Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
City Council Agenda Packet 06-26-2017AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 26, 2017 — 5 p.m.
Academy Room
AGENDA
1. 5 p.m. — 2016 Audit Review
2. 5:45 p.m. — Review Street Projects CIP and Financing
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
2. Review Street Proiects CIP and Financing
Below is an outline of the topics to discuss at the workshop.
Enclosed is a map of the proposed street improvements and estimated costs.
1. Project Descriptions- street, sidewalk and trail considerations
2. Construction timing
3. Financing considerations
• Recommended maximum bonding of $5,000,000 per year
• Property Tax Revenue
• Reserves
4. Other Items to consider
• Fallon Ave sewer extension study and service area determination.
• Complete traffic volume analysis after Fallon Overpass constructed and development
(Mills Fleet Farm, etc).
• Signal warrant analysis at School Blvd/Cedar Street and Chelsea Road/Cedar Street.
• Flashing yellow arrow retrofits on TH 25 signals- priority and timing
• 95th St Extension- finalize feasibility study and decision
• Future workshop on trail and sidewalk gap connections and prioritization
2018-2022 CIP
6/26/17
Proposed
Estimated
Construction
Project
PROJECT Year
Cost
Fallon Ave Overpass 2018
$8,400,000
7th Street- Cedar to Washington
7th Street mill and overlay $300,000
7th Street trail 2 "overlay $95,000
7th Street sidewalk- south side $135,000
Total 7th Street- Cedar to Washingtron 2018 $530,000
Cedar St, south of 7th St- keep rural 2018 $120,000
Chelsea Road 2019
Chelsea Road Reconstruction- Edmonson to Fallon $1,000,000
Chelsea Road mill and overlay - 25-Edmonson $175,000
Chelsea Road Trail -north side $125,000
Chelsea Road Sidewalk- south side $140,000
Chelsea Road FM extension- TBD $435,000
Total Chelsea Road $1,875,000
Fallon Avenue 2020-20XX
Fallon Ave Reconstruction - Chelsea to School $1,500,000
Fallon Ave Trail - Chelsea to School $140,000
Fallon Ave trunk sewer extension- Chelsea to School TBD $2,500,000
Total Fallon $4,140,000
Balbou Street Recon (Area 6 )
2020
$1,500,000
Briar Oaks, Oakridge Street Recon (Area 7B)
2021
$1,500,000
Cardinal Hills - mill and overlay or reclaim and pave
2022
$2,500,000
FINANCING PLAN
BONDING YEAR
BONDING AMOUNT
MAX $5M
Fallon Avenue Overpass
2017
$3,000,000
2017 Street and Utility Improvements
2017
$2,000,000
Total 2017
$5,000,000
Fallon Avenue Overpass
2018
$5,000,000
7th Street and Cedar Street
2018
Total 2018
$5,000,000
Fire Station
2019
$3,000,000
Chelsea Road Reconstruction
2019
$2,000,000
Total 2019
$5,000,000
Fallon Ave Reconstruction
2020-20XX
$2,000,000
Fallon Aven Trunk Sewer Extension- TBD
2020-20XX
$2,500,000
Tota 1
$4,500,000
Balboul Recon (Area 6)
2020
$1,500,000
Briarwood, Oakridge Recon (Area 7B)
2021
$1,500,000
Cardinal Hills mill and overlay or reclaim and pave
2022
$2,500,000
Property Tax Revenue
and/or Reserves
$650,000
Monticello Geographic Information System
P
O
sTN 5"1 N�
I ---� �—1 I
REST
CT \ ? PRI411 R❑ y11LL
n
P
\�. O �V LIEFERT OR
CRF �i jF
N
STNE m \
COUNTY ROAD 39 NE \\\
GWE VIEW DR
-` GOLF COUP
Y1 \�
"FAIR
I cr =
O
I
z
I
-0 1,250 2,500 Feet
POTENTIAL
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
2018-2022
OSTW
VP
3 �� OLL-9f- pRl�q !DR
TI . -S PARk
z R
a WFSz
h
0
T S I
CT,y Du nR iao�
F -I
DEEGAN u�/
�EnPce° Ha wARo° :;TG� 2020 2 24?
FA.RMST>-."M x(+•10 -
z ?
0� �i u
�4
44.
II P °
/ w
__—_ �. EaaLEBROOK DK p � •. "" A P0.I rnN
P G]
HARV
m.cr
_ —_-- �% < NF_ O
RIVER 7/f� vv
Oq NE
-.
CTNE..
b��P port-t�Rff
LNG AVE NE TO E8' 194 \ � F9
\\
_ STH ST NE
94TH I.l Ar —
SAD
a
O BRIAR OAK,,o
Sn
%49
E
S
ISI 0IE`I'1 LN p \ \ yoRW
EAST OAK DR\\ F
_ \
w _ Q
sIS'GN CIR EE's" K. Z
m'lll� w U
8�e ST DEER y �G O Z
NE O/R (n O
w x
BA nr,E R15L 2&4DGERC-R_ ¢
w I x
4 84THS"!
L.
St NE.
� I
0� I
_-�2NLLSS11E
1 inch = 2,092.828706 feet so ary of Monticell o G1
CITY OF
1MVIoLntikelfflo
1
9 m o
m COUNTYRnAD39NE
= 2018
= 2019
2020
= 2021
2022
\ P5TH ST NE
z
�E J—
a N
w�E
Ewument Path J4gis4clty4MONllMaps4Basemapmxd s
June 26, 2017—
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 26, 2017 — 6:30 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETINGIWORKSHOP
Academy Room
5 p.m. 2016 Audit Review
5:45 p.m. Review Street Projects CIP and Financing
Mayor: Brian Stumpf
Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart
1. General Business
A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance
B. Approval of Meeting Minutes
• Special Meeting Minutes from June 12, 2017
• Regular Meeting Minutes from June 12, 2017
C. Consideration of Adding Items to Agenda
D. Citizen Comments
E. Public Service Announcements/Updates
• Construction Update
F. Council Liaison Updates
• Library Board
• EDA
• MOAA
G. Department Updates
• City Administrator Update
• Congressional Update — Stacy Morse, 61 District Director
2. Consent Agenda
A. Consideration of approving payment of bills
B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments
C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property
D. Consideration of shifting to paperless agendas beginning the first City Council
meeting in July 2017
E. Consideration of approving an application for a temporary on -sale liquor license
for the Monticello Lions Club for their Brewfest event on August 19, 2017
F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing exclusive use of
West Bridge Park and related assistance in conjunction with the Brewfest event
on August 19, 2017. Applicant: Monticello Lions Club
G. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at
Chatter's Bar & Grill on July 14 and 15, 2017. Applicant: Steffens,
Brooke/Chatters Restaurant
H. Consideration of approving annual liquor license renewals for 2017-2018
I. Consideration of approving the Finance Manager to attend 2017 Accela Finance
and Administration National Training in Portland, OR on 7/19/17 through 7/20/17
at an estimated cost of $1,750
J. Consideration of approving the Community Center Director to attend the 2017
National Recreation and Parks Association Conference in New Orleans, LA on
9/25/17 through 9/28/17 at an estimated cost of $1,537
K. Consideration of approving a request for Development Stage Planned Unit
Development and Preliminary Plat for Spaeth Industrial Park for a multi -lot
industrial development in an I-2 (Heavy Industrial) District. Applicant: Spaeth,
Ken
L. Consideration of approving Summary Ordinance No. 671A for amendment to the
Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter
4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3
for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for
regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks
M. Consideration of calling for a public hearing on `date' by the Monticello Planning
Commission on the amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan for
adoption of the Downtown Small Area Plan
N. Consideration of approving installation of new electrical service at Well House #2
by Olson & Sons Electric (OSE) for $12,259 and Xcel Energy for $12,912.85
(total of $25,171.85)
O. Consideration of approving an outside cleaning service to clean city buildings at a
cost of $53,100 annually
P. Consideration of approving the replacement of Community Center aquatic play
structure by Recreation by Lemmie Jones at a cost of $99,765
Q. Consideration of approving the plaster resurfacing of the pool vessel at the
Community Center by Northern Pool Restoration at a cost of $79,653.29
R. Consideration of approving payment of sick time balances, estimated at $81,760,
into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan for Union employees transitioning to
the City's PTO plan
2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion
3. Public Hearings
A. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-29 approving
property tax abatement related to infrastructure improvement in the City of
Monticello
4. Regular Agenda
A. Consideration of accepting the 2016 Audit Report
B. Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for `Places to
Shop' to `Places to Work' and a request for Rezoning from a B-4 (Regional
Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers and
John Chadwick
C. Consideration of approving a request for Amendment to Planned Unit
Development, Development Stage Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary
Plat for Chelsea Corner for Office, Service, and Warehouse Uses in the Red
Rooster Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Red Rooster Properties, Inc.
D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-27 accepting grant and committing to
local matching funds, estimated at $110,000, for the 2017 MnDOT Stand -Alone
Noise Barrier Program
5. Added Items
6. Adjournment
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 12, 2017 — 5 p.m.
Academy Room
City Hall - Monticello Community Center
Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart
Absent: None
Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Wayne Oberg, Angela Schumann, Shibani Bisson, Rachel
Leonard, Tom Moores, Sarah Rathlisberger, Mat Stang, Tracy Ergen, Jim Thares,
and Matt Theisen Others: Chuck Keyes, Veolia Water North America Project
Manager, and Margaret Becker, Veolia Water North America VP of Operations
1. Call to Order
Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 5 p.m.
2. WWTP Operation Management Alternative — Management Contract vs. City Staff
Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, introduced the item and gave a presentation. The
presentation included: history of WWTP operations and operations comparison of private
contract versus city staff. Mr. O'Neill stated that the decision of private contract versus
city staff does not have to be made at the present time, however, a letter needs to be sent
stating non -renewal 120 prior to expiration or the contract automatically renews. Some
of the considerations discussed during the workshop were: facilities maintenance;
staffing; technical support; and capital improvements.
Chuck Keyes, Veolia Manager, addressed the City Council and provided information on
the operations of the facility and what Veolia provides in service. He added that
Monticello has a complicated system. Mat Stang, Public Works, responded that the
system is complex, however, city staff would be able to operate at current level.
Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, gave a brief history of expenditures. Mr. Oberg
commented that implementing a change in operations to city staff would save
approximately $121,000 annually.
The notice of non -renewal is on the regular meeting agenda.
3. Adjournment
By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 5:55 p.m.
Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber
Approved: Attest:
City Administrator
City Council Special Meeting Minutes—June 12, 2017
REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 12, 2017 — 6:30 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart
Absent: None.
1. General Business
A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. All City Councilmembers
were present.
B. Approval of Meeting Minutes
Special Meeting Minutes from Mav 22, 2017
Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the special meeting minutes of
May 22, 2017. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
Regular Meeting Minutes from Mav 22, 2017
Councilmember Fair moved approval of the regular meeting minutes from
May 22, 2017. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion
carried unanimously.
C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda
• None.
D. Citizen Comments
• Chuck Keyes, WWTP Manager - Veolia, noted that Veolia has achieved the
Outstanding Compliance, Maintenance and Management Award from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for each year managing and operating
Monticello's Wastewater Treatment Facility.
E. Public Service Announcements
Mayor Stumpf thanked various entities for their help with the storm
aftermath — Wright County Sheriff's Department, Fire Department, City
Staff — Public Works and Administration/Communications. Rachel
Leonard, Communications Coordinator, provided additional information
on storm cleanup.
City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 1 1 9
• Rachel Leonard, Communications Coordinator, provided an update on the
following:
- Summer Kick Off at Bertram Chain of Lakes will be June 17,
2017.
- Movie in the Park will be June 24, 2017 at Pioneer Park.
• Shibani Bisson, WSB/City Engineer, provided a construction update on
the following:
- TH 25/7th Street Intersection - most of the concrete work is
completed and the permanent signal will be up within a couple
weeks. The total project will be completed by the end of June,
weather permitting.
2016 Street Reconstruction project — the streets between TH 25
and Washington Street and between Broadway and 7th Street will
receive final pavement beginning June 19. It will take four days to
complete.
2017 Street Reconstruction project — reconstruction in the area of
Gillard Avenue and Mississippi Drive will begin June 26 and
notification has been sent to residents, including those in Sunset
Ponds. Gillard Avenue will be open to traffic. Haug, 90th St., and
95th St. project area will begin the middle of July. Hart Blvd. and
Sandberg Rd. area is scheduled for August. The total project is
expected to be completed by September.
F. Council Liaison Updates
• Parks and Recreation Commission — Councilmember Fair provided an
update on the commission meeting. Some of the items reviewed were a
new commission member, vandalism, scholarship program, the Ellison
house committee, and a presentation on the Downtown Area Study.
• IEDC — Mayor Stumpf gave a brief overview of the meeting and
mentioned that Dahlheimer is hosting a tour of their expansion on June 6,
2017.
• Planning Commission — Councilmember Gabler provided an update
which included the agenda items of CentraCare PUD amendment, Mills
Fleet Farm sign amendment, Red Rooster PUD amendment, outdoor
storage, and the Small Area Study.
• I-94 Coalition — Charlotte Gabler noted that the Coalition received an
update on the Corridors of Commerce funding.
G. Department Updates
• Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, provided an update on the following:
1. The committee on the Ellison house has been established and there is still
the need for an additional EDA member. Quotes were received and there
is authorization to begin a hazardous waste survey of the house.
2. Cost estimates were obtained in regard to a safe sell sit and they were
significant. This item will be addressed in the 2018 budget.
City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 2 1 9
3. Wright County has a board meeting on June 13, 2017, at which time they
will be voting on a local option sales tax.
4. Monticello has been invited by Sherburne County to attend a meeting on
WWTP long range planning.
Shibani Bisson gave an update on the Noise Barrier open house.
Approximately 15 people attended and staff received positive feedback. Ms.
Bisson also noted that a Special City Council workshop will be held on June
26 to review future street projects and funding.
2. Consent Agenda
Councilmember Fair moved approval of the Consent Agenda excluding items D and
J. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved
the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,052,582.96.
B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved
the hires for the MCC, Liquor Store, and Water and the terminations for
MCC and Parks.
C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property.
Recommendation: Approved the surplus list as presented.
D. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-22 accepting donations for the
Farmer's Market, Walk `n Roll, and Summer Movie in the Park series for a total
donation amount of $1,443. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.
E. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park,
West Bridge Park, Pioneer Park, core City public right of way, Community
Center parking lot and related city assistance in conjunction with the annual
Riverfest community celebration on July 13-16, 2017. Recommendation:
Approved the Special Event Permit allowing the use of Ellison Park, West
Bridge Park, Pioneer Park, Community Center Parking Lot, City rights of
way and related City staff assistance in conjunction with the annual Riverfest
celebration on July 13-16, 2017, contingent on the continued site plan and
traffic control coordination with Public Works and the Wright County
Sheriffs Office and lot closure signage and notification in coordination with
the Street Superintendent as needed.
F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of city streets
and related assistance for the Downtown Block Party on July 12, 2017.
Recommendation: Approved the Special Event Permit allowing temporary
closing of Walnut Street from 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. on Wednesday, July 12,
2017, including the use of public parking facilities, staff resources and
City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 3 1 9
amenities as described in the application, contingent on continues site
coordination with Street Superintendent and restoration of the 3rd Street
parking lot to satisfaction of Public Works Department.
G. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park
and related assistance in conjunction with Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello on
Saturday, July 15, 2017. Recommendation: Approved the Special Event
Permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in conjunction
with the Art in the Park/Taste of the Town celebration on July 15, 2017.
H. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 668 amending Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 5
— Municipal Liquor Store. Recommendation: Approved Ordinance 668
amending Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 5 — Municipal Liquor Ordinance.
I. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-23 calling for a public hearing and
granting preliminary approving for the Issuance of Conduit Revenue Bonds for
the benefit of SRCS Building Company. Recommendation: Approved
Resolution 2017-23 calling for a public hearing granting preliminary
approval for the issuance of conduit revenue bonds for the benefit of the
SRCS Building Company.
J. Consideration to renew 2017 membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance
for $1,500. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT AGENDA.
K. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-24 approving a Master Partnership
Contract with MnDOT. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2017-24
approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT.
L. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-25 accepting a petition and calling
for a public hearing on July 10, 2017 on vacation of drainage and utility
easements for Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center Fifth
Addition. Applicant: Laurentian Properties, LLC. Recommendation: Approved
Resolution 2017-25 accepting the petition and calling for a public hearing on
Monday, July 10, 2017 to consider the vacation of a portion of drainage and
utility easements over and across Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 Monticello
Commerce Center Fifth Addition.
M. Consideration of appointing a representative to the Parks and Recreation
Commission. Recommendation: Approved the appointment of Karen Vetsch
to the Monticello Parks and Recreation Commission with her term ending
December 31, 2019.
N. Consideration of approving a request for amendment to Mills Fleet Farm Planned
Unit Development for proposed changes to signage. Applicant: Ramerth, Tim —
Wideseth Smith Nolting. Recommendation: Approved Ordinance 670
City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 4 1 9
approving the amendment to the Mills Fleet Farm PUD Ordinance for sign
allowances, per the submitted plans, based on the findings in Resolution No.
PC -2017-010, and incorporating the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff
report.
O. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-26 authorizing preparation of a
Feasibility Report for 7th Street, Chelsea Road and Washington Street
Improvements as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project.
Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2017-26 authorizing preparation of
a Feasibility Report for improvements to 7th Street, Chelsea Road and
Washington Street Improvements as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass
Project.
P. Consideration of authorizing final design services for Fallon Avenue Overpass
Project, City Project No. 16C006. Recommendation: Approved authorizing
WSB to provide final design services at an estimated cost of $420,000 for the
Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project 16C006.
Q. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-28 committing local matching funds
for FAST ACT federal funding for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City
Project No. 16C006. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2017-28
committing local matching funds for FAST ACT federal funding for the
Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006.
R. Consideration of a request for amendment to Conditional Use Permit for
Development and Final Stage Planned Unit Development for entrance and
building additions in a B-2 (Limited Business) District. Applicant: Lemke, Lenore
— CentraCare Health Monticello. Recommendation: Approved the amendment
to Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Planned Unit Development
for CentraCare Health Monticello, contingent on compliance with the
findings in Resolution #PC -2017-009 and those conditions specified in
Exhibit Z.
S. Consideration of approving Ordinance No. 671 for amendments to the Monticello
Zoning Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter 4, Section 5
for regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for
regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations
for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks. Applicant: City of Monticello.
Recommendation: Approved Ordinance 671 for amendments to the
Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls;
Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -tenant building signage,
Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and
Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks,
based on findings in Resolution PC -2017-015.
City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 5 1 9
2A. Consideration of items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion.
D. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-22 accepting donations for the
Farmer's Market, Walk `n Roll, and Summer Movie in the Park series for a total
donation amount of ,$1,443.
Mayor Stumpf removed the item from the Consent Agenda to recognize the
donors — Stellis Health, Riverside Church, West Metro Buick, Quarry Community
Church, Allina Health, and Lori and Charles Long.
Mayor Stumpf moved approval of Resolution 2017-22 accepting donations.
Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
J. Consideration to renew 2017 membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance
for $1,500.
Mayor Stumpf removed the item from the Consent Agenda and questioned the
need for membership now that Arvig is operating as manager of Fibernet. Jeff
O'Neill responded by noting its significance for networking, information
exchange, and lobbying issues.
Councilmember Gabler moved approval of renewing 2017 membership in
the MN Public Broadband Alliance for $1,500. Councilmember Fair
seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1; Mayor Stumpf voted against.
4. Regular Agenda
A. Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for `Places to
Shop' to `Places to Work' and a request for Rezoning from a B-4 (Regional
Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers and
John Chadwick.
Mayor Stumpf noted that the applicant requested that the City Council table the
item.
Councilmember Gabler moved to table the item per applicant's request.
Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Consideration of approving waiver of garbage disposal service charges for mobile
home sites.
Jeff O'Neill provided a brief background on garbage disposal service charges for
mobile home sites. He referenced a letter from Kjellberg Inc. requesting that
mobile home parks be switched from the commercial category to the single family
category in regard to fees for service. Mr. O'Neill commented on a document that
City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 6 1 9
was distributed at the meeting by Kjellberg Inc. He requested that this will need
to be reviewed by staff.
Wayne Oberg stated that the MN Attorney General's Office staff informed them
that this decision is a policy matter and there is no statutory restriction. In
addition, the City Attorney is comfortable with a denial of the request. Mr. Oberg
displayed a schedule of property taxes and garbage fees for mobile homes versus
rental units/duplexes versus rental unit/single family.
Kirk Kjellberg, representing Kjellberg Inc., addressed the City Council. Mr.
Kjellberg expressed his frustration with the current policy and would like to see
the garbage service be provided to the mobile home owners in the same manner as
other residents. In his opinion he feels that it is economic discrimination.
Discussion ensued among the City Council. Councilmember Gabler questioned
the process of paying for garbage since it isn't included in property taxes. Wayne
Oberg responded that the owners of Kjellberg Inc. receive a monthly utility bill
which include the garbage fees.
Councilmember Gabler moved to table the item to further review the
document distributed by Kjellberg Inc. at the meeting and the current city
policy. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. Consideration of authorizing notification of contract non -renewal to Veolia Water
for Wastewater Treatment Plant services.
Jeff O'Neill provided a brief overview and noted that the two-year extension of
the prior five-year agreement with Veolia expires on December 31, 2017. The (5)
year contract automatically renews for five years unless a written notice of
nonrenewal is provided 120 days prior to expiration. The notice will provide the
city the opportunity to study the contract further. Mayor Stumpf added that a
final decision should be made by the end of the year.
Councilmember Fair moved approval of authorizing notification of non-
renewal to Veolia Water for Wastewater Treatment Plant services.
Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
D. Consideration to modify Hi-Wav Liquor Hours to accommodate Sundav Sales.
Wayne Oberg provided a brief introduction and noted that due to recently passed
legislation the city is permitted to open on Sundays beginning July 2 between the
hours of 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. He commented that staff supports allowing Hi -Way
liquors to be open on two Sundays of the year — December 24 and December 31
while remaining closed all other Sundays. Randall Johnsen, Liquor Store
Manager, presented to the City Council. He spoke of operational concerns and
City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 7 1 9
quality of life. In Mr. Johnsen's opinion, the store should stay with the current
schedule, which is closed on Sunday. He is concerned about the increased costs
of opening the store on Sundays with additional revenue being unknown. Mr.
Johnsen commented that there is the thought that no additional purchases would
be made, but instead purchases would only shift from Saturday or Monday to
Sunday.
Discussion ensued among Council members. Mayor Stumpf commented that if
the choice is to stay closed because of local values, then the store should be closed
all Sundays and not open for the two holidays. Councilmember Gabler expressed
that she would support a 3 -month trial period for Sunday sales. Councilmember
Fair would not support being open every Sunday, but he agreed that there is value
in being open some Sundays. Councilmember Hilgart would support being open
a few Sundays but encouraged staff to make sure these days are advertised well.
Councilmember Davidson commented that he doesn't have a problem being open
the two Sundays but encouraged councilmembers to carefully consider the
reasoning behind the decision.
Councilmember Fair moved to approve changes to the liquor store schedule
to allow Sunday sales on December 24 and December 31 of 2017 for hours
allowed by Statute and to provide sales data at the end of the year.
Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-2; Mayor
Stumpf and Councilmember Gabler voted against for reasons listed above.
By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 8:17 p.m.
Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber
Approved:
Attest:
City Administrator
City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 8 1 9
City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 9 19
City Council Agenda 06/26/2017
2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 vavment of bills (WO)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by
Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card
registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN
Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment.
The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed
otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially
and card purchases must comply with the policy.
If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can
be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from
consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval.
Al. Budget Impact: None
A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of
$742,600.36.
2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
• Bill registers and Purchase Card registers
Accounts Payable
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
User:
Debbie.Davidson
T
Printed:
06/16/2017 - 2:55PM
Batch:
00201.06.2017 - 201.06.2017 US Bank
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
Vendor: 4263
CAYAN
Check Sequence: 1
372539
May 2017 (3) Genius Srv. Fee- cc machine renta
89.85
06/15/2017
609-49754-424100
372539
May 2017 (13,788) Trans. Fee
965.16
06/15/2017
609-49754-443980
Check Total:
1,055.01
Vendor: 3241
LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP
Check Sequence: 2
6/1/2017
June 2017
1,733.14
06/15/2017
101-00000-217066
Check Total:
1,733.14
Vendor: 1593
MN DEPT OF REVENUE - ACH
Check Sequence: 3
May
May Use Tax - General
98.38
06/15/2017
101-00000-208100
May
May Use Tax - General
-0.38
06/15/2017
101-00000-362900
May
May Waste Tax - General
717.21
06/15/2017
101-00000-208120
May
May Waste Tax - General
-0.21
06/15/2017
101-00000-362900
May
May Use Tax - MCC
5,721.41
06/15/2017
226-00000-208100
May
May Use Tax - MCC
-0.41
06/15/2017
226-45122-362900
May
May Use Tax - Water Fund
670.00
06/15/2017
601-00000-208100
May
May Use Tax - Cemetary
4.50
06/15/2017
651-00000-208100
May
May Use Tax - Cemetary
0.50
06/15/2017
651-49010-443990
May
May Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor
46,344.81
06/15/2017
609-00000-208100
May
May Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor
0.19
06/15/2017
609-49750-443990
May
May Use Tax - Hi Way Liquor
7.01
06/15/2017
609-49754-421110
May
May Use Tax - Hi Way Liquor
-0.01
06/15/2017
609-00000-362900
Check Total:
53,563.00
Vendor: 1426
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Check Sequence: 4
UB Apr 2017
UB 5250- Bridge Prk- 107 River St W
22.67
06/15/2017
101-45201-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 7224 - WWTP
1,357.48
06/15/2017
602-49480-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 7885 - Help Center
17.24
06/15/2017
217-41990-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 8086 - 4th St. Warming House
13.66
06/15/2017
101-45201-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 8114- Hi -Way Liquor
45.29
06/15/2017
609-49754-438200
Moiiii6effo Y
Reference
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: True
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 1
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
UB Apr 2017
UB 8117 - MCC
727.72
06/15/2017
226-45126-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 8119 - Fire Station
17.24
06/15/2017
101-42200-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 8120 - Bldg. hispec. Garage
13.66
06/15/2017
101-41940-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 8177- Library
44.36
06/15/2017
101-45501-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 8631- Animal Shelter -203 Chelsea Rd
13.66
06/15/2017
101-42700-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 8903- PW Shop/Clerical
431.17
06/15/2017
101-43127-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 8904 - PW Vehicle Storale
13.72
06/15/2017
101-43127-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 8905 - PW Office
13.66
06/15/2017
101-43127-438200
UB Apr 2017
UB 10128- 118 6th St W- Office Facility
13.66
06/15/2017
101-41941-438200
Check Total:
2,745.19
Vendor: 4470
US BANK - BONDS
Check Sequence: 5
0020373NS
GO Bonds 2014A - Interest
80,680.63
06/15/2017
318-47000-461100
0020373NS
GO Bonds 2014A - Interest
5,230.00
06/15/2017
703-00000-461100
0029083NS
GO Bonds 2015B - Street Reconstruction & Imp
28,750.00
06/15/2017
319-47000-461100
0040903NS
GO Bonds 2016A - Street Reconstruction & Imp
58,595.84
06/15/2017
320-47000-461100
Check Total:
173,256.47
Vendor: 2811
US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM
Check Sequence: 6
06/06/2017
Boyer - refund tax charged
-17.20
06/15/2017
101-43120-422110
06/06/2017
Grady's - misc. connectors; poly tubing
33.36
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Grady's - plugs
1.29
06/15/2017
601-49440-422100
06/06/2017
Grady's - (6) hex screw
2.40
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Grady's - GreatstuffFoaml2oz
4.59
06/15/2017
602-49490-422100
06/06/2017
Grady's - (2) bushing; teflon joint tape
5.97
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Grady's - couple galv.; (2) nipple
5.97
06/15/2017
101-43120-421990
06/06/2017
Grady's - mounting tape
7.59
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Fastenal - (200) misc. parts - Hot Box
9.68
06/15/2017
101-43120-422100
06/06/2017
Fastenal - (4) 17oz Marking Paint for prk. lots
9.88
06/15/2017
101-43120-421510
06/06/2017
Grady's -#125- couple; (3) connector; steel strap
12.75
06/15/2017
101-43120-422100
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- #130 trailer wire
15.39
06/15/2017
101-43120-422100
06/06/2017
Fastenal - safety vest
16.99
06/15/2017
101-43127-420650
06/06/2017
Home Depot - mailbox; letters- 501 4th St
20.71
06/15/2017
101-43120-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot -(3) 100pk orange stake flags
23.94
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Grady's -(4) 601b. contrete mix
26.36
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Cub - resale - (30) limes; (10) lemons
28.70
06/15/2017
609-49750-425500
06/06/2017
Martie's -1 gal. Glystar
29.20
06/15/2017
101-43120-422500
06/06/2017
Martie's -1 gal. Glystar - weed killer center medi
29.20
06/15/2017
101-43120-422500
06/06/2017
Streichers - (6) name tags - Fire
30.00
06/15/2017
101-42200-421990
06/06/2017
Pipeline - curb box repair lid w/ plug
30.45
06/15/2017
601-49440-422100
06/06/2017
Runnings - clear box; (2) 6pk paper twls; (6) 24I
34.91
06/15/2017
101-42200-421990
Reference
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: True
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 2
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number Reference
06/06/2017
Grady's - (2) padlocks; (6) 250pk keyblank
39.92
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Runnings - replacement knife blades; (7) retract.
43.42
06/15/2017
101-43127-421990
06/06/2017
Martie's -Tuff Turf- seed Dundas Circle
49.00
06/15/2017
101-43120-422500
06/06/2017
Runnings - asst. pvc coupling; asst tee pvc; etc
72.78
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Runnings - (6) 2pc rainsuit
101.94
06/15/2017
101-45201-420650
06/06/2017
Streichers - (3) Traffic Vests
104.97
06/15/2017
101-42200-421990
06/06/2017
G & K - mat srvc- #1043750053; 6043755726; E
163.36
06/15/2017
609-49754-431990
06/06/2017
Runnings -Trimmer- gas loop handle
323.96
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Zep- (2) doz. Zep2000; (2) dz. Brake wash; cs C
521.46
06/15/2017
101-43127-421600
06/06/2017
City of Monti - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- permit
596.76
06/15/2017
229-45202-453010
06/06/2017
Spectrum Supply- Nitrile gloves; pap. twls; can 1
645.29
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Martie's -30 gal drum Surge- broadleaf killer
1,858.80
06/15/2017
101-45201-421600
06/06/2017
Home Depot - threaded handle
4.98
06/15/2017
602-49490-421990
06/06/2017
Martie's -(2) Peat Moss
29.98
06/15/2017
101-45201-440900
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- (3) Nitrile D- Shop
38.97
06/15/2017
101-43120-421990
06/06/2017
General Rental - (2) 100 lb. propane- crack fillin
136.60
06/15/2017
101-43120-421990
06/06/2017
RAINWORKS.COM- invisable spray - Parks
158.30
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Site One- utility pump hose;(2) rain shut off devi
419.20
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
PayPal- (5) bbq grill replacements
599.85
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Martie's - 50 lbsTuff Turf
88.00
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Cub - Batteries
6.39
06/15/2017
101-41310-421990
06/06/2017
Amazon - Return Printer Ribbon
-139.94
06/15/2017
217-41990-421990
06/06/2017
NBP - Acrylic Sign Holders (8), Paper
118.82
06/15/2017
226-45122-421990
06/06/2017
NBP - Envelopes, Paper, Pens, Calculator
249.04
06/15/2017
217-41990-421990
06/06/2017
NBP - Tape, Post Its, Log Books
41.57
06/15/2017
101-41310-421990
06/06/2017
NBP - Label Writer Cleaning Cards
14.03
06/15/2017
101-41310-421990
06/06/2017
Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 8.251 gals @ $2.299
18.97
06/15/2017
217-41990-421200
06/06/2017
Walmart - Bananas, Cupcakes
51.95
06/15/2017
226-45125-425410
06/06/2017
Kwik Stop - Unleaded Fuel 9.670 gals @ $2.299
22.23
06/15/2017
217-41990-421200
06/06/2017
G & K - Mats Inv# 6043767101
15.60
06/15/2017
217-41990-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Caution Tape (3 pk), Duct Tape (2
35.91
06/15/2017
226-45126-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Hooks for FI
29.80
06/15/2017
226-45127-421981
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Spray for Weeds, Chain for Play
60.69
06/15/2017
226-45126-422990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Ceiling Panels, Cable Hook
28.75
06/15/2017
101-45501-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Extension Cord for Vacuums
9.68
06/15/2017
226-45126-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Hooks for FI
2.97
06/15/2017
226-45127-421981
06/06/2017
Grady's - Bolts for Basketball Hoop (6)
6.50
06/15/2017
226-45126-440100
06/06/2017
Grady's - Screws for Hooks at FI
12.20
06/15/2017
226-45126-422990
06/06/2017
Grady's - Pain Roller, Tray, Brush,
10.77
06/15/2017
226-45126-422990
06/06/2017
Grady's - Anchors, Screws, Bug Stop
10.79
06/15/2017
226-45126-422990
06/06/2017
Office Max - Farmers Market Posters Laminated
23.88
06/15/2017
226-45127-421990
06/06/2017
Office Max - Phone for FI
48.99
06/15/2017
226-45127-421981
06/06/2017
Victory Parking - Parking @ Public Sector Digit.
11.00
06/15/2017
101-41310-433100
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 3
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number Reference
06/06/2017
JP Cooke - Heavy Duty Deputy Dater Stamp (1)
77.07
06/15/2017
217-41990-421990
06/06/2017
3M Health & Service - Online Respirator Eval C
29.00
06/15/2017
101-41800-431990
06/06/2017
Domino's Pizza - Meal for Meeting 5/8
53.86
06/15/2017
101-41110-443990
06/06/2017
Lehigh Valley - Oscillating Wall Mount Fan for 1
242.98
06/15/2017
226-45124-421990
06/06/2017
US Post Office - Priority Mail 5lbs 10 oz
12.50
06/15/2017
217-41990-432200
06/06/2017
Fred Pryor Career Track - Excel Classes (2) DC
128.00
06/15/2017
101-42400-433100
06/06/2017
Grady's - All Purpose Glue, Nut
4.29
06/15/2017
226-45126-440440
06/06/2017
Horizon Pool - Certified Pool Operator Training
276.50
06/15/2017
226-45122-433100
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Hooks
38.74
06/15/2017
226-45126-422990
06/06/2017
Grady's -(2) elbow - irrigation parts
3.58
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- Gr Hose; Super Duty Grease
13.18
06/15/2017
101-43127-421990
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- Blade
17.49
06/15/2017
101-43127-421990
06/06/2017
Cub - resale - (20) limes; (5) lemons
18.30
06/15/2017
609-49750-425500
06/06/2017
Grady's -valve sprinkler
19.99
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Grady's -irrigation parts for downtown planters
25.70
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
General Rental - #140- (33 lbs) propane fill
27.13
06/15/2017
101-43120-421990
06/06/2017
Dakota Supply Group- curb bx repair lid w/ plug
30.45
06/15/2017
601-49440-421990
06/06/2017
Cub - Gatorade- Fire Dept.
33.95
06/15/2017
101-42200-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - sprinkler wire - 7th St/Hwy 25
37.17
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Monti RV- soft bi-level brush; Por -fit Disc. Sub
45.56
06/15/2017
101-43127-421100
06/06/2017
Cub - resale - (60) limes
47.40
06/15/2017
609-49750-425500
06/06/2017
DISH- June service
64.16
06/15/2017
609-49754-432500
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- #124- (4) oil/grease seals
84.68
06/15/2017
101-43120-422100
06/06/2017
Auto Value -#124- battery; axle bearing; taper cu
92.95
06/15/2017
101-43120-422100
06/06/2017
Spectrum Supply -(12) cowhide gloves; (2) bx ea
110.10
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Spectrum Supply -credit (12) pigskin gloves
-149.28
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Spectrum Supply(12) XL cowhide gloves; (24) I
161.04
06/15/2017
101-43120-420650
06/06/2017
Dyna - shop supplies- (5) cryobits; (50) cap scre,
157.87
06/15/2017
101-43127-421990
06/06/2017
Sherwin Williams - (20) 5 gal. white
206.00
06/15/2017
101-45201-422990
06/06/2017
TRS- (12) 600pk Labels;(6) 250ct labels
283.87
06/15/2017
609-49754-421990
06/06/2017
Elk River Landfill- (2.55) T- MSW- Farm Junk
356.42
06/15/2017
101-43127-431990
06/06/2017
Aramark - uniforms April 2017- Parks
109.92
06/15/2017
101-45201-441700
06/06/2017
Aramark - uniforms April 2017- Sewer
72.72
06/15/2017
602-49490-441700
06/06/2017
Aramark - uniforms April 2017- Water
72.72
06/15/2017
601-49440-441700
06/06/2017
Aramark - uniforms April 2017- PW
181.22
06/15/2017
101-43120-441700
06/06/2017
Aramark - shop towels -April 2017- PW
168.14
06/15/2017
101-43127-421990
06/06/2017
WHCE- Street Light contract 3/16-4/15
1,964.05
06/15/2017
101-43160-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE- Sunset Ponds 321 kWh
54.04
06/15/2017
602-49490-438100
06/06/2017
WHCE- 1645 & 1675 CR 39
37.43
06/15/2017
602-49490-438100
06/06/2017
WHCE- DMV
19.95
06/15/2017
217-41990-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE- 2171 W River St- Parks
36.45
06/15/2017
101-45201-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE- Fire Dept
27.95
06/15/2017
101-42200-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE-5980 Jason Ave- Water
19.95
06/15/2017
601-49440-431900
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 4
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number Reference
06/06/2017
WHCE-MCC
27.95
06/15/2017
226-45126-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE- 207 Chelsea Rd.
32.95
06/15/2017
601-49440-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE- 209 Cedar St.
29.95
06/15/2017
601-49440-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE- 132 E Broadway St.
29.95
06/15/2017
601-49440-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE- 107 River St. W
19.95
06/15/2017
101-45201-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE- Hi -Way Liquor June 2017
21.32
06/15/2017
609-49754-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE- MCC June 2017
19.95
06/15/2017
226-45126-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE- 200 Dundas Rd June 2017
29.95
06/15/2017
601-49440-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE- 909Golf Crs. Rd June 2017
19.95
06/15/2017
101-43110-431900
06/06/2017
WHCE-- General Street Lighting
1,292.60
06/15/2017
101-43160-438100
06/06/2017
Advanced Disposal - April 2017
37,776.25
06/15/2017
101-43230-438400
06/06/2017
Advanced Disposal - April 2017 - Recycling
12,559.95
06/15/2017
101-43230-438400
06/06/2017
Advanced Disposal - April 2017
35.80
06/15/2017
101-43127-438400
06/06/2017
Advanced Disposal - April 2017
47.74
06/15/2017
101-45201-438400
06/06/2017
Advanced Disposal - April 2017
23.87
06/15/2017
101-45201-438400
06/06/2017
Advanced Disposal - April 2017
113.38
06/15/2017
602-49480-438400
06/06/2017
Advanced Disposal - April 2017
247.48
06/15/2017
226-45122-438400
06/06/2017
Advanced Disposal - April 2017
11.93
06/15/2017
101-45501-431990
06/06/2017
Advanced Disposal - April 2017
23.87
06/15/2017
609-49754-438400
06/06/2017
Advanced Disposal - April 2017
23.87
06/15/2017
101-45201-438400
06/06/2017
Walmart - File Folders
8.44
06/15/2017
226-45122-421990
06/06/2017
Walmart - Protein Bars, Apples, Bananas for Coi
37.26
06/15/2017
226-45125-425410
06/06/2017
Walmart - First Aid Kit
5.87
06/15/2017
226-45124-421990
06/06/2017
Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (20)
1,143.68
06/15/2017
101-45130-444140
06/06/2017
Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (18)
1,512.37
06/15/2017
101-45130-444140
06/06/2017
Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (4)
367.94
06/15/2017
101-45130-444140
06/06/2017
Runnings - Tires for Two Wheeler (2)
39.98
06/15/2017
226-45126-421990
06/06/2017
Constant Contact - Monthly Email Service
60.00
06/15/2017
226-45122-430900
06/06/2017
Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription WO
36.99
06/15/2017
101-41520-443300
06/06/2017
Office Max - Printer for MCC at Prairie Center (
199.99
06/15/2017
702-00000-424100
06/06/2017
Monti Chamber - April Lunch JT
15.00
06/15/2017
213-46301-443300
06/06/2017
Monti Chamber - May Lunch RL
15.00
06/15/2017
101-41310-443990
06/06/2017
Grady's - Painting Brush; Tape
18.48
06/15/2017
226-45126-421990
06/06/2017
Grady's - Screws & Anchors
13.99
06/15/2017
226-45126-421990
06/06/2017
Grady's - O Ring for Sink
1.29
06/15/2017
226-45126-422990
06/06/2017
Grady's - Ear Plugs
3.49
06/15/2017
226-45126-421990
06/06/2017
Sherwin Williams - 5 Gal Paint, 1 Gal Paint, & S
374.39
06/15/2017
226-45126-440100
06/06/2017
Target - Food for Special Council Meeting
36.57
06/15/2017
101-41110-443990
06/06/2017
Cub - Snacks for CPR/AED Training Session
18.53
06/15/2017
101-41800-443990
06/06/2017
Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.226 gals @ $2.359
21.76
06/15/2017
217-41990-421200
06/06/2017
Randy's - Shredding Service (DMV)
17.62
06/15/2017
217-41990-431990
06/06/2017
Randy's - Shredding Service (CH)
17.62
06/15/2017
101-41310-431990
06/06/2017
Paula Paulsen - Draping for Wedding
425.00
06/15/2017
226-45123-431990
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 5
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number Reference
06/06/2017
Verizon - March 21 - April 20
26.02
06/15/2017
101-43120-432100
06/06/2017
Verizon - March 21 - April 20
140.04
06/15/2017
101-42200-432100
06/06/2017
Verizon - April 4 - May 3
50.71
06/15/2017
101-42400-432100
06/06/2017
Verizon - April 4 - May 3
31.27
06/15/2017
226-45122-432100
06/06/2017
Verizon - April 4 - May 3
104.82
06/15/2017
101-43120-432100
06/06/2017
Verizon - April 4 - May 3
45.99
06/15/2017
601-49440-432100
06/06/2017
NBP - Paper
299.56
06/15/2017
101-41310-421990
06/06/2017
NBP - Laminating Pouches, Markers, Plates, Let
250.80
06/15/2017
101-41310-421990
06/06/2017
NBP - Clipboard, Paper
4.85
06/15/2017
226-45122-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Gift Card for Safety Bingo Prize
35.00
06/15/2017
101-41800-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Air Mover Fan
199.00
06/15/2017
226-45126-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Toilet Seats (2)
47.96
06/15/2017
226-45126-440100
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Door Stops (2 pks)
8.42
06/15/2017
226-45126-422990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Wall Scrappers for Waxing Projec
17.93
06/15/2017
226-45126-421990
06/06/2017
G & K - Uniforms, Towels, Mops (3 invoices)
221.13
06/15/2017
226-45126-431990
06/06/2017
G & K - Uniforms, Towels, Mops (3 invoices)
148.14
06/15/2017
226-45126-431990
06/06/2017
Mail Finance - Postage Machine Lease Payment
564.33
06/15/2017
101-41310-441500
06/06/2017
Monti Napa - Plug & Bolts for Scrubber
2.91
06/15/2017
226-45126-422990
06/06/2017
Verizon - April 4 - May 3
45.99
06/15/2017
602-49490-432100
06/06/2017
Grady's -Padlock
13.99
06/15/2017
101-42200-421990
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- filter for generator lift station
17.18
06/15/2017
602-49490-422100
06/06/2017
Monti Napa -(2) filter for generator lift station
20.66
06/15/2017
602-49490-422100
06/06/2017
Grady's - saw hole; drill bit
18.58
06/15/2017
101-43127-421990
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- #113; 109- (2) connnectors
19.38
06/15/2017
101-43120-422110
06/06/2017
Facebook- Wine Sale Post Boost
20.00
06/15/2017
609-49754-434990
06/06/2017
Fastenal -crimp tool; (100) cable tie
24.58
06/15/2017
601-49440-421990
06/06/2017
Fastenal -4th St. Hoops- Brite Mark; misc.
26.44
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Runnings -flashlight
26.71
06/15/2017
602-49490-421990
06/06/2017
Auto Value -trailers- (3) 7 Pole RV Blade
29.97
06/15/2017
101-43120-422100
06/06/2017
Cub - resale - (50) limes; (10) lemons
49.40
06/15/2017
609-49750-425500
06/06/2017
Home Depot -(3) 16" Drain Spade - Cedar
104.91
06/15/2017
101-43130-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot -(100 lb) propane fill
136.60
06/15/2017
101-43120-421990
06/06/2017
Sherwin Williams - Bridge Vandalism -(5) 5 gal
229.45
06/15/2017
101-45201-422990
06/06/2017
Sherwin Williams - return (5) 5 gal Yellow 4/13/
-80.00
06/15/2017
101-45201-422990
06/06/2017
G & K - mat srvc-# 6043767103; 6043772822; E
162.02
06/15/2017
609-49754-431990
06/06/2017
Safety Kleen- (8) waste combustable liquid
192.01
06/15/2017
101-43127-431990
06/06/2017
Big Lake Lumber- ZPARKS-ELLPRK - Flex Wi
198.82
06/15/2017
229-45202-453010
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- shop- 5W30 qrt oil; misc. filters; et
259.80
06/15/2017
101-43127-422120
06/06/2017
Arctic Glacier - resale inv. #1956712812; 19567
878.96
06/15/2017
609-49750-425500
06/06/2017
TRS- Total Care Keystroke- renwl; renewal Soft
1,485.56
06/15/2017
609-49754-431900
06/06/2017
Martie's -adopt a park- 7 invoices- plants
2,461.83
06/15/2017
101-45201-440900
06/06/2017
NightHawk- Fire Alarm Panel replaced- New Ve
1,475.95
06/15/2017
101-42200-431900
06/06/2017
NightHawk- Security monitor/cellular- June; par
84.28
06/15/2017
101-42200-431900
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 6
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number Reference
06/06/2017
Cub - resale - (25) limes; (25) lemons
39.50
06/15/2017
609-49750-425500
06/06/2017
Cub - resale - (30) limes; (10) lemons
33.60
06/15/2017
609-49750-425500
06/06/2017
Cub - Paper Plates for Concession
9.98
06/15/2017
226-45125-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - ZPARKS ELLPRK - 2x4xl2 - (1:
64.08
06/15/2017
229-45202-453010
06/06/2017
Home Depot - ZPARKS ELLPRK - Various Boa
471.27
06/15/2017
229-45202-453010
06/06/2017
Home Depot - ZPARKS ELLPRK - 2x8x8 (5); 2
152.23
06/15/2017
229-45202-453010
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Door Bell for Front Desk
16.97
06/15/2017
226-45122-421990
06/06/2017
Home Depot - Smoke/CO2 Detectors, Door Aler
238.81
06/15/2017
226-45127-421981
06/06/2017
NBP - Batteries, Tape, Staples, Candy
136.34
06/15/2017
609-49754-421990
06/06/2017
Walmart - Food for Training Session
17.80
06/15/2017
101-41800-443990
06/06/2017
Walmart - Lighters for Candles for Weddings (4)
4.00
06/15/2017
226-45123-421990
06/06/2017
Walmart - 3M Hooks, Curtain, Dry Erase Board
40.19
06/15/2017
226-45127-421981
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- Lens (3)
7.47
06/15/2017
101-43120-422100
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- Sealer for Sweeper (2)
36.32
06/15/2017
101-43120-422100
06/06/2017
Grady's - Rings & Nuts (4)
0.72
06/15/2017
226-45126-422990
06/06/2017
Grady's - Knife, Blades,
13.17
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Grady's - Lube for Pool Equip; Graphite for Doo
9.96
06/15/2017
226-45126-421990
06/06/2017
Grady's - Keys (2); Hose
48.97
06/15/2017
226-45126-421990
06/06/2017
Target - Food for Small Area Study Open House
23.75
06/15/2017
101-41110-443990
06/06/2017
Target - Food for Small Area Study Open House
23.75
06/15/2017
101-41910-443990
06/06/2017
Target - Food for Small Area Study Open House
23.75
06/15/2017
213-46301-443990
06/06/2017
Tavern @ Wild Marsh - Admin Luncheon JO
16.35
06/15/2017
101-41310-433100
06/06/2017
Tavern @ Wild Marsh - Admin Luncheon JO
0.37
06/15/2017
101-00000-115030
06/06/2017
Monti Printing - Observation Notices (2,000)
336.00
06/15/2017
101-42400-421990
06/06/2017
When To Work.com - Staff Scheduling Program
80.00
06/15/2017
226-45127-421981
06/06/2017
Net Brands Media - Wristbands for Walk & Roll
148.03
06/15/2017
226-45122-421990
06/06/2017
Net Brands Media - Wristbands for FI
71.90
06/15/2017
226-45127-421981
06/06/2017
MRO Supply - Vinyl Floor Mat (5)
999.00
06/15/2017
226-45124-421990
06/06/2017
Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.906 gals @ $2.399
23.76
06/15/2017
217-41990-421200
06/06/2017
Dollar Tree - Napkins
1.00
06/15/2017
217-41990-421990
06/06/2017
Dollar Tree - Giveaway Items for Walk & Roll
18.00
06/15/2017
217-41990-434990
06/06/2017
Martie's - Tretlan (2)
70.00
06/15/2017
101-45201-421600
06/06/2017
Runnings - Chain 14"
16.95
06/15/2017
101-43127-422100
06/06/2017
Cub - Juice for Training
8.55
06/15/2017
101-41800-443990
06/06/2017
Domino's Pizza - Meal for Open House 5/31
68.03
06/15/2017
226-45127-421981
06/06/2017
Streichers - Face Cap Assembly & Lamp
19.98
06/15/2017
101-42200-421990
06/06/2017
Dakota Supply Group - Valve for Washing Hose
28.92
06/15/2017
101-42200-422100
06/06/2017
Fastenal - Safety Vest, T Shirt, Weld Gloves, Eye
75.34
06/15/2017
101-43120-420650
06/06/2017
General Credit Forms - Credit Card Paper
95.93
06/15/2017
217-41990-421990
06/06/2017
Nat'l Recreation & Park Assoc - Membership Du
165.00
06/15/2017
226-45122-443300
06/06/2017
Trusted Employees - Background Checks (4)
106.00
06/15/2017
226-45122-431990
06/06/2017
Trusted Employees - Background Checks (2)
79.00
06/15/2017
101-45201-431990
06/06/2017
Trusted Employees - Background Checks (2)
74.00
06/15/2017
101-43120-431990
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 7
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number Reference
06/06/2017
Trusted Employees - Background Checks (3)
69.00
06/15/2017
609-49754-431990
06/06/2017
Trusted Employees - Background Checks (1)
18.50
06/15/2017
601-49440-431990
06/06/2017
Trusted Employees - Background Checks (1)
18.50
06/15/2017
602-49490-431990
06/06/2017
MN Pollution Control - WWTP WaterApplicatic
1,240.00
06/15/2017
602-49480-443700
06/06/2017
Dakota Paper - First Aid Items
44.14
06/15/2017
226-45122-421990
06/06/2017
Dakota Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supp]
1,974.27
06/15/2017
226-45126-421990
06/06/2017
Dakota Paper - Concession Supplies
98.96
06/15/2017
226-45125-421990
06/06/2017
Dakota Paper - Trash Can Liners
29.64
06/15/2017
101-41941-421990
06/06/2017
Dakota Paper - Trash Can Liners
26.14
06/15/2017
101-45501-421990
06/06/2017
Fastenal - Ear Plugs (200)
43.72
06/15/2017
101-43120-420650
06/06/2017
Home Depot - (4) 601b concrete mix
12.40
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Runnings - valve in line; solenoid replacement -1
27.48
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Auto Value -trailer- (4) grease seals
47.96
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Dakota Supply Group -(40) pvc pipe; rainshine t
51.27
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Grady's - Irrig. & sprayer- Mag 2" combo; valve
53.14
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Midway Iron & Metal- ZPARKS-ELLSPRK-8' s
88.80
06/15/2017
229-45202-453010
06/06/2017
Home Depot - (40) 801b concrete mix
172.00
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Home Depot -ZPARKS-ELLPRK - Brt. Smth Pa
336.35
06/15/2017
229-45202-453010
06/06/2017
Rivard Co.- Central Wood Prod- (100) yds mulcl
1,604.95
06/15/2017
101-45201-422500
06/06/2017
Grady's -(2) 249-L Soc CP; (2) washer flat
1.14
06/15/2017
101-42200-421990
06/06/2017
Grady's 4132- padlock
12.99
06/15/2017
101-43120-422100
06/06/2017
Amazon - Time Card Rack - Buddy Products
31.11
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- UHl- Mul-Tow Con; connector - F
37.48
06/15/2017
101-42200-422110
06/06/2017
Amazon - Displays2go- acrylic sign holder
38.99
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Monti Napa- #132 & shop- Battery; grease can;,
102.72
06/15/2017
101-43120-422100
06/06/2017
OSC- (2) Blade; (5) Elctd: T80/T60; (5) shld Ca
234.12
06/15/2017
101-43127-421520
06/06/2017
Northern Tool- (2) covered BBQ Grill Smoker -1
709.98
06/15/2017
101-45201-421650
06/06/2017
Grady's - (4) keyblank - 1/2
3.98
06/15/2017
601-49440-422300
06/06/2017
Grady's - (4) keyblank - 1/2
3.98
06/15/2017
602-49490-421990
06/06/2017
Grady's-ZPARKS- ELLPRK- couple; (2) elbow
15.77
06/15/2017
229-45202-453010
06/06/2017
Home Depot -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Alum Square
19.93
06/15/2017
229-45202-453010
06/06/2017
Home Depot -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (4) RZB 16B
103.88
06/15/2017
229-45202-453010
06/06/2017
Cub - Walk & Roll water tasting- (5) cups; (2 1)
33.60
06/15/2017
601-49440-421990
06/06/2017
General Rental - (2) 20# propane fill
35.56
06/15/2017
101-43120-421990
06/06/2017
MN Dept. Health- Monitoring Well Permit 5893,
50.00
06/15/2017
601-49440-443700
06/06/2017
Facebook- Farmer's Market Ad
5.00
06/15/2017
226-00000-220100
06/06/2017
US Post Office - Postage Stamps for Mailing
40.38
06/15/2017
101-41910-432200
06/06/2017
Monti Chamber - City Float in Riverfest Parade
50.00
06/15/2017
101-41310-443990
06/06/2017
Amazon - Batteries (3/48 pks); Vinyl Chair Mat
73.51
06/15/2017
226-45122-421990
06/06/2017
Amazon - Lego's for FI
160.91
06/15/2017
226-45127-421981
06/06/2017
US Bank Quarterly Rebate
-5,104.87
06/15/2017
101-00000-362970
06/06/2017
NBP - utx- Riverfest Parade candy
393.34
06/15/2017
609-49754-421990
06/06/2017
Cap City Parking - Parking Fee @ MN DEED M
11.00
06/15/2017
213-46301-433100
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 8
Invoice No
06/06/2017
Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Grand View Lodge - EDAM Meeting Lodging (F 340.38 06/15/2017 213-46301-433100
Check Total: 86,524.16
Total for Check Run: 318,876.97
Total of Number of Checks:
The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment.
Date: 6/26/17 Approved by
Mayor Brian Stumpf
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 9
Accounts Payable
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
User: Julie.Cheney
Printed: 06/21/2017 - 2:09PM
Batch: 00204.06.2017 - 204.06.2017 AP
Invoice No Description
Vendor:
2087
ALL WAYS HEATING AND AC INC
5772
809.45
Replaced Motor & Capacitor
Check Total:
Vendor:
1977
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
70128
(5) Minitor V Standard Charger
101-42200-421990
238.00
Check Total:
Vendor:
3991
ANOKA RAMSEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE
00417865
CPR & AED Training 5/23 - Contract #849
700.00
Check Total:
Vendor:
1039
AQUA LOGIC INC
46308
Sand & Lateral Replacement
Check Total:
Vendor:
3491
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
3183226
850.00
resale- beer
Check Total:
Vendor:
4502
ARVIG
6/8/2017
Battery Backup/Surge Protector/Server/Desktop
6/8/2017
157.50
IT Services - May/June 2017
Check Total:
Vendor:
1062
BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY
450846
(3) cylinder gas for forklift
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
Check Sequence: 1
809.45
06/27/2017
226-45126-431990
809.45
Check Sequence: 2
238.00
06/27/2017
101-42200-421990
238.00
Check Sequence: 3
700.00
06/27/2017
101-41800-431960
700.00
Check Sequence: 4
850.00
06/27/2017
226-45126-431990
850.00
Check Sequence: 5
157.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
157.50
Check Sequence: 6
3,558.48
06/27/2017
702-00000-424100
7,215.00
06/27/2017
702-00000-431990
10,773.48
Check Sequence: 7
58.00
06/27/2017
101-43120-421200
Moiiii6effo Y
Reference
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: True
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 1
Invoice No Description
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
Reference
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 2
Check Total:
58.00
Vendor:
1065
BELLBOY CORPORATION
Check Sequence: 8
ACH Enabled: True
59147000
freight
-2.20
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
59147000
resale - liquor credit inv. #59118800
-92.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
59220400
resale - liquor
546.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
59220400
freight
11.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
59322600
resale - liquor
905.10
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
59322600
freight
16.13
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
95897300
resale - liquor credit
-2.63
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
95910500
resale - mix
60.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
95910500
freight
0.27
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
95974900
freight
0.39
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
95974900
resale - mix
84.49
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
Check Total:
1,526.55
Vendor:
1067
BERNICK'S
Check Sequence: 9
ACH Enabled: False
63268
resale - soda pop
85.60
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
63268
resale -juice
32.80
06/27/2017
609-49750-425500
63269
resale - beer
1,922.55
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
64092
resale - pop, gatorade, water, juice
478.55
06/27/2017
226-45125-425410
66511
resale - soda pop
160.25
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
66511
resale -juice
32.80
06/27/2017
609-49750-425500
67138
resale - pop, gatorade, water, juice
300.00
06/27/2017
226-45125-425410
68512
resale - beer
2,484.75
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
Check Total:
5,497.30
Vendor:
1080
BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC
Check Sequence: 10
ACH Enabled: False
58110
UB May 2017 Invoices - (3773) FNM Insert
37.73
06/27/2017
656-49870-434990
58110
UB May 2017 Invoices - (3773) Print, Fold, Env
553.08
06/27/2017
601-49440-431800
58110
UB May 2017 Invoices - (3773) Print, Fold, Env
553.09
06/27/2017
602-49490-431800
Check Total:
1,143.90
Vendor:
3632
BRIAN BRAMLEY
Check Sequence: 11
ACH Enabled: True
8881
Emergency Response - (7) Extication gloves
281.74
06/27/2017
101-42200-421120
8886
Emergency Response - (4) Helmets
1,148.81
06/27/2017
101-42200-421120
8899
Emergency Response - (5) PAC II P-84 Hood
199.35
06/27/2017
101-42200-421120
8903
Emergency Response - (2) Firedex FDXL leathe
601.16
06/27/2017
101-42200-421120
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 2
Invoice No Description
Check Total:
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM)
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
2,231.06
633.50
150.26
12.37
130.50
1,520.35
524.27
36.59
36.00
83.10
3,126.94
961.00
160.00
320.00
320.00
126.62
64.00
1,951.62
15,133.95
226.80
18,291.85
64.20
-47.25
33,669.55
75.60
75.60
7.91
7.91
Check Sequence: 12
06/27/2017 609-49750-425100
06/27/2017 609-49750-425300
06/27/2017 609-49750-433300
06/27/2017 609-49750-425200
06/27/2017 609-49750-425100
06/27/2017 609-49750-425300
06/27/2017 609-49750-433300
06/27/2017 609-49750-425400
06/27/2017 609-49750-425200
Check Sequence: 13
06/27/2017 101-41610-430400
06/27/2017 101-00000-220110
06/27/2017 101-41910-430400
06/27/2017 101-00000-220110
06/27/2017 101-42400-430400
06/27/2017 400-43300-451020
Check Sequence: 14
06/27/2017 609-49750-425200
06/27/2017 609-49750-425400
06/27/2017 609-49750-425200
06/27/2017 609-49750-425400
06/27/2017 609-49750-425200
Check Sequence: 15
06/27/2017 226-45124-421600
Check Sequence: 16
06/27/2017 101-41110-431990
Reference
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
Page 3
Check Total:
Vendor: 4328
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPII
1080646590
resale - liquor
1080646590
resale - wine
1080646590
freight
1080646591
resale - beer
1080649444
resale - liquor
1080649444
resale - wine
1080649444
freight
1080649444
resale - wine n/a
1080649445
resale - beer
Check Total:
Vendor: 1091
CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA
2348-000G 178
General Legal - May 2017
2348-000G 178
201706 - Prairie Ponds PUD - May 2017
2348-000G 178
Planning & Zoning - May 2017
2348-000G 178
201720 - -May 2017
2348-001 G 105
General Code Enforcement - May 2017
2348-125G 21
16C006 - Church of St.Henrys/Fallon Ave Impro
Check Total:
Vendor: 4646
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P.
1906903
resale - beer
1906903
resale - beer n/a
1915534
resale - beer
1915534
resale - mix
365-60
resale - beer credit
Check Total:
Vendor: 1106
CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC
00125485
Bulk Carbon Dioxide (243 lbs)
Check Total:
Vendor: 4315
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
6/1/2017
Digital Receiver
Check Total:
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM)
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
2,231.06
633.50
150.26
12.37
130.50
1,520.35
524.27
36.59
36.00
83.10
3,126.94
961.00
160.00
320.00
320.00
126.62
64.00
1,951.62
15,133.95
226.80
18,291.85
64.20
-47.25
33,669.55
75.60
75.60
7.91
7.91
Check Sequence: 12
06/27/2017 609-49750-425100
06/27/2017 609-49750-425300
06/27/2017 609-49750-433300
06/27/2017 609-49750-425200
06/27/2017 609-49750-425100
06/27/2017 609-49750-425300
06/27/2017 609-49750-433300
06/27/2017 609-49750-425400
06/27/2017 609-49750-425200
Check Sequence: 13
06/27/2017 101-41610-430400
06/27/2017 101-00000-220110
06/27/2017 101-41910-430400
06/27/2017 101-00000-220110
06/27/2017 101-42400-430400
06/27/2017 400-43300-451020
Check Sequence: 14
06/27/2017 609-49750-425200
06/27/2017 609-49750-425400
06/27/2017 609-49750-425200
06/27/2017 609-49750-425400
06/27/2017 609-49750-425200
Check Sequence: 15
06/27/2017 226-45124-421600
Check Sequence: 16
06/27/2017 101-41110-431990
Reference
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
Page 3
Invoice No Description
Vendor:
3831
RAELYNN COOK
6/20/2017
Mileage Reimbursement - Payroll Northstar Cha
Check Sequence: 17
Check Total:
Vendor:
4329
MITCH COOPMAN
06/03/17
101-41520-433100
(3) donuts- Cub reimbursed
Check Total:
Vendor:
4694
CUNNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE IN
47760
Small Area Plan Through May 2017
Check Sequence: 18
Check Total:
Vendor:
2935
CUSTOMIZED FIRE RESCUE TRAINING IN(
1049
101-42200-421990
Cargill Rmbrs.- Confined Space; Haz.Mat; High
1050
MBFTE Rmbrs.- Active Shooter Response; Rea(
Check Total:
Vendor:
1129
DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC
1283856
Check Sequence: 19
resale -beer
1283867
False
resale -liquor
1283867
213-46301-431990
resale -mix
149133
resale -rootbeer
149588
resale -beer
150218
resale -beer
150269
Check Sequence: 20
resale -beer
150460
False
resale -beer
150644
101-42200-433100
resale -beer
150644
resale -beer n/a
150701
101-42200-433100
resale -beer credit inv. 150460
151027
resale -beer
Check Total:
Vendor: 4475 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP
D083706 Freon - 301b Cylinder
Check Total:
Vendor: 1131 DAMA METAL PRODUCTS INC
14521 S-3 Model F.D. Key Box w/Tamper SW - For R(
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
Reference
Check Sequence: 17
ACH
Enabled:
True
33.01
06/27/2017
101-41520-433100
33.01
Check Sequence: 18
ACH
Enabled:
True
26.97
06/27/2017
101-42200-421990
26.97
Check Sequence: 19
ACH
Enabled:
False
25,000.00
06/27/2017
213-46301-431990
25,000.00
Check Sequence: 20
ACH
Enabled:
False
2,000.00
06/27/2017
101-42200-433100
2,200.00
06/27/2017
101-42200-433100
4,200.00
Check Sequence: 21
ACH
Enabled:
True
112.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
41,853.85
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
283.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
74.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
1,890.30
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
2,362.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
962.40
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
680.83
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
2,824.03
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
33.60
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
-9.82
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
687.30
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
51,753.99
Check Sequence: 22
ACH
Enabled:
True
898.58
06/27/2017
226-45126-440440
898.58
Check Sequence: 23
ACH
Enabled:
False
2,060.00
06/27/2017
101-42400-421990
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 4
Invoice No Description
Amount
Check Total:
Vendor: 1833
DAN & JERRY'S GREENHOUSEES INCORP(
357592
(5) 10" planters; (2) l Oct. Proven winners- East I
736.50
Check Total:
Vendor: 1153
ECM PUBLISHERS INC
498947
Tax Abatement Hearing Ad# 693393
279.85
Check Total:
Vendor: 1166
ESRI
93299910
9/1/17 - 8/31/18 ArcGIS Desktop/Server Workgr
242.38
Check Total:
Vendor: 1170
FASTENAL COMPANY
MNMON102124
(30) 40# Floor Dry Clay
MNMON102272
picnic table hardware
MNMON102314
picnic table hardware
06/27/2017
Check Total:
Vendor: 2561
FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516
0242573
Neptune Repair
0242815
T10 Meter
0242822
LF Meter Flg. Kit; (2) Coup. w/ wire
0243049
LF 2 Meter Flg. Kit
Check Total:
Vendor: 2273
FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH
6/8/2017
City Hall Phone - June 2017
6/8/2017
MCC Phone - June 2017
6/8/2017
Ballfrelds Phone - June 2017
6/8/2017
DMV Phone - June 2017
6/8/2017
Hi Way Liquor Phone - June 2017
6/8/2017
Fire Hall Phone - June 2017
6/8/2017
Public Works Phone - June 2017
6/8/2017
Parks Phone - June 2017
6/8/2017
Prairie Center Phone - June 2017
6/8/2017
Sheriff Phone - June 2017
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
Reference
06/27/2017
2,060.00
736.50
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
19.43
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
279.85
06/27/2017
Check Sequence: 24
ACH Enabled:
False
174.75
242.38
06/27/2017
101-45201-440900
290.93
06/27/2017
174.75
113.73
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
14.16
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
69.73
06/27/2017
Check Sequence: 25
ACH Enabled:
True
1,052.22
06/27/2017
101-41310-435100
1,052.22
Check Sequence: 26
ACH Enabled:
False
2,200.00
06/27/2017
101-43111-430910
2,200.00
Check Sequence: 27
ACH Enabled:
False
204.00
06/27/2017
101-42200-421990
34.05
06/27/2017
101-45201-421650
43.54
06/27/2017
101-45201-421650
281.59
Check Sequence: 28
ACH Enabled:
False
370.00
06/27/2017
601-49440-422100
255.15
06/27/2017
601-49440-422710
188.28
06/27/2017
601-49440-422710
146.53
06/27/2017
601-49440-422710
il11%Ti
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 5
Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: True
685.84
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
736.50
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
19.43
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
279.85
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
286.63
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
242.38
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
290.93
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
113.73
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
14.16
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
69.73
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 5
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
Reference
6/8/2017
City Hall Internet - June 2017
124.95
06/27/2017
702-00000-432300
6/8/2017
MCC Internet - June 2017
10.00
06/27/2017
702-00000-432300
6/8/2017
Ballfields Internet - June 2017
10.00
06/27/2017
702-00000-432300
6/8/2017
DMV Internet - June 2017
41.95
06/27/2017
702-00000-432300
6/8/2017
Hi Way Liquor Internet - June 2017
41.95
06/27/2017
702-00000-432300
6/8/2017
Fire Hall Internet - June 2017
41.95
06/27/2017
702-00000-432300
6/8/2017
Animal Shelter Internet - June 2017
29.95
06/27/2017
702-00000-432300
6/8/2017
Public Works Internet - June 2017
69.95
06/27/2017
702-00000-432300
6/8/2017
Sheriff Internet - June 2017
41.95
06/27/2017
702-00000-432300
6/8/2017
City Hall Cable - June 2017
12.95
06/27/2017
101-41310-431990
6/8/2017
MCC Cable - June 2017
319.39
06/27/2017
226-45127-432500
6/8/2017
City Hall Data Hosting - June 2017
500.00
06/27/2017
702-00000-431900
6/8/2017
City Hall Service Contract - June 2017
250.00
06/27/2017
702-00000-431900
Check Total:
4,234.17
Vendor:
4391
WIL GOETSCH
Check Sequence: 30
ACH Enabled: True
6/14/2017
Referee Mens Hockey - 5/10 & 5/14 Adjustment
40.00
06/27/2017
226-45127-431990
Check Total:
40.00
Vendor:
4720
JIM HACKENDORF
Check Sequence: 31
ACH Enabled: False
6/13/17
Escrow Refund - 8273 Gatewater/Carisle
2,000.00
06/27/2017
101-00000-220110
Check Total:
2,000.00
Vendor:
4218
HOHENSTEINS, INC
Check Sequence: 32
ACH Enabled: False
899006
resale - beer
1,162.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
Check Total:
1,162.50
Vendor:
1242
HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE
Check Sequence: 33
ACH Enabled: True
06182017
acct. 1400-017-223-399 fule slips 5/18-6/11/17
439.64
06/27/2017
101-42200-421200
Check Total:
439.64
Vendor:
1253
J H LARSON COMPANY
Check Sequence: 34
ACH Enabled: False
S101503856.001
250 W Lamps (24)
170.64
06/27/2017
226-45126-421990
Check Total:
170.64
Vendor:
3369
JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC
Check Sequence: 35
ACH Enabled: True
3137
Simpson- 5/8/17
400.00
06/27/2017
651-49010-431150
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 6
Invoice No Description
Vendor: 1260
Check Total:
Vendor: 1259
JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING
2669168
resale - beer
2689653
resale - beer
2689653
resale - beer n/a
2689653
freight
2689680
resale - beer
5742576
Check Total:
Vendor: 1260
JME OF MONTICELLO INC
SYS42189
Parts- Engine 4- suspension & frame- replace ste
SYS42189
Labor Engine 4- suspension & frame- replace ste
Check Total:
Vendor: 1263
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
5742575
resale - liquor
5742575
freight
5742576
freight
5742576
resale - mix
5742576
resale - wine
5742577
resale - beer
5745304
resale - liquor
5745304
freight
5745305
freight
5745305
resale - mix
5745305
resale - wine
5745306
resale - beer
5746753
freight
5746753
resale - liquor
5746754
resale - wine
5746754
resale - mix
5746754
freight
5746755
resale- beer
5748173
resale- liquor
5748173
freight
5748174
freight
5748174
resale - wine
5748174
resale - wine n/a
5750906
freight
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
400.00
Check Sequence: 36
129.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
2,969.90
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
105.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
3.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
3,347.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
6,554.90
Check Sequence: 37
2,913.05
06/27/2017
101-42200-440500
805.00
06/27/2017
101-42200-440500
3,718.05
Check Sequence: 38
1,059.59
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
14.16
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
28.80
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
129.34
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
799.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
73.80
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
6,359.41
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
80.64
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
27.36
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
35.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
752.80
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
73.80
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
98.51
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
6,906.45
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
1,627.10
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
114.70
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
54.72
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
87.96
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
1,484.62
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
19.08
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
39.02
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
1,580.25
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
28.85
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
18.96
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
Reference
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 7
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
Reference
5750906
resale - liquor
2,336.63
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
5750907
resale - wine
625.25
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
5750907
freight
18.72
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
628270
resale - liquor credit inv. #5718525
-7.81
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
629657
resale - liquor credit inv. #5737410
-224.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
629657
freight credit inv. #5737410
-1.44
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
629934
freight credit inv. # 5741290
-1.44
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
629934
resale liquor credit inv. # 5741290
-98.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
630685
resale - beer credit inv. #5742577
-24.60
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
Check Total:
24,117.73
Vendor: 4722
LILIA LANTTO
Check Sequence: 39
ACH Enabled: True
6/8/2017
Mileage Reimb - Life Guard Training in Becker
28.25
06/27/2017
226-45122-433100
Check Total:
28.25
Vendor: 4717
EUGENE LARKIN
Check Sequence: 40
ACH Enabled: False
Rvrfst 2017 -1
July 15 Riverfest appearance
1,250.00
06/27/2017
609-49754-425550
Check Total:
1,250.00
Vendor: 2304
LEGACY MECHANICAL SERVICES LLC
Check Sequence: 41
ACH Enabled: True
154
Test RPZ in Boiler Room & Pool Room
450.00
06/27/2017
226-45126-431990
Check Total:
450.00
Vendor: 4718
SCOTT LEIUS
Check Sequence: 42
ACH Enabled: False
Rvrfst 2017
July 15 Riverfest appearance
1,250.00
06/27/2017
609-49754-425550
Check Total:
1,250.00
Vendor: 3550
RACHEL LEONARD
Check Sequence: 43
ACH Enabled: True
6/8/2017
Mileage to Annual REP/DEOC/P10 Training - S
51.90
06/27/2017
101-41310-433100
Check Total:
51.90
Vendor: 4456
LUPULIN BREWING LLC
Check Sequence: 44
ACH Enabled: False
1638
resale - beer
346.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
1707
resale - beer
540.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425200
Check Total:
886.50
Vendor: 1300
DOUGLAS WILLIAM LYSENG
Check Sequence: 45
ACH Enabled: True
1361
Renewals: Antivirus Software (101 licenses), So
3,391.88
06/27/2017
702-00000-424100
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM)
Page 8
Invoice No Description
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
3,391.88
Reference
Check Total:
Vendor:
3896
M & M CARPET & UPHOLSTERY CLEANIN
1326
06/27/2017
Office Furniture Cleaning
Check Total:
Vendor:
1303
M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP
239378
resale - cigarettes; juice
239378
resale - tobacco; can coolers; cups; etc
ACH
Enabled:
Check Total:
Vendor:
2819
MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP
May 2017
Labor Relations Services - May 2017
299.37
06/27/2017
Check Total:
Vendor:
4721
MAMAC SYSTEMS
442142
Duct Temperature Sensor (2)
Check Total:
Vendor:
3745
MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY
20315417
Enabled:
(685) gal 1 gas @$2.30
20315419
06/27/2017
(927) gal diesel gas @$2.03
20330525
(623) gal 1 gas @$1.84
424888
(915) gal 1 gas @$1.94
Check Total:
Vendor:
1308
MARCOINC
332952423
Enabled:
6/10/17 - 7/10/17 Contract Payment
40.75
06/27/2017
Check Total:
Vendor:
1914
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS
20501741
(24.01) TN Rip Rap - Storm Water Mntc.
Check Total:
Vendor:
1314
MCDOWALL COMPANY
234978
Enabled:
Annual HVAC Maint Agreement Contract #C05 -
234979
06/27/2017
Annual HVAC Maint Agreement Contract #C05 -
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
3,391.88
Reference
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 9
Check Sequence: 46
ACH
Enabled:
False
272.00
06/27/2017
101-41310-431990
272.00
Check Sequence: 47
ACH
Enabled:
True
998.38
06/27/2017
609-49750-425500
299.37
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
1,297.75
Check Sequence: 48
ACH
Enabled:
False
71.50
06/27/2017
101-41800-430400
71.50
Check Sequence: 49
ACH
Enabled:
False
40.75
06/27/2017
226-45126-440440
40.75
Check Sequence: 50
ACH
Enabled:
True
1,575.17
06/27/2017
101-43120-421200
1,879.53
06/27/2017
101-43120-421200
1,148.27
06/27/2017
101-43120-421200
1,772.94
06/27/2017
101-43120-421200
6,375.91
Check Sequence: 51
ACH
Enabled:
True
2,736.72
06/27/2017
702-00000-441500
2,736.72
Check Sequence: 52
ACH
Enabled:
False
597.85
06/27/2017
101-43130-421990
597.85
Check Sequence: 53
ACH
Enabled:
False
332.00
06/27/2017
101-45501-431900
170.00
06/27/2017
101-41941-431900
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 9
Invoice No Description
234980 Annual HVAC Maint Agreement Contract #C05.'
Amount
Check Total:
Vendor: 2512
MONTICELLO PLBG HTG AC LLC
16837
(400) lb solar salt @ .175/lb.
16863
Replaced Condensor, Filter; Test Refrigerant
226-45126-431900
Check Total:
Vendor: 1373
MONTICELLO SCHOOL DISTRICT #882
6/8/2017
Refund: Overcharge for Water Access
6/8/2017
Refund: Under Charge for Water Meter
6/8/2017
Refund: Under Charge for Water Meter Tax
6/8/2017
Refund: Under Charge for Shipping on Water M
Check Total:
Vendor: 1377
MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER
June 2017
Monthly Allocation - June 2017
70.00
Check Total:
Vendor: 1379
MONTICELLO UMPIRE ASSOCIATION
MCC Softball
Umpire Monday & Tuesday Softball Leagues -
Check Total:
Vendor: 1390
MTI DISTRIBUTING INC
1121282
Shaft PTO; shaft pivot; (2) bearing; (4) bushing -
1121706
Repl. Brom; set (38) Spring Tine replacement
2,004.50
Check Total:
Vendor: 4390
MICHAEL MUELLER
6/20/2017
Referee Mens Hockey - 5/14 Game
Check Total:
Vendor: 2518
NEOFUNDS BYNEOPOST
06/03/2017
Postage
06/03/2017
Postage Purchased 5/22/17
06/03/2017
Postage for Pkgs to Dept Public Safety - May 20
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
Reference
466.00
06/27/2017
226-45126-431900
968.00
Check Sequence: 54
ACH
Enabled:
False
70.00
06/27/2017
101-42200-421990
1,934.50
06/27/2017
226-45126-431990
2,004.50
Check Sequence: 55
ACH
Enabled:
False
2,781.00
06/27/2017
265-43190-341100
-1,458.24
06/27/2017
265-43190-341100
-100.25
06/27/2017
601-00000-208100
-40.00
06/27/2017
601-00000-362900
1,182.51
Check Sequence: 56
ACH
Enabled:
True
4,880.00
06/27/2017
101-45175-444310
4,880.00
Check Sequence: 57
ACH
Enabled:
True
1,904.00
06/27/2017
226-45127-431990
1,904.00
Check Sequence: 58
ACH
Enabled:
False
711.36
06/27/2017
101-45201-422100
391.81
06/27/2017
101-45201-422100
1,103.17
Check Sequence: 59
ACH
Enabled:
False
40.00
06/27/2017
226-45127-431990
40.00
Check Sequence: 60
ACH
Enabled:
False
39.00
06/27/2017
101-41310-443990
1,000.00
06/27/2017
101-00000-155010
164.07
06/27/2017
217-41990-432200
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 10
Invoice No Description
Check Total:
Vendor: 4368 OFFICE DEPOT INC
933659848001 (2) 250pkpaper
933659924001 Post -it notes
933659924002 Post -it notes- backorder received
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
1,203.07
Check Total:
Vendor:
1411
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC
18210
06/27/2017
400W Lamps (4)
10.44
06/27/2017
Check Total:
Vendor:
1412
OMANN BROTHERS INC
12709
(10.03) SPWEA240A
Check Total:
Vendor:
1951
PAPCOINC
103496
Repair Auto Scrubber - Battery Cable, Cable Enc
Check Total:
Vendor:
1273
PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO
8592812
resale - wine
8592812
freight
233.06
06/27/2017
Check Total:
Vendor:
1427
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO
2178136
freight
2178136
06/27/2017
resale - liquor
2178137
06/27/2017
resale - wine
2178137
freight
2180009
resale - liquor
2180009
06/27/2017
freight
2180894
06/27/2017
freight
2180894
06/27/2017
resale - liquor
2180895
06/27/2017
resale - wine
2180895
06/27/2017
resale - mix
2180895
06/27/2017
freight
2181869
06/27/2017
freight
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
1,203.07
Check Sequence: 61
30.38
06/27/2017
101-43110-421990
10.44
06/27/2017
101-43110-421990
10.44
06/27/2017
101-43110-421990
51.26
Check Sequence: 62
97.76
06/27/2017
226-45126-421990
97.76
Check Sequence: 63
469.00
06/27/2017
101-43120-422400
469.00
Check Sequence: 64
233.06
06/27/2017
226-45126-431990
233.06
Check Sequence: 65
713.74
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
10.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
724.24
Check Sequence: 66
12.96
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
910.10
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
1,123.40
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
31.68
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
1,033.09
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
10.22
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
17.31
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
1,970.45
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
1,157.33
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
64.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
35.28
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
10.08
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
Reference
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 11
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
Reference
2181869
resale - wine
307.35
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
2181869
resale - liquor
34.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
2183715
freight
28.92
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
2183715
resale - liquor
2,156.78
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
266606
resale - mix credit inv #2178137
-58.80
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
266606
freight credit inv # 2178137
-1.44
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
Check Total:
8,843.21
Vendor:
4022
REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC
Check Sequence: 67
ACH Enabled: False
808465
Food for Concession Resale
463.43
06/27/2017
226-45125-425410
808465
Freight
7.99
06/27/2017
226-45122-433300
Check Total:
471.42
Vendor:
1474
PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL
Check Sequence: 68
ACH Enabled: True
June 2nd
Semi Monthly Contract Payment
1,593.75
06/27/2017
101-42700-431200
Check Total:
1,593.75
Vendor:
4716
SAVE A LIFE CORPORATION
Check Sequence: 69
ACH Enabled: True
4419
First Responder Crs- M. Coopman
595.00
06/27/2017
101-42200-433100
Check Total:
595.00
Vendor:
4719
SCHMITZ EXCAVATING
Check Sequence: 70
ACH Enabled: False
1276
312 Excavator remove roof -charged to ins. of he
500.00
06/27/2017
101-42200-431990
Check Total:
500.00
Vendor:
4627
SCOTT COUNTY
Check Sequence: 71
ACH Enabled: False
IN20109
2017 MN Public Broadband Alliance Membersh
1,500.00
06/27/2017
656-49870-431990
Check Total:
1,500.00
Vendor:
2443
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC
Check Sequence: 72
ACH Enabled: False
W5679437
6/3/17 - Wedding Security
140.00
06/27/2017
226-45123-431992
Check Total:
140.00
Vendor:
1490
CYNTHIA R SIMPSON
Check Sequence: 73
ACH Enabled: False
965208
June 2017 Cleaning - Fire Hall
100.00
06/27/2017
101-42200-431990
Check Total: 100.00
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM)
Page 12
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
Reference
Vendor: 3309
SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS,
Check Sequence: 74
ACH Enabled: False
1553031
resale - liquor
1,708.63
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
1553031
freight
18.55
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
1553032
freight
10.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
1553032
resale- wine
691.56
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
1555865
resale - wine
400.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
1555865
freight
14.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
1555866
freight
21.70
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
1555866
resale - liquor
2,250.90
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
1555867
resale - wine
882.58
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
1555867
freight
15.40
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
Check Total:
6,013.82
Vendor: 4672
SPECIALTY SOLUTIONS LLC
Check Sequence: 75
ACH Enabled: False
146760
(80) 50 lb. Fertilizer BCOL
1,396.00
06/27/2017
101-45201-421650
Check Total:
1,396.00
Vendor: 3594
STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT, LLC
Check Sequence: 76
ACH Enabled: False
2885452
asst. bags; cs. coffee
274.76
06/27/2017
609-49754-421990
Check Total:
274.76
Vendor: 1518
TDS TELECOM
Check Sequence: 77
ACH Enabled: True
763-271-3257
TDS
90.66
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
763-295-2005
TDS
18.09
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
763-295-3714
TDS
330.52
06/27/2017
702-00000-432100
Check Total:
439.27
Vendor: 1519
THEIN WELL CO
Check Sequence: 78
ACH Enabled: False
8695
Sealed (7) monitor wells on old WWTP sludge s
1,800.00
06/27/2017
602-49490-431990
Check Total:
1,800.00
Vendor: 1537
UHL COMPANY INC
Check Sequence: 79
ACH Enabled: True
51815
Control System Service Call WO #B70524009
318.00
06/27/2017
226-45126-431990
Check Total:
318.00
Vendor: 1544
US POSTAL SERVICE
Check Sequence: 80
ACH Enabled: False
6/9/2017
PI 42 - UB May Billing (3,773 pcs) (1/2)
854.59
06/27/2017
601-49440-432200
6/9/2017
PI 42 - UB May Billing (3,773 pcs) (1/2)
854.58
06/27/2017
602-49490-432200
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 13
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
Reference
Check Total:
1,709.17
Vendor:
4715
UTILITY CONSULTANTS, INC.
Check Sequence: 81
ACH Enabled: False
95066
(20) Phosphorus - Sample date: 5/10/17
100.00
06/27/2017
601-49440-422740
Check Total:
100.00
Vendor:
1552
VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
Check Sequence: 82
ACH Enabled: True
1963160
resale - soda pop
370.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-425400
Check Total:
370.50
Vendor:
1684
VINOCOPIA
Check Sequence: 83
ACH Enabled: True
0182419
resale - wine
80.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
0182419
freight
2.50
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
0182425
freight
10.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
0182425
resale- liquor
360.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
Check Total:
452.50
Vendor:
1561
WATER LABORATORIES INC
Check Sequence: 84
ACH Enabled: False
6221
May 2017 Water Testing
240.00
06/27/2017
601-49440-422740
Check Total:
240.00
Vendor:
1567
WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC
Check Sequence: 85
ACH Enabled: False
8280
ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Parts- (4) breaker; (12) coni
183.41
06/27/2017
229-45202-453010
8280
ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Labor- Engzd Panel; remv c
456.00
06/27/2017
229-45202-453010
Check Total:
639.41
Vendor:
1572
THE WINE COMPANY
Check Sequence: 86
ACH Enabled: True
39559
resale - wine
488.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
39559
frieght
8.25
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
Check Total:
496.25
Vendor:
1573
WINE MERCHANTS INC
Check Sequence: 87
ACH Enabled: False
7134368
resale - wine
1,720.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
7134368
freight
23.76
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
7137213
resale - wine
285.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425300
7137213
freight
4.32
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 14
Invoice No Description
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
2,033.08
Check Total:
Vendor: 1206
WINEBOW INC.
MN00022384
resale - liquor
MN00022384
freight
Vendor: 1581
Check Total:
Vendor: 2645
WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS
1
Re Issue - 2017 Asssessment Fees
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
2,033.08
Check Total:
Vendor: 1577
WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH
6/13/2017
Court Fines & Fees for May 2017
01494-700 45
Check Total:
Vendor: 1581
WRIGHT CO RECORDER
201700000047
Approval #A 1344009
201700000047
201706 -Amendment Misc #A 1344010
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
2,033.08
Check Total:
Vendor: 1584
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC
01160-38158
Standard Specification & Design Guidelines - A
01494-700 45
General W WTP - April 2017
01494-780 24
MS4/SWPPP Services - April 2017
01494-800 40
100009 - CSAH 75/TH 25 Intersection Improvei
01494-950 32
14C002 - Phosphorus Construction Phase 4 - Al
01627-680 15
16D002 - Mills Fleet Faun Plan Review - April
02596-010 28
2017 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - Al
02596-010 28
2017 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - Al
02596-010 28
2017 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - Al
02596-020 11
State Aid Network - April 2017
02596-030 19
Maps -April 2017
02596-100 23
15C001 - 2016 Street Reconstruction Project - A
02596-160 16
15C004 - 7th Street/TH25 Intersection Improve 1
02596-2208
201710 - Monti Middle School Expansion Phase
02596-2904
Monticello Business Center Drainage Study - A
02596-3202
Rolling Woods Park Sidewalk Extension - April
02596-3304
16D004 - Wamert/Sherburne Bank Plan Review
02596-3407
2016 - 2017 Market Matching - April 2017
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
2,033.08
Check Sequence: 88
204.00
06/27/2017
609-49750-425100
2.25
06/27/2017
609-49750-433300
206.25
Check Sequence: 89
1,144.20
06/13/2017
101-41550-431250
1,144.20
Check Sequence: 90
2,036.91
06/27/2017
101-42100-430410
2,036.91
Check Sequence: 91
46.00
06/27/2017
101-41910-431990
46.00
06/27/2017
101-41910-431990
92.00
Check Sequence: 92
452.00
06/27/2017
101-43111-430300
2,307.00
06/27/2017
602-49480-430300
192.00
06/27/2017
101-43111-430300
1,872.00
06/27/2017
400-43300-430300
3,991.75
06/27/2017
602-00000-165010
330.00
06/27/2017
101-00000-220110
2,660.00
06/27/2017
101-43111-430300
2,660.00
06/27/2017
601-49440-430300
2,660.00
06/27/2017
602-49490-430300
163.50
06/27/2017
101-43111-430300
814.00
06/27/2017
101-43111-430300
5,994.50
06/27/2017
400-43300-459011
39,533.75
06/27/2017
400-43300-459014
76.00
06/27/2017
101-00000-220110
4,156.50
06/27/2017
263-49200-431990
1,152.50
06/27/2017
229-45202-453910
1,207.00
06/27/2017
101-00000-220110
2,608.00
06/27/2017
213-46301-431990
Reference
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: True
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: True
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 15
Invoice No Description
02596-3505
17D001 - Camping World Plan Review - April,
02596-3607
16CO03 - 2017 Street Improvements - April 201
02596-4004
16CO06 - Fallon Ave Improvements - April 201'
02596-4202
201710 - Spaeth Plan Review - April 2017
47,169.50
Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
407.00
06/27/2017
101-00000-220110
41,877.75
06/27/2017
400-43300-459016
47,169.50
06/27/2017
400-43300-459018
76.00
06/27/2017
101-00000-220110
162,360.75
423,723.39
92
The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment.
Date: 6/26/17 Approved by:
Mayor Brian Stumpf
Reference
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 16
City Council Agenda 6/26/17
2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred
recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the
hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By
ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to
terminated and otherwise departing employees.
Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget)
A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training
involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as
needed, until replaced.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached
list.
2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff
recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as
listed.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
• List of new/terminated employees
NEW EMPLOYEES
Name
Title
Department
Hire Date
Class
Kirsten Olson
Guest Service
MCC
6/12/2017
PT
Nicholas Lostetter
Climbing Wall
MCC
6/12/2017
PT
Nathan Hoglund
Parks Worker
Parks
6/12/2017
Seasonal
Charlie Voller
Parks Worker
Parks
6/22/2017
Seasonal
TERMINATING EMPLOYEES
Name Reason Department Last Day Class
Danielle Kinler Involuntary MCC 6/19/17 PT
Marina Livarchuk Involuntary MCC 6/19/17 PT
New Hire and Terms City Council 2017: 6/21/2017
City Council Agenda 06/26/2017
2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property (WO)
There is no report this City Council cycle.
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
2D. Consideration of shifting to paperless agendas beginning the first Citv Council
meeting in Julv 2017 (JS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
On Feb 13, 2017, City Council directed staff to research the City Council shifting to
paperless agenda packets. After some research, staff agreed that the Microsoft Surface
Pros would be the designated device for use. Five Surface Pros were purchase for City
Council and one for City Staff. This device will be a take-home device.
The Surface Pros allow for a pdf version of the Council agenda to be downloaded onto
the device for Councilmembers to read, make notations, and organize packet information.
The proposed model includes Wi-Fi networking, which allows connection to the Internet
and checking e-mail if you have a wireless router at home or are otherwise using the
device near a wireless hotspot.
Staff is proposing to cease the printing of agenda packets for City Council members
beginning July 10.
Al. Budget Impact: The cost of the devices, covers, & pens totaled approximately
$5,422.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: There was some staff time in researching and reviewing
the devices.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the transition to a paperless agenda beginning at the City
Council meeting on July 10, 2017.
2. Motion to deny.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends Alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
• None.
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
2E. Consideration of approving an application for temporary on -sale liquor license for
the Monticello Lions Club for their Brewfest event on August 19, 2017 (JS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Monticello Lions Club is requesting approval of an application for a 1 -day temporary
on -sale liquor license on August 19, 2017 for their annual Brewfest event. The Lions
Club will be setting up the event in West Bridge Park, located at 107 West River Street.
The Lions Club has provided a certificate of insurance for this event and will be
submitting an application for a special event permit for use of West Bridge Park in the
coming months.
City Council is required to approve temporary liquor applications prior to sending them
to the State Alcohol and Gambling Division for approval.
Al. Budget Impact: None
A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time to send application to State Alcohol
and Gambling Division for approval.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the application for a temporary liquor license for the
Monticello Lions Brewfest event on August 19, 2017 at West Bridge Park.
2. Do not approve the application for a temporary liquor license.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends Alternative #1 for approval of the application.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Application for temporary liquor license
B. Certificate of Liability Insurance
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
o � I
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555
APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY
TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
Name of organization
44 im
Address
-i)G �bx ti
Name of person making application
V�\ICkd) )� Cy/'
Date(s) of event
Icy, c.s� r 9, eW 7
Organization officer's name �l p
(k�oX/
Organization officer's name
I
Organization officer's name
I
Organization officer's name
I
Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe.
Es.rl�iye ,
/07 wpm�'�P� f�PP7`, �'L�6JjCe
If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service.
If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage.
APPROVAL
APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
City or County approving the license
Fee Amount
P/ -70/7
Date Fee Paid
Date Approved
Permit Date
City or County E-mail Address
City or County Phone Number
Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event.
ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY.
PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT
BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATION@STATE.MN.US
Date organized
OAS q V1 197
Tax exempt number
I I Q- K02
City
State
Zip Code
�/ f
.N Y-i'C_r IMN
11-
Business phone
Home phone
-
-�I 61z , --? 6�����
II�rz 6�a7�7
Type of organization
E] Club
❑ Charitable ❑ Religious Other non-profit
State
Zip Code
`City
IMN
c,
I I
City J
State
Zip Code
I
I IMN
I
State
Zip Code
( {City
J I
I IMN
I
City
State
Zip Code
1 1
I IMN
I I
Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe.
Es.rl�iye ,
/07 wpm�'�P� f�PP7`, �'L�6JjCe
If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service.
If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage.
APPROVAL
APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
City or County approving the license
Fee Amount
P/ -70/7
Date Fee Paid
Date Approved
Permit Date
City or County E-mail Address
City or County Phone Number
Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event.
ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY.
PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT
BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATION@STATE.MN.US
1 a I DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
A`� o CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 6/7/2017
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to
the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the
certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
CONTACT
PRODUCER NAME: Lucas Olson
Christensen Group Insurance I FAX (952)653-1100
PHONE (952) 653-1000
IANC. No. Extl: IA/C, No):
11100 Bren Road West E-MAIL ADDRESS: lolson@christensengroup.com
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
Minnetonka MN 55343 INSURERA:West Bend Mutual 15350
INSURED I INSURER B:
Monticello Lions Club I INSURERC:
PO BOX 673 I INSURER D:
INSURER E:
Monticello MN 55362 I INSURER F:
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:17-18 Liab REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR'ADDLSUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP I LIMITS
ITR TYPE OF INSURANCE (MSD WVn POLICY NUMBER IMM/DD/YYYYI IMM/DD/YYYYI
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
A CLAIMS -MADE ❑X OCCUR
A107246
GENT AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
POLICY ❑ PRO ❑ LOC
X PRO-
JECT
OTHER:
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
_ ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED SCHEDULED
_ AUTOS AUTOS
NON -OWNED
HIRED AUTOS H
AUTOS
UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR
EXCESS LIAB HCLAIMS-MADE
DED I I RETENTION $
WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE ❑ N / A
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
A LIQUOR LIABILITY I A107247
EACH OCCURRENCE
DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence)
1/1/2017 1/1/2018 I MED EXP (Any one person)
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
IGENERAL AGGREGATE
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$ 1,000,000
$ 100,000
$ EXCLUDED
$ 1,000,000
$ 2,000,000
$ 2,000,000
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $
(Ea accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person) $
BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
(Per accident)
$
EACH OCCURRENCE $
(AGGREGATE $
$
PER
STATUTE I IEERH
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $
1/1/2017 1/1/2018 EACH COMMON CAUSE
AGGREGATE
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)
RE: Monticello Lions Brewfest - West Bridge Park
Certificate Holder is included as an Additional Insured under the Commercial General Liability and Liquor
Liability when required by written contract.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
City of Monticello THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
505 Walnut St
Monticello, MN 55362
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Bruce Christensen/LMO
©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
INS025 (201401)
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
2F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing exclusive use of West
Bridge Park and related assistance in conjunction with the Brewfest event on
August 19, 2017. Applicant: Monticello Lions Club (JS/PW)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City Council is asked to consider approval of a special event permit for the Brewfest
event, a craft beer -tasting fundraiser organized by the Monticello Lions Club. The request
has several associated considerations:
a) Approval for use of West Bridge Park from 7 a.m. — 10 p.m. (to
accommodate set-up and tear -down)
b) Approval of the use of city parking lots in the downtown area
C) Approval for city staff assistance for preparation and set-up
d) Closure of portions of W. River Street and Walnut Street
This adult-oriented community event is proposed to occur Saturday, August 19, 2017,
from 3 to 7 p.m., and is being promoted and held in cooperation with eligible Minnesota
craft brew vendors and local food vendors. Brewfest organizers are expecting 120 brew
types at 45 tables, as well as local restaurant vendors, and an attendance of 1500 persons.
Brewfest representatives have indicated that the set-up for the park will be very similar to
last year's event. As a condition of approval, the Brewfest Committee will be asked to
coordinate with the Parks Superintendent and Streets Superintendent on site planning and
parking coordination. City staff will begin advertising closing of the park two weeks in
advance of the event.
The event is proposed to be located in West Bridge Park. Event attendees would access
the park from different locations nearby, with restricted points of entry into the event area
in the park itself. The Brewfest Committee indicates in the attached application narrative
that the event area within the park will be sectioned off with temporary fencing in order
to restrict the point of entry to those over 21 years of age, as this event will be limited to
only those persons over 21 holding an event ticket. The Lions Club will be responsible
for placement of fencing around the park perimeter and for signage at the parking lots,
with snow fence and posts provided by the City as is available.
The Brewfest event will include a band for background listening. It is not anticipated that
this would create any concerns about sound or volume. However, the Lions Club is being
asked to provide advance notice of the event to surrounding homes and businesses within
a 2 -block radius.
The Brewfest Committee is seeking City assistance for providing barricades, cones,
picnic tables, and set-up of those items. The Committee will be asked to verify trash and
portable restroom services for the event. The Committee has requested use of the park
from 7 a.m.— 10 p.m. to accommodate set-up, clean-up and tear -down by Lions Club
members.
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
As with the 2016 event, Public Works staff has proposed a plan to block off some streets
in the area of West Bridge Park in order to control traffic flow into and out of the park
vicinity. Any approval is contingent on coordination with the Streets Department and
Wright County Sherriff's Office for final security, traffic control and street closures. A
map of the proposed closures and site plan has been prepared by the Street
Superintendent and is attached for reference.
The Sheriff's Office has reviewed the permit application and has indicated no issues with
the proposed permit; the Sheriff's Office noted that the event organizers have in the past
hired an off-duty deputy to assist with security.
The Monticello Lions Club is required to obtain insurance to cover the event and its
activities, including liquor liability coverage, with the City named as second insured. The
Lions Club is responsible for verifying that individual food and beverage vendors have
the appropriate insurance coverage and state permits. The Lions Club is expected to
provide security for the event through the Wright County Sheriff's Department.
Al. Budget Impact: None.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: The Lions Club is requesting City assistance for
delivery and pick-up of barricades, cones, and picnic tables. These will be
delivered to the site and picked up during regular staff hours by the Parks
Department (estimated 16 hours). The Street Superintendent will also prepare and
provide a site plan for barricade and cone placement. The Streets Department will
be responsible for placing and removing all street barricades and signage
(estimated 12 hours).
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit allowing temporary use of West
Bridge Park for the Monticello Lions Brewfest event from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. on
Saturday, August 19, 2017, including City assistance, use of municipal parking
lots, and street closures. The approval is contingent on:
a. Continued site plan and parking use coordination with the Street
Superintendent and Park Superintendent.
b. Appropriate signage and fencing in coordination with the Street and Park
Superintendents.
C. Continued coordination with the Chief Building Official on any tent
permits that may be needed.
d. Verification of trash and portable bathroom services for the event.
e. Verification of notification of affected local businesses and residents
within a 2 -block radius of the Park by permit holder, no later than two
weeks prior to event.
f. Event coordination with Wright County Sheriff's Office.
2
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
2. Motion to deny Special Event Permit for Brewfest event on August 19, 2017.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff supports Alternative #1 above.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Application & Narrative — Lions Club
B. Certificate of Liability Insurance
C. Aerial Image showing proposed street and parking lot closures
CITY Ur
Monticello
Property Address
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Community Development
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
(763) 295-2711 . info(i ,ci.monticello.mn.us
Property Legal Description
Property ID Number
Owner Name
Owner Address
Owner Phone
Owner Email
PROPERTY INFORMATION
PROPERTY QWW$ INFORMATION
.sos- u,,A: I &- a rWe t-
APPUCANT INFORMATION
Special Event Permit
Application Checklist
Applicant Name 04 �f� 0416 i 44
Applicant Address Q ph'
Applicant Phone I A,- /0 �,/� /Z 3(tp 0717
Applicant Email 141 / C 1(r le— a , aoAi.\
Name of Event 9,00(1 / Cp to k116 S AIIPW 'fps 2el7
Location/Address of Event I /,{i S rlc�RP N % C(//�S IQrvQr .I�eell
Dates & Times of Event -5) 0L � #9 j� ��, 7 p /7 7 AA4 � /d A^
y
Complete Application Required
The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all
items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office.
Application Submission Schedule
Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to
desired approval date.
Application Information
Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits
and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit
application and approval.
Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including
rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and
approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and
approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the
application regarding these requests.
07/25/16
APPUCANT APPUCATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CITY CHECK-IN
CHECK
A written narrative including:
1. A description of the proposed special event, how it will function
on the property, hours and dates of operation, and any other
information necessary to fully describe the request; and
2. An explanation of how the proposed special event will meet,
each of the review criteria specified by code (on reverse), as well
as any additional criteria that may apply for the specific use.
3. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City
equipment and City property (including rights of way) and/or any
requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires
review and approval by the City Council
A site plan showing all information necessary to accurately depict how
the proposed use will function on the site. Information required on the
site plan shall include but not be limited to:
1. The location of all existing and proposed structures;
2. Driveways and parking areas;
3. Proposed storage spaces;
4. Natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, shorelines, etc;
5. Proposed number of parking spaces (if applicable).
If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a
survey may be required to be submitted with the application in
addition to a site plan.
Certificate of insurance/liability coverage.
Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above.
Application fee of $50.00.
Special Event Review Process
• The City Clerk will review all Temporary Use Permit applications.
• Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Monticello Zoning Code
Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) and listed below shall be approved by the Community Development
Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be
provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments.
• Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) shall be
denied by the Community Development Department.
• A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial.
Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria
Approval of a Temporary Use Permit shall only be granted once the City Clerk has determined the use shall:
• Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health,
safety, or general welfare;
• Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site;
• Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods;
07/25/16
Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria, cont.
• Not include permanent alterations to the site;
• Not maintain temporary signs associated with the use or structure after the activity ends;
• Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the site;
• Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property; and
• Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event to occur, as well
as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic movement associated with the
temporary use, without disturbing environmentally sensitive lands.
• Not create an unreasonable risk of significant:
1. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear;
2. Injury to persons;
3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances;
4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or pedestrian travel;
5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash removal, maintenance,
or other public services demands; and
6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare.
The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the particular location
requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event.
The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at the same location in a
manner that will negatively impact the public health, welfare, or safety.
Special Event Temporary Use Permit Conditions of Approval
In approving the Temporary Use Permit for the special event, the City Clerk's Office is authorized to
impose such conditions upon the issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize
any potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the condition relates to a
situation created or aggravated by the proposed special event. The Community Development
Department is authorized, where appropriate, to require:
1. Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and egress.
2. Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of glare or direct
illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and
heat.
3. Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including placement, height
and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards.
4. Provision of sanitary and medical facilities.
5. Provision of solid waste collection and disposal.
6. Provision of security and safety measures.
7. Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event.
8. Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities.
9. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the special
event to a shorter time period than that requested or specified in this subsection.
10. Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary facilities or
structures used for such proposed special event will be removed from the site within a
reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former
condition.
Duration of Permit
A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this subsection shall be limited to
a maximum duration of 14 days per site per calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the
City Clerk.
07/25/16 3
Property Owners Statement I
I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance
with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted.
(Signature)
! ApplkaWs Statement
(Date)
This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the
application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read
and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this
application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct.
(Signature)/%/C%X/IF
j�
WY APPROVAL
(City Clerk Signature)
(Community Development Director Signature)
Special Event Permit
Approval is granted with the following conditions:
Internal review checklist (as applicable):
Public Works Routing
Law Enforcement Notification
Building Department
Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations
Post -Approval Routing/Requirements
Applicant
Public Works
Law Enforcement Notification
City Clerk
Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations
Liability Insurance Certificate Received
Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete
(Date) 7 7-" /�7
(Date)
(Date)
Approved ❑ I Denied ❑
Admin I Parks I Streets I Director
07/25/16 4
Monticello Lions — PO Box 673 — Monticello, MN 55362
b�0
�yIfRNAT10�a� We Serve
1 June 2017
Staff and Council
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Greetings,
As you are likely aware, the Monticello Lion's Club has a long tradition of serving the Monticello community, especially
the humanitarian needs of our less fortunate residents, and having fun as we serve. We raise money for programs in a
variety of ways and are currently planning an event that we need your help with in order for us to be successful.
The event we are planning is the 2017 Monticello Lions Brewfest, a "Craft Beer Tasting Festival". We are expecting 120
plus beer "flavors" from craft brewers to be presented for tasting. We are planning to make it a celebration of not only
craft beer from small brewers, but also a festival of music and food from local restaurants. Our participation goal for
the2017 Brewfest is 1500 attendees. The date of the festival is August 19, 2017.
Consider the mission statement for this event, "To establish and promote a signature craft beer tasting event for the
purpose of raising revenue, in order to continue and expand the community service tradition of the Monticello Lions by
using the funds raised for humanitarian purposes. The motto of the Monticello Lions and Lions everywhere being, "We
Serve".
We are hoping to build on the success of the previous years festivals. Our goals are to increase the number of beer
vendors, the number of beers to taste, the number of attendees, and the amount of net revenue, and to improve the
experience for all in attendance. Judging by the response of all of the stakeholders including brewers, distributors, food
vendors, attendees and the Lions, we are well on our way to achieving this goal. Last year the Lions were able to give
more than $30,000.00 back to the community as a direct result of the Brewfest festival. Just a few of the beneficiaries of
these funds include the Monticello Food Shelf, the Monticello Fire Department, 320 families and individuals that
received food baskets last Christmas, and many other programs that serve the community, especially the less fortunate
among us.
The actual use of West Bridge Park will be to set up to 45 tables, some or all with small pop-up tents over them, for Craft
Beer Brewers to display their craft beers for sampling. Festival attendees will be given a two ounce sampling glass to use
to sample as many of the craft beers present as they wish to.
In addition to the craft beer brewers there will be up to six local restaurants with tables and small tents selling their
culinary specialties. We have also retained a band with a comfortable bluesy rock flavor to provide a pleasant musical
background for the event. The event will take place rain or shine. We have had great days, weather wise, for the last
five year's events, and are hoping for another just like it this year.
The tasting hours for this event will be from 3 — 7 PM. By Minnesota statute, a tasting festival can only run for four
hours. We are requesting reservation of the park from 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM to accommodate set-up and tear -down /
clean-up. At the end of the event Lions members will take down, pack up and remove all materials, structures, trash,
etc. from the site.
To accomplish the goal of a successful, orderly and peaceful event, we request that the park be closed to all other uses
for that day. We intend to place a fence around the perimeter of the space that we will be using. All Brewfest activities
will take place within the fence. All persons inside the fence must be 21, must have purchased a Brewfest ticket, and be
wearing a wristband that we will issue.
This narrative is attached to the permit application. We have had extensive contact with City of Monticello employees
that may be affected by this event, and communicated with them so as to set up in a manner that is acceptable to the
City of Monticello. Several City of Monticello employees are also members of the Monticello Lions Club.
Sincerely,
Mike Cyr
Monticello Lions Brewfest Committee
612.366.0717
SUB -TOTAL RENTAL FEE Renters Email Address
KEY/CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT • $200 $200'DEPOSIT WILL BEREFUNDED AFTER KEYISRETURNED AND/OR FACILITY HAS BEEN INSPECTED
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE PAID CASH I CREDIT CARD CHECK#
�1T l'� tY'.'all:'1'i'I'1 { la�'.,1'r �I • a1 i1 iA,.a 1'17t �1 x,41.1 11 yI.l 11��' , -1% ! a 4i N �L'-ni�I �_ IA j.a"1l1'a •yJ..N Jl\MoLmSi 1, KaiiW'..4s«
I (NAME: �orN 4 6, i C)I )
(ORGANIZATION: ��e.CuS� _ — NON-PROFIT ID:
JIADDRESS: _
JCITY: �r� �-(� �� t�� STATE: ZIP: PHONE:
(RESERVATION DATE REQUESTED. I L FROM: ANI/PIV TO: Apq/ph1
i
I HAVE RECEIVED, READ AND AGREE TO ABIDE BY ALL PARK ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS WELL AS ALL CONDITIONS
SET FORTH IN THIS PERMIT ANP IN THE PARK RESERVATION POLICY J
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: C� r /] , i L �^ l7 4'1s� V W DATE:
ISSUED BY: / I e6
n DATE: q I/T� / I 7
r
IKey 6 garbage bags Copy of reservation confirmation
SIGNED BY. DATE
Guest Services Associate Renter Signature
IKEY ISSUED: Y / N (KEY #: FACILITY INSPECTED BY.
IKEY RETURNED: Y/ N GATE: DEPOSIT CHECK RETURNED: Y / N I DATE:
PERMIT FAUST BE TURi IED ISI TO CIT`( HALL AT SOS INALNU f STREET, SUITE 1, mot iTICELLO, PAS I
CALL 753-297-2711 INITH QUESTIONS
RENTAL FEE INCLUDES NIN
STATE SALES
c�
g
TAX
elMn'¢
W PARKS
FAi3L1 f
NON
<�`\ 4 o`
iiii
y�'¢3_
RESIDENT RESIDENT ti�P¢ a"ym'¢'ro''y
L°`�¢tiDcti`$r�,= rte arca' as�a`' r�
i�IMENNITIaj
EAST BRIDGE PARK
GAZEBO
$100 $125 5.2o
O O O —
---RIVER
OVERLOOK
ELLISON PARK
GAZEBO
$100 $125 5.3
0 0 fl 0 0
'a a
HANDICAP PLAY AREAS
ELLISON PARK
LOG SHELTER
$100 $125 5.3
0 0
O 0
HANDICAP PLAY AREAS
7C WEST BRIDGE PARK
(COMMUNITY ROOM
$100 $125 2.50_O
0 O 0 0 0 00 000
FISHING PIER, CANOE LAUNCH
X WEST BRIDGE PARK
(PICNIC SHELTER
$100 $125 2.50_0
CPO 00 O 0 0 O
O
_O
_I--
FISHING PIER, CANOE LAUNCH
PIONEER PARK
CONCESSION STAND
$100 $125 23.2
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
GROVELAND PARK
PICNIC SHELTER
$100 $125 4.20
0 0
0
OTTER CREEK PARK
GAZEBO
$50 $75 0.4
0 • 0 o m
0 CREEKOVERLOOK
SUB -TOTAL RENTAL FEE Renters Email Address
KEY/CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT • $200 $200'DEPOSIT WILL BEREFUNDED AFTER KEYISRETURNED AND/OR FACILITY HAS BEEN INSPECTED
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE PAID CASH I CREDIT CARD CHECK#
�1T l'� tY'.'all:'1'i'I'1 { la�'.,1'r �I • a1 i1 iA,.a 1'17t �1 x,41.1 11 yI.l 11��' , -1% ! a 4i N �L'-ni�I �_ IA j.a"1l1'a •yJ..N Jl\MoLmSi 1, KaiiW'..4s«
I (NAME: �orN 4 6, i C)I )
(ORGANIZATION: ��e.CuS� _ — NON-PROFIT ID:
JIADDRESS: _
JCITY: �r� �-(� �� t�� STATE: ZIP: PHONE:
(RESERVATION DATE REQUESTED. I L FROM: ANI/PIV TO: Apq/ph1
i
I HAVE RECEIVED, READ AND AGREE TO ABIDE BY ALL PARK ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS WELL AS ALL CONDITIONS
SET FORTH IN THIS PERMIT ANP IN THE PARK RESERVATION POLICY J
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: C� r /] , i L �^ l7 4'1s� V W DATE:
ISSUED BY: / I e6
n DATE: q I/T� / I 7
r
IKey 6 garbage bags Copy of reservation confirmation
SIGNED BY. DATE
Guest Services Associate Renter Signature
IKEY ISSUED: Y / N (KEY #: FACILITY INSPECTED BY.
IKEY RETURNED: Y/ N GATE: DEPOSIT CHECK RETURNED: Y / N I DATE:
PERMIT FAUST BE TURi IED ISI TO CIT`( HALL AT SOS INALNU f STREET, SUITE 1, mot iTICELLO, PAS I
CALL 753-297-2711 INITH QUESTIONS
AC"R" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY)
I 6/7/2017
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to
the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the
certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER I CONTACT
NAME: Lucas Olson
Christensen Group Insurance I HONE .ext/: (952) 653-1000 I AIC. No): (952) 653-1100
11100 Bren Road WestIADDRESS:lolson@christensengroup.com
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
Minnetonka MN 55343 I INSURER A :West Bend Mutual 15350
INSURED I INSURER B:
Monticello Lions Club IINSURER C:
PO Box 673
INSURER D
INSURER E:
Monticello MN 55362 INSURER F:
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:17-18 Liab REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR ADDL SUBR POLICY EFFPOLICY EXP
LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE wgn wvn POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYYI I (MM/DD/YYYYI I LIMITS
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
A -� CLAIMS -MADE X❑ OCCUR
A107246
GEML AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
POLICY PRO ❑ LOC
X JECT
OTHER:
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
ALL OWNEDSCHEDULED
AUTOS AUTOS
NON -OWNED
HIRED AUTOS AUTOS
UMBRELLA LIABHOLAIMS
CCUR
EXCESS LIAB C
-MADE
DED I I RETENTION $
WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? Ll N/A
(Mandatory in NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
A LIQUOR LIABILITY I A107247
1/1/2017 1/1/2018
EACH OCCURRENCE $
DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $
MED EXP (Any one person) I $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GENERAL AGGREGATE I$
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG I $
I$
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $
(Ea accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per per
$
BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
(Per accident)
EACH OCCURRENCE $
(AGGREGATE $
$
PER I STATUTE I IEERH
I E.L. EACH ACCIDENT Is
I E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYE $
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $
1/1/2017 1 1/1/2018 EACH COMMON CAUSE
AGGREGATE
1,000,000
100,000
EXCLUDED
1,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)
RE: Monticello Lions Brewfest - West Bridge Park
Certificate Holder is included as an Additional Insured under the Commercial General Liability and Liquor
Liability when required by written contract.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
City of Monticello THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
505 Walnut St ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
Monticello, MN 55362
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Bruce Christensen/LMO
©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
INS025 (201401)
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
2G. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at
Chatter's Bar & Grill on Julv 14 and 15, 2017. Applicant: Steffens,
Brooke/Chatters Restaurant (JS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City has received a Special Event permit application from Chatters Restaurant for
live entertainment activities after 10 p.m.
Special Event permits are also brought to the City Council if there is the potential that the
activity proposed could impact the City's regulations pertaining to noise.
The Special Event Ordinance allows the City Council to approve Special Event permits
for activity after 10 p.m.
3-19-2:
(D) Special events shall not operate before 7 a.m. or after 10 p.m. unless a Special Event
Permit (or other) for such activity has been approved by the City Council. Such permit
supersedes the provisions of City Code 6-1-10(B).
In this case, Chatter's Restaurant has applied for a Special Event permit for Friday
evening, July 14, 2017, and Saturday, July 15, 2017. Their outdoor events are proposed
to take place both evenings from 9:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. The applicant intends to have
live music Friday evening, and a DJ service on Saturday evening. As described by the
applicant in their site plan and narrative, it is their intent to have the activity occur in the
west area of their parking lot.
The Chatters property itself is located directly adjacent on its west property line to
Highway 25. The site is surrounded to the north, east and south by commercial property.
The property is located approximately 735 feet from the nearest residential property,
which is in the Groveland neighborhood. The Groveland neighborhood is separated from
the site by both commercial property and Highway 25.
The applicant's narrative indicates that the band would be oriented north inside the tent
for the event. By orienting the band to the north, the restaurant is intending to minimize
the potential the noise impacts to the residential area located to the west. The restaurant
is also proposing to enclose the band and activity area with a 30' x 60' tent. The area will
also be fenced.
The Wright County Sheriff's Office received a copy of the permit application for review.
In 2015 the Sheriff's Office did receive a call for response to a disturbance, but indicated
that there were no concerns regarding issuance of this year's permit.
Al. Budget Impact: None.
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time was necessary to review the request
and prepare this report. No additional staff time is anticipated for this request.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at
Chatter's Restaurant Bar & Grill for July 14 and 15, 2017, as described in the
application materials, including:
a. Exemption from the noise ordinance
b. Pending approval of Chief Building Official on tent permit.
2. Motion to deny the Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at Chatter's
Restaurant Bar & Grill, based on findings to be made by the City Council.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends Alternative #I above.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Application & Narrative
B. Certificate of Liability Coverage
C. Event Map
2
CITY �o r CITY OF MONTICELLO
i Community Development
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Special Event Permit
Monticeffo Monticello, MN 55362
(763) 295-2711 . info iki.monticello.mn.us Application Checklist
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Address Li491 l_ t -CJ +-. Ct - M tM (r j I P , h �-i 56V Z 1
Property Legal Description '
Property ID Number
Owner Name
Owner Address `�I!
Owner Phone
Owner Email
Applicant Name
Applicant Address ( (�dq,�''i -fi M001(IrA 10 M 0 �3U Z
Applicant Phone ;` )-I I ` D 6 h ) I✓�.I� °�l-k I XJ i0 (W 1)
Applicant Email ��I d � 1 AA- (b
Name of Event p b. "
Location/Address of Event 6J1 -
Dates & Times of Event�r,�'"k.pi-1AM4yz/�tVhwAAjjkAj+- h -
Complete Application Required
The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all
items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office.
Application Submission Schedule
Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to
desired approval date.
Application Information
Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits
and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit
application and approval.
Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including
rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and
approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and
approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the
application regarding these requests.
07/25/16
APPLICANT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTSI CITY CHECK-IN
CHECK
A written narrative including:
1. A description of the proposed special event, how it will function
on the property, hours and dates of operation, and any other
information necessary to fully describe the request; and
2. An explanation of how the proposed special event will meet
each of the review criteria specified by code (on reverse), as well
as any additional criteria that may apply for the specific use.
3. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City
equipment and City property (including rights of way) and/or any
requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires
review and approval by the City Council
A site plan showing all information necessary to accurately depict how
the proposed use will function on the site. Information required on the
site plan shall include but not be limited to:
1. The location of all existing and proposed structures;
2. Driveways and parking areas;
3. Proposed storage spaces;
4. Natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, shorelines, etc;
5. Proposed number of parking spaces (if applicable).
If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a
survey may be required to be submitted with the application in
addition to a site plan.
Certificate of insurance/liability coverage.
Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above.
Application fee of $50.00.
Special Event Review Process
• The City Clerk will review all Temporary Use Permit applications.
• Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Monticello Zoning Code
Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) and listed below shall be approved by the Community Development
Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be
provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments.
• Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) shall be
denied by the Community Development Department.
• A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial.
Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria
Approval of a Temporary Use Permit shall only be granted once the City Clerk has determined the use shall:
• Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health,
safety, or general welfare;
• Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site;
• Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods;
07/25/16 2
Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria, cont.
• Not include permanent alterations to the site;
• Not maintain temporary signs associated with the use or structure after the activity ends;
• Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the site;
• Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property; and
• Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event to occur, as well
as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic movement associated with the
temporary use, without disturbing environmentally sensitive lands.
• Not create an unreasonable risk of significant:
1. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear;
2. Injury to persons;
3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances;
4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or pedestrian travel;
5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash removal, maintenance,
or other public services demands; and
6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare.
The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the particular location
requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event.
The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at the same location in a
manner that will negatively impact the public health, welfare, or safety.
Special Event Temporary Use Permit Conditions of Approval
• In approving the Temporary Use Permit for the special event, the City Clerk's Office is authorized to
impose such conditions upon the issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize
any potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the condition relates to a
situation created or aggravated by the proposed special event. The Community Development
Department is authorized, where appropriate, to require:
1. Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and egress.
2. Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of glare or direct
illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and
heat.
3. Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including placement, height
and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards.
4. Provision of sanitary and medical facilities.
5. Provision of solid waste collection and disposal.
6. Provision of security and safety measures.
7. Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event.
8. Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities.
9. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the special
event to a shorter time period than that requested or specified in this subsection.
10. Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary facilities or
structures used for such proposed special event will be removed from the site within a
reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former
condition.
Duration of Permit
A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this subsection shall be limited to
a maximum duration of 14 days per site per calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the
City Clerk.
07/25/16
3
Property Owner's Statement
I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance
with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted.
(Sinatur) (Date)
Applicant's Statement
This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the
application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read
and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this
application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct.
(Signature) r �� (Date)
1
CITY APPROVAL
(City Clerk Signature) (Date)
(Community Development Director Signature) I (Date)
Special Event Permit I Approved ❑ I Denied ❑
Approval is granted with the following conditions:
Internal review checklist (as applicable):
Public Works Routing
Law Enforcement Notification
Building Department
Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations
Post -Approval Routing/Requirements
Applicant
Public Works
Law Enforcement Notification
City Clerk
Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations
Liability Insurance Certificate Received
Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete
Admin I Parks I Streets Director
07/25/16 4
Aii'DSOR" ® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCEI DATE(MM/DD/YYYY)
06/05/2017
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on
this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER CONTACT
Cheryl Johnson
NE Advantage 1 Insurance { /C No'
Ext,: 320-253-3525 FAX No,: 320 650-1361
3801 N 3rd Street, Suite 100 I t MAIL
ADDRESS: info@advantageoneins.com
eoneins.com
S
SAINT CLOUD, MN 56303 I INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE I NAIC#
INSURER F:
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 00000000-641678 REVISION NUMBER: 8
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
ILTR TYPE OF INSURANCE N� WVD i POLICY NUMBER (MML/DDY) IMMIDDEFF NYYYI XP i LIMITS
A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y '08093251 07/01/2017 07/01/20181 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
CLAIMS -MAGE OCCUR DAMAGE TO RENTED
I PREMISES (Ea occurrence) I $ 300,000
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
POLICY n JEPRO- n LOC
OTHER:
A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
OWNED SCHEDULED
AUTOS ONLYAUTOS
X HIRED AUTOS ONLY X AUTNOOS ONLY
A X UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR
EXCESS LIAB I—XI CLAIMS -MADE
DED I X I RETENTION $ 10,000
B WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ N / A
(Mandatory in NH)
It yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
A Liquor Liability
INSURERA: Auto Owners Insurance Co.
INSURED WEST RIVER RESTAURANTS INC
INSURERB: Ram Mutual Insurance
DBA CHATTERS RESTAURANT & BAR
INSURER C:
4089 CEDAR ST
INSURERD:
MONTICELLO, MN 55362,4524
I INSURERE:
INSURER F:
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 00000000-641678 REVISION NUMBER: 8
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
ILTR TYPE OF INSURANCE N� WVD i POLICY NUMBER (MML/DDY) IMMIDDEFF NYYYI XP i LIMITS
A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y '08093251 07/01/2017 07/01/20181 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
CLAIMS -MAGE OCCUR DAMAGE TO RENTED
I PREMISES (Ea occurrence) I $ 300,000
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
POLICY n JEPRO- n LOC
OTHER:
A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
OWNED SCHEDULED
AUTOS ONLYAUTOS
X HIRED AUTOS ONLY X AUTNOOS ONLY
A X UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR
EXCESS LIAB I—XI CLAIMS -MADE
DED I X I RETENTION $ 10,000
B WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ N / A
(Mandatory in NH)
It yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
A Liquor Liability
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If more space is required)
Restaurants with sale of 30% or more butless than 75% liquor.
City of Monticello is listed as additional insured in regards to the special event being held July 14 & 15th 2017.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
City of Monticello ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
505 Walnut St #1
Monticello, MN 55632 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(CU)
©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 25 (2016103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
Printed by CLJ on June 05, 2017 at 02:15PM
MED EXP (Any one person) $
10,000
1 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $
1,000,000
GENERAL AGGREGATE I $
2,000,000
PRODUCTS-COMP/OPAGG $
11000,000
08093251
07/01/2017
07/01/2018 I Ea accideD SINGLE LIMIT I $
1.000 000
BODILY INJURY (Per person) $
BODILY INJURY (Per accident) I $
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
I (Per accident/
$
4902028700
07/01/2017
07/01/2018 I EACH OCCURRENCE $
1,000,000
AGGREGATE .. _._ $,
1,000,000
WC 190485.05
07/01/2017
PER
07/01/2018 X I STATUTE I EERH
I E.L. EACH ACCIDENT Is
500,000
I E.L. DISEASE- EA EMPLOYE $
500,000
I E.L. DISEASE-POLICYLIMIT� $
500,000
08093251
107101/2017
07/01120181 Liquor 1
1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If more space is required)
Restaurants with sale of 30% or more butless than 75% liquor.
City of Monticello is listed as additional insured in regards to the special event being held July 14 & 15th 2017.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
City of Monticello ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
505 Walnut St #1
Monticello, MN 55632 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(CU)
©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 25 (2016103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
Printed by CLJ on June 05, 2017 at 02:15PM
Chatters Restaurant and Bar with be hosting Diamondback (live band) on Friday July 14th 2017
from 9:OOpm to 1:OOam and a DJ (live music) on Saturday July 15`h 2017. We would like to have the band
& DJ perform on our front parking lot. The band will be facing north towards the restaurant. The
band/DJ will not be facing residential housing. We are also providing a party tent that will cover the
entire band/DJ along with all of our customers which will help with a lot of the noise. We will have a
30x60 ft. tent that will also be fenced off along with a small part of the parking lot. A site plan is
attached to show you what spots we will be using. If you have any further questions please feel free to
contact me at 763-271-0070.
Thank You,
Brooke Steffens -Owner
11
CED4R 5TREET
[SITE FI—AN WSTA7 4 BAR
City Council Agenda: 6/26/17
211. Consideration of approving annual liquor license renewals for 2017-2018 (JS)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City Council is asked to approve the liquor license renewals for 2017-2018 as listed
below. The businesses listed are the current license holders on record and have submitted
their approval for renewal. When paperwork and payment was returned, staff reviewed
each renewal to ensure that paperwork was completed in compliance with State Alcohol
& Gambling rules and state laws. Renewal forms were sent to the County Sheriff for
verification and signature. The completed renewals, following tonight's approval, will be
sent in to the State Alcohol & Gambling Division for their stamp of approval, which
allows the license holders to purchase alcoholic beverages from approved wholesalers.
The City is responsible for issuing the annual licenses and sending them to the licensed
premises, where they are to be displayed on site.
The following licenses are submitted for approval.
Liquor - On -Sale (fee $3,750)
1. Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar (Apple Minnesota LLC)
2. Beef O'Bradys (TMC & J Taylor Corp.)
3. Buffalo Wild Wings #210 (Blazin Wings Inc.)
4. Capitan Pancho Villa (IC Enterprises LLC)
5. Chatters Restaurant & Bar (West River Restaurants Inc.)
6. Cornerstone Cafe & Catering (Cornerstone Cafe & Catering Co.)
7. Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill (Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill Inc.)
8. Monticello Country Club (Monticello Country Club Inc.)
9. Rancho Grande (Rancho Grande Mex. Rest. Inc. #2)
10. River City Extreme (River City Extreme Inc.)
11. VFW 8731 (Club Dorchester)
Liquor — On -Sale, Sundav (fee $200)
1. Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar (Apple Minnesota LLC)
2. Beef O'Bradys (TMC & J Taylor Corp.)
3. Buffalo Wild Wings #210 (Blazin Wings Inc.)
4. Capitan Pancho Villa (IC Enterprises LLC)
5. Chatters Restaurant & Bar (West River Restaurants Inc.)
6. Cornerstone Cafe & Catering (Cornerstone Cafe & Catering Co.)
7. Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill (Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill Inc.)
8. Monticello Country Club (Monticello Country Club Inc.)
9. Rancho Grande (Rancho Grande Mex. Rest. Inc. #2)
10. River City Extreme (River City Extreme Inc.)
12. American Legion Club 260
13. VFW 8731 (Club Dorchester)
Liquor - Club (fee -set by statute based on membership)
1. American Legion 260 - $500
City Council Agenda: 6/26/17
Liquor - Wine/Strong Beer Combination ($1,200)
1. Bluestone Grill (Pauly Companies Inc.)
Liquor — Wine (fee $250)
1. Asian Cafe Sushi Grill Inc.
3.2% Beer - On -Sale (fee $275)
1. Bluestone Grill (Pauly Companies Inc.)
2. Asian Cafe Sushi Grill Inc.
3. China Buffet (Lin, Chuan)
4. Monticello Community Center Concessions at Ballfields (City of
Monticello)
3.2% Beer - Off -Sale (fee $100)
1. Cub Foods (Monticello 1998 LLC)
2. Kwik Trip #177 (Kwik Trip Inc.)
3. Kwik Trip #345 (Kwik Trip Inc.)
4. SuperAmerica #4479 (Northern Tier Retail LLC)
5. Target Store T-2180 (Target Corporation)
6. Wal-Mart Supercenter #3624 (Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Al. Budget Impact: The license fees established for the annual renewals are
intended to cover the costs of the renewal processing.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff prepares and mails the billings, handles the
renewal paperwork and payments, and then issues the licenses after all steps are
completed.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the license renewals for 2017-2018 effective July 1, 2017 to
June 30, 2018.
2. Motion to deny all or selected license renewals at this time.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copies of Renewal of Liquor, Wine, Club or 3.2% Licenses for local businesses
2
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 30773
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Apple Minnesota LLC
Trade Name Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar
City, State, Zip Code *9386 Deegan Ave
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7632956337
License Fees: Off Sale
On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Sf
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
r Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
i 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Enforcemem St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 29468
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name TMC & J Taylor Corp.
Trade Name Beef O'Bradys
City, State, Zip Code 254 W Broadway St
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7633558702
License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's sicnature on this renewal confirms the followinc: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcahol & Gambling Enimmemeni St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 26234
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Blazin Wings Inc.
Trade Name Buffalo Wild Wings #210
City, State, Zip Code *9221 Cedar Street
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 2187225100
License Fees: Off Sale $0.00 On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties.
1: Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol?§ GamblingEntorcemem St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will he approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name IC Enterprises LLC
Trade Name Capitan Pancho Villa
City, State, Zip Code 100 7th Street W
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7633140454
License Fees: Off Sale
On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday
ID# 33416
$200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
i Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer lD Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name West River Restaurants Inc.
Trade Name Chatters Restaurant & Bar
City, State, Zip Code 4181 Cedar St
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7632710070
License Fees: Off Sale
On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday
ID# 22836
$200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Anulicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Eaimcemem St. Paul, MN 55 101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 22042
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Cornerstone Cafe & Catering Co.
Trade Name Cornerstone Cafe & Catering
City, State, Zip Code 154 W Broadway/PO Box 535
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7632953888
License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the followins may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability.
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol& Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 1625
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill Inc.
Trade Name Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill
City, State, Zip Code 9697 Hart Blvd
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7632959990
License Fees: Off Sale $0.00 On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Eaiorcemem St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code ONSS License Period Ending
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Monticello Country Club Inc.
Trade Name Monticello Country Club
City, State, Zip Code * 1209 Golf Course Rd
Business Phone
License Fees: Off Sale
Monticello
7632954653
$0.00 On Sale
6/30/2017 ID# 6356
MN 55362-0575
$3,750.00 Sunday $200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohel & Gambling Enfamemem St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 18063
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Rancho Grande Mex. Rest. Inc. #2
Trade Name Rancho Grande
City, State, Zip Code 615 Locus Street
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 6126167648
License Fees: Off Sale
On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued underthe Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
' Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Enlorcemem St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 42745
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name River City Extreme Inc.
Trade Name River City Extreme
City, State, Zip Code 3875 School Blvd
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7632953390
License Fees: Off Sale $0.00 On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Aanlicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer lD Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 1145
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name VFW 8731
Trade Name Club Dorchester
City, State, Zip Code 713 S Cedar St
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 6122953792
License Fees: Off Sale $0.00 On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Annlicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil uenalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol &Gambling ErAorcemem St. Paul, MN 55 101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code MCLONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 1143
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name American Legion 260
Trade Name
City, State, Zip Code 304 Elm St/Box 806
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone
License Fees: Off Sale
7632952574
$0.00 On Sale $500.00 Sunday $200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Auglicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to reuort anv of the following may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
,Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
3olice/Sheriff Signature Date
signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
&92
Aleohal&Gambling Enfomemem St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES
No license will he approve or released until the $20 Retailer )D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code MWNONSB License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 29481
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Pauly Companies Inc.
Trade Name Bluestone Grill
City, State, Zip Code 9351 Cedar St
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7633140500
License Fees: Off Sale
On Sale $1,200.00 Sunday $200.00
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code 3.2ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 33266
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Pauly Companies Inc.
Trade Name Bluestone Grill
City, State, Zip Code 9351 Cedar St
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7633140500
License Fees: Off Sale
On Sale $1.00 Sunday
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
T innesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code 3.20NSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 63861
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Asian Cafe Sushi Grill Inc.
Trade Name
City, State, Zip Code 514 Pine St
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7632721509
License Fees: Off Sale
On Sale
Sunday
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the followinc may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
A innesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcatml & Gambling Enforcement. St. Paul, MN 55 101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code MWNONSB License Period Ending 6/30/2017 )D# 63860
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Asian Cafe Sushi Grill Inc.
Trade Name
City, State, Zip Code 514 Pine St
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7632721509
License Fees: Off Sale
On Sale $250.00 Sunday
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
® Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcalml & Gambling Enlarcement St. Paul, MN 55 101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code 3.20NSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 15553
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Lin, Chuan
Trade Name China Buffet p 0
City, State, Zip Code �3'1"1 Cedar Street
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7632958300
License Fees: Off Sale
On Sale $275.00 Sunday
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. S4
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to renort anv of the following may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details m back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in Neu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
t Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Enioicemem St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code 3.2ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 22952
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name City of Monticello
Trade Name Monticello Community Center
City, State, Zip Code 2175 W River St
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone 7632713268
License Fees: Off Sale
On Sale $137.00 Sunday
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's siLynature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/CountyAuditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
1VIinnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Eufmcement St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code 3.2OFSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 I[U# 15558
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Monticello 1998 LLC
Trade Name Cub Foods
City, State, Zip Code 216 7th Street
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone
License Fees: Off Sale
7632716800
$100.00 On Sale
Sunday
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Annlicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil aenalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
6Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
936,10 AM 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Etdomsement St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code 3.20FSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 29008
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Kwik Trip Inc.
Trade Name Kwik Trip 4345
City, State, Zip Code 9440 State Hwy 25
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone
License Fees: Off Sale
7632958857
$100.00 On Sale
Sunday
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Aunlicant's sisnature on this renewal confirms the followimn Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil aenalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
EEO 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Eirforcement St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code 3.20FSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 46003
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Kwik Trip Inc.
Trade Name Kwik Trip # 177
City, State, Zip Code 9855 Hart Blvd
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone
License Fees: Off Sale $100.00 On Sale
Sunday
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Sl
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Auplicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to resort anv of the followine may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/ civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
t 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code 3.20FSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 15560
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Northern Tier Retail LLC
Trade Name SuperAmerica 44479
City, State, Zip Code 109 Oakwood Dr
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone
License Fees: Off Sale
7632950444
$100.00 On Sale
Sunday
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. So
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the followim may result in civil nenalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
r Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code 3.2OFSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 22126
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Target Corporation
Trade Name Target Store T-2180
City, State, Zip Code 1447 E 7th Street
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone
License Fees: Off Sale
7632711100
$100.00 On Sale
Sunday
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil aenalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Iff Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222
Alcohol & Gambling EnfoASI;rcement 651-201-7500 Paul, MN 55101
651-201-7500
RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES
No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City
Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the
new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation.
License Code 3.20FSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 19139
ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello
Licensee Name Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Trade Name Wal-Mart Supercenter #3624
City, State, Zip Code 9320 Cedar Street
Monticello MN 55362
Business Phone
License Fees: Off Sale
7632959800
$100.00 On Sale
Sunday
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named
licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si
back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal.
Applicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the followiney: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties.
1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota.
If so, give details on back of this application.
2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota.
If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below.
5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability
Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below.
6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period.
Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where
license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability.
(3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale).
Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date
(Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
County Attorney Signature
County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license).
Date
Police/Sheriff Signature Date
Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report
violations on back, then sign here.
City Council Agenda: 6/26/17
2I. Consideration of approving the Finance Manager to attend 2017 Accela Finance
and Administration National Training in Portland, OR on 7/19/17 through 7/20/17
at an estimated cost of $1,750. (SR)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City Council is asked to consider approving the Finance Manager's attendance at the
upcoming 2017 Accela Finance and Administration National Training in Portland, OR on
July I 91 & 20th. The current City policy allows for out-of-state training for the City
Administrator and Department Heads upon approval of the City Council. The Personnel
Committee recently met to discuss this request and based on the information provided
recommends approval of attendance.
Al. Budget Impact: The estimated cost of attendance is $1,750 including roundtrip
airfare ($500), hotel for 2 nights ($650), conference fee ($500), meals for 3
dinners ($75), and ground transportation in Portland ($25). This training was not
specifically budgeted for in 2017, but there are funds available in the Finance
department's travel and training budget for this conference.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Motion to approve the Finance Manager to attend the 2017 Accela Finance and
Administration National Training in Portland, OR on 7/19/17 through 7/20/17 at
an estimated cost of $1,750.
2. Motion to deny the Finance Manager from attending the 2017 Accela Finance and
Administration National Training in Portland, OR on 7/19/17 through 7/20/17 at
an estimated cost of $1,750.
B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #1. The item was recommended for approval by the
Personnel Committee.
C. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. 2017 Accela Finance and Administration National Training Agenda
B. Personnel Policy Relating to Out -of -State Training
•
Portland,
OR
E Accela
F: Finance P: Payroll S: Systemwide UB: Utility Billing
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM Registration and Breakfast
9:00 AM -10:00 AM Company Update and O&A
10:00 AM -11:00 AM Product Roadmap
11:00 AM -11:45 AM Networking
11:45 AM - 12:30 PM Lunch
Room 1
12:30 PM - 1:20 PM F:
Budgeting (Basic)
Instr: Marti Moore
1:30 PM - 2:20 PM
S:
Cash Receipts for
Managers
Instrs: Carol Almer,
Carolyn Towle
Room 2
S:
Preparing for Audit
Instr: Carolyn Towle
UB:
Online-bills.com
Instr: Valerie Lenk
Room 3
S:
Systems and Security
Instr: Carol Almer
S:
Becoming a Power User
(Basic)
Instr: Marti Moore
2:30 PM - 3:20 PM F: UB: P:
General Ledger Account Management and Payroll Time Entry
Instr: Carol Almer Service Requests Instr: Carolyn Towle
Instr: Valerie Lenk
3:30 PM - 4:20 PM F: UB: F:
Reporting Tools (Basic) New Features Procurement
Instr: Carol Almer Instr: Valerie Lenk Instr: Marti Moore
4:45 PM - 6:30 PM Happy Hour at Accela Portland Office
1000 Broadway Suite 1900, Portland, OR 97205
Each class qualifies as 1 CPE credit. Three classes will be offered during each 50 minute session. The categories are Utility Billing (UB),
Finance (F), Payroll (P) and Systemwide (S). There are no prerequisites for classes, however the suggested skill level is listed next to the
class name where applicable.
E Acce la 2
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM Breakfast
Room 1 Room 2 Room 3
8:30 AM - 9:20 AM F: UB: S:
Fixed Assets Meter Management Becoming a Power User
Instr: Marti Moore Instr: Valerie Lenk (Advanced)
Instr: Carol Almer
9:30 AM - 10:20 AM F: UB: F:
Fixed Assets Billing Reports
Instr: Marti Moore Instr: Valerie Lenk Instr: Carol Almer
10:30 AM -11:20 AM S: UB: S:
Internal Controls Adjustments Customer Information
Instr: Carolyn Towle Instr: Valerie Lenk, Systems Modules
Amanda Babajan, Instr: Carol Almer
11:20 AM - 12:30 PM Lunch
12:30 PM -1:20 PM UB: UB: P:
Past Dues Reporting Payroll Computer Checks
Instr: Valerie Lenk Instr: Carol Almer, Instr: Carolyn Towle
Amanda Babajan
1:30 PM - 2:20 PM
UB:
Balancing UB to GL
Instrs: Valerie Lenk,
Carol Almer
2:30 PM -3:20 PM F:
Budgeting (Advanced)
Instr: Marti Moore
UB:
Online Payments for
Utility Billing, Business
Tax and Business
Licenses
Instrs: Amanda Babajan,
Ken Hoffmann
F:
Reporting Tools
(Advanced)
Instr: Carol Almer
P:
Payroll Processes
Instr: Carolyn Towle
P:
Payroll Tools (Advanced)
Instr: Carolyn Towle
Each class qualifies as 1 CPE credit. Three classes will be offered during each 50 minute session. The categories are Utility Billing (UB),
Finance (F), Payroll (P) and Systemwide (S). There are no prerequisites for classes, however the suggested skill level is listed next to the
class name where applicable.
E Acce la 3
Finance (F)
Budgeting (Basic)
Budgeting is something everyone has to do. Let our software help your organization make
budgeting easy. See some of the new features in the applications, such as Budget Groups, which
support multi-year budgets and position budgeting.
Budgeting (Advanced)
Are you ready for even more information on Advanced Budgeting? This class will provide an
in-depth view of the advanced features available in extended budgeting. Attendees will learn about
budget administration/selection, creating roles to limit user views, editing GL account budgets,
export and import options, committing the budget, and utilities such as copying revisions, copying
entries, generating trend analysis and online budget display.
Fixed Assets
Do you only use Fixed Assets once a year just to book your depreciation? Take a more in-depth look
at Fixed Assets and other features it has to offer, learn about changes made in recent versions that
affect calculation of life and value, and preview upcoming new features. New to Fixed Assets or
evaluating adding the module? Learn about the import process and how it works.
General Ledger
The beating heart of all government agencies. See how to manage your general ledger accounts,
provide access to non -finance employees, journal entry tips and more.
Procurement
This class will cover the procurement process from purchase orders through sending checks to
vendors, as well as requisitions and reporting.
Reports
Are you getting all that you can from the reports in your Accela Software? Join us for a class on
reporting and the different reporting tools the General Ledger has to offer.
Reporting Tools (Basic)
Reporting is a critical part of any organization. This is a two-part class to cover the various
methods of reporting across the application. The first part will focus on standard reports, formats,
publishing and QBE.
Reporting Tools (Advanced)
This is an advanced class that will focus on finance reporting tools such as Query Manager and VRI.
E Accela 4
Payroll (P)
Payroll Computer Checks
Welcome to check processing A -Z. This class will include best practices, off period checks, special
checks, cycles and split periods.
Payroll Processes
Take a more in-depth look at Payroll. See how to use advanced features like Retro -pay and Manual
Checks for making payroll corrections. We will also review the configurable check option, to provide
flexibility and meet new reporting requirements for Oregon and California. We will also take a tour
of payroll reports.
Payroll Time Entry
This class will address general short cuts and tips, and demonstrate how employees can center time
directions into the application and the timesheet approval process. One of the newest features in
Payroll is the ability to enter timecards from a configurable import via Excel. We will also cover how
to publish reports for pay period or quarterly reporting.
Payroll Tools (Advanced)
Learn more about the functionality of the Payroll Employee Wizard and the seamless entry of new
employees. Learn to use the COLA Batch process and Pay Adjustments, and understand how the
HR Module interfaces with Payroll. There will be an overview of Position Control, Plan Templates
and PAF Workflows for electronic approvals.
Systemwide (S)
Becoming a Power User (Basic)
Are you ready to take your skills to the next level? Here's your chance to become a Finance and
Administration Power User! In this series of classes we will cover the application -wide features and
processes that every Accela user should master. This first session will cover general application
settings controlled through the User Preferences window and will provide a detailed investigation
of Accela data grids.
Becoming a Power User (Advanced)
The second class in this series will cover more advanced application features. These include
configurable forms, published reports, batch naming, sharing forms and reports via e-mail.
E Accela 5
Systemwide (S) - continued
Cash Receipts for Managers
If you manage staff that receives cash, you have special concerns. Security and control are
paramount but so are processes, reports, and even hardware concerns like receipt printers and
cash drawers. This session covers CR managerial topics without getting bogged down in the
processing details. You'll learn how to set things up to be safe, secure and efficient.
Customer Information Systems Modules
This class provides an overview of Accounts Receivable, Business Tax, Licenses and Permits,
Special Assessments and Parking Ticket modules. Will provide time for questions and discussion of
how the modules can be used most efficiently.
Internal Controls
Developing and following strong internal controls can be difficult. How much control is necessary?
How much is too much? This session will cover the current best practices for internal controls with
a focus on how to implement them in Accela.
Preparing for Audit
Audits are a necessary part of a finance officer's duty. This class will walk you through tips on how
to prepare for audits and tools that are available in the Accela application.
Systems and Security
This class covers the various details and considerations every Finance and Administration
Administrator should evaluate before setting up security privileges for their organization.
Utility Billing (UB)
Account Management and Service Requests
Signing up a new customer for service is more than just keying in a name and address. There are
a lot of details and considerations, like verifying identity and ensuring service is turned on at the
right time. Learn strategies for efficient management of customer accounts and service orders.
Adjustments
Whether it's a meter misread, a returned payment, or a forgiven penalty, we have the tools to help
you through just about any account adjustment. We even have processes to perform some
adjustments en masse, like refunds or write-offs.
E Acce[a 6
Utility Billing (UB) - continued
Balancing UB to GL
Periodic balancing can be a challenge without a good routine. We'll help you with a range of tools
and reliable processes for balancing your Utility Billing system to your general ledger.
Billing
We know how important your bills are. From calculating charges eight ways from Sunday, to helping
you catch variances before the bill goes out, to printing a truly informative statement for your
customer, we've got you covered.
Meter Management
You've got a lot riding on metering processes — accuracy of bills and accountability for
consumption revenue, just to name a couple. Whether you offer a single metered service or several,
we offer everything from interfaces to meter software, and tools to review and validate readings.
New Features
See the newest features added to the Utility Billing system in the last year, all of which are available
to cloud customers today! Also, see a sneak peak of the roadmap and what's to come.
Online Payments for Utility Billing, Business Tax and Business Licenses
Online Bills processing and PCI compliance. Online Bill enhancements.
Online-bills.com
Be a more efficient utility with the power of Online-bills.com. This is an overview class that will
discuss the benefits of citizen engagement through e -billing, account access and payment
processing.
Past Dues
Automating Journal Entry Topics include importing large journal entries, recurring journal entries,
reversing journal entries and automatic interest allocation journal entries. This session covers
setup and usage of these journal entry processes. We will also discuss how to use automated
processes to correct journal entries committed to incorrect periods.
Reporting
You need reports, we've got 'em! Learn how to make the most of our comprehensive selection of
standard reports. We'll also help you leverage export options and Query by Example for those times
you need to crunch your data in external applications like Excel.
E Acce la 7
18. EMPLOYEE EDUCATION AND TRAINING
The City promotes staff development as an essential, ongoing function needed to maintain and
improve cost effective quality service to residents. The purposes for staff development are to
ensure that employees develop and maintain the knowledge and skills necessary for effective job
performance and employees are provided with an opportunity for job enrichment.
General Policies
A. The City shall encourage training sessions involving employees of the same department
or of similar job classifications where necessary to aid in work performance.
B. Supervisors shall provide an orientation program for new employees.
C. The immediate supervisor shall ensure training is provided for the operation of new
equipment as required.
D. The City encourages contact with personnel from other municipalities and public
agencies in order to learn more efficient job procedures.
E. The City encourages the use of in-house talents and skills in training as well as the
expertise of local citizens, companies and agencies.
F. Training that costs the City money must be approved in advance by the employee's
supervisor.
G. Upon completion of the training the supervisor may request a certificate of completion or
a short summary by the employee.
General Guidelines
General guidelines for training where the City provides financial support and/or time off work
are as follows:
Work interference shall be minimal.
2. Training shall not duplicate recent training.
3. Training costs shall be within budgetary limits.
4. Preference shall be given to training that provides the most benefit to the City at the least
cost.
5. The department head shall ensure that there is adequate coverage of departmental
responsibilities before approving training applications.
6. Training shall relate to an employee's job or health/safety.
7. Efforts shall be made to distribute training equitably within a department.
8. Training shall be structured to provide information that will aid in an employee's growth
or maintenance of professional standards.
9. Temporary, seasonal, casual part-time and intermittent employees shall be excluded
unless approved by their department head. Safety training shall be provided to all
employees.
10. If attendance is required at a seminar, the City will pay tuition/registration fees and
hourly wages for all required hours of attendance. Expenses will be paid in accordance
with standard practices. This applies to regular full-time and part-time employees.
11. Employees should be aware at all times that they are representing the City while
attending any conference, meeting, class or outside training. Employees should conduct
themselves as if they were at work. Improper conduct at any City authorized or
sponsored event reflects poorly on the City and will be subject to disciplinary action as if
it occurred during regular working hours.
National and Regional Training
To be approved for national or regional training sessions, the employees must meet the following
requirements:
Be employed as a regular full-time or benefit -earning part-time employee for a minimum
of six (6) months with the City.
2. Training must be approved in advance by the City Council.
3. Training sessions will normally not exceed five (5) workdays.
4. Council may require an employee reimburse the City for airfare, hotel, and registration
fees for an approved national or regional training event if the employee voluntarily
terminates employment within six (6) months of completion of the training.
The classes of employees eligible for national training sessions (out of the region) are the City
Administrator and Department Heads. Exceptions may be approved by the City Administrator.
All management and supervisory staff are eligible for regional training sessions in Wisconsin,
Iowa, North Dakota, and South Dakota, assuming general guidelines of this policy are met. On
an exception basis, non -supervisory staff may be approved for regional training by the City
Administrator.
Training Sessions Within Minnesota
Professional and technical employees are eligible for training sessions held anywhere within the
State of Minnesota assuming general guidelines of this policy are met. All employees are
eligible for local training (Monticello, St. Cloud or the Twin Cities metro -area) under the same
assumptions. Employees are expected to attend training sessions in the closest proximity to their
work or home.
Pavment or Reimbursement for Training
Whenever possible employees should use their City Purchasing Card to pay for approved
training and follow applicable procedures for substantiation of payment. If not possible, the City
will pre -pay tuition or registration costs directly to the organization sponsoring the training. A
copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and
official starting and ending dates must be provided to the finance department with prepayment
requests. Requests for reimbursement of training costs must include a copy of the conference or
meeting agenda listing registration fees; meals included therein, official start and ending dates
and proof of payment.
Tuition Reimbursement
Full-time and part-time benefited employees are eligible for tuition reimbursement for courses
taken for credit at an approved post -high school educational institution subject to the following
criteria:
A. Courses must be directly related to the employee's present position (whether required for
a degree program or not); or
B. Courses must be directly related to a reasonable promotional opportunity in the same
field of work as present position (whether part of a degree program or not).
C. Courses must be approved in advance of the first day of class by the Department head
and City Administrator in accordance with established procedures and the cost must be
included in the approved City budget. The employee education request should cover any
adjustment in the work schedule that may be necessary.
D. Any costs other than tuition and course materials will not be reimbursed by the City.
E. Employees are required to take courses outside of their work schedule whenever possible.
All work schedule adjustments must be approved by the supervisor.
The City will pay 50% of the cost of tuition and course materials upon successful completion (C
grade), 75% reimbursement upon completion with a `B" or "A" grade. Courses taken "pass/fail"
will be reimbursed at the same percentage as a C grade (if passed). All reimbursements will be
prorated for benefit -earning part-time employees.
The maximum reimbursement will be $1500 per year per employee, subject to budget
limitations. Employees must reimburse the City if they voluntarily leave employment within
twelve (12) months of reimbursement.
Memberships and Dues
The purpose of memberships to various professional organizations must be directly related to the
betterment of the services of the City. Normally one City membership per agency, as determined
by the City Administrator is allowed, providing funds are available. Upon separation of
employment, when allowed by the professional organization, individual memberships paid for by
the City will remain with the City and will be transferred to other employees by the department
head.
*For additional information regarding training and reimbursement procedures contact the Human
Resources Manager or Finance Department.
19. TRAVEL AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
Purpose
The purpose of the travel and reimbursement policy is to establish uniform and consistent
guidelines for the reimbursement of money spent on official city business. The guidelines were
developed using City practices, State regulations, and State Auditor recommendations. The
policy and procedures relative to such travel are contained in the following statement.
Travel by City officials and employees to attend a professional or municipal association meeting
is beneficial to progressive local government. A person engaged in such travel for the benefit of
the City has a responsibility to keep accurate, substantiated records and to submit a request for
reimbursement in accordance with this policy.
Training
Training must be approved in advance by the department head. All out-of-state training must be
approved by the City Council. Whenever possible the City will prepay tuition or registration
costs directly to the organization sponsoring the training. A copy of the conference or meeting
agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and official starting and ending dates
must be provided to the finance department with prepayment requests. If it is not possible to
prepay tuition or registration cost the employee will be reimbursed the cost. Requests for
reimbursement of training costs must include a copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing
registration fees; meals included therein, official start and ending dates and proof of payment.
Travel
Mileage will be reimbursed at the current IRS mileage reimbursement rate. Reimbursable
mileage will be the lesser of actual miles driven from normal work location to
training/meeting/conference location or the actual miles traveled from departure location to
destination less the mileage of commute to normal work location. If this results in the employee
traveling less miles, the City will not reimburse the employee for mileage. When more than one
City employee uses the same personal car for travel, reimbursement shall be based upon the IRS
mileage reimbursement rate, payable to the owner of the vehicle.
Out -Of -State Travel:
All out-of-state travel must be approved by the City Council. A copy of the conference or
meeting agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and official starting and ending
dates must be provided.
Airfare or train fare for out-of-state travel in coach or economy class or the lowest available fare
shall be the preferred mode of transportation. When authorized, an employee may choose to
drive their personal vehicle and will be reimbursed the current mileage rate or the cost of coach
or economy class fare, priced at least 14 days in advance of the travel, whichever is less. If the
employee travels by some other mode than by air, the additional time required over the time the
air would require will be taken as vacation or compensatory time for full and part-time
employees. Fire department personnel will not be reimbursed (paid) for extra time required for
driving. Reimbursement for vehicular travel (meals, mileage, and lodging) shall not exceed what
the total cost of what airline travel would have been.
Local transportation such as taxicab and bus fares to and from airport, train station, lodging and
conference, seminar or meeting is reimbursable only if circumstances require such travel.
Receipts must be submitted for reimbursement. Costs for local transportation not pertaining
directly to City business will not be reimbursed.
Rental Vehicles: Reimbursement for the costs of renting a vehicle shall be made only
when the necessity of such rental is for City purposes.
Travel Credits: Whenever public funds are used to pay for travel or vehicle rental by an
elected official or City employee, any credits or other benefits issued by the provider
must accrue to the benefit of the City of Monticello.
Request for reimbursement must include receipts or statements clearly stating dates and cost of
travel fares paid and/or cost of the transportation paid. Reimbursement for rental vehicles must
include dates of rental, vehicle type and fees paid.
Meals
The City will reimburse the elected official or City employee up to a maximum allowance of,
$12.00 for breakfast, $20.00 for lunch and $25.00 for dinner, including sales tax and
gratuities/tips, whichever is less, while on City business. The reimbursement for gratuity/tip
should not exceed 15% of the total costs of reimbursable costs.
Alcoholic beverages are not eligible for reimbursement.
The limits do not apply when meal expense is included in the cost of the training, conference, or
seminar. Additionally, the City does not reimburse cost on a per diem basis but for actual cost
incurred.
Itemized receipts must be submitted to qualify for reimbursement and must clearly state the date,
name of the establishment (pre-printed form), itemized list of purchased items, total, and gratuity
(if appropriate) of no more than 15%. Reimbursement request without a receipt or non -itemized
credit card receipts will not be reimbursed.
Elected officials or employees may occasionally be in the position of having to provide a meal
for other persons who have official business with the City. In addition receipts for these meals
must include the name of each person attending the meal along with a description of the public
purpose/benefit of the meeting. The actual cost of the meals will be reimbursed in these
instances however the cost of any alcoholic beverages will not be reimbursed.
Lodging
Hotel, motel or other authorized accommodations will be reimbursed at actual cost not to exceed
the base occupancy rate and should be chosen based on reasonableness of cost and proximity to
conference, meeting or training site. Each employee shall be allowed a base room.
Unless previously approved by the City Administrator, overnight stays within 60 miles of the
City will not be reimbursed.
Detail lodging receipts must be submitted for reimbursement. The receipts must include the
dates of the stay, nightly room rate and any incidental expenses charged. Only incidental costs
related to the room charges will be reimbursed.
Lodging costs, unless previously approved by the City Administrator, shall be reimbursable only
from the night preceding a conference, seminar, or training through the night immediately
following such event.
Miscellaneous Exuenses
Hourly employees may receive overtime pay if the training/seminar/meeting hours including
travel to/from exceed normal work hours. The employee's supervisor will approve all overtime
prior to registering for the training/seminar/meeting. If the training/seminar/meeting hours
including travel to/from are less than the normal work hours employees will use vacation or
compensatory time to achieve normal work hours. Employees will be paid eight (8) hours of
paid for training/seminar/meeting, which require overnight stays.
Telephone expenses incurred will be reimbursed only when their necessity for City purpose is
fully accounted for.
Reimbursable parking is limited to daily parking at destination business (meeting, conference,
training, etc.) site and/or hotel site (when applicable). Valet parking and all other parking are not
allowable. Detail receipts including date, times and costs of parking should be provided when
requesting reimbursement.
Gratuities/tips for service providers may be reimbursed as long as reasonable and serve the
public purpose of the trip.
Non -Reimbursable Expenses
The City shall not pay for any expenses, of which the costs are included in the registration fees.
Costs for alcoholic beverages shall not be reimbursed.
The City shall pay no expenses for a spouse/guest who accompanies the city official/employee to
a conference, seminar, or meeting including the incremental lodging expenses of occupancy rates
over base occupancy rates.
The City will not reimburse for personal telephone calls, rental of luxury vehicles, or recreational
expenses such as golf or tennis unless included as part of the registration fees or previously
approved by the City Administrator.
Reimbursement Process
To apply for reimbursement, an elected official/City employee must complete an "Employee
Reimbursement Voucher" form. The completed form with expenditures totaled, detailed original
receipts attached, and signed should be submitted to the Department Head, who shall review and
approve (by signing) such request. The Department Head shall forward the request to the
Finance Department for reimbursement. The Finance Department will review the report and
supporting documentation for completeness and accuracy. If complete the reimbursement check
will be processed during the next regular accounts payable processing. If the request is not
complete or supporting data does not meet policy guidelines, the request will be returned to the
employee.
Any exceptions to this policy must receive approval from the City Administrator whenever
practicable prior to the conference, seminar or training.
City Council Agenda 06/26/2017
2J. Consideration of approving the Communitv Center Director to attend the 2017
National Recreation and Parks Association Conference in New Orleans, LA on
9/25/17 through 9/28/17 at an estimated cost of $1,537. (AM/JO)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City Council is asked to consider approving the Community Center Director's attendance
at the upcoming 2017 National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) conference
held in New Orleans, LA September 25 -28th. The current City policy allows for out-of-
state training for the City Administrator and Department Heads upon approval of the City
Council. The Personnel Committee has urged that the City Administrator as well as all
department directors develop their capabilities, knowledge and network via attendance
their respective national conferences.
B. BUDGET IMPACT
The estimated cost of attendance is $1,537 including round trip airfare ($500), hotel
for 5 nights (free -staying with a colleague from another city), conference fee ($535),
meals ($342), and ground transport to and from airports ($160). This training was not
specifically budgeted for in 2017, but sufficient funds remain available in the MCC's
travel and training budget to cover this request along with other staff training
opportunities as they arise.
C. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the Community Center Director to attend the 2017 National
Recreation and Parks Conference in New Orleans, LA on 9/25/17 through 9/28/17 at
an estimated cost of $1,537.
2. Motion to deny the Community Center Director from attending the 2017 National
Recreation and Parks Conference in New Orleans, LA on 9/25/17 through 9/28/17 at
an estimated cost of $1,537.
D. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The City Administrator and the Personnel Committee recommends Alternative #1
approving out-of-state training for the Community Center Director. Approval of the
request was based on the following criteria: prior attendance, budget impact/cost, and
relatedness to the position.
E. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. 2017 Conference Agenda
B. Personnel Policy Relating to Out -of -State Training
EARLY BIRD DISCOUNT ENDS AU6UST I
i
RL61STER No� AT
�6N R PA National Recreation ���-NRPAAKXONFFRFNU
and Park Association
Because everyone deserves a park
A- J -
-- .� -
The 2017 NRPA Annual Conference is not coming to New Orleans by coincidence. This
event actually has a lot in common with The Big Easy. For one, it's BIG! The conference is
comprised of more than 7,000 total attendees, nearly 500 exhibitors, more than 500 expert
speakers and nearly 300 education sessions. It's also easy in a lot of different ways. It's
easy to make connections with all the networking opportunities. It's easy to be inspired
by the high-caliber speakers. And, sometimes, it's easy to get lost in the awe of the exhibit
hall with such amazing displays to distract you.
The 2017 NRPA Annual Conference is coming to New Orleans September 26-28
and we hope you will be part of the experience.
Come to New Orleans. Come be inspired.
THANK YOU TO THE SPONSORS OF THE
2017 NRPA ANNUAL CONFERENCE
P L-AYC 0 R E
Building communities through play & recreation'"
Burice.
PLAY THAT MOVES YOU
(Gamewme) Greenfields
Outdoor Fitness
PLAT CORE comoaro Promoting Wellness& Fighting Obesity One Community at a Time.
USM
find yourself in the game
XMIki
11('1 111.1.ii1 r
IBIB
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 11
S(ULDULL AT A 6LAN(L
9
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 23 (oaE-coNFERE NCE)
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI) Course
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 24 (PRE -CONFERENCE)
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI) Course
8:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. Aquatic Facility Operator (AFO) Course and Exam
2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. Parks Build Community: Lafitte Greenway Dedication
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25 (PRE -CONFERENCE)
7:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.
Golf Tournament (presented by New Orleans Local Host Committee)
8:00 a.m. -12:00 p.m.
Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI) Exam
8:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
PCW: Choose the Path to Certification CPRP
8:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
Aquatic Facility Operator (AFO) Course and Exam
9:00 a.m. -11:15 a.m.
PCW: Leading to Create Organizational Excellence
9:00 a.m. -12:15 p.m.
PCW: Grant Writing with a Purpose: Connecting Dreams to Resources
9:00 a.m. - 4:45 p.m.
PCW: MarCom Camp: Engage Your Community, Get More People in Your
Parks (Lunch provided)
9:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
Off -Site Institutes (presented by New Orleans Local Host Committee)
12:30 p.m. - 4:45 p.m.
PCW: Agency Accreditation and CAPRA Visitor Training: A Mark of Excellence!
1:00 p.m. - 4:15 p.m.
PCW: President Trump, Attorney General Sessions, and the ADA: Rollback,
Revision, or Racing Ahead for Parks and Recreation Agencies?
2:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.
NRPA Student Recreation Challenge
8:00 p.m. - 9:30 p.m.
Gold Medal Reception (By Invitation Only)
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26
9:00 a.m. -10:30 a.m. NRPA Opening General Session
Disclaimer: Due to unforseeable 1:00 p.m. - 5:25 p.m. Education Sessions
circumstances, this information 5:00 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. Exhibit Hall Happy Hour
may change after printing.
6:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. NRPA Opening Reception: Mardi Gras World (sponsored by GameTime)
PCW = Pre -Conference Workshop WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27
9:00 a.m. -10:30 a.m. Speed Sessions
12:00 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. Research Poster Sessions
2:30 p.m. - 3:45 p.m. George R. Butler Lecture
2:30 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. Education Sessions
6:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. Best of the Best Ceremony (sponsored by Vortex)
7:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. Best of the Best Reception
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 28
7:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. 5k Fun Run and Walk (presented by New Orleans Local Host Committee)
8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Education Sessions
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Off -Site Institutes (presented by New Orleans Local Host Committee)
11:00 a.m. -1:30 p.m. Ethnic Minority Society Luncheon (with the Empty Bowls Project)
----------------------------------------------------------------
2 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference
�J OTA
(Sponsored by US )
The 2017 NRPA Annual Conference is packed full of inspirational and innovative education
sessions and workshops. Nearly 300 education sessions will cover a variety of tracks in an
array of formats. This is the best opportunity for park and recreation professionals to be
challenged and learn from some of the top thought leaders in the field.
Education Formats
A variety of session formats allows attendees to choose
what fits their learning style best by getting out of their
chairs to get active, spending time outside, interacting
directly with speakers and much more.
• NRPA General Session
• Speed Sessions
• Pre -Conference Workshops (PCW)
• Mobile Workshops
• Learning Playground
• Directors' Corner
• Research Sessions
• Off -Site Institutes (OSI)
Education Tracks
11 education tracks allow attendees to follow a track
that best suits their needs, or participate across all
tracks for a well-rounded experience. New this year, the
Aquatics education track is debuting to meet the needs
of the hundreds of aquatics professionals who attend
each year.
• Advocacy
• Aquatics
• Conservation
• Employee/Volunteer Management
• Health & Wellness
• Leadership & Management
• Planning, Design & Maintenance
• Professional Development
• Public Relations/Marketing
• Recreation & Sports Programming
• Research
• Revenue/Customer Service
--------------------------------
4 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference
Earn CEUs to Maintain Your Certifications
Attendees can earn at least 0.1 Continuing Education
Units (CEUs) for attending most education sessions
and have the potential to earn up to 1.8 CEUs total. To
earn CEUs, attendees must attend the entire education
session. Some sessions are not eligible for CEUs and
this will be indicated in the Conference App and the
onsite pocket guide.
New This Year:
• You can now earn 0.1 CEU for attending three
Speed Sessions.
• CEUs will easily be tracked electronically.
^10NDAY, SIPTI�`1PIR 25
PRC -CONFERENCE ORMHOPS
Get the most out of your trip to New Orleans by attending a Pre -Conference Workshop. Covering topics such as
leadership, marketing and communications, accreditation, and certification, these workshops provide hands-on
instruction and in-depth information. The PCWs are eligible for CEUs.
• Agency Accreditation and CAPRA Visitor Training: A Mark of Excellence
• Leading to Create Organizational Excellence
• Choose the Path to Certification — CPRP •
•
• Grant Writing with a Purpose: Connecting Dreams to Resources
• MarCom Camp: Engage Your Community, Get More People in Your Parks
• President Trump, Attorney General Sessions, and the ADA: Rollback, Revision, or
Racing Ahead for Parks and Recreation Agencies?
For detailed descriptions and to register, visit www.nrpa.org/Conference
OFF-SITE INSTITUTES
Sign up for an Off -Site Institute and join the Local Host for an inspiring tour of the unique cultural attractions
in New Orleans. The Off -Site Institutes are eligible for CEUs.
• Rolling Down the River to Jean Lafitte National Historical Park
• Bayou Segnette Park and Swamp Tour [SOLD OUT]
• Recreation District Shares Secrets to Their Success
• A Taste of New of Orleans: Afro -Brazilians, Mardi Gras
Indians. Second Lines and Brass Bands
• Connecting Communities: Walking Workshop on the
Lafitte Greenway
• Eco Tour of Barataria Preserve and Oyster Boat Experience
• Designing and Building a Water Park: Touring BREC's
Liberty Lagoon Flowrider Expansion
• Freeport-McMoRan Audubon Species Survival Center and
Wilderness Park Tour
• New Orleans City Park: Recovery from Hurricane Katrina
• History of New Orleans Through the Eyes of Recreation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 15
TUESDAY, SLPTFhARFR 26
•
•
Education Sessions
ADVOCACY
Overwhelmed by Accessibility? A Quick Guide to Creating Accessible and Inclusive
Temporary Events Elise Niedermeier, Erica Chua, Jennifer Skulski
'Gilt' by Association — We Make You Shine! Eleanor Warmack, Jan Neitzert
Inclusion Success: Myth or Bottom Line to ADA Compliance? Ashley Thomas
Access and Inclusion in Parks & Recreation Brandon Harris, Tiffany White, Tom
O'Rourke, Mariela Fernandez,
Local Government Officials' Views of Park & Recreation Services Alan Graefe, Andrew
Mowen, Austin Barrett
AQUATICS
Designing for Inclusivity: Accessible Play Experiences in the Aquatic Splashpad
Environment John McGovern, Dennis Scott
Managing Risk When Failure Is Not an Option Sandra Kellogg
Drownings in Pools with Lifeguards on Duty: Why Submerged Victims Go Unnoticed
Maria Bella
Three Months of Aquatic Operation Equals One Year's Worth of Work George Deines
CONSERVATION
Birds as a Conservation Tool for Your Community Jennifer Fee
Great Urban Parks Campaign: 4 Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management
Projects in Parks Heather Sage, Laura Connelly, Loretta Pineda, Michael Halicki,
Richard Dolesh
Conservation Partnerships for Parks & Recreation James Gorges, Kent Whitehead,
Michael Hecker
No Naturalists? No Problem! Shannon Burton
EMPLOYEE/VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT
Attracting, Hiring and Developing the Next Generation of Parks & Recreation
Professionals Desiree Tabores, Hazel Bhang Barnett, Sosha Pifer
It's Up to Us: Preventing Child Sexual Abuse in Our Parks Julia Strehlow, Nikki Ginger
Purposed -Based Recognition: Recognizing, Rewarding and Retaining Staff Lori A. Hoffner
HEALTH & WELLNESS
Commit to Health: Walking the Talk Allison Colman
Evidence -Based Landscape Design: Sensory Play Environments Value for Children
with Developmental Disorders Lucy Miller, John McConkey
Evidence -Based Physical Activity Programs for Older Adults Lesha Spencer -Brown,
Shannon Willis, Michele Mercier
Lessons from Living on the Brink Ryan Davis
Outdoor Music Parks: The Landscape of the Future Donna Codd, Ines Palacios,
Richard Cooke
Research That Matters: Helping to Shape the Future of Parks & Recreation Aaron
Hipp, Jason Bocarro, Teresa Penbrooke
Simple Resources to Energize Staff, Children and Families Through Nature Daniel
Hatcher, Jennifer Fee
Community Shuttle Program Michael Bennett, Amy Deck
Fitness Programming Trends and the Well -Qualified Fitness Professional Sheila
Franklin
Inclusive Outreach for Equitable Results: Using a Logic Model for the Get Moving
Initiative Justin Hellier, Lakema Bell
Using Health Data to Power Results George Kosovich, Sarah Olson
LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT
If You're Happy and They Know It, Happy Staff! Positive Psychology and Authentic
Leadership Michael Bork
Creating a Strategy -Focused Organization Barbara Heller
Doing Less with More Through Collaboration David Marquardt, Siqi Zhu, Briana
Hensold, Connie Chung,
Risk Management for Parks & Recreation Dirk Richwine, Kathy Capps
Why Work Culture Matters Ray Ochromowicz, Kim Sellars
Build a 21st Century Diverse Workforce and Inclusive Work Environment at Your
Agency Today Boe Carlson, Denise Barreto
In Conflict with Dakota Indian Tribal Wisdom Jamie Sabbach
Using Economic Impact Data to Tell Your Agency's Park & Recreation Story Kevin
Roth, Terry Clower
Every Employee Matters: Supervisor Toolkit for Recognizing Your Greatest Assets
Annie Olson, Iris Pahiberg Peterson
Lessons from the Legends: America's Expanding Liberal Democratic Tradition Kelly
Bricker, Keri Schwab, Matthew Brownlee, Dan Dustin,
Public Facility Accessibility with Transgender Populations Michael Clark
Quality In/Quality Out: The Intentionality Behind Strategic Partnership Planning Maya
Wyche, Shonnda Smith
Robert W. Crawford Lecture Calvin Mackie
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
6 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference
TULSDAYP S 26
•
PLANNING, DESIGN & MAINTENANCE REVENUE/CUSTOMER SERVICE
How to Portray the Value of Trails in Your Community Beth Poovey, Candace Damon Break Some Rules: Stop Thinking Like a Municipal Employee Kirsten Barnes, Rich DiGirolamo
Planning Backward: An Effective, Simple Approach to Long -Range Planning Stephen Creating a Culture of Guest Service Excellence Neelay Bhatt
Madewell Free to Fee: Tiered Program Services for All! Steven Thompson
Stabilizing Detroit Neighborhoods Through Parks Juliana Fulton, Meagan Elliott
Just Gimme a Number! Jason Moore, Mick Massey
National 10 -Minute Walk Campaign Rachel Banner
Universal Design in a Park and Zoological Setting Mark Trieglaff
Kick Your Park Assets into the 21st Century Todd Reichardt, Troy Sykes
Realizing the Promise & Potential of Smart Parks Bobbi Nance, Edward Krafcik
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
12 Steps to Personal (and Professional) Success Paul Blake
Get Off Your Feet! Develop Better Leadership Skills Using Improvisation Bill Evans
Effective Communication: The Key to Your Long -Term Success M Michelle Bono
The Plight of Middle Management: The Art of Managing Up Jai Cole, Mary Bradford
COAPRT Training Julie Lammel, Ruthie Kucharewski
Agency Accreditation Basics Seve Ghose, Laura Wetherald
COAPRT Visitor Training Jason Bocarro, Doug Kennedy
How to Submit a Winning Session or Speed Session Proposal Lucky DAscanio,
Michael Klitzing
PUBLIC RELATIONS/MARKETING
How to Handle a Parks & Recreation PR Communications Crisis Steve Stoler
Marketing Strategy: From Practical to Practically Insane Ryan Hegreness
Getting the Word Out: How to Promote Your Program/Event/Facility Jill Edwards
RECREATION & SPORTS PROGRAMMING
Boo! Ghosts as a Tool for Public Engagement Mark Nesbitt, Tim Nealon, Richard Fink 11
Using Parks and Rec to Grow the Next Generation of STEAM Innovators Brittany
Lassiter, Lauren Belle
Bullying Among Older Adults Jean Keller
Connect and Energize Your City Through Recreation Dave Lewis, Ryan O'Connor,
Jeffrey Bransford, Carolyn McKnight
Play Ball! MLB Youth Programs & Initiatives Bennett Mayfield, David James
----------------------------------------------------------------
Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 17
V FDNFSDAY, SIPTIMBIR zf
Education Sessions
ADVOCACY
For Richer, for Poorer: The Impact of Socioeconomics in Parks & Recreation Debbie
Woodbury, Tori Spaugh Darensburg
A Communications Frame to Replicate California's Green Justice Work Robert Garcia
AQUATICS
Reinventing the Urban Aquatics System Robin Steinshnider, David Mills
Aquatic Management: Training and Mentoring Senior Staff Chris Chamberlain, James Wheeler
CONSERVATION
Citizen Scientists: Answering the Call of the Wild David Riensche
The Best of Both Worlds: Balancing Conservation and Recreation Jai Cole
5 Things Parks Can Do About Climate Change That Make a Difference Maria Nardi,
Oksana Shcherba
Wildlife Management in a Public Park Setting: Managing the Sometimes
Unmanageable Mark Patterson
EMPLOYEE/VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT
Empower YOUth: Making Youth Work WORK Lakita Watson, Rickeda Fofana
Select, Don't Hire! Kirsten Barnes
Embracing Millennials in the Workplace: Seasonal Employees, Interns and Beyond Julie Knapp
Policies and Procedures for Volunteer Screening and Supervision Betty Swinners
Run!!! The Volunteer Coordinator Person Is Coming Rich DiGirolamo
HEALTH & WELLNESS
Concussion: It Is NOT Just the NFL Paula Powell, Anthony Salvatore
Changing Your Aging Brain Can Be as Simple as Child's Play Denise Medved, Karen Haseley
Designing and Implementing Evidence -Based, Family -Based Programming for Health
Shari Barkin, William Heerman, Emily Stevens, Melanie Hollingshead,
Positioning Local Parks & Recreation as Preventive Public Health Providers Teresa Penbrooke
Transforming Communities and Fostering Social Equity Through Inclusive Play
Spaces John McConkey, Ingrid Kanics
LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT
Stack the Deck in Your Team's Favor Terry Robertson, Keith Fulthorp, Idris Al-Oboudi
Delivering YOUR TED Talk: How to Speak So People Listen Neelay Bhott
Disaster Readiness: Before, During and After the Rain, Wind, Fire Rafael Payan,
Robert Becker, Tom Shuster, Carolyn McKnight,
Park & Recreation Professionals as City Managers Bill Smith
Parks & Recreation 2030 and Beyond Tom O'Rourke
All in a Day's Work Michael Kirschman
CAPRA Accreditation: You Can Do It! Shauna Lewallen
How Do I Keep My Head Above Water? Chris Dropinski, Art Thatcher
PLANNING. DESIGN & MAINTENANCE
City of New Orleans: Strategic Urban Water Management and Recreation
Opportunities Jeffrey Hebert, Katie Dignan
Next Generation Trail Networks: Rails -to -Trails Conservancy's National Portfolio of
Transformative Trail Network Projects Eric Oberg, Elizabeth Thorstensen
Trends in Park Planning and Design Leon Younger, Joseph Webb
TRENDS: The Future of Recreation Centers Craig Bouck, Mick Massey
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
How Chicago, Houston and St. Louis Park Executives Developed Successful Public -
Private Partnerships Joe Turner, Michael Kelly, Susan Trautman
Making Creativity Part of Your DNA M Michelle Bono
Contemporary Trends in Local Park & Recreation Agency Financing and Employment
Kevin Roth, Andrew Mowen, Austin Barrett, Nicholas Pitas
What Is Your Awesome Sauce? Cortni Grange, Atuya Cornwell
PUBLIC RELATIONS/MARKETING
Leveraging Social Media as a Program and Communication Tool Andre Pichly
Too Long, Didn't Read: Web Engagement and Social Media Policy Megan Williams
RECREATION & SPORTS PROGRAMMING
Let's Play Games! Paul Wright
Active Adults: Best of the Best — Part 2 Rhonda Pollard, Teresa Grodsky, Lynda Cochran
Advancing Your Pickleball Programs Shane Wampler
Recreation Program Prioritization: Aligning Your Portfolio with Community Values
Alison Rhodes, Dean Rummel, Austin Hochstetler
Healthy Military Families: A Case Study for ALL Communities Carol Potter, Matt Enoch
REVENUE/CUSTOMER SERVICE
Customer Service Boot Camp: Back to the Basics for Professionals Annie Olson, Iris
Pahlberg Peterson
Financing Parks Projects Without Losing Sleep Caitlin Guthrie, Reggie Hall
40 _ —
n
L
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
8 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference
FDNFSDAY, SIPTIMBIR zf
SPEED SESSIONS
You can earn 0.1 CEU for attending three Speed Sessions.
#NoMoreBoringMeetings Shannon Keleher
Three Resources to Energize Your Next Staff Meeting Daniel Hatcher
A Funding Source to Renovate Your Tennis Facility Todd Carlson
A New Division of Parks and Recreation: Community Engagement Dan Domsic
Ageless Grace: Fun Fitness for the Body and Brain Karen Haseley
All of the Above: Improving Park Access in Land -Constrained Communities Andrew Dobshinsky
Better Together: How to Get the Most Through Collaboration with College
Programs Jayne McGuire
Bridging the Gap — Healthy Army Communities Timothy Higdon
Bringing Civics Back: Introducing a City Government Academy Tony Elliot
Bringing People to Parks: Transit, Transportation Contracting and Rideshare
Alternatives Jonathan Warning
Bringing the Indoors Outside: How to Create Functional Outdoor Gyms That Get
Results Anne -Marie Spencer
Build Your Own Parks and Recreation Employee Mentoring Program Veronica Schulte
Building Your Website Based on Your Customer's Journey, a NOVA Parks Case Study
Brian Bauer
Changing the Way Youth Tennis Looks Anne Davis
Closing the Sale with Exceptional Customer Service Beth Waller
Conducting a Successful Grant Search to Fund Your Project Anne -Marie Spencer
Creating Spaces to Play: Pocket Parks Laurel Richmond
Do We Dare? Sure -Fire Changes for P & R's Future Ellen O'Sullivan
Do You Have a Seat at the Table? Connecting Schools, Communities and Recreation
Priscilla Wright
Do You Have What Sponsors Want? Jasmine Lee
Education: The Difference Between Mediocrity and Excellence in Customer Service Tom Diehl
Facebook, Airbnb and Baby Carrots. What's Their Secret? What Can We Learn from
Them? Ellen O'Sullivan
Future -Proofing Your Organization Keith Hobson
Giving New Life to Senior Center Programing Trisha Weston
Going Smoke Free: The Process, Results and Free Advice Robert Wayt
Healthy Office and Break -Room Makeover: Five Things to Try Next Week Daniel Hatcher
Help Parents Connect with Their Kids on Game Day — Two Phrases That Work Kevin Riley
How Parks and Recreation Can Enhance Racial, Cultural and Religious Harmony in
Our Communities Tom O'Rourke
Improving Social Equity and Preventing Gentrification Through Parks David Rouse
Innovation in 19.5 Minutes Barbara Heller
Innovative Ways to Bring Diversity Programming to Your Recreation Center Cathi Ellis
Joyful Play the Results Driven Way Sharia Shanklin
Kick Your Marketing Up A Notch — How to Develop and Implement an Engaging Brand
Message Nicole Van Winkle
Learning to Create 60,480 New Games in Minutes John LaRue
Let Your Patrons Design Your Program Guide: Why and How to Conduct User Testing
for Redesign Sarah -Kate Sharkey
Making Meetings Matter: When an Email Just Won't Do Kirsten Barnes
Managing Increased Demand for Use of Public Space Kyle Griggs
Nurture Your Employees Through an Engaging Culture Beth Waller
Parks and Recreation Center Standards Manual Cathi Ellis
Photovoice: Involvement That Gives Youth A Community Voice Kimberly Keller
Pickpockets: STEAL the Top Three Techniques for Strategic Communication with Style,
Speed and Skill Sherenia Gibbs
Reclaiming Infrastructure: Increasing Access to Public Space for Community Health
Taylor McNeill
Recommendations for Pizza ... and More! Rob Schoeber
RecStat: Data is the New Bacon Jason Yuckenberg
Social Media Graphics Made Easy Catrina Belt
Steal This Presentation: Making a Case to Invest in Social Media Marketing Matt Carusona
Straight from the Horse's Mouth Shannon Keleher
Swimming with Autism, Physical Difficulties, Anxiety and Sensory Challenges Cindy Freedman
Task Management Made Easy (and Free): Exploring Trello Becky Dunlap
Technology in the Workplace: Innovative Tools for Productivity Becky Dunlap
The Four Universal Pillars of Effective Training George Deines
The Magic of Thinking Big Ray Ochromowicz
The QCC's of Cooking: Sustainable Cooking, Unconventional Lifestyles Nicole Young
The Three I's of Sustainability: Introducing, Interpreting and Implementing a
Sustainability Plan Joey Furuto
The Universal Language of Play Una de Boer
Turning Quality Play into Quality Data Matt Toner
Use Data Provided by Your Community to Justify the Need to Expand and Enhance
Your Organization Tom Diehl
What the Heck is Recreation Program Workload Analysis? Steve Cherveny
What You Need to Know to Get Hired in Parks and Recreation — An NRPA Job Posting
Analysis Gerry Logan
Who's on Your Marketing Team? Mary Cherveny
Win -Win: The Benefits of Strong Customer Relationships Jessica Moran
Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 19
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 2d
Education Sessions
ADVOCACY
Big to Small Ideas of Social Equity Addie Weaver, Claudine Bennett
Proceed with Caution: Emergency Preparedness for Individuals with Disabilities
Genevieve Jennai, Marybeth Dugan
Essential, Indispensable, Vital, Crucial, Fundamental: Redefining Your Park &
Recreation Agency Lisa Paradis
Addressing Homelessness Through Collaboration Troy Houtman, Matt Townsend
Shift into Gear: Considerations for Biking in Your Community
Ines Palacios
Tale of Two Free Summer Meal Programs: Campaign to End Summer Hunger Mark
McCain, Nicholas Forline
New Funding for Parks & Rec Education Programs Through the Every Student
Succeeds Act Sarah Bodor
Use Program Evaluation Data to Increase Your Park Foundations' Fundraising Goals
Nathan A. Schaumleffel, Donald Ortale, Amy Dingle, Leah Salmon,
Collaborating to Enhance Your Parks: Advisory Groups in Action! Becky Kliber, Maria
Dmyterko Stone
AQUATICS
MAHC: Are You Ready? Kevin Post
Why Chlorine Doesn't Cut It: Secondary Sanitizers Risk vs. Reward Nick Rancis
Diving into Diversity: Attracting, Training and Growing a Diverse Aquatic Team Nicole Jacobson
How Loyal Are Your Customers... After the Waterpark Explodes? Nancy Kaiser
Water Wisdom: Planning, Designing and Maintaining Water Play Destinations Chris
Thomas, Tom Norquist
Spray Play for All: Designing Inclusive Spray Grounds and Splash Parks Bill
Hachmeister, John McConkey, Ingrid Kanics
Taking Camps SAFELY to the Pool Sandra Kellogg
The Third -Party Candidate: Other Options in Aquatic Lessons and Certifications Sara
McKay, Alyssa Kellas, Jennifer Fink
CONSERVATION
Ecologically Sustainable Landscapes: Using Nature to Close the Play Gap Emily Roth,
Jaime English
Managing Natural Areas: What's Your Problem?! Christopher Matthews, Jai Cole
The Ecological Age: Ushering a New Age for Parks in the Face of Climate Change Erich
Pfuehler, Ana Alvarez, Brian Holt
Innovative Community Gardening and Its Role in Social Justice and Community
Resilience Serda Ozbenian
Innovative Strategies to Connect Communities to Nature Lori Robertson
Creating a Greenways Maintenance Program Trent Rondot
Connecting People to Local Waterways Through Restoration and Recreation David
Marquardt, Jenny Cox
EMPLOYEE/VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT
10 Tools and Apps for Every Recreation and Park Professional Matt Carusona,
Michelle Wells
Customer Service in a Recreation World Craig Ward, Josh Wells
A Mentoring Program for Large Staff Organizations Debbie Trueblood
I.R.Sted Development Shawna Fachet
Are My Volunteers Engaged? Holli Browder, Christopher Bass
•
HEALTH & WELLNESS
Live Well: Developing a Healthy Workplace for Employees Joseph Lovell
Success Strategies for Outdoor Gyms: Planning, Funding and Execution Allison Abel,
Jennifer French
What Do Your Customers Really Want? Concessions That Are Good for You and Your
Customers Cindy DeBlauw, Natalie Hampton
Back2BasicPlay: The Foundation of Cooperative Games — Addressing Character and
Healthy Play Habits John LaRue
Learn How Communities Are Innovating and Improving Access to Play Spaces for
Children and Families Marla Collum
Community Assets to Improve Rural Health Through Parks & Recreation Rachel
Banner, Mike Meit
Finding Work/Personal Life Balance — Humorous Tales and Helpful Tips Carrie
Fullerton, Janice Hincapie
You Did WHAT in the Heart of Tobacco County?!? Kimberly Boyha, Michael Kirschman
Laughter and Latex Workshop: Beating Stress Silly! Michael Bork
Public -Private Park Partnerships to Achieve Healthy Equity Kellie May
LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT
Helping Teens Understand the Value of Leadership Lori A. Hoffner
Innovative Technology Solutions Felina Harris, Jerrick Gresham
Leading Change: Innovation from the Inside Out Kurtis Baumgartner, Mark Westermeier
Predicting Trends for an Unpredictable Future Leon Younger, Neelay Bhott
A Value Proposition: What's My Park Worth? Brendan Daley
Must Do! Implementing Facility Asset Management for Your Agency Steve Wolter,
William Roche, Jeff Dillon
RUN! They're Talking About Cost Recovery Again Jamie Sabbach
10 Tools for Cost Recovery Jill Slupe
EngAGE in Conversation: Challenges and Solutions with the Aging Lynda Cochran
Know Before You Fly... Managing and Using Drones in Parks Michael Clark
PARC Leadership — Because CRAP Leadership Just Doesn't Have the Same Ring Brad Chambers
'Making Dollars and Sense' the Benefits of Parks & Recreation Art Thatcher
Leadership Development: Understanding Leadership Across Generations Tiffany
Johnson, Dietrich Williams
The Be Attitudes of Influence and Persuasion Ray Ochromowicz, Kim Sellars
Gold Medal Panel Session Brian Zimmerman, Doug McRainey, Tim Dentler, Vincent
Martorello, Jim Randall, Richard Carman, Carol Potter, Jodie Adams
PLANNING, DESIGN & MAINTENANCE
How to Ensure Success with Your Synthetics! Kevin Williams, Todd Johnson
Resiliency Is Not an Option: It's the Future Richard Dolesh, David Barth
Restoration and Resilience of Coastal Systems in Park Design and Planning Roxanne
Blackwell, Jennifer Dowdell, Lauren Crapanzano Jumonville, Andrew Duggan
VOTE! How to Plan a Successful Bond Program Craig Bouck, Ken Sherbenou
Inclusive Play Matters: Whole Child, Whole Environment, Whole Community Solutions
Jennie Sumrell, Lisa Moore
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
10 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 2d
Creating Nature Play Areas in Community Parks Robin Moore, Sarah Konradi, Vonda Martin
Diverse Voices, Diverse Needs: An Interactive Way to Engage and Strengthen Your
Community John Todoroff, Anabel Lopez -Salinas, Nicole Paulsen
Connecting the City: Building the Dallas Trail Network Willis Winters
The Eye of the Beholder: 25 Dimensions of Park Planning and Design David Barth
Portland Off -Road Cycling Master Plan: Metropolitan -Scale Recreation Planning Not
Lopes, Michelle Kunec-North
Parks and R(equity): Leveraging Investments in Parks and Recreation to Create a
More Equitable City David Gould, Kathryn Ott Lovell
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Written Communication: The Right Way, Wrong Way and Army Way Gary Gates
The New Professional's Guide to Career Advancement Dan Carpenter, Jennifer Letourneau
From the Gym to the Office: Navigating Career Advancement Lakita Watson
Gigabyte Gumbo: A Parks & Rec Technology Gameshow Benjamin Denissen, Nick Hermes
You Had Me at Hello: Identifying and Owning Your Style of Communication for Talking
with Teens and Other Tough People Heidi Pope, Sherenia Gibbs
I've Heard of Career Development, But What About Retirement Development?
Michael Mulvaney
COAPRT Visitor Training Jason Bocarro, Doug Kennedy
COAPRT Program Training Julie Lammel, Ruthie Kucharewski
PUBLIC RELATIONS/MARKETING
Once Upon a Time! Using On -Hand Technology to Achieve Your Marketing and
Storytelling Goals Cossi Hayden, Rae Wallace
Practical Solutions for Marketing Youth Sports Programs John Engh
Ditch Your Marketing Plan: Growth Hack Instead Ian Everett
Crisis Communications: When Disaster Strikes, Making Your Agency Shine During the
Storm Cheryl Michelet
Thinking Outside the Block: The Value of Historic Properties in Parks & Recreation
Gina Vaughan, Juanita Moore-Akida, Sheila Taylor
RECREATION & SPORTS PROGRAMMING
Creating Meaningful Arts Programs Designed to Engage the Community Amy McBride,
Mary Tuttle
How to Set Up Your Summer for Success: Summer Should Be Fun! Julio Santiago, Greg Bisson
Tetrads: A Creative, Fun, Thought -Provoking Program Development Tool Rich DiGirolomo
Laureus Model City: Values in Motion Jamie Schmill
Are You ALL In? Aron Hall, Diane Ridderhoff, Felicia Barnhart, Sarah Braun
Small -Town Recreation: Senior Trips A -Z and More! Cindy Hazelton, Lucky D'Ascanio
Team Sports Participation Scouting Report Dustin Dobrin, Nick Rigitano
The Inward, Outward and Onward Success of a Louisiana Mobile Outreach Program:
BREC on the GEAUX Diane Drake, Michael King
Re -LAX: Programming Youth Lacrosse in Your Community TonyAlbertina, Rachael Bishop
REVENUE/CUSTOMER SERVICE
Recreation: The 5 -Star Way Paul Shockley, Kari Bowman
10 Steps to Branding Your Park District's F&B Operation: A Case Study in Doubling
Revenue Mike Holtzman
Using Economic Impact Data to Demonstrate an Agency's Relevance Chris Nunes
Topline Growth: Growing Golf Revenues in a Stagnant Market Adam Kempton, Bill Rehanek
Grant Seeking That Scores Leigh Hersey
RESEARCH
Health and Quality of Life I
How Do Different Aspects of Leisure Impact Broader Well -Being? Shintaro Kono,
Gordon Walker
Healthcare Costs Associated with Physical Activity: Evidence from U.S. Counties
Mikihiro Sato, Yuhei Inoue, James Du
Health and Quality of Life II
Older Adults' Leisure Activities: Predictors of Social Relationships and Positive Affect
Sunwoo Lee, Jungsu Ryu, Jinmoo Heo
Leisure Perceptions and Attitudes toward Retirement Chungsup Lee, Jaesung An,
Laura Payne
Health and Quality of Life III
Leisure, Social Support and Life Satisfaction among Individuals with Physical Disability
Hyunmin Tim Yang
Sports Related Serious Leisure and School Adaptation Chungsup Lee, Sohye Kim,
Megan Owens, Toni Liechty
Youth and Family I
Using Observation to Improve Coach -Created Climate and Youth Development Eric
Legg, Aubrey Newland
Engaging Youth through High Quality Programming to Promote Outcome Achievement
Troy Bennett
Youth and Family II
Impact Assessment of Youth Knowledge and Attitudes toward Water Safety: An
Update William Ramos, Austin Anderson, Angela Beale
Use of Motion Monitoring Devices and Its Influence on Level and Perception of Active
Recreation among Families in Rural Communities Iryna Sharaievska, Jennifer
Zwetsloot, Rebecca Battista
Administration and Programming I
Administrative Roles in Recreation Management: Testing a Model Jo An Zimmermann
Toward Attachment: Motivation and Retention of Small Sporting Event Participants
Keri Schwab, Morni Goldenberg, Kevin Lin, Paula Kreider
Administration and Programming II
Campus Recreation Outdoor Programs' Effect on College Students' Stress Reduction
Yun Chang, Curt Davidson, Seann Conklin, Alan Ewert
Significant Camp Experiences from Youth with Different Psychosocial Identity Statuses
Cindy Hartman, Ann Gillard, Patti Craig
Gender and Recreation
(Re)productive Women in the (Re)creation Vocation Anna Mousolf
Community Project with Women of La Capri, San Jose, Costa Rica: Photographic
Documentation of Recreation Experiences in an Urban Setting Susana Juniu, Yuhei
Inoue, Carmen Grace Salazar Solas
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 111
LIU1011 HALL U16UL16UTS
Try It Before You Buy It
More than 400 exhibitors will be showcasing
amazing new products and services.
Exhibit Hall Happy Hour
Stick around the Exhibit Hall for a fun -filled
hour of socializing, testing new products, and
enjoying food and beverages.
Prizes and Cash Giveaways
Visit the Exhibit Hall for hourly gift card
giveaways (sponsored by Toro) and cash prize
drawings during the Happy Hour.
Mardi Gras Cash Bonanza
The $2,000 cash grand prize will be given to one
lucky attendee between 1:00 p.m. and 2:30 p.m.
on Wednesday afternoon. You must be present
to win so make sure you are in the exhibit hall
Wednesday afternoon!
Learning Playground
The most interactive education sessions happen in
the Learning Playground, where you will get out of
your seat and collaborate with other attendees.
EXPOdition Scavenger Hunt
(sponsored by Burke Playgrounds)
Complete the Exhibit Hall scavenger hunt for a
chance to win iPads, FitBits, 2018 NRPA Annual
Conference registrations, gift cards and more!
ej) Greenfields
Outdoor Fitness.
Push Your Limits on Greenfields'
Cross Fitness Rig!
Greenfields brings new opportunities for high-
intensity workouts to the outdoor environment
with the 13 -Person Cross Fitness Rig. Dips. Pull-
ups. Push-ups. Crunches. Leg raises. Knee raises.
Wall ball. And more! The Rig rounds out Greenfields'
multifaceted product line, providing exercises
to advanced users. Embrace the challenge of
functional fitness with Greenfields!
X.9
----------------------------------------------------------------
12 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference
HY SHOULD f ATTEND?
• 75% of attendees come to network. Whether that means meeting new people,
reconnecting with colleagues or learning from the best in the business, there are many
opportunities to network.
• You need to try it before you buy it, right? Visit the Exhibit Hall to test out amazing
cutting edge equipment and products from top brands.
• 88% of past attendees have been satisfied with their overall experience — you can be too!
• Everyone will be there! Don't be left out of the largest
annual gathering of park and recreation professionals
under one roof.
• With hundreds of top speakers, nearly 300 sessions
and 11 education tracks, you are guaranteed to learn
something new and leave inspired.
JUSTIFI(ATION TIPS
Sometimes travel budgets can be tight and it might be hard to convince your employer that
it is important to attend a national conference. We want to see all of you at the NRPA Annual
Conference, so we have put together some tips on how you can talk with your employer about
the value of attending.
1. Review the education sessions and plan your schedule. Create an outline of the sessions you
want to attend and how they'll support your work. Select sessions that are most beneficial to
you, your team, community and your agency. Present this to your supervisors or those who
are approving your travel.
2. Show value through CEUs. Education is paramount at the NRPA Annual Conference. Majority
of sessions earn you CEU credits, so tally up the number of credits you will get for attending
sessions and Pre -Conference Workshops to show the value of attending.
3. Share your great ideas. You are guaranteed to leave New Orleans inspired and filled with
great ideas, so when discussing your attendance at the event, commit to a post -conference
presentation for your team, town council, board, etc. Plan to highlight what you learned and
tie your training to your organization's challenges, goals and strategic plans.
For more tips and to download an approval request letter template, visit www.nrpa.org/Conference
---------------------------------------------------------------
Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 115
AYS TO SAVE
• Save up to $250 by registering before the Early Bird deadline, August 1.
• NRPA Premier Member Agencies who purchase four full package registrations receive the fifth
registration for FREE!
• Become a member! Non-members receive one year
of membership with registration. Members enjoy so
many great benefits, even beyond the conference.
• Volunteer and your registration fee can be greatly
reduced or you may even be able to attend for free.
• Get the most out of your trip by adding a
Pre -Conference Workshop
•
R161STRATION [[IS
ALL EDUCATION SESSIONS
✓
✓
✓
NRPA OPENING GENERAL SESSION
✓
✓
✓
✓
EXHIBIT HALL DAILY ADMISSION
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
NRPA RESEARCH POSTER SESSIONS
✓
✓
✓
NRPA OPENING RECEPTION
✓
✓
✓
EXHIBIT HALL HAPPY HOUR
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
EARLY BIRD: On or Before 81112017
Member
$535
$435
$0
$145
$375
Non-member
$765*
$575*
$95*
$195
$375
REGULAR: After 81112017, Before 912412017
Member
$695
$595
$0
$195
$395
Non-member
$945*
$765*
$115*
$245
$395
ONSITE: On or After 912412017
Member
$735
$635
$0
$195
$405
Non-member
$1015*
$815*
$150*
$245
$405
*These nonmember registration fees automatically include individual membership to NRPA for one-year.
** Young Professionals are defined as anyone 35 years and younger.
***Students are defined as anyone who is currently enrolled as a full-time or part-time student pursuing a degree in parks, recreation, conservation, or related matters, and
is not simultaneously employed as a full-time professional.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
16 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference
HOVv` TO R161SILR
ONLINE:
www.nrpa.org/Conference
PHONE OR FAX:
P: 800.385.8010
F: 972.349.7715
HOTEL INE0Rr1Al1oN
r
MAI L:
Print the paper form at
www.nrpa.org/Conference
"+r
y.
New Orleans Ernest N. Nbrial
c
Courtyard NO Downtown/Convention
Yi'M %01 !
v. A"n r
Convention Center
Center
r
'
0.1 miles from the Center
L
Embassy Suites NO Convention Center
Hampton Inn &Suites NOConvention
at
r^.
0.1 miles from the Center
Center
Across the street from the Center
Q
ti
Hilton New Orleans Riverside
0.4 miles from the Center
Hyatt Place NO Convention Center
Across the Street from the Center
Le Ivbridien New Orleans
Loews New Orleans Hotel
4
0.4 miles from the Center
0.4 miles from the Center
"
New Orleans Ivbmott
Omni Riverfront New Orleans
0.7 miles from the Center
�
n
r
m
4 n
� �ulra
.rsr,�
o SY
r
MAI L:
Print the paper form at
www.nrpa.org/Conference
19 DoubleTree by Hilton New Orleans
0.5 miles from the Center
Hilton Garden Inn NO Convention
Center
0.1 miles from the Center
JW lvbrriottNew Or eans
0.7 miles from the Center
New Orleans Downtown Ivbmott at the
Convention Center
Across the Streetfrom the Center
Sheraton New Orleans Hotel
0.7 miles from the Center
1pSpringhill Suites byWrriottConvention Renaissance New Orleans Arts Residence Inn byWrriott New Orleans
Center III Warehouse District Hotel - Downtown
0.1 miles from the Center 0.3 miles from Center 0.3 miles from the Center
The Westin New Orleans Canal Place
0.6 miles from the Center
r;3
e'rld.a &
iouih.rn 41
"+r
y.
New Orleans Ernest N. Nbrial
c
Courtyard NO Downtown/Convention
Yi'M %01 !
v. A"n r
Convention Center
Center
fi
0.1 miles from the Center
Embassy Suites NO Convention Center
Hampton Inn &Suites NOConvention
at
r^.
0.1 miles from the Center
Center
Across the street from the Center
Q
4
Hilton New Orleans Riverside
0.4 miles from the Center
Hyatt Place NO Convention Center
Across the Street from the Center
Le Ivbridien New Orleans
Loews New Orleans Hotel
4
0.4 miles from the Center
0.4 miles from the Center
New Orleans Ivbmott
Omni Riverfront New Orleans
0.7 miles from the Center
0.1 miles from the Center
19 DoubleTree by Hilton New Orleans
0.5 miles from the Center
Hilton Garden Inn NO Convention
Center
0.1 miles from the Center
JW lvbrriottNew Or eans
0.7 miles from the Center
New Orleans Downtown Ivbmott at the
Convention Center
Across the Streetfrom the Center
Sheraton New Orleans Hotel
0.7 miles from the Center
1pSpringhill Suites byWrriottConvention Renaissance New Orleans Arts Residence Inn byWrriott New Orleans
Center III Warehouse District Hotel - Downtown
0.1 miles from the Center 0.3 miles from Center 0.3 miles from the Center
The Westin New Orleans Canal Place
0.6 miles from the Center
r;3
e'rld.a &
iouih.rn 41
"+r
y.
thr Nffjl rLr
0
c
9
Yi'M %01 !
v. A"n r
TV-,, w
fi
Ernest N. Morial Convention Center
900 Convention Center Blvd.
New Orleans, LA 70130
BOOK YOUR HOTEL ROOM
Hotels will sell out quickly. Book your hotel reservation in the NRPA
housing block as soon as you register.
Online: www.nrpa.org/Conference
By phone: 888.385.8010
To book a room in the NRPA block at certain hotels near the
convention complex you must register for the conference first. For a
list of these hotels, please visit www.nrpa.org/Conference
NRPA reserves the right to cancel reservations in the official conference housing
block if the occupants have not registered for the 2017 NRPA Annual Conference
by August 25
For more details, visit www.nrpa.org/Conference
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 117
18. EMPLOYEE EDUCATION AND TRAINING
The City promotes staff development as an essential, ongoing function needed to maintain and
improve cost effective quality service to residents. The purposes for staff development are to
ensure that employees develop and maintain the knowledge and skills necessary for effective job
performance and employees are provided with an opportunity for job enrichment.
General Policies
A. The City shall encourage training sessions involving employees of the same department
or of similar job classifications where necessary to aid in work performance.
B. Supervisors shall provide an orientation program for new employees.
C. The immediate supervisor shall ensure training is provided for the operation of new
equipment as required.
D. The City encourages contact with personnel from other municipalities and public
agencies in order to learn more efficient job procedures.
E. The City encourages the use of in-house talents and skills in training as well as the
expertise of local citizens, companies and agencies.
F. Training that costs the City money must be approved in advance by the employee's
supervisor.
G. Upon completion of the training the supervisor may request a certificate of completion or
a short summary by the employee.
General Guidelines
General guidelines for training where the City provides financial support and/or time off work
are as follows:
Work interference shall be minimal.
2. Training shall not duplicate recent training.
3. Training costs shall be within budgetary limits.
4. Preference shall be given to training that provides the most benefit to the City at the least
cost.
5. The department head shall ensure that there is adequate coverage of departmental
responsibilities before approving training applications.
6. Training shall relate to an employee's job or health/safety.
7. Efforts shall be made to distribute training equitably within a department.
8. Training shall be structured to provide information that will aid in an employee's growth
or maintenance of professional standards.
9. Temporary, seasonal, casual part-time and intermittent employees shall be excluded
unless approved by their department head. Safety training shall be provided to all
employees.
10. If attendance is required at a seminar, the City will pay tuition/registration fees and
hourly wages for all required hours of attendance. Expenses will be paid in accordance
with standard practices. This applies to regular full-time and part-time employees.
11. Employees should be aware at all times that they are representing the City while
attending any conference, meeting, class or outside training. Employees should conduct
themselves as if they were at work. Improper conduct at any City authorized or
sponsored event reflects poorly on the City and will be subject to disciplinary action as if
it occurred during regular working hours.
National and Regional Training
To be approved for national or regional training sessions, the employees must meet the following
requirements:
Be employed as a regular full-time or benefit -earning part-time employee for a minimum
of six (6) months with the City.
2. Training must be approved in advance by the City Council.
3. Training sessions will normally not exceed five (5) workdays.
4. Council may require an employee reimburse the City for airfare, hotel, and registration
fees for an approved national or regional training event if the employee voluntarily
terminates employment within six (6) months of completion of the training.
The classes of employees eligible for national training sessions (out of the region) are the City
Administrator and Department Heads. Exceptions may be approved by the City Administrator.
All management and supervisory staff are eligible for regional training sessions in Wisconsin,
Iowa, North Dakota, and South Dakota, assuming general guidelines of this policy are met. On
an exception basis, non -supervisory staff may be approved for regional training by the City
Administrator.
Training Sessions Within Minnesota
Professional and technical employees are eligible for training sessions held anywhere within the
State of Minnesota assuming general guidelines of this policy are met. All employees are
eligible for local training (Monticello, St. Cloud or the Twin Cities metro -area) under the same
assumptions. Employees are expected to attend training sessions in the closest proximity to their
work or home.
Pavment or Reimbursement for Training
Whenever possible employees should use their City Purchasing Card to pay for approved
training and follow applicable procedures for substantiation of payment. If not possible, the City
will pre -pay tuition or registration costs directly to the organization sponsoring the training. A
copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and
official starting and ending dates must be provided to the finance department with prepayment
requests. Requests for reimbursement of training costs must include a copy of the conference or
meeting agenda listing registration fees; meals included therein, official start and ending dates
and proof of payment.
Tuition Reimbursement
Full-time and part-time benefited employees are eligible for tuition reimbursement for courses
taken for credit at an approved post -high school educational institution subject to the following
criteria:
A. Courses must be directly related to the employee's present position (whether required for
a degree program or not); or
B. Courses must be directly related to a reasonable promotional opportunity in the same
field of work as present position (whether part of a degree program or not).
C. Courses must be approved in advance of the first day of class by the Department head
and City Administrator in accordance with established procedures and the cost must be
included in the approved City budget. The employee education request should cover any
adjustment in the work schedule that may be necessary.
D. Any costs other than tuition and course materials will not be reimbursed by the City.
E. Employees are required to take courses outside of their work schedule whenever possible.
All work schedule adjustments must be approved by the supervisor.
The City will pay 50% of the cost of tuition and course materials upon successful completion (C
grade), 75% reimbursement upon completion with a "B" or "A" grade. Courses taken "pass/fail"
will be reimbursed at the same percentage as a C grade (if passed). All reimbursements will be
prorated for benefit -earning part-time employees.
The maximum reimbursement will be $1500 per year per employee, subject to budget
limitations. Employees must reimburse the City if they voluntarily leave employment within
twelve (12) months of reimbursement.
Memberships and Dues
The purpose of memberships to various professional organizations must be directly related to the
betterment of the services of the City. Normally one City membership per agency, as determined
by the City Administrator is allowed, providing funds are available. Upon separation of
employment, when allowed by the professional organization, individual memberships paid for by
the City will remain with the City and will be transferred to other employees by the department
head.
*For additional information regarding training and reimbursement procedures contact the Human
Resources Manager or Finance Department.
19. TRAVEL AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
Purpose
The purpose of the travel and reimbursement policy is to establish uniform and consistent
guidelines for the reimbursement of money spent on official city business. The guidelines were
developed using City practices, State regulations, and State Auditor recommendations. The
policy and procedures relative to such travel are contained in the following statement.
Travel by City officials and employees to attend a professional or municipal association meeting
is beneficial to progressive local government. A person engaged in such travel for the benefit of
the City has a responsibility to keep accurate, substantiated records and to submit a request for
reimbursement in accordance with this policy.
Training
Training must be approved in advance by the department head. All out-of-state training must be
approved by the City Council. Whenever possible the City will prepay tuition or registration
costs directly to the organization sponsoring the training. A copy of the conference or meeting
agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and official starting and ending dates
must be provided to the finance department with prepayment requests. If it is not possible to
prepay tuition or registration cost the employee will be reimbursed the cost. Requests for
reimbursement of training costs must include a copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing
registration fees; meals included therein, official start and ending dates and proof of payment.
Travel
Mileage will be reimbursed at the current IRS mileage reimbursement rate. Reimbursable
mileage will be the lesser of actual miles driven from normal work location to
training/meeting/conference location or the actual miles traveled from departure location to
destination less the mileage of commute to normal work location. If this results in the employee
traveling less miles, the City will not reimburse the employee for mileage. When more than one
City employee uses the same personal car for travel, reimbursement shall be based upon the IRS
mileage reimbursement rate, payable to the owner of the vehicle.
Out -Of -State Travel:
All out-of-state travel must be approved by the City Council. A copy of the conference or
meeting agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and official starting and ending
dates must be provided.
Airfare or train fare for out-of-state travel in coach or economy class or the lowest available fare
shall be the preferred mode of transportation. When authorized, an employee may choose to
drive their personal vehicle and will be reimbursed the current mileage rate or the cost of coach
or economy class fare, priced at least 14 days in advance of the travel, whichever is less. If the
employee travels by some other mode than by air, the additional time required over the time the
air would require will be taken as vacation or compensatory time for full and part-time
employees. Fire department personnel will not be reimbursed (paid) for extra time required for
driving. Reimbursement for vehicular travel (meals, mileage, and lodging) shall not exceed what
the total cost of what airline travel would have been.
Local transportation such as taxicab and bus fares to and from airport, train station, lodging and
conference, seminar or meeting is reimbursable only if circumstances require such travel.
Receipts must be submitted for reimbursement. Costs for local transportation not pertaining
directly to City business will not be reimbursed.
Rental Vehicles: Reimbursement for the costs of renting a vehicle shall be made only
when the necessity of such rental is for City purposes.
Travel Credits: Whenever public funds are used to pay for travel or vehicle rental by an
elected official or City employee, any credits or other benefits issued by the provider
must accrue to the benefit of the City of Monticello.
Request for reimbursement must include receipts or statements clearly stating dates and cost of
travel fares paid and/or cost of the transportation paid. Reimbursement for rental vehicles must
include dates of rental, vehicle type and fees paid.
Meals
The City will reimburse the elected official or City employee up to a maximum allowance of,
$12.00 for breakfast, $20.00 for lunch and $25.00 for dinner, including sales tax and
gratuities/tips, whichever is less, while on City business. The reimbursement for gratuity/tip
should not exceed 15% of the total costs of reimbursable costs.
Alcoholic beverages are not eligible for reimbursement.
The limits do not apply when meal expense is included in the cost of the training, conference, or
seminar. Additionally, the City does not reimburse cost on a per diem basis but for actual cost
incurred.
Itemized receipts must be submitted to qualify for reimbursement and must clearly state the date,
name of the establishment (pre-printed form), itemized list of purchased items, total, and gratuity
(if appropriate) of no more than 15%. Reimbursement request without a receipt or non -itemized
credit card receipts will not be reimbursed.
Elected officials or employees may occasionally be in the position of having to provide a meal
for other persons who have official business with the City. In addition receipts for these meals
must include the name of each person attending the meal along with a description of the public
purpose/benefit of the meeting. The actual cost of the meals will be reimbursed in these
instances however the cost of any alcoholic beverages will not be reimbursed.
Lodgina,
Hotel, motel or other authorized accommodations will be reimbursed at actual cost not to exceed
the base occupancy rate and should be chosen based on reasonableness of cost and proximity to
conference, meeting or training site. Each employee shall be allowed a base room.
Unless previously approved by the City Administrator, overnight stays within 60 miles of the
City will not be reimbursed.
Detail lodging receipts must be submitted for reimbursement. The receipts must include the
dates of the stay, nightly room rate and any incidental expenses charged. Only incidental costs
related to the room charges will be reimbursed.
Lodging costs, unless previously approved by the City Administrator, shall be reimbursable only
from the night preceding a conference, seminar, or training through the night immediately
following such event.
Miscellaneous Expenses
Hourly employees may receive overtime pay if the training/seminar/meeting hours including
travel to/from exceed normal work hours. The employee's supervisor will approve all overtime
prior to registering for the training/seminar/meeting. If the training/seminar/meeting hours
including travel to/from are less than the normal work hours employees will use vacation or
compensatory time to achieve normal work hours. Employees will be paid eight (8) hours of
paid for training/seminar/meeting, which require overnight stays.
Telephone expenses incurred will be reimbursed only when their necessity for City purpose is
fully accounted for.
Reimbursable parking is limited to daily parking at destination business (meeting, conference,
training, etc.) site and/or hotel site (when applicable). Valet parking and all other parking are not
allowable. Detail receipts including date, times and costs of parking should be provided when
requesting reimbursement.
Gratuities/tips for service providers may be reimbursed as long as reasonable and serve the
public purpose of the trip.
Non -Reimbursable Expenses
The City shall not pay for any expenses, of which the costs are included in the registration fees.
Costs for alcoholic beverages shall not be reimbursed.
The City shall pay no expenses for a spouse/guest who accompanies the city official/employee to
a conference, seminar, or meeting including the incremental lodging expenses of occupancy rates
over base occupancy rates.
The City will not reimburse for personal telephone calls, rental of luxury vehicles, or recreational
expenses such as golf or tennis unless included as part of the registration fees or previously
approved by the City Administrator.
Reimbursement Process
To apply for reimbursement, an elected official/City employee must complete an "Employee
Reimbursement Voucher" form. The completed form with expenditures totaled, detailed original
receipts attached, and signed should be submitted to the Department Head, who shall review and
approve (by signing) such request. The Department Head shall forward the request to the
Finance Department for reimbursement. The Finance Department will review the report and
supporting documentation for completeness and accuracy. If complete the reimbursement check
will be processed during the next regular accounts payable processing. If the request is not
complete or supporting data does not meet policy guidelines, the request will be returned to the
employee.
Any exceptions to this policy must receive approval from the City Administrator whenever
practicable prior to the conference, seminar or training.
City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017
2K. Consideration of a request Development Stage Planned Unit Development and
Preliminary Plat for Spaeth Industrial Park for a multi -lot industrial
development in an 1-2 (Heavv Industrial) District. Applicant: Spaeth, Ken
(NAC/AS)
Property: Legal: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park
PID: 155018003020
Planning Case Number: 2017-017
A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND:
Request(s): Subdivide an existing 4.4 acre industrial parcel along
the south side of Dundas Road into eight separate
parcels, each accommodating a single building and
parking bay, along with easement access to common
truck circulation areas, utilities, stormwater
management, and access drives.
Deadline for Decision: July 7th, 2017
Land Use Designation: Places to Work
Zoning Designation: I-2, Heavy Industrial
The purpose of the "I-2," Heavy Industrial District is to
provide for the establishment of heavy industrial and
manufacturing development and use which because of
the nature of the product or character of activity
requires isolation from residential or commercial use
Overlays/Environmental
Regulations Applicable: NA
Current Site Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Uses:
North:
Industrial
East:
Industrial
South:
Multi -family Residential
West:
Industrial
Project Description: The applicant is proposing a multi -lot and building
industrial park. Each building is 6,976 square feet in
area, for a cumulative total of 55,808 square feet of
floor area. Because only the front two parcels front on
City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017
Dundas Road, with 6 parcels served by an internal
private common drive, the project requires PUD
zoning.
The layout of the project relies on a perimeter drive that
provides access to, alternatively, parking areas serving
the front access points of the buildings, then common
truck courts that provide truck access to the service
sides of each building. The parking and "front" access
areas face outward to the north and south of the parcel,
including toward Dundas Road on the north, and
toward a stormwater pond and then the residential
development to the south. The truck and service
portions of each of the buildings is internal to the
project.
The project is anticipated to attract smaller individual
industrial concerns that require spaces for office,
fabrication, repair, warehousing, and possibly, limited
areas of showroom. Occupants would have the
opportunity to purchase individual lots subject to the
overall PUD and association management requirements.
Each building has about 12 parking spaces allocated to
their parcel, however, it will be necessary that the
parking and grounds will be commonly maintained
under an association, so parking quantities would be
shared between parcels.
ANALYSIS
This project was reviewed as a Concept Planned Unit Development proposal earlier
this spring. The proposed Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD plans follow
the layout of the concept plan. Traffic will enter the one-way perimeter drive aisle on
the west side of the property, and enter the parking bays, or truck courts, as
appropriate. Typically, the parking bays will provide access to the front entry/office
spaces for each of the buildings. The truck court areas will provide access for
delivery vehicles or company trucks, etc. to overhead doors for loading and unloading
purposes. Exiting traffic will circulate to the east side of the property to leave via the
one-way exit lane.
Because the perimeter lanes are designed for one-way traffic only, at 20 feet in width,
it will be important to properly sign the site to ensure that the drives will function as
designed. "Enter Only" or "Exit Only" signs, as well as pavement markings, should
be planned to direct traffic as needed. The City Engineer has provided comment on
the applicant's circulation plan.
City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017
As the site circulation relies on clear routes for the fully -developed parcel, it will be
important that no outdoor storage occurs on the parcels as platted. This would
include trash disposal, which should be handled indoors. For large vehicles to meet
turning movements in and out of the truck courts, they must remain clear of
obstruction. As a note, the applicant should update the truck -turning templates to
show full-size semi -trucks in and out of the truck court areas - the current template
follows the center -line, which limits truck turning. It is expected that there is
adequate room using the full width of the truck court, but this should be verified by
the applicant.
Other staff analysis of the proposal includes the following:
Landscapinz. Quantities for landscaping are consistent with the City's general
landscape requirements, and include a planting of spruce trees along the south
boundary which will screen the use from the abutting residential area. Combined
with the ponding area in this location, the plan meets the separation requirements of
the bufferyard regulations (at least 20 feet).
Those standards also include a requirement for complete landscaping screen. As
such, the spruce trees should be no more than 12 feet on center to accomplish this
requirement. This would result in a total planting of 25 spruce trees, increased from
the 17 proposed. Because the office face of the buildings faces south, and keeps truck
operations to the truck court, the building will screen the truck activity, and potential
impacts are lessened with this design.
One note regarding the landscape materials - staff would suggest replacing River
Birch in the rear area with something more long-lived. Birch trees tend to fail much
earlier than other overstory trees.
Parking. Automobile parking is provided at an average of one space per 581 sf gross,
plus truck court temporary space for loading. This ratio should be more than
adequate for these buildings, which would do very limited retail customer traffic.
Siznaze. The applicant has planned for wall signage, but has not provided specific
drawings. Because only two of the planned eight buildings would face Dundas Road,
the front entry of each building would be considered to be the "front" for sign
purposes. At 15% of building fagade, each building would be allowed approximately
260 square feet of wall signage. The applicant should specify a common signage plan
(showing locations and sizes of allowable signs with the PUD) as a condition, to be
provided as part of Final PUD approval.
Buildin-a Desijzn/Materials. The applicant has proposed metal buildings for each of
the eight building in the project. A masonry, cultured stone, wainscot is shown on the
"front" (Dundas Road) side of the northernmost buildings, and the south entry side of
the southernmost buildings. The sides and truck -court "rear" of each building, as
3
City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017
well as the entry walls of the four middle buildings, show a metal wainscot with an
alternative color.
Lizhtinz. The applicant has planned for wall -mounted lighting, with a downcast
cover to avoid glare onto adjoining property. The photometric plan shows zero or 0.1
foot-candles readings at the west, north, and east property lines, and the southern
stormwater pond separates the lighting from the nearest residential property. Fixture
specification also meet code requirements.
Plat. The proposed plat includes a total of eight lots, each containing one building.
As noted previously, each of the lots will be served by a private drive that encircles
the project. Lot sizes range from just under 20,400 square feet to just over 32,000
square feet in area. Only lots I and 2 front on a public street (Dundas Road). The
two southernmost lots are the largest, and include the stormwater pond and buffer
plantings, an area of approximately 20,000 square feet between the two parcels.
The layout of the plat requires the creation of an association responsibility for
common maintenance of private property. Cross parking and access would be a
component of the covenants applicable under this PUD to ensure continued
accessibility and operation. The easements and declarations should be subject to
review and approval by the City Attorney.
Staff notes that there is a question regarding the south boundary line of the property.
A narrow strip of land abuts the property between the Oakwood Industrial Park
properties and the Klein Farms land to the south. Staff has asked the applicant to
verify the legal description of the proposal as a condition of plat approval. After
further research and discussion, the applicant has provided a revised preliminary plat
adjusting the southern boundary line to reflect the accurate boundary of the proposed
plat area. The revised plat reflects slightly reduced lot areas for Lots 7 and 8 given
the boundary line adjustment.
The City Engineer's comments relating to the civil components of the plat are
detailed in a separate letter. The City Engineer has made detailed comments relating
to the proposed stormwater management. The applicant will be required to provide
detailed information on maintenance of the system as part of a stormwater
maintenance agreement and within the cross easement and maintenance agreement
for the development.
To accommodate these and other requirements of the PUD, the applicant will be
required to execute a development agreement relating to PUD approvals, including an
incorporation of the phasing elements of the project.
Finally, the applicant will need to work with the City Building and Street departments
to arrange addressing and mailbox requirements for the project.
L!
City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing on the
requests on June 6th, 2017.
The Commission heard from the applicant's representatives regarding the need for
multi -tenant and multi -use buildings as proposed with the project. The Commission
also verified that a bufferyard standard would be required to be met on the south line;
staff noted the condition requiring an increased number of tree plantings along the
south line. Further, the Commission confirmed with the applicant that the buildings
facing Dundas Road and the south boundary will include the masonry wainscot, while
the buildings internal to the site will have a color differentiation in material, not the
masonry wainscot.
No members of the public provided comment during the public hearing.
After discussion, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend
approval of the development stage PUD and preliminary plat as proposed, with
conditions as noted in Exhibit Z.
The Commission also recommended approval of the rezoning to PUD, which Council
will be asked to consider with final stage PUD and final plat requests, to come at a
later date.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
The Planning Commission recommends Alternative 1 below for both Decisions.
Decision 1—Development Stage PUD approval.
1. Motion to approve the the proposed Development Stage PUD for the Spaeth
Industrial Park, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2017-012, and subject
to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the Staff report.
2. Motion to deny approval of the Development Stage PUD for the Spaeth Industrial
Park, based on findings to be made by the City Council.
3. Motion to table the resolution, subject to submission of additional information.
Decision 2 — Preliminary Plat approval for Spaeth Industrial Park.
1. Motion to approve the Preliminary Plat for Spaeth Industrial Park as revised and
dated, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2017-013, and subject to the
conditions of Exhibit Z of the Staff report.
5
City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017
2. Motion to deny approval of the preliminary plat for Spaeth Industrial Park, based
on findings to be made by the City Council.
3. Motion to table the resolution, subject to submission of additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the PUD and Preliminary Plat as submitted,
Alternative 1 for each of the two decisions. The proposed layout is designed to
provide an opportunity for small businesses to establish themselves in the Monticello
market by creating buildings that can be owned by individual businesses. Expanding
the market for such businesses is consistent with the intent of the Economic
Development objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. By designing the project
as proposed, the project is also consistent with the City's interest in protecting
residential neighborhoods from industrial intrusions.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Resolution PC -2017-012
B. Resolution PC -2017-013
C. Draft, Ordinance No. 6XX, Spaeth Industrial Park PUD (to be considered for
adoption with final plat and final stage PUD)
D. Aerial Site Image
E. Applicant Narrative
F. PUD Development Plans, including:
a. Project Location Plan, Title
b. Site Plan
c. Grading and Drainage Plan
d. Sanitary & Water Utility Plan
e. Landscape Plan
f. SWPPP
g. Existing Conditions and Removals Plan
h. Details
i. Phasing Plan
j. Elevations
k. Floor Plan
1. Photometrics
G. Preliminary Plat
H. Revised Preliminary Plat, dated June 13th, 2017
I. ALTA Survey
J. Fire Truck Circulation Plan
K. Fire Hydrant Coverage Plan
L. Stormwater Calculations, online only
M. City Engineer's Letter, dated May 31, 2017
Z. Conditions of Approval
G
City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017
EXHIBIT Z
Spaeth Industrial Park — PUD Zoning and Preliminary Plat
PID 155018003020
Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park
1. Research and revise the Plat and PUD plans as necessary based on the issues raised
by the south boundary line with Klein Farms Estates 2nd Addition.
2. As a part of the Final PUD application, provide a Sign Plan for the PUD consistent
with City code requirements.
3. Prepare a site circulation signage plan for entry, exiting, and pavement markings as
approved by the City Engineer.
4. Prepare cross -access and parking easements and maintenance covenants, and enter
into a development agreement with the City, meeting the requirements of the City
Attorney for maintenance and required improvements.
5. Update the circulation plan to show full truck turning movements consistent with the
comments in the staff report.
6. Verify internal trash handling equipment, and prohibit outdoor storage as a part of the
project PUD approvals.
7. Coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets
departments.
8. Increase south bufferyard planting as noted in the staff report.
9. Compliance with the terms and requirements of the City Engineer's report.
10. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission.
7
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-012
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REZONING TO "SPAETH INDUSTRIAL
PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT" AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK
WHEREAS, the applicant owns property along Dundas Road, PID No.
15501800302; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to rezone its property to PUD,
subdivide it into eight parcels, and develop it as a common industrial project; and
WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for
industrial uses; and
WHEREAS, the site is guided for industrial uses under the label "Places to Work" in
the City's Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, are consistent with
the long-term use and development of the property for industrial uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 2017 on the
application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to
present information to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the
staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following
Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval:
1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the existing and proposed
buildings to industrial use.
2. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD
are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as an industrial area.
3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including
sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to
serve the property for the development as proposed.
4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels without public street
frontage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development
objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-012
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
Monticello City Council approves the Rezoning and Development Stage PUD, subject to the
conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows:
1. Research and revise the Plat and PUD plans as necessary based on the issues raised
by the south boundary line with Klein Farms Estates 2nd Addition.
2. As a part of the Final PUD application, provide a Sign Plan for the PUD consistent
with City code requirements.
3. Prepare a site circulation signage plan for entry, exiting, and pavement markings as
approved by the City Engineer.
4. Prepare cross -access and parking easements and maintenance covenants, and enter
into a development agreement with the City, meeting the requirements of the City
Attorney for maintenance and required improvements.
5. Update the circulation plan to show full truck turning movements consistent with the
comments in the staff report.
6. Verify internal trash handling equipment, and prohibit outdoor storage as a part of the
project PUD approvals.
7. Coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets
departments.
8. Increase south bufferyard planting as noted in the staff report.
9. Compliance with the terms and requirements of the City Engineer's report.
10. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission.
ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
2
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-012
Brad Fyle, Chair
ATTEST:
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-013
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK
WHEREAS, the applicant owns property along Dundas Road, PID No.
15501800302;and
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to plat said property into eight
parcels, and develop it as a common industrial project under a PUD; and
WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for
industrial uses; and
WHEREAS, the site is guided for industrial uses under the label "Places to Work" in
the City's Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, are consistent with
the long-term use and development of the property for industrial uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 2017 on the
application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to
present information to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the
staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following
Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval:
1. The Plat provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the existing and proposed
buildings to industrial use.
2. The proposed improvements on the site under the Preliminary Plat are
consistent with the needs of the development in this location as an industrial
area.
3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including
sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to
serve the property for the development as proposed.
4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels without public street
frontage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development
objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-013
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
Monticello City Council approves the Preliminary Plat for Spaeth Industrial Park, subject to
the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report as follows:
1. Research and revise the Plat and PUD plans as necessary based on the issues raised
by the south boundary line with Klein Farms Estates 2nd Addition.
2. As a part of the Final PUD application, provide a Sign Plan for the PUD consistent
with City code requirements.
3. Prepare a site circulation signage plan for entry, exiting, and pavement markings as
approved by the City Engineer.
4. Prepare cross -access and parking easements and maintenance covenants, and enter
into a development agreement with the City, meeting the requirements of the City
Attorney for maintenance and required improvements.
5. Update the circulation plan to show full truck turning movements consistent with the
comments in the staff report.
6. Verify internal trash handling equipment, and prohibit outdoor storage as a part of the
project PUD approvals.
7. Coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets
departments.
8. Increase south bufferyard planting as noted in the staff report.
9. Compliance with the terms and requirements of the City Engineer's report.
10. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission.
ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
2
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-013
Brad Fyle, Chair
ATTEST:
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
ORDINANCE NO.6XX
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE,
KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE SPAETH
INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF
MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM I-2,
HEAVY DISTRICT TO SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD, PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT:
LOT 2 BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 2.4(0) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is
hereby amended by adding the following:
(XX) Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District
(a) Purpose. The purpose of the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District is to
provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the
District for industrial land uses.
(b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Spaeth Industrial Park
PUD District shall be indoor industrial uses as found in the I-2, Heavy
Industrial District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the
approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and
development agreement dated , 2017, as may be amended. The
introduction of any other use from any district, including Conditional
Uses in the I-2 District, shall be reviewed under the requirements of
the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned
Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage
PUD..
(c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory
and incidental to industrial uses, and as specifically identified by the
approved final stage PUD plans, but shall not include outdoor storage
or other activities.
(d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the
development of any lot in the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District
shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development
agreement. In such case where any proposed improvement or use is
not addressed by the Final Stage PUD, then the regulations of the I-2,
ORDINANCE NO.6XX
Heavy Industrial District shall apply.
(e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner
of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or
coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an
amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance, Section 2.4 (0)(10). The City may require that substantial
changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new
project, including a zoning district amendment.
Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amendment to rezoned the
following described parcels from I-2, Heavy Industrial District to Spaeth
Industrial Park PUD, Planned Unit Development District:
Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park Addition to Monticello (subject to the
replat as Lots 1-8, Block 1, Spaeth Industrial Park).
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this
ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time.
Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance
as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to
renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended
effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary
corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process,
provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance
as has been adopted.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage
and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the
City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are
available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request.
ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2017.
ATTEST:
Jeff O'Neill, Administrator
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
2
ORDINANCE NO.6XX
AYES:
NAYS:
Spaeth, Ken - Request for Rezoning to PUD, Development Stage PUD, & Preliminary Plat created by: city of Monticello
Lot 2, Block 3 Oakwood Industrial Park 1155-018-003020 1 107 Dundas Road
f %
2401 15506000,1030 —1,5
5060001'040
1.55018DD2120 ° ' 1..550.1800211 D
1 '5060001020
1.55060001050
5506000.1010
DUN D
1
155018 -
;1'S523000001'0�,..
M
550 20 1155018003,0030
LU
t
I Cp:r-:�1 '' A
"MR 30L�EN EAGLE Lir--,.... .._ f •i , T •+ yr
lJt m. arca ! 3 1
J
LU
D ��
-j
Q� 'm�^551:330165
LV Z 1~ !r
Z f m 1F l:
155098000030 p C EARMSTEADsDR
7-F 415518800100101
� r
+ 15509300002
• t
At .11
Ken Spaeth Masonry
108 Meadowlark Rd. Se.
St. Michael, MN 56557
612-889-3100 05-05-2017
City of Monticello
The purpose of the project is to provide individuals or small companies with a
land option where they can own or lease a building that makes it affordable for
their business. The project would have small lots that will allow them to construct
a 4,000-6000 sq. ft. building. The goal is to provide a cost-effective option that
they can have ownership while keeping their payments to 3-4000.00 per month.
The clients are anticipated to be small businesses that need an office and
warehouse. Could be construction related or small business. There is a very
strong need for this in the Monticello area without any current options. There are
not many comparables for this type project. Pfeifer property management in
Buffalo has something similar and it is full. The difference is that his buildings
are only available for lease. He does not offer the option of a lot sale. His
tenants are plumbers, electricians, computer I.T. and other small business
owners.
A PUD is required, for the subject property, because the project will have a
private street vs. a public street. The requirements for public street would use up
too much of the property. Also, a city street is more expensive and the goal is to
keep the project affordable. The project will be governed by an association
agreement that lease tenants and properties that are owner occupied will have to
abide by.
The concept is to not have a semi -truck park, but the site is designed to
accommodate limited truck traffic. We don't anticipate any loading docks. The
buildings will be post -frame buildings with 2 -tone metal cladding. Any building
sides facing Dundas street will have a brick or stone wainscoat up 3-4 ft.
We will bring sewer and water in from Dundas with individual meters for each
tenant. Storm water will be handled on site.
We realize that there are townhomes to the south of the project. We have a very
extensive landscape plan for this area with a berm and trees. We will also have a
chain link fence across the back of the property. Around the buildings we'll have
a 3 ft. wide area for landscape rock and on the street side have shrubs. All grass
areas will be sodded. All landscaped areas will be irrigated.
I expect the project could take 3-4 years to complete. My goal is to own 2-3
buildings myself and sell the remaining lots to owner occupied users. My intent is
to provide a small business park that both the city of Monticello and myself can
be proud of. Thanks for your time.
Ken Spaeth
\KITTSON ROSEAU
1
South Haven
Southsldel
r_
—L1n
MARSHALL
PENNINGTON
RED LAKE r
LAKE OF
HEODS
KOOCHICHING
BELTRAM
f0XKITASGA
CASS
BECKER
NORMAN
MANN-
IOMEN
, ,,,,,
�
CLAY
SWIFT
CASS
BECKER
PARLE
N
y
, ,,,,,
�
AITI{IN
�o
CRQYY__
WING
OTTER TAIL
I- TODD
4RAN Tb01J-aLA-L=
NILL.E
%19
MOR RI SON 1 Cs
ENT 4N -
f� POPE
�
ST EARNS
�y
O
11R ISANTI
-
SWIFT
0 A
LO WRIG
LAC HIPPEWA� *r4�`� HENN
QUI
PARLE
N
y
, ,,,,,
ARVER
RENVILLE rA.
CARLTON
PINE
F
RAMSEY
WASHINGTON
I SIEILEY OOt>HLIE
LYON LE EDW..
(COLLET UELIR RIDE
BROWN
F
10L,MIIRRgY `WOOD "T".EARTH`��rOa
5` 4s O
RQClr�OBLES
* MARTIN F MOWER
P ° lite
V
MINNESOTA
C.Iea
orinna 1
I � �
IAiddle-ville-Tw
.ac
Hovra rd; La ke
1717'
aarwater
Creek Tvrp
WINO
NlnntiC2llUTwp
IaapleLakle Tvrp
eke
Buffialc Twp
5t. Mich
atham Tvrp_C-Buffalo
rd Twp
■ paianal
Franklin Turps
* �.
WRIGHT COUNTY
SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
w
�,c
Cn r.,
"Q M
o kn
c
ct
O N
ct
a
o v�
V
�z
Cng
CL
Zi
W 0
Ld
� U
O
W
U
O
ct
CL
CL
z
0
N
O
DOQ
W
Q
�
v
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
0
o
a
v
CO
PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
FILE
NO.
00640
C1
SITE PLAN
C2
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3
SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4
STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5
LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
co
C7
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8
DETAILS
C9
PHASING PLAN
Proiect
Location
Plan
I
I
ROADDUNDASI
I
I i i I
u 15" R. C.P. ► ► ► ► ► ► i Q; ► ►
o �; ► ► a; ► ► ► 11,0 ► i ; cl: ` SAN MH
00
RIM ELEV.=960.04
SAN MH' BUILDING �- �' 11 1p INV. ELEV.=942.8
RIM ELEV.=961.96 SETBACK LINE `° + + +
INV. ELEV.=943.7
1 + + + + 30' FRONT 00' 0" E Plat) + +
+ + + + „ �' \+ + o 4 o
�1 + + +' �> N 88°3 53 E a ` '
h 1+ + +; s 14--T-`V- TFL RISER _
�, T T-• T- l C -T T T T 1 -T __ T T T T T T T 20.01- �- L.
�3� ► 20 14 1 - 300. 0-- . - - -
14 Y ?--6.0+ + f _ _ I___r__T__T_ t __T+ f _ {�J +-+
\ �+ FLS+ - + + + + + + + \+ + + rn + + + ... + + + + + + + + + + 1+ + + + + + + +1
1 + + ++ + + + + + + + + +o �" + + + + + + + 1 + + 4 +' + + + + + + 1
1+ + + i~ + + + + + 9 `+ + + + + + + + + + + + 9 + + + + + + + + �?' + + p + +I
13 l + + + + + O + + 4 + + '+_I T)o + + + + + + + r + + + + + + _-J 7 + + + �+ +o+ + �'� + + ,
+ +o + + +�+ + + + + + E,1E 1T+ +- T + �. + + + +0+ + , + +l+ ,
i, \+ + -+ + +►-9.0 --r j +� + +I . + + + \+ + + �+++ ++r0i
+ + o + +� + + + + + + + + + +
;+ I 5 ` + + +1N + + + + + + + 5 3 6 + + OII �; + +1 O
w 1 + I +tr IN,�I + +I _ ren = -- _ _ �f s- -� _ +
CD
+ Y + �1. - -ter -�. �= 18- _ -- �,. _ Il I _b w. �a �� �{ + + 1
Q 'r+_
+ II + + + (n
BUILDING ;+++1 ++� j 1 109 109 j a +++I+++ BUILDING
SETBACK LINE � I+�+++ I o �' + +I +'
•�+I + � I � +++� SETBACK LINE
15 EXISTING +++++'� I �`+++I++ ' 15 EXISTING
INTERIOR SIDE *++I+++� I I �;+++I++ INTERIOR SIDE
++1+++ BUILDING A
5.0 BUILDING B
t + +1+ + + I 6, 9 76 SF 5.0-- 6,9 76 SF j + + +
o I+ +� I LOT 2 I �I+++�+++;
++++ LOT 1 -20.0
t++µ++ 23, 094 SF '+ + ,+ +
23,100 SF + 1+ +1
�-+20.0 0.53 AC 0.53 AC -'o•I +36.0----T-,-
N, '
\ ;,-6.0+ o °-0-0-0-0-o-0'"O•-o'og000 + + +
\ I+ = 10.0 t„ ,� a v-o-o-o-O-O-o"o"o"'0o o 0 0 0 o o O o 0_0_0_0 _ Im.
\ I A v v u -O -O -O -O -O -O -O O-Oma¢°O°O�O°O°O°O 0`00 0�0�00000,•O O O O O O O_O_O_O_t` -'�� �+ I +;•
u O -O -O -O -O -O -O -OHO -O O O O,.O O,.,O..O,.O.. O..O O_ O O 1�c'TI�+ I'
�r�36.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 n r T T + ++ +��+ + + + + + + + + + + t + + I
13 �; I+ �� + + + + + + + + +�+ + + + I+ +I + + + + + + + + + + +�++ o * +I=
;+ + 0+--�-�- + + + + + + + + +o +a+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 + + + + + + + +; m 13
1 +I+ +�'r + + + 2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I
,+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + o+ + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + ... + + + + + + +1
I j + + + + + + + T + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + f
1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +11 = 14 d
1 •, + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +' + + + + . + + + + + 1 . , T T T + + + + + F
I'
d
:+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I
14 T I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +' + + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I+ r
I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +1
+1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++
+ + + + + + + + + 4
I+ + + + + + + +T4" + + + + + + + o+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ 2 + + + + + + + + +, + + + + + + + + + + + + +r+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + 0 ++ + + + + + ++ + + + + + + 0' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + +� + +
+ +1p + + + + + + + + + + + + + +-+ T I + + __.__., + - + -+ + �F - F --4 - --+ + + + + f + I+
+ + ,d' + + --fi --r-- r -T - + �- + + + + + + I+ v ° 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0"0 0 -
O v o"o I -o!- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°0°0°0°0°0°0°0°o°o9n°O „o 0 0 0 0.0.0.0.0 v� ++I++ I+v o 0 0-0-0-0 0 0 0 0 0,^0 D o g 0 0 0 0 0 ��'" + + +
+y,+ vOOvOOn 0�0o^o_^o_;0D0Dogogogogogo o O O O O O_ O _ Il O 1� f I + +
MOW --- I 1 + + + • LOT 4 1 LF + {}VIII+ +
+ + LOT 3 j 1+ I +
LINE I + +++g I 20,390 SF IF+++I+++ �_--MOW
++++++� j 20 400 SF
+1 + 0.47 AC 0.47 AC I III + +I + 1 I LINE
+++ �+++
++I+++� I BUILDING C --5•o BUILDING D++++++
I i I �}• F I �I I I I
+++I+++ 5.0-- 6, 976 SF I+++1+++
I ++I+++ 6,976 SF
+
' �+ + +
11 ,+ +I� I
I
*+� C�C.1�7 F_NCE i + 2 .6.
0}
4++ C�*, Ej +\- 0 109 9�9 ,+-.- +I + ;
+``-35.9 Q
+ + n �E 109 - I �+ +
36.0 d '• T' I l• .
+ +
+I I .. �/� C A _ _' i _* - - - s,c 87
r .rte 7\\\D
- - - - ---- - I + '!l, - 1 +�+-20.0--h I �„ _ _._ _ ,- - - � - - 7 + +t , +"� + + + + + + + I' I ' + l +I41 ;+ + I; I �+ + + + ( 8 )r +� + + 3 0 0 + + +;++++++ 3 23 T +p1 + +ry� '� 00 1 + + II ' t + + i 6 + + + ,+ + + + + + + +5 + T r + + + I
CC) 0 I+ + I I VD+ + '' r + + + + + +1 + + + + + + + + + I + + + + +1 I
C) ^ rn 1 + \� + + + , + + + + + + + + + ± + _ + + + ,-T + �p + 1 '\
O I+ + 00+++ +,Q3f-t++++ - 7 - - -+ ; +T+T+T--�-�N ++- ++ + 1 +++++++. 7 +++++++ g +++ �5+++++++ O ++I
-(+ + + +'� + + + + 9 +1+ + + + ++o+ + + + + -+ + + + IT I, 14 d a
14 I 1 T T + + + + + + + + + i + + + + T + + 9 + + + + + + + + + + o + 4 o•+ 1 + ;h I �c
° , I ' 9 N 7 II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Gp�
+ 1��+ + + ^� + + + + + + + + 7 + + + o��T_-;---r- +-+--- + + + + + + + '�.� + + w"-----CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\-
1 + + '� + + + +I + +{�� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �; 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
1++ ++++ 1 >, + +++ + 5 + +9k.0 +o ++ ++ + ++ ++ 5 6 + ++ +++ +++ +23 I+ +++I++ Ii
�- I 3 + 12
I+ + + 4 I ; 1 + 3 + 6 + + F + + + 8 + F + + 11 III + + +1 o~ 2 �3
+ + \ 8 + + +o o + + + + \ r-�l 11 + I+ 1;
12++I+++ I +�n - r _.�+.._+ - zYl��_i�•=e�r ----r�F'"t 'r_ 7- - - +++++
-� q
1 + I+ + 1 c } ' I II + O
iF + + I '- - 11 + + + O f1 _
+ + + 109 II + 1+I c}-
+1+ I 109 v, ;111+ +1+11 �o
CHAINLINK --- ++1+++ o ; +++++ ; o � 00 N o
FENCE + \- 1 + + + i ;I + I+ I O o
}
+1+A 11 + + +•-
ON LOT LINE. 1+ + , �}
+ + + I it + + +-111 O , Q O
++1+++ 1 BUILDING E ��--5.o BUILDING F ' + +1 + ;; COII O
0 + + + j 6, 9 76 SF 5.0- 6,976 SF ';I + + + + +;;
k++A LOT 6 III+ +11
1++ i LOT 5 ;II+++11
+ t + 20.0
1 + + +� 20,384 SF ' 1++6.0
1 I 20, 400 SF
;�20 0 �� I 0.47 AC 9i 1 -35.9-++ '1' �___5.1 + \-
i 0.47 AC
+ _ v v u O O O O O O O O O O��+ } + I I 0
n6.0 0.0 ° ° o ° o ° o o' o o ° o ° _0.0.0.0_ _ I '
+ u-o-O'O-O"O- "O"no+-�OO,-O°O '00oO�O�O�Oo000r,0 O O O O�,O O OoT ^ +t + •�+ ,C� + +Ovou°uOo_O-O_O_o_o�o_o"o"o�O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8n 0 S-/7-+-36.0 + + + i+ +; + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + dp + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + +� - L + +-_.-�,-__i- + + T �-�-- + + �r ++ o+++�___++-+---P� -� + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + T + T + . + + + + + + 1fi1
1+ + +�+ ++++++' 2'+++++++++++++++ + + o + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +1i
1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + T + + + + - + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + ,�
1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1++ii d
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +14
1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ... + + . 1 T T T + + + + + + + +l+l+ ... +'ISI
d 14 I + I i - - - - . , , T T T + + + + +I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I+
r'l+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +11
++,+++++++++++++++ + + + a 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + BUILDING
IF+ ++++++++++++++++++++++ T +++++++0+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 ++++++++++++++ ++'i
BUILDING : ++++++++ 2 ++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++ ++++++�.+ SETBACK LINE
SETBACK LINE + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ��_�_-+- + I+
µ + + d' + + + + + + + + +___+__�__ +- r-- F +- -� + + + + + + + + + + + �� + + + o '
1+ +o+ + + + + + + + + + + + 4 ° ° ° °-o-°- °�0�0 6°0 °o°o°o°o° 1 15 EXISTING
u o 0 0 0 0 00 00;0,0° °0000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-0.o_o_r 0 0+ ++ +;
15 EXISTING +I + + °000 °o °o °o°°°°°°°°°°o_o_o_� _ + +II
1 + + �'-°-° ^ " + + +�; INTERIOR SIDE
INTERIOR SIDE ++ j LOT 7 LOT 8'+ + +*i o
+ + + I b 32,145 SF + 1
t 1 j 32,000 SF++ +�I
I+ + '' 0.73 AC 0.74 AC
t +1 + +; j ��#+ , + II
}++ ++ BUILDING G --5.o BUILDING H++++++
+ + +}' j 6 9 76 SF 5.0-- F 6,9 76 SF '�.+ + I + 1? --5.2 + \-
I + + + 1 I (O ' .y+++ ++n
+ 1 + +11 r II
I I !
CHAINLINK --� :++ ++++ ++
FENCE + I + + >, ,� + +I
\ ++Al i 1 +++1..
0.5 FT. WEST 1++ +++1 I o 109 �� .g', ++t ++: o
OF LOT LINE. 1
++
+t+�1o•0 109 n 9 3+5 8
'++-36.0+' a + 1 I a _ +1'
-+_ 20.0-- I _ _ ' � • �� � � •--_ -, -�` � • '~=='r -'I i- -�� �-�r-r�i�a`=# \�\ �- + + + + + 3i j � 20j o +
I+-`r--"-'�- - -+ + ATF + + �+ + + + + + + \ x + + + + I
1+ + W. I II I �~ + \\ + + N +c„+ + I' + + + + + + + + + 3 + n� ++++++I
1 + , + + s< I II, Imo/ + + 3 0 0 + +1 + + + + + + \ 6 +�%'+� 1 i + -6.0
{--6.0 + +`4 I; 1O 6 0 + + j + + + + + + + , 5 + + + ; °
I + I + + '�, I + 5 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �.�,,.,�'� + + +
+ + + 0 aim + + 1+ + + + + + + + +11 + + + + + + + + + + + + + O + + 0 + +
L 4 +
^�° - \1 o LANDSCAPE
°oo ---EDGING/MULCH
C4-------------------------- -
I ;
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
;� .-- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
STORM WATER a) 1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
MANAGEMENT BASIN o 1 '
��A I o ,--- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER---\ �I-TY-_,� - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - _ _ - - - I - 1 °14'00" E
N 89 °14'00" E - ~� - - ------
-
' �------- ' �--�-----------------------------„-----------------.-------- --- I ----1899.53------
------3123.56-----
------------------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - ----`-------- - �- Po" 70 o a: C1 ------ -- °o � \
0 MOW i ;°o° 000do°o°� '- SHE `� 66
I _A �� meq. ��, a 3( 0n13
2 Pl t)
LINE ❑ 15
15 13' cP = 13 - 13 S, 45 13 13 CURB 13 13 13LANDSCAPE
13 �° 13,STOP
(N 89 ti, 1 1 W Plat 1 RISER EDGING/MULCH
LANDSCAPE -= ' - CB
GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
EDGING/ROCK BUILDING - ELEV.=958.16- - -SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL
& SHRUBS SETBACK LINE PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS
15' REAR %� I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470)
A A H I� _T_ A I_T_ F__ A F_'� Fri I_T_ I N i I i I
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SWj AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
LEGEND:
SITE PLAN NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF SIDEWALK OR
EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, RAMPS, CONCRETE APRONS
AND STOOPS.
2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO PATCHING.
MATCH EXISTING GRADES.
3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARATED
WITH A 2" EXPANSION JOINT.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE
LIGHTING, COMMUNICATION, SPRINKLER, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO
PAVING.
5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO
BUILDING ENTRANCE (SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). POLE MOUNT
APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL
OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL.
6. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND MNDOT
STANDARDS INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING METAL
TRUNCATED DOME PANELS.
7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE MARSHAL
FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES, CURB MARKING AND SIGNAGE IF NEEDED.
8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL
EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW WORK AS SHOWN.
9. ALL NEW UTILITIES MUST BE UNDERGROUND. COORDINATE LOCATIONS
WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES.
10.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CROSS SLOPE OF
1.5% WITH ADJUSTMENT +/- 0.5%. SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSPECTED
AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ANY SIDEWALK EXCEEDING 2.0% CROSS SLOPE
WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL
REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION
OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THOROUGHLY
REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITIES.
2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL
GOVERNING AUTHORITY. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH
THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE
OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE
ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS.
3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL
UNDERGROUND PIPING, VALVING, ETC.
4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL
SOFT, YIELDING OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE
MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COMPACTION REPORT
PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE
THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE
AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN
THE SOILS REPORT.
5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE
BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE
THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES
TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL
COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR
TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK FORCE.
6. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD
VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL
NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES.
NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK
HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON
THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN.
0 30 60 90
r �
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
SITE DATA:
EXISTING ZONING: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING PID: 155-018-003020
EXISTING LOT AREA:
LOT 1 1 : 191,832 SF = 4.40 ACRES
PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: �e
64109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.27. CL U
W
0013NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES
J N
O CO W
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% Q wo co Q
Nam. 03 to DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES x L Wi cncc cn
Z Wz
PARKING DATA: Co W z g
REQUIRED PARKING STALLS:� ', 1 C O O CL CL
OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES > > � W
WAREHOUSE @ 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES O 0 W
Total = 53 SPACES Q
z c ORION
PROVIDED PARKING STALLS: "waft 1•+
Q.
Q � I
9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES) T O Q
waft
11i CL 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Lu
INOOR
LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING Lu Nam
^^
''
v,
FRONT EXISTING 30 6 Q
STREET SIDE EXISTING 30 6
INTERIOR SIDE EXISTING 15 6
INTERIOR SIDE PROPOSED 0 0
REAR YARD EXISTING 15 6
a
00
o �
KEY NOTES:° °_
a4i 'y � r� V'
N cNo N
O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT; SEE SECTION ON DETAIL SHEET ° I , o E
LO
W d v
O CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY, WIDTH VARIES. 6" CONCRETE co
o Z � � I o
W/6 X6 ##10/10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 12 O.C.) OVER 4 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE ,� W o
BASE. MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o C' A I , o o n'°'
MANUAL PLACEMENT. yEio W m
OCONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY, ° o o U
3 MIN. 5 FT WIDTH. 4" CONCRETE o C` � w°
W 6"X6"-#10 10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 6' O.C.). SEE SECTION ON SHEET C4.0. a C `� I o c:
MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A (CONST.
PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o oU I -,
MANUAL PLACEMENT, INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS AN ° � a, �,
ACCEPTABLE OPTION. _ :3E ;, - \ n 0 '
OD412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER �'` o v �
MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) c � O m
MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) v oa o o
O D612 CONCRETE CURB WITH TIP -OUT GUTTER 4 o
MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) r e o �, o° �
MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT MnDOT 2461 3
NOT APPLICABLE WHEN INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH HICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS
TO BE CONSTRUCTED.
PED. RAMP - IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & MnDOT
O6 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING
DEVICES. DEPRESS BACK OF CURB AT RAMP.
O PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSABILITY WITH WHITE LATEX PAINT.
OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MnDOT NOS, R7 -8A & R7-813). CENTER SIGN ON
O PARKING STALL. LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOUNT ON STEEL
CHANNEL POST.
O PAINT 4" SOLID STRIPE - WHITE LATEX PAINT,
10 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN.
O11 EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED. RESTORE GRADES TO
MATCH EXISTING ROADSIDE DITCH.
12 EXISTING ADJACENT OWNERS FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE.
13 EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES/SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE.
14 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN ON STEEL CHANNEL POST
a STOP
b DO NOT ENTER O
c DO NOT EXIT
d ONE WAY (WITH LEFT ARROW)
15 FENCE, CHAINLINK, 6.0 FT HEIGHT, INSTALL AT 1.0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE
V)
00
0
o m W
0 a v
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
C1 SITE PLAN
C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8 DETAILS
C9 PHASING PLAN
FILE NO. 00633
C1
Site Plan
EXISTING BOUNDARY
BUILDING SETBACK
LINE
- - - --
PROPOSED
LOT LINE
PROPOSED
FENCE
------------------------------
PROPOSED
CURB AND GUTTER
PROPOSED
CURB AND GUTTER TIP -OUT FLOWLINE
®
PROPOSED
PARKING STALLS
•::;•::;•::;•:::•::;•::;•:::•:::•:::•:::•::;I
PROPOSED
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
° o o ° ° o o ° ° o ° ° ° °
00000000000000000000000000000;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0j
PROPOSED
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT°o°oo°°oo°°o°°°
- r �� s ''a•
PROPOSED
LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
SITE PLAN NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF SIDEWALK OR
EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, RAMPS, CONCRETE APRONS
AND STOOPS.
2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO PATCHING.
MATCH EXISTING GRADES.
3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARATED
WITH A 2" EXPANSION JOINT.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE
LIGHTING, COMMUNICATION, SPRINKLER, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO
PAVING.
5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO
BUILDING ENTRANCE (SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). POLE MOUNT
APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL
OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL.
6. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND MNDOT
STANDARDS INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING METAL
TRUNCATED DOME PANELS.
7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE MARSHAL
FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES, CURB MARKING AND SIGNAGE IF NEEDED.
8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL
EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW WORK AS SHOWN.
9. ALL NEW UTILITIES MUST BE UNDERGROUND. COORDINATE LOCATIONS
WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES.
10.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CROSS SLOPE OF
1.5% WITH ADJUSTMENT +/- 0.5%. SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSPECTED
AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ANY SIDEWALK EXCEEDING 2.0% CROSS SLOPE
WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL
REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION
OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THOROUGHLY
REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITIES.
2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL
GOVERNING AUTHORITY. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH
THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE
OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE
ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS.
3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL
UNDERGROUND PIPING, VALVING, ETC.
4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL
SOFT, YIELDING OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE
MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COMPACTION REPORT
PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE
THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE
AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN
THE SOILS REPORT.
5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE
BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE
THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES
TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL
COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR
TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK FORCE.
6. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD
VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL
NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES.
NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK
HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON
THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN.
0 30 60 90
r �
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
SITE DATA:
EXISTING ZONING: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING PID: 155-018-003020
EXISTING LOT AREA:
LOT 1 1 : 191,832 SF = 4.40 ACRES
PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: �e
64109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.27. CL U
W
0013NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES
J N
O CO W
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% Q wo co Q
Nam. 03 to DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES x L Wi cncc cn
Z Wz
PARKING DATA: Co W z g
REQUIRED PARKING STALLS:� ', 1 C O O CL CL
OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES > > � W
WAREHOUSE @ 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES O 0 W
Total = 53 SPACES Q
z c ORION
PROVIDED PARKING STALLS: "waft 1•+
Q.
Q � I
9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES) T O Q
waft
11i CL 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Lu
INOOR
LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING Lu Nam
^^
''
v,
FRONT EXISTING 30 6 Q
STREET SIDE EXISTING 30 6
INTERIOR SIDE EXISTING 15 6
INTERIOR SIDE PROPOSED 0 0
REAR YARD EXISTING 15 6
a
00
o �
KEY NOTES:° °_
a4i 'y � r� V'
N cNo N
O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT; SEE SECTION ON DETAIL SHEET ° I , o E
LO
W d v
O CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY, WIDTH VARIES. 6" CONCRETE co
o Z � � I o
W/6 X6 ##10/10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 12 O.C.) OVER 4 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE ,� W o
BASE. MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o C' A I , o o n'°'
MANUAL PLACEMENT. yEio W m
OCONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY, ° o o U
3 MIN. 5 FT WIDTH. 4" CONCRETE o C` � w°
W 6"X6"-#10 10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 6' O.C.). SEE SECTION ON SHEET C4.0. a C `� I o c:
MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A (CONST.
PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o oU I -,
MANUAL PLACEMENT, INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS AN ° � a, �,
ACCEPTABLE OPTION. _ :3E ;, - \ n 0 '
OD412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER �'` o v �
MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) c � O m
MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) v oa o o
O D612 CONCRETE CURB WITH TIP -OUT GUTTER 4 o
MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) r e o �, o° �
MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT MnDOT 2461 3
NOT APPLICABLE WHEN INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH HICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS
TO BE CONSTRUCTED.
PED. RAMP - IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & MnDOT
O6 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING
DEVICES. DEPRESS BACK OF CURB AT RAMP.
O PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSABILITY WITH WHITE LATEX PAINT.
OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MnDOT NOS, R7 -8A & R7-813). CENTER SIGN ON
O PARKING STALL. LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOUNT ON STEEL
CHANNEL POST.
O PAINT 4" SOLID STRIPE - WHITE LATEX PAINT,
10 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN.
O11 EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED. RESTORE GRADES TO
MATCH EXISTING ROADSIDE DITCH.
12 EXISTING ADJACENT OWNERS FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE.
13 EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES/SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE.
14 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN ON STEEL CHANNEL POST
a STOP
b DO NOT ENTER O
c DO NOT EXIT
d ONE WAY (WITH LEFT ARROW)
15 FENCE, CHAINLINK, 6.0 FT HEIGHT, INSTALL AT 1.0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE
V)
00
0
o m W
0 a v
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
C1 SITE PLAN
C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8 DETAILS
C9 PHASING PLAN
FILE NO. 00633
C1
Site Plan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
DUNDAS ���� ROAD
Y
---- 10" D.I.P. ,
I � O
- 15" R.C.P. � _
vi 00
1
mllilllhlop � � �i ► �� � � FES-D-�,g6g' AFEShl HC )4 I
j SAN Mh' FES -F 1 ; ' I Ch1' o _ 'c� `960 IE=958.80 960.0' 959.9 IN 3 i
IE=958.60
``� FES -E 63 �P 5o )(,, )1 i
RIM ELE IE=960.00 c�'`' I 96 1 QAn 56„ ^ `� �� - --- �-��P-960-� QliQ 7Q
INV. ELLv.=y�-u.i , °0 1�• i0m, �� IE=959.70 - CB -8 � 960 r '� _ r7 '� � �'_ _ FES -A I
°- - � �o_ _ -� RE=961.10 0 0 00 E Plat) c - _ _ ° � 9�9»-� �_ _ IE=958.70
1 �.-959.7. 959.2X IE=957.00 _88 6 53 E X ) I - - _ (X 959.3 T RISER
X � ►- l - T T - -�- -T �9� 960 T_ ` - �'
960.6 T --_ - - - -
I6'`!�'___�I --- -3DD. D-� �3 �„ x` 1961960 o' - -
- ' - 1_-- - --- >Q7
r � -yb `��- �-' 962 1`1 CB-9moi3�� ii��� - - --�'-�»._-»_-____'----" Q�__V1
�
9 - _ --_ rn--- �b1.5 0 SII CB -1
RE=961.20 ; g cP -- - '% 1 X`?-' oa,--' - -----=�b �' ° �' I
1- ei---- ery `b.4 �o �� 1 i1 \ RE=961.20
I E= 95 7.00 1 . ,
}- 9 I i IE=957.00 IN
/ 1 I- r N 962 °ti►� , o�� ge°ti _ _ -� > IE=959.00 OUT
I IP 6 ? 9
I I�'9ah�`EASE}aPN lis 2
_- -- z.s% X963.0
x 962.9 ,_ I X 963. _ i o I
962.8X Q y i e 01 '1 \ 19 ' 9631 - 1- \ �,? I 1 0'621 I
n.2 0'
�� 'SSS^"-- ��- ; SII
N 16 lL I lO \ --- -
w I 1 --- I -'�' -------------------------- -- 1963 ------- ---- - - II
�• Q, IT d°--------------------- 963 _ ------ CE
ct
\ i =
Iii I - •'1 , �
109 109
II
'I • I ��i I 11-'- I
lil
Ig _; 9 2 _ _ ® 2.a% i I
• _ _ I \
C) i 2.0% I i X962.2 _---------- - 962-A 1 I\ x963.5
w +i • �ti ► i ��' BUILDING B `� I '
BUILDING A g62 X61.9 11
\� X 9 P.,2 ;5 i 6 9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I I I I I \
963.1 X\ o i i I I1, j CB -16- I \\ , / X 964.2
RE=962.50
FFE=963.50 \
FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 vI `\' X'9 0
\\ 11 1 X 961.9 - ` / °° \� \ 6�3 j�
ee� III 1 962.0 i CD
, � 0'"0'''0"0"0 � - I � N
I � \ �� � V V o-O-O'O"O"O_O_A c• ,
i V o 0 0 0 0 o�o' o' o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o Ab I
V u o -o -o-
u '''� 0 0 0 0 0�0
1 M OAO O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I \ 1
__LI E
I �j O
a,
963.7 X - 6� - . - . =�. - . - . - - ° +^ �� g I CB -2 963.7
96 .5X r -.-I. .- 9 '' I o
•ge? ti �, z.,% e' -o i, = RE=961.60
CB -1 1 d__ j� 's I ?.� � � ,.7% dee' ,.�% I al (I cn IE=957.00 \ \
RE=961.60 1 ?�� / IPS
�, \ 1 \ \
IE= 95 7.00 I I I ° g6�
_ _ ----
�--f------- 1 Q
rn• t?\ °� X 9•V I-' =------- CB- 1 0------- ; ; u O -a -A- A.'A.'A"O�'A(yOV AVOo00n00^00^00000000"00-y
v o-o�o-�-o"'o"o"o"o"o"o"o"0 0 0 0 oqo 0 0 0 o A o o
I I X i "� o,o00000000000���° ° °o�° RE=961.90 °!F°° °��_°.a_°_A-A �° 3.0.
i 1 ge i 960.9 1 I IX IX 96
MOW -__ ? \ IE=957.00 I 9 s��
LINE ' 3.0% ' '
1 I 1 II 1-_ -MOW1 I I 1
CO I 1 I I X 961._ �IX961.0 X' 1. \ LINE I
',naon aP �i i� 1 I I
i 1 I �v BUILDING D `�
BUILDING C 6 976 SF �a62.0�611' X 960.6 1 I X x 963.9
964.5X I I 1 11bM, I; I CO 6, 9 76 SF ,; ey � X 9610. I 96,
� CB-17I°,°I I n 1 I II `38
RE=962.50
FFE-963.50 1 1
WO F17NCE FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 - Q / 1
-- , X 1 1
964I� 1 °j i COf9F + \- 109 II - °'
-9 ' ON I -IJ �1l LINE
\I I ^9 2. �0� i vc�a, 109 ? X9Fl.5 / a � I III o I II Ii I 6
I --- --' ------------- -� ti:.yr:963.__ G - 4_--------- ----- 1 ;I I 1 ' � I 1X°�
-----------
-------------------------. me? 96, i,ecA 6 o X95.61 \ I X 963.8
e?fir---- ---- 1\ ; I ° 2.s 1 I c\.o I I
I
I_
157
o 11 • ! `'ge d'' 9 62 --- ----- ---- - -1- - - - \ °®rl+- - `96`? _ i I i CE -3
I
n' M _p 2.7% °dry 962 2.7% ?O �b ' - � X RE= 9 61.10 � 96�
CB- 13�- �ii�.�7�62.31 °�' i 2.7%_ Qdf ?;:% - I o \ IE=957.00 -I X 963.8
RE=961.10 - i# I
IE=957.00 ° i I g I g62 �' �`� --- 61.4 ge °°`'` I i �r'I, \
o I III �?°°`� ---------
-------- 962 -9 � ° - ° I ��b i oo -----� --,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
r�ti' - - - CB -12 l �2.5%
a, I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
I i I 2.5% I' I' \ RE- 9 61.10 1 \ 231- 1- 5 9. 0 \ \ \
I '1� \ IE=957.00 \\ 1 00 i I i 0 I z3 \ \
963.4X / X 962.7\ I I °M1' --- ���---------� ..----�--
i • II ---��-------F- k----�--- 4----------------------••- -
------------------------- - 1.963 -- --- I' 963 ---- I \
fl
o OI \ \ \
/ I III I a 109 X 961.3 - Q = d- �' �\\ \ \\ \X 962.4
/ ii II 109 I „ I - 1 0\
CHAINLINK---�^ S 2 Ili X 961.8 961.2 x /� j 1i I �1�
FENCE +\- 1 if y J / ,� 111 ti+
li /' \ ! 2.0% I Cfl 10 \ rn X 960.5
ON LOT LINE. .,o ,y / 1 0 o o \
il 1.VAb 2.°% �I I BUILDING E 9 BUILDING F I ,l \b \
~ 76 SF CO i I 1 \ X 958.6
;IISI //II
6,9 76 SF - 6' 9 1 I X11 a I
Ilo. / CB 18 J I I C; I 1 �- co
i RE=962.50 FFE=963.50 I o xCri
960.41
i 1 FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 ; ' � 1 1
I
' I I I �' a.o% I -- 5.1 I
�I' 61.1 X 961.5 X 9 9; 1 \-
�i - I asp I V V u -a -a -o -a -O -O �O. 0O 0 ; J ; O Lo
X 962.6 (J 3.0% I ° 0'� 0" 0' 0 0 00o0Soo0opo0o0o0 0'"' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0.0.0_ I '
i I� V o -o-o-0"0"0"0"0"'o'"'0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 � /�
\ V u u-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o''o'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J
• o"'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o b i I
i - `9� • ; 1 \ I x u
I
° 1 1 X 958.7
96�.--•-•� •-• -�\ ° I °�' g 1 I CB -4
I ge a �90i 1y° - e^' ,.7% °dry 2.,% / e'•�o' a 1 RE=961.60
\I \ IE=957.00
RE=961.60 -i = - I -� rn I ,'o
gel I a t• o }� a i I 1 6)
IE=957.00 •� I '6 }o � 1� I
i ° la 4 ISI CB -14 T, g° _ �i 1 0
{ �/' RE=961.90 \ 961.4 X I X 961.3,1, JF it 96.4
I CV
� ?�I I IE=957.00j 0 \ 1
v F+ S 010-O'O•'O"O"O„Ov OVOo0o0°00 O000000000 o0o0AOr OnO�On0.,0..0,.0^q �` V' I
o -o-0-0"0"0"0•'0•'0"0 O O tD 0 0 0 0 0 0 I /
1 Vo-O-O-O'"O•" "O"O•'O•'OVO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
ee? X00 \ i 'I i X959.9
2.8% s0I I it 0111 1X_961.0
,I 1 X 961.3 , I'IN
'
iln II \ �(�= i a 1
I I -P-
I,
X 962.7 '98% �1, BUILDING G �'\I BUILDING H ;' _ $;rye
I, II II o
li °etiI 6 976 SF --- - 1 6,976 SF x 961 _ ,�.- --5.� +\-
II II
I
IIII CO CB -19 1i iii
0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
S
�O� ��� BUFFALO, AVENUE
553f 13
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
GO MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SW4' AND NE'r,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
GENERAL GRADING NOTES:
1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for
Monticello, MN, and the latest Minnesota Department of Transportation
Specifications for Highway Construction and all NPDES requirements except
where modified by these contract documents.
2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project.
3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" 48 hours prior to any
excavation (1-800-252-1166.)
4. The Grading Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground
utilities with utility companies prior to any construction, and immediately notify
the Engineer of any conflicts.
5. Erosion Control shall be constructed, as applicable, as sequenced below:
A. Silt Fence.
B. Rock Construction Entrance.
C. Demolition
D. Common excavation (grading).
E. Seed and mulch or sod (See notes on Landscape plan).
6. Final Plat shall govern for easements and lot dimensions.
7. Any erosion control items necessary to protect adjacent properties shall be
constructed by the Grading Contractor.
8. Erosion control maintenance shall be performed by the Grading Contractor, and
removed as per the Contract Documents or as directed by the Engineer,
followed by all necessary restoration of disturbed area. This work shall be
incidental to the grading contract.
9. The Grading Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate
certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet
the following:
A. Within the upper 3' of streets, the Grading Contractor shall utilize
approved soils that are within 1% of the optimum moisture content as
defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with compaction
meeting 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding this compaction
by more than 1 %. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95%
Standard Proctor Density, and be within 3% of the optimum moisture
content. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'.
B. Grading tolerances for the remainder of the site shall be 0.25'.
10. All areas of unsuitable soils found in the pad described above that cannot be
corrected shall be located in the field by the Grading Contractor. The Grading
Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of these areas and provide
information as to their size and location.
11. The Grading contractor shall provide positive drainage on the site at all times.
12. The Grading Contractor shall keep public streets and travel ways clear of soil
and debris. Daily cleaning at the construction entrance shall be performed,
especially at the end of each day's work.
13. All silt fence shall be removed at project completion.
14. All proposed elevations are at flow line unless otherwise noted.
15. All erosion control best manage practices shall be per City standards.
CHAINLINK---- X62.3III RE=962.50
aFFE=.FENCE + FFE=963.50 IE=959.00
X 960.7
\
0.5 FT. WEST I
" o I
" 109
OF LOT LINE. I11 109
flilb�!V� 1 I
II
n
' I I 963 '
ae? II, 963 --- ------------ - ,�---------- ---------- j Q2.07 I
_ _
co Solt, -- --- ------J- -- - e'
N 2 0% �J\ T fi 1 I� \ � 1 ;'
\ - CB -6 I \\ �\ b�� ii ; % g61�; ,�1.1 X 960.6
9si.so aP\°6,� RE_961.40 I I °�' °� 951.7 CIP o /
e ♦ IE -957.00 o I °
g , 5 ?moo X ax62.4 i I 2 j I, \� I oe�� a
e ' �� 2 � � �-- 6 - ,per' � _ ' 0�O
N 96 ---------- --- ------
° :--- --- FP yy I CB -5
962.6X °�°� os,---- _----------------------------------: _
2
-------------- �- � RE 961.40 p
I
962.9x -------------- --- -.� ---�- ---.��;. x.962 \I
= 962 -` �� 961 IE=957.00
CB -7961 „h.., �• 960 LANDSCAPE
RE=961.40' / 960 l 959
IE=957.00 �� 959' 958 1(J 958 057 \ ` cD ---EDGING/MULCH
957 01� j �\ .-,g6\ � / / ; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
962.2X - - _ _ X 961.8 0)\ - 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
�l x FES -B --- 962-� i O O
967.2 X -`\\ IE=957.00 �' L / QI p 9 \ (n
111\ cfl � � -� 1 �i , X96_ ,---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 00
�'' < u c�� 7 r 057 1 I i 114 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 O
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- `If 957 _ 958 \ m Q)
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER --- II; -T'� 959 958 960 959 y�,� _, 1 »
v -Pd-. N 89°14 00 E o m o .-
960 _ .� ,tin. I �t 961------------�- --X--- / i
_ Z W
N 89°14'00„ E , l' \ � 962 -------------------'--------- ---- ------1899.53------ 2 Y
------3123.56----- 964.2 x�---' - 963-a-„�y-r-��0 62.5- --fir _--- - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _
----------------- - - --- _ 1.3 0 o v
963.7* o o�a96�-- Q ------- -
° ° ° �Q__ �,�___--=-_-299.81------961- °°
_MOW-!=°°a�q� -_��R - _ �-(300.02_ \ �`� ---SHED-962---'-' ' °°° a'--`�`�" 66 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
- - LINE �, -960-\\�� TC 958.96 - - Plat) _ _ _ _ _ i X 961.6 g61
Se �� ; _ -960- X 960.2 CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN FILE N0. 00633
O,�` �� L STORM WATER ��` � �'�CURB 960.5 X I
h gs h ' --TEL. LANDSCAPE
°� 9�\X� (N INFILTRATION BASIN at STOP i RISER EDGING/MULCH C1 SITE PLAN
X NWL = 957.00 - - - - - C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
�`� EDGINGSCAPEIROCK , GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD - \ ��-�B � `, _ _ _ _ _ _C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
2 YR = 957.82 SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL
10 YR - 958.79 LEV. = 958.16 - - --_
8c SHRUBS 100 YR = 58.79 1 � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
SEE BASIN DETAIL -)9- 958.7 ON DETAIL SHEET �' I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
-- - - - - - - - _ I - I I I I I I C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8 D ETAI LS
h
C9 PHASING PLAN Grading and
A I� A k rr_ r- _T_ A I_T_ F__ ahs ��'� N I I I A III Fri I S I n N i l I I I Drainage Plan
LOU
CU
W
0.
3
O
N
(0
w z
CC
10
Q)
a
O
to
Q
.�
NION
(
LOU
i -ii..
a:f-
w z
Co
111Zi_
No
W
C
0C)
-C -Li
0
_Q
W
O
oQ
-�
a
p
I z
�1•+
!
r
Q
Q Q
W
MOM
�Cr
0M
LCIO�
CO
v, '^
a
o
CZqL°
Co
L42
r7
N
(� co N
W
E
LO I o
U L O
;moo
Z
L
I O� U
x I Q)
Qom`
o
~
I mm dcnp.�
-15
4 j
c
~
100CZ
I W°� ai 3
c 3
p
000
U_
�. O00
J
IZ
l n
O
i
)
`n
o
an
U O
O
O
D
N
a
3
°
Q
a
°c" o
Z
°
J
CHAINLINK---- X62.3III RE=962.50
aFFE=.FENCE + FFE=963.50 IE=959.00
X 960.7
\
0.5 FT. WEST I
" o I
" 109
OF LOT LINE. I11 109
flilb�!V� 1 I
II
n
' I I 963 '
ae? II, 963 --- ------------ - ,�---------- ---------- j Q2.07 I
_ _
co Solt, -- --- ------J- -- - e'
N 2 0% �J\ T fi 1 I� \ � 1 ;'
\ - CB -6 I \\ �\ b�� ii ; % g61�; ,�1.1 X 960.6
9si.so aP\°6,� RE_961.40 I I °�' °� 951.7 CIP o /
e ♦ IE -957.00 o I °
g , 5 ?moo X ax62.4 i I 2 j I, \� I oe�� a
e ' �� 2 � � �-- 6 - ,per' � _ ' 0�O
N 96 ---------- --- ------
° :--- --- FP yy I CB -5
962.6X °�°� os,---- _----------------------------------: _
2
-------------- �- � RE 961.40 p
I
962.9x -------------- --- -.� ---�- ---.��;. x.962 \I
= 962 -` �� 961 IE=957.00
CB -7961 „h.., �• 960 LANDSCAPE
RE=961.40' / 960 l 959
IE=957.00 �� 959' 958 1(J 958 057 \ ` cD ---EDGING/MULCH
957 01� j �\ .-,g6\ � / / ; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
962.2X - - _ _ X 961.8 0)\ - 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
�l x FES -B --- 962-� i O O
967.2 X -`\\ IE=957.00 �' L / QI p 9 \ (n
111\ cfl � � -� 1 �i , X96_ ,---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 00
�'' < u c�� 7 r 057 1 I i 114 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 O
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- `If 957 _ 958 \ m Q)
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER --- II; -T'� 959 958 960 959 y�,� _, 1 »
v -Pd-. N 89°14 00 E o m o .-
960 _ .� ,tin. I �t 961------------�- --X--- / i
_ Z W
N 89°14'00„ E , l' \ � 962 -------------------'--------- ---- ------1899.53------ 2 Y
------3123.56----- 964.2 x�---' - 963-a-„�y-r-��0 62.5- --fir _--- - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _
----------------- - - --- _ 1.3 0 o v
963.7* o o�a96�-- Q ------- -
° ° ° �Q__ �,�___--=-_-299.81------961- °°
_MOW-!=°°a�q� -_��R - _ �-(300.02_ \ �`� ---SHED-962---'-' ' °°° a'--`�`�" 66 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
- - LINE �, -960-\\�� TC 958.96 - - Plat) _ _ _ _ _ i X 961.6 g61
Se �� ; _ -960- X 960.2 CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN FILE N0. 00633
O,�` �� L STORM WATER ��` � �'�CURB 960.5 X I
h gs h ' --TEL. LANDSCAPE
°� 9�\X� (N INFILTRATION BASIN at STOP i RISER EDGING/MULCH C1 SITE PLAN
X NWL = 957.00 - - - - - C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
�`� EDGINGSCAPEIROCK , GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD - \ ��-�B � `, _ _ _ _ _ _C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
2 YR = 957.82 SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL
10 YR - 958.79 LEV. = 958.16 - - --_
8c SHRUBS 100 YR = 58.79 1 � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
SEE BASIN DETAIL -)9- 958.7 ON DETAIL SHEET �' I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
-- - - - - - - - _ I - I I I I I I C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8 D ETAI LS
h
C9 PHASING PLAN Grading and
A I� A k rr_ r- _T_ A I_T_ F__ ahs ��'� N I I I A III Fri I S I n N i l I I I Drainage Plan
MH -1
48" DIA. CONCRETE WITH
OUTSIDE DROP -
NEENAH CASTING R-1642 - - -
RE=961.50
IE(W)=943.54 (8" IN EX) h
IE(E)=943.54 (8" OUT EX)
IE(S)=949.33 (8" IN)-
IE(DROP)=944.00 (8")
DROP=7.82 FT
00
SAN MH h1
RIM ELEV.=961.96 ��•
INV. ELEV.=943.7 , �
CONNECT TO CITY
10" DIP WATER MAIN
10"x8" WET -TAP WITH
8" GATE VALVE AND RISER
DUNDAS
���� ROAD
I
N �
\
00
15 R.C.P. m - s ♦
1AN MH
9 o h END OFQ
EXISTING WATER SERVICE CULVERT ; /g6 RIM ELEV.=960.04
`� (� 960.0° - �� 959.90 INV. EL V,.=942.8
61.11 ,� 6 GATE VALVE - p 1 BURIED off- _�
960.66) _ l );-°6-960so* X60 959.79
's - - - - - 960 %16-
'` REMOVE EXISTING 6" x,60 X 958.6
I EXISTING SANITARY ��59 3,
REMOVE EXISTING STREET PAVEMENT AS o -��-To4�959.7. = PLUG CONNECT WITH = 960 9 _ -'o.- 8 - - - -
�, T -- T �- SEWER SERVICE ,o -T_ o^' �- �0_. RISER
NECESSARY FOR UTILITY INSTALLATION; SAWCUT - -9 ° 3� �'-!^'o - �'so _ _ _ _ _ 8"x6" REDUCER AND TO REMAIN WITH �� -=96 i _
FOR CLEAN EDGE; REPLACE PAVEMENT TO MATCH _ Y,� r 8" DIP CL52 PIPE - -_- -_ - - - -_ NO CHANGES �=_
------------ -_ _�`� "- " > - -
EXISTING MATERIALS, SECTION, AND ELEVATIONS. � _ =-_-------= == -�- ' --------- - - -- ---051.5--- ° - X 961.5
mss' ° "----- - - s------- 6, ---- 6 0
ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE p; ;I . s0 ��o 8 DIPWITH CITY STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A 1'.� I I 45° BEND L� ` �\"r ,,�J�
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR REVIEW AND ` -CULVERT -g62� Bryk r„�6 / 96� ; °,6�= -
9 . �? _ �� �6� EAS °�`O t 8 „ DIP As . o I >
APPROVAL BY THE CITY, AND OBTAIN EXCAVATION I I fl _ R _
PERMIT FROM CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �' ;.� 9oti x g.g 458 BEND X X63.' �, 45° BE
Y I6�� I > X 863.0
r I\\\
" ss-- TPRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. , - ?,; �I 1 I I 1- - 6 °, - - - - -9s I �0 62 , X (OI
c, �g 4 40 0» 20 LF 6 PVC ? ,
W �I Ir, I ticP
I X00 \ 20 LF - 6 PVC �6�' _ _ __-. _ _SCH 40 @ 2.0%�° 8 DIP
m I �� II --- ------------- -- SCH 40 @ 2.0% -----.------- - -- - - SLOPE OR GREATER �., 45*BEND
I I SLOPE OR GREATER ! I DOMESTIC SANITARY t
Q I II DOMESTIC SANITARY IE=954.10 I
IE=954.10 _ 4 I
184 LF 8" �' I 96'.2
PVC SDR 26 '9� ih - 6"x6" DIP TEE _ _ - - - - - - - 6;'x6" DIP TEE \ I
}, - - 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER 1 X 963.5
@ 0.40% II o2h? 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER _ l \
\ h 19 B'JILDINC /43 LF - 6" DIP CL52 BUILDING B DOMESTIC " DIP ER CL52 FIRE I X61.9 1
\ 92••5 co DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 6, 976 SI- I
963.1 X \ O I I
6,976 _SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY I� \ \I I X 964.2
\ SUPPRESSION SUPPLY TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 \
F TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 FFE-963.0 II ' I 1
\
FFE =963.0 - Iloh° I \ \ X 96
\ I ss I\ X 961.9 - \962'0 '� X 6"..3
I \ z? .
f rn \ I
' \ „ O -O -O -O -O -O O"o"0'0,0.)060608°O°O°O°Oogo,J0 ovo
4J ° ° >o„o„o_o_1_o i'
��°�o�o; -o_o_o ° ° 0000000,00000000000°°°° 197 LF - 8 - -9�U MH -3
I M OE 9s� o --- - --- - @ 0.72% 26 ----- -- I ^° ---- - - -- R0
°oo o °
- m 48 DIA. CONCRETE
-'Ro -- --\-- - X o o�
X m NEENAH CASTING R-1642
963.7 / 6� - . - L �; -- g6� '
96�.5x I�s .-.-.-. .-.-.1ro g .-.-. o I _ ryo 1967.. I m RE=963.05
i . 62, ti o
s / �, roti �o�'° = IE(NE)=952.05 (8" OUT)
MH-2�o
48" DIA. CONCRETE "� 96,., / 1-0 \ 1 \ \
NEENAH CASTING R-1642 I I ° / 96� _ \ N \\
RE=962.10 I - ��� I \ �0 8„x8„
IE(E)=950.62 (8 IN) cp I I _ " - - - .----------- X $rsfiao� 1 I
�, 8"x8" -- :I --_- 258 LF 8 DIP CL52 - ° ,�, �o DIP TEE
IE(S) 950.12 (8 IN) X > gq.��
°o°000000 °o °°°° ° ° ° �° WATER SERVICE INSTALL AT god' I I I \
IE(N)=950.07 (8 OUT) I DIP TEE o„�, i 960.9
_ I 96 DI \ MINIMUM 7.5 FT BURY DEPTH II i i I iX 96� 96Q J
' I I I
LINE f I \ \ ' I
i I I' - 6"x6" DIP TEE I,-"-M0W I I I
I 6x6 DIP TEE /x96 \
' I 961.7 / 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER LINE I II II \\
X0'„1 f / <'>� 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER i N
n�,) n 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 17 LF - 6 DIP CL52 .1
BUILDING C BUILDING D DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE it I I
DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE X 960.6 I I
964.5 X I I Ilo�, I C° 6, a 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY 6, g 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY I I X 960 �,, X 96X 963.9
I tA I 6250 i TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 I TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 I II �8
' I WO(�j F_NCE FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50
964.4 I °j 'I COf I'zP + \- / II rn� e m rn CO I
--140 LF - 6" PVC 40 LF - 6 PVC ! II ;:, Q o I I
\ g,i2YQQ \I,_c�1 LINE a SCH 40 @ 2.0% I
� I u cF+ �
o
0, SCH 40 @ 2.0% 1 X 9F 1 .5 / ti o I I I I
490 LF - 8" DIP I I `, a SLOPE OR GREATER I ___ _____. =: 963 DOMESTIC SANITARY GREATER i 96 " o I w I 6
1 SLOPE `
CL52 WATER SERVICE I I \ r9s __ ____..____-_:963.__.. DOMESTIC SANITARY ; - 9��e ' 1 ` IE -954.10 ;I 1�6��'' 96� '� O I X95.61\ I\ IIXO X 963.8
INSTALL WATER I s �' \ ?e C _ ; 0 _ I c0 I I
6 J i o IE -954.10 0. o rn I
SERVICE AT MINIMUM \ \
I I I
7.5 FT BURY DEPTH/ ^ I I - I �° = �' ;{
962 l ` ----------�- - 96L'--- G2 9 iI I` O �g
0 6, � X \ 5 5
962- 20 X\ n r n n I 7Q g u 007 0
962.3„ I I I I� 790 LF - 8" DIP CL52 WATER
' I 62 0o 16
II I 9 /9 ho h° -oti- - oti1.4 os mol; �o� o IllRBURY INSTALL
DEPTH AT MINIMUM 7.5 CORNER + �-
e o ---- 0°� ----- Doti- �`- - e I--- iiFT
s __ �� I
I ill 0ri96��---- �'�-/4I I I �9oti° rn ! 5.1 1- I. L.ASI UI- LOT LINE
?\ \ \\ \\
I II f ,;� I o 20 LF - 6" PVC s I ; 0 59.0 \ \
963.4X /X 962.7, I off' o - _ a
II 62 �� 20 LF 6 PVC ---- -- Son ---- ------ - o \
/ e I'o _____L�-------------• SCH 40 @ 2.0% .� �
,�• II 19 -------- ---------- -- - SCH 40 @ 2.0% - - II rn ; I
„ �1 �I I ( SLOPE OR GREATER ;; ,� HYDRANT No. 2
272 LF - 8 I SLOPE OR GREATER 0
PVC SDR 26 ! I DOMESTIC SANITARY »
• II I DOMESTIC SANITARY IE=954.10 II 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER
@ 0.40% I I rn • II I IE=954L 11.10 _ I; Q;= I 12 LF 6" DIP
CHAINLINK ---�^ 92 II X 961.8 961.2 X / 1 II ; 6x8 DIP TEE
FENCE 6"x6" DIP TEE _ I GROUND ELV.=963.00
ON LOT LINE. �o �I //, - 6"x6" DIP TEE \ 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER = 0 1\ \\ oX 960.5
0 i ;;I, 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER BL ILDING F 43 LF - 6" DIP CL52 = I
B JILDING E43 LF - 6" DIP CL52
/ II coo g 7Fj SF DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 6; 9 76 S� DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE = 0 1 \\ X 958.6
, SUPPRESSION SUPPLY
II / II SUPPRESSION SUPPLY TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 I \I CO
II TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 ! ;; 1 X 60.4 coo
FFE =963.T FFE=963.50 II y° o 11 !
ll I
ss \,4. � X961.5 -�" X9 .9�
v v o 0 0 0 0' o' ► 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ / , I !
2.564'o" o . I 0
`; a�° „ 000�°o
X 962.6 �� ° ° ° ° ° ° ° 8" DIP 1
k' °00000000000°oq;oo°°° ° °> ° ° ° °_°_°_° ° 197 LF - 8
?s
s� - - - - PVC SDR 26---�----- XU' / / �� �9 /, 1451° BEND I 11 X 958.7
MH -4 I I - �a -- - ---- - -- -- - @ 0.40% \ , .
48 DIA. CONCRETE \ i1- 6� o • - • -�\ o� / g6� s
NEENAH CASTING R-1642 - 7' ' T - - g o 6, \ \
O �' \
RE= 9 61.85 { 96' 90 . \ /
C) -0.
�,9� eo J °o \ 1 0 \ 1 I
IE(E)=951.26 (8 IN) -+ I ✓��� do I I
IE(N)=951.21 (8" OUT) I96'�° g66 ��� �g6�- I. ;�. _;'-� IMH-5
= I \ 961.4 X X 961.5 8" DIP 196 48" DIA. CONCRETE
8"x8" DIP TEE I - \___________. ---------------- 45° BEND I 0 NEENAH CASTING R-1642
�o
o"'' ---- _ >< u o o -o ° ° ° ° ° °�°�c00000°�0-0- RE=963.05
AND 8"x6" DIP -• °-o-°-°-°-o- o� ° °o°Doo°Doo°o°o o ° o 0 0 0 oti I
REDUCER (SOUTH) s �� °o^°^°^°v°°°°°°°°° °°°°°°" °" ° ° ° ° ° ° ° �° �f = IE(NE)=952.05 (8" OUT)
6"x6" DIP TEE 1 X_961.0
I 6;'x6" DIP TEE 961.3 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER 0
Ili h ; 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 II
X gory^ I BUILDING G 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 BUILDING H DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 0,
962.7 }; w B DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE SUPPRESSION SUPPLY _
e62' 6, 9 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY 6, . 76 SF TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 - 5. P + �-
TOP OF PIPE = 9.56.00
133 LF - 6" DIP CL52 WATER i 1' FFE-J63.50 \ FFE=963.50 ;' 11 y I' x 960.7
SERVICE INSTALL WATER SERVICE , I� \ ,=
AT MINIMUM 7.5 FT BURY DEPTH I �, \ 10" I
OF LOT LINE. 40 LF - 6" PVC
40 LF - 6 PVC "r r I I
9 SCH 40 @ 2.0% j j \\ _�Y - SLOPEORGREATER
96a.3p1 I s _ __ _J_-_ - SLOPE OR GREATER =- = �� -_- ----' -C- - DOMESTIC SANITARY f 1 ° 0 I
f\ DOMESTIC SANITARY
r°v' 1 „ o \ IE=954.10
6 DIP IE -954.10 \ o° o°' 6, ao', _ 9 1.1
22.5° BEND o o" I I I ! ! ti \,,o� I I I I ,! 9 X 960.6
961.80 `\ 9 960 96L I I \ +90 \,w 951.7 90�?° �p ! „' /
" T
````_ 9S 6?� i i 1 OOI t 9 / o
19 5 20 I s s ' I
X 962.4
I 962
----- -
0o�oh L-- - - - --- - 962
962.6x q
962.9X o���.-�--------------------------.�------- -� 962 -
0
HYDRANT No. 1� 961 -mow 962 �F2 F i.961.960 .959 0
960 jc��2 � 958 LANDSCAPE
6" GATE VALVE AND RISERI\ // .95g X y 957 ,--EDGING/MULCH
GROUND ELV.=962.65 / �/ 958 957 4 1 1 °' 0 '
919, \ ,g6\' I.-CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
,�j I�(1 Irl �0 00 ,--�_� I �/ 962.2X____96 -X961.8 �\ ' `I 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
967.2 � `�,\\ � / '��\ I �� 2�\- L� / 09
-A\cfl - 1 0>96_ ---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
1\i ` X 099 3 957 1 121 R 25
GENERAL UTILITY NOTES
n.
0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SW4' AND NE'r,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for the City of Monticello, MN and all Minnesota
Department of Health and MPCA requirements except where modified by these contract documents.
2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project.
3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" prior to any excavation (651 -454-0002 or 1 -800-252-1166 out state.)
4. The Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction
(storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water, natural gas, telephone, electric, etc.), and immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts.
5. The Contractor shall protect all existing utilities and facilities to allow proper functioning during and after construction. Any
required supporting structures shall be supplied by the Contractor as work incidental to the contract.
6. The contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts between existing utilities, and the proposed construction. The
Engineer will coordinate with the Utility Company in question to determine the need for relocation of the existing utility.
7. Existing conditions such as sand in manholes or valve boxes shall be identified by the Contractor and these shall be reported to
the Engineer prior to excavation by the Contractor. Once construction has begun, all damage to underground utilities will be
assumed to have been caused by the Contractor, any repairs necessary shall be performed by the Contractor at the Contractor's
expense.
8. Final Plat shall govern for easements.
9. The Contractor shall coordinate with the local jurisdiction to obtain permits and meter for water source. All associated costs
shall be incidental to the Contract, including disposal of test water into City's sanitary sewer system. The Contractor shall
not operate gate valves or hydrants on the City's water supply system.
10. The Contractor shall notify the City Engineer and the Project Engineer 48 hours prior to starting work or as required by the local
jurisdiction or be subject to being shut down.
11. The Contractor shall keep access roads clear of soil or other debris, and perform daily street cleaning as required by the
NPDES permit. Positive drainage, controlled with erosion control and erosion prevention measures as required by the
NPDES permit shall be performed. Inlet protection shall be installed within 48 hours after inlet construction. Unless specified
on the plans or as a bid item on the Bid Form, any temporary culverts, ditches, filter fabric, etc. necessary to accomplish this
shall be performed as incidental to the Contract.
12. The Contractor shall preserve and protect the markers and monuments set for the subdivision of the land.
13. The Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate
certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests
shall meet the following:
A. Density tests shall be taken on all trenches at locations as determined by the Engineer or his representative.
B. Within the upper 3' of streets, private drives and parking lots, Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1%
optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with 100% Standard Proctor Density and not
exceeding compaction by more than 1%. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95%. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'.
14. The Owner shall pay for all testing of soils compaction. Any areas which fail to meet the above standards shall be corrected
and re -tested by the Owner's testing agent at the Contractor's expense.
15. All water main shall be installed with a minimum of 7.5 feet of cover.
16. Contractor shall provide temporary traffic control in compliance with MN/DOT "Temporary Traffic Control Zone Layouts Field
Manual" most recent version for construction adjacent to travel ways.
17. Contractor shall be responsible for verification of the depth of existing stubs listed on this plan prior to the ordering of any
fittings, structures, castings, etc. Engineer, Owner or City shall not be responsible for any discrepancies found as depths are
estimated.
18. The contractor shall coordinate schedule with adjacent property owners to minimize disturbance for water shut down and
temporary closure of access if necessary.
19. The contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with utility companies for power pole and/or line relocation required.
20. The contractor shall provide all necessary traffic control.
21. The contractor shall be responsible for all grading and restoration required to restore surfaces to like kind existing condition.
22. Existing curb and pavement damaged or impacted on adjacent property shall be restored with in-kind materials and section.
All match lines are to be saw cut.
23. The contractor shall obtain a Utility Excavation Permit from the City Public Works Department prior to commencement of utility
connections.
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER 958 .957 ` \ ` - - 959 OF SECTION 14, T. ,
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER 959 .960 �� _ I N 89°14 00 E
T \` 960 ^ _ X y03.4 61
N 89°14 00 E 961-'----r-----962g---------- _-��----- ---- ------
------3123.56----- -- 962 ----- L.- y. 8 i iv y i 4 cf' t 962 5 y _O _ "- _ - -
_ i 1899
964.2X '�--'- 963- -� - f -= ------------------------
------------------� �G. ��- .7 _��- __ C? It / 961.3
-- _P�__- ^963.70 a�6�Q= ���y ---_ ---------961- 1 / 00000 ,`S�� 3
MOw_, _;o o �°a 00 R __- - 962_--1� -- �.-- 66 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS.
- a° � 4? - - �� - SHED
- -LINE - i� \.\`I` TC 958.96 = M- _ _ _ - _ - 1 X 961.6 61 - -
960-Q�\ - �--_ C'k I - _-�_--�9 X960.2
-INoh°'��� / \\� S9� �``��v ��� \STOP 960.5x; I; -LANDSCAPE CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
-- TEL.
�G x ,; _X x \ RISER EDGING/MULCH C2 GITE PLAN
RADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD h�� '��CB ', _ _
�h EDGING /ROCK °' �LEV.=958.16_ - _--SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL r- - - - - - - _ _
8c SHRUBS 1 � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
SAN MH X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
ELEV.=958.59--. 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
------
-------I� \
� I I I I I I C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
Ga I I I I I I I C8 DETAILS
I I/ JI F__I n I I F__n F_ -)A ,h �` Fr_ (` _T_A I�� �` �h� �� N I I � n n f-`1 I S I /� N I I ► I I C 9 PHASING PLAN
w
ct kr)
W �kr) O�
M
r^ O ctCn
p
ct ct
WO�
CU LU
0 ' z
O (0 �, CL
_
CC C Q
CIO a Cc to
■� Q W) Cn -
Lft 1lft a:
caw
Z �Z
W �� ZE Q:�
r -LW
� W c o w <
0,
mm�O m wo
O ,v o z
'~ mibm
O Q ct
Q
ca W z
■Nam
v /co
a
o
V
00
Co
CZ
q o
42
DoE
W
oo
_;J_
N
°c
01
-6
o" c
x l o
m U U
0
W
oo_�._
a
Q p
N0.
00633
' �0
c2
o��
c`o c °
U a'
�.
-I-
S J
CC\
s
q°
Q.
2
0
m
Cl
CL
V
00
(DN
W
DoE
W
oo
�} U
��
01
-6
LLJ
x l o
m U U
0
W
oo_�._
FILE
N0.
00633
' �0
m
Cl
CL
C3
Sanitary and Water
Utility Plan
V
00
oo
W
3
LLJ
0
0
0
FILE
N0.
00633
C3
Sanitary and Water
Utility Plan
I I
I
I
FES-EI ; 18" RCP FES -D; 18" RCP
INV=959.70 INV=958.80
- WITH 3.6 CY CL3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �-
_ RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC- - - - - 40 LF 18 RCP CL3
lb ROAD PIPE @ 0.LUD
40 LF 18 RCP CL3 DUNDAS ),°' LENGTH INCLUDES FES
I PIPE @ 0.75%; }<a' ' FES -C• 18" RCP
LENGTH INCLUDES FES - - - - - n" n I p „ -i I I I I I NV=958.60
I I I -_-144 LF 24" PERFORATED ' 144 LF 24 PERFORATED I WITH 3.6 CY CL3
I FES -F; 18" RCP I DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE
DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC
' INV=960.00 @ 0.00% WITHIN
L� @ 0.00% WITHIN -4- - ' '- '� 5' MH
O - ► U � INFILTRATION ROCK g 0� IM ELEV.=96
♦- INFILTRATION ROCK = I 6
SAN MH I • 61- TRENCH; SEE DETAIL 9�� TRENCH; SEE DETAIL FES -A
h1 I �°� Q THIS SHEET 960.OZo - i 959.9 INV. EL V 4215 RCP
RIM ELEV.=961.96 �• I THIS SHEET �� - - 60=960 so)<' " 60 959.7
961.11 ---•--fit I X ,� INV=958.70
INV. ELEV.=943.7 , °� � _ _ - 960 r �_ _ _
I ,< _ - - - - __ ss8� gig- -I� - WITH 2.9 CY CL3
�o -960- - - _ _ °,80 4'5 X 958.6
I _---961 9g9 - 959.2X - - XJ) --_ (X 959.3 x- �o�os+' ss -- RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC
959.7. _
960.6 X T p- - T T T - T T T - T T �S-�9 960 X\ T- -9�0 q6�- -SOI 8>0_. RISER- - -
- - g6o� �Ic". �" 1 ' 1 •, _ 1961ro
!RL 1 ; 8 LF 18" RCP CL3
- -
- - - -
----9b? - - - - - - - - _ ---_-962-
PIPE--- ----------- - »_ - - - - -
�(I @ 1.67%
962
962.1 s _ - -=- ---- - - 1 ��� X- _ - _ _ '6' - - _ s (0--_ 001.5 96��1 LENGTH INCLUDES FES
-o
A '30 �6ry �. ; 9ts .4
I ! CB -8 -9 - - - - �o # CB -1
}� s 60 DIA CONCRETE s� 9 - - 60 DIA CONCRETE
EA SE96 r �� 9s2 -
_ NEENAH CASTING R-3067 �`, ti° NEENAH CASTING R-3067
CB -9 ---- X RE=961.10 '1 ���6�� I ' p RE=961.20
962.8X Q ;' �'-ss2� 48" DIA CONCRETE - _ -96 - _ IE(S)=958.00 (12" IN) ss 1 x'62.' X IE(S)=957.00 (24" IN)
NEENAH CASTING R-3067 � ? I �'
. RE=961.20 33 __.._ __ ____-__---.._-- -- °- IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN) - ---- - ° I `J I m IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN)
I rn - ------ 1 - IE(E)=957.00 (24" OUT) ; IE(NE)=959.00 (18" OUT)
IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) i I IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3 DEPTH) \ _
z I
' IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH)
IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH)
109
109
I I !II
h
IL 9li'.2 86 LF 12" DUAL- WALL CB -16
41 IIS HDPE PIPE @ 1.16% _ _ - 27" DIA CONCRETE ' I 96215 1 148 LF 24" PERFORATED
{1 1 o' - "" . �° NEENAH CASTING R-4342 d
LLJ i I 96�� i i P°� CO '
\ " BUILDING A 2 RE=962.50 II I X61.9 DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE
\ 9;,2.5 III 976 SF i�g6 ~ IE(E)=959.00 (12" OUT) II I fi 1 @ 0.00% WITHIN
963.1 X) O f I I;; 6' �i ii ;s! \ INFILTRATION ROCK
I I \ TRENCH; SEE DETAIL
FFE = 963.50 ' 1 THIS SHEET
FFE=963.50 �" ° I \ X'9 0-
\ 11 I - 144 LF 24" PERFORATED '�6� X 61 ..3 \ ��
\ X9157 - `�?
I I I ss2sl,; \ 144 LF 24 PERFORATED ly DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE
Nl�; \ DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE >°°�°0000�°"°°°°°°°° © 0.00% WITHIN -9�
1 LI�JE 9s� ° ° ° \° ° ° @ 0.00% WITHIN __ INFILTRATION ROCK >r0 I \ I
/ I I _.,o I ----- INFILTRATION ROCK - --- TRENCH; SEE DETAIL / I I'� \
X I - TRENCH; SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET - I' m 1
963.7 96.5 X 1 _ . - . . -THIS SHEET - - - . °o . - . - - I 1 ryo ss�� X\961\8X 963.7
I s I I ° ° \ \
OP Cn
-{
967.
I I I �o I / g6� I g6� I *
964.3 I - -L,,�, ° CB -2
[7 1 I �� , - CB -10 X R _o,-� I 60" DIA CONCRETE
I rn 1 • CB -11 ---- ; - 48 DIA CONCRETE -°- o /� NEENAH CASTING R-3067
I I X"� 48 DIA CONCRETE °o° °-°-°-°- °"°"° °�w °-° NEENAH CASTING R-2573 °6 I 961 RE=961.60
j�0�/_ I ss2 NEENAH CASTING R-3067 °^° ° ° ^ ^ ^ RE=961.90
IE(S)=957.00 (24 IN)
RE=961.60 IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN) " "
LINE 11 I I \ ; IE(W)=957.00 (24 IN)
co I I IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) _ X \!-,w M(IE(N)=957.00 (24" OUT)
w I IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3 DEPTH)_° IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3 DEPTH) {y I�� �A LIIIE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH)
'C�t7n (� nl III nlh Ir- n d ii \' I i1 I I I
I I ; 11 / BUILDING C ��
CB -17 `° I�bti`'° X961 ;''I X 960.6 I I
I I I .,o III I X X 963.9
' ti I', l 6 9 76 SF 27 DIA CONCRETE I 10 ;/ X 9�0. w 96 6
964.5 X I
I I I��6I 5�' i NEENAH CASTING R-4342 I ii - 962 I 11 I I II
I I 11 962 i / 74 LF 12" DUAL -WALL E(E) 6959 00 (12" OUT) I,1, I 2.50 All,WO 11 INCE FFE 136 LF 24 PERFORATED
HDPE PIPE @ 1.35% N 1 W „
964.4 1 °j 'I COQ + \- `O
109 °'
109 i Il, - I z DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE
9 i,2., 00N -I -o7 LINE „ ° p @ 0.00% WITHIN
I r, v cF, X 961 .5 -144 LF 24 PERFORATED -�6ti� ;; f w
I -144 LF 24 PERFORATED 7, DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE 11 0 I INFILTRATION ROCK
= DUAL- WALL HDPE PIPE -------- ----- = 9sr--------- ----- - X96
r9 --- -- - - @ 0.00% WITHIN �;' Ilbti 96 5' O I X TRENCH; SEE DETAIL
\ 1 I 9s I I s?8 r @ 0.00% WITHIN ;e° INFILTRATION ROCK 311 I THIS SHEET
INFILTRATION ROCK I TRENCH; SEE DETAIL
TRENCH; SEE DETAIL '�° __
THIS SHEET 962T �° - _THIS- SHEET o \ °'6 - 6`'� 19s I# �'` F� X1 5 51
o =---'3 ---------- ----- ti �" �.
i ;1 titi 0 61• 6ti 962 ° '20 ' \ X I 9
h6���62.3I °° \I q6� ° 1 I ,� a�959.4 �� X 963.8
'I 19s I 962 ° tih° --962.-_9&� °,6�°----a6��u61.4 9s�- .°,eI ISI \\ \ I
II 96--- 96-� -- 'tom t I 1 moo,' ° li oo - \---,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +�-
• .0 6ti _ CB -12 I I, ti° I CB -3
I i i I I i% II It9 I I I I I i „ 1 9rO I i „
1 II 60 DIA CONCRETE D. 1 59 60 DIA CONCRETE
• a CB j 13 - �° NEENAH CASTING R-2573 - 1 9280 " '� NEENAH CASTING R-3067
963.4X /X 962.7 • 11 I ---- s_ II I
62 48 DIA CONCRETE \ 6N
j 11
NEENAH CASTING R-3067 963----- �.�--- RE 961.10 f 11 1 I RE=961.10
/ 11 '� I IE(N)=958.00 (12;; IN) I 11 mac' 1, � o IE(S) =957.00 (24 IN)
IRE=961.10
�- IE(S)=958.00 (12 IN) 11 I I IE(W)-957.00 (24 IN)
IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) x61.3 01. I IE(N)=957.00 (24 OUT)
IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3 DEPTH) IE(W)=957.00 (24 IN) 1I I I 0 1 IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH)
CHAINLINK ---�^ 9'2• IEE -957.00 (24 OUT)
FENCE + �- 1 i 11 /' f IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH)
ON LOT LINE. 74 LF 12 DUAL -WALL 16ti'I I \ \
HDPE PIPE @ 1.35% 5° r I9 I 10, _ 1 \ \ oX 960.5
06 r =
IIS BUILDING E CB -18 II -
41.I _ I \ \
11 • 962��,1 1 \ X 958.6
6, 9 76 SF 27" DIA CONCRETE I I 1i = 0 1
NEENAH CASTING R-4342 \\
RE=962.50 I X 60.4 \
_ I
FFE=963.50 IE(E)=959.00 (12 OUT) °
° I
9 Hyl '
962 1V61.� X a�1.5 144 LF 24" PERFORATED X 9 _ .9 116 �- �__5.1 \-
.50 k 144 LF 24 PERFORATED 0
X 962.6 �l/• I I' r °"° °^° ° ° o ° °_°-o_ DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE ) I,
" o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0"0 0 0
1 k°o°�°uo0o0o0o0 DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE -^ ^ �� - /a-, / I � 1
• ,'�9s� @ 0.00% WITHIN i i © 0.00% WITHIN �6"'• �` `9 /, I \
INFILTRATION ROCK / 0 1 X 958.7
INFILTRATION ROCK TRENCH; SEE DETAIL 6 / I `
TRENCH; SEE DETAIL �, - , - . - . -- . - • .° 1 \ 1 \
_ , . - . • - oo THIS SHEET
s °
I sTHIS SHEET 6ti. I 0 0
I ''90 j7 q .) \ \,9n
do6
CB -14
CB -4
CB_ 15 Q I -'�_' 48" DIA CONCRETE < 961.3 �° 1 96\�' 60" DIA CONCRETE
() 48" DIA CONCRETE \�____ NEENAH CASTING R-2573----=°6�=---7 I 0
912. NEENAH CASTING R-3067 -_X_9 .5 RE=961.90 °"°�o�o�o�s�o�os h° 1 \\ NEENAH CASTING R-3067
o° °"°"° o ``ro I
`RE=961.60 Mill°^ ° ° ° ° ° ° ° �\ IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN) I � RE=961.60
IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) IE(S)=957.00 (24" IN)
IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) ! 11 1 X 961. IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN)
",IE(N)=957.00 (24" OUT)
i
11 NoI �tih°\ of III nimr� u v il9�i ht
X962.7 }96ry SII BUILDING G y� \ CB -19 CO 6ti. �I10
, 6, 9 76 SF I 27 DIA CONCRETE X 90.11
' I
{ 962.3 NEENAH CASTING R-4342
CHAINLINK --� I \ I ! II 0
X62.3 RE=962.50
FENCE +�- I -I FFE=963.50 \\ IE(E)=959.00 (12" OUT) I I X 960.7
0.5 FT. WEST:
86 LF 12" DUAL -WALL--' \ 109 i 1 0 1
OF LOT LINE. I HDPE PIPE @ 1.16% � IIR ° 1 I 1 A I ('910
�. 63 1 CV o
(0 9s2.3 I� I �- __ 963 -- --- - _- 's - _-_-_-- -C-- ___ �_--- = 9i--t----�---- I -��°1
qIt s -- ---- ----- �� �_--_ _-_--- �2 a ,!
N IIs? i 14 LF 24" PERFORATED I j0 \ 114 LF 24 PERFORATED JII II I I
" \ DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE 11 fi o X 960.6
110 DUAL- WALL HDPE PIPE I \ @ 0.00% WITHIN o, ! 961 $ Ij / _ X � 1.1
961.80 f @ 0.00% WITHIN ti� o „
1 9s I I INFILTRATION ROCK titi ! ;;
\ ''-9s ?� INFILTRATION ROCK 1,
TRENCH; SEE DETAIL i '6 1 0
9 15 j ?20 0 TRENCH; SEE DETAIL 'ss,
9f;2 THIS SHEET -----------J ! THIS SHEET e ---Q61 : 1
962.6X--- ------------------- „------------ _
0
9629X - .._ --_X-==962_" -°j- .� - - ,.� --+t - - , 62
961
/ "I 961 �F2 F 1 960 0 LANDSCAPE
16 LF 24" PERFORATED � 959
DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE / 960 959 X Jtl�2.� 958
@ 0.00% LENGTH 9 958 957 �� I \ 957 .60" DIA CONCRETE E CORNER +\
-
INCLUDES FES - _ < NEENAH CASTING R-3067
>':-1ck( _1 X S,° \- ��--_- // ��/ 962.2X\ -_96 �_�X961.8 LOT LINE
96- FES -B RE=961.40
IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN) LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
24" RCP _ CB -7 C8-6 -957 IE(N)=957.00 (24" OUT) SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER INV=957.00 60" DIA CONCRETE ` �' 60" DIA CONCRETE , 958 ' N 89°14'00" E
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CC WITH 5.8 CY CL3 �'�' T� - •, _ _ NEENAH CASTING R-3067 I ` �a 1 IE(SUMP)=954.00 (31 DEPTH)
„ �er n I T NEENAH CASTING R -3067.27X
N 89°14 00 E RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC' 96 = �nJ 4 ------RE= 961.40 ------ - -- -- ------1899.53-----
RE-961.40 9. �s i iv � ,y"i � -o_ `1--------,_, --
-----3123.56----- 964.2 �� \ =-963 962- IES -957.00 (24" IN) �--� IE(N)=958.00 (12 IN) - ;�- _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_ - _
�< - - () -,
IE(W)=957.00 (24 IN)
--------------------�=---•-IE(E)=957.00 (24" OUT)
/� 961.3
IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) - - - _ _ - /1,_00
o - - _ IE(E)=957.00 (24" OUT) ° ° s
mow-
2- - -lao--- IE SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) --_Iii
r -LINE = -e - -` 960 QR\��V TC 958.96 = M' _ _ - - (` - _ _ _ I X961 -6_q61
"
X 960.2
��. -,CURB XI '---TEL.
_ 960
Goho' X \959, °``33 STOP 960.5 I --TEL. '-- LANDSCAPE
_X X \ 11%
RISER EDGING/MULCH
�� LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD h�� '���cB ',,
�h EDGING ROCK °' �LEV.=958 16 _ -SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL �
/ � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
& SHRUBS SAN MH X \ I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS
ELEV.=958.59 958.7
F- - - - - -I- - - - - I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470)
I I F__ A IS A ,h am Fr_( -_T_ A I S F__ l N I I A nF_`i I _T_
Gp�
1
INFILTRATION ZONE
MNDOT SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL 1.0' ABOVE PIPE
12" ABOVE PIPE
I
r- - - - - --
r--
INFILTRATION ZONE
" TO 2" WASHED AND
CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL
12" TO SIDES AND
12" BELOW PIPE
24" PERFORATED
HDPE PIPE
1.0' BELOW PIPE
r
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
n
0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
GENERAL UTILITY NOTES
1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for the City of Monticello, MN and all Minnesota
Department of Health and MPCA requirements except where modified by these contract documents.
2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project.
3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" prior to any excavation (651 -454-0002 or 1 -800-252-1166 out state.)
4. The Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction
(storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water, natural gas, telephone, electric, etc.), and immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts.
5. The Contractor shall protect all existing utilities and facilities to allow proper functioning during and after construction. Any
required supporting structures shall be supplied by the Contractor as work incidental to the contract.
6. The contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts between existing utilities, and the proposed construction. The
Engineer will coordinate with the Utility Company in question to determine the need for relocation of the existing utility.
7. Existing conditions such as sand in manholes or valve boxes shall be identified by the Contractor and these shall be reported to
the Engineer prior to excavation by the Contractor. Once construction has begun, all damage to underground utilities will be
assumed to have been caused by the Contractor, any repairs necessary shall be performed by the Contractor at the Contractor's
expense.
8. Final Plat shall govern for easements.
9. The Contractor shall coordinate with the local jurisdiction to obtain permits and meter for water source. All associated costs
shall be incidental to the Contract, including disposal of test water into City's sanitary sewer system. The Contractor shall
not operate gate valves or hydrants on the City's water supply system.
10. The Contractor shall notify the City Engineer and the Project Engineer 48 hours prior to starting work or as required by the local
jurisdiction or be subject to being shut down.
11. The Contractor shall keep access roads clear of soil or other debris, and perform daily street cleaning as required by the
NPDES permit. Positive drainage, controlled with erosion control and erosion prevention measures as required by the
NPDES permit shall be performed. Inlet protection shall be installed within 48 hours after inlet construction. Unless specified
on the plans or as a bid item on the Bid Form, any temporary culverts, ditches, filter fabric, etc. necessary to accomplish this
shall be performed as incidental to the Contract.
12. The Contractor shall preserve and protect the markers and monuments set for the subdivision of the land.
13. The Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate
certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests
shall meet the following:
A. Density tests shall be taken on all trenches at locations as determined by the Engineer or his representative.
B. Within the upper 3' of streets, private drives and parking lots, Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1%
optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with 100% Standard Proctor Density and not
exceeding compaction by more than 1%. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95%. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'.
14. The Owner shall pay for all testing of soils compaction. Any areas which fail to meet the above standards shall be corrected
and re -tested by the Owner's testing agent at the Contractor's expense.
15. All water main shall be installed with a minimum of 7.5 feet of cover.
16. Contractor shall provide temporary traffic control in compliance with MN/DOT "Temporary Traffic Control Zone Layouts Field
Manual most recent version for construction s. adjacent to travel ways.
Y
17. Contractor shall be responsible for verification of the depth of existing stubs listed on this plan prior to the ordering of any
fittings, structures, castings, etc. Engineer, Owner or City shall not be responsible for any discrepancies found as depths are
estimated.
18. The contractor shall coordinate schedule with adjacent property owners to minimize disturbance for water shut down and
temporary closure of access if necessary.
19. The contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with utility companies for power pole and/or line relocation required.
20. The contractor shall provide all necessary traffic control.
21. The contractor shall be responsible for all grading and restoration required to restore surfaces to like kind existing condition.
22. Existing curb and pavement damaged or impacted on adjacent property shall be restored with in-kind materials and section.
All match lines are to be saw cut.
23. The contractor shall obtain a Utility Excavation Permit from the City Public Works Department prior to commencement of utility
connections.
CASTING I CASTING
954.0011r
s ALL SUMP
STRUCTURES TO HAVE
2 - 3" WEEP HOLES
IN BASE SLAB
STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE
SECTION VIEW
TYPICAL
SLOPE TRENCH
SIDES PER
11 -OSHA REQUIREMENTS - -
Illi 12" MINIMUM
SELECT GRANULAR i SELECT
1111 -- MNDOT
ABOVESPEC
P PE 9.2B 111111 �� FILL
i
- INITIAL
ENCASE STONE 12" 12" BACKFILL
MATERIAL IN D Illll HAUNCHING
- - - GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
MNDOT SPEC 3733 - 12"
TYPE 1 ll 11111 BEDDING
11111E 11111®11111111116 11111®11111=
1. BEDDING SHALL BE a' TO 2' WASHED AND
CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL
2. FILL PLACEMENT SHALL BE PLACED IN 8"
MAX. LOOSE LIFTS AND COMPACTED TO 95%
STANDARD PROCTOR.
3. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO BE PLACE ON TOP
AND SIDES OF TRENCH ONLY. NO FABRIC ON
BOTTOM.
INFILTRATION ROCK TRENCH DETAIL
954.001( r
s ALL SUMP
STRUCTURES TO HAVE
2 - 3" WEEP HOLES
IN BASE SLAB
STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE
SECTION VIEW
CB -1
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
C1 SITE PLAN
C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8 DETAILS
C9 PHASING PLAN
0�4 �m
L U
CU W
O
CC
CIO 0
L
Co W
Z
UJW
a:
� O
Q.
1
INFILTRATION ZONE
'0
1
INFILTRATION ZONE
1.0' ABOVE PIPE
MNDOT SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL
W)
1.0' ABOVE PIPE
MNDOT SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL
12" ABOVE PIPE
100
Z
12" ABOVE PIPE
O
t
1
Q
W
0
18" RCP
W
Lv
W
OUTLET PIPE
O
DO
24" PERFORATED
INFILTRATION ZONE
Qct
O
24" PERFORATED
INFILTRATION ZONE
HDPE PIPE"
TO 2" WASHED AND
959.00
HDPE PIPE
J" TO 2" WASHED AND
ti
CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL
CRUSHED
SHED STONE MATERIAL
O
12" TO SIDES AND
V
TO SIDES AND
12" BELOW PIPE
12" BELOW PIPE
V957.00 957.00,1
957.00.,
I
T -
A
i
1.0' BELOW PIPE
1.0' BELOW PIPE
r
r
36" SUMP
36"
SUMP
954.0011r
s ALL SUMP
STRUCTURES TO HAVE
2 - 3" WEEP HOLES
IN BASE SLAB
STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE
SECTION VIEW
TYPICAL
SLOPE TRENCH
SIDES PER
11 -OSHA REQUIREMENTS - -
Illi 12" MINIMUM
SELECT GRANULAR i SELECT
1111 -- MNDOT
ABOVESPEC
P PE 9.2B 111111 �� FILL
i
- INITIAL
ENCASE STONE 12" 12" BACKFILL
MATERIAL IN D Illll HAUNCHING
- - - GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
MNDOT SPEC 3733 - 12"
TYPE 1 ll 11111 BEDDING
11111E 11111®11111111116 11111®11111=
1. BEDDING SHALL BE a' TO 2' WASHED AND
CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL
2. FILL PLACEMENT SHALL BE PLACED IN 8"
MAX. LOOSE LIFTS AND COMPACTED TO 95%
STANDARD PROCTOR.
3. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO BE PLACE ON TOP
AND SIDES OF TRENCH ONLY. NO FABRIC ON
BOTTOM.
INFILTRATION ROCK TRENCH DETAIL
954.001( r
s ALL SUMP
STRUCTURES TO HAVE
2 - 3" WEEP HOLES
IN BASE SLAB
STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE
SECTION VIEW
CB -1
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
C1 SITE PLAN
C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8 DETAILS
C9 PHASING PLAN
0�4 �m
L U
CU W
O
CC
CIO 0
L
Co W
Z
UJW
a:
� O
Q.
a
o
00
qL
O2
L• ` I + N0)
N (� (0 N
C C I p E
V L O Z W I OLO O�-6
CO o IZ
4 y p W I m ��-
oEo 100UN0
r3 (1:
CZ
►, 00 O
-cow
q,OC
v
J O
-b ", c m
U O O D
Il ° b C
,J
�3 a
N
'0
Q)
QDz
�CL
O
W)
CnCL
a:
I -
100
Z
zJ
J
O
w
O
Q
W
0
W
Lv
W
O
DO
Till
Qct
O
CLU)
a
o
00
qL
O2
L• ` I + N0)
N (� (0 N
C C I p E
V L O Z W I OLO O�-6
CO o IZ
4 y p W I m ��-
oEo 100UN0
r3 (1:
CZ
►, 00 O
-cow
q,OC
v
J O
-b ", c m
U O O D
Il ° b C
,J
�3 a
FILE N0. 00633
Storm Sewer
Utility Plan
100
O
N11
O
DO
V
ti
Q
O
O
p
V
FILE N0. 00633
Storm Sewer
Utility Plan
0
00
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I i T
1
Lul O_10 1
SAN MH 1 1
RIM ELEV.=961.96
INV. ELEV.=943.7 ,°��4°• __R_
,(___-961
960.6 Xj. ooh `��o=T os r
962.1
I
9 _q �N
PT ;I .•3o e
,I•i.�l
962.8X Q 0
✓�' 2 0
X29 / .r
1 '
I
DUNDAS
���� ROAD �C� -
C
I
X - 1
10 D.I.P.
� o
\15" R.C.P. i = ► i �- T� m
c � I �N MH
WB
M o -�; 96,0 ooh 1 /96� RIM ELEV.=960.04
`� 960.00 - �� 959.90 INV. ELF�V,.=942.8
6 96 66 r� ) c' - - , °6°�= 960°so) (, 60 \ 959.79
( - _ 960 p l� I�l�s I~ % * 9°� 1
_ g�9- -
- - - - 4 c_-_ � -� �• � »-9-+; _X958.6
�9 �T T - T 96 X 959. q6�6°=��°I-9S8�o_ RISER
,I iii �✓"r-,9b- Hr _ -� , ` _ - ----962 - -
p�,
962 X 961.5
----- ` '� _
_M_ X _ _ ' -6_____60
fir°
' 9uq'.4 'Io
.T ,
0
9 - �o I
o -
-�°` �0 962 bry� bti° ss
eEAS ,9iT17962�� / ° --- ?A ;
_ i' ti° ' '� 'X 963.0
96,I
--- -
\ 0°- 2� I I�
V V \
Lit �i ,v II�0 `°� - --------- -- 963 ---- -----\umm n •0) X96--- ------------------ � -- 963 --------- I ��� -- __ _ --- I -- i`�n 1 ill:
11 1 I"I I ,: 1 �< = I
II •� I I� I Y - I
0
-1. r
SIONL I
C) 10 9 6
1- -
109 0
C7
• I
MULCH I
I -I
oP 0 LY - a 96215, �- . \ I X 963.5
II
° I_
X 962.2 K 1 \
EDGING
0 <I I 50; � o°_----------- � II I
\ LLI I 962 I1 K FG BUILDING A 862 y°6� BUILDING B 0 it ;I 1 X61.9 \►
X 92 ;5 6, 9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF o 11 I I I\ \
963.1 X\ 0 1 I I1 0 11 1 ;� \ 1 X 964.2
FFE-963.50 \
I I � fI �/X6
DS- FFE=963.50 0 116ti�1 \ XL96'0962.0 „M� o000°°0000�o�0 0ou°o�000�00�000�000000(bn0n0n0„O,�OB4O,•O_O_O_o_o n n I --LITE 19s�o \1 ----- __ I RomX - X a_ob963.7 96 .5X'1 96�� g X\961j8X 963.7
- -1� - - - . _ . - . - . - . -° - . - . - o6 0r O 0ry \ \
\ \
I -*co
961, ) / I
964.3
1 co I I I X--�65fi�6��
X :9r' .� 1 � -- - �` .... --Ja - ° °oo °o°o°o°oo0ono,�o00 ®�0 1 I I \
J u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ono D o g o 0.0.0.0 n n 62._
°oOV°�°uou0000000000 0�0�0 o o o o-o-o_n n n rte^ iI i
MOW --_ ' 1 96?s� 11 I 960.9 I IX g6�3 IX96�/
LINE ° 11
1 1 11 �X-MOW I I I I
0 0 -1 _ X 961.7 / 961.0 0`1 iN LINE
O� � I
w 1 /// `��� BUILDING D o�y�o.�.� ;� ► I�
I I BUILDING C I I
; 1 Q � � ° ! ' oti' i �9 I I ,,I X 960.6 I I a�
964.5 X I j 1. 16�,o b / 0 6 9 76 SF 6,976 SF ®I ,� 1 0`�., 1 I x 960 x 96,x 963.9
I I ° 11�
I o 4
I
1 ---WO _ _NCE
964.4 1 °j'1 CO E +\-
.0
)12.; SON -1H _0 LINE
I \ I I
"962 I
\ 11 96 . 1 ` 1 'so
► , �I I 11
^I 1 I
962 it 1/ �8
U 0 II -
I I
FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 1111
1 I 1 1 n l l
I
I
I
C ' c C, ; w 0 II I I
109 O / 109 11 1 °' I: Q o l l
1/ 0F1 -7 / ii 1 Q I I N I
X 96 1 .9 a 4 -9 11 1
a I �963---- - ,., - o l II o I IIX 6�
L � � _-------- --------- III I, I �
-- -------------X96 . II o 9 X95.61
------ 963.-- = -- --------=-------------- 1__ 96a--_ _ _ 6� 6 I' S/ I \0 \ II X 963.8
-- 1 60 1 \ 1 I I
11 i1 \ -�° h° �9 11 1 1 I
° I L. 6 - I
1 9 96ti 9�O 62 -; ;_ ` } foHS I I Fo'
I I i 11 1 o_s�s0 + , 9 - ryo �o \ `'�o - 9s, 1 \ C" X 5 51
X 963.8
11'� �j 62.3 °otic \ ob5�o A61 �6ti 862 I 201 ' ■ X� 9594 �- I g
/ I o6 I °
• I
962
it I i i I 196c?2 ,✓ .y0
11 I9
I I Co
KI -1
1 ' I
I II
11 11A1
I I I 962 °°i i U)/ 160°
963.4X X 962.7•
II
h° 5 I ti° 1' \ \ I
862._-9fi1=�e`°�------a6ti�61.4 I 96� �6� I 1I ■ [�_°\
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
�' I \ I 1T96ti°� 1II 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
1 1C\ \
Ex \ � 1 s�1 11 1f� o '59.0 I \ \ \
\-- --------I ..----i-?8° I ii 11 I \ \ \ \\ \
\ --- ------ 9-�r------------------------ - 963 --- - - - - II 10 ■ \
/ e --- ---- ?��- -- 9 63 ------- -- I I
---- --------------- -- I I 61 I
I \ \
II c -p
11 I l 0
10) I11
111
CHAINLINK ---�^ 9 h
FENCE + \- '
II
1•
ON LOT LINE.
fro I;} /
962 6OI i �}-
II
II II
II II
/ II
II �
111 6
I
962.801.6 1
" r) 1 \
I I I a ' 11 I 1, . 0 I\\
Q 11
\
X 961.3 0 11 - II \\ \ X 962.4
109 II a �. \
X 9610.8 961.2 X j // c 11 I ° I
_ 11
/ / / o I11 o I \ \
o o \ \ oX 960.5
� 1
BUILDING E ��L BUILDING F o 1962 1I = \ \ I
9 76 SF o x 958.6
6,976 SF 6, o 11
� 11
- 1 1 I X 60.4 \ coo
FFE=963.50 FFE.50 0 I
X 961.5 \� X9 f9° 1 I 5.1 -cs I
��~Imo\ <o I
0
X 962.6 (� 1 1 1\
I u V o o- o" o 0 0"0 0 0 ono
1 \ V v u V-O-O-O-O`O-O`O"O Ono 0 0 0 4 0 O_O_O_n n
V u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 onono 0 0 0 0 0 0_0_o_o_n ^ i.
- J 1 • - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o_b_n
IP
o
'r s,o I 1 \ x�`° 8 i' f 9 1 I 1 X 958.7
61.
6� ro� 20 \_ byry° J 961PO
,01' o \ \
1_� I / 1 1 1
0 9�
✓�� do i I c9
L; 96,->0 - C6b
961.4 X i X 961.3 �o 1? 96\� 4
C3 F - -7 0
d2..0 _ CO5 i - - ___ .: J J --O,�,O--O_O..O..O..OvOvOVOV OVOV O°°O�O�O�O�OI°O�C1°^°C•°^°^°^°^°^°° I
X 962.7
CHAINLINK --�
FENCE + \-
0.5 FT. WEST
OF LOT LINE.
II'
)A1962.3
,
1962.3 11
I'
I 11
I1�
I I,1
(0 96Z 3011
0)
N 1`
i1
I
� I
961.80
\ ;
9 �5
.A v u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O„O_O_O_o_o
0 0 0 ouo°o°o 000000�0�0�0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o
\ 0 X 959.9
I I X 961.0 I
X 961.3 0 1 1 1(•, TI
\ 0 1 ° , Q7 O I
0
BUILDING H I I
BUILDING G (. 0 :: `'t
\ 6, 976 SF ° 1� I 96ry�1I 0
6,976 SF { 962.3 o I I
\ " 751
FFE=963.50 11: 11
FFE=963.50 111 /
11: I X 960.7
C \
4? \
109 109 0 1 1
t r I I
l \ a
I
a A 1
1-�- , _ 9 63 ----------- --- o -I ,; 6 N o
__
--- --- I
---- -__963_-_ -__� -T=�-------- - �J_ C- T9o��;11 ;;' rn
____ -____I
6y`O° X9 1.1 X 960.6
96ti6 \ 6ti I I 951.7
T
�° X 962.4 R g I I I! 96,
962
_� �6�.
962.6X °�h 6� C -- I------------ ---- --------------------
962.9X ----------------------------C�-------------w -- --- --------------- , 962 s
061. O o
- t_ 0 GRAS'S'
961 _ FV& 959 o LANDSCAPE
960 959 3< \��Z•ti `- �� 958 957 \ (o -EDGING/MULCH
U) 9s, \ ,96\ ; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
,,, I`1 I� U) -00 , - - _ Q' _ / , 962.2X - - _ _ X 961.8 �1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
\ �C - 191-
X 1
967.2 - (Ln
Q / I '
�ry
\ - - �' \� I'�� o 96� 9 ,--- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
1\i X a�2 r 957 1 1 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- ( � E� - - - 957 `_ 958
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER --�. --��.AMIL
N 89°14'00" E ,�,�I� �' � - \ ------ 818°99.53
'00" E
-----3123.56----- 9642X1^ - 3 3 --- --i --------------
1
- - - - - - - - - - - - -� --- C) '/�^� `� 961.3
R__ _ -- j-
"963.7 o o a 9( �� - - - - 1 00000 a S(�
_ / �3
�gFMOW-,-=� °aQ�`3Q �R\-F� _961- �96 _�� -- x._,.66
o - - LINE - �, 960-\��� 4C 958.9 - _ - - - _ _ �� _-_SHED 2-= - - - -
P _ - - _ _ I X 961.6-961 _ X 960.2
NO S �"3 \ ��` \ �,'CL CHAINLINK FENCE I -TEL - LANDSCAPE
oho' CHAINLINK FENCE -J \959 �h 1 7 S � 6.0 FT HEIGHT 1 EDGING MULCH
X 6.0 FT HEIGHT X 1 \� AT 1.0 FT FROM RISER
LAND AT 1.0 FT FROM'DEN EAGLE ROAD h�. -�\C PROPERTY LINE
F THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL
�h EDGING, PROPERTY LINE °� _ -SOUTH LINE 0
8c SHRUBS \ PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
SAN MH I 1 1
I I/ F__ N I
X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS
ELEV.=958.59 -- . 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1 1 1
-----I------1 \
F__ A F__) A ,h Tr_ (-- _T_ A I _T_ F__ r- �h� N 1 IA F--"\ Fri I _T_ I
fMF6 ♦ { s
W& 9E
dt i
�- _M _
(612) 599-8G75
�crod�raaka
r Ra MALS
.w >o n.r.waL
N-
- PLTERNATE METHODS 0' ITEM STAKING PRE SHOWN.
IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HOWEKR, THE CONTHACION
IS RESPONSIBLE POR THE MNNTNNING TT8£S IN A PLUMB PO -ON THRWGHOUT
lHE GUARANTEE PEPoOD.
%APoI BOTTOM AND SIDES 01' HOLE PPoOR TO PLANRNG.
CONI Q TO HAAS SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS
oTHwvnsT: NOTm.
NO NULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK.
CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL
rRIEM a
SUM WAKE
_y
ii i(t l j
2-N ,r Min. (I J
I L l 1
n.
0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
KEY
QNTY
SIZE
NAME
00
ABM
6
2.5" BB
Maple,
Autumn Blaze
RB
5
8' Clump
Birch, River
BHS
17
6' BB
Spruce,
Black Hills
DS
104
#1 pot
Daylily,
Stella
KFG
32
#1 pot
Grass,
Karl Foerster
LANDSCAPING NOTES
The landscape contractor must comply with all applicable federal, state, county,
and local regulations governing landscape materials and work.
All plant materials will be guaranteed for a period of one year from time of final
acceptance from owner.
Trees and perennials to be installed with suitable planting soil and fertilizer.
Commercial black poly edging to be installed between turf areas and rock
beds. 1.5"diameter river rock to be installed at 3"depth in all perennial beds
over fabric weed barrier.
All trees planted in turf areas to receive a 4' diameter mulch ring. Mulch to be
shredded natural hardwood installed 6" deep with no mulch in contact with the
tree trunk.
Turf areas to be sodded with a locally grown bluegrass blend sod. Native
seeding areas to be seeded with a native seed mix to be approved by the
owner.
Underground irrigation shall be provided for trees, shrubs, and sod areas.
15' POLYPROPWIUM at
PaTntBnaE ()0
W. 1-1/r
■DE smAP tw.
DOME STRAND 14 DA ME -
Y • 1W KMRIAAL CM1
DIME WRAP T) FORT BRANCH
T iomtx OE WIN DDME STRAND
04 GUM YM - J PER TEE
C -r LAMM OF SHIMCCD WADTDDD
MUCH N SAIICt9t-0I0,11) PASP SPARE
IVIAL GRACE OF FLANt
911M ONOM GRAM 10O
rxraD' SPANEs wr u r APART
XMW WE BALL AT At= - 7 PDt
�DAIf10RL wT1 "I"M UL
�NUFwt PfDBPAL DP
NOTES:
TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE SHOWN.
IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR
S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT
THE GUARANTEE PER,
OD.
SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING.
DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL
HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (TYP.).
SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING.
SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
C1 SITE PLAN
C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8 DETAILS
C9 PHASING PLAN
� w �
M
oc
WO�
Lft
ca
W
N
O (o
10 w
� Ld
Q
.CO CL Oto
1111111
�z
0111111•+Ca Z Z w CLW � Zi
w 0 CL
Wc o w<
Noma O m wo
,v o z
7- CL O O
C)
CLW
0''~^^
CO v,
FILE N0. 00633
cs
Landscape P/an
00
O
ti
0
)I -
co
Q
o
W
W
v
FILE N0. 00633
cs
Landscape P/an
I
I
DUNDASROAD QC,
I
xo
1 - I
ROCK CONSTRUCTION00
o
II � 15 C P` L r ,-i ► `ENTRANCE INLET ,N MH
Q. h PROTECTION
SAN MH ; • 61'' o - `6 `96'0 o`ti (TYP.) M ELEV.=960.04
g 96 0 I.V. EL;},=942.8
RIM ELE INLET I I 961.11 ice' 6" DIA. ;0.66 "'� �C° �X _ )('. - - � �60�0 960 °so* ' X60 959.79
INV. ELE PROTECTION op Q0
-61- ,-� - - -BIO-LOG _ - - ..\ - /r _ 9se�• - -'"� ' e SILT FENCE I
I (TYP.) �o -ynv- - - _ i X 95
I --9 1 9•I X �X 959.3 o s �.V
960.6 _ ►: ���'- 59.7. _V959T2.X - - �-� 6 o o S -
%� J,0''�.• r: T T ' T T r - r 95�� �. i, �� T_ 960 06�- ' �- RISER- _ rGo
1------------ � _- ��==-962 »»y�-- n ----- 961X 961 5`962 9 ---_",.=�_------------_"- � - -- - /-- C /� --- ----==---f °9�,�`- -- 1;��1' yb V ~962.1�o u1 _=__ - '�X�--_ - � _ _ - _ �6 DIA. - 01.5 ,�° 1-TFII��. 1 9t�o 4 �o - �� BIO -LOG II INLET INLET INLET -/ -g _ - 0 1 PROTECTIONPROTECTION ,�o`PROTECTION °6tikse '6v I,�- > (TYP.)(TYP.) A6rl'EASE (TYP.) R I``\lv°1 - - _ -----_ _---r \, 663.0
.9s��40__: rl X 9.9 IX363. _, �N ;I x19962.8X�;0 \ X61 ��o- \ -- 9s?eo'1 { X62.
0
W j; co �IILI -11620 _ 6 --963-=-==--_--
--- ---- -I: 963 ---------------- ---- ---µ- - -------------------- - i i CC) I
I
Q
109 I
it
SILT FENCE I II 109 I-oo _ !I-- SILT FENCE
I1 9i'.2 __ �6�I I
! �h / I g6215;# \ I\ X 963.5
61.
X 962.2 _ -
I . 62 bah ; I I! \
9 BUILDING A g62 +, BUILDING B X 61.9 1
9 ;;;2.15 I 6, 9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I
963.1 X; o I I I; INLET I I \ I X 964.2
• 1 PROTECTION X63.50
!,1 /X6 \X96 6)
FFE=963.50 (nP.)It ,��6�lX 961.9 962.0.a°O°O I00
4j L \ 5�°�a 000000�o"o"000�00000000n) v�u0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°0°°°°0 000" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n MW IuOo0ODO0oo O0�0�0�0°On nOr,OnO O O O O O O_o_n n n ---. T -_--_------_-__-- 6U O\ LI E ------ - - ----- - ------ / o - - X a, 0m963.7X96 .5X' 9'-'-C6 X\961j8X963.7
i . _ . - . - . . - . - . ° O
ti
I 06 1 1V Ito
C co 1\
`�• .,o �/ INLET 1014
N �,� INLET
964.3 I I INLET I PROTECTION
1 PROTECTION I c9
P I `n I rn PROTECTION �� °° (NP)
`� I __ ___ TYP. I
6�:- -___ moo- u u 00-°= -°�Oo O° On°,.0.°.O o -o o J
9r(TYP- aro 0 0 0 0 0�0�0 0,.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,
I I X I �•� °o°o°o°o°o�°,�,o°o�o„o_o_o_Onnn
, I ' � O°b°n°n°n 00000000000000 OOOr,O„OnO,� O O O O O O _ O _ o n {, O . . ��
MOW --_ 196 I I I IYY 960.9 I IX g6�3 Ix96��
1.I
LINE
I 1 I \ I I I •�
i i I
" _ 11 -MOWI I I 1
II I _ X 961.7 //X961.0 X �0. \1'I�LINE I I I \�
/ \ -{y , N I
;�, BUILDING D I SILT FENCE_
1 BUILDING C
._ ; �6rti�'I , 11 �� X 960.6 1 I X X 963.9
�1° C° 6 9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I „ ,a`rR I x 9�0. i `� 961
9 64.5 X I I 06 = I , I l I 962 i I I/
SILT FENCE, I 625°� INLET 11 I
rn ; 11 e / PROTECTION
963.50 1 I 1
WOI. F -NCE FFE=963.50 -
\II I
I\I \ I
''III
aI (TYP.) /\ �1nL• AE
00;; 6tiI
nV 1
964 COfP109
-��
h
' QQW I oI I1 I
) ON 1_o7 LINE CF1 9 109
' ,9 X 9F1 .0
A ry Q
II
I
I
J
963 ----- ----_ ---- 1X `__�-ti:rX95.619= --------- 96� 5 O I X
96
63.8
96 e
°
I
�0,
I \\\I \ .+ 1
'
---- - - - --- Ery ---9e CO Q 1
- o =--- 30 ---------------------- - ------ do �o--� ?ao - 9s, X �5 51 6�
I1 ti° tip° - 06� 962 I 2a� x \ 959.4 �\� 19 X 963.8
62.3I q6 1 0 5o i �° i; -� �- \ I
9 I g62 ,- -- 6L :61-4- - INLET
- .�
INLET -� - aso ' 0 1 o PR TION INL NK FENCE CORNER + \-
6�' - 06�=---- A I
• INLET �I_ PROTECTION 6ti° ; c FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
11 I PROTECTION \ (NP) �1 a 1� (TYP.) It
I (TYP.) \ I
I. .o
963.4X X 962.7 11--
/ ��--- } --- ---- - -; 963 ------------ --- 1963
II
---------------
I \ \ \
i; • III v 1 \
/I ISI 109 X 961.3 11 - Q;=� I I \ \ \ X 962.4
I °' 109 X / " I I \
CHAINLINK ---�^ 9'1'2 961.2 III X 961.8 / / I I / 11 �• I \
FENCE + \-
ON LOT LINE. I to III / \, / ;'96I �� = o SILT FENCE rn X 960.5
06x11 I 1 / O -
\O I � \ 0
BUILDING E ,- •o�L BUILDING F ;; o,6L'
96201 .I - I - \ \ I
�` 9 76 SF CO 11 1' - \ X 958.6
SILT FENCE I I //I CO 6,976 SF 6, ; ; I 1 1
INLET I I 1 �
/ 1 PROTECTION D63.50 X x{60.4 1
• I FFE=963.50 (�,P) �° 1' 1
9�v 1 1
<, ; I 962 1 !61.� X 961.5 -� X 9 .9 JI
Z/ SO k u v o 0 0 0 08080
'o"o"o� J I °
I u u u o 0 0 0 0 0'0' o 0x0„0„0„0o_o_o- 1 �\
I �� ., u 160-0-
X962.6 uu0 0° °''o°o°o°o,_-0000I.
v u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0'"'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_o_o_n n s •- o
� 000°O 0 0 0 0 0 o..0_O_b_o n , I / I
• ---6666-- --
II I s� _-_--_, ___________�______�_1 \
7` roM 9 ;
- --- - - - - -6666-- \
- \ o - - - ---+_ \ { \\ �6�` - , i'r/ 1 T _ I 1 x 958.7
� n1rl° 967) ;'. \ \
9 O - 00 ` Q 0
6� 90 \ / 00 \ \ 1
I ✓�� \ �� �' � do
INLET
INLET ,-AT
�1 0
_ PROTECTION
INLET PROTECTION X 961.3 0 1 E
1 PROTECTION -
' rn I `� (TYP.) -6666-- ---------------°6 - , o (TYP.)
�I
2. (TYP.)---------,- ---i'� :5-6666-- - 6666 --------- ° ° °to -°-o o�oJn opo 0,0,6"606060coco� h° I \
_ v 1o' 0-0-0"0"0"0"0"0"0"0 O O p,,,,0 „0„0,.0_01=0_o n r , 6• I
u'O-0-0-0'0"0•'0"0"000 O'O < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O,�O OnOr,O„O 0 0 0_80' n _ O'
000000000 0 0, 0 0 0 0 opo 0 0 0 o n °�I
6 s' X 959.9
' 2
00 \\ I 11
: I�X961.0 1
1 X 961.3r14
0 I
16ry1y ,�F��°\ BUILDING H _ ,t II
X 962.7 9 �� BUILDING G .� ry'' -
�1 6ti� 6, 9 76 SF \I
6,976 SF x a6,h I - --\-
;; 9 i' ' < 962.3
CHAINLINK --� '*62.3 1:, INLET SILT FENCE
PROTECTION 963.50 ' �' I
I I
FENCE + \-
-14 FFE=963.50 (TYP.) 11I X 960.7
0.5 FT. WEST 109 i 0 1
OF LOT LINE. 1y 109 T ry I� �° i 1
I
I; I - _ - \\ nl u = - -- '6666 -- �I 96ti N ° I
SILT FENCE ��. (0 962.3111 I _ - �_ _ 4 963 =____-_ =_____-___-= _saw = -____ -C--=--6666-- - ��°i 1 (0 1
963
A s =- --- 6666-- '� - e 6 I i „ rn
rn I s o a \ 9� l 1
\
IJ ( / 7 961.80i i X 9,� 1.1 X 960.6
961.80;96
; L +9 °'� 951.7
n1 _=- 961,y
'9e e?3 i I 06ti x ! 9s, /, o
9 5 ?ao ° X 962.4 6666 I
X61.
962
es
' - ---6666--
s
L ----o ----6666-- -------------6666-- 6666 �° 's �
962.6X �, �� . °61 I 666 6--------------------------- _--;
61h 61� -----6666-- - -
962.9X _ 6666-6666-- -Itt. 6666 962 - _-�
�__ 66 66--6666-- .� "
------0' --6666-- .�---,--, .... - .. �
-..-.�---------962�`��.-.��-- i .961 _ -\
- - -
--961 -062.5 \ INLET 960 959 958 _ _ INLET LANDSCAPE
INLET X .957 PROTECTION ,--EDGING/MULCH
PROTECTION (TYP.)
PROTECTION ,gyp , , I (TYP.) -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
,�� , _� I ✓VL.LX _ _ '96' _ X 961.8 \ `1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
967.2 X `s ; \ "' INLET - - I �' 62� / �9
\ PROTECTION _ / ` - -' \'�/� 0960' -- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
(TYP) YaF9 7 raII 1 121 R 25
IMPERVIOUS AND DISTURBANCE AREAS
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.2%
NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA
41,800
SF =
0.96
ACRES >> 21.8101.
DISTURBANCE AREA
200,441
SF =
4.60
ACRES
EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES
ITEM:
QUANTITY
UNIT
ROCK ENTRANCE
1
EA
SILT FENCE
1,602
LF
INLET PROTECTION
22
EA
BIOLOG 6" DIA
30
LF
SWPP NARRATIVE
This project construction will consist of site clearing,
grading, utilities, building, parking lot, drive aisles, and
truck court.
First, perimeter silt fence and inlet protection shall be
installed. Then site work shall commence. The
contractor shall dispose all debris off-site within 24
hours. Then the site can be graded, utilities installed,
building constructed, curbing and pavements installed,
final grade tollerance, and landscape final stabilization.
Once final grade is established and certified, the site
shall be stabilized with seed and mulch or sod. Once
vegetation is established, temporary erosion control
measures shall be removed.
RUNOFF ROUTING OFFSITE
Downstream water bodies receiving storm water runoff
from the project site:
Select roof drainage is directed to adjacent
wetland adjacent to the south property
boundary
Site pavement and pervious areas are directed
to City storm sewer that drains to City regional
NURP pond (Karlsburger Pond) approximately
500 ft to the north
Otter Creek approximately 1,100 ft to the north
Mississippi River approximately 4,750 ft to the
east
POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES
Solid waste: collected sediment, asphalt and concrete
millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric,
construction debris and other wastes must be disposed
of properly off-site and must comply with MPCA
requirements.
Hazardous materials: oils, gasoline, paint, and any
hazardous substance must be properly stored, including
secondary containment, to prevent spills, leaks or other
discharge. Restricted access to storage areas must be
provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal
must be in compliance with MPCA regulations.
External washing of trucks or other construction vehicles
is not allowed on site. No engine degreasing is allowed
on site.
Concrete truck washout is not to be allowed on site
unless washout waste is contained with no discharge to
ground surface or site drainage facilities. Containment
systems are to be located a minimum 50 feet away
from drainage facilities and watercourses. Containment
systems shall have an impermeable liner. Containment
system shall be clearly marked with signage.
All sanitary waste must be collected from portable toilet
units on site by a licensed waste management
contractor. The units must be secured and shall be
maintained on a regular basis as needed to prevent
overfilling.
n'
0 30 60 90
r �
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. All devices necessary to control erosion and
sediment (I.E. perimeter silt fence, rock construction
entrances, swales, ponds, berms, ETC.) shall be
installed prior to any other construction operations.
2. After completion of final grading, exposed soils
must be permanently stabilized within 7 days.
Stabilization shall consist of disc -anchored seed &
mulch, HECP with fiber reinforced matrix, erosion
blanket with seed, or sod.
3. The site must be kept in a well drained condition
at all times. The contractor shall be responsible
for temporary ditches, or other means necessary to
ensure proper drainage. The building pad must be
provided with a positive outflow. This work shall be
incidental to the grading contract.
4. Entering/exiting of the site shall occur only at rock
construction entrance to reduce tracking of dirt
onto paved streets. Sediment tracked onto streets
during working hours must be reclaimed via street
scraping and sweeping at the end of each working
day.
5. Stormwater discharge pipe outlet energy dissipation
shall be provided by rip -rap with size, quantity, and
placement in accordance with City standards.
Rip -rap installation shall be within 24 hours of pipe
installation.
6. Install silt fence around all temporary inactive
stockpiles which are not place within existing silt
fence area or other perimeter erosion controls.
7. Stabilization of temporary or permanent drainage
ditches that drain water from the construction site
must be initiated within 24 hours of connecting the
drainage ditch to any storm water conveyance
system and must be completed using erosion
blanket.
8. Sufficient personell, equipment, and materials shall
be mobilized within 24 hours of written order (ie.
email) by the owner or owners representative to
conduct corrective work and install temporary
erosion control work in the case of an emergency.
EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SCHEDULE
1. Silt fence shall be installed or restored prior to any
construction. Silt fence shall be located as shown
to intercept runoff. The area located beyond the
perimeter silt fence shall not be disturbed during
construction.
2. Rock Construction Entrance shall be installed prior
to grading operations.
3. All storm sewer inlets shall have inlet
protection inserts installed. Inserts shall be
"Road rain -Top Slab" or "Road Drain -Curb &
Gutter" inlet protection devices as
manufactured by WIMCO (or approved equal)
and installed per manufacture's
recommendations.
4. All erosion control installations shall remain in place
and be maintained in good condition by the
contractor until the site has been re -vegetated, at
which time it shall be removed by the contractor.
For proposed paved surface areas, the contractor
may remove necessary silt fencing to construct
roadway, while maintaining adequate erosion control
in adjacent areas.
5. Sufficient topsoil shall be stockpiled to allow for the
replacement of 4" topsoil for disturbed areas to be
re -vegetated.
6. The contractor shall schedule site grading, utility
installation and roadway construction so that the
general site can be mulched and re -seeded soon
after disturbance. Areas that will not be subject to
construction traffic shall be seed and mulched or
sodded within 72 hours of final grading.
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
1. Erosion control measures shall be inspected by the
contractor's representative and maintained by the
contractor every Friday and within 24 hours after
any rainfall event larger than 112" until the project
is completed. Maintenance requirements are as
follows: silt fence - 1/3 height of fence or
damaged, remove sediment and/or repair fence
within 24 hours; rock entrance - refresh as
necessary to conform to detail; inlet protection
inserts - remove sediment after each rain event,
clean or replace filter when clogged; surface water
- drain and stabilize, within 7 days of discovery;
and street sweeping - remove all sediment tracked
onto paved surfaces within 24 hours or as directed
by City Engineer.
2. Replacement - Fabric shall be replaced promptly
when it decomposes or becomes ineffective before
the barrier is no longer necessary.
3. Any sediment remaining in place after silt fence is
no longer required shall be dressed to conform with
the existing grade, prepared, and seeded with
appropriate seed mix, as directed by the engineer.
4. Removal of the silt fence- Silt fences shall be
removed when they have served their useful
purpose, but not before the upward sloping area
has beenermanentl stabilized.
P Y
VEGITATION GROUND COVER SCHEDULE
1. Stabilization of all exposed soil areas must be
initiated immediately but in no case completed later
than seven (7) days after the construction activity
in that portion of the site has temporarily or
permanently ceased.
2. Permanent turf ground cover shall include all
disturbed areas be covered with a minimum 4"
topsoil and sodded or seeded as allowed by City,
or as proposed on City approved landscape plan for
the project.
3. Temporary ground cover shall be MnDOT seed mix
150 shall be applied at 100 lbs/ac, or equivalent
as approved by City. MnDOT Type 1 mulch shall be
applied at 2 tons/ac and disc anchored in areas
not covered by sod or erosion blanket.
4. Fertilizer shall be MnDOT Type 1 10-10-20 and
applied at 200 lbs/ac. Disc fertilizer into top 3"
of soil. Specification reference is MnDOT 2575.
5. Dormant seed mix shall be used after November 1
or when temperatures do not exceed 40° F, using
some rates specified above. No seed shall be
placed on snow or ice greater than 2" in depth.
6. Any seeded areas that do not become established
with vegetation shall be reseeded at Contractor's
expense.
7. Erosion blanket shall be installed in seed areas with
ground surface slopes of 4H:1V or steeper.
RESPONSIBLE PARTY
Contact information for the responsible party
for erosion control is:
TO BE DETERMINED
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- eJ iTr _�` 558 57 ' `_ \` 95c.958 - \ I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. ,
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER - Il - - �. 959 __ .960 9n� - N 89°14 00 E
N 89°14'00" E 'T \ 960 x �bJ.4 --6666-- 961 ------------- --X--- I ----- ------
�< _----- 961 --- - -- _-_ _� _--- _y_.--_,> _ 962. 962 - ", ------
----
--- i 1899 53
J, -6666-- --- - - - _ _ 6666-- -
------3123.566666- 964.2'�� 963962\ C �� i\� i4uu t y _._ o ,I -----------------------
�<- _ ___
------------------mss"_ -rte O^ "' / �--� 961.3
- - 963.7 o �o,o a,,96�= - - 1 / 1 �Poa000 /`S� `
---MOW-, o� aoS o oo_Q R\�___-- -----961- i� o _vim 66'
- �°�°��� - \�TC 958.96 - �_ `SILT FENCE - - _ ��''-SHED 962--- ; _- �-INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS.
- - LINE -e -960.\\�� Y-----------6666-_ �� I _-� x961.6g61 I X
_ I 960
h�960.2
���.r �\\9S hw `\�� CURB 960.5XI ' -TEL LANDSCAPE CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
�Go, X 9� �X� 1 �\ STOP
RISER EDGING/MULCH C2 GIRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD �,� '-��CE3 _ _ _ _ _
�h EDGING/ROCK °' �LEV.=958.16_ - _--SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL - - - - _ -
8I SHRUBS \ � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
SAN MH X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
ELEV.=958.59--. 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
------
-------I� \
� I I I I I I C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
Ga I I I I I I I C8 DETAILS
I I / JI F__I n I I F__n F__)A ,h �` Fr_ (` _T_A I � � �` �h� � � N I I� � A I� I-`► I _T_I /� N I I ► I I C9 PHASING PLAN
MI ■
L U
CU LU
O
CC
CU 0
ca W
Z
W
a:O
Q.
FILE N0. 00633
Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
00
0
o
ti
O
m
Q
O
p
v
V
FILE N0. 00633
Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
0
00
I
I
���� ROAD
h DUNDAS -
I
�. x0 �)
10 D.I.P.10 01
00
AN MH
_� �� 9 ���; o h END OF I 960 RIM RIM ELEV.=960.04
I 1' o _ c6 0 _ 6' �, p�' CULVERT I
SAN MH h1 �g6 c I = N G �,`° BURIED 960.0 �i 959.90 INV.- ELF .=942.8
RIM ELEV.=961.96 �� 961.11 �' SILT FENCE •0.66 cpl'� C° -' '< P -° ,)( ' - - ��- )< - 959.79
INV. ELEV.=943.7 °� _ �\ �r 1 ��
- _959- - � - - - - -f - SILT FENCE
CI __ _ -� o I i X 95,.,, I
-�--
_L -960- c- �_
--96 -- 959.2X X 5) _ 959.3 -_T--T - cv+-
,(� 959.7. 111:5i -T T T + --_TT�4 RISER
960.6 X- /J�%C-o;-T --rr-_V
T T T T _S-g�jg�TI T T-"T.F960�-
JJ i7 fes
------ --- �----_yb"1-------------�i`,�`L� ---0-961-------- �-�
- - -o - -962- - - - 961.9 �`° - X ---- X ----- X 961.5
962.1-�4---- -_- - - - -
X 962.9 ---------- -
r�----------- 962.5 �. 962.4
24" CMP
'"UTILITY CULVERT
,% x-963__ EASEMENT _ EXISTING -- >
,�- DRI VEWAY X 963.0
962.8X Q 4\ X 962.9 ACCESS TO X 962.5 X' o I
1962.9 \'---MOW REMOVE EXI STI NG - PUBLIC STREET 962'3
LINE CULVERT m II
o' = I
Q � I
SILT FENCE X962.2 SILT FENCE
_--� � I
\I X 963.5
o X962.2 _----------� t \ \
w X 961.9 X61.9 1
�\ � Y 962.5 �962 Oro 1\ I\ \
963.1 X) 1 o f \ ` X 964.2
X 96'
\ I- -� X 961.3
\I \ X 961.9 �0�� 962.0 N \
M 0 W \\
_ --LINE 1 c \\
I m
963.7 X96 .5 X / X\961j8X 963.7
\ \
964.3 I I
to
1 P I rn 1 X 961.2
X >1 962.5 1 X 961.7
MOW --_ I \\ I 960.9 I g63\�g6Q J
LINE
I iMOW I I I 1
0 0 I I nc, 7 X961 0 X 961.0
EXISTING VEGITATION ,' LINE I ► I
x'962.0TO BE REMOVED ��� ���96 g 0.6T 1 1, 67)
� X 963.9
964.5 X I 1 �� . I/1 X 960.1 i X 96,E
SILT FENCEI
.---WOOD FENCE w I II
964.4 ' CORNER + \- / o' I 0
^962.5 ON LOT LINE X 961.7 I 0 1 I
I \ X961.5 ( o
X 960.4 I I ��
1 1 \ \ w 11
�\ \\ �J11 X 960.7 960.5- 0 I X95.611 \I IIX 0 X 963.8
Qo I
I / \ ` 1 FO•
I \ \ �," X 5.51 I 6�
X 962.3 \ 1 X959.4 ��- I X 963.8
ra
961.4 % 961.4 I --,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + -
I I 0 0 -_ � \
I a I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
I I CONCRETE I 59.0 X
I SURFACE I 0 I\ \ \ \
963.4X 1/X 962.7, I (APPROX.) I I I\\ \ \ \
° ° °
.961 3 960.9 I II \\ \ \ \X 962.4
CHAINLINK ---�^ 962.5 ) X 961.8 961.2 / I I I \
FENCE + \-��
ON LOT LINE. /
SILT FENCE m X 960.5
\ 960.91 \ 0
REMOVE CONCRETE X\ I
SILT FENCE �,- // PAVEMENT \ 0 1 1\1 1
I 0
/ 1 X 160.41coo
I
_
X 961.8 X 961.5 X 960.9 --� - 5.1 t \- u I
� -
X 962.6 ��� 1 �\
I
1� \\ 960.8 �' \ \ -961--
0
1 \ EXISTING FENCE ON
EXISTING FENCE ON
\ � � � � \ � �' I ,.. \ ADJACENT PROPERTIES
i i
ADJACENT PROPERTIES - - �� \9s2, \ \ I \I TO REMAIN
TO REMAIN \ � - (0 961.4 X X 961.3 0 9 I .4 �
O
962.5 X 962.5 CONCRETE a 0 \\ \
��Q \ SURFACE
X 959.9
(APPROX.)
I�X961.0 �
\ 961.3
\ 0 I
\ a I
\
X 962.7 1 I 0 I 5.2 +\-
X 962.3 1\ X 961.3 --� � I
CHAINLINK X 962.3 BROKEN \ a 0 SILT FENCE
FENCE +\- CONCRETE REMOVE CONCRETE II X 960.7
0.5 FT. WEST PIECE° 0 1
OF LOT LINE. PAVEMENT
� I
I
SILT FENCE �\\ 961.5 0 1
REMOVE GARDEN
PLOTS AND X 61. - yn 1 1 X 960.6
/
SHRUBS/TREES I
0
-. 962.5 X 96 .4 I /-MOW 1
I :-�- +.� LINE j
962.6X CONCRETE I + + + + 0
962.9 SURFACE I i ;`+ +++++++ �--- - I
X+++++++.++++ -- I
(APPROX.) I i1+++++++� +++� `��++++++'I.',
2.6 r -MOW i ; + + + c. + , , + + + +, 0 LANDSCAPE
�I \ �i� _ ;� a _ ►° �,_ �962. i LINE i »+;++'�++++{`++c�'�'OF �;+ --EDGING/MULCH
}+ + ��++++ +� - ++++ N +\ ; 6\ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +
i% 6ti BROKEN MOW ��' ` �� \ 1+++++++. ++ ;+++++++I+a.,9---
9\-
,� o, 62.2X- 4++++ ,+++++;W1
X CONCRETE LINE - -9 +C+961.8 _t 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
967.2 `,\\ PIECE / ,-1----= 62��;:+ ++% E A �9
I
-A \o M 0 W ESD-_ �'A R E A -- � ' A R '�� 96�' ---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
1\i ----------------------- ,-T-r---- ---------,--�C 962.3 CD 1 I
-963- i-+-++-+-++++++++++......+++++++++++ p I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- } +++++++++++++
+ + + + + + + + + + + + ++- + + + + + + + + + + E
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER--. II ^��° UTILITY- ++++++++++++++++++++++++GARDEN+++�+�+++++++++++++f M 0 W \� I �- N 89°14'00" E
�`° EASEMENTi++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + +++++++++++/++++++ + + + . 961.8
N 89°14 00 E X------- -- �- j - _ + + + + +X6 + +_++ f ----------------------X--- ------ 1B99.53-----
+ --------
62
--�,` - -- 0 C ;++++++ + 299.81 N 89°14'00" E+}++++++" 962.6 �o_,----------- - ---- i -
1899
964.2X ,\ = `- _ o==-±;-- - �� 962.5 - �0::=_, ----------------
-------------------_-� --- .. / �� 961.3
_ �_ ------ 963.7 oo a¢6�- �p0y _ - - - - - - - - 00000
-st- 961-�`e' SHED \962--- -' -- `? -"66
- - - - = SILT FENCE \E -- )r
- -LINE " �7r - - \\�`I` TCC 8.96 - �' _ - - - - _ _ ; X 961._696 1
b V - - -�
�r - ,= y P� _ _ _ - = '� �� 1 --- --�_--X960.2
��.. S X I I, - - 960
Goho' X \9,5 �``� STOP 960.5 I --TEL. LANDSCAPE
__X X \ ; RISER EDGING/MULCH
LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROA h�� 'r�CB ',
�h EDGING ROCK °' �LEV.=958 16_ _ ---_SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL - - -
/ PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
& SHRUBS EXISTING TREES AT TOP SAN MH X 1 I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS
OF BERM ON ADJACENT _ - - - _ ELEV�958.59 -- . 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470)
PROPERTIES TO REMAIN I �,
ctt
I �� � A I S F__ r- N I I S A n hI I S I
Report -Engineering Properties (MN)
Map unit symbol and Pct. of Hydrolo Depth
soil name map gic
unit group
406 -Dorset sandy
loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
Dorset 80 B
In
0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
DEMOLITION NOTES
1. Install perimeter sediment controls as soon as possible during clear and grub
operations. See Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan.
2. Provide air quality control measures at the request of the Engineer or City
Representatives. Take necessary measures to keep dust levels to a minimum.
Provide sweeping of adjacent paving as needed, or as required by the City
Engineer.
3. Locate and protect all utility lines prior to and during demolition. Utility locations
shown are based on best available information and are not guaranteed. Contact
private utility service for disconnection and removal.
4. Remove or relocate all existing site features that interfere with the proposed
construction.
5. Protect existing site features that are to remain during construction. Replace
anything damaged with new construction.
6. Pavement shall be saw cut at limits of removal unless noted otherwise. Do not
impede existing traffic circulation to adjacent businesses or streets.
7. Sufficient topsoil shall be stockpiled to allow for the replacement of 6" of
topsoil in disturbed areas to be re-vegitated.
8. All construction and post -construction parking shall be on-site. At no time
shall parking, loading, or unloading be allowed on public streets.
9. Storage of materials or equipment shall not be allowed within public
Right -of -Way and shall be maintained on site within project boundaries.
Engineering Properties (MN) -Wright County, Minnesota
USDA texture Classification Fragments
Unified AASHTO >10 3-10
inches inches
I Pct Pct
0-11 Sandy loam, fine
SC -SM,
sandy loam, loam
Sc
11-20 Loam, sandy loam,
SC -SM
coarse sandy
loam
W
'N
20-38 Gravelly coarse
SW -SM
sand, gravelly
0
sand, very
gravelly coarse
CC
sand, gravelly
Q)
loamy sand
a
38-79 Gravelly coarse
SW -SM
sand, gravelly
rfta
sand, very
gravelly coarse
Z
W
sand, gravelly
Z
loamy sand
Data Source Information
A-2, A-4
Percentage passing sieve number- Liquid Plasticit
limit y index
4 10 40 200
Pct
90-100 78-100 57-88 27-50 0-31 NP -10
A-6, 0 0 91-100 79-100 54-83 24-45 0-31 NP -11
A-2-4,
A-4
A -1-b, A-1 0 0-2 79-92 54-77 24-41 5-15 0-0 NP
A -1-b, A-1 0 0-2 80-93 56-78 24-42 5-15 0-0 NP
0�4
�m
L
CU
U
CL
W
'N
0
"Noft
CC
10
Q)
a
to
.coNo"
Lft
rfta
0
'~
Co
Z
W
Z
W
C
w
NOR"
O
0
Q.
Q
�V
�1•+
�
r
O
UJ
0M0
=
2
0
00
0
N11
o m W W
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN FILE NO. 00633
C1 SITE PLAN
C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
- -� - - - - - - C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C 7
C8 DETAILS
C9 PHASING PLAN Existing Conditions
and Removals Plan
CHIMNEY 5FN.5 I.1NrE1MCAL OR •EYR1wkr
rBETEx OR AwRa1Ly Eaara
ST.MYN 11wwI.E
FRAME ANo COVER
LAOa,eID L1EI.IEpN FTPE ARp
L sumC1 swt er A.
ROM-SHRuxwO LA41T
wa MAwHaLE6 � � _��
ANWa Dw aA} Wr CIA
W1 .• - NW t�•
e r
11RRNT.E SF.C,p1N ro BE
Am c-A7a d.ss x Fil -
IA�F[SS "A •y -
.r aw-
uSE 1I-2 GOTTA FOR
AM wAA10LE JOFn^
OCKWVTON
sK
waD i
COHKCTCH PIE i0 Nu]elalE
" weuR,c
µ01C N' ® - -
� -a• 1w
PAEGSi eorrcM seararN � =;! s,' - ` •%� �'�
,ITR 1Y•ERr - --
e5 AT 12' OC VCH WAY
STANDARD MANHOLE FOR
SANITARY SEWER
NOTES,1a nRc
0 Mw10LE SRPS SNML 6[ Garr HLBN N MA INOOB PS -F -or
r p ' �; .I LKeA•orulan TD Au oslw REmAATora
® F DROP a GIMATER THAN N• F101P. M pyTSCE DROP.
Title:
Standard Plate Library Manhole
City of Monticello Data: 03-05 Plate No.
Standard Sanitary
Revrsed:03-15 3001
POINT ]ANiry
LYY
9TAKT
w YOPa F IPM J
5• TO ]' Ol AST ROLL EIELOSEO IH
PL T[C DR FXvNIER WITI%
TYPE 2r STOROLL DITCH CHECK
DISE aF RDx+. rFKED AREAS
K 2' x ,e- tONO 1KIORM 5tN AT
1 �7 SPACPIC W IWy. STMH S aE
PaE�.FsT
1504ryE
ANANIOE xcTIDFa
ORnEN TNROOaq THE BACK war M THE
a'aDRaa AT AM ANGLE NX .s oEulEcs N.n1
concentroted, place sod stips
YHr NOP a na srrrc rEMOEM
E[wGAL
. a P,-
PROtyE e• TO O- Di F'MBEfAFENT OE
W wwglc
N,.
FL ax
0.
PV-;fl[1E AND
Although pegging of sod is not specifically required it is understood that the
�I• LI' E1IEa1FNT [CPTH
B30ROLL STAKING
OET41L
r CAST -DI -PLACE
y
TRIe:
NINIMM OP 2'
NOTE -
City Of Monticello
WHEN 1KGK THAN I
(BRICK OR &ALK] N. -OWED ONLY IFAPPROVED
8'1 CNCIREER
BIORDLVCOpOST LOD IS
`
NEEDED, DVERLAP ENDS A
AND PIPE CONNECTION
MNNIKM OF 6° AND STAKE
g
E' A'- e•
r l
Title:
Bio Lag Staking
St Godard Plate Library
Straw or Wood Sia Roll
City of Monticello
I
DIAMETER REQUIRM_
Dote: o3 -Q8 Plate No.
MWHDLE STEPS 5HHJ. BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS
Revised: 6009
(BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REQU1LATNDHS
03-15
W WV WI' 1G11'1G 1G1G11A VWVV
GRASS TURF
SEEDING AS
APPROPRIATE FOR
BASIN
FOR COMPLETE TYPE A" QW gfUlON
MA DUE SER UMNED AAM Mr. w-
R"NOR" n R IIf'RID). 4BOM, F4 PVF:
SOPPORr >8 RFAaRED,
Title:
Outside Drop Section Far
ndarPlate Library Sanitary Manhole
City of Monticello polo: Plata No.
03-04 I
A�d
_� Wee&03-15 3002
Where the flow of water is
sheeting, place sad strips
perpendicular Lo the direction
of water flow.
SHINGLING SOD OF
PaE�.FsT
1504ryE
ANANIOE xcTIDFa
uuc"" Rp. TEE
concentroted, place sod stips
OK L9C,H p'�
bP w LYu !Y
or Ra
porotlel to the direction of
OVERLAPPING SOD
W wwglc
NOTE:
0.
PV-;fl[1E AND
Although pegging of sod is not specifically required it is understood that the
- ; IMT AN4 SIX5
repair ar replacement of sod which becomes displaced or damaged due to lack of
b
r CAST -DI -PLACE
y
TRIe:
"MARIE RHEA
Sod Placement
City Of Monticello
Title:
Outside Drop Section Far
ndarPlate Library Sanitary Manhole
City of Monticello polo: Plata No.
03-04 I
A�d
_� Wee&03-15 3002
Where the flow of water is
sheeting, place sad strips
perpendicular Lo the direction
of water flow.
SHINGLING SOD OF
s 3:1 MAX-�
SIDE SLOPE
WIDTH VARIES
Where the flow of water is
v
concentroted, place sod stips
STANDARD FP.wE & COYER,.
porotlel to the direction of
OVERLAPPING SOD
water [law.
NOTE:
TYPE 3
Although pegging of sod is not specifically required it is understood that the
contractor well be responsible for the successful establishment a[ the sod including
repair ar replacement of sod which becomes displaced or damaged due to lack of
protection or proper care-
r CAST -DI -PLACE
ASTM C 478 CONCRETE RPE. SEE WDOT STANDARD
PLATE SDW (wD TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP
TRIe:
Standard Plate Library
Sod Placement
City Of Monticello
Date:03-07 Plate No.
(BRICK OR &ALK] N. -OWED ONLY IFAPPROVED
8'1 CNCIREER
66
`
ReYieed=03-15 6010
s 3:1 MAX-�
SIDE SLOPE
WIDTH VARIES
II ` I I I II
I
I
I I II I II I I II
UNDISTURBED AND/OR J
UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOIL
>_s 3:1 MAX
SIDE SLOPE
C C4511%
ADJUST NO RINGS
v
41 ON - 12• MAX
STANDARD FP.wE & COYER,.
STRAW
to
MULCH
rw DEn,As
TYPE 3
r
J FOR CER RIUIRFM
II ` I I I II
I
I
I I II I II I I II
UNDISTURBED AND/OR J
UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOIL
>_s 3:1 MAX
SIDE SLOPE
C C4511%
ADJUST NO RINGS
OVERFLOW M 31 OF
41 ON - 12• MAX
STANDARD FP.wE & COYER,.
e•
&MMN
SEE RLATI 10011
T ROADWAY SURFACE
rw DEn,As
SEE MDOSTANDARD PLATE 4020
11=III=III=1
J FOR CER RIUIRFM
'-•: �:•.:: •. ::
,.:-,.MALL CONSTRUC•TON SILaI BE CLASS II
-RECO PIPE, Exerm 48- DN MAY BE
r CAST -DI -PLACE
ASTM C 478 CONCRETE RPE. SEE WDOT STANDARD
PLATE SDW (wD TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP
COMOREIE
- OR 60TTCW OF TRK °ACTION]- CAST -IN-PLACE
S �• �' t0 10'
CONCRETE r1R MASON, CONSTR%CTD N
OVERFLOW A' TOP OF
FETER ASSEMBLY
(BRICK OR &ALK] N. -OWED ONLY IFAPPROVED
8'1 CNCIREER
66
CONCRETE f]OGHQUISE REgIRFIED ON
1UT511E AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE
3" GALVANIZED STEEL POLE
AND PIPE CONNECTION
,n 'I
� STRITCiuRE,
g
E' A'- e•
B' POURED CONCRETE BASE. FOR ALTERAATE PRECAST CONCRETE
BASE. 59E MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY CU METER Mo
2• RAAEO AREA TO FIT REOURED DIAWETER
_- �Ua
O1 REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HENT AND
I
DIAMETER REQUIRM_
PFORARI ruFO WH
MWHDLE STEPS 5HHJ. BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS
-I -PF
(BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REQU1LATNDHS
Mo SPACED 18' W.
MIR pROTECFNE XAnIG As
wWLFACnIREO NO' ADAPTOR IAO.
® MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT
"
fl EOIJUALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH
MAY BE USED
LIFNKaLE�
RLA$IEIgD OR
CATCH ExIER"
(� GENERAL OIHENSIONS FOR CONCRETE. APPLY
TO BRIG[ AND CONCRETE MASONRY UWT
BASION
DIA
CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT As NOTED.
SEWER BECK (MrZOT SPEC 35161 OLOC%
12 MWIAIUW FOR PRECAST, S BRICKS OR
MRSORRr CONSTRUCTION
T BLOCK wimmuM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION
1 �lI
` WTE YyyE TEE
�
(T REo6OACEMENT AS PER MIDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60.
FR01x 1E xmw T Nm
rill:
Standard Manhole for
landard Plate Library
AL
Storm Server
City of Monticello
Date: Plate No,
03-Q5
Pcws rRDu rkLc
r o TWAANO
4001
R xYlsad:
03-15
11Pa. ■
40 9 s ■ ■
■■ ■40
a
.7- m .. r1TAPrEF y'p kids_ 1
o
_ ���� rI,l.wpu:fl•1xn �imm�rnla
roun�lld(b ill/sfF�EaIL�.muante He��m,e� �AT�
Erasion Control Blanket
Standard Plate Library Stapling Patterns & Installation
City of Monticello Data:43-Q8 Plate No.
Revteea:03_15 6011
t
ELV = VARIES
TOP BASIN ELV = 959.00
I
BOTTOM BASIN ELV = 957.00
IIII III ISI �
1' DEPTH
AMMENDED SOIL MEDIUM;
SEE GENERAL NOTES ITEM 7.
TYPICAL INFILTRATION BASIN CROSS-SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
INFILTRATION BASIN GENERAL NOTES:
1) INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (IN
ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT GENERAL CONDITIONS 2573) PRIOR TO
THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OPERATION THAT MAY CAUSE
ANY SEDIMENTATION OR SILTATION AT THE SITE.
2) INSTALL STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TO PREVENT CLOGGING
OF THE STORM SEWER AND SEDIMENT LOADS TO DOWNSTREAM
STORM WATER FACILITIES OR WATERBODIES.
3) IF THE STORM WATER BMP IS BEING DESIGNED TO SERVE AS A
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN, GRADE THE BMP TO WITHIN 12"
ABOVE THE FINAL GRADE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING MATERIAL
FROM CLOGGING. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IN THE CONTRIBUTING
DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE ISSTABILIZED,
EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO FINAL GRADE AND COMPLETE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN.
4) GRADING OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED
USING LOW -IMPACT EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT
COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS. SMALL TRACKED
DOZERS AND BOBCATS WITH RUNNER TRACKS ARE RECOMMENDED.
5) EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO THE SPECIFIED DEPTH
(ELEVATION). ALL SUB MATERIAL BELOW THE SPECIFIED ELEVATION
SHALL BE LEFT UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY
THE ENGINEER.
6) IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING
OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE
REMOVED FROM THE INFILTRATION BASIN PRIOR TO INITIATING THE NEXT
STEP IN THE INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. THIS IS
ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IF THE INFILTRATION BASIN HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO
INFILTRATE STORM WATER: SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN WASHED INTO THE
INFILTRATION BASIN DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS CAN SEAL THE
PERMEABLE MATERIAL, SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY
OF THE SOILS.
7) INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE OVER -EXCAVATED TO SPECIFIED DEPTH
AND FILLED WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE OF 70%-80% SEMI -COURSE
WASHED SAND; 20%-30% MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST. ALTERNATE OPTION
IS TO IMPORT 3 INCH DEPTH MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST AND ROTO -TILL
INTO TOP 9 INCH DEPTH NATIVE SOIL PROVIDED NATIVE SOIL IS CONFIRMED
TO BE CLEAN SAND MEETING MnDOT SELECT GRANULAR SPECIFICATION AND
ALL NON-NATIVE SOILS ARE REMOVED.
8) INFILTRATION BASIN TO BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 34-181 OR
APPROVED EQUAL. SEEDING SHALL CONFORM TO MnDOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING SPECIFICATION 3876, 2005
EDITION.
9) PORTIONS OF INFILTRATION BASINS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE MULCHED
WITH CLEAN GRAIN STRAW (MnDOT TYPE 3) AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER
ACRE.
10) SEEDING AND INSTALLATION OF ANY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
NECESSARY SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS (7) DAYS OF FINAL
GRADING.
f
e 0-
L__J o Sf
C '•LL L_ r C, p b J�"•}jS� F g 4
_ .CC• N
F. w E.1iL
51 2
C' n R g w
A o g
a
A�A Ca
- a
a
a
ap
TOe:
Standard Plate Library Riprap Detail
City or Monticello_Date
= 03-05 Plate NO.
1= - 4009
Revise
EnSnNc culls
CONCRETE
ar1M.w °�l,c[
OVERFLOW M 31 OF
T
e-. a' . s' n1p •AA � ifss MVe 6'
]l``VI�CI��l (�1L-
WE CURB SOk HEIGHT
e•
&MMN
SEE RLATI 10011
F16tt
rw DEn,As
wNMCO ROAD DRIIR LO -23• HIGH FLOW
11=III=III=1
INLET PROTECTION CURD AND GUTTER MODEL
DEFLECTOR PLATE
OR Cm APPROVED Ea11AL
I
CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461
MENTION 151'• PF
EunARE .
°� °N SOI 1PE
THE CURB 80 EIGHT
FRAC eMry 1f1C [rraAED NFUGEl F1M�m cxRx,
T, �1
OVERFLOW A' TOP OF
FETER ASSEMBLY
FILTER A111MOLY
DIAMETER,
ID• Al LOW PONT
HUH -FLOW FAMIC
• FOR THE NEW 9 -3290 -VB STANDARD
CASTING. IN51ALL WMCA ROAD DRAIN
CG -3290 OR CTTY APPROVED EWAL.
Title:
Inlet Protection
Standard Plate Library Catch Basin Insert
City of Monticello Data:03 Q7 Plate No,
Revl9ed: 6004
03-15
i
A A
N 1,14 4Y
oam RIET n%AgE o d _ i
WEIPW HO. R-]OT4cure em
s -V -
PLAN
- r ca.7m Eou.R ANL 510RM 0-0 a
SHOW OM THE MAA
DLTR+EssEo N1 eE 1
IEVAIKXI CSFE DErNI
ADauSTRNG RNOS
EHGEE w 2LC.FCNYI3RT[
aMa "Troll ew.ae _ _ N-•�
Ya' FINISH
N9EIDE
4• COMOrETC MMR
Nwl�i, SECTION A -A
WR A O' TO a CONCRETE COM.AR
a's"' Tore" IHC
LASTRG TO Allo PR[C Sr SECTKw
us H 4I Le[AHREEHw vOmYEIATS SHARD fZ TWE A1ryOT fRscH H. TIE
Swe-Af.
Title:
`� Standard Plate Library Standard
Catch Basin
City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plots No.
Revlsld: 4002
fl3-15
0ro,*1 pods] MNDOT Closs CA -T5
or CA -25 Riprap Bedding
Geoteklie fabric iginal
grade g
SECSECRBI iJ SON B-8
{not to stole]
Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates
"'���rrr mss JJ •d ii7M�J original
GeateKile faprio SSEC710 -AA grade
(not 10 stole)
NOTES:
Channelize runoff to sediment Sedimen{ Trapping Device
trapping device
Ribbed a Corrugoted sleel plates
AI A
a/ �E
d x
4 i
CC -
CL
Q
to s
z
24• min.
k Slope 0Tr0y from
LAF highway
I%
5D' in.
Match Ly Or Right of Way }
Existing
Grade PLAN
TiT1e:
Commercial Gravel
Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance
City of Monticello Data: os- t 4 Plate No.
d R°"I$°d:03-15 6002
M -,Jr 4a°
PLAN
cASTFFG i0 SET 0., b• nae WET F.A AND C+ 1 -
BELOW Canal REwPON! Sao CxSTRO - NEENWIr Mot
R -DOT] -V
M111 OONC IC t �wWNNO1 DOVER ToKi° ADA
I •s I I
rLONEFEIE doa11]uSE RE �n
'H
�01RT.06 AND ONSRE aF STRUCTVRE
•Rrrrlvl A1n PIE cOM1ECTOM
L gn1FH;x}• VNtNS
6 Ort 51RHc1uR[
GT FrE
_ I
CCRCRETi CATCH a A+ uwHaE J' ,p,�.T�^
ANIO BASE 10 eE CAEIC,
TWE use OR �D EOWL ,. eA6E /o aE aROulEo t0 IbRTI A STnoM
VIM, TO ourLEr.
SECTION 1 F CO-p/ry TO nE LOGARO 'CRETA[
GFp F.Sw PRwOLES HLUINED M OREETI 6PAOE3 SMLL BE G rAY rED Oi
k[FE uxr A-C.;ICA # MIR , V.- IY P n, .00u
TSE rj•Snil� 5 W OF g R --M.
IN
N;I.Tp. 9ALI wPP•0[S LDOT[D IN DRIi><N*S AWL 1C CO UGTED R[H M
ra[MRK Top Sub rnM A i]• 40-3 OFUNI THE OAGTwC SP:L BE
NEEFaw R-Tsoe-A2.
Tale:
Catch Basin
Standard Plate Library Manhole
Cit►° or Monticello Date: 03_05 Data ND.
ReRlaed: 4003
fl3-15
rR.asl'1AAu �
CONCRETE
ar1M.w °�l,c[
e'Wa[ - ATKK ��LE56 TWIN !•
T
e-. a' . s' n1p •AA � ifss MVe 6'
]l``VI�CI��l (�1L-
AT P1 OSSOG
WXFOR
e•
SDRrXPw H -b euro
PIIST,C FAY 011 APPROYID
COWL yf
'L AJ z1,aa1 SIREIs ,' uoN
MSE AFW Y MOTH ANSE
1Kq[- w^ A1GN REAWerED FDR WSTERyWN MInF LESS THM1 S' CMiR x CRA55'1 MGS NW 6' RIRR aNOER PAtt;p A ACES
Title:
Insulation
Standard Plate Library Detail
City of Monticello Data: 03-05 Plata No,
Rmrlsed: 2004
03-15
NOTC ru 410 PER,AT .(L CrtarvAT10[ NNDAA AMC IP1RS Di 11[ IeLI A]RI rypAA.Y • 1 BE AS rpuMr 1
] 2 1 ANO pHMAY sIAu,L TAKE PVOK THE Tux Fy LawNO ExGwTTarl oFYTeMrka
' w.L LIu
AHO a,EW, x swul nincE RHE -N Or f,1E E GVATKW IE 9.fED FRcx E1[H LQx or it[ CtCww _n
ALL ala Ala pASJA,AY
I.
YE FROM CENTERLBC Oi R TO THE FROAn EDGE W vAe uNLi55 OCA NOK AR[A
EiNfAaACKS INTO tIR o1MK LAZE D< rD Ta, TFEH AHE Yr HE RRET SRu IINLLUOE ME Fuµ WIO1.1 br TAE STREET
�. LFMm MEA ANiL eE PERTpNDOyLAR ro THE CFMrEq➢E Df THE S,REET
IT s m waOE EKcautKN TCAs occas
IN I]tE anET1, AHE ENME Bn[R sAR.L er Mum Mo alm.am
CURB� LINE
E%DAVATRNN AREA
11IR.L HIO aYERLAY A
CORRuNt ROAD
SA*CLff an BASE I' FROM EXCAVATION EDGE
S\ACUI en WEAR 2' FROM !EXCAVATION EDGE
CCUBO�C) UNE
- - R.o.w - - - -
HCTC -Tia, nc OAS,- FRnrlpNs IASE ONSOM TKWE3S
GAL li TIC ros,NHG wnAF110Ai KEw COOIGE T,F[awCYS Ia'
T.[ rLaLaRIG TIAL ITE rREA fiAR1 K wu.ED AHD 06FNAv
ruu oERTF1 sandrt x elTwMars NLASE s eEpF11ED ,• ARGwD LTcwATOH mu
Fuµ OEP,H s&RoDn or 9RIIFaTus WEAR s Rpqu%p i' M01I10 rxavf NON Earl
1' 1' en WEAR COURSE
BR BASE COURSE
1'
- L7.A'S 5 -
%7-7,
'STANDARD I I=1[
959 STANDARD PROCTOR1TION APEI W DT �ES))AP RIOVED STAPES TO EY AIG UiIL -1111-III-1I
rile:
Utility Excavation in Streets
Standard Plate Library that are Less than 5 Years old
City of Monticello Date: o3-08 Plate No.
- R°RIe°d:03-15 7007
,
role:
Standard Plate Library Watermain Offset
City or Monticello Date:
03-05 Rl�e No.
J R-iseir2005
03-15 /
r
r- v OR s w D a v Calle
Prre+oBED sTORN Tc.ER
CONCRETE IKrLN OR
AT P1 OSSOG
WXFOR
HIFIAFARNOFA
&MMN
SEE RLATI 10011
MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B
rw DEn,As
.
11=III=III=1
6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL
WATFPvbr
�5
I
CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461
eI(/KOfr 11.WGEI]R
1 Tor 4ASAAAI
EunARE .
°� °N SOI 1PE
SIGN TYP @ EACH
FRAC eMry 1f1C [rraAED NFUGEl F1M�m cxRx,
T, �1
Pn�g1yE 2 TE Roes Fha11 {ETU TO
M10. RPE JOIFTS MDRI e'
_THIS
HANDICAP PARKING SPACE
OF A BFIIO SHILL EE RESIWW40
a4Ha NE RpoS
IOP
role:
Standard Plate Library Watermain Offset
City or Monticello Date:
03-05 Rl�e No.
J R-iseir2005
03-15 /
r
r- v OR s w D a v Calle
4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT
CONCRETE IKrLN OR
CO
HIFIAFARNOFA
ifAulp/S PATH ARE
PKESEM'
MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B
-I � I -III -III -III -III -III
=1 I -I I -I I -III -III
to" VKT]µ IT
1➢10A1R
11=III=III=1
6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL
x010" art IX amER iNN:
7".
m
Q
o
ro IHSMUFD oN PLW4n CORN.
CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461
eI(/KOfr 11.WGEI]R
1 Tor 4ASAAAI
EunARE .
°� °N SOI 1PE
SIGN TYP @ EACH
FRAC eMry 1f1C [rraAED NFUGEl F1M�m cxRx,
T, �1
O
_THIS
HANDICAP PARKING SPACE
uftan
IOP
3" GALVANIZED STEEL POLE
L�
2 LAKRS
g
E' A'- e•
As REQUIRED
P0.Y 0 .0
25
_- �Ua
,ER IT O' DEEP PiT
I
fi
PFORARI ruFO WH
I I °
SREL 10µE BW AOAPIpt
W Or , C,v. tK
CLERR STORE
n
MIR pROTECFNE XAnIG As
wWLFACnIREO NO' ADAPTOR IAO.
W
�•'I I. N
OR APPROyED EIX
LI[G1aW
NEGRAID
O
,L �� co
ii
a:
a
M[GkuG
1 �lI
` WTE YyyE TEE
�
�_
FR01x 1E xmw T Nm
oR WINE
TEE oR wATERuD
W
SPTC,F1CD 1'. 1 4'j
Pcws rRDu rkLc
r o TWAANO
Title:
Standard Plate Library Typical HydrantInstallation
City or Monticello Date: 03_05 Ptots No.
A - Revlsad:03 15 2001
1811
4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT
�- WHITE ON BLUE
CO
4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW
00
T
MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B
-I � I -III -III -III -III -III
=1 I -I I -I I -III -III
\ PARKING BY DISABLED
PERMIT ONLY
TTOW AWAY BLACK ON WHITE
11=III=III=1
6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL
2DNE�-
FINE UP TO $250.00 W/ 1.511 LETTERS
HANDICAP SIGNCa
m
Q
o
V
CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461
MIX No. 3Y22A FOR
W
SIGN TYP @ EACH
MANUAL PLACEMENT
O
_THIS
HANDICAP PARKING SPACE
uftan
CC
3" GALVANIZED STEEL POLE
co
CL
■ _
Lift
FINISH GRADE
f
�
I
fi
Uj
I I °
CONCRETE o
Q
Z
W
�•'I I. N
•s I I ,
O
,L �� co
ii
a:
a
"
Milli1'-0
�_
a)
(0
W
HANDICAP SIGN
co
2" BITUMINOUS WR
\ \ \ SPWEB240B MnDOTS ECURSE 2360
2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
SPNWB230B MnDOT SPEC 2360
Oo 6" CLASS V AGGREGATE BASE
MnDOT SPEC 3138
=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I
=1 I -I I -I I -III -III -III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP
-I I -I I -I 11=1 11=1 I I 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
NOTE: SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS
:.
4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT
MNDOT SPEC 2461
CO
4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW
MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B
-I � I -III -III -III -III -III
=1 I -I I -I I -III -III
-I I I
-III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP
11=III=III=1
6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL
NOTES:
m
Q
o
1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL
CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461
MIX No. 3Y22A FOR
SLIPFORM PLACEMENT
MIX No. 3Y32A FOR
MANUAL PLACEMENT
2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT
SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SPACE THE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 6'-0" O.C.
4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS
SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS
CONCRETE PAVEMENT - SIDEWALK
L :. ;• •t 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT
. •:•.. .• ,• WITH REINFORCEMENT;
SEE DETAIL
6" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW
MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B
-I � I -III -III -III -III -III -I I I
=1 I -I I -I I -III -III -III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP
11=III=III=1 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL
NOTES:
1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461
MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM PLACEMENT
MIX No. 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT
2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SPACE THE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 12'-0" O.C.
4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS
CONCRETE PAVEMENT - HEAVY DUTY
INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
C1 SITE PLAN
C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
C8 DETAILS
C9 PHASING PLAN
a
t; o
00
L•2` 1 I + N0)
it N '� 1 U) to N
C C I p to O E
° c �to1 0
V L O Z WA.,
I 7� O�-6
"oo tiw lox 1 0
v4i E ai m ca o `0
L O O � W l� l U� �N U
c
oA c ~ IW°CLai3
4,�: ti I C:
00
° V I 0 0 �
•E.. a, v 4+ 3 I
4-
J
-1.. V)
�.
Q� O
t y O N O
13 w O a
2
O
N
CO
rw
V
toto
00
O
�
a:
m
Q
o
f -
m
W
v
v
Z
w
CJ
fi
O
r
Q
Z
CL
a
t; o
00
L•2` 1 I + N0)
it N '� 1 U) to N
C C I p to O E
° c �to1 0
V L O Z WA.,
I 7� O�-6
"oo tiw lox 1 0
v4i E ai m ca o `0
L O O � W l� l U� �N U
c
oA c ~ IW°CLai3
4,�: ti I C:
00
° V I 0 0 �
•E.. a, v 4+ 3 I
4-
J
-1.. V)
�.
Q� O
t y O N O
13 w O a
2
O
FILE NO. 00633
•
Details
V
CIO
00
O
O
ti
0
m
Q
o
m
W
a
m
W
v
v
FILE NO. 00633
•
Details
oo0
I
1
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
SAN MH
RIM ELEV.=961.96 ��h1
INV. ELEV.=943.7
-961-`
960.6 Xj.Op
962.1 X_ - -
M
1
1 '
I
D U N DAS
���� ROAD
1
I
X - 1
10 D.I.P.
� O
\ 15 R. C. P-00
' ;� �N MH
= �``� ; /960 RIM ELEV.=960.04
�� � 960.0V1,__ i' & 959.90 INV. ELF�V.=942.8
961_11 960.66 `� 960 - - )k-,060- 960 °so* ( -°100 959.79
_ _ r _
-960- - - - - ` c--_=`8 °��9»-n, 9 _ X958.6
959 x I X 1 - - _ (X 959.31-
95_9.2 T " 6o�9s+_ RISER
959.7. - T T T T T -, T �9� ^ - 960 T� - °'o /� ° - - -
------- �3�'., X -+961960
1----yb1------------ __ ---------- - »-» ---
962- '==y�----'\1-�0----- ---?°01.5--��' X961.5
_ 962 _
V x - - - -so jaIv I(:g � I1
9t o.4 'po
`p �0 962 eryk° rotikp s6 96�o
U o aEASF ! 9 62
>
i �CLl a
I
963.0
X X63.r- I . K 9�9 - I 62.962.8 Q ��4OOc 11
oI-?�nlI "' lI------ - 963 ----_-_
co
T a
_
Cr -
I1 109
-�I 109 I - -00 - 4-
9,, 1.2
-91.'.2 ACCESS DRIVE AND
ACCESS DRIVE AND I ti`h 1' - _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - I I g62151# \ ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO
ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO 0 f961 L! 62.2 �0p- f I I! BE INSTALLED AS PART OF
BE INSTALLED AS PART OF w h i 96ti 1 BUILDING 962/ ab BUILDING B I 'I 61.9 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS
PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS 9 x;2,5
6, 9 7 6, 9 76 SF I I I I I I \
I; F I
963.1 X) o f I _1 11 I ; \ / X 964.2
• FFE=963.50
\� =,l 0 1 \ w x 96' 6,
/-'-FFE=963_
I _x I T i X 61
\ 962 ; \ X 961.9 962.0 ' %3 \ \
I so'. u rn \
1 \ v u O-o-O"o"O"o'"O'"O�O O I
`'O'''O
0-0,0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 N
� `- IVOOOODO�o�o�ODO�ODO000fb00 O O,O�O„O_O_O_o o r 170
, O � I
I (��--LI�JE' 9ss \ 1 10I 1 p I �j o � \
X
co
�6
2 r o 6 00 - - �ryp 96, ° X\961j8X 963.7
963.7 / �, I• o
96.5x' � .-.-.- 9-�-�-.-.-.- 1�
I "{
\ 1 \ \
I 1 ° I / 6� '
964.3 I -,-- ,- 00,
901
1
ISI I 1 x 0 1_�oO'
g I - ��1 \ 9�7 i. I I u u 0 0= "0'`0;0-o I
6 , v 060-0- -o o-o"o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
u v o- -a-o-0"0"0"0"0"0"0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
X ovovou.0000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0'0_19 0 0 0 0 tg6 I I \
40000000000 ►+ 960.9
MOW --_ 1 962s1,% \ I +I I �, I IX 1963 Ix96��
00
LINE
I iI \ r---___ I 11 I \ 1 M0w1 I I 1
(,oCO I 1 11 I 1.7 //X961.0 Ix �1• \1� LINE I I I \�
I/-��� BUILDING D II I I
I 1 BUILDING C - 6,976 SF I '�6��� X961 X 960.6 I 11 w x X 963.9
964.5 I I 16ti`o 1' / 6 9 76 SFz'\O ', 1 X 960. 96
X I I *9 I I �8
962y -i /
I1 •---wo F
_NCE FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 n I I
I \
1 1 1111 I r, Q 1 I I
964.4 �r'1 C0 �F + \- / 109 I 11 I °� 1 I CO II
\ -9 )12.;�ON _o7 LINE 109 - �1 Q i I
1 X96' .5 "�
n - -- -- --- -- .:-___ '_- 66_6 6--_-=-_-= =\ 1F L G 4==-= - -9� I I 1 I I I I x o
- -963-- - -------6666-- 6666 96r J 963 --- 96, II o X95.61
° X 963.8
-- - - r - -- - 966 5' oC I \ I
- II ro I I
+ I\'100
160 �,9 • ; 0 1 3 11 .\ lO \ 1 \ �p �yo - J �;1 I I
I / 11 • ` \ ''9 °O \wo'6 Itilt
r.2 F�' 1
`o % s? � . 9 - ry0 �o \ �o - 96, I+! �'` C X 5.51
11 - yo 6� 6ti 9 g2 20 X I 9
I
62.31 °0 qb�' �9 `' I 0959.4 �� X 963.8
9 lI 962 yo
- ••�,� =� I ICHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
• o. \ 196ti°I 1I I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
I I1 I 0 \ \
1 �
11 • 11 �lO \ \ I 911 59.0\ \\ \ \ \
963.4X X 962.7' 9 0" 196-----------------6666-- ----�\ -- 963 66 66-6666-- 6666--=o 66 66--6666-_ _ --- 963°� I II I. I I \\ \\\\
g2 n LOp 6Ni 1 - - 11-00,
T 1 ■
a
II
//1 I 111 109 X 961.3 I I I I \\ \ \\ \X 962.4
I . ;; 1 109
61.L / Q`1�• I I \
,• I o I \
CHAINLINK ---�^ 912 111 X 961.8
FENCE +\- 1 II /' /� _�� // I �11
I I
ON LOT LINE. I,0 -11 / \' / I 1'19601 til it = 0 \ \ \\ OX 960.5
Aro I It _
BUILDING E
��'� BUILDING F
d-
11 I 962°I„ Nt- X 958.6
11 1 �� 11 CO
6,976 SF
6,9 76 SF I -
'
FFE=963.x960.4
50
FFE=9\
11 63
_ ; 1
962.5014`1�61.X 961.5 -� x 9:x.9
1v u u o 0 0 080-
0
0
( 1 �� ., u u o- o`�"o"o"o'"o"'0 0 0 0 �°o 0100 0_0_0_0.0
X 962.6 ; \ u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0''0' 0"0° 00000000000000' 0' 0 0 0 0 0� 4 0 0 0
\-9 1
o I 1 \ 1 X�uo; .8 , i �M 1 1_ I 1 X 958.7
1 _ I e6 y
I
O 96, I 1
1 s6�9T �ti° - °6ti 06"'� / '�0 " 0 ACCESS DRIVE AND
° - 06 9� q 11 ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO
ACCESS DRIVE AND � -*V - - I `<-� rn i
ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO - ] BE INSTALLED AS PART OF
1 96'0 - g6� I _ g6� I II PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS
BE INSTALLED AS PART OF 1 / / \' 961.4 x X 961.3 o =1 96.4 \
PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS \; ov - I T
Gpl
n.
0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
PROJECT PHASING TIMELINE
PHASE 1 2017-2018
PHASE 2 2018-2019
PHASE 3 2020-2021
PHASE 4 2022-2023
MARKET CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN
MODIFICATION OF PHASING TIMELINE
AND PHASING OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS
^, v u o o6060 -o o g I
.. u u
o, 4000-0-0- 0"0000 000000 6y 1
u u-o-o-o•'o"o"o 0 0"0 0 0 0 0 0 0
v u-0'0`0-0- 00-"0"0"0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o
1 00000000�0„0„0„0„01'0 _ o_ o o '•Oj = 1 /
1 962s1 , \X 959.9
X_961.0 1
I X961.3 1C14
II I1 \ 1 a 0 I
I
X 962.7 96ti`y �� BUILDING G ��� \\ BUILDING H
ID
1 = bry,11
o
} \ 6, 9 76 SF x 96n 9 -- 5. P + \-
11 96��I1' 6, 976 SF „ I
11 , < \ I 11 I 11
1 : 0
CHAINLINK --� 1
1962.3 1, 1
\\ FFE963.50 I1I /
FENCE +\- ;� FFE=963. \ = r I I X 960.7
0.5 FT. WEST
OF LOT LINE. 1 109 109 ;s' 1 0 1
13 0 I I
n
1 I1 I9
�
\ 96I 3----- A-6- N
o
62.30' - -6_666- s -66-r- - co963
I
rn
.6
101Z` 1-1 ' %�g6, •$O', - 1.1 X 960.6
:. I O - ! i
ssiso ,. 1 96ti. \96ti 951.7 6ti� o - ;; /
11 _ 9.962 � , I
%9 5 / \ ?� ° X962.4 I s1 „
/ 6h ° i I 26666-� I 63, �� I
6666
962.6X °6�. 962 °b��o I ``1��6666-----------
962
962.9x 90 _ 6666 6666- 96 - _ _- _ 6666-- ---- 6.666----- � g62 -ter.-.-- -- ------
o
/ --'''- 962 J`�� .961
961 960 -- �� F IZ 960 959 958 0 LANDSCAPE
t 959 958 \ 957 -EDGING/MULCH
957 O 1 \ 1 01 Q
9s, �� -' / \ ,g6� ; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
�� `(1 I� -0 _ _ _ - _ / / 962.2 96 / _ °' \ `I - ' 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
° / �-�-_ / X--__ X961.8
967.2 `,\\ / _� �� 9
i\�\ u aFP 3 - -' \\ r 957' 096' I ---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 1Ii ' - 958 957 ` �' _ - - 959 958 1 /4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER 959 .960 bbl
N 89°14'00" E \ c 960 X 96,T4 -1899 5 E
_ 961-----6666-- �- -x---
� X- 6666-- 961 -----r- ----------------6666-- -- _6666-- 6 ------------
------
------ -; 6666 --- 6666-- ------3123.56-- -' ,\ -- 962 ---2yy 81 N �,y f�Uu E - y9.? �0-,1 -
li 1899
--- 964.2x 963-- _ -------------------------
_ -0 962.5 r
---------------�_ ,, -�-� C? // 961.3
963.7 �� o -&- "�s�Q = _ �� _ _ - - _ - - - _961- / 1 00000 `S��
Mow_, o �°� R -__ - ----- - �,- �9s2__-�� INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS:
- a°��4? - - �� SHED
- - LINE - �, i�--960- SQA\�� - 4C 958.96 = M' _ _ - - _ ` �� _ _ 1 X 961.6 961-f-
-- 1 --- --�_--X960.2
\\\959 ah�vSTOP 960.5X; -L60- ANDSCAPE CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN
--TEL.
�G x _x x \ RISER EDGING/MULCH C2 GITE PLAN
RADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
�co LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD h�� --CCB FL ', _ _ _ _ _
�h EDGING/ROCK °' �LEV.=958.16_ - _-=SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL � r- - - - - - -r -
& SHRUBS \ PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN
SAN MH x I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN
ELEV.=958.59--. 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
------
-------I� \
� I I I I I I C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN
Ga I I I I I I I C8 DETAILS
I I/ F__I n I I F__n F_ -)A ,h �` 11- �` _T_n _T_ F_ �` �h� n I I n n I -`i I S I /� N I I ► I I C 9 PHASING PLAN
� w �
ct kr)
W 0 kr) o�
M
O 0
cn
ct ct
W ct
0�4
cu Lu
CL ' N
O co w
"Nom CC 10cv)
Q
•co a O t
to cn
Lft a 1-Zm•+ ZZ z g
W Ld
Zia -
w 0 Q)
W c _O __j z
O O o=
•- CL
•� CL O
Z r ° o
MOM
co W CL
o =
^^
''
v,
a
o
co
may'
��lo �0E
° c CW` Lj co Lo I o
V L O Z W I OLO c: -6
Its 4 y p W Ico 0
m
oEo `a°i�V)0U�U c ~ w�+ ai3
o��
4 j ~ i p c 3
o� 0
J O
U O O D
IZ
L Q ra
X, " o b
2
0
FILE N0. 00633
C9
Phasinq Plan
O
O
0
DO
o
a
v
FILE N0. 00633
C9
Phasinq Plan
TRUSS BRNG.
ELEV. 109'-0"
TRUSS BRNG.
ELEV. 116'-O"
STEEL SIDING COLOR "A'
TRUSS BRN�.
ELEV. 109'- "
CORNER TRIM
FIN. FLOOR
ELEV. 100'-0"
CULTURED STONE
PROVIDED ON NOi
OF NORTH BUIDINC
SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH
BUILDINGS ONLY
WOOD POST W/
METAL WRAP
3C,4LE: 1/8" = 1'-O"
TRUSS BRNG.
ELEV. 116'-O"
EEL SIDING COLOR "A"
CORNER TRIM
STEEL SIDING COLOR "B"
FIN. FLOOR
ELEV. 100'-O"
TRUSS BRNG.
ELEV. 116'-O"
STEEL SIDING COLOR "f
CORNER TRIM
STEEL SIDING COLOR "B"
,AFIN. FLOOR
ELEV. 100'-0"
METAL WRAP j C ,4 L: I/ 8 = I'— V
,JbTRUSS BRNG.
ELEV. 116'-O"
STEEL SIDING COLOR "
CORNER TRIM
STEEL SIDING COLOR "B"
�JhFIN. FLOOR
ELEV. 100'-0"
SCALE: 1/8" = I' -U"
METAL WRAP
TRUSS BRNG.
ELEV. 109'-O"
F�E,4R ELEV/4T10N
SC,4LE: 1/8" = 1'-O"
fv �
I.I.I
N
w
ZH
GJ
s
s
z
CK
m 0 m
w
F ro,leat No.
°2 1,101,91
0
C Iasue Dzte
?-??
J
C oc iment S t:
V????
0
w
0
J
d
TRUSS BRNG.
ELEV. 116'-0"
STEEL SIDING COLOR "A"
TRUSS BRNG.
ELEV. 109'-0"
CORNER TRIM
10•
I
AFIN. FLOOR
ELEV. 100'-0"
CULTURED STONE
PROVIDED ON NORTH WALL
OF NORTH BUIDINGS AND
SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH
BUILDINGS ONLY
TRUSS BRN�
ELEV. 116'-
-- 2
1:2 12
STEEL SHAKE
SIDING
WOOD POST W/
METAL WRAP
TRUSS BRNG.
ELEV. 116'-0"
FfP,,0 NT ELE\/�
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
12
/
TION
�i STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A"
TRUSS BRNGG,-NP�I
ELEV. 109'-
b
------- CORNER TRIM CORNER TRIM
,,—STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" STEEL SIDING COLOR "B"
FIN. FLOOR FIN. FLOOR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------
------------- ------
ELEV. 100'-0" ELEV. 100'-0"
SIEDE ELEVATION SIIDE ELEV74TION
WOOD
POST
SCALE: 1/8„ , „ „ , = I O SCALE: 1/8 = 1'-0”
„
4::
TRUSS BRNG.
ELEV. 116'-0" J
STEEL SIDING COLOR "A"
}
CORNER TRIM i
STEEL SIDING COLOR "B"
q
FIN. FLOOR
ELEV. 100'-0"
_=
awi
WOOD POST W/
METAL WRAP
RE,,4R ELE\/�TI0N
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
4:1:
TRUSS BRNG
ELEV. 109'-
■ 0 ■
z
s
U
z
rn,
i�Ti •7R����
I'10i9
0
C Issue Otte;
w ??-;?-??
C oc ime nt S t:
■ ■
�i
J_
r
�
Z
--I
■ 0 ■
z
s
U
z
rn,
i�Ti •7R����
I'10i9
0
C Issue Otte;
w ??-;?-??
C oc ime nt S t:
■ ■
�i
109'-01,
61_01; 2,_3„ 12,_6„ 3,_3„ 61_01, 6,_O„ 6,_O„ 2,_9„ 12,_6„ 2,_9„ 3,_311 12,_6„ 2'-3" 6'-O" 6'-O" 6'-6"
®EM�®
3070
I mmm
mmm
3070 3070 INSUL. U L ®■®
- - INSUL. - - - INSUL. - - - STEEL J
x I IXI I F #� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Iw I • Ix] 1 Ixl x Ixl I I #� IXI I I )CI I I Iw Ixl 1XI �F ° _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �lxl 1XI I
________ IXI I ?� I
— 4020 `—� `I `— ----4020 �_� �t —I, I_ ABO
4020 U)
ABOVE I ABOVE I I ABOVE
I I I I I I
U Ep
� U
o�c I o�c I I o�2 ODl9 9)
al
���
u
/ \\ I I I I I I / \ � Ln
y� 0
I I I I I I
I I d N 3
I I X
3
I I I I I I ap
I,
I I I I y I I
12' x-14' O.H.D. 1 12'_x 14' O.H.D. I 12'—x 14' O.H.D. �-
� I I
— E +' i
c p I
X X I
10 v y y N I
I U u' a m I
m _ E Q a l y
a u> m I v'
Q �-N ' 7 QI y � "
WHAREHOUSE WHAREHOUSE WHAREHOUSE _ $ .' _ 1
I �I
y E
r
8,_2,. �,_1„ 1q,_6„ �,_6„ 81_211 8,_2„ 5,_�„ 18,_O„ 1q,_6„ �,_1„ R
'01 ME
73
q)57<
X X m v
\\ \\ aSL W 73
F
O �
I �
0 I
n
I
(n (n (n
x (LLJn cLU LU
n cn X
'..
a- a- 0-
I
3070 II
t INSUL. 3070 r= II - ----- --I 3070 oo I- U
v' :STEEL �, IF
INSL.��FNSUL. Z pv
1-- -STEEL -STEEL -
\ X R-STROOM I RES fR00M RESTROQM \ X
4,-- * ------
---' * i
3070 3070 3070
INSUL. INSUL. INSUL.
STEEL STEEL STEEL L
O
r
O -
0 — z
C5..
OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE z
o
O
ao
z
4020 4020 - 4020
4040 / v / v / v_ABOVE / / �v / v 4040 / v / �v / �v ABOVE _,' �v �v / v ABOVE _1_ v / �v / �v 4040
X I I j l XI I I IXI I 1 .. �
SITE NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS AND
EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR A COMPLETE AND FUNCTIONAL
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM.
2. MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH CODES, UTILITY
REQUIREMENTS, LAWS AND ORDINANCES OF FEDERAL, STATE, OSHA
AND LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES HAVING JURISDICTION.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CODES AND STANDARDS
APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT THAT ARE LISTED BUT NOT LIMITED
TO: NEC, NFPA, NEMA, ANSI, IES, IEEE, NFPA LIFE SAFETY 101,
ASHRAE 90.1, IECC ENERGY CODE AND IBC BUILDING CODE.
4. PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING, TRENCHING, ETC. CONTACT ALL LOCAL
UTILITY COMPANIES AND MUNICIPALITIES AND CONFIRM EXACT
LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES.
5. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LISTED AND/OR LABELED BY
UL OR ANOTHER NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY.
6. ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, WIRING DEVICES, ETC SHALL BE NEW,
UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED AS EXISTING TO BE REUSED.
7. ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED, HANDLED,
ERECTED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED, CLEANED, ADJUSTED, TESTED,
CONDITIONED AND PLACED IN SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
MANUFACTURERS DIRECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
8. COORDINATE THE UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE FEEDS AND
INSTALLATION.
9. ALL POLE FIXTURES TO BE LOCATED 4' AWAY FROM EDGE OF CURB.
10. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE CONNECTED TO A COMMON
EQUIPMENT GROUND. USE #8, TYPE THWN.
11. ALL CIRCUIT TO BE PLACED IN 1" CONDUITS UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED. CIRCUIT TO USE COPPER WIRE, TYPE THWN.
12. THE CONTROLLING LIGHTING CONTACTORS SHALL BE MOUNTED INSIDE
THE BUILDING WITH TIME -CLOCK CONTROL & REMOTE PHOTOCELLS
LOCATED ON THE EXTERIOR SIDE OF THE BUILDING WALL. INSTALL
PHOTOCELLS AT LOCATIONS WHERE BUILDING OR OTHER
OBSTRUCTIONS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THEIR PROPER OPERATION.
FINAL BRANCH CIRCUIT SUPPLY CONNECTIONS WILL BE PROVIDED BY
THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS.
13. MIN. BURIAL DEPTH FOR THE LIGHTING CIRCUIT SHALL BE 24". A
SLIGHT DECREASE IN DEPTH IS ALLOWED WITHIN 10' OF THE POLES.
14. VERIFY CONSTRUCTION AREAS ON OTHER SITE PLANS FOR
POTENTIAL OBSTACLES AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
ELECTRIC GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL,
STATE AND LOCAL ELECTRICAL CODES.
2. ENERGY CODE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASHRAE 90.1 2010.
3. COORDINATE WORK WITH ALL OTHER TRADES.
4. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
5. ALL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN APPROVED RACEWAYS.
6. ALL EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT
ALL LOCATIONS.
7. ALL MEASUREMENTS TO TOP OF BOX. RECEPTACLES SHALL BE 20"
A.F.F. SWITCHES SHALL BE 48" A.F.F.
8. GFI PROTECT ALL RECEPTACLES WITHIN 6' OF EVERY SINK.
II II
�I t1
II
T
-rte �� '-----------------------------� II
II 11
I I
II II
II 1 II
I I n
+0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1
II
+ + + + + +0
+ + + \ 10.
+ +0.71 1 1�
02dI 0.4 05 0.4U0 0.5 0.6 0.5 03 0.7 0.7 06 0.6 1,0 0. 1 i�a1 ii
\
II II II
+ + + + + + X11 + 11 +
0.1 11 0.3 .5 2.8 1.3 6.4 1.0 6.2�, AA 2.6 l!l2 0.1 1 0.1
ii O AA AA n AA " AA qA"
II i0.1
.111 0.2 11 0.1 +0.3 11 0.1
i I I
0.2
.1 11 11 I /� II
+0.1 +0.11 +0.7 l i 1.2 BUILDING A ; BUILDING B +2_i +0.9 i i '122 +0.1
I I 1
i,
J.2 II SAA 11
AAc 6 976 SU 6,976 SC ;; 11 0.2
+0.1 t)` I 1.3 i +4.-/ 9 +30 +0.9 +0.2 +0.1
11 +
+0.211 ill i ii 10.2
+ � II + + I + 1 + _V1
0.1 +0.211 0.6 n. 0.9 0 0.3 11
II I j 1 II
0.1 ii 11 I i I
to.1
7W11 i i +0.2 +d'� AA + a +„ + + u + + + + +
1.7 4.7 1.6 0.7 3.1 3.3 1.7 4.7 1.1 + 0.2 11 0.1
0.1 i i l 0.1
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
.1 11 0.2 0.8 2.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 0.8 1.0 1.9 1.5 1.8 1.1 0.7 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 0.7 0.2 11 111
0.1 l i !I 11
II+ + + + + + +
_ _ _ _ _ - - -- - ---- � -
1 n --_F -F--- + + + + + +
Q1 11 0.2 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.7 1.1 + + + + 1.2 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.2 11 0.1
10.1
+ II 1
0.1 II
1 11 0.2 0.9 2.9 1.8 2.3 2.8 0.8 1.2 3.6 ¢'.0 3.8 1.8 0.8 3.0 2.9 1.5 4.4 _+1.2 0.2 1111 +�Oi1
1
- O O
1 11 // n n L --- O -- ___� I L - -_� L -_-J 0.1
+@i 11 +0.2 �I"+0.2--- ---� 1 J
11 +0.411 II +0.3 i i +C2 +0.1
0.2
�.1'II II I I 1 1 I II II
n n I 1 ! 11
+0.1 +2 +0.5 11 +0.8 i 1.9 { { 1.0 i i +6112 +0.1
0.2i1' " BUILDING C BUILDING D
H 9 76 SC SAA 11 ii .3
+0.1 +0131 i 1.0 i i+6 c 6, 9 7 6 S C 9 +4.4 111 1.5 111 +0.3 +0.1
0.2
10.
11
0.3
+0.1 +012 Iii +0.7 }2.0 i +0.8 1 +0.6 i i +0+Q.2 +0.1
III II 1 I I I II
-01
}0.211 II I i 1 11 II
1111 �+ T0. + AA + IAA' + ii ii 11
`AA AA
+O.Q Iii +0.3 11'1+0.4 u uAq 0.2 1.9gq 7.1 9 8Y + + 0.4 + 10.11 .1
11 0.2 it 0
0.1
0.1 II _ =�__-___= _�_-===�-T=====__�
+ + - Lr+- ----+- + + + + + + + + +� + + +14
+ +
0..1 0.1 0.2 1.4 2.8 L 11 11 i 11
9 1.3 1 3 2.1 0.6 LO 1.8 0.8 1 U 1.0 1.0 1 4 0.4 I I 0.1
0.1111 �
\ I I
11 + I + + + + + + + + + + +\ + + + +
0.2 0.3 0.3 ' 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.� 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 +0.1 11
II II
_._.- -------- i -- - - - - - ---_-._._._._
- --- -- - ---_- -
-
u-- - - - - -- #----4 ----+ _ + _ + -+ + + + + + + + + + +
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
II II
II rrf � II
n �' 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 \ \D 0.4 0.5 0. 0.4 0.7 0.5 \\ 0.6 0.6 0.8 i1 0.3 I 0.1 11,
� 111 II II
ii I� \ 11
II II
IIL � -_ "kms =_ _� --=t=- �L k __ _ _ _-___ -_ +- _ �++ +-_ -+- �- + +
+0.1 2 LT�� r� 1 =_- - - 5.1 0.6 1.3 7. O.5 0.1 11'+0.1 0.1
I I OAA
X0.1 i i i i AA 0 AA AA _ n AA AAo
II II I I I I 1 II 11 0.1
+0.1 '0.1 1 i +0.2 2 i 1 '0.2 +0.3 110.2 +0.1
+ II +0.1
0.2 11
0.1 0.1 11 0.4 0 2.0 11 1.6 0.4+0.2 +0.1
+ + ' 11+ �I BUILDING S + 17-
+0.211 BUILDING E SAA 11
+ + 0.311+ 11 AAc 6 9 76 SU 1 6 9 9 76 SC 1111 + Illill -0.2 +
0.1 0.2 11 0.7 5 9 2.6 1.9 �.4 0.1
0.2
10.311 1
II II I I I II
+ + I+ +I + +
0.1 0.1 10.2ii 0.5 1i 1 0.4 11 2'0.1 0.1
I I
III II I I I I II
r '01
r ---r I r ---r
0 1 11 U V i
+0.1 • 1+0.2 +0 u.2 " +2.6 + . 1.4 3.6 2.6 +0.4 I .1
0.1
+0.1 n
1
+0.1 111+0.2 +0.5 1.9 +2.3 1.5 +2.4 1.1 +0.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 +0.8 1.0 1.7 1.2 1.5 1.2 +0.4 14.1 +0.1
+0.1 ; I I
0.1
0.1 911111@.r ---0.'t---0.8---.6_- 1.0 1.0 0.8 --0.7 0.9 1.1 1f 1.1 1.0 0.7 ---0.8 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.4._._._111_,.
n n
1 n 0.1
10.1
+ F + + + + + + + + + ' + + + + + + + + +
0.1 1 110.1 0.4 1.5 2.2 1.4 2.5 1.2 0.7 2.2 2.4 ! 2.3 2.8 0.8 1.4 3.4 1.4 2.7 2.5 0.4 �1 �0.1
0.1 11
0 I�--- A L 1
I -- IL -
0.1 0.1 0. - 1.a .4 �---� ' ` - I 1. I 1 11+0.2 11 0.1
+0.111 I� ii it i0.1
II II I I 1 I II II
+0.1+ 0.2 1 11.1 +oi +0.2+0.1
°•211 BUILDING G BUILDING H
+ 11 SAA ;; ;II 0.2
+0.1 00.4 +2.11 AAc 6 976 S C 1+3.2 +0! +0.1
1 ;1 6, 976 SC 9
10.211 .1 0.2
i I
I
+0.11.4 1.� i.6 i 1 1.0 +Oil 0.2+0.1
0.211 11
I I I 1 ! I I q1 F
+ r 1 ! 0.1
+0.1 0.1 '�.2 +0.� 1.2 u F j AAu u AA AAu Y0.9 S.2 +0!1 +0.1
+ l u AA AAu AA 111 1 i0.1
0.1
�i1 0.11 0.5 115 1.5 1.� 3.5 0.9 34 1.21 I 0.6 27 1.3 22 0.9 2.2 1 0.9 0.1
I \� 11 � � 1 � � I /i
1 N i \
II + + + + + + ! + + + + +0
II
0.1 ) 0.4 '0.4 0.L 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 '0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1
+0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1
1 ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLAN
E1.1 SCALE: 1" = 30'
0 15' 30' 60'
LIGHTING LEGEND
F-7-1 RECESSED 2x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE
Z RECESSED 2x2 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE
0 INDICATES NIGHTLIGHT FIXTURE
INDICATES EMERGENCY FIXTURE
® INDICATES EMERGENCY/NIGHTLIGHT FIXTURE
I� SURFACE MOUNT 1x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE
D HIGH BAY 2x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE
SURFACE WALL MOUNTED FLUORESCENT FIXTURE
SURFACE CEILING MOUNT FLUORESCENT FIXTURE
0 RECESSED DOWNLIGHT
+ SURFACE WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE
SURFACE MOUNTED FIXTURE
SURFACE MOUNTED PENDANT FIXTURE
OUTSIDE POLE -MOUNT LIGHT FIXTURE
EXTERIOR GROUND MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE
EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURE
LED EXIT SIGN -SHADED AREA INDICATES ILLUMINATED
FACE
LED EXIT/EMERGENCY SIGN -SHADED AREA INDICATES
ILLUMINATED FACE
EXTERIOR EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHT
SINGLE POLE SWITCH
$2 2 -POLE SWITCH
$3 3 -WAY SWITCH
$4 4 -WAY SWITCH
sp SWITCH W/PILOT LIGHT
OS1 WALL MOUNTED SINGLE LEVEL OCCUPANCY SENSOR
FO -S2 WALL MOUNTED DUAL LEVEL OCCUPANCY SENSOR
OS CEILING MOUNTED OCCUPANCY SENSOR
NL INDICATES FIXTURE TO REMAIN ON FOR
SECURITY PURPOSES
A,B INDICATES LIGHT FIXTURE SWITCH -LEGS
P -X INDICATES PANEL AND CIRCUIT NUMBER
O INDICATES LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE
EX INDICATES EXISTING FIXTURE
RL INDICATES RELOCATED FIXTURE
TC INDICATES FIXTURE CONTROLLED BY TIMECLOCK
EM INDICATES EMERGENCY FIXTURE
LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE
TYPE LAMPS WATTAGE DESCRIPTION NOTES
AA LED 26 LED WALL PACK, 4000K -
NOTES:
WPLED26 F
I
Projrct: Typo:
Prepared By: Oats:
Driver Info LED tela
Type: Corstant Current Wars- 21
4'0 121111: 0211A Color Tel 500DK
2D6V- 0.16A Color Accuracy. 70 CRI
24611- 0.14A L7o Lhilitil 100000
21711:0.12A Lumens: 2.662
Inpvl Watts: 30W Elncacy: 90 LPW
LED 26W Wallpacks. PA -1: Pending Ilrerrrral managerl system. 1f10•a00 hour Eflfclerl 88%
L7011fespan$ Year Warranty.
Color Ill Weigni 7.5 lbs
Technical Specifications
z
Listings
Ambient Tamporature:
Country of Origin:
UL Listing:
Suitable for use in old°C ambienl lemperelwes.
Designed by RAB in New Jersey and assembled in the
Sullable for wet Iorallpns Suitable far moungrlg vat
Cold Weather Slarll ng:
USA by R9B's IBEW LWAI3 markers.
1.2m (4a) of the gmurM.
Country of Origin:
Dark Sky Approved:
The minimum starting IampereWre is 40.6.
Thermal Management:
Designed by RA13 In New Jersey and assembled in
The Internallbnal Dark Sky Assmalron has approved
Taiwan.
this Product as a full -toff, lolly shielded fumineire.
Cast aluminum Thennel Management system forTrade
Agreements Act Compliant:
DLC Listed:
optimal heat Sinking. The LPACK is designed for coal
operation, most efficient oulpol and maximum LED life
Thig product is a product of Taiwan and a "oesignaled
TMs product Is on the Deatgn Lights CMSorl (DLC(
by minimizing LEDjunctim tampetALUM.
col end product that camptles w11h rile Trade
Oualfaed Products List and is eligible fa raberes from
Green Technology:
Agreements Aa-
DLCMember utilities.
w
GSA Sichedul0:
DLC Preduat Code- Pa000170I
Mercury and uV free. RoH3 car lianl components.
U
LED Charactaristica
PplyEsler powder coat finish formulated wftout the
Suitable in accordance vin FAR Subpar 25.4.
O
use of VDc or toxic Heavy metals.
Equivalency:
Lifespan:
For use on LEED Buildings:
to 175W Molal Halide.
100,0Mhour LED lifespan basad on IES LM -80
IDA Dark Sky means foal dos fhQure can ba
Optical
Opdea[
results and TW21 nal-ulatluna.
used 10 ecmave TEED Credits for Light Pollution
a LEEDl
Calor Consistency:
Reduction,
BUG Rating:
7 -step Machdam Edlpse Wring to achlave oonsistanr
Eloctrioal
B1 U0 Go
fl dune-ro-0alure -tor.
Driver!
BUG Rating:
Color Stability:
MuQicMp 26W high oulput long life LED Driver
61 Lia Go
LED color tamperatum is warranded! Io shift no more
Constant Current, 720rnA, Class 2, BkV Surge
ii 200K in CCT over a 5 year period.
Protection, l llDV-277V, 50.89 Mg. 100.24011.4 AMPS.
Color Uniformity:
THD'
RAB's range of CCT (Correlated Color Temperature]
7.5% at 12W, 11%at 27711
follows trm g"'IdInes of he Amarican National
other
5lonrded for Spedrmdon5 for rhe Chrom irity of
Solid Slate Lignling 1831] Products. ANSI C7a.977-
California Title 24:
2015.
Sea WFLE02r><PC for a 2013 California Tfte 24
Construction
compliant modal.
IP Rating:
Patients:
Ingress Protection rating or IKE for dust end water
Th. WPLED design ie protected by U.S. Pat.
D594878, Canada Pat 134878, CNna Pat.
Finish;
CN301949IXi45.
Cor envimnmenuft friendly polyester powder coatings
are lormilill for high -d rmblll and long-lasting
calor, and contains no VOC a twcic heavy metas.
Need harp? Tach help line: 1886) FLAB- 5000 Email: ealss@r.1-Bl .corn Wabslla: www.rahwah.com
Copynghl l 2014 RAB Llghfu+g Inc. AN Rights Reserved NMB: sperigcatill am subject W change at any are without notice
WPLED26
❑irnensions
IIvlrte lfreR
fkt�Ya
__4 Jrrna. ao.r
pL rdW
Ordering Matrix
Family watts Color Temp
-PLED I
211= 2fiW Blank = ii (Cocl)
V = 3DWK (Warm}
N = 40ODK lNeutral)
Pegs 1 or 1
Features
kfign performance LED right engine
Nsainlaina 70% of initial -mens at 100,0010 hauls
WealheprdOf high temperature silicone gaskets
Supanor heal Sinking with die cast aluminum Musing and external fins
1Da up to 277 Vohs
`✓year Warrarry
Sensor Filml Prow l Dimming
Blank = No Sensor Blank - Bnonm Blank = No Photocell Blank = No Dfmmlrrg
MS = Mini Sensor W = white Me = 12011 Button 1610 = Dlmrrlable
]PCS = 120V Swivel
Ill = 277V Budde
Need relp? Te h holy tine (seal RAB-t000 Email. sales*rabwub.com Wobsnel www.rabwob.com
Copyngh192014 RAB Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved Note: Specifioauons are subject to change at any time will real
w
a
0
w
a
z
z
0
U
Cn
LLJ
0
z
0
Ld
IY
••
z
O
=
LL_
CD
U
W
W
D
F__
O
Cn
M
w
Q
W
U
M
M
o
O
Lv
Lv
In
O
LIJ
U
J
J �
Z
z
=
Q
w 0
••
z
O
=
LL_
CD
U
W
W
D
F__
O
Cn
z
Q
W
U
O
o
J
J
ry
In
O
c
U
0
LLI
3
z
W
SHEET N0.
E1.1
I
1
I
I
I
!
1
1
I
I
I
I
DUNDASROAD
-
_ � I
10" D.I.P. I
NEW ACCESS
15R.C.P L: DRAINAGE AND
�_ SAN MH
NEW ACCESS UTILITY EASEMENT
SAN MH I RIM ELEV.=960.04
1 RIM ELEV.=961.96
INV. ELEV.=943.7 (TYPICAL) INV. ELEV.=942.8
j
I
i (S 90000'00" E Plat)
�15b0
T N 88°36,' 53 E
300.00 T �T~TT T T T »� »2-0. -»
---TEL. RISER20.00
- - - - -
.6.0
»-
Qp - `--------------------- 1 -
-U TILI T\0
o 't
710.01 EASEM Er�1T
I I o 9.0
o WHO
q9 qq
\w i - IN _ jj \
19
Im
DRAINAGE AND AND - ___-_-- UTILITY EASEMENT Q _ UTILITY EASEMENT
it
a_ (TYPICAL)
(TYPI CAL)III it j 109
109 i
II ;
;� 00 11 I 11; ! c� 11 I I o
-- 10.0i-
b
- I �f-
�d BUI L NG A �, - BUILDING B II
6,9 76 SF y --5.0 6,976 SF
II i LOT 1 5.0- t LOT 2 II i
I
If
'i' j 23,100 SF 23,094 SF? s o -
1j X20.0-#; ;
6.0 0.53 AC 0.53 AC 10.
I ---f-, 36.0-
,.
36.0 I I L_: I
Hsi'---LIJE
I I i
II • i i � I i
1 1 15 0. 0 i f ! 150.0Fp
i
I If I I I o I
I ,
MOW 11 i� 1 I I ii
LINE !1 i; LOT 3 -y- LOT 4 11 i
20,400 SF o y --5.0 20,390 SF
!� 0.47 AC 5.0- 0.47 AC
_10.0i__
I
11
I • 10.0 -
I- BUILDING C G BUILDING D
II
II '�
11 it C°
6,9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF
I' I i! II i
I
� I n
11 "d_ - WOj f7NCE 14-20.0-
COIF JE +\- I i 6.0-
o 9.9 i
ON i;; n 109 - i
T-35.9-
I
-� 6.0 _� 0.0 E 9
C3 36.0-'r-- n + i i A
I
^� h 11 I I
a 120.0: __ -1`- ---------- --- --'------------------------- -.1� ----------------
-- ------------- ------------- -- ---- ---,� I
\\\
Wc�co !;' i! lO \ oo 0 jii
O M 9.0
o cv) Ii I o N I
CO
O co II i ' t o N i i
150.0 0 14
11 • ;
11 1 i;% !;
Q- 11 1 N)
II I III IIOI \ o \ �l
O O III i! I I ,
1 Ij
If ! it
CHAINLINK ---� Io
I II 109 �, 109 --j' io.j--
11 i1 p i II i
FENCE +
ON LOT LINE. III i! 111
Q6 III II BUILDING F
n -"110.0 -BUILDING E 11 i
6,976 SF 6,976 SF 11
II
DRAINAGE AND
UTILITY EASEMENT
(TYPICAL)
11 ill � 6, 976 SF 6,9 76 SF I 1`
CHAINLINK 11 i1 Imo_,
I! I
FENCE +\-- `
0.5 FT. WEST
OF LOT LINE.
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\-
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER -
N 89°14'00" E
--------------
ill
C'
i1. 01
--i*j 10.0 109 1
-36.0+H - A
~H I
-20.0 ---------------
--- -
� �
I
-6.09.
O
:L0
0
m
I_" ---M 0 W
p LINE
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
0
00
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
II ill j
I �
-5. 0
LOT 5
LOT 6
I I
,
0
SF =
3.44
5.0-- F
20,400 SF
20, 384 SF
I 6.0
26.0
I 1
r--120.0-rI i
116.0
I
I
I
0.47 AC
0.47 AC
� 9.9 %
' 135.9-
i l
o ___-_---
I
-�;j,1o.o �
I : 0,, I
DISTURBANCE AREA
+
I
-
� �
36.0
11 I '-t-
I
I
-
- �• )
U' .°
a)
11 ! ,
• I
+
--
I I
+ ! ----- _-----_----_-_.
,o
•pi
'
° o
o.-.-.�r-.-L
I i
� I
i
i
�-�---5.1
4, o
o
] o
+\
!I i
150.0 i
i 149.9
X
I^
_O
T
'
11 i
o
�]� O Z
I I
I
LOT 7
LOT 8
! I
41
I j
Qui
4� o
32,000 SF p -5.0
32,145 SF
�!! i
0.73 AC 5.0~
0.74 AC
1
11--i'1�0.0 -
11
BUILDING G
BUILDING H
s.s If
11 ill � 6, 976 SF 6,9 76 SF I 1`
CHAINLINK 11 i1 Imo_,
I! I
FENCE +\-- `
0.5 FT. WEST
OF LOT LINE.
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\-
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER -
N 89°14'00" E
--------------
ill
C'
i1. 01
--i*j 10.0 109 1
-36.0+H - A
~H I
-20.0 ---------------
--- -
� �
I
-6.09.
O
:L0
0
m
I_" ---M 0 W
p LINE
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
0
00
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
0
0
0
DRAIN
o AGE AND
UTILITY EASEMENT
(TYPICAL)
it
II
II
II
II
5.2 +\-
I- I� --
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
�I
.I
li 0
.I
II
II
I o
II
II
11
0
ill
ii
n
ii
o
i
0
STORM WATER DRAINAGE AND l
MANAGEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT
(TYPICAL) p
U\'PL_I TY--
EASEMEN - '
o-----299.81 N e,9°14'00" E ---- o--------
/----------------
'00.0
Ov V ---- --
_ , `'�oo�oao$. 0 ��t �`��' -- 299.81, 149.8 I ° o°°
LINE - m p A° �q' ��- m (300.02 Plat)
---SHED
' ° °
I
S 9016' 45" '--CURB
LANDSCAPE
--EDGING/MULCH
-- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
0-0- ,--- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
N 89°14'00" E
--- I ------1899.53 ------
ti _
-----------------------
`3�66
(N 89021'11" W Plat STOP -TEL. LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE- / GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD ----CB IF RISER EDGING/MULCH
EDGING/ROCK
& SHRUBS
F-------I------
i !
SAN MH
ELEV. = 958.59 -
r-- - - -- -- `
I I !
A r-� n 11- � A I � I-
ELEV. = 958.16 _ _ \---SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL
PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS !
1 ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1
I n I A nFj I -T-I n f\ iI
r------ 7---
I i
0 30 60 90
Mimi
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SWC AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
SITE DATA:
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING PID:
EXISTING LOT AREA:
LOT 1 1:
1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
155-018-003020
191,832 SF = 4.40 ACRES
PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS:
64x109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA
2,822
I �
0.06
Q
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA
0
SF =
3.44
ACRES >> 78.2%
0
147,210
I 1
3.38
I
I
I
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA
00
SF =
i l
o ___-_---
-a-CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
DISTURBANCE AREA
5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
SF =
4.60
� �
d
Z
I Awa
° o how
I a`��� °
U' .°
a)
o
j��
s l
! ,c)"�
c �
'
° o
r/1 O
o
co0
i
�-�---5.1
4, o
o
] o
+\
0
0
0
DRAIN
o AGE AND
UTILITY EASEMENT
(TYPICAL)
it
II
II
II
II
5.2 +\-
I- I� --
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
�I
.I
li 0
.I
II
II
I o
II
II
11
0
ill
ii
n
ii
o
i
0
STORM WATER DRAINAGE AND l
MANAGEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT
(TYPICAL) p
U\'PL_I TY--
EASEMEN - '
o-----299.81 N e,9°14'00" E ---- o--------
/----------------
'00.0
Ov V ---- --
_ , `'�oo�oao$. 0 ��t �`��' -- 299.81, 149.8 I ° o°°
LINE - m p A° �q' ��- m (300.02 Plat)
---SHED
' ° °
I
S 9016' 45" '--CURB
LANDSCAPE
--EDGING/MULCH
-- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
0-0- ,--- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
N 89°14'00" E
--- I ------1899.53 ------
ti _
-----------------------
`3�66
(N 89021'11" W Plat STOP -TEL. LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE- / GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD ----CB IF RISER EDGING/MULCH
EDGING/ROCK
& SHRUBS
F-------I------
i !
SAN MH
ELEV. = 958.59 -
r-- - - -- -- `
I I !
A r-� n 11- � A I � I-
ELEV. = 958.16 _ _ \---SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL
PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS !
1 ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1
I n I A nFj I -T-I n f\ iI
r------ 7---
I i
0 30 60 90
Mimi
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SWC AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
SITE DATA:
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING PID:
EXISTING LOT AREA:
LOT 1 1:
1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
155-018-003020
191,832 SF = 4.40 ACRES
PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS:
64x109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA
2,822
SF =
0.06
ACRES
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA
150,032
SF =
3.44
ACRES >> 78.2%
NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE
147,210
SF =
3.38
ACRES
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA
41,800
SF =
0.96
ACRES >> 21.8
DISTURBANCE AREA
200,441
SF =
4.60
ACRES
PARKING DATA:
REQUIRED PARKING STALLS:
OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES
WAREHOUSE © 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES
Total= 53 SPACES
PROVIDED PARKING STALLS:
9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES)
SETBACK: 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING
FRONT 30 6
INTERIOR SIDE 15 6
STREET SIDE 30 6
REAR YARD 15 6
L V
cu W
O N
� cc GO M
,cu Q. O� 4)
�•+ zto
IGGGG ccz 6_
W y
Usct
11iW C w
p DGuam -
O
ctcr
0.O c
O
MINING
cu LLW
IGGGG
co
FILE NO. 00633
Preliminary Plat
o c0
O
0
cco
1.2 j
1-
I
p
C
N
�
(� co N
a
CIO
m
I
42
Z
I a`��� °
U' .°
a)
o
j��
s l
I 0 X I N
fbca
�oQ)N�
c
4, o
L/ft
I^
00o
'
�]� O Z
LC
U
p y
41
Qui
4� o
ti
co
3 - rr.
FILE NO. 00633
Preliminary Plat
O
0
cco
((O
o
�
�
CIO
m
o
m
W
o
FILE NO. 00633
Preliminary Plat
I
I
I
I
DUNDAS ROAD
I
I _
1
I
I
'
10" D.I.P. I ��
NEW ACCESS
0 ' ' =� 4 ` ' 15� R.C.P �i > DRAINAGE AND
SAN MH
°p '�T i NEW ACCESS o UTILITY EASEMENT
SAN MH I RIM ELEV.-960.04
RIM ELEV.=961.96 I I i (TYPICAL) INV. ELEV.=942.8
INV. ELEV.=943.7 j
i - (S 90000'00" E Plat)
N 88036'53" E ►- " "-©- ; "�
T T -
-iv T T T T T 1-
r20.0- + 15 b. O 300,00 T T T T T T T y / T T20` %- TEL. RISER --
•'b r `\ O
�1 I � 10.0-- U TILI T
4y1 o EASEMENT o
Q \ \
w III it • IN �I \ p p I \ _ 11 I DRAINAGE AND
DRAINAGEAND i I r - ___- _-__ ___ -___- _ ---' __ _ . - r= -____ __ - -_ -__ E=__�=__ =- =_- ____ _ ___�_ ---- =_ =__-_ _�__. -,;1 �' I m
UTILITY EASEMENT Q
o° ''r S UTILITY EASEMENT
(TYPICAL) I i 109 icn
1 _ (TYPICAL)
f
109 cn I i I
it I li O li I
i1 - li ii 1 '•
�O II I II ii I O
11 . I 0.01-- I
�� I I ; BUILDING A �,; BUILDING BI� L0
6,9 76 SF 6,976 SF
ill LOT 1 F --5.oLOT 2
III III 23,100 SF 5 0~ 23,094 SF i 6.0
1+20.0 -*1 0.53 AC -- 10. 3- r- i
IIB 0 II' 0.53 AC y ? 36.0
36.0
•----LIJE } i L
\'-- o
I
O ica
II- i I I 1 cr_
I i I j co
i 150.0 i 150.0 i
©
III i I i p i i l
III I, I i r 1 II
MOW I i i
LINE i• ii LOT 3 -- LOT 4
ill
20,400 SF O y20i
-5.0 ,390 SF
I I �, � �----mow
III !II 0.47 AC 5.0- 0.47 AC 1'0.0, I p LINE
10.0- BUILDING C BUILDING D
II I III
C°
6,9
76 SF 6,9 76 SF LI
I1
' I iII I i I I
I I i I
I ,WD F -NCE ;_20.0 '
-���1� 0S�\�F'+ 6.-1,'I-
0 9.9NNE 109 x35.90 109_+_41 6. .
Q
--
3 6. 0__jJ A + I i I
I 1., -II C)
I+�20.o-I+I __ 1 -1`--------------- __'== _'___-�
ALTA I NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
FOR
KENNETH SPAETH
I �
r�
i
ol:
`, h i
- - 10" D.I.P. l i-
\ ® 15" R.C.P. m a ro
� �� P, o END OF { �N MH
00 i - - s � 0, 960
RIM ELEV.=960.04 '
SAN MH DUNDAS ROAD o L z 60 ono �O. ,CULVERT
< o BURIED 960.0 959.90 INV. ELE)�.=942.8
RIM ELEV.=961.96 ��� 961.11 / 960.66, , ��p D - ' I 6 ) ( - ) ( ) ` 959.79 i
i INV. ELEV.=943.7 °� _ _ _ - -
( - 960-(S 90°00 00 E Plat) _ ". _ x 958.6
_ - -959- - - i
- -961- 1�1 X 9.7 959.2X N 88°36 53 E 9 - '�C 959.31 T - T- cv -
i 960.6 X� --fi T T T 300. �0� - S9 �T� -I���� q5n_ EL. RISER - -�
I- - - - - - - , L -0-961- -- - - - -
X_-- ---o -962----�- 961.9 6� � X - X - `� X961.5
962.1 962.9__`- __--�C-- - -- - -_ _ rt� - ---�--J�61.5 0,`�
i 962.5- 962.4
24" CMP -962- _
I\� '-UTILITY CULVERT \-
--96,3-
EASEMENT-
- - - -
_ DRIVEWAY 963.0
X 962.9 ` _ X 963. f-_ ACCESS TO X 962.5 1 0
962. 9
962.8X Q 9\ --MOW -963- - - PUBLIC STREET 962.3xI
LINE °D
cl� c I
Q
X962.2 -_// \ I T T
o X962.2 X963.5
X 961.9 X61.9 l
962.5
/ 963.1 X � o / ` 1 1 X 964.2
r - \g ` / 1 \
I X \ U 19
X 961.9 / 962.0 X 961.3 X 96�>Q
5 \ � \ I
N
��� Mow \ \ I
0963.7 X it X 961.5
96.5X i X \9B11 BX 963.7
�� �
964.3
h �o
�I
X 961.2 �
X 962.5
X 961.7 II \
l
MOW -,I
LINE I \ I I I
LEGEND
-T UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
WA TERMAIN
\, ❑ ❑
X 961.7 / rX961.0 X 961.0 i` -MOW
LINE I \
j C 62.0II II
964.5 X�96�\ i X 960" X 950. ? U' X g63 963.9
I --WOOD FENCE w I
964.4 I I ��' CORNER
.1(� ❑ -962.5 ON LOT LINE X 961.7 -
X 961.5IX
60.4 I I I I 96� -950-
•� I \ X 960.7 �X
960.5' X959.6 X 963.8 - - - -952-
PILE OF BRUSH/SMALLTREES (RECENTLY �\ o� x 961.1
�� X 59.5 6�•
p Imo•• \ / / CLEARED FROM SITE) Xc�° I 19 0
o �o X 962.3 I 9� 9. ( X 963.8
o f I 9ze,
1.4
co \CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- ❑
o �l I -
Z I �� ^ 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
I 59.0 \ \ \
963.4X / X 962.7 I / (APPROX.) I o
961.3 960.9 �I a' = \ 962.4 Il
CHAINLINK -y= 962.5 X 961.8\� / 961.2/ } W o\ \ \\
FENCE +\- / "i' ; Qo
ON LOT LINE. ^^ < \ / o 4 p1 \ ID
960.5
960.9• i �Q \o
1/
SANITARY MANHOLE
CATCH BASIN
HYDRANT
GATE VALVE
WATER SHUTOFF
0 - CHAIN LINK FENCE
❑ WOOD FENCE
DECIDUOUS TREE
CONIFEROUS TREE
SHRUB
INDEX CONTOUR
- - - INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
SPOT ELEVATION
CUL VERT
TELEPHONE RISER
POWER BOX
SIGN
BI TUMINOUS SURFACE
�00 7°0000
Lur o°°?o0
°0°�°°
o LANDSCAPED AREA
X 60.4
/ i I L------------�
X961.8 X961.5 / J X960.9-5.1\-� I-----------�
\ / I TILLED GARDEN
X 962.6 v
` � \ K 960.8 / / \961 1 X 958.7 -a-
� a o CONCRETE SURFACE
o
\ / \ \
� o
1 961.4 X X 961.3 9611.4
962.5 X 962.5 \ CONCRETE-- o \ 1
\ SURFACE
(APPROX.) / 1X 959.9
\ X 961.0
\ 961.3
a o
X 962.7 \
\ -y +\-
CHAINLINK -y X 962.3 BROKEN \ o %
FENCE + \- CONCRETE-- X 962.3 X961.3 -5.f
\ X 960.7
0.5 FT. WEST PIECE
OF LOT LINE.
\- `J
\ 961.5 0
\ X 961.7
X962.4 I r-
962.5 �.,,, �-MOW I �
CONCRETE-. I ',---�.�\ �\ 11 LINE I
962.6X 962 9 SURFACE
��X\ (APPROX.) 0 �i i c) �� o
� 962.6MOWi i Q 1 -- � r LANDSCAPE
\\�\���/ ��v a r°/�
),-962 .0-+ II LINE i i QO _\ 9/�'�,-EDGING/MULCH
NER
X�'6� CONCRETE�E�� _ ,,,,-'�/ / y\ 962.2._ _96 X gs g \\��`--- 1\`> 1 O' i 5.8AI FT.NK FENCE EAST OF LOT LINE + \ EAST QUARTER CORNER OF--\
-- QUARTER CORNER OF 967'2 x- °` �\ � , PIECE ----- I / `� ,' A 9 SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
IF i M 0 W E� /AREA RE r��96�' -SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEASTFOUND WRIGHT COUNTY MONUMENT)
-963- - 1 --------------------- ------------- Y 962.3 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25(CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- Spj E D�i(FOUND P.K. NAIL) `O UTILITY--.` N��FR GARDEN i M 0 W 961.8 c ~ I N 89'14'00" E
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER i � 1
\ N 89'14'00" E r °� EASEMENT �` + _ i yFgp, X 963.4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i �- _ ---
3123.56---
--ti
, - _ - - -E - -� � - � - -�- � --1899.53---
__- - �,� -299.81 N 9'14 00' E--- 962.6
---- 3123.56--- 964.2X rc --- o +���-_ �- _ -
-� y-96711 Uo'er 961.3
963.7X°"°o299.8--- _g61 40°°°° 9 `S� i3
�\ SHED 962_ o °o
LINE - 960 TC 958.96 -� -(300.02 Plat)- -��� _ i X 96 �g61 f �r
X960" X 960.2
Ticket Check Status
Ticket Number: 170740852
As of 3/21/17 13:15 CDT, participating facility owners have responded to Ticket Check as follows:
Company Name Typesy Status Time Comments
TDS TELECOM - Marked 03/16/17
BRDGWT01 9:06 AM
CHARTER
COMMUNICATIONS - TV,FO
CHACAB03
Not yet 03/15/17
responded 1:18 PM
CITY OF
MONTICELLO/FIBERNET E,FO,S,W
Non-
��
9S9\x�h
(SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN
S 89016
45 -CU
" � STOP
960.5 x'
960.5 I
-
�-TEL. -LANDSCAPE
CENTER POINT ENERGY
Clear/No
03/21/17
�G X
i
( N
89°21'
11 Wx Plat
\
Clear/No
r
RISER EDGING/MULCH
G
GAS - NNGAS03
conflict
8:30 AM
LANDSCAPE
-' GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD
�,�
°'
�- GB
LEV.=958.16-SOUTH
LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL
_ -
EDGING/ROCK
& SHRUBS
SAN MH
PARK (DL AS LSO
4
X
NORTH NE#OF7THE3PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS
ELEV.=958.59--
958.7
ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470)
T
-
L
-
��
I I I
�_r I
I
I
�-
L
[-F-r-
���1 12A
- II r- I n I
r- A ) A
. T A
X
A n I T I
r 4_ L_ I I V
I I /-\ I\ I V
I/-\ I I L_
I
1
I
Ticket Check Status
Ticket Number: 170740852
As of 3/21/17 13:15 CDT, participating facility owners have responded to Ticket Check as follows:
Company Name Typesy Status Time Comments
TDS TELECOM - Marked 03/16/17
BRDGWT01 9:06 AM
CHARTER
COMMUNICATIONS - TV,FO
CHACAB03
Not yet 03/15/17
responded 1:18 PM
CITY OF
MONTICELLO/FIBERNET E,FO,S,W
Non-
03/16/17
(SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN
- CMTCLO01
Excavation
11:23 AM
AS -BUILT PLANS PROVIDED)
CENTER POINT ENERGY
Clear/No
03/21/17
G
- MINGASO4
conflict
11:25 AM
Clear gas and power.
NORTHERN NATURAL
Clear/No
03/16/17
G
GAS - NNGAS03
conflict
8:30 AM
XCEL ENERGY - XCEL01
N:\Land Projects\17168 - Spaeth\dwg\17168.dwg
Clear/No 03/21/17
conflict 11:26 AM
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lot 2, Block 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County,
Minnesota.
PARCEL IDS#: 155-018-003020
SURVEYORS NOTES:
1. Matters of record are shown according to Commonwealth Land Title
Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance issued by
Preferred Title, Inc., Order Number: 6321428, Reference Number:
04001-17, Effective Date April 04, 2017.
2. Gross land area=4.40 acres
3. Underground utilities are shown according to ground markings per
Gopher State One Call Ticket Number 170740852 (non -excavation
request). Meyer-Rohlin Land Services is not responsible for utilities
that were not marked on the ground. Location of underground
utilities must be verified prior to any excavation by contacting
Gopher State One Call @ 651-454-0002 or gopherstateonecoi/.org.
See "Ticket Check Status" on this drawing for list of utilities &
response to ticket provided by Gopher State One Call.
4. Project Benchmark: Mn/Dot Geodetic Monument "8605 S" Elev.
966.55 (NA VD88 Datum)
5. Bearing orientation is based Wright County Coordinate System, NAD
83 Datum (86 Adjustment).
6. Rights of Way, easements, and servitudes listed in Schedule B,
Section 2 of the Commitment for Title Insurance (refer to Note #1):
Exception 9. - Utility easements as shown on the recorded plat of
Oakwood Industrial Park are indicated on this drawing.
0 40 80 120
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET
• DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND
DENOTES CAST-IRON MONUMENT FOUND
DENOTES P.K. NAIL FOUND
To Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, and Commonwealth Land
Title Insurance Company.
This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is
based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail
Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and
adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes items 1, 4, 5, 8, 11 of Table A
thereof. The fieldwork was completed between March 22 and April 5, 2017.
Date: April 18, 201177
Abram A. Niemela License No.` 48664
„ Iil" IIIIIIIIII1111111IIIIli
REVISIONS
SERVICES
708 1 ST AVENUE NE, 41
BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATE 0411 8I 17
PH. 763.682.1781 WWW.MEYERROHLIN.GOM
DRAWN BY BOOK 387 SHEET 1 OF FILE NO.
AAN PAGE 40 1 SHEETS 17168
I I .
10" D.I.P. -
II—
I 1
o S ► � ► ► ► ► ► 15 R. C. P.00
► ► s ► ► ► s ► s �; ►
SAN SAN MH
RIME liadl�elfil iif -� o- �� I .= E
�O iiVl/. tLtV.=9,
INV. ELEV.=943.7
—� Iy---�- T T T T T T T T T
52�� I!• I+ T�T T T T T T T T T � T —T-----IT`� � �_--TEL. RISER
-� w—x-- -- --- -----� --- --
I — -- -• - ---=---------- ""-_,-'"�___--ter------------==---------=----------=---- - � -
-----------
----� I
'"UTILITY {
EASEMENT
T - --
I +rv10 VA \ '� I \ � I ; i O
JI I II I I
CE
11 I I I I
I -I N = - ---- -- - - - --- _- _-_ -__ -___ = --�J \ I�
' ------------ ---- ---- -- - L m
111 T 1, P'1 I� �.
Q.
a \ I I =-
109 - '! �`
I
I. 109
,
DUNDAS ROAD
-
I
II I II
1, II I , , •
II �I I IT
LLJ
1; BUILDING A BUILDING B
o II I CO
6,976 SF 6,9 76 SF
it I FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50
II I, , I .
I
' y u u u U-O'O-O"O �p..OvO.:Oupupu0 7/�� II
0 0 OBD O_e_n
OeOn0�0,�0„O„O„O- o o e e
0 a a 0 a a 0 0 0 o�eOnOnO�O,�0e0 O O_O_o_on a _--
--- ; 'E'�_ - O
I
_ f I _
1;
I m
I I
r—.—��—�—�—�—�—�—�—�—�—�—�
I 1, • II !1i
mew _L
i, L�I I • i I I I � • � ' i '
1
--- ., v u U 0 U"O"O"O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g O O.O.O. n o
I I; • �%' O�O�o°o Oe O�O,u,O,°O�0�0�00 000°O°On0 O O O O_O.O.O.n n n ^p s O O"O"O O O"O�O�O�O�O�0�0�00�0�00p0pap
MOW
LINE I 1
II 1 1 I II I
j
it I i 1 it
It --MOW
I� I LINE
!I • I BUILDING C BUILDING D
C° 6, 9 76 SF 6,976 SF
I li 11 I I iI I
I � 11 I
it
I
.I 01_ F -NCE FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50
I
,IEP. +Uj
'
II 1 L-07 LINE 109 109
'I • ' ' I Q
a I 1 a 1 0
�' • I---------------------
---------'•---------------"-- ----
f
III ;lO
�Qp
I
I
1
Il \
1 \
o 0
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
- __, -
1'I \ \19 II � I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
II I I�1 Ii0 \ \ SII I I'
I
---- ---- I -------------- _ -
r l I I I �LL _�-yr------ =-- =-- — = = �____�___ �____-=_==—=-y-c �r------- -----�
rl • n a I i a I I
o
CHAINLINK ---� 1 109 109 ;'
FENCE + \-
' °I II
ON LOT LINE. III III
I I III
I I II -I I%• p
-II BUILDING E BUILDING F
6,976 SF 6,9 76 SF '
II III o
II it FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50
I I O
II /
., u u o-o•;vTa,.o"o"o'"o`''o"o"o°o°o°o°ol°o°o°o°o°o�o°noeo„ono„o„o-o_o_o_p I
u u u o-o-o-o-O"o"o'"o"'o'"o"0�o�o4oQo°o°o°o°o°o°oopopo„ono4o„ _. _o_o_o_o n n e n
�i°o°epn°no„O„o„o„o_o_o_�,_o n • ^�..:� j I
I I • _ I i - //
I
II I
f/ I
ISI I I . I II O
I 1 • _ � : I I
v -o 0 0 0 0 0
' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O"O 0 0 0 0 . e n n n �\
O O--O--°O p p`/Ou0u0U0°O°O°O°00"O`'O O�J°� 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ I II
?00-09
O O�OeO,,,�O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 1
.O.n n
1 I
I_ II I ii
0
I I II
1 li 1 II
I II II II
I I „ o
BUILDING G y BUILDING H I I•
6,976 SF 6,9 76 SF -- 5.2 + \-
CHAINLINK---� 1�
FENCE + - - - °
'I II
\ ! li' FFE-963.50 FFE=963.50 i'
0.5 FT. WEST
II= II
OF LOT LINE. I1 I' 109 109
1"
II II
I, II n �•
1
I II %�-----------------------------------'----------------- ----,,
---- ---
I I 11 1 r 17
�------ I I
II \ II �II i� 11
I p
O
- s
Dpi dad k�e � fiti¢ig YI�III I � ; ,
------ ------- ---------------------------_w ------• -------- ----------_S�1.L -- --- O
\ ° LANDSCAPE
\ ---EDGING/MULCH
--CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \-
5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE
I ,
1 ,
I ,
1 ,
CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- °moo o- ;---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25
N 89 °14'00" E \I EASEMENT i i „
------3123.56----- --- ` -----------1 N _ i ---------------------------------- N 89°14 00 E
--------------------t--------
---- o ----- 299.81 N (; 9 °14'ff E -------------i ----- -----
-_ �----- o ----------- 1899.53 -
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ��, n. w\ n �. _� n
fy
3 ,
'°oo°od°o°\`°MOW ° o
so '° o .LINE l e � SHED
s
.J
('--CURB I'
STOP -TEL. LANDSCAPE
RISER EDGING/MULCH
LANDSCAPE—
EDGING/ROCK GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD CB
\
ELEV.=958.16_ _ _SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL
& SHRUBS SAN MH i PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO -I r-
ELEV.=958.59NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS
I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470)
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
1 l i g r— � �� 1 r— n n n -T– n l -T- r— r-- � n l r� i � n rte► I� I � n l l I I
0 30 60 90
I
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
49 1 F7
I
").0L� 17.083 -4.829'
Oshkosh TI -3000 Aircraft Rescue * Flreflgghtinq Vehicle
Overall Lenqqth 39. 1 G7ft
Overall Width I 0.000ft
Overall Body Netght 1 1.83 1 ft
Min Body Ground -"Clearance I .G 12ft
Track Width 9.583ft
Lock -to -lock time 4.005
Wall to Wall Turning Radius 50.033ft
M�Lo ,,
L V
ca W
O N
M
,CU Q. O� 4)
mmftLos 1"'Ift cc z
�•+ z z `� CL
� W Us
Z w c 0
W�-
- > �= w�
O p gym♦ � �
_V 6
CL O O `J
ICU W
co
2
0
FILE NO. 00633
Fire Truck
Circulation Plan
O
1.2 '
L •h
co
C�
I
o
�
�
co N
. W
W
'')cOLO 1 o
c
Z
110)
U � •p
~I �
�AImO
' � x I N
�__
y H
q
s
W
m
CZL
Q
Lij
,
y
,QO 003
A) w
Q
V
J 0y
1
I
4� o
ti
3 t rr.
FILE NO. 00633
Fire Truck
Circulation Plan
O
0
co
o
�
�
�
m
m
m
W
Q
ti
Q
Q
O
O
Q
V
FILE NO. 00633
Fire Truck
Circulation Plan
EXISTING
— -�
-HYDRANT
00
SAN MH
I RIM ELEV.=961.96
INV. ELEV.=943.7
R=100
R=200
R= 300
R=300
R=200
I
-----------------
FENCE + \-
0.5 FT. WEST
OF LOT LINE.
PROPOSED---_
HYDRANT
CHAINL K FENCE CORNER +\- \1
0.4
\-
0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER ---,\ U)RLITY-
N 89°14'00 E EASEMEN
------3123.56-- -----------
----------------<------------
MOW
LINE a
LANDSCAPE
EDGING/ROCK
& SHRUBS
r -- — — — — —
I------�
I I
I I
�----- 299.81 N � 9�0"�E------ ^
GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD
SAN MH
ELEV. = 958
r -- — — — — —
I -----
I I
I I
I
EXISTING
HYDRANT
I
I
SAN MH
RIM ELEV.=960.04
INV. ELEV.=942.8
TEL. RISER
R=100
NCE CORNER + \-
OF LOT LINE
r,- LI NCE CORNERAS OF LOT LINE
--- SOUTI'""-IORTHEAST
1/4 0 R=300 -. 121, R. 25
N 89°14'00" E
------1899.53-----
- — — — — — — — — — — — —
-TEL LANDSCAPE
RI R EDGING/MULCH
5.16-- --_SOUTH LIN OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL _
PARK (DO .# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO
NORTH LI E OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS
ESTATES 2NDADDITION (DOC.# 753470)
I I I I I
I I I I I
n I n n IF h► I �I
0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES
708 1st AVENUE NE
BUFFALO, MN 55313
DATED: APRIL 18, 2017
BENCHMARK:
MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S"
ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM
PROJECT LOCATION
PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4,
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
N
0�60
,,two
a
co
V
5
W
o
O
N
I (n co N
%momoC
�'Li V'
M
c
Z
Q.
o
4)
,cu
� � Ox I N
I m �-
y � H
W
m (o
`12
a�Q-_ S_
Q
Q�
y
W
Us
y w
N
a
I
y
Zo
+.
JIS
U
1
p
ww
or O
I
Room
�o
10
4� o
ti
cu
W
o~
0
c
a
a
5
Ia�
o
o C
�
I (n co N
. L
�'Li V'
� (D U) o
c
Z
I a����
U � •p
01
~I �
A
� � Ox I N
I m �-
y � H
W
m (o
`12
a�Q-_ S_
Q
WQ_�ai3
y
o
y w
N
a
I
y
Zo
+.
JIS
U
1
I
an
4� o
ti
3 t rr.
FILE N0. 00633
-1 /_1
Fire Hydran t
Coverage Plan
o
�
�
m
m
o
m
W
o
ti
Q
v
0
o
a
FILE N0. 00633
-1 /_1
Fire Hydran t
Coverage Plan
Spaeth Industrial Park
Site Improvement Project
107Dundas Road
Monticello, MN
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS
Prepared for:
Ken Spaeth
108 Meadowlake Road SE
St. Michael, MN 55376
Phone: (612) 889-3100
spaethmasonry@gmail.com
Prepared bv:
Civil Engineering Site Design
Attn: Scott Dahlke
PO Box 566
118 East Broadway Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Phone: (763) 314-0929
sdahlke@civilesd.com
May 08, 2017
CESD Project # 00633
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Narrative
o Proposed Project
o Site Location
o Requirements
o Rate Calculations
o Existing Site Conditions
o Proposed Site Conditions
o Volume Abstraction and Water Quality Calculations
o Soils Data
o Summary
o Certification
Appendix A — Existing Conditions Drainage Calculations
o Existing Conditions Drainage Area Map
o 2 -Year (2.81 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event
o 10 -Year (4.18 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event
o 100 -Year (6.93 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event
Appendix B — Proposed Condition Drainage Calculations
o Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Map
o 2 -Year (2.81 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event
o 10 -Year (4.18 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event
o 100 -Year (6.93 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event
Appendix C — Volume Abstraction 1.0" Rainfall on New Impervious Surface
o Infiltration Worksheet
o Stage -Storage Containment Volume
Appendix D — Soils Data
o Soils Data per Web Soil Survey
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
Drainage Analysis Page 2
NARRATIVE
PROPOSED PROJECT:
The project proposes site improvements for multiple small industrial buildings. Site
improvements include new buildings, pavement, utilities, and associated items.
The project proposes collection of impervious surface drainage with storm sewer configured to
function as an underground infiltration system with overflow storm water routed to existing
roadside ditch of Dundas Road.
SITE LOCATION:
The site address is 107 Dundas Road in the City of Monticello, MN.
The project is in the SW 1/4 of the NE1/4, Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County,
MN. Access to the site can be achieved from Dundas Road along the north boundary.
REQUIREMENTS:
Stormwater management design for the project is subject to review by the Monticello.
Stormwater requirements for the project as received from City staff are as follows:
This property falls within a subwatershed that discharges to a regional pond to the
northeast. The regional pond was designed in the City's Comprehensive Water
Resources Management Plan and assumes a CN equal to 80 for the proposed Mini -
Storage parcel. Any modeling and/or proposed design should demonstrate that a CN
equal to 80 is not exceeded. Infiltration will also be required for the proposed project.
RATE CALCULATIONS:
The storm water runoff and calculations of this report are based on Nationwide Urban Runoff
Program (NURP) and the Soil Conservation Service Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method
incorporated into the software program HydroCad 10.0. Rainfall precipitation depths used in
calculations are current NOAA Atlas 14 Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates for Monticello,
Minnesota for the 2 -Year (2.81 -inch), 10 -Year (4.18 -inch) and 100 -Year (6.93 -inch) rainfall
events.
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS:
The existing site is vacant property that has been designated as industrial development
property. Most of the existing site has grass turf coverage. Small areas of concrete pavement
exist at various locations at the site remaining from previous industrial site activity. Existing
storm water runoff for the site is primarily directed by natural topography to adjacent property to
the east, small areas of runoff drains north to Dundas Road ditch, and a small area drains south
to adjacent property.
Existing Conditions Drainage Area Map and associated HydroCAD Analysis calculation model
printouts can be found in attached Appendix A. The flow rates from the existing site are
summarized in the table below:
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
Drainage Analysis Page 3
EXISTING FLOW RATES DISCHARGING OFFSITE
2 -Year (2.81") Runoff 10 -Year (4.18") 100 -Year (6.93")
Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs)
TOTAL EXISTING 0.03 0.61 6.59
CONDITION
PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS:
The site is proposed to be improved with multiple buildings, pavement, utilities, and associated
site improvements.
Storm water improvements for the project are needed to limit rate control to Existing Conditions
discharge rates, and provide volume control for water quality requirements.
The project proposes collection of impervious surface drainage with storm sewer configured to
function as an underground infiltration system. A surface infiltration basin is provided at the
south end of the development and is connected to the storm sewer system. The infiltration
basin provides additional storm water storage volume and additional system infiltration capacity.
Storm water overflow is routed to Dundas Road ditch at the north east corner of the site.
Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Map and associated HydroCAD Analysis calculation model
printouts can be found in attached Appendix B. The flow rates from the proposed site are
summarized in the table below:
Total Proposed
Conditions
PROPOSED FLOW RATES DISCHARGING OFFSITE
2 -Year (2.81") Runoff
Rate (cfs)
0.04
10 -Year (4.18")
Runoff Rate (cfs)
0.12
VOLUME ABSTRACTION AND WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
100 -Year (6.93")
Runoff Rate (cfs)
4.03
Volume abstraction is required to be provided for 1.1" rainfall on new impervious surface. Storm
water system improvements are to incorporate infiltration ability with volume and capacity
necessary to satisfy this requirement.
The existing site impervious surface is 2,822 sf. The proposed site impervious surface is
150,032 sf. The resulting net impervious surface increase is then 150,032 — 2,822 = 147,210 sf.
The project proposes collection of storm water runoff into a storm sewer system with perforated
pipe and an outlet control structure with an elevated discharge outlet pipe. The elevated
discharge outlet pipe provides containment of storm water volume within the system and allows
infiltration of storm water into natural granular soils at the site. Pretreatment of storm water
runoff within the system is provided by sumps incorporated into catch basins that collect runoff
into the system.
Infiltration Worksheet and Stage -Storage containment volume data printouts can be found in
Attached Appendix C.
The following table summarizes the calculation of required and proposed infiltration volumes:
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
Drainage Analysis Page 4
VOLUME ABSTRACTION 1.1" INFILTRATION
Item
New Impervious
1.1" Runoff
48 hr
System Storage
Surface Area
Volume
Infiltration
Volume Below
(sf)
Required
Volume
Outlet
(cf)
Capacity
(cf)
(cf)
Underground
147,210
13,494
45,523
35,993
Infiltration
System
Since abstraction of 1.1" rainfall on new impervious surface is achieved, City of Monticello
standards for water quality are also achieved.
SOILS DATA:
Soils in the project area are understood to be hydrologic Group A soil based on available soil
data provided web soil survey for the project site. Type A soils at the site allow for an infiltration
rate of 0.8 in/hr allowed by the MPCA Minnesota Storm Water Manual. Soils data for the site as
obtained to date can be found in attached Appendix D.
SUMMARY:
The calculations show that the proposed design provides reduced stormwater runoff flow rates,
achieves required volume control, and required water quality control for the proposed condition.
The project improvements and drainage analysis satisfy the City of Monticello requirements for
storm water management.
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am
a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Scott Dahlke, P.E.
Reg. No. 24348
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
Drainage Analysis
05/08/2017
Date
Page 5
APPENDIX A
Existing Conditions Drainage Calculations
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
Drainage Analysis
(S3)
Ex Cond Onsite
Ex Cond Onsite Draining
East
S2
Ex Cond Offsite Draining
East to Area S1
North
Ex Cond Onsite Draining
South
Ital Project
SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 00633 Ex Cond
Prepared by Hewlett-Packard, Printed 4/18/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 2
Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East
Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf)
CN Description
2,822
98 Impervious, HSG A
174,456
39 Pervious, HSG A
177,278
40 Weighted Average
174,456
98.41 % Pervious Area
2,822
1.59% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1
Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf, Depth= 0.06"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf)
CN Description
20,886
98 Impervious, HSG A
93,042
39 Pervious, HSG A
113,928
50 Weighted Average
93,042
81.67% Pervious Area
20,886
18.33% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North
Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A
11,215 39 Weighted Average
11,215 100.00% Pervious Area
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 3
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South
Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A
3,336 39 Weighted Average
3,336 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project
Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.02" for 2 -Year event
Inflow = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf
Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 4
Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East
Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 13.38 hrs, Volume= 1,271 cf, Depth= 0.09"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf)
CN Description
2,822
98 Impervious, HSG A
174,456
39 Pervious, HSG A
177,278
40 Weighted Average
174,456
98.41 % Pervious Area
2,822
1.59% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1
Runoff = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 3,704 cf, Depth= 0.39"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf)
CN Description
20,886
98 Impervious, HSG A
93,042
39 Pervious, HSG A
113,928
50 Weighted Average
93,042
81.67% Pervious Area
20,886
18.33% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North
Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.26 hrs, Volume= 62 cf, Depth= 0.07"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A
11,215 39 Weighted Average
11,215 100.00% Pervious Area
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 5
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South
Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.26 hrs, Volume= 18 cf, Depth= 0.07"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A
3,336 39 Weighted Average
3,336 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project
Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.20" for 10 -Year event
Inflow = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 5,056 cf
Outflow = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 5,056 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 6
Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East
Runoff = 2.34 cfs @ 12.39 hrs, Volume= 12,053 cf, Depth= 0.82"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf)
CN Description
2,822
98 Impervious, HSG A
174,456
39 Pervious, HSG A
177,278
40 Weighted Average
174,456
98.41 % Pervious Area
2,822
1.59% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1
Runoff = 4.19 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 15,456 cf, Depth= 1.63"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf)
CN Description
20,886
98 Impervious, HSG A
93,042
39 Pervious, HSG A
113,928
50 Weighted Average
93,042
81.67% Pervious Area
20,886
18.33% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North
Runoff = 0.23 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 695 cf, Depth= 0.74"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A
11,215 39 Weighted Average
11,215 100.00% Pervious Area
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 7
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South
Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 207 cf, Depth= 0.74"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A
3,336 39 Weighted Average
3,336 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project
Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.12" for 100 -Year event
Inflow = 6.59 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 28,410 cf
Outflow = 6.59 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 28,410 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
APPENDIX B
Proposed Conditions Drainage Calculations
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
Drainage Analysis
(S3)
Pro Cond Oi
Draining Ni
S1
Pro Cond Onsite to
System P 1
Under Ground System
and Basin
S2
Ex Cond Offsite
Draining East to Area
S1
Pro Cond Onsite
Draining South
I
Pro Cond Onsite
Draining East
Project
Subcat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 00633 Pro Cond
Prepared by CESD
HydroCADO 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2
Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to System
Runoff = 7.51 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 24,285 cf, Depth= 1.57"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
148,981
98
Impervious, HSG A
29,704
39
Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
6,422
49
50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A
185,107
87
Weighted Average
36,126
20.0
19.52% Pervious Area
148,981
80.48% Impervious Area
Tc Length
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet)
(ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0
Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1
Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf, Depth= 0.06"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf)
CN Description
20,886
98 Impervious, HSG A
93,042
39 Pervious, HSG A
113,928
50 Weighted Average
93,042
81.67% Pervious Area
20,886
18.33% Impervious Area
Tc Length
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet)
(ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0
Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North
Runoff = 0.04 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 86 cf, Depth= 0.46"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3
Area (sf)
CN Description
1,052
98 Impervious, HSG A
1,213
39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
2,265
66 Weighted Average
1,213
53.55% Pervious Area
1,052
46.45% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South
Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
1,517 39 Weighted Average
1,517 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East
Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
2,942 39 Weighted Average
2,942 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4
Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project
Inflow Area = 305,759 sf, 55.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.00" for 2 -Year event
Inflow = 0.04 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 86 cf
Outflow = 0.04 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 86 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Summary for Pond P1: Under Ground System and Basin
Inflow Area =
299,035 sf,
56.81 % Impervious,
Inflow Depth = 1.00" for 2 -Year event
Inflow =
7.51 cfs @
12.29 hrs, Volume=
24,861 cf
Outflow =
0.42 cfs @
14.02 hrs, Volume=
24,861 cf, Atten= 94%, Lag= 103.9 min
Discarded =
0.42 cfs @
14.02 hrs, Volume=
24,861 cf
Primary =
0.00 cfs @
0.00 hrs, Volume=
0 cf
Routing by Stor-Ind
method, Time
Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 957.82'
@ 14.02 hrs
Surf.Area= 22,730 sf Storage= 15,465 cf
Plug -Flow detention time= 408.1 min calculated for 24,858 cf (100% of inflow)
Center -of -Mass det. time= 408.1 min ( 1,227.0 - 818.8 )
Volume Invert
Avail.Storage Storaqe Description
#1 956.00'
13,966 cf 4.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 3.00'H Underground System Rock Encasement Z=
41,043 cf Overall - 6,129 cf Embedded = 34,914 cf x 40.0% Voids
#2 959.00'
7,613 cf 12.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 1.00'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0
25,376 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids
#3 957.00'
6,129 cf 24.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1
L= 1,951.0'
#4 957.00'
39,081 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc)
66,788 cf Total Available Storage
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area
(feet)
(sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft)
957.00
6,422 0 0 6,422
958.00
8,142 7,265 7,265 8,168
959.00
9,133 8,633 15,898 9,213
960.00
11,796 10,436 26,334 11,900
961.00
13,722 12,747 39,081 13,867
Device Routinq
Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded
956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area
#2 Primary
959.00' 15.0" Round Pipe Outlet
L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.00'/ 958.70' S=0.0167'/' Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf
00633 Pro Cond
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.42 cfs @ 14.02 hrs HW=957.82' (Free Discharge)
L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.42 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=956.00' (Free Discharge)
L2=Pipe Outlet ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Paae 5
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6
Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to System
Runoff = 13.25 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 43,227 cf, Depth= 2.80"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
148,981
98
Impervious, HSG A
29,704
39
Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
6,422
49
50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A
185,107
87
Weighted Average
36,126
20.0
19.52% Pervious Area
148,981
80.48% Impervious Area
Tc Length
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet)
(ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0
Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1
Runoff = 0.61 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 3,704 cf, Depth= 0.39"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf)
CN Description
20,886
98 Impervious, HSG A
93,042
39 Pervious, HSG A
113,928
50 Weighted Average
93,042
81.67% Pervious Area
20,886
18.33% Impervious Area
Tc Length
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet)
(ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0
Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North
Runoff = 0.12 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 226 cf, Depth= 1.20"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7
Area (sf)
CN Description
1,052
98 Impervious, HSG A
1,213
39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
2,265
66 Weighted Average
1,213
53.55% Pervious Area
1,052
46.45% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South
Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.24 hrs, Volume= 8 cf, Depth= 0.07"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
1,517 39 Weighted Average
1,517 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East
Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.24 hrs, Volume= 16 cf, Depth= 0.07"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
2,942 39 Weighted Average
2,942 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8
Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project
Inflow Area = 305,759 sf, 55.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.01" for 10 -Year event
Inflow = 0.12 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 250 cf
Outflow = 0.12 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 250 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 958.79' @ 15.28 hrs Surf.Area= 27,657 sf Storage= 32,257 cf
Plug -Flow detention time= 692.3 min calculated for 46,931 cf (100% of inflow)
Center -of -Mass det. time= 692.3 min ( 1,503.1 - 810.8 )
Volume Invert
Summary for Pond P1: Under Ground System and Basin
Inflow Area =
299,035 sf,
56.81 % Impervious,
Inflow Depth = 1.88" for 10 -Year event
Inflow =
13.69 cfs @
12.29 hrs, Volume=
46,931 cf
Outflow =
0.51 cfs @
15.28 hrs, Volume=
46,931 cf, Atten= 96%, Lag= 179.3 min
Discarded =
0.51 cfs @
15.28 hrs, Volume=
46,931 cf
Primary =
0.00 cfs @
0.00 hrs, Volume=
0 cf
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 958.79' @ 15.28 hrs Surf.Area= 27,657 sf Storage= 32,257 cf
Plug -Flow detention time= 692.3 min calculated for 46,931 cf (100% of inflow)
Center -of -Mass det. time= 692.3 min ( 1,503.1 - 810.8 )
Volume Invert
Avail.Storage Storaqe Description
#1 956.00'
13,966 cf 4.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 3.00'H Underground System Rock Encasement Z=
41,043 cf Overall - 6,129 cf Embedded = 34,914 cf x 40.0% Voids
#2 959.00'
7,613 cf 12.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 1.00'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0
25,376 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids
#3 957.00'
6,129 cf 24.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1
L= 1,951.0'
#4 957.00'
39,081 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc)
66,788 cf Total Available Storage
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area
(feet)
(sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft)
957.00
6,422 0 0 6,422
958.00
8,142 7,265 7,265 8,168
959.00
9,133 8,633 15,898 9,213
960.00
11,796 10,436 26,334 11,900
961.00
13,722 12,747 39,081 13,867
Device Routinq
Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded
956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area
#2 Primary
959.00' 15.0" Round Pipe Outlet
L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.00'/ 958.70' S=0.0167'/' Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf
00633 Pro Cond
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.51 cfs @ 15.28 hrs HW=958.79' (Free Discharge)
L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.51 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=956.00' (Free Discharge)
L2=Pipe Outlet ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Paae 9
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10
Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to System
Runoff = 24.92 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 83,478 cf, Depth= 5.41"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
148,981
98
Impervious, HSG A
29,704
39
Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
6,422
49
50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A
185,107
87
Weighted Average
36,126
20.0
19.52% Pervious Area
148,981
80.48% Impervious Area
Tc Length
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet)
(ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0
Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1
Runoff = 4.21 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 15,456 cf, Depth= 1.63"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf)
CN Description
20,886
98 Impervious, HSG A
93,042
39 Pervious, HSG A
113,928
50 Weighted Average
93,042
81.67% Pervious Area
20,886
18.33% Impervious Area
Tc Length
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet)
(ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.0
Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North
Runoff = 0.32 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 594 cf, Depth= 3.15"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11
Area (sf)
CN Description
1,052
98 Impervious, HSG A
1,213
39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
2,265
66 Weighted Average
1,213
53.55% Pervious Area
1,052
46.45% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South
Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 94 cf, Depth= 0.74"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
1,517 39 Weighted Average
1,517 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East
Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 182 cf, Depth= 0.74"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf) CN Description
0 98 Impervious, HSG A
2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
2,942 39 Weighted Average
2,942 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12
Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project
Inflow Area = 305,759 sf, 55.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 1.17" for 100 -Year event
Inflow = 4.03 cfs @ 12.94 hrs, Volume= 29,857 cf
Outflow = 4.03 cfs @ 12.94 hrs, Volume= 29,857 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 960.12' @ 12.94 hrs Surf.Area= 58,925 sf Storage= 55,432 cf
Plug -Flow detention time= 482.5 min calculated for 98,920 cf (100% of inflow)
Center -of -Mass det. time= 482.7 min ( 1,282.8 - 800.2 )
Volume Invert
Summary for Pond P1: Under Ground System and Basin
Inflow Area =
299,035 sf,
56.81 % Impervious,
Inflow Depth = 3.97" for 100 -Year event
Inflow =
28.99 cfs @
12.29 hrs, Volume=
98,934 cf
Outflow =
5.08 cfs @
12.94 hrs, Volume=
98,934 cf, Atten= 82%, Lag= 39.0 min
Discarded =
1.09 cfs @
12.94 hrs, Volume=
69,947 cf
Primary =
3.99 cfs @
12.94 hrs, Volume=
28,987 cf
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 960.12' @ 12.94 hrs Surf.Area= 58,925 sf Storage= 55,432 cf
Plug -Flow detention time= 482.5 min calculated for 98,920 cf (100% of inflow)
Center -of -Mass det. time= 482.7 min ( 1,282.8 - 800.2 )
Volume Invert
Avail.Storage Storaqe Description
#1 956.00'
13,966 cf 4.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 3.00'H Underground System Rock Encasement Z=
41,043 cf Overall - 6,129 cf Embedded = 34,914 cf x 40.0% Voids
#2 959.00'
7,613 cf 12.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 1.00'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0
25,376 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids
#3 957.00'
6,129 cf 24.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1
L= 1,951.0'
#4 957.00'
39,081 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc)
66,788 cf Total Available Storage
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area
(feet)
(sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft)
957.00
6,422 0 0 6,422
958.00
8,142 7,265 7,265 8,168
959.00
9,133 8,633 15,898 9,213
960.00
11,796 10,436 26,334 11,900
961.00
13,722 12,747 39,081 13,867
Device Routinq
Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded
956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area
#2 Primary
959.00' 15.0" Round Pipe Outlet
L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.00'/ 958.70' S=0.0167'/' Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf
00633 Pro Cond
Prepared by CESD
HydroCAD® 10.00-18
Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN
MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Discarded OutFlow Max=1.09 cfs @ 12.94 hrs HW=960.12' (Free Discharge)
L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 1.09 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=3.99 cfs @ 12.94 hrs HW=960.12' (Free Discharge)
L2=Pipe Outlet (Barrel Controls 3.99 cfs @ 4.56 fps)
Paae 13
APPENDIX C
Volume Abstraction 1.0" Rainfall on New Impervious Surface
and
Stage -Storage Containment Volume Data
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
Drainage Analysis
SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK, MONTICELLO, MN
INFILTRATION WORKSHEET
Requirements:
Infiltrate runoff generated from a 1.1" rainfall over the applicable new impervious
surface within 48 hours.
Step 1: Determine areas of impervious surfaces area and effective infiltration.
New impervious surface area = 150,032 sf
removed existing impervious surface = 2,822 sf
Net increase impervious surface = 150,032 - 2,822 = 147,210 sf
Effective Infiltration Area = Underground System + Infiltration Basin
Underground System = 1,951 if x 4 ft = 7,804 sf
Infiltration Basin = 6,422 sf at bottom contour 957 elevation
Total = 7,804 + 6,422 = 14,226 sf
Step 2: Calculate runoff volume from increase impervious surface generated by 1.1"
storm.
147,210 sf x 1.0 x 1.1 inch x 1 ft/l 2inch = 13,494 cf
Net Increased Coefficient Rainfall Volume
Impervious Required to be
Surface Area Infiltrated
Step 3: Calculate volume capacity of being infiltrated on site in 48 hours. Use
infiltration rate for Type A soils = 0.80 in/hr.
14,226 sf x 0.80 in/hr x 48 hrs x 1 ft/ 12inch = 45,523 cf
Effective Infiltration Volume
Infiltration Rate Capacity
Area in 48 Hours
Step 4: Compare volume capacity to volume required to be infiltrated.
45,523 cf
> 13,494 cf
Volume
Volume
Capacity
Required to be
in 48 Hours
Infiltrated
00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/30/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Stage -Area -Storage for Pond P1: Under Ground System and Basin
Elevation
Horizontal
Storage
Elevation
Horizontal
Storage
(feet)
(sq -ft)
(cubic -feet)
(feet)
(sq -ft)
(cubic -feet)
956.00
7,804
0
958.60
26,727
28,891
956.05
8,000
158
958.65
26,973
29,782
956.10
8,195
320
958.70
27,220
30,675
956.15
8,391
486
958.75
27,467
31,568
956.20
8,586
656
958.80
27,714
32,461
956.25
8,782
829
958.85
27,961
33,352
956.30
8,977
1,007
958.90
28,208
34,241
956.35
9,173
1,188
958.95
28,455
35,123
956.40
9,369
1,374
959.00
52,115
35,993
956.45
9,564
1,563
959.05
52,436
36,805
956.50
9,760
1,756
959.10
52,759
37,627
956.55
9,956
1,954
959.15
53,082
38,457
956.60
10,151
2,155
959.20
53,406
39,298
956.65
10,347
2,360
959.25
53,731
40,147
956.70
10,543
2,568
959.30
54,056
41,006
956.75
10,739
2,781
959.35
54,383
41,875
956.80
10,935
2,998
959.40
54,710
42,752
956.85
11,130
3,219
959.45
55,039
43,640
956.90
11,326
3,443
959.50
55,368
44,537
956.95
11,522
3,672
959.55
55,698
45,443
957.00
18,140
3,904
959.60
56,029
46,360
957.05
18,417
4,488
959.65
56,361
47,285
957.10
18,695
5,100
959.70
56,694
48,221
957.15
18,973
5,732
959.75
57,027
49,166
957.20
19,251
6,381
959.80
57,362
50,122
957.25
19,531
7,047
959.85
57,697
51,087
957.30
19,810
7,727
959.90
58,033
52,062
957.35
20,091
8,421
959.95
58,370
53,047
957.40
20,371
9,128
960.00
58,708
54,042
957.45
20,653
9,848
960.05
58,801
54,634
957.50
20,935
10,580
960.10
58,894
55,230
957.55
21,217
11,324
960.15
58,988
55,832
957.60
21,500
12,078
960.20
59,082
56,438
957.65
21,783
12,844
960.25
59,176
57,049
957.70
22,067
13,620
960.30
59,271
57,664
957.75
22,352
14,406
960.35
59,366
58,285
957.80
22,637
15,202
960.40
59,461
58,910
957.85
22,922
16,008
960.45
59,557
59,540
957.90
23,208
16,823
960.50
59,653
60,174
957.95
23,495
17,647
960.55
59,749
60,814
958.00
23,782
18,479
960.60
59,846
61,458
958.05
24,027
19,319
960.65
59,943
62,107
958.10
24,271
20,165
960.70
60,041
62,761
958.15
24,516
21,017
960.75
60,139
63,420
958.20
24,761
21,875
960.80
60,237
64,084
958.25
25,006
22,737
960.85
60,336
64,753
958.30
25,251
23,605
960.90
60,435
65,426
958.35
25,497
24,476
960.95
60,534
66,105
958.40
25,743
25,353
961.00
60,634
66,788
958.45
25,988
26,233
958.50
26,234
27,116
958.55
26,481
28,002
APPENDIX D
Soils Data
Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN
Drainage Analysis
a
Dundas Pd
e
s
Z
O
Q
O
LL
Z
Ca
G
z
LU
0
Lu
J
a
f: M
O O
(O N N
N ° 95 «. 91 Q O V c9
7 y @ co C' 9) y I a' a a
91 O ,� m m m r 9S � a m N O o
m °Toa a° r- o m Co o c
-O O U V) N m Q v1 7 V°i N — O)
M.N
w a a m
m O v c0 p n m� �' N 7 v E .w Q O
N 'Q_ @@ — -1 m m co a U) N O m y
Cl) 9s @ a E 'a m CO O m 0 a) U w� o g y� .: c
N ° y° t ° @moo 5 m
3 y 0)m o y U) a y a):2m Z �N 3
@
@° `O ;Q@@
ac
m
mn3 U @ nt y9Cl)
U c9 m O Q
w E 0m ICL
coa
0 a) U
T �CQ 9)
N > 0 U�°OOw o E>'c .
° om m E m� Oo
0°°a ° m
E ,�wLa)omoos iai'ano a
Q Uym > — 2o Q.OQO 2— .09 v
co E NCyE Oo
0) o N
O�
w E0) w Z�� >mLaim� a°i:? m o'rnaa)
>. o a O V7 Q m T aa) �'' f0 f0 7 C a m Q N O -0 N O-
m — c�� O� m�� yea c Q ..as m o-0Qm
cn tp a°i Ern > E �<p m @ 0 z o 0 am D E
N O m a �' ° 'p 6 D O m N O m Q Q O 9) a -° O
o
C:)
c o a 91 m 7 m N > 3 T O O
O al 0 fL `� 'O U C i Q O m e
cn 'L Q m co y y m (/� m O Q
N 91 O 91 co" Q N m 7 y� _ O y N
>@ C N C O U m p >> m p 9) O to _� U 's w 'p 7 'p �? 95 p t 0 t
H > W _ U y a E u) > U 2 a'a Q 95 H O (n (n (n — D N H U ._ y
T
m
Z
3
U)
(D O
Z U)
7 m
— 9s
O m
U) n
-0
i y y j 0
76 as T >
cc
CL LL U r- as c
U) a) a 0 N N p
Nd C J a7 m O O @ L Z
Q O O.N m p W af a
.0 C Z, N N i y O 0 @
O L_ y _ a) U
CL 0 U) CL U) > 0 U) CO O w S � J a a
a1
au�o O d16
a 1 [[
co
M
y wOL
° m CD = oca U)
0 S o a 2 0
`
y a w a N N m
a a d a a
U)y d sU o o w o
O o m m m d 3 U) � a T= a ° o 0 > 0 0
Q co a 3 o T y > > m i v ami c > Y a) a
N .0 •O •� C O Z5 2 O (i0 2 N N @ C_ N O O @ a7 ID C � O
d a U U U '0 m m U U iD (D J J a a' U co U U U fn
m a m
CL
cn
� y
0
y O
m �
tL m
7 y
w 0
l6 O
Z U
Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota
Map Unit Legend
Wright County, Minnesota (MN171)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
406 Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 5.5 100.0%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 5.5 100.0%
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/24/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Engineering Properties (MN) ---Wright County, Minnesota
Engineering Properties (MN)
This table gives the engineering classifications and the range of engineering
properties for the layers of each soil in the survey area.
Hydrologic group is a group of soils having similar runoff potential under similar
storm and cover conditions. Soil properties that influence runoff potential are
those that influence the minimum rate of infiltration for a bare soil after prolonged
wetting and when not frozen. These properties are depth to a seasonal high
water table, saturated hydraulic conductivity after prolonged wetting, and depth to
a layer with a very slow water transmission rate. Changes in soil properties
caused by land management or climate changes also cause the hydrologic soil
group to change. The influence of ground cover is treated independently. There
are four hydrologic soil groups, A, B, C, and D, and three dual groups, A/D, B/D,
and C/D. In the dual groups, the first letter is for drained areas and the second
letter is for undrained areas.
The four hydrologic soil groups are described in the following paragraphs:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively
drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well
drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of
water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay
layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious
material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated.
Texture is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture. These terms are defined according to percentages of sand, silt, and
clay in the fraction of the soil that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. "Loam,"
for example, is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 28 to 50 percent silt, and less than
52 percent sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is 15 percent or
more, an appropriate modifier is added, for example, "gravelly."
Classification of the soils is determined according to the Unified soil classification
system (ASTM, 2005) and the system adopted by the American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO, 2004).
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/24/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
Engineering Properties (MN) ---Wright County, Minnesota
The Unified system classifies soils according to properties that affect their use as
construction material. Soils are classified according to particle -size distribution of
the fraction less than 3 inches in diameter and according to plasticity index, liquid
limit, and organic matter content. Sandy and gravelly soils are identified as GW,
GP, GM, GC, SW, SP, SM, and SC; silty and clayey soils as ML, CL, OL, MH,
CH, and OH; and highly organic soils as PT. Soils exhibiting engineering
properties of two groups can have a dual classification, for example, CL -ML.
The AASHTO system classifies soils according to those properties that affect
roadway construction and maintenance. In this system, the fraction of a mineral
soil that is less than 3 inches in diameter is classified in one of seven groups
from A-1 through A-7 on the basis of particle -size distribution, liquid limit, and
plasticity index. Soils in group A-1 are coarse grained and low in content of fines
(silt and clay). At the other extreme, soils in group A-7 are fine grained. Highly
organic soils are classified in group A-8 on the basis of visual inspection.
If laboratory data are available, the A-1, A-2, and A-7 groups are further
classified as A -1-a, A -1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, A-2-6, A-2-7, A-7-5, or A-7-6. As an
additional refinement, the suitability of a soil as subgrade material can be
indicated by a group index number. Group index numbers range from 0 for the
best subgrade material to 20 or higher for the poorest.
Rock fragments larger than 10 inches in diameter and 3 to 10 inches in diameter
are indicated as a percentage of the total soil on a dry -weight basis. The
percentages are estimates determined mainly by converting volume percentage
in the field to weight percentage.
Percentage (of soil particles) passing designated sieves is the percentage of the
soil fraction less than 3 inches in diameter based on an ovendry weight. The
sieves, numbers 4, 10, 40, and 200 (USA Standard Series), have openings of
4.76, 2.00, 0.420, and 0.074 millimeters, respectively. Estimates are based on
laboratory tests of soils sampled in the survey area and in nearby areas and on
estimates made in the field.
Liquid limit and plasticity index (Atterberg limits) indicate the plasticity
characteristics of a soil. The estimates are based on test data from the survey
area or from nearby areas and on field examination.
References:
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of
sampling and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard
classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/24/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Z
�
$
4)
E
@
CL
0
L-
a.
tm
�
.�
�
�
.7
�
W
�
0
�
�
�
k$ »
G- z a a
a z z z z
\ / 0
i
2 \ $ \ r r
c
§ ■ $ OP/ ?
.LD
2 / 3 3
@ 8
E a \ <
& \ ( / \
f
§ le/ @ g
a \ \ $ \
2 U)
/ f A j CL /
C§ • 0 0 6
E U)
7LLA ) ¢
0 - c o c o
( ¥ / \
4 C 1- 3
ƒ k § 4 a** 4 f
§
; � ]
tE e % \ e CO ƒ §
0 \° CO \ \
a
7 e o\ m m
"y %± ± $a >
\ ) E 4) )ƒ»0 )ƒb§\\
/ « {f \m ;±&m ;2§m
Ul
\ ƒf\{ ƒ\\/\(
/$°33 /))\m2 §mm=mg
)ee 2 200
§ m &
\ _ \ PI -
C6
/50
_ 0) m
)CL - co
2E
k >D
.0 \ k
�r \}
E0.
wc�
E_
m
£ \/\ j
«
wn
\
2
z
S
§\
0
kC
z3
0
1WSB
Building a legacy — Your legacy.
May 31, 2017
Ms. Angela Schumann
Community Development Director
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Spaeth Industrial Park
Preliminary Development Stage PUD -Site Plan Review
City Project No. 2017-017
WSB Project No. 02596-420
Dear Ms. Schumann:
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
We have reviewed the civil plans, dated May 8, 2017 and the drainage analysis dated May 8,
2017, as prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design and offer the following comments below and
on the enclosed is a stormwater plan review checklist.
Stormwater Management
1. Proposed stormwater management for the site includes an underground infiltration
system consisting of perforated storm sewer under a majority of the paved areas with
0% grades and an infiltration basin along the south property line. The ultimate
discharge elevation of this system to the ditch along Dundas Road is at an elevation
of 958.7 feet which is 1.7 feet above the infiltration system elevation of 957.0. This
creates a situation where, apart from infiltration, runoff will only leave the site after
water builds up 1.7 feet. In the event that the infiltration system plugs up and fails, the
underground pipe network will be filled with water. Flat pipes across the entire site
will likely result in maintenance problems. This is not an ideal or a recommended
design if not properly maintained, as it could create a risk for on-site flooding. City
staff has discussed alternate stormwater management techniques with the applicant,
such as outletting the system to the south east corner of the property and directing it
to the ditch/channel that serves the industrial park or filling the site to provide a
positive outlet. There are additional property constraints and costs associated with
these alternatives that the applicant has reviewed and has chosen not to undertake.
Ultimately the proposed stormwater management system is privately owned and
maintained and should not impact the City's ditch/channel system and adjacent
properties if properly maintained.
Equal Opportunity Employer
wsbeng.com
K:\02596-420\Adm1n\Docs\050817 submittal
Spaeth Industrial Park
May 31, 2017
Page 2
2. An operation and maintenance plan for the stormwater management system is
required. The City will provide an operation and maintenance plan for the owner to
sign. At a minimum the plan will include: an inspection schedule/frequency for the
infiltration system and maintenance schedule for cleaning out the sumps. The
proposed site design must provide for a means to visually inspect and maintain the
entire system. This will require visual ports throughout the site, in order to locate and
repair problem areas if the system fails.
3. The infiltration system should be designed to provide a means to visually verify that
the system is discharging through the soil surface within 48 hours or less. Also, the
system must be designed for adequate maintenance access.
4. The NRCS Soil Survey indicates HSG B soils throughout the site and contributing
offsite area. The HydroCAD model and narrative should be updated to reflect type B
soils. Infiltration rates surrounding the perforated pipe system should be updated
according to those listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual.
5. Depth to groundwater and bedrock must be confirmed in the proposed infiltration
areas to ensure infiltration is not being proposed within 3 feet of the seasonally high
water table or bedrock. This information should be obtained from a soil boring
investigation. Soil classifications from the investigation can be used for preliminary
design purposes. Soil borings should extend to a minimum of 5 feet below the
bottom of the infiltration practice. The lowest (i.e. most restrictive) infiltration rate
within 5 feet shall be used for design purposes.
6. Because the entire site is underlain by the infiltration area, confirmation of design
infiltration rates during construction should be completed. The infiltration system
needs to be confirmed that it will function as it was designed with preliminary
estimates. This can be accomplished by performing infiltration testing, such as
double ring infiltrometer tests. The MPCA guide for determining the number of
infiltration tests and borings is provided here:
7rereaitormwater control measure (BMF)(ft)
i000 to 5000
50M to 40000
(>1©U00
borings Fits Fermeameter tests
5
2 2 10
3 3 15
41 41 202
'an additional soil boring or pit should be completed for each additional 2,509 fr above 12,500 fit=
tan additional five permeameter tests should be completed for each additional 3,W ft2 alawe 15,004 dtt
KA02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\SpaethDrainageReview 053117.doa
Spaeth Industrial Park
May 31, 2017
Page 3
7. Soils that have infiltration rates more than 8.3 inches per hour must be amended to
slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour, per the CSWGP. The CSWGP
does allow for the local unit of government (the City) flexibility with this rate criteria.
8. Provide rational method calculations confirming adequacy of the storm sewer design
for the 10 -year storm event. Calculations should adhere to the following guidelines:
• The rational method runoff coefficient (c) is designated by land use and
should be assigned a value no less than 0.7.
• Minimum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 3.0 fps
• Maximum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 12.0 fps
9. Rate control is assumed to be accommodated in the existing north -south ditch/channel
and downstream pond located on the north side of Chelsea Road, just west of Fallon
Avenue at the City's water reservoir site. The applicant has indicated they are
providing rate control with the infiltration system and shall revise the system as
needed.
10. Grading, drainage and erosion control shall comply with City's zoning ordinance. See
Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and
erosion control and the City's Design Manual- updated May 2017 located on the
City's website- Engineering department.
HvdroCAD Model
11. The proposed stoimwater management system (as it currently is designed) should be
modeled with a starting water elevation of 958.7 feet for establishing the 100 year
HWL elevation.
12. Proposed discharge rates exceed existing in the 2 -year event. Rates should be
summarized at each point of discharge from the site (North, East and South).
13. Time of concentrations should be updated to more accurately reflect the proposed
subcatchments based on land cover and average slope.
14. There is a discrepancy in the primary outlet device from Pond Pl, labelled 15" in the
model and 18" in the plans. If the pipe is designed to be an 18 -inch RCP, additional
rip -rap is required (3.6 CY rather than 2.9 CY).
SWPPP
Refer to the MPCA's SWPPP Checklist for a complete list of requirements.
15. Describe the procedures to amend the SWPPP and establish additional ESC BMPs as
necessary.
16. Describe methods used to minimize soil compaction and preserve topsoil
K:\02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\SpaethDmInageReview 053117.do
Spaeth Industrial Park
May 31, 2017
Page 4
17. Since 1 acre or more of the site is being disturbed, a NPDES/SDS Construction Storm
Water General Permit and SWPPP shall be provided with the grading permit or with
the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing.
18. The SWPPP mentions select roof drainage is directed to the wetland adjacent to the
south property boundary. This note is incorrect.
Site Plan
19. Provide a truck turning template for a semi -truck accessing the truck access areas on
the site. The applicant has indicated that semi trucks will not be entering the site,
however it does, the City would like a template showing how circulation will be
accomplished and the ability for trucks to be contained within the curbed area.
Grading and Drainage Plan
20. Clearly define an emergency overflow elevation (EOF) on the plans.
Sanitary and Water Utilitv Plan
21. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any
additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built
elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction.
22. The development agreement will include language on City maintenance of the
sanitary sewer mainline and watermain system within the site.
23. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior
to commencement of utility connections.
24. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete.
Storm Sewer Utilitv Plan
25. Confirm that the HDPE perforated pipe being proposed under pavement throughout
the site is designed to handle the loads it will experience.
26. Label the storm sewer pipe between CB -3 and CB -5.
Site Details
27. It is recommended to add a trash guard for flared end sections per City Detail 4007.
28. Include City Detail 6003- Mud Mat Construction Entrance.
K:\02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\Spaeth Dr inageRevie% 053117.doa
Spaeth Industrial Park
May 31, 2017
Page 5
29. Include City Detail
30. Applicable detail plates shall be updated per the City's April 2017 General
Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located
on the City's website- Engineering department.
Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please
give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Shibani K. Bisson, PE
City Engineer
cc: Steve Grittman, NAC
skb
K:\0259"20\Admin\Docs\0508175ubmittal\SpaethDrainageReview 053117.doa
t ;•«.- =..r i �'� �r Jst <rtt w... 4',t• ra la-:.. � •tr« i •{���a`.,, .
.- . 41. ;'•i/r9 .7 �{:;e � _'`. 'i'r �:! .•�`r T e«."•'• +•1��� . -. - .. ..�ra - 1Qwk •
f� >�<-tit ' }'- � • .t�„ ` '�t ..`, •w ! , �, tt
,r•'�''. :i"<'"1's: i� p tl�►r ,ri �:. i1, •'".: �• ,t►+. `�. _ - m s s, • t"iit T's".�v�i ., r" •ii � , c
� a M �
' • • i �.'r , � is ir•�, r1 >•�/�+. �`f
t
AMoCIiiAo
City of Monticello — Stormwater Site Plan
Review
107 Dundas Road,
Address: Monticello, MN Permit No:
PID: I Date Approved:
Date Received: 5/12/2017 Signature:
Area of
Site Size (acres): 14.40 Disturbance(acres): 1 4.60
ExistingI Proposed
Impervious (acres): 0.06 Impervious (acres): 1 3.38
A Stormwater Management Plan is required for:
Any land disturbing activity that may ultimately result in the addition of one acre or
greater of impervious surfaces, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common
plan of development that may be constructed at different times.
The construction of any new public or private road; or
- Any land disturbance activity, regardless of size, that the City determines is likely to cause
an adverse impact to an environmentally sensitive area or other property.
Submittals Received
Date Document Author
5/8/17 Preliminary Plat, Spaeth Industrial Park Scott Dahlke, Civil
Engineering Site Design
5/8/17 Civil Site Plans, Spaeth Industrial Park Scott Dahlke, Civil
Engineering Site Design
5/Scott Dahlke, Civil8;'17 Drainage Analysis, Spaeth Industrial Park Engineering Site Design
5/5/17I Spaeth Project Narrative I Ken Spaeth, Ken Spaeth
Masonry
General Site Plan
Yes
No
1. Scale of Survey. Minimum scale 1" = 50'. Maximum size plan sheet 24" x 36"
®
❑
2. Survey signed by a registered survey with elevations in NGVD-1929 datum for the
following locations:
• Each lot corner
®
❑
• Grade elevation at the foundation and elevation of top of foundation of structures on
N
❑
adjacent lots
• Grade elevation at the foundation, elevation of top of foundation and garage floor of
©
❑
proposed new construction
• Lowest point of entry (i.e. door sill or top of window well) of proposed and existing
©
7
construction
• Lowest floor of proposed and existing construction
®
❑
3. Any proposed retaining wall must have a top and bottom elevation and bottom elevation
❑
❑
would be finish grade. Also, no retaining wall is allowed to be built on private property
October 2016
4. Retaining walls greater than 4.0 feet in height have been designed and certified by a
❑
❑
licensed professional engineer and a building permit has been acquired
9.
Waste control
5. All drainage and utility easements are shown?
N
❑
6. Easements are clear of any encroachments?
N
❑
7. New curb cuts proposed?
❑
❑
8. If new curb cut is proposed, stamp all survey maps with the curb cut stamp. Also, write a
N
❑
note on the Residential Plan & Routing Approval form reminding the builder that a curb
❑
❑
cut permit is required if the driveway is moved or a new driveway is added
N
❑
9. Low floor a minimum of 4.25' (feet) above the sanitary sewer invert elevation
N
❑
Comments:
N
❑
Erosion/Sediment Control Plan
Yes
1. SWPPP notes provided on the plan
2. Temporary stabilization measures provided
3. Erosion control blankets provided on all slopes greater than 3:1
4. Perimeter Control i.e., Silt Fence, Filter Log, etc.
5. Phasing for sites that are > 1 acre
6. CB Inlet Protection
7.
Dewatering
8.
Sediment control
9.
Waste control
10.
Concrete washout
11.
Rock entrance
N
N
El
N
N
12. Street sweeping schedule ❑
13. Permanent restoration plan N
14. Erosion protection at all outlet pipes N
15. SWPPP includes an erosion and sediment control inspection schedule and person ❑
responsible for maintenance
Comments:
A street sweeping schedule needs to be added to the SWPPP.
FI
Provide the name and contact information of the person responsible for SWPPP implementation and long term
operations and maintenance of the permanent stormwater management system, including certification number.
Stormwater Management Plan
'1
Yes 4
No 4
1. Delineation maps for existing and proposed conditions
N
❑
2. Modeling calculations for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 storm events
with an MSE3 type distribution.
• 2 year 24 hr. (2.84"), 10 year 24 hr. (4.22"), 100 (6.87"), 10 -day snowmelt (7.211)
N
❑
• Modeled direct connected impervious separate
N
❑
3. Off-site drainage included
N
❑
4. Wetlands shown on plans and wetland permitting completed
❑
N
5. Pretreatment
N
❑
October 2016
6.
Skimmer structures provided on the outlets of all ponds.
❑
❑
7.
Soil borings
❑
N
8.
Design Infiltration Rate Determination — Geotechnical Report or Infiltration Testing
❑
❑
8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria
provided
❑
9. If infiltration of LF' is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site?
9.
Seasonal High Water Elevation
❑
10.
Open channel flow calculations
❑
171
11.
Storm sewer calculations — 10 year event
❑
N
12.
Narrative describing the following:
a. Existing Conditions: Yes
b. Proposed Conditions: Yes
c. Stormwater Management for Proposed
Site: Yes
Comments:
Separation distance from bottom of infiltration features to seasonally high water table and bedrock must be
determined.
Amended soils are being proposed within infiltration basin, but soil borings should be taken to confirm
infiltration rates of the soils surrounding the perforated pipe (MRCS soil survey indicates HSG B)
Provide operation and maintenance plans for the sumps and infiltration system.
Water Quality and Volume Reduction
"The Chy of Monticello has adopted MPC4 Minimal Impact Design Standards in Chapter 4 of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
Section 4.10. MIDs Infiltration design criteria as described in the MPC4 Stormwater Manual .shall be followed for the proposed
project. "
Yes 4 No �
1. Volume control provided as per the City's Engineering Design Standards and M1DS (1.1" ® ❑
over new impervious surface)
2. Impervious area equal to or greater than the net increase in impervious surface is routed ® ❑
through infiltration BMP
3. Sequencing provided for alternatives where infiltration is infeasible ❑ ❑
13494
4. Required Volume Reduction: Cf
5. Provided Volume Reduction:
35993cf
6. Separation to groundwater and/or bedrock is a minimum of 3 feet from bottom of
❑
infiltration BMP
7. Drawdown time for infiltration BMP is within 48 hours
N
❑
8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria
❑
❑
9. If infiltration of LF' is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site?
❑
❑
Comments:
Rate Control I
Yes J No 4 1
October 2016
1. Peak Proposed Discharge Rates < Existing ❑ N
2. Existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 year storm? ❑ ❑
3. Existing infrastructure and EOF for proposed 100 year peak discharge rate? ❑ N
4. Proposed flow patterns do not create flooding impacts for structures adjacent to the N ❑
property?
Comments:
Rates exceeded in 2 -year event
Provide rational storm sewer design sheet to demonstrate existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge
rates for 10 -year
Define an EOF for 100 -year event
Yes J No
1. Building Opening:
• 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins
N ❑
• 2' above EOF of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins
N ❑
• 2' above the 100 -yr flow elevation of a swale or channel at the point where the swale
N ❑
channel is closest to the building
2. Low Floor Elevation:
• 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of major basins
N ❑
• 2' above EOF of major basins
® ❑
• For landlocked basins: 2' above the HWL from back to back 100 -yr rainfalls or 2'
above the HWL from the 100 -yr 10 -day snowmelt, whichever is higher. Starting
elevation of the basin/waterbody prior to runoff is one of the following:
o Existing Ordinary High Water level established by the Minnesota Department
❑ ❑
of Natural Resources
o Annual water balance calculation approved by the City
❑ ❑
o Local observation well records, as approved by the City
❑ ❑
o Mottled soil
❑ ❑
October 2016
Council Meeting — 06/26/2017
2L. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 671A amending the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls, Chapter 4, Section 5 for
regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations
on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for
Temporary Uses — Food Trucks (JS)
A. REFERANCE AND BACKGROUND:
On June 12, 2017 the City Council adopted Ordinance 671 amending the Monticello
Zoning Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter 4, Section 5 for
regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on
Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses —
Food Trucks. Due to the lengthy nature of the ordinance, staff is asking Council to adopt
a summary ordinance. The summary ordinance will be used for publication as required
by state statutes. Summary ordinances are typically brought forward at the same time as
the original ordinance, however, this was not presented on June 12.
Al. Budget Impact: Approving this item will significantly reduce the cost of
publishing the full ordinance.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: NA.
B. ALTERNATIVES ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt Summary Ordinance 671A amending the Monticello Zoning Ordinance
Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -
tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings
and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks
2. Motion to deny.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
• Draft Summary Ordinance 671A
SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 671A
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING
CODE FOR CHAPTER 4, SECTION 3 — FENCES AND WALLS; CHAPTER 4,
SECTION 5 FOR REGULATIONS FOR MULTI -TENANT BUILDING SIGNAGE,
CHAPTER 5, SECTION 3 FOR REGULATIONS ON ACCESSORY USE DWELLINGS
AND CHAPTER 5, SECTION 4 FOR REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY USES —
FOOD TRUCKS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on June 12, 2017, Ordinance No. 671 was adopted
by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Due to the lengthy nature of
Ordinance No. 671, the following Summary Ordinance No. 671A has been prepared for
publication as authorized by state law.
The ordinance adopted by the Council amends Title 10 of the Monticello Zoning Code.
The general purpose of the ordinance amendments are to clarify various chapters and sections
with changes to the following:
4.3: Fences and Walls
4.5: Signs - Multi -tenant Building Signage
5.3: Accessory Use Standards
5.4: Temporary Uses — Food Trucks
A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during
the City's regular office hours. The complete ordinance will be posted on the City's website
following publication.
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, this
26th day of June, 2017.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator
VOTING IN FAVOR:
VOTING IN OPPOSITION:
City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017
2M Consideration call for a public hearing on Julv 11, 2017 by the Monticello
Planning Commission on the amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan
for adoption of the Downtown Small Area Plan. Applicant: Citv of Monticello
(AS)
Property: City of Monticello
Planning Case Number: 2017-023
A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND
The City Council is asked to direct that a public hearing be held by the Monticello
Planning Commission on a comprehensive plan amendment for the adoption of the
Downtown Small Area Plan.
Similar to the Embracing Downtown Plan, the Downtown Small Area Plan is
proposed as an appendix to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. The Downtown
Small Area Plan provides guidance on land use, economic development, parks, and
transportation components of the Comprehensive Plan specific to the core downtown
area. As such, a comprehensive plan amendment to incorporate the document and
amend text within the existing Comprehensive Plan is necessary. Comprehensive
Plan amendments require a public hearing process.
The Parks Commission reviewed the plan on May 26th, recommending that it move
forward to the City Council for adoption. The EDA will review the plan on June 21St
for recommendation to the Council. The next step in the review process prior to
Council consideration of the Downtown Small Area Plan is Planning Commission's
public hearing for the related Comprehensive Plan amendments and the
Commission's review and recommendation on the Downtown Small Area Plan.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to call for a public hearing by the Monticello Planning Commission on
July 11th, 2017 to consider amendments to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan
for adoption of the Downtown Small Area Plan.
2. Motion to table action for additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1 above. The Downtown Small Area Plan process has
followed the scope of work laid out in the contract for the project and is in draft form
for review and public hearing by the Planning Commission.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Public Hearing Notice
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statute 13D.04, notice is hereby given that a public
hearing of the Monticello Planning Commission is scheduled to consider the following matter:
TIME: 6:00 p.m.
DATE: Tuesday, July 11th, 2017
HEARING LOCATION: Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
HEARING SUBJECT: Consideration of a request for amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan for adoption of the Downtown Small
Area Study
PROPERTY LOCATION: City of Monticello
APPLICANT: City of Monticello
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
Oral testimony will be accepted on the above subjects, and all persons desiring to be heard on
referenced subjects will be heard at this meeting. Written comments may be taken at the
Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362 until the date of the
hearing. Questions may be directed to the City of Monticello at 763-295-2711.
Note: Recommendations of the Planning Commission will be subject to the approval or denial
of the City Council.
Date Posted: June 19th, 2017
Date Published: June 29th, 2017
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
2N. Consideration of avvrovin2 installation of new electrical service at Well House #2 by
Olson & Sons Electric (OSE) for $12,259 and Xcel Energv for $12,912.85 (total of
$25,171.85) (MT)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City Council is asked to consider the installation of a new electrical service for Well #2
located at 209 Cedar Street. Well #2 was installed in 1970, and currently Xcel Energy
supplies a service drop to Well House #1 (132 E. Broadway), consisting of 240v Delta 3
phase power. At the point of attachment to Well House #1, there are a set of current
transformers mounted on the mast. On the load side of the current transformers there are
service conductors feeding Well House #1 and an underground lateral feeding Well House #2,
approximately 250' feet away. Each of the well houses have independent service equipment
and soft starter equipment sized to accommodate a 100 HP motor.
Due to higher water demands in the City of Monticello, it is necessary to run both of these
motors simultaneously, something that has been avoided in the past due to service installation.
It has been determined to comfortably run both wells simultaneously, these well houses need
to have separate services.
In the 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan we have a new well (Well #6) on schedule for 2019,
in the amount of $1.2 million. We have been pushing that back for the past eight years, and if
we install the new electrical service to Well #2, we can keep pushing that back another five or
more years.
The cost to install a separate electrical service to the well house is $12,912.85 for Xcel Energy
to add a 3-phase pole on Cedar Street between the alley and 3rd Street, 3-phase transformer
bank, and overhead service to the building. The new incoming service would be 400 amps,
208 volts, 3-phase fed, approximately 25' from the northeast corner of Well House #2.
Wes Olson Electric came in with the lowest quote to run the new electrical service overhead
for $10,013. This would include removing the service lateral from Well House #1 feeding
Well House #2 and establish an independent service at Well House #2. They would supply
and install everything that is listed in the RFP (which is in the supporting data).
To run the new electrical service underground from the new Xcel Energy pole, Olson & Sons
Electric (OSE) had the lowest quote of $12,259. This would include removing the service
lateral from Well House #1 feeding Well House #2 and establish an independent service at
Well House #2. They would supply and install everything that is listed in the RFP.
Al. Budget Impact: The appropriate funds will be allocated from the Water Improvement
Fund for the installation of the new electrical service at Well House #2.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: Installing the new electrical service to Well House #2 is
minimal.
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve installation of a new electrical service for Well House #2 for the total
of $25,171.85, including the new pole from Xcel Energy and underground service
installed by Olson & Sons Electric. Staff is recommending the underground service due
to the revitalization of Block #34, as the underground installation is preferred and less
complicated for future development and expansion.
2. Motion to approve installation of a new electrical service for Well House #2 for the total
of $22,925.85, including the new pole from Xcel Energy and above -ground service
installed by Wes Olson Electric.
3. Motion to deny the installation of a new electrical service to Well House #2 at this time.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends Alternative 1 — installation of new electrical for Well House #2 for a
total of $25,171.85, including the new pole from Xcel Energy and underground service
installed by Olson & Sons Electric.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Quote tabulation for electrical improvements by contractor
B. Xcel Energy cost for second service on Cedar Street
C. City of Monticello Capital Improvement Plan for Well No#6
D. History of Wells #1 and #2 motor sizes and GPM
E. City of Monticello historic maximum water demand
F. RFQ
d
W epi
CO W
J Q
N
N
F
N
00
O
N
O w
W
O
N
N
a
W
N�
z
z Q
Z
W
p
Z
Q
W
U
l"I
F
it
�
N
O
O
�
w
z
O
�
�
V
O
Q
m
O
WWc
W
~
�
�i
N
Il1
p
N
Z
:) W
0 Q
C7 z
�
J
O
N
�
O'
ci
W
M
O
Q
LL
D
cc
u0
W
W
u
W
U
z
z
W
J
W
W
=
LL
O
O
H
I
j
N
o
�
K
F.
g
O
7
a
W
d
W epi
CO W
J Q
N
N
N
00
O
N
O w
W
N
a
z
z Q
p
W
Q
W
U
it
�
N
O
O
�
Q
N
Z
:) W
0 Q
C7 z
N
N
N
w
H
ci
W
M
O
w
D
cc
vN
W
W
_
z
z
W
�
LL
O
O
I
j
N
o
�
K
F.
g
W
w
7
a
c0
�
F
m
W
Q
�
3
N
O
Z
O
U
yR
O
N
N
z
Q
p
~
C
O
c
Q
co W
p
~
F
O
~
Q
N
wO
x O
ZO w
U O
U
W
z
O
A
z
O
�
Ln
L!1
J
z0
2
U
z
O
O
w
LM
Ln
0
W
0
2
V
C
W
W
p
p
p
N
o
Ln
'A
zzcc
O
W
O
2
U
U
W
p
Q
>
K
Y
w
c0
oc
O
N
W
N
a
z
O
p
W
W
U
K
N
Q
N
w
H
�.-
O
w
D
O
vN
W
W
_
z
z
�
LL
O
O
I
j
N
�
K
F.
g
W
w
7
c0
�
F
�
W
Q
�
3
Z
O
U
i
p
w
z
=
Q
~
c
Q
ccW
F
Q
N
I
0
Y
G
9
L
Q
M
ai
O
Q
L
Q
m
a)
L
Y
L
°
W
N
N
°
U
N
L
H
W
N
N
Ol
N
N
N
O
N
Ca)
E
0
V
a)
3
w
L
V
O
Y
v
3
°
Q
E
75_
°-
o
V
N
0
01
Y
d
♦+
W
W
0
(ai
a
E
U
N
<
d Q
c
°
y_
V N
d
3
�
L
C
U
C
O
N
C
v
O
w
Q
U N
v
u
y
a)
N
O
t T'a�
a
A N m E
N
L
9 FL -9
C
Z Lo CO U
O m
N
O
m
a
E
a
ai
r m
O
0
N
d O N C
L
w O M
a
to
C UCO °
r X
L
C
N
�'aLn
Q y C
c °U
0L
Ou
d 01g0)
V
N
L
—N�
%`O W
(,
N
°
'''
N
01 a1 0
IE
W c
a)°
R C N -O N
Z O
°(D
LU V
JIB
V)
N ro r
Vi m
x¢�atil
xa
g
I
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Monticello, Minnesota
Project # UTW-13-003
Project Name Well #6
Description
Construct and drill well #6.
2018 dtru 2022
Department Utility -Water
Contact Pubhe Works Director
T7 pe improvement
Useful Life 40 years
Categon Water System
Priorit) 3 Important (COULD -DO)
Justification
Increase the city's water availability and maintain proper water system capacities
Total Project Cost: $1,200,000
Expenditures 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
Construction/Maintenance 1,200,000 1,200,000
Total 1,200,000 1,200,000
Funding Sources 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
Water Fund 1,200,000 1,200,000
Total 1,200,000 1,200,000
BudgetImpact(Other
Well become part of the city's water system maintenance schedule and there will be increased electncal costs for operating the pumps.
Produced Lung the Plan -h Capital Planwn I. Soho a re
YEAR
GPM
2018
2017
2016
1258
2015
1259
2014
1279
2013
1274
2012
1280
2011
1300
2010
1310
2009
1212
2008
1231
2007
1239
2006
1300
2005
1297
2004
1325
2003
1312
2002
1272
2001
1279
2000
1294
1999
1317
1998
1328
1997
1325
1996
1315
1995
1322
1994
1300
1993
1315
1992
1300
1991
1388
1990 I
1388
IC 1989-)
1200
1988
1200
1987 I
1200
om
1985 I —
1984
1983
1982
HISTORY OF
WELL #1 AND WELL #2
WELL #1
MOTOR HP
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
75
75
M
1
COMMENTS I I GPM
*
E3
*
*#
� II
� II
Mar 1986 - burned
up 60 hp; installed
75 hp
July 1984 - rebuilt
July 1983 - rebuilt
� _II
1350
1368
1388
1369
1398
1400
1300
1345
1300
1288
1300
1308
1315
1300
1317
1311
1301
1325
1329
1324
1063
1065
1075
1050
1050
1035
1035
1160
1160
1160
WELL #2
MOTOR HP
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100-
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
75
75
75
75
75
75
COMMENTS
*
75 I * ' used the 75 hp
from Well #1
60
60
60
60
60 Sept 1985 -rebuilt I
60 I Aug 1984 - rebuilt—1
� � I
KEY:
* = 7 year regular maintenance service
# = Replaced pump in Well #1 after pumping 2,556,476,000 gallons of water
from 1989 to 2010
Q = Year the 800,00 gallon water tower went "on-line" -pressure up by 29 P.S.I
F:\ADMIN\Spread\WATER DEPT\HISTORY OF WELL #1 AND WELL #2-2010 6/16/2017
Table 2. Historic water demand (see definitions in the glossary after Part 4 of this template)
Year
Pop.
Served
Total
Connections
Residential
Water
Delivered
(MG)
CJI/I Water
Delivered
(MG)
Water used
for Non-
essential
Wholesale
Deliveries
(MG)
Total Water
Delivered
(MG)
Total Water
Pumped
MG
( )
Water
Supplier
Services
Percent
Unmetered/
Unaccounted
Average
Dail y
Demand
(MGD)
Max. Daily
Demand
(MGD)
Date of Max. Demand
Residential
Per Capita
Demand
(GPCD)
Total per
capita
Demand
(GPCD)
2005
10,211
3,665
344.197
132.528
54.965
.261
532.951
572.784
I 1.000 I
6.9
1.569
4.889
7/16/2005
92
154
2006
10,662
3,826
419.892
135.294
48.622
.834
604.642
665.925
2.480
8.8
1.569
5.271
7/11/2006
108
171
1.260 I
2007 11,136 3,849 467.673 140.554 47.703 .759 656.689 701.133
6.1
1.921
5.150
7/1/2007
115
172
2008
11,253
3,897
409.880
132.025
52.154
.209
594.268
640.320
1.555
6.7
1.754
4.728
8/10/2008
99
155
2009
11,366
3,969
423.082
146.581
64.992
.238
636.894
659.541
2.001
3.4
1.807 I
4.496
5/28/2009
102
159
I .676 I
2010 12,759 3,969 376.688 137.226 47.227 .675 561.816 593.175
5.2
1.625 I
4.171
5/31/2010
81
127
2011
12,759
3,969
348.580
135.165
44.220
.254
528.219
568.253
1.156 I
6.8
1.557
4.116
6/7/2011
75
122
2012
12,840
3,983
426.358
143.936
47.866
.271
618.431
657.908
6.051
5.0
1.798
4.590
7/1/2012
91
140
6.127 I
2013 12,901 4,045 383.079 134.774 42.207 1.269 561.329 591.889
4.6
1.621
4.269
8/25/2013
81
126
2014
12,993
4,112
328.836
117.679
35.566
3.967
486.048
511.234
6.469
3.6
1.401
4.031
8/3/2014
69
108
2015
13,125
4,148
325.188
115.181
37.006
.437
477.812
513.676
4.797
6.0
1.407
3.203
6/16/2015
68
107
2016
13,311
4,225
329.069
120.203
36.648
.937
486.857
519.364
4.532
5.3
1.423
3.450
06/28/2016
67
106
Avg. 12,896
2010-
2015
MG - Million Gallons
4,037 364.788 130.660 42.348 1.145 538.942 572.689 4.213 5.2 1.568 4.063 77 1 122
MGD- N illion Gallons per bay GPCD-Gallons per Capita >er Day
SENARIO # 1
SENARIO # 2
GALLONS
PUMPED PER
WELL#
MINUTE (GPM)
1
1,300
2
1,300
4
1,800
5
1,750
6,150 GPM
X 1,440 min/day
8.850 million gallons
SENARIO # 2
SENARIO # 3
GALLONS
PUMPED PER
WELL# MINUTE (GPM)
4 1,800
5 1,750
3,550 GPM
X 1,440 min/day
5.112 million gallons
GALLONS
PUMPED PER
WELL#
MINUTE (GPM)
1 or 2
1,300
4
1,800
5
1,750
4,850 GPM
X 1,440 min/day
6.984 million gallons
SENARIO # 3
GALLONS
PUMPED PER
WELL# MINUTE (GPM)
4 1,800
5 1,750
3,550 GPM
X 1,440 min/day
5.112 million gallons
City of Monticello
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
PROJECT NAME: Electrical Improvements to Well House 1 (_132 Broadway El and
Well House 2 (209 Cedar Stj
The City of Monticello is soliciting proposals/quotes for the following:
Xcel Energy currently supplies a service drop to Well House 1 (132 Broadway E), consisting
of 240v Delta 3 phase power. At the point of attachment to Well House 1, there are a set of
current transformers mounted on the mast. On the load side of the current transformers
there are service conductors feeding Well House 1 and an underground lateral feeding Well
House 2, approximately 250' away. Each of the well houses have independent service
equipment and Soft Starter equipment sized to accommodate a 100 HP motor. Due to
higher water demands in the City of Monticello, it is necessary to run both of these motors
simultaneously; something that has been avoided in the past due to service installation. It
has been determined to comfortably run both wells simultaneously, these well houses need
to have separate services.
SCOPE OF WORK:
Remove service lateral from Well House 1 feeding Well House 2 and establish an
independent service at Well House 2. The incoming service shall be overhead; 400a 208v 3
phase fed from a new Xcel Energy pole located approximately 25 feet from the northeast
corner of Well House 2.
Supply and install an outdoor Milbank #U4911 -X -QT -BL 3 phase meter socket on the
exterior east side of Well House 2. Penetrate a precast rooftop overhang, approximately
12" thick and install service mast of rigid steel conduit from the meter socket. Size length
of the mast to accommodate NEC code restrictions on overhead wire clearances above
public sidewalk areas and rooflines.
Supply and install means of attachment to mast for Xcel Energy service conductor drop.
Install guide wire for support of mast if the mast length exceeds a 60 to 40% ratio, 40%
being above roof line.
Supply and install a 400a 3 phase fusible WP manual transfer switch (MTS), Sq.D or
approved equal, or exterior of building, between meter socket and existing service
equipment.
Allow for future wall space to accommodate electrical connection to portable generator
system.
Penetrate through an approximately 10" concrete/brick wall into existing service
equipment. The lower portion of service equipment is 36" side by 24" high, empty area
adequate for this install.
City of Monticello
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
PROJECT NAME: Electrical Improvements to Well House 1 (_132 Broadway El and
Well House 2 f209 Cedar St1
Ground and re -bond MTS as per NEC. Isolate neutrals from grounds within interior service
equipment.
Remove existing lugs from bus bar and discard.
Supply 4 new tandem 250 MCM lugs for reattachment to bus bars after the bus bars have
been thoroughly cleaned.
Wire shall be parallel 3/0 copper THHN conductors for each phase and neutral.
Due to voltage change to Well House 2 from 240v Delta to 208v Y, the Soft Start parameters
will have to be reprogrammed to accommodate the increase on current values and
decrease in voltage values. See Soft Start manual on site.
NOTES:
All Xcel Energy expense for new service hookup will be paid by the City of Monticello.
Inspection and permit fees will be paid by contractor.
Roof repair and patching around the mast is the responsibility of the contractor.
Removal of existing service lateral and mast feeding Well House 2 is the responsibility of
the contractor.
Underground lateral to Well House 2 can be abandoned and left in place but no wire or
conduit is to be visible above ground (remove the old mast from Well House 1 wall).
Well House 1 shall maintain the 240v Delta 3 phase service currently in place.
The contractor shall coordinate the new service install and hookup with Xcel Energy to
minimize the downtime of Well #2 and acquire an accepted downtime schedule from the
City of Monticello representatives.
The Xcel Energy Contact person is Mike Pratt 763-273-7963.
Alternate 1: Eliminate the overhead service drop equipment and add an underground
service lateral approximately 30 feet to the Xcel Energy pole, in conduit, and approximately
30 feet vertically up the pole. Conduits shall be rigid steel at pole side location up the pole
8 feet. Rigid PVC schedule 80 may be used underground and stubbed into the meter.
City of Monticello
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
PROJECT NAME: Electrical Improvements to Well House 1 (132 Broadway El and
Well House 2 (209 Cedar Std.
Please contact the following person or department for more information and specifications
for the RFP:
Name:
Department:
Phone and/or Cell:
Email:
Matt Theisen
Water and Sewer Department
763-271-3274 or 763-370-7442
matt.theisen@ci.monticello.mn.us
To submit an RFP or quote, the submission should be sealed and plainly marked with the
project name on the sealed envelope. Proposals can be dropped off or mailed to the
following address:
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street
Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Proposals are due by: (date/time)
p2©i 7
Base bid amount: Alternate 1 amount:
City of Monticello
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
PROJECT NAME: Electrical Improvements to Well House 1 (_132 Broadway El and
Well House 2 (209 Cedar Stj
NOTES
The City of Monticello reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals, to waive technical
specifications or deficiencies, and to accept any Proposal that it may deem to be in the best
interest of the City.
The Contractor must comply with all local and State laws, rules, and regulations; provide
their state contractor licensing information, and provide proof of other licenses or
certifications that might be required as a condition of the project. Contractor will be
required to meet the insurance specifications as needed for the project and as required by
law. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to supply all necessary tools, supplies
and equipment to perform the work as requested.
The Contractor shall invoice the City within 30 days of the completed project at the rates
agreed to in the contract. The City shall make payment within 35 days of receipt of invoice
unless other terms are written in the contract.
The City of Monticello shall retain the right to terminate the contract with seven (7) days
notice should the Contractor fail to perform work in a professional manner or perform the
work within the demands and time constraints established by the City of Monticello.
Failure to maintain necessary licenses and/or insurance coverage is grounds for
termination of the Contract. The contract could be terminated upon mutual agreement
between the Owner and the Contractor, provided that at least 30 days notice is given by
either party prior to termination.
Contractor will be required to indemnify the City against all suits, claims, judgments,
awards, loss, cost or expense (including attorney's fees without limitation) arising in any
way out of the Contractor's performance or non-performance of its obligations under the
Service Contract. Contractor will defend all such actions with counsel satisfactory to
Owner at its own expense, including attorney's fees, and will satisfy any judgment rendered
against Owner in such action.
20.
City Council Agenda: 6/26/17
Consideration of approving an outside cleaning service to clean citv buildings for
$53,100 annually. (AM)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
We are asking that the City Council approve an outside commercial cleaning service to clean
the following City buildings: Community Center, Library, City Hall, Senior Center, Prairie
Center, and Head End.
The Community Center currently manages several part-time Custodians and full-time
Custodians and Maintenance Technicians to clean and maintain the above listed facilities at
an average annual cost of $281,500. If we were to utilize a commercial cleaning service to
replace our part-time custodians we could see a savings of $49,400 per year. The lowest
bidder, Carefree Cleaning offers a 30 day written notice to cancel at any time.
Our goal with utilizing a cleaning service is to decrease costs while increasing services and
efficiencies.
Quotes have been requested from three commercial cleaning companies and three quotes have
been received. These quotes were received as follows:
Quotes for Commercial Cleaning Services
COMPANY DESCRIPTION TOTAL QUOTE
ServiceMaster Commercial cleaning services $75,756.00 annually
for Community Center,
Library, City Hall, Senior
Center, Prairie Center, and
Head End Building
Mid City Cleaning Commercial cleaning services $219,384.00 annually
for Community Center,
Library, City Hall, Senior
Center, Prairie Center, and
Head End Building
Carefree Cleaning Commercial cleaning services $53,100.00 annually
for Community Center,
Library, City Hall, Senior
Center, Prairie Center, and
Head End Building
Al. Budget Impact: By utilizing the cleaning service the City would save $49,400
annually on its custodial costs.
City Council Agenda: 6/26/17
A2. Staff Workload Impact: We would eliminate our part-time custodial staff, therefore
we would reduce the staff management hours for the Facilities Maintenance
Supervisor to schedule, hire, and supervise part-time staff.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the commercial cleaning service for $53,100.00 annually by the
lowest bidders as highlighted in green as identified in the previous table.
2. Motion to deny the commercial cleaning service.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the approval of the outside commercial cleaning service.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Cleaning Contracts/Estimates
B. Estimated Costs Spreadsheet
2
Carefree Cleaning, LLC PO Box 579 Tel: (763)248-8414
Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 www.carefreecleaning.co
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street, Suite 4
Monticello, MN. 55362
Att. Jerry Hanson
Commercial Cleaning Services Proposal
5/27/2017
Head End - Job Saecifications
Bathrooms:
Clean / Disinfect mirror, sink, dispensers and walls
Disinfect the entire toilet
Check / Fill dispensers
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Sweep and mop the floors (including behind the toilet)
Break Room:
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Sweep and mop floor
Wipe sink and counter
Wipe spills / stains from walls
Main Area:
Vacuumlehll rugs
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Sweep and mop hallways and offices
As Needed:
Wipe chair bottoms
Detail floor corners and crevices using a crevice tool
Detail (scour) sinks and toilets eliminating hard water rings and stains
Carefree Cleaning, LLC PO Box 579
Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330
City of Monticello
Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal
Tel: (763)248-8414
www.carefreecleaning.co
Prairie West - Job Saecifications
Commons and FiberNet
Wipe entry glass and entryway doors
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Dust all flat surfaces
Sweep and mop tile entry
Vacuum all carpeted areas (including hallways, stairs, elevator and entry rugs)
Clean drinking fountains (if applicable)
Wipe the inner elevator walls with stainless steel polish
Bathrooms Wostairs and downstairs)
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Check /fill dispensers
Clean mirrors, sinks, counter, walls and dispensers
Disinfect entire toilet
Sweep and mop floors
As needed
Squeegee entryway glass
Detail (scour) sinks and toilets eliminating hard water rings and stains
Detail carpeted and hard floor surface corners and crevices using a crevice tool
Wipe chair bottoms
Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579
Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330
City of Monticello
Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal
Bathrooms:
Tel: (763)248-8414
www.carefreecleaning.co
Senior Center - Job Saecifications
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Check / fill dispensers
Clean mirror, sink, walls and dispensers
Disinfect entire toilet
Sweep and mop floors
Pottery Room:
Empty trash, replace solid liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Sweep and mop floors
Main Area:
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Dust all flat surfaces
Vacuum all carpeted floors including Pam's office and reception area
Mop tile floor (aware to mop under the garbage by the coffee)
As needed:
Detail (scour) sinks and toilets eliminating hard water rings and stains
Detail carpeted and hard floor surface corners and crevices using a crevice tool
Wipe chair bottoms
Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579
Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330
City of Monticello
Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal
Main Area:
Tel: (763)248-8414
www.carefreecleaning.co
Citv Hall - Job Specifications
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Empty recyclables
Dust all flat surfaces
Clean entry windows / doors
Vacuum all carpeted areas
Break Room:
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Wipe down counter
Wipe down table
Wipe the face of the cabinets
Vacuum all carpeted area
Detail carpeted corners and crevices along the baseboard using a crevice tool
Wipe spills and stains on walls
Wipe chair bottoms
TBD:
Squeegee exterior windows
Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579
Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330
City of Monticello
Commercial Cleaning Service
Gym:
Tel: (763)248-8414
www.carefreecleaning.co
Gvm - Job Soecifications
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Dust all flat surfaces
Clean door frames and spot clean walls
Clean and polish drinking fountains
Sweep and mop the gym floor using the floor machine
As Needed:
Detail the floor edges using a backpack vacuum and a crevice attachment
Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579
Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330
City of Monticello
Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal
Main Area:
Tel: (763)248-8414
www.carefreecleaning.co
Library - Job Specifications
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Dust all flat surfaces
Vacuum all carpeted areas
Sweep and mop all hard floor surfaces
Break Room:
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets
Clean sink and counter
Sweep and mop floors
Sweep and mop halls
Bathrooms:
Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste basket
Empty sanitary napkin receptacle
Empty diaper receptacle
Check / fill dispensers
Clean mirror, sink and walls
Clean toilets and urinals
Sweep and mop floors
As Needed:
Detail floors corners and crevices using a backpack vacuum and a crevice tool
Wipe chair bottoms
Squeegee glass entry
Detail (scour) sinks and toilets eliminating hard water rings and stains
Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579
Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330
City of Monticello
Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal
Tel: (763)248-8414
www.carefreecleaning.co
Communitv Center - Jobs Specifications
Entrvways:
Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets
Clean glass doors
Sweep and mop hard surface floors
Vacuum rugs
Partv Room:
Wipe / dust any surfaces needed
Sweep and mop the floor
Front desk:
Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets
Sweep and mop hard surface floor
Romn and Stoma. FYK and The Warehouse:
Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets
Dust all flat surfaces
Sweep, mop or vacuum all floor surfaces
Spot clean glass
Main Lobbv Restrooms:
Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets
Clean mirrors, sinks, counters, dispensers and walls
Check / fill dispensers
Sanitize the toilets
Carefree Cleaning, LLC PO Box 579
Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330
City of Monticello
Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal
Tel: (763)248-8414
www.carefreecleaning.co
Communitv Center - Job Specifications Continued
Boom Island. Bridae Room and Mississinni Room:
Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets
Dust all flat surfaces
Sweep and mop or vacuum all floor surfaces
Spot clean glass
Hidden kitchen and back hallways:
Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets
Sweep and mop hard surface areas
Dust all flat surfaces
Main Lobbv:
Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets
Dust all flat surfaces
Sweep and mop hard surface areas
Vacuum rugs
Spot clean glass
Caroeted Hallway and Office:
Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets
Dust all flat surfaces
Spot clean glass
Vacuum all carpeted areas
Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579
Your Satisfaction Is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330
City of Monticello
Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal
Tel: (763)248-8414
www.carefreecleaning.co
Communitv Center - Job Specifications Continued
r-TILI=-- Orra
Detail floor corners and crevices using a backpack vacuum and a crevice tool
Wipe chair bottoms
Detail (scour) sinks and toilets eliminating hard water rings and stains
Carefree Cleaning, LLC PO Box 579 Tel: (763)248-8414
Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 www.carefreecleaning.co
Service Aareement
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street, Suite 4
Monticello, MN 55362
Scone of Service
A. Carefree Cleaning LLC. will furnish all labor and supervision. City of Monticello will
supply the toilet paper, paper towels, tissue, hand soap and trash liners, cleaning
equipment and cleaning chemicals required.
B. Buildinas Serviced and Freauencv:
1. Head End: Cleaned on Tuesdays and Fridays
2. Prairie West: Cleaned on Tuesdays and Fridays
3. Senior Center: Cleaned on Mondays and Thursdays
4. City Hall: Cleaned on Tuesdays and Fridays
5. Gym: Cleaned on Tuesdays and Fridays (touched up daily)
6. Library: Cleaned on Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, Sat
7. MCC: Cleaned seven days per week
C. All work will be performed after business hours and completed before opening the
following day.
D. All work will be professionally performed with quality workmanship per
specifications.
E. Contractor employees will not be expected to work on Holidays observed by each
individual building
1. Duration
A. This written agreement contains the entire agreement between both parties.
B. This agreement including pricing shall remain in effect for one year from the
starting date and shall be renewable or renegotiated annually.
C. Customer agrees to notify contractor of any complaints and allow time for prompt
correction.
D. Either party may terminate this agreement with a 30 day notice. Should a customer
cancel without a 30 -day notice, Contractor will be entitled to a 30 -day service charge.
2. Leaal Responsibility
A. Contractor agrees to maintain required liability and accidental insurance.
Carefree Cleaning, LLC PO Box 579 Tel: (763)248-8414
Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 www.carefreecleaning.co
B. Contractor agrees to hold harmless customer from claims for injury, death, or
property damage due to negligence or accident on part of the contractor, its employees
or agents.
C. Contractor agrees to employ safe and professionally accepted cleaning procedures.
D. Customer agrees not to hire any worker or person employed by the contractor during
the term of this agreement and for 365 days after the expiration of this agreement.
E. Contractor is an Independent Contractor with control over its procedures, employees
and agents.
3. Charae Per Buildina
Head End
$216.00
per month
Prairie West
$260.00
per month
Senior Center
$294.00
per month
City Hall
$294.00
per month
Gym
$166.00
per month
Library
$1005.00 per month
Community Center $2190.00 per month
A. Customer agrees to pay the contractor: $4.425.00 + sales tax per month
Due on the 15th day of the following month.
Additional Services offered shall be charged with the next billing cycle at a price of
$25.00 an hour.
4. Billing
A. Accounts shall be considered delinquent after the 1511 of the following month. A
late charge of $30, collection fees (payable by customer) or cancellation of service may
result if delinquency persists.
B. If customer requests a change in frequency or coverage of service, a new price
may be negotiated.
C. If unforeseen events occur beyond the contractor's control (construction obstacles,
natural calamities, major tax increase or national economic crisis) a new price may be
negotiated.
Customer Representative:
Contractor:
Date:
Note: Verbal authorization by customer to commence work including issue of building keys implies agreement with the above terms
including payment of proposed prices. This proposal is valid for 60 days.
S'MiCLMASTER
Clean,
June 2, 2017
City of Monticello
Jerry Hanson
505 Walnut Street
Monticello, Mn. 55362
Dear Mr. Hanson:
SW9° MMASTER SIZAA
Restore e.;r
Thank you for this opportunity to submit a janitorial cleaning proposal for your Monticello facilities (6) in
Monticello, Minnesota.
ServiceMaster would provide the following quotes per building/per department for your review:
• Senior Center cleaned 2 x per week.
• City Hall cleaned 2 x per week.
• Head End cleaned 2 x per week.
• Prairie West Building 2 x per week.
• Library building 6 x per week
• Community Center common areas
& gym 2 x per week 7 x per week
Monthly cost is $290.00 plus tax
Monthly cost is $580.00 plus tax
Monthly cost is $490.00 plus tax
Monthly cost is $433.00 plus tax
Monthly cost is $1430.00 plus tax
Monthly cost is $3090.00 plus tax
ServiceMaster would provide cleaning for all 6 sites...
We would not be interested in splitting them up and providing only five or less facilities. The
pricing would change (increase significantly per building) and would not be ideal for
ServiceMaster to provide service profitably. ( Let me know if we are within your budget to
continue the dialog for SM to provide service.)
Expendable Items such as hand soap, toilet paper, paper towels garbage liners would be
provided by City of Monticello. The Auto scrubber would also be provided by City of
Monticello.
ServiceMaster would provide back ground checks and training and supervision for ServiceMaster
employee at each building.
We at ServiceMaster look forward to partnering with you to provide a professional cleaning for your
facilities in the Monticello area.
ServiceMaster Professional Services Toll Free: 800-245-4622
13355 SO'h Av. N. Ste, 102 Fax: 763-444-1479
Plymouth, MN 55441 www.svmps.com
Servicrosm Servicrosm
Clean Restore 5CnYMNAMR
Sincerely,
Bradley P. Hegman
Regional Commercial Account Manager
ServiceMaster Professional Services Toll Free: 800-245-4622
13355 10th Av. N. Ste, 102 Fax: 763-444-1479
Plymouth, MN 55441 www.svmps.com
Ann Mosack
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
More info from Mid City
Jerry Hanson
Tuesday, June 20, 2017 8:14 AM
Ann Mosack
FW: Propsal
From: Chad Weiers [mailto:chad@midcitycleaning.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 7:22 AM
To: Jerry Hanson<jerry.hanson@ci.monticello.mn.us>
Subject: Re: Propsal
Based on or walk through I feel you need three full time employees and three part time employees.
Sorry I'm downtown working on this sick time ordinance requirements for all downtown employers. I'll send the
proposal when I get back to the office.
Thankyou
Chad Weiers
Mid City Cleaning
Chad(ca midcitvcleanina.com
On Jun 20, 2017, at 7:05 AM, Jerry Hanson <ierry.hanson(caci.monticello.mn.us> wrote:
Hi, Chad
So how many full time and part time employees are we talking about? Can you email me the proposal?
Thanks
From: Chad Weiers fmailto:chad(o)midcitvcleanine.com] H 9 (e. 00 X 3 — 1Zf5$0O
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:57 AM t DO X ' /,
To: Jerry Hanson <ierry.hanson(a)ci.monticello.mn.us> b�� 3 S W��• 00
Subject: Re: Propsal
Hi Jerry t 1$J2—C4-2. Pm
For every full time emplyee your monthly cost would be $4196.00 per a month plus sales tax . For every I rte+ ' "
part time employee working four hours your cost would be $ 1898.00 per a month plus sales tax. I'm
sorry I was not able to drop off the proposal in person. We can mail it if you want.
Thank you
Chad Weiers
Mid City Cleaning
8000 University Ave NE
1
Maintenance and Custodial Staffing Costs
Part-time Custodians/Maintenance
Full-time Custodian (Grade 4)
Full-time Maintenance Tech (Grade 9 -Step 8/Step 1)
Full-time Maintenance Tech (Grade 9 -Step 3)
Contract Cleaning Service
Totals
Note: Added 15K insurance and 15.15% for FICA/Medicare/PERA
Current Costs (6/2017)
$ 79, 500.00
$ 56,000.00
$ 78,000.00
$ 68,000.00
$ 281,500.00
Proposed Costs
$
47,000.00
$
64,000.00
$
68,000.00
$
53,100.00
$
232,100.00
2P.
City Council Agenda: 06/26/2017
Consideration of approving the replacement of Community Center aquatic play
structure by Recreation by Lemmie Jones for $99,765. (AM)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City Council is asked to consider replacing the original aquatic play structure at the
Community Center. A picture of the existing play structure is attached for the Council's
reference. The play structure was painted last September as part of the pool maintenance
shut down, but we are still having issues with the internal structure of the unit. The total
expense of painting the structure was $2,350, which esthetically made the structure look
great in the interim of the replacement, but issues with the play structure still remain.
The base of the play structure is also very slippery and we have had several minor
injuries from patron slips and falls on the structure. It also makes sense to replace the
play structure at the same time as the pool re -plaster project, since removal of the
structure will leave a foot print of the old plaster surface that will have to be repaired.
Quotes have been requested from three contractors and three have been received for the
play structure project. The goal is to have the entire project finished in September of the
current year. These quotes were received as follows:
Quotes for Aquatic Play Structure Replacement
CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION
Aquatix
Rain Drop Products (play
structure only) and Badger
Swimpools (removal and
install only)
Recreation by Lemmie
Jones
Removal of current structure
and Installation of new
aquatic play structure.
Removal of current structure
and Installation of new
aquatic play structure
Removal of current structure
and Installation of new
aquatic play structure
TOTAL QUOTE
$115,081.50 total package
of play structure, removal
and install
$87,814.50 for play
structure and $126,745 for
removal and install for a
total of $214,559.50
$99,765.00 total package
of play structure, removal
and install
Al. Budget Impact: Amounts expended above the budget are financed through the
MCC operations and maintenance fund balance (prior years accumulation of
revenues in excess of expenditures). The current balance is over $700 K. This
expenditure will help draw down this balance for a needed item. Please note that
there are other maintenance items that will be needed in the next few years as
noted on the attached summary which will further draw down this balance.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include coordinating the temporary pool
closure for the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project.
City Council Agenda: 06/26/2017
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the replacement of Community Center's aquatic play structure
for $99,765.00 by the lowest bidders as highlighted in green as identified in the
previous tables.
2. Motion to deny.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1. City Administrator and Community Center Director recommend Alternative 1 as the
timing of play structure installation is done most efficiently if completed in
conjunction with the pool resurfacing.
2. Finance Director recommends Alternative 2 based on other needs of the facility.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Picture
B. Quotes
C. List of possible future capital improvement projects
2
PROJECT QUOTE:
Monticello, MN
June 5th, 2017 (Quote Valid for 45 Days.)
SPRAY • EQUIPMENT
J y� n 1TI11Coynik a."a ' „ K
A ' ;, Q
Fun Deck Play Stricture: (1) 6' square Deck, 4' tall
B .�„t.2ti;°��.�
Hand jets
c `°' "s�
Radial Fan Jets
D.iti-1
Foamy jets (Deck)
,54ar
Radial Down jets
F y"e2 ie
Foot jets
G ,'Z=`; ?
Deck Pop jets
Lt
Radial Arching jets
x 1v
,54ar
Double Racer Slide
Slide Pad
K :1 ADA Accessible Stairs (Curved Landing)
L 1 Cascading Water Table (2 -Way)
M 1 Water Dome
C
11 (Option #1) $99,765.00
Included
1 Stainless -Steel Manifold and Plumbing Package
1 Mounting & Assembly Hardware
1 Wrapping I Packing / Crating
1 Shipping (LTL - In Crates) to Job Site (F.O.B. Monticello, MN)
1 Installation n
1 � MEP (Mechanical, Electrical or Plumbing) &Stamped Engineering Drawings _ �
}�y,,,.,K,fT is''w'i1e:W��Y.-vr;:..?rST.`-;ry-,S"irt'x"C.';:,W'S'?a4'?''cU' :sr^Y•�r�- _ _-_
�x(la":�;i,%.W.:c.:«%%.
Included fScooe of Workl: Equipment Package as listed above, SS Manifold, Mounting & Assembly Hardware, Tear -Out of
Existing Structure, Installation of New Structure, Stamped Submittal Drawings, Two Site Visits, Packaging & Crating, Freight to the
Job Site, Un -Loading at the Job -Site Upon Delivery, O&M Manual & Manufacturer's Limited Liability Warranty.
Not Included: M.E.P. - Mechanical, Electrical or Plumbing, Sales Tax, Union Fees, Prevailing Wage, Stub -Up Piping, Pump, In -
Ground Plumbing Equipment or Labor, Electrical Equipment or Labor, Bid Bond, Performance Bond, Required Permits or
Inspection Fees.
Payment Terms: 50% Deposit Payment due upon Execution of Proposal, 40% Pre -Ship Payment due prior to shipping, & 10%
After Commissioning sign -off by owner (Or 30 days after delivery if installation is delayed due to no fault of Recreation by Lemmie
Jones, LLC, whichever is shorter). Payment Due Upon Receipt of Invoice. No warranties are valid until final payment is received.
All payment terms are subject to credit approval from Recreation by Lemmie Jones, LLC. Lead -Time is 12-16 weeks and is based
on receipt date of Deposit Payment I Color Selections I Signed Agreement I Work Load at the time order is finalized.
Notes: Adequate site access to be provided to accommodate a Loader with Extendable Forks, Facility Shutdown required during
Installation Process. It is agreed that Recreation by Lemmie Jones, LLC I Des1gn2Play, LLC shall be permitted to process our
work without interruption or delay. The Owner hereby agrees that Recreation by Lemmie Jones, LLC will be reimbursed In full for
all costs associated with any delays. These reimbursable costs include, but are not limited to, re -mobilization costs and equipment
rental / deliveryfees. This agreement must become part of the final contractual agreement.
w signing below yon agree to the terms and conditions of this agreement
(Owner( Signature & Printed Name
Date (Recreation by LI Signature & Printed Name Date
Remit To: Recreation by Lemmie Jones, LLC 2112 Carrie Street Carthage, MO 64836
TE+1.417.793.1613 E-mail: lemmie@recreationbylemmiejones.com��`
B■
www.recreationbvlemmleiones.com
BY LEMMIE JONES LLC
a
�Y�
.L
Z
wi
C6
ro
J � g
eJ m 3
L1G u
Lu
1 1
ice.--•��\ i / g
� a
o i ig t w
, a
v O
Cqq
L
i v
� o
m
1 � w
� z
t
0
1 \ n
t y m
t , o
� a
m
� H v
a
y
W .Ai F" ''`i�I�'1■44�e NaY�ed97: �NaauNN
o
pe 0 -NL1_ 0
MU —00
W O a0¢0QryyFp
e�OU ad .
W G wigogcnamauu3
m
n-
A
aquatix
by landscape structures
Dated: 6/20/2017 Project Name: Monticello Community Cntr.
Prepared For: Ann Mosack Aquatix Proposal Number: 17249A-2
Community Center Director
Phone: 763.271.3268
Dear Ann:
Aquatix by Landscape Structure is pleased to provide a quote of products for the referenced project.
This proposal is based on the information provided in the bid request. Detailed product specifications are
attached.
It is our understanding that Aquatix by Landscape Structures is to provide the following water play features for the above
referenced project.
Water Play Features
QtV Description Unit Sales Price Final Sales Price
1 HydraHub1 $112,000.00 $112,000.00
2 4'x 6' Landing Pads $3,185.00 $6,370.00
Water play feature design notes:
• All above water play features are to be the standard product of Aquatix by Landscape Structures.
A Pricing Summary I
Total Price for Equipment as described above: $118,370.00
Total Marketing Package Discount: ($17,755.50)
Discount is valid if order is installed prior to Oct, 2017.
Owner consents to allowing Aquatix to take marketing photo/video.
Removal & Disposal of Existing SCS Strucure $7,855.00
Removal and disposal of existing SCS strucure. "Required plaster finish repair not
included.
Delivery and Installation of Structure: $6,612.00
Installation is for the new structure only and does not include removal or disposal of
existing structure. Does not include pool floor refinish or repair if needed. Access to be
provided for product and materials. No other work is included.
Final Contract Amount: $115,081.50
*Quote is for product supply only.
'Aquatix by Landscape Structures offers operating system components at additional costs.
I General Conditions
*Terms of payment are 25% down with order and balance due prior to shipment.
*Proposal is subject to the attached terms and conditions.
*Proposal and pricing valid for 30 days.
*This proposal and pricing is based on our interpretation of the sections of the RFP or specification that
have been made available to us. Exceptions have been noted where ever possible. In the event of a
conflict between the language in the specification and the proposal, the language in the proposal takes
precedence and is the basis of the proposed pricing. Aquatix by Landscape Structures reserves the right
to reject any order based on differences in pricing. Aquatix by Landscape Structures reserves the right to
reject any order based on differences in interpretation of the specification, or for any reason, at the time
an order is tendered.
*Aquatix by Landscape Structures will not initiate work with out a fully executed contract or purchase
order. Fabrication will not be initiated until complete submittal approvals have been received.
*Submittals will be provided within two -three weeks of receipt of a fully executed contract or purchase
*The proposed equipment can generally be shipped within 6-8 weeks after receipt of completely
approved submittals. Lead time will be updated at the time of order execution.
*Sales tax is not included in the prices quoted. All applicable Federal, State and Local sales or use
taxes must be paid by the customer.
*Freight is FOB Eden Prairie, MN.
If you have any questions or comments concerning this information, please feel free to call me at 952-
345-6440. Thank you for the opportunity to bid on this project.
Sincerely,
Amy Altman
Sales Manager
Acceptance of Proposal
PO Number:
Client Name:
Company:
Bill To Address:
Ship To Name/Address:
"Purchase orders shall be addressed to Landscape Structures
Phone Number:
Install Name/Address (If Different From Ship to Address):
Proposal Amount $
Sales Tax Amount $
Final Contract Amount $
(when applicable)
** Sales tax will be added to your invoice if no tax exempt or resale certificate is received
Client Authorized Signature
Print
Date
The signing of this proposal hereby authorizes the client's acceptance of the above work as described. The client has read,
understands and agrees with the terms and conditions of this proposal.
601 7th Street South
Delano, MN
555328
9
landscape
structures,
�J.iY�ydE i41 liln '.I li..anlili it .d
la. euea'i._le
gni I u.
ii,il iu,u•.0
i
i
ii,
W
D t'
iowN A_w0
NNr
—i
v
o
o
H
S
mRd N
—�
aN
3 mV�0OF
oN o@
C=D
--i3
rC�
x xp j
ou�'im
r
�o
-0
O
C/J
i
Badger
Swimpools
CONSTRUCTING INNOVATIVE AQUATIC FACILITIES
June 20, 2017
City of Monticello
Ms. Ann Mosack
505 Walnut Street #4
Monticello MN
Re: Proposal to install a Rain -drop Typhoon structure at the Monticello Community Center, Monticello, MN.
Dear Ann:
We are pleased to provide a proposal for installing a Typhoon play feature in the activity pool of the Monticello
Community Center, Monticello, MN. We do not include the cost for engineering work and/or for any state/local
approvals for work. All work will be completed according to Minnesota building and swimming pool codes.
We propose to furnish all materials, labor and equipment necessary to complete the following work:
• Remove the existing SCS feature
• Saw cut and remove a portion of the pool floor
• Reroute piping as required
• Repour the pool floor
• Plaster the new concrete
• Install the Typhoon play feature
Total: $126,745
This proposal does not include
• Plan Generation or State submittal
• Pool mechanical work (including: pump replacement)
• Electrical bonding
• Draining, filling or balancing the pool
All standard general requirements and administration is included in the costs above. This proposal is valid for 30
days from the above date. Please call our office at (608) 643-6440 with any questions or if you wish to proceed.
We look forward to working with you and thank you very much.
Sincerely yours,
BADGER SWIMPOOLS, INC.
Robert E. Jelinek, P.E.
bielinek Owbad2crswimpools.com
Badger Swimpools, Inc.* N789 Golf Road, Prairie do Sac, WI 53578 *Pit: 608-643-6440; Fx: 608-643-3732
••r`�Pl'OdUdS,LLC
Date:
To:
Purchaser:
Billing Address:
6/19/2017
Ann Mosack
City of Monticello
Community Center
505 Walnut Street #4
Monticello, MN 55362
PROPOSAL
Reference:
Project Name:
Salesperson:
1563311
City of Monticello WaterPlay S
EHER
First Shipment Address:
Quantity Item # Item Description
1.00 /TYPHOON7-107 TYPHOON STRUCTURE
1.00 SITE SERVICE -STANDARD -001 SITE SERVICE -STANDARD VISIT
INSTALLATION SUPERVISION SUPPORT
Unit Price
$92,655.00
$2,500.00
Extended Amt
$92,655.00
$2,500.00
Total Order $95,155.00
Less discount at a rate of 10.00% -$9,265.50
Freight $1,925.00
N.TPA AWARDED' Taxes - See General Terms, Conditions and Warranty $0.00
4 CONTRACT Net Order $87,814.50
Inquire about our nationwide cooperative purchasing programsl
Payment Terms: Net 30
Estimated Delivery Date upon placement of Order: 12-16 weeks
See the following pages for General Terms, Conditions and Warranty related to this Proposal
2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com
01
��Pr,odLICBILC
PROPOSAL
Reference:
Project Name:
Salesperson:
1563311
City of Monticello WaterPlay S
EHER
GENERAL TERMS, CONDITIONS AND WARRANTY
1) Purchase: By executing this proposal (the "Proposal"), or submitting a purchase order pursuant to this Proposal (which shall
incorporate the terms of this Proposal into such purchase order specifically by reference) which is accepted by Rain Drop
Products, LLC ("Rain Drop") the purchaser identified above ("you" or the "Purchaser") agrees to purchase the products as
detailed in this Proposal (the "Products"), or in the purchase order accepted by Rain Drop, for use by Purchaser or for
installation by Purchaser on behalf of a third -party who will be the ultimate owner of the features and/or equipment (the
ultimate owner of the features and/or equipment, whether Purchaser or a third -party, being the "Owner").
2) Proposal: The above proposal is valid for sixty days from the date first set forth above. After sixty days Rain Drop reserves
the right to increase prices due to the rise in costs of raw material, fuel or other cost increases,
3) Short Shin Claims: Purchaser has fifteen days from receipt of the Products to file a short ship report in writing to its sales
representative. Rain Drop will not honor claims made after this time.
4) Standard Exclusions: Unless specifically included and detailed in this Proposal , this Proposal does not include, and Rain
Drop will not provide services, labor or materials for any of the following work: (a) removal or disposal of any materials
containing asbestos or any hazardous materials as defined by the EPA; (b) moving Owner's property around the installation
site; (c) repair or replacement of any materials supplied by Purchaser or Owner; (d) repair of concealed underground utilities
not located on prints, supplied to Rain Drop by Owner during the bidding process, or physically staked out by Owner, and
which are damaged during construction; or (e) repair of damage to existing surfaces that could occur when construction
equipment and vehicles are being used in the normal course of construction.
5) Bonding Guidelines: If Purchaser uses or provides the Products for an Owner other than Purchaser (including, without
limitation, as a subcontractor of Purchaser), Purchaser will include the following statement in Purchaser's contract with Owner:
"The manufacturer's warranty for the Rain Drop Products brand water components is a separate document between Rain Drop
Products, LLC and the ultimate owner of the Rain Drop brand water components, which will be provided to the ultimate owner
at the time of final shipment for products manufactured by Rain Drop . Due to surety requirements, any performance and/or
payment bond will cover only the first year of Rain Drop Products, LLC warranty."
6) Insurance Reaulrements: Rain Drop will not provide any insurance coverage in excess of its standard insurance, a copy
of which is available for your review priorto acceptance of this Proposal.
7) Payment Terms of payment are defined in the "Payment Terms" section of this Proposal and are specific to this contract..
All payments must be made to Rain Drop Products, LLC, 2121 Cottage Street, Ashland, Ohio 44805. If the Purchaser or
Owner fails or delays in making any scheduled milestone payments, Rain Drop may cease continued manufacturing until such
payments with penalties are made, or Rain Drop may be relieved of its obligations hereunder if payment is more than sixty
days past due. Rain Drop shall be entitled to certain payments previously made as liquidated damages. Rain Drop may use
all remedies available to it under current laws, including but not limited to filing of liens against the property and using a
collection agency or the courts to secure the collection of the outstanding debt. All payments made pursuant to the
installment payment process shall not be available to be recovered by
2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com
8) Taxes: Unless otherwise specifically included and detailed in this Proposal, prices do not include any taxes, including sales,
use or excise taxes. It is the Purchaser's responsibility to furnish evidence of any sales tax exemption in the appropriate
states and have compliance documents, where applicable, on file at Rain Drop.
9) Lien Releases: Upon request by Owner, Rain Drop will issue appropriate partial lien releases as corresponding payments
are received from Purchaser, but prior to receiving final payment from Purchaser or Owner. Rain Drop will provide a full release
of liens upon receipt of final payment. In accordance with state laws, Rain Drop reserves the right to place a lien on the
property if final payment has not been received ten days prior to the filing deadline for liens.
10) Site -Dian Aooroval. Permits. Permit Fees. Plans. Engineering Drawings and Surveving: Site -plan approval, permits, permit
fees, plans, engineering drawings and surveying are specifically excluded from this Proposal unless specifically detailed
herein. Rain Drop does not in any way warrant or represent that a permit or site plan approval for construction will be
obtained.
11) Manufacturing & Deliverv: Manufacturing lead-time from Rain Drop's receipt of this Proposal executed by Purchaser, or
submittal by Purchaser of a purchase order pursuant to this Proposal (which shall incorporate the terms of this Proposal
specifically by reference) which is accepted by Rain Drop is approximately twelve (12) to sixteen (16) weeks depending on the
size and complexity of the components ordered.
12) Changes In the Work: During the course of this project, Purchaser may order changes consisting of additions and
deductions in the work. The cost of these changes will be determined by Rain Drop, and a change order form must be
completed and signed by both Purchaser and Rain Drop , which will detail the scope of the change order. Should any change
order be essential to the completion of the project, and the Purchaser refuses to authorize such change order, then Rain Drop
will be deemed to have performed its part of the project, and the project will be terminated. Upon such termination, Rain Drop
will submit a final billing to Purchaser for payment, less a labor allowance for work not performed but including additional
charges incurred due to the stoppage. No credit will be allowed for materials sold and supplied, which will remain the property
of Purchaser.
13) Restocking Fee There will be a 30% restocking fee applied to all Products returned by Purchaser. Prior approval must be
obtained from Rain Drop before any product is to be returned. All returns are at Rain Drop's discretion.
14) Limited Warrantv
The limited warranties of Rain Drop Products LLC (collectively, the "Limited Warranty") are as follows:
5 Year Product Limited Warrantv. Rain Drop warrants that the Products are warranted for five years from date of shipment
against any defects in material or workmanship under normal use and service. This warranty does not cover normal wear
and tear, improper operation or improper installation of any Rain Drop Product.
25 Year Product Limited Warrantv. In addition, the fiberglass reinforced plastic ("FRP") furnished with any Product has a
twenty-five year warranty from the date of shipment against rust and corrosion only.
2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com
PROPOSAL
P PO d Ll C t S, L L C
Reference: 1563311
Project Name: City of Monticello WaterPlay S
Salesperson: EHER
Purchaser so long as Rain Drop Products is not in default
under the agreement.
8) Taxes: Unless otherwise specifically included and detailed in this Proposal, prices do not include any taxes, including sales,
use or excise taxes. It is the Purchaser's responsibility to furnish evidence of any sales tax exemption in the appropriate
states and have compliance documents, where applicable, on file at Rain Drop.
9) Lien Releases: Upon request by Owner, Rain Drop will issue appropriate partial lien releases as corresponding payments
are received from Purchaser, but prior to receiving final payment from Purchaser or Owner. Rain Drop will provide a full release
of liens upon receipt of final payment. In accordance with state laws, Rain Drop reserves the right to place a lien on the
property if final payment has not been received ten days prior to the filing deadline for liens.
10) Site -Dian Aooroval. Permits. Permit Fees. Plans. Engineering Drawings and Surveving: Site -plan approval, permits, permit
fees, plans, engineering drawings and surveying are specifically excluded from this Proposal unless specifically detailed
herein. Rain Drop does not in any way warrant or represent that a permit or site plan approval for construction will be
obtained.
11) Manufacturing & Deliverv: Manufacturing lead-time from Rain Drop's receipt of this Proposal executed by Purchaser, or
submittal by Purchaser of a purchase order pursuant to this Proposal (which shall incorporate the terms of this Proposal
specifically by reference) which is accepted by Rain Drop is approximately twelve (12) to sixteen (16) weeks depending on the
size and complexity of the components ordered.
12) Changes In the Work: During the course of this project, Purchaser may order changes consisting of additions and
deductions in the work. The cost of these changes will be determined by Rain Drop, and a change order form must be
completed and signed by both Purchaser and Rain Drop , which will detail the scope of the change order. Should any change
order be essential to the completion of the project, and the Purchaser refuses to authorize such change order, then Rain Drop
will be deemed to have performed its part of the project, and the project will be terminated. Upon such termination, Rain Drop
will submit a final billing to Purchaser for payment, less a labor allowance for work not performed but including additional
charges incurred due to the stoppage. No credit will be allowed for materials sold and supplied, which will remain the property
of Purchaser.
13) Restocking Fee There will be a 30% restocking fee applied to all Products returned by Purchaser. Prior approval must be
obtained from Rain Drop before any product is to be returned. All returns are at Rain Drop's discretion.
14) Limited Warrantv
The limited warranties of Rain Drop Products LLC (collectively, the "Limited Warranty") are as follows:
5 Year Product Limited Warrantv. Rain Drop warrants that the Products are warranted for five years from date of shipment
against any defects in material or workmanship under normal use and service. This warranty does not cover normal wear
and tear, improper operation or improper installation of any Rain Drop Product.
25 Year Product Limited Warrantv. In addition, the fiberglass reinforced plastic ("FRP") furnished with any Product has a
twenty-five year warranty from the date of shipment against rust and corrosion only.
2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com
in�Di�op®
� 0* "P1'0dL1CtS,LLC
PROPOSAL
Reference:
Project Name:
Salesperson:
1563311
City of Monticello WaterPlay S
EHER
Original Manufacturer Warrantv. With respect to equipment not manufactured by Rain Drop but used in
conjunction with any Product, any applicable warranty is covered by the original manufacturer of such
equipment and not by Rain Drop. This equipment includes, but is not limited to filtration, chlorination and re-
circulation equipment. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties express or implied. All claims, questions and
inquiries should be directed to the original manufacturer.
Limitations on Warranty
Limited Remedv. The remedy for breach of Rain Drop's Limited Warranty as described above is limited to the replacement or
repair of any Product which is determined to be defective under the reasonable judgment of Rain Drop. Further, the warranty
coverage is only for that Product that has been properly installed and maintained accordingto the instructions provided by
Rain Drop.
Discovery of Defect. In the event of any defective Product covered under this Limited Warranty, written notice of such defect
must be delivered to Rain Drop at the following address:
Rain Drop Products, LLC
2121 Cottage Street
Ashland, Ohio 44805
within the warranty period and within fifteen days after such defect is discovered. Upon confirmation that the defect
exists, Rain Drop will, within a reasonable period of time, replace or repair the defective Product. Rain Drop shall
not be liable for the shipping cost of returning any claimed defective Product to Rain Drop or for shipping costs of replacement
materials. Rain Drop has the ultimate discretion to determine whether a defect exists and whether to replace or repair such
defect.
Disclaimer of Warranties. ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, REPRESENTATIONS, AND WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED,
STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED BY RAIN DROP TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY
APPLICABLE LAW. If the foregoing disclaimer of additional warranties is not given full force and effect, any resulting
additional warranty shall be limited in duration to the express warranties and be otherwise subject to and limited by the terms
of Rain Drop's warranty set forth above.
Limitation of Liability. To the extent permitted by law, Rain Drop shall in no event be liable in connection with its
products for (a) any indirect, special, incidental, liquidated or consequential damages, based on tort, contract or other
2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com
PROPOSAL
- oo, P p 0 d U � t S, L L Reference: 1563311
Project Name: City of Monticello WaterPlay S
Salesperson: EHER
legal theory, whether or not advised of the possibility of such damages, or (b) any damages whatsoever in excess of an
amount equal to the purchase price for such product. The right to recover damages within the limitations specified herein is
the purchaser's exclusive alternative remedy in the event that the remedy provided
herein fails of its essential purpose.
Effective Date and Reservation of Rights. This Limited Warranty is dated as of March 1, 2012 and supersedes and replaces
any previous warranties. Rain Drop reserves the right to revise, amend or modify this Limited Warranty at any time and in any
manner without obligation to notify any individual or entity.
15) Indemnification: To the fullest extent permitted by law, Purchaser shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Rain Drop
and its consultants, agents and employees or any of them from and against claims, damages, losses and expenses, including
but not limited to attorneys' fees, related to the installation of products manufactured and supplied by Rain Drop , provided
that such claim, damage, loss or expense is attributable to bodily injury to, sickness, disease or death of a person or to injury
to or destruction of tangible property, but only to the extent caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the Purchaser or its
agents, employees, or subcontractors or anyone directly or indirectly employed by them or anyone for whose acts they may be
liable, regardless of whether or not such claim, damage, loss or expense is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder.
Such obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that would
otherwise exist as to a party or person described in this Section..
16) Intellectual Pmoertv RI¢hts Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that Rain Drop will remain the owner of any and all
intellectual property rights, including, but not limited to, copyrights, service marks, and trademarks in, on orto the Products.
17) Assemblv/Installation: Rain Drop does not provide installation services. If requested and specifically detailed in this
Proposal, construction site services are intended to imply supervision and consulting services only. All labor required for the
assembly, construction or removal of Products manufactured and supplied by Rain Drop will be the Purchaser's and/or
Owner's responsibility.
18) Site/Use Review by Purchaser: Rain Drop relies on the Purchaser to determine that the Products are appropriate and
safe for the Owner's installation site and/or intended use.
19) Disoute Resolution: Any controversy or claim arising out of or related to this Proposal must be settled by binding
arbitration administered in Ashland, Ohio by a single arbitrator selected by the parties or by the American Arbitration
Association, and conducted in accordance with the construction industry arbitration rules. Judgment upon the award may be
entered in any court havingjurisdiction thereof.
20) Entire Agreement: No Reliance: This Proposal, if accepted by Purchaser, represents and contains the entire agreement
between the parties. Prior discussion or verbal representations by the parties that are not contained in this Proposal are not
part of this Proposal. Purchaser hereby acknowledges that it has not received or relied upon any statements or
representations by Rain Drop or its agents which are not expressly stipulated herein, including. without
2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com
PROPOSAL
in4Di-,oFY
y•'"'�PPOdL1CtS,LLC Reference: 1563311
Project Name: City of Monticello WaterPlay S
Salesperson: EHER
limitation any statements as to the Products, warranties provided hereunder
21) No Third -Party Beneficiaries: This Proposal, if accepted by Purchaser, creates no third party rights or obligations between
Rain Drop and any other person, including any Owner who is not also a purchaser. It is understood and agreed that the parties
do not intend that any third party should be a beneficiary of this Proposal.
22) Governing law: The Proposal will be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio.
Notwithstanding any other law or venue available in any country or jurisdiction, the parties specifically reject all other venues
and jurisdictions other than the United States of America, State of Ohio.
23) Assignment: Purchaser may not assign this Proposal, by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written consent
of Rain Drop. The Proposal, if accepted by Purchaser, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Rain Drop and the
Purchaser, and their successors and permitted assigns.
24) Miscellaneous: Rain Drop objects to the inclusion of any different or additional terms in Purchaser's acceptance of this
Proposal and if such terms are included in Purchaser's acceptance, Purchaser agrees that a contract of sale will nevertheless
result only on the original terms stated in this Proposal. If any portion of this Agreement shall be declared invalid or
unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon
the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, either of which may be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same document. Each
person executing this Agreement for and on behalf of Purchaser represents and warrants that that person has the authority to
execute this Agreement and all corporate action necessary to authorize the execution delivery of this Agreement.
2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com
0
PROPOSAL
PI'OdLICtS,LLC Reference:
Project Name:
Salesperson:
Executed to be effective as of the date executed by the Company:
PURCHASER:
Signature:
By: (Print Name)
Title:
Date:
1563311
City of Monticello WaterPlay S
EHER
2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com
R
J
\
f
\
E-A
§
{
a
/\;
aJ�
,\
KA
R
6` N
M
0
9\
m +
�
B
— —<
G®)
\
r)�
\b
\(\}
C
I)&(
�(
-
() )
P-1—DE:
\) $ !
\
\( \ \
\\ �
....... ..
IN
M <\
/§,.>
�§(( 4
)
!
�~
B
— —<
\
r)�
C
/
P-1—DE:
\
B
R
M-9
U
2
t, I
N
Em
B
§�)
\\
!\$}
-b®}
t=§!
\/
(] )
\\ \
/ _,
\( \ (
§/
«
CD
§i S
-- - - - - - - -
-|
±
!])
{ &
\
2
/§
B
Possible Future Capital Improvement Projects for the Community Center
• Surveillance Cameras and Card Access Reader Installation
• New Recreation/Facility Software
• New Patio in Wheel Park Area
• Waterslide Replacement
• Flooring Replacement
• Mechanical Updates/Recommission
• Front Counter/Concessions Replacement
• Possible Roof Repairs
Please note: The ending 2016 MCC fund balance (reserve) was $761,829
WU
A.
City Council Agenda: 06/26/2017
Consideration of approving the plaster resurfacing of the pool vessel at the
Communitv Center by Northern Pool Resotration at a cost of $79,653.29. (AM)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City Council is asked to consider resurfacing the pool vessel of the Community Center
per the improvement plan provided to the City Council at the MCC budget presentation.
The pool vessel is in need of resurfacing and it is not recommended that we wait another
year to complete this project. Pictures of the existing pool vessel are attached for the
Council's reference. Quotes have been requested from several contractors and three have
been received for the plaster resurfacing project. The goal is to have the entire project
finished in September of the current year. These quotes were received as follows:
Quotes for Pool Vessel Plaster Resurfacing Work
CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION
Northern Pool Restoration
Horizon Commercial Pool
Supply
Global Specialty
Resurface lap pool, activity
pool, and plunge pool. Polish
two, 8 foot diameter spas.
Resurface lap pool, activity
pool, and plunge pool.
Resurface lap pool, activity
pool, and plunge pool.
TOTAL QUOTE
$79,653.29
$80,335.00
$139,780.00
Al. Budget Impact: Amounts expended above the budget are financed through the
fund balance (prior year accumulation of revenues in excess of expenditures).
This project will be funded through the Community Center's fund balance, since
the 2017 budget has been expended for building improvements.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include coordinating the temporary pool
closure for the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the plaster resurfacing of the pool vessel for $79,653.29 by the
lowest bidders as highlighted in green as identified in the previous tables.
2. Motion to deny.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends Alternative 1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Pictures
B. Quotes
ce:
City Council Agenda: 06/26/2017
�llorthern Pool
Restoratlan
Northern Pool Restoration, LLC
1491 92nd Lane NE Blaine, MN 55449
P.763-762-8198
F.763-208-0847
Item/Cost Code
17041 Monticello Community Pool
Description
1 Resurface lap pool, activity pool, and plunge pool
2 Polish two 8 foot diameter spas
Re -surface Indoor Pools as Follows:
Proposal
04/23/17
Job Number: 17041
Project Location
Monticello Community Pool
505 Walnut Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Amount
75,790.90
3,862.39
Grand Total: 79,653.29
1. Remove existing step trim tile, racing lane tile, and transition lines.
2. Chip down several inches below existing waterline tile and around inlets.
3. Clean pool thoroughly to prep for bond coating.
4. Install a bonded plaster base coat and let cure.
5. Install new blue 2" wide (2x2 -bullnose) step trim tile. (Owner to choose from our samples)
6. Install 2" wide white transition lines where needed to allow for multiple days of plastering.
7. Install new blue 12" wide racing lanes, 6" wide belly band, and tile accents (per existing).
8. Install a smooth troweled "Blue" Pearl Bright plaster finish.
Notes
1)Bid is based on pool being sound and not needing additional preparation such as Jack hammering or sandblasting. If
additional preparation is needed there will be extra costs. We will not proceed with work involving extra costs without
written approval from owner. 2) Bid does not include any crack repair. 3) Owner to be responsible for filling the pool
with water, all start-up procedures and balanced water chemistry.
We propose hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with the above
specifications, for the sum of: $79,653.29
Payment to be made as follows: 50% Down; The final 50% drawl to be paid within 30 days of our work completion.
All matedal is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a professional
manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from
above specifications Involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders,
and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements
are contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control.
Authorized
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL -The above prices, specifications and
Conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized
to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Signature Signature
NOTE: This proposal may be
Date of Acceptance: withdrawn by us if not accepted within days.
Report 6-1-11-19 04/23/17
Randy Page 1 of 1 11:22 AM
To: City Of Monticello
Address: 505 Walnut St.
Monticello, MN 55362
Project Name: Monticello Community Center Pool Replaster
Project Location: Monticello Community Center Swimming Pool, Monticello, MN
Line # Item Description
General Conditions
Demolition
New Finishes
Notes:
• Building Permit included
• Price includes removal of delaminated plaster
• New tile Included
• Owner fill and balance pool
• Taxes not included
ACCEPTED:
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory
and hereby accepted.
Buyer:
Signature:
Date of Acceptance:
Contact:
Phone:
Fax:
Bid Number:
Bid Date:
Ann Mosack
763-395-2954
763-295-4404
4/24/2017
Total Bid Price: $139,780.00
CONFIRMED:
Global Specialty Contractors, Inc.
Authorized Signature:
Estimator: Zach Brazier
(651) 406-8232 zbrazler@globalspecialty.net
4/27/2017 11:28:25 AM Page 1 of 1
Quoted to:
Monticello Community Center
505 Walnut St.
Monticello, MN 55362
2125 ENERGY PARK DRIVE, ST. PAUL, MN 55108
W WW.HORIZONPOOLSUPPLY.COM
1-800-969-0454
LOCAL 651-917-3075
FAX 651-917-3087
Customer Proposal / Quotation
Contact 1: Ann Mosack
Contact 2:
Phone: (763)295-2954
Fax: (763)271-7105
Description: MON04
Resurface INDOOR Swimming Pool as follows:
Pool: Aquatic Center Pool
HORIZ N
COMMERCIAL
POOL
SUPPLY
Date: 6115117
Good Through: 7130117
Quote #: 20170615 MON04
Quotedby., Jason Gillet
HYDRA Z0_
- Saw cut and chip under water line tile and all fittings as necessary.
- Chip out any hollow spots in plaster (up to 10 sq. ft.)
- Clean pool to prepare for bond coating.
- Install a bonded base coat.
- Install necessary safety centerline and step border tiles in contrasting color.
- Install a premium, smooth troweled Aquavations Hydrazzo "Grecian White" pool plaster wl blue exposed
aggregate (or equivalent) finish (additional colors available upon request for additional charge).
NOTES: • Please read & initial attached Proposal Notes.
Depth tilesimarkings, drain covers, and other fittings are excluded unless otherwise specified.
Excludes draining and filling of pool unless otherwise specified.
OPTION: • Fill pool with pre-treated, chemically balance water. Highly recommended in areas of hard water.
Add $375 per 5,000 gallons of water and initial here
Pricing:
Quantity Item Number Description
Resurface swimming pool as specified.
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL — I am authorized to sign on behalf of
the owner and I have read the attached Terms & Conditions and
Proposal Notes and the above prices, specifications and conditions are
satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work
as specified. Payment(s) will be made as specified.
Quote Accepted By:
Date:
Authorized Signature:
Unit Price
80,335.00
Total Price
Total: I $80,335.00
$80,335.00 1
1
1
1
1
1
• Products and equipment used to complete job are subject
to applicable stale & city sales taxes.
• Quotes exceeding $2,000 will require a payment of 50%
upon quote acceptance and the remainder is due Net 10
Days.
• Please read all attached Terms & Conditions, Proposal
Notes, and product information. This quote, once signed, is a
contract between Horizon Commercial Pool Supply & the
property owner.
Page 2 of 6
City Council Agenda: 6/26/17
2R. Consideration of approving pavment of sick time balances, estimated at $81,760,
into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan for Union emplovees transitioning to the
city's PTO plan.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City Council is asked to consider approving payment of sick time balances, estimated at
$81,760, into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan for Union employees transitioning to
the city's paid time off (PTO) plan. At the 2017 contract negotiations earlier this year the
Union employees agreed to consider and vote on adopting the PTO program in 2017
separate from the contract negotiations. A vote was held on June 1St and the by a vote of
8-5 the employees voted to accept the PTO program as proposed. The union program is
identical PTO program adopted in 2016 for non-union employees including the 50%
payout of sick time balances into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan.
Al. Budget Impact: The anticipated cost under to transition all Union employees to
the PTO system will be approximately $81,760 based on sick time balances as of
June 9, 2017.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve payment of sick time balances, estimated at $81,760, into the
MN State Healthcare Savings Plan for Union employees transitioning to the city's
PTO plan.
2. Motion to deny payment of sick time balances into the MN State Healthcare
Savings Plan for Union employees transitioning to the city's PTO plan.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Personnel Committee and Staff recommend Alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
• Copy of PTO policy
Paid Time Off (PTO) — Hired after 12/31/1990
Paid time off (PTO) provides all full-time and part-time benefited employees with paid time
away from work that can be used for any purpose. PTO must be scheduled in advance and have
supervisory approval, except in the case of illness or emergency. The PTO policy takes the place
of vacation and sick leave. PTO does not replace pay for City observed holidays, jury duty, or
military leave.
Transition to PTO (hired prior to 12/31/2015)
Vacation balances as of 12/31/15 will be converted to PTO hours on an hour for hour basis on
January 1, 2016.
Example: Vacation balance as 12/31/15 + Annual PTO = PTO balance as of 1/1/2016
Sick balances as of 12/31/15 will be paid out at 50% into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan
(HCSP). Remaining sick time hours after payment will be transferred to an Extended Medical
Bank (EMB).
Extended Medical Benefit (EMB)
Any remaining sick hours after payment into the HCSP will be placed in an EMB which
provides income protection insurance for employees in case of a serious illness. EMB hours may
be used after the first forty (40) consecutive work hours of an absence for a Family Medical
Leave Act (FMLA) qualifying leave. This benefit is meant as insurance. There is no additional
accrual to this bank and it is not paid out upon termination.
Types of PTO Leave
1. Planned PTO is requested and approved prior to the date the employee is taking off.
2. Unplanned PTO is time off reported on the date the employee will not be reporting to
work. When leave is unplanned, the employee must notify their supervisor within one
hour of the employees scheduled work day, or if the employee is already at work, the
employee must notify their supervisor prior to leaving work. Unplanned leave may be
denied if it would result in the department not being able to meet minimum staffing levels
unless the absence is due to illness.
If an employee's use of unplanned leave indicates a pattern suggesting abuse that
interferes with the minimum staffing levels or the ability of the department to conduct
business appropriately, the supervisor shall notify the employee. If such abuse continues
the employee may be subject to denial of unplanned leave or disciplinary action.
Medical Certification
Good attendance is an essential job function for all City employees, if unplanned absences
exceed 3 days, a doctor's certification may be required.
Annual PTO Schedule
Non -Exempt (Hourly):
Less than 6 years
128 hrs/16 days
6 thru 10 years
168 hrs/21 days
11-24 years
224 hrs/28 days
25 years
232 hrs/29 days
26 years
240 hrs/30 days
27 years
248 hrs/31 days
28 years
256 hrs/32 days
29 years
264 hrs/33 days
30 years
272 hrs/34 days
Exempt (Salaried):
Less than 8 years 168 hrs/21 days
8 -24 years 224 hrs/28 days
25 years
232 hrs/29 days
26 years
240 hrs/30 days
27 years
248 hrs/31 days
28 years
256 hrs/32days
29 years
264 hrs/33 days
30 years
272 hrs/34 days
The hours listed above are 50% for part-time benefited employees (30-35 hours per week).
PTO hours will be placed in the employees bank on January 1 st of each year based on time with
the City as of January 1St of each year.
Example: An hourly employee who celebrates their 10 year anniversary on June 6th will receive
168 hours the following January 1St plus an additional 28 hours (56 hrs./12 mo.*6 mo.) of
prorated PTO for a total of 196 hours.
Mid -year hires and terminations will be pro -rated accordingly. The month of hire does not count
towards pro -rated credit in the first year of employment. For mid -year terminations, if an
employee has used more than their pro -rated amount for the year, the overpayment of PTO will
be deducted from their final paycheck.
Probationary Employees
Probationary employees are not able to use more than forty (40) hours of time off during their
first six (6) months of employment.
Annual Usage Requirement
Employees must use at least 50% of their annual accrual each year.
Annual Contribution to the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan (HCSP)
PTO balances over 320 hours as of the first payroll in December will be paid into the HCSP
(maximum of 48 hours) based on the employee's current hourly rate of pay. The HCSP deposit
does not count towards an employee's 50% usage requirement.
Employees who use bereavement leave during the year will not be allowed to roll hours into the
HCSP.
Carry -Over
Employees may carry over up to 320 hours of PTO each year into the next year. Any hours over
320 will be forfeited at year-end, unless due to a qualifying (unusual or non-recurring)
circumstance the City Administrator approves an extension or cash payment to avoid a loss of
PTO time. All qualifying circumstances must be reported to the Personnel Committee on an
annual basis.
Unpaid Leave
Employees must normally use all earned PTO prior to taking an unpaid leave. If the leave
qualifies under the Parenting Leave or Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the employee may
retain a balance of forty (40) hours when going on an unpaid leave. Any exceptions must be
approved by the City Administrator.
PTO Donation
Employees may transfer their PTO hours from one employee to another under the following
conditions:
A. Such transfers can be made only after the showing of unique or special circumstances and
only upon the approval of the City Administrator. Before such transfer will be approved,
the proposed recipient of the transfer must have used all of his/her PTO.
B. PTO transfer shall be limited to forty (40) hours per donor. Such transfer shall be made
on a dollar for dollar basis. The worth of the leave shall be adjusted to the pay level of
the donor. Therefore, if the salary of the donor is greater than the recipient, one day of
leave from the donor shall result in more than one full day to the recipient. Conversely, if
the salary of the donor is less than the recipient, the one -day of leave from the donor shall
result in less than one full day.
C. Requests for such transfer of PTO must be submitted in writing, to the Human Resources
Manager or designee, who shall handle all communications between recipient and donor.
When a donor volunteers such transfer, he/she must first execute a release document for
such transfer that will be kept on file in the Human Resource Department.
D. When a transfer has been finalized in accordance with the rules and approved by the
Human Resources Manager and City Administrator, the Finance Department shall take
the necessary accounting action to reflect such transfer.
Council Agenda: 6/26/17
3A. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-29 Approving Prouerty Tax Abatement
Related to Infrastructure Improvements in the Citv of Monticello (WO)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
On May 22, 2017, the City Council called for a public hearing on June 26, 2017, as
required by the tax abatement process to issue debt for construction of the Fallon Avenue
overpass and related street improvements. The notice of public hearing was published in
the Monticello Times.
The following is from the Mav 22nd staff report:
The city plans to issue abatement bonds to finance construction of the Fallon Avenue
overpass and related street improvements. The city is issuing these bonds under the
abatement statute because no other general obligation bonding mechanism is available for
the project as it is proposed. As part of the process, the city has identified properties that
will benefit from the project for inclusion in the abatement project area. The benefitting
properties will pay property taxes in the same manner as non -benefitting properties. In
that sense, the term abatement is misleading.
On February 13, 2017, the city passed a resolution declaring its intent to seek
reimbursement (up to $8.4 million) for project costs from bond issue proceeds. The
abatement project will be combined with other improvement projects for one bond issue
this Fall. Two separate bond issues will support the project, with the first issue in 2017
having a 15 year term. The second issue will have a 14 year term. No hearing will be
required for additional issuances.
The total combined abatement bonds to be issued over a two-year period will not exceed
$9,000,000, supported by an annual abatement levy collected over a term of 15 years.
Al. Budget Impact: By adopting this resolution the city would have the ability to
include this project in a future bond issue.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal.
A3. Legal Review: The resolution was prepared by legal counsel.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to close the public hearing and approve Resolution 2017-29 — Resolution
Approving Property Tax Abatement Related to Infrastructure Improvements in the
City of Monticello.
2. Motion to close the public hearing and deny approval of Resolution 2017-29.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City Staff recommends Alternative #1.
Council Agenda: 6/26/17
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Resolution 2017-29
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-29
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT
RELATED TO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Monticello, Wright
County, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The City has contemplated granting a property tax abatement in order to help finance
infrastructure improvements primarily consisting of the construction of the Fallon overpass and associated
street improvements (the "Project"), which will benefit certain property in the City, all pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, as amended (the "Act").
1.02. Pursuant to Section 469.1813, subdivision 1 of the Act, the City may grant an abatement of
all or a portion of the taxes imposed by the City on a parcel of property to pay for all or part of the cost of
acquisition or improvement of public infrastructure, whether or not located on or adjacent to the parcel for
which the tax is abated.
1.03. The City has identified nine hundred sixty-eight (968) parcels located in the City,
identified in EXHIBIT A hereto (the "Abatement Property"), which will be benefitted by the Project and
from which the City proposes to abate a portion of the City's share of taxes to help finance the Project,
subject to all the terms and conditions of this resolution.
1.04. The City intends to issue one or more series of general obligation bonds, a portion of which
will be designated as tax abatement bonds in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000 (the
"Abatement Bonds") and will be issued to pay the costs of the Project pursuant to the Act and are expected to
be paid primarily through the collection of Abatement revenues (as defined herein).
1.05. On the date hereof, the Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Abatement at
which the views of all interested persons were heard.
Section 2. Findings.
2.01. It is hereby found and determined that the benefits to the City from the Abatement will be at
least equal to the costs to the City of the Abatement, because (a) the Abatement will help finance the Project,
which is necessary to provide improved transportation and safety and to prevent deterioration of road
infrastructure conditions in the City; and (b) the increased City taxes collected from the Abatement Property
upon termination of the Abatement are expected to far exceed the amount of the Abatement collected from
the Abatement Property during the term of this resolution.
2.02. It is hereby found and determined that the Abatement is in the public interest for the reasons
described in Section 2.01 hereof.
501817v2 MNI MN190-154
Section 3. Actions Ratified. Abatement Approved.
3.01. The Board hereby ratifies all actions of the City's staff and consultants in arranging for
approval of this resolution in accordance with the Act.
3.02. Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Abatement is hereby approved and adopted subject
to the following terms and conditions:
(a) The term "Abatement" means the City's share of the real property taxes generated
from the improvements on the Abatement Property, in the amounts described in this Section:
(i) The aggregate Abatement paid by the City during the term of this resolution
will not exceed the amount necessary to pay the principal of the Abatement Bonds, up to a
maximum of $9,000,000.
(ii) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Abatement payable on
any August 1 and subsequent February 1, combined, will not exceed the amount produced
by extending the City's total tax rate for the applicable year against the tax capacity of the
Abatement Property, as of January 2 in the prior year.
(iii) In accordance with Section 469.1813, subdivision 8 of the Act, in no year
shall the Abatement, together with all other abatements approved by the City under the Act
and paid in that year, exceed the greater of 10% of the City's net tax capacity for that year or
$200,000 (the "Abatement Volume Cap"). The City may grant any other abatements
permitted under the Act after the date of this resolution, provided that to the extent the
total abatements in any year exceed the Abatement Cap, the allocation of Abatement Cap
to such other abatements is subordinate to the Abatements under this Agreement.
(b) The City will pay the Abatement in semiannual installments each February 1 and
August 1, commencing June 1, 2018, and continuing through February 1, 2033. The City will pay
the Abatement solely to finance the cost of the Project, through application of Abatement amounts
toward debt service payments on the Abatement Bonds (including any bonds issued to refund the
initial Abatement Bonds).
(c) This resolution may be modified only with the prior written approval of the City,
and any modification is subject to Section 469.1813, subdivision 7 of the Act.
(d) In accordance with Section 469.1815 of the Act, the City will add to its levy in each
year during the term of the Abatement the total estimated amount of current year Abatement granted
under this resolution.
3.03. The Mayor and City Administrator are authorized and directed to execute and deliver any
agreements, certificates or other documents that the City determines are necessary to implement this
resolution.
501817v2 MM MN190-154 2
Approved by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, this 26`h day of June, 2017.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
501817v2 MNI MN190-154
EXHIBIT A
ABATEMENT PROPERTY
Parcel Identification Numbers:
155221001010, 155212001020, 155229001020, 155178002030, 155207001020, 155209001010, 155211001010,
155212001030, 155220001010, 155207001010, 155212001010, 155216001010, 155219000010, 155221000010,
155229001010, 155208001020, 155208001010, 155069001010, 155069001090, 155069002030, 155069002060,
155069003010, 155069003040, 155073001010, 155073002010, 155073003050, 155073003080, 155073003110,
155073003140, 155073005020, 155073005130, 155073006010, 155073006040, 155078001030, 155078002020,
155078002050, 155078002080, 155078002160, 155078003020, 155078003050, 155078003080, 155078003110,
155078003190, 155078004010, 155078004040, 155082001030, 155082001060, 155082001090, 155082002030,
155082002090, 155082002170, 155082002200, 155082003030, 155082003060, 155082003090, 155082003170,
155082004010, 155082004040, 155082004070, 155082005010, 155088001030, 155088002010, 155088002040,
155088003020, 155088003050, 155088004020, 155088005010, 155088007020, 155090001030, 155090001060,
155090002020, 155090002050, 155090002080, 155090002140, 155090003020, 155090003050, 155090003080,
155090003110, 155090003140, 155090003220, 155090004030, 155090004060, 155090005030, 155093001010,
155093001040, 155093001070, 155093001150, 155093001180, 155096001040, 155096001070, 155096001100,
155096001130, 155096001160, 155096002080, 155096002110, 155096003030, 155096003060, 155096003090,
155102001030, 155102001060, 155102001090, 155102001120, 155102002020, 155102002100, 155102003010,
155102003040, 155102003070, 155102004020, 155103001060, 155103001090, 155103002010, 155103002040,
155103003030, 155103003110, 155103003170, 155105001060, 155105001090, 155105001150, 155105003030,
155105004030, 155105004060, 155105004090, 155105004120, 155105004150, 155105005080, 155105005110,
155105005140, 155105005170, 155105005200, 155105006010, 155105006040, 155105006070, 155105007010,
155105007040, 155105008050, 155105008080, 155110001020, 155110001080, 155110001220, 155110001250,
155110001280, 155110001310, 155118001010, 155118001040, 155118001070, 155118001100, 155118002010,
155118002040, 155124001020, 155124001050, 155124001080, 155124002020, 155124003010, 155124003090,
155124003120, 155124003150, 155124003180, 155129001030, 155129001060, 155130001040, 155130001070,
155130001100, 155130001130, 155130002030, 155130002060, 155133001160, 155133001560, 155133001620,
155147002030, 155147003030, 155147005010, 155154004020, 155154006050, 155155001070, 155155004180,
155172002040, 155172003090, 155175004010, 155175005100, 155177002070, 155180002010, 155180003020,
155180004060, 155133001020, 155133001050, 155133001130, 155133001190, 155133001220, 155133001250,
155133001280, 155133001360, 155133001420, 155133001480, 155133001590, 155147001020, 155147001050,
155147002060, 155147005040, 155147006030, 155147007020, 155147008020, 155154001010, 155154001040,
155154002030, 155154003030, 155154005040, 155154005070, 155154006020, 155154007020, 155155002030,
155155003020, 155155003050, 155155003130, 155155004010, 155155004040, 155155004070, 155155004150,
155170001030, 155170001060, 155170002030, 155172002010, 155172002100, 155172003060, 155172003120,
155175001040, 155175002010, 155175002040, 155175002070, 155175003160, 155175003190, 155175004040,
155175005070, 155175005130, 155180002070, 155180002180, 155180002210, 155069001040, 155069001070,
155069002010, 155069002040, 155069002070, 155069003050, 155069003070, 155073002040, 155073003030,
155073003060, 155073003090, 155073003120, 155073005050, 155073005080, 155073005100, 155073005110,
155073005140, 155073005160, 155073005170, 155073006070, 155078001010, 155078001040, 155078002030,
155078002110, 155078002140, 155078002170, 155078003030, 155078003060, 155078003140, 155078003170,
155078003200, 155078004020, 155078004050, 155078004070, 155082001010, 155082001040, 155082001070,
155082002010, 155082002060, 155082002120, 155082002150, 155082002180, 155082003010, 155082003040,
155082003120, 155082003150, 155082003180, 155082004020, 155082004050, 155082004080, 155088001010,
155088001040, 155088002070, 155088002100, 155088003030, 155088003060, 155088004030, 155088007050,
155090001090, 155090001120, 155090002030, 155090002060, 155090002090, 155090002110, 155090002170,
155090002200, 155090003030, 155090003060, 155090003090, 155090003170, 155090003200, 155090003210,
155090004010, 155090004040, 155090005010, 155090005060, 155090005090, 155093001020, 155093001100,
155093001130, 155093001160, 155093001170, 155096001020, 155096001050, 155096001080, 155096001110,
155096002030, 155096002060, 155096002090, 155096003010, 155096003040, 155096003070, 155102001010,
155102001040, 155102001070, 155102001100, 155102002050, 155102002080, 155102002110, 155102002130,
155102002140, 155102003020, 155103001010, 155103001040, 155103001070, 155103001100, 155103002020,
501817v2 MM MN190-154 A-1
155103003060, 155103003090, 155103003120, 155103003140, 155103003150, 155103003180, 155103003200,
155105001010, 155105001040, 155105001070, 155105001100, 155105001120, 155105001130, 155105002010,
155105002030, 155105003060, 155105004010, 155105004040, 155105004070, 155105004100, 155105005030,
155105005060, 155105005090, 155105005120, 155105005150, 155105005230, 155105005260, 155105006020,
155105006050, 155105006080, 155105007070, 155105008030, 155105008040, 155105008060, 155105008090,
155110001030, 155110001050, 155110001110, 155110001140, 155110001170, 155110001190, 155110001200,
155110001230, 155110001260, 155110001340, 155118001020, 155118001050, 155118001080, 155118001110,
155118002070, 155124001010, 155124001030, 155124001060, 155124003040, 155124003070, 155124003100,
155124003110, 155124003130, 155124003160, 155129001010, 155130001020, 155130001050, 155130001080,
155130001110, 155130002010, 155133001080, 155133001110, 155133001120, 155133001140, 155133001170,
155133001200, 155133001230, 155133001310, 155133001340, 155133001350, 155133001370, 155133001390,
155133001400, 155133001430, 155133001450, 155133001510, 155133001540, 155133001570, 155133001580,
155133001600, 155133001630, 155147001030, 155147002010, 155147002040, 155147003060, 155147004010,
155147004030, 155147005020, 155147006010, 155147006040, 155147007030, 155147007050, 155147009010,
155147009020, 155147009040, 155154001020, 155154002010, 155154004050, 155154005020, 155154005050,
155154005080, 155154006030, 155155001020, 155155001050, 155155002040, 155155003080, 155155003110,
155155003140, 155155003160, 155155003170, 155155004020, 155155004100, 155155004130, 155155004160,
155170001010, 155170001040, 155170002040, 155170002060, 155172002020, 155172002050, 155172002070,
155172003010, 155172003040, 155172003070, 155172003100, 155172003130, 155175001020, 155175001050,
155175002020, 155175002050, 155175003020, 155175003050, 155175003080, 155175003110, 155175003140,
155175003170, 155175003200, 155175005020, 155175005050, 155175005080, 155175005110, 155177002020,
155177002050, 155180001050, 155180002040, 155180002050, 155180002130, 155180002160, 155180002190,
155180002220, 155180004010, 155180004090, 155069001020, 155069001030, 155069001050, 155069001060,
155069001080, 155069002020, 155069002050, 155069002080, 155069003020, 155069003030, 155069003060,
155073001020, 155073001030, 155073002020, 155073002030, 155073003010, 155073003020, 155073003040,
155073003070, 155073003100, 155073003130, 155073004010, 155073005010, 155073005030, 155073005040,
155073005060, 155073005070, 155073005090, 155073005120, 155073005150, 155073005180, 155073006020,
155073006030, 155073006050, 155073006060, 155073006080, 155073006090, 155078001020, 155078002010,
155078002040, 155078002060, 155078002070, 155078002090, 155078002100, 155078002120, 155078002130,
155078002150, 155078003010, 155078003040, 155078003070, 155078003090, 155078003100, 155078003120,
155078003130, 155078003150, 155078003160, 155078003180, 155078003210, 155078004030, 155078004060,
155078004080, 155082001020, 155082001050, 155082001080, 155082002020, 155082002040, 155082002050,
155082002070, 155082002080, 155082002100, 155082002110, 155082002130, 155082002140, 155082002160,
155082002190, 155082003020, 155082003050, 155082003070, 155082003080, 155082003100, 155082003110,
155082003130, 155082003140, 155082003160, 155082003190, 155082004030, 155082004060, 155082004090,
155082005020, 155082005030, 155088001020, 155088001050, 155088002020, 155088002030, 155088002050,
155088002060, 155088002080, 155088002090, 155088003010, 155088003040, 155088004010, 155088004040,
155088006010, 155088007010, 155088007030, 155088007040, 155090001010, 155090001020, 155090001040,
155090001050, 155090001070, 155090001080, 155090001100, 155090001110, 155090002010, 155090002040,
155090002070, 155090002100, 155090002120, 155090002130, 155090002150, 155090002160, 155090002180,
155090002190, 155090003010, 155090003040, 155090003070, 155090003100, 155090003120, 155090003130,
155090003150, 155090003160, 155090003180, 155090003190, 155090004020, 155090004050, 155090005020,
155090005040, 155090005050, 155090005070, 155090005080, 155090005100, 155090006010, 155093001030,
155093001050, 155093001060, 155093001080, 155093001090, 155093001110, 155093001120, 155093001140,
155096001010, 155096001030, 155096001060, 155096001090, 155096001120, 155096001140, 155096001150,
155096002010, 155096002020, 155096002040, 155096002050, 155096002070, 155096002100, 155096003020,
155096003050, 155096003080, 155102001020, 155102001050, 155102001080, 155102001110, 155102001130,
155102002010, 155102002030, 155102002040, 155102002060, 155102002070, 155102002090, 155102002120,
155102002150, 155102003030, 155102003050, 155102003060, 155102003080, 155102004010, 155103001020,
155103001030, 155103001050, 155103001080, 155103001110, 155103002030, 155103003010, 155103003020,
155103003040, 155103003050, 155103003070, 155103003080, 155103003100, 155103003130, 155103003160,
155103003190, 155103003210, 155105001020, 155105001030, 155105001050, 155105001080, 155105001110,
155105001140, 155105002020, 155105003010, 155105003020, 155105003040, 155105003050, 155105003070,
155105003080, 155105004020, 155105004050, 155105004080, 155105004110, 155105004130, 155105004140,
155105005010, 155105005020, 155105005040, 155105005050, 155105005070, 155105005100, 155105005130,
155105005160, 155105005180, 155105005190, 155105005210, 155105005220, 155105005240, 155105005250,
501817v2 MM MN190-154 A-2
155105005270, 155105006030, 155105006060, 155105006090, 155105007020, 155105007030, 155105007050,
155105007060, 155105008010, 155105008020, 155105008070, 155105008100, 155110001010, 155110001040,
155110001060, 155110001070, 155110001090, 155110001100, 155110001120, 155110001130, 155110001150,
155110001160, 155110001180, 155110001210, 155110001240, 155110001270, 155110001290, 155110001300,
155110001320, 155110001330, 155118001030, 155118001060, 155118001090, 155118001120, 155118002020,
155118002030, 155118002050, 155118002060, 155118002080, 155124001040, 155124001070, 155124001090,
155124002010, 155124002030, 155124002040, 155124003020, 155124003030, 155124003050, 155124003060,
155124003080, 155124003140, 155124003170, 155124003190, 155129001020, 155129001040, 155129001050,
155129001070, 155129001080, 155130001010, 155130001030, 155130001060, 155130001090, 155130001120,
155130002020, 155130002040, 155130002050, 155133001010, 155133001030, 155133001040, 155133001060,
155133001070, 155133001090, 155133001100, 155133001150, 155133001180, 155133001210, 155133001240,
155133001260, 155133001270, 155133001290, 155133001300, 155133001320, 155133001330, 155133001380,
155133001410, 155133001440, 155133001460, 155133001470, 155133001490, 155133001500, 155133001520,
155133001530, 155133001550, 155133001610, 155133001640, 155147001010, 155147001040, 155147002020,
155147002050, 155147003010, 155147003020, 155147003040, 155147003050, 155147004020, 155147004040,
155147005030, 155147006020, 155147007010, 155147007040, 155147007060, 155147008010, 155147008030,
155147008040, 155147009030, 155154001030, 155154002020, 155154003010, 155154003020, 155154003040,
155154004010, 155154004030, 155154004040, 155154004060, 155154005010, 155154005030, 155154005060,
155154006010, 155154006040, 155154007010, 155154007030, 155154007040, 155155001010, 155155001060,
155155002020, 155155003010, 155155003030, 155155003040, 155155003060, 155155003070, 155155003090,
155155003100, 155155003120, 155155003150, 155155004030, 155155004050, 155155004060, 155155004080,
155155004090, 155155004110, 155155004120, 155155004140, 155155004170, 155170001020, 155170001050,
155170002010, 155170002020, 155170002050, 155172001010, 155172002030, 155172002060, 155172002080,
155172002090, 155172002110, 155172002120, 155172003020, 155172003030, 155172003050, 155172003080,
155172003110, 155172003140, 155175001010, 155175001030, 155175001060, 155175002030, 155175002060,
155175002080, 155175003010, 155175003030, 155175003040, 155175003060, 155175003070, 155175003090,
155175003100, 155175003120, 155175003150, 155175003180, 155175003210, 155175004020, 155175004030,
155175004050, 155175005010, 155175005030, 155175005040, 155175005060, 155175005090, 155175005120,
155177001010, 155177002010, 155177002030, 155177002040, 155177002060, 155180001010, 155180001030,
155180001060, 155180002030, 155180002060, 155180002080, 155180002110, 155180002120, 155180002140,
155180002150, 155180004040, 155180004070, 155180004080, 155154006060, 155155001040, 155175003130,
155180004030, 155155002010, 155155004190, 155180001020, 155180001040, 155180002020, 155180002100,
155155001030, 155155003180, 155180002090, 155180002170, 155180002200, 155180003010, 155180004020,
155180004050,155241001020
501817v2 MM MN190-154 A-3
Council Agenda: 06/26/16
4A. Consideration of approving acceptance of the 2016 Audit Renort (WO)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
A transparent organization trusted with properly managing public dollars, the city of
Monticello and all Minnesota cities are statutorily required to have a private third parry
conduct an annual audit of its financial statements. For the seventh year, Malloy, Montague,
Kamowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. (MMKR) conducted the city's audit.
All Finance Department personnel contributed to audit process, with the finance manager
providing a substantial and critical role.
The city's 2015 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) received the Government
Finance Officers Association's (GFOA) Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
Financial Reporting. This is the sixth time the city has received the award, but the second
time staff prepared the report. The 2016 CAFR was prepared and submitted by staff to the
GFOA for grading and comment. Finally, the CAFR format allows credit rating firms to
compare the city's financial position with other cities. Such comparison could lead to a better
bond rating.
Jim Eichten, Principal of MMKR, will present a summary of their findings and summarize
the highlights of the City's 2016 CAFR. Information presented at the workshop and council
meeting will be available on-line at the city_ 's website under city_ services — finance. No extra
copies will be available for distribution.
Al. Budget Impact: Acceptance of the audit report results in no costs.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: Prepare agenda item and post to website.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to accept the 2016 Audit Report.
2. Motion to not accept the 2016 Audit Report at this time.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff supports Alternative #1. The finance director would like to thank all city and
departmental staff for their participation in the audit process, adherence to
procedures/policies/statutes, and contribution to the final product.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. The 2016 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (Available online — printed copy
provided at the City Council meeting)
B. Special Purpose Audit Report
C. Management Letter
'.S' �� *till+ ,� lyT�? � �i� •��• l .�, y. ` �.� •+ � • �"
CITY fifiONTIC" �NN S
Comprehesive An nuaL.Firlancial Repo r - _
... o4j ...
FOR THE FISC SEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 201 --
* y
OAK
.+t •' ��5. t w, ,� �, ice• ; ti -�, - f � w �t `� �.+i
• _ yam' �� ^• 4'l�"_- ter./'• y •l• t
ar
or
10
411
IwIt
46
yf '• • - � _"._• .fir A 4�=� �i'� �i `� � r. � -���� /f'' _ l� T � `. .
{t-IPfw +
10
f• � `- � .:l� 'fit ra ,� �— ��
City of Monticello
Wright County, Minnesota
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016
Prepared by
THE "FINANCE TEAM"
Julie Cheney, Finance Assistant Debbie Davidson, Finance Clerk Sarah Rathlisberger, Finance Manager
RaeLynn Cook, Payroll -Finance Clerk Pat Kovich, Utility Billing Specialist Wayne W. Oberg, Finance Director
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
Table of Contents
December 31, 2016
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
Letter of Transmittal
GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
Organization Chart
Directory of Officials
FINANCIAL SECTION
Independent Auditor's Report
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Basic Financial Statements
Government -wide Financial Statements
Statement of Net Position
Statement of Activities
Fund Financial Statements
Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds
Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Governmental Funds
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to
the Statement of Activities
Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position - Proprietary Funds
Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds
Notes to the Financial Statements
Required Supplementary Information
Schedules of Employer's Share and Non -Employer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
Schedules of Employer's Pension Contibutions
Schedule of Changes in the Fire Relief Association's Net Pension Liability (Asset) and Related Ratios
Schedule of Funding Progress
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - General Fund
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Community Center Fund
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Economic Development Authority Fund
Notes to the Required Supplementry Information
Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
(continued)
Paqe
1
4
5
6
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
29
30
32
57
58
59
60
62
64
65
66
67
68
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
Table of Contents
December 31, 2016 (continued)
Internal Service Funds
Paqe
Combining Statement of Net Position
69
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position
70
Combining Statement of Cash Flows
71
Other Supplementry Schedules
Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses) - General Fund
73
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Minnesota Investment Fund
77
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Cemetery Fund
78
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - CDBG-Revitalization Fund
79
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances - Economic Development Authority
80
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) - Economic Development Authority
82
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balances - Debt Service Activities
84
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) - Debt Service Activities
85
STATISTICAL SECTION
Financial trends
Net Position by Component - Last Ten Fiscal Years
87
Changes in Net Position - Last Ten Fiscal years
88
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years
90
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years
91
Governmental Funds Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting)
92
General Governmental Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting)
93
Revenue capacity
Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property - Last Ten Fiscal Years
94
Property Tax Rates - All Direct and Overlapping Governments - Last Ten Fiscal Years
95
Property Tax Levies and Collections - Last Ten Fiscal Years
96
Principal Property Taxpayers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago
97
Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons) - Last Ten Fiscal Years
98
Water and Sewage Utility Rates - Last Ten Fiscal Years
99
Debt capacity
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type - Last Ten Fiscal Years
100
Ratios of Net General Obligation Bonded Debt Outstanding - Last Ten Fiscal Years
101
Legal Debt Margin Information - Last Ten Fiscal Years
102
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt
103
Schedule of General Obligation Revenue Bond Coverage - Last Four Fiscal Years
104
Economic and demographic information
Demographic and Economic Statistics - Last Ten Fiscal Years
105
Principal Employers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago
106
Operating information
City Government Employees by Function/Program - Last Ten Fiscal Years
107
Operating Indicators by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years
108
Capital Assets Statistics by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years
110
II
- _ -_�-_ s= �_- `- - �TRODU�T - � T 1�i1 - - = - s,
Letter of Transmittal
CIOr
IZMontiiceflo
4awmm
Finance Department
June 20, 2017
To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, and the Citizens of the
City of Monticello:
I am pleased to present the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the city) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data and the
completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests
with the city. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is
accurate, in all material respects, and is reported in a manner designed to
present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the various
funds of the city. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an
understanding of the city's financial activities have been included.
Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability
of the information contained in this report, based upon a comprehensive
framework of internal control that it has established for this purpose. Because
the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated benefits, the
objective is to provide reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance that the
financial statements are free of any material misstatements.
The city's financial statements have been audited by Malloy, Montague,
Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. (MMKR), a firm of licensed certified public
accountants. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable
assurance that the financial statements of the city for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016 are free of material misstatements. The independent audit
involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. The independent auditor concluded,
based upon the audit, that there was a reasonable basis for rendering an
CITY OF MONTICELLO
unmodified opinion that the city's financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016, are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
independent auditor's report is presented as the first component of the
financial section of this report.
The preparation of this CAFR is a requirement of state law. Also, the CAFR is
required by the bond rating agencies before they will rate the city's bonds. The
report can be used by the city council and the citizens of the city to gain a
better understanding of the financial condition of the city.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
require that management provide a narrative introduction, overview, and
analysis to accompany the basic financial statements in the form of
Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). This letter of transmittal is
designed to complement the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it.
The city's MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the auditors.
PROFILE OF THE CITY
The city is situated in a prime location on Interstate 94 between the cities of
Minneapolis/St. Paul and St. Cloud. The city has experienced remarkable
growth within the last 15 years in the residential, commercial, office, and retail
sectors. The city is freestanding urban fringe community encompassing
approximately 5,000 acres and a population of 13,299. The city is home to
one of Minnesota's two nuclear power plants, both owned by Xcel Energy, Inc.
(NYSE: XEL). With a small carbon footprint, the Xcel plant is also the city's
largest employer and property taxpayer. Additionally, Monticello's business
friendly environment provides a home for Cargill Kitchen Solutions. The
privately -owned, agri-giant is the city's largest customer of water and sewage
utility services.
The city was founded by second -generation Americans who migrated west in
the mid -1800s. Early settlers found the gently sloping banks and shallow river
levels of the Mississippi River made a logical place for a river crossing.
Incorporated in 1856, the city grew quickly during the early settlement years
and then leveled to a population of about 1,300. It was this original settlement
that became the core city and survives today as downtown Monticello.
The city has 501(a) status and operates under the "Optional Plan A" form of
government as defined in Minnesota Statutes. Under this plan, the
government of the city is directed by a city council composed of an elected
mayor and four elected council members. The city council exercises legislative
authority and determines all matters of policy. The city council appoints
personnel responsible for the proper administration of all affairs relating to the
Letter of Transmittal
city. Council members serve four-year terms, with two members elected every
two years. The mayor is elected for a two-year term. The mayor and members
of the city council are elected at large.
The city provides a full range of services: the construction and maintenance
of streets and other infrastructure; snow removal; park and cemetery
maintenance; recreational and cultural activities; water, sewer, surface water,
residential garbage, and recycling systems; community development, building
inspection, planning, police, fire, and liquor store operations; a city -run fiber
optic system and community center; and general government operations,
including administration, finance/accounting, information systems, community
information, and general government buildings.
The city council is required to adopt a final budget by late December for the
subsequent year. The budget is prepared by fund, function (e.g. public works),
and department (e.g. streets and alleys). Transfers of appropriations between
funds require the approval of the city council. The legal level of budgetary
control is the department level in the General Fund and fund level in all other
funds. Budget amendments require city council approval.
FINANCIAL PLANNING AND THE LOCAL ECONOMY
The city is recovering slowly from recent economic woes that have affected
other communities in Wright County and throughout the state of Minnesota.
The nuclear power plant provides the city with a relatively stable tax and
employment base. During the economic downturn, new commercial
development came to virtual standstill and today growth remains anemic.
However, the city lost very few of its local businesses, although some reduced
their workforce and scaled back operations. The rapid residential growth
starting nearly a decade ago has slowed significantly but the city was not hit
with a large number of foreclosed homes.
In the past, the state of Minnesota has reduced local government aid (LGA)
and the market value homestead credit (MVHC) to cities and counties as a
way to balance its own budget. Since the city does not receive LGA, the city's
finances are relatively insulated from the state's budget problems. In 2012,
the state eliminated the MVHC and replaced it with a Market Value Exclusion
program, which the city incorporated into its 2016 budget. The new program
shifted more of the tax burden to nonresidential property taxpayers.
The economy and housing market has also affected city revenues for building
permits. The city issued 1,323 building permits in 2006 with a total valuation
of $45,572,690. In 2016, the city issued 802 permits with a total valuation of
$59,426,683. New residential infrastructure construction will need to occur to
support the same level of residential building permits in the future.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Fortunately, the city does not rely on the state as a major funding source
(LGA). In addition, the city has budgeted conservatively over the years,
resulting in very modest growth in the property tax levy. To assist external
stakeholders, the city is exploring various ways to better represent its financial
position, such as the elimination of all interfund loans/receivables in 2012.
Other initiatives include consolidating funds with similar purposes, distributing
unallocated expenses and aggregating similar costs for distribution as single
amounts to each budget unit. Further, staff continues to refine the chart of
accounts with the goal of providing better information to decision makers.
MAJOR INITIATIVES
The city has three major ongoing initiatives in 2016. The first ongoing initiative
is the revitalization of its historic downtown. The downtown is the oldest part
of the city and many buildings are in need of maintenance or demolition. In
addition, the amount of traffic on State Highway 25 and County Road 75
makes both vehicle and pedestrian traffic difficult to move from one area of
the downtown to another. Because of these issues, a number of the store
fronts are unoccupied. To address these issues, the city completed an
Embracing Downtown Monticello initiative with the goal to identify needed
improvements and enhancements, which will once again make the downtown
area a vibrant shopping and resident destination. The challenge moving
2
Letter of Transmittal
forward will be the implementation of the plan and creating development
opportunities within the downtown area for new and existing businesses.
The second ongoing initiative is the joint purchase with Wright County of
Bertram Chain of Lakes properties. The city and Wright County closed on the
last 245 acres of this originally plan park area. This 1,258 acre site includes
four pristine lakes and woodlands, which when developed will become a
regional park. Wright County and the city obtained matching grants from the
state to purchase much of acreage in the park.
Stabilizing the operations of the city fiber optics operations is the last initiative.
After a succession of general managers and settlement of the bondholder
claims, the city is positioned to move forward with a leaner, less expensive
telecommunications utility.
INTERNAL CONTROL
The management of the city is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control designed to ensure that the assets of the city are protected
from loss, theft, or misuse and that adequate accounting data is compiled to
allow for the preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The city's
internal controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute
assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable
assurance recognizes that: 1) the cost of a control should not exceed the
benefits likely to be derived, and 2) the valuation of cost and benefit requires
estimates and judgments by management. The city's internal controls are
subject to periodic evaluation by management and the Finance Department
staff of the city.
BUDGETING CONTROLS
In addition, the city maintains budgetary controls. The objective of these
budgetary controls is to assure compliance with legal provisions embodied in
the annual appropriated budget approved by the city council. Activities of the
General Fund are included in the annual appropriated budget. The level of
budgetary control (that is, the level at which expenditures cannot legally
exceed the appropriated amount) is established by department within the
General Fund. The city council also adopts a five-year Capital Improvement
Program as a financial planning document for its capital project and enterprise
funds. As demonstrated by the statements and schedules included in the
financial section of this report, the city continues to meet its responsibility for
sound financial management.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and
Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
Financial Reporting to the city for its CAFR for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2015. This was the fifth year that the city has achieved this prestigious
award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, the city had to
publish an easily readable and efficiently organized CAFR. This report must
satisfy both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and applicable legal requirements.
A certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe
that our current CAFR continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement
Program's requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine
its eligibility for another certificate.
The 2016 CAFR meets the highest professional standards and was prepared
in a timely and cost effective manner. The preparation of this report would not
have been possible without the efficient and dedicated service of the entire
staff of the finance department and through the helpful guidance and
assistance from our auditing firm, MMKR. I wish to express my appreciation
to all members of the department who assisted and contributed to the
preparation of this report. Credit also must be given to the mayor and city
council for their unfailing support for maintaining the highest standards of
professionalism in the management of the city's finances.
Respectfully
{submitted,
S 0,�
Wayne W. Oberg, MBA, CPA Sarah K. Rathlisberger
Finance Director Finance Manager
Certificate of Achievement
6�
Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of Monticello
Minnesota
For its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2015
Executive Director/CEO
CITY OF MONTICELLO
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States
and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate for Excellence in
Financial Reporting to the City of Monticello, Minnesota for its
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2015. The Certificate of Achievement is a prestigious
national award recognizing conformance with the highest standards
for preparation of state and local government reports.
In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental
unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, whose contents conform
to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally
accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements.
A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only.
We believe our current report continues to conform to Certificate of
Achievement program requirements, and we are submitting it to the
GFOA.
4
Organization Chart
Citizens of
Monticello
1
City HCommissions
Council &Boards
1
City
lAdministratorl
Human Finance
Community
City
Public
Resource - Director
- Development
- Engineer
- Works
Director
Director
Director
Finance
Economic
Construction
Streets
- Department
- Development
- Inspectors
- Department
Data
Building
Consulting
Parks
- Processing
- Inspections
- Engineer
- Department
Audit
Receptionist
Utilities
-
-
- Department
Department Consulting Refuse
- of Motor - Planner - Collection
Vehicles
Liquor
- Operations
Community
Deputy
Center
City
Director
Clerk
Community Elections
Center
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Fire Contracted
Chief - Services
Fire City
Department - Attorney
Sheriffs
- Department
Animal
- Control
County
Assessor
FiberNet
Operation
Directory of Officials
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
CITY STAFF
Position
Name
Term Expires
Mayor.....................................................................................
Brian Stumpf
12/31/2018
Council..................................................................................
Glen Posusta
12/31/2016
Council...................................................................................
Tom Perrault
12/31/2016
Council....................................................................................
Lloyd Hilgart
12/31/2018
Council..............................................................................Charlotte
Gabler
12/31/2018
City Administrator ..........................
Finance Director ............................
Community Development Director
Public Works Director ...................
Economic Development Director..
City Clerk .......................................
Human Resource Manager...........
Liquor Store Manager ...................
DMV Manager ...............................
Finance Manager ..........................
Utility Superintendent ....................
Street Superintendent ...................
Parks Superintendent ...................
Community Center Director ..........
Chief Building Official ....................
Fire Chief .......................................
Communications Coordinator .......
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
City Attorney........
City Engineer.......
Law Enforcement
Financial Advisor.
...............Jeff O'Neill
.......... Wayne Oberg
...Angela Schumann
..........Wayne Oberg
...............Jeff O'Neill
...Jennifer Schreiber
........... Tracy Ergen
..... Randall Johnsen
..... Carolyn Granger
Sarah Rathlisberger
.......... Matt Theisen
............Tom Moores
............ Tom Pawelk
............ Ann Mosack
...............John Rued
..............Daryl Gilles
.......Rachel Leonard
..........Campbell Knutson, P.A.
.................. WSB & Associates
Wright County Sherriff's Office
........Northland Securities, Inc.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
0
`�` _ - - -- _.�7E _`_�� - _71�_.P-' •.mow-_� - - - L
77
-vy1 - +
���_ _��-'' �►1 ' � -�_' �` - � _ - � - r - - moi' - �� � �. _ _ � _ '
-J; Y;-�
STI
air—
_ a�
CERTI FIEI
ACCOUN
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the City Council and Management
City of Monticello, Minnesota
REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the
governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and
the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Monticello,
Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and
the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise
the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of
these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the
design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the
preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements
based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the
standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing
Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
Princivals
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
Victoria L. Holinka, CPA
assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material
misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the
risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers
internal control relevant to the City's preparation and fair presentation of
the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly,
we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
OPINIONS
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental
activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate
remaining fund information of the City as of December 31, 2016, and the
(continued)
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co., P.A. 7
5353 Wayxaca Boulevard • Suire 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952-545-0424 • TeleFax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows
thereof, for the year then ended, in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
OTHER MATTERS
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
require that the management's discussion and analysis and the required
supplementary information (RSI), as listed in the table of contents, be
presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information,
although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the
Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an
essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial
statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context.
We have applied certain limited procedures to the RSI in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America,
which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods ofpreparing
the information and comparing the information for consistency with
management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements,
and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial
statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the
information because the limited procedures do not provide us with
sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Other Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the
financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial
statements. The introductory section, combining and individual fund
financial statements and schedules, and statistical section, as listed in the
table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are
not required parts of the basic financial statements.
The combining and individual fund statements and schedules are the
responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to
the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic
financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain
additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such
information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used
to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial
statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In
our opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in
relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the
auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements
and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance
on them.
OTHER REPORTING REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENTAUDITING
,STANDARDS
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued
our report dated June 20, 2017 on our consideration of the City's internal
control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with
certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and
other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our
testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the
results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control
over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of
an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in
considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and
compliance.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 20, 2017
12
-;1r-:_ — ,''+�--`' _ � l '�r'`s�->>►' -w '_tom 47'r � � ,�` `'-?. ts- r -- -�
Ira
dlp
-- E�NT�I`SC= AND I11i LYSISmr-
T
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Management's Discussion and Analysis
As management of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the city), we offer readers
of the city's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the
financial activities of the city for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. We
encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction
with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal,
which can be found on pages 1-3 of this report.
Overview of the Basic Financial Statements
The discussion and analysis are intended to serve as an introduction to the city's
basic financial statements. The city's basic financial statements comprise three
components: 1) government -wide financial statements, 2) fund financial
statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains
other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements
themselves.
COMPONENTS OF
THE ANNUAL FINANICAL REPORT
----------------- n
Management's Basic Required
Discussion and Financial Supplementary
Analysis Statements Information
------------------�
Government -wide Fund I Notes to the
Financial Financial Statements Financial Statements
Statements
Summary q
Detail
Government -Wide Financial Statements — The government -wide financial
statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the city's
finances, in a manner similar to private sector businesses.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
The Statement of Net Position presents information on all of the city's assets
and deferred outflows of resources, and liabilities and deferred inflows of
resources, with the difference between them reported as net position. Overtime,
increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of
whether the financial position of the city is improving or deteriorating.
The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the city's net
position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position
are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs,
regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses
are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows
in future fiscal periods (delinquent taxes and special assessments).
Both of the government -wide financial statements distinguish functions of the
city that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenue
(governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or
a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business -type
activities). The governmental activities provided by the city include general
government, public safety, public works, sanitation, transit, recreation and
culture, and economic development. Business -type activities include water,
sewage, liquor, fiber optics, and deputy registrar activities.
The government -wide financial statements include not only the city itself (known
as the primary government), but also the Economic Development Authority
(EDA). The EDA is a legally separate entity which functions, in essence, as a
department of the city, to provide redevelopment assistance through the
administration of various programs. Therefore, the EDA has been included as
an integral part of the city's financial statements.
The government -wide financial statements can be found on pages 19-21 of this
report.
Fund Financial Statements — A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is
used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific
activities or objectives. The city, like other state and local governments, uses
fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance -related
legal requirements. All of the funds of the city can be divided into two categories:
governmental funds and proprietary funds.
Governmental Funds — Governmental funds are used to account for
essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the
government -wide financial statements. However, unlike the government -wide
financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-
term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as the balances of
0
Management's Discussion and Analysis
spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information
may be useful in evaluating a government's near-term financing requirements.
Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the
government -wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information
presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for
governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. By doing
so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government's
near-term financing decisions. Both the governmental funds Balance Sheet and
Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances provide
a reconciliation to facilitate the comparison between governmental funds and
governmental activities.
The city maintains several individual governmental funds. Information is
presented separately in the governmental funds Balance Sheet and in the
governmental funds Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in
Fund Balances for the General Fund, Community Center Special Revenue
Fund, EDA Special Revenue Fund, Debt Service Fund, and Capital Projects
Fund, all of which are considered to be major funds. Data from the remaining
governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation.
Individual fund data for each of these nonmajor governmental funds is provided
in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report.
The city adopts an annual budget for its General Fund and major special
revenue funds. A budgetary comparison schedule has been provided within the
required supplementary information for the General Fund and major special
revenue funds to demonstrate compliance with the adopted budgets.
The governmental fund financial statements can be found on pages 22-25 of
this report.
Proprietary Funds — The city maintains two different types of proprietary funds.
Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business -
type activities in the government -wide financial statements. The city maintains
five enterprise funds which are considered proprietary funds. Enterprise funds
are used to report the same functions presented as business -type activities in
the government -wide financial statements. The city uses enterprise funds to
account for its water and sewage service operations, liquor sales operation,
fiber optics, and deputy registrar operations. Internal service funds are an
accounting device used to accumulate and allocate costs internally among the
city's various functions. The city uses internal service funds to account for
benefits accruals, information technology (IT) services, and central equipment
services. Because these internal service fund activities predominantly benefit
governmental rather than business -type functions, they have been included
within governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government -wide
financial statements, only in more detail. The proprietary fund financial
statements provide separate information for each of the enterprise operations.
The internal service funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation
in the proprietary fund financial statements. Individual fund data for the internal
service funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this
report.
The proprietary fund financial statements can be found on pages 26-31 of this
report.
Notes to Basic Financial Statements — The notes to basic financial
statements provide additional information that is essential to obtaining a full
understanding of the data provided in the government -wide and fund financial
statements.
The notes to the basic financial statements can be found on pages 32-55 of this
report.
Other Information — In addition to the basic financial statements and
accompanying notes, this report presents required supplementary information
on activity related to the defined benefit pension plans and the other post -
employment benefits (OPEB) plan as well as budgetary comparison
information. Combining statements for nonmajor governmental funds, internal
service funds, and other supplementary schedules including activities of the
General, nonmajor Special Revenue, Economic Development Authority, and
Debt Service funds, can also be found in the combining individual fund
statements section of this report.
Required supplementary information and combining individual fund statements
can be found starting on page 57.
10
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Financial Highlights
The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the city exceeded its liabilities
and deferred inflows of resources at year-end by $122,538,258 (net position).
Of this amount, $29,876,760 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet
the city's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.
As of the close of the current fiscal year, the city's governmental funds reported
combined ending fund balances of $30,275,002, an increase of $1,298,752, or
4.5 percent. Nonspendable, restricted, and assigned uses of fund balance
totaled $24,132,527, leaving an unassigned fund balance of $6,142,475. The
2016 year-end unassigned fund balance is $1,268,981 or 26 percent, higher
than the 2015 ending balance.
At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance for the General
Fund was $6,142,475, or 87.8 percent, of total General Fund expenditures for
2016. The city targets 45 percent of next year's expenditure budget as the
optimum fund balance level, providing a reserve for cash flow during the first six
months of each subsequent year until property tax receipts are released from
the county treasurer's office and distributed to the local levels of government.
The state auditor recommends that local governments maintain an unrestricted
fund balance of approximately 35-50 percent of operating revenues or no less
than five months of operating expenditures for the General Fund. The General
Fund's heavy dependence on property tax revenues validates the 45 percent
target. (Source: Minnesota Office of the State Auditor: Fund Balance Reporting
and Governmental Fund Type Definitions, based on Governmental Accounting
Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, 2010-1003 Revised July 2012).
In 2016, government -wide capital assets increased by $3,271,997 due to
disposals and depreciation on existing assets lagged acquisitions. All
governmental activities land acquisitions occurred at Bertram Chain of Lakes
park. The $1,017,795 increase included the portion of land the city is
responsible for maintaining and excluded the portion Wright County is
responsible for maintaining. Wright County is a 50/50 partner and will maintain
the lakes and trails section of the park. The city will maintain the athletic facilities
section. Other acquisitions include improvements at the intersection of TH25
CITY OF MONTICELLO
and County Hwy 75 as well as the 2016 Street Reconstruction project and a
retaining wall along Hillside Cemetery on 7th Street to prepare for intersection
improvements at TH25 and 7th Street to be completed in 2017. Internal service
funds acquisitions include two new vehicles, a pavement cutter, and a 10 -foot
mower.
The city's total long-term bonded indebtedness decreased by $54,418, or 0.2
percent, in 2016. Principal payments made on outstanding debt totaled
$6,367,483. The city issued $4,900,000 in general obligations bonds to finance
capital project costs and $1,413,065 of PFA loan for wastewater treatment plant
improvements in 2016. The 2016A general obligation bonds are accounted for
in the Debt Service Fund and will be paid from special assessments and
property taxes. The PFA loan is accounted for in the Sewage Fund and utility
customer charges will generate the cash needed for repayment of this debt.
11
Management's Discussion and Analysis
GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Current and other assets
Capital assets
Total assets
Deferred outflows of resources
Long-term liabilities
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Deferred inflows of resources
Net position
Net investment in capital assets
Restricted
Unrestricted
Total net position
NET POSITION
Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities
2016 2015 2016 2015
$ 37, 757,171
60, 637, 933
98, 395,104
1,522,334
24,958,930
1,723,032
26,681,962
763,930
41,077,683
10, 569, 693
20, 824,170
$ 36,074,680
58, 497, 221
94,571,901
270,113
24,186, 732
1,399,698
25, 586, 430
378,179
38, 099, 568
12,633,770
18,144, 067
$ 10, 607, 848
45, 429, 326
56, 037,174
524,942
5,748,887
543,065
6,291,952
203,452
41,014,122
9,052,590
$ 9,984,124
44,298,041
54, 282,165
129,955
4,762,207
541,740
5,303,947
222,104
40, 722, 087
8,163, 982
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Total
2016 2015
$ 48, 365, 019 $ 46, 058, 804
106, 067, 259 102, 795, 262
154,432, 278 148, 854, 066
2,047,276
30, 707, 817
2,266,097
32,973,914
967,382
82,091,805
10, 569, 693
29, 876, 760
28, 948, 939
1,941,438
30, 890, 377
600,283
78,821,655
12, 633, 770
26, 308, 049
$ 72, 471, 546 $ 68, 877, 405 $ 50, 066, 712 $ 48, 886, 069 $ 122, 538, 258 $ 117, 763, 474
By the far the largest portion of the city's net position (67%) reflects investment
in capital assets (e.g. land, buildings, structures, systems, machinery,
equipment, infrastructure, and intangible assets), net of any related debt used
to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The city uses assets to provide
services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future
spending. Although the city's investment in capital assets is reported net of
related debt, it should be noted that resources needed to repay this debt must
be provided from other sources, since capital assets themselves cannot be used
to liquidate these liabilities.
A small portion of the city's net position (9%) represents resources that are
subject to external restrictions on how they can be used. The remaining
unrestricted net position of $29,876,760 may be used to meet the ongoing
obligations to citizens and creditors. Of the unrestricted net position, $9,052,590
(30%) is attributable to business -type activities.
The unrestricted governmental activities net position increased $2,680,103
(15%), while business -type activities unrestricted net position increased
$888,608 (11 %). The government -wide total unrestricted net position increased
$3,568,711 (14%), reflecting revenues exceeding conservative budgeted
estimates.
The $2,140,712 (4%) increase in governmental activities capital assets is
reflective of capital asset purchases and reinvestment exceeding depreciation
and disposals. Business -type capital assets increased $1,131,285 (3%) also
due to reinvestment exceeding depreciation.
Net investment in capital assets, which is capital assets less related debt,
increased with Bertram Chain of Lakes land acquisitions and improvements at
the wastewater treatment plant. The land was not acquired with debt. A grant
along with debt financed the treatment plant improvements.
12
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Revenues
Program revenues
Charges for services
Operating grants and contributions
Capital grants and contributions
General revenues
Property taxes
Tax increments
Franchise taxes
Unrestricted investment earnings
Gain on sale of assets
Total revenues
Expenses
General government
Public safety
Public works
Sanitation
Transit
Recreation and culture
Economic development
Interest and fiscal charges
Water utility
Sewage utility
Liquor
Fiber optics
Deputy registrar
Total expenses
Increase in net position
before transfers and special items
Transfers
Special item: contribution of land to county
Special item: transfer of operations
Change in net position
Net position, January 1
Net position, December 31
CITY OF MONTICELLO
CHANGE IN NET POSITION
Governmental Activities
Business -Type Activities
Total
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
$ 3,524,892
$ 2,663,578
$ 7,107,373
$ 6,912,512
$ 10,632,265 $
9,576,090
389,005
355,041
-
-
389,005
355,041
3,297,265
2,667,710
2,000,456
1,454,980
5,297,721
4,122,690
9,270,592
8,683,585
-
-
9,270,592
8,683,585
668,352
727,617
-
668,352
727,617
412,217
333,484
-
-
412,217
333,484
375,614
278,465
128,080
108,191
503,694
386,656
11,180
30,473
5,218
88,157
16,398
118,630
17,949,117
15,739,953
9,241,127
8,563,840
27,190,244
24,303,793
1,694,111
1,447,725
-
-
1,694,111
1,447,725
2,187, 363
1,960,009
-
2,187, 363
1,960,009
5,480,074
5,312,612
-
5,480,074
5,312,612
600,300
563,477
-
600,300
563,477
41,250
40,000
-
41,250
40,000
3,998,945
3,524,979
-
3,998,945
3,524,979
756,620
1,547,875
-
756,620
1,547,875
565,774
735,753
-
-
565,774
735,753
-
-
1,168,473
1,102,610
1,168,473
1,102,610
-
2,618,887
2,661,990
2,618,887
2,661,990
-
831,809
798,631
831,809
798,631
-
2,483,262
2,536,461
2,483,262
2,536,461
-
-
345,492
313,968
345,492
313,968
15,324,437
15,132,430
7,447,923
7,413,660
22,772,360
22,546,090
2,624,680
607,523
1,793,204
1,150,180
4,417,884
1,757,703
969,461
2,301,045
(969,461)
(2,301,045)
-
-
-
(5,511,547)
-
-
(5,511,547)
-
356,900
356,900
3,594,141
(2,602,979)
1,180,643
(1,150,865)
4,774,784
(3,753,844)
68,877,405
71,480,384
48,886,069
50,036,934
117,763,474
121,517,318
$ 72,471,546
$ 68,877,405
$ 50,066,712
$ 48,886,069
$ 122,538,258 $
117,763,474
13
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Property
52°
Revenues by Source -
Governmental Activities
Investment Charges for
earnings services
2% 20
rl--ri.,7 grants &
rutions
4% rrancnise taxes
2%
Program Expenses and Revenues -
Governmental Activities
$6
$5
$4
$3
c $2
0
r1
Cie Q -e Goo c�ece
■ Program Expenses ■ Program Revenues
I grants &
'ibutions
18%
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Governmental Activities. The most significant revenue source for
governmental activities is property taxes at 52% of total revenues. Property
taxes support the General Fund, Community Center Fund, Capital Project Fund,
and Debt Service Fund. Charges for services accounts for 20% of revenues,
most of which is generated by the Community Center. Capital grants and
contributions include special assessments and revenues from other sources
restricted to capital asset acquisition. Investment earnings include both interest
received and the increase (decrease) in the investment fair values. Tax
increments are property taxes collected in tax increment financing districts and
are restricted for development purposes.
Public works (engineering, streets, ice and snow removal, shop and garage,
street lighting, etc.) expenses are the most significant (36%), followed by
recreation and culture (26%), public safety (14%), general government (11 %),
economic development (5%), sanitation (4%), and others (4%). Included in
these amounts is depreciation expense, which is 27% of the total expenses for
governmental activities.
Governmental activities revenues increased $2,209,164 (14%) in the current
year, with the most significant portions of the increase attributable to charges
for services and capital grants & contributions. In 2016, the negative change in
investment fair values decreased the interest earnings by 2%. Governmental
activities investment earnings for 2016 totaled $375,614. Property taxes
increased by 6.8 percent, bolstered by the addition of new HRA levy of
$280,000. Capital grants and contributions were affected by new assessments
and federal/state aid for road construction.
Governmental activities expenses increased $192,007 (1 %) in the current year.
The most significant changes in program expenses were as follows:
• Recreation and culture increased $473,966 (13%) with larger operational
and development planning expenditures and recognition of additional
employee pension benefits.
• Recognition of additional pension benefits had major impacts on public
safety (+12% or $227,354), public works (+3% or $167,462), and general
government (+17% or $246,386)
• Economic development expenses decreased $791,255 (51%) with a much
smaller downward value adjustment of land held for resale and less activity
in the tax increment financing districts.
• Interest and fiscal charges declined 23% with amortization and redemption
of higher interest debt and the addition of lower interest debt.
14
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Capital grants &
Revenues by Source -
Business -Type Activities
Investment
earnings
$4.5
$4.0
$3.5
$3.0
$2.5
$2.0
$1.5
$1.0
$0.5
Charges for
services
77%
Program Revenues and Expenses -
Business -Type Activities
Water Utility Sewage Utility Liquor
■ Revenues ■ Expenses
Fiber Optics Deputy Registrar
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Business -type Activities. Business -type activities increased the city's net
position by $1,180,643, which is $2,331,508 more than the prior fiscal year
decrease of $1,150,865.
Key elements of the change are as follows:
A grant (capital contribution) for wastewater treatment plant improvements and
lower transfers to the Debt Service Fund are primarily responsible for the
increase in net position. The enterprise funds started supporting debt service
when water and sewage impact fees declined.
Business -type activities investment earnings for 2016 totaled $128,080. This is
a $19,889 increase over the prior year's investment earnings of $108,191.
Swings in investment fair values did not have a significant impact on net
investment earnings in 2016.
Capital grants and contributions for water and sewer trunk charges are now
accounted for in each respective enterprise fund. The city also recorded capital
contributions from a MPFA grant. Capital contributions for 2016 totaled
$2,000,456, an increase of $545,476 (37%) over the prior year.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S FUNDS
Governmental funds. The focus of the city's governmental funds is to provide
information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable
resources. Such information is useful in assessing the city's financing
requirements. In particular, spendable fund balances may serve as a useful
measure of a government's net resources available for expenditure at the end
of the fiscal year.
At December 31, 2016, the city's governmental funds reported total ending fund
balances of $30,275,002, an increase of $1,298,752 (4%) when compared with
the prior year. Nearly 23% or $6,987,234 of the total ending fund balances
constituted restricted fund balances, which are considered unavailable for
appropriation for general operations. The $3,824,575 nonspendable fund
balance accounted for 13% of total governmental fund balances and is
comprised of land held for resale and prepaid items.
At the end of the fiscal year, the General Fund reported a fund balance of
$6,276,720, increasing $1,289,924 (26%) from the prior year. General fund
revenues were $633,910 (8%) more than the prior fiscal year and expenditures
increased by $277,443 (4%). Transfers out decreased by $297,012 to zero.
15
Management's Discussion and Analysis
General government expenditures increased $24,434 (2%) with most of the
increase related to employee costs. Streets & alleys and public works
inspections were largely responsible for the $93,821 (5%) increase in public
works expenditures. Recreation and culture expenditures increased by $57,324
(6%) primarily caused by additional internal service fund equipment leasing and
rises in employee costs. Public safety expenditures increased $63,729 (3%)
with inflation to the Wright County law enforcement contract and increased
activity in building inspection.
The fund balance in the Community Center Fund increased $132,387 (21 %) to
$761,829. Charges for services decreased $5,451 (less than 1 %) to $1,395,573
in 2016. Expenditures increased $76,802 (5%) to $1,654,445. The community
center debt was fully amortized at the end of 2015.
The fund balance in Economic Development Authority (EDA) Fund increased
$579,465 (9%) to $7,142,330. The assigned fund balance, which is available for
general EDA activity, equaled $2,835,268 at year end. Land held for resale
declined $489,000 (18%) to $2,193,957. Land held for resale receives the same
accounting treatment, lower of cost or fair value, as inventory. The EDA
recorded a $288,402 gain on the 2016 sale of one parcel with a book value of
$418,900. The EDA received $279,422 in property tax revenue in 2016. At year
end, the restricted $2,274,667 portion of the fund balance is attributable to tax
increment districts and loan programs.
The fund balance in the Debt Service Fund decreased $1,838,663 (34%) to
$3,543,551. This planned fund balance decrease reflects prior year
accumulation of resources to make the February debt service payment, which
in one case is the last large payment due on an issue. Additionally, the city
redeemed early a total of $1,061,000 in debt principal on two issues. Special
assessment revenue decreased $1,420,856 (64%) to $812,547. One property
owner's payment of future assessments contributed significantly to the 2015
total. In governmental funds, assessments are recorded as a revenue when
collectible, whether it is in the current period or soon thereafter.
The Capital Projects Fund provides the accounting for acquisition of general
government capital assets. Accordingly, the fund accumulates resources from
various sources and expenditures may or may not occur in the same year of
accumulation. Consequently, the fund balance in the Capital Projects Fund
increased $1,492,016 (28%) to $6,884,229. The $1,631,789 nonspendable
portion of the fund balance is land held for resale. Proceeds from a 2016
$4,900,000 general obligation bond issue are accounted for in this fund. Various
assessment and street reconstruction projects were financed by this issue. The
$753,500 transfer to the Park and Pathway Dedication Fund went toward
Bertram land acquisition or will finance various 2017 park projects.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Proprietary funds. The proprietary funds provide the same type of information
found in the government -wide financial statements, but in more detail.
Water Fund expenses increased $67,006 (6%) with higher personal services
costs. Utility employee personal service costs are divided between the Water
Fund and Sewage Fund based on activity. The Water Fund transferred
$199,327 to Debt Service Fund for improvements related to the water system.
The fund's net position increased $61,726 (less than 1%) to $14,390,486.
Depreciation expense for the fund totaled $502,447.
Sewage Fund expenses decreased $28,244 (1%). The Sewage Fund
transferred out $770,134 to the Debt Service Fund for improvements related to
the sewage system. The 2016 capital contributions of $1,812,602 included a
$726,157 grant for wastewater treatment plant improvements. The fund's net
position increased $675,582 (3%) to $20,489,128. Depreciation expense for the
fund totaled $1,142,479.
The Liquor Fund's net position increased $236,021 (26%) to $1,141,827. The
fund's sales decreased $40,846 (1 %) to $5,448,584. A road construction project
contributed to the decline. Gross profit decreased $112,483 (7%) to $1,407,360.
The Liquor Fund transferred $350,000 to the Fiber Optics Fund in 2016.
Operating expenses increased $34,503 (4%) to $836,048 in 2016. Depreciation
expense for the fund totaled $40,512.
The Fiber Optics Fund's net position decreased $38,671 to $13,361,470. The
fund's 2016 sales increased $28,536 (2%) to $1,692,935. Excluding
depreciation, the operating loss decreased from $367,607 to $331,799 in 2016.
Depreciation for the fund totaled $419,555. The city contracted for FiberNet
management an operations starting July 1, 2016.
The Deputy Registrar Fund (DMV) net position increased $220,047 (54%) to
$629,881. Charges for services increased $30,367 (6%) to $561,775 and
operating expenses increased $33,431 (9%) to $352,117. Depreciation for the
fund totaled $3,185. In 2016, the DMV processed 75,891 transactions, a 5%
increase over the prior year.
Other factors of the changes in income from operations have previously been
discussed in the government -wide financial analysis of business -type activities.
16
Management's Discussion and Analysis
GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS
General Fund revenues and other financing sources totaled $8,282,736 and
exceeded budget by 686,736 (9%). Licenses and permits and other revenues
were $329,702 (97%) and $178,824 (210%) higher than budget, respectively.
Licenses and permits were impacted by the increase in building permits. Other
revenues include an insurance dividend, which varies from year-to-year and is
never budgeted.
General Fund expenditures totaled $6,992,812 and were $603,188 (8%) less
than budget. With position vacancies, low fuel costs, and mild winter, public
works was $443,118 (20%) less than budget. One function exceeded budget
(transit). Within the functions, eight of thirty-five reporting units exceeded
budget.
CAPITAL ASSETS AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION
CITY OF MONTICELLO
The General Fund year end fund balances since 2011 are as follows:
CAPITAL ASSETS
Year
Amount
2011
$ 4,410,637
2012
3,478,507
2013
3,914,563
2014
4,331,058
2015
4,986,796
2016
6,276,720
Net total
$ 60, 637, 933 $ 58, 497, 221
Capital assets. The city's investment in capital assets for its governmental and
business -type activities at December 31, 2016 totaled $106,067,259 (net of
accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets included land,
construction in progress, structures, systems, machinery and equipment,
intangible assets, and infrastructure.
$ 45, 429, 326 $ 44, 298, 041 $ 106, 067, 259 $ 102, 795, 262
Central Equipment Fund of $138,236. Business -type capital assets acquisitions
included wastewater treatment plant improvements—two digester covers and
building and equipment for phosphorous reduction. The total increase from the
prior fiscal year is approximately 3%; governmental activities increased nearly 4%
and business -type activities increased 3%.
Major governmental activities capital assets changes: a $1,017,795 acquisition of Additional information on the city's capital assets can be found in the notes to the
Bertram Chain of Lakes park land; purchase of equipment in the internal service financial statements on pages 42-43.
17
Governmental Activities
Business -Type Activities
Total
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
Land
$ 9,573,164
$ 8,555,369
$ 1,197, 945
$ 1,197, 945
$ 10, 771,109
$ 9,753,314
Construction in progress
3,276,184
1,264,456
3,683,078
1,491,882
6,959,262
2,756,338
Buildings and systems
95,713,651
92,636,026
80,099,747
79,100,343
175,813,398
171,736,369
Machinery and equipment
5,518,993
5,425,323
2,480,276
2,543,832
7,999,269
7,969,155
Less: Accumulated depreciation
(53,444,059)
(49,383,953)
(42,031,720)
(40,035,961)
(95,475,779)
(89,419,914)
Net total
$ 60, 637, 933 $ 58, 497, 221
Capital assets. The city's investment in capital assets for its governmental and
business -type activities at December 31, 2016 totaled $106,067,259 (net of
accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets included land,
construction in progress, structures, systems, machinery and equipment,
intangible assets, and infrastructure.
$ 45, 429, 326 $ 44, 298, 041 $ 106, 067, 259 $ 102, 795, 262
Central Equipment Fund of $138,236. Business -type capital assets acquisitions
included wastewater treatment plant improvements—two digester covers and
building and equipment for phosphorous reduction. The total increase from the
prior fiscal year is approximately 3%; governmental activities increased nearly 4%
and business -type activities increased 3%.
Major governmental activities capital assets changes: a $1,017,795 acquisition of Additional information on the city's capital assets can be found in the notes to the
Bertram Chain of Lakes park land; purchase of equipment in the internal service financial statements on pages 42-43.
17
Management's Discussion and Analysis
OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS
Governmental Business -Type
Activities Activities
2016 2015 2016 2015
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Total
2016 2015
General obligation bonds $ 7,686,000 $ 9,563,000 $ 2,460,000 $ 2,930,347 $ 10,146,000 $ 12,493,347
Certificate of indebtedness 265,000 325,000 - - 265,000 325,000
Special assessment bonds 12,730,000 11,689,653 - - 12,730,000 11,689,653
Public facilities authority loan - - 1,927,850 615,268 1,927,850 615,268
Total $ 20,681,000 $ 21,577,653 $ 4,387,850 $ 3,545,615 $ 25,068,850 $ 25,123,268
Long-term Debt. The city's outstanding long-term debt --including general
obligation bonds, special assessment bonds, revenue bonds and certificates of
indebtedness—totaled $25,068,850 at December 31, 2016. Business -type
long-term debt increased with the addition of debt (public facilities authority
loan) related to the wastewater plant improvements. Meanwhile, the city issued
$4,900,000 in general obligation bonds to finance 2016 and 2017 street
projects. In 2016, the city redeemed $1,266,000 in bonds due in 2017 and 2018.
All other changes are the result of normal amortization.
Additional information on the city's long-term liabilities can be found in the notes
to the financial statements on pages 43-46 of this report.
ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR'S BUDGETS AND RATES
• The unemployment rate for the Wright County, Minnesota area for
December 31, 2016 was 4.3%, which is above the state average (4.1%)
and below the national average (4.5%).
• The state and local economy are improving. New commercial and
residential development grew at a sustainable pace in 2016.
• The occupancy rate of the city's business district has remained constant
over the last three years and new commercial construction is growing.
• Inflationary trends in the region compare favorably to national indices and
housing prices have risen the last two years.
• The prospects for continued residential and commercial growth in 2017
look promising.
REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION
This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the city's
finances for all those interested in governmental finance. Questions concerning
any information in the report or requests for additional information should be
addressed to City of Monticello, Finance Department, 505 Walnut Street, Suite
1, Monticello, MN 55362.
i�eflo
Mon
18
AMID-
- EIIIENTs
411111
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Statement of Net Position
December 31, 2016
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
19
Governmental
Business -type
Activities
Activities
Total
ASSETS
Cash and investments
$ 28,924,233
$ 8,789,589
$ 37,713,822
Receivables
Unremitted taxes
31,401
-
31,401
Deliquent taxes
62,473
-
62,473
Unremitted special assessments
10,307
162
10,469
Deliquent special assessments
146,904
14,960
161,864
Deferred special assessments
4,035,675
188,465
4,224,140
Accrued interest
129,564
-
129,564
Accounts, net uncollectibles allowance
74,511
938,279
1,012,790
Due from other governmental units
268,289
81,277
349,566
Internal balances
(53,920)
53,920
-
Inventory
-
480,648
480,648
Prepaid items
162,029
60,548
222,577
Notes receivable
116,779
-
116,779
Land held for resale
3,825,746
3,825,746
Pension asset
23,180
-
23,180
Capital assets
Nondepreciable
12,849,348
4,881,023
17,730,371
Depreciable, net
47,788,585
40,548,303
88,336,888
TOTAL ASSETS
98,395,104
56,037,174
154,432,278
DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Deferred pension resources
1,522,334
524,942
2,047,276
TOTAL DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES
1,522,334
524,942
2,047,276
LIABILITIES
Accounts and contracts payable
685,493
378,354
1,063,847
Accrued interest payable
99,455
5,283
104,738
Other accrued liabilities
47,080
3,336
50,416
Due to other governmental units
35,337
152,142
187,479
Unearned revenue
14,620
3,950
18,570
Escrow deposits
841,047
-
841,047
Long-term liabilities:
Due within one year
4,141,613
331,183
4,472,796
Due in more than one year
20,817,317
5,417,704
26,235,021
TOTAL LIABILITIES
26,681,962
6,291,952
32,973,914
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Deferred pension resources
628,126
203,452
831,578
Unavailable revenue - MSA state aid
135,804
-
135,804
TOTAL DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
763,930
203,452
967,382
NET POSITION
Net investment in capital assets
41,077,683
41,014,122
82,091,805
Restricted for
Debt service
7,009,231
-
7,009,231
Economic development
2,669,216
2,669,216
Perpetual care
30,489
30,489
Tax increment
860,757
-
860,757
Unrestricted
20,824,170
9,052,590
29,876,760
TOTAL NET POSITION
$ 72,471,546
$ 50,066,712
$ 122,538,258
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
19
lZCIOF
MontikeHo
(This page left blank intentionally)
20
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Statement of Activities
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
21
Program Revenues
Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Position
Operating
Capital
Charges for
Grants and
Grants and
Governmental
Business -type
Functions/Programs
Expenses Services
Contributions
Contributions
Activities
Activities
Total
Governmental activities
General government
$ 1,694,111 $ 274,309
$ -
$
$ (1,419,802)
$
$ (1,419,802)
Public safety
2,187,363 894,311
194,586
(1,098,466)
(1,098,466)
Public works
5,480,074 527,425
194,419
2,690,864
(2,067,366)
(2,067,366)
Sanitation
600,300 89,956
-
-
(510,344)
(510,344)
Transit
41,250 -
-
(41,250)
(41,250)
Recreation and culture
3,998,945 1,437,659
508,898
(2,052,388)
(2,052,388)
Economic development
756,620 301,232
-
(455,388)
(455,388)
Interest and fiscal charges
565,774 -
-
97,503
(468,271)
(468,271)
Total governmental activities
15,324,437 3,524,892
389,005
3,297,265
(8,113,275)
(8,113,275)
Business -type activities
Water Utility
1,168,473 1,172,258
-
187,854
191,639
191,639
Sewage Utility
2,618,887 2,223,252
1,812,602
1,416,967
1,416,967
Liquor
831,809 1,409,406
-
577,597
577,597
Fiber Optics
2,483,262 1,739,566
(743,696)
(743,696)
Deputy Registrar
345,492 562,891
-
217,399
217,399
Total business -type activities
7,447,923 7,107,373
-
2,000,456
1,659,906
1,659,906
Total primary government
$ 22,772,360 $ 10,632,265
$ 389,005
$ 5,297,721
(8,113,275)
1,659,906
(6,453,369)
General Revenues:
Property taxes
9,270,592
-
9,270,592
Tax increments
668,352
668,352
Franchise taxes
412,217
-
412,217
Unrestricted investment earnings
375,614
128,080
503,694
Gain on sale of capital assets
11,180
5,218
16,398
Special item - transfer of operations
-
356,900
356,900
Transfers
969,461
(969,461)
-
Total general revenues, special item, and tranfers
11,707,416
(479,263)
11,228,153
Change in Net Position
3,594,141
1,180,643
4,774,784
Net Position, January 1
68,877,405
48,886,069
117,763,474
Net Position, December 31
$ 72,471,546
$ 50,066,712
$ 122,538,258
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
21
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Balance Sheet
Governmental Funds
December 31, 2016
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement
22
Economic
Total
Total
Community
Development
Debt
Capital
Nonmajor
Governmental
General
Center
Authority
Service
Projects
Funds
Funds
ASSETS
Cash and investments
$
7,091,381
$
788,331
$
4,951,330
$
3,534,824
$ 5,726,923
$ 5,589,167
$
27,681,956
Receivables
Unremitted taxes
29,500
-
1,901
-
-
-
31,401
Delinquent taxes
61,733
740
-
-
62,473
Unremitted special assessments
-
-
9,975
332
10,307
Delinquent special assessments
325
9,279
137,300
146,904
Deferred special assessments
1,760
3,356,946
676,969
4,035,675
Accrued interest
129,564
-
-
-
-
129,564
Accounts
63,233
11,178
100
-
-
74,511
Due from other governmental units
30,398
-
-
150,127
87,764
268,289
Prepaid items
134,245
24,907
1,638
-
1,239
162,029
Notes receivable
-
-
-
-
116,779
116,779
Land held for resale
-
-
2,193,957
-
1,631,789
-
3,825,746
TOTAL ASSETS
$
7,542,139
$
824,416
$
7,149,666
$
6,911,024
$ 8,323,440
$ 5,794,949
$
36,545,634
LIABILITIES
Accounts and contracts payable
$
291,777
$
37,435
$
6,596
$
1,248
$ 335,901
$ 11,827
$
684,784
Other accrued liabilities
47,080
-
-
-
-
-
47,080
Due to other governmental units
21,697
10,532
3,108
35,337
Unearned revenue
-
14,620
-
14,620
Escrow deposits
841,047
-
-
-
-
-
841,047
Total liabilities
1,201,601
62,587
6,596
1,248
339,009
11,827
1,622,868
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Unavailable revenue - property taxes
61,733
-
740
-
-
-
62,473
Unavailable revenue - special assessments
2,085
-
3,366,225
814,271
-
4,182,581
Unavailable revenue - notes receivable
-
-
-
116,779
116,779
Unavailable revenue - grants receivable
150,127
-
150,127
Unavailable revenue - MSA state aid
-
-
-
135,804
-
135,804
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources
63,818
-
740
3,366,225
1,100,202
116,779
4,647,764
FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable
134,245
24,907
2,032,395
-
1,631,789
1,239
3,824,575
Restricted
-
-
2,274,667
3,543,551
-
1,169,016
6,987,234
Assigned
-
736,922
2,835,268
-
5,252,440
4,496,088
13,320,718
Unassigned
6,142,475
-
-
-
-
-
6,142,475
Total fund balance
6,276,720
761,829
7,142,330
3,543,551
6,884,229
5,666,343
30,275,002
TOTAL LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS
OF RESOURCES, AND FUND BALANCES
$
7,542,139
$
824,416
$
7,149,666
$
6,911,024
$ 8,323,440
$ 5,794,949
$
36,545,634
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement
22
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet
to the Statement of Net Position
December 31, 2016
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because
Total fund balances - governmental funds
$ 30,275,002
Long-term assets from pensions reported in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not
reported as assets in the funds.
23,180
Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported in the funds.
Land
$ 9,573,164
Construction in progress
3,276,184
Buildings and systems
95,713,651
Machinery and equipment
4,541,125
Accumulated depreciation
(53,256,979)
59,847,145
Governmental funds do not report long-term amounts related to pensions.
Deferred outflows of resources
$ 1,522,334
Deferred inflows of resources
(628,126)
894,208
Long-term liabilties that pertain to governmental funds, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current
period and, therefore, are not reported as fund liabilities. All liabilities, both current and long-term, are reported in
the Statement of Net Position.
Bonds payable
$ (19,956,000)
Unamortized bond discounts
21,032
Unamortized bond premiums
(180,298)
Other post -employment benefits obligations
(326,044)
Net pension liability
(3,532,958)
(23,974,268)
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of central equipment, information technology, and
benefit accrual services to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service funds are included in
governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position.
Internal service fund net position included in the governmental activities
$ 1,046,875
Less internal services net position allocated to to business -type activities
(53,920)
992,955
Some of the city's property taxes, special assessments, and notes receivable will be collected after year-end, but are not
available soon enough to pay for currrent period expenditures and, therefore, are reported as deferred inflows
of resources in the governmental funds.
4,511,960
Interest on long-term debt is not accrued in governmental funds, but rather is recognized as an expenditure when due.
Accrued interest for general obligation bonds is included in the Statement of Net Position.
(98,636)
NET POSITION OF GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
$ 72,471,546
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
23
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
24
Economic
Total
Total
Community
Development
Debt
Capital
Nonmajor
Governmental
General
Center
Authority
Service
Projects
Funds
Funds
Revenues
Property taxes
$ 6,204,429
$ 364,000
$ 279,422
$ 2,084,000
$ 364,132
$
$ 9,295,983
Tax increments
-
-
668,352
-
-
668,352
Franchise taxes
263,900
-
-
70,527
77,790
412,217
Special assessments
242
812,547
171,601
-
984,390
Licenses and permits
668,602
-
-
668,602
Intergovernmental
389,005
-
1,652,357
-
2,041,362
Charges for services
351,702
1,395,573
-
475,200
2,222,475
Fines and forfeitures
30,656
-
-
-
-
-
30,656
Investment earnings
99,237
14,986
60,528
36,423
54,783
91,155
357,112
Other revenues
263,783
12,273
290,409
-
5,000
17,929
589,394
Total revenues
8,271,556
1,786,832
1,298,711
2,932,970
2,318,400
662,074
17,270,543
Expenditures
Current
General government
1,489,892
-
-
-
-
-
1,489,892
Public safety
2,036,777
-
-
2,036,777
Public works
1,802,884
120,326
18,540
1,941,750
Sanitation
600,300
-
-
600,300
Transit
41,250
-
-
41,250
Recreation and culture
1,021,709
1,654,445
-
80,218
2,756,372
Economic development
-
-
530,746
-
-
530,746
Capital outlay
Public works
-
4,843,011
49,460
4,892,471
Recreation and culture
-
-
1,342,558
1,342,558
Debt service
Principal
5,681,653
-
5,681,653
Interest and fiscal charges
529,116
-
529,116
Bond issuance costs
-
-
-
-
107,050
-
107,050
Total expenditures
6,992,812
1,654,445
530,746
6,210,769
5,070,387
1,490,776
21,949,935
Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures
1,278,744
132,387
767,965
(3,277,799)
(2,751,987)
(828,702)
(4,679,392)
Other financing sources (uses)
Long-term debt issued
-
-
-
4,900,000
4,900,000
Premium on long-term debt issued
-
97,503
97,503
Sale of capital assets
11,180
-
-
-
11,180
Transfers in
-
1,439,136
753,500
2,192,636
Transfers out
-
(188,500)
-
(753,500)
(281,175)
(1,223,175)
Total other financing sources (uses)
11,180
-
(188,500)
1,439,136
4,244,003
472,325
5,978,144
Net change in fund balances
1,289,924
132,387
579,465
(1,838,663)
1,492,016
(356,377)
1,298,752
Fund balance at beginning of year
4,986,796
629,442
6,562,865
5,382,214
5,392,213
6,022,720
28,976,250
Fund balance at end of year
$ 6,276,720
$ 761,829
$ 7,142,330
$ 3,543,551
$ 6,884,229
$ 5,666,343
$ 30,275,002
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
24
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because
Net change in fund balances --governmental funds
$ 1,298,752
Governmental funds reported capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost
of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense.
This is the amount by which capital outlays exceeded depreciation in the current period.
Capital outlays
$
5,605,108
Capital contributions
508,898
Disposals
(6,858)
Depreciation
(4,020,765)
2,086,383
Proceeds from long-term debt provide financial resources to governmental funds, but the issuing of debt
increases long-term liabilities in the Statement of Net Position.
(4,900,000)
Repayment of long-term debt principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, but the repayment reduces
long-term liabilities in the Statement of Net Position.
5,681,653
Some expenses reported in the Statement of Activities do not require the use of current financial resources
and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in the governmental funds.
Amortization of bond discounts
$
(4,703)
Amortization of bond premiums
35,633
Change in OPEB obligation
(20,481)
Change accrued interest payable
55,644
66,093
Long-term pension activity is not reported in governmental funds
Pension revenue from state contributions
13,765
Pension expense
(643,432)
Deferred inflows of resources are revenues included in the change in net position, but are excluded from the change
in fund balances until they are available to liquidate liabilities of the current period.
Taxes
$
(25,391)
Special assessments
(96,010)
Notes receivable
(212,500)
Grants receivable
150,127
(183,774)
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities to individual funds
The net revenue of the internal service funds is reported with governmental activities.
Internal service fund activity included in governmental activities
$
200,639
Subtract internal service fund activity allocated to business -type activities
(25,938)
174,701
Change in net position of governmental activities
$ 3,594,141
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
25
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Statement of Net Position
Proprietary Funds
December 31, 2016
(continued)
26
Governmental
Business
-Type Activities
- Enterprise Funds
Activities -
Deputy
Internal
Water
Sewage
Liquor
Fiber Optics
Registrar
Totals
Service Funds
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and investments
$ 4,035,865
$ 2,596,530
$ 1,037,180
$ 303,008 $
817,006
$ 8,789,589
$ 1,242,277
Receivables
Unremitted special assessments
162
-
-
-
-
162
-
Deliquent special assessments
14,960
-
14,960
Deferred special assessments
176,102
12,363
-
-
188,465
Accounts
217,192
568,485
1,000
151,602
-
938,279
Due from other governmental units
-
36,447
-
-
44,830
81,277
Inventory
-
-
480,648
-
-
480,648
Prepaid items
12,984
25,515
16,283
3,541
2,225
60,548
-
Total current assets
4,457,265
3,239,340
1,535,111
458,151
864,061
10,553,928
1,242,277
Noncurrent assets
Capital assets:
Land
208,143
984,202
5,600
-
-
1,197,945
-
Buildings and systems
20,807,724
43,467,040
840,217
14,896,665
88,101
80,099,747
-
Machineryandequipment
262,198
1,763,559
134,528
305,726
14,265
2,480,276
977,868
Construction in progress
-
3,683,078
-
-
-
3,683,078
-
Total capital assets
21,278,065
49,897,879
980,345
15,202,391
102,366
87,461,046
977,868
Less accumulated depreciation
(11,142,752)
(27,902,574)
(802,991)
(2,146,835)
(36,568)
(42,031,720)
(187,080)
Total capital assets (net)
10,135,313
21,995,305
177,354
13,055,556
65,798
45,429,326
790,788
TOTAL ASSETS
14,592,578
25,234,645
1,712,465
13,513,707
929,859
55,983,254
2,033,065
DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Deferred pension resources
80,760
100,950
222,091
-
121,141
524,942
-
(continued)
26
Statement of Net Position
Proprietary Funds
December 31, 2016 (Continued)
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts and contracts payable
Accrued interest payable
Other accrued liabilities
Due to other governmental units
Unearned revenue
Bonds and loans payable - current
Compensated absences due within one year
Total current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
Bonds and loans payable - net current portion
Compensated absences payable
Net pension liability
Total noncurrent liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Deferred pension resources
NET POSITION
Net investment in capital assets 10,135,313 17,580,101 177,354 13,055,556 65,798
Unrestricted 4,255,173 2,909,027 964,473 305,914 564,083
TOTAL NET POSITION $ 14,390,486 $ 20,489,128 $ 1,141,827 $ 13,361,470 $ 629,881
Adjustment to reflect the cumulative internal balance for the net effect of the activity
between the internal service funds and the enterprise funds over time
Net position of business -type activities (page 19)
CITY OF MONTICELLO
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
41,014,122 65,788
8,998,670 981,087
50,012,792 $ 1,046,875
53,920
$ 50,066,712
27
Governmental
Business -Type Activities
- Enterprise Funds
Activities -
Deputy
Internal
Water
Sewage
Liquor
Fiber Optics
Registrar
Totals
Service Funds
$ 17,279
$ 122,633
$ 88,093
$ 149,496 $
853
$ 378,354
$ 709
-
5,283
-
-
-
5,283
819
-
-
3,336
-
-
3,336
-
16,405
2,561
56,240
2,741
74,195
152,142
3,950
-
-
-
-
3,950
-
-
289,000
-
-
289,000
120,000
9,118
9,118
16,766
-
7,181
42,183
100,613
46,752
428,595
164,435
152,237
82,229
874,248
222,141
-
4,126,204
-
-
-
4,126,204
605,000
13,829
13,829
17,049
5,483
50,190
159,049
190,971
238,714
525,169
286,456
1,241,310
-
204,800
4,378,747
542,218
-
291,939
5,417,704
764,049
251,552
4,807,342
706,653
152,237
374,168
6,291,952
986,190
31,300
39,125
86,076
-
46,951
203,452
-
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
41,014,122 65,788
8,998,670 981,087
50,012,792 $ 1,046,875
53,920
$ 50,066,712
27
lZCIOF
MontikeHo
(This page left blank intentionally)
28
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position
Proprietary Funds
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Sales and cost of sales
Net sales
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Operating revenues
Charges for services
Other
Total operating revenues
Operating expenses
Personal services
Materials and supplies
Other services and charges
Content and access charges
Depreciation
Total operating expenses
Operating income (loss)
Nonoperating revenues (expenses)
Investment earnings
Interest expense
Gain on sale of capital asset
Total Nonoperating revenes (expenses)
Income (loss) before capital contributions,
special items, and transfers
Capital contributions
Special item - transfer of operations
Transfers in
Transfers out
Change in net position
Net Position, January 1
Net Position, December 31
CITY OF MONTICELLO
29
Governmental
Business -Type Activities
- Enterprise Funds
Activities -
Deputy
Internal
Water
Sewage
Liquor
Fiber Optics
Registrar
Totals
Service Funds
$ 5,448,584
$ 5,448,584
(4,041,224)
(4,041,224)
1,407,360
1,407,360
$ 1,130,260
$ 2,195,310
-
$ 1,692,935 $
561,775
5,580,280
$ 526,285
41,998
27,942
2,046
46,631
1,116
119,733
-
1,172,258
2,223,252
2,046
1,739,566
562,891
5,700,013
526,285
258,066
347,717
571,520
310,161
309,701
1,797,165
33,504
181,393
17,828
26,445
160,835
4,342
390,843
41,101
230,330
1,046,286
197,571
1,210,958
34,889
2,720,034
169,454
-
-
-
389,411
-
389,411
-
502,447
1,142,479
40,512
419,555
3,185
2,108,178
83,907
1,172,236
2,554,310
836,048
2,490,920
352,117
7,405,631
327,966
22
(331,058)
573,358
(751,354)
210,774
(298,258)
198,319
67,959
32,402
12,663
5,783
9,273
128,080
18,502
-
(68,230)
-
-
-
(68,230)
(16,182)
5,218
-
-
-
5,218
-
73,177
(35,828)
12,663
5,783
9,273
65,068
2,320
73,199
(366,886)
586,021
(745,571)
220,047
(233,190)
200,639
187,854
1,812,602
-
-
-
2,000,456
-
-
-
356,900
356,900
350,000
350,000
(199,327)
(770,134)
(350,000)
-
-
(1,319,461)
-
61,726
675,582
236,021
(38,671)
220,047
1,154,705
200,639
14,328,760
19,813,546
905,806
13,400,141
409,834
846,236
$ 14,390,486
$ 20,489,128
$ 1,141,827
$ 13,361,470 $
629,881
$ 1,046,875
Adjustment to reflect the consolidation of internal service fund
related to enterprise
funds
25,938
Change in net position
of business -type activities (page 21)
$ 1,180,643
The notes to the financial statements
are an integral part of
this statement.
29
Statement of Cash Flows
Proprietary Funds
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash received from customers and users
Cash from interfund services provided
Cash paid to suppliers for goods and services
Cash paid to employees
Cash paid to other funds for services provided
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities
Transfers from other funds
Transfers to other funds
Net cash provided (used) by noncapital financing activities
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities
Capital contributions
Acquisition of capital assets
Long-term debt issued
Principal paid on long-term debt
Interest and fiscal charges paid on long-term debt
Net cash provided (used) by capital and related
financing activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest on investments
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1
Cash and cash equivalents, December 31
CITY OF MONTICELLO
(continued)
30
Governmental
Business
-Type Activities - Enterprise
Funds
Activities -
Deputy
Internal
Water
Sewage
Liquor
Fiber Optics
Registrar
Totals
Service Funds
$ 1,198,109
$ 2,256,947
$ 5,450,088
$ 1,613,032
$ 558,669
$ 11,076,845
$ -
-
-
-
-
-
-
526,285
(397,914)
(1,054,939)
(4,202,188)
(1,657,929)
(12,063)
(7,325,033)
(195,696)
(238,850)
(325,569)
(530,193)
(322,670)
(289,191)
(1,706,473)
(13,234)
(12,845)
(14,907)
(26,929)
(23,295)
(91,210)
-
548,111
863,594
702,800
(394,496)
234,120
1,954,129
330,589
-
-
-
350,000
-
350,000
-
(199,327)
(770,134)
(350,000)
-
(1,319,461)
(199,327)
(770,134)
(350,000)
350,000
(969,461)
187,854
1,776,155
-
1,964,009
(975,000)
(2,270,325)
(24,404)
(3,269,729)
(159,041)
1,413,065
1,413,065
(570,830)
(570,830)
(115,000)
(78,002)
(78,002)
(16,259)
(787,146)
270,063
-
-
(24,404)
(541,487)
(290,300)
67,959
32,402
12,663
5,783
9,273
128,080
18,502
(370,403)
395,925
365,463
(38,713)
218,989
571,261
58,791
4,406,268
2,200,605
671,717
341,721
598,017
8,218,328
1,183,486
$ 4,035,865
$ 2,596,530
$ 1,037,180
$ 303,008
$ 817,006
$ 8,789,589
$ 1,242,277
(continued)
30
Statement of Cash Flows
Proprietary Funds
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued)
Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash
provided (used) by operating activities
Operating income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to
net cash provided (used) by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization
(Increase) decrease in assets
Special assessments receivable
Accounts receivable, net
Due from other governmental units
Inventory
Prepaid items
(Increase) decrease in deferred outflows
Deferred pension resources
Increase (decrease) in liabilities
Accounts and contracts payable
Other liabilities
Due to other governmental units
Unearned revenue
Compensated absences
Net pension liability
Increase (decrease) in deferred inflows
Deferred pension resources
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
Schedule of noncash investing, capital and
financing activities:
Net amortization of bond premium (discount)
Disposal of capital assets
CITY OF MONTICELLO
$ - $ (2,985) $ $ - $ $ (2,985) $
$ 34,000 $ - $ $ 78,419 $ $ 112,419 $
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
31
Governmental
Business
-Type Activities - Enterprise
Funds
Activities -
Deputy
Internal
Water
Sewage
Liquor
Fiber Optics
Registrar
Totals
Service Funds
$ 22
$ (331,058)
$ 573,358
$ (751,354)
$ 210,774
$ (298,258)
$ 198,319
502,447
1,142,479
40,512
419,555
3,185
2,108,178
83,907
13,953
(5,420)
-
-
-
8,533
-
14,348
39,115
(1,000)
(120,258)
40,608
(27,187)
-
-
-
(44,830)
(44,830)
71,708
-
71,708
-
(1,733)
(1,147)
(2,198)
13,019
(1,023)
6,918
26,873
(66,711)
(83,389)
(183,456)
-
(100,067)
(433,623)
-
(12,147)
(5,084)
(24,945)
73,077
322
31,223
(12,014)
-
-
458
(6,276)
-
(5,818)
14,455
2,561
3,580
(9,750)
4,574
15,420
(2,450)
-
-
-
(2,450)
-
7,487
7,487
9,073
(12,509)
2,917
14,455
33,504
71,151
88,939
195,665
106,726
462,481
-
7,289
9,111
20,045
10,934
47,379
-
$ 548,111
$ 863,594
$ 702,800
$ (394,496)
$ 234,120
$ 1,954,129
$ 330,589
$ - $ (2,985) $ $ - $ $ (2,985) $
$ 34,000 $ - $ $ 78,419 $ $ 112,419 $
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
31
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The basic financial statements of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the city)
have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles (GAAP) generally
accepted in the United States of America as applied to governmental units, as
applied by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). GASB is
the accepted standard-setting body for establishing governmental accounting
and financial reporting principles. The significant accounting policies of the city
are described as follows:
A. Reportina entitv
The city of Monticello was incorporated 1856 and is under Minnesota Statutes
with a mayor -council form of government. The city falls under section 501(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code. The five -member mayor -council is elected on
staggered, even -numbered years. Councilors are elected at -large to four-year
terms while the mayor is elected to a two-year term. The governing body
appoints an administrator to implement policies and oversee daily operations.
The accompanying financial statements include all funds, departments,
agencies, boards, commissions, and other organizations that comprise the city,
along with any component units.
Component units are legally separate entities for which the city (primary
government) is financially accountable, or for which the exclusion of the
component unit would render the financial statements of the primary
government misleading. The criteria used to determine if the primary
government is financially accountable for a component unit includes whether or
not the primary government appoints the voting majority of the potential
component unit's governing body, is able to impose its will on the potential
component unit, is in a relationship of financial benefit or burden with the
potential component unit, or is fiscally depended upon by the potential
component unit.
The Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) is fiscally dependent
upon the city, and its governing body consists of city council members and other
members appointed by the city council. The city is able to impose its will on the
EDA by significantly influencing the programs, projects, activities, or level of
services performed or provided by the EDA. There is a potential for the EDA to
provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific burdens on, the city.
Therefore, the EDA is included as a component unit of the city. The EDA's
financial data has been blended with that of the city (i.e. reported as though its
funds were funds of the city) and reported as a special revenue fund. Therefore,
the EDA does not issue separate financial statements.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
The mayor and council are responsible for appointing some members of other
organizations. However, the city's accountability for these organizations does
not extend beyond making appointments.
B. Government -wide and fund financial statements
The government -wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position
and the statement of activities) report information on all of the activities of the
primary government and its component unit. For the most part, the effect of
inter -fund activity has been removed from these statements. Governmental
activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental
revenues, are reported separately from business -type activities, which rely to a
significant extent on fees and charges for support.
The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct
expenses of a given function or segment is offset by program revenues. Direct
expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function. Program
revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or
directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function
or segment and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the
operation or capital requirements of a particular function or segment. Taxes and
other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead
as general revenues.
Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds and
proprietary funds. Major individual governmental funds and major individual
enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial
statements.
The city applies restricted resources first when an expense is incurred for which
both restricted and unrestricted resources are available. Depreciation expense
is included in the direct expense of each function. Interest on long-term debt is
considered an indirect expense and is reported separately on the Statement of
Activities.
Aggregated information for the remaining nonmajor funds are reported in single
columns in the respective fund financial statements.
C. Measurement focus, basis of accountina, and financial statement
presentation
The government -wide financial statements are reported using the economic
resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the
proprietary fund financial statements. Revenues are recorded when earned and
32
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of
related cash flows. Property taxes and special assessments, if levied, are
recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar
items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed
by the provider have been met.
Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial
resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting.
Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available.
Revenues are considered available when they are collectible with the current
period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this
purpose, the city considers revenue to be available if they are collected within
60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are
recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However,
debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to claims and
judgments, net pension liabilities, and compensated absences, which are
recognized as expenditures to the extent they have matured. Capital asset
acquisitions are reported as capital outlay expenditures in the governmental
funds. Proceeds from long-term debt are reported as other financing sources.
Property taxes, franchise taxes, licenses, and investment interest associated
with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and
have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. All other revenue
items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received
by the city.
Since governmental fund statements are presented using a measurement focus
and basis of accounting different from that used in the government -wide
statements' governmental column, a reconciliation is presented that briefly
explains the adjustments necessary to reconcile ending net position and the
change in net position.
In the fund financial statements, financial transactions and accounts of the city
are organized on the basis of funds. The operation of each fund is considered
to be an independent fiscal and separate accounting entity, with a self -balancing
set of accounts recording cash and/or other financial resources together with all
related liabilities and residual equities or balances, and changes therein, which
are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining
certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restriction, or
limitations.
Maior Governmental Funds — The major governmental funds reported by the
city are as follows:
CITY OF MONTICELLO
General Fund — The General Fund is used to account for all financial
resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund.
Community Center Fund — The Community Center (special revenue) Fund
accounts for the revenues and expenditures related to the community
center. In addition to a property tax allocation, the community center
generates significant revenue from charges for memberships, program
activities, and space rentals.
Economic Development Authority (EDA) Fund — The EDA (special
revenue) Fund is used to account for revenues and expenditures related
to the blended component unit. Tax increments, generated mainly by
economic and redevelopment districts, are the EDA's primary revenue
source.
Debt Service Fund — The Debt Service Fund is used to account for the
accumulation of resources for and the payment of long-term debt principal,
interest, and related costs.
Capital Projects Fund — The Capital Projects Fund is used to account for
financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major
capital facilities (other than those financed by proprietary funds).
Maior Proprietary Funds — The city reports the following major proprietary funds:
Water Fund — The Water (enterprise) Fund is used to account for all
activities necessary to provide water services to the residents and
businesses of the city.
Sewage Fund — The Sewage (enterprise) Fund is used to account for all
activities necessary to provide sewage services to the residents and
businesses of the city.
Liquor Fund — The Liquor (enterprise) Fund is used to account for the
operations of the city's liquor store.
Fiber Optics Fund — The Fiber Optics (enterprise) Fund is used to account
for all activities necessary to provide fiber optic services to the residents
and businesses of the city.
Deputy Registrar Fund — The Deputy Registrar (enterprise) Fund is used to
account for the operation of city's department of motor vehicles.
33
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Additionally, the city reports the following fund type:
Internal Service Funds — These funds account for the city's information
technology, benefit accrual and central equipment services. Internal service
funds operate in a manner similar to enterprise funds; however, they
provide services primarily to other city departments.
As a general rule, the effect of inter -fund activity has been eliminated from the
government -wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are
charges between the city's enterprise funds and various other functions of the
city. Elimination of these charges would distort the direct costs and program
revenues of the various functions concerned.
Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers or
applicants for goods, services, or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and
contributions, and 3) capital grants and contributions, including special
assessments. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues
rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes
the city has the authority to impose.
Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from non-
operating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from
providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a
proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating
revenues of the city's enterprise and internal service funds are charges to
customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for enterprise and
internal service funds include cost of sales and services, administrative
expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenue and expenses not
meeting this definition are reported as non-operating revenues and expenses.
Aggregated information for the internal service funds is reported in a single
column in the proprietary fund financial statements. Because the principal user
of the internal services is the city's governmental activities, the financial
statements of the internal service funds are consolidated into the governmental
column when presented in the government -wide financial statements. The cost
of these services is reported in the appropriate functional activity.
D. Cash and Investments
Cash and investments include balances from all funds that are combined and
invested to the extent available in savings accounts, certificates of deposit, U.S.
government obligations, and other securities authorized by state statutes.
Earnings from investments are allocated to the respective funds on the basis of
applicable participation by each fund.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the city considers all highly liquid
debt instruments with an original maturity from the time of purchase by the city
of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The proprietary fund's equity in
the government -wide cash and investment management pool is considered to
be cash equivalent.
Investments are generally stated at fair value, except for investments in external
investment pools, which are stated at amortized cost. Short-term highly liquid
debt instruments (including commercial paper, banker's acceptances, and U.S.
treasury and agency obligations) purchased with a remaining maturity of one
year or less are reported at amortized cost. Investment income is accrued at the
balance sheet date.
The city categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy
established by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the
fair value of the asset as follows:
• Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
• Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs
• Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs.
Debt securities classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using
a matrix pricing technique. Matrix pricing is used to value securities based on
the securities' relationship to benchmark quoted prices. See Note 2 for the city's
recurring fair value measurements as of December 31, 2016.
E. Property Taxes
Property tax levies are set by the city council each year, and are certified to
Wright County for collection in the following year. In Minnesota, counties act as
collection agents for all property taxes.
Wright County spreads all levies over taxable property. Such taxes become a
lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the city on that date.
Property taxes may be paid by taxpayers in two equal installments on May 15
and October 15. Wright County provides tax settlements to cities and other
taxing districts several times throughout the year. Taxes which remain unpaid
at December 31 are classified as delinquent taxes receivable and are offset by
deferred inflows of resources in the governmental funds financial statements.
Within the governmental fund financial statements, the city recognizes property
tax revenue when it becomes both measurable and available to finance
expenditures of the current period. The portion of delinquent taxes not collected
34
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
by the city in January is fully offset by deferred inflows of resources because it
is not available to finance current expenditures. Deferred inflows of resources in
governmental activities are susceptible to full accrual on the government -wide
financial statements.
F. Special Assessments
Special assessments are levied against the benefited properties for the
assessable costs of special assessment improvement projects in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes. The city usually adopts assessment rolls when
individual public improvement projects are complete or substantially complete.
The assessments are collectible over a term of years generally consistent with
the term of years of the related bond issue.
Collection of annual installments (including interest) is handled by the county in
the same manner as property taxes. Property owners are allowed to prepay
total future installments without interest or prepayment penalties.
Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the amount attributed to each parcel
is a lien upon that property until full payment is made or the amount is
determined to be excessive by the city council or court action. If special
assessments are allowed to go delinquent, the property is subject to tax forfeited
sale and the first proceeds of that sale (after costs, penalties, and expenses of
sale) are remitted to the city in payment of delinquent special assessments.
Generally, the city will collect the full amount of its special assessments not
adjusted by city council or court action. Pursuant to state statutes, a property
shall be subject to tax forfeit sale after three years of delinquency except for
homesteaded, agricultural or seasonal recreational property, which is subject to
sale after five years.
These assessments are recorded as delinquent (levied, but unremitted) and
deferred (certified, but not yet levied) special assessments receivable, and are
offset by deferred inflows of resources in the governmental fund financial
statements.
Unremitted special assessment amounts collected by Wright County are
recorded as unremitted special assessments.
G. Receivables
Utility and miscellaneous accounts receivable are reported at gross. Since the
city is generally able to certify delinquent amounts to the county for collection as
special assessments, no allowance for uncollectible accounts has been
provided on current receivables.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
The city utilizes an allowance for uncollectible accounts to value its receivables
only in the proprietary Fiber Optics Fund. Account (trade) receivables are carried
at original billing amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables based
on a review of all outstanding amounts on a regular basis. Management
determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by identifying troubled accounts
and by using historical experience applied to an aging of accounts. With
approval from council, trade receivables are written off when deemed
uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously written off are
recorded when received.
A receivable is considered past due if any portion of the receivable balance is
outstanding for more than 30 days. Interest is charged on receivables that are
outstanding for more than 30 days. Accrual of interest is not suspended until a
receivable is determined to be uncollectible. Provisions for bad debts would be
insignificant and none has been made for 2016.
Interest receivable is recorded as revenue in the year the interest is earned and
is available to pay liabilities of the current period. The interest receivable
balance is reported as one amount in the General Fund while all other funds
receive interest revenue distributions in cash.
H. Inventories
The inventories of the proprietary funds are stated at cost on the first -in, first -out
basis. Enterprise fund inventory consists of merchandise held for resale at the
city -owned Hi -Way Liquors store.
I. Prepaid Items
Payments to vendors for services that will benefit future accounting periods are
recorded as prepaid. Prepaid items are accounted for using the consumption
method. Fund balance in an amount equal to the prepaid balance in the related
funds is not available for appropriation.
J. Notes Receivable
Notes receivable consist of loans made by the city to area businesses for
development or redevelopment purposes. The terms and interest rates of the
individual loans vary. Notes receivable are offset by deferred inflows of
resources in the governmental funds.
35
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
K. Land Held for Resale
Land held for resale is recorded in the governmental fund which purchased it at
the lower of cost or market. Fund balances are nonspendable or restricted in an
amount equal to the land's carrying value is reported in the governmental funds
as these assets are not available for appropriation.
L. Capital Assets
Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and infrastructure
assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items) are reported in the
applicable governmental or business -type activities columns in the government -
wide financial statements. Such assets are capitalized at historical cost, or
estimated historical cost for assets where actual historical cost is not available.
Donated assets are recorded as capital assets at their estimated acquisition
value at the date of donation. The city restructured the capitalization policy which
had a single threshold level of $5,000 or more for capitalizing capital assets. The
restructured policy divides each asset into a class with a related threshold as
follows:
Class of Asset Threshold Level
Land $1
Land improvements $50,000
Building/building improvements $20,000
Primary infrastructure and utility $75,000
Secondary infrastructure $25,000
Equipment $10,000
Software and non -tangible $10,000
The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that does not add to the value of
the asset or materially extend asset lives is not capitalized. The city has elected
to fully capitalize the infrastructure capital assets of its governmental activities
regardless of their acquisition date or amount.
Capital assets are recorded in the government -wide and proprietary fund
financial statements, but are not reported in the governmental funds financial
statements. Interest incurred during the construction phase of capital assets for
business -type activities is included as part of the capitalized value of the assets
constructed.
Capital assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over their
estimated useful lives. Since surplus assets are generally sold for an immaterial
CITY OF MONTICELLO
amount when declared as no longer needed for city purposes, no salvage value
is taken into consideration for depreciation purposes. Useful lives vary from 10
to 40 years for infrastructure; 5 to 20 years for vehicles, machinery, and furniture
and equipment; 12 to 40 years for buildings; and 10 to 20 years for
improvements other than buildings. Capital assets not being depreciated include
land and construction in progress.
M. Deferred Outflows of Resources
In addition to assets, the statement of net position and/or balance sheet will
sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This
separate financial statement element represents a consumption of net position
that applies to future periods and so will not be recognized as an outflow of
resources (expense/expenditure) until that time. The city has only one type of
item, which arises under a full accrual basis of accounting, that qualifies for
reporting in this category. Accordingly, the item, deferred pension resources, is
reported only in the statement of net position. This item results from actuarial
calculations and current year pension contributions made subsequent to the
measurement date.
N. Long -Term Liabilities
In the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements, long-term
debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities. Bond premiums
and discounts, if material, are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds
using the straight-line method.
In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond
premiums and discounts during the current period. The face amount of debt
issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt
issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt
issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not
withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service
expenditures.
O. Compensated Absences Payable
City employees earn vacation or paid -time -off (PTO) based upon the number of
completed years of service. The city compensates employees for unused
vacation/PTO upon termination of employment. Some non -PTO employees are
entitled to paid sick leave at various rates for each month of full-time service.
Full-time employees who resign or leave city employment voluntarily and in
good standing, after giving proper notice, shall be compensated for up to 50
days of unused sick leave under the following guidelines:
36
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
For union employees, one-fourth of the unused sick leave times the hourly rate
at the time of giving notice is paid. After five years of non-union employment,
one-fourth of the unused sick leave times the hourly rate at the time of giving
notice is paid.
After 10 years of employment, all employees accrue one-half of the unused sick
leave, times the hourly rate at the time of giving notice.
All compensated absences are accrued when incurred in the government -wide
and proprietary fund financial statements. The liability for governmental funds is
recorded in the internal service Benefit Accrual Fund. Resignations and
retirements of employees reduce the liability in the Benefit Accrual Fund or the
applicable enterprise fund.
P. Pensions
For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows of
resources, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of
the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and additions
to/deductions from PERA's fiduciary net position have been determined on the
same basis as they are reported by PERA except that PERA's fiscal year end
in June 30. For this purpose, plan contributions are recognized as of employer
payroll paid dates and benefit payments and refunds are recognized when due
and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at
fair value.
The PERA has a special funding situation created by a direct aid contribution
made by the state of Minnesota. The direct aid is a result of the merger of the
Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund into the PERA on January 1, 2015.
Q. Deferred Inflows of Resources
In addition to liabilities, the statement of net position and/or balance sheet will
sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This
separate financial statement element represents an acquisition of net position
that applies to future periods and so will not be recognized as an inflow of
resources (revenue) until that time. The city has three types of items that qualify
for reporting in this category. First, unavailable revenue, which arises under both
the full- and modified- accrual bases of accounting, is reported in the statement
of net position and the governmental funds balance sheet. Governmental
activities report unavailable revenue from MSA state aid, and the governmental
funds report unavailable revenue from five sources: property taxes, special
assessments, notes receivable, grants receivable, and MSA state aid. These
amounts are deferred and recognized as an inflow of resources in the period
CITY OF MONTICELLO
the amounts become available. Second, deferred pension resources, which
arises under a full accrual basis of accounting, is reported only in the statement
of net position. These amounts are the result of actuarial calculations involving
net differences between projected and actuarial earnings on plan investments
and changes in proportion, and are deferred and recognized as an inflow of
resources in accordance with actuarial calculations.
R. Net Position
In the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements, net position
represents the difference between assets and deferred outflows of resources,
and liabilities and deferred inflows of resources. Net position is displayed in
three components:
• Net investment in capital assets — Consists of capital assets, net of
accumulated depreciation, reduced by any outstanding debt
attributable to acquire capital assets.
• Restricted net position — Consists of net position restricted when
there are limitations imposed on their use through external restrictions
imposed by creditors, grantors, or laws or regulations of other
governments.
• Unrestricted net position — All other net position that does not meet
the definition of "restricted" or "net investment in capital assets."
S. Fund Balance Classifications
In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in
classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be
spent. These classifications are as follows:
• Nonspendable — Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form,
such as prepaid items, inventory, and other long-term assets.
• Restricted — Consists of amounts related to externally imposed
constraints established by creditors, grantors, or contributors; or
constraints imposed by state statutory provisions.
• Committed — Consists of internally imposed constraints that are
established by resolution by the city council, which is the city's highest
level of decision-making authority. Those committed amounts cannot
be used for any other purpose unless the city council modifies or
rescinds the commitment by resolution.
37
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Assigned – Consists of internally imposed constraints. These
constraints consist of amounts intended to be used by the city for
specific purposes but do not meet the criteria to be classified as
restricted or committed. In governmental funds, assigned amounts
represent intended uses established by the governing body itself or by
an official to which the governing body delegates the authority.
Pursuant to city council resolution, the council, city administrator, or
finance director are authorized to establish assignments of fund
balance.
• Unassigned – The residual classification for the General Fund which
also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the
city's policy to first use restricted resources, then use unrestricted resources as
they are needed. When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are
available for use, it is the city's policy to use resources in the following order: 1)
committed, 2) assigned, and 3) unassigned.
T. Budget
Budgets for the General Fund and major special revenue funds are adopted on
a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Reported budget amounts are as originally adopted or as
amended by city council -approved supplemental appropriations and budget
transfers. No supplemental budget amendments were adopted during the year.
Budget appropriations lapse at year-end. The legal level of budgetary control is
at the department level in the General Fund and at the fund level in the major
special revenue funds.
U. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses/expenditures during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
V. Future Change in Accounting Standards
In June 2015 GASB issued Statement No. 74, Financial Reporting for
Postemployment Benefits Plans other than Pension Plans, and Statement No.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits other than
Pensions. Both statements replace the requirements of GASB Statements
related to postemployment benefits other than pensions (OPEB).
Statement No. 74 is intended to make the OPEB accounting and financial
reporting consistent with the pension standards outlined in Statement No.
67. It applies to OPEB plans, and parallels Statement No. 67 and replaces
Statement No. 43. This statement is effective for the city's fiscal year ending
December 31, 2017.
Statement No. 75 is intended to make OPEB accounting and financial
reporting consistent with the pension standards outlined in Statement No.
68. This will include recognizing a net OPEB liability in accrual basis
financial statements. It applies to government employers who provide
OPEB plans to their employees. It parallels Statement No. 68 and replaces
Statement No. 45. This statement is effective for the city's fiscal year ending
December 31, 2018.
In January 2016 GASB issued Statement No. 80, Blending Requirements for
Certain Component Units – An Amendment of GASB Statement No. 14. The
objective of this Statement is to improve financial reporting by clarifying the
financial statement presentation requirements for certain component units. This
Statement amends the blending requirements established in paragraph 53 of
Statement No. 14, The Financial Reporting Entity, as amended and the blending
requirements for the financial statement presentation of component units of all
state and local governments. The additional criterion requires blending of a
component unit incorporated as a not-for-profit corporation in which the primary
government is the sole corporate member. The additional criterion does not
apply to component units included in the financial reporting entity pursuant to
the provisions of Statement No. 39, Determining Whether Certain Organizations
Are Component Units. The requirements of this Statement are effective for
reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016.
In March 2016 GASB issued Statement No. 81, Irrevocable Split -Interest
Agreements. The objective of this Statement is to improve accounting and
financial reporting for irrevocable split -interest agreements by providing
recognition and measurement guidance for situations in which a government is
a beneficiary of the agreement. Split -interest agreements are a type of giving
agreement used by donors to provide resources to two or more beneficiaries,
including governments. Split -interest agreements can be created through
trusts—or other legally enforceable agreements with characteristics that are
equivalent to split -interest agreements—in which a donor transfers resources to
an intermediary to hold and administer for the benefit of a government and at
least one other beneficiary. Examples of these types of agreements include
38
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
charitable lead trusts, charitable remainder trusts, and life -interests in real
estate. This Statement requires that a government that receives resources
pursuant to an irrevocable split -interest agreement recognize assets, liabilities,
and deferred inflows of resources at the inception of the agreement.
Furthermore, this Statement requires that a government recognize assets
representing its beneficial interests in irrevocable split -interest agreements that
are administered by a third party, if the government controls the present service
capacity of the beneficial interests. This Statement requires that a government
recognize revenue when the resources become applicable to the reporting
period. The requirements of this Statement are effective for financial statements
for periods beginning after December 15, 2016.
In March 2016 GASB issued Statement No. 82, Pension Issues — An
Amendment of GASB Statements No. 67, No. 68, and No. 73. The objective of
this Statement is to address certain issues that have been raised with respect
to Statements No. 67, Financial Reporting for Pension Plans, No. 68,
Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions, and No. 73, Accounting and
Financial Reporting for Pensions and Related Assets That Are Not within the
Scope of GASB Statement 68, and Amendments to Certain Provisions of GASB
Statements 67 and 68. Specifically, this Statement addresses issues regarding
(1) the presentation of payroll -related measures in required supplementary
information, (2) the selection of assumptions and the treatment of deviations
from the guidance in an Actuarial Standard of Practice for financial reporting
purposes, and (3) the classification of payments made by employers to satisfy
employee (plan member) contribution requirements.
In November 2016 GASB issued Statement No. 83, Certain Asset Retirement
Obligations. This Statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for
certain asset retirement obligations (AROs). An ARO is a legally enforceable
liability associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset. A government
that has legal obligations to perform future asset retirement activities related to
its tangible capital assets should recognize a liability based on the guidance in
this Statement. This Statement establishes criteria for determining the timing
and pattern of recognition of a liability and a corresponding deferred outflow of
resources for AROs. This Statement requires that recognition occur when the
liability is both incurred and reasonably estimable. The determination of when
the liability is incurred should be based on the occurrence of external laws,
regulations, contracts, or court judgments, together with the occurrence of an
internal event that obligates a government to perform asset retirement activities.
Laws and regulations may require governments to take specific actions to retire
certain tangible capital assets at the end of the useful lives of those capital
assets, such as decommissioning nuclear reactors and dismantling and
removing sewage treatment plants. Other obligations to retire tangible capital
assets may arise from contracts or court judgments. Internal obligating events
CITY OF MONTICELLO
include the occurrence of contamination, placing into operation a tangible capital
asset that is required to be retired, abandoning a tangible capital asset before it
is placed into operation, or acquiring a tangible capital asset that has an existing
ARO. The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods
beginning after June 15, 2018.
NOTE 2. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND INVESTMENTS
A. Components of Cash and Investments
Cash and investments at year-end consist of the following:
Deposits
Investments
Cash on hand
$ 12,531,994
25,174,288
7,540
Total cash and investments — Statement of Net Position $ 37,713,822
B. Deposits
In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the city maintains deposits
at depository banks authorized by the city council, including checking accounts
and non-negotiable certificates of deposit.
The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits.
Custodial Credit Risk — In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the
event of a bank failure, the city's deposits may be lost.
Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit
insurance, corporate surety bond, or collateral. The fair value of collateral
pledged must equal 110 percent of the deposits not covered by federal
deposit insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes
treasury bills, notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies;
general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated "AX or
better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home
Loan Bank; and certificates of deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that
securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted
account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an account at a trust department
of a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned or
controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral. The city's
investment policy does not provide further requirements regarding custodial
credit risk.
39
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
At year-end, the carrying amount of the city's deposits was $12,531,994
while the balance on bank records was $12,919,690. All deposits were
covered by federal depository insurance, surety bonds, or by collateral held
by the city's agent in the city's name.
C. Cash on hand
Cash on hand consists of cash in the possession of the city, including petty cash
and change funds.
D. Investments
Custodial Credit Risk — For investments, this is the risk that in the event
of a failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a
broker-dealer) the city would not be able to recover the value of its
investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside
party. The city's investment policy does not provide additional requirements
beyond state statutes, but the city typically limits its exposure by purchasing
insured or registered investments, or by the control of who holds the
securities.
Credit Risk — This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an
investment will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the city's
investments to direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United
States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under
the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit
rating, are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical
rating agency, and all of the investments have a final maturity of 13 months
or less; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated
"AX or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency rated "A" or better; bankers' acceptances of United States banks
eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper
issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated
of the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating
agencies, and maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment
Contracts guaranteed by a United States commercial bank, domestic
CITY OF MONTICELLO
branch of a foreign bank, or a United States insurance company, and with
a credit quality in one of the top two highest categories; repurchase or
reverse purchase agreements and securities lending agreements with
financial institutions qualified as a "depository" by the government entity,
with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with
capitalization exceeding $10,000,000; that are a primary reporting dealer in
U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; or
certain Minnesota securities broker-dealers. The city's investment policy
does not further address credit risk.
Concentration Risk — This is the risk associated with investing a significant
portion of the city's investment (5 percent or more) in the securities of a
single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as treasuries),
investment pools, and mutual funds. The city's investment policy requires
that no more than 5 percent of the overall portfolio may be invested in the
securities of a single issuer, except for the securities of the U.S. government
and in agencies or an external investment pool. More than 5 percent of the
city's investments are invested with the Federal Home Loan Bank. These
investments are 7.5 percent of the city's total investments.
Interest Rate Risk — This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value
of fixed rate investments resulting from changes in interest rates (the longer
the period for which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The city's
investment policy does not further address the duration of investments.
The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) is a common-law trust
organized in accordance with the Minnesota Joint Powers Act, which invests
only in investment instruments allowable under Minnesota Statutes. It is an
external investment pool regulated by Minnesota statutes and the Board of
Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. The 4M Fund is not registered with
the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), but it follows the same regulatory
rules of the SEC. The city's investment in the 4M Fund is measured at the net
asset value per share provided by the pool, which is based on an amortized cost
method that approximates fair value.
40
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The following schedule provides information on credit and interest rate risks by investment type for the city's investments
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Percent of
Holdings
1.8%
2.9%
7.5%
1.6%
41.1%
8.6%
3.9%
1.4%
5.2%
5.0%
1.2%
19.7%
100.0%
41
Credit Risk
Interest Risk
— Maturity Duration in Years
Fair Value
Measurements
No
Less
More
Investment Type
Rating
Agency
Using
Maturity
Than 1
1 to 5
5 to 10
Than 10
Total
U.S. agency securities
Federal Farm Credit Bank
AA+
S&P
Level 1
$
$
$
$ 456,696
$ -
$ 456,696
Federal Agriculture Mortgage
Corporation
AA+
S&P
Level
-
734,667
734,667
Federal Home Loan Bank
AA+
S&P
Level 1
250,143
807,392
840,397
1,897,932
Federal National Mortgage
Association
AA+
S&P
Level
198,614
195,594
-
394,208
Negotiable certificates of deposit
N/R
N/A
Level 1
4,667,699
4,750,977
937,780
-
10,356,456
Local government securities
AAA
S&P
Level 1
-
-
-
2,169,285
2,169,285
Local government securities
AA+
S&P
Level 1
-
568,502
423,472
991,974
Local government securities
AA
S&P
Level 1
357,396
-
-
357,396
Local government securities
Aaa
Moody's
Level 1
-
-
1,299,582
1,299,582
Local government securities
Aa1
Moody's
Level 1
140,920
1,108,125
1,249,045
Local government securities
A2
Moody's
Level 1
299,712
-
299,712
4M Fund
N/R
N/A
Level 1
4,967,335
-
-
4,967,335
Total investments
$4,967,335
$5,025,095
$5,768,236
$2,838,094
$6,575,528
$25,174,288
N/A — Not Applicable
N/R — Not Rated
Percent of
Holdings
1.8%
2.9%
7.5%
1.6%
41.1%
8.6%
3.9%
1.4%
5.2%
5.0%
1.2%
19.7%
100.0%
41
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
CITY OF MONTICELLO
NOTE 3. CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital asset activities for the year end December 31,
2016 are as
follows:
January 1,
Transfers and
December 31,
Beginning
Completed
Ending
Internal Service
Governmental
Internal Service Governmental
Balance
Additions
Deletions
Construction
Balance
Fund Assets
Funds Total
Fund Additions Fund Additions
Governmental activities
Nondepreciable capital assets:
Land
$ 8,555,369
$ 1,017,795
$
-
$ -
$ 9,573,164
$
$ 9,573,164
$ $ 1,017,795
Construction in progress
1,264,456
5,096,211
(6,858)
(3,077,625)
3,276,184
3,276,184
5,096,211
Total capital assets, not depreciated
9,819,825
6,114,006
(6,858)
(3,077,625)
12,849,348
12,849,348
6,114,006
Depreciable capital assets:
Buildings and systems
92,636,026
-
-
3,077,625
95,713,651
95,713,651
-
Machinery and equipment
5,425,323
138,236
(44,566)
-
5,518,993
977,868
4,541,125
138,236
Total capital assets, depreciated
98,061,349
138,236
(44,566)
3,077,625
101,232,644
977,868
100,254,776
138,236
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Buildings and systems
(45,502,235)
(3,871,298)
-
-
(49,373,533)
-
(49,373,533)
- (3,871,298)
Machinery and equipment
(3,881,718)
(233,374)
44,566
(4,070,526)
(187,080)
(3,883,446)
(83,907) (149,467)
Total accumulated depreciation
(49,383,953)
(4,104,672)
44,566
(53,444,059)
(187,080)
(53,256,979)
(83,907) (4,020,765)
Net capital assets, depreciated
48,677,396
(3,966,436)
-
3,077,625
47,788,585
790,788
46,997,797
54,329 (4,020,765)
Total governmental activities
$58,497,221
$ 2,147,570
$
(6,858)
$ -
$60,637,933
$ 790,788
$59,847,145
$ 54,329 $ 2,093,241
Business -type activities
Nondepreciable capital assets:
Land
$ 1,197,945
$ -
$
$
$ 1,197,945
Construction in progress
1,491,882
2,191,196
3,683,078
Total capital assets, not depreciated
2,689,827
2,191,196
4,881,023
Depreciable capital assets:
Buildings and systems
79,100,343
999,404
80,099,747
Machinery and equipment
2,543,832
48,863
(112,419)
2,480,276
Total capital assets, depreciated
81,644,175
1,048,267
(112,419)
82,580,023
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Buildings and systems
(38,418,330)
(1,989,182)
-
(40,407,512)
Machinery and equipment
(1,617,631)
(118,996)
112,419
(1,624,208)
Total accumulated depreciation
(40,035,961)
(2,108,178)
112,419
(42,031,720)
Net capital assets, depreciated
41,608,214
(1,059,911)
-
40,548,303
Total business -type activities
$44,298,041
$ 1,131,285
$
-
$
$45,429,326
42
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2016 was charged to
WWTPDewaterlmprovements
function/programs as follows:
WWTF Phosphorus Reduction/Digester
Governmental activities
2016 Street Reconstruction
General government $
39,365
Public safety
71,520
Public works
3,394,372
Recreation and culture
515,508
Capital assets held by the City's internal service funds —
charged to the various functions based on usage of assets
83,907
Total depreciation expense — governmental activities $
4,104,672
Business -type activities
Water $ 502,447
Sewer 1,142,479
Liquor 40,512
Fiber Optics 419,555
Deputy registrar 3,185
Total depreciation expense — business -type activities $ 2,108,178
NOTE 4. COMMITMENTS
During fiscal 2016, the city awarded contracts for various construction and
remodeling projects. The city's commitments for uncompleted work on these
contracts at December 31, 2016 are approximately as follows:
Fund Project Description
Sewage
WWTPDewaterlmprovements
Sewage
WWTF Phosphorus Reduction/Digester
Capital projects
2016 Street Reconstruction
Capital projects
TH 25/7th St Intersection Improvments
Nonmajor
61,037
governmental
BCOL Interim Park Improvements
NOTE 5. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
A. Description
Contract
Amount
$ 141,975
2,723,671
3,890,673
1,200,588
220,507
200,430 20,078
CITY OF MONTICELLO
and net pension liability.
• General Obligation Bonds — Three of the four outstanding general
obligation bond issues financed street improvement projects and
construction at the wastewater treatment plant. The fourth issue
financed a settlement with telecommunication revenue bondholders
and capital equipment purchases in the Central Equipment Fund.
• General Obligation Certificates of Indebtedness — The city issues
general obligation certificates of indebtedness to provide financing for
capital equipment. Debt service is covered by general property taxes.
General obligation certificates of indebtedness are direct obligations
that pledge the full faith and credit of the city.
• Special Assessment Bonds — These bonds are payable primarily
from special assessments levied on the properties benefiting from the
improvements funded by these issues. Any deficiencies in revenue to
fund these issues will be provided from general property taxes.
• General Obligation Revenue Bonds — The outstanding general
obligation revenue bonds both financed improvements to the city's
sewer system. They will be repaid from revenues pledged and are
backed by the taxing power of the city. Net operating revenues were
$2,223,252 and principal and interest payments were $547,921 for a
percentage of revenues of 24.65%.
• PFA Loan — This loan was issued for improvements to the wastewater
treatment plant and is payable primarily from user fees which benefit
from the improvements.
• Compensated Absences — The city provides vacation and sick leave
benefits to certain eligible employees. The liability will be repaid by the
Benefit Accrual fund or respective enterprise fund for which each
employee is employed.
$8,177,414 $6,166,982 $2,010,433 Net OPEB Obligation — The city provides post -employment benefits
to certain eligible employees through the city's OPEB Plan. The liability
will be repaid based on a pay-as-you-go financing requirement as well
as any additional amounts determined annually by the city. The liability
will be repaid by the General Fund.
The city has the following types of long-term liabilities outstanding at December
31, 2016: general obligation (G.O.) bonds and certificates of indebtedness, special
assessment improvement bonds, Public Facilities Authority (PFA) loans,
compensated absences, net other post -employment benefits (OPEB) obligation,
• Net Pension Liability — The city contributes to the Minnesota PERA
defined benefit retirement fund per Minnesota state statute. The liability
is a reflection of the City's portion of the total net pension liability of the
PERA plan based on a percentage of contributions into the plan.
43
Amount
Paid
Remaining
To -Date
12/31/2016
$ 99,383
$ 42,593
2,662,634
61,037
3,204,535
686,138
-
1,200,588
200,430 20,078
CITY OF MONTICELLO
and net pension liability.
• General Obligation Bonds — Three of the four outstanding general
obligation bond issues financed street improvement projects and
construction at the wastewater treatment plant. The fourth issue
financed a settlement with telecommunication revenue bondholders
and capital equipment purchases in the Central Equipment Fund.
• General Obligation Certificates of Indebtedness — The city issues
general obligation certificates of indebtedness to provide financing for
capital equipment. Debt service is covered by general property taxes.
General obligation certificates of indebtedness are direct obligations
that pledge the full faith and credit of the city.
• Special Assessment Bonds — These bonds are payable primarily
from special assessments levied on the properties benefiting from the
improvements funded by these issues. Any deficiencies in revenue to
fund these issues will be provided from general property taxes.
• General Obligation Revenue Bonds — The outstanding general
obligation revenue bonds both financed improvements to the city's
sewer system. They will be repaid from revenues pledged and are
backed by the taxing power of the city. Net operating revenues were
$2,223,252 and principal and interest payments were $547,921 for a
percentage of revenues of 24.65%.
• PFA Loan — This loan was issued for improvements to the wastewater
treatment plant and is payable primarily from user fees which benefit
from the improvements.
• Compensated Absences — The city provides vacation and sick leave
benefits to certain eligible employees. The liability will be repaid by the
Benefit Accrual fund or respective enterprise fund for which each
employee is employed.
$8,177,414 $6,166,982 $2,010,433 Net OPEB Obligation — The city provides post -employment benefits
to certain eligible employees through the city's OPEB Plan. The liability
will be repaid based on a pay-as-you-go financing requirement as well
as any additional amounts determined annually by the city. The liability
will be repaid by the General Fund.
The city has the following types of long-term liabilities outstanding at December
31, 2016: general obligation (G.O.) bonds and certificates of indebtedness, special
assessment improvement bonds, Public Facilities Authority (PFA) loans,
compensated absences, net other post -employment benefits (OPEB) obligation,
• Net Pension Liability — The city contributes to the Minnesota PERA
defined benefit retirement fund per Minnesota state statute. The liability
is a reflection of the City's portion of the total net pension liability of the
PERA plan based on a percentage of contributions into the plan.
43
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Long-term liabilities at year-end are summarized as follows:
B. Changes in Long -Term Liabilities
Final
Original
Interest
Maturity
Balance -
Issue
Rate %
Issue Date
Date
End of Year
January 1,
December 31,
Due Within
Governmental activities
2016
Additions
Retirements
2016
One Year
General obligation bonds
2008B Sewer revenue
Governmental activities
refunding bonds
$9,270,000
3.00%
04/17/2008
08/01/2018
$ 1,496,000
General obligation bonds
$ 9,563,000
$
$(1,877,000)
$ 7,686,000
$1,901,000
2014A General
obligation bonds:
Certificate of indebtedness
325,000
(60,000)
265,000
65,000
judgment portion
6,080,000
1.00-3.50
12/18/2014
12/15/2030
5,730,000
Special assessment bonds
11,689,653
4,900,000
(3,859,653)
12,730,000
2,075,000
equipment portion
515,000
1.00-3.05
12/18/2014
12/15/2024
460,000
Add premiums on bonds
215,931
-
(35,633)
180,298
-
Less discounts on bonds
(25,735)
-
4,703
(21,032)
-
Other general obligation debt
Compensated absences
226,158
233,598
(200,094)
259,662
100,613
2013A Certificate
Net OPEB obligation
305,563
36,672
(16,191)
326,044
-
of indebtedness
500,000
0.35-2.10
04/26/2013
12/01/2020
265,000
Net pension liability
Special assessments bonds
GERF
1,887,162
2,130,162
(484,366)
3,532,958
2007 Improvement bonds
5,137,903
4.00
12/27/2007
02/01/2018
525,000
2010A General obligation
Total governmental activities
$24,186,732
$ 7,300,432
$ (6,528,234)
$24,958,930
$ 4,141,613
refunding and
improvement bonds
3,255,000
0.40-2.70
09/14/2010
02/01/2021
1,420,000
Business -type activities
2011A General obligation
General obligation
refunding bonds
10,735,000
2.00-3.00
10/19/2011
02/01/2023
3,425,000
revenue bonds
$ 2,930,347
$ -
$ (470,347)
$ 2,460,000
$ 180,000
2015B General
PFA loans
615,268
1,413,065
(100,483)
1,927,850
109,000
obligation bonds
2,605,000
1.50-3.00
11/05/2015
12/15/2030
2,460,000
Add premiums on bonds
31,213
-
(3,859)
27,354
-
2016A General
Less discounts on bonds
(874)
-
874
-
-
obligation bonds
4,900,000
2.00-3.00
11/21/2016
12/15/2030
4,900,000
Compensated absences
77,919
86,771
(72,317)
92,373
42,183
Net premiums
Net pension liability
(discounts) on bonds
159,266
GERF
1,108,334
632,663
(499,687)
1,241,310
-
Compensated absences payable
259,662
Total business -type activities
$ 4,762,207
$2,132,499
$ (1,145,819)
$ 5,748,887
$ 331,183
Net OPEB obligation
326,044
Net pension liability
3,532,958
Total governmental activities
$24,958,930
Business -type activities
General obligation revenue bonds
2013B Wastewater
treatment bonds
3,000,000
2.00 - 3.35
12/05/2013
12/01/2028
$ 2,460,000
Public Facility Authority
loan (2015A)
2,391,483
1.06
09/23/2015
08/20/2035
1,927,850
Net premiums
(discounts) on bonds
27,354
Compensated absences payable
92,373
Net pension liability
1,241,310
Total business -type activities
$ 5,748,887
44
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
C. Minimum Debt Payments
Minimum annual principal and interest payments to maturity for bonds payable are as follows
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Business -Type Activities
General Obligation Bonds
PFA Loan
Principal
Governmental Activities
Principal
Interest
$ 180,000 $
63,398
$ 109,000
General Obligation
Special
59,798
Year Ending
General Obligation Bonds
Certificate of Indebtedness
Assessment Bonds
December 31,
Principal
Interest
Principal Interest
Principal
Interest
2017
$ 1,901,000
$ 197,253
$ 65,000 $ 4,590
$ 2,075,000 $
280,088
2018
410,000
166,759
65,000 3,713
1,590,000
231,074
2019
415,000
160,609
65,000 2,673
1,265,000
203,005
2020
420,000
152,931
70,000 1,470
1,290,000
177,303
2021
435,000
143,691
- -
1,320,000
148,475
2022-2026
2,220,000
533,741
3,460,000
349,475
2027-2031
1,885,000
166,938
1,730,000
124,925
2032-2035
-
-
-
-
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Business -Type Activities
General Obligation Bonds
PFA Loan
Principal
Interest
Principal
Interest
$ 180,000 $
63,398
$ 109,000
$ 12,177
185,000
59,798
111,000
23,195
185,000
56,098
112,000
22,015
190,000
52,398
113,000
20,824
195,000
48,598
114,000
19,623
1,055,000
169,235
589,000
79,661
470,000
23,440
622,000
47,665
-
-
157,850
13,915
$ 7,686,000 $1,521,922 $ 265,000 $ 12,446 $ 12,730,000 $1,514,345 $2,460,000 $ 472,963 $1,927,850 $ 239,074
D. Conduit Debt F. Abatements
The city has issued Senior Housing Refunding Revenue Bonds to provide financial The City currently has four agreements that would be considered tax
assistance to private sector entities for the acquisition and construction of senior abatements under GASB Statement 77:
housing facilities deemed to be in the public interest. The bonds are secured by
the property financed and are payable solely from payments received on the
underlying mortgage loans. Upon repayment of the bonds, ownership of the
acquired facilities transfers to the private sector entity served by the bond
issuance. The City is not obligated in any manner for repayment of the bonds.
Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial
statements. As of December 31, 2016, there was one series of Senior Housing
Refunding Revenue Bonds outstanding. The original issue amounts totaled
$3,000,000 with an interest rate of 4.75 percent. This balance has been reduced
through annual payments and partial call prepayments. The outstanding balance
as of December 31, 2016 is undetermined.
E. Pay -As -You -Go Tax Increment Note
The City, in order to spur economic development and redevelopment has entered
into private development and redevelopment agreements to encourage
developers to construct, expand, or improve new or existing properties and
buildings or clean-up and redevelop blighted areas. These agreements may in
substance be a tax abatement but will depend on their individual circumstances.
Name
Purpose
1-20
Outstanding
Prairie
22 twinhome and 8 fourplex
West
Townhouse housing units
1-22
Redevelopment activities in
Downtown
1997 Downtown and 2010
District
Embracing Downtown plans
1-24 St.
60 unit elderly (senior
Benedicts
citizen) housing facility
1-29 Front
Porch
27 townhouse housing units;
Assoc
owner -occupied
Amount of
taxes
Outstanding
abated
principal Date of
during the
balance at required
fiscal year
year end decertification
$ 6,333 $ 77,890 12/31/2024
$ 48,751 $ 684,816 12/31/2024
$ 20,520 $ - 12/31/2026
$ 16,969 $ 164,650 12/31/2029
45
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The City is authorized to create a tax increment financing plan under Minnesota
Statute 469.175. The criteria that must be met under the statute are that, in the
opinion of the municipality:
• the proposed development or redevelopment would not reasonably be
expected to occur solely through private investment within the
reasonably foreseeable future; and
• the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected
to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than
the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed
development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax
increments for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the plan.
The requirements of this item do not apply if the district is a housing
district;
• that the tax increment financing plan conforms to the general plan for the
development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole; and
• that the tax increment financing plan will afford maximum opportunity,
consistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole, for the
development or redevelopment of the project by private enterprise.
The city has development agreements with private developers for a property in
the city's tax increment districts. As part of the agreements, the city has agreed to
reimburse the developers for certain costs through pay-as-you-go tax increment
notes.
These notes provide for the payment of principal equal to the developers' costs,
plus interest at rates ranging from 5.0 percent to 8.5 percent (interest accrual
commencing upon the developer completing the project). Payments of the notes
will be made at the lesser of the scheduled note payments or the actual net tax
increment received during the period specified in the agreement. The note will be
canceled at the end of the agreement term, whether it has been fully repaid or not.
The outstanding principal balances as of December 31, 2016 are listed in the
previous table. These notes are not included in the city's long-term debt, because
repayment is required only to the extent sufficient tax increments are received.
The city's position is that this is an obligation to assign future and uncertain
revenue sources and is not actual debt in substance.
G. Arbitrage Rebate
In accordance with the provisions of Section 148(f) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, bonds must satisfy certain arbitrage rebate requirements.
Positive arbitrage is the excess of (1) the amount earned on investments
purchased with bond proceeds over (2) the amount that such investments would
CITY OF MONTICELLO
have earned had such investments been invested at a rate equal to the yield on
the bond issue. In order to comply with the arbitrage rebates requirements,
positive arbitrage must be paid to the U.S. treasury at the end of each five-year
anniversary date of the bond issue. As of December 31, 2016, there are no
amounts of arbitrage rebates.
H. Revenue Pledged
Future revenue pledged for the payment of long-term debt is as follows:
2013B G.O.
Wastewater
Description
Treatment Bonds
PFA Loan
Use of proceeds
Sewage Fund
Sewage Fund
Revenue pledged
Type
Utilitycharges
Utilitycharges
Percent of total debt service
57%
43%
Term of pledge
2013-2028
2013-2025
Remaining principal & interest
$ 2,932,963
$ 2,166,924
Current year
Principal and interest paid
$ 246,998
$ 100,483
Pledged revenue received
$ 1,260,306
$ 935,004
NOTE 6. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS — STATE-WIDE
A. Plan Description
The city participates in the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) cost-
sharing multiple -employer defined benefit pension plan administered by the
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA's
defined benefit pension plans are established and administered in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356. PERA's defined benefit
pension plans are tax qualified plans under Section 401 (a) of the Internal
Revenue Code.
General Emolovees Retirement Fund (GERF)
All full-time and certain part-time employees of the city are covered by the
General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF). GERF members belong to either
the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are
covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. The Basic Plan
was closed to new members in 1967. All new members must participate in the
Coordinated Plan.
46
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
B. Benefits Provided
PERA provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are
established by state statute and can only be modified by the state legislature.
Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. Increases are
related to the funding ratio of the plan. Members in plans that are at least 90%
funded for two consecutive years are given 2.5% increases. Members in plans
that have not exceeded 90% funded, or have fallen below 80%, are given 1%
increases.
The benefit provisions stated in the following paragraph of this section are current
provisions and apply to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees
who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the
provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service.
GERF Benefits
Benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any five successive
years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two
methods are used to compute benefits for PERA's Coordinated and Basic Plan
members. The retiring member receives the higher of a step -rate benefit accrual
formula (Method 1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the
annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member is 2.2% of average salary for each
of the first ten years of service and 2.7% for each remaining year. The annuity
accrual rate for a Coordinated Plan member is 1.2% of average salary for each of
the first ten years and 1.7% for each remaining year. Under Method 2, the annuity
accrual rate is 2.7% of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7% for
Coordinated Plan members for each year of service. For members hired prior to
July 1, 1989, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90
and normal retirement age is 65. For members hired on or after July 1, 1989,
normal retirement age is the age for unreduced Social Security benefits capped at
66.
C. Contributions
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee
contributions. Contribution rates can only be modified by the state legislature.
GERF Contributions
Basic Plan and Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 9.1% and
6.50%, respectively, of their annual covered salary in calendar year 2016.The
city was required to contribute 11.78% of pay for Basic Plan members and 7.50%
for Coordinated Plan members in calendar year 2016. The city's contributions to
the GERF for the year ended December 31, 2016, were $267,516. The city's
contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
D. Pension Costs
GERF Pension Costs
At December 31, 2016, the city reported a liability of $4,774,268 for its
proportionate share of the GERF's net pension liability. The city's net pension
liability reflected a reduction due to the State of Minnesota's contribution of $6
million to the fund in 2016. The State of Minnesota is considered a non -
employer contributing entity and the state's contribution meets the definition of
a special funding situation. The State of Minnesota's proportionate share of the
net pension liability associated with the city totaled $62,387. The net pension
liability was measured as of June 30, 2016, and the total pension liability used
to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as
of that date. The city's proportion of the net pension liability was based on the
city's contributions received by PERA during the measurement period for
employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, relative
to the total employer contributions received from all of PERA's participating
employers. At June 30, 2016, the city's proportion share was 0.0588% which
was an increase of 0.0010% from its proportion measured as of June 30, 2015.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the city recognized pension expense
of $293,219 for its proportionate share of the GERF's pension expense. In
addition, the city recognized an additional $18,602 as pension expense (and
grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the State of Minnesota's
contribution of $6 million to the General Employees Fund.
At December 31, 2016, the city reported its proportionate share of the GERF's
deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to
pensions from the following sources:
Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows
47
of Resources
of Resources
Differences between expected and
actual economic experience
$ -
$ 386,097
Changes in actuarial assumptions
1,035,342
-
Difference between projected and
actual investment earnings
814,208
290,719
Changes in proportion
38,869
105,694
Contributions paid to PERAsubsequent
to the measurement date
130,590
-
Total
$ 2,019,009
$ 782,510
47
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
$130,590 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting
from contributions paid to PERA subsequent to the measurement date will be
recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December
31, 2017. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources
related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
$ 1,105,909
E. Actuarial Assumptions
The total pension liability in the June 30, 2016, actuarial valuation was determined
using the following actuarial assumptions:
Inflation 2.50% per year
Active Member Payroll Growth 3.25% per year
Investment Rate of Return 7.50%
Salary increases were based on a service -related table. Mortality rates for active
members, retirees, survivors and disabilitants were based on RP 2014 tables for
males or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments. Cost of living benefit
increases for retirees are assumed to be 1 % per year for all future years.
Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2016, valuation were based on the
results of actuarial experience studies. The most recent four-year experience
study in the GERF was completed in 2015.
The following changes in actuarial assumptions occurred in 2016:
• The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from
1.0% per year through 2035 and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per
year for all future years.
• The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The
single discount rate was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
• Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study
dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll
growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to 3.25% for payroll
growth and 2.50% for inflation.
The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of PERA,
prepares an analysis of the reasonableness on a regular basis of the long-term
expected rate of return on a regular basis using a building-block method in which
best -estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each
major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce an expected long-
term rate of return by weighting the expected future rates of return by the target
asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of
arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the
following table:
Long -Term
Target Expected Real
Asset Class Allocation Rate of Return
Domestic Stocks
Pension
Yearended
Expense
December 31,
Amount
2017
$ 288,092
2018
172,585
2019
472,768
2020
172,464
$ 1,105,909
E. Actuarial Assumptions
The total pension liability in the June 30, 2016, actuarial valuation was determined
using the following actuarial assumptions:
Inflation 2.50% per year
Active Member Payroll Growth 3.25% per year
Investment Rate of Return 7.50%
Salary increases were based on a service -related table. Mortality rates for active
members, retirees, survivors and disabilitants were based on RP 2014 tables for
males or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments. Cost of living benefit
increases for retirees are assumed to be 1 % per year for all future years.
Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2016, valuation were based on the
results of actuarial experience studies. The most recent four-year experience
study in the GERF was completed in 2015.
The following changes in actuarial assumptions occurred in 2016:
• The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from
1.0% per year through 2035 and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per
year for all future years.
• The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The
single discount rate was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
• Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study
dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll
growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to 3.25% for payroll
growth and 2.50% for inflation.
The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of PERA,
prepares an analysis of the reasonableness on a regular basis of the long-term
expected rate of return on a regular basis using a building-block method in which
best -estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each
major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce an expected long-
term rate of return by weighting the expected future rates of return by the target
asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of
arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the
following table:
Long -Term
Target Expected Real
Asset Class Allocation Rate of Return
Domestic Stocks
45%
5.50%
International Stocks
15%
6.00%
Bonds
18%
1.45%
Alternative Assets
20%
6.40%
Cash
2%
0.50%
Total 100%
F. Discount Rate
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.5%, a
reduction from the 7.9% used in 2015. The projection of cash flows used to
determine the discount rate assumed that employee and employer contributions
will be made at the rates set in Minnesota statute. Based on these assumptions,
the fiduciary net position of the GERF was projected to be available to make all
projected future benefit payments of current plan members. Therefore, the long-
term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all
periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability.
G. Pension Liability Sensitivity
The following presents the city's proportionate share of the net pension liability
calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well
48
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
as what the city's proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were
calculated using a discount rate 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point
higher than the current discount rate:
1 % Decrease 1% Increase
In Discount Discount In Discount
Rate (6.50%) Rate (7.50%) Rate (8.50%)
Citys proportionate
share of the GERF
net pension liability $ 6,780,876 $ 4,774,268 $ 3,121,370
H. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position
Detailed information about the GERF pension plan's fiduciary net position is
available in a separately -issued PERA financial report that includes financial
statements and required supplementary information. That report may be obtained
on the Internet at www.mnpera.org.
NOTE 7. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION PLANS — STATE-WIDE
Three Council members of the city are covered by the Public Employees Defined
Contribution Plan (PEDCP), a multiple -employer deferred compensation plan
administered by PERA. The PEDCP is a tax qualified plan under Section 401(a)
of the Internal Revenue Code and all contributions by or on behalf of employees
are tax deferred until time of withdrawal.
Plan benefits depend solely on amounts contributed to the plan plus investment
earnings, less administrative expenses. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353D.03,
specifies plan provisions, including the employee and employer contribution rates
for those qualified personnel who elect to participate. An eligible elected official
who decides to participate contributes 5% of salary which is matched by the
elected official's employer. Employer and employee contributions are combined
and used to purchase shares in one or more of the seven accounts of the
Minnesota Supplemental Investment Fund. For administering the plan, PERA
receives 2% of employer contributions and twenty-five hundredths of 1 percent
(0.0025) of the assets in each member's account annually.
Total contributions made by the city during fiscal year 2016 were:
Contribution Amount % of Covered Payroll Required
Employee Employer Employee Employer Rate
$ 1,140 $ 1,140 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
CITY OF MONTICELLO
NOTE 8. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN - MONTICELLO FIRE
RELIEF ASSOCIATION
A. Plan Description
All members of the Monticello Fire Department (the Department) are covered
by a defined benefit contribution plan administered by the Monticello Fire Relief
Association (the Association). As of December 31, 2016, the plan covered 29
active firefighters and 3 retirees and beneficiaries. The plan is a single -employer
retirement plan that is established and administered in accordance with
Minnesota statute, chapter 69.
The Association maintains a separate Special fund to accumulate assets to fund
the retirement benefits earned by the Department's membership. Funding for
the Association is derived from contributions from the city and 2% fire aid from
the State of Minnesota. Funds are also derived from investment income.
B. Benefits Provided
Upon approval by the Board of Trustees, lump sum retirement benefits are either
paid or deferred as follows:
Each member who is at least 50 years of age, has retired from the fire
department, has served at least 10 years of active service with such
department before retirement and has been a member of the Association in
good standing at least 10 years prior to such retirement, shall be entitled to
a lump sum service pension in the amount of $3,600 for each year of service
but not exceeding the maximum amount per year of service allowed by law
for the minimum average amount of available financing per firefighter as
prescribed by laws. A year of service may be prorated to twelve monthly
slices, if a full year of active service is not reached.
If a member of the Association shall become permanently or totally disabled,
the Association shall pay the sum of $3,600 for each year the member was
an active member of the Association. If a member who received a disability
pension subsequently recovers and returns to active duty, the disability
pension is deducted from the service pension as approved by the Board of
Trustees.
According to the bylaws of the Association and pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, members who retire with less than 20 years of service and have
reached the age of 50 years and have completed at least 10 years of active
membership are entitled to a reduced service pension not to exceed the
amount calculated by multiplying the member's service pension for the
completed years of service times an applicable nonforfeitable percentage.
49
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
During the time a member is on deferred vested pension (not yet reached age
50), they will earn interest on the deferred benefit amount at a rate equal to
the actual time weighted total rate of return as reported by the Minnesota State
Auditor's Office, up to five percent, compounded annually. A deferred vested
member will not be eligible for disability benefits.
C. Contributions
Minnesota statutes, chapters 424 and 424A authorize pension benefits for
volunteer fire relief associations. Contributions by the city are determined as
follows:
• Normal cost for next year (increase in pension benefit obligation)
• Plus estimated expenses for next year and 10 percent of any deficits
• Less anticipated income next year and 10 percent of any surplus
The plan is funded by fire state aid, investment earnings and, if necessary,
employer contributions as specified in Minnesota statutes and voluntary City
contributions (if applicable). The State of Minnesota contributed $123,656 in fire
state aid to the plan on behalf of the City Fire Department for the year ended
December 31, 2016, which was recorded as a revenue. Required employer
contributions are calculated annually based on statutory provisions. The City's
statutorily -required contributions to the plan for the year ended December 31,
2016 were $123,656. The City's contributions were equal to the required
contributions as set by state statute. The City made no voluntary contributions to
the plan. Furthermore, the firefighter has no obligation to contribute to the plan.
D. Pension Costs
At December 31, 2016, the city reported a net pension asset of $23,180 for the
FRA plan. The total pension liability used to calculate the net pension asset in
accordance with GASB 68 was determined by Robinson Associates LLC applying
an actuarial formula to specific census data certified by the fire department as of
December 31, 2016.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fire Department recognized pension
expense of $179,441.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
At December 31, 2016, the fire department reported deferred outflows/inflows
of resources:
Deferred
Deferred
Outflows
Inflows
of Resources
of Resources
Differences between expected and
6,029
actual economic experience $ -
$ 49,068
Net difference between projected
(6,180)
and actual investment earnings $ 28,267
$ -
$ 28,267
$ 49,068
Amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to
pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Pension
Year ended
Expense
December 31,
Amount
2017
$ 6,029
2018
6,029
2019
6,033
2020
(6,180)
2021
(4,089)
Thereafter
(28,623)
$ (20, 801)
E. Actuarial Assumptions
The total pension liability at December 31, 2016, was determined using the entry
age normal actuarial cost method and the following assumptions:
Retirement eligibility at 100 percent service pension at age 50 and 20 years of
service, early vested retirement at age 50 with 10 years of service vested at 60
percent and increased by 4 percent for each additional year of service up to 20
and eligibility for deferred service pension payable at age 50 and 20 years of
service.
50
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Salary Increases 2.00% per year
G. Changes in the Net Pension Liability
Cost of living increases 2.00% per year
Investment rate of return 4.19%
Total Plan Net Pension
Pension Fiduciary Liability
20 year municipal bond yield 3.57%
Liability (TPL) Net Position (Asset)
(a) (b) (a -b)
There were no changes in actuarial assumptions in 2016.
Beginning balance 12/31/15 $ 1,017,135 $ 1,026,460 $ (9,325)
The 4.19 percent long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments
was determined using a building-block method in which best estimates for
changes for the year
expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of inflation) were
Interest cost 79,730 79,730
developed for each asset class using the plan's target investment allocation
Interest total pension liability 44,225 44,225
along with long-term return expectations by asset class. Inflation expectations
Change inn TPL due to changes in
were applied to derive the nominal rate of return for the portfolio.
benefit terms 90,761 90,761
Differences between actual and expected
experience in measurement of TPL (53,157) - (53,157)
The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each
Contributions from employer 123,656 (123,656)
major asset class are summarized in the following table:
Supplemental benefits reimbursed -
Net investment income 55,902 (55,902)
Long-term
Benefit payments (1,168) (1,168) -
Target Expected Real
Administrative expenses - (4,144) 4,144
Asset Class Allocation Rate of Return
Ending balance 12/31/16 $ 1,177,526 $ 1,200,706 $ (23,180)
Cash 6.5% -0.7%
Mutual funds 93.5% 3.8%
H. Pension Asset Sensitivity
The following presents the city's net pension (liability) asset for the FRA plan,
100.0%
calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well
as what the city's net pension (liability) asset would be if it were calculated using
F. Discount Rate
a discount rate 1 percent lower or 1 percent higher than the current discount
rate:
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 4.19 percent.
The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that
1% Decrease 1% Increase
contributions to the FRA plan will be made as specified in statute. Based on that
In Discount Discount In Discount
assumption and considering the funding ratio of the plan, the fiduciary net position
Rate (3.19%) Rate (4.19%) Rate (5.19%)
was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of
Net Pension
current active and inactive members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of
return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit
Asset (Liability) $ (10,355) $ 23,180 $ 55,183
payments to determine the total pension liability.
I. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position
The Association issues a publicly available financial report that includes
financial statements and required supplementary information. A copy of the
report may be obtained at Monticello City Hall.
51
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
NOTE 9. OTHER POST -EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) PLAN
A. Plan Description
The city provides post -employment insurance benefits to certain eligible
employees through the city's OPEB Plan, a single -employer defined benefit plan
administered by the city. All post -employment benefits are based on contractual
agreements with employee groups. The Retiree Health Plan does not issue a
publicly available financial report. These contractual agreements do not include
any specific contribution or funding requirements. These benefits are summarized
as follows:
Post -Employment Insurance Benefits — All retirees of the city have the
option under state law to continue their medical insurance coverage through
the city from the time of retirement until the employee reaches the age of
eligibility for Medicare. For members of all employee groups, the retiree must
pay the full premium to continue coverage for medical and dental insurance.
The city is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health
insurance coverage in the same insurance pool as its active employees,
whether the premiums are paid by the city or the retiree. Consequently,
participating retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known as
an "implicit rate subsidy." This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree
is receiving a more favorable premium rate than they would otherwise be able
to obtain if purchasing insurance on their own, due to being included in the
same pool with the city's younger and statistically healthier active employees.
B. Funding Policy
The required contribution is based on projected pay-as-you-go financing
requirements, with additional amounts to pre -fund benefits as determined annually
by the city.
C. Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation
The city's annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on the ARC of the city,
an amount determined on an actuarially determined basis in accordance with the
parameters of GASB Statement Nos. 43 and 45. The ARC represents a level
funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal costs each
year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a
period not to exceed 30 years. The following table shows the components of the
city's annual OPEB cost for the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan,
and the changes in the city's net OPEB obligation to the plan:
CITY OF MONTICELLO
ARC
$ 42,120
Interest on net OPEB obligation
12,223
Adjustment to ARC
(17,671)
Annual OPEB cost (expense)
36,672
Less contribution made
16,191
Increase in net OPEB obligation
20,481
Net OPEB obligation — beginning of year
305,563
Net OPEB obligation — end of year $ 326,044
The city's annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed
to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation for the last three years are as follows:
Fiscal Year
Beginning
Annual
Percentage
Beginning
OPEB
OPEB
Employer
of AnnualOPEB
Net OPEB
January 1,
Obligation
Cost
Contribution
Cost Contributed
Obligation
2014
$ 255,604
$ 34,718
$ 6,761
19.5%
$ 283,561
2015
283,561
35,817
13,815
38.6%
305,563
2016
305,563
36,672
16,191
44.2%
326,044
D. Funded Status and Funding Progress
As of January 1, 2014, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the plan was
zero percent funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $265,486
and the actuarial value of assets was $0, resulting in an unfunded actuarial
accrued liability (UAAL) of $265,486. The covered payroll (annual payroll of
active employees covered by the plan) was $3,914,601, and the ratio of the
UAAL to the covered payroll was 6.78 percent.
Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported
amounts and assumptions about the probability occurrence of events far into
the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality,
and the healthcare cost trend.
Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and ARC of the
employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with
past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The Schedule
of Funding Progress immediately following the notes to basic financial
statements presents multi-year trend information about whether the actuarial
value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial
accrued liabilities for benefits. The city's net OPEB obligation is typically
liquidated using the General fund.
52
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
E. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions
Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the
substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and the plan members)
and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the
historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and plan
members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include
techniques that are designed to reduce the effects of short-term volatility in
actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the
long-term perspective of the calculations.
In the January 1, 2014 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost
method was used. The actuarial assumptions included: a 4.0 percent investment
rate of return (net of administrative expenses) based on the city's own
investments; an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 10.0 percent initially, reduced
by decrements to an ultimate rate of 5.0 percent after 10 years for medical
insurance. The assumptions used did not include OPEB inflation increases. The
city has chosen to amortize the entire UAAL as a level dollar amount over a 30
year open period. This method will re -amortize the UAAL each year over 30 years.
Absent actuarial gains, the UAAL will never be fully recognized under this method.
NOTE 10. RISK MANAGEMENT AND LITIGATION
The city is exposed to various risks of losses related to torts; theft of, damage to,
and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural
disasters. For the past several years, the city has obtained insurance coverage
from various trusts administered by the League of Minnesota Cities. Additionally,
the city has effectively managed risk through various employee education and
prevention programs.
All risk management activities are accounted for in the appropriate fund.
Expenditures and claims are recognized when it is probable that a loss has
occurred, the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, and the loss
amount exceeds insurance coverage. In determining claims, events that might
create claims, but for which none have been reported, are considered.
The city attorney estimates that the amount of actual or potential claims against
the city as of December 31, 2016 will not materially affect the financial condition
of the city.
Workers compensation coverage is provided through the League of Minnesota
Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). This is a group self-insured workers'
compensation plan. Nearly every municipality in Minnesota participates in the
plan. The city has never had to contribute any additional funds beyond the annual
CITY OF MONTICELLO
standard premium and deductibles, which is $2,500 per occurrence. The city's
annual premium reflects a base rate multiplied by an experience modification of
69%.
The city provides health benefit coverage to all full-time employees and certain
part-time employees who meet personnel policy set criteria. The city pays a
portion of the premium, which is set annually by council action, and is not
obligated to make any other payments.
The city also purchases property, vehicle, liability and various other insurance
coverages from the LMCIT. The standard deductible for most claims is $1,000.
State statute sets tort limits for most liability claims at $500,000 per individual
and $1,500,000 for all claimants for one incident. Annually, the council can
waive the tort limits, but has chosen not to without exception. The city
periodically receives a dividend from LMCIT and has never had to contribute
additional funds beyond premiums and deductibles.
There were no significant reductions in insurance coverages from the previous
year and there were no settlements in excess of insurance coverage in each of
the past three years.
NOTE 11. CLAIMS AND JUDGMENTS
The city participates in a number of federal and state programs that are fully or
partially funded by grants received from other governmental units. Expenditures
financed by grants are subject to audit by the appropriate grantor government.
If expenditures are disallowed due to noncompliance with grant program
regulations, the city may be required to reimburse the grantor government.
As of December 31, 2016, significant amounts of grant expenditures have not
been audited by the granting agency, but the city believes that disallowed
expenditures discovered in subsequent audits, if any, will not have a material
effect on any of the individual funds or the overall financial position of the city.
NOTE 12. SPECIAL ITEM — TRANSFER OF OPERATIONS
During 2016, the city contracted management of FiberNet Monticello to Arvig
Enterprises. As part of this transfer, employees of FiberNet Monticello became
employees of Arvig Enterprises. The positive impact of this transfer of
operations on the city's long-term liabilities has been reported as a special
item in the city's Statement of Activities and the proprietary funds' Statement of
Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position.
53
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
NOTE 13. FUND BALANCES
Classifications
At December 31, 2016, a summary of the city's governmental fund balance classifications are as follows
CITY OF MONTICELLO
54
Special Revenue Funds
Economic
Debt
General
Community
Development
Service
Capital
Nonmajor
Fund
Center
Authority
Fund
Projects
Funds
Total
Nonspendable
Prepaid items
$ 134,245
$ 24,907
$ 1,638
$ -
$ -
$ 1,239
$ 162,029
Land held for resale
-
-
2,030,757
-
1,631,789
-
3,662,546
Total nonspendable
134,245
24,907
2,032,395
-
1,631,789
1,239
3,824,575
Restricted
Debt service
-
-
-
3,543,551
-
-
3,543,551
Economic development
-
-
1,413,910
-
-
1,138,527
2,552,437
Perpetual care
-
-
-
-
-
30,489
30,489
Tax increment
-
-
860,757
-
-
-
860,757
Total restricted
-
-
2,274,667
3,543,551
-
1,169,016
6,987,234
Assigned
Capital improvements
-
-
-
-
5,252,440
4,496,088
9,748,528
Economic development
-
-
2,835,268
-
-
-
2,835,268
Community center operations
-
736,922
-
-
-
-
736,922
Total assigned
-
736,922
2,835,268
-
5,252,440
4,496,088
13,320,718
Unassigned
6,142,475
-
-
-
-
-
6,142,475
Total
$ 6,276,720
$ 761,829
$ 7,142,330
$ 3,543,551
$ 6,884,229
$ 5,666,343
$ 30,275,002
54
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
NOTE 14. INTERFUND TRANSFERS
Interfund transfers for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of the
following:
Governmental funds:
Economic Development Authority
Debt Service
Capital Projects
Nonmajor governmental
Total governmental funds
Enterprise funds:
Water
Sewage
Liquor
Fiber Optics
Total enterprise funds
Total
Transfers In Transfers Out
1,439,136
753,500
2,192,636
350,000
350,000
$ 2,542,636
The following schedule reflects each fund transfer
$ 188,500
753,500
281,175
1,223,175
199,327
770,134
350,000
1,319,461
$ 2,542,636
Transfers In
Transfers Out
Amount
Debt Service
Economic Development Authority
188,500
(1)
Water
199,327
(1)
Sewage
770,134
(1)
Nonmajor governmental
281,175
(1)
Nonmajor governmental
Capital Projects
753,500
(2)
Fiber Optics
Liquor
350,000
(3)
Total
$2,542,636
(1) Transfer for principal and interest payments on various debt issues.
(2) Transfer for land acquisition and park development.
(3) Transfer to subsidize fund operating and capital expenditures.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
NOTE 15. CONCENTRATION OF REVENUES
Cargill Kitchen solutions is the largest customer of water and sewage services.
The company's water purchases account for $78,763, or 6.7 percent, of Water
Fund operating revenue; and the company's sewage charges account for
$410,130, or 18.4 percent, of Sewage Fund operating revenue. Additionally,
Northern States Power Company's (Xcel Energy) net tax capacity for property
taxes payable in 2016 is $15,913,229, or 59.9 percent, of the total net capacity
of $26,581,226. Accordingly, Xcel Energy's share of the $9.205 million city
property tax levy is $5.65 million. The tax capacity on January 1, 2017, is based
on market values certified to the state on January 1, 2016. In both 2013 and
2014, Xcel Energy uprated energy producing assets at its Monticello nuclear
plant, increasing the company's net tax capacity to $16,970,092, or 60 percent,
of the $28,307,628 total tax capacity for taxes payable in 2017.
NOTE 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In 2016, the city council approved the early pay off of the remaining $1,006,000
2008B Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds on February 1, 2017. These bonds
had original maturity dates of August 1, 2017 and February 1, 2018. Existing
reserves in the debt service fund were used to prepay the bonds.
On February 14, 2017, the city purchased 5.701 acres of land from St. Henry's
Catholic Church for $969,941 to be used as part of the Fallon Overpass Bridge
project. The construction phase of the project is estimated for 2018.
ionii� ello
55
IZCITY OF
MMontic110
(This page left blank intentionally)
56
j v�-�-. r•. r . _ — _y _ ��
Adow-
- .mss•=. ..� ���'_��
- _ _ter
Azi
- IRE SUPP ENRY INE RMA - -
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Required Supplementary Information
Schedules of Employer's Share and Non -Employer Proportionate Share
of Net Pension Liability
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Public Employees Retirement Association - General Employees Retirement Fund
Employer's
Proportionate Share
(Amount) of the Net
Pension Liability
(Asset)
(a)
($9,325)
(23,180)
Employer's Covered
Payroll'
(b)
N/A
N/A
Employer's
Proportionate Share
of the Net Pension
Liability as a
Percentage of its
Covered Payroll
(a/b)
N/A
N/A
Plan Fiduciary Net Position
as a Percentage of the
Total Pension Liability
100.9%
102.0%
Note 1: Changes in Plan Provisions. On January 1, 2015, the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged into the GERF, which increased the total pension
liability by $1.1 billsion and increased the fiduciary plan net position by $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and employer contributions were revised.
Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions. (1) 2015 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increse rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2030 and
2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (2) 2016 Changes - The assumed post-retirement
benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. The
assumed investment return and the single discount rate were both changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the
experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for
payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation.
Note 3: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend
information. Additional years will be added as they become available.
Note 4: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages."
Note 5: The Monticello Volunteer Firemen's Relief Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore there are no payroll expenditures (i.e. there are no covered payroll
percentage calculations).
57
Employer's
(2)
Fiscal
(Percentage) of
Year Ending
the Net Pension
Employer's
Liability
Employer's Proportionate
100.0%
2016
Plan Fiduciary Net
(1)
Proportion
Employer's
Share of the State of
Employer's Proportionate
Position as a
PERA Fiscal
(Percentage) of
Proportionate Share
Minnesota's
Share of the Net Pension
Percentage of the
Year Ending
the Net Pension
(Amount) of the Net
Proportionate Share of
Employer's Covered
Liability as a Percentage of
Total Pension
June 30,
Liability
Pension Liability
the Net Pension Liability
Payroll
its Covered Payroll
Liability
2015
0.0578%
$2,995,496
$0
$3,395,756
88.21%
78.2%
2016
0.0588%
4,774,268
62,387
3,651,024
130.77%
68.9%
Monticello
Fire Department Relief Association
Employer's
Proportionate Share
(Amount) of the Net
Pension Liability
(Asset)
(a)
($9,325)
(23,180)
Employer's Covered
Payroll'
(b)
N/A
N/A
Employer's
Proportionate Share
of the Net Pension
Liability as a
Percentage of its
Covered Payroll
(a/b)
N/A
N/A
Plan Fiduciary Net Position
as a Percentage of the
Total Pension Liability
100.9%
102.0%
Note 1: Changes in Plan Provisions. On January 1, 2015, the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged into the GERF, which increased the total pension
liability by $1.1 billsion and increased the fiduciary plan net position by $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and employer contributions were revised.
Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions. (1) 2015 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increse rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2030 and
2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (2) 2016 Changes - The assumed post-retirement
benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. The
assumed investment return and the single discount rate were both changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the
experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for
payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation.
Note 3: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend
information. Additional years will be added as they become available.
Note 4: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages."
Note 5: The Monticello Volunteer Firemen's Relief Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore there are no payroll expenditures (i.e. there are no covered payroll
percentage calculations).
57
Employer's
Proportion
Fiscal
(Percentage) of
Year Ending
the Net Pension
December 31,
Liability
2015
100.0%
2016
100.0%
Employer's
Proportionate Share
(Amount) of the Net
Pension Liability
(Asset)
(a)
($9,325)
(23,180)
Employer's Covered
Payroll'
(b)
N/A
N/A
Employer's
Proportionate Share
of the Net Pension
Liability as a
Percentage of its
Covered Payroll
(a/b)
N/A
N/A
Plan Fiduciary Net Position
as a Percentage of the
Total Pension Liability
100.9%
102.0%
Note 1: Changes in Plan Provisions. On January 1, 2015, the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged into the GERF, which increased the total pension
liability by $1.1 billsion and increased the fiduciary plan net position by $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and employer contributions were revised.
Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions. (1) 2015 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increse rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2030 and
2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (2) 2016 Changes - The assumed post-retirement
benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. The
assumed investment return and the single discount rate were both changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the
experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for
payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation.
Note 3: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend
information. Additional years will be added as they become available.
Note 4: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages."
Note 5: The Monticello Volunteer Firemen's Relief Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore there are no payroll expenditures (i.e. there are no covered payroll
percentage calculations).
57
Required Supplementary Information
Schedules of Employer's Pension Contributions
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year Ending
December 31,
2015
2016
Fiscal Year Ending
December 31,
2014
2015
2016
Public Employees Retirement Association - General Employees Retirement Fund
Contributions in
Relation to the
Statutorily Required Statutorily Required Contribution Deficiency Employer's Covered
Contributions Contributions (Excess) Payroll
(a) (b) (a -b) (c)
$ 266,042 $ 266,042 $ $ 3,547,217
267,516 267,516 3,566,884
Monticello Fire Department Relief Association
Statutorily Determined Actual Contributions
Contributions Paid
(a) (b)
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Contributions as a
Percentage of Covered
Payroll
(b/c)
7.5%
7.5%
$ 108,186 $ 108,186 $
120,027 120,027
123,656 123,656
Contribution
Deficiency (Excess)
(a -b)
Note 1: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages."
Note 2: The Monticello Volunteer Firemen's Relief Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore there are no payroll expenditures (i.e. there are no covered payroll
percentage calculations).
58
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Required Supplementary Information
Schedule of Changes in the Fire Relief Association's Net Pension
Liability (Asset) and Related Ratios
2015 2016
Total pension liability
Service cost $ 77,343 $ 79,730
Interest 41,888 44,224
Changes in benefit terms 90,761
Experience gain/(loss) (53,156)
Benefit payments, including refund of member contributions (128,101) (1,168)
Net change in total pension liability (8,870) 160,391
Total pension liability - beginning 1,026,005 1,017,135
Total pension liability - ending (A) 1,017,135 1,177,526
Plan fiduciary net position
Contributions - State $
122,027
$ 123,656
Contributions - Municipal
-
-
Net investment income
(17,673)
55,902
Benefit payments, including refund of member contributions
(128,101)
(1,168)
Administrative expenses
(3,532)
(4,144)
Net change in plan fiduciary net position
(27,279)
174,246
Plan fiduciary net position - beginning
1,053,739
1,026,460
Plan fiduciary net position - ending (B)
1,026,460
1,200,706
Net pension liability (asset) - ending (A) -(B)
(9,325)
(23,180)
Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability
100.9%
102.0%
Covered payroll'
N/A
N/A
Net pension liability as a percentage of covered payroll'
N/A
N/A
Notes to Schedule:
This schedule is built prospectively until it contains ten years of data.
'The Association is comprised of volunteers, therefore, there are no payroll expenditures (i.e., there are no covered payroll percentage calculations)
59
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Required Supplementary Information
Schedule of Funding Progress
City of Monticello Other Post -Employment Benefits Plan
Unfunded
Unfunded
Actuarial
Actuarial Actuarial
Actuarial
Liability as a
Valuation Date
Accrued Value of
Accrued
Funded Covered
Percentage
January 1,
Liability Plan Assets
Liability
Ratio Payroll
of Payroll
2008
$ 302,787 $
$ 302,787
% $ 3,080,457
9.83%
2011
362,290
362,290
3,108,685
11.65
2014
265,486
265,486
3,914,601
6.78
IZCITY OF
MMontic110
(This page left blank intentionally)
61
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Budget and Actual - General Fund
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
(continued)
62
Orginal and Final
Variance with
Budget
Actual
Final Budget
Revenues
Property taxes
$ 6,196,500
$ 6,204,429
$ 7,929
Franchise taxes
264,400
263,900
(500)
Special assessments
300
242
(58)
Licenses and permits
338,900
668,602
329,702
Intergovernmental
300,477
389,005
88,528
Charges for services
268,364
351,702
83,338
Fines and forfeitures
42,100
30,656
(11,444)
Investment earnings
100,000
99,237
(763)
Other revenues
84,959
263,783
178,824
Total revenues
7,596,000
8,271,556
675,556
Expenditures:
Current
General government
Mayor and council
53,925
57,507
3,582
City administration
320,099
320,450
351
City clerk
42,864
66,031
23,167
Finance
428,980
393,754
(35,226)
Audit
45,000
39,273
(5,727)
City assessing
52,115
50,415
(1,700)
Legal
37,000
29,152
(7,848)
Human resources
118,688
116,522
(2,166)
Planning and zoning
218,023
210,173
(7,850)
Information technology services
11,540
692
(10,848)
City hall
215,244
197,006
(18,238)
Prairie center building
14,120
8,917
(5,203)
Public safety
Law enforcement
1,222,627
1,212,080
(10,547)
Fire and rescue
333,823
289,010
(44,813)
Fire relief
80,000
123,656
43,656
Building inspections
369,663
350,304
(19,359)
Civil defense
3,930
1,234
(2,696)
Animal control
51,348
46,943
(4,405)
National Guard
16,050
13,550
(2,500)
(continued)
62
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Budget and Actual - General Fund
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued)
63
Orginal and Final
Variance with
Budget
Actual
Final Budget
Expenditures (continued)
Public works
Public works administration
$ 194,771
$ 126,327
$ (68,444)
Engineering
160,058
111,795
(48,263)
Public works inspecitons
88,809
62,100
(26,709)
Streets and alleys
976,962
806,098
(170,864)
Ice and snow removal
284,280
264,232
(20,048)
Shop and garage
204,101
171,079
(33,022)
Stormwater
73,121
29,277
(43,844)
Street lighting
263,900
231,976
(31,924)
Sanitation
Refuse and recycling collection
614,437
600,300
(14,137)
Transit
Bus service
40,000
41,250
1,250
Recreation and culture
Community celebrations
2,500
5,684
3,184
Senior center
101,672
99,124
(2,548)
Park operations
824,997
775,738
(49,259)
Park ballfields
27,300
20,538
(6,762)
Shade tree
63,527
75,802
12,275
Library
40,526
44,823
4,297
Total expenditures
7,596,000
6,992,812
(603,188)
Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures
-
1,278,744
1,278,744
Other financing sources
Sale of capital assets
11,180
11,180
Net change in fund balance
-
1,289,924
1,289,924
Fund balance at beginning of year
4,986,796
4,986,796
-
Fund balance at end of year
$ 4,986,796
$ 6,276,720
$ 1,289,924
63
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Budget and Actual - Community Center Fund
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
64
Orginal and Final
Variance with
Budget
Actual
Final Budget
Revenues
Property taxes
$ 364,000
$ 364,000
$ -
Charges for services
1,391,110
1,395,573
4,463
Investment earnings
-
14,986
14,986
Other revenues
24,216
12,273
(11,943)
Total revenues
1,779,326
1,786,832
7,506
Expenditures
Current
Recreation and culture
Community center operations
1,647,026
1,447,512
(199,514)
Community center programming
132,300
206,933
74,633
Total expenditures
1,779,326
1,654,445
(124,881)
Net change in fund balance
-
132,387
132,387
Fund balance at beginning of year
629,442
629,442
-
Fund balance at end of year
$ 629,442
$ 761,829
$ 132,387
64
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Budget and Actual - Economic Development Authority Fund
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Revenues
Property taxes
Tax increments
Investment earnings
Other revenues
Total revenues
Expenditures
Current
Economic development
General operations
Land held for resale adjustment
Developmental activities
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures
Other financing uses
Transfers out
Net change in fund balance
Fund balance at beginning of year
Fund balance at end of year
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Orginal and Final
171,171
Variance with
Budget
Actual
Final Budget
$ 280,000
$ 279,422
$ (578)
675,994
668,352
(7,642)
65,000
60,528
(4,472)
1,750
290,409
288,659
1,022,744
1,298,711
275,967
305,050
171,171
(133,879)
-
96,100
96,100
358,893
263,475
(95,418)
663,943
530,746
(133,197)
358,801
767,965
409,164
(200,000)
(188, 500)
11,500
158,801
579,465
420,664
6,562,865
6,562,865
-
$ 6,721,666
$ 7,142,330
$ 420,664
65
Notes to the Required Supplementary Information
December 31, 2016
Budgetary Information
The city follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in
the basic financial statements:
A. Prior to September 1, the city administrator submits to the city council a
proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following
January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the
means of financing them. The city council adopts the proposed budget
as amended and adjusted by the city council and certifies the proposed
property tax levy to the county auditor according to Minnesota Statutes.
B. Public hearings are conducted at the city council's chambers in the
Monticello Community Center.
C. On or before December 28, the final budget is legally enacted by city
council resolution and the final property tax levy is certified to the county
auditor.
D. Management is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts between
departments within a fund; however, any revisions that alter the total
expenditures of any fund must be approved by the city council.
E. The city has legally adopted budgets for the General Fund and all special
revenue funds. Expenditures may not legally exceed budgeted
appropriations at the total fund level. Monitoring of budgets is maintained
at the department level. All amounts over budget have been approved by
the city council through the disbursement process. The city is not legally
required to adopt an annual budget for the nonmajor special revenue
funds, the Debt Service Fund, and the Capital Projects Funds. Project -
length financial plans are adopted for the Debt Service and Capital
Projects Funds.
F. Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Budgeted amounts
are as originally adopted or amended by the city council. All annual
appropriations lapse at year-end.
CITY OF
Monticello
CITY OF MONTICELLO
v�ZAul
41
Adam— OTC I
NA
1©-NMAJ R GC VEA W-ENTA U - s,
- L -
-iow
_ -
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS are used to account for revenue derived from specific taxes or other earmarked revenue sources (other than for major
capital projects) that are restricted by law or administrative action to expenditures for specified purposes.
Minnesota Investment Fund - Established to account for the administration of loans to local businesses while following state and federal guidelines.
Cemetery Fund — Established to account for the activities of cemetery operations. The city maintains two cemeteries: Riverside and Hillside.
CDBG Revitalization Fund — Established to account for funding and activities for the CDBG Revitalization Grant.
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS are used to account for resources used for the acquisition and construction of capital assets by the city, except for
those financed by proprietary funds.
Storm SewerAccess Fund — This fund was established to account for fees collected from building permits for new construction and lot development.
The fees will finance major improvements to the city's storm sewer system.
City Street Reconstruction Fund— This fund was established to account for annual improvements to the city's infrastructure based on a reconstruction
schedule.
Street Lighting Improvement Fund — This fund was established to account for activities incorporating street lighting into designated areas throughout
the city. A portion of the city's electric franchise fee is the main revenue source for this fund.
Park and Pathway Dedication Fund — This fund was established to account for restricted fees collected from developers for park land acquisition
and for park and pathway improvements. The fund also accumulates resources from other sources used for the same purposes.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Combining Balance Sheet
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
December 31, 2016
67
Special Revenue Funds
Capital Project Funds
City Street
Street
Park &
Minnesota
CDBG -
Storm Sewer
Recon-
Lighting
Pathway
Investment
Cemetery
Revitalization
Access
struction
Improvement
Dedication
Total
ASSETS
Cash and investments
$ 1,138,164
$ 31,039
$
363
$ 1,397,396
$ 1,758,513
$ 631,554
$ 632,138
$ 5,589,167
Receivables
Due from other governmental units
-
-
-
-
-
87,764
-
87,764
Prepaid items
1,239
-
-
1,239
Notes receivable
-
-
116,779
-
-
-
-
116,779
Total assets
$ 1,138,164
$ 32,278
$
117,142
$ 1,397,396
$ 1,758,513
$ 719,318
$ 632,138
$ 5,794,949
LIABILITIES
Accounts and contracts payable
$ -
$ 550
$
-
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 11,277
$ 11,827
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Unavailable revenue - notes receivable
-
116,779
-
116,779
FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable
-
1,239
-
1,239
Restricted for economic development
1,138,164
-
363
1,138,527
Restricted for perpetual care
-
30,489
-
30,489
Assigned for capital improvements
-
-
-
1,397,396
1,758,513
719,318
620,861
4,496,088
Total fund balances
1,138,164
31,728
363
1,397,396
1,758,513
719,318
620,861
5,666,343
Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources, and fund balances
$ 1,138,164
$ 32,278
$
117,142
$ 1,397,396
$ 1,758,513
$ 719,318
$ 632,138
$ 5,794,949
67
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Revenues:
Franchise taxes
Charges for services
Investment earnings
Other revenues
Total revenues
Expenditures:
Current
Public works
Recreation and culture
Capital outlay
Public works
Recreation and culture
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over expenditures
Other financing sources (uses)
Transfers in
Transfers out
Total other financing sources (uses)
Net change in fund balance
Fund balance at begining of year
Fund balance at end of year
Special Revenue Funds
Capital Project Funds
City Street
Street
Park &
Minnesota
CDBG -
Storm Sewer
Recon-
Lighting
Pathway
Investment
Cemetery Revitalization
Access
struction
Improvement
Dedication
Total
$
$ - $
$ -
$
$ 77,790
$
$ 77,790
14,517
460,683
-
475,200
17,760
601
5
16,771
28,178
9,328
18,512
91,155
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,929
17,929
17,760
15,118
5
477,454
28,178
87,118
36,441
662,074
-
-
-
18,540
-
-
-
18,540
17,037
-
-
63,181
80,218
-
49,460
-
49,460
-
-
-
1,342,558
1,342,558
-
17,037
-
18,540
-
49,460
1,405,739
1,490,776
17,760
(1,919)
5
458,914
28,178
37,658
(1,369,298)
(828,702)
-
-
-
-
-
753,500
753,500
(235,567)
(45,608)
-
(281,175)
-
-
(235,567)
(45,608)
-
753,500
472,325
17,760
(1,919)
5
223,347
(17,430)
37,658
(615,798)
(356,377)
1,120,404
33,647
358
1,174,049
1,775,943
681,660
1,236,659
6,022,720
$ 1,138,164
$ 31,728 $
363
$ 1,397,396
$ 1,758,513
$ 719,318
$ 620,861
$ 5,666,343
22
AMID-
till
r` j r
sw
--_
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS are used to account for the financing of centralized services to city departments on a cost -reimbursement basis
(including depreciation).
Benefit Accrual Fund — This fund was established to account for resources accumulated to satisfy paid -time -off (PTO) and sick leave liabilities of
governmental employees.
Central Equipment Fund — This fund was established to account for equipment purchase and rental to various governmental fund departments.
Information Technology (IT) Services Fund — This fund was established to account for the accumulation and distribution of various IT related costs,
including communications, software support, capital and non -capital equipment, and software purchases.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Combining Statement of Net Position
Internal Service Funds
December 31, 2016
Benefit
Central
IT
Accrual
Equipment
Services
Total
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and investments
$ 264,219
$ 764,353
$ 213,705
$ 1,242,277
Noncurrent assets
Capital assets
Machinery and equipment
-
960,855
17,013
977,868
Less accumulated depreciation
(175,241)
(11,839)
(187,080)
Total noncurrent assets
-
785,614
5,174
790,788
TOTAL ASSETS
264,219
1,549,967
218,879
2,033,065
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
-
-
709
709
Accrued interest payable
819
-
819
Bonds payable due within one year
-
120,000
120,000
Compensated absences due within one year
100,613
-
-
100,613
Total current liabilities
100,613
120,819
709
222,141
Noncurrent liabilities
Bonds payable, net current portion
-
605,000
-
605,000
Compensated absences payable
159,049
-
159,049
Total noncurrent liabilities
159,049
605,000
-
764,049
TOTAL LIABILITIES
259,662
725,819
709
986,190
NET POSITION
Net investment in capital assets
-
60,614
5,174
65,788
Unrestricted
4,557
763,534
212,996
981,087
TOTAL NET POSITION
$ 4,557
$ 824,148
$ 218,170
$ 1,046,875
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position
Internal Service Funds
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Operating revenues
Charges to other funds
Operating expenses
Personal services
Materials and supplies
Other services and charges
Depreciation
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Nonoperating revenues (expenses)
Investment earnings
Interest expense
Total nonoperating revenues (expenses)
Change in net position
Net position at beginning of year
Net position at end of year
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Benefit
Central
IT
Accrual
Equipment
Services
Total
$ 33,504
$ 193,800
$ 298,981
$ 526,285
33,504
-
-
33,504
-
41,101
41,101
-
169,454
169,454
-
80,504
3,403
83,907
33,504
80,504
213,958
327,966
-
113,296
85,023
198,319
4,557
12,125
1,820
18,502
-
(16,182)
-
(16,182)
4,557
(4,057)
1,820
2,320
4,557
109,239
86,843
200,639
-
714,909
131,327
846,236
$ 4,557
$ 824,148
$ 218,170
$ 1,046,875
70
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Combining Statement of Cash Flows
Internal Service Funds
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
71
Benefit
Central
IT
Accrual
Equipment
Services
Total
Cash flow from operating activities
Cash received from internal customers
$
33,504
$ 193,800
$
298,981
$
526,285
Cash paid to suppliers for goods and services
-
-
(195,696)
(195,696)
Net cash provided by operating activities
33,504
193,800
103,285
330,589
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities
Acquisition of capital assets
-
(159,041)
-
(159,041)
Principal payments on long-term debt
(115,000)
(115,000)
Interest and fiscal charges paid on long-term debt
(16,259)
(16,259)
Net cash (used) by capital and related financing activities
-
(290,300)
-
(290,300)
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest on investments
4,557
12,125
1,820
18,502
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
38,061
(84,375)
105,105
58,791
Cash and cash equivalents - January 1
226,158
848,728
108,600
1,183,486
Cash and cash equivalents - December 31
$
264,219
$ 764,353
$
213,705
$
1,242,277
Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Operating income (loss)
$
-
$ 113,296
$
85,023
$
198,319
Adjustments to Reconcile Operating Income (Loss)
to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation
80,504
3,403
83,907
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in prepaid items
-
26,873
26,873
Increase (decrease) in accounts and contracts payable
-
(12,014)
(12,014)
Increase (decrease) in compensated absences
33,504
-
-
33,504
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
33,504
$ 193,800
$
103,285
$
330,589
71
lZCIOF
MontikeHo
(This page left blank intentionally)
72
71i
TFI-E s U P L Y SC EDIUL
7Z!t
Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses)
General Fund
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Revenue and other sources - summary:
Property taxes
Franchise taxes
Special assessments
Licenses and permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Fines and forfeitures
Investment earnings
Other
Sales of capital assets
Interfund transfers
Total Revenues & Other Sources
Revenue and other sources - detail:
Taxes
Property tax - current
Property tax - delinquent
Mobile home tax
Penalties and interest - taxes
Franchise taxes
Franchise taxes - electric
Franchise taxes - other
Special assessments
Assessment for services/projects
Licenses & Permits
Liquor license
Beer license
Other business licenses & permits
Building permits
Fire sprinkler permits
Variance/conditional use permits
Driveway permits
Grading permits
Mobile home permits
Excavation permits
Right-of-way permits
Sign/banner permits
Animal licenses
CITY OF MONTICELLO
(continued)
73
2016
Variance with
2012
2013
2014
2015
Final
2016
Final
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Budget
Actual
Budget
$ 5,711,491
$ 5,605,101
$ 5,527,958
$ 5,906,255
$ 6,196,500
$ 6,204,429
$ 7,929
195,500
217,000
216,500
216,500
264,400
263,900
(500)
10,349
22,351
22,808
1,330
300
242
(58)
275,198
331,136
378,810
461,049
338,900
668,602
329,702
301,895
372,632
320,691
354,679
300,477
389,005
88,528
312,807
281,138
319,477
349,601
268,364
351,702
83,338
63,106
41,124
1,900
42,474
42,100
30,656
(11,444)
85,603
(52,134)
150,754
64,037
100,000
99,237
(763)
406,167
169,997
180,104
241,721
84,959
263,783
178,824
-
-
-
30,473
-
11,180
11,180
1,729
-
-
-
-
-
-
7,363,845
6,988,345
7,119,002
7,668,119
7,596,000
8,282,736
686,736
5,420,093
5,505,158
5,483,145
5,840,880
6,177,000
6,152,157
(24,843)
249,876
75,279
24,140
46,786
-
31,704
31,704
12,790
13,362
17,575
15,077
14,500
16,324
1,824
28,732
11,302
3,098
3,512
5,000
4,244
(756)
195,000
216,500
216,500
216,500
263,900
263,900
-
500
500
-
-
500
-
(500)
10,349
22,351
22,808
1,330
300
242
(58)
50,290
50,320
44,612
45,640
48,000
45,895
(2,105)
913
912
964
1,013
900
1,013
113
4,673
3,476
3,707
2,545
3,500
5,295
1,795
207,574
260,981
315,466
395,024
280,000
598,983
318,983
-
-
-
215
-
-
-
2,800
2,550
2,600
2,100
1,100
-
(1,100)
75
50
25
75
150
30
(120)
-
-
-
-
200
-
(200)
380
475
95
325
200
180
(20)
1,250
3,050
3,850
6,125
-
7,125
7,125
3,551
3,092
3,158
2,677
-
3,144
3,144
3,320
5,790
4,025
4,135
4,500
5,694
1,194
372
440
308
1.175
350
1.243
893
(continued)
73
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses)
General Fund
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued)
74
2016
Variance with
2012
2013
2014
2015
Final
2016
Final
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Budget
Actual
Budget
Intergovernmental Revenue
Pera increase aid
$ 6,741
$ 6,741 $
6,741
$ 6,741
$ 6,740
$ 6,741
$ 1
State highway aid - operating
109,379
107,173
111,280
125,258
101,737
131,898
30,161
Fire department aid - operating
74,221
109,594
108,186
120,027
80,000
123,656
43,656
Police department aid - operating
59,062
65,767
63,205
66,814
63,000
68,710
5,710
County operating grant - street/highway
41,370
38,579
-
19,642
19,000
55,780
36,780
County operating grant - civil defense
11,122
11,678
13,157
2,221
12,000
2,220
(9,780)
County operating grant - recycling
-
33,100
18,122
13,976
18,000
-
(18,000)
Charges for Services
Zoning/subdivision fees
2,500
850
1,200
1,050
700
(700)
Sale of maps and publications
38
15
-
-
25
-
(25)
Assessment searches
2,850
7,125
8,174
11,100
2,500
12,760
10,260
Blight notice fee
350
2,200
(1,650)
350
-
320
320
Final plat fee
100
50
250
150
-
-
-
Planning administration fee
30,007
450
550
900
600
5,950
5,350
NSF fee
-
-
90
30
-
30
30
Inspection/construction fees
451
861
983
826
965
965
Inspection fees - buildings
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Contractor licensing fee
550
1,300
1,825
1,075
100
825
725
Fire protections fees - townships
133,773
124,227
124,227
126,439
126,439
131,717
5,278
Fire emergency response fee
7,000
4,250
4,883
11,250
4,000
4,900
900
Fire - other fees
6,024
3,091
2,050
2,165
1,000
3,814
2,814
Blight mowing fees
682
1,865
(559)
625
1,000
450
(550)
Rental housing fees
36,415
43,355
55,030
45,210
45,000
49,020
4,020
Animal control fees
28,755
29,539
34,462
36,869
31,000
36,089
5,089
Miscellaneous pubic works
186
-
8,981
-
-
-
-
Tree and brush removal charge
-
2,200
6,755
1,000
3,290
2,290
Recycling bin fee
485
-
-
260
-
-
-
Garbage fee - taxable
44,069
44,199
44,992
90,310
44,000
89,656
45,656
Garbage miscellaneous fee
660
786
17,488
-
-
-
-
Garbage surcharge - not taxable
7,863
7,887
2,340
240
2,500
300
(2,200)
Field/Tourneyfees
3,250
3,906
4,019
4,544
3,500
5,679
2,179
Park rental fees
4,524
4,982
5,099
6,305
5,000
4,962
(38)
Memorial program revenue
-
-
-
1,404
-
-
-
Developer cost reimbursement
138
200
2,843
1,744
750
750
General charges for services
2,137
-
-
-
-
225
225
Fines & Forfeitures
Court fines
48,768
39,399
-
41,761
42,000
30,150
(11,850)
Animal impound fines
145
225
400
713
100
506
406
Liquor license violation
1,500
1,500
1,500
-
-
-
-
Administration offense fines
12,693
-
-
(continued)
74
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses)
General Fund
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued)
75
2016
Variance with
2012
2013
2014
2015
Final
2016
Final
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Budget
Actual
Budget
Investment Earnings
Investment earnings
$
73,623
$
(62,833)
$
145,211
$
64,037
$
100,000
$
99,237
$
(763)
Interest - loans
11,980
10,699
5,543
-
-
-
-
Miscellaneous Revenue
City property rental
1,600
1,600
1,600
1,600
1,600
1,600
-
Billboard land rental
32,023
19,888
20,146
2,150
20,000
21,149
1,149
Lease - Prairie Center
37,933
38,476
37,511
22,500
21,000
24,006
3,006
Lease - communication tower
-
-
8,000
22,180
24,000
24,905
905
Contributions
6,277
23,250
4,000
5,958
2,500
5,315
2,815
Sale of city property
3,021
374
1,994
1,831
500
10,650
10,150
Sale of lock boxes
684
1,015
855
1,368
700
1,710
1,010
Tree Sales
-
-
5,600
6,026
-
7,533
7,533
Copies
381
-
21
49
70
19
(51)
Refunds & reimbursables
76,892
44,100
55,030
75,416
-
88,860
88,860
Assessment fee reimbursement
29,850
24,525
24,675
23,026
24,150
24,150
Fire contributions
-
-
11,400
13,268
7,852
7,852
Insurance claims
195,830
9,433
-
29,926
-
-
-
Other miscellaneous
21,676
7,336
9,272
36,423
14,589
46,034
31,445
Other Financing Sources
Sales of capital assets
-
-
-
30,473
-
11,180
11,180
Transfers from other funds
1,729
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total revenues and other sources
$
7,363,845
$
6,988,345
$
7,119,002
$
7,668,119
$
7,596,000
$
8,282,736
$
686,736
Expenditures and other uses - summary
General government
$
1,412,578
$
1,389,599
$
1,438,346
$
1,457,376
$
1,549,577
$
1,482,666
$
(66,911)
Public safety
1,784,357
1,844,833
1,845,073
1,972,986
2,077,441
2,036,777
(40,664)
Public works
1,702,395
1,700,161
1,792,870
1,709,063
2,246,002
1,802,884
(443,118)
Sanitation
500,037
505,996
517,956
563,477
614,437
600,300
(14,137)
Transit
-
-
10,000
40,000
40,000
41,250
1,250
Recreation and culture
814,260
853,777
792,678
964,385
1,060,522
1,021,709
(38,813)
General unallocated
279,302
165,923
12,584
8,082
8,021
7,226
(795)
Transfers out and other uses
2,393,502
92,000
293,000
297,012
-
-
-
Total expenditures and other uses
$
8,886,431
$
6,552,289
$
6,702,507
$
7,012,381
$
7,596,000
$
6,992,812
$
(603,188)
Expenditures and other uses - divisions
General government
Mayor and council
$
51,988
$
53,696
$
52,181
$
52,572
$
53,925
$
57,507
$
3,582
City administration
228,738
260,322
273,993
312,491
320,099
320,450
351
City clerk
38,933
2,425
41,835
2,979
42,864
66,031
23,167
Finance
337,348
326,510
385,662
377,867
428,980
393,754
(35,226)
Audit
39,227
47,823
53,541
37,798
45,000
39,273
(5,727)
City assessing
49,600
49,664
49,832
50,466
52,115
50,415
(1,700)
Legal
40,275
46,905
29,303
36,946
37,000
29,152
(7,848)
(continued)
75
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses)
General Fund
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued)
76
2016
Variance with
2012
2013
2014
2015
Final
2016
Final
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Budget
Actual
Budget
General government (continued)
Human resources
$ 84,041
$ 93,067
$ 90,565
$ 117,249
$ 118,688
$ 116,522
$ (2,166)
Planning and zoning
163,629
182,753
220,080
244,976
218,023
210,173
(7,850)
Information technology services
130,102
95,572
33,759
19,872
11,540
692
(10,848)
City hall
233,602
215,507
193,186
190,833
207,223
189,780
(17,443)
Prairie center building
15,095
15,355
14,409
13,327
14,120
8,917
(5,203)
Public safety
Law Enforcement
1,187,382
1,190,441
1,098,403
1,174,439
1,222,627
1,212,080
(10,547)
Fire and rescue
207,778
222,141
306,780
309,970
333,823
289,010
(44,813)
Fire relief
74,221
109,594
108,186
120,027
80,000
123,656
43,656
Building inspections
248,376
251,007
266,544
304,858
369,663
350,304
(19,359)
Civil defense
2,719
9,707
1,660
1,500
3,930
1,234
(2,696)
Animal control
49,594
47,426
49,439
48,754
51,348
46,943
(4,405)
National Guard
14,287
14,517
14,061
13,438
16,050
13,550
(2,500)
Public works
Public works administration
176,457
113,882
122,151
124,504
194,771
126,327
(68,444)
Engineering
200,287
224,028
195,841
110,555
160,058
111,795
(48,263)
Public works inspecitons
64,827
54,878
36,867
32,084
88,809
62,100
(26,709)
Streets and alleys
655,170
689,046
735,629
737,836
976,962
806,098
(170,864)
Ice and snow
133,193
210,552
308,387
263,020
284,280
264,232
(20,048)
Shop and garage
219,646
186,741
177,644
185,837
204,101
171,079
(33,022)
Stormwater
51,468
12,064
16,842
26,712
73,121
29,277
(43,844)
Parking lots
4,568
2,965
3,814
2,030
-
-
Street lighting
196,779
206,005
195,695
226,485
263,900
231,976
(31,924)
Sanitation
Refuse and recycling collection
500,037
505,996
517,956
563,477
614,437
600,300
(14,137)
Transit
Bus service
-
-
10,000
40,000
40,000
41,250
1,250
Recreation and culture
Community celebrations
5,165
1,186
688
2,199
2,500
5,684
3,184
Senior center
88,441
90,219
97,547
97,115
101,672
99,124
(2,548)
Ice arena
75,000
75,000
-
-
-
-
Park operations
533,537
572,985
570,639
706,934
824,997
775,738
(49,259)
Park ballfields
29,419
25,517
18,149
16,971
27,300
20,538
(6,762)
Shade tree
52,983
53,475
68,891
104,990
63,527
75,802
12,275
Library
29,715
35,395
36,764
36,176
40,526
44,823
4,297
General unallocated
Insurances and other
279,302
165,923
12,584
8,082
8,021
7,226
(795)
Transfers out and other uses
Transfers out
2,393,502
92,000
293,000
297,012
-
-
-
Total expenditures & other uses
$ 8,886,431
$ 6,552,289
$ 6,702,507
$ 7,012,381
$ 7,596,000
$ 6,992,812
$ (603,188
Revenue over/(under) expenditures
$ (1,522,586)
$ 436,056
$ 416,495
$ 655,738
$ -
$ 1,289,924
1,289,924
76
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Budget and Actual - Minnesota Investment Fund
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Orginal and Final
Budget Actual
Revenues
Investment earnings $ 25,000 $ 17,760
Fund balance at beginning of year 1,120,404 1,120,404
Fund balance at end of year $ 1,145,404 $ 1,138,164
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Variance with
Final Budget
$ (7,240)
$ (7,240)
77
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Budget and Actual - Cemetery Fund
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Orginal and Final
Budget Actual
Revenues
Charges for services $ 26,000 $ 14,517
Investment earnings 1,000 601
Total revenues 27,000 15,118
Expenditures
Current
Recreation and culture
Cemetery operations
Net change in fund balance
Fund balance at beginning of year
Fund balance at end of year
27,000
33,647
$ 33,647
17,037
(1,919)
33,647
$ 31,728
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Variance with
Final Budget
$ (11,483)
(399)
(11,882)
(9,963)
(1,919)
$ (1,919)
78
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Budget and Actual - CDBG-Reviatlization Fund
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Orginal and Final Variance with
Budget Actual Final Budget
Revenues
Investment earnings $ - $ 5 $ 5
Fund balance at beginning of year 358 358 -
Fund balance at end of year $ 358 $ 363 $ 5
79
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances
Economic Development Authority
December 31, 2016
LIABILITIES
Accounts and contracts payable $
Intrafund payable
Unearned revenue
Total liabilities
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
CITY OF MONTICELLO
TIF TIF
EDA
TIF
General GMEF
ASSETS
Future 6(d)
Cash and investments
$ 1,913,983 $ 1,148,898 $
Receivables
24
Unremitted taxes
523 -
Delinquent taxes
740
Accounts receivable
100
Intrafund receivable
971,755
Prepaid items
1,638
Land held for resale
2,030,757 -
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 4,919,496 $ 1,148,898 $
LIABILITIES
Accounts and contracts payable $
Intrafund payable
Unearned revenue
Total liabilities
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
CITY OF MONTICELLO
TIF TIF
TIF
TIF
TIF
TIF
Future 6(d)
19
20
22
24
$ 703,243
$ 183,566
$ 140,843
$ 561,455
$ 76,641
-
-
-
163,200
-
$ 703,243
$ 183,566
$ 140,843
$ 724,655
$ 76,641
6,596 $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $
- 44,497 386,574
- - 163,200
6,596 44,497 549,774
Unavailable revenue - property taxes 740
FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable 2,032,395 -
Restricted - 1,148,898
Assigned 2,879,765 -
Total fund balance 4,912,160 1,148,898
TOTAL LIABILITIES,
AND FUND BALANCES $ 4,919,496 $ 1,148,898 $
(d) = decertified
703,243 183,566 140,843 174,881 76,641
(44,497) - - - - -
(44,497) 703,243 183,566 140,843 174,881 76,641
- $ 703,243 $ 183,566 $ 140,843 $ 724,655 $ 76,641
(Continued)
M
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances
Economic Development Authority
December 31, 2016 (Continued)
LIABILITIES
Accounts and contracts payable $
Intrafund payable
Unearned revenue
Total liabilities
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Unavailable revenue - property taxes
FUND BALANCES
134,989 19,715
134,989 19,715
CITY OF MONTICELLO
TIF TIF TIF GAAP Total
35 38 39 Reconciliation EDA
2,166 $ $ 56 $ $ 4,951,330
- - 1,901
740
100
(971,755) -
1,638
- - 2,193,957
2,166 $ $ 56 $ (971,755) $ 7,149,666
$ - $ - $ - $ 6,596
115,305 270,675 (971,755) -
- - (163,200) -
115,305 270,675 (1,134,955) 6,596
Nonspendable - - -
Restricted 101,812 (34,803) 144 2,166 (115,305)
Assigned - - -
Total fund balance 101,812 (34,803) 144 2,166 (115,305)
TOTAL LIABILITIES,
AND FUND BALANCES $ 101,812 $ 100,186 $ 19,859 $ 2,166 $ - $
(d) = decertified
740
- 2,032,395
(270,619) 163,200 2,274,667
- 2,835,268
(270,619) 163,200 7,142,330
56 $ (971,755) $ 7,149,666
81
TIF
TIF
TIF
29
30
34
ASSETS
Cash and investments
$ 100,434
$ 100,186
$ 19,859 $
Receivables
Unremitted taxes
1,378
-
-
Delinquent taxes
-
Accounts
Intrafund receivable
Prepaid items
Land held for resale
-
-
-
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 101,812
$ 100,186
$ 19,859 $
LIABILITIES
Accounts and contracts payable $
Intrafund payable
Unearned revenue
Total liabilities
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Unavailable revenue - property taxes
FUND BALANCES
134,989 19,715
134,989 19,715
CITY OF MONTICELLO
TIF TIF TIF GAAP Total
35 38 39 Reconciliation EDA
2,166 $ $ 56 $ $ 4,951,330
- - 1,901
740
100
(971,755) -
1,638
- - 2,193,957
2,166 $ $ 56 $ (971,755) $ 7,149,666
$ - $ - $ - $ 6,596
115,305 270,675 (971,755) -
- - (163,200) -
115,305 270,675 (1,134,955) 6,596
Nonspendable - - -
Restricted 101,812 (34,803) 144 2,166 (115,305)
Assigned - - -
Total fund balance 101,812 (34,803) 144 2,166 (115,305)
TOTAL LIABILITIES,
AND FUND BALANCES $ 101,812 $ 100,186 $ 19,859 $ 2,166 $ - $
(d) = decertified
740
- 2,032,395
(270,619) 163,200 2,274,667
- 2,835,268
(270,619) 163,200 7,142,330
56 $ (971,755) $ 7,149,666
81
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Economic Development Authority
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
82
EDA
TIF TIF
TIF
TIF
TIF
TIF
General
GMEF
Future 6 (d)
19
20
22
24
Revenues
Property taxes
$ 279,422
$
$ $
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Tax increments
-
30,972
17,592
281,330
41,634
Investment earnings
20,454
15,544
9,515
2,274
1,830
7,159
894
Interest on intrafund loans
20,525
-
-
-
-
-
-
Other revenues
290,409
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total revenues
610,810
15,544
9,515
33,246
19,422
288,489
42,528
Expenditures:
Current
Salary and wages
50,910
-
-
-
-
-
-
Benefits
18,048
Supplies
81
-
Professional services - legal
25,322
1,023
Professional services - other
59,679
-
LPV Insurance
1,867
-
-
-
-
Legal and general publications
312
31
31
31
31
Property taxes
1,318
-
-
-
-
Marketing
2,500
Dues and membership
4,846
-
Utilities
585
228
IT services
1,409
-
Travel and conferences
709
Land adjustment to market
50,300
-
Other expenses
3,585
1,126
Excess increments
-
166,289
Interest on intrafund loans
-
-
-
PAYG payments to third parties
-
-
6,333
48,751
20,520
Total expenditures
221,471
-
-
31
6,364
217,448
20,551
Excess (deficiency) of revenues over
expenditures
389,339
15,544
9,515
33,215
13,058
71,041
21,977
Other financing uses
Transfers out
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Net change in fund balances
389,339
15,544
9,515
33,215
13,058
71,041
21,977
Fund balance at beginning of year
4,522,821
1,133,354
(44,497) 693,728
150,351
127,785
103,840
54,664
Fund balance at end of year
$ 4,912,160
$ 1,148,898
$ (44,497) $ 703,243
$ 183,566
$ 140,843
$ 174,881
$ 76,641
(Continued)
82
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Economic Development Authority
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued)
Revenues
Property taxes
Tax increments
Investment earnings
Interest on intrafund loans
Other revenues
Total revenues
Expenditures:
Current
Salary and wages
Benefits
Supplies
Professional services - legal
Professional services - other
LPV Insurance
Legal and general publications
Property taxes
Marketing
Dues and membership
Utilities
IT services
Travel and conferences
Land adjustment to market
Other expenses
Excess increments
Interest on intrafund loans
PAYG payments to third parties
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of revenues over
expenditures
Other financing uses
Transfers out
Net change in fund balances
Fund balance at beginning of year
Fund balance at end of year
CITY OF MONTICELLO
TIF
TIF
TIF
TIF TIF
TIF
GAAP
Total
29
30
34
35 38
39
Reconciliation
EDA
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ $ -
$ -
$
$ 279,422
22,590
9,120
208,243
11,421
45,450
$ (115,305)
668,352
1,330
1,350
135
43 -
-
60,528
-
-
-
-
(20,525)
-
-
-
-
- -
-
290,409
23,920
10,470
208,378
43 11,421
45,450
(20,525)
1,298,711
31
31
-
3,493
16,969
-
17,000
3,524
6,920
6,946
6,920
6,946
94,892
(41,749)
$ 101,812
$ (34,803) $
50,910
18,048
81
1,957 28,302
- 59,679
- - - 1,867
31 31 31 591
- - - 1,318
2,500
4,846
813
1,409
- 709
45,800 96,100
- 4,711
- - 166,289
4,873 12,159 (20,525) -
- - - - - 92,573
31 1,988 4,904 12,159 25,275 530,746
208,347
(1,945)
6,517
33,291
(45,800)
767,965
(188,500)
-
-
(188,500)
19,847
(1,945)
6,517
33,291
(45,800)
579,465
(19,703)
4,111
(121,822)
(303,910)
209,000
6,562,865
144 $
2,166
$ (115,305)
$ (270,619)
$ 163,200
$ 7,142,330
83
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balances
Debt Service Activities
December 31, 2016
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables
Unremitted special assessments
Deliquent special assessments
Deferred special assessments
Total assets
LIABILITIES
Accounts and contracts payable
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Unavailable revenue - special assessments
FUND BALANCES
Restricted for debt service
Total liabilities, deferred inflows
of resources, and fund balances
84
General Obligation Bonds
2007A
2008B
2010A
2011A
2014A
2015B
2016A
Improvement
Sewer
Improvement
Refunding
Bonds
Bonds
Bonds
Total
$ (182,448)
$ 1,067,997
$ 1,020,505
$ 1,261,783
$
36,728
$
66,621
$
263,638
$
3,534,824
6,810
-
3,165
-
-
-
-
9,975
2,555
6,607
117
-
-
9,279
297,254
-
159,154
1,927,740
-
154,754
818,044
3,356,946
$ 124,171
$ 1,067,997
$ 1,189,431
$ 3,189,640
$
36,728
$
221,375
$
1,081,682
$
6,911,024
$ 208
$ 208
$ 208
$ 208
$
208
$
208
$
-
$
1,248
299,809
-
165,762
1,927,856
-
154,754
818,044
3,366,225
(175,846)
1,067,789
1,023,461
1,261,576
36,520
66,413
263,638
3,543,551
$ 124,171
$ 1,067,997
$ 1,189,431
$ 3,189,640
$
36,728
$
221,375
$
1,081,682
$
6,911,024
84
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Debt Service Activities
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Revenues
Property taxes
Special assessments
Investment earnings
Total revenues
Expenditures
Debt service
Principal
Interest and fiscal charges
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over expenditures
Other financing sources
Transfers in
Net change in fund balance
Fund balance at begining of year
Fund balance at end of year
CITY OF MONTICELLO
85
General Obligation Bonds
2007A
2008B
2010A
2011A
2014A
2015B
2016A
Improvement
Sewer
Improvement
Refunding
Bonds
Bonds
Bonds
Total
$ 420,000
$ 500,000
$ 40,000
$ 330,000
$ 544,000
$ 250,000
$ -
$ 2,084,000
116,066
-
68,483
336,961
-
27,855
263,182
812,547
674
21,492
7,798
4,794
689
520
456
36,423
536,740
521,492
116,281
671,755
544,689
278,375
263,638
2,932,970
1,124,653
1,472,000
270,000
2,320,000
350,000
145,000
-
5,681,653
58,548
95,706
34,708
107,008
165,519
67,627
529,116
1,183,201
1,567,706
304,708
2,427,008
515,519
212,627
-
6,210,769
(646,461)
(1,046,214)
(188,427)
(1,755,253)
29,170
65,748
263,638
(3,277,799)
685,000
565,636
188,500
-
-
-
1,439,136
(646,461)
(361,214)
377,209
(1,566,753)
29,170
65,748
263,638
(1,838,663)
470,615
1,429,003
646,252
2,828,329
7,350
665
-
5,382,214
$ (175,846)
$ 1,067,789
$ 1,023,461
$ 1,261,576
$ 36,520
$ 66,413
$ 263,638
$ 3,543,551
85
IZCITY OF
MMontic110
(This page left blank intentionally)
0
>'. -�
REM
�- TATIC
yam'
STATISTICAL SECTION
The Statistical Section is included to provide detailed data on the physical, economic, social and political characteristics of the reporting
government. It is intended to provide the user with a broader and more complete understanding of the government and its financial affairs than is
possible from the basic financial statements and supplementary information included in the Financial Section.
Paqe
Financial trends
Net Position by Component - Last Ten Fiscal Years
87
Changes in Net Position - Last Ten Fiscal years
88
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years
90
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years
91
Governmental Funds Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting)
92
General Governmental Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting)
93
Revenue capacity
Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property - Last Ten Fiscal Years
94
Property Tax Rates - All Direct and Overlapping Governments - Last Ten Fiscal Years
95
Property Tax Levies and Collections - Last Ten Fiscal Years
96
Principal Property Taxpayers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago
97
Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons) - Last Ten Fiscal Years
98
Water and Sewage Utility Rates - Last Ten Fiscal Years
99
Debt capacity
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type - Last Ten Fiscal Years
100
Ratios of Net General Obligation Bonded Debt Outstanding - Last Ten Fiscal Years
101
Legal Debt Margin Information - Last Ten Fiscal Years
102
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt
103
Schedule of General Obligation Revenue Bond Coverage - Last Four Fiscal Years
104
Economic and demographic information
Demographic and Economic Statistics - Last Ten Fiscal Years
105
Principal Employers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago
106
Operating information
City Government Employees by Function/Program - Last Ten Fiscal Years
107
Operating Indicators by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years
108
Capital Assets Statistics by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years
110
Net Position by Component
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(accrual basis of accounting)
Governmental activities
Net investment in
capital assets
Restricted
Unrestricted
Total governmental
net position
Business -type activities
Net investment in
capital assets
Restricted
Unrestricted
Total business -type
net position
Primary government
Net investment in
capital assets
Restricted
Unrestricted
Total primary government
net position
CITY OF MONTICELLO
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
$ 12,476,536
$ 27,584,763
$ 33,712,370
$ 31,901,676
$ 38,242,040
$ 40,525,009
$ 44,268,757
$ 48,253,810
$ 38,099,568
$ 41,077,683
31,517,792
22,074,427
17,688,193
18,337,866
16,894,936
13,061,044
18,118,070
10,453,449
12,633,770
10,569,693
24,543,501
28,445,230
28,183,161
26,876,421
24,758,269
25,119,107
13,487,299
14,792,521
18,144,067
20,824,170
$ 68,537,829
$ 78,104,420
$ 79,583,724
$ 77,115,963
$ 79,895,245
$ 78,705,160
$ 75,874,126
$ 73,499,780
$ 68,877,405
$ 72,471,546
$ 33,971,151
$ 31,375,890
$ 29,910,696
$ 28,556,355
$ 25,031,043
$ 23,698,091
$ 20,496,832
$ 42,117,264
$ 40,722,087
$ 41,014,122
-
19,350
19,350
19,350
19,350
19,350
-
-
-
-
6,441,470
4,529,830
2,846,018
6,363,148
6,901,353
7,642,046
6,463,638
9,121,952
8,163,982
9,052,590
$ 40,412,621
$ 35,925,070
$ 32,776,064
$ 34,938,853
$ 31,951,746
$ 31,359,487
$ 26,960,470
$ 51,239,216
$ 48,886,069
$ 50,066,712
$ 46,447,687
$ 58,960,653
$ 63,623,066
$ 60,458,031
$ 63,273,083
$ 64,223,100
$ 64,765,589
$ 90,371,074
$ 78,821,655
$ 82,091,805
31,517,792
22,093,777
17,707,543
18,357,216
16,914,286
13,080,394
18,118,070
10,453,449
12,633,770
10,569,693
30,984,971
32,975,060
31,029,179
33,239,569
31,659,622
32,761,153
19,950,937
23,914,473
26,308,049
29,876,760
$108,950,450
$114,029,490
$112,359,788
$112,054,816
$111,846,991
$110,064,647
$102,834,596
$124,738,996
$117,763,474
$122,538,258
$100
$80
c $60
$40
$20
Primary Government Net Position
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
■ Net investment in
capital assets
■ Restricted net
position
■ Unrestricted net
position
Note 1: In fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the city had a change in accounting principle, a change in fund structure, and prior period adjustments. Prior years were not adjusted to reflect these changes.
Note 2: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 and GASB Statement No. 71 in fiscal year 2015. Years prior to 2015 have not been restated.
87
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Changes in Net Position
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(accrual basis of accounting)
Expenses
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Governmental activities
General government
$
1,844,320
$
1,572,389
$
1,780,972
$ 2,065,463 $
2,111,710
$
2,103,737
$ 1,623,727
$
1,488,243
$
1,447,725
$ 1,694,111
Public safety
1,693,116
1,792,351
2,849,272
1,766,712
1,788,595
1,819,378
1,884,981
1,880,193
1,960,009
2,187,363
Public works
4,559,460
4,634,167
3,827,501
3,579,291
4,838,544
5,045,729
5,163,461
5,223,345
5,312,612
5,480,074
Sanitation
509,208
514,208
547,160
534,903
495,693
500,037
487,268
517,956
563,477
600,300
Transit
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10,000
40,000
41,250
Recreation and culture
2,703,227
2,729,950
2,855,682
2,636,088
1,753,197
2,719,730
2,875,260
2,882,127
3,524,979
3,998,945
Economic development
769,584
510,126
842,819
2,647,687
1,199,936
803,594
1,005,813
1,084,620
1,547,875
756,620
Interest and fiscal charges
2,193,840
2,136,872
1,673,431
1,464,012
1,248,716
1,298,869
235,265
649,854
735,753
565,774
Total governmental activities expenses
14,272,755
13,890,063
14,376,837
14,694,156
13,436,391
14,291,074
13,275,775
13,736,338
15,132,430
15,324,437
Business -type activities
Water utility
973,375
975,846
1,018,098
936,718
1,167,572
1,118,789
1,009,600
1,084,882
1,102,610
1,168,473
Sewage utility
2,000,610
2,085,485
2,074,447
2,495,976
2,340,555
2,480,657
2,466,660
2,762,357
2,661,990
2,618,887
Liquor
644,857
620,743
669,940
637,574
658,999
662,002
689,559
692,976
798,631
831,809
Fiber optics
84,594
1,590,237
2,792,813
3,815,377
5,702,480
5,228,428
5,240,871
2,919,170
2,536,461
2,483,262
Deputy registrar
-
-
-
-
-
-
293,531
300,236
313,968
345,492
Total business -type activities expenses
3,703,436
5,272,311
6,555,298
7,885,645
9,869,606
9,489,876
9,700,221
7,759,621
7,413,660
7,447,923
Total primary government expenses
$
17,976,191
$
19,162,374
$
20,932,135
$ 22,579,801 $
23,305,997
$
23,780,950
$ 22,975,996
$
21,495,959
$
22,546,090
$ 22,772,360
Program Revenues
Governmental activities
Charges for services
General government
$
695,117
$
523,228
$
443,976
$ 491,304 $
521,182
$
619,992
$ 147,244
$
180,145
$
214,087
$ 274,309
Public safety
93,138
99,812
155,036
96,293
202,237
179,540
163,366
164,616
320,158
894,311
Public works
1,994,067
1,544,140
744,241
1,556,098
508,077
383,066
544,404
371,671
521,697
527,425
Sanitation
-
-
167,119
165,387
52,304
53,077
16,653
48,385
104,786
89,956
Recreation and culture
1,044,699
1,084,622
1,139,199
1,153,113
1,240,970
1,150,273
1,307,149
1,331,581
1,488,197
1,437,659
Economic development
6,768
15,875
155,769
-
-
-
-
-
14,653
301,232
Operating grants and contributions
160,147
159,192
269,492
424,845
253,127
252,784
293,710
295,828
355,041
389,005
Capital grants and contributions
3,616,870
948,340
2,067,509
4,124,271
2,083,511
1,841,915
1,079,738
1,774,628
2,667,710
3,297,265
Total governmental activities
program revenues
7,610,806
4,375,209
5,142,341
8,011,311
4,861,408
4,480,647
3,552,264
4,166,854
5,686,329
7,211,162
Business -type activities
Charges for services
Water utility
867,873
973,776
1,019,390
828,635
1,078,133
1,304,923
1,214,570
1,117,226
1,126,718
1,172,258
Sewage utility
1,196,983
1,307,064
1,371,776
1,470,537
1,712,058
1,850,919
1,981,491
2,081,660
2,083,122
2,223,252
Liquor
1,002,933
1,059,479
1,043,256
1,174,767
1,151,171
1,214,745
1,318,276
1,289,369
1,524,338
1,409,406
Fiber optics
-
-
-
456,820
1,610,258
1,747,587
1,606,720
1,761,978
1,642,403
1,739,566
Deputy registrar
-
-
-
-
-
456,285
497,798
535,931
562,891
Capital grants and contributions
482,412
106,787
-
-
-
-
-
488,628
1,454,980
2,000,456
Total business -type activities
program revenues
3,550,201
3,447,106
3,434,422
3,930,759
5,551,620
6,118,174
6,577,342
7,236,659
8,367,492
9,107,829
Total primary government
program revenues
$
11,161,007
$
7,822,315
$
8,576,763
$ 11,942,070 $
10,413,028
$
10,598,821
$ 10,129,606
$
11,403,513
$
14,053,821
$ 16,318,991
F.E.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Changes in Net Position
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(accrual basis of accounting)
(continued)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Net
Governmental activities
$
(6,661,949)
$ (9,514,854)
$ (9,234,496)
$ (6,682,845)
$ (8,574,983)
$ (9,810,427)
$ (9,723,511)
$ (9,569,484)
$
(9,446,101)
$
(8,113,275)
Business -type activities
(153,235)
(1,825,205)
(3,120,876)
(3,954,886)
(4,317,986)
(3,371,702)
(3,122,879)
(522,962)
953,832
1,659,906
Total primary government net expense
$
(6,815,184)
$ (11,340,059)
$ (12,355,372)
$ (10,637,731)
$ (12,892,969)
$ (13,182,129)
$ (12,846,390)
$ (10,092,446)
$
(8,492,269)
$
(6,453,369)
General Revenues and Other Changes in
Net Position
Governmental activities
Taxes
Property taxes
$
6,418,124
$ 7,278,152
$ 7,628,547
$ 7,105,319
$ 7,406,358
$ 7,722,214
$ 7,961,229
$ 8,393,374
$
8,683,585
$
9,270,592
Tax increment
824,714
1,172,447
1,193,021
1,155,386
1,044,791
1,024,134
965,935
826,363
727,617
668,352
Franchise taxes
-
-
48,517
371,258
341,362
339,518
320,640
357,409
333,484
412,217
Unrestricted grants and contributions
288,940
158,340
406,735
37,665
19,359
38,618
65,228
27,502
-
-
Investment earnings
2,170,025
1,461,658
770,178
859,583
1,467,780
767,722
(189,128)
784,347
278,465
375,614
Other
-
-
41,173
-
-
11,575
3,885
217,643
30,473
11,180
Gain on sale of capital assets
528,193
233,326
366,961
442,091
354,501
540,272
489,782
-
-
-
Transfers
997,929
371,245
251,133
(5,774,257)
713,655
(2,420,489)
278,500
(3,411,500)
2,301,045
969,461
Total governmental activities
11,227,925
10,675,168
10,706,265
4,197,045
11,347,806
8,023,564
9,896,071
7,195,138
12,354,669
11,707,416
Business -type activities
Investment earnings
326,356
547,703
188,178
236,131
495,484
264,589
(117,175)
399,757
108,191
128,080
Miscellaneous
62,664
136,356
42,360
125,326
1,555,509
100,687
65,468
-
88,157
5,218
Gain on extinguishment of debt
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20,990,451
-
-
Contribution of land to County
-
(5,511,547)
-
Transfer of operations
-
-
-
356,900
Transfers
(997,929)
(371,245)
(251,133)
5,774,257
(713,655)
2,420,489
(278,500)
3,411,500
(2,301,045)
(969,461)
Total business -type activities
(608,909)
312,814
(20,595)
6,135,714
1,337,338
2,785,765
(330,207)
24,801,708
(7,616,244)
(479,263)
Total primary government
$
10,619,016
$ 10,987,982
$ 10,685,670
$ 10,332,759
$ 12,685,144
$ 10,809,329
$ 9,565,864
$ 31,996,846
$
4,738,425
$
11,228,153
Changes in Net Position
Governmental activities
$
4,565,976
$ 1,160,314
$ 1,471,769
$ (2,485,800)
$ 2,772,823
$ (1,786,863)
$ 172,560
$ (2,374,346)
$
2,908,568
$
3,594,141
Business -type activities
(762,144)
(1,512,391)
(3,141,471)
2,180,828
(2,980,648)
(585,937)
(3,453,086)
24,278,746
(6,662,412)
1,180,643
Total primary government
$
3,803,832
$ (352,077)
$ (1,669,702)
$ (304,972)
$ (207,825)
$ (2,372,800)
$ (3,280,526)
$ 21,904,400
$
(3,753,844)
$
4,774,784
Note 1: The City made a fund structure change for the period
ending December
31, 2013. Prior year data has not been restated as a result of this change.
Note 2: The city implemented GASB Statement
No. 68 and
GASB Statement No. 71 in fiscal
year 2015. Years
prior to 2015 have not been restated.
W
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(modified accrual basis of accounting)
M
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
General Fund
Reserved
$ 430,294
$ 359,303
$ 392,541
$ 336,286
$
$
$ $
$
$
Unreserved
5,131,193
5,819,249
4,705,092
4,644,748
-
Nonspendable
-
-
-
-
386,616
342,380
258,100
126,327
113,302
134,245
Restricted
-
-
-
-
-
-
Committed
3,374,200
Assigned
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unassigned
649,821
3,136,127
3,656,463
4,204,731
4,873,494
6,142,475
Total general fund
$ 5,561,487
$ 6,178,552
$ 5,097,633
$ 4,981,034
$ 4,410,637
$ 3,478,507
$ 3,914,563 $
4,331,058
$ 4,986,796
$ 6,276,720
All other governmental funds
Reserved
$ 27,072,957
$ 16,663,801
$ 10,280,326
$ 7,884,431
$ -
$ -
$ - $
-
$ -
$ -
Unreserved
Special revenue
7,554,334
14,191,473
18,451,828
18,324,689
Capital projects
(630,214)
(1,839,478)
(2,124,391)
(1,532,220)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nonspendable
1,299,057
197,123
1,822,926
1,815,087
4,259,743
3,690,330
Restricted
22,140,662
21,480,938
10,928,985
10,453,449
8,619,905
6,987,234
Committed
2,662,124
-
-
-
-
-
Assigned
9,138,626
8,655,488
6,485,727
7,321,744
11,109,806
13,320,718
Unassigned
Special revenue
(141,890)
-
-
-
-
-
Capital projects
(1,435,666)
-
-
-
-
-
Total all other
governmental funds
$ 33,997,077
$ 29,015,796
$ 26,607,763
$ 24,676,900
$ 33,662,913
$ 30,333,549
$ 19,237,638 $
19,590,280
$ 23,989,454
$ 23,998,282
Note 1: The City made a fund structure change for the period ending December 31, 2013. Prior year
data has not been restated as a result of this change.
Note 2: The city implemented GASB 54 for the financial reporting period ending December 31, 2011.
Prior years have not been restated as a result of this
change.
M
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(modified accrual basis of accounting)
Note: The city made a fund structure change for the period ending December 31, 2013. Prior year data has not been modified to reflect this change
91
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Revenues
Property taxes
$ 6,190,599
$ 7,233,582
$ 7,502,844
$ 7,319,154
$ 7,294,635
$ 8,234,086
$ 7,985,695
$ 8,407,627
$ 8,638,401
$ 9,295,983
Tax increments
824,714
1,172,447
1,193,021
1,155,386
1,044,791
1,024,134
965,935
826,363
727,617
668,352
Franchise taxes
-
-
48,517
371,258
341,362
339,518
320,640
357,409
333,484
412,217
Special assessments
3,112,374
2,566,932
2,462,673
1,465,264
1,856,134
1,902,871
2,065,944
1,912,932
3,318,901
984,390
Licenses and permits
627,751
917,539
266,797
217,184
249,999
275,699
331,711
378,810
461,049
668,602
Intergovernmental
1,764,633
550,283
1,688,895
1,620,771
1,434,420
540,475
1,264,781
732,366
1,520,239
2,041,362
Charges for services
2,888,981
2,290,091
2,518,548
2,890,006
2,239,584
2,076,834
1,846,919
1,722,974
2,063,520
2,222,475
Fines and forfeitures
5,027
2,216
1,220
205
85
14,338
1,725
1,900
42,474
30,656
Investment earnings
2,170,025
1,461,658
770,178
859,583
1,467,780
767,722
(183,242)
738,956
261,856
357,112
Other revenues
372,502
197,988
435,186
643,873
603,019
753,832
700,776
413,113
475,170
589,394
Total revenues
17,956,606
16,392,736
16,887,879
16,542,684
16,531,809
15,929,509
15,300,884
15,492,450
17,842,711
17,270,543
Expenditures
General government
1,899,097
1,579,164
1,634,395
1,997,458
2,039,270
2,023,674
1,576,653
1,450,930
1,465,458
1,489,892
Public safety
1,603,331
1,736,962
2,738,768
1,684,296
1,728,409
1,735,579
1,805,434
1,845,073
1,972,986
2,036,777
Public works
1,951,712
2,380,993
2,074,811
1,562,155
1,675,222
1,703,849
1,707,576
1,793,162
1,734,562
1,941,750
Sanitation
509,208
514,208
547,160
534,903
495,693
500,037
505,996
517,956
563,477
600,300
Transit
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10,000
40,000
41,250
Culture and recreation
2,214,108
2,220,368
2,355,669
2,164,534
2,419,369
2,272,595
2,472,987
2,386,832
2,622,991
2,756,372
Economic development
772,852
525,783
842,819
2,647,687
1,198,449
800,540
1,011,961
1,084,620
1,237,107
530,746
Capital outlay
6,430,421
3,522,196
1,946,153
4,138,459
4,067,251
2,829,049
1,357,254
2,220,883
2,238,365
6,235,029
Debt service
Principal
3,388,382
5,037,028
6,749,293
5,001,000
4,860,000
5,174,500
5,290,750
5,411,000
5,028,000
5,681,653
Interest and fiscal charges
2,256,311
2,192,063
1,801,392
1,553,661
1,383,095
1,290,430
930,982
658,983
570,753
529,116
Bond issuance costs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
71,358
107,050
Total expenditures
21,025,422
19,708,765
20,690,460
21,284,153
19,866,758
18,330,253
16,659,593
17,379,439
17,545,057
21,949,935
Excess of revenues
over(under)expenditures
(3,068,816)
(3,316,029)
(3,802,581)
(4,741,469)
(3,334,949)
(2,400,744)
(1,358,709)
(1,886,989)
297,654
(4,679,392)
Other financing sources (uses)
Long-term debt issued
5,137,903
15,450,000
3,255,000
10,735,000
6,080,000
2,605,000
4,900,000
Premium (discount) on debt issued
83,710
-
(19,530)
301,910
(12,374)
46,898
97,503
Refunded bonds redeemed
-
(15,908,564)
(865,000)
-
(10,690,000)
-
-
Refunding deferred amortized (loss;
-
(384,432)
Sale of land held for resale
(103,084)
74,650
-
-
-
-
Sale of capital assets
37,520
2,575
62,496
67,569
-
11,575
12,428
-
30,473
11,180
Transfers in
5,202,051
16,818,090
10,172,878
4,687,126
5,710,819
9,990,120
6,906,770
4,914,385
4,261,817
2,192,636
Transfers out
(4,204,122)
(16,446,845)
(9,921,745)
(4,431,158)
(4,997,164)
(10,732,901)
(7,158,933)
(8,325,885)
(2,186,930)
(1,223,175)
Total other financing sources (uses)
6,153,978
(394,526)
313,629
2,694,007
11,750,565
(731,206)
(10,929,735)
2,656,126
4,757,258
5,978,144
Net change in fund balances
$ 3,085,162
$ (3,710,555)
$ (3,488,952)
$ (2,047,462)
$ 8,415,616
$ (3,131,950)
$ (12,288,4441
$ 769,137
$ 5,054,912
$ 1,298,752
Debt service as percentage
of noncapital expenditures
36.9%
43.7%
45.6%
38.2%
42.6%
41.4%
41.7%
40.0%
35.1%
38.0%
Note: The city made a fund structure change for the period ending December 31, 2013. Prior year data has not been modified to reflect this change
91
Governmental Funds Tax Revenues by Source
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(modified accrual basis of accounting)
Year
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Change
2007-2016
Source: Finance Department
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Property
Tax
Franchise
Tax
Increment
Tax
Total
$ 6,190,599
$ 824,714
$
$ 7,015,313
7,233,582
1,172,447
-
8,406, 029
7,502,844
1,193, 021
48,517
8,744, 382
7,319,154
1,155, 386
371,258
8,845, 798
7,294,635
1,044,791
341,362
8,680,788
8,234,086
1,024,134
339,518
9,597,738
7,985,695
965,935
320,640
9,272,270
8,407,627
826,363
357,409
9,591,399
8,638,401
727,617
333,484
9,699,502
9,295,983
668,352
412,217
10,376,552
50.2%
-19.0%
100.0%
47.9%
Tax Revenues by Source
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
■ Property Tax
■ Tax Increment
Franchise Tax
92
General Governmental Tax Revenues by Source
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(accrual basis of accounting)
Year
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Change
2007-2016
Source: Finance Department
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Property
Tax
Franchise
Tax
Increment
Tax
Total
$ 6,418,124
$ 824,714
$
$ 7,242,838
7,278,152
1,172,447
-
8,450,599
7,628,547
1,193,021
48,517
8,870,085
7,105, 319
1,155,386
371,258
8,631,963
7,406,358
1,044,791
341,362
8,792,511
7,722,214
1,024,134
339,518
9,085,866
7,961,229
965,935
320,640
9,247,804
8,393,374
826,363
357,409
9,577,146
8,683,585
727,617
333,484
9,744,686
9,270,592
668,352
412,217
10,351,161
44.4% -19.0%
Tax Revenues by Source
100.0%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
■ Property Tax
■Tax Increment
Franchise Tax
42.9%
93
Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property
Last Ten Fiscal Years
$30
$25
$20
N
C
° $15
$10
$5
$-
2007
Total
Taxable Net
% of Tax Capacity
Total Value *
1.1% $ 16,204,855
1.4% 17,312,075
1.7% 17,947,260
1.4% 17,400,280
1.4% 16,628,999
1.0% 19,579,693
0.9% 19,021,771
0.7% 24,646,698
0.6% 26,581,226
0.6% 28,307,628
Total Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value
(Excludes Personal and Ag/Misc Property)
CITY OF MONTICELLO
% of Total Direct Total
Total Tax Rate Market Value
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Note 1: The fiscal year is for the values in the year levied for taxes collectible in the following year.
Note 2: *Tax exempt property values are not included in total net tax capacity value.
Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties.
42.458 $
1,243,461,100
Real Property
1,282,400,700
46.191
1,245,407,600
45.822
1,188,222,100
Residential
% of
Commercial
% of
Personal
% of
Ag/Misc
Year
Property
Total
Property
Total
Property
Total
Property
2007
$ 6,929,517
42.8%
$ 8,913,821
55.0%
$ 177,822
1.1%
$ 183,695
2008
7,443,331
43.0%
9,455,666
54.6%
176,289
1.0%
236,789
2009
7,506,973
41.8%
9,966,873
55.5%
174,223
1.0%
299,191
2010
6,165,704
35.4%
10,793,836
62.0%
189,563
1.1%
251,177
2011
5,307,260
31.9%
10,897,898
65.5%
194,825
1.2%
229,016
2012
4,611,403
23.6%
14,538,165
74.3%
235,633
1.2%
194,492
2013
4,824,117
25.4%
13,793,916
72.5%
239,129
1.3%
164,609
2014
5,408,138
21.9%
18,818,097
76.4%
235,713
1.0%
184,750
2015
5,861,759
22.1%
20,316,219
76.4%
238,732
0.9%
164,516
2016
6,505,649
23.0%
21,386,874
75.6%
248,668
0.9%
166,437
$30
$25
$20
N
C
° $15
$10
$5
$-
2007
Total
Taxable Net
% of Tax Capacity
Total Value *
1.1% $ 16,204,855
1.4% 17,312,075
1.7% 17,947,260
1.4% 17,400,280
1.4% 16,628,999
1.0% 19,579,693
0.9% 19,021,771
0.7% 24,646,698
0.6% 26,581,226
0.6% 28,307,628
Total Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value
(Excludes Personal and Ag/Misc Property)
CITY OF MONTICELLO
% of Total Direct Total
Total Tax Rate Market Value
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Note 1: The fiscal year is for the values in the year levied for taxes collectible in the following year.
Note 2: *Tax exempt property values are not included in total net tax capacity value.
Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties.
42.458 $
1,243,461,100
46.942
1,282,400,700
46.191
1,245,407,600
45.822
1,188,222,100
46.729
1,106, 541,400
49.773
1,219,719,700
42.234
1,201,075,800
44.709
1,513, 570,400
35.737
1,712,125,200
34.471
1,828,437,600
Residential
■ Commercial
Net Tax
Capacity as a
Percentage of
Market Value
1.3%
1.3%
1.4%
1.5%
1.5%
1.6%
1.6%
1.6%
1.6%
1.5%
94
Property Tax Rates - All Direct and Overlapping Governments
Last Ten Fiscal Years
60
40
w
M
m
s 20
Overlapping Taxing Districts
Monticello
School
District #882
23.15
25.25
26.08
24.95
27.03
28.26
26.23
28.27
22.88
20.86
Property Tax Rates
For the three highest taxing authorities
0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Note 1: Information reflects total tax rates levied by each entity. Tax rates are expressed in terms of "net tax capacity." A
property's tax capacity is determined by multiplying its taxable market value by a state determined class rate. Class
rates vary by property type and change periodically based on state legislation. Components of the direct rate are not
readily available.
Source: Wright County
Special
Districts
2.95
2.52
2.07
1.75
1.50
1.24
0.61
1.08
(Wright
District
#882
City
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Total (1)
Direct and
Overlapping
99.27
106.36
106.91
108.34
114.57
122.72
113.36
116.43
99.21
96.38
95
City
Wright
Year
of Monticello
County
2007
42.46
30.71
2008
46.94
31.65
2009
46.19
32.57
2010
45.82
35.82
2011
46.73
39.31
2012
49.77
43.45
2013
42.23
44.29
2014
44.71
43.45
2015
35.74
40.59
2016
34.47
39.97
60
40
w
M
m
s 20
Overlapping Taxing Districts
Monticello
School
District #882
23.15
25.25
26.08
24.95
27.03
28.26
26.23
28.27
22.88
20.86
Property Tax Rates
For the three highest taxing authorities
0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Note 1: Information reflects total tax rates levied by each entity. Tax rates are expressed in terms of "net tax capacity." A
property's tax capacity is determined by multiplying its taxable market value by a state determined class rate. Class
rates vary by property type and change periodically based on state legislation. Components of the direct rate are not
readily available.
Source: Wright County
Special
Districts
2.95
2.52
2.07
1.75
1.50
1.24
0.61
1.08
(Wright
District
#882
City
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Total (1)
Direct and
Overlapping
99.27
106.36
106.91
108.34
114.57
122.72
113.36
116.43
99.21
96.38
95
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Property Tax Levies and Collections
Last Ten Fiscal Years
PROPERTY TAXES
Collected within the
Total Collections
Total Tax
Year of the Net Levy
Collections in
to Date
Abatements
Total Uncollected
Fiscal
Levy for
Tax
Net
% of
Subsequent
% of
and
% of
Year
Fiscal Year
Credits
Levy
Amount
Net Levy
Years
Amount
Net Levy
Adjustments
Amount
Net Levy
2007
$ 6,499,914
$ 261,362
$ 6,238,552
$ 6,044,463
96.9%
$ 170,880
$ 6,215,343
99.6%
$ (21,679)
$ 1,530
0.0%
2008
7,600,189
267,056
7,333,133
7,118,136
97.1%
173,727
7,291,863
99.4%
(39,184)
2,086
0.0%
2009
7,750,119
263,587
7,486,532
7,237,730
96.7%
212,481
7,450,211
99.5%
(32,806)
3,515
0.0%
2010
7,648,269
278,930
7,369,339
7,155,141
97.1%
183,034
7,338,175
99.6%
(26,695)
4,469
0.1%
2011
7,677,351
293,075
7,384,276
7,178,807
97.2%
178,326
7,357,133
99.6%
(19,706)
7,437
0.1%
2012
7,850,042
-
7,850,042
7,759,174
98.8%
28,205
7,787,379
99.2%
(57,415)
5,248
0.1%
2013
7,900,724
7,900,724
7,827,356
99.1%
36,950
7,864,306
99.5%
(33,113)
3,305
0.0%
2014
8,151,086
8,151,086
8,109,373
99.5%
31,225
8,140,598
99.9%
(7,012)
3,476
0.0%
2015
8,535,565
8,535,565
8,498,745
99.6%
18,906
8,517,651
99.8%
(12,524)
5,390
0.1%
2016
9,205,700
9,205,700
9,177,787
99.7%
-
9,177,787
99.7%
(3,572)
24,341
0.3%
TAX INCREMENTS
Collected within the
Total Collections
Total Tax
Year of the Net Levy
Collections in
to Date
Abatements
Total Uncollected
Fiscal
Levy for
Tax
Net
% of
Subsequent
% of
and
% of
Year
Fiscal Year
Credits
Levy
Amount
Net Levy
Years
Amount
Net Levy
Adjustments
Amount
Net Levy
2007
$ 889,262
$
$ 889,262
$ 836,397
94.1%
$ 1,222
$ 837,619
94.2%
$ (51,643)
$
0.0%
2008
1,191,177
1,191,177
1,184,402
99.4%
4,874
1,189,276
99.8%
(1,901)
0.0%
2009
1,247,605
1,247,605
1,205,582
96.6%
39,200
1,244,782
99.8%
(2,823)
0.0%
2010
1,193,383
1,193,383
1,144,243
95.9%
36,309
1,180,552
98.9%
(12,831)
0.0%
2011
1,071,686
1,071,686
1,044,309
97.4%
25,742
1,070,051
99.8%
(1,635)
0.0%
2012
955,039
955,039
953,400
99.8%
-
953,400
99.8%
(1,639)
0.0%
2013
971,745
971,745
970,071
99.8%
-
970,071
99.8%
(1,674)
0.0%
2014
869,425
869,425
869,339
100.0%
60
869,399
100.0%
(26)
0.0%
2015
729,130
729,130
727,558
99.8%
-
727,558
99.8%
(1,572)
0.0%
2016
668,351
668,351
668,351
100.0%
668,351
100.0%
0.0%
Source: Wright County
M
Principal Property Taxpayers
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
$ 853,077,700 $ 17,047,664 64.1%
(1) The market value and taxable net tax capacity value is for taxes levied in 2015, which are payable in 2016
Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties
CITY OF MONTICELLO
2007
Taxable Net Tax
Market Value Capacity Value Rank
$ 255,253,800 5,097,197 1
12,381,800 246,886 2
5,692,600 113,102 5
Percentage of
Total Net Tax
Capacity Value
36.6%
1.8%
0.8%
15,438,200
157,844
2016
1.1%
7,142,000
140,102
4
1.0%
5,291,000
Percentage of
6
(1)
Taxable Net Tax
101,174
Total Net Tax
Taxpayer
Market Value
Capacity Value
Rank
Capacity Value
Xcel Energy (Northern States)
$ 795,999,400
$ 15,913,229
1
59.9%
Walmart Real Estate Bus Trust
10,520,000
209,650
2
0.8%
Target Corporation
10,120,400
201,658
3
0.8%
CentraCare Medical Center (New River)
7,444,000
148,880
4
0.6%
Home Depot USA, Inc.
6,720,700
133,664
5
0.5%
Muller Family Theatres
5,401,300
106,895
6
0.4%
AX TC Retail, LP
5,154,900
101,598
7
0.4%
Tapper's Holdings, LLC
3,956,800
77,636
8
0.3%
WSI Industries Inc.
3,900,100
77,252
9
0.3%
Minnegasco Inc.
3,860,100
77,202
10
0.3%
Ocello LLC
Individual
Individuals
Gould Brothers Chev, LLP
Individual
Monticello Washington Assoc
Palf Co.
$ 853,077,700 $ 17,047,664 64.1%
(1) The market value and taxable net tax capacity value is for taxes levied in 2015, which are payable in 2016
Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties
CITY OF MONTICELLO
2007
Taxable Net Tax
Market Value Capacity Value Rank
$ 255,253,800 5,097,197 1
12,381,800 246,886 2
5,692,600 113,102 5
Percentage of
Total Net Tax
Capacity Value
36.6%
1.8%
0.8%
15,438,200
157,844
3
1.1%
7,142,000
140,102
4
1.0%
5,291,000
105,070
6
0.8%
5,096,200
101,174
7
0.7%
5,012,100
98,762
8
0.7%
4,592,300
91,096
9
0.7%
4,715,400
82,758
10
0.6%
$ 320,615,400
$ 6,233,991
44.7%
M
Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Year
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
% of
Residential Total
$ 467,672,488 71.3%
409,879,658 69.0%
430,263,791 75.0%
376,687,840 67.1%
348,580,072 66.0%
426,358,402 69.0%
383,079,041 68.8%
328,835,772 68.2%
325,188,041 68.1%
329,068,876 67.7%
CITY OF MONTICELLO
$700
$600
$500
c $400
0
$300
$200
$100
$0
2007 2008
Source: City of Monticello utility billing department
Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
■ Government
■ Industrial
Commercial
■ Residential
M
Total
% of
% of
% of
Water
% of
Commercial
Total
Industrial
Total
Government
Total
Sold
Total
$ 91,517,828
14.0%
$ 49,035,750
7.5%
$ 47,703,225
7.3%
$ 655,929,291
100.0%
84,234,653
14.2%
47,790,000
8.0%
52,154,498
8.8%
594,058,809
100.0%
69,825,753
12.2%
38,713,057
6.8%
34,601,796
6.0%
573,404,397
100.0%
90,001,208
16.0%
47,225,176
8.4%
47,227,405
8.4%
561,141,629
100.0%
84,194,027
15.9%
50,971,196
9.7%
44,219,755
8.4%
527,965,050
100.0%
97,281,410
15.7%
46,654,712
7.5%
47,866,428
7.7%
618,160,952
100.0%
85,819,687
15.4%
45,954,136
8.2%
42,206,803
7.6%
557,059,667
100.0%
79,370,922
16.5%
38,308,124
7.9%
35,566,000
7.4%
482,080,818
100.0%
76,283,322
16.0%
38,897,216
8.1%
37,005,919
7.8%
477,374,498
100.0%
77,795,226
16.0%
42,407,860
8.7%
36,647,583
7.5%
485,919,545
100.0%
$700
$600
$500
c $400
0
$300
$200
$100
$0
2007 2008
Source: City of Monticello utility billing department
Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
■ Government
■ Industrial
Commercial
■ Residential
M
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Water and Sewage Utility Rates
Last Ten Fiscal Years
N/A - Not Available
Source: City of Monticello utility billing department
0
Water
Sewage
Residential
Commercial
Rate Tier 1
Rate Tier 2
Rate Tier 3
Rate Tier 4
Rate Tier 1
Rate Tier 2
Rate Tier 3
Rate Tier 4
Rate Tier 1
Rate Tier 1
Base Rate
501-4,000
4,001-13,369
Over 13,369
Base Rate
501-4,000
4,001-13,369
Over 13,369
Base Rate
Over 500
Fiscal
First 500
per 100
per 100
per 100
First 500
per 100
per 100
per 100
First 500
per 100
Year
Cubic Feet
Cubic Feet
Cubic Feet
Cubic Feet
Cubic Feet
Cubic Feet
Cubic Feet
Cubic Feet
Cubic Feet
Cubic Feet
2007 $
10.26 $
0.62
$ 0.71
N/A $
10.26 $
0.62
N/A
N/A
$ 11.96
$ 2.15
2008
11.91
0.74
0.84
N/A
11.91
0.74
N/A
N/A
13.75
2.47
2009
12.40
0.78
0.88
N/A
12.40
0.78
N/A
N/A
14.45
2.60
2010
13.00
0.85
0.95
N/A
14.75
0.95
N/A
N/A
15.15
2.75
2011
14.30
0.95
1.10
1.20
14.30
0.95
1.10
1.20
16.75
3.00
2012
15.44
1.03
1.19
1.30
15.44
1.03
1.19
1.30
18.76
3.36
2013
17.00
1.13
1.31
1.43
17.00
1.13
1.31
1.43
20.65
3.70
2014
17.00
1.13
1.31
1.43
17.00
1.13
1.31
1.43
20.65
3.70
2015
17.85
1.19
1.38
1.50
17.85
1.19
1.38
1.50
21.69
3.89
2016
18.85
1.22
1.41
1.50
18.85
1.22
1.41
1.50
22.69
3.97
N/A - Not Available
Source: City of Monticello utility billing department
0
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Governmental activities
General obligation bonds
Special assessment
Other
Tax increment
Net premium (discount)
Total GO bonds
Notes
Certificates of indebtedness
Total general obligation debt
Non -general obligation bonds
Revenue
Contract for deed
Total governmental activites
Business -type activities
General obligation
revenue bonds
Non -general obligation
Revenue bonds
PFA loans
Net premium (discount)
Total business -type activities
CITY OF MONTICELLO
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$ 28,415,000 $ 24,075,000 $ 21,535,000 $ 21,320,000 $ 29,490,000 $ 26,625,000 $13,010,000 $12,203,653 $11,689,653 $12,730,000
7,132,903 15,737,903 12,822,903 11,531,903 10,196,903 8,877,403 7,506,653 10,487,000 9,563,000 7,686,000
680,000 575,000 470,000 - - - - - - -
691,438 651,542 631,516 572,079 818,803 744,748 265,320 67,350 190,196 159,266
36,919,341 41,039,445 35,459,419 33,423,982 40,505,706 36,247,151 20,781,973 22,758,003 21,442,849 20,575,266
9,515,592 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 445,000 385,000 325,000 265,000
46,434,933 41,039,445 35,459,419 33,423,982 40,505,706 36,247,151 21,226,973 23,143,003 21,767,849 20,840,266
6,157,974 5,742,098 5,209,011 4,612,454 3,690,898 2,739,341 1,782,784 985,000
664,293 564,293 - - - - - - - -
$ 53,257,200 $ 47,345,836 $ 40,668,430 $ 38,036,436 $ 44,196,604 $ 38,986,492 $ 23,009,757 $ 24,128,003 $ 21,767,849 $ 20,840,266
$ 907,097 $ 907,097 $ 837,097 $ 747,097 $ 654,097 $ 568,597 $ 3,479,347 $ 3,206,347 $ 2,930,347 $ 2,460,000
26,445,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 - -
- - - - - - - 615,268 1,927,850
14,364 (502,517) (479,980) (457,441) (434,904) (412,366) (360,211) 31,941 30,339 27,354
$ 921,461 $ 26,849,580 $ 26,802,117 $ 26,734,656 $ 26,664,193 $ 26,601,231 $ 29,564,136 $ 3,238,288 $ 3,575,954 $ 4,415,204
Total primary government $ 54,178,661 $ 74,195,416 $ 67,470,547 $ 64,771,092 $ 70,860,797 $ 65,587,723 $ 52,573,893 $ 27,366,291 $ 25,343,803 $ 25,255,470
% of personal income (1) 14.3% 18.9% 17.6% 15.8% 16.8% 13.7% 10.5% 5.1% 4.5% 4.3%
Per capita debt (1) $ 4,815 $ 6,528 $ 5,879 $ 5,632 $ 5,554 $ 5,071 $ 4,055 $ 2,106 $ 1,931 $ 1,899
(1) See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics.
Note: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements
100
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Ratios of Net General Obligation Bonded Debt Outstanding
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(1) Does not include revenue bonds.
(2) See the Schedule of Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property for the estimated actual market value.
(3) See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics.
Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements.
101
Percentage of
Less Amounts
Estimated
General
Available
Actual Market
Obligation
in Debt
Value of
Year
Bonds (1)
Service Fund
Total
Property (2)
Per Capita (3)
2007
$ 37,826,438
$ 18,520,552
$ 19,305,886
1.55%
$ 1,716
2008
41,946,542
9,936,332
32,010,210
2.50%
2,816
2009
36,296,516
2,346,286
33,950,230
2.73%
2,958
2010
34,171,079
2,363,382
31,807,697
2.68%
2,766
2011
41,159, 803
12, 727,140
28,432,663
2.57%
2,228
2012
36,815,748
12,952,896
23,862,852
1.96%
1,845
2013
24,706,320
2,750,079
21,956,241
1.83%
1,694
2014
26,349,350
3,919,070
22,430,280
1.48%
1,726
2015
24,728,535
5,382,214
19,346,321
1.13%
1,474
2016
23,327,620
3,543,551
19,784,069
1.08%
1,488
(1) Does not include revenue bonds.
(2) See the Schedule of Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property for the estimated actual market value.
(3) See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics.
Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements.
101
Legal Debt Margin Information
Last Ten Fiscal Years
CITY OF MONTICELLO
2013 2014 2015 2016
$35,671,296 $45,407,112 $51,363,756 $ 54,853,128
6,200,000 10,872,000 9,888,000 7,951,000
$29,471,296 $34,535,112 $41,475,756 $ 46,902,128
17.4% 23.9% 19.3%
Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2016
Market value
Debt limit (3% of market value)
Debt applicable to limit
General obligation bonds 23,141,000
Less amounts for general obligation bonds
not subject to debt limit (15,190,000)
Total net debt applicable to limit
Legal debt margin
14.5%
$ 1,828,437,600
$ 54,853,128
7,951,000
$ 46,902,128
Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. Market value data provided in Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable
Properties.
Note: All Minnesota municipalities (counties, cities, towns, and school districts) are subject to statutory "net debt" limitations under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
§ 475.53. Under this provision, beginning with issues having a settlement date after June 30, 2008, the state of Minnesota increased the legal debt limit from 2 percent to 3 percent of the city's
taxable market value.
102
Fiscal Year
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Legal debt limit
$23,203,682
$ 37,303,833
$38,074,842
$35,646,663
$33,196,242
$36,591,591
Total net debt
applicable to
debt limit
6,100,000
6,180,000
5,585,000
4,985,000
4,365,000
3,795,000
Legal debt margin
$17,103,682
$31,123,833
$32,489,842
$30,661,663
$28,831,242
$32,796,591
Total net debt
applicable to
debt limit as a
percentage
of debt limit
26.3%
16.6%
14.7%
14.0%
13.1%
10.4%
CITY OF MONTICELLO
2013 2014 2015 2016
$35,671,296 $45,407,112 $51,363,756 $ 54,853,128
6,200,000 10,872,000 9,888,000 7,951,000
$29,471,296 $34,535,112 $41,475,756 $ 46,902,128
17.4% 23.9% 19.3%
Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2016
Market value
Debt limit (3% of market value)
Debt applicable to limit
General obligation bonds 23,141,000
Less amounts for general obligation bonds
not subject to debt limit (15,190,000)
Total net debt applicable to limit
Legal debt margin
14.5%
$ 1,828,437,600
$ 54,853,128
7,951,000
$ 46,902,128
Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. Market value data provided in Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable
Properties.
Note: All Minnesota municipalities (counties, cities, towns, and school districts) are subject to statutory "net debt" limitations under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
§ 475.53. Under this provision, beginning with issues having a settlement date after June 30, 2008, the state of Minnesota increased the legal debt limit from 2 percent to 3 percent of the city's
taxable market value.
102
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt
As of December 31, 2016
Estimated
Net percentage Amount
bonded debt applicable applicable to
Jurisdiction outstanding (1) to city (2) city
DIRECT DEBT:
City of Monticello $ 20,840,266 100.0% $ 20,840,266
OVERLAPPING DEBT:
I.S.D. 882 45, 215, 000 76.3% 34,499, 045
Wright County 59,935,000 18.8% 11,267,780
Total Overlapping Debt 45,766,825
Total direct and overlapping debt $ 66,607,091
(1) Gross bonded debt outstanding.
(2) The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using taxable assessed property values. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the
portion of the government's taxable assessed value that is within the City's boundaries and dividing it by the government's total taxable assessed value.
Note: Overlapping governments are those that coincide, at least in part, with the geographic boundaries of the City. This schedule estimates the portion of the outstanding
debt of those overlapping governments that is borne by the residents and businesses of the City. This process recognizes that, when considering the government's
ability to issue and repay long-term debt, the entire debt burden borne by the residents and businesses should be taken into account. However, this does not imply
that every taxpaver is a resident and, therefore, responsible for repavinq the debt of each overlappinq qovernment.
Source: The Wright County auditor provided the debt outstanding and estimated applicable percentages for the school district and county.
103
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of General Obligation Revenue Bond Coverage
Last Four Fiscal Years
Sewaae Fund:
Net Revenue
Gross
Operating
Available for
Debt Service Requirements (3)
Year
Revenues (1)
Expenses(2)
Debt Service
Principal
Interest
Total
Coverage
2013
$ 2,006,718
$ 1,476,418
$ 530,300
$ -
$ -
$ -
-
2014
2,081,660
1,570,197
511,463
273,000
91,963
364,963
140.1%
2015
2,083,122
1,479,157
603,965
276,000
84,158
360,158
167.7%
2016
2,223,252
1,411,831
811,421
570,830
78,002
648,832
125.1%
(1) Total revenues does not include investment earnings.
(2) Total operating expenses excluding depreciation.
(3) The first year of bond payments is 2014. Schedule excludes telecommunications bonds. No other revenue bonds existed before 2013.
Source: Finance Department
104
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Demographic and Economic Statistics
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Notes/sources:
(1) 2010 U.S. Bureau of Census; 2006-2009 and 2011-2015 Minnesota State Demographic Center population estimates.
(2) Annual average unemployment provided by the Minnesota Department of Employment & Economic Development.
(3) ISD No. 882 enrollment information was obtained from the district audit report. The enrollment information is based on the resident ADMs (average daily
membership) served.
(4) This estimated personal income number is calculated by taking the per capita personal income and multiplying it by the city's population. Also see note (5)
regarding the per capita personal income figures.
(5) Per capita personal income data is provided by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Monticello's estimates are based on Wright County information. Wright County,
where Monticello is located, is the smallest, relevant statistical tracking area. Data is subject o annual revisions by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
105
Per
Estimated
Capita
Unemployment
School
Personal
Personal
Year
Population (1)
rate (2)
Enrollment (3)
Income (4)
Income (5)
2007
11,253
4.8%
3,910
$ 379,102,317
$ 34,374
2008
11,366
5.7%
3,921
391, 740,556
36,162
2009
11,476
7.9%
3,928
384,446,000
37,550
2010
11,501
8.8%
3,932
410,252,171
35,715
2011
12,759
7.5%
4,011
422,820,501
36,212
2012
12,935
6.2%
4,044
477,596,640
38,517
2013
12,964
4.6%
4,016
502, 964,308
40,127
2014
12,993
3.8%
4,089
531,634,581
40,917
2015
13,125
3.7%
4,100
557,116,875
42,447
2016
13,299
4.3%
4,027
586, 525,797
44,103
Notes/sources:
(1) 2010 U.S. Bureau of Census; 2006-2009 and 2011-2015 Minnesota State Demographic Center population estimates.
(2) Annual average unemployment provided by the Minnesota Department of Employment & Economic Development.
(3) ISD No. 882 enrollment information was obtained from the district audit report. The enrollment information is based on the resident ADMs (average daily
membership) served.
(4) This estimated personal income number is calculated by taking the per capita personal income and multiplying it by the city's population. Also see note (5)
regarding the per capita personal income figures.
(5) Per capita personal income data is provided by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Monticello's estimates are based on Wright County information. Wright County,
where Monticello is located, is the smallest, relevant statistical tracking area. Data is subject o annual revisions by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
105
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Principal Employers
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
Source: City of Monticello 2016A Bond Statement and 2007 Bond Statement
(1) The city estimates its workforce by using the city's percentage of total county population and multiplying that number by the county's total workforce.
106
2016
2007
Percentage of
Percentage of
Total City
Total City
Employer
Employees
Rank
Employment (1)
Employees
Rank
Employment (1)
Xcel Energy (Northern States)
700
1
9.9%
422
3
6.8%
ISD No. 882 (Monticello)
544
2
7.7%
455
2
7.4%
CentraCare Medical Center (New River)
500
3
7.1%
515
1
8.3%
Cargill Kitchen Solutions (Sunny Fresh)
450
4
6.4%
396
4
6.4%
Wal-Mart Supercenter
325
5
4.6%
325
5
5.3%
Cub Foods
180
6
2.6%
122
9
2.0%
Ultra Machine Corporation
173
7
2.5%
130
8
2.1%
Home Depot
160
8
2.3%
City of Monticello
150
9
2.1%
151
6
2.4%
WSI Industries, Inc.
100
10
1.4%
Denny Hecker Monticello
150
7
2.4%
Monticello Clinic
98
10
1.6%
3,282
46.5%
2,764
44.8%
Source: City of Monticello 2016A Bond Statement and 2007 Bond Statement
(1) The city estimates its workforce by using the city's percentage of total county population and multiplying that number by the county's total workforce.
106
CITY OF MONTICELLO
City Government Employees by Function/Program
Last Ten Fiscal Years
107
Fiscal Year
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Employees by function
General Fund
General government
8.60
9.60
9.60
11.00
11.00
11.00
11.00
12.50
12.50
13.50
Public Safety
Building Official
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
Public works
Engineering
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Maintenance(1)
21.50
21.50
19.50
19.50
19.00
19.00
19.00
18.50
18.50
18.50
Culture and recreation
Parks
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Community development
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Special Revenue Funds
Culture and recreation
Community center -FT
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
7.50
7.50
7.50
Community center-PT(2)
36.50
36.50
36.50
36.50
36.50
36.50
36.50
36.50
36.50
36.50
Enterprise Funds
Sewer/water
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
Deputy registrar(3)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Liquor store
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
11.50
11.50
11.50
FiberNet(4)
-
-
6.00
11.00
11.50
11.50
8.50
8.50
8.50
-
Total
106.60
107.60
111.60
118.00
118.00
118.00
113.00
115.00
117.00
109.50
Employees by fund type
General Fund
43.10
44.10
42.10
43.50
43.00
43.00
41.00
42.00
43.00
44.00
Special Revenue Funds
44.50
44.50
44.50
44.50
44.50
44.50
44.50
44.00
44.00
44.00
Enterprise Funds
19.00
19.00
25.00
30.00
30.50
30.50
27.50
29.00
30.00
21.50
106.60
107.60
111.60
118.00
118.00
118.00
113.00
115.00
117.00
109.50
Source: City of Monticello human resources
department
FT = Full-time PT = Part-time
(1) Includes seasonal public works
(2) Years 2007-2013 were estimated
2014 levels
as data was not previously tracked.
(3) Prior to 2013, the deputy registrar function was included with
general government. Prior years
were restated.
(4) Management and operations were contracted
beginning July
1, 2016.
107
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Operating Indicators by Function
Last Ten Fiscal Years
108
Fiscal Year
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Function
Fire
Calls for service
317
395
375
282
284
203
235
264
251
262
Public works
Salt (tons)
274
474
475
521
445
300
475
385
534
370
Sand (tons)
347
611
615
710
547
335
325
600
285
202
Crack sealant (pounds)
14,200
18,150
15,000
23,580
11,384
1,492
25,739
23,282
29,580
49,039
Asphalt repairs (tons of asphalt)
330
200
200
200
253
220
225
190
293
220
Culture and recreation
Shade trees planted
384
410
425
150
140
220
275
270
257
280
Diseased trees removed
n/a
868
200
180
113
205
71
46
208
60
Trails maintained (miles)
n/a
17
17
17
17
17
17
18
18
20
Community center users
168,923
186,429
186,279
183,527
190,014
175,272
211,234
204,134
199,228
197,523
Program sales
$ 88,412
$ 129,339
$ 149,829
$ 167,723
$
168,159
$ 162,227
$ 192,708
$ 184,125
$ 213,924
$ 193,628
Rental revenue
$ 139,096
$ 136,547
$ 127,612
$ 184,913
$
154,962
$ 149,733
$ 163,329
$ 150,964
$ 154,938
$ 168,353
Economic development
Permits issued
962
3,681
879
495
372
632
659
721
768
802
Permit valuation
$45,917,000
$45,950,000
$11,630,000
$ 9,033,078
$
5,333,124
$12,285,873
$15,821,223
$19,714,895
$36,242,742
$59,426,683
New single-family dwellings
43
20
9
2
2
22
52
72
44
61
Water
Meters/remotes replaced
94
111
280
145
215
418
235
598
694
991
Curb box repairs (water valves)
50
75
200
200
200
100
100
100
100
100
Hydrant repair
175
175
175
175
430
300
300
203
430
250
Residential water gallons used
467,673,488
409,879,658
430,263,791
376,687,840
348,580,072
426,358,402
383,079,041
328,835,772
325,188,041
329,068,876
Avg. daily consumption (MG)
1.921
1.749
1.806
1.625
1.557
1.798
1.621
1.400
1.308
1.419
Max. daily gallons pumped (MG)
5.150
4.728
4.496
3.565
4.116
4.590
4.269
4.031
3.203
3.450
Sewer
Sewage flow (MG)
423
408
390
398
431
408
392
435
417
432
Thickened sludge (wet tons)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1,924
1,549
1,449
Thickened sludge (dry tons)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
264
236
216
Dry tons as % of wet tons
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
13.7%
15.2%
14.9%
Library
Items checked out
209,174
216,599
219,694
248,327
228,886
237,938
263,220
199,182
195,235
190,433
Programs offered
145
155
170
164
153
149
173
169
167
212
Program participants
3,537
3,869
4,100
3,604
3,807
3,761
3,773
3,788
3,919
4,306
(continued)
108
Operating Indicators by Function
Last Ten Fiscal Years (continued)
Fiber optics
Customers
Service subscriptions
TV customers
Phone customers
Internet customers
Liquor store
Transactions
Average liquor sale transaction
Beer sales
Liquor sales
Wine sales
Gross profit margin % - beer
Gross profit margin % - liquor
Gross profit margin % - wine
Deputy registrar (DMV)
Motor vehicle transactions
DNR transactions
Game/fish transactions
Drivers licenses transactions
Total transactions
Dealerships serviced
Net revenue per transaction
CITY OF MONTICELLO
N/A = Not Available
MG = Millions of Gallons
Note: Indicators are not available for the general government function.
Sources: Various city departments
109
Fiscal Year
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1,539
1,574
1,630
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2,755
2,656
2,589
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
813
714
641
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
582
518
461
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1,360
1,424
1,487
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
229,236
237,535
235,901
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$ 21.90
$ 22.42
$ 22.39
n/a
$ 2,066,537
$ 2,187,948
$ 2,289,801
$ 2,328,735
$ 2,483,194
$ 2,539,168
$ 2,604,942
$ 2,763,478
$ 2,768,394
n/a
$ 1,129,351
$ 1,214,817
$ 1,251,448
$ 1,343,109
$ 1,396,521
$ 1,506,776
$ 1,546,118
$ 1,634,198
$ 1,624,908
n/a
$ 492,183
$ 575,521
$ 657,562
$ 748,908
$ 812,832
$ 860,817
$ 868,779
$ 927,732
$ 889,082
n/a
20.7%
15.7%
20.4%
19.1%
20.3%
22.5%
21.4%
25.6%
21.1%
n/a
23.9%
26.8%
29.6%
28.0%
29.3%
27.7%
30.3%
29.8%
29.0%
n/a
17.0%
20.2%
26.8%
28.5%
31.4%
29.7%
30.7%
31.5%
32.5%
40,950
45,595
48,000
51,250
54,814
56,211
55,261
60,051
64,927
67,508
5,580
5,913
5,646
5,982
5,616
5,465
5,727
5,949
5,914
6,318
167
235
250
156
325
509
445
433
387
600
n/a
n/a
450
605
579
814
951
1,462
1,294
1,465
46,697
51,743
54,346
57,993
61,334
62,999
62,384
67,895
72,522
75,891
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
19
19
19
21
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$ 1.71
$ 2.75
$ 2.68
$ 2.91
$ 3.02
$ 3.05
N/A = Not Available
MG = Millions of Gallons
Note: Indicators are not available for the general government function.
Sources: Various city departments
109
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Assets Statistics by Function
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Note: No capital asset indicators are available for the general government and economic development functions.
Note: The city contributed jointly -owned land at the Bertram Chain of Lakes to Wright County in 2015.
Source: Various city departments
110
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Function
Public safety
Fire
Fire stations in service
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Number of volunteers
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Public works
Streets (miles)
67.6
67.6
68.0
68.0
68.0
68.0
68.0
68.0
68.0
68.0
Recreation and culture
Parks acreage
-
120
180
509
635
635
696
860
326
367
Parks
19
20
20
28
28
28
28
30
30
30
Park buildings
9
10
11
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
Community center (sq. ft.)
81,000
81,000
81,000
81,000
81,000
81,000
82,000
82,000
82,000
82,000
Water
Fire hydrants
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
Note: No capital asset indicators are available for the general government and economic development functions.
Note: The city contributed jointly -owned land at the Bertram Chain of Lakes to Wright County in 2015.
Source: Various city departments
110
Ir-
O�Kw'-Jo--
43k
-0
lojo,
Arm,
Ab& 4p
*q%w
V
VL 4
Ilk .0
09
..A
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Special Purpose Audit Reports on
Single Audit,
Internal Controls, and
Compliance With Laws and Regulations
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Table of Contents
Page
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on
Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements
Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 2-3
Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program;
Report on Internal Control Over Compliance; and Report on the Schedule of
Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance 4-6
Independent Auditor's Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance
7
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 8-11
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Federal Federal
Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor/Program Title CFDA No. Expenditures
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Passed through Minnesota Public Facilities Authority
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds 66.458 $ 1,413,064
U.S. Department of Transportation
Passed through Minnesota Department of Transportation
Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 579,445
Total federal awards $ 1,992,509
Note 1: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. The information
in this schedule is presented in accordance with both OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments,
and Nonprofit Organizations and the OMB's Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards, when applicable. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may
differ from the amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the City's basic financial statements.
Note 2: All pass-through entities listed above use the same CFDA numbers as the federal grantors to identify these grants,
and have not assigned any additional identifying numbers.
Note 3: The City did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate.
-1-
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PRINCIPAIS
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA KR
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
C E RT I F I E D PUBLIC Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
ACCOUNTANTS Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN
FA400 7m - [ ./_YY`__[e��]%�1 �1► �I�[�117�_Y_I�[e;�.y11I:�� 7D I
To the City Council and Management
City of Monticello, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental
activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of
the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the
related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements,
and have issued our report thereon dated June 20, 2017.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City's internal control
over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do
not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or
detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination
of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the City's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A
significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less
severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with
governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this
section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material
weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any
deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses
may exist that have not been identified.
(continued)
-2-
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free from
material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the
determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those
provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The
results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be
reported under Government Auditing Standards.
PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance
and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal
control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control and compliance. Accordingly,
this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
WW,07,, WakAr,
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 20, 2017
-3-
M KR
CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR
PRINCIPALS
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA
EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM, REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL
OVER COMPLIANCE, AND REPORT ON THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES
OF FEDERAL AWARDS REOUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE
To the City Council and Management
City of Monticello, Minnesota
REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM
We have audited the City of Monticello, Minnesota's (the City) compliance with the types of compliance
requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget Compliance Supplement that could
have a direct and material effect on each of the City's major federal programs for the year ended
December 31, 2016. The City's major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor's results
section of the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs.
MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY
Management is responsible for compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions
of its federal awards applicable to its federal programs.
AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for each of the City's major federal programs
based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of
compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the
standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States; and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal
Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Those standards and the Uniform Guidance require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of
compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal
program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City's compliance
with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major
federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City's compliance.
(continued)
-4-
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
BASIS FOR QUALIFIED OPINION ON THE CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE
REVOLVING FUNDS
As described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs, the City did not comply
with requirements regarding Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds procurement
requirements, reported as finding 2016-001. Compliance with such requirements is necessary, in our
opinion, for the City to comply with the requirements applicable to that program.
QUALIFIED OPINION ON THE CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING
FUNDS
In our opinion, except for the noncompliance described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the
City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to on the
previous page that could have a direct and material effect on the Capitalization Grants for the Clean
Water State Revolving Funds Program for the year ended December 31, 2016.
CITY'S RESPONSE TO QUALIFIED OPINION
The City's response to the noncompliance finding identified in our audit is described in the accompanying
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. The City's response was not subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audit of compliance and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it.
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE
Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over
compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our
audit of compliance, we considered the City's internal control over compliance with the types of
requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program to determine the
auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on
compliance for each major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in
accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the
effectiveness of the City's internal control over compliance.
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over
compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a
federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a
deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal
program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in
internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over
compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material
weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged
with governance.
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first
paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over
compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any
deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, we
identified two deficiencies in internal control over compliance, as described in the accompanying
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs as items 2016-001 and 2016-002, that we consider to be
significant deficiencies.
(continued)
511
CITY'S RESPONSES TO FINDINGS
The City's responses to the internal control over compliance findings identified in our audit are described
in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. The City's responses were not
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of compliance and, accordingly, we express no
opinion on the responses.
PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our
testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the
Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
REPORT ON SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM
GUIDANCE
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each
major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the
City's basic financial statements. We issued our report thereon dated June 20, 2017, which contained
unmodified opinions on those financial statements. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming
opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the basic financial statements. The
accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented for purposes of additional
analysis as required by the Uniform Guidance and is not a required part of the basic financial statements.
Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the
underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information
has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain
additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying
accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial
statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
WW107" /'"( per.. " ��iJLtti� L[
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 20, 2017
-6-
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
M KR
CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE
To the City Council and Management
City of Monticello, Minnesota
PRINCIPAIS
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental
activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of
the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the
related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements,
and have issued our report thereon dated June 20, 2017.
MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE
The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding,
deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements,
miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our audit considered all of the listed categories.
In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to
comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities. However, our
audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had
we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City's
noncompliance with the above referenced provisions.
PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of
that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any
other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 20, 2017
-7-
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
Year Ended December 31, 2016
A. SUMMARY OF AUDIT RESULTS
This summary is formatted to provide federal granting agencies and pass-through agencies answers to
specific questions regarding the audit of federal awards.
Financial Statements
What type of auditor's report is issued? X Unmodified
Qualified
Adverse
Disclaimer
Internal control over financial reporting:
Material weakness(es) identified?
Yes
X
No
Significant deficiency(ies) identified?
Yes
X
None reported
Noncompliance material to the financial statements noted?
Yes
X
No
Federal Awards
Internal controls over major federal award programs:
Material weakness(es) identified?
Yes
X
No
Significant deficiency(ies) identified?
X Yes
None reported
Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for major programs?
Unmodified
X
Qualified
Adverse
Disclaimer
Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported
in accordance with the Uniform Guidance? X Yes No
Programs tested as major programs:
Program or Cluster CFDA No.
U.S. Environment Protection Agency
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds 66.458
Threshold for distinguishing between type A and B programs $ 750,000
Does the auditee qualify as a low-risk auditee? Yes X No
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (continued)
Year Ended December 31, 2016
B. FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS
None.
C. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE AND NONCOMPLIANCE -
CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS - CFDA NO. 66.458
2016-001 Internal Controls Over Compliance With Procurement Requirements
Criteria — 2 CFR § 1500.10 requires that if the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) is
satisfied with the qualifications and performance of the architect or engineer who provided
any or all of the facilities planning or design services for the Wastewater Treatment Works
Project, and wishes to retain that firm or individual during construction of the project, the
City may do so without further public notice and evaluation of qualifications, provided the
City follows one of three acceptable exceptions.
Condition — During our audit, we noted that the City did not obtain the necessary
Environment Protection Agency exception documentation in order to continue using the same
architect or engineer during construction under the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water
State Revolving Funds agreement.
Questioned Costs — None.
Context — The lack of exception documentation pertains to the Capitalization Grants for
Clean Water State Revolving Funds. This was not a statistically valid sample.
Repeat Finding — This is a current year finding only.
Cause — The City did not adequately document one of the acceptable exceptions for choosing
to use the same architect or engineer who provided facilities planning or design services and
for construction under the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds.
Effect — This could be viewed as a violation of the award agreement.
Recommendation — We recommend that the City review its internal control procedures
relating to procurement for the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds
to ensure proper compliance with this requirement in the future.
View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions — The City agrees with the
finding. The City is in the process of reviewing internal controls in place for procurement
requirements to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance in the future. The City has
separately issued a Corrective Action Plan related to this finding.
In
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (continued)
Year Ended December 31, 2016
C. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (CONTINUED)
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE - CAPITALIZATION GRANTS
FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS - CFDA NO. 66.458
2016-002 Internal Controls Over Compliance With Cash Management, Allowable Costs,
Procurement Standards, and Standards of Conduct for Conflicts of Interest
Criteria — 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) and (7) requires the City to have written cash management
procedures, which includes procedures for determining the allowability of costs in
accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E — Cost Principles. 2 CFR § 200.318(a) requires the
City to have written procurement procedures which reflect applicable federal law.
2 CFR § 200.318(c) and 48 CFR § 52.203-13 requires the City to have written standards of
conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of its employees in the
selection, award, and administration of contracts.
Condition — During our audit, we noted that the City did not have documented written
controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget's (OMB)
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal
Awards (Uniform Guidance) cash management, allowable costs, procurement standards, and
standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest.
Questioned Costs — None. Our testing did not indicate any instances of noncompliance.
Context — The lack of written controls pertains to the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water
State Revolving Funds. This was not a statistically valid sample.
Repeat Finding — This is a current year finding only.
Cause — This is the first year of implementation of the new Uniform Guidance requirements
for federal awards, and some internal control policies, including cash management, allowable
costs, procurement, and conflicts of interest were not updated to reflect the necessary
changes.
Effect — This could be viewed as a violation of the award agreement.
Recommendation — We recommend that the City review its internal control procedures
relating to cash management, allowable costs, procurement, and conflicts of interest for the
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds. The City should review the
new Uniform Guidance to obtain a better understanding of the new requirements and identify
any needed policy and procedure changes, in addition to those already referenced above. We
also recommend the City adopt written policies pertaining to cash management, allowable
costs, procurement, and conflicts of interest for the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water
State Revolving Funds.
-10-
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (continued)
Year Ended December 31, 2016
C. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (CONTINUED)
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE - CAPITALIZATION GRANTS
FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS - CFDA NO. 66.458 (CONTINUED)
2016-002 Internal Controls Over Compliance With Cash Management, Allowable Costs,
Procurement Standards, and Standards of Conduct for Conflicts of Interest
(continued)
View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions — The City agrees with the
finding. The City is in the process of reviewing and updating its written policies and
procedures relating to cash management, allowable costs, procurement, and conflict of
interest standards for its federal programs to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance in
the future. The City has separately issued a Corrective Action Plan related to this finding.
D. MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE FINDINGS
None.
-11-
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Corrective Action Plans and
Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings
Year Ended December 31, 2016
A. FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS
None.
B. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE AND NONCOMPLIANCE -
CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS - CFDA NO. 66.458
2016-001 Internal Controls Over Compliance With Procurement Requirements
Finding Summary
2 CFR § 1500.10 requires that if the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) is satisfied with
the qualifications and performance of the architect or engineer who provided any or all of the
facilities planning or design services for the Wastewater Treatment Works Project, and
wishes to retain that firm or individual during construction of the project, the City may do so
without further public notice and evaluation of qualifications, provided the City follows one
of three acceptable exceptions. During our audit, we noted that the City did not obtain the
necessary Environment Protection Agency exception documentation in order to continue
using the same architect or engineer during construction under the Capitalization Grants for
Clean Water State Revolving Funds agreement.
Corrective Action Plan
Actions Planned — The City is in the process of reviewing internal controls in place for
procurement requirements to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance in the future.
Official Responsible — The City's Finance Director.
Planned Completion Date — December 31, 2017.
Disagreement With or Explanation of Finding — The City agrees with this finding.
Plan to Monitor — The City's Finance Director will assure appropriate internal controls
and procedures are effectively implemented and followed for future federal grants.
-1-
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Corrective Action Plans and
Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings (continued)
Year Ended December 31, 2016
B. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (CONTINUED)
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE - CAPITALIZATION GRANTS
FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS - CFDA NO. 66.458
2016-002 Internal Controls Over Compliance With Cash Management, Allowable Costs,
Procurement Standards, and Standards of Conduct for Conflicts of Interest
Finding Summary
2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) and (7) requires the City to have written cash management
procedures, which includes procedures for determining the allowability of costs in
accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E — Cost Principles. 2 CFR 200.318(a) requires the City
to have written procurement procedures which reflect applicable federal law.
2 CFR § 200.318(c) and 48 CFR § 52.203-13 requires the City to have written standards of
conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of its employees in the
selection, award, and administration of contracts. The City did not have documented written
controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget's Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
(Uniform Guidance) cash management, allowable costs, procurement standards, and
standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest.
Corrective Action Plan
Actions Planned — The City is in the process of reviewing and updating its written
policies and procedures relating to cash management, allowable costs, procurement, and
standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest for its federal programs to ensure
compliance with Uniform Guidance in the future.
Official Responsible — The City's Finance Director.
Planned Completion Date — December 31, 2017.
Disagreement With or Explanation of Finding — The City agrees with this finding.
Plan to Monitor — The City's Finance Director will assure appropriate written internal
controls and procedures are updated and in place for future federal grants.
-2-
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Corrective Action Plans and
Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings (continued)
Year Ended December 31, 2016
C. MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE FINDINGS
None.
D. SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AUDIT FINDINGS
No findings were reported in the prior year.
-3-
Management Report
for
City of Monticello, Minnesota
December 31, 2016
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
M KR
CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS
To the City Council and Management
City of Monticello, Minnesota
PRINCIPALS
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA
We have prepared this management report in conjunction with our audit of the City of Monticello,
Minnesota's (the City) financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016. We have organized
this report into the following sections:
• Audit Summary
• Governmental Funds Overview
• Enterprise Funds Overview
• Government -Wide Financial Statements
• Legislative Updates
• Accounting and Auditing Updates
We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other
concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and
assistance extended to us during the course of our audit.
The purpose of this report is solely to provide those charged with governance of the City, management,
and those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process comments resulting
from our audit process and information relevant to city finances in Minnesota. Accordingly, this report is
not suitable for any other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 20, 2017
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
AUDIT SUMMARY
The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider
important or that is required to be communicated to the City Council, administration, or those charged
with governance of the City.
OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, AND TITLE 2 U.S. CODE OF FEDERAL
REGULATIONS (CFR) PART 200, UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES,
AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS (UNIFORM GUIDANCE
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each
major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements. Professional standards require that
we provide you with information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in
the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance, as well as
certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such
information to you verbally and in our audit engagement letter. Professional standards also require that we
communicate the following information related to our audit.
PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT
We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated
in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit.
AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS
Based on our audit of the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016:
• We have issued an unmodified opinion on the City's basic financial statements.
• We reported no deficiencies in the City's internal control over financial reporting that we
considered to be material weaknesses.
• The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance required to be reported under
Government Auditing Standards.
• We reported that the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is fairly stated, in all material
respects, in relation to the basic financial statements.
• The results of our tests noted one instance of noncompliance with requirements that could have a
direct and material effect on the City's major federal program:
o During our audit, we noted one instance of noncompliance with procurement
requirements in which the City did not obtain the necessary Environmental Protection
Agency exception documentation in order to continue use of the same architect or
engineer during construction under the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State
Revolving Funds agreement. This is also considered a significant deficiency in internal
controls as the City did not have adequate controls in place to ensure proper compliance
with these requirements.
-1-
We reported one additional matter involving the internal controls over compliance and its
operation that we consider to be significant deficiencies in our testing of major federal programs:
o During our audit, we noted that the City did not have documented written controls to
ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance
cash management, allowable costs, procurement, and conflict of interest standards.
• We reported no findings based on our testing of the City's compliance with Minnesota laws and
regulations.
GENERAL COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Inventory Reconciliation
The City operates its liquor store inventory on a perpetual basis and completes an annual inventory count
in January after year-end. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the City experienced a significant
write-down of inventory to reconcile to what was on hand in the count. The size of this adjustment has
increased over the last few years, causing us to have concerns that internal controls over inventory costing
are not operating effectively enough to mitigate material year-end adjustments. We recommend the City
review its policies and procedures over valuing and monitoring its inventory on a first -in first -out cost
basis, improve its internal controls over recording inventory values, and continue to monitor overall
inventory activity in the future to ensure inventory is properly recorded and valued at year-end.
Untimely Reporting to the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority
The City is required to submit a copy of its annual audit report to the public facilities authority within
30 days of the report date. We noted during our audit, that the audit report for the year ended
December 31, 2015 was not submitted until 80 days after the audit report date. We recommend the City
review its internal controls over grant agreements to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements of
all grants.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant
accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements.
No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during
the year ended December 31, 2016. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for
which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been
recognized in the financial statements in the proper period.
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are
based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about
future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the
financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ
significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were:
• Depreciation — Management's estimates of depreciation expense are based on the estimated
useful lives of the assets.
-2-
• Other Post -Employment Benefit (OPEB) and Pension Liabilities — These obligations are
calculated using actuarial methodologies described in Governmental Accounting Standards Board
(GASB) Statement Nos. 45 and 68. These actuarial calculations include significant assumptions,
including projected changes, healthcare insurance costs, investment returns, retirement ages,
proportionate share, and employee turnover.
• Land Held for Resale — These assets are stated at fair value based on management's estimates.
• Compensated Absences — Management's estimate is based on current rates of pay and sick leave
balances.
• Allowance for Doubtful Accounts — Management's estimate of the allowance for doubtful
accounts is based on historical revenues, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability
of individual accounts.
We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used by management to develop these estimates in
determining that they are reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear.
DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT
We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our
audit.
CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS
Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the
audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of
management. Where applicable, management has corrected all such misstatements. In addition, none of
the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management, when applicable,
were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit's financial statements taken as
a whole.
DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT
For purposes of this report, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial
accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be
significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such
disagreements arose during the course of our audit.
MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS
We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management
representation letter dated June 20, 2017.
MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting
matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves
application of an accounting principle to the City's financial statements or a determination of the type of
auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the
consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our
knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants.
-3-
OTHER AUDIT FINDINGS OR ISSUES
We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing
standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these
discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a
condition to our retention.
OTHER MATTERS
We applied certain limited procedures to the management's discussion and analysis, the budgetary
comparison schedules, and the pension and OPEB-related required supplementary information (RSI) that
supplements the basic financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management
regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with
management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we
obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We did not audit the RSI and do not express
an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI.
We were engaged to report on the combining and individual fund statements and schedules accompanying
the financial statements and the separately issued Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, which are
not RSI. With respect to this supplementary information, we made certain inquiries of management and
evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing the information to determine that the information
complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the method of
preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and complete in
relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled the supplementary
information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the
financial statements themselves.
We were not engaged to report on the introductory and statistical sections, which accompany the financial
statements, but are not RSI. Such information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in
the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any
assurance on it.
-4-
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's
governmental funds, which includes the General, special revenue, debt service, and capital project funds.
These funds are used to account for the basic services the City provides to all of its citizens, which are
financed primarily with property taxes. The governmental fund information in the City's financial
statements focuses on budgetary compliance and the sufficiency of each governmental fund's current
assets to finance its current liabilities.
PROPERTY TAXES
Minnesota cities rely heavily on local property tax levies to support their governmental fund activities.
For the 2015 fiscal year, local ad valorem property tax levies provided 39.8 percent of the total
governmental fund revenues for cities over 2,500 in population, and 35.6 percent for cities under 2,500 in
population. Property tax levies certified by Minnesota cities for 2016 increased about 4.8 percent over
2015, compared to an increase of 4.0 percent the prior year.
The total market value of property in Minnesota cities increased about 5.7 percent for the 2016 levy year.
While the percentage of market value growth was less than the 8.5 percent increase for levy year 2015, it
was considerably larger than the 1.1 percent growth experienced in levy year 2014. Market values
increased across all property categories for 2016, with gains in the market values of nonhomestead
residential properties (9.1 percent) and other properties (7.3 percent) outpacing the market value gain of
residential homestead properties (5.0 percent), commercial/industrial properties (4.9 percent), and farms
(0.1 percent). The market values used for levying property taxes are based on the previous fiscal year
(e.g., market values for taxes levied in 2016 were based on assessed values as of January 1, 2015), so the
trend of change in these market values lags somewhat behind the housing market and economy in general.
The City's taxable market value increased 26.0 percent for taxes payable in 2015 and 13.1 percent for
taxes payable in 2016. The following graph shows the City's changes in taxable market value over the
past 10 years:
$1,800,000,000
$1,600,000,000
$1,400,000,000
$1,200,000,000
$1,000,000,000
$800,000,000
$600,000,000
$400,000,000
$200,000,000
Taxable Market Value
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
-5-
Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state's
property classification system to each property's market value. Each property classification, such as
commercial or residential, has a different calculation and uses different rates. Consequently, a city's total
tax capacity will change at a different rate than its total market value, as tax capacity is affected by the
proportion of the City's tax base that is in each property classification from year-to-year, as well as
legislative changes to tax rates. The City's tax capacity for taxes payable in 2015 increased 29.6 percent
and 7.8 percent in 2016. The following graph shows the City's change in tax capacities over the past
10 years:
$27,500,000
$25,000,000
$22,500,000
$20,000,000
$17,500,000
$15,000,000
$12,500,000
$10,000,000
$7,500,000
$5,000,000
$2,500,000
Local Tax Capacity
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
The City's portion of the average state-wide tax rates for 2016 showed a small decrease from the prior
year, as levy increases were offset by improvements in property tax capacities. The following table
presents the average tax rates applied to city residents for each of the last two levy years, along with
comparative state-wide rates:
Rates expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity
All Cities
State -Wide City of Monticello
2015 2016 2015 2016
Average tax rate
City 46.9 46.5 35.7 34.5
County
44.7
44.1 40.6 40.0
School
27.1
27.5 22.9 20.9
Special taxing
6.9
6.9 — 1.1
Total
125.6
125.0 99.2 96.5
Average tax rates have been below state-wide averages for the last few years as a result of improved
market values and tax capacities. The increase in market values and local tax capacity in 2015 and 2016 is
related to significant increases to market values at the Xcel Power Plant.
10
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES
The following table presents the per capita revenue of the City's governmental funds for the past
three years, along with state-wide averages.
We have included the most recent comparative state-wide averages available from the Office of the State
Auditor to provide a benchmark for interpreting the City's data. The amounts received from the typical
major sources of governmental fund revenue will naturally vary between cities based on factors such as a
city's stage of development, location, size and density of its population, property values, services it
provides, and other attributes. It will also differ from year-to-year due to the effect of inflation and
changes in its operation. Also, certain data in these tables may be classified differently than how they
appear in the City's financial statements in order to be more comparable to the state-wide information,
particularly in separating capital expenditures from current expenditures.
We have designed this section of our management report using per capita data in order to better identify
unique or unusual trends and activities of the City. We intend for this type of comparative and trend
information to complement, rather than duplicate, information in the management's discussion and
analysis. An inherent difficulty in presenting per capita information is the accuracy of the population
count, which for most years is based on estimates.
Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita
With State -Wide Averages by Population Class
The City has generated more property tax revenue for its governmental funds revenue compared to the
average Minnesota city. The City continues to generate more tax increment revenue per capita than
average, as it has made use of this tool to finance commercial development. The City generates more
special assessment revenue (typically used for new development) as the City continues to be in a growth
phase.
The City's per capita governmental funds revenue for 2016 was $1,297, a decrease of about 4.5 percent,
from the prior year. Special assessments decreased $179 per capita, as the City received a large amount of
assessments from the I-94 Interchange Project in 2015. Property tax revenue increased $41 per capita
based on an increase in the tax levy. Intergovernmental revenue increased $37 per capita, due to the City
receiving increased federal, state, and county funding in 2016 for the Highway 25/75 Intersection Project.
Licenses and permits revenue increased $15 per capita, due to increased building permit sales related to
increased development projects in 2016. Charges for services and other revenues increased $10 and
$14 per capita, respectively, based on increased storm sewer trunk charges, higher investment earnings
from an increase in investments, and the sale of parcels of land held for resale.
EVA
State -Wide
City of Monticello
Year
December 31, 2015
2014
2015
2016
Population
2,500-10,000
10,000-20,000
20,000-100,000
12,993
13,125
13,299
Property taxes
$ 443
$ 414
$ 443
$ 647
$ 658
$ 699
Tax increments
26
33
37
64
55
50
Franchise fees and other taxes
33
42
39
28
25
31
Special assessments
59
52
59
147
253
74
Licenses and permits
31
31
43
29
35
50
Intergovernmental revenues
285
322
156
56
116
153
Charges for services
110
85
94
131
157
167
Other
69
62
58
91
59
73
Total revenue
$ 1,056
$ 1,041
$ 929
$ 1,193
$ 1,358
$ 1,297
The City has generated more property tax revenue for its governmental funds revenue compared to the
average Minnesota city. The City continues to generate more tax increment revenue per capita than
average, as it has made use of this tool to finance commercial development. The City generates more
special assessment revenue (typically used for new development) as the City continues to be in a growth
phase.
The City's per capita governmental funds revenue for 2016 was $1,297, a decrease of about 4.5 percent,
from the prior year. Special assessments decreased $179 per capita, as the City received a large amount of
assessments from the I-94 Interchange Project in 2015. Property tax revenue increased $41 per capita
based on an increase in the tax levy. Intergovernmental revenue increased $37 per capita, due to the City
receiving increased federal, state, and county funding in 2016 for the Highway 25/75 Intersection Project.
Licenses and permits revenue increased $15 per capita, due to increased building permit sales related to
increased development projects in 2016. Charges for services and other revenues increased $10 and
$14 per capita, respectively, based on increased storm sewer trunk charges, higher investment earnings
from an increase in investments, and the sale of parcels of land held for resale.
EVA
The expenditures of governmental funds will also vary from state-wide averages and from year-to-year,
based on the City's circumstances. Expenditures are classified into three types as follows:
• Current — These are typically the general operating type expenditures occurring on an annual
basis, and are primarily funded by general sources such as taxes and intergovernmental revenues.
• Capital Outlay and Construction — These expenditures do not occur on a consistent basis, more
typically fluctuating significantly from year-to-year. Many of these expenditures are
project -oriented, and are often funded by specific sources that have benefited from the
expenditure, such as special assessment improvement projects.
• Debt Service — Although the expenditures for debt service may be relatively consistent over the
term of the respective debt, the funding source is the important factor. Some debt may be repaid
through specific sources such as special assessments or redevelopment funding, while other debt
may be repaid with general property taxes.
The City's expenditures per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with
comparative state-wide averages, are presented in the following table:
Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita
With State -Wide Averages by Population Class
The City's governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state-wide averages for
cities in the same population class.
The City's per capita expenditures for capital outlay and construction increased significantly from the
prior year and will vary on a yearly basis depending on current, ongoing capital projects. Debt service
costs are significantly higher than other cities state-wide, due to the stage of development of the City.
State -Wide
City of Monticello
Year
December 31, 2015
2014
2015
2016
Population
2,500-10,000
10,000-20,000
20,000-100,000
12,993
13,125
13,299
Current
General government
$ 134
$ 109
$ 89
$ 112
$ 112
$ 112
Public safety
255
244
261
142
150
153
Street maintenance and
lighting
119
117
99
138
132
146
Recreation and culture
88
108
94
184
200
207
All other
64
70
89
124
140
88
660
648
632
700
734
706
Capital outlay
and construction
372
389
286
171
171
469
Debt service
Principal
181
178
117
416
383
427
Interest and fiscal charges
51
40
33
51
49
48
232
218
150
467
432
475
Total expenditures
$ 1,264
$ 1,255
$ 1,068
$ 1,338
$ 1,337
$ 1,650
The City's governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state-wide averages for
cities in the same population class.
The City's per capita expenditures for capital outlay and construction increased significantly from the
prior year and will vary on a yearly basis depending on current, ongoing capital projects. Debt service
costs are significantly higher than other cities state-wide, due to the stage of development of the City.
GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES
The following table summarizes the changes in the fund balances of the City's governmental funds during
the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, presented both by fund balance classification and by fund:
Governmental Fund Changes in Fund Balance
As reflected in the table above, total governmental fund balance increased by $1,298,752. The increase
was largely due to the increase in fund balance in the Capital Projects Fund from unspent bond proceeds
and positive results compared to budget in the General Fund. These were both offset by the decrease in
fund balance in the Debt Service Fund, mainly from the decrease in special assessments collected as well
as increased principal payments on outstanding debt.
In
Fund Balance
as of December 31,
Increase
2015
2016
(Decrease)
Fund balances of governmental funds
Total by classification
Nonspendable
$
4,373,045
$
3,824,575
$
(548,470)
Restricted
8,619,905
6,987,234
(1,632,671)
Assigned
11,109,806
13,320,718
2,210,912
Unassigned
4,873,494
6,142,475
1,268,981
Total governmental funds
$
28,976,250
$
30,275,002
$
1,298,752
Total by fund
Major funds
General
$
4,986,796
$
6,276,720
$
1,289,924
Community Center
629,442
761,829
132,387
Economic Development Authority
6,562,865
7,142,330
579,465
Debt Service
5,382,214
3,543,551
(1,838,663)
Capital Projects
5,392,213
6,884,229
1,492,016
Nonmajor funds
6,022,720
5,666,343
(356,377)
Total governmental funds
$
28,976,250
$
30,275,002
$
1,298,752
As reflected in the table above, total governmental fund balance increased by $1,298,752. The increase
was largely due to the increase in fund balance in the Capital Projects Fund from unspent bond proceeds
and positive results compared to budget in the General Fund. These were both offset by the decrease in
fund balance in the Debt Service Fund, mainly from the decrease in special assessments collected as well
as increased principal payments on outstanding debt.
In
GENERAL FUND
The City's General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the
community. The primary services included within this fund are the administration of the municipal
operations, police and fire protection, building inspection, streets and highway maintenance, and
recreation and culture.
The following graph displays the City's General Fund trends of financial position and changes in the
volume of financial activity. Fund balance and cash balance are typically used as indicators of financial
health or equity, while annual expenditures are often used to measure the size of the operation.
$8,500,000
$8,000,000
$7,500,000
$7,000,000
$6,500,000
$6,000,000
$5,500,000
$5,000,000
$4,500,000
$4,000,000
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
General Fund Financial Position
Year Ended December 31,
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
� Fund Balance D Cash Balance Expenditures
The City's General Fund cash and investments balance at December 31, 2016 was $7,091,381, which
increased $277,443 from 2015. Total fund balance at December 31, 2016 was $6,276,720, up $1,289,924.
This fund balance level represents approximately 89.8 percent of the City's annual General Fund
expenditures, based on 2016 expenditure levels. The City's adopted fund balance policy requires that the
City set aside fund balance to represent 45.0 percent of expenditures for working capital and
contingencies.
Having an appropriate fund balance is an important factor because a government, like any organization,
requires a certain amount of equity to operate. Generally, the amount of equity required typically
increases as the size of the operation increases. A healthy financial position also allows the City to avoid
volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the adequate and
consistent funding of services, repairs, and unexpected costs; and can be a factor in determining the City's
bond rating and resulting interest costs.
-10-
The following illustration provides you with the components of the City's General Fund revenue
compared to budget for 2016:
Property Taxes
Licenses and Permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for Services
Other
General Fund Revenue
Budget to Actual
p0� SOP �O) p0R�O� SOP p0� �O� �O� p0� zO� zO� p0�
Opp, P'�O�p, ���, ODP pp, �0zz, OP Opp, �h�P,
■ Budget ❑ Actual
Total General Fund revenues for 2016 were $8,271,556, which was $675,556 (8.9 percent) over the final
budget. As reflected in the table above, other revenues were over budget by $166,059, which was mainly
due to receiving dividends from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust that were not expected in
the budget. Licenses and permits revenue also exceeded budgeted amounts by $329,702, as a result of
increased development and new construction that was not budgeted for.
The following graph presents the City's General Fund revenue sources for the last five years:
$6,500,000
$6,000,000
$5,500,000
$5,000,000
$4,500,000
$4,000,000
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
General Fund Revenue by Source
Year Ended December 31,
Ta x es Intergovernmental Other
■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ❑ 2015 ■ 2016
The graph reflects the City's increasing reliance on taxes to finance its General Fund operations.
Overall, General Fund revenues increased $633,910 (8.3 percent) from the previous year. Property taxes
increased $298,174, due to an increase in the General Fund tax levy. Other revenues increased $301,410,
mainly due to an increase in the sales of buildings permits in 2016 related to new home construction and
other development projects.
-11-
The following graph illustrates the components of General Fund spending for 2016 compared to budget:
General Governmental
Public Safety
Public Works
Recreation and Culture
Other
General Fund Expenditures
Budget to Actual
6�1 OHO OQO OHO OQO OQO OQO
■ Budget ■ Actual
Total General Fund expenditures for 2016 were $6,992,812, which was $603,188 (7.9 percent) under
budget. The public works area was under budget by $443,118, mainly in street repairs and administration.
The general government area was under budget by $67,706, mainly within the finance department.
The following illustration provides you with the components of the City's General Fund spending by
function for the past five years:
$2,250,000
$2,000,000
$1,750,000
$1,500,000
$1,250,000
$1,000,000
$750,000
$500,000
$250,000
General Fund Expenditures by Function
Year Ended December 31,
General Public Safety Public Works Recreation and Other
Governmental Culture
■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ❑ 2015 ■ 2016
Overall, General Fund expenditures increased $277,443 (4.1 percent) from the prior year. All general
fund expenditure functions increased in 2016, with the largest change in public works ($93,821), mainly
due to increased equipment rentals. Public safety expenditures increased $63,791, mainly due to increased
building inspections.
-12-
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
The City maintains several enterprise funds to account for services the City provides that are financed
primarily through fees charged to those utilizing the service. This section of the report provides you with
an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's enterprise funds, which includes the Water
Utility, Sewage Utility, Liquor Operations, Fiber Optics, and Deputy Registrar Funds.
ENTERPRISE FUNDS FINANCIAL POSITION
The following table summarizes the changes in the financial position of the City's enterprise funds during
the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, presented both by classification and by fund:
Enterprise Funds Change in Financial Position
Net position of enterprise funds
Total by classification
Net investment in capital assets
Unrestricted
Total enterprise funds
Total by fund
Water
Sewage
Liquor
Fiber Optics
Deputy Registrar
Net Position
as of December 31, Increase
2015 2016 (Decrease)
$ 40,722,087
$ 41,014,122
$ 292,035
8,136,000
8,998,670
862,670
$ 48,858,087
$ 50,012,792
$ 1,154,705
$ 14,328,760
$ 14,390,486
$ 61,726
19,813,546
20,489,128
675,582
905,806
1,141,827
236,021
13,400,141
13,361,470
(38,671)
409,834
629,881
220,047
Total enterprise funds $ 48,858,087 $ 50,012,792 $ 1,154,705
-13-
WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
The following graph presents 10 years of comparative operating results for the City's Water Enterprise
Fund:
$1,400,000
$1,300,000
$1,200,000
$1,100,000
$1,000,000
$900,000
$800,000
$700,000
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
Water Enterprise Fund
Year Ended December 31,
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
D Operating Revenue
Operating Expense
Operating Income Before Depreciation
At December 31, 2016, the Water Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $4,035,865 and a net position of
$14,390,486. Net position consisted of $10,135,313 in net investment in capital assets and $4,255,173 in
unrestricted net position.
Operating revenue in the Water Enterprise Fund is $1,172,258, an increase of $45,540 from the prior
year, mostly due to an increase in rates while operating expenses for 2016 were $1,172,236, an increase
of $67,000, mainly in personal services.
It is important that this fund continue to have positive operating results so as not to place an additional
burden on other city funds. It is also important that the City continue to monitor water rates so that they
are designed to also provide for future repairs and replacement of the infrastructure assets.
-14-
SEWAGE ENTERPRISE FUND
The following graph presents 10 years of comparative operating results for the City's Sewage Enterprise
Fund:
$2,800,000
$2,600,000
$2,400,000
$2,200,000
$2,000,000
$1,800,000
$1,600,000
$1,400,000
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
Sewage Enterprise Fund
Year Ended December 31,
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
O Operating Revenue
Operating Expense
Operating Income (Loss) Before Depreciation
At December 31, 2016, the Sewage Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $2,596,530 and a net position
balance of $20,489,128. Net position consisted of $17,580,101 in net investment in capital assets and
$2,909,027 of unrestricted net position.
Sewage Enterprise Fund operating revenues for 2016 were $2,223,252, which is $140,130 more than the
previous year, due to increased rates and usage. Operating expenses for 2016 were $2,554,310, which
decreased $28,244 from 2015.
It is important that this fund have positive operating results so as not to place an additional burden on
other city funds. It is also important that the City continue to monitor sewage rates so they are designed to
also provide for future repairs and replacement of infrastructure assets.
-15-
LIQUOR ENTERPRISE FUND
The following graph presents 10 years of comparative operating results for the Liquor Enterprise Fund:
$5,600,000
$5,200,000
$4,800,000
$4,400,000
$4,000,000
$3,600,000
$3,200,000
$2,800,000
$2,400,000
$2,000,000
$1,600,000
$1,200,000
$800,000
$400,000
Liquor Enterprise Fund
Year Ended December 31,
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
D Sales
v Operating Expenses
� Cost of Sales
Operating Income (Loss)
The Liquor Enterprise Fund ended 2016 with a net position balance of $1,141,827, an increase of
$236,021 from the prior year. Of the net position balance, $177,354 represents the investment in liquor
capital assets, leaving $964,473 of unrestricted net position.
Liquor sales for 2016 were $5,448,584, a decrease of $40,846 from last year. The Liquor Enterprise Fund
generated a gross profit of $1,407,360 in 2016, or about 25.8 percent, of gross sales. The Liquor
Enterprise Fund's gross profit margin decreased to a more comparative percentage with 2014 and years
prior after experiencing an improved gross profit percentage in 2015. Operating expenses for 2016 were
$836,048, an increase of $34,503 from last year, due to increased personal services, and materials and
supplies to meet the demand of consumers.
-16-
FIBER OPTICS ENTERPRISE FUND
The following graph presents six years of comparative operating results for the Fiber Optics Enterprise
Fund:
$4,000,000
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$(500,000)
$(1,000,000)
$(1,500,000)
Fiber Optics Enterprise Fund
Year Ended December 31,
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Operating Revenue
Operating Expense
Operating Income (Loss) Before Depreciation
2016
At December 31, 2016, the Fiber Optics Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $303,008 and a net
position balance of $13,361,470. Net position consisted of $13,055,556 in net investment in capital assets
and $305,914 of unrestricted net position.
Operating revenue in this fund was $1,739,566, an increase of $97,163, or 5.9 percent, in 2016. Operating
expenses also increased $61,128 in fiscal 2016. This was mainly due to turning over the management of
the City's FiberNet Monticello to a third party management company, which caused an increase in other
service charges.
The operating loss before depreciation in this fund during this year was $331,799. This was an
improvement of $35,808 in the current year, mostly related to increased operating revenues as the
third party management company was better equipped to advertise the service and obtain more customers.
As a result of improved, but still poor operating results, we recommend the City continue to monitor the
financial results of this fund. The continued monitoring of this fund would include a discussion on how
the current financial results compare to the future strategic plan for this fund. Most importantly, the future
strategic plan should continue to include a discussion on the impact this fund is having on the overall
financial health of the City, including what impact the changes made to the plan are expected to have on
the City as a whole in the short-term, but also over the long-term.
-17-
DEPUTY REGISTRAR ENTERPRISE FUND
The following graph presents eight years of comparative operating results for the City's Deputy Registrar
Enterprise Fund:
$600,000
$550,000
$500,000
$450,000
$400,000
$350,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
Deputy Registrar Fund
Year Ended December 31,
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
D Operating Revenue
Operating Expense
Operating Income (Loss) before depreciation
At December 31, 2016, the Deputy Registrar Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $817,006 and a net
position balance of $629,881. Net position consisted of $65,798 in net investment in capital assets and
$564,083 of unrestricted net position.
Deputy Registrar Enterprise Fund operating revenues for 2016 were $562,891, which is $26,960 more
than the previous year, mostly due to an increase in charges for services. Operating expenses for 2016
were $352,117, which is $33,431 higher than 2015, due to increased personal services.
GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In addition to fund -based information, the current reporting model for governmental entities also requires
the inclusion of two government -wide financial statements designed to present a clear picture of the City
as a single, unified entity. These government -wide statements provide information on the total cost of
delivering services, including capital assets and long-term liabilities.
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
The Statement of Net Position essentially tells you what the City owns and owes at a given point in time,
the last day of the fiscal year. Theoretically, net position represents the resources the City has leftover to
use for providing services after its debts are settled. However, those resources are not always in spendable
form, or there may be restrictions on how some of those resources can be used. Therefore, net position is
divided into three components: net investment in capital assets, restricted, and unrestricted.
The following table presents the components of the City's net position as of December 31, 2016 and
2015, for governmental activities and business -type activities:
The City's total net position at December 31, 2016 was $4,774,784 higher than the prior year. Of the
increase, $3,594,141 came from governmental activities and $1,180,643 from business -type activities.
The increase in the net investment in capital assets balance was mostly due to capital outlay activity
during fiscal 2016.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to present positive balances in all three categories of
net position, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and
business -type activities. The same situation held true for the prior year.
-19-
December 31,
Increase
2015
2016
(Decrease)
Net position
Governmental activities
Net investment in capital assets
$ 38,099,568 $
41,077,683
$ 2,978,115
Restricted
12,633,770
10,569,693
(2,064,077)
Unrestricted
18,144,067
20,824,170
2,680,103
Total governmental activities
68,877,405
72,471,546
3,594,141
Business -type activities
Net investment in capital assets
40,722,087
41,014,122
292,035
Unrestricted
8,163,982
9,052,590
888,608
Total business -type activities
48,886,069
50,066,712
1,180,643
Total net position
$ 117,763,474 $
122,538,258
$ 4,774,784
The City's total net position at December 31, 2016 was $4,774,784 higher than the prior year. Of the
increase, $3,594,141 came from governmental activities and $1,180,643 from business -type activities.
The increase in the net investment in capital assets balance was mostly due to capital outlay activity
during fiscal 2016.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to present positive balances in all three categories of
net position, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and
business -type activities. The same situation held true for the prior year.
-19-
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
The Statement of Activities tracks the City's yearly revenues and expenses, as well as any other
transactions that increase or reduce total net positions. These amounts represent the full cost of providing
services. The Statement of Activities provides a more comprehensive measure than just the amount of
cash that changed hands, as reflected in the fund -based financial statements. This statement includes the
cost of supplies used, depreciation of long-lived capital assets, and other accrual -based expenses.
The following table presents the change in the net position of the City for the years ended December 31,
2015 and 2016:
General revenues
Property taxes 8,683,585 9,270,592
Tax increments 727,617 668,352
Franchise taxes 333,484 412,217
Investment earnings 386,656 503,694
Gain on sale of capital assets 118,630 16,398
Special item — transfer of operations — 356,900
Special item— contribution of land to Wright County (5,511,547) —
Total general revenues and special items 4,738,425 11,228,153
Change in net position (3,753,844) 4,774,784
Net position — beginning of year 121,517,318 117,763,474
Net position — end of year $ 117,763,474 $ 122,538,258
One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side-by-side comparison to illustrate the difference in the
way the City's governmental and business -type operations are financed. The table clearly illustrates the
dependence of the City's governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and
unrestricted grants. It also shows if the City's business -type activities are generating sufficient program
revenues (service charges and program -specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the
current downward pressures on the general revenue sources.
-20-
Net Change
2015
2016
Net (expense) revenue
Governmental activities
General government
$ (1,233,638) $
(1,419,802)
Public safety
(1,284,810)
(1,098,466)
Public works
(2,456,534)
(2,067,366)
Sanitation
(563,477)
(510,344)
Transit
(40,000)
(41,250)
Recreation and culture
(1,645,565)
(2,052,388)
Economic development
(1,533,222)
(455,388)
Interest on long-term debt
(688,855)
(468,271)
Business -type activities
Water
292,437
191,639
Sewer
607,783
1,416,967
Liquor
725,707
577,597
Fiber optic
(894,058)
(743,696)
Deputy registrar
221,963
217,399
Total net (expense) revenue
(8,492,269)
(6,453,369)
General revenues
Property taxes 8,683,585 9,270,592
Tax increments 727,617 668,352
Franchise taxes 333,484 412,217
Investment earnings 386,656 503,694
Gain on sale of capital assets 118,630 16,398
Special item — transfer of operations — 356,900
Special item— contribution of land to Wright County (5,511,547) —
Total general revenues and special items 4,738,425 11,228,153
Change in net position (3,753,844) 4,774,784
Net position — beginning of year 121,517,318 117,763,474
Net position — end of year $ 117,763,474 $ 122,538,258
One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side-by-side comparison to illustrate the difference in the
way the City's governmental and business -type operations are financed. The table clearly illustrates the
dependence of the City's governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and
unrestricted grants. It also shows if the City's business -type activities are generating sufficient program
revenues (service charges and program -specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the
current downward pressures on the general revenue sources.
-20-
LEGISLATIVE UPDATES
The 2016 legislative session, falling in the second half of the state's fiscal biennium, was scheduled to be
a short session lasting only 11 weeks. Since biennial budgets are adopted in odd -year legislative sessions,
less time is usually needed for the even -year sessions. However, because the 2015 Legislature adjourned
without passing funding bills in several significant areas, it was anticipated that the 2016 legislative
session would be considerably more active than the typical short session. In spite of this, only a few
funding bills were brought forth to the Governor by the end of the 2016 regular legislative session,
including a supplemental budget bill and an omnibus tax bill. The Governor chose not to sign the tax bill
due to a drafting error that would have resulted in an unintended reduction of state revenues. When the
framework for a special session could not be agreed upon, the fiscal year ended without the adoption of a
new tax bill, capital bonding bill, or transportation funding package.
The following is a summary of recent legislation affecting Minnesota cities:
Border -to -Border Broadband Grants — The 2016 supplemental budget act appropriated
$35 million in fiscal 2017 for a Border -to -Border Broadband Grant Program. The grants, available
through the Office of Broadband Development in the Department of Employment and Economic
Development (DEED), provide funding to help communities meet state goals for the development of
state-wide high-speed broadband access, focusing on areas currently considered to be underserved or
with a high concentration of low-income households.
Equity -Related Programs and Grants — The 2016 supplemental budget act also appropriated
$35 million in fiscal 2017 for the financing of equity -related programs through DEED, the majority of
which was allocated for programs and grants for communities of color, people with disabilities,
seniors, and youth.
Sales Tax Exemption — Effective January 1, 2017, the sales tax exemption on the purchase of goods
or services enacted for cities in 2014 is expanded to include all special districts; city, county, or
township instrumentalities; economic development authorities; housing and redevelopment
authorities; and all joint power boards or organizations.
Taxes Covered Under Debt Management Services — Amendments were made to the statutes
governing debt management and debt settlement services to clarify the status of delinquent taxes
owed to Minnesota local governments and political subdivisions as debt with regard to those services,
and include those entities as creditors for the purpose of debt management services.
Elections — An omnibus elections law was passed making several changes to elections administration
requirements. In addition to establishing a presidential primary to take the place of the current caucus
system beginning in 2020, the law modified election procedures in a number of areas, including:
absentee balloting, voting station dimensions, election canvassing, candidate filing, the extension of
polling hours to accommodate voters in line at closing, and emergency election plans.
Police -Worn Body Cameras — A number of new laws were enacted related to portable recording
systems (police -worn body cameras) and the data derived from their use, addressing: data retention
and destruction, permitted uses of the systems, audits of the data, and vendor practices. Among the
changes are a requirement for gathering public input before purchasing or implementing the use of
portable recording systems, and requirements for the adoption and dissemination of written policies
over the use of portable recording systems.
Veteran Preference Act — New language was added to state statutes clarifying that Minnesota cities
and towns may require a veteran to complete an initial probationary period when hired.
-21-
Charitable Gambling — Cities that require charitable gambling organizations to contribute
10 percent of their net profits to the city for charitable purposes are now required to acknowledge the
source of the funds, either in communications about the receipt or distribution of the funds.
Donation of Surplus Equipment — Local governments are now permitted to donate surplus public
works equipment, cell phones, or emergency medical and firefighting equipment to nonprofit
organizations. The donation of surplus equipment was added to the list of exceptions to municipal tort
liability. Prior to making any such donations, a city must adopt a policy on how it will determine what
equipment is considered surplus and eligible for donation and how it will determine which nonprofit
organizations will receive such donations. The policy must address the city's obligation to disclose
that the donated equipment may be defective and cannot be relied upon for safety.
Temporary Family Health Care Housing Permits — A new special land use permit system was
established for a specific type of mobile health care -related mobile housing, intended to provide
transitional housing for seniors. Cities will be required to implement the new permit system unless
they officially act to opt out of the program. The program sets forth requirements for structure and
placement, the permit process and duration, applicants, inspections, and the process for opting out.
Partition Fence Viewing Exemption — Cities now have the authority to pass a resolution to exempt
adjoining owners or occupants from the partition fence law when their land is considered to be less
than 20 acres combined, thereby relieving the city of the responsibility of participating in a potentially
costly "fence -viewing" process to mediate disputes between adjoining landowners required to share
the costs of constructing fences.
-22-
ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING UPDATES
GASB STATEMENT NO. 73, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS AND RELATED
ASSETS THAT ARE NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF GASB STATEMENT 68, AND AMENDMENTS TO
CER TAINPROVISIONS OF GASB STATEMENTS 67 AND 68
This statement extends the approach to accounting and financial reporting established in GASB Statement
No. 68 to all pensions, including those not administered through a trust. Governmental employers
participating in such plans will be required to report the total of any unfunded pension liability related to
the plan in their accrual basis financial statements, rather than the net pension liability. The requirements
of this statement that address accounting and financial reporting by employers and governmental
nonemployer contributing entities for pensions not within the scope of GASB Statement No. 68, are
effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016.
This statement also clarified the application of certain provisions of GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68
regarding 10 -year schedules of required supplementary information (RSI) and other recognition issues
pertaining to employers and nonemployer contributing entities effective for financial statements for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2015.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 74, FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEHPLOYHENT BENEFIT PLANS OTHER
THAN PENSION PLANS
This statement establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for other
post -employment benefits (OPEB) plans, replacing GASB Statement Nos. 43 and 57. It also includes
requirements for defined contribution OPEB plans that replace the requirements for those OPEB plans in
GASB Statement Nos. 25, 43, and 50.
This statement will improve financial reporting primarily through enhanced note disclosures and
schedules of RSI that will be presented by OPEB plans administered through trusts meeting the specified
criteria. The new information will enhance the decision -usefulness of the financial reports of those OPEB
plans, their value for assessing accountability, and their transparency by providing information about
measures of net OPEB liabilities and explanations of how and why those liabilities changed from
year-to-year. The net OPEB liability information, including ratios, will offer an up-to-date indication of
the extent to which the total OPEB liability is covered by the fiduciary net position of the OPEB plan.
The comparability of the reported information for similar types of OPEB plans will be improved by the
changes related to the attribution method used to determine the total OPEB liability. The contribution
schedule will provide measures to evaluate decisions related to the assessment of contribution rates in
comparison with actuarially determined rates, if such rates are determined. In addition, new information
about rates of return on OPEB plan investments will inform financial report users about the effects of
market conditions on the OPEB plan's assets over time and provide information for users to assess the
relative success of the OPEB plan's investment strategy and the relative contribution that investment
earnings provide to the OPEB plan's ability to pay benefits to plan members when they come due.
This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016. Earlier
application is encouraged.
-23-
GASB STATEMENT No. 75, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS OTHER THANPENSIONS
GASB Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than
Pensions, establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for governments whose
employees are provided with OPEB, as well as for certain nonemployer governments that have a legal
obligation to provide financial support for OPEB provided to the employees of other entities. This
statement replaces the requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 45 and 57.
This statement establishes standards for recognizing and measuring liabilities, deferred outflows of
resources, deferred inflows of resources, and expense/expenditures. Similar to changes implemented for
pensions, this statement requires the liability of employers and nonemployer contributing entities to
employees for defined benefit OPEB (net OPEB liability) to be measured as the portion of the present
value of projected benefit payments to be provided to current active and inactive employees that is
attributed to those employees' past periods of service (total OPEB liability), less the amount of the OPEB
plan's fiduciary net position. Note disclosure and RSI requirements about defined benefit OPEB also are
addressed.
This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2017. Earlier application is
encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT No. 80, BLENDING REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN COMPONENT UNITS AN
AMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENT NO. 14
The objective of this statement is to clarify the financial statement presentation requirements for certain
component units. This statement amends the blending requirements for the financial statement
presentation of component units of all state and local governments. The additional criterion requires
blending of a component unit incorporated as a not-for-profit corporation in which the primary
government is the sole corporate member. The additional criterion does not apply to component units
included in the financial reporting entity pursuant to the provisions of GASB Statement No. 39,
Determining Whether Certain Organizations Are Component Units—an amendment of GASB Statement
No. 14.
The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016.
Earlier application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT No. 81, IRREVOCABLE SPLIT -INTEREST AGREEMENTS
This statement provides recognition and measurement guidance for the accounting and financial reporting
of irrevocable split -interest agreements by governments that are the beneficiary of such an agreement.
Split -interest agreements are a type of giving agreement used by donors to provide resources to two or
more beneficiaries, including governments.
This statement requires that a government that receives resources pursuant to an irrevocable split -interest
agreement (1) recognize assets, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources at the inception of the
agreement, (2) recognize assets representing its beneficial interests in irrevocable split -interest agreements
that are administered by a third parry if the government controls the present service capacity of the
beneficial interests, and (3) recognize revenue when the resources become applicable to the reporting
period.
The requirements of this statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after
December 15, 2016, and should be applied retroactively. Earlier application is encouraged.
-24-
GASB STATEMENT NO. 82, PENSIONISSUES ANAMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENTS NO. 67,
NO. 68, AND NO. 73
The intent of this statement is to address certain issues raised with respect to GASB Statement Nos. 67,
68, and 73.
This statement amends GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68, changing the definition of "covered payroll"
utilized in schedules of RSI from the payroll of employees that are provided with pensions through the
pension plan, to the payroll on which contributions to a pension plan are based. It clarifies that a
deviation, as the term is used in Actuarial Standards of Practice, is not considered to be in conformity
with the requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 67, 68, or 73 for the selection of assumptions used in
determining the total pension liability and related measures. It also clarifies that payments made by an
employer to satisfy contribution requirements that are identified by the pension plan terms as plan
member contribution requirements should be classified as plan member contributions for purposes of
Statement No. 67 and as employee contributions for purposes of Statement No. 68, and requires that an
employer's expense and expenditures for those amounts be recognized in the period for which the
contribution is assessed and classified in the same manner as the employer classifies similar compensation
other than pensions.
The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016,
except for the requirements of this statement for the selection of assumptions in a circumstance in which
an employer's pension liability is measured as of a date other than the employer's most recent fiscal
year-end. In that circumstance, the requirements for the selection of assumptions are effective for that
employer in the first reporting period in which the measurement date of the pension liability is on or after
June 15, 2017. Earlier application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 83, CERTAINASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
This statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for certain asset retirement obligations
(ARO), which are legally enforceable liabilities associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset.
This statement establishes criteria for determining the timing and pattern of recognition of a liability and a
corresponding deferred outflow of resources for ARO. A government that has legal obligations to perform
future asset retirement activities related to its tangible capital assets should recognize a liability when it is
both incurred and reasonably estimable. The measurement of an ARO is required to be based on the best
estimate of the current value of outlays expected to be incurred, and a deferred outflow of resources
associated with an ARO is required to be measured at the amount of the corresponding liability upon
initial measurement.
This statement requires the current value of a government's AROs to be adjusted for the effects of general
inflation or deflation at least annually, and a government to evaluate all relevant factors at least annually
to determine whether the effects of one or more of the factors are expected to significantly change the
estimated asset retirement outlays. A government should remeasure an ARO only when the result of the
evaluation indicates there is a significant change in the estimated outlays. Deferred outflows of resources
should be reduced and recognized as outflows of resources in a systematic and rational manner over the
estimated useful life of the tangible capital asset.
If a government owns a minority interest in a jointly owned tangible asset where a nongovernmental
entity is the majority owner or has operational responsibility for the jointly owned asset, the government's
minority share of an ARO should be reported using the measurement produced by the nongovernmental
majority owner or the nongovernmental minority owner that has operational responsibility, without
adjustment to conform to the liability measurement and recognition requirements of this statement.
-25-
The statement also requires disclosures of any funding or financial assurance requirements a government
has related to the performance of asset retirement activities, along with any assets restricted for the
payment of the government's AROs. This statement also requires disclosure of information about the
nature of a government's AROs, the methods and assumptions used for the estimates of the liabilities, and
the estimated remaining useful life of the associated tangible capital assets. If an ARO (or portions
thereof) has been incurred by a government but is not yet recognized because it is not reasonably
estimable, the government is required to disclose that fact and the reasons therefor. This statement
requires similar disclosures for a government's minority shares of AROs.
The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2018.
Earlier application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT No. 84, FIDUCIARYACTIVITIES
This statement establishes criteria for identifying fiduciary activities of all state and local governments.
The focus of the criteria generally is on (1) whether a government is controlling the assets of the fiduciary
activity and (2) the beneficiaries with whom a fiduciary relationship exists. Separate criteria are included
to identify fiduciary component units and postemployment benefit arrangements that are fiduciary
activities.
An activity meeting the criteria should be reported in a fiduciary fund in the basic financial statements,
which should present a statement of fiduciary net position and a statement of changes in fiduciary net
position. This statement describes four fiduciary funds that should be reported, if applicable: (1) pension
(and other employee benefit) trust funds, (2) investment trust funds, (3) private -purpose trust funds, and
(4) custodial funds. Custodial funds generally should report fiduciary activities that are not held in a trust
or equivalent arrangement that meets specific criteria.
A fiduciary component unit, when reported in the fiduciary fund financial statements of a primary
government, should combine its information with its component units that are fiduciary component units
and aggregate that combined information with the primary government's fiduciary funds.
This statement also provides for recognition of a liability to the beneficiaries in a fiduciary fund when an
event has occurred that compels the government to disburse fiduciary resources, defined as when a
demand for the resources has been made or when no further action, approval, or condition is required to
be taken or met by the beneficiary to release the assets.
The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018.
Earlier application is encouraged.
-26-
City Council Agenda — 6/26/17
4B. Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment reguiding
Outlots C & D. Otter Creek Crossing from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work'
and a request for Rezoning the subiect parcels from a B-4 (Regional Business)
District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers and John
Chadwick (NAC)
Property: Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing
155-171-000030 & 155-171-000040
Lengthy Legals for Parcels
Planning Case Number: 2017-013
A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND
The applicant has requested that the Citv Council table action on this item until
July.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Motion to table action on the request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment
reguiding Outlots C & D, Otter Creek Crossing from `Places to Shop' to
`Places to Work' and a request for Rezoning the subject parcels from a B-4
(Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District to the July 10th,
2017 meeting of the City Council.
2. Motion of other.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff defers to Council on the request to table.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
A. Applicant Request to Table
B. Staff Report, 6/12/17, including:
a. Resolution 2017-
b. Ordinance No. 6XX
c. Resolution PC -2017-008
d. Planning Commission Minutes, May 2nd, 2017
e. Aerial Site Image
f. Applicant Narrative
g. Excerpt, Monticello Comprehensive Plan:
i. Land Use Map
ii. Economic Development
h. Commercial Land Inventory Map
i. Industrial Land Inventory Map
City Council Agenda — 6/26/17
j. Excerpt, Monticello Zoning Ordinance
i. IBC (Industrial Business Campus)
ii. I-1 (Light Industrial)
iii. Use Table
k. Excerpt, Monticello Interchange Study
i. Concept Maps
1. Monticello Zoning Map
2
June; 21, 2017
Ms. Angela Schumann, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Monticello
505 Walnut St., Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
RE: Extension of Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning for Outlot C, Otter Creek
Crossing, PID #155-171-000030.
Dear Angela;
I would like to table the application for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning, for
the above referenced property, until one of the July City Council meetings.
This letter is stating that the delay is at the request of the applicant, and the city has complied
with Minnesota Statute 15.99 as to the required response period.
Thank You for your assistance.
JX ]Bowers, LLC.
Jim owers
John Chadwick Farms, LLC
June 21, 2017
Ms. Angela Schumann, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Monticello
505 Walnut St., Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
RE: Extension of Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning for Oudot D, Otter
Creek Crossing, PID #155-171-000040.
Dear Angela;
I would like to table the application for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning,
for the above referenced property, until one of the July City Council meetings.
This letter is stating that the delay is at the request of the applicant, and the city has complied
with Minnesota Statute 15.99 as to the required response period.
Thank You for your assistance.
Sincerel , 469e
J E. Chadwick
Vef Manager
John Chadwick Farms
4477 Manitou Road
Excelsior MN 55331
John Chadwick 952-853-247
johnchadwick@chadwickland.com
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2017 -XX
APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REDESIGNATING FROM
"PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO WORK" FOR
OUTLOTS C & D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to reguide the subject property,
identified as Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing and legally described in the attached "Exhibit
A", resulting in a change from business-related land uses to industrial -related land uses; and
WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to market the property for industrial
users; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent with the long-term use and
development of the property suggested by the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City has experienced a need for additional industrial land through
development inquiries; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 2, 2017 on the
application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present
information to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning
Commission, all of the comments of the hearing, and the staff report, which are incorporated by
reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of
Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval:
1. The land use plan amendment is an appropriate means of furthering the intent of
the Comprehensive Plan for the site.
2. The use of the site for industrial development is consistent with the City's
economic development objectives.
3. The amendment results in a land use designation that more closely achieves the
goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the current
regulations.
4. The amendment results in the potential for development that would be compatible
and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area.
6. The resulting land uses will have impacts on public services, including sewer,
water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the
property for the subject property as proposed.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: The Monticello City Council approves the Amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan redesignating the subject property as legally described in "Exhibit A" from
"Places to Shop" to "Places to Work".
ADOPTED BY the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota this 12th day of June, 2017.
ATTEST:
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PARCELS
PARCEL 1:
That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright
County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of,
as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D.
PARCEL 2:
Outlot C, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County,
Minnesota.
:►m
That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright
County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of,
as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D.
ORDINANCE NO. 669
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE,
KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY FROM B-4, GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO
IBC, INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS DISTRICT:
OUTLOTS C AND D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS:
Section 1. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the
following described parcels from B-4, Regional Business to IBC, Industrial
Business Campus District:
PID NUMBERS: 155-171-000030 & 155-171-000040
(See attached Legal Description)
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this
ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time.
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance
as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to
renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended
effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary
corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process,
provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance
as has been adopted.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage
and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the
City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are
available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request.
ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2017.
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 669
ATTEST:
Jeff O'Neill, Administrator
AYES:
NAYS:
ORDINANCE NO. 669
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PARCELS
PARCEL 1:
That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Wright County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet
northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D.
PARCEL 2:
Outlot C, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County,
Minnesota.
AND
That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Wright County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet
northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-008
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
REDESIGNATING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO
"PLACES TO WORK", AND REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM
"B-4", REGIONAL BUSINESS TO "IBC", INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS"
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to reguide and rezone subject
property, identified as Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing, resulting in a change from
business-related land uses to industrial -related land uses; and
WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to market the property for industrial
users; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are consistent with the long-term use and
development of the property suggested by the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City has experienced a need for additional industrial land through
development inquiries; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 2, 2017 on the
application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to
present information to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the
staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following
Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval:
1. The land use plan amendment and rezoning are an appropriate means of
furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site.
2. The use of the site for industrial development is consistent with the City's
economic development objectives.
3. The amendments result in a land use designation that more closely achieves
the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the current
regulations.
4. The amendments result in the potential for development that would be
compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area.
6. The resulting land uses will have impacts on public services, including sewer,
water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the
property for the subject property as proposed.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-008
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
Monticello City Council approves the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, redesignating
the subject property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work", and adopts Ordinance No.
rezoning the subject property from B-4, Regional Business to IBC, Industrial Business
Campus.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of May, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
L'In
ATTEST:
Brad Fyle, Chair
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
2
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, May 2°d, 2017 - 6:00 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Special Joint Meeting
Mississippi Room - 5:00 PM
Concept Stage Planned Unit Development for Detached
Townhome Lots
Applicant: Carlisle Village, LLC
Present: John Alstad, Brad Fyle, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, Lucas Wynne
Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler
Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), John Rued
1. General Business
A. Call to Order
Chairman Brad Fyle called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
B. Consideration of aoDrovine minutes
a. Special Meeting Minutes — April 01, 2017
MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL
MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 4TH, 2017. MOTION
SECONDED BY SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED, 5-0.
b. Regular Meeting Minutes — April 411, 2017
MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR
MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 4TH, 2017. MOTION
SECONDED BY SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED, 5-0.
C. Citizen Comments
None.
D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
Marc Simpson asked to add an item at the end of agenda.
2. Public Hearings
A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a reauest for Rezoning to Planned Unit
Development, a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development
for Vehicle Sales and Rental, Auto Repair — Minor, and Accessory Office and
Retail Uses in a B-3 (Hiehwav Business) District
Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC
Brad Fyle announced that the applicant requested tabling action.
Brad Fyle opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments, the public hearing
was closed.
SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO TABLE ACTION TO THE JUNE 6TH, 2017
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0.
B. Public Hearing — Consideration of a reauest for Comprehensive Plan
Amendment for `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a reauest for
Rezoning from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industriall)
District
Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick
Steve Grittman stated two parcels were included in the land use application
request. The properties are referred to as the Bowers/Chadwick parcels and lie
between I-94 and Chelsea Road. It is west of Moon Motorsports and adjacent to
the City's industrial development park. Grittman noted that the area was
previously rezoned from industrial to commercial due to the economy at the time.
Since commercial development has not occurred, the applicants sought to re -
guide the property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work" and rezone from B-
4 (Regional Business) District to I-1 (Light Industrial).
Grittman explained that requests for re -guiding and rezoning, the City examines a
number of factors that support the change. Surrounding land use patterns,
adequate utilities and roadways, and City policies for Economic Development
were all mentioned. The City notes that there is becoming a tighter demand for
industrial land and they have been receiving inquiries routinely.
Grittman noted that the request would be consistent with the industrial land
designations located to the south and west of the parcels. Chelsea Road is a major
collector road and is able to accommodate large amounts of traffic. At the current
time the land use is compatible with the area, but the City is also working on an
interchange land study. Grittman explained that the plan is looking at the
intersection of County Road 39 and I-94, which could have implications for
development of the Bowers/Chadwick's parcels. Staff believes that the industrial
designation would be compatible, but a possible interchange at County Road 39
and I-94 could cause commercial development pressure directly at the interchange
location.
Staff noted concerns with outdoor storage that would be visible from the freeway
that would be allowed under the I-1 District zoning request. Staff therefore
recommended rezoning the parcels to IBC (Industrial and Business Campus)
District. Grittman noted that the setbacks and uses were similar with the two
industrial districts, but outdoor storage would be restricted and site and building
design requirements also vary between the two. City staff felt that a visual
transition from the freeway to the west and south industrial would be
complimentary by having the parcels rezoned to IBC, as the City's industrial park
has in place covenants which restrict outdoor storage and require a higher design
2
standard. Staff recommended re -guiding the parcels from "Places to Shop" to
"Places to Work" and rezoning to IBC.
Brad Fyle asked if the property abuts the freeway right-of-way line. Grittman
confirmed and stated there was not a designated easement along the freeway other
than the standard drainage and utility easement.
Charlotte Gabler commented that she believed either industrial zoning designation
would match the area.
Marc Simpson asked if the main difference between the IBC and the I-1 District
was outdoor storage. Grittman confirmed, stating additional requirements would
also apply for building materials and site plan. He also mentioned that the IBC
allows a few business related uses such as office and hospitality uses.
Sam Murdoff asked if there was an idea of when a possible interchange would be
constructed. Grittman stated that until work has been completed on Highway 25
planning, the work on west interchange planning has been put on hold.
Marc Simpson asked what the red dotted line around the parcels meant. Grittman
stated that the parcels were located in the Special Use Overlay District.
Fyle opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to speak first. Wayne
Elam, Commercial Realty Solutions, explained that each parcel is 19 acres. He
provided history of the reason for the request and stated that he sat in on an EDA
Meeting, where Jim Thares noted the City was running short on industrial land.
There were requests out there from industrial developers looking for 5 to 20 acres
of land and with current industrial needs could not be met with Otter Creek.
Following the meeting, Elam met with John Chadwick and Jim Bowers to discuss
the City's need for more industrial land. Elam recommended that they request
rezoning from business to industrial.
Elam echoed concerns industrial developers have with the shape of the lots in
Otter Creek Industrial Park and said that rectangle shaped lots were most cost
effective for industrial development.
Elam stated the City has 317 acres of commercially zoned land with 80 acres of
commercial land on the interstate. He expected the commercial development to
occur mostly south of Highway 25 or near Mills Fleet Farm.
Elam also indicated that they are requesting I-1 and noted some of the differences
with the I-1 and IBC Districts. He stated that he didn't feel this location would be
good for a hotel. He expressed concerns with precluding outdoor storage. He
reiterated the importance of the I-1 designation and offered a better screening
requirement as a tradeoff.
John Chadwick, 4477 Manitou Lane, Excelsior, explained the history of the
parcels. Chadwick mentioned the benefits of the rezoning that would occur with
industrial development especially because of the location of the lift -station.
Chadwick expressed that the IBC was not consistent in the area, and that I-1 is
located adjacent to the property.
Gabler stated the City and IEDC are working on increasing the size of the
industrial park or land availability.
Wayne Elam stated there is currently IBC land located in the City, with 13 vacant,
acres east of the Monticello Workforce Center and 7.5 acres in between Mills
Fleet Farm and UMC. He noted that there has not been any development on IBC
land.
Angela Schumann responded that when the City recodified the Zoning Ordinance,
the previously distinguished I -A District was removed, while the IBC was added.
Land that was designated I -A was either zoned to IBC or I-1. Schumann
confirmed that there has been no construction on the IBC districts.
Brad Fyle commented that he didn't want to recommend approval of a rezoning if
the owner didn't want it rezoned.
Elam stated that he was speaking on behalf of the owners and that they wanted to
rezone away from commercial to industrial, either IBC or I-1. Elam reiterated the
importance of rezoning to I-1.
Gabler asked if a future applicant could apply for a PUD for the parcels and
request outdoor storage. Schumann confirmed and added that under the I-1,
outdoor storage could be as large as the principal building. She noted that staff are
currently working on a revised set of standards for screening and outdoor storage
that would come forward at a future meeting. Schumann stated that staff
recommend staying with the IBC District because of the restrictions on outdoor
storage due to the visbilityof the double fronting lots.
Fyle expressed he was leaning towards rezoning to IBC because of visibility.
Elam added that with the changes that were soon to be proposed for outdoor
storage and screening, he suggested increasing the height of screening.
Murdoff asked for examples of outdoor storage that could be seen in this area.
Grittinan responded that it depended on the development.
Lucas Wynne stated that the decision is based on the desire for how Monticello
wants to present itself in the future. Wynne expressed desire for a stricter set of
zoning standards due to visibility, but also had concerns with restricting the type
of industrial development.
Elam noted that if the City rezoned the area to IBC that they also needed to look
where they would put additional I-1.
11
Murdoff agreed that there was a need for I-1 with outdoor storage, but wasn't sure
if those parcels were the right area. He expressed that a rezoning could possibly
be a disservice as there currently is no development plans for the area.
Schumann noted that the City is very aware of the need for industrial land. She
expressed that the City has a Comprehensive Plan which guides areas for places
to work. Schumann than talked about outdoor storage, stating that it didn't have to
do strictly with the site appearance, but rather the amount of jobs, wages, and tax
base. She noted the importance of balancing outdoor storage with increasing jobs
and tax base.
MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION PC -2017 - 008
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT TO "PLACES TO WORK", AND ORDINANCE NO. 6XX FOR
REZONING FROM B-4 (REGIONAL BUSINESS) DISTRICT TO IBC
(INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS) DISTRICT AS PROPOSED BY CITY
STAFF. BRAD FYLE SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0.
Schumann stated that the recommendation would be subject to a super -majority
vote by the City Council on May 22nd.
3. Regular Agenda
A. Consideration of the Communitv Develonnlent Directors Report
Angela Schumann thanked Council Member Gabler for being on top of things at
the legislature. Schumann noted the League of MN Cities resource information on
legislature items such as interim ordinances was provided in the packet.
Schumann also noted that on Thursday, May 4th the Small Area Study Steering
Committee would be meeting. She expected that a plan would come before the
commission in a June or July meeting. There would be a public open house at
West Bridge Park.
Information about educational sessions was also provided.
4. Added Items
Marc Simpson asked Schumann if the Planning Commission could move to electronic
agendas. Schumann responded saying that the City Council was trying them out first. She
believed that the City Clerk stated within the next few years that the EDA and Planning
Commission would also transfer over.
5. Adjournment
MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:07 P.M. SAM
MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0.
Recorder: Jacob Thunander T7
Approved: May 2, 2017
5
Attest:
Angela Scl�
Development Director
Bowers, Jim/Chadwick, John - Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning
Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing 1155-171-000030& 155-171-000040 1 Lengthy Legals
Created by: City of Monticello
Ahl
AO►
COMMERCIAL REALTY SOLUTIONS
ww:.,.commrealiysolutions.com
April 3, 2017
1 �CIEUVE
D
AP j 1017
RE: Zoning Change Application and Comprehensive Plan Amendment from B-4 to I-1.
Properties:
John Chadwick Farms, LLC
XXXX Chelsea Road West, Monticello
Otter Creek Crossing, 19.08 acres, Outlot D
PID: 155-171-000040
JX Bowers, LLC
XXXX Chelsea Road West, Monticello
Otter Creek Crossing, 19.09 acres, Outlot C
PID #155-171-000030
This is a joint application.
Reason for Request: This property is between the City owned Otter Creek Industrial Park and I-94.
There is a need for large acreage industrial parcels. This property is a logical solution for adding
additional industrial land without incurring large infrastructure development costs.
There is in excess of 300 acres of available property within the City of Monticello that is zoned
Commercial, of which approximately 80 acres of that land is located on the interstate.
It is a better use of the property for both the City and the Owners to rezone it to I-1 Industrial.
2
�' � f..� � :a�F� - ,�. �.•�t�, '�_"8t . _ � .. � ;I,(�,• •;fit .i.
�"" . f. � _ ar: ,�+La„ .ta {..'' t - � " *.Y •i���;. � � fir{ - 1
�w'4+„ � A?��' }II�"a# V'�--ter .,. f , �,4' �; ,�' 7{ L JM.�- �' '` 'T�`M _.. "3•#ct��, � It I .' -. ".�
� f � +� d ;�. �3•'�1,� �_ .� � ��4tVNES.:,�,�A.S 4„ +�• r�i�.�s� -- j �j
LY
Ln
r 4 S
fv.
•,/��/• �w�y,� �f• •% rY ��•f } •..�A''
�� �•� � .rain ! .�� ( Y♦ I J_ _- •��r�
ILwAY• •n
NO�, �' 1G' � 1 ! �. �1.. ��� `j'. f _ • ►• �'}' � r . rL�fl {r 4� ��f(q,- '•"4
LO
Ck
EST
� I
• p `��p- '� : �a�c ,� �-,�'�e�a.,,`�`�rr` �" �• �� r..�r, l "�•1 � s � �``�'����•-,df � �,,+� ia+..rr ,ut�, �.�� y ��� 'r �, '�',
� • I .ter-..' �•i/ ♦ i {j4`r'�f'i F A -C'
Ln
- - ts,. _ • . ,JJ f ��•^- z ; -'- / �► 1,� � .rte,.... `� • �`'' ``
�� �• �. ": 'I {Y�,J Y moi. p�wt �•. -�� j'5����/ I .• w
� y.. 3 _In. F T' � � ,yam ,� • � j 0
V,
1A p
.i 1 p t
LL
13
I
• .. Via. -�._. � _� "'
� •r �!W_C�F1.Y-�N�1R� Y.s:.l �_ '` \�:;t �+��'�� YR I1 V'JL'� Y �! Q
� ( V
FA
ILA
Birch
Lake °
a North 106
e E' Lake
0
Cc
0 0.25 0.5 1
s Miles ► °
a
Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright
County, and WSB & Associates. June 9, 2014
Amended by City Council Resolution 2014-062, June 9, 2014
Legend
Places to Live
Lake Qr) + Places to Shop
i Places to Work
Places to Recreate
-
L
'p + Places for Community
?r Lake�) + Downtown
Mixed Use
o
Interchange Planning Area
a
Urban Reserve
Infrastructure
0 0�
^- Rivers and Streams
iPublic Waters Inventory
Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories)
D root Potential Greenway
Q J
Potential Interchange
° Future Bridge
*%a* Existing Arterial or Collector Road
1
'j*,* Proposed Arterial or Collector Road
^�� Powerline
Monticello City Boundary
Orderly Annexation Area
c "' I I
NE �
1�, o
Land Use Plan
Facilitating Redevelopment
The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create a place where
land use plans, policies, and controls work together
with private investment to properly maintain all
properties in Monticello. It is recognized that this
approach may not succeed in all locations. Despite
the best plans and intentions, properties may become
physically deteriorated and/or economically inviable. In
such places, city intervention may be need to facilitate
redevelopment and prevent the spread of blight. This
intervention may include:
► Acquisition of land.
► Preparation of sites for development.
► Construction or reconstruction of public
improvements.
► Provision of adequate parking supply.
► Remediation of polluted land as needed.
► Removal of other physical and economic barriers
to achieve community objectives.
These actions may require the use of tax increment
financing, tax abatement, or other finance tools
available to the City.
Development Strategies
The following strategies will be used to implement
the Comprehensive Plan in the area of Economic
Development:
1. The City must use the Comprehensive Plan
to provide adequate locations for future job -
producing development (Places to Work).
2. The City should adhere to the Comprehensive Plan
to encourage stable business setting and promote
investment and expansion of facilities.
3. The City should coordinate utility planning
and manage other development to ensure that
expansion areas are capable of supporting new
development in a timely manner.
4. The City will continue to work with existing
businesses to maintain an excellent business
environment, retain jobs, and facilitate expansions.
5. In addition to assisting business seeking to locate
in Monticello, the City should actively target and
market to businesses which will be a supplier,
customer or collaborative partner to existing
businesses within the community.
6. The City should target and market to businesses
which would benefit from Monticello's utility and
communications infrastructure.
7. The City will work with the CentraCare Health
System to ensure the retention and to promote the
expansion of health care services in Monticello.
8. The City will use the Comprehensive Plan to
maintain and enhance the quality of life in
Monticello as a tool for attracting businesses and
jobs.
2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-7
Ideally, the Comprehensive Plan does not have an Economic Development
chapter. The Land Use Plan would be sufficient to channel market forces
to meet the development objectives of the community. In reality, certain
development needs cannot be met without public intervention. The
Economic Development chapter of the Plan focuses on the aspects of
Monticello's future that require particular attention and action by the City.
These actions include:
► Attracting and retaining jobs
► Expanding the tax base
► Enhancing the economic vitality of Downtown
► Facilitating redevelopment
Attracting and Retaining Jobs
The creation and retention of jobs is one of the most important objectives
for Monticello. Jobs, particularly jobs with income levels capable of
supporting a family, are key to achieving many elements of Monticello's
vision for the future.
► Jobs attract residents to the community. Jobs will pay a critical role in
creating the type of "move up" housing sought by the City.
► Jobs provide the income needed to support local business and
government services.
► Retention of businesses promote community stability by keeping jobs
and residents in Monticello.
The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan contains a
section on Employment. This section contains data about employment in
Monticello and of its residents. Among the key findings in this section are:
► While the community added nearly 5,000 people between 2000 and
2010 according to the U.S. Census, it only added 1,430 jobs according
to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). In 2010,
the community had 6,992 jobs according to the QCEW but 7,093
people in the labor force according to the Census.
2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-1
► The U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic
Studies' OntheMap website shows that in 2010
4,597 people leave the community each day to
work, while 3,849 people come into the community
to work. Only 835 both live and work in the
community.
► Approximately 15% of residents in 2010 are
employed within the community. This has dropped
from 18% in 2002.
► As shown in Figure 4.1, 2012 data from the
Minnesota Department of Employment and
Economic Development (DEED) on their
mnprospector.com website shows that Monticello
is made up of a wide range of small to medium
sized employers. Only 10 employers have more
than 100 employees. Over half have fewer than
four (4) employees.
► Workers for Monticello businesses come primarily
from Monticello and the surrounding region.
Nearly 75% of people working in Monticello live in
Monticello, adjacent townships, or other places in
Wright and Sherburne counties (2010 OntheMap).
► Nearly 40% of Monticello residents work in
Hennepin County, with the largest percentage in
Minneapolis, Plymouth, and Maple Grove. Another
15% work elsewhere in Wright County, including
Buffalo and St. Michael.
► The 2007-2011 American Community Survey
(ACS) Census reported a mean travel time to work
of 28.5 minutes. This is up from the 2000 Census
travel time of 24 minutes. The mean travel time in
the 2007-2011 ACS was 29.7 minutes for Wright
County and 24.5 minutes for the region overall.
Figure 4-1:2012 Total Establishments by Size
1-4 Employees
254
52.05
5-9 Employees
97
19.88
10-19 Employees
64
13.11
20-49 Employees
42
8.61
50-99 Employees
21
4.30
100-249 Employees
7
1.43
250-499 Employees
2
0.41
500-999 Employees
1
0.20
Background Reports
The City of Monticello conducts studies and assessments
as needed to help guide its economic development
efforts. The findings and recommendations of these
studies are summarized below with the most recent
provided first.
2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research (BR&E)
Report
Monticello's Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E)
program was initiated by the City of Monticello, the
Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Industry,
DEED, and the University of Minnesota Extension. It
was also sponsored by over a dozen local businesses.
Through the BR&E program, 60 businesses were
visited. Findings from the visits and data analysis found:
► 78% of the visited businesses were locally owned
and operated.
► 20% of businesses were in manufacturing, 18% in
retail trade, and 13% in other services.
► The businesses employed over 1,600 full-time and
975 part-time employees, with a trimmed average
(an average where the low and high were discarded
to prevent skewing) of 15.38 full-time employees,
slightly down from 15.52 three years ago. The
firms also had a trimmed average of 7.76 part-time
employees, up from 6.96 three years ago.
► Most full-time employees are in manufacturing,
food and beverage, retail trade, and medical, while
part-time employees are in medical, retail trade,
and tourism/recreational services.
► Survey results indicated that the medical industry
is the highest employer in Monticello, followed by
retail trade and manufacturing.
► Businesses in the community are fairly stable with
about half expecting some type of change.
The BR&E identified four strategies aimed at helping
businesses become more profitable. Each strategy
was accompanied by a list of potential projects
intended to be ideas for the community to explore.
The implementation of the projects is intended to be
a collaborative effort among the various sectors of the
community. The four strategies identified included:
4-2 1 Economic Development City of Monticello
► Improve Business Retention and Expansion
Through Technical and Development Assistance.
► Improve Labor Force Availability and Productivity.
► Improve Infrastructure to Help Move Goods,
Customers, and the Labor Force More Efficiently.
► Improve and Promote the Quality of Life in
Monticello.
During the 2013 comprehensive plan economic
development update process, it was noted that the 2010
Business Retention and Expansion Research strategies
were similar to the 2008 Development Strategies. The
review process identified the need to continue similar
strategies into the future.
Preceding the development of the 2008 Comprehensive
Plan an assessment was conducted by St. Cloud State
University to determine whether a bioscience park
should be established in Monticello. At that time the
bioscience industry was an economic development
focus statewide. While the attraction of a bioscience
business is not a particular focus of Monticello today,
there are findings of that study that can be useful to
consider in the overall development of economic
development strategies for the community.
Some of the Monticello's strengths for attracting
businesses included:
► Land availability (compared to Metro Area).
► Access to major highways (I-94, U.S. 10 and STH
25).
► Regional growth of employment base.
► Development of local fiber optic system.
► Proximity to universities.
► Overall location.
► Expansive park system.
► Monticello Community Center.
Recommended business development activities that
apply to the attraction and retention of all businesses
include ensuring that there are sites suitable and
attractive to potential businesses available and ready
for development. The community should continue to
explore and establish partnerships with a variety of
stakeholders that can work together to support business
attraction and retention. This includes the identification
of funding sources which may be an incentive for
businesses locating in Monticello. When available the
City should participate in special tax zones that have
been made available at the state and federal level to
support business development and retention.
Expanding the Tax Base
A traditional objective of local economic development
planning is the expansion of the property tax base.
Under the current system of local government finance,
property taxes are the largest source of city revenue.
For this reason, it is an important aspect of economic
development planning in Monticello.
Understanding the Property Tax System
Effective strategies to promote the growth of the tax
base require a clear understanding of the property tax
system.
Property Valuation
There are three forms of property valuation. The
foundation of the property tax system is Estimated
Market Value. This amount is the value of a parcel
of property as set by the County Assessor. In some
circumstances, the State Legislature limits the amount
of Estimated Market Value that can be used for taxation.
These adjustments result in the Taxable Market Value.
The value used to calculate property taxes is Tax
Capacity. Tax Capacity Value is a percentage of Taxable
Market Value. The percentage factors are set by the
State Legislature and vary by class of property.
Changes in the Tax System
Traditional economic development theory seeks
commercial and industrial development as a means of
building tax base. Historically, the system supported
this approach. A dollar of estimated market value of
commercial -industrial property carried a higher tax
capacity value than residential property. Over the past
twelve years, tax "reforms" by the State Legislature have
changed this situation.
2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-3
CITY OF
monff(do
Destination
Innovation
PID
Owner
Size (Acres)
2013 Taxes
Zoning
.1. ........1.55.-.171...-.000030
..............................7.
X..Bowers. LLC ...................................................................................19.09..........................................$84.1.00....................................B.-4................
2.........155.-.171-,000040
...............................John..Chadwi
ck..Farms.LLC...............................................
1.9.09. .........................................
$8.78,00.. ..................................
B.-4................
3.........1.55.-.125-.000040
..............................
Ocello..LLC...................................................................................................1...1.,8.5..........................................$6.,452.00
...............................
.B.-3................
4.........1.55.
-.125-.0......411.0 ..............................
Wells. Fargo. Bank.NA................................................................6,28.............................................$6.,042.00...............................B-3.................
5.........1.55.-.125-.000070
..............................
Ocello.. LLC.................................................................................................12.96..........................................$7,.055.00...............................B.-3................
6.........155-500-.142210
..............................
City..of.Monticello...........................................................................4.1.1..............................................$0..00............................................B.-3................
.7...........155.-.151-,003010
..............................
Bradley.&. Sharon.,Larson.....................................................1.78..............................................$2.,950.00...............................B.-4................
s......1.5.5...1.5.7...00.1.0.1.0
............................Ghana..Prop.exti�s..l~waxy...LP.............................................5.............................................$.G.,..G8.Q..............................B-4.
... ... ... ...
9.........15.5.-.157-.00.102................................
rma..Property.LLC.....................................................................1.67.............................................$9.,.424.0..0...............................
B.-4................
10 ...1.55
171...001021 ...............................4.134
Deegan Av..enue.NE.LLC......................................1.1.6.............................................$6,304.00...............................B-4................
1.1.....1.55.-.174-.00.1010
..............................
Ghana.. Properties. Family. LP..........................................0.90.............................................$4.,482.00...............................
B.-4................
.12.....1.55
151...004010..............................Ohana.
Properties Family.LP..........................................0.57.............................................$2>.476,00...............................B-4................
13.....155.-.193-00,1020
..............................
Highland. Bank...................................................................................
7.02.............................................$7,984.00...............................
B.-`1................
14 ...1.55
164..000030..............................City
of Monticello..........................................................................7.20.............................................$0.00...........................................B-4................
15.....15.5-164-000050
..............................City..
of Monticello...........................................................................2.1.4.............................................$0.00
...................................................................................
B-4
16.....155-164-000040
..............................City.
of Monticello ...........................................................................6.14.............................................$0.OO............................................B-4................
17
155 176..002011...............................City
...... ........
of Monticello...........................................................................1.29...........................................
....... ............. .................
............
.. $0 OO............................................B-4................
.....
18.....155-.176-00,1020
..............................City..of
Monticello...........................................................................2.70.............................................$0..00............................................B.-4................
19 ...155-164-000020
..............................City
of Monticello...........................................................................2.83.............................................$0.00...........................................B-4................
20.
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
155-210-001010
Kleinbank
1.80
$6,160.00
B-3
2.1.....155-221-000010
..............................Quad
Development LLC ......................................................3.80.............................................$6,474.00...............................B-4
..............
22.
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
155-227-000010
Ocello LLC
43.15
$0.00
B-4
23,.....155.-500-142400
...............................John
& Mary Lundsten...........................................................38.87.........................................$.1,628.00...............................B.-3.................
24.
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
155-213-001010
Glen & Lois Posusta
1.79
$9,800.00
B-3
....
25.....155-500-142303
..............................
Cityof Monticello...........................................................................3.07.............................................$$0.00............................................B-3
...........................................................................
.............................................
...........................................
. ................
26.15.5.-500-142300
..............................City
of Monticello
3.20
$0.00
B.-3................
27.
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
155-500-142104
Premier Bank Minnesota
18.31
$29,934.00
B-4
28.....155-01.8-001020
..............................
Ci..y..of.Monticello...........................................................................5.1.1..............................................$0..00............................................
B.-2................
29.
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
155-037-001010
Kean of Monticello, Inc
1.92
$4,938.00
B-2
30.....155-050-000020
Joseph Lofromboise Trust
..............................................................................................................................................
3.13
$3 340.00
..........................................................................
IBC
3.1.....155-029-002130
..............................G&E
Properties LLC..................................................................4.1.8..............................................$5,302.00...............................IBC
..............
32.....155-029-002120
..............................G&E
Properties LLC..................................................................2,03..............................................$2.:.940.00...............................IBC...............
33 ...155
029..002110..............................G&E.
Properties LLC..................................................................2.1.1..............................................$3>.054.00..............................IBC...............
34.....155-029-,002,100
..............................G&E
Properties..LLC..................................................................2.20.............................................$3.,.186.00...............................IBC...............
35
l..5..5. -.0.2..9..-.0.0.2.0.9..O .............................G&.E
Properties LLC
2.28............................................$3,300.00..............................IBC...............
36.
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
155-029-002050
Kenneth Maus
5.40
.$ ,230.00
IBC
37.....155-068-00.1010
..............................
Riverwood. Bank...............................................................................19.35..........................................$30,286.00...........................
B.-3.................
38.
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
155-185-001010
State of Minnesota
1.58
$0.00
B-3
39.....155-202-,00,1060
..............................IRET.Properties.................................................................................0,51..............................................$0..00............................................
B.-3.................
40.....15.5.-079-00101.0
..............................Tyoti
RPatel..............................................................................................0.79.............................................$0.00............................................B.-3.................
41.
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
155-011-000171
Monticello Industrial Park
40.83
$0.00
B2/IBC.
42.....155-212-001010
..............................Ryan
Companies US INC....................................................1.54.............................................$0.00............................................B.-4................
43 ...1.55
212..001030 ............................
Kean of.Monticello, Inc.......................................................1.09.............................................$0
OO............................................B-4................
44.....155-178-002030
..............................Ryan
Companies US INC ....................................................1.27.............................................$0.OO............................................B.-4................
45 ...155
205..001020
.............. Ryan Companies US INC
................................................................1,87.............................................$0
OO...........................................B-4................
46.....1.5.5-117-002010
..............................MMC
Land Company LLC..............................................5.04.............................................$0.00............................................B.-4................
47
155 117-001030
MMC Company LLC...
2.24 ........
$0 00
B-4 ..............
48.....1.55.-086-000010
..............................
SPO.. LLC.......................................................................................................0.95.............................................$0..00............................................
B.-2................
49.....1.5.5.-.196-.000020
..............................Monticello..
Industrial. Park, ..Inc ...................................1.4
..............................................
$263.00 .....................................
-PUD..._
JKMonticello Destination for Innovation
Updated: 4/2016
CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS
Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts
Subsection (C) Industrial and Business Campus District
Section 3.6 (C)
IBCIndustrial and Business Campus District
The purpose of the "IBC" industrial business campus
district is to provide for the establishment of limited
light industrial business offices, limited light
manufacturing, wholesale showrooms and related uses
in an environment which provides a high level of
amenities, including landscaping, preservation of
natural features, architectural controls, and other
features.
Base Lot Area
• Minimum = 8,000 sq ft.
Base Lot Width
• Minimum= 100 ft.
Typical IBC Lot Configuration
Typical IBC Building Types
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 123
CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS
Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts
Subsection (C) Industrial and Business Campus District
REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) [I]
Max Height (stories Max Floor Area Max Impervious (%
Front Interior Street Rear / feet) Ratio (FAR) of gross lot area)
Side Side
2 stories
All Uses 50 30 50 40 30 feet (Reserved) (Reserved)
[2]
[ 1 ]: When any yard abuts a zoning district other than I -I or 1-2, the setbacks for the abutting yard must be
50 feet.
[2]: Multi -story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.4(D)contingent upon
strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted
in Title 4. Chapter I of the Monticello City Code.
Accessory
Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures.
Additional In the IBC district, every effort shall be made to preserve natural ponding areas and features of the land
Regulations to create passive open space.
■
Section 3.3. Common District Reauirements
Other
Section 3.60. Standards ADDlicable to All Industrial Base Zoning Districts
Regulations
Section 4.1. LandscaDinQ_ and Screening_ Standards
to Consult
Section 4.5. Signs
(not all
inclusive)
Section 4.8. Off -Street Parking
Section 4.9. Off -Street Loading
■
Section 4.11. Buildine Materials
is Lots must be a minimum ioo feet wide and more than
8000 square feet in total size
z: Front yard and side street setbacks of 50 feet
are required
3: High amenities and natural
features are to highlight
development in the IBC
district
4: Maximum
structure height of
30 feet unless
otherwise authorized by
conditional use permit
Z .
3
5.30 foot interior side yard setbacks required
r9o' Max Ht
6. Landscaped parking islands required every 24 spaces in the IBC district
7. Parking areas set back a minimum of 6 feet from property lines
#f jr ��
�• lhdal'strj71
Page 124 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
Section 3.6 (D)
1.1 Light Industrial District
The purpose of the "I-1," light industrial, district is
to provide for the establishment of warehousing
and light industrial development.
Base Lot Area
• Minimum = 20,000 square feet
Base Lot Width
• Minimum= 100 feet
Typical 1-1 Lot Configuration
CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS
Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts
Subsection (D) 1-I: Light Industrial District
Typical 1-1 Building Types
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 125
CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS
Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts
Subsection (D) I -I: Light Industrial District
REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) [1]
Max Height (stories Max Floor Area Max Impervious (%
Front Interior Street Rear / feet) Ratio (FAR) of gross lot area)
Side Side
All Uses 30 15 30 15 2 stories (Reserved) (Reserved)
30 feet [2]
[ I ]: When any yard abuts a zoning district other than I -I or 1-2, the setbacks for the abutting yard must be
50 feet.
[2]: Multi -story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.40) contingent upon
strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted
in Title 4. Chapter I of the Monticello City Code.
Accessory
Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures.
■
Section 3.3. Common District Requirements
Other
Section 3.60. Standards ADDlicable to All Industrial Base Zoning Districts
Regulations •
Section 4.1. LandscaDlne and Screening_ Standards
to Consult
Section 4.5. Signs
(not all
Section 4.8. Off -Street Parking
inclusive)
Section 4.9. Off -Street Loading
■
Section 4.11. Building Materials
is Minimum street side yard setback of 30 feet.
2: Minimum front yard setback of
3: Minimum lot width of ioo 4et
4: Light manufacturing plant as a
permitted use
5: Interior side yard setbacks cf
15 feet
6: Minimum lot size of 2o,000
square feet
7: Rear yard setback of 15 feet,
-20.000 SF MINIMUM
Page 126 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.1 Use Table
Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure
Residential Uses
5.2(C)(1)
Attached Dwelling Types
5.2(C)(21(a)
- Duplex
p
C
5.2(C)(2)(b)
- Townhouse
C
p
M
5.2(C)(2)(c)
- Multiple -Family
C
P
C
C
5.2(C)(2)(d)
Detached Dwelling
p
p p
p
p
p
None
Group Residential
P
P P
P
P
5.2(C)(3)
Facility, Single Family
Group Residential
C
C
C
5.2(C)(3)
Facility, Multi -Family
Mobile & Manufactured
C
C
C
P
C
5.2(C)(4)
Home / Home Park
Civic & Institutional Uses
Active Park Facilities
P
P P
P
P
P
P
PP
P
P p p
p p
None
(public)
Active Park Facilities
P
P P
P
P
P
P
5.2(D)(I)
(private)
Assisted Living Facilities
C
p
C
I
5.2(D)(2)
Cemeteries
C
C C
C
C
C
C
C
P
P
C
5.2(D)(3-)!
None
Clinics/Medical Services
Essential Services
P
P
P
P P
P
P P
None
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Hospitals
C
PIN
P
C
5.2(D)-(4-)
Nursing/Convalescent
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
PP
5.2(D)(5)
Home
Passenger Terminal
C
C C
C
None
Passive Parks and Open
P
P P
P
P
P
P
P P
P
P P
p
p
p
None
Space
Place of Public Assembly
C
C
C
C
C
p
C
5.2(D)(6)
Public Buildings or Uses
C
C C
C
C
C
C
P C
C
P P
C
P
P
5.2(D)(7)
Schools, K-12
C
C
C
C
C
C
I
I
5.2(D)(8)
Schools, Higher1
None
EducationF
C
Utilities (major)
C
C
C
5.2(D)(9)
Office Uses
Offices
■
��
P
P
C P
P
P
P
5.2(E1
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 319
CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.1 Use Table
Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure
Commercial Uses
Adult Uses
Auction House
Auto Repair — Minor
Automotive Wash Facilities
Bed & Breakfasts
Boarding House
Brew Pub
Business Support Services
Commercial Lodging
Communications/Broadcasting
Convenience Retail
Country Club
Day Care Centers
Entertainment/Recreation,
Indoor Commercial
Entertainment/Recreation,
Outdoor Commercial
Financial Institution
Funeral Services
Kennels (commercial)
Landscaping/ Nursery
Business
Personal Services
Production Brewery or
Micro -Distillery without
Taproom
Production Brewery or
Micro -Distillery with
Taproom or Cocktail Room
Recreational Vehicle Camp
Site
Repair Establishment
Restaurants
Retail Commercial Uses
(other)
Specialty Eating
Establishments
C C
P C
�����
C
C•
C
P
C•
CICI IP
I P P
C C
P C P
PI IP
CI PI PIP
CIC
CP P
C P P
P P P
C I P P P
PP
C
PIP
P OP
P
P
I P C I a
3.7(K1
5.2(F)(2)
5.2(F)(3)
5.2(F)(4)
5.2(F)(5)
5.2(F)(6)
5.2(F)(7)
None
5.2(F)(8)
5.2(F)(9)
5.2(F)(1 O)
5.2(F)(II)
5.20 (12)
5.2(F)(I 3
5.2(F)(14)
5.2(F)(I 5)
5.2(F)(I 6)
5.2(F)(I 7
5.2(F)(I 8
5.2(F)(22)
5.2(G)(I 01
5.2(F)(24)
5.2(G)(I 11)
5.2(F)(25)
5.2(F)(26)
5.2(F)(27)
5.2(F)(28)
5.2(F)(29)
Page 320 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS
Section 5.1 Use Table
Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure
Vehicle fuel Sales C C CI 1� 5.2(F)(30)
Vehicle Sales and Rental C 5.2(F)(31)
Veterinary Facilities C 5.2(F)(32)
(Rural)
Veterinary Facilities C C C 5.20(32)
(Neighborhood)
Wholesale Sales P P P None
Industrial Uses
Auto Repair — Major C �P P 5.2(G)(I)
Bulk Fuel Sales and P P 5.2(G)(2)
Storage
Contractor's Yard,
Temporary 5.2(G 3
Extraction of Materials I I I 5.2(G)(4)
General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(G)(5)
Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(G)(6)
Industrial Services C P None
Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(G)(7)
Light Manufacturing P P P 5.2(6)(8)
Machinery/Truck Repair
P P 5.2(G)(9)
& Sales
Recycling and Salvage
C C 5.2(G)( 10)
Center
Self -Storage Facilities P C P 5.2(G)( I1)
Truck or Freight C P P 5.2 G I2
Terminal
Waste Disposal &
IC 5.2(�(13)
Incineration
Wrecker Services C P 5.20(14)
Commercial Day Care
Commercial Lodging
C
P
C C C
P C
none
none
5.2(F)( 12
5.2(F)(8)
City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 321
CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS
Section S. I Use Table
Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure
Commercial Recreation:
Outdoor
Convenience Retail
Funeral Services
Medical / Clinical Services
Personal Services
Places of Public Assembly
Production Brewery or Micro -
Distillery with Taproom or
Cocktail Room
Professional Office -Services
Including Financial Institutions
Restaurants, Bars < 10,000 SF
Restaurants, Bars > 10,000 SF
Retail Sales < 10,000 SF
Retail Sales > 10,000 SF
Retail with Service
Specialty Eating Establishments
< 10,000 SF
Vehicle Fuel Sales
Veterinary Facilities
Residential
— Upper Floors
Residential
— Street Level
Residential
— Multiple Family
Residential
— Townhouse
Residential
— Single Family
Industrial PUD
Public Buildings or Uses
C C none
C P* C C *F-2 Drive Through by CUP
— C
C
=
none
L-2:
NA first floor,
C P
P
P
CUP upper floors
P P
P
P L-3:
CUP
C C
C
C
none
C C C C
P P P C
P P C C
P C C
P P C C
P C C
P C C
P* P* C* P*
C C C*
C P C C
none
L-2: NA first floor,
CUP upper floors
none
none
none
none
L-2: NA first floor,
CUP upper floors
*Drive Through by CUP
L-8 only
none
P P P P L-2: NA
WrC C L-2: NA
C C L-2: NA
C none
C none
L-3: PUD Only
C I C I C I P I none
5.2(F)(14)
5.2U(! 0)
5.2U(! 6)
5.2U(! 9)
5.20(22)
5.2(F)(23)
5.2(F)(24)
5.2 F 15
5.2(F)(2 1)
5.20 (27)
5.20 (27)
5.2(F)(28)
5.20(28)
5.20(28)
5.20(29)
5.20(30)
5.20(32)
Page 322 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
Interchange Map Option #1
Legend
Proposed Land Uses
0 Commercial
W Industrial
Medium Density Residential
Single Family Residential
Gross Land Use Acres:
Single Family Residential 1,499 Ac.
Medium Density Residential 223 Ac.
Commercial 248 Ac.
Industrial 116 Ac.
Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW,
but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed):
Single Family Residential 1040 Ac.
Medium Density Residential 146 Ac.
Commercial 193 Ac.
Industrial 103 Ac.
Existing Land Uses
Commercial
Industrial
OInterchange Area
/��� Parks and Open Space
r--------
i City Boundary
-----■ Proposed Roads
Existing Roads
CConcept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor)
Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands)
Parcels
N
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.
Or/
4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valle V. MN 55422
Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com
Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County
February 8, 2016
120TH
Birch
Unnamed
a
m
100TH Ud La.
g
Bertram Lake /
1 /
m
0 0
0
0
170TH
r --
r
E
Interchange Map Option #2
Legend
Proposed Land Uses
0 Commercial
W Industrial
Medium Density Residential
Single Family Residential
Gross Land Use Acres:
Single Family Residential 940 Ac.
Medium Density Residential 123 Ac.
Commercial 123 Ac.
Industrial 184 Ac.
Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW,
but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed):
Single Family Residential 769 Ac.
Medium Density Residential 115 Ac.
Commercial 44 Ac.
Industrial 155 Ac.
Existing Land Uses
Commercial O Interchange Area
Industrial
Parks and Open Space
i --------i City Boundary
-----■ Proposed Roads
Existing Roads
Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor)
Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands)
Parcels
N
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.
4150 Olson Memorial HighwaV, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Telephone: 763.957.110^ Website: www.nacplanning.com
Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County
120TH
Unnamed
Birch
1
1
_. -�
i
o First Lake
1
100TH /Mud Lake
99TH ;
Lake z
Bertram Lake � �/ / 9
I
3 u
z
Interchange Map Option #3
Legend
Proposed Land Uses
0 Commercial
W Industrial
Medium Density Residential
Single Family Residential
Gross Land Use Acres:
Single Family Residential 1,235 Ac.
Medium Density Residential 140 Ac.
Commercial 405 Ac.
Industrial 466
Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW,
but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed):
Single Family Residential 941 Ac.
Medium Density Residential 127 Ac.
Commercial 249 Ac.
Industrial 303
Existing Land Uses
Commercial
Industrial
Parks and Open Space
r--------
i City Boundary
-■ Proposed Roads
Existing Roads
OInterchange Area
Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor)
Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands)
Parcels
N
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.
4150 Olson Memorial Hiqhway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN S5422
Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com
Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County
February 8, 2016
Interchange Map Option #4
No Build
Legend
Proposed Land Uses
1w— Medium Density Residential
Single Family Residential
Gross Land Use Acres:
Single Family Residential 1,172 Ac.
Medium Density Residential 123 Ac.
Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW,
but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed):
Single Family Residential 919 Ac.
Medium Density Residential 73 Ac.
Existing Land Uses
Commercial
Industrial
Parks and Open Space
r--------
i City Boundary
------ Proposed Roads
Existing Roads
Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor)
Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands)
Parcels
N
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.
4150 Olson MemonaI Highway, Ste. 320, 'en valley, MN 55422
Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacl)lanning.com
Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County
March 1, 2016
Legend
I
— — I
ICit of Monticello
I
i
Off ici I Zoning M P
� � I
\ 1 I
\ \ I
\ \ I
\� I
\ I
\ \ I
\ o I
\\ 3
\ � I
\
\ I
� I I
---------—
c
--- ----_ I
— — — — — — — — — — — —I
\ Praire Rd Hi
W E
I
\ I
� I
e�, I
BASE ZONING DISTRICTS
d
Residential DistrictsBusiness Districts i
-- Low Residential Densities-
\ (k Kama w3 d i i
AO
R -A
R-1
-- Medium Residential Densities
T -N
R-2
C R -PUD
-- High Residential Densities
8-2
8-3
. 8-4
CCD
Industrial Districts
] pec
1-1
R-3 ----------,
01 Swan River
--------- ; Monticello
M -H'
PUDs
L-------- High School
OTHER
Water
OVERLAY DISTRICTS
----------1
03 il Mills Fleet Farm
----------1
04 1 Red Rooster
Performance Based Overlay District
Special Use Overlay District
Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District
Shoreland District
I
Freeway Bonus Sign District
• • \\��� ` I � c Sys ; h ., � � —
\ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
jfJ/yI►.J[
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — i
I[IIiijm
MAN
►■ �■ IIIII �C
U � !i ■S =
1111■ ■ 11111111
}
--------
City Council Agenda — 06/26/17
4C. Consideration to approve a Development Stage Planned Unit Development and
Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner for Office, Service, and Warehouse Uses in
the Red Rooster Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Red Rooster Properties,
Inc. (NAC)
Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 2 (with exceptions), Oakwood
Industrial Park; PID 155018002012
Address: 100 Chelsea Road
Planning Case Number: 2017-016
A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND:
Request(s): Request to subdivide an existing parcel with multiple
buildings to accommodate a new user on the western
parcel, and development of a new principal use building
and accessory use storage building on newly subdivided
parcel for commercial/industrial purposes, through an
amendment to an existing Planned Unit Development.
Deadline for Decision: July 101h, 2017
Land Use Designation: Places to Shop
Zoning Designation: PUD, Planned Unit Development
The purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development
District is to provide greater flexibility in the
development of neighborhoods and non-residential
areas in order to maximize public values and achieve
more creative development outcomes while remaining
economically viable and marketable. This is achieved
by undertaking a process that results in a development
outcome exceeding that which is typically achievable
through the conventional zoning district. The City
reserves the right to deny the PUD rezoning and direct
the developer to re -apply under the standard applicable
zoning district.
Overlays/Environmental
Regulations Applicable: NA
Current Site Use: Commercial/Industrial buildings for storage and office
Surrounding Land Uses:
North: Commercial
City Council Agenda — 06/26/17
East: Industrial
South: Industrial
West: Vacant Commercial
Project Description: The applicant is seeking approval of a subdivision to
separate a portion of the existing development, with
multiple buildings, to accommodate occupancy of a
portion of the property by a new user, and development
of new buildings for the applicant's commercial/
industrial uses. Both sites would contain a combination
of office and storage uses for separate businesses.
ANALYSIS
Background. The subject property received a Planned Unit Development zoning and
approval in 2016 to accommodate the occupancy of the site by the current applicant.
That PUD approval permitted the use of the site for office and storage uses by the
applicant, as well as limited storage for certain civic organizations seeking temporary
storage of equipment used in public events.
The 2016 PUD approval accommodated the change in use (from a previous church
ownership), and incorporated the then -current level of site improvements, which
included fencing, landscaping, and a paved parking lot along the north portion of the
site. As a former building materials sales yard, the bulk of the site surrounding the
four remaining buildings on the site was unpaved.
The proposed project would divide the site into two parcels along a north -south
boundary between the westerly 3 buildings and the east portion of the site, which
includes a portion of the paved parking, a large concrete pad location of a previous
building, and one existing storage building in the southeast corner of the property.
The westerly site would be sold to a user that would occupy the main building for
office, shop, and storage purposes for an industrial service use. The other two
existing buildings are proposed to be used for storage, essentially in their current
condition, and for purposes similar to those approved in the 2016 PUD.
The easterly site would be occupied by the applicant, and would include a new
building in the northeast corner of the property, along with a new parking lot, a future
ability to construct an additional accessory building on the empty concrete pad, and
use of the existing building for storage.
The two parcels would continue to share the current driveway access in common
under a cross -parking and access agreement.
OJI
City Council Agenda — 06/26/17
As noted above, the applicant would use the east parcel, including the new building,
the future building, and the existing accessory buildings for the same uses previously
approved for the entire parcel under the 2016 PUD. The conditions of that approval
included the following:
Any expansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the
limited accessory non-commercial self -storage identified in the PUD
Site Plan and Narrative shall be subject to an amendment to Planned
Unit Development and may require additional improvements, including,
but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater, and screening.
2. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment shall be permitted in the
PUD.
3. Paving and circulation on the site shall be subject to the review and
comment of the City Engineer.
4. The applicant enter into a PUD and Development Agreement for the
site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions.
5. Conditions recommended by other City staff or the Planning
Commission.
It is expected that these conditions would carry over to the current PUD project. With
regard to new items and proposed improvements raised by the current proposal, staff
makes the following observations and recommendations.
Existinz Building. The applicant is seeking approval for an Industrial Services use
(building maintenance), with accessory office and storage uses within the existing
building.
Future Building. The applicant is seeking approval of both the first proposed
building, and an additional future building to be located on the empty concrete pad,
which had previously contained a separate building. No plans or details for the future
building have been provided at this time.
Staff is recommending that if the City chooses to approve both the proposed and
future buildings with this PUD, that the future building approval includes conditions
that would require the extension of paved circulation, adequate parking (also paved),
building materials and design to be consistent with the existing building on Lot 1,
approval of all stormwater and utility recommendations of the City Engineer, and
compliance with all other zoning regulations. The future building use should be
solely as accessory storage for the principal use in the proposed new building.
Landscaping. The existing and proposed landscaping is consistent with the City's
zoning regulations, based primarily on previous landscaping requirements imposed at
3
City Council Agenda — 06/26/17
the time of the church occupancy, and then the 2016 PUD. The applicant is
proposing to add two deciduous trees to the front yard adjacent to Chelsea Road.
Parking. The proposed building is approximately 4900 square feet gross in floor
area, with a mix of office and, mostly, storage area. Estimating a maximum parking
demand for a commercial/industrial user in such a building at 1 parking space per 350
square feet, would result in a parking requirement of 14 spaces for the new building.
The proposed site plan shows 16 provided on the new parcel.
The existing building contains approximately 7800 square feet gross floor area. The
building will have a mix of office, shop, and storage space, and at the same ratio
would require 22 spaces. At least 20 paved spaces are provided, which should suffice
given internal net reductions for mechanical, restrooms, etc., and a shared
access/parking arrangement with the adjacent parcel.
Circulation. The applicant's site plan shows the limits of paving area to be consistent
with the existing fence line, which includes the front portion only of the new building.
The new building includes both overhead and service door access behind the existing
fence line, and as a condition of approval, paving should be extended to access doors
for new building, so employees or others are not driving on unpaved surfaces for
newly introduced uses.
Siznaze. The existing sign will be utilized by the new owner on the west parcel, and
small sign will be added for the new building. The proposed new sign is consistent
with the requirements for a 15 foot setback for monument/freestanding signs. No
other signage is proposed at this time. Any future signage to be added or replaced
should meet the requirements of the City's zoning regulations.
Trash Handling. The plan anticipates that trash handling equipment will be stored
inside the buildings. This would be consistent with the original PUD provisions that
prohibit outdoor storage on the property.
Buildinz Desizn/Materials. The proposed building is similar in design and materials
to the existing building; metal exterior with wood and masonry accents, as well as
glass. While the primary exterior materials are not consistent with what the City
typically expects of buildings that are in commercial areas, the site is zoned PUD, and
adjoins both commercial and industrial property. As a transitional site, the City can
consider the proposed materials to be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive
Plan. The proposed building is set back from the Chelsea Road right of way
approximately 93 feet, and 22 feet from the side (east) property line.
Lizhtinz The zoning ordinance requires that photometric lighting plan values do not
exceed 1.0 foot-candles at the property line, in commercial and industrial areas. The
submitted photometric plan shows values that are too high, but do not actually show
values at property line. The applicant should revise the photometric plan, and make
the required adjustments in lighting fixtures, to meet the requirements of the code. In
L!
City Council Agenda — 06/26/17
addition, it appears from the lighting detail that light pole height appears to be 28 feet.
This detail should be revised to meet the code requirement maximum of 25 feet or
less.
Preliminary Plat. The applicants are seeking Preliminary Plat approval as a part of
the PUD project, dividing the property along a north -south boundary into two lots, as
noted above. The plat creates parcels of 1.79 acres (westerly Lot 1) and 1.88 acres
(easterly Lot 2). Lot widths along Chelsea Road are approximately 160 feet for Lot
1, and 140.87 feet for Lot 2. As a PUD District, there are no specific lot area or width
requirements that apply. For comparison purposes, the past B-2 District would have
required 100 feet of lot width, but did not impose a minimum lot area. As noted in
the PUD discussion above (and required by Exhibit Z), the City Engineer will
comment on grading and utility aspects of the project.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing on the
requests on June 6th, 2017.
The applicant, Tom Holthaus of Red Rooster Properties, addressed the Commission,
answering questions regarding the proposed industrial service use for the existing
building on the westerly lot and the office professional uses proposed for the new
building. Mr. Holthaus confirmed that there would be two tenants in the proposed
new office building on the easterly lot, Red Rooster Properties and a realty firm. He
noted that existing storage buildings on the site would be used for storage for the
businesses on site only, with the exception of the option for continued storage for the
non-profit community organizations as approved under the original PUD. He
explained that although there is not a definitive timeline for the construction of the
proposed accessory building on the easterly lot, the current request includes the
building in the approval consideration for the PUD amendment.
The Commission discussed staff's recommendation that the applicant extend the
pavement proposed for the easterly lot's parking and access area to the rear line of the
proposed office building, as well as the requirement that the applicant pave the access
and parking areas for the proposed accessory storage building on the eastern lot when
constructed.
Commissioner Murdoff inquired whether there would be a common maintenance
agreement for the two properties. The applicant confirmed that there would be a
common access and maintenance agreement between the two properties extending
from Chelsea to the back of the property, providing for public access to Chelsea, as
well as access to the accessory buildings. It was noted that there is no access from
Edmonson into the site currently and none is proposed.
The Commission members also discussed the building materials treatment for the
proposed building on the eastern lot. It was noted that the materials are not consistent
5
City Council Agenda — 06/26/17
with the current standards for building materials in commercial districts, although the
materials proposed are consistent with the existing building on the proposed western
lot. Chairman Fyle expressed his preference for materials consistent with the
commercial building standards, or those of the industrial building adjacent to the east.
No members of the public were present to address the Planning Commission
regarding the item.
Following the discussion, the Planning Commission voted 3-1 to recommend
approval of the development stage PUD and preliminary plat, with conditions as
noted in Exhibit Z, with a revision to the pavement conditions #4 and 5 allowing for a
chip seal product in lieu of pavement. Chairman Fyle voted in dissent, stating his
preference for enhanced building materials for the proposed office building.
Council will be asked to consider final stage PUD and final plat requests at a future
date.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
The Planning Commission recommends Alternative 1 below.
Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2017- 011 recommending approval of a
Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner and Development Stage Planned Unit
Development for Red Rooster, based on the findings in said resolution, and
incorporating the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as recommended by the Planning
Commission, allowing for a chip seal or surfacing alternative acceptable to the
City Engineer in lieu of pavement for extension to the rear of the proposed office
building and accessory building.
2. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2017- 011 recommending approval of a
Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner and Development Stage Planned Unit
Development for Red Rooster, based on the findings in said resolution, and
incorporating the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as outlined in the staff report of
6/26/17.
3. Motion to deny approval of a Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner and
Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Red Rooster, based on
findings to be made by the City Council.
4. Motion to table action on approval of a Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner and
Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Red Rooster, subject to
additional information as directed.
G
City Council Agenda — 06/26/17
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner and
Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Red Rooster, consistent with
Alternative 2, with the conditions as noted in Exhibit Z. The property was originally
developed as a lumber yard with multiple metal buildings, and has seen a series of
changes to both the land use and zoning regulations, given its location at the
transition between commercial and industrial areas. The PUD accommodates uses
that have elements of both commercial and industrial activities, and the existing
development would raise separate issues in attempting to convert the site to full
compliance with commercial zoning regulations. As such, the transitional elements
of the proposal appear to be consistent with its location, and with the approvals
granted under the 2016 PUD.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Resolution PC -2017-011
B. Draft Ordinance 6X -X, amending Red Rooster PUD (to be considered with
final plat and final stage PUD requests)
C. Aerial Site Image
D. Applicant Narrative, including supplemental information
E. Development Plans, including:
a. Title Sheet
b. Site Plan
c. Grading & Erosion Control Plan
d. Utility & Removals Plan
e. Landscape Plan
f. Details
g. Photometric Plan
h. Building Elevations
i. Sign Plan
F. Preliminary Plat, Chelsea Corner
G. Drainage Calculations, Online Only
H. City Engineer's Letter, dated May 31, 2017
Z. Conditions of Approval
7
City Council Agenda — 06/26/17
EXHIBIT Z
Preliminary Plat of Chelsea Corner and Development Stage PUD
Red Rooster Properties, Inc.
100 Chelsea Road
Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park
Any expansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the
limited accessory non-commercial self -storage identified in the PUD Site
Plan and Narrative, as approved in the PUD Zoning District, shall be subject
to an amendment to Planned Unit Development and may require additional
improvements, including, but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater,
and screening.
2. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment or materials shall be
permitted in the PUD.
3. The future building made a part of this PUD shall be consistent in
materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building.
4. Paving shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office building at
the time of construction;
Paving shall be further extended to the rear corner of the future storage
building at the time of construction of said future building.
6. The applicant shall submit a site and full civil plan set showing the full set
of existing, currently proposed, and future building and site improvements
as a part of the record Final Stage PUD, including phasing of such
buildings and improvements.
7. Lighting and lighting plans in the PUD shall be revised to be consistent
with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance.
8. Signage shall meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance.
9. Paving and circulation on the site shall be subject to the review and
comment of the City Engineer.
10. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the City
Engineer, per the letter dated May 31St, 2017.
11. The applicant enter into a PUD and Development Agreement for the site
specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. The Development
N.
City Council Agenda — 06/26/17
Agreement shall be accompanied by recordable cross -access and parking
agreements for the two parcels.
12. Conditions recommended by other City staff or the Planning Commission.
0
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-011
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CHELSEA
CORNER AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR
RED ROOSTER PROPERTIES
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to subdivide its property at 100
Chelsea Road, PID No. 155-018-002012 into two parcels; and
WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for business
office and accessory storage and industrial service uses, in addition to principal storage for
organizations with no other presence on the property; and
WHEREAS, the site is guided for commercial uses under the label "Places to Shop"
in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, are consistent with
the long-term use and development of the property for commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 2017 on the
application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to
present information to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the
staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following
Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval:
1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the existing and proposed
buildings to limited use.
2. The use of the site for storage for non-profit organizations is consistent with
the City's interest in promoting civic charity work and community pride.
3. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD
are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as a transition
between commercial and industrial areas.
4. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including
sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to
serve the property for the development as proposed.
5. The PUD flexibility for the project, including modifying pavement
requirements and storage uses, are consistent with the intent of the City's
economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD
zoning regulations.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-011
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
Monticello City Council approves the Rezoning and Development Stage PUD, subject to the
conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows:
1. Any expansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the
limited accessory non-commercial self -storage identified in the PUD Site
Plan and Narrative, as approved in the PUD Zoning District, shall be subject
to an amendment to Planned Unit Development and may require additional
improvements, including, but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater,
and screening.
2. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment or materials shall be
permitted in the PUD.
3. The future building made a part of this PUD shall be consistent in
materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building.
4. Chip seal or other surfacing alternative acceptable to the City Engineer in
lieu of pavement shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office
building at the time of construction;
5. Chip seal or other surfacing alternative acceptable to the City Engineer in
lieu of pavement shall be further extended to the rear corner of the future
storage building at the time of construction of said future building.
6. The applicant shall submit a site and full civil plan set showing the full set
of existing, currently proposed, and future building and site improvements
as a part of the record Final Stage PUD, including phasing of such
buildings and improvements.
7. Lighting and lighting plans in the PUD shall be revised to be consistent
with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance.
8. Signage shall meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance.
9. Paving and circulation on the site shall be subject to the review and
comment of the City Engineer.
10. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the City
Engineer, per the letter dated May 31St, 2017.
K
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-011
11. The applicant enter into a PUD and Development Agreement for the site
specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. The Development
Agreement shall be accompanied by recordable cross -access and parking
agreements for the two parcels.
12. Conditions recommended by other City staff or the Planning Commission.
ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Brad Fyle, Chair
ATTEST:
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
3
ORDINANCE NO.6XX
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE,
KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE RED ROOSTER PUD
ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, CURRENTLY DESCRIBED AS
LOT 1, BLOCK 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 2.4(0) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is
hereby amended by amending the following:
(16) Red Rooster — Chelsea Corner PUD District
(a) Purpose. The purpose of the Red Rooster PUD District is to provide
for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for
office -commercial and industrial services land uses, including the plat
of Chelsea Corner.
(b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Red Rooster PUD
District shall be office -commercial uses as found in the B-2, Limited
Business District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, and industrial
services uses as found in the I-1, Light Industrial District of the
Monticello Zoning Ordinance subject to the approved Final Stage
Development Plans dated May 23rd, 2016, and as amended on
(Council approval date to be inserted), and development agreement
dated July 25th, 2016 and as amended on (Council approval date to
be inserted), 2017, as may be amended. The introduction of any other
use from any district, including Conditional Uses in the B-2 or I-1
Districts, shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello
Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned Unit
Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD.
(c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory
and incidental to office -commercial uses, and as specifically identified
by the approved final stage PUD plans. Accessory buildings on the
site may be utilized for indoor storage for enterprises which may or
may not occupy principal use space on the property and only
occasionally have need to utilize the facility, but shall not be operated
as self -storage available to the general public.
(d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the
development of any lot in the Red Rooster PUD District shall adhere
to the approved final stage PUD plans (including phasing plans) and
ORDINANCE NO.6XX
development agreement. In such case where any proposed
improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the
regulations of the B-2, Limited Business District shall apply.
(e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner
of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or
coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an
amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance, Section 2.4 (0)(10). The City may require that substantial
changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new
project, including a zoning district amendment.
Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amendment to rezoned the
following described parcels from B-2, Limited Business District to Red Rooster
PUD, Planned Unit Development District:
Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park.
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this
ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time.
Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance
as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to
renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended
effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary
corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process,
provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance
as has been adopted.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage
and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the
City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are
available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request.
ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this day of , 2017.
ATTEST:
Jeff O'Neill, Administrator
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
2
ORDINANCE NO.6XX
AYES:
NAYS:
Red Rooster Properties, Inc. -Request for Amdt to PUD, Development Stage PUD, & Preliminary Plat
Lot 1, Block 2 Oakwood Industrial Park 1155-018-002012 1 100 Chelsea Road
Created by: City of Monticello
April 8, 2017
Request: To split lot into two lots, add PUD amendment to accommodate split, to add building on new
lot to east.
Purpose: To accommodate sale of west portion of property and to make a more efficient use of property
that was formerly used as a lumber yard as it is unlikely that a lumber yard will be needed in Monticello.
Narrative:
Last year Red Rooster applied and was granted a PUD for this property to allow excess space to be used
for office, warehouse and self -storage uses. The permitted uses also included limited non-commercial
self -storage as an accessory use. We realized that to best utilize this property it would make most sense
to split property into two parcels and sell one parcel to someone with a similar business and with similar
needs.
We have a purchase agreement with Jovan Properties/DBA ProTech. They would be purchasing the main
building and the building to the south of the main building.They are a restoration business with 6 to 8
office employees and 6 outside sales agents. They have similar needs as they need office space and
warehouse space for equipment and supplies. They have outgrown their current location and would like
to expand further in the future. This purchase would allow that. The construction side of their business
takes place at customers locations as well as the material deliveries so their need for warehouse space is
to accommodate equipment and leftover supplies. Their outside sales agents meet once a week at the
office. The level of activity on site would be minimal.
The split would accommodate Red Rooster as we could build a new building matching our needs and
utilizing the excess space without leasing out as self storage which we do not want to do. Our needs are
similar as we have to accommodate a lot of maintenance equipment but also restaurant equipment for
replacement and repair, which takes up one of the existing buildings and then some. We are presently
donating space to the Monticello Lions and the Monticello Chamber of Commerce which basically uses
the second building. If we are to continue donating the space for the Lions and Chamber we would like
the ability to also build on the existing slab in the future to accommodate our growth in the future. We
are proposing this without improvements to the area around that building as it is not accessible to the
public, gets minimal traffic, currently has hard packed gravel base, and has a buffer of asphalt existing
before it leads to Chelsea so it doesn't leave mud or debris on the road.
We propose to split property North to South at the entrance and have a shared access on the new
property line to the South accommodating both parties that both parties would agree to maintain.
We feel that the uses described would be a good transition and fit in the current zoning and could be
accomplished with an PUD amendment and new plat.
Th� nl�lfgu
To H I aus
Red Rooster Properties, Inc.
May 5th 2017
Red Rooster Properties, Inc. understands the financial requirements for the development of the PUD of
Chelsea Corner and the financial guarantees for the completion of such improvements.
Tom Holthaus
President
May 15, 2017
RE: Application review
Dear Mr. Thunander,
Please find response to application review letter dated May 111h, 2017
Clarification of development schedule
Plan to start construction as soon as possible after final plat recording. Completion in aprox. 90 to 120
days. Future building on existing slab to be built when necessary not known at this time.
Clarification of the types of uses
Aside from Red Rooster Properties there will be one tenant Wright Sherburne Realty taking space shown
on floor plan already submitted.
Exterior lighting
Enclosed
Specific flexibilities
We believe that basically building the same type of building that exists we are complying with the
zoning, adding stone, and architectural steel on front as shown on plan.
Provide title information
Enclosed
SWPP
Enclosed
Trash handling
Inside building workshop as shown on floor plan
Site plan signatures and setbacks
Enclosed
Cross Access Agreement
Enclosed
Thanks, Tom
PROJECT BENCHMARK.•
Top of hydrant, 30 feet north of centerline of Chelsea
Road and 420 feet east of centerline of Edmonson Avenue
Elev. = 962.48 Feet (NA VD 88)
CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING:
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002
MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166
TITLE & INDEX SHEET
SITE PLAN
OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK o
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
FOR
RSD ROOSTER PROPERTIES,
SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
UTILITY & REMOVAL PLAN
LANDSCAPE PLAN
DETAILS
2
3
0
5
6-7
PINE ST, A
IAF
`rT
-o
�2
OPINE ST,
W
a
0
Ljo
Wry Z
r- cn o cn
O
�
N
LO
L f
>
`n
0 I
m
m m p
W
J O
Z Z Y
�
C�
Cn Q w
U W
Q W a� _
J
�� U
L�
c
O L-
0)0
o
ro
- °C
O
-5 ° '
U c
N
L o
°
d L N +'
O
Ln
�a—Tu°,
C;
°C 41 .61
c C
Z
° C L Lc LJ
00°
O
a�
Q
o
o�
(no
W N
0 0 +�
oi
, W \
U o�
ILC)
C
N Q-•�= J °
+,
L
Z�
N
N
O
"'
Z
00
0000
01
r7 N
n
W
Z"
p W
�(0
r
W H
W
Y
W W
m
OC7Z
i jN
Z W
M
Xw
li
W W
>z
♦R �/�
d
H N
C5 04
�wz E1
IN <5 m df Q>Q 0 W
qrE �U�
NIGH kiq Y 94
� Y
OIm m
2Q - a_U
U
PARK DR.
Q
0
F-- CHELSEA RD.
v �_ w -Site w ��
>
o o
0 Q J
3 Q Q Q
Y 7-
D
Q �
DUNDAS RD, 0
V)
Lv ry
0 LSI Z
Z �
Lv r1-- O
�
N U O
c� Q w
Z LU U �
J W
W Z >
WRIGHT COUNTY NO SCALE D _
m U : U
Section 14 Township 121, Range 25
VICINITY MAP
z
L_ — L — / — / I / I ` / / I L
Io o Io
U
SCALE IN FEET Ld
0
SCALE: 1'' = 10'
PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED PARKING SUMMARY
w
POLE Con ven tlonal Spaces 20
— — Hand/cao,oed Spaces 2
UE UEUE UE •UE \ UE UE UE • UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE •-;_- UE UE UE Total Spaces Provided 22
91, Ld�
TAPES CURB I
----- —-------
=_ ur = = =UL= = =U =_ ------ — — —--------- I� (n (n
NO JUI 11�R—UT----UT---- — — -�'— — — ---- — PROPOSED SITE DATA_
I a o I Building 27,126 SF o
I \ -
35' 15' 15' 119 I Parkin Areas /0 000 SF `n 41
Parking �
I I I Concrete Areas /0,57/ SF m
Greensnace Area 34.273 SF 0° m o Ld
5 �- Tota/ Parcel Area 8/, 970 SF w z z w E zz
I - ~ Cn J
O I o 0 LLJ
0 0 0
N c
SBL SBL SBL SBL SBL SBL I I � &RL� SBL SBL SBL SBL ';BL SBL BL SB .2 L
L N
/ U-0C,C O
N
I I;o� O
I 9 aL Ln
o
I I
1011 -' i I 1 EXIST/NG ZON/NG: B-2 (Limited Business District) � �, + o, � z
1 Minimum Lot Area: No Minimum o E
r 9 Minimum Lot Width: l00 feet z
N , O
C1.2
C 0 0�
I m
I I I
N
I I SETBACKS: — g
PROPOSED PARKING
�� —Denotes buildin setback lines: o a,o � � Q
I I _ (B-2) Limited Business District
Q• o � (n o
I Vk L<, STALLS, TYP. �, Front Yard Setback: 30 feet WIr 612 CURB, TYP. Rear Yard Setback: 20 feet o
Side Yard Setback: l0 feetvrn OROPOSED1 / 1 r
I I I O I ZV N
BITUMINOUS , I SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES O Z 100
I I I A V E M E N T 1. All dimensions are to top back of curb unless n o N
I I ,
N I I o otherwise noted. � �N
m , N 2. All proposed curb to be MNDOT Design B-612 Q W
except where noted. W wX
I , I
J. All parking lot striping to be marked with a Q w<
74' s I a/ky/d-based paint and MnDOT 2564 specific with n m N
coats anleast w
I 2 td at /t 4" wide. z N
r c�zao
I I J A^ ° ° ° ° ° ° ° A ° a ° ° ° 1 4. All concrete ramps, sidewalks and van accessible ,' � N N
d
I I N ° ° ° d ° e ° handicapped parking stalls to conform to current a y �C �N
°a ° N i
I , ro
° A.D.A. requirements. Q U) z Z
wz ,��
° 5. Typical full size 90° parking stall is 9' X 20' 0 C) _j
��' I �a unless otherwise noted. O� Q -a ow
I _jU� –�
° Im
allo I , °
I N
I I I14
I II
MILIJ AND MATCH PEDESTRIAN I PROPOSED 1
LEGEND:
I ► E . BITUMINOUS , a°CURB RAMP CONCRETE
PANE ENT SECTION ° I SIDEWALK Denotes sanitary manhole
I I I ° I ° Denotes telephone pedestal I
° I ° a I Denotes cu/vert
I 6 I I
° I Denotes Tree, Coniferous
�— I I I I ° I
da d Q W I I , I ° `z.rzs` Denotes Tree, Deciduous
da d 4 I I N ] I C
da -� x -- x -�f—J I I r ° I o � � Denotes bituminous surface _ji I I I I G (D �
a l I I I I W a d a Z Denotes concrete surface U)
r
1 r I I N I I
LU Lr—
Q I_L_I
Z
Denoteswood fence
II
Z
Denotes chainlink fence
(1:f
Denotes underground Telephone
..
r I I I
Denotes underground electric
—
U7 U
O
d
I m
I I to I I
— — — — — — —
—Denotes easement
z
I
I
I
Denotes righ t of way
(D Q
w
Q
a l I I
I I
I
�
Denotes building setback
Ld
z(�U
I J I
I I
�
dParking
O
Stall Count
1 A
w
Z
LLJ
Proposed Flared End Section
_
O
—
d
�
I 1
M U�
(n
Proposed light pole
SHEET N0.
Proposed storm sewer
2
/
0
I / I
I L
INSTALL 10'' FIBER RCP FES
LOG, TYP.
.j963 ,962 IE=959.00
962 10—LF 12" RCP @ 3.00% \-\\\\10
UE UE UE�\
UE — '�O UE� —
— UE � UE � UE UE UE UE � UE UE UE UE —
_ INSTALL EROSION
962 i CONTROL BLANKET
----------------_-------------------- --
62
T— UT UT J ` - = UT � - <C
963_ C� a 9 6 2
963 I I \ �� `— —
�,�° 963
0.7% STORM CB
RE=962.30
IE=959.30
I I
I
I
I �
I I '
PROVIDE ROCK COQ STRIUCTION
ENTRAN�E (S - E DLTAILS)
I I .25 3.20 3.20
96� 9 .� 9�
/�
i 3•
963
i
FFE=965.6 � ,
i � 1
i
i
d j I
-� �='X ��63.58
(ME)
I � i
i r
I� i
d °
A
FFE=964.25
ROOF SLOPE
ROOF SLOPE
INSTALL 10'' FIBER
LOG, TYP.
UE UE
UJT_:�I
EOO
X
10 0 10 z
0
I -
SCALE IN FEET
CnU
bi
SCALE: III = 101
0
Gradina & Erosion Control Notes
I. Contractor shall confine construction operations to the construction
limits shown.
2. All work shall conform to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Storm Water w
Permit requirements. Contractor shall obtain NPDES permit and comply with all Q
Permit requirements. 0
3. Contractor shall inspect the entire site at least every 7 days and within 24 hours
of any measurable rainstorm. Damaged silt fence or other erosion control device w o
or practices shall be repaired immediately. Inspection and maintenance of devices z
shall continue until the site has undergone final stabilization and a Notice of
LEGEND:
Denotes major contour
Denotes minor contour
Proposed Rip Rap
X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation
Proposed Drainage Flow
Proposed Silt Fence
Proposed Fiber Log
S00 Proposed Major Con tour
800 Proposed Minor Contour
Proposed Erosion Control Blanket
Proposed Bituminous Surface
00000000000 Proposed Rock Construction Entrance
0 0 0 0 o r
° a Proposed Concrete Surface
O
Z
�
M _<J ..
W6J� Q of
US n I---
Termination is submitted to the MPCA.
Z
Q
00
Q
(D
QL
N
4.
All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the
U
p
potential for site erosion.
Z
W
0LO I
Z
:
5.
The site soil erosion and sediment control facilities shall be installed and
M
m m
Ld
0
Z
maintained to conform with the standards specified by the (MPCA).
0
w
J
O
(D
Q
Z Z Y
26.
E
Z
�
Silt fences shall be installed prior the disturbance of any areas and maintained
Q w � _
3
J
until all tributary disturbed areas are restored.
0 0 0 U
0
LJ_
7.
All soils tracked onto pavement or any other off—site areas shall be removed
o
of
mU:2
daily.
daily.
o _0
0_0
(D
r7
O
8.
The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all erosion control
a L E, �, °
N
o
measures, including silt fence and bales, upon establishment of permanent
°— 0
o
vegetation in said areas.
o C
z
9.
All ditches and areas disturbed during construction shall be restored and vegetated
U c ' o
0
as soon as possible. Any finished areas shall be seeded and mulched within
° •° a,
z
14 days after finished grading is completed accordance to Mn/Dot 2575.
a o o
10.
All disturbed areas shall be revegetated with seed mix, mulched, fertilized
0.T ~(n
,� �a
0
II.
& disk anchored.
Backyard drainage be 1%
a=°
�� C °
am
swales shall graded at a minimum slope.
In
12•
Inlet protection devices shall be placed in all storm drainage structures
0 L J
until vegetation is established on slopes.
° °
�, o
T
_ol=-:03
C 0
ZN
N
O
"'
Z
0),q-
100
0
of
LO N
n
W cl
Z"
p W
Hr
W
W
Y
W W
M
SEEDING SCHEDULE
O
C7Z
zL �w
i jN
W 00
Seed mix 25-121: 61 Ib/ac.
(/�
LU LU
>Z
NN
04
Fertilizer 22-5-10: 350 Ib/ac.
Q y
C5
04
Mulch Type 1: 2 T/ac.
0 �
DZ(D ��
U)wZ Ii CO
LEGEND:
Denotes major contour
Denotes minor contour
Proposed Rip Rap
X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation
Proposed Drainage Flow
Proposed Silt Fence
Proposed Fiber Log
S00 Proposed Major Con tour
800 Proposed Minor Contour
Proposed Erosion Control Blanket
Proposed Bituminous Surface
00000000000 Proposed Rock Construction Entrance
0 0 0 0 o r
° a Proposed Concrete Surface
O
Z
�
M _<J ..
W6J� Q of
US n I---
�
Z
Q
Z
Q
(D
QL
U
p
W
Z
W
Z
:
0
Z
Q
(D
Q
W
(D
Z
�
U
Z
o
_J
o
_wo
Q
D_
of
mU:2
(D
I
~ =I
�I \
REMOVE 30 LF PROPOSED BORE EXISTING
0
EXISTING CURB CURB STOP MANHOLE FOR 4"
HDPE SANITARY
I I WET TAP EXISTING S RVICE - - ! ! SEWER
962
IL
o
I�
I�IIII I II �I
l
_
rtLII IT / /—rJ-I I IF
II I III I
I -I
t �
-962 / �I II I I—► I II I �- 9 �""„q .._] 96/� REMOVE
EMOVE IIIIII
FENCE
_TYP. .
u`— uE —ut —`IUE UE
.•4• ,\\-
/
IIIIIII
_
nn
'
- PROTECT
_FEN_CE
TYP.
_uE
962 W __
0
964 406 �LFITYPE
0,=\REMOVE PARKING STRIPES IKII COPPER
SAW CUT AND REMOVE 157 165 LF - 4 HDPE
= SY EXISTING BITUMINOUS SDR 26 @ 2.00%
�
REMOVE FENCE T
PROTEC� FENCE MECHANICAL TO MAE
CONNECTIbNTYP.
UG 0 4” CLEANOUTS, TYP.
o 10
=E
/ I
lit
I R��o
- ► / �
I
W
O
= / I
I I A a
Q ° ° �° a Q° °
A °a ° Q ° O A av d
° / / d° ° a d v d ad ° ° A av A d
A
v ° e Q ° °
A Q ° ° a a d
° v ^
°
° ° e Ad Q °
W I ° V d A v ° Q d v a
I
v d°Q ° a° ° ° d
n v d n
° dO a°a d ° °� ° ° °d a v A A.
I I vI n d° I 7 ° d ° ° v A Ad ° °
A O d ° A A ° Q
° A A °
C7 I \ I I ° °v n Q v v n A
'04° Q v A a
I I A Q° ° Q 8
e ° n°
d � ° v e ° ° d a
° Q a v
A v A °
/ c I ° e v ° Q n
I — I UT UT A o° a ° Q° A v ° A
Cd Q °
I I I ox: I I--- Ltl Q I I ° v 8 d
5L6 °
° � ° a v d° � n g d
a °
=O i Q� ° a n A Qv
W n Q °
V I / a d a ° A° ad a v
W I r ----J I i ° °I A A °
A a Q $ A ad I
\ e ° a
J I v
I \o I°
—
�I' 0 I
I7 I °
I
I IA 4 A
I
I0
W I I
I2
II o
10CIOne
/
�D Wo� I a
0 1
I
IO
I
I
_ I I �� I a l a
\LD
L.LJ
LEGEND:
20
0 20
Denotes
electrical cabinet
®
SCALE
IN FEET
Denotes
light pole
Z
z
hydrant
Denotes
sanitary manhole
O
Denotes
watervalve
UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES SCALE:
I " = 20'
sign
CIL
Denotes
power pole
Denotes
telephone pedestal
I.
Underground utilities shown hereon are as per available utility maps
Cn
Denotes
Flared End Section
and measurements to visible On–site locate markings.
o
culvert
2.
The contractor is specifically cautioned that the location and/or
s�
Proposed Sanitary Cleanout
wood fence
z
elevation of existing utilities as shown on these plans are based on
Q
Denotes
records of the various utility companies and limited measurements
0
taken in the field.
barbwire fence
w
J. The contractor must call the appropriate utility company at
UJ
Denotes
underground Telephone
least 48 hours before any excavation to request exact field
o
W
— — Denotes
overhead electric
location of utilities. It shall be the responsibility of the
z
Denotes
contractor to relocate all existing utilities which conflict
w
wo
underground electric
~
O
with the proposed improvements shown on the plans. The
�z
Denotes
easement
location of utilities shall be obtained by the contractor by
J
z
Denotes
right of way
calling Gopher State One Call at 1-800-252-1/66 or 811.
I\ cn o cn
w
O
Denotes
mayor contour
z
o
4.
Prior to construction, the contractor shall obtain the
M
N
necessary federal, state and local permits for the proposed
Denotes
sanitary sewer
o
J
w
work or verify with the owner or engineer that permits have been
`n m
Denotes
I
�
obtained. Permit fees shall be the responsibility of the contractor
O
—
~
Denotes
waterline
unless otherwise arranged with the owner.
M M o
UJ
5.
All electric, telephone and gas extensions and other service lines
w cD
shall be re–routed and constructed in accordance with the
Q w � _
J
D D D U
D
L-
specifications of the appropriate utility company. The contractor
shall coordinate the service line construction with the utility
o
companies.
°
a s=
O
N
oO
6.
All sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main installations shall
a L ° o
be in accordance with the city's requirements and the current
a) �- C, �
z
building and plumbing code requirements.
aE UJ
z
7.
All sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main construction shall
o C 0
oN �
conform to the City Engineers Association of Minnesota Standard
o o
Specifications, 20/3 Edition.
o
-F 0I„
N
>�
O
8.
Coordinate installation of new utilities with the Mechanical plan.
z o _
A minimum vertical clearance of 18 inches is required at all
O
Ute.9.
watermain and sewer main crossings.
LU N
Q 0 J o
l0.
Manholes in paved areas shall be sumped 0.04 feet and catch
basins in gutters sumped 0. IO feet. Rim elevations shown on
– ° E
these plans reflect sumped elevations.
ll.
All disturbed roadway areas shall be restored to some thickness
Z
N
and quantity.
O Z
��
CO00
12.
Tracer wire shall be installed along all proposed watermain and
oN
sanitary
services.
W y
LON
l3.
Provide minimum 8 feet of cover on all watermains. Insulate any
UJ
watermains that have less than 8 feet of cover.
a
LLI
a
�<
�V
w
M
O
C,ZZ�
i jN
w�
M
�w
liCO)
W w
jz
�N
c�
Cf)wz
a
O
a_
M
zJa-
>Q
..
of
W
JUS
MLd
LEGEND:
Tree, Deciduous
E�
Denotes
electrical cabinet
®
Denotes
electric service
Denotes
light pole
Z
Denotes
hydrant
Denotes
sanitary manhole
►1
Denotes
watervalve
Denotes
sign
CIL
Denotes
power pole
Denotes
telephone pedestal
®
Denotes
electric meter
Denotes
Flared End Section
Denotes
culvert
Denotes
Tree, Coniferous
s�
Proposed Sanitary Cleanout
` Denotes
Tree, Deciduous
Z
Q
Denotes
bituminous surface
_J
0—
Denotes
concrete surface
_JDenotes
wood fence
z
_J
Q
Denotes
chainlink fence
0
Denotes
barbwire fence
w
0
Denotes
underground Telephone
w
z
W
— — Denotes
overhead electric
z
Denotes
underground fiber optics
w
— — — — Denotes
underground electric
~
O
Q
0
Denotes
easement
U
J
z
Denotes
right of way
Q
w
Q
Denotes
mayor contour
z
Denotes
minor contour
(f)U
Denotes
sanitary sewer
J
w
z
J
Denotes
storm sewer
�
O
—
~
Denotes
waterline
M
U
:
/�71– \ – �_ �_ NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
I L ALL UNDERGROUND LOCATE REQUIREMENTS. o
a-
CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: w
� GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
PROPOSED MAPLE TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 OR 811
j963 —,962 TREE, TYP. MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 OR 811
w
962 •
Q
0":
C)
UE UE UE UE U \ UE I — �—� UE UE UE UE —, UE UE UE UE UE — / UE N ' UE �tlC►UE
962 MOfWMENT SIGN 96j i � �o
Ul-- 96 --- ------ — — _ ___ I(n (n
- - - - - - - _ �- �!T �1-= I_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --S UT � �f =�lr= UT = -_— - UT - I UT - - N O
T - UT UT - - - - UT --
I
I I 963— 10 0 10 °'
963LO
�
I ---- 1 I SCALE IN FEET m J
M m o w
SCALE: 1'I = 101 w z z y o
I
I � � Q w � J
I � o 0 0 � o�
I
CF
0-0
PROPOSED TREE SCHEDULE tS 'oE = N
a- z
uZ7
v�EC
41L
MAPLE (2" DIA.) o O 0)QTY2 0o
Z
I I _
I ,
0-.0 •–T
o cn 0
I
U C o
I I o N U
I , n (D vJ o 8
I I
I T � o
t L �,5=
I _oE-o� cn o
HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS:
/ I V
DESCRIPTION AREA PERCENT ZN
Z
PERVIOUS AREA 34,273 SF 41.8% 0 1 00
IMPERVIOUS AREA 47.697 SF 58.2% 000
01
GROSS SITE AREA 81,970 SF 100.0% n LO04
(0
W Vi Z
LV
W wIL QX
/ -
I i LANDSCAPING NOTES O zz w00
G ° d d ° � Ld 07
A °d ° d ° ° d° d 'd ° W w H I
° d ° d °° d d °d d ° ° ° ° ° d d ° d d °a ° ° I. Areas not paved and to be landscaped shall receive minimum of jz N04
°c ° ° d d G° ° ° ° ° e 4 depth as measured in place of topsoil. All graded slopes greater than or equal Q y �� NN
I I ° – d ° a ° ° c d ° d e to 4: I shall be covered by erosion control blanket after topsoil has been placed. cnwz
I ° ° 2. Tree protection fence shall be installed and reviewed by the City prior to the 0 zJ� � •.
c commencement of grading. Establish other tree injury prevention measures as Q?Q on
° I ° I recommended by a qualified tree care specialist. –<J C- on
I , °
I
\ I
I I d I n
I
d I
° I
�— d I
a I ,
Q I I d° I °
d� as 4 I I XXJLLA]]
I '
I X— X
I I I
C
I (�
/ I I W � Z
I
I
� Z � —JI L�.J
I I
Q wLLJ
Q
Z w U 0
o -J o
�wz z
/ / I = 0 Q
m U :2-J
SHEET NO.
/ � I
PAVEMENT MAXIMUM RED COLOR
SLOPE 2% IN
ALL DIRECTIONS. CONCRETE WITH
TRUNCATED
DOMES PER ADA
SPECIFICATIONS
„ _ -„--SIGN POST WITH
s -0 5 0 � 6 o JACCESSIBILITY
I
SYMBOL (TYP)
° d° • n a
4 < °
,SLOEE UP -SCOk UP
° ° 1:12 ..�... s 1:12 4
• ° ° ° ° n e • •• •• a ° ° °
a a
••P• •922 °FACE OF WALK
• G ° ::: ::: ::.::.:a ° ° a ✓ ° OR CURB
4” WIDE YELLOW
PAINT STRIPES
(TYP.)
96" min.
FOR VAN ACCESS
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE
IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN SHOWING THE
INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY
COMPLYING WITH ANSI 4.28.8. SIGNS SHALL
NOT BE OBSCURED BY A VEHICLE PARKED
IN THE SPACE. SEE DETAIL
REMOVE C
FROM CUR
CONCRETE
96" min.
— INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL
OF ACCESSIBILITY;
YELLOW
—4" PAINTED STRIPING
1'-6" O.C. AT 450
(YELLOW REFLECTIVE)
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AND HANDICAP RAMP
s 36 1/211 NI__ CURB BOX ADJUSTABLE 6" TO 9"
35 1 /411 - 1 7/811 r, 11
511
611
17 3/411
3 1/8 "
� 33 � � s 15 (/211
3611 2411
s will— s a
4,311 3 1 11
CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH R -3067—L OR EQUAL
STANDARD INLET CASTING
OUTFALL GUTTER
II
If 6 �
I �I/2"R
—
__
TOP BIT. MAT
311R
\ 3/4" PER FT_ ' —/ 4 „ °a N I
BASE 1 4, 4 f� 1 ° I I+■
°
I 1
I1
12" 1 8" 1
STANDARD GUTTER
Lt 6 II— j
I /—I/211R
— - TOP BIT. MAT—
� a
\ _ 3/8" 3 1 ° ° 11 ° -
\ 3RD
— L — J= — 3/4" PER FT.
a
a
�I a
BASE I a ° °
�I I
A—_
I I 11
811 I L
I 1211 1 8 1
B-612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP. -
TOP TO BEI�2" BELOW EXISTING GROUND
VARIES 10' TO 20'
TIES REQUIRED TO
CLEAN OUTS
FINISHED GRADE
i
I
I 6' PVC RISER FOR COMMERCIAL
4" PVC RSER FOR RESIDENTIAL
'q BEND
4' OR G" VERTICAL WYE IPVC)
I
2000 PSI CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
12' ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL)
r MATER TIGHT GASKET
OR CEMENTED PLUG
�- ------------��------------
IPVC
HORIZONTAL NYE (PVC)
1. PAYMENT FOR 6' RISER PIPE. 6' VERTICCL WYE
45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT
PRICE BID PER EACH. '
2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM
MAIN SEWER LINE.
Title:
Sanitary Clean -Out
Standard Plate Library for
the City of Monticello bate:
03-05 Plate No.
Revised: I 3005
if 1211 MIN
10 FT MAX COVER
12" MIN
CAREFULLY COMPACTED
SELECT GRANULAR
MATERIAL PER MNDOT SPEC 3149.2D
Bc MODIFIED TO 100% PASSING THE I" SIEVE
MAX LIFT OF 8" LOOSE THICKNESS
COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR
\OHO O0O0OC15% Bc
�
`p0 o <0 6th Ido o
I
I--0.5 Bc--l
THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH SHALL
BE SHAPED TO FIT THE PIPE BARREL
FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE
OUTSIDE PIPE DIAMETER.
UL_u u 11VV 1�1r 1 TRIAL PER MN /DOT SPEC 3149.2E
COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY
CLASS B BEDDING
NOTE:
THE ZONE IMMEDIATELY BENEATH THE PIPE SHALL
BE COMPACTED SUFFICIENTLY TO PRODUCE A UNIFORM SUPPORT
HDPE DUAL WALL PIPE BEDDING
TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE
THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED
AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD
PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105)
A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED
AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY
MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN
OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR
DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105)
4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF
STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT
THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT
x
GRANULAR BEDDING AS
PER MN/DOT 3149.21'
GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE
ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER
SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO
12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED
EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
I"Standard Plate Library for
- the City of Monticello
Title:
Typical Trench Compaction
and Class B Bedding
Date: 03_05 Plate No.
Revised: 02-06 3006
NOTE:
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE CITY OF M ON TI CELLO
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS
TOP OF CURB
CONCRETE GUTTER
CURB AND GUTTER TAPER DETAIL
PIPE SIZE d
< 30" 3"
30" 60" 4"
> 60" 6"
1/8 COVER OVER PIPE
6 MIN
CAREFULLY COMPACTE
GRANULAR SELECTED T
Bc MATERIAL. Bc
>oo000cJ_6 Bco
OO O O OOC I
If —0.5 Bch
I I
4f -0.5 Bc--I
THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH SHALL
FINE GRANULAR FILL MATERIAL BE SHAPED TO FIT THE PIPE BARREL
FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE
CAREFULLY COMPACTED OUTSIDE PIPE DIAMETER.
THE MAXIMUM SIZE PARTICLE
ALLOWED IS 3/8".
OVER EXCAVATED TRENCH CONDITION STD TRENCH CONDITION
REFERENCE: NOTE:
CONCRETE PIPE DESIGN MANUAL FOR ROCK OR OTHER INCOMPRESSIBLE MATERIALS, THE
TRENCH SHOULD BE OVEREXCAVATED A MINIMUM OF 6"
PREPARED BY AMERICAN CONCRETE PIPE INSTITUTE AND REFILLED WITH GRANULAR MATERIAL.
CLASS C PIPE BEDDING
w
a
0
O
w Z
I- (n o
(n
O
N
M�
Z
p
O
00
0000
�
of
N
li
1'
W W
DO
U)
nj� C5
H N
I
0
O
Ln
LLI
r
o
�
W
M
M m
o w
w
O
0
J
O
c�
(n Q
w 0
w
Q W a�
_
J
0 0 0
U 0
LL.
N
C
o L.
J
J
w
Z
<
a0�
_
O
U E
U
:2
0
aL°�o
Ln
Ino -°'.0
6
Co'��
C L C
z
+'w•-
z
-0-0 o
C U
O
C:)
+� a�
Cf)
(no
a
U) 0��
U
\
C
U (U
Q.� J
L 0-0 —
)
(n
D
- o E -o
ZN
LO N
O
N
M�
Z
p
W
00
0000
W
of
n C)(3
LO N
W
In
to
z I
n
p
W
Z
W
Hr
W
li
1'
W W
DO
n C)(3
H
CD
N
I jN
O
Z
W 00
Lj LTJ
li
W LL1
>z
nj� C5
H N
I
♦R
�wz
0
LLI
�'(2)
O QJE (0r
z—W r- ..
M JUS
W �Q OJ
n I-- -
�
Z
V^^
L�
W
Of
0
LLI
Z
�
W
I—
O
w
O
0
U
V
<
W
Z
�
U
N
J
J
w
Z
<
_
Ld
M
U
:2
o
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE
IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN SHOWING THE
INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY
COMPLYING WITH ANSI 4.28.8. SIGNS SHALL
NOT BE OBSCURED BY A VEHICLE PARKED
IN THE SPACE.
ANSI 4.28.5 FINISH AND CONTRAST
• POSTS TO BE THE CHARACTERS, SYMBOLS AND BACKGROUND
PRE -PAINTED GALVANIZED STEEL OF SIGN SHALL BE EGGSHELL, MATTE, OR OTHER
NON -GLARE FINISH. CHARACTERS AND SYMBOLS
SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND, WITH
EITHER LIGHT CHARACTERS ON A DARK BACKGROUND
OR DARK CHARACTERS ON A LIGHT BACKGROUND.
12" 1
Proposed signs to be placed in accordance
BLUE- — - with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD).
WHITE— m
REFLECTIVE
FACE A>B
MATERIAL
PABMG
80 Go.
Alum.
+ HANN,EL POST
(2# Ft.) 5 -5" LONG, cO
v— E
SURFACE
4' 4" SLOPED
Y
CONCRETE
tea¢ Flo
pA°�� co
0
600' I I o
�B I I V °
16u
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DETAIL
s PAVE WEAR COURSE
s 1' WIDE
MILL 1 " DEEP
EX. PARKING LOT SECTION
STRAIGHT LINE SAWCUT
EX. BIT. FOR REMOVAL
PROPOSED WEAR COURSE, -
BASE COURSE & AGGREGATE BASE
MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACING
SPECIAL NOTE:
SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID WHEN INSTALLING
DRIVEWAYS TO NOT UNDERMINE OR DAMAGE EXISTING
SIDEWALKS.
3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK / l
ON TOP OF /
6' CRUSHED CONCRETE"OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT
/ TAPER
DEPTH AND WIDTH
IN 1 D'
SIDEWALK
CURB & GUTTER
�3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK
ON TOP OF
3" CRUSHED CONCRETE
Title:
Standard Plate Construction
CST ;oF , st uction Entrance
Monti Library for
Qate: Q —d5 Plate No.
the City of Monticello ReA9ed: 5015
06-14
t 1 i
► � I
I1
A p A A
— 1 1/2" BITUMINOUS MAT
(Mn/DOT 2360 — SP WEA240B)
— TACK COAT (Mn/DOT 2357)
—2" BITUMINOUS MAT
(Mn/DOT 2360 — SPN WB230B)
6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE (Mn/DOT 3138)
COMPACTED SUBGRADE (Mn/DOT 2105, 2111)
TYPICAL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION
VARIES
6x6 W2.9xW2.9 WWF
SLOPE VARIES
e
° a 1. ° ° °� 6" CONCRETE
a
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
95 % MODIFIED PROCTOR
TYPICAL CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION
VARIES
BROOM FINISH
SLOPE VARIES
a °
° 4" CONCRETE
a ° e
e
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
95 % MODIFIED PROCTOR
TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION
TYPICAL MATERIAL SECTIONS
LED 900 SHOEBOX
NOTE: CHECK WITH OWNER FOR SUPPLIER OF
LIGHTS AND MATERIALS
LIGHT POLE
FOUNDATION
i
ABOVE
GRADE
POLE HEIGHT
BASE HT.
ad ° c
BELOW `6
4
GRADE /
o °
a
°
LIGHT POLE DETAIL
1211 THICK
RUNOFF WATER 1811 MINIMUM
WITH SEDIMENT
III , ; 1 Or
— —
1 I 1 11=
SEDIMENT
FILTERED WATE
--CLEAR ROCK (3/411 TO 1 1/211)
411 PVC OVERFLOW PIPE
WITH 1/211 PERFORATIONS
o°o°o°
°°°oooooo
°°o°o°°o°°°°°
o°o°o°
II
-
PA �
01VI I '
WIRE MESH
(1/211 BY 1/21')
CATCH BASIN SEDIMENTATION BARRIER
nrrl r -r1 -r In nl A Tr
EXPAN
JOINT
I II VI I I LVVV I P1U1\IV —" —"—"—
CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION
A
0
I c 41-011
1`0-------------►
2'-011 —�
I
I
I
I
of
-11
(I
�000000000000000010000000000000�
>a 0 0 0 0 o° O O 0 0 00° 00° 0° 00 0a 0° 0
°°°°<
0 0 0 0 0 0°0a0p 00° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
i°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o�
�onOnOnOnOnO"O'On nO"OnOnOnOnOnOn(
EDGE OF
LANDING
FIBER LOGS
)NG WOODEN STAKES
DRIVE THROUGH
2"x2"x4' WOOD
' OF
ko
FFFF NN((��
ST'ROPEXE "SILT STOP" FABRIC
2' 6"
BLY
MIN / 10' MINIMUM
i
EXISTING GROUND BACKFILL %
BURY BOTTOM
6" OF FABRIC
PROPOSE
EMBANKMENT
NOTE: SILT FENCE
I. SILT FENCES CONSTRUCTED WITH SUPPORT FENCES,
POSTS SHALL BE SPACED AT 10' OR LESS, AND DRIVEN
AT LEAST 2' INTO THE GROUND.
2. SILT FENCES CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT SUPPORT FENCES,
POST SHALL BE SPACED AT 4' OR LESS, AND DRIVEN
AT LEAST 3' INTO THE GROUND.
67
1:48 MAX. SLOPE
IN ANY DIRECTION
FOR LANDING AREA
EDGE OF
RAMP
1:12 MAX. RUNNING SLOPE
1:48 MAX. CROSS SLOPE
FOR RAMP
I: 10 MAX.
FLARED SIDES
SLOPE
DETECTABLE
WARNING
B-612 CURB AND GUTTER
6'-0" I 41-011 6'-0"
(5' MIN.) I (3' MIN.) 1 (5' MIN.
A EXPANSION JOINT
PLAN
CURB OR EXPANSION
CURB &GUTTERL — — — —6'—p"— — — — J JOINT
I
----------- --- _
i I
I: 20 1 MAX. —PL
COUNTER L — 4" CONC.
SLOPE
SECTION A—A
MAIN ENTRANCE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP
FILTER FABRIC (
A
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
n21
SECTION B -B B
4
I
I
4 B
L
PLAN
NOTE:
RIP -RAP SHALL BE INSTALLED
TO PROVIDE EASY REMOVAL OF
TRASH GUARD.
Q _�:
oa
0_
w�
�O T_
FILTER FABRIC
RIP -RAP
A
TABLE OF QUANTTIES
SECTION A—A
NOTE:
CLASS 3
N
0)�
DIA.
PIPE SIZES LARGER
d50 = 9"
FILTER
ROUND
L
THAN OR EQUAL TO
FABRIC
Q
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC,
RIP RAP
SHALL COVER THE AREA
(IN.)
FT.
18" DEPTH
CULVERT APRON 3 FT.
0'
Cu. YD.
SQ.YD.
12"
8
6.9
8
15"
8
7.1
9
18"
10
8.9
12
21"
10
10.4
13
24"
12
11.9
17
30"
15
14.0
21
SECTION A—A
RIP -RAP INSTALLATION
Z
O
li
U
V)
W
0
W
NOTE:
O
N
0)�
"
Z
PIPE SIZES LARGER
THAN THOSE SHOWN
REQUIRE A SPECIAL DESIGN
(D
FOR PIPES GREATER
THAN OR EQUAL TO
30". USE 1.5'
Q
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC,
MnDOT SPEC. 3733,
SHALL COVER THE AREA
>
W0
OF THE RIPRAP AND
EXTEND UNDER THE
CULVERT APRON 3 FT.
RIP -RAP INSTALLATION
Z
O
li
U
V)
W
0
W
r0 N
O
N
0)�
"
Z
rn�
W
CO
00 CO
a
0
bjwfyo
D
<
>
W0
�N
a CO
D U
0'
�wz
I- cn o
cn
O
O
W
�
0)N
0
O
U
J
°
O
�^
V
QLij
�
ZlijU
o
M
N
M m
0 Ld
J
O
<
z Z
Y �
W
0
Cf)Q
w U
w
o
Q W 0'
_
J
U 0
LIL.
o L
o�
°_0
O
U E
L
0-L ° a� +
Ln
�°—�u°i
°C '0)
C;
o
° C L C C
z
Z' W -
-0o�
C
O
°o°
a�
Q
oo4o
N
-E(DToCn
a���
(no
L.L
cV
m a� _F
Cn 0
U
,W
\
C
U N I,
N Q_•� J °
N
+,
i
L L i' D
(n /)
0
D
— o E -°
ZN
r0 N
O
N
0)�
"
Z
rn�
W
CO
00 CO
w00
0
n Q(�
r0 N
W
n
"
Z
p
W
�r-
r-
w00
H
bjwfyo
/Z
V
<
IM
n Q(�
H
C7Z
N
i jN
O
w00
bjwfyo
/Z
V
w Lij
jz
�N
a CO
D U
N I
�wz
0 d
LiJ
a(ro)
OQJLo
W
J>Q of
US �bi
Q
/Z
V
p
LiJ
Z
�
W
�
0
O
U
J
�^
V
QLij
ZlijU
N
J
UJ
Z
<
_
W
M
U
o
w
a d
U � U
3�
4.1.mu.W :, q—a
1Otluew o �1a40:""'Jld
LLOULL&A-a
M.0 •e ARn
U3znoa
Lnalv� BupyBr7
--3 a•c7a4O :aweN 4-P U-10--M-od pdedmd
!€i .. � .. .• i,�-{ -
F O
L,
E N
E N
w >-
J-
'k '
6`-4
:
60
• fits
- iib
: •��
�iN
,;, ,•N � : a.`�' -•
F O
L,
E N
E N
w >-
J-
'k '
60
• fits
- iib
: •��
�iN
,;, ,•N � : a.`�' -•
V
00
i---^`'-+,-.,fir--�"-�'•--.-�,L�-
- : _
M.
N
��.-._..:_ .��:.-:'._,.
iV
R •
N
C,
LI)
..O':':
Lo:'"'
yN .
�N
•N.
•(N
•� +�
1
40
-j
•C)
�D
C)
•CD
•p, �p
F O
L,
E N
E N
w >-
I
t -
_Q
Q0
6A
nn{ J
9focl
v� PARK DR. —T4
Site
I
-DMDAS RD.
I I
I I
I I
I I IN
I I I
I I
NO SCALE
Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25,
Wright County, MN
VICINITY MAP
CURVE INFORMATION
Cl Delta=16030'00" L=21.81 R=75.73
LINE INFORMATION
L I N73 °30'00 " 25.80
EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.
(from Title Commitment No. 0J06,3-17)
Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to
the plat on file and of record in the Office of the Register
of Deeds, in and for Wright County, Minnesota, except the
South /00 feet thereof.
And also excepting:
That part of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK,
City of Monticello, that lies East of a line drawn 331.5 feet
West pf and parallel to the East line of said Lots as
measured at right angles thereto, according to plat on file
and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and
for the County of Wright, State of Minnesota.
PROPOSED PARCEL AREA:
Lot 1, Block 1-1.79 acres (77,968 SF)
Lot 2, Block 1-1.88 acres (81,970 SF)
SURVEYORS NOTES:
l) Parcel address: l00 Che/sea Road Monticello, MN
2) PID No 155-018-002012
3) Trees were located individually for the purposes of
this survey.
SOILS CHART
(Entire site is comprised of the single following soil type)
Map symbol & soil name Hydrologic Water table
group dep th (cm)
406; Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes B >200
CHELSEA CORNER
(PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT)
CITY OF MONT/CELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MN
0 50
I Inch = 50 Feet
PID /55-0/8-00/0/2 '
City of Monticello PID /55-0/8-00/020
— � City of Monticello —
6 � �
� � I
II g g6 00 ,. , . /. A x-962 •
' X90000'00"E I J N90000'60"'E 46-11
_crPSH 4W. 06 - N90°00'00"E 33/.50 \P �q3 62
H I UE UE \Dc A,00
I I s%%—s�6���� ( seg --'
W
N I — north line of
Lot 1, Block 2
—/Oft utility easement per I I TN
a I OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK I l�
33/.50--------------------------�
FtL
I II I I� I III I m `
�— I / /0 ► o
a I I /0 m
I l o
U
g �
I I
pole building / j
2
S8 38 45 I I� I I /
5/.6 '.
�I14
I '
I ' �� s
I I �_ 'o
I 50ft transmission
--ocn ine easement per I i ;•, ','� •� % / . / /. / % . . 3 �I
50 — Doc No 55663/
I I I
I
R Q PID 155-0/8-0020/1 p
9' B l o I I One .o W K Properties LLC o
I I� o
1.1 I I I c of
pole building D Z
P '
I I I I Ino, I '• ,`, ,dw.
f I I �y /
1 / r r
I
I I I
I I� , I ' N-1 � I
m
N pole building � I "� I I / � •� /
I I /
2 01
to '
pole building /
`ur
I
y �D
LU I g65I I north line of the
0b
964 � I — South e of �
I I o 1, BB 2�
I— yes Jes—
I3 �622les tae' f
-� -- J r------- - J
1 * N
1 0 e j l� �►�n°au
PID /55-0/8-0020/3
o I I I Chihos Equities LLC
o I
south line of
I — Lot 1, Block 2
I I f
,551—----------------------------I----------------------------------I
—1 N90 °00'00 "E 332.27 •T N90 000'00 "E 331.50 \ I2, OP
BO WART PEDERSON, & ASSOCIATES, INC.
For the purpose of this survey, the North
line of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD
INDUSTRIAL PARK, has a bearing of North
90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East
based on the Wright County Coordinate
System NAD83 (1986).
O Denotes 1/2 inch x /4 inch iron
monument set with a plastic plug
stamped R.L.S. 44360.
• Denotes iron monument found.
Denotes cast iron monument.
Drainage and Utility Easements are shown
thus:
II
6
II
--12�---
II
II
I L----+12—
NOT TO SCALE
Being 12 feet
in width and adjoining right
of way lines
and plat boundary lines, also
being 6 feet
in width and adjoining lot
lines, unless
otherwise indicated, as shown
on the plat.
REFERENCE BENCHMARK:
MnDOT Geodetic Database Station
8605 J, Stamped 8605 J 1967
Elevation = 959.25 (NAVD 88)
PROJECT BENCHMARK:
Top of Hydrant 30 ft north of centerline
of Chelsea Road and 420 ft east of
centerline of Edmonson Avenue
Elevation = 962.48 (NAVD 88)
OWNER & DEVELOPER:
Red Rooster Properties, Inc.
Tom Holthaus
9495 Deegan Avenue NE
Monticello MN 55362
SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS.•
Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc.
13076 First Street
Becker, MN 55308-9322
763-262-8822
ZONING: B-2 Limited Business District
Red Rooster PUD
MINIMUMS: 100 feet Width
Denotes Building Setbacks:
SBL SBL
30' from front
20' from rear
10' from interior side, 20' from street side
DATE: 5/5/17
FIELD DATE: 4/10/17
BK/PG: —
DRAWN BY: ssb
CHECKED BY: ssb, jd
DWG FILE: 17-0112.00
FILE NO: 17-0112.00
REVISIONS:
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or
report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws
of the State of Minnesota.
Signed:
Shannon Bollman
Date: Lic. No. 44360
BOGART, PEDERSON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
LAND SURVEYING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
MAPPING
13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322
TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844
PRELIMINARY
PLAT FOR
Red Rooster Properties, Inc.
Tom Holthaus
City of Monticello
Wright County, MN
Bogart, Pederson
& Associates, Inc.
LAND SURVEYING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
MAPPING
DRAINAGE CAILCCILAlI'M1�1` S
fair
100 Chelsea Rd. Drainage to Chelsea Rd. ROW
City of hVli onticeflo, Wright County, MI`s
Prepared for: Red Rooster Properties, Me.
Date: May 4, 2017
Prepared by: Jeffrey Swanson
I hereby certify that this plan, specification
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly
Registered Engineer under the State of
Minnesota Statues Sections 326.02 to
326.16
Jeffrey Swanson, P.E.
Date: 5/4/2017 Reg. No. 50203
Main Office: Becker Phone: 763/262-8822
13076 First Street Toll free: 888/210-8301
Becker, MN 55308 Fax: 763/262-8844
1. SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS:
Site location: The site is located on Chelsea Road in the City of Monticello.
Existing Site Conditions: The site is currently vacant. Total site area = 1.88 acres.
Surrounding Land Uses: The property is part of an business/industrial park.
Onsite Soils: The onsite soils are primarily Dorser sandy loam. These soils are
considered a hydrologic group type `B".
2. PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Proposed construction includes an office building, serviced by the proposed paved
parking lot in front of the building. The total new impervious area will be 0.24 acre.
Grading will take place on 0.35 acres on the site.
3. STORMWATER MANAGMENT
Curb and gutter of the proposed parking lot will contain runoff from the driveway and the
parking lot. The catch basin will discharge the runoff from the parking lot to the road
ditch. A swale will be constructed east of the parking lot and building which will drain to
the roadway ditch and prevent any roof runoff from draining east on to the neighboring
property. The HydroCAD analysis is attached for the existing and proposed conditions.
The 10 year peak flow through the catch basin is 1.91 cfs @ 2.97 fps through the 12"
RCP pipe.
The discharge rate of the road ditch east of the driveway entrance is as follows:
Ditch Discharge Summary Table
Discharge 2 year event
Existing (0.5 AC) 10.83 cfs
Proposed (0.9 AC) 2.06 cfs
10 year event 1100 year event
1.42 cfs 2.78 cfs
3.33 cfs 6.03 cfs
The discharge rate of the undisturbed area south of the proposed building that flows to
the eastern property is as follows:
Offsite Discharge Summary Table
Discharge 12 year event 10 year event 100 year event
Existing (0.9 AC) 2.61 cfs 4.06 cfs 6.91 cfs
Proposed (0.5 AC) 1.42 cfs 2.18 cfs 3.68 cfs
4. NPDES CONSIDERATIONS
Since the project will disturb less than 1 acre, a Stormwater Permit for Construction is not
required.
CB
1P F2R]
NW. Ditch
NW. Ex. Parking
NE. Ex. Parking &
Building & Conc.
h E of Driveway
�A
To E. of Site
Subcat Reach
Aon LinkRouting Diagram for Existing
Prepared by BPA, Printed 5/4/2017
I
HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Existing
Prepared by BPA
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Area Listing (all nodes)
Area
CN
Description
(acres)
(subcatchment-numbers)
0.085
79
<50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B (3S)
0.242
61
>75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1S)
0.529
96
Gravel surface, HSG C (3S)
0.590
98
Paved parking, HSG C (2S, 3S)
1.445
90
TOTAL AREA
Existing Conditions
Printed 5/4/2017
Paae 2
Existing Conditions
Existing Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3
Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.30"
Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.006 of
Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.58"
Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.79 cfs 0.057 of
Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.26"
Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=2.61 cfs 0.177 of
Reach 211: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=0.83 cfs 0.063 of
Outflow=0.83 cfs 0.063 of
Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.55' Inflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of
Outflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of
Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=2.61 cfs 0.177 of
Primary=2.61 cfs 0.177 of
Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.240 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.99"
59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac
Existing Conditions
Existing Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 4
Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: NW. Ditch
Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.30"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf) CN Description
10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B
10,522 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking
Runoff = 0.79 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af, Depth= 2.58"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf) CN Description
11,491 98 Paved parking, HSG C
11,491 100.00% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc.
Runoff = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 af, Depth= 2.26"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
14,188
98
Paved parking, HSG C
23,042
96
Gravel surface, HSG C
3,703
79
<50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B
40,933
95
Weighted Average
26,745
65.34% Pervious Area
14,188
34.66% Impervious Area
Existing Conditions
Existing Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 5
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway
Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.49" for 2 -Year event
Inflow = 0.83 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.063 of
Outflow = 0.83 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.063 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert
Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.30" for 2 -Year event
Inflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of
Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 961.55'@ 12.12 hrs
Device Routinq
Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary
961.45' 15.0" Round RCP Round 15"
L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/ 961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf
#2 Primary
962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
Primary OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=961.55' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
L1=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.05 cfs @ 1.62 fps)
2=962.2-
( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site
Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.26" for 2 -Year event
Inflow = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 of
Primary = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Existing Conditions
Existing Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 6
Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.91"
Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.018 of
Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.94"
Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.18 cfs 0.087 of
Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.61"
Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=4.06 cfs 0.283 of
Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=1.42 cfs 0.105 of
Outflow=1.42 cfs 0.105 of
Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.68' Inflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of
Outflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of
Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=4.06 cfs 0.283 of
Primary=4.06 cfs 0.283 of
Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.388 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.22"
59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac
Existing Conditions
Existing Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 7
Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: NW. Ditch
Runoff = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 0.91"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf) CN Description
10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B
10,522 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking
Runoff = 1.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af, Depth= 3.94"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf) CN Description
11,491 98 Paved parking, HSG C
11,491 100.00% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc.
Runoff = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 af, Depth= 3.61"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
14,188
98
Paved parking, HSG C
23,042
96
Gravel surface, HSG C
3,703
79
<50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B
40,933
95
Weighted Average
26,745
65.34% Pervious Area
14,188
34.66% Impervious Area
Existing Conditions
Existing Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 8
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway
Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.49" for 10 -Year event
Inflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.105 of
Outflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.105 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert
Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.91" for 10 -Year event
Inflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of
Outflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 961.68' @ 12.09 hrs
Device Routinq
Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary
961.45' 15.0" Round RCP Round 15"
L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/ 961.03' S= 0.0102 T Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf
#2 Primary
962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
Primary OutFlow Max=0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs HW=961.68' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
12=961=RCPRound 15" (Inlet Controls 0.25 cfs @ 1.62 fps)
2.2-
( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site
Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 3.61" for 10 -Year event
Inflow = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 of
Primary = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Existing Conditions
Existing Type 11 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 9
Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.65"
Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.82 cfs 0.053 of
Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.69"
Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.97 cfs 0.147 of
Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.34"
Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=6.91 cfs 0.496 of
Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=2.78 cfs 0.200 of
Outflow=2.78 cfs 0.200 of
Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.88' Inflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of
Outflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of
Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=6.91 cfs 0.496 of
Primary=6.91 cfs 0.496 of
Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.697 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.78"
59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac
Existing Conditions
Existing Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 10
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch
Runoff = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Depth= 2.65"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf) CN Description
10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B
10,522 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking
Runoff = 1.97 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.147 af, Depth> 6.69"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf) CN Description
11,491 98 Paved parkinq, HSG C
11,491 100.00% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc.
Runoff = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 af, Depth= 6.34"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
14,188
98
Paved parking, HSG C
23,042
96
Gravel surface, HSG C
3,703
79
<50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B
40,933
95
Weighted Average
26,745
65.34% Pervious Area
14,188
34.66% Impervious Area
Existing Conditions
Existing Type 1124 -hr 100- Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 11
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway
Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.76" for 100 -Year event
Inflow = 2.78 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.200 of
Outflow = 2.78 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.200 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert
Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.65" for 100 -Year event
Inflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of
Outflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 961.88'@ 12.08 hrs
Device Routinq
Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary
961.45' 15.0" Round RCP Round 15"
L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf
#2 Primary
962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
Primary OutFlow Max=0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs HW=961.88' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
L2=961=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.82 cfs @ 3.30 fps)
2.i
( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site
Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.34" for 100 -Year event
Inflow = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 of
Primary = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Ai -
2R
N. Ditc of Driveway
� S N. Culvert
NW. Ditch
CB
3P
2S CB to N. Ditch
NW. Ex. Parking
3S
NE. Ex. Parking &
Building
A4P
4S
To E. of Site
NE. Ex. Parking &
Building & Conc.
Subcat Reach
Aon LinkI Routing Diagram for Proposed
Prepared by BPA, Printed 5/4/2017
HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Proposed
Prepared by BPA
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Area Listing (all nodes)
Area
CN
Description
(acres)
(subcatchment-numbers)
0.092
79
<50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B (3S, 4S)
0.242
61
>75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1S)
0.287
96
Gravel surface, HSG B (3S, 4S)
0.561
98
Paved parking, HSG B (3S, 4S)
0.264
98
Paved parking, HSG C (2S)
1.445
90
TOTAL AREA
Proposed Conditions
Printed 5/4/2017
Paae 2
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 @2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 3
Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.30"
Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.006 of
Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.58"
Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.79 cfs 0.057 of
Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=19,277 sf 83.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.26"
Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=1.23 cfs 0.083 of
Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21,657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.37"
Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=1.42 cfs 0.098 of
Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=2.06 cfs 0.146 of
Outflow=2.06 cfs 0.146 of
Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.55' Inflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of
Outflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of
Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=959.88' Inflow=1.23 cfs 0.083 of
12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=10.0' S=0.0300 T Outflow=1.23 cfs 0.083 of
Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=1.42 cfs 0.098 of
Primary=1.42 cfs 0.098 of
Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.244 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.03"
42.94% Pervious = 0.621 ac 57.06% Impervious = 0.824 ac
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 4
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch
Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.30"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf) CN Description
10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B
10,522 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking
Runoff = 0.79 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af, Depth= 2.58"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf)
11,491
11,491
Tc Length
(min) (feet)
15.0
Runoff =
CN Description
98 Paved parkinq, HSG C
100.00% Impervious Area
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building
1.23 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.083 af, Depth= 2.26"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
16,154
98
Paved parking, HSG B
395
96
Gravel surface, HSG B
2,728
79
<50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B
19,277
95
Weighted Average
3,123
16.20% Pervious Area
16,154
83.80% Impervious Area
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 5
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc.
Runoff = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 af, Depth= 2.37"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
8,270
98
Paved parking, HSG B
12,115
96
Gravel surface, HSG B
1,272
79
<50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B
21,657
96
Weighted Average
13,387
61.81 % Pervious Area
8,270
38.19% Impervious Area
Tc Length
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet)
(ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0
Direct Entry,
Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway
Inflow Area = 0.948 ac, 66.95% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.85" for 2 -Year event
Inflow = 2.06 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.146 of
Outflow = 2.06 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.146 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert
Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.30" for 2 -Year event
Inflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of
Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 961.55' @ 12.12 hrs
Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP _Round 15"
L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/ 961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf
#2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 "
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 6
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
Primary OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=961.55' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
L1=RCP_Round 15" (Barrel Controls 0.05 cfs @ 1.62 fps)
2=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch
Inflow Area = 0.443 ac, 83.80% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.26" for 2 -Year event
Inflow = 1.23 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.083 of
Outflow = 1.23 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.083 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 1.23 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.083 of
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 959.88'@ 12.06 hrs
Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 959.30' 12.0" Round RCP -Round 12"
L= 10.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.30'/ 959.00' S=0.0300'/' Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf
PrimaryOutFlow Max=1.23 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=959.88' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
L1=RCP_Round 12" (Inlet Controls 1.23 cfs @ 2.60 fps)
Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site
Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.37" for 2 -Year event
Inflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 of
Primary = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 7
Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10.522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.91"
Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.018 of
Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11.491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.94"
Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.18 cfs 0.087 of
Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=19.277 sf 83.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.61"
Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=1.91 cfs 0.133 of
Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21.657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.72"
Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=2.18 cfs 0.154 of
Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=3.33 cfs 0.238 of
Outflow=3.33 cfs 0.238 of
Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.68' Inflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of
Outflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of
Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=960.06' Inflow=1.91 cfs 0.133 of
12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=10.0' S=0.0300'/' Outflow=1.91 cfs 0.133 of
Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=2.18 cfs 0.154 of
Primary=2.18 cfs 0.154 of
Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.392 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.26"
42.94% Pervious = 0.621 ac 57.06% Impervious = 0.824 ac
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch
Runoff = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 0.91"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf) CN Description
10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B
10,522 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking
Runoff = 1.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af, Depth= 3.94"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf)
11,491
11,491
Tc Length
(min) (feet)
15.0
Runoff =
CN Description
98 Paved parking, HSG C
100.00% Impervious Area
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building
1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.133 af, Depth= 3.61"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
16,154
98
Paved parking, HSG B
395
96
Gravel surface, HSG B
2,728
79
<50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B
19,277
95
Weighted Average
3,123
16.20% Pervious Area
16,154
83.80% Impervious Area
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type 1124 -hr 90 -Year Rainfall=4.98"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 9
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc.
Runoff = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 af, Depth= 3.72"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
8,270
98
Paved parking, HSG B
12,115
96
Gravel surface, HSG B
1,272
79
<50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B
21,657
96
Weighted Average
13,387
61.81 % Pervious Area
8,270
38.19% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway
Inflow Area = 0.948 ac, 66.95% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.01" for 10 -Year event
Inflow = 3.33 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.238 of
Outflow = 3.33 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.238 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert
Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.91" for 10 -Year event
Inflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of
Outflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 961.68' @ 12.09 hrs
Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP Round 15"
L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf
#2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type// 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 10
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
Primary OutFlow Max=0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs HW=961.68' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
�1=RCP_Round 15" (Inlet Controls 0.25 cfs @ 1.62 fps)
2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch
Inflow Area = 0.443 ac, 83.80% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.61" for 10 -Year event
Inflow = 1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.133 of
Outflow = 1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.133 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.133 of
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 960.06' @ 12.06 hrs
Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 959.30' 12.0" Round RCP -Round 12"
L= 10.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.30'/959.00' S=0.0300'/' Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf
Primary OutFlow Max=1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=960.06' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
L1=RCP_Round 12" (Inlet Controls 1.91 cfs @ 2.97 fps)
Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site
Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 3.72" for 10 -Year event
Inflow = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 of
Primary = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 11
Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10.522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.65"
Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.82 cfs 0.053 of
Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11.491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.69"
Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.97 cfs 0.147 of
Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=19.277 sf 83.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.34"
Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=3.26 cfs 0.234 of
Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21.657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.45"
Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=3.68 cfs 0.267 of
Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=6.03 cfs 0.434 of
Outflow=6.03 cfs 0.434 of
Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.88' Inflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of
Outflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of
Pond 313: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=960.54' Inflow=3.26 cfs 0.234 of
12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=10.0' S=0.0300'/' Outflow=3.26 cfs 0.234 of
Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=3.68 cfs 0.267 of
Primary=3.68 cfs 0.267 of
Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.701 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.83"
42.94% Pervious = 0.621 ac 57.06% Impervious = 0.824 ac
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 12
Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: NW. Ditch
Runoff = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Depth= 2.65"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf) CN Description
10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B
10,522 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking
Runoff = 1.97 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.147 af, Depth> 6.69"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf)
11,491
11,491
Tc Length
(min) (feet)
15.0
Runoff =
CN Description
98 Paved parkinq, HSG C
100.00% Impervious Area
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building
3.26 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.234 af, Depth= 6.34"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
16,154
98
Paved parking, HSG B
395
96
Gravel surface, HSG B
2,728
79
<50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B
19,277
95
Weighted Average
3,123
16.20% Pervious Area
16,154
83.80% Impervious Area
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 13
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc.
Runoff = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 af, Depth= 6.45"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Area (sf)
CN
Description
8,270
98
Paved parking, HSG B
12,115
96
Gravel surface, HSG B
1,272
79
<50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B
21,657
96
Weighted Average
13,387
61.81 % Pervious Area
8,270
38.19% Impervious Area
Tc Length
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet)
(ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0
Direct Entry,
Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway
Inflow Area = 0.948 ac, 66.95% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.50" for 100 -Year event
Inflow = 6.03 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.434 of
Outflow = 6.03 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.434 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert
Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.65" for 100 -Year event
Inflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of
Outflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 961.88'@ 12.08 hrs
Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP Round 15"
L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/ 961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf
#2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Type// 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93"
Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017
HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 14
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
Primary OutFlow Max=0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs HW=961.88' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
L1=RCP_Round 15" (Barrel Controls 0.82 cfs @ 3.30 fps)
2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch
Inflow Area = 0.443 ac, 83.80% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 6.34" for 100 -Year event
Inflow = 3.26 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.234 of
Outflow = 3.26 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.234 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 3.26 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.234 of
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 960.54'@ 12.06 hrs
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 959.30' 12.0" Round RCP -Round 12"
L= 10.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.30'/959.00' S=0.0300'/' Cc= 0.900
n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf
PrimaryOutFlow Max=3.25 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=960.54' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tai [water)
L1=RCP_Round 12" (Inlet Controls 3.25 cfs @ 4.14 fps)
Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site
Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.45" for 100 -Year event
Inflow = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 of
Primary = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
z
O
a
0
Z
a
a
Q
Z
/W
V
W
J
CL
1: M
0 0
to
CO
N N
w
cu
N
Q
N
In m
d
a� 0)m �
�
N
ai
-o
3 c
m
a
c6
N
O
'O
mN
y E
co
N
c a, E
CL
U
O
p)
m E
O
c ^
m N O'
(n
E
N
t°o
N°
N
3
m
c a
ami y co
Q
m
o
)
p)
s 2
O
E
O
U w
ca c L7
mm
0
c Q)
c_cu
—
a
w m
3 m
'en,
Q
U
~O
.°cam'
N C n cn m
co
O_
N
W
d Q
m
o
3
U
T
- 0)
aa)i
c
ca
o
.c a°)
c'�
°
c
�o
m
°
o
E Tm
°
N
O
d
N 2
L "O Q N m
E 75 O
O
@
a
N
a) c, E N
O_
E
N
m
d' .O
N
O O O N
O_'O
w -O
'O N
O
L '`
N
N
may m
0
U
U)
N
�
Q O
>
f6
w
(D
co
Z E
-0(1) c
O fl_
a) to
co
N
p N 0
-
N
«
T...
m m •?
� d (9
p)
O)m
m
m0
N
m
tD)
E
•�
T7
N
c �.
d> T
0
a) L m m 7
'
N "6
N
Q)
(6
-O Q.
>' O
U)
... 3 a
7
7
Q
CO
'
7
(6
O m
a N N E
tq 0
0— m
N U
O
(Oo
Q p)
a) 2
Q
0
O. O
N
m
L O
O
O O- N
U
c
'dN
to N
m (top
`U)=p
.O
c i
p_ N N a) 7
O_ O
(n O
'p 3
E
'p
w N
O m
t
F r
d E
p >> N p
U> U
m O to � U
2 O_ a Q m
� "'
H O
(n CO
to
for
m p
O N
L p m t
H U N
T
N
J
U)
O
ZU)
m
co .>-
= m
U)
� a
_d
co m
y
>
N °O
U
CL
co C
ti U
ca
m
L
L
m
c
m
rn
O
m O
>,
c m
S
m m
'o
O
tp
Q Co
L
O
O
O.
U) to
J N
N
.d..
m
a O
p
m
O
L
0-
Z
d
N N
N
O
m
m
CL O
U) cn
N
>
a) L
O
d
O_ N L 'ca
cn j to O Rv.
7
J
Q
� �
L
i
dCL
` y N
L
�y
W m
F-
i
o
0
m
0
N
L o
a
a
U)
m
n.
y
Q
> a
3
)
d
«.
t.. ..
q
d
y0
m
0 m n.
pa
>
a a
>
m a °o
d
cn
n
3
o
m
`o
o o
d _ S
m m
O
_a
0 O W o
n d a
Q m
m
m m
d
LL O T
o
w
"O
r
O
U)>
d > U
"O
3
N
> >
m
N
d U d
C d d
m Q
cn
to to
o m m U
U
(9 (D
J
2
M 2 a K
fn to U) an to to
d
c
G.
a)
�
O
U x
0
°'r
t
X
d
a �
L
to
1
y
O
C
m
�
d
�
3 N
f6 O
Z U
�I
Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota
Map Unot Legend
Wright County, Minnesota (MN171)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI I
260
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2
4.2
0.6%
percent slopes
11
406
Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2
571.7
76.3%
percent slopes
441
Almora loam, 0 to 2 percent
10.2
1.4%
slopes
1015
Udipsamments (cut and fill
8.2
1.1%
land)
1087B
Angus-Malardi complex, 2 to 6
0.0
0.0%
percent slopes
1288
Seelyeville and Markey soils,
19.6
2.601
ponded, 0 to 1 percent
slopes
13628
Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent
2.1
0.3%
slopes
1368
Southhaven loam, 0 to 2
5.2
0.7%
percent slopes
1377B
Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2
72.1
9.6%
to 6 percent slopes
1377C
Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 6
33.9
4.5%
to 12 percent slopes
1377D
Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 12
2.2
0.3%
to 20 percent slopes
1377E
Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 20
20.1
2.7%
to 35 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
749.6
100.0%o
USDA Natural Resources
Web Soil Survey
5/1/2017
Conservation Service
National Cooperative Soil Survey
Page 3 of 3
Map Unit Description: Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ---Wright County, Minnesota
Wright County, Minnesota
406—Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2wOm2
Elevation: 660 to 1,710 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 33 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 48 degrees F
Frost -free period: 120 to 170 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Dorset and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of
the mapunit.
Description of Dorset
Setting
Landform: Flats
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and
gravelly outwash
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 11 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 20 inches: sandy loam
2Bk - 20 to 38 inches: gravelly coarse sand
2C - 38 to 79 inches: gravelly coarse sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):
Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent
Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0
to 2.0 mmhos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017
�� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2
Map Unit Description: Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ---Wright County, Minnesota
Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral
(G091AN002MN)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Corliss
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Flats
Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Other vegetative classification: Sandy (G091AN022MN)
Hydric soil rating: No
Oylen
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flats
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral
(G091 AN002MN)
Hydric soil rating: No
Forada
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Swales
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Other vegetative classification:
(G091AN003MN)
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Forada, occasionally ponded
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Depressions
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Other vegetative classification:
(G091 AN003MN)
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Data Source Information
Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral
Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral
Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota
Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 19, 2016
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017
�� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2
X z
o_
20 0 20
U
O
SCALE IN FEET
SCALE: I" = 20'
E LEGEND. otes electrical cabinet 5 -
Denotes
Denotes electric service
Denotes sanitary service
Denotes sanitary manhole �z
Denotes watervolve---------
--(T- Denotes sign ut N a
`r Denotes power pole .0 ' a
Denotes guy wire j o
.. Denotes telephone pedestal
Denotes electric meter i=
Denotes cable television box zZ i
Denotes fiber optic service box k3 S2 3 w
Denotes underground gas o 0 o v o
M Denotes mailbox
' Denotes soll boring
Denotes well Eo L N
Denotes air conditioning o_ 8 s u0i
Denotesas meter i3 d
g z
Denotes Flared;Etwkored End Section - g
- - Denotes culvert ti
Denotes Wetland m ° ° az
e 3
Denotes Tree, Coniferous -5&.2u, En
Denotes Tree, Deciduous
rQo$m v
v> o a
Denotes bituminous surface :� -
T P
EN tS in o
Denotes concrete surface
I ( Denotes grovel surface 0 Z
crDenotes wood fence $�
Wj
-------
Denotes chainlink fence W
-- - Denotes barbwire fence Q I" �^
Denotes stone wall Q 4
- -- - - _ Denotes underground Telephone m
Denotes overhead electric 0
- Denotes underground fiber optics
--- _ -. Denotes underground electric Q.
Denotes underground gas line 0 o u o
J
.. Denotes tree linem zsaM -0 +!l 5�
-------- Denotes easement
Denotes right of way
Denotes major contour
-- -- - _ Denotes minor contour
-- -- - Denotes sanitary sewer
-- - - Denotes storm sewer
- Denotes waterline
— — — — Denotes existing adjoiners
Denotes wetland
- -- - Denotes open wafer Z
X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation f- Q
t= Proposed Drainage Flow Z Q
e e d Proposed Silt Fence 0 J
LLJ
---8pp-- Proposed Major Contour U5CDX00— Proposed Minor Contour Q 0:J Z Q
Proposed Erosion Control Blanket W z :2 Q
C-- Proposed Bituminous Surface (n O
Proposed Rip Rap Q w CD
Z LLJ U Z
J H H
LLJ Z (n
2 0 x
M C0 W
SHEET N0.
2
a I
I
- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
�� H \
20 0 20 Z
O
SCALE IN FEET
SCALE: I" = 20' o
/
/ Grading & Erosion Control Notes
1. Contractor shall confine construction operations to the construction
limits shown.
— — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2. All work shall conform to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Storm Water
Permit requirements. Contractor shall obtain NPDES permit and comply with all
_-4 Permit requirements. o
\ J 3.
i Contractor
my r shall Inspect the emir site least rrewithin
ld hours
of my rainstarm. Damaged silt fence oother son co t oId
devl a z
or practices shall be repaired immediately. Inspection and maintenance of evicesa"
`\ shall continueuntil the site has undergone final stabilization and a
Termination Is submitted to the MPCA. I` I o 00
� N
f \\� �"` `` 4. All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the P"
potential for site erosion. W) o
/''• i / / / - A I ` A - 5. The site sol erosion and sediment control facilities shall be installed and m
maintained to conform with the standards specified by the (MPCA). .Pi 0
l / / I L / '
Z z x r, z
096L912 _.,9961.446 _ X63',071.,_6. Silt fences shall be installed prior the disturbance of any areas and maintained a 13 s 3
a until all tributary disturbed areas are restored. 0 0 0 0 0 r.
7. All soils tracked onto pavement or my other off-site areas shall be removed
f - co
daily.
FES
10 -LF 12 CP O 3.00S
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 8. The site sediment control facilities for the project must be Installed o
/01
{'� '"� - - -- - �- --y ,.-.�-`� Por to y t grading ope ration. ContacttheSol and Water - so
Conservation District (SWCD once sold facilities are Installed and before any 2E'5�c z
•, __r--�-"'----.,..-..ar--,•,. - .•.-.--------- -- - -- . �..•-.'+,.,.-mss..:,_ � _ , _. grading cm take place. - �
��' I _- _ Nva M 1�. _ _.. - _ �a�a 0 d
i I -,� R E A 1 I I e _6 -E' �• v1��. - -_. - 9• The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all erosion control «� ° w m z
�' ;I _ _ p - • - I % 5T OB r measures, including silt fence and bales, upon establishment of permanent "6o_oo mil N
62-M
3o vegetation in said areas. «a-�
g653' 10. All ditches and areas disturbed during construction shall be restored and
vegetatedo j9$
i �= • I I e0 as soon as possible. Any finished areas shall be seeded and mulched within a; •~
14 days after finished grading is completed accordance to Mn/Dot 2575. rr'tt ` A
m89�= c
II. Construction sediment shall be removed from ponds prior to final stabilization. rn
{: n 12. All disturbed areas shall be revegetated with seed mix, mulched, fertilized
('& disk anchored.
�j 13. Backyard drainage swales shall be graded at a minimum 1% slope. Z ti
14. Inlet protection devices shall be placed in all storm drainage structures Q Z
' until vegetation is established on slopes. (A =m
15. Riprap Is to extend to the bottom of the pond. All riprop shall be granite. 1X
16. All existing wells not used for Irrigation purposes shall be abandoned. W CO
UJ lj ge, # , i G I
PRanx-'sLT srOP• FABRICF,
2•XL•z4' Waaa—f 11- O Z,as �
STAKES O 4 O.C. Id MNYU.1 Ci H
j 4c Z
I awstacaRaENo as rABwc
j PROPOSED
[: y EMBA KMw
AV
A3:
SLT FENCE
-II I, ' � M1f• ran.e Roe banvmo I Q
Q
,j i
TEMPORARY WASHED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (NTS)
4FFOINr SCHEDUIFF U5�-
--, - Seed mix 25-121: 61 Ib/ac. W Q
Fertilizer 22-5-10: 350 Ib/ac. Z
Mulch Type 1: 2 T/ac. G W Z
W
k: LEGEND: f U C�
j X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation U O
Proposed Drainage Flow o Q W �
Proposed Silt Fence Z LLj U O
-A , _ Do-- Proposed Major Contour � J � CL
—8p0-- Proposed Minor Contour _ W Z
i _ 0 Z
Proposed Erosion Control Blanket m U
SHEET NO.
Proposed BitinuSurface
I f
Proposed Rip Rop
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
4D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017- 27 accepting grant and committing to
local matching funds for the 2017 MnDOT Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program (SB)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As discussed at the May 8, 2017 City Council workshop, the City has been selected for
funding through the 2017 Greater MN Noise Barrier Program. The Council adopted a
resolution on October 10, 2016 supporting the City's application for a noise barrier along
I-94 in the Balboul neighborhood located south of Prairie Road between Hedman Lane,
Balboul Circle and Marvin Elwood Road. The program requires the City to fund 10% of
the project construction cost. MnDOT is estimating the City's share at $110,000, with
MnDOT's share at $990,000.
MnDOT needs to know by July 1, 2017 if the City will adopt resolution accepting the
grant and commit to the 10% share, so they can allocate funds for the project and start the
design process. Construction could start in the winter of 2018 with tree removal, if
needed, and then the actual construction of the wall would occur in the spring and
summer of 2019. The City's share of the cost would be due in 2018 after the project is
bid. MnDOT will present the City with a cooperative construction agreement similar to
other MnDOT projects completed in the City where there was a City cost share.
A neighborhood meeting was held on June 7, 2017 with the resident's in the area and
with City and MnDOT staff in attendance. Approximately 15 residents attended out of
61 properties notified between Prairie Road and I-94 in the Balboul neighborhood. All
resident's present were supportive of the noise wall. As discussed at the May 8, 2017
Council workshop, the Council still needs to decide whether to pursue special
assessments or not for the City's share of the project cost. At the neighborhood meeting,
residents were made aware that the Council is still considering funding options for the
project, which may include special assessments to the benefiting property owners. A few
residents spoke out that they are not in favor of being assessed.
There are not many examples of other communities assessing for noise barriers since
most are constructed and paid for 100% by MnDOT with a highway expansion project.
The Greater MN Noise Barrier Program is in its second year, with the City of Avon being
awarded the grant in the first year. The City of Avon started to pursue assessments, until
a local property owner/developer offered to fund the 10 % share, therefore assessments
were not levied. In the metro, the City of Edina is the only city that has requested (via
residents petitioning for the project) and been awarded grants for noise walls and also
assessed the 10% city share. Their assessments were based on a tiered approach
depending on proximity of property to noise wall. The assessment rates ranged from
$1,000 to $3,000 per property. Initial discussions with the City attorney and two
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
appraisers indicated that a special assessments can be justified for benefitting properties.
There are 61 properties in the neighborhood, some or all could benefit from the project. A
special benefit analysis would determine the assessment amount. If the Council would
like to proceed with assessing the benefitting properties, a special benefit analysis by a
certified general appraiser could be obtained to determine comparable changes in
property values where noise walls have been constructed. The appraisal fee is estimated
to be $5,000. In lieu of this, staff could research other methods to calculate the
assessments, such as researching comparable property value increases using County
parcel data and speaking with County auditor's where these noise walls have been
constructed recently. The City of Edina used this method and did not obtain a benefit
appraisal, given they had similar property value comparables within their city.
If the Council decides to pursue special assessments, the Council will need to follow the
Chapter 429 process for special assessments and authorize a feasibility study, hold a
public hearing in 2017 or 2018 and then conduct the assessment hearing in 2019 after the
wall is constructed. This process will add to the City's cost for the project. It is
recommended that before a feasibility report is authorized, a special benefit analysis is
authorized.
Al. Budget impact: The proposed noise barrier would be approximately 1,700 feet long
which would cost approximately $1,100,000 based on MnDOT's construction cost
estimate. The City's share of the construction cost is estimated at $110,000 to be paid to
MnDOT in 2018 after the project is bid. If the Council decides to pursue special
assessments, it is estimated that the cost to complete a special benefit analysis, complete a
feasibility report, hold public and assessment hearings, would add approximately $10,000
to the City's costs.
An appropriation will need to be made in 2018 from property tax revenue or existing
reserves to fund the City's share of the cost.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: MnDOT will complete the design, construction management
and maintenance of the noise barrier. City staff and consultant time will be required to
coordinate with MnDOT and additional time if special assessments are pursued.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-27 accepting grant and committing to local matching
funds for the 2017 MnDOT Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program and not pursuing special
assessments.
City Council Agenda: 06/26/17
2. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-27 accepting grant and committing to local matching
funds for the 2017 MnDOT Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program and authorize a special
benefit analysis be completed at a cost not -to -exceed $5,000.
3. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2017-27 at this time.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approving Alternative #1 or #2. If Alternate #2 is selected, it is
recommended to have the special benefit analysis completed and staff will report the
results to council to then decide if a feasibility report should be authorized.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A. Resolution 2017-27
B. Project Location Map
C. 6/7/17 Neighborhood Meeting comments
D. MnDOT noise barrier handout
RESOLUTION 2017-27
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GRANT AND COMMITTING TO LOCAL
MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GREATER MN STAND-ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Greater MN Stand -Alone Noise barrier program was recommended by
the Office of the Legislative Auditor for its ability to create a pathway for communities
outside of the metropolitan area to become eligible for state -funded noise barrier projects;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello supports the important public need to keep certain
lands impacted by traffic noise quiet and preserved; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello submitted application for the MnDOT Greater MN
Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has been awarded grant funds for the program; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, City of Monticello hereby accepts the
grant award commits to the required local financial match of 10% of the project cost for
the MnDOT Greater MN Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program.
ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 26th day of June, 2017.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed,
adopted and approved by the Monticello City Council at their scheduled meeting on June
26, 2017, and recorded in minutes of said meeting.
Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator
Notary Public:
Date:
(STAMP)
OA
Proposed Noise Barrier
May 24, 2017
7W
! n; 4i
p_°
• �, ,4 .r ( � r f F fir.. � • .ti:.'Rl�! � �, ; tiP
! t
f`
IN
Ic
•MftY`Ir FEki Uft 'FRR1
rr of
Monticello
1 inch = 500 feet
Map Powered by Datal-ink
from WSB & Associates
June 7, 2017 NOISE BARRIER NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING COMMENT CARD SUMMARY
House
Last Name
First Name
Street
Comments
Number
A sound reducing wall would be beneficial
because we would finally be able to utilize and
Stegman
Elizabeth
132
Marvin Elwood Rd
enjoy being in the backyard with our family and
animals.
It would be wonderful to be able to enjoy our
Giroux
Shirley
132
Marvin Elwood Rd
backyard.
Build the wall! We cannot enjoy our backyard
because of the noise 24 hrs a day. Find the
matching funds and do it without further
Giroux
Tom
132
Marvin Elwood Rd
burden on the residents. Happy residents will
help the city grow, unhappy residents will leave
the city!
Van Meveren
James
139
Hedman Ln
A great direction
Gookin
Mark
130
Marvin Elwood Rd
We want the wall built.
We hope the wall gets built. Even though we
are 1/2 mile from 94 we still get loud noise
Stachowicz
John
1413
Hilltop Dr
from the interstate. Sometimes we can't even
have the windows open in the house at night.
Nyberg
Janice
134
Marvin Elwood Rd
Yes, we want the wall!
I would like the wall but do not want my taxes
Wilkes
Jacquelyn
127
Hedman Ln
to increase.
The project is sorely needed and we would
Johnson
James & Carol
128
Marvin Elwood Rd
definitely support it.
Metcalf
Larry
112
Hedman Ln
Build the wall please
Myers
Sharon
108
Marvin Elwood Rd
Yes, that would be good.
Yes, please put up the noise barrier so we can
Erickson
Michelle
106
Hedman Ln
enjoy our backyard.
Yes, we want the wall. We want to enjoy
Skillings
Colleen
105
Hedman Ln
outside.
We are in favor of accepting the grant through
the Greater MN Noise Barrier Program.
Robertson
Dennis & Amy
124
Marvin Elwood Rd
Especially as this will not affect our property
taxes and add any special assessments.
Grimm Jeff 106 Marvin Elwood Rd
106 Marvin Elwood Rd supports the proposed
barrier wall. It could go for a bit more on the
West end to protect more homes. On the east
side the open space of the frisbee golf allows
noise to funnel and if going to Otter Creek or
over it to the edge of the golf course is feasible
that would help.
COMPARISON OF
NOISE LEVELS
Measured in dB(A)
B-747-200
Takeoff*
�! Food blender
4
•• • at 3 feet
Noisy urban
daytime
Normal speech
at 3 feet
Dishwasher in
next room
Quiet urban
nightime
Quiet rural
nightime
Threshold of
human hearing
* As measured along the takeoff path 2
miles from the overflight end of the runway
Why is a noise barrier being
proposed?
Currently traffic noise along 1-94 in Monticello exceeds the state's
noise standards. MnDOT has recently developed a program to
address noise concerns for existing neighborhoods in greater
Minnesota. The City of Monticello applied for funding through this
program for your neighborhood. Analysis shows that a noise
barrier would reduce noise in your area by at least 5 decibels,
which is why the noise barrier has been proposed.
Why does MnDOT conduct noise
studies?
MnDOT conducts noise studies to assess existing noise levels
and predict future noise levels to determine noise impacts.
All traffic noise studies and analyses must adhere to the
requirements established by federal law, Federal Highway
Administration Noise Abatement Criteria, Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency Noise Standards, and MnDOT noise analysis
guidelines.
How does MnDOT determine whether a
noise barrier is needed?
A noise barrier must be both feasible and reasonable if it is
to be constructed with the highway project. Feasibility and
reasonableness are determined by quantifiable criteria such as
cost, amount of noise reduction, safety, and site considerations.
Noise mitigation is not automatically provided where noise
impacts have been identified. Decisions on noise mitigation
locations are made on a case-by-case basis.
When would the noise barrier be built?
The noise barrier would be built as soon as 2019.
Frequently -Asked Questions -Am
How do noise barriers work?
Noise barriers block the direct path of sound waves from the highway to adjacent homes and businesses.
However, they will not eliminate all noise - they only reduce the noise by `diffracting' the sound waves from the
noise source to the noise receptor. In order to be considered effective, a noise barrier must reduce noise
impact to receptors by at least 5 decibels.
Noise Source
Diffracted Sound
Homes,
A apartments,
schools,
businesses,
etc.
Noise Barrier Noise -Sensitive Receptor
Can noise increase as it passes over the barrier?
No. Noise does not increase as it passes over the barrier. The further noise travels, the greater the noise reduction.
Could trees block the noise instead of a barrier?
MnDOT would need to have a width of 100 feet of dense evergreen trees to effectively block traffic noise. There
is not enough right-of-way space available to do this in this area.
What impacts do noise barriers have on property values?
There have not been any studies that link property values to noise barriers. Future buyers may either appreciate
the noise reduction the barrier provides, or they may have aesthetic concerns about its presence.
CITY OF
MontiCeflo
COUNCIL CONNECTION
JUNE 26, 2017
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ArtPlace Grant
The City was informed by ArtPlace applicant Sue Seeger that the 2017 Creative
Placemaking grant application for Monticello was not selected among the 70 projects for
further funding consideration. More information on the 70 funded projects can be found
here:
http://www.artplaceamerica.orL/view/pdf?f=/sites/default/files/public/pictures/ncpf 20
17finalists.ydf
Although this year's ArtPlace grant was not selected, staff will continue to work with
Ms. Seeger on ideas for strengthening a future application to ArtPlace, as well as other
grant source opportunities. In addition, staff will be presenting capital improvement
items related to some of the concepts discussed for enhancing walkability and interest
in the downtown through art as part of this year's CIP project.
Improvements — TH25 & CSAH 75
Sue Seeger continues to make progress on the swan sculpture to be located on the
EDA's property at the SE corner of TH 25 and CSAH 75. In addition, Public Works will
be painting the west side of the former BL Bikes building this summer. Landscaping
improvements will be made once the sculpture is in place.
To see more on the sculpture's progress:
httDs://www.voutube.com/watch?v=dSiEbl2ciiRO
httDs://www.voutube.com/watch?v=6tTNMrrmV9rE
State Demographer and Housing Report Update
The Minnesota State Demographer's Office has provided updated projections for 2016,
attached.
The EDA has also reviewed and accepted a Housing Study for Monticello, which
Council Connection — 6/26/17
provides additional information on the current state of residential and outlining
demand in specific residential sectors. Link to report:
http://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/vertical/sites/%7B46185197-6086-4078-ADDC-
OF3918715C4C%7D/uyloads/Item 5. Consideration of Housing Study.9pt v3.pdf
Planning Commission will review the report and hear a presentation on the report in
August.
Community Sign Update
Staff prepared and released a request for quotes for improvements to the community
sign at TH 25 and CSAH 75 and the Hi -Way Liquors sign. Unfortunately, only one
formal quote for the liquor store sign was submitted by the deadline. Given the
potential cost of the sign improvements, staff is extending the deadline in order to
obtain additional quotes.
DATE: June 1, 2017
TO: Jeff O'Neill, Admin
City of Monticello
FROM: Susan Brower
Minnesota State Demographer
SUBJECT: 2016 Population and Household Estimates
Your April 1, 2016 population estimate is 13,409.
Your April 1, 2016 household estimate is 4,911.
If you have any questions or comments about these estimates, please contact the State
Demographic Center, 300 Centennial Office Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN
55155, phone (651) 201-2473 or send an e-mail to local. estimates (a,state.mn.us. All
challenges must be submitted in writing. Please refer to the enclosed sheet for details
HOW TO CHALLENGE THE POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES
FROM THE STATE DEMOGRAPHER
The legal responsibilities of the State Demographer with respect to local population estimates
dictate that we be able to defend any revisions to the estimates. Consequently, we need
documentation for our files. Cited below are types of information we will accept with a challenge
to our estimates. You may select whichever approach is most appropriate for your situation.
However, the more information you can provide the better. No challenv-es will be accepted after.
June 24.
1. You may send us the number of active residential utility accounts in April 2010 and April 2016.
We would prefer electrical accounts, but water and sewer accounts are acceptable. Please
summarize your data. We don't need a list of all utility customers. Summary data for
intervening years are helpful. Utility data are much more useful when provided together
with building permit data (see #2 below).
2. Another approach is to provide the number of housing units added and lost by calendar year for
the years beginning with 2010. Building and demolition permits are a good source of such
information. Be sure to include mobile homes and apartments, and indicate whether any of the
apartments were for the elderly. Please try to be as specific as possible about the type of unit
involved (single-family, apartment, mobile home, etc.).
3. An actual count of persons or households maybe accepted, but places with more than 100
people must contact the State Demographer before proceeding with a count. The count you
submit should be for 2017. We will interpolate a number for 2016. You must provide the
following information:
a. List the house number and street name of each housing unit in your city or township. If
there is more than one unit at an address, please list each unit and provide an apartment
number.
b. Indicate whether the unit is occupied or vacant. If the unit is occupied, indicate the number
of residents. Only year-round residents should be counted. Young people away at college
or in the military, elderly persons who have moved to a nursing home in another town and
seasonal (summer) residents should not be counted.
c. Group qi grters such as nursing homes, dormitories, jails and grout homes should not be
counted as housing units. Give us the name and address of the facility and the number of
residents.
d. After you have listed each housing unit, you must summarize your data and give us the total
number of residents, the total number of vacant units and the total number of occupied
units.
e. Please indicate when the count was completed.
Any additional information you can provide about your community will be appreciated. Changes in
vacancy rates, the conversion of summer homes to year-round use, and changes imemployment
opportunities are the types of things we like to hear about when we are evaluating an estimate.
One final request --when you write to us, please provide your mailing address and a telephone
number or e-mail address where you can be reached during the day.
Thank you.
State Demographic Center
300 Centennial Office Building
658 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55155
Telephone: 651-201-2473
TTY: 651-297-4357
Dear Clerk:
June 1, 2017
MINNESOTA STATE
DEMOGRAPHIC CENTER
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Jeff O'Neill, Admin
City of Monticello
505 Walnut St Ste 1
Monticello, MN 55362-8822
The State Demographer is required by law to produce annual population and household estimates for each of
Minnesota's cities and townships. Enclosed you will find a sheet containing the April 1, 2016, population and
household estimates for your jurisdiction.
These estimates are being sent to you now for review and comment. It's important that our estimates are
accurate, as they are used to distribute state aid to cities and townships. If you have questions about how our
estimates impact a specific program, please contact the state agency responsible for that program.
The enclosed figures represent estimated population and household changes since the 2010 Census. The
number of households corresponds to the number of occupied housing units. A household may be a single
family, one person living alone, or any group of people who share the same living area. While we believe that
our estimates are usually accurate, we realize there may be occasional problems. For this reason, we value your
comments. We may not be aware of such changes as housing demolitions, the gain or loss of group quarters
(like college dormitories, nursing homes, etc.), construction of public housing and the gain or loss of mobile
homes.
Please note that our estimates:
• pertain to one year ago, not the present;
• have also been sent to your county auditor for review;
• are subject to change and are not considered final until they are released to the Minnesota Department
of Revenue in July.
If you are satisried with our estimates, it is not necessary to contact us or provide any further information.. If you
wish to challenge our estimates, please send us the appropriate data described in the enclosed challenge guide by
June 24, 2017. Questions or comments should be directed to James Hibbs at the address listed on the
letterhead. You may also contact us by e-mail at local. estimates a,state.mn.us or by phone at (651) 201-2473.
The volume of phone calls is heavy at this time of year, so you may be asked to leave a message on our voice
mail system. We will respond promptly. Please remember that we cannot correct problems with the 2010.
Census.
Thank you for taking time to review these estimates.
Sincerely,
tui
Susan Brower
State Demographer
Enclosures
CITY OF
Montido
COUNCIL CONNECTION
MAY, 2017
113►V
Transactions
May 2017, the DMV processed 7,623 transactions 417 more than May 2016. DMV year -
to date revenue is $283,675.23 an increase of $39,315.95 or 16.1% over the same period
last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail.
The conversion to the new State MNLARS program will take effect 7/24/17. All deputy
registrar offices will not be able to process motor vehicle transactions from 3:OOpm 7/20
thru 7/22. Per the State, all offices will need to be closed on Saturday 7/22. With limited
staff, our office will be open on 7/21 to process DNR and driver's license applications
only.
$60,000
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
DMV Revenue Comparison
May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017
DMV Transaction Comparison
7 F.71
7 Mr
May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017
DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison
May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017
DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison
38,676
May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017
CITY OF
Monti eff0
COUNCIL CONNECTION
JUNE 26, 2017
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Summary of Recent Meetings:
• Specialty Dental Clinic Groundbreaking, 3880 Deegan Ct., May 31, 2017
• Small Area Study Open House, West Bridge Park, May 31, 2017
• Meeting with Premier Bank, June 2, 2017
• Rotary Club Meeting, June 5, 2017
• Meeting with developer regarding Housing Study findings, June 7, 2017
• Rotary Club Meeting, June 12, 2017
• Meeting with Barry Fluth regarding Housing Study Findings, June 13, 2017
• Business Retention & Expansion Meeting with Production Stamping, June 14,
2017
• MnDOT/MN DEED Workshop on TED/TEDI Grant Program, Roseville, MN,
June 16, 2017
• Meeting with developer regarding concept development, June 19, 2017
• Rotary Club Meeting, June 19, 2016
• Chamber of Commerce Luncheon Meeting, Community Center, June 20, 2017
CITY OF
Monti efl0
COUNCIL CONNECTION
JUNE 26, 2017
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Telephone Purchase
In May 2017 City Council authorized staff to proceed with purchasing a new telephone
system at a cost not to exceed $16,000. When staff put together the final phone order,
the total cost was $16,177.00. Specifically, the city needed four more sidecars than
included in the original quote at $260.00 per sidecar. This maintains the number of
phones with sidecars; it is not an increase of equipment in the new system. The
additional $177.00 needed to secure the necessary equipment was authorized by the
Finance Director.
Arvig anticipates completing the transition for the Monticello Community Center and
City Hall first, and then moving on to the DMV, Hi -Way Liquors and Public Works. All
departments will have the new phones installed by the end of July.
CITY OF
�01 kdo
COUNCIL CONNECTION
JUNE 26, 2017
HI -WAY LIQUORS
Sales through May 30, 2017
Attached are schedules and charts for total sales in each major sales category through
the end of May 2017.
Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2017
Total Sales
Month
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017 CYM-LYM
Jan
$ 249,670.43
$ 316,280.10
$ 300,631.85
$ 296,838.64
$ 302,114.52
$ 328,004.13
$ 355,029.76
$ 380,425.45 $
364,675.32
$ 356,295.18 -2.3%
Feb
255,440.36
284,988.38
285,584.50
315,239.00
307,385.41
337,923.99
333,487.18
347,777.77
362,746.98
364,836.39 0.6%
Mar
295,257.14
318,050.39
324,062.21
335,032.60
388,195.21
408,071.17
377,391.62
388,003.16
401,256.91
417,005.50 3.9%
Apr
281,365.81
346,738.34
369,112.88
389,543.24
347,321.09
388,395.50
389,250.82
421,280.89
428,729.44
448,141.63 4.5%
May
377,177.10
384,337.08
399,489.67
409,309.12
433,829.01
436,195.21
498,095.67
523,401.05
482,917.95
503,867.81 4.3%
Jun
350,727.93
381,782.23
377,458.15
409,726.07
461,423.68
440,255.04
426,392.73
474,203.81
470,585.33
-
Jul
409,870.50
430,838.23
466,122.69
466,738.15
447,452.18
485,459.76
479,174.06
542,973.27
527,519.46
Aug
409,575.96
383,523.07
386,245.30
408,734.83
445,158.94
503,181.84
484,955.71
470,505.22
462,669.36
Sep
317,846.07
346,900.80
346,557.62
373,719.64
390,399.33
379,381.19
397,495.82
439,444.29
448,218.93
Oct
351,268.98
360,742.04
375,367.40
365,702.14
372,676.23
396,328.87
409,967.74
460,096.82
454,442.30
Nov
332,605.88
341,875.49
360,661.96
376,855.40
421,960.12
424,038.37
465,299.53
474,241.74
444,533.08
Dec
436,379.03
454,982.63
485,617.01
505,482.70
527,865.36
518,379.58
549,200.76
569,707.38
605,509.16
Total
$4,067,185.19
$4,351,038.78
$4,476,911.24
$4,652,921.53
$4,845,781.08
$5,045,614.65
$5,165,741.40
$5,492,060.85 $
5,453,804.22
$ 2,090,146.51
Change
$ 283,853.59
$ 125,872.46
$ 176,010.29
$ 192,859.55
$ 199,833.57
$ 120,126.75
$ 326,319.45 $
(38,256.63)
$(3,363,657.71)
Change %
7.0%
2.9%
3.9%
4.1%
4.1%
2.4%
6.3%
-0.7%
-61.7%
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
Monthly Hi -Way Sales
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec
■ 2008
■ 2009
■ 2010
■ 2011
■ 2012
■ 2013
■ 2014
2015
■ 2017
Y -T -D
-2.3%
-0.9%
0.8%
1.9%
2.4%
Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2017
Beer
Month
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017 CYM-LYM
Y -T -D
Jan
$ 122,218.36
$ 157,849.78
$ 146,246.32
$ 143,906.08
$ 149,406.45
$ 160,903.32
$ 173,814.13
$ 191,370.26
$ 176,483.68
$ 174,846.99 -0.9%
-0.9%
Feb
121,734.33
137,055.23
140,624.54
150,075.08
150,589.28
162,865.75
161,168.63
164,508.11
175,055.27
179,346.12 2.5%
0.8%
Mar
138,889.05
155,196.13
164,157.70
163,595.55
203,957.25
192,607.52
185,325.68
192,955.79
199,141.66
208,926.70 4.9%
2.3%
Apr
146,613.65
178,834.20
189,978.23
194,504.16
179,486.77
186,134.31
198,195.77
219,756.39
228,133.10
234,069.51 2.6%
2.4%
May
201,232.14
210,097.48
223,678.47
208,963.65
227,664.73
234,738.30
256,188.77
259,306.91
250,403.11
262,275.25 4.7%
2.9%
Jun
193,801.97
207,793.83
206,043.42
224,769.03
259,671.21
243,389.79
238,322.11
263,421.95
263,264.15
-
Jul
226,317.96
229,199.79
260,971.50
258,734.60
253,648.64
273,319.54
265,555.32
301,867.65
296,513.68
Aug
226,653.65
203,222.86
211,996.32
216,546.53
242,179.20
281,577.25
267,802.95
253,141.21
250,255.41
Sep
166,679.60
183,586.32
183,865.70
199,170.24
208,974.88
202,213.80
211,854.94
233,215.56
238,333.55
Oct
176,382.34
179,873.10
190,893.27
180,043.06
187,386.57
191,764.20
210,454.13
234,882.09
224,253.93
Nov
158,322.50
154,584.13
168,265.14
171,866.27
195,276.37
192,162.71
202,081.91
207,055.40
213,333.23
Dec
187,691.06
190,655.19
203,080.13
216,560.71
224,952.83
217,491.21
234,178.12
241,996.27
253,223.11
Total
$2,066,536.61
$2,187,948.04
$2,289,800.74
$2,328,734.96
$2,483,194.18
$2,539,167.70
$2,604,942.46
$2,763,477.59
$ 2,768,393.88
$ 1,059,464.57
Change
$ 121,411.43
$ 101,852.70
$ 38,934.22
$ 154,459.22
$ 55,973.52
$ 65,774.76
$ 158,535.13
$ 4,916.29
$(1,708,929.31)
Change %
5.9%
4.7%
1.7%
6.6%
2.3%
2.6%
6.1%
0.2%
-61.7%
$350,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
i
$100,000
$50,000
Jan Feb Mar
Monthly Beer Sales
Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov
■ 2008
■ 2009
■ 2010
■ 2011
■ 2012
■ 2013
■ 2014
2015
■ 2017
Dec
Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2017
Liquor
Month
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017 CYM-LYM
Y -T -D
Jan
$ 73,930.87
$ 92,370.42
$ 91,472.50
$ 91,279.01
$ 93,085.69
$ 103,977.89
$ 113,943.25
$ 118,577.85
$ 118,211.20 $
114,509.99 -3.1%
-3.1%
Feb
74,261.89
83,513.27
85,484.92
96,541.21
92,489.93
106,387.16
107,609.55
112,198.85
113,060.59
117,361.15 3.8%
0.3%
Mar
78,870.42
88,569.65
93,133.42
101,047.04
112,244.43
124,487.55
116,316.49
118,269.49
118,839.79
131,238.09 10.4%
3.7%
Apr
76,735.80
90,627.19
95,025.54
110,898.81
98,080.67
113,594.37
115,579.47
123,841.34
126,073.89
130,114.53 3.2%
3.6%
May
103,409.29
102,041.75
106,395.62
111,586.59
114,299.35
127,622.31
135,370.38
140,116.66
129,009.36
142,237.28 10.3%
5.0%
Jun
91,805.81
103,580.02
102,086.20
115,136.72
128,604.32
124,019.90
120,291.71
136,716.81
135,763.26
-
Jul
105,782.85
118,883.98
122,861.98
130,624.19
123,672.73
139,270.04
139,967.77
155,436.54
150,173.35
Aug
106,489.25
103,977.01
101,487.43
113,869.37
126,065.14
141,197.73
138,660.76
136,440.40
135,841.14
Sep
88,448.34
94,335.50
94,528.17
103,373.64
109,153.56
107,605.71
115,119.19
129,195.42
130,101.01
Oct
97,046.60
102,236.90
102,983.14
103,533.14
106,326.73
116,677.74
124,271.15
140,198.97
128,290.50
Nov
97,348.39
90,996.73
102,298.02
105,501.75
120,127.29
126,412.24
134,241.85
132,261.11
134,208.12
Dec
135,221.23
143,684.12
153,690.60
159,717.50
172,370.96
175,523.36
184,746.26
190,944.24
205,335.83
-
Total
$1,129,350.74
$1,214,816.54
$1,251,447.54
$1,343,108.97
$1,396,520.80
$1,506,776.00
$1,546,117.83
$1,634,197.68
$ 1,624,908.04 $
635,461.04
Change
$ 85,465.80
$ 36,631.00
$ 91,661.43
$ 53,411.82
$ 110,255.21
$ 39,341.83
$ 88,079.85
$ (9,289.64) $
(989,447.00)
Change %
7.6%
3.0%
7.3%
4.0%
7.9%
2.6%
5.7%
-0.6%
-60.9%
Monthly Liquor Sales
$250,000
■ 2008
$200,000 ■ 2009
■ 2010
$150,000 —
■ 2011
■ 2012
$100,000 —
■ 2013
$50,000 — ■ 2014
2015
$_ 61 ■ 2017
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2017
Wine
Month
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Jan $
30,700.42
$ 41,810.19
$ 43,324.18
$ 48,437.59
$ 50,238.83
$ 54,949.83
$ 59,391.16
$ 61,128.65 $
Feb
33,407.17
39,410.85
42,230.84
52,847.05
54,642.27
60,573.12
57,228.51
62,600.47
Mar
47,603.93
45,525.38
46,165.18
54,639.16
57,735.22
77,810.58
66,425.24
67,121.51
Apr
31,755.42
48,303.48
61,146.04
62,289.18
57,973.74
79,736.19
63,101.05
63,285.56
May
38,522.75
40,963.86
45,733.08
68,701.95
78,740.40
62,491.07
92,083.62
109,512.94
Jun
31,796.95
37,522.00
44,211.14
49,089.65
56,607.74
59,523.15
54,270.56
59,036.14
Jul
36,909.44
41,813.65
48,334.93
49,664.45
54,467.20
57,115.44
57,743.98
66,029.11
Aug
35,932.62
41,333.00
46,871.28
53,172.68
61,825.30
64,057.61
62,446.04
63,546.01
Sep
33,830.69
39,798.20
47,859.52
53,916.37
60,317.17
59,121.12
59,409.30
62,210.27
Oct
45,750.04
48,422.79
58,081.87
60,949.40
66,423.82
75,606.28
63,659.41
70,038.32
Nov
50,106.64
66,331.86
71,928.30
85,933.28
97,249.52
96,824.40
117,402.23
122,947.90
Dec
75,866.80
84,285.84
101,676.19
109,267.01
116,610.70
113,008.24
115,617.50
120,274.96
Total $
492,182.87
$ 575,521.10
$ 657,562.55
$ 748,907.77
$ 812,831.91
$ 860,817.03
$ 868,778.60
$ 927,731.84 $
Change
$ 83,338.23
$ 82,041.45
$ 91,345.22
$ 63,924.14
$ 47,985.12
$ 7,961.57
$ 58,953.24 $
Change %
16.9%
14.3%
13.9%
8.5%
5.9%
0.9%
6.8%
Monthly Wine Sales
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$-
Jan Feb Mar Apr May
2016 2017 CYM-LYM Y -T -D
60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 -5.3% -5.3%
64,797.38 58,664.45 -9.5% -7.4%
71,840.82 64,286.75 -10.5% -8.6%
61,268.24 69,415.79 13.3% -3.4%
87,333.35 82,724.29 -5.3% -3.9%
54,889.39 -
60,750.62
60,015.78
65,294.31
89,005.29
83,896.45
129,536.28 -
889,082.47 $ 332,366.44
(38,649.37) $ (556,716.03)
-4.2% -62.6%
■ 2008
■ 2009
■ 2010
■ 2011
■ 2012
■ 2013
■ 2014
2015
■ 2017
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
$6.0
$5.5
$5.0
c
$4.5
$4.0
$3.5
$3.0
Liquor Store Sales - Rolling 12 Month Periods
J N w — -6 0 3 E 1 N 0 3 E 1 N 0 3 N w — -6 0 J N w — -6 0 J N w — -6 0 3 91 d 0 3 91 d 0 J d 91
lD O F+ N W A l!1 Ol V
CITY OF
Monti eff0
COUNCIL CONNECTION
JUNE 26, 2017
HUMAN RESOURCES
2017 Pay Equity Report
The City was recently notified that based on the 2017 submittal we have met the
requirements of the Local Government Pay Equity Act. The next compliance report is
due in 2020.
Paid Time Off (PTO) - Bargaining Unit Employees
At the 2017 contract negotiations earlier this year the bargaining unit employees agreed
to consider and vote on adopting the PTO program in 2017 separate from the contract
negotiations. A vote was held on June 15t and the by a vote of 8-5 the employees voted
to accept the PTO program as proposed. The transition to PTO will occur the first full
pay period in July. The bargaining unit program is identical PTO program adopted in
2016 for non -bargaining unit employees.
CITY OF
�01 kdo
COUNCIL CONNECTION
JUNE 26, 2017
MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER (MCC)
Building Improvements
This month we are completing the tile restoration projects of the facility restrooms. The
before and after pictures attached are from the women's restroom tile restoration. We
have also completed some painting projects and the stripping and waxing of the
terrazzo flooring throughout the building.
Before
Transactions and visits
After
Year to date (5.31.17), the MCC processed 48,455 transactions, 8,447 less than this time
last year. The MCC year to date revenue is $666,779, a decrease of $2,546 from the same
time last year. Year to date membership visits are 67,452 total visits, which is 1,726 visits
down from last year. MCC memberships are at a total of 2,086 active memberships.
u -i o N °Q Y o ro IR o R m
W M M mO 4LL'] M1mM1Mam a O
J W � MoM1 M1allo'trmui M f+ot pO sp
M it NMa PI r �?n Mr ry�M 0
F- m 7 r r r
Council Connection - 6/26/17
orf ns �2 M
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 is is (313
:'(3a
N MmMMM rM1 V oaN MW Ln]m t (2 ep N
m N o m M1 M1 a s a m m M m M1 Ln M o r 2 r 11
IM1 f+mmO. om4a��NL ��mri ' ? ep
Ln m M m m m m M M1 N N L[7a a¢ m M r a r Q MLv
Ln7M rNNNM a r[V ep rut
Ln r r Y
r
h W
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o o N o 0 0
aau; m �+a M1Lna aLn LL; LL;aaO
mu'7N rr', ra maN r
�p J
�r~i m
p Cp
6-
r r
W
LLJ
LLI
H
w Z
1.1
LA
z W dW w
W CO LL, W ae
W m 0
pJ
ZLLI���cfiu3 W YZ W D W
z LI
=ww0�� �U�?w Z)w� LU `mow
LLI 5
w��21 F FLLIZ � W LLI R�
nj
Ello
W
o o ui m N M1 M1 a o a u'S
0'0 drL LLU}�DdLLU CHH❑
W
F L j L,]
N Ln
O O m a M N m a o N C1 M M r
Ln Ln L�, N o m �+ N m
r
m? M1 M1 m LL'] M1 Nam m o m
m m a M o g o m a a q m LL; Ln Ln ry o'
ti
� g
�
� r r r g r
Nr VM1M1 VCM
r ry
CVM1rNM1 rNa[VN�r
g MM
wM1M
d
N o m a N N m N m m M1 m N W O
w
M m Mar M m N ui r N a N a M M1 Li m m
Q w
J
raNMrarLv mLnNdNM mN m
mouiNorNm m � a CNmo m ep o
N
ep
�ryNar Ln marLn M1Mmm L;N a
oaMN �nui ui m aM��Nm �
epr
' n
�2�
LL'
mL[; Lc Nom raMN ML+d Lvd
N
ea
Ln to ca �+ m1+[V m M m 1+ n Ln m mNr m
M
avr
W L n N r a w a m r M
� N M M r Ln Ln u' S r
m
N omM1ammoS^'] 4]
4�
[•]ao MM1 amaMmNLC]M1 u'] M1M m
ep
W
r r Q m r a l[7 M m m a O m m N
am�Mo �a�mNoMu - ' rL
N
r�
a j+ m r a M r m a H9 M a M L m m
MMaoo Y+ ml+Ix Nui Ix
x1p
NO M CS
' �P 6P
gym=
i
roo rY+u'S
O
[�NMNre NomNMN
r o M m a
as
m
MaNNMar oo1-M MmNaroo
m m r r N r r a r
n s7 67
V
ti m m
N
v m
so
N
W
H W
M1 rM1 inmMrMM10 r m
Iti
m
aM M1r+j+m M M o m a a�n t�u�N d m
N N N
�C=
a SLC] mmru']a mrn
a mj+a '�u'S mj+mmm ' Ir
M1
w
mM�Of+N mMma arCV Amo m
as oui u'S rr+u'S ' iflNmo uim [n
N ��
' m rr
d�
[C.�fr aoroN eo
�M
a
ammrmo m Not?M1 mM1N
�C+ mm
ry
H
Ltifro Nm
r �r
r!
Mr rr
W
rMNa �mNM1oin m
m
M1i+aa an Lna mM1m as LL; Ln
m ao
=
a m a o a m M1 o a o a m
N� m m �+ ' Lp '
m
' a
m a M1 r o M a m M M1 N r
Q m m�
m m
o
ItiFNM a Nl ro
c
T N Mr M r mr rM
rr
M1 M1NoNM1mu�MM1mNu�NMti
ti
M1NMMmMM1mu�oMu'SMM1oNmrrimN
I� 00
W
aLC]aoNm l[]Nm M1p
r os o N r N a Ln or r o r o m �C
Sp
eP
Mm MMm au"]�C]mNMLC]�C] m[rim j+
u; N u, M— u) c
ep 4O
eG Q Q_
~
r
_
m C� r M r
IY 1 f 1
o =
N �
M[yrr NNm
ea'iaN rrrN M1 rM1 r
is7I
In
ti
r
h W
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o o N o 0 0
aau; m �+a M1Lna aLn LL; LL;aaO
mu'7N rr', ra maN r
�p J
�r~i m
p Cp
6-
r r
W
LLJ
LLI
H
w Z
1.1
LA
z W dW w
W CO LL, W ae
W m 0
pJ
ZLLI���cfiu3 W YZ W D W
z LI
=ww0�� �U�?w Z)w� LU `mow
LLI 5
w��21 F FLLIZ � W LLI R�
nj
Ello
LLI d°°owww
n O
�
!Y
0'0 drL LLU}�DdLLU CHH❑
m aa a a a a a M1 a a a a M1 a a a a a ry Q v
m MLL'] O LC]
NN o I4o xaMN am LnaMoL4� co v
�NL[7ryN�Mry Ln mrryM1 ryd m
W F-
U z
F W LLI 0 U LLI
D
v -
LLI
d0� ¢a 1'LLI ~ W W ��
In LLI W �0 �UME?Z- HO LU
z W
[fi 00D U W LLI 0 LLI LLI LLI LLI LL,}d y
W W J L.1Zd2u7 u7 u}u}u7 u7 u} � Ww
E LLI LLI LLI LLI
0uj w u}u7 u7 u7 u}[f,������ Ov'Z W ILnLL Ewwwwwwrwi,rwi,LL,LL,rLL,rLULLI �Ha r
S O J J J J J J
IN
WJW W YW CL CL CL CL L� LL LL L� L� L� LLH F Q L
a rLCLCLCLrLCLCLoa00000 z SLLIr r�
u.l [[[111555 W
0 d, d, 0 0 tl, [I- L1 L1 d d d L1 W` a' O d =
CITY OF
Monti eff0
COUNCIL CONNECTION
JUNE 26, 2017
PARKS DEPARTMENT
Staff is working on the following tasks listed below:
• Chipping requests
• Cemetery; selling and locating graves
• Locating Riverside grave lot pins
• Equipment/vehicle repairs
• Park rental setups
• Routine building maintenance
• Picnic table construction
• Fertilizing
• Mower maintenance
• BCOL field maintenance
• Pathway sidewalk tree trimming
• Stump grinding
• Snow equipment repairs
• Park sign repairs
• Park sign construction
Updates:
• Storm Cleanup: Staff has been busy cleaning up storm damage brush for
residents, as well as clearing down trees obstructing various pathways.
• Montiview Park Cleanup: Volunteers are asked to help with park cleanup in the
woods, along the trails and with trail building at Montiview Park on Saturday,
June 24ffi, from 10am-3pm. Volunteers should meet at the park at 5980 Jason
Avenue and bring gloves and bug spray and the DirtWirx crew will provide
tools. Hot dogs will be grilled for the helpers after the cleanup.
• Ellison Park: The new structure is 75% complete. Staff poured the concrete floor
this week.
• 41h Street Park: The new basketball court has been installed.
Council Connection — 06/26/17
STREET DEPARTMENT
Shop:
The shop has been busy doing normal maintenance on equipment and vehicles with
other repairs as listed:
• With the wind storm our mechanic has also been out on the streets helping with
brush clean up and sign repairs.
• Replaced gutter brooms on units 132 & 108.
Streets:
• Sign maintenance.
• Boulevard tree trimming in various areas.
• Spring sweeping is underway.
• We have started our crack seal program and are working in the Groveland area.
• Speed trailer is being moved to various areas in the community.
• Blacktop patching in the 2017 chip seal areas.
Stormwater:
• City crews have been doing maintenance in some of the storm water ponds.
Storm Damage: The storm that blew threw Monticello on June 11th did quite a bit of tree
damage, building damage, sign damage and street light damage from a line east of
Edmunson Avenue to the city limits. City crews have been doing cleanup for the past
two weeks. Crews have made two passes through all subdivisions and now are on an
on-call basis for storm damage brush pickup which we will fit into our normal work
schedules.
SEWER & WATER DEPARTMENT
The Sewer & Water Department has been working on the following items.
• Storm damage cleanup throughout the city.
• Cleaning sanitary sewers in the northeast quadrant.
• Exercising water valves in the northeast quadrant.
• Locating water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer services.
• Inspecting new residential and commercial water, sanitary, and storm sewer
services.
• Installing new water meters in all new buildings.
• Checking low and high water usages on residential and commercial accounts.
• Will begin working with the Core City Improvement Project on June 26.
Storm Update: During the June 11 storm, all the lift stations lost power except the
Marvin Road and Chelsea Road lift stations. All five lift station generators ran about 1.5
hours, except Meadow Oak lift station which ran over 13 hours. On the water side, we
ran Well #5 for 1.5 hours on generator power and also ran Well #3 with the reservoir
boosters for 1.5 hours on generator power.
