Loading...
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 07-10-1984AGENDA .� REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION July 10, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. Members: Jim Ridgeway, Joyce Dowling, Richard Carlson, Don Cochran, Ed Schaffer. 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 7:32 P.M. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held June 12, 1984. 7:34 P.M. 3. Public Hearing - Conditional Use Requoot to Allow More than a 12 -unit Apartment Building in an R-3 Zone, Applicant - Construction 5, Inc. 7:49 P.M. 4. Public Hearing - Ordinance Amendment to Allow as a Conditional Use a Boarding House in a B-4 Zone, Applicant - City of Monticello. 8:04 P.M. 5. Public Hearing - Conditional Use Requoot to Allow a Boarding House in a B-4 Zone, Applicant - Thomas Hommor. 8:19 P.M. 6. Simple Subdivision Request to Subdivide a Residential Lot for Driveway Purposes, Applicant - Monticello -Big Lake Community Hoopital. 8:26 P.M. 7. Public Hearing - Conditional Use Requoot to Allow an Ambularco Garage to be Built in an R-1 Zone, Applicant - Monticollo-Big Lake Community Hoopital. 8:33 P.X. 6. Simplo Subdivision Request to Subdivide Reoidential Multi -family Acreage, Applicant - Ed Doran. 8:46 P.M. 9. Preliminary Roqueot to Rezone a Prop000d Preliminary Plot Approved Subdivinion, Applicant - John Sandberg. Additional Information Items 9:03 P.M. 1. Key Tool presentation of proposal for now building. 9:06 P.M. 2. Sot a data for the next Planning Commiooion Work Scop lon on the Comprehensive Plan, preferably oomotimo before July 27, 1984. 9:13 P.M. 3. Sot the next tentative data for the Monticello Planning Commission Mooting for August 14, 1984, 7:30 P.M. 9:18 P.M. 4. Adjournment. MI14UTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLAN14ING COMMISSION June 12, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. Mambas Present: Jam Ridgeway, Richard Carlson, Joyce Dowling, Dun Cochran, Ed Schaffer. Members Absent: None. Staff Present: Gary Anderson. The meeting was called to order by President Jim Ridgeway at 7:43 P.M. Motion by Ed Schaffer, seconded by Don Cochran to approve the May 8, 1984, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Public Hearing - Variance Request to Allow Expansion of a Non -conforming Use in an R-1 Zone, Applicant - Phil Ritze. Phil Ritze, representing his father, Charles Ritze, owner of the property in the Variance Request, was present to discuss his proposal to be allowed to build an accessory building in excess of 1,000 sq. ft. Mr. Rttzo explained the building would be 401021 and would be built back in along aide the trees which surround the building site on the cast and south aides. The building would be colored metal on the walls and the roof and the doors. He intends to put some shrubbery around the building and also some decorative rock on the entrance to the bui Id Ing. He nluo indicatud ho would like to put split real tenting around the drivrw,�y entianco to the proposed building. Mr. Ritze cmphaoi.ed the 1>,int of his Variance Requoot to to put nome of the equipment that 1u currently otored outside into hit, building, thus climinating any uutsido storage of equipamat, therefoao, cieantug up the whole area which exists thmD now. lie indicated he has already been progroosing on that and closning up the area, having removed some equipment and building and equipment debits. Chairman Jim Ridgeway called for any public input, with no public present with any input. Chairman Ridgeway questioned Zoning Administrator Gary Anderson as to whether he had received any phone calla from the public on this. Andorson indicated he had received approximately four or five calls on the property. People were mostly concerned because they did not know what the property woo and wanted to know what was going on the property, what was to be built. Anderson Indicated to them it would be a detached acconoory building, with people indicating they see no problem with that. - I - v Planning Commission Minutes 6/12/84 Their biggest concern was that they thought there as a possibility of an apartment building going in there and increasing numbers of people and traffic flow already existing. Commission members heard comments from Mr. Ritze and questions countered to Mr. Ritze and Zoning Administrator Anderson. Motion by Don Cochran, seconded by Joyce Dowling, to approve the Variance Request to Mr. Charles Ritze, owner of the property, to allow an accessory building to be bailt in exe ess of 1,000 sq. it. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Public Hearing - Conditional Use Request to Build a 4-plex in an R-2 Zone, Applicant - Tom Chock. Mr. Chock was present to explain his proposal for building a 4-plex in an R-2 Zone, indicating on the map which was received by Planning Commission membeta as to the location of his proposed 4-plex on the building lot and also the gatages and parking lot on the proposed building lot. Chairman Ridgeway asked if there was any input from the public on this. Mr. Lonn Olson, the adjoining neighbor to the west of the proposed 4-plox location, questioned the setbacks, the amount of feet that was needed, between building lots and buildings and the front and rear yard setbacks. He also questioned as to the location of the garage on the, proponed lot and the nothaeks for thio_ Zoning Administrator Anderson countered with the 10, aideyard setback, 30' front and rear yard setback, and also the 5' aide and rest lot setbacks for the garage. Mr. Olson noted to Commis:.ion members that he did not ohject to Mi. Chock's 4-plux proposal but would like to ooe additional room hetween hin lot line and the proposed 4-plex. Mi. Chock indicated he could move the building over farther to accommodate more aideyard ootback it Planning Co®iunion co ehnooeo. Motion by Don Cochran,-,occ>nded by Joyce bowlinrt, to approve the Conditional Uon ftmpuoat to build a 4 plex in an 1-2 Zone with ons condition bninij a 15' Jideyoid i.otl,ack im,t-id of a 10' sidoyard oetbaCk on the wool Lido r,I thy• I r,gx,:.rl 4 -IA - 5. Puhlic Huatinq - Cundition,il tlr.o R,.,lunuL to Alluw Ou_t_dr of .',ilni and Outdoor Storage in a H-3 Zonn , Aj pll,m r -t_ M"Itr, 'n F'.ii rti SetwiCa. ---- - --- Mr. Rune Mattio woo ptccent to pi t.p, uc hi,, tnqut-1 t;, allow him to have out.oide i,alen and out[Ado is-a,,lo In a 1+-3 Zone. Mr. Martio Indicated he worild like to sill whito ccd,ii pxrotc from the rear portion of hlo lot tcm,rllately wot.t of the rkiating building site and also to ho allowed to have an outuido liquid otorago tank to sell llquicl ptototn out of. Com.-nicnion nictahein queotionod Mr. Martin It he wao awaro of Lho cCLeeninq which would be nooded. Mi. Mat tie indirated he was not aware of lh.it. - 2 - Planning Commission Minutes - 6/12/84 Commission members questioned Zoning Administrator Anderson as to what type of fence he would have to have. Zoning Administrator Anderson indicated to Commission members that he would have to have a privacy type fence around the area to be used for sales lot and/or outside storage, with one exception being on the west side of the sales and storage lot, that being immediately adjacent to Marvin Road, that being left open to allow Mr. Martie to load and unload cedar posts and also to load and unload liquid protein from the proposed liquid storage tank to be placed immediately west of his existing building. Motion by Don Cochran, seconded by Richard Carlson, to approve the Conditional Use Request to allow outdoor sales in a B-3 Zone with the condition that Mr. Martie construct a privacy fence a minimum of 6' high and no more than 8' high on the westerly side of his building and on the north and south ends of his outdoor sales lot with the westerly end of his sales lot being left open adjacent to the Marvin Road. Motion by Juyc'c Dowling, cocoodud by Don Cuchran, to approve the outdoor' r,torage in a 11-3 i:om'. Motion carried unanimously. Public Heating - Valiance Request to Erect a larger Pylon Sign than the Maximum Sign Square Footage Allowed, Applicant - First National Rank. Mr. Tum Pogatchnik, partner in the new Firut National Bank undur construction, was before Planning Commission members with a request for a 22 sq. 1t. aign variance to bo allowed to arect a pylon sign of 72 sq. it. where Ordinance allows only 50 sq. ft. of sign area. Mr. Pogatchnik indicated to Commission members that it is not merely just an ordinary pylon sign. It does reflect the bank's eolorit, and there would be no exposed posts supporting the pylon sign. It would be the same brick type exterior that Is currently on the newly under construction bank building. Mr. Pogatchnik purely cited the need for the additional square feet to contrast with the design and size of the newly under construction bank building. Planning Commission Chairman Jim Ridgeway asked it there was any input from the public on it. Mi. Clifford Olson explained that he had no uhjectiono to the bank'o sign variance proposal but that ho is an adjacr.nt property owner directly across the street. and would like the same treatment should any development occur on his building alto with the proponed develolment needing a vacianru for additional oign arca. - J - Planning Commission Minutes - 6/12/84 Taking the comments into consideration, motion war made by Don Cochran, seconded by Fd Schaffer to deny the Variance Request to be allowed an additional 22 sq. ft. of sign area for the proposed new pylon sign. Additional Information Items 1 . Previously Tabled Variance Request to Allow rlo Curbing in Certain Areas of Parking Lot, Applicants - Jay Morrell and John Plaisted. Mr. Jay Morrell, representing himself and his partner, John Plaisted, was present to discuss with Commission members not having curbing in certain areas of his parking lot.. He indicated to Commission members that the parking lot is no designed that any water runoff from the parking lot is sloped to the middle of the parking lot with the drainage of water flowing to the southeast corner of the parking lot into the State Highway 25 drainage ditch. Mr. Morrell indicated that there in ample room for semi -truck tractors and trailers to bring in feud and/or seed quantities to be loaded or unloaded at the loading dock site and still be able to back the trailer in completely on the hares surfacing. Mr. Morrell also indicated to Commission members in which areas of the parking lot he would like no curbing, thono txing along Marvin Rnari, no curbing along the south side of the paved lot, no curbing along the (nut uide of the paved lot. Taking those oteao into consideration, notion by lion Cochran, ascended by Joyce Dowling, to approve ri: curbinq in certain areas of the parking lot except curbing be inatolled on the northwout edge of the parking lot 33 feat in lino with the building and in the northeaclt corner of the parkhi•3 lot 30 foot in line with the building olid th(n uouthorIy a3 ung the oast aide of the paved parking lot for a distance e+f 20 toot. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Planning Commission Discussion - Allowing Apartmonts in a 0-4 Zone. Zoning Administrator Andaroon indicated to Planning Coramionion members that City Administrator Tum Eidem had mat with City Attorney Gary Pringle to discuses the Tom lmmmai Conditional Use Requoot. Andorcon indicated to Commiunion memberu that they aro looking at drafting an Ordinance Amendment allowing boarding rooms in a B-4 Zone as a Conditional Use with eundltions attached. 3. Mottoes by Ed Schattcr,coconded by Richard Carlton, to t)et Lite next 'entative date tui the Monticollo Planning Conumic:nlon let July 10, 1704, 1:3U P.M. Motlon by Ed !',Choi let, c."runded by Hichard Cor loon to adjourn t Ire r., rt lug. The t.- Lrn.l aijuunttd al 9:30 P.M. Rer.pecttul Iy culnittrd, X 6.. Gory Anndersro o den�'Ltt�Gi�' _. O n Zoning Adminintratot Planning Commission Agenda - 7/10/84 3. Public Hearing - Conditional Use Request to Allow More than a 12 -unit Apartment Building in an R-3 Zone, Applicant - Construction 5, Inc. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Construction 5 is proposing to build another 24 -unit apartment building in between the existing 12 -unit apartment building built last fall and the current 24 -unit apartment building under construction. The site area of the property is 68,059 sq. ft. Construction 5 is proposing to build 18 two-bedroom and 6 one -bedroom units, therefore, needing 63,000 sq. ft. of land area. Therefore, they will have an excess of site area of 5,059 sq. ft. There will be 16 garage spaces with 32 open off-street parking spaces, with two of those open parking spaces for handicapped parking. The proposed 24 -unit apartment building and the parking lot and the proposed 16 -stall garage will meet or exceed the setback requirements in an R-3 Zone. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the Conditional Use Request to allow more than a 12 -unit apartment building in an R-3 Zone. 2. Deny the Conditional Use Request to allow more than a 12 -unit apartment building in an R-3 Zone. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Request to allow more than a 12 -unit apartment building, in this case a 24 -unit apartment building with 18 two-bedroom units and 6 one -bedroom unite with 16 -stall garage and 32 off-street parking spaces, with two of those spaces for the handicapped. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the proposed location of the proposed 24 -unit apartment building; Copy of the alto plan; Copy of Consulting Engineering Firm -o IOSM) comments on the site plan of the proposed 24 -unit apartment building. - 1 - NV � • X. � � � •_Ir = 1 cam.) '!' \ Conditional Uaa Raquwt to allow aw,a than a 11 -unit apartmanl--ywlldl • - - - w -• .� ,n an 11-3 Zane. •� \ rConettuction s, Inc 0 - CONSTUCT CoE• SPILLWAY Ok �-� _l Concrete Curb CO , OD I �0) 1 I I (n T O.O�, w - i / C f I I 1 d � I U-1� ° I I I n I I 1 HANDICAP- RAMP bETAIL — I! ° I I c O \ °q�til•o i L7� 1 Q- •. � / 1 � � �cn l � o I ao � � 5 Ft., Concrete Sidewa V F �. 1 OI Proposed 2Q Unit / I � I I Apartment Building I � ',x-30 0 MIdQ•_� ._ ZO_ - 1 I st F)Qpr1 EI. I / 0 0 �* 1948:00 I I �o M-E,�iG HC = m II NIIICAP RAMP DETAIL NC T .., 2J nQy�l '' 33 I 1 Ck'�' SIXTH �y":`"'"' °- �'" �•�'" STREET . _FIFTH STREET I Ld W CIOF— 21 ORR•SCHELEN • MAYERON Et ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors June 20, 1984 Mr. Gary Anderson Zoning Administrator City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, MM 55362 Re: Site Plan, Construction 5, Inc. Monticello, Minnesota Dear Gary: The site plan for the Construction 5, Inc. second building addition recently sent to me and dated 6/4/84, has been reviewed by our office, and I offer the following comments regarding the drainage 1 ayout. The parking area drainage seems to be in order, and positive drainage from the site should be accomplished. I do, however. have a couple of recommendations that the developer and his engineer should consider. I did not note this before, but the concrete curb is a straight V6 type design which has a tendency to settle in filled areas and also is susceptible to turning over if hit hard by an auto tire. I would recommend that 8618 curb and gutter be used in lieu of the V6 curb design. The additional cost of the curb and gutter compared to the possibility of replacement of the V6 curb due to placement on fill (in some cases 5') and the possibility of overturning may offset the additional cost required for curb and gutter. Another recommendation is that the easterly proposed garage floor elevation be at 948.3 instead of elevation 948.0. This will act as a safeguard against parking area runoff entering the proposed garage. C-3) 2021 East Hcnrrepin Avenue • Suito 238 . Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 • 6121331-8660 Page Two Mr. Gary Anderson June 20, 1984 Other than the comments above, I foresee no problems with drainage if the site is graded according to plan and therefore recommend approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Yours very truly, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON • A' SSOCIATES, 1N JohnPP... BBaaaddalich, P.E. \ VCity Engineer JPB:nlb Enclosure cc: Bob Rohlin, Meyer-Rohlin, Inc. ORR-SCHEIEN •MAYERON &ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors Mr. Gary Anderson Building Official City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Meadow Oak 3rd Addition Dear Gary: November 14, 1983 The preliminary plat of Meadow Oak 3rd Addition was received by our office on November 10, 1983. My staff has reviewed the plat as to its conformance with Section 10-20-1 of Monticello City Ordinance, Chapter 20 relating to Planned Unit Developments. This is a replat of Outlot G, Meadow Oak, to Meadow Oak 3rd Addition. All requirements for general development, grading, utilities, land- scape and building setback have already been reviewed and approved ' under the Meadow Oak Plat. This review, therefore, deals basically with dimensions and required casements. Our comments are as follows. 1. The boundary agrees with the dimensions of Outlot G, Meadow Oak. 2. The mathematics of the plat, as to closure, will be checked by the County Surveyor's Office. 3. The lot dimensions agree as nearly as possible with the pre- liminary plat of Meadow Oak which showed this area and the lots for manufactured homes. 4. The utility easements have been provided and shown on the plat as required. Therefore, based on our review, we recommend approval of the plat as submitted. Yours very truly, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON PPASSOCIATES, INC. . Badalich, P.E. City Engineer JPH:nlb Enclosure cct Thoma© Eidom, City Administrator McCombe -Knutson Associates, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue . Suito 238 . Minneapolis. Minnesota 55413 . 6121331- 8660 1 t 10 ca{1 $VINf3a'3T' t7° 7S7i S9'73i 1 57.86 �_J 1 L -j 92.95 o i ( r 4 � f13.9s` 117 � � t �' = W C' 1'73.75 Transomen� prr h-leXa269626' i_ _ -�-r i t , o I NJ i1'' tO Ai O ro w1 18 'p1 1 im °'�f `v i I^i I' g m 6 1 io + n 8^t 2 kip; 1i fa�• -t f.13 m 7 u^'�v' die• ` F •t� 6•Gj6t•02•J LA V ' i t ib•3•56'00'� y.; 'CO' t y'r 1.-•�t- \--- ,'•, o" ` y� �` ��.61.32 , r--ss.00 J I_ 70.00- L c. T0.4s 1 _C.�Tooe —i �. e3.Ts 1, i �-` " ow. J' .e, ti L+ 70.46 � 26 5 53- E -<4,1 t• t g0•bt► m �u ty IT 30 t: r1 o.0 , er . `� a - - �,- N 1,tO Sgt 30•f+DAle R•t051.36L t+ g3 ,0:�.�p0 ,, • 151.42 Ni 12�. p0 10.52' 00• L • 194.4.9. '4' .ii~ Zy• �t4.99.!3 �•t430.OT 46,95 ey _." _ ✓ •9 �- �� +G ¢;1•� _ ; 47.00 i'- - 9.00 . ��� 25 29 �.n8.40 - +, ` t'1tsba 1 1 I4 1.9t+l9.Ti r-- C•It9.54 r p•,;*,$% +, {o b+1,54'08" Q W Q o t a 0 3 u vct t ` ml fo 2 o m ' { V o V 133.51 �to 25 25 $`r cp�84'3v' OG•f i `,{ O '� s Iii p QO.aO. f d to � �, w 'V1 e� ',; .� •�1eo a 60 • 1 cv p It +• a �' ` '''-9? �i ■ �':}��'' µ93•!g 00'�oe�• 4 O • 1�s�T•�5i3i�2, QO'(r ~� liJ _ f ��$q;�7 �'N4425'� C 4batt ' e� 1,t tt 4': •. t+c•44.6: �� 6 1 1 t� f e• sa•oo oo•'�, t'o_, '�� ,,..- a s ,w / �' r .. , / l / � � � 60,E ,,. '" �, ,,. •.3�' O :t 0 60 120 kpo.. FE�.T t LJ •'� StAi.E tl�ilrf and Drainage eoserrenl sh°w"7 flus: + y t The nor/h la4uf/af G. lane of o 7 L17 (i) subdivision roque t for final approv#1 of subdivision plat as Meadow pakllyd Ultra gome9s Inc. I Planning Commission Agenda - 7/10/84 4. Public Hearing - Ordinance Amendment to Allow as a Conditional Use a Boarding House in a B-4 Zone, Applicant - City of Monticello. (G.A. ) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND City staff has drafted an Ordinance Amendment to allow boarding houses as a Conditional Use in a B-4 Zone. City Attorney Gary Pringle will be reviewing the Ordinance Amendment No. 138, and his comments will be enclosed on a separate sheet. As you will note in Ordinance Amendment No. 138, there are six conditions that are attached to the Conditional Use to allow a boarding house in a B-4 Zone. First, the building or structure has to be substandard or blighted, or in substantial need of rehabilitation. In doing so, the applicant must provide an overall development plan. The applicant must demonstrate that the rehabilitation is the most feasible alternative and that such rehabilitation is not remodeling or simple structure changes to accommodate this change in use. Thore would be a minimum of ten unite and not more than IB units in such structure and that each unit be considered to be an efficiency apartment. At least one unit must be on the ground floor and be fully accossible to handicapped persons. At least 50% of the ground floor should be developed into a complete restaurant with minimum seating capacity of two seats per dwelling unit but in no case shall it be less than 25 soato. The restaurant itself shall not be eligible for licensee of intoxicating liquor, non -intoxicating malt liquors, wine, or display or consumption of liquors- The restaurant ahall be equipped to provide food service to the dwelling units if required. Architoetural appearance of the building on the cite shall not bo diaalailar with existing buildings. All the conditions pertaining to the specific site aro aubjoct to change when determined by City Council that upon investigation it flndo that the general walfatro and public betterment can be served Gs well or better by modifying the condltiona. I think we have addrosood Go many condltiona to Cho Conditional Uae in this Goction of the Ordinance to curb any now devolopmento of boarding houcoo in a B-4 Zone. However, you may have other conditions you would like to Goo applied to the boarding house Conditional Uoo or some exiating conditions an liotod be dulated or re-wordad. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the Ordinance Amendment to allow boarding hounco Go a Conditional lloe in a 8-4 Zone. 2. Deny the Ordinanco Amendment to allow boarding houaco as G Conditional UGo in a B-4 Zone. - 2 - Planning Commission Agenda - 7/10/84 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approval of the Ordinance Amendment No. 138 to allow boarding houses as a Conditional Use in a B-4 Zone with City Attorney, Gary Pringles, comments attached on a separate sheet. We feel that we have addressed this type of housing, in particular business zone, and that we will in time in the Comprehensive Plan address other types of housing such as apartments at the time of review of the Comprehensive Plan. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of Ordinance Amendment No. 138; Copy of the comments from City Attorney, Gary Pringle. City Attorney, Gary Pringle, reviewed Ordinance Amendment and approved. - 3 - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 136 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DO HEREBY ORDAIN: Title 10, Chapter 14, Subdivision 4 be amended by adding Paragraph (G), to wit: (G) Boarding House, providad that: 1) The building/structure is found to be substandard and/or blighted or constributing to blight, and in need of substantial rehabilitation. a) The applicant must provide an overall development concept plan. b) The applicant must demonstrate that said rehabilitation is the most feasible use alternative, and that said rehabilitation Is not remodeling or simple structural alterations to accommodato a change in use. 2) There shall be no less than ten (101 units nor more than 10 units, and that each unit shall be of a design considered to be an efficiency apartment. 3) At lonot one unit shall be on ground floor fully accessible to handicapped persons. 4) At least 50% of the floor area on the ground floor shall be dovolopod so complete restaurant facilities with a minimum seating capacity of two seats per (walling unit but in no case loos than 25 sesta. a) Rootourant shall not be eligible for licancoa regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors, non -intoxicating malt liquors, wino, or the display and consumption of liquors. b) Thorestaurant shall be so equipped to provide food service to the dwelling units it required. 5) Tho architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be as dissimilar to the existing building❑ or arca as to couoo Impairment in property values or constituto a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. I •I 6) All conditions pertaining to a opacific site aro oubjoct Jto chango when the Council, upon Investigation in rolstion to a foroal requoot, frets that tho goneral welfare and public botturcont can be served so well or batter by codifying the wnditlono. 00 Planning Commission Agenda - 7/10/84 5. Public Hearing - Conditional Use Request to Allow a Boarding House in a B-4 Zone, Applicant - Thomas Hammer. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. Hammer is before you with a Conditional Use Request to allow a boarding house in a B-4 Zone. Mr. Hammer currently has 10 efficiency apartments in the upstairs portion of his building and is proposing five additional units in the lower level with one unit being equipped for the handicapped, thus allowing approximately 501 of the front portion of the lower level of his building for the restaurant. Mr. Hammer feels the type of use as a boarding house in a B-4 Zone is a good mixture or good blend with the surrounding businesses in the B-4 Zone. The building itself, being in rather dilapidated condition when Nr. Hammer purchased it, has had a considerable amount of money spent on it by Mr. Hammer to renovate this old army barrack structure, its lost use being as a bowling alley. Mr. Hammer's original content is that the building which was originally designed or used as an old army barracks did have some type of reeidential nature to it. Basically what he would like to do is to have ten apartments upstairs and also be allowed to have five additional unite in the lower level, with approximately half of his building being allowed for a restaurant. The substantial renovation that Nr. Hammer has done is completely strip the interior walls down to the studs, installed new insulation, new fire code aheetrock, divided off each of the units with fire walls, installed complete separate kitchen and bathroom facilities for each of the ton units up above and for the planned five units in tho lower level. In doing so, he has brought the entire building up to the current Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Plumbing Code. Other than seeing very little structural or cosmetic change in the outoido, Nr. Hammer will be retuck-pointing the stucco in different places on the exterior of the building. Also, major landscaping will be done on the east and west oides of the building. A general overall clean-up of the entire structure will be done from what it was when he bought it. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the Conditional Use Request to allow a boarding house in a B-4 Zone. 7. Deny the Conditional Use Request to allow a boarding house in a 8-4 Zone. C. OTAFF RECOMMMATION: City staff has spent considerable amount of time in reviewing Planning Commission Agenda - 7/10/84 the drafting of the Ordinance Amendment to allow boarding houses. In reviewing of Mr. Hammer's project, Mr. Hemmer has spent a considerable amount of money to renovate a very substandard building, bringing the building up to the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Plumbing Code and basically addressing a blighted area, with the basic nature of the boarding house being very similar to the original intended use of the building, an old army barracks. Therefore, we recommend approval of Mr. Hammer's Conditional Use Request to allow a boarding house in a B-4 Zone with the condition that the restaurant be in full operation before the lover level units are rented out. The restaurant must remain in full operation as a condition to this Conditional Use Request and not just opened to got his Conditio..al Use Request and then at a later time being closed down. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the proposed location of the proposed boarding house in a B-4 Zone. - 5 - `tp', •� `�'+/l. /1r'�" ,'•,a ,i�tL'.'�t.f":t�4{��r'+�pj•� �„ '1. .�?';/ +�,: -'r- r (r �j. �-0 311 i c tiry- ,/p . ;' -/ Ts iL�• i � '(`+� �'•j I R ` yT7 •' 1t•J (� 11 "S •'Y 1)!' _ `'•�^w' N., .'`• •=.�f � y�iJ n+.+r; T',. �/ r 7:"i..,._ I'i r s: i}, i 1 t,,, , t::. �.1•` t 1+•. tlJi,~' •,. �.. � w� t t �t �+- .,..,, t-i..i f f'r lt"'•1� it ,i � J r l�t+i'..t• rii tw-•„-�.,�cJ"' =,� + J i.. :) r":7-.""•.� 4..,;... , �' es/,.�y r n f ".t', lc, ��w � y+'t l�'�. +•§J.r�"may �h'.r'p f�•"�,'t'� j'� rr. ' �'L-.:•:1°� �. �� a�.'..' qtr=. �! ;�� ( �!� ,.���1• ar. . J ,+1J".•;l 1f�, j"';• L,r � ;� � �s� �.t � -..- ��.. �•�: �', i ,{•j.;,: -ti. f �f'+�i �L+��`r�,�_; �t •{a+: • ,' ,�+'.,..'t'. �-:�1 , • 7�,t � �:. {• nr ��1 �,,., t �.o#�tlr i `j ,» t t'a'.. . 1� NIGMWAY..- oral U q xpnn' Np. 94 t0♦ c—e���.� ^u�gnAt°°o ``�µ E'q;•jr 111`1 wD'•i, l` `\ u'e, \` „s�`•a" �^ 4- rr Planning Commission Agenda - 7/10/84 6. Simple Subdivision Request to Subdivide a Residential Lot for Driveway Purposes, Applicant - Monticello -Big Lake Community Hospital. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Monticello -Big Lake Community Hospital has purchased the former E.M. Wulf property with plane to demolish the existing house, level the site, and ready the site for a proposed new ambulance garage to be built there. In doing so, the former owners of the property would like to have deeded off to them a 10 -foot strip along the westerly side of Lot 2 for driveway access purposes to the rear portion of their lot. In doing so, it would require a simple subdivision. In doing the simple subdivision with the westerly 10 feet subdivided off for driveway purposes, the lot would meet the current minimum lot size required in an R-1 Zone, 12,000 sq. ft., but would be approximately 84/100 of a foot front feet short of the minimum required in an R-1 Zone, which is 80 feet. They are proposing 79.16 front feet. With a new ambulance garage proposed to be built, it would meet the setbacks in an R-1 Zone, 10 feet front and rear setback, 10 feet sideyard setback. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the simple subdivision request to allow the westerly 10 -foot portion of the property be subdivided off for driveway access purposes to the rear of the property. 2. Deny the simple subdivision requeot to subdivide the westerly 10 -foot portion for driveway access to the rear of the property. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the simple oubdivisfon request allowing tho westerly 10 feet be oubdivided off for driveway access purposes to the rear of the property. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the proposed subdivided lot existing; Copy of the proposed subdivided lot onto subdivided; Copy of the terms of the purchase of the property. - 6 - i i t � i apt-n►Esw Lia&f Dt.-r i c":LJ�iL 00 i F...._... ....... .^ } MiVflidMH6Llr G'o�.r16 OF L.t 2 7� Mo CA s i + Al l "tMi�i1.b i i t � i �' ho�.r�lLtd t�r0 hru r�GLO � ai L4 4 -r aaa pr fyyL.i y�l���.at6 iilor•itf.64�.0 Pj¢OA��o►-+ ti-�s.t�K 2)1 ,$yoC �,o� 2* .tet ty3 tiPw 1p eeceet . 2u Jt'c'vtoJo 010 e° a j;l, %n oo'C� eyr $ OA Oras% . P1 0 tC <titietee� Ge t6Q e9 r`�c OG<S: ttoti9 r '0"t tit ~�-~°�- -~~�--�- ----�_ --' ' '~_ \ '- - \ ~ ,�` ' ih _,'- \ J\ _ '~ .. ^� \ The following terms and conditions are hereby agreed to by the Mright County State Dank as seller, and the Monticello -Big Lake Coriunity Hospital District as purchaser of the following described real estate: That part of Lots I and 2, Block 24, Lower Monticello, according to the plat thereof of record and on file in the office of the County Recorder, Vrioht County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly corner of said Lot 1, thence southeasterly along the southerly line of said Lot I. a distance of 42.84 feet to the actual point of beginning, thence continuing along said southerly line of Lot I and the southerly line of said Lot 2, a dis- tance of 89.16 feet to the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2; thence northeasterly along the easterly line of said Lot 2, a distance of L66.61 feet to the north- easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence northwesterly along the northerly line of said Lots 1 and 2, a dis- tance of 86.19 feet; thence southwesterly, a distance of 167.64 fact to the point of boginnin G. 1. The seller will pay all real estate taxer due and payable in the year 1984. Z. The purchaser will aysure any special assessments against the above-deacrthed property due and payable in 1985 or thereafter. 3. The purchaser agreca to allow former ownur, LP. H. llulf to remove any property from the dwelling, whether attached or not, at any time until full payment is tendered. 4. The purchaser agrees to remove existing building from property as soon an possible. 5. The purchaser agrees to approach the Citi of Monticello to request a simple subdivision of the abovu-described property in order to deed back to former owner, R. 14. and Helen W. Wulf, the westerly ten feet of the property more precisely described as: That part of Lot 1, Block 24, Lower Monticello, according to the plat thereof of record and on fila in the office of the County Recorder, Wright County, :ilnneaota, dos- cribed an follows: Ceameneing of the c outhwestarly corner of said Lot 1; thence oouthenoterly along the southerly line of said Lot 1, a diatanco of 42.04 fact to tho actual point of beginning thence northeastarly to a point on the norther- ly line of said Lot 1, distant 06.19 feet northwesterly from the northeasterly corner of Lot 2, of o old Block 24; thenen nouthcaotarly along the northerly line of ooid Lot 1, a distance of 10.09 fact; thence couthwea terly to a point on the southerly ling of sold Lot 1, a distant IO.f)O feat couth- easterly of the point of beginning; thence northwesterly along the southerly line of Lot I. a distance of 10.00 feet to the point of luelnnim;. G 6. The purchaser agrees that if the City of :!onticello rejects the simple subdivldion of property deeded by the seller, they will execute a permanent casement for ingress and egress over Cu westerly 10 feet described above to the said C. :1. Vulf and Helen W. Wulf. 7. The seller agrees to provide a registered survey of t!ie Westerly 10 feet in question and stake the corners. Monticello -Big Lake Community Hospital District W ht Countv Statte/Bank �•l 41e!i /N-«tO�� n_ -urs_....,.., _,:J_e.•�`i,.t1+� Planning Commission Agenda - 7/10/84 7. Public Hearing - Conditional Use Request to Allow an Ambulance Garage to be Built in an R-1 Zone, Applicant - Monticello -Big Lake Community Hospital. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Monticello -Big Lake Community Hospital is proposing to build an ambulance garage on a newly purchased residential lot next to the Monticello Dental Clinic, just west of the existing Monticello Dental Clinic building. The current lot does meet the requirements for minimum lot size, 12,000 sq. ft., but would be 84/100 of a foot short of the minimum 80 -foot front footage needed for an R-1 lot. What they would have is 79.16 front feet. The ambulance garage to be built would conform with the setbacks required in an R-1 Zone, those being 30 -foot front yard, 30 -foot rear yard, and a 10 -foot sideyard setback. The architectural design of the new ambulance garage would blend in with the existing design of the buildings. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the Conditional Use Request to allow an ambulance garage to be built in an R-1 Zone. 2. Deny the Conditional Use Request to allow an ambulance garage D Ito be built in an R-1 Zona. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Request to allow an ambulance yarage to be built in an R-1 Zona, with the now ambulance garage mooting the required setbacks and being of architectural design to blond in with the oxi.ating buildings. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the proposed location of the proposed ambulance garage; Copy of the ambulance garage vita plan. - 7 - No. 94 0-1UOO t tonal. or6icto al Cc co "otilo, rovgan an so 1+ �� ~ + 1Y ` to O'collo-DW JJG� �� ll` ) � fit, i i �•- __� �` 0 . ., ...• �. .... � �.s � � a.w.% w:.� � t ' l/ �/, r-- ;;t� � � a �� - I _;,� ; I r—" ----—t t --_____t _ �'.� � � � ' _._ __._ .y � �' 1 �d I � �` i' I 1 i '_ .. Y.. � .T l' . � t � I � I � .... �a�... � ' .d.1.,... � j r.,.�,.,. � 1 .�... �.... � �' �v _ .t n — Planning Commission Agenda - 7/10/86 .� 8. Simple Subdivision Request to Subdivide Residential Multi -family Acreage, Applicant - Ed Doran. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. Ed Doran, current owner of the former Rand Mansion property, is before you with a simple subdivision request to subdivide that portion of land attributed to the former Rand Mansion property. In Mr. Doran -s request, he would subdivide the parcel consisting of 3.12 acres into two parcels. The first would be approximately a 1 -acre parcel to go with the existing former Rand Mansion property. The excess 2.12 acres would go for residential multi- family vacant lot property. Mr. Doran indicates he would like to sell the vacant lot property as Ono parcel, and the buyer of the property would come in with his or her proposal for development of the property and any subdividing of the property from there. The intent of his simple subdivision request is to allow him to sell off the adjacent vacant land, 2.12 acres, separate from the former Rand Mansion property. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the simple subdivision request to subdivide an existing 3.12 acre parcel into two parcels, one a 1 -acre parcel, and the other parcel 2.12 acres. 2. Deny the simple subdivision request to subdivide the existing parcel into two parcels, ono being a 1 -acre parcel and the other being a 2.12 acre parcel. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff racommondo approval of the oimpla oubdlvioion request to subdivide the current 3.12 acre parcel into two parcels, with the 1 -acro parcel going to the former Rand Manolon property, and the other 2.12 acreo going to the reoidential multi -family vacant lot parcel. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the prop000d location of the oimpla oubdivicion roqueot; Copy of the cite plan of the oimplo oubdiviolon roquoot. -a- 5t"'. M'-- rJw Moc;p ;,.ter 4 " vti IL.IL40. A:z, Planning Commission Agenda - 7/10/84 9. Preliminary Request to Rezone a Proposed Preliminary Plat Approved Subdivision, Applicant - John Sandberg. (G.A. ) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. Sandberg Is preliminary request for his new subdivision, Par West Subdivision, was approved some months ago by Planning Commission and City Council. At that time it did allow two types of zoning out there, R-1 Zoning and R-2 Zoning. Mr. Sandberg will be before you requesting that the entire area be rezoned to R-2 instead of just a portion of 1t for R-2. Mr. Sandberg feels that this will allow him more flexibility within the zoning of his proposed subdivision. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve for. Sandberg's preliminary request for rezoning the entire parcel to R-2 and set a public hearing date for August 14, 1984. 2. Deny Mr. Sandberg's preliminary rezoning request to rezone the entire subdivision to R-2 and not achadule a public hearing for August 14, 1984. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends going along with Mr. Sandberg's preliminary request and scheduling the public hearing date for August 14, 1984, to have Mr. Sandberg's entire aubdivioion rezoned to R-2. It was the general consensus of the City otaff along with Consulting Planner, Howard Dahlgren 6 A000cioteo, John Uban, Consultant, that the entire area could be rezoned to an R-2 to still accommodate Mr. Sandberg 'a needs, so more than two units aro only allowed in R-2 Zoning ao a Conditional Use. Therefore, the public hearingo would be necessary. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the prop000d zoning ao it currently otando in tho oubdlviaion; Copy of the prop000d rezoning of the entire plat to R-2. - 9 - IN, i •ets4. 't �'-. '' ,rjl r •ea ,�'T.�•�-.s?.41'm to N •t•It•t• 14 • , p �� =nw .n.... Vt ~ ------ -IIR�A75. t -IT, 9 Ili rp rNl � � fit /j , f//'+ x �•» � . / 8 a r af ell i s � / •it '�'�\ • +� '� a +..., � "y + tt = �s tr� 'fir %`; a y, a ♦ Y,.t i 4A "n all a s ���• /j `� r ' + � o%' .Jv �_/,1tt�rl�r a• es.._ '•' t ; i • : , � . `�+� �>, Ism —� � #_ • F ._.– .-.._..: _...–..– – _...ao –...._ .. iso .. � + Y �%�. I–t�•tc•.•t sae-.•-- r � ��aii [ t....,..wr...»....•..r., �.' [~i"•.-..... i«. `'__ `I�M.�.sYN.it s,r..+•.I O N L I A rol RESOLUTION 1964 # RESOLUTION APPROVING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN #5 WHEREAS, the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority has adopted a resolution approving Tax Increment Financing Plan #5 pursuant to M.S. Sections 273.71, et seq., and WHEREAS, said Tex Increment Finance Plan has been submitted to the Planning Commission as required by M.S. 462, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, THAT: 1) Tax Increment Financing Plan #5 is found to carry out the purpose and policy of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, and is hereby in all respects approved. 2) Copies of this resolution be forwarded to the City Counell of the City of Monticello. Adopted this 10th day of July, 1964. ATTEST: Chair 'QC1-a4-(0