKS 11,968.04 BUILDINGS 101.42701.5201 AMERICAN PAGING OF NINNE JOHN M 6 RICH C 28.38 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 MATT 32.21 TELEPHONE 602.49490.3210 PATTY 146.91 TELEPHONE 101.42701.3210 JOHN S 14.19 TELEPHONE 101.43110.3210 GARY A 14.19 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 -1 L 14.19 TELEPHONE 101.45201.3210 D 14.10 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 RODER 14.19 TELEPHONE 101.43120.3210 218.48 -VENDOR TOTAL AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS AS PW MEMBERSHIP FEE 90.00 DUES, MEMBERSHIP 6 SUBSC 101.43110.4330 A1114AL CARE EOUIPMENT 6 AN SHELTER SUPPLIES 86.49 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.12701.3199 ARGON CONSTRUCTION CO IN 1 TRUNK 510" SEWER 200,129.57 PROF SRV CONSTRUCTION 453.40201.3025 ASSOCIATED VETERINARY CL AN SHELTER SUPPLIES 62.01 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.42701.3199 AUTUICJ INDUSTRIES SHOP OP SUPPLIES 55.24 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2190 OA.QTON SAND 6 GRAVEL CO. STREETS OP SUPPLIES 851.54 MISC OPERAIINO SUPPLIES 101.13120.2199 BASTIEN ERICK 8 STONE 510:41 CH CRICK POST 1,075.00 1907 STORM DAMAGE EXPENS 101.12501.1401 WATER CLOG REPAIR 650.00 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 6D 1.19440.2230 RM SIDEWALK M ORDWAY 500.00 1007 STORM DAMAGE EXPENS 101.12501.1101 ,..410 MASONIC LODGE 100.00 REPAIR 6 MIC MACH 6 EO 602,19490.1014 2,105.00 -VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF MONTICELLO GL54OR-VO4.30 PAGE 1 CLAIM INVOICE PO4 F/P ID LINE 216 00019 215 00015 216 0001E 58231 216 00020 216 00021 965594 HIGH SCHOOL a=I 216 00017 216 00030 216 00170 216 00031 216 00032 216 00033 8- FINANCIAL SYSTEM ,_ /91 13:13:22 Schedule of Bills VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR L1000R 204.00 LIOUOR 609.49750.2510 BRAUN IIITERTEC CORPORATI FARM - PROF SERVICES 1,439.88 BIOSOLIDS FARM IM,PROVEME 602.49480.4385 BRAY/MARY CEMETARY WORK 450.00 41SC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 651.49010.3199 BROCK WHITE COMPANY, LLC AN SHELTER -TRENCH DRAIN 683.95 BUILDINGS 101.42701.5201 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS, INC. STREETS -PLAINT MATERIAL 2,396.25 STREET MAINTENANCE MATER 101.43120.2210 BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANT SEWER PERMIT 2S.00 LICENSES 6 PERMITS 602.19190.1370 BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORA ELECTIONS-CODINO 609.45 PRINTED FORMS 6 PAPER 101.41410.2030 C,�_ tEE LAIN SERVICE LANK MAINT SEPT 559.13 PROF SRV - LAWN SERVICE 651.19010.310'. LACN KAINT - SEPT 159.75 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.42201.3199 LAWN PLAINT - SEPT 159.75 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC .111.45501.3190 LAWN PLAINT - SEPT 159.75 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 609.49754.3199 1.038.38 'VENDOR TOTAL �lC f LCL WWW--O►�tt►1'tifS�- — ec,,,, u �� ,w..., .�.....,:a,9 CEDAR 51. GARDEN CENTER PARAS POLY 16.04 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 10 1.15201.2250 CELLULAR 2000 OF SI CLOD TOM B 05.53 TELEPHONE 101_43115.3210 FIREHALL 0.61 TELEPHONE IO 1.12201.3210 GARY A 59.03 TELEPHONE 101.12101.3210 KATI 11.17 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES STREETS COJRIER CULLIGAN RENTAL D'G , TOOLS STGEETS T091S 157.:1 -VENDOR TOTAL 189.34 IUBRICANIS 6 ADDITIVES 101.13120.2130 26.51 RENTAL HOUSE EXPENSES 210.10:0 1.1381 31.50 SHALL TOOLS 6 EODIPMENI 101.43170..'110 CITY OF MONTICELLO G1510P.-VO4.30 PAGE 2 CLAIM INVOICE M: F/P ID LINE 216 00038 095737 216 000?9 JULY AUG SEPT 216 00040 838501 215 00041 215 00042 40226133 216 00043 558281 215 00041 CEMETARY 216 00048 FIREHAII 216 00045 LIBRARY 216 OOD16 LIQUOR 216 00047 mu 142070 OCIOCER 7851 IB :46-00048 C•III-1.11 216 00054 216 00055 216 O0056 8- FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF =4110ELLO ,, ./91 13:13:22 Schedule of Bills GL510R-VO4.30 PAGE 3 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POC F/P ID LINE DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING BEER 2.740.00 BEER 609.49750.2520 216 00057 NON AL BEER 177.80 RISC TAXABLE 609.19150.2510 216 00052- 00582,917.80 ,.917.80 *VENDOR TOTAL DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 377.40 BEER 509.49750.2520 215 00059 DICK WHOLESALE CO., INC. BEER 1,266.60 BEER 609.49750.2520 216 00060 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 117.51 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 609.49754.2140 216 00051 1,404.11 'VENDOR TOTAL OVERR'S NATER CARE SERVI SHOP - SALT 11.25 REPAIR 6 RTC - MACH 6 EO 101.43127.4011 216 00062 EHLERS 6 ASSOC,INC PUBIC EDA -PROF SERVICES 78.75 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 250.16501.3199 MC 100-01 216 00063 ELK RIVER BITUMINOUS INC ^EETS-OP SUPPLIES 392.72 M1SC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.13120.2199 216 00064 FAIR/WILLIAM PAYOR - EXPENSES 167.36 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.41110.3310 216 00055 FEDERAL EXPRESS REFUSE - FREIGHT 18.50 MISC REPAIR 6 MTC SUPPLI 101.43230.2299 215 OOC66 FEEORITE CONTROLS. INC. WATER 1/POTABLE 40.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 50 1.49440.3109 216 00067 WATER CHEMICALS 2,181.61 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 601.49110.2160 216 00060 2,835.61 -VENDOR TOTAL FLESCH'S PAPER SERVICES. L17JOR SACKS 66.01 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 609.19751.2110 216 OOC69 FLICKER'S T.V. 6 APPLIAN PW INSP SUPPLIES 3.12 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43115.2199 215 00070 0 6 h SERVICES ENV CHAME SALES TAX 140.11 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 10 L 8120.4)90 216 00000 RUGS 70.10 REPAIR 6 MIC GUILDIN03 101.41990.4010 OEP REG 216 00070 ,y UNIFORMS 80.0 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.15201.1110 JOHN L 216 00076 MI UNIF01S 52.80 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.11110.4110 JOHN S 216 00073 ` RUGS 11.16 REPAIR 6 MTC CUILDIN�S 609.49151.1010 LIWOR STO&E 216 00070 UNIFOOG 111.16 CNIF02M RENTAL 10 1.4)115.4170 PW INSP 216 00011 COONS 05.51 UNIFORM RENTAL 602.10490.1110 RICH, JOHN R 216 00071 .,,FORMS 141.61 UNIFORM RENTAL 601.19110.4170 RICH, MATT 216 C0072 UNIFORMS 60.10 MISC OPERATINJ SUPPLIES 101.13121.249 JHOP RA S 216 00077 B°^ FINANCIAL SYSTEM 4 497 13:13:22 Schedule of 81111 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND i ACCOUNT G I K SERVICES UNIFORMS 182.16 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.13120.1170 1,376.25 '1'EKOOR TOTAL GARTNER'S OFFICE PRODUCT CH - OFF SUPPLIES 161.23 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.11910.2199 BLIOG INSP-OFFICE SUPP 50.92 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.12101.2199 120.99R RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.11910.2199 CH - OFF SUPPLIES 11.85 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.11910.2199 MATER - OFF SUPPLIES 5.30 RISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 601.19110.2099 SEWER -OFFICE SUPPLIES 5.30 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 602.19190.2099 129.62 'VENDOR TOTAL GENERAL RENTAL CENTER WWTP-OP SUPPLIES 620.27 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 136.19201.2199 SHDP-OP SUPPLIES 101.50 RISC DPERATINO SUPPLIES 101.13127.2199 FARM - EXPENSES 235.77 BIDSOLIDS FARM IKPROYEME 602.19160.1385 MATER -OP SUPPLIES 15.06CR RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 601.19110.2199 PARKS -EQUIP RENTAL 178.66CR EQUIPIREIIT RENTAL 101.15201.1150 762.82 'VENDOR TOTAL G,_ A PRINTING, INC. BLDO INSP-PRINTED FORMS 132.00 PRINTED FORMS i PAPER 101.12101.2030 GLUNI/RAY HANSON, HOLLENBECK,GORDN 1,005.00 PROF SRV - EXCAVATION 651.19010.3115 GOLOEM VALLEY FURNITURE STORM CARPET, FIRE 1,100.75 1997 STORM DAMAGE EXPENS 101.12501.1101 GOULD BROS. CHEM -OLDS. C FIRE -73 CHEV 115.08 REPAIR I MTC - VEHICLES 101.12201.1050 GRANITE CITY REAOY-MIX, AN SHELTER -CONCRETE 2,151.77 BUILDINGS 101.12701.5201 GRAPHIC DESIGN IMSP PERMIT FORMS 250.00 PRINTED FORMS I PAPER 101,12101.2030 GRIOGS, COOPER I COMPANY FREIGHT 105.00 FREIGHT 609.19150.3310 LIQUOR 2,072.13 LIQUOR 109.11750.2510 WINE 2,851.80 NINE 600.19150.2530 NISC TAXABLE 127.11 RISC TAXABLE 109.19150.2510 j / 5.156.67 WENDOR TOTAL G`' 'AIN BEVERAGE INC. w.H 1.257.25 BEER 600.19760.2520 MISC TAXACLE 39.75 RISC TAXABLE 609.19750.2510 1.297.00 'VENDOR TOTAL CLAIM INVOICE STREETS ml CITY OF MOMTICELLO GLSIOR-Y01.30 PACE 1 POI F/P ID LINE 216 00075 $1938.51911 IiiH•1l1F1➢ 215 00067 216 00066 216 00069 216 00010 216 00011 0 P- FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO V J/97 13:13:22 Schedule of Bills GL540R-VO4.30 PAGE 5 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P ID LINE GROVE NURSERY CENTER PARKS -BUSHES 941.85 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 101.45201.2250 103205 216 00104 HARTNETT PARTNERING CONS MNTP-FACILITATOR SERVICE 2,099.14 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 436.49201.3199 216 00105 HENRY 6 ASSOCIATES MATER - APPLIES 328.08 UTILITY SYSTEM MICE SUPP 601.49440.2270 2994 216 00106 DATER - RESALE 77.72 METERS 6 VALVES FOR RESA 501.49440.2271 3013 216 00107 405.00 'VENDOR TOTAL HOGLUND UUS COMPANY STREETS-VEH REPAIR PARTS 26.26 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2211 321680, 332306 216 00108 HOGLUND COACH LINES LTD CONTRACT 5,160.28 PROF SVR - HEARTLAND BUS 510.49801.3060 SEPTEMBER 216 00109 HONE JUICE LIOUOR-MISC TAX 32.t2 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 85617 216 00110 J i SEEDING y�_ RM -S00 PMR POLES 800.00 1997 STORM DAMAGE EXPENS 101.42501.4401 216 00111 JIN MATCH SAID' CO STREETS -OP SUPPLIES 301.40 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 7943 216 00112 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L FREIGHT 33.75 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 215 00113 LIQUOR 939.73 LIQUOR 609.49150.2510 215 00114 MINE 1,656.35 MIME 509.49750.2530 215 00115 BEER 287.40 BEER 609.49750.2520 216 00115 2,917.23 SVENDOR TOTAL KEARIN/BILL WOODROW BROMN 55.00 PROF SRV - EXCAVATION 651.49010.3115 216 00119 KEN ANDERSON TRUCKING (26) ANIMALS 131.46 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.42701.3199 216 00118 KENNEDY 6 GRAVEN HRA GENERAL 366.46 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 213.45301.3040 17339, 18452 216 00120 TIF 1-22 26.80 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 213.45522.3040 17340 216 00121 393.26 $VENDOR TOTAL KLN ENGINEERING INC MMTP OP SUPPLIES 1,250.00 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 436.49201.1199 261,0211 216 00117 7 X bs.dER 6 ASSOCIATES, IN ASSESSING SERVICES 1,738.19 PROF SRV ASSESSING 101.41550.3t25 OCTOBER 216 00122 J'oC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO ,L /23/97 13:13:22 Schedule of Bills GL510R-V01.30 PAGE 6 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P 10 LINE L 'N' R SERVICES - LOCKS CN - LOCKS 16.00 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.1191D.2199 6910 216 00121 PARKS -LOCKS 399.73 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.15201.2199 6910 216 00125 AN SHELTER -LOCKS 96.56 BUILDINGS 101.42101.5201 6931 216 00123 515.31 'VENDOR TOTAL LASER SHARP, INC. DATA PROC - TONER 260.39 RISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.11920.2099 11166 216 00126 RETRO SALES INCORPORATED CITY HALL -FAX M/A 271.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 101.11910.3190 555511 216 00127 MILEY'S SPRINKLER SYSTEM PARKS -EQUIP REPAIR PRTS 161.60 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.15201.2210 6370. 6110 216 00120 MN NANRO JEFF - REGISTRATION 95.00 CONFERENCE i SCHOOLS 101.11301.3320 216 00129 MRA - REGISTRATION 360.00 CONFERENCE i SCHOOLS 213.16301.3120 215 00130 175.00 'VENDOR TOTAL ' "^NTICELLO ANIMAL CONTRO ,t ONTRACT 2,259.10 PROF SPY - ANIMAL CTRL 0 101.12101.3120 OCTOBER 216 00131 NONTICELLO/CITY OF CIGARETTE LICENSE 25.00 LICENSES i PERMITS 609.19151.1310 5799 216 00132 NATIONAL &WIND PARTS i SHOP - OP SUPPLIES 33.10 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.13127.2199 216 00133 FIRE - VEM R i M 92.05 REPAIR 6 RTC - VEHICLES 101.12201.1050 216 00131 FIRE - BLDG R 6 M 7.02 REPAIR 6 RTC - BUILDINGS 101.12201.1010 216 00135 STREETS - WEN REP PARTS 121.30 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.11120.2211 216 00135 151.27 *VENDOR TOTAL 1 OLSON, USSET 6 NEINGARDE BILLBOARDS 1,196.25 PROF SPY LEGAL FEES 101.11601.3060 215 00139 HNY 25 111.25 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 150.69201.3199 216 00110 CEMETARY DEED 29.75 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 651.19010.3199 216 00111 LEGAL - GENERAL 391.00 PROF SPY LEGAL FEES 101.11601,]010 216 00112 QUIET TITLE ACTION 3,161.95 LAND 210.19201.5101 60 216 00131 5,115.20 'VENODR TOTAL J OSI ENVIRONMENTAL SIREEIS PROF SERVICES $0.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.11120.3191 209215 216 00137 PAUL 6 CANDACE THIELEN NNIP REINS FOR TREES 100.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 115.19201.3111 216 00163 CLEANING SERVI CLEANING 110.00 PROF SPY - CUSTODIAL 101.11910.1110 CITY MALL 216 00114 --C FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO W /23/97 13:13:22 Schedule of Bills GL510R-04.30 PAGE 7 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND E ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P ID LINE PREUSSE'S CLEANING SERVI CLEANING 120.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 101.11990.3110 DEP REG 216 00115 CLEANING 150.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 101.13110.3110 PUBLIC WORKS 216 00116 730.00 'VENDOR TOTAL PRO AG CROP CONSULTANTS, SEWER - WWTP 1,075.00 BIOSGLIDS FARM IMPROVEME 602.19180.1385 216 00117 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OR WWTP 31,259.00 PROF SRV - PSG, INC 602.19180.3080 NOVEMBER 215 00113 PURCELL'S PLUMBERY WWTP - OP SUPPLIES 26.75 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 136.19201.2199 1063, 1115 216 00118 SCHLUENDER CONSTRUCTION STORM - DENO KLEIN FARMS 12,900.00 1997 STORM DAMAGE EXPENS 101.12501.1101 216 00119 SHOR-LINE AN SHELTER - SUPPLIES 2,255.00 BUILDINGS 101.12701.5201 111359 215 00150 "'IMAM/CATHY ,t_,ATHY - YR END TRAINING 26.68 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.11520.3310 216 00151 SIMPSON/CYNTNIA FIRE HALL CLEANING 50.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 101.12201.3110 216 00152 SUPERIOR SERVICES -CENTRA RECYCLING - AUGUST 3,111.20 PROF SRV - RECYCLING CON 101.13230.3101 250 216 00153 IDS TELECOM PARKS 106.99 TELEPHONE 101.15201.3210 216 00151 CITY HALL 1,161.91 IELEPHOYE 101.11301.3210 216 00155 FIRE DEPT 55.51 TELEPHONE 101 .42201.3210 216 00156 AN SHELTER 71.76 TELEPHONE 101.12701.3210 216 00157 AN SHELTER 70.22 TELEPHONE 601.19110.3210 216 00158 PUBLIC WORKS 130.79 TELEPHONE 101 .43110.3.110 216 00159 DED REO 177.19 TELEPHONE 101,11900.3210 216 00160 PW INSPECTION 10.20 TELEPHONE 101 .13115.3210 216 00151 LIQUOR 232.11 TELEPHONE 109.19751.3210 216 00162 2,611.01 'VENDOR TOTAL U.S. POSTMASTER POSTAGE•30 01 UB 183.15 POSTAGE 601.1944D.7220 215 00160 POSTAGE SEWAGE 3097 UB 183.15 POSTAGE 602.19190.7220 215 00169 316.00 'VENDOR TOTAL ' IINO CDCA COLA CITY HALL -POP 113.53 M1SC OTHER EXPENSE 101.11910.1380 2060156 216 00164 -*RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MON TICELLO /23/91 13:13:22 Schedule of Bills GLSAOR-V01.30 PAGE 8 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE P01 F/P ID LINE WRIGHT COUNTY TREAS/AUDI RICK - BOARD MEETING 25.00 RISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.41940.4399 216 00166 NSB 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. 1997 PATHWAY PROJECT 340.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.43110.3030 215 00001 WALNUT/ELM RR CROSSING 972.00 PROF SRV ENGINEERING F 101.43110.3030 215 00002 SHERMER PROP REVIEW 264.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.43110.3030 216 00003 CARDINAL HILLS 61H 305.24 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.43110.3030 216 00004 CARDINAL POND 132.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.43110.3030 21 D0005 80NUMUS EXPANSION 11.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.42401.3030 216 00006 MAPS 73.93 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.43110.3030 216 00007 RESURRECTION CHRUCH 249.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.43110.3030 216 00009 SR HIGH SCHOOL 1,115.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.43110.3030 216 00010 KLEIN FARMS 3RD PHASE ? 54,569.16 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 458.49201.3030 216 00012 25/CHELSEA RD 15,888.23 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 450.49201.3030 216 00013 TRUNK STORM SEWER-H.S. 200.129.57 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 453.49201.3025 216 00014 200.729.57CR PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 453.19201.3025 276 00171 FAY MAR 2ND 132.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 213.46517.3030 TIF 117 216 00011 PROF SERVICES 915.0D PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.4311D.3030 7-1 TO 1-31 116 00008 75,022.01 -VENDOR TOTAL GRAINGER INC WATER BLDG REPAIR SUPP 391.06 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 601.4940.22130 216 00165 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPOLIS CONTRACT 625.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.45111.3199 OCTOBER ?16 00161 —'C FINANCIAL SYSTEM ,A. /23/97 13:13:22 Schedule Df Bills VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT REPORT TOTALS: 110,279.32 RECORDS PRINTED - 000171 CITY OF NONTICELLO GL540R-VO4.30 PAGE 9 CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P ID LINE /'^C FINANCIAL SYSTEM `Z /:3/91 13:14:26 Schedule of Bills FUND RECAP: FUND DESCRIPTION OISBURSEKENTS 101 GENERAL FUND 63,209.02 211 LIBRARY FUND 159.75 213 HRA FUND 905.26 224 SHADE TREE FUND 217.25 240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING TO 3,1/8.49 250 EC0NOMMIC DEVELOPKEKT RUTH FD Te.75 435 93-11C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ 4,452.68 450 96-0IC HWY25/MNDOT INPR 16,322.18 453 97-07C HIGH SCHOOL TR ST SEN 200,729.57 458 97-04C KLEIN FARMS PHASE 2 54,519.86 601 NATER FLING 4,149.51 602 SEWER FUND 37,521.15 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 16,166.39 610 TRANSPORTATION FUND 5,150.28 551 RIVERSIDE CEMETERY 2,098.88 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 410,279.32 E BANK RECAP: BANK NAME -'•- -----------------•---------- DISBURSEMENTS CENL GENERAL CHECKING 393.412.93 LIOR LIOUOR CHECKING 16,198.39 TOTAL ALL BANKS 410,279.32 THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE NAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT. DATE ............ APPROVED BY ........................ L� CITY OF MONTICELLO GL060S-VO4.30 RECAPPAGE OL54OR CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL ITEM October 24, 1997 Enclosed with this agenda packet you will find a copy of the last draft of the City of Monticello Snow Plowing/Removal Policy. This represents significant change from our old policy and came about after the Street Superintendent and myself attended a policy seminar with about 25 other ©ties last year. The draft is presented so that you will have plenty of time to look it over in regard to what we do, whe a we do it, and the time frames with which we are to achieve those goals. The policy itself represents the minimum level of service. In many instances we hope to do better than this, especially with average or light snow falls. The snow policy will be presented as a specific agenda item on November 10, 1997, for the City's modification and/or adoption. At a meeting of the downtown businesses on the morning of October 15, it was requested that the City of Monticello make one pass with our snow blower down the sidewalk on the south side of Broadway in the commercial area between the Pump & Munch at Locust Street and Red's Mobil next to city hall. It was felt that since we were already driving from Point A to Point B on the street, why couldn't we just keep the snow blower on the sidewalk and make one path from those two points. In addition, it was suggested that the City step in on a regular basis or when the State cannot mobilize quick enough and clear the sidewalks along Highway 25 from River Street to 3rd Street, as when the snow gets deep it is very difficult for those property owners whose businesses are close to the sidewalks to keep it open. In most cases, it is necessary to haul the snow off site to provide a pathway. City staff will put together a cost estimate and time table for doing this additional snow removal and also talk to the Stats about stepping up their level of service, if possible, in this area. This information will be presented at the November 10 meeting, and it is my understanding that representatives from the downtown businesses will also attend. DR�f FORCOUN�IR��V CITY OF MONTICELLO SNOW PLOWING/REMOVAL POLICY MONTICELLO Introduction The City of Monticello assumes basic responsibility for the control of snow and ice on city streets and city owned public parking lots. Reasonable snow and ice control is necessary for routine travel and emergency services. The city will provide such control in a safe and cost effective manner, keeping in mind safety, budget, personnel and environmental concerns. The city will utilize city employees, city equipment and/or private contractors when necessary to provide this service. x. Arras of Responsibility Through its adoption, the City Council of Monticello is responsible for the policy established herein. Implementation of this policy is the responsibility of the Street Superintendent under the direction of the Public Works Director and City Administrator. The chain of command is the City Administrator, Public Works Director and Street Superintendent, in that order. Decisions as to time, method and materials used on snow plowing/removal operations will be made by the Street Superintendent under the direction of the Public Works Director and City Administrator, and any amendments are to be in accordance with amendment section of this policy 2.Amendments to Poliev Any amendments to this policy require council approval. Whenever possible and practical, amendments should be brought up at council meetings and should he a matter of public record However, to allow for emergencies or other extenuating circumstances, when time does not permit council approval or action, the Public Works Director is hereby authorized to amend any portion of this policy he sees fit. If practical, the City Administrator shall be notified and shall approve of any such amendment. Any such amendment made due to a particular emergency shall he brought to the attention of the council if the amendment is to be a permanent one The city shall acquire, maintain, repair and replace equipment on a timely basis as the city's established budget shall allow. To provide for utilization of equipment in a cost effective manner, the city may use regular city trucks, motor graders, front-end loaders, snow blowers and any other regular equipment as ntay be useful for control of snow and ice Gquipmcnt that can he used only for snow and ice control shall he acquired and utilized only if deemed absolutely essential Whenever existing snow removal heavy equipment is believed to he broken down for an excess ofeighi hours during a declared snow event and that piece of equipment is essential to snow plowing/ removal operations, the Street Superintendent may rent equipment The Public Works c�orrccr.mrc,ecs.urr,n Inez . PAGE t Director shall be notified ofthis decision immediately. A written report to include equipment down, reason for renting, estimated rental period, rental company, rental machine identification, rental rate, and estimate of total cost shall be submitted within 48 hours. v When the Street Superintendent determines that the policy levels of service cannot be provided by city forces, he shall report to the Public Works Director the following information: A. Additional time required to provide desired levels of service using just city forces. B. Additional equipment and/or personnel support required to achieve desired levels of service. C. Estimated number of hours equipment and/or personnel will be required. The Public Works Director will then take the following action: A. Determine availability of contractor equipment. B. Estimate cost of contracted service required. C. Determine availability of funds to meet estimated costs. D. Based on information supplied, the Public Works Director shall determine whether to contract for additional service or equipment, or accept reduced levels of service Ifcwrtracted service or equipment is secured, the Public Works Director shall provide the City Administrator with a report containing the following information: A. Purpose of contracting snow plowing/removal. B. Estimated time and cost ofcontracted services C. Time and date contract began In the absence of the Public Works Director, the Street Superintendent shall have full authority under this section and shall communicate any decisions or actions resulting in extraordinary expenditures to the City Administrator. S. Work SchMulC Scheduling of employees is the responsibility of the Street Superintendent under the jurisdiction ofthc Public Works Director When conditions allow, work schedules shall he arranged to keep overtime at a minimum, with overtime scheduling being approved by the Public Works Director. The Public Works Director shall notify the City Administrator of any unusual amount of overtime to be performed and the reasons c orciroocnaonaw.a mux -PAGE 2 6. Minimum Levels of Service The following are minimum levels of service that can be expected The city will strive Io achieve better results if possible. Snow and/or ice control may be terminated at any time the Street Superintendent or his designee determine that rising temperatures, visibility and/or the rate of accumulation make the control unsafe, ineffective or unnecessary. Should a subsequent storm occur within the minimum times for service, then such subsequent storm shall become the storm referred to in this policy. A. Snow removal and/or sanding operations shall begin when snow accumulation reaches two inches (2") or when ice or snow pack occur on designated orimary snow emeruencv, streets, and shall continue periodically throughout the duration of the storm. It is the intention of the City to keep these routes open to traffic, if possible, during a storm; however, it is not the intent to keep them snow or ice free. B. All designated secondary snow emergency streets shall be open to traffic (two lanes) within eight (8) hours after the snow storm subsides. C. All remaining non emergency through streets shall he open to traffic (two lanes) within twelve (12) hours after the snowstorm subsides Parking lot snow may be piled for removal and removed after snow is hauled from the Broadway median and all streets are widened curb to curb where possible. The snow plowing operations in the commuter parking lot shall be stared by 4 a m whenever weather conditions allow. D. All public streets such as dead ends and cul-de-sacs shall be open to traffic within sixteen (16) hours after a snowstorm subsides. E. Downtown Broadway, from Linn Street to Palm Street shall be plowed to the center median. The Street Superintendent or his designee may elect to plow downtown streets during evening or curly morning hours to avoid traffic and parked vehicles Oher downtown streets will be plowed outward City owned parking lots and alleys in blocks 34, 35 and 52 are generally plowed at the same time as non -emergency downtown streets. Refer to "C above I.. Do%vntown snow hauling including the half block of Walnut south of Broadway and funeral home on West Broadway, ifnecessary, shall begin the evening alter all streets have been plowed and the crews are rested I lauling shall not be conducted Friday evening or Saturday evening unless abnormal conditions warrant same G. Salt and sand operations shall provide bare pavement on driving lanes whcn sQn tipns nllow for all primary snow emergency routes, skid resistance at school crossings, stop signs and isolated icy ureas General snowpack on residential streets shall not he sanded If Snow depth at the comers of intersections shall he reduced to 36 inches or less following other necessary snow plowing and removal operations The Street PAGE 3 Superintendent or his designee shall have the authority to determine the scheduling and priority of this function. Certain county highways within the city are maintained by the city and fall under county maintenance agreements. Snow Emergency Routes The following streets are designated primary snow emergency routes: West CR 39 (Public Works Facility to West CR 75). Broadway Street (from Willow to CR 39 East). Walnut Street (West Broadway to 7th Street). Hart Boulevard (Ambulance Garage to Wastewater Treatment Plant to CR 75). Washington Street ( East Broadway to East 7th Street). 7th Street (Walnut Street to Washington Street). 6th Street (Fire Hall to TH 25) to include Fire Hall parking lot and drives. The following streets are designated secondary snow emergency rouics Elm Street (West CR 39 to West 6th Street). West 6th Street (Elm Street to Cedar Street). Cedar Street (River Street to 7th Street). 3rd Street ( Pinewood Entrance at CR 75 to Washington Street). School Boulevard (CR 117 to CR 1 18). Chelsea Road (CR 117 to CR 118). West Oakwood Drive (D & D Bus to TH 25). River Street (Ballftelds to Nursing Home entrance) Otter Creek Road (CR 75 to West River Street). A. Method of Plowine Snow Snow will be plowed in a manner so as to minimize traffic obstructions With the exception of that section of Broadway previously mentioned, the snow will be plowed from the center of the street outward. For narrow streets, the Street Superintendent or his designee may choose to plow from one side to the other. Snow shall be plowed and pushed from Icff to right and discharged on the edge of the street or on adjacent right-of-way without regard for sidewalks and/or driveways The City shall not be responsible for plowing snow from any private driveways or sidewalks 9. Ilonline of Snow Where space does not allow for snow to be pushed or piled outside the driving lanes, the city will remove the snow by hauling Timing of such hauling shall be at the discretion of the Street Superintendent or his designee 10, Weal herCondiNpM Snow and ice control operations will be conducted only when weather conditions do not endanger the safety of employers or equipment, and operations arc ell'ective I -actors that may delay PAGE 4. `d. snow and ice control operations include: severe cold, significant winds, limited visibility and rapid accumulation of snow and/or ice. 11. Disnatehin¢ of Enuinment Dispatching of equipment shall be determined by the Street Superintendent or his designee. The Street Superintendent or his designee shall monitor weather conditions and forecasts to aid in dispatch decisions. Plowing and/or sanding operations may occur during the assigned work shift or on a specific situation call out. If the specific situation is on a primary snow emergency route, the response shall be as soon as possible if workers and equipment are available and it is more than four hours until a work shift is to begin. Once a work shift has ended, the Street Superintendent or his designee has the discretion of responding immediately to other specific situations or waiting, in the case of non -emergencies, until a new work shift begins. For emergency vehicles responding to emergency situations (fire, medical, police) within the city, nexessary workers and equipment will be dispatched as soon as possible The Street Superintendent or his designee shall keep the Public Works Director informed of start, progress and end of full scale plowing operations. 12. Public Parking Lots Plowing started by 4 a.m.: Plowed by S a.m. on normal working days Commuter Parking Lot City Hall Parking Lot Hi -Way Liquor Parking Lot Deputy Registrar Parking Lot Plowed with orimary snow emergency route: Fire Hall Parking Lot Plowed within 12 hours after event: Public Library Parking Lot Senior Citizen Center Parking Lot 4th Street Park Parking Lot East BridgetWest Bridge Parking Lots Meadow Oak Park Parking Lot 13. Citv 1Aainlnined SidewglJLLI Public Works Shop Parking Lot Animal Shelter Parking Lot Block 34 (fay Zoo R AV Room) Block 35 (Behind Lock Jewelers) Block 52 (By Kjellberg's Carpet) Broadway from Pinewood Elementary - Pump & Munch Broadway from Palm St - Washington St City Hell Information Center Hillside Cemetery Elm - 39 - 75 Cardinal Hills Park Walnut Alley - 3rd St Minnesota a Old 7th St Old Senior Citizen Vacant Lot 3rd Street Flickers to Walnut Library Iii -Way Liquor Deputy Registrar/Parking Lot on 3rd Steps at River & Walnut Steps Hwy 25 K N New St Minnesota (NW 71h & Minnesota) Washington St (RR to 71h St) Old Max Discount Vacant Lot Sidewalks should be cleared within 24 hours of the end of a storm event as per City Ordinance cvr-- ... - PAGE a 14. Citv Maintained Pathways CR 75 Pathway from W River St to Pinewood Elementary CR 75 Pathway from Senior High School to Meadow Oak Ave School Boulevard Pathway from CR 117 to CR 118 The County Road 75 and School Boulevard Pathways shall be cleared to a minimum width of 6' within 36 hours of the end of any snow event with snow accumulation of or more on the pathway. Work shall not begin until the adjacent roadway is plowed and widened. Pathways shall be blown clear and/or broomed as necessary to provide a surface deemed safe for pedestrian traffic. It is expected that the bituminous surface shall be visible in many areas along the pathway. IS. Citv Maintained Skatine Rinks 4th Street Paris: West Brid6e Park: Two Hockey Rinks One General Skating Rink One General Skating Rink Within 24 hours of the end of arty snow event with an accumulation of more than I" of snow, all four rinks shall be plowed or blown clear and then broomed. All snow shall be removed from within the hockey rink area and no acc� mutations of snow should be left around the inside of the boards. Care should be used not to throw or pile snow on walkways. For any event between one-tenth of an inch to an inch of snow, all four rinks shall be broomed within 24 hours after the end of the snow event Again, accumulation or ridges of snow around the inside of the hockey boards must he removed. Only those mailboxes or other personal properties which are installed properly and allowed by city ordinance to be on the boulevard and pre damaued by rletual contact with city equipment, will be considered for compensation at city expense. Compensation for mailboxes and posts shall be for materials only. Damage to trees, shrubbery and other landscaping will not be considered for compensation unless located beyond the boulevard or private property The city will reseed plow disturbed areas of the boulevard in the summer months when staffing and workload permits Damage to personal vehicles will be considered only if they are legally parked and only if physically contacted by equipment. 17. Plowing of Private Property Unless there is direct benefit to city operations or unless emergency vehicles need access, there shall be no plowing of private property with city equipment IA. Review of Policy The city will keep on file comments and complaints received regarding this policy This policy will be reviewed periodically Any review will consider comments or complaints received since the last review. cn�rc�+oote.n.aa,10 wn,i • PACE 6 - 19. Winter Parkine RegU Rtions The Wright County Sheriff's Department will rigorously enforce the parking ordinances beginning November 15 through April 15, as follows: TITLE 9, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 2: PARKING AND STOPPING: It shall be unlawful for the owner and/or driver of a motor vehicle to stop, stand, or park the said vehicle in any of the following places, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a peace officer or traffic control devices: (K) On any street or roadway between the hours of two o'clock (2:00) a.m. and six o'clock (6:00) a.m. from November 15 through April 15, except physicians on emergency calls. TITLE 9, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 8: PARKING IN REGARD TO SNOW PLOWING AND/OR REMOVAL: After a snowfall, all streets in the city of Monticello shall be cleared of all motor vehicles and parts thereof for the purposes of snow plowing and/or removal until all streets are plowed. Any motor vehicle orf parts thereof left on any street or boulevard in the city of Monticello in such a way as to impede the performance of the city and/or state snowplow shall be dealt with under the Penalty Code No. 1-4-1. O cvrc�rou�rw,aw aou+ - PAGE 7.