City Council Agenda Packet 11-24-1997AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, November 24, 1897 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Bill Fair
Council Members: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held November 10, 1997.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
A. Add Item 5E to consent agenda to consider approving final payment to
RKI for Briar Oakes 2nd Addition and River Street sanitary sewer -
Projects 96.02C and 96-06C.
4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
5. Consent agenda.
1
A. Consideration of purchasing a 1.4 -acre lot from TDS Telecom, located
on West County Road 39 near the public works building.
B. Consideration of approval of change order q8 for Wastewater
Treatment Plant expansion - Project 93-14C.
C. Consideration of adopting a resolution adopting assessment roll for
Briar Oakes 2nd Addition - Project 96.02C.
D. Consideration of resolution accepting the Monticello Lions Club
request to adopt the Lions Club Pioneer Park (Klein Farms).
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion.
7. Public Hearing --Consideration of adopting a resolution adopting assessment
roll for high school storm sewer - Project 97.07C.
S. Considerntion of an appeal of denial of a variance to the rear yard setback.
Applicant, John Johnson.
9. Consideration of proposed zoning ordinance revisions implementing the goals
and objectives of the Downtown Revitalization Plan in downtown Monticello.
Applicant, City of Monticello.
10. Consideration of 9 -month liquor store report.
Agenda
Monticello City Council
November 24, 1997
Page 2
11. Presentation by Al Deruyter relating to proposed landfill expansion plans by
Superior Services.
12. Consideration of scheduling a meeting with Monticello Township to discuss
annexation issues.
13. Consideration of bills for the last half of November, 1997.
14. Adjournment.
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, November 17, 1897 - 5 p.m.
Members Present: Bill Fair, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce
Thielen
Members Absent: None
A special City Council meeting was held for the purpose of reviewing 1998 budget
revisions.
Based on direction from the first budget workshop, City Administrator Rick
Wolfsteller presented a revised budget which reduced the preliminary non -debt levy
increase from $329,348 (11%) to $99,549 (3.25'0. He noted that after receiving
additional information from Wright County, it appeared that the School District
was proposing a decrease in their tax capacity rate, which would help offset the
City's increase due to the wastewater treatment plant bond issue. Overall, it was
estimated that some residents could see a 516 to 6% increase in their 1998 taxes.
Wolfsteller then summarized the proposed changes in the 1998 budget. In order to
reduce the levy, it was proposed that $229,799 of the liquor store reserve be used;
however, rather than simply indicating that expenditures be paid by liquor store
funds, Wolfsteller recommended that the City transfer the liquor funds to various
debt service funds and reduce the debt levy by an equal amount rather than
reducing the nan-debt levy. This would allow the City to retain the ability to utilize
a higher levy limit next year, if needed.
In discussing the summary of changes for the 1998 budget, the Public Works
Director requested that Council consider purchasing the telephone company
property located on West County Road 39, which could be paid for with water access
fund reserves and would not affect the 1998 levy. The property consists of 1.25
acres and includes n pole burn which would be used for cold storage of water
department equipment. The price of the property was listed at $59,000, but TDS
has offered the property W the City at a price of $48,500.
It was the consensus of the City Council to authorize the Public Works Director to
place the purchase of the telephone company property on the consent agenda for the
next regular City Council meeting.
Mayor Fair noted his concern that if fund reserves were reduced too much, it may
lower the City's bond rating. In addition, non -budgeted projects may come up
during the year that the Council could complete using reserves.
Page I a
Special Council Minutes - l V17/97
Councilmember Herbst stated that the bond rating is also judged by existing debt
which, if increased too much, could also lower the City's bond rating. He suggested
that some projects be delayed such as the Hillside Cemetery fence.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to reduce the Hillside Cemetery
fence budget to $10,000 for 1998 and budget the remaining $19,000 in 1999.
Discussion then focused on the $164,799 amount budgeted for phase I architectural
design fees for the community center. It was noted that the cost would more than
likely be closer to $70,000, which could be taken from liquor store reserves and
deleted from the 1998 levy.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to reduce the proposed non -debt
levy increase by a total of $134,000, which would amount to a 6.5`b non -debt levy
increase for 1998.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Karen Doty
Office Manager
Page 2 02 A-
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, November 10, 1997 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Bill Fair
Council Members: Clint Herbst, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen
Absent: Brian Stumpf
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD OCTOBER 27, 1997, AS
WRITTEN. Motion carried unanimously.
A. John Simola requested an addition to the consent agenda to set the
minimum water bill at $7.50.
B. Jeff O'Neill requested an addition to the consent agenda to consider a
resolution for authorization to prepare plans and specifications for
construction of sanitary sewer and watermain for Resurrection
Lutheran and Methodist churches.
C. Bruce Thielen requested that Council discuss removal of the old
concession building in West Bridge Park at the end of the agenda.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO
ADD THE ABOVE ITEMS TO THE AGENDA. Approved unanimously.
4. Citizens commonts/petifionA. requPs s- and compl in s
None.
5. Cnn"nt avoncla.
5A. C,o aid rn.ion of approval of minimum water hill al 97.5 0,
Recommendation: Approve the minimum water bill bo set at $7.50
and not $10 as was stated in the agenda item for the October 13, 1997
meeting.
5B. Consideration of resolution authorizing preparation plans and
specification-, for co s niction of s nitary sewer and watermain for
Resurrection Lutheran and MpthndiFit churcheF; contingent upon
mit. Recommendation: Adopt a resolution authorizing
preparation of plans and specifications and authorization of
advertising for bids for the Resurrection Church and Methodist
Church sanitary sewer and watermain project pending submittal of
required deposit from the churches. SEE RESOLUTION 97-_
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS RECOMMENDED. Motion carried
unanimously.
Comideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion.
None.
o aid .ration of hirincradditional n r s worker-
John
ork r_John Simola explained the need for hiring one fulltime parks employee due
to growth in the city and the need to keep up with maintenance affecting
parks, cemetery, pathway, and related. This employee would be under
supervision of the Streets and Parks supervisor until such time as the parks
department is set up as a separate department. Future plana include a total
of two fulltime employees, one a supervisor and one a department employee.
Job description of the department employee would allow for primary
responsibility in parks but possible assistance in other departments.
Clint Herbst asked for explanation why a separate departmen is being
considered and the possible impact on union employees.
Bruce Thielen stated he would like to see job description first as parks
department needs are unique from streets and alleys.
Rich Carlson asked what starting salary would be. Rick Wolfsteller indicated
that it would be close to $12 an hour.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARISON TO
AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR THE POSITION OF A FULL-TIME PARKS WORKER,
WITH TH E ACTUAL RATIFICATION OF THE POSITION OCCURRING AT A LATER DATE.
Bruce Thielen asked that this be implemented with consideration of setting
up full department as soon as possible after January 1. Bill Fair requested
that completing development of Parks Comprehensive Plan be a primary
consideration when the new department is act up. Motion carried
unanimously.
Consideration of request for additional snow removal services on downtn_wn
ar a ci 1 w lks.
John Simola summarize the request of the Merchants' Association for
improved snow removal services in the downtown area particularly the
sidewalks along the south side of Broadway between Pump & Munch and
city hall and along Hwy 25 between the river and Third Street. Currently,
the city clears sidewalks on Broadway from Pinewood to High School with
the exception of above -noted area. It has been the responsibility of business
owners to do the clearing themselves within 24 hours of a snowfall. They feel
as long as the City is already snowblowing, they could do that area too. John
Simola discussed safety concerns with snowblowing because there are often
items such as newspapers, recycling bins, and such left on sidewalks.
Bruce Thielen commented that he had talked to several businesses and their
concern was more with the heavy snowfalls and not the occasional light snow
cover. Bill Fair thought there might be a possibility of hiring a private
contractor and having the city share the costs with the property owners.
Bruce Thielen and Clint Herbst agreed that the city only needs to make one
pass down sidewalks after heavier snowfalls and that would meet the request
of the business owners.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON
THAT THE CITY MAKE ONE PASS AFTER SNOWSI'OHAIS TO CLEAR SIDEWALKS FROM
PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY TO THE HIGH SCHOOL AND WORK WITH MNDOT TO
CLEAR SIDEWALKS ABUTTING HIGHWAY 25 FROM THE RIVER TO THIRD STREET.
Motion carried unanimously.
('ongidt,rafinn of adoption of new snow ployg/removal pn i v.
John Simola explained the history of the original snow removal policy
adopted by the city in 1975. John Simola and Roger Mack attended a snow
policy workshop in 1996 and have since drafted a new policy with the
assistance of Rick Wolfateller which includes minimum levels of service. The
new policy defines which streets, parking lots, parks and other public
properties would be cleared of snow. It clarifies what constitutes a snow
removal situation, what areas would be cleared when, and time frames for
clearing. John Simola also explained policies for sanding and salting and
priority areas for that service. The new policy includes the height of snow
banks at intersections being no more than 96". Weather conditions would
determine use of personnel and equipment. The policy includes winter
pathway maintenance, skating rink clearing, personal property damage, and
removal of illegally parked cars. John indicated that he will add downtown
area to sidewalk clearing policy.
Bill Fair mentioned that the approved policy could he included with the city
newsletter for all residents. He suggested also including a copy of the
proposed snowmobile route through the city.
Bill Fair asked for Council comments. Bruce Thielen commented that the
new policy is a great improvement because it spells things out and is much
clearer. Jeff O'Neill asked that the policy section regarding city ordinance on
no parking include emphasis on enforcement of snowmobiling restrictions on
pathways.
Bruce Thielen asked if the employee dedicated to pathway and rink
maintenance will have responsibilities for streets. Simola noted that this
person will be dedicated to pathways and rink maintenance and will not be
helping with streets except for very large snowfall events.
MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO
ADOPT THE PROPOSED POLICY WITH ADDITION OF DOWNTOWN SIDEWALKS AND
INCLUDING AN EMPHASIS ON NO SNOWMOBILING ON PATHWAYS. Motion carried
unanimouly.
10. Co aid ration of s 1 ine n architect for Phase I design_ of the Community
and Training Center.
Council was asked to consider adopting the recommendation of the
Community Task Force for architectural services, to appoint Ankeny Kell
Architects (AKA) as the architect, and authorize staff to prepare a contract
for service. O'Neill described the Task Force selection process and noted that
AKA was selected based largely on their past experience with similar
projects. Their fee would he negotiated based on the project cost.
Jeff O'Neill noted that, as expected, the National Guard has provided a letter
of intent committing $1.5 million for the project. Clint Herbst asked if the
National Guard will be asked to share in the design costs. He also wanted to
know what portion of the project will be put to referendum for approval by
the public. Bruce Thielen and Bill Fair, task force representatives, explained
that funding of site improvements continues to be researched. Bill Fair
pointed out the example of special sales tax requiring public approval. Clint
Herbst asked if the National Guard could be required to share in a certain
proportion of the costs for each phase. He is concerned that the city will
commit themselves to the project and then be liable for all of the accrued
costs if it doesn't go through.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO
ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMUNITY AND TRAINING CENTER
TASK FORCE AND DIRECT STAFF TO WORK WITH ANKENY KELL ON CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY, AND THAT CITY STAFF WORK WITH THE NATIONAL
GUARD TO SECURE COMMITMENT OF FUNDS ON A PRORATED BASIS FOR
COMPLETION OF DESIGN WORK. Motion carried unanimously.
It was noted that Council action on September 22, 1997 indicated Council
intent on completing the core city/national guard facility without going to
referendum. This commitment was necessary to gain the commitment from
the National Guard on their contribution to the project. Any added
amenities beyond the core facility, such as ice or water, could go to a vote.
Bruce Thielen expressed assurance that task force will be working hard on
garnering public input on funding, facility design, and desire for such a
facility.
Consideration of an appeal of a denial of a variance to the rear yard setba kk-
Apo i an , Inhn� Johnson.
Jeff O'Neill explained process that preceded the denial of the variance and
that it was denied based on no hardship shown. Appeal is being brought
forward because Marvin Road is not likely to be used as a public right-of-way
and variance would not be likely to impact future land use. Roger Carlson
asked how adjoining property may be used in future and whether there
would be any impact on zoning.
Jeff O'Neill explained that Planning Commission proposed that the building
be placed at an angle to match roadway rather than aligned parallel to
existing building as proposed by Johnson. Under Planning Commission
plan, building would not need variance.
Discussion ensued regarding whether Marvin Road would be used in future.
Glen Posusta questioned why city would want to improve that portion of the
road especially considering the upcoming Hwy 25 re -alignment and impact
on surrounding businesses. Jeff O'Neill noted that there may be adjoining
property owners who might want access to Marvin Road in the future. City
Engineer Bret Weiss suggested that city not assume Marvin Road will be
vacated because not all property owners have been notified of Hwy 25 plans.
Building Official Fred Patch noted that there may be some subtle changes
made to the plan that could accomodate .Johnson's needs without needing a
variance.
Bill Fair asked Johnson to comment what he sees as a hardship that would
require a variance. Johnson explained that he presented plans in the
summer and was not advised that there would be any difficulty in
accomodating plans. He has invested a large sum of money in engineering
fees and plans already. His partner, Fred LeBrun, noted that there could be
an impact in the proposed design of turning the building in that they may
have to adjust the garage doors and thus would not be able to move vehicles
in and out as easily or store as many vehicles.
MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN THAT
CITY STAFF MEET WITH JOHN JOHNSON IN ATTEMPT TO AVOID A NEED FOR A
VARIANCE AND TO TABLE THE APPEAL UNTIL NEXT COUNCIL MEETING ( WHICH IS
WITHIN 60-DAYTHRESHHOLDI. Motion carried unanimously.
Inc
... ... r a . a..
Jeff O'Neill explained that the Monticello Rotary Club is interested in
adopting the Prairie Creek Park and providing assistance in developing and
maintaining the park. Jeff O'Neill mentioned that the City will be
developing guidelines for signage for the park in conjunction with completion
of the comprehensive park plan.
MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT H ERBST AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE ROTARY CLUB'S REQUEST TO ADOPT THE
PRAIRIE CREEK PARK. Motion carried unanimously. Council questioned
whether the downed trees will be removed before winter. John Simola said
that it is being worked on right now but didn't know if it would be completed
this year. SEE RESOLUTION 97-
. . . . . .
..
o .. : :. n . •. .
...
Jeff O'Neill explained that City Planner Steve Grittman has prepared a
proposal for a new Orderly Annexation Agreement with the Township.
Primary purposes are to avoid Municipal Board meetings, to better reflect
city and township needs and concerns in regard to growth and development,
and create an incentive for township to agree to current petitions for
annexations. O'Neill defined areas of land that would be affected by the OAA
agreement. He noted that the original agreement between the City and
Township to establish the Orderly Annexation Area established areas for
future urbanization. City utilities and infrastructure has been built
accordingly. However, there is an opportunity for shifting boundaries to
reflect changes since the 1970s. Clint Herbst questioned why Tyler East
would be removed from OAA. Jeff O'Neill explained that areas to the west
and south will be added which is where the Township and City wanted to
emphasize growth. Under this proposal, annexation would occur based on a
petition by a landowner only. The City would not be allowed to unilaterally
request annexation without such n petition. For undeveloped land, the
township would continue to receive a portion of the taxes for 10 years after
the annexation.
Jeff O'Neill explained that the proposal establishes a process for assuring the
City that land in the city/township OAA is developed in a manner that is
consistent with the comprehensive plan. This would also bring us closer to
other OAA agreements used across the state. He stated that the agreement
would be in effect for 10 years and could be extended or dropped after that
time provided notice is given. If no notice is given, agreement shall
automatically be extended for 5 years.
Bill Fair expressed concern over annexation of existing non -vacant property
and allowing township to collect taxes over 10 years. He noted that it is
possible that the City may incur large expenses in cleanup or other costs
associated with existing sites such as the Monte Club or Kjellberg's Mobile
Home Park. He also had a concern over defining process of amending the
proposed agreement. Bill Fair asked if there could be a way to identify
probable land use in the OAA boundaries. Clint Herbst asked if it would be
possible to discuss this with the township board first before taking it further.
Bruce Thielen and Bill Fair expressed concern over difficulty of meeting in
such a large group and felt it might be more appropriate to have our attorney
discuss the agreement with their attorney.
Clint Herbst questioned the capacity of sewer lines for future development to
the southeast. City Engineer Bret Weiss explained how the interceptor lines
that will serve the southwest area could he adapted if needed to handle some
of the southeast area.
MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO
PASS A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PRESENT THE
ATTACHED PROPOSAL WITH AMENDMENTS TO THE MONTICELLO TOWNSHIP
130ARD IN AN EFFORT TO RESOLVE CURRENT AND FUTURE ANNEXATION DISPUTES
WITHOUT THE NECESSITY OF A HEARING BEFORE THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL
BOARD. THE AGREEMENT WILL BE AMENDED TO ALLOW THE CITY TO KEEP A
PORTION OF THE 10 -YEAR PRORATED TAXES FOR NON -VACANT, DEVELOPED
PROPERTY AND DEFINE, THE PROCESS FOR AMENDING AN ACCEPTED AGREEMENT.
Motion carried unanimously. Clint Herbst commented that he voted for
motion to bring discussion to township but he disagrees with the amount of
land proposed to be part of the OAA. SEE RESOLUTION 97-
: : r r W a r d ..r.� r• r: .i MIN r ar - r r
i M r r r • r r. • r r• t• r • r•
Jeff O'Neill discussed proposed Bridgeview Plat area and noted
environmental concerns identified in the Sherburne County Environmental
Assessment Review worksheet. The concerns relate to development of a
unique natural area and establishment of septic systems on poor soils. He
noted that a joint meeting will be held November 18 between Sherburne
County, Becker and Big Lake townships and Monticello city to discuss
development of land and preservation of woodland area. Jeff O'Neill
explained that at the meeting the Planning Commission will be striving to
establish a cooperative working relationship with the townships and county
in an effort to design a plat that meets the needs of the developer, townships,
and environment. Such cooperation could include joint powers and tax -
sharing agreements similar to agreements between the City of Big Lake and
Big Lake Township. He also noted that the Parks Commission supports
preservation of the wooded area for public enjoyment.
Barb Esse, Monticello Community Partners Chair, commented that this
would possibly be advantageous to future MCP plans to develop in
conjunction with the river setting.
MOTION WAS MADE BY ROGER CARLSON AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO
AUTHORIZE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO EXPLORE OPTIONS FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY, DEVELOPER
AND TOWNSHIPS WHICH WOULD ALLOW PRESERVATION AND PUBLIC ENJOYMENT
OF UNIQUE NATURAL AREAS AND ADOPT THE RESOLUTION SUPPORTING SUCH AN
AGREEMENT. Clint Herbst asked what the response has been from other
government entities. Jeff O'Neill noted that Rep. Mark Olson will moderate
the meeting. Also, earlier discussions with Gary Hammer, Becker Town
chair, regarding holding the meeting have been positive. Motion carried
unanimously.
14A. Consqdoration of removal of concession buil inu in West Bridge Park.
Bruce Thielen asked what is the status of removal of the old concession
building in West Bridge Park. He thought it was already approved and
wondered when it would be done. Bill Fair suggested that the City wait for
removal until after the Parks Comprehensive Plan is adopted.
lb. Consideration of WIN for the first half of November
MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO
APPROVE. THE BILLS FOR THE FIRST HALF OF NOVEMBER. Motion carried
unanimously.
OTHER
1. Discussed setting a date for budget hearing. Consensus was to hold it
Monday, November 17, 1997, at 5 p.m.
2. Bill Fair gave copy of a letter from Mr. Howard of NSP regarding concerns of
the Coalition of Utilities Cities about proposal to change tax base for utilities.
Rick Wolfsteller drafted letter responding to Mr. Howard on behalf of
coalition. After Council has a chance to review the correspondence, Rick's
will be sent to Mr. Howard.
3. Discussed letter sent to all councilmembers regarding commuter rail transit.
There will be a meeting at Maple Grove Community Center on this issue on
Wednesday, November 19, 1997.
4. 011ie Koropchak invited City Council to an open house at Lake Tool on
Tuesday, November 25, 1997, to show appreciation for opening their new
business in the city. She also mentioned RFPs will be going out regarding
development of Oudot A.
5. Bill Fair reminded councilmembers that there will be an open discussion for
Council prior to the second meeting of month.
6. Jeff O'Neill asked City Council if they wanted to interview Planning
Commission candidate prior to approval. Consensus was to put item on
consent agenda after Planning Commission interviews and selection without
a Council interview.
Meeting was adjourned at 10 p.m.
Catherine M. Shuman
Computer Support Analyst
Council Meeting - 11/24/97
A F.F .RRNCF. AND BACKGROUND:
Change Order No. 8 involves nine modifications to the wastewater treatment
plant project. One of the changes, CPR No. 31, is at no cost. The remaining
changes range in individual costs from $1,638 to $5,337. Total increase cost of
all nine change proposal requests (CPR's) is $25,643. There are no additional
days added to the project due to these changes. The following is a list of each
individual change, cost and the description:
CPR No. 18: Double modular wall seals with stainless steel bolts were added
for each pipe penetration through all tank walls in contact with wastewater and
sludge.
• Contract ADD- $4,072
CPR No. 23: The interior paint system for the secondary digester mixer was
changed to match the paint system specified in the earlier project completed by
Gridor Construction, Inc.
• Contract ADD: $8,337
CPR No. 31: For the motor control centers, the short circuit rating was
changed. Also, the classification for Room C-10 on the Influent Building was
changed to "Corrosive".
• No Change to Contract Price
CPR No. 381 A 6" overflow line was added from the grit washer, located in the
Headworks Building, to the influent channel to the sequencing batch reactors.
• Contract ADD: $2,321
CPR No. 44: Ceiling and stoop changes were made at the entrance to the
Admin. Bldg.
• Contract ADD: $1,984
CPR No. 80: This cost is in addition to the CPR No. 50 costa previously
approved in Change Order No. 'i. This cost includes the steel clip angles and
sealant to the interior masonry walls in the Headworks Building.
9 Contract ADD: $1A84
Council Meeting - 11/24/97
CPR No. 60R and FO No. 14: Aluminum railing modifications were made to
the handrail at the perimeter of the SBR tanks and inside the Headworks
Building.
0 Contract ADD. $2,834
CPR No, 62: A ductwork penetration was added between the lower level and
ground level in the Headworks Building.
• Contract ADD: $1,638
CPR No. 66: The motors that control the overhead doors were deleted for the
Sludge Processing Building and changed to explosion proof in the Headworks
Building. In addition, the selected color to match the exterior trim is an
additional cost.
• Contract ADD: $8,683
The approval of Change Order No. 8 at $25,643 brings the new contract price
with A & P to $11,382,670.50. The total value of all change orders to date are
$99,470 or less than 9/10 of 1% of the original contract amount.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTION :
1. The first alternative is to approve Change Order No. 8 to our contract
with Adolfson & Peterson in the amount of $25,643 as outlined above.
2. The second alternative is not to approve Change Order No. 8 as outlined
above.
C. STAFF F..O MFNDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator, Public Works Director, and
Project Engineer, Bob Poplin of HDR, that the City Council approve Change
Order No. 8 as outlined in alternative #1.
I
Copy of Change Order No. 8.
IV
flP
Change Order No.
IProject Name: Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
No.: 08124-004.164
IProjecl Owner: Cny of Monticello, MN
Project
s Project No.: 93.14C
ate of Issuance: 10110/97
roject Contractor. AdoMson and Peterson
ate of Contract: 1211a/96
rract
Period: 12/18096 - 10/1558
It Is agreed to modify the Contract referred to above as follows:
Item No. Item and Description of Changan
Contract Price Contract Time
Decrease Increase Decrease
Increase
1 CPR No. 18
0 $4,072 0 days
0 days
2 CPR No. 23
0 $5,337 0 days
0 days
3 C_PR No. 31
0 0 0 days
0 days
4 CPR No. 35R
0 52,321 0 days
0 days
5 EPR No. 44
0 $1,964 0 days
0 days
6 CPR No. 50
0 51,834 0 days
0 days
7 CPR No. 60R
0 $2,914 0 days
0 days
8 CPR No. 62
0 $1,838 0 days
0 days
9 CPR No. 66
0 S5,563 0 days
0 days
Sub -Total 0 $25,643 0 days
0 days
Difference Net $25.643 0 days
0 days
Summary: It Is agreed to modify the Contract referred
to above as follows:
Contract Price prior to thio Change Order
Contract Time prior to this Change Order
IS 11.357,027.50
Completion Date: Octobcr 15. 1998
Not Increase (decrease) of this Change Order
Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order
IS25.643
0
Revised Contract Price with all approved Change Orders
Revised Contract Time with all approved Change Orders
G 11,382,670.50
Completion Onto: Octoher 15. 1998
The changes Included In this Change Order are to be accomplished In accordance with the terms, stipulations and
conditions of the original Contract as though Included therein.
�l b"IQ%
A o t o r ctor by
Onto
Rocomm d d for reval By (HDR Engnoonng. Inc.)
Doto/
w
L
Approvod for Owner by:
Arrow Date
Distribution: L__tOwrwr UContractor flrco L___jFrotd UOthor
.To r- I
1, 41N III U:J t,Yuu.+l0w.n rw r.n Irl tp,]I1
r.,r . iwi nal i gir.,w r
Council Agenda - I V24/97
A REFFRENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City has recently completed construction of streets, sewer, water, along
with storm sewer improvements to the 32 -lot Briar Oakes 2nd Addition plat.
The developers agreement with the owner indicates that the developer is
responsible for all costs associated with this project. With December 1 being
the deadline for establishing assessments that can be collected on next years
taxes, the Council should adopt the assessment roll for this project.
The developers agreement originally required that the grading portion of the
project, estimated at $122,000, be paid upon completion of the work and that
the balance of the improvements for street, sewer, water, and storm sewer
would be assessed to the 32 lots. The City is paying $16,017.77 for
watermain oversizing and $7,840.58 for storm sewer associated with
collecting existing water from County Road 118. The balance of the
construction costs of $482,310.28 is proposed to be assessed against the 32
lots equally, which would amount to a $15,072.20 assessment per lot. To
date, the developer has not yet paid for the grading cost as originally
proposed in the developers agreement; and if we are unable to receive this
payment in advance, it is recommended we simply assess the individual lots
for the grading cost and increase the rate of interest we charge on the
assessment roll from 6.75% to 8.50% to cover our additional cost of carrying
the grading cost as an assessment. Hopefully, the developer will provide the
grading payment in advance of the assessment roll being submitted to the
county auditor, which would be in his interest to have the lower interest rate
charged on the balance.
The City continues to have a letter of credit covering 60^% of the assessment
balances, and adoption of this assessment roll is simply a formality for the
Council based on the developers agreement.
It_ ALTERNATIVE ACTION :
Adopt the assessment roll as prepared by the City Engineer for the 32
lots in Briar Oakes 2nd Addition.
Do not adopt the assessment roll.
It is recommended that the assessment roll be adopted as proposed so that
the amounts can be certified to the county auditor for collection on next
year's property taxes. Likewise, if the grading costs are not paid in advance
of the assessment roll being certified, the interest rata on the remaining
assessments should be 8.50%.
Copy of resolution.
z
Cow.cil Agenda - 1 V24/97
RESOLUTION 97 -
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROW.
FOR BRIAR OAKES 2ND ADDITION IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 96-02C
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met
and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of
street construction, trail construction, sanitary sewer and water main construction, storm
water drainage facility omstruclion and appurtenant work in Briar Oakes 2nd Addition
subdivision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the
lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be
benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied
against it.
Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first
Monday in Januaiy 1999, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.75 percent per
annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first
installment shrill he added interest on the entire, assessment from the date of this
resolution until December 31, 1998. To each subsequent installment when due shall
be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
The owner of any property so assessed may, at nny time prior to certification of the
assessment W the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property,
with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the
adoption of this resolution; rind he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city
treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest
accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment
must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the next succeeding year.
The City Administrator shall forthwith transmit n certified duplicnlo of this
assessment W the county nuditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the
county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as
other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 24th day of November, 1907.
Mayor
City Administrator ser
Council Agenda - 1V10/97
�1 1 ' -: 1 1 I 11 1: 4,ti- 1 1 1 1, I "IM, 1
Z7- 11 1 1
The Monticello Lions Club has been working with the Parks Commission on
a plan for development of the park area. The Parks Commission supports the
concept of having the Lions Club provide assistance in developing and
maintaining the park following a plan that is now under development. The
attached resolution provides formal support of the concept.
Motion to adopt the resolution accepting the Lions Club's request to
adopt the Lions Club Pioneer Park.
Motion to deny adoption of the resolution accepting the Lions Club's
request.
C. STAFF PrO MF.NDATION:
The City Administrator recommends approval of the resolution. it's great to
have a civic organization interested in helping develop the park. Itis our
sincere hope that staff, Parks Commission, and Lions Club members can
develop a plan for the park and signage in a timely manner so development
work can be started soon.
Copy of resolution.
RESOLUTION 97 -
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING
MONTICELLO LIONS CLUB PIONEER PARK
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is currently preparing a development plan for a
new community park located in the SW quadrant of School Boulevard and Fallon
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Monticello Lions Club for many years has donated labor and
resources to the improvement of several municipal parks; and
WHEREAS, the Monticello Lions Club is committed to continuing its support of the
city park system; and
WHEREAS, the Monticello Lions Club has reviewed the preliminary development
plan for the new community park at Fallon Avenue and School Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the Monticello Lions Club wishes to assist the City with labor and
other resources in the development of said park; and
WHEREAS, adopt -a -park signage design standards are under review in conjunction
with preparation of a comprehensive park plan which is scheduled for completion in
March 1998.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, in recognition of the Monticello
Lions Club's past, current, and future support of Monticello parks, the new
community park located at Fallon Avenue and School Boulevard shall henceforth be
known as the Monticello Lions Club Pioneer Park.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Monticello, the Monticello
Parks Commission, and the Monticello Lions Club shall work in cooperation in the
development and enhancement of the community park to be known as the
Monticello Lions Club Pioneer Park.
Adopted this day of 1997
Mayor
City Administrator
SO - /
Council Meeting - I (/24/97
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
A look ahead for the water department space requirements over the next few
years showed a need for additional storage space. The water department has
been using one and a half to two stalls of space in the pole building at the
wastewater treatment plant for several years. This space is now needed for
storage of operating supplies and spare parts for the new wastewater treatment
facility. In addition, numerous materials are stored outside at the city's storage
area near the leaf composting facility on West River Street near Montissippi
County Park. Also, additional office area is needed at the Office of Public Works
for desk and filing requirements. The Water Superintendent, Matt Theisen,
suggested that we look at the TDS property located across the street from the
public works building. This 1.4 acre lot has a 30' x 60' pole barn with a 12' foot
ceiling and concrete floor that is in reasonably good condition and would be an
ideal spot for cold storage of supplies and off-season equipment needed for the
water department.
Upon doing research of this property, I noted that the asking price was $59,000
and that a nearby property owner had expressed concern that Bridgewater
Telephone Co. may have buried some unwanted materials on the site years ago.
On Monday, November 17, 1 met with Tom 011ig and Ron Yaeger of TDS and
Dan Uoeman, who is the realtor representing TDS, to discuss the property.
The property is located just southwest of the public works building, across
County Road 39. It has it frontage of 231' on County Road 39 and is
approximately 264' deep. The westerly 165' of the property has been used by
Bridgewater'I'elephone/1'DS for decades, and an additional 66' on the cast side
was purchased later. Mr. Yaeger who observed the burial of materials on the
site indicated they were buried along the easterly property line and in the
southwest corner of the site and consisted of old steel and steel galvanized
telephone wire, along with miscellaneous pole brackets, a few broken unusable
sections of telephone poles and plywood reels for cable. It is my understanding
that no copper cable or the like was buried on the site due to its value for
recycling. TDS would sign it disclosure statement during the purchase process
that would outline the approximate location and type of materials buried on the
site. All of these materials appear to be out beyond tiny major building areas
and there is no indication that hazardous materials were buried.
Council Meeting - 11124/97
Discussions with Tom 011ig concerning the purchase price concluded with TDS
reducing the sale price (for the city only) from $59,000 to $48,500. Dan Goeman
also provided information that the property value based upon the city's assessor
was $49,800, with the value of the land being $39, 900 and $9,900 for the pole
building.
The property in question is zoned PZM which would be suitable in the future for
expansion of a public works facility or residential, commercial, or a combination
thereof. The property is fenced and it is my understanding that outside storage
is grandfathered in at this site as it has been continued for decades.
The first alternative is to authorize City staff to purchase the property
owned by TDS near the public works building, containing 1.4 acres, for
an amount of $48,500, using a portion of the $400,000+ balance in the
Water Access Improvement Fund.
The second alternative is not to purchase the property.
C. STAFF IZCOMMFNDATION:
It is the reeommendation of the City Administrator, Public Works Director and
Water Superintendent that the City Council authorize purchase of this property
as outlined in alternative q1. As Mr. Wolfsteller stated at our meeting on the
17th, it isn't often the city gets to buy needed property for less than our
assessor's value, and if the city should choose not to use it for expansion in the
future, the property should escalate in value. This not only fills our immediate
and possible future needs, but becomes a good investment for the city.
Copy of map showing property; Copy of tax statement showing value.
,1—
cj
r
! a
5
`o
LOT ' !
Of r
r ' A /
o
oul�il� A '°
'S:'
v� 4
i° .0 teas ,.iF„5� O w•
e � s0 1 GF-�'
.6 10 ° ,
F Ppp\
KAMPAjGik. • U*:g((E
c
4 • rl w os 1 w ! t LOT r
4 r- f 101100
101106
r
�iEFNn�
to 1•.ff,.. .rte ri ,�,- •, .r c, ., � �y S 2 j �' f `M
g,
• -
TELE. . 101405 r i
• x • EomPAN i (' �1�' • S��`t�rg 7
~ x i - ;101417i.:� V'j
101415 i fa a y
t 3 P •ra yV `9•�4aH � it , ` Q.
3 • las t., '101404
,to
4 of plot
, ..
00
jot
• 5 � r e a �a"� � 40J .�-
$
g c �a�.s. • 101408Swo
� R F 5 ., tap'°• �fD�a ,
0S 2
�Q1 ♦,. - ` ` - ♦40 of i N ��
r
'
WIL as
j 14 f p « yj �O Pia ` • ! ,r
'H Mr Q U t. 1• 0
p yl RRA• � °
M1 ly
WRIGHT COUNTY COMPLETE TAX REPORT
+-----------------------------------------------------------
!PID N : 155500101415 PROPERTY TYPE: COMMERCIAL - NON-PREFERENTIAL
YEAR 96
+- --------------------------------------------------------------
:PROPERTY INFORMATION
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
!ADDRESS ZIP:
;CITY
;CITY/TWN MONTICELLO
;SCHOOL DIST: MONTICELLO LOT
:PLAT NAME UNPLATTED LAND BLOCK
;LEGAL DESC : TH PRT OF E30A OF SE1/40F NEI/4COM AT NW COR AT
NW COR OF SD30A TR TH S2D30'W ALG W LN OF SD30 ;
A TR33FT TO S R/W LN OF CO RD FR POB TH CON ON
;ACRES
*------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
;OWNER/TAXPAYER INFORMATION
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
:OWNER NAME BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONE CO
;ADDRESS PO BOX 5091
MADISON WI 53717
!TAXPAYER BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONE CO
+----------------------+-----------------------------+-------------------------+
MARKET VALUESTAXES CREDIT
,
+______________________f__---_________--_---_-_____--+-_____-----------_-_ +
!LAND 39,900 BASE TAX 2.552.28 ! HMSTD/AGR1
;BLDG 9,900 TAX W/ASSMT 2.592.28 ! OTHER/CRED
;TOTAL 49,800
,
+- -------------------+-----------------------------+-----------------------
:H, .:STEAD : NON HOMESTEAD GREEN ACRES .
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------•--..._..+
!4nLES
t------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:1:l-f'FNT DATE PREVIOUS DATE
'RF'CFNT PR1CC PREVIOUS PRICE
!RECENT CODE PREVIOUS CODE
...._....._•--..-----•-----------..-----------------------------------------------
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED.
Council Agenda - 11/24/97
6E. Consideration of approving fi nal payment to RKI for Briar Oakes
2nd Addition and River Street sanitary sewer - Protects 9602C and
96-9. (B.W., R.W.) -
A. RFFFRFNCF AND BACKGROUND:
RKI has completed the work on the above -noted projects. The Briar Oakes
2nd Addition project included grading, street and utility construction for the
32 lots that constitute the project. The River Street sanitary sewer
reconstruction project involved replacing the existing clay trunk sewer with
new ductile iron pipe in an effort to reduce the inflow and infiltration in the
existing line. This was an effort to reduce and control the maximum flow. at
the existing wastewater treatment plant.
The original contract amount was $572,534.36. The total work completed
based upon certfied quantities of work is $567,109.80. The balance due the
contractor at this time is $126,178.68.
B. AL.TERNATNE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to authorize final payment to RKI in the
amount of $126,178.68 upon receipt of all final lien waivers, etc. for
the project.
2. The second alternative is not to make final payment to the contractor
at this time.
('. STAFF F .O MFNDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Engineer that the City Council make
final payment to RKI for the Briar Oakes 2nd Addition and River Street
sanitary sewer projects in the amount of $126,178.68 as outlined in
alternative t11.
II Q11DDnVIPIKlf] (IATA.
Copy of final payment document.
Nov -21-97 10:59A
P•04
-
BA Micdaadt. P.P.,
350 Westwood Lake Office
n— A wi . r.P.
8441 Wayzata Boulevard
['e.r w Willrnbri.l. P.F.
Minneapolis, MN 55426
U,..w a. +.n... P.r_
R—ld & Bar. P.r_
612-541.4800
&Associata, ler.
FAX 541-1700
November 20, 1997
Mr. Rick Wolfsteller
City of Monticello
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Briar Oakes 2nd Addition/River Street Trunk Sanitary Sewer
City of Monticello Project No. 96-02C & 96-06C
WSB Project No. 1023.00 tk 1023.20
Dear Mr. Wolfsteller:
Enclosed are three (3) copies of the Final Construction Pay Voucher No. 4 for the mfemnced project
in the amount of 5126,178.68. We recommend final payment subjeu to receipt of the following
items:
1) Satisfactory showing that the Contractor has compiled with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding State Income Tax and;
2) Evidence in the form of an Affidavit that all claims against the Contractor by reasons of the
contract have been Rdly paid or satisfactorily secured.
Please make payment in this amount to RKI, 12585 Rhode Island Avenue truth, Savage, MN
55378 at your earliest convenience.
Please give me o will at $41-4800 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
IKB A Asss1ociates, Inc.
�R
J-�- --
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
City Engineer
Enclosures
c: Tom Bou, City of Monticello
Ruehen Mausolf. RKI
Iv
5E- /
fnfrOrtr dm Eaglxernl Plaxons pop—,.—In
sQUAL ()M'()I IV Mr rY rMPU nU
Nov -21-97 10.59A
CONSTRUCTION PAY VOUCHER
ESTIMATE VOUCHER NUMBER: 4 (Br1ap
DATE
NOVEMBER 20. 1997
WSS PROJECT NUMBER: 1023.0011023.20
PERIOD ENDING:
NOVEMBER 20. 1997
PROJECT: BRIAR OAKES 2110 ADDITIONIFUVER STREET TRUNK SANITARY SEWER
CITY OF MONTICELLO PROJECT NO'S. 966020 964=
CONTRACTOR: FUC-RARD KNUTSON, INC
12583 RHODE ISLAND AVENUE SOUTH
SAVAGE, MN 55378
- --- _
CONTRACT DATE: JULY 19. 1988
WORK STARTED:
JULY, 1996
COMPLETION DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1880
WORK COMPLETED:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
6572.374.78
TOTAL ADDITIONS
95.663 75
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS
$000
TOTAL FUNDS ENCUMBERED
$678.198.11
TOTAL WORK CERTIFEEO TO DATE
$367,108.80
LESS RETAINED PERCENTAGE
obo%
$0.00
LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS
($440,871.12)
TOTAL PAYMENTS INCL. THIS VOUCHER
$307,109.80
BALANCE CARRIED FORWARD
$11.088.71
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER
LVA"
APPROVALS
P.05
In afCOrdanp vrM hold db.ervaypn, ds performed N KCerdanp wah vdustry sundards, AIW baeW on our prorulonAl opinion. the mAutuls insu0od
are sahsfaclony"the prod property performed in occords w with the palls And specthcabons. rhe WW work w estimated 10 be Igo % complaro0
as of November 20, 1807. We hereby recommend Payment of this vwd m.
Signed SIgnAO.
Construction ObservAr, Free" Manapm 'r1p.leu
RICHARD KNUTSON, INC.
This is to Partly that to the bat 01my knowl00go, Infon"bon, and belief, the puantara And va%M of work Cmefrod heroin H • tau •ppratlmato climate
for the paroo covered by this vouUwr
Contra=,
Data
CITY OF MON nCFLLO
Chockod by
mt.
Signed
This
Approved far Par nont
Authorized NApraantaWe
Dar
sfees J.
VOUCHER DETAIL LIST
PROJECT TITIL: SRI AR OA►I.G 2M ADDMON
PROJECT LOCA?RM: MOA THEM. IO. MINNF OTI
NS1 PROJECT NO.: IQLJAS DAM 11=177
YOI Y'HE1 N
A 41./iRt
Nre Jpr/. Cwmwrl Cwlnfl CRePIt17A 7'►6 Mnm► 7m41'R Disk
Nu fb. MH'r1P1w1a '..dy 11.11 11111Pnl7w1 pummlt Ual
1 •N1 r1 i1w1-1wc..'r NU 11 TREYf» Z. u at 10= DI S! no w
I 2 ;III Ir 2MI I1ri(AROIR' N rut u1e H.glr (wil Wal 2 )2 UI
1 aNlDI.I N Tau 'IV so 1llrr � V>ou 1 1, tlso
A -1lllw7 �L111HOfIl' i I �►(IF►t N TUI U/ m II.mL.M OR },{ - 7go
S •lu.J/l _'17•Trr�cvf/rlrac 17a 1A�vu f1f1 us.Nlm 110 I S27`` 212
► llm IOMVU�M)ilIIuA Y1 \' 11,se IA'rn 1r 1' L1!.1foro ..AGO _ I f61 Q1 42
7 AN
.. diAii!dl1' mR 1111r um IUMm � � � 100
i�s f►f a+i`n•1MSA SA1Pl11TA1v w II11r snm m.12Rm 0 � SU 00
-4a sol liblal. A Mu sill" 111.):! m tl7 _� S.,80
11 'Itis $23 �A411R ►LANRI l 11 YL HIUH M 01717 I M Lp 1"1) 11 r s17s! a p'YI sc� pp 0 M
�Tol 1cJlv�.it a Gdlr 1127 111 m I s21 J21 7A S I w 11, if
Nr f{ISM. L'w11M1 1'.Mrwrl I —F"d "I. M-16 int• I. Dwm
Ih Vw l�,� Qwwm HRH 1 R0 P7we 1 ulI ►.1a Qwgvi 1 oW Qlmslwl I ma
1 NM MI ewOVt c11Y �l411,W v 11A f T Ir N lime ((S1!po 1122 so
1 }Iw1„v { fiNl i►lI 1
so vu Dm 111: m ao
IN 111 0%,al ("Milt rivnui 41-11 omm 1 IN IT his �o
A Nlllu :y4� 1rtY1f1l1rr11kL�y6� % M ill #I n• a«a
1 11x.21 Wr{cI(AAMn6Q> R I 4m 6A $21
7I�17
► 111'(JI hv1 �r IYIYE �i 1rr
84f—, Y ,M u1
i2 MI � nw �f awAA floe lir rT i0 21
147 0# Nr di.►I il1N Ir Jf Vk 41 Wl V tw I Itt Mit MR* IIr to% iQ1�1f ' LIL►111 mRfl1 1II111�i1`\M1vii*1 1Ir 1D\II fill w l� 1� \ MI Ill Ai, NI R I'EMI � w{hnv I LJ (�IY�J h 111wq N4111s 4lll(Alk1It 2tr *VT f L(NYN - t _ r..
1A rA11111'UA1,11AT"MSKwuus.wnn Y4► 1r� N t2ju-irs � J� qval�
L1(4.�t8D'
i l�Z7W+ Imwlda.oltlAlvN 1li vvvwJD1lkJ r fl.rIti" I wpa «w..r i M I ....► . L I ti
C
Rh lPN. 1 oww n1 1 omrml ! .mPIrN I M M.wwl i.wl 1 I1.�.
N1. WmrI�I1yp1T� ltw.Ml! 1'e1 Ino ►I�te 1MR1 ►rkt QRRmr/ Iwo 1fwRR11 I.ml
MII M1 IUAfMf1A►1 sMlfiliA'i11V �1i Ni IY'111 lose v W.1
11]1 A11�a� 14Y`Mv1l:ll+iy�'i�r M /{yl,(yy`11 _}'11/it il%ma _
1 ,. 1w (/11,11, (4�1ri1>All W1 \I wll11.NN1N1 1(41 at) flf l/1,
1JIl\tl KI *,mvifil R 1.411
1 ltllnl Ci11 `LfI1�fUA'1 AA I�n Ih� 111r'i
W160 Ilalu IIt lea 1.111.01 "Will
i
it U'S 11
d 11 N\j�Ji��1.1`ANit inw7■ an
-fill A111110R\.1 f1-wwRnr2 �wn � I N f
VOVCHEH DETAIL LIST
PROJECT TITLE: BRIAR OA\TS 3.1140011 ION
PROJECT LO('ATION: MONTUVI IA. MINN&SOT4 BV: TI[(
MSR PROJECT NO.: I011.90 DATE! 1112919'
%Ot1(T1rR 04
O. %1..1—se
Ir■ Sp". Comwt Coetert 1 owe.1.N4 I%.. %loe11 TeYI T. Del.
la No eYry 1 W t'em frNe foul P»n Ows•niT. I«J l2suV7 Teal
1 r+tri Tet.(7W.21111AW, AOX11111i Ili 3410 tu. Ii ro4u 1, Olq Woo
2 »IIr1 IIIDIACI • 1%M StA.P 1, ,oenl o—'i )(IOU A 57100112
»Ilrl tYil A1111U�rnrna,w •u wery • kM'N swot sll.r f7 j0 (q 4)0
1 1.1(112 14vIiN1lY 141AYlt) n tM'N ►nu uu. >. M1
t 1111 rt •1.411 Lu s{AiU WI\ • IM7I tut 11 :r
e
Mi 6W 14AI[1M.1 .,Iii\ 1 !M'N u»w ►((o11:sew -- 4 If 1H no
T mlrl ua%n vAl.n •Nu toA • TMII WI .8 uwll 31 $1141a (111/l Il 1u v1
1 »I16" II lIVA sTU►i�'N V Hill U»I VNI fI Zn,
Oq 1 141
1.111.1 PNMC1 cd t 1!:, UNIT p11 1111P II O fOIal sft^l of
to All"I V#'4fWkA'1m-INtwnlj tn nIn t16r ,.1+ w 24 �toY
u lA1W HiATudli�lWifth4 b1 013401 Iln+ 11511Y� �W 1i !J}{190
11
13 1.111.1 1t4411111lkA*YdAfttlll I.+n KNIT W4 01w 18'�j r no 17%1 ((� 1234
p 1.016" :I�1tiOh6%k�lIlU�f^ r wto c111 (��6 $000
j( 1.u.1. I1Q1111mum NT}Rh 6.111 canto Put 101M.y�Qp 7s��
7aFAI xTDD�rt to (tel...ew 1t11 LA Al Tmi1 M 1 ftt.us 9.
r.", w
ee
11.. M•� - Cs~ C►e" ( ew►bW TV, 111-0 fewto M1.
No. Oro. oewA Iw w b Wt Iwt Mee TOW Mw Oe 7.101 NM�+f Trot
I W -01.l �'NCNn %wnt itP�l �Nllhk usl lw tl b so 00 d7QQp� sn 010
roltu IP1 "•t nnrnt N lNTT a+o+ carr ¢ jjyy 20 a1 iOa
7 Z":" IPt'u(IW►aA\ 3 TMM w14 i w 1 1141Do
J }}}}yyltn If/31twNMtN lMM a+n �y11 j) (1+100
% »u.+ I� Il IM► 434th I ►.�,1�fi[pe 4�a �Iha �en �i {{n
•1101 /1'1l'M►► (IMW l 2A111 dull
Ilk . T A'
l !!'1►11(x! ►11111Mn1111 NA u rA[TyN1e1 - ( E 1 14
1 11211.3 PLt11Y t140 ftaf A
hm k4. � PC, wa1 � �/�no00
1 ewfW i►UIYUVard1il71 IW9 AAli1% 3 t IIl1� �1 (�rV*
fa 6.(111 l IK�IY.r r�lla A (dn
I 14141 Il ri(�1�1..jjYl�li Ol "I.N Ors I1. If1 yi�F 1 :411 � � (�1
1 %11"IV m Adi-'= w l L I {� l
(� 11. cal 4sLkl��'� 1nVMYilllwiN.. t114 , a � d 1 YSY i � �"^v,7 Q I
jltn w .>,i111a.avdlMll It 1 caw 1311'1. ��,��1 o0
34111.1 '�6.u�111tY/PI'311Z1 ,1 Itfl. 1Mw pp��� �� N1� �
j- -
f RO)ECT 17Th: BRIAR 0AUS )N ADDI I DO%
PROM I LO('4I10N: NONTI(EI.LO. MItlV NOT A
N SR PROM T NO.: 1013.09
i Rn.. v.er(1�))ar7 freN7
Iww
NOe(.
N..
NO. Drxr1016oe
1
:101W 1ZsI IRA
2
yA�A�I�N4.AI
:111 Vl ,O(ALL OIA 1
�Z
l
:Iww :2V0v. stal m m11'/(.S—Aw�
Vrdt- Tae,
_TAR\I
11N bl .1. VII\"f tVIY MIL` Wl lF.
{
.,w wl . .qll elTL M,(K seA\f]0,T
p
11Y
7
:IY 1111 JIl VU\1 m Des IRIAN RR11141
R
:1Y ,11 .1\.1,4 e0.AVTV1p10114 MJNII
q
:Iw 111 .AL1AWY*,I
Ip
010, 11,1 1lu4Tfxlm.
11
0441101 INI,011T4Rll UAIYM111AT1RIAI n`\')
12
2No1111 i\1111.1(Alli,iYN1%NOW1
1)
1W,. Ivw 111:1 IIKRV &8OM
le
1.•161 111UVIw Ya M. IoMIK(tm I.M MAT
is
7161111 r'olflli 1016 OWWW14 i0 16
1e
10111/ ..\I.I W TIC M
1)
10111/ \1IMI IN AMR.
10
7,04.1. = Ilw. 16 VRI,
U
10
1111 Y.AA►/1110N R16RM t 1Ar IY
11RI11,161\0.
20
I.11GU1T1e OTVTIM YI7
21
woes: ,IVT SI wOAW UMn4Wle.'IR\IA wa.
22
^11.97 u,11("T NI T\1611NU lAMllurol.l■
�
•.1+041 1iu/Ilw•
jj
217:1 /16 .1Illln M.BUT,
1
n+lw `u11lIKr(IiYll�lAn
1R
7N1Ir atom
j)
l,ry M _edS& r4ff L`IM
jj DWIN ,RAT1, Awl A1-1149111.1.
A�At 111N1i11111 14... I..r11NAIT U.16.
G l OH., . 1
Dlw
1 166 Dw16pR..
1161111 luwwl./w 111
IIOT Lf(NfBlllc 1►0411. tNM. ICI
% ('HER DEl AIL LINT
B►: UK'
DATE: 11125►f
Vol 4MEN 44
(.elre.l
('D.Irrl
4—plrwd TTIY Mw1►
towel I. DMr
l2\YYewl
Ue11
Peu hx.
Tad h„c
V.u1}r
I.b1
Vrdt- Tae,
V
/RH
Iwu
►•wpb
P 9
10ro
S�. 12.Tpl IU
V
T,01
1:,16
117••10
1 .0
11100
SI Il,loO tO
0I
ln1T
uv
119uw
D A
faro
elf f2.illOta
r
I"A I
SI:
DID.
0 -0
su 00
TU 1270 DO
Ie0
.1pR
Col
wD16
U fi
191 11 SY: 011
1
I.NN
vow
11N.0
11 8
t00
ro
4 I 1M,O 11)
1
I.N
S,ww
SWO
0 it
1000
I ISIM 00
41
LIN IT
t.w
$1.0
0
SO SISOOO
w
l IN 1 t
11: w
1604 w
1j�
Lon
!� 0n
y
102 y ski 1400
I
IlnO\UV
u: n;r
l7:N1Y
D
"'618 21
( I/1'"In0
7.
,l.,n
slow
W1 01
101 Y
/)(10100
104 I1t10110
u
ITw
11,40
1611:
2
110240
It stow
11
II1N
It1w
1611:
�-
Mp
11 A7!l0
1
4ul Iw
S •J
Nle
R L\
TBOR
0 Sam
17,
U."
16:16
In
d
p04
p1) 120�n�ID
T
uNrt
0404
w,`.7
611
ma
Y 16tH
7
IMN
we -1
6101 IS
0 _
NOD
d woo
e
&Am
11„04
WIND
0
BI44
2 � 19116
w
rt \n
Ww
www
0 `
10 UO
i1 woo
r
I1M,t
111.
DNr
0
SOHO
VO 11)&2n
n
uN,l
1116:
Tl.wr
0
SO UO
T1 11 k �lne
I
1A111
TIM:
lee,
f.W Op
w
IIN 11
$IIa
Oreille
0
111
10} f1,tNOn
116
11, I 1
{7 se
61 r
1
4 _
law
d i0 00
1u
u,n
TV"
I016010
r
0 f1 TOM
o
r,D
IM 0.
1616
0
0 '.I uYo
qr,0►1N
►N*:
,
F(On
0 Ppe
M►IV
►lerr
Drew1.
I
11. R.,
q2
I {/) N1 /T
C.~ t..16.n (..p.... 100 w..I► LW left"
Q�R�y I'm 1 NY h1r. Ierl � Olw {R"111 I "m (►ere. Y^Y�7 lead
I '11U1i
►RO2ECT TITIL. RR11R OAKF.S 2.1 ADDI I M
PRIM UT LOT ATION MOVTI(ZLLO, 4I10 ESM A
N SI ►ROJ1(T NO.: 102)00
K Qr Old" Ne. I
N• K� l
1 1TIl"Im
1T0 ire IAu I Y Am irfOl?i 13'MITL
',TO Moc IIIa1 All (OMI11n
U1 It Itc 1XII
5 1Tow%e {rte U'i41 1A►o1O5 1n 1►mq
TOT, 1 M1H: 1 T k LU r &dw No. I
GRAND 101 AL
Y011('RER DETAIL LIST
p .
RI: Till'
DATE: 1172111
I'OI (11I:R •(
p
(incl
('Wntl
(w/rri 1111 No•11
Tool 1. NO
()♦••110 Ibl1•i1
►1t1 T"11 OMn
Q••M�11 T•ul
V•••Ilry 1•W
1 IIWTM
/1.)110 11.2110
1.00011 S�JjI7 LK
I SI 21700
1 ll0f'1\li
11.01138 11.%111
I S]W�I lO
I( SI MI 70
1 LLWRto
115100 11,1110
51 T7, 6;
II $�/3j(�7y 00
1 I L0I 11.1
1110 0 1110 0
( 11 I1 10
1 ts� To
i *AIN
1115" SIAM"
1 it r IA un
15p 1110001
11.0gp
5101120
y,nf 101
I I
1 1507.131311
1 )la: v11 711
11)17,IMM'
Council Agenda - 11/24/97
PuhLe He n$ --Consideration of adonting a resolution ad ting
assessment roll for high school storm sewer • Project 97-070.
A REFERENCE AND BA .K .RO TND:
As part of the new Monticello High School construction project, it was
necessary for the City to construct a public improvement project consisting of
trunk storm sewer through the High School parcel providing an outlet from
the Cardinal Hills development through the High School property eventually
discharging into various ponds heading toward the Mississippi River. The
trunk storm sewer project also provided lateral benefit for the High School
development.
With the construction now complete, benefiting property owners will be
assessed for their share of the project cost. The total project with indirect
wets amounted to $265,768, of which $101,306 is attributable as a lateral
benefit to the High School. The remainder of $164,461 is the amount that
could be assessed to benefiting properties within the watershed district.
With the adoption of our recent area storm sewer policy, most of the
undeveloped parcels within this benefited area will be charged in the future
through acreage fees rather than through direct assessments. Only improved
properties are being proposed to be assessed at this time, which mainly
includes the Middle School parcel and numerous lots within the Cardinal
Hills development. The average cost for a residential lot in Cardinal Hills is
under $125. Total assessments for developed property are projected at
$31,196, leaving a balance of $133,265 that will be collected by future trunk
charges.
City Engineer Bret Weiss will be available at the meeting to review the
project cost and proposed assessment roll. It is proposed that the
assessments be spread over 10 years at an interest rate of 6%.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. After considering public input, Council could approve the resolution
adopting the assessment roll as proposed.
2. Council could modify the final assessment amount for some or all of
the parcels based on information provided by the City Engineer or
received through public input.
Council Agenda - 11/24/97
(`. W FF ECOMMENDATION:
In order to meet the December 1 deadline for adopting new assessments for
collection with next year's taxes, it's the staffs recommendation that the
assessment roll be adopted as presented. The majority of the parcels
involved in this assessment roll for improved parcels involved the Cardinal
Hills subdivision, but most of the amounts are in the $125 or less category.
D_ SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proposed assessment roll and map of benefit area; Copy of resolution
for adoption.
Srwt1
NEW MONTICELLO HIGH SCHOOL TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION
PREUNUMARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY PROJECT NO 97-070
- CRY OF MO_ NTICELLO, MINNESOTA
_
wsa PROD NO. 407900 _
TOTAL PROJECT COST = - -
j 164,461 00
TOTAL ASSESSABLEAREA
( SF I • __-
16,375,000.00
ACRES 14
ASSESSMENT PER SF -
4(3_75
f 0 010058 IPER SF
r
PARCEL IO
-
SECTION. TONMSHIP_ I ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
'-fRANGE
AREA
AMOUNT TOTAL'
5071 Martel p
SLOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS
S 17. T 121, RGE 25 I
11,025 I f
111.20
5075 Mann p
LOT 2. BLOCK I. CARDINAL HILLSS
13 - T 121. RGE 25
13.200 I f
172 90
5011 Marlin CW'
'LOT BLOCK 1. URDINAL HILLS_ �
3,
iS 13 -T 121, ROE 25
1Q900 ' f
110 t5 I -_
5015 Martin Of
LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS
_'
,S 13 - T 121. RGE 23 1
27,690 , !
260 W
5051 Martin Or
SLOT 5. BLOCK 1. CARDINAL HILLS
_
S 13 • T 121,, RGE 25
'S
_ _ 17,900 f
110.22
SOat Mart. p
LOT 6, BLOCK 1, CARDINAL MILLS
;9_1
13 - T 121, X25 I
15.160 f
152.63
PO Bo. 221
7, BLOCK '1, CARDINAL HILLS
B 13 - T 124, RGE JS
i 2_.000 !
_
170 62
5101 Mart. 5
ILOT
LOT 6, BLOCK 1. CARDINAL HILLS
S 13.7 121, RGE 25 I
12.000 {
120 62
5121 Mamn Or
_
LOT 9. BLOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS
IS 13- 7 121, ROE 25
12,000 i f
120 u
5010 Mamn Or
LOT 1, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS
17 • T 121, RGE 25
96
11,0 f
420.61 I
5060 Martin (?L-.
LOT 2. BLOCKY.CARDINAL NFL-L§
I$137 121, RGE 25 i
I
12,005 f
_
12087 '.
5100 Marl.. Or
_ LOT 7, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS __.S
�
13 - T 171, RGE 26 _
11,996 ' !
120001
5120 Mart. Or
--LOT 1, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS
IS 13 - T 121, RGE 25_
12,001 � !
, 20 63
5121 Martin Dr
LOC
LOT 5, BK INA MILLS
2, CAROL
S 1
_ 3 • T 121 AGE 25
12.001 f
12063
5101 St;I C!,
_
�EOT 0. BLOCK 2. CARDINAL HILLS
_
S 17 • T 421, ROE 2S
11,970 f
_
110 60
5061 SuAL,!q Or
LOT 7. BLOCK 2, CARDINAL MILLS
$ 1) - T 121, RGE 25
IS
_
12,005 !
12087
50at Sunlrl�p
LOT 6, BLOCK 2:CAROINAL H0A5
15 T 121, ROE 2!
U.006 ' f
_
t]0 9]
5010 Sts" Dr-
LOT I: BLOCK 3, GRDIKAL HILI.b
$ 13 • T 421, ROE 25
13,110: f
135 31
5030 51011-0 p
_
LOT 2, BLOCK 3..001.11E HILLS
IS 1) • T t21, RGE 25 '�
12.000 , f
12062
_
5050 Stara" Or
I LOT 3. BLOCK ), CARDINAL HILLS ---5
-IS
13 • T 171, RGE 25 ---
12.000 f
120 AP
6070 SWIg g 0,
LOT 1, BLOCK ). CARDINAL HILLS
13 - T 121, AGE 25
12,000 !
120 62
W su
50nup 0,
LOT 5. BLOCK 3, CARDINAL HILLS
••'LOT
_ _
S I I • T 121, RGE 25
12.000 tr t
120.62
5100 sunup D,
6, BLOCK 3.. CAR06WL HILLS
IS 13 • T 121, RGE 20 -
11.999 i'
12061
5110 Starling 0,
LOT 7, BLOCK 3, CARDINAL HOA$
19-13. T 121. R-GK25
'-'t 4.991 3-
12081
5127 MaR. Or
ILII 1, BLOCK 1, CARDINAL -t 2ND
• T 121, ROE 25
- 12,005 f
_
12067
5125 Mania Or_
ILOT 7 BLOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
Ill17
S 1) • T 171, RCE 25 I
--
12.100 f
_
171 62
5127 Mamn Or
LOT 3. BLOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS IND
S 13 . T 121, RGE 25
12 920 f
130,06
5121 MwW D,
LOT 1, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
_
15 13 - f721. ROE 25
17,000 I {
12082'
5126 mans, Or
_
LOT 2. BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HIELS 2ND S 13 • T 121.'MGE 25
12,970 f
60.06
5131 Mart.0,
LOT 3, BLOCK 2. CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
15713-72 21, RCA2S
_
12.555 {
126 a0 1
5161 Mamn Or
HILLS b_
!LOT a, BLOCK 2, CARBRAL 2N
S 13OE - T 121, R 25 _I
12_000 f
120 02
5170 Stirling, Or
SLOT 1, BLOCK 3. CARDINAL HILLS 2140
I S U • T 121 RGE 25.
17,0/0 I f
121221
5150 Start" Dr
'LOT 2. BLOCK 7, CARDINAL HILLS 2N6 -'s 13 • T r71, ROE 25 ~_
12,700 f
I
127 65
51" Manar11 LAI,.;SLOT
3. 3. BLOCK CARDINAL MILLS 2ND
11 17. T 121, ROE 25
12,700 f
12765 !
5115 114-118M Lan'
3, CARNAL HILLS 2ND
LOT 1 BLOCK DI
S ll,: 121, RGE 25 -�-•
17.,00 � f
-
131 62
Cil; meftn Lair
LOT 5. BLOCK 3. CARDINAL HILLS JND
IS 13- 1 121 .09'i5-
42.100 ! f
171 62 -
51%1,Aa1ur6 Larr
•• ILOT G. BLOCK 3, CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
'8S 1) • T 121,RGE 25•x-
12,600 , f
126 00
6460 MaUM Lana
LOT 7, 0LOE_K ). CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
_
I8 17-1 121, ROF 2S
11,500 f
ii9 of
W 1t Hoon CI
ILOT S. BLOCK 3, CARDINAL HILLS 2140
5 1) • T 174, RDFS
12,000 S.
120,52
0051 H6ron Cl
LOT 9. SLICK 3..�INAL HILLS 2140
8 13 • T 1T t, RGE 25
19,100 6
152 25 -
_
9050 Heron Cl
' LOT 10. BLOCK') CAROI'NAL HILLS_FNO
- _
S 67'T 121. P& 25
12,700 I t
127 56 1
90601-%. Cl
1 i SLOCKi, CARCIN►L MILLS 2Mo
� S 1) •_f QI:1106 25
-_ 10.300 f
-
161 11
5000 Macara Lan'
LOT 12. BLOCK 3, CARDINACRLL8 2Nd
'LOT
_S 13 • T-121 ROE 25
11,100 I {
111 9{ I
5200 MaOarg Lary
' LOT 13, BLOCK 3 CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
�8 �] • T 121, RGE 25 "_
IS.000 f
, 30 as
6170 MH4r6 Lana
'LOT 11, §SOCK 3,TCilRDINAI MILLS 2ND
1) 121. ROE 25 I
13.600 {
13592
5250 IWMrO Lan'
'LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARbiNAL HILLS 2ND
�S
§r13 • T 121, ROE 25
_
13 500 I !
13592,
5260 Slanlrl0 dr
LOT 1 66cK 5. CARDINAL HILL5 2ND
I S 13 7T 121 RGE 29
10 Sao !
105 12
Pao' 1 7_
ZO•d
SNM1
$240 Slaning Dr
LOT 2, BLOCK S. CARDINAL HILLS 2NO
IS 13 - T 121. AGE 25 1
10,695 {
107 6a
5220 Starting Dr
LOT 3, BLOCK 5. CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
S 13 - T 121, RGE 25
10.700 f
107.77
5210 Slarb% Or `
SLOT a. BLOCK 5. CARDINAL MILLS 2ND
S 13 - T 121, RGE 25
_
11.260 S
11337
S190 Stenhq Or
:LOTS. BLOCKS. CARDIML HILLS 2ND
,S 13 - T 121, RGE 25
10,600 S
105.77
S11i Madero Lane
LOT 6. BLOCK S_GRDINAL HILLS 2NDS
13 • T 121, RGE 25 1
11,670 S
119.10
5149 Mallard Una
ILOT T. BLOCK S. CARDIKAL HILLS 2ND _
*S'13 - T 121, RGE —25,
1.110 1 f
14,07
5153 Mallard Luta
LOT 8, BLOCK S,_CAROOUL MILLS 2ND
_
S U - T 121, RGE 2S
13.070 f
131.59.
51 57 Maeen7 Lana
_LOT_
9, BLOCKS. GRDINAL MILLS 2ND
IS 13 • T 121, RGE 25
17,723 f
133.15 1
5171 Mod !r Lam
_
LOT 10, BLOCK 5, CARDINAL MILLS 2ND_ S 13 - T 121, RGE 23
11,1e0 , {
11 e.60
5191 MalluO La_m
LOT 11, BLOCK 5. CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
16 13 • T 121, RGE 25
12,100 f
124.N
9091 Tanager Ce
IL12, BLOCK 5. CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
_
S 13 • T 121. ROE 25
12.225 {
123.26
9121 Tampa Cv
ILOT U, BLOCK S. CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
S t3 TT1121, RGE 25
1SAW S
139.84
9141 Tanager Cir
`LOT 1.. BLOCK S. CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
S 13 - T 121. RGE 25 I
17,7.0 f
_
176 37
9160 Tanager Clr
LOT 15, BLOCK S. CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
_ S, 3 • T 121, RGE 25 -
14,000
140 95
9140 Tanager Ci
LOT 16, BLOCK S. CARDINAL HILLS 7ND
S 13 - T 121. RGE 25
IS
15.500
-12_500
{
IS
156.05
PO Sor am
ILOT 17, BLOCK S: CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
13 T 121, RGE 25
s
12585
9090 Tamm Clr
l07 16. BLOCK S. CARDINAL MILLS 2ND
S 13 . T t 2t, RGE 25
12,600
S
12686
5131 Muth Or
_
LOT 1. BLOCK 6, CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
S 13 -T 121, RGE 25 1
12,300 s
127.84
513] Martin Dr
LOT 2. BLOCK 6. CARDINAL HILLS 2ND
S 17 -T 121, RGE 25 �_
12,2.5 l f
123�2a
3181 Surtm d
ILOT 3. BLOCK S. CARDINAL MILLS 2ND
S 13 _ T 121, RGE 25
12.600 I f
126.66
9331 Carmsbaa Ct
-LOT 4, BLOCK 6. CARDNAL HILLS 2W6 --S'13
• T 121. AGE 25 ^
12.500 f
12565
9]51 Canvaadat•A Cl
_LOT S. BLOCK 6, CARDINAL MILLS 2NDS
13 • T 721, RGE 23
17,760 f _
17x,78
9371 Connfoaca CI
LOT S. BLOCK 8, CARDINAL MILLS 2NO
1813 -T 121, RGE 25 I
15,600 f
1S7.Oe
9770 Carlvulia0 Ct
SLOT 7, BLOCK S. CARDUTAL MILLS 2ND
S 13 • T 12t, RCE 25
17,515 • f-
- 17634
9350 Canvaellaca Ct
ILOT B, BLOCK S. CARDINAL MILLS 2ND
lS 13 - T 121, AGE 25 �
17170 I f
13S'21
51 Slarleq Or
76
LOT 2, BLOCK S. CARDINAL MILLS 2ND
_
3 13 - T 121, ROE 25 -
12,900 f
_
129 88
9421 Eder Lam
:LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARDINAL MILLS —]RDS
13 - T 121. RGE-2$ -
17.175 f
172.6
er
9391 EdLam
LOT 2, BLOCK 1. CARDINAL MILLS 3RD_
IS 13 • T 121, RGE 25
_
12,060 It
121.32 1
9331 Edd Lane
LOT 3, BLOCK 1, CARDINAL MILLS 3RD
, 5 13 • T 121, ROE 25
12.100 {
121 82
9311 Eder Lim
ILOT 4, BLOCK t. CARDINAL MILLS 3R0
S 13 • T 121, ROE 25 -- -12.300 f
123 ii
9480 Eidal Um
LOT t, BLOCK-2,:QARDINAL HILLS 3RD
68 13_• T 121, RGE 25 ' ---_-
-t i.UO {
11540'
940 Elder Lam
7. BLOCK 7, CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
IS 13 • T 121 RGE 25
11 470 ' f
11 S 4_E
9410E,dar Um
_LOT
3. BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
6 13 . T 121, RGE 25 I
12,900 s
_
12988 1
...!LOT
5731 Falcon Aw
1LOT 4, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
IS i 3 . T 121. ROE 25
9.610
f
26751
_
5751 Felcdn AM
rLOT S. BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS 3RO
SLOT
S 13 • T 121, RGE 25 I
_
8.960
{
90.71
5371 Falcon Aw
S. BLOCK 2. CARDINAL MILLS ]RD
3 13 - T 121. RGE 25
8.880_
f
9021
5391 Falcon Aw
LOT 7, BLDOR 2. CARVIUA L MILLS SAD
I5 13 - T 121, RGE-2S'
8.960 f
90 21
_
5401 Falcon A i
,LOT 8, BLO2.CK CIIRONAL MILLS 3RD
I S 13 _ T 121, AGE 25 1
6.960 f
90 21
_
5471 Falcon Aw
'AOT ,LOT 9, CLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
-5 I] • T 121, ROE 25 I
6.980
{ _
902,
5431 Falcon Aw
LOT 10, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
.6 13 • T 121, ROE 25 —_
7.780
11178
17
5151 Falcon Avg
LOT 11. BLOCK 7, CARDINAL HILLS 3AB
i6 i 3 • T 121, ROE 25 1
7,7eD It
76 17
U61 iaVsn Aw
12, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
,Si] •• T 121, ROE 25 -
-- 6475 I {
65.73 i
9481 Felmn Aw
ILO
LOT 17, BLOCK 2. CARDINAL MILLS ]RD
S 13-`I�2I
1. RGE 23
•• 8 E35 {
ll
_ _
5_491 Falcon Aw
'_ LOT 14, BLOCK 2. CARDINAL MILLS ]RD
IS 13• T 121, RCLT•25
8.420 1
84 77
5511 Fann An
LOT IS, BLOCK 7. CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
10 13 -T 121, 7S
1
7,490 {
75 41
5521 Falcon Ave
ILOT 19, BLOCK 2. CARDINAL HILLS 3R6'—S
_RCE
13-T 121, ROE 2S
7.490 1 S
7541 1
5541 Fekon An
'LOT 17, BLOCK 7. CARDINAL MILLS SAD
S 1] •Y1 N, R08 25 ---_
(4,9441 ' {
150.4
53DI Staneq Dr
LOT 1. BLOCK 3, CARDINAL MILLS 3RD
4 17 • T 121 RGE 25 I
_ 12 000 I f
110 62
5381 Slanmg Dr
S
LOT 2 BLOCK 3, CARDINAL MILLS 3RD
5 T3 . T 121, AGE 25
17.000 {
120 62
5371 Star6n Or
LOT 3, BLOCK 3, CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
'S 13 • 1 121, RUP 25
12 000 {
170 07
5351 $to," Or
AL H
LOT A. BLOCK 3. CAAOINILLS 3RD
VI -S'. T 121. A697K
17,450 I {
125 35 -
1331 3lardng Or
LOT 5 BLOCK 3. CARDINAL MILLS ]RD
�9 13. T 171, ROE 25
12,090 {
171 72
9710 Eider Lam
_'LOT 6, BLOCK 3. CARDINAL HILLS 39B
ACT?.
5 13-TIFRGE 25 I
T ROh
17A s
12,500
17967
125 85
532alcon Aw
0 f
5]70 rou; Aw
BLOCK 3, CAROINAL HILLS ]RD
LOT 6. BLOCK 3. CAN INAL HILLS 3RD
1 ] • 121, 75
.813-f121 RGE 25 • � 1
f
12,400 1 f,
174-04 1
S350 Falcon Ave
_
;LOT 9. BLOCK 3, CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
:6 13 • T 121 RCE 2S
_
17.300 I f
123641
Fekon Aw
LOT 10. BLOCK 3,-GRDIW1l NILLY SRO
11, BLOCK 3, CAR6INAL HILLS ]Rd
g 17� tI1, ROE 7S 1
I6 13 • T 121 � RGE 25
17,000 {
12.000 1 s
120.62
120,67
6300
Fakm
LOT
12, 3, CARDINAL HKLS 300
6 13 • T 121, VaO.. 25 ( ---
12 wo r 1
120 12
5400 Am
SQp Falcon Aw
LOT BLOCK
LOT 13, BLOCK �, CARDINAL MILLS 3RD
15 17 • T 121 ROEE25
1 i',000 6
120 83 t
SLOT 'PO
_
16
12062
AA 30 Falcon An
14, BLOCK 3 CMTD1NAl MILLS
13 • T 121, ROB 25
17,000 s
,�
Paha
2
Sh.01
5450 Fokoe AN
1 S, BLOCK 3. CARDINAL MILLS 3RD
IS U - T 121. RGE 25
12.000 I f
120 92
5180 Falcon Ave
_LOT
LOT 18, BLOCK 3. CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
.S t 3 - T 111. RGE 23 I
12:000 f
120.82
5490 Fatcort Ara
ILOT 17, RLOCK 3. CARDINAL MILLS_3RD
S 13 - T 121, RGE 25
12865 f
129,52
5490 Falcon An
LOT 18, BLOCK 3. CARDINAL MILLS ]RD_
,S 17 - T 121 RGE 25 I
12,600 l f
126,86
5500 Falcon Ara
19, BLOCK 3. CAFDINAL HILLS 37F IS 13. T 121, ROE 25 1
11.760 f
116.60
5520 Falcon Ab
•LOT
LOT 20. BLOCK J, CARDINAL MILLS 306'19' - T 121, RGE 25 I_
12,140 f
_
122,23
5310 Falcon Ar.
LOT 21, BLOCK 3, CARDINAL HILLS3RD
13 • T 121, ROE 23
12,915 f
13003
5270 Starting D,
LO_T 1. BLOCK 4. CARDINAL MILLS 3R0
• T 121, RGE 25'
10!]5
f
105.05
5290 Storting Or
,LOT 2, BLOCK 4. CARDINAL MILLS 3RD_
_L3
IS 1] - T 121, ROE 25 1
9,060
f
99,27
5710 Sterling Or
ILOT 3. BLOCK 4, CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
IS 13 • T 121, RGE 25
10.175
S
105.08
5]20 Starting 0,
LOT 4. BLOCK 4, CARDINAL HILLS 3RO
_I_
S 13 • T 121, RGE 2S.__.
10,230 f
_
103.00
5310 Starling Or
LOT BLOCK 4, CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
IS 17 - T 121, ROE 25
12.100 1 f
124.61
5350 Stampp
.5,
LOT 6, BLOCK 4. CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
IS t] • T 12,, RGE 3S_i2-000
i f
120.62 I
5760 Sto" OF
LOT 7. BLOCK 4. CARDINAL MILLS ]RD_
5 17 - T 121, RGE 25
11,960 f
120,41 1
5380 Starling 0,
_ _
LOT S. BLOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS 3RD
^S 13 • T 121. RGE 25
_
S
-
12052 ,
1 I1 Tkomaa Pork O,
Tnorrlaa
LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS ATM
1LOT
IS 13 - T _121, RGE 25
T
_ _12.000
11.970
( f
120,51
111 Park Dr
2, BLOCK 1. CARDINAL HILLS ITH
S 17 - 122, RGE 29
10.160
• f
105 31
71 t Thomas PMc DI
ILOT ], BLOCK 1. CARDINAL MILLS ATH
S t) - T 121, RGE 2S
11.100.$
i it 75
11 t Thomas, Pork pr_
Si
LOT A, BLOCIc 1. CARDINAL MILLTN
S 13 - T 121, RGE 25
11,300 , f
113 77
i 11_Tlromas Park Dr
LOT 3. BLOCK 1 GRDINAL MILLS ITN
IS 17 • T 121, RGE 25 I
t ].an 7
13526
6, BLOCK 1. CARDINAL HILLS ATH
IS 17 • T 121, RGE 25
_--_
12'0 I i
121 3s,
--1LDT
ILOT 7, BLOCK 1.2LHILLS ATI
S 13 - T 121, RGE 25
13,020 S
171,09
•-_
_ -_LOT S. BLOCK t, CARDINAL MILLS ATM
_
,S 17 - 7 121, POE 23
.0
120 S
_
170 82
LOT 9_ BLOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS ATM
_
'973 • T 121. RGE 25 - _
_
12,000 1
120.82 1
5270 Madam AneLO_T
1, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL "US TIM
S 13 - T 121, ROB
5280 Ma0ar0 LaneILOT'2.
BLOCK 2. CARSHILLS ATI
S'17 - 7 121, ROE 25
11,600 $
116.80
5]00 Maltwd Una
LOT ), BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS 4TH
IS U - T 121, RGE 25
10100 - f
102 69
7521 Cty Rd 39 NE
LOT 4, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS ATM
SIS • T 121, RGE 25
1 i
9051'
5330 Ma9Am UM
LOT 5, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS ATM
9 t 7 - T 121, ROE 25
_8.990
9.770 I f
97 93
5300 MaOntl Lore
I LOT 8, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS ITN
S 13 - T 121, RGE 25
9,1t101
91:62
5360 Madam lone
LOT 7, BLOCK 2. CARDINAL MILLS ATH
S 13 - T 121. RGE 25
9,400.S
94 64
5370 MallamLane
LOT 9, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL MILLS 4TH
S 13 - T 121, RGE
CUD f
a7 39
5360 Militants Lane
LOT 9, BLOCK 2. CARDINAL MILLS ATH
JS U - 1 121, RG I
9,200 1 f
9263
5390 MaCmna aU
LOT 10. BLOCK i CARDINAL MILLS 4TH
_
S 13 • T 121, RGE 25 -I
9,100 • S
99.07
Y110 Maaom lana
LOT 11. BLOCK 2. CARDINAL MILLS 4TH �S 1) • T 121, ROE 25 1
10,200 I f_ —_
102.69
5120 Mollom Lane
LOT 12, BLOCK 2.CAROINAL HILLS ATN
_
t3 13 - T 121, ADEN—
9,400
i
S Mallarts lanai
13. BLOCK 2, LAMINAL MILLS ATM �S U-• T 121. ROE 25
5460 Malleinne U
LOT 14. BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS ATM
6 13 - T 121, ROE 25
92 00
1
92.03
11 t T6omao Pad Or
ILOT 15, BLOCK 2. CARDINAL -HILLS ATH
IS 13ri21, ROE 25 I .-
10,300
f
105.71 1
man
SAW Wallale
LOT 16, BLOCK 2. CARDNAL HILLS 4TH
S 13 - TT 121. RGE 25
11.500 • f
11570
0000 Mtllwi Ane
LOT 77, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL /TILLS ATH
S 13..121, ROE 25_1).700
_
9
1311,00
SS70 Madam loin
LOT 18, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS 4TH
S 1]'-'T ,7,, RGE Js, I
I!
I i
u2 26
15!70 Mallard Lone
LOT 19, BUCK 2, CAROIMAL MILLS 4TH
17 - T_•121, ROE 25
_!,170
12,330 16
121.11
3540 Mallaro lore
LOT 2Q BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS_ 4TN
' S q - T 121. RGE 2]
11,9x0 1
120 81
Poonlane
LOT 1, BLOK3CAROINAL HILLS ATM
S 13• T 1J
!
12,)50
i
120 31
ttTnmpPorr d
- _ARDIAMIS T2IS
ILOT 2. BLOCKY
-T t LG
8
ItR927,
141,66
9240S Cl,
•LOT ), BLOCK 3. CARDINAL MILLS ATM
j8 1 ] • T 171, R�
11,100
f
116 79 •,
9210 Swell—Or
LOT 4, BLOCK ],CARDINAL MILLS 4TH
_
9 13 . T 121, ROE 25
18.650 1
1g7 77
111 Tnoa Pare OF
om
_
'LOT 5. BLOCII 3, CARDINAL MILLS 4TH
IS 13 • T +21, RGE 25 I
1) 07_0 I /
131 691
9231 Stealba C.
_
340'3 6, BLOCK 3, CARDINAL Hula 4TN
�ti 13 • T 177, ROE 25 �_
IB,SW , 1
181 a! 1,
I n Tl7emaa Very_ p
LOT 7 BLOCK ]. UR011TAL_HILIa 4TN
S t I_T 121, ROE 75
10.223 f
163 37 1
54W Stan" Or
LOT 8, BLOCK 3, CARDINAL MILLS 4TH
S 13 • T 121, RGE 215
1
120.82
6140 Star+ktp D
I*COT 9. BLOCK 7, CARDINAL HILLS 4TH
la 13 -T t 2'%K10E_23 I
_12,000
17,000 I 1
12062
9230 WkNew La.
LOT I o. BLOCK 3, CARbM^L MILLS ATN10
13 • T 121, ROE JS
12,000 1
120 a7 r
9210 W',dW, La.
LOT 11, BLOCK 3, CARDINAL MILLS ATM
5 13 • T 121, ROrE 23 i_
12,000 1
120 87
9160 W10gom La
LOT f J. BLOCK 3, CARDINAL NI ATM
la +) •F,JI, R06 26 1
130 I S
12) 7A
SAl+ Yallam lone
1407 t7. BLOCK 1, Gi!2-DINAL MILLS iTM
a 13 • T 131, RGE J!
•-`19 _
til 0.50 1
tot b
5481 Modem Line
LOT 16.9LOCK 3. CARDINAL MILLS ATM
6 13 • T 121. ROE 15
Ia,9801 8
150 82
5401 "a tore lane •
ILOT 15, BLOCK'], CARDINAL WLLB 4TN
IB 1) . T +21, ROE J6
17.170 1 S
130.68
0191 Mallam Lone
LOT 15, BLOCK 3. CARDINAL KILLS 4rH
- T I JI, AGE 25
0
130 04
5501 Motions Lane
LOT 17 Rl OCK 3. CARDINAL MILLS 4T4
.5 .13
6 17 • T 121, R09 2S
_12,016
1 ]295 I 1
13305
47-3
Page
3
170-d VB0L60 L6 -10 -ADN
Snee1,
5411 Mallard Lane
5431 wllard lane
i LOT 18. BLOCK 3, CARDINAL MILLS 4TH IS 13 - T 121. RGE 25
LOT IS, BLOCK 3, CARDINAL HILLS 4TH S 13 - T 121. RGE 2S �_
12.710 it
i7.245 S
127.96
12328
5411 Slarhrp Or.
LOT 1, BLOCK 4. CARDINAL HILLS 4THIS
t7 - T 171, ROE 25 i`
12_000 1 f
120.62
5431 slam" Or _
LOT 2. BLOCK 4. CARDINAL HILLS 4TH
S t] • T 121, R GE 25 _
17.0 S
00
120,62
541 Stamp Or
LOT 3. BLOCK 4. CARDINAL MILLS 4TH
IS 13 • T 121, RCE 25 t
12,000 1 !
12052 1
_
5461 SMAIng Dr.LOT
4, 4: CARDINAL HILLS 4TH
S 13 -_LIZ;. 121, RGE 25
12,000: f
120.82
5461 Sta" Dr. -
DIBLOCK
I LOT S' 4. CARNAL MILLS 4TM �_
IS 13 - T 121, RGE 25 I
_
13.045 ''i
1 39.39 1
Or
LOT 6._8LOC K 4, CARDINAL HILLS
I
_
5591
1 St.*v Or_ --
LOT 7 BLOCK 4, CARDINAL MILS 731
IS 13. T 121, RGE 2S I
•/2.245 I S
'
123.2E
Dr.
5531 Stonup _
LOT 8. BLOCK is CARDINAL HILLS 4TH
S 13 • T 121, RGE 25
IS
_
12.506 S
12692 I
3541 SUAnp Or
LOT 9. BLOCK 4, CARDINAL HILLS 4TH
13 - T 121, RGE 25 I
14100 !
142.97 ,
_
9340 PalZk t Lam .
_
LOT 1, BLOCK 5. CARDINAL HILLS 4TH
_
S 13 - T 121, RGE 25
12,555 {
126 40
PO B4. 1509
-I
LOT 2. BLOCK 5. CARDINAL MILLS 4TH
�13 • T 121, RGE 25 I
12,400 f
124 BA
9260 P411Gn Lone
ILOT 3, BLOCK S. CARDINAL HILLS 4TH
-_
S 13 • T 121, RGE 25
12,430 . S
OW Om1a Lara
LOT 1. BLOCK 1. CARDINAL HILLS 5TH
IS 13. T I21, RGE 23 I
—_ , 14.41-6-S -
_125.33
ii5.06 I
-
9634 Onole Lam
I LOT 2, BLOCK I. CARDINAL HILLS STM
13 - T 121, RGE 25
12._000 f
12887
_ _
94280no1e lane
_,S
LOT ], BLOCK 1, CARDINAL MILLS 5TM
IS 13 - T 171, ROE 25 I
1] 095 !
1)1 64
111 Thomas Part Dr.
I LOT A. BLOCK 1, CARDINAL MILLS STH
S 13 - T 121, RGE 25 �_
12,000 , S
120.52
111 Tm Was Park Or
LOT S, BLOCK 1. CARDINAL MILLS 5TH
IS 13 • T 121, ROE 25 I'
12,000 1 f
120.82 I
111 Therllas Part Dr
[LOT 1, 81.65K 2. CARDINAL HILLS STM
S 13 - T 121, RGE 25
_ _
f
121 22
9133 Or1e1e Lane
UT 2. BLOCK 2. CARDINAL HILLS ST"
IS 137Y121. RGE 25
_12.040
12.090 I f-
121.72 I
9427 One& Lam
-]LOT 3, BLOCK 2. CARDINAL HILLS STH
S 13 - T 121. RGE 25
--12.400
124._ai
T1 11 Thomas Part Dr.
LOT 4, BLOCK 2. CARDINAL HILLS STM
I S 13•• i 121, RGE IS
_f
---t 2,160 f
122A3
f i t Thann POA Dr.
LOT 5. BLOCK 2, CARDINAL HILLS STH
S 13 - Ti21, ROE 25
12.330 13"
124.31
-
111 Thomas Prk Dr
I LOT 8. BLOCK 2. CAP.DIWIL MILLS STM_
[S 13 - 7711. ROE 22 r '_
12.264 I {
123 A7 _
111 TTemas Psh Or
-LOT 7, BLOCK 2 CARDINAL MILLS STH
S 1] - T 121, RGE 2S
17.400 f
124.64
1 t 1 Turmas Park Or^
_
:LOT S. BLOCK 2, URDINAL KILLS STN
S 13 • T 121, RGE 25�
14,100 S
_
141.9151
9210 PWA'"- Lama
LOT 9, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL MILLS STM
I S 13 - T 121, RGE 23I
111 TMmas Park Di
"LOT t 0, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL MILLS STH
S ll. T 121, RGE 25
_
12,245. f
123 28
94190no& Lam
LOT 1, BLOCK 3. CARDINAL MILLS 5TH
IS i]. T 121, RGE 27 i
14.0731%
147.73
I t t Thomas Park Or.
1 LOT 2, BLOCK 3, CARDINAL MILLS ITH
S 13 - T tlt, RGE 2i
1],760 S
134 71
111 Theles Park Or
•LOT 3. BLOCK 3, CARDINAL HILLS 5TH
I S 3-T 121. RGE 25
_
17,000 f
120.62
9290 Mdllep0lyd Lane' LOT 4, BLOCK 3. CARDINAL WILL! STH
S 17 .7 171, RGE 75__
_
12,000 I S
12082.
9250 Moftoyt*d Luy LOT 5, BLOCK 3, CARDINAL HILLS 5TH
I S 13 • T 121, AGE 16
13,778 f
133 66
9710 MmIl I290trd Lam LOT 6, BLOCK 3. CARDINAL MLL8 N
S Ii. Y 121, ROE 7
--14,260 f
143 67 I
• .
9150MpiYt�pta Lem'LOT 1 BLOCK 4, CARDINAL HILLS 3TH
13 137T T 121, RGE 25
_ 13.170 f
I
132.65.1
.
9150 Pettan lam
I LOT 2, BLOCK 4_ CARDINAL HILLS STH
S 13 • T 171, RGE 75
11.960 f
12061
111 i Thdrnn Part Or
LOT 3. BLOCK i CARDINAL HILLS STN
S N - T 121. ROE 25
i 7,190 {
122 7] ,
9000 Pastan Lam_
-.I
I LOT 4. BLOCK i_CARDIN AI MILLS STH_
S 13 • T 171, RGE 75_
12,245 I f
123.70
9050 Omts Lane
LOT 1 Bl CCK S. CARDINAL MILLS STM
S t3 • T 121_ROE 25
12,556 1
126 41 ,
1 t 1 Thomas Park 01.
LOT 1, BLOCK 6, G►ROINAL HILLS STH
5_t] . T 121, RGE 27 (_
12,030 I 1
121.121 -
I I I Turmas Peru Or
_
SLOT 1. BLOCK 7, CARDINAL MMB 5TH
IS t7 • T 171, RGE 28
11,960 1
ILO 61
9191 Patton lane
'l0T 7, BLOCK 7 CARDINAL MILLS 5TH
S i). T 171, RGE 25 I
2.2H'-1
123 26
711 TI10rnaa Perk Or
'LOT 3, DLCCK 7, CARDINAL NkLd 6TM
_
I913.T 121, RGE 25
12,550 f
126 35
9121 Pe4tan Lane
LOT 4, BLOCK 7_ CARDINAL HILLS STM
S 13' T 121, R S I
12,920 f
130001
111 trio res Pari Dr
LOT 5 BLOCK 7,_CARDIM HILLS STM
1911. T 171, RGE 25
_
14,000 f
1409S
:LOT t, LOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS STM_
IS 17 • T 171, ROE 76 I
'12.038 111"'
121,20 1
_
-SLOT 2. BLOCK 1. CARDINAL HILLS 6TH
IS 13 - T III. RGE 2/-'
12,147 {
122 25
-, -_
LOT 3, BLOCK I, CARDINAL HILLS 6�,1
.8 11 • T t21,1aGE 25 I
17 400 1.1
124 04 1
_• __
LOT 4. BLOCK 1, CARDINAL MILLS GTN
IS 17 T 121, ROE 25
_
f_
129 52
.
_ -
:LOT 5, BLOCK 1, CARDIKAL WILLS 6TM
S 13 - T 121, ROE 75 I
_12.865
11.53! I {
12640
LOT B. BLOCK 1. CARDINAL MILLS 6TH
I S t) • T 171 RGE 20
12.450 19
12535
LOT 7 BLOCK' I. CAROVUL MILLS 6TH
' SI • T 171, 46E 20 • •
12,000 1
121.72
_
LOT a. BLOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS 6TH
SLOT
IB 13 - T 171, RGE 25
12.3"j 1
124 37 1
9, BLOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS 6TM
:5 13 - T 121, ROE 2!
1
,
12940
_
,LOT 10 13LOCK 1, CARDINAL MILLS 6TM
Ti 13 - T 121, ROE 7S
_12.553
11,987 I f
12069
.,
LOT 11, BLOCK 1, CARDINAL HILLS 674
IS 1 - T 121 �GE 25•
17,090 f
171 77
-
DIL MILL5 BTW
SLOT 1, BLOCK 7, CARNA
,-
6 13 � f 121, ROE 7!
11,900 {
11911 1
_
LOT 2. BLOCK -7, CARDINAL HILLS 8TH
IS 13_T r 71, ROE 76
q 000 I {
120 C
-LOT 3, BLOCK 2, CARDINAL MILLS 6TM
_
S 13 . T 121, ROE 25
12.000 f
12087
•
LOT 4, BLOCK 2. CARDINAL N0 -LS 6TM
IS 13 - T 121. ROE 75
_
11,870 I 1
12011
_
Papa 4
/ —
GO'd V60160 46-40-AON
ShW i
;LOT 1. BLOCK 3, CARDINAL HILLS 6TH
iS 13 - T 121_ROE 25 _
S I
6,990 7
8,47Y
90.51 I
65.31
R 13 - T 121_RGE 25
LOT 2, BLOCK 3. CAW+IAL HILLS 6TH _-
-. .LOT 3. BLOCK 3. CAROIMAL aLLS 6TH S 13 - T 121,ROE 25
17
6.473 !
I
65.31 ,
-
.LOT 4. BLACK �.. CARDOUL HaIS 6TH '
_
$ 13 • T 1i�.'�tG_E 27 i -
s
96.31
,LOT 7. BLOCK 3. CARDINAL m, --S arm
LS 13-T 121. RCE 25
9 455 I f
95.19
: LOT 6, BLOCK 1. CARDINAL HILLS QTM
I B 13 - T 121_Wa 26 _�
6,660 f
67.38
LOT 7. BLOCI('3. CARDOaIIL MILLS 6711
5 13 • T t21, RGE M I
6.660 I f
67.39
;LOT 6, BLOCK S. CARDINAL MILL$ 6TH
S 13 - T 121, ROE 25
. i
150,21
_
LOT 9, BLOCK 3, CNiDIMAL_NR,LS 6TM
S ii7T T 121, ROE 25
_11,920
13,900 !
139.93.
_
-• " - iLOT 10. BLOCK 3. CARDNAL HILLS 6711 613 - T 121,�fiE ZS I
12,690 ' f
129.76
- I LOT 11. BLOCK 3. CARDIWIL MILLS 6TH
$ IS - T 121. ROE 25
12,160 f
_
122.63
- -LOT 12, BiCK o 3. CARDINAL MILLS
S 13 -'r 121.. Ru25 F
u.990
I LOT 13, BLo 311IA
. cARDERi
MB 6TH
9-1i - T 121. REE 25
- 12.160 f
122,43
. .LOT 14, BLOCK 3. CARDINAL MILLS GYM
51 3 - T 121. ROE 25 I
14,600 I f
146.99
LOT 15, BLOCIL-K: CARDRML MILLS -6TH
9 if - T uE l5 t, RO
13,490:8
135.62
' LAT 16. BLOCK f fARDINAL MTH
s15 H
19 11-T1 121, RQE 2-9-1
16,480 7
165.92
CARDMAL MILLS
I
_
.. -- . LOT 1 E, BLOCK 3. CARCIWLL "IL 6711'
�3 13 - T 5T. RGE 25
16,190 f
19496 .
LOT 19, 91.45pt 3_CARDINAE-WUs STM
•- 13 - T 121, ROB 29_ I
_
12.420 !
.
129 04
JLOT 20, BLOCK 3. CARDINAL MILLS 9TH
lCT'21. BLOCK 3. CARDINAL M118 6.711
S 13 -T 121, ROE 25 _
I9 11- f 1.21, ROE 25
12,420 f
tt,420 f
125.04 -
t 25 b1
1$-666 - M u SCM00L
--.
_
I
479,125 I f
_
4,623.64
... . _ •__..
I -..- -.
.-3,M.594 it
31.196,29
90'd V60160 L6-10-AON
RESOLUTION 97 -
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL
FOR MONTICELLO HIGH SCHOOL STORM SEWER
PROJECT W -07C
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has mel
and heard and passed upwm all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of
2800 ft. of 12 -in RCP storut sewer between School Boulevard and County Road 118 through
the High School properly.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the
lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be
benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied
against it.
Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first
Monday in January 1999, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment
shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until
December 31, 1998. To each subsequent installment when due shall he added
interest for one year on till unpaid installments.
The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property,
with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the
adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city
treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest
accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment
must be made before November 15 or interest will be. charged through December :11
of the next succeeding year.
The City Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this
assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the
county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as
other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 24th day of November, 1997.
Mayor
City Administrator
Council Agenda - 1]/--)4/97
,,,, „, , lii 1
fIrrT.-r-M-7177 .1 14
,
This item was previously heard on November 10, 1997 and tabled to allow
the applicant to work with staff to explore site development options that
would satisfy both the needs of the applicant and the requirements of the
zoning code of the City. A sketch for possible site development plan (see
attached Exhibit A) was prepared and presented to Mr. John Johnson. While
the site plan satisfies the immediate needs for site development, Mr. Johnson
has expressed that the plan may limit opportunities for future building
expansion into the area that would become available if the adjacent portion
of Marvin Road, west of the site, was vacated sometime in the future.
Rather than accepting the sketch plan prepared by staff, Mr. Johnson prefers
that the Council further consider the effect that the possible vacation of
Marvin Road may have on his property and make a determination regarding
his appeal.
As necessary, please refer to the attached information from the previous
meetings.
11 ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Motion to deny appeal of the Planning Commission decision based on
the Planning Commission finding that no hardship exists that
prevents the use of the property if the required building setback is
followed.
Note that granting the variance to the setback under these
circumstances may act a precedent for similar cases.
Motion to overturn the recommendation of the Plarming Commission,
and grant a variance to the required 30 foot setback, allowing a 10 foot
encroachment as depicted by the site plan submitted by the applicant,
based on the finding that Marvin Road has been considered for
possible vacation.
This finding is speculative. No decisions have been made regarding
the future use of Marvin Road.
Council Agenda - 11/24/97
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City staff supports the recommendation of the Planning Commission for
reasons outlined in the attached staff report. It has been demonstrated that
the site may be developed in a manner that is consistent with the needs of
the applicant as well as the requirements of the zoning code. Future
additions are not substantially limited by the possible future vacation of
Marvin Road. A building addition following the possible future lot lines may
create a more interesting building form, to the benefit of both the City and
the applicant.
D_ SUPPORTING DATA;
Copy of Exhibit A --sketch plan prepared by staff demonstrating possible
conforming use of the site; Copy of Council Agenda item from 11/10/97; Copy
of Planning Commission Agenda item and exhibits from 10/7/97; Copy of
Planning Commission meeting minutes from 10/7/97.
�L__
0
Revised Sketch Site Plan
EXHIBIT A
Council Agenda - 1 V1019 i
11. Co cid .ra ion of an appeal of a denial of a variance to the renr yard
setback- Appli - nL io n io n . (J.0.)
As you may recall, at a previous City Council meeting, John Johnson was
granted approval of a conditional use permit allowing a planned unit
development that allowed a car -detailing facility to be constructed on a parcel
west of the auto body shop. The PUD allowed common use of the side lot
lines and associated parking lot. The site plan approved included denial of a
variance request. John Johnson is appealing the decision regarding the
variance request. Please see the attached information from a report prepared
by NAC on the site plan and associated variance.
Motion to deny appeal of the Planning Commission decision based on
the Plan. ting Commission finding that no hardship exists that
prevents the use of the property if the setback law is followed.
Granting the setback under these circumstances would set a
precedent.
Motion to grant appeal of the variance denial based on the finding that
Marvin Road is not likely to be used as a public right-of-way. This
finding is speculative. No decisions have actually been made with
regard to the ultimate use of Marvin Road.
C STAFF R_F.COMMFF.NDATIDN:
City staff supports the Planning Commission decision for reasons outlined in
the Planning Commission's finding and for reasons outlined in the attached
staff reports.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Planning Commission staff report from October meeting; Planning
Commission meeting minutes from October meeting.
Planning Commission Agenda - 10/7/97
DConsideration of a conditional use permit to allow 1) the establishment of an
autobodv reoair shoo and accessory outdoor storage area within a B-3.
Highway Business Zoning District. Zia Planned Unit Development Conditional
5L \ SJse Permit (PUD/CUPjso allow shared use of an outdoor storage area (with
�Cc
4 C�, adjacent autobody shop). and 21 a f...... 4r
CJohn Johnson, (NAC)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
NP Background. Mr. John Johnson has submitted a request to construct an autobody repair
facility upon a 14,650 square foot parcel of land located south of Interstate 94 and west
of Sandberg Road. To accommodate the request, the following approvals are necessary:
1. Conditional use permit to allow the establishment of an autobody repair facility (with
accessory outdoor storage) within a B-3, Highway Business District
2. Planned unit development conditional use permit (PUD/CUP) to allow shared use
of an outdoor storage area (by an adjacent autobody repair facility).
3. Variance from the minimum 30 foot rear yard setback imposed in B-3 Zoning P
Districts.
Conditional Use Permit Review
CUP Review Criteria. The purpose of the conditional use permit process is to enable the
City Council to assign dimensions to a proposed use after consideration of adjacent land
uses and their functions. In this regard, the City of Monticello is provided a reasonable
degree of discretion in determining the suitability of certain designated uses upon the
general welfare, public health and safety of its citizens.
Procedurally, the Planning Commission and City Council must consider the possible
adverse effects of the proposed conditional use. Its judgement shall be based upon, but
not limited to the following factors:
1. Relationship to the Municipal Comprehensive Plan,
2. The geographical area involved.
3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is
proposed.
4. The character of the surrounding area.
5. The demonstrated need for such use.
7-3
Planning Commission Agenda - 10/7/97
Applicable B-3 District provisions list autobody repair and accessory outdoor storage as
conditional uses subject to various performance related conditions. Provided all
performance are satisfied, it is believed the proposed use can compatibly exist upon the
subject property.
Planned Unit Development As shown on the submitted site plan (Exhibit B), the
applicant is proposing to share an outdoor storage area with an adjacent autobody shop
to the north (also owned by the applicant). To accommodate this 'shared use"
arrangement, the processing of a planned unit development conditional use permit
(PUD/CUP) is necessary. The PUD process is intended to allow certain design flexibilities
in order to provide a more desirable development product. Aside from the referenced
outdoor storage area, the PUD may also a=mmodate a shared parking arrangement and
associated parking lot setback flexibility.
Lot Requirements. The B-3 Zoning District does not impose a minimum lot size
requirement. The ordinance does, however, stipulate that lots within B-3 Districts must be
not less than 100 feet in width. At ± 110 feet in width (measured at front setback), the site
in question exceeds minimum lot width requirements.
Setbacks. With the exception of the rear yard setback, the proposed autobody shop
complies with applicable B-3 District setback requirements as shown below.
Required Setback Proposed Setback
Front Yard 30 feet 47 feet
Side Yard 10 feet 17 fuL_
Rear Yard 30 feet (__19 feet
To accommodate the proposed rear yard setback the applicant has requested approval
of a variance. This item will be addressed in a latter section of this report.
Off -Street Parking. According to the zoning ordinance, automobile repair facilities must
provide 8 off-street parking spaces plus 1 space for each 800 square feet over 1,000
square feet. Thus, the proposed autobody shop must provide a total of 11 off-street
parking spaces.
As shown on the submitted site plan, a total of 7 off-street parking spaces have been
proposed. As a condition of PUD/CUP approval, the site plan should be revised to comply
with applicable off-street parking supply requirements. As a means of maximizing land
g -V
Planning Commission Agends - 10/7/97
area devoted to off-street parking, a shared access and parking arrangement should be
considered. Attached Exhibit C graphically illustrates an alternative parking arrangement
which meets the referenced off-street parking requirement.
Outdoor Storage. As noted previously, the applicant is proposing to share an outdoor
storage area with an existing autobody shop located to the north of the subject site (also
owned by the applicant). Va the PUD, such arrangement may be considered acceptable.
Issues related to the possible ramifications of a future property sale on the shared use
arrangement should be subject to comment by the City Attorney and stipulated in the PUD
agreement.
The ordinance states that the vehicle storage area associated with an autobody shop must
be limited to 50% of the area of the autobody shop. Assuming the entire outdoor storage
area is to be devoted to vehicle storage, the outdoor storage area has been found to
comprise + 75 percent of the area of the principal building. Accordingly, the vehicle
storage area should be reduced to 50% of the area of the principal building.
In large part, the configuration of the proposed outdoor storage area prompts the need for
the requested principal building setback variance. To avoid the need for such variance,
consideration should be given to reconfiguring the outdoor storage area in a manner
similar to that graphically illustrated upon attached Exhibit C.
Screening. According to the ordinance, outdoor storage areas must be fenced and
screened from view of residential uses and public rights-of-way. As a result, the outdoor
storage area must be specifically screened from Marvin Road to the west and Sandberg
Road to the east. The ordinance also states that 'vehicle storage areas' must be
minimally screened by a 6 foot high 100 percent opaque fence which is designed to blend
with the autobody shop and constructed of materials treated to resist discoloration.
Surfacing. As a condition of CUP approval, outdoor vehicle storage areas associated with
autobody shops must be surfaced in asphalt or concrete.
Building Materials. According to the ordinance, the advertising wall (of an autobody
shop) which faces the public right-of-way must consist of not more than 50% metal. The
ordinance further states that the secondary or non -advertising wall facing a public right-of-
way must utilize a combination of colors or materials that break up the monotony of a
single color flat surface. As a condition of CUP approval, the autobody shop must comply
with applicable building material requirements.
Lighting. As a condition of CUP approval, all exterior lighting must be hooded and so
directed such that light source is not visible from public rights-of-way or neighboring
residences.
8—.r
Planning Commission Agenda - 10/7/97
Signage. The submitted site plan does not specify the type and location of site signage.
As a condition of CUP approval, all signage must comply with applicable provision of the
ordinance.
Loading. In accordance with ordinance requirements, the site plan should be modified
to illustrate an off-street loading space. /�
�K Variance Review Pica -wtui 2�� LO/ Arr
Variance Review Criteria. As noted previously, the applicant has requested a variance
from the 30 foot rear yard setback imposed in B-3 Zoning Districts.
Section 23-3 of the ordinance slates that in considering requests for variance, the Planning
Commission and City staff must make a finding that approval of the variance will not:
1. Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property.
2. Unreasonably increase the congestion of the public street.
3. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety.
4. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the
neighborhood or in any other way be contrary to the intent of the ordinance.
The ordinance further states that a finding of non -economic hardship must be made and
that the property in question cannot be put to reasonable use if the variance is denied.
In review of the preceding variance evaluation criteria, it is believed that non -economic
hardship (unique to the subject property) does not exist to warrant approval of the
requested variance. As an alternative to the request for variance, a repositioning or
downsizing of the building should be considered. An alternative building "positioning'
which complies with B-3 setback requirements is illustrated upon attached Exhibit C.
DECISION ONE:
Conditional Use Permit
A. Conditional use permit approval as per the site plan depicted upon attached
Exhibit B. Motion to approve a planned unit development conditional use
permit to allow an autobody repair facility (with accessory outdoor storage)
within a B-3 Zoning District, and shared use of an outdoor storage area per
the conditions outlined in Exhibit D.
10 V ' b
Planning C—fission Agenda - 10/7/97
(a) The proposed project is consistent with the spirit and intent of
the Monticello Comprehensive Plan goals and policies and in
keeping with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
(b) The proposed project is consistent with the purpose of the
performance standards of the Zoning Ordinance and planned
unit development.
(c) The proposed project will not have any adverse impacts as
outlined in the conditional use permit section of the zoning
ordinance.
(d) The proposed project shall provide adequate parking and
loading as outlined herein.
(e) The proposed project shall not impose any undue burden upon
public facilities and services.
B. Conditional use permit approval as per the site plan depicted upon attached
Exhibit C. Motion to approve a planned unit development conditional use
permit to allow an auto body repair facility (with accessory outdoor storage)
within a B-3 Zoning District and shared use of an outdoor storage area per
r�J the conditions outlined in Exhibit D.
(t) Findings
(a) The proposed project is consistent with the spirit and intent of
the Monticello Comprehensive Plan goals and policies and in
keeping with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
(b) The proposed project is consistent with the purpose of the
performance standards of the Zoning Ordinance and planned
unit development.
(c) The proposed project will not have any adverse impacts as
outlined in the conditional use permit section of the zoning
ordinance.
(d) The proposed project shall provide adequate parking and
loading as outlined herein.
(e) The proposed project shall not impose any undue burden upon
public facilities and services.
Planning Commission Agenda - 10/7/97
C. Conditional Use Permit Denial. Motion to deny a planned unit development
conditional use permit to allow an auto body repair facility (with accessory
outdoor storage) within a B-3 Zoning District and shared use of an outdoor
storage area.
(1) Findings.
(a) The proposed use is not consistent with the spirit and intent of
the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and
planned unit development regulations.
(b) The proposed use is likely to have an adverse impact upon
surrounding properties.
DECISION TWO: I'tep. ,.h(b
1. Variance — 0. n : • 9 b p c - OD.A '0
A. Variance Approval. Motion to approve a variance from the minimum 30 foot
rear yard setback requirement imposed in the B-3 Zoning District.
(1) Findings
(a) Approval of the variance will not:
(1) Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property.
(2) Unreasonably increase the congestion in the public
street.
(3) Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety.
(4) Unreasonably diminish or impair established property
values within the neighborhood or in nay other way be
contrary to the intent of this ordinance.
(b) The subject property cannot be put to reasonable use if the
variance request is denied.
Mi
12
Planning Co®lselon Agenda - 10/7/97
B. Variance Denial. Motion to deny a variance from the minimum 30 foot rear
yard setback requirement imposed in the B-3 District
(1) Findings
(a) Non -economic hardship has not been demonstrated to warrant
approval of the requested variance.
(b) The property in question can be put to reasonable use if the
variance request is denied.
C. RECOMMENDATION
Based on the preceding review, our office recommends approval of the requested planned
unit development conditional use permit subject to the conditions listed.
It is further our opinion that noneconomic hardship has not been demonstrated to warrant
approval of the requested rear yard setback variance. Thus, we recommend denial of the
variance request.
Q SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A - Site Location
Exhibit B - Site Plan
Exhibit C - Site Plan Alternative
Exhibit D - Planned Unit Development(Conditional Use Permit Conditions
191.07 - 97.18
13
T-1
r
�`' : ' J,r r • 1 / , `.•y....",f'?� r :.. 1 . , r. R /1t // t.'�„� ' ,1-.r,.r(t+r-_.,..
.,., tri /^^7 � . ' I �•'' r / r'�, .,l • r t , ^':�-ti,'' 11 �ty1' I' �•,,?-;�c�:
�... •"^"� t��,`;'.-�... I. j :'1••:.• ,�r^;,..�; �"•".„^., • - t l .i r {1,11• r /.•io.
171
HIGHWAy
`!W+/ •� Ji 1;�,''' "�- w.' � ?,j �`."'�,�; ' ��` % r .-�w^<i :• t ! i 1 i I. tet`-+.•:.%
` ; 1�".P'�N./. •,-f �••...`1 �" ,`^• _1l'f .lj1j �O�!jY; r•t.
N0. 94 r—
0A
S%le %.
=� Ex
-��-
IZ-11
EXHIBIT 8 • SITE PLAN
141.07 LIAC A
- (C5
IZ-11
EXHIBIT 8 • SITE PLAN
n j'4l9
��'"
bl o � Gliotic
�0
,544A( ij'7 rG
lviYi� '
L� t
\O
rI \�
o oo 000.
?-Oo
EXNIMT C • SITE PIAN ALTERNATIVE
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS
(a) The submitted site plan is modified to comply with applicable off-street parting
requirements (11 spaces required).
(b) Consideration is given to consolidating the parking lots of the subject site and
adjacent northerly site in a manner similar to that illustrated upon Exhibit C.
(c) The City Attorney provide comment and recommendation in regard to issues
associated with possible future sale of the subject site or adjacent northerly
property.
(d) The outdoor storage area is reduced in size to not more than 50 percent of the area
of the principal building.
(e) The outdoor vehicle storage area is minimally screened by a six foot high, 100
percent opaque fence which is designed to blend with the auto body shop and
which is constructed of materials treated to resist discoloration.
(f) The outdoor vehicle storage area is surfaced in asphalt or concrete.
(g) Exterior finish materials of the body shop comply with applicable ordinance
requirements.
(h) All exterior lighting is hooded and directed such that the light source is not visible
from public rights-of-way or neighboring residences.
(i) All site signage comply with applicable provisions of the ordinance.
(j) The site plan is modified to illustrate an off-street loading space.
(ki 0►—D.JP S"t4KI. FlA'ti M...# 6• rt -%r -4-d
a (ei) M�...i ♦ a� S.de of A—+* &ab S L.P.
e
.EXHIBIT 0
T-'13
Planning Commission Minutes - 10/7/97
4. THE OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA IS REDUCE IN SIZE TO NOT MORE
THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE AREA OF THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING.
5. THE OUTDOOR VEHICLE STORAGE AREA IS MINIMALLY SCREENED
BY A SIX FOOT HEIGHT, 100 PERCENT OPAQUE FENCE WHICH IS
DESIGNED TO BLEND WITH THE AUTO BODY SHOP AND WHICH IS
CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS TREATED TO RESIST
DISCOLORATION.
6. THE OUTDOOR VEHICLE STORAGE AREA IS SURFACED IN ASPHALT
OR CONCRETE.
7. EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS OF THE BODY SHOP COMPLY WITH
APPLICABLE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS.
8. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING IS HOODED AND DIRECTED SUCH THAT
THE LIGHT SOURCE IS NOT VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY
OR NEIGHBORING RESIDENCES.
9. ALL SITE SIGNAGE COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE
ORDINANCE.
10. THE SITE PLAN IS MODIFIED TO ILLUSTRATE AN OFF-STREET
LOADING SPACE.
Motion based on the following findings: the proposed project is consistent with the
spirit and intent of the Monticello comprehensive plan goals and policies and in
keeping with the intent of the zoning ordinance, is consistent with the purpose of
the performance standards of the zoning ordinance and planned unit development,
will not have any adverse impacts as outlined in the conditional use permit section
of the zoning ordinance, the proposed project shall provide adequate parking and
loading as outlined herein, and shall not impose any undue burden upon public
facilities and services. Motion passed unanimously.
QL Ur JON BOGART MADE A MOTION TO DENY, SECONDED BY ROD DRAGSTEN,
THE VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM 30 FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK
REQUIREMENT IMPOSED IN THE B-3 ZONING DISTRICT BECAUSE NO
HARDSHIP WAS DEMONSTRATED ON THE SITE PLAN. Motion passed
unanimously.
8. Public H rine--Co aid rntion of: 1) n conditional uRp permit to ralow nnen/outdnnr
st�ePaalr and service and nu omoh'1 (recreatio nl vehicle) nnir and in a B-4
7n ing t*-;trirt_ and 21n v rinn a &nm the inimtim5-ft%;Pthnrkimpaqedupon
parl`ine arena nnii nasocia ed with co me 'nl ra n. Applirnnt- Bruce Medlock and
Mjchnel rninntp on b h If of Monticello RV Center. Inc.
Page 5 v — 1 f
Council Agenda - 11/24/97
Lima
nn P]
(J.0.)
Following is a report and ordinance amendment provided by NAC, which
would establish a Central Community District. This ordinance provides a
tool for implementation of the recent update to the comprehensive plan. The
Planning Commission and the MCP have reviewed and approved this
document and hereby submit it to the City Council for adoption.
As you may know, adoption of this document timed well with regard to the
downtown building moratorium which expires November 25.
Please review the following report and consider adoption of the proposed
ordinance amendment. If you wish to table the item, it is recommended that
you extend the moratorium accordingly.
Planning Commission Agenda - 11/4/97
a-
Rleme
rn Pla
(NAC)
The City Council has recently approved the adoption of the MCP Plan as an
amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan. This report provides a
conceptual outline of a proposed zoning district which would be designed to
implement the MCP Plan. In addition, we have developed ordinance text
language for a new zoning district. Bather than attempt to adjust one of the
City's current zoning districts, we wou!d propose to create a new district
which is specifically tailored to the unique aspects of Monticello's downtown
and the goals and objectives of the downtown plan. We have entitled this
district the Central Community District. This title was chosen because it is
expected that the district will include more than just business that the
common title "Central Business District" would infer.
Staff has had the opportunity to review the ordinance concepts with MCP
representatives and staff. Some changes have been incorporated into the
concept reflecting those discussions. Still of concern to the MCP are the sign
regulations. Signs are important in this district both from their
communication function and their impact on the downtown visual
experience. MCP would like to see relaxed sign regulations in the downtown
area for certain signs. We have recommended that MCP work to develop a
set of sign ordinance changes which would better meet the goals of the
Revitalization Plan. However, we do not recommend standards which would
be too flexibly applied within the CCD District.
CCD - CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT
PurMs - The purpose of the CCD District is to provide a method of
implementing Monticello's downtown development plan goals and objectives.
Due to the nature of the downtown plan, some development/redevelopment
proposals will require more extensive City review, including Planning
Commission and City Council action. However, many activities should be
able to develop without public meetings or hearings.
Permuted Uses - The permitted uses listed in the City's current B-1, B-2,
B-3, and 13.4 Districts are proposed to be permitted uses in the CCD District.
In addition, the Permitted Uses in the Public/Semi-Public District (primary
public parks and the city hall) would also be permitted, as well as civic and
governmental uses which may be found in a community center. Restaurants
and off -sale liquor would be included as a permitted use.
9-1
Planning Commission Agenda - 11/4/97
Permitted uses would also include residential dwellings, provided that such
dwellings do not occupy ground floor space of a building. That is, residential
units would be permitted as long as they occupy upper floors of otherwise
commercially -used buildings.
The list of permitted uses would exclude the following from those mentioned
above: gas station/convenience store (included as a conditional use);
hotels/motels (included as a conditional use).
Accessory lIL - Accessory uses are allowed in the district with language
such as the following: Accessory uses which are clearly and customarily
incidental to the principal use in size, activity, and scope. The primary
difference here is that parking (normally listed as an accessory use) is going
to get particular treatment in a separate section.
Condetional Use - Conditional uses would include gas stations/convenience
stores as allowed in the B-3 district, hotels and motels without the 500 sq ft
of lot area per unit limitation of the B-3 District, and residential uses which
occupy the ground floor of a building. In addition, some of the B-3 and B-4
conditional uses would be included here, such as pet clinics, fast food (but
with provisions which manage the auto -orientation of such uses), daycare,
outdoor sales, but only as a temporary accessory use to an existing retailer.
Interim Uses - The ordinance would be set up to allow for interim uses at
this time but would not specify any particular use. Instead, the City could
consider individual interim use requests as text amendments as they are
proposed by landowners in the district.
ietArea - It is proposed that no lot area minimums would be established in
the CCD District. Some lot area per unit requirements would be applied
based on specific use, however. For instance, we would recommend a lot area
per unit requirement of 3,000 sq ft per residential unit be established, except
for first floor and single family residential. In these latter categories, we
would recommend 9,000 sq ft per unit. We would also recommend a density
credit for private "structured" parking. This credit could be written into the
ordinance. A credit of 25% could result in an incentive to avoid open parking
lots.
Lot Width - Like lot area, we would not envision any minimum lot widths.
Minimum widths tend to discourage multiple use of buildings in downtown
districts.
B sit 1nQ Height - A maximum building height of 35 ft would allow for
3 -story buildings. A minimum building height of 15 ft would help to avoid
prohlems with low profile contemporary architecture. We would also
recommend that a conditional use permit process be included to allow
buildings outside of this envelope. ^ 9
•
Planning Commission Agenda - 11/4/97
Design Guidpjone - The design guidelines found in the MCP Downtown
Plan would be developed in the ordinance as follows:
Permitted uses complying with all other standards would be
referred to the design sections of the Plan for reference.
Conditional and interim uses or developments requesting a
variance from the performance standards in the District would
be required to comply with the design guidelines of the Plan as
reviewed and interpreted by the Design Advisory Team and
applied by the Planning Commission and City Council.
Developments which receive direct financial assistance from the
City or one of its entities such as the HRA or EDA would be
required to comply with the design guidelines. Financial
assistance could include TIF, tax abatement, revolving loans for
rehabilitation, or other types of direct assistance. City
assessment of improvements under §429 would not typically be
considered direct assistance.
It is envisioned that the design review process would be
administered by a Design Advisory Team. The DAT would
prepare a report on design compliance to be submitted to the
Planning Commission or City Council (depending on the nature
of the project), just as staff reports are prepared by Planning,
Engineering, Public Works, or other staff. The applicant could
appeal a determination of the Design Advisory Team through
the normal zoning appeal process. This process is likely to add
30 days to the review time of CCD applications. Fully -
complying, privately -financed permitted uses would receive
design review for information and encouragement only under
this process.
Signsk - Signage would be reviewed along with the design review process
for both compliance with the City's sign ordinance as well as compatibility
with the Downtown Plan's guidelines. The CCD District language would
include references to the Plan's signage recommendations.
At issue would be whether the DAT could offer greater flexibility to sign sizes
or locations than city ordinance would allow. There are two general concerns
with this concept. First is the issue of the authority of the DAT, a non -
municipal entity, to make zoning decisions. There would little problem with
the design review function, where an appeal process exists through the
Planning Commission or City Council, to make a final zoning determination.
Giving the DAT final review authority, however, would probably be
considered an inappropriate delegation of the City's zoning power.
9-3
Planning Commission Agenda - 11/4/97
A second matter regards the amount of flexibility which the DAT or the City
can grant in sign size, area, or location. Since these issues are zoning
related, they would be held to the same standards as other zoning actions.
Therefore, they must be reasonably related to the furtherance of a legitimate
City zoning objective. In sign cases, it is almost impossible to meet this
standard when varying the regulations case by case. The standards must be
applied evenly in the district to avoid an "equal protection" challenge.
If the community would like to expand the allowable signage available to
district property owners, the sign ordinance could be amended to effect this
change. We would not recommend site -by -site variances within the district,
however.
Parkin - The issue of off-street parking is one of the most difficult in a
downtown district. Assuming that some of the parking capacity will be
accommodated in public lots and on -street, it would be inefficient to require
the full amount of parking demand in private, off-street parking lots. Some
cities provide for all downtown area parking in public lots, exempting all
businesses from any off-street parking requirements. Some cities have
developed parking funds to help develop public lots in the downtown. Others
reduce the parking supply requirement and provide for public use of private
lots as a condition of allowing the reduction in parking area. The following
schemes summarize the options:
Exempt CCD properties from any private parking requirements.
This would put the burden for parking on public lots and on -
street parking. Many of these public lots are assessed to the
district to finance their acquisition and construction.
Maintain the requirement for parking spaces as identified in the
City's parking regulations but allow property owners to be
exempted from the requirements with the payment of a fee into
a CCD parking fund. The fee amount could be established to
induce a property owner to forego private parking area in
consideration of more building coverage on a lot by discounting
the fee as it relates to actual parking lot construction.
Allow private parking lots at a reduced rate of parking supply
on the condition that the owner make the lot available to other
downtown business patrons. This concept is intended to induce
cross use of private parking areas and reduced parking area lot
coverage.
These schemes could be used in combination or provided as
options to the property owners. If the City assesses for public
parking improvements, it could provide an assessment reduction
for participation in any of these programs. The key would be to
10
Planning Commission Agenda - 11/4/97
develop a system which is an incentive to avoid individual
private parking lots as would typically be found in a suburban
commercial development.
Site Improvements - The Downtown Plan includes a number of site
improvement requirements and recommendations for development in the
district. Examples of these are rear building treatments, parking lot and
entry treatments, and private landscaping and streetscaping elements.
These recommendations would be referenced in the CCD District language as
baseline requirements for development, similar to the application of the
architectural guidelines.
Motion to approve the proposed zoning ordinance amendment as
presented, creating a "CCD", Central Community District, as a land
use district in the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, based upon findings
that the amendment would implement the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Table action on the proposed zoning amendments at this time pending
additional information.
Motion to deny the proposed zoning amendments.
r STAFF F. .OMMF.NDATION:
Stafrecommends approval of the zoning ordinance amendment. The
amendment has been subject to the review of the MCP, and we have made
alterations to the text reflecting the input of that group. If the Planning
Commission feels that it has inadequate background on the issue, staff would
suggest tabling until such time as revisions can be made which better reflect
the Planning Commission's intent.
Exhibit A - Draft Ordinance
9-r
City of Monticello
Wright County, Minnesota
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 4, GENERAL DISTRICT
PROVISIONS, AND CHAPTER 14 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE
RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE "CCD", CENTRAL COMMUNITY
DISTRICT.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA HEREBY ORDAINS
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Chapter 4-1 [DJ is amended by adding Subdivision 4-1 [D] 5. as follows:
4-1 [DJ 5. CCD, Central Community District
Section 2.
Chapter 14 is amended by adding Chapter 14B as follows:
CHAPTER 14B
"CCD" CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT
SECTION:
1413.1: Purpose
1411.2: Permitted Uses
148.3: Accessory Uses
148.4: Interim Uses
1413.5: Conditional Uses
148.6: Lot and Building Requirements
148.7: Design Review
148.1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the 'CCD", Central Community District is to
implement the plans and policies of the Monticello Downtown Revitalization
Plan, as that Plan is designed to provide for the establishment and continuation
of a traditional downtown area in Monticello's primary commercial core. The
district will contain a mix of hand uses which can compatibly coexist, with
requirements based upon enhancement of the district's natural features, and
mitigation of land use conflicts between differing uses. All proposed uses in the
"CCD" District will be evaluated against the goals and objectives of the
Monticello Downtown Revitalization Plan as adopted, and as may be amended,
by the City Council.
14&2: PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted Dues in the "CCD" district:
[A] All permitted uses as allowed in the "B-4" district, except for motor fuel
facilities and convenience stores, and hotels/motels.
[B] Restaurants, but not fast-food, or convenience type.
[C] On- and Off -Sale Liquor establishments.
[D] Civic and Governmental uses as a pan of a public Community Center.
[E] Residential Dwellings which do not occupy the ground floor space of a
building.
14B-3: ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted accessory uses in a "CCD"
District:
[AI Uses which are clearly and customarily incidental to the principal use in
size, activity, and scope, and in accordance with the special provisions
of this Chapter. Except for parking, accessory uses shall be located in
the same principal structure as that of the principal use, and shall occupy
no more than thirty (30) percent of the floor area of said structure.
14B-4: INTERIM USES: The following are allowed as Interim Uses in the "CCD"
district:
]AI None.
14B-5: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are allowed as Conditional Uses in the
"CCD" district: (Requires a Conditional Use Permit based upon the procedures
set forth in and regulated by Chapter 22 of this Ordinance).
]AI Hotels, subject to the following conditions:
I. The principal building Ion coverage is no less than fifty (50)
percent of the property, exclusive of easements devoted to public
pedestrian use or other outdoor public spaces.
q-1
2. The building, site, and signage meets the standards for the
"CCD" district, and design review approval is granted by the
designated Design Advisory Team.
3. The proposed use demonstrates compatibility and consistency
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown
Revitaliization Plan.
[B] Motor fuel station, auto repair -minor, and titre and battery stores and
service, as allowed in the "B-4' district; and subject to the following
additional conditions:
1. The design of the site promotes pedestrian access adjacent to and
along the property.
2. No more than two (2) curb cuts of twenty four (24) feet in width
or less shall be permitted.
3. Site lighting shall utilize fixtures similar in style to that
designated by the City for use in public areas of the "CCD"
district.
4. The building, site, and signage meets the standards for the
"CCD" district, and design review approval is granted by the
designated Design Advisory Team.
5. The proposed use demonstrates compatibility and consistency
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown
Revitalization Plan.
IC] Residential dwellings on the ground floor, subject to the following
conditions:
I. The proposed site for residential use is consistent with the goals
and objectives of the Downtown Revitalization Plan.
2. The proposed site does not interrupt the now of commercial
pedestrian traffic in the "CCD" district.
3. Density for ground floor residential units shall not exceed one
unit per 9,000 square feet of lot area, exclusive of land area
utilized by, or required for, permitted uses on the property.
]D] Drive-in and convenience food establishments as allowed in the "B-3'
district, and subject to following additional conditions:
9-S
I . The design of the site promotes pedestrian access adjacent to and
along the property.
2. No more than two (2) curb cuts of twenty four (24) feet in width
or less shall be permitted.
3. Site lighting shall utilize fixtures similar in style to that
designated by the City for use in public areas of the "CCD"
district.
4. The building, site, and signage meets the standards for the
'CCD" district, and design review approval is granted by the
designated Design Advisory Team.
5. Drive through facilities comply with the requirements of Subd.
1413-5 [E] of this Chapter
6. The proposed use demonstrates compatibility and consistency
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown
Revitalization Plan.
JE] Drive through windows accessory to other principal uses in the "CCD"
district, subject to the following conditions:
1. Service through drive-through facilities is accessory to interior
on-site, or sit-down, service within the same building.
2. Drive through lanes are designed to avoid disruption of
pedestrian and vehicular traffic flow, both on and off site.
3. landscaping and other site improvements are included which
screen automobile stacking space from the public street.
4. The principal building occupies no less than forty (40) percent of
the property, exclusive of easements devoted to public pedestrian
use or other outdoor public spaces.
5. The building, site, and signage meets the standards for the
"CCD" district, and design review approval is granted by the
designated Design Advisory Team.
6. The proposed use demonstrates compatibility and consistency
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown
Revitalization Plan.
9-9
IF] Animal pet clinics, as allowed in the "B-3' district.
[G] Day-care centers, as allowed in the "11-3' district
[H] Shopping centers, provided that the proposed use demonstrates
compatibility and consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and
the Downtown Revitalization Plan.
[I] Buildings of a height greater than the maximum building height as
allowed in Subdivision 146-6 [D] of this Chapter.
[J] Planned unit development (PUD) subject to the provisions of Chapter 20
of this Ordinance, and provided that the proposed use demonstrates
compatibility and consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and
the Downtown Revitalization Plan.
1411-6: LOT AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS: The following requirements shall
apply to all properties in the "CCD" district:
[A] Minimum Lot Area: None
[B] Minimum Lot Width: None
ICJ Residential Density: One dwelling unit per 3,000 square feet of lot area
for permitted residential uses. The number of dwelling units may be
increased by up to twenty five (25) percent over the permitted density
for projects which provide at least half of the required parking
underground or in above grade structures such as ramps or decks
(including covered at -grade parking areas).
[D] Building Height: The following height limitations shall apply to all
buildings in the 'CCD" district:
1. Minimum Height: Fifteen (15) feet.
2. Maximum Height: Thirty Five (35) feet, or three (3) stories,
which ever is greater.
[E] Setbacks: Building setback minimums and maximums shall reflect the
recommendations for the useand location as listed in the Downtown
Revitalization Plan. Where setbacks as discussed in the Downtown
Revitalization Plan are not listed or appropriate, there shall be no
building setbacks required. In such cases, there shall be no parking
allowed in the areas between the front building litre and the public street.
9'/O
[F] Site Improvements: All areas of a parcel within the "CCD" district shall
be subject to the applicable recommendations of the Downtown
Revitalisation Plan. Site Improvements shall be reviewed for
compliance by the Design Advisory Team together with other design
elements, including architecture and signage.
[G] Parking:
Supply: Property owners shall comply with the parking supply
requirements as listed in Subd. 3-5 [H] of this Ordinance.
However, property owners may be granted flexibility from a
portion of their required parking supply under the following
conditions:
a. At the property owner's choice, for each parking space
not supplied on-site by the property owner, the owner
shall pay into a "CCD" Parking Fund an amount as
established by City Council Resolution. Said Fund shall
be used for the acquisition, construction, and/or
maintenance of publicly owned parking in the "CCD"
district.
In addition to, or as an alternative to, the option listed in
Subd. 1413.6 [G]La., a property owner may supply
parking at a rate which is sixty (60) percent of the
requirement listed in Subd. 3-5 JHJ, provided that the
owner grant an easement to the public for automobile
parking use over the subject area. The owner shall retain
responsibility for maintenance of said parking area.
Location: Parking shall not be located on a parcel between
the front building line of the principal building and the public
street, except where expressly provided for by the City Council,
after recommendation from the Planning Commission.
JHJ Signs: The following requirements shall apply to all sign displays and
construction in the "CCD" district:
Signs shall comply with the Monticello Building Codes and
Zoning Ordinances relating to signs, including special allowances
which may be made for the "CCD" district.
All signs in the "CCD" district shall receive review and approval
from the Design Advisory Team.
9-11
Signs in compliance with applicable ordinances: For
signs which meet the regulations of the City's sign
ordinances and the goals and objectives of the Downtown
Revitalization Plan, such review shall be given the weighs
of an administrative determination. Appeal of a
determination by the Design Advisory Team shall be as
provided for in Chapter 23 of the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance.
Signs not in compliance with applicable ordinances:
Signs which do not meet the regulations of the City's sign
ordinances shall require review by the Board of
Adjustment and Appeals, as provided for in Chapter 23 of
the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, following Design
Advisory Team review and recommendation.
14B-7: Design Review: All development and redevelopment projects in the "CCD"
district shall be subject to design review for compliance with the goals and
objectives of the Downtown Revitalization Plan. This subdivision identifies the
process and application of design review recommendations.
(A) The City Council shall designate a Design Advisory Team (DAT) to
carry out the requirements of this Subdivision. The Council may
delegate membership determination to another private or public board.
Said DAT shall review projects which in the "CCD" which propose new
or altered buildings, site improvements, or signs. Site improvements
shall include parking lots, landscaping projects (other than direct
replacement of existing landscaping), walkways and open space plazas,
or other outdoor projects affecting the visual impact of a site.
1. Plats shall be submitted to the DAT for review no less than
seven (7) days prior to a DAT meeting. An applicant shall
submit at least six (6) sets of plans. The DAT meeting shall be
open to the public, but shall not constitute a "public hearing"
within the meaning of the zoning ordinance.
2. Submitted plans shall be sufficiently detailed to identify proposed
materials, colors, locations, and any other factors relating to the
visual impact of the proposal. Such plans may include: Site
Plans, Floor Plans, Building Elevations, Rendered Drawings,
Materials Samples, and other appropriate submissions.
3. The DAT shall render its decision for approval or denial of a
submitted design review application at the same meeting at which
a proposal is properly presented. A written report of the DAT's
9-/}
findings shall be forwarded to the Zoning Administrator for
information to the Planning Commission. Upon written request
of an applicant, the DAT may table action on a proposal for up w
thirty (30) days. If the DAT does not render a decision within
the required time frame, an application will be deemed approved.
[B] Appeals: Appeals of an adverse decision of the DAT may be made to
the Planning Commission the applicant, an abutting property owner, or
another property owner within the "CCD" district. Said appeal shall be
governed by the process and requirements listed in Chapter 23 of the
Monticello Zoning Ordinance.
[C] Status of DAT Decision: Decisions of the DAT shall be treated as
follows:
1. Permitted Uses which comply with all building code and zoning
ordinance standards: DAT decisions shall be advisory to the
Building Official.
2. Conditional and Interim Uses: DAT decisions shall be given the
status of administrative determinations, to be submitted to the
Planning Commission for inclusion in its recommendation to the
City Council.
3. Uses requesting variances: DAT decisions shall be given the
status of administrative determinations, to be submitted to the
Planning Commission for inclusion in its recommendation to the
City Council.
4. Proposals receiving direct financial assistance from the City or
one of its official entities: DAT decisions shall be considered
final, subject to the appeal process outlined in this Subdivision.
Section 3.
This ordinance shell become effective from and after its passage and publication.
//S//
"IS
Council Agenda - 11/24/97
10. Review of 9 -month liquor store financiml reporL (R.W. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Liquor Store Manager Joe Hartman will be in attendance at the Council
meeting to review and answer questions you may have regarding the 9 -
month liquor store financial report. Overall, the report appears favorable in
that our gross profit has increased for the 9 months to $348,707 from
$321,000 for the same period last year, and our resulting operating income is
very acceptable at 12.4, of sales, or $176,075. Operating income is up
$7,000 over the same period last year, and overall net income with
investment interest earrings is at $192,432 as of September 30.
With the 4th quarter typically being one of the higher quarters for sales
volume and income potential, we are expecting to have our total annual sales
be near or exceeding $2 million for the fust time. We are also hopeful that
our overall net operating income will be in the 12'% range, which should put
us over $200,000+ in operating income at year's end.
Other than review of the financial report and discussions with the Liquor
Store Manager, no other action is necessary at this time. I know that from
Joe's perspective, he feels that the size of our store may limit the amount of
sales we can produce in the future and limits the number of products we can
display and offer for sale. In order to expect our sales to continually grow, we
may be faced with looking at expansion of the facility some day to accomplish
this. While the operation continues to be profitable, we may want to look at
the feasibility of investing in a building expansion versus the potential
increase in revenue we could expect, from such an enlargement. If time
permits, you may want to discuss these ideas Monday night.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Accept the financial report as presented.
Copy of 9 -month financial report.
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
GROSS PROFIT
BY PRODUCT
COMPARISON FOR
THE YEAR
ENDING SEP 30,
1996 AND 1997
1996
1997
YEAR-TO-DATE
YEAR-TO-DATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
Liquor Sales
364,471
390,178
Discounts
Coot of Sales
266,544
273,768
GROSS PROFIT -
LIQUOR
97,928
26.91
116,410
29.82
Beer Sales
809,641
834,756
Cost of Sales
630,351
636,260
GROSS PROFIT -
BEEF.
179,290
22.11
198,496
23.81
Wine Sales
137,377
140,462
Coot of Sales
104,060
111,369
GROSS PROFIT -
WINE
33,317
24.32
20,093
20.71
.- Jc Sales
45,262
54,035
Coot of Sales
30,351
42,671
CROSS PROFIT -
MISC TAXABLE 14,911
32.91
11,364
21.02
Mloc Non taxable Sales
2,808
3,543
Coot of Sales
1,354
3,945
GROSS PROFIT
- MISC NON
TAXA 1,454
51.81
(402)
_0_
A
TOTAL SALES
1,359,559
1,422,073
TOTAL COST OF
SALES
1,032,659
1,068,013
TOTAL FREIGHT
COST
5,705
6,253
TOTAL GROSS PROFIT
321,194
23.61
348,707
24.52
'NERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
Poroonal Services
Salaries 80,274
PERA 3,582
FICA 6,272
Insurance 6,741
Unemployment Bonefito 10
Severance Pay 1,892
98,771 7.3%
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
Supplies
Offico Supp1100
General Operating Supplie
Other Supplieo
TOTAL SUPPLIES
r
24.5%
88,725
3,962
6,786
6,677
30
106,180 7.52
959 269
5,800 8,129
200 268
6,959 .5% 8,667 .6%
10• ;
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE AND EXPENSES
COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR
ENDING SEP 30, 1996 AND 1997
1996
1997
YEAR-TO-DATE
YEAR-TO-DATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
SALES
Liquor
364,471
390,178
Bear
809,641
834,756
Wine
137,377
140,462
Other Merchandise
45,262
54,035
Misc Non -Taxable Sales
2,808
3,543
Discountr.
TOTAL SALES
1,359,559
1,422,973
COST OF GOODS SOLD
(1,038,364)
(1,074,266)
GROSS PROFIT
321,194 23.6%
ooaovoe�oo
348,707
Qo�vea9eeo
'NERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
Poroonal Services
Salaries 80,274
PERA 3,582
FICA 6,272
Insurance 6,741
Unemployment Bonefito 10
Severance Pay 1,892
98,771 7.3%
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
Supplies
Offico Supp1100
General Operating Supplie
Other Supplieo
TOTAL SUPPLIES
r
24.5%
88,725
3,962
6,786
6,677
30
106,180 7.52
959 269
5,800 8,129
200 268
6,959 .5% 8,667 .6%
10• ;
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE AND EXPENSES
COMPARISON FOR THP YEAR
ENDING SEP 30, 1996 AND 1997
1996 1997
YEAR-TO-DATE YEAR-TO-DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
Other Services & Charges
Professional Services
Maintenance Agreements
Communication
Travel -Conference -Schools
Advertising
Insurance
Utilities, Electric
Utilities, Heating
Utilities, Sewer & Water
Maintenance, Equipment
Maintenance, Building
Maintenance, Other
Depreclot lon--Acqulred As
Other Mioc Expenses
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CH
TOTAL GENERAL & ADMIN EXPENS
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME
Other Income (Expense)
Interest Income
I Cash Long/Short
Sale of Property
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
NET INCOME (EXPENSE)
Transfers In/Out
ADJUSTED NET INCOME (EXPENSE
1
2,491
1,659
4,477
9,270
9,407
875
76
758
4,650
10,077
2,440
46,358 3.4%
152,089 11.2%
169,105 12.4%
11,791
(261)
11,530 g%
180,697 13.32
180,697 13.3%
2,310
1,887
243
2,888
9,287
10,433
632
95
3,249
2,300
39
11,477
12,947
57,786
172,633
176,075
16,590
(144)
16,446
192,432
1.2%
13.5%
192,432 13.5%
jp• 3
Current Assets:
Cash
Change Fund
investments
Accounts Receivable
A/R - NSF Checks
Inventory
Prepaid Insurance
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
BALANCE SHEET
30Sep97
317,953.09
1,600.00
365,075.63
(586.69)
230,516.98
5,869.07
------------
920,608.08
Fixed Assets
Land & Parking Lot
Buildings
Furniture & Equipment
less: Accumulated Depreciation
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
Liabilities
Accounts Payable
Duo to EDA Fund
Sales Tax Payable
Salaries Payable
Accrued Vacation/Sick Leave
Other Accrued Expon000
TOTAL LIABILITIES
RETAINED EARNINGS
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
I-
66,591.03
234,106.13
87,291.07
(252,289.45)
115,696.78
1,036,104.86
118,464.51
70,000.00
13,240.83
10,404.83
22,043.94
2,311.60
236,465.71
799,639.15
1,036,104.86
Council Agenda - 11/24/97
C1. Presentation by Al Derayter Mlatinff t.n r , ,
Monticello Chamber of Commerce President Grace Pederson and Buffalo
resident Al Deruyter requested an opportunity to present information to the
City Council concerning the proposed Superior Landfill expansion plans
proposed for their landfill site in Monticello Township. Grace is not acting on
behalf of the Chamber of Commerce but as an area land owner near the
proposed expansion site.
At this time, I have no other information to provide the Council other than
Ms. Pederson's request for Mr. Deruyter to provide background information
that the Council may not be aware of concerning the proposed landfill
expansion plans in the works. Other than this project being located in
Wright County, I do not believe the City Council will have any direct input
on the plans other than ultimately contacting the County Planning and
Zoning and County Board of Commissioners.
Pm not aware of any action being requested by the Council other than to hear
a presentation by these adjacent land owners.
Council Agenda - I V24/97
12. Conaaideration of schedulong a meeting with Monticello Townghin to
discuss annexation issues. IR.W.I
A R_F.FERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At our last meeting, Council approved the idea of submitting a proposal to
the Township Supervisors concerning amendments to the Orderly
Annexation Area in an attempt to resolve the annexation disputes. The
proposal as prepared by our Planner, Steve Grittman, was forwarded to
Township Chairman Franklin Dean, along with a cover letter offering the
proposal as a solution to the annexation petitions.
The Township Board discussed our proposal at their regular meeting
November 17 in a closed session. On Tuesday, I received a request from the
Township Clerk that the Supervisors were interested in setting up the first of
the three meetings to discuss the annexation proposal as requested by the
Municipal Board. 1 had inquired as to what parts of our proposal were in
dispute or which areas they wanted to discuss further and requested that
they provide this information in writing to the City Council prior to a
meeting being established. 1 felt that if we could narrow down which issues
needed further discussion, it would provide a better agenda for a joint
meeting rather than simply starting from scratch on the entire annexation
area and annexation petition issues. Ms. Sawatzke indicated that the
Township attorney would he sending a letter in response to our proposal,
although I have not yet received it. I would suggest that the Council have an
opportunity to review the comments from the Township's attorney regarding
our proposal before any additional meetings are scheduled.
Council may also discuss whether a joint meeting of the Supervisors and
Council members should be conducted with a neutral third party moderator.
Possibly meeting at a neutral site with a moderator and the opportunity for
each party to caucus separately to discuss specific issues during the meeting
may provide n better opportunity for arriving at a solution rather than
simply both sides again stating their positions and adjourning the meeting to
another date. This is only an idea for discussion, and I have not yet
determined who might be available as a moderator for this purpose who
would be familiar with the issues at hand.
11 ALTFRNATIVE ACTIONS:
Council could set a meeting date as requested by the Township prior to
receiving any comments regarding our initial proposal.
Council could delay setting a meeting until you've had time to review
the response to our proposal.
Council Agenda - IV24/97
Council could suggest that a subcommittee or the attorneys for both
parties first meet to narrow down the issues that need to be discussed
by the full bodies.
C. STAFF RFF.COMMF.NDATION:
It would seem that unless we can get a response from the Township on which
particular items in our proposal need further discussion, setting another
meeting date may be premature at this time. If none of our provisions are
acceptable to the Township, we would be starting from scratch with no clear-
cut agenda other than to discuss the OAA in general with both parties
providing their positions again. Maybe this will result in a compromise, or
maybe it just means well have one to three more meetings.
None.
2.
_'•.^.0 "'.ANC!AL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
:20/77 16:34:36 Schedule o` Bills CLOSOS VO4.30 CCVERPACE
OL540R
Reoort Selection.
RUN CROUP... D1120 COMMENT... 11/20 CKS
DATA JE IC DATA COMMENT
D 11201997 251 11/20 CHECKS
:un instructions.
Jobo Canner Conic::; Form (Tinter Hold Soaco Lf'I Lines Ct'I
J 0' SCEC I: S 6 065 10
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
CITY OF XNTICELLD
C"0/97 16:34:42
Schadule of Bills
G1.54OR404.30 PAGE I
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME FUND A ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE
POI F/P 10 LINE
A E MICHAELS
NATER -BLDG REPAIR
4.87
BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 601.49440.2230
29409
251 00001
NATER -PAINT TRAY LINER
1.48
BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 601.49410.2230
29414
251 00002
5.35
'VENDOR TOTAL
ACME TYPEWRITER INC
DEP REG -2 CALCULATORS
370.62
OFFICE EOUIPMENT 101.41990.5701
71881
251 00003
AFFORDABLE SANITATION
REFJSE-HILLCREST
63.90
MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43230.2199
NOVEMBER
251 00004
ARE GROUP
PARK ;MAINT SUPPLIES
173.21
MISC REPAIR 6 MTC SUPPLI 101.45201.2299
205005
251 00014
STREETS -LIGHT REPAIR
235.64
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199
206047
251 00013
408.85
'VENDOR TOTAL
AMERICAN PAGINO OF MINNE
JOHN M 6 RICH C
21.38
TELEPHONE 601.49410.3210
251 OO005
NAT1
32.24
TELEPHONE 602.49190.3210
251 00006
PATTY
81.41
TELEPHONE '01.42701.3210
251 00007
JOHN 3
14.19
TELEPHONE 101.43110.3210
251 00008
'RY
14.19
TELEPHONE 101.424D1.3210
251 00009
I
AN L
14.19
TELEPHONE 101.45201.3210
261 00010
TOM 8
14.19
TELEPHONE 101.43715.3210
251 00011
ROGER
14.19
TELEPHONE 101.43120.3210
251 00012
212.98
'VENDOR TOTAL
AR -BEE TRANSPARENT PRODU
REFUSE -BAGS
682.00
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43230.2199
1605
251 00015
ARAMARK
CH-1EJPPLIES
30.50
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41040.2199
703319
251 00015
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO
FARM -DOOR
219.00
BIOSOLIDS FARM INPROVENE 602.40480.4315
00395
211 00017
AUTOMATION SUPPLY
DATA PROC-PAPER
211.02
PRINTED FORKS A PAPER 101.41020.2030
7140193
251 00011
BARCO ma 13. INC.
STREITB-SUPPLIEI
201.01
M1SC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41120.2190
100111
251 00020
ICE/SNOM-SUPPLIES
120.30
NISC OPERATINO BUPPIIES 101.11125.2111
100166
211 00021
1.026.29
*YENOOR TOTAL
BATTERY NNlOMLI, INC.
NATER -BATTERIES
111.90
EQUIPRENT REPAIR PARTS 601.40110.2210
11112
251 00022
180Y CORPORATION NAR
LIOUOR-TAM RISC
412.11
LIOUOA 601.49160.2510
21242200
261 00021
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
" "0/97 16:34:42
Schedule of B111e
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME
FUND 6 ACCOUNT
BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR
LIQUOR -TAX MISC
624.65
LIOUOR
609.19150.2510
1,105.83
'VENDOR TOTAL
BERNICK'S PEPSI COU COM
LIOUOR-TAX MISC
60.90
MISC TAXABLE
609.49750.2540
BJORKLUNO CO., IVC.
KLEIN 1 -ABANDON 2 WELLS
725.00
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC
458.49201.3199
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATI
KLEIN FARMS 4
2,250.00
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC
458.49201.3199
BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORA
FINANCE -FORMS
128.22
PRINTED FORMS 6 PAPER
101.41520.2030
CELLULAR 2000 OF ST CLOD
TOM B
151.42
TELEPHONE
101.43115.3210
FIRE
2.15
TELEPHONE
101.42201.3210
GARY
49.09
TELEPHONE
101.12101.3210
BATT
12.10
TELEPHONE
601.49440.3210
245.36
'VENDOR TOTAL
CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INC.
SHDP-SUPPLIES
205.03
MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES
101.13121.21 99
CLARK FOOD SERVICE, INC.
CN -SUPPLIES
213.32
RISC REPAIR 6 MTC SUPPLI
101.11910.2299
COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COXPA
STREETS -SUPPLIES
325.41
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES
101.13120.2199
COMPRESS AIR i EQUIPMENT
FIRE -TRUCK SUPPLIES
24.49
REPAIR 6 MTC - MACH 6 EO 101.42201.4011
CULLIGAN
NOVEMBER RENTAL
75.45
RENTAL HOUSE EXPENSES
210.19201.1301
OAHLHEIMER OISTR18UIING
BEER
5,105.16
BEER
609.19750.2520
WON ALCOHOLIC
65.40
RISC TAXABLE
609.49150.2540
5.550.55
'VENDOR TOTAL
DAVID'S PHOTOGRAPHY
FIRE PICTURES
97.00
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.12201.3199
DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
EER
2.009.10
BEER
600.49750.2520
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GLS10R-VO4.30 PAGE
CLAIM INVOICE
26177700
45600
1789
96212
4151408
mH
■
P01 F/P ID LINE
251 OCD24
251 00025
251 00026
251 00217
251 00019
251 00031
251 00032
151 00033
251 0003!
251 00035
251 00036
251 00037
251 00038
151 00030
251 OOCtO
251 00011
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
" 20/91 16:34:42
Schedule of Bills
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME
FUND 6 ACCOUNT
DOTY/KAREN
KAREN -TRAVEL EXPENSE
82.60
TRAVEL EXPENSE
101.41301.3310
EARL F ANDERSON 1 ASSOCI
8LDG-FORMS
247.54
PRINTED FORMS 6 PAPER
101.42401.2030
STREETS -SUPPLIES
1,010.17
MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES
101.43120.2199
1,257.71
*VENDOR TOTAL
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAIN
FIRE -PUMP REPAIR
1,020.20
REPAIR 6 MTC - VEHICLES
101.1220 1.
IOSO
EMVIROBATE
NMTP-REMOVE FLASHING
500.00
PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION
136.19201.3025
FAT -MAR TUBE 6 METAL FAB
MATER TRUNK FEE
1,018.75
TRUNK LINE AREA CHARGE
255.34115
SANITARY SEWER TRUCK
2.031.50
TRUNK LINE AREA CHARGE
262.34115
STORM SEWER TRUNK FEE
1,094.39
TRUNK LINE AREA CHARGE
263.34115
7,150.61
*VENDOR TOTAL
FLESCH'S PAPER SERVICES,
'IOUOR-SUPPLIES
140.65
LIOUOR STORE SUPPLIES
509.49754.2140
FYLES EXCAVATING 1 HONEY
AN SHELTER -SUPPLIES
3,760.81
BUILDINGS
101.42701.5201
GARTNER'S OFFICE PRODUCT
CH -SUPPLIES
611.93
RISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
101.11301.2099
PM -SUPPLIES
17.02
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
101.43110.2099
698.95
*VENDOR TOTAL
GENERAL RENTAL CENTER
MATER -OP SUPPLIES
33.10
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES
601.49410.2199
MATER -BLADE
41.41
UTILITY SYSTEM NICE SUPP
601.19110.2210
77.51
$VENDOR TOTAL
GRIGGS, COOPER 6 COMPANY
FREICHT
9.00
FREIGHT
601.19750.3330
LIOUOR
641.37
LIOUOR
609.49750.2510
MINE
145.11
MINE
609.19150.2530
795.75
*VENDOR TOTAL
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
BEER
2,149.10
BEER
609.10750.2520
HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
FIRE-VEN REPAIR PARIS
9.11
VEHICLE REPAIR PARIS
101.42201.2211
EWER -SUPPLIES
15.62
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES
602.49490.2199
STREETS -WRENCH
11.17
SMALL TODLS 1 EOUIPRENT
101.43120.2410
STREETS VEN REPAIR PARTS
122.91
VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS
101.43120.2211
PARKS YEN REPAIR PARTS
11.69
VEHICLE REPAIR PARIS
101.46201.2211
CLAIM INVOICE
3556
5320
11712
7816
REFUND
REFUND
CITY OF NONITICELLO
GL540R-V01.30 PAGE 3
PO! F/P ID LINE
251 00011
251 00046
251 00015
14SIT11-IL
251 00048
251 00019
251 00050
251 00051
945600 251 00052
7735 251 00053
251 OOOSI
251 OOOSS
602663 2S1 00057
602108 251 00056
251 00056
251 00059
251 00060
140113,140511
251 00061
251 00160
251 00161
251 00162
2sl 00163
251 00164
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
CITY OF MONTICELLO
"'20/97 16:31:12
Schedule of Bills
GL510R-V01.30 PAGE 1
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE
POS F/P ID LINE
HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
PARKS -SMALL TOOLS
57.85
SMALL TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 101.15201.2110
251 00165
PARKS -cSUPPLIES
35.13
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.15201.2199
251 00156
263.21
*VENDOR TOTAL
HAWKINS NATER TREATMENT
WATER-T/POTABLE
36.00
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.19110.3199
251 00055
NATER -CHEMICALS
2,571.93
CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 601.49440. 2160
251 00065
SEWER -CHEMICALS
712.28
CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 602.19190.2160
251 00061
3,3210.211-
'VENDOR TOTAL
NOR ENGINEERING, INC.
WWTP-AUGUST
31,780.50
PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 135.19201.3030
251 00062
WNTP-SEPTEMBER
11,113.19
PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 136.19201.3030
251 00063
WWTP-OCTOBER
39,031.35
PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 136.19201.3030
251 00061
115,525.31
*VENDOR TOTAL
HEARTLAND APPRAISAL
RIDGEVIEN-APPR FEE
610.00
MISC: PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.46522. 3199
11991, 12597
251 OOD69
HERMES/GERALD T
'IBRARY-CLEANING
227.50
PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 'IT .45501.3110
11/16-11/30
251 OOD68
HOGLUND COACH LINES LTO
BUS CONTRACT
5,929.98
PROF SVR - HEARTLAND BUS 610.49101 .3060
OCTOBER
251 00070
HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP
HRA-DWWTWN REVIT
15,895.97
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.16522.3199
251 00261
NOME JUICE
TAXABLE RISC
102.00
RISC TAXABLE 609.49750. 1540
17318, ego 19
251 00071
KEARIN/WILLIAM F
CEMEIARY-MISC PROF SERV
600.00
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 651.19010.3199
251 00072
KEN ANDERSON TRUCKING
21 ANIMALS
t29.10
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.42701. 3190
37. 5
251 00073
KING/JAMES N
STREET CLEANUP
150.00
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.83120. 3199
3269
251 00220
FIRE
95.85
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.12201.3199
3295, 3291
2S1 00027
LIBRARY
95.15
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 211.15SO1.3199
3295, 3291
251 00028
LIOUOR
95.05
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 609.19751.1199
3295, 3291
251 00029
RIVERSIDE CEMETARY
2.175.50
PROF SRV - LAWN SERVICE 651.19010.1105
3295, 3291
251 00030
3.313.05
*VENDOR TOTAL
'^%LES SAND 6 GRAVEL
.ALT/SAND
820.50
SOD 101.13125.2110
251 00074
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
CITY OF MONTICELLO
" 120/91 16:34:42
Schedule of Bills
GLS4OR-VO4.30 PAGE 5
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE
POI F/P 10 LINE
KRAMBER 6 ASSOCIATES INC
ASSESSING SERVICES
1,738.39
PROF SRV - ASSESSING 101.41550.3125
NOVEMBER
251 00075
LARSON'S ACE HARDWARE
STREETS -SUPPLIES
207.91
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199
251 00076
SHOP -SUPPLIES
23.66
MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199
251 00077
LIBRARY -BLD REPAIR SUPP
6.37
BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 101.43127.2230
251 00078
DARKS -SUPPLIES
61.41
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101./5201.2199
251 00079
PARKS -BLDG REPAIR SUPP
23.35
BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 101.45201.2230
251 00080
MATER -BATTERIES, TAPE
24.05
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 601.49440.2199
251 00081
FARM -BUSH HEX
8.07
BIOSOLIDS FARM IMPROVEIQ 602.19480.1385
251 00082
OEP REG-FILTERS/81TERIES
54.26
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41990.2199
251 00083
PARKS -EQUIP REP PARTS
30.82
EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.45201.2210
251 00084
NATER-MAINT SUPPLIES
49.39
UTILITY SYSTEM MTCE SUPP 601.19110.2270
251 00085
NATER -BLDG REPAIR SUPP
13.34
BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 601.49440.223D
251 00086
MATER -PUMP
53.24
SMALL TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 601.19110.2410
251 00037
SEWER -SUPPLIES
38.81
141SC OPERATING SUPPLIES 602.49190.2199
251 00088
STREETS -TOOL
37.26
SMALL TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 101.43120.2410
251 00089
LIBRARY-CLNING SUPPLIES
12.11
CLEANING SUPPLIES 101.43121.2110
251 00090
LIBRARY -SWILL TOOL
15.95
SMALL TOOLS i EQUIPMENT 101.13127.2110
251 00091
660.71
-VENDOR TOTAL
1UEEN EQUIPMENT INC.
STREETS -R 6 M EQUIPMENT
329.25
REPAIR 6 MTC - MACH 6 EO 101.4 3120.4014
29708895
251 00093
MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING
STREETS -SIGNAL LAMPS
180.93
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199
1649267
251 00091
MARCO BUSINESS PRODUCTS,
REPAIR FAX
75.11
M1SC REPAIR 6 RTC SUPPLI 609,40754. 2299
1707595
251 00005
MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE
STREETS -SUPPLIES
87.83
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199
251 00096
PARKS -GOPHER BAIT
12.76
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.15201.2199
251 00097
RIVERSIDE -POSTS
35.46
RISC REPAIR 1 RTC SUPPLI 651.19010.2299
251 00098
136.05
$VENDOR TOTAL
MADS FOODS
WWTP SUPPLIES
64.38
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 116.19201.2199
251 00099
WWTP-FILM DEV
145.17
PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 416.49201.3025
251 00100
CH -COFFEE ITEMS
7,91
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41940.2199
251 00101
AN SHELLER-CLNINO SUPP
32.36
CLEANING SUPPLIES 101.42701.2110
251 OOt02
SHOP -SUPPLIES
64.29
M1SC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199
251 00103
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
60.19
RISC OPENATINO SUPPLIES 211.45501.2199
251 00104
EC DEV SUPPLIES
33.53
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.46501.3199
251 00105
415.83
$VENDOR TOTAL
OWALL COMPANY
CH A/C REPAIR
135.00
REPAIR 6 MTC MAGI 6 EO 101.41910.4011
177785
251 00106
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
�20/9T 15:34:42
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
MICHELS TRUCKINO, INC
FREIGHT
MICROBIOLOGICS, INC.
MATER -COLIFORM TEST
MID CENTRAL DOOR COMPANY
AN SHELTER -DOORS
MIDWAY IROI 6 METAL CO,
AN SHELTER-REBAR
MINNEGASCO
CH
DEP REG
PARKS
NATER
FIRE HALL
SHOP/GARAGE
LIBRARY
LIM STORE
'N SHELTER
.H
DFD REG
PARKS
MATER
FIRE
SHOP/GARAGE
LIBRARY
IBI JAYCEES
ADVER71SINO
RN MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE AS
LIQUOR
MONTICELLO CHAMPION AUTO
PARKS SUPPLIES
PM INSP•VEH MAINT
WNTICELLO PRINTING
FIRE -ALARM NOTICES
PW PRINTED FORMS
AN SHELTER PRNTED FORKS
i PM INST-SENER FORMS
Schedule of Bills
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME
FUND 6 ACCOUNT
100.00
FREIGHT
609.49750.3330
30.45
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC
601.49140.3199
8,005.61
BUILDINGS
101.42701.5201
536.18
BUILDINGS
240.49201.5201
134.58
GAS
101.11910.3830
23.49
GAS
101.41990.3830
43.24
GAS
101.45201.3830
5.77
GAS
501.49110.3830
71.64
GAS
101.12201.3830
1.032.93
OAS
101.13121.3830
74.35
GAS
211.45501.3830
48.15
GAS
609.49751.3830
48.84
GAS
101.42701.3830
35.12
GAS
101.41940.3830
13.21
GAS
101.41990.3830
15.56
GAS
101.45201.3130
13.71
GAS
501.49110.3830
37.03
GAS
101.12201.3830
191.09
GAS
101.43127.3830
20.31
GAS
211.45501.3830
1.809.16
'VENDOR TOTAL
$2.50
ADVERTISING
509.49754 .3409
170.00
DUES, MEMBERSHIP 6 SUBSC 609.41754.4330
10.60
MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES
101.45201.2199
19.09
VEHICLE REPAIR PARIS
101.43115.2211
29.69
•VENDOR TOTAL
38.34
RISC PRIN11N0
101.12201.3599
126.57
PRINTED FORMS 6 PAPER
101.11110.2030
265.10
PRINTED FORMS 4 PAPER
107.12701.2070
103.04
PRINTED FORMS 6 PAPER
101.11115.2030
533.14
•VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-VO4.30 PAGE 6
CLAIM INVOICE
119160
22520, 22436
OCTOBER
OCTOBER
OCTOBER
OCTOBER
OCTOBER
OCTOBER
OCTOBER
OCTOBER
OCTOBER
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
ANNUAL DUES
11599
11599
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
CITY
OF MONTICELLO
" 20/97 16:34:42
Schedule of B111e
GL54OR-V01.30
PAGE
7
14.
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME FUND i ACCWNT
CLAIM INVOICE POI
F/P 10
LINE
MONTICELLO SENIOR CITIZE
CONTRACT
2,833.33
SENIOR CENTER CONTRIBUTI 101.45115.3136
DECEMBER
251
00138
MONTICELLO TIMES
LEGAL
2,912.87
LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 101.4
1501.3510
251
00139
BLDG PERMITS
181.20
GENERAL PUBLIC INFORNATI 101.42401.3520
251
00140
PUBLIC HEARINGS
391.21
LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 101.4
1210.3510
251
00141
NATL GUARD ARMORY
13.38
LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 101.4
1910.3510
251
00142
ST HENRY'S
61.28
LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 101.11910.3510
251
00143
MATER
39.30
GENERAL PUBLIC IMFORMATI 501.49110.3520
251
00144
COIOM GUIDE
1,663.20
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.46501.3199
251
00145
DEP REG-SUBSC
29.00
DUES, MEMBERSHIP 6 SUBSC 101.4
1990.4330
251
00146
ADVERTISING
231.11
ADVERTISING 609.49754.3499
251
00111
CH -AD SALE
180.00
BUILDINGS 240.49201.5201
251
00118
PLAMNINO-HELP AD
57.15
LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 101.41910.3510
251
00149
REFUSE
201.70
ADVERTISING 101.43230.3499
251
00150
PLANNING
217.50
GENERAL PUBLIC INFORRATI 101.41910.3520
251
00151
STREET CLOSING
21.00
GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATI 101.43120.
3520
251
00152
NO WNW DOT
61.28
LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 450,49201.
3510
251
00153
6,350.21
-VENDOR TOTAL
"TICELLO VACUUM CENTER
.IBRARY-VA000N PARTS
32.06
RISC REPAIR i 0I7C SUPPLI 211.45501.2299
11199
251
00155
KMTICELLO-810 LAKE
AN SHELTER -PROF SERVICES
231.91
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.42701.3199
ZACK-RUNAWAY
251
0013D
RONTICELLO/CITY OF
LIQUOR SEWER/NATER
31.21
WATER i SEMER 609.49754.3820
251
00133
MOOOY'S INVESTORS SERVIC
PROF SERV -LEGAL FEES
5,300.00
PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 458.49201.3040
97DC0541
151
00154
MOON MOTOR SALES, INC.
PARK•HEOGE TRIMMER
425.95
SMALL TOOLS 6 EOUIPMENI 101.45201.2410
251
00156
DARKS -OP SUPPLIES
53.41
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.15101.2199
251
00151
PARK-VEH REPAIR PARTS
17.11
VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.45201.2211
1151
00158
PARKS -SMALL TOOL
30.01
EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.15201.2210
251
00159
$32.54
$VENDOR TOTAL
PTO COMMUNICATIONS, INC
ADVER71SINO
195.00
ADVERTISING 609.49131.3199
251
00092
NATIONAL BUSHING PARTS b
SIREEIS-VIN REPAIR PARIS
85.11
VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2211
151
00167
STREETS -SPALL TOOLS
42.59
SMALL TOOLS 8 EOUIPPENI 101.4
3120.
151
00168
STREETS-LUBS
56.78
LUBRICANTS i ADDITIVES 101.43120.2110
251
00169
EWER LUGS
80.11
LUBRICANTS i ADDITIVES 692.49490.2110
251
00110
165.22
$VENDOR TOTAL
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
CITY OF MONTICELLO
" 120/97 16:34:12
Schedule of Bills
GL54OR-VO4.30 PAGE
8
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME
FUND
6 ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE
POO F/P 10
LINE
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
MATER
1.170.11
ELECTRIC
601.49440.3810
251
00171
SEWER COLLECTION
153.40
ELECTRIC
602.49490.3810
251
00172
STREET LIGHTS
5,041.56
ELECTRIC
101.43160.3810
251
00173
DEP REO
78.92
ELECTRIC
101.41990.3810
251
00111
PARKS
428.13
ELECTRIC
101.45201.3810
251
00175
CIVIL DEFENSE
3.14
ELECTRIC
101.42501.3810
251
00175
SHOP/GARAGE
4.98
ELECTRIC
101.13127.3810
251
00177
LIBRARY
28.84
ELECTRIC
211.4
5501.3810
251
00118
PARKING LOTS
86.11
ELECTRIC
101.43140.3810
251
00179
LIQUOR
875.11
ELECTRIC
609.49754.3810
251
00180
7,872.53
-VENDOR TOTAL
OLSON 4 SONS ELECTRIC, I
SIGN REPAIR
569.75
REPAIR 4 MTC OTHER
609.49754.4099
251
00111
STORK-PARKING LOT LIGHTS
290.50
1997 STORM DAMAGE EXPENS
101.42501.1101
251
00112
LIBRARY-FLOOR LAMP
59.11
FURNITURE 6 FIXTURES
211.45501.5601
251
00183
SEWER-EQUIP MAINT
318.59
REPAIR 6 NTC MACH 6 EO
602.19490.4011
251
00181
ST LIGHTS-REPAIR
2.585.17
REPAIR 6 MTC MCH 6 EO
101.43160.4011
251
00185
PARKS-REPAIR MIRING
3,239.55
REPAIR 6 MTC - MCH 6 EO
101.45201.4044
251
00116
NATER-TESTING
1,366.30
REPAIR 6 MIC MCH 4 EO
601.49440.4011
251
00187
8,459.57
'VENDOR TOTAL
ONE CALL COMCEPTS, INC.
LOCATES
708.00
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC
601.19440.3199
OCTOBER
251
00192
PATCH/FRED
FRED-IRAVEL RE1MB
$6.51
TRAVEL EXPENSE
101.12401.3310
251
00207
FRED-TELEREINB
37.80
TELEPHONE
101.12401.3210
251
00.100
94.31
-VENDOR TOTAL
PAUSTIS 6 SONS
WINE
159.00
WINE
609.19750.2530
83068
251
00195
FREIGHT
3.00
FREIGHT
509.49150.3330
83068
251
00195
172.00
-VENDOR TOTAL
PHILLIPS COMPLETE TREE S
STORM BLVD TREE TRION
3,612.30
1097 STORK OANAGE EXPENS
101.42501.4401
2564
251
00191
PHILLIPS MINE 6 SPIRITS
FREIGHT
76.11
FREIGHT
609.49750.3330
251
00107
LIQUOR
8,526.51
LIOM
601.49750.2510
251
00198
MINE
1,666.89
MINE
609.49150.2530
251
00199
6,269.90
$VENDOR TOTAL
PHOTO I
NEWSLETTER-FILM DEV
6.34
NEWSLETTER
101.41301.3195
251
00200
LANNINO-FILM DEV
12.14
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC
101.41910.1199
251
00201
31.40
•VENDOR TOTAL
SRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
" 120/97 16:31:42
Schedule of Bills
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME
FUND 6 ACCOUNT
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
TAX MISC
631.40
RISC TAXABLE
609.49750.2540
PRECISION MEASURING SYST
PW/INSP-LEVEL ROD 6 TAPE
391.02
SMALL TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT
101.43115. 2410
PREUSSENJUNES L
CH
460.00
PROF SRV CUSTODIAL
101.41940.3110
DEP REG
120.00
PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL
101.41990.3110
PUBLIC WORKS
150.00
PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL
101.43110.3110
730.00
*VENDOR TOTAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GR
WW7P CONTRACT
31,259.00
PROF SRV - PSG, INC
602.49480.3090
QUALITY MINE 6 SPIRITS C
LIQUOR
152.29
LIQUOR
609.49750. 2510
WINE
521.00
MINE
602.49750. .1530
723.29
•VENDOR TOTAL
ROO EQUIPMENT 00
"TREETS-AIR COMPRESSOR
11,000.39
OTHER EQUIPMENT
101.43120.5101
RELIABLE CORPORATIOM/THE
CH
16.03
RISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
101 .41301.2099
DATA DROC
349.52
RISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
101.41920.2099
PLANNING
81.25
RISC OTHER EXPENSE
101.41910.4399
515.81
$VENDOR TOTAL
RELIANCE DATA CORPORATIO
STREETS -FAN
123.29
SMALL TOOLS d EQUIPMENT
101.43120.2410
RIVERSIDE OIL
STREETS- FUEL
1,862.83
MOTOR FUELS
101.43120.2120
RON'S GOURMET ICE
ICE
155.70
RISC TAXABLE
602.19750. 2540
ROYAL PRINTING 6 OFFICE
PUBLIC IWORAS-SUPPLIES
120.70
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
101.41110.2099
SALZWEOEL/PAIRICIA
NOVEMBER CONTRACT
2,259.40
PROF SRV - ANIMAL CTRL 0 101.12701.1120
SCHLUENOER CONSTRUCT [ON
PARKS -SEWER REPAIR
720.00
REPAIR 6 NTC - BUILDINGS 101.1$201.1010
RCURNE COUNTY CITIZEN
PET AD
10.00
ADVERTISING
600.19154.1199
CLAIM INVOICE
968210
3196
CLEANING
CLEANING
CLEANING
DECEMBER
m
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GLSIOR-VO4.30 PAGE 9
POI F/P ID LIRE
251 00202
251 00203
251 00204
251 00,105
251 00206
251 00193
151 00209
251 00210
251 00211
251 00.112
251 00,113
251 00214
93816
18559, 18588
251 00221
251 00211
251 00715
251 00272
251 00129
251 00225
251 00271
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
CITY OF MONTICELLO
"'20/97 16:31:12
Schedule of Bills
GL51OR-VO1.30 PAGE 10
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE POS F/P ID LINE
SOFTWARE SPECTRUM
DATA PROC-CAL CREATOR +
367.00
SOFTWARE 101.11920.3091
251 00227
SPRINGSTED, INCORPORATED
KLEIN FARMS 1
15.068.65
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 158.19201.3199
PRELIM TO ISS 251 00223
ST JOSEPH EQUIPMENT INC
STREETS -TRAILER
5,920.00
OTHER EQUIPMENT 101.13120.5801
251 00221
SUPERIOR SERVICES -CENTRA
GARBAGE
8,653.93
PROF SRV - REFUSE COLLEC 101.13230.3100
OCTOBER 251 00228
SURPLUS SERVICES
STREETS -BOOTS
70.00
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 101.4 3120.2111
251 00188
NATER -BOOTS 6 ACCESS
38.50
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 601.19110.2111
251 00189
PW INSTP-BOOTS
10.00
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 101.13115.2111
251 00190
INSP-BOOTS
20.00
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 101.12101.2111
251 00191
138.50
'VENDOR TOTAL
T C BUILDERS INC
GRADING, SUMP, CLEAN UP
1,050.00
ESCROMS - COMO OCCUPANCY 101.22013
2S1 00231
RPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
BEER
5,257.25
BEER 609.49750. 11520
251 00229
RISC TAXABLE
67.55
RISC TAXABLE 609.19150.2510
251 00.130
5,321.80
'VENDOR TOTAL
TOTAL DISPOSAL SYSTEMS
STORM-PU SRAM PILES
183.23
1997 STORM DAMAGE EXDENS 101.12501.1101
251 00219
TRUEMAN-WELTERS, INC.
STREETS -EQUIP REPAIR PRT
11.53
EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.13120.2210
251 00232
A U.S. POSTMASTER
REFILL POSTAGE METER
1,500.00
POSTAGE 101.11301.3220
251 00233
PW 2 ROLLS OF STAMPS
61.00
POSTAGE 101.4 3110.3220
251 00231
1,561.00
'VENDOR TOTAL
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
FRED -WORKSHOPS
300.00
CDNFfRENCE i SCHOOLS 101.4 2401.3320
251 00237
USA WASTE SERVICES, INC
SEPT
5,12.60
PROF SRV - REFUSE COLLEC 101.13230.3100
251 00235
OCT
5,161.21
PROF SRV - REFUSE COLLEC 101.13230.3100
251 00236
10,182.71
'VENDOR TOTAL
i ^ -IT 6 COMPANY
,TORN-TREE/CRUSH CLNUP
11,328.00
1097 STORM DAMAGE EXPERS 101.12501.1101
201 251 00218
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
CITY OF RONTICELLO
"/20/97 16:31:12
Schedule of Bills
GL510R401.30 PAGE 11
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE
P01 F/P ID LINE
VIKING COCA COU
LIQUOR -POP
888.85
MISC TAXABLE 609.19150.2510
251 00238
PW -POP
12.36
MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101./3110.1399
1151 00239
LIQUOR -TAXABLE RISC
363.15
MISC TAXABLE 609.19150.2540
251 00210
1,261.65
*VENDOR TOTAL
VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
MATER -LIFELINE
3,983.95
OTHER EQUIPMENT 602.19190.5801
251 00211
SEWAGE -GLOVES
62.21
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 601.19110.2111
251 00212
WATER -GLOVES
62.21
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 602.19190.2111
251 00.743
1,108.31
'VENDOR TOTAL
VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY COM
SUPPLIES
190.12
RISC REPAIR 6 MTC SUPPLI 609.1915/.2299
2005056
251 00211
WALTER'S CABINET SNOP
PW -REMODEL MACHINE CVR
38.00
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.13110.3199
1151 00219
WARNING LITES OF MIN
STREETS -REFLECTORS
231.11
SMALL TOOLS 8 EOUIPIIENT 101.13120.2110
1026131
251 00251
-SON COMPANY, INUTHE
ARABLE MISC
1,593.21
RISC TAXABLE 609.19150.2510
251 OD2511
FREIGHT
2.15
FREIGHT 609.19150.3330
251 00,153
GEN OP
111.11
RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.19151.2199
251 00251
1,109.80
'VENDDR TOTAL
NEST STAR ELECTRIC INC
AN SHELTER -200A SERVICE
1.891.00
BUILDINGS 101.12101.5201
251 00.155
WILSON DEVELOPMENT
HWY 25
2,332.00
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 150.19201.3199
251 00.156
COMMUNITY CENTER
010.50
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.11910.3199
251 00.151
3.112.50
-VENDOR TOTAL
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TR
TAX ROLL-TNNSHIP
15.21
PRINTED FORMS 6 PAPER 101.11520.2030
251 00259
SHERIFF PATROL
25.956.00
PROF SRV - UW ENFORCEME 101,12101.3050
NOVEMBER
251 00251
21,001.21
OVENDOR TOTAL
WRIGHT COUNTY DEPT OF HI
SALT 6 SAND
6,211.03
SAND 101.13125.2110
1916
251 00260
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
PRAIRIE W 2ND-TRAC7 SRCH
5.00
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.11910.3199
251 00261
y"1GHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELE
JHANON FARNS5
11.89
RISC OTHER EXPENSE 136.102D1.1399
251 00262
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
CITY OF MONTICELLO
1/20/97 16:34:42
Schedule of Bills
GL540R-VO4.30 PAGE 12
r
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE POO F/P ID LINE
BSB 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
LYMAN LUMBER PROP
22D.00
PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.43110.3030
251 00245
KJELLBERG POND
483.00
PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.43110.3030
251 00246
FAY-MAR TIF 17
132.00
PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 213.46517.3030
251 00247
GENERAL
520.00
PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.43110.3030
251 00246
1,355.00
-VENDOR TOTAL
Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPOLIS
CONTRACT
625.00
RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.45177.3199
NOVEMBER 251 00263
ZACK HALER
AN SHELTER-ZACK
50.00
RISC OTHER EXPENSE IDI.42701.4399
BARK COLLAR 251 00250
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
120/91 16:31:12
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS
Schedule of Bills
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT
103,816.53
RECORDS PRINTED - 000261
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GLSAOR-YO4.30 PAGE 13
CLAIM INVOICE PO3 F/P 10 LINE
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
/20/97 16:36:33 Schedule of Bills
FUND RECAP:
FUND DESCRIPTION DISBURSEMENTS
101
GENERAL FUND
111,361.85
211
LIBRARY FUND
606.22
213
NRA FUND
16,531.97
240
CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FO
791.63
262
SANITARY SEVER ACCESS FUND
2.037.50
253
STORM SEWER ACCESS FUND
4,094.39
265
WATER ACCESS FUND
1,018.75
435
93-14C WWTP DXPANSION PRJ
116,246.16
ASO
95-04C HWY25/NIDOT IMPR
21393.26
456
97-04C KLEIN FARMS PHASE 2
23,343.55
501
WATER FUND
6,629.14
602
SEWER FUND
39,983.97
609
MUNICIPAL LIDUOR FUND
33,230.46
510
TRANSPORTATION FUND
51929.98
651
RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
3.510.96
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 403,816.53
BANK RECAP:
BANK NAME
---- ----------------------------
DISBURSEMENTS
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
370.586.01
LIOR LIOUOR CHECAING
31,230.45
TOTAL ALL BANKS
403.015.53
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............ APPROVED BY .................................
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-VO4.30 RECAPPAGE
OL540R
.;I"" .1I 111,, l'm :\3hnun.n�wn
25o Ew Br,nid-ov MEMO
Mont icvII,,, MN 55162.1245
Ph,me:1(,12) 215.2711
Mow: (612) 331.57)1
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Rick Walfsteller, City Administr4�
DATE: November 19, 1997
HE: 1998 Budget Modifications
Attached you will find the budget summary sheets that have been modified to include the
changes discussed at our last budget workshop. The primary changes consisted of
reducing the Hillside Cemetery fence budget from $29,000 to $10,000, which resulted in a
savings of $19,000, along with the decision to reduce the amount of funds to be taken from
the liquor store reserves from $229,799 to approximately one-half of this amount, or
$115,000. These two amounts added up to $134,000, which is the amount that our
maximum tax levy was reduced by.
Another change you will note in the capital outlay category under city hall/community
center, phase I architectural design fees, is that I reduced the $164,799 previous estimate
to $70,000. The result of this reduction was that the capital outlay fund would have
$12.5,000 still available to be earmarked for some purpose that had not yet been designated
in the budget. With the Highway 25/Chelsea Road realignment project continuing on
schedule, it seemed appropriate to simply earmark the available funds for the City's share
of this improvement project, which I have added to this budget. This item does not
increase our tax levy needs, but it tentatively earmarks the funds for it project we have
planned.
In order to keep our general levy at its maximum allowed by the Department of Revenue,
we will be transferring $134,000 from our liquor fund reserves to it debt service bond
account. This preserves our higher levy limit should we ever need it in futum years.
Memo
Mayor and Council Members
November 19, 1997
Page 2
After making the changes discussed at the last workshop, the total dollar increase in our
levy amounts to $823,133, of which $627,785 is for debt purposes. The nondebt portion of
the budget increase would now be at $195,348, or approximately 6.38% more in dollars
than last year.
I've also revised the worksheet that compared taxes in 1997 to those proposed in 1998 for
various market values of commercial and residential properties. Many businesses and
residents will actually see a reduction in the property taxes even though the City needs to
raise more revenue for our wastewater treatment plant. Lower valued residential
properties will receive an increase as the example shows for a $65,000 house at 4.9%
increase. Overall, our increasing tax base and the additional state funding that the School
system is receiving through state aids is helping to keep the property taxes very close to
what they were in 1997.
If the Council is comfortable with the budget summary as modified and the proposed tax
levy of $3,883,013 ($134,000 lower than the maximum allowed), the need for additional
workshop discussion may not be necessary, and we can simply proceed with presenting
this information at the budget hearing Wednesday, December 3, at 5 p.m. As a reminder,
the Council would still have the option of restoring any proposed levy cuts you have made
or make additional reductions if you should so choose at the December 3 budget hearing.
After the initial hearing is held, the final budget and levy amount would need to be
adopted at our regular meeting December 8.
TAX LEVY SUMMARY
1998 BUDGET
ALL FUNDS
Net Payable Net Payable
1997 Adjusted Levy Before 1998 Adjusted
Levy After RACA Adj. Levy After
FLLIId Dedurf:ne HACA Payable 1998 HACA T)Pd,,rfino HACA
General
$1,967,526
$2,467,950
$259,157
$2,208,793
Library
31,095
31,095
0
31,095
Transportation
14,604
16,612
0
16,612
Shade Tree
0
0
0
0
OAA
977
2,175
0
2,175
HRA
12,966
14,795
0
14,795
Debt Service
557,575
1,098,807
0
1,098,807
Capital Imp. Revolving
475.137
510.736
Q
510.736
TOTAL
$3,059,880
$4,142,170
$259,157
93,883,013
Net Levy Increase to Cover Debt -
Net Levy Increase for Non -debt Portion of Budget -
Net Certified Levy Increase -
Payable 1989 Tax Capacity Rate .....
14.283
Payable 1990 Tax Capacity Rate .....
16.187
Payable 1991 Tax Capacity Rate .....
15.511
Payable 1992 Tax Capacity Rate .....
16.492
Payable 1993 Tax Capacity Rate .....
16.313
Payable 1994 Tax Capacity Rate .....
17.527
Payable 1995 Tax Capacity Rate .....
18.228
Payable 1996 Tax Capacity Rate .....
18.509
Payable 1997 Tax Capacity Rate .....
19.136
Est. Payable 1998 Tax Capacity Rate.
26.940
Tax Tax
$627,785 20.52% increase
195.348 6.38' increase
$823,133 26.90`1
'88/Payable 1989
$ 15,405,139
14.283
$2,198,008
'89/Payable 1990
15,873,242
16.187
2,568,106
'90/Payable 1991
16,161,043
15.511
2,506,132
'91/Payable 1992
15,613,574
16.492
2,558,554
'92/Payable 1993
16,490,600
16.308
2,526216
'93/Payable 1994
15,154,786
17.527
2,652,527
'94/1'ayable 1995
15,586,930
18.228
2,841,185
'95/Payable 1996
15,792,922
18.509
2,922,800
'96/Payable 1997
15,993,989
19.136
3,059,880
'97/1'ayable 1998 (est.)
14,413,597
26.940
3,883,013
97BUDGET V1497 PAGE t t
970UDGET. 111"7 PAGE 101
CAPITAL OUTLAY ITEMS
1898 BUDGET
FUND/
FUNDING
DEPARTMENT
ITEM
AMOUN
SOURCE
Administration:
File cabinets:
(2) basement
(1) administration
(1) utility billing
(1) assessing
$ 9,000
General Fund
Microfilm reader/printer
14,000
General Fund
Plan holder
�,2QQ
General Fund
$ 26,200
Deputy
Registrar:
Typewriter table
$ 150
General Fund
Parks:
FGein Farms Park improvements
$ 40,000
Capital Outlay
Pathway - Ellison Park to Miss. Dr.
15,000
Capital Outlay
Prairie Creek Park improvements
3,500
General Fund
Add'l ballfields (3) - NSP Park Ost half)
40,000
Capital Outlay
Freeway Park - parking lot (2nd half)
13,000
General Fund
River/Bridge Park enhancements -
MCP initiatives
60,000
Capital Outlay
Hillside Cemetery wrought iron
fence 438,500 less'94 budgeted
amount of $9,500) (balance in 1999)
10,000
General Fund
Picnic tables
4,000
General Fund
Mowers (2) - (1) replacement
(1) new
25,790
General Fund
Pickup, 2 -wheel drive
16,000
Genera, Fund
Dump truck with plow, 1 ton, 4x4
38,000
General Fund
Hard surface 4th St. ice rink
(skate boarders) & play structure
improvements
40,000
Capital Outlay
Adopt -a -park seed $ for volunteers
5.000
Capital Outlay
$316,290
Liquor:
Carpet replacement
$ 7,000
Liquor Fund
Intercom headphones
300
Liquor Fund
Enlarge refuse/cardboard storage
(outside)
1.000
Liquor Fund
$ 8,300
Library:
Unallocated
$ 11000
Library Fund
970UDGET. 111"7 PAGE 101
CAPITAL OUTLAY ITEMS
1998 BUDGET
FUND/
DFP�NT
ITEM
�� T
FUNDING
RQURCE
HRA:
Downtown Revitalization Study
(final payment)
S 30,000
HRA Fund
Future industrial park land
acquisition - Reserve (2nd yr)
(contingent upon City matching funds)
75,000
HRA Fund
Funding partial land acquisition
along river
35.000
Capital Outlay
8140,000
Fire Dept.:
Unallocated - unspecified
8 10,000
General Fund
Shade Tree:
Boulevard tree planting program
(8900 ® 825 each)
8 22.500
Tree Fund
Reserves
General reforestation - matching
grant assistance
25,000
Tree Fund Res.
8 47,500
Data Processing:
Main frame computer - updating
AS(400 lease (annual)
8 28,000
General Fund
PC - motor vehicle
2,500
General Fund
PC's (4) -city hall
10,000
General Fund
PC - public works
2,500
General Fund
PC - microfilm
3,500
General Fund
Cash register - motor vehicle
1,000
General Fund
Printers (2)- city hall
2,600
General Fund
Network - city hall
3.000
General Fund
8 53,100
City Hall:
New city hall
8410,000
Liquor Reserves
400.000
Capital Outlay
8810,000
Reserves
Community Center:
Phase I - orchitectural design fees
70.000
Capital Outlay
8880,000
Fconomic
Development:
MCP contribution
8 35,000
Capital Outlay
Future industrial park land
acquisition - 2nd yr - reserve
(matching contrib. of HRA)
75,000
Capital Outlay
Develop marketing program for
business/industry
38.000
General Fund
8145,000
978UDGE7 111"7
PAGE 102
CAPITAL OUTLAY ITEMS
1998 BUDGET
FUND/
D .P RTMRNT ITE
Public Works
Administration: File cabinets (2)
Postage machine rental and
electronic scale
Public Works
Inspections:
Street Dept.:
Snow/Ice:
Refuse:
WWTP:
Sewer Dept.:
Cemetery:
Water Dept.
Planning:
Desk and filing cabinet
4" Trash pump
Radios ® $550 ea (4 )
Tamper
Jackhammer
5000 watt generators (2) (signal lights)
Sealcoating program
Bobcat
1/3 of cold planer
Hwy 25/Chelsea Rd realignment
(partial)
Snowplows (2)
Rental garbage carts (250)
Radio
Administration big. furniture
and fixtures
1/3 of new jet rodder/vac - reserve
(1/6 budgeted in 1997)
Jetting nozzle
Rebuild jet rodder
Sewer line TV camera
Cemetery management software
Equipment storage building -
Purchase or building reserve
Water Resource Management Plan
AMO{
S 800
900
$ 1,400
$ 1,500
$ 3,200
2,200
1,000
1,000
8,000
27,500
27,000
6.000
S 75,900
$125,000
$ 10,000
$ 15,000
S 550
7.500
$ 8,050
$ 50,000
2,'200
2,500
10-000
$ 64,700
5 600
ffi 65,000
5 40,000
FUNDING
SOURCE
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
Capital Outlay
General Fund
General Fund
Sewer Fund
WWTP Const.
Fund
Capital Outlay
Sewer Fund
Sewer Fund
Sewer Fund
Cemetery Fund
Water Access
Fund Reserves
Storm Sewer
Access Fund
97euoGer VU97 PAGE 103
FUN
General
Library
Transportation
Shade Tree
UDAG
OAA
HRA
EDA
SCERG
CMIF
Debt Service
Liquor
Water
Sewer
Cemetery
Capital Imp.
Water Access
Storm Sewer Access
Sewer Access
TOTAL
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
1998 BUDGET
1332
RF.VENITF F.XPFNDITITRFS
$2,876,200
$2,876,200
32,295
32,295
69,635
69,635
6,900
20,725
12,840
59,000
1,600
1,600
515,960
596,000
215,740
2,120
5,555
124,000
120
0
1,499,090
1,688,973
1,828,650
1,643,350
218,305
418,740'•
563,800
969,435•
0
0
579,948
579,950
74,900
10,000
25,000
0
$8,728,958 $9,092,023
• includes $619,450 Depreciation --contributed assets sewer
•• includes $201,100 Depreciation --contributed assets water
1338
REVENUE EXPENDITURE
$3,259,995
$ 3,259,995
32,295
32,295
72,030
72,030
8,550
71,430
4,690
0
2,900
2,900
438,800
402,555
35,880
2,120
5,740
0
120
0
2,000,685
1,816,042
2,017,450
1,892,175
246,900
425,325
622,020
1,203,355
24,200
31,550
591,676
590,000
80,720
65,000
80,560
40,000
$9,849,651 $ 9,906,772
WauDGiET, IM"? PAGE 10
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
1998 BUDGET
REVENUE
Tames
1248
188T
Current Ad Valorem
$2,467,950
$2,137,625
Penalty/Interest
1,000
100
Tax Increments --Kmart
84.300
86.050
Licenses Permits. Business
$2,553,250
$2,223,775
and
Liquor
24,900
24,900
Beer
1,025
1,030
Set Ups
300
325
Licensee Permits Non-Btsaineas
$ 26,225
$
26,255
and -
Building Permits
152,000
150,000
Variances/Conditional Uses
2,000
2,500
Dog Licenses
125
125
Others
5.100
5.050
In
$ 159,225
$
157,675
er .nv m n nl
Fire Department Aid
46,000
34,900
Police Department Aid
22,000
25,000
State Highway Aid
41-000
_
1.000
C.hnrgea for Services
$ 108,000
$
100,900
General Government
1,000
1,000
Public Safety (Township Contract)
65,360
60,970
Streets - C.S.A.H. Mtnc.
7,700
6,600
Deputy Registrar
110,000
105,000
Other
675
650
Subdivision Fees
7,500
6,000
Special Processing Fee (Garbage)
15,000
15,000
Recycling Incentive
12,000
12,000
Inspection Fees
25,000
5,000
Garbage Cart Rental
8.000
8.000
$ 252,235
$
217,220
Fined
Animal Impoundment
15.000
18.000
Miarellnneo Rav
$ 15,000
$
18,000
ra n e
Interest on Investments
121,435
103,625
Sale of Property
325
350
Other & Rental of Property
9.300
13.500
Re Wimh
$ 131,060
$
117,375
Anda nnd ura menta
Other Reimbursements
15.000
16.000
$ 15,000
S
16,000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE
$3.259,995
$2,876,200
l iF:NVUNDRAUM : 1111"7
GENERAL FUND SUdIIMARY
1998 BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
L%"
1$91
Mayor and Council
$ 32,450
$ 30,425
Administration
306,575
236,000
Finance
102,080
100,990
Insurance
63,915
63,470
Audit
13,600
13,500
Legal
47,500
28,000
Planning & Zoning
166,085
109,885
Inspections -Bldg. Official
163,415
163,905
Assessing
16,550
15,900
Deputy Registrar
108,820
98,665
City Hall
44,185
34,980
Computer
75,675
36,260
Elections
5.600
0
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
$1,136,250
$ 930,980
Law Enforcement
$ 333,326
$ 323,475
Fire
172,210
140,565
Civil Defense
9,345
8,710
Animal Control
38.060
34100
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY
$ 552,930
$ 506,850
Inspection
$ 90,775
$ 43,640
Admin. & Engineering
133,140
126,090
Streets & Alleys
326,650
308,326
Snow & fee
60,720
97,710
Street Lighting & Parking Lots
67,700
62,760
Shop & Garage
37,850
37,050
Refuse Collection
96,111On321-666
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
$ 978,835
$ 997,020
Senior Citizens Center
{ 37,000
If 37,000
YMCA/Community Ed.
25,000
25,000
Information Center7Museum
1.696
1.690
TOTAL HEALTH & WELFARE
{ 63,695
{ 63,690
Parke & RocJCemetery
S 368 240
It 242410
TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION
$ 358,240
$ 242,410
Community Development
11 159"045
A 124 2F;Q
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
$ 169,045
If 124250
Misc.--Severence Benefits
6 11-000
S 1L000
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS
$ 11,000
$ 11,000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
$3259,995
$2,876200
GFNFUNI)E,SUM: 1 V INN?
SUMMARY
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
1998 BUDGET FORECAST
Current ad valorem: 605,022 1,098,807
Interest: 91,780 95,255
Special aamt--county: 506,788 389,638
Transfer in --tax increment: 295,500 282,985
Transfer in—Liquor fund: 0 134.000
TOTAL REVENUE
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr►rrrrrrrgrurrrrrrrgrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr•
EXPENDITURES
Principal: 1,180,000 1,375,000
Interest: 486,291 415,966
Paying agent fees: 8,182 7,326
Interest exp.: 14.500 17.750
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1 1 Q4$
MUDGET. 1/1407 PAGE 64
LEVY LIMIT COMPARISONS
1997 vs. 1998
im im inerae9'
Non -debt Related Levy $2,454,858 $2,650,206 $195,348
• This amounts to a 6.38% increase in dollars to be collected to fund normal
increases and for additional programs or services proposed.
LEINUMT OOM 1111"7
1,282
im
General Levy (Limit)
$2,769,607
$3,100,714
Add: Debt Levy
+ 605,022
+1,098,807
Subtract: State Aids (HACA)
- 314.749
- 316,508
PROPOSED LEVY
$3,059,880
$3,883,013
im im inerae9'
Non -debt Related Levy $2,454,858 $2,650,206 $195,348
• This amounts to a 6.38% increase in dollars to be collected to fund normal
increases and for additional programs or services proposed.
LEINUMT OOM 1111"7
u
SUMMARY OF PROJECTED REVENUES, EXPENDITURES
AND FUND BALANCES (CASH 8 INVESTMENTS)
PROJREV: 11/18/87
PROJECTED
1998
1998
PROJECTED
BALANCE
PROJECTED
PROJECTED
BALANCE
FUND
12/31197
REVENUE
EXPFNDITURFS
12/31/98
General
$2,558,725
$3,259,995
$3.259,995
$2,558,725
Library
$7.975
$32,295
$32,295
$7,975
Tree
$127,845
$8.550
$71,430
$64,965
OAA
$10,530
$2.900
$2.900
$10,530
Water
$148,320
$246,900
$224,225
$170,995
Water Access
$341,515
$60,720
$65,000
$357,235
Sewer
$124,875
$622,020
$583,905
$162,990
Sewer Access
$544,875
$324,440
$0
$869,315
Transportation
$1,100
$72,030
$72,030
$1,100
Liquor
$39F,200
$2,017,450
$1,892.175
$521,475
Capital Outlay Revolving
$403,368
$591,676
$590.000
$405,044
HRA
$42,635
$438.800
$402,555
$78,880
UDAG
$112,460
$4.690
$0
$117,150
EDA
$150,820
$35.880
$2,120
$184,580
SCERG
$3,095
$5.740
$0
$8,835
CMIF
$420
$120
$0
$540
Storm Sewer Access
$25,000
$80,560
$40.000
$65,560
Cemetery
529.800
524,200
531550
522450
SUBTOTALS
$5,029,558
$7,848,966
$7,270.180
$5,608,344
Debt Service
General Obligation Bonds
$721,205
$828.904
$230,700
$1,319.09
Special Assessment Bonds
$2,188,309
$869,646
$1,268,380
$1,789,575
Tax Increment Bonds
111.116
$284.315
5299212
193'1111
SUBTOTALS
$2,921,230
$1,982,935
$1,798292
$3,105.873
TOTALS
$7,950.788
$9,831.901
$9,068.472
$8,714,217
PROJREV: 11/18/87
PRELIMINARY
ESTIMATES OF VALUES FOR TAXES
PAYABLE 1998
City: Market value
+5.0%
$495,397.800
Tax capacity value
-10.0%
$14,413.597
Proposed tax levy
.26.9%
$3,883,013
Tax caoacity rate
.40.7%
26.940
School: Market value (W.C. only)
-6.6%
$739,857,500
Tax capacity value
-7.6%
$17,666.138
Proposedlevy
-12.0%
$11,176.934
Tax capacity rate
-9.5%
57.99
Market value rate
0.05869
WrIpM County: Market value
+9.0%
$3,537,922.100
Tax capacity value
-1.4%
$57,403.648
Proposed levy
+5.5%
$17,663,676
Tax caoaclty rate
.7.0%
30.771
Hospital Diatrlot: Market value (W.C. only)
+6.7%
$926.727,500
Tax capacity value
-5.6%
$20,044.519
Proposed levy
-1.7%
$481,269
Tax capacity rate
+5.0%
2.401
TOTAL 1998 PRELIMINARY TAX CAPACITY RATE
118.102
1997 TAX CAPACITY RATE
112.818
OVERALL % INCREASE IN TAX CAPACITY RATE
4.87%
valuetax.wk4: 11/18/97
Tax Comparison by
Property Class & Value
1997 vs. 1998
im i
% Increase
EMV
$750,000
EMV
$750,000
Assessed Value
32,900
A.V.
28,050
Taxes
37,051
Taxes
33,127
-(10.67)%
EMV
$150,000
EMV
$150,000
Assessed Value
5,300
A.V.
4,050
Taxes
5,969
Taxes
4,783
-(19.8)8:
Residential Homestead:
EMV
$65,000
EMV
$ 65,000
Assessed Value
650
A.V.
650
Taxes
732
Taxes
768
+ 4.9%
EMV
$75,000
EMV
$ 75,000
Assessed Value
780
A.V.
750
Taxes
878
Taxes
886
+0.9%
EMV
$85,000
EMV
$ 85,000
Assessed Value
980
A.V.
935'
Taxes
1,104
Taxes
1,104
No change
EMV
$130,000
EMV
$130,000
Assessed Value
1,880
A.V.
1,767
Taxes
2,117
Taxes
2,087
-(1.4'%)
EMV
$200,000
EMV
$200,000
Assessed Value
3,280
A.V.
3,062
Taxes
3,694
Taxes
3,616
-(2.1%)
C.\4 IVPICK\Nil! K\TAX XI MP. RM
Budget Year 1998
(Based on a total levy increase of 26.9% in dollars
with a non -debt levy increase of 6.381/6)
The effect of budget increases or decreases on the proposed:
Budget Effect on
General Fund
+$383,795
+$241,267
Library Fund
$0
$0
Transportation
+$2,395
+$2,008
Tree
+$50,705
$0
OAA
+$1,300
+$1,198
HRA
-$193,445
+$1,829
Debt Service
+$127.069
+$541,232
Capital Outlay Fund
+$10.050
+$35,599
EDA Fund
$0
$0
UDAG
-$59,000
$0
Liquor
+$248.825
$0
Water Fund
+$6.585
$0
Sewer Fund
+$233,920
$0
Water Access Fund
+S55,000
$0
Storm Sewer Access
$40,000
$0
Sewer Access Fund
$0
$0
SCERG
-$124.000
$0
CMIF
$0
$0
Cemetery
=$3.1.550
_$Q
TOTALS --ALL FUNDS
+$814,749
+$823,133
levylncr.wk4: 11/19/97
11
Tax Burden for a $80,000 Monticello Home
Taxes Payable 1997 to 1998 1
$1,200
$1,000
$800
$600
$400 $227
$168
$200
so
�ff 0
Cay
TAXBURD.WK4: 11/20/97
$995 $993
Fo 1998 0 -19-97 1
Tow
Composition of the Proposed 1998 Total Tax Rate
For the City of Monticello
so
57.990
60
m
m
o:
IT 10
1
20
County City School Spacial
Total 1998 Tai Rate: 118.102
TAXRATE. WK4: 11/20/97
r.
_J
Average Proposed Monticello Property Tax Bill
Where the Tax Dollars Go --Pay 1998
County
(49.1%) SChool
TAXBILL. WK4: 11/20/97
City
(2 011.) Special